U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
WORKING PAPER SERIES
REPORT
ON
CANYON RESERVOIR
COWL COUNTY
TEXAS
EPA REGION VI
WORKING PAPER No, 639
CORVALLIS ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY - CORVALLIS, OREGON
and
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING & SUPPORT LABORATORY - LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
•&G.P.O. 699-440
-------
REPORT
ON
CANYON RESERVOIR
COM. COUNTY
TEXAS
EPA REGION VI
WORKING PAPER No, 639
WITH THE COOPERATION OF THE
TEXAS WATER QUALITY BOARD
AND THE
TEXAS NATIONAL GUARD
FIARCH, 1977
-------
CONTENTS
Page
Foreward ii
List of Texas Study Reservoirs iv
Lake and Drainage Area Map vi
Sections
I. Conclusions 1
II. Lake and Drainage Basin Characteristics 4
III. Lake Water Quality Summary 5
IV. Nutrient Loadings 11
V. Literature Reviewed 15
VI. Appendices 16
-------
11
FOREWORD
The National Eutrophication Survey was initiated in 1972 in
response to an Administration commitment to investigate the nation-
wide threat of accelerated eutrophication to freshwater lakes and
reservoirs.
OBJECTIVES
The Survey was designed to develop, in conjunction with state
environmental agencies, information on nutrient sources, concentrations,
and impact on selected freshwater lakes as a basis for formulating
comprehensive and coordinated national, regional, and state management
practices relating to point-source discharge reduction and non-point
source pollution abatement in lake watersheds.
ANALYTIC APPROACH
The mathematical and statistical procedures selected for the
Survey's eutrophication analysis are based on related concepts that:
a. A generalized representation or model relating
sources, concentrations, and impacts can be constructed.
b. By applying measurements of relevant parameters
associated with lake degradation, the generalized model
can be transformed into an operational representation of
a lake, its drainage basin, and related nutrients.
c. With such a transformation, an assessment of the
potential for eutrophication control can be made.
LAKE ANALYSIS
In this report, the first stage of evaluation of lake and water-
shed data collected from the study lake and its drainage basin is
documented. The report is formatted to provide state environmental
agencies with specific information for basin planning [§303(e)j, water
quality criteria/standards review [§303(c)], clean lakes [§314(a,b)],
and water quality monitoring [§106 and §305(b)j activities mandated
by the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972.
-------
Beyond the single lake analysis, broader based correlations
between nutrient concentrations (and loading) and trophic condi-
tion are being made to advance the rationale and data base for
refinement of nutrient water quality criteria for the Nation's
fresh water lakes. Likewise, multivariate evaluations for the
relationships between land use, nutrient export, and trophic
condition, by lake class or use, are being developed to assist
in the formulation of planning guidelines and policies by EPA
and to augment plans implementation by the states.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The staff of the National Eutrophication Survey (Office of
Research & Development, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency)
expresses sincere appreciation to the Texas Water Quality Board
for professional involvement, to the Texas National Guard for
conducting the tributary sampling phase of the Survey, and to
those Texas wastewater treatment plant operators who voluntarily
provided effluent samples.
Hugh C. Yantis, Jr., Executive Director of the Texas Water
Quality Board, and John B. Latchford, Jr., Director, and the staff
of the Field Operations Division provided invaluable lake documen-
tation and counsel during the Survey, reviewed the preliminary
reports, and provided critiques most useful in the preparation of
this Working Paper series.
Major General Thomas Bishop, the Adjutant General of Texas,
and Project Officer Colonel William L. Seals, who directed the
volunteer efforts of the Texas National Guardsmen, are also grate-
fully acknowledged for their assistance to the Survey.
-------
1v
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
STUDY RESERVOIRS
State of Texas
NAME
Amistad
Bastrop
Bel ton
Braunig
Brownwood
Buchanan
Caddo
*
Calaveras
Canyon
Colorado City
Corpus Christi
Diversion
Eagle Mountain
Fort Phantom Hill
Houston
Kemp
Lake O'The Pines
Lavon
Lewisville (Garza-Little Elm)
Livingston
COUNTY
Val Verde
Bastrop
Bell, Coryell
Bexar
Brown
Burnet, Llano
Harrison, Marion, TX;
Caddo Parish, LA
Bexar
Comal
Mitchell
Jim Wells, Live Oak, San
Patricio
Archer, Baylor
Tarrant, Wise
Jones
Harris
Baylor
Camp, Marion, Morris,
Upshur
Coll in
Denton
Polk, San Jacinto, Trinity,
Walker
-------
Lyndon B. Johnson
Medi na
Meredith
0. C. Fisher (San Angelo)
Palestine
Possum Kingdom
Sam Rayburn
Somerville
E. V. Spence
Stamford
Still house Hollow
Tawakoni
Texoma
Travis
Trinidad
Twin Buttes
White River
Whitney
Wright Patman (Texarkana)
Burnet, Llano
Bandera, Medina
Hutchinson, Moore,
Potter
Tom Green
Anderson, Cherokee,
Henderson, Smith
Palo Pinto, Stephens,
Young
Angelina, Jasper
Nacogdoches, Sabine, San
Augustine
Burleson, Lee, Washington
Coke
Haskell
Bell
Hunt, Rains, Van Zandt
Cooke, Grayson TX; Bryan,
Johnston, Love, Marshall, OK
Burnet, Travis
Henderson
Tom Green
Crosby
Bosque, Hill
Bowie, Cass
-------
VTexa
Map Location
CANYON RESERVOIR
& Tributary Sampling Site
X Lake Sanplinq Site
~~^ Drainage Area Boundary
0 to 20 "*•<"
|_ | I
0 5 TO !
-------
CANYON RESERVOIR
STORE! NO. 4809
I. CONCLUSIONS
A. Trophic Condition:
Survey data indicate that Canyon Reservoir is mesotrophic;
i.e., moderately supplied with nutrients and productive. Whether
nutrient enrichment is beneficial or deleterious depends on the
actual or potential effect on the uses of the reservoir. In this
regard, no nuisance conditions are known to personnel of the texas
Water Quality Board and there is little or no impairment of the
designated beneficial uses of this water body.
Canyon Reservoir ranked first in overall trophic quality when
39 Texas reservoirs sampled in 1974 were compared using a combi-
nation of six parameters*. None of the other reservoirs had less
but one had the same median total phosphorus, one had less median
dissolved phosphorus, 35 had less median inorganic nitrogen, one
had less mean chlorophyll a_, and two had greater mean Secchi disc
transparency.
Depression of hypolimnetic dissolved oxygen occurred at all
stations in May and August, and depression with depth occurred at
stations 1 and 2 in November.
B. Rate-Limiting Nutrient:
The algal assay results indicate that the primary productivity
in Canyon Reservoir was phosphorus limited at the times the samples
* See Appendix A.
-------
were collected (03/13/74 and 11/05/74). The reservoir data indi-
cate phosphorus limitation at all sampling times.
