U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
WORKING PAPER SERIES
REPORT
ON
GRER'S FERRY RESERVOIR
VAN BUREN AND CLEBURNE COUNTIES
ARKANSAS
EPA REGION VI
WORKING PAPER No,
CORVALLIS ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY - CORVALLIS, OREGON
and
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING & SUPPORT LABORATORY - LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
•&G.P.O. 699-440
-------
REPORT
ON
GRER'S FERRY RESERVOIR
VAN BUREN AND CLEBURNE COUNTIES
ARKANSAS
EPA REGION VI
WORKING PAPER No,
WITH THE COOPERATION OF THE
ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF POLLUTION
CONTROL AND ECOLOGY
AND THE
ARKANSAS NATIONAL GUARD
JANUARY, 1977
-------
REPORT ON GREER'S FERRY RESERVOIR
VAN BUREN AND CLEBURNE COUNTIES, ARKANSAS
EPA REGION VI
by
National Eutrophication Survey
Water and Land Monitoring Branch
Monitoring Applications Laboratory
Environmental Monitoring & Support Laboratory
Las Vegas, Nevada
and
Special Studies Branch '
Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory
Corvallis, Oregon
Working Paper No. 487
OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
January 1977
-------
CONTENTS
Page
Foreword i i
List of Arkansas Study Lakes iv
Lake and Drainage Area Map v
Sections
I. Conclusions 1
II. Lake and Drainage Basin Characteristics 4
III. Lake Water Quality Summary 6
IV. Nutrient Loadings 12
V. Literature Reviewed 19
VI. Appendices 20
-------
FOREWORD
The National Eutrophicatlon Survey was Initiated 1n 1972 1n
response to an Administration commitment to Investigate the nation-
wide threat of accelerated eutrophlcatlon to freshwater lakes and
reservoirs.
OBJECTIVES
The Survey was designed to develop, in conjunction with state
environmental agencies, information on nutrient sources, concen-
trations, and impact on selected freshwater lakes as a basis for
formulating comprehensive and coordinated national, regional, and
state management practices relating to point source discharge
reduction and nonpolnt source pollution abatement in lake water-
sheds.
ANALYTIC APPROACH
The mathematical and statistical procedures selected for the
Survey's eutrophication analysis are based on related concepts
that:
a. A generalized representation or model relating
sources, concentrations, and impacts can be
constructed.
b. By applying measurements of relevant parameters
associated with lake degradation, the generalized
model can be transformed into an operational
representation of a lake, its drainage basin, and
related nutrients.
c. With such a transformation, an assessment of the
potential for eutrophication control can be made.
LAKE ANALYSIS
In this report, the first stage of evaluation of lake and
watershed data collected from the study lake and its drainage
basin is documented. The report is formatted to provide state
environmental agencies with specific information for basin
planning [§303(e)], water quality criteria/standards review
[§303(c)L clean lakes [§314(a,bj], and water quality monitoring
[§106 and §305(b)] activities mandated by the Federal Water
Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972.
-------
111
Beyond the single lake analysis, broader based correlations
between nutrient concentrations (and loading) and trophic condition
are being made to advance the rationale and data base for refine-
ment of nutrient water quality criteria for the Nation's freshwater
lakes. Likewise, multivariate evaluations for the relationships
between land use, nutrient export, and trophic condition, by lake
class or use, are being developed to assist in the formulation
of planning guidelines and policies by the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency and to augment plans implementation by the states.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The staff of the National Eutrophication Survey (Office of
Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency)
expresses sincere appreciation to the Arkansas Department of Pollution
Control and Ecology for professional involvement, to the Arkansas
National Guard for conducting the tributary sampling phase of the
Survey, and to those Arkansas wastewater treatment plant operators
who provided effluent samples and flow data.
The staff of the Water Division of the Arkansas Department
of Pollution Control and Ecology provided invaluable lake documentation
and counsel during the Survey, reviewed the preliminary reports
and provided critiques most useful in the preparation of this Working
Paper series.
Major General Thomas C. Armstrong, the Adjutant General of
Arkansas, and Project Officer Colonel Lavaun M. James, who directed
the volunteer efforts of the Arkansas National Guardsmen, are also
gratefully acknowledged for their assistance to the Survey.
-------
IV
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
STUDY LAKES
STATE OF ARKANSAS
LAKE NAME
Beaver
Blackfish
Blue Mountain
Bull Shoals
Catherine
Chi cot
DeGray
Erling
Grand
Greer's Ferry
Hami1 ton
Millwood
Nimrod
Norfork
Ouachita
Table Rock
COUNTY
Benton, Carroll, Washington
Crittenden, St. Francis
Logan, Yell
Baxter, Boone, Marion
(Taney, Ozark in MO)
Garland, Hot Spring
Chi cot
Clark, Hot Spring
Lafayette
Chicot
Van Buren, Cleburne
Garland
Hempstead, Howard,
Little River, Sevier
Perry, Yell
Baxter, Fulton (Ozark in MO)
Garland, Montgomery
Boone, Carroll (Barry,
Taney in MO)
-------
GREER'S FERRY RESERVOIR
® Tributary Sampling Site
X LJke Samcling Site
^ Sewage Treatment Facility
^7 Drainage Area Boundary
Scale
10 H1.
Arkansas
Map Location
-------
REPORT ON GREER'S FERRY RESERVOIR, ARKANSAS
STORE! NO. 0516
I. CONCLUSIONS
A. Trophic Condition:*
Based upon field observations and Survey data, Greer's
Ferry Reservoir is considered mesotrophic. Potential for
primary production as indicated by algal assay control yield
was low. Chlorophyll a^ values ranged from a low of 1.8 yg/1
in the spring to a high of 8.4 yg/1 in the summer with a mean
of 5.0 yg/1. The mean Secchi disc reading for the lake was
322 cm (127 inches). Of the 16 Arkansas lakes sampled in
1974, 15 had greater median total phosphorus values, 10 had
greater median inorganic nitrogen levels, and 13 had greater
median dissolved orthophosphorus levels than Greer's Ferry
Reservoir.
Survey limnologists reported no problem algal blooms or
macrophyte growths in the reservoir. However, Greer's Ferry
Reservoir does have localized problem areas of enrichment at-
tributable to both runoff from developed areas having inade-
quate treatment facilities, and agricultural runoff. The
Arkansas Department of Pollution Control and Ecology (1971)
has reported a number of locations on the lake where coliform
bacteria counts exceed State Health Department limits for
outdoor bathing areas.
*See Appendix E
-------
B. Rate-Limiting Nutrient:
Algal assay results indicate that Greer's Ferry Reservoir
is limited by available phosphorus. Spikes with phosphorus
alone or nitrogen and phosphorus simultaneously resulted in in-
creased assay yields. The addition of nitrogen alone did not
produce a growth response. The ratios of total available nitro-
gen to orthophosphorus (N/P) in the lake data suggest nitrogen
limitation in the spring and phosphorus limitation in the summer
and fall.
C. Nutrient Controllability:
1. Point sources -
The mean annual phosphorus load from point sources was
estimated to be 10.2% of the total load reaching Greer's
Ferry Reservoir. The city of Clinton wastewater treatment
plant contributed 8.3% of the total load.
The present phosphorus loading of 0.24 g/m2/yr for
Greer's Ferry Reservoir is less than that proposed by Vol-
lenweider (1975) as an oligotrophic loading (see Section IV-F)
Every effort should be made to reduce the known phosphorus
inputs to the greatest practicable extent in order to protect
the existing high quality of the lake.
-------
2. Nonpoint sources -
Nonpoint sources contributed 89.8% of the phosphorus
load reaching Greer's Ferry Reservoir. Measured tributaries
accounted for 52.2% of the total phosphorus load and the un-
gaged tributaries were estimated to contribute 30.2% of the
load.
Loading calculations based upon available nutrient con-
centrations yield a net export of nitrogen from the reservoir,
indicating that sampling was not adequate to depict actual
loading and/or export rates of that nutrient.
-------
II. LAKE AND DRAINAGE BASIN CHARACTERISTICS
Lake and drainage basin characteristics are itemized below.
Lake surface area and mean depth were provided by the Arkansas
Department of Pollution Control and Ecology. Lake maximum
depth was estimated from National Eutrophication Survey (NES)
data. Tributary flow data were provided by the Arkansas Dis-
trict Office of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). Outlet
drainage area includes the lake surface area. Mean hydraulic
retention time was obtained by dividing the lake volume by the
flow of the outlet. Precipitation values are estimated by me-
thods as outlined in NES Working Paper No. 175. A table of
metric/English conversions is included as Appendix A.
