U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
WORKING PAPER SERIES
REPORT
ON
ARBUCKLE LAKE
MURRAY COUNTY
OKLAHOMA
EPA REGION VI
WORKING PAPER NO,
CORVALLIS ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY - CORVALLIS, OREGON
and
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING & SUPPORT LABORATORY - LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
699-440
-------
REPORT
ON
ARBUCKLE LAKE
MURRAY CQUNIY
OKLAHOMA
EPA REGION VI
WORKING PAPER NO, 582
WITH THE COOPERATION OF THE
OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF POLLUTION CONTROL
AND THE
OKLAHOMA NATIONAL GUARD
MARCH, 1977
-------
REPORT ON ARBUCKLE LAKE
MURRAY COUNTY, OKLAHOMA
EPA REGION VI
by
National Eutrophication Survey
Water and Land Monitoring Branch
Monitoring Applications Laboratory
Environmental Monitoring & Support Laboratory
Las Vegas, Nevada
and
Eutrophication Survey Branch
Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory
Corvallis, Oregon
Working Paper No. 582
OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
March 1977
-------
CONTENTS
Page
Foreword i i
List of Oklahoma Study Lakes iv
Lake and Drainage Area Map v
Sections
I. Conclusions 1
II. Lake and Drainage Basin Characteristics 4
III. Lake Water Quality Summary 6
IV. Nutrient Loadings 12
V. Literature Reviewed 17
VI. Appendices 18
-------
ii
FOREWORD
The National Eutrophicatlon Survey was Initiated in 1972 in
response to an Administration commitment to investigate the nation-
wide threat of accelerated eutrophication to freshwater lakes and
reservoirs.
OBJECTIVES
The Survey was designed to develop, in conjunction with state
environmental agencies, information on nutrient sources, concen-
trations, and impact on selected freshwater lakes as a basis for
formulating comprehensive and coordinated national, regional, and
state management practices relating to point source discharge
reduction and nonpoint source pollution abatement in lake water-
sheds.
ANALYTIC APPROACH
The mathematical and statistical procedures selected for the
Survey's eutrophication analysis are based on related concepts
that:
a. A generalized representation or model relating
sources, concentrations, and impacts can be
constructed.
b. By applying measurements of relevant parameters
associated with lake degradation, the generalized
model can be transformed into an operational
representation of a lake, its drainage basin, and
related nutrients.
c. With such a transformation, an assessment of the
potential for eutrophication control can be made.
LAKE ANALYSIS
In this report, the first stage of evaluation of lake and
watershed data collected from the study lake and its drainage
basin is documented. The report is formatted to provide state
environmental agencies with specific information for basin
f tanning [§303(e)], water quality criteria/standards review
§303(c)], clean lakes [§314(a,b)], and water quality monitoring
[§106 and §305(b)] activities mandated by the Federal Water
Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972.
-------
Beyond the single lake analysis, broader based correlations
between nutrient concentrations (and loading) and trophic condition
are being made to advance the rationale and data base for refine-
ment of nutrient water quality criteria for the Nation's freshwater
lakes. Likewise, multivariate evaluations for the relationships
between land use, nutrient export, and trophic condition, by lake
class or use, are being developed to assist in the formulation of
planning guidelines and policies by the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency and to augment plans implementation by the states.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The staff of the National Eutrophication Survey (Office of
Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency)
expresses sincere appreciation to the Oklahorra Department of
Pollution Control for professional involvement, to the Oklahoma
National Guard for conducting the tributary sampling phase of the
Survey, and to those Oklahoma wastewater treatment plant operators
who provided effluent samples and flow data.
Dr. Denver Talley, Director, Oklahoma Department of Pollution
Control; the staff of the Oklahoma Water Resources Board; and the
staff of the Oklahoma State Department of Health reviewed the pre-
liminary reports and provided critiques most useful in the prepara-
tion of this Working Paper Series.
Major General John Coffey, Jr., the Adjutant General of
Oklahoma, and Project Officers Colonel Curtis W. Milligan and
Major James 0. Haney, Jr., who directed the volunteer efforts of
the Oklahoma National Guardsmen, are also gratefully acknowledged
for their assistance to the Survey.
-------
IV
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
STUDY LAKES
STATE OF OKLAHOMA
LAKE NAME
Altus Reservoir
Arbuckle Lake
Lake Elsworth
Lake Eufaula
Fort Cobb Reservoir
Fort Supply Reservoir
Foss Dam Reservoir
Lake Frances
Grand Lake 0' The Cherokees
Lake Hefner
Keystone Reservoir
Oologah Lake
Tenkiller Ferry Reservoir
Lake Thunderbird
Wister Reservoir
COUNTY
Greer, Kiowa
Murray
Caddo, Comanche
Haskell, Mclntosh,
Okmulgee, Pittsburg
Caddo
Woodward
Custer
Adair
Mayes, Delaware, Craig,
Ottowa
Oklahoma
Tulsa, Creek, Osage, Pawnee
Nowata, Rogers
Cherokee, Sequoyah
Cleveland
LeFlore
-------
97°05'
I
96°55'
34 40 —
ARBUCKLE
RESERVOIR
® Tributary Sampling Site
X Lake Sampling Site
~"^ Drainage Area Boundary
AHBUCKLE
RESERVOIR
-------
REPORT ON AR3UCKLE LAKE, OKLAHOMA
STORE! NO. 4002
I. CONCLUSIONS
A. Trophic Condition:*
Arbuckle Lake is considered mesotrophic, based
upon Survey data and field observations. Chlorophyll a^
values ranged from 2.3 yg/1 in the summer to 12.5 yg/1
in the spring, with a mean of 7.0 yg/1. Potential for
primary production as measured by algal assay control
yield was low. Of the 16 Oklahoma lakes (including
Texoma Lake) sampled in 1974, 15 had higher median
total phosphorus, 13 had higher median inorganic nitro-
gen, and 14 had higher median orthophosphorus levels
than Arbuckle Lake.
