U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
WORKING PAPER SERIES
REPORT
ON
WISTER RESERVOIR
LEFLORE COUNIY
OKLAHOMA
EPA REGION VI
WORKING PAPER No, 595
CORVALLIS ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY - CORVALLIS, OREGON
and
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING & SUPPORT LABORATORY - LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
•&G.P.O. 699-440
-------
REPORT
ON
WISTER ESERVOIR
LEFLORE COUNIY
OKLAHOMA
EPA REGION VI
WORKING PAPER No, 595
WITH THE COOPERATION OF THE
OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF POLLUTION CONTROL
AND THE
OKLAHOMA NATIONAL GUARD
MARCH, 1977
-------
REPORT ON WISTER RESERVOIR
LEFLORE COUNTY, OKLAHOMA
EPA REGION VI
by
National Eutrophication Survey
Water and Land Monitoring Branch
Monitoring Applications Laboratory
Environmental Monitoring & Support Laboratory
Las Vegas, Nevada
and
Eutrophication Survey Branch
Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory
Corvallis, Oregon
Working Paper No. 595
OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
March 1977
-------
CONTENTS
Page
Foreword i i
List of Oklahoma Study Lakes iv
Lake and Drainage Area Map v
Sections
I. Conclusions 1
II. Lake and Drainage Basin Characteristics 4
III. Lake Water Quality Summary 6
IV. Nutrient Loadings 13
V. Literature Reviewed 19
VI. Appendices 20
-------
n
FOREWORD
The National Eutrophication Survey was Initiated in 1972 in
response to an Administration commitment to investigate the nation-
wide threat of accelerated eutrophicatlon to freshwater lakes and
reservoirs.
OBJECTIVES
The Survey was designed to develop, in conjunction with state
environmental agencies, information on nutrient sources, concen-
trations, and impact on selected freshwater lakes as a basis for
formulating comprehensive and coordinated national, regional, and
state management practices relating to point source discharge
reduction and nonpoint source pollution abatement in lake water-
sheds.
ANALYTIC APPROACH
The mathematical and statistical procedures selected for the
Survey's eutrophication analysis are based on related concepts
that:
a. A generalized representation or model relating
sources, concentrations, and impacts can be
constructed.
b. By applying measurements of relevant parameters
associated with lake degradation, the generalized
model can be transformed into an operational
representation of a lake, its drainage basin, and
related nutrients.
c. With such a transformation, an assessment of the
potential for eutrophication control can be made.
LAKE ANALYSIS
In this report, the first stage of evaluation of lake and
watershed data collected from the study lake and its drainage
basin is documented. The report is formatted to provide state
environmental agencies with specific information for basin
planning [§303(e)], water quality criteria/standards review
[§303(c)], clean lakes [§314(a,b)], and water quality monitoring
[§106 and §305(b)] activities mandated by the Federal Water
Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972.
-------
Ill
Beyond the single lake analysis, broader based correlations
between nutrient concentrations (and loading) and trophic condition
are being made to advance the rationale and data base for refine-
ment of nutrient water quality criteria for the Nation's freshwater
lakes. Likewise, multivariate evaluations for the relationships
between land use, nutrient export, and trophic condition, by lake
class or use, are being developed to assist in the formulation of
planning guidelines and policies by the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency and to augment plans implementation by the states.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The staff of the National Eutrophication Survey (Office of
Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency)
expresses sincere appreciation to the Oklahoma Department of
Pollution Control for professional involvement, to the Oklahoma
National Guard for conducting the tributary sampling phase of the
Survey, and to those Oklahoma wastewater treatment plant operators
who provided effluent samples and flow data.
Dr. Denver Talley, Director, Oklahoma Department of Pollution
Control; the staff of the Oklahoma Water Resources Board; and the
staff of the Oklahoma State Department of Health reviewed the pre-
liminary reports and provided critiques most useful in the prepara-
tion of this Working Paper Series.
Major General John Coffey, Jr., the Adjutant General of
Oklahoma, and Project Officers Colonel Curtis V!. Milligan and
Major James 0. Haney, Jr., who directed the volunteer efforts of
the Oklahoma National Guardsmen, are also gratefully acknowledged
for their assistance to the Survey.
-------
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
STUDY LAKES
STATE OF OKLAHOMA
LAKE NAME
Altus Reservoir
Arbuckle Lake
Lake Elsworth
Lake Eufaula
Fort Cobb Reservoir
Fort Supply Reservoir
Foss Dam Reservoir
Lake Frances
Grand Lake 0' The Cherokees
Lake Hefner
Keystone Reservoir
Oologah Lake
Tenkiller Ferry Reservoir
Lake Thunderbird
Wister Reservoir
COUNTY
Greer, Kiowa
Murray
Caddo, Comanche
Haskell, Mclntosh,
Okmulgee, Pittsburg
Caddo
Woodward
Custer
Adair
Mayes, Delaware, Craig,
Ottowa
Oklahoma
Tulsa, Creek, Osage, Pawnee
Nowata, Rogers
Cherokee, Sequoyah
Cleveland
LeFlore
-------
r I
Sewage 7-eat-ent ?5ci".ity
Trioutary Sanc'ii.no Site
x Lake Sampling Site
j^f Drainage Area Boundary
Map Location
9500
9400'
-------
REPORT ON WISTER RESERVOIR, OKLAHOMA
STORE! NO. 4015
I. CONCLUSIONS
A. Trophic Condition:*
Survey data indicate that Wister Reservoir is eutrophic,
i.e., nutrient rich and productive. Whether such nutrient
enrichment is to be considered beneficial or deleterious is
determined by its actual or potential impact upon designated
beneficial water uses of each lake.
Nutrient levels in Wister Reservoir were quite high:
of the 16 Oklahoma lakes (including Lake Texoma) sampled in
1974, only 4 had higher median total phosphorus levels, 7 had
higher median inorganic nitrogen values, and 6 had higher median
orthophosphorus levels than this reservoir. Potential for
primary productivity, as measured by algal assay control yield,
was high in spring and moderate during fall sampling. Chloro-
phyll a^ values ranged from 2.7 ng/1 to 8.4 yg/1, with a mean
of 4.8 ug/1.
Survey limnologists did not observe macrophytes or surface
algal concentrations during their sampling visits. However, it
was noted that the lake at times was very turbid, and the low
Secchi disc transparencies (range of 0.3 to 0.9 meters) suggest
*See Appendix E.
