U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
WORKING PAPER SERIES
REPORT
ON
CLEARWATER LAKE
REYNOLDS AND WAYNE COUNTIES
MISSOURI
EPA REGION VII
WORKING PAPER No, 547
CORVALLIS ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY - CORVALLIS, OREGON
and
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING & SUPPORT LABORATORY - LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
699-440
-------
REPORT
ON
CLEARWATER LAKE
REYNOLDS AND WAYNE COIMIES
MISSOURI
EPA REGION VII
WORKING PAPER No, 547
WITH THE COOPERATION OF THE
flissouRi DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
AND THE
MISSOURI NATIONAL GUARD
FEBRUARY, 1977
-------
REPORT ON CLEARWATER LAKE
REYNOLDS AND WAYNE COUNTIES, MISSOURI
EPA REGION VII
by
National Eutrophication Survey
Water and Land Monitoring Branch
Monitoring Applications Laboratory
Environmental Monitoring & Support Laboratory
Las Vegas, Nevada
and
Eutrophication Survey Branch
Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory
Corvallis, Oregon
Working Paper No. 547
OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
February 1977
-------
CONTENTS
Page
Foreword i i
List of Missouri Study Lakes iv
Lake and Drainage Area Map v
Sections
I. Conclusions 1
II. Lake and Drainage Basin Characteristics 4
III. Lake Water Quality Summary 6
IV. Nutrient Loadings 11
V. Literature Reviewed 17
VI. Appendices .18
-------
11
FOREWORD
The National Eutrophication Survey was Initiated in 1972 in
response to an Administration commitment to investigate the nation-
wide threat of accelerated eutrophication to freshwater lakes and
reservoirs.
OBJECTIVES
The Survey was designed to develop, in conjunction with state
environmental agencies, information on nutrient sources, concen-
trations, and impact on selected freshwater lakes as a basis for
formulating comprehensive and coordinated national, regional, and
state management practices relating to point source discharge
reduction and nonpoint source pollution abatement in lake water-
sheds.
ANALYTIC APPROACH
The mathematical and statistical procedures selected for the
Survey's eutrophication analysis are based on related concepts
that:
a. A generalized representation or model relating
sources, concentrations, and impacts can be
constructed.
b. By applying measurements of relevant parameters
associated with lake degradation, the generalized
model can be transformed into an operational
representation of a lake, its drainage basin, and
related nutrients.
c. With such a transformation, an assessment of the
potential for eutrophication control can be made.
LAKE ANALYSIS
In this report, the first stage of evaluation of lake and
watershed data collected from the study lake and its drainage
basin is documented. The report is formatted to provide state
environmental agencies with specific information for basin
planning [§303(e)], water quality criteria/standards review
[§303(c;], clean lakes [§314(a,b)], and water quality monitoring
[§106 and §305(b)] activities mandated by the Federal Water
Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972.
-------
iii
Beyond the single lake analysis, broader based correlations
between nutrient concentrations (and loading) and trophic condition
are being made to advance the rationale and data base for refine-
ment of nutrient water quality criteria for the Nation's freshwater
lakes. Likewise, multlvariate evaluations for the relationships
between land use, nutrient export, and trophic condition, by lake
class or use, are being developed to assist 1n the formulation
of planning guidelines and policies by the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency and to augment plans implementation by the states.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The staff of the National Eutrophication Survey (Office of
Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency)
expresses sincere appreciation to the Missouri Department of Natural
Resources for professional involvement, to the Missouri National
Guard for conducting the tributary sampling phase of the Survey,
and to those Missouri wastewater treatment plant operators who
provided effluent samples and flow data.
The staff of the Missouri Department of Natural Resources,
James Wilson, Director; the Division of Environmental Quality,
Ken Karch, Director; and the Water Quality Program, James Odendahl,
Director, provided invaluable lake documentation and counsel during
the Survey, reviewed the preliminary reports and provided critiques
most useful in the preparation of this Working Paper series.
Major General Charles M. Kiefner, the Adjutant General of Missouri,
and Project Officer Captain Donald L. Well en, who directed the
volunteer efforts of the Missouri National Guardsmen, are also
gratefully acknowledged for their assistance to the Survey.
-------
IV
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
STUDY LAKES
STATE OF MISSOURI
LAKE NAME
Clearwater Lake
Pomme de Terre Reservoir
Stockton Reservoir
Lake Taneycomo
Thomas Hill Reservoir
Lake Wappapello
COUNTY
Reynolds
Polk, Hickory
Dade, Polk, Cedar
Taney
Macon, Randolph
Wayne, Butler
-------
CLEARWATER RESERVOIR^
Tributary Sampling Site
x Lake Sampling Site
Sewage Treatment Facility
Drainage Area Boundary
Land Subject to Inundation
-------
REPORT ON CLEARWATER LAKE, MISSOURI
STORE! NO. 2901
I. CONCLUSIONS
A. Trophic Condition:*
Based upon field observations and Survey data, Clear-
water Lake is considered mesotrophic. Chlorophyll a_ values
ranged from a low of 0.3 yg/1 in the spring to a high of
6.6 yg/1 in the fall with a mean of 3.6 yg/1. Secchi disc
visibility was high during the summer sampling period, but
low during spring and autumn. Of the six Missouri lakes sam-
pled in 1974, five had higher total phosphorus values, four had
higher inorganic nitrogen levels and four had higher ortho-
phosphorus values than Clearwater Lake.