Survey limnologists noted severe oxygen depression
with depth at a number of the sampling stations during
spring and summer visits to the lake, but did not ob-
serve any nuisance algal blooms or problem aquatic
macrophytes.
*See Appendix E.
-------
B. Rate-Limiting Nutrient:
Mean inorganic nitrogen to orthophosphorus (N/P) ratios
in Arbuckle Lake indicate primary limitation by nitrogen in
March and October, and phosphorus limitation during June.
Algal assay results suggest the lake was limited by available
phosphorus during the spring and autumn sampling seasons.
C. Nutrient Controllability:
1. Point sources -
No known municipal or industrial wastewater treat-
ment plants impacted Arbuckle Lake during the sampling
year. Two industrial plants (O.G. & E., and Kraft Foods)
and one municipal plant in Sulphur are known to exist;
however, their effluents are not discharged into Rock
Creek and thus do not impact Arbuckle Reservoir; There
is also a fish hatchery discharging into Buckhorn Creek,
tributary. C-l. Nutrient contributions from this source
are not known.
2
The present phosphorus loading of 0.40 g P/m /yr
is slightly above that proposed by Vollenweider (1975)
as a "eutrophic" loading (see page 17). Since the
industrial wastes from the town of Sulphur have been
diverted, nutrient loading to the reservoir has probably
-------
been reduced as much as is possible unless nonpoint
sources or other unknown contributions from the city
of Sulphur prove to be controllable.
Any addition to the existing phosphorus loading
of this lake should be carefully evaluated in order
to maintain its present high water quality.
2. Nonpoint sources -
The phosphorus contributions of nonpoint sources
accounted for 100% of the load to Arbuckle Lake. Rock
Creek contributed 28.9%, Guy Sandy Creek contributed
27.2%, and ungaged tributaries were estimated to have
contributed 39.6%.
The phosphorus exports of the two tributaries
(Section IV-D) impacting Arbuckle Reservoir were some-
what higher than the rates of tributaries in nearby
Texoma Lake (in press); e.g. Washita River (4 kg P/km2/yr)
and Sandy Creek (7 kg P/km2/yr).
-------
II. LAKE AND DRAINAGE BASIN CHARACTERISTICS
Lake and drainage basin characteristics are itemized
below. Lake surface area and mean depth were provided by the
Oklahoma Department of Pollution Control; maximum depth was
provided by the Oklahoma Water Resources Board. Tributary
flow data were provided by the Oklahoma District Office of
the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). Outlet drainage area in-
cludes the lake surface area. Mean hydraulic retention time
was obtained by dividing the lake volume by mean flow of the
outlet. Precipitation values are estimated by methods as
outlined in National Eutrophication Survey (NES) Working
Paper No. 175. A table of metric/English conversions is in-
cluded as Appendix A.
A. Lake Morphometry:
1. Surface area: 9.51 knr.
2. Mean depth: 9.4 meters.
3. Maximum depth: 28.6 meters.
4. Volume: 89.394 x 106 m3.
5. Mean hydraulic retention time: 1,176 days (3.2 yrs)
-------
B. Tributary and Outlet:
(See Appendix B for flow data)
1. Tributaries -
Drainage Mean Flow
Name area (km?) (m3/sec_)
A-2 Rock Creek 101.8 0.42
B-l Guy Sandy Creek 89.1 0.36
Minor tributaries and
immediate drainage - 126.0 0.56
Totals 316.9 1.34
2. Outlet - A-l Rock Creek 326.3 0.88
C. Precipitation:
1. Year of sampling: 110.9 cm.
2. Mean annual: 95.2 cm.
-------
III. LAKE WATER QUALITY SUMMARY
Arbuckle Lake was sampled three times during the open-
water season of 1974 by means of a pontoon-equipped Huey heli-
copter. Each time, samples for physical and chemical parameters
were collected from four stations on the lake (Station 01 was
only sampled twice) and from a number of depths at each station
(see map, page v). During each visit, depth-integrated samples
were collected from each station for chlorophyll ^analysis and
phytoplankton identification and enumeration. During the first
and last visits, 18.9-liter depth-integrated samples were com-
posited for algal assays. Maximum depths sampled were 24.4
meters at Station 01, 8.5 meters at Station 02, 6.1 meters at
Station 03, and 14.6 meters at Station 04. For a more detailed
explanation of NES methods, see NES Working Paper No. 175.
The results obtained are presented in full in Appendix C
and are summarized in III-A for waters at the surface and at
the maximum depth for each site. Results of the phytoplankton
counts and chlorophyll ^determinations are included in III-B.
Results of the limiting nutrient study are presented in III-C.
-------
ARBUCKLE LAKE
CODE. 400?
PAPA-lETER
N«
PHYSlCAl AMD CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS
( 3/30/74 ) ( 6/13/74 )
MAX MAX
S»o« = 3 DEPTH s«t«o = 4 DEPTH
PANGE RANGE
RANGE MEDIAN (METErtS) N» HANoE MEDIAN (METERS)
( 10/23/74 )
MAX
S««» = 4 DEPTH
HANGE
> W f > E P T n
DISSOLVED O*THO
0 • - 1 • "•> M OtPTH
MA" DEPTH**
fj(j 3»MQ3 (MO/L )
O'.-l .5 t>TP
MAX fiEPTH»o
AMMONIA («G/L)
n.-l.S M DEPTH
MAX ufPTti**
KJtLUAHL N (M'.i/L
C.-l .5 M DEPTH
4
2
(M(j/|. ) .
2
2
4
2
Tb)
4
2
6
3
b
3
P (MG/L)
6
3
3
6
)
6
3
12.5-
9.8-
7.0-
321.-
324.-
8.2-
8.0-
155.-
O.U12-0
0.017-0
0.007-0
0.008-0
0. 030-0
0.010-U
0.030-0
0.0*0-0
0 .300-0
U . .1 0 0 - 0
15.1
11.8
10.0
9.0
405.
