U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
WORKING PAPER SERIES
REPORT
ON
POTONA RESERVOIR
OSAGE COUNTY
WAS
EPA REGION VII
WORKING PAPER No, 522
CORVALLIS ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY - CORVALLIS, OREGON
and
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING & SUPPORT LABORATORY - LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
•&G.P.O. 699-440
-------
REPORT
ON
POTONA RESERVOIR
OSAGE COUNTY
KftNSAS
EPA REG ION VII
WORKING PAPER No, 522
WITH THE COOPERATION OF THE
KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT
AND THE
KANSAS NATIONAL GUARD
APRIL, 1977
-------
CONTENTS
Page
£orew_qrd_ i i
List of Kansas Study Reservoirs iv
Lake and Drainage Area Map v
Sections
1. Conclusions 1
II. Lake and Drainage Basin Characteristics 4
III. Lake Water Quality Summary 5
IV. Nutrient Loadings 10
V. Literature Reviewed 15
VI. Appendices 16
-------
11
FOREWORD
The National Eutrophication Survey was initiated in 1972 in
response to an Administration commitment to investigate the nation-
wide threat of accelerated eutrophication to freshwater lakes and
reservoirs.
OBJECTIVES
The Survey was designed to develop, in conjunction with state
environmental agencies, information on nutrient sources, concentrations,
and impact on selected freshwater lakes as a basis for formulating
comprehensive and coordinated national, regional, and state management
practices relating to point-source discharge reduction and non-point
source pollution abatement in lake watersheds.
ANALYTIC APPROACH
The mathematical and statistical procedures selected for the
'Survey's eutrophication analysis are based on related concepts that:
a. A generalized representation or model relating
sources, concentrations, and impacts can be constructed.
b. By applying measurements of relevant parameters
associated with lake degradation, the generalized model
can be transformed into an operational representation of
a lake, its drainage basin, and related nutrients.
c. With such a transformation, an assessment of the
potential for eutrophication control can be made.
LAKE ANALYSIS
In this report, the first stage of evaluation of lake and water-
shed data collected from the study lake and its drainage basin is
documented. The report is formatted to provide state environmental
agencies with specific information for basin planning [§303(e)], water
quality criteria/standards review [§303(c)], clean lakes [S314(a,b)],
and water quality monitoring [§106 and §305(b)] activities mandated
by the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972.
-------
Ill
Beyond the single lake analysis, broader based correlations
between nutrient concentrations (and loading) and trophic condi-
tion are being made to advance the rationale and data base for
refinement of nutrient water quality criteria for the Nation's
freshwater lakes. Likewise, multivariate evaluations for the
relationships between land use, nutrient export, and trophic
condition, by lake class or use, are being developed to assist
in the formulation of planning guidelines and policies by EPA
and to augment plans implementation by the states.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The staff of the National Eutrophication Survey (Office of
Research & Development, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency)
expresses sincere appreciation to the Kansas State Department of
Health and Environment for professional involvement, to the Kansas
National Guard for conducting the tributary sampling phase of
the Survey, and to those Kansas wastewater treatment plant opera-
tors who voluntarily provided effluent samples and flow data.
The staff of the Kansas Division of Environmental Health pro-
vided invaluable lake documentation and counsel during the Survey,
reviewed the preliminary reports, and provided critiques most use-
ful in the preparation of this Working Paper series.
Major General Edward R. Fry, the Adjutant General of Kansas,
and Project Officer Colonel Albin L. Lundquist, who directed the
volunteer efforts of the Kansas National Guardsmen, are also grate-
fully acknowledged for their assistance to the Survey.
-------
IV
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
STUDY RESERVOIRS
STATE OF KANSAS
NAME COUNTY
Cedar Bluff Trego
Council Grove Morris
Elk City Montgomery
Fall River Greenwood
John Redmond Coffey, Lyon
Kanopolis Ellsworth
Marion Marion
Melvern Osage
Mil ford Clay, Geary
Norton Norton
Perry Jefferson
Pomona Osage
Toronto Greenwood, Woodson
Tuttle Creek Marshall, Potta-
watomie, Riley
Wilson Russell
-------
38°40'
X
POMONA RESERVOIR
) Tributary Sampling Site
Lake Sampling Site
Sewage Treatment Facility
Drainage Area Boundary
Land Subject to Inundation
10 aoKrn.
Scale
to Mi.
Map Location
Hundred and Ten
Mile Creek
9600'
95°50'
9540'
-------
POMONA RESERVOIR
STORE! NO. 2012
I. CONCLUSIONS
A. Trophic Condition:
Survey data indicate that Pomona Reservoir is potentially
eutrophic. However, the reservoir becomes quite turbid during
periods of runoff, and primary productivity is intermittently
light-limited (Kring, 1977).
This water body ranked eleventh in overall trophic quality
among the 15 Kansas reservoirs sampled in 1974 when compared
using a combination of six water quality parameters*. Four of
the reservoirs had less median total phosphorus, nine had less
median dissolved orthophosphorus, 13 had less median inorganic
nitrogen, five had less mean chlorophyll a., and seven had less
mean Secchi disc transparency. Depression of dissolved oxygen
with depth occurred at all three sampling stations in June.
Survey limnologists did not observe nuisance concentrations
of algae or macrophytes in the reservoir. However, the low
Secchi disc transparencies and numbers of phytoplankton (page 7)
indicate that reduced light penetration limits primary produc-
tivity. In a previous report on this water-body, it was noted
that nutrient levels are high at times, but that suspended sedi-
ments in the reservoir limit photosynthetic activity (Anonymous,
1975).
* See Appendix A.
-------
B. Rate-Limi ting Nutrient:
The algal assay results indicate that Pomona Reservoir was
phosphorus limited at the times the samples were collected (04/
11/74 and 10/01/74). The reservoir data indicate phosphorus
limitation at all sampling stations and times.
C. Nutrient Controllability:
1. Point sources—During the sampling year, point sources
contributed 20.5% of the total phosphorus input to Pomona Reser-
voir. The wastewater treatment plant at Burlingame contributed
5.4%, the plant at Eskridge contributed 4.7%, the facilities at
Scranton and Overbrook each contributed 4.3%, and the plant at
Harveyville contributed 1.8%.
