U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
WORKING PAPER SERIES
REPORT
ON
BELTON RESERVOIR
BELL AND CORYF1L COUNTIES
TEXAS
EPA REGION VI
WORKING PAPER No, 633
CORVALLIS ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY - CORVALLIS, OREGON
and
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING & SUPPORT LABORATORY - LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
•&G.P.O. 699-440
-------
REPORT
ON
BELJON RESERVOIR
ELL AND CORYELL COUNTIES
TEXAS
EPA REGION VI
WORKING PAPER No, 633
WITH THE COOPERATION OF THE
TEXAS WATER QUALITY BOARD
AND THE
TEXAS NATIONAL GUARD
FEBRUARY, 1977
-------
CONTENTS
Page
Foreward ii
List of Texas Study Reservoirs iv
Lake and Drainage Area Map vi
Sections
I. Conclusions 1
II. Lake and Drainage Basin Characteristics 4
III. Lake Water Quality Summary 5
IV. Nutrient Loadings 11
V. Literature Reviewed 17
VI. Appendices 18
-------
n
FOREWORD
The National Eutrophication Survey was initiated in 1972 in
response to an Administration commitment to investigate the nation-
wide threat of accelerated eutrophication to freshwater lakes and
reservoirs.
OBJECTIVES
The Survey was designed to develop, in conjunction with state
environmental agencies, information on nutrient sources, concentrations,
and impact on selected freshwater lakes as a basis for formulating
comprehensive and coordinated national, regional, and state management
practices relating to point-source discharge reduction and non-point
source pollution abatement in lake watersheds.
ANALYTIC APPROACH
The mathematical and statistical procedures selected for the
Survey's eutrophication analysis are based on related concepts that:
a. A generalized representation or model relating
sources, concentrations, and impacts can be constructed.
b. By applying measurements of relevant parameters
associated with lake degradation, the generalized model
can be transformed into an operational representation of
a lake, its drainage basin, and related nutrients.
c. With such a transformation, an assessment of the
potential for eutrophication control can be made.
LAKE ANALYSIS
In this report, the first stage of evaluation of lake and water-
shed data collected from the study lake and its drainage basin is
documented. The report is formatted to provide state environmental
agencies with specific information for basin planning [§303(e)], water
quality criteria/standards review [§303(c)], clean lakes [§314(a,b)],
and water quality monitoring [§106 and §305(b)] activities mandated
by the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972.
-------
Ill
Beyond the single lake analysis, broader based correlations
between nutrient concentrations (and loading) and trophic condi-
tion are being made to advance the rationale and data base for
refinement of nutrient water quality criteria for the Nation's
fresh water lakes. Likewise, multivariate evaluations for the
relationships between land use, nutrient export, and trophic
condition, by lake class or use, are being developed to assist
in the formulation of planning guidelines and policies by EPA
and to augment plans implementation by the states.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The staff of the National Eutrophication Survey (Office of
Research & Development, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency)
expresses sincere appreciation to the Texas Water Quality Board
for professional involvement, to the Texas National Guard for
conducting the tributary sampling phase of the Survey, and to
those Texas wastewater treatment plant operators who voluntarily
provided effluent samples.
Hugh C. Yantis, Jr., Executive Director of the Texas Water
Quality Board, and John B. Latchford, Jr., Director, and the staff
of the Field Operations Division provided invaluable lake documen-
tation and counsel during the Survey, reviewed the preliminary
reports, and provided critiques most useful in the preparation of
this Working Paper series.
Major General Thomas Bishop, the Adjutant General of Texas,
and Project Officer Colonel William L. Seals, who directed the
volunteer efforts of the Texas National Guardsmen, are also grate-
fully acknowledged for their assistance to the Survey.
-------
iv
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
STUDY RESERVOIRS
State of Texas
NAME
Amistad
Bastrop
Bel ton
Braunig
Brownwood
Buchanan
Caddo
•
Calaveras
Canyon
Colorado City
Corpus Christi
Diversion
Eagle Mountain
Fort Phantom Hill
Houston
Kemp
Lake O'The Pines
Lavon
Lewisville (Garza-Little Elm)
Livingston
COUNTY
Val Verde
Bastrop
Bell, Coryell
Bexar
Brown
Burnet, Llano
Harrison, Marion, TX;
Caddo Parish, LA
Bexar
Comal
Mitchell
Jim Wells, Live Oak, San
Patricio
Archer, Baylor
Tarrant, Wise
Jones
Harris
Baylor
Camp, Marion, Morris,
Upshur
Coll in
Denton
Polk, San Jacinto, Trinity,
Walker
-------
Lyndon B. Johnson
Medina
Meredith
0. C. Fisher (San Angelo)
Palestine
Possum Kingdom
Sam Rayburn
Somervi lie
E. V. Spence
Stamford
Stillhouse Hollow
Tawakoni
Texoma
Travis
Trinidad
Twin Buttes
White River
Whitney
Wright Patman (Texarkana)
Burnet, Llano
Bandera, Medina
Hutchinson, Moore,
Potter
Tom Green
Anderson, Cherokee,
Henderson, Smith
Palo Pinto, Stephens,
Young
Angelina, Jasper
Nacogdoches, Sabine, San
Augustine
Burleson, Lee, Washington
Coke
Haskell
Bell
Hunt, Rains, Van Zandt
Cooke, Grayson TX; Bryan,
Johnston, Love, Marshall, OK
Burnet, Travis
Henderson
Tom Green
Crosby
Bosque, Hill
Bowie, Cass
-------
Map Location
BELTON RESERVOIR
® Tributary Sampling Site
X Lake Sampling Site
J Sewage Treatment Facility
o 10 20 30 Km.
s to
Scale
Hi.
Moody
Temple
3T30-
9T'00
-------
BELTON RESERVOIR
STORE! NO. 4803
I. CONCLUSIONS
A. Trophic Condition:
Survey data indicate that Bel ton Reservoir is meso-eutrophic;
i.e., moderately well supplied with nutrients an>:! productive.
Whether nutrient enrichment is beneficial or deleterious depends
on the actual or potential effect on the uses of the reservoir.
In this regard, no nuisance conditions are known to personnel
of the Texas Water Quality Board and there is little or no im-
pairment of the designated beneficial uses of Belton Reservoir.
Belton Reservoir ranked eleventh in overall trophic quality
when the 39 Texas reservoirs sampled in 1974 were compared using
a combination of six parameters*. Three of the reservoirs had
less median total phosphorus, two had less and five had the same
median dissolved orthophosphorus, 28 had less median inorganic
nitrogen, 12 had less mean chlorophyll a_, and one had greater
mean Secchi disc transparency. Marked depression of hypolimnetic
dissolved oxygen occurred at all four sampling stations in May
and August.
Survey limnologists did not observe macrophytes or algal blooms
during any sampling time, but chlorophyll ^concentrations were
somewhat high at station 4 in May, August, and November and at
station 1 in August (see page 9).
* See Appendix A.
-------
B. Rate-Limiting Nutrient:
The algal assay results indicate phosphorus was the limiting
nutrient when the assay samples were collected in May and November.
The reservoir data indicate phosphorus limitation at all sampling
times.
C. Nutrient Controllability:
1. Point sources—The phosphorus contribution of known point
sources amounted to 12.2% of the total load to Belton Reservoir
during the sampling year. Most of the point-source load was con-
tributed by Copperas Cove (8.7%) and Gatesville (2.5%).
The present phosphorus loading of 3.95 g/m2/yr is over seven
times that proposed by Vollenweider (Vollenweider and Dillon, 1974)
as a eutrophic loading (see page 16), and all phosphorus inputs
to Belton Reservoir should be minimized to the greatest practicable
degree to slow the aging of the reservoir.
2. Non-point sources--Non-point sources contributed 87.8% of
the total phosphorus load to the reservoir. The Leon River con-
tributed 16.8% of the total; Cowhouse Creek, 65.3%; and the ungaged
tributaries contributed an estimated 5.3%.
