U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
WORKING PAPER SERIES
REPORT
ON
WTERE LAKE
FAIRFIELD, KERSHAW, AND LANCASTER COUNTIES
SOUTH CAROLINA
EPA REGION IV
WORKING PAPER No, W)
CORVALLIS ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY - CORVALLIS, OREGON
and
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING & SUPPORT LABORATORY - LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
•&G.P.O. 699-440
-------
REPORT
ON
LAKE
FAIRFIELD, KERSHAW, AND LANCASTER COUNTIES
SOUTH CAROLINA
EPA REGION IV
WORKING PAPER No, W)
WITH THE COOPERATION OF THE
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL
AND THE
SOUTH CAROLINA NATIONAL GUARD
JUNE, 1975
-------
CONTENTS
Page
Foreword i i
List of South Carolina Study Lakes iv
Lake and Drainage Area Map v
Sections
I. Conclusions 1
II. Lake and Drainage Basin Characteristics 4
III. Lake Water Quality Summary 5
IV. Nutrient Loadings 9
V. Literature Reviewed 16
VI. Appendices 17
-------
11
FOREWORD
The National Eutrophication Survey was initiated in 1972 in
response to an Administration commitment to investigate the nation-
wide threat of accelerated eutrophication to freshwater lakes and
reservoirs.
OBJECTIVES
The Survey was designed to develop, in conjunction with state
environmental agencies, information on nutrient sources, concentrations,
and impact on selected freshwater lakes as a basis for formulating
comprehensive and coordinated national, regional, and state management
practices relating to point-source discharge reduction and non-point
source pollution abatement in lake watersheds.
ANALYTIC APPROACH
The mathematical and statistical procedures selected for the
Survey's eutrophication analysis are based on related concepts that:
a. A generalized representation or model relating
sources, concentrations, and impacts can be constructed.
b. By applying measurements of relevant parameters
associated with lake degradation, the generalized model
can be transformed into an operational representation of
a lake, its drainage basin, and related nutrients.
c. With such a transformation, an assessment of the
potential for eutrophication control can be made.
LAKE ANALYSIS
In this report, the first stage of evaluation of lake and water-
shed data collected from the study lake and its drainage basin is
documented. The report is formatted to provide state environmental
agencies with specific information for basin planning [§303(e)], water
quality criteria/standards review [§303(c)], clean lakes [§314(a,b)],
and water quality monitoring [§106 and §305(b)] activities mandated
by the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972.
-------
Ill
Beyond the single lake analysis, broader based correlations
between nutrient concentrations (and loading) and trophic condi-
tion are being made to advance the rationale and data base for
refinement of nutrient water quality criteria for the Nation's
freshwater lakes. Likewise, multivariate evaluations for the
relationships between land use, nutrient export, and trophic
condition, by lake class or use, are being developed to assist
in the formulation of planning guidelines and policies by EPA
and to augment plans implementation by the states.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The staff of the National Eutrophication Survey (Office of
Research & Development, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency)
expresses sincere appreciation to the South Carolina Department
of Health and Environmental Control for professional involvement,
to the South Carolina National Guard for conducting the tributary
sampling phase of the Survey, and to those South Carolina waste-
water treatment plant operators who voluntarily provided effluent
samples and flow data.
The staff of the South Carolina Bureau of Wastewater and
Stream Quality Control provided invaluable lake documentation
and counsel during the Survey, reviewed the preliminary reports,
and provided critiques most useful in the preparation of this
Working Paper series.
Major General Robert L. McCrady, the Adjutant General of South
Carolina, and Project Officer Lt. Colonel John P. DuPre (Retired),
who directed the volunteer efforts of the South Carolina National
Guardsmen, are also gratefully acknowledged for their assistance
to the Survey.
-------
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
STUDY LAKES
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
NAME
Clark Hill
Fishing Creek
Greenwood
Hartwel1
Keowee
Marion
Moultrie
Murray
Robinson
Saluda
Secession
Wateree
William C. Bowen
Wylie
COUNTY
Abbeville, McCor-
mick, SC; Colum-
bia, Elbert, Lin-
coln, McDuffie,
Wilks, GA
Chester, Lancaster
Greenwood, Laurens,
Newberry
Anderson, Oconee,
Pickens, SC;
Franklin, Hart,
Stephens, GA
Oconee, Pickens
Berkeley, Calhoun,
Claredon, Orange-
burg, Sumter
Berkeley
Lexington, Newberry,
Richland, Saluda
Chesterfield, Dar-
lington
Greenville, Pickens
Abbeville, Anderson
Fairfield, Kershaw,
Lancaster
Spartanburg
York, SC; Gaston,
Mecklenburg, NC
-------
l/\
f*
/en
\
\
>
<<•>
^el^X
V..
"A
>.#
*
:
/ &•'
'^i
'"»B1
WATEREE LAKT
® Tributary Sampling Site
X Lake Sampling Site
f Sewage Treatment Facility
f s 10 Km.
o 5Mi.
Scale
Map Location
f Camden
-------
WATEREE LAKE
STORE! NO. 4510
I. CONCLUSIONS
A. Trophic Condition:
Survey data indicate Wateree Lake is eutrophic. It ranked
last in overall trophic quality when the 13 South Carolina lakes
sampled in 1973 were compared using a combination of six param-
eters*. Eleven of the other lakes had less median total phos-
phorus and dissolved orthophosphorus, ten had less median inorganic
nitrogen, eight had less mean chlorophyll a_, and ten had greater
mean Secchi disc transparency. Marked depression of dissolved oxy-
gen with depth occurred at sampling stations 1 and 2 in July and
at station 1 in September.
Survey limnologists did not observe any macrophytes or sur-
face concentrations of algae during sampling visits.
B. Rate-Limiting Nutrient:
There was a significant loss of nutrients in the assay sample
from the time of collection to the time the assay was begun, and
the results are not considered representative of conditions in the
lake at the time the sample was taken (03/30/73).
The lake data indicate phosphorus limitation in March and July
and nitrogen limitation in September.
C. Nutrient Controllability:
1. Point sources—The phosphorus contributions of point-sources
* See Appendix A.
-------
2
amounted to an estimated 81.7% of the total load reaching Wateree
Lake during the sampling year. The municipal wastewater treat-
ment plants within the lake drainage collectively contributed 1.9%
of the total load.
The indirect municipal sources discharging in the upstream
Catawba River drainage accounted for an estimated 79.7% of the
load. This may be an overestimate to some degree because of the
possibility of some phosphorus entrapment in the two small reser-
voirs between the outlet of Fishing Creek Reservoir* and the
inlet of Wateree Lake (see map, page v). However, the hydraulic
retention times of these reservoirs are certain to be much less
than the 6-day retention time of Fishing Creek Reservoir in which
only 8.5% of the total phosphorus input was retained during the
sampling year.