Survey limnologists reported an algal bloom during
October sampling of the lake.
B. Rate-Limiting Nutrient:
Algal assay results indicate that Clearwater Lake was
limited by available phosphorus levels. Spikes with phosphorus
or nitrogen and phosphorus simultaneously resulted in increased
assay yields. Addition of nitrogen alone did not stimulate a
growth response. The ratios of available nitrogen to ortho-
phosphorus (N/P) in sampled waters further substantiate phos-
phorus limitation.
*See Appendix E.
-------
C. Nutrient Controllability:
1. Point sources -
Point sources contributed 16.5% of the total phosphorus
load to Clearwater Reservoir during the sampling year. The
city of Ellington contributed 11.5% of the total phosphorus
load, and the city of Annapolis was estimated to contribute
5.0%.
The calculated annual phosphorus loading for Clearwater
Reservoir of 1.16 g P/nr/yr is less than Vollenweider's (1975)
eutrophic loading for a lake with such volume and retention
time. However, loading calculations based upon available nu-
trient concentrations and flow data yield a net export of both
phosphorus and nitrogen from the reservoir, indicating sampling
was not adequate to depict actual loading and export rates.
This export could be attributable to unmeasured point sources
in the Clearwater watershed. The Missouri Department of Natural
Resources (manuscript) lists six industrial and mining point
sources which are significant sources of pollution, particularly
heavy metal and thermal, to Clearwater Reservoir. Additional
sampling is needed to determine the impact of these sources on
the nutrient budget of the reservoir before recommendations for
maintaining the high water quality in this lake can be made.
-------
2. Nonpoint sources -
The total phosphorus load from nonpoint sources (including
precipitation) accounted for 83.5% of the loading reaching the
lake. The Black River contributed 61.1% of the phosphorus
load, and ungaged tributaries were estimated to have contributed
10.6%.
The annual phosphorus exports of the tributaries to
Clearwater Lake are comparable to the export of Clark Creek,
2
an unimpacted tributary of nearby Lake Wappapello* (3 kg P/km /yr)
Working Paper No. 551
-------
'II. LAKE AND DRAINAGE BASIN CHARACTERISTICS
Lake and drainage basin characteristics are itemized below.
Lake morphometry data were provided by the Missouri Clean Water
Commission. Tributary flow data were provided by the Missouri
District Office of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). Outlet
drainage area includes the lake surface area. Mean hydraulic
retention time was obtained by dividing the lake volume by the
mean flow of the outlet. Precipitation values are estimated by
methods as outlined in National Eutrophication Survey (NES)
Working Paper No. 175. A table of metric/English conversions is
included as Appendix A.
A. Lake Morphometry:
2
1. Surface area: 6.60 km .
2. Mean depth: 4.1 meters.
3. Maximum depth: 14.6 meters.
4. Volume: 27.060 x 106 m3.
5. Mean hydraulic retention time: 13 days.
-------
B. Tributary and Outlet:
(See Appendix B for flow data)
1. Tributaries -
Drainage Mean flow
Name area(knr) (m-Vsec)
A-2 Black River 1,276.9 15.25
B-l Logan Creek 445.5 3.23
C-l Sinking Creek 191.7 1.25'
Minor tributaries and
immediate drainage - 405.2 4.33
Totals 2,319.3 24.06
2. Outlet - A-l Black River 2,325.8 24.00
C. Precipitation:
1. Year of sampling: 110.0 cm.
2. Mean annual: 107.5 cm.
-------
III. LAKE WATER QUALITY SUMMARY
Clearwater Lake was sampled three times during the open-
water season of 1974 by means of a pontoon-equipped Huey heli-
copter. Each time, samples for physical and chemical parameters
were collected from three stations on the lake and from a number
of depths at each station (see map, page v). During each visit,
depth-integrated samples were collected from each station for
chlorophyll a^ analysis and phytoplankton identification and enu-
meration. During the first and last visits, 18.9-liter depth-
integrated samples were composited for algal assays. Maximum
depths sampled were 11.9 meters at Station 01, 4.3 meters at
Station 02, and 6.4 meters at Station 03. For a more detailed
explanation of NES methods, see NES Working Paper No. 175.
The results obtained are presented in full in Appendix C and
are summarized in III-A for waters at the surface and at the maxi-
mum depth for each site. Results of the phytoplankton counts and
chlorophyll a^ determinations are included in III-B. Results of the
limiting nutrient study are presented in III-C.
-------
COOfc 2901
( 4/ 9/74 )
"AX
S*>**» = 3 DEPTn
AND CHEMICAL cnAhACTE»isTics
( 6/18/74 )
MAX
S«»« = 3 OEPT-i
( 10/ 8/7* )
S»o» = 3
MAA
PA^EU, .
