U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
WORKING PAPER SERIES
REPORT
ON
LAKE HAPPAPELLO
NAYNE AND BUTLER COUNTIES
MISSOURI
EPA REGION VII
WORKING PAPER No, 551
CORVALLIS ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY - CORVALLIS, OREGON
and
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING & SUPPORT LABORATORY - LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
699-440
-------
REPORT
ON
LAKE HAPPAPELLO
WAYNE AND BUTLER COUNTIES
MISSOURI
EPA REGION VII
WORKING PAPER No, 551
WITH THE COOPERATION OF THE
MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
AND THE
MISSOURI ['NATIONAL GUARD
FEBRUARY, 1977
-------
REPORT ON LAKE WAPPAPELLO
WAYNE AND BUTLER COUNTIES, MISSOURI
EPA REGION VII
by
National Eutrophication Survey
Water and Land Monitoring Branch
Monitoring Applications Laboratory
Environmental Monitoring & Support Laboratory
Las Vegas, Nevada
and
Eutrophication Survey Branch
Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory
Con/all is, Oregon
Working Paper No. 551
OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
February 1977
-------
CONTENTS
Page
Foreword ii
List of Missouri Study Lakes iv
Lake and Drainage Area Map v
Sections
I. Conclusions 1
II. Lake and Drainage Basin Characteristics 5
III. Lake Water Quality Summary 7
IV. Nutrient Loadings 12
V. Literature Reviewed 18
VI. Appendices 19
-------
FOREWORD
The National EutropMcatlon Survey was Initiated in 1972 in
response to an Administration commitment to investigate the nation-
wide threat of accelerated eutrophlcatlon to freshwater lakes and
reservoirs.
OBJECTIVES
The Survey was designed to develop, in conjunction with state
environmental agencies, information on nutrient sources, concen-
trations, and impact on selected freshwater lakes as a basis for
formulating comprehensive and coordinated national, regional, and
state management practices relating to point source discharge
reduction and nonpoint source pollution abatement in lake water-
sheds.
ANALYTIC APPROACH
The mathematical and statistical procedures selected for the
Survey's eutrophication analysis are based on related concepts
that:
a. A generalized representation or model relating
sources, concentrations, and impacts can be
constructed.
b. By applying measurements of relevant parameters
associated with lake degradation, the generalized
model can be transformed into an operational
representation of a lake, its drainage basin, and
related nutrients.
c. With such a transformation, an assessment of the
potential for eutrophlcatlon control can be made.
LAKE ANALYSIS
In this report, the first stage of evaluation of lake and
watershed data collected from the study lake and its drainage
basin is documented. The report is formatted to provide state
environmental agencies with specific information for basin
flanninq [§303(e)L water quality criteria/standards review
§303(c)], clean lakes [§314(a,b)], and water quality monitoring
[§106 and §305(b)] activities mandated by the Federal Water
Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972.
-------
111
Beyond the single lake analysis, broader based correlations
between nutrient concentrations (and loading) and trophic condition
are being made to advance the rationale and data base for refine-
ment of nutrient water quality criteria for the Nation's freshwater
lakes. Likewise, multivariate evaluations for the relationships
between land use, nutrient export, and trophic condition, by lake
class or use, are being developed to assist in the formulation
of planning guidelines and policies by the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency and to augment plans Implementation by the states.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The staff of the National Eutrophication Survey (Office of
Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency)
expresses sincere appreciation to the Missouri Department of Natural
Resources for professional involvement, to the Missouri National
Guard for conducting the tributary sampling phase of the Survey,
and to those Missouri wastewater treatment plant operators who
provided effluent samples and flow data.
The staff of the Missouri Department of Natural Resources,
James Wilson, Director; the Division of Environmental Quality,
Ken Karch, Director; and the Water Quality Program, James Odendahl,
Director, provided invaluable lake documentation and counsel during
the Survey, reviewed the preliminary reports and provided critiques
most useful in the preparation of this Working Paper series.
Major General Charles M. Kiefner, the Adjutant General of Missouri,
and Project Officer Captain Donald L. Well en, who directed the
volunteer efforts of the Missouri National Guardsmen, are also
gratefully acknowledged for their assistance to the Survey.
-------
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
STUDY LAKES
STATE OF MISSOURI
LAKE NAME
Clearwater Lake
Pomme de Terre Reservoir
Stockton Reservoir
Lake Taneycomo
Thomas Hill Reservoir
Lake Wappapello
COUNTY
Reynolds
Polk, Hickory
Dade, Polk, Cedar
Taney
Macon, Randolph
Wayne, Butler
-------
LAKE WAPFAPELLO
• Scw.ige ^reatmtnl F
-------
REPORT ON LAKE WAPPAPELLO, MISSOURI
STORE! NO. 2906
I. CONCLUSIONS
A. Trophic Condition:*
On the basis of field observations and Survey data,
Lake Wappapello is considered eutrophic, i.e., nutrient
rich and highly productive. Whether such nutrient enrich-
ment is to be considered beneficial or deleterious is deter-
mined by its actual or potential impact upon designated
beneficial water uses of each lake.
Chlorophyll a_ values ranged from 3.0 yg/1 in the summer
to 14.4 yg/1 in the fall, with a mean of 9.6 yg/1. Secchi
disc transparency and potential for primary production as
measured by algal assay control yields were low. Of the six
Missouri lakes sampled in 1974, two had higher median total
phosphorus levels, five had higher median inorganic nitrogen
values, and four had higher orthophosphorus levels than Lake
Wappapello.
Survey limnologists reported floating aquatics (Nymphea)
at Station 04 in June, and a heavy algae bloom throughout
the open lake with floating algae clumps swept in from side
coves at Station 02 in October.
*See Appendix E.
-------
B. Rate-Limiting Nutrient:
The algal assay results indicate phosphorus limitation at
the times the assay samples were collected (04/09/74, 10/08/74).
Mean inorganic nitrogen to orthophosphorus (N/P) ratios in the
lake data were 18/1 or greater on all sampling occasions, further
indicating primary limitation by phosphorus.
C. Nutrient Controllability:
1. Point sources -
Point sources were estimated to have contributed 1.2%
of the total phosphorus load. The city of Annapolis contri-
buted the entire load.