The present phosphorus loading of 0.98 g/m2/year is 1.4 times
that proposed by Vollenweider (Vollenweider and Dillon, 1974) as
a eutrophic loading (see page 14). Nutrient-wise, the reservoir
is phosphorus limited, and reduction of phosphorus from point
sources should be considered if soil conservation practices are
initiated to reduce soil erosion in the drainage and thus reduce
turbidity in the reservoir.
2. Non-point sources--Non-point sources accounted for 89.5%
of the total phosphorus load during the sampling year. Dragoon
and Switzler creeks each contributed 23.8%, Hundred and Ten Mile
Creek contributed 6.4%, and Plummer Creek contributed 2.2%.
Ungaged minor tributaries and immediate drainage contributed an
estimated 21.5%.
-------
The phosphorus export rate of Switzler Creek was three
times the mean of the rates of the other gaged tributaries
(page 14) and was appreciably higher than the 24 kg/km2/yr
exports of the two gaged tributaries of nearby Melvern Reser-
voir*. The higher rate may be due to urban drainage from
Burlingame since the mean total phosphorus concentration in
Switzler Creek at station C-2 upstream from the Burlingame
wastewater treatment plant (see map, page v) was a high 0.124
mg/1 (Appendix E).
* Working Paper No. 518.
-------
II. RESERVOIR AND DRAINAGE BASIN CHARACTERISTICS'1"
A. Morphometry :
1. Surface area: 16.19 kilometers2.
2. Mean depth: 6.4 meters.
3. Maximum depth: 14.5 meters.
4. Volume: 103.614 x 106 m3.
5. Ten-year median hydraulic retention time: 193 days.
B. Tributary and Outlet:
(See Appendix C for flow data)
1. Tributaries -
Drainage Mean flow
Name area (km2)* (m3/sec)*
Hundred and Ten Mile Creek 77.4 0.460
Dragoon Creek 295.3 1.690
Switzler Creek 102.3 0.610
Plummer Creek 31.9 0.193
Minor tributaries &
immediate drainage - 310.9 2.380
Total 817.8 5.333
2. Outlet -
Hundred and Ten Mile Creek 834.0** 4.660
C. Precipitation***:
1. Year of sampling: 83.1 centimeters.
2. Mean annual: 95.1 centimeters.
t Table of metric conversions—Appendix B.
tt Kring, 1977.
* For limits of accuracy, see Working Paper No. 175, "...Survey Methods,
1973-1976".
** Includes area of reservoir.
*** See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
III. WATER QUALITY SUMMARY
Pomona Reservoir was sampled three times during the open-water
season of 1974 by means of a pontoon-equipped Huey helicopter. Each
time, samples for physical and chemical parameters were collected
from two or more depths at three stations on the reservoir (see map,
page v). During each visit, a single depth-Integrated (4.6 m or near
bottom to surface) sample was composited from the stations for phyto-
plankton identification and enumeration; and during the first and
last visits, a single 18.9-liter depth-integrated sample was composited
for algal assays. Also each time, a depth-integrated sample was col-
lected from each of the stations for chlorophyll a^ analysis. The maximum
depths sampled were 11.3 meters at station 1, 7.9 meters at station 2,
and 6.7 meters at station 3.
The sampling results are presented in full in Appendix D and are
summarized in the following table.
-------
TEMP (C)
OISS GXY (MG/L)
CNOCTVY (MCROMO)
PH (STAND UNITS)
TOT ALK (MG/L>
TOT P (MG/L)
ORTriO P (MG/L)
N02»N03 (MG/L)
AMMONIA (MG/L)
KJEL N (MG/L)
INORG N (MG/L)
TOTAL N (MG/L)
CHL«SYL A (UA/L>
SECCrtI (METEPS)
A. SUMMARY
1ST SA>'i
3
WANGE
10.6 - 11.5
8.6 - 1C.2
106. - 245.
8.2 - 8.3
149. - 15ft.
0.051 - 0.071
0.020 - 0.02P
1.130 - 1.360
0.030 - 0.070
0.300 - 0.600
1.160 - 1.410
1.4bO - 1.760
8.0 - 11.3
O.S - 0.5
°-:YSICAL AND CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS
STO-^tT CODE. 2012
S£SE«VOH
SITES
MEAN
10.9
9.7
205.
8.2
153.
0.053
0,023
1.22-)
0.047
0.444
1.270
1.663
9.S
0.5
Ml/74) JNO SAMPLING ( 6/25/74)
3 SITES
MEDIAN
10.9
9.8
230.
8.2
153.
0.055
0.023
1.200
0.050
0.400
1.240
1.660
9.1
0.5
20.6
2.0
349.
7.4
129.
0.026
0.016
1.010
0.050
0.300
1.120
1.510
7.8
0.3
ANljE
- 26.8
9.2
- 418.
8.5
- 152.
- 0.045
- 0.034
- 1.560
- 0.160
- 0.500
- 1.630
- 1.960
- 13.8
0.6
MEAN
23.6
6.2
398.
8.2
138.
O.U37
0.022
1.298
0.071
0.408
1.369
1.706
10.5
0.5
MEDIAN
23.6
7.0
396.
8.2
135.
0.036
0.021
1.300
0.060
0.400
1.370
1.680
9.9
0.5
rV
17.2
7.4
291.
8.0
140.
0.033
0.014
0.670
0.030
0.300
0.710
0.990
2.6
0.5
3*D SAMPLING ( 10/ l/7-»)
3 SITES
ANGE
- 18.2
8.8
- 331.
6.1
- 144.
- 0.050
- C.018
- 0.710
- 0.080
- 1.100
- 0.790
- 1.7dO
3.8
0.5
MEAN
17.7
8.0
318.
8.0
142.
0.039
0.016
0.690
0.052
0.500
0.742
1.190
3.3
0.5
MEDIA
17.5
9.0
325.
8.0
142.
0.038
0.015
0.690
0.050
0.400
0.740
1.090
3.3
0.5
-------
B. Biological Characteristics:
1. Phytoplankton -
Sampling
Date
04/11/74
06/25/74
10/01/74
Dominant
Genera
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1.
2.
3.
4.
Ankistrodesmus sp.
Stephanodiscus sp.
Melosira sp.
Chroomonas sp.
Cryptomonas sp.
Other genera
Total
Melosira sp.
Stephanodiscus SJD.
Euglena sp.
Cryptomonas sp.
Scenedesmus sp.
Total
Melosira sp.
Chroomonas sp.
Merismopedia _sp_.
Glenodinium s£.