TE'-Pt»ATUh-t (UEli
O.-l.S '« OEfTn
wax DEPTH***
GibSOLvtL; OXYGEN
O.-l.K M DEPTH
MAX DEPTH****
CONDUCTIVITY CJM
O.-l.S M DEPTH
MAX DEPTH****
t-H (ST AMDAHL) U\II
O.-l.S f HtPT-1
MAX DEPTH***
TOTAL ALKALINITY
O.-l.S M DEPT«
«AX DEPTH***
TOTAL P (MG/L)
O.-l.b M DEPTH
MAX OFPTH****
DISSOLVED U^THO
0.-1.5 M OE'PTH
MAX DEPTH****
NQ2»N03 (M(;/L)
n.-l .5 n uE"Tn
WAX OF.PTH»«
AMMONIA (M(i/L>
O.-l.S M DEPTH
MAX !JtPTn**»
K.JELOAHL ^ (M(,/L
O.-l.n M JEPTn
MAX DEPTH**0
N*
CENT)
6
3
<"!<.,/(_)
3
J
HU<)
6
3
VM
b
3
(MG/L)
b
3
b
*
P (MG/L)
5
3
b
3
5
3
)
3
3
->AN'3E
9.3- 12.2
9.2- 11.9
9.8- 10.6
10.0- 11.0
143.- 153.
142.- 153.
7.9- 7.9
7.9- 7.9
80.- 94.
78.- 98.
0.010-0.021
0.010-0.023
0.004-0.005
0.004-0.005
0.140-0.250
0.140-0.2^0
0.030-0.040
0.020-0.050
0.200-0.400
0.200-0.200
•MED I AN
11.5
11.3
10.0
10.0
145.
143.
7.9
7.9
36.
86.
0.017
0.01H
0.004
O.OOb
0.170
0.150
0.040
0.040
U.20U
0.200
(METEP5) N<*
0.0-
2.4-
0.6-
2.*-
0.0-
2.4-
0.0-
2.4-
0.0-
2.4-
0.0-
2.4-
0.0-
2.4-
0.0-
2.4-
0.0-
2.4-
0.0-
2.4-
l.b
9. ft
1.5
9.8
1.5
9.6
1.5
9.8
1.5
9.8
1.5
9.8
1.5
9.H
1.5
9.S
1.5
9.6
1.5
9.8
6
3
t,
3
6
3
b
3
6
3
6
3
6
3
6
3
6.
3
6
3
KANGE
22.8- 24.2
19.e- 22.0
9.0- 9.6
4.6- 8.2
197.- 203.
185.- 207.
6.4- 8.5
7.6- 8.0
o
H7.- 96.
96.- 110.
0.011-0.021
0.017-0.047
0.002-0.005
0.002-0.004
0.020-0.050
O.OHO-0.130
0.020-0.0*0
0.020-0.030
0.200-0.300
0.200-0.200
MEDIAN
23.6
20.5
9.0
6.3
202.
202.
8.4
7.6
97.
99.
0.015
0.018
0.003
0.00*
0.030
0.110
0.030
0.030
0.200
0.200
MANGE
0.0-
4.3-
0.0-
4.3-
0.0-
4.3-
0.0-
4.3-
0.0-
*.3-
0.0-
4.3-
0.0-
*.3-
0.0-
4.3-
0.0-
4.3-
0.0-
4.3-
1.5
11.9
1.5
11.9
1.5
11.9
1.5
11.9
1.5
11.9
1.5
11.9
1.5
11.9
1.5
11.9
l.S
11.9
1.5
11.9
6
3
6
3
6
3
6
3
6
3
6
3
6
3
6
3
6
3
6
3
HANGE
15.6- 17.3
13.6- 17.1
B.2- 9.0
7.4- «.*
207.- 217.
209.- 215.
7.7- 7.9
7.7- 7.9
124.- 129.
124.- 133.
0.012-0,029
0.015-0.05?
0.003-0.008
0.003-0.003
0.060-0.1*0
0.060-0.140
0.0*0-0.120
0.050-0.090
0.200-0.700
0.200-0.200
HA HOE
MEDIAN (METERS)
16.9
16. H
8.8
*.*
211.
211.
7.8
7.8
126.
126.
0.020
0.021
0.00*
0.003
0.090
0.090
0.055
0.050
0.200
0.200
0.0-
3.0-
0.0-
3.',-
0.0-
3.'.-
o.;-
3.1-
0.(-
3.1-
O.L-
3.1-
0 . 1--
3.l>-
0 . l.. -
3.0-
0.0-
3.0-
0.0-
3.6-
1.5
10. 7
1.5
10.7
1.5
10.7
1.5
10. 7
1.5
10.7
1.5
10.7
1.5
10.7
1.5
10.7
1.5
10.7
1.6
10.7
StCCHI DISC C'tTtKS)
O.b- l.S
0.9
1.8- 2.7 2.b
0.8- 1.0
O.b
« N = NO. OF
»» MAXIMUM UtfTH bMMHLtU AT EACh SITE
*** S = NO. OF SITES SAMPLED ON TnIS DATE
-------
B. Biological Characteristics:
1. Phytoplankton -
Sampling
Date
04/09/74
06/18/74
10/08/74
Dominant
Genera
1. Chroomonas
2. Nitzschia
3. Cryptomonas
4. Melosira
5. Cyclotella
Other genera
Total
1. Chroomonas
2. Synedra
3. Cryptomonas
4. Centric Diatom
5. Ankistrodesmus
Other genera
Total
1. Cryptomonas
2. Melosira
3. Coccoid cell
4. Peri dim'urn
5. Trachelotnonas
Other genera
Total
Algal
Units
per ml
266
222
177
177
133
45
1,020
428
238
190
95
48
190
1,189
165
165
55
55
55
495
-------
2. Chlorophyll a_ -
Sampling Station Chlorophyll
Date Number (yg/1 )
04/09/74 01 4.5
02 0.3
03 6.1
06/18/74 01 3.3
02 1.0
03 2.6
10/08/74 01 6.6
02 2.2
03 5.5
-------
10
Ortho P
Cone. (mg/1 )
<0.005
<0.055
<0.055
<0.005
Inorganic N
Cone. (mg/1 )
0.154
0.154
1.154
1.154'
Maximum Yield
(mg/1 -dry wt. )
0.1
3.7
15.3
0.1
C. Limiting Nutrient Study:
1. Autoclaved, filtered, and nutrient spiked - 04/09/74
Spike(mg/1)
Control
0.05 P
0.05 P + 1.0
1.00 N
2. Discussion -
The control yield of the assay alga, Selenastrum capri-
cornutum, indicates that the potential for primary production
in Clearwater Lake was low during the spring. Increased growth
of the test alga in response to an addition of orthophosphorus
indicates the lake was limited by available phosphorus. Spikes
with nitrogen alone did not stimulate a growth response.