A. Lake Morphometry:
1. Surface area: 163.90km2.
2. Mean depth: 21.4 meters.
3. Maximum depth: 61.0 meters.
4. Volume: 3,507.922 x 106 m3.
5. Mean hydraulic retention time: 820 days (2.2 years).
-------
B. Tributary and Outlet:
(See Appendix B for flow data)_
1. Tributaries -
Draingage Mean flow
Name area (km2) (m3/sec)
A-2 Middle Fork Little 800.3 13.54
Red River
A-3 South Fork Little 375.5 6.32
Red River
D-l Archey Creek 305.6 4.99
E-l Pee Dee Creek 85.0 1.37
Minor tributaries and
immediate drainage - 1,255.9 23.44
Totals 2,822.3 49.66
2. Outlet - A-l Little
Red River 2,986.3 49.52
C. Precipitation:
1. Year of sampling: 152.2 cm.
2. Mean annual: 149.6 cm.
-------
Ill LAKE WATER QUALITY SUMMARY
Greer's Ferry Reservoir was sampled four times during the
open-water season of 1974 by means of a pontoon-equipped Huey
helicopter. Each time, samples for physical and chemical para-
meters were collected from four stations on the lake and from
a number of depths at each station (see map, page v). During
each visit, depth-integrated samples were collected from each
station for chlorophyll a^ analysis and phytoplankton identifica-
tion and enumeration. During the first and last visits, 18.9-
liter depth-integrated samples were composited for algal assays.
Maximum depths sampled were 59.4 meters at Station 01, 39.6 meters
at Station 02, 30.5 meters at Station 03 and 16.8 meters at Sta-
tion 04. For a more detailed explanation of NES methods, see
NES Working Paper No. 175.
The results obtained are presented in full in Appendix C
and are summarized in III-A for waters at the surface and at the
maximum depth for each site. Results of the phytoplankton counts
and chlorophyll ^determinations are included in III-B. Results
of the limiting nutrient study are presented in III-C.
-------
CREEP'S LAKE
STORE! CODE 0516
PARAMETER
TEMPERATURE (DEG CEuT)
O.-l.S V DEPTH
MAX DEPTH**
DISSOLVED OXYGEN
0.-1.5 M DEPTH
MAX DEPTH**
PH (STANDARD UNITS)
0.-1.5 M DEPTH
MAX DEPTH**
TOTAL ALKALINITY
O.-l.S M DEPTH
MAX DEPTH**
TOTAL P (MG/L)
O.-l.S M DEPTH
MAX DEPTH**
DISSOLVED ORTHO P (MG/L)
O.-l.S M DEPTH
MAX DEPTH**
N02+N03 (MG/L)
O.-l.S M DEPTH
MAX DEPTH**
AMMONIA (MG/L)
O.-l.S M DEPTH
MAX DEPTH**
KJELDAHL N (MG/L)
O.-l.S M DEPTH
MAX DEPTH**
SECCHI DISC (METERS)
PHYSICAL
CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS
N*
6
4
I
2
4
6
4
6
4
)
6
4
6
4
L)
6
4
6
4
6
4
b
4
1 3/27/74
5030 = tt
«ANGE MEDIAN
10.4- 1J.9
7.7- 9.9
. 10.4- 10.8
7.8- 9.4
24.- 35.
23.- 38.
6.5- 7.0
6.3- 6.4
10.- 15.
13.- 16.
0.010-0.019
0.013-0.038
0.013-0.014
0.014-0.015
0.090-0.130
0.090-0.160
0.030-0.040
0.030-0.080
0.200-0.200
0.200-0.300
11.4
7.8
10. b
9.4
33.
31 .
6.8
6.4
12.
15.
0.016
0.015
0.013
0.014
0.120
0.145
0.030
0.045
0.200
0.200
)
MAX
OEPfH
RANGE
(METERS)
0.0-
12.2-
1.5-
12.2-
0.0-
12.2-
0.0-
12.2-
0.0-
12.2-
0.0-
12.2-
0.0-
12.2-
0.0-
12.2-
0.0-
12.2-
0.0-
12.2-
1.5
57.9
1.5
57.9
1.5
57.9
1.5
57.9
1.5
57.9
l.b
57.9
1.5
57.9
1.5
57.9
1.5
57.9
1.5
57.9
N*
8
4
4
4
8
4
8
4
8
4
8
4
8
4
d
4
8
4
8
4
( 6/ ^/74
S»«« = 4
RANGE MEDIAN
24.0-
8.4-
8.0-
1.6-
32.-
31.-
6.7-
6.2-
13.-
13.-
0.008-0
0.007-0
0.002-0
0.002-0
0.030-0
0.180-0
0.020-0
0.020-0
0.200-0
0.200-0
24.7
13.8
8.6
6.4
46.
48.
7.5
6.6
23.
23.
.015
.025
.010
.010
.070
.290
.040
.060
.600
.200
24.1
9.3
8.4
5.5
44.
36.
7.3
6.4
19.
19.
0.012
0.020
0.002
0.002
0.055
0.230
0.030
0.040
0.250
0.200
)
MAX
DEPTH
RANGE
(METERS)
0.0-
16.8-
1.5-
16.8-
0.0-
16.8-
0.0-
16.8-
0.0-
16.8-
0.0-
16.8-
0.0-
16.8-
0.0-
16.d-
0.0-
16.8-
0.0-
16.8-
1.5
59.4
1.5
59.4
1.5
59.4
1.5
59.4
1.5
59.4
1.5
59.4
1.5
59.4
1.5
59.4
1.5
59.4
1.5
59.4
N*
5
4
5
4
5
4
S
4
5
4
5
4
5
4
5
4
5
4
5
4
( 9/ 3/74
S«*» = 4
RANGE MEDIAN
25.3- 26.0
9.4- 23.0
6.6- 7.6
0.4- 1.2
32.- 40.
29.- 56.
6.7- 6.9
6.5- 6.5
19.- 24.
21.- 43.
0.010-0.017
0.025-0.060
0.003-0.004
0.003-0.020
0.020-0.060
0.020-0.270
0.030-0.060
0.060-0.400
0.200-0.500
0.200-0.600
25.7
10.8
6. S
0.8
37.
51.
6.7
6.5
22.
33.
0.014
0.032
0.003
0.006
0.030
0.050
0.040
0.300
0.300
0.550
)
MAX
DEPTH
RANGE
(METERS)
0.0- 1.5
13.1- 45.7
0.0- 1.5
13.1- 45.7
0.0- 1.5
13.1- 45.7
0.0- 1.5
13.1- 45.7
0.0- 1.5
13.1- 45.7
0.0- 1.5
13.1- 45.7
0.0- 1.5
13.1- 45.7
0.0- 1.5
13.1- 45.7
0.0- 1.5
13.1- 45.7
0.0- 1.5
13.1- 45.7
1.8-
2.b
2.4- 3.4
2.9
1.8- 4.f>
4.1
» N = NO. OF SAMPLES
*« MAXIMUM DEPTH SAMPLED AT EACH SITE
*** S = NO. OK SITES SAMPLED ON THIS DATE
-------
GREEK'S LAKi
STO«ET CODE 0516
PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL CHARACTEHISTICS
( 10/16/74 )
PAPAMtTEP N* 3ANGE
TEMPERATURE IOEG
O.-l. 5 M DEPTH
MAX DEPTH**
DISSOLVED OXYGEN
O.-l. 5 M DEPTH
MAX DEPTH**
CONDUCTIVITY (UIH
O.-l. 5 M DEPTH
MAX DEPTH**
CENT)
H
4
(MG/L)
8
4
0<:>
y
4
19.6-
9.4-
7.6-
0.0-
46.-
46.-
21.7
19.3
8.2
7.0
55.
95.
MEDIAN
20. j
12.6
7.7
0.3
49.
56.
'••AX
QE^TH
0
15
0
15
0
15
.0-
.2-
.0-
.2-
.0-
.2-
1.
56.
1.
56.
1.
56,
5
4
5
4
5
4
PH (STANDARD JNITS)
O.-l. 5 M OEPTH
MAX DEPTH**
TOTAL ALKALINITY
O.-l .5 M OEPTH
MAX DEPTH**
TOTAL P (MG/L)
O.-l. 5 v OEPTH
MAX DEPTH**
DISSOLVED OrtTHO P
O.-l. 5 M DEPTH
MAX DEPTH**
N02+N03 (MG/L)
O.-l. 5 * DEPTH
MAX DEPTH**
AMMONIA (MG/L)
O.-l. 5 M DEPTH
MAX DEPTH**
KJELOAHL N (MG/L)
O.-l. 5 M DEPTH
MAX OEPTH**
8
4
(MG/L)
8
4
R
4
(MG/L)
ii
4
8
4
8
4
>}
4
6.8-
6.3-
15.-
18.-
0.008-0
0.016-0
0.002-0
0.003-0
0.020-0
0.020-0
0.020-0
0.060-0
0.200-0
0.200-1
7.5
6.7
IB.
