U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
               NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
                        WORKING PAPER SERIES

                                              REPORT
                                                ON
                                         THOMAS HILL RESERVOIR
                                      MACON AND RANDOLPH COUNTIES
                                             MISSOURI
                                           EPA REGION VII
                                         WORKING PAPER No, 550
     CORVALLIS ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY - CORVALLIS, OREGON
                                  and
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING & SUPPORT LABORATORY - LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
•&G.P.O. 699-440

-------
                                 REPORT
                                   ON
                          THOMAS HILL RESERVOIR
                       WCON AND RANDOLPH COUNTIES
                                MISSOURI
                             EPA REGION VII
                          WORKING PAPER No,  550
       HlTH THE COOPERATION OF THE
MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
                 AND THE
         MISSOURI NATIONAL GUARD
              FEBRUARY., 1977

-------
       REPORT ON THOMAS HILL RESERVOIR

    MACON AND RANDOLPH COUNTIES, MISSOURI

               EPA REGION VII


                     by

       National Eutrophication Survey

      Water and Land Monitoring Survey
     Monitoring Applications Laboratory
Environmental Monitoring & Support Laboratory
              Las Vegas, Nevada

                     and

        Eutrophication Survey Branch
 Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory
              Corvallis, Oregon
            Working Paper No. 550
     OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
    U.S.  ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

                February 1977

-------
                               CONTENTS

                                                       Page
Foreword                                                i i
List of Missouri Study Lakes                            iv
Lake and Drainage Area Map                               v
Sections
  I. Conclusions                                         1
 II. Lake and Drainage Basin Characteristics             3
III. Lake Water Quality Summary                          5
 IV. Nutrient Loadings                                  11
  V. Literature Reviewed                                16
 VI. Appendices                                         17

-------
                                  ii


                               FOREWORD
     The National Eutrophicatlon Survey was Initiated in  1972  1n
response to an Administration commitment to investigate the  nation-
wide threat of accelerated eutrophication to freshwater lakes  and
reservoirs.

OBJECTIVES

     The Survey was designed to develop, in conjunction with state
environmental agencies, information on nutrient sources,  concen-
trations, and impact on selected freshwater lakes as a basis for
formulating comprehensive and coordinated national, regional,  and
state management practices relating to point source discharge
reduction and nonpoint source pollution abatement in lake water-
sheds.

ANALYTIC APPROACH

     The mathematical and statistical procedures selected for  the
Survey's eutrophication analysis are based on related concepts
that:

     a.   A generalized representation or model relating
          sources, concentrations, and Impacts can be
          constructed.

     b.   By applying measurements of relevant parameters
          associated with lake degradation, the generalized
          model can be transformed into an operational
          representation of a lake, its drainage basin, and
          related nutrients.

     c.   With such a transformation, an assessment of the
          potential for eutrophication control can be made.

LAKE ANALYSIS

     In this report, the first stage of evaluation of lake and
watershed data collected from the study lake and its drainage
basin is documented.  The report is formatted to provide  state
environmental agencies with specific Information for basin
planning [§303(e)], water quality criteria/standards review
[§303(c)L clean lakes [§314(a,bj], and water quality monitoring
[§106 and §305(b)] activities mandated by the Federal Water
Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972.

-------
                                 111
    Beyond the single lake analysis, broader based correlations
between nutrient concentrations (and loading) and trophic condition
are being made to advance the rationale and data base for refine-
ment of nutrient water quality criteria for the Nation's freshwater
lakes.  Likewise, multivariate evaluations for the relationships
between land use, nutrient export, and trophic condition, by lake
class or use, are being developed to assist 1n the formulation
of planning guidelines and policies by the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency and to augment plans implementation by the states.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

    The staff of the National Eutrophication Survey (Office of
Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency)
expresses sincere appreciation to the Missouri Department of Natural
Resources for professional involvement, to the Missouri National
Guard for conducting the tributary sampling phase of the Survey,
and to those Missouri wastewater treatment plant operators who
provided effluent samples and flow data.

     The staff of the Missouri Department of Natural Resources,
James Wilson, Director; the Division of Environmental Quality,
Ken Karch, Director; and the Water Quality Program, James Odendahl,
Director, provided invaluable lake documentation and counsel during
the Survey, reviewed the preliminary reports and provided critiques
most useful in the preparation of this Working Paper series.

    Major General Charles M. Kiefner, the Adjutant General of Missouri,
and Project Officer Captain Donald L. Well en, who directed the
volunteer efforts of the Missouri National Guardsmen, are also
gratefully acknowledged for their assistance to the Survey.

-------
               NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY


                         STUDY LAKES


                      STATE OF MISSOURI


LAKE NAME                                      COUNTY


Clear-water Lake                              Reynolds


Pomme de Terre. Reservoir                     Polk, Hickory


Stockton Reservoir                           Dade, Polk, Cedar


Lake Taneycomo                               Taney
          /

Thomas Hill Reservoir                        Macon, Randolph


Lake Wappapello                              Wayne, Butler

-------
   THOMAS HILL

    RESERVOIR
(g) Tributary Sampling Site

X Lake Sampling Site

^ Drainage  Area Boundary
 o         s        10 Km.
         Scale
                 5 Mi.
     Map Location
            92'45'
                                                                39-45—
                                                       92'30'
                                                                39-30'—

-------
               REPORT ON THOMAS  HILL  RESERVOIR,  MISSOURI
                            STORET NO.  2905

I.    CONCLUSIONS
     A.    Trophic Condition:*
               On the basis  of field  observations  and  Survey  data,
          Thomas Hill Reservoir is considered eutrophic,  i.e.,  nutrient
          rich and potentially productive.   Whether such  nutrient en-
          richment is to be  considered  beneficial  or deleterious  is
          determined by its  actual or potential  impact upon designated
          beneficial water uses  of the  lake.
               Chlorophyll a_ levels ranged  from 0.9 yg/1  in the summer
          to 28.4 ug/1 in October, with a mean of  5.8 yg/1.  Potential
          for primary production as measured by algal  assay control
          yields was moderately low.  Of the six Missouri  lakes sampled
          in 1974, none had  higher median total  phosphorus, median inor-
          ganic nitrogen, or median dissolved orthophosphorus levels
          than Thomas Hill Reservoir.
               Survey limnologists did  not  report  any nuisance  conditions
          during their visits to the  lake.   However, it was noted that
          the lake was highly turbid  on all  sampling occasions.  The  low
          Secchi disc transparencies  (range  of 0.2 to 0.5 m)  coupled with
          high nutrient levels suggest  that  primary production  in the
          lake is light-limited.

     *See Appendix E.

