&EPA
           United States
           Environmental Protection
           Agency
          Office of Research and
          Development
          Washington. DC 20460
EPA/600/R-98/119
September 1998
Uranium-Radium in
Water Performance
Evaluation Study

A Statistical Evaluation
of the June 12, 1998 Data

-------
      Uranium-Radium in Water
    Performance Evaluation Study
           June 12, 1998
   Environmental Protection Agency
National Exposure Research Laboratory
   Environmental Sciences Division
         Las Vegas, Nevada

-------
            UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                        OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
                      NATIONAL EXPOSURE RESEARCH LABORATORY
                      ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES DIVISION-LAS VEGAS
                                  P.O. BOX 93478
                            LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89193-3478
                                   (702/798-2100)
Dear Participant,

   Enclosed are the results of the Environmental Sciences Division (ESD-LV)
Performance Evaluation Study for Uranium-Radium in Water; June 12, 1998.

   The known value for each analysis was determined by gravimetric methods,
checked by chemical analyses performed by ESD-LV's Radiochemistry Laboratory,
and compared to the participating laboratories' grand average.
   The expected precision, determined by the known value, was taken from
"Table 3. Laboratory Precision:  One Standard Deviation Values and Control Limits
for Various Analyses", which is based on data accumulated over the years by the
Performance Evaluation Program, and can be found in the Environmental Radioactivity
Performance Evaluation Studies Program and Radioactive Standards Distribution
Program information brochure.

   Please take a few minutes to review this report and the analytical data your
laboratory submitted to us.  If there are any apparent discrepancies, please notify us
immediately.

   We encourage you to make use of the computer-automated data-entry system
that has been in place for some time now. As the number of participants increases,
and it becomes unrealistic for us to receive results by mail or FAX, the computer
system will be our only avenue for accepting data.
   If you have any questions or comments, please send a message via the data-entry
system or contact Stephen Pia at 702/798-2102 or Patricia Honsa at 702/798-2141.

                                          Sincerely,   /I
                                          Stephen Pia
                                          Team Leader
                                          RADQA Program
Enclosure

-------
               NOTICE

This material has been funded wholly by
the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
It has been subjected to the Agency's review,
and has been approved for publication as
an EPA document.

-------
      ESD-LV Performance Evaluation: Uranium-Radium in Water, 12-Jun-1998   1/20


   The following pages consist of separate sections for each of the nuclides in this study with four
parts per section. After the first, each part is separated from the next by a new page or a thick
horizontal bar.  The first page of each section is a statistical summary for the nuclide and starts
with a statement of the known value, the control limits, and the warning limits.

   The warning limits are placed at two normalized standard deviations above and below the
known value and the control limits are three normalized standard deviations above and below
the known value. If you keep control charts, these values will be useful for anticipating problems
with the accuracy of your analytical methods.

   The coin shaped pie chart at the top of the summary page shows the fate of all the samples
sent out in number and percentage terms. The pie chart starts at the top and rotates clockwise.
The first sector represents those participants who submitted analytical results within both the
warning and control limits. The next sector represents those who are in the warning region but
not out of control. The third sector represents those who are out of control, but have passed
the outlier test.  The fourth sector represents those who have failed the outlier test. The last
sector represents those participants who have failed to respond properly. This is the case if no
analytical results were returned, or less than three determinations were  reported, or if the results
were received too late.  The reeding on the edge of the coin is spaced at one percent intervals, and
the sector shading becomes darker as the data reliability decreases. Sectors with zero width are
not shown.

   The table in the center shows a number of statistical quantities calculated from the submitted
data based on the mean and median values in relation to the known value, both before and after
outlier removal. The lower pie chart uses the same construction as the upper chart and shows
the distribution of properly submitted data in terms of deviation from the known value divided
into sectors representing one, two, three, and greater than three normalized standard deviations.

   The second part is an alphabetical listing, in lab-code order, of submitted data and several
calculated quantities. An entry that is shaded has been rejected because of one of the reasons
listed above or failure of the outlier test. The fifth and sixth columns are a measure of laboratory
precision. The Range analysis is a normalized value that you may use to keep precision control
charts. The eighth and ninth columns are the differences from the mean of all non-outliers and
from the known value, respectively.  If this value is between 2.0 and 3.0,  your analytical process
precision is in the warning zone; if it exceeds 3.0 it is out of control. A tag symbol may appear in
the last column. Each page with tags has a symbol definition summary at the bottom. If there is
no tag symbol, the data is within the control limits, but it may be in the warning zone.

