U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
WORKING PAPER SERIES
PACIFIC NORTHWEST ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY
An Associate Laboratory of the
NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH CENTER - CORVALLIS, OREGON
and
NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH CENTER - LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
•&GPO 697.032
-------
REPORT
ON
INDIAN LAKE
SOMERSET COUNTY
PENNSYLVANIA
EPA REGION III
WORKING PAPER No, 420
WITH THE COOPERATION OF THE
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES
AND THE
PENNSYLVANIA NATIONAL GUARD
JUNE, 1975
637
-------
CONTENTS
Page
Foreword i i
List of Pennsylvania Study Lakes iv
Lake and Drainage Area Map v
Sections
I. Conclusions 1
II. Lake and Drainage Basin Characteristics 3
III. Lake Water Quality Summary 4
IV. Nutrient Loadings 9
V. Literature Reviewed 14
VI. Appendices 15
-------
ii
FOREWORD
The National Eutrophication Survey was initiated in 1972 in
response to an Administration commitment to investigate the nation-
wide threat of accelerated eutrophication to fresh water lakes and
reservoirs.
OBJECTIVES
The Survey was designed to develop, in conjunction with state
environmental agencies, information on nutrient sources, concentrations,
and impact on selected freshwater lakes as a basis for formulating
comprehensive and coordinated national, regional, and state management
practices relating to point-source discharge reduction and non-point
source pollution abatement in lake watersheds.
ANALYTIC APPROACH
The mathematical and statistical procedures selected for the
Survey's eutrophication analysis are based on related concepts that:
a. A generalized representation or model relating
sources, concentrations, and impacts can be constructed.
b. By applying measurements of relevant parameters
associated with lake degradation, the generalized model
can be transformed into an operational representation of
a lake, its drainage basin, and related nutrients.
c. With such a transformation, an assessment of the
potential for eutrophication control can be made.
LAKE ANALYSIS
In this report, the first stage of evaluation of lake and water-
shed data collected from the study lake and its drainage basin is
documented. The report is formatted to provide state environmental
agencies with specific information for basin planning [§303(e)j, water
quality criteria/standards review [§303{c)], clean lakes [§314(a,b}],
and water quality monitoring [§106 and §305(b}] activities mandated
by the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972.
-------
iii
Beyond the single lake analysis, broader based correlations
between nutrient concentrations (and loading) and trophic condi-
tion are being made to advance the rationale and data base for
refinement of nutrient water quality criteria for the Nation's
fresh water lakes. Likewise, multivariate evaluations for the
relationships between land use, nutrient export, and trophic
condition, by lake class or use, are being developed to assist
in the formulation of planning guidelines and policies by EPA
and to augment plans implementation by the states.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The staff of the National Eutrophication Survey (Office of
Research & Development, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency)
expresses sincere appreciation to the Pennsylvania Department
of Environmental Resources for professional involvement and to
the Pennsylvania National Guard for conducting the tributary
sampling phase of the Survey.
Walter A. Lyon, Director of the Bureau of Water Quality
Management, Richard M. Boardman, Chief of the Division of Water
Quality, and James T. Ulanoski, Aquatic Biologist of the Division
of Water Quality, provided invaluable lake documentation and
counsel during the Survey, reviewed the preliminary reports, and
provided critiques most useful in the preparation of this Working
Paper series.
Major General Harry J. Mier, Jr., the Adjutant General of
Pennsylvania, and Project Officer Major Ronald E. Wickard, who
directed the volunteer efforts of the Pennsylvania National
Guardsmen, are also gratefully acknowledged for their assistance
to the Survey.
-------
IV
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
STUDY LAKES
STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
LAKE NAME
Allegheny Reservoir
Beaver Run Reservoir
Beltzville
Blanchard Reservoir
Canadohta
Conneaut
Conewago (Pinchot)
Greenlane
Harveys
Indian
Naomi
Ontelaunee
Pocono
Pymatuning Reservoir
Shenango River Reservoir
Still water
Wallenpaupack
COUNTY
McKean, Warren, PA;
Cattarugus, NY
Westmoreland
Carbon
Centre
Crawford
Crawford
York
Montgomery
Luzerne
Somerset
Monroe
Berks
Monroe
Crawford, PA;
Ashtabula, OH
Mercer
Monroe
Pike, Wayne
-------
40 06'
-40 02
INDIAN LAKE
^Tributary Sampling Site
X Lake Sampling Site
Sewage Treatment Facility
Drainage Area Boundary
i 2 jKm.
Lake
hanksville Stonycreek
A1
outlet
Map Location
78.54
78'50
-------
INDIAN LAKE
STORE! NO. 4223
I. CONCLUSIONS
A. Trophic Condition:
Survey data indicate that Indian Lake is mesotrophic. It
ranked sixth in overall trophic quality when the 17 Pennsylvania
lakes sampled in 1973 were compared using an index of six param-
eters**. None of the lakes had less median total phosphorus,
one had less and three had the same median dissolved phosphorus,
11 had less median inorganic nitrogen, three had less mean chloro-
phyll a_, and four lakes had greater mean Seechi disc transparency.
