U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
WORKING PAPER SERIES
REPORT
ON
FISHING CREEK RESERVOIR
CHESTER AND LANCASTER COUNTIES
SOUTH CAROLINA
EPA REGION IV
V
WORKING PAPER No, 430
CORVALLIS ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY - CORVALLIS, OREGON
and
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING & SUPPORT LABORATORY - LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
lirG.P.O. 699-440
-------
REPORT
ON
FISHING CREEK RESERVOIR
AND LANCASTER COUNTIES
SOUTH CAROLINA
EPA REGION IV
WORKING PAPER No, 430
WITH THE COOPERATION OF THE
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL
AND THE
SOUTH CAROLINA NATIONAL GUARD
JUNE, 1975
-------
CONTENTS
Page
Foreword i i
List of South Carolina Study Lakes iv
Lake and Drainage Area Map v
Sections
I. Conclusions 1
II. Lake and Drainage Basin Characteristics 4
III. Lake Water Quality Summary 5
IV. Nutrient Loadings 9
V. Literature Reviewed 16
VI. Appendices 17
-------
n
FOREWORD
The National Eutrophication Survey was initiated in 1972 in
response to an Administration commitment to investigate the nation-
wide threat of accelerated eutrophication to freshwater lakes and
reservoirs.
OBJECTIVES
The Survey was designed to develop, in conjunction with state
environmental agencies, information on nutrient sources, concentrations,
and impact on selected freshwater lakes as a basis for formulating
comprehensive and coordinated national, regional, and state management
practices relating to point-source discharge reduction and non-point
source pollution abatement in lake watersheds.
ANALYTIC APPROACH
The mathematical and statistical procedures selected for the
Survey's eutrophication analysis are based on related concepts that:
a. A generalized representation or model relating
sources, concentrations, and impacts can be constructed.
b. By applying measurements of relevant parameters
associated with lake degradation, the generalized model
can be transformed into an operational representation of
a lake, its drainage basin, and related nutrients.
c. With such a transformation, an assessment of the
potential for eutrophication control can be made.
LAKE ANALYSIS
In this report, the first stage of evaluation of lake and water-
shed data collected from the study lake and its drainage basin is
documented. The report is formatted to provide state environmental
agencies with specific information for basin planning [§303(e)], water
quality criteria/standards review [§303(c)]> clean lakes [§314(a,b)],
and water quality monitoring [§106 and §305(b)] activities mandated
by the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972.
-------
Beyond the single lake analysis, broader based correlations
between nutrient concentrations (and loading) and trophic condi-
tion are being made to advance the rationale and data base for
refinement of nutrient water quality criteria for the Nation's
freshwater lakes. Likewise, multivariate evaluations for the
relationships between land use, nutrient export, and trophic
condition, by lake class or use, are being developed to assist
in the formulation of planning guidelines and policies by EPA
and to augment plans implementation by the states.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The staff of the National Eutrophication Survey (Office of
Research & Development, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency)
expresses sincere appreciation to the South Carolina Department
of Health and Environmental Control for professional involvement,
to the South Carolina National Guard for conducting the tributary
sampling phase of the Survey, and to those South Carolina waste-
water treatment plant operators who voluntarily provided effluent
samples and flow data.
The staff of the South Carolina Bureau of wastewater and
Stream Quality Control provided invaluable lake documentation
and counsel during the Survey, reviewed the preliminary reports,
and provided critiques most useful in the preparation of this
Working Paper series.
Major General Robert L. McCrady, the Adjutant General of South
Carolina, and Project Officer Lt. Colonel John P. DuPre (Retired),
who directed the volunteer efforts of the South Carolina National
Guardsmen, are also gratefully acknowledged for their assistance
to the Survey.
-------
IV
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
STUDY LAKES
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
NAME
Clark Hill
Fishing Creek
Greenwood
Hartwel1
Keowee
Marion
Moultrie
Murray
Robinson
Saluda
Secession
Wateree
William C. Bowen
Wylie
COUNTY
Abbeville, McCor-
mick, SC; Colum-
bia, Elbert, Lin-
coln, McDuffie,
Wilks, GA
Chester, Lancaster
Greenwood, Laurens,
Newberry
Anderson, Oconee,
Pickens, SC;
Franklin, Hart,
Stephens, GA
Oconee, Pickens
Berkeley, Calhoun,
Claredon, Orange-
burg, Sumter
Berkeley
Lexington, Newberry,
Richland, Saluda
Chesterfield, Dar-
lington
Greenville, Pickens
Abbeville, Anderson
Fairfield, Kershaw,
Lancaster
Spartanburg
York, SC; Gaston,
Mecklenburg, NC
-------
• / JNORTH CAROLINA
YORK CO. /
CHESTERCb. r
FISHING CREEK RESERVOIR
Tributary Sampling Site
X Lake Sampling Site
" Sewage Treatment Facility
FISHING CREEK
RESERVOIR
**—> Direct Drainage Area Boundary
-------
FISHING CREEK RESERVOIR
STORET NO. 4503
I. CONCLUSIONS
A. Trophic Condition:
Survey data indicate Fishing Creek Reservoir is eutrophic.
However, since the mean hydraulic retention time of this water
body is a very short six days, it more closely resembles a slow-
moving river, and the term "over-enriched" may be a better de-
scription of the reservoir.
Fishing Creek Reservoir ranked tenth in overall trophic quality
when the 13 South Carolina lakes sampled in 1973 were compared
using a combination of six parameters*. All of the other lakes
had less median total phosphorus, dissolved orthophosphorus, and
inorganic nitrogen; all of the others had greater mean Secchi disc
transparency; but only one lake had less mean chlorophyll a_. How-
ever, the low concentrations of chlorophyll a_, the lack of trans-
parency (the mean Secchi disc depth was less than 1/2 meter), and
the high concentrations of nutrients indicate primary productivity
was light-limited rather than nutrient-limited. Survey limnologists
commented on the turbid water at each of the sampling stations and
times.
