U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
WORKING PAPER SERIES
ON
HARVEYSLAKE
LUZERNE COUNTY
PENNSYLVANIA
EPA REGION III
WORKING PAPER No, 419
PACIFIC NORTHWEST ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY
An Associate Laboratory of the
NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH CENTER - CORVALLIS, OREGON
and
NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH CENTER - LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
& GPO 697-032
-------
REPORT
ON
HARVEYSLAKE
LUZERNE COUNTY
PENNSYLVANIA
EPA REGION III
WORKING PAPER No, 419
WITH THE COOPERATION OF THE
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES
AND THE
PENNSYLVANIA NATIONAL GUARD
JUNE, 1375
630
-------
CONTENTS
Page
Foreword ii
List of Pennsylvania Study Lakes iv
Lake and Drainage Area Map v
Sections
I. Conclusions 1
II. Lake and Drainage Basin Characteristics 3
III. Lake Water Quality Sunmary 4
IV. Nutrient Loadings 9
V. Literature Reviewed 13
VI. Appendices 14
-------
11
FOREWORD
The National Eutrophication Survey was initiated in 1972 in
response to an Administration commitment to investigate the nation-
wide threat of accelerated eutrophication to fresh water lakes and
reservoirs.
OBJECTIVES
The Survey was designed to develop, in conjunction with state
environmental agencies, information on nutrient sources, concentrations,
and impact on selected freshwater lakes as a basis for formulating
comprehensive and coordinated national, regional, and state management
practices relating to point-source discharge reduction and non-point
source pollution abatement in lake watersheds.
ANALYTIC APPROACH
The mathematical and statistical procedures selected for the
Survey's eutrophication analysis are based on related concepts that:
a. A generalized representation or model relating
sources, concentrations, and impacts can be constructed.
b. By applying measurements of relevant parameters
associated with lake degradation, the generalized model
can be transformed into an operational representation of
a lake, its drainage basin, and related nutrients.
c. With such a transformation, an assessment of the
potential for eutrophication control can be made.
LAKE ANALYSIS
In this report, the first stage of evaluation of lake and water-
shed data collected from the study lake and its drainage basin is
documented. The report is formatted to provide state environmental
agencies with specific information for basin planning [§303(e)], water
quality criteria/standards review [§303(c)], clean lakes [§314(a,b)],
and water quality monitoring [§106 and §305(b)] activities mandated
by the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972.
-------
Beyond the single lake analysis, broader based correlations
between nutrient concentrations (and loading) and trophic condi-
tion are being made to advance the rationale and data base for
refinement of nutrient water quality criteria for the Nation's
fresh water lakes. Likewise, multivariate evaluations for the
relationships between land use, nutrient export, and trophic
condition, by lake class or use, are being developed to assist
in the formulation of planning guidelines and policies by EPA
and to augment plans implementation by the states.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The staff of the National Eutrophication Survey (Office of
Research & Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency)
expresses sincere appreciation to the Pennsylvania Department
of Environmental Resources for professional involvement and to
the Pennsylvania National Guard for conducting the tributary
sampling phase of the Survey.
Walter A. Lyon, Director of the Bureau of Water Quality
Management, Richard M. Boardman, Chief of the Division of Water
Quality, and James T. Ulanoski, Aquatic Biologist of the Division
of Water Quality, provided invaluable lake documentation and
counsel during the Survey, reviewed the preliminary reports, and
provided critiques most useful in the preparation of this Working
Paper series.
Major General Harry J. Mier, Jr., the Adjutant General of
Pennsylvania, and Project Officer Major Ronald E. Wickard, who
directed the volunteer efforts of the Pennsylvania National
Guardsmen, are also gratefully acknowledged for their assistance
to the Survey.
-------
iv
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
STUDY LAKES
STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
LAKE NAME
Allegheny Reservoir
Beaver Run Reservoir
Beltzville
Blanchard Reservoir
Canadohta
Conneaut
Conewago (Pinchot)
Greenlane
Harveys
Indian
Naomi
Ontelaunee
Pocono
Pymatuning Reservoir
Shenango River Reservoir
Still water
Wallenpaupack
COUNTY
McKean, Warren, PA;
Cattaraugus, NY
Westmoreland
Carbon
Centre
Crawford
Crawford
York
Montgomery
Luzerne
Somerset
Monroe
Berks
Monroe
Crawford, PA;
Ashtabula, OH
Mercer
Monroe
Pike, Wayne
-------
HARVEYS LAKE
Tributary Sampling Site
X Lake Sampling Site
¥) Drainage Area Boundary
Map Location
Scar/at
Lake/.