Algal Units
per ml
1,663
489
391
342
147
50
3,082
2,872
801
94
47
47
3,861
184
92
92
46
Total
414
-------
2. Chlorophyll
Sampling
Date
04/11/74
06/25/74
10/01/74
Station
Number
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
C. Limiting Nutrient Study:
1. Autoclaved, filtered, and nutrient spiked -
a. April sample -
Spike (mg/1)
Control
0.050 P
0.050 P + 1.0 N
1.0 N
Ortho P
Cone, (mg/1)
0.020
0.070
0.070
0.020
b. October sample -
Spike (mg/1)
Control
0.050 P
0.050 P + 1.0 N
1.0 N
Ortho P
Cone, (mg/1)
0.010
0.060
0.060
0.010
Inorganic N
Cone, (mg/1)
1.125
1.125
2.125
2.125
Inorganic N
Cone, (mg/1
0.680
0.680
1.680
1.680
Chlorophyll a_
(yg/D
8.0
9.1
11.3
13.8
9.9
7.8
2.8
3.8
Maximum yield
(mg/1-dry wt.)
8.8
27.8
38.2
9.8
Maximum yield
(mg/1-dry wt.)
0.6
14.3
21.8
0.6
-------
2. Discussion -
The control yield of the assay alga, Selenastrum capri-
cornutum, indicates that the potential primary productivity
of Pomona Reservoir was high in April and moderate in October.
In both assays, increased yields with the addition of phos-
phorus alone indicate the reservoir was phosphorus limited
at those times. Note that the addition of nitrogen alone
did not result in yields significantly greater than those of
the controls.
The difference in the control yields during the two
sampling times indicates differences in availability of
nutrients for primary production. Note that orthophosphorus
concentrations were two times greater in the April sample.
The reservoir data also indicate phosphorus limitation.
The mean inorganic nitrogen/orthophosphorus ratios were 45/1
or greater at all sampling stations and times. However,
primary productivity in the reservoir is intermittently
light-limited rather than nutrient-limited.
-------
10
IV. NUTRIENT LOADINGS
(See Appendix E for data)
For the determination of nutrient loadings, the Kansas National
Guard collected monthly near-surface grab samples from each of the
tributary sites indicated on the map (page v), except for the months
of April, June, and July when two samples were collected. Sampling
was begun in October, 1974, and was completed in September, 1975.
Through an interagency agreement, stream flow estimates for the
year of sampling and a "normalized" or average year were provided by
the Kansas District Office of the U.S. Geological Survey for the
tributary sites nearest the reservoir.
In this report, nutrient loads for sampled tributaries were
determined by using a modification of a U.S. Geological Survey computer
program for calculating stream loadings*. Nutrient loads shown are
those measured minus point-source loads, if any.
Nutrient loads for unsampled "minor tributaries and immediate
drainage" ("II" of U.S.G.S.) were estimated using the nutrient loads
at station D-l, in kg/km2/year, and multiplying by the II area in km2.
The operator of the Burlingame wastewater treatment plant provided
monthly effluent samples and corresponding flow data. The operators of
the wastewater treatment plants at Scranton and Eskridge also provided
monthly samples; however, corresponding flow data were not available.
Nutrient loads for these facilities and the wastewater treatment plants
* See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
11
at Harveyville and Overbrook, which were not sampled, were estimated
at 1.134 kg P and 3.401 kg N/capita/year, and flows were estimated
at 0.3785 m3/capita/day.
A. Waste Sources:
1. Known municipal -
Name
Burlingame*
Eskridge*
Harveyville**
Overbrook**
Scranton*
2. Known industrial - None
Pop.
Served
1,071
652
250
600
601
Treatment
tr. filter
stab, pond
stab, pond
stab, pond
stab, pond
Mean Flow
(m3/d)
233.4
246.8
94.6
227.1
227.5
Receiving
Water
Switzler Creek
Dragoon Creek
Dragoon Creek
Unnamed creek
Hundred and Ten
Mile Creek
* Treatment plant questionnaires.
** Anonymous, 1971.
-------
12
B. Annual Total Phosphorus Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
kg P/ % of
Source yr total
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
Hundred and Ten Mile Creek 1,010 6.4
Dragoon Creek 3,780 23.8
Switzler Creek 3,780 23.8
Plummer Creek 355 2.2
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non-point load) - 3,420 21.5
c. Known municipal STP's -
Burlingame 860 5.4
Eskridge 740 4.7
Harveyville 285 1.8
Overbrook 680 4.3
Scranton 680 4.3
d. Septic tanks - Unknown ?
e. Known industrial - None
f. Direct precipitation* - 285 1.8
Total 15,875 100.0
2. Outputs -
Reservoir outlet - Hundred and Ten
Mile Creek 13,385
3. Net annual P accumulation - 2,490 kg.
* See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
13
C. Annual Total Nitrogen Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
kg N/ % of
Source yr total
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
Hundred and Ten Mile Creek 44,635 12.1
Dragoon Creek 120,805 32.6
Switzler Creek 57,920 15.6
PIummer Creek 11,150 3.0
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non-point load) - 108,815 29.4
c. Known municipal STP's -
Burlingame 2,080 0.6
Eskridge 2,215 0.6
Harveyvilie 850 0.2
Overbrook 2,040 0.6
Scranton 2,045 0.6
d. Septic tanks - Unknown ?
e. Known industrial - None
f. Direct precipitation* - 17.480 4.7
Total 370,035 100.0
2. Outputs -
Reservoir outlet - Hundred and Ten
Mile Creek 316,370
3. Net annual N accumulation - 53,665 kg.
See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
14
D. Non-point Nutrient Export by Subdrainage Area:
Tributary kg P/km2/yr kg N/km2/yr
Hundred and Ten Mile Creek 13 577
Dragoon Creek 13 409
Switzler Creek 37 566
. Plummer Creek 11 350
E. Yearly Loads:
In the following table, the existing phosphorus loadings
are compared to those proposed by Vollenweider (Vollenweider
and Dillon, 1974). Essentially, his "dangerous" loading is
one at which the receiving water would become eutrophic or
remain eutrophic; his "permissible" loading is that which
would result in the receiving water remaining oligotrophic
or becoming oligotrophic if morphometry permitted. A meso-
trophic loading would be considered one between "dangerous"
and "permissible".
Note that Vollenweider's model may not be applicable to
water bodies with short hydraulic retention times.
