-------
MARION RESERVOIR
STORE! NO. 2007
I. CONCLUSIONS
A. Trophic Condition:
Survey data indicate that Marion Reservoir is eutrophic. It
ranked third in overall trophic quality when the 15 Kansas reser-
voirs sampled in 1974 were compared using a combination of six
water quality parameters*. Five of the reservoirs had less median
total phosphorus, four had less median dissolved orthophosphorus,
five had less median inorganic nitrogen, ten had less mean chloro-
phyll a_, and eight had greater mean Secchi disc transparency.
Survey limnologists did not observe macrophytes or surface
concentrations of algae.
B. Rate-Limiting Nutrient:
!he algal assay results indicate that Marion Reservoir was
phosphorus limited at the time the sample was taken (04/12/74).
The reservoir data indicate phosphorus limitation at all sampling
times.
C. Nutrient Controllability:
1. Point sources—The only known point source contributing
phosphorus to Marion Reservoir was the municipal wastewater treat-
ment facility at Canton. It is estimated that this plant contributed
about 9.5% of the load during the sampling year. However, the
phosphorus export rate of North Cottonwood River at station A-2
* See Appendix A.
-------
(22 kg/km2/yr) may be indicative of an underestimation of the
phosphorus load from Canton or unknown phosphorus sources in
that drainage basin.
The present phosphorus loading of 0.41 g/m 2/year is about
1.6 times that proposed by Vollenweider (Vollenweider and Dillon,
1974) as a eutrophic loading (see page 13). Because the reser-
voir is phosphorus limited, minimization of phosphorus loads to
the greatest practicable extent may slow the rate of eutrophication
in the reservoir, particularly if a major portion of the North
Cottonwood River phosphorus export proves to be controllable.
2. Non-point sources—Non-point sources contributed about
90.5% of the total phosphorus load during the sampling year. The
North Cottonwood River contributed 46.1%, and ungaged minor tribu-
taries and immediate drainage contributed an estimated 40.1%. As
noted above, improvement in water quality of the reservoir would
be possible if a substantial reduction in the North Cottonwood
River phosphorus load can be accomplished.
-------
II. RESERVOIR AND DRAINAGE BASIN CHARACTERISTICS1"
A. Morphometry :
1. Surface area: 24.93 kilometers2.
2. Mean depth: 4.1 meters.
3. Maximum depth: 10.1 meters.
4. Volume: 102.213 x 106 m3.
5. Mean hydraulic retention time: 2.4 years (based on outflow),
B. Tributary and Outlet:
(See Appendix C for flow data)
1. Tributaries -
Drainage Mean flow
Name area (ion2)* (m3/sec)*
North Cottonwood River 246.6 0.85
Minor tributaries &
immediate drainage - 246.5 1.46
Totals 493.1 2.31
2. Outlet -
North Cottonwood River 518.0** 1.33
C. Precipitation***:
1. Year of sampling: 80.8 centimeters.
2. Mean annual: 82.2 centimeters.
t Table of metric conversions—Appendix B.
tt Stoltenberg, 1975.
* For limits of accuracy, see Working Paper No. 175, "...Survey Methods,
1973-1976".
** Includes area of reservoir.
*** See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
III. WATER QUALITY SUMMARY
Marion Reservoir was sampled three times during the open-water season
of 1974 by means of a pontoon-equipped Huey helicopter. Each time,
samples for physical and chemical parameters were collected from two or
more depths at two stations on the reservoir (see map, page v). During
each visit, a single depth-integrated (4.6 m or near bottom to surface)
sample was composited from the stations for phytoplankton identification
and enumeration; and during the first visit, a single 18.9-liter depth-
integrated sample was composited for algal assays. Also each time, a
depth-integrated sample was collected from each of the stations for
chlorophyll ji analysis. The maximum depths sampled were 9.1 meters at
station 1 and 3.0 meters at station 2.
The sampling results are presented in full in Appendix D and are
summarized in the following table.
