U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
WORKING PAPER SERIES
REPORT
ON
PALESTINE RESERVOIR
ANDERSON, CHEROKEE, HENDERSON, AND
SMITH COUNTIES
TEXAS
EPA REGION VI
WORKING PAPER No, 654
CORVALLIS ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY - CORVALLIS, OREGON
and
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING & SUPPORT LABORATORY - LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
•&G.P.O. 699-440
-------
REPORT
ON
PALESTINE RESERVOIR
ANDERSON, CHEROKEE, HENDERSON, AND
SMITH COUNTIES
TEXAS
EPA REGION VI
WORKING PAPER No, 654
WITH THE COOPERATION OF THE
TEXAS WATER QUALITY BOARD
AND THE
TEXAS NATIONAL GUARD
APRIL, 1977
-------
CONTENTS
Page
Foreward ii
List of Texas Study Reservoirs iv
Lake and Drainage Area Map vi
Sections
I. Conclusions 1
II. Lake and Drainage Basin Characteristics 4
III. Lake Water Quality Summary 5
IV. Nutrient Loadings 11
V. Literature Reviewed 16
VI. Appendices 17
-------
11
FOREWORD
The National Eutrophication Survey was initiated in 1972 in
response to an Administration commitment to investigate the nation-
wide threat of accelerated eutrophication to freshwater lakes and
reservoirs.
OBJECTIVES
The Survey was designed to develop, in conjunction with state
environmental agencies, information on nutrient sources, concentrations,
and impact on selected freshwater lakes as a basis for formulating
comprehensive and coordinated national, regional, and state management
practices relating to point-source discharge reduction and non-point
source pollution abatement in lake watersheds.
ANALYTIC APPROACH
The mathematical and statistical procedures selected for the
Survey's eutrophication analysis are based on related concepts that:
a. A generalized representation or model relating
sources, concentrations, and impacts can be constructed.
b. By applying measurements of relevant parameters
associated with lake degradation, the generalized model
can be transformed into an operational representation of
a lake, its drainage basin, and related nutrients.
c. With such a transformation, an assessment of the
potential for eutrophication control can be made.
LAKE ANALYSIS
In this report, the first stage of evaluation of lake and water-
shed data collected from the study lake and its drainage basin is
documented. The report is formatted to provide state environmental
agencies with specific information for basin planning [§303(e)], water
quality criteria/standards review [§303(c)], clean lakes [§314(a,b)j,
and water quality monitoring [§106 and §305(b)] activities mandated
by the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972.
-------
Beyond the single lake analysis, broader based correlations
between nutrient concentrations (and loading) and trophic condi-
tion are being made to advance the rationale and data base for
refinement of nutrient water quality criteria for the Nation's
fresh water lakes. Likewise, multivariate evaluations for the
relationships between land use, nutrient export, and trophic
condition, by lake class or use, are being developed to assist
in the formulation of planning guidelines and policies by EPA
and to augment plans implementation by the states.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The staff of the National Eutrophication Survey (Office of
Research & Development, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency)
expresses sincere appreciation to the Texas Water Quality Board
for professional involvement, to the Texas National Guard for
conducting the tributary sampling phase of the Survey, and to
those Texas wastewater treatment plant operators who voluntarily
provided effluent samples.
Hugh C. Yantis, Jr., Executive Director of the Texas Water
Quality Board, and John B. Latchford, Jr., Director, and the staff
of the Field Operations Division provided invaluable lake documen-
tation and counsel during the Survey, reviewed the preliminary
reports, and provided critiques most useful in the preparation of
this Working Paper series.
Major General Thomas Bishop, the Adjutant General of Texas,
and Project Officer Colonel William L. Seals, who directed the
volunteer efforts of the Texas National Guardsmen, are also grate-
fully acknowledged for their assistance to the Survey.
-------
IV
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
STUDY RESERVOIRS
State of Texas
NAME
Amistad
Bastrop
Bel ton
Braunig
Brownwood
Buchanan
Gaddo
Calaveras
Canyon
Colorado City
Corpus Christi
Diversion
Eagle Mountain
Fort Phantom Hill
Houston
Kemp
Lake O'The Pines
Lavon
Lewisville (Garza-Little Elm)
Livingston
COUNTY
Val Verde
Bastrop
Bell, Coryell
Bexar
Brown
Burnet, Llano
Harrison, Marion, TX;
Caddo Parish, LA
Bexar
Comal
Mitchell
Jim Wells, Live Oak, San
Patricio
Archer, Baylor
Tarrant, Wise
Jones
Harris
Baylor
Camp, Marion, Morris,
Upshur
Coll in
Denton
Polk, San Jacinto, Trinity,
Walker
-------
Lyndon B. Johnson
Medina
Meredith
0. C. Fisher (San Angelo)
Palestine
Possum Kingdom
Sam Rayburn
Somervi lie
E. V. Spence
Stamford
Still house Hollow
Tawakoni
Texoma
Travis
Trinidad
Twin Buttes
White River
Whitney
Wright Patman (Texarkana)
Burnet, Llano
Bandera, Medina
Hutchinson, Moore,
Potter
Tom Green
Anderson, Cherokee,
Henderson, Smith
Palo Pinto, Stephens,
Young
Angelina, Jasper
Nacogdoches, Sabine, San
Augustine
Burleson, Lee, Washington
Coke
Haskell
Bell
Hunt, Rains, Van Zandt
Cooke, Grayson TX; Bryan,
Johnston, Love, Marshall, OK
Burnet, Travis
Henderson
Tom Green
Crosby
Bosque, Hill
Bowie, Cass
-------
Map Location
Flat Creek
Reservoir,
PALESTINE RESERVOIR
Sewage Treatment Facility
Tributary Sampling Site
X Lake Sampling Site
PALESTINE
RESERVOIR
^ Land Subject to Inundation
-------
PALESTINE RESERVOIR
STORE! NO. 4824
I. CONCLUSIONS
A. Trophic Condition:
Survey data indicate that. Palestine Reservoir is eutrophic;
i.e., well supplied with nutrients and quite productive.
Whether nutrient enrichment is beneficial or deleterious de-
pends on the actual or potential effect on the uses of the
reservoir. In this regard, no nuisance conditions are known
to personnel of the Texas Water Quality Board and there is
little or no impairment of the designated beneficial uses of
this water body.
Palestine Reservoir ranked twenty-first in overall trophic
quality when the 39 Texas reservoirs sampled in 1974 were com-
pared using a combination of six parameters*. Seventeen of the
reservoirs had less and one had the same median total phosphorus,
18 had less and one had the same median dissolved phosphorus,
26 had less and one had the same median inorganic nitrogen, 18
had less mean chlorophyll a^, and 14 had greater mean Secchi disc
transparency. Marked depression of hypolimnetic dissolved
oxygen occurred at stations 1 and 2 in August.
* See Appendix A.
-------
Survey limnologists noted surface algal mats at station 4
in May. Previous investigators have noted that the upper
portions of this water body are covered with dense growths of
aquatic vegetation (Smith, 1974).
B. Rate-Limiting Nutrient:
The algal assay results indicate that Palestine Reservoir
was limited by phosphorus at the time the sample was taken
(03/19/74). The reservoir data indicate phosphorus limitation
at three of the four stations in March, at two stations in May,
and at two stations in November.
C. Nutrient Controllability:
1. Point sources—During the sampling year, point sources
contributed 65.7% of the total phosphorus input to Palestine
Reservoir. The Tyler North Plant contributed an estimated 58.6%
of this total.