Total Phosphorus Total Nitrogen
Total Accumulated Total Accumulated
grams/mVyr 0.98 0.15 22.9 3.3
Vollenweider phosphorus loadings
(g/m2/yr) based on mean depth and 10-year median
hydraulic retention time of Pomona Reservoir:
"Dangerous" (eutrophic loading) 0.68
"Permissible" (oligotrophic loading) 0.34
-------
15
V. LITERATURE REVIEWED
Anonymous, 1971. Inventory of municipal waste facilities. EPA
Publ. OWP-1, vol. 7, Wash., DC.
Anonymous, 1975. Draft environmental statement: Operation and
maintenance - Pomona Lake, Kansas. U.S. Army Engr. Distr.,
Kansas City, MO.
Kring, R. Lynn, 1977. Personal communication (revised reservoir
morphometry; primary productivity). KS Dept. of Health &
Environment, Topeka.
Vollenweider, R. A., and P. J. Dillon, 1974. The application of
the phosphorus loading concept to eutrophication research.
Natl. Res. Council of Canada Publ. No. 13690, Canada Centre
for Inland Waters, Burlington, Ontario.
-------
VI. APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
LAKE RANKINGS
-------
LAKE DATA TO BE USED IN RANKINGS
LAKE
CODE LAKE NAME
2001 CEDAR RLUFF RESERVOIR
2002 COUNCIL GROVE
2003 ELK CITY
2004 FALL RIVER RESERVOIR
2005 JOHN REDMOND RESERVOIR
2006 KANOPOLIS RESERVOIR
2007 MARION RESERVOIR
2008 MELVERN RESERVOIR
2009 MILFORD RESERVOIR
2010 NORTON RESERVOIR
2011 PERRY RESERVOIR
2012 POMONA RESERVOIR
2013 TORONTO RESERVOIR
2014 TUTTLE CREEK RESERVOIR
2015 WILSON RESERVOIR
MEDIAN
TOTAL P
0.017
0.069
0.030
0.053
0.118
0.056
0.052
0.034
0.079
0.122
0.055
0.040
O.C67
0.162
0.023
MEDIAN
INORG N
0.055
0.830
0.590
0.470
1.250
0.640
0.430
0.265
0.710
0.110
0.970
1.240
0.425
0.970
0.265
500-
MEAN SEC
431.667
485.889
490.400
488.667
492.667
487.000
483.667
459.111
466.333
476.750
478.571
481.333
488.500
470.667
445.222
MEAN
CHLORA
4.217
9.789
3.212
7.683
9.467
16.033
12.400
30.400
18.683
21.360
5.614
8.312
6.583
11.278
8.867
15-
MIN DO
10.800
10.400
14.000
9.200
8.200
10.200
9.000
14.400
12.800
8.000
13.400
13.000
13.000
13.600
13.400
MEDI,
DISS ORTi
0.004
0.028
0.003
0.016
0.066
0.011
0.010
0.007
0.036
0.036
0.017
0.021
0.011
0.067
0.004
-------
LAKES RANKED 3Y INDEX NOS.
RANK LAKE CODE LAKE NAME INDEX NO
1 2001 CEDAR BLUFF RESERVOIR 539
2 2015 WILSON RESERVOIR 439
3 2007 MARION RESERVOIR 357
4 2003 ELK CITY 350
5 2004 FALL RIVER RESERVOIR 328
6 2008 MELVERN RESERVOIR 326
7 2013 TORONTO RESERVOIR ' 303
8 2010 NORTON RESERVOIR 292
9 2011 PERRY RESERVOIR 279
10 2006 KANOPOLIS RESERVOIR 271
11 2012 POMONA RESERVOIR 267
12 2002 COUNCIL GROVE 230
13 2009 MILFORD RESERVOIR 214
14 2005 JOHN REDMOND RESERVOIR 164
15 2014 TUTTLE CREEK RESERVOIR 139
-------
PERCENT OF LAKES WITH HIGHER VALUES (NUMBER OF LAKES WITH HIGHER VALUES)
LAKE
CODE LAKE NAME
2001 CEDAR BLUFF RESERVOIR
2002 COUNCIL GROVE
2003 ELK CITY
2004 FALL RIVER RESERVOIR
2005 JOHN REDMOND RESERVOIR
2006 KANOPOLIS RESERVOIR
2007 MARION RESERVOIR
200ft MELVERN RESERVOIR
2009 MILFORD RESERVOIR
2010 NORTON RESERVOIR
20H PERRY RESERVOIR
2012 POMONA RESERVOIR
2013 TORONTO RESERVOIR
2014 TUTTLE CREEK RESERVOIR
2015 WILSON RESERVOIR
MEDIAN
TOTAL P
100 <
29 (
86 (
57 (
14 (
43 (
64 (
79 (
21 (
7 (
50 (
71 <
36 (
0 (
93 (
14)
4)
12)
8)
2)
6)
9)
11)
3>
1)
7)
10)
5)
0)
13)
MEDIAN
INORG N
100 1
29 (
50 (
57 (
0 (
43 1
64 <
82 (
36 1
93 (
18 1
7 1
71 1
18 i
82 <
: 14)
: 4)
: 7)
: 8)
: o>
1 6)
; 9)
: ID
; 5)
: 13>
[ 2)
t i)
I 10)
( 2)
( 11)
500-
MEAN SEC-
100 (
36 (
7 I
14 (
0 (
29 (
43 (
86 (
79 (
64 (
57 (
50 (
21 (
71 (
93 (
14)
5)
1)
2)
0)
4)
6)
12)
11)
9)
3)
7)
3)
10)
13)
MEAN
CHLORA
93 (
43 (
100 <
71 <
50 (
21 I
29 <
0 I
14 (
7 1
86 1
64 1
79 1
36 I
57 I
: 13)
; 6)
; 14)
: 10)
; 7)
: 3)
; 4)
; o)
; 2)
: i>
; 12)
; 9)
i ID
I 5)
I 8)
15-
MIN 00
57 (
64 (
7 (
79 (
93 (
71 (
86 (
0 (
50 (
100 (
25 (
39 (
39 (
14 (
25 (
8)
9)
1)
11)
13)
10)
12)
0)
7)
14)
3)
5)
5)
2)
3)
MEDIAN
DISS ORTHO P
89 <
29 1
100 1
50 1
7 1
64 (
71 1
79 1
14 1
21 <
43 I
36 1
57 i
0 <
89 i
: i2>
! 4)
: 14)
; 7)
: i)
: 9)
: io>
: ID
[ 2)
[ 3)
[ 6)
! 5)
t 8)
I 0)
I 12)
INDEX
NO
539
230
350
328
164
271
357
326
214
292
279
267
303
139
439
-------
APPENDIX B
CONVERSION FACTORS
-------
CONVERSION FACTORS
Hectares x 2.471 = acres
Kilometers x 0.6214 = miles
Meters x 3.281 = feet
Cubic meters x 8.107 x 10~4 = acre/feet
Square kilometers x 0.3861 = square miles
Cubic meters/sec x 35.315 = cubic feet/sec
Centimeters x 0.3937 = inches
*
Kilograms x 2.205 = pounds
Kilograms/square kilometer x 5.711 = Ibs/square mile
-------
APPENDIX C
TRIBUTARY FLOW DATA
-------
RY FLOW INFORMATION FOR KANSAS
05/03/76
LAKE CODE 2012 POMONA
TOTAL DRAINAGE A
OF LAKEISQ
SUB-DRAINAGE
TRIBUTARY AREA(S3 KM)
JAN
FEB
C34.0
MAR
APR
NORMALIZED FLOoSICMS)
JL'.'J JJL. AJG
SEP
ocr
NUV
DEC
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA OF LAKE = 834.0
SUM OF SUB-DRAINAGE AREAS = 834.0
MEAN MONTHLY FLO*S AND DAILY FLOWS
TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAR MEAN FLOW DAY
2012A1
FLOW DAY
2012A2
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
?
