U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
WORKING PAPER SERIES
REPORT
ON
OOLJOGAH RESERVOIR
NOWATA AND ROGERS COUNTIES
OKLAHOMA
EPA REGION VI
WORKING PAPER No, 592
CORVALLIS ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY - CORVALLIS, OREGON
and
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING & SUPPORT LABORATORY - LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
•&G.P.O. 699-440
-------
REPORT
ON
OOLJOGAH RESERVOIR
NOWATA AND ROGERS COUNTIES
OKLAHOMA
EPA REGION VI
WORKING PAPER No, 592
WlTH THE COOPERATION OF THE
OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF POLLUTION CONTROL
AND THE
OKLAHOMA NATIONAL GUARD
MARCH, 1977
-------
REPORT ON OOLOGAH RESERVOIR
NOWATA AND ROGERS COUNTIES, OKLAHOMA
EPA REGION VI
by
National Eutrophication Survey
Water and Land Monitoring Branch
Monitoring Applications Laboratory
Environmental Monitoring & Support Laboratory
Las Vegas, Nevada
and
Eutrophication Survey Branch
Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory
Corvallis, Oregon
Working Paper No. 592
OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
March 1977
-------
CONTENTS
Page
Foreword i i
List of Oklahoma Study Lakes iv
Lake and Drainage Area Map v
Sections
I. Conclusions 1
II. Lake and Drainage Basin Characteristics 4
III. Lake Water Quality Summary 6
IV. Nutrient Loadings 13
V. Literature Reviewed 19
VI. Appendices 20
-------
11
FOREWORD
The National Eutrophicatlon Survey was Initiated in 1972 in
response to an Administration commitment to investigate the nation-
wide threat of accelerated eutrophication to freshwater lakes and
reservoirs.
OBJECTIVES
The Survey was designed to develop, in conjunction with state
environmental agencies, information on nutrient sources, concen-
trations, and impact on selected freshwater lakes as a basis for
formulating comprehensive and coordinated national, regional, and
state management practices relating to point source discharge
reduction and nonpoint source pollution abatement in lake water-
sheds.
ANALYTIC APPROACH
The mathematical and statistical procedures selected for the
Survey's eutrophication analysis are based on related concepts
that:
a. A generalized representation or model relating
sources, concentrations, and impacts can be
constructed.
b. By applying measurements of relevant parameters
associated with lake degradation, the generalized
model can be transformed into an operational
representation of a lake, its drainage basin, and
related nutrients.
c. With such a transformation, an assessment of the
potential for eutrophication control can be made.
LAKE ANALYSIS
In this report, the first stage of evaluation of lake and
watershed data collected from the study lake and its drainage
basin is documented. The report is formatted to provide state
environmental agencies with specific information for basin
planning [§303(e)], water quality criteria/standards review
[§303(c)], clean lakes [§314(a,b)], and water quality monitoring
[§106 and §305(b)] activities mandated by the Federal Water
Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972.
-------
m
Beyond the single lake analysis, broader based correlations
between nutrient concentrations (and loading) and trophic condition
are being made to advance the rationale and data base for refine-
ment of nutrient water quality criteria for the Nation's freshwater
lakes. Likewise, irultivariate evaluations for the relationships
between land use, nutrient export, and troohic condition, by lake
class or use, are being developed to assist in the formulation of
planning guidelines and policies by the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency and to augment plans implementation by the states.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The staff of the National Eutrophlcation Survey (Office of
Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency)
expresses sincere appreciation to the Oklahoma Department of
Pollution Control for professional involvement, to the Oklahoma
National Guard for conducting the tributary sampling phase of the
Survey, and to those Oklahoma wastewater treatment plant operators
who provided effluent samples and flow data.
Dr. Denver Talley, Director, Oklahoma Department of Pollution
Control; the staff of the Oklahoma Water Resources Board; and the
staff of the Oklahoma State Department of Health reviewed the pre-
liminary reports and provided critiques most useful in the prepara-
tion of this Working Paper Series.
Major General John Coffey, Or., the Adjutant General of
Oklahoma, and Project Officers Colonel Curtis W. Milligan and
Major James 0. Haney, Jr., who directed the volunteer efforts of
the Oklahoma National Guardsmen, are also gratefully acknowledged
for their assistance to the Survey.
-------
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
STUDY LAKES
STATE OF OKLAHOMA
LAKE NAME
Altus Reservoir
Arbuckle Lake
Lake Elsworth
Lake Eufaula
Fort Cobb Reservoir
Fort Supply Reservoir
Foss Dam Reservoir
Lake Frances
Grand Lake 0' The Cherokees
Lake Hefner
Keystone Reservoir
Oologah Lake
Tenkiller Ferry Reservoir
Lake Thunderbird
Wister Reservoir
COUNTY
Greer, Kipwa
Murray
Caddo, Comanche
Haskell, Mclntosh,
Okmulgee, Pittsburg
Caddo
Woodward
Custer
Adair
Mayes, Delaware, Craig,
Ottowa
Oklahoma
Tulsa, Creek, Osage, Pawnee
Nowata, Rogers
Cherokee, Sequoyah
Cleveland
LeFlore
-------
— 3T-OO—
OOLOGAH RESERVOIR
Trihutiiry r,,unp| ing Silo
lake S-inipi in
-------
REPORT ON OOLOGAH RESERVOIR, OKLAHOMA
STORE! NO. 4012
I. CONCLUSIONS
A. Trophic Condition:*
On the basis of field observations and Survey data,
Oologah Reservoir is considered eutrophic, i.e., nutrient
rich and productive. Whether such nutrient enrichment is
to be considered beneficial or deleterious is determined
by the actual or potential impact upon designated beneficial
water uses of each lake.
Chlorophyll a_ levels in the lake ranged from 0.3 yg/1
to 15.5 yg/1, with a mean of 5.1 yg/1. Potential for pri-
mary productivity as measured by algal assay control yield
was high, and Secchi disc visibility was very low. Of the
16 Oklahoma lakes samped in 1974 (including Lake Texoma),
6 had higher median total phosphorus levels, 3 had higher
median inorganic nitrogen values, and 4 had higher median
orthophosphorus levels than Oologah Reservoir.
Survey limnologists noted the lake was extremely turbid,
and did not report any problem algal blooms or aquatic
macrophyte growths.
*See Appendix E.
-------
B. Rate-Limiting Nutrient:
The algal assay results indicate that Oologah Reservoir was
limited by available phosphorus at the times of assay sample col-
lection (04/02/74, 10/21/74). The lake data indicate primary
limitation by phosphorus at the other sampling times as well. How-
ever, the low productivity estimated from chlorophyll a^ levels is
most likely limited by light penetration rather than nutrient
availability.
C. Nutrient Controllability:
1. Point sources -
During the sampling year, about 2.0% of the total phos-
phorus load to Oologah Reservoir was contributed by point
sources. The city of Nowata contributed 2.0%, and the city
of Delaware contributed <0.l%.
2
The calculated annual phosphorus loading of 3.45 g P/m /yr
is approximately four times greater than Vollenweider's (1975)
"eutrophic" loading for lakes with such volume and retention
time. However, Vollenweider's model may not be applicable to
lakes in which epilimnetic light penetration is severely reduced
by the presence of suspended sediments in the surface waters.
If, in fact, the nutrient contributions of the Verdigris River
are largely nonpoint in nature, it does not appear likely that
point source phosphorus control would result in any appreciable
change in the trophic condition of the lake.
-------
2. Nonpoint sources -
The total annual phosphorus load not attributable to nearby
point sources accounted for 98% of the loading reaching the
impoundment. The Verdigris River contributed 94.5%, and Walt
Creek contributed 0.4% of the total. Ungaged tributaries were
estimated to have contributed 2.5%.
2
The Verdigris River had a phosphorus export of 41 kg/km /yr.
This rate is much higher than the rates of other unimpacted
tributaries to Oologah Reservoir, or to nearby Grand Lake o1
the Cherokees.* Such inflation of background nutrient loading
is probably due to unknown point sources upstream in Kansas
rather than actual nonpoint contributions, but further inves-
tigation is needed to determine the location and significance
of these possible sources.
*See Working Paper No. 589, "Report on Grand Lake o' the Cherokees".
-------
II. LAKE AND DRAINAGE BASIN CHARACTERISTICS
Lake and drainage basin characteristics are itemized below.