-------
PARAMETER
TEMP to
OISS OXY (MG/L>
CNOCTVY (MCKOMO)
PH (STAND UNITS)
TOT ALK (MG/L)
TOT P (MCi/L)
ORTHO P (MG/L)
N02»N03 (MG/L)
AMMONIA (MG/L)
KJEL N (MG/L)
INORG N (MG/L)
TOTAL N (MG/L)
CHLRPYL A (UG/L)
SECCril (METERS)
A. SUMMARY OF PHYSICAL AND
1ST SAMPLING ( 4/12/74)
2 SITES
RANGE
11.0 - 12.0
10.0 - 10.2
397. - 421.
8.1 - 8.3
140. - 191.
0.063 - 0.137
0.005 - 0.011
0.310 - 0.600
0.030 - 0.080
CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS
STORET COJE 2007
MARIUN
405.
8.3
143.
MEAN MEDIAN
11.4 11.0
10.1 10.0
409.
8.3
150.
0.090 0.086
0.007 0.006
0.383 0.350
0.053 0.050
0.700 - 1.000 0.786 0.800
0.3bO - 0.640 0.436 0.400
1.030 - 1.400 1.169 1.110
18.0 - 21.5 19.8 19.8
0.3 - 0.3 0.3 0.3
22.4 - 23.3
6.0 - 7.<»
474. - 488.
8.3 - 6.4
116. - 129.
0.046 - 0.088
2ND SAMPLING ( 6/27/74)
2 SITES
MEAN MEDIAN
22.8
6.7
480.
8.3
123.
0.063
22.5
6.7
475.
8.3
123.
0.052
0.021 - 0.026 0.023 0.022
1.020 - 1.180 1.134 1.150
0.050 - 0.110
0.400 - 0.700
1.110 - 1.290
1.520 - 1.850
1.2 - 2.0
0.080 0.085
0.537 0.550
1.214 1.225
1.671 1.645
3RD SAMPLING (10/ 2/74)
2 SITES
0.3 -
O.b
1.6
0.4
1.6
0.4
RANGE
15.1 - 15.5
8.4 - 9.8
428. - 440.
8.4 - 8.6
124. - 129.
0.020 - 0.050
0.007 - 0.010
0.050 - 0.230
0.020 - 0.080
0.300 - 0.500
0.070 - 0.300
0.520 - 0.580
7.7 - 24.0
0.5 - 0.8
MEAN
15.3
9.0
433.
8.5
126.
0.029
0.008
0.172
0.053
0.367
0.225
0.538
15.8
0.6
MEDIAN
15.4
8.8
432.
8.4
126.
0.021
0.008
0.22U
0.050
0.300
0.275
0.530
15.8
0.6
-------
B. Biological Characteristics:
1. Phytoplankton -
Sampling
Date
04/12/74
06/27/74
10/02/74
Dominant
Genera
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Cyclotella sp.
Melosira sp.
Stephanodiscus sp.
Synedra sp.
Crucigenia sp.
Other genera
Total
Stephanodiscus sp.
Melosira sp.
Chroomonas sp.
Cryptomonas sp.
Oocystis sp.
Other genera
Total
Carteria sp.
Chroomonas sp.
Nitzschia sp.
Stephanodiscus sp.
Cryptomonas sp.
Other genera
Algal Units
per ml
30,
6,
1,
718
211
310
211
169
297
38,916
308
308
166
142
95
120
1,137
660
616
572
484
440
1,455
Total
4,227
-------
2. Chlorophyll
Sampling
Date
04/12/74
06/27/74
10/02/74
Station
Number
1
2
1
2
1
2
Chlorophyll
(yg/D
21.5
18.0
1.2
2.0
7.7
24.0
C. Limiting Nutrient Study:
1. Autoclaved, filtered, and nutrient spiked -
Ortho P
Cone, (mg/1)
Inorganic N Maximum yield
Cone, (mg/1) (mg/1-dry wt.)
0.005
0.055
0.055
0.005
0.242
0.242
1.242
1.242
5.8
8.3
18.6
5.6
Spike (mg/1)
Control
0.050 P
0.050 P + 1.0
1.0 N
2. Discussion -
The control yield of the assay alga, Selenastrum capri-
cornutum, indicates that the potential primary productivity
of Marion Reservoir was high at the time the sample was col-
lected (04/12/74). Also, the significant increase in yield
with the addition of phosphorus alone indicates that the
reservoir was phosphorus limited at that time. Note that
the addition of only nitrogen resulted in a yield essentially
the same as that of the control.
