U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
WORKING PAPER SERIES
REPORT
ON
KEYSTONE RESERVOIR
TULSA, OSAGE, CREEK AND
PAWNE COUNTIES
OKUMflA
EPA REGION VI
WORKING PAPER No, 591
CORVALLIS ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY - CORVALLIS, OREGON
and
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING & SUPPORT LABORATORY - LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
•&G.P.O. 699-440
-------
REPORT
ON
KEYSTONE RESERVOIR
TULSA, OSAGE, CREK AND
PAWNE COUNTIES
OKLAHOm
EPA REGION VI
WORKING PAPER No, 591
WITH THE COOPERATION OF THE
OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF POLLUTION CONTROL
AND THE
OKLAHOMA NATIONAL GUARD
MARCH, 1977
-------
REPORT ON KEYSTONE RESERVOIR
TULSA, OSAGE, CREEK AND PAWNEE COUNTIES, OKLAHOMA
EPA REGION VI
by
National Eutrophication Survey
Water and Land Monitoring Branch
Monitoring Applications Laboratory
Environmental Monitoring & Support Laboratory
Las Vegas, Nevada
and
Eutrophication Survey Branch
Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory
Corvallis, Oregon
Working Paper No. 591
OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
March 1977
-------
CONTENTS
Page
Foreword i i
List of Oklahoma Study Lakes iv
Lake and Drainage Area Map v
Sections
I. Conclusions 1
II. Lake and Drainage Basin Characteristics 4
III. Lake Water Quality Summary 6
IV. Nutrient Loadings 15
V. Literature Reviewed 22
VI. Appendices 23
-------
ii
FOREWORD
The National Eutrophicatlon Survey was Initiated in 1972 in
response to an Administration commitment to investigate the nation-
wide threat of accelerated eutrophication to freshwater lakes and
reservoirs.
OBJECTIVES
The Survey was designed to develop, in conjunction with state
environmental agencies, information on nutrient sources, concen-
trations, and impact on selected freshwater lakes as a basis for
formulating comprehensive and coordinated national, regional, and
state management practices relating to point source discharge
reduction and nonpoint source pollution abatement in lake water-
sheds.
ANALYTIC APPROACH
The mathematical and statistical procedures selected for the
Survey's eutrophication analysis are based on related concepts
that:
a. A generalized representation or model relating
sources, concentrations, and impacts can be
constructed.
b. By applying measurements of relevant parameters
associated with lake degradation, the generalized
model can be transformed into an operational
representation of a lake, its drainage basin, and
related nutrients.
c. With such a transformation, an assessment of the
potential for eutrophication control can be made.
LAKE ANALYSIS
In this report, the first stage of evaluation of lake and
watershed data collected from the study lake and its drainage
basin is documented. The report is formatted to provide state
environmental agencies with specific information for basin
planning [§303(e)], water qualitv criteria/standards review
[§303(c)L clean lakes [§314(a,bj], and water quality monitoring
[§106 and §305(b)] activities mandated by the Federal Water
Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972.
-------
Beyond the single lake analysis, broader based correlations
between nutrient concentrations (and loading) and trophic condition
are being made to advance the rationale and data base for refine-
ment of nutrient water quality criteria for the Nation's freshwater
lakes. Likewise, multivariate evaluations for the relationships
between land use, nutrient export, and trophic condition, by lake
class or use, are being developed to assist in the formulation of
planning guidelines and policies by the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency and to augrrent plans implementation by the states.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The staff of the National Eutrophication Survey (Office of
Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency)
expresses sincere appreciation to the Oklahoma Department of
Pollution Control for professional involvement, to the Oklahorra
National Guard for conducting the tributary sampling phase of the
Survey, and to those Oklahoma wastewater treatment plant operators
who provided effluent samples and flow data.
Dr. Denver Talley, Director, Oklahoma Department of Pollution
Control; the staff of the Oklahoma Water Resources Board; and the
staff of the Oklahoma State Department of Health reviewed the pre-
liminary reports and provided critiques rrost useful in the prepara-
tion of this Working Paper Series.
Major General John Coffey, Jr., the Adjutant General of
Oklahoma, and Project Officers Colonel Curtis W. Milligan and
Major James 0. Haney, Jr., who directed the volunteer efforts of
the Oklahoma National Guardsmen, are also gratefully acknowledged
for their assistance to the Survey.
-------
IV
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
STUDY LAKES
STATE OF OKLAHOMA
LAKE NAME
Altus Reservoir
Arbuckle Lake
Lake Elsworth
Lake Eufaula
Fort Cobb Reservoir
Fort Supply Reservoir
Foss Dam Reservoir
Lake Frances
Grand Lake 0' The Cherokees
Lake Hefner
Keystone Reservoir
Oologah Lake
Tenkiller Ferry Reservoir
Lake Thunderbird
Wister Reservoir
COUNTY
Greer, Kiowa
Murray
Caddo, Comanche
Haskell, Mclntosh,
Okmulgee, Pittsburg
Caddo
Woodward
Custer
Adair
Mayes, Delaware, Craig,
Ottowa
Oklahoma
Tulsa, Creek, Osage, Pawnee
Nowata, Rogers
Cherokee, Sequoyah
Cleveland
LeFlore
-------
KEYSTONE RESERVOIR
& "r:5w;j'y 3e-:iif>g Site
X ^;
-------
REPORT ON KEYSTONE RESERVOIR, OKLAHOMA
STORET NO. 4011
I. CONCLUSIONS
A. Trophic Condition:*
On the basis of field observations and Survey data,
Keystone Reservoir is considered eutrophic, i.e., nutrient
rich and highly productive. Whether such nutrient enrich-
ment is to be considered beneficial or deleterious is
determined by its actual or potential impact upon designated
beneficial water uses of each lake.
Chlorophyll a^ values in the lake ranged from 0.3 ug/1
in June to 181.1 yg/1 in October, with a mean of 21.4 yg/1.
Potential primary productivity as measured by algal assay
control yield was extremely high, and Secchi disc visibility
was low. Of the 16 Oklahoma lakes (including Lake Texoma)
sampled in 1974, only 1 had higher median total phosphorus
levels, 2 had higher median inorganic nitrogen values and
none had higher median orthophosphorus levels than Keystone
Reservoir.
Survey limnologists did not observe any problem algal
blooms or aquatic macrophytes during their visits to the
lake. However, it was reported that the lake was highly
*See Appendix E.
-------
turbid, and the low Secchi disc readings (range of 0.03 to
0.9 meters) suggest that primary productivity may be light
limited in Keystone Reservoir.
B. Rate-Limiting Nutrient:
The algal assay results indicate that nitrogen was the
primary limiting nutrient in Keystone Reservoir at the times
of assay sample collections (04/03/74, 10/22/74). The lake
data also indicate that nitrogen could limit production during
all sampling times. However, low light penetration in most
reaches of the lake is probably a more important controlling
factor than the nutrient levels.
C. Nutrient Controllability:
1. Point sources -
The mean annual phosphorus load from point sources
identified within 40 stream-km (25 miles) of Keystone
Reservoir was estimated to be 1.3% of the total lake
phosphorus load. The city of Cushing contributed 0.5%
from two wastewater treatment plants, Cleveland contri-
buted 0.3%, and six other municipal plants contributed
a combined 0.5% of the total.
The present overall phosphorus loading rate of 16.48
2
g P/m /yr is about 12 times that proposed by Vollenweider
(1975) as "eutrophic11 for lakes v/ith such volume and
-------
hydraulic retention time. On the basis of Survey data it is
expected that the trophic condition of Keystone Reservoir will
continue to deteriorate if the present loading rate is main-
tained.
2. Nonpoint sources -
The mean annual phosphorus load not attributable to
nearby point sources was about 98.7% of the total reaching the
lake. The Arkansas River accounted for 75.7% of the total
phosphorus load, the Cimarron River 21.4%, and the ungaged
drainage areas were estimated to have contributed 1.4%.
Included in the Arkansas and Cimarron River loadings undoubt-
edly are discharges of nutrient rich domestic and industrial
wastes upstream from Keystone Reservoir which influence the
lake. Examination of land use practice and identification
of additional point sources may provide answers to further
nutrient reductions in Keystone Reservoir.
The nonpoint phosphorus exports of the tributaries to
2
Keystone Reservoir (Section IV-D) range from 4-11 kg P/km /yr.
These exports are quite comparable to the unimpacted
tributary exports of nearby Grand Lake o1 the Cherokees*
2
(range from 6-12 kg P/km /yr).
*See Working Paper No. 589, "Report on Grand Lake o1 the Cherokees",
-------
4
II. LAKE AND DRAINAGE BASIN CHARACTERISTICS
Lake and drainage basin characteristics are itemized below.
Lake surface area and mean depth were provided by the Oklahoma
Department of Pollution Control; maximum depth was provided by the
Oklahoma Water Resources Board.. Tributary flow data were provided
by the Oklahoma District Office of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS).
Outlet drainage area includes the lake surface area. Mean hydraulic
retention time was obtained by dividing the lake volume by mean
flow of the outlet. Precipitation values are estimated by methods
as outlined in National Eutrophication Survey (NES) Working Paper
No. 175. A table of metric/English conversions is included as
Appendix A.
A. Lake Morphometry:
2
1. Surface area: 106.43 km .
2. Mean depth: 7.7 meters.
3. Maximum depth: 22.2 meters.
4. Volume: 319.511 x 106 m3.
5. Mean hydraulic retention time: 55 days.
-------
B. Tributary and Outlet:
(See Appendix B for flow data)
1. Tributaries -
Drainage Mean flow
Name area(km^) (m-ysec)
A-2 Arkansas River 123,524.8 130.40
B-l Hell roaring Creek 27.7 0.08
D-l Cimarron River 34,900.2 34.37
E-l Lagoon Creek 123.3 0.45
Minor tributaries and
immediate drainage - 3,991.0 14.43
Totals 162,567.0 179.73
2. Outlet - A-l Arkansas River 162,673.4 173.81
C. Precipitation:
1. Year of sampling: 126.4 cm.
2. Mean annual: 91.6 cm.
-------
III. LAKE WATER QUALITY SUMMARY
Keystone Reservoir was sampled four times during the open-water
season of 1974 by means of a pontoon-equipped Huey helicopter.
Each time, samples for physical and chemical parameters were collected
from 11 stations on the lake* and from a number of depths at each
station (see map, page v). During each visit, depth-integrated
samples were collected from each station for chlorophyll a analysis
and phytoplankton identification and enumeration. During the first
and last visits, 18.9-liter depth-integrated samples were composited
for algal assays. Maximum depths (expressed in meters) sampled are
listed below:
Station Maximum
Number Depth
01 9.4
02 7.9
03 19.8
04 15.8
05 17.1
06 12.2
07 6.4
08 7.3
09 16.8
10 23.2
11 7.6
For a more detailed explanation of NES methods, see NES Working
Paper No. 175.
The results obtained are presented in full in Appendix C and
are summarized in III-A for waters at the surface and at the
*Stations 01, 02, and 07 were sampled only three times. At the
June sampling, Station 10 replaced Station 03, and Station 11
replaced Station 08.