Lake surface area and mean depth were provided by the Oklahoma
Department of Pollution Control; maximum depth was provided by
the Oklahoma Water Resources Board. Tributary flow data were
provided by the Oklahoma District Office of the U.S. Geological
Survey (USGS). Outlet drainage -area includes the lake surface
area. Mean hydraulic retention time was obtained by dividing
the Take volume by mean flow of the outlet. Precipitation
values are estimated by methods as outlined in National £utro-
ph teat ion Sun/ey (NES) Working Paper'No. 175. A table of metrdc/
English conversions is included as Appendix A.
A. lake Morphometry:
1. Surface area: 119..22 km2.
2. Mean depth: 5.7 meters.
3. Maximum depth: 24..4 meters.
4. Volume: 679.554 x 10^ m3.
5. 'Mean hydraulic retention time: TD9 days.
-------
B. Tributary and Outlet:
(See Appendix B for flow data)
1. Tributaries -
Drainage Mean flow
Name area(km2) (m3/sec)
A-2 Verdigris River 9,585.6 62,50
C-l Wolf Creek 238.0 1.33
Minor tributaries and
immediate drainage - 1.294.9 7.91
Totals 11,118.5 71.74
2. Outlet - A-l Verdigris River 11,237.7 72.21
C. Precipitation:
1. Year of sampling: 129.4 cm.
2. Mean annual: 99.4 cm.
-------
III. LAKE WATER QUALITY SUMMARY
Oologah Reservoir was sampled four times during the open-
water season of 1974 by means of a pontoon-equipped Huey heli-
copter. Each time, samples for physical and chemical parameters
were collected from ten stations on the lake* and from one or
more depths at each station (see map, page v). During each
visit, depth-integrated samples were collected from each station
for chlorophyll ^analysis and phytoplankton identification and
enumeration. During the first and last visits, 18.9-liter depth-
integrated samples were composited for algal assays. Maximum
depths (expressed in meters) sampled are listed below:
Station Number Maximum Depth
01 21.6
02 12.2
03 9.1
04 9.1
05 1.5
06 6.7
07 10.7
08 12.2
09 9.4
10 2.4
The results obtained are presented in full in Appendix C and
are summarized in III-A for waters at the surface and at the maxi-
mum depth for each site. Results of the phytoplankton counts and
chlorophyll ^determinations are included in III-B. Results of
the limiting nutrient study are presented in III-C.
*At the June sampling, Station 07 replaced Station 06, 08 replaced
03, 09 replaced 04, and 10 replaced 05.
-------
OOL'JGAri LtftS.
STOPET COME 4T.12
( 4/ 2/7* )
PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS
( fc/13/74 )
( 8/29/7* )
PA«-ETfe.
TtMP£HATUJE (DtG
0.-1.5 * OE°Trl
MAX L>EPTH«»
DISSOLVED OXYGEN
O.-l.S M DEPTH
M£X DEPTH0*
N>
CENT)
6
(MG/Ll
b
CONDUCTIVITY (U«HOS)
0.-1.5 M LiEPTri 12
"AX uEPTtio* b
PH (STANOtMO UNIT
O.-l.S * OEPTH
MAX DEPTH»«
TOTAL ALKALINITY
O.-l.? M DE.WTH
MAX OEPTh»«
TOTAL P (MG/L1
O.-l.S M OEr'Th
MAX UEPTrl»»
DISSOLVED U*THO P
O.-l.S M DEPTH
MAX DEPTH«»
N02»NO'J MG/L)
0.-1.5 M OEPTH
MAX DfCPTHoe
AMMONIA (MG/Ll
MAX DEPTH**0
KJfLtJttHL N (MG/L)
0.-1.5 M DE»TH
MAX OtPTh««
5)
12
b
IMG/L)
12
b
12
6
(MG/D
12
6
12
b
12
6
b
11.5-
8.8-
. 8.4-
10.-
157.-
7.4-
7.3-
67.-
bb.-
0.055-0
0.004-0
0.01S-0
O.OH-0
0.4bO-0
O.*60-0
0.060-0
0.070-0
3.400-0
0.500-0
s««°
14.0
14.0
9.6
9.8
514.
308.
7.7
7.5
95.
94.
.119
.119
.061
.053
.550
.550
.160
.170
.900
.800
= 6
MEDIAN
11.7
11.6
9.4
112.
202.
7.b
7.4
81.
79.
0.099
0.091
0.051
0.04b
0.500
0.490
0.150
0.140
0.750
0.700
MAX
jEPTn b°«°
(METERS)
0.0-
1.5-
1.5-
1.5-
0.0-
1.5-
0.0-
1.5-
0.0-
1.5-
0.0-
1.5-
0.0-
1.5-
0.0-
Ub-
0.0-
1.5-
0.0-
1.5-
1.5
21.3
1.5
21.3
1.5
21.3
1.5
21.3
US
21.3
1.5
21.3
1.5
21.3
1.5
21.3
U-J
21.3
1.5
21.3
N<*
11
6
5
6
11
b
11
6
11
b
11
6
11
6
11
6
11
b
11
6
RANGE
21.9- 24.1
21.7- 23.1
b.b- 7.2
5.3- 6.8
219.- 391.
222.- 417.
6.6- 8.1
6.9- 8.0
84.- 134.
79.- 164.
0.048-0.196
O.OS9-U.219
0.030-0.048
0.031-0.057
0.630-0.830
0.660-0.790
0.030-0.130
0.030-0.140
0.200-0.700
0. 200-0. bOO
= (-.
ME01 AN
23.4
22.6
7.2
5.5
342.
316.
7.7
7.4
117.
116.
0.087
0.117
0.039
0.035
0.710
0.715
0.040
0.080
0.500
0.400
MAX
DEPTH
(METERS) N«
0.0-
2.4-
Ub-
2.4-
0.0-
2.4-
0.0-
2.4-
0.0-
2.4-
0.0-
2.4-
0.0-
2.4-
0.0-
2.4-
0.0-
2.4-
0.0-
2.4-
1.5
21.6
1.5
21.6
1.5
21.6
1.5
21.6
US
21.6
US
21.6
US
2Ub
1.5
21.6
Ub
21.6
1.5
21.6
6
6
6
b
b
6
6
b
b
6
5
6
6
6
6
6
6
$ooa
SANGE
2b.O- 26, 8
24.7- 25.5
5.2- 6.4
0.4- 6.2
309.- 356.
335.- 377.
7.7- 8.0
7.6- 7.9
lib.- 132.
120.- 132.
0.038-0.185
0.044-0.110
0.006-0.030
0.013-0.031
0.210-0.390
0.030-0.140
0.1)30-0.100
0.400-1.200
0.200-0.600
= 6
MEDIAN
25.0
25.1
6.0
4.6
332.
341.
7.9
7.7
122.
124.
0.056
0.060
0.014
0.017
0.280
0.330
0.060
0.055
0.60U
0.400
MAX
DEPTH
(METt»S)
0.0- 0.0
2.4- 18.3
0.0- 0.0
2.4- 18. J
0.0- 0.0
2.4- 18.3
0.0- 0.0
2.4- Id.j
0.0- 0.0
2.4- 18.3
0.0- 0.0
.2.4- 18.3
0.0- O.U
2.4- 18.3
0.0- 0.0
2.4- 18.3
0.0- 0.0
2.4- 18.3
0.0- 0.0
2.4- 18.3
SECCHI DISC
0.2- 0.3
0.1- 0.7
0.3
0.3- 0.9
O.b
* N = NO. OF SAMPLES
«» MAXIMUM OEKTH SAMPLED AT EACH SITE
»»» S = NO. OF SlltS SAMPLED ON THIS DATE
-------
GOLCGAH LAKE
STO^ET CODE 4T12
PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS
( 10/21/74 )
S*«* = * OEPTI-
HANGE MEDIAN ("ETErtS)
(CiEo CENT)
O.-l.1? ^ DEPTH 11
M A X J E P T H * * b
DISSULVEu OXYGEN (MO/L)
0.-1.5 f DtfTH 11
MA* DEPTH** 6
CONDUCTIVITY (UWHO*)
0.-1.5 M OEPTH 11
MA* DEPTH** 6
PH (STANDARD UNlTb)
O.-l.S M DEPTH 11
MAX DEPTH** 6
TOTAL ALKALINITY (MG/L)
0.-1.5 M OEpfH 11
MAX DEPTH** 6
TOTAL P (MG/L)
O.-l.S M DEPTH 11
MAX DF.PTH** b
DISSOLVED OHTHO P (MG/L)
0.-1.5 M DE^TH 11
MAX DEPTH** 6
17.0- 17.9
17.0- 17.8
17.8 0.0- 1.5
17.2 0.0- 19.8.