330.
8.3
8.1
185.
174.
.036
.Old
.012
.ooy
.030
.050
.040
.120
.400
.600
12.9
10. b
8.0
327.
J27.
P.i
8.0
1 6 n .
166.
O.Old
0.016
0.006
O.OOd
0.0?0
0.030
0.04U
0.040
0.350
0.300
0.0-
7.6-
1.5-
7.6-
0.0-
7.6-
0.0-
7.6-
0.0-
6.1-
0.0-
0.0-
6.1-
0.0-
6.1-
0.0-
6.1-
0.0-
6.1-
1.5
24.4
1.5
24.4
1.5
?4.4
1.5
24.4
24.4
1.5
?4.4
1.5
24.4
1.5
1.5
24.4
1.5
24.4
8
4
7
4
tt
4
rt
4
P
4
6
4
M
4
8
4
ft.
4
26.1-
14.9-
7.6-
0.8-
418.-
374.-
8.3-
8.1-
156.-
157.-
0.013-0
0.017-0
0.004-0
O.U06-0
0.020-0
0.030-0
O.OPO-u
0.030-0
0.400-1
o.400-o
27.7
25.3
6.4
5.4
492.
523.
8.8
H.5
167.
188.
.029
.045
.009
.015
.070
.170
.070
.280
.300
.700
26.8
21.1
8.0
0.9
424.
403.
8.6
8.3
158.
183.
0.017
0.027
0.005
0.007
0.030
0. 0^5
0.035
0.100
0.550
0.600
0.0-
6.1-
0.0-
. 6.1-
0.0-
b.l-
0.0-
6.1-
0.0-
6.1-
0.0-
b.l-
0.0-
6.1-
0.0-
6.1-
0.0-
6.1-
0.0-
6.1-
1.5
24.4
1.5
24.4
1.5
24.4
1.5
24.4
1.5
24.4
l.S
24.4
1.5
24.4
1.5
24.4
1.5
24.4
1.5
24.4
8
4
8
4
8
4
ft
4
8
4
8
4
*
4
4
8
4
4
18.8- 19.0
18.1- 18.9
7.0- 0.2
0.4- 8.6
369.- 381.
369.- 417.
8.0- 8.3
7.5- 8.3
150.- 153.
152.- 177.
0.018-0.037
0. 026-0. 07«
0.004-0.013
0.006-0.022
0.020-0.050
0.020-0.030
0.020-0.210
0.020-0.880
0..ioO-O.SUO
O.?00-1.300
18.9
18.5
7. 8
7.9
373.
409.
8.1
9.1
152.
163.
0.021
0.029
0.004
0.011
0.030
0.02U
0.035
0.0?5
0.450
0.350
0.0-
5.5-
0.0-
5.5-
0.0-
5.5-
0.0-
5.5-
0.0-
5.5-
0.0-
5.5-
0.0-
5.5-
0.0-
5.5-
0.0-
5.5-
0.0-
5.5-
1.5
23.8
1.5
?3.a
1.5
23.8
1.5
23.8
1.5
23.8
1.5
23. H
1.5
23. B
1.5
23. B
1.5
?3.H
1.3
23.0
StCCHl DISC (f'ETh-(S)
0.8- 1.9 1.4
0.9- 2.1 1.3
1.3- 1.6 1.5
* N' = NO. OF s
««* MAXIMUM UtHTH SAMPLED AT EACH SITt
*«* s = NO. OK SITES SAMPLED ON
-------
B. Biological Characteristics:
1. Phytoplankton -
Sampling
Date
03/30/74
06/12/74
10/23/74
Dominant
Genera
1. Melosira
2. Chroomonas
3. Cyclotella
4. Cryptomonas
5. Scenedesmus
Other genera
Total
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Melosira
Pediastrum
Cryptomonas
Anabaena •
Mougeotia
Other genera
Total
Melosira
Oocystis
Scenedesmus
Anabaena
Chroomonas
Other genera
Total
Algal
Units
per ml
11
,759
450
450
250
200
451
13,560
478
191
143
95
95
287
1,289
196
164
146
98
98
558
1,260
-------
2. Chlorophyll a_ -
Sampling Station Chlorophyll
Date Number (yg/1 )
03/30/74 01 10.2
02 11.5
03 12.5
04 ----
06/12/74 01 2.4
02 3.7
03 2.3
04 2.5
10/23/74 01 7.7
02 9.2
03 9.1
04 6.2
-------
10
C. Limiting Nutrient Study:
1. Autoclaved, filtered, and nutrient spiked -
Ortho P
Spike(mg/l) Conc.(mg/l)
a. 03/30/74
Control
0.05 P
0.05 P + 1.0 N
1.00 N
0.005
0.055
0.055
0.005
Inorganic N
Conc.(mg/l )
0.042
0.042
1.042
1.042
Maximum Yield
(mg/l-dry wt. )
0.2
2.2
22.0
0.1
b. 10/23/74
Control 0.013 0.053 0.3
0.05 P 0.063 0.058 1.5
0.05 P + 1.0 N 0.063 1.058 16.7
1.00 N 0.013 1.058 0.3
2. Discussion -
The control yields of the assay alga, Selenastrum
capricornutum, indicate that the potential for primary
productivity in Arbuckle Lake was low during both March
and October samplings. In both assays, there was a
significant increase in yield over that of the control
when orthophosphorus was added but a lack of yield response
when nitrogen alone was added. The maximum increase in
yield over that of the control was achieved with the
simultaneous addition of both nutrients. Based on these
results, phosphorus limitation is indicated, However, it
should be noted that there were substantial changes in
-------
11
nutrient levels between the collection and assay of the
water samples. Therefore, the assay may not accurately
reflect the nutrient limitation situation in the lake at
the time of collection.