-------
B.   Rate-Limi ting Nutrient:
          The algal assay results for Thomas Hill Reservoir indicate that
     phosphorus was the primary limiting nutrient at the times samples
     were collected (04/08/74, 10/06/74).  The lake data further indicate
     phosphorus as the limiting nutrient in the sampled waters.
C.   Nutrient Controllability:
     1.    Point sources -
               There were no known point sources impacting Thomas Hill
          Reservoir during the sampling year.  The present calculated
                               2
          loading of 0.48 g P/m /yr is slightly above that proposed by
          Vollenweider (1975) as eutrophic for lakes with such volume
          and retention time.  However, the actual annual loading may
          be somewhat higher since nutrient loading for the ungaged
          tributaries entering the lake were estimated from background
          loadings for tributary A-2, the Middle Fork Cariton River;
          the nutrient concentrations in that tributary are substantially
          lower than several of the other ungaged tributaries sampled.
          (see Sections IV-D,E).
     2.    Nonpoint sources -
               The Middle Fork Cariton River accounted for 44.2% of the
          total loading reaching Thomas Hill Reservoir during the sampling
          year, and ungaged drainage areas were estimated to account for
          52.1%.

-------
II.   LAKE AND DRAINAGE BASIN CHARACTERISTICS
          Lake and drainage basin characteristics  are  itemized  below.
     Lake surface area and mean  depth were  provided  by the  Missouri
     Clean Water Commission.  Maximum depth was  estimated on  the  basis
     of Survey data.   Tributary  flow data were provided by  the  Missouri
     District Office  of the U.S.  Geological  Survey (USGS).  Outlet
     drainage area includes the  lake surface area.   Mean hydraulic
     retention time was obtained  by dividing the lake  volume  by the
     mean flow of the outlet.  Precipitation values  are estimated by
     methods as outlined in National  Eutrophication  Survey  (NES)  Working
     Paper No. 175.   A table of  metric/English conversions  is included
     as Appendix A.
     A.   Lake Morphometry:
          1.   Surface area:  17.81  km2.
          2.   Mean depth:   4.1  meters.
          3.   Maximum depth:  12.2 meters.
          4.   Volume:   73.021 x  106 m3.
          5.   Mean hydraulic retention  time:  427 days (1.2  yrs).

-------
B.   Tributary and Outlet:
     (See Appendix B for flow data)

     1.    Tributaries -

                                             Drainage  Mean flow
          Name                               area(km2)  (m /sec)

          A-2 Middle Fork Cariton River        168.3     0.94

          Minor tributaries and
          immediate drainage -                 202.3     1.20

                    Totals                     370.6     2.14

     2.    Outlet - A-l Middle Fork             388.5     1.98
                       Cariton River

C.   Precipitation:

     1.    Year of sampling:  102.9 cm.
     2.    Mean annual:  98.3 cm.

-------
III.  LAKE WATER QUALITY SUMMARY
          Thomas Hill  Reservoir was sampled three times  during  the
     open-water season of 1974 by means of a-pontoon-equipped Huey
     helicopter.  Each time,  samples for physical  and  chemical  para-
     meters were collected from three stations on the  lake  and  from
     a number of depths at each station (see map,  page v).   During
     each visit, depth-integrated samples were collected from each
     station for chlorophyll  ^analysis and phytoplankton identification
     and enumeration.   During the first and last visits, 18.9-liter
     depth-integrated  samples were composited for algal  assays.   Maxi-
     mum depths sampled were  11.0 meters at Station  01,  5.8 meters at
     Station 02, and 2.4 meters at Station 03.  For  a  more  detailed
     explanation of NES methods, see NES Working Paper No.  175.
          The results  obtained are presented in full  in  Appendix  C and
     are summarized in III-A  for waters at the surface and  at the maxi-
     mum depth for each site.  Results of the phytoplankton counts and
     chlorophyll ^determinations are included in III-B. Results of
     the limiting nutrient study are presented in III-C.

-------
       HILL
STOR£T CCOE
              PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL  CHARACTERISTICS
PARAMETER
N«
( 4/ 8/74
S*«» = 3
*ANS£ «£01AN
)
MAX
DEPTH
WANGE
(METERS)
N*
( 6/20/74
S«»« = 3
HANGE MEDIAN
)
MAX
DEPTH
RANGE
(METEHS) N«
( 10/ 7/74
S»«» = 3
RANGE MEDIAN
)
MAX
DEPTH
RANGE
(METERS)
Tl*P£.HATUfA* Q£PTrt*«
P.H 
'3
9,3- 1-0.2 9.6
•9.5- lr),2 9.6

10,2- 1:0.2 10.2
9.0- 1(0.2 10.2

12.- 126. 56.
133.- 151. 137.

7,6- ,7. 7 7,6
7.6- 7.7 7,7

41.- 73. 49.
46, - 48. 47.

0,iOBD-iO,i;25 iD.085
0.025-0,121 B,-0.76

0,!0ai-.0,02'0 0,'012
0,!OB8-0,lOa2 fl,:011
'O.»30-a,l02.0 0,945
i0.9;00-a,!00,0 0..9SO
.0,:05:0-!0,1.7.0 0,110
,'0,iOflB— 0,1SO 0,090
'O.S.'OiO-sO, 8:0.0 :e, 7 0 0
0,«:0(0-.0, 7-0.0 0.500
0.0-
2.4-

1.5-
2.4-

0.0-
2.4-

0.0-
2,4-

0.0-
2.4-

0.0-
2.4-

0.0-
2.4-
0.0-
2.4-
0.0-
2.4-
0.0-
2.4-
1.5
6.1

1.5
6.1

1.5
6.1

1.5
6.1

1.5
6.1

1.5
6.1

1.5
6.1
1.5
6.1
1.5
6.1
1.5
6.1
5
3

5
3

5
3

5
3

5
3

5
3

5
3
5
3
5
3
5
3
24.3- 25.7
21.0- 25.6

6.4- 7.2
3.8- 6.8

266.- 286.
265.- 320.

7.4- 7.9
7.3- 7.6

55.- 61.
56.- 58.

0.084-3.460
0.082-0.228

0.011-2.540
0.009-0.124
0.930-1.260
0.900-0.960
0.050-0.160
0.060-0.100
O.bOO-1.900
0.600-0.600
25.2
24.7

7.0
6.0

265.
285.

7.7
7.6

55.
57.

0.087
0.112

0.028
0.011
0.990
0.930
0.080
0.080
0.900
0.600
0.0-
1.8-

0.0-
1.8-

0.0-
1.8-

0.0-
1.8-

0.0-
1.8-

0.0-
1.8-

0.0-
1.8-
0.0-
1.8-
0.0-
1.8-
0.0-
1.6-
1.5
11.0

1.5
11.0

1.5
11.0

1.5
11.0

1.5
11.0

1.5
11.0

1.5
11.0
1.5
11.0
1.5
11.0
1.5
11.0
6
3

6
3

6
3

6
3

6
3

IS
3

6
3
6
3
6
3
6
3
13.9- 17.5
13.9- 17.3

7.4- .9.6
7.4- 9.0

24U.- 260.
247.- 257.

