U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
               NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
                         WORKING PAPER SERIES

                                               REPORT
                                                 ON
                                         JOHN REDMOND RESERVOIR
                                        COFFEY AND LYON COUNTIES
                                               KANSAS
                                            EPA REGION VII
                                         WORKING PAPER No, 515
     CORVALLIS ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY - CORVALLIS, OREGON
                                  and
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING & SUPPORT LABORATORY - LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
•&G.P.O. 699-440

-------
                                     REPORT
                                       ON
                             JOHN REDMOND RESERVOIR
                            COFFEY AND LYON COUNTIES
                                     KANSAS
                                 EPA EGION VII
                             WORKING PAPER No, 515
        WITH THE COOPERATION OF THE
KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT
                  AND THE
           KANSAS NATIONAL GUARD
                APRIL,  1977

-------
                                   CONTENTS
                                                               Page
  Foreword                                                      ii
  List of Kansas Study Reservoirs                               iv
  Lake and Drainage Area Map                                     v

  Sections
  I.   Conclusions                                        .        1
 II.   Lake and Drainage Basin Characteristics                    4
III.   Lake Water Quality Summary                                 5
 IV.   Nutrient Loadings                           .              10
  V.   Literature Reviewed                                       16
 VI.   Appendices                                                17

-------
                                 11
                          FOREWORD
    The National Eutrophication Survey was initiated in 1972 in
response to an Administration commitment to investigate the nation-
wide threat of accelerated eutrophication to freshwater lakes and
reservoirs.

OBJECTIVES

    The Survey was designed to develop, in conjunction with state
environmental agencies, information on nutrient sources, concentrations,
and impact on selected freshwater lakes as a basis for formulating
comprehensive and coordinated national, regional, and state management
practices relating to point-source discharge reduction and non-point
source pollution abatement in lake watersheds.

ANALYTIC APPROACH

    The mathematical and statistical procedures selected for the
Survey's eutrophication analysis are based on related concepts that:

        a.  A generalized representation or model relating
    sources, concentrations, and impacts can be constructed.

        b.  By applying measurements of relevant parameters
    associated with lake degradation, the generalized model
    can be transformed into an operational representation of
    a lake, its drainage basin, and related nutrients.

        c.  With such a transformation, an assessment of the
    potential for eutrophication control can be made.

LAKE ANALYSIS

    In this report, the first stage of evaluation of lake and water-
shed data collected from the study lake and its drainage basin is
documented.  The report is formatted to provide state environmental
agencies with specific information for basin planning [§303(e)]» water
quality criteria/standards review [§303(c)], clean lakes [§314(a,b)],
and water quality monitoring [§106 and S305(b)] activities mandated
by the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972.

-------
                                 iii
    Beyond the single lake analysis, broader based correlations
between nutrient concentrations (and loading) and trophic condi-
tion are being made to advance the rationale and data base for
refinement of nutrient water quality criteria for the Nation's
freshwater lakes.  Likewise, multivariate evaluations for the
relationships between land use, nutrient export, and trophic
condition, by lake class or use, are being developed to assist
in the formulation of planning guidelines and policies by EPA
and to au.qment plans implementation by the states.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

    The staff of the National Eutrophication Survey (Office of
Research & Development, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency)
expresses sincere appreciation to the Kansas State Department of
Health and Environment for professional involvement, to the Kansas
National Guard for conducting the tributary sampling phase of
the Survey, and to those Kansas wastewater treatment plant opera-
tors who voluntarily provided effluent samples and flow data.

    The staff of the Kansas Division of Environmental  Health pro-
vided invaluable lake documentation and counsel  during the Survey,
reviewed the preliminary reports, and provided critiques most use-
ful in the preparation of this Working Paper series.

    Major General Edward R. Fry, the Adjutant General  of Kansas,
and Project Officer Colonel Albin L. Lundquist,  who directed the
volunteer efforts of the Kansas National  Guardsmen, are also grate-
fully acknowledged for their assistance to the Survey.

-------
                                    iv


                      NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY

                             STUDY RESERVOIRS

                             STATE OF KANSAS

NAME                                                         COUNTY

Cedar Bluff                                                  Trego
Council Grove                                                Morris
Elk City                                                     Montgomery
Fall River                                                   Greenwood
John Redmond                                                 Coffey, Lyon
Kanopolis                                                    Ellsworth
Marion                                                       Marion
Melvern                                                      Osage
Mil ford                                                      Clay, Geary
Norton                                                       Norton
Perry                                                        Jefferson
Pomona                                                       Osage
Toronto                                                      Greenwood, Woodson
Tuttle Creek                                                 Marshall, Potta-
                                                              watomie, Riley
Wilson                                                       Russell

-------
JOHN REDMOND  RESERVOIR
        Tributary Sampling Site
        Lake Sampling Site
        Sewage Treatment Facility
        Land Subject to Inundation
                10
            '  Scale10 Mi.
                            ,
50 Kill.

-------
                          JOHN REDMOND RESERVOIR
                              STORE! NO. 2005

I.  CONCLUSIONS
    A.  Trophic Condition:
            Survey data indicate John Redmond Reservoir is potentially
        eutrophic.  However, because of persistant turbidity and resulting
        light-limitation, primary productivity is low to moderate (Kring,
        1977).
            This water body ranked fourteenth in overall trophic quality
        when the fifteen Kansas reservoirs sampled in 1974 were compared
        using a combination of six water quality parameters*.  Twelve of
        the reservoirs had less median total phosphorus, 13 had less
        median dissolved orthophosphorus, 14 had less median inorganic
        nitrogen, seven had less mean chlorophyll a^, and 14 had greater
        mean Secchi disc transparency.
            Survey limnologists did not observe surface concentrations
        of algae but did note submerged macrophytes along the shoreline
        at station 2 in October.  Due to lack of light penetration (mean
        Secchi disc depth of about 0.2 meters), productivity was only
        moderate as indicated by the chlorophyll 
-------
    been attributed to possible cultural  enrichment by upstream
    sources (Prather and Prophet, 1969; Prophet,  Prather,  and
    Edwards, 1970).
B.  Rate-Limiting Nutrient:
        The algal assay results indicate John Redmond Reservoir was
    phosphorus limited at the time the sample was collected (10/01/75).
    The reservoir data indicate phosphorus limitation at all  sampling
    stations and times.  However, because of turbidity, primary pro-
    ductivity in the reservoir is light-limited rather than nutrient-
    limited.
C.  Nutrient Controllability:
        1.  Point sources—During the sampling year,  point sources
    contributed 24.2% of the total phosphorus load to John Redmond
    Reservoir.  The wastewater treatment plant at Emporia accounted
    for 20.9% of this total, and nine other facilities collectively
    contributed 3.2%.
        The present phosphorus loading of 9.20 g/tn 2/year is over
    eight times that proposed by Vollenweider (Vollenweider and Dillon,
    1974) as a eutrophic loading (see page 15); however, since primary
    productivity in the reservoir is light-limited rather than nutrient-
    limited, point-source phosphorus control would not be expected to
    result in significant improvement in the condition of the reser-
    voir.