The present phosphorus loading of 0.67 g/m2/year is nearly
1.8 times that proposed by Vollenweider (Vollenweider and Dillon,
1974) as a eutrophic loading (see page 15). Because most of the
reservoir is phosphorus limited, all point-source loads should be
minimized to the greatest practicable extent. A 75% phosphorus
reduction at the Tyler North Plant would reduce the present load-
ing to 0.38 g/m2/year and, if Vollenweider1s eutrophic level is
applicable to Texas reservoirs, should result in an improved
-------
trophic condition in the reservoir once a new phosphorus equi-
librium has been established.
2. Non-point sources--Non-point sources contributed an
estimated 34.3% of the total phosphorus load during the sampling
year. After point sources were subtracted, the Neches River
contributed 6.1% and Kickapoo Creek contributed 9.7%. Other
gaged tributaries included Flat and Indian creeks which con-
tributed 2.9% and 0.9% of the total, respectively. Ungaged
tributaries and immediate drainage contributed an estimated 12.1%
of the total.
-------
II. RESERVOIR AND DRAINAGE BASIN CHARACTERISTICS1"
A. Morphometry :
1. Surface area: 103.44 kilometers2.
2. Mean depth: 4.9 meters.
3. Maximum depth: 15.2 meters.
4. Volume: 508.001 x 106 m3.
5. Mean hydraulic retention time: 1.3 years (based on outflow),
B. Tributary and Outlet:
(See Appendix C for flow data)
1. Tributaries -
Drainage Mean flow
Name area (km2)* (m3/sec)*
Neches River 564.6 2.082
Flat Creek 170.9 1.150
Kickapoo Creek 600.9 3.730
Indian Creek 60.1 0.404
Minor tributaries &
immediate drainage - 701.6 5.250
Totals 2,098.1 12.616
2. Outlet -
Neches River 2,201.5** 12.080
C. Precipitation***:
1. Year of sampling: 120.8 centimeters.
2. Mean annual: 117.4 centimeters.
t Table of metric conversions—Appendix B.
tt Latchford, 1974.
* For limits of accuracy, see Working Paper No. 175, "...Survey Methods,
1973-1976".
** Includes area of reservoir.
*** See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
III. WATER QUALITY SUMMARY
Palestine Reservoir was sampled four times in 1974 by means of a
pontoon-equipped Huey helicopter. Each time, samples for physical
and chemical parameters were collected from two or more depths at
four stations on the reservoir (see map, page vi). During each
visit, a single depth-integrated (4.6 m or near bottom to surface)
sample was composited from the stations for phytoplankton identifi-
cation and enumeration; and during the March visit, a single 18.9-
liter depth-integrated sample was composited for algal assays. Also
each time, a depth-integrated sample was collected from each of the
stations for chlorophyll a_ analysis. The maximum depths sampled were
12.8 meters at station 1, 11.6 meters at station 2, 7.6 meters at
station 3, and 3.4 meters at station 4.
The sampling results are presented in full in Appendix D and are
summarized in the following table (the August nutrient samples were
not properly preserved and were not analyzed).
-------
PARAMETER
TEMP
DISS OXY (MG/L)
CNOCTVY dlCROMO)
PH (STAND UNITS)
TOT ALK (MG/U
TOT P (MG/L)
ORTHO P (MG/L)
N02*N03 (MG/L)
AMMONIA (MG/L)
KJEL N (MG/L)
INORG N (MG/L)
TOTAL N (MG/L)
CHLRPYL A (UG/L)
SECCHI (METERS)
A. SUMMARY or PHYSICAL AND
1ST SAMPLING ( 3/ 9/74)
4 SITES
CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS FO* PALESTINE LAKE
STGRET CODE 4324
RANGE
13.4 - 18.5
7.7 - 9.4
100. - 160.
6.9 - 7.5
14. - 23.
0.021 - 0.033
0.006 - 0.012
0.020 - 0.1/0
0.020 - 0.060
0.500 - 0.700
0,040 - 0.230
0.590 - 0.850
3.1 - 4.5
1.5 - 1.8
MEAN
16.1
8.7
120.
7.2
19.
0.025
0.009
0.119
0*035
0.573
0.154
0.693
3.8
1.7
MEDIAN
16.2
8.6
115.
7.2
21.
0.023
0.009
0.140
0.030
0.600
0.170
0.670
3.8
1.8
MEAN
24.1
5.0
167.
6.9
25.
MEDIAN
24.7
5.5
162.
6.9
24.
2ND SAMPLING ( 5/17/74)
4 SITES
RANGE
19.1 - 26.4
1.2 - 7.2
141. - 211.
6.5 - 7.5
23. - 31.
0.023 - 0.054 0.038 0.033
0.007 - 0.026 0.013 0.010
0.020 - 0.170 0.057 0.050
0.030 - 0.210 0.113 0.115
0.500 - 1.000 0.637 0.600
0.050 - 0.380 0.170 0.170
0.540 - 1.020 0.694 0.685
1.7 - 19.3 7.5 t.b
0.9 - 1.4 1.2 1.3
3RD SAMPLING ( 8/13/74)
4 SITES
RANGE MEAN MEDIAN
22.9 - 28.9 27.1 27.0
0.2 - 8,6 4.9 <*.6
195. - 221. 204. 204.
7.3 - 8.6 7.8 7.6
0*0000 -OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
oooooo .oooooooooooooooooooooo
oooooo -ooooooooooeooooooooooo
oooooo -oooooooooooooooooooooo
oooooo .0000000000000000000000
oooooo -oooooooooooooooooooooo
oooooo -oooooooooooooooooooooo
oooooo -oooooooooooooooooooooo
2.6 - 34.5 24*9 31.2
1.2 - 1.8 1.5 1.5
-------
A. SUMMARY OF PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS FOR PALESTINE LAKE
STORET COU£
PARAMETER
TEMP (C)
DISS OXY (MG/L)
CNOCTVY (MCROMO)
PH (STAND UNITS)
TOT ALK (MG/L)
TOT P (MG/U)
ORTHO P (MG/L)
N02»N03 (MG/L)
AMMONIA (MG/L)
KJEL N (MG/L)
INORG N (MG/L)
TOTAL N (MG/L)
CHLRPYL A
-------
B. Biological characteristics:
1. Phytoplankton -
Sampling
Date
03/09/74
05/17/74
08/13/74,
11/01/74
Dominant
Genera
1.
2.
3.
4-..
5.
1.
2.
3.
4.,
5,,
1,
2.
3.
4.
5.
1.
2.
3.
4,
5..
Melosira sp.
Chroomonas sp.
Cryptomona.s sp_.
Microcystis sp.
Ankistrodesmus sp.
Other genera-
Total
Melosira sp.
Chroomonas S£.
Dactylococcopsis sp.
Microcystis sp.
Cruc.igenia sp.
Other genera
Total
Dactyloco.ccopsi s sp.
Melosira sp.
C'ryptomonas sp.
Pennate diatoms
Raphidiopsis sp.
Other genera
Total
MeTosira s£.
Dactylococcopsis sp.
Coccoid ce.lls
Nitz.s.chia sp.
Microcystis sp.
Other genera
Alqal Units
per ml'
1,452
881
674
441
285
907
4,640
1,032
534
138
138
120
688
2,650
5,102
Total
1,647
-------
2. Chlorophyll a -
Sampling
Date
03/09/74
05/17/74
08/13/74
11/01/74
Station
Number
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
Chlorophyll a_
C. Limiting Nutrient Study:
1. Autoclaved, filtered, and nutrient spiked -
Ortho P
Cone, (mg/1)
Inorganic N
Cone, (mg/1)
3.1
3.4
4.5
4.3
1.7
4.5
4.7
19.3
2.6
34.5
31.9
30.5
3.3
5.1
4.7
11.8
Maximum yield
(mg/1-dry wt.)
