U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
WORKING PAPER SERIES
REPORT
ON
FORT SUPPLY RESERVOIR
WOODWARD COUNTY
OKLAHOW
EPA EGION VI
WORKING PAPER No, 586
CORVALLIS ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY - CORVALLIS, OREGON
and
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING & SUPPORT LABORATORY - LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
699-440
-------
REPORT
ON
FORT SUPPLY RESERVOIR
WOODWARD COUNTY
OKLAHOMA
EPA REGION VI
WORKING PAPER No, 586
WITH THE COOPERATION OF THE
OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF POLLUTION CONTROL
AND THE
OKLAHOMA NATIONAL GUARD
MARCH, 1977
-------
REPORT ON FORT SUPPLY RESERVOIR
WOODWARD COUNTY, OKLAHOMA
EPA REGION VI
by
National Eutrophication Survey
Water and Land Monitoring Branch
Monitoring Applications Laboratory
Environmental Monitoring & Support Laboratory
Las Vegas, Nevada
and
Eutrophication Survey Branch
Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory
Corvallis, Oregon
Working Paper No. 586
OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
March 1977
-------
CONTENTS
Page
Foreword i i
List of Oklahoma Study Lakes iv
Lake and Drainage Area Map v
Sections
I. Conclusions 1
II. Lake and Drainage Basin Characteristics 4
III. Lake Water Quality Summary 6
IV. Nutrient Loadings 11
V. Literature Reviewed 17
VI. Appendices 18
-------
ii
FOREWORD
The National Eutrophication Survey was Initiated in 1972 in
response to an Administration commitment to investigate the nation-
wide threat of accelerated eutrophication to freshwater lakes and
reservoirs.
OBJECTIVES
The Survey was designed to develop, in conjunction with state
environmental agencies, information on nutrient sources, concen-
trations, and impact on selected freshwater lakes as a basis for
formulating comprehensive and coordinated national, regional, and
state management practices relating to point source discharge
reduction and nonpoint source pollution abatement in lake water-
sheds.
ANALYTIC APPROACH
The mathematical and statistical procedures selected for the
Survey's eutrophication analysis are based on related concepts
that:
a. A generalized representation or model relating
sources, concentrations, and impacts can be
constructed.
b. By applying measurements of relevant parameters
associated with lake degradation, the generalized
model can be transformed into an operational
representation of a lake, its drainage basin, and
related nutrients.
c. With such a transformation, an assessment of the
potential for eutrophication control can be made.
LAKE ANALYSIS
In this report, the first stage of evaluation of lake and
watershed data collected from the study lake and its drainage .
basin is documented. The report is formatted to provide state
environmental agencies with specific information for basin
flanninq [§303(e)], water quality criteria/standards review
§303(c)], clean lakes [§314(a,b)], and water quality monitoring
[§106 and §305(b)] activities mandated by the Federal Water
Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972.
-------
Beyond the single lake analysis, broader based correlations
between nutrient concentrations (and loading) and trophic condition
are being made to advance the rationale and data base for refine-
ment of nutrient water quality criteria for the Nation's freshwater
lakes. Likewise, multivariate evaluations for the relationships
between land use, nutrient export, and trophic condition, by lake
class or use, are being developed to assist in the formulation of
planning guidelines and policies by the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency and to augment plans implementation by the states.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The staff of the National Eutrophication Survey (Office of
Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency)
expresses sincere appreciation to the Oklahoma Department of
Pollution Control for professional involvement, to the Oklahoma
National Guard for conducting the tributary sampling phase of the
Survey, and to those Oklahoma wastewater treatment plant operators
who provided effluent samples and flow data.
Dr. Denver Talley, Director, Oklahoma Department of Pollution
Control; the staff of the Oklahoma Water Resources Board; and the
staff of the Oklahoma State Department of Health reviewed the pre-
liminary reports and provided critiques most useful in the prepara-
tion of this Working Paper Series.
Major General John Coffey, Jr., the Adjutant General of
Oklahoma, and Project Officers Colonel Curtis W. Killigan and
Major James 0. Haney, Jr., who directed the volunteer efforts of
the Oklahoma National Guardsmen, are also gratefully acknowledged
for their assistance to the Survey.
-------
IV
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
STUDY LAKES
STATE OF OKLAHOMA
LAKE NAME
Altus Reservoir
Arbuckle Lake
Lake Elsworth
Lake Eufaula
Fort Cobb Reservoir
Fort Supply Reservoir
Foss Dam Reservoir
Lake Frances
Grand Lake 0' The Cherokees
Lake Hefner
Keystone Reservoir
Oologah Lake
Tenkiller Ferry Reservoir
Lake Thunderbird
Wister Reservoir
COUNTY
Greer, Kiowa
Murray
Caddo, Comanche
Haskell, Mclntosh,
Okmulgee, Pittsburg
Caddo
Woodward
Custer
Adair
Mayes, Delaware, Craig,
Ottowa
Oklahoma
Tulsa, Creek, Osage, Pawnee
Nowata, Rogers
Cherokee, Sequoyah
Cleveland
LeFlore
-------
FORT SUPPLY RESERVOIR
• Se.-iage Treatrent -acility
® Tributary Sampling Site
X Lake Sampling Site
^."i Drainage Area Boundary
~~ 10 20
30 Km.
5 10
Scale
!00'30'
lOO'OO'
99'30'
-------
REPORT ON FORT SUPPLY RESERVOIR, OKLAHOMA
STORET NO. 4006
I. CONCLUSIONS
A. Trophic Condition:*
On the basis of field observations and Survey data,
Fort Supply Reservoir is considered eutrophic, i.e., nutrient
rich and highly productive. Mhether such nutrient enrichment
is to be considered beneficial or deleterious is determined
by its actual or potential impact upon designated beneficial
water uses of each lake.