The phosphorus export rates of the Leon River and Cowhouse Creek
were 5 and 71 kg/km2/yr, respectively (see page 15). The export
rate of the Leon River compares quite well to rates of tributaries
of other Texas reservoirs, but the export rate of Cowhouse Creek
was considerably higher. This higher rate may be due to unidentified
point sources rather than to non-point source inputs. There are a
-------
number of small communities served by septic tanks that may be
impacting Cowhouse Creek, but more extensive sampling would have
to be done to establish the significance of these possible
sources.
-------
II. RESERVOIR AND DRAINAGE BASIN CHARACTERISTICS
A. Morphometry :
1. Surface area: 50.27 kilometers2.
2. Mean depth: 10.8 meters.
3. Maximum depth: >25.6 meters.
4. Volume: 545.188 x 106 m3.
5. Mean hydraulic retention time: 1.6 years (based on 1972-1976
mean outflow).
B. Tributary and Outlet:
(See Appendix C for flow data)
1. Tributaries -
Name
Leon River
Cowhouse Creek
Minor tributaries &
immediate drainage -
Drainage
area (km2)*
6,728.8
1,815.6
636.6
Total s
9,181.0
2. Outlet -
City of Killeen aqueduct
Leon River
Totals
C. Precipitation****:
1. Year of sampling: 89.1 centimeters.
2. Mean annual: 86.4 centimeters.
0.0
9.230.8
9,230.8***
Mean flow
(m3/sec)*
10.11
5.41
2.80
18.32
0.70**
16.41
17.11
***
t Table of metric conversions—Appendix B.
tt At conservation pool level; Barrows, 1977.
* For limits of accuracy, see Working Paper No. 175, "...Survey Methods,
1973-1976".
** White, 1976.
*** Includes area of reservoir; lesser outflow due to evaporation.
**** See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
III. RESERVOIR WATER QUALITY SUMMARY
Belton Reservoir was sampled four times in 1974 by means of a
pontoon-equipped Huey helicopter. Each time, samples for physical
and chemical parameters were collected from a number of depths at
four stations on the reservoir (see map, page v). During each vir>it,
a single depth-integrated (4.6 m to surface) sample was composited
from the stations for phytoplankton identification and enumeration;
and during the March and November visits, a single 18.9-liter depth-
integrated sample was composited for algal assays. Also each time,
a depth-integrated sample was collected from each of the stations
for chlorophyll a^ analysis. The maximum depths sampled were 25.3
meters at station 1, 25.6 meters at station 2, 25.3 meters at station
3, and 11.0 meters at station 4.
The sampling results are presented in full in Appendix D and are
summarized in the following table (the August nutrient samples were
not preserved properly and were not analyzed).
-------
PARAMETER
TEMP 1C)
DISS OXY (MG/L)
CNOCTVY (MCROMO)
PH (STAND UNITS)
TOT ALK (MG/D
TOT P (MG/L)
ORTHO P (MG/L)
N02»N03 (MG/L)
AMMONIA (MG/L)
KJEL N (MG/L)
INORG N (MG/L)
TOTAL N (MG/L)
CHLRPYL A (UG/D
SECCHI (METERS)
A. SUMMARY OF PHYSICAL AND
1ST SAMPLING ( 3/13/74)
4 SITES
RANGE
11.6 - 18.9
7.0 - 9.8
335. - 435.
7.9 - 8.4
144. - 158.
0.008 - 0.123
0.004 - 0.014
0.120 - 0.220
0.020 - 0.100
0.200 - 0.500
0.140 - 0.300
0.360 - 0.700
1.1 - 3.2
3.0 - 6.1
MEAN
16.0
8.3
378.
-8.2
149.
0.018
0.008
0.162
0.035
0.335
0.197
0.497
1.7
5.0
MEDIAN
16. a
9.0
378.
8.3
147.
0.011
O.OOU
0.160
0.030
0.300
0.190
0.460
1.3
5.5
CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTIC;. FOR ttELTOU RESERVOIR
STORET CODE 4803
2ND SAMPLING ( 5/20/74)
4 SITES
RANGE
13.9 - 26.9
0.1 - «.6
356. - 498.
MEAN MEDIAN
22.4 24.3
4.6
431.
7.5 - 8.5
130. - 152.
0.011 - 0.075
0.003 - 0.009
0.050 - 0.300
0.020 - 0.110
0.300 - 0.800
0.080 - 0.380
0.450 - 0.900
3.2 - 24.9
1.1 - 2.4
8.1
142.
0.022
0.006
0.143 0.120
0.050 0.040
0.400
0.457
0.193
4.4
428.
8.1
145.
0.017
0.006
0.160
0.600 0.600
10.4 6.8
2.0 2.3
3*0 SAMPLING ( 8/14/74)
<4 SITES
RANGE
15.4 - 29.2
0.0 - 7.6
381. - 480.
7.5 - 8.5
MEAN MEDIAN
24.8 27.3
3.8 5.2
443. 451.
8.0 8.0
oooooo -oooooooooooooooooooooo
ooooao -oooooooooooooaoooooooo
oooooo -oooooooooooooooooooooo
oooooo -oooooooooooooooooooooo
«oo*oo -oooooooooooooooaoooooo
oooooo _oooooooo«ooooooooooooo
O « O O 4 O _eO0e<»ae»«aOOO«ee.te«e4e
000000 -00000000000000000>0000
4.8 - 35.0 14.5 9.1
2.2 - 5.2 3.5 3.4
-------
A. SUMMARY OF PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS FOhi eitLTON HESEHVOM
STORET CODE 4803
4TH SAMPLING 111/ 1/74)
PAWAMETER
TEMP (C)
OISS OXY (MG/L)
CNDCTVY (MCROMO)
PH 0
iO
0
0
5
3
SITES
MEAN
21.0
6.9
320.
7.9
118.
0.069
0.016
0.191
0.044
0.4?2
0.23^
0.613
5.4
1.3
MEDIAN
21.1
6.8
3*3.
7.8
127.
0.02U
0.011
0.14U
0.030
0.400
0.170
0.<«8U
3.0
2.1
-------
B. Biological characteristics:
1. Phytoplankton -
Sampling
Date
03/13/74
05/20/74
08/14/74
11/01/74
Dominant
Genera
1. Chroomonas sp.
2. cryptomorias sp.
3. Scenedesmus sp.
4. Pennate diatoms
5. Sphaerocystis sp.
Total
1. pocystis s£.
2. Microcystis sp.
3. coelastrurfTsp.
4. Dinobryon S£.
5. Chroomona's s£.
Uther genera
Total
1. Raphidiopsis sp.
2. Anabaenopsis sp.
3. uscniatoria sp.
4. Garten'a sp.
5. Rennate diatoms
Other genera
Total
1. Chroomonas sp.
2. MerismopeHia sp.
3. AnabaenopsTT sp.
4. Dactylococcopsis sp.
5. Raphidiopsis sp.
Other genera
Algal Units
per ml
539
135
67
34
34
809
5,268
2,433
Total
2,382
-------
2. Chlorophyll a_ -
Sampling
Date
03/13/74
05/20/74
08/14/74
11/01/74
Station
Number
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
. 1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
C. Limiting Nutrient Study:
1. Autoclaved, filtered, and nutrient spiked -
a. March sample -
Spike (mg/1)
Control
0.050 P
0.050 P + 1.0 N
1.0 N
Ortho P
Cone, (mg/1)
0.005
0.055
0.055
0.005
b. November sample -
Spike (mg/1)
Control
0.050 P
0.050 P + 1.0 N
1.0 N
Ortho P
Cone, (mg/1)
0.005
0.055
0.055
0.005
Inorganic N
Cone, (mg/1)
0.223
0.223
1.223
1.223
Inorganic N
Cone, (mg/1)
0.132
0.132
1.132
1.132
Chlorophyll a
(yg/D
1.1
1.3
1.4
3.2
3.2
7.4
6.3
24.9
35.0
5.7
4.8
12.5
1.4
3.9
3.8
12.5
Maximum yield
(mg/l-dry wt.)