-------
maximum depth for each site. Results of the phytoplankton counts
and chlorophyll a_ determinations are included in III-B. Results
of the limiting nutrient study are presented in III-C.
-------
KcYSfONt ^
STOPST CODt
N*
WANGE
4/ 2/7f )
MAX
>* = 9 DEPTH
WANGt
MEDIAN (METEK.S)
PHYSIC*!. ANO CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS
( 6/12/74 )
HANCSE
MAX
= 9 DEPTH
nAM&E
MEDIAN (METEP.S)
N*
( 10/23/74 )
MAX
500* = 9 DEPTH
WANGE
PANGE MEOIAN (METEPb)
'£. (LitiG Cb'NT)
O.-l.S tj DEPTH 18 11.4- 16.4
MAX DEPTH** 9 9.7. i,,.^
DISSOLVED OXYGEN IMG/LI
0.-1.5 " DEPTH 9 9.0- 9.8
MAX DEPTH** s> 7.8- 9.8
CONDUCTIVITY
0.-1.5 M DEPTH 18
MAX DEPTH** 9
PH (STANDARD UNlTa)
0.-1.1? M T.EPTH 18
MAX DEPTH** 9
TOTAL ALKALINITY
n.-1.5 ,v DEPTH IK
MAX DEPTH** 9
12.6 0.0- 1.5 18 23.4- 25.7 24.1
12.3 1.5- 19.8 9 ?2.2- 24.1 23.2
9.4 l.b- 1.5 si 4.6- 7.6 5.6
».8 1.5- 19.8 9 2.4- 6.0 4.4
415.-4580. 1103.
649.-3494. 1689.
7.7-
7.7-
8.3
8.3
96.- 266.
US.- 268.
0.0- 1.5 18 426.-1570. 766.
1.5- 19.8 9 431.-1556. 761.
7.9 0.0- 1.5 18 7.1- 8.6 6.2
8.0 1.5- 19.8 9 7.4- 8.3 B.I
123. 0.0- 1.5 18 74.- 117. 106.
151. 1.5- 19.8 9 83.- 131. 99.
0.0- 1.5 IH 16.1- 18.3 17.0 0.0- l.b
6.4- 23.2 9 15.4- 19.1 16.8 1.5- 19.8
1.5- 1.5 16 6.8- 12.0 8.5 0.0- 1.5
6.4- 23.2 9 0.4- 9.6 6.6 1.5- 19.8
0.0- 1.5 18 1034.-2973. 1381. 0.0- 1.5
6.4- 23.2 9 1387.-7211. 3005. 1.5- 19.d
0.0- 1.5 18 7.8- 8.9 6.3 0.0- 1.5
6.4- 23.2 9 7.5- 8.8 8.3 1.5- 19.8
0.0- 1.5 18 105.- 196. 109. 0.0- 1.5
6.4- 23.2 9 108.- 196. 157. 1.5- 19.H
TOTAL P (MG/L)
O.-l.S M DEPTH
MAX DEPTH**
18 0.093-0.850 0.129
9 0.086-0.8SO C
DISSOLVED OfiTHO P (MG/L)
0.-1.5 i"i UEPTH
MAX DE»TH**
N02+N03 (Mb/L)
0.-1.5 M DEPTH
MAX DEPTH**
AMMONIA (Mb/L)
O.-l.S M i>EPTH
MAX DEPTH**
KJtLOAHL N (M3/L)
C.-1.5 M HF.PTH
MAX DEPTH**
SECCHI
(KETEMS)
18 0.046-0.127 0.099
9 0.052-0.133 0.117
18 0.050-0.760 0.57U
9 0.050-0.770 0.570
Id O.OSO-0.190 0.120
9 0.060-0.180 0.120
18 0.600-1.800 0.700
9 0.600-1.000 0.600
9 0.1- 0.8 0.5
0.0- 1.5 18 0.129-0.314 0.197
1.5- 19.« 9 0.104-0.339 0.211
0.0- 1.5 18 0.076-0.140 0.128
1.5- 19.8 9 0.061-0.128 0.107
0.0- 1.5 18 0.400-0.640 0.780
1.5- 19.8 9 0.320-0.740 U.610
0,0- 1.5 1ft 0.040-0.210 U.080
1.5- 19.6 9 0.060-0.290 0.110
0.0- 1.5 IB 0.500-1.100 0.700
1.5- 19.8 9 0.400-1.000 0.600
O.U- 0.4 0.1
0.0- 1.5 18 0.070-0.474 0.119 0.0- 1.5
6.4- 23.2 9 0.074-0.463 0.178 1.5- 19.»
0.0- 1.5 IP 0.022-0.130 0.076 0.0- l.s
6.4- 23.2 9 0.024-0.13ft 0.117 1.5- 19.8
0.0- 1.5 18 0.020-0.670 0.350 0.0- 1.3
6.4- 23.2 9 0.020-0.450 0.240 1.5- 19.8
0.0- 1.5 IH 0.020-0.280 0.040 0.0- 1.5
b.4- 23.2 9 0.030-0.370 0.060 1.5- 19.8
0.0- 1.5 IH O.bOO-1.600 0.750 0.0- 1.5
6.4- 23.2 9 0.500-1.300 0.800 1.5- 14.8
0.2- 0.9 0.6
« N = NO. OF
«* MAXIMUM DEPTH SAMPLED AT EACH siTt
*«» S = NO. Of SITES SAMPLED ON TnlS DATE
-------
KEYSTONE RESEKVOI*
PTC9ET COOE 4011
PARAMETER
TEMPE»iTU»E (DEO CENT)
PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS
( 8/EN
0.-1.5 M DEPTH
MAX nEPTH«°
CONDUCTIVITY (KM
O.-l.S M DEPTH
MAX oePT*10*
PH (STANOAMO UNI
0.-1.5 M DEPTH
MAX DEPTH"'
TOTAL ALKALINITY
0.-1.5 M DEPTH
MAX OEPTH«»
TOTAL P (MG/L)
0.-1.5 M DEPTH
MAX DEPTH*0
DISSOLVED OftTHO
0.-1.5 M DEPTH
MAX OEPTH«»
NO?*NOJ (MG/L)
0.-1.5 M DEPTH
MAX OEPTH»°
AMMONIA (MG/L)
0.-1.5 M DEPTH
MAX DEPTH*"
KJELOAHL N (Mfj/L
O.-l.S M PEPTH
MAX DEPTH*0
6
6
(«G/L)
6
6
HOS)
6
6
rsi
6
6
(MG/L)
5
b
i'
5
P (MG/L)
5
5
b
5
5
6
)
S
5
24.0-
25.4-
4.2-
0.1-
27.0
28.5
6.2
6.4
1033. -1845.
1068. -3403.
n
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
u
0
7.8-
7.6-
111.-
116.-
.066-0
.139-0
.030-0
.077-0
.1/0-1
.050-1
.030-0
.070-0
.700-1
.600-1
8.2
7.9
133.
149.
.340
.417
.187
.159
.300
.350
.060
.220
.000
.200
26.6
26.3
4.7
0.3
1338.
1860.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7.9
7.6
128.
126.
.087
.?93
.038
.084
.25U
.590
.050
.100
.800
.800
0.
5.
0.
5.
0.
S.
0.
5.
0.
5.
0.
S.
0.
5.
0.
5.
0.
5.
0.
S.
0-
8-
0-
8-
0-
8-
0-
8-
0-
8-
0-
8-
0-
8-
0-
8-
0-
8-
0-
8-
0
18
0
16
0
Id
0
18
0
15
0
15
0
15
0
15
0
15
0
15
.0
.3
.0
.3
.0
.3
.0
.3
.0
.8
.0
.8
.0
.8
.0
.e
.0
.e
.0
.8
SECCH1 DISC
0.2- 0.9
O.b
» N = NO. OF SAMPLtS
»« MA/IMUM DE.HTH SAMPLED AT EACH SITE
«»« S = NO. OK SlltS SAMPLtO ON THIS DATE
-------
10
Biological Characteristics:
1. Phytoplankton -
Sampling
Date
04/02/74
06/12/74
08/29/74
10/23/74
Dominant
Genera
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Centric diatoms
Chroomonas
Chrysophytan cell
Ankistrodesmus
Nitzschia
Other genera
Total
Chroomonas
Cryptomonas
Cyclotella
Chlamydomonas
Skeletonema
Other genera
Total
Centric diatoms
Chrysophytan cell
Navicula
Chlamydomonas
Chroomonas
Other genera
Total
Skeletonema
Chlamydomonas
Cyclotella
Ankistrodesmus
Chrysophytan cell
Other genera
Total
Algal
Units
per ml
2,146
503
450
265
264
797
4,425
344
238
106
53
53
794
1,086
126
51
51
25
__JQ3_
1,642
4,551
3,519
2,874
461
295
1,234
12,934
-------
11
2. Chlorophyll
Sampling Station Chlorophyll
Date Number (yig/l )
04/02/74 01 8.2
02 23.7
03 3.2
04 11.5
05 11.0
06 3.1
07 58.2
08 71.1
09 6.8
10
11
06/12/74 01 1.6
02 1.9
03
04 1.6
05 0.3
06 1.5
07 2.5
08
09 0.3
10 0.4
11 4.4
-------
12
2. Chlorophyll a_ - (continued)
Sampling Station Chlorophyll a
Date Number (pg/1)
08/29/74 01
02
03
04 4.8
05 3.. 0
06 3.9
07
08 10.9
09 2.3
10 1.4
11
10/23/74 01 25.1
02 45.6
03
04 18.4
05 12.4
06 20.5
07 154.9
08
09 1.5
10 9.6
11 181.1
-------
13
C. Limiting Nutrient Study:
1. Autoclaved, filtered, and nutrient spiked
Spike (mg/1 )
a. 04/03/74
Control
0.05 P
0.05 P + 1.0 N
1.00 PI
Control
0.05 P
0.05 P + 1.0 N
1.00 N
Control
0.05 P
0.05 P + 1.0 N
1.00 N
b. 10/22/74
Control
0.05 P
0.05 P + 1.0 N
1.00 N
Ortho P Inorganic N
Cone. (mg/1) Cone. (mg/1)
(Stations 01-02)
0.030
0.080
0.080
0.030
(Stations 03-05)
0.090
0.140
0.140
0.090
(Stations 06-09)
0.100
0.150
0.150
0.100
(Stations 02, 06,
0.173
0.223
0.223
0.173
0.116
0.116
1.116
1.116
0.730
0.730
1.730
1.730
0.663
0.663
1.663
1.563
07, 11)
0.161
0.161
1.161
1.161
Maximum Yield
(mg/1-dry wt.)
17.9
17.6
27.6
17.6
16.6
19.5
31.2
26.1
17.2
19.7
33.8
23.8
4.9
4.8
25.2
24.3
-------
14
2. Discussion -
The control yields of the assay alga, Selenastrum capri-
cornutum, indicate that the potential primary productivity was
extremely high in Keystone Reservoir during the sampling year.