40.
.020
.135
.004
.017
.0?0
.110
.060
.730
.500
.000
6.9
6.6
If.
26.
0.013
0.025
0.004
0.00^
0.020
0.050
0.030
0.170
O.?50
0.300
n
15
0
15
0
15
0
15
0
15
0
15
0
15
.0-
.2-
.0-
.2-
.0-
.2-
.0-
. 2-
.0-
.2-
.0-
.2-
.0-
.2-
1.
56.
1.
56.
1.
56.
1.
56.
1.
56.
1.
56.
1.
56.
5
4
5
4
5
4
5
4
5
4
5
4
5
4
SECCHl DISC (METERS)
1.5- 6.1
3.0
« N = NO. (Jf
*» MAXIMUM DEPTH SAMPLED AT EACH SITE
**« S = NO. OF SUES SAMPLED ON THIS DATE
-------
B. Biological Characteristics:
1. Phytoplankton -
Sampling
Date
03/27/74
06/06/74
09/03/74
10/16/74
Dominant
Genera
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Chroomonas
Melosira
Cryptomonas
Skeletonema
Flagellates
Other genera
Total
label laria
Melosira
Chroomonas
Cryptomonas
Fragi laria
Other genera
Total
Lyngbya
Chroomonas
Microcystis
Cryptomonas
Flagellates
Other genera
Total
Lyngbya
Tabel laria
Melosira
Dactyl ococcopsi
Centric diatom
Other genera
Algal
Units
per ml
500
500
350
325
225
573
2,473
1,579
486
202
202
121
326
2,916
3,098
313
219
188
125
469
4,412
678
601
290
s 58
39
136
Total 1,802
-------
2. Chlorophyll a_ -
10
Sampling
Date
03/27/74
06/06/74
09/03/74
10/16/74
Station
Number
01
02
03
04
01
02
03
04
01
02
03
04
01
02
03
04
Chlorophyll
(yg/D
2.2
1.8
2.6
2.6
2.5
5.2
5.3
8.4
2.0
1.9
3.3
5.2
2.9
3.0
4.8
6.5
C. Limiting Nutrient Study:
1. Autoclaved, filtered, and nutrient spiked
a. 03/27/74
Spike (mg/1)
Control
0.05 P
0.05 P + 1.0 N
1.00 N
Ortho P
Cone, (mg/lj
0.010
0.060
0.060
0.010
Inorganic N
Cone, (mg/1)
0.177
0.177
1.T77
1.177
Maximum Yield
(mg/1-dry wt.)
0.1
3.2
19.9
0.1
-------
11
b. 10/16/74
Ortho P Inorganic N Maximum Yield
Spike (mg/1) Cone, (mg/1) Cone, (mg/1) (mg/l-dry wt.)
Control 0.005 0.090 0.2
0.05 P 0.055 0.090 1.7
0.05 P + 1.0 N 0.055 1.090 20.1
1.00 N 0.005 1.090 0.3
2. Discussion -
The control yield of the assay alga, Selenastrum capri-
cornutum, indicates that the potential for primary producti-
vity was low in Greer's Ferry Reservoir during the spring and
fall sampling periods. The lake was phosphorus limited at
those times as indicated by the increased yield of the test
alga in response to an addition of orthophosphorus. Spikes
with nitrogen and phosphorus simultaneously resulted in maxi-
mum yield. Spikes with nitrogen alone did not produce a re-
sponse significantly beyond the control yield.
The mean N/P ratios were 26/1 in the summer and early fall,
and 24/1 in the late fall suggesting phosphorus limitation.
The spring ratio of 12/1 indicates nitrogen limitation at that
time (an N/P ratio of 14/1 or greater generally reflects
phosphorus limitation).
-------
12
IV. NUTRIENT LOADINGS
(See Appendix D for data)
For the determination of nutrient loadings, the Arkansas
National Guard collected monthly near-surface grab samples from
each of the tributary sites indicated on the map (page v), ex-
cept for the high runoff months of March and April when two sam-
ples were collected. Sampling was begun in June 1974, and was
completed in May 1975.
Through an interagency agreement, stream flow estimates for
the year of sampling and a "normalized" or average year were pro-
vided by the Arkansas District Office of the USGS for the tribu-
tary sites nearest the lake.
In this report, nutrient loads for sampled tributaries were
determined by using a modification of a USGS computer program for
calculating stream loadings. Nutrient loads indicated for tribu-
taries are those measured minus known point source loads, if any.
Nutrient loadings for unsampled "minor tributaries and imme-
diate drainage" ("II" of USGS) were estimated by using the mean
annual nutrient loads, in kg/km2/yr, at Stations D-l» Archey
Creek, and E-l, Pee Dee Creek, and multiplying the means by the
2
ZZ area in km .
The operators of the Clinton and Fairfield Bay wastewater
treatment plants provided monthly effluent samples and correspond-
ing flow data. Nutrient loads for the Eden Isle wastewater treat-
ment plant were estimated at 1.134 kg P and 3.401 kg N/Capita/yr.
-------
13
Monthly samples for Fairfield Bay were a composite of
three small plants, serving populations of 500, 350, and 100
persons, respectively. Wastes from the #3 plant are disposed
of by spray irrigation.
-------
14
A. Waste Sources:
1. Known municipal -
Name
Clinton**
Eden Isle
Fairfield Bay
(4 plants)
Population
Served*
1,029
275t
950
Treatment*
Trickling
Filter
Extended
Aeration
Trickling
Filter
Mean Flow
(n»3/d x IP3)
1.712
0.104***
0.253
Receiving
Hater
South Fork
Little Red River
Greer's Ferry
Reservoir
Greer's Ferry
Reservoir
2. Known industrial - **
*Treatment plant questionnaires. Eden Isle population and treatment
provided by the Eden Isle Corporation (personal communication).
**80% of the total waste load to the Clinton STP is contributed by poultry
processing. -
***Estimated at 0.3785 nr/capita/day.
tEstimated from 110 residences (215 persons per residence).
-------
15
B. Annual Total Phosphorus Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
% of
Source kg P/yr total
a. Tributaries (nonpoint load) -
A-2 Middle Fork Little 12,110 30.7
Red River
A-3 South Fork Little 4,770 12.1
Red River
D-l Archey Creek 2,825 7.2
E-l Pee Dee Creek 850 2.2
b. Minor tributaries and immediate
drainage (nonpoint load) - 11,930 30.2
c. Known municipal STP's -
Clinton 3,280 8.3
Eden Isle 310 0.8
Fairfield Bay 430 1.1
d. Septic tanks* - 25 0.1
e. Known industrial - (see **, page 14)
f. Direct precipitation** - 2.870 7.3
Total 39,400 100.0
2. Output - A-l Little Red River 20,525
3. Net annual P accumulation - 18,875
*Estimate based on 32 lakeside residences, 15 parks, and 1 resort.
**Estimated (see NES Working Paper No. 175).
-------
16
C. Annual Total Nitrogen Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
% of
Source kg N/yr total
a. Tributaries (nonpoint load) -
A-2 Middle Fork Little 233,405 25.2
Red River
A-3 South Fork Little 132,615 14.3
Red River
D-l Archey Creek 62,950 6.8
E-l Pee Dee Creek 20,225 2.2
b. Minor tributaries and immediate
drainage (nonpoint load) - 278,810 30.0
c. Known municipal STP's -
Clinton 19,385 2.1
Eden Isle 935 0.1
Fairfield Bay 965 0.1
d. Septic tanks* - 975 0.1
e. Known industrial - (see **, page 14)
f. Direct precipitation** - 176,945 19.1
Total 927,210 100.0
2. Output - A-l Little Red River 1,227,040
3. Net annual N export*** - 299,830
*Estimate based on 32 lakeside residences, 15 parks, and 1 resort,
**Estimated (see NES Working Paper No. 175).
***Export probably due to unknown sources and/or sampling error.
-------
17
Mean Annual Nonpoint Nutrient Export by Subdrainage Area:
Tributary kg P/km^/yr kg N/km^/yr
Middle Fork Little Red River
South Fork Little Red River
Archey Creek
Pee Dee Creek
15
13
9
10
292
353
206
238
Mean Nutrient Concentrations in Ungaged Streams:
Tributary
C-l Beech Creek
F-l Unnamed Stream
Mean Total P Mean Total N
(mg/1) (mg/1)
0.023
0.330
0.749
4.302
Nutrient concentrations for Beech Creek (C-l) are in line
with those found in the gaged tributaries to Greer's Ferry Reser-
voir. The extremely high nutrient concentrations for Unnamed
Stream can be attributed to the location of sampling site F-l,
9.1 meters below the Hidden Valley (Fairfield Bay) sewage treat-
ment plant outfall.
