U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
WORKING PAPER SERIES
REPORT
ON
WILSON RESERVOIR
RUSSELL COUNTY
KANSAS
EPA REGION VII
WORKING PAPER No, 525
CORVALLIS ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY - CORVALLIS, OREGON
and
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING & SUPPORT LABORATORY - LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
699-440
-------
REPORT
ON
WILSON RESERVOIR
RUSSELL COUNTY
KANSAS
EPA REGION VII
WORKING PAPER No, 525
WITH THE COOPERATION OF THE
KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT
AND THE
KANSAS NATIONAL GUARD
-------
CONTENTS
Page
Foreword ii
List of Kansas Study Reservoirs iv
Lake and Drainage Area Map v
Sections
I. Conclusions 1
II. Lake and Drainage Basin Characteristics 3
III. Lake Water Quality Summary 4
IV. Nutrient Loadings 9
V. Literature Reviewed 14
VI. Appendices 15
-------
ii
FOREWORD
The National Eutrophication Survey was initiated in 1972 in
response to an Administration commitment to investigate the nation-
wide threat of accelerated eutrophication to freshwater lakes and
reservoirs.
OBJECTIVES
o
The Survey was designed to develop, in conjunction with state
environmental agencies, information on nutrient sources, concentrations,
and impact on selected freshwater lakes as a basis for formulating
comprehensive and coordinated national, regional, and state management
practices relating to point-source discharge reduction and non-point
source pollution abatement in lake watersheds.
ANALYTIC APPROACH
The mathematical and statistical procedures selected for the
Survey's eutrophication analysis are based on related concepts that:
a. A generalized representation or model relating
sources, concentrations, and impacts can be constructed.
b. By applying measurements of relevant parameters
associated with lake degradation, the generalized model
can be transformed into an operational representation of
a lake, its drainage basin, and related nutrients.
c. With such a transformation, an assessment of the
potential for eutrophication control can be made.
LAKE ANALYSIS
In this report, the first stage of evaluation of lake and water-
shed data collected from the study lake and its drainage basin is
documented. The report is formatted to provide state environmental
agencies with specific information for basin planning [§303(e)], water
quality criteria/standards review [§303(c)], clean lakes [§314(a,b)],
and water quality monitoring [§106 and §305(b)] activities mandated
by the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972.
-------
m
Beyond the single lake analysis, broader based correlations
between nutrient concentrations (and loading) and trophic condi-
tion are being made to advance the rationale and data base for
refinement of nutrient v/ater quality criteria for the Nation's
freshwater lakes. Likewise, multivariate evaluations for the
relationships between land use, nutrient export, and trophic
condition, by lake class or use, are being developed to assist
in the formulation of planning guidelines and policies by EPA
and to augment plans implementation by the states.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The staff of the National Eutrophication Survey (Office of
Research & Development, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency)
expresses sincere appreciation to the Kansas State Department of
Health and Environment for professional involvement, to the Kansas
National Guard for conducting the tributary sampling phase of
the Survey, and to those Kansas wastewater treatment plant opera-
tors who voluntarily provided effluent samples and flow data.
The staff of the Kansas Division of Environmental Health pro-
vided invaluable lake documentation and counsel during the Survey,
reviewed the preliminary reports, and provided critiques most use-
ful in the preparation of this Working Paper series.
Major General Edward R. Fry, the Adjutant General of Kansas,
and Project Officer Colonel Albin L. Lundquist, who directed the
volunteer efforts of the Kansas National Guardsmen, are also grate-
fully acknowledged for their assistance to the Survey.
-------
IV
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
STUDY RESERVOIRS
/
STATE OF KANSAS
NAME COUNTY
Cedar Bluff Trego
Council Grove Morris
Elk City • Montgomery
Fall River Greenwood
John Redmond Coffey, Lyon
Kanopolis Ellsworth
Marion • Marion
Melvern Osage
Mil ford Clay, Geary
Nprton Norton
Perry Jefferson
Pomona Osage
Toronto Greenwood, Woodson
Tuttle Creek Marshall, Potta-
watomie, Riley
Wilson Russell
-------
I 'i
-------
WILSON RESERVOIR
STORE! NO. 2015
I. CONCLUSIONS
A. Trophic Condition:
Survey data indicate that Wilson Reservoir is mesotrophic.
It ranked second in overall trophic quality among the 15 Kansas
reservoirs sampled in 1974 when compared using a combination of
six water quality parameters*. One of the reservoirs had less
median total phosphorus, one had less and one had the same median
dissolved orthophosphorus, two had less and one had the same
median inorganic nitrogen, six had less mean chlorophyll a_, and
none of the other reservoirs had greater mean Secchi disc trans-
parency. Depression of dissolved oxygen with depth occurred at
sampling stations 2 and 3 in June.
Survey limnologists did not observe macrophytes or surface
concentrations of algae during sampling visits.
B. Rate-Limiting Nutrient:
The algal assay results indicate that Wilson Reservoir was
phosphorus limited at the time the sample was collected (04/12/74),
The reservoir data indicate phosphorus limitation at all sampling
stations and times.
* See Appendix A.
-------
C. Nutrient Controllability:
1. Point Sources—During the sampling year, the listed
point sources accounted for an estimated 22.1% of the total
phosphorus input to Wilson Reservoir. The wastewater treatment
plant at Plainville contributed 16.7%, the plant at Natoma
contributed 3.9%, and the plant at Bunker Hill contributed 1.6%
of the total.