Chlorophyll a_ levels in Fort Supply Reservoir ranged from
2.8 yg/1 in the summer to 17.0 yg/1 in the spring, with a mean
of 9.7 yg/1. Potential for primary production, as measured by
algal assay control yield, was low. Of the 16 Oklahoma lakes
sampled in 1974, 5 had greater median total phosphorus, 10 had
greater median inorganic nitrogen, and 9 had greater median
orthophosphorus levels than Fort Supply Reservoir.
Field limnologists did not note any phytoplankton blooms
or widespread macrophytes. However, low light penetration
likely limits the productivity of this lake.
*See Appendix E.
-------
B. Rate-Limiting Nutrient:
The ratios of inorganic nitrogen to orthophosphorus (N/P)
suggest that nitrogen was the primary limiting nutrient on all
three sampling occasions.
C. Nutrient Controllability:
1. Point sources -
Point sources were estimated to contribute 29.5% of the
total phosphorus load to Fort Supply Reservoir during the sam-
pling year. The city of Gage contributed 18.4%, and the city
of Fargo contributed 11.1% of the total.
2
The calculated phosphorus annual loading of 0.44 g P/m /yr
is greater than Vollenweider's proposed "oligotrophic" loading
(1975) but less than his "eutrophic" loading for lakes with
such volume and retention time. Removal of phosphorus inputs
from the two known point sources would not reduce loading to
an "oligotrophic" level in the lake; however, it would further
reduce potential for the occurrence of nuisance conditions
since it appears that suspended material (as measured by Secchi
disc) might be limiting primary productivity in Fort Supply
Reservoir.
-------
2. Nonpoint sources -
The mean annual load from nonpoint sources, including
precipitation, accounted for 70.5% of the total reaching
Fort Supply Reservoir. Wolf Creek contributed 51.3%, and
ungaged tributaries were estimated to have contributed 4.5%.
-------
II. LAKE AND DRAINAGE BASIN CHARACTERISTICS
Lake and drainage basin characteristics are itemized below.
Lake surface area and mean depth were provided by the Oklahoma
Department of Pollution Control; maximum depth was provided by
the Oklahoma Water Resources Board. Tributary flow data were
provided by the Oklahoma District Office of the U.S. Geological
Survey (USGS). Outlet drainage area includes the lake surface
area. Mean hydraulic retention time was obtained by dividing
the lake volume by mean flow of the outlet. Precipitation values
are estimated by methods as outlined in National Eutrophication
Survey (NES) Working Paper No. 175. A table of metric/English
conversions is included as Appendix A.
A. Lake Morphometry:
/
1. Surface area: 7.61 km2,
2. Mean depth: 11.9 meters.
3. Maximum depth: 23.5 meters.
4. Volume: 90.559 x 106 m3.
5. Mean hydraulic retention time: 582 days (1.6 yrs).
-------
B. Tributary and Outlet;
(See Appendix B for flow data)
1. Tributaries -
Drainage Mean flow
Name area(km2) (m3/sec)
A-2 Wolf Creek 3,589.7 2,12
B-l Boggy Creek 138.6 0.09
D-l Unnamed Creek 23.6 0.02
E-l Eightmile Creek 33.9 0.02
Minor tributaries and
immediate drainage - 76.1 0.06
Totals 3,861.9 2.31
2. Outlet - A-l Wolf Creek 3,869.5 1.80
C. Precipitation:
1. Year of sampling: 58.7 cm,
2. Mean annual: 55.8 cm.
-------
III. LAKE WATER QUALITY SUMMARY
Fort Supply Reservoir was sampled three times during the open-
water season of 1974 by means of a pontoon-equipped Huey helicopter.
Each time, samples for physical and chemical parameters were col-
lected from two stations on the lake and from one or more depths
at each station (see map, page v). During each visit, depth-
integrated samples were collected from each station for chlorophyll
a^ analysis and phytoplankton identification and enumeration. During
the first and last visits, 18.9-liter depth-integrated samples were
composited for algal assays. Maximum depths sampled were 3.0 meters
at Station 01 and 1.5 meters at Station 02. For a more detailed
explanation of NES methods, see NES Working Paper No. 175.
The results obtained are presented in full in Appendix C and
are summarized in III-A for waters at the surface and at the maxi-
mum depth for each site. Results of the phytoplankton counts and
chlorophyll ^determinations are included in III-B. Results of
the limiting nutrient study are presented in III-C.
-------
FuPT SUPPLY RESEHVCI*
STOFET COOE 4006
( 3/29/74 )
PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL CHARACTEHISTICS
( 6/10/74 )
( 10/24/74 )
PA.A.ETEK
TEMPERATURE (DE5
O.-l.S * OEPTH
DISSOLVED OXYGEN
O.-l.S V, OtPTH
N*
CtNT)
3
2
2
CONDUCTIVITY HJMHOSI
O.-l ,5 M uEHTH 3
MAX DEPTH** 2
PH (STANDAKU UNI
O.-l. 5 M DEPTH
WAX DEPTH**
TOTAL ALKALINITY
O.-l. 5 M DEPTH
M.AX DEPTH**
TOTAL P (MG/L)
O.-l.S M DEPTH
WAX DEPTH**
DISSOLVED OwTHO
0.-l.r> M DEr-TH
l»Ax DEPTH**
O.-l. 5 v' otr-Tri
MA' DEPTH**
O.-l.S M OtPTn
MA* iil->Tn**
O.-l.S M OEi-fH
MAX DEPTH**
2
2
2
2
2
P (MG/L)
2
2
2
2
2
)
2
2
MAX
S»** = 2 DEPTH
•3AN6E *EOI«N (METERS) N*
11.1- 12.1
11.0- 12.1
10.0- 10.2
10.0- 10.2
767.- 802.