In the spring assays for Stations 03-09, and in the autumn assay,
the addition of nitrogen alone produced a significant increase in
yield over that of the control, indicating those samples were
nitrogen limited. However, the very modest control yield in the
autumn sample, relative to the high levels of macronutrients
available, suggest that an additional factor(s) complicates the
growth limitation picture. In the spring assay for Stations 01-02,
no increase in yield was observed with the addition of either phos-
phorus or nitrogen alone, but the simultaneous addition of both
nutrients produced a significant increase, suggesting col imitation
by the two nutrients.
The mean inorganic nitrogen to orthophosphorus (N/P) ratios
in the lake data were 7/1 or less on all sampling occasions,
further indicating primary limitation by nitrogen (a mean N/P ratio
of 14/1 or greater generally reflects phosphorus limitation).
Comparisons of light penetration values and corresponding chloro-
phyll a^ levels (positive relationship) strongly suggest that the
latter are controlled by, rather than control, the high turbidity
in this lake.
-------
15
IV. NUTRIENT LOADINGS
(See Appendix D for data)
For the determination of nutrient loadings, the Oklahoma
National Guard collected monthly near-surface grab samples from
each of the tributary sites indicated on the map (page v).
Sampling was begun in November 1974, and was completed in October
1975. -
Through an interagency agreement, stream flow estimates for
the year of sampling and a "normalized" or average year were pro-
vided by the Oklahoma District Office of the USGS for the tributary
sites nearest the lake.
In this report, nutrient loads for sampled tributaries were
determined by using a modification of a USGS computer program for
calculating stream loadings. Nutrient loads indicated for tribu-
taries are those measured minus known point source loads, if any.
Nutrient loadings for unsampled "minor tributaries and
immediate drainage" ("II" of USGS) were estimated by using the
mean annual nutrient loads, in kg/km^/year in Hell roaring Creek
and Lagoon Creek at Stations B-l and E-l and multiplying the means
by the II area in km^.
The operators of the Drumright and Gushing (south) wastewater
treatment plants provided monthly effluent samples and correspond-
ing flow data. Nutrient loads for the Gushing (north), Oilton,
Yale, Jennings, Mannford, Cleveland (2 plants) and Pawnee
-------
16
wastewater treatment plants were estimated at 1.134 kg P and
3.401 kg N/capita/year.
-------
17
A. Waste Sources:
1. Known municipal
Name
Drumright
Gushing
(south)
Gushing
(north)
Oil ton
Yale
Jennings
Mann ford
Cleveland
North
Cleveland
South
Pawnee
Pop.*
Served
3,000
7,000
4,175
1,260
1,300
338
1,000
3,000
1,000
2,500
Treatment*
Trickling
f i 1 ter
Trickling
filter
Trickling
f i 1 ter
Stabilization
pond
Stabilization
pond
Primary
septic
Stabilization
pond
Stabilization
pond
Stabilization
pond
Trickling
filter
Mean Flow
(m3/d x 103)
0.806
2.740
1 . 580**
0.477**
0.492**
0.128
0.378**
1.136**
0.378**
0.946**
Receiving
Water
Cimarron River
Cottonwood Creek/
Euchee Creek
Skull Creek
Cimarron River
Mud Creek/
Cimarron River
Horse Creek/
Keystone Reservoir
Salt Creek
Keystone Reservoir
Keystone Reservoir
Black Bear Creek
2. Known industrial -
Name
Dal ton
Precision
(Gushing)
Gushing Tank
Car
Product
Iron
foundry
Railroad
equipment
Treatment
?
?
Mean Flow
(m3/d x 103)
?
?
Receiving
Water
Eucha Creek
Skull Creek
*Provided by plant operators and/or U.S.EPA, 1971.
**Estimated at 0.3785 m3/capita/day.
-------
18
B. Annual Total Phosphorus Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
% of
Source kg P/yr total
a. Tributaries (nonpoint load) -
A-2 Arkansas River 1,327,465 75.7
B-l Hell roaring Creek 105 <0.1
D-l Cimarron River 376,715 21.5
E-l Lagoon Creek 980 <0.1
b. Minor tributaries and immediate
drainage (nonpoint load) 23,945 1.4
c. Known municipal STP's -
Drumright 2,670 0.1
Gushing (north) 4,735 0.3
Cushing (south) 3,565 0.2
Oil ton 1,430 0.1
Yale 1,475 0.1
Jennings 385 <0.1
Mannford 1,135 0.1
Cleveland North 3,400 0.2
Cleveland South 1,135 0.1
Pawnee 2,835 0.1
d. Septic tanks* - 10 <0.1
e. Known industrial -
Dalton Precision (Cushing) unknown
Cushing unknown
f. Direct precipitation** - 1,860 0.1
Totals 1,753,845 100.0
2. Output - A-l Arkansas River 785,740
3. Net annual P accumulation 958,105
*Estimate based on 34 lakeshore residences and 1 park.
**Estimated (see NES Working Paper No. 175).
-------
19
C. Annual Total Nitrogen Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
% of
Source kg N/yr total
a. Tributaries (nonpoint load) -
A-2 Arkansas River 11,314,805 79.2
B-l Hell roaring Creek 3,485 <0.1
D-l Cimarron River 2,205,805 15.4
E-l Lagoon Creek 19,510 0.1
b. Minor tributaries and immediate
drainage (nonpoint load) - 566,720 4.0
c. Known municipal STP's -
Drumright 5,390 <0.1
Cushing (north) 14,200 0.1
Gushing (south) 9,010 0.1
Oil ton 4,285 <0.1
Yale 4,420 <0.1
Jennings 1,150 <0.1
Mannford 3,400 <0.1
Cleveland North 10,205 0.1
Cleveland South 3,400 <0.1
Pawnee 8,500 0.1
d. Septic tanks* - 395 <0.1
e. Known industrial -
Dalton Precision (Cushing) unknown
Cushing Tank Car unknown
f. Direct precipitation** - 114,900 0.8
Totals 14,289,580 100.0
2. Outputs - A-l Arkansas River 8,746,810
3. Net annual N accumulation 5,542,770
*Estimated based on 34 lakeshore residences and 1 park.
**Estimated (see NES Working Paper No. 175).
-------
20
D-. Mean Annual Nonpoint Nutrient Export by Subdrainage Area:
Tributary kg P/km2/yr kg N/km2/yr
Arkansas River 11 92
He!Troaring Creek 4 126
Cimarron River 11 63
Lagoon Creek 8 158
E. Mean Nutrient Concentrations in Ungaged Streams:
Mean Total P Mean Total N
Tributary (mg/1) (mg/1)
C-l Ranch Creek 0.069 1.345
F-l Salt Creek 0.080 1.068
G-l Council Creek 0.071 1.182
H-l Tiger Creek 0.397 1.672
J-l Euchee Creek 0.160 1.253
K-l Skull Creek 0.142 8.059
Nutrient loadings for Tiger Creek (H-l), Euchee Creek (J-l),
and Skull Creek (K-l) are substantially higher than the other
tributaries leading to Keystone Reservoir, due to the impact of
municipal and industrial sewage treatment facilities in the towns
of Orumright and Gushing.
-------
21
F. Yearly Loadings:
In the following table, the existing phosphorus annual
loading is compared to the relationship proposed by Vollenweider
(1975). Essentiallly, his "eutrophic" loading is that at which
the receiving waters would become eutrophic or remain eutrophic;
his "oligotrophic" loading is that which would result in the
receiving water remaining oligotrophic or becoming oligotrophic
if morphometry permitted. A "mesotrophic" loading v/ould be
considered one between "eutrophic" and "oligotrophic".
Note that Vollenweider's model may not be applicable to
water bodies with very short retention times or in which light
penetration is severely restricted from high concentrations of
suspended solids in the surface waters.
Total Yearly
Phosphorus Loading
(g/m2/yr)
Estimated loading for Keystone Reservoir 16.48
Vollenweider's "eutrophic" loading 1.36
Vollenweider's "oligotrophic" loading 0.68
-------
22
V. LITERATURE REVIEWED
U.S.. Environmental Protection Agency.. 1971.. "Inventory of
Wastewater Treatment Facilities". EPA Publication No. OWP-1,
Volume 6. Office; of Media Programs,, Office o:f Water Programs,
Washington, D.C.
U.S. Environmenta.l Protection Agency.. 1975.. National Eutro-
ph.ication: Survey Methods: 1973-1976. Working Paper No. 175.
National Environmental Research Center, Las Vegas, Nevada,
and Pacific Northwest: Environmental Research Laboratory,
Corvallis.,. Oregon.
Vollenweider, R. A. 1975. Input-Output ModeTs With, Special
Reference to the Phosphorus* Loading Concept in Limnology.
Schweiz. Z. Hydro!. 37:53-84,
-------
23
VI. APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
CONVERSION FACTORS
-------
CONVERSION FACTORS
Hectares x 2.471 = acres
Kilometers x 0.6214 = miles
Meters x 3.281 - feet
-/!
Cubic meters x 8.107 x 10 - acre/feet
Square kilometers x 0.38G1 - square miles
Cubic meters/sec x 35.315 - cubic feet/sec
Centimeters x 0.3937 ~ inches
Kilograms x 2.205 - pounds
Kilograias/squdre kilometer x 5.711 - Ibs/square mile
-------
APPENDIX B
TRIBUTARY FLOW DATA
-------
FLOW INFORMATION ("OR
03/25/77
LAKE CODE
!\EYSTONE RES.
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA OF LAKE(SO KM) 162673.4
SUR-DRAINAGE
TRIBUTARY ARFAfSQ KM)
162673.4
12:3524.8
27.7
•3490 0.2
12'3.3
4097.4
JAN
FE3
MflK
APR
MA*
NORMALISED FLO*S(CM5)
JUN JUL AUG
OCT
NLW
JtC
•••IE AN
4011.A2
40.1 Id 1
401101
4011E1
4011ZZ
86.08
55.22
O..03<*
9.00
0.20
6.23
JTOTAL
SUM OF
77.59
68.24
tt.042
14.55
0.27
8.50
DRAINAGE
111.85
88.07
0.057
15..?fc
0.-37
11.61
AREA OF
224.55
180.10
O.C99
45.31
O.fc>2
19.54
LAKE =
SUB-DRAINAGE AREAS =
260.23
240.98
0.311
•91.46
1.47
•48.42
162673.
•162673.
339.52
246.36
0.147
77.59
'0.74
24.07
SUM
4
3
234.55 113.55
•187,. 74 113.27
0*076 O.OJl
•38.51 20.95
0.40 0.16
'12.74 5.10
204.16
113.55
0.07&
32.85
0.34
11.33
MARY
'TOTAL FLO* IN =
'TOTAL FLO* OUT =
123.18
•121.48
0.074
39.36
0.37
•l-l. 89
2152
2084
.179.25
'88.07
0.040
'16.25
0.24
7.36
.92
.49
129.97
59.' 18
0.031
10.48
0.19
5.95
173.81
'130.40
0.085
34.37
0.45
'14.43
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY•FLOWS(CMS)
•TKIBUT.ARY MONTH 'YEAR MEAN'FLO'd DAY
4011A1
FLOW DAY
FLOW 'DAY
• FLOW
40MA2
••1-1
112
ii
2
'3
4
5
6
7
•8
•9
ilO
ill
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
.10
.74
m
75
•75
75
,75
.75
.•75
75
•75
.'75
75
.74
(74
ns
•75
75
75
75
75
'75
75
75
75
I'll 5. 401
242.675
311.768
525.277
524.7,1,1
339;'flO?
