U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
WORKING PAPER SERIES
REPORT
ON
FWE DE TERRE RESERVOIR
POLK AND HICKORY COUNTIES
MISSOURI
EPA REGION VII
WORKING PAPER No,
CORVALLIS ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY - CORVALLIS, OREGON
and
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING & SUPPORT LABORATORY - LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
699-440
-------
REPORT
ON
POWE DE TERRE RESERVOIR
POU< AND HICKORY COUNTIES
MISSOURI
EPA REGION VII
WORKING PAPER No, 548
VJlTH THE COOPERATION OF THE
MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
AND THE
MISSOURI NATIONAL GUARD
FEBRUARY, 1977
-------
REPORT ON POMME DE TERRE RESERVOIR
POLK AND HICKORY COUNTIES, MISSOURI
EPA REGION VII
by
National Eutrophication Survey
Water and Land Monitoring Branch
Monitoring Applications Laboratory
Environmental Monitoring & Support Laboratory
Las Vegas, Nevada
and
Eutrophication Survey Branch
Con/all is Environmental Research Laboratory
Corvallis, Oregon
Working Paper No. 548
OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
February 1977
-------
CONTENTS
Page
Foreword ii
List of Missouri Study Lakes iv
Lake and Drainage Area Map v
Sections
I. Conclusions 1
II. Lake and Drainage Basin Characteristics 4
III. Lake Water Quality Summary 6
IV. Nutrient Loadings 12
V. Literature Reviewed 18
VI. Appendices 19
-------
ii
FOREWORD
The National Eutrophication Survey was Initiated in 1972 in
response to an Administration commitment to investigate the nation-
wide threat of accelerated eutrophicatlon to freshwater lakes and
reservoirs.
OBJECTIVES
The Survey was designed to develop, in conjunction with state
environmental agencies, information on nutrient sources, concen-
trations, and impact on selected freshwater lakes as a basis for
formulating comprehensive and coordinated national, regional, and
state management practices relating to point source discharge
reduction and nonpoint source pollution abatement in lake water-
sheds.
ANALYTIC APPROACH
The mathematical and statistical procedures selected for the
Survey's eutrophication analysis are based on related concepts
that:
a. A generalized representation or model relating
sources, concentrations, and Impacts can be
constructed.
b. By applying measurements of relevant parameters
associated with lake degradation, the generalized
model can be transformed into an operational
representation of a lake, its drainage basin, and
related nutrients.
c. With such a transformation, an assessment of the
potential for eutrophication control can be made. ,
LAKE ANALYSIS
In this report, the first stage of evaluation of lake and
watershed data collected from the study lake and its drainage
basin is documented. The report is formatted to provide state
environmental agencies with specific Information for basin
flanninq [§303(e)], water quality criteria/standards review
§303(c)], clean lakes [§314(a,b)]t and water quality monitoring
[§106 and §305(b)] activities mandated by the Federal Water
Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972.
-------
111
Beyond the single lake analysis, broader based correlations
between nutrient concentrations (and loading) and trophic condition
are being made to advance the rationale and data base for refine-
ment of nutrient water quality criteria for the Nation's freshwater
lakes. Likewise, multivariate evaluations for the relationships
between land use, nutrient export, and trophic condition, by lake
class or use, are being developed to assist 1n the formulation
of planning guidelines and policies by the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency and to augment plans Implementation by the states.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The staff of the National Eutrophication Survey (Office of
Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency)
expresses sincere appreciation to the Missouri Department of Natural
Resources for professional involvement, to the Missouri National
Guard for conducting the tributary sampling phase of the Survey,
and to those Missouri wastewater treatment plant operators who
provided effluent samples and flow data.
The staff of the Missouri Department of Natural Resources,
James Wilson, Director; the Division of Environmental Quality,
Ken Karch, Director; and the Water Quality Program, James Odendahl,
Director, provided invaluable lake documentation and counsel during
the Survey, reviewed the preliminary reports and provided critiques
most useful in the preparation of this Working Paper series.
Major General Charles M. Kiefner, the Adjutant General of Missouri,
and Project Officer Captain Donald L. Well en, who directed the
volunteer efforts of the Missouri National Guardsmen, are also
gratefully acknowledged for their assistance to the Survey.
-------
IV
LAKE NAME
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
STUDY LAKES
STATE OF MISSOURI
Clearwater Lake
Pomrne de Terre Reservoir
Stockton Reservoir
Lake Taneycomo
Thomas Hill Reservoir
Lake Wappapello
COUNTY
Reynolds
Polk, Hickory
Dade, Polk, Cedar
Taney
Macon, Randolph
Wayne, Butler
-------
PanmeDe Terre
River
POMME Of TERRE
RESERVOIR
POMME DE :ESERVOIR
Tributary Sampling Site
x Lake Sampling Site
J Sewage Treatment Facility
Drainage Area Boundary
Ldnd Subject to Inundation
-------
REPORT ON POMME DE TERRE RESERVOIR, MISSOURI
STORE! NO. 2902
I. CONCLUSIONS
A. Trophic Condition:*
Based upon field observations and Survey data, Pomme de
Terre Reservoir is considered eutrophic, i.e., nutrient rich
and highly productive. Whether such nutrient enrichment is
to be considered beneficial or deleterious is determined by
its actual or potential impact upon designated beneficial
water uses of each lake.
Chlorophyll a^ values ranged from a low of 2.2 yg/1 to
a high of 20.9 yg/1 in the summer with a mean of 11.0 yg/1.
Low Secchi disc visibility (mean 127 cm) and high potential
for primary productivity, as measured by algal assay control
yield, were reported. Of the six Missouri lakes sampled in
1974, one had greater median total phosphorus levels, three
had greater median inorganic nitrogen values, and one had
greater median dissolved orthophosphorus levels than Pomme de
Terre Reservoir.
The Missouri Department of Natural Resources (manuscript)
reports that the dissolved oxygen in Pomme de Terre Reservoir
often depletes in the hypolimnion during summer stratification,
resulting in production of hydrogen sulfide in the lower reaches
*See Appendix E.
-------
of the lake. Survey limnologists reported no problem algal blooms
or macrophyte growths during their visits to the lake.