41 23-
41 21-
-------
HARVEYS LAKE*
STORET NO. 4222
I. CONCLUSIONS
A. Trophic Condition:
Survey data indicate Harveys Lake is mesotrophic. It ranked
third in overall trophic quality when the 17 Pennsylvania lakes
sampled in 1973 were compared using a combination of six param-
eters**. Six of the lakes had less median total phosphorus, five
had less and three had the same median dissolved phosphorus, three
had less median inorganic nitrogen, none had greater mean Secchi
disc transparency, and six had less chlorophyll a_. Marked depression
of dissolved oxygen with depth occurred at both sampling stations in
October, 1973.
Survey limnologists observed rooted aquatic vegetation along
the shorelines near both stations in July.
B. Rate-Limiting Nutrient:
Results of the algal assay Indicate phosphorus limitation at
the time the sample was collected (04/12/73). The lake data
indicate phosphorus limitation at the other sampling times as well.
C. Nutrient Controllability:
1. Point sources—There were no known municipal sewage treat-
ment plants impacting Harveys Lake during the sampling year. Septic
* Table of metric conversions—Appendix A.
** See Appendix B.
-------
tanks were estimated to have contributed about 16$ of the total
phosphorus load, but a detailed study would be required to
determine the actual magnitude of these phosphorus inputs.
During the sampling year, Harveys Lake received a total
phosphorus load at a rate less than that proposed by Vollenweider
(Vollenweider and Dillon, 1974} as a eutrophic rate but more than
his suggested oligotrophic rate; i.e., a mesotrophic rate (see
page 12). Because the lake is mesotrophic at this time, every
effort should be made to prevent any significant increase in the
existing loading rate.
2. Non-point sources~Non-point sources, including precipi-
tation, contributed about 84% of the total phosphorus load to
Harveys Lake. The phosphorus exports of the unnamed creeks B-l,
C-l, and D-l (see page 12) were substantially greater than the
exports of unimpacted Pennsylvania streams studied elsewhere.
The greater rates may be due to septic tank discharges, unidenti-
fied point-source wastes, drainage from the urbanized areas around
the lake, or to land-use practices in the lake drainage system.
-------
II. LAKE AND DRAINAGE BASIN CHARACTERISTICS
A. Lake Morphometry^:
1. Surface area: 2.67 kilometers2.
2. Mean depth: 11.0 meters.
3. Maximum depth: 29.3 meters.
4. Volume: 29.370 x 10s m3.
5. Mean hydraulic retention time: 1.6 years.
B. Tributary and Outlet:
(See Appendix C for flow data)
1. Tributaries -
Name
Unnamed Creek (B-l)
Unnamed Creek (C-l)
Unnamed Creek (D-l)
Minor tributaries &
immediate drainage -
Totals
2. Outlet -
Harveys Creek 17.3**
C. Precipitation***:
1. Year of sampling: 89.1 centimeters.
2. Mean annual: 97.8 centimeters.
Drainage
area (km2)*
1.4
2.8
2.3
8.1
14.6
Mean flow
(mVsec)*
<0.1
0.1
0.1
0.4
0.6
0.6
t Ulanoski, 1975.
* For limits of accuracy, see Working Paper No. 175, ...Survey Methods,
1973-1976".
** Includes area of lake.
*** See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
III. LAKE WATER QUALITY SUMMARY
Harveys Lake was sampled three times during the open-water season
of 1973 by means of a pontoon-equipped Huey helicopter. Each time,
samples for physical and chemical parameters were collected from two
stations on the lake and from a number of depths at each station (see
map, page v). During each visit, a single depth-integrated (4.6 m to
surface) sample was composited from the stations for phytoplankton
identification and enumeration; and during the first visit, a single
18.9-liter depth-integrated sample was composited for algal assays.
Also each time, a depth-integrated sample was collected from each of
the stations for chlorophyll ^analysis. The maximum depths sampled
were 19.8 meters at station 1 and 25.6 meters at station 2.
The lake sampling results are presented in full in Appendix D and
are summarized in the following table.
-------
PARAMETER
TEMP 1C)
OISS OXY (MG/L)
CNDCTVY (HCROHO)
PH (STAND UNITS)
TOT ALK (MG/U
TOT P (MG/LI
ORTMO P (MG/L)
N02-N03 (MG/D
AMMONIA (MG/Ll
KJEL N (HG/U
1NORG N IMG/L)
TOTAL N (MG/L1
CHLRPYL A
-------
B. Biological characteristics:
1. Phytoplankton -
Sampling
Date
04/12/73
07/23/73
10/02/73
Dominant
Genera
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Asterionella
Flagellates
Cryptomonas
Fragilaria
Cyclotella
Other genera
Total
Apham'zomenon (?)