-------
            2.  Non-point sources--Non-point sources contributed 75.8%
        of the total phosphorus input.  The Cottonwood River contributed
        51.2%, the Neosho River contributed 17.3%, Badger Creek contrib-
        uted 1.1%, and Eagle Creek contributed 1.0%.  The ungaged minor
        tributaries and immediate drainage contributed an estimated 5.0%.
            The phosphorus export rates of the tributaries of this reser-
        voir (page 14) were similar to the rates of the tributaries of
        Council Grove Reservoir* upstream in the Neosho River drainage (60,
        41, and 6 kg/km2/yr) and a tributary of Marion Reservoir** upstream
        in the Cottonwood River drainage (22 kg/km2/yr).
* Working Paper No. 512
** Working Paper No. 517

-------
II.   RESERVOIR AND DRAINAGE BASIN CHARACTERISTICS1"

     A.   Morphometry  :

         1.   Surface area:   38.04 kilometers2.

         2.   Mean depth:   2.0 meters.

         3.   Maximum depth:  7.6 meters.

         4.   Volume:  76.080 x 106  m3.

         5.   Mean hydraulic retention  time:   23  days  (based on outflow).

     B.   Tributary and Outlet:
         (See Appendix C  for flow data)

         1.   Tributaries  -

                                              Drainage       Mean flow
             Name                             area  (km2)*    (m3/sec)*

             Neosho River                        2,007.2          9.85
             Eagle Creek                           142.2          0.96
             Cottonwood River                    4,843.3         20.65
             Badger Creek                          72.0          0.50
             Minor tributaries &
              immediate drainage -                 706.1          8.43

                              Totals              7,770.8         40.39**

         2.   Outlet -

             Neosho River                        7,808.8***      38.73

     C.   Precipitation****:

         1.   Year of sampling:   114.5  centimeters.

         2.   Mean annual:   93.5 centimeters.
 f Table of metric  conversions—Appendix  B.
 tt Stoltenberg,  1975.
 * For limits  of  accuracy,  see  Working  Paper No.  175,  "...Survey Methods,
   1973-1976".
 ** Sum of inlets adjusted  to equal  the outlet  flow plus evaporation.
 *** Includes  area  of reservoir.
 **** see Working Paper No.  175.

-------
III.   WATER QUALITY SUMMARY
      John Redmond Reservoir was  sampled three times  during  the  open-water
  season of 1974 by means of a pontoon-equipped Huey  helicopter.   Each
  time,  samples for physical  and  chemical  parameters  were  collected  from
  one or more depths at two stations  on the reservoir (see map,  page v).
  During each visit, a single depth-integrated (near  bottom  to surface)
  sample was composited from the  stations  for phytoplankton  identification
  and enumeration; and during the last visit,  a single 18.9-liter  depth-
  integrated sample was composited for algal  assays.   Also each  time, a
  depth-integrated sample was collected from each  of  the stations  for
  chlorophyll ^analysis.  The maximum depths  sampled were 1.5 meters
  at  station 1 and 0.9 meters at  station 2.
      The sampling results are presented in full  in Appendix D and are
  summarized in the following table.

-------
PARAMETER


TEMP (C)


OISS OXY (MG/D


CNDCTVY (MCROMO)


PH (STAND UNITS)


TOT ALK (MG/D


TOT P (MG/L)


ORTHO P (MG/L)


N02+N03 (MG/L)


AMMONIA (MG/L)


KJEL N  (MG/L)


INORG N (MG/L)


TOTAL N (MG/L)


CHLRPYL A (UG/L)


SECCHI  (METERS)
       A. SUMMARY OF PHYSICAL AND



       1ST SAMPLING ( 4/11/74)


             2 SITES


     RANGE        MEAN   MEDIAN


 11.5  -  17.3    13.4    11.5


  9.2  -   9.4     9.3     9.3


 262.  -  375.    314.    305.


  8.3  -   8.3     8.3     8.3


 200.  -  226.    217.    226.


0.133  - 0.720   0.339   0.163


0.063  - 0.069   0.066   0.066


1.110  - l.?10   1.163   1.170


0.080  - 0.110   0.090   0.080


0.600  - 1.800   1.067   0.300


1.190  - 1.320   1.253   1.25C


1.810  - 2.910   2.230   1.970


 15.2  -  16.1    15.6    15.6


  0.1  -   0.2     0.2     0.2
                                                        CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS FOR JOHN REDMOND RESERVOIR
                                                         STORET COOE 2005
       2ND SAMPLING ( 6/23/74)


             2 SITES


     RANGE


 23.3  -  23.5


  6.8  -   7.6


 411.  -  422.


  8.3  -   8.4


 153,  -  163.


0.090  - 0.152


0.087  - 0.117


1.520  - 1.620


0.050  - 0.070


0.200  - 0.500


1.580  - 1.670


1.760  - 2.120


  2.6  -   2.9


  0.0  -   0.3     0.2     0.2
 MEAN   MEDIAN


 23.3    23.3


  7.0


 418.


  8.3


 159.


0.112


0.101


1.575   1.580


0.062   0.065


        0.300


        1.650


        1.860


          2.7
0.325


1.637


1.900


  2.7


  0.2
          6.9


         419.


          8.3


         160.


        0.104


        0.101
       3RO SAMPLING  <10/ 1/74)


             2 SITES


     RANGE        MEAN   MEDIAN


 15.1  -  15.6    15.4    15.4


  8.0  -   8.6     8.2     8.2


 263.  -  333.    304.    309.


  7.7  -   6.0     7.9     7.9


 156.  -  158.    157.    157,,


0.108  - 0.128   0.117   0.116


0.053  - 0.057   0.055   0.055


0.680  - 0.720   0.705   0.710


0.050  - 0.080   0.065   0.065    en


0.300  - 0.900   0.575   0.550


0.750  - 0.800   0.770   0.765


1.020  - 1.580   1.280   1.260


  5.8  -  1<*.2    10.0    10.0


  0.2  -   0.2     0.2     0.2

-------
B.  Biological characteristics:

    1.   Phytoplankton -
        Sampl i ng
        Date

        04/11/74
        06/23/74
        10/01/74
Dominant
Genera

1.  Stephanodiscus sp.
2.  Centric diatoms
3.  Chroomonas sp.
4.  Actinastrum sp.
5.  Melosira sp.
    Other genera

            Total

1.  Melosira sp.
2.  Flagellates
3.  Stephanodiscus sp.
4.  Cyclotella ^>.
5.  Oscillatoria sp.
    Other genera

            Total

1.  Stephanodiscus sp.
2.  Chroomonas sp.
3.  Gloeocystis sp.
4.  Cryptomonas sp.
5.  Pennate diatoms
Algal Units
per ml	

    1,143
      842
      421
      241
      180
      542

    3,369
    1,180

      167
      139
      139
       83
       56
                                          Total
                                 584

-------
                                 8
    2.  Chlorophyll
C.
Sampling
Date
04/11/74

06/23/74

10/01/74

Limiting Nutrient Study:
1. Autoclaved, filtered
Station
Number
1
2
1
2
1
2








Chlorophyll a
(WJ/1)
16.1
15.2
2.6
2.9
5.8
14.2

, and nutrient spiked -
Ortho P
Spike (mg/1) Cone. (m3/ll
Control
0.050 P
0.050 P + 1.0 N
1.0 N
2. Discussion -
The control yiel
cornutum, indicates
0.010
0.060
0.060
0.010

d of the
that the
Inorganic N
Cone, (mg/1)
0.152
0.152
1.152
1.152

Maximum yield
(mg/1 -dry wt.)
12.8
18.5
26.2
12.2

assay alga, Selenastrum capri-
potential primary
productivity
        of John Redmond Reservoir was high at the time the  sample
        was collected (10/01/75).  Also,  the significant  increase  in
        yield with the addition of phosphorus alone  indicates  the
        reservoir was phosphorus limited  at that  time.  Note that
        the addition of nitrogen alone resulted  in a yield  not sig-

-------
nificantly different from that of the control.
    The reservoir data indicate phosphorus limitation as
well.  However, because of persistent turbidity, the
reservoir is light-limited rather than nutrient-limited
(Kring, 1977).