3
it
5
6
7
8
9
74
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
74
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
2.489
13.620
2.274
8.863
10.307
6.003
6.881
4.276
20.048
16.764
0.425
0.453
0.595
0.934
0.221
0.539
0.906
0.793
0.850
0.368
2.15?
0.093
0.034
0.013
13
9
1C
14
11
10
IS
3
4
9
23
12
13
9
10
14
11
10
15
3
4
9
23
12
0.765
3.455
0.566
14.300
10.024
3.879
3.631
10.024
14.442
3.568
0.425
0.453
16.990
1.841
0.167
1.416
0.708
0.201
1.274
1.133
0.991
8.495
0.0
0.0
16
24
22
18
24
22
SUMMARY
TOTAL FLOW IN = 64.00
TOTAL FLOW OUT = 55.90
FLOW DAY
FLOW
0.878
0.736
0.340
0.071
J.595
0.025
MEAN
2012A1
2012A2
2012dl
2012C1
201201
2012Z2
834.0
77.4
295.3
102.3
31.9
327.1
2.83
0.23
0.82
0.31
0.099
1.10
4.81
0.28
1.05
0.37
0.116
1.36
3.11
0.71
2.27
0.91
0.311
2.83
7.08
0.68
2.66
0.91
0.283
3.68
8.21
0.82
2.e3
1.08
0.340
3.96
7.03
0.71
2.^3
0,-yfi
0.275
3.96
7.08
0.76
2.66
0.99
0.340
3.63
3.40
0.22
0 • •*!
0.31
0.088
1.70
1.19
0.31
1.27
0.<+0
0.116
2.01
5.66
0.40
1.42
0.51
0.164
1.98
2.83
0.20
O.dS
0.27
0.079
1.19
2.61
0.22
0.76
0.26
0.099
1.08
4.66
0.46
1.69
0.61
0.193
2.38
-------
TRI3UTA3Y FLOW INFORMATION FOR Ki'.SAS
05/03/76
LA
YEAR
10
11
12
1
?
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
R
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
fi
9
74
74
7".
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
74
7t
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
74
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
74
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
MEAN FLOW
1.911
3.4t33
0.699
1.833
3.143
2.393
2.973
1.220
8.467
0.311
0.133
0.051
0.736
1.246
0.280
0.736
1.189
1.019
1.133
0.481
2.832
0.122
0.048
0.017
0.241
0.368
0.099
0.238
0.368
0.363
0.340
0.150
0.850
0.042
0.013
0.005
2.832
5.380
1.07-S
2.662
4.531
3.115
4.531
1.756
12.176
0.453
0.253
0.085
DAY
13
9
10
14
7
10
15
3
4
9
23
12
13
9
10
14
11
10
15
3
9
23
12
13
9
10
14
11
10
IS
3
4
9
23
12
FLO* OAT
30.016
1.133
0.566
1.076
0.0
1.303
5.069
1.982
1.926
0.566
0.045
0.453
5.380
1.216
0.368
1.133
0.595
0.340
0.368
0.708
FLO* DAY
FLQw
0.037
0.003
0.065
1.133
0.340
0.0
0.198
0.014
0.113
0.170
0.283
0.164
0.023
0.0
0.0
18
24
22
0.130
2.718
0.093
22
0.020
16
24
22
0.934
0.170
0.003
-------
APPENDIX D
PHYSICAL and CHEMICAL DATA
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DA?E 76/05/03
DATE
FROM
ro
74/04/11
74/06/25
74/10/01
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
13 55 0000
13 55 0005
13 55 0015
13 55 0020
14 45 0000
14 45 0005
14 45 OOlb
14 45 0025
14 45 0037
14 30 0000
14 30 0005
14 30 0015
14 30 0024
00010
WATER
TtMP
CENt
10.8
10.7
10.7
10.6
26.8
26.4
23.6
23.5
20.6
18.1
18.2
17.5
17.4
201201
38 39 02.0 095 33 49.0 3
POMONA RESERVOIR
20139 KANSAS
091491
11E-4LES 2111202
0027 FEET DEPTh CLASS 00
00300
DO
MG/L
10.0
10.2
9.6
9.0
9.2
7.0
6.8
2.0
8.0
7.4
8.0
8.0
00077
TRANSP
SECCnl
INCHES
18
24
21
00094
CNDUCTVY
FIELD
MICROMHO
106
155
233
245
416
414
393
390
349
331
299
327
309
00400
PH
SU
8.30
8.20
8.2C
8.20
8.50
6. SO
8.40
8.10
7.40
8.01
8.09
8.03
8.03
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
153
152
153
154
137
135
135
134
129
143
142
144
142
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.070
0.050
0.030
0.030
0.050
0.050
0.050
0.060
0.070
0.060
0.030
0.080
0.050
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.400
0.300
0.300
0.400
0.500
0.500
0.400
0.300
0.400
1.100
0.500
0.300
0.400
00630
N02&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
1.330
1.360
1.160
.260
.150
.340
.320
.340
.560
0.680
0.690
0.710
0.700
00671
PHOS-DIS
OHTHO
MG/L P
0.026
0.024
0.022
0.022
0.016
0.016
0.018
0.019
0.025
0.017
0.015
0.016
0.014
00665
DATE TIME DEPTH PHOS-TOT
FROM OF
TO DAY FEET MG/L P
74/04/11 13 55 0000 0.058
13 ^5 0005 0.053
13 55 0015 0.052
13 55 0020 0.052
74/06/25 14 45 0000 0.026
14 45 0005 0.033
14 45 000?