Marked depression of dissolved oxygen with depth occurred at the
deeper stations 1 and 3 in July and October, 1973.
Survey limnologists did not observe any nuisance conditions
during their visits to the lake.
B. Rate-Limiting Nutrient:
The algal assay results indicate Indian Lake was phosphorus
limited at the time the assay sample was collected (04/23/73).
The lake data indicate phosphorus limitation at all sampling
times.
* Table of metric conversions—Appendix A.
** See Appendix B.
-------
C. Nutrient Controllability:
1. Point sources—The phosphorus contribution of the only
known wastewater treatment plant (Indian Lake Lodge) amounted
to 7.6% of the total reaching the lake. However, this plant
no longer discharges to the lake; and, therefore, the present
total phosphorus loading to the lake is less than the load
measured during the Survey sampling year.
The present phosphorus loading rate to Indian Lake is well
below the rate proposed by Vollenweider (Vollenweider and Dillon,
1974) as an oligotrophic rate (see page 13). Any addition to the
existing phosphorus loading of this lake should be carefully
evaluated with regard to the effect on the existing high quality.
2. Non-point sources—The phosphorus load from non-point
sources was 74.2% of the total reaching the lake during the
sampling year. Clear Run contributed 12.1%, and the ungaged
tributaries and immediate drainage were estimated to have con-
tributed 45.4% of the non-point source phosphorus load. The
phosphorus export of Clear Run was a very low 5 kg/km2/yr (see
page 13).
-------
II. LAKE AND DRAINAGE BASIN CHARACTERISTICS
A. Lake Morphometry :
1. Surface area: 3.04 kilometers2.
2. Mean depth: 4.3 meters.
3. Maximum depth: 18.3 meters.
4. Volume: 13.072 x 106 m3.
5. Mean hydraulic retention time: 303 days.
B. Tributary and Outlet:
(See Appendix C for flow data)
1. Tributaries -
Drainage Mean flow
Name area (km2)* (m3/sec)*
Clear Run 8.4 0.1
Minor tributaries &
immediate drainage - 24.7 0_._4
Totals 33.1 0.5
2. Outlet -
Unnamed Stream (B-l) 36.1** 0.5**
C. Precipitation***:
1. Year of sampling: 102.8 centimeters.
2. Mean annual: 114.4 centimeters.
f Ulanoski, 1974.
* For limits of accuracy, see Working Paper No. 175, "...Survey Methods,
1973-1976"; also see footnote, page 9.
** Includes area of lake; outflow adjusted to equal the sum of the inflows
*** See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
III. LAKE WATER QUALITY SUMMARY
Indian Lake was sampled three times during the open-water season
of 1973 by means of a pontoon-equipped Huey helicopter. Each time,
samples for physical and chemical parameters were collected from
three stations on the lake and from a number of depths at each station
(see map, page v). During each visit, a single depth-integrated {4.6
m or near bottom to surface) sample was composited from the three
stations for phytoplankton identification and enumeration; and during
the first visit, a single 18.9-liter depth-integrated sample was com-
posited for algal assays. Also each time, a depth-integrated sample
was collected from each of the stations for chlorophyll ji analysis.
The maximum depths sampled were 16.8 meters at station 1, 5.5 meters
at station 2, and 8.8 meters at station 3.
The lake sampling results are presented in full in Appendix D and
are summarized in the following table.
-------
TEMP IC>
DISS OAT (MG/LI
CNDCTVY (MCKOMO)
PH (STAND UNJTS)
TOT ALK (MU/L)
IOT P (MG/L>
OrtTHO P (MG/L)
NU2»N03 (MQ/L)
AMMONIA
KJEL N
INOHG N (MG/L)
TOTAL N
J SITES
HANGE MEAN MEDIAN
7.9 - 17.9 14.B 16.9
0,2 - 8.8 4.8 7.U
79. - 10U. 91. 91.
6.0 - 6.6 6.3 6.3
10. - 21. 13. 10.
U.006 - 0.069 0.014 O.OOd
0.003 - 0.007 0.006 O.OOb
0.040 - 0.270 0.136 0.150
0.070 - 0.860 0.29t> 0.170
0,400 - 1.300 0.745 0.700
0.220 - O.VQO 0.431 0.3JO
0.5t>0 - 1.340 0.882 0.950
6.9 - 8.2 7.4 7.0
2.U - 2.1 2.1 2.1
-------
B. Biological characteristics:
1. Phytoplankton -
Sampli ng
Date
04/23/73
07/25/73
10/04/73
Dominant
Genera
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Chrysophyta cells
Di nobryon
Gymnodinium
Synedra
Cycl otel 1 a
Other genera
Total
Cyclotella
Chlorophyta cells
Flagellates
Peri dim' urn
Synedra
Other genera
Total
Cycl o tell a
Flagellates
Ankistrodesmus (?