N/P ratios in the lake data were 10/1 and less than
11/1 in March and October, respectively, suggesting primary
limitation by nitrogen in Arbuckle Lake, and 15/1 in June,
suggesting phosphorus limitation at that time (a mean N/P
ratio of 14/1 or greater generally reflects phosphorus limi-
tation).
-------
12
IV. NUTRIENT LOADINGS
(See Appendix D for data)
For the determination of nutrient loadings, the Oklahoma
National Guard collected monthly near-surface grab samples from
each of the tributary sites indicated on the map (page v), ex-
cept for the high runoff month of May when two samples were
generally collected. Sampling was begun in November 1974, and
was completed in October 1975.
Through an interagency agreement, stream flow estimates
for the year of sampling and a "normalized" or average year
were provided by the Oklahoma District Office of the USGS for
the tributary sites nearest the lake.
In this report, nutrient loads for sampled tributaries
were determined by using a modification of a USGS computer pro-
gram for calculating stream loadings. Nutrient loads indicated
for tributaries are those measured minus known point source
loads, if any.
Nutrient loadings for unsampled "minor tributaries and imme-
diate drainage" ("II" of USGS) were estimated by using the mean
annual nutrient loads, in kg/km2/yr in Guy Sandy Creek, at
Station B-l, and multiplying the means by the II area in
-------
13
A. Waste Sources:
1. Known municipal - None
2. Known industrial - None
B. Annual Total Phosphorus Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
% of
Source kg P/yr total
a. Tributaries (nonpoint load) -
A-2 Rock Creek 1,100 28.9
B-l Guy Sandy Creek 1,035 27.2
b. Minor tributaries and immediate
drainage (nonpoint load) - 1,510 39.6
c. Known municipal STP's - None
d. Septic tanks - None
e. Known industrial - None
f. Direct precipitation* - 165 4.3
Totals 3,810 100.0
2. Output - A-l Rock Creek 885
3. Net annual P accumulation - 2,925
*Estimated (see NES Working Paper No. 175).
-------
14
B. Annual Total Nitrogen Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
% of
Source kg N./yr total
a. Tributaries (nonpoint load) -
A-2 Rock Creek 12,480 20.4
B-l Guy Sandy Creek 15,920 26.0
b. Minor tributaries and immediate
drainage (nonpoint load) - 22,555 36.8
c. Known municipal STP's - None
d. Septic tanks - None
e. Known industrial - None
f. Direct precipitation* - 10,265 16.8
Totals 61,220 100.0
2. Output - A-l Rock Creek 28,905
3. Net annual N accumulation - 32,315
*Estimated (see NES Working Paper No. 175).
-------
15
Mean Annual Nonpoint Nutrient Export by Subdrainage Area:
Tributary kg P/km2/yr kg N/km2/yr
Rock Creek
Guy Sandy Creek
11
12
Mean Nutrient Concentrations in Ungaged Streams:
Tributary
C-l Buckhorn Creek
Mean Total P
(mg/1)
123
179
Mean Total N
(mg/1)
0.106 1.403
Nutrient levels for tributary C-l, Buckhorn Creek, are
equivalent to those found in the two'gaged tributaries flowing
into Arbuckle Lake.
-------
16
F. Yearly Loadings:
In the following table, the existing phosphorus annual
loading is compared to the relationship proposed by Vollenweider
(1975). Essentially, his "eutrophic" loading is that at which
the receiving waters would become eutrophic or remain eutrophic;
his "oligotrophic" loading is that which would result in the
receiving water remaining oligotrophic or becoming oligotrophic
if morphometry permitted. A "mesotrophic" loading would be
considered one between "eutrophic" and "oligotrophic".
Note that Vollenweider's model may not apply to lakes with
short hydraulic retention times or in which light penetration is
severely restricted by high concentrations of suspended solids
in the surface waters.
Total Yearly
Phosphorus Loading
(g/m2/yr)
Estimated loading for Arbuckle Lake 0.40
Vollenweider's "eutrophic" loading 0.33
Vollenweider's "oligotrophic" loading 0.17
-------
17
LITERATURE REVIEWED
Vollenweider, R. A. 1975. Input-Output Models With Special
Reference to the Phosphorus Loading Concept in Limnology.
Schweiz. Z. Hydrol. 37:53-84.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1975. National Eutro-
phication Survey Methods 1973-1976. Working Paper No. 175.
National Environmental Research Center, Las Vegas, Nevada,
and Pacific Northwest Environmental Research Laboratory,
Corvallis, Oregon.
-------
18
VI. APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
CONVERSION FACTORS
-------
CONVERSION FACTORS
Hectares x 2.471 = acres
Kilometers x 0.6214 = miles
Meters x 3.281 = feet
Cubic meters x 8.107 x 10" - acre/feet
Square kilometers x 0.3861 = square miles
Cubic meters/sec x 35.315 = cubic feet/sec
Centimeters x 0.3937 - inches
Kilograms x 2.205 ~ pounds
Kilograms/square kilornstcr x 5.711 ~ Ibs/square mile
-------
APPENDIX B
TRIBUTARY FLOW DATA
-------
TRIBUTARY FLOW ISFOKMATION TOR OKLAHOMA
03/25/77
LAKE CODE 400?
ARBUCKLE LAKE
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA OF LAKE(SO KM)
SUB-DMAINAGE
TRIBUTARY AREAfSO KM)
JAN
FF8
326.3
MAR
APR
MAY
NORMALIZED FLOWS(CMS)
JUN JUL AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
DEC
MEAN
4002A1
4002A2
400281
4002ZZ
326.3
101.8
69.1
135.5
0.396 0.793 1.076 1.331
0.24 0.34 0.45 0.54
0.20 0.28 0.40 0.45
0.31 0.45 0.59 0.71
1.444
1.25
1.08
1.64
0.793
0.54
0.45
0.71
0.142
0.40
0.34
0.51
0.057
0.13
0.11
0.17
0.538
0.37
0.31
0.48
1.812
0.37
0.34
0.51
1.
0
0
0
331
.21
.lb
.28
0.