C. Nutrient Controllability:
1. Point sources—During the sampling year, septic tanks
serving shoreline dwellings were estimated to have contributed
0.4% of the total phosphorus load to Canyon Reservoir, but a
shoreline survey would be needed to determine the significance
of these sources. In addition, the Randolph Air Force Base
Marina wastewater treatment facility discharges directly to the
reservoir; however, no effluent quality data are available (Wyatt,
1976), and the phosphorus contribution of this source is not known.
The phosphorus loading of 0.15 g/m2 measured during the sampling
year is less than that proposed by Vollenweider (Vollenweider and
Dillon, 1974) as an oligotrophic loading (see page 14); however,
the actual loading was higher to some degree because of the
Randolph AFB Marina contribution. The existing reservoir water
quality should persist if phosphorus inputs are kept at or below
the proposed oligotrophic loading.
2. Non-point sources—The phosphorus contributions of non-
point sources accounted for 99.6% of the total phosphorus load
during the sampling year. The Guadalupe River contributed 77.3%,
and Rebecca Creek contributed 1.0% of the total. Ungaged drainage
areas were estimated to have contributed 9.9% of the total load to
Canyon Reservoir.
-------
The phosphorus export rates of the Guadalupe River and Rebecca
Creek were very low (see page 13) and compare very well with the
export rates of unimpacted streams elsewhere in Texas.
-------
II. RESERVOIR AND DRAINAGE BASIN CHARACTERISTICS1"
A. Morphometry :
1. Surface area: 33.35 kilometers2.
2. Mean depth: 14.0 meters.
3. Maximum depth: >39.0 meters.
4. Volume: 471.198 x 106 m3.
5. Mean hydraulic retention time: 1 year (based on 1972-1976
mean outflow).
B. Tributary and Outlet:
(See Appendix C for flow data)
1. Tributaries -
Drainage Mean flow
Name area (km2)* (m3/sec)*
Guadalupe River 3,405.8 7.560
Rebecca Creek 28.2 0.146
Minor tributaries &
immediate drainage - 251.8 1.050
Totals 3,685.8 8.756
2. Outlet -
Guadalupe River 3,719.2** 7.910
C. Precipitation***:
1. Year of sampling: 85.6 centimeters.
2. Mean annual: 80.0 centimeters.
t Table of metric conversions—Appendix B.
tt At conservation pool level; Barrows, 1977.
* For limits of accuracy, see Working Paper No. 175, "...Survey Methods,
1973-1976".
** Includes area of reservoir.
*** See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
III. WATER QUALITY SUMMARY
Canyon Reservoir was sampled four times during 1974 by means of a
pontoon-equippped Huey helicopter. Each time, samples for physical and
chemical parameters were collected from four stations on the reservoir
and from a number of depths at each station (see map, page vi). During
each visit, a single depth-integrated (4.6 m to surface) sample was
composited from the stations for phytoplankton identification and enum-
eration; and during the March and November visits, single 18.9-liter
depth-integrated samples were composited for algal assays. Also each
time, a depth-integrated sample was collected from each of the stations
for chlorophyll a^ analysis. The maximum depths sampled were 39.0 meters
at station 1, 30.2 meters at station 2, 22.6 meters at station 3, and
15.5 meters at station 4.
The sampling results are presented in full in Appendix D and are
summarized in the following table (the August nutrient samples were not
preserved properly and were not analyzed).
-------
PARAMETER
TEMP (C)
DISS OXY (MG/L)
CNDCTVY (MCROMO)
PH (STAND UNITS)
TOT ALK (MG/D
TOT P (MG/L)
ORTHO P (MG/L)
N02*N03 (MG/D
AMMONIA (MG/L)
KJEL N (MG/L)
INORG N (MG/L)
TOTAL N (MG/L)
CHLR^YL A (UG/D
SECCHI (METERS)
A. SUMMARY OF PHYSICAL AND
1ST SAMPLING ( 3/13/74)
4 SITES
RANGE
12.0 - 20.0
5.0 - 9.6
320. - 430.
7.8 - 8.3
178. - 232.
0.005 - 0.014
0.004 - 0.011
0.390 - 0.890
0.020 - 0.150
0.200 - 0.500
0.410 - 1.020
0.590 - 1.220
0.8 - 1.2
1.5 - 4.3
CHEMICAL CHARACTEKlSTICS FOK CANYON RESERVOIR
STOWET CODE <+809
2ND SAMPLING.( 5/22/74)
4 SITES
3RD SAMPLING ( 8/15/74)
4 SITES
MEAN
16.0
8.0
367.
8.2
198.
0.008
0.007
0.538
0.042
0.250
0.581
0.788
1.0
2.8
MEDIAN
16.0
8.1
360.
8.2
192.
0.007
0.005
0.440
0.035
0.200
0.465
0.72.5
1.0
2.7
KANGE
13.4
1.0
342.
7.1
155.
0.006
0.002
0.400
0.020
0.200
0.430
0.600
3.5
1.4
- 28.2
8.0
- 512.
8.3
- 203.
- 0.053
- 0.011
- 0.970
- 0.060
- 0.800
- 1.030
- 1.280
7.9
2.6
MEAN
22.9
4.8
399.
7.7
176.
0.013
0.004
0.520
0.037
0.257
0.557
0.777
5.7
2.1
MEDIAN
25.1
5.4
395.
7.7
174.
0.009
0.003
0.470
0.040
0.200
0.500
0.720
5.7
2.2
KANGE MEAN MEDIAN
15.6 - 28.2 24.6 27.0
0.2 - 7.6 4.6 6.4
355. - 497. 399. 391.
7.2 - 8.5 8.0 8.0
«««»»<> - o tutinnxxnnnto «»»o « o « e o o
»»»»»« - « (too o « (nnKHKHn»oo iotnto
1.0 - 3.0 1.9 1.6
2.3 - 5.5 3.8 3.7
-------
A. SUMMARY OF PHYSICAL
CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS FOK CANYON RESERVOIR
ST03ET CODE 4809
PARAMETER
TEMP 1C)
DISS OXY (MG/L)
CNDCTVY (MCROMO)
PH (STAND UNITS)
TOT ALK (MG/L)
TOT P (MG/L)
ORTHO P (MG/L)
N02+N03 (MG/L)
AMMONIA (MG/L)
KJEL N (MG/L)
INORG N (MG/L)
TOTAL N (MG/L)
CHLRPYL A (UG/D
SECCHI (METERS)
4TH SAMPLING
5/74)
4 SITES
RANGE MEAN
20.4
0.6
282.
7.2
144.
0.006
0.005
0.130
0.020
0.200
0.250
0.430
0.9
1.2
r 21.4
8.0
- 422.
8.0
- 201.
- 0.045
- 0.015
- 0.480
- 0.460
- 0.400
- 0.750
- 0.7BO
2.2
4.6
21.1
6.5
346.
7.8
167.
0.020
0.009
0.273
0.053
0.264
0.32ft
0,537
1.4
3.0
MEDIAN
21.2
7.0
343.
7.9
165.