B. Rate-Limiting Nutrient:
Algal assay results indicate that Pomme de Terre Reservoir
was limited by available phosphorus levels. Spikes with phos-
phorus or nitrogen and phosphorus simultaneously resulted in in-
creased assay yields. Addition of nitrogen alone did not stimu-
late a growth response. The ratios of available nitrogen to
orthophosphorus (N/P) in sampled waters further substantiate phos-
phorus limitation.
C. Nutrient Controllability:
1. Point sources -
Point sources contributed 34.3% of the total phosphorus
load to Pomme de Terre Reservoir. The city of Bolivar waste-
water treatment plant contributed 23.6% of the total load,
and the city of Buffalo contributed 6.7%.
2
The calculated phosphorus loading of 0.66 g P/m /yr to
Pomme de Terre Reservoir is about twice the loading proposed
by Vollenweider (1975) for an oligotrophic lake and slightly
above the eutrophic load. Reduction of phosphorus loading from
a
known point sources would drop loading to below Vollenweider's
eutrophic loading and be expected to improve the water quality
of Pomme de Terre Reservoir.
-------
2. Nonpoint sources -
The total phosphorus load from nonpoint sources accounted
for 65.7% of the load reaching Pomme de Terre Reservoir. The
Pomme de Terre River contributed 46.5% while minor tribu-
taries and immediate drainage contributed 4.5% of the total.
-------
II. LAKE AND DRAINAGE BASIN CHARACTERISTICS
Lake and drainage basin characteristics are itemized below.
Lake morphometric data were provided by the Missouri Clean Water
Commission. Tributary flow data were provided by the Missouri
District Office of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). Outlet
drainage area includes the lake surface area. Mean hydraulic
retention time was obtained by dividing the lake volume by the
mean flow of the outlet. Precipitation values are estimated by
methods as outlined in National Eutrophication Survey (NES)
Working Paper No. 175. A table of metric/English conversions is
included as Appendix A.
A. Lake Morphometry:
2
1. Surface area: 31.65 km .
2. Mean depth: 9.5 meters.
3. Maximum depth: 24.1 meters.
4. Volume: 300.675 x 10° m3.
5. Mean hydraulic retention time: 314 days.
-------
B. Tributary and Outlet:
(See Appendix B for flow data)
1. Tributaries -
Drainage Mean flow
Name area(km ) (m /sec)
A-2 Pomme de Terre River 714.8 4.97
B-l Lindley River 297.8 2.60
E-l Dry Fork Creek 77.7 0.45
Minor tributaries and
immediate drainage - 470.3 3.79
Totals 1,561.1 11.81
2. Outlet - A-1 Pomme de 1,592.8 11.07
Terre River
C. Precipitation:
1. Year of sampling: 110.8 cm.
2. Mean annual: 99.8 cm.
-------
III. LAKE WATER QUALITY SUMMARY
Pomme de Terre Reservoir was sampled three times during the
open-water season of 1974 by means of a pontoon-equipped Huey
helicopter. Each time, samples for physical and chemical para-
meters were collected from five stations on the lake (Station 05
was sampled only twice) and from a number of depths at each station
(see map, page v). During each visit, depth-integrated samples
were collected from each station for chlorophyll a_ analysis and
phytoplankton identification and enumeration. During the first
• and last visits, 18.9-liter depth-integrated samples were compo-
sited for algal assays. Maximum depths sampled were 22.9 meters
at Station 01, 19.5 meters at Station 02, 9.1 meters at Station 03,
12.2 meters at Station 04, and 3.0 meters at Station 05. For a
more detailed explanation of NES methods, see NES Horking Paper
No. 175.
The results obtained are presented in full in Appendix C and
are summarized in III-A for waters at the surface and at the maxi-
mum depth for each site. Results of the phytoplankton counts and
chlorophyll a^ determinations are included in III-B. Results of the
limiting nutrient study are presented in III-C.
-------
OE TE«f
-------
B. Biological Characteristics:
1. Phytoplankton -
Sampling
Date
04/08/74
06/20/74
10/08/74
Dominant
Genera
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1.
2.
3.
4,
5.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Melosira
Stephanodiscus
Cryptomonas
Euglena
Chlamydomonas
Other genera
Total
Aphanizomenon
Cyclotella
Carteria
Cryptomonas
Chroomonas
Other genera
Total
Melosira
Dactylococcopsis
Chroomonas
Crucigenia
Scenedesmus
Other genera
Algal
Units
per ml
1,524
1,001
334
333
238
285
3,715
887
887
493
444
394
1,677
4,782
1,233
596
340
256
170
596
Total
3,191
-------
2. Chlorophyll a_ -
Sampling Station Chlorophyll
Date Number (yg/1)
04/08/74 01 6.8
02 6.8
03 14.2
04 6.6
05 ----
06/20/74 01 13.2
02 11.9
03 2.2
04 4.5
05 20.9
10/08/74 01 6.8
02 5.0
03 8.3
04 6.4
05 18.6
-------
10
Limiting Nutrient Study:
1. Autoclaved, filtered, and nutrient spiked -
a. 04/08/74 - Stations 01-04
Ortho P
Spike(mg/l) Conc.(mg/l)
Control
0.05 P
0.05 P + 1.0 N
1.00 N
b. 10/08/74 -
Control
0.05 P
0.05 P +.1.0 N
1.00 N
c. 10/08/74 -
Control
0.05 P
0.05 P + 1.0 N
1.00 N
Discussion -
The control
0.020
0.070
0.070
0.020
Stations 01
0.020
0.070
0.070
0.020
Stations 02
0.033
0.083
0.083
0.033
yields of
Inorganic N
Conc.(mg/l )
0.645
0.645
1.645
1.645
, 04, 05
0.156
0.156
1.156
1.156
, 03
0.131
0.131
1.131
1.131
the assay alga,
Maximum Yield
(mg/l-dry wt. )
8.1
18.8
21.7
8.7
2.1
6.1
16.7
1.7
1.8
4.1
16.2
1.6
Selenastrum capr
cornutum, indicate that the potentials for primary production
at the times of sampling were high on Pomme de Terre Reservoir.
Increased growth of the test alga in response to an addition
of orthophosphorus indicates that the lake was limited by phos-
phorus during the spring and fall sampling. Spikes with nitro-
gen and orthophosphorus simultaneously resulted in maximum
yield. The addition of nitrogen alone did not stimulate a growth
beyond the control yield.
-------
11
The N/P ratios in sampled waters of 30/1 in the spring,
16/1 in the summer, and 29/1 in the fall further indicate
phosphorus limitation (an N/P ratio of 14/1 or greater generally
reflects phosphorus limitation).