787.- 797.
8.4- 8.5
8.3- 8.4
1B3.- 187.
13-*.- 187.
0. 059-0. 074
0.037-0.074
0.014-0.019
0.011-0.019
O.OfcO-0.060
0.0*0-0. 060
0. 060-0. U70
O.QbO-0.070
G.^O-O.iSOO
0. 600-0. dOO
11.1
11. b
10.1
10.1
802.
792.
«?.5
8.4
185.
186.
0.066
0.065
0.016
O.Olb
0.060
0.050
0.065
0.060
U.70U
0.700
n.o-
0.0-
0.0-
0.0-
0.0-
o.o-
n.o-
0.0-
0.0-
0.0-
0.0-
0.0-
0.0-
0.0-
0.0-
0.0-
0.0-
0.0-
0.0-
0.0-
0.9
2.4
0.9
2.4
0.9
2.4
0.0
2.4
0.0
2.4
0.0
2.4
0.0
2.4
0.0
2.4
0.0 '
2.4
O.D
2.4
4
2
2
4
2
4
2
4
2
4
2
4
e
4
2
4
?
5000
rlANGE
20.0- 20.2
20.0- 20.2
7.2- 8.0
7.2- 7.6
108.- 109.
108.- 109.
8.3- 8.3
8.2- 8.3
185.- 188.
183.- 187.
0.056-0.073
0.012-0.019
0.013-0.018
0.040-0.090
0.040-0.060
0.070-0.220
0.070-0.110
0.500-1.100
0.500-0.600
fEOI AN
20.1
20.1
7.5
7.4
109.
109.
8.3
8.2
187.
185.
O.U68
0.079
0.014
0.015
0.045
0.050
0.09G
0.090
0.650
O.S50
MAX
DEPTH
HANGE
0.0-
1.5-
0.0-
1.5-
0.0-
1.5-
0.0-
1.5-
0.0-
1.5-
0.0-
1.5-
0.0-
1.5-
0.0-
1.5-
0.0-
1.5-
0.0-
1.5-
rtS)
1.5
3.0
1.5
3.0
1.5
3.0
1.5
3.0
1.5
3.0
1.5
3.0
1.5
3.0
1.5
3.0
1.5
3.0
1.5
3.0
N»
4
2
4
2
4
2
4
2
4
2
4
2
4
2
4
2
4
4
S*°*
PANGE
15.2- 15.3
IS. 2- 15.3
6.2- 9.0
6.8- 9.0
1005. -1007.
1005. -1007.
S.4- 8.5
8.4- 8.5
177.- 179.
17S.- 179.
0.066-0.074
0.0^2-0.074
0. 014-0. 01«
0.014-0.020
0.090-0.120
0.090-0.1 10
(1.040-0.040
0.030-0.040
0.600-0.700
0.600-0.600
= 2
MEDIAN
15.2
15.3
6.4
8.9
1006.
1006.
8.5
8.5
177.
177.
0.068
0.073
0.014
0.017
0.105
0.100
0.040
0.035
0.600
O.oOO
MAX
DEPTH
RANGE
(METERS)
0.0-
0.9-
0.0-
0.9-
0.0-
0.9-
0.0-
0.9-
0.0-
0.9-
0.0-
0.9-
0.0-
0.9-
0. )-
0.9-
0.0-
0.9-
0.0-
0.9-
1.5
2.7
1.5
2.7
1.5
2.7
1.5
2.7
l.s
2.7
1.5
2.7
1.5
2.7
1.5
2.7
1.5
2.7
1.5
2.7
SECO1
0.4- n. ;j
0."
0.3- O.b 0.4
0.3- 0.3 O.J
« '. = NU. Of
»« -iXlMUM UtPTh sAM^l.tO AT t6O '-ITt
600 ^, = rvjo. OF SPEb SAMPLtU ON T^I^ DATE
-------
8
B. Biological Characteristics:
1. Phytoplankton -
Sampling
Date
03/29/74
06/10/74
10/24/74
Dominant
Genera
1. Kirchneriella
2. Microcystis
3. Oocystis
4. Osciliatori a
5. Chroomonas
Other genera
Total
1. Oocystis
2. Chlamydomonas
3. Chroomonas
4. Stephanodiscus
5. Ankistrodesmus
Other genera
Total
1. Stephanodiscus
2. Microcystis
3. Chlamydomonas
4. Oocystis
5. Chroomonas
Other genera
Total
Algal
Units
per ml
3,098
634
493
422
352
1.197
6,196
682
243
195
195
146
243
1,704
557
381
352
352
264
588
2,494
-------
2. Chlorophyll a_ -
Sampling Station Chlorophyll a_
Date Number (yg/1)
03/29/74 01 13.0
02 17.0
06/10/74 01 4.3
02 2.8
10/24/74 01 10.3
02 10.5
-------
10
C. Limiting Nutrient Study:
1. Discussion -
Significant nutrient losses occurred in algal assay
samples prior to analysis. The assay results were there-
fore invalid and have not been included in this report.