-------
8
The reservoir data indicate phosphorus limitation as well.
The mean inorganic nitrogen/orthophosphorus ratios were 16/1
or greater at all sampling stations and times, and phosphorus
limitation would be expected.
-------
IV. NUTRIENT LOADINGS
(See Appendix E for data)
For the determination of nutrient loadings, the Kansas National
Guard collected monthly near-surface grab samples from each of the
tributary sites indicated on the map (page v), except for the high
runoff month of June when three samples were collected at most of the
sites. Sampling was begun in October, 1974, and was completed in
September, 1975.
Through an interagency agreement, stream flow estimates for the
year of sampling and a "normalized" or average year were provided by
the Kansas District Office of the U.S. Geological Survey for the
tributary sites nearest the reservoir.
In this report, nutrient loads for sampled tributaries were
calculated using mean annual concentrations and mean annual flows.
Nutrient loads shown are those measured minus point-source loads,
if any.
Nutrient loads for unsampled "minor tributaries and immediate
drainage" ("ZZ" of U.S.G.S.) were estimated using the mean concentrations
in Silver Creek at station C-l and the mean annual ZZ flow.
The operator of the Canton wastewater treatment plant provided
monthly effluent samples; however, corresponding flow data were not
available. Therefore, nutrient loads were estimated at 1.134 kg P
and 3.401 kg N/capita/year, and flows were estimated at 0.3785 m3/capita/
day.
-------
10
A. Waste Sources:
1. Known municipal* -
Pop. Mean Flow Receiving
Name Served Treatment (m3/d) Mater
Canton 854 tr. filter 323.2 North Cotton-
wood River
2. Known industrial - None
* Treatment plant questionnaire.
-------
11
B. Annual Total Phosphorus Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
kg P/ % of
Source yr total
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
N. Cottonwood River 4,715 46.1
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non-point load) - 4,100 40.1
c. Known municipal STP's -
Canton 970 9.5
d. Septic tanks - Unknown ?
e. Known industrial - None
f. Direct precipitation* - 435 4.3
Total 10,220 100.0
2. Outputs -
Reservoir outlet - N. Cottonwood River 2,850
3. Net annual P accumulation - 7,370 kg.
* See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
12
C. Annual Total Nitrogen Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
Source
kg N/
yr
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
N. Cottonwood River 64,055
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non-point load) - 65,750
c. Known municipal STP's -
Canton 2,905
d. Septic tanks - Unknown ?
e. Known industrial - None
f. Direct precipitation* - 26,915
Total 159,625
2. Outputs -
Reservoir outlet - N. Cottonwood River 52,510
3. Net annual N accumulation - 107,115 kg.
D. Non-point Nutrient Export by Subdrainage Area:
Tributary kg P/km2/yr
N. Cottonwood River 22
E. Mean Nutrient Concentrations in Ungaged Streams:
Tributary
French Creek
Silver River
Perry River
Mean Total P
Cone, (mg/1)
0.164
0.089
0.162
% of
total
40.1
41.2
1.8
16.9
100.0
kg N/km2/yr
260
Mean Total N
Cone, (mg/1)
2.250
1.428
1.829
* See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
13
F. Yearly Loads:
In the following table, the existing phosphorus loadings
are compared to those proposed by Vollenweider (Vollenweider
and Dillon, 1974). Essentially, his "dangerous" loading is
one at which the receiving water would become eutrophic or
remain eutrophic; his "permissible" loading is that which
would result in the receiving water remaining oligotrophic
or becoming oligotrophic if morphometry permitted. A meso-
trophic loading would be considered one between "dangerous"
and "permissible".
Note that Vollenweider's model may not be applicable to
water bodies with short hydraulic retention times.