0.1
0.6
5.4
0.1
Maximum yield
(mg/l-dry wt.)
0.3
4.1
16.5
0.2
-------
10
2. Discussion -
The control yields of the assay alga, Selenastrum capri-
cornutum, indicate that the potential primary productivity
of Belton Reservoir was low at the times the assay samples
were collected. Both assays yielded similar results. There
was a significant growth response when phosphorus was added
alone, but no change in yield occurred with the addition of
only nitrogen. These results indicate that phosphorus was
limiting at the times of sample collection (03/13/74 and
11/01/74).
The reservoir data substantiate the assay findings. The
mean inorganic nitrogen to orthophosphorus ratios were 25 to 1
in March, 32 to 1 in May, and 15 to 1 in November.
-------
11
IV. NUTRIENT LOADINGS
(See Appendix E for data)
For the determination of nutrient loadings, the Texas National
Guard collected monthly near-surface grab samples from each of the
tributary sites indicated on the map (page vi), except for the months
of April and May when two samples were collected. Sampling was begun
in September, 1974, and was completed in August, 1975.
Through an interagency agreement, stream flow estimates for the
year of sampling and a "normalized" or average year were provided by
the Texas District Office of the U.S. Geological Survey for the
tributary sites nearest the lake.
In this report, nutrient loads for sampled tributaries were
calculated using mean annual concentrations and mean annual flows.
Nutrient loads shown are those measured minus point-source loads, if any.
Nutrient loads for unsampled "minor tributaries and immediate
drainage" ("ZZ" of U.S.G.S.) were estimated using the mean concentra-
tions in the Leon River at station A-2 and the mean annual ZZ flow.
The operators of the Copperas Cove and Moody wastewater treatment
plants provided monthly effluent samples and corresponding flow data.
The communities of Gatesville and Morgan's Point did not participate;
nutrient loads were estimated at 1.134 kg P and 3.401 kg N/capita/year,
and flows were estimated at 0.3785 m3/capita/day.
-------
12
A. Waste Sources:
1. Known municipal
Name
Pop.
Served
Copperas Cove
NE
NW
Moody
Gatesville*
Morgan's Point**
10,000
7,
1
4,
500
286
400
160
Treatment
Mean Flow
(m'/d)
stab, pond
stab, pond
Imhoff tank
tr. filter
3,064.0
1,900.9
447.1
1,665.4
60.6
Receiving
Water
House Creek
House Creek
Stampede Creek
Leon River
Bel ton Reservoir
2. Known industrial - None
t Treatment plant questionnaires.
* Anonymous, 1971.
** Wyatt, 1976.
-------
13
B. Annual Total Phosphorus Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
kg P/ % of
Source yr total
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
Leon River 33,270 16.8
Cowhouse Creek 129,665 65.3
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non-point load) - 10,595 5.3
c. Known municipal STP's -
Copperas Cove
NE 10,525 5.3
NW 6,795 3.4
Moody 1,720 0.9
Gatesville 4,990 2.5
Morgan's Point 180 0.1
d. Septic tanks* - 50 <0.1
e. Known industrial - None
f. Direct precipitation** - 870 0.4
Total 198,660 100.0
2. Outputs -
Lake outlet - Killeen aqueduct 375
Leon River 17,080
Total 17,455
3. Net annual P accumulation - 181,205 kg.
* Estimate based on 120 lakeshore dwellings, nine parks, and one campground;
see Working Paper No. 175.
** See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
14
C. Annual Total Nitrogen Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
kg N/ % of
Source y_r total
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
Leon River 470,930 49.4
Cowhouse Creek 235,100 24.6
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non-point load) - 134,570 14.1
c. Known municipal STP's -
Copperas Cove
NE 21,565 2.3
NW 15,115 1.6
Moody 5,380 0.6
Gatesville 14,965 1.6
Morgan's Point 545 <0.1
d. Septic tanks* - 1,945 0.2
e. Known industrial - None
f. Direct precipitation** - 53.740 5.6
Total 953,855 100.0
2. Outputs -
Lake outlet - Killeen aqueduct 13,620
Leon River 467,310
Total 480,930
3. Net annual N accumulation - 472,925 kg.
* Estimatebased on 120 lakeshore dwellings, nine parks, and one campground,
see Working Paper No. 175.
** See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
15
D. Non-point Nutrient Export by Subdrainage Area:
Tributary kg P/km2/yr kg N/km2/yr
Leon River 5 70
Cowhouse Creek 71 129
E. Mean Nutrient Concentrations in Ungaged Stream:
Mean Total P Mean Total N
Tributary Cone, (mg/1) Cone, (mg/1)
Owl Creek 0.013 0.991
-------
16
F. Yearly Loads:
In the following table, the existing phosphorus loadings
are compared to those proposed by Vollenweider (Vollenweider
and Dillon, 1974). Essentially, his "dangerous" loading is
one at which the receiving water would become eutrophic or
remain eutrophic; his "permissible" loading is that which
would result in the receiving water remaining oligotrophic
or becoming oligotrophic if morphometry permitted. A meso-
trophic loading would be considered one between "dangerous"
and "permissible".
Note that Vollenweider's model may not be applicable to
water bodies with short hydraulic retention times.
Total Phosphorus Total Nitrogen
Total Accumulated Total Accumulated
grams/mVyr 3.95 3.60 19.0 9.4
Vollenweider phosphorus loadings
(g/m2/yr) based on mean depth and mean
hydraulic retention time of Bel ton Reservoir:
"Dangerous" (eutrophic loading) 0.52
"Permissible" (oligotrophic loading) 0.26
-------
17
V. LITERATURE REVIEWED
Anonymous, 1971. Inventory of municipal waste facilities. EPA
Publ. OWP-1, vol. 6, Wash., DC.
Barrows, David, 1977. Personal communication (reservoir morphometry
and hydraulic retention time). Canyon Proj. Off., Fort Worth
Distr., Corps of Engrs., New Braunfels, TX.
Vollenweider, R. A., and P. J. Dillon, 1974. The application of the
phosphorus loading concept to eutrophication research. Natl. Res.
Council of Canada Publ. No. 13690, Canada Centre for Inland Waters,
Burlington, Ontario.
White, Carl, 1976. Personal communication (municipal water withdrawal
from Bel ton Reservoir). Killeen.
Wyatt, Linda B., 1976. Personal communication (point sources impacting
Bel ton Reservoir). TX Water Qual. Bd., Austin.
-------
18
VI. APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
LAKE RANKINGS
-------
LJ.KE O*TA TO BE 'JSEo IN PANKINGS
LAKE
CODE LAKE NAME
4801 AMISTAD LAKE
4802 BASTROP LAKE
4603 8ELTON RESERVOIR
4804 BRAUNIG LAKE
4805 8ROWNWOOD LAKE
4806 LAKE 81ICHANAN
4807 CADDO LAKE
4808 CALAVERAS LAKE
4809 CANYON RESERVOIR
4810 LAKE COLORADO CITY
4811 CORPUS CRISTI LAKE
4812 DIVERSION LAKE
4813 EAGLE MOUNTAIN LAKE
4814 FT PHANTOM HILL LAKE
4815 GARZA LITTLE ELM RESEKVO
4816 KEMP LAKE
4817 HOUSTON LAKE
4818 LAKE OF THE PINES
4819 LAVON RESERVOIR
4820 LIVINGSTON LAKE
4821 LYNDON B JOHNSON LAKE
4822 MEDINA LAKE
4823 LAKE MEREDITH
4824 PALESTINE LAKE
4825 POSSUM KINGDOM RESERVOIR
4826 SAN ANGELO RESERVOIR
4827 SAM RAYBURN RESERVOIR
4828 E V SPENCE RESERVOIR
MEDIAN
TOTAL P
0.013
0.02?