-------
that primary productivity in Wister Reservoir may have been
light-limited, even though no clear-cut direct relationship was
noted between light penetration and chlorophyll a^ levels.
B. Rate-Limiting Nutrient:
The algal assay results indicate that the primary limiting
nutrient in Wister Reservoir was phosphorus at the times of
sampling. The lake data indicate phosphorus limitation in June
and October, respectively, and primary limitation by nitrogen in
March and August.
C. Nutrient Controllability:
1. Point sources -
During the 1974 sampling year, point sources were esti-
mated to have contributed 6.1% of the total phosphorus load
to Wister Reservoir. The town of Heavener contributed 4.9%
and Red Oak contributed 1.2%.
Loading calculations based upon available nutrient con-
centrations yield a net export of both phosphorus and nitro-
gen from the reservoir, indicating that sampling was not
adequate to depict actual loading and/or export rates from
Wister Reservoir. This export might be attributable to an
underestimation of nutrient loading from the known point
sources and septic tanks, or to sampling error. It is known
that a waterfowl refuge exists on Wister Reservoir; additional
study to determine the nutrient impact of this refuge on the
reservoir is needed.
-------
The total annual phosphorus loading to Wister
2
Reservoir is 2.89 g P/m /yr, twice that proposed by Vollen-
weider (1975) as "eutrophic" for a lake with such volume and
hydraulic retention time. However, Vollenweider's model may
not be applicable to lakes with short retention times (16 days
for Wister Reservoir) or in which epilimnetic light penetra-
tion is severely reduced by the presence of suspended sediments
in the surface waters. In any case, it does not appear likely
that point source phosphorus control would result in any appre-
ciable improvement in the trophic condition of the lake.
2. Nonpoint sources -
Nonpoint sources, including precipitation, were calcu-
lated to have contributed 93.9% of the total phosphorus load
to Wister Reservoir. The Poteau River contributed 45.2%,
Fourche Maline Creek contributed 40.6%, and ungaged tribu-
taries were estimated to contribute 5.0%.
-------
II,. LAKE AND DRAINAGE BASIN CHARACTERISTICS
Lake and drainage basin characteristics are itemized below.
Lake surface area and mean depth were provided by the Oklahoma
Department of Pollution Control; maximum depth was provided by
the Oklahoma Water Resources Board. Tributary flow data were pro-
vided by the Oklahoma District Office of the U.S. Geological Sur-
vey (USGS). Outlet drainage area includes the lake surface area.
Mean hydraulic retention time was obtained by dividing the lake
volume by mean flow of the outlet. Precipitation values are
estimated by means as outlined in National Eutrophication Survey
(NES) Working Paper No. 175. A table of metric/English conver-
sions is included as Appendix A.
A. Lake Morphometry:
1. Surface area: 16.19 km2.
2. Mean depth: 2.3 meters.
3. Maximum depth: 13.4 meters.
4. Volume: 37.237 x 106 m3.
5. Mean hydraulic retention time: 16 days.
-------
Tributary and Outlet;
(§ee Appendix B for flow data)
1. Tributaries -
Drainage Mean flow
Name area(km2) (m3/sec)
A-2 Poteau River 1,320.9 14.91
B-l Oil Branch 4.5 0.04
C-l Holston Creek 149.7 1.52
D-l Fourche Maline Creek 686.3 7.36
Minor tributaries and
immediate drainage - 393.0 4.35
Totals 2,554.4 28.13
2. Outlet - A-l Poteau River 2,570.7 27.35
Precipitation:
1. Year of sampling: 122.4 cm.
2. Mean annual: 115.4 cm.
-------
Ill, LAKE WATER QUALITY SUMMARY
Wister Reservoir was sampled four times during the open-
water season of 1974 by means of a pontoon-equipped Huey heli-
copter. Each time, samples for physical and chemical parameters
were collected from two stations on the lake and from a number
of depths at each station (see map, page v). During each visit,
depth-integrated samples were collected from each station for
chlorophyll a_ analysis and phytoplankton identification and enu-
meration. During the first and last visits, 18.9-liter depth-
integrated samples were composited for algal assays. Maximum
depths sampled were 12.2 meters at Station 01 and 10.7 meters at
Station 02. For a more detailed explanation of NES methods, see
NES Working Paper No. 175.
The results obtained are presented in full in Appendix C and
are summarized in III-A for waters at the surface and at the maxi-
mum depth for each site. Results of the phytoplankton counts and
chlorophyll ^determinations are included in III-B. Results of
the limiting nutrient study are presented in III-C.
-------
•»IST!IH RESErtVOIR
STORE.T CODE 4015
PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS
TE^J-EPATUPt (DEG CtNT)
O.-l.S M DEPTH 4
MAX OEPTHoo ?.
( 3/28/74 ]
$««« = 2
RANGE MEDIAN
13.7- 14.5 14.1
9.6- 11.1 in. 3
i
MAX
DEPTH
(METERS)
0.0- 1.5
8.5- 9.1
N«
4
( 6/ 7/74
RANGE MEDIAN
22.8- 24.2 23.7
21.3- 23.6 22.4
MAX
DEPTH
KANGE
(METEKS)
0.0- 1.5
10.7- 12.2
2
( 8/26/74
S««« = 2
RANGE MEDIAN
27.2- 28.2 27.5
22.9- 23.2 23.0
MAX
RANGE
(METERS)
0.0- 1.5
8.2- 9.1
DISSOLVED OXY(-tN
0.-1.5 M DEPTH
MAX OEPTH*0
CONDUCTIVITY (UMHOSI
0.-1.5 M DEPTH
MAX OEPTH«-»
Ph (STANDARD UNITS)
0.-l.ri M DEPTH
MAX DEPTH00
TOTAL ALKALINITY (MG,
0.-1.5 M DEPTH
MAX DEPTH*-"
TOTAL P (MG/L)
0.-1.5 M DEPTH
MAX OEPln0"
2
2
4
2
4
2
/L)
4
2
4
2
9.2-
8.0-
41.-
39.-
7.8-
7.4-
10.-
10.-
0.059-0
0.066-0
9.4
d.2
46.
43.
8.1
7.9
10.
10.
.067
.070
9.3
•3.1
44.
41.
7.8
7.6
10.
10.