Oocystis
Xanthidium
Other genera
Algal units
per ml
100
60
33
20
13
7
233
949
161
80
48
16
16
1,270
Total
2,200
-------
2. ' Chlorophyll a^ -
Sampling Station Chlorophyll a^
Date Number (ug/1)
04/23/73 01 0.8
02 1.1
03 0.6
07/25/73 01 7.8
02 9.9
03 4.6
10/04/73 01 6.9
02 7.0
03 8.2
C. Limiting Nutrient Study:
1. Autoclaved, filtered, and nutrient spiked -
Ortho P Inorganic N Maximum yield
Spike (rng/1) Cone, (mg/1) Cone, (mg/1) (mg/1-dry wt.)
Control
0.050 P
0.050 P + 1.0 N
1.0 N
2. Discussion -
The control yield of the assay alga, Selenastrum capri-
cornutum, indicates that the potential primary productivity
of Indian Lake was low at the time the sample was collected
(04/23/73). The results also indicate that Indian Lake was
phosphorus limited at that time (note the significant in-
crease in yield with the addition of orthophosphorus and the
lack of an increase in yield with the addition of nitrogen).
0.008
0.058
0.058
0.008
0.614
0.614
1.614
1.614
0.1
9.8
17.5
0.1
-------
8
The lake data also indicate phosphorus limitation. The
mean N/P ratios were 72/1 or greater at all sampling times,
and phosphorus limitation would be expected.
-------
IV. NUTRIENT LOADINGS
(See Appendix E for data)
For the determination of nutrient loadings, the Pennsylvania
National Guard collected monthly near-surface grab samples from each
of the tributary sites indicated on the map (page v), except for the
high runoff months of February and March when two samples were col-
lected. Sampling was begun in May, 1973, and was completed in April,
1974.
Through an interagency agreement, stream flow estimates for the
year of sampling and a "normalized" or average year were provided by
the Pennsylvania District Office of the U.S. Geological Survey for the
tributary sites nearest the lake*.
In this report, nutrient loads for sampled tributaries were
calculated using mean annual concentrations and mean annual flows.
Nutrient loads shown are those measured minus point-source loads, if
any. Although Boone Run and Rhoads Creek do not affect Indian Lake,
the data are included in Appendix E for the record.
Nutrient loads for unsampled "minor tributaries and immediate
drainage" ("ZZ" of U.S.G.S.) were estimated using the mean annual
* To effectively treat Indian Lake as a separate hydraulic system, the
drainage area for station B-l was planimetered using U.S.G.S. maps.
The gaged discharges, in m3/km2, at stations A-l, C-l, and D-l were
averaged and applied to the B-l drainage area to obtain a flow.
Thus the flow at B-l now represents the outlet flow of Indian Lake.
The drainage area for "minor tributaries and immediate drainage" ("ZZ"
of U.S.G.S.) was obtained by subtracting the surface area of the lake
and the sub-drainage area of C-l from the total planimetered drainage
of Indian Lake (at station B-l), and the averaged discharge was then
applied to the "ZZ" drainage area to obtain a flow (see page 3).
-------
10
concentrations in Clear Run at station C-l and the mean annual ZZ
flow.
The operator of the Indian Lake Lodge wastewater treatment plant
provided monthly effluent samples and corresponding flow data.
A. Waste Sources:
1. Known municipal -
Pop. Mean Flow Receiving
Name Served Treatment (m3/d) Water
Indian Lake 47** pond 17.9 Indian Lake
Lodge*
2. Known industrial - None
* Kimmel, 1975 (as of 10/31/74, this plant was no longer in operation).
** Estimate based on flow at 0.3785 m3/capita/day.
-------
11
B. Annual Total Phosphorus Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
kg P/ % of
Source yr total
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
Clear Run 40 12.1
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non-point load) - 150 45.4
c. Known municipal STP's -
Indian Lake Lodge 25 7.6
d. Septic tanks* - 60 18.2
e. Known industrial - None
f. Direct precipitation** - 55 16.7
Total 330 100.0
2. Outputs -
Lake outlet - Unnamed Stream (B-l) 175
3. Net annual P accumulation - 155 kg.
* Estimate based on 220 lakeside dwellings; see Working Paper No. 175,
** See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
12
C. Annual Total Nitrogen Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
kg N/ % of
Source yr total
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
Clear Run 4,605 16.0
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non-point load) - 18,415 64.0