Spike (mg/1)
Control
0.050 P
0.050 P + 1.0 N
1.0 N
Discussion -
The control yield of the assay alga, Selenastrum capri-
cornutum, indicates that the potential primary productivity
0.005
0.055
0.055
0.005
0.183
0.183
1.183
1.183
1.9
5.6
20.6
2.3
-------
10
of Palestine Reservoir was moderately high at the time the
sample was collected (03/19/74). Also, a significant increase
in yield with the addition of phosphorus alone indicates that
the reservoir was limited by phosphorus at that time. Note
that the addition of nitrogen alone resulted in a yield which
was not significantly greater than that of the control.
The reservoir data indicate phosphorus limitation in March
(the mean inorganic nitrogen/orthophosphorus ratio was 17/1);
narrow nitrogen limitation in May (the mean inorganic
nitrogen/orthophosphorus ratio was 13/1); and phosphorus
limitation in November (the mean inorganic nitrogen/ortho-
phosphorus ratio was 14/1).
The reservoir data indicate a spatial and temporal com-
bination of limiting nutrients. Following is a tabulation
of the mean inorganic nitrogen/orthophosphorus ratios for each
of the sampling station and times with the indicated limiting
nutrient in parentheses. Note that those stations nearest
nutrient point sources (e.g., station 4) tended toward
nitrogen limitation.
Station 03/09/74 05/17/74 11/01/74
1 22/1 (P) 13/1 (N?) 24/1 (P)
2 17/1 (P) 17/1 (P) 18/1 (P)
3 15/1 (P) 16/1 (P) 12/1 (N)
4 5/1 (N) 6/1 (N) 5/1 (N)
-------
11
IV. NUTRIENT LOADINGS
(See Appendix E for data)
For the determination of nutrient loadings, the Texas National
Guard collected monthly near-surface grab samples from each of the
tributary sites indicated on the map (page vi), except for the months
of April and May when two samples were collected. Sampling was begun
in September, 1974, and was completed in August, 1975.
Through an interagency agreement, stream flow estimates for the
year of sampling and a "normalized" or average year were provided by
the Texas District Office of the U.S. Geological Survey for the
tributary sites nearest the reservoir.
In this report, nutrient loads for sampled tributaries were
determined by using a modification of a U.S. Geological Survey computer
program for calculating stream loadings*. Nutrient loads shown are
those measured minus point-source loads, if any.
Nutrient loads for unsampled "minor tributaries and immediate
drainage" ("II" of U.S.G.S.) were estimated using the nutrient loads
at station B-l, in kg/km2/year, and multiplying by the II area in km2.
The operators of the Brownsboro, Tyler, Henderson County Municipal
Water Supply, and Van wastewater treatment plants did not participate
in the Survey; nutrient loads from these sources were estimated at
1.134 kg P and 3.401 kg N/capita/year, and flows for the Brownsboro
and Tyler North Plant were estimated at 0.3785 m3/capita/day.
See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
12
A. Waste Sources:
1. Known municipal -
Name
Brownsboro
Tyler
North plant
Kelly
Springfield
Plant*
Henderson Cty.
Mun. Water
Supply*
Van*
Pop.
Served
36,000
1,400
500
2,000
Treatment
510 stab, pond
tr. fi1ter
contact
stab.
contact
stab.
contact
stab.
Mean Flow
(m3/d)
193.0
13,626.0
113.6*
283.9*
1,135.5*
Receiving
Water
Kickapoo Creek
Black Fork Creek*
Saline Creek
Unnamed Creek/
Palestine Res.
Big Sandy Creek/
Neches R.
t Anonymous, 1971.
* Wyatt, 1976.
-------
13
B. Annual Total Phosphorus Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
kg P/ % of
Source yr total
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
Neches River 4,235 6.1
Flat Creek 2,005 2.9
Kickapoo Creek 6,735 9.7
Indian Creek 620 0.9
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non-point load) - 8,420 12.1
c. Known municipal STP's -
Brownsboro 580 0.8
Tyler
North plant 40,825 58.6
Kelly Springfield plant 1,590 2.3
Henderson Cty. Mun. Water
Supply 565 0.8
Van 2,270 3.2
d. Septic tanks - Unknown ?
e. Known industrial - None
f. Direct precipitation* - 1.810 2.6
Total 69,655 100.0
2. Outputs -
Lake outlet - Neches River 8,995
3. Net annual P accumulation - 60,660 kg.
* See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
14
C. Annual Total Nitrogen Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
kg N/ % of
Source yr total
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
Neches River 49,590 9.2
Flat Creek 27,335 5.0
Kickapoo Creek 96,430 17.8
Indian Creek 6,845 1.3
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non-point load) - 112,255 20.7
c. Known municipal STP's -
Brownsboro 1,735 0.3
Tyler
North plant 122,435 22.6
Kelly Springfield plant 4,760 0.9
Henderson Cty. Mun. Water
Supply 1,700 0.3
Van 6,800 1.3
d. Septic tanks - Unknown ?
e. Known industrial - None
f. Direct precipitation* - 111,675 20.6
Total 541,560 100.0
2. Outputs -
Lake outlet - Neches River 231,505
3. Net annual N accumulation - 310,055 kg.
D. Non-point Nutrient Export by Subdrainage Area:
Tributary kg P/km2/yr kg N/km2/yr
Neches River 8 88
Flat Creek 12 160
Kickapoo Creek 11 160
Indian Creek 10 114
* See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
15
E. Mean Nutrient Concentrations in Ungaged Streams:
Mean Total P Mean Total N
Tributary Cone, (mg/1) Cone, (mg/1)
Butler Creek 0.036 0.678
Saline Creek 0.050 0.968
F. Yearly Loads:
In the following table, the existing phosphorus loadings
are compared to those proposed by Vollenweider (Vollenweider
and Dillon, 1974). Essentially, his "dangerous" loading is
one at which the receiving water would become eutrophic or
remain eutrophic; his "permissible" loading is that which
would result in the receiving water remaining oligotrophic
or becoming oligotrophic if morphometry permitted. A meso-
trophic loading would be considered one between "dangerous"
and "permissible".
Note that Vollenweider's model may not be applicable to
water bodies with short hydraulic retention times.
Total Phosphorus Total Nitrogen
Total Accumulated Total Accumulated
grams/mVyr 0.67 0.59 5.24 3.00
Vollenweider phosphorus loadings
(g/m2/yr) based on mean depth and mean
hydraulic retention time of Palestine Reservoir:
"Dangerous" (eutrophic loading) 0.38
"Permissible" (oligotrophic loading) 0.19
-------
16
V. LITERATURE REVIEWED
Anonymous, 1971. Inventory of municipal waste facilities. EPA Pub.
No. OWP-1, vol. 6, Wash., DC.
Latchford, John B. Jr., 1974. Personal communication (morphometry).
TX Water Qual. Bd., Austin.
Smith, Stephen F., 1974. Fishery management recommendations. Fed.
Aid Proj. F-25-R-3, TX Parks & Wildlife Dept., Austin.
Vollenweider, R. A., and P. J. Dillon, 1974. The application of
the phosphorus loading concept to eutrophication research.
Natl. Res. Council of Canada Publ. No. 13690, Canada Centre
for Inland Waters, Burlington, Ontario.