2
The calculated phosphorus loading of 1.93 g P/m /yr for
Lake Wappapello is only slightly greater than the eutrophic
load proposed by Vollenweider (1975). However, Vollenweider's
model may not be applicable for lakes with short hydraulic
retention times (14 days for Lake Wappapello), or in which
loading calculations yield an apparent net export of phosphorus
from the lake. In Lake Wappapello, there are several factors
which may account for the apparent export of phosphorus. In
addition to the city of Annapolis, there are 25 small private
sewage facilities impacting the Wappapello drainage basin
(Missouri Department of Natural Resources, manuscript), and
several industrial and municipal facilities upstream which are
-------
not included in the nutrient loadings because of their dis-
tance from the reservoir. Although the majority of tribu-
taries sampled do not reflect an impact from the smaller
private plants in the area, the high background loading to
the St. Francis River (Section IV-D) is certainly due, at
least in part, to impact from the upstream private, municipal
and industrial plants. Among the larger upstream plants are
the American Smelter and Refining Company, the Arcadia Heat
Processing Company, the Pilot Knob Pellet Company, and munici-
pal sewage treatment facilities for the cities of Ironton,
Arcadia, Graniteville, and Middlebrook. There is also a fish
hatchery discharging to Hubble Creek, a tributary of the St.
Francis River, downstream of the inlet sampling Station A-2.
Nutrient contributions from this source are not known. Addi-
tional sampling to determine the true nutrient budget for Lake
Wappapello is needed before recommendations of nutrient con-
trollability in the lake can be proposed.
2. Nonpoint sources -
The mean annual phosphorus load from nonpoint sources,
including precipitation, accounted for 98.8% of the total
reaching Lake Wappapello. The St. Francis River contributed
88.8%, and ungaged tributaries were estimated to have contri-
buted 8.0%.
-------
The phosphorus export of tributary C-l, Clark Creek,
(Section IV-D) is comparable to the tributary exports of
2
nearby Clearwater Lake (range of 1 to 4 kg P/km /yr, mean of
3 kg P/km2/yr).
-------
II. LAKE AND DRAINAGE BASIN CHARACTERISTICS
Lake and drainage basin characteristics are itemized below.
Lake morphometry was provided by the Missouri Clean Hater Com-
mission. Tributary flow data were provided by the Missouri
District Office of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). Outlet
drainage area includes the lake surface area. Mean hydraulic
retention time was obtained by dividing the lake volume by mean
flow of the outlet. Precipitation values are estimated by methods
outlined in National Eutrophication Survey (NES) Working Paper
No. 175. A table of metric/Englich conversions is included as
Appendix A.
A. Lake Morphometry:
2
1. Surface area: 16.59 km .
2. Mean depth: 3.0 meters.
3. Maximum depth: 4.6 meters.
4. Volume: 49.770 x 106 m3.
5. Mean hydraulic retention time: 14 days.
-------
Tributary and Outlet:
(See Appendix B for flow data)
1. Tributaries -
Drainage Mean flow
Name area(knr) (nr/sec)
A-2 St. Francis River 2,432.0 27.58
C-l Clark Creek 97.1 0.58
Minor tributaries and
immediate drainage - 848.5 10.45
Totals 3,377.6 38.61
2. Outlet - A-l St. Francis River 3,395.5 42.26
Precipitation:
1. Year of sampling: 112.4 cm.
2. Mean annual: 111.1 cm.
-------
III. LAKE WATER QUALITY SUMMARY
Lake Wappapello was sampled three times during the open-
water season of 1974 by means of a pontoon-equipped Huey heli-
copter. Each time, samples for physical and chemical parameters
were collected from four stations on the lake and from a number
of depths at each station (see map, page v). During each visit,
depth-integrated samples were collected from each station for
chlorophyll a^ analysis and phytoplankton identification and enu-
meration. During the first and last visits, 18.9-liter depth-
integrated samples were composited for algal assays. Maximum
depths sampled were 7.0 meters at Station 01, 11.0 meters at
Station 02, 5.5 meters at Station 03, and 9.4 meters at Station 04.
For a more detailed explanation of NES methods, see NES Working
Paper No. 175.
The results obtained are presented in full in Appendix C
and are summarized in III-A for waters at the surface and at the
maximum depth for each site. Results of the phytoplankton counts
and chlorophyll a_ determinations are included in III-B. Results
of the limiting nutrient study are presented in III-C.
-------
STuKET COOK
AND CnEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS
( 6/16/74 )
( 10/ b/7-4 )
0.-1.5 M fiE'-TH
MAX OEPT-i**
DISSol VEU OxYi^E.'j
0.-1.5 i" DEr-TH
MAX DEPTH**
CONDUCTIVITY (U'^H
O.-l.S M DEPTH
MAX DEPTH**
PH (STANOAPD UNIT
C.-1.5 M DEPTn
MAX UEPTh**
TOTAL ALKALINITY
O.-l.S M DEPTH
MAX DEPTH**
TOTAL P (MG/L)
O.-l.S M DEPTH
MAX OF.PTH**
DISSOLVED OPTHO P
0.-1.5 M DEPTH
MAX DEPTH**
NO?+NOJ (MG/Li
0.-1.5 V DEPTH
MAX DEPTH**
AMMONIA IMG/LI
O.-l.S i* OEKTH
MAX DEPTH**
KJELOAHL N (Mb/L)
0.-1.5 "' DEPTH
MAX DEPTH**
N*
CENT)
rt
(MG/U
•4
4
a
4
-•>!
a
4
(MG/L)
b
4
«
4
(MG/L)
8
4
8
4
8
4
a
4
10.7-
9.6-
9.8-
63.-
63.-
7.4-
7.3-
2«.-
28.-
0.020-0
0.026-0
0.003-0
0.003-0
O.OSO-0
0.040-0
0.020-0
0.020-0
0.200-0
0.200-0
12.8
12.0
10.6
10.2
139.
138.
8.1
7.9
80.
78.
.052
.04J
.011
.004
.170
.140
.ObO
.040
.500
.300
; 4
12.0
11.4
10.1
9.M
12fl.
126.
