U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
WORKING PAPER SERIES
REPORT
ON
THOMAS HILL RESERVOIR
MACON AND RANDOLPH COUNTIES
MISSOURI
EPA REGION VII
WORKING PAPER No, 550
CORVALLIS ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY - CORVALLIS, OREGON
and
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING & SUPPORT LABORATORY - LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
•&G.P.O. 699-440
-------
REPORT
ON
THOMAS HILL RESERVOIR
WCON AND RANDOLPH COUNTIES
MISSOURI
EPA REGION VII
WORKING PAPER No, 550
HlTH THE COOPERATION OF THE
MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
AND THE
MISSOURI NATIONAL GUARD
FEBRUARY., 1977
-------
REPORT ON THOMAS HILL RESERVOIR
MACON AND RANDOLPH COUNTIES, MISSOURI
EPA REGION VII
by
National Eutrophication Survey
Water and Land Monitoring Survey
Monitoring Applications Laboratory
Environmental Monitoring & Support Laboratory
Las Vegas, Nevada
and
Eutrophication Survey Branch
Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory
Corvallis, Oregon
Working Paper No. 550
OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
February 1977
-------
CONTENTS
Page
Foreword i i
List of Missouri Study Lakes iv
Lake and Drainage Area Map v
Sections
I. Conclusions 1
II. Lake and Drainage Basin Characteristics 3
III. Lake Water Quality Summary 5
IV. Nutrient Loadings 11
V. Literature Reviewed 16
VI. Appendices 17
-------
ii
FOREWORD
The National Eutrophicatlon Survey was Initiated in 1972 1n
response to an Administration commitment to investigate the nation-
wide threat of accelerated eutrophication to freshwater lakes and
reservoirs.
OBJECTIVES
The Survey was designed to develop, in conjunction with state
environmental agencies, information on nutrient sources, concen-
trations, and impact on selected freshwater lakes as a basis for
formulating comprehensive and coordinated national, regional, and
state management practices relating to point source discharge
reduction and nonpoint source pollution abatement in lake water-
sheds.
ANALYTIC APPROACH
The mathematical and statistical procedures selected for the
Survey's eutrophication analysis are based on related concepts
that:
a. A generalized representation or model relating
sources, concentrations, and Impacts can be
constructed.
b. By applying measurements of relevant parameters
associated with lake degradation, the generalized
model can be transformed into an operational
representation of a lake, its drainage basin, and
related nutrients.
c. With such a transformation, an assessment of the
potential for eutrophication control can be made.
LAKE ANALYSIS
In this report, the first stage of evaluation of lake and
watershed data collected from the study lake and its drainage
basin is documented. The report is formatted to provide state
environmental agencies with specific Information for basin
planning [§303(e)], water quality criteria/standards review
[§303(c)L clean lakes [§314(a,bj], and water quality monitoring
[§106 and §305(b)] activities mandated by the Federal Water
Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972.
-------
111
Beyond the single lake analysis, broader based correlations
between nutrient concentrations (and loading) and trophic condition
are being made to advance the rationale and data base for refine-
ment of nutrient water quality criteria for the Nation's freshwater
lakes. Likewise, multivariate evaluations for the relationships
between land use, nutrient export, and trophic condition, by lake
class or use, are being developed to assist 1n the formulation
of planning guidelines and policies by the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency and to augment plans implementation by the states.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The staff of the National Eutrophication Survey (Office of
Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency)
expresses sincere appreciation to the Missouri Department of Natural
Resources for professional involvement, to the Missouri National
Guard for conducting the tributary sampling phase of the Survey,
and to those Missouri wastewater treatment plant operators who
provided effluent samples and flow data.
The staff of the Missouri Department of Natural Resources,
James Wilson, Director; the Division of Environmental Quality,
Ken Karch, Director; and the Water Quality Program, James Odendahl,
Director, provided invaluable lake documentation and counsel during
the Survey, reviewed the preliminary reports and provided critiques
most useful in the preparation of this Working Paper series.
Major General Charles M. Kiefner, the Adjutant General of Missouri,
and Project Officer Captain Donald L. Well en, who directed the
volunteer efforts of the Missouri National Guardsmen, are also
gratefully acknowledged for their assistance to the Survey.
-------
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
STUDY LAKES
STATE OF MISSOURI
LAKE NAME COUNTY
Clear-water Lake Reynolds
Pomme de Terre. Reservoir Polk, Hickory
Stockton Reservoir Dade, Polk, Cedar
Lake Taneycomo Taney
/
Thomas Hill Reservoir Macon, Randolph
Lake Wappapello Wayne, Butler
-------
THOMAS HILL
RESERVOIR
(g) Tributary Sampling Site
X Lake Sampling Site
^ Drainage Area Boundary
o s 10 Km.
Scale
5 Mi.
Map Location
92'45'
39-45—
92'30'
39-30'—
-------
REPORT ON THOMAS HILL RESERVOIR, MISSOURI
STORET NO. 2905
I. CONCLUSIONS
A. Trophic Condition:*
On the basis of field observations and Survey data,
Thomas Hill Reservoir is considered eutrophic, i.e., nutrient
rich and potentially productive. Whether such nutrient en-
richment is to be considered beneficial or deleterious is
determined by its actual or potential impact upon designated
beneficial water uses of the lake.
Chlorophyll a_ levels ranged from 0.9 yg/1 in the summer
to 28.4 ug/1 in October, with a mean of 5.8 yg/1. Potential
for primary production as measured by algal assay control
yields was moderately low. Of the six Missouri lakes sampled
in 1974, none had higher median total phosphorus, median inor-
ganic nitrogen, or median dissolved orthophosphorus levels
than Thomas Hill Reservoir.
Survey limnologists did not report any nuisance conditions
during their visits to the lake. However, it was noted that
the lake was highly turbid on all sampling occasions. The low
Secchi disc transparencies (range of 0.2 to 0.5 m) coupled with
high nutrient levels suggest that primary production in the
lake is light-limited.
*See Appendix E.