-------
                                     10
IV.   NUTRIENT LOADINGS
     (See Appendix E for data)
     For the determination of nutrient loadings,  the  Kansas National
 Guard collected monthly near-surface  grab  samples  from each of the
 tributary sites indicated on the map  (page v),  except for the months
 of May, June,  and July when two  samples  were  collected.  Sampling
 was begun in October, 1974,  and  was completed in September, 1975.
     Through an interagency agreement,  stream  flow  estimates for the
 year of sampling and a "normalized" or average  year  were provided by
 the Kansas District Office of the U.S. Geological  Survey for the
 tributary sites nearest the reservoir.
     In this report, nutrient loads for sampled  tributaries were
 determined by using a modification of a  U.S.  Geological Survey computer
 program for calculating stream loadings*.   Nutrient  loads shown are
 those measured minus point-source loads, if any.
     Nutrient loads for unsampled "minor  tributaries  and immediate
 drainage" ("ZZ" of U.S.G.S.) were estimated using  the nutrient loads
 at station C-l, in kg/km2/year,  and multiplying by the ZZ area in km2.
     The operators of the Cottonwood Falls, Emporia,  and Strong City
 wastewater treatment plants provided  monthly  effluent samples and
 corresponding flow data.   The operators  of the  wastewater treatment
 plants at Hartford, Lebo, and Olpe also  provided samples; however, cor-
 responding flow data were not available.   Nutrient loads from these
 *  See Working  Paper No.  175.

-------
                                    11
plants and from the wastewater treatment plants at Americus, Council

Grove, Florence, and Marion, which were not sampled, were estimated

at 1.134 kg P and 3.401 kg N/capita/year; and flows were estimated at

0.3785 m3/capita/day.

    A.  Waste Sources:

        1.  Known municipal* -

Name
Americus**
Cottonwood Fall

Council Grove**
Emporia***

Florence**
Hartford
Lebo
Marion**

01 pe
Strong City

Pop.
Served
345
s 1,076

3,000
23,879

900
539
921
2,200

463
626



Treatment
stab
stab

stab
tr.

stab
stab
stab
stab

stab
tr.

. pond
. pond

. pond
filter

. pond
. pond
. pond
. pond

. pond
filter

Mean Flow
(m3/d)
130.6
378.5

1,135.5
21,639.9

340.7
204.0
348.6
832.7

175.2
252.0

Receiving
Water
Pester Creek
Cottonwood
River
Neosho River
Cottonwood
River
Doyle Creek
Neosho River
Lebo Creek
Cottonwood
River
Eagle Creek
Cottonwood
River
        2.  Industrial - Unknown
* Treatment plant questionnaires.
** Anonymous, 1971.
*** More than 25% of the total waste load is from meat packing, chrome
    plating, creameries, laundries, and a soy-bean mill.

-------
                                    12
    B.  Annual Total Phosphorus Loading - Average Year:

        1.  Inputs -

                                              kg P/          % of
            Source                            yr             total
            a.  Tributaries (non-point load) -

                Neosho River                   60,615         17.3
                Eagle Creek                     3,550          1.0
                Cottonwood River              179,110         51.2
                Badger Creek                    3,710          1.1

            b.  Minor tributaries & immediate
                 drainage (non-point load) -   17,655          5.0

            c.  Known municipal STP's -

                Americus                          390          0.1
                Cottonwood Falls                  715          0.2
                Council Grove                   3,400          1.0
                Emporia                        73,235         20.9
                Florence                        1,020          0.3
                Hartford                          610          0.2
                Lebo                            1,045          0.3
                Marion                          2,495          0.7
                01pe                              525          0.2
                Strong City                     1,115          0.3

            d.  Septic tanks - Unknown            ?

            e.  Industrial - Unknown              ?

            f.  Direct precipitation* -           665          0.2

                        Total                 349,855        100.0

        2.  Outputs -

            Reservoir outlet - Neosho River   199,875

        3.  Net annual P accumulation - 149,980 kg.
* See Working Paper No. 175.

-------
                                    13
    C.  Annual Total Nitrogen Loading - Average Year:

        1.  Inputs -

                                              kg N/          % of
            Source                            yr             total
            a.  Tributaries (non-point load) -

                Neosho River                  833,685         21.3
                Eagle Creek                   109,935          2.8
                Cottonwood River            2,116,525         54.0
                Badger Creek                   46,185          1.2

            b.  Minor tributaries & immediate
                 drainage (non-point load) -  545,815         13.9

            c.  Known municipal STP's -

                Americus                        1,175         <0.1
                Cottonwood Falls                1,845         <0.1
                Council  Grove                  10,205          0.3
                Emporia                       195,585          5.0
                Florence                        3,060          0.1
                Hartford                        1,835         <0.1
                Lebo                            3,130          0.1
                Marion                          7,480          0.2
                Olpe                            1,575         <0.1
                Strong City                     3,135          0.1

            d.  Septic tanks - Unknown            ?

            e.  Industrial - Unknown              ?

            f.  Direct precipitation* -        41,070          1.0

                        Total                3,922,240        100.0

        2.  Outputs -

            Reservoir outlet - Neosho River 2,480,455

        3.  Net annual N accumulation - 1,441,785 kg.
* See Working Paper No.  175.

-------
                                14
D.  Non-point Nutrient Export by Subdrainage Area:

    Tributary                             kg P/km2/yr    kg N/km.2/.yr

    Neosho River                              30             415
    Eagle Creek                               25             773
    Cottonwood River                          37             437
    Badger Creek                              52             641

E.  Mean Nutrient Concentrations in Ungaged Stream:

                                          Mean Total  P   Mean Total  N
    Tributary                             Cone,  (mg/1)   Cone,  (mg/1)

    Otter Creek                               0.076           1.820

-------
                                15
F.   Yearly Loads:
        In the following table,  the existing phosphorus loadings
    are compared to those proposed by Vollenweider (Vollenweider
    and Dillon, 1974).   Essentially, his "dangerous"  loading  is
    one at which the receiving water would become eutrophic or
    remain eutrophic;  his "permissible" loading is that which
    would result in the receiving water remaining oligotrophic
    or becoming oligotrophic if morphometry permitted.   A meso-
    trophic loading would be considered one between "dangerous"
    and "permissible".
        Note that Vollenweider's model  may not be applicable  to
    water bodies with  short hydraulic retention times.
                              Total  Phosphorus       Total Nitrogen
    	Total    Accumulated    Total   Accumulated
    grams/m2/yr             9.20       3.94        103.1       37.9
    Vollenweider phosphorus  loadings
     (g/fli2/yr)  based  on mean depth and mean
     hydraulic  retention time of John Redmond  Reservoir:
        "Dangerous"   (eutrophic  loading)              1.08
        "Permissible"  (oligotrophic loading)         0.54

-------
                                    16
V.  LITERATURE REVIEWED

    Anonymous, 1971.  Inventory of municipal waste facilities.   EPA
        Publ. OWP-1, vol. 7, Wash., DC.