Total Phosphorus Total Nitrogen
Total Accumulated Total Accumulated
grams/m2/yr 0.41 0.30 6.4 4.3
Vollenweider phosphorus loadings
(g/m2/yr) based on mean depth and mean
hydraulic retention time of Marion Reservoir:
"Dangerous" (eutrophic loading) 0.26
"Permissible" (oligotrophic loading) 0.13
-------
14
V. LITERATURE REVIEWED
Prophet, Carl W., Joy E. Prather, and N. Leon Edwards, 1970. Com-
parison of summer water quality features in three Grand River
reservoirs, Kansas. Emporia St. Res. Studies, vol. XVIII (4),
KS St. Teachers Coll., Emporia.
Stoltenberg, Gerald A., 1975. Personal communication (reservoir
morphometry). KS Dept. of Health & Environment, Topeka.
Vollenweider, R. A., and P. J. Dillon, 1974. The application of
the phosphorus loading concept to eutrophication research.
Natl. Res. Council of Canada Publ. No. 13690, Canada Centre
for Inland Waters, Burlington, Ontario.
-------
15
VI. APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
LAKE RANKINGS
-------
LAKE
LAKE
'CODE
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
'LAKE NAME
CEDAR BLUF
COUNCIL GROVE
ELK CITY
FALL RIVER
JOHN REDMC
KANOPOLIS
MARION RESERVOIR
MELVERN RESERVOI
MILFORD RESERVOI
NORTON RESERVOIR
PERRY RESERVOIR
POMONA RESERVOIR
TORONTO RESERVOI
TUTTLE CREEK RES
WILSON RESERVOIR
ID IN RANKINGS
MEDIAN
TOTAL P
iESERVOIR 0.017
I 0.069
0.030
ISERVOIR 0.053
RESERVOIR 0.118
5ERVOIR 0.056
'OIR - 0.052
WOIR 0.034
?VOIR 0.079
I01R 0.122
)IR 0.055
/OIR . 0.040
?VOIR 0.067
RESERVOIR 0.162
/OIR 0.023
MEDIAN
INORG N
0.055
0.830
0.590
0.470
1.250
0.640
0.430
0.265
0.710
0.110
0.970
1.240
0.425
0.970
0.265
500-
MEA'Kl SEC
431.667
485.889
490.400
488.667
492.667
487.000
483.667
459.111
466.333
476.750
478.571
481.333
488.500
470.667
445.222
MEAN
CHLORA
4.217
9.789
3.212
7.683
9.467
16.033
12.400
30.400
18.883
21.360
5.614
8.312
6.583
11.278
8.867
15-
MIN DO
10.800
10.400
14.000
9.200
8.200
10.200
9.000
14.400
12.300
8.000
13.400
13.000
13.000
13.600
13.400
MEDIAN
DISS ORTHO P
0.004
0.028
0.003
0.016
. 0.066
0.011
0.010
0.007
0.036
0.036
0.017
0.021
0.011
0.067
0.004
-------
LAKES RANKED BY INDEX NOS.
SAMK LAKE CODE LAKE NAME INDEX NO
1 2001 CEDAR BLUFF RESERVOIR 539
2 2015 WILSON RESERVOIR 439
3 2007 MARION RESERVOIR 357
4 2003 ELK CITY 350
5 2004 FALL RIVER RESERVOIR 328
6 2008 MELVERN RESERVOIR 326
7 2013 TORONTO RESERVOIR " 303
8 2010 NORTON RESERVOIR 292
9 2011 PERRY RESERVOIR 279
10 2006 KANOPOLIS RESERVOIR 271
11 2012 POMONA RESERVOIR 267
12 2002 COUNCIL GROVE 230
13 2009 MILFORD RESERVOIR 214
14 2005 JOHN REDMOND RESERVOIR 164
15 2014 TUTTLE CREEK RESERVOIR 139
-------
PERCENT OF LAKES WITH HIGHER VALUES (NUMBER OF LAKES WITH HIGHER VALUES)
LAKE
CO£E LAKE NA.ME
2001 CEDAR BLUFF RESERVOIR
2002 COUNCIL GROVE
2003 ELK CITY
2004 FALL RIVER RESERVOIR
2005 JOHN REDMOND RESERVOIR
2006 KANOPOLIS RESERVOIR
2007 MARION RESERVOIR
200ft MELVERN RESERVOIR
2009 MILFORO RESERVOIR
2010 NORTON RESERVOIR
2011 PERRY RESERVOIR
2012 POMONA RESERVOIR
2013 TORONTO RESERVOIR
2014 TUTTLE CREEK RESERVOIR
2015 WILSON RESERVOIR
MEDIAN
TOTAL P.