-------
B. Rate-Limi ting Nutrient:
The algal assay results for Thomas Hill Reservoir indicate that
phosphorus was the primary limiting nutrient at the times samples
were collected (04/08/74, 10/06/74). The lake data further indicate
phosphorus as the limiting nutrient in the sampled waters.
C. Nutrient Controllability:
1. Point sources -
There were no known point sources impacting Thomas Hill
Reservoir during the sampling year. The present calculated
2
loading of 0.48 g P/m /yr is slightly above that proposed by
Vollenweider (1975) as eutrophic for lakes with such volume
and retention time. However, the actual annual loading may
be somewhat higher since nutrient loading for the ungaged
tributaries entering the lake were estimated from background
loadings for tributary A-2, the Middle Fork Cariton River;
the nutrient concentrations in that tributary are substantially
lower than several of the other ungaged tributaries sampled.
(see Sections IV-D,E).
2. Nonpoint sources -
The Middle Fork Cariton River accounted for 44.2% of the
total loading reaching Thomas Hill Reservoir during the sampling
year, and ungaged drainage areas were estimated to account for
52.1%.
-------
II. LAKE AND DRAINAGE BASIN CHARACTERISTICS
Lake and drainage basin characteristics are itemized below.
Lake surface area and mean depth were provided by the Missouri
Clean Water Commission. Maximum depth was estimated on the basis
of Survey data. Tributary flow data were provided by the Missouri
District Office of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). Outlet
drainage area includes the lake surface area. Mean hydraulic
retention time was obtained by dividing the lake volume by the
mean flow of the outlet. Precipitation values are estimated by
methods as outlined in National Eutrophication Survey (NES) Working
Paper No. 175. A table of metric/English conversions is included
as Appendix A.
A. Lake Morphometry:
1. Surface area: 17.81 km2.
2. Mean depth: 4.1 meters.
3. Maximum depth: 12.2 meters.
4. Volume: 73.021 x 106 m3.
5. Mean hydraulic retention time: 427 days (1.2 yrs).
-------
B. Tributary and Outlet:
(See Appendix B for flow data)
1. Tributaries -
Drainage Mean flow
Name area(km2) (m /sec)
A-2 Middle Fork Cariton River 168.3 0.94
Minor tributaries and
immediate drainage - 202.3 1.20
Totals 370.6 2.14
2. Outlet - A-l Middle Fork 388.5 1.98
Cariton River
C. Precipitation:
1. Year of sampling: 102.9 cm.
2. Mean annual: 98.3 cm.
-------
III. LAKE WATER QUALITY SUMMARY
Thomas Hill Reservoir was sampled three times during the
open-water season of 1974 by means of a-pontoon-equipped Huey
helicopter. Each time, samples for physical and chemical para-
meters were collected from three stations on the lake and from
a number of depths at each station (see map, page v). During
each visit, depth-integrated samples were collected from each
station for chlorophyll ^analysis and phytoplankton identification
and enumeration. During the first and last visits, 18.9-liter
depth-integrated samples were composited for algal assays. Maxi-
mum depths sampled were 11.0 meters at Station 01, 5.8 meters at
Station 02, and 2.4 meters at Station 03. For a more detailed
explanation of NES methods, see NES Working Paper No. 175.
The results obtained are presented in full in Appendix C and
are summarized in III-A for waters at the surface and at the maxi-
mum depth for each site. Results of the phytoplankton counts and
chlorophyll ^determinations are included in III-B. Results of
the limiting nutrient study are presented in III-C.
-------
HILL
STOR£T CCOE
PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS
PARAMETER
N«
( 4/ 8/74
S*«» = 3
*ANS£ «£01AN
)
MAX
DEPTH
WANGE
(METERS)
N*
( 6/20/74
S«»« = 3
HANGE MEDIAN
)
MAX
DEPTH
RANGE
(METEHS) N«
( 10/ 7/74
S»«» = 3
RANGE MEDIAN
)
MAX
DEPTH
RANGE
(METERS)
Tl*P£.HATUfA* Q£PTrt*«
P.H
'3
9,3- 1-0.2 9.6
•9.5- lr),2 9.6
10,2- 1:0.2 10.2
9.0- 1(0.2 10.2
12.- 126. 56.
133.- 151. 137.
7,6- ,7. 7 7,6
7.6- 7.7 7,7
41.- 73. 49.
46, - 48. 47.
0,iOBD-iO,i;25 iD.085
0.025-0,121 B,-0.76
0,!0ai-.0,02'0 0,'012
0,!OB8-0,lOa2 fl,:011
'O.»30-a,l02.0 0,945
i0.9;00-a,!00,0 0..9SO
.0,:05:0-!0,1.7.0 0,110
,'0,iOflB— 0,1SO 0,090
'O.S.'OiO-sO, 8:0.0 :e, 7 0 0
0,«:0(0-.0, 7-0.0 0.500
0.0-
2.4-
1.5-
2.4-
0.0-
2.4-
0.0-
2,4-
0.0-
2.4-
0.0-
2.4-
0.0-
2.4-
0.0-
2.4-
0.0-
2.4-
0.0-
2.4-
1.5
6.1
1.5
6.1
1.5
6.1
1.5
6.1
1.5
6.1
1.5
6.1
1.5
6.1
1.5
6.1
1.5
6.1
1.5
6.1
5
3
5
3
5
3
5
3
5
3
5
3
5
3
5
3
5
3
5
3
24.3- 25.7
21.0- 25.6
6.4- 7.2
3.8- 6.8
266.- 286.
265.- 320.
7.4- 7.9
7.3- 7.6
55.- 61.
56.- 58.
0.084-3.460
0.082-0.228
0.011-2.540
0.009-0.124
0.930-1.260
0.900-0.960
0.050-0.160
0.060-0.100
O.bOO-1.900
0.600-0.600
25.2
24.7
7.0
6.0
265.
285.
7.7
7.6
55.
57.