B. Rate-Limiting Nutrient:
The algal assay results indicate nitrogen limitation at the
time the sample was collected (09/22/73).
The reservoir data indicate phosphorus limitation in April and
* See Appendix 7\.
-------
2
nitrogen limitation in July and September. However, primary
productivity probably is light-limited rather than nutrient-
1imi ted.
C. Nutrient Controllability:
1. Point sources--The phosphorus contributions of point
sources accounted for an estimated 74.4% of the total load
reaching the reservoir during the sampling year. Three Char-
lotte, NC metropolitan area wastewater treatment plants con-
tributed 46.6%; Rock Hill, SC contributed 13.6%; and the eight
remaining plants collectively added 4.6% of the total load. The
indirect municipal sources discharging in the upstream Lake Wylie
drainage contributed an estimated 9.6% of the load.
The phosphorus loading of 53.03 g/m2 measured during the
sampling year is more than 16 times that proposed by Vollenweider
(Vollenweider and Dillon, 1974) as a eutrophic loading {see page
15). However, the mean hydraulic retention time of Fishing Creek
Reservoir is a very short six days, and it is not likely that
Vollenweider's model applies.
It is calculated that even complete removal of phosphorus at
the direct and indirect municipal point sources included in this
report would still leave a loading of 13.6 g/m2/year; and in view
of the probability that the primary productivity of the reservoir
is light-limited much of the time, it is not considered likely
t Working Paper No. 441.
-------
3
that point-source phosphorus control would result in a signifi-
cant improvement in the trophic condition of Fishing Creek Reser-
voir. However, point-source control would reduce the phosphorus
loading to downstream Wateree Lake* and Lake Marion**.
2. Non-point sources—The Catawba River phosphorus load
amounted to 19.8% of the total. The other three gaged tribu-
taries collectively contributed 5.4% of the total load, and the
minor tributaries and immediate drainage contributed an esti-
mated 0.3%.
The phosphorus export rate of Cane Creek was much higher than
the rates of the other tributaries (see page 14). This high rate
may have resulted in part from underestimation of the phosphorus
load from the Lancaster wastewater treatment plant and in part
from the individually small loads contributed by privately-owned
domestic facilities in that drainage.
* working Paper No. 440.
** Working Paper No. 434,
-------
II. LAKE AND DRAINAGE BASIN CHARACTERISTICS7
A. Lake Morphometry :
1. Surface area: 13.64 kilometers2.
2. Mean depth: 5.4 meters.
3. Maximum depth: 27.3 meters.
4. Volume: 73.627 x 106 m3.
5. Mean hydraulic retention time: 6 days.
B. Tributary and Outlet:
(See Appendix C for flow data)
1. Tributaries -
Drainage Mean flow
Name area (km2)* (m3/sec)*
Catawba River 9,375.8 127.620
Unnamed Creek B-l 4.8 0.054
Cane Creek 388.5 4.440
Rum Creek 24.3 0.270
Minor tributaries &
immediate drainage - 60.9 Oj590
Totals . 9,854.3 133.074
2. Outlet -
Catawba River 9,867.9 133.070
C. Precipitation***:
1. Year of sampling: 124.6 centimeters.
2. Mean annual: 111.0 centimeters.
t Table of metric conversions—Appendix B.
tt Mast, 1974.
* For limits of accuracy, see Working Paper No. 175, "...Survey Methods,
1973-1976".
** Includes area of lake.
*** See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
5
III. LAKE WATER QUALITY SUMMARY
Fishing Creek Reservoir was sampled three times during the open-
water season of 1973 by means of a pontoon-equipped Huey helicopter.
Each time, samples for physical and chemical parameters were collected
from a number of depths at three stations on the reservoir (see
map, page v). During each visit, a single depth-integrated (4.6
m or near bottom to surface) sample was composited from the stations
for phytoplankton identification and enumeration; and during the
last visit, a single 18.9-liter depth-integrated sample was composited
for algal assays. Also each time, a depth-integrated sample was
collected from each of the stations for chlorophyll a_ analysis. The
maximum depths sampled were 11.0 meters at station 1, 4.9 meters
at station 2, and 4.6 meters at station 3.
The sampling results are presented in full in Appendix D and
are summarized in the following table.
-------
PARAMETER
TEMP (C)
DISS OXY (HG/LI
CNDCIVY
TOT 0 (MG/L)
ORTHO P (MG/L)
N02*NO3 (MG/L1
AMMONIA (MG/L)
KJEL N (MO/L)
INORG N (MG/L)
TOTAL N (MG/L>
CHL^YL A (U'i/Ll
SECCHI (METERS)
A. SUMMAWY OF PHYSICAL AND
1ST SAMPLING ( 4/
3 SITES
MANGE MEAN
15.2 - 15.6 IS.3
7.6 - 8.2 7.5
53. - 60. 56.
7.1 - 7.3 7,?
10. - 12. 10.
0.133 - 0.294 0.17ft
0.024 - 0.033 0.029
0.290 - 0.3SO 0.316
0.170 - 0.310 0.241
3.400 - 1.303 0.618
0.480 - 0.600 0.557
0.7*0 - 1.590 0.935
2.3 - 2.5 2.4
0.1 - 0.1 0.1
CHEMICAL CHARACTEHISTICS FOR
STOHET COOE
-------
B. .Biological Characteristics:
1. Phytoplankton -
Sampling
Date
04/02/73
07/06/73
09/22/73
2. Chlorophyll a_ -
Sampling
Date
04/02/73
07/06/73
09/22/73
Dominant
Genera
1. Cryptomonas sp_.
2. Melosira S£.
3. Aphamzomenon sp.
4. Nitzschia sp.
Total
1. Melosira sp.
2. Flagellates
3. Nitzschia sp.
4. Merismopedia sp.
5. Scenedesmus sp.
Other genera
Total
1. Scenedesmus sp.
2. Melosira sp.
3. Cyclotella sp.
4. Nitzschia sp.
5. Cryptomonas sp.
Other genera
Total
Station
Number
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
Algal Units
per ml
115
86
57
29
287
119
92
79-
39
39
287
655
168
105
96
40
40
202
651
Chlorophyll
(yg/1)
2.3
2.5
2.5
4.5
2.8
1.9
4.5
2.3
2.0
-------
Ortho P
Cone, (mg/ll
0.037
0.047
0.057
0.087
0.062
0.087
0.037
Inorganic N
Cone. Cmg/U
0.264
0.264
0.264
0.264
0.764
1.264
1.264
Maximum yield
(mg/l-dry wt.