100 (
29 (
86 (
57 <
14 1
43 <
64 (
79 (
21 (
7 (
50 (
71 1
36 1
0 1
93 1
i 14)
: 4)
: 12)
! 8)
: 2)
: 6)
; 9)
: ID
: 3).
: i)
: 7)
[ 10)
: 5)
1 0>
1 13)
MEDIAN
INORG N.
100 (
29 (
50 (
57 (
0 1
43 (
64 1
82 <
36 1
93 (
18 1
7 1
71 (
18 (
82 1
I 14)
: 4)
: 7)
: 8)
: o)
: 6>
: 9)
: ID
I 5)
: 13)
: 2)
[ i)
t 10)
I 2)
: ID
500-
MEAN SEC
100 (
36 <
7 1
14 (
0 1
29 1
43 1
86 1
79 1
64 (
57 1
50 l
21 i
71 1
93 (
: K)
: 5)
: i)
: 2)
: o)
: 4)
! 6)
I 12)
[ 11)
: 9)
[ 8)
I 7)
E 3)
( 10)
[ 13)
MEAN
CHLORA
93 1
43 (
100 4
71 (
50 (
21 (
29 (
0 1
14 1
7 (
86 1
64 1
79 1
36 (
57 1
I 13)
[ 6)
! 14)
: 10)
; 7)
: 3)
; 4)
; 0)
; 2)
: i)
; 12)
I 9)
[ 11)
! 5)
; 8)
15-
MJN DO
57 (
64 {
7 (
79 (
93 (
71 (
66 (
0 (
50 (
100 (
25 (
39 (
39 (
14 (
25 (
8)
9)
1)
11)
13)
10)
12)
0)
7)
14)
3)
5)
5)
2)
3)
MEDIAN
DISS ORTHO P
89 (
29 (
100 (
50 (
7 (
64 (
71 (
79 (
14 (
21 <
43 (
36 (
57 (
0 <
89 (
12)
4)
14)
7)
1)
9)
10)
11)
2)
3)
6)
5)
8)
0)
12)
INDEX
NO
539
230
350
328
164
271
357
326
214
292
279
267
303
139
439
-------
APPENDIX B
CONVERSION FACTORS
-------
CONVERSION FACTORS
Hectares x 2.471 = acres
Kilometers x 0.6214 = miles
Meters x 3.281 = feet
Cubic meters x 8.107 x 10"4 = acre/feet
Square kilometers x 0.3861 = square miles
Cubic meters/sec x 35.315 = cubic feet/sec
Centimeters x 0.3937 = inches
«
Kilograms x 2.205 = pounds
Kilograms/square kilometer x 5.711 = Ibs/square mile
-------
APPENDIX C
TRIBUTARY FLOW DATA
-------
TRIBUTARY FLO* INFORMATION FOR KANSAS
LAKE CODE 2007 MARION
TOTAL DRAINAGE ArtEA OF LAKE'SQ KM) 518.0
05/03/76
SUQ-DSAINAGE
TRIBUTARY AREAfSQ K'-1)
2007A1
2007A2
2007ZZ
516.0
2*6.6
271.4
JAN
0.71
0.37
0.57
TEB
0.74
0.48
0.76
MAR
1.73
1.08
1.50
APR
1.64
1.10
1.70
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA OF LAKE =
SUM OF SUB-DRAINAGE AREAS =
MAY
2.07
1.50
2.61
518.0
518.0
'NORMALIZED FLO'WSCCM'SI
JUN JUL AUG
2.35
1.59
2.69
1.87
1.53
2.41
0.57
0.51
1.33
SEP
1.33
0.62
1.42
OCT
1.19
0.68
1.27
NOV
1.10
0.37
0.68
DEC
0.68
0.37
0.59
MEAN
1.33
0.85
1.46
SUMMARY
TOTAL FLOW IN
TOTAL FLOW OUT
27.72
15.97
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS(CMS)
TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAR
2007A1
2007A2
2007ZZ
MEAN FLOW DAY
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
74
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
74
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
74
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
FLOW DAY
FLOW DAY
FLOW
0.181
0.784
0.309
1.085
1.860
1.83?