Flagellates
Cryptomonas
Microcystis
Ceratium
Other genera
Total
Cryptomonas
Coelosphaerium
Anabaena
Ceratium
Gloeocystis
Other genera
Algal Units
per ml
2,430
299
193
140
88
88
158
966
75
50
25
25
25
37
Total
237
-------
Sampl ing
Date
04/12/73
07/23/73
10/02/73
Station
Number
01
02
01
02
01
02
2. Chlorophyll a^ -
Chlorophyll a_
(yg/1)
5.5
5.4
9.0
5.7
6.3
3.9
C. Limiting Nutrient Study:
1. Autoclaved, filtered, and nutrient spiked -
Ortho P Inorganic N Maximum yield
Spike (mg/1) Cone, (mg/1) Cone, (mq/1) (mg/1-dry wt.)
Control
0.050 P
0.050 P + 1.0 N
1.0 N
2. Discussion -
The control yield of the assay alga, Selenastrum capri-
cornutum, indicates that the potential primary productivity
of Harveys Lake was moderately low at the time of sampling
(04/12/73). Also, the increased yield with the addition of
orthophosphorus alone, and the lack of response to only
nitrogen, shows that the lake was phosphorus limited when
sampled.
0.008
0.058
0.058
0.008
0.160
0.160
1.160
1.160
0.2
4.6
18.9
0.1
-------
8
The lake data indicate phosphorus limitation at the
other sampling times as well. The mean N/P ratios were
30/1 in July and October, and phosphorus limitation
would be expected.
-------
IV. NUTRIENT LOADINGS
(See Appendix E for data)
For the determination of nutrient loadings, the Pennsylvania
National Guard collected monthly near-surface grab samples from each
of the tributary sites indicated on the map (page v), except for the
high runoff months of February and March when two samples were col-
lected. Sampling was begun in May, 1973, and was completed in April,
1974.
Through an interagency agreement, stream flow estimates for the
year of sampling and a "normalized" or average year were provided by
the Pennsylvania District Office of the U.S. Geological Survey for the
tributary sites nearest the lake.
In this report, nutrient loads for sampled tributaries were deter-
mined by using a modification of a U.S. Geological Survey computer
program for calculating stream loadings*.
Nutrient loads for unsampled "minor tributaries and immediate
drainage" {"ZZ" of U.S.G.S.) were estimated using the means of the
nutrient exports, in kg/km2/year, of the unnamed streams at stations
B-l, C-l, and D-l and multiplying the means by the ZZ area in km2.
There were no wastewater treatment plants impacting the lake.
Nutrient loads from septic tanks serving lakeshore dwellings were
estimated at 0.1134 kg P and 4.263 kg N/capita/year.
* See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
10
A. Waste Sources:
1. Known municipal - None
2. Known industrial - None
B. Annual Total Phosphorus Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
kg P/ % of
Source %r total
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
Unnamed Creek (B-l) 30 4.2
Unnamed Creek (C-l) 130 18.2
Unnamed Creek (D-l) 100 13.9
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non-point load) - 295 41.3
c. Known municipal STP's - None
d. Septic tanks* - 115 16.1
e. Known industrial - None
f. Direct precipitation** - 45 6.3
Total 715 100.0
2. Outputs -
Lake outlet - Harveys Creek 205
3. Net annual P accumulation - 510 kg.
* Estimate based on 400 shoreline dwellings; see Working Paper No. 175,
** See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
11
C. Annual Total Nitrogen Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
kg N/ % of
Source yr total
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
Unnamed Creek (B-l) 475 2.6
Unnamed Creek (C-1) 2,375 12.8
Unnamed Creek (D-1) 2,435 13.2
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non-point load) - 6,065 32.8
c. Known municipal STP's - None
d. Septic tanks* - 4,265 23.0
e. Known industrial - None
f. Direct precipitation** - 2.885 15.6
Total 18,500 100.0
2. Outputs -
Lake outlet - Harveys Creek 15,960
3. Net annual N accumulation - 2,540 kg.
* Estimate based on 400 shoreline dwellings; see Working Paper No. 175.
** See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
12
D. Mean Annual Non-point Nutrient Export by Subdrainage Area:
Tributary kg P/km2/yr kg N/km2/yr
Unnamed Creek (B-l) 21 339
Unnamed Creek (C-l) 46 848
Unnamed Creek (D-l) 43 1,059
E. Yearly Loading Rates:
In the following table, the existing phosphorus loading
rates are compared to those proposed by Vollenweider (Vollen-
weider and Dillon, 1974). Essentially, his "dangerous" rate
is the rate at which the receiving water would become eutrophic
or remain eutrophic; his "permissible" rate is that which would
result in the receiving water remaining oligotrophic or becoming
oligotrophic if morphometry permitted. A mesotrophic rate would
be considered one between "dangerous" and "permissible".
Note that Vollenweider's model may not be applicable to
water bodies with short hydraulic retention times.