The present phosphorus loading of 0.47 g/m2/year is nearly
1.4 times that proposed by Vollenweider (Vollenweider and Dillon,
1974) as a eutrophic loading (see page 13). Continuation of this
loading may increase primary productivity and eventually cause
the reservoir to become eutrophic. Because the water-body is
phosphorus limited, point-source phosphorus should be reduced to
the greatest practicable extent to at least slow the present
rate of enrichment.
2. Non-point sources--Non-point sources contributed 77.8%
of the total phosphorus load during the sampling year. The Saline
River contributed 62.7%, Cedar Creek contributed 0.7%, and Para-
dise Creek contributed 0.3%. The ungaged minor tributaries and
immediate drainage contributed an estimated 10.4%.
The phosphorus export rates of the three tributaries were
quite low (3 kg/km2/yr and less; see page 12).
-------
II. RESERVOIR AND DRAINAGE BASIN CHARACTERISTICS"1"
A. Morphometry :
1. Surface area: 36.42 kilometers2.
2. Mean depth: 8.4 meters.
3. Maximum depth: >16.8 meters.
4. Volume: 305.908 x 106 m3.
5. Mean hydraulic retention time: 2.8 years (based on outflow)
B. Tributary and Outlet:
(See Appendix C for flow data)
1. Tributaries -
Drainage Mean flow
Name area (km2)* (m3/sec)*^
Saline River 3,890,2 3.440
Cedar Creek 71.0 0.074
Paradise Creek 595.7 0.600
Minor tributaries &
immediate drainage - 371.7 1.030
Totals 4,928.6 5.144
2. Outlet -
Saline River 4,965.0** 3.490
C. Precipitation***:
1. Year of sampling: 40.7 centimeters.
2. Mean annual: 68.0 centimeters.
t Table of metric conversions—Appendix B.
ft Kring, 1977.
* For limits of accuracy, see Working Paper No. 175, "...Survey Methods,
1973-1976".
** Includes area of reservoir.
*** See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
III. WATER QUALITY SUMMARY
Wilson Reservoir was sampled three times during the open-water season
of 1974 by means of a pontoon-equipped Huey helicopter. Each time,
samples for physical and chemical parameters were collected from a number
of depths at three stations on the reservoir (see map, page v). During
each visit, a single depth-integrated (4.6 m to surface) sample was
composited from the stations for phytoplankton identification and
enumeration; and during the first visit, a single 18.9-liter depth-
integrated sample was composited for algal assays. Also each time,
a depth-integrated sample was collected from each of the stations for
chlorophyll a^ analysis. The maximum depths sampled were 16.8 meters
at station 1, 15.2 meters at station 2, and 12.2 meters at station 3.
The sampling results are presented in full in Appendix D and are
summarized in the following table (the June nutrient samples were not
preserved properly and were not analyzed).
-------
A. SUMMARY OF PHYSICAL AND
CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS FOH WILSON RESERVOI*
STCMET COOE 2015
PARAMETER
TEMP (C)
DISS OXY (MG/L)
CNOCTVY (MCROMO)
PH (STAND UNITSI
TOT ALK (MG/L)
TOT P (MG/L>
ORTH.O P (MG/L)
N02«N03 (MG/L)
AMMONIA (MG/L)
KJEL N (MG/L)
INORG N (MG/L)
TOTAL N (MG/L)
CHLRPYL A (UG/L)
SECCHI (METERS)
1ST SAMPLING ( 4/12/74)
9.2
9.6
1598.
8.0
154.
0.021
0.004
0.300
0.040
0 .500
0.350
O.POO
5.0
0.5
3
RANGE
- 10.5
- 10.2
- 1704.
8.2
~ 180.
- 0.070
- 0.027
- 1.230
- 0.070
- 0.90C
- 1.270
- 1.830
- 11.8
0.8
SITES
MEAN
9.7
10.0
1635.
8.2
1 £. "7
167.
0.030
0.008
0.427
0.051
0.60?
0.478
1.03*-
7.3
0.7
MEDIAN
9.5
10.0
1607.
8.2
• f O
162.
0.025
0.006
0.315
0.050
0.600
0.370
0.970
5.0
0.8
2NU SAMPLING ( 6/26/74)
3 SITES
RANGE MEAN
20.6 - 24.1 22.7
1.6 - 8.0 6.0
209. - 226. 219.
MEDIAN
23.0
6.8
221.
7.9 - 8.* 8.3 S.t
.*«... .«^»««««..o<
,*»....
oooooo -intoooooooooooooooooooo
oooooo _ooooooaaooeoeoo<
>eooooo
oooooo _eeoooooooot>ooooooooooo
oooooo _aoooooeooooaoeoooooooa
0.8 - 2.5 1.7
2.0 - 2.8 2.5
1.9
2.7
MEAN MEDIAN
17.0 17.2
8.4
908.
8.0
135.
0.540 - 1.020
15.9 - 19.4
0.9 - 1.1
8.4
215.
8.0
137.
3Kii SAMPLING (10/ 1/74)
3 SITES
RANGE
16.2 - 17.H
7.8 - 9.0
210. - 2171.
7.8 - 8.3
127. - 141.