0.063
0.068
1.5-
8.5-
0.0-
8.5-
0.0-
8.5-
0.0-
8.5-
0.0-
8.5-
1.5
9.1
1.5
9.1
l.b
9.1
1.5
9.1
1.5
9.1
2
2
4
2
4
1
4
2
4
2
5.8-
5.6-
53.-
43.-
5.8-
6.7-
17.-
11.-
0.075-0
0.107-0
b.U
6.2
63.
62.
6.8
6.7
20.
21.
.099
.214
6.3
5.9
59.
53.
6.7
6.7
19.
16.
0.088
O.loO
1.5-
10.7-
0.0-
10.7-
0.0-
12.2-
0.0-
10.7-
0.0-
10.7-
1.5
12.2
1.5
12.2
1.5
12.2
1.5
12.2
1.5
12.2
4
2
4
2
4
2
4
2
4
*
2.8-
0.0-
69.-
136.-
6.3-
6.5-
2H.-
38.-
0.116-0
0.179-0
5.2
0.2
75.
138.
6.5
6.5
32.
47.
.127
.183
4.7
0.1
71.
137.
6.4
6.5
31.
43.
0.119
0.181
0.0-
8.2-
0.0-
8.2-
0.0-
8.2-
0.0-
8.2-
0.0-
8.2-
1.5
9.1
1.5
9.1
1.5
9.1
l.b
9.1
1.5
4.1
DISSOLVED OKTHO P (MG/L)
O.-l.S M DEPTH
MAX 3EPTH»°
0.-1.5 M DEKTri
MAX. OEPTH«»
AMMONIA (MG/L)
0.-1.5 M DEPTH
"AX DEPTH**
KJELDAHL N (Mfa/L)
O.-l.S * Ut>TH
MAX DEPTH*0
4
2
4
2
4
2
4
2
0.016-0
0.018-0
0.070-0
0.120-0
0.060-0
0. 100-0
0.400-0
0.400-0
.026
.021
.120
.140
.070
.120
.600
.400
0.022
0.019
0.095
0.130
0.060
0.110
0.500
0.400
0.0-
8.b-
0.0-
«.S-
0.0-
8.5-
0.0-
8.5-
1.5
9.1
1.5
9.1
1.5
9.1
l.b
9.1
4
2
4
2
4
2
4
2
0.010-0
0.011-0
0.130-0
0.150-0
0.130-0
0.170-U
0.5UO-0
0.600-0
.01?
.013
.160
.190
.170
.180
.700
.800
0.012
0.012
0.145
0.170
0.150
0.175
0.650
0.700
0.0-
10.7-
0.0-
10.7-
0.0-
10.7-
0.0-
10.7-
1.5
12.2
1.5
12.2
1.5
12.2
l.b
12.2
4
2
4
2
4
2
4
2
0.072-0
0.021-0
0.020-0
0.0.10-0
0.060-0
1.000-1
0.400-0
1.300-1
.099
.047
.020
.030
.110
.290
.600
.700
0.077
0.034
0.020
0.030
0.090
1.145
0.500
1.600
0.0-
8.2-
0.0-
6.2-
0.0-
8.2-
0.0-
8.2-
1.5
V.I
1.5
9.1
i.5
9.1
i .5
V.I
StCCHI DISC
0.4- 0.5
0.4
0.5- O.b
0.5
0.9- 0.9
0.9
« N = NO. OF SAMPLES
»» MAXIMUM DEPTH SAMPLED Af EACH SITE
»«« S = NO. OF SITE* SAMPLED ON THIS DATE
-------
W IS T t: D Pc.sE»tvni>j
cone 40is
f-ARAMf TEP
( 10/21/74 )
*AX
So »o = ? DEPTH
HANGE MEDIAN
ANU CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS
ftvt (DEO
O.-l.b M OtPTH
MAX
17.7- 17.9
17.b- 17.7
DISSOLVED
O.-l.b M 1'E.PTi
("G/L >
2
CONDUCTIVITY njfHOS)
0.-1.5 M f.'EPTH 4
MAX DEPTH** 2
Pt- (STANDARD UMITb)
O.-l.b •* DEPTH t
MAX DEPTri** 2
TOTAL ALKALINITY
O.-l.b v I'EPTH 4
MAX L>EPTh»» 'd
TOTAL P (MG/L)
0.-1.5 M DEVTri
MA>
6.0-
6.4-
41.-
41.-
6.2-
6.1-
in.-
13.-
8.0
6.4
43.
45.
6.2
6.2
18.
16.
DISSOLVED OKTHO P (MG/L)
O.-l.S M l/EPTH 4
MAX UEPTH«* 2
0.063
0.079
0.007
0.007
•0.077
•0.10*
•0.015
•O.Olb
17.b
17.6
6.6
6.4
42.
43.
6.2
6.1
14.
15.
0.069
0.091
0.006
0.011
0.0- l.b
7.9- 10.1
0.0- l.b
7.9- 10.1
0.0- 1.5
7.9- 10.1
0.0- l.b
7.9- 10.1
0.0- 1.5
7.9- 10.1
0.0- l.b
7.9- 10.1
0.0- l.b
7.9- 10.1
O.-l.b M UEPTn
MAX.
AMMOMIA
O.-l.b M DEPTH
MAX OtPTH*<»
KJELDAHI. N (M(,/L)
O.-l.? M DEPTH
MAX DEP
SECCHI DISC
4 0.070-0.130 0.120 0.0- l.b
2 O.ObO-0.130 O.r>9b 7.9- 10.1
4 0.060-0.140 0.085 0.0- l.b
2 O.OHO-O.llO 0.093 7.9- 10.1
4 0.400-0.700 O.S50 0.0- l.b
2 0.500-0.600 O.bSO f.9- 10.1
0.3- 0.5
0.4
«• N = NO. OH SAMPLES
*« MAXIMUM DEPTH SAMPLED AT EACH MTE
= NQ. OF SUES SAMPLED ON THIS DATE
-------
B. Biological Characteristics:
1. Phytoplankton -
Sampling
Date
03/28/74
06/07/74
08/26/74
10/21/74
Dominant
Genera
1. Melosira
2. Ankistrodesmus
3. Chroomonas
4. Cryptomonas
5. Flagellates
Other genera
Total
1. Melosira
2. Flagellates
3. Nitzschia
4. Coelastrum
Other genera
Total
1. Melosira
2. Anabaena
3. Ankistrodesmus
4. Closterium
5. Cryptomonas
Other genera
Total
1. Melosira
2. Dactylococcopsis
3. Nitzschia
4. Kirchneriella
5. Cryptomonas
Other genera
Total
Algal
Units
per ml
'488
325
293
163
65
358
1,692
3,422
254
95
32
3,803
344
31
31
31
31
187
655
2,479
. 303
220
138
83
494
3,717
-------
10
2. Chlorophyll a -
Sampling Station Chlorophyll
Date Number (yg/1)
03/28/74 01 5.3
02 2.6
06/07/74 01 6.5
02 2.7
08/26/74 01 4.3
02 3.9
10/21/74 01 4.8
02 3.4
-------
11
C. Limiting Nutrient Study -
1. Autoclaved, filtered, and nutrient spiked -
Ortho P Inorganic N Maximum Yield
Spjke(mg/1) Conc.(mg/l) ConcTdng/l) (mg/1-dry wt.)