c. Known municipal STP's -
Indian Lake Lodge 140 0.5
d. Septic tanks* - 2,345 8.1
e. Known industrial - None
f. Direct precipitation** - 3,280 11.4
Total 28,785 100.0
2. Outputs -
Lake outlet - Unnamed Stream
(B-l) 18,920
3. Net annual N accumulation - 9,865 kg.
* Estimate based on 220 lakeside dwellings; see Working Paper No. 175,
** See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
13
D. Mean Annual Non-point Nutrient Export by Subdrainage Area:
Tributary kg P/km2/yr kg N/km2/yr
Clear Run 5 548
E. Yearly Loading Rates:
In the following table, the existing phosphorus loading
rates are compared to those proposed by Vollenweider (Vollen-
weider and Dillon, 1974). Essentially, his "dangerous" rate
is the rate at which the receiving water would become eutrophic
or remain eutrophic; his "permissible" rate is that which would
result in the receiving water remaining oligotrophic or becoming
oligotrophic if morphometry permitted. A mesotrophic rate would
be considered one between "dangerous" and "permissible".
Note that Vollenweider's model may not be applicable to
water bodies with short hydraulic retention times.
Total Phosphorus Total Nitrogen
grams/m2/yr
Total
0.11
Accumul ated
0.05
Total
9.5
Accumul ated
3.2
Vollenweider loading rates for phosphorus
(g/m2/yr) based on mean depth and mean
hydraulic retention time of Indian Lake:
"Dangerous" (eutrophic rate) 0.44
"Permissible" (oligotrophic rate) 0.22
-------
14
V. LITERATURE REVIEWED
Kimmel, Clair (Operator), 1975. Personal communication (point
sources impacting Indian Lake). Central City STP, Central
City.
Ulanoski, James, 1974. Personal communication (lake morphemetry),
PA Dept. of Env. Resources, Harrisburg.
Vollenweider, R. A., and P. J. Dillon, 1974. The application of
the phosphorus loading concept to eutrophication research.
Natl. Res. Council of Canada Publ. No. 13690, Canada Centre
for Inland Waters, Burlington, Ontario.
-------
15
VII. APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
CONVERSION FACTORS
-------
CONVERSION FACTORS '
Hectares x 2.471 = acres
Kilometers x 0.6214 = miles
Meters x 3.281 = feet
-4
Cubic meters x 8.107 x 10 = acre/feet
Square kilometers x 0.3861 = square miles
Cubic meters/sec x 35.315 = cubic feet/sec
Centimeters x 0.3937 = inches
Kilograms x 2.205 = pounds
Kilograms/square kilometer x 5.711 = Ibs/square mile
-------
APPENDIX B
LAKE RANKINGS
-------
LAKES RANKED BY INDEX NOS.
HANK LAKE CODE LAKE NAME
1 4224
2 4220
3 4222
4 4228
5 4227
6 4223
7 3641
8 4229
9 4221
10 4219
11 4204
12 4226
13 4213
14 4216
15 4225
16 4201
17 4207
LAKE NAOMI
BELT2VILLE DAM
HARVEY*S LAKE
STILLWATER LAKE
POCONO LAKE
INDIAN LAKE
ALLEGHENY R&SERVOIR
LAKE WALLENPAUPACK
CANADOHTA LAKE
BEAVER RUN RESERVOIR
CONNEAUT LAKE
PINCHOT LAKE
PYMATUNING RESERVOIR
SHENANGO RIVER RESERVOIR
ONTELAUNEE DAM
BLANCHARD RESERVOIR
GREENLANE DAM
INDEX NO
445
423
413
401
389
383
3B5
371
369
360
307
256
206
157
101
85
53
-------
or LAKES JITri HIGHER VALUES (NUMBER OF LAKES WITH HlGHEn VALUES)
LAKE
CODE LAKE NAME
3to4l ALLEGHENY RESERVOIR
4201 6LANCHARO RESERVOIR
4204 CONNEAUT LAKE
4207 GREENLANE DAM
<.213 PYMATUNING RESERVOIR
4216 SHENANGO RIVER RESERVOIR
4219 BEAVER RUN RESERVOIR
4220 8ELTZV1LLE DAM
4221 CANADOHTA LAKE
4222 HARVEY«S LAKE
4223 INDIAN LAKE
4224 LAKE NAOMI
4225 ONTELAUNEE DAM
422b PINCHOT LAKE
4227 POCONO LAKE
4226 STILLWATErt LAKE
4229 LAKE WALLENPAUPACK
MEDIAN
TOTAL P
56 <
13 (
44 <
6 (
0 (
19 (
94 (
88 (
50 (
63 <
100 (
81 (