0
0
0
793
.24
.19
.31
0.875
0.42
0.36
0.56
SUMMARY
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA OF LAKE =
SUM OF SUB-DRAINAGE AREAS =
326.3
326.3
TOTAL FLOW
TOTAL FLOW
IN =
OUT *
16
10
.08
.51
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS(CMS)
TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAR MEAN FLOW DAY
4002A1
FLOW OAY
FLOW OAY
FLOW
4002A2
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
74
74
7S
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
12.743
1.274
2.832
7.646
8.212
5.097
8.495
2.124
1.246
0.241
0.237
0.227
1.104
0.193
0.311
1.076
1.218
0.821
2.662
2.549
1.189
0.453
0.210
0.221
25
10
27
11
13
9
3
11
18
8
8
20
25
10
27
11
13
9
3
11
18
8
8
20
2.832
5.380
5.380
5.380
26.901
18.4C6
5.380
5.380
0.057
0.057
0.057
0.057
0.258
0.218
C.161
0.538
1.841
1.218
10.619
6.513
0.161
0.680
0.028
0.227
0.0b7
0.680
-------
TRIBUTARY FLOW INFOHMAYiON FGrt OKLAHOMA
LAKE CODE 4003 ARBUCKLE LAKE
MEAN MONTHLY FLUWS AND DAILY FLOWS
TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAR MEAN FLOW DAY FLOW DAY FLOW DAY
u3/2b/V7
4002B1
4002Z2
11
12
1
2
3
ft
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
tt
S
6
1
8
9
10
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
0.963
0.170
0.283
0.934
1.076
0.736
2.322
2.237
1.019
0.396
0.181
0.193
1.444
0.258
0.425
1.444
1.614
1.1C4
.3.540
3.370
1.557
0.623
0.278
0.283
25
10
27
11
13
9
3
11
18
8
8
20
FLOW
0.227
0.190
0.142
0.453
1.614
1.076
9.345
5.720
0.142
0.595
0.025
0.011
18
0.595
-------
APPENDIX C
PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL DATA
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 77/03/24
/TYPA/AM8NT/LAKE.
400201
34 25 52.0 097 01 34.0 3
LAKE
OKLAHOMA
101491
11EPALES 04001002
0088 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
DATE
FROM
TO
74/03/30
74/06/12
74/10/23
TIM
OF
DAY
11
11
11
11
11
10
10
10
10
10
10
11
11
11
11
11
11
E
30
30
30
30
30
20
20
?0
20
20
20
05
05
05
05
05
05
DEPT-i
FEET
0000
0005
0015
0040
0080
0000
000*3
0020
0040
0060
0090
0000
0005
0015
0035
0055
0078
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
12.6
12.5
12.5
12.1
9.8
26.1
2t>. 1
26.1
22.7
17.5
1^.9
19.0
19.0
19.0
19.0
19.0
1H.2
00300
DO
MG/L
10.0
10.0
9.4
7.0
8.0
7.6
1.8
1.8
0.8
7.4
7.0
7.6
7.0
7.4
0.4
00077 ' 00094
TRANSP CNDUCTVV
SECCHI FIELD
INCHES MICROMHO
76 321
322
321
320
324
84 422
421
421
413
379
374
62 375
375
375
375
375
417
00400
PH
SU
8.3t
8.25
6.15
8.05
8.00
8.30
6.5G
8.55
8.30
8.30
8. 10
8.03
8.03
8.03
8.01
7.99
7.51
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
157
155
158
162
174
156
156
157
167
172
186
153
152
152
151
154
177
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
Mo/L
0.040
0.030
0.040
0.050
0.120
0.070
0.030
0.020
0.040
0.030
0.280
0.040
0.030
0.030
0.030
C.050
0.880
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.400
0.400
0.400
0.400
0.600
1.300
0.500
0.500
0.500
0.500
0.700
0.500
0.300
0.300
0.400
0.300
1.300
00630
N02&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.050
0.070
0.030
0.020
0.070
0.210
0.170
0.050
0.040
0.040
0.040
0.040
0.020K
00671
PHOS-UIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.008
0.008
O.OOS
0.007
0.009
0.009
0.005
0.004
0.006
0.007
0.015
0.013
0.012
0.011
0.010
0.008
U.U22
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS ThflN INDICATED
-------
RETklEVAL DAVE 77/03/24
DATE
FROM
TO
74/03/30
74/06/12
74/10/23
00665 32217 00031
TIME DEPTH PHOS-TOT CHLRPnYL INCOT LT
OF A HEMNING
OAY FEET
11
11
11
11
11
10
10
10
10
10
10
1
1
30
30
30
30
30
20
20
20
20
20
20
05
OS
05
05
05
05
05
05
0000
0005
0015
0040
0080
0000
0005
0020
0040
0060
0080
0000
0001
0005
0013
001S
0035
0055
0078
MG/L P
0
0
0
0
0
f.
0
1)
0
0
0
0
l!