    Kring, R. Lynn, 1977.  Personal communication (primary productivity
        in reservoir).  KS Dept. of Health & Environment,  Topeka.

    Prather, Joy E., and Carl W. Prophet, 1969.  Zooplankton species
        diversity in John Redmond, Marion, and Council Grove reservoirs,
        Kansas, summer 1968.  Emporia St. Res. Studies vol. XVIII(l),
        KS St. Teachers Coll., Emporia.

    Prophet, Carl W., Joy E. Prather, and N. Leon Edwards, 1970.  Com-
        parison of summer water quality features in three Grand River
        reservoirs, Kansas.  Emporia St.  Res. Studies vol. XVIII(4),
        KS St. Teachers Coll., Emporia.

    Stoltenberg,  Gerald A., 1975.  Personal communication (reservoir
        morphometry). KS Dept. of Health & Environment, Topeka.

    Vollenweider, R. A., and P. J. Dillon, 1974.  The application of
        the phosphorus loading concept to eutrophication research.
        Natl. Res. Council of Canada Publ. No. 13690, Canada Centre
        for Inland Waters, Burlington, Ontario.

-------
VI.   APPENDICES
                                  17
                                   APPENDIX A
                                  LAKE RANKINGS

-------
LAKE DATA TO BE USED IN RANKINGS
LAKE
CODE  LAKE NAME
2001  CEDAR BLUFF RESERVOIR
2002  COUNCIL GROVE
2003  ELK CITY
2004  FALL RIVER RESERVOIR
2005  JOHN REDMOND RESERVOIR
2006  KANOPOLIS RESERVOIR
2007  MARION RESERVOIR
2008  MELVERN RESERVOIR
2009  MILFORD RESERVOIR
2010  NORTON RESERVOIR
2011  PERRY RESERVOIR
2012  POMONA RESERVOIR
2013  TORONTO RESERVOIR
2014  TUTTLE CREEK RESERVOIR
2015  WILSON RESERVOIR
MEDIAN
TOTAL P
0.017
0.069
0.030
0.053
0.118
0.056
0.052
0.034
0.079
0.123
0.055
0.040
0.067
0.163
0.023
MEDIAN
INO'RG N
0.055
0.830
0.590
0.470
1.250
0.640
0.430
0.265
0.710
0.110
0.970
1.240
0.425
0.970
0.265
500-
MEAN SEC
431.667
485.889
490.400
488,667
492.667
487.000
483.667
459.111
466.333
476.750
478.571
481.333
488.500
470.667
445.222
MEAN
CHLORA
4.217
9.789
3.212
7.683
9.467
16.033
12.400
30.400
18.833
21.360
5.614
8.312
6.583
11.278
8.867
15-
MIN DO
10.800
10.400
14.000
9.200
8.200
10.200
9.000
14.400
12.800
8.000
13.400
13.000
13.000
13.600
13.400
MEDIAN
DISS CRTriO P
0.004
0.028
0.003
0.016
0.066
0.011
0.010'
0.007
0.036
0.036
0.017
0.021
0.011
0.067
0.004

-------
LAKES RANKED BY INDEX NOS.



RANK  LAKE CODE  LAKE NAME               INDEX NO






   1  2001       CEDAR BLUFF RESERVOIR      539



   2  2015       WILSON RESERVOIR           439



   3  2007       MARION RESERVOIR           357



   4  2003       ELK CITY                   350



   5  2004       FALL RIVER RESERVOIR       328



   6  2008       MELVERN RESERVOIR          326



   7  2013       TORONTO RESERVOIR          303



   fl  2010       NORTON RESERVOIR           292



   9  2011       PERRY RESERVOIR            279



  10  2006       KANOPOLIS RESERVOIR        271



  11  2012       POMONA RESERVOIR           267



  12  2002       COUNCIL GROVE              230



  13  2009       MILFORD RESERVOIR          214



  14  2005       JOHN REDMOND RESERVOIR     164



  15  2014       TUTTLE CREEK RESERVOIR     139

-------
PERCENT OF LAKES WITH HIGHER VALUES (NUMBER OF LAKES WITH HIGHER VALUES)
LAKE
CODE  LAKE NAME

2001  CEDAR BLUFF RESERVOIR

2003  COUNCIL GROVE

2003  ELK CITY

2004  FALL RIVER RESERVOIR

2005  JOHN REDMOND RESERVOIR

2006  KANOPOLIS RESERVOIR

2007  MARION RESERVOIR

2008  MELVERN RESERVOIR

2009  MILFORO RESERVOIR

2010  NORTON RESERVOIR

2011  PERRY RESERVOIR

2012  POMONA RESERVOIR

2013  TORONTO RESERVOIR

2014  TUTTLE CREEK RESERVOIR

2015  WILSON RESERVOIR
MEDIAN
TOTAL P
100 <
29 (
86 (
57 (
14 <
43 <
64 (
79 (
21 1
7 (
50 1
71 <
36 l
0 '
93 1
: 14)
! 4)
1 12)
; 8)
: 2)
: 6)
: 9)
1 11)
1 3)
[ 1)
[ 7)
I 10)
[ 5)
( 0)
! 13)
MEDIAN
INOSG N
100 <
29 (
50 (
57 (
0 (
43 (
64 <
82 <
36 <
93 (
18 <
7 1
71 <
18 <
82 1
14)
4)
7)
8)
0)
6)
9)
11)
5)
1 13)
: 2)
! 1)
; 10)
I 2)
1 ID
500-
MEAN SEC
100 1
36 (
7 1
14 1
0 1
29 1
43 1
86 1
79 1
64 1
57 1
50 i
21 i
71
93 <
; 14)
: s>
; i)
: 2)
: o)
! 4)
[ 6)
! 12)
I 11)
I 9)
I 8)
t 7)
t 3)
( 10)
t 13)
MEAN
CHLOSA
93 (
43 (
100 <
71 (
50 <
21 (
29 <
0 1
14 <
7 1
86 1
64 1
79 1
36 <
57 1
: i3>
6)
; 14)
10)
: 7)
3)
; 4)
; o>
; 2>
i i)
! 12)
[ 9)
[ 11)
: 5)
[ 8)
15-
MIN DO
57 <
64 <
7 <
79 (
93 (
71 <
86 (
0 (
50 (
100 1
25 1
39 1
39 1
14 i
25 l
: 8)
9)
: i)
ID
13)
10)
: 12)
: 0)
: 7)
! 14)
: 3)
I 5)
[ 5)
I 2)
1 3)
MEDIAN
DISS ORTHO P
89 (
29 (
100 <
50 (
7 <
64 (
71 (
79 1
14 1
21 i
43 1
36 i
57 i
0 (
89 i
12)
4)
i 14)
7)
! 1)
: 9)
: 10)
[ in
; 2)
: 3)
I 6)
t 5)
[ 8)
( 0)
[ 12)
INDEX
NO
539
230
350
328
164
271
357
326
214
292
279
: 267
303
139
439