0.016
0.134
0.027
0.036
0.055
0.033
0.010
0.042
0.113
0.025
0.024
0.060
0.045
0.023
0.097
0.031
0.063
0.196
0.042
0.010
0.021
0.031
0.023
0.098
0.029
0.036
MEDIAN
INO^G N
0.500
0.090
0.165
0.150
0.100
0.250
0.070
0.060
0.450
0.090
0.130
0.080
0.070
0.105
0.380
0.110
0.260
0.090
0.180
0.555
0.420
0.600
0.07Q
o.iao
0.070
0.140
0.150
0.080
500-
MEAN SEC
371.474
419.917
378.312
461.625
470.375
437.625
463.333
461.667
384.812
473.625
475.187
470.111
469.625
474.909
475.782
455.000
486.187
440.000
485.333
465.469
456.500
403.562
439.312
442.625
419.045
481.000
439.458
4^2.583
MEAN
CrtLORA
2.' ->2
12.392
8.025
22.762
4.887
8.606
14.808
22.500
2.500
12.675
19.756
15.867
5.662
6.317
14.156
10.217
16.650
12.919
5.400
16.112
8.100
12.944
3.037
10.619
9.495
24.675
6.267
11.775
15-
MIN oo
14.900
15.000
15.000
14.800
14.400
15.000
11.400
13.000
14.800
10.200
14.000
9.000
11.000
9.800
14.600
10.400
12.400
15.000
8.800
c 15.000
14.900
15.000
14.400
14.800
15.000
10.200
15.000
15.000
MEDIAN
DISS (WHO
0.009
0.007
0.007
0.062
0.007
0.012
0.01 J
0.007
0.006
0.012
0.050
0.009
0.008
0.022
0.018
0.007
0.036
0.011
0.018
0.128
0.013
0.004
0.009
0.010
0.009
0.011
0.009
0.008
-------
LAKE DATA TO BE USED IN BANKINGS
LAKE
CODE LAKE NAME
4829 SOMERVILLE LAKE
«»830 STAMFORD LAKE
4631 STILLHOUSE HOLLO* RESE*V
4832 TAWAKOM LAKE
4833 TEXARKANA LAKE
4834 TEXOMA LAKE
4835 TRAVIS LAKE
4836 TRINIDAD
4837 TWIN 8UTTES RESERVOIR
4838 WHITE RIVER RESERVOIR
4839 WHITNEY LAKE
MEDIAN
TOTAL P
0.053
0.073
O.Olb
0.046
0.106
0.042
0.018
0.389
0.029
0.020
0.028
MEDIAN
0.115
0.060
0.160
0.100
0.120
0.160
0.250
0.110
0.250
0.110
0.120
500-
MEAN SEC
473. B33
482.714
406.250
466.417
47b.500
451.321
389.913
479.500
454.917
434.500
430.500
MEAN
CMLORA
24.4*1
18.457
3.917
18.246
19.119
12.493
5.595
24.300
8.708
4.333
6.912
MIN DO
13.000
10.600
15.000
13.200
12.400
15.000
15.000
10.000
14.800
15.000
15.000
MEOMN
DISS 'JHTHO
0.01 3
0.012
0.010
0.013
0.030
0.018
0.007
0.240
0.009
0.009
0.006
-------
or LAKES WITH
VALUES (NUMBER OF L«KES WITH
LAKE
COOE LAKE NAME
4801 AMISTAD LAKE
4«02 HASTROP LAKE
4803 8ELTON RESERVOIR
4fl04 SRAUNIG LAKE
4805 BROWNWOOD LAKE
4806 LAKE BUCHANAN
4807 CADOO LAKE
4808 CALAVERAS LAKE
4609 CANYON RESERVOIR
4810 LAKE COLORADO CITY
4811 CORPUS CRIST! LAKE
4812 DIVERSION LAKE
4813 EAGLE MOUNTAIN LAKE
4814 FT PHANTOM HILL LAKE
4815 GARZA LITTLE ELM RESERVO
4816 KEMP LAKE
4817 HOUSTON LAKE
4818 LAKE OF THE PINES
4819 LAVON RESERVOIR
4830 LIVINGSTON LAKE
4831 LYNDON B JOHNSON LAKE
4822 MEDINA LAKE
4623 LAKE MEREDITH
4824 PALESTINE LAKE
4825 POSSUM KINGDOM RESERVOIR
4826 SAN ANGELO RESERVOIR
4827 SAM RAYBURN RESERVOIR
4828 E V SPENCE RESERVOIR
MEDIAN
TOTAL P
95
79
92
5
66
47
26
45
99
39
8
68
71
24
34
76
16
54
21
3
39
99
82
54
74
13
59
50
( 36)
( 30)
( 35)
( 2)
( 25)
( 18)
( 10)
( 17)
( 37)
< 14)
( 3)
< 26)
< 27)
( 9)
( 13)
( 29)
( 6)
( 20)
( 8)
( 1)
( 14)
( 37)
( 3D
( 20)
( 2fii
( 5)
( 22)
< 19)
MEDIAN
IN03G N
5
76
26
42
70
21
91
100
8
76
47
83
91
66
13
61
16
76
29
3
11
0
91
32
91
45
39
8?
( 2)
( 28)
( 10)
( 16)
( 26)
( 7)
( 33)
( 38)
( 3)
( 28)
( 18)
( 31)
( 33)
( 25)
( 5)
( 22)
( 6)
( 28)
( 11)
( 1)
( 4)
( 0)
( 33)
( 12)
( 33)
( 17)
( 15)
( 3D
500-
MEAN 5EC
100
82
97
50
29
74
42
47
95
26
18
32
34
21
16
55
0
66
3
39
53
89
71
63
84
8
68
45
( 38)
( 3D
( 37)
( 19)
( ID
( 28)
( 16)
( 18)
( 36)
( 10)
( 7)
< 12)
( 13)
( 8)
( 6)
( 21)
( 0)
( 25)
( 1)
( 15)
( 20)
( 34)
( 27)
( 24)
( 3?)
( 3)
( 26)
( 17)
MEAN
CHLOrIA
100
47
68
8
87
63
32
11
97
42
13
29
79
74
34
55
24
39
84
26
66
37
• 95
53
S3
0
76
50
( 38)
( 18)
( 26)
( 3)
( 33)
( 24)
( 12)
( 4)
( 37)
( 16)
( 5)
( ID
( 30)
( 28)
( 13)
( 2D
( 9)
( 15)
( 32)
( 10)
( 25)
( 14)
( 36)
( 20)
( 22)
( 0)
( 29)
( 19)
16-
MIN (JO
39
17
17
49
58
17
76
67
49
38
61
97
79
95
55
84
72
17
100
17
39
17
39
49
17
88
17
17
(' 14)
< 0)
( 0)
( 17)
( 22)
( 0)
( 29)
( 25)
( 17)
( 33)
( 23)
( 37)
( 30)
( 36)
( 21)
( 32)
( 27)
I 0)
< 38)
( 0)
( 14)
( 0)
( 14)
( 17)
( 01
( 33'
( 0)
( 0)
MEDIAN
DISS UKThG P
63
92
84
5
84
39
30
92
97
39
a
63
76
16
21
92
11
46
21
3
30
100
63
51
63
46
63
76
( 21)
( 34)
( 3D
( 2)
( 3D
( 14)
( 10) .