The phosphorus loading of 11.13 g/m2 measured during the sam-
pling year is six times that proposed by Vollenweider (Vollenweider
and Dillon, 1974) as a eutrophic loading (see page 15). However,
the mean hydraulic retention time of Wateree Lake is a relatively
short 27 days, and Vollenweider's model may not be applicable.
It is calculated that 85% phosphorus removal at the direct and
indirect municipal point sources considered in this report would
reduce the loading to 3.4 g/m2/yr. While this is still nearly twice
the eutrophic loading, it is likely that the reduced loading would
result in persistent phosphorus limitation of primary productivity
See Working Paper No. 430.
-------
3
and at least some improvement in the trophic condition of
Wateree Lake. Point-source control would reduce the phos-
phorus loading to downstream Lake Marion* as well.
2. Non-point sources—The Catawba River phosphorus load
amounted to 15.7% of the total. The other six gaged tribu-
taries collectively contributed 1.5% of the total load, and
the minor tributaries and immediate drainage contributed an
estimated 1.1%.
The phosphorus export rates of Big Wateree and Cedar creeks
were somewhat higher than the rates of the other tributaries of
Wateree Lake (see page 14). However, no known point sources
impact either stream, and the higher exports appear to be the
result of differing land-use practices in the two drainages.
* Working Paper No. 434.
-------
II. LAKE AND DRAINAGE BASIN CHARACTERISTICS1"
A. Lake Morphometry1"^:
1. Surface area: 55.48 kilometers2.
2. Mean depth: 6.9 meters.
3. Maximum depth: >19.5 meters.
4. Volume: 382.280 x 106 m3. .
5. Mean hydraulic retention time: 27 days.
B. Tributary and Outlet:
(See Appendix C for flow data)
1. Tributaries -
Drainage Mean flow
Name area (km2)* (m3/sec)*
Catawba River 11,292.4 150.25
White Oak Creek 33.7 0.38
Beaver Creek 101.8 1.16
Cedar Creek 83.1 0.95
Big Wateree Creek 146.9 1.68
Little Wateree Creek 176.6 2.02
Dutchmans Creek 70.7 0.81
Minor tributaries &
immediate drainage - 341.8 3.90
Totals 12,247.0 161.15
2. Outlet -
Wateree River 12,302.5** 161.15**
C. Precipitation***:
1. Year of sampling: 125.2 centimeters.
2. Mean annual: 122.6 centimeters.
t Table of metric conversions—Appendix B.
tt Martin and Hanson, 1966.
* For limits of accuracy, see Working Paper No. 175, "...Survey Methods,
1973-1976".
** Includes area of lake; outflow adjusted to equal sum of inflows.
*** See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
5
III. LAKE WATER QUALITY SUMMARY
Wateree Lake was sampled three times during the open-water
season of 1973 by means of a pontoon-equipped Huey helicopter.
Each time, samples for physical and chemical parameters were collected
from a number of depths at four stations on the lake (see map, page
v). During each visit, a single depth-integrated (4.6 m or near
bottom to surface) sample was composited from the stations for
phytoplankton identification and enumeration; and during the first
visit, a single 18.9-liter depth-integrated sample was composited
for algal assays. Also each time, a depth-integrated sample
was collected from each of the stations for chlorophyll a_ analysis.
The maximum depths sampled were 19.5 meters at station 1, 9.1 meters
at station 2, 6.1 meters at station 3, and 3.0 meters at station 4.
The sampling results are presented in full in Appendix D and
are summarized in the following table.
-------
PARAMETER
TEMP (C)
OISS OXY (MG/L)
CNDCTVY (MCrtOMO)
PH (STAND UNITS)
TOT ALK (MG/L)
TOT P (MG/L)
ORTHO P (MG/L)
N02«N03 (MG/L)
AMMONIA (MG/L)
KJEL N (MG/L)
INORG N (MG/L)
TOTAL N (MG/L)
CHLWPYL A (UG/L)
SECCHI (METERS)
A. SUMMARY OF PHYSICAL AND
1ST SAMPLING ( 3/30/73)
4 SITES
RANGE MEAN MEDIAN
13.4 - 15.1 14.3 14.4
7.6 - 11.0 8.5 8.4
90. - 100. 92. 90.
7.0 - 7.3 7.2 7.2
10. - 35. 17. 16.
0.092 - 0.128 O.H2 0.111
0.034 - 0.043 0.040 0.040
0.360 - 0.480 0.392 0.380
0.150 - 0.190 0.168 0.16U
C.300 - 0.800 0.465 0.400
0.520 - 0.670 0.560 0.550
0.680 - 1.270 0.85? 0.790
2.3 - 6.2 3.7 3.2
0.3 - 0.5 0.4 .0.3
CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS FOR LAKE WATEREE
STOREf COOE 4510
2ND SAMPLING ( 7/ 6/73)
4 SITES
RANGE
23.5
0.9
85.
6.5
15.
0.045
0.007
0.070
0.060
0.200
0.140
0.360
6.5
0.3
- 30.9
9.5
- 110.
9.2
25.
- 0.125
- 0.047
- 0.330
- 0.480
- O.BOO
- 0.700
- 1.020
- 10.6
0.9
MEAN
27.9
4.7
99.
7.3
21.
0.086
0.026
0.199
0.174
0.459
0.373
0.658
9.1
0.7
MEDIAN
28.4
3.8
100.
6.9
21.
0.088
0.028
0.210
0.140
0.500
0.380
0.650
9.6
0.8
3RD SAMPLING ( 9/31/73)
4 SITES
RANGE MEAN MEDIAN
25.8 - 27.4 26.6 26.5
1.8 - 9.2 5.3 5.2
10X). - 113. 106. 108.
6.6 - 9.0 7.0 6.8
17. - 23. 20. 19.
0.032 - 0.144 0.059 0.047
0.015 - 0.052 0.029 0.027
0.040 - 0.230 0.160 0.180
0.060 - 0.250 0.149 0.140
0.600 - 1.600 0.815 0.700
0.110 - 0.440 0.309 0.300
0.720 - 1.640 0.975 0.890
9.8 - 16.5 12.4 11.6
0.5 - 0.9 0.8 0.8
-------
B. Biological Characteristics:
1. Phytoplankton -
Sampling
Date
03/30/73
07/06/73
09/21/73
2. Chlorophyll a_ -
Sampling
Date
03/30/73
Dominant
Genera
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Melosira sp.
Cryptomonas sp.
Flagellates
Dactylococcopsis sp,
Cyclotella SJD.
Other genera
Total
Melosira sjj.
Merismopedia SJD.
Nitzschia sp.
Oscillatoria sp.