8.2- 9.4 «.b 0.0- 1.5
4.8- 9.0 8.7 0.0- 19.d
282.- 302. 294. 0.0- 1.5
282.- 431. 297. 0.0- 19.6
7.6- 8.2 7.9 O.Ot- 1.5
7.3- 8.U 7.9 0,0*. 19.8
104.- 113. 107. 0.0^ 1.5
100.- 111. 106. O.Oi- 19.a
0.037-0.129 0.052 0.0- 1.5
0.034-0.129 0.054 0.0- 19.8
0.009-0.036 0.021 O.OT 1.5
0.008-0.036 u.Olb 0,0- 19.8
0.-1.5 v OtPTh
MAX DEPTH**
AMMONIA (MG/L)
0.-!.=•. v HEHTH
MAX DEPTH**
KJELDAHL xi (MG/L)
O.-lo M HE^TH
MAX OEPTH**
SECCHI DISC
11 0.360-0.500 0.480 O.O'!- 1,5
6 0.300-0,500 0.46b 0.0- 19.b
11 0.020-0.07u 0,020 0.0-? 1.3
h 0.020-0.070 0.0?Q 0.0- 19.6
11 0.300-0,600 0.4QO 0.0- l.b
6 0,200-0.700 0.350 0.0- 19.6
0.2- 0.7
O.b
* N = NO. OF SAMPLES
*« MAXIMUM DEHTH SAMPLED AT EACH blTE
**» s = NO. OK SITES SAMPLED ON THIS DATE
-------
B. Biological Characteristics:
1. Phytoplankton -
Sampling
Date
04/02/74
06/13/74
08/28,29/74
10/21/74
Dominant
Genera
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1.
2.
3.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Chroomonas
Chryptomonas
Melosira"
Dactylocbccopsis
Skeletonema
Other genera
Total
Melosira
Nitzschia
Scenedesmus
Other genera
Total
Melosira
Cryptomonas
Stephanodiscus
Chroomonas
Skeletonema
Other genera
Total
Chroomonas
Cyclotella
Cryptomonas
Melosira
Skeletonema
Other genera
total
Algal
Units
per ml
494
380
228
76
76
39
1,293
86
86
29
201
567
177
142
71
71
142
1,170
3,783
408
190
163
163
327
5,034
-------
2. Chlorophyll a -
Sampling
Date
04/02/74
06/13/74
Station
Number
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
Chlorophyll a_
1.7
1.6
2.0
1.2
4.5
15.1
0.3
1.5
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.5
Sampling
Date
08/29/74
10/21/74
Station
Number
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
Chlorophyll
(uq/1)
1.4
4.1
10.5
7.2
7.4
8.0
3.0
8.8
13.8
6.8
7.1
15.5
-------
11
C. Limiting Nutrient Study:
1. Autoclaved, filtered, and nutrient spiked
Ortho P
Spike(mg/1) Cone.(mg/1)
04/04/74 - Stations 01-03
Inorganic N
Cone.(mg/1)
a.
Control
0.05 P
0.05 P + 1.0 N
1.00 N
Control
0.05 P
0.05 P +
1.00 N
1.0 N
0.035 0.610
0.085 0.610
0.085 1.610
0,035 1.610
Stations 04-06
0.015 0.549
0.065 0.549
0.065 1.549
0.015 1.549
b. 10/21/74 - Stations 01,02,07
Control
0.05 P
0.05 P +
1.00 N
1.0 N
0.025
0.075
0.075
0.025
0.439
0.439
1,439
1.439
Maximum Yield
(mg/1-dry wt.)
13.4
18.4
32.9
11.1
6.0
14.7
24.0
7.5
1.8
12.8
20.3
1.4
-------
12
2: Discussion -
The control yields of the assay alga, Selenastrum capri-
cornutum, indicate that the potential primary productivity in
Oologah Reservoir was high at the times assay samples were
collected (04/02/74, 10/21/74). Highly turbid lake conditions
severely restricted light penetration and are the likely reason
that chlorophyll a^ values noted (page 10) did not reflect the
high yield potential noted under assay conditions where light
limitation is not a factor. There was a significant increase
in yield over that of the control when orthophosphorus was
added but a lack of yield response when nitrogen alone was
1 added. The maximum increase in yield over that of the control
was achieved with the simultaneous addition of both nutrients.
Based on these results, phosphorus limitation is indicated.
The mean inorganic nitrogen to orthophosphorus ratios (N/P)
in the lake data were 14/1 or greater on all sampling occasions,
further suggesting primary limitation by phosphorus (a mean
N/P ratio of 14/1 or greater generally indicates phosphorus
limitation).
-------
13
IV. NUTRIENT LOADINGS
(See Appendix D for data)
For the determination of nutrient loadings, the Oklahoma
National Guard collected monthly near-surface grab samples from
each of the tributary sites indicated on the map (page v). Sam-
pling was begun in November 1974, and was completed in September
1975.
Through an interagency agreement, stream flow estimates for
the year of sampling and a "normalized" or average year were pro-
vided by the Oklahoma District Office of the USGS for the tribu-
tary sites nearest the lake.
In this report, nutrient loads for sampled tributaries were
determined by using a modification of a USGS computer program for
calculating stream loadings. Nutrient loads indicated for tribu-
taries are those measured minus known point source loads, if any.
Nutrient loadings for unsampled "minor tributaries and imme-
diate drainage" ("II" of USGS) were estimated by using the mean
annual nutrient loads, in kg/km2/yr, in Wolf Creek at Station C-l ,
and multiplying the means by the II area in km2.
The operators of the Delaware and Nowata wastewater treat-
ment plants provided monthly effluent samples and corresponding
flow data.
-------
14"
A. VJaste Sources:
1. Known municipal -
Name
Delaware
Nowata
Pop.*
Served
510
3,500
Mean Flow Receiving
Treatment* (m3/d x 103) Water
Stabilization 0.108
pond
Trickling 1.813
filter
Verdigris
River
Western Branch/
Verdigris
River
2. Known industrial -
Name
Peabody
Coal #1
Peabody
Coal #2
Product
Coal
Coal
Treatment**
None
Settling
basin
Mean Flow**
(m3/d x 103)
0.189
0.189
Receiving
Water**
Madden Creek
Spencer Creek
*Treatment plant questionnaires.
**0klahoma Department of Pollution Control, 1976.
-------
15
B. Annual Total Phosphorus Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
% of
Source kg P/yr total
a. Tributaries (nonpoint load) -
A-2 Verdigris River 388,860 94.5
C-l Wolf Creek 1,810 0.4
b. Minor tributaries and immediate
drainage (nonpoint load) - 10,360 2.5
c. Known municipal STP's -
Delaware 75 <0.1
Nowata 8,255 2.0
d. Septic tanks* - 15 <0.1
e. Known industrial -
Peabody Coal #1 Unknown —
Peabody Coal #2 Unknown —
f. Direct precipitation** - 2,085 0.5
Totals 411,460 100.0
2. Output - A-l Verdigris River 159,885
3. Net annual P accumulation - 251,575
*Estimate based on 35 lakeshore residences and 4 parks.
**Estimated (see NES Working Paper No. 175).
-------
16
C. Annual Total Nitrogen Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
% of
Source kg N/yr total
a. Tributaries (nonpoint load) -
A-2 Verdigris River 3,791,695 89,5
C-l Wolf Creek 46,190 1.1
b. Minor tributaries and immediate
drainage (nonpoint load) - 251,210 5.9
c. Known municipal STP's -
Delaware 315 <0.1
Nowata 19,580 0.5
d. Septic tanks* - 515 <0.1
e. Known industrial-
Peabody Coal #1 Unknown —
Peabody Coal #2 Unknown
f. Direct precipitation** - 128.710 3.0
Totals 4,238,215 100.0
2. Output - A-l Verdigris River 3,743,220
3. Net annual N accumulation - 494,995
*Estimate based on 35 lakeshore residences and 4 parks.