0.017 - 0.027 0.021 0.020
0.002 - 0.011 0.004 0.004
0.040 - 0.220 0.139 0.170
0.020 - 0.080 0.034 0.030
0.500 - 0.800 0.607 0.600
0.070 - 0.300 0.174 0.205
0.746 0.730
17.6 17.5
1.0 1.1
-------
B. Biological Characteristics:
1. Phytoplankton -
Sampli ng
Date
04/12/74
06/26/74
10/01/74
Dominant
Genera
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1.
2.
3.
4.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Synedra sp.
Chroomonas sp.
Stephanodiscus sp.
Qocystis sp.
Ankistrodesmus sp.
Other genera
Total
Chroomonas sp.
Cryptomonas sp.
Oocystis sp.
Sphaerocystis sp.
Total
Stephanodiscus sp.
Oscillatoria sp.
Synedra sp.
Oocystis sp.
Dactylococcopsis sp.
Other genera
Algal Units
per ml
3,438
1,413
1,130
1,083
659
1,460
9,183
575
157
52
52
1,
1,
836
,847
203
601
258
129
516
Total
4,554
-------
2. Chlorophyll
Sampli ng
Date
04/12/74
06/26/74
10/01/74
Station
Number
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
Chlorophyll
(yg/D
5.0
5.0
11.8
0.8
2.5
1.9
19.4
15.9
17.5
C. Limiting Nutrient Study:
1. Autoclaved, filtered, and nutrient spiked -
Ortho P
Cone, (mg/1)
Inorganic N Maximum yield
Cone, (mg/1) (mg/1-dry wt.)
<0.005
<0.055
<0.055
<0.005
0.285
0.285
1.285
1.285
0.1
6.8
14.1
0.1
Spike (mg/1)
Control
0.050 P
0.050 P + 1.0 N
1.0 N
2. Discussion -
The control yield of the assay alga, Selenastrum capri-
cornutum, indicates that the potential primary productivity
of Wilson Reservoir was low at the time the sample was col-
lected (04/12/74). Also, the increase in yield with the
addition of phosphorus alone indicates that the reservoir
was phosphorus limited at that time. Note that the addition
-------
8
of nitrogen alone resulted in a yield no greater than that
of the control.
The reservoir data indicate phosphorus limitation as well,
The mean inorganic nitrogen/orthophosphorus ratios were 30/1
or greater at all sampling stations and times, and phosphorus
limitation would be expected.
-------
IV. NUTRIENT LOADINGS
(See Appendix E for data)
For the determination of nutrient loadings, the Kansas National
Guard collected monthly near-surface grab samples from each of the
tributary sites indicated on the map (page v), except for the months
of May, June, and July when two samples were collected. Sampling was
begun in October, 1974, and was completed in September, 1975.
Through an interagency agreement, stream flow estimates for the
year of sampling and a "normalized" or average year were provided by
the Kansas District Office of the U.S. Geological Survey for the
tributary sites nearest the reservoir.
In this report, nutrient loads for sampled tributaries were
calculated using mean annual concentrations and mean annual flows.
Nutrient loads shown are those measured minus point-source loads,
if any.
Nutrient loads for unsampled "minor tributaries and immediate
drainage" ("ZZ" of U.S.G.S.) were estimated using the mean concen-
trations in Cedar Creek at station B-l and the mean annual ZZ flow.
The operator of the Plainville wastewater treatment plant pro-
vided monthly effluent samples; however, flows appear to be estimates.
The operator of the Natona wastewater treatment plant also provided
monthly samples but flows were not available. Therefore, nutrient
loads from these sources and those from the wastewater treatment plant
-------
10
at Bunker Hill, which was not sampled, were estimated at 1.134 kg P and
3.401 kg N/capita/year; and flows were estimated at 0.3785 m3/capita/day.
A. Waste Sources:
1. Known municipal* -
Name
Plainville
Natoma
Bunker Hill
Pop.
Served
2,518
590
240
Treatment
tr. filter
tr. filter
stab, pond
Mean Flow
(mVd)
953.1
223.3
90.8
Receiving
Water
Trib. of Para-
dise Creek
Paradise Creek
Unnamed Trib./
Wilson Reser-
voir
2. Known industrial - None
* Treatment plant questionnaires; Anonymous, 1971.
-------
11
B. Annual Total Phosphorus Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
kg P/ % of
Source yr total
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
Saline River 10,740 62.7
Cedar Creek 130 0.7
Paradise Creek 50 0.3
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non-point load) - 1,785 10.4
c. Known municipal STP's -
Bunker Hill 270 1.6
Natoma 670 3.9
Plainville 2,855 16.7
d. Septic tanks - Unknown ?
e. Known industrial - None
f. Direct precipitation* - 635 3.7
Total 17,135 100.0
2. Outputs -
Lake outlet - Saline River 5,065
3. Net annual P accumulation - 12,070 kg.
* See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
12
C. Annual Total Nitrogen Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
kg N/
Source yr
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
Saline River 134,305
Cedar Creek 4,950
Paradise Creek 31,190
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non-point load) - 68,895
c. Known municipal STP's -
Bunker Hill
Na toma
Plainville
815
2,005
8,565
d. Septic tanks - Unknown ?