The mean inorganic nitrogen to orthophosphorus (N/P)
ratios in the lake data were 7/1, 10/1, and 9/1, respec-
tively, in the spring, summer, and fall, suggesting
nitrogen limitation at those times (a mean N/P ratio of
14/1 or greater generally reflects phosphorus limitation)
-------
11
IV. NUTRIENT LOADINGS
(See Appendix D for data)
For the determination of nutrient loadings, the Oklahoma
National Guard collected monthly near-surface grab samples from
each of the tributary sites indicated on the map (page v), ex-
cept for the high runoff months of April and May when two samples
were collected. Sampling was begun in November 1974, and was
completed in October 1975,
Through an interagency agreement, stream flow estimates for
the year of sampling and a "normalized" or average year were pro-
vided by the Oklahoma District Office of the USGS for the tribu-
tary sites nearest the lake.
In this report, nutrient loads for sampled tributaries except
Boggy Creek, B-l, were determined by using a modification of a USGS
computer program for calculating stream loadings. Nutrient loads
indicated for tributaries are those measured minus known point
source loads, if any.
Nutrient loadings for Boggy Creek, B-l, and unsampled "minor
tributaries and immediate drainage" ("ZZ" of USGS) were estimated
by using the mean annual nutrient loads, in kg/km2/yr, in Unnamed
Creek and Eightmile Creek at Stations D-l and E-l, and multiplying
the means by the ZZ area in km2.
Nutrient loads for the Gage and Fargo wastewater treatment
plants were estimated at 1.134 kg P and 3.401 kg N/capita/yr.
-------
12
A. Waste Sources:
1. Known municipal -
Name
Gage
Fargo
Pop,*
Served
536
325
Treatment*
Stabilization
pond
Stabilization
pond
Mean Flow
(m3/d x 103)
0.203**
0.123**
Receiving
Water
Wolf Creek
Boggy Creek
2. Known industrial - None
*U.S.EPA, 1971, and/or plant operators,
**Estimated at 0.3785 nrYcapita/day.
-------
13
B. Annual Total Phosphorus Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
% of
Source kg P/yr total
a. Tributaries (nonpoint load) -
A-2 Wolf Creek 1,700 51.2
B-l Boggy Creek 275 8.3
D-l Unnamed Creek 25 0.7
E-l Eightmile Creek 50 1.5
b. Minor tributaries and immediate
drainage (nonpoint load) - 150 4.5
c. Known municipal STP's -
Gage 610 18.4
Fargo 370 11.1
d. Septic tanks* - 5 0.2
e. Known industrial - None
f. Direct precipitation** - 135 4.1
Totals 3,320 100.0
2. Output - A-l Wolf Creek 2,670
3. Net annual P accumulation - 650
*Estimate based on 10 lakeshore residences,
**Estimated (see NES Working Paper No. 175).
-------
14
C. Annual Total Nitrogen Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
% of
Source kg N/yr total
..--^ a. Tributaries (nonpoint load) -
A-2 Wolf Creek 32,510 62,0
B-l Boggy Creek 4,435 8.4
D-l Unnamed Creek 855 1.6
E-l Eightmile Creek 990 1.9
b. Minor tributaries and immediate
drainage (nonpoint load) - 2,435 4.6
c. Known municipal STP's -
Gage 1,825 3.5
Fargo 1,105 2.1
d. Septic tanks* - 105 0.2
e. Known industrial - None
f. Direct precipitation** - 8,215 15.7
Totals 52,475 100.0
2. Output - A-l Wolf Creek 60,715
3. Net annual N export*** - 8,240
*Estimate based on 10 lakeshore residences.
**Estimated (see NES Working Paper No. 175).
***Export due to unknown sources and/or sampling error.
-------
15
D. Mean Annual Nonpoint Nutrient Export by Subdrainage Area:
Tributary kg P/km?/yr kg N/km2/yr
Wolf Creek
Boggy Creek
Unnamed Creek
Eightmile Creek
E. Mean Nutrient Concentrations in Ungaged Streams:
1
2
1
2
9
32
36
29
Tributary
C-l Turkey Creek
G-l Twentymile Creek
Mean Total P
(mg/1)
0.077
0,092
Mean Total N
(mg/1)
1.736
1.071
-------
16
F. Yearly Loadings:
In the following table, the existing phosphorus annual load-
ing is compared to the relationship proposed by Vollenweider (1975),
Essentially, his "eutrophic"' loading is that at which the receiving
waters would become eutrophic or remain eutrophic; his "oligotrophic"
loading is that which would result in the receiving water remaining
oligotrophic or becoming oligotrophic if morphometry permitted. A
"mesotrophic" loading would be considered one between "eutrophic"
and "oligotrophic".
Note that Vollenweider's model may not be applicable to water
bodies with very short retention times or in which light penetration
is severely restricted from high concentrations of suspended solids
in the surface waters.
Total Yearly
Phosphorus Loading
(g/m?/yr)
Estimated loading for Fort Supply Reservoir 0.44
Vollenweider's Veutrophic" loading 0.54
Vollenweider's "oligotrophic" loading 0.27
-------
17
V. LITERATURE REVIEWED
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1971, "Inventory of Waste-
water Treatment Facilities". EPA Publication No. OWP-1, Vol. 6,
Office of Media Programs, Office of Water Programs, Washington,
D.C.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1975. National Eutro-
phication Survey Methods 1973-1976. Working Paper No. 175.
National Environmental Research Center, Las Vegas, Nevada,
and Pacific Northwest Environmental Research Laboratory,
Corvallis, Oregon.
Vollenweider, R. A. 1975. Input-Output Models With Special
Reference to the Phosphorus Loading Concept in Limnology.
Schweiz. Z. Hydrol. 37:53-84.