0.087
0.112
0.028
0.011
0.990
0.930
0.080
0.080
0.900
0.600
0.0-
1.8-
0.0-
1.8-
0.0-
1.8-
0.0-
1.8-
0.0-
1.8-
0.0-
1.8-
0.0-
1.8-
0.0-
1.8-
0.0-
1.8-
0.0-
1.6-
1.5
11.0
1.5
11.0
1.5
11.0
1.5
11.0
1.5
11.0
1.5
11.0
1.5
11.0
1.5
11.0
1.5
11.0
1.5
11.0
6
3
6
3
6
3
6
3
6
3
IS
3
6
3
6
3
6
3
6
3
13.9- 17.5
13.9- 17.3
7.4- .9.6
7.4- 9.0
24U.- 260.
247.- 257.
7.5- 7.8
7.5- 7.8
64.- 67.
04.- 67.
0.031-0.069
0.030-0.061
0.004-0.017
0.004-0.007
0.210-0.600
0.210-0.570
0.020-0.050
0.020-0.030
0.500-1.100
0.400-0.800
15.8
14.9
8.8
8.4
254.
252.
7.7
7.7
66.
64.
0.042
0.036
o.oor
0.006
0.560
0.500
0.030
0.020
0.850
0.500
0.0-
1.5-
0.0-
1.5-
0.0-
1.5-
0.0-
1.5-
0.0-
1.5-
0.0-
1.5-
0.0-
1.5-
0.0-
1.5-
0.0-
1.5-
0.0-
1.5-
1.5
8.5
1.5
8.5
1.5
8.5
1.5
8.5
1.5
a. 5
1.5
8.5
1.5
8.5
1.5
8.5
1.5
8.5
1.5
8.5
M5C iC«ETtKS»
~ .'0,3
0.3
0,2- 0.3
0.2
0.3- 0.5
0.3
« 'N •= WO,. OF SAMPLES
•»» mxJtMUM DEPTH SAMPLED AT EACH SITE
••»» "5 = MO, OF SITES SAMPLED ON THIS DATE
-------
B. Biological Characteristics:
1. Phytoplankton -
Sampling
Date
04/08/74
06/20/74
10/07/74
Dominant
Genera
1.
2.
3.
4.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Chroomonas
Cryptomonas
Schroederia
Nitzschia
Other genera
Total
Chroomonas
Stephanodiscus
Cryptomonas
Melosira
Closterium
Other genera
Total
Algal
Units
per ml
140
94
94
47
375
253
253
211
169
42
928
Stephanodiscus
Nitzschia
Melosira
Skeletonema
Chroomonas
2,045
1,217
682
682
341
Other genera 1,070
Total 6,037
-------
2. Chlorophyll a^ -
Sampling Station Chlorophyll
Date Number (yg/1)
04/08/74 01 2.1
02 2.2
03
06/20/74 01 0.9
02 2.4
03 2.3
10/07/74 01 3.2
02 4.8
03 28.4
-------
C. Limiting Nutrient Study:
1. Autoclaved, filtered, and nutrient spiked -
a. 04/08/74
2.
Ortho P
Inorganic N Maximum Yield
Spike (mg/1) Cone, (mg/1) Cone, (mg/1) (mg/1-dry wt.)
Control
0.05 P
0.05 P + 1.0 N
1.00 N
b. 10/06/74
Ortho P
0.005
0.055
0.055
0.005
0.940
0.940
1.940
1.940
0.2
8.0
8.4
0.2
Inorganic N Maximum Yield
Spike (mg/1) Cone, (mg/1) Cone, (mg/1) (mg/1-dry wt.)
Control 0.005
0.05 P 0.055
0.05 P + 1.0 N 0.055
1.00 N 0.005
0.475
0.475
1.475
1.475
0.8
9.6
15.9
0.8
Discussion -
The control yield of the assay alga, Selenastrum capri-
cornutum, indicates that the potential for primary production
in Thomas Hill Reservoir was low at the time of spring samp-
ling and moderate during fall. On both sampling occasions,
an increase in growth yield with the addition of phosphorus,
as well as the lack of increase with the addition of nitrogen
alone, indicates phosphorus limitation. Maximum growth yield
was achieved with the simultaneous addition of both nutrients.
It should be noted, however, that phosphorus levels in the
control samples were generally much lower than determined for
preserved lake water samples. This loss of phosphorus in the
-------
10
assay samples probably accounts for the apparent low to moderate
control yield.
Mean N/P ratios were 90/1 and 69/1 in the spring and
autumn sampling data, indicating phosphorus limitation at those
times. N/P ratios in the summer were 80/1 for Stations 02 and
03, but only 2/1 for Station 01 due to the inordinately high
o
surface phosphorus values observed during June at that station.
-------
11
IV. NUTRIENT LOADINGS
(See Appendix D for data)
For the determination of nutrient loadings, the Missouri
National Guard collected monthly near-surface grab samples0from
each of the tributary sites indicated on the map (page v), ex-
cept for the high runoff months of October, April, and May when
two samples were collected. Sampling was begun in September
1974, and was completed in August 1975.
Through an interagency agreement, stream flow estimates for
the year of sampling and a "normalized" or average year were pro-
vided by the Missouri District Office of the USGS for the tribu-
tary sites nearest the lake.
In this report, nutrient loads for sampled tributaries were
determined by using a modification of a USGS computer program for
calculating stream loadings. Nutrient loads indicated for tribu-
taries are those measured minus known point source loads, if any.
Nutrient loadings for unsampled "minor tributaries and imme-
diate drainage" ("ZZ" of USGS) were estimated by using the mean
annual nutrient loads, in kg/km2/yr, for the Middle Fork Cariton
River at Station A-2, and multiplying the means by the ZZ area in
km2.
-------
12
A. Waste Sources:
1. Known municipal - None known.
2. Known industrial - None known.
ft
B. Annual Total Phosphorus Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
% of
Source kg P/yr total
a. Tributaries (nonpoint load) -
A-2 Middle Fork Cariton River 3,770 44.2
b. Minor tributaries and immediate
drainage (nonpoint load) - 4,450 52.1
c. Known municipal STP's - None
d. Septic tanks* - 5 0.1
e. Known industrial - None
f. Direct precipitation** - 310 3.6
Totals 8,535 100.0
2. Output - A-l Middle Fork 3,700
Cariton River
3. Net annual P accumulation - 4,835
*Estimate based on 20 lakeshore residences.