Wyatt, Linda B., 1976. Personal communication (discharge points of
Tyler STPs). TX Water Qual. Bd., Austin.
-------
17
VI. APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
LAKE RANKINGS
-------
LAKE. DATA TO 8E USED IN SINKINGS
LAKE
CODE LAKE NAME
4801 AMISTAD LAKE
4802 BASTROP LAKE
4803 SELTON RESERVOIR
4804 BRAUNIG LAKE
4805 BRO*NWOOD LAKE
4806 LAKE BUCHANAN
4807 CADOO LAKE
4808 CALAVERAS LAKE
4809 CANYON RESERVOIR
4810 LAKE COLORADO CITY
4811 CORPUS CRISTI LAKE
4812 DIVERSION LAKE
4813 EAGLE MOUNTAIN LAKE
4814 FT PHANTOM HILL LAKE
4815 GARZA LITTLE ELM RESEWVO
4816 KEMP LAKE
4817 HOUSTON LAKE
4818 LAKE OF THE PINES
4819 LAVON RESERVOIR
4820 LIVINGSTON LAKE
4821 LYNDON B JOHNSON LAKE
4822 MEDINA LAKE
4823 LAKE MEREDITH
4824 PALESTINE LAKE
4825 POSSUM KINGDOM RESERVOIR
4826 SAN ANGELO RESERVOIR
482? SAM RAYBURN RESERVOIR
4828 E V SPENCE RESERVOIR
MEDIAN
TOTAL P
0.013
0:02?
0.016
0.134
0.027
0.036
0.055
0.038
0.010
0.042
0.113
0.025
0.024
0.060
0.045
0.023
0.097
0.031
0.063
0.196
0.042
0.010
0.021
0.031
0.023
0.098
0.029
0.036
MEDIAN
INOPG N
0.500
0.090
0.165
0.150
0.100
0.250
0.070
0.060
0.450
0.090
0.130
0.080
0.070
0.105
0.380
0.110
0.260
0.090
0.180
0.555
0.420
0.600
0.070
0.180
0.070
0.140
0.150
0.080
500-
MEAN SEC
371.f74
419.917
378.312
461.625
470.375
437.625
463.333
461.667
384.612
473.625
475.187
470.111
469.625
474.909
475.782
455.000
486.187
440.000
485.333
465.469
456.500
403.562
439.312
442.625
419.045
481.000
439.458
462.583
MEAN
CHLORA
2.042
12.392
6.025
22.762
4.887
8.606
14.808
22.500
2.500
12.675
19.756
15.867
5.662
6.317
14.156
10.217
16.650
12,919
5.400
16.112
8.100
12.944
3.037
10.619
9.495
24.675
6.267
11.775
15-
MIN oo
14.900
15.000
15.000
14.800
14.400
15.000
11.400
13.000
14.800
10.200
14.000
9.000
11.000
9. BOO
14.600
10.400
12.400
15.000
8.800
15.000
14.900
15.000
14.^00
14.800
15.000
10.200
15.000
15.000
MEDIAN
OISS O^TriO P
0.009
0.007
0.007
0.062
0.007
0.012
0.013
0.007
0.006
0.012
0.050
0.009
0.008
0.022
0.018
0.007
0.036
0.011
0.018
0.128
0.013
0.004
0.009
0.010
0.009
0.011
0.009
0.008
-------
LAKE DATA TO BE USED IN RANKINGS
LAKE
CODE LAKE NAME
4829 SOMERVILLE LAKE
4830 STAMFORD LAKE
4631 STILLHOUSE HOLLOW RESEHV
4832 TAWAKONI LAKE
4833 TEXARKANA LAKE
4834 TEXOMA LAKE
4835 TRAVIS LAKE
4836 TRINIDAD
4837 TWIN 8UTTES RESERVOIR
4838 WHITE RIVER RESERVOIR
4839 WHITNEY LAKE
MEDIAN
TOTAL P
0.053
0.073
O.Olb
0.046
O.lOb
0.042
0.018
0.389
0.029
0.020
0.028
MEDIAN
1NORG N
0.115
0.060
0.160
0.100
0.120
0.160
0.250
0.110
0.250
0.110
0.120
500-
MEAN SEC
473.033
482.714
406.250
466.417
478.500
451.321
389.913
479.500
454.917
434.500
430.500
MEAN
CHLOSA
24.^91
18.457
3.917
18.246
19.119
12.493
5.595
24.300
8.708
4.333
6.912
15-
MIN 00
13.000
10.600
15.000
13.200
12.400
15.000
15.000
10.000
14.800
15.000
15.000
MEOIAN
DISS GrfTriO if>
0.01 J
0.012
0.010
0.013
0.030
0.018
0.007
0.240
0.009
0.009
0.008
-------
LAKCS RANKED BY INDEX NOS,
RANK LAKE CODE LAKE NAME
INDEX NO
i 4809 CANI-ON RESERVOIR 445
2 4823 LAKE MEREDITH ^41
3 4813 EAGLE MOUNTAIN LAKE 430
4 4816 KEMP LAKE 423
5 4801 AMISTAO LAKE 402
6 4805 BROaNWOOD LAKE 394
7 4802 BASTRuP LAKE 393
8 4838 WHITE RIVER RESERVOIR 390
9 4825 POSSUM KINGDOM RESERVOIR 387
10 4835 TRAVIS LAKE 384
11 4803 BELTON RESERVOIR 384
12 4831 STILLHOUSE HOLLOW PESERV 372
13 4812 DIVERSION LAKE 372
14 4808 CALAVERAS LAKE 362
15 4839 WHITNEY LAKE 357
16 4822 MEDINA LAKE 342
17 4827 SAM RAYBURN RESERVOIR 322
18 4828 E V SPENCE RESERVOIR 321
19 4837 Twin BUTTES RESERVOIR 311
20 4810 LAKE COLORADO CITY 310
21 4824 PALESTINE LAKE 302
22 4818 LAKE OF THE PINES 298
23 4807 CADDO LAKE 297
24 4814 FT PHANTOM HILL LAKE 296
25 4806 LAKE BUCHANAN 261
26 4830 STAMFORD LAKE 259
27 4819 LAVON RESERVOIR 258
28 4832 TAWAKOM LAKE 253
-------
LAKES RANKED BY INDEX NOS.