-------
    APPENDIX B





CONVERSION FACTORS

-------
                CONVERSION FACTORS




Hectares x 2.471 = acres



Kilometers x 0.6214 = miles



Meters x 3.281 = feet


                         -4
Cubic meters x 8.107 x 10   = acre/feet



Square kilometers x 0.3861 = square miles



Cubic meters/sec x 35.315 = cubic feet/sec



Centimeters x 0.3937 = inches

  «

Kilograms x 2.205 = pounds



Kilograms/square kilometer x 5.711 = Ibs/square mile

-------
    APPENDIX C
TRIBUTARY FLOW DATA

-------
                                   TRIBUTARY FLO* INFORMATION FOR KANSAS
                                                                              05/03/76
LAKE CODE 2005     JOnN REDMOND

     TOTAL DRAINAGE ApEA OF LAKE(SO KM)   7808.8
          SUB-DRAINAGE
TRIBUTARY'  AREA(SO KM)
                                                    NORMALIZED FLOnS(CMS)
2G05A1
2005A2
2005C1
200501
2005E1
2005ZZ
7808.8
2007.2
 142.2
4343.3
  72.0
 744.1
JAN
22.65
4.25
0.43
6.21
0.25
2.38
FE8
26.33
5.95
0.59
11.89
0.31
3.11
MAR
36.81
10.19
1.42
18.97
0.76
5.95
APR
56.63
15.01
1.53
31.15
0.76
7.93
MAY
67.96
16.42
1.67
33.93
0.88
8.76
JUN
82.12
20.10
1.50
45.31
0.74
9.34
JUL
67.96
14.72
1.50
31.15
0.79
7.93
ADO SEP
I5.o6 15.29
6.23 8.78
0.48 0.63
14.^4 19.26
0.23 0.31
3.68 4.53
OCT
33.98
7.65
0.79
15.57
0.42
4.25
NOv
18.69
5.10
0.45
10.76
0.22
2.75
DEC
19.82
3.68
0.45
7.08
0.25
2.27
MEAN
38.73
9.85
0.96
20.65
0.50
5.25
SUMMARY
TOTAL
SUM OF
DRAINAGE
AREA OF
LAKE =
SUB-DRAINAGE AREAS =
7808.8
7808.8




TOTAL FLOW IN =
TOTAL FLOW OUT =
446.23
464.11






     MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOwS(CMS)
TRIBUTARY   MONTH   YEAR
2005A1
                MEAN FLOW  DAY
FLOW  DAY
FLOW  DAY
                                                                           FLUW
2005A2
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
74
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
74
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
11.695
78.154
38. 79<*
31.149
69.093
63.430
77.022
21.832
192.838
66.261
5.267
9.769
4.531
17.840
5.947
9.061
14.725
10.477
22.370
6.230
33.980
19.822
1.218
0.991
13
10
15
12
9
8
13
10
14
10
10
13
12
23
3
11
8
8
12
18
16
28
9
14
5.947
4.474
67.394
1.444
48.705
79.854
108.737
13.989 31
272.691 29
62.580 28
3.738
11.044
0.538
25.485
3.398
17.556
9.061
7.079
21.238
3.115 28
17.556 29
0.793
0.311
0.159







57.766
353.960
10.760









5.380
28.317




-------
                                   TRIBUTARY FLOW INFORMATION FOR KANSAS
                                                                                          05/03/76
LAKE CODE 2005
            REDMOND
     MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS(CMS)
TRIBUTARY




2005C1
2005E1
2005ZZ
MONTH
YEAR
MEAN FLOW  DAY
                               FLOW   DAY
                                                         FLO*  DAY
                                                                           FLOW
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2.
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
74
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
74
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
74
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
74
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
0.425
1.671
0.821
0.963
1.727
1.756
1.501
1.246
4.248
0.215
0.016
0.023
9.628
33.980
14.442
19.539
45.307
36.812
53.802
18.972
167.069
22.653
9.061
2.152
0.821
1.104
0.311
0.765
1.133
0.991
0.850
0.396
2.152
0.096
0.048
0.011
4.248
11.893
3.398
5.947
10.194
7.362
8.212
5.097
27.184
1.048
0.311
0.159
13
10
15
12
9
8
13
10
14
10
10
13
13
10
15
12
9
8
13
10
14
10
10
13
13
23
3
11
8
8
12
10
16
10
9
13












o.oco
0.340
0.595
0.878
0.425
0.481
0.261
0.122 31
0.269 29
0.113 28
0.001
0.000
39.644
33.980
20.954
31.149
36.812
36.812
39.644
12.743 31
65.129 29
29.733 28
4.531
5.097
2.832
0.085
0.085
1.699
0.170
0.566
0.164
0.051 28
0.096 29
0.028 12
0.005
0.037



















0.368
0.113
0.003









42.475
70.792
6.796









2.632
0.311
0.023














                                                                            28
                                                                         0.004

-------
        APPENDIX D





PHYSICAL and CHEMICAL DATA

-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/05/03
                                                                  300501
                                                                 38 14 35.0 095 45 23.0 3
                                                                 JOHN REDMOND RESERVOIR
                                                                 20031   KANSAS
                                                                                          100491
DATE
FROM
TO
74/04/11
74/06/23
74/10/01

DATE
FROM
TO
74/04/11

74/06/23


74/10/01


TIME
OF
DAY
13
13
10
10
09
09

00
00
00
00
50
SO

TIME
OF
DAY
13
13
10
10
10
09
09
09


00
00
00
00
00
50
SO
50
DEPTH
FEET
0000
0005
0000
0005
0000
0005

DEPTH

FEET
0000
0005
0000
0003
0005
0000
0002
0005
00010
*ATER
TEMP
CENT
11.5
11.5
23.5
23.3
15.3
15.1
00665
PHOS-TOT

MG/L P
0.163
0.133
0.112

0.096
0.118

0.128
11EPALES 2111202
0010 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00300 00077 00094 00400 00410 00610 00625 00630 00671
DO TRANSP CNDUCTVY PH T ALK NH3-N TOT KJEL N02&N03 PHOS-DIS
SECCHI FIELD CAC03 TOTAL N N-TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L INCHES MICROMHO SU MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P

9.
7.
6.
8.
8.
9 305 8.25
* 375 8.25
0 1 415 8.40
8 411 8.30
0 9 287 7.71
0 263 7.79
226 OoOSO 0.800 1.170 0.069
226 0.110 0.600 1.210 0.066
159 0.060 0.300 1.520 0.109
153 Oo070 0.300 1.600 0.093
157 Oo070 0.900 0.680 0.056
156 0»060 0.500 0.700 0.053
32217 00031
CHLRPHYL INCDT LT
A
OG/L
16.

2.


5.