7.5- 7.8
7.5- 7.8

64.- 67.
04.- 67.

0.031-0.069
0.030-0.061

0.004-0.017
0.004-0.007
0.210-0.600
0.210-0.570
0.020-0.050
0.020-0.030
0.500-1.100
0.400-0.800
15.8
14.9

8.8
8.4

254.
252.

7.7
7.7

66.
64.

0.042
0.036

o.oor
0.006
0.560
0.500
0.030
0.020
0.850
0.500
0.0-
1.5-

0.0-
1.5-

0.0-
1.5-

0.0-
1.5-

0.0-
1.5-

0.0-
1.5-

0.0-
1.5-
0.0-
1.5-
0.0-
1.5-
0.0-
1.5-
1.5
8.5

1.5
8.5

1.5
8.5

1.5
8.5

1.5
a. 5

1.5
8.5

1.5
8.5
1.5
8.5
1.5
8.5
1.5
8.5
       M5C  iC«ETtKS»
                               ~  .'0,3
0.3
0,2-  0.3
0.2
                                                                                                       0.3-  0.5
                                                                           0.3
                          « 'N •= WO,. OF SAMPLES
                          •»» mxJtMUM DEPTH  SAMPLED AT EACH SITE
                          ••»» "5 = MO, OF SITES SAMPLED ON THIS DATE

-------
B.   Biological Characteristics:

     1.    Phytoplankton -
          Sampling
          Date

          04/08/74
          06/20/74
          10/07/74
Dominant
Genera
1.
2.
3.
4.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Chroomonas
Cryptomonas
Schroederia
Nitzschia

Other genera

     Total

Chroomonas
Stephanodiscus
Cryptomonas
Melosira
Closterium

Other genera

     Total
Algal
Units
per ml

  140
   94
   94
   47
  375

  253
  253
  211
  169
   42
                                                         928
Stephanodiscus
Nitzschia
Melosira
Skeletonema
Chroomonas
2,045
1,217
682
682
341
                                       Other genera    1,070

                                            Total      6,037

-------
2.   Chlorophyll a^ -

     Sampling                 Station             Chlorophyll
     Date                     Number              (yg/1)
     04/08/74                   01                     2.1
                                02                     2.2
                                03

     06/20/74                   01                     0.9
                                02                     2.4
                                03                     2.3

     10/07/74                   01                     3.2
                                02                     4.8
                                03                    28.4

-------
C.   Limiting Nutrient Study:

     1.   Autoclaved, filtered, and nutrient spiked -

          a.   04/08/74
     2.
                         Ortho P
                              Inorganic N    Maximum Yield
          Spike (mg/1)   Cone,  (mg/1)   Cone,  (mg/1)    (mg/1-dry wt.)
          Control
          0.05 P
          0.05 P + 1.0 N
          1.00 N

          b.   10/06/74
                         Ortho P
0.005
0.055
0.055
0.005
0.940
0.940
1.940
1.940
0.2
8.0
8.4
0.2
                              Inorganic N    Maximum Yield
          Spike (mg/1)   Cone, (mg/1)   Cone,  (mg/1)    (mg/1-dry wt.)
          Control          0.005
          0.05 P           0.055
          0.05 P + 1.0 N   0.055
          1.00 N           0.005
                                0.475
                                0.475
                                1.475
                                1.475
 0.8
 9.6
15.9
 0.8
Discussion -

     The control yield of the assay alga, Selenastrum capri-

cornutum, indicates that the potential  for primary production

in Thomas Hill Reservoir was low at the time of spring samp-

ling and moderate during fall.  On both sampling occasions,

an increase in growth yield with the addition of phosphorus,

as well as the lack of increase with the addition of nitrogen

alone, indicates phosphorus limitation.  Maximum growth yield

was achieved with the simultaneous addition of both nutrients.

It should be noted, however, that phosphorus levels in the

control samples were generally much lower than determined for

preserved lake water samples.  This loss of phosphorus in the

-------
                        10
assay samples probably accounts for the apparent low to moderate

control yield.

     Mean N/P ratios were 90/1 and 69/1 in the spring and

autumn sampling data, indicating phosphorus limitation at those

times.  N/P ratios in the summer were 80/1 for Stations 02 and

03, but only 2/1 for Station 01 due to the inordinately high
                             o
surface phosphorus values observed during June at that station.

-------
                                  11
IV.   NUTRIENT LOADINGS
     (See Appendix D for data)
          For the determination  of nutrient  loadings,  the Missouri
     National Guard collected monthly near-surface  grab  samples0from
     each of the tributary sites indicated on  the map  (page v), ex-
     cept for the high runoff months  of October, April,  and May when
     two samples were collected.   Sampling was begun in  September
     1974, and was completed in  August 1975.
          Through an interagency agreement,  stream  flow  estimates for
     the year of sampling and a  "normalized" or average  year were pro-
     vided by the Missouri District Office of  the USGS for the tribu-
     tary sites nearest the lake.
          In this report, nutrient loads for sampled tributaries were
     determined by using a modification of a USGS computer program for
     calculating stream loadings.   Nutrient  loads indicated for tribu-
     taries are those measured minus  known point source  loads, if any.
          Nutrient loadings for  unsampled "minor tributaries and imme-
     diate drainage" ("ZZ" of USGS) were estimated  by  using the mean
     annual nutrient loads, in kg/km2/yr, for  the Middle Fork Cariton
     River at Station A-2, and multiplying the means by  the ZZ area in
     km2.

-------
                                   12
 A.  Waste Sources:

     1.   Known municipal - None known.

     2.   Known industrial - None known.
       ft

B.   Annual Total Phosphorus Loading - Average Year:

     1.   Inputs -
                                                            % of
          Source                             kg P/yr        total

          a.   Tributaries (nonpoint load) -

               A-2 Middle Fork Cariton River   3,770         44.2

          b.   Minor tributaries and immediate
               drainage (nonpoint load) -      4,450         52.1

          c.   Known municipal STP's - None

          d.   Septic tanks* -                     5          0.1

          e.   Known industrial - None

          f.   Direct precipitation** -          310          3.6

                              Totals           8,535        100.0

     2.   Output - A-l Middle Fork             3,700
                       Cariton River

     3.   Net annual P accumulation -          4,835
      *Estimate based on 20 lakeshore residences.
     **Estimate (see NES Working Paper No. 175):

-------
                                   13
C.   Annual Total Nitrogen Loading - Average Year:

     1.    Inputs -
                                                            % of
          Source                             kg N/yr        total

          a.   Tributaries (nonpoint load) -

               A-2 Middle Fork Cariton River  83,690         41.1

          b.   Minor tributaries and immediate
               drainage (nonpoint load) -    100,545         49.4

          c.   Known municipal STP's - None

          d.   Septic tanks* -                   215          0.1

          e.   Known industrial  - None

          f.   Direct precipitation** -       19.230          9.4

                              Totals         203,680        100.0

     2.    Output - A-l Middle Fork           107,770
                       Cariton River

     3.    Net annual N accumulation -         95,910
      *Estimated based on 20 lakeshore residences.
     **Estimated (see NES Working Paper No. 175).