7.b
7.6
67.
67.
0.033
0.031
0.00-*
0.003
o.ino
0.175
0.040
0.035
0.300
0.200
MAX
OtPTM
("ETE
0.0-
4.6-
1.5-
4.6-
0.0-
4.6-
0.0-
4.6-
0.0-
4.6-
0.0-
4.b-
0.0-
4.b-
0.0-
4.6-
0.0-
4.6-
0.0-
4.6-
1.5
8.5
1.5
3.5
1.3
8.5
1.5
8.5
1.5
8.5
1 .'i
8.5
1.5
8.5
1.5
8.5
1.5
8.5
1.5
8.5
8
4
3
4
8
4
H
4
7
4
B
4
7.
4
7
4
7
4
tt
4
KANGt
21.9- 25.4
19.8- 23.7
8.4-
4.0-
121.-
105.-
7.7-
7.2-
52.-
35.-
0.027-0
0.024-0
0.002-0
0.004-0
0.020-0
0.040-0
0.020-0
0.030-0
0.300-0
0.300-0
3.8
6.2
160.
153.
8.4
7.8
60.
68.
.048
.ObO
.005
.Olb
.060
.160
.040
.QUO
.400
.400
- 4
•'ED I AN
24.8
21.2
8.6
5.4
143.
127.
8.2
7.3
64.
56.
0.033
0.049
0.003
0.007
0.040
0.090
0.030
0.060
0.350
0.300
MAX
DEPTH
KANGE
(METERS)
0.0- 1.5
4. 9-. 11.0
0.0-
4.9-
0.0-
4.9-
0.0-
4.9-
0.0-
4.9-
0.0-
4.9-
0.0-
4.9-
u.o-
4.9-
0.0-
4.9-
0.0-
4.9-
1.5
11.0
1.5
11.0
1.5
11.0
1 .5
11.0
1.5
11.0
1.5
11.0
1.5
11.0
1.5
11.0
1.5
11.0
4
8
4
H
A
8
4
8
4
8
4
H
4
1
4
fi
4
8
4
S»»*
KANGE
lo.S- 17.4
16.3- 17.2
8.6-
6.0-
U9.-
U9.-
7.8-
7.2-
85.-
85.-
0.027-0
0.030-0
0.003-0
0.004-0
0.020-0
0.020-0
0.060-0
0.050-0
0.200-0
0.200-0
9.8
9.2
205.
203.
8.0
7.9
121 .
118.
.044
.05?
.006
.004
.ObO
.090
.130
.110
.700
.300
= 4
MEDIAN
17.1
16.8
9.3
8.7
169.
171.
7.8
7.8
97.
94.
0.035
0.038
0.004
0.004
0.025
0.040
0.060
0.085
0.350
0.250
MAX
DEPTH
RANGt
(METEWS)
0.0- 1.5
4.9- 8.6
0.0-
4.9-
0.0-
4.9-
0.0-
4.9-
0.0-
4.9-
0.0-
4.9-
0.0-
4.9-
0.0-
4.9-
0.0-
4.9-
0.0-
4.9-
1.5
d.rt
1.3
8.8
1.5
8.8
1.5
8.8
1.3
8.8
1.5
8.8
1.5
8.8
1.3
8.8
1.3
8.8
SECChl DISC
o.b- o. r
0.6
1.1- 1.8
1.7
0.7- 1.1
1.0
o N = NO. OF i
»« MAXIMUM UEPTH SAMPLED AT.EACn SITE
S = NO. OF SITtS SAMPLED ON THIS DATE
-------
B. Biological Characteristics:
1. Phytoplankton -
Sampling
Date
04/09/74
06/18/74
10/08/74
Dominant
Genera
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Melosira
Chroomonas
Nitzschia
Cryptomonas
Dactyl ococcopsis
Other genera
Total
Melosira
Chroomonas
Skeletonema
Microcystis
Dinobryon
Other genera
Total
Melosira
Crucigenia
Trarhplnmnnas
Ankistrodesmus
Cryptomonas
Other genera
Algal
Units
per ml
1,539
483
483
483
220
835
4,043
1,684
741
562
472
336
2,135
5,930
3,759
239
239
179
119
177
Total
4,712
-------
10
2. Chlorophyll a^ -
Sampling Station Chlorophyll
Date Number (yg/1 )
04/09/74 01 12.4
02 6.8
03 9.8
04 3.6
06/18/74 01 10.0
02 12.8
03 3.0
04 8.9
10/08/74 01 14.4
02 11.0
03 9.9
04 13.1
-------
11
C. Limiting Nutrient Study:
1. Autoclaved, filtered, and nutrient spiked -
a. 04/09/74
Ortho P Inorganic N Maximum Yield
Spike(mg/1) Cone.(mg/1) Cone!(mg/1) (mg/l-dry wt.)
Control <0.005 0.100 0.1
0.05 P <0.055 0.100 1.4
0.05 P + 1.0 N <0.055 1.100 18.5
1.00 N o <0.005 1.100 0.1
b. 10/08/74
Control 0.005 0.294 0.4
0.05 P 0.055 0.294 7.2
0.05 P + 1.0 N 0.055 1.294 9.9
1.00 N 0.005 1.294 0.3
2. Discussion -
The control yield of the assay alga, Selenastrum capri-
cornutum, indicates that potential for primary production
was low in Lake Wappapello at the times of sampling. On both
sampling dates, increases in yield with the addition of phos-
phorus as well as the lack of response to the addition of
nitrogen indicate phosphorus limitation. Maximum growth
potential was achieved with the simultaneous addition of the
two nutrients.
Mean N/P ratios in the lake data were 18/1 or greater
on all sampling occasions, further indicating primary limi-
tation by phosphorus (a mean N/P of 14/1 or greater generally
reflects phosphorus limitation).
-------
12
IV. NUTRIENT LOADINS
(See Appendix D for data)
For the determination of nutrient loadings, the Missouri
National Guard collected monthly near-surface grab samples from
each of the tributary sites indicated on the map (pagev ), ex-
cept for the high runoff months of April and May when two sam-
ples were collected. Sampling Was begun in September 1974, and
was completed in August 1975.