0.020
0.009
0.250
0.030
0.200
0.280
0.530
1.2
3.2
-------
8
B. Biological characteristics:
1. Phytoplankton -
Sampli ng
Date
03/13/74
05/22/74
08/15/74
11/05/74
Dominant
Genera
1. Chroomonas sp.
2. Synedra sp.
3. Mallomonas sp.
4. Nitzschia sp.
Other genera
Total
1. Chroomonas sp.
2. Coelastrum sp.
3. Cryptomonas sp.
4. Cyclotella sp_.
5. Dinobryon sp.
Other genera
Total
1. Cryptomonas sp.
2. Microcystis sp.
3. Chroomonas sp.
4. Tetraedron sp.
5. Navicula sp.
Other genera
Total
1. Chroomonas sp.
2. Cryptomonas sp.
3. Dinobryon sp.
4. Synedra sp.
5. Chlamydomonas sp.
Other genera
Algal Units
per ml
217
29
14
14
1
275
494
198
99
99
49
148
1,087
345
276
242
104
69
310
1,346
686
172
103
103
69
102
Total
1,235
-------
2. Chlorophyll
Sampling
Date
03/13/74
05/22/74
08/15/74
11/05/74
Station
Number
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
C. Limiting Nutrient Study:
1. Autoclaved, filtered, and nutrient spiked -
a. March sample -
Spike (mg/1)
Control
0.050 P
0.050 P + 1.0 N
1.0 N
Ortho P
Cone. (mg/TJ
<0.005
<0.055
<0.055
<0.005
b. November sample -
Spike (mg/1)
Control
0.050 P
0.050 P + 1.0 N
1.0 N
Ortho P
Cone, (mg/1)
0.004
0.054
0.054
0.004
Inorganic N
Cone, (mg/1)
0.610
0.610
1.610
1.610
Inorganic N
Cone, (mg/1)
0.267
0.267
1.267
1.267
Chlorophyll a
(ug/D
1.1
0.8
0.9
1.2
4.4
3.5
7.9
7.0
2.7
3.0
2.2
0.9
1.1
1.3
Maximum yield
(mg/1-dry wt.)
0.1
7.0
6.4
0.1
Maximum yield
(mg/1-dry wt.)
0.1
6.6
16.4
0.1
-------
10
2. Discussion -
The control yields of the assay alga, Selenastrum capri-
cornutum, indicate that the potential primary productivity
of Canyon Reservoir was low in March and November, 1974.
Also, the significant increase in yields with the addition
of orthophosphorus and the lack of change in yields when
only nitrogen was added indicate phosphorus limitation.
The reservoir data also indicate phosphorus limitation;
i.e., the mean inorganic nitrogen/orthophosphorus ratios
were 36/1 or greater at all sampling times, and phosphorus
limitation would be expected.
-------
11
IV. NUTRIENT LOADINGS
(See Appendix E for data)
For the determination of nutrient loadings, the Texas National
Guard collected monthly near-surface grab samples from each of the
tributary sites indicated on the map (page vi), except for the
months of April and May when two samples were collected. Sampling
was begun in September, 1974, and was completed in August, 1975.
Through an interagency agreement, stream flow estimates for the
year of sampling and a "normalized" or average year were provided by
the Texas District Office of the U.S. Geological Survey for the
tributary sites nearest the reservoir.
In this report, nutrient loads for sampled tributaries were
determined by using a modification of a U.S. Geological Survey computer
program for calculating stream loadings*. Nutrient loads for unsampled
"minor tributaries and immediate drainage" ("II" of U.S.G.S.) were
estimated using the nutrient loads, in kg/km2/year, at station B-l and
multiplying by the II area in km2.
No known municipal or industrial waste sources impacted Canyon Reser-
voir during the sampling year; however, the treatment facility serving
the Randolph Air Force Base Marina discharged an unknown amount of phos-
phorus directly to the reservoir.
* See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
A. Waste Sources:
1. Known municipal - None
2. Known industrial - None
B. Annual Total Phosphorus Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
kg P/ % of
Source yr total
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
Guadalupe River 3,960 77.3
Rebecca Creek 50 1.0
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non-point load) - 505 9.9
c. Known municipal STP's - None
d. Septic tanks* - 20 0.4
e. Known industrial - None
f. Direct precipitation** - 585 11.4
Total 5,120 100.0
2. Outputs -
Lake outlet - Guadalupe River 3,105
3. Net annual P accumulation - 2,015 kg.
* Estimate based on 65 lakeshore dwellings and two parks; see Working Paper
No. 175.
** See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
13
C. Annual Total Nitrogen Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
kg N/ % of
Source yr total
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
Guadalupe River 433,250 88.3
Rebecca Creek 2,090 0.4
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non-point load) - 18,635 3.8
c. Known municipal STP's - None
d. Septic tanks* - 835 0.2
e. Known industrial - None
f. Direct precipitation** - 36,005 7.3
Total 490,815 100.0
2. Outputs -
Lake outlet - Guadalupe River 174,140
3. Net annual N accumulation - 316,675 kg.
D. Non-point Nutrient Export by Subdrainage Area:
Tributary kg P/km2/yr kg N/km2/yr
Guadalupe River 1 127
Rebecca Creek 2 74
* Estimate based on 65 lakeshore dwellings and two parks; see Working Paper
No. 175.
** See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
14
E. Yearly Loads:
In the following table, the existing phosphorus loadings
are compared to those proposed by Vollenweider (Vollenweider
and Dillon, 1974). Essentially, his "dangerous" loading is
one at which the receiving water would become eutrophic or
remain eutrophic; his "permissible" loading is that which
would result in the receiving water remaining oligotrophic
or becoming oligotrophic if morphometry permitted. A meso-
i
trophic loading would be considered one between "dangerous"
and "permissible".
Note that Vollenweider's model may not be applicable to
water bodies with short hydraulic retention times.
Total Phosphorus Total Nitrogen
Total Accumulated Total Accumulated
grams/m2/yr 0.15 0.06 14.7 9.5
Vollenweider phosphorus loadings
(g/m2/yr) based on mean depth and mean
hydraulic retention time of Canyon Reservoir:
"Dangerous" (eutrophic loading) 0.72
"Permissible" (oligotrophic loading) 0.36
-------
15
V. LITERATURE REVIEWED
Barrows, David, 1977. Personal communication (reservoir morphometry
and hydraulic retention time). Canyon Proj. Off., Fort Worth
Dist., Corps of Engrs., New Braunfels, TX.
Vollenweider, R. A., and P. J. Dillon, 1974. The application of the
phosphorus loading concept to eutrophication research. Nat!. Res.
Council of Canada Publ. No. 13690, Canada Centre for Inland Waters,
Burlington, Ontario.
Wyatt, Linda B., 1976. Personal communication (review of preliminary
report) TX Water Qual. Bd., Austin.