**Estimate (see NES Working Paper No. 175):
-------
13
C. Annual Total Nitrogen Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
% of
Source kg N/yr total
a. Tributaries (nonpoint load) -
A-2 Middle Fork Cariton River 83,690 41.1
b. Minor tributaries and immediate
drainage (nonpoint load) - 100,545 49.4
c. Known municipal STP's - None
d. Septic tanks* - 215 0.1
e. Known industrial - None
f. Direct precipitation** - 19.230 9.4
Totals 203,680 100.0
2. Output - A-l Middle Fork 107,770
Cariton River
3. Net annual N accumulation - 95,910
*Estimated based on 20 lakeshore residences.
**Estimated (see NES Working Paper No. 175).
-------
14
D. Mean annual Nonpoint Nutrient Export by Subdrainage Area:
7 7
Tributary kg P/knr/yr kg N/km /yr
Middle Fork Cariton River 22 497
E. Mean Nutrient Concentrations in Ungaged Streams:
Mean Total P Mean Total N
Tributary (mg/1) (mg/1)
A-3 Middle Fork Cariton River 0.138 2.296
A-4 Middle Fork Cariton River 0.254 2.849
B-l Stinking Creek 0.193 2.775
B-2 Stinking Creek 0.175 2.764
C-l North Fork Claybank Creek 0.068 2.038
D-l Sweezer Creek 0.160 2.400
E-l Unnamed Creek 0.044 1.067
F-l Unnamed Creek 0.093 1.161
Nutrient concentrations for the ungaged tributaries C-l, E-l,
and F-l are in line with site A-2, the Middle Fork Cariton River,
while phosphorus levels for the remaining ungaged tributaries are
much higher than at Station A-2.
-------
15
F. Yearly Loadings:
In the following table, the existing phosphorus annual
loading is compared to the relationship proposed by Vollenweider
(1975). Essentially his eutrophic loading is that at which
the receiving waters would become eutrophic or remain eutrophic;
his oligotrophic loading is that which would result in the
receiving water remaining oligotrophic or becoming oligotrophic
if morphometry permitted. A mesotrophic loading would be
considered one between eutrophic and oligotrophic.
Note that Vollenweider's model may not apply to lakes with
short hydraulic retention times or in which light penetration is
severely restricted by high concentrations of suspended solids
in the surface waters.
Total Yearly
Phosphorus Loading
(g/m2/yr)
Estimated loading for Thomas Hill Reservoir 0.48
Vollenweider's eutrophic loading 0.36
Vollenweider's oligotrophic loading 0.18
-------
16
V. LITERATURE REVIEWED
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1975. National Eutro-
phication Survey Methods 1973-1976. Working Paper No. 175.
National Environmental Research Center, Las Vegas, Nevada,
and Pacific Northwest Environmental Research Laboratory,
Corvallis, Oregon.
Vollenweider, R. A. 1975. Input-Output Models With Special
Reference to the Phosphorus Loading Concept in Limnology.
Schweiz. Z. Hydrol. 37:53-84.
-------
17
VI. APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
CONVERSION FACTORS
-------
CONVERSION FACTORS
Hectares x 2.471 = acres
Kilometers x 0.6214 = miles
Meters x 3.281 = feet
Cubic meters x 8.107 x 10 = acre/feet
Square kilometers x 0.3861 - square miles
Cubic motors/sec x 35.315 = cubic feet/sec
Centimeters x 0.3937 = inches
Kilograms x 2.205 ~ pounds
Kilograms/square kilometer x 5.711 = Ibs/square mile
-------
APPENDIX B
TRIBUTARY FLOW DATA
-------
TRIBUTARY FLOW INFORMATION TOR MISSOURI
02/24/77
LAKE CODE 2905 THOMAS HILL RESERVOIR
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA 'OF LAKE(SO KM)
SUB-DRAINAGE
TRIBUTARY AREA(SO KM)
2905A1
2905A2
2905ZZ
388.5
168.3
220.1
0.65
0.82
FF3
2.63
1.25
1.59
388.5
MAS
APR
2.69 3.68
1.19 1.70
1.50 2.15
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA OF LAKE =
SUM OF SUB-DRAINAGE AREAS =
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS(CMS)
TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAR MEAN FLOW DAY
2905A1
2905A2
29U5ZZ
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
S
b
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
74
74
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
74
' 74
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
74
74
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
1.699
0.850
0.906
0.708
0.991
4.248
2.407
4.248
2.265
2.265
1.416
0.425
0.011
0.028
0.425
0.368
0.425
1.982
1.133
1.982
1.274
0.425
0.042
0.057
0.311
0.340
0.793
0.765
0.82)
2.803
1.727
2.803
1.897
0.850
0.340
0.340
14
5
7
4
1
2
8
4
7
13
16
14
5
7
4
1
1
5
4
8
12
16
MAY
2.80
1.36
1.73
388.5
388.5
NORMALIZED FLOWS(CMS)
JUN JUL AUG
FLOW
0.425
0.566
1.416
3.964
4.248
2.549
3.115
2.832
4.531
0.850
0.703
0.014
0.011
0.680
0.708
1.133
0.991
1.416
0.283
0.170
0.014
0.003
DAY
27
19
17
27
19
17
3.6d
1.73
2.21
2.10
1.05
1.33
0.63
0.42
0.54
SEP
1.25
0.68
0.85
OCT
1.02
0.57
0.74
NOV
0.96
0.45
0.57
DEC
0.71
0.34
0.42
MEAN
1.98
0.94
1.20
SUMMARY
TOTAL FLOW IN
TOTAL FLOW OUT
25.62
23.87
FLOW DAY
0.708
3.256
3.964
0.017
0.425
0.184
FLOW
-------
APPENDIX C
PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL DATA
-------
STOREY RETRIEVAL DATE 77/02/24
290501
39 31 29.0 092 36 12.0
THOMAS HILL RESERVOIR
29175
091391
/TYPA/AMyNT/LAKF!