0
o
•j
(••
.012
.013
.015
.015
.01*
.029
.013
.020
.014
.013
.025
.022
.020
.020
.02^
.023
.073
UG/L PERCENT
10.2
2.4
1 .0
7.7
50.0
1.0
400201
34 25 52.0 097 01 34.0 3
ArtBl"~i<;LE LAKE
40099 OKLAHOMA
101491
11EPALES 04001002
0088 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE V7/03/24
/TYPA/AM8NT/LAKE
DATE
FROM
TO
74/03/30
74/06/12
74/10/23
TIME
OF
DAY
11 50
11 50
11 50
11 50
13 10
13 10
13 10
13 10
13 10
12 10
12 10
12 10
12 10
DEPTH
FEET
0000
0005
0015
0025
0000
OOOb
0015
0022
0028
0000
0005
0015
0026
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
15.1
13.3
12.7
11.8
27.7
27.7
?5.4
24.9
24.1
19.0
19.0
19.0
18.7
00300 00077 00094
DO TRANSP CNDUCTVt
SECCHI FIELD
MG/L INCHES
9.8
9.4
9.0
8.0
8.4
4.4
2.2
1.0
9.2
8.8
fl.4
8.6
32
36
58
405
332
332
330
492
492
502
463
523
381
379
381
409
400202
34 27 58.0 097 00 51.0 3
AR6UCKLE LAKE
4009V OKLAHOMA
101491
11EPALES
0030
00400
FH
SU
8.20
8.20
8.20
8.10
8.60
8.70
8. 50
8.<*C
8.30
8.27
8.25
8.23
8.25
0*001002
FEET DEPTH CLASS
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
185
166
164
166
165
167
167
179
188
152
150
154
158
00610
NH3-M
TOTAL
MG/L
0.040
0.040
0.040
0.040
0.060
0.020
0.040
O.OtoO
0.100
0.020K
0.020
0.020K
0.020K
00
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
1.000
0.400
0.300
0.400
0.600
0.400
0.500
0.400
0.500
00630
N02&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.020
0.020
0.030
0.040
0.050
0.020K
0.020K
0.020K
0.020K
00671
PHOS-D1S
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.007
0.012
0.009
0.008
0.009
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.009
0.010
0.010
0.009
K VALUE KNOWN 70 BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 77/03/24
/TYPA/AMbNT/LAKE
00665 32217
DATE TIME DEPTH PHOS-TOT CHLPPhYL
FROM OF A
TO DAY FEET MG/L P UG/L
74/03/30 11 50 0000 0.019 11.5
11 50 0005 0.017
11 50 0015 0.016
11 50 0025 0.018
74/06/12 13 10 0000 0.027 3.7
13 10 0005 0.023
13 10 0009
13 10 0015 n.026
13 10 0022 0.022
13 10 0028 0.045
74/10/23 12 10 0000 0.021 9.2
12 10 0005 1.037
12 10 0013
12 10 OOlb 0.02S
12 10 002b 0.026
00031
INCOT LT
REMMING
PERCENT
1.0
1.0
400202
34 27 58.0 097 00 51.0 3
A*BI :KLE LAKE
40099 OKLAHOMA
101491
11EPALES 04001002
0030 FEET OEPTH CLASS 00
-------
STO«ET RETRIEVAL UATt! 77/03/24
/TYPA/AM6NT/HKE
400203
34 27 52.0 097 02 26.0 3
ARBUlCKLE LAKE
4009* OKLAHOMA
101491
11EPALES 04001002
0024 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
DATE
FROM
TO
73/03/30
74/03/30
74/06/12
74/10/23
00010
TIME DEPTH WATER
OF TEMP
DAY FEET
12
12
1?
12
12
12
1?
12
10
10
10
10
1C
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
55
55
55
55
35
35
35
0000
0005
0015
0020
0000
OOT5
0015
0020
0000
OOOb
0015
0020
0000
0005
0018
CENT
13.
13.
11.
11.
26.
26.
25.
25.
18.
18.
18.
5
1
9
5
8
8
5
3
9
9
9
00300
DO
MG/L
9
9
9
7
7
5
5
8
8
8
.8
.2
.4
.6
.6
.8
.4
.6
.2
.4
00077 00094
T«ANSP CNDUCTVr
SECCHI FIELD
INCHES MICROMHO
36
50
00630 00671
N02fcN03 PHOS-DIS
N-TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L MG/L C
329
327
318
319
421
418
416
416
369
369
369
8.30
8.30
8.20
8. 1C
8.50
8.60
8.50
8.50
8.21
8.21
8.16
160
160
159
158
157
156
158
157
152
152
152
0.040
0.040
0.040
0.04C
0.040
0.020
0.020
0.030
0.040
0.210
0.020
0.300
0.400
0.300
0.300
1.000
0.500
0.500
0.600 .
0.500
0.300
0.200
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.040
0.020
0.020
0.030
0.020
0.020
0.030
0.007
0.009
0.008
0.008
0.006
0.005
0.005
0.007
0.008
0.009
0.014
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL OATE 7//03/i:4
00665
DATE TIME DEPTH PHOS-TOT
FROM or
TO DAY FEET MG/L ?
0.021
0.036
0.017
U.017
0.017
0.017
0.016
0.017
0.029
0.024
0.029
73/03/30
74/03/30
74/U6/12
74/10/23
12
12
12
12
12
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
lu
10
10
10
10
10
10
55
c;5
55
<5<5
55
55
35
35
15
35
35
0000
0000
0005
0015
0020
0000
000?