6.5
8.0
7.4
7.8
16.9
29.2
11.6
8
C. Limiting Nutrient Study:
1. Autoclaved, filtered, and nutrient spiked -
Spike (mg/lj
Control
0.010 P
0.020 P
0.050 P
0.025 P + 0.5 N
0.050 P + 1.0 N
1.0 N
2. Discussion -
The control yield of the assay alga, S e_le_nast r urn cap ri -
cornutum, indicates that the potential primary productivity
of Fishing Creek Reservoir was high at the time the sample
was collected (09/22/73). The lack of significant increase
in yields with increases in phosphorus, as well as the sig-
nificant increase in yield when nitrogen alone was added,
indicates nitrogen limitation.
The reservoir data indicate phosphorus limitation in
April and nitrogen limitation in July and September (the mean
inorganic nitrogen/orthophosphorus ratios were 19/1, 9/1,
and 5/1, respectively). However, primary productivity in
the reservoir probably is light-limited rather than nutrient-
limited.
-------
IV. NUTRIENT LOADINGS
(See Appendix E for data)
For the determination of nutrient loadings, the South Carolina
National Guard collected monthly near-surface grab samples from
each of the tributary sites indicated on the map (page v), except
for the high runoff month of January when two samples were collected.
Sampling was begun in February, 1973, and was completed in February,
1974.
Through an interagency agreement, stream flow estimates for the
year of sampling and a "normalized" or average year were provided by
the South Carolina District Office of the U.S. Geological Survey for the
tributary sites nearest the lake.
In this report, nutrient loads for sampled tributaries were
determined by using a modification of a U.S. Geological Survey computer
program for calculating stream loadings*. Nutrient loads shown are
those measured minus point-source loads, if any.
Nutrient loads for unsampled "minor tributaries and immediate
drainage" ("II" of U.S.G.S.) were estimated using the nutrient loads
in Rum Creek at station D-l, in kg/km2/year, and multiplying by the
II area in km2.
The indirect municipal point-source loads leaving upstream Lake
Wylie** were calculated by multiplying the nutrient loads leaving
that lake (176,385 kg P and 2,753,045 kg N) by the fractions of the
total nutrient loads contributed by the municipal point sources (0.395
* See Working Paper No. 175.
** Working Paper No. 441.
-------
10
for P and 0.077 for N).
The operator of the Rock Hill wastewater treatment plant provided
monthly effluent samples and corresponding flow data. The operators
of the other listed municipal plants did not participate in the Survey,
and nutrient loads were estimated at 1.134 kg P and 3.401 kg N/capita/year.
A. Waste Sources:
1. Known South Carolina municipal -
Name
Fort Lawn*
Fort Mill
Jackson*
#2
#3
Lancaster
Rock Hill*
Pop.
Served
210
3,637
744
154
22,000
33,000
Mean Flow
Treatment (m3/d)
stab, pond 79.5
stab, pond 734.3
Imhoff 499.6
Imhoff 34.1
act. sludge 8,327.0
act. sludge 41,320.8
Receiving
Water
Unnamed Creek B-l
Steel e Creek
Steel e Creek
Steel e Creek
Cane Creek
Manchester Creek
In addition, there are 14 privately-owned domestic waste treat-
ment facilities with a combined flow of 870 m3/day; the nutrient
impact of these small facilities is not known but probably is rela-
tively insignificant.
2. Known North Carolina municipal** -
Name
Charlotte
Irwin Creek
Pop.
Served
Treatment
Mean Flow
(mVd)
88,700 act. sludge 37,698.6
McAlpine Creek* 63,380
Sugar Creek 145,180
act. sludge 40,688.8
act. sludge 55,526.0
Receiving
Water
Irwin Creek/
Sugar Creek
McAlpine Creek
Little Sugar Creek
Matthews
Mecklenburg
County
Waxhaw
1,350
470
550
cont. stab.
ext. aer.
Imhoff
548.8
177.9
68.1
Trib./McAlpi
Creek
Steel e Creek
Trib. /Twelve
Mile Creek.
t Fo'ley, 1976; Anonymous, 1971.
* Over 25% of the waste load is industrial.
** Anonymous, 1976.
-------
11
Domestic waste treatment facilities serving six schools and
a nursing home (combined flow of 206 m3/day) are located in the
Charlotte metropolitan area. The nutrient significance of these
small sources probably is minimal.
3. Indirect municipal - Fourteen municipal wastewater treat-
ment plants discharge in the drainage of upstream Lake Wylie. A
portion of the nutrients contributed by these plants reaches
Fishing Creek Reservoir via the Lake Wylie outlet and the Catawba
River.
4. South Carolina industrial* - Four industrial waste treat-
ment facilities of possible nutrient significance are located in
the South Carolina portion of the drainage (combined design flow
of 420 m3/day). The nutrient impact of these facilities is not
known.
5. North Carolina industrial** - Two industrial waste treat-
ment facilities of possible nutrient significance (chrome-plating
and dairy) are located in the Charlotte metropolitan area. However,
the combined flow of these facilities is only 61 m3/day, and the
nutrient impact probably is relatively insignificant.
* Foley, op. cit.