-------
18
VI. APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
CONVERSION FACTORS
-------
CONVERSION FACTORS
Hectares x 2.471 = acres
Kilometers x 0.6214 = miles
Meters x 3.281 = feet
Cubic meters x 8.107 x 10" = acre/feet
Square kilometers x 0.3861 - square miles
Cubic metors/sec x 35.315 = cubic feet/sec
Centimeters x 0.3937 = inches
Kilograms x 2.205 = pounds
Kilograms/square kilometer x 5.711 = Ibs/square mile
-------
APPENDIX B
TRIBUTARY FLOW DATA
-------
TRIBUTARY FLO* INFORMATION FOR OKLAHOMA
03/
-------
TRIBUTARY FLO*' INFORMATION FOR OKLAHOMA
03/25/7?
LAKE CODE 4906
FORT SUPPLY RES.
MEAN MONTHLY FLO«S AND UAILY FLOWS(CMS)
TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAR MEAN FLOW DAY
400661
4006D1
4006E1
4Q06ZZ
11
12
i
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
7"j
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
0.025
0.025
0.028
0.034
0.034
0.03*.
0.06?
0.037
0.011
0.008
0.003
O.OC8
0.004
0.004
0.005
0.006
0.006
0.00ft
0.011
0.006
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.006
0.006
0.007
0.008
0.009
0.008
0.016
0.009
0.003
0.002
y.ooi
o.ori
0.015
0.016
0.01B
0.020
0.021
0.021
C.038
0.023
0.006
O.OOS
U.Otl?
0.003
2
14
IB
IS
14
5
3
20
27
9
14
5
2
14
18
15
14
5
3
20
27
9
14
b
2
14
18
15
14
5
3
20
27
9
14
b
FLO* DAY
FLOW DAY
FLOW
0.057
0.283
0.227
0.311
0.453
0.142
0.142
0.042
0.011
0.003
0.0
0.008
0.0
0.006
0.006
0.042
0.020
0.020
0.025
0.006
0.003
0.0
0.283
0.0
0.011
0.020
0.014
0.0^5
0.025
0.011
0.099
0.017
0.017
0.003
0.0
0.006
19
18
19
18
19
1&
0.085
0.057
0.006
0.020
0.003
0.017
-------
APPENDIX C
PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL DATA
-------
STORE! riETRIEvAL DATE 77/03/2*
/TY'PA/AMBNT/LAKE
DATE
' FROM
TO
74/03/29
74/06/10
74/10/24
TI"E DEPTn
OF
DAY FEET
11 00 0000
11 00 0003
11 00 0008
10 55 0000
10 55 0005
10 55 0007
10 55 0010
10 IS 0000
10 IS 0005
1C 15 0009
00010
KATES
TE-MH
CENT
11.1
11.1
11.0
20.2
20.2
20.2
2C.2
15.3
15.3
15.3
00300
00
MG/L
1C.O
10.0
7.4
7.2
7.4
7.2
8.4
8.4
8.8
400601
36 33 00.0 099 34 10.0 4
FOKT SUPPLY
40153 OKLAHOMA
100891
11EPALES 0^001002
0012 FEET OEPTn CLASS 00
OC077
TRtNiSP
SECCHI
INCHES
OOC94
CNDUCTVY
FIELD
MICROMHO
00400
PH
SU
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
00630
N02«.N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
00671
PHOS-OIS
ORTrtU
MG/L P
20
12
12
802
8.50
183
0.060
0.600
0.060
0.014
797
108
108
106
1U6
1007
1007
1007
8.30
8.30
8.30
8.30
8.20
8.49
8.49
8.49
184
185
187
187
183
177
177
175
0.050
0.220
0.100
0.090
0.110
0.040
0.040
0.030
0.600
1.100
0.700
0.600
0.600
0.600
0.600
0.600
0.040
0.090
0.050
0.050
0.060
0.090
0.100
0.090
0.011
0.019
0.012
0.011
0.016
0.015
0.018
0.020
-------
STOSET RETRIEVAL OATL 77/03/24
/TYPA/AM6NT/LAKE
DATE
FRO"
TO
74/03/29
74/06/10
74/10/2^
OC665 32217 00031
TIMF OEPTH PHOS-TOT CHLRPriYL INCDT IT
OF A HEMMING
UAY FEET
11
11
10
10
10
1C
10
10
10
10
10
10
00
00
55
5S
55
55
55
55
15
15
15
15
0000
0008
0000
0001
0003
OOOS
0007
0010
0000
0003
0005
0009
MG/L P
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.059
.057
.073
.071
.074
.094
.066
.06b
.072
UG/L PERCENT
13.0
4.3
50.0
1.0
1C. 8
1.0
400601
36 33 00.0 099 3<* 10.0 4
FO^T SUP^_Y RESERVOIR
40153 OKLAHOMA
100891
lltPALES 04001002
0012 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 77/03/24
400603
36 31 00.° 099 34 15.0 3
FORT SUPPLY RESEHVUIR
*0153 OKLAHOMA
100891
/TYPA/AMBNT/L&KF
HC.PALES
041)01002
0004 FEET DEPTn CLASS
DATE
FROM
TO
74/03/29
74/06/ 10
74/10/24
DATE
FROM
TO
74/03/29
74/Ob/10
74/10/24
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
11 20 0000
11 40 0000
11 40 0005
10 30 0000
10 30 0003
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
1 ?0 0000
1 40 COOO
1 fcO OOC1
1 40 0003
1 40 0005
10 30 0000
10 30 0003
00010
wATEK
TEMP
CENT
12.1
20.0
20.0
15.2
IS. 2
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L °
0.074
'J.058
C.065
C .069
U.074
00300
00
MG/L
10.2
8.0
7.6
8.2
9.0
32217
CHLRPHYL
A .