-------
                                   14
D.   Mean annual Nonpoint Nutrient Export by Subdrainage Area:

                                                    7              7
     Tributary                               kg P/knr/yr    kg  N/km /yr

     Middle Fork Cariton River                    22            497

E.   Mean Nutrient Concentrations in Ungaged Streams:

                                             Mean Total  P   Mean Total  N
     Tributary                                  (mg/1)          (mg/1)

     A-3 Middle Fork Cariton River              0.138          2.296
     A-4 Middle Fork Cariton River              0.254          2.849
     B-l Stinking Creek                         0.193          2.775
     B-2 Stinking Creek                         0.175          2.764
     C-l North Fork Claybank Creek              0.068          2.038
     D-l Sweezer Creek                          0.160          2.400
     E-l Unnamed Creek                          0.044          1.067
     F-l Unnamed Creek                          0.093          1.161

          Nutrient concentrations for the ungaged tributaries C-l,  E-l,

     and F-l are in line with site A-2, the Middle Fork  Cariton River,

     while phosphorus levels for the remaining ungaged tributaries  are

     much higher than at Station A-2.

-------
                                 15
F.    Yearly Loadings:
          In the following table,  the existing phosphorus annual
     loading is compared to the relationship proposed by Vollenweider
     (1975).  Essentially his eutrophic  loading is  that at which
     the receiving waters would become eutrophic or remain eutrophic;
     his oligotrophic loading is that which would result in the
     receiving water remaining oligotrophic or becoming oligotrophic
     if morphometry permitted.  A mesotrophic loading would be
     considered one between eutrophic and oligotrophic.
          Note that Vollenweider's model may not apply to lakes with
     short hydraulic retention times or in which light penetration is
     severely restricted by  high concentrations of suspended solids
     in the  surface waters.
                              Total Yearly
                           Phosphorus Loading
                                (g/m2/yr)
     Estimated loading for Thomas Hill Reservoir                 0.48
     Vollenweider's eutrophic loading                            0.36
     Vollenweider's oligotrophic loading                         0.18

-------
                                   16
V.   LITERATURE REVIEWED

     U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.  1975.  National  Eutro-
       phication Survey Methods 1973-1976.  Working Paper No.  175.
       National Environmental Research Center, Las Vegas, Nevada,
       and Pacific Northwest Environmental Research Laboratory,
       Corvallis, Oregon.

     Vollenweider, R. A.  1975.  Input-Output Models With Special
       Reference to the Phosphorus Loading Concept in Limnology.
       Schweiz. Z. Hydrol.  37:53-84.

-------
                                17



VI.  APPENDICES
                          APPENDIX A



                      CONVERSION FACTORS

-------
                CONVERSION FACTORS





Hectares x 2.471 = acres



Kilometers x 0.6214 = miles



Meters x 3.281 = feet



Cubic meters x 8.107 x 10   = acre/feet



Square kilometers x 0.3861 - square miles



Cubic motors/sec x 35.315 = cubic feet/sec



Centimeters x 0.3937 = inches



Kilograms x 2.205 ~ pounds



Kilograms/square kilometer x 5.711 = Ibs/square mile

-------
    APPENDIX B



TRIBUTARY FLOW DATA

-------
                                   TRIBUTARY FLOW INFORMATION TOR MISSOURI
                                                                             02/24/77
LAKE CODE 2905     THOMAS HILL RESERVOIR

     TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA 'OF LAKE(SO KM)
          SUB-DRAINAGE
TRIBUTARY  AREA(SO KM)
2905A1
2905A2
2905ZZ
388.5
168.3
220.1
0.65
0.82
                                  FF3

                                 2.63
                                 1.25
                                 1.59
                              388.5
                             MAS
                                     APR
2.69    3.68
1.19    1.70
1.50    2.15
                        TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA OF LAKE =
                        SUM OF SUB-DRAINAGE AREAS   =

     MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS(CMS)

TRIBUTARY   MONTH   YEAR    MEAN FLOW  DAY
 2905A1
 2905A2
 29U5ZZ
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
S
b
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
74
74
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
74
' 74
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
74
74
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
1.699
0.850
0.906
0.708
0.991
4.248
2.407
4.248
2.265
2.265
1.416
0.425
0.011
0.028
0.425
0.368
0.425
1.982
1.133
1.982
1.274
0.425
0.042
0.057
0.311
0.340
0.793
0.765
0.82)
2.803
1.727
2.803
1.897
0.850
0.340
0.340
14
5

7
4
1
2
8
4
7
13
16
14
5

7
4
1
1
5
4
8
12
16












 MAY

2.80
1.36
1.73
                                                          388.5
                                                          388.5
                                                   NORMALIZED FLOWS(CMS)
                                                     JUN     JUL     AUG
FLOW
0.425
0.566
1.416
3.964
4.248
2.549
3.115
2.832
4.531
0.850
0.703
0.014
0.011
0.680
0.708
1.133
0.991
1.416
0.283
0.170
0.014
0.003
DAY

27




19
17




27




19
17



3.6d
1.73
2.21
2.10
1.05
1.33
0.63
0.42
0.54
 SEP

1.25
0.68
0.85
 OCT

1.02
0.57
0.74
 NOV

0.96
0.45
0.57
 DEC

0.71
0.34
0.42
MEAN

1.98
0.94
1.20
                                                                   SUMMARY
                                                                 TOTAL FLOW IN
                                                                 TOTAL FLOW OUT
                                                                          25.62
                                                                          23.87
                                                        FLOW  DAY


                                                       0.708
                                                                     3.256
                                                                     3.964
                                                                     0.017
                                                                     0.425
                                                                     0.184
                                                                                       FLOW

-------
        APPENDIX C



PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL DATA

-------
STOREY RETRIEVAL DATE 77/02/24
                                                                  290501
                                                                 39 31 29.0 092 36 12.0
                                                                 THOMAS HILL RESERVOIR
                                                                 29175
                                                                                          091391
/TYPA/AMyNT/LAKF!
HEPALES
04001002
002tt FEET DEPTH CLASS