596. .9 19
,1084.535
249.471
123.745
>100,;525
•49.413
569. -168
1178. '396
•156.309
310.^19
313.1184
174. '149
425.319
•703.674
• 148.-663
62.297
44. 174
25.485
2
20
.26
)16
29
•6
i!8
7
3C
2
17
28
25
•19
25
14
31
27
30
506.871
268.727
204.-731
410.594
404.931
277.222
855. '169
84.:10l
7.957
608.812
210,. 961
B1-.269
291.663
33 1.3': 7
• 116.665
639.9
-------
FLO* INFORMATION FO«.OKLAHOMA
LAKE CODE 4011
KEYSTONE
MEAN MONTHLY FLO*S AND JAILY FLOWS
TRIBUTARY MONTH rEAR MEAN FLOW DAY
4011dl
4011D1
4011E1
4011ZZ
11
12
1
2
3
i»
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
7b
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
1.47?
0.144
0.396
0.269
0.215
0.133
1.1 1>4
0.340
0.079
0.008
0.003
0.008
317.149
51.253
50.970
117.798
110.719
42.192
186. 6f 8
215.208
48.139
32.848
9.061
10.307
6.598
0.651
1.756
1.189
0.934
0.566
4.84?
1.472
0.340
0.037
0.014
0.042
165.192
16.141
32.848
58.899
35.113
13.875
99.675
48.139
6.796
3.964
1.133
1.416
2
17
2e
?e
19
25
19
14
31
8
30
2
14
26
23
15
24
9
30
31
10
10
2
14
26
23
15
24
a
30
31
1
10
10
17.640
0.198
0.034
0.0 J4
0.142
0.034
0.048
0.368
3.011
0.212
0.011
572.000
77.871
35.963
153.477
77.305
27.694
43.325
54.085
74. 190
8.297
4.814
79.287
0.269
0.176
1.75b
0.269
0.227
0.595
0.283
0.048
0.042
0.0
0.008
FLOW DAY
29
FLOW DAY
0.142
FLOW
27
0.0
-------
APPENDIX C
PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL DATA
-------
RETRIEVAL DATF. 77/03/24
DATE TIME OEPTi
FROM OF
TO DAY FEET
16 40 0000
16 aO 0005
16 40 0012
74/06/12 12 35 0000
12 35 OO^S
12 35 cOli
12 IS 002?
74/10/?3 10 50 0000
10 50 0005
10 =;o on 15
1C 50 Oo31
OOClu
Ct.MT
12.6
12.6
12.b
25.2
17.0
17.0
16.9
7.6
S.M
5.0
8.6
8.6
H.2
8.6
00300 OC077 00094
00 T«aNSP GNDliCTVY
SECC-I FIELD
IG/L INCi-itS MICROMHO
18
15
36
953
987
103}
11RP
1214
11M3
1259
1374
1373
1377
1387
401101
36 08 00.0 046 20 00.0 4
rvtfSTGNc *ESE«vOI«
tC037
100292
llt-'ALES
00? 6
00400
Ph
bU
7.75
7 • 7 3
7.70
8.50
8.6f;
rt.45
8.30
8.30
8.40
ei. 35
8.30
FEET OEHT
00410
T ALK
CAC03
Mb/L
124
123
122
117
117
1 15
1 19
108
107
106
108
04Q01002
- CLASS
00610
(MI j-N
TOTAL
MO/L
0.120
0.130
0.120
0.050
u.050
O.OSO
0.060
0.050
0.060
0.060
0.060
00
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
1.000
0.700
0.700
0.700
0.700
0.600
0.500
0.700
0.500
0.500
0.500
00t>30
N02&N03
M-TOTAL
Mb/L
0.700
0.710
0.700
0.560
0.560
0.640
0.570
0.250
0.250
0.250
0.260
00671
PnOb-uIS
MO/L
0 . 0 7 9
0. J76
0.071
0.076
0.076
0.093
0.078
0.022
0.025
0.024
0.024
-------
wtr^IEVAL tf
HUl 101
36 06 00.0 096 20 00.0 4
KEfSTGNE
-.0037
FEE'T OEPTH CLASS 00
OCb'iS 32217 00031
DATE TIN'c DC?TH PnOS-TuT CnL»P.-'L iNCuT LT
TO
-------
STJPET
'JAT£ 77/03/2',
4ull02
6 32 42.0 096 2n 37.0 3
40117
•JiTE
FM'JM
TO
74/0^/02
7^./r,6/l2
74/10/22
TI'-'F
OF
UAY
17 00
17 C-C
17 no
I*
14
14
14
16
16
16
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
OEPT-.
FEET
0000
0005
aoio
0000
0005
•J 0 1 •a
O'Jcb
00 OQ
OC05
no 12
C001U
.vATfc.fi
ftMP
CENT
16.4
16.^,
16.4
24.6
23.6
23.5
?2,H
16, a
16.7
is. 9
JO "100
MG/L
"•*.?
«.o
4.6
J.4
3.8
12,0
11.2
<^.k
lltPALES
OD077
Tr6
268
94
74
91
r)4
131
132
177
y4uO 1002
H CLASS
OOfrlO
i\n3-r>i
TOTAL
MG/L
0.090
0.080
0.090
0. 180
U.210
0.180
0.270
0.030
0.030
0.030
00
00625
TUT KJEL
N
MG/L
1,000
0.600
0.800
1.000
0. 700
U.800
0.900
1.000
0.800
0.800
00-330 00&71
PMOS-Jls
N-TOFAL UKTHO
MG/L P
0.127
0.126
0.133
0.082
0.114
U.09o
0.061
0.03S
0,046
0.136
0.370
0.360
0.350
0.400
0,460
0.460
u.330
0.020
0.020K
0,020
K VALUE K-iUWN 70
-------
STOKE i' RETRIEVAL OM'£ 7?/
DATE TIME D
rwov OF
TO OAf FEET
74/04/02 17 00 0000
17 00 COOS
5-TOT
MG/L r>
'l. ?0 1
74/D6/12
74/lu/?2
17
14
14
14
14
16
16
16
16
00
10
1C
10
10
10
10
10
10
00 1M
0000
0005
00 IS
002-D
0000
0003
0005
0012
L' . 2 1 1
" . 2d 7
v. Jo 9
v. .276
..?! 1
.1.206
f. 193
t .362
32217
A
•JG/L
23.7
1.9
0,':031
INCOT LT
PEKCENT
1.0
<*01 102
36 32 ^2.0 QQ6
37. U 3
0>
-------
*01103
36 09 06.0 096 15 1*.0 3
*01*3
100292
DAfb
Fr(0"
TO
7*/0*/03
TIME DEPTn
OF
DAY FEET
09 45 0000
09 -5 0005
•JV 45 0015
09 45 0030
U9 45 OC43
u9 45 OOb'j
«ATEK
TEMP
CENT
11.*
1 !.-»
11.*
11.*
11.2
9.7
00300
DO
MG/L
9.0
ri.e
HEPALES
0*00
0070 FEET OE&TM <;i_Abb
GC077
TK/JNSP
SECCHI
INCHES
20
OOC94
CNOUCTVt
FIELD
MICRO.MHO
563
666
6?0
718
735
1755
00*00
rn
SU
7.80
7.3C
7.80
7.80
7. ay
7. so
00*10
i ALK
CACO'j
MG/L
109
108
108
111
115
1*7
00610
NMJ-i'J
TOTAL
MO/L
0.160
0.160
U.160
0. 150
0.160
o. 150
1002
DO
00625
luT K.JEL
N
MG/L
0.700
0.600
0.600
0.600
0.600
u.600
00b30
NU2M^u3
.\I-TOTAL
MG/L
0.710
0./10
0.720
0.720
0.720
0.660
00671
HnOS-'jIS
OKTnO
MG/L *>
0.115
0.118
0.111
0.108
0.11H
0. 123
CJ665
DATE TIME DEPTH PMOS-TOT
FftOM OF
Tu DAY FEET MG/L f
7*/0*/03 09
0000
09 45 0005
09 45 0015
09 *5 U030
09 *5 00*5
09 *5 0065
J.126
0.12"
0.131
C. 130
; . 13*
0.13*
32217
CnL»PMrL
A
UG/L
3.2
00031
INCUT LT
KEMNING
PERCENT
-------
/7/OJ/2-
/T r'P
DATE Ti;
Fr^U1'' OF
TO uAI
74/U4/OJ 1
1
1
1
1
1
7WG6/12 13
13
13
13
13
7«./08/29 15
15
15
15
15
?4/jo/?3 10
10
10
10
10
f.^ r
f f
01
nc
00
on
on
OQ
01
CO
00
CO
rn
50
SO
'5D
5G
50
?5
?5
25
25
'S
)CPT-t
T.ET
00 CO
JO"1}
0015
00.30
1040
on so
0000
OOJ5
OJ15
0030
0052
0000
0015
0030
0045
0052
0000
OOOb
0015
0035
OC4H
OuO 1
»AT£x
CENT
12
1?
12
12
10
<->
?<*
2n
24
2<*
?3
26
26
26
27
27
17
17
17
17
17
0
.
•
.
.
.
•
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
•
.
.
.
.
•
.
;,
6
b
J
L,
1
5
6
3
1
7
H
7
7
1
5
0
u
0
•^
7
0030
00
*D
7.90
7.80
7.7C
7.7i,
8.30
8.30
8.3c
8.30
8.20
8.00
8.00
7.9b
7.70
7.65
8.3t;
8.30
8.20
a. 10
7.65
FEE!' Of
00410
T ALr.
CAC03
MG/L
122
125
126
123
115
141
108
108
116
125
124
131
130
132
131
128
109
109
109
110
164
04001002
i-T-i CLAsi
00610
NH3-.N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.090
0.090
0. 100
u.130
u.200
0.180
0.070
0.080
0.080
0.100
0.090
0.050
0.050
0.050
0.060
0.100
0.070
0.060
0.070
0.110
0.370
00
00625
TuT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.700
0.600
0.600
0.700
0.600
0.600
0.600
0.500
0.500
0.600
0.500
O.fiOO
0.600
0.500
0.600
0.800
0.800
0.500
0.500
0.600
0.300
00o30
N02«>iw3
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.630
0.650
0.640
0.630
O.D70
u.570
0.770
0.800
0.670
0.5<40
0.490
0.250
0.240
0.240
0.520
0.590
0.330
0.330
0.360
0.360
0.240
00&71
PHOS-Olb
ORTHU
MG/L P
0.0*1
0.081
0.081
0.092
0.111
0.116
0.117
0.118
0.095
0.075
0.069
0.03R
0.0*0
0.043
0.07e
0.084
0.036
0.043
0.050
0.057
0.117
-------
STORET K'
DATE 77/03/ct
36 07 45.0 096 20 10.0 3
KtYSTuNE *ESt*vOlK
40337 OKLAHOMA
1002^2
/T
04001002
0035 KEET OEPTri CLAbb 00
32217
DATE
F90'-'
Tu
74/M/03
74/06/12
74/08/29
74/10/23
TI
ME
DEPTH
PnOS-TOT CiLR^HYL
OF
UA
11
11
11
11
11
11
13
13
13
13
1 3
13
13
IS
15
15
15
15
10
10
10
10
10
19
10
r
00
00
00
CO
00
09
00
00
00
00
00
'"•0
on
50
50
50
50
50
?5
?c
?5
?S
?5
?5
?S
FEET
ooco
COJ5
OOlb
0030
GO^O
0050
0000
0001
0002
0005
0015
0030
0052
0000
0015
0030
0045
0052
0000
0003
0005
0005
0015
0035
3048
MO/L
0.
w •
0.