REMNING
PERCENT
1

6
1.0

a
1.0












-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 76/05/03
  DATE   TIME DEPTH  WATER
  FROM    OF
   TO    DAY  FEET

74/04/11 13 20 0000
74/06/25 09 45 0000
         09 45 0002
74/10/01 10 10 0000
         10 10 0003
  DATE   TIME DEPTH
  FROM    OF
   TO    DAY  FEET

74/04/11 13 20 0000
74/06/25 09 45 0000
         09 45 0002
74/10/01 10 10 0000
         10 10 0002
         10 10 0003
                                                                  200502
                                                                 38 16 30.0 095 49 15.0 4
                                                                 JOHN REDMOND RESERVOIR
                                                                 20031   KANSAS
                                                                                          100492
                                                                 11EPALES             2111202
                                                                  0003 FEET  DEPTH  CLASS  00
0010
TER
EMP
ENT
17.3
23.3
23.3
15.6
15.6
0665
iS-TOT

i/L P
0.720
0.152
0.090
0.108

00300
DO

MG/L
9.2
7.6
6.8
8.6
8.4
32217
CHLRPHYL
A
UG/L
15.2
2.9

14.2

00077
TRANSP
SECCHI
INCHES
4
12

9

00031
INCDT LT
REMNING
PERCENT


1.0

1.0
00094
CNDUCTVY
FIELD
MICROMHO
262
422
422
333
331









00400
PH

SU
8.25
8.40
8.30
8.01
8.01









00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
200
163
160
158
156









00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.080
0.050
0.070
0.080
0.050









00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
1.800
0.500
0.200
0.600
0.300









00630
N02«»N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
1.110
1.620
1.560
0.720
0.720









00671
PHOS-OIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.063
0.117
0.087
0.057
0.055









0.115

-------
       APPENDIX E

TRIBUTARY AND WASTEWATER
  TREATMENT PLANT DATA

-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 76/05/04
  DATE   TIMF DEPTH N02&N03
  FROM    OF
   TO    DAY  FEET
74/10/12
74/11/10
74/12/15
75/02/09
75/03/08
75/04/13
75/05/10
75/05/31
75/06/14
75/06/29
75/07/10
75/07/28
75/08/10
75/09/13
08 40
13 ?5
09 35
10 19
15 04
08 49
14 43
16 10
15 02
14 10
20 10
16 40
12 55
12 55
                                                                  2005A1
                                                                 38 13 00.0 095 44 00.0  4
                                                                 20      coFFer co HWY  MP
                                                                 O/JOMN REDMOND RESERVOIR 100491
                                                                 BftuG ON US RT  75 1 HI  N OF  BURLINGTON
                                                                 11EPALES             2111204
                                                                  0000 FEET  DEPTH  CLASS 00
0630 00625
'&N03 TOT KJEL
OTAL N
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PHOS-DIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL ORTHO
IG/L MG/L MG/L
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.704 ]
.600 1
.720 ]
.640 ]
.875 1
.620 ]
1.500
1.000
1.900
1.800
1.800
1.550
.230 0.900
.315 2.080
.810 ]
.670 ]
1.250
1.000
.670 0.650
.610 0.700
.290 1
.610 ]
1.850
1.900
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0,
0,
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
,060
.125
,195
,120
.200
,084
,030
.125
,110
.032
,030
,025
.025
,065
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
p
055
060
080
024
060
100
020
040
070
100
065
040
025
040
MG/L
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
*
•
•
p
120
130
440
160
220
140
090
110
200
180
150
120
030
110

-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 76/05/04
                                                                  2005A2
                                                                 38 25 00.0 096 07 15.0 4
                                                                 NEOSMO RIVER
                                                                 20      LYON CO H*Y MAP
                                                                 T/JOHN REDMOND RESERVOIR 100492
                                                                 BROG ON US RT 50 2 MI £ OF EMPORIA
                                                                 11EPALES             2111204
                                                                  0000 FEET  DEPTH  CLASS 00
DATE
FROM
TO
74/10/12
74/11/23
74/12/03
75/01/11
75/02/08
75/03/08
75/04/12
75/05/18
75/05/28
75/06/16
75/06/29
75/07/12
75/07/28
75/08/09
75/09/14
00630 00625
TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TOTAL N
DAY FEET
11
12
16
14
13
11
14
14
14
12
10
13
16
11
11
10
00
10
30
45
45
00
45
15
30
05
45
20
30
40
MG/L
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
.056
.600
.736
.830
.850
.835
.440
.330
.250
.000
.900
.732
.065
.045
.200
MG/L
2.
1.
1.
3.
1.
2.
2.
4.
2.
1.
0.
3.
2.
1.
0.
500
100
300
300
400
300
200
600
200
550
950
000
600
075
800
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PhOS-DIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
230
045
025
432
048
080
035
085
105
015
035
195
020
110
025
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
P
035
060
065
065
048
060
065
035
085
070
075
055
035
020
065
MG/L P
0.140
0.130
0.100
0.380
0.200
0.420
0.170
0.120
0.320
0.270
0.260
0.200
0.200
0.155
0.190

-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/os/04
                                                                  2C0581
                                                                 38 11 30.0 095 51 55.0 4
                                                                 OTTES CREEK
                                                                 20      7.5 J REDMOND DM
                                                                 T/jOiN gEOMOf^p RESERVOIR 100491
                                                                 oRDG ON LGnT OTY RO b M N OF BURLINGTON
                                                                 11EPALES             2111204
                                                                  0000 FEET  DEPTH  CLASS 00
DATE
FROM
TO
74/10/13
74/11/10
74/12/15
75/01/12
75/03/08
75/04/13
75/05/10
75/05/31
75/06/14
75/06/29
75/07/10
75/07/28
75/08/10
75/09/13
00630 00625
TIME DEPTH N02&.N03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TOTAL N
DAY FEET
09
14
10
13
15
09
15
16
15
14
20
18
13
13
05
00
14
48
20
09
01
30
21
30
30
01
12
15
MG/L
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
.040
.690
.660
.940
.384
.185
.100
.720
.640
.220
.190
.115
.075
.970
MG/L
1.
1.
0.
3.
0.
1.
1.
1.
1.
0.
1.
0.
1.
1.
800
300
900
800
800
000
250
400
400
450
000
700
450
300
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PHOS-OIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
065
080
050
528
024
025
030
065
045
020
035
040
040
063
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
P MG/L P
025
030
015
016
008K
015
005
035
030
010
015
015
020
035
0.070
0.060
0.050
0.060
0.020
0.020
0.020
0.130
0.120
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.130
0.200
  K  VALUE KNOWN  TO  BE
  LESS  THAN INDICATED

-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 76/05/04
                                                                  2005C1
                                                                 38  16 00.0 096  10 30.0  4
                                                                 EAGLt CREEK
                                                                 20      LtON CO HWY MAP
                                                                 T/jOnN rtEOMONO  RESERVOIR  100492
                                                                 o«OG ON GRAVEL  RD 8 MI  E  OF"  OLPE
                                                                 11EPALES              2111204
                                                                  0000 FEET  DEPTH  CLASS  00
DATE
FROM
TO
74/10/13
74/11/10
74/12/15
75/01/12
75/02/09
75/03/08
75/04/13
75/05/10
75/05/31
75/06/14
75/06/29
75/07/28
75/08/10
75/09/13
00630 00625
TIMF DEPTH N02S.N03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TOTAL N
DAY FEET MG/L MG/L
09
14
10
15
11
15
09
15
16
13
15
18
13
13
25
55
48
08
01
43
32
26
50
45
10
20
35
35
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
.016 2.500
.980
.160
.920 «
.650
.825
.375
.000
.400
j.OOO
.200
.100
.650
.240 0.950
.600 2.000
.650 1.800
.520 4.400
.050 0.650
.015 1.100
.005 1.200
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PHOS-DIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L MG/L P MG/L P
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
040
065
050
280
128
048
025
030
075
065
085
020
020
020
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
085
070
060
080
056
028
020
025
065
055
025
025
030
025
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.150
.150
.170
.320
.170
.090
.100
.100
.250
.210
.090
.080
.150
.135