The fall algal assay results are not considered reliable
because of a significant change in the nutrient levels between
the time the sample was collected and the assay begun.
The N/P ratios in sampled waters were 56/1 in the spring,
31/1 in the summer, and 40/1 in the fall, further suggesting
primary limitation by phosphorus (a mean N/P of 14/1 or greater
generally reflects phosphorus limitation).
-------
11
IV. NUTRIENT LOADINGS
(See Appendix D for data)
For the determination of nutrient loadings, the Missouri
National Guard collected monthly near-surface grab samples from
each of the tributary sites indicated on the map (page v), ex-
cept for the high runoff month of May when two samples were col-
lected. Sampling was begun in September 1974, and was completed
in August 1975.
Through an interagency agreement, stream flow estimates for
the year of sampling and a "normalized" or average year were pro-
vided by the Missouri District Office of the USGS for the tribu-
tary sites nearest the lake.
In this report, nutrient loads for sampled tributaries were
determined by using a modification of a USGS computer program for
calculating stream loadings. Nutrient loads indicated for tribu-
taries are those measured minus known point source loads, if any.
Nutrient loadings for unsampled "minor tributaries and imme-
diate drainage" ("II" of USGS) were estimated by using the mean
annual nutrient loads, in kg/km2/yr, in Sinking Creek at Station
o
C-l, and multiplying the means by the II area in km .
The operator of the Ellington wastewater treatment plant pro-
vided monthly effluent samples and corresponding flow data. Nutri-
ent loads for the city of Annapolis wastewater treatment plant were
estimated at 1.134 kg P and 3.401 kg N/capita/yr.
-------
12
A. Waste Sources:
1. Known municipal
Name
Ellington
Annapolis*
Population Mean Flow Receiving
Served Treatment (m^/d x 10-3) Water
1,100 Stabilization
pond
335 Stabilization
pond
0.893 Logan Creek
0.127** Black River
2. Known industrial - see discussion, page 2.
*U.S. EPA, 1971.
**Estimated at 0.3785 m3/capita/day.
-------
13
B. Annual Total Phosphorus Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
3 % Of
Source kg P/yr total
a. Tributaries (nonpoint load) -
A-2 Black River 4,680 61.1
B-l Logan Creek 410 5.3
C-l Sinking Creek 365 4.8
b. Minor tributaries and immediate
drainage (nonpoint load) - 810 10.6
c. Known municipal STP's -
Ellington 885 11.5
Annapolis 380 5.0
d. Septic tanks* - 15 0.2
e. Known industrial - see discussion,
page 2.
f. Direct precipitation** - 115 1.5
Totals 7,660 100.0
2. Output - A-l Black River 20,965
3. Net annual P export*** - 13,305
*Estimate based on 13 lakeside residences and 6 camps.
**Estimated (see NES Working Paper No. 175).
***Export probably due to unknown sources and/or sampling error.
-------
14
C. Annual Total Nitrogen Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
% of
Source kg N/yr total
a. Tributaries (nonpoint load) -
A-2 Black River 489,665 62.3
B-l Logan Creek 147,960 18.8
C-l Sinking Creek 44,070 5.6
b. Minor tributaries and immediate
drainage (nonpoint load) - 93,195 11.8
c. Known municipal STP's -
Ellington 2,420 0.3
Annapolis 1,140 0.2
d. Septic tanks* - 560 0.1
e. Known industrial - see discussion,
page 2.
f. Direct precipitation** - 7,125 0.9
Totals 786,135 100.0
2. Output - A-l Black River 973,230
3. Net annual N export*** - 187,095
*Estimate based on 13 lakeside residences and 6 camps.
**Estimated (see NES Working Paper No. 175).
***Export probably due to unknown sources and/or sampling error.
-------
15
D. Mean Annual Nonpoint Nutrient Export by Subdrainage Area:
Tributary kg P/knr/yr kg N/knr/yr
Black River 4 383
Logan Creek 1 332
Sinking Creek 2 230
E. Mean Nutrient Concentrations in Ungaged Streams:
Mean Total P Mean Total N
Tributary (mg/1) (mg/1)
D-l Bear Branch 0.018 1.362
Nutrient levels for the above tributary are higher than those
found for the gaged tributaries to Clearwater Lake.