-------
12
IV. NUTRIENT LOADINGS
(See Appendix D for data)
For the determination of nutrient loadings, the Missouri
National Guard collected monthly near-surface grab samples from
each of the tributary sites indicated on the map (pagev), ex-
cept for the high runoff months of May and June when two sam-
ples were collected. Sampling was begun in September 1974, and
was completed in August 1975.
Through an interagency agreement, stream flow estimates for
the year of sampling and a "normalized" or average year were pro-
vided by the Missouri District Office of the USGS for the tribu-
tary sites nearest the lake.
In this report, nutrient loads for sampled tributaries were
determined by using a modification of a USGS computer program for
calculating stream loadings. Nutrient loads indicated for tribu-
taries are those measured minus known point source loads, if any.
Nutrient loadings for unsampled "minor tributaries and imme-
diate drainage" ("II" of USGS) were estimated by using the mean
2
annual nutrient loads, in kg/km /yr, in Dry Creek Fork at Station
o
E-l, and multiplying the means by the II area in km .
The operator of the Bolivar wastewater treatment plant pro-
vided monthly effluent samples and corresponding flow data. Nutri-
ent loads for the Buffalo, Prairie Height Subdivision, and Quail
Creek Mobile Home Park wastewater treatment plants were estimated
at 1.134 kg P and 3.401 kg N/Capita/yr.
-------
13
A. Waste Sources:
1. Known municipal
Name
Bolivar
Buffalo*
Prairie Heights
Subdivision***
Quail Creek Mobile
Home Park***
Population
Served
5,300
1,220
397
333
Treatment
Mean Flow
(m3/d x 1Q3)
Trickling
filtert
Trickling
filter
Stabilization
pond
Stabilization
pond
2.598
0.462**
0.150**
0.126**
Receiving
Water
Piper Creek
Lindley Creek
Mile Branch/
Piper Creek
Hominy Creek/
Pomme de Terre River
2. Known industrial - None
*U.S.EPA, 1971.
**Estimated at 0.3785 m3/capita/day.
***Missouri Department of Natural Resources (manuscript).
tTrickling filter first three months, oxidation ditch after that time.
-------
14
B. Annual Total Phosphorus Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
% of
Source kg P/yr total
a. Tributaries (nonpoint load) -
A-2 Pomme de Terre River 9,670 46.5
B-l Lindley River 2,295 11.0
E-l Dry Fork Creek 175 0.8
b. Minor tributaries and immediate
drainage (nonpoint load) - 940 4.5
c. Known municipal STP's -
Bolivar 4,905 23.6
Buffalo 1,385 6.7
Prairi.e Heights Subdivision 450 2.2
Quail Creek Mobile Home Park 380 1.8
d. Septic tanks* - 25 0.1
e. Known industrial - None
f. Direct precipitation** - 555 2.7
Totals 20,780 100.0
2. Output - A-l Pomme de Terre 12,680
River
3. Net annual P accumulation - 8,100
*Estimate based on 50 lakeside residences, 1 park, and 6 camps.
**Estimated (see NES Working Paper No. 175).
-------
15
C. Annual Total Nitrogen Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
% of
Source kg N/yr total
a. Tributaries (nonpoint load) -
A-2 Pomme de Terre River 289,920 47.8
B-l Lindley River 132,930 21.9
E-l Dry Fork Creek 18,630 3.1
b. Minor tributaries and immediate
drainage (nonpoint load) - 112,990 18.6
c. Known municipal STP's -
Bolivar 10,775 1.8
Buffalo 4,150 0.7
Prairie Heights Subdivision 1,350 0.2
Quail Creek Mobile Home Park 1,130 0.2
d. Septic tanks* - 990 0.2
e. Known industrial - None
f. Direct precipitation** - 34,170 5.6
Totals 607,035 100.0
2. Output - A-2 Pomme de Terre 433,540
River
3. Net annual N accumulation - 173,495
*Estimate based on 50 lakeside residences, 1 park, and 6 camps,
**Estimated (see NES Working Paper No. 175).
-------
16
D Mean Annual Nonpoint Nutrient Export by Subdrainage Area:
Tributary kg P/km^/yr kg N/km^/yr
Pomme de Terre River 14 406
Lindley River 8 446
Dry Fork Creek 2 240
E Mean Nutrient Concentrations in Ungaged Streams:
Mean Total P Mean Total N
Tributary (mg/1) (mg/1)
C-l Ingalls Creek 0.019 1.209
D-l Piper Creek 0.727 1.767
F-l Abels Branch 0.038 1.334
G-l Jordan Creek 0.019 1.137
H-l Brush Creek 0.021 1.297
Nutrient concentrations in tributary D-l, Piper Creek, appear
greatly inflated when compared to the other ungaged tributaries to
Pomme de Terre Reservoir. This inflation is probably a result of
impaction from the Bolivar and Vrairie Heights Subdivision sewage
treatment plants upstream.
-------
17
F. Yearly Loadings:
In the following table, the existing phosphorus annual
loading is compared to the relationship proposed by Vollenweider
(1975). Essentially, his eutrophic loading is that at which
the receiving waters would become eutrophic or remain eutrophic;
his oligotrophic loading is that which would result in the
receiving water remaining oligotrophic or becoming oligotrophic
if morphometry permitted. A mesotrophic loading would be
considered one between eutrophic and oligotrophic.
Note that Vollenweider's model may not apply to lakes with
short hydraulic retention times or in which light penetration is
severely restricted by high concentrations of suspended solids
in the surface waters.
Total Yearly
Phosphorus Loading
(g/m2/yr)
Estimated loading for Pomme de Terre Reservoir 0.66
Vollenweider's eutrophic loading 0.64
Vollenweider's oligotrophic loading 0.32
-------
18
V. LITERATURE REVIEWED
Missouri Department of Natural Resources, manuscript. Water
Quality Management Basin Plan for Osage - Gasconade River
Basin. Water Quality Program, Division of Environmental
Quality, Jefferson City, Missouri.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1971. Inventory of
Municipal Waste Facilities, EPA Publication #OWP-1, Vol. 7,
U.S. Gov't. Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1975-. National Eutro-
phication Survey Methods 1973-1976. Working Paper No. 175.
National Environmental Research Center, Las Vegas, Nevada,
and Pacific Northwest Environmental Research Laboratory,
Corvallis, Oregon.