-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/05/04
  DATE   TIME DEPTH N02&N03
  FROM    OF
   TO    DAY  FEET
74/10/13
74/11/10
74/12/15
75/01/12
75/02/09
75/03/08
75/04/13
75/05/10
75/05/31
75/06/14
75/06/29
75/07/10
75/07/28
75/08/10
75/09/13
09 50
15 30
11 19
14 31
11 ?4
16 01
09 54
15 45
17 15
16 08
15 30
21 20
18 45
14 05
14 05
                                                                  2005D1
                                                                 38 22 00.0 096 07 00.0 4
                                                                 COTTONWOOD RIVER
                                                                 20      LYON CO HWY .MAP
                                                                 T/jOri,M REDMOND RESERVOIR  100491
                                                                 6RDO> ON GRAVEL RD 2.8 MI  S  JCT US  RT  50
                                                                 11EPALES             2111204
                                                                  0000 FEET  DEPTH  CLASS  00
0630
I&N03
OTAL
IG/L
0.368
0.840
0.552
0.464
0.930
0.875
0.860
0.780
1.950
1.200
1.300
0.980
0.075
0.300
1.720
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
5.500
1.900
1.900
5.000
2.200
2.200
2.050
1.500
3.200
2.300
1.850
1.350
1.950
3.750
3.800
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
1.720
0.670
0.730
0.910
0.588
0.384
0.230
0.400
0.095
0.110
C.145
0.250
0.550
0.360
1.100
00671
PHOS-OIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.175
0.125
0.070
0.080
0.112
0.140
0.174
0.125
0.100
0.115
0.135
0.120
0.190
0.300
0.210
00665
PHOS-TOT

MG/L P
0.770
0.250
0.140
0.190
0.310
0.200
0.380
0.240
0.730
0.580
0.520
0.290
0.320
0.480
0.540

-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 76/05/04
                                                                  2005E1
                                                                 38 24 30.0 096 03 30.0 4
                                                                 BADGES CREEK
                                                                 20      LrON CO H*Y MAP
                                                                 T/jOHN REDMOND RESERVOIR 100492
                                                                 0ROG ON US RT 50 6 MI E OF EMPORIA
                                                                 11EPALES             2111204
                                                                  0000 FEET  DEPTH  CLASS 00
DATE
FROM
TO
74/10/13
74/11/23
74/12/03
75/01/11
75/02/08
75/03/08
75/04/12
75/05/10
75/05/28
75/06/16
75/06/29
75/07/10
75/07/12
75/07/28
75/08/09
75/09/13
00630 00625
TIME DEPTH N02S.N03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TOTAL N
DAY FEET
11
11
16
14

11
13
15
13
12
13
20
14
16
11
14
25
45
25
40

25
30
00
45
45
00
52
25
00
15
20
MG/L
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
.040
.320
.160
.010
.060
.774
.350
.095
.880
.590
.000
.005
.035
.030
.010
.280
MG/L
1.
0.
1.
3.
1.
2.
1.
3.
2.
3.
2.
0.
2.
0.
2.
0.
500
900
500
400
300
700
350
700
600
150
000
950
300
875
000
500
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PHOS-DIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
030
030
020
304
112
088
030
085
110
046
115
065
040
040
155
085
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
P
035
030
015
105
040
060
015
020
085
030
050
020
010
022
CIO
005
MG/L P
0.190
0.130
0.060
0.420
0.140
0.420
0.100
0.100
0.390
0.220
0.245
0.140
0.090
0.120
0.130
0.040

-------
STO*ET RETRIEVAL OATt 76/05/04
                                                                   2005CA          P02005CA      P000463
                                                                  38  15  50.0  096  10  00.0  4
                                                                  OLPE
                                                                  20       LYON  COUNTY
                                                                  T/JOHN REDMOND  RES.       10 !"-92
                                                                  EAGLE  CREEK
                                                                  IIE^ALES             21412C-
                                                                   0000  FEET  DEPTH  CLASS 00
DATE
FROM
TO
75/02/10
75/03/13
75/04/08
75/04/28
75/05/19
75/06/09
75/07/01
75/07/21
75/08/11
75/09/02
75/09/22
75/10/14
75/11/03
TIME
OF
DAY
12 30
12 30
12 30
12 30
12 30
12 30
12 30
12 30
12 30
12 30
12 30
12 30
12 30
              FEET
00630
N02&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.080.
0.480
0.315
0.050
0.700
0.150
0.150
0.025
0.029
0.125
0.400
0.075
0.325
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
24.000
4.600
17.000
17.500
8.200
5.600
8.600
8.700
17.500
11.500
15.300
25.000
32.000
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
7.91C
2.500

5.700
0.210
0.210
0.130

0.700
0.690
0.710
3.700
5.700
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
5.900
3.700

6.200
2.300
3.200
4.700
3.600
6.600
5.200
6.350
9.600

00665
PHOS-TOT

MG/L P
6.600
3.900
5.600
6.700
2.800
4.300
5.100
5.000
8.500
6.100
11.000
11.000
12.900
50051 50053
FLO* CONDUIT
RATE FLOw-MGO
INST M'30 MONTHLY














-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE  7-i/03/04
  DATE
  FROM
   TO

75/02/12
75/03/13
75/04/17
75/05/12
75/06/04
75/06/30
75/07/22
75/08/05
75/09/10
75/09/24
75/10/06
75/11/03
75/12/10
TIME DEPTH
 OF
DAY  FEET

03 00
08 30
10 30
10 00
   00
   00
11 00
09 00
16 00
08 00
09 30
10 00
11
11
                                                                   20050A          P02005DA     P001076
                                                                  38 22 00.0 096 31 30.0 4
                                                                  COTTOiNaOOO FALLS
                                                                  20      CHASE COUNTY
                                                                  T/JOHN REDMOND RES.       100491
                                                                  COTTON*OOD RIVER
                                                                  11EPALES             2141204
                                                                   oooo FEET  DEPTH  CLASS oo
10 00
ilOC
1 -, -<0 3
". ~ - •_
'•'-• / L
C.320
C . 0 = i
0.--OG
C.05C
0.050
C.200
0 .025
0.028
0.075
0.050
0.150
0.025
0. 150
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
3.500

14.500
18.500
16.000
6.100
15.700
16.000
16.500
25.000
22.000
18.000
17.000
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.170
0.660
0.160
0.050K
0.050K
0.100
0.050K
0.025K
0.025K
0.025K
0.100K
0.125
0.400
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P