-------
16
VI. APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
LAKE RANKINGS
-------
LAKE DATA TO BE USED IN RANKINGS
LAKE
CODE LAKE NAME
4601 AMISTAO LAKE
4802 BASTROP LAKE
4803 BELTON RESERVOIR
4804 BKAUNIG LAKE
4805 BROWNWOOD LAKE
4806 LAKE BUCHANAN
4807 CADOO LAKE
4808 CALAVERAS LAKE
4809 CANYON RESERVOIR
4810 LAKE COLORADO CITY
4811 CORPUS CRISTI LAKE
4812 DIVERSION LAKE
4813 EAGLE MOUNTAIN LAKE
4814 FT PHANTOM HILL LAKE
4815 GARZA LITTLE ELM RESERVO
4816 KEMP LAKE
4817 HOUSTON LAKE
4818 LAKE OF THE PINES
4819 LAVON RESERVOIR
4820 LIVINGSTON LAKE
4821 LYNDON 8 JOHNSON LAKE
4822 MEDINA LAKE
4823 LAKE MEREDITH
4824 PALESTINE LAKE
4825 POSSUM KINGDOM RESERVOIR
4826 SAN ANGELO RESERVOIR
4827 SAM RAYBURN RESERVOIR
4828 E V SPENCE RESERVOIR
MEDIAN
TOTAL P
0.013
0.02?
0.016
0.134
0.027
0.036
0.055
0.038
0.010
0.042
0.113
0.025
0.024
0.060
0.045
0.023
0.097
0.031
0.063
0.196
0.042
0.010
0.021
0.031
0.023
0.098
0.029
0.036
MEDIAN
INOWG N
0.500
0.090
0.185
0.150
0.100
0.250
0.070
0.060
0.450
0.090
0.130
0.080
0.070
0.105
0.380
0.110
0.260
0.090
0.180
0.555
0.420
0.600
0.070
0.180
0.070
0.140
0.150
0.080
500-
MEAN SEC
371.474
419.917
378.312
461.625
470.375
437.625
463.333
461.667
384.812
473.625
475.187
470.111
469.625
474.909
475.782
455.000
486.187
440.000
485.333
465.469
456.500
403.562
439.312
442.625
419.045
481.000
439.458
462.583
MEAN
CHLOftA
2.C .2
12.392
8.025
22.762
4.887
8.606
14.808
22.500
2.500
12.675
19.756
15.867
5.662
6.317
14.156
10.217
16.650
12.919
5.400
16.112
8.100
12.944
3.037
10.619
9.495
24.675
6.267
11.775
15-
MIN DO
14.900
15.000
IS. 000
14.800
14.400
15.000
11.400
13.000
14.800
10.200
14.000
9.000
11.000
9.800
14.600
10.400
12.400
15.000
8.800
15.000
14.900
15.000
14.900
14.800
15.000
10.200
15.000
1.5.000
MEDIAN
DISS OUTHO P
0.009
0.007
0.007
0.062
0.007
0.012
0.013
0.007
0.006
0.012
0.050
0.009
0.008
0.022
0.018
0.007
0.036
0.011
0.018
0.128
0.013
0.004
0.009
0.010
0.009
0.011
0.009
0.008
-------
LAKE DATA TO BE USED IN RANKINGS
LAKE
CODE LAKE NAME
4829 SOMERVILLE LAKE
<»830 STAMFORD LAKE
4631 STILLHOUSE HOLLOW RESEKV
4832 TAWAKONI LAKE
4833 TEXARKANA LAKE
4834 TEXOMA LAKE
4835 TRAVIS LAKE
4836 TRINIDAD
4837 TWIN BUTTES RESERVOIR
4838 WHITE RIVER RESERVOIR
4839 WHITNEY LAKE
MEDIAN
TOTAL P
0.053
0.073
O.Old
0.04b
0.106
0.042
0.018
0.389
0.029
0.020
0.028
MEDIAN
INORG N
0.115
O.C60
0.160
0.100
0.120
0.160
0.250
0.110
0.250
0.110
0.120
500-
MEAN SEC
473.833
482.714
406.250
46b.4l7
476.500
451.321
389.913
479.500
454.917
434.500
430.500
MEAN
CHLORA
24. 4 -Jl
18.457
3.917
18.246
19.119
12.493
5.595
24.300
8.708
4.333
6.912
Ib-
MIN 00
13.000
10.600
15.000
13.200
12.400
15.000
15.000
10.000
14.800
15.000
15.000
MEOUN
OISS OrtTnO fi
0.01 3
0.012
0.010
0.013
0.030
0.018
0.007
0.240
0.009
0.009
0.008
-------
OF LAKES ai
LAKE
CODE LAKE NAME
UP; VALUES {NUMBER OF LAKES WITH HTGHEW VALUES*
<«801 AMISTAD LAKE
4802 6ASTROP LAKE
4803 8ELTON RESERVOIR
4804 BRAUNIG LAKE
4805 BROrtNWOOD LAKE
4806 LAKE BUCHANAN
4807 CADOO LAKE
4808 CALAVERAS LAKE
4809 CANYON RESERVOIR
4810 LAKE COLORADO CITY
4811 CORPUS CRISTI LAKE
4813 DIVERSION LAKE
4813 EAGLE MOUNTAIN LAKE
4814 FT PHANTOM HILL LAKE
4815 GARZA LITTLE ELM RESERVO
4816 KEMP LAKE
4817 HOUSTON LAKE
4818 LAKE OF THE PINES
4819 LAVON RESERVOIR
4830 LIVINGSTON LAKE
4821 LYNDON B JOHNSON LAKE
4832 MEDINA LAKE
4823 LAKE MEREDITH
4824 PALESTINE LAKE
4825 POSSUM KINGDOM RESERVOIR
«»826 SAN ANOELO RESERVOIR
4827 SAM RAYBURN RESERVOIR
4828 E V SPENCE RESERVOIR
MEDIAN
TOTAL P
95
79
92
5
66
47
26
45
99
39
8
68
71
24
34
76
16
54
21
3
39
99
82
54
74
13
59
50
( 36)
( 30)
< 35)
( 2)
( 25)
< 18)
( 10)
( 17)
( 37)
( 14)
( 3)
< 26)
( 27)
( 9)
( 13)
< 29)
( 6)
( 20)
( 8)
( D
( 14)
( 37)
( 3D
< 20)
( 28)
( 5)
( 22)
( 19)
MEDIAN
5
76
26
42
70
21
91
100
8
76
47
83
91
66
13
61
16
76
29
3
11
0
91
32
91
45
39
83
( 2)
( 28)
( 10)
< 16)
( 26)
( 7)
( 33)
I 38)
( 3)
( 28)
( 18)
( 3D
( 33)
( 25)
( 5)
( 22)
( 6)
( 28)
( ID
< D
( 4)
( 0)
( 33)
( 12)
( 33)
( 17)
< 15)
( 3D
500-
MEAN SEC