   The third part is a three-column listing of result average, tag symbol, and lab-code in average
order excluding those labs not responding properly. In this order, all outliers and out-of-control
results appear at the top or bottom of the list.
   The last part is two bar chart displays showing frequency distributions of responding
participants. The first chart places the known value at the center and a bar at each 0.2 unit of
expected precision.  The second  chart places the mean of the reported measurements at the center
and a bar at each 0.2 unit of standard deviation. In both cases, a bar includes those results within
0.1 unit up to the maximum of six. Any results more than six units from the center value are
shown cumulatively by a shaded bar one past  the sixth unit. If the central tendency of the known
value distribution falls away from the center, an error in accuracy is indicated. If the distribution
is broad, poor precision is indicated. The mean value distribution is similar but uses the average
and standard deviation of reported results as its basis.

-------
2/20   ESD-LV Performance Evaluation: Uranium-Radium in Water, 12-Jun-1998


     The Range Analysis(R + SR) is calculated from the range, mean range and standard error of
  the range values. The range is the difference between the maximum and minimum results for the
  laboratory. The mean range is calculated by multiplying the expected precision by 1.693(for three
  results).  The standard error of the range is calculated by multiplying the mean range by 2.575(for
  three results), subtracting the mean range from this product, and dividing the result by 3. If the
  range is greater than the mean range, then the range analysis is calculated by subtracting the
  mean range from the range, dividing the result by the standard error of the range and adding 1.
  If the mean range is greater than or equal to the range, then the range analysis is calculated by
  dividing the range by the mean range.

     The normalized deviation of the mean from the grand average is calculated from the deviation
  of the mean from the grand average and the standard error of the mean values. The deviation of
  the mean from the grand average is calculated by subtracting the grand average from the
  average of the laboratory's three results. The standard error of the mean is calculated by
  dividing the expected precision by the square root  of 3(the number of results). The normalized
  deviation of the mean from the grand average is calculated by dividing the deviation of the mean
  from the grand average by the standard error of the mean.
     The normalized deviation of the mean from the known value is calculated from the deviation of
  the mean from the known value and the standard  error of the mean values. The deviation of the
  mean from the known value is calculated by subtracting the known value from the average of the
  laboratory's three results.  The standard error of the mean is calculated by dividing the expected
  precision by the square root of 3(the number of results). The normalized deviation of the mean
  from the known value is calculated by dividing the deviation of the mean from the known value by
  the standard error of the mean.

     A complete explanation of the statistical calculations involved in the report may be found in
  the Environmental Radioactivity Performance Evaluation Studies Program information brochure
  [Draft Revision of EPA-600/4-81-004], available from Patricia Honsa, ESD-LV, 702/798-2141.

-------
        ESD-LV Performance Evaluation: Uranium-Radium in Water,  12-Jun-1998    3/20
Uranium (Natural)                  Statistical Summary                      148 Participants

The known value of this nuclide is 3.0 pCi/1 with an expected precision of 3.0;  the control limits

are 0.0 to 8.2; the warning regions are 0.0 to 0.0 and 6.5 to 8.2
47(31.8 %) Failed to respond
5(3.4 %) Outliers '
         Statistic
                96(64.9 %) Within all limits
Respondents
Non-outliers
Mean
Std. Dev.
Variance
%Coef. ofVar.
% deviation of mean from known value
Norm. dev. of mean from known value
Median
% deviation of median from known value
Norm. dev. of m^rfi^n from known value
4.66
7.97
63.45
170.89
55.38
0.21
3.07
2.22
0.01
Grand Avg 3.15
0.67
0.45
21.18
5.09
0.23
3.07
2.22
0.10
5(5.0 %) Mor* than 3 norm. S.D.
           ; 92(91.1 %) Within 1 norm. S.D.
           •
                           of known value
                                                           4(4.O %) Between 1 and 2 norm. S.D.