0005
0011
0015
0020
0000
0001
0005
0010
0018
32217
ChLRPHYL
A
UG/L
12.5
2.3
9.1
0-5031
INCOT LT
PERCENT
^00203
34 27 52.0 097 02 26.0 3
ARBO"
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 77/03/24
/TYPA/AMBNT/LAKE
OATE
FROM
TO
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
74/06/12 13 40 0000
13 40 0005
13 40 0019
13 40 0030
13 40 0048
74/10/23 11 45 0000
11 45 0005
11 45 0015
11 45 0025
11 4^ 0036
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
27.0
26.6
25.6
25.1
lb.2
18.8
18.8
18.7
18.6
18.1
400204
34 25 33.0 096 59 57.0 3
A^BUrKLE LAKE
40 OKLAHOMA
101491
11EPALES
04001002
0053 FEET DEPTH CLASS
00300
DO
MG/L
8.4
8.4
7.0
5.4
0.8
7.2
7.0
7.2
6.8
7.4
00077
TRANSP
SECCHI
IMCHES
70
•
6d
00094
CNDUCTVY
FIELD
MICROMHO
428
425
420
420
390
371
371
371
371
409
00400
PH
SU
8.80
8.80
8.70
8.50
8.30
7.97
7.98
7.97
7.97
7.93
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
158
158
159
162
179
153
153
152
151
. 167
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.040
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.100
0.040
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.030
00
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.600
0.400
0.500
0.500
0.400
0.500
0.400
0.300
0.300
0.200
00630
N02t>N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.030
0.040
1 0.040
0.030
0.140
0.050
0.050
0.050
0.040
0.020
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.010
0.007
0.006
0.004
0.005
0.004
0.008
DATE
FROM
TO
74/06/12
74/10/23
00665 32217 00031
TIME D£PTH PHOS-TOT CHLRPHYL INCDT LT
OF A REMNING
DAY FEET
13
13
13
13
13
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
40
40
40
40
40
45
45
45
45
45
45
45
0000
0005
0019
0030
004S
0060
0001
0005
0011
0015
0025
0036
MG/L P
0
0
0
s
0
0
0
t"-
0
.017
.015
.016
.018
.029
.019
.018
.017
.021
.029
UG/L PERCENT
2.5
1.0
6.2
50.0
1.0
-------
APPENDIX D
TRIBUTARY DATA
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 77/03/24
/TYPA/AMBNT/STREAM
DATE TIME DEPTH N02S.N03
FROM OF
TO DAY FEET
74/11/25
74/12/10
75/01/27
75/02/11
75/03/13
75/04/09
75/05/03
75/05/18
75/06/11
75/07/18
75/08/08
75/09/08
75/10/20
11
09
11
13
10
10
15
15
10
14
14
13
10
30
30
00
00
40
30
30
05
?5
00
00
00
45
4002A1
34 25 43.0 097 02 12.0 4
kOCK CREEK
40 7.5 DOUGHERTY
0/ARBUCKLE RESERVOIR 101491
2NORY RD 8RDG 0.5 MI SW OF ARBUCKLE DAM
11EPALES 04001004
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
0630
I&N03
OTAL
IG/L
0.040
0.040
0.056
0.088
0.208
0.070
0.070
0.090
0.145
0.010
0.005
0.055
0.005
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
1.000
0.800
0.550
0.800
0.650
0.050
0.600
1.900
1.500
0.950
1.100
0.800
1.000
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
Mb/L
0.020
0.020
0.048
0.016
0.032
0.020
0.085
0.095
0.035
0.015
0.005
0.005K
0.005
00671
PHOS-OIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.010
0.005K
0.006
0.008K
J.016
0.005
0.010
0.012
0.010
0.005
0.005K
0.020
0.005
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.010
0.020
0.020
0.030
0.040
0.030
0.050
0.020
0.030
0.040
0.060
K VALUE KNOWN 10 Bt
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORE.! RETRIEVAL DATE 77/03/2'*
/TrPA/AMBNT/STRCAM
4002A2
34 29 10.0 096 59 07.0 4
ROCK CREEK
40 7.5 SULPHUK S
T/ARBUCKLE RESERVOIR 101491
BANK BELO SULPHER STP OUTFALL
11EPALES 04001004
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
DATE
FROM OF
TO OAY
TIME DEPTH
FEET
74/11/25
74/12/10
75/01/27
75/02/11
75/03/13
75/04/09
75/05/03
75/06/11
75/07/18
75/08/08
75/09/OH
75/10/20
13 00
13 00
13 30
10 no
11 30
10 on
16 15
12 05
15 00
15 00
14 00
12 45
00630
N025»N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.096
0.110
0.160
0.056
C.336
0.105
0.095
O.OdO
0.060
0.025
0.055
0.025
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.500
0.600
0.400
0.600
1.600
0.700
1.800
0.850
1.500
0.200
0.475
0.900
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.025
0.020
0.008
0.024
0.072
0.025
0.037
0.030
0.030
0.025
0.005K
0.025
00671
PhOS-OIS
ORTHO
MG/L P '
0.010
0.010
0.005
0.016
0.048
0.030
0.040
0.010
0.005
0.005
C.155
00665
PrlOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.010
0.020
0.010
0.060
0.100
0.080
0.160
0.040
0.030
0.030
0.425
0.170
K VALUE KNOWhj 10 BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 77/03/24
/TYPA/AMBNT/STREAM
DATE TIME DEPTH N02>,N03
FROM OF
TO DAY FEET
74/11/25
74/12/10
75/01/27
75/02/11
75/03/13
75/04/0"
75/05/03
75/06/11
75/07/18
75/08/08
75/09/08
75/10/20
13
13
14
18
11
12
16
1?
15
15
16
13
50
30
00
00
50
20
45
30
30
30
•
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 77/03/24
/TYr>A/AM6NI/ST»f AM
4002B1
34 30 55.0 097 02 00.0 4
GUV SANDY CREEK
40 7.5 DAVIS
T/ARBUCKLE RESERVOIR 101491
Ort HHY 7 dROG 4.5 MI W OF OAVIS
11EPALES 04001004
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
DATE
FROM
TO
74/11/25
74/12/10
75/01/27
75/02/1 1
75/03/13
75/04/09
75/05/03
75/05/18
75/06/1 1
75/07/18
75/OH/OH
75/09/0*
75/10/20
00630 00625
TIME DEPTH N02&M03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TOTAL N
DAY FEET
11
11
12
10
11
12
16
16
OP
U
14
13
13
51
45
50
30
15
00
30
30
15
30
45
30
00
MG/L
0
0
0
0
0
\J
0
0
0
0
u
n
0
.176
.08H
.088
. 104
.203
.065
.140
.620
.185
.020
.025
.065
.010
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
1.
1.
0.
2.
3.
3.
0.
0.
0.
1.