Through an interagency agreement, stream flow estimates for
the year of sampling and a "normalized" or average year were pro-
vided by the Missouri District Office of the USGS for the tribu-
tary sites nearest the lake.
In this report, nutrient loads for sampled tributaries were
determined by using, a modification .of a USGS computer program for
calculating stream loadings. Nutrient loads indicated for tribu-
taries are those measured minus known point source loads, if any.
Nutrient loadings for unsampled "minor tributaries and imme-
diate drainage" ("ZZ" of USGS) were estimated by using the mean
2
annual nutrient loads, in kg/km /yr, for Clark Creek at Station C-l,
2
and multiplying the means by the ZZ area in km .
Nutrient loads for the city of Annapolis wastewater treat-
ment plant were estimated at 1.134 kg P and 3.401 kg N/capita/yr.
Nutrient loads for the city of Greenville (septic tanks, popula-
tion 328) were estimated at 0.1134 kg P and 4.263 kg N/capita/yr.
-------
13
A. Waste Sources:
1. Known municipal -
Population Mean Flow Receiving
Name Served Treatment* (m3/d x IP3) Water
Annapolis 330 Stabilization 0.125** Big Creek
pond
2. Known industrial - See discussion, pages 2-3.
Missouri Department of Natural Resources, manuscript.
**Estimated at 0.3785 m3/capita/day.
-------
14
B. Annual Total Phosphorus Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
% of
Source kg P/yr total
a. Tributaries (nonpoint load) -
A-2 St. Francis River 28,385 88.8
C-l Clark Creek 290 0.9
b. Minor tributaries and immediate
drainage (nonpoint load) - 2,545 . 8.0
c. Known municipal STP's -
Annapolis 375 1.2
d. Septic tanks* - 40 0.1
Greenville . 35 0.1
e. Known industrial - see discussion,
pages 2-3.
f. Direct precipitation** - 290 0.9
Totals 31,960 100.0
2. Output - A-l St. Francis River 52,670
3. Net annual P export*** - 20,710
*Estimate based on 105 lakeside residences, 2 camps, and 5 parks.
**Estimated (see NES Working Paper No. 175).
***Export probably due to unknown sources and/or sampling error.
-------
15
C. Annual Total Nitrogen Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
% of
Source kg N/yr total
a. Tributaries (nonpoint load) -
A-2 St. Francis River 1,155,275 84.3
C-l Clark Creek 19,845 1.5
b. Minor tributaries and immediate
drainage (nonpoint load) - 173,095 12.6
c. Known municipal STP's -
Annapolis 1,120 0.1
d. Septic tanks* - 1,435 0.1
Greenville 1,400 0.1
e. Known industrial - see discussion,
pages 2-3.
f. Direct precipitation** - 17.910 1.3
Totals 1,370,080 100.0
2. Output - A-l St. Francis River 1,526,360
3. Net annual N export*** - 156,280
*Estimated based on 105 lakeside residences, 2 camps, and 5 parks.
**Estimated (see NES Working Paper No. 175).
***Export probably due to unknown sources and/or sampling error.
-------
16
D. Mean Annual Nonpoint Nutrient Export by Subdrainage Area:
2 2
Tributary kg P/km /yr kg N/km /yr
St. Francis River 12 475
Clark Creek 3 204
E. Mean Nutrient Concentration in Ungaged Streams:
Mean Total P Mean Total N
Tributary (mg/1) (mg/1)
B-l West Fork Lost Creek 0.013 1.594
D-l Big Creek 0.019 0.971
E-l Dry Creek 0.017 0.680
F-l Trace Creek 0.022 1.059
Nutrient levels for the above tributaries are consistent with
those levels found in Clark Creek at Station C-l.
-------
17
F. Yearly Loadings:
In the following table, the existing phosphorus annual
loading is compared to the relationship proposed by Vollenweider
(1975). Essentially, his eutrophic loading is that at which
the receiving waters would become eutrophic or remain eutrophic;
his oligotrophic loading is that which would result in the
receiving water remaining oligotrophic or becoming oligotrophic
if morphometry permitted. A mesotrophic loading would be
considered one between eutrophic and oligotrophic.
Note that Vollenweider's model may not apply to lakes with
short hydraulic retention times or in which light penetration is
severely restricted by high concentrations of suspended solids
in the surface waters.
Total Yearly
Phosphorus Loading
(g/m2/yr)
Estimated loading for Lake Wappapello 1.93
Vollenweider's eutrophic loading 1.65
Vollenweider's oligotrophic loading 0.83
-------
18
V. LITERATURE REVIEWED
Missouri Department of Natural Resources (manuscript). Water
Quality Management Basin Plan for Lower Mississippi River
Basin. Water Quality Program, Division of Environmental Quality,
Jefferson City, Missouri.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1975. National Eutrophi-
cation Survey Methods 1973-1976. Working Paper No. 175.
National Environmental Research Center, Las Vegas, Nevada, and
Pacific Northwest Environmental Research Laboratory, Corvallis,
Oregon.
Vollenweider, R. A. 1975. Input-Output Models With Special
Reference to the Phosphorus Loading Concept in Limnology.
Schweiz. Z. Hydrol. 37:53-84.