-------
4/20 E8D-LV Performance Evaluation: Uranium-Radium
^Hl
in Water, 12-Jun-1998
Uranium (Natural)
Lab
A
AE
AF
AH
AJ
AK
AL
•^ v. •> y
$ฃ ^Ljfr*
^>ฃ^%'ฃA
AR
, Att
AW
AZ
BA
BC
BG
BH
BK
BM
BN
BO
C
CA
•:cc-
CE
CJ
CS
CX
D
DB
DE
' 'iW "
r Mff" '
DO
m
DT
DZ
E
EB
EL
ER
B"E
FJ
FN
GN
Res. 1
3.0
3.3
3.7
3.0
2.7
3.2
3.4
-. -^ s ' s,. 4f ' ,,v' $,'
<., , -x iv'& *•<••
_> "• -. •- -• '
3.9
3.1
3.6
2.7
V ^ ;• vvff
3.9
3.1
3.2
3.1
3.2
2.8
3.0
" , *
2.4
3.0
3.2
3.4
3.1
2.2
3.0
" " *" J*V'^" ,'
' ,', ".ซ"' *' ".- r>**
2.8
-. ; ,x \ * "•
3.1
4.9
3.1
3.0
__3.4_
3.3
? „' '•-',' ^ p. •• ^ <, j.
* ' f "•" ^ ji ^^ / '^ V/*'''-^''1
'. •*'•• V"^""^' \ *0>
2.7
/, '" '^ * ''
4.2
3.2
4.5
2.8

3.0
3.2
3.6
3.1
3.2
3.1
3.2
'• - ' '- ''- % :: ":•
2.7
3.0
3.0
3.5
2.9
2.6
3.0
' "S"ป vซ!" x-"",""v
<;-, /f5-"*.;'"^"*!;?,; " ••;
	 ^2.8_^ ^
' ' ** V^-.^' "" "•* ' f^f '•('•*••
2.8
4.5
2.7
2.8
.„, ^jya^.
3.2
"^'h',"\^fJ^'^-i'S--
3.2
0.2
3.6
Res. 3
3.0
3.6
3.3
2.8
3.8
3.6
3.2

j->

2.8
I' ""
4.4
2.9
4.5
2.8

3.9
3.2
2.9
2.1
3.1
3.4
2.8

2.4
2.9
3.0
3.6
3.1
1.9
3.0
T- <$y ™~ff'•-
, - --.^ V ',. " '^ *•
2.77
4.17
3.07
4.20
2.77

3.60
3.17
3.23
2.77
3.17
3.10
3.00
2.50
2.97
3.07
3.50
3.03
2.23
3.00
v v tw ^ { •• v "' ''

2.87

2.97
4.73
2.90
2.77
3.43
•> \ ' (^
3.20

3.20
0.17
3.60
TAG SYMBOLS
Determined
to be an outlier
-0.09
0.08
0.24
-0.18
0.20
0.20
0.10
""•• \ *^r " ' "~'V
%x \;"j, " /, >T
'X^11 "'•• "? I*. "•
-0.22
0.59
-0.05
0.60
-0.22

0.26
0.01
0.05
-0.22
0.01
-0.03
-0.09
-0.38
-0.11
-0.05
0.20
-0.07
-0.53
-0.09
//""™~r
•• ^ * i
-0.17
*'
-0.11
0.91
-0.15
-0.22
0.16
0.03

0.03
-1.72
0.26
0.00
0.17
0.33
-0.10
0.29
0.29
0.19
"™v^w ? x1™ y? '-t^1" *" ".•. / """•
^\** >^\1' ^ ,.xX A ^ ^ XsK >.
r;™"--^*-^-,','' ^\'\Z? '. . , -,/••
-0.13
0.67
0.04
0.69
.„, '9-,1! „
' - ', >\s< ' *' ' t -
0.35
0.10
0.13
-0.13
0.10
0.06
^^;-:-
-0.29
-0.02
0.04
0.29
0.02
-0.44
0.00
"-V" „. ,;i _'"; :?•> "i\S.-''^>^y^
' '"" ;O- "***,.„ !"/,""' : > ',
-0.08
^t'^r^-*:f"
-0.02
1.00
-0.06
-0.13
0.25
^^^^BS?
0.12
'*/>ป? !-\./^\' ,' *',"
0.12
-1.64
0.35
ft s Above control limit
•li = Below control limit