25 (
31 (
38 <
72 (
72 (
9)
2)
7)
1)
0)
3)
15)
14)
B)
10)
16)
13)
4)
5)
6)
11)
11)
MEDIAN
1NOHG N
38 (
13 (
63 (
6 <
72 (
44 (
19 (
25 <
97 (
81 <
31 (
88 (
0 (
56 (
97 I
72 (
50 (
6)
2)
10)
1)
11)
7)
3)
4)
IS)
13)
S)
14)
0)
9)
15)
11)
8)
500-
MEAN SEC
63 (
25 (
69 1
19 (
6 <
13 (
88 (
94 (
56 (
100 <
75 <
44 <
0 (
31 (
50 (
38 (
81 (
10)
4)
11)
3)
1)
2)
14)
15)
9) '
16)
12)
7)
0)
5)
8)
6)
13)
MEAN
CHLOHA
100 (
31 (
56 <
13 <
0 (
6 (
81 (
94 (
19 (
63 (
75 (
69 <
44 (
38 (
88 (
25 <
50 (
16)
5)
9)
2)
0)
1)
13)
15)
3)
10)
12)
11)
7)
6)
14)
4)
8)
15-
MIN DO
69
3
34
3
100
47
19
34
59
47
19
88
19
81
75
94
59
< 11)
( 0)
( 5)
( 0)
< 16)
( 7)
( 2)
< 5)
< 9)
< 7)
< 2)
( 14)
< 2)
C 13)
( 12)
( 15)
( 9)
MEDIAN
01SS H
59 (
0 (
41 (
6 I
28 (
28 <
59 {
88 (
88 (
59 <
88 (
75 (
13 <
19 (
41 (
100 <
59 (
8)
0)
6)
1)
4)
4)
8)
13)
13)
8)
13)
12)
2)
3)
6)
16)
8)
INDEX
NO
385
as
307
53
'206
157
360
423
369
413
388
445
101
256
389
401'
371
-------
LAKE DATA TO BE USED IN RANKINGS
LAKE
CODE LAKE NAM
3641 ALLEGHENY RESERVOIR
4201 BLANCHARO RESERVOIR
4204 CUNNEAUT LAKE
4207 GrIAN
INGrtG N
0.380
1.300
O.lbS
1.475
0.180
0.340
0.835
0.815
0.130
0.160
0.520
0.135
a. iso
0.245
0.130
0.180
0.250
500-
MEAN SEC
414.250
453.143
402.000
460.222
467.750
'463. b55
334. «33
362.444
436.000
338.000
400.222
443.333
470.667
453.000
438.800
449.000
394.583
MEAN
CHLOHA
3.700
15.187
7.567
24.011
56.333
26.bOO
5.183
4.856
19.167
5.967
5.211
5.533
11.783
13.950
4.980
18.233
9.617
15-
MIN DO
13.800
14.900
14.600
14.900
7.700
14.500
14.800
14.600
14,100
14.500
14.800
8.000
14.800
11.500
13.200
7.900
14.100
MEDIAN
OISS P
0.006
0.046
0.007
0.020
0.008
0.008
0.006
0.005
0.005
0.006
O.OOb
0.005
0.011
O.OOB
0.007
0.004
0.006
-------
APPENDIX C
TRIBUTARY FLOW DATA
-------
TRIBUTARY FLOW iNFOHMATION FOR t^tNNSYLVANl A
LAKE CODE 4223
INDIAN
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA OF LAKE(S(J KM)
67.6
SUB-DRAINAGE
TRIBUTARY AREA(SQ KM)
JAN
FEB
MAR
MAY
JUN
JUL
OCf
NJv
4223A1
4223B1
4223C1
422301
4223ZZ
67.6
1.6
12.6
25.1
28.2
1.02
0.02
O.lb
0.26
O.bl
I.b3
0.02
0.22
0.34
0.74
2.b3
0.03
0.-+0
0.57
1.39
2.6J
U.uJ
0.37
U.b4
1.27
1.7u
0.02
0.2-*
0.40
u.W2
1.2/
u.02
U, lv
0. Jl
u.o2
J.^0
J.Ul
u.o^
U.I?
o.iy
0.2/
0. ul
U.Ob
U.lJ
U. 13
0.^1
0. 01
o.ut
U.U.-i
U.10
U.2rt
U.01
U.Os
U.1U
0. 1-*
0 .OS
U.UiT
u. i 3
0.^
G.-+I;
i.
67.-3
fi)T«L
FLO* OUT =
1-..27
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND UAILY FLOWS(CMS)
TRIHUTAKY MONTH YEAK
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
74
74
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
74
74
MtAN FLOW DAY
1.78
0.71
0.14
0.16
0. 14
1.27
l.SO
2.27
2.97
0.85
1.36
1. J3
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.02
0.03
0.03
0.02
0.02
0.02
19
17
Ib
12
9
14
11
9
13
10
10
14
19
17
15
12
9
14
11
9
13
10
10
14
FLO* D«Y
0.68
u.l3
u.02
rLOW DliY
-------
t-LOrf INFORMATION FOK HtNNSYLVAi-JiA
2/34/75
LAKE COUE
INDIAN LArst
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOrtS(CMS)
TKldUTAHY
4223C1
422301
4223^
MONTH YEAR
5
6
7
q
g
10
11
12
1
7
3
4
5
6
7
B
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
I
2
3
4
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
74
74
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
74
7<*
73
7J
73
73
7J
73
73
73
74
7<»
74
74
MEAN FLOW OAY
0 .25
0.11
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.19
0.22
0.31
0.40
0.13
0.20
0.19
0.40
0.19
0.06
C. Jo
U. Jib
0.31
0.34
0.69
0.23
'J. 3*
U.31
0.34
O.u7
O.v.8
0.07
C . f>?