Flagellates
Other genera
Total
Dactylococcopsis sp,
Anabaena sp.
Raphi chops is s£.
Cyclotella sp^
Flagellates
Other genera
Total
Algal Units
per ml
627
341
286
231
176
903
2,564
1,163
658
607
607
455
3.696
7,186
Station
Number
1
2
3
4
4,897
Chlorophyll
(ug/D
3.9
6.2
2.6
2.3
-------
Sampling
Date
07/06/73
09/21/73
Station
Number
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
Chlorophyll a_
(ug/D
8.8
10.4
6.5
10.6
12.4
10.9
16.5
9.8
C. Limiting Nutrient Study:
There was a significant loss of nutrients in the assay sample
from the time the sample was collected to the time the assay was
begun. Therefore, the results are not considered representative
of conditions in the lake at the time the sample was taken (03/
30/73).
However, the lake data indicate phosphorus limitation in
March and July (the mean inorganic nitrogen/orthophosphorus
ratios were 14/1 both times) and nitrogen limitation in September
(the mean N/P ratio was 11/1).
-------
IV. NUTRIENT LOADINGS
(See Appendix E for data)
For the determination of nutrient loadings, the South Carolina
National Guard collected monthly near-surface grab samples from
each of the tributary sites indicated on the map (page v), except
for the high runoff month of January when two samples were collected.
Sampling was begun in February, 1973, and was completed in February,
1974.
Through an interagency agreement, stream flow estimates for the
year of sampling and a "normalized" or average year were provided by
the South Carolina District Office of the U.S. Geological Survey for the
tributary sites nearest the lake.
In this report, nutrient loads for sampled tributaries were
determined by using a modification of a U.S. Geological Survey computer
program for calculating stream loadings*. Nutrient loads shown are
those measured minus point-source loads, if any.
Nutrient loads for unsampled "minor tributaries and immediate
drainage" ("II" of U.S.G.S.) were estimated using the means of the
nutrient loads, in kg/km2/year, at stations B-l, C-l, D-l, and F-l
and multiplying the means by the II area in km2.
The operator of the Winnsboro wastewater treatment plant provided
monthly effluent samples and estimated flows. The operators of the
other listed municipal plants did not participate in the Survey, and
the nutrient loads in treated wastes were estimated at 1.134 kg P and
3.401 kg N/capita/year. The nutrient loads in the untreated wastes
* See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
10
of Great Falls were estimated at 1.587 kg P and 4.263 kg N/capita/year.
The indirect municipal point-source loads leaving upstream Fishing
Creek Reservoir* were calculated by multiplying the nutrient loads leaving
the reservoir (662,045 kg P and 6,736,480 kg N) by the fractions of the
total nutrient loads contributed by the municipal point sources (0.744
for P and 0.240 for N).
A. Waste Sources**:
1. Known municipal -
Name
Chester
Great Falls (2)
Ridgeway #1
Rock Hill
Winnsboro
York #1
Pop.
Served
1,000
3,000
130
1,000
1,824
2,200
Treatment
tr. filter
none
septic tank
ext. aer.
aer. pond
tr. filter
Mean Flow
(m»/d)
832.7
3,709.3
49.2
1,714.6
567.8
1,892.5
Receiving
Water
Trib. /Rocky
Creek
Rocky Creek &
Catawba River
Trib. /Dutch-
mans Creek
Wildcat Creek/
Fishing Creek
McCulley Creek
Fishing Creek
In addition, there are 15 privately-owned domestic treatment
facilities in the Wateree Lake drainage (combined flow of 1,360
m3/day). The nutrient impact of these small facilities is not
known but probably is relatively insignificant.
2. Indirect municipal—Thirteen municipal wastewater treatment
plants discharge in the drainage of upstream Fishing Creek Reser-
voir, and indirect municipal sources in the Lake Wylie*** drainage
* Working Paper No. 430.
** King, 1974; Foley, 1976.
*** Working Paper No. 441.
-------
n
also impact the reservoir. A portion of these municipal loads
reaches Wateree Lake via the reservoir outlet and the Catawba
River.
3. Known industrial--Three industrial waste treatment plants with
a combined flow of 863 m3/day discharge in the Wateree Lake drain-
age. The nutrient contributions of these sources are not known
but probably are relatively small.
-------
12
B. Annual Total Phosphorus Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
kg P/ % of
Source y_r total
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
Catawba River 96,665 15.7
White Oak Creek 320 <0.1
Bea.ver Creek 975 0.2
Cedar Creek 2,250 0.4
Big Wateree Creek 4,555 -0.7
Little Wateree Creek 620 0.1
Dutchmans Creek 625 0.1
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non-point load) - 6,580 1.1
c. Known municipal STP's -
Chester 1,135 0.2
Great Falls 4,760 0.8
Ridgeway #1 145 <0.1
Rock Hill 1,135 0.2
Winnsboro 1,730 0.3
York #1 2,495 0.4
Indirect sources 492,560 79.7
d. Septic tanks - Unknown ?
e. Known industrial - Probably insignificant
f. Direct precipitation* - 970 0.2
Total 617,520 100.0
2. Outputs -
Lake outlet - Wateree River 462,785
3. Net annual P accumulation - 154,735 kg.
* See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
13
Annual Total Nitrogen Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
kg N/ % of
Source yr . total
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
Catawba River 2,232,795 54.3
White Oak Creek 4,775 0.1
Beaver Creek 17,220 0.4
Cedar Creek 18,650 0.5
Big Wateree Creek 23,055 0.6
Little Wateree Creek 37,135 0.9
Dutchmans Creek 10,750 0.3
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non-point load) - 59,130 1.4
c. Known municipal STP's -
Chester 3,400 <0.1
Great Falls 12,790 0.3
Ridgeway #1 440 <0.1
Rock Hill 3,400 <0.1
Winnsboro 2,290 <0.1
York #1 7,480 0.2
Indirect sources 1,616,755 39.3
d. Septic tanks - Unknown ?
e. Known industrial - Probably insignificant
f. Direct precipitation* - 59.895
Total 4,109,960
2. Outputs -
Lake outlet - Wateree River 4,512,345
3. Net annual N loss - 402,385 kg.
* See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
14
D. Mean Annual Non-point Nutrient Export by Subdrainage Area:
Tributary kg P/km2/yr kg N/km2/yr
Catawba River 9 198
White Oak Creek 9 142
Beaver Creek 10 169
Cedar Creek 27 224
Big Wateree Creek 31 157
Little Wateree Creek 4 210
Dutchmans Creek 9 152
-------
15
E. Yearly Loads:
In the following table, the existing phosphorus loadings
are compared to those proposed by Vollenweider (Vollenweider
and Dillon, 1974). Essentially, his "dangerous" loading is
one at which the receiving water would become eutrophic or
remain eutrophic; his "permissible" loading is that which
would result in the receiving water remaining oligotrophic
or becoming oligotrophic if morphometry permitted. A meso-
trophic loading would be considered one between "dangerous"
and "permissible".