( 34)
( 37)
( 14)
< 3)
< 21)
( 28)
( 6)
( 7)
( 34)
( 4)
( 17)
( 7)
( 1)
( 10)
( 38)
( 21)
( 19)
( 21)
< 17)
( 21)
( 28)
INDEX
NO
402
393
3«4
159
394
261
297
362
445
310
155
372
430
296
173
423
139
298
258
91
238
342
441
302
387
200
322
321
-------
PERCENT OF LAKES WITH HIGHER VALUES (NUMBER OF LAKES «ITH HIGHER VALUES)
LAKE
CODE LAKE NAME
4829 SOMERVILLE LAKE
4830 STAMFORD LAKE
4831 STILLHOUSE HOLLOW RESEfiV
4832 TAWAKOM LAKE
4833 TEXARKANA LAKE
«
4834 TEXOMA LAKE
4835 TRAVIS LAKE
4836 TKINIOAD
4837 TWIN BUTTES RESERVOIR
4838 WHITE RIVER RESERVOIR
4839 WHITNEY LAKE
MEDIAN
TOTAL P
29
18
88
32
11
39
86
0
59
84
63
< 11)
( 7)
( 33)
( 12)
( 4)
( 14)
( 33)
< 0)
< 22)
( 32)
( 24)
MEDIAN
INO^G N
55
V7
37
70
51
34
21
61
21
61
51
( 21)
( 37)
( 14)
( 26)
( 19)
( 13)
( 7)
( 22)
( 7)
( 22)
( 19)
500-
MEAN
24
5
B7
37
13
61
92
11
58
76
79
SEC
( 9)
< 2)
( 33)
( 14)
( 5)
( 23)
( 35)
( 4)
( 22)
( 29)
( 30)
MEAN
CHLORA
3
18
92
21
16
45
82
5
61
89
71
( 1)
( 7)
( 35)
( 8)
( 6)
( 17)
( 3D
( 2)
( 23)
( 34)
( 27)
15- MEDIAN
MIN DO DISS U*>THO H
67
82
17
63
72
17
17
92
49
17
17
( 251
< 31)
( 0)
( 24)
( 27)
( 0)
( 0)
( 35)
< 17) -
( 0)
( 0)
30
39
51
30
13
21
84
0
63
63
76
( 10)
( 14)
( 19)
( 10)
( 5)
( 7)
( 31)
( 0)
( 21)
( 21)
( 28)
INJEX
NO
20e
259
372
2^3
176
217
J84
169
311
390
357
-------
LAKES RANKED 8Y INDEX NUS.
RANK LAKE CODE LAKE NAME INDEX NO
i 4809 CANYON RESERVOIR 445
2 4823 LAKE MEREDITH 441
3 4813 EAGLE MOUNTAIN LAKE 430
4 4816 KEMP LAKE 423
5 4801 AMISTAO LAKE 402
6 4805 BROnNWOOD LAKE 394
7 4802 BASTRUP LAKE 393
8 4838 WHITE RIVEK RESERVOIR 390
9 4825 POSSUM KINGDOM RESERVOIR 387
10 4835 TRAVIS LAKE 384
11 4803 BELTON RESERVOIR 384
12 4831 STILLHOUSE HOLLOW RESERV 372
13 4812 DIVERSION LAKE 372
14 480tt CALAVERAS LAKE 362
15 4839 WHITNEY LAKE 357
16 4822 MEDINA LAKE 342
17 4827 SAM RAYBURN RESERVOIR 322
18 4828 E V SPENCE RESERVOIR 321
19 4837 TWIN 6UTTES RESERVOIR 311
t
20 4810 LAKE COLORADO CITY 310
21 4824 PALESTINE LAKE 302
22 4818 LAKE OF THE PINES 298
23 4807 CADOO LAKE 297
24 4814 FT PHANTOM HILL LAKE 296
25 4806 LAKE BUCHANAN 261
26 4830 STAMFORD LAKE 259
27 4819 LAVON RESERVOIR 256
28 4832 TAWAKONI LAKE 253
-------
LAKES RANKED BY INDEX NOS.
RANK LAKE CODE LAKE NAME INDEX NO
29 4tt21 LYNDON B JOHNSON LAKE 238
30 4834 TEXOMA LAKE 217
31 4829 SOMERVILLE LAKE 208
32 4826 SAN ANGELO HESERVOIR 200
33 4833 TEXAKKANA LAKE 176
34 4815 GARZA LITTLE ELM RESERvO 173
35 4836 TRINIDAD 169
36 4804 BRAUNIG LAKE 159
37 4811 CORPUS CRISTI LAKE 155
38 4817 HOUSTON LAKE 139
39 4820 LIVINGSTON LAKE 91
-------
APPENDIX B
CONVERSION FACTORS
-------
CONVERSION FACTORS
Hectares x 2.471 = acres
Kilometers x 0.6214 = miles
Meters x 3.281 = feet
Cubic meters x 8.107 x 10 = acre/feet
Square kilometers x 0.3861 = square mil-es
Cubic meters/sec x 35.315 = cubic feet/sec
Centimeters x 0.3937 = inches
«
Kilograms x 2.205 = pounds
Kilograms/square kilometer x 5.711 = Ibs/square mile
-------
APPENDIX C
TRIBUTARY FLOW DATA
-------
TRIBUTARY FLO* FNru&MAl ION FOR
03/i*>/76
LAKE CODE 4303
6ELTON RESERVOIR
TOTAL ORAINAGE AREA OF LAKE(SO KM) 9230.8
SUB-DRAINAGE
TRIBUTARY AREAfSQ KM) JAN
FEfl
MAP
APR
MAY
NORMALIZED FLOWS(CMS)
JUN JUL AUG
SEP
OCT
NUV
DEC
MEAN
4803A1
4803A2
480301
4803ZZ
9?30.8
6728.8
1815.6
686.3
12.43
8.72
5.49
2.69
14.53
10.28
5.78
2.94
20.61
8.83
5.78
2.75
16.57
12.60
7.05
3.54
28.01
33.70
16.99
8.92
32.56
10.93
3.62
2.29
20. 6«
6.46
2.01
1.33
7.65
2.15
1.50
0.74
4.67
4.42
2.80
1.33
15.77
13.28
7.45
3.82
13. d2
5.15
3.06
1.56
9.49
4.59
3.31
1.61
10.41
10.11
5.41
2.80
SUMMARY
TOTAL ORAINAGE AREA OF LAKE = 9230.8
SUM OF SUB-DRAINAGE AREAS = 9230.7
TOTAL FLOW IN
TOTAL FLOW OUT
219.4B
196.75
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND OAILY FLOWS
-------
TRIBUTARY FLOw INFOKMirION KO& TEXAS
03,'16/76
LA
-------
APPENDIX D
PHYSICAL and CHEMICAL DATA
-------
S70WE.T «£TRi;r\,AL iATE
U
480J01
31 06 24.0 097 28 31.0
bELTON SE'^RVOIR
48027 TEXAS
DATE TIME DEPTH
FROM OF
TO DAY FEET
74/03/13
13
13
10
10
13 10
13 10
10
10
74/05/20
13
13
14 50
14 50
14 50
14 50
14 50
14 50
74/08/14 14 50
14 50
14 50
14 50
14 50
14 40
14 40
14 40
14 40
14 40
14 40
74/11/01
0000
0010
0020
0040
0060
0073
0000
0005
0020
0030
0050
0077
0000
0020
0035
0055
0073
0000
0005
0020
0040
0060
0083
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
16.8
16.8
16.7
14.a
12.2
11.6
24.1
23.8
23.6
21.8
17.1
13.9
28.3
27.7
26.9
16.8
15.4
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
21.