RANK LAKE CODE LAKE NAME INOEX NO
29 4821 LYNDON 8 JOHNSON LAKE 238
30 4834 TEXOMA LAKE 217
31 4829 SOMERVILLE LAKE 208
32 4826 SAN ANGELO RESERVOIR 200
33 4833 TEXARKANA LAKE 176
34 4815 GARZA LITTLE ELM RESERvO 173
35 4836 TRINIDAD 169
36 4804 BRAUNIG LAKE 159
37 4811 CORPUS CRIST I LAKE 155
38 4817 HOUSTON LAKE 139
39 4820 LIVINGSTON LAKE 91
-------
PERCENT OF LAKES t(ITM HlGHtR VALUES (NUMBER OF LAKES wiTH HlGHE* VALUES)
LAKE
CODE LAKE NAME
4801 AMISTAD LAKE
4B02 HASTROP LAKE
4803 BELTON RESERVOIR
4804 BRAUNIG LAKE
4805 BROrfNWOOD LAKE
4806 LAKE BUCHANAN
4807 CADDO LAKE
4808 CALAVERAS LAKE
4809 CANYON RESERVOIR
4810 LAKE COLORADO CITY
4811 CORPUS CRIST I LAKE
4812 DIVERSION LAKE
4813 EAGLE MOUNTAIN LAKE
4814 FT PHANTOM HILL LAKE
4815 GARZA LITTLE ELM RESERVO
4816 KEMP LAKE
4817 HOUSTON LAKE
4818 LAKE OF THE PINES
4819 LAVON RESERVOIR
4820 LIVINGSTON LAKE
4821 LYNDON B JOHNSON LAKE
4822 MEDINA LAKE
4823 LAKE MEREDITH
4824 PALESTINE LAKE
4825 POSSUM KINGDOM RESERVOIR
4826 SAN ANOELO RESERVOIR
4827 SAM RAYBURN RESERVOIR
4828 E V SPENCE RESERVOIR
MEDIAN
TOTAL P
95
79
92
5
66
47
26
45
99
39
8
68
71
24
34
76
16
54
21
3
39
99
82
54
74
13
59
50
( 36)
( 30)
< 35)
( 2)
( 25)
( 18)
( 10)
( 17)
( 37)
( 14)
( 3)
( 26)
( 27)
( 9)
( 13)
( 29)
( 6)
( 20)
( 8)
( 1)
( 14)
( 37)
( 3D
( 20)
( 28)
( 5)
( 22)
( 19)
MEDIAN
INORG N
5
76
26
42
70
21
91
100
8
76
47
83
91
66
13
61
16
76
29
3
11
0
91
32
91
45
39
83
( 2)
( 28)
( 10)
( 16)
( 26)
( 7)
( 33)
< 38)
( 3)
( 28)
( 18)
( 31)
( 33)
( 25)
( 5)
( 22)
< 6)
( 28)
( 11)
( 1)
( 4)
( 0)
( 33)
( 12)
( 33)
( 17)
( 15)
( 31)
500-
MEAN SEC
100
b2
97
50
29
74
42
47
95
26
18
32
34
21
16
55
0
66
3
39
53
89
71
63
84
8
68
45
( 38)
( 3D
( 37)
( 19)
( 11)
( 28)
( 16)
( 18)
( 36)
( 10)
( 7)
( 12)
( 13)
( 8)
( 6)
< 21)
( 0)
( 25)
< 1)
( 15)
( 20)
( 34)
< 27)
( 24)
( 32)
( 3)
f 26)
( 17)
MEAN
CHLOHA
100
47
68
8
87
63
32
11
97
42
13
29
79
74
34
55
24
39
84
26
66
37
95
53
53
0
76
50
( 38)
( 18)
< 26)
( 3)
( 33)
( 24)
( 12)
( 4)
< 37)
( 16)
( 5)
( 11)
( 30)
( 28)
< 13)
( 21)
( 9)
( 15)
( 32)
( 10)
( 25)
( 14)
( 36)
( 20)
( 22)
( 0)
( 29)
( 19)
15-
MIN UO
39 (
17 (
17 (
49 (
58 <
17 (
76 <
67 (
49 (
88 (
61 (
97 (
79 <
95 (
55 (
84 (
72 (
17 (
100 (
17 (
39 (
17 (
39 (
49 (
17 (
88 (
17 (
17 (
14)
0)
0)
17)
22)
0)
29)
25)
17)
33)
23)
37)
30)
36)
21)
32)
27)
0)
38)
0)
14)
0>
14)
17)
0)
33)
0)
0)
MEDIAN
DISS OWTHO P
63
92
84
5
84
39
30
92
97
39
8
63
76
16
21
92
11
46
21
3
30
100
63
51
63
46
63
76
( 21)
( 34)
( 3D
( 2)
( 3D
( 14)
( 10)
( 34)
( 37)
( 14)
( 3)
( 21)
( 28)
( 6)
( 7)
( 34)
( 4)
( 17)
( 7)
( 1)
( 10)
( 38)
( 21)
( 19)
( 21)
( 17)
( 21)
( 28)
INDEX
NO
402
3-n
364
159
394
261
297
362
445
310
155
372
430
296
173
423
139
298
258
91
238
342
441
302
367
200
322
321
-------
PERCENT OF LAKES WITH HIGHER VALUES (NUMBER OF LAKES *ITH HIGHER VALUES)
LAKE
CODE LAKE NAME
4829 SOMERVILLE LAKE
4830 STAMFORD LAKE
4831 STILLHOUSE HOLLOW REStXV
4832 TAWAKONI LAKE
4833 TEXARKANA LAKE
4834 TEXOMA LAKE
4835 TRAVIS LAKE
4836 TKINIOAD
4837 TWIN BUTTES RESERVOIR
4838 WHITE RIVER RESERVOIR
4839 WHITNEY LAKE
MEDIAN
TOTAL P
21 (
18 (
88 (
32 (
11 (
39 <
88 (
0 (
59 (
84 (
63 (
11)
7)
33)
12)
4)
14)
33)
0)
22)
32)
34)
MEDIAN
INORG N
55
97
37
70
51
34
21
61
21
61
51
( 21)
( 37)
( 14)
( 26)
( 19)
( 13)
( 7)
( 22)
( 7)
< 22)
( 19)
500-
MEAN SEC
24 (
5 (
67 (
37 (
13 (
61 (
92 (
11 (
58 (
76 (
79 (
9)
2)
33)
14)
5)
23)
35)
4)
22)
29)
30)
MEAN
CHLORA
3
18
92
21
16
45
82
5
61
89
71
( 1)
( 7)
( 35)
( 8)
( 6)
< 17)
( 3D
( 2)
( 23)
( 34)
( 27)
15-
MIN DO
67
82
17
63
72
17
17
92
49
17
17
( 25)
( 3D
( 0)
( 24)
( 27)
( 0)
( 0)
( 35)
( 17)
( 0)
( 0)
MEDIAN
Diss U^THO P
30
39
51
30
13
21
84
0
63
63
76
( 10)
( 14)
( 19)
I 10)
( 5)
( 7)
( 3D
( 0)
( 21)
( 21)
( 28)
INDEX
NO
208
259
372
253
176
217
J84
169
311
390
357
-------
APPENDIX B
CONVERSION FACTORS
-------
CONVERSION FACTORS
Hectares x 2.471 = acres
Kilometers x 0.6214 = miles
Meters x 3.281 = feet
-4
Cubic meters x 8.107 x 10 - acre/feet
Square kilometers x 0.3861 = square miles
Cubic meters/sec x 35.315 = cubic feet/sec
Centimeters x 0.3937 = inches
f
Kilograms x 2.205 = pounds
Kilograms/square kilometer x 5.711 = Ibs/square mile
-------
APPENDIX C
TRIBUTARY FLOW DATA
-------
TRIBUTARY PLOW INFORMATION FOR T£XA5
04/14/76
LANE CODE 48?4
PALESTINE RESERVOIR
TOT-AL DRAINAGE AREA OF LAKE'SQ KM) 3201.5
SUB-DRAINAGE
TRIBUTARY AREAfSQ KM)
JAN
FEB
MAR
NORMALIZED FLOrfS(CMS)
APR MAr JUN JUL AUG
OCT
NOV
DtC
MEAN
4824A1
482-+A2
4824ril
482-«Cl
4824D1
4824ZZ
2201.5
564.6
170.9
600.9
60.1
805.5
10.87
0.363
1.02
3.77
0.453
5.13
12.94
0.566
1.10
4.70
0.481
5.97
20.47
0.311
0.71
6.40
0.255
5.49
29.17
1.341
2.75
9.51
0.934
10.70
30.87
2.520
2.78
8.27
0.934
12.03
15.29
6.230
1.10
4.02
0.340
5.97
3.40
0.068
0.57
0.34
0.170
1.53
1.67
2.152
0.28
0.23
0.085
1.19
4.05
4.078
0.71
0.42
0.255
2.80
2.01
0.425
0.93
1.39
0.340
3.26
5.75
5.947
0.96
1.7B
0.3^0
4.56
8.75
0.651
0.88
4.08
0.275
4.56
12.08
2.082
1.15
3.73
0.404
5.25
SUMMARY
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA OF LAKE = 2201.5