-------
19
VI. APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
CONVERSION FACTORS
-------
CONVERSION FACTORS
Hectares x 2.471 = acres
Kilometers x 0.6214 = miles
Meters x 3.281 = feet
Cubic meters x 8.107 x 10" = acre/feet
Square kilometers x 0.3861 = square miles
Cubic meters/sec x 35.315 = cubic feet/sec
Centimeters x 0.3937 = inches
Kilograms x 2.205 = pounds
Kilograms/square kilometer x 5.711 = Ibs/square mile
-------
APPENDIX B
TRIBUTARY FLOW DATA
-------
TRIBUTARY FLO* I^FO^MA' JQ^ FOR MISSOURI
02/2^/77
t CODE 2906
WAPPAPELLO RESERVOIR
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA OF LAKEISO «M) 3395.5
2906A1
2906A2
290cCl
29J6U1
2906ZZ
5UB-OHAINAGE
A^tAlSQ KM) -JAN
3395.5
1996.9
97.1
435.1
865.1
50.<»0
39.79
0.37
14. 16
TOTAL
SUM OF
F L 3 MA* A P K
63.71 73.91 87.73
39.64 52.95 61.73
0.65 1.05 1.02
3.71 5.35 5.69
14.67 19.82 ' 22.82
DRAINAGE AREA OF LAKE =
SUB-DRAINAGE AREAS =
MAY
73.06
42.76
1.27
6.51
16.85
3395.5
3394.2
NORMALIZED f LOWS (CMS)
J:JN JOL AUG
39.64
24.69
0.65
3.91
9.74
SUMr
22. S4
6.65
0.62
2.66
3.37
^ AH Y
11.72
0.16
1.03
1.78
TOTAL FLOW
TOTAL FLOW
iEP
11.55
4.90
0.34
1.61
2.32
IN =
OUT =
OCT
ll.4t
8.75
0.31
1.78
3.62
502
508
NOV
23.56
19.37
0.22
1.56
7.05
.73
.97
OcC
39.64
26.82
0.24
1.47
9.54
<£AM
42.26
27.58
0.56
3. 16
10.45
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS'CMS)
TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAR MEAN FLOW DAY
2906A1
FLOW UAY
FLOW OAY
FLOW
2906A2
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
t*
5
6
7
8
74
74
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
74
74
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
30.724
12.828
64.846
47.855
91.463.
105.339
148.097
141.018
79.004
9.741
9.599
11.808
10.902
6.513
53.80?
13.451
69.659
99.392
109.586
70.326
4U.493
5.182
4.049
8.184
15
19
3
7
11
1
2
17
11
7
13
23
14
19
3
8
11
1
2
6
11
8
12
24
21.238
16.424
18.972
6.230
165.370
9d.259
198.501
10.19^ 19
104.772 24
11.610
10.194
15.008
10.619
9.061
35.679
13.875
597.485
365.287
46.156
31.998 19
64.562 24
4.955
4. 389
4.106
24.919
28.883
22.229
9.911
-------
7-MBUTAi^y FLO* IMPUTATION FOR MISSOURI
02/2^/77
LAKE CODE
wAPPAPELLU
MEAN MONTHLY ^LOwS AND DAILY FLOWS(CMS)
TKIBUTARY
29U6C1
290bOI
2906ZZ
YEAR
o
10
11
12
1
?
3
tt
5
6
7
8
C)
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
1?
1
t
3
4
5
6
7
8
74
74
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
74
74
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
74
74
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
MEAN
DAY
DAY
FLO*
FLOW
n.765
0.227
0.623
0.113
0.651
1.6-2
2.180
1.161
1.218
0.651
0.623
0.340
3.596
1.331
t.304
0.736
4.219
9.316
11.072
6.485
6.173
0.821
1.75ft
2.152
5.097
2.690
19.567
4.757
24.834
36.612
41.059
25.967
15.94?
2.209
2.152
3.568
!<•
18
3
8
11
1
2
6
11
8
12
24
14.
19
3
8
11
1
2
6
11
8
12
24
0.566
0.283
0.425
0.340
5.522
5.947
1.076
0. /08
1.756
0.227
0.368
0.227
3.543
2.407
5.097
1.982
36.246
34.263
6.796
4.814
11.327
1.133
1.699
1.133
19
24
19
24
0.566
0.396
3.398
2.265
-------
APPENDIX C
PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL DATA
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DAlf 77/0?/?4
290601
37 55 44.0 090 17 12.0 3
HAPPAPELLC
29223 MISSOURI
072291
/TYPA/AMBNT/LAKi"
11EPALES 04001002
0020 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
DATE
FROM
TO
74/04/09
74/06/18
74/1C/08
DATE
FROM
TO
74/04/09
74/06/18
74/10/08
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
15 30 0000
15 30 0005
15 30 0015
15 30 0000
15 30 0005
15 30 0015
15 30 0023
15 20 0000
15 20 0005
15 20 0016
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
15 30 0000
15 30 OOOb
15 30 0015
15 30 0000
15 30 0005
15 30 0015
15 30 0023
15 20 0000
15 ?0 0005
15 20 0006
15 20 0016
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
12.8
12.5
12.0
25.4
25.4
24.9
23.7
17.4
17.2
17.2
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.030
0.028
0.030
0.033
0,031
0.028
0.024
0.038
0.027
0.032
00300
DO
MG/L
10.6
10.2
8.6
8.6
8.0
6.2
9.8
9.0
9.2
32217
CHLRPHYL
A
UG/L
12.4
10.0
14.4
00077
TR4NSP
SECCHI
INCHES
28
72
44
00031
INCDT LT
REMNING
PERCENT
1.0
00094
CNOUCTVY
FIELD
MICROMHO
127
126
124
160
160
158
153
157
157
159
00400
PH
SU
8.10
7.95
7.90
8.10
8.30
8.20
7.80
8.05
7.89
7.91
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
64
67
67
67
69
68
93
88
88
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.060
0.020
0.020
0.020
0.030
0.050
0.130
0.060
0.110
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.400
0.200
0.200
0.400
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.500
0.200K