14 45 0015 0.035
14 45 0025 0.033
14 45 0037 0.040
74/10/01 14 30 0000 0.043
14 30 0004
14 30 0005 0.038
14 30 0015 C.035
14 30 0024 0.037
32217 00031
CHLRPHYL INCUT LT
A REMMING
UG/L PERCENT
8.0
13.8
2.8
1.0
1.0
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 76/05/03
201202
36 39 56.0 095 35 15.0 3
POMONA RESERVOIR
20139 i\A.\SAS
091491
11E=ALES 2111202
0020 FEET 9EPTH CLASS 00
DATE
FROM
TO
74/04/11
74/06/25
74/10/01
DATE
FROM
TO
74/04/U
74/06/25
74/10/01
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
14 15 0000
14 15 0005
14 15 0015
14 25 0000
14 25 0005
14 25 0015
14 25 0026
15 00 0000
15 00 0005
15 00 0016
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
14 15 0000
14 15 0005
14 15 0015
14 25 0000
14 25 0005
14 25 0006
14 25 0015
14 25 0026
15 00 0000
15 00 000*
15 00 0005
15 00 0016
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
10.9
10.9
10.9
23.9
23.7
23.4
23.0
la.o
17.5
17.5
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.063
0.051
0.055
0.030
0.03H
0.036
0.040
0.050
0.034
0.033
00300 00077 00094 00400 00*10 00610 00625 00630 00671
DO TRANSP CNDUCTVY PH T ALK NH3-N TOT KJEL N026.M03 P-lOS-OIS
SECCHl FIELD CAC03 TOTAL N N-TOTAL OSTHO
MG/L INCHES MICROMHC SU Mu/L Mo/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P
13 210 8.20
8.6 189 8.20
9.6 235 8.20
7.4 18 396 8.40
7.0 395 8.30
5.4 391 8.20
3.8 384 7.80
8.0 21 329 8.03
8.0 323 8.05
7.8 291 8.05
32217 00031
CHLRPHYL 1UCOT LT
A REMNING
OG/L PERCENT
9.1
9.9
1.0
3.8
1.0
150 0.050 0.600 1.160 0.028
149 0.070 0.400 1.250 0.022
150 0.040 0.400 1.200 0.023
134 0.070 0.400 1.280 0.019
135 0.070 0.400 1.240 0.021
135 0.060 0.300 1.240 0.021
137 0.060 0.400 1.300 0.025
140 0.040 0.400 0.090 0.017
141 0.050 0.300 0.700 0.015
141 0.040 0.300 0.690 0.015
-------
STORE! SETftlFVAL DATE 76/05/03
201203
38 40 02.0 095 37 03.0 3
POMONA RESERVOIR
2013^ KANSAS
091491
11EPALES 2111202
0011 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
DATE
FKOM
TO
74/0^/1 1
74/06/25
74/10/01
DATE
FROM
TO
74/04/11
74/06/25
74/10/01
TIME DEPTH
OF
UAY FEET
16 00 0000
16 00 0005
13 55 0000
13 55 0005
13 55 0015
13 55 0022
15 25 0000
15 25 0005
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
16 00 0000
16 00 0005
13 55 0000
13 55 0005
13 55 0015
13 55 0022
15 25 0000
15 25 0003
15 25 0005
00010
MATER
TtMP
CENT
11.5
11.5
24.0
23.8
23.3
22.8
17.7
17.2
00665
PriOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.066
0.071
0.035
0.045
0.045
0.044
0.038
0.041
00300
DO
MG/L
10.0
7.4
7.0
5.0
4.2
8.8
8.0
32217
CHLRPHYL
A
UG/L
11.3
7.8
00077
TRflNSP
SECCHI
INCHES
18
12
18
00031
INCDT LT
REMNING
PERCENT
1.0
1.0
00094
CNDUCTVY
FIELD
MICKOMhO
230
245
406
403
416
418
327
325
00400
PH
su
8.30
8.20
8.50
8.20
8.00
7.90
8.05
8.07
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
158
155
143
141
147
152
142
142
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.030
0.050
0.050
0.060
0.110
0.160
0.080
0.040
00025
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.600
0.600
0.400
0.400
0.500
0.400
0.800
0.400
00b30
N02&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
1.130
1.160
1.380
1.450
1.010
1.270
0.680
0.670
00671'
PnOS-OIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.020
0.023
0.023
0.024
0.034
0.031
0.018
0.015
-------
APPENDIX E
TRIBUTARY AND WASTEWATER
TREATMENT PLANT DATA
-------
STOKET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/05/04
2012A1
38 3a 41.0 095 33 34.0
HUNuHtD AND TEN MILE C
20
VASSAR
0/PO'ONA
091491
BANK SAMPLE JUST BELOrf Sw END OF 0AM
11EPALES
0000 FEET
2111204
CLASS 00
DATE TIME DEPTH N02;.N03
FtfOM OF
TO OAf FEET
74/10/13
74/ J 1/09
74/12/10
75/01/14
75/02/11
75/03/10
75/04/15
75/05/03
75/05/18
75/06/04
75/06/24
75/07/09
75/07/22
75/08/23
75/09/12
10
13
09
09
09
09
09
09
10
17
17
18
17
13
11
16
25
15
20
00
00
30
30
05
50
50
10
40
15
30
0630 00625
;.N03 TOT KJEL
OTAL N
G/L MG/L
3.660
0.690
C.660
0.640
0.624
0.728
0.600
0.570
0.650
0.750
0.980
0.720
0.300
0.155
.^00
.900
.700
.700
.400
.100
.650
.630
.250
.600
.750
.150
.250
.350
0.450 0.700
OC610 00671 00665
NH;)-N PnOS-DIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L
0.035
0.070
0.060
0.056
0.030
0.024
0.025
0.080
0.090
0.025
0.020
o.oeo
0.320
0.400
0.025
MG/L P
0.015
0.035
0.030
0.030
0.008K
0.006K
0.005K
0.010
0.015
0.010
0.045
0.025
0.025
0.020
0.020
MG/L f>
0.04C
0.060
0.060
0.040
0.070
0.020
0.060
0.050
0.070
0.050
0.520
0.250
0.140
0.110
0.060
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
5TORET SET3IF.V4L
76/05/04
DATE
FrtOM
TO
7WIO/13
74/11/09
7<*/12/10
75/01/14
75/02/11
75/03/10
75/04/15
75/05/03
75/05/18
75/06/04
75/06/24
75/07/09
75/07/2?