** Anonymous, 1976.
-------
12
B. Annual Total Phosphorus Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
kg P/ % of
Source yr total
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
Catawba River 143,335 19.8
Unnamed Creek B-l 30 <0.1
Cane Creek 38,320 5.3
Rum Creek 815 0.1
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non-point load) - 2,070 0.3
c. Known municipal STP's -
Charlotte (3 plants) 337,095 46.6
Fort Lawn 240 <0.1
Fort Mill (3 plants) 5,145 0.7
Lancaster 24,950 3.4
Matthews 1,530 0.2
Mecklenburg County 535 <0.1
Rock Hill 98,710 13.6
Waxhaw 625 0.1
Indirect sources 69,670 9.6
d. Septic tanks - Unknown ?
e. Industrial - Probably not significant
f. Direct precipitation* - 240 <0.1
Total 723,310 100.0
2. Outputs -
Lake outlet - Catawba River 662,045
3. Net annual P accumulation - 61,265 kg.
* See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
13
Annual Total Nitrogen Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
kg N/ % of
Source yj; total
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
Catawba River 4,778,135 71.9
Unnamed Creek B-l 1,855 <0.1
Cane Creek 228,805 3.4
Rum Creek 8,655 0.1
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non-point load) - 21,680 0.3
c. Known municipal STP's -
Charlotte (3 plants) 1,010,980 15.2
Fort Lawn 715 <0.1
Fort Mill (3 plants) 15,425 0.2
Lancaster 74,820 1.1
Matthews 4,590 <0.1
Mecklenburg County 1,600 <0.1
Rock Hill 273,335 4.1
Waxhaw 1,870 <0.1
Indirect sources 211,985 3.2
d. Septic tanks - Unknown ?
e. Industrial - Probably not significant
f. Direct precipitation* - 14,725 0.2
Total 6,649,175 100.0
2. Outputs -
Lake outlet - Catawba River 6,736,480
3. Net annual N loss - 87,305 kg.
* See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
14
Mean Annual Non-point Nutrient Export by Subdrainage Area:
Tributary kg P/km2/yr kg N/_kni2/yr_
Catawba River 15 510
Unnamed Creek B-l 6 386
Cane Creek 99 589
Rum Creek 34 356
-------
15
E. Yearly Loads:
In the following table, the existing phosphorus loadings
are compared to those proposed by Vollenweider (Vollenweider
and Dillon, 1974). Essentially, his "dangerous" loading is
one at which the receiving water would become eutrophic or .
remain eutrophic; his "permissible" loading is that which
would result in the receiving water remaining oligotrophic
or becoming oligotrophic if morphometry permitted. A meso-
trophic loading would be considered one between "dangerous"
and "permissible".
Note that Vollenweider's model may not be applicable to
water bodies with short hydraulic retention times.
Total Phosphorus^ Total Nitrogen
Total Accumulated Total Accumulated
grams/m2/yr 53.03 4.49 487.5 loss*
Vollenweider phosphorus loadings
(g/m2/yr) based on mean depth and mean
hydraulic retention time of Fishing Creek Reservoir:
"Dangerous" (eutrophic loading) 3.20
"Permissible" (oligotrophic loading) 1.60
* There was an apparent loss of nitrogen during the sampling year. This may
have been due to nitrogen fixation in the reservoir, solubilization of
previously sedimented nitrogen, recharge with nitrogen-rich ground water,
unknown point sources discharging directly to the reservoir, or (probably)
insufficient outlet sampling in relation to the very short hydraulic
retention time of the reservoir. Whatever the cause, a similar nitrogen
loss has occurred at Shagawa Lake, Minnesota, which has been intensively
studied by EPA's former National Eutrophication and Lake Restoration Branch
(Malueg, et al., 1975).
-------
16
LITERATURE REVIEWED
Anonymous, 1971. Inventory of municipal waste facilities. EPA
Publ. OWP-1, vol. 4, Wash., DC.
Anonymous, 1976. Water quality management plan-Catawba River basin,
sub-basin 34. Div. Env. Mgt., NC Dept. of Nat. & Econ. Resources,
Raleigh.
Foley, John R., 1976. Personal communication (permitted point sources
in Fishing Creek Reservoir drainage). SC Dept. Health & Env.
Contr., Columbia.
Malueg, Kenneth W., D. Phillips Larsen, Donald W. SchuHs, and
Howard T. Mercier; 1975. A six-year water, phosphorus, and
nitrogen budget for Shagawa Lake, Minnesota. Jour. Environ.
Qual., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 236-242.
Mast, G. Nelson, 1974. Personal communication (lake morphometry).
SC Dept. Health & Env. Contr., Columbia.
Vollenweider, R. A., and P. J. Dillon, 1974. The application of
the phosphorus loading concept to eutrophication research.
Natl. Res. Council of Canada Publ. No. 13690, Canada Centre
for Inland Waters, Burlington, Ontario.
-------
VI. APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
LAKE RANKINGS
-------
LAKE DATA TO 3E USED IN RANKINGS
LAKE
CODE LAKE NAME
4503 FISHING C^EEK
4504 LAKE GREENWOOD
4505 LAK£ HARTwELL
4506 LAKE MARION
i.507 LAKE MURRAY
4503 LAKE ^OSINSOM
4510 LAKE WATEREE
4511 LAKE WYLIE
4513 LAKE MOULTKIE
4513 LAKE KEOWEE
4514 LAKE SECESSION
4515 SALUDA LAKE
4516 LAKE WILLIAM C. BOWEN
MEDIAN
TOTAL P
0.143
0.061
0.013
0.055
0.024
0.014
0.094
0.045
0.026
0.008
0.057
0.046
0.023
MEDIAN
INORG N
O.b35
0.470
0.130
0.280
0.260
0.260
0.450
0.380
0.200
0.170
0.355
0.230
0.360
500-
MEAN SEC
483.000
463.917
•+22.000
470.176
424.905
458.778
475.667
462.222
455.36.