0.200K
00630
N02&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.10C
0.050
0.060
0.040
0.040
0.060
0.050
0.040
0.050
00671
PHOS-OIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.005
0.003
0.003
0.002
0.010
0.004
0.006
0.004
0.004
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 77/02/24
DATE
FROM
TO
7<*/04/09
74/06/18
74/10/08
TIME
OF
DAY
15 05
15 05
15 05
15 05
16 00
16 00
16 00
16 00
16 00
16 00
16 00
16 00
16 00
DEPTH
FEET
0000
0005
0015
0028
0000
OOC5
0015
0025
0036
0000
0005
0015
0029
OC010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
12.2
11.9
11.5
11.5
25.0
24.6
22.5
21.5
21.3
17.1
16.9
16.9
16.8
290602
37 57 33.0 090. 19 08.0 3
WAPPAPELL- RESERVOIR
39233 MISSOURI
072291
HEP,
-LES
0400
0033 FEET DEPTh CLASS
00300
DO
MG/L
10.2
9.8
9.8
8.6
8.8
6.2
5.4
5.6
9.4
8.6
8.4
8.8
00077
TRANSP
SECCHI
INCHES
25
60
32
0009
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 77
/TYPA/AMtfNT/LAKE
DATE
FROM
TO
74/04/09
74/06/18
74/10/03
U0665 32217 00031
TIME DEPTH PHOS-TOT ChLRPHVL INCDT LT
OF A REMNING
DA/ FEET
15
15
15
15
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
05
05
05
05
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0000
0005
0015
0028
0000
0005
0010
0015
0025
0036
0000
0005
0006
0015
0029
MG/L P UG/L PERCENT
0.052 6.8
0.036
0.030
0.033
0.048 12.8
0.027
0.024
0.023
•0.045
0.039 11.0
0.033
0.032
0.030
1.0
1.0
290602
37 57 33.0 090 19 08.0
WAPPAPELLU RESERVOH
29223 MISSOURI
072291
11EPALES
0033 FEET
04001002
DEPTH CLASS 00
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL OATE 77/02/24
/TYPA/AMcSNT/L.AKE
DATE
FROM
TO
74/04/09
74/06/18
74/10/08
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
12 40 0000
12 40 0005
12 40 0015
13 05 0000
13 05 0005
13 05 0010
13 05 0016
12 20 0000
12 20 0005
12 20 0018
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
11.9
11.4
10.7
25.1
24.4
22. S
21.2
16.9
16.8
16. 8
290603
37 00 11.0 090 20 05.0 3
WAPPAPELLJ
29223 MISSOURI
100691
11EPALE5
04001002
0013 FEET DEPTH CLASS
00300
DO
MG/L
9.6
9.8
8.8
8.6
6.0
4.0
9.2
9.2
8.6
00077
TRANSP
SECCHI
INCHES
20
72
27
00094
CNOUCTVY
FIELD
MIC30MHO
65
63
63
125
121
120
107
139
139
139
00400
PH'
su
7 .50
7.40
7.30
8.40
8.10
7.50
7.20
7.83
7.85
7.77
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
29
28
28
53
52
50
62
87
85
85
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.060
0.040
0.040
0.040
0.020
0.030
0.030
0.070
0.060
0.050
00
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.400
0.300
0.300
0.400
0.300
0.300
0.400
0.600
0.200
0.300
00630
N02kN03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.070
0.060
0.040
0.050
0.020
0.040
0.040
0.060
0.030
0.030
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.005
0.004
0.003
0.003
0.002
0.002
0.004
0.005
0.004
0.004
DATE
FROM
TO
74/04/09
74/06/18
74/10/08
00665 32217 00031
TIME DEPTH PHOS-TOT CHLRPHYL INCDT LT
OF A REMNING
DAY FEET
12
12
12
13
13
13
13
12
12
12
12
40
40
40
05
95
05
05
20
?0
20
20
0000
0005
0015
0000
0005
0010
0016
0000
0005
0007
0013
MG/L P UG/L PERCENT
0
0
0
0
0
0
i\
0
0
0
.038 9.8
.041
.043
.031 3.0
.034
.036
.053
.030 9.9
.044
.044
1.0
1.0
-------
ST-J^ET RETRIEVAL DATE 77/02/24
DATE
FnOM
TO
74/04/09
74/06/18
74/10/08
TIME
OF
DAY
1? 20
12 20
12 20
12 20
12 45
12 45
12 45
12 45
12 50
12 50
12 50
12 50
DEPTH
FEET
0000
OOOb
0015
0024
0000
0005
0015
0031
0000
0005
0015
0026
00010
A'ATER
TEMP
CENT
12.1
11.5
11.5
11.3
22.2
21.9
20. <*
19.8
17.3
17.2
16.9
16.3
290604
37 58 27.0 090 21 40.0 3
wAPPAPELLO
29223 MISSOURI
072291
11EPALES 0^001002
0028 FEtT OEPTH CLASS 00
00300
DO
MG/L
10.0
9.6
9.8
8.6
8.4
5.4
5.2
9.8
9.4
7.9
6.0
00077
TRANSP
SECCHI
INCHES
18
42
44
00094
CNDUCTVY
FIELD
MICnOMHO
139
139
137
138
" 138
137
113
105
205
201
201
203
00400
PH
su
7.6(1
7.60
7.60
7.60
8.40
7.70
7.30
7.20
7.83
7.85
7.49
7.21
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
73
80
79
78
68
65
53
49
121
116
119
118
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.040
0.060
0.050
0.040
0.020
0.030
0.050
0.080
0.100
0.060
0.100
0.110
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.300
0.200
0.200K
0.200K
0.400
0.400
0.300
0.300
0.700
0.200
0.200K
0..200K
00630
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.140
0.170
0.160
0.140
0.040
0.060
0. 140
0.160
0.020K
0.020K
0.030
0.090
00671
PnOS-DIS
ORTHU
MG/L P
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.005
0.005
0.006
0.011
0.004
0.003
.0.003
0.004
DATE
FROM
TO
74/04/09
74/06/18
,
74/10/08
0066S 32217 00031
TIME DEPTH PHOS-TOT CHLRPHYL INCDT LT
OF A REMNING
DAY FEET
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
1?