0.
u.
i> .
tj .
:>.
• •
•' •
0.
0.
r.
'' •
J •
>. •
Cu
c.
0.
c «
^ •
V. •
A
p UG/L
luO 11.5
106
104
110
12u
13S
1S8 1 .h
168
12<»
11M
107
081 4.B
OdO
092
132
293
078 18.4
062
0^4
107
201
OQ031
JC.JT L!
PERCENT
50.0
1.0
5.0
1.0
-------
bl'ORET riET-ME'vAL DATE 77/03/24
COO 10
DATE ii1-
FKUM 'IK
'E DEPTr, rt'ATEK
fLMP
TO OAT FEET
74/04/03
74/06/12
3
13
13
13
13
74/06/29 16
16
16
16
16
74/10/23 09
09
09
09
09
3C
30
30
30
30
TO
25
25
'5
25
25
25
'5
25
?5
?5
55
^5
55
55
55
0000
OOC5
0015
0025
Od35
0056
0000
0005
0015
0035
0056
0000
0015
0035
0040
0047
0000
0005
0015
0040
0052
CENT
12
12
12
11
11
11
2<»
24
23
24
24
26
?6
26
26
25
17
17
17
17
16
.3
.4
.3
.6
.3
.7
.6
.1
.9
.0
.1
.5
.5
.4
. 1
.6
.1
. 1
.1
.1
.6
DO
MG/L
9.
9.
8.
H.
5.
5.
4.
5.
*• .
6.
4.
1.
'-• •
fl.
8.
8.
7.
4.
14
U
6
8
6
6
9
0
6
0
-------
JAfF 77/03/?*.
/ T
DATE
V -~, 'J V
Tu
7W 9
09
u<3
09
c
30
30
30
30
30
10
25
?c
25
25
=s
?5
?5
?^
?i
'5
?S
?5
SS
^S
ss
cc;
c;c:
ss
=:S
OL-^T-i
FEET
uOOo
0 0 0 b'
OOib
0^25
003b
OObe
OOO'J
OOC1
OU02
fiOOb
00 Ib
0035
C056
0000
OOlb
003b
CO'.O
0047
0000
0003
'JOCb
0007
00 Ib
0 0 H I)
•^052
J-'OS-
MG/L
0 .
•- •
•s m
f).
J •
• •
•'•.
'••> •
^
~ *
c .
0.
»-,
C •
•' •
•J.
r
•' •
V* •
ft
•
•
') .
TOT
H
121
121
121
137
122
1S5
17s
1V2
132
lt>2
166
066
C72
089
212
325
107
1C*
U7
1 •'* 7
1 '«
32217 OOC31
-L»PHrL INCDT LT
fi t^FM\U;'o
UG/L PERCENT
11.0
0.3
3.0
12.4
50.0
l.C
5.0
1.0
36 09 12.0 096 19 36.0 3
•^ErST
^0037
100292
OObO FEET DtPTH CLASS 00
-------
DATE 77/C3/2*
36 11 48.0 096 22 J4.0 3
/T
j I /L AEPT~ .
JAr FEET
n
1 1
13
13
13
1*
14
1*
1*
1*
17
17
17
17
15
15
15
15
30
30
30
30
30
35
35
•}S
35
35
00
00
on
en
40
*o
*0
*0
0000
0005
0015
0025
0036
0000
UO.T5
C015
0025
0040
0000
0010
0025
0033
0000
0005
0020
0033
<4TCP
CENT
13
13
13
13
12
.?S
2*
?4
23
?2
27
27
27
27
17
17
1 7
17
.5
.*
.»•
.4
.3
.7
.6
.0
.*
.M
. u
.0
.0
.0
• 7
.9
.1
.6
00
MG/L
•g
9
o
6
5
4
3
2
S
~j
tt
1
lu
9
9
9
• 0
.<•
.2
.6
.6
.4
.H
.4
.6
.4
.8
.6
.2
.ft
.6
.6
00094
INCHES
16
FIELD
MICROMHO
1381
1435
1521
1604
2724
11
23
1526
1380
996
697
1845
1838
1954
2712
1777
1791
1853
3005
100791
1 1E^<
^L t S
0*00
00*1 FEET 0 £ f-1 T H C L A b b
00400
r>n
SU
7.90
7.90
7.90
7. 83
6.00
8.2C
3.20
8.20
8.20
e.n
8.20
8.10
8.00
7 . 8 n
8.47
8.* 7
8.41
8.43
00*10
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
96
96
96
97
151
1 1*
1 13
98
95
85
128
127
124
118
108
105
108
108
00610
NHj-N
TOTAL
Mu/L
0.190
0.190
0. 180
0.190
O.lbO
O.OMO
O.C80
U.200
0.240
0.290
O.ObO
O.ObO
0.060
0.100
0.020
0.030
0.033
0.030
1002
00
00625
TOT .-VJLL
N
MG/L
0.700
0. 700
0.600
0.600
0.600
0. 700
0.700
0.600
0.900
1.000
0.700
0.500
0.600
0.700
0.700
0.600
0.500
0.500
00030
N02&\0 j
IM-TOTAL
Mb/L
0.500
0.500
0.510
0.510
0.550
0.58U
O.bbO
0.480
0.480
0.420
0.220
0.220
0.350
0.600
0.460
0.470
0.470
0.450
00b71
PrtOS-OIS
OHThO
MG/L P
0.102
0.101
0.097
0.101
0.120
O.llh
0.115
0.084
0.079
0.067
0.038
0.0*6
0.054
0.077
0.058
0.057
O.OSfa
0.052
-------
STOPL1 *ET-?[EVAL OAl'E 77/03/2-
401 10t>
3b 11 48.0 096 22 34.0 3
i\£rSTUNE
1007S.1
/T
11EPALES
OO'+l fEET DEaTn
04001002
_t_ASb 00
DATE TIME ;
F^O" Of
00 665 32217 00031
)EPTi-i ariOS-TOT CuLPPnYL INC-.:; LT
A RE.-n.IMG
, TO 04Y FEET
74/04/03 13
13
13
13
13
7<«/06/l
-------
OAiE 77/03/34
JATE
0 (j 0 1 0
TI-iE OEPTn *ATES
OF TEMp
TO DAY FTET CENT
74/04/03 14 20 OOC3 lb.6
U ?0 OOOb 15.6
74/06/13 b-4 ?5 OOOU 23.5
09 ?5 0005 ?3.4
C9 P<= 00 IS 23. 1
09 PS 0021 ?3.0
74/10/2? 15 00 0000 16.4
15 00 0005 16.4
401)07
36 19 50.0 096 21 13.0 3
KEYSTONE
40113
100292
11EHALES 04001002
0007 FEET OtVTr! CLASS 00
CO 300
DO
MG/L
9.4
6.4
6.0
h.O
11.0
f.4
C ri 0 7 7
TRftMSP
SECCHI
INCHES
4
3
9
00094
CiMDuCTv'r'
FIELU
MIC-
-------
STORET KETKIEVAL CAT£ 77/03/24
•*01108
36 17 34.0 096 26 15.0 3
NtVSTCNE
401 13
DATE
F->Ov
TO
74/04/03
74/06/29
DATE
FROM
TO
74/04/03
74/08/29
TIME OiLPT-i
OF
L)AY FFET
14 ?5 0000
14 ?5 OOOb
14 ?5 0015
14 ?S 0024
11 05 0000
11 0* 00 10
11 05 0019
TIMF DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
14 ?5 0000
14 ?5 0005
14 ?5 0015
14 25 0024
11 05 0000
11 05 OC10
11 OS 0019
•jCOio
rt'ATEf<
TfMP
CENT
15.5
15.4
15.3
15.6
2-».C
23.7
26.5
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.39C
0.364
0.301
C .410
3.340
•J.443
0.417
00300
DO
•••»G/L
9.4
8.7
8.8
b.2
6.2
6.4
32217
CHLRPnrL
A
UG/L
71.1
10.9
0^077
Tr89
1057
1114
llcPALES 04001002
CU
00410
T A 1 iv
CAC03
Mo/L
186
198
178
174
118
115
116
>TM CLASS
OU610
Nn3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.060
0.060
0.060
0.070
O.OsO
0.050
0.070
00
00625
TOT t\JEL
N
MG/L
1.800
1.100
O.SOO
1.000
1.000
0.900
0.900
00630
i\G2kN03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.180
0.220
0.300
0.250
1.303
1.290
1.350
00671
PnGS-iJlS
UHTnO
MG/L P
0.052
O.Uo2
0.0&6
0.072
0. 187
0.187
0. 159
-------
STORtT n'ETP-IEvAL OATf ;?/OJ/2H
*01109
3o 12 *9.0 096 1* *0.0 3
KEYSTONE
*0113
100292
DATE
TO
7*/0*/03
7*/06/ 13
7^/08/29
7*/10/23
Tit
m
L)A1
is
15
15
15
15
10
10
1C
10
10
1
1
1
1
I
09
09
09
09
09
IE i
' F
15
15
15
IS
15
?0
20
?0
?0
?0
*0
*0
*0
*0
*0
20
20
?0
?0
?0
DEPTH «
'EET
0000
o 0 ."> 5
0015
3030
0055
OOJO
0005
0015
0030
0055
0000
0015
0030
00*0
00*5
0000
0005
0015
00*0
0050
GCC10
ATER
CENT
1?.
12.
12.
12.
12.
?3.
23.
23.
22.
22.
26.
?6.
26.
26.
?5.
16.
16.
16.
16.
16.
o
0
0
o
0
e
6
2
8
2
7
7
7
7
*
7
8
8
8
d
00300
00
MG/L
9.
9.
9.
9.
*.
*.
*.
*.
*.
*.
*.
*.
0.
6.
7.
6.
6.
1.