371.750
462.778
476.833
459.889
MEAN
CHLOHA
2.811
8. ISO
6.157
8.728
6.4':8
a. 611
8.408
5.42?
d.BOO
2.d33
10.722
1.517
3.911
15-
M]N DC
10.20C
15.000
15.000
14.90C
15.000
It, 000
14. 100
14.600
11.200
15.000
15.000
10.800
15.000
MEDIAN
DISS OHInO P
0.051
0.01 1
0.004
0.010
0.007
0.005
0.034
0.013
O.OOb
0.003
0.006
0.006
0.007
-------
PERCENT OF LAKES WITH HIGHE« VALUES (NUH6ES Of LAKES *ITH HlGHE^ VALUES)
LAKE
CODE LAKE NAME
4503 FISHING CHEEK
4504 LAKE (5R£EN*OOL>
4505 LAKE HARTrfELL
4506 LAKE MARION
4507 LAKE MURftAt
4508 LAKE ROBINSON
4510 LAKE WATEKEE
4511 LAKE WYLIE
4512 LAKE MOULTRIE
4513 LAKE KEOWEE
4514 LAKE SECESSION
4515 SALJOA LAKE
4516 LAKE WILLIAM C
MEDIAN
TOTAL P
0
17
92
33
67
fl3
6
50
58
100
?5
42
75
( 0)
( 2)
( 11)
( 4)
< 8)
( 10)
( 1>
< 6)
( 7)
( 12>
I 3>
< 5>
( 9)
MEDIAN
INOHG N
0 (
P (
100 (
50 (
62 <
62 I
17 (
25 <
83 I
92 (
4? (
75 (
33 (
0)
1)
12)
6)
7)
7)
2)
3>
10)
11)
5)
9)
4>
500-
MEAN SEC
0 (
33 (
92 (
25 (
83 (
67 (
17 (
SO (
75 (
100 (
42 <
6 (
5b c
0)
4)
11)
3>
10)
8)
2)
61
9)
12)
5)
1)
7)
MEAN
CHLORA
92 <
42 1
58 1
17 <
50 <
25 I
33 <
67 <
8 <
83 <
0 <
100 I
75 (
11)
5)
7)
2)
6)
3)
4)
8)
1)
10)
0)
12)
9)
15-
MIN 00
100 <
11 (
21 <
50 (
21 (
75 (
67 (
58 (
83 (
21 (
11 (
92 <
21 <
12)
0)
0)
6)
0)
9)
8)
7)
10)
0)
0)
11)
0)
MEOUN
OISS OrfTHO P
0 (
25 (
92 I
33 (
46 (
' 83 (
8 (
17 t
71 (
100 <
58 (
71 (
46 (
0)
3)
11)
4)
5)
10)
1)
2) '
a>
12)
7)
8)
S)
INUEX
NO
192
146
455
203
329
3*5
150
267
378
496
188
3t)8
308
-------
LAKES RANKED Bt INDEX NOS.
RANK LAKE CODE LAKE NAME INDEX NO
1 4513 LAKE KEOWEE 496
2 4505 LAKE HARTWELL 455
3 450S LAKE ROBINSON 395
4 4515 SALUOA LAKE 388
5 4512 LAKE MOULTRIE 378
6 4507 LAKE MURRAY 329
7 4516 LAKE WILLIAM C. BOWEN 308
8 4511 LAKE WYLIE 267
9 4506 LAKE MARION ?08
10 4503 FISHING CREEK RESERVOIR 192
11 4514 LAKE SECISSION 188
12 4510 LAKE WATEREt 150
13 4504 LAKE GREENWOOD 146
-------
APPENDIX B
CONVERSION FACTORS
-------
CONVERSION FACTORS
Hectares x 2.471 = acres
Kilometers x 0.6214 = miles
Meters x 3.281 = feet
Cubic meters x 8.107 x 10 = acre/feet
Square kilometers x 0.3861 = square miles
Cubic meters/sec x 35.315 = cubic feet/sec
Centimeters x 0.3937 = inches
Kilograms x 2.205 = pounds
Kilograms/square kilometer x 5.711 = Ibs/square mile
-------
APPENDIX C
TRIBUTARY FLOW DATA
-------
LAKE CODE 4503
TRIBUTARY1 FLO* INFORMATION FOR SOUTH
FISHING CHEEK RESERVOIR
04/27/76
TOTAL D&AlNAGt AHEA OF LAKE
JUN JUL AUG
OCT
NOV
DEC
MEAN
450 JA]
4503A2
4503H1
45UJC1
4503UI
45032Z
9867. 9
9375.8
4.3
3HH.5
34.3
60.9
169.64
163.67
o.oes
6.60
0.42
I.Ob
183.77
185.48
0.113
P. 81
0.5"*
1.39
191.97
194.25
0.113
9.91
0.62
1.56
185.47
174.43
0.085
6.54
0.40
1.02
134.68
116.95
0.03d
?.66
0.17
0.42
111.96
100,24
0.02S
2. OH
0.11
0.31
97.54
95.43
0.026
2.7B
0.17
0.42
104.04
102.51
0.028
2.B3
0.17
0.45
102.35
90.90
0.028
1.9B
0.11
0.31
99.24
84.95
0.023
2.29
0.14
0.37
111.V6
109.30
0.020
2.V4
0.17
0.45
11U.46
117.30
0,057
4.02
0.25
0.62
133.07
127.62
0.054
4.44
0.27
0.69
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA OF LAKE =
SUM OF SUB-DRAINAGE AREAS =
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FUOWS(CMS)
TRIBUTARY MONTH YEA*1
4503AI
MEAN FLOW DAY
4503A2
2
3
4
5
6
7
R
9
10
11
12
1
2
2
3
4
S
-------
LAKE CODE 4503
TRIBUTARY FLOW INFOKMATION FUR SOUTH CAROLINA
FISHING CREEK RESERVOIR
04/27/76
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILV FLOWS(CMS)
TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAH MEAN FLOH OAY
4503B1
45U3CI
450301
4S03ZZ
FLOW OAY
FLO* DAY
FLO*
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
IS
1
2
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
I
2
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
1?