-------
16
F. Yearly Loadings:
In the following table, the existing phosphorus annual
loading is compared to the relationship proposed by Vollenweider
(1975). Essentially, his eutrophic loading is that at which
the receiving waters would become eutrophic or remain eutrophic;
his oligotrophic loading is that which would result in the
receiving water remaining oligotrophic or becoming oligotrophic
if morphometry permitted. A mesotrophic loading would be
considered one between eutrophic and oligotrophic.
Note that Vollenweider's model may not apply to lakes with
short hydraulic retention times or in which light penetration is
severely restricted by high concentrations of suspended solids
in the surface waters.
Total Yearly
Phosphorus Loading
(g/m2/yr)
Estimated loading for Clearwater Lake 1.16
Vollenweider's eutrophic loading 2.02
Vollenweider's oligotrophic loading 1.01
-------
17
V. LITERATURE REVIEWED
Missouri Department of Natural Resources (manuscript). Water
Quality Management Basin Plan for the White River Basin.
Division of Environmental Quality, Jefferson City, Missouri.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1971. Inventory of
Municipal Waste Facilities. EPA Publication IOWP-1, Vol. 7.
Office of Media Programs, Office of Water Programs, U.S. Gov't.
Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1975. National Eutrophi-
cation Survey Methods 1973-1976. Working Paper No. 175.
National Environmental Research Center, Las Vegas, Nevada,
and Pacific Northwest Environmental Research Laboratory,
Corvallis, Oregon.
Vollenweider, R. A. 1975. Input-Output Models With Special
Reference to the Phosphorus Loading Concept in Limnology.
Schweiz. Z. Hydrol. 37:53-84.
-------
18
VI. APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
CONVERSION FACTORS
-------
CONVERSION FACTORS
Hectares x 2.471 = acres
Kilometers x 0.6214 = miles
Meters x 3.281 = feet
Cubic meters x 8.107 x 10"4 = acre/feet
Square kilometers x 0.3861 = square miles
Cubic meters/sec x 35.315 = cubic feet/sec
Centimeters x 0.3937 = inches
Kilograms x 2.205 - pounds
Kilograms/square kilometer x 5.711 = Ibs/square mile
-------
APPENDIX B
TRIBUTARY FLOW DATA
-------
TRIBUTARY FLCw INFORMATION FOR MISSOURI
03/24/77
LAKE CODE 2901 CLEAkWATEW LAKE
TOTAL DRAINAGE ASEA OF LAKE (SO KM)
SUB-DRAINAGE
AREAfSQ KM)
JAN
FE3
2325.8
MAR
APR
MAY
NORMALIZED FLOWS(CMS)
JUN JUL AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
OEC
2901A1
2901A2
2901B1
2901C1
2901ZZ
2325. d
1276.9
445.5
191.7
411.8
23.81
16.25
2.46
0.88
4.30
33.98
19.40
3.77
1.44
5.41
39.36
26.42
5.44
2.21
7.48
38.23
29.73
5.86
2.27
8.33
36.81
26.25
6.63
2.66
7.82
25.54
16.31
4.05
1.47
4.79
15.12
8.24
2.92
1.25
2.72
14.19
4.76
1.10
0.40
1.39
12.32
5.58
1.67
0.68
1.73
11.67
7.11
1.73
0.71
2.10
14.89
11.33
1.59
0.54
2.S*4
22. 88
12.15
1.53
0.54
3.11
24.00
15.25
3.23
1.25
4.33
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS(CMS)
TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAR MEAN FLOW DAY
2901A1
2901A2
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
74
74
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
74
74
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
24.381
15.093
23.163
22.172
42.758
42.475
74.190
66.545
54.085
18.293
12.573
11.865
11.355
6.881
21.521
7.900
36.529
51.253
47.572
30.582
19.142
6.513
5.069
6.116
14
5
2
7
18
1
1
5
3
28
27
16
14
5
2
8
18
1
1
5
3
28
27
16
19.680
18.349
13.451
28.883
71.642
24.947
90.897
84.667
90.048
12.176
13.281
8.835
16.084
6.654
6.088
8.014
17.387
121.196
31.998
21.039
24.947
5.663
5.720
5.578
SUMMARY
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA OF LAKE = 2325.8
SUM OF SUB-DRAINAGE AREAS = 2325.8
TOTAL FLOW IN =
TOTAL FLOW OUT =
FLOW DAY
FLOW DAY
FLOW
17
17
14.357
2R9.45
288.80
-------
TRIBUTARY FLOW INFORMATION FOR
02/24/77
LA
TRIBJTARY MONTH YEAR MEAN FLOW DAY
29G1C1
2901ZZ
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
H
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
74
74
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
74
74
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
74
74
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
7b
75
75
3.398
1.699
3.002
0.991
5.522
9.939
9.798
5.975
4.757
1.586
1.784
1.416
1.388
0.708
1.019
0.340
1.982
3.823
3.964
2.265
1.982
0.566
0.793
0.510
3.540
2.039
5.607
2.039
9.656
14.272
13.451
8.523
5.692
1.897
1.671
1.756
14
5
2
7
18
1
1
5
3
28
27
16
14
5
2
8
18
1
1
5
3
28
27
16
17
FLOW DAY
l.f.99
0.850
0.425
0.566
1.982
V.911
4.248
2.549
2.832
O.R50
1.133
O.HSO
1.416
0.425
0.340
0.425
1.557
9.061
3.681
2.265
3.115
0.425
0.566
0.396
FLOW (JAY
FLOW
1.982
17
1.472
-------
APPENDIX C
PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL DATA
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 77/03/24
290101
37 08 06.0 090 46 30.0 3
CLEARWATES LAKE
29179 MISSOURI
100591
/TrPA/AMBNT/LAKE".