6.200
1.400
1.700
2.000
2.600
1.150
1.330
1.500
1.800
1.700
2.700
6.200
00665
PHOS-TOT

MG/L P
6.100
7.200
4.500
3.700
4.400
3.200
1.200
2.600
3.000
4.200
4.100
4.100
11.000
50051
FLOW
RATE
INST MOD
0.100

0.100
0.100
0.100








50053
CONDUIT
FLOrt-MGD
MONTHLY
0.100
0.100
0.100

0.100








  K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
  LESS THAN  INDICATED

-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 76/05/04
  DATE   TIME DEPTH N02&N03
  FROM    OF
   TO    OAY  FEET
75/04/30
75/06/04
75/06/30
75/08/01
75/09/30
75/10/30
76/01/02
76/03/26
76/03/29
08 30
08 00
07 40
13 00
10 30
08 00
08 00
09 30
08 00
                                                                  200506          TF200SOB     P000626
                                                                 38 23 30.0 096 33 00.0 4
                                                                 STRONG CITY
                                                                 20      7.5 STRONG CITY
                                                                 T/JOriN REDMOND RES.      100491
                                                                 COTTONnOOO RIVER
                                                                 11EPALES             2141204
                                                                  0000 FEET  DEPTH  CLASS 00
0630
'&N03
OTAL
IG/L
0.050
0.500
1.100
2.200
2.880
0.100
0.040


00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
20.000
31.000
5.900
46.000
27.000
41.000
38.000


00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
2.700
4.650
0.087
18.000
9.700
26.000
25.000


00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTMO
MG/L P

5.350
2.880
1.650
5.900
12.000
5.100


00665
PHOS-TOT

MG/L P
6.450
8.300
3.800
13.000
13.000
16.300
14.000


50051
FLOW
RATE
INST MOD
0.031
0.072
0.080
0.080
0.060
0.060
0.550
0.060
0.054
50053
CONDUIT
FLO«-MGO
MONTHLY
0.081
0.070
0.080
0.070
0.060
0.060
0.045
0.060
0.054

-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 76/05/0*
                      00630     00625
  DATE   TIME DEPTH N02&N03   TOT KJEL
  FROM    OF        N-TOTAL      N
   TO    DAY  FEET    MG/L      MG/L
75/03/02 12 00
CP(T)-
75/03/03 12 00
75/04/02 12 00
CP(T)-
75/04/02 12 00
75/05/16 01 00
CP(T>-
75/05/16 24 00
75/05/20 24 00
CP(T)-
75/05/21 24 00
75/06/06 24 00
CP(T>-
75/06/07 24 00
75/07/08 12 00
CP(T)-
75/07/09 12 00
75/07/25 24 00
CPIT)-
75/07/26 24 00
75/08/10 24 00
CP(T)-
75/08/11 24 00
75/09/10 12 00
CP(T>-
75/09/11 12 00
75/10/02 12 00
CP(T)-
75/10/03 12 00
75/10/21 24 00
75/11/23 12 00
CP(T)-
75/11/23 24 00
                         2005DC          TF2005DC     P023879*
                        38 23 00.0 096 10 00.0 4

                        20      7.5 EMPORIA
                        T/joi-iN REDMOND RES.      100*91
                        COTTONWOOD RIVER
                        11EPALES             2141204
                         0000 FEET  DEPTH  CLASS 00

 00610     00671     00665     50051     50053
NH3-N    PHOS-DIS  PHOS-TOT    FLOW    CONDUIT
TOTAL     ORTHO                RATE    FLOW-MGO
 MG/L     MG/L P    MG/L P   INST MGD  MONTHLY
0.080
0.345
0.200
0.100
1.000
0.300
2.300
3.100
0.025
0.425
O.OSC
3.600
26.000
42.000
27.000
21.000
23.000
25.000
14.500
13.000
23.000
22.000
16.000
24.000
10.800
20.090
14.500
14.500
10.500
6.000
9.800
2.800
10.500
7.900
8.000
14.500
7.600
3.130
7.400
7.020
7.300
7.700
7.900
9.100
7.900
8.500
9.400
7.900
10.500
13.000
7.700
7.300
8.600
8.800
8.800
9.300
8.500
9.600
9.600
8.600
4.300
8.800
7.600
6.500
8.300
6.500
5.000
4.600
6.600
5.900
6.300
2.400
4.800
4.800
7.100
7.000
8.100
6.300
5.500
5.600
6.000
5.200
5.600
2.600

-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/05/04
                                                                  2005XA          P02005XA      P000921
                                                                 38 24 30.0 095 52 00.0 4
                                                                 LEBO
                                                                 20      7.5 LEBO
                                                                 f/JOriN REDMOND RES       091492
                                                                 LEriO WEEK
                                                                 11EPALES             2141204
                                                                  0000 FEET  DEPTH  CLASS 00
  DATE   TIME DEPTH
  FROM    OF
   TO    DAY  FEET

75/02/25 16 00
75/03/18 14 00
75/04/29 10 00
75/05/19 10 00
75/06/10 10 30
75/07/02
75/07/22
75/08/11 11 00
75/09/03
75/09/25
75/10/24 09 00
75/11/12 00 00
75/12/02 00 00
00630
N02&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.300
0.400
0.450
0.050
0.100
0.050
0.100
0.075
0.050
0.050
0.050
0.825
1.100
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
17.500
3.700
14.000
9.000
10.000
9.400
10.500
11.000
12.000
14.000
13.000
12.000
11.000
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
1.950
1.360
0.770
0.057
0.050K
0.069
0.050K
0.025K
0.025K
0.025K
0.080
0.044
0.100
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
10.500
9.300
4.000
2.300
4.000
1.850
1.500
2.300
2.000
2.800
4.300
6.000
6.575
00665
PHOS-TOT

MG/L P
12.000
10.000
4.700
3.000
5.900
3.000
2.500
3.400
3.200
4.200
5.000
7.200
9.600
50051
FLO*
RATE
INST MGD
0.001

0.768










50053
CONDUIT
FLOrt-MGD
MONTHLY













 K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
 LESS THAN INDICATED

-------
5TORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/05/04
                                                                  200521           P0200521      P000539
                                                                 38  18  00.0  095  57 15.0  4
                                                                 HARTFORD
                                                                 20      LYON  COUNTY
                                                                 D/JOHN REDMOND  RES        100491
                                                                 JOHN REDMOND  RES
                                                                 11EPALES              2141204
                                                                  0000  FEET  DEPTH CLASS  00
DATE
FROM
TO
75/01/07
75/02/07
75/03/06
75/04/05
75/05/06
75/06/03
75/07/07
75/08/07
75/09/02
75/10/06
75/11/02
75/12/01
76/01/06
00630
TIME DEPTH N02&N03
OF N-TOTAL
DAY FEET
14

10
09
10
10
13
10
15
12
10
14
09
00

30
30
00
00
00
00
30
00
00
00
00
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
480
080
080
551
050
150
100
050
025
100
100
275
350
00425
TOT «JEL
N
MG/
27.
23.
24.
19.
18.
8.
22.
19.
16.
21.
20.
11.
16.
00610 00671 00665 50051 50053
NH3-N PHOS-DIS PHOS-TOT FLOW CONDUIT
TOTAL ORTHO RATE FLOw-MGD
MG/L
500
300
500
000
500
300
;00
500
500
700
)00
000
•>00
8
8
5
0
2
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
.200
.900
.400
.227
.200
.081
.250
.310
.700
.280
.100
.160
.110
MG/L
2.
5.
3.
4.
2.
3.
1.
4.
6.
2.
2.
3.
2.
P
700
700
100
160
400
400
200
600
100
800
800
050
700
MG/L P INST MGD MONTHLY
5.500
8.350
8.600
6.000
9.000
6.800
6.900
7.300
8.200
9.000
9.800
4.800
5.500 0.594 0.544

-------