Vollenweider, R. A. 1975. Input-Output Models With Special
Reference to the Phosphorus Loading Concept in Limnology.
Schweiz. Z. Hydrol. 37:53-84.
-------
19
VI. APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
CONVERSION FACTORS
-------
CONVERSION FACTORS
Hectares x 2.471 = acres
Kilometers x 0.6214 = miles
Meters x 3.201 = feet
Cubic meters x 8.107 x 10 = acre/feet
Square kilometers x 0.38G1 = square.miles
Cubic meters/sec x 35.315 = cubic feet/sec
Centimeters x 0.3937 = inches
Kilograms x 2.205 = pounds
-.
Kilograms/square kilometer x 5.711 = Ibs/square mile
-------
APPENDIX B
TRIBUTARY FLOW DATA
-------
TRIBUTARY FLOW INFORMATION FOR MISSOURI
LAKE CODE 8902 POMME DE TERRE RESERVOIR
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA OF LAKE(SO KM) 159?.8
SUB-DRAINAGE
TRIBUTARY
2902A1
2902A2
2902H1
2902E1
290222
ARE A (SO KM)
1592.8
714.8
297.8
77.7
502.5
JAN
9.51
4.08
2.38
0.28
3.17
FEB
14.22
6.23
2.4]
0.51
4.45
KA3
16.48
8.50
5.35
0.85
6.91
APR
16.00
8.78
4.39
0.79
6.57
MAY
24.92
9.34
4.45
1.02
6.97
NORMALIZED FLC*S(CMS)
JUN
7.48
4.25
1.73
0.51
3.06
JJc
9.88
3.96
l.bO
0.51
2.80
AU.j
2.75
2.41
0.34
0.12
1.36
StP
4.02
3.40
1.30
0.27
2.35
OCT
7.59
3.31
2.55
0.25
2.89
NGv
8.64
3.09
2.15
0.17
2.55
L)tC
11.38
2.44
2.63
0.18
2.46
ML AN
11.07
4.97
2.60
0.45
3.79
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA OF LAKE = 1592.8
SUM OF SUB-ORAINAGE AREAS = 1592.6
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS(CMS)
TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAR MEAN FLOW DAY
2902A1
FLOW DAY
2902A2
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1 1
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
74
74
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
74
74
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
12.828
3.171
69.659
18.123
17.698
58.899
69.376
23.588
1.246
3.738
4.021
1.303
3.115
1.614
19.237
7.646
18.378
27.269
31.715
9.599
6.343
2.577
0.481
1.019
14
19
9
14
26
22
15
19
3
7
19
23
14
19
9
14
26
22
15
19
3 .
7
19
23
29.733
3.115
3.200
29.450
3.540
15.8C1
69.376
1.444
1.218
1.189
1.444
1.303
1.699
1.642
10.421
ll.?13
3.511
110.436
31.149
4.248
8.778
1.416
0.368
0.201
17
21
21
SUMMARY
TOTAL FLOW IN
TOTAL FLOW OUT
FLOW DAY
FLOW
1.303
2.124
1.133
141.95
132.86
-------
FLO/' INFORMATION FGtf MISSOURI
LA
0.368
1.671
3.25ft
1.98?
47.572
6.796
1.444
2.010
0.122
0.0
0.0
0.023
0.057
0.127
0.22A
0.229
9.911
1.133
0.255
0.453
0.037
0.003
0.006
17
21
17
21
0.283
0.142
0.057
0.040
-------
APPENDIX C
PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL DATA
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL OAT£ 77/Q2/?';
/TYPA/AMBNT/LAKE
DATE
FROM
TO
74/04/03
74/06/20
74/10/08
TIME
OF
DAY
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
00
00
00
00
00
1C
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
1C
10
10
10
DEPTH
FEET
0000
0005
0015
0040
0075
0000
0005
0015
0020
0025
0030
0040
0045
0060
0000
0005
0015
0025
0040
0052
0064
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
10.8
10.8
10.4
10.4
10.4
26.3
26.4
25.6
25.3
24.1
21.6
20.4
17.1
13.9
19.0
18.9
18.8
18.3
18.3
18.3
17. 4
290201
37 53 SO.O 093 18 50.0 3
POMME DE TEWRE RESERVOIR
29035 MISSOURI
091491
11EPALES 04001002
0081 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00300
00
MG/L
9.4
9.6
9.6
9.2
10.4
1C. 2
10.4
9.6
3.4
3.0
2.0
0.2
0.6
6.8
6.8
6.4
6.2
6.4
6.2
3.6
00077 00094
TRiNSP CNDUCTVY
SECCHI FIELD
INCHES MICROMHO
35 168
168
166
166
166
108 250
247
244
242
242
225
228
211
193
84 212
208
207
206
206
206
211
00400
PH
su
7.90
7.90
7.80
7.80
7.80
6.90
8.90
8.90
8.80
7.70
7.60
7.60
7.10
7. 30
8.05
8.00
7.95
7.90
7.90
7.90
7.70
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
130
100
100
98
97
120
120
108
108
108
110
110
108
105
119
116
116
114
115
115
121
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.110
0.070
0.100
0.070
0.070
0.150
0.060
0.050
0.040
0.050
0.060
0.050
0.080
0.020K
0.090
0.060
0.070
0.070
0.070
0.060
0.360
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.600
0.500
0.500
0.500
0.400
1.200
0.500
0.500
0.400
0.400
0.400
0.300
0.400
0.400
0.500
0.200K
0.200K
0.200K
0.200K
0.200K
0.600
006JO
N02t»N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.690
0.650
0.680
0.640
0.630
0.140
0.110
0.090
0.090
0.290
0.390
0.560
0.650
0.540
0.170
0.160
0.150
0.160
0.160
0.160
0.110
00671
PHOS-UI5
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.024
0.023
0.024
0.022
0.022
0.026
0.010
0.007
0.007
0.004
0.014
0.007
0.008
0.003
0.007
0.005