a. 03/28/74
Control 0,020 0.119 2.5
0.05 P 0.070 0.119 4.6
0.05 P + 1.0 N 0.070 1.119 23.0
1.00 N 0.020 1.119 2.3
b. 10/21/74
Control 0.010 0.158 0.9
0.05 P 0.060 0.158 5.6
0.05 P + 1.0 N 0.060 1.158 17.3
1.00 N 0.010 1.158 0.6
2. Discussion -
The control yield of the assay alga, Selenastrum capri-
cornutum, indicates that the potential primary productivity
in Wister Reservoir was high at the time of spring sampling
(03/28/74) and moderate during fall (10/21/74). The control
yields would likely have been higher still had there been no
substantial nutrient loss between sampling and assay. In both
assays, there was a significant increase in yield over that
of the control when orthophosphorus was added, indicating
phosphorus limitaton. The addition of nitrogen alone did not
result in an increase in yield over that of the control.
Mean inorganic nitrogen to orthophosphorus (N/P) ratios
in the lake data were 24/1 and 20/1 in June and October,
respectively, supporting primary limitation by phosphorus in
-------
12
Wister Reservoir. Mean N/P ratios were 8/1 and 7/1, respec-
tfvely, in March and August, however, suggesting nitrogen
was the primary limiting nutrient upon those sampling occa-
sions.
-------
13
IV. NUTRIENT LOADINGS
(See Appendix D for data)
For the determination of nutrient loadings, the Oklahoma
National Guard collected monthly near-surface grab samples from
each of the tributary sites indicated on the map (page v), ex-
cept for the high runoff month of May when two samples were col-
lected. Sampling was begun in November 1974, and was completed
October 1975.
Through an interagency agreement, stream flow estimates for
the year of sampling and a "normalized" or average year were pro-
vided by the Oklahoma District Office of the USGS for the tribu-
tary sites nearest the lake.
In this report, nutrient loads for sampled tributaries were
determined by using a modification of a USGS computer program for
calculating stream loadings. Nutrient loads indicated for tribu-
taries are those measured minus known point source loads, if any.
Nutrient loadings for unsampled "minor tributaries and imme-
diate drainage" ("ZZ" of USGS) were estimated by using the mean
annual nutrient loads, in kg/km2/yr, in Oil Branch and Holston
Creek at Stations B-l and C-l, and multiplying the means by the
ZZ area in km2.
Nutrient loads for the Heavener and Red Oak wastewater treat-
ment plants were estimated at 1.134 kg P and 3.401 kg N/capita/yr.
-------
14
A. Waste Sources:
1. Known municipal -
Name*
Heavener
Red Oak
Pop,*
Served
2,000
500
Treatment*
Trickling
filter
Stabilization
pond
Mean Flow
(m3/d x 103)
0.757**
0.189**
Receiving
Water
Oil Branch/
Poteau River
Red Oak Creek/
Fourche Maline
Creek
2. Known industrial - None
*U.S.EPA, 1971.
**Estimated at 0.3785 m3/capita/day.
-------
15
B. Annual Total Phosphorus Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
% of
Source kg P/yr total
a. Tributaries (nonpoint load) -
A-2 Poteau River 21,140 45.2
B-l Oil Branch 25 0.1
C-l Holston Creek 1,110 2.4
D-l Fourche Maline Creek 18,965 40.6
b. Minor tributaries and immediate
drainage (nonpoint load) - 2,360 5.0
c. Known municipal STP's -
Heavener 2,270 4.9
Red Oak 565 1.2
d. Septic tanks* - 5 <0.1
e. Known industrial - None
f. Direct precipitation** - 285 0.6
Totals 46,725 100.0
2. Output - A-l Poteau River 58,145
3. Net annual P export*** - 11,420
*Estimate based on 10 lakeshore residences and 1 park.
**Estimated (see NES Working Paper No. 175).
***Export probably due to unknown sources and/or sampling error.
-------
16
C. Annual Total Nitrogen Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
% of
Source kg N/yr total
a. Tributaries (nonpoint load) -
A-2 Poteau River 360,475 54.3
B-l Oil Branch 815 0.1
C-l Holston Creek 21,695 3.3
D-l Fourche Maline Creek 191,125 28.8
b. Minor tributaries and immediate
drainage (nonpoint load) - 64,060 9.6
c. Known municipal STP's -
Heavener 6,800 1.0
Red Oak 1,700 0.3
d. Septic tanks* - 140 <0.1
e. Known industrial - None
f. Direct precipitation** - 17,480 2.6
Totals 664,290 100.0
2. Output - A-l Poteau River 791,155
3. Net annual N export*** - 126,865
*Estimate based on 10 lakeshore residences and 1 park.
**Estimated (see NES Working Paper No. 175).
***Export probably due to unknown sources and/or sampling error.
-------
17
D. Mean Annual Nonpoint Nutrient Export by Subdrainage Area:
Tributary kg P/km2/yr kg N/km2/yr
Poteau River 16 273
Oil Branch 5 181
Holston Creek 7 145
Fourche Maline Creek 28 278
-------
E. Yearly Loadings:
In the following table, the existing phosphorus annual loading
is compared to the relationship proposed by Vollenweider (1975).