e. Known industrial - None
f. Direct precipitation* - 39,320
Total 290,045
2. Outputs -
Lake outlet - Saline River 160,140
3. Net annual N accumulation - 129,905 kg.
D. Non-point Nutrient Export by Subdrainage Area:
Tributary kg P/km2/yr
Saline River
Cedar Creek
Paradise Creek
3
2
% of
total
46.3
1.7
10.7
23.7
0.3
0.7
3.0
13.6
100.0
kg N/km2/yr
35
70
52
* See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
13
E. Yearly Loads:
In the following table, the existing phosphorus loadings
are compared to those proposed by Vollenweider (Vollenweider
and Dillon, 1974). Essentially, his "dangerous" loading is
one at which the receiving water would become eutrophic or
remain eutrophic; his "permissible" loading is that which
would result in the receiving water remaining oligotrophic
or becoming oligotrophic if morphometry permitted. A meso-
trophic loading would be considered one between "dangerous"
and "permissible".
Note that Vollenweider's model may not be applicable to
water bodies with short hydraulic retention times.
Total Phosphorus Total Nitrogen
Total Accumulated Total Accumulated
grams/m2/yr 0.47 0.33 8.0 3.6
Vollenweider phosphorus loadings
(g/m2/yr) based on mean depth and mean
hydraulic retention time of Wilson Reservoir:
"Dangerous" (eutrophic loading) 0.34
"Permissible" (oligotrophic loading) 0.17
-------
14
V. LITERATURE REVIEWED
Anonymous, 1971. Inventory of municipal waste facilities. EPA
Publ. OWP-1, vol. 7, Wash., DC.
Kring, R. Lynn, 1977. Personal communication (revised reservoir
morphometry). KS Dept. of Health & Environment, Topeka.
Vollenweider, R. A., and P. J. Dillon, 1974. The application of
the phosphorus loading concept to eutrophication research.
Natl. Res. Council of Canada Publ. No. 13690, Canada Centre
for Inland Waters, Burlington, Ontario.
-------
15
VI. APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
LAKE RANKINGS
-------
LAKE DATA TO BE USED IN RANKINGS
LAKE
CODE LAKE NAME
2001 CEDAR BLUFF RESERVOIR
2002 COUNCIL GROVE
2003 ELK CITY
2004 FALL RIVER RESERVOIR
2005 JOHN REDMOND RESERVOIR
2006 KANOPOLIS RESERVOIR
2007 . MARION RESERVOIR
2008 MELVERN RESERVOIR
2009 MILFORD RESERVOIR
2010 NORTON RESERVOIR
2011 PERRY RESERVOIR
2012 POMONA RESERVOIR
2013 TORONTO RESERVOIR
2014 TUTTLE CREEK RESERVOIR
2015 WILSON RESERVOIR
NKINGS
MEDIAN
TOTAL P
B 0.017
0.069
0.030
0.053
IR 0.118
0.056
0.052
0.034
0.079
0.122
0.055
0.040
0.067
IR 0.162
0.023
MEDIAN
INORO N
0.055
0.830
0.590
0.470
1.250
0.640
0.430
0.265
0.710
0.110
0.970
1.240
0.425
0.970
0.265
500-
MEAN SEC
431.667
485.889
490.400
488.667
492.667
487.000
483.667
459.111
466.333
476.750
478.571
481.333
438.500
470.667
445.222
MEAN
CHLORA
4.217
9.789
3.212
7.683
9.467
16.033
12.400
30.400
18.883
21.360
5.614
8.312
6.583
11.278
8.867
15-
MIN DO
10.800
10.400
14.000
9.200
8.200
10.200
9.000
14.400
12.300
8.000
13.400
13.000
13.000
13.600
13.400
MEDIAN
DIS5 ORTriO P
0.004
0.028
0.003
0.016
0.066
0.011
0.010
0.007
0.036
0.036
0.017
0.021
0.011
0.067
0.004
-------
LAKES RANKED 3Y INDEX NOS.
SANK LAKE CODE LAKE NAME
1 2001
2 2015
3 2007
4 2003
5 2004
6 2008
7 2013
8 2010
9 2011
1C 2006
11 2012
12 2002
13 2009
14 2005
15 2014
CEDAR BLUFF RESERVOIR
WILSON RESERVOIR
MARION RESERVOIR
ELK CITY
FALL RIVER RESERVOIR
MELVERN RESERVOIR
TORONTO RESERVOIR
NORTON RESERVOIR
PERRY RESERVOIR
KANOPOLIS RESERVOIR
POMONA RESERVOIR
COUNCIL GROVE
MILFORD RESERVOIR
JOHN REDMOND RESERVOIR
TUTTLE CREEK RESERVOIR
INDEX NO
539
439
357
350
328
326
303
292
279.