0.006
0.005
0.005
0.006
0.014
K V.ALUE KiNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
b10*£T K'-LTRIEVAI OATF. 77/02/24
390201
37 53 50.0 093 Id 50.0 3
POMME UE TEP^E
290P5 MISSOURI
091491
/TY°A/A.M6NT/LAKE
00665
DATE TIME DEPTH PHOS-TOT
FROM OF
TO GAY FEET MG/L P
0.057
0.052
0.051
0.053
0.054
0.030
0.030
G.025
0.027
0.020
0.021
0.022
0.031
0.023
0.02<«
0.025
0.022
0.027
0.026
0.020
0.055
11EPALES
OOol FEET
0-+001C02
OtPTri CLASS 00
74/04/08 15
15
15
15
15
74/Ot>/20 15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
74/10/08 15
15
15
15
15
15
15
00
00
00
00
00
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
0000
0005
OOlb
0040
0075
0000
0001
0005
0009
0015
0020
0025
0030
0040
0045
0060
0000
0005
0015
0025
0040
0052
0064
32217
CHLRPHYL
A
UG/L
6.8
13.2
OC031
INCDT LT
PENNING
PERCENT
50.0
1.0
6.8
-------
SVO.IET HET^FVAL Q&TE 7;/oH/24
290202
37 52 10.0 093 21 29.0 3
FOMME DE TEKRt
/TYPA/AMBNT/LAKE
11EPALES 04001002
OOM FEET OtPTn. CLASS 00
DATE
FROM
TO
74/04/08
74/06/21
74/10/07
OC010
TIME DEPTH WATER
OP TEMP
DAY FEET
15
15
15
15
15
10
10
10
10
10
10
15
15
15
15
15
30
30
30
30
30
50
50
50
50
50
50
30
30
30
30
30
0000
0005
0015
0035
0055
0000
OOOS
0015
0040
0050
0064
0000
0005
0015
0030
0048
CENT
10
10
10
10
10
24
2<»
23
18
15
14
18
18
18
la
18
.6
.6
.6
.5
.5
. 1
.0
.1
.d
.5
.6
.3
.2
.2
.2
.1
00300
DO
MG/L
9
9
9
9
6
a
7
C
C
1
7
7
7
7
7
.4
.6
.8
.2
.2
.*»
.8
.6
.2
.2
.6
.4
.2
.2
.2
00300
DO
MG/L
9.4
9.6
9.8
9.2
6.2
a. 4
7.8
C.6
C.2
1.2
7.6
7.4
7.2
7.2
7.2
00077
TR^NSP
SECCHI
INCHES
25
72
84
00094
CNOUCTVY
FIELD
MICROMHO
167
167
167
167
167
267
266
261
236
230
223
223
221
221
221
221
00400
PH
su
7.8?
7.80
7.80
7.80
7.80
3.70
«. 7C
8.2a
7.90
7.80
a. oo
7.73
7.75
7.73
7.71
7.71
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
98
•95
93
94
98
130
133
129
130
135
136
129
129
131
129
132
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
M(j/L
o.oao
0.110
0.100
0.100
0.100
0.060
0.040
0.040
0.040
0.300
0.270
0.030
0.030
0.020
0.040
0.060
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.600
0.400
0.400
0.400
0.600
0.600
0.600
0.600
0.500
0.800
0.800
0.700
0.500
0.400
0.400
0.500
00630
N02&N03
N-TOTAL
Mii/L
0.690
0.710
0.710
0.700
0.710
0.130
0.160
0.160
0.440
0.350
0.360
0.160
0.160
0.160
0.180
0.170
00071
PMOS-DIS
OUTHO
MG/L P
0.035
0.034
0.035
0.034
0.036
0.005
0.003
0.011
0.007
0.014
0.014
0.006
0.005
0.005
0.006
0.010
-------
DATE '77.'02-'2<*
/TYPA/AM8NT-/LAKE
DATE
FROM
TO
74/04/08
74/06/21
74/10/07
00665 32217 00031
TIME DEPTH PHOS-TOT CHLRPHYL INCOT LT
OF A REMMING
DAY FEET
15
15
15
15
15
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
15
15
15
15
15
15
3C
30
30
30
30
SO
SO
50
so
50
so
50
50
30
30
30
30
30
30
0000
0005
0015
0035
0055
0000
0001
0005
0008
0015
0040
0050
0064
0000
0005
0010
0015
0030
0048
MG/L P
0
0
0
0
c
u
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.073
.072
.072
.074
.073
.037
.035
.029
.041
.088
.070
.034
.025
.023
.026
.030
UG/L PERCENT
6.8
11.9
50.0
1.0
5.0
1.0
37 52 10.0 093 21 29.0 3
POMMt. OE TESRt RESERVOIR
29H4S MISSOURI
091491
11EPALE.5
CC61 FEtT
DEPTH
U4001002
CLASS 00
-------
SICRi'f
OATE ///0?/2<»
290203
37 48 ii.o 093 22 11.c 3
POMME UE TFRRE RESERVOIR
29167 MISSOURI
J91491
/TYPA/AMbNT/LiKF 11EVALES
• 0^001002
0031 FEtT DEPTH CLASS
DATE
FROM
TO
74/04/08
74/06/21
74/10/07
DATE
FROM
TO
74/04/08
74/06/21
74/10/07
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
16 05 0000
16 05 0005
16 05 0015
16 05 0025
11 45 0000
11 45 0005
11 45 0010
11 45 0015
16 00 0000
16 00 0005
16 00 0015
16 00 0030
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
16 05 0000
16 05 0005
16 05 0015
16 05 0025
11 45 0000
11 45 0005
11 45 0003
11 45 0010
11 45 3015
16 00 0000
16 00 0001
16 00 COOS
16 00 0015
16 00 0030
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
11.7
11.5
11.4
11.4
23.3
22.5
22.2
20.4
17.3
17.3
17.2
17.0
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.053
0.053
0.046
0.055
0.040
0.046
0.046
0.056
0.045
0.047
0.054
0.063
00300
DO
MG/L
10.0
10.0
10.0
5.2
4.6
4.0
1.6
7.6
7.4
7.4
7.2
32217
CHLRPHYL
A
UG/L
14.2
2.2
8.3
00077
TRANSP
SECCHI
INCHES
25
60
24
00031
INCDT LT
REMNING
PERCENT
1.0
50.0
1.0
00094
CNOUCTVY
FIELD
MICROMHO
229
229
227
226
270
273
262
256
239
241
239
239
00400
PH
su
8.20
8. 1C
8. 1C
8.10
8.20
8.20
7.90
8.00
7.87
7.89
7.87
7.85
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
137
140
140
140
137
124
123
122
148
145
149
145
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.070
0.050