-------
18
F. Yearly Loadings:
In the following table, the existing phosphorus annual
loading is compared to the relationship proposed by Vollenweider
(1975). Essentially, his eutrophic loading is that at which
the receiving waters would become eutrophic or remain eutrophic;
his oligotrophic loading is that which would result in the
receiving water remaining oligotrophic or becoming oligotrophic
if morphometry permitted. A mesotrophic loading would be
considered one between eutrophic and oligotrophic.
Note that Vollenweider's model may not apply to lakes with
short hydraulic retention times or in which light penetration is
severely restricted by high concentrations of suspended solids
in the surface waters.
Total Yearly
Phosphorus Loading
(g/m2/yr)
Estimated loading for Greer's Ferry Reservoir 0.24
Vollenweider's eutrophic loading 0.60
Vollenweider's oligotrophic loading 0.30
-------
19
V. LITERATURE REVIEWED
Arkansas Department of Pollution Control and Ecology, Little
Rock, Arkansas. 1971. Pollution Control Survey of White
River Basin, August - October 1971.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1975. National Eutro-
phication Survey Methods 1973-1976. Working Paper No. 175.
National Environmental Research Center, Las Vegas, Nevada,
and Pacific Northwest Environmental Research Laboratory,
Corvallis, Oregon.
Vollenweider, R. A. 1975. Input-Output Models With Special
Reference to the Phosphorus Loading Concept in Limnology.
Schweiz. Z. Hydrol. 37:53-84.
-------
20
VI. APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
CONVERSION FACTORS
-------
CONVERSION FACTORS
Hectares x 2.471 = acres
Kilometers x 0.6214 = miles
Meters x 3.281 = feet
-4
Cubic meters x 8.107 x 10 = acre/feet
Square kilometers x 0.3861 - square miles
Cubic meters/sec x 35.315 = cubic feet/sec
Centimeters x 0.3937 = inches
Kilograms x 2.205 - pounds
Kilograms/square kilometer x 5.711 = Ibs/square mile
-------
APPENDIX B
TRIBUTARY FLOW DATA
-------
TRIBUTARY FLO* INFORMATION FOR ARKANSAS
LAKE CODE 0516 GREEKS FERRY RESERVOIR
TOTAL DRAINAGE AkEA OF LAKEEA (S3
2986.3
300.3
375.5
305.6
85.0
1419.6
JAN
FE3
MAR
APR
NORMALIZED FLOrfS(CMS)
MAY JUN JUL AUG
OCT
NOv
OtC
75.60
19.45
9.06
7.16
1.96
33.67
72.94
23.30
10.87
8.58
2.35
40.35
69.97
26.79
12.^9
9.85
2.70
46.38
62.67
24.72
11.52
9.09
2.55
42.79
46.07
22.00
10.25
8.10
2.22
38.09
45.79
8.72
4.08
3.23
0.88
15.12
43. 15
2.55
1.19
0.94
0.26
4.42
45.48
3.32
1.76
1.41
0.39
6.b3
35.57
2.30
1.08
0.85
0.23
3.99
16.91
5.10
2.36
1.88
0.52
8.83
36. 16
11.19
5.24
4.1J
1.13
19.40
45.48
13.22
6.17
4.M7
1.33
22.91
49.52
13.54
6.32
4.99
1.37
23.44
SUMMARY
TOTAL
SUM OF
DRAINAGE
AREA OF
LAKE =
SUB-DSAINAGE AREAS =
2986.3
2986.3
TOTAL FLOW
TOTAL FLOW
IN =
OUT =
598.46
595.98
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS(CMS)
TRIBUTARY MONTH t£AR MEAN FLOW DAY
0516A1
FLOW DAY
FLOW DAY
FLOW
0516A2
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
31.715
100.808
58.616
20.870
11.355
20.898
35.679
48.988
96.560
86.933
150.362
147.531
31.149
0.453
0.481
1.877
1.804
24.381
11.129
13.139
33.272
68.385
12.828
11.553
22
21
18
22
20
24
22
19
23
9
6
16
22
21
18
22
20
24
22
19
23
9
6
16
8.778
91.463
7.362
7.079
1.416
1.416
0.566
29.733
24.069
12.743 23
83.252 19
206.430
5.012
0.249
0.566
4.757
1.331
97.693
4.729
9.061
210.961
6.570 23
13.592 19
9.203
62.014
209.545
35.962
8.014
-------
FLUw INFORMATION FUK ARKANSAS
02/02/77
LAKE CODE C516
TRIbUTAKY
0516A3
0516D1
0516E1
GREEKS FERRr RESERVOIR
MQNT -I YEAR
OAILY FLOwS(CMS)
MEAN FLOW DAY
FLO* OAY
FLOW U-AY
FLO.V
l~
7
3
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
b
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
<*
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
7«
7*
7*
74
74
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
74
74
74
74
74
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
17.471
0.481
0.368
1.557
1.046
15.518
8.070
6.400
18.349
35.962
9.741
9.005
14.017
0.099
0.113
0.501
0.750
10.336
3.710
5.578
11.383
30.016
6.088
4.7CI
3.908
0.028
0.031
0.139
0.210
2.888
1.019
1.557
3.171
8.353
1.699
1.303
65.129
0.4&7
0.538
2.322
3.483
48.139
17.273
25.910
52.952
139.460
28.317
21.804
22
21
13
22
20
24
22
19
23
9
6
3
22
21
18
22
20
24
22
19
23
9
6
22
21
18
22
20
24
22
19
23
9
6
16
22
21
18
22
20
24
22
19
23
9
6
3
2.747
0.396
0.453
2.7-7
C.963
81.269
3.879
5.635
8b.0b3
4.361 23
6.371 19
19.340 16
1.218
0.1U5
0.311
1.699
0.566
38.228
2.2b5
3.653
53.349
2.265 23
5.182 19
0.340
0.085
• 0.085
0.198
0.085
11.327
2.265
0.991
14.H66
0.623 23
1.444 19
0.623
5.663
0.453
1.416
8.495
1.699
169.901
7.079
16.990
247.772
10.619 23
24.098 19
73.086 16
16.197
b.400
8.750
13.592
4.248
3.426
1.189
63.430
19.822
10.336
-------
APPENDIX C
PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL DATA
-------
STO^ET RETRIEVAL OATE 77/02/02
DATE
FROM
TO
74/03/27
74/06/06
74/09/03
74/10/16
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY
13
13
13
13
13
13
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
FEET
30
30
30
30
30
30
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
^5
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0000
0010
0030
0060
0120
0190
0000
0005
0015
0035
0050
0060
0030
0115
0130
0195
0000
0010
0025
0039
0075
01 10
0150
0000
0005
0035
0049
0070
0100
0130
0160
0185
00010
wATF-R
TEMP
CENT
10.7
10.6
10.5
9.1
7.9
7.7
24.0
24.0
23.7
19.3
13.7
12.6
11.3
8.8
6.5
6.4
25.9
25.8
25.8
21.9
13.7
10.9
9.4
20.0
20.0
20.0
19.7
14.6
11.9
10.1
9.6
9.<»
051601
35 28 36.0 092 05 33.0 3
li-^EEK'S LA £
05C23
100592
11EPALES
04001002
019b FEET OEPTh CLASS
00300
00
MG/L
10.6
10.4
10.0
10.0
9.4
8.6
8.2
7.6
7.2
7.6
8.2
7.0
6.4
6.4
7.6
7.4
7.8
2.8
4.8
5.2
1.2
7.8
7.6
7.8
6.4
3.4
3.8
C.4
0.6
0.2
OC077 00094
TRflNSP CNDUCTVY
SECCHI FIELD
INCHES MICROMHO
160 33
33
33
33
31
31
132 42
43
44
42
38
38
36
36
35
35
180 37
37
37
32
29
26
29
?4Q 46
46
46
46
44
40
45
51
55
OC400
PH
Su
7.00
6.90
6.70
6.60
6.50
6.40
7.4Q
7.20
7.00
6.60
6.55
6.55
6.50
6.30
6.20
6.60
6.95
7.00
7.00
6.80
6.70
6.60
6.50
7.55
7.40
7.30
7.10
6.80
6.75
6.60
6.60
6.60
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
10*
10K
10K
10K
10K
13
21
21
20
21
21
23
21
22
23
22
19
17
20
18
18
18
21
16
15
13
13
14
16
?2
20
31
00610
Nn3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.040
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.040
0.040
0.030
0.050
0.040
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.020
0.020
0.040
0.050
0.040
0.040
0.040
0.040
0.060
0.030
0.020K