HEPALES
04001002
002tt FEET DEPTH CLASS
DATE
FROM
TO
74/04/08
74/06/20
74/10/07
DATE
FROM
TO
74/04/08
74/06/30
74/10/07
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
13 05 0000
13 05 0005
13 05 0015
13 05 0020
11 30 0000
1 30 0005
1 30 001S
1 30 0025
1 30 0030
1 30 0036
1 30 0000
1 30 0005
11 30 0015
11 30 0028
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
13 05 0000
13 05 0005
13 05 0015
13 05 0020
11 30 0000
11 30 0005
11 30 0015
1 30 0025
1 30 0030
1 30 0036
1 30 0000
1 30 0004
1 30 0005
1 30 0015
1 30 0028
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
10.2
10.2
10.2
10.2
24.3
24.3
aa.3
21. d
21.2
21.0
17.5
17.5
17.5
17.3
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.082
0.080
0.078
0.078
3.480
0.084
0.103
0.099
0.126
0.228
0.042
0.031
0.028
0.036
00300
DO
MG/L
10.
10.
9.
7.
6.
5.
5.
4.
3.
8.
8.
8.
8.
32217
00077
TRANSP
SECCHI
INCHES
12
2
2
0
0 9
4
8
6
6
8
4 18
6
6
4
00031
00094
CNDUCTVY
FIELD
MICROMHO
13
63
130
137
285
280
269
264
268
320
257
260
259
257
00400
PH
SU
7.70
7.60
7.60
7.60
7.90
7.60
7.51
7.40
7.40
7.30
7.52
7.64
7.58
7.49
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
73
41
45
47
61
55
55
54
56
57
66
64
65
64
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.100
0.050
0.080
0.080
0.160
0.080
0.070
0.080
0.090
0.100
0.050
0.030
0.030
0.030
00
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.800
0.500
0.500
0.400
1.900
0.700
0.600
0.600
0.600
0.600
1.100
0.500
0.500
0.500
00630
N026.N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.940
0.950
1.000
0.980
1.260
1.000
0.970
1.030
0.970
0.930
0.600
0.580
0.580
0.570
00671
PHOS-olS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.011
0.020
0.010
0.008
2.540
0.038
0.051
0.018
0.018
0.124
0.017
0.007
0.005
0.007
CHLRPHYL INCDT LT
A .
UG/L
2.
0.
3.
REMNING
PERCENT
1
9
2
1.0
-------
STORET *ETRICVAL DATE 77/02/24
290502
39 35 59.0 092 38 12.0 3
THOMAS HIL1 RESERVOIR
29175 MISSOURI
091391
/TYPA/AMB'NT/LAKE
11EPALES 04001002
0023 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
DATE
F^OM
TO
74/04/08
74/06/20
74/10/07
DATE
FROM
TO
74/04/08
74/06/20
74/10/07
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
13 30 0000
13 30 0005
13 30 0015
12 00 0000
12 00 0005
12 00 0010
12 00 0015
12 00 0019
12 00 0000
12 00 0005
12 00 0018
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
13 30 0000
13 30 0005
13 30 0015
12 00 0000
12 00 0005
12 00 0010
12 00 0015
12 00 0019
12 00 0000
12 00 0003
12 00 0005
12 00 0018
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
9.7
9.6
9.6
25.2
25.4
24.9
24.7
24.7
15.9
15.8
14.9
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.089
0.081
0.025
0.087
0.085
0.076
0.086
0.082
0.042
0.033
0.030
00300 00077
DO TRANSP
MG/L
10
10
7
7
7
7
6
9
9
9
3221
SECCHI
INCHES
12
.2
.2
.0 8
.2
.0
.2
.0
.0 18
.2
.0
7 00031
00094
CNDUCTVY
FIELO
MICROMHO
12
51
133
286
286
286
285
285
252
248
247
00400
PH
SU
7.60
7.60
7.70
7.70
7.40
7.60
7.60
7.60
7.64
7.69
7.74
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
48
48
46
55
57
54
55
58
65
64
64
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.120
0.070
0.090
0.080
0.050
0.050
0.070
0.060
0.040
0.030
0.020
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.800
0.500
0.500
0.900
0.600
0.600
0.500
0.600
1.100
0.500
0.400
00630
N02(.N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
1.020
0.970
1.000
0.960
0.990
1.030
1.000
0.900
0.560
0.560
0.500
00671
PHOS-OIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.013
0.012
0.012
0.028
0.013
0.011
0.010
0.009
0.010
0.006
0.006
CHLRPHYL INCOT LT
A
UG/L
2
2
4
REMNING
PERCENT
.2
.4
.8
ItO
-------
.TORET RETRIEVAL OATE 77/02/24
290503
39 37 29.0 092 37 20.0
THOMAS MILL RESc«VOIf<
29121 MISSOURI
091391
11EPALES 04001002
0011 FEET OE^Tn CLASS 00
DATE
FROM
TO
74/04/oa
74/06/20
74/10/07
OATE
FROM
TO
74/04/08
74/06/20
74/10/07
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
13 50 OOUO
13 50 0005
13 50 0008
12 45 0000
12 4? 0006
13 30 COOO
12 30 0005
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
13 50 0000
13 50 0005
13 50 0008
12 45 0000
12 45 0006
12 30 0000
12 30 0003
12 30 0005
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
9.5
9.3
9.5
25.7
25.6
14.0
13.9
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.125
0.093
0.121
0.124
0.112
0.069
0.061
00300 00077 00094 00400 00410 00610 00625 00630 00671
DO TRANSP CNOUCTVY PH T ALK NHS-N TUT KJEL N02kN03 PHOS-UIS
SECCHl FIELD CAC03 TOTAL N N-TOTAL ORTrtO
MG/L INCHES MICROMHO SU
9 60 7.70
1C. 2 126 7.70
10.2 151 7.70
6.8 10 266 7.80
6.8 265 7.60
9.6 13 255 7.83
7.4 352 7.75
32217 00031
CHLRPHYL INCOT LT
A REMNING
UG/L PERCENT
2.3
28.4
1.0
MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L
51 0.170 0.800 0.930
49 0.170 0.600 0.940
48 0.150 0.700 0.900
55 0.100 0.900 0.930
56 0.080 0.600 0.960
67 0.030 0.900 0.230
67 0.020 0.800 0.210
MG/L P
0.015
0.012
0.011
0.011
0.011
0.008
0.004
-------
APPENDIX D
TRIBUTARY DATA
-------
STOftET RETRIEVAL DATE 77/03/24
/TYPA/AMdNT/STREAM
DATE
FROM OF
TO DAY
TIME DEPTH
FEET
74/09/14
74/10/05
74/10/27
74/13/07
75/01/04
75/02/01
75/03/02
75/04/08
75/04/19
75/05/04
75/05/17
75/06/07
75/07/13
75/08/16
10 30
09 30
13 30
09 05
14 00
09 55
09 35
12 00
08 55
15 30
09 00
09 30
09 30
09 20
2905A1
39.30 52.0 092 39 54.0 4
MID FORK C'MRITON
29 7.5 PRAIRIE
0/TMOMAS. HILL RE.