Note that Vollenweider's model may not be applicable to
water -bodies with short hydraulic retention times.
Total Phosphorus Total Nitrogen
Total Accumulated Total Accumulated
grams/mVyr 11.13 2.79 74.1 loss*
Vollenweider phosphorus loadings
(g/m2/yr) based on mean depth and mean
hydraulic retention time of Wateree Lake:
"Dangerous" (eutrophic loading) 1.82
"Permissible" (oligotrophic loading) 0.91
* There was an apparent loss of nitrogen during the sampling year. This
may have been due to nitrogen fixation in the lake, solubilization of
previously sedimented nitrogen, recharge with nitrogen-rich ground water,
unsampled point sources discharging directly to the lake, or (probably)
insufficient outlet sampling in relation to the relatively short hydraulic
retention time of the lake. Whatever the cause, a similar nitrogen loss
has occurred at Shagawa Lake, Minnesota, which has been intensively studied
by EPA's former National Eutrophication and Lake Restoration Branch (Malueg
et al., 1975).
-------
16
V. LITERATURE REVIEWED
Foley, John R., 1976. Personal communication (permitted point
sources in Wateree Lake watershed). SC Dept. of Health &
Env. Contr., Columbia.
King, Robert, 1974. Personal communication (Great Falls waste-
water treatment plant). SC Dept. of Health & Env. Contr.,
Columbia.
Malueg, Kenneth W., D. Phillips Larsen, Donald W. Schults, and
Howard T. Mercier; 1975. A six-year water, phosphorus, and
nitrogen budget for Shagawa Lake, Minnesota. Jour. Environ.
Qual., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 236-242.
Martin, R. 0. R., and Ronald L. Hanson; 1966. Reservoirs in the
United States. Water Supply Paper 1838, U.S. Geol. Surv.,
Wash., DC.
Vollenweider, R. A., and P. J. Dillon, 1974. The application of
the phosphorus loading concept to eutrophication research.
Natl. Res. Council of Canada Publ. No. 13690, Canada Centre
for Inland Waters, Burlington, Ontario.
-------
VI. APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
LAKE RANKINGS
-------
LAKE DATA TO BE USED IN RANKINGS
LAKE
CODE LAKE NAME
4503 FISHING CREEK KESERVOH
4504 LAKE GREENrfOOO
4505 LAKE HARTwELL
4506 LAKE MARION
4507 LAKE MURRAY
4508 LAKE ROBINSON
4510 LAKE WATEREE
4511 LAKE XYLIE
4512 LAKE MOULTRIE
4513 LAKE KEOWEE
4514 LAKE SECESSION
4515 SALUDA LAKE
4516 LAKE WILLIAM C. BOWEN
MEDIAN
TOTAL P
0.143
0.061
0.013
0.055
0.024
0.014
0.094
0.045
0.026
o.ooa
0.057
0.046
0.022
MEDIAN
INORG N
0.535
0.470
0.130
0.280
0.260
0.260
0.450
0.380
0.200
0.170
0.355
0.230
0.360
500-
MEAN SEC
463.000
H63.917
422.000
470.176
H24.905
458.778
475.667
462.222
455.36.
371.750
462.778
476.833
459.889
MEAN
CHLOHA
2.811
8.150
6.157
8.728
6.4':8
8.611
8.408
5.422
8.800
2.d33
10.722
1.517
3.911
15-
MIN oc
10.20C
15.000
15.000
14.900
15.000
It. 000
14.100
14.800
11.200
15.000
15.000
10.800
15.000
MEDIAN
0155 ORTnO P
0.051
0.011
0.004
0.010
0.007
0.005
0.034
0.013
O.OOb
0.003
0.006
0.006
0.007
-------
PERCENT OF LAKES WITH HIGHEK VALUES
-------
LAKES RANKED Bf INDEX NOS.
RANK LAKE CODE LAKE NAME INDEX NO
1 4513 LAKE KEOwEE 496
2 4505 LAKE HARTHELL 455
3 4508 LAKE ROBINSON 395
4 4515 SALUDA LAKE . 388
5 4512 LAKE MOULTRIE 378
6 4507 LAKE MURRAY 329
7 4516 LAKE WILLIAM C. BOWEN 308
8 4511 LAKE WYLIE 267
9 4506 LAKE MARION 208
10 4503 FISHING CREEK RESERVOIR 192
11 4514 LAKE SECESSION 188
12 4510 LAKE WATEREt 150
13 4504 LAKE GREENWOOD 146
-------
APPENDIX B
CONVERSION FACTORS
-------
CONVERSION FACTORS
Hectares x 2.471 = acres
Kilometers x 0.6214 = miles
Meters x 3.281 = feet
-4
Cubic meters x 8.107 x 10 = acre/feet
Square kilometers x 0.3861 = square miles
Cubic meters/sec x 35.315 = cubic feet/sec
Centimeters x 0.3937 = inches
Kilograms x 2.205 = pounds
Kilograms/square kilometer x 5.711 = Ibs/square mile
-------
APPENDIX C
TRIBUTARY FLOW DATA
-------
TRIBUTARY FLOW INFORMATION KOR SOUTH CAROLINA
04/37/76
LAKE CODE 4510
WATEREE LAKE
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA OF LAKEISQ KM) 13302.5
SUB-DRAINAGE
TRIBUTARY AREA(SQ KM>
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
NORMALIZED FLOWS(CMS)
JUN JUL AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
DEC
MEAN
4510A1
4510H1
4510C1
4510D1
4510E.1
4510F1
4510G1
4510H1
4510ZZ
12302.5
33.7
101.8
83.1
11292.4
146.9
176.6
70.7
341.9
210.96
0.57
1.76
1.44
197.37
2.52
3.03
1.22
5.89
227.38
0.76
2.3?