0.7^
1.10
1.4-+
0.4?
0.65
0.65
19
17
li
12
9
14
11
9
13
10
10
14
19
17
15
12
9
14
11
13
10
10
14
17
Ib
12
9
14
11
S
13
lo
10
14
0.17
J.ll
O.C3
U. J2
u.ul
u. j3
0.12
0.26
0.37
0.10
o.^o
U.27
0.26
0.14
0.06
0.03
U.03
0.07
U.22
u.4<;
U .54
0.18
u.37
U.U4
u.o3
O.Ofl
U.40
0.99
1.27
0.31
I.o4
FLOW OftY
FLOW
-------
APPENDIX D
PHYSICAL and CHEMICAL DATA
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/01/27
422301
40 01 40.0 076 52 23.0
INDIAN LAKt
42111 PENNSYLVANIA
OATE
FROM
TO
73/04/23
73/07/25
73/10/04
ooulo
TIME DEPTH wATEH
OF TEMf
L>AY FEET
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
15
15
15
15
15
35
35
35
35
35
40
40
40
40
40
50
50
50
50
50
0000
0004
0015
0029
0040
0000
0005
0015
002S
0050
0000
0020
0030
0040
0055
CENT
11. B
11.6
10.9
7.4
6.7
22.9
22.9
22.7
13.5
U.O
17.9
16.9
11.4
8.9
7.9
ilEPALtS
00300
00
MG/L
10.5
10.9
lu.o
10.5
7.4
7.4
•*. a
o.a
e.o
7.4
0.4
0.2
W.4
00077
TWftNSP
SECCHI
INCHES
90
144
82
00094
CfvooCTvr
FIELD
M1CROMHO
115
110
110
110
110
100
10-*
104
do
72
90
92
79
Hi
96
J
00400
f H
su
7.10
7.10
7.10
7.10
7.10
5.90
0.00
B.90
5.90
5.70
b.40
b.2u
6.00
6.10
6.oJ
00410
T ALK
CAC03
Mb/L
12
11
12
13
14
10K
10i<
10K
10K.
10K
10K
10
13
19
19
2111202
005*
OU610
NH3-N
TOTAL
rttVL
0.09U
0.100
0.080
0.090
U.090
0.090
0.110
0.070
O.ObO
0.320
0.190
O.d70
0.320
O.b30
O.UbO
FEtT DEPTH
0002 =
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.200K
0.200K
0.200K
0.200K
0.200K
0.300
0.200K
0.200
u.300
0.600
0.600
0.500
0.700
0.900
1.300
00630
NO
0.270
0.05J
0.040
00671
PhOb-UlS
OMTflO
rtll/L f
0.006
u.005
u.00<«
0.005
0.006
o.oo;
o.oos
0.003
O.OOb
O.OOb
O.OOb
O.U06
U.005
0.003
0.007
00665 32217
DftTt TIME DEPTH PHOS-TOf ChLRPHYL
FrtOM OF A
TO OAY FEET MCi/L f UG/L
73/04/23 11 35
11 35
11 35
11 35
11 35
73/07/25 11 40
11 40
11 40
11 40
11 40
73/10/04 15 50
15 50
15 50
15 SO
15 50
0000
0004
0015
0029
0040
0000
0005
OU15
0025
0050
0000
0020
0030
0040
0055
a.0u5
0.005
0.005
0.005
U.004
0.013
U.010
0.013
a.ocrt
o.ooa
u.OOd
0.007
0.006
o.ooe
0.069
0.8
7.8
6.9
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STUHEF RETRIEVAL UATt 75/01/27
40 U2 <*b.O U7d 52 22.0
MO I AN LAftt,
42111 PtNNSrLVAMA
lu
DATE
FROM
TO
73/04/23
73/07/25
73/10/Ot
TIME
OF
•JAY
12 35
12 35
12 35
12 45
12 45
12 45
16 15
lt> 15
OtPTrl
FEET
UUOO
0004
OOlri
0000
0005
0011
0000
001<*
WAfL'K
TtMH
CtNT
14. b
14.5
b.5
23.5
23.4
23.2
17.^
17.2
00
MG/L
*.tt
10.2
7.8
7.6
8.a
7.0
HO 77
StCCHI
INCHti
CMJOCTVY
FlcLO
rtlCHOMHO
120
120
12C
1 10
109
110
100
11EPALES
3
HH
SU
6.90
fe.tt'J
6. J(i
7.00
6.30
7.10
6.60
6.3o
r AL^
CACU3
M(j/L
2111202
0015 FttT
UEPTri
15
10K
10K
10K
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
Mo/L
O.udO
o.oao
0.090
O.ObO
U.U40
0.060
a.170
a. 170
00625 00630
TOT H.JEL N02&N03
N N-TOTAL
MG/L Mb/L
00671
PhOS-OIS
OHTHO
MO/L P
0.200K
0.200K
0.200K
0.600
0.500
O.SOO
0.800
0.600
O.b40
0.530
0.500
0.260
0.240
0.250
0.160
0.150
0.003
0.003
0.006
0.004
0.006
0.006
0.006
KATE
FKUH
lu
73/04/2J
73/U7/2S
7 j/ la/01*
TIME
OF
UAY
1? 35
12 15
12 35
12 45
12 45
ii? <»5
16 15
DLf'TH
FEET
•jooo
000<*
OoltJ
0000
uuuS
iJOl 1
oooo
16 15 oiil'+
Lit'Ofeb
Hnoi-TuT
MG/L P
L .