11EPALES
00300
DO
MG/L
9.6
9.6
9.8
9.6
9.0
8.6
7.0
7.0
4.4
2.8
6.4
6.4
5.2
0.2
0.2
7.2
6.8
6.4
6.4
6.8
00077 00094
TRANSP CNOUCTVY
SECChI FIELD
INCHES MICROMHO
240 374
374
372
356
335
343
95 428
421
420
408
378
356
205 465
451
439
392
381
84 369
369
369
369
371
371
3
00400
PH
SU
8.35
8.35
8.30
8.20
8.15
8.10
8.50
8.50
8.20
8.20
7.75
7.70
8.50
8.40
8.00
7.80
7.90
7.85
7.85
7.81
7.81
7.81
7.79
21]
11202
0078 FEET DEPTH
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
145
144
145
144
145
145
140
140
145
143
148
152
131
132
132
127
129
130
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.020
0.020
0.020
0.030
0.040
0.050
0.040
0.020
0.030
0.040
0.040
0.040
0.050
0.030
0.020
0.040
0.030
0.020
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.300
0.400
0.300
' 0.300
0.300
0.300
0.800
0.400
0.400
0.400
0.400
0.300
0.600
0.400
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.400
00630
N02fcN03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.150
0.150
0.150
0.160
0.150
0.160
0.100
0.070
0.120
0.120
0.210
0.300
0.160
0.130
0.130
0.140
0.130
0.130
00671
PHOS-OIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.010
0.011
0.011
Q. 008
0.014
0.012
0.009
0.009
0.007
0.008
0.006
0.005
0.009
0.006
0.005
0.005
0.012
0.013
-------
STOftET RETRIEVAL GAIT
480301
31 06 24.0 097 28 31.0
BELTOM RE ERVOIR '
48027 TEXAS
11EPALES
3
2111202
0078 FEET
DEPTH
DATE
FROM
TO
7^/03/13
74/05/20
74/08/14
74/11/01
00665 32217 00031
TIME DEPTH PHOS-TOT CHLRPHYL INCDT LT
OF A REMNING
DAY FEET
13
13
13
13
13
13
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
10
10
10
10
10
10
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
0000
0010
0020
0040
0060
0073
0000
0005
0020
0030
0050
0077
0000
0033
0045
0000
0001
0005
0014
0020
0040
0060
0083
MG/L P
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.008
.010
.'009
.010
.009
.013
.019
.017
.016
.017
.0'16
.018
.0'28
.014
t
.013
.013
.0*13
.013
UG/L PERCENT
1.1
3.2
35.0
5.0
1.0
1.4
50.0
1.0
-------
bTOPLT RETRIEVAL DATE 76/02/1J
430302
31 08 42.0 097 31 44.0
BEL TON RE-'IRVOIR
48027 TEXAS
DATE
FROM
TO
74/03/13
74/05/20
74/08/14
74/11/01
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
13 45 0000
13 45 0005
13 45 0015
13 45 0035
13 45 0061
15 20 0000
15 20 0005
15 20 0018
15 20 0055
15 20 0084
15 40 0000
15 40 0015
15 40 0030
15 40 0040
15 40 0049
15 15 0000
15 15 0005
15 15 0015
15 15 0025
15 15 0045
15 15 0066
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
17.6
17.5
17.3
14.6
12.3
26.9
26.0
25.5
16.8
14.2
29.2
28.3
27.3
24.3
19.0
21.6
21.6
21.5
21.4
21.2
20.2
11EPALES
00300
00
MG/L
9.0
9.0
8.0
e.o
2.6
4.4
0.3
7.2
7.6
5.2
0.2
0.4
7.8
7.8
7.8
6.8
6.0
6.4
00077 00094
TRANSP CNOUCTVY
SECCHI FIELD
INCHES MICHOMHO
20<» 381
382
381
355
342
85 431
425
424
375
372
134 468
456
443
440
411
84 369
369
369
371
367
167
-3
00400
PH
SU
8.35
8.35
8.35
8.20
8.00
8.50
B.30
7.80
7.70
7.55
8.40
8.40
8.00
7.50
7.50
8.05
8.03
7.95
7.87
7.73
7.83
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
147
148
147
146
146
136
133
146
146
148
131
130
130
128
126
88
2111202
00e>6
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.020
0.020
0.030
0.030
0.060
0.050
0.040
0.040
0.050
0.090
0.020K
0.020K
0.020
0.030
0.020
0.140
FEET DEPTH
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.400
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.700
0.400
0.300
0.400
0.400
0.300
0.200
0.300
0.200
0.200
1.200
00630
N02tkN03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.120
0.120
0.130
0.160
0.180
0.080
0.060
0.270
0.270
0.290
0.120
0.120
0.120
0.120
0.150
0.120
00671
PHOS-OIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.010
0.011
0.009
0.007
0.006
0.004
0.004
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.011
0.013
0.014
0.006
0.006
0.038
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STOKET RETRIEVAL OATf. 76/02/11
480303
31 08 43.0 097 31
BEtTON KE'i'KVOIR
48027 TEAAS
DATE
FROM
TO
74/03/13
74/05/20
74/08/1**
74/11/01
00665 32217 00031
TIME DEPTH PHOS-TOT CHLRPHYL INCOT LT
OF A REMNING
DAY FEET
13
13
13
13
13
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
45
45
45
45
45
20
20
20
?Q
20
40
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
0000
0005
0015
0035
0061
0000
0005
0018
0055
0084
0000
0000
0001
0005
0015
0025
0045
0066
MG/L P
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
3.
0.
C,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.
0,
0.
0,
.009
.015
.013
.011
.010
.013
.013
.012
.011
.031
,018
.015
.025
.015
.016
.300
UG/L PERCENT
1.3
7.4
5.7
3.9
50.0
1.0
11EPALES
3
2111202
0066 FEET
OEPTH
-------
STOStl RETRIEVAL DATtl 76/02.-'il
480303
31 09 08.0 097 30 19.0
BELTON RE
48027 TEXAS
DATE
FROM
TO
74/03/13
74/05/20
74/08/15
"\
74/11/01
TIME
OF
DAY
14
14
14
14
14
15
15
15
15
15
15
10
10
10
10
10
10
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
18
18
18
18
18
50
50
50
50
50
50
15
15
15
15
15
15
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
DEPTH
FEET
0000
0010
0020
0040
0073
0000
0005
0020
0025
0050
0076
0000
0020
0030
0039
0060
0075
0000
0005
0015
0030
0050
0075
0083
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
18.0
17.7
17.3
13.9
12.3
26.0
25.6
24.9
24.3
17.4
14.6
28.7
28.0
27.3
25.0
16.8
15.9
21.5
21.5
21.4
21.4
21.3
19.6
19.2
00300
DO
MG/L
8.6
9.0
7.0
8.4
7.5
4.6
0.1
0.2
7.4
5.6
1.4
0.4
0.0
0.0
7.2
7.6
6.8
6.2
5.8
6.6
6.8
00077 00094
TRANSP CNDUCTVY
SECCHI FIELD
INCHES MICROMHO
228 393
391
388
355
352
95 437
433
428
498
457
461
135 467
467
468
441
399
397
90 363
363
361
361
355
177
157
llE^t
3
00400
PH
SU
8.35
8.35
8.35
8.20
7.9Q
8.50
8.45
8.15
7.80
7.60
7.60
8.30
8.10
7.80
7.60
7.70
7.60
7.91
7.91
7.89
7.77
7.71
7.83
7.91
00410
T 6LK
CAC03
MG/L
147
147
149
149
148
130
131
135
146
151
151
126
126
128
128
127
87
77
211
0078
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.100
0.030
0.040
0.030
0.030
0.090
0.110
0.030
0.020
0.020
0.030
0.030
0.080
0.100
1202
FEET DEPTH
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.200
0.500
0.600
0.400
0.400
0.400
0.400
0.500
0.400
0.200
0.200
0.400
0.300
0.500
0.700
00630
N02&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.160
0.160
0.170
0.160
0.200
0.060
0.060
0.060
0.220
0.200
0.200
0.160
0.150
0.150
0.160
0.180
0.670
0.810
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.004
0.011
0.006
0.005
0.008
0.003
0.008
0.006
0.008
0.005
0.007
0.006
0.005
0.006
0.014
0.010
0.045
0.057
-------
STOrtET RETRIEVAL DAVE 76/02/11
480303
31 09 08.0 097 30 19.0
6ELTON RE
48027 TEx.AS
DATE
FROM
TO
74/03/13
74/05/20
74/08/15
74/11/01
00665
TIME DEPTH PHOS-TOT
OF
DAY
14
14
14
14
14
15
15
15
15
15
15
10
10
1
1
1
1
1
1
11
11
FEET
18 0000
18 0010
18 0020
18 0040
18 0073
50 0000
50 0005
50 0020
50 0025
50 0050
50 0076
15 0000
15 0033
30 0000
30 0001
30 0005
30 0015
30 0030
30 0050
30 0075
30 0083
M6/L P
0.011
0.011
0.011
0.012
0.123
0.014
0.015
O.Olb
0.042
O.Olti
0.075
0.024
0.018
0.020
0.019
0.040
0.197
0.311
32217 00031
CHLRPHYL INCDT LT