11EPALES 0*001002
0037 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
12.
12.
11.
11.
22.
22.
21.
20.
19.
17.
17.
17.
17.
2
0
9
9
8
8
3
3
8
3
1
1
1
00300
DO
MG/L
9.
9.
10.
9.
9.
7.
*>.
4.
fi.
8.
8.
8.
a
8
0
6
0
C
4
6
8
6
6
4
00077
TR6NSP
SECCH1
INCHES
35
102
40
00094
CNDUCTVY
FIELD
MICROMHO
145
145
144
143
198
197
190
191
185
211
211
211
211
00400
PH
SU
7.90
7.9C
7.90
7.90
8.50
8.4C
7.80
7.60
7.60
7.89
7.89
7.89
7.87
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
80
ao
79
78
89
87
86
98
96
125
124
122
124
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.040
0.040
0.050
0.020
O.OHO
0.030
0.020
0.030
0.030
0.060
0.060
0.060
0.050
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.400
0.200K
0.200K
0.200K
0.200
0.200K
0.200K
0.200K
0.200K
0.200
0.200K
0.200K
0.200K
00630
N02&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.170
0.160
0.170
0.140
0.050
0.030
0.070
0.130
0.130
0.090
0.090
0.090
0.090
00671
PHOS-OIS
ORTrtO
MG/L P
0.004
0.004
0.005
0.005
0.004
0.005
0.003
0.002
0.004
0.004
0.003
0.004
0.003
DATE
FROM
TO
74/04/09
74/06/18
74/10/08
TIME
OF
DAY
11 00
11 00
11 00
11 00
12 05
12 05
12 05
12 05
12 05
12 05
11 40
11 40
11 40
11 40
DEPTH
FEET
0000
0005
0015
0032
0000
0003
0005
0020
0030
0039
0000
0005
0015
0035
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.017
0.015
0.017
0.018
0.011
0.015
0.013
0.015
0.017
0.016
0.017
0.017
0.021
32217 00031
CHLRPHYL INCDT LT
A REMNING
UG/L PERCENT
4.5
3.3
50.0
1.0
6.6
K VfiUJt KNIMN T0 BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STO«Er RETRIEVAL OATC 77/Oc/?4
290102
37 10 29.0 090 47
CLEARWATEP LAKE
39179 MISSOURI
18.0 3
100591
/TYPA/AM6NT/LAKE
11E3ALES 0400
0012 FEET DEPTH CLASS
DATE
FROM
TO
74/04/09
74/06/18
74/10/OB
DATE
FROM
TO
74/04/09
74/06/18
74/10/09
TIME DEPTH
OF
iJAY FEET
1 10 0000
1 30 0002
1 30 0008
1 10 0000
1 10 0005
1 10 0014
1 00 0000
11 00 0005
11 00 0010
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
11 30 0000
11 30 0008
11 10 0000
11 10 0005
11 10 0014
11 10 0017
11 00 0000
11 00 0005
11 00 0010
C0010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
9.3
9.3
9.2
24.1
23.9
22.0
16.3
15.6
15.6
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.010
0.010
0.016
0.015
0.018
0.023
0.012
0.015
00300
DO
MG/L
1C. 6
11.0
9.2
9.0
8.2
9.0
9.0
8.4
32217
CHLRPHYL
A
UG/L
0.3
1.0
2.2
00077
TRANSP
SECCHI
INCHES
60
108
30
00031
INCDT LT
REMNING
PERCENT
1.0
00094
CNDUCTVY
FIELD
MICROMHO
143
143
142
203
201
202
215
217
215
00400
PH
su
7.95
7.95
8.50
8.40
8.00
7.69
7.69
7.67
00410 00610
T ALK NH3-N
CAC03 TOTAL
MG/L MG/L
86. 0.030
86 0.050
97 0.030
98 0.020
99 0.020
129 0.120
129 0.040
133 0.090
1002
00
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.200
0.200K
0.300
0.200*
0.200K
0.700
0.200K
0.200K
00630
N02&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.140
0.150
0.040
0.030
0.080
0.130
0.140
0.140
00671
PHOS-OIS
OriTHO
MG/L P
0.004
0.005
0.003
0.003
0.004
O.U08
0.004
0.003
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL 3
-------
APPENDIX D
TRIBUTARY AND WASTEWATER
TREATMENT PLANT DATA
-------
STOfiET RETRIEVAL DATE 77/0.7/24
/TYPA/AMdNT/STREAM
FEET
2901A1
37 07 55.0 090 46 20.0 4
BLACK RIVE""
29 7.5 CLRWATER 0AM
0/CLEARWATER RESERVOIR 100591
DAM SPILLWAY 50 FT SW OF RIVER ROAD
11EPALES 04001004
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
DATE
FROM
TO
74/09/14
74/10/05
74/11/02
74/12/07
75/01/18
75/02/01
75/03/01
75/04/05
75/05/03
75/05/17
75/06/28
75/07/27
75/08/16
TIME
OF
DAY
13 25
12 45
14 40
12 50
14 00
13 ?5
13 30
13 30
16 00
13 25
13 30
11 50
13 00
00630
N02fcN03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.112
0.400
0.072
0.200
0.208
0.352
C.200
0.160
0.100
0.070
0.015
0.015
0.020
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
1.000
1.000
0.700
1.400
2.100
0.900
2.000
1.250
0.400
0.950
0.825
0.250
1.800
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.055
0.032
0.030
0.080
0.048
0.024
0.104
0.025
0.030
0.035
0.025
0.035
0.110
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.005K
0.007
0.005
0.005K
0.010
0.008K
0.008K
0.010
0.005
0.005K
0.005
0.005K
0.010
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.020
0.025
0.020
0.010K
0.060
0.010
0.070
0.050
0.010K
0.010K
0.030
0.020
0.030
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 77/02/2*.