8
6
6
8
8
6
6
it
2
0
0
0
1
8
0
6
*
0
C77 OC09*
CNOuCTvt
SECOI FJELO
INCHES
18
12
*15
* 7*
560
578
6*9
59*
593
577
*8S
523
1033
1035
1035
10*1
103*
1056
10*2
1057
2060
11EPALES
0059
00*00
f>r\
So
7.95
7.95
7.90
7.90
7.90
7.60
7.70
7.60
7.60
7.bO
7. do
7.dO
7.75
7.80
7.60
7.80
7.60
7.8C
7. /o
7.50
0*001002
FEET UEPTh CLASS
00*10
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
10
10
11
13
18
105
107
106
96
83
111
111
113
11*
126
11*
115
11*
1 1*
157
00610
Nhj-U
TOTAL
Mo/L
0.1*0
0.120
0.120
0. 120
0.120
0.070
0.100
0.070
0.030
0.120
0.030
u.120
0.0*0
0.030
0.100
0.28U
0.0*0
0.050
O.ObU
0.160
00
00625
TOT KjtL
N
MG/L
0.300
0.700
0.700
0.600
0.600
0.600
0.500
0.500
0.500
0.600
0.900
0.500
0.500
O.*00
0.600
1.200
0.500
O.*00
O.*00
0.700
00e>30
N02
-------
STJ*ET «ET=>IEVAL DAI- 7//03/2'.
36 13 49.0 096 14 40.0 3
SESE-CvOi*
OK.L4-OMA
100292
UErALES 04G01U02
FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
OATE
TO
74/04/03
74/06/1 3
74/-Jtl/29
74/10/23
T I ^
r (•
•
134
133
139
129
1 17
lid
113
14.?
•JG/L PERCENT
6.8
ii . h
2.3
1.5
-------
STORET
/?A<3/.0
25.0
18.3
In. 3
18.2
18. 1
18.5
19.1
"
CAC03
MG/L
108
108
109
109
126
131
107
107
106
106
135
1*0
04001002
'TH CLASS
00610
,\n3-N
TOTAL
MQ/L
0.070
0.050
0.080
0.050
0.060
0.070
0.040
0.040
0.030
0.030
C.100
0.140
00
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MO/L
1.100
0.500
0.500
0.500
0.500
0.500
0.900
0.500
0.500
0.400
0.500
0.600
00630
N02NNU3
H- TOTAL
Mb/L
O.fa40
0.840
0.850
0.880
0.800
0.740
0.670
0.660
0.660
0.660
0.470
0.380
00671
PhOb-uIS
MG/L P
0.129
0.130
0.127
0.125
0.112
0.107
0.096
0.089
0.088
0.086
0.091
0.074
-------
Li A ft 77/03/54
Ti^r DEPTH PHOS-TOT
FrtOM OF
TO (JAY FLET MG/L P
7^/06/12 11 =:=; 0000 "!.197
11 SS COOS 0.1VB
11 S5 001S (,. 1»6
II 55 0030 0.182
11 =5 3050 C.157
11 cc; CO 76 0.1 db
74/08/29 10 7S 0000
74/10/2? 15 ?0 0000 0.121
15 ?C 0005 0.111
15 ?0 OOlb y.112
15 '0 CC34 0.109
15 ?0 0050 >^.1?2
15 ?0 0065 0.1?8
32217
OCC31
INCOT LT
UG/L
r.4
I .4
401110
36 03 42.0 046 15 27.0
KEYSTONE rttstriVOIf
40 143 OKLAHOMA
10Q2JJ2
lltPALES
OOHO FEET
DEPTH
04001002
CLASS 00
-------
STGRET RETRIEVAL OAT£ 77/03/24
DATE TIVE DLPT-i
FrtO" UF
TO OAY FEET
7<./06/13 04 50 0000
09 50 0005
09 50 0015
09 50 0025
74/10/22 15 IS 0000
15 15 00Gb
15 15 0020
00010
wATER
TtMP
CENT
23.5
23.4
23.3
23.2
16.1
16. 1
15.4
00300
00
MG/L
6.1
6.2
6.0
9.0
H.6
9.0
00077 00094
TrtiNSP CMDUCrvY
SECChI FIELD
INCHfc'i MICkOMHO
3 44SI
447
597
1335
1333
1439
401111
36 18 15.0 096 2* 20.0
KEYSTONE RESE
tOii3 OKLAHOMA
100292
11EPALES
04001002
0029 FEET DEPTH CLASS
00400
PH
su
7.60
7.80
7.70
7.40
8.33
8.35
8.49
00<+10
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
98
99
98
98
171
181
193
00610
NrtJ-.N.
TOTAL
MG/L
0.100
0.130
0.090
0.110
0.070
0.050
0.060
00
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.800
0.600
0.600
0.600
1.200
1.000
1.300
00630
N02NN03
M-TOTAL
MG/L
0.690
0.710
0.700
0.700
0.370
0.290
0.160
00b71
PHQS-'JIS
0*THO
MG/L R
0.132
0.127
0.128
0.128
0.111
0.119
0. 138
DATE
FROM
TO
74/06/ 13
74/10/22
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
09 50 0000
09 50 0005
09 50 0015
09 SO 0025
15 15 0000
15 15 0002
15 15 0005
15 15 0020
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.266
0.259
I .249
0.223
3.268
0.309
G.<»36
32217
CnLRPHVL
A
JG/L
4.4
181.1
00031
INCUT LT
REMNING
PERCENT
1.0
-------
APPENDIX D
TRIBUTARY AND WASTEWATER
TREATMENT PLANT DATA
-------
STdHtT RETRIEVAL OATr. 77/03/e*
36 07 30.0 096 06 5u.O <+
A*r\AHSAS SIvE.4
<»0 TULi" CO rt*Y MAP
DATE
TO
51 8KOG- .5 MI N SA-NU SPWIfJGS
11EPALES 0^001004
UOOO eEET OEPTM CLAbS 00
75/05/1* 17
TIMF DiI°TH
I'IK
UAr FEET
10 00
15 00
17 30
10 00
13 CO
17 30
17 no
12 ?0
uOo30
(J02MNG3
N-TiJTAL
MG/L
0,510
'. .750
c^aio
0.790
0,790
u'.*00
0.010
O.*30
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.500
1 .200
2.300
1.150
0 .'•SO
0.750
i. no
2.600
OC610
Nrt3i-N
TOTAL
Mf,/L
0.0*0
C,065
0.120
0,065
0.055
0.060
3.0 ?5
0.0*5
00671
PnOS-DIS
OKTnO
MG/L P
0,085
C.I 15
0.125
0.090
0.0^5
0.065
P. 060
0,070
00665
PMOS-TOT
MG/L r>
j.HO
0.150
0.125
0.130
0.110
0.090
0,180
0,110
-------
«'EI-
MG/L
0
1
1
1
1
U
'w
c
0
t
)
.22-
.120
.120
.2oO
.120
.s<-»0
.Cub
.HOO
,01'J
.040
.01 j
I! 0625
F 0 T (V, j £ L
MG/L
4.8CO
1.100
2.600
0.80C
2.500
1 W ."\ f '
!••/*.
2.200
2. "50
2.. TOO
2.150
i.er-o
C0610
Mr,/L
0.055
0.040
0.260
0.072
H.04*
0.0"»0
0.030
0.080
O.ObU
0.035
0.020
00671
MG/L P
0.110
0.210
0.135
O.?20
C.I 36
'.:. 1 24
0.060
0.170
0.110
u.240
0.120
36 22 35.0 0
-------
S'iOKL'T -JETr-iE'vAt JAfF 77/03/24
/ 7
OATE
F S 0 vi
ru
7<*/i 1/29
74/12/17
75/01/2H
75/02/2M
75/0 3/1'-}
75/0^/25
7=3/G£>/ 1«
75/07/31
75/10/10
TMC OE^T-1
or
UAf FEET
15 55
15 31
10 ?0
14 5C
10 35
10 JO
16 20
14 ?0
16 05
Oo630
NO 2s NO 3
N-T"TAL
MO/L
v'.0b6
•:.112
D.112
0.160
C.100
3 .040
0. 160
C.OOtj
0.005
00625
TOT KJEL
N1
MG/L
1.100
l.COO
0.400
0.500
2.200
1.500
1 .350
1.550
O.'^OO
00610
NrO-i\
TOTAL
M(j/L
0.025
0*035
0.024
0.016
0*040
0.025
G.060
0.032
0.020
40lldl
36 18 35.0 096 37 15.0 4
HELLROAWIMG C^'EEK
40 15 SKEuEE
T/Kf.rSTCHE RESE^vOiK 1002^1
SEC KU 8*00 1.5 VI N OS -fwY 64
11EHALES 0400100
-------
ST.3SE.T
l. OATE 77/03/?-*
/TYPA/A'-
U0630 00625
DATE THE DEPTH •1,G?'>N03 TOT i\j£L
FHuM OF \- TOTAL N
TO
7^/11/29
7«»/ 12/17
75/01/2H
75/02/28
75/0 3/ 19
75/<."*/r>5
75/06/ 1<4
75/07/31
75/08/27
75/10/30
DAY
15
1<«
09
15
11
10
15
15
13
15
K V/iLUL *
FF.ET MO/L
35
i.5
TS
'•S
\z
30
15
30
30
30
lOrfNi TO -3E
^ .3O1*
C . 1 20
C .03b
0.168
•J.?0«
0.130
'. .090
0.005
0.0^0
n.0^5
MG/L
1.100
1.700
0.4QO
0.700
2. no
.u?3
.300
.050
.200
.100
00610
ivn 3-N
T u T fll.
MG/L
('.025
S .0^0
7.02^
n.024
c.u**^
0.030
".0^5
0.03C
C.07C
0.020
LESS THAN INDICATED
OG671
4C11C1
3o I/ 05.0 096 3* 15.0 <«
KANCH C«t£*
nO IS 5KEuEE
TMEfbTONE RESEP.vuIK 100241
HWY 6<» BP.OG 0.2 Ml « OK JCT h HrfY
llt^ALES 0^00100'*
0000 l-'EET DEPTH CLASS 00
MG/L P
0.035
0.010
0.010
O.OOS
o. o o a
0.003
0 . •} 1 5
O.Olu
0.015
C.005K
00665
PriOS-ToT
MO/L P
0.100
U.050
C.010
0.060
0.030
0.060
U.O 70
0.090
0.190
0.030
-------
HiETrilEVAL
401101
3b 03 15.0 097 46 00.0 4
-*0 PAY-\E CO H.*Y MAP
T/«EYSTONE PESEKvOlR 100791
ri*Y 18 BROG 4 "t N CUSnING
IIE'-'ALES OnOOlOOt
oooo FEET OEPT-. CLASS uo
DATE Tlf-'E DE°T-<
F»v" OF
TO DAY FEET
75/01/26
75/C2/23
75/03/15
75/05/09
75/06/30
75/07/31
75/09/10
75/10/06
11
14
12
18
17
17
14
15
50
?5
00
05
C 0
?0
55
16 10
0630
'\rj03
'JTAL
iG/L
0.900
0.768
J.950
C.950
O.C05
0.010
0.390
0.4QO
0*040
0.010
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
1.500
1.200
3.100
UbOO
1*550
O.HOQ
2.500
1 1,600
1.200
1.400
00610
N.-O-N
TOTAL
MG/L
U. 140
: . 1 44
0* 1C4
0.144
0.035
0.020
0.080
0.030
0.020
0.035
OP671
PHOS-OIS
OWTHO
MG/L f
O.'OC
•;.HS
0.09b
0.120
0.115
0.090
0.147
0.145
0.180
0.220
00665
PnOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.400
d.d. 30
0.630
0.320
0.220
0.1/0
0*400
0*500
Os 360
0*420
-------
. Art
77/03/2'>
4011E1
36 08 50.0 096 35 40.0 4
LAGOON C«EEK
40 15 YALE
T/KEYbTONE ^ESERVOIK 100791
SEC rtU BWOG 1.2 Ml •« AMU 2 Ml S JENNlNi-S
llL^ALES 04001004
oooo FEET uEeTn CLASS ou
DATE
Fr
-------
SlOrfET SETPIEVAL DATE 7//03/2-*
<+011E2
36 1? 15.0 096 41 45.0
LAGOON C*£E^
*0 Ib YALE.