1
2
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
Q
10
11
12
1
2
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
0.198
0.085
0.311
0.028
0.170
0.02S
0.028
0.038
0.02S
0.029
0.028
O.OS7
0.142
16.141
6.371
25.485
2.152
12.743
0.425
0.425
0.396
2.973
1.274
3.171
8.495
11.044
1.019
0.396
1.586
0.142
0.793
0,057
0.028
0.028
0.170
O.OB5
0.198
0.53B
0.6BO
2.530
0.991
3.964
0.340
l.-W
0.142
0.028
0.028
0.463
0.19rt
0.510
1.331
1.727
18
10
6
22
10
IS
12
20
21
10
19
13
19
18
10
a
22
10
15
12
20
21
10
19
13
19
18
10
B
22
10
15
12
20
21
10r
19
13
19
te
10
8
22
10
15
12
20
21
10
19
13
19
0.142
0.311
0.623
0.057
0.142
0.023
0.028
0.028
0.028
0.028
0.113
0,142
o.oas
12.035
25.485
42.475
1.926
11.468
.274
.218
.274
.076
.133
2.549
2.690
6.796
0.765
1.586
4.644
0.113
0.708
0.085
0.057
0.085
O.OS7
0.057
0.1 70
0.227
0.425
1.897
3.993
11.638
0.340
1.784
0.198
0,170
0.198
0.170
0.148
0.396
0.425
1.076
31
0.198
31
8.495
31
0.533
1.331
-------
APPENDIX D
PHYSICAL and CHEMICAL DATA
-------
STOrtET KETHIEVAL DATE 76/04/27
450301
34 36 08.0 080 53 25.0 3
FISHING CHEEK HESEHVOIR
45023 SOUTH CAROLINA
030691
DATE
FROM
TO
73/04/02
73/07/06
73/09/22
OAIE
FROM
TO
73/04/02
73/07/06
73/09/22
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAT FEET
08 30 0000
08 30 0006
08 30 0015
08 30 0025
03 30 0036
16 00 0000
16 00 0006
16 00 001S
16 00 0025
16 00 0034
15 10 0000
15 10 OOOS
15 10 0015
15 10 0025
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
08 30 0000
08 30 0006
OS 30 0015
08 30 002b
OB 30 0036
16 00 0000
16 00 0006
16 00 0015
16 00 0025
16 00 0034
15 (0 0000
15 10 0005
15 10 001S
IS 10 0025
00010
HATER
TEMP
CENT
15.6
15.6
15.6
15.5
30.3
29.5
27.9
27.5
27.3
27.2
27.0
26.3
26.3
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
a. 153
0.29
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/04/27
450302
34 40 13.0 080 53 06.0 3
FISHING CREEK RESERVOIR
45057 SOUTH CAROLINA
030891
11EPALES 2111202
0017 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
DATE
FROM
TO
73/04/02
73/07/07
73/09/22
DATE
FROM
TO
73/04/02
73/07/07
73/09/22
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
09 00 0000
09 00 0006
09 00 0013
09 35 0000
09 35 0006
09 35 0016
15 30 0000
IS 30 0005
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
09 00 0000
09 00 0006
09 00 0013
09 35 0000
09 35 0006
09 35 0016
15 30 0000
15 30 0005
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
15.2
15.2
15.2
27.5
27.5
27.3
27.7
26.4
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.142
0.147
0.151
0.112
0.092
0.085
0.104
0.130
00300
DO
MG/L
8.
8.
6.
6.
S.
5.
32217
00077 00094
TRANSP CNDUCTVY
SECCHI FIELD
INCHES MICROMHO
2
0
2
2
6
0
2 60
55
55
18 115
110
118
28 125
131
00400 00410
PH T ALK
CAC03
SU
7.30
7.30
7.30
6.80
6.80
6.60
6.80
6.40
MG/L
11
10K
10
16
17
17
25
27
00610 00625 00630 00671
NH3-N TOT KJEL N02&N03 PHOS-OIS
TOTAL N N-TOTAL ' ORTHO
MG/L
0.210
0.170
0.190
0.140
0.140
0.130
0.130
0.170
MG/L
0.600
0.500
O.SOO
0.400
0.600
0.500
0.700
0.600
MG/L
0.330
0.310
0.320
0.390
0.390
0.400
0.180
0.190
MG/L P
0.032
0.024
0.024
0.057
0.051
0.047
0*051
0.062
CHLRPHYL
A
UG/L
2.
2.
2.
5
8
3
'•"
K VALUE KNOWN w BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/04/27
450303
34 42 26.0 080 52 00.0 3
FISHING CREEK RESERVOIR
45023 SOUTH CAROLINA
030891
DATE
FROM
TO
73/04/02
73/07/07
73/09/22
DATE
FROM
TO
73/04/02
73/07/07
73/09/22
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
09 20 0000
09 20 0006
09 20 0013
10 10 0000
10 10 0006
10 10 0015
15 45 0000
15 45 0005
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
09 20 0000
09 20 0006
09 ?0 0013
10 10 0000
10 10 0006
10 10 0015
15 45 0000
15 45 0005
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
15.2
15.2
15.2
?7.9
27.8
27.7
27.2
26. 8
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.133
0.149
0.151
0.157
0.154
0.173
3.118
0.099
00300
DO
MG/L
7.8
7.8
5.6
6.4
7.0
7.0
32217
CHLRPHYL
A
UG/L
2.5
1.9
2.0
00077 00094
TRANSP CNDUCTVY
SECCHI FIELD
INCHES MICROMHO
2 60
55
55
12 116
118
116
27 115
115
11EPALES 2111202
0017 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00400 00410 00610 00625
PH
SU
7
7
7
6
6
6
7
6
.20
.10
.20
.80
.70
.80
.00
.70
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
12
11
11
20
21
20
22
23
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.210
0.220
0.220
0.220
0.270
0.240
0.070
0.080
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
O.SOO
0.500
0.400
0.800
O.SOO
0.500
0.400
0.400
00630
NO2&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.340
0.350
0.340
0.410
0.400
0.430
0.210
0.240
00671
PHOS-OIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.033
0.030
0.029
0.070
0.065
0.071
0.082
0.073
-------
APPENDIX E
TRIBUTARY and WASTEWATER
TREATMENT PLANT DATA
-------
KE.TR1EVAL DATE 76/04/27
4503A1
34 36 00.0 OflO 53 00.0 4
CATAfcdA KlVtR
<*5 7.5 GKEAl FALLS
0/FISHING C^EtK «ES 030891
HF 97 rtPDG BELO DAM
llffPALFS 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
DATt
FROM
ro
73/02/18
73/03/10
73/04/08
73/05/22
73/06/10
73/U//lb
73/08/12
73/59/80
73/10/21
73/11/10
73/12/19
74/01/13
74/01/31
7^/02/19
00630 00625
TIME DEPTH N02^N03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TOTAL N
DAY FEET
09
11
10
10
13
09
11
11
10
14
13
10
12
35
?5
15
30
?0
55
05
00
00
10
30
00
30
HG/L
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.294
.290
.290
.240
.320
.270
.340
.220
.420
.490
.360
.440
.384
.364
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
1.