SUM OF SUB-DRAINAGE AREAS = 2202.0
TOTAL FLO* IN = 151.93
TOTAL FLO* OUT = 145.24
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS(CMS)
TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAR
4824A1
MEAN FLOW DAY
FLOW DAY
FLOW DAY
FLOW
4824A2
-------
TRIBUTARY FLOw INFORMATION FOR TEXAS
04/14/76
CODE 4824
PALESTINE RESERVOIR
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS(CMS)
TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAri
4624^1
4824CI
4824D1
4824ZZ
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
S
6
7
8
74
74
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
74
74
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
74
74
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
74
74
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
MEAN FLOW DAY
FLO* DAY
FLOW DAY
FLOW
0.595
0.311
4.729
2.492
1.926
3.313
1.982
2.379
3.596
1.076
0.082
0.028
2.095
1.1C4
16.849
8.920
6.853
11.836
7.108
8.580
12.884
3.794
0.283
0.040
0.210
0.110
1.699
0.906
0.680
1.189
0.708
0.850
1.303
0.368
0.028
0.085
15.008
12.743
11.044
10.760
11.638
25.315
9.401
9.571
26.193
19.482
1.161
0.793
7
14
23
30
26
23
23
6
4
6
19
17
7
14
23
30
26
23
23
6
4
6
19
17
7
14
22
30
25
22
22
6
3
6
19
17
0.119
0.150
0.566
2.322
0.821
0.878
1.954
0.595 IB
5.097 16
0.481
0.051
0.003
0.425
0.538
2.039
8.325
2.917
3.171
7.023
2.095 18
18.179 16
1.784
0.184
0.011
0.042
0.054
0.218
0.821
0.283
0.34U
0.906
0.210 Ib
2.888 16
0.178
0.017
0.001
3.3^3
1.303
12.120
4.644
1.218
0.453
-------
APPENDIX D
PHYSICAL and CHEMICAL DATA
-------
48?401
32 03 15.0 095 26 16.0
PALESTINE LAKE
48001 TEXAS
DATE
FROM
TO
74/03/09
74/05/17
74/08/13
74/11/01
DATE
FROM
TO
74/03/09
74/05/17
74/08/13
74/11/01
TIME
OF
DAY
12
12
12
12
12
12
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
15
15
15
15
15
40
40
40
40
40
48
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
00
00
00
00
00
TIME
OF
DAY
12
12
12
12
12
12
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
15
15
15
15
15
40
40
40
40
40
48
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
00
00
00
00
00
DEPTH
FEET
0000
0006
0015
0025
0040
0000
0000
0005
0015
0030
0040
0000
0005
0015
0025
0042
0000
0005
0015
0027
0041
DEPTH
FEET
0000
0006
0015
0025
0040
0000
0000
0001
0005
0006
0015
0030
0040
0000
0007
0000
0005
0015
0027
0041
OC010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
15. 8
15.6
15.1
15.0
13,4
23.2
23.0
22.5
21.0
19.1
27.0
26.9
26.8
26.8
22,9
22.6
22.3
22.3
22.1
22.0
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.022
0.021
0.021
0.021
0.023
0.036
0.033
0.043
fc . 0 5<»
0.046
0.031
0.029
0.028
0.032
.,0.037
00300 00077 00094
DO TRANSP CNOUCTVY
SECCHI FIELO
MG/L INCHES MICROMHO
72
9.1
8.8
8.8
8.2
55
5.0
3.2
2.8
1.2
54
4.6
4.0
4.0
0.2
6.4 47
7.6
6.6
6.0
5.6
32217 00031
CHLRPHYL INCDT LT
A HEMMING
UG/L PERCENT
3.1
1.7
50,0
1.0
2.6
1.0
3.3
108
111
105
100
102
152
152
148
142
141
196
196
195
196
218
141
146
147
147
144
llEPALtS 2111202
4 0044 FEET Q£MTri
00400 00410 00610 00625 00630 00671
pH T ALK NH3-N TOT KJEL N02&N03 PHOS-OIS
CAC03 TOTAL N N-TOTAL ORTriO
SU MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P
7.50
7.40
7.30
7.05
7.10
7.10
7.00
6.60
6.50
6.50
7.80
7.80
7.60
7.50
7.35
6.63
6.65
6.64
6.58
6.58
20 0.020
20 0.040
22 0.060
22 0.060
23 0.030
24 0.120
24 0.140
24 0.160
25 0.160
29 0.210
30 0.030
31 0.030
31 0.030
32 0.030
31 0.040
0.500
0.500
0.500
0.500
0.700
0.700
0.500
0.500
0.700
0.600
0.600
0.400
0.400
0.400
0.400
0.150
0.160
0.170
0.170
0.1SU
0.060
0.070
0.080
0.070
0.170
0.200
0.200
0.200
0.210
0.220
0.008
0.006
0.012
0.009
0.010
0.020
0.017
0.018
0.018
0.026
0.007
0.011
0*009
0.010
0.012
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/02/11
482*02
32 Ua 46.0 095 26 08.0
PALESTINE LAKE
48073 TEXAS
UEFALtS 2111202
<• 0034 FEET DEPTH
DATE
FROM
TO
74/03/0*
74/05/17
74/08/13
74/11/01
TIME
OF
DAY
13
13
13
13
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
14
14
14
14
20
20
20
20
05
05
05
05
15
15
15
15
15
35
35
35
35
DEPTH
FEET
0000
0006
0015
0030
0000
0005
0015
0032
0000
0005
0015
0025
0035
0000
0005
0015
0038
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
16.3
16.3
16.2
15.1
24.7
24.6
24.5
23.6
27.3
27.3
26.9
26.9
25.0
22.9
22.6
22.5
22.3
00665
DATE
FROM
TO
74/03/09
74/05/17
74/08/13
74/11/01
TIME
OF
DAY
13
13
13
13
1
1
1
1
1
11
11
11
14
14
14
14
20
20
20
20
05
05
05
05
05
05
15
15
35
35
^5
35
DEPTH
FEET
0000
0006
0015
0030
0000
0001
0005
0006
0015
0032
0000
0008
0000
0005
001S
0038
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.024
.022
.022
.026
.023
.029
.031
.034
00300 00077 00094
DO TrtAMSP CNDUCTVY
SECCHI FIELD
MG/L INCHES MICSOMHO
72
9.3
8.7
8.1
47
6.0
4.0
4.4
5.4 48
5.
4.
4.
0.
7.
6.
6.
6.
32217
6
6
0
2
2 60
8
6
8
00031
114
115
115
119
161
162
160
150
198
198
198
198
221
145
146
148
145
00400 00410 00610 00625 00630 00671
PH T ALK NH3-N TOT KJEL N02&.N03 PnOS-DIS
CAC03 TOTAL N N-TOTAL ORTr,o
SLI rt&'L Mt>/L MG/L MG/L MG/L P
7.
7.
7.
6.
6.
6.
6.
6.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
6.
6.
6.
6.