12
?0
?0
20
?0
45
45
45
45
45
50
50
50
50
50
0000
0005
0015
0024
0000
0005
0008
0015
0031
0000
0005
0007
0015
0026
MG/L P UG/L PERCENT
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.020 3.6
.023
.022
.026
.040 8.9
.046
.053
.068
.030 13.1
.037
.037
.052
1.0
1.0
-------
APPENDIX D
TRIBUTARY DATA
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 77/02/24
/TYPA/AM6NT/STREAM
DATE TIME DEPTH N02S.N03
FROM OF
TO DAY FEET
2906A1
36 55 41.0 090 15 55.0 4
ST FRANCI? RIVER
29 7.5 KAPPAPcLLG
o/LAist WAPPAPELLO 100692
BROG 1.2 M* QwNSTRM FKOM tfAPPAPELLO DAM
11EPALES 04001004
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
74/09/15
74/10/19
74/11/03
74/12/07
75/01/11
75/02/01
75/33/02
75/04/17
75/04/19
75/05/11
75/05/24
75/06/07
75/07/13
75/08/23
09
10
14
15
10
14
10
11
09
10
09
14
10
10
uS
35
30
15
40
20
15
05
50
45
45
30
45
45
0630
S.N03
OTAL
>G/L
0.100
0.024
0.016
0.128
0.220
0.320
0.270
0.130
0.080
0.070
0.055
0.020
0.010
0.010
00625
TOT KJF.L
N
MG/L
1.60C
1.200
0.900
1.200
1.500
1.500
1.200
0.750
1.050
0.400
0.650
0.750
0.450
o.eoo
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.040
0.020
0.035
0.020
0.056
0.040
0.272
0.060
0.138
0.050
0.075
0.055
0.050
0.040
00671
PHOS-OIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.005
0.005K
0.005
0.005
0.010
0.008K
0.016
0.015
0.010
0.005
0.007
0.005
0.005K
0.010
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.040
0.025
0.010
0.030
0.050
0.040
0.070
0.060
0.050
0.030
0.020
0.040
0.030
0.040
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 77/c-?/24
/TYPA/A^eNT/STREAM
2<50t>A2
37 11 40.0 090 30 12.0 4
ST FRANCIS KIVER
7.5 PATTERSON
WAPPAPELLO 100b91
ST HWY 34 b-(DG 2.5 Ml E OF PATTERSON
11EPALES ' 04001004
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
29
DATE
FROM OF
TO DAY
TIME DEPTH
FEET
74/09/14
74/10/19
74/11/03
74/12/08
75/01/11
75/03/02
75/04/06
75/04/19
75/05/11
75/05/34
75/06/08
75/07/12
75/08/24
14 15
11 00
14 40
10 00
11 ?0
10 10
10 SO
10 30
10 15
09 45
10 40
13 55
10 20
00630
N02oN03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.2CO
0.024
0.112
0.136'
0.1 68
0.420
0.2BO
0.075
0.160
0.040
0.160
0.185
0.165
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.700
1.300
1.000
1.000
1.700
1.000
0.600
0.250
3.950
0.050K
0.650
0.750
0.800
OC610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.030
0.095
0.055
0.010
0.301
0.040
0.035
0.015
0.060
0.015
0.020
0.100
0.030
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
O.OOS
O.OOSK
0.025
O.OOSK
0.025
0.008K
O.OOSK
0.005
0.015
0.005
0.005K
0.015
0.030
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.015
0.010
0.050
0.010K
0.170
0.020
0.020
0.010
0.035
0.010K
0.010
0.082
0.060
K VALUE *nOWh TO SE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
SfO*ET RETRIEVAL DATE 77/02/24
DATE TIME DEPTH N02
FROM OF
TO DAY FEET
75/01/11
75/02/01
75/03/02
75/04/17
75/05/11
10 45
13 30
09 40
10
09
15
45
2906dl
37 03 15.0 090 19 30.0 4
w FO*K L05T CREEK
29 7.5 SHUOK
T/LAK.E tfAPPAPELtO 100691
BRDG ON H*v 12 1.5 MI NW OF SHOOK
11EPALES 04001004
0000 FEET OEPTH CLASS 00
10630
?S,N03
•QTAL
-------
STCRET RETRIEVAL CATF. 77/02/24
2906C1
37 11 30.0 090 32 20.0 4
CLflRK CREE1"
29 7.5 PATTERSON
T/LAKE rfAPPAFELLO 100691
OLD ST HWY 34 bRDG 0.6 MI E OF PATTERSON
11EPALES 04Q0100H
0000 FEET OEPTH CLASS 00
DATE
FROM
TO
74/09/14
74/10/18
74/11/03
74/12/08
75/01/11
75/02/01
75/03/02
75/04/06
75/04/19
75/05/11
75/05/24
75X06/08
75/07/12
75/08/24
TIME OES>T>
OF
DAY FEET
14
10
14
09
11
14
10
10
10
10
09
10
13
10
20
30
15
50
15
?5
00
10
30
30
30
20
45
00
00630 00625
i N02S.N03 TOT KJEL
N-TOTAL N
MG/L
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.200
.096
.256
.240
.292
.232
.280
.220
.135
.140
.210
.315
.185
.210
MG/L
•
•
•
•
•
•
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
000
000
000
400
200
000
900
900
200
450
550
650
600
200
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PhOS-DIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL OSTriO
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
040
020
055
015
164
032
048
035
005
045
055
035
040
020
MG/L
0.
Q.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
p
010
005K
015
005K
010
008
008K
005*
005
005K
005
005
010
MG/L P
0.010
0.005K
0.025
0.010K
0.050
0.020
0.010
0.010K
0.010
0.010
0.010K
0.010K
0.020
0.030
K VALUE KNOWN TO 8E
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
SFOKLT RETRIEVAL DATE 77/02/24
2S0601
37 15 40.0 090 30 30.0 4
29 7.5 r.rJUNOT
T/LAK£ rfAPPAPELLO 100691
B^OG ON H*Y 143 5.5 MI S£ OF oRUNOT
1 IE-ALES 04001004
0000 FEET OEPTh CLASS 00
DATE
TO
74/09/ 14
74/10/19
74/1 1/03
74/12/08
75/01/11
75/02/01
75/03/02
75/04/06
75/04/19
75/05/11
75/05/24
75/06/08
75/07/12
75/08/24
00630 00625
TIME DEPTH NOZS.N03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TOTAL N
DAY FEET
13
10
13
09
10
14
09
09
09
10
09
09
13
09
50
00
45
35
45
10
45
45
50
18
15
50
20
45
MG/L
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.084
.056
.160
.160
.152
.120
.176
.110
.080
.055
.050
.075
.035
.030
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
i.
i.
2.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
900
600
700
600
700
000
600
850
650
200'
150
500
550
250
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PHOS-DIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL ORTrlO
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
c.
c.
0.
0.
0.
0.