0.060
0.050
0.140
0.120
0.110
0.140
0.110
0.100
0.120
0.120
00
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.700
0.400
0.500
0.500
0.800
0.600
0.600
0.600
1.000
0.600
0.600
0.600
00630
N02&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.700
0.670
0.680
0.670
0.260
0.240
0.260
0.330
0.070
0.060
0.060
0.050
00671
PnOS-L)IS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.014
0.013
0.013
0.014
0.009
0.008
0.008
0.009
0.008
0.015
0.008
0.010
-------
!EV.ft;. DATE'77
/TYPA/AV.bNT/LM
-------
STOkET SETRIEVAL OATE 7?/02/?4
290205
37 49 55.C 093 16 33.0 3
HOMME OE TERRE RESERVOIR
/TYPA/A*9NT/LAKE:
11EPALES
0400
0014 FEET DEPTH CLASS
DATE
FPOM
TO
74/06/21
74/10/08
DATE
FROM
TO
74/06/21
74/10/OH
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
10 0? 0000
10 02 0005
10 02 0010
16 45 0000
16 45 0005
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
10 02 0000
10 02 OOOb
10 02 0010
16 45 0000
16 45 0001
16 45 0004
16 45 0005
16 45 0008
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
26.2"
25.9
25.7
17.6
17.0
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.081
0.071
0.076
0.056
0.050
00300
DO-
MG/L
7.6
7.4
7.0
9.2
8.8
32217
CHLRPHYL
A
UG/L
20.9
18.6
00077
TRlNSP
SECCHI
INCHES
16
30
00031
INCOT LT
REMNING
PERCENT
1.0
50.0
5.0
1.0
OC094
CNDUCTVY
FIELD
MICROMHO
265
262
262
206
204
00400 00410
PH T ALK
CAC03
SU MG/L
8.50 125
8.5C 122
8. 30 124
8.50 125
8.40 126
9
00610
NHj-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.050
0.020
0.040
0.100
0.070
1002
00
00625 00630
TOT KJEL N026.N03
N N-TOTAL
MG/L MG/L
1.000 0.060
0.800 0.020
0.600 0.020
0.500 0.040
0.300 0.030
00b71
PnOS-OIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.006
0.016
0.009
0.005
0.004
-------
APPENDIX D
TRIBUTARY AND WASTEWATER
TREATMENT PLANT DATA
-------
STORE! 0£T«iEVtL JATE 77/02/24
/TYPA/AMbNT/STREAM
2902A1
37 55 05.0 093 19 45.0 4
POMME DE TERRE PIVE«
2-9 Ib HERMITAGE
0/POMME OE TERRE RcS 091491
BRDG 1.5 MI 8ELOW POMME OE TERRE 0AM
HE^ALES 04001004
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
DATE
FROM
TO
74/09/14
74/10/19
74/11/09
74/12/14
75/02/22
75/03/15
75/04/19
75/05/03
75/05/17
75/06/07
75/06/21
75/07/19
75/08/23
00630 00625
TIME DEPTH N02NN03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TOTAL . N
DAY FEET
11
11
09
11
11
11
11
10
11
12
12
12
12
30
25
35
15
00
50
15
45
35
00
00
00
30
MG/L
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.048
.176
.208
.272
.008
.480
.410
.200
.220
.140
.105
.065
.020
MG/L
2.
1.
0.
0.
1.
1.
1.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
000
200
700
900
000
400
800
450
500
550
500
350
550
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PHOS-DIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
c.
0.
0.
0.
450
035
055
020
008K
032
oeo
015
040
230
050
035
015
MG/L
0.
0.
C.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
P
055
005
005
010
016
024
010
005K
005K
010
005
005K
005
MG/L P
0.115
0.020
0.010
0.030
0.030
0.060
0.050
0.025
0.010
0.050
0.035
0.020
0.050
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
S'sCR.lT
,M_ CKTE ?
/TYPA/A^SNT/STREAM
2902A2
37 tO 57.0 093 22 14.0 4
POMME DE TE*RE RIVER
29 7.3 POLK
T/POMME UE TERRE RES 091491
JEFFERSON BRDG ON riWY 0 7.1 M NE BOLIVAR
11EPALES 04001004
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
DATE
FROM
TO
74/09/14
74/10/19
74/11/09
74/12/14
75/01/26
75/02/22
75/03/15
75/04/19
75/05/03
75/05/17
75/06/07
75/06/21
75/07/19
75/08/23
00630 00625
TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TOTAL N
DAY FEET
14
13
10
11
11
13
11
12
11
11
13
11
12
11
13
13
15
25
10
00
30
?0
40
15
15
20
30
30
30
45
MG/L
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
136
096
120
736
256
570
490
900
230
720
195
240
470
010
030
MG/L
0.
0.
1.
1.
1.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
2.
0.
0.
1.
900
900
100
700
070
^30
900
900
550
500
200
700
650
300
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PHOS-OIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
010
085
345
015
048
024
080
056
070
075
080
080
178
025
015
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
C.
0.
0.
C.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
P
010
025
025
010
005
005
072
016
005K
350
005
035
050
015
015
MG/L P
0.035
0.050
0.030
0.030
0.010
0.010K
0.040
0.020
0.350
0.020
0.070
0.110
0.040
0.110
K VALUE KNOWN TO 8E
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
tfETKiEVAL DATE
DATE
FROM
TO
74/09/15
74/10/19
74/11/09
74/12/14
75/01/26
75/02/2?