-------
STORtT RETHIEVAL DATE 75/01/27
4H2303
40 02 25.0 078 51 4J.O
INDIAN LAKt
42111
DATE
FROM
TO
73/OW23
73/07/25
13/lQ/Ut
aooiu
TIME OtfTM WATER
OF TtMP
DAY FEET
13
13
13
13
13
13
U
13
IS
15
15
10
10
10
10
05
OS
05
05
25
?5
25
0000
000
-------
APPENDIX E
TRIBUTARY DATA
-------
HtTrtJEVAL DATE 75/02/uJ
4223A1
40 00 57.0 078 54 00.0
KriuAOb C^EEK
42u/* boMtrtStr co H«Y
U/iMlHAN LAKE
bt'C HU HKUb IN SMANKSVlLLt
2111204
0000 FEET
OATE
FHOM
TO
73/05/19
73/06/17
73/07/15
73/08/11
73/09/09
73/10/12
73/11/09
73/12/18
74/01/15
74/U2/ 10
74/02/27
74/0 J/ 10
74/03/24
74/04/ 15
00630 00625
TIME DEPTH NU2&N03 TOT KJEL
OF i*- TOTAL N
UAY FEET
15
10
13
14
08
14
13
13
1 j
13
14
13
14
13
10
00
00
10
50
10
50
30
50
15
15
20
00
45
MG/L
\t
0
0
u
0
0
0
(J
0
0
0
0
0
0
.HBO
.440
.400
.3 ftt
.336
.410
.420
. 3b8
.588
.530
.650
.552
.580
.520
MG/L
0.
1.
0.
1.
1.
0.
1.
0.
1.
0.
0.
1.
2.
0.
225
57U
440
980
200
550
200
900
100
700
800
700
100
300
00610 00671 00665
Nhl-N PnOS-DIb PHOb-TOT
TOTAL ORTHO
Mii/L
O.UbS
0.069
0.076
0.189
J.154
0.132
0.104
y.120
0.124
0.140
0.155
0.135
0.120
(J.080
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0*
0.
0.
0.
u.
0.
0.
0.
0.
v •
H MG/L P
0051^
005K
Ou5K
008
OOSK
014
016
008
005K
OO^K
010
OU5K
U05
005K
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
u
0
u
0
0
.Olb
.015
.020
.OlD
.020
.014
.085
.0 1 •>
.02u
.OObi
»ulo
.010
.005
.01 j
DEPTH
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
5TORET KETRIEVAL DATE 75/02/03
40 01 28.0 07e) 52 25.0
UlMNAMED CHEEK
t2 SOMEKSET CO rtWY
T/INUIAN LAKE
rtD 55063 B«UG .25 MI BELO DAM Of N LAKE
11EPALES 3111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
DATE
FROM
TO
73/05/19
73/0&/17
73/U7/15
73/Ott/ll
73/09/09
73/10/12
73/11/09
73/12/18
74/01/15
74/02/10
74/02/27
74/03/10
7t/ 03/24
74/04/15
00630 00625
TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL
OF N- TOTAL N
DAY FEET
16
10
13
14
09
14
It
14
14
13
15
12
14
14
CS
40
45
45
40
35
15
05
30
45
00
45
MG/L
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
J
0
0
0
.450
.340
.190
.120
.176
.154
.160
.232
.420
.368
.470
.410
t5 0.4bO
30
0
.410
MG/L
1.
2.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
I.
1.
0.
0.
260
400
270
360
750
700
300
800
tOO
600
400
100
700
400
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PMOS-OIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL OKTriO
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
c.