100 (
82 (
97 (
50 (
29 (
74 (
42 (
47 (
95 (
26 (
18 (
32 (
34 (
21 (
16 (
55 (
0 (
66 (
3 <
39 (
53 (
89 (
71 (
63 (
84 (
8 (
68 (
45 (
38)
3D
37)
19)
ID
28)
16)
18)
36)
10)
7)
12)
13)
8)
6)
21)
0)
25)
D
15)
20)
34)
27)
24)
32)
3)
26)
17)
MEAN
100
47
68
8
87
63
32
11
97
42
13
29
79
74
34
55
24
39
84
26
66
37
95
53
58
0
76
50
( 38)
( 18)
( 26)
( 3)
( 33)
( 24)
( 12)
( 4)
( 37)
( 16)
( 5)
( ID
( 30)
( 28)
( 13)
< 2D
( 9)
( 15)
( 32)
( 10)
( 25)
( 14)
( 36)
( 20)
'( 22)
( 0)
( 29)
( 19)
15-
MIN 00
39 1
17 I
17 1
49 (
58 1
17 (
76 1
67 (
49 (
88 I
61 (
97 (
79 1
95 1
55 1
84 1
72 (
17 i
100 i
17 i
39 i
17 i
39
49
17
88
17
17
; 14)
1 0)
i 0)
! 17)
; 22)
: o>
; 29)
: 25)
; 17)
: 33)
; 23)
; 37»
; 30)
i 36)
I 21)
I 32)
I 27)
1 0>
1 38)
1 0)
1 14)
( 0)
( 14)
( 17)
( 0)
( 33)
( 0)
( 0)
MEDIAN
DISS OKTHO P
63
92
84
5
84
39
30
92
97
39
8
63
76
16
21
92
11
46
21
3
30
100
63
51
63
46
63
76
< 21)
( 34)
( 3D
( 2)
( 3D
( 14)
( 10)
( 34)
( 37)
( 14)
( 3)
( 21)
( 28)
( 6)
( 7)
( 34)
( 4)
< 17)
( 7)
( D
< 10)
( 3d)
( 21)
< 19)
( 2D
( 17)
( 21)
( 28)
INDEX
NO
40
-------
PERCENT OF CAKES WITH HIGHER VALUES (NUMBER or LAKES *ITH HIGHER VALUES)
LAKE
CODE LAKE NAME
4829 SOMERVILLE LAKE
4830 STAMFORD LAKE
4831 STILLHOUSE HOLLOW
4832 TAWAKONI LAKE
4833 TEXAWKANA LAKE
4834 TEXOMA LAKE
4635 TRAVIS LAKE
4836 THINIDAD
4837 TWIN bUTTES RESERVOIR
4838 WHITE RIVER RESERVOIR
4839 WHITNEY LAKE
MEDIAN
TOTAL P
29
18
88
32
11
39
88
0
59
84
63
( 11)
( 7)
( 33)
( 12)
( 4)
( 14)
( 33)
< 0)
( 22)
( 32)
( 24)
MEDIAN
INOSG N
55
97
37
70
51
34
21
61
21
61
51
( 211
( 37)
( 14)
( 26)
( 19)
( 13)
( 7)
( 22)
( 7)
( 22)
( 19)
500-
MEAN SEC
24
5
87
37
13
61
92
11
58
76
79
( 9)
( 2)
( 33)
( 14)
< 5)
< 23)
( 35>
( 4)
( 22)
( 29)
< 30)
MEAN
CHLORA
3
18
92
21
16
45
82
5
61
89
71
1 1)
( 7)
( 35)
( 8)
( 6)
( 17)
( 3D
( 2)
( 23)
( 34)
( 27)
15-
MIN 00
67
82
17
63
72
17
17
92
49
17
17
( 25)
( 3D
( 0)
( 24)
( 27)
( 0)
( 0)
( 35)
( 17)
( 0)
( 0)
MEDIAN
DISS Uh>THO H
30
39
51
30
13
21
84
0
63
63
76
( 10)
( 14)
( 19)
( 10)
( 5)
( 7)
( 31)
( 0)
( 21)
( 21)
( 28)
INDEX
NO
208
259
372
253
176
217
384
169
311
390
357
-------
LS RANKED BY INDEX NOS.
RANK LAKE CODE LAKE NAME
INDEX NO
i 4809 CANYON RESERVOIR 445
2 4823 LAKE MEREDITH 441
3 4813 EAGLE MOUNTAIN LAKE 430
4 4816 KEMP LAKE 423
5 4801 AMISTAO LAKE 402
6 4805 BROrfNWOOD LAKE 394
7 4802 BASTROP LAKE 393
8 4838 WHITE RIVER RESERVOIR 390
9 4825 POSSUM KINGDOM RESERVOIR 387
10 4835 TRAVIS LAKE 384
11 4803 BELTON RESERVOIR 384
12 4831 STILLHOUSE HOLLOW RESERV 372
13 4812 DIVERSION LAKE 372
14 4808 CALAVERAS LAKE 362
15 4839 WHITNEY LAKE 357
16 4822 MEDINA LAKE 342
17 4827 SAM RAYBURN RESERVOIR 322
18 4828 E V SPENCE RESERVOIR 321
19 4837 TWIN 8UTTES RESERVOIR 311
20 4810 LAKE COLORADO CITY 310
21 4824 PALESTINE LAKE 302
22 4818 LAKE OF THE PINES 298
23 4807 CADDO LAKE 297
24 4814 FT PHANTOM HILL LAKE 296
25 4806 LAKE BUCHANAN 261
26 4830 STAMFORD LAKE 259
27 4819 LAVON RESERVOIR 258
28 4832 TAWAKONI LAKE 253
-------
LAKES RANKED BY INDEX NOS.
RANK LAKE CODE LAKE NAME INDEX NO
29 4821 LYNDON B JOHNSON LAKE 238
30 4834 TEXOMA LAKE 217
31 4829 SOMERVILLE LAKE 208
32 4826 SAN ANGELO HESERVOIR 200
33 4833 TEXAKKANA LAKE 176
34 4815 GARZA LITTLE ELM RESERVO 173
35 4836 TRINIDAD 169
36 4B04 BRAUNIG LAKE 159
37 4811 CORPUS CRISTI LAKE 155
38 4817 HOUSTON LAKE 139
39 4820 LIVINGSTON LAKE 91
-------
APPENDIX B
CONVERSION FACTORS
-------
CONVERSION FACTORS
Hectares x 2.471 = acres
Kilometers x 0.6214 = miles
Meters x 3.281 = feet
Cubic meters x 8.107 x 10"4 = acre/feet
Square kilometers x 0.3861 = square miles
Cubic meters/sec x 35.315 = cubic feet/sec
Centimeters x 0.3937 = inches
*
Kilograms x 2.205 = pounds
Kilograms/square kilometer x 5.711 = Ibs/square mile
-------
APPENDIX C
TRIBUTARY FLOW DATA
-------
TRIBUTARY FLO* INFORMATION ,CCR TCXAS
LAKE CODE 4809 CANrON
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA Of LAKE(SQ KM) 3719.2
03/15/76
4809A1
*»809A2
SUB-DRAlN«oE
A»EA (SO KM) JAN
3719.2
3405.8
28.2
284.9
5.97
6.60
0.198
1.2?