T/KEi'STONE
2NOWY RO
11EPALES
0000 FEET
3.b
100791
OF MA^ANCES
04U01004
CLASS DO
DATE
FPOK
TO
74/12/14
75/01/26
75/02/23
75/03/15
75/04/24
75/f 5/08
75/06/30
75/07/31
75/09/10
75/10/06
TIME f
OF
DAY F
12 lu
10 30
15 05
11 ?0
16 55
15 ?0
16 35
14 05
15 05
16 50
r)£PTri 1402
N-T
FEET M
0630
'J>N03
'OTAL
iG/L
u.bo<»
0.-«32
0.^32
0.590
•).035
C.*2G
0.120
0.005
0.0 HO
C.OC5
00625
TOT KJ'L
N
MG/L
1. 100
O.oOO
1.100
0.900
1.C50
1.100
2.600
1.000
0.950
0.700
0^610
Nr! 3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.025
0.006
0.0^0
0.031
0.015
O.C45
0.330
0.015
0.010
0.0^0
00671
PH05-DIS
•JBThO
MG/L P
0.010
0.005
0.040
0.008K
0.005K
O.OOS
0.01C
0.010
0.005K
00665
PnOS-TGT
MG/L P
0.060
O.OlOK
0.130
0.040
0.090
0.020
0.060
0.090
0.050
0.030
K.'JOWM TO B£
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
ST'JRET SETrUEVAL OAT£ VV/03/24
DATE TIME DEPTH N'02>sN03
FROM OF
TO DAY FEET
74/1 1/29
74/12/1"
75/01/05
75/02/09
75/03/01
75/04/06
75/04/30
75/05/03
75/06/14
75/07/30
75/0*3/02
75/10/12
11
13
10
10
15
10
13
10
14
14
13
10
40
15
15
30
nr,
(>(<
30
30
no
on
3P
45
4vllFl
36 Oe 00.0 09ft
SALT CPEEK
nO PAYNi
T/MiYSTONE
nwY 51 BflOG
11EPALES
<»5 45.0 A
O MwY MttP
100292
OF YALE
0400100-+
MI
oooo FEET OEPT- CLASS oo
0630
<.N03
OTAL
iG/L
G.2dO
-'.240
:.176
C.216
C . 2 1 6
C. 100
&.230
0.185
0.005
0.0o5
0.005
3.010
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
O.bOO
1.200
1.050
0.900
1.050
0.450
1.350
0.950
0.900
0.600
00610
NH.T-Ni
TOTAL
MC;/L
0.030
C.125
0.176
0.152
0.072
•J.030
0 . 1 95
0.105
0.065
0.030
O.C30
C.C20
00671
PnOS-OIS
OtVTmj
MG/L P
O.OOSK
0.025
0.020
0.016
O.OOoK
0.015
0.025
0.040
0.010
0.015
0.015
0.010
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.010K
C.090
0.065
0.060
0.040
0.015
0.210
0.070
0.090
0.090
0.070
•\'
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DUE 77/CJ/V4
fPA/A'-'bNT/ST--> AM
Jto 0<* 20.0 096 48 00.0 4
COUNCIL C^EEK
•+0 PAYNE co M«(Y •->£.-
TMcYSTOME KEStKvOlK 1002*2
2NDHY WO riROC- 2 Ml * OK JCT w HWY 16
11EPALES 04001004
0000 FEET DEPTH CLAsS 00
OATE
FRQy
TO
74/1 1/29
74/1 ?/14
75/01/05
75/02/09
75/03/01
75/04/Ob
75/04/30
75/05/03
75/06/26
75/07/30
75/03/02
75/ 10/12
TI\
0^
00630 00625
1F OEPT-i N02NN03 TOT KJEIL
\-TOTAL N
UAY FEET MG/L
12
13
10
io
15
la
!<+
11
15
14
14
11
30
30
45
00
30
30
00
nn
no
30
OP
no
K V"LU£ rhOi
LESS
T-i,
AN Ii
(5
0
I,
A
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
r.
V
WN ro rfc
NO ic. Me o
.336
.204
.224
.336
.240
.-220
.230
.230
*260
.220
.220
.220
MG/L
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
.700
.700
.130
*800
.700
.300
*300
.950
.650
.750
.750
0-7
MH3
TUT
MG
fi
,-i
0
f;
M
0
>
0
0
0
c
0
610 00671 00665
-N PriOS-UIS PnOS-TOT
AL OSTHO
/L
.060
.070
*160
^176
.li-4
.025
.135
.105
*030
.020
.010
.025
MG/L P
a
0
0
0
0
a
0
6
0
0
0
0
.005
.015
.U15
.016
.QObK
.010
.035
.030
.005
.010
.010
.010
MG/L P
0«010K
0.070
0.0 7u
0.060
C.020
O.C20
0.250
0.040
0.070
0.070
0.040
-------
f£ 77/03/?4
•401103
36 08 00.0 096 52 4b.O 4
COUNCIL CnfEE.*
40 PAYNE CO n*'Y MAP
T/KtYbTONE «ESf.'tfvOI3 1002*2
51 9*00 9.5 Ml E OF STILL«ATER
ES U4001004
0000 FEET OEHTn CLASS 00
uATE
TO
74/1 1/29
74/12/14
75/01/05
75/02/09
75/03/01
75/U4/06
75/04/30
75/05/03
75/U6/26
75/07/30
75/08/02
75/1V/12
TIME DL3Tr
ut\
11
1 3
09
11
14
09
13
10
11
13
13
10
r FEET
?o
on
45
00
30
30
00
00
20
30
.10
30
1>C630 00625
-i N02C.N03 TOT KJEL
"i-T()T«L N
MG/L
0
)
0
0
0
3
(J
0
0
j
V
0
.560
.352
.320
.352
.240
.210
.230
.220
.370
.210
.?1C
.005
MG/L
0.
i.
i.
0.
0.
c.
1.
c.
c.
0.
0.
700
?ou
200
900
450
200
800
800
*?5
6SO
hOO
00610
Nn3-N f
TOTAL
MG/L
n
.;
o
0
c
0
A
0
0
fl
:
0
.045
.155
.112
.168
.024
.020
. 150
.195
.550
.040
.045
.020
OT671
JhOS-OIS p
ORTHO
MC-/L f
0
0
u
0
0
C
0
0
0
0
0
0
.005K
.CIS
.017
.COS
• OOBK
.005^
.040
.045
.010
.010
.005
.015
00665
nOS-FOT
MG/L H
0.010K
O.U6U
0.070
C.050
0.020
0.310K
0.180
0.040
0.040
0.040
0.070
K ViL'Jr K :\j1>'-: TO Be
LESS TH;\I\' I'JOIC-TCu
-------
bTOSET RETRIEVAL DATE 77/03/24
/TrVA/AM3NT/STHt.AM
4011H1
36 01 30.0 056 36 *5.0 *
TI«',Ex CrtEEls
tt1 15 ffitt
T/r.trbTOiNE REStrfvGl^ 1007><1
LGrtT OTY «D ?r
-------
RETRIEVAL uATE Y7/03/2*
401U1
36 01 50.0 096 37 50.0 4
EJCntE CKEEK
nO 15 YALE
TMtYSTONE KESEKVOH 100791
E-*1 SEC LINE 30 1.5 MI MM* OF PEMETA
11EPALES 04001004
0000 FEET QEPTn CLASS 00
DATE
FHOX
TO
75/01/26
75/02/23
75/03/16
75/04/24
75/05/OH
75/06/30
75/07/31
75/09/10
75/09/30
C0b30 00625
TIME DLPTn N02iN03 TOT KJ£L
Of N-TuTAL N
LiAT FF.ET rtO/L MG/L
0.124 0.900
1*5
09
15
14
15
12
13
10
Ib
40
3"
05
30
55
45
40
.5
0
0
r,
*
A
0
0
.2o«
.264
.005
.240
.010
.005
.005
.005
2
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
.ICO
.330
.600
.100
.100
.000
.200
.000
00610 00671 00665
NHJ-N PhOS-OiS PHOS-TuT
TOTAL OrtTriO
MiVL MG/L P MG/L P
0.056 0.146 0.200
0
0
0
c
0
0
a
.OttO
.060
.010
.105
.015
.010
.030
0.
0.
0 .
0.
c .
0.
0.
0.
0/2
152
015
W+0
020
017
010
080
0.350
0.190
0.080
0.100
0.0 9u
0.110
0.100
0 . 220
-------
STORE! «ET^IEVAL DATE 77/03/24
36 02 40.0 096 42 30.0 4
SKJLL CREEK
-*0 15 YALt
T/^trSTONE KESttfvOIrt 100791
E-*1 SEC LINE ^D 4.5 MI S OF YALE
ll£pALEii 04001004
oooo FEET DEHTH CLASS oo
DATE
F30N'
TO
75/01/26
75/02/^3
75/03/16
75/C4/24
75/C5/08
75/06/30
75/07/31
75/09/10
75/10/06
Tl^'F i
OF
DAY F
11 30
14 40
11 45
17 20
15 45
17 01
\t+ i+n
15 45
17 PS
FEET
00630
NG/?^J03
N-TuT AL
MO/L
0.316
'.! . »»00
'••.528
C.I 95
0.770
1.250
'J.<»90
2.630
3.200
C0625
TOT Kj£L
N
MG/L
11.000
2.500
3.750
1.550
1.250
2. 100
14.500
8.HOO
17.000
0 •' 6 1 0
Nrl j-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.600L
0.920
1.720
0.035
n.170
?.060
9.3UO
8.000
3.150
OC671
PnOS-OlS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.012
0.104
0.008
0.005
0.015
0. J30
0.050
0.130
0. 165
00665
"MOS-TOT
MG/L r1
0.020
0.230
0.010
0.050
0.050
O.llb
0.270
0.220
0.315
-------
STo«ti
itviL DATE: 77/03/2^
POOJ500
36 1* 30.0 096 28 00.0
CLEVELAND
<»o 7.5 CLEVELAND
u/KtrSTONE
KEVSTONE
11EPALES 0000100*.