1.90
221.15
3.34
4.02
1.61
7.76
239.56
0.85
2.61
2.12
233.61
3.74
4.50
1.81
8.72
232.76
0.57
1.70
1.39
212.09
2.46
2.97
1.19
5.75
147.53
0.23
0.71
0.57
134.22
1.02
1.22
0.48
2.35
135.35
0.17
0.54
0.42
117.80
0.76
0.93
0.37
1.78
113.27
0.25
0.74
0.59
108.74
1.05
1.27
0.51
2.44
119.50
0.25
0.74
0.59
110.44
1.08
1.30
0.51
2.t9
124.88
0.17
0.51
0.42
108.74
0.74
0.91
0.37
1.76
123.46
0.20
0.59
0.48
107.04
0.88
1.05
0.42
2.04
129.97
0.25
0.76
0.62
123.18
1.10
1.33
0.54
2.56
138.75
0.34
1.05
0.85
134.22
1.53
1.81
0.74
3.54
161.48
0.38
1.16
0.95
150.25
1.68
2.02
0.81
3.90
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA OF LAKE =
SUM OF SUB-DRAINAGE AREAS
12302.5
12247.1
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND OAILY FLOWS
TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAR MEAN FLOW DAY
4510A1
FLOW DAY
451001
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
365.287
396.436
450.238
220.588
328.475
155.176
132.806
143.850
83.818
84.951
150.079
252.020
311.485
1.048
0.566
2.2C9
0.113
0.906
C.283
0.283
0.283
0.255
0.113
0.283
0.736
0.991
25
18
23
20
17
15
16
14
14
18
15
5
2
25
18
23
20
17
15
16
14
14
18
15
5
2
38.228
447.406
18.689
9.911
322.812
119.214
110.436
230.499
32.281
50.970
214.925
382.277
269.010
0.623
1.642
0.2?7
0.170
0.821
0.113
0.035
1.841
0.113
0.085
0.198
0.453
0.906
19
19
SUMMARY
TOTAL FLOW IN
TOTAL FLOW OUT
FLOW DAY
FLOW
175.564
0.2H3
1940.06
1943.38
-------
TRIBUTARY FLOW INFORMATION FOR SOUTH CAROLINA
04/27/76
LAKE CODE 4510
WATEHEE LAKE
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS(CMS)
TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAR
MEAN FLOW DAY
FLOW DAY
FLOW DAY
FLOW
4510C1
4510D1
4510E1
4510F1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
i
2
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
3.228
1.841
6.683
0.368
2.775
0.396
0.311
1.133
0.793
0.340
0.821
2.237
3.0P2
2.633
1.557
5.380
0.311
2.265
0.368
0.311
0.850
0.623
0.283
0.680
1.812
2.464
334.139
373.782
393.604
229.650
294.495
160.840
144.416
138.753
73.057
84.101
140.452
227.667
294.495
4.644
2.832
9.628
0.538
4.021
0.453
0.340
1.699
1.133
0.481
1.218
3.200
4.332
25
18
23
20
17
15
16
14
14
18
15
5
2
25
18
23
20
17
15
16
14
14
18
15
5
2
25
18
23
20
17
15
16
14
14
18
IS
5
2
25
18
23
20
17
15
16
14
14
18
15
b
2
1.897
4.955
0.680
0.566
2.492
0.340
0.227
5.550
0.340
0.283
0.566
1.386
2.775
1.557
4.106
0.538
0.453
2.039
0.283
0.170
4.531
0.283
0.227
0.453
1.133
2.265
20.530
705.089
67.960
23.078
282.319
170.467
89.481
197.085
11.044
65.978
228.234
225.402
260.232
2.718
7.221
0.963
0.793
3.625
0.481
U.311
8.042
0.481
0.396
0.793
1.982
4.021
19
0.821
19
0.680
19
185.192
19
1.218
-------
TRIBUTARY FLOW INFORMATION FOR SOUTH CAROLINA
04/27/76
LAKE CODE 4510
WATEREE LAKE
MEAN MONTHLY FLOiilS AND DAILY FLOWS (CMS)
TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAR MEAN FLOW DAY
4510G1
4S10H1
4510ZZ
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
74
74
5.607
3.256
11.327
0.651
4.814
0.481
0.340
1.982
1.359
0.566
1.444
3.851
5.210
2.237
1.274
4.616
0.255
1.926
0.368
0.283
0.850
0.538
0.227
0.566
1.557
2.095
10.817
6.513
22.370
1.246
9.345
0.368
0.396
3.681
2.605
1.133
2.803
7.476
10.081
25
18
23
20
17
15
16
14
14
18
15
5
2
25
18
23
20
17
15
16
14
14
18
15
5
2
25
18
23
20
17
15
16
14
14
18
15
5
2
FLOW DAY
FLOW DAY
FLOW
3.256
8.693
1.161
0.963
4.332
0.566
0.396
9.628
0.566
0.481
0.991
2.407
4.814
303
3.483
0.453
396
727
,227
142
,823
227
,198
425
1
0.963
1.926
6.230
16.707
2.237
1.869
8.410
1.133
0.736
18.689
1.133
0.934
1.841
4.672
9.345
19
1.444
19
0.566
19
2.832
-------
APPENDIX D
PHYSICAL and CHEMICAL DATA
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/04/37
451001
34 20 20.0 080 42 03.0 3
LAKE WATEREE
45055 SOUTH CAROLINA
030892
DATE
FROM
TO
73/03/30
73/07/06
73/09/21
TIME
OF
DAY
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
00
00
00
00
00
00
15
DEPTH
FEET
0000
0006
0015
0027
0040
0050
0060
0000
0006
OOlb
0030
0048
0064
0000
15 0015
15
15
15
0030
0045
0060
00010
MATER
TEMP
CENT
15.1
14.5
14.5
14.4
14.4
14.3
14.2
30.8
30.5
27.2
25.7
25.0
23.5
27. «
27.1
27.1
26.9
26.7
00300
DO
M6/L
8.2
8.6
8.2
8.4
8.0
7.6
9.5
3.6
2.5
1.3
0.9
5.8
4.4
3.8
1.8
2.2
00077 00094
TRANSP CNDUCTVY
SECCHI FIELD
INCHES M1CROMHO
18 98
100
90
90
90
95
100
36 98
85
92
90
89
89
37 113
111
111
109
108
11EPALES 2111202
0064 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00400 00410 00610 00625
PH T ALK NH3-N TOT KJEL
SU
7.20
7.2C
7.20
7.20
7.10
7.10
7.00
. 9.2C
8.50
6.7C
6.60
6.50
6.60
6.70
6.6C
6.70
6.60
6.60
CAC03
MG/L
17
16
16
16
15
15
15
19
15
18
16
17
20
19
19
18
18
17
TOTAL
MG/L
0.180
0.160
0.160
0.170
0.170
0.180
0.190
0.090
0.070
0.090
0.280
0.420
0.480
0.150
0.140
0.1SO
0.250
0.250
N
MG/L
0.700
0.300
0.400
0.400
0.400
0.500
0.600
0.800
0.500
0.500
0.400
0.600
0.800
1.000
0.600
0.600
0.700
0.800
00630
N02&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.380
0.380
0.370
0.380
0.380
0.380
0.380
U.070
0.070
0.150
0.290
0.240
0.220
0.130
0.120
0.120
0.190
0.180
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.042
0.039
0.039
0.042
0.037
0.036
0.034
0.008
0.010
0.017
0.036
0.032