0.020K
0.020K
0.020K
0.020K
0.060
0.170
0.240
00
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.200K
0.200K
0.200*
0.200K
0.200K
0.200K
0.600
0.200
0.200
0.200K
0.200K
0.200K
0.200K
0.200K
0.200
0.200K
0.500
0.400
0.400
0.300
0.400
0.400
0.200K
0.400
0.200K
0.200K
0.200K
0.200K
0.200K
0.300
0.400
0.400
00630
N02oNG3
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.090
0.080
0.090
0.120
0.140
0.150
0.070
0.030
0.020
0.050
0.130
0.160
0.1 6'J
0.180
0.200
0.200
0.030
0.020
0.020
0.020
0.140
0.200
0.270
0.020K
0.020K
0.020K
0.020K
0.120
0.180
0.160
0.100
0.080
00671
PhOS-uIS
OKTHO
MG/L P
0.014
0.015
0.015
0.014
0.014
0.014
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.009
0.009
0.011
0.009
0.009
0.010
0.010
0.003
0.003
0.002
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.004
0.003
0.002
0.002K
0.002K
0.002K
0.002K
0.005
0.003
0.003
K VALUE *NOW\ TO BE
LESS THAV I'\DIOTEO
-------
STDPET RETRIEVAL OATE 77/02/03
051601
35 3d 36.0 092 05 J3.0 3
05023
ARKANSAS
100592
/TYPA/AMQNT/LAKF
04001002
0195 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
OATE
FROM
TO
7W03/27
7^/06/06
74/09/03
7^/10/16
TIME DEPTri
OF
DAY FEET
13 30 0000
13 30 0010
13 30 0030
13 30 0060
13 30 0120
13 30 0190
09 55 0000
09 55 0005
09 55 0015
09 55 0035
09 55 0050
09 ** 0060
09 55 0060
09 55 011S
09 55 0130
09 55 0195
10 55 0000
10 55 0010
10 55 0025
10 55 0039
10 55 0075
10 55 0110
10 55 0150
10 00 0000
10 00 0005
10 00 0007
10 00 0020
10 00 0035
10 00 O0'«9
1C 00 0070
10 00 0100
10 00 0130
10 00 0160
10 00 0185
00865
PnOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.010
0.012
0.011
0.010
0.010
0.013
O.Olb
0.012
0.012
0.011
0.008
0.003
c.ooa
0.009
3.011
0.018
0.010
0.009
0.009
0.008
0.030
0.013
0.025
0.011
c.ooa
0.009
O.OOfi
0.006
0.007
0.016
0.016
0.016
32217 00031
ChlRPHYL INCDT LT
A REMNING
UG/L PERCENT
2.2
2.5
2.0
1.0
2.9
50.0
5.0
1.0
-------
STOrJET KETRIEVAL DATE 77/02/02
CSlo02
35 31 00.0 092 05 40.0 3
o^EE^'S \_t E
05023 ARKANSAS
100592
DATE
FRO'
TO
74/03/27
74/06/06
74/09/03
74/10/17
00010
TIME QEPTri rfATER
OF TEMP
DAY FEET CENT
14 15 0000
14 15 0010
14 15 0025
14 15 0050
U 15 0080
14 15 01 10
1
1
1
1
00 0000
00 0005
00 0030
00 0035
00 0050
00 006C
00 0112
45 0000
45 0010
45 0025
45 0037
45 0070
11 45 0110
11 45 0130
14 00 0000
14 00 0005
14 00 0032
14 00 0055
14 00 0066
14 CO 0080
14 00 0092
14 00 0105
10.4
10.1
10.0
9.4
8.1
7.7
24.1
24.1
23.4
19.0
14.5
10.9
8.7
25.3
25.3
25.3
24.0
14.0
11.1
9.5
20.3
20.2
20.1
19.9
15.9
14.1
12.9
11.7
llFPwLES 04001002
0116 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00300 00077 00094
00 TRANSP C-MDUCTVY
SECCHI FIELD
MG/L INCHES MICROMHO
120
10.6
10.6
10.6
10.0
9.4
144
8.4
8.0
70
• e
7.2
7.8
5.4
7.2 180
7.2
7.4
4fH
.0
4.4
3.0
0.6
8.0 132
82
.2
rt.4
7.6
2f
.6
2.6
2.8
0.4
32
32
32
34
31
31
44
44
A P
*T C.
43
39
37
37
37
37
38
37
29
26
48
55
50
50
50
47
48
51
57
00400 00410
Pri T ALK
CAC03
SU MG/L
6.75
6.70
6.90
6.90
6.50
6.40
7.50
7.30
7 . 1 0
6.60
6.40
6.40
6.20
6.70
6.80
6.90
6.75
6.70
6.60
6.50
7.00
7.05
6.95
6.90
6.40
6.30
6.30
6.35
13
17
21
19
17
14
22
23
14
15
16
16
16
19
19
19
19
48
19
35
16
16
16
17
16
15
15
21
00610 00625 00630 00671
NrtJ-N TOT KJEL N02&N03 PriOS-DIS
TOTAL N N-TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P
0.030
0.040
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.020K
0.040
0.040
0.020
0.040
O.ObO
0.040
0.040
0.040
0.040
0.050
0.320
0.040
0.030
0.020K
0.020
0.020K
0.020
0.030
0.100
0.200K
0.200
0.200
0.200
0.300
0.200
0.200
0.200
0.200
0.300
0.200
0.200
0.200
0.200
0.200
0.200
0.200
0.200
0.200K
0.600
0.500
0.200K
0.200K
0.200K
0.200K
0.200K
0.200K
0.200K
0.110
0.120
0.110
0.110
0.120
0.140
0.050
0.030
0.020
0.070
0.130
0.160
0.260
0.060
0.030
0.030
0.020
0.140
0.210
0.060
0.020
0.020K
0.020K
0.020K
0.120
0.150
0.180
0.110
0.013
0.016
0.015
0.015
0.013
0.015
0.002K
0.002
0.002K
0.002K
0.002K
0.002K
0.002K
0.003
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.002
0.009
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
TO 6E
'LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STQPET RETRIEVAL DATE 77/02/02
OS1602
35 31 00.0 092 05 40.0 3
05023
/TYPA/AM8NT/LiKC
DATE
FROM
TO
74/03/27
74/06/06
74/09/03
74/10/17
00665 32217 OC031
TIME DEPTH PnOS-TOT CrILRPHYL INCDT LT
OF A REMNING
DAY FEET
14
14
14
14
14
14
11
11
11
11
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
15
15
15
15
15
15
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0000
J010
0025
0050
0080
0110
0000
0005
0030
0035
0050
ooao
0112
0000
0010
002S
0037
0070
0110
0130
0000
0003
0005
0018
0032
0055
0066
0080
0092
0105
MG/L P
0
ft
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
.011
.0 !<•
.012
.011
.011
.015
.010
.012
.012
.009
.006
.004
.007
.010
.010
.008
.009
.008
.013
.033
.013
.012
.011
.011
.008
.008
.009
.016
UG/L PERCENT
1.8
5.2
1.9
1.0
3.0
50.0
5.0
l.C
100592
04001002
01 16 FEET DEHTn CLASS 00
-------
STlPEl *ETr
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL OATE 77/02/02
051603
35 35 40.0 092 10 45.0 3
05023 A*t\ANSAS
DATE
FROM
TO
74/03/27
74/06/06
74/09/03
74/10/17
TIME DE°Trt
OF
DAY
14
14
14
14
14
14
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
12
12
12
12
12
12
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
55
55
55
55
55
55
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
15
15
15
15
15
15
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
FEET
0000
0005
0015
0030
0060
0095
0000
0005
0020
0035
0055
0080
0100
0000
0010
0023
0040
0065
0090
0000
0004
0005
0015
0028
0050
0065
0077
0090
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.017
0.013
0.010
0.015
0.012
0.038
o.oca
0.012
0.012
0.012
0.008
C.017
0.025
0.017
C.020
0.014
0.011
0.018
0.060
0.014
0.014
0.012
0.016
0.079
0.016
0.135
32217 00031
CMLRPHYL INCOT LT
A REMNING
UG/L PERCENT
2.6
5.3
3.3
1.0
4.8
50.0
5.0
1.0
100592
04001002
0102 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
-------
STO*ET S£T?IEVAL J4TE 77/02/02
DATE
FROM
TO
74/03/27
74/06/06
74/09/03
74/10/17
TIME DEPTH ,
OF
DAY FEET
15
15
15
15
15
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
15
15
15
15
15
25
25
25
25
25
10
10
10
10
10
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
0000
0005
0015
0025
0040
0000
0005
0020
0040
0055
0000
0005
0018
0030
0043
0000
0005
0016
0033
0050
00010
TtiMP
CENT
13
11
10
10
9
24
24
24
17
13
25
25
25
25
23
20
19
19
19
19
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
9
8
6
3
9
1
1
0
5
8
7
7
6
6
0
4
a
6
5
3
00300
DO
MG/L
10.