DATE
FROM
TO
74/04/08



74/06/20





74/10/07




DATE
FROM
TO
74/04/08



74/06/30





74/10/07





TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
13 05 0000
13 05 0005
13 05 0015
13 05 0020
11 30 0000
1 30 0005
1 30 001S
1 30 0025
1 30 0030
1 30 0036
1 30 0000
1 30 0005
11 30 0015
11 30 0028

TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
13 05 0000
13 05 0005
13 05 0015
13 05 0020
11 30 0000
11 30 0005
11 30 0015
1 30 0025
1 30 0030
1 30 0036
1 30 0000
1 30 0004
1 30 0005
1 30 0015
1 30 0028
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
10.2
10.2
10.2
10.2
24.3
24.3
aa.3
21. d
21.2
21.0
17.5
17.5
17.5
17.3
00665
PHOS-TOT

MG/L P
0.082
0.080
0.078
0.078
3.480
0.084
0.103
0.099
0.126
0.228
0.042

0.031
0.028
0.036
00300
DO

MG/L

10.
10.
9.
7.
6.
5.
5.
4.
3.
8.
8.
8.
8.
32217
00077
TRANSP
SECCHI
INCHES
12
2
2
0
0 9
4
8
6
6
8
4 18
6
6
4
00031
00094
CNDUCTVY
FIELD
MICROMHO
13
63
130
137
285
280
269
264
268
320
257
260
259
257

00400
PH

SU
7.70
7.60
7.60
7.60
7.90
7.60
7.51
7.40
7.40
7.30
7.52
7.64
7.58
7.49

00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
73
41
45
47
61
55
55
54
56
57
66
64
65
64

00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.100
0.050
0.080
0.080
0.160
0.080
0.070
0.080
0.090
0.100
0.050
0.030
0.030
0.030

00
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.800
0.500
0.500
0.400
1.900
0.700
0.600
0.600
0.600
0.600
1.100
0.500
0.500
0.500


00630
N026.N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.940
0.950
1.000
0.980
1.260
1.000
0.970
1.030
0.970
0.930
0.600
0.580
0.580
0.570


00671
PHOS-olS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.011
0.020
0.010
0.008
2.540
0.038
0.051
0.018
0.018
0.124
0.017
0.007
0.005
0.007

CHLRPHYL INCDT LT
A .
UG/L
2.



0.





3.




REMNING
PERCENT
1



9





2
1.0



























































































































-------
STORET *ETRICVAL DATE 77/02/24
                                                                   290502
                                                                  39 35 59.0 092 38 12.0 3
                                                                  THOMAS HIL1  RESERVOIR
                                                                  29175   MISSOURI
                                                                                           091391
/TYPA/AMB'NT/LAKE
11EPALES            04001002
 0023 FEET  DEPTH  CLASS 00
DATE
F^OM
TO
74/04/08


74/06/20




74/10/07



DATE
FROM
TO
74/04/08


74/06/20




74/10/07



TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
13 30 0000
13 30 0005
13 30 0015
12 00 0000
12 00 0005
12 00 0010
12 00 0015
12 00 0019
12 00 0000
12 00 0005
12 00 0018

TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
13 30 0000
13 30 0005
13 30 0015
12 00 0000
12 00 0005
12 00 0010
12 00 0015
12 00 0019
12 00 0000
12 00 0003
12 00 0005
12 00 0018
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
9.7
9.6
9.6
25.2
25.4
24.9
24.7
24.7
15.9
15.8
14.9
00665
PHOS-TOT

MG/L P
0.089
0.081
0.025
0.087
0.085
0.076
0.086
0.082
0.042

0.033
0.030
00300 00077
DO TRANSP

MG/L

10
10
7
7
7
7
6
9
9
9
3221
SECCHI
INCHES
12
.2
.2
.0 8
.2
.0
.2
.0
.0 18
.2
.0
7 00031
00094
CNDUCTVY
FIELO
MICROMHO
12
51
133
286
286
286
285
285
252
248
247

00400
PH

SU
7.60
7.60
7.70
7.70
7.40
7.60
7.60
7.60
7.64
7.69
7.74

00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
48
48
46
55
57
54
55
58
65
64
64

00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.120
0.070
0.090
0.080
0.050
0.050
0.070
0.060
0.040
0.030
0.020

00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.800
0.500
0.500
0.900
0.600
0.600
0.500
0.600
1.100
0.500
0.400

00630
N02(.N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
1.020
0.970
1.000
0.960
0.990
1.030
1.000
0.900
0.560
0.560
0.500

00671
PHOS-OIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.013
0.012
0.012
0.028
0.013
0.011
0.010
0.009
0.010
0.006
0.006

CHLRPHYL INCOT LT
A
UG/L
2


2




4



REMNING
PERCENT
.2


.4




.8
ItO





































































































-------
.TORET  RETRIEVAL OATE 77/02/24
                                                                  290503
                                                                 39 37 29.0 092  37  20.0
                                                                 THOMAS MILL RESc«VOIf<
                                                                 29121   MISSOURI
                                                                                           091391
                                                                 11EPALES             04001002
                                                                  0011 FEET  OE^Tn  CLASS  00
DATE
FROM
TO
74/04/oa


74/06/20

74/10/07


OATE
FROM
TO
74/04/08


74/06/20

74/10/07


TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
13 50 OOUO
13 50 0005
13 50 0008
12 45 0000
12 4? 0006
13 30 COOO
12 30 0005

TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
13 50 0000
13 50 0005
13 50 0008
12 45 0000
12 45 0006
12 30 0000
12 30 0003
12 30 0005
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
9.5
9.3
9.5
25.7
25.6
14.0
13.9
00665
PHOS-TOT

MG/L P
0.125
0.093
0.121
0.124
0.112
0.069

0.061
00300 00077 00094 00400 00410 00610 00625 00630 00671
DO TRANSP CNOUCTVY PH T ALK NHS-N TUT KJEL N02kN03 PHOS-UIS
SECCHl FIELD CAC03 TOTAL N N-TOTAL ORTrtO
MG/L INCHES MICROMHO SU
9 60 7.70
1C. 2 126 7.70
10.2 151 7.70
6.8 10 266 7.80
6.8 265 7.60
9.6 13 255 7.83
7.4 352 7.75
32217 00031
CHLRPHYL INCOT LT
A REMNING
UG/L PERCENT



2.3

28.4
1.0

MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L
51 0.170 0.800 0.930
49 0.170 0.600 0.940
48 0.150 0.700 0.900
55 0.100 0.900 0.930
56 0.080 0.600 0.960
67 0.030 0.900 0.230
67 0.020 0.800 0.210