A REMNING
UG/L PERCENT
1.4
6.3
4.8
1.0
3.8
50.0
1.0
HE^ALES
3
2111202
0078 FEET
DEPTH
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL OATE 76/02/11
480304
31 12 18.0 097 30 18.0
8ELTON RET'RVOIR
48027 TEXAS
11EPALES
3
OATE
FROM
TO
74/03/13
74/05/20
74/08/15
74/11/01
OATE
FROM
TO
74/03/13
74/05/20
74/08/15
74/11/01
TIME. DEPTH
or
DAY FEET
14 50 0000
14 50 0005
14 50 0015
14 50 0022
16 15 0000
16 15 0005
16 15 0015
16 15 0023
09 45 0000
09 45 0010
09 45 0022
10 55 0000
10 55 0005
10 SS 0020
10 55 0036
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
14 50 0000
14 50 0005
14 50 0015
14 50 0022
16 15 0000
16 15 0005
16 15 0015
16 15 0023
09 45 0000
09 <»5 0012
09 <»5 0020
10 55 0000
10 55 0003
10 55 0005
10 55 0020
10 55 0036
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
18.9
18.9
18.4
15.5
26.6
26.5
26.0
25.3
28.9
28.9
27.9
21.1
21.1
20.5
19.8
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
i 0.016
0.017
0.016
0.029
0.029
0.027
0.023
0.022
0.058
0.050
0.081
0.278
00300
DO
MG/L
8.2
8.8
7.4
8.2
1.8
2.0
7.6
7.6
2.4
7.6
7.2
6.8
6.2
32217
CHLRPHYL
A
UG/L
3.2
24.9
12.5
12.5
00077
TRANSP
SECCHI
INCHES
120
45
85
18
00031
INCDT LT
REMNING
PERCENT
5.0
1.0
1.0
00094
CNOUCTVY
FIELD
MICROMHO
435
435
424
388
476
475
470
485
479
479
480 :
313
309
241
131
00400
PH
SU
8.40
8.40
6.30
7.95
8.50
8.45
7.95
7.95
8.50
8.50
7.70
8.01
8.03
7.85
7.95
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
158
158
158
154
140
140
145
146
118
118
99
73
2111202
0026 FEET DEPTH
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.030
0.020
0.030
0.060
0.030
0.030
0.080
0.100
0.060
0.050
0.060
0.100
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.500
0.400
0.400
0.300
0.600
0.400
0.500
0.500
0.700
0.400
0.400
0.800
00630
N02&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.180
0.180
0.180
0.220
0.050
0.050
0.090
0,130
0.080
0.060
0.230
0.180
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.009
0.006
0.007
0.005
0.006
0.014
0.009
0.023
0.030
-------
APPENDIX E
TRIBUTARY AND WASTEWATER
TREATMENT PLANT DATA
-------
bTORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/03/10
DATE TIME DEPTH
FPOM OF
TO DAY FEET
74/09/07
74/10/12
74/11/15
75/01/16
75/02/24
75/03/11
75/04/06
75/04/24
7b/05/18
75/06/22
75/07/23
75/08/27
17
11
09
10
11
10
10
12
09
12
10
10
13
10
30
40
45
?.S
00
00
40
30
40
35
4803A1
31 06 15.0 097 2a lb.0 <*
LEON rtlVtr
<«8 7,5 dtLTON
o/tiF.LTON RESERVOH
SO FT H OF 2NUAKY ^0 2.0
llEPALtS
NM RT 317
2111204
0000 FEET Dct-Tn CLASS 00
0630
'iN03
OTAL
IG/L
0.032
0.112
0.192
0.240
0.24a
0.25C
0.290
0.330
0.370
0.360
0.040
0.040
00625
TOT KJEL
N
M6/L
0.700
0.800
o.eoo
0.700
0.550
0.700
1.180
0.350
0.200
0.350
0.750
1.250
00610
i^ri3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.035
0.200
0.040
0.056
0.032
0.035
0.040
0.025
0.020
0.050
0.390
0.430
00671
PriOS-IJlS
OPTHO
MG/L P
0.005K
0.015
0.010
0.008
0.008K
0.010
0.010
0.005K
0.005K
0.005K
0.030
0.037
00665
PhOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.030
0.030
0.020
0.020
0.040
0.060
0.010
0.010
0.020
0.050
0.070
K VALUE KNOWN TO 8E
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
HEi'RIEVAL OATc 76/03/10
DATE TIME DEPTH N02t>N03
Fr^OM OF
TO DAY FEET
74/09/07
74/10/10
74/12/07
75/01/16
75/02/24
75/02/27
75/04/07
75/04/24
75/05/06
75/05/18
75/07/15
75/08/27
11 40
11 30
09 30
12 50
12 30
13 30
11 30
13 00
13 30
09 50
14 20
13 30
4803A2
31 ?3 50.0 097 31 aO.O 4
LEON ^IVE
4tf 7.5 LEON JOT
T/^ELTON RESERVOIR
Of; Hn1 931 4 Ml NE OF LtuN JCT
2111204
0000 F££T OEPTrt CLASS 00
0630
t>N03
GTAL
IG/L
2.000
1.360
0.650
0.368
0.660
0.345
0.210
C.260
0.450
0.315
0.450
0.620
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.700
0.400
1.000
1.100
1.000
1.150
0.300
1.150
0.900
0.650
1.650
0.600
U0610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.040
0.020
0.096
0.032
0.025
0.017
0.110
0.040
0.030
0.010
0.035
0.010
00671
PMOS-OIS
OPTHQ
MG/L P
0.065
0.045
0.040
0.03?
0.080
0.025
0.020
0.040
0.040
0.030
0.030
0.012
006t>5
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.125
0.070
0.070
0.170
0.090
0.132
0.020
0.240
0.160
0.170
0.110
0.080
-------
STOftET RETRIEVAL OATE V6/03/10
31 07 37.0 097 31 itO.O 4
HuUEOUCT
43 7.5 rf
0/BLLTGN
SAMP AT If ,~/KE OF *TK FIUTxATION PLANT
11EPALLS ' 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
UATE TIME OEPTn N02«»N03
FROM OF
TO DAY FEET
74/09/07
74/10/12
74/11/16
74/12/07
75/01/16
75/C2/24
75/03/11
75/04/06
75/OW24
75/05/05
75/05/16
75/06/22
75/07/23
75/08/27
16 28
10 55
09 45
10 10
09 55
10 34
10 10
09 45
11 50
19 50
09 ?0
12 20
10 20
10 ?0
0630
VJ03
OTAL
G/L
0.104
0.112
0.200
0.208
0.248
0.272
0.260
0.315
0.375
0.360
0.300
0.230
0.060
0.075
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.400
0.500
0.300
0.900
0.900
0.400
O.W5
0.300
0.250
0.200
0.150
0.300
0.200
0.250
OJ610
NH3-N
TOTAL
Mb/L
0.015
0.050
0.035
0.048
0.040
0.024
0.022
0.035
3.025
0.015
0.015
0.020
0.045
0.045
00671
PHOS-OIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.005
G.005f<,
0.010
G.015
0.020
0.008K
0.012
0.005
0.010
0.010
0.005
0.010
0.005
0.010
00665
3HOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.010
0.010*
0.020
0.015
0.040
0.010K
0.025
0.010K
0.020
0.010
0.010K
0.040
O.G10K
0.010
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STOKET RETRIEVAL OATt 7o/03/10
4fc03Cl
31 1J 35.0 097 33 15.0 <*
OWL CrftE*
*B 7.b dLANO
T/-;ELfON rtFSErtVOIrf
50 FT S OF 2\OAr}Y *D 2.5 MI SE OF
11E'">ALE:S 21112f>4
0000 FEET OEt-Th CLASS 00
DATE
FKOM
TO
74/09/08
74/10/15
75/01/20
75/02/17
75/03/12
75/04/06
75/04/22
75/05/07
75/05/28
75/06/22
75/07/09
75/08/27
00630 00625
TIME DEPTH N02»N03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TGTAL N
DAY FEET
10
08
08
08
08
08
09
08
09
08
08
09
10
00
30
30
00
00
30
30
30
00
00
00
MG/L
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.540
.010
.840
.960
.860
.690
.560
.420
.540
.530
.52b
.370
MG/L
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
300
200
300
300
300
600
200
100
150
150
200
250
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PHOS-OI5 PHOS-TOT
TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
010
025
016
008
010
015
020
007
010
010
015
030
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
P
005K
005K
006K
003
010
005K
005K
005K
005K
010
005K
005
MG/L P
O.OOSK
C.010K
0.010K
0.010K
0.010
0.050K
0.010*
0.010*
0.010K
0.010
0.010K
0.010K
K VALUE KNOWN TO dE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
RETRIEVAL DAIE T^/C
DATE TIME DEPTH N02e,N03
FrtOM OF
TO UAY FF.ET
74/09/09
74/10/12
74/11/15
74/13/11
75/01/16
75/02/17
75/03/01
75/04/06
75/04/24
75/05/04
75/05/18
75/06/22
75/07/23
75/08/07
10 CO
10 15
10 10
10 45
10 ?5
10 00
09 45
09 10
10 ?0
19 15
oa 45
10 40
09 ?0
09 40
480301
31 12 50.0 097 4? 30.0 4
COWHOUSE OtEK
48 IB FOPT nOO'J
T/aELTON KESF^VOI*
Mlo XING H.. ( 9HDG 6.0 Ml N OF FO^T HOOO
liEPAL'-S 2111204
0000 FEET OEHT.-i CLASS 00
'0630
!c,N03
OTAL
IG/L
0.264
0.890
0.768
O.UOO
1.000
0.67?