MO HWY 3
11EPALES
i ILL
091391
BRDG .5 MI S« OF THOMAS HILL
04001004
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
0630
!«>N03
OTAL
IG/L
C.480
0.464
5.336
0.400
0.352
0.397
0.432
0.490
0.500
0.550
0.580
0.630
0.450
0.260
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
1.700
0.800
1.700
1.400
1.400
1.700
0.820
1.400
1.450
0.700
i.ion
1.250
0.750
1.150
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.020
0.300
0.035
0.090
0.104
0.176
0.024
0.070
0.030
0.080
0.120
0.030
0.030
0.060
00671
PHOS-OIS
OKTHO
MG/L P
0.005
0.005K
0.005*
0.010
0.005
O.OOBK
0.008K
0.005K
0.015
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.005K
0.005
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.060
0.055
0.040
0.080
0.040
0.050
0.079
0.040
0.050
0.060
0.090
0.070
0.040
0.080
K VALUE KNOWN TO 6£
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORE.! ^E
77/02/24
DATE TIMf DEPTH N02WM03
FROM OF
TO* DAY FEET
74/09/14
74/10/05
74/12/07
75/01/04
75/0 ^/01
75/03/01
75/04/05
75/04/19
75/05/04
75/05/17
75/06/08
75/07/12
75/08/16
15 40
10 40
14 45
11 00
10 45
11 15
11 35
11 00
10 15
10 ??
12 OH
10 50
10 40
10 30
290SA2
39 44 23.0 09? 36 30.0 4
MID FORK C-"V»ITON Rlv£«
?9 7.b 8EVIER SOUTH
T/THCHAS HILL RESEKVoI* 0913*1
SEC RO 6*00 2.5 MI ESE OF BEVIER
11E»ALES G4001004
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
0630 00625
«nN03 TOT KJEL
OTAL N
6/L MG/L
0.040 1.309
0.016 0.600
0.024 1.300
1.520 3.600
0.774 2.000
a. 610 a. POO
1.100
1.160
0.012 <
0.200 (
0.045
1.500
0.060
0.010
.630
.450
>.700
.800
.C30
.900
.250
.050
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
3.100
0.095
0.110
0.155
C.376
0.096
a. 128
0.125
0.037
0.025
0.175
0.060
0.070
0.030
00671
PHOS-OIS
OPTHO
MG/L P
0.005K
0.005K
0.010
0.035
0.010
0.016
0.020
0.015
0.010
0.005
0.020
0.005
0.010
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.030
0.040
0.080
0.070
0.100
0.205
0.18C
0.100
0.070
0.035
0.130
0.030
0.070
H VALUE KNOWN TO dE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE-77/0?/2-»
/TYPA/AM8NT/STREAM
2905A3
39 46 00.0 092 34 20.0 4
MID FORK CHARITON rfivEtf
29 MACON co H«Y HAP
T/THOMAS HILL KESEMVGIK 091391
CO HWY 00 tiRDG 3 MI N OF BEVIER
11EPALES C400I004
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
DATE
FROM
TO
74/09/14
74/10/12
74/11/02
74/12/07
75/01/04
75/02/01
75/03/01
75/04/05
75/04/19
75/05/04
75/05/17
75/06/07
75/06/22
75/07/12
75/08/23
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY
12
12
11
12
10
10
11
11
14
11
10
10
12
08
10
FEET
00
35
10
05
45
30
00
30
45
30
50
40
50
30
45
00630 00625
N02&N03 TOT KJEL
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.330
0.032
0.016
1.760
0.920
0.528
1.250
1.150
0.005
0.400
0.155
1.950
0.040
0.195
G.010
N
MG/L
1.200
1.700
1.700
3.700
1.300
0.700
1.950
1.750
0.600
2.900
0.800
2.200
1.400
1.150
1.650
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.025
0.050
0.037
0.075
0.104
0.056
0.084
0.085
0.005
0.050
0.035
0.200
0.030
0.080
0.035
00671 00665
PHOS-OIS PHOS-TOT
OPTHO
MG/L P
0.020
0.025
0.035
0.045
0.010
0.016
0.025
0.025
0.015
0.015
0.010
0.025
0.010
0.010
0.020
MG/L P
0.120
0.130
0.170
0.350
0.060
0.050
0.200
0.180
0.090
0.120
0.060
0.180
0.120
0.090
0.150
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 77/02/24
/TYPA/AMSNT/STPEAM
DATE TIME DEPTH N026.N03
F&OM or
TO GAY FEET
74/09/14
74/10/12
74/11/02
74/12/07
75/01/04
75/02/01
75/03/01
75/04/05
75/04/19
75/05/04
75/05/17
75/06/07
75/08/23
12 30
12 50
50
20
10
00
25
00
11
12
11
11
11
12
15 05
11 50
11 ?0
11 10
10 30
2905A4
39 52 30.0 092 33 40.0 4
MID FORK r-.ARITON RIVER
29 MACON CO HwY MAP
T/THOMAS "ILL RESERVOIR 091391
SEC HO 6ROG 5 MI WSW OF ATLANTA
11EPALES 04001004
0000 FEET DEPTh CLASS 00
0630
6.N03
OTAL
G/L
0.128
0.040
0.490
2.000
0.815
0.464
1.600
1.570
0.280
0.345
0.270
1.700
0.030
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
1.600
6.000
2.350
3.200
1.400
1.000
1.400
2.400
2.000
1.050
1.350
1.550
2.000
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.063
0.050
0.070
0.085
•3.256
0.040
0.096
0.075
0.055
0.050
0.060
0.0.45
0.045
00671
PHOS-OIS
OPTHO
MG/L P
0.005
0.045
0.020
0.060
0.015
0.016
0.020
0.020