-------

ESD-LV Performance Evaluation: Uranium-Radium in Water, 12-Jun-1998 5/20
Uranium (Natural)
Lab
GQ
HE
HK
HL
HP
I
ID
J
JE
JG
JK
JN
-,J8:>
OX
JY
K
KH
w?
KT
L
LF
LH
LZ
M
MX
N
NA

NH
NJ
NK
iปs "
NO
Or
OB
Res. 1
3.4
2.7
3.2
3.2
3.6
3.3
3.3
X
2.8
*
2.8
3.0
?,^!^66i!&P:
- ' ,, *„ , -,
3.0
3.0
_ 2.9_
•< <
3.0
3.2
3.2

3.2
Y ,
5.9
2.8
,

3.0
3.1
\ .Y^xYxY'" "Y,
*" Y V "*% ,. ' •• ^\ v>y •X?
•' ", ,.1 .s\-\,-
-.' :S^/-'-^;^;^
4^3
tซ>- X:-Eff

''•Ojjp
P
y\^%t$ai^
S: '1>^>^^$
"3.5
Res. 2 Res. 3
2.9
2.8
3.4
3.0
3.3
3.4
3.3
-
2.9
*
2.9
3.1
Vv&9.e

3.4
3.6
^__2.9
\ s
4.0
3.0
3.0
- -s 5 t ~.
3.1

5.2
2.4 	
s
c \ ซ
4.8
3.2
;.y - '', .YvOv'v-sV
N>1 %,ซ!?!'' '•'"•'"• ^\. 0 ' \ *
% " ^^\ , •• vt ":;t'-V\
'<^\o ^ ^^ ^ปss *• C: -.ป•>••
34;SllSI4f
4.3
"|?f{||%4Y^f
|^^^fx>^
%^l"*.1f -;.!*/^ ~,
' '""" 4.2
* ••WPt^* i *•.••.>.' "•• •* . . \i , '*.., __ &v?a*". x •. o^1--. '•i
' -BT flPr '••-.'' *. \% sv,! * v1 %v , , •ซ v
•per
PW
,,PXY
Q
QM
QQ
• =
0 2
-r:r^9;7l.
4.6
|"-:l>30i6^
4.0
4.2
2.5
"^flOJ' ^
3.5
'V/i-JoSi' r:
4.0
4.2
2.1
3.2
2.7
3.4
2.8
3.3
3.8
3.2

2.6

2.8
3.4
58.6
<
2.7
3.4
2.8
s •*
5.0
3.0
2.7

3.1
-
4.4
2.6


5.4
2.9
>M™'ป

V--'-1 -'
^i\. *
3.2
xf-'*:.:':.
; 5*^.7
, ;, "• ,
4.8
^^s „•>
"1L2Y
5.7
33.0
3.0
4.2
2.6
No data submitted
Insufficient
data
x =
Exper.
Sigma
0.25
0.06
0.12
0.20
0.17
0.26
0.06

0.15

0.06
0.21
OJ1

0.35
0.31
0.06
<
1.00
0.12
0.25

0.06

0.75
0.20


1.25
0.15




0.64
\ *% „
4.65
-'
0.65

0.78
1.10
4.24
0.58
0.00
0.26
Rnganal
(R + SR) Average
0.098
0.020
0.039
0.079
0.059
0.098
0.020

0.059

0.020
0.079
0.315
s
0.138
0.118
0.020

0.394
0.039
0.098
<
0.020

0.295
0.079


0.473
0.059




0.217

2:583

0.256

0.295
0.433
2.058
0.197
0.000
0.098
3.17
2.73
3.33
3.00
3.40
3.50
3.27
-
2.77

2.83
3.17
59.4*1
s \
3.03
3.33
2.87

4.00
3.07
2.97

3.13

5.17
2.60
N

4.40
3.07
'\: "\-\Y ' "x '

Y, ; , Y\, : -
V'x-_V, \-
3.93
* ** •• ^ ^ x \S|*
48.13
• . , -":,;Y'
4.17
, ,5
10.57Y
4.60
3l83
3.67
4.20
2.40
TAG SYMBOLS
Determined
to be an
outlier
Normalized deviation
(grand-avg) (known) Tag
0.01
-0.24
0.10
-0.09
0.14
0.20
0.07