UG/L
17.0
2.8
1C. 5
00077
TRANSP
SECCHl
INCHES
15
18
12
00031
INCDT LT
REMNING
PERCENT
50.0
1.0
1.0
00094
CNDUCTVY
FIELD
MICROMHO
787
109
109
1005
1005
00^00 00410
PH T ALK
CAC03
SU MG/L
8.45 187
8.30 188
8.30 187
8.45 177
8.43 179
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.070
0.080
0.070
0.040
0.040
00
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.800
0.600
0.500
0.700
0.600
00630
N02kN03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.060
0.040
0.040
0.120
0.110
00671
PHOS-OIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.019
0.015
0.013
0.014
0.014
-------
APPENDIX D
TRIBUTARY DATA
-------
STOKET RETRIEVAL QATE 77/03/24
/TfPA/AMdNT/STREAM
•+006A1
36 33 59.0 099 33 05.0 4
*Ol_F «ELK
40 7.5 FT SUPPLY
0/FT SUP°LY HESERvulK 100891
US ri«Y 270/183 9ROG 1.3 Ml E5E FT SUPPLY
llEDiLE5 . 04001004
0000 FEET DEPTn CLASS 00
DATE
FROM
TO
74/11/02
74/12/14
75/01/18
75/02/15
75/03/14
75/04/05
75/04/19
75/05/03
75/05/1"
75/06/20
75/07/27
75/Cb/09
75/09/14
75/10/05
00630 00625
TIME DEPTn N02&N03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TOTAL N
DAY FEET
13
11
10
14
10
09
09
09
11
09
08
10
09
09
10
?9
00
00
07
45
20
50
?2
?5
35
05
15
44
Mu/L
0
0
0
•0
0
u
0
0
0
0
II
0
r.
.016
.072
.016
.016
.005
.010
.030
.025
.015
.005
.005
.005
.005
MG/L
0.
1.
1.
0.
1.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
900
200
300
700
200
550
000
150
550
800
650
650
SCO
450
00610 OC671 00665
NH3-M PnOS-DIS PnOb-TOT
TOTAL OP.THG
MG/L
0
0
\J
t\
0
-------
STOKt-T nETSIEYAL OATE 77/03/2n
AM
400oA2
36 23 58.0 099 37 22.0 4
•IdLr CREfcrs
40 7.5 FARGU
T/FT iliPPLY ^ESE*VOIK 100691
2NO^r HO oWOG 1.7 Ml N OK FARGO
llEPALtS 04001004
0000 KEET DE°Tn CLASS 00
DATE
TO
74/1 1/02
74/12/14
75/0 I/ in
75/02/15
75/03/14
75/04/05
75/04/ 19
75/05/03
75/05/1H
75/06/20
75/07/27
75/08/09
75/09/14
75/10/05
TIME GEPTh
OF
DAY FEET
09
11
11
14
11
10
10
10
10
10
09
10
10
1C
15
3^
15
45
0^
?0
00
35
44
15
jq
45
12
15
OG63U 00625
i N02&N03 TOT KJF.L
N- TOTAL N
MG/L
0
0
j
j
0
0
r
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.12S
.192
.288
.227
.120
.110
.100
.055
.020
.135
.095
.085
.525
.490
MG/L
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
c
0
1
.300
.600
.500
.500
.400
.300
.300
.450
.700
.403
.2jO
.450
.650
.400
"•610
l3-M
TiL
,,;/L
0.020
0.030
0.008
0.018
0.008
fl.050
0.015
C.020
3.015
0.020
G.015
0.020
0.040
0.040
00671
PnOS-OIS
OrniG
MG/L P
0.005
0.005
0.012
C.010
0.006K
0.005K
0.005K.
0.005
0.015
0.010
0.015
0.007
C.040
0.010
00665
PnOS-TOT
KG/L P
0.020
0.020
0.020
0.030
0.050
O.UlOK
0.020
0.0 70
0.090
0.040
0.030
0.030
0.067
0.030
K VALUE
LLSS THAN
-------
5TORET RETRIEVAL JATE 77/03/24
/TY°A/AMdNT/STREAM
DATE TIME DEPTi N02
FROM OF
TO DAY FEET
74/11/02
74/12/14
75/01/18
75/02/15
75/03/14
75/04/05
75/04/19
75/05/03
75/05/18
75/06/20
75/07/27
75/00/09
75/09/14
75/10/05
09 05
11 15
11 15
14 48
11 00
10 ?5
10 03
10 38
10 35
10 ?0
09 ?0
10 50
09 15
10 ?1
10 28
400681
36 23 53.^ 099 37 22.0 4
dOGGY CHEEK
40 7.5 FAKGO
T/FT SUPPLY RESEKVOIK 100691
2NORY RO BRDG 1.6 MI N Or FARGO 6ELO SfP
11EPALES 0400100t
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
0630
!«.N03
OTAL
IG/L
0.552
1.2tO
1.320
1.100
1.010
0.820
C.525
0.570
0.460
0.550
0.310
0.43.0
C.060
0.370
0.480
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.850
0.600
1.000
0.300
1.000
1.000
0.950
1.200
0.600
0.500
0.700
0.650
1.300
0.700
2.600
00610
NM3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.0?5
0.015
0.024
0.032
o.ooe
0.025
C.020
0.085
0.045
0.025
0.025
0.035
0.060
0.040
0.035
00671
PhOS-OIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.010
0.005K
0.019
o.ooaK
0.006K
0.005
0.010
0.020
0.040
0.035
0.050
0.070
0.045
0.050
0.035
0066S
PriOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.020
0.010K
0.03C
0.020
0.030
0.060
0.030
0.050
0.070
0.090
0.110
0.080
0.110
0.050
0.180
K tfttLUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 77/03/24
/Ty"A/AMbNT/STREAM
400662
36 23 34.0 099 37 04.0 4
bOGGY CSEEK
40 7.5 FARGO
T/FT SUPPLY RESE^VOIK 100891
OK rtWY 15 8»DG AdGV FARGO 5TP
11EPALES 0-+001004
0000 FEET DEHTn CLASS 00
DATE
FRO"
TO
7 "./I 1/02
74/12/14
75/01/13
75/02/15
75/03/14
75/04/05
75/04/ 19
75/05/03
75/05/18
75/06/20
75/07/27
75/08/09
75/09/14
75/1C/05
00630 00625
TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJ£L
OF N-TOTAL N
DAY FEET
08
12
11
15
11
10
10
10
09
11
OQ
11
10
11
40
06
5?