OOOU FEET DE^Tn CLASS 00
QiTE TIME DE^T-i N02
FSuM OF
TO OAf FEET
75/06/23
75/07/07
75/C7/31
75/Ob/O^
75/08/18
7b/03/01
75/09/39
75/10/13
75/10/27
75/11/OM
75/11/10
75/1
14 00
16 30
08 30
11 30
20 00
23 00
20 30
09 00
08 30
09 30
08 30
15 00
0630
'c>N03
OTAL
iG/L
0.100
0.0 ?i>
0.025
C.0?5
0.025
U.C25
0.025
0.070
0.050
).22b
0.075
0.25u
006P5
TUT KJEL
N
MO/L
6.000
2.900
9.300
9.300
9.^.00
11.500
n.soc
12.500
11. COO
1 1.000
13.000
ll.OOC
00610
NM3-N
TOT4L
MG/L
0.050K
0.025iv
0.025K
0.05C
0.0 25K
0.02SK
0.050
0.03^.
0.535
1.0 ?5X
0.1 1(J
00671
PMOS-DIS
OPTMO
MG/L P
1.750
0.775
1.200
0.922
0.^90
0.673
0.470
1.100
1.500
3.900
2.500
3.40C
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
2.500
1.30C
1.900
1.700
l.HOC
1.600
1.700
1.800
2.300
4.000
3.500
5.700
50051 50053
FLGw CONDUIT
HATE FLO*'-MGO
INST MOO MONTHLY
VALUt. KUOWJ (0 3£
is THAN INDICATED
-------
STJKtir "(ETKIEVAL OATE 77/03/24
401UA TF<+011XA
35 58 30.0 096 35 00.0 4
PQ03000
T/KEYSTONE ^ESERvOI
TIGER CREEK
/AMWNT/STKtf-' IIEPALE'S
oooo FEET
DATE
FftO'-'
TO
75/05/05
75/05/26
75/06/10
75/07/02
75/07/29
75/09/0*
75/10/13
75/11/14
76/01/06
76/04/06
TIME DEPTn
Of
(JAY
OB
13
08
09
08
09
13
14
09
09
FELT
40
30
30
00
3C
15
30
00
00
00
OC630
N02&N03
N- TOTAL
MG/L
rt.HUO
5.300
7.900
9.200
8.300
7.200
9.600
9.000
2.700
3.600
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
10.500
7.800
5.000
5.200
3.7&0
8.300
16.500
17.000
23.000
15.00C
0<>61C
Nri3-\
TOTAL
MG/L
0.1 50
0.180
0.28C
0 . 360
0 .445
0.430
1.200
3.000
4. POO
2.750
00671
PnOS-OIS
OKTHO
MG/L o
4.600
4.400
3.700
9.200
8.100
10.000
1 1.500
8.500
5.«00
7.000
00665
PnOS-TOT
DEPTH
50051
FLO
'«
50
r
« 100892
OOOOlOOn
CLASS 00
053
CONuUlT
WATE FLOrt*"MbD
MG/L P
6.700
8.600
4.800
10.000
8.900
10.500
14.000
10.500
8.100
10.000
INST
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
MGD
27R
246
136
243
235
130
185
198
212
MONTHLY
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.245
.372
.161
.253
.197
.In2
.129
.209
.209
-------
bTOHET *ETPIE'/AL
77/03/24
•+OHYA TF<*011YA
35 59 00.0 096 43 00.0 4
P007000
DATE
FROM
TO
75/05/23
CPITI-
75/05/23
75/06/13
CP(T>-
75/06/1 3
75/C7/OJ
CP (T) -
75/07/03
75/1/7/25
CP(T>-
75/07/25
75/08/15
CM(T)-
75/08/15
75/09/05
CP(T>-
75/09/05
75/09/26
CP(T)-
75/09/26
75/1C/17
CP(T)-
75/13/17
75/1 1/07
CP(T>-
75/1 1/07
75/11/28
CPI n-
75/1 1/2H
75/l.?/19
CP-
75/12/19
76/01/09
CP(T)-
76/01/09
00630
TIME QEPT-i N02J.N03
OF
UAY
11
16
11
16
11
16
11
16
11
16
11
16
U
16
11
16
11
16
11
1*
11
16
11
1*
FEET
00
OP
on
oo
00
on
00
00
00
no
On
nn
00
00
01
po
00
on
on
/10
no
fi~>
no
f.C
N-TuTAL
Mb/L
0.700
0.650
0.025
0.075
0.050
0.075
.1 . 1 25
0 .050
1.570
.;.72b
i'. 975
1.1 JO
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
<*.600
3.100
5.000L
4.500
6.100
7.900
11.000
15.000
9.200
7.000
8.dOC
16.000
•*0 15
T/KErSTONE *ESERvOI^
COTTONWOUD C3EEK
11EPALES 00001C04
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
00610 OC671 00665 50051 50053
Ni3-N PrtOS-uIS PnOi-TOT FLO/I CONDUIT
TOT&L UPTHO RATE FLOW-MUD
MG/L MG/L P MG/L P INST MGD MONTHLY
100892
P.05CK l.SJO
0.025K 0.750
0.7^0
0.031
0.033 u.710
O.OR4
0.110
0.110 8.400
I.eOO 0.700
1.400 0.700
1.200 0.700
n.025 1.500 2.500 0.700
0.034 3.800 4.500 0.690
6.500 8.500
0.360
O.HOO
2.600 0.690 0.900
1.300 0.432 0.695
O.bOO
1.10C 1.600 0.750 0.700
0.690
1.650 2.500 0.690 0.700
0 .690
".025K 3.400 4.200 0.690 0.790
U. 7HO
0.765
9.500 0.432 0.700
v/ALUl-. K .OWN I\J dr
-------
bTORET RETRIEVAL DATE 77/03/24
4011YA TF4011YA P007000
35 59 00.0 096 43 00.0 4
GUSHING
40 15 AGPA
T/KEISFONE REStRVOI* 100892
COTTON*000 CPFEK
11EPALES OOOOIOQ'*
0000 KEET DEPTi CLASS 00
DATE
TO
,/01/30
-
UME
OK
J4Y
11 0
DEPTH
FEET
i*
00630
NU2e.N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
Q.925
U062S
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
16.000
C0610
Nr13-N
TOTAL
MG/L
^.490
00671
PnOi-DIS
OPTriO
MG/L P
y.^oc
00665
PMOS-TOT
MG/L P
10.500
50051
RATE
INST MGD
0.517
50053
CONdUlT
FLO*-MGD
MONTHLY
u.bOO
76/01/30 16 00
-------
APPENDIX E
PARAMETRIC RANKINGS OF LAKES
SAMPLED BY NES IN 1974
STATE OF OKLAHOMA
-------
LAKE DATA TO 9E USED IN RANKINGS
LAKF.
CODE LAKE NAvi£
4001 ALTi'S RESERVOIR
^00? APSUOLE LA«F.
4003 LAKE ELLSWORTH
4004 LAKE tilFAuLA
4005 FORT CO-^B
4006 FORT SUPPLY
4007 FOSS r>*y RESERVOIR
400« LAKE FRANCES
4009 GPAND LAKE 0' THE CHE^O*
4010 LAKE HEFNER
4011 KEYSTONE RESERVOIR
4012 OULOGAH LAK£
4013 TENKILLER FERRY RESEKVOI
4014 LAKE
<*015 BISTER R
4fi34 TcXOMA LAKE
TOTAL r
O.OHl
0.020
0.037
0.031
0.03*
0.070
0.027
0.142
0.087
0.057
0.1 36
0.059
0.039
0.027
0 . n d 0
0.1*5
"EDIAN
0.060
0.070
0.070
0.405
0.110
0.135
0 . 0 ^ (l
1.780
(1.740
0.250
0.690
0.580
0.550
0.150
0.230
0. 160
500-
MEAN SEC
468.625
443.600
459.400
482.513
45*. 667
485.167
463.857
484.333
^68.857
461.000
484.303
483.000
435.500
465.000
*78.500
460.875
MEAN
CMLOnA
14. 750
7,027
8.430
4.383
14.967
9.733
4.862
7.973
6.768
5.667
21.427
5.137
b.646
8.422
4.812
12.325
Ib-
MIN 00
8.400
14*600
9.4QO
14.200
8.400
7.800
8.400
8.200
14.800
9.000
14.900
14.600
15.000
12.000
15.000
14.600
MEDIAN
OISS DRTHO P
0.010
O.OOA
0.009
0.029
0.012
0.014
0.006
0.093
0.038
0.036
0.096
0.031
0.016
0.009
0.016
0.016
-------
OF LAKT9 WITH HIGHER VALUES (NUMRFn OF LAKES WITH HIGHER VALUES)
LAKE
CODE LAKE NAME
4001 ALT'jS
40U3 LAKE
400* LAKE EUFAULA
&nns KO^T cone ri
400^ FOPT SUPPLY
4007 FOSS DA*1
4008 LAKE FRANCES
4QI.H GRAND LAKE 0' THE CHE*(K
4010 LAKE HEFNER
4011 KEYSTONE RESFUVOIP
4012 OOLOGAH LAKE
4013 TENKILLER FE»PY
4014 LAKE THUNDEPPIRO
4015 rflSTErt P.ESERVOIK
4634 TEXQMA LAKE
MEDIAN
TOTAL *
6n
100
PO
20
73
33
93
0
13
07
7
40
67
87
27
53
( Q)
( 15)
( 12)
( 3)
( 11)
( S)
( 14)
( 0)
( 2)
( 7)
( 1)
( 6)
( 10)
( 13)
( 4)
( 8)
MEDIAN
INOPG N
100 (
TO (
40 C
33 (
73 1
67 (
80 (
0 (
7 (
^0 (
13 <
20 (
?7 (
60 (
47 (
53 (
15)
13)
13)
5)
11)
10)
12)
0)
1)
b>
2)
3)
4)
<*>
7)
8)
500- "IEAN
MEAN SEC CHLOfcA
»7 (
43 (
f>0 (
?7 (
87 (
0 (
60 (
7 (
40 (
67 (
13 (
20 (
100 (
53 (
33 (
73 (
7)
14)
12)
4)
13)
0)
9)
I)
b>
10)
2)
3)
15)
9)
5)
11)
13
53
33
100
7
27
87
47
t>U
73
0
80
67
40
93
20
( 2)
( 6)
( 5)
( IS)
( 1)
( 4)
( 13)
( 7)
( 9)
( 11)
( 0)
( 12)
< 10)
( 6)
( 14)
( 3)
13-
MIN 00
80 (
33 (
60 (
47 (
80 (
100 (
80 (
93 (
20 (
67 (
13 (
33 (
3 (
53 (
3 (
33 (
11)
4)
9)
7)
11 )
1?)
11)
14)
3)
10)
2)
4)
0)
fl)
0)
4)
"EOIAN
OISS OPTHO P
73 (
93 (
67 (
33 (
67 (
60 (
100 (
7 (
13 <
20 <
0 (
27 (
50 (
80 (
40 (
50 (
11 )
14)
1?)
*)
10)
0)
IS)
1 )
?)
3)
0)
4)
7)
1?)
6)
7)
------- |