0.032
0.018
0.018
0.021
0.027
0.028
00665 32217
DATE TIME DEPTH PHOS-TOT CHLRPHYL
FROM OF A
TO DAY FEET MG/L P UG/L
73/03/30 12 50
12 50
12 50
12 50
12 50
12 50
12 50
73/07/06 14 00
14 00
14 00
14 00
14 00
14 00
73/09/21 14 15
14 15
14 15
14 15
14 15
0000
0006
0015
0027
0040
0050
0060
0000
0006
0015
0030
0048
0064
0000
0015
0030
0045
0060
0.098
0.096
0.092
0.101
0.109
0.103
0.103
0.067
0.056
0.045
0.083
0.111
0.125
0.039
0.037
0.032
0.047
0.051
3.9
8.8
12.4
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 76/04/27
451002
34 22 30.0 080 46 15.0 3
LAKE MATEREE
45055 SOUTH CAROLINA
030891
DATE
FROM
TO
73/03/30
73/07/06
73/09/21
DATE
FROM
TO
73/03/30
73/07/06
73/09/21
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
13 35 0000
13 35 0006
13 35 0015
13 35 0025
14 35 0000
14 35 0006
14 35 0015
14 35 0030
16 05 0000
16 05 0015
16 05 0026
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
13 35 0000
13 35 0006
13 35 0015
13 35 0025
14 35 0000
14 35 0006
14 35 0015
14 35 0030
16 05 0000
16 OS 0015
16 05 0026
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
14.6
14.5
14.5
14.5
30.9
29.5
27.5
25.2
27.4
26.0
26.4
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.121
0.110
0.122
0.112
0.071
0.061
0.113
0.058
0.043
0.038
0.045
00300
DO
MG/L
8.6
8.4
8.4
7.8
3.8
1.3
9.2
5.0
4.2
32217
CHLRPHYL
A
OG/L
6.2
10.4
10.9
00077 00094
TRANSP CNDUCTVY
SECCHI FIELD
INCHES MICROMHO
15 90
90
90
90
36 100
98
100
91
36 111
108
108
11EPALES 2111202
0034 FEET , DEPTH CLASS 00
00400 00410 00610 00625
PH
SU
7.20
7.20
7.20
7.20
9.10
7.70
6.60
7.00
9.00
7.50
7.00
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
33
17
16
17
21
21
24
19
17
18
21
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.170
0.160
0.160
0.160
0.090
0.060
0.310
0.140
0.070
0.140
0.170
TOT
N
KJEL
MG/L
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
.800
.400
.400
.400
.500
.400
.600
.500
.600
.700
.600
00630
N02S.N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.470
0.390
0.390
0.390
0.080
0.080
0.260
0.160
0.040
0.130
0.130
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.043
0.041
0.040
0.039
0.007
0.009
0.030
0.018
0.015
0.026
0.026
-------
STCWET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/04/27
451003
34 25 25.0 080 50 30.0 3
LAKE «IATE«EE
45039 SOUTH CAROLINA
030891
11EPALES 2111202
0022 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
DATE
FROM
TO
73/03/31
73/07/06
73/09/21
DATE
FROM
TO
73/03/31
73/07/06
73/09/21
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
10 45 0000
10 45 0006
10 45 0012
10 45 0018
15 00 0000
15 00 0006
15 00 0015
15 00 0020
16 35 0000
16 35 0010
16 35 0013
16 35 0020
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
10 45 0000
10 45 0006
10 45 0012
10 45 ooia
15 00 0000
15 00 0006
15 00 0015
15 00 0020
16 35 0000
16 35 0010
16 35 0020
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
14.7
14.1
14.1
14.1
30.2
28.4
27.9
27.0
27.4
26.0
25.9
25.8
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.111
0.124
0.119
0.127
0.088
0.088
0.077
0.094
0.144
0.066
0.075
00300
DO
MG/L
8.
8.
8.
8.
5.
3.
8.
5.
5.
32217
00077 00094
TRANSP CNOUCTVY
SECCHI FIELD
INCHES MICROMHO
8
0
0
5
5
6
8
4
2
12 90
90
90
90
30 110
102
108
105
30 104
101
100
100
00400 00410
PH T ALK
CAC03
su
7.20
7.30
7.30
7.30
8.10
7.70
6.90
6.80
7.30
6.90
6.90
MG/L
10K
17
16
35
24
20
23
25
21
22
23
00610 00625 00630 00671
NH3-N TOT KJEL N02&N03 PHOS-DIS
TOTAL N N-TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L
0.160
0.160
0.170
0.190
0.070
0.080
0.170
0.170
0.060
0.120
0.170
MG/L
0.600
0.300
0.500
0.400
0.300
0.200
0.300
0.500
1.100
0.700
0.700
MG/L
0.360
0.390
0.400
0.480
0.160
0.160
0.280
0.210
0.190
0.180
0.220
MG/L P
0.038
0.038
0.042
0.041
0.025
0.028
0.034
0.021
0.032
0.034
0.038
CHLRPHYL
A
UG/L
2.
6.
16.
6
5
5
K VALUE KNOWN TO tiE
LKSS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 76/04/27
451004
34 31 35.0 080 52 00.0 3
LAKE WATEREE
45039 SOUTH CAROLINA
030891
DATE
FROM
TO
73/03/30
73/07/06
73/09/21
DATE
FROM
TO
73/03/30
73/07/06
73/09/21
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
11 20 0000
11 20 0006
15 30 0000
15 30 0005
15 30 0009
10 00 0000
10 00 0010
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
11 ?0 0000
11 20 0006
15 30 0000
15 30 0005
15 30 0009
10 00 0000
10 00 0010
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
13o4
13o4
28.4
28.4
28.4
26.3
26.0
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.126
0.128
Ooll7
0.113
0*099
0»076
0.069
00300
DO
MG/L
a.
6.
6.
7.
6.
32217
00077 00094
TRANSP CNDUCTVY
SECCHI FIELD
INCHES MICROMHO
0
1
2
2
0
12 90
90
12 110
110
110
18 100
100
11EPALES 2111202
0010 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00400 00410 00610 00625 00630 00671
PH T ALK NH3-N TOT KJEL N028.N03 PHOS-OIS
CAC03 TOTAL N N-TOTAL ORTHO
SU
7o30
7.20
6o90
6.90
6.90
6.80
6.70
MG/L MG/L
10K 0,150
10K 0.160
23 Ool60
24 0.150
23 0.130
20 0.140
21 0.130
MG/L
0.500
0.300
0.500
0.200
0.200
0.900
0.600
MG/L
0.370
Oo380
0.310
0.330
0.310
0.230
0.220
MG/L P
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0042
.042
o047
o044
c041
o052
o047
CHLRPHYL
A
UG/L
2.