Essentially, his "eutrophic" loading is that at which the receiving
waters would become eutrophic or remain eutrophic; his "oligotrophic"
loading is that which would result in the receiving water remaining
oligotrophic or becoming oligotrophic if morphometry permitted. A
"mesotrophic" loading would be considered one between "eutrophic" and
"oligotrophic".
Note that Vollenweider's model may not be applicable to water
bodies with very short retention times or in which light penetration
is severely restricted from high concentrations of suspended solids
in the surface waters.
Total Yearly
Phosphorus Loading
(g/m2/yr)
Estimated loading for Wister Reservoir 2.89
Vollenweider's "eutrophic" loading 1.46
Vollenweider's "oligotrophic" loading 0.73
-------
19
IV- LITERATURE REVIEWED
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1971. ''Inventory of Waste-
water Treatment Facilities". EPA Publication No, OWP-1, Vol. 6.
Office of Media Programs, Office of Water Programs, Washington,
D,C.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1975. National Eutrophica-
tion Survey Methods 1973-1976. Working Paper No. 175. National
Environmental Research Center, Las Vegas, Nevada, and Pacific
Northwest Environmental Research Laboratory, Con/all is, Oregon.
Vollenweider, R. A. 1975. Input-Output Models With Special
Reference to the Phosphorus Loading Concept in Limnology.
Schweiz. Z. Hydrol. 37:53-84.
-------
20
VI. APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
CONVERSION FACTORS
-------
CONVERSION FACTORS
Hectares x 2.471 = acres
Kilometers x 0.6214 = miles
Meters x 3.281 = feet
Cubic meters x 8.107 x 10"4 = acre/feet
Square kilometers x 0.3861 -- square miles
Cubic meters/sec x 35.315 = cubic feot/sec
Centimeters x 0.3937 - inches
Kilograms x 2.205 - pounds
Kilograms/square kilometer x 5.711 - Ibs/square mile
-------
APPENDIX B
TRIBUTARY FLOW DATA
-------
TRIBUTARY i-LO* INFORMATION FOR OKLAHOMA
03/25/77
LAKE CODE 4015
1.,-dSTER SES.
TOTAL DRAINAGE AKEA Of' LAKUSO KM) 2570.7
JAN
A^EA'SO KM)
APR
MAr
NORMALIZED FLOWS(CMS)
JUN JUL AUG
SEP
OCT
MOV
DEC
4015A1
4015A2
4ul5rfl
4015C1
4015D1
4015ZZ
257C.7
1320.9
4.5
149.7
fS8ft.3
409.2
•35.40
20.39
0.023
1.13
5.10
3.11
37.94
26.19
0,031
1.70
11.61
6.51
51.54
27.18
0 .0^5
2.46
12.18
7.T8
52. b7
26.53
0.04?
2.41
17.27
9.b3
62.86
30.87
0.12S
3.b5
16.99
10.19
19.26
7.90
0.031
1.22
5.36
3.11
9.06
4.53
0.028
1.13
5.10
3.11
8.21
2.27
O.Oli
0.40
1.39
0.85
5.66
3.06
0.034
1.02
2.27
1.70
7.36
4.11
0.028
1.08
2.41
1.70
16.42
8.98
0.020
0.65
3.6a
2.27
22.37
17.56
0.020
0.99
5,38
3.11
27.35
14.91
0.037
1.52
7.36
4.35
MEAN MONTHLY FLOwS AND DAILY FLOwS(CMS)
TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAR
4015A1
MEAN FLOW DAY
4015A2
11
1?
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1C
11
12
I
2
3
4
5
h
1
8
9
10
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
91.180
92.313
22.653
84.384
82.402
73.624
61.164
63.996
31.998
0.566
0.453
0.368
60.315
15.291
15.999
45.873
60.315
42.475
33.131
34.547
1.557
0.368
0.510
0.368
2
17
15
13
28
22
12
12
8
15
7
2
17
15
13
28
2?
12
12
e
15
7
1.699
83.915
34.263
109.586
0.435
3.058
112.984
88.349
30.016
0.566
0,396
22.625
11.298
11.298
13.592
484.218
0.0
17.698
2l.6')l
U926
0,113
0.122
SUMMARY
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA OF LAKE = 2570.7
SUM OF SUB-DMAIMAGE AREAS = 2570.7
TOTAL FLOW IN
TOTAL FLOw OUT
339.37
328.7fc
FLO* DAY
FLOW DAY
FLOW
22
30.299
22
8.382
-------
FXOw INFORMATION Fun OKLAHOMA
OJ/25/77
CODE 4015
j.iISTER «ES.
MEAM MONTHLf FLO«S AND DAIL* FLOWS(CMSI
TRIBUTARY MONTH YEA* MEAN FLOW DAY
4U15C1
4015D1
401522
11
1?
1
?
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
b
7
e
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
c:
6
7
8
0
10
11
}?.
1
2
U
5
6
7
a
9
10
7<»
7*
75
7S
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
7^
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
7b
75
(•"LOW DAY
FLOW
FLOW
u.23rt
'J.062
0.068
0.212
C.147
0. 105
0.105
0.139
o.ooa
0.00?
0.006
0.001
7.^00
2.095
2.265
7.079
4.814
3.39R
3.398
4.531
0.283
0.057
0.19T
0.025
36.246
9.628
10.477
32.281
22.370
15.8??
16. 141
20.954
1.359
0.258
0.878
0.122
21.521
5.663
6.230
19.255
9.345
9.6?8
12.459
0.850
O.IS3
0.566
0.074
2
17
15
13
28
22
12
12
a
lb
7
2
17
15
13
2tt
22
12
12
8
15
7
2
17
15
13
28
22
12
12
8
15
7
O.K2
0.051
0.028
0.062
1.149
0.02U
0.040
0.031
O.OOtt
0.0
0.0
15.008
1.274
1.133
1.699
15.0f>b
0.736
1.699
1.416
0.36H
0.252
0.028
68.?44
5.947
7.362
7.646
66.261
2.039
8.212
6.796
1.671
1.161
0.136
22
0.017
22
0.538
22
1.727
-------
APPENDIX C
PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL DATA
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 77/03/38
/TYPA/AMtJNT/LAKE
DATE
FROM
TO
74/03/28
74/06/07
74/08/26
74/10/21
00010
TIME DEPTH WATER
OF TEMP
DAY FEET
16
16
16
16
14
14
14
14
13
13
13
13
14
14
14
14
15
15
IS
15
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
25
25
25
25
COOO
0005
C015
0030
0000
0005
0025
0040
0000
0005
0015
0030
0000
0005
0020
0033
CENT
14
14
12
11
24
24
23
23
27
27
25
22
17
17
17
17
.5
.5
. 0
.1
.2
.1
.7
.6
.2
.2
.0
.9
.7
.7
.6
.5
00300
00
MG/L
9.