MG/L P
0.015
0.012
0.011
0.011
0.011
0.008
0.004













-------
   APPENDIX D




TRIBUTARY DATA

-------
STOftET RETRIEVAL DATE 77/03/24
/TYPA/AMdNT/STREAM
DATE
FROM    OF
 TO    DAY
         TIME DEPTH

              FEET
74/09/14
74/10/05
74/10/27
74/13/07
75/01/04
75/02/01
75/03/02
75/04/08
75/04/19
75/05/04
75/05/17
75/06/07
75/07/13
75/08/16
       10 30
       09 30
       13 30
       09 05
       14 00
       09 55
       09 35
       12 00
       08 55
       15 30
       09 00
       09 30
       09 30
       09 20
 2905A1
39.30 52.0 092 39 54.0 4
MID FORK C'MRITON
29      7.5 PRAIRIE
0/TMOMAS. HILL RE.
MO HWY 3
11EPALES
                                                                                      i ILL
                                                                                        091391
                                                                        BRDG .5 MI S« OF THOMAS HILL
                                                                                   04001004
                                                                  0000 FEET  DEPTH  CLASS 00
0630
!«>N03
OTAL
IG/L
C.480
0.464
5.336
0.400
0.352
0.397
0.432
0.490
0.500
0.550
0.580
0.630
0.450
0.260
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
1.700
0.800
1.700
1.400
1.400
1.700
0.820
1.400
1.450
0.700
i.ion
1.250
0.750
1.150
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.020
0.300
0.035
0.090
0.104
0.176
0.024
0.070
0.030
0.080
0.120
0.030
0.030
0.060
00671
PHOS-OIS
OKTHO
MG/L P
0.005
0.005K
0.005*
0.010
0.005
O.OOBK
0.008K
0.005K
0.015
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.005K
0.005
00665
PHOS-TOT

MG/L P
0.060
0.055
0.040
0.080
0.040
0.050
0.079
0.040
0.050
0.060
0.090
0.070
0.040
0.080
 K  VALUE KNOWN  TO  6£
 LESS  THAN  INDICATED

-------
STORE.! ^E
                      77/02/24
  DATE   TIMf DEPTH N02WM03
  FROM    OF
   TO*    DAY  FEET
74/09/14
74/10/05
74/12/07
75/01/04
75/0 ^/01
75/03/01
75/04/05
75/04/19
75/05/04
75/05/17
75/06/08
75/07/12
75/08/16
         15 40
         10 40
         14 45
         11 00
         10 45
         11 15
         11 35
         11 00
         10 15
         10 ??
         12 OH
         10 50
         10 40
         10 30
                                                                   290SA2
                                                                  39 44  23.0  09?  36  30.0  4
                                                                  MID  FORK  C-"V»ITON  Rlv£«
                                                                  ?9       7.b 8EVIER SOUTH
                                                                  T/THCHAS  HILL RESEKVoI*  0913*1
                                                                  SEC  RO 6*00 2.5 MI ESE  OF  BEVIER
                                                                  11E»ALES             G4001004
                                                                   0000  FEET   DEPTH   CLASS  00
0630 00625
«nN03 TOT KJEL
OTAL N
6/L MG/L
0.040 1.309
0.016 0.600
0.024 1.300
1.520 3.600
0.774 2.000
a. 610 a. POO
1.100
1.160
0.012 <
0.200 (
0.045
1.500
0.060
0.010
.630
.450
>.700
.800
.C30
.900
.250
.050
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
3.100
0.095
0.110
0.155
C.376
0.096
a. 128
0.125
0.037
0.025
0.175
0.060
0.070
0.030
00671
PHOS-OIS
OPTHO
MG/L P
0.005K
0.005K
0.010
0.035
0.010
0.016

0.020
0.015
0.010
0.005
0.020
0.005
0.010
00665
PHOS-TOT

MG/L P
0.030
0.040
0.080

0.070
0.100
0.205
0.18C
0.100
0.070
0.035
0.130
0.030
0.070
   H VALUE KNOWN TO dE
   LESS THAN INDICATED

-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE-77/0?/2-»
/TYPA/AM8NT/STREAM
 2905A3
39 46 00.0 092 34 20.0 4
MID FORK CHARITON rfivEtf
29      MACON co H«Y HAP
T/THOMAS HILL KESEMVGIK  091391
CO HWY 00 tiRDG 3 MI N OF BEVIER
11EPALES            C400I004
 0000 FEET  DEPTH  CLASS 00
DATE
FROM
TO
74/09/14
74/10/12
74/11/02
74/12/07
75/01/04
75/02/01
75/03/01
75/04/05
75/04/19
75/05/04
75/05/17
75/06/07
75/06/22
75/07/12
75/08/23
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY
12
12
11
12
10
10
11
11
14
11
10
10
12
08
10

FEET
00
35
10
05
45
30
00
30
45
30
50
40
50
30
45
00630 00625
N02&N03 TOT KJEL
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.330
0.032
0.016
1.760
0.920
0.528
1.250
1.150
0.005
0.400
0.155
1.950
0.040
0.195
G.010
N
MG/L
1.200
1.700
1.700
3.700
1.300
0.700
1.950
1.750
0.600
2.900
0.800
2.200
1.400
1.150
1.650
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.025
0.050
0.037
0.075
0.104
0.056
0.084
0.085
0.005
0.050
0.035
0.200
0.030
0.080
0.035
00671 00665
PHOS-OIS PHOS-TOT
OPTHO
MG/L P
0.020
0.025
0.035
0.045
0.010
0.016
0.025
0.025
0.015
0.015
0.010
0.025
0.010
0.010
0.020

MG/L P
0.120
0.130
0.170
0.350
0.060
0.050
0.200
0.180
0.090
0.120
0.060
0.180
0.120
0.090
0.150

-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 77/02/24
/TYPA/AMSNT/STPEAM
  DATE   TIME DEPTH N026.N03
  F&OM    or
   TO    GAY  FEET
74/09/14
74/10/12
74/11/02
74/12/07
75/01/04
75/02/01
75/03/01
75/04/05
75/04/19
75/05/04
75/05/17
75/06/07
75/08/23
12 30
12 50
   50
   20
   10
   00
   25
   00
11
12
11
11
11
12
15  05
11  50
11  ?0
11  10
10  30
                                                         2905A4
                                                        39 52 30.0 092 33 40.0 4
                                                        MID FORK r-.ARITON RIVER
                                                        29      MACON CO HwY MAP
                                                        T/THOMAS "ILL RESERVOIR  091391
                                                        SEC HO 6ROG 5 MI WSW OF ATLANTA
                                                        11EPALES            04001004
                                                         0000 FEET  DEPTh  CLASS 00
0630
6.N03
OTAL
G/L
0.128
0.040
0.490
2.000
0.815
0.464
1.600
1.570
0.280
0.345
0.270
1.700
0.030
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
1.600
6.000
2.350
3.200
1.400
1.000
1.400
2.400
2.000
1.050
1.350
1.550
2.000
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.063
0.050
0.070
0.085
•3.256
0.040
0.096
0.075
0.055
0.050
0.060
0.0.45
0.045
00671
PHOS-OIS
OPTHO
MG/L P
0.005
0.045
0.020
0.060
0.015
0.016
0.020
0.020
0.035
0.010
0.010
0.015
0.030
00665
PHOS-TOT