Total phosphorus Total Nitrogen
Total Accumulated Total Accumulated
grams/m2/yr 0.27 0.19 6.9 1.0
Vollenweider loading rates for phosphorus
(g/m2/yr) based on mean depth and mean
hydraulic retention time of Harveys Lake:
"Dangerous" (eutrophic rate) 0.50
"Permissible" (oligotrophic rate) 0.25
-------
13
V. LITERATURE REVIEWED
Ketelle, Martha J., and Paul D. Uttormark, 1971. Problem lakes
in the United States. EPA Water Poll. Contr. Res. Ser.,
Proj. #16010 EHR, Washington, D.C.
Ulanoski, James, 1975. Personal communication (lake morphometry),
PA Dept. Env. Resources, Harrisburg.
Vollenweider, R. A., and P. J. Dillon, 1974. The application of
the phosphorus loading concept to eutrophication research.
Natl. Res. Council of Canada Publ. No. 13690, Canada Centre
for Inland Waters, Burlington, Ontario.
-------
VII. APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
CONVERSION FACTORS
-------
CONVERSION FACTORS
Hectares x 2.471 = acres
Kilometers x 0.6214 = miles
Meters x 3.281 = feet
Cubic meters x 8.107 x 10 = acre/feet
Square kilometers x 0.3861 = square miles
Cubic meters/sec x 35.315 = cubic feet/sec
Centimeters x 0.3937 = inches
Kilograms x 2.205 = pounds
Kilograms/square kilometer x 5.711 = Ibs/square mile
-------
APPENDIX B
LAKE RANKINGS
-------
LAKES RANKED BY INDEX NOS.
LAKE CODE LAKE NAME
1 4224
2 4220
3 4222
4 422tt
5 4227
6 4223
7 3641
8 4229
9 4221
10 4219
11 4204
12 4226
13 4213
14 421b
15 4225
16 4201
17 4207
LAKE NAOMI
8ELTZVILLE DAM
HARVEY»S LAKE
STILLWATER LAKE
POCONO LAKE
INDIAN LAKE
ALLEGHENY RESERVOIR
LAKE WALLENPAUPACK
CANADOHTA LAKE
BEAVER RUN RESERVOIR
CONNEAUT LAKE
PINCHOT LAKE
PYMATUNING RESERVOIR
SHENANGO RIVER RESERVOIR
ONTELAUNEE DAM
BLANCHARD RESERVOIR
GREENLANE DAM
INDEX NO
445
423
413
401
389
388
385
371
369
360
307
256
206
157
101
85
53
-------
Pi^CENT Or LAKES dlTH HIGHER VALUES (NUMBER OF LAKES WITH HIGHER VALUES)
LAKE
CODE LAKE NAME
3641 ALLEGHENY RESERVOIR
4201 6LANCHARD RESERVOIR
4204 CONNEAUT LAKE
4207 GREENLANE 0AM
4213 PYMATUNING RESERVOIR
4216 SHENANGO RIVER RESERVOIR
4219 BEAVER HUN RESERVOIR
4220 BELTZVILLE 0AM
4221 • CANAOOHTA LAKE
4222 HARVEY'S LAKE
4223 INDIAN LAKE
4224 LAKE NAOMI
4225 ONTELAUNEE DAM
4226 P1NCHOT LAKE
4227 POCONO LAKE
4228 ST1LLWATER LAKE
4229 LAKE WALLENPAUPACK
MEDIAN
TOTAL P
56 (
13 (
44 <
6 <
0 (
19 <
94 {
88 1
50 1
63 1
100 1
81 <
25 <
31 1
38 I
72 I
72 (
9)
2)
7)
1)
0)
3)
15)
14)
; a)
: io>
: 16)
! 13)
! 4)
1 S)
I 6)
i in
! 11)
MEDIAN
1NORG N
38 (
13 (
63 <
6 <
72 <
44 {
19 <
2S <
97 (
81 (
31 1
88 1
0 <
56 1
97 I
72 <
50 '
6)
2)
10)
n
in
: 7i
: 3)
: 4)
; 15)
! 13)
[ 5)
I 14)
I 0)
I 9)
! 15)
t in
I 8)
500-
MEAN SEC
63 <
25 1
69 1
19 1
6 1
13 (
88 1
94 1
56 1
100 1
75 I
44 1
0
31
50
38
81
: io>
: 4)
: in
: 3)
; n
( 2)
[ 14)
; is)
[ 9)
I 16)
! 12)
t 7)
I 0)
( 5)
1 ' 8)
( 6)
( 13)
MEAN
CHLORA
100 (
31 (
56 I
13 (
0 (
6 (
81 (
94 (
19 (
63 (
75 <
69 (
44 (
38 (
88 (
25 (
50 (
16)
5)
9)
2)
0)
1)
13)
15)
3)
10)
12)
11)
7>
6)
14)
4)
8)
15-
MIN 00
69 <
3 t
34 (
3 (
100 (
47 (
19 (
34 <
59 (
47 (
19 (
88 (
19 (
81 (
75 <
94 (
59 (
in
0)
5)
0)
16)
7)
2)
5)
9)
7)
2)
14)
2>
13)
12)
IS)
9)
MEDIAN
D1SS P
59 <
0 (
41 (
6 (
28 t
28 (
59 (
88 (
88 <
59 (
88 (
75 (
13 (
19 <
41 (
100 (
59 (
8)
0)
6)
1)
4)
4)
8)
13)
13)
8)
13)
12)
2)
3)
6)