10.
9.
3
6
8
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
APPENDIX E
TRIBUTARY and WASTEWATER
TREATMENT PLANT DATA
-------
STORE! (RETRIEVAL DATE 76/04/27
4510A1
34 20 00.0 080 42 00.0 4
WATEREE RIVER
45 KERSHAW CO HWY M
0/WATEP.EE LAKE 030892
BANK .25 BELO 0AM AT END OF RD
11EPALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
DATE
FROM
TO
73/02/25
73/03/18
73/04/23
73/05/20
73/06/17
73/07/15
73/08/16
73/09/14
73/10/14
73/11/18
73/12/15
74/01/05
7<»/01/19
74/02/02
00630 00625
TIME DEPTH N02S.N03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TOTAL N
DAY FEET MG/L MG/L
08
08
14
09
09
18
11
08
16
09
08
09
10
09
5?
10
45
45
20
50
30
47
00
00
49
05
15
25
0
0
0
0
0
0
C
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.290
.273
.260
.210
.210
.200
.075
.031
.138
.168
.352
.370
.370
.440
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
440
480
630
560
980
200
610
820
450
•+50
400
800
400
900
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PHOS-DIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L MG/L P MG/L P
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
9.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
154
063
110
220
120
277
095
150
170
076
116
176
116
108
0.060
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
042
052
046
035
053
Oil
005K
021
016
040
080
060
060
0.125
0.100
0.110
0.080
0.085
0.105
0.060
0.055
0.067
0.055
0.080
0.12C
0.130
0.115
K VALUE KNOWN Tu BE
THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/04/27
451081
34 23 30oO 080 44 OOoO 4
WHITE OAK CREEK
45 KERSHAW CO HtelV M
T/WATEREE LAKE 030892
ST HWV 97 BRDG 10 MI NtJ OF CAMDEN
11EPALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
DATE
FROM
TO
73/02/25
73/03/18
73/04/23
73/05/20
73/06/17
73/07/15
73/08/16
73/09/14
73/10/14
73/11/18
73/12/15
74/01/05
74/01/19
7<»/02/02
@®630 00625
TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TOTAL N
DAY FEET
12 30
10 30
17 15
11 00
11 51
11 38
14 45
11 40
14 00
11 32
11 35
10 52
12 50
12 25
MG/L
0.075
0.046
0.042
0.140
0.100
0,132
0.132
0.091
0.078
00017
0.068
0.096
Ool24
0.120
MG/L
0.100K
0.200
0.190
0«560
Oo400
0.190
Oo210
0.330
10450
OelOOK
0.100K
Oo200
OolOO
OolOOK
00610 00671 00665
NH3°N PHOS-DIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L
0.037
0.012
0.005K
0.038
0.042
0.028
0°018
0.032
Oo042
OoOH
0.028
0®028
0.028
0.020
MG/L P
0.010
0.012
0.006
0.012
0.008
0.017
0.007
0.010
0.009
Ooooe
Oo012
0.016
Oo008
Oo015
MG/L P
0.020
0.025
0.020
Oo027
0.038
0.030
Oo020
0.035
0.025
0.020
0.020
0.030
0.030
0.030
K VALUE KNOWN TO 8E
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/04/27
4510C1
34 27 30.0 080 46 00.0 4
bEAVER CREEK
45 KERSHAW CO HWY M
T/WATEREE RIVER 030891
ST HHY 13 6ROG 18 MI NW OF CAMDEN
11EPALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
DATE
FROM
TO
73/02/25
73/03/18
73/04/23
73/05/20
73/06/17
73/07/15
73/08/16
73/09/14
73/10/14
73/11/18
73/12/15
74/01/05
7^/01/19
74/02/02
00630 00625
TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TOTAL N
DAY FEET
12
10
17
10
11
11
14
11
14
n
H
10
12
12
00
00
00
05
35
20
20
?2
16
14
15
40
25
00
MG/L
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.080
.046
.038
.120
.086
.018
.138
.078
.013
.012
c056
.032
.OlOK
.100
MG/L
0.
1.
0.
0.
1.
0.
Oc
Oe
0.
Oo
0.
0.
0.
0.
120
100
180
280
500
170
100K
400
300
100K
300
400
100
600
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PHOS-DIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
Oo
Oo
Oo
Oe
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
050
044
007
042
046
033
016
037
032
020
028
032
016
055
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
p
008
009
006
Oil
019
010
005K
010
005K
008
008
016
005K
015
MG/L P
0.015
0.025
0.020
0.025
0.035
0.015
03015
0.050
0.025
0.010
0.025
0.045
0.020
0.040
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICTED
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 76/04/27
451001
34 32 25.0 080 52 00.0 4
CEDAR CREEK
45 LANCASTER CO HWY
T/WATEREE LAKE 030891
BANK ABOV BOAT RAMPtBELO CONFLUENCE
11EPALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
DATE
FROM
TO
73/02/25
73/03/18
73/04/23
73/05/20
73/06/17
73/07/15
73/08/16
73/09/14
73/10/14
73/11/18
73/12/15
74/01/05
74/01/19
74/02/02
00630 00625
TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TOTAL N
DAY FEET MG/L MG/L
11
09
16
09
11
11
13
10
14
10
10
10
12
11
20
40
35
40
07
00
40
53
37
39
31
10
05
25
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.069
.046
.093
.120
.092
.280
.160
.072
.058
.016
.340
.336
.080
.080
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
•
•
*
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
100K
050
295
480
150
640
170
800
350
100K
550
600
100K
400
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PHOS-DIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L MG/L P MG/L P
0.
0.
0.
058
049
023
0.018
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
3.