FEB
6.82
7.67
0.190
1.27
MAR '
7.87
7.59
0.119 0
0.91
APR
8.33
8.83
.170
1.22
MAY
9.74
12.91
0.2S3
1.95
NORMALIZED FLOWS(CMS)
JUN JUL AUG SEP
9.29
9.71
0.198
1.42
10.51
7.22
0.108
0.85
8.52 7.16
4.16 8.61
0.037 0.082
0.37 0.76
OCT
7.79
5.97
0.136
0.93
NOv*
7.48
5.78
0.099
0.74
DEC
5.38
5.80
0.136
0.93
MEAN
7.91
7.56
0. 146
1.05
SUMMARY
TOTAL
SUM OF
DRAINAGE AREA OF LAKE =
SUB-DRAINAGE AREAS =
3719.2
3719.0
TOTAL FLOW IN =
TOTAL FLOW OUT =
105.
94.
25
86
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS
TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAK MEAN FLOW DAY
4809A1
FLOW DAY
FLOW DAY
FLOW
4809A2
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
74
74
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
74
74
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
19.539
10.477
28.034
13.451
19.737
54.368
21.181
16.650
26.221
61.448
24.551
19.14?
17.840
9.203
26.618
14.300
16.339
52.952
19.397
15.291
53.519
35.396
20.445
19.142
8
8
8
9
8
7
7
3
8
9
8
8
8
8
8
9
8
• 7
7
3
8
9
8
8
22.370
10.279
47.289
18.463
23.984
19.142
20.756
16.537 21
20.445 23
48.139
90.331
19.171
13.734
8.750
29.733
13.309
17.273
65.978
22.597
13.451 21
1».5<*8 23
31.432
22.144
19.171
16.622
20.756
11.100
43.042
-------
TRIBUTARY "LOW INFORMATION Kuft TE'AAS
03/16/76
LA
-------
APPENDIX D
PHYSICAL and CHEMICAL DATA
-------
STORE7 «ETRIEVftL OATE 76/02/11
480901
29 52 05.0 098 11 58.0
CANYON RESERVOIR
H3091 TEAAS
DATE
FROM
TO
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
74/03/13 09 30 0000
09 30 0006
09 30 0020
09 30 0045
09 30 0070
09 30 0095
09 30 01*23
74/05/22 15 40 0000
15 40 0005
15 40 0022
15 40 0055
15 40 0090
15 40 0128
74/08/15 09 30 0000
09 30 0005
09 30 0015
09 30 0030
09 30 0043
09 30 0060
09 30 0080
09 30 01CO
74/11/05 09 20 0000
09 ?0 0005
09 20 0020
09 20 0040
09 20 0060
09 ?0 0080
09 20 0101
00010
»ATER
TEMP
CENT
17.1
17.0
lb.5
14.5
12.7
12.5
12.0
26.7
26.3
25.1
17.9
14.3
13.4
27.4
27.1
27.0
26.8
25.1
19.5
16.9
15.6
21.3
21.3
21.3
21.3
21.3
21.3
20.4
IIL'PALES
00300
DO
MG/L
9.0
9.6
9.2
9.0
8.8
7.0
8.0
6.2
5.4
3.2
3.2
7.2
7.6
7.6
7.6
1.4
1.4
2.0
0.6
6.8
6.6
7.4
6.8
6.4
8.0
0.6
00077 00094
THANSP CNDUCTVY
SECCHl FIELD
INCHES MICROMHO
168 35C
350
350
335
320
320
325
102 416
406
395
366
346
342
216 383
382
381
360
391
371
359
355
180 346
345
345
346
345
345
386
3
00400
PH
su
8.35
8.35
8.30
8.25
8.25
8.20
8.00
8.10
8.05
7.70
7.55
7.5C
7.50
8.40
8.30
8.3U
8.40
7.60
7.8C
7.80
7.80
7.85
7.85
7.84
7. S3
7.80
7.75
7.22
00410
r ALK
CAC03
MG/L
186
186
187
188
189
189
194
163
155
180
185
187
189
168
169
167
168
167
168
201
2111202
0127
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.020
0.020
0.020
0.030
0.020
0.020
G.020
0.050
0.030
0.020
0.020
0.030
0.030
0.020K
0.020K
0.020K
0.020K
0.020K
0.040
0.150
FEET DEPTH
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.200
0.200
0.200
0.200
0.200
0.200
0.200
0.500
0.200K
0.200K
0.200K
0.200K
0.200K
0.300
0.200
0.200
0.200K
0.200K
0.200K
0.300
00630
N02&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.400
0.390
0.390
0.390
0.390
0.390
0.450
0.430
0.420
0.470
0.450
0.440
0.440
0.250
0.240
0.250
0.240
0.240
0.240
0.130
00671
PHOS-DIS
0«THO
MG/L P
0.005
0.010
0.005
0.004
0.005
0.006
0.005
0.004
0.003
0.003
0.002K
0.002
0.002
0.009
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.005
0.005
0.005
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL 5ATE
480^01
29 52 05.0 098 11 53.0
CANYON RESERVOIR
430^1 fEAAS
DATE
FROM '
TO
74/03/13
74/05/22
74/08/15
74/11/05
OU&65 32217 00031
TIME DEPTH PHOS-TOT CrILRPHYL INCOT LT
OF A -(EMNIN<~>
DAY FEET
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
15
15
15
15
15
15
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
40
40
40
40
40
40
30
30
30
20
20
20
20
20
?0
20
20
20
0000
OOOb
0020
0045
0070
0095
0123
0000
0005
0022
0055
0090
0123
0000
0003
0043
0000
0001
0005
0020
0029
0040
0060
0030
0101
MG/L P
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.003
.007
.006
.006
.005
.006
.003
.009
.008
.007
.006
.OOci
.007
.011
.006
.003
.007
.006
.006
.009
UG/L PERCENT
1.1
4.4
2.7
50.0
1.0
2.2
50.0
1.0
21112G2
0127 FEET
-------
RETRIEVAL OATE 7b/C2/li
480902
29 52 54.0 098 13 37.0
CANYON rt£St*VOI«
48091 TEXAS
DATE
FROM OF
TO DAY
74/03/13
74/05/22
74/08/15
74/11/05
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
16
16
16
16
16
16
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
DEPTH
FEET
30 0°000
30 0006
30 0015
30 0035
30 0058
30 0075
30 0094
10 0000
10 0005
10 0020
10 0030
10 0055
10 0088
15 0000
15 0010
15 0035
15 0043
15 0055
15 0080
05 0000
05 0005
05 0020
05 0040
05 0060
05 0085
05 0099
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
18.4
18.4
17.4
15.3
12.9
12.7
12.4
27.2
26.0
25.1
23.8
18.6
14.8
27.9
27.7
27.4
25.1
19.9
17.2
21.4
21.4
21.4
21.3
21.3
20.9
20.6
11EPALES
00300
DO
MG/L
9.0
9.0
9.4
8.2
7.8
7.0
8.0
7.2
5.4
2.6
1.6
7.2
7.2
6.8
2.0
0.2
2.6
7.4
7.4
7.0
7.8
7.4
4.0
2.0
00077 00094
THANSP CNDUCTVY
SECCril FIELD
INCHES MICROMHO
106 365
365
355
340
320
320
325
95 416
401
395
389
369
350
144 385
385
383
391
373
365
180 343
342
341
340
341
405
422
3
00400
PH
SU
8.35
8.30
8.30
8.25
8.20
8.15
8.00
8.20
8.15
8.00
7.75
7.55
7.60
8.50
8.40
8.40
7.60
7.70
7.50
7.97
7.98
7.98
7.98
7.96
7.59
7.47
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
190
189
189
190
193
187
190
162
163
165
180
187
188
165
163
162
161
159
182
201
2111202
0100
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.040
0.030
0.030
0.020
0.030
0.030
0.020
0.040
0.030
0.040
0.020
0.040
0.030
0.020
0.020K
0.020K
0.020K
0.020K
0.020K
0.020K
FEET OEPTD
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.500
0.200
0.200
0.200K
0.200
0.200
0.200
0.400
0.200K
0.200K
0.200K
0.200K
0.200K
0.400
0.200
0.300
0.300
0.400
0.400
0.300
00630
N02&N03
N- TOTAL
MG/L
0.420
0.410
0.410
0.390
0.390
0.400
0.430
0.400
0.420
0.460
0.460
0.420
0.400
0.230
0.240
0.230
0.230
0.230
0.380
0.480
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.010
0.005
0.005
0.011
0.010
O.OOb
0.011
0.003
0.003
0.002
0.002K
0.002
0.002
0.013
0.014
0.012
0.011
0.014
0.012
0.013
K VALUt KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STOREf RETRIEVAL OATfe; 7t/02/ii
480902
29 62 54.0 098 13 37.0
CAVCH ^S
48Q91 TEA4S
llE^ALc.5
3
21H2U2
0100 FEET
DEPTH
DATE
TO
7^/03/13
74/05/22
74/08/15
74/11/05
00665 32217 00031
TIME DEPTH PHOS-TOT CHLPPHYL INCDT LT
OF A .-?EMNING
DAY FEET
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
16
16
16
16
16
16
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
10
10
10
10
10
10
15
15
IS
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
05
0000
OOOb
0015
0035
0058
0075
0094
0000
0005
0020
0030
0055
0088
0000
0005
0043
0000
0001
0005
0020
0023
0040
0060
0085
0099
MG/L P
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
•
•
•
•
•
*
•
•
.