8.
8.
6.
6.
6.
4.
5.
0.
0.
6.
6.
6.
6.
4
4
2
8
6
2
4
0
2
2
0
8
0
4
401501
34 Sb 15.0 094 43 10.0 3
WISTER RESERVOIR
40079 OKLAHOMA
100991
11EPALES
04001002
0035 FEET DEPTH CLASS
00300
00
MG/L
9.4
8.4
8.2
6.8
6.6
6.2
4.4
5.0
0.2
0.2
6.0
6.8
6.0
6.4
00077
TR4NSP
SECCHI
INCHES
15
18
36
12
00094
CNOUCTVY
FIELD
M1CHOMHO
41
42
40
39
62
63
62
62
69
69
98
136
41
41
43
41
00400
PH
SU
7.80
8.10
8.10
7.90
6.80
6.70
6.90
6.70
6.44
6.50
6.47
6.53
6.18
6.17
6.15
6.17
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
10K
10K
10K
10K
20
20
19
21
30
31
41
47
18
14
13
13
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.060
0.060
0.100
0.120
0.170
0.160
0.160
0.180
0.090
0.090
0.520
1.000
0.140
0.090
0.100
0.110
00
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.500
0.500
0.400
0.400
0.700
0.500
0.500
0.600
0.600
0.400
0.900
1.500
0.700
0.400
0.400
0.500
00630
N02&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.120
0.120
0.130
0.140
0.150
0.160
0.160
0.150
0.020
0.020
0.030
0.030
0.150
0.140
0.130
0.130
00671
PHOS-OIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.026
0.025
0.030
0.021
0.012
0.012
0.010
0.011
0.078
0.077
0.070
0.021
0.010
0.007
0.007
0.015
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 77/03/28
/TYPA/AMBNT/LAKE
DATE
FROM
TO
74/03/28
74/06/07
74/08/36
74/10/21
00665 32217 00031
TIME DEPTH PHOS-TOT CHLRPHYL INCUT LT
OF A HEMMNG
OAY FEET
16
16
16
16
14
14
14
14
13
13
13
13
14
14
14
14
14
15
15
15
15
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
?5
25
?5
25
25
0000
0005
0015
0030
0000
0005
0025
0040
0000
0005
0015
0030
0000
0002
0005
0020
0033
MG/L P UG/L PERCENT
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
0
.061 5.3
.059
.064
.066
.087 6.5
.075
.082
.107
.118 4.3
.116
.136
.183
.075 4.8
1.0
.063
.078
.079
401501
34 56 15.0 094 43
WISTES RESERVOIR
i.0079 OKLAHOMA
10.0 3
100991
11EPALES
0035 FEET
0*001002
DEPTH CLASS 00
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 77/03/28
/TYPA/AM8NT/LAKE
DATE
FROM
TO
74/03/28
74/06/07
74/08/26
74/10/21
TIME
OF
DAY
16 35
16 35
16 35
16 35
15 00
15 00
15 00
15 00
13 00
13 00
13 00
13 00
14 50
14 50
14 50
14 50
DEPTH
FEET
0000
0005
0015
0028
0000
0005
0015
0035
0000
0005
0015
0027
0000
0005
0015
0026
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
13.8
13.7
10.9
9.6
23.3
22. a
21.9
21.3
28.2
27.8
25.9
23.2
17.9
17.8
17.8
17.7
401502
34 55 52.0 094 46 32.0 3
WISTER RESERVOIR
i»0079 OKLAHOMA
100991
11EPALES
04001002
0033 FEET DEPTH CLASS
00300
DO
MG/L
9.2
8.2
8.0
5.8
5.8
5.6
5.2
2.8
0.0
0.0
8.0
6.8
6.2
6.4
00077
TRANSP
SECCHI
INCHES
19
18
36
18
00094
CNDUCTVY
FIELD
MICROMHO
46
46
47
43
56
53
48
43
73
75
95
138
43
43
43
45
00400
PH
SU
7.80
7.80
7.60
7.40
6.80
5.80
6.44
6.28
6.33
6.53
6.17
6.17
6.15
6.11
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
10K
10K
10K
10K
17
17
13
11
28
32
38
38
10
13
15
16
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.060
0.070
0.090
0.100
0.140
0.130
0.110
0.170
0.060
0.110
0.400
1.290
0.060
0.080
0.080
0.080
00
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.400
0.600
0.400
0.400
0.700
0.600
0.600
0.800
0.600
0.400
0.900
1.700
0.700
0.400
0.400
0.600
00630
N02MM03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.070
0.070
0.110
0.120
0.130
0.140
0.160
0.190
0.020K
0.020K
0.030
0.030
0.100
0.070
0.060
0.060
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.019
0.016
0.024
0.018
0.010
0.017
0.015
0.013
0.099
0.072
0.039
0.047
0.015
0.007
0.008
0.007
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 77/03/28
401502
34 55 52.0 094 46 32.0 3
WJSTER RESERVOIH
40079 OKLAHOMA
100991
/TYPA/AM8NT/LAKE
11EPALES 04001002
0033 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
DATE
FROM
TO
74/03/28
74/06/07
74/08/26
74/10/21
00665 32217 00031
TIME DEPTH PHOS-TOT CHLRPHYL INCDT LT
OF A REMMNG
DAY FEET
16
16
16
16
15
15
15
15
13
13
13
13
14
14
14
14
14
35
35
35
35
00
CO
00
00
00
00
00
00
50
50
50
50
50
0000
0005
0015
0028
0000
0005
OOlb
0035
0000
0005
0015
0027
0000
0003
0005
0015
0026
MG/L P UG/L PERCENT
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
.066 2.6
.067
.067
.070
.090 2.7
.099
.119
.214
.121 3.9
.127
.156
.179
.077 8.4
1.0
.063
.073
.104
-------
APPENDIX D
TRIBUTARY AND WASTEWATER
TREATMENT PLANT DATA
-------
bT'JRET RETRIEVAL 'JATE 77/G3/24
/ T YP A/A'^riNT/STREAM
4,U5Al
34 56 05.0 094 37 tO.O <
P01EAU RIVER
40 15 riEAVENtK
0/LAKE LISTER RESERVOIR
100991
OUTLET OF WlSTER DAM 2.5 MI SE OF WlSTER
11EPALES 0400100*
0000 FEET DEPTn CLA5S 00
DATE
FROM
TO
74/1 1/02
74/12/17
75/01/15
75/02/13
75/03/28
75/04/22
75/05/12
75/35/22
75/06/12
75/07/08
75/08/15
75/10/07
00630 C0625
TIME DEPTH N02i*N03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TOTAL N
UA:
11
14
11
10
10
10
11
13
12
13
10
13
1 FEET
20
0*
10
45
?5
28
01
19
53
02
45
40
MG/L
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
U
0
0
.116
. 104
.080
.080
.060
.015
.040
.020
.010
.015
.025
.290
MG/L
0.