20
25
00
90
65
90
60
55
70
65
50
50
30
90
78
70
66
21 0.030 0.700 0.140 0.011
22 0.020 0.500 0.140 0.008
23 0.030 0.600 0.140 0.012
21 0.050 0.500 0.130 0.008
23 0.110 0.700 0.080 0.010
23 0.100 0.500 0.040 0.008
25 0.140 0.500 0.050 0.012
24 0.1<*0 0.500 0.050 0.012
35 0.040 0.600 0.170 0.015
35 0.030 0.500 0.180 0.013
34 0.040 0.500 0.180 0.010
32 0.060 0.600 0.160 0.010
CHLRPHYL INCDT LT
A
UG/L
3.
4.
tfEMNING
PERCENT
4
5
50.0
1.0
34.5
0
0
0
0
.046
.033
.031
.059
5.
1.0
1
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL CATt 76/03/11
482403
32 06 40.0 095 2o 19.0
PALESTINE LAKE
4821J TE*AS
DATE TIME DEPTH
FROM OF
TO DAY FEET
74/03/09 14 00 0000
14 00 0006
14 00 0015
14 00 0021
74/05/17 1
1
1
1
74/08/13 1
1
1
1
1 25 0000
1 ?5 0005
1 25 0015
1 25 0021
1 45 0000
1 45 0005
1 45 0015
1 45 0020
74/11/01 14 15 0000
14 15 0005
14 15 0015
14 15 0025
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
16.3
16.7
16.4
15.4
25.2
25.2
25.0
25.0
28.4
27.9
27.1
26.9
22.8
22.4
22.3
21.7
llEPiLtS
00300
00
MG/L
9.4
8.9
7.7
6.6
6.0
6.6
8.2
7.0
3.6
3.4
6.8
7.0
6.0
5.6
00077
TRANSP
SECCHI
INCHES
&9
54
72
60
00094
CNOUCTVY
FIELD
MICROMHO
123
128
128
134
168
168
166
165
204
204
204
204
147
146
145
142
4
00400
PH
su
7.40
7.40
7. 20
6.90
6.90
7.00
7.10
6.90
8.10
7.90
7.60
7.40
6.79
6.66
6.59
6.67
211
1202
0025 FEET DEPTH
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
21
15
15
15
24
24
24
23
37
36
43
42
00610
NHJ-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.030
0.020
0.030
0.060
0.100
0.120
0.100
0.100
0.050
0.050
0.070
0.090
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.600
0.600
0.500
0.600
0. '00
0.600
0.600
0.600
0.200
0.200K
0.500
0.600
00630
N02&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0. 120
0.100
0.090
0.080
0.040
0.040
0.050
0.050
0.120
0.110
0.110
0.110
00671
HHOS-G1S
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.00V
0.009
0.008
0.009
0.007
0.011
0.009
0.010
0.011
0.018
0.014
0.015
DATE
FROM
TO
74/03/09
74/05/17
74/08/13
74/11/01
00665 32217 00031
TIME DEPTH PHOS-TOT CHLRPHYL INCDT LT
OF A REMNING
DAY FEET
14
14
14
14
11
11
11
11
11
11
14
14
14
14
00
00
00
00
25
25
25
25
45
45
15
15
15
15
0000
0006
0015
0021
0000
0005
0015
0021
0000
0010
0000
0005
0015
0025
MG/L P UG/L PERCENT
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.028 4.5
.027
.023
.027
.029 4.7
.031
.028
.028
31.9
1.0
.037 4.7
.038
.037
.047
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/03/11
32 U 40.0 OVS
PALESTINE
32.0
DATE
FROM
TO
74/03/09
74/05/17
74/08/13
74/11/01
DATE
FROM
TO
74/03/09
74/05/17
74/08/13
74/11/01
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
14 30 0000
14 30 0006
11 45 0000
11 45 0005
11 45 0011
12 15 0000
12 15 0005
12 15 0009
13 55 0000
13 55 0005
13 55 0011
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
14 30 0000
14 30 0006
11 45 0000
11 45 0005
11 45 0911
12 15 0000
13 55 0000
13 55 0005
13 55 0011
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
18.5
18.4
26.4
26.4
26.3
28.9
28.8
28.3
22.2
21.7
21.6
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.033
0.028
0.053
0.052
0.053
0.052
0.051
0.055
00300
DO
MG/L
8.
7.
7.
8.
8.
7.
6.
6.
6.
32217
7
2
2
6
2
0
8
6
6
CHLRPHYL
A
UG/L
4.
19.
30.
11.
3
3
5
8
00077
THftNSP
SECCHI
INCHES
60
35
66
47
00031
INCDT LT
REMNING
PERCENT
0009<-
CNDUCTv •
FIELD
MICPOMK
If.
140
211
211
210
21-
21-
21-
133
132
131
4
00400
PH
su
7
6
7
7
7
3
8
6
7
6
6
.00
.90
.10
.45
.50
.60
.45
.15
.41
.67
.89
Lta 21112C2
0010 FEET .•£-"
00-10 OOMO 0062 =
T AL« NH3-N TOT Kj£w
CAC03 TOTAL
MG/L MG/L
14 u.020
15 U.020
29 0.040
30 0.030
31 0.040
40 0.050
40 0.070
41 0.070
N
MG/L
0.700
0.600
1.000
o.aoo
0.700
0.600
0.400
0.300
00630
N02&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.030
0.020
U.020
0.020
0.020
0.020
0.020
0.020
C 0 *, 1 1
0.010
o.oov
0 . '/ '* "'
0 . '. i <•
0 . ', : ^
-------
APPENDIX E
TRIBUTARY DATA
-------
STORE! KETRIEVAL DATE 76/03/10
32 02 25.0 095 26 10.0 4
NEOES RIVEW
4837S Ib bULLARD
•0-XPALt.STlNE RESERVOIR
H*Y 175 BRDli 1 MI N« OF
IIE^ALES 2111204
0000 FEET Dtf-'TH CLASS 00
DATE
FROM
TO
74/09/07
74/10/ 14
74/11/22
74/12/30
75/01/25
75/02/2?
75/03/23
75/04/06
75/04/18
75/05/03
75/Ci/lb
75/06/06
75/07/18
75/08/17
00630 00625
TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TOTAL N
DAY FEET
10
12
16
14
11
13
11
10
13
09
14
10
10
09
36
10
45
48
48
35
10
39
50
50
15
15
40
43
MG/L
(I
0
u
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.120
.280
.176
,04n
.024
.024
.010
.017
.025
.010
.025
.065
.125
.035
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
600
300
300
900
600
400
450
350
300
800
600
850
450
550
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PHOS-OIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
c.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0*
0.
0.
035
040
025
024
016
016
015
020
035
030
055
085
060
055
MG/L
0.
0.
3.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0*
0.
0.
0.
0.
P
005K
005K
010
010
OOBK
008K
005K
005K
005K
005K
005
005K
005
0*005K
MG/L P
0.030
0.015
0.010
0.020
0.010
0.030
0.020
0.020
0.010K
0.060
0.010
0.020
0.040
0.040
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
RETRIEVAL DATE 76/03/10
32 21 52.0 095 27 15.0 4
NEC-itS RIVE*
48 7.S CHANOLEK
T/PflLESTINE HESEKVOIk
Hrff 273 3«D6 1 Ml * JCT M HWY
IIE^ALES 211120'*
0000 FEET OEPTh CLASS 00
DAiE
F^OM
Tu
74/0*/07
74/10/14
74/11/23
74/12/30
75/01/26
75/U2/23
75/03/23
75/04/06
75/04/18
75/05/04
75/05/16
75/06/06
75/07/19
75/0
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 76/03/iO
DATE TIME DEPTH N02J.N03
FROM OF
TO DAY FEET
74/09/0 1
74/10/1'*
74/11/23
74/12/30
75/01/26
75/02/23
75/03/23
75/04/06
75/04/18
75/05/04
75/05/16
75/06/06
75/07/19
75/08/17
11 21
12 45
10 ?0
15 3?