**Estimated (see NES Working Paper No. 175).
-------
17
Mean Annual Nonpoint Nutrient Export by Subdrainage Area;
Tributary kg P/km2/yr kg N/km2/yr
Verdigris River
Wolf Creek
41
8
Mean Nutrient Concentrations in Ungaged Streams
Tributary
Mean Total P
(mg/1)
B-l Panther Creek
D-2 Brush Creek
E-l Big Creek
F-l East Fork Big Creek
G-l Morman Creek
0.056
0.044
0.083
0.040
0.048
396
194
Mean Total N
(mg/1)
1.328
1.296
1.416
1.303
1.396
-------
18
F. Yearly Loadings:
In the following table, the existing phosphorus annual loading
is compared to the relationship proposed by Vollenweider (1975),
Essentially, his "eutrophic" loading is that at which the receiving
waters would become eutrophic or remain eutrophic; his "oligotrophic"
loading is that which would result in the receiving water remaining
oligotrophic or becoming oligotrophic if morphometry permitted. A
"mesotrophic" loading would be considered one between "eutrophic" or
"oligotrophic".
Note that Vollenweider's model may not be applicable to water
bodies with very short retention times or in which light penetration
is severely restricted from high concentrations of suspended solids
in the surface waters.
Total Yearly
Phosphorus Loading
(g/m2/yr)
Estimated loading for Oologah Reservoir 3.45
Vollenweider's "eutrophic" loading 0.83
Vollenweider's "oligotrophic" loading 0.42
-------
19
V. LITERATURE REVIEWED
Oklahoma Department of Pollution Control. 1976. Water Quality
Management Plan, Middle Arkansas River Basin. Oklahoma City,
Oklahoma.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1975. National Eutro-
phication Survey Methods 1973-1976. Uorking Paper No, 175.
National Environmental Research Center, Las Vegas, Nevada,
and Pacific Northwest Environmental Research Laboratory,
Corvallis, Oregon.
Vollenweider, R. A. 1975. Input-Output Models With Special
Reference to the Phosphorus Loading Concept in Limnology.
Schweiz. Z. Hydrol. 37:53-84.
-------
20
VI. APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
CONVERSION FACTORS
-------
CONVERSION FACTORS
Hectares x 2.471 = acres
Kilometers x 0.6214 - miles
Meters x 3.201 = feet
Cubic meters x 8.107 x 10~ - acre/feet
Square kilometers x 0.38G1 - square miles
Cubic motors/sec x 35.315 = cubic feet/sec
Centinu.'ters x 0.3937 :r inches
KiloQroiM'., x 2.2C5 ~ pounds
Kilograms/square kilometer x 5.711 - Ibs/squaro rrilc
-------
APPENDIX B
TRIBUTARY FLOW DATA
-------
TRIBUTARY FLO* INFORMATION FOR OKLAHOMA
LAKE COOE 401? OOLOGAh LAKE
TOTAL OxAl'-iAGE AREA OK LAr\t(SQ KM) 11537.7
•J 3/25/7 7
TRIBUTARY AR.-A(S'v K1-',)
JAM
MAf
NURMALI2EO FLOWS(CMS)
JUN JUL AuG
SLP
ocr
4012A1
<»0 12«2
4012C1
«0 1222
11237.7
95*5.6
236.0
141^.1
31. 43
27.47
O.6.;
3.66
36.53
30.87
0.91
5.33
73.62
66.54
1.??
7.;.8
143.00
129.12
2.24
13.31
144.98
117.51
4.1*
24.V2
147.25 111.57 30.67 52.10 55.22
111.57 107.32
d.07 1.05
12.46 6.23
SUMMARY
19.5-+ 47.*&
0.48 O.od
2.63 5.36
49.84
0.96
5.6b
NOV DEC
26.03 21.24 72.21
23.50 17.o4 02.50
0.76 0.59 1.33
4.53 3*40 7.91
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA OF LAKE =
SUM OF SUB-DRAINAGE AREAS =
11237.7
11237.7
TOTAL FLO* IN =
TOTAL FLOW OUT =
859.61
865.65
MEAN MONTHLY FLOrtS AND DAILY FLOWS(CMS)
TRIBUTARY MONTH YEA" MEAN FLO'V DAY
4012A1
FLO* DAY
FLOW DAY
FLOW
4012A2
11
le
i
c.
3
4
5
6
7
8
q
10
11
12
1
?
3
4
5
6
7
6
Q
10
74
74
7S
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
421.071
211.810
184.060
212.376
214.075
209.545
42.475
275.240
78.154
1.501
3.964
1.9R2
444.574
99.109
92.879
137.62')
175.281
97.693
70.226
237.862
12.79Q
18.576
4.078
1.557
2
15
19
16
16
19
29
28
29
2
14
18
15
16
20
13
59.749
206.713
166.786
183.493
171.034
163.955
2.067
0.595
0.0
603.149
161.689
4S.3V7
215.774
168.485
41.059
58.333
-------
FLO* INFO-WATIO.M FOK OKLAHOMA
U3/25/77
LAKE COOS 401? OOLOGih LAKE
MEAN MONTHLY FLO«S A.\0 JAILY
TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAK MEAN FLOw :")AY
9.9U 2
1.699 !<•
1.699 17
4012^
11
12
1
-»
C
3
u
5
6
7
fl
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
u
5
6
7
ft
9
10
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
7<*
7<»
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
GAY
FLOW DAY
FLOW
3.631
1 .416
1.133
0.283
0.340
0.085
0.028
70.79?
16.141
15.008
33.980
28.317
15.857
16
20
13
1.982
O.SbO
1.416
1 .133
1.699
0.566
36.81?
1.982
2.£32
0.566
0.2R3
-------
APPENDIX C
PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL DATA
-------
RETRIEVAL OATE 77/OJ/24
401201
36 25 23.0 C95 40 41.0 3
COLOGAH LARE
40131 OKLAHOMA
100391
11EPALES 04001002
0075 FEET DEHTn CLASS 00
ooo io
DATE
FROM
to
74/04/0?
74/06/13
74/08/29
74/10/21
TIME
OF
DAY
10
10
15
10
io
10
12
12
12
12
12
12
09
09
69
t)9
09
09
09
09
09
69
09
30
30
3"6
30
30
30
45
45
4*5
45
45
45
?6
20
>6
20
26
25
?5
?5
25
25
?5
DEPfM
FEEt
OOJO
0005
oois
6630
6050
0670
0000
0005
6615
6036
0050
007l
0066
0015
0035
6650
0060
0060
0005
0615
0030
0045
0065
*-ATEP
TEMP
CEKlT
11*5
11*6
ius
iuo
il.o
iuo
2-+.0
23*2
23*1
23*1
23 «0
23*0
25*9
25»9
25.8
25*6
25*4
17.8
17*6
17*8
17*8
17.8
17.8
00300
DO
MG/L
9*6
9*2
9*7
9)2
7*2
7.0
7*4
7*6
6.8
5*2
5.2
5,2
3.2
2.2
8*2
8*2
8*2
8.2
8.2
8.2
en 077 6oo-j4
TKANSP C'MXiCTvr
SECCHI FIELO
INCHES MiCROMHQ
8 49
42
119
185
212
26 381
373
374
376
378
378
22 369
312
313
375
377
25 302
299
366
300
301
302
00400
SU
7.5C
7*^0
7.40
7*40
7.40
7*JO
7!70
7*7o
7*96
7e80
7.60
7*60
7.-96
7.90
7*80
7*70
7*78
7*90
7*92
7.94
7.93
7*7a
00410
T ALK
CAC03
Mu/L
79
78
78
77
76
78
134
131
137
146
132
134
122
122
123
121
122
i 13
iiz
109
109
109
111
00610
NH3-N
totAL
MC./L
0.130
0.160
0*160
0.160
0*150
0.140
0*050
0*030
0.030
0.040
0.040
0*030
0.030
0*020K
6.020K
0»020K
0*030
0*030
0.020K
6.020K
0.020K
0.020K
0*020K
00625
rot KJEL
N
MG/L
0.600
0*400
0.500
0.500
0.400
0.500
0*500
0.200
0.200
0*266
0*200
0.200
0*500
0*400
0.300
6*300
0.400
0*800
0*400
0.300
6*500
0*366
0*300
00630
N02SNU3
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.550
0.550
0*550
0*540
U.550
0.540
0*630
Os650
0*640
6*680
0*660
0.660
0*380
0.400
0*420
0«460
0*460
0.500
0.440
0*430
0*430
0.430
0*430
00671
PHOb-UIS
OKTHO
MG/L P
6*052
0*057
0.058
0.058
0*058
0*053
0*dJ9
0.035
0.035
0*034
0*033
0.034
0*022
Oi026
0*019
0.023
0*022
6*025
6*021
0.018
0*016
0*015
K VJLUE I^MOWN ru 8^:
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STOSET RETRIEVAL DATE 77/03/24
H01201
3o 25 33.0 0=<
COLJoAH LAr, £
•*01J1 CKL.A-OMA
40 -1.0 3
1C03V1
U002
CO 66 5
DATE TI^E DF.PT-i o-iOS-TJT
FSON- OF
TO JAY FEET MG/L P
74/04/0?