16)
8)
INDEX
NO
385
85
307
53
206
157
. 360
423
369
413
388
445
101
256
389
401
371
-------
LAKE DATA TO BE USED IN RANKINGS
LAKE
CODE LAKE NAME
3641 ALLEGHENY RESERVOIR
4201 BLANCHARD RESERVOIR
4204 CONNEAUT LAKE
4207 GKEENLANE UAM
4213 PYMATUNING RESERVOIR
4216 SHENANGO RIVER RESERVOIR
4219 BEAVER RUM RESERVOIR
4220 BELTZVILLE 0AM
4221 CANAOOHTA LAKE
4222 HARVEY'S LAKE
4223 INDIAN LAKE
4224 LAKE NAOMI
4225 ONTELAUNEE DAM
4226 PINCHOT LAKE
4227 POCONO LAKE
4228 STILLWATER LAKE
4229 LAKE WALLENPAUPACK
MEDIAN
TOTAL P
0.016
0.064
0.023
0.066
0.070
0.058
0.009
0*010
0.020
0.015
0.008
0.014
0.040
0.027
0.024
0.015
0.015
MEDIAN
INOKG N
0.380
1.300
0.1H5
1.475
0.180
0.340
0.835
0.815
0.130
0.160
0.520
0.135
2.150
0.245
0.130
0.180
0.250
500-
MEAN SEC
414.250
453.143
402.000
460.222
467.750
463.555
384.633
362.444
436.000
338.000
400.222
443.333.
470.667
453.000
436.300
449.000
394.583
MEAN
CHLORA
3.700
15.187
7.567
24.011
56.333
26.800
5.183
4.856
19.J67
5.967
5.211
5.533
11.783
13.950
4.980
18.233
9.617
15-
MIN DO
13.800
14.900
14.600
14.900
7.700
14.500
14.800
14.600
14.100
14.500
14.800
8.000
14.800
11.500
13.200
7.900
14.100
MEDIAN
DISS P
0.006
0.046
0.007
0.020
0.008
0.008
0.006
0.005
0.005
0.006
0.005
0.005
0.011
0.008
0.007
0.004
0.006
-------
APPENDIX C
TRIBUTARY FLOW DATA
-------
FLOW INFORMATION FOR PENNSYLVANIA
1/27/75
LAKE CODE 4222 HAHVEYS LAKE
TOTAL DRAINAGE A*EA OF LAKE(SO KM)
17.3
SUB-DRAINAGE
TRIBUTARY AREAISQ KM)
4222A1
4222B1
4222C1
4222D1
4222ZZ
JAN
FEB
MA«
APR
MAf
NORMALIZED FLOWS(CMS)
JUN JUL AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
DEC
MEAN
17.3
1.4
2.8
2.3
10.8
0.57
0.02
0.06
0.06
0.43
0.59
0.02
0.06
0.06
0.45
O.B5
0.05
O.OB
0.09
0.62
O.B2
0.04
O.Utt
0.09
0.61
0.79
0.02
Cl.Ob
O.OB
0.61
0.42
6.01
0.05
0.04
0.33
0.42
0.00
0.05
0.04
0.33
0.40
0.00
0.05
0.04
0.31
0.37
0.00
0.04
0.03
0.29
0.42
0.01
0.05
0.04
0.33
0.57
0.01
0.06
0.06
0.43
0.6S
0.02
0.07
0.07
0.50
0.57
0.02
0.06
0.06
0.44
TOTAL OHAINAGC AREA OF LAKt =
SUM OF SUB-DRAINAGE AREAS =
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND UAILY FLOWS(CMSI
TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAR
MEAN fLOW DAY
422281
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
74
74
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
74
74
0.74
0.37
0.28
0.09
0.02
0.09
0.18
1.19
0.65
0.34
0.74
0.96
0.03
0.03
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.01
0.05
O.U4
O.U2
O.t5
0.13
19
23
21
25
22
27
17
15
12
9
23
20
19
23
21
25
22
27
17
15
12
9
23
20
17.3
FLO* OAY
U.76
0.07
1.13
0.03
U.09
O.Ob
U.14
0.62
0.25
0.31
0.99
U.4B
U.06
0.01
a. oo
o.oo
o.ou
o.oo
o.oi
0.03
0.01
0.01
0.15
0.02
SUMMARY
TOTAL FLOW IN
TOTAL FLOW OUT
FLOW DAY
FLOW
6.88
6.88
-------
*r l-LOft iuRMMn f IU"j rUK Ht^NirL J AN I A 1/27/75
LAKE CODE 42?? HAKVtYS LUKL
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AiNL) UAlLf FLOmb(CMbJ
TRIBUTARY MONTH YLAK MtAN FLOrt uAY t-LO/y LJ**r f-L'J* jAT1 F L'_H
4222C1 S 7J
f, 73
1 73
8 73
9 73
10 73
il 73
12 7J
1 74
H 74
3 74
4 74
4^^^(Jl 5 73
6 73
7 73
8 7J
9 73
10 73
11 73
12 7J
1 7*
2 74
3 74
4 74
4222ZZ 5 73
6 7j
7 73
8 7J
9 73
10 73
11 73
1? 73
1 1*
?. 74
3 7*
4 7*+
C . f j H
0.04
J.04
0.0 1
O.o2
0.01
0.-J2
u. 12
0.07
0.04
ii.ud
o. 10
0. od
0.04
0.0 'J
j. J 1
0.00
0.01
0.0?