0.
0.
0.
080
OB4
030
040
062
067
116
100
095
125
120
135
105
077
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
u.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
p
005K
005K
005K
005K
005K
007
005K
005N
OOSK
005K
010
u05K
005
005K
MG/L P
0.005K
0.015
0.010
0.010
0,010
0.007
0.006
o.oiu
0.010
0.005K
0.025
0.025
O.OOSK
0.010
K VALUE KNOWN TO b£
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
KtrwiEVAL DATE 75/02/03
40 02 50.0 o/a
oo.o
40
.252
.40C
.bwrf
.360
.490
.430
.42u
.430
MG/L
3.150
0.380
2.730
1.330
0.740
0.250
1.050
0.400
l.bOO
0.400
O.hOO
2.700
0.300
0.500
U0610 00671 00665
NH3-N PrlOS-UlS PHUb-TJT
TOTAL ORFHO
Mti/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0 .
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
c.
Q.
13a
02b
0^4
063
036
037
038
036
068
045
050
12s
040
035
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
J.
0.
u.
0.
0.
0.
p
OObK
005K
005K
OObK
OObK
006
OObK
005K
00«
005K
010
OOb
005K
005K
Mli/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
u .
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
p
UO^K
U 10
0 lu
020
U4u
006
025
U0n
OOB
005K
OiiO
u lu
005K
005K
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 7B/02/03
•+223J1
40 00 35.0 v)7d 51 25.0
riOONt RUN
42 3UMERSLT CO HXY
r/INUlAN LAKE
U'^UKY RU BfVUG WT-S35 .25 MI E OF BOONE
11EPALES 2111204
4 OUOQ FEET DEPTH
DATE
FKOM
TO
73/U5/19
73/06/17
73/07/15
73/08/11
73/09/09
73/1U/12
73/11/09
73/12/ltl
74/01/15
74/o2/lw
74/J2/27
74/03/10
74/03/24
74/Ot/lS
00630 00625
TIME DEPTH 'MU2J.N03 TOT KJEL
OF IM-TOTAL N
DAY FEET
15
10
13
14
09
14
14
13
14
14
1<4
13
14
14
30
15
15
20
00
20
00
40
00
35
25
30
IS
00
MG/L
1
0
iJ
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.820
.399
.240
.410
.BIO
.110
.290
.267
.860
.208
.490
.490
.dtiO
.3b8
MG/L
2.
1.
2.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
2.
1.
0.
600
500
000
860
020
600
650
600
900
200
4i)0
000
300
600
00610 00671 0066S
NH3-N PH05-DIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL ORTHO
Md/L
0.
0.
a.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
880
147
170
220
730
115
096
066
510
05U
130
Ibu
300
110
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
G.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
p
OOSK
005K
OOSK
007
OOSK
OOSK
OOSK
005K
012
OOSK
010
005K
OOSK
OOSK
MG/L P
O.U15
0.020
0.015
0.012
0.1)10
0.010
0.1)30
0.010
O.U6U
O.OOb
0.035
0.013
O.Ulb
O.U15
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
KtlKlEVAL DAlc 75/02/10
422J21
40 03 00.0 07B 52 2f.Q
INLJlAN LAKtl LODGE
<+2 SOMMENbtT COUNT/
IVINI)I AN LAKE
INDIAN LAKE
llEHALEb
0000 FtET DEPTH
DATt
FKOM
TO
74/U3/16
74/J4/2**
74/Ob/30
T*/i)(y/ 30
cpm-
74/Ob/30
74/ JtJ/Otf
f,P(D-
7*»/uri/Od
74 /ov/ y*
7<*/ 09/28
(IMF DtPT
OF
LJAY Ft£T
11
10
09
UO
2"*
UU
(>.<*
11
22
00
45
30
00
00
00
00
00
00
•JU630 0062b
H i\lu->fc,NOj TUT KJEL
.^-TUTAL N
MG/L
25.200
2/.6GO
34.000
19.3UJ
J.3oO
lri.400
lu.OOO
MG/L
2.
3.
9.
3.
1.
2.
2.
000
40C
900
300
200
500
600
OublO 00671 0066b
NH3-N PHOS-DIS PhOb-TOf
TUfAL UPIHO
MG/L
0 . 1 3U
^.160
0.20(/
J.140
•j. JbtIK
0.26g
j.2b'J
MG/L P
3.600
2.600
5.900
J.OOU
O.VOG
K.7DU
2.200
FLOW CUIMOUIT
rtATE FLOw-MGO
MG/L H 1NST M6D MONTHLY
^
j
^
3
1
4
d
.bOO
.300
.you
.300
.100
.100
.40-J
0.003
0.0w3
O.OOb
O.OOr)
0.005
O.G09
0.004
O.OOb
O.OOb
TO
L Sr d£
LESS THAN INDICATED
------- |