/TYPA/AMBNT/STREAM
DATE TIME OEPTH N02S.N03
FROM OF
TO DAY FEET
74/09/14
74/10/05
74/11/02
74/12/08
75/01/18
75/02/01
75/03/01
75/04/05
75/05/03
75/05/17
75/06/23
75/07/27
75/08/16
10
09
10
11
11
10
17
12
13
10
12
11
16
30
45
45
10
45
00
00
55
00
30
45
00
00
2901A2
37 19 30.0 090 45 50.0 4
SLACK RIVER
29 7.b LESTERVIL 5E
T/CLEARWATER RESERVOIR 100592
BSDG ON H«Y K 4.4 MI SW OF ANNAPOLIS
11EPALES 04001004
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
i0630
'S.N03
OTAL
IG/L
0.176
0.288
0.112
0.256
0.400
0.184
0.264
0.185
0.075
0.050
0.100
0.075
0.060
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.800
0.500
0.300
0.700
2.000
0.900
3.600
0.850
0.150
0.950
0.350
0.300
0.200
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.020
0.050
0.010
0.015
0.048
0.088
0.048
0.010
0.030.
0.050
0.020
0.020
0.035
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.005K
O.OOSK
O.OOSK
0.005K
O.OOSK
0.008K
O.OOSK
0.005K
O.OOSK
O.OOSK
0.005
O.OOSK
0.005
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
O.OOSK
O.OOSK
0.010K
0.010K
0.010K
0.020
0.010
0.010K
0.010K
0.010K
0.010K
0.010K
0.010
K VALUE KNOWN TO 6E
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 77/02/2"
/TYPA/AMBNT/STREAM
DATE TIME DEPTH N02&N03
FROM OF
TO DAY FEET
74/09/14
74/10/05
74/11/02
74/12/07
75/01/18
75/02/01
75/03/01
75/04/05
75/05/03
75/05/17
75/06/28
75/07/27
75/08/16
12
11
12
11
13
11
12
12
12
12
12
11
11
15
20
55
15
00
30
15
15
15
15
15
30
30
290161
37 14 00.0 090 53 25.0 4
LOGAN CREt*
29 7.5 ELLINGTON
T/CLEAR*ATER RESERVOIR 100591
FORD ON RD 6.3 MI SE OF ELLINGTON
11EPALES 04001004
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
0630
'&.N03
OTAL
IG/L
C.420
0.336
0.192
C.552
0.800
0.660
0.840
0.730
0.345
0.300
0.210
0.130
0.120
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.600
0.500
0.400
1.400
3.700
1.400
1.650
1.150
0.350
0.850
0.050
0.200
0.850
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.025
0.015
0.025
0.008
0.040
. 0.144
0.016
0.015
0.060
0.045
0.025
0.010
0.010
00671
PHOS-OIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.010
0.005
0.005
0.010
0.010
0.016
0.008K
0.005
0.005
0.005K
0.010
0.005K
0.015
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.015
0.005
0.010K
0.020
0.010
0.016
0.020
0.020
0.010
0.010K
0.010
0.010K
0.015
K VALUE KMOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE
/TYPA/AMBNT/STREAM
FEET
2901C1
37 16 10.0 090 51 00.0 4
SINKING CftFEK
29 7.S LESTEKVIL SE
T/CLEARwATER RESERVOIR 100592
FORD ON SO 5 MI SE OF REDFORD
11EPALES 04001004
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
DATE
FROM
TO
74/09/14
74/10/05
74/11/02
74/12/08
75/01/18
75/02/01
75/03/01
75/04/05
75/05/03
75/05/17
75/06/28
75/07/27
75/08/16
TIME i
OF
DAY 1
11 ?0
10 35
12 20
12 00
12 30
11 50
12 30
13 40
14 10
11 30
13 55
12 30
12 00
00630
N02&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.480
0.490
0.312
0.70*
0.768
0.464
0.600
0.370
0.190
0.125
0.075
0,025
0.025
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.800
0.200
0.700
0.600
1.700
0.700
l.flOO
0.600
0.500
1.030
0.400
0.100
0.250
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.025
0.010
0.047
0.010
0.012
0.032
0.032
0.055
0.020
0.030
0.010
0.005
0.025
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.005K
0.005K
0.006
0.005K
0.005K
0.008K
0.003
0.005K
0.005K
0.005K
0.005K
0.005K
0.010