0.13
O.C7
0.03
o.oa
J. 10
O.V7
u.2d
0.22
0 . u 7
O.L2
0.07
0.14
O.wl
u.s<*
•'l p*^
v • c "
0.5t
0.71
1*J
23
21
2b
22
27
17
15
12
V
23
20
1*
23
21
2b
22
27
17
IS
12
9
23
20
I'-*
23
21
?D
22
27
17
ib
12
LJ
V
23
2u
O.Urt
u.Ol
0.11
u .00
J.U 1
O.ul
U.-J2
0.07
u.03
0.04
0.10
0.05
O.OH
0.01
0.12
O.uu
u.ul
u .00
u.ol
0.0 7
0.02
0.03
0.11
U . UD
J.S'i
O.U6
U .HO
u.02
0.07
D.O J
0. 11
U.4W
0.21
ii Jii
t> » C*+
TJ * /H
0. J<+
-------
APPENDIX D
PHYSICAL and CHEMICAL DATA
-------
STORET KETRIEVAL DATE 75/01/27
422201
41 21 18.0 076 02 14.0
HAKVEY'S LAKE
42079 PENNSYLVANIA
DATE
FROM
TO
73/04/12
73/07/23
73/10/02
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
09 45 0000
09 45 0006
09 45 0015
09 45 0025
09 45 0035
09 45 0040
09 45 0060
14 55 0000
14 55 0005
14 55 0015
14 55 0025
14 55 0040
14 55 0063
16 10 0000
16 10 0010
16 10 0024
16 10 0035
16 10 0050
16 10 0065
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.6
25.4
25.0
24.2
14.6
7.8
7.2
17.7
17.6
17,1
8.9
7.7
7.3
11EPALES
00300
DO
HG/L
12.1
12.1
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
8.4
6.5
10.7
6.8
5.0
6.2
S. 4
6.8
1.8
1.2
0.5
00077 00094
THANSP CNDUCTVY
StCCHl FIELD
INCHES MICROMHO
120 105
1UO
100
100
100
100
100
228 93
93
92
64
64
62
130 64
84
83
69
67
83
3
00400
PH
SU
8.60
8.50
8.50
8.50
8.50
a. so
8.50
7.20
7.10
7.20
7.10
6.40
6.30
7.00
6.70
6.60
6.20
6.20
6.20
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
16
16
15
15
15
15
24
31
31
30
30
23
21
19
19
19
19
19
28
2111202
0064
00610
NM3-N
TOTAL
Mli/L
0.060
0.040
0.040
0.040
0.040
0.040
0.040
0.070
0.070
0.040
0.060
0.130
0.200
0.070
O.ObO
0.070
0.040
0.050
0.360
FEET DEPTH
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.700
0.200
0.200
0.200
0.800
0.600
0.700
0.400
0.200
0.300
0.200
0.300
0.400
0.600
0.300
0.200
0.200K
0.200K
0.500
00630
N021N03
N-TOTAL
M(i/L
0.140
0.120
0.120
0.120
0.120
0.120
0.130
U.050
0.050
0.040
0.060
0.160
0.180
0.060
0.040
0.050
0.210
0.290
0.100
00671
PHOS-OIS
OHTHO
MG/L P
0.006
0.008
0.011
0.005
0.005
0.008
0.005
0.006
0.005
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.011
0.018
0.008
0.007
0.008
0.009
0.012
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORE! rttTRIEVAL OATL 75/01/27
00665
DATE TIME DE^TH HHUS-TOT
FROM OF
TO uAY FEET MG/L. f
0.023
0.019
U.y 14
0. 014
0.015
0.014
0.018
u.012
0.010
0.007
U.010
0.010
0.028
U.026
j.Oltt
0.020
G.019
0.021
w.037
32217
CHLWPhYL
A
UG/L
73/04/12
73/07/23
73/10/02
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
14
14
14
14
14
!•*
16
16
16
16
16
16
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
55
55
55
55
55
55
10
10
10
10
10
10
oooo
0006
0015
0025
0035
0040
0060
0000
0005
UG1S
0025
0040
0063
0000
0010
0024
0035
0050
0065
9.0
6.3
41 21 lo.U 07b Oi! 14.0
1 l^
FEET OEPTH
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 75/01/27
422202
41 22 12.0 076 02 44.