7<«/Ofc/ 13
74/08/29
74/10/21
10
10
1U
10
10
10
12
12
12
12
1?
12
12
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
OQ
09
09
30 0000
30 0005
30 0015
30 0030
30 0050
30 0070
45 0000
45 0005
45 OOUb
45 0015
45 0030
45 0050
45 0071
20 0000
?0 0015
?0 0035
?0 0350
?0 0060
?5 0000
?5 0004
25 0005
?S 0009
?5 0015
?5 0030
?5 0045
?5 0065
, .099
I .099
0.097
0.09^
•J.100
0.046
0.050
0.052
0.053
0.05'.
C.059
0.057
C. 01 *J
n.o6o
u . u 0 7
0.098
0.051
i.037
...037
0 .034
32217
CnLRPHYL
A
•JG/L
1.7
"J.3
00031
INCf:T LT
PC MMNti
PERCENT
1.4
3.0
1.0
5.0
1.0
0.034
-------
OAT-: 77/^3/24
FPO"
74/l>4/02
74/Jti/ 1 1
74/08/28
74/10/21
Tivc Cf.PTi /.-TEP
OF TE>M
DAY FEET CENT
10
10
10
10
10
13
13
13
13
13
15
15
15
15
10
10
10
10
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
?0
20
10
10
10
10
20
20
?0
20
0000
0005
0015
0030
0040
0000
0005
0015
0030
0040
0000
0015
0023
0029
0000
0005
0015
0031
n
11
11
11
11
24
23
23
23
22
25
25
25
25
17
17
17
17
t
•
•
•
•
•
.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
c.
-J
5
5
<4
I
9
0
I
8
1
9
7
3
a
8
n
8
00300
00
^G/L
9.
9.
9.
9.
7.
7.
6.
5.
6.
6.
6.
4.
9.
8.
9.
9.
2
a
4
8
?
4
6
6
0
0
0
2
J
*
0
0
00077
19
36
29
401202
36 27 00.0 095 37 24.0 3
oOLO'jAM LAKE
40131 OKLAHOMA
100391
IIE^ALES
000 *4
C-NuUCT v f
F IELD
MIC^OMHG
76
78
165
173
191
379
377
375
375
417
324
326
329
340
302
301
302
316
004'
00400
i-ri
SO
7.5o
7.5o
7. 50
7.50
7.40
7.70
8*00
6.00
7.90
7.80
7.70
7* 7c
7.65
7.60
a. 01
8.06
8*17
7.9fa
U4QO
* FEET DEPTH CLASS
00410
T AL*
CAC03
Mo/L
78
79
79
81
79
131
131
149
137
164
120
117
118
120
113
112
111
110
00610
INH j-fj
TOTAL
Mu/L
0.150
0.150
0.130
0.150
0.140
0.040
0.040
0.040
0*040
0.050
0.060
0.04Q
0*090
0.050
0.020K
0.020
0.020K
0.020K
1002
00
00625
TOT *JEL
t,
Mb/L
0.500
0.400
0.400
0.400
0.500
0.300
0.200
0.200
0*200
0.200
0.4QO
0.200
0*300
0.200
0*600
0.400
0.200
0.200
00030
NU2bNOJ
N-TGTAL
MO/u
0*550
0.550
0.540
0.570
0.550
0.670
0.670
0.680
0.660
0.700
0.390
0.380
0.400
0*430
0.370
0.360
0.360
0.380
00671
PHOS-OIS
OP.THO
MG/L P
0.055
0.053
0.052
0.051
0*046
0.032
0.030
0.031
0.031
0.031
0*014
0.010
0.010
0.018
0.009
0.009
0.009
0*009
K VALUE K'
LESS THAN
fO t)
-------
bTO=ET
v it
DATE
TO
74/?!)/ 1
7^/08/28
OP"
FEET
"C-/L t-
10
10
10
10
10
13
13
13
13
13
n
13
15
15
15
15
10
10
10
10
'0
?0
?0
?0
?0
?0
?0
?0
?0
?0
?0
'0
10
10
10
10
?0
20
?0
^0
coco
ooos
0015
0030
0040
0003
0001
0005
0006
0015
0039
0040
0000
0015
0023
0023
0000
0005
0015
0031
•j .OS)?
f > . 0- v
'' . 0 T> 1
C.090
C-.0*2
J.05J
? .05.)
y .oss
C- .055
j . 0 6 3
:> . 0 4 3
0.039
•u .040
•5.053
. . 0 H ^^
u.037
C . 0 4 u
i ,0«»?
•*01202
35 27 00.0 OS5 37 2".0 3
UJL-JuAd i_Ai\L
"0 1 j 1 OM.a-.Jvi
1003^1
0 4 U 0 1 0 0 2
CLA^S i..o
32217
LP3r'L
A
UO/L
1.6
1.5
•" C 3 1
' T t_ T
. IM-
C E N T
H.rt
-------
77/'.'3/.>'
0 '.) 0 1 C
04 Tt
FSO'-'
TO
VO^f
GATE
FROM
TO
V04/C
TI^E ;E-T-
(IF
u4Y FEET
12 11 IS 000 J
11 lc 100-3
11 15 0015
11 15 0030
TIME OtyTn
OF
DAY FEET
1? 11 15 0000
11 15 0305
11 15 00 IS
11 1*. CO 30
i. ~ll.fi
ff1. 'f
CENT
1 1 .5
1 1 .3
11. S
9.5
•JO 665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L ^
u. Ill
0.103
i>. IOC
o.o^a
00300
••1G/L
b.8
8.4
32217
'-' "077 000.9**
T-:.'-.S'5 C,Oi'CT/Y
st'coi FIELD
l^C-'ES MiC-^OMrtO
8 514
105
123
172
CC031
INGOT LT
401203
36 32 59.0 095 37 59.0 3
.0131 UM.AIUMA
1 It^ALtS C^OO
0 .;<.<. FEET OE-T-i LLAsS
00400 OOMO 00610
r-n 1 ALT, NI-.J-'-.
CAC03 TOTiL
Su MG/L Mo/L
7.50 70 0.160
7.50 67 0.160
7.45 68 0.160
7.3C 65 0.170
100391
1002
00
00625
MG/L
0.800
O.rtOO
0.800
0.800
A
OG/L
2.0
00o30
00671
iM-TOTAL Ot^T-tO
Mb/L MG/L -1
0.061
O.ObJ
0.058
0.047
0.^90
0.500
0.460
-------
/T
Tl'-'f •lf.°T-
OF
uir FE£f
COO I 3
CtMT
)P 14 TO OOCO 11
i •* •> 1 0 0 u •a 11
1 -4 •:; r> 0 0 1 -3 ll
1* 00 OOJJ 1 l
0'.;o-5~
f 0 r-1 i'o^ C iL'uC fv r
•=t-!>I KIEL:)
-T-/L r.c-ts ••i;c-j^nu
t- I 36
102
236
->6 33
H ..' i J i
Oo-iv
400
u
7 . c 0
7.5C
7.4J
53. C 0-:S
0 '\ L J - ^ '•
i.S
00-10
CAC03
MG/L
33
80
79
35 "3.0 3
•'A
0-»GC
00610
N I~" j ~ i J
TOTAL
Mij/L
0. 160
0 . 1 6 0
0. 140
1003*1
1002
OJ
00625
10T *vj£L
Mb/L
0.900
0.700
0.700
0.700
00^30
\ 0 ^ ^ ' i O 3
N •• T u T AL_
Mu/U
0.460
U .HdO
O.<*^0
0.470
00671
ORTnu
0.050
0 .04b
0.04^
O.U46
DflTE
0<)h65
TIME DEPTH PHOb-TOT
OF
TO OA> FE£T MG/L f>
74/04/0
-------
CATF 77/03/
-------
STO^ET RETRIEVAL HATE 77/03/28
36 31 19.0 0=55 33 JH.O 3
OOLJOAn LAr\£'
<*01J1
100391
r A AM,
DATE
FROM
TO
74/04/02
DATE
FROM
TO .