•
•
•
*
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
013
006
006
006
010
006
Oil
008
006
007
006
007
053
029
023
031
023
034
023
027
UG/L PEKCENT
0.8
3.5
1.0
50.0
1.0
0.9
50.0
1.0
-------
STOSEY RETRIEVAL DATE 76/02/11
480903
29 53 31.0 098 16 49.0
CANYON RESERVOIR
48091 TEXAS
C
DATE
FROM
TO
74/03/13
74/05/23
74/08/15
74/11/05
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
11 20 0000
11 20 0006
11 20 0020
11 20 0035
11 20 0050
11 ?0 0068
09 55 0000
09 55 0005
09 55 0015
09 55 0040
09 55 0071
10 45 0000
10 45 0015
10 45 0028
10 45 0040
10 45 0055
10 45 0074
10 50 0000
10 50 0005
10 50 0015
10 50 0030
10 50 0050
10 50 0061
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
19.6
19.7
18.0
15.4
13.8
13.2
27.7
27.2
26.4
20.5
15.9
28.2
28.2
27.2
26.6
20.2
17.8
21.2
21.2
21.2
21.2
21.0
20.4
00300
DO
MG/L
S.4
8.2
8.0
7.2
7.2
7.4
6.4
4.4
2.6
7.2
7.4
7.0
2.6
0.4
0.8
7.6
7.4
7.6
7.2
7.0
5.4
11EPALES
00300
DO
MG/L
8.4
8.2
8.0
7.2
7.2
7.4
6.4
4.4
2.6
7.2
7.4
7.0
2.6
0.4
0.8
7.6
7.4
7.6
7.2
7.0
5.4
00077 00094
TRANSP CNOUCTVY
SECCHI FIELD
INCHES MICROMHO
108 400
400
395
365
365
355
75 424
420
418
369
383
144 399
398
420
422
482
417
72 343
343
343
342
332
282
3
00400
PH
SU
8.30
8.30
8.20
8.00
8.00
8.00
8.30
8.10
7.60
7.30
7.40
8.40
8.30
8.00
7.80
7.20
7.40
7.99
8.00
8.00
7.99
7.90
7.50
2111202
0072 FEET DEPTH
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
201
201
203
199
224
216
168
169
169
170
164
163
163
163
162
159
144
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.050
0.050
0.040
0.040
0.060
0.050
0.040
0.050
0.050
0.040
0.030
0.040
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.040
0.060
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.400
0.300
0.200K
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.800
0.200K
0.200K
0.200K
0.200K
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.200K
0.200K
0.200K
00630
M02&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.600
0*600
0.600
0.540
0.660
0.620
0.480
0.490
0.520
0.550
0.640
0.260
0.250
0,250
0.250
0.250
0.320
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHU
MG/L P
0.011
0.011
0.005
0.010
0.011
0.006
0.007
0.005
0.005
0.003
0.011
0.006
0.005
0.006
0.011
0.011
0.015
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORES RETRIEVAL liATE 76/02/11
480903
29 53 31.0 098 16 49.0
CANYON RESERVOIR
TEXAS
11EPALES
3
2111202
0072 FEET
DEPTH
DATE
FROM
TO
74/03/13
74/05/23
74/08/15
74/11/05
00665 32217 00031
TIME DEPTH PHOS-TOT CHLRPHYL INCDT LT
OF A REMNING
DAY FEET
11
11
11
11
11
11
09
09
09
09
09
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
20
20
20
20
20
20
55
55
55
55
55
45
45
45
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
0000
0006
0020
0035
0050
0068
0000
0005
0015
0040
0071
0000
0005
0028
0000
0001
0005
0013
0015
0030
0050
0061
MG/L P
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.009
.009
.007
.007
.007
.014
.018
.008
.020
.016
.021
.019
.015
.015
.016
.016
.045
UG/L PERCENT
0.9
7.9
1.0
50.0
1.0
1.1
50.0
1.0
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL UATE 76/02/11
480904
29 53 19.0 098 17 54.0
CANYON FTSEftVOIR
48091 TEXAS
00010
DATE TIME DEPTH WATER
FROM OF TEMP
TO DAT FEET CENT
74/03/13 12
12
12
12
12
12
74/05/23 10
10
10
10
10
10
74/08/15 11
11
11
11
11
74/11/05 11
11
11
11
11
00 0000
00 0006
00 0015
00 0028
00 0038
00 0050
15 0000
15 0005
15 0015
15 0025
15 0035
15 0051
20 0000
20 0005
20 0020
20 0030
20 0043
20 0000
20 0005
20 0015
20 0025
20 0039
20.0
20.0
19.9
16.6
15.6
14.7
28.2
27.7
26.5
25.8
21.6
19.0
28.1
28.1
27.8
27.3
25.5
20.8
20.8
20. d
20.8
20.5
8.0
8.0
7.0
6.4
5.0
7.4
6.2
4.2
1.0
1.0
6.8
7.0
6.4
5.0
1.8
6.8
7.2
7.0
6.6
6.0
00300
DO
MG/L
8.0
8.0
7.0
6.4
5.0
7.4
6.2
4.2
1.0
1.0
6.8
7.0
6.4
5.0
1.8
6.8
7.2
7.0
6.6
6.0
00077 00094
TRANSP CNOUCTVY
SECCril FIELD
INCHES MICROMHO
60 425
425
420
410
430
430
55 436
432
430
512
390
382
90 412
413
413
424
497
48 343
343
344
338
314
11EPALES
3
00400 00410
PH T ALK
SU
8.20
H.20
8.00
8.00
7.90
7.80
8.00
7.90
7.80
7.40
7.10
7.10
8.30
8.30
8.20
7.85
7.60
7.99
8.01
7.99
7.90
7.69
CAC03
MG/L
178
200
210
208
216
232
174
174
178
203
189
188
163
166
165
165
164
2111202
0054 FEET DEPTH
00610 00625 00630
NH3-N TOT KJEL N02&N03
TOTAL
MG/L
0.060
0.050
0.060
0.060
0.080
0.150
0.050
0.020
0.050
0.060
0.040
0.050
0.460
0.040
0.050
0.050
0.060
N N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.500
0.300
0.200
0.200
0.200
0.200
0.400
0.200K
0.200
0.200
0.200K
0.200K
0.400
0.200
0.200K
0.200K
0.200K
MG/L
0.720
0.700
0.770
0.780
0.890
0.870
0.580
0.530
0.580
0.970
0.710
0.700
0.290
0.280
0.280
0.360
0.430