TIME i
OF
DAY I
11 15
14 10
10 30
10 30
10 15
10 15
10 15
13 40
11 15
17 15
17 35
17 20
17 05
FEET
2012A2
38 4-* 20.0 095 40 15.0 4
AND TEN MILE CK
20
SEC
0630
t.N03
OTAL
G/L
2.C30
0.900
0."»46
1.6BO
1.650
0.980
0.345
0.850
0.470
1.500
1.570
0.345
0.245
00625
TOT KJEL
N
•-IG/L
4.600
1.500
1.20C
3.900
l.POO
O.«00
1.050
2.900
1.150
1.580
0.750
1.150
7.680
00610
NHT-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.140
0.045
0.020
0.120
0.088
0.028
0.050
0.135
0.070
0.025
0.025
0.045
0.145
00671
PMOS-OIS
OKTnO
MG/L P
0.140
0.090
0.010
0.064
0.032
0.016
0.055
0.015
0.045
0.050
0.015
0.020
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.180
0.030
0.230
0.110
0.030
0.060
0.070
0.325
0.130
0.070
0.075
7.5 LYNDON N*
B^OG 5 MI 3
: FEET
09U91
Of CAHbONOALE
211U04
CLASS 00
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL OATE 76/05/04
38 t*2 30.0 095 50 20.0 <*
DRAGOON CREEK
20 7.5 ObAGE CITY
T/PO«ON« KESERvO.I* 091491
BR3G i.s MI 5 OF'ouRLiNGAMt"
IIE^LES 21112;-*
ooco FEET DEJTH CLASS oo
DATE
FROM
TO
74/10/13
74/11/09
74/12/10
75/01/14
75/03/10
75/04/15
75/05/03
75/05/18
75/06/04
75/06/24
75/07/09
75/07/22
75/08/23
75/09/12
00630 00625
TIME OEPTi N02^N03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TOTAL N
DAY FEET
12
15
11
11
12
12
12
12
18
19
18
18
11
09
00
25
00
30
25
10
00
15
40
20
50
20
50
30
MU/L
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
.120
.910
.768
.160
.845
.735
.590
.660
.880
.400
.735
.510
.130
.105
MG/L
3.
0.
1.
3.
0.
0.
1.
1.
1.
0.
0.
2.
0.
0.
700
700
200
100
800
950
050
250
400
900
500
700
850
800
00610 00671 00665
NHT-N PnOi-DIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL 0«'TnO
MG/L M'i/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
095
030
010
352
192
143
185
020
045
070
010
050
115
057
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
p
055
045
010
040
016
015
025
005K
045
045
010
010
010
030
MG/L P
0.090
0.030
0.160
0.050
0.080
0.110
0.060
0.220
0.130
0.050
0.070
0.070
0.115
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
ET RETRIEVAL DATE 7fc/05/04
2oiaci
38 <»2 45.0 095 48 05.0 4
SrflT^LER CREEK
20 7.5 OSAGE CITY
T/POMONA RESERVOIR 091491
SEC ^0 S*DG BELOW fluWLlNGAME STP
11F.PALES 21112C-*
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
OATE
FSOM
TO
74/10/13
7W11/09
7<4/12/10
75/01/14
75/02/11
75/03/10
75/04/15
75/05/03
75/05/18
75/06/04
75/06/24
75/07/09
75/07/22
75/08/23
75/09/12
TIME OEPT-
OF
DAY FEET
12
17
11
11
11
11
11
11
12
09
18
19
18
11
09
10
10
20
15
15
50
50
30
35
10
00
15
45
30
50
Ou63o 00625
1 N02sN03 TOT K.JEL
N-TOTAL N
MG/L
3
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
2
1
0
0
.700
.120
.120
.240
.900
.310
.870
.890
.300
.600
.450
.300
.450
.300
.210
MG/L
3
1
1
3
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
4
1
0
.700
,*00
.100
.700
.300
.700
.900
.750
.250
.800
.200
.600
.600
.400
.700
OC610 00671 00665
NM?-N PHOS-DIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
u.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
240
090
135
280
144
064
175
280
075
090
050
027
075
353
025
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
p
220
075
110
056
104
072
090
055
020
050
050
115
105
055
065
MG/L P
0.89S
0.150
0.170
0.170
0.270
0.160
0.210
0.250
0.110
0.310
0.220
0.170
' 0.210
0.130
0.160
-------
STO*ET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/05/04
2012C2
38 44 45.0 095 49 25.0 4
s«uT2LER CREEK
20 7.5 OSAGE CITr
T/PQMONA SESEr?VOlK 091491
SEC *0 8ROG A90VE dUKLINGAME STP
11E-ALES 2111204
oooo FEET DEPTH CLASS oo
DATE
FP.GH
TO
74/10/13
74/1 1/09
74/12/10
75/01/14
75/02/11
75/03/10
75/04/15
75/05/03
75/05/18
75/06/04
75/06/24
75/07/09
75/07/22
75/08/23
75/09/12
00630 00625
TIME DEPTh N02&N03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TCTAL N
DAY FEET
12
15
11
10
10
11
11
10
11
18
18
19
19
11
09
30
35
40
55
45
30
30
30
45
?Q
55
40
10
15
00
MG/L
1
1
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
.160
.000
.930
.240
.880
.155
.790
.750
.950
.500
.570
.880
.100
.340
.360
MG/L
2.
1.
1.
4.
1.
0.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
0.
1.
0.