271
267
230
214
164
139
-------
PERCENT OF LAKES WITH HIGHER VALUES (NUMBER OF LAKES WITH HIGHER VALUES)
LAKE
CODE LAKE NAME
2001 CEDAR BLUFF RESERVOIR
2002 COUNCIL GROVE
2003 ELK CITY
2004 FALL RIVER RESERVOIR
2005 JOHN REDMOND RESERVOIR
2006 KANOPOLIS RESERVOIR
2007 MARION RESERVOIR
200B MELVERN RESERVOIR
2009 MILFORD RESERVOIR
2010 NORTON RESERVOIR
2011 PERRY RESERVOIR
2012 POMONA RESERVOIR
2013 TORONTO RESERVOIR
2014 TUTTLE CREEK RESERVOIR
2015 WILSON RESERVOIR
MEDIAN
TOTAL'P
100 (
29 1
86 (
57 <
14 1
43 1
64 -1
79 1
21 (
7 1
50 1
71 <
36 (
0 '
93 i
: 14)
: 4)
: 12)
; 8)
I 2)
[ 6)
[ 9)
[ 11)
[ 3)
: i>
( 7)
! 10)
! 5)
( 0)
( 13)
MEDIAN
INORG N
100 <
29 1
50 1
57 1
0 1
43 1
64 1
82 I
36 1
93 1
18 <
.7 1
71 i
18 '
82 i
I 14)
: 4)
! 7)
: a)
! 0)
1 6)
1 9)
[ 11)
! 5)
[ 13)
I 2)
t 1)
( 10)
t 2)
( 11)
500-
MEAN SEC
100 (
36 (
7 (
14 (
0 I
29 1
43 1
86 1
79 (
64 (
57 1
50 1
21 1
71 I
93 1
1 14)
: 5)
: i)
: 2)
: o)
: 4)
! 6)
! 12)
: ID
: 9)
: 8)
! 7)
; 3)
t 10)
I 13)
MEAN
CHLORA
93 1
43 (
100 (
71 (
50 1
21 1
29 1
0 1
14 1
7 1
86 1
64 1
79 I
36 (
57 I
: 13)
: 6)
: 14)
; 10)
: 7)
; 3)
[ 4)
I 0)
: 2)
: i)
I 12)
I 9)
I 11)
( 5)
1 8)
15-
MIN DO
57 (
64 <
7 (
79 (
93 (
71 1
86 1
0 1
50 <
100 1
25 (
39 1
39 I
14 1
25 l
: 8)
: 9)
: i)
; ID
: 13)
: io>
; 12)
; o)
; 7)
: 14)
: 3)
[ 5)
[ 5)
I 2)
I 3)
MEDIAN
DISS'ORTHO P
89 (
29 <
100 (
50 (
7 1
64 1
71 1
79 1
14 1
21 1
43 1
36 I
57 1
0 <
89 I
; 12)
: 4)
; 14)
; 7)
: i)
: 9)
: io>
: ID
: 2)
[ 3)
: 6)
: 5)
[ 8)
[ 0)
I 12)
INDEX
NO
539
230
350
328
164
271
' 357
326
214
292
279
267
303
139
439
-------
APPENDIX B
CONVERSION FACTORS
-------
CONVERSION FACTORS
Hectares x 2.471 = acres
Kilometers x 0.6214 = miles
Meters x 3.281 = feet
Cubic meters x 8.107 x 10"4 = acre/feet
Square kilometers x 0.3861 = square miles
Cubic meters/sec x 35.315 = cubic feet/sec
Centimeters x 0.3937 = inches
«
Kilograms x 2.205 = pounds
Kilograms/square kilometer x 5.711 = Ibs/square mile
-------
APPENDIX C
TRIBUTARY FLOW DATA
-------
TRIBUTARY FLOW INFORMATION FOR KANSAS
05/03/76
LAKE CODE 2015
WILSON
TOTAL DRAINAGE APEA OF LAKE(SO KM)
SU9-DPAINAGE
TRIBUTARY A»EA(SO KM)
JAN
FES
4965.0
MAP
APR
NORMALIZED FLOWS(CMS)
JUN JUL AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
DEC
MEAN
2015A1
2015A2
2015bi
2015E1
2015ZZ
4965.0
3890.2
71.0
595.7
408.2
1.96
1.10
0.024
C.18
0.28
2.38
2.04
0.037
0.28
0.4?
2.83
2.63
0.088
0.57
0.92
4.25
2.49
0.059
0.51
0.74
5.66
3.68
0.133
1.02
2.01
6.23
9.06
0.153
1.47
2.32
5.95
6.51
0.181
1.36
1.81
4.81
4.53
0.057
0.54
1.36
2.83
3.40
0.045
0.45
1.08
1.47
3.11
0.057
0.45
0.74
1.64
1.47
0.020
0.19
0.42
1.81
1.13
0.027
0.19
0.31
3.49
3.44
0.074
O.bO
1.03
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA OF LAKE = 4965.0
SUM OF SUB-DRAINAGE AREAS = 4965.0
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS(CMS)
TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAH MEAN FLOW DAY
2015A1
FLO* DAY
2015A2
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
74
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
74
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
SUMMARY
TOTAL FLOW IN = 61.58
TOTAL FLOW OUT = 41.85
FLOW DAY
FLOW
0.365
0.283
0.226
0.212
0.810
1.543
0.575
0.578
7.306
14.357
7.985
0.501
0.583
1.073
1.002
1.068
1.008
1.116
1.320
0.980
6.881
1.110
6.060
0.830
12
10
15
12
8
8
13
11
14
13
30
13
12
10
15
12
8
8
13
11
14
13
30
13
0.340
0.283
0.224
0.212
0.224
0.623
0.595
0.595 24
12.573 29
12.176 26
0.566
0.538
0.481
1.189 .