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.005
0.004
0.005
0.005
0.004
0.006
0.005
0.003
0.008
0.004
0.006
0.005
0.009
0.013
0.011
0.009
0.009
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 7t,/02/li
480904
29 53 19.0 098 17 S4.0
CANYON P*-'SEr>VOIR
TEXAS
2111202
0054 FEET
DEPTH
DATE
FROM
TO
74/03/13
74/05/23
74/08/15
74/11/05
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
12 00 0000
12 00 0006
12 00 0015
12 00 0028
12 00 0038
12 00 0050
10 15 0000
10 15 0005
10 15 0015
10 15 0025
10 15 0035
10 IS 0051
11 20 0000
11 20 0002
11 20 0020
11 20 0000
11 ?0 0005
11 20 0015
11 20 0025
11 20 0039
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.009
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.007
0.014
0.013
0.013
0.016
0.017
0.015
0.021
0.022
0.022
0.020
0.025
0.040
32217 00031
CHLRPHYL INCDT LT
A REMNlNG
UG/L PERCENT
1.2
7.0
3.0
50.0
1.0
1.3
-------
APPENDIX E
TRIBUTARY DATA
-------
STOSiiT RETRIEVAL DATE 76/03/10
480VA1
29 51 50,0 098 09 50.0 4
GUAUALUP" RIVER
49029 7.5 SATTLtV
O/CANYON RESERVOIR
6r?D6 ON CO riWY 306 .25 M NW OF HWY 2673
IIE^ALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
DATE TIME DEPTH N02S.N03
FROM OF
TO DAY FEET
74/09/08
74/10/08
74/11/08
74/12/09
75/01/08
75/02/07
75/03/07
75/04/03
75/04/21
75/05/08
75/05/23
75/06/09
75/07/08
75/08/08
11 00
09 45
10 45
10 00
08 50
08 50
11 00
09 30
13 55
09 35
09 15
09 30
09 00
09 15
0630
'S.N03
OTAL
IG/L
0.128.
0.144
0.20S
0.288
0.416
0.36a
0.350
0.430
0.450
0.470
0.490
0.450
0.590
0.315
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.600
0.600
0.4QO
0.700
0.400
0.200
0.500
0.550
0.250
0.175
0.250
0.250
0.150
0.200
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.020
0.190
0.065
0.032
0.016
0.016
0.025
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.010
0.012
0.010
0.030
00671
PHOS-DIS
OffTHO
MG/L P
0.005K
0.005K
0.005
0.016
0.005K
0.008K
0.005K
0.005K
0.005K
0.005K
0.005K
0.005
0.005K
0.005K
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.010
0.010K
0.010K
0.016
0.010K
0.010K
0.010
0.020
0.020
0.010K
0.010K
0.010
0.010
0.010
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/03/10
DATE TIME DEPTH N02&N03
FROM OF
TO DAY FEET
74/09/08
74/10/08
74/11/08
74/12/09
75/01/08
75/02/07
75/03/07
75/04/03
75/04/21
75/05/08
75/05/23
75/06/09
75/07/OB
75/08/08
08 55
09 15
09 05
09 15
10 15
10 30
09 50
10 50
15 05
10 55
10 45
11 15
10 30
10 35
4B09A2
29 51 37.0 098 28 00.0 4
GJAjALUP^ r>IVER
48 7.5 ArthALl
T/C^iNYON RESERVOIR
BrtQG ON TO HrtY 311 2 MI b£ OF JCT US 2ril
lltPALti 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
0630
6.N03
OTAL
G/L
1.000
0.930
0.880
1.010
0.960
0.800
1.400
1.050K
1.200
0.930
0.870
1.050
1.050
0.950
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
1.000
0.400
0.700
1.200
0.600
0.300
0.400
0.350
0.400
0.650
0.350
0.200
0.250
0.350
00610
KH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.005K
0.030
0.010
0.032
0.008
0.016
0.010
0.02S
0.055
0.035
0.010
0.005K
0.005K
0.005
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTriO
MG/L P
0.005
0.010
0.005
0.008
0.005K
0.008K
0.005K
0.005K
0.005K
0.010
0.015
0.005K
0.005K
0.005K
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.020
0.010
0.020
0.010
O.Olu
0.010K
0.010
0.010K
0.020
0.020
0.040
0.010
0.025
0.010
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 76/03/iO
O 098 21 55.0 4
480961
29 55 OO
REBbECA
48 7.S FISChEK
T/cANroN RESERVOIR
b*DG ON rEC RO OFF US 281 4 M NE SPR
11EPALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
DATE
FROM
TO
74/09/08
74/10/08
74/11/08
74/12/09
75/01/08
75/02/07
75/03/07
75/04/03
75/04/21
75/05/08
75/05/23
75/06/09
75/07/08
75/08/08
00630 00625
TIME DEPTH N02^N03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TOTAL N
DAY FEET
09
09
09
09
09
10
10
10
14
10
10
10
10
10
35
45
30
35
40
05
15
20
35
25
05
50
00
10
MG/L
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.208
.128
.152
.136
.152
.240
.180
.105
.090
.140
.100
.130
.010
.090
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
.0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
900
100
400
200
400
200
700
400
300
450
250
100
100
100
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PHOS-DIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
015
020
005
016
008
008K
025
115
015
060
020
005K
010
005K
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
P
005K
005K
005K
008K
005K
008K
005K
005K
005K
005K
005K
005K
005K
005K
MG/L P
0.010
0.010K
0.010K
0.010K
0.010K
0.010*
0.010K
0.020
0.010K
0.010K
0.010K
0.010K
0.010K
0.010K
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
------- |