MG/L P
0.060
1.250
0.360
0.250
0.090
0.090
0.1 40
0.230
0.330
0.100
0.070
0.210
0.120

-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 77/02/2'*
/ TYP A/ A«8NT/ ST«E.AM
  DATE   TIME DEPTH N02S.N03
  FROM    OF
   TO    DAY  FEET
                                                          290561
                                                         39  40  06.6  092  39  06.0  4
                                                         STINKING  CfTEK
                                                         29      7.5 LAGONDA
                                                         T/THOMAS  rtlLL RESERVOIR  091391
                                                         SEC RO BRUG 6 MI S OF CALLAO
                                                         11EPALES             04001004
                                                          0000  FEET   DEPTH  CLASS 00
74/09/14
74/10/05
74/10/27
74/12/07
75/01/04
75/02/01
75/03/02
75/04/08
75/04/19
75/05/04
75/05/17
75/06/07
75/07/12
75/08/16
11 05
09 50
14 00
13 25
14 30
10 20
10 00
14 30
09 15
15 00
10 00
10 00
10 30
10 15
0630
!6,N03
OTAL
IG/L
0.152
0.056
0.032
1.320
1.500
0.760
1.570
1.350
0.005
0.150
0.210
1.200
0.020
C.020
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
2.400
2.000
2.100
3.100
1.900
1.200
1.150
2.900
2.400
1.550
2.100
4.400
1.300
2.000
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.070
0.360
0.035
0.310
0.368
0.152
0.156
0.570
G.140
0.050
0.090
0.080
0.080
0.230
00671
PHOS-IIIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.010
0.010
0.015
0.140
0.030
0.0^0
0.016
0.040
0.015
0.020
0.025
0.030
0.040
0.025
00665
PHOS-TOT

MG/L P
0.095
0.155
0.160
0.460
U.I 80
0.150
0.030
0.235
0.100
0.160
0.380

0.200
0.210

-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE "'7/02/24
/TYPA/AM8NT/STPEAM
                      00630
  DATE   TIME DEPTH N02MM03
  FROM    OF        N-TOTAL
   TO    DAY  FEET    MG/L
74/10/05
74/10/27
74/12/07
75/01/05
75/02/01
75/03/01
75/04/05
75/04/19
75/05/04
75/05/17
75/06/08
75/07/12
75/08/16
15 20
10 ?0
14 20
10 ?5
10 ?0
10 15
10 40
10 40
09 50
10 00
10 15
10 35
10 20
10 15
o.ioe
0.032
0.032
2.320
1.540
1.010
1.900
1.250
0.005
0.025
0.030
0.750
0.120
0.020
  00625
TOT KJEU
   N
  MG/L

   1.400
   2.000
   ?.200
   2.700
   1.400
   1.300
   1.950
   1.950
   0.950
   1.100
   2.300
   3.150
   2.750
   4.400
                                    290582
                                   39 46 50.0 092 38 00.0 4
                                   STINMNG C"EEK
                                   29      MACON CO rtwY MAP
                                   T/THOMAS MILL RESERVOIR
                                   SEC RD 8RDG 1
                                   11EPALES
                                                                   091391
                                                        5 MI NW OF CALLAO
                                                              04001004
                                                                  0000 FEET  DEPTH  CLASS 00
 00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
 MG/L

  0.060
  0.280
  0.315
  0.165
  0.368
  P. 280
  0.224
  0.530
  0.030
  0.610
  0.140
  0.145
  0.390
  0.300
  00671
PrIOS-DIS
 ORTMO
 MG/L P

   0.020
   0.015
   0.030
   0.125
   0.012
   0.016
   G.008
   0.025
   0.015
   0.010
   0.010
   0.030
   0.020
   0.045
  00665
PHOS-TOT

 MG/L P

   0.185
   0.185
   0.250
   0.280
   0.070
   0.090
   0.140
   0.140
   0.09S
   0.130
   0.130
   0.260
   0.320

-------
STOSET RETRIEVAL DATE 77/02/24
/TVP.A/AMBNT/ST9F.AM
 2405C1
39 40 00.0 092 35 27.0 4
N FORK CLAY8ANK CREEK
29      7.5 BEVIER SOUTH
T/THOMAS MILL RESERVOIR  091391
SEC RD bRDG 5.5 MI S OF riEVIER
11EPALES            0*001004
 0000 FEET  DEPTH  CLASS 00
DATE
FROM
TO
74/09/14
74/10/05
74/10/27
74/12/07
75/01/04
75/02/01
75/04/08
75/04/19
75/05V04
75/05/17

75/06/07
75/07/12
75/08/16
00630 00625
TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TOTAL N
DAY FEET
11 30
10 15
14 15
10 05
15 00
11 00
15 15
10 00
14 00
10 30
11 00
10 45
11 00
10 45
MG/L
0.060
0.024
0.056
0.690
1.500
0.768
0.270
0.095
0.115
0.390
0.050
0.130
0.030
0.070
MG/L
2.303
2.000
1.600
2.600
2.400
1.900
1.450
0.900
1.150
0.600
1.300
1.800
1.880
2.400
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PHOS-DIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL ORTrtO
MG/L
1.900
1.600
0.890
0.390
0.320
0.144
0.200
0.330
0.230
0.050
0.925
0.610
1 .880
1.900
MG/L P
0.010
0.015
0.005
0.020
0.055
0.040
0.005
0.005
0.005K
0.005K
0.005K
0.005K
0.015
0.025
MG/L P
0.015
0.020
0.010K
0.160
0.300
0.150
0.010
0.020
0.030
0.010
0.010K
0.010
0.030
0.060
   K  VALUE.' KNO»(N TO 8E
   LESS  THAN INDICATED

-------
STOSET RETRIEVAL DATE 77/02/24
/TfPA/A"1BNT/STREAM
  DATE   TIME DEPTH N02S.N03
  FROM    OF
   TO    DAY  FEET
74/09/14
74/10/12
74/11/02
74/12/07
75/01/04
75/02/01
75/03/01
75/04/05
75/04/19
75/05/03
75/05/17