1.985
0.631
3.936
5.663
0.170
0.221
0.878
0.538
0.453
0.481
1.501
1.303
0.227
0.850
6.230
0.680
0.453
0.119
0.266
0.963
0.736
0.708
2.379
1.841
1.671
1.472
10.194
1.048
1.218
0.266
13
10
15
12
9
13
4
15
13
30
14
13
10
15
12
9
13
4
15
13
30
14
0.212
0.173
0.198
0.221
0.736
2.407
0.906
5.918
0.736
0.161
0.212
26.901
1.104
0.283
0.708
0.425
0.481
0.765
0.283
0.062
1.472
0.085
16
27
18
27
0.621
0.311
0.227
1.444
29
1.133
-------
APPENDIX D
PHYSICAL and CHEMICAL DATA
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 76/05/03
200701
38 22 27.0 097 04 45.0 4
MARION RESERVOIR
20115 KANSAS
10049}
11EPALES 2111202
0035 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
DATE
FROM
TO
74/04/12
74/06/27
74/10/02
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
15 00 0000
15 00 0005
15 00 0015
15 00 0030
09 55 0000
09 55 0005
09 55 0010
09 55 0020
09 55 0025
10 00 0000
10 00 0005
10 00 0015
10 00 0030
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
11.0
11.0
11.0
11.0
22.5
22.5
22.5
22.5
22.4
15.5
15.5
15.5
15.4
00300
DO
MG/L
10.0
10.2
10.2
7.4
6.6
6.6
6.4
6.0
8.6
8.8
8.4
8.8
00077
TRANSP
SECCHI
INCHES
10
20
30
00094
CNDUCTVY
FIELD
MICROMHO
405
397
398
402
475
475
474
475
474
440
438
432
432
00400
PH
SU
8.35
8.35
8.30
8.15
8.30
8.30
8.40
8.30
8.30
8.42
8.40
8.42
8.38
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
143
143
142
191
119
122
116
129
122
129
126
126
125
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.040
Oo030
0.050
0.040
0.090
OoOSO
0.070
0.080
0.060
0.050
0.050
0.050
0.080
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.700
0.700
0.700
0.800
0.600
0.500
0.400
0.500
0.400
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
00630
N02&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.360
0.330
0.350
0.600
1.020
1.130
1.120
1.160
1.150
0.220
0.230
0.230
0.220
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.011
0.005
0.005
0.010
0.026
0.022
0.022
0.021
0.021
0.009
0.010
0.010
0.008
DATE
FROM
TO
74/04/12
74/06/27
74/10/02
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
15 00 0000
15 00 0005
15 00 0015
15 00 0030
09 55 0000
09 55 0002
09 55 0005
09 55 0010
09 55 0020
09 55 0025
10 00 0000
10 00 0005
10 00 0015
10 00 0030
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.087
0.070
0.137
0.086
0.052
0.050
0.050
0.046
0.052
0.022
0.020
0.020
0.020
32217 00031
CHLRPHYL INCDT LT
A REMNING
UG/L PERCENT
21.5
1.2
50.0
1.0
7.7
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/05/03
200702
38 24 30.0 097 07 40.0 4
MARION RESERVOIR
20115 KANSAS
100491
DATE
FROM
TO
74/04/12
74/06/27
74/10/02
DATE
FROM
TO
74/04/12
74/06/27
74/10/02
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
15 20 0000
15 20 0005
15 20 0010
10 35 0000
10 35 0005
10 35 0010
09 40 0000
09 40 0005
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
15 20 0000
15 20 0005
15 20 0010
10 35 0000
10 35 0002
10 35 0005
10 35 0010
09 40 0000
09 40 0002
09 40 0005
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
12.0
11.9
11.9
23.3
23.3
23.3
15.1
15.1
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.105
0.063
0.081
0.079
0.088
0.084