-0.22
"
-0.18
0.01
^52!51 - ~ :
^
-0.07.
0.10
-0.17 _

0.49
-0.05
-0.11
*
-0.01

1.16
-0.32
v

0.72
-0.05
-1 - ,y* \\'; -
^ "" •i1'1^ ^ s •• *" \ ^
^ % ^ ^ !; ^ \l * ซ " " ^% -
\\;V:ซ'-v-ซ "' "s
0.45
;- ^;!!!ฅ:;?^ :"";?
:." "&&ฃ(> ' . '
-lV I -^^vi """'••'
	 J.59 __
V rt ซ^ ^VWV^V..^^^ ^"-"^
' -'''-iias- ^
0.84
: >:' 26:62 ' -
0.30
0.60
-0.43
tt = Above
11 = Below
0.10
-0.15
0.19
0.00
0.23
0.29
0.15
< •
-0.13
*
-0.10
0.10
32ป60 X
* *
0.02
0.19
-0.08
*
0.58
0.04
-0.02
'•••'
0.08
•
1.25
-0.23
\

0.81
0.04
*
X v v v ^ "•
- - Y; 'x •'•'
X " %' ~"ป
0.54
. f -s - • -^--- _ *
26MY;; x
'\ ^v'-"' *<"*
ojn
^*s^rr7^^.\^ ^ % viT s>v
-4.37 x
0.92
20.il x
0.38
0.69
-0.35
control limit
control limit

-------
6/20 ESD-LV Performance Evaluation: Uranium-Radium in Water, 12-Jun-1998 1
Uranium (Natural)
Lab
3*4
-^p
QZ
R
RD^
;'ป**;<
RK
RP
RR
RX
RZ
S
SD
vgjpr;
SI
SL
SM
SO
ss
sx
sz
*V;
TD
:'TN:
TQ
TU;
U
UM
C_UP
'J$&
.:tttt
"U55

VA>
VH
VI
W
Res. 1 Res. 2
_ 3.0 	
*s^:'^.0^^^^
__ 	 2.9
'/' ' '• ' i'i,' \ -'• • -"
,_L3A
'"" ~ 'V*',^ -)t x';!^
2.4
2.8
, "- '.;
2.8
2.1
2.8
2.7
-.-.•.ft f.r r '^ , ^ " fjf -V^
3.6
1.5
2.9
3.1
3.1
3.1
2.9

; 	 3.0 _
•v^'-r^V'^,. ;<••,
2.8
- ' - ~ i- //,
3.6
<• - r "
,. ,J,M _,*,,,
< "'•;^-|?^i|&^
'" M. '':'',,'"/ ,-
A lojvvc'-":

-'.'.',-tSt^^
5.3
2.8
3.6
3.2

23 _

2.9
f !' ' "*'
2.7
2.8
,', ;™-"-' '
3.1
2.1
2.6
3.2
f. '' ' •.'ฃ?'''' %*$
3.5
1.4
3.0
2.6
3.2
3.0
2.9

3.0
r " ^ ' ^ •••>-• c^ ^
3.1

3.4
,• -\
2.6
a'"^'<:'-vy.'*i; iv^
ฅ-^H%>X^^
' 'A ;%V
t3U^;>

ซMl^
i.iP"
3.0
3.8
Res. 3
,^ -J?;5 .,
'L'-'f' ^sSt V*^/.
v^ •" ^ ^ / ^'
rt Q
'--v,-f'; svt;"-
3.0

2.7
2.9
^ /*
4.0
2.5
2.6
3.6
_r =*:"".• --.{
3.6
1.4
3.1
2.8
2.9
2.7
2.7
•• ^ •.
2.9
2^'y-y'*
3.1

3.5
r ,""- -': '
2.3
^V3:y.wS\*;SOS'Kf&'3ฃ/
$v $ <^-i;-f-f'lK^\
;^v;;.^;
-^4^1:-

$3 ^•^'^•cV*'^'1
— ^^,
3.0
3.7
Exper.
Sigma
0.12
^^fKT--
0.00
-",'".-
0.15
v s •• ,
0.17
0.06