?0
35
30
38
45
44
20
45
45
58
OS
MG/L
0
1
1
1
1
A
t/
0
0
u
0
0
0
0
0
.920
.480
.t40
.300
.060
.910
.630
.680
.480
.640
.280
.2*0
.510
.730
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
400
600
600
700
500
350
450
tOO
?00
475
600
650
soo
900
0?610 OC671 00665
NH3-N PnOS-OIS PriOS-TOT
TOTAL OPTrtO
MG/L
0
c
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.010
.OtO
.040
.016
.006
.060
.015
.065
.070
.C20
.030
.050
.020
.030
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
p
025
005K
008K
008K
005
005K
015
035
030
030
025
045
010
MG/L P
0.025
0.010K
0.010K
- 0.010K
0.110
0.070
0.020
0.050
0.060
o.oao
0.090
0.080
0.060
0.050
N VALUE
-------
S10P.ET RETRIEVAL DATE 77/OJ/c4
<»006C1
36 23 58.0 099 34 24.0
<»0 7.5 FAwGO
T/FT SUPPLY RESERVOIR 100891
OK h«r 15 SHOO 3 Ml N£ OF FARCO
11EPALES C-+001004
0000 FEET OEPTn CLASS 00
DATE
FROM
TO
74/11/02
74/12/14
75/01/18
75/02/15
75/03/15
75/04/05
75/04/19
75/05/03
75/05/1H
75/06/20
75/07/27
T IUE L
OF
DAY F
12 45
12 ?0
15 30
11 43
10 36
10 50
10s55
09 40
09 55
09 55
FEET
•00630
N02t.NU3
N-TOTAL
MG/L
C. 166
1.320
2.640
1.050
2.000
1.500
1.300
0.630
0.170
0.150
•j.315
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.500
0.600
0.400
1.000
1.300
0.550
1.100
0.500
0.800
0.500
0.550
01610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.040
O.U45
0.052
0.024
0.032
0.115
0.055
0.055
0.065
0.030
0.020
00671
PnOS-OIS
UPTHO
MG/L P
0.060
0.015
0.015
0.008
0.016
0.030
0.025
0.025
0.055
0.110
0.025
006ba
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.080
0.040
0.015
0.040
0.140
0.130
0.050
0.070
0.070
0.120
0.090
-------
STOPET -<£T*IEV&L GATE 77/03/24
/TrPA/A«dNT/ST«fAM
400601
36 2i 08.0 099 37 12.0 4
UNNAMED C-rEEK
uO 7.5 FA3GU
T/FT SUPPLY ^ESEr
-------
STORET -.ML)*Y -3D A ING 7.5 MI N OF FARGO
11EPALES 04001004
0000 FEET OEPTn CLASS 00
DATE
FKOM
00630 00625
TI"E GE = T<-i N02iN03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TOTAL fc
TJ DAY FEET
74/1 1/02
74/12/14
75/01/18
75/02/15
75/03/14
75/04/05
75/04/19
75/05/03
75/C5/18
75/06/20
75/07/27
75/09/09
75/10/05
19
12
11
14
10
10
09
10
10
09
09
10
10
15
00
?5
30
55
07
45
15
55
55
05
30
05
MG/L
0
0
V
0
0
r
a
c
0
0
0
3
0
.352
.7b8
.736
.640
.570
.350
.195
.135
.620
.095
.210
.020
,<*60
MG/L
0.
0.
1.
0.
1.
0.
1.
1.
0.
0.
0.
1.
2.
800
900
400
600
3CO
500
100
150
850
950
800
250
400
00610
TOTAL
MG/L
0.
0.
•n.
0.
0.
:>.
•J *
0.
0.
0.
0.
a.
0.
075
100
224
080
040
175
lib
040
155
030
065
0«0
060
00671 00665
'nOS-OIb PrOS-TOT
UPTHO
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
G.
0.
0.
0.
3.
0.