800
300
300
200
300
500
300
150
450
500
100
000
700
050
800
00610 00671 00665
Nrt3-N PriOS-OIS PhOS-TOT
TOTAL OP.THO
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
200
050
030
200
080
040
165
390
120
Ot>5
065
030
020
070
070
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
b.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
p
055
060
015
100
016
008
025
020
085
025
065
025
020
015
035
MG/L P
0.120
O.OSO
0.130
0.11C
0.030
0.060
0.150
0.220
0.240
0.250
0.060
C.050
0.100
0.170
-------
STO^ET RETRIEVAL DATE 7*,/05/'.'4
DATE TIME DEPTH N02&N03
FROM OF
TO DAY FEET
74/10/13
74/11/09
75/01/14
75/02/11
75/03/10
75/04/15
75/05/03
75/05/18
75/06/04
75/06/24
75/07/09
75/07/22
11
13
10
09
09
09
14
10
17
17
17
19
00
50
05
40
30
55
00
45
30
15
40
30
2U12D1
38 43 30.0 095 37 45.0 4
PLUMMER CREEK
20 7.5 LfNDON N»
T/POMONA rtESE^VOI* 091491
AT SftDG OM BLACKTOP ROAD
11EPALES 211120-
OOOC FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
0630
&N03
OT4L
G/L
o.eoo
0.672
1.060
0.900
0.320
0.085
0.360
0.185
0.670
0.530
0.290
0.045
00625
TOT KJEL
N
HG/L
2.200
1.400
1.800
1.500
1.000
1.000
2.300
0.900
1.100
0.600
0.350
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.060
0.03C
0.120
0.152
0.021
0.095
0.070
0.030
0.040
0.020
0.020
0.1 10
00671
PnOS-DlS
URTHO
MG/L P
O.C65
0.035
0.024
0.008K
0.008K
0.035
0.050
0.005K
0.030
0.030
0.010
0.005
00665
PhOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.050
0.100
0.040
0.010
0.035
0.040
0.160
0.090
0.040
0.050
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/C5/04
2012aA PD2012BA PQ00601
38 46 00.0 095 45 30.0 4
SC^ANTON
20 7.5 8URLINGAME
T/PQHONA RES. 091492
DRAGOON CREEK
11EPALES 2141204
oooc FEET DEPTH CLASS oo
00630
DATE TIME DEPTH N02&N03
FROM OF N-TOTAL
TO DAY FEET
75/03/17 14 00
75/04/21 10 00
75/05/08 15 30
75/05/28 09 00
75/06/19 14 00
75/07/09 09 00
75/08/05 11 00
75/08/25 22 00
75/09/11 23 00
75/10/06 10 00
75/10/28 14 00
75/11/24 14 30
75/12/08 10 30
MG/L
0.320
0.450
0.300
0.050
0.050
7.200
0.100
0.050
0.025
0.100
0.250
0.300
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
1.200
3.400
3.500
3.300
2.400
2.500
4.700
9.000
11.400
11.000
9.700
10.000
11.000
00610 00671 00665 50051 50053
NH3-N PHOS-DIS OHOS-TOT FLO* CONDUIT
TOTAL OrtTttO RATE FLOw-MGD
MG/L
0.170
0.150
0.110
0.050K
0.050K
0.050K
0.050
0.050
0.025K
0.100
0.050
0.280
MG/L P
0.750
0.890
1.150
0.730
0.880
3.000
0.870
0.850
1.800
1.900
2.100
2.630
MG/L P INST MGD MONTHLY
0.870
1.100
1.600
1.200
1.600
3.900
1.600
1.500
2.600
2.700
3.000
4.800
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/05/C4
20126B PD2012B6 "000652
38 51 30.0 096 06 15.0 4
ESKRIOGE
20 KA6AUNSEE CO
T/POMONA RES 091492
DRAGOON CREEK
DATE
FROM
TO
75/01/16
75/02/21
75/03/18
75/04/18
75/05/19
75/06/16
75/07/15
75/08/14
75/09/19
75/10/21
75/11/21
75/12/18
76/01/15
00630
TIME DEPTH N02<*N03
OF N-TOTftL
DAY FEET
09
08
09
09
10
11
13
09
10
15
10
09
13
00
30
00
30
30
00
00
00
00
00
00
30
30
MG/L
0,
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
.320
.160
.080
,450
.050
.100
.075
.075
.175
.050
,225
.450
.650
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
15.000
23.000
7.600
10.500
12.000
6.900
3.900
8.100
10.000
13.000
13.000
6.000
28.000
11EPALES 2141204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00610 00671 00665 50051 50053
NH3-N PHOS-DI5 PHOS-TOT FLO* CONDUIT
TOTAL OSTHO RATE FLOw-MGD
MG/L
i
9
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
.400
.500
.700
.170
.050K
.076
.025K
.200
.063
.032
.110
.120
.900
MG/L
3.
5.
4.
2.
0.
1.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
1.
P
700
900
900
000
870
600
590
800
100
860
760
740
600
MG/L P INST MGD MONTHLY
4
6
5
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
.600
.700
.600
.600
.500
.700
.050
.500
.900
.700
.800
.300
.700
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STDRET RETRIEVAL DATE ?6/OS/0<*
2012CA AS2012CA P001071
38 44 40.0 095 49 30.0 4
BURLINGAME
20 7.5 BURLINGAME
T/POMONA RES. 091491
SHITZLER CREEK
UEPALES 2141204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
DATE
FROM
TO
75/04/21
75/05/21
75/06/20
75/07/21
75/08/20
75/09/22
75/10/20
75/11/19
75/12/19
76/01/19
76/02/20
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY
08
08
08
08
09
08
08
08
08
08
08
FEET
30
30
00
00
30
30
30
do
30
30
15
00630
N02S.N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
3.150
5.250
6.400
10.500
10.500
0.200
16.000
4.730
7.300
2.300
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
8.900
7.200
2.200
7.600
6.500
30.000
14.000
28.000
5.800
21.000
20.000
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.064
0.063
0.072
0.210
0.260
10.000
1.200
9.800
0.025K
7.250
00671
PHOS-DIS
00665
PHOS-TOT
ORTHO
MG/L
1.
2.
J»
3.
7.
4.
11.
12.
3.
P
800
300
730
300
000
900
500
600
900
MG/L P
2.200
<».300
2.400
8.700
9.000
9.300
13.000
14.000
5.800
9.450
50051
FLOW
RATE
INST
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
MGD
.060
.060
.060
.060
.060
.060
.050
50053
CONDUIT
FLO*-MGD
MONTHLY
0.050
0.070
0.060
0.060
0.060
0.070
0.060
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
------- |