0.62
0.23
0.12
0.45

0.06
0.06
0.10
0.25
0.15
0.21
0.12

0.06

0.17

0.10
v- „ : "• • ,
"0.21' _ _
^^^v^'1;,:
"- !\X V / \'
>;'<•"', 2;22

5^ "'"1 fr '."!.''-
6;12
0.12
0.10
Rnganal
(R + SR) Average
0.039
^ -vซ-
0.000

0.059

0.059
0.020

0.236
0.079
0.039
0.177

0.020
0.020
0.039
0.098
0.059
0.079
0.039

0.020

0.059
'
0.039

0.079
<

0.847


0.039
0.039
0.039
3.07
,s >:(\^ " '*• '"^
2.90

3.03

2.60
2.83

3.30
2.23
2.67
3.17

3.57
1.43
3.00
2.83
3.07
2.93
2.83

2.97
i
3.00

3.50

2.53
> , y^y>-

12,18

' •.„*"•>
5.37
2.93
3.70
Normalized deviation
(grand-avg) (known) Tag
-0.05
^ _.-.-^- -,x';?,V
-0.15

-0.07
". -. :• ,~
-0.32
-0.18
\
0.08
-0.53
-0.28
0.01
',-, , ' ; '" '" ''
0.24
-0.99
-0.09
-0.18
-0.05
-0.13
-0.18

-0.11
'-/^ - '"
-0.09
, s - '
0.20

.._^j9Jiง
' ' \ ^ * \ -,' "*"" v ' : : f st^s \

s " O^ JLO

V^X*,':^/- '"
1.28
-0.13
0.32
0.04
j^ ^^f *>?;
-0.06
'>•'
0.02
' -5ป\';'-^ , '-*:,ซ s
-0.23
-0.10
:,' ' * '; '
0.17
-0.44
-0.19
0.10
. .. , „,. , ^ ^, , ^
0.33
-0.90
0.00
-0.10
0.04
-0.04
-0.10
* ,
-0.02
r;T,T\' '; -• -
0.00
- ' " •"'- * ,'
0.29
' V : '' ' *
l-oฃL_ 	
;v:f^^;;\ -x-*Ts;
'"' s :f\' "v'f
6,27 x

L:: k^'- -;-*,
1.37
-0.04
0.40
'ซซjซji'> ,'"v>~v^'f1%'f!xf/r! 'jfCSSJlJ&^^T^'C"'''^^?'^'* ซ•'••'?' " / • • .' . ' ~': ~JV~", 7 '•;"•.""" " f^.;-!;j"-i-!;r--,>^- ">^ ';"•
Wv>
WG
WH
WI
WJ
WO
WR
lA. ฃ. .-.


$&'
* * !',*' '/-'"' "s"<v V%,r"
3.2
2.3
3.0
3.4
2.7
3.2
"j ••' s


glf^i
• = No data submitted
0 s
Insufficient data

X s

0.12
0.12
0.06
0.15
0.00
0.20



^ •'-•:,•' 4' -'-;-',-

0.039
0.039
0.020
0.059
0.000
0.079





3.27
2.43
3.03
3.37
2.70
3.00
;.


,.
TAG SYMBOLS
Determined
to be an
outlier

0.07
-0.42
-0.07
0.12
-0.26
-0.09
s ' '\'' ' ",""'' s""


' 'H^::;?^'*^S%
tt s Above
41 s Below
'"•'','"
0.15
-0.33
0.02
0.21
-0.17
0.00
-. •* ,


*'^/r:^^:
control limit
control limit

-------
ESD-LV Performance Evaluation: Uranium-Radium in Water, 12-Jun-1998 7
Uranium (Natural)
Lab Res. 1 Res. 2
X 2.6 3.0

XI 3.0 '/' '3.sT
"XKT; "V .' ";• ",-.',' x'^
XL 2.3 2.4
XM 2.9 3.3
XO \ .;*:\^ :V>3%^: -*>:
^l^gง*^

Exper. Rng anal
Res. 3 Sigma (R + SR)
wJ^__JD.31_ J&jU8_
~v"--r^ ''!>-v ' ' ' - * V '"- • -,
3.2 0.15 o!o59
'S\ v %l ^ .. •, S ^ "" s %
2.4 0.06 0.020
2.8 0.26 0.098
"^?S'^ X;f^"L-J^r\ M< - •
\= * xV. J ' ,, * v ',• ,-"-, ' • NX~ ' ' '*'- '-"-- V