10 10
10 25
11 00
11 17
14 22
09 ?.(,
13 ?0
11 00
11 25
10 16
482*01
32 13 00.0 095 39 40.0 4
FLAT CREEK
48 ID FRANKSTON
i5T^4E RESERvOIk
RD 6C7 3RDG 1 MI
11EPALES
0000 FEET DEPTH
S OF LEAGUEVILLE
2111204
CLASS 00
0630
'(.N03
OTAL
iG/L
O.ObO
0.056
0.072
0.072
0.047
0.080
0.020
0.060
0.105
1.000
0.060
0.080
0.080
0.080
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.600
0.600
0.500
0.600
0.500
0.500
0.600
0.450
0.600
0.700
0.650
0.550
0.550
0.800
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
Mf,/L
0.040
0.070
0.065
0.072
0.032
0.056
0.020
0.055
0.060
0.315
0.105
0.050
0.050
0.100
00671
PrlOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.025
0.075
0.025
0.024
0.022
0.024
0.020
0.020
0.025
0.053
0.035
0.035
0.035
0.040
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.040
0.102
0.040
0.040
0.060
0.040
0.045
0.050
0.060
0.060
0.080
0.070
0.070
0.130
-------
STOHET RETRIEVAL DATE 7o/03/10
DATE TIME DEPTH N02J.N03
FROM OF
TO DAY FEET
7W09/07
74/10/14
74/11/23
74/12/30
75/01/36
75/02/33
75/03/23
75/04/06
75/04/18
75/05/04
75/05/16
75/06/06
75/07/19
75/08/17
11
13
10
15
10
10
11
11
14
09
15
11
11
10
45
00
45
55
25
37
20
35
40
45
16
15
40
37
32 le 30.0 095 36 25.0 4
KIC"oPOO CREEK
43 15 6ROWNSBORO
T/PALESTINE RESERVOIR
2NOWT RD 314 8RDG 1 Ml NE OF bROWNSBORO
11EPALE.S 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
0630
'{.N03
OTAL
IG/L
0.136
0.064
0.016
0.012
C.025
0.032
0.010
0.060
0.030
0.085
0.220
0.690
0.195
0.050
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.700
0.700
0.300
0.800
0.300
0.400
0.650
0.500
0.850
0.900
1.050
0.600
0.550
0.800
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.075
0.040
0.065
0.104
0.024
0.024
0.035
0.055
0.080
0.065
0.180
0.330
0.045
0.130
00671
PHOS-OIS
OPTMO
MG/L P
0.050
0.055
0.020
0.015
0.008
0.016
0.020
0.020
0.025
0.030
0.067
0.065
0.080
0.135
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.0 bO
0.097
0.020
0.030
0.040
0.050
0.060
0.060
0.060
0.140
0.120
0.110
0.250
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/03/10
DATE TIME DEPTH N02t>N03
FROM OF
TO DAY FEET
74/09/07
74/10/1*
74/11/82
74/13/30
75/01/25
75/02/22
75/03/22
75/04/06
75/04/18
75/05/03
75/05/16
75/06/06
75/07/19
75/OB/17
09 00
11 15
15 50
14 00
10 45
12 30
10 13
12 18
13 00
09 00
14 55
09 20
09 45
09 55
32 la 38.0 095 26 20. C 4
48 7.5 CHftNDLEU
T/PALESTINE RESERVOIR
2NOAr»Y »0 2661 6HDG 2.5 HI E OF CrtANDLES
11EFALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
0630
K.N03
OTAL
IG/L
•J.048
0.032
C.096
0.112
0.160
0.136
0.045
0.055
0.080
0.110
0.105
0.060
0.050
0.055
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.400
0.300
0.200
0.800
0.300
0.500
0.300
0.200
0.350
0.650
1.150
0.350
0.275
0.300
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.025
0.025
0.025
0.048
0.008
0.032
0.025
0.035
0.045
0.055
0.095
0.050
0.027
0.025
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.020
0.020
0.005
0.016
0.008
0.016
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.020
0.025
0.050
0.027
0.025
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.045
0.035
0.010K
0.100
0.020
0.060
0.030
0.020
0.030
0.040
0.120
0.080
0.060
0.060
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 7S/03/1C
7^/11/20
7^/12/30
75/01/25
75/02/22
75/03/22
75/0*»/06
75/0<»/18
75/05/03
75/05/16
75/06/06
75/07/19
75/08/17
32 lt> 38.0 095 26 05.0 4
BUTLC-* CKEEr.
48 7.b CHANDLER
T/PALESUNE RtSERVOIfc
2NDKT KD 2661 riRUG 3.5 MI S JCT rl*Y
IIE^ALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
31
DATE
FROM OK
TO DAY
TIME DEPTH
FEET
11 24
16 00
14 05
10 53
12 37
10 22
12 27
13 09
09 10
13 ?6
09 00
09 55
10 00
00630
N02&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.200
0.176
0.112
0.136
0.096
0.104
0.090
0.135
0.140
0.150
0.125
0.210
0.200
0.320
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.500
0.300
0.600
0.900
0.300
0.400
0.450
0.500
0.550
0.650
0.800
0.750
0.350
0.250
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.090
0.055
0.060
0.072
0.040
0.032
0.035
0.080
0.120
0.145
0.100
0.150
0.060
0.030
00671
PriOS-OIS
OPTHO
MG/L P
0.025
0.010
0.010
0.015
0.016
0.016
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.020
0.025
0.020
0.010
0.015
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.033
0.020
0.020
0.030
0.020
0.040
0.030
0.030
0.040
0.060
0.090
0.030
0.020
0.040
-------
STOSET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/03/10
4B24F1
32 12 45.0 095 23 45.0 4
SALINE C^EEK
48 SMITH CO H*Y MAP
T/PflLESTlNE RESERVOIR
2NDA*Y RU 2868 B«OG 10.0 MI Srt Of TYLtw
11EHALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
DATE TIME DEPTH N02&N03
FROM OF
TO DAY FEET
74/09/07
74/10/14
74/11/22
74/12/30
75/01/25
75/02/22
75/03/22
75/04/06
75/04/18
75/05/03
75/05/16
75/06/06
75/07/19
75/08/17
09 52
11 40
16 15
14 17
11 11
12 52
10 45
10 11
13 25
09 25
13 40
09 58
10 10
10 10
0630
&N03
OTAL
G/L
0.390
0.320
0.288
0.184
•J.336
0.368
0.350
0.440
0.410
0.300
0.195
0.410
0.550
0.065
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.600
0.300
0.400
2.300
0.400
0.500
0.450
0.200
0.600
0.750
0.850
0.550
0.500
0.550
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.040
0.040
0.055
0.176
0.080
0.088
0.045
0.080
0.125
0.125
0.105
0.095
.0.070
0.060
00671
PHOS-OIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.030
0.010
0.005
0.010
0.008K
0.016
0.010
0.005
0.015
0.030
0.045
0.015
0.030
0.025
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.090
0.037
0.010
0.030
0.050
0.030
0.020
0.050
0.060
0.100
0.030
0.070
0.070
K ".VALOFTR'NOHN TO HE
LESS T.HAN INDICATED
------- |