3.
0.
0.
0.
0.
4.
I.
1.
0.
1.
560
440
500
150
900
885
230
830
750
900
200
100
700
000
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PriOS-OIS PriOb-TOT
TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L
0.
0.
c.
0.
0.
').
0.
•3.
C.
0.
0.
0.
c.
0.
160
072
052
115
470
173
no
176
160
400
232
140
088
150
MG/L
0.
0.
C.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
(1.
0.
a.
0.
0.
p
066
058
048
048
067
053
050
048
132
132
140
084
072
085
MG/L P
0.160
0.145
0.140
0.120
C.145
C. 125
0.12S
0.130
0.210
0.190
0.200
0.160
C.190
0.210
-------
STO^Ef RETRIEVAL DATE 76/04/27
45Q3A2
34 42 30.0 080 52 30.0 4
CATAWBA RIVER
45 7.5 LANCASTER
I/FISHING CREEK RES 030691
ST RT 9 BRDG 1,5 MI W OF GRACE
11EPALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
DATE
FROM
TO
73/02/18
73/03/10
73/04/08
73/05/22
73/06/10
73/07/15
73/08/12
73/09/20
73/10/21
73/11/10
73/12/19
74/01/13
74/01/31
74/02/19
00630 00625
TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TOTAL N
DAY FEET
10
13
11
11
13
10
13
12
11
15
14
10
12
20
10
30
30
40
25
10
05
00
04
10
30
55
MG/L
0.290
0.320
0.240
0.240
0.350
0.200
0.260
0.220
0.560
1.510
0.330
0.440
0.440
0.430
MG/L
0.
0.
560
580
1.000
0.
1.
1.
0.
0.
0.
4.
1.
1.
1.
1.
580
980
260
?85
480
600
150
400
500
000
000
00610 00671 006b5
NH3-N PHOS-DIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L
0.
3.
C.
160
132
075
C.072
0.
C.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
470
170
058
078
180
410
200
128
144
120
MG/L
0.
0.
p
056
078
0.050
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
p.
0.
0.
069
097
048
060
240
340
088
080
068
060
MG/L r>
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.135
.140
.240
.105
.171
.085
.105
.130
.280
.420
.120
.135
.130
.130
-------
STORE.! RETRIEVAL DATE 76/OW27
4503dl
34 42 00.0 08C* 52 30.0 4
UNNAMED C^tEK
<»5 7.5 FOUT LAWN
T/FISHING CWEEK RES U30891
UNIMPWUVEO RO bRDG ,25 MI SE FORT LAWN
UEPALE5 211120<+
0000 FEET OEPTri CUASS UO
DATE
FROM
TO
73/02/18
73/03/10
73/04/08
73/05/2?
73/07/15
73/08/12
73/09/20
73/10/21
73/11/10
74/01/13
7>./01/31
74/02/19
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
11 15
1? 50
11 15
11 00
10 10
12 55
11 50
10 30
14 i»5
10 ?0
13 45
09 ?0
00630
N02&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.720
0.500
0.294
0.600
0.630
0.370
0.640
0.850
0.830
0.640
0.540
0.620
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.560
0.580
0.860
1.200
0,3
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 76/04/27
4S03C1
34 42 00.0 080 SO 30.0 4
CANE CREEK
45 7.5 LANCASTER
T/FISHING CREEK RES 030891
RO dRUG 1 MI ABOVE CONFLO WITH RUM CHEEK
11EPALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
DATE
FROM
TO
73/02/1B
73/03/10
73/04/08
73/05/22
73/06/10
73/07/15
73/08/12
73/09/20
73/10/21
73/11/10
73/12/19
74/01/13
74/01/31
74/02/19
00630 00625
TIME DEPTH N02**N03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TOTAL N
DAf FEET
08
10
09
10
12
09
10
10
09
13
13
09
13
15
45
50
10
50
00
45
45
40
SO
05
45
15
MG/L
0
0
0
0
9
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
.150
.132
.147
.310
.15*
.570
.350
.570
.900
.330
.224
.340
.156
.232
MG/L
0.750
0.880
1.380
0.790
4.300
l.flOO
2.400
2*000
3.100
3.200
1.000
1,300
0.900
1.000
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PHOS-OIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
p
I
0
0
0
0
.198
.160
.082
.126
.460
.350
.965
.860
.300
.680
.330
.294
.080
.145
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
p
100
058
056
115
044
140
305
336
0.870
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
300
15?
136
068
090
MG/L P
0
0
0
.195
.140
.140
0.210
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
.375
.220
.420
.**90
.20U
.800
.240
.300
.165
.183
-------
RETRIEVAL DATE
4SOJD1
34 tl 30.0 OHO 50 00.0 4
45 7.i LANCASTER
T/FISHJNG CREEK WES 030891
HO flKDG 1 MI AriOV CONFLU WITH CANE CKEEK
llL^ALES 2111204
0000 FEET UEPTH CLASS 00
DATE
FROM
TO
73/03/18
73/03/10
73/04/08
73/05/2?