0.050
0.044
HEPALES 2111202
0015 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00300 00077 00094 00400 00410 00610 00625 00630 00671
DO TRANSP CNDUCTVY PH T ALK NH3-N TOT KJEL N02fcN03 PHOS-DIS
SECCHI FIELD CAC03 TOTAL N N-TOTAL ORTMO
MG/L INCHES MICROMHO SU MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P
10
10.0
10.0
6.8 10
7.0
7.0
9.8 18
9.8
32217 00031
CHLRPHYL INCDT LT
A REMNING
UG/L PERCENT
18.0
2.0
1.0
24.0
1.0
421 8.30 "146 0.080 1.000 0.350 0.007
420 8.30 144 0.060 0.800 0.310 0.006
*20 8.30 140 0.070 0.800 0.380 0.006
488 8.40 126 0.090 0.700 1.150 0.022
*88 8.40 124 0.090 0.600 1.160 0.024
*88 8.40 124 0.110 0.600 1.180 0.023
428 8.60 124 0.070 0.500 0.080 0.007
429 8.60 125 0.020 0.500 0.050 0.007
-------
APPENDIX E
TRIBUTARY AND WASTEWATER
TREATMENT PLANT DATA
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/05/04
2007A1
38 21 55.0 097 04 40
N COTTONrfOOD RIVER
20 7.5 MARION
0/MARION RESERVOIp
SEC' RD BRDG .4 MI
11EPALES
,0 4
100491
iE OF MARION 0AM
2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
DATE
FROM
TO
74/10/13
74/11/10
74/12/15
75/01/12
75/04/13
75/OS/0<»
75/06/15
75/06/18
75/06/27
75/07/13
75/08/30
75/09/14
TIME 1
OF
DAY 1
10 36
10 16
10 15
11 20
12 30
10 00
11 10
10 05
15 00
13 45
09 00
11 00
FEET
00630
N02&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.200
0.196
0.096
0.112
0.045
0.035
0.115
0.055
0.250
0.080
0.330
0.160
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
1.000
1.200
0.400
2.300
0.600
2.600
1.500
0.750
0.550
0.650
1.150
0.650
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.270
0.060
0.015
0.152
0.025
0.120
0.065
0.135
0.015
0.005K
0.030
0.037
00671
PHOS-OIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.030
0.030
0.010
0.024
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.025
0.025
0.010
0.055
0.025
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.065
0.070
0.030
0.06C
0.040
0.060
0.060
0.070
0.080
0.060
0.120
0.105
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STOSET RETRIEVAL DATE T~<'.-.- ;<*
DATE TIME DEPTH N02i>'.'. ;
FROM OF
TO DAY FEET
74/10/13
74/11/10
74/12/15
75/01/12
75/04/13
75/05/04
75/06/18
75/06/27
75/06/29
75/07/13
75/08/30
75/09/14
11
11
11
13
13
11
11
11
15
10
14
12
11
50
30
00
00
25
15
00
45
40
45
30
10
45
2007A2
38 29 08.0 097 13 50.0 t
N COTTONWOOD RIVER
20 7.5 DURHAM
T/MA^ION RESERVOIR 100491
SEC KU BftOG AT W EDGE OF DURHAM
11EPALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
o
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/05/04
2007B1
38 22 45.0 0*7 12 20.0 4
FRENCH CREEK
20 7.5 DURHAM
T/M6RION RESERVOIR
SEC RO 8RUG 8 MIS
11EFALES
0000 FEET DEPTn
100^.91
OF DURHAM
2111204
CLASS 00
DATE
FROM
TO
74/10/13
74/11/10
74/12/15
75/01/12
75/04/13
75/05/04
75/06/15
75/06/18
75/06/29
75/07/13
75/08/30
75/09/14
00630 00625
TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TOTAL N
DAY FEET
11
10
10
11
12
10
11
10
11
14
11
11
12
45
30
40
55
30
30
35
20
00
30
?0
MG/L
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
.464
.280
.552
.600
.280
.520
.200
.780
.900
.250
.210
.470
MG/L
0.
1.
0.
7.
1.
1.
1.
0.
1.
0.
1.
0.