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.005K
0.005K
O.OlOK
O.OlOK
O.OlOK
O.OlOK
0.010
0.010
O.OlOK
O.OlOK
O.OlOK
O.OlOK
0.010
K VALUE KNOWN TO Be
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
3TORET RETRIEVAL DATE 77/OP/24
/TYPA/A'-l BUT/STREAM
DATE TIME DEPTH N02&N03
FROM OF
TO DAY FEET
74/09/14
74/10/05
74/11/02
74/12/08
75/01/18
75/02/01
75/03/01
75/04/05
75/05/03
75/05/17
75/06/28
75/07/27
75/08/16
10 05
09 30
10 10
11 30
10 50
11 30
12 30
12 00
10 00
11 45
10 00
10 35
2901D1
37 19 45.0 090 45 20.0 4
BEAR BRANCH
29 7.5 LESTERVIL SE
T/CLEARWATER RESERVOIR 100592
BANK SAM FRM H«Y K.3.8 M Sw OF ANNAPOLIS
11EPALES 04001004
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
0630
'&N03
OTAL
IG/L
0.084
O.Q40
0.088
0.052
0.144
0.072
0.128
0.045
0.015
0.020
0.025
0.020
0.020
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.700
2.100
0.400
0.700
1.200
1.500
2.500
1.850
0.350
0.850
0.100
0.050
1.200
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.015
0.060
0.035
0.010
0.024
0.024
0.024
0.030
0.015
0.025
0.010
0.010
0.020
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.005K
0.005K
0.007
C.005K
0.005K
0.008K
0.008K
0.005K
0.005K
0.005K
0.010
0.005K
0.010
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.005K
0.005K
0.010K
0.010K
0.010K
0.010K
0.010
0.040
0.010K
0.010K
0.010
0.010K
0.010
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LECS THAN INOICATLO
-------
STOfcET RETRIEVAL DATE 77/02/2*
/AMBNT/ST3EAM
1)0630
DATE TIME DEPTH N02&N03
FROM OF N-TOTAL
TO DAY FEET MG/L
74/11/08
74/12/09
75/01/09
75/02/10
75/03/11
75/04/09
75/05/13
75/06/10
75/07/10
75/12/10
08 00
08 00
08 00
08 00
08 00
08 00
08 00
08 00
08 00
12 30
0.9bO
0.400
0.320
0.960
0.400
0.800
0.050
0.050
0.050
0.625
8.000
8.800
7.100
6.100
5.700
3.300
6.450
2.700
3.850
9.250
2901SA PU2901BA P001100
37 14 50.0 090 57 45.0 4
ELLINGTON
29 7.5 ELLINGTON
T/CLEARwATER RES. 100591
LOGAN CREtK.
11EPALES 00001004
0000 FEET OE^TH CLASS 00
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
50051
FLOW
RATE
INST MGD
50053
CONDUIT
FLOrt-MGD
MONTHLY
0.143
0.170
0.050K
0.090
0.080
0.210
C.078
0.071
0.160
0.092
0.055
1.600
1.650
0.840
0.900
0.230
1.250
1.750
2.800
3.100
100
400
700
900
650
400
850
300
100
4.700
0.432
0.108
0.108
0.432
0.108
0.072
0.400
0.144
0.043
0.360
0.250
0.118
0.100
0.252
0.432
0.432
0.360
0.288
0.094
0.032
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
APPENDIX E
PARAMETRIC RANKINGS OF LAKES
SAMPLED BY NES IN 1974
STATE OF MISSOURI
-------
\_!.K.'f. flATA TO nt USED I'M
COUt LA*E Nftft
2901 CLEA^AtES L4r.'F
2902 PO«M£ DE TEr<~E
2903 STOCKTQNi
390* L^Kf TA."JEYCO*0
290S THOMAS HILL
2906
f.Ef>I AN<
TOTAL H
0,017
"i.043
0.022
0.023
O.OB2
0.033
MEDIAN
IiM.1^1- N
0.150
0.275
0.670
0.530
1.040
0.105
500-
* E A N SET
445.000
4-»9. 92i
4?a,600
4P0.250
487.889
459.667
3.567
8.973
5.787
15-
MIlM DO
10.400
14.IHOO
15.000
11.200
11.800
11.000
OISS
0.004
0 . 0 0 R
0.006
0.007
0.011
0.004
-------
oEfVCENT OF LAKES *ITH i-IIHHEH VALUES ;'JU*3F* OF LA i )
i <»)
( 3)
( U)
( 2)
MEDI AN
I<\iOM5 N
8 0 ( •» )
fed ( 3)
20 ( 1 )
40 ( 2)
01 0)
100 ( 5)
500
60
40
80
100
0
20
VALUES!
SEC
( 3)
( 2)
( 4)
( ^)
( 0)
( 1)
MEAN
CHLOHA
100 ( S)
40 ( ?)
60 ( 3)
0 ( 0)
«0 ( 4)
20 ( 1)
MINI
100
20
0
50
50
80
ou
( 5)
( 1 )
( 0)
( 2)
( 2)
( 4)
MEDIAN
DISS OPT-iO
90
20
f.0
40
0
90
( 4)
( 1)
( 3)
( 2)
( 0)
( 4)
------- |