0.035
0.010
0.010
0.015
0.030
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.060
1.250
0.360
0.250
0.090
0.090
0.1 40
0.230
0.330
0.100
0.070
0.210
0.120
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 77/02/2'*
/ TYP A/ A«8NT/ ST«E.AM
DATE TIME DEPTH N02S.N03
FROM OF
TO DAY FEET
290561
39 40 06.6 092 39 06.0 4
STINKING CfTEK
29 7.5 LAGONDA
T/THOMAS rtlLL RESERVOIR 091391
SEC RO BRUG 6 MI S OF CALLAO
11EPALES 04001004
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
74/09/14
74/10/05
74/10/27
74/12/07
75/01/04
75/02/01
75/03/02
75/04/08
75/04/19
75/05/04
75/05/17
75/06/07
75/07/12
75/08/16
11 05
09 50
14 00
13 25
14 30
10 20
10 00
14 30
09 15
15 00
10 00
10 00
10 30
10 15
0630
!6,N03
OTAL
IG/L
0.152
0.056
0.032
1.320
1.500
0.760
1.570
1.350
0.005
0.150
0.210
1.200
0.020
C.020
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
2.400
2.000
2.100
3.100
1.900
1.200
1.150
2.900
2.400
1.550
2.100
4.400
1.300
2.000
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.070
0.360
0.035
0.310
0.368
0.152
0.156
0.570
G.140
0.050
0.090
0.080
0.080
0.230
00671
PHOS-IIIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.010
0.010
0.015
0.140
0.030
0.0^0
0.016
0.040
0.015
0.020
0.025
0.030
0.040
0.025
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.095
0.155
0.160
0.460
U.I 80
0.150
0.030
0.235
0.100
0.160
0.380
0.200
0.210
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE "'7/02/24
/TYPA/AM8NT/STPEAM
00630
DATE TIME DEPTH N02MM03
FROM OF N-TOTAL
TO DAY FEET MG/L
74/10/05
74/10/27
74/12/07
75/01/05
75/02/01
75/03/01
75/04/05
75/04/19
75/05/04
75/05/17
75/06/08
75/07/12
75/08/16
15 20
10 ?0
14 20
10 ?5
10 ?0
10 15
10 40
10 40
09 50
10 00
10 15
10 35
10 20
10 15
o.ioe
0.032
0.032
2.320
1.540
1.010
1.900
1.250
0.005
0.025
0.030
0.750
0.120
0.020
00625
TOT KJEU
N
MG/L
1.400
2.000
?.200
2.700
1.400
1.300
1.950
1.950
0.950
1.100
2.300
3.150
2.750
4.400
290582
39 46 50.0 092 38 00.0 4
STINMNG C"EEK
29 MACON CO rtwY MAP
T/THOMAS MILL RESERVOIR
SEC RD 8RDG 1
11EPALES
091391
5 MI NW OF CALLAO
04001004
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.060
0.280
0.315
0.165
0.368
P. 280
0.224
0.530
0.030
0.610
0.140
0.145
0.390
0.300
00671
PrIOS-DIS
ORTMO
MG/L P
0.020
0.015
0.030
0.125
0.012
0.016
G.008
0.025
0.015
0.010
0.010
0.030
0.020
0.045
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.185
0.185
0.250
0.280
0.070
0.090
0.140
0.140
0.09S
0.130
0.130
0.260
0.320
-------
STOSET RETRIEVAL DATE 77/02/24
/TVP.A/AMBNT/ST9F.AM
2405C1
39 40 00.0 092 35 27.0 4
N FORK CLAY8ANK CREEK
29 7.5 BEVIER SOUTH
T/THOMAS MILL RESERVOIR 091391
SEC RD bRDG 5.5 MI S OF riEVIER
11EPALES 0*001004
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
DATE
FROM
TO
74/09/14
74/10/05
74/10/27
74/12/07
75/01/04
75/02/01
75/04/08
75/04/19
75/05V04
75/05/17
75/06/07
75/07/12
75/08/16
00630 00625
TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TOTAL N
DAY FEET
11 30
10 15
14 15
10 05
15 00
11 00
15 15
10 00
14 00
10 30
11 00
10 45
11 00
10 45
MG/L
0.060
0.024
0.056
0.690
1.500
0.768
0.270
0.095
0.115
0.390
0.050
0.130
0.030
0.070
MG/L
2.303
2.000
1.600
2.600
2.400
1.900
1.450
0.900
1.150
0.600
1.300
1.800
1.880
2.400
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PHOS-DIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL ORTrtO
MG/L
1.900
1.600
0.890
0.390
0.320
0.144
0.200
0.330
0.230
0.050
0.925
0.610
1 .880
1.900
MG/L P
0.010
0.015
0.005
0.020
0.055
0.040
0.005
0.005
0.005K
0.005K
0.005K
0.005K
0.015
0.025
MG/L P
0.015
0.020
0.010K
0.160
0.300
0.150
0.010
0.020
0.030
0.010
0.010K
0.010
0.030
0.060
K VALUE.' KNO»(N TO 8E
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STOSET RETRIEVAL DATE 77/02/24
/TfPA/A"1BNT/STREAM
DATE TIME DEPTH N02S.N03
FROM OF
TO DAY FEET
74/09/14
74/10/12
74/11/02
74/12/07
75/01/04
75/02/01
75/03/01
75/04/05
75/04/19
75/05/03
75/05/17
75/06/07
75/06/22
75/07/12
11 45
12 25
11 05
11 50
10 00
10 10
10 50
11 00
14 30
10 45
10 30
11 50
10 10
12 35
08 20
2S-0501
39 47 45.0 092 36 40.0 4
SWEEZE-} CRPF.K
29 MACGN co HWY MAP
T/THOMAS HILL RESERVOIR 091391
SEC KD B*DG 2 MI NNE OF CALLAO
IIE^ALES 04001004