600
200
500
800
050
650
400
900
350
550
000
500
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PHOS-DIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.110
.100
.035
.660
.125
.500
.065
.125
.070
.020
.070
.050
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
P
045
020
005
136
110
050
105
005K
065
010
015
005
MG/L P
0.045
0.110
0.040
0.690
0.160
0.140
0.240
0.100
0.200
0.050
0.150
0.040
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 7^/05/04
DATE TIME DEPTH N02&N03
FROM OF
TO DAY FEET
74/10/13 11 30
74/11/10 11 00
74/12/15 10 15
75/04/13 13 04
75/05/04 10 45
75/06/18 10 43
75/06/29 13 30
75/07/13 14 15
75/09/14 11 30
2007C1
38 2d 05.0 097 12 20.0 4
SILVER CREEK
20 7.5 DURHAM
T/NURION RESERVOIR 100491
SEC RD 8RDG 4.1 MI SSE OF DURHAM
11EPALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
0630
I&N03
OTAL
IG/L
0.240
0.504
0.464
0.270
0.290
0.260
0.690
0.260
0.220
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
2.300
1.100
0.500
1.450
1.600
0.600
1.200
0.4QO
0.500
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.065
0.210
0.050
0.120
O.?10
0.040
0.150
0.020
0.055
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.010
0.010
0.005K
0.010
0.015
0.005
0.060
0.005K
0.010
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.110
0.070
0.020
0.160
0.090
0.075
0.160
0.030
0.090
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 76/05/04
2007D1
38 29 35.0 097 18 45.0 4
PERSY CREEK
20 7.5 WALDECK
T/M^ION RESERVOIR 100491
b£C RD 8ROG 5 MI W OF DURHAM
IIEPALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
DATE
FROM
TO
74/10/13
74/11/10
74/12/15
75/04/13
75/05/04
75/06/15
75/06/18
75/06/29
75/09/14
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
12 20
11 50
11 15
13 30
11 00
11 55
11 25
12 00
11 50
00630
N02S.N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.072
0.200
0.152
0.060
0.135
1.200
0.160
0.630
0.250
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
1.200
2.500
0.300
2.200
1.150
1.450
1.850
1.450
1.500
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.022
0.070
0.025
0.045
0.095
0.070
0.030
0.100
0.040
00671
PHOS-OIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.020
0.015
0.010
0.020
0.010
0.105
0.025
0.020
0.015
00665
PhOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.155
0.100
0.020
0.080
0.100
0.24C
0.400
0.110
0.250
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 76/05/04
DATE
FROM
TO
75/02/20
75/03/26
75/04/28
75/05/14
75/06/03
75/06/16
75/07/09
75/08/04
75/08/18
75/09/06
75/09/30
75/10/29
75/11/03
00630
TIME DEPTH N02&N03
OF N-TOTAL
DAY FEET
13
16
09
09
09
10
08
08
08
15
13
09
30
45
00
00
30
30
00
45
30
00
45
00
MG/L
6.
5.
6.
16.
8.
16.
15.
4.
16.
14.
16.
18.
18.
000
200
400
500
500
000
400
100
800
000
800
900
000
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
13.
15.
7.
11.
7.
2.
3.
16.
4.
3.
9.
8.
4.
000
000
000
500
600
900
800
000
800
600
600
600
900
00610 00671
NH3-N PHOS-DIS
TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L
3.
2.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
950
200
050K
050K
480
110
030
550
044
025K
040
041
100
MG/L P
3
7
8
5
6
4
3
2
6
6
7
5
6
.300
.500
.400
.400
.200
.000
.600
.600
.900
.500
.300
.200
.650
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
8.000
8.800
8.600
10.500
7.750
6.700
7.500
8.200
6.900
6.600
8.100
8.300
9.050
2007AA TF2007AA P000854
38 23 00.0 097 25 30.0 4
CANTON
20 7.5 CANTON
T/MAKION RESERVOIR 091193
COTTONWOOD RIVER
11EPALES 2141204
oooo FEET DEPTH CLASS oo
50051 50053
FLOW CONDUIT
RATE FLOW-MGD
INST MOD MONTHLY
0.975
K VALUE KNOWN TO -iE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------