V).
2.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
1.
0.
500
600
500.
600
650
950
900
650
650
200
200
700
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N Pi-tOS-DIS HhOS-TOT
TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
c .
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
072
270
064
064
060
025
080
085
050
230
540
035
MG/L P
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.012
.060
.015
.016
.010
.010
.010
.010
.010
.100
.055
.005
MG/L P
0.050
0.070
0.080
0.06C
0.090
U. 100
0.060
0.05C
0.060
0.200
0.110
C.080
-------
RETrflEu'AL iJATE 77/03/24
/Tr^n/AM8NT/S1 -(f A'-'
04TE
TO
74/11/02
74/12/17
75/01/15
75/02/13
75/03/28
75/04/22
75/05/12
75/05/22
75/06/12
75/07/08
75/08/15
75/10/07
TIME DE^T-
OK
DAY FEET
12 0.1
14 3S
13 36
13 15
12 15
12 IS
11 45
14 05
13 35
13 40
12 00
14 45
00630
NO?e.N03
rJ-TOTAL
MG/L
0.080
0.072
0*068
0.100
0.005
L',050
U.005
u.065
0.005
1.015
0.005
00625
TCT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.600
0.500
0.60C
0.500
1.150
0.500
0.400
0.300
2.200
0.450
0.700
0.300
0-/610
TOTAL
Mo/L
.1.055
0.030
0.032
0.056
0.3MC
0.01C
0.022
0.020
0.130
0.025
0.025
0.020
4015A2
34 51 30.0 034 47 00,0 4
00671
'rlOS-iJlS
0« TrlO
MG/L P
0.020
0.010
0.010
0.016
C.025
0.005
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.005
0.005
0.005K
4C Ib
T/LA*E WISI
H.HY 2'-*0/59
1 !Er>ALEb
OCO'J FEET
00665
->riOS-7 JT
MG/L r>
0.080
0.040
0.050
0.030
0.04Q
0.040
0.050
0.070
0.040
0.040
0.040
-it AVENCK
'ER KESErtv/uM 100^^2
^POG 2.7 MI S* OF HE
04001004
OEPT" CLA^S JO
K VALUE ^NOW^^ TO d.£
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
bTOKET RETRIEVAL DATE /7/03/24
/T «Vu/ Ai
401581
34 52 20.0 094 36 20.0 4
OIL BWANCH
40 15 rltAVENEK
T/LAKL WISTER RESERVOIR 100991
Httv 270 8PDG 1.0 Ml S HEAVENER A60V STP
11EPALES 04001004
0000 FEEf OtPT-i CLASS 00
DATE
F30M
TO
74/11/02
74/12/17
75/01/15
75/02/13
75/03/38
75/04/22
75/05/12
75/05/22
75/06/12
75/07/08
75/08/15
75/10/07
TIMF. f
OF
UAV F
11 45
14 ?5
13 58
13 30
12 20
12 21
11 33
13 56
13 25
13 30
11 4C
14 30
FEET
C630
!s,N03
OTAL
IG/L
n.?24
0.21?
•J.I 68
O.?08
0.095
0.035
C.I 60
0.115
0.110
0.065
0.040
0.005
00625
TOT i\JEl
•M
MG/L
0.100
0.600
2.300
0.200
0.850
0.300
0.250
0*525
0.300
0.550
1.600
0.500
0,1610
NrlJ-N
TOTiL
MO/L
0.030
0.04C
0.072
0.016
0.053
0.020
0.035
0.055
0.030
0.120
0*115
0.045
00671
PnOS-i)IS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.010
0.010
0.005
0.008K
0*022
0.005*
0.010
0.005
0.005
0.005
0*020
0*005
00665
PhOS-TGT
MG/L P
0.020
0.010
0.020
0.010K
0.125
0.020
0.02C
0.010
0.020
0.020
0.030
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
bTOSET
OAT£ 77/OJ/24
/T
401582
3* 51 45.0 094 34 JO.O
OIL o"ANC~i
HO 1=
T/LA*E LISTER
1009V1
BKDG 2.6 MI SE HEAVENE* dlO STr»
llErALES
0000 TEET
DEPTM
OtCOICO'*
CLASS 00
DATE
Tu
74/11/02
74/12/17
75/01/15
75/02/13
75/03/28
75/04/2?
75/05/12
75/05/22
75/06/12
75/07/OH
75/08/15
75/10/07
OF
OAY FEET
12 ?0
14 57
14 16
13 50
12 30
12 33
11 ??
13 39
13 14
13 ?1
11 20
14 10
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.256
0.640
0.510
1.650
l.ObO
1.050
0.450
1.150
C.250
0.630
00625
TUT KjfL
N
MG/L
0.700
1.300
4.800
1.900
1 . 150
1.350
0.800
2.000
0.800
2.300
8.7SO
6.500
TOTAL
0. 100
0.26C
0.940
0.448
0.065
0.20C
O.OdO
0.770
0.095
1.250
6.550
3.900
00671
f»n05-OIS
URTrlO
MG/u P
C.120
0.375
1.400
0.390
1.570
0.360
1.150
0.210
1.950
10.300
7.500
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L r>
0.200
0.690
1.500
0.720
U.21C
1. 700
O.bOO
0.130
0.340
2.000
12.000
6.200
-------
STO*ET RETRIEVAL DATE 77/03/24
4C15C1
34 50 40.0 094 51 00.0 4
nOLSOi-j O'EEK
40 LEFLORE CO MAP
T/LAKE wISTER RESERVOIR 1009*2
RO XING 4 MI s OF SUMMERFIELO
04&01004
0000 FEET UE^Tn CLASS 00
FROM
TO
74/11/02
74/12/17
75/01/15
75/02/13
75/0 J/2rt
75/04/22
75/05/12
75/05/22
75/06/12
75/07/08
75/06/15
75/10/07
TIME OEPTr
OF
DAY FEET
10
13
12
12
11
11
12
14
14
14
12
15
20
?8
47
25
?5
35
48
32
21
14
50
35
OC630 00625
•i N02NN03 TOT KJEL
N- TOTAL N
MG/L MG/L
0.