HARVEY'S LAKE
PENNSYLVANIA
00010
DATE
FROM
TO
73/04/12
73/07/23
73/10/02
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
15
IS
15
15
15
15
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
FEET
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
0000
0006
0015
0025
0040
0055
0070
0079
0000
0005
0015
0025
0040
0070
0000
0015
0025
0030
0040
0060
0084
MATER
TEMP
CENT
6
6
6
6
6
6
26
25
24
20
8
6
17
17
16
11
8
7
7
.8
.a
.8
.8
.8
.7
.0
.7
.2
.4
.1
.9
.8
.8
.6
.6
.2
.4
.0
HEPALES
00300
DO
MG/L
11.9
11.9
11.9
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
8.5
a.6
10.2
6.8
5.3
6.4
8.2
5.6
2.0
2.1
0.8
0.5
00077 00094
TRANSP CNDUCTVY
SfcCCHI FIELD
INCHES M1CROHHO
120 100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
216 94
94
90
87
62
62
158 83
65
83
73
67
66
73
3
00400
PH
SU
8.60
8.60
8.50
8.70
8.70
8.70
8.60
8.70
7.30
7.20
7.20
7.70
6.40
6.30
6. 70
6.80
6.50
6.30
6.30
6.20
6.30
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
21
20
20
19
19
18
16
16
20
20
20
21
22
24
20
21
21
21
21
21
23
2111202
0083
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.070
0.040
0.040
0.040
0.050
0.040
0.040
0.0*0
0.060
0.050
0.060
0.060
0.110
0.140
0.060
0.050
0.090
0.050
0.050
0.050
0.270
FEET DEPTH
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.300
0.200
0.300
0.200
0.200
0.300
0.200
0.300
0.400
0.200
0.300
0.300
0.400
0.400
0.300
0.200
0.200K
0.200K
0.200K
0.200K
0.400
00630
N02&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.140
0.120
0.120
0.120
0.120
0.120
0.120
0.120
0.050
0.040
0.050
0.050
0.150
0.240
0.040
0.040
0.050
0.130
0.260
0.320
0.210
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.005
0.005
0.007
0.004
0.004
0.005
0.004
0.004
0.002
0.006
0.005
0.005
0.002
0.014
0.006
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.004
0.006
0.010
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STOKtT
DATE 75/01/27
DATE
FROM
TU
73/04/12
UU665
TIME DEPTH PHOS-TOT
OF
DAY FEET MG/L *>
32217
73/07/33
73/10/0*?