p
020
010
020
008K
OOKK
010
010
010
075
015
015
020
015
MG/L f>
0.050
0.030
0.050
0.040
0.080
0.070
0.160
0.100
0.110
0.060
0.130
0.100
K VALUE iv-iOWN TC b£
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STOSET RETRIEVAL DATE 77/03/24
GATE TIME DEPTn N02«>N03
FrtOM OF
TO DAY FEET
74/11/02
74/12/14
75/01/18
75/02/15
75/03/15
75/04/05
75/04/19
75/05/03
75/05/18
75/06/20
75/07/27
75/08/09
75/09/14
11 30
11 45
10 10
14 00
10 45
10 00
09 35
10 00
10 04
11 25
09 35
11 00
10 4T
4006131
36 21 30.0 099 46 10.0 4
40 ELLIS CO r,*Y MAP
T/FT SUPPLY RESE^vOIk 100691
OK HfcY 46 B3DG 3 Ml N OF GAGE
11EPALES 04001004
0000 FEET OEPTrt CLASS 00
0630
'«>N03
OTAL
G/L
0.064
0.280
0.1 d4
0.160
0.185
0.290
0.035
0.050
0.500
0.025
0.240
0.250
0.590
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.300
1.900
1.100
0.500
0.500
1.100
0.650
0.525
O.P.OO
0.750
0.500
0.650
i.aoo
01610
Nnj-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.035
0.040
0.040
0.032
0.016
0.250
0.045
0.050
0.135
C.04C
0.037
0.055
0.145
C0671
PrlOS-OIS
OiUHO
MG/L P
0.045
0.010
0.008
0.008
0.015
C.020
0.015
0.080
0.060
0.035
0.025
0.230
00665
PnOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.050
0.030
0.020
0.040
o.oeo
0.060
0.115
0.130
0.100
0.100
0.080
0.300
-------
APPENDIX E
PARAMETRIC RANKINGS OF LAKES
SAMPLED BY NES IN 1974
STATE OF OKLAHOMA
-------
*• 0 'J i a L T I .• r --;
4 0 "> ' 1 - - • C - I T i.
" C '> * L i *' t
i-nsT C0«t> Rcc-E~ / j H
400b F04T
4007 FOSC Oat-'
400ft l_A«f. FRflMCE.-i
<«004 G^&riQ Lpl4Y'
'•' £ r' I £ N
T '1 T 1 1 I-1
••..1-1
". . •" 2 0
'•.o., 7
•' . i - 1
M.O jfi
0.070
o.rv?
n. 142
o.«rt7
rt .057
0. 1 .36
'l.Obv
'.'..134
'" . o c 7
n . i H o
!l.0*=,
•*E.DI 6N
I MO JC, fj
i", . 0 6 1 ;
0.07 n
0.070
f> . 4 •"! -i
0.110
0.135
0.090
1.7bfl
0.740
0.25U
0.6^1)
u.bflO
O.S50
'j . 1 b 'i
(i . ? 3 0
0.16 0
SOO-
•'Firj SEC
-6^.6^^
4 4 3 . fi 0 0
4 S -- . 4 0 0
432.513
<*54.6b7
485.167
463.657
494.333
468. 8b7
461 .000
»H4.303
483.000
43S.SOO
46S.001)
4 7 K . 5 (i U
4 6 f i . ri 7 b
MEftN
C-iLO-t
l».75o
7.027
<3 . 4 3 0
4.3HJ
14.967
9.733
4.rt6?
7.473
b.76fe
5.667
21.427
S.137
6.64^
^.^2?:
4.812
12.323
v
B
1*
9
14
8
7
8
fl
14
9
1.4
14
15
12
15
14
1S-
If. 00
.400
.60!)
.400
.200
.400
.eoo
.400
.2on
.800
.000
.900
.600
.000
.oon
.oon
.600
MEDIAN
01 SS CHTHO o
0.010
0.00*
0.004
0.0^9
0.012
0.014
0.006
. 0.0°3
U.03W
0.036
0.096
0.031
0 .016
U . 0 (J 4
0.016
0.016
-------
OF LA"ES «IT-« - :i£j VtlUtS
OF LAK.FS
VALUES)
LAKE
CODE LAKE
400^
4003
4004 LAKE EUFAULA
4006
4007
400*
4014
4010
4011
*0 le;
4013
4014
401S
FORT SUPPLY nFS-i-.
FOSS OAM RESERV-i!-
LAKE FRANCES
GRAND LAKE <)• Tn*
LAKE HEFNEr*
KEY5TONF PESEKVOI
OOLOGAH LAKE
TENKILLER FEPRY -i
LAKE THUNOE«UII.->O
WTSTEw
TEXUMA
TOTAL H>
<.-> I ,>
inn ( IT)
>-n ( 12)
2" ( 3)
I* i 11)
33 ( 5)
93 ( 14)
1 ( 0)
131 2)
•»7 < 7)
7 ( 1)
•»n t H)
67 ( in>
67 ( 13)
c 7 ( 4 )
D^ ( 8)
INOPG N
ion
*0
<50
33
73
67
80
0
7
40
13
20
27
6lJ
47
S3
( 15)
( 13)
( 13)
( b)
( 11)
( 10)
( 12)
( 0)
( 1)
( 6)
( 2)
( 3)
( 4)
( 9)
( 7)
( 8)
C00-
MEAN SEC
,7 (
*3 (
^n <
?7 (
H7 (
0 (
60 (
7 (
40 (
67 (
13 (
zn (
100 (
Hit (
33 (
73 (
7)
1-)
12)
4)
13)
0)
9)
1)
6)
10)
2)
3)
15)
8)
b)
11)
CHLOkA
13
53
33
100
7
27
87
47
60
73
0
BO
67
40
93
?0
( 2)
( 8)
( ••> )
( 15)
( 1)
( 4)
( 13)
( 7)
( 9)
( 11)
( 0)
( 12)
( 10)
( 6)
( 14)
( 3)
15-
MIN no
80 (
33 (
60 (
47 (
60 (
100 (
80 (
93 (
20 (
67 (
13 (
33 (
3 (
53 (
3 (
33 (
11)
4)
1)
7)
11)
IS)
11)
14)
3)
10)
?>
4)
0)
8)
0)
4)
OISS OPT«0 P
73 (
W 1 (
«7 (
33 (
17 (
60 (
100 (
7 (
13 (
20 (
0 (
?7 (
bO (
HO (
40 (
50 (
1 ) >
14)
n»
"1
in)
Q)
IS)
1 )
?)
3)
n,
4)
7)
13)
«,)
7)
------- |