025
115
033
121
029
016
136
132
030
080
0.009
0.013
0.020
0.012
0.020
0.054
0.020
0.017
0.009
0.008
0.088
0.080
0.008
0.020
0.015
0.035
0.060
0.075
0.050
0.115
0.040
0.080
0.025
0.030
0.178
0.190
0.035
0.110
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LtSS TH*N INDICATED
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 76/04/27
4510E1
34 32 30.0 080 52 30.0 4
CATAWBA RIVER
45 LANCASTER CO HWY
I/WATEREE LAKE 030891
BANK BELO ROCK&CEDAR CREEKS POWER PLANTS
11EPALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
DATE
FROM
ro
73/02/25
73/03/18
73/04/23
73/05/20
73/06/17
73/07/15
73/08/16
73/09/14
73/10/14
73/11/18
73/12/15
74/01/05
7<»/01/19
74/02/02
00630 00625
TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TOTAL N
DAY FEET
11
09
16
09
11
10
13
10
14
10
10
10
12
11
15
30
40
38
00
55
55
48
33
37
40
15
00
25
MG/L
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.300
.050
.044
.270
.330
.100
.315
.198
.240
.380
.068
.340
.470
.440
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
480
580
190
960
600
100K
540
560
400
700
100
600
600
600
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PHOS-OIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
132
024
015
096
126
019
105
105
095
124
024
136
140
145
MG/L P
0.069
0.034
0.009
0.050
0.064
0.021
0.072
0.060
0.061
0.104
0.012
0.084
0.080
0.065
MG/L P
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.150
.155
.025
.105
.165
.021
.155
.145
.120
.185
.035
.190
.185
.155
K VALUE KNOH/N TO bE
LESS TH«N INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/04/27
4510F1
34 28 00.0 080 56
bIG WATEREE CREEK
45 FAIRFIELO CO HtoY
T/*ATEREE LAKE
US HMY 21 BROG
11EPALES
30.0 4
030891
13 MI ENE OF WINNS80RO
2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
DATE
FROM
TO
73/02/25
73/03/18
73/04/23
73/05/20
73/06/17
73/07/15
73/08/16
73/09/14
73/10/14
73/11/18
73/12/15
74/01/05
74/01/19
74/02/02
00630 00625
TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TOTAL N
DAY FEET
10
07
16
09
10
10
12
10
15
09
10
09
11
10
25
40
10
50
28
11
50
07
15
49
05
55
15
50
MG/L
0.054
0.078
0.012
0.130
0.056
0.023
0.066
0.066
0.025
0.012
0.032
0.048
0.064
0.080
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
160
560
190
260
960
270
205
050
100K
100K
400
400
300
300
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PHOS-DIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.054
.019
.008
.014
.050
,027
.031
.092
.028
.020
.020
.032
.032
.030
MG/L
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
P
022
020
010
012
066
009
013
0.052
0
0
0
0
0
0
•
•
•
•
•
•
036
020
036
040
020
040
MG/L P
0.040
0.120
0.025
0.075
0.145
0.025
0.025
0.300
0.036
0.022
0.095
0.105
0.050
0.120
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 76/04/27
4510G1
34 26 00.0 080 56 30.0 4
LITTLE WATEREE CREEK
45 FA1RFIELD CO HWY
T/WATEREE LAKE 030891
US HWY 21 BROG 12 ENE OF WINNSBORO
11EPALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
DATE
FROM
TO
73/02/25
73/03/18
73/04/23
73/05/20
73/Ob/17
73/07/15
73/08/16
73/09/14
73/10/14
73/11/18
73/12/15
74/01/05
74/01/19
74/02/02
00630 00625
TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TOTAL N
DAY FEET
10
07
15
09
10
10
12
10
15
09
10
09
11
10
10
35
55
10
20
03
45
02
20
45
00
45
10
45
MG/L
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.147
.020
.126
.350
.066
.200
.189
.067
.105
.012
.088
.068
.160
.104
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
160
330
180
230
700
850
200
850
150
200
500
250
700
500
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PHOS-DIS PhOS-TOT
TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
060
009
005K
026
os»o
044
020
154
042
016
020
032
044
035
MG/L P
0.013
0.013
0.005K
0.009
0.066
0.008
0.005K
0.027
0.005K
O.OOSK
0.012
0.024
0.008
0.020
MG/L P
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.020
.040
.015
.020
.098
.015
.010
.100
.015
.005K
.045
.052
.025
.045
K VALUE KNOrtN TO b£
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/04/27
4510H1
34 23 00.0 030 55 30.0 4
UUTCHMANS CREEK
45 FAIrtFIELD CO HWY
T/WATEREE LAKE 030891
UNIMPROVED RO FORD 6 MI N OF RIDGEWAY
11EPALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
DATE
FROM
TO
73/02/25
73/03/18
73/04/23
73/05/20
73/06/17
73/07/15
73/08/16
73/09/14
73/10/14
73/11/18
73/12/15
74/01/19
74/02/02
00630
TIME DEPTH N02&N03
OF N-TOTAL
DAY FEET
09
07
15
08
11
09
12
09
15
09
09
10
10
45
15
30
00
00
36
15
40
37
30
40
47
15
MG/L
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
•
•
•
•
•
*
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
032
252
010K
069
040
054
056
019
015
010K
007
032
084
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.120
0.155
0.180
0.190
1.400
0.340
0.120
0.820
0.600
• 0.100K
0.500
0.200
0.200
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PHOS-DIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.032
.056
.005K
.014
.058
.105
.019
.099
.046
.012
.024
.028
.025
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
P
010
005K
005K
0.035
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
009
005K
015
005K
008
014
008
025
MG/L P
0.015
0.050
0.015
0.015
0.050
0.025
0.015
0.050
0.025
0.008
0.045
0.030
0.040
K VALUE KNOWN TO HE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 76/04/27
4510X4 AH4510XA P001824
34 23 20.0 081 03 55.0 4
45 FAIkFIELD CO H»Y
T/LAKE WATEREE 030891
MCCULLY CREEK/LITTLE WATEREE CREEK
11EPALES 2141304
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
DATE
FROM
TO
73/06/12
CP-
73/06/12
73/07/12
CP-
73/07/12
73/08/15
CP(T>-
73/08/15
73/09/12
CP ( T > -
73/09/12
73/10/12
CP(T)-
73/10/12
73/11/12
73/12/12
CP(T>-
73/12/12
74/01/11
CPITJ-
74/01/11
74/02/12
CP(T)-
74/02/12
74/03/12
CP(T)-
74/03/12
74/04/12
CM(T)-
74/04/12
74/05/13
CP(T>-
74/05/13
74/06/07
00630
TIME DEPTH N02&N03
OF N-TOTAL
OAY FEET MG/L
11
16
11
16
10
15
11
16
11
16
10
10
15
10
15
10
15
10
15
11
16
10
15
13
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
1
0
0
1
1
2
0
0
0
0
1
4
3
.540
.037
.150
.540
.470
.200
.130
.120
.400
.040
.320
.300
.000
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
6.500
7.400
11.500
7.800
6.300
8.700
10.000
15.000
12.000
14.000
15.000
6.700
6.400
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.240
0.550
0.650
0.430
0.088
0.187
4.700
6.900
5.2HO
2.900
0.180
0.350
00671
PHOS-OIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
5.800
4.900
3.150
8.130
8.590
8.850
10.100
6.950
5.800
6.600
7.600
6.200
00665 50051 50053
PHOS-TOT FLOW CONDUIT
RATE FLOW-MOD
MG/L P INST MOD MONTHLY
7.350
5.800
8.000
8.700
9.400
9.800
10.100
7.900
6.400
d. 400
8.900
9.200
8.400
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
0.150
0.150
0.150
0.150
0.150
0.150
0.150
0.150
0.150
0.150
0.150
0.150
0.150
------- |