10.
9.
9.
8.
7.
4.
5.
6.
6.
6.
6.
1.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
4
4
8
4
0
4
4
6
8
6
4
2
0
6
8
4
0
0
051604
35 31 50.0 092 21 "5.0 3
05141
100592
llt'^ALES
U4001002
0045 FEET DEPTf CLASS
00300
DO
MG/L
10.4
10. A
9.8
9.4
8.0
7. A
A. A
5.6
6.8
6.6
6.4
6.2
1.0
7.6
7.8
7.4
7.0
7.0
00077
TP.ANSP
SECCHI
INCHES
70
96
72
60
00094
CNDUCWY
FIELD
MICROMHO
25
24
24
23
23
32
33
34
29
31
32
32
33
33
54
47
47
46
46
46
00400
PH
su
6.60
6.55
6.50
6.50
6.40
6.70
6.90
6.70
6.25
6.60
6.70
6.70
6.70
6.70
6.50
6.85
6.90
6.80
6.80
6.70
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
11
15
17
17
16
13
13
12
12
13
22
22
22
22
31
16
15
14
18
18
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.040
0.060
0.030
0.030
0.040
0.030
0.060
0.030
0.050
0.040
0.040
0.280
0.060
0.040
0.040
0.060
0.060
00
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.200
0.200K
0.200K
0.200K
0.200K
0.500
0.300
0.300
0.200
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.200
0.500
0.400
0.200
0.200K
0.200
0.200K
00630
>N02v\03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.130
0.13u
0.110
0.120
0.090
0.060
0.060
0.060
0.110
0.180
0.020
0.020
0.020
0.020
0.020
0.020K
0.020K
0.020K
0.020
0.020K
00671
PhOS-UIb
OHTrtO
MG/L P
0.013
0.013
0.012
0.013
0.014
0.002
0.002K
0.002
0.002K
0.002K
0.004
0.003
0.002
0.002
0.003
0.00"
0.004
0.00"
0.008
0.005
K V^LUE KNOvN TO Bt
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STuSET RETRIEVAL UATt 77/02/02
051604
35 31 50.0 0^3 21 "5.0 3
'S LA"~
100592
/TYPA/A^3NT/LAKE
11EPALES 0*00100?
00*5 FEtT OEPTn CLASS 00
DATE
FROM
TO
74/03/27
7*/06/06
74/09/03
74/10/17
00665
TIME OEPTi PHOS-TOT
OF
DAY FEET
15 ?5
15 ?5
15 ?5
15 25
15 25
12 10
13 10
12 10
12 10
12 50
12 50
12 50
12 50
12 50
15 50
15 50
15 50
15 50
15 50
15 50
15 50
COOO
0005
0015
0025
0040
OOCO
0005
0020
0055
0000
0005
0018
0030
0043
0000
0002
0005
0009
0016
0033
0050
MG/L P
0.016
0.019
0.016
0.016
0.016
0.015
0.013
0.013
0.022
0.016
0.01*
C.015
0.01*
0.031
0.020
0.020
0.017
0.025
0.035
32217 00031
ChLRPHYL INCUT LT
A REMNING
UG/L PERCENT
2.6
8.*
5.2
1.0
6.5
50.0
5.0
1.0
-------
APPENDIX D
TRIBUTARY AND WASTEWATER
TREATMENT PLANT DATA
-------
_TKI=ViL
- 73/11/23
-Pi-
11630
O-"-1"!: TT4f -1-3-H f.j2eA~3
P*0M u= N-THTAL
TO DAY CCHT MG/L
74/06/22 17 05 0.148
74/07/21 12 08 0.152
74/08/18 11 15 0.140
74/09/22 12 30 0.160
7W10/20 15 00 0.160
74/11/24 14 35 0.336
74/12/22 11 00 0.088
75/Oi/ 19 14 00 0.072
75/02/23 14 45 0.080
75/03/09 16 00 0.084
75/03/23 15 10 0.192
75/04/06 13 20 0.280
75/04/19 17 04 0.105
75/05/16 10 56 0.125
35164!
35 30 SO.O 091 37 45.0
L ITTLE =E~ 3 tVf
05 CL5BUCN= CO '•'i.c
2.2
Sr
00625
T KJEL
N
MG/L
0.900
0.1COK
0.200
0. 100K
1. 100
0. 500
0.300
0.310
0.300
0.300
0. 100
1.350
0.550
2.000
OC61C
f-.'H3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.060
0.007
0.035
0.020
0.0-50
0.064
0.04C
0.040
0.040
0.014
0.008
0.01 =
0.020
0.055
J 06 7 1
PH: s-OI S
0CTHO
MG/L P
0.005K
0.005
0.015
0.005K
0.005K
0.020
0.105K
0.007
0.008K
0.008K
0.008
0.005K
0.005K
0.005K
11EPAL=S
4
00665
DHCS-TOT
MG/L P
0. 005K
0.015
0.015
0.005K
0.005
0.040
0.01 OK
0.010
0.020
0.035
0.010K
0.010K
0.010
0.010K
?F 3P55°
2111204
0000 FF=T
OEPTH
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN
INDICATED
-------
•IP t- L -\i VE
74/06/22
74/07/21
74/08/18
74/09/22
74/10/20
74/11/24
74/12/22
75/01/ 19
75/02/23
75/03/09
75/03/23
75/04/06
75/04/19
75/05/16
15
10
10
10
12
12
09
12
13
12
13
11
15
08
00
16
45
47
30
15
30
00
15
00
25
10
34
35
0516A2
35 33 50.0 .->92 14
LITTLE °_J &TV (y
05
BANK SiMFl.E 4.2 "I 'J E TP JCT WITH HWY 16
00630
2F.N03
Tr>T4L
MG/L
n.912
0.004
0.008
0.016
0.032
0.040
0.016
0.040
0.096
0.048
0.100
0.010
0.115
00625
'••JT KJcL
N
MG/L
0. 100K
0.425
1.300
C.200
0.400
0.400
C.200
0.150
0.200
0.700
0.700
C. 700
0.525
1.000
00610
NH3-N
Tr?TtL
MG/L
0.010
0.065
0.035
O.OIC
0.020
0.040
0.016
0.016
0.008
0.028
0.016
0.010
0.025
0.030
00671
PH2S-DIS
r;p THO
MG/L P
0.005
0.005
0.015
0.005K
0.005
0.010
0.007
0.015
0.008K
0.008K
0.016
0.005K
0.015
0.005
00665
PHOS-T3T
,MG/L P
O.J16
O.Otl
0.050
3.025
0.020
0.081-
0.310
0.035
0.010
0.040
0.040
0.020
0.020
0.010K
0000
DEPTH
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN
INDICATED
-------
»- i_ i t. V r :3
<- 75/11/73
S!,'-V~Y
051643
35 35 29.0 092 27 20.0
05 van S,i'-E'i c? Mi
T/G-ltc-S FFRPY C = $-:":VC!