Normalized deviation
Average (grand-avg) (known)
___3i?^.,_™Ml__™:0^9i,,
"" \ฐ" " " v./" 0^ ,* " \^'S? ** "VV'-
3.17 0.01 0.10
v'\ -';ป?" , -' >™V<" " o ' "-'' -' • -;
2.37 -0.45 -0.37
3.00 -0.09 0.00
-!.-"" -"V, ~"^-'''; 'v^fe'l^ ' - ^'s\y.' r ~-V-!
@;S'lงS:i=\f
	 ^
/20
	
Tag

\;vr~
1;-ซ
-'\*'"v!


f*''^
""•s X ^
Data sorted by Laboratory Average
Average Tag
0.17
1.43
2.23
2.23
2.37
2.40
2.43
2.50
2.53
2.60
2.60
2.67
2.70
2.73
2.77
2.77
2.77
2.77
2.77
2.83
2.83
2.83
2.83
2.83
2.87
2.87
2.90
2.90
2.93
• s No data submitted
0 s Insufficient data
Lab Average Tag
FN 2.93
SL 2.93
RZ 2.97
DB 2.97
XL 2.97
QQ 2.97
WH 3.00
CE 3.00
UP 3.00
RK 3.00
N 3.00
S 3.00
WO 3.00
HE 3.00
JE 3.03
EB 3.03
BN 3.03
BC 3.03
AR 3.07
SZ 3.07
SO 3.07
RP 3.07
JK 3.07
AH 3.07
KH 3.10
DO 3.13
E 3.17
QZ 3.17
X 3.17
TAG SYMBOLS
Lab Average Tag
VI 3.17
SX 3.17
DT 3.17
TD 3.20
LF 3.20
CJ 3.23
XM 3.27
WR 3.27
TQ 3.30
SM 3.30
HL 3.33
DE 3.33
CA 3.33
A 3.37
WI 3.40
RD 3.43
JY 3.50
D 3.50
SS 3.50
QU 3.50
NJ 3.50
L 3.57
CS 3.57
AZ 3.60
C 3.60
LZ 3.67
XI 3.70
SD 3.93
JN 4.00
ft s Above control
x = Determined to be an outlier li = Below control
Lab
GQ
BO
BK
FJ
ER
BM
WG
ID
RX
AE
K
HK
AL
WJ
HP
EL
U
I
CX
AK
AJ
SI
AF
GN
BH
Q
W
OB
KT
limit
limit

-------
8/20   ESD-LV Performance Evaluation: Uranium-Radium in Water, 12-Jun-1998
Uranium (Natural)
Average
.Tag.
  Data sorted by Laboratory Average
Lab I  Average	Tag	Lab I  Average	Tag
                              Lab
    4.17
    4.17
    4.20
    4.20
           P
           AW
           QM
           BA
         4.40
         4.60
         4.73
         5.17
         5.37
NH
PW
DZ
MX
VH
10.57
12.13
37.83
48.13
59.47
x
x
X
X
X
PG
UZ
PX
OS
JS
 % responding labs
                     Frequency distribution
 40
 30
 20
 10
     -6
 % responding labs
     -4            -2            0+2           +4
        Normalized deviation of the mean from the known value
                     Frequency distribution
 30
 20
 10



1
1
J
_ T •••
-6 ' -'4 ' -'2 T




1 	
1 .. 	
••I... - - 1

                     Normalized deviation of the mean from the grand average
 • s No data submitted
 0 s Insufficient data
                        TAG SYMBOLS
                 x s Determined to be an outlier
                                           ft s Above control limit
                                           U s Below control limit

-------
        ESD-LV Performance Evaluation: Uranium-Radium in Water,  12-Jun-1998    9/20
Radium-226                         Statistical Summary                      148 Participants
The known value of this nuclide is 4.9 pCi/1 with an expected precision of 0.7; the control limits
are 3.7 to 6.1; the warning regions are 3.7 to 4.1 and 5.7 to 6.1
54(36.5 %) Failed to respond .
7(4.7 %) Outliers	
12(8.1 %) Out of control —
      but not an outlier