74/04/02
L A 'N i
TI>"E DEPTH
OF
•JAY FEET
15 00 0000
15 00 0005
15 00 OOlb
15 00 0022
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
15 CO 0000
15 00 0005
15 00 0015
15 00 0022
iCOlO
*ATER
TL "IP
CENT
13. S
13.6
13. b
13.5
00665
PMOS-TOT
MG/L P
I-. 055
0.065
0.059
0.004
00300
DO
•"IG/L
^.^
7.2
9.2
32217
CnLPPHYL
A
UG/L
15.1
01077 000^
THaixiSP C'-jOUCTVr
SECCHI F1ELO
INChtS MK-^OMnO
12 1^8
235
288
306
OOC31
INCUT LT
SEMNING
PERCENT
I lE'-'ALES 0^00
oo?b FEET JEPT^ C^ASS
00^00 00410 00f>10
Ph T A|_r<, NhJ-N
CAC03 TOTAL
SU Mu/L Mu/L
7.70 85 0.080
7. 70 85 O.ObO
7.6J 85 0.070
7.55 83 0.070
1002
00
00625 00630
TOT rtJEL •NG2s>'vU3
N N- TOTAL
MG/L MG/L
0.900 O.blO
0.800 0.500
0.800 0.500
o.eoo 0.510
00671
PiOS-Jli
Of
-------
STOSET
DATE 77/o3/28
DATE
ro
"E DEPTH
< FEET
74A,6/13 13 50 0000
13 50 0005
13 50 0015
13 50 0032
74/08/28 14 15 0000
14 15 0015
14 15 0020
14 15 0025
14 15 0030
14 15 0035
74/lu/21 10
-------
5TGRET RETRIEVAL I«TE 77/o3/.-16
/T
401207
36 30 52.0 095 3* 25.0 3
UGLOGAH LAivfc:
40 1 51 OSLA-iUMA
100391
IIE^LES
003o FEET
0*001002
-i CLASS uO
DAT-E
r^ov
TO
7^/06/13
74/03/CH
7^/10/21
00
TIME DEPTrt ?,HOS
OF
UAY FEET
13
13
13
13
13
14
U
14
14
14
14
10
10
10
10
10
50
SO
50
50
50
15
15
15
15
15
15
55
55
55
^5
55
0000
0005
0015
0025
0032
0000
0015
0020
002S
0030
0035
0000
0005
0009
0015
0030
665 32217 00031
-TOT C.-ILSPH.YL INCOT LT
A REINING
MG/L r>
i)
^
i
0
0
.1
*,'
0
il
.1
ft
j
0
0
0
.087
.0-)5
.087
.Oe4
.058
.037
.0*n
.043
.047
.110
.059
.054
.04^
.Obi
JO/L PERCENT
C.5
50.0
1.0
10.5
13.8
5.0
1.0
-------
'JATF 77/C3/26
DATE
FROM
TO
74/06/13
74/08/28
74/10/21
TT-
-------
STORE! >
-------
STO^ET -IFVAl. TATE 77/03/26
401209
36 33 48.0 095 35 36.0 3
OGLOGAri LAKE
4C131 OKLA-iOMA
100391
04001002
0035 FEET OEPTn CLASS 00
DATE
TO
74/06/13
74/00/28
74/10/21
00010
TIME DEPTH WATER
OF TEMP
DAY FEET
14
14
14
14
11
11
11
14
14
14
1*
4?
45
45
45
45
45
45
10
10
10
in
0000
0005
0015
0031
0000
0015
0025
0000
0005
0015
0024
CENT
23.4
21.9
21.8
21.7
25.0
25.0
25.0
17,4
17.2
17.1
17,1
00300 00077 00094
DO TPiNSP .C'-iDUCTvr
SECCH! FItLD
00400 00410
PH T ALK
CAC03
*G/L INCHES MICHOMHO Sy
5.6
5.4
5.3
6.0
5.8
5.4
8.6
8.6
8.6
8.6
9 260
226
229
224
14 340
341
342
25 290
290
291
291
7. 30
7.30
7.20
7.20
7.80
7.80
7,75
8.05
7.92
8.02
7.93
MG/L
107
84
ai
79
128
126
125
107
107
107
106
C0610 00625 00630 00671
Nci3-N TOT KJEL N02e><\03 P.-lOS-uIS
TOTAL N N-TUTAL OSTHO
MG/L
0.120
0.070
0.100
0.110
0.060
0.060
0.050
0.030
0.020
0.020
0.020
MG/L
0.500
0.500
0.400
0.500
0.700
0.500
0.400
0.600
0.4QO
0.400
0.400
Ml>/L
O.*30
0.710
0.670
0.730
0.270
0.280
0.300
O.<«90
0.500
0.500
0.500
MG/L P
0.039
0.039
0.040
0.041
0.023
0.015
0.015
0.023
0.021
0.019
0.020
-------
STOHET RETRIEVAL DATE 77/03/26
C0665 32217 00031
DATE TIME DEPTH PHOS-TOT OLBPnrl INCDT LT
r-iOii OF A KEENING
TJ L>AY FEET M(J/|_ P JG/L
74/06/13 14 45 0000 0.127 0.4
14 45 0001 1.0
14 45 0005 0.161
14 45 0015 0.178
14 45 0031 0.193
74/08/28 11 45 0000 0.056 7.4
11 45 0015 0.046
11 45 0025 0.062
74/10/21 14 10 0000 0.060 7.1
14 10 0001 5C.O
14 10 0004 5.i)
14 10 0005 0.053
14 10 0007 1.0
14 10 0015 0.057
14 10 0024 0.061
401209
36 33 48.0 095 35 J6.0 3
OOLObAH LArvE
40131 CKLAf-iOMA
100391
HE-^LES
0035 FEET Dt^Tr
04001002
LASS 00
-------
ST03ET SETPIEvAL DATE 77/03/28
401210
36 36 30.0 095 34 10.0 4
OOLOGAn LAKfl
"0105 OKLAr-lJMfl
100391
/T f°A/ AMc
jNT/L-KE HEpALES 04001C02
001? KEET DEPTH CLASS
DATE
FROM
TO
74/06/13
74/08/28
74/10/21
DATE
FROM
ro
74/06/13
74/08/Z8
74/10/21
TJMF OEpTH
UF"
DAY FEET
15 15 0000
15 15 C008
11 15 0000
11 15 0008
14 40 0000
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
15 15 OOpO
15 15 0008
11 15 0000
11 15 0008
14 40 0000
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
22.9
22.4
25.0
24.7
17.0
00665
PHOSsTOT
MG/L P
0.196
0,219
0.185
0.058
g.129
00300
DO
MG/L
5.
5,
6.
8.
4
8
2
8
32217
CriLRPhYL
A
OG/L
0.
8.
15.
5
0
5
OT077 OOOV4
TR&NSP CMOUCTVY
SECCHI FitLO
INCHES MIC^OMHO
b 219
222
12 356
352
9 282
00031
INCDT LT
REMNINli
PERCENT
00400
PH
SO
7.3C
7.30
7.9o
7.90
7.61
00410 OOolO
T ALK NH3-;vl
CAC03 TOTAL
MG/L MG/L
67 0.130
37 0.140
132 0.100
132 0.090
105 0.070
00
00625
TOT K
N
JEL
MG/L
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
700
600
200
600
700
00630
NOi?6N03
N-TOTAL
Mb/L
0.660
O.b60
0.210
0.170
0.500
00671
PHOa-uIS
UWTHO
MG/L P
0.040
0.057
0.030
0.016
0.036
-------
APPENDIX D
TRIBUTARY AND WASTEWATER
TREATMENT PLANT DATA
-------
r 77/C3/2<»
DATE
T T-'E. OElDln Nu2\N03
00^25
TUT ISJEL
F^G" Cr N-ToTfiL N
TO
7t/ 1 1/02
7t/ 12/15
75/01/19
75/02/16
75/03/ 16
75/01/19
75/C7/29
75/06/23
75/09/29
jAi
09
1C
1^
16
09
15
11
15
09
r FEET
r.,l
?o
or.
on
30
Of)
no
10
50
MO/L
^
'.'