3^03 3N U; "T 65 AT r
11E3ALHS 2111204
4 0000 F5?T DEPTH
r,c
*• =, OX
'<"•
74/06/22
74/07/21
74/08/18
74/09/22
74/10/20
74/11/24
74/12/22
75/01/19
75/02/23
75/03/09
75/03/23
75/04/0£
75/04/19
75/05/03
75/05/16
DiY f
II 25
09 05
08 55
03 40
10 15
10 20
03 15
10 30
10 30
10 15
12 05
10 20
14 00
13 33
03630
''!" 2C\ "3
M-TT 4L
MG/L
0.020
0.003
3.008
0.008
0.032
0.056
0.240
0.464
0.072
0.163
0.080
0.050
0.035
0. 790
0.015
00625
T'T KJ£l
N
MG/L
0. 100K
0.100
0. 500
0. 100K
0.200
0.600
0.100
o.4on
0.300
0.200
0. 800
0.925
0.550
0. 750
1.750
00610
\H3-Ki
TOTAL
XG/L
0.020
0.015
0.040
0.015
0.115
0.048
0.045
0.112
0.016
0.016
0.024
0.005K
0.050
0.010
0.035
3^671
PHH S-DI S
D^THO
MG/L P
0.005K
0.005
0.020
0.005K
0.010
0.005
0.005K
0.005K
0.008K
0.042
0.008
0.005K
0.010
0.005K
0.005K
00665
PHOS-TGT
MG/L P
0.010
O.J25
0.025
0.005*
0.010
0.090
0.01C-K
0.010
0.020
0.087
0.020
0.020
0.020
O.Q20
O.U20
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN
INDICATED
-------
Ni'L r-J'-
= <=a- LiS
75/11/23
D516A4
35 34 30.0 092 26 00.0
LITTLE 7"0 ? I Vr^
35 VA"; PU^E'i CD «i
1.25 V! 5 OF CLINTON
2111204
CT'Ce F? = T DEPTH
74/06/22
74/07/21
74/08/13
74/09/22
74/10/20
74/1 1/24
74/12/22
75/01/ IS
75/02/23
75/03/09
75/03/23
75/04/06
75/04/19
75/05/16
OiY f
12 40
08 40
08 45
08 20
10 10
10 '10
08 00
09 1"
10 00
10 00
11 45
10 00
13 16
18 04
0 56 3 0
' ' 2 C\'3 3
N-TO" AL
MG/L
0.004
0.004
0. 160
0.032
0.112
0.056
0.048
0.048
0.080
0.032
0.080
0.025
0.02"
0.015
00625
'"'T KJEL
N
MG/L
0.600
0.4CO
1. 100
0.200
0.600
0.4 CO
0.300
G.4CO
0.200
0.500
0.600
o.-»oo
0.300
1.200
00610
MH2-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.020
0.020
0.055
0.060
0.140
0.024
0.080
0.080
0.032
0.056
0.024
0.005
0.020
0.035
50671
PH." S-OI S
•TiTHC
MG/L P
0.005K
0.010
0.030
0.020
0.035
0 . o ? o
0.025
0.016
0.008
0.008
0.005K
0.005
0.005K
00665
PHGS-TOT
«G/L P
0.035
0.050
0.115
0.030
O.J90
0.070
0.020
0.025
0.020
0.060
0.020
0.010K
0.020
0.010K
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN
INDICATED
-------
75/ll/2fl
4- I IS
DA"
DAY F==T
74/06/22
74/07/21
74/08/13
74/09/22
74/10/20
74/1 1/24
74/12/22
75/01/19
75/02/23
75/03/09
75/03/23
75/04/06
75/04/ 19
75/05/16
16
11
11
11
14
13
U
13
14
15
14
12
16
09
10
10
00
40
10
45
31
00
00
00
20
30
27
47
3516C1
35 33 30.0 092 01 45. D
D£C;H CP--K
05 CLSPU^Nt CO liP
BANK SAMPL? 3.2 MI SE HF
llc'ALES 211120*
4 0000 FE =
00630
"2£M?3
•T3T1L
MG/L
0.016
0.004
0.084
0.016
0.024
0.112
0. 072
0.104
0.104
0.204
0.140
0.065
0.020
0.370
00625
TrT K.JEL
N
MG/L
0.800
1.300
0.600
0.200
0.300
0 . 400
0.400
0.500
0 . 300
0. 700
0.200
0.450
0.600
2.400
OOfclO
NH3-N'
TGT4L
MG/L
0.045
0.055
0.035
0.020
0.015
0.080
0.015
0.048
0.016
0.024
0.008
0.010
0.020
0.195
00671
DHTS-OIS
QB THC
MG/L P
0.005K
0.015
0.015
0.005K
0.005K
0.055
0.005
0.005K
0.008K
0.008K
0.008
0.005K
0.005
0.005K
00665
PHOS-TDT
MG/L P
o.no
0.025
0.025
O.Q05K
0.010
0.070
O.J1GK
0.010
0.010
0.030
0.010
0.010K
0.030
0.010K
DEPTH
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN
INDICATED
-------
STn-rT =ET?I=V4L
\JJTI_ cuTSC.'Mtr: >~!
75/11/23
0 ' T - T I M c
TO 04 Y
74/06/22
74/07/21
74/08/13
74/09/22
74/10/20
74/11/24
74/12/22
75/01/19
75/02/23
75/03/09
75/03/23
75/04/06
75/04/19
11 00
09 21
09 30
09 30
11 op
10 45
OS 30
10 40
11 00
10 40
12 15
10 30
14 12
D516D1
35 2S 20.0 092 27 40.0
35
VAN' ELME!\
BSDG JV HKY 65 1 HI N nc
iltPALFS 2111204
4 0000 F8=T
rP630
'02SV03
:-T 1T AL
MG/L
0.008
0.004
0.004
0.016
0 . 0 ? 4
0.048
0.024
0.032
0.072
0.028
0.056
0.280
0.015
00625
T;T KJEL
N
MG/L
0. 100
0.200
0.900
0.4CO
0.1 OOK
C.400
O.I 00
0.7CO
0.200
0.200
0.200
0.350
0.550
00610
NH3-N
T3T4L
MG/L
0.010
0.015
0.050
0.035
0.025
0.032
0.020
0.088
0.024
0.024
0.016
0.010
0.030
30671
BHns-0! S
T3THQ
MG/L P
0.005K
0.005K
0.015
0.005K
3.0Q5K
0.010
0.005K
0.005K
0.008K
0.008K
0.008K
0.005K
3.005
00665
0HC$-TOT
MG/L P
0.010
0.020
0.015
0.015
0.005
0.050
O.iMGK
0.010K
0.020
0.03G
0.010
0.020
0.030
DEPTH
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN
INDICATED
-------
S?T«I=tfAL 04*- 75/11/26
AT I?'i SUBVEY
74/06/22
74/07/2:
74/03/18
74/09/22
74/10/20
74/11/24
74/12/22
75/01/19
75/02/23
75/03/05
75/03/23
75/04/06
75/04/19
75/05/16
pay
13 50
09 30
09 50
09 40
11 15
11 00
03 45
11 00
12 00
11 00
12 25
10 40
14 20
19 15
00630
N-TOT
0.004
D.024
0.192
0.016
0.048
0.112
0.080
0.083
0.112
0.048
0.092
0.005
0.120
D516tl
35 35 20.0 092 24 55.0
R.Ec OEr C' -FK
05 VI '4 5U*t-\ C " 'ft°
00625
jT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.900
C.3CO
0.900
0.200
0.3CO
0.300
0.400
0.200
0.500
0.200
0.300
1.300
0.200
0.250
0061C
MM3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.040
0.010
0.065
0.030
0.020
0.04C
0.030
0.048
0.040
0.016
0.016
0.27C
0.010
0.022
00671
PHCS-DIS
T'RTHC
MG/L P
0.005K
0.010
0.010
0.005
0.005K
0.005
0.005K.
0.005K
0.008K
0.008K
0.008
0.005K
0.005K
0.005K
8P.D3
1 i t f* I
4
00665
PHOS-T3T
MG/L P
0.015
0.040
0.030
0.005
0.010
0.040
O.CHOK
0.010K
0.010
0.040
0.010
0.020
0.340
0.010
3N
D 3.6 M ! E OF CHMTOM
?111204
O0'"0 FEr-T DEPTH
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN
INDICATED
-------
NiTt c JTFC-OHIC
~°A- i AS V;-,AS
D4Y
74/06/22
74/07/21
74/08/18
74/09/22
74/10/?0
74/11/24
74/12/22
75/01/ 19
75/02/ 23
75/03/09
75/03/23
75/04/06
75/04/19
75/05/16
10
10
10
10
12
11
09
11
12
11
12
11
15
08
00
30
25
16
00
30
06
30
30
30
55
25
00
•Jl
- 75/11/23
SURVEY
35 35 DO.O 092 18 00.0
05
VAN
100 YDS B'LP HIDDEN VLY TRTMC^T pL &NT
ilePALrS 2111204
4 0000 PC = T
00631
X "°2SN"3
N -TOT 4 I
Mr,/L
3. 500
27.200
12.300
2. 160
1.120
0.192
0.310
0.19?