1.019
1.189
1.189
1.133
1.246
0.963 24
4.474 29
1.076 26
1.416
0.736
0.538
12.714
3.964
0.708
3.625
0.623
-------
TRIBUTARY FLO* INFORMATION FOR KANSAS
05/03/76
LAKE CODE 2015
WILSON
MEAN MONTHLY FLO«'S AND DAILY
TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAR MEAN FLOW
2015E1
2015ZZ
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
74
7
-------
APPENDIX D
PHYSICAL and CHEMICAL DATA
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 76/05/03
DATE
FROM
TO
74/04/12
74/06/36
74/10/01
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
10 35 0000
10 35 0005
10 35 0015
10 35 0055
11 ?5 0000
11 ?5 0005
11 25 0015
11 25 0025
11 25 0040
11 25 00<*5
11 25 0055
10 00 0000
10 00 0005
10 00 0015
10 00 0040
10 00 0045
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
9.5
9.5
9.5
9.5
24.1
2<*.l
24.1
24.0
22.1
21.3
20.8
17.3
17.3
17.2
17.2
17.2
201501
38 57 30.0 098 29 55.0 4
*ILSON RESERVOIR
20J67 KANSAS
0911V1
11EPALES 2111202
0060 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00300
DO
MG/L
10.0
10.0
9.8
7.8
7.8
8.0
6.0
5.8
5.2
4.6
8.0
8.0
8.0
7.8
7.8
00077
TRANSP
SECCHI
INCHES
30
110
36
00094
CNOUCTVY
FIELD
MICROMHO
1607
1607
1607
1609
225
226
226
225
215
211
209
213
213
213
210
210
00400
PH
SU
8.20
8.20
8.20
8.00
8.40
8.4C
8.40
8.40
8.30
8.2C
8.2C
7.80
7.80
7.80
7.80
7.90
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
163
161
162
154
141
139
139
139
139
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.060
0.050
0.050
0.040
0.080
0.020K
0.030
0.020
0.030
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.900
0.700
0.600
0.600
0.800
0.600
0.600
0.500
0.500
00630
N02&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.320
0.300
0.300
1.230
0.220
0.200
0.200
0.200
0.200
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.011
0.006
0.007
0.027
0.004
0.002
0.004
0.004
0.006
DATE
FROM
TO
74/04/12
74/06/26
74/10/01
00665 32217 00031
TIME DEPTH PHOS-TOT CHLRPHYL INCDT LT
OF A REMNING
DAY FEET
10
10
10
10
11
10
10
10
10
10
10
35
35
35
35
25
00
00
00
00
00
00
0000
0005
0015
0055
0000
0000
0003
0005
0015
0040
0045
MG/L P UG/L PERCENT
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.025 5.0
.021
.023
.070
0.8
.025 19.4
1.0
.OH
.019
.017
.02*
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/05/03
201502
38 55 30.0 096 31
WILSON RESERVOIR
20167 KANSAS
34.0 4
091191
11EPALES 2111202
0050 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
DATE
FROM
TO
74/04/12
74/06/26
74/10/01
DATE
FROM
TO
74/04/12
74/06/26
74/10/01
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
10 55 0000
1C 55 0005
10 55 0015
10 55 0050
11 00 0000
11 00 0005
11 00 0015
11 00 0025
11 00 0035
11 00 0045
10 30 0000
10 30 0005
10 30 0015
10 30 0035
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
10 55 0000
10 55 0005
10 55 0015
10 55 0050
11 00 0000
10 30 0000
10 30 0005
10 30 0015
10 30 0035
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
9.3
9.3
9.2
9.2
23.1
23.1
22.9
22.5
20.8
20.6
17.4
17.4
17.4
17.2
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.022
0.021
0.025
0.026
0.020
0.020
0.020
0.0 If
00300
DO
MG/L
10.
10.
10.
7.
7.
7.
6.
4.
3.
9.
B.
8.
8.
32217
0
2
2
2
6
8
6
0
8
0
8
4
4
CHLRPHYL
A .
UG/L
5.
2.
IS.
0
5
9
00077
TRANSP
SECCHI
INCHES
30
105
42
00031
INCOT LT
REMNING
PERCENT
00094
CNDUCTVY
FIELD
MICROMHO
1600
1598
1599
1598
220
221
220
218
209
209
214
215
215
214
00400
PH
su
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
ti.
8.