75/03/15
75/04/19
75/05/03
75/05/17
75/06/07
75/06/21
75/07/19
75/08/23
TIME 1
OF
DAY 1
10 30
13 30
10 30
11 25
11 00
11 04
12 45
11 30
10 15
10 00
11 00
13 30
14 00
14 15
FEET
37 US 25.0 093 17 10.0 4
LlN'OLEY KlvF.R
23 Ib HE*MITA(jE
T/POMME OE TE«RE «£S 091491
B^DG ON MWY 64 3.4 MI SE OF SENTINEL
11EPALES 04001004
0000 FEET UcPTH CLASS 00
0630
f«N03
OTAL
G/L
0.100
C.032
0.810
0.720
0.504
0.384
0.248
0.020
C.140
0.090
0.165
0.300
0.010
C.115
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
1.100
1.100
0.700
0.900
0.600
0.400
0.700
0.450
1.900
3.900
0.750
1.150
2.300
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.010
0.025
0.080
0.020
0.016
0.072
0.072
0.045
0.030
0.210
0.095
0.130
0.060
0.055
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.020
0.045
0.035
0.025
0.025
0.080
0.008K
0.010
0.020
0.010
0.035
0.055
0.010
0.040
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
C.040
o.oao
0.040
0.050
0.030
0.010
0.030
0.040
0.040
0.060
0.1CO
0.050
0.280
K VALUE K MOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
RETRItvflL CaTE'7
/TYPA/AMHNT/STREAM
37 47 23.0 093 14 <+5.0 4
INGALLS CSEEK
29 7.i IM8ANA
T/POMME Ot TEriRE SES 091491
B^OG ON H*r AC .2 •"!! E OF nUCKABV
11EPALES 04001004
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
DATE
FROM
TO
74/09/15
74/10/19
74/11/09
74/12/14
75/01/26
75/02/22
75/03/15
75/04/19
75/05/03
75/05/17
75/06/07
75/06/21
75/07/19
75/08/23
TIME DEPTH
OF
OAY FEET
11 05
11 !)0
10 00
11 40
11 30
11 15
12 30
11 45
10 30
10 50
11 15
14 00
14 10
13 45
00630
NO?*N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.040
0.016
• 0.304
0.336
0.112
0.320
0.240
0.015
0.020
0.045
0.035
0.060
0.010
0.015
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
1.100
O.ft50
1.100
1.300
0.700
1.900
0.450
1.050
l.POO
0.950
2.800
0.300
0.700
0.700
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.010
0.015
0.150
0.025
0.016
0.040
0.016
0.025
0.220
0.330
0.250
0.015
0.085
0.025
00671
PHOS-OIS
OP.THO
MG/L P
0.010
0.010
0.01U
0.010
0.005
0.008K
0.005K
0.010
0.006
0.010
0.010
0.005
0.015
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.015
0.012
0.010
0.010
0.010K
0.010
0.010K
0.030
0.010
0.030
0.020
0.020
0.040
K VALUE KNOwh TO 8E
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
PETrtlEVAL OAT? 77/03/24
/ TYP A/ A'-'dNT/ STREAM
DATE TIME DEPTH N02&N03
FROM OF
TO DAY FEET
74/09/14
74/10/19
74/11/09
74/12/14
75/01/26
75/02/22
75/03/15
75/04/19
75/05/03
75/05/17
75/06/07
75/06/21
75/07/19
75/08/23
14
13
10
11
13
11
12
13
11
13
12
12
13
14
00
00
00
50
15
40
20
00
30
00
00
50
45
00
290201
37 40 10.0 093 23 56.0 4
PIPE* CREEK
29 7.5 CLlQUOr
T/OOMME OE TERRE RES 091491
dROG ON DIRT SO 5.2 MI N OF BOLIVAR
11EPALES • 0400100-*
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
3630
iN03
HAL
3/L
1.920
.120
.840
.600
.465
.480
.720
.500
J.095
1.570
?.300
2.100
4.300
3.600
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
1.500
0.800
1.000
1.000
1.300
3.200
1.100
1.350
0.700
0.850
1.150
0.550
1.350
7.600
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.100
0.180
0.260
0.040
0.168
0.104
0.072
0.025
0.050
0.050
C.080
C.095
0.030
0.06C
00671
PhOS-OIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.375
0.750
0.145
0.070
0.213
0.096
0.490
0.005
0.560
0.960
0.640
?.300
2.500
00665
PriOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.390
0.820
0.150
0.. 110
0.260
0.670
0.150
0.500
0.020
0.560
0.960
0.690
2.400
2.500
-------
STOKCT RETRIEVAL OAT1-: '77/0?/
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 7?/c?/->
DATE TIME DEPTH N02&N03
FROM OF
TO DAY FEET
74/09/14
74/10/19
74/11/09
74/12/14
75/01/26
75/02/22
75/03/15
75/04/19
75/05/03
75/05/17
75/06/07
75/06/21
75/07/19
75/08/23
12 45
12 25
10 40
14 15
12 05
12 55
13 00
11 55
12 45
12 45
13 00
12 45
13 30
2902F1
37 41 07.0 093 25 22.0 4
A3ELS BRANCH
29 7.0 CLIQUOT
T/POMME DE TER«E KES 091491
6SDG ON DIRT RD 5.3 MI N OF BOLIVAR
11EPALES 04001004
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
0630
I&N03
OTAL
IG/L
1.68C
0.368
2.400
1.920
1.520
0.528
1.450
1.450.
0.800
0.750
0.240
0.030
0.150
0.025
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.500
o.eoo
0.600
0.800
0.500
3.700
1.100
1.950
2.000
1.000
2.100
0.550
0.625
0.900
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.025
0.165
0.190
0.020
0.032
0.080
0.088
0.055
0.155
0.165
0.315
0.140
0.070
0.050
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.015
0.015
0.025
0.015
0.007
0.016
0.010
0.045
0.015
0.045
0.005
0.020
0.035
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.015
0.020
0.025
0.020
0.010K
0.030
0.020
0.060
0.020
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.100
K V/ALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STURET RETRIEVAL D*T£ 77/02/24
DATE TIME DEPTH N02&N03
FROM OF
TO DAY FEET
74/09/14
74/10/19
74/11/09
74/12/14
75/01/36
75/02/23
75/03/15
75/04/19
75/05/03
75/05/17
75/06/07
75/06/21
10 00
12 30
09 30
11 00
12 00
11 30
12 00
11 00
09 45
10 30
10 20
13 15
2902131
37 44 15.0 093 13 25.0 4
JORDAN CREEK
29 7.t> BUFFALO NW
T/POMME DE TERRE RtS 091491
SEC RO 8RDG 1.3 MI M JCT WITH H«Y P
11EPALES 04001004
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
0630
'«.N03
OTAL
G/L
0.052
0.048
0.590
0.528
0.325
0.336
0.410
0.155
0.100
0.090
0.055
0.065
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
1.100
0.700
1.050
1.200
1.000
1.300
1.900
1.200
0.850
0.875
1.000
0.300
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.020
0.105
0.445
0.020
C.G16
0.040
0.048
0.035
0.170
0.200
0.070
0.075
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.010
0.010
0.017
0.015
0.005K
0.008
0.005K
0.010
0.005
0.010
0.010
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.030
0.010
0.030
0.010K
0.010
0.015
0.030
0.020
K VtLUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORE! RcTRIEVftL DME 7Y/G2/Y4
/TYPA/AMbNT/STREAK
2902H1
37 42 10.0 093 13 50.0 4
BRUSH CREEK
29 7.t> BUFFALO Ntf
T/POMME DE TEtfRE SES 091491
AT CO HWY DO 6RDG
11EPALES 04001004
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
DATE
FROM
.TO
74/09/14
74/10/19
74/11/09
74/12/14
75/01/26
75/02/22
75/03/15
75/04/19
75/05/03
75/05/17
75/06/07
75/06/21
75/07/19
75/08/23
00630 00625
TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TOTAL N
DAY FEET
14
13
10
11
14
11
13
11
13
13
11
13
13
13
50
40
45
25
00
00
10
45
00
50
00
30
00
00
MG/L
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.152
.040
.810
.570
.272
.320
.470
.075
.060
.055
.025
.065
.020
.060
MG/L
1.