10
10
10
JO
10
10
10
10
15
15
15
15
15
15
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
0000
0006
0015
0025
0040
0055
0070
0079
0000
OOOb
0015
0025
0040
0070
oooo
0015
002b
0030
0040
0060
00ti4
0.013
0.024
0.015
0.016
0.017
U.Q14
O.Olb
u.012
u.008
0.007
0.009
o.OU
0.007
0.019
G.Olrf
0.022
0.019
o.oia
0.013
0.020
O.Ob'*
A
UG/L
5.4
S.7
3.9
12.0
00b3 Fdtf
-------
APPENDIX £
TRIBUTARY DATA
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/02/03
4222A1
41 20 45.0 07b 03 30.0
HAKVtYb CKLt*
42039 7.5 riAhVtYb LAKE
0/NArtVtfS LAKt
hrfY tl^. HKU'3 JUST aELO DAM
lltPALtS 21
<+ COOO FEET DEPTH
DATE
FROM
TO
73/05/19
73/06/17
73/07/21
73/08/25
73/09/22
73/10/27
73/11/17
73/12/16
74/02/09
7W02/12
74/02/22
7<»/G3/09
74/03/23
74/04/13
00630 00625
TIME DEPTH N02fciN03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TOTAL N
DAY FEET
10
10
08
10
08
09
09
11
15
09
11
09
09
09
10
00
35
30
10
35
35
20
15
15
50
00
05
15
MG/L
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
a
0
0
0
0
0
.Ot.3
.028
.033
.011
.021
.130
.044
.140
.140
.144
.132
.IbB
. I
-------
STOKET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/02/03
4222H1
41 21 02.0 07to 01 50.0
CHEEK
7.b HARVEYS LAKE
LAKE
HO *40027 CULVERT IN SHAWANESE
11EMALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
DATE
FROM
TO
73/05/19
73/06/17
73/07/21
73/08/25
73/09/22
73/10/27
73/11/lf
73/12/16
74/02/OM
74/02/12
74/02/22
74/03/09
74/0.1/23
74/04/13
00630 00625
TIME DEPTH N02*i.N03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TOTAL N
DAY FEET
11
09
08
10
07
09
09
10
15
09
11
09
09
09
00
45
10
10
30
15
00
40
00
50
15
25
30
00
MG/L
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
u
a
0
0
0
0
.048
.310
.390
.570
.189
.023
.232
.112
.2Jb
.540
.200
,252
.168
.100
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
340
380
370
780
600
600
400
900
200
500
600
400
600
500
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PMOS-UIS PHOb-TOT
TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
024
050
032
067
039
2S2
036
044
045
120
105
100
055
037
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
c.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
p
Olb
026
035
UB
020
021
024
012
040
010
015
010
010
010
MG/L P
0.070
0.060
0.060
0.160
0.055
0.175
0.035
0.025
0.025
0.100
0.020
0.030
0.030
-------
STUKET KETHiEVAL DATE 75/02/03
4222C1
41 21 bU.O 07b 03 35.0
**2 7.3 HAnvtYb LArvE
T/MAKVLYS LAKE
h*r 415 dKuo IN LAKlUij
HtPALtS 2111204
4 0000 KEET DEPTH
DATE
FKOM
TO
73/05/19
73/06/17
73/07/21
73/06/25
73/09/22
73/10/27
73/11/17
73/12/lb
74/02/09
74/02/12
74/02/22
74/03/09
74/03/23
74/04/13
0063U 00625
TIME DtPTrt H02\N03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TOTAL 1st
DAY FEET
09
10
08
10
07
09
09
11
IS
10
11
09
09
09
50
10
45
45
45
00
20
05
20
10
35
45
15
30
MG/L
0
u
0
0
i)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
. Ottd
.350
.430
.720
.210
.45U
.112
.12H
.330
.264
.330
.440
.128
.068
MG/L
2.
1.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
1.
1.
0.
100
100
690
620
780
250
350
100
200
800
600
000
700
100
00610 00671 U0665
NHj-N PHOb-OIS e»hUb-TOT
TOTAL UWTHO
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
G.
0.
0.
u .
0.
0.
0.
c.
0.
0.
072
064
033
132
040
4)94
016
036
022
095
075
135
055
020
MG/L P
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.012
.034
.042
.132
.019
.168
.012
.012
.010
.005K
.100
.010
.005
.010
Mb/L P
O.u2b
0.065
0.06;j
0.250
0.035
0.3^0
0.012
0.015
0.013
0.010
0.12u
0.015
0.025
O.U2U
K VALUE KNOWN TO B£
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STOWE.T KETRIEVAL DATE 75/02/03
4222J1
41 20 46.0 076 01 45.C
UNNAMED CrftEri
42 7.S riAKVLYb LAKE
T/HAKVEYS LAKE
H*Y 4lb ctHOb IK b£ ;>HA*ANEbE
UEPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET
DATE
FHOM
TO
73/05/19
73/06/17
73/07/21
73/08/25
73/09/22
73/10/27
73/11/17
73/12/16
74/02/09
74/02/12
74/02/22
74/03/09
74/03/23
74/04/13
00630 00625
TIME DEPTH N026.N03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TUTAL N
DAY FEET
10
10
08
10
08
09
09
11
15
09
12
10
09
09
25
20
20
20
30
10
40
35
40
00
10
20
20
40
MG/L
0
U
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.ISO
.252
.166
.176
.260
.052
.084
.410
.640
.144
.630
.352
.336
.240
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
2.
0.
U*
1.
0.
4.
1.
0.
0.
0.
300
660
500
500
450
750
950
000
200
200
100
900
100
200
00610 00671 00605
NHI-N PMOS-DIS PHJS-TOT
TOTAL URTHO
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
G.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
019
063
031
120
094
031
040
048
025
190
160
070
03U
020
MG/L
0.
LI.
U.
0.
0.
0.
U.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
p
014
036
040
032
019
050
012
016
020
OOSK
060
020
015
015
MG/L P
O.U25
0.080
0.07U
o.uro
U.035
C.200
0.012
0.025
0.025
0.020
U.24D
0.030
0.025
O.U3U
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
------- |