•j •
0.
0.
t» •
0.
0.
n.
0.
0.
0.
c.
046
032
016
020
025
005
015
015
020
030
025
010
C.
0.
0.
C.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
G.
2CO
<»00
500
100
750
350
400
300
350
275
250
330
00610 00671 006b5
NM3-N PnOS-OIS PrtOi-TOT
TOTAL ORTHO
'•tG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0 .
•J.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
025
135
074
010
120
035
030
020
025
230
020
CIS
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
?
010
010
015
005
010
005
005
010
010
010
005K
010
MG/L P
0.020
0.010
0.020
0.010
0.0-^0
0.025
0.020
0.020
0.040
0.010
0.010
0.025
K V-ALUfi K.lMOWN TU 6E
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STOHET KET*IEVAL JATE 77/03/24
/TYPA/AMHNT/ST3EAM
DATE T1MF
FROM OF
TO DAY FEET
74/11/02
74/12/17
75/01/15
75/02/13
75/03/Zf)
75/P4/2?
75/05/12
75/05/22
75/06/12
75/07/08
75/08/15
75/10/07
09
13
12
11
11
11
12
14
14
14
13
16
TO
00
21
55
03
04
55
53
42
36
?5
00
401501
34 55 10.0 035 54 20.0 4
FOu^CrlE MOLINt
40 7.5 LEfLUWt.
T/LAKE LISTER SESErivOIx ID1392
2NOHV HO B*i.iG 3.* Ml NE OF L
11EPALES 0400100<*
0000 FtET OE^Tn CLASS Uu
00630
N02>.N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.02<»
0.064
u.064
0.056
0.050
0.010
0.105
0.107
0.070
0.100
0.010
0.010
00625
TUT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.700
0.700
l.OCO
0.300
1.300
1.250
0.600
0.600
0.650
0.4QO
O.P50
0.500
00610
Nf-n-K.'
TOTAL
MG/L
0.040
0.040
0.040
0.032
O.OM5
0.020
0.060
0.025
0.035
0.040
0.040
0.010
00671
r>riOS-OIS
UKTHO
MG/L P
0.050
0.020
0.035
0.024
0.025
0.010
0.020
C.022
0.025
0.015
0.015
0.012
00665
pHus-roT
MG/L ?
0.130
0.050
0.100
0.050
0.050
0.100
0.090
0.120
0.060
0.100
0.110
-------
APPENDIX E
PARAMETRIC RANKINGS OF LAKES
SAMPLED BY NES IN 1974
STATE OF OKLAHOMA
-------
£ DATA TO BE IISEO IN
LAKE
COOt LAKE NftMt
4001 A
400? ADC,i.'C"Ll:' L
4003
4.004
400S Ffrn'T CO"? rVP^t KK-.I 1
400*. FORT S
4007 FQSS PA'-'
*0(IP LAKE
4001? (jWA^D La<£ 0' THt C
4010 L&KE hEFME^
4011 KEYSTOivt RESe"KVOIR
4012 OOLOGAri
40)3
40l«.
4015 WISTE^ PESENVOIH
4834 TfXOMA
TOTAl. p INO^G N
0.
*
:•.
>>.
I.1 •
0.
o.
'' •
0.
u.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
041
02 u
-7
Obi
I>JO
"70
027
i «•?
HM7
057
136
05V
039
027
OHO
045
0
(!
0
'1
"
0
1
C
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.060
.070
.070
.4Cl<3
.110
.1V5
.090
,78o
.740
.250
.690
.560
.550
.150
.230
.160
500-
"E4N SEC
^
44-4
*5s
4*2
*S4
4S5
463
4«4
46f.
461
4fl4
4ftJ
435
46^
478
460
.625
.*00
.4UO
.513
.607
.167
.857
.333
.857
.000
.303
.000
.500
.000
.500
.875
CrILOA
14.
7.
*.
4.
14.
9.
4.
7.
6.
5.
21.
5.
6.
8.
4.
12.
•'50
027
tJO
3H3
967
733
862
973
76H
667
427
137
646
422
812
325
15-
MIM no
8.
14.
9.
14.
H.
7.
8.
a.
14.
V.
14.
14.
15.
12.
15.
14.
4 00
f-00
400
?oo
»00
BOO
400
?oo
HOO
000
900
600
000
000
000
600
015S
0
0
0
0
u
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
"EUI
.010
.008
.009
.029
.01?
.014
.006
.093
.038
.036
.096
.031
.016
.009
.016
.016
-------
OF LAKES wITH
*ALUF_^
OF LAKES WITH
"F« VALUES)
LAKE NA«F.
LAKt
CODE
4001
4002 AJB'JCKLE LAKF.
<»G03 LA*,F FLLe?wr>L FCPT CO*B ^t '£->:' )!'
4006 FOPT SUPPLY ..'tht^i/0 IrJ
4007
4QOb
4009
4010
4011
401?
4013
4014
4015
4834
LAKE
G^ANO LAKH O1 THE
LAKE HEFNEO
KEYSTONE RESF.RVOIH
OOL06AH LAKE
TENKILLEK) FEPpv
LAKE THUNDER I RD
WlSTErf HESE.-(Vi1lK
TEXOMfl LAKE
<--£Ol AN
TOTAL P
^n
100
an
20
7 5
33
93
0
13
4?
7
ttn
67
87
tl
^3
( W)
( 15)
( 1^1
( 3)
(11)
( b)
( 14)
( 0)
( 2)
( 7)
( 1)
( 6)
( 10)
( 13)
1 4)
( B)
MEDIAN
INORG N
100 (
------- |