0
j
i:
:,
V
0
0
.-•oo
,nOO
.368
,<»79
.'•b4*
.^10
.570
.095
.230
MG/L
0.
1.
1 .
1.
1.
1.
0.
0.
900
^00
tOO
too
5SO
300
t50
SCO
0 .1 6 1 0
TOTAL
MC-/L
0.0 Ob
0.035
0.016
0.0^8
' j . 0 8 u
1 . T. 25
O.C25
.1.025
0.012
C 'i 6 J 1
"'nOS-Olb
L'h Tr|
MG/L
D.
;j •
'J •
0.
0 •
' J •
0 .
0.
i).
0
p
010
055
Ot5
032
021*
005
015
015
017
"0 7,b
0/OOLOGAH r-
0 U o C ^EET
OC6&5
MG/L
0.
0.
0,
Of
0.
0.
0.
°>
^
C50
130
090
090
050
060
030
070
36 25 20.0 0^5 25 20.0 <*
5E OF JCT n
-------
:>TJP£T
jAlr 77/03/2"
"O1242
36 49 15. C 095 33 00.0 4
O'JOO t-tET
n *CS- «V'j H 1003^1
^0 -f-^'JO 0.5 ••*! « Jr JCT A
CLAbb
04TE
FHfOv
TO
74/1 1/0?
74/12/ )->
75/C1/1P
75/02/15
75/03/ lb
75/0^/^0
75/C-6/13
n*-'
o1-"
JAY
13
10
10
OQ
1*
09
12
POt-30 00525
F DEJT-i .'iO.-jMNUJ ToT Kj^L
FEET
30
00
00
15
40
55
00
%-rOTftL N
N« j-N
TGTau
MG/L MG/L
0.?64 1
'.<4lb 2
O.t32 1
0.640 0
0.576 ?
(1 . 4 0 f 1
l! . <* y C 1
•
•
•
•
*
•
•
900
300
2CO
300
100
350
350
0.)071
OObc-3
r'nOb-T Jl
u-'Trld
MO/L .-IU/L i3
0.
c.
'J •
0.
0 .
; .
0.
090
097
144
032
070
02o
055
0
M
0
0
0
n
)
.060
.Q52
«04U
.032
.032
.025
.050
MG/L
0.
0.
0 .
0.
0.
0.
u.
J
H'JO
27o
060
100
070
120
300
-------
JATE 77/03/2
*•', 12ril
36 *E> 20.0 0«5 37 ^5.0
PANT-'E-? CWC.E".
40 ••iO»ATA CO -n r •
T/OOLOGAn REic^VUlK
2NO^Y «D b^!)G 1.0 MI N OF »(£
11EPALES O'tOOlOO'.
OOOJ FEET OEHT* CLASS 00
1003^1
OATE
F^'J"
TO
74/1 1/02
74/13/14
75/01/13
75/02/15
75/03/10
75/C4/20
75/06/13
TIMF OE-^T-
OF
UA1
11
09
09
08
08
09
14
( FT.ET
CO
?3
20
45
30
IS
10
00630 OC625
i ••iO^&N03 TuT r.jiL
N-TOTAL i\
Mb/L MG/L
A
0
0
0
0
;i
y
.136
. 120
.015
.025
.135
,015
.ObO
3.
2.
0.
0.
1.
1.
0.
coo
uOO
300
300
100
?00
850
00610
\r-l-N
TOTAL
Mfj
•|
c
0
0
0
1-
0
/L
.045
.040
.040
.024
.04P
.0?5
.035
00671 00665
'nOS"6ji rnOi-TOT
Or)TnO
MG/L P
0
0
Q
0
0
0
0
.070
,020
.010
.006
.035
.OOb
.J20
MG/L r>
0,030
O.OnO
0.010
0.030
0.160
O.U20
0.050
-------
-ET~IEVAi_ -jATE 77/J2/J"
Oift
r- ON-
TO
74/1 1/0?
74/12/14
75/01/17
75/02/15
75/04/20
7b/!.'6/13
IS VALUE
LESS TM
TI^F <
OF
DAT i
11 45
12 40
11 30
11 15
11 ^0
IS 10
INOfc'N
AN I NO
OEPT-i
FEET
•012C1
36 46 ?0.0
• J L r' C * E E ^
<+u \J*
T/OOLJ'-AH *
2Ni?.-'Y KO
OOOu F'c.£T
39 <»0.0 4
Co -M r •••^
"vOI-<
1. "t * 'jE
O^OOl
"1'- CLASS
*.Jft30
i\02s\03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
C. 136
0.200
0 . 0 b4
C. 168
O.OUb
0. lob
00625
TkjT f,j-:L
N
MG/L
2.000
1.9CO
0.400
0.3:0
C.800
O.t.50
OC610
N-iJ-N
TuTflL
Mi'j/L
C.C20
0.0<*0
0.016
O.C20
0 . 0 1 5
0.045
O671
PnOb-DIi
04THO
MG/L P
0.070
0.015
0.010
0.008K
O.OObK
0.020
00665
r'nOi-ToT
MG/L H
C.070
0.010
0.030
0.03U
O.UtAO
-------
lEvAu JAl £ 77/03/2'*
/T
A •'rtNT/c.T-T. i*.
<*012Jl
36 Sb 45.0 0^5 25 00.0
<*0 C«AIG CO n«Y Map
T/OOLOGAn ^ESE^VOI": 1003^1
2NOh'Y PO rf«OG E Ml N OF JOT *' HWY 10
0000 FEET DE^Tn CLAiS 00
•JAT£
TIM
F OE.PT-
00630
N02«.N03
F.-vjt.' OF i-TOTAL
Tu
74/1 1/0?
7«»/ 12/ 14
75/01/17
75/02/15
75/03/10
75/04/20
75/06/ 13
•JAY
15
10
11
10
11
11
11
FEET
30
36
0-1
!•=
?0
10
30
MO/L
c
0
o
0
0
(-1
0
.20^
.760
,44r
.720
.540
.1^5
.470
0062S
TOT RJCL
N
MG/L
2.400
1.600
3.300
0.200
1.350
1.150
1.000
07610
TOT
HG
C
C
3
0
C
i)
0
AL
/L
.035
.065
.048
.008
.032
.035
.055
00671
00665
PHOS-T JT
OPT HO
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
c.
p
100
020
010
OOd
02«+
010
035
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
P
C60
01^
030
130
030
060
-------
/ T f ^ - / A M H '^ T / S T 3 r. A M
T IMF
JAr FEET
1/0?
30
75/01/17 10 30
75/02/15 10 <»n
75/03/10 10 15
75/0^/20 10 30
75/06/13 10 30
36 53 20.0 0^5 25 'JO.O i.
= ^';S-" C^Ctl-.
-*u Ciil-j CO -i«r -tip
TVJOLOG4M ri£SE^vGI-<
n<*T 10 e^OTj 1 HI E \0*iTA/C-^AIG CJ Li
UE^ALEi _ OuuOlOO*
OODO f£ET Otr-fn CLASS Ou
NO
*'J —
CCMu
/?sN03
UTAL
MO/L
C. 120
C . 3 1 ?
0.126
0.268
0.272
O.C50
i. .200
00625
TuT *JEL
N
MO/L
1.400
0.700
0.550
1.200
1.70J
0.900
1.250
00610
Nnj-N
TOTAL
Mr,/L
0.025
0.010
C.012
0.016
0.06H
f. .020
5.060
00671
fV.uS-OIS
ORTnO
MO/L P
0.050
0.010
0.005
0.008K
0.0«"
0.005K
0.020
00b65
PnOi-rOT
MO/L P
0.030
0.010K
0.020
0.090
O.C30
0.050
K i/.'