1.
1.
1.
0.
2.
0.
1.
0.
0.
2.
0.
0.
1.
100
100
200
400
500
300
900
800
500
700
100
800
850
850
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PHOS-DIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
015
080
345
020
016
064
072
035
035
050
100
030
050
150
MG/L P
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.005
.005
.015
.010
.009
.008K
.005K
.005
.005K
.005
.010
.010
.010
MG/L P
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.020
0.010
0.020
0.020
0.010
0.020
0.020
0.020
0.030
0.060
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL OAT'I ."
DATE TIME DEPTH
FROM OF
TO OAY FEET
74/12/10 00 00
CP(T)-
74/12/10 24 00
75/01/15 00 00
CP(T>-
75/01/15 24 00
75/02/12 11 30
CP-
75/02/13 11 30
75/03/05 09 30
CP(T>-
75/03/06 09 30
75/04/08 09 00
CP(T)-
75/04/09 09 00
75/05/08 09 00
CP(T)-
75/05/09 09 00
75/06/03 10 00
CP(T>-
75/06/04 09 00
75/08/05 10 00
CP(T)-
75/08/06 10 00
75/09/04 10 30
CP(T)-
75/09/05 10 30
75/10/09 00 00
CP(T>-
75/10/09 24 00
75/11/04 10 30
CP(T>-
75/11/05 10 30
75/12/04 10 00
CP(T>-
75/12/0^ 10 00
00630
N02&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.960
1.360
1.440
4.640
1.440
3.700
21.000
21.000
6.000
13.000
22.000
12.600
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
12.500
2.000
1.400
4.600
2.090
2.400
1.500
2.300
7.300
3.000
2.500
1.700
290206 TF2902DA POUS300
37 36 50.0 093 23 40.0 4
BOLUAR
23 7.5 BOLIVAR
T/POMME OE TERRE RES. 091491
PIPER CREEK
11EPALES 0000100*
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00610 00671 00665 50051 50053
NH3-N PHOS-OIS PHOS-TOT FLOW CONDUIT
TOTAL OHTHO RATE FLOW-MOO
MG/L MG/L P MG/L P INST MGO MONTHLY
0.310 2.400 4.250 1.060 0.828
0.365 2.700 4.200 0.675
0.370 2.350 2.600 0.820
0.080K 2.200 3.000 1.200
0.260
4.700 0.900
0.050K 6.520 6.700 0.670
0.082 8.700 9.000 0.622
0.050K 8.400 8.400 0.515
0.025 6.900 7.200 0.590
0.075 4.350 4.450 0.563
0.025K 8.800 8.900 0.557
0.025K 4.600 5.100 0.700
0.700
0.780
0.950
0.915
0.643
0.592
0.500
0.588
0.575
0.575
0.550
K VJLUE <\I.OWM ro dt
LESS THAU INDICATED
-------
5TORET PET^IEVAI DAU; 77/02/24
00630
DATE TIME DEPTH N026.N03
FROM OF N-TOTAL
TO DAY FEET MG/L
75/12/30 10 00
CP(T)-
75/12/31 10 00
5.400
7F29020A P005JOO
37 36 50.0 093 23 40.0 4
BOLIVAR
29 7.5 BOLIVAhi
T/POMME DE TE«RE rttS. 091491
PIPER CREEK
11EPALES 00001004
0000 FEET DEHTM CLASS 00
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.750
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.050
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
5.300
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
3.200
50051
FLOW
RATE '
INST MGD
0.575
50053
CONDUIT
FLOrt-MGD
MONTHLY
0.728
-------
APPENDIX E
PARAMETRIC RANKINGS OF LAKES
SAMPLED BY NES IN 1974
STATE OF MISSOURI
-------
LA»:f UATA.ro BE UStO Ifi gANKlNGS
LAKE
COOE LAKE NAME
2902 PQM"E OE TERDE
2903 STOCKTONi RESF.HVOI*
2904 LA^E TflNEYCOM0 .
2905 THOMAS HILL RESERVOIR
WAPPAPELLO
MEQIAN
TOTAL P
0.017
0 . n 4 3
O.Oc?
0.023
0.062
0.033
MEDIAN
INORG N
0.150
0.275
0.670
0.530
1.040
0.105
500-
MEAN SEC
445.000
^49.926
428. BOO
420.250
487.889
459.667
MEAN
CHLOHA
3.567
9.443
8.*73
9.^25
5.787
9.642
15-
MIN 00
10.400
14.800
15.000
11.200
11.200
11.000
MEDIAN
DISS ORTwo P
0.004
0.008
0.006
0.007
0.011
0.004
-------
PERCENT OF L'?:<'EC.. -HTH -t^t'Fp VftL'lii'j (MM'TrK -IF (.!*'*. wITH Hl^HF!-* VALUES)
LAKE MEDIAN MF.DIAN 500- . «EAN 15- MEDIAN
COOE LAKE NAME T'lTAu P INOH'J i« MEAN ^EC ' CHLO^A MIN 00 OISS 0°THO P
2901 CLEARwATEP LAK.E lOf1 (5) fln ( 4) 60 ( 3) 100 ( 5) 100 (5) ^0(4)
2902 POMME DE TEH^E riEhErtUQlH 2" ( 11 •:>"> (3) 40 ( °) *0 (2) 20 ( 1 ) . 20 ( 1)
2903 STOCKTON HESERVOIH 60 (4) 20 ( 1) 80 ( 4) hO ( 3) 0(0) hO ( 3)
2904 |_A<
------- |