73/06/10
73/07/15
73/58/12
73/OV/2U
73/10/21
73/11/10
73/12/19
7H/01/U
74/31/31
74/02/1 9
00630 00625
TIME DEPTH N02t»N03 TOT KJEL
Of N-TOTAL N
DAY FEET
09
10
10
10
1?
09
10
12
09
13
13
09
15
05
50
00
?fl
55
35
50
20
45
50
10
50
18
MG/L
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
J
0
0
c
0
.120
.084
.078
.168
.078
.090
.067
.054
.010K
.060
.112
.104
.100
.132
MG/L
0.
0.
1.
690
4RO
760
0.800
3.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
700
360
650
560
250
200
100
800
600
500
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PHOS-DIS PriOS-TOT
TOTAL OKTHO
Mlj/L
0.
3.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
260
048
154
094
350
091
061
052
031
036
36B
136
068
070
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
p
042
048
042
0.086
0.
0.
o.
0.
0.
0.
u*
0.
0.
054
036
035
052
015
020
064
056
045
MG/L P
0.070
0.095
0.09S
0.140
0.150
0.065
0.065
0.120
0.070
0.03S
0.110
0.09b
O.OrfS
t. LOl:
IN
lu Ht.
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/04/27
DATE TIME DEPTH N02&N03
FrtOM OF
TO UAY FEET
73/06/07 15 00
CP(T>-
73/06/08 15 00
73/10/11 08 30
<*503CA AS4503CA P030000
34 <»3 09.0 080 48 13.0 4
LANCASTER
45 7.5 LANCASTER
T/FISHING CHEEK RESEfiVOI 030891
BtAw CHEEK/CANE CREEK
11EPALES 2141204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
0630 00625 00610 00671 00665 50051 50053
&N03 TOT KJEL NH3-N PHOS-OIS PHOS-TOT FLOW CONuUIT
OTAL N TOTAL ORTHO RATE FLOW-MOD
G/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P MG/L P INST MGO MONTHLY
9.100 15.000 7.400 7.
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 76/04/27
DATE TIME DEPTH N02i.N03
FROM OF
TO DAY FEET
73/06/04
CP-
73/06/04
73/07/11
CP-
73/07/11
73/08/01
CP(TJ-
73/08/01
73/16/05
CP(T)-
73/10/05
73/11/06
CP < T) -
73/11/06
73/12/11
74/01/11
74/02/04
74/03/05
74/04/05
74/05/03
74/06/04
74/0//17
00 00
02 00
00 00
24 00
00 00
24 00
00 00
24 00
00 00
24 00
4503XA AS4503XA P033000
34 59 20.0 080 59 30.0 4
ROCK HILL
45 15 ROCK HILL
T/FISHING CREEK RES 030891
MANCHESTER CREEK
HEP ALES 2141204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
0630
:i.N03
OTAL
1G/L
1.600
0.040
0.140
0.060
0.050
0.270
0.240
0.040
0.080
0.040
0.120
O.OflO
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
15.000
17.600
18.000
26.000
16.500
21.000
12.500
18.000
13.000
18.000
1<).000
19.000
00610 00671
NH3-N PHOS-DIS
TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L MG/L P
2.160
0.082
0.058
0.200
0.096
1.540
1.600
0.170
0.140
1.450
0.050K
0.094
5.550
2.100
4.900
4.100
2.510
3.800
2.500
1.800
1.900
2.000
3.730
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
7.450
5.100
18.000
7.900
4.500
6.100
5.500
5.500
5.600
4.400
5.UOO
50051
FLOW
RATE
INST MOD
11.000
13.900
11.400
13.000
12.800
11.700
10.400
10.800
14.400
12.500
12.600
12.800
11.200
50053
CONDUIT
FLOW-MOD
MONTHLY
10.800
10.400
10.000
11.300
11.500
10.400
11.000
10.800
11.200
11.000
10.600
11.300
11.500
K VALUE KNOWN TO c!E
LESS TH/iN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/04/27
00630
DATE TIME DEPTH N02&N03
FROM OF N-TOTAL
TO DAY FEET MG/L
73/00/28 08 00
CP < T ) -
73/J6/2H 16 30
0.175
20.000
4503ZA P04503ZA P003637
35 01 05.0 080 56 30.0 4
FOUT MILL (JACKSON)
45 7.5 FORT MILL
T/FISHING CREEK HES 030891
STEELE CREEK/CATAWBA RIVER
11EPALES 2141204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
006?5
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
00671
PriOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
50051
FLOW
RATE
INST MGD
50053
CONOUIT
FLOa-MGD
MONTHLY
1.600
2.200
7.100
0.800
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/C4/27
00630
DATE TIME DEPTH N02t»N03
FROM OF N-TOTAL
TO DAY FEET MG/L
73/06/28 08 15
CP(T>-
73/06/28 16 25
0.100
17.000
4S03ZH IP4503Zd
35 01 05.0 080 56 JO.O 4
FOKT MILL (IMHOFF »2)
45 f.b FORT MILL
T/FISHING CKEEK *ES
STEELE CPEEK/CATAWBA
lltPALES 2141204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
^000744
030891
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
00671
PnOS-UIS
0»T HO
MG/L P
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
b0051
8.000
3.700
6.000
INST MGD
0.125
500b3
CONDUIT
FLOw-MGD
MONTHLY
0.144
-------
RETRIEVAL DATE 76/04/27
4503^C IP4503ZC P000154
35 01 05.0 080 56 30.0 4
FORT MILL UMHOFF «3)
45 7.S FORT MILL
T/FISHIN& CKEEK RES 030891
STEELE CREEK/CATAUBA RIVER
11EPALES 2141204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
DATE
FROM
TO
TIME
OF
DAY
DEPTH
FF.ET
00630
N02S.N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
00671
PMOS-OIS
00665
PHOS-TOT
OP-THO
MG/L
P
MG/L P
50051
FLOW
RATE
INST
MOD
50053
CONDUIT
FLO«-MGD
MONTHLY
73/06/28 08 30
CP
------- |