LcSS
be
-------
STJ^LT
UATE 77/03/24
00630
OC610
00671
4012E1
36 i3 20.0 0^5 23
0.0
HO C"
-------
36 5j 20.0 095 22 30.0
TO
75/02/15 10
io CO i-» f « u-2
EStr'VoI-
10 6-T~ Cl-AiS 00
i IUE OE°r->
Of
UAY FF.ET
15 r-o
11 iO
10 uO
10 ?<)
1 1 00
10 55
11 01
CGt>30
,02:.V-'J
'.-TOTAL
MG/L
C.112
'.. .312
0 . 0 o d
0. 160
f. .2*6
O.ODD
0.150
0062^
TuT Kjj-IL
N
MG/L
2.500
l.^OO
0.300
0.600
1.600
0.^00
0.750
& 1610
(Nil j-N
TOTAL
Mr,/L
O.C25
?. . 0 25
0.008
c.ooe
0 . 0 2
0.050
0.010
0.0^0
0.020
0.080
TO Be.
LESS THAN
-------
Tu
75/03/10
75/06/13 15
TIME DEPT-
O"
uiY FEET
12 30
12 00
12 or
1 2 *0
12 10
15 4S
1.063U
.\OSvw3
•J-TOTAL
MG/L
C . 1 52
' . 1^^
•1.072
0. !<*<»
0.2«0
0.010
0.220
yctos
TOT KJ-.L
N
MG/L
3. 100
1.90C
0.300
0.300
1 .hOO
0.7SO
1.7SO
0-1610
N-.^-\
TUT AL
MG/L
^.02b
0.025
0.016
0.032
0.0^8
C . P 1 b
0.100
0-}67i
H-iOS-MS
'JPTHO
MG/L P
C . 0 1 5
0.005
0.008K
0.03?
0.005K
0.025
H-1231
36 -*b 15.0 095 ^ ->0 . 0 -*
M,j.-,«PN OLE-'.
HO \0,vATu CO -lAr-
T/OOL'JuAn f'c.StW v.i !•< 1003-»1
SEC " i.1 d K L' G 2 . b ''•* I i * J F J t L * « -
CQOO fLcT Jt'-Fr Ci-Abi WC
0066->
^"OS-TiJT
MG/L r>
0.060
0.010
0.010K
0 . 0 3 0
0.09u
K ViLJn ^NO'/^! TO 6£
LLSS THAN 1,'MUICATEO
-------
/ A •->0$-
Uf Tn
M'./L
0 .
| .
1.
0.
i .
c .
1.
1.
I.
1 .
2.
2.
.1
TVJ r
^ MO/L P
510
45C
300
6tO
72b
925
100
IbO
300
PdO
100
100
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
J
2
3
^
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
100
2uO
600
100
600
'•CO
2o y
300
OOo
BOO
S2b
000
700
500
r L j
^iT
1NST
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
.-, A 1 A
-
Of-'
31
T,1
£
^bj
054
0^-9
035
025
037
02P
020
016
017
016
019
01*
019
Cv ••
voi-
1 ••
50
i^o'1;.!
FLO.v
MONT
0
0
0
C
0
0
u
0
0
0
0
0
0
l-~
c,CC
•-Li-
obJ
•Jl i
-fjl'
nut
.051
.ObO
.042
.030
.03^
.029
.12?
.017
. 0 1 "i
.Old
.017
.Ols
.01*
K V«LUE ^^
LEiS THflN
-------
J6 -3 00.0 0^5 3? 30. U
J M i. ] ~
— J ' , 'J *I J " ~ V-^ • £ *-
0000100
T!'-'t jtn-
UAI FFET
75/05/0 •> 11
O ( T ) -
16 Of
75/06/11 11 i"
cj (n -
75/'jt>/ 11 Ifa 0.:-
75/06/30 11 O?
C*3 ( T) -
75/06/30 16 10
75/'"'7/21 11 Oi>
CP (T) -
75/07/21 16 0'
1 1 in
75/jll/c.M 16 "n
75/1 0/0 1 11 .'.i
O( I i-
75/10/03 16 0'-
75/10/30 U no
Ce-MT )-
75/10/30 16 O.i
75/l?/Ot) 11 Op
C'^f D-
75/1^/04 lo Cn
76/01/03 11 Qi
C'r- ( T ) ~
76/./1/0 i 16 C^
7b/^l/P>7 11 00
Cl-1 ( T ) -
7•>/>•• 1/27 16 .1"
7^.'. 2/2 3 11 >V;
CP(T)-
/23 16 CM"!
)t.30 -106"'- ;.. -61',
•\ .0 j Ti.. I ^ JLL
•_T,VL N i.,lM
'O/L MC-/L .--V./L
?. 1 jO
o:67i
" 0 i - j I:
jjQ'.' i- Lc i • Jf ^ 1 •-
Ou6b5 50051
r i_'^«
MG/L
?.000 S-^.r.QO 10.000 15.500
3.500 25.00'.
•4.100 la.^ni"> U.bOC
?'•}* o 0 0
50u53
C0'-
-------
APPENDIX E
PARAMETRIC RANKINGS OF LAKES
SAMPLED BY NES IN 1974
STATE OF OKLAHOMA
-------
L A <. E r: A T A TO i £ USED IN c A N < I N C- c.
L-"'' ^~ LI.
LA
,- . n 4 i
II ."20
0 . A ? !
'.) .Obi
0 . "• 3 *
0.070
0.027
0.142
fl.iB?
0.157
0.136
0.059
0.039
0.027
O.OHO
0.045
••'ED I AM
INO^G r.
0.0-30
0.070
0.07 0
0.405
0.110
0.135
0.090
1.780
0.740
0.250
0.690
0.5HO
0.550
0.150
0.230
0.160
soo-
"EAN SEC
»«!H.62S
443.600
4S9.400
482.513
4b4 .667
435.167
463.857
484.333
468.857
461 .000
4R4.303
483.000
435.500
46S.OOO
478.500
460.875
Mt AN
CHLO^A
1-.750
7.027
h . 4 ? 0
4.J83
14.96?
9.733
4.862
7.973
b.766
5.667
21.427
5.137
6.646
8.422
4.*12
12.325
15-
MIN 00
8.400
14.600
9.400
14.200
8.400
7.800
8.400
6.200
14.800
9.000
14.900
14.600
15.000
12.000
15.000
14.600
MtDIfi
OISS O^TH
u.010
O.UOM
0.00«
0.029
0.012
0.014
0.006
0.093
0.038
0.036
0.096
U.031
0.016
0.009
0.016
0.016
-------
r« ! T- .-!?^r_
4-3- C' L: LU- r
L --•'-• 'LI '-•' -T,
Li- u' HiFfii'L-
F-wT r. )H« ir'.^
-01 f
40U"
400-
40 lr>
KEYSTONf.
•. ^ r i i... vt -. 1 i'.
! >Ti.|_ -• I'.O-O- \
>- • : - > i :. r> t i - i
1 ( 1 3 ) ^ "I i 1 3 )
• • , u i - '• ( l'j >
1 i ( .1 ) 3 3 ( Si
' •> ! i I ) '3(1!)
3 •> ( S ) «i f ( 1 0 )
S, 1 ( 1 4 > 4 0 ( 1 ^ )
n ( u) 0(0)
i i i
7(1) 13 ( 2)
4f. < M .
^ *
27
^7
I)
*0
7
40
h7
13
ifO
100
S3
33
73
StC
( 7)
( !•*)
I 1?)
( 4)
( 13)
( 0)
( 9)
( 1)
( b)
( 10)
( ?)
( 3)
( 15)
( 8)
( S)
( 11)
•it'flN
CH|_0*4
1 1 ( ^1
-3 < i )
33 ( =>>
100 ( 1 "3 )
f ( 1 )
27 ( 4)
*7 ( 13)
47 ( 7)
60 ( 9)
73 ( 11)
0 ( 0)
60 ( 12)
67 ( 10)
40 ( 6)
93 ( 1»)
20 ( 3)
Ib-
MJN r
80 (
33 (
60 (
47 (
80 (
100 (
ao (
93 (
?0 (
67 (
13 !
33 (
3 (
S3 (
3 (
33 (
>0
11)
4)
9)
7)
11)
IS)
11 )
14)
3)
10)
?)
4)
0)
8)
0)
4)
".£!> I »'••'
oiss cm-o
7j ( 11)
93 ( 14)
ri7 ( ]-»)
33 ( ^1
67 ( 1 A )
MU ( U)
100 ( !<=.)
7 ( 1)
13 ( ?)
30 ( 3)
01 0)
27 ( 4)
UO ( 7)
fci 0 ( 1 ? )
401 6)
SO ( 7)
------- |