20
20
20
20
40
4C
40
40
00
1C
20
30
30
30
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
162
162
162
161
137
137
136
138
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.050
0.050
0.050
0.060
0.030
0.030
0.020
0.040
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.600
0.600
0.500
0.500
0.700
0.700
0.600
0.500
00630 00671
N02&N03 PnOS-DIS
N-TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L MG/L P
0.310
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.170
0.18U
0.170
0.170
0.005
0.004
0.006
0.007
0.004
0.011
0.006
0.003
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/05/03
301503
38 56 40.0 098 35 30.0 4
WILSON RESERVOIR
201b7 KANSAS
0911^1
11EPALES 2111202
0038 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
DATE TIME DEPTH
FROM OF
TO DAY FEET
74/04/12 11 25 0000
11 25 0005
11 25 0015
11 25 0030
74/06/26 10 30 0000
10 30 0005
10 30 0015
10 30 0025
10 30 0035
74/10/01 11 00 0000
11 00 0005
11 00 0015
11 00 0030
11 00 0040
DATE TIME DEPTH
FROM OF
TO DAY FEET
74/04/12 11 25 0000
11 25 0005
11 25 0015
11 25 0030
74/06/26 10 30 0000
74/10/01 11 00 0000
11 00 0005
11 00 0015
11 00 0025
11 00 0030
11 00 0040
00010
*ATER
TEMP
CENT
10.5
10.5
10.4
10.4
23.9
23.9
23.7
23.0
21.3
16.6
16.6
16.4
16.3
16.2
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.028
0.025
0.028
0.049
0.023
0.023
0.022
0.027
0.021
00300 00077 00094
DO TRANSP CNDUCTVY
SECCHl FIELD
MG/L INCHES MICROMHO
18
9.8
9.6
10.0
2.6 80
7.8
7.0
5.4
1.6
9.0 42
9.0
8.8
8.4
8.4
32217 00031
CHLRPHYL INCDT LT
A REMNING
UG/L PERCENT
11.8
1.9
17.5
1.0
1704
1703
1695
1695
223
226
221
221
217
2170
2171
2147
2133
2171
00400 00410 00610 00625 00630 00671
PH T ALK NH3-N TOT KJEL N02&N03 PHOS-OIS
CAC03 TOTAL N N-TOTAL ORThO
SU MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P
8.20
8.20
8.20
8.2C
8.4C
8.40
8.30
8.20
7.90
8.03
8.03
7.98
7.95
7.95
179 0.040 0.600 0.450 0.004
180 0.040 0.500 0.440 0.004
180 0.050 0.600 0.450 0.007
173 0.070 0.600 0.430 0.008
131 0.030 0.700 0.060 0.003
131 0.050 0.600 0.060 0.003
129 0.030 0.600 0.040 0.004
129 0.040 0.600 0.040 0.002K
127 0.030 0.500 0.040 0.002
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
APPENDIX E
TRIBUTARY AND WASTEWATER
TREATMENT PLANT DATA
-------
ijlUHtl NtlKltVAL. UMiL
DATE TIME DEPTH
FROM OF
TO DAY FEET
74/10/12
74/11/10
74/12/15
75/01/12
75/03/08
75/04/13
75/05/11
75/05/24
75/06/14
75/06/29
75/07/13
75/07/26
75/08/30
75/09/13
10 09
12 39
11 45
10 07
11 14
15 20
16 40
16 ?5
14 40
16 49
14 30
14 00
11 00
2015A1
38 59 30.0 098 28 05.0 4
SALINE RIVER
20 7.5 WILSON NW
O/WILSON RESERVOIR 091191
BRDG ON DIRT RD 2.5 Ml NE OF rtlLSON DAM
IIE'PALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
0630
'^N03
OTAL
IG/L
0.336
0.336
0.400
0.384
0.236
0.180
0.135
0.160
0.115
0.130
0.170
0.195
0.125
0.125
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
1.300
1.700
1.200
3.500
1.350
1.000
0.850
1.200
0.750
0.850
0.837
1.500
0.600
0.700
00610
NH1-N
TOTAL
MG/L
O.C90
0.150
0.100
0.096
0.136
0.050
0.140
0.145
0.075
0.080
0.040
0.190
0.085
0.080
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.010
0.010
0.005
0.008
0.016
0.005
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.010
0.005
0.015
0.010
0.015
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.045
0.040
0.030
0.030
0.070
0.030
0.060
0.100
0.040
0.030
0.030
0.060
0.030
0.050
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/05/04
2015A2
38 58 00.0 098 51 20.0 4
SALINE RIVER
20 7.5 RUSSELL
T/WILSON RESERVOIR 091191
SRDG ON US ST 87 4 MI N OF RUSSELL
11EPALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
DATE
FROM OF
TO DAV
TIME DEPTH
FEET
74/10/12
74/11/10
74/12/15
75/03/08
75/04/13
75/05/11
75/05/24
75/06/14
75/06/29
75/07/13
75/07/26
75/08/30
75/09/13
08 55
10 54
10 00
09 36
13 32
10 35
15 04
13 15
16 04
13 30
15 40
13 00
09 15
00630
N02&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.248
0.448
0.736
0.371
0.160
0.110
0.115
0.145
0.005
0.005
0.010
0.100
0.095
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
1.200
1.700
0.500
1.600
1.350
0.700
0.950
1.750
1.150
0.600
0.950
0.500
0.600
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.055
0.065
0.057
0.040
0.050
0.015
0.027
0.110
0.025
0.020
0.035
0.020
0.035
00671
PHOS-OIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.005K
0.010
0.005K
0.008K
0.005K
0.005
0.010
0.060
0.025
0.010
0.010
0.015
0.015
00665-
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.030
0.050
0.040
0.020
0.070
0.060
0.120
0.440
0.210
0.070
0.080
0.040
0.060
K VALUE KNOWN TO 8E
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 76/05/04
2015B1
38 56 20.0 098 42 50.0 4
CEDAR CREEK
20 7.5 DORRANCE Nn
T/*,ILSON ..RESERVOIR 091191
dRDG ON RD 47 5 MI N OF HUNKER HILL
11EPALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
DATE
FROM
TO
74/10/12
74/11/10
74/12/15
75/03/08
75/04/13
75/05/11
75/05/24
75/06/14
75/06/29
75/07/13
75/07/26
75/08/30
75/09/13
00630 00625
TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TOTAL N
DAY FEET
11
11
11
10
14
11
15
13
17
15
09
14
11
55
55
00
40
19
34
40
55
15
00
30
30
30
MG/L
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.368
.080
.760
.625
.160
.470
.330
.570
.600
.830
.470
.960
.940
MG/L
1.