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
0630
S.N03
OTAL
G/L
0.240
0.040
0.024
1.920
0.965
0.528
1.150
1.150
0.005
0.200
0.210
3.035
0.920
0.010
0.200
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
4.800
2.700
1.400
3.300
1.500
1.500
1.900
3.000
1.800
1.500
1.650
0.100
1.550
1.250
1.450
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.065
0.315
0.040
0.100
0.086
0.064
0.112
0.070
0.060
0.075
0.070
0.030
0.110
0.035
0.075
00671
PHOS-OIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.030
0.050
0.045
0.060
0.016
0.016
0.008
0.020
0.015
0.010
0.010
0.005K
0.025
0.015
0.010
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.130
0.460
0.160
0.270
o.oao
0.050
o ; 1 50
0.195
0.130
0.100
0.090
O.U10K
0.210
0.110
0.100
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 77/D2/24
/TYPA/AMdNT/STREAM
FEET
2905E1
39 49 40.0 092 40 45.0 4
UNNAMED CSIEK
?9 MACON CO HwY MAP
T/THOMAS HILL RESE^VUIK 091391
CO HWY UU 5 MI Nrt OF CALLAO
11EPALES 04001004
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
DATE
FROM
TO
74/09/14
74/10/05
74/10/27
74/12/07
75/01/05
75/02/01
75/03/01
75/04/05
75/04/19
75/05/03
75/05/17
75/06/08
75/07/12
75/08/16
TIME
OF
DAY 1
15 00
10 00
14 00
10 05
10 05
10 ?5
10 ?Q
10 ?.S
09 35
09 50
10 00
10 15
10 05
10 00
00630
N02^sN03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.036
0.016
0.016
0.312
0.204
0.168
0.230
0.185
0.210
0.280
0.035
0.310
0.020
0.015
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
1.300
0.900
0.500
1.200
0.600
0.900
1.550
1.100
1.050
0.450
0.650
0.450
0.650
1.400
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.315
0.350
0.185
0.145
0.092
0.136
0.232
0.075
0.015
0.020
0.090
0.030
0.240
0.160
00671
PHOS-OIS
OPTHO
MG/L P
0.005K
0.005K
0.015
0.040
0.010
0.032
0.008K
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.005
0.015
0.005
0.005
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L i»
0.035
0.045
0.030
0.150
0.010
0.050
0.060
0.050
0.020
0.020
0.010
0.020
0.070
0.050
K VALUE KNOWN TO 6E
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
RETRIEVAL DATE 77/o^/24
/TYPA/AKBNT/STREAM
DATE TIME DEPTH N02S.N03
FROM OF
TO DAY FEET
74/1 1/02
74/12/07
75/02/01
75/03/01
75/04/05
75/04/19
75/05/03
75/05/17
75/06/07
75/07/12
10
11
09
10
10
14
10
09
09
08
50
25
30
10
30
10
00
50
30
00
29051F
39 54 10.0 092 39 20.0 4
UNNAMED CRP^K
?9 MACON CO H*Y MAP
T/THOMAS MILL RESEKVOIR 091391
co HWY HH 4 MI s OF ELMER
11EDALES 04001004
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
0630
S.N03
OTAL
G/L
0.056
0.368
C.128
0.260
0.195
0.045
0.045
0.015
0.040
0.260
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
1.100
1.500
0.650
0.500
0.650
1.900
0.150
1.750
0.550
1.450
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.150
0.090
0.048
C.088
0.040
0.025
0.015
0.027
0.021
0.115
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.015
0.045
0.016
0.016
0.020
0.025
0.015
0.027
0.020
0.015
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.060
0.190
0.025
0.100
0.090
0.050
0.030
0.210
0.080
0.090
-------
APPENDIX E
PARAMETRIC RANKINGS OF LAKES
SAMPLED BY NES IN 1974
STATE OF MISSOURI
-------
K' fiftTft TO BE USPO IN
CODf
2901 CL£Af*ATE~- tAr-F
?9o? POM'-'E OE TE^^R:
STOCKTON
LAKF. TANEVCOM0
290^ THOMAS HILL
TOT/SL a
r-.nif
O.n»3
0.02?
0.«<3
o.nfez
0.033
MEDIAN
INO->G fv
0.1 bO
0.275
0.670
0.530
1.040
0.105
SOO-
Mfar, SEC
44S.OOO
449.928
42B.aoo
420.250
487.889
459.667
"-lEAM
CHLORA
3.567
9.*43
8.973
9.B25
5.787
9.642
15-
MIN oo
10.400
14.HOO
15.000
11.200
11.200
11.000
MEDIAN
DISb 0»THO o
0.004
o.ooe
0.006
0.007
0.011
0.004
-------
fJtPCE'-.'T OF L^*?*1 «ItH HlOhF- VALl
LAKE
CO'JK Li'-E NAvf.
?<«i;l CLKi^»ATf} L---E
?QO;> priMvE Ofc TF.w-f'' •^E'-ERVOjM
2903 STOCKTON ^EScKVOIv-
2904 LAKE IANEVCOM0
290S THOMAS MILL i-ESfc^vOIn
290^1 WflD'JAPELLO RESFHVOI9
JF9 (NU^^F^ OF" L'
» E n I A N
TOTAL ~
1 o ''; ( S )
2" ( 1)
H 0 ( 4 )
60 ( 3)
01 0)
40 ( ?)
IKES w i T ii HI'
«EO]
Ii-iO'-
HO
eo
20
<*0
0
100
[ AM
'b N
(
"0 ( 2)
60 ( 3)
01 0)
tiO ( *)
20 < 11
1S-
MlN 00
100 ( 5)
20 ( 1 )
0 ( 0)
50 ( ?)
50 ( 2)
dO ( 4)
MEDIAN
oiss O«T>-O P
<»0 I 4)
20 ( 1 )
eo ( i)
40 ( ?)
o ( n>
90 ( 4)
NO
------- |