1.200
1.400
1.300
0.390
0.630
0.450
0.090
0.040
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.700
0.300
0.800
1.300
1.100
0.900
0.550
0.700
0.500
0.300
0.500
0.450
0.400
0.900
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.010
0.040
0.045
0.328
0.192
0.104
0.085
0.085
0.045
0.030
0.020
0.040
0.035
0.015
00671
PHOS-OIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.360
0.980
0.290
0.408
0.650
0.432
0.908
1.200
1.350
0.790
0.375
Oe840
0.525
0.910
0066S
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
C.39Q
0.9dO
0.330
0.480
0.720
0.500
0.920
1.200
1.450
0.815
0.400
C.890
0.580
0.980
-------
RETRIEVAL DATE 7b/v3/io
48G3AA Pu4to03XA
31 08 00..0 097 52 30.0 4
COPPt^fls COVE ME
43021 7.5COHPEHA3 COvt
P010000
DATfc.
FhiOM OF
TO DAY
TIME DEPTH
FEE
7A/09/?*
7<»/lO/17
7^/11/20
7^/12/20
75/01/21
75/02/20
75/03/20
75/0^/17
75/05/20
75/06/19
75/07/23
75/08/20
06
10
10
10
13
10
10
10
10
1C
10
10
00
15
00
00
00
15
15
15
15
15
00
00
TURKEY t-ur,
ItCJ'.IUL -il.lTn
i ic.ALC -3
0000 >-£ET DC
00630
NG2&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.320
0.^40
O.OHO
0.080
0.080
o.oao
0.080
0.050
0.05U
0.050
0.025
0.02b
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
17,'jQO
23.000
14.000
20.000
28.000
17.000
5.000
25.000
20.000
17.000
17.000
29.000
00610
NH;<-N
TOTAL
MG/L
2.200
6.000
?.2CO
6.200
0.400K
3.640
4.200
7.600
4.700
0.050
1.200
3.600
C1671
PrtOS-GiS
OPT HO
MG/L P
5. loC
2.503
6.200
6.900
'j.600
5.800
6.700
6.300
4.000
7.900
6.000
00665
P.iOS-TOT
MG/L P
7.DOO
ll.bOO
7.600
9.<*00
10.000
o.bOO
7.700
11.000
9.600
8.200
9.300
13.500
S0051
FLO'*
-JATE
INST MGO
0.672
0.847
0.756
0.847
0.430
0.737
0.847
0.8<*7
0.847
0.847
O.S47
0.937
C. 1 ** i C. 'J
^TH CLAbS JO
50053
COtJOUIT
FLOw-MGO
MONTHLY
0.601
0.89/
0.014
0.825
0.346
0.855
0.855
0.667
0.845
0.902
0.6*2
O.fa64
K VALUE KNOWN TO 6£
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STOKET HElKlEVAL OATE 76/03/10
DATE TIME DEPTH N02c.N03
FROM OF
TO OAY FEET
74/09/26
74/10/17
74/11/20
74/12/20
75/01/21
75/02/20
75/03/20
75/04/17
75/05/20
75/06/19
75/07/23
75/08/20
08
10
10
10
13
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
15
no
15
15
15
00
00
00
00
00
15
IS
4803rA PG4803YA
31 0* 00. n 097 55 Ou.O 4
COPPEH4S COvE .\jW
4d 7.5COPPE3AS COvE
T/CSC5S
nOUSE
P007500
0000 FEET QEHTn CLASS 00
0630
'C.N03
OTAL
IG/L
C.I 20
0.040
O.ObO
O.OriO
0.080
0.060
0.080
O.ObO
0.050
0.050
0.050
0.025
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
18.500
30.000
19.000
26.000
24.000
22.000
13.000
24.000
23.000
20.000
14.500
29.000
00610
Nrt3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
^.500
9.600
5.100
11.500
5.900
7.950
1 1.000
9.300
7.900
4.600
• 7.6CO
1C. 000
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
5.150
1.650
6.100
7.600
5.500
9.600
5.750
4.500
5.500
6.250
3.600
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L . P
3.200
13.000
8.800
10.500
9.200
b.400
9.900
10.500
9.900
9.000
9.000
11.500
50051
FLOW
(?ATE
INST MOD
0.294
0.430
0.430
0.245
0.756
0.294
0.430
0.430
0.430
0.782
0.667
0.559
50053
CONDUIT
FLOw-MGO
MONTHLY
0.375
0.353
0.307
0.457
0.849
0.350
0.470
0.423
0.533
0.688
0.643
0.578
-------
STORE.T KETHIEVAL UATE 7o/OJ/iO
DATE TIMF DEPTH N02S.N03
FKOM OF
TO DAY FEET
75/03/13
75/03/18
75/04/10
75/05/02
75/06/16
75/09/02
75/09/09
75/10/01
11
11
14
14
09
09
09
09
10
10
00
30
15
30
30
31
40
*1
00
01
4803ZA PD4603ZA
31 lb 00.0 097 22 00.0 <»
CITY iMHOf-r PLANT
^d 7.5 MOOD*
P001286
0000 FEET
CLASS 00
0630
t«N03
OTAL
iG/L
0.080
0.080
1.4^0
0.150
0.200
0.175
0.190
0.050
0.050
0.42b
0.400
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/U
25.500
16.000
21. COO
33.000
41.000
34.500
^2.000
34.500
35.000
24.000
27.000
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
4.500
1.200
0.320
1.350
0.250
0.450
1.650
0.780
1.350
1.000
00671
PHOS-OIS
ORTHO
MG/L p
4.SOO
5.300
4.200
2.900
B.700
5.&00
12.000
11.500
9.600
9.600
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
d. 300
6.^00
7. 800
9.SOO
7.500
12.800
2S. 000
16.000
la.SOO
12.UOU
12.000
50051
FLOW
KATE
INST MOD
0.07'^
0.075
0.062
0.026
0.436
0.2bO
U.200
0.165
U.165
50053
CONDUIT
FLOW-MOD
MONTHLY
0.0*9
0.070
0.060
0.022
0.374
0.086
0.072
0.165
0.165
------- |