C17
015
035
020
208
032
024
050
025
060
005
015
020
020
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
o.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
P
005K
005K
010
005K
005
008K
008K
010
005
OOSK
005K
OOSK
OOSK
OOSK
MG/L P
0.015
0.005K
0.020
0.010K
0.050
0.020
O.U20
0.010
0.010
0.010K
0.010K
0.010K
0.010
0.020
K VALUE KNOWN TO dE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
bTORET RETRIEVAL DAT£ 77/0?/24
/TYPA/AM3NT/STREAM
DATE TIME DEPTH N02&N03
FROM OF
TO DAY FEET
7<./09/l<»
74/10/19
74/11/03
74/12/08
75/01/1 1
75/03/01
75/04/06
75/04/19
75/05/11
75/05/24
75/06/08
75/07/12
75/08/33
11 on
11 45
09 50
10 30
13 SO
10 35
10 00
09 31
10 05
09 10
10 00
13 30
09 45
2906E1
37 22 30.0 090 23 *5.0 <«
DRY C*EEK
39 15 COL.DwATE.-J
T/LAKE WAPPAPtLLO 100691
SEC RO X1MC ? Ml rf'NW OF JCT w US ri»Y
11EPALES C4C01004
OOOC FEET DEHTn CLASS 00
0630
&N03
OTAL
•G/L
0.112
0.088
0.152
0.184
0.116
C.120
0.060
0.020
0.025
0.050
0.085
0.040
0.035
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.60C
0.600
1.000
1.400
1.200
0.300
0.250
1.000
0.100
0.050
0.250
0.450
0.550
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.020
0.055
0.010
0.152
0.024
0.045
' 0.060
0.015
0.005K
0.020
0.017
0.020
00671
PHOS-DIS
09THO
MG/L P
0.005K
3.005K
0.005
0.005K
0.005
0.006K
0.005K
0.005
0.005K
0.005K
O.OOSK
0.005K
O.OOSK
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L C
O.OOSK
O.OOSK
0.010K
0.010K
o.oao
0.010K
0.010K
0..020
0.010K
0.010K
0.010K
0.010K
0.010
K VALUE KNOdN 10 BE
LESS THAN
-------
STORCT RETRIEVAL OATE 77/02/24
/TYPA/Ai"BNT/STR£AM
00630
DATE TIME DEPTH N02S.N03
FROM OF N-TOTAL
TO DAY FEET MG/L
74/09/14
74/10/19
74/11/03
74/12/08
75/01/11
75/03/01
75/03/01
75/04/06
75/04/19
75/05/11
75/05/34
75/06/08
75/07/12
75/08/23
11 35
11 20
09 34
10 10
14 10
10 15
10 50
10 15
09 46
10 25
09 25
10 14
13 55
10 00
0.224
0.016
0.088
0.056
.0.140
0.104
0.152
0.090
0.020
0.070
0.085
0.125
0.095
0.035
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
O.BOO
0.700
0.800
1.300
2.000
0.300
0.650
0.550
1.050
2.600
0.050K
0.300
0.100
,0.550
2906F1
37 22 20.0 090 26 15.0 4
T-iiCE CREF*.
29 15 COLDWATEK
T/LAKE WAPPAPtLLG 100691
SEC «D XING .7 MI N UF SACO
11EPALES 04001004
oooo FEET DEPTH CLASS oo
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.015
0.050
0.010
0.044
0.008
0.016
0.020
0.290
0.055
O.OOSK
0.015
0.010
0.010
00671
PHOS-OIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
C.005K
O.OOSK
0.005
0.010
OiOOSK
O.OOf>K
O.OOSK
0.005*
0.005
O.OOSK
O.OOSK
O.OC5K
O.OOSK
O.OOSK
00665
PriOS-TOT
MG/L P
005
005K
010K
050
010K
OlOK
OlOK
OlOK
010
OlOK
OlOK
OlOK
OlOK
0.010K
K VALUE KNOWN TO SE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
APPENDIX E
PARAMETRIC RANKINGS OF LAKES
SAMPLED BY NES IN 1974
STATE OF MISSOURI
-------
LAKE DATA TO BE USED IN RANKINGS
LAKE
CODE LflxE MAME
-2901
2902 POMME OE
2903 STOCKTON RESERVOIR
2904 LAKE TANEYCOMQ
29ob THOMAS HILL
2906 W'APPAPELLO
MEDIAN
TOTAL u
0.017
0.043
0.022
0.023
0.082
0.033
MEDIAN
INOPT- N
' 0.150
0.275
0.670
0.530
1 .040
0.-105
500-
. MEAN SEi,
445.000
449.928
428.800
420.250
487.889
^59.667
MEAN
CHLORA
3.b67
9.4f3
8.973
• 9.825
5.787
9.642
15-
MIN 00
10.400
14.HOO
Is. 000
11.200
11.200
11.000
MEDIAN
DISS ORTHO °
0.004 .
0.008
O.OOfi
0.007
0.011
0.004
-------
Of LAKfS *!Tl-i HIGHER VALUES !\';J
MtoiA'«) MtniAN 500- MEAN- 15-
DISS 0-T>-0
VO ( 4)
?902 POMfE DE TEk^c *E>ERVnlR 20 { 1) o(j ( 3) "0 ! 2) 40 i 2) 20 ( 1) 20 ( 1 )
2903 STOCKTON rtESFUVOlK HO (4) 20 ( 1) 90 ( *> hO ( 3) 0(0) 60 ( 3)
KE TANEYCOMQ *ft (3) 40 < 2) 100 < S) 0(0) bO < 2) 40 (
0 ( 0)
290*- WAPPAPELLO -^ESES\/iiIH <*0 ( ?) 100 (5) 20 ( 1 ) 20 ( 1 ) BO ( 4) S»0 ( 4)
;:jM«F4 uF l.4KE< *ITH Ml'
MEnlAii MtDIAN
TOT6L p IMOPG iv
10" ( S) -»0 ( 4)
21 (1) o(j ( 3)
HO (4) 20 ( 1)
fn (3) 40 < 2)
0(0) 0(0)
<*0 ( ?) 100 ( 5)
-,HF>* VALUES)
500- MEAN-
MEAN ^EC C'-'LOKA
f.0 ( T) 100 ( h)>
4T, ! 2) 40 i 2)
90 ( t) ftO ( 3)
100 < S) 0(0)
0(0) 80 ( 4)
20 (1) 20 ( 1)
15-
MIN no
100
20
0
bO
50
00
(
(
(
( ,
( '
(
------- |