0. 104
0.835
0.116
0.347
0. 100
1.050
00625
"HI KJFL
N
MG/L
0.400
0.400
1.400
l.OCO
0.200
0.600
1.700
0.200
0.400
0.600
0.800
1.250
0.450
C.300
00610
NH3-N
TOTfiL
MG/L
0.015
0.042
0.045
0.045
0.020
0.032
0.055
0.056
0.032
0.096
0.024
0.053
0.100
0.030
i0671
PHOS-PI S
^RTHO
^G/L P
0.375
1.900
2.000
0.700
0.410
0.025
0. 140
0.015
0.008K
0.192
0.016
0.075
0.040
0.165
00b65
PHCS-T3T
MG/L P
0.410
2.000
2.100
0.720
0.44C
0.075
0.200
0.030
0.010
0.260
0.020
0.090
0.070
0.190
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN
INDICATED
-------
STQBCT ;. cTct-viL -);- = 75/11/23
0516-U PD051644 P001027*
35 34 30.0 092 26 35.0
GLUT 3V
35 VAN ?.U=:N C3 "AD
T/&-.SH3'- P c o R Y c.rS?5VO!5
S FK LITTLE S.ED "-IV5'
Uc3iLES 2141204
4 0000 FEET r,?CTH
FROM
TO
74/11/06
CP(T)-
74/11/06
75/01/23
CP(T»-
75/01/23
75/02/20
CP( T)-
75/02/20
75/03/12
CP(T|-
75/03/ 12
75/04/11
CP(T)-
75/04/ 11
75/04/25
CP(T)-
75/04/25
75/05/17
CP(T)-
75/05/17
75/06/12
CP(T)-
75/06/12
75/06/24
CPCT)-
75/06/24
75/07/01
CP(T|-
75/07/01
75/07/30
CP(T)-
75/07/30
r -
D£Y P5?T
11
16
11
16
11
16
11
16
11
16
11
16
11
24
11
15
11
16
11
15
11
16
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
30
00
00
00630
H -!^2{.N03
\-TJTAL
MG/L
0.08C-
0.080
0.330
0.080
0.050
0.050
0.050
0.050
0.025
0.025
•1.025
00625
*?T KJEL
N
MG/L
28.00(1
30.500
28.000
27.000
21.000
30.000
36.000
28.000
31.000
33.000
48.000
00610 00671 006o5 50051 50053
NH3-N tnPS-OIS PHCS-TOT FLOW CCND'J!T
MG/L MG/L P MG/L P INST «GD MONTHLY
11
16
14
16
11
17
14
14
13
8
10
.500
.800
,50C
.000
.OOC
.300
.50C
.000
.500
.300
.500
3.450
3.950
3.600
3.680
2. SCO
3.600
3.0CO
3.500
3.300
3.200
4.700
5.100
5.100
4.500
4.900
3.900
4.600
4.400
5.400
5.100
6.000
8.500
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
0.400
0.500
0.375
0.400
0.300
0.400
0.600
0.400
0.600
0.630
0.400
-------
3TQf-rT =?T;;=
MTL = 'JT -;~PH!
'Pi- LAS Vf~>^
= 75/11/29
051531 TFD51631
35 33 30.0 092 17 30.0
05
VAN SUprN CO •"/.?
GREERi
P001000
RESF"»VOIP
2141204
oooo FFET
DEPTH
TM5 3?3*H
n =
in
74/11/05
75/01/06
75/02/03
75/03/03
75/04/02
75/05/01
75/05/ 19
75/06/03
75/06/17
75/07/01
75/07/16
11
11
13
14
12
13
14
14
11
00
00
00
00
30
00
00
30
00
00
00
00
00630
:2CN03
TOT4L
MG/L
1.840
3.040
0.960
2.960
0.08C
4.100
6.400
12.000
4.900
11.000
7.800
10.500
00625
T" KJvL
N
W.G/L
l.OOOK
8.6CO
l.OOOK
1 .OOOK
1.300
2.100
2.6CO
2.700
2.600
4.900
2.300
3.500
00610
N'H3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.050K
0.080
0. 080K
0.080
0.080K
0.900
0.770
0.560
1.600
1.150
0.455
1.150
00671
PHjS-CIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.600
0.660
0.240
0.780
0.080K
2.100
6.800
4.600
3.300
2.700
6.700
9.100
00665
PHOS-TJT
MG/L P
0.618
0.788
0.400
0.910
0.340
2.300
7.200
4.400
3.300
3.000
6.900
9.100
50051
FLOW
RATE
INST MGO
0.020
0.014
0.020
0.012
0.025
0. 100
0.085
0.100
0.080
0.120
0.100
0.100
50053
CONHUIT
FLOW-*1Gr
MONTHLY
0.015
0.016
0.017
0.015
0.020
0.120
0.100
0.100
0.100
0.100
0.100
0.10C
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE LESS THAN
INDICATED
-------
APPENDIX E
PARAMETRIC RANKINGS OF LAKES
SAMPLED BY NES IN 1974
STATE OF ARKANSAS
-------
TO JE
l, 5 0 1 d £ a J r_ " L i •< E
030? BLACKFiS-1 LA<£.
0503 BLUE MOUNTAIN
0504 Bt'LL
0505 LA . t 0 7
496. 123
4^4.000
343. ^69
"51.667
486.000
419. U50
454. fcb7
479.667
•»2M.lll
466.778
469.000
35h.321
389. 144
410.778
370.875
«EAN
Ci-iLTi-A
3.921
19.775
-.983
3.993
14.042
13.722
12.300
13.389
62.^67
10.889
14.967
15.833
3.441
4.344
9.103
3.762
15-
MIM no
14.900
12.000
l*.6on
15.000
1 l.dOn
14.600
15.000
14.600
8.400
14.400
9.HOO
8.800
15.000
15.000
15.000
15.000
"EDI
OISS OPT
0.006
0.090
0.010
(.1.004
O.OOf-
0.089
0.004
0.020
0.021
0.006
0.008
0.006
0.005
0.006
0.007
0.004
-------
ct-Ct\T OF LAKES "I ITn
COQF LA*t NiiwE
ij 5 0 i = E 4 v E - L A * 5
1503
0504
0505
0506
0507
050«
0503
0510
0511
0512
0513
0514
0515
0516
dL'Jt "D'-lNT t I
BULL ^riOALS
LAr\E CATHF-tl
LA*E CnlCOT
DEGSAY
LAKE EKLING
GRAND LAKE
LAKE HAMILTON
MILLWOOD LAKE
NIMPOO LAKE
NORFOLK LAKE
LAKE OUACHITA
TABLE ROCK LAKE
; LAKE
UM^tr>. MI- i_A<::s *ir- I Jf
^EOIflN "c-TIAN
TOTAL ^ lNOJt N
<• 1 ( 7)
1 ( 0 )
2 '• < J )
en ( U)
*7 ( 7)
7 ( 1 )
73 ( 11)
27 ( *)
1? ( 2)
53 ( 6>
33 ( 5)
40 ( 6)
MO ( 12)
90 ( 13)
63 ( 9)
100 ( 15)
27
0
47
13
tO
7
77
90
100
77
90
53
33
60
20
67
( 4)
( 0)
( 7)
( 2)
( 6)
( 1)
( 11)
( 13)
( 15)
( 11)
( 13)
( 8)
( 5)
( 9)
( 3)
( 10)
,Ht u V
->00-
•'F AN
s7
o
13
100
47
7
60
40
20
53
33
27
93
80
73
87
/iLUtS)
SHC
( 10)
( C)
( 2)
( Ib)
( 7)
( 1)
( 9)
( 6)
( 3)
( 8)
( 5)
( 4)
( 14)
( 12)
( 11)
( 13)
MJ
GIL
67
7
67
80
27
33
47
40
0
53
20
13
100
73
60
93
:AN
,0^-A
( U>
I 1)
( 10)
( 12)
( 4)
( 5)
( 7)
( 6)
( 0)
( 6)
( 3)
( 2)
( 15)
( ID
( 9)
( 14)
15-
MIN DO
in (
73 (
57 (
17 (
«0 (
47 (
17 (
57 (
100 (
67 (
87 (
93 (
17 (
17 (
17 (
17 (
6)
11)
ft)
0 )
12)
7)
0)
8)
15)
10)
13)
14)
0)
0)
0)
0)
"ED
OISS 0'
63 (
0 (
27 (
93 (
t»3 (
7 (
93 (
20 (
13 (
63 (
33 (
47 (
80 (
63 (
40 (
93 (
I 4N.
n~io
«>
0)
4)
13)
8)
1 )
13)
3)
2)
«)
5)
7)
12)
P)
6)
13)
------- |