75/06/07
75/06/22
75/07/12
11 45
12 25
11 05
11 50
10 00
10 10
10 50
11 00
14 30
10 45
10 30
11 50
10 10
12 35
08 20
 2S-0501
39 47 45.0 092 36 40.0 4
SWEEZE-} CRPF.K
29      MACGN co HWY MAP
T/THOMAS HILL RESERVOIR  091391
SEC KD B*DG 2 MI NNE OF CALLAO
IIE^ALES            04001004
 0000 FEET  DEPTH  CLASS 00
0630
S.N03
OTAL
G/L
0.240
0.040
0.024
1.920
0.965
0.528
1.150
1.150
0.005
0.200
0.210
3.035
0.920
0.010
0.200
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
4.800
2.700
1.400
3.300
1.500
1.500
1.900
3.000
1.800
1.500
1.650
0.100
1.550
1.250
1.450
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.065
0.315
0.040
0.100
0.086
0.064
0.112
0.070
0.060
0.075
0.070
0.030
0.110
0.035
0.075
00671
PHOS-OIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.030
0.050
0.045
0.060
0.016
0.016
0.008
0.020
0.015
0.010
0.010
0.005K
0.025
0.015
0.010
00665
PHOS-TOT

MG/L P
0.130
0.460
0.160
0.270
o.oao
0.050
o ; 1 50
0.195
0.130
0.100
0.090
O.U10K
0.210
0.110
0.100
   K  VALUE  KNOWN  TO  BE
   LESS  THAN  INDICATED

-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 77/D2/24
/TYPA/AMdNT/STREAM
              FEET
 2905E1
39 49 40.0 092 40 45.0 4
UNNAMED CSIEK
?9      MACON CO HwY MAP
T/THOMAS HILL RESE^VUIK  091391
CO HWY UU 5 MI Nrt OF CALLAO
11EPALES            04001004
 0000 FEET  DEPTH  CLASS 00
DATE
FROM
TO
74/09/14
74/10/05
74/10/27
74/12/07
75/01/05
75/02/01
75/03/01
75/04/05
75/04/19
75/05/03
75/05/17
75/06/08
75/07/12
75/08/16
TIME
OF
DAY 1
15 00
10 00
14 00
10 05
10 05
10 ?5
10 ?Q
10 ?.S
09 35
09 50
10 00
10 15
10 05
10 00
00630
N02^sN03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.036
0.016
0.016
0.312
0.204
0.168
0.230
0.185
0.210
0.280
0.035
0.310
0.020
0.015
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
1.300
0.900
0.500
1.200
0.600
0.900
1.550
1.100
1.050
0.450
0.650
0.450
0.650
1.400
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.315
0.350
0.185
0.145
0.092
0.136
0.232
0.075
0.015
0.020
0.090
0.030
0.240
0.160
00671
PHOS-OIS
OPTHO
MG/L P
0.005K
0.005K
0.015
0.040
0.010
0.032
0.008K
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.005
0.015
0.005
0.005
00665
PHOS-TOT

MG/L i»
0.035
0.045
0.030
0.150
0.010
0.050
0.060
0.050
0.020
0.020
0.010
0.020
0.070
0.050
  K VALUE KNOWN TO 6E
  LESS THAN INDICATED

-------
       RETRIEVAL DATE 77/o^/24
/TYPA/AKBNT/STREAM
  DATE   TIME DEPTH N02S.N03
  FROM    OF
   TO    DAY  FEET
74/1 1/02
74/12/07
75/02/01
75/03/01
75/04/05
75/04/19
75/05/03
75/05/17
75/06/07
75/07/12
10
11
09
10
10
14
10
09
09
08
50
25
30
10
30
10
00
50
30
00
 29051F
39 54 10.0 092 39 20.0 4
UNNAMED CRP^K
?9      MACON CO H*Y MAP
T/THOMAS MILL RESEKVOIR  091391
co HWY HH 4 MI s OF ELMER
11EDALES            04001004
 0000 FEET  DEPTH  CLASS 00
0630
S.N03
OTAL
G/L
0.056
0.368
C.128
0.260
0.195
0.045
0.045
0.015
0.040
0.260
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
1.100
1.500
0.650
0.500
0.650
1.900
0.150
1.750
0.550
1.450
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.150
0.090
0.048
C.088
0.040
0.025
0.015
0.027
0.021
0.115
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.015
0.045
0.016
0.016
0.020
0.025
0.015
0.027
0.020
0.015
00665
PHOS-TOT

MG/L P
0.060
0.190
0.025
0.100
0.090
0.050
0.030
0.210
0.080
0.090

-------
         APPENDIX E

PARAMETRIC RANKINGS OF LAKES
   SAMPLED BY NES IN 1974

     STATE OF MISSOURI

-------
   K' fiftTft TO  BE  USPO IN
CODf




2901  CL£Af*ATE~-  tAr-F




?9o?  POM'-'E OE  TE^^R:




      STOCKTON




      LAKF. TANEVCOM0




290^  THOMAS HILL
TOT/SL a
r-.nif
O.n»3
0.02?
0.«<3
o.nfez
0.033
MEDIAN
INO->G fv
0.1 bO
0.275
0.670
0.530
1.040
0.105
SOO-
Mfar, SEC
44S.OOO
449.928
42B.aoo
420.250
487.889
459.667
"-lEAM
CHLORA
3.567
9.*43
8.973
9.B25
5.787
9.642
15-
MIN oo
10.400
14.HOO
15.000
11.200
11.200
11.000
MEDIAN
DISb 0»THO o
0.004
o.ooe
0.006
0.007
0.011
0.004

-------
fJtPCE'-.'T OF L^*?*1 «ItH HlOhF- VALl
LAKE
CO'JK Li'-E NAvf.
?<«i;l CLKi^»ATf} L---E
?QO;> priMvE Ofc TF.w-f'' •^E'-ERVOjM
2903 STOCKTON ^EScKVOIv-
2904 LAKE IANEVCOM0
290S THOMAS MILL i-ESfc^vOIn
290^1 WflD'JAPELLO RESFHVOI9
JF9 (NU^^F^ OF" L'
» E n I A N
TOTAL ~
1 o ''; ( S )
2" ( 1)
H 0 ( 4 )
60 ( 3)
01 0)
40 ( ?)
IKES w i T ii HI'
«EO]
Ii-iO'-
HO
eo
20
<*0
0
100
[ AM
'b N
( 
"0 ( 2)
60 ( 3)
01 0)
tiO ( *)
20 < 11

1S-
MlN 00
100 ( 5)
20 ( 1 )
0 ( 0)
50 ( ?)
50 ( 2)
dO ( 4)

MEDIAN
oiss O«T>-O P
<»0 I 4)
20 ( 1 )
eo ( i)
40 ( ?)
o ( n>
90 ( 4)
NO

-------