2.
1.
0.
0.
1.
1.
0.
0.
1.
2.
0.
900
400
100
750
600
250
700
900
550
000
400
900
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PHOS-DIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
040
065
130
048
030
115
080
045
025
113
035
040
MG/L P
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.005
.005K
.005
.008K
.005K
.010
.025
.030
.005K
.015
.027
MG/L P
0.040
0.010K
0.040
0.010K
0.080
0.110
0.060
0.110
0.020
0.060
0.060
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 76/05/04
DATE TIME DEPTH N02«>N03
FROM OF
TO DAY FEET
74/10/12
74/11/10
75/03/08
75/04/13
75/05/11
75/05/34
75/06/14
75/06/29
75/07/13
75/07/26
75/08/30
75/09/13
09 ?1
11 20
09 18
13 50
10 5?
15 21
13 32
16 16
13 45
15 30
13 20
09 30
201SE1
39 01 00.0 098 49 00.0 4
PARADISE CREEK
20 RUSSELL co MAP
T/wlLSON RESERVOIR 091191
tWDG ON LohT OTY RU 10 MI NE OF RUSSELL
11EPALES 211120*
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
0630
'«.N03
OTAL
G/L
0.032
0.208
0.177
0.050
0.055
0.015
0.530
0.520
0.010
0.005
0.025
0.010
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
2.400
3.150
1.100
1.700
0.450
1.200
2.300
4.700
3.000
1.850
1.700
1.300
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.075
0.130
O.C58
0.055
0.045
0.030
0.110
0.115
0.060
0.065
0.045
0.030
00671
PHOS-OIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.020
0.005
0.008K
0.005
0.015
0.010
0.145
0.190
0.025
0.025
0.030
0.030
00665
PhOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.035
0.195
0.030
0.080
0.040
0.070
0.610
0.540
0.170
0.150
0.190
0.110
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/05/04
DATE
FROM
TO
75/02/19
75/03/17
75/04/18
75/04/28
75/05/14
75/06/04
75/06/23
75/07/17
75/08/04
75/08/25
75/09/15
75/10/06
75/10/29
00630
TIME DEPTH N02&N03
OF N-TOTAL
DAY FEET
08
10
10
10
09
10
09
09
09
45
30
00
00
00
15
30
15
00
MG/L
7
20
18
15
7
15
25
15
13
7
15
2
21
.900
.800
.000
.800
.800
.800
.000
.000
.500
.500
.000
.200
.000
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
37.
5.
9.
10.
30.
15.
19.
6.
11.
15.
18.
35.
12.
000
600
800
500
000
500
000
900
400
500
500
500
000
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PHOS-DIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L
19
1
0
0
10
0
0
0
0
1
2
17
2
.300
.280
.220
.079
.500
.300
.042
.190
.082
.200
.400
.000
.700
MG/L P
1
4
5
2
0
1
3
1
1
1
4
1
5
.150
.000
.100
.200
.690
.150
.500
.130
.000
.880
.200
.850
.100
MG/L P
6.V50
7.400
5.800
5.700
a. 300
4.600
4.300
2.760
3.550
4.000
5.075
8.350
6.000
2015EA TF2015EA P000590
39 11 00.0 099 01 00.0 4
NATOMA
20 OSaORN CO
T/fclLSOKI KtS 091191
PARADISE CtfEE*
11EPALES 2141204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
50051 50053
FLO* CONDUIT
RATE FLO*-M6D
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/05/04
2015AA TF2015XA P002518
39 13 30.0 099 17 30.0 4
PLAINVILLE
20 ROOKS CO
T/WILSON «ES 091191
UNNAMED STREAM
11EPALES
2141204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
DATE
FROM
TO
75/02/11
75/03/11
75/04/11
75/05/11
75/06/11
75/07/10
75/08/11
75/09/11
75/10/10
75/11/10
75/12/10
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
10 00
09 00
09 00
10 00
09 00
09 00
09 30
09 00
09 30
08 30
08 30
00630
N02S.N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
17.950
10.100
5.100
12.500
11.500
10.500
13.800
8.900
9.400
16.800
16.800
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
l.OOOK
8.200
4.700
2.500
1.800
3.800
4.300
2.400
4.100
3.800
5.000
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.080K
0.080K
1.800
0.170
0.050K
0.230
0.075
0.660
0.075
0.190
00671
PHOS-OIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
8.300
6.100
0.530
1.800
7.600
0.350
7.900
7.000
8.750
6.100
15.000
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
8.300
8.100
10.000
10.500
9.600
9.200
7.000
9.600
9.400
IS. 000
50051
FLOW
RATE
INST MGD
0.516
0.524
0.540
0.540
0.530
0.530
0.504
0.519
0.508
0.520
0.005
50053
CONDUIT
FLOtf-MGD
MONTHLY
0.500
0.500
0.500
0.500
0.500
0.500
0.500
0.500
0.500
0.500
0.500
K VALUE KNOrfN TO d£
LESS THAN INDICATED
------- |