600
ROO
600
40C
400
950
600
400
400
550
500
500
000
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PhOS-UlS PHOS-10T
TOTAL ORTHO
MlVL
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
025
015
072
016
024
060
025
095
030
010
010
OC5K
025
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
p
040
020
008
016
032
025
045
060
025
010
025
035
020
MG/L P
0.040
0.050
0.020
0.050
0.110
0.190
0.210
U.260
0.050
0.030
0.120
0.060
0.050
K VALUE ivNOwN TO di
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 77/03/24
4002C1
34 25 35.0 096 57 03.0 4
bUCM-'ORNE CREEK
40 7.5 SULPHUR S
T/ARfJOCKLt RESERVOIR 101491
OK HWY 18 BRDG 6 MI S OF SULPHUR
/TYPA/AMdNT/ST^EAM
0063C 00625
DATE TIME DEPTH N02*»N03 TOT KJEL
FROM OF N-TuTAL N
TO
74/11/25
74/12/10
75/01/27
75/02/11
75/03/13
7S/04/OQ
75/05/03
75/05/18
75/06/11
75/08/08
75/09/06
75/10/20
DAY FLET
10
08
10
11
08
11
14
16
10
12
10
11
30
30
45
05
45
2b
45
50
10
35
to
45
MG/L
0
0
0
C
0
0
'j
0
C
0
v'
y
,44B
.520
.432
.336
.528
.HO
.315
.450
.360
.350
.3^0
.3*0
MG/L
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
2.
1.
0.
1.
1.
800
000
800
500
900
0^0
9?5
400
050
150
400
200
11EPALES
0000 FEET
0.1610 00671 00665
Nri )-N PHOS-OIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL OWTriO
MG/L
0.
C.
0.
0.
C.
0.
0.
6.
0.
n.
0.
0.
030
025
030
008K
024
025
045
025
040
015
010
020
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
u.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
p
005K
005K
004
008K
024
005K
045
030
015
010
025
010
MG/L P
0.010K
0.010K
0.023
0.020
0.100
0.210
0.480
0.040
0.020
0.040
0.020
DEPTH
04001004
CLASS 00
K VALUE KNOWN 7o t)£
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
APPENDIX E
PARAMETRIC RANKINGS OF LAKES
SAMPLED BY NES IN 1974
STATE OF OKLAHOMA
-------
r,;jA TO HE "SF.O IN R
LAKE
CODE
4001 ALTUS
40.)?. A»9"OLP LrtK,"
4003 LAKE ELl.Sv.OPfH
40n4 LA*f FHF A!l(_ A
ftOOS FORT
4t)U6 F'O^T
4007 FOSS P*M RESFkVOI
400* LAKE
4010 LAKE
4'Jll KEYSTONE
LAKE.
r(^
40
Tt'jOMM LAKE
vE:tIAN
TOTAl H>
0.1-*!
0 . A 2 n
0.037
n . nol
0 . r 3 ci
f i . n 7 o
f .127
0.142
U . n S9
ri . " 3 S
•j.ni .'
n . o H o
,). Anb
MEDIAN
INCMP N
0.060
0.07C
0.070
n. 405
0.110
ft. 135
0.090
1 .780
0 . 7 4 ij
0.250
0.690
0 . b a 0
0.550
0 . 1 S 0
0.230
0.160
500-
MEANi SEC
46H.625
«»43.6no
4S9.400
4«?.51 3
454.667
48S.167
463.857
4B4.333
468. HS7
461.000
484.303
483.000
*3S.500
4 6 -3. II (10
«*78.bOO
460.676 .
MEAN
OLO&A
14.750
7.0?7
H. .430
».3«3
14.967
9.733
4.66e:
7.973
6.76H
5.667
21.427
b.137
6.646
H.-»22
4.bl?
12..j2b
1S-
MIN OO
8.400
I4.t>00
9.400
14.200
8.400
7.600
8.400
8.200
14.800
9.000
14.^00
14.600
15.000
12.000
15.000
14.600
MEDIAE
uiss O«THO
0.010
11 . 0 0 H
0.009
0.0 ?9
0.01?
0.014
0.006
0.093
0.03R
0.0?6
0.096
0.031
0 . 0 1 6
0.009
0 . 0 1 f-
0.016
-------
PERCENT OF LA*E^ *1TH
LAKF
COOF ' LIKE
40"!
4002 A'->hi:C«LE
4001 LAKE F.LL
4004 L4- 14 TtXOl*A
MEniflN
TOTAL
«•••> (
100 (
HO (
20 (
?'» (
33 (
91 (
0 (
13 (
47 (
7 (
an (
67 (
87 (
ft (
!S1 I
P
9)
15)
12)
3)
1) )
;>)
14)
0)
2)
7)
1)
b)
10)
13)
4)
b)
MEDIAN
INORfi N
100
90.
90
33
73
67
80
0
7
40
13
20
?7
h>)
4 7
a 3
( 15)
( 13)
( 13)
( 5)
( 1 1 1
( 10)
( 12)
( 0)
( 1 )
( 6)
( 2)
( 3)
( 4)
( 9)
1 7)
( H)
SOO-
MEAN its- MEOUN
HEAN SEC
47 (
93 (
MO (
27 (
h7 (
0 (
60 (
7 (
40 (
b7 (
13 (
2fl (
100 (
S3 (
33 (
73 (
7)
14)
12)
4)
13)
0)
9)
1)
6)
10)
2)
3)
IS)
8)
5)
1 1 )
CriLORA
13 (
53 <
33 (
100 (
7 (
27 (
87 (
47 (
60 (
7.1 (
0 (
80 (
67 (
40 (
9j (
20 (
2)
M)
5)
15)
1)
M
11)
7)
9)
11)
0)
12)
10)
6)
14)
3)
MIN DO
80 (
33 (
60 I
47 (
rtO (
100 (
80 (
93 (
?0 (
67 (
13 (
33 (
3 (
53 (
3 (
33 (
11)
4)
9)
7)
111
15)
11)
14)
3)
10)
2)
4)
0)'
«)
0)
4)
DISS OP.THO P
73 (
93 (
H7 (
33 (
t>7 <
60 <
100 (
7 (
13 (
20 (
0 (
27 (
50 (
bd (
40 (
50 (
11)
14)
ID
S)
10)
9)
IS)
1)
?)
.1)
0)
4)
7)
1?)
M
7)
------- |