        Statistic
                . 69(46.6 %) Within all limits
Respondents
6(4.1 %) In warning zone
       but within control


          Non-outliers
Mean
Std. Dev.
Variance
%Coef. ofVar.
% deviation of mean from known value
Norm. dev. of mean from known value
Median
% deviation of median from known value
Norm. dev. of median from known value
      5.59
      8.04
     64.64
    143.80
     14.10
      0.09
      4.80
     -2.04
     -0.01
 Grand Avg 4.70
             0.70
             0.49
            14.83
            -4.14
            -0.29
             4.80
            -2.04
            -0.14
19(20.2 %) More than 3 norm. S.D. .
6(6.4 %) Between 2 and 3 norm. S.D.*
            ;48(51.1 %) Within 1 norm. S.D.
            J               of known value
     21(22.3 %) Between 1 and 2 norm. S.D.

-------
10/20 ESD-LV Performance Evaluation: Uranium-Radium in Water, 12-Jun-1998
Radium-226
Lab
A
AE
_AFw

AJ
AK
AL
"AP:
:'AB";
?Atf;
AW
AZ
BA
'.BO "
% • v
BQ
BH
BK
BM
BN
BO
C
CA
CC
CE
CJ
CS
cxf
DB
DE
f4*'<'
•>v ,
;DOX
* • '***
*v*j\fr['*
\MfRt,
DT
DZ
E
EB
EL
?ฐ1
ER
>^
5.9
4.9
4.6 	
- ! - XXXX-
- - v . s'\ "-• >, '
V v -. •.* * ^, ^
4.8
5.8
5.9
- go A <, >j
' , •• "• ''V
V ' ' * ^ A ^ '' V" '
4.2
4.9
4.9
4.2
5.0
5.1
4.3

5.2
3.5
4.7
r;^i^>Sfv
5.0
4.9
.- ' ?<->."./,/ % v" ,v^ซr/$
X; cX ~ X|j3f;Jr||f t
;„ ป v,' *•>&ฃ& iiJ!$$* Jv^
„-.- ..'--*.. -^fivSi^M
4.3
5.2
4.3
4.1
4.7
	 J.9_
rr^s!^
^/fS^'^P^lS
!! f ^-' ''^'"^^-t"" - 1
5.1~
4.6
4.7
4.6
4.8
?**'jx''^sr!3j''&VA'' #o** '
"sj"S*l *• " '"•. ..
""^'Kfv , ,,,
4"'.5 	
4.6
4.8 __
r'-'~"^'''*-,-'
„-:-
'Sfc2:M .
5.1
5.4
5.0
3&6' ^w.r
% •• ••'•,.'•,
\ C" ^. ' ;-"v v
5.1
4.8
5.1
4.7
5.2
4.9
5.0
>"'
4.5
4.8
5.5
V*-hซw ^^^^-.^
4.9
4.9 ^^
•vS^^^^^ ^^^^
v^cw^p^&^p


sJwS-^;
ซfwซ^j;
4.8
5.5
4.5
4.1
4.9
4.7
•AW. V. ,f,-^.VJV.^ff.^f,-.-. •.
}••ซ!•* % X-.^g-J ซ11'
j5^!!..
^^^SiJ
^^I'y-^S
6.1
5.1
4.7
4.6
^4.9^ ^
^C^Z
5.2
4.9
5.0

^
2.1
5.4
4.8
5.4
S3.8


5.1
4.9
5.0
4.5
4.6
4.8
4.7

4.6
5.1
4.7
S|ฃ
4.8 "
5.0
srs^^jjH^
*l,^f^
^Si?lฃฎl

^^^3^S^ ^

""Sir %
5.7
4.6
4.2
4.6
4.8
4.9
•l\'
--VT-. s - --
5.6
5.2
• s No data submitted
0 •
Insufficient data

X S
Exper.
Sigma
0.06
0.12
0.06

0.70
0.17
0.20


0.06
0.30
0.50
0.45
1.51


0.52
0.06
0.10
0.25
0.31
0.15
0.35

0.38
0.85
0.46
v^v^i'.X v !-"
0.10
0.06
s'1|" I""'!" -"- !
\^f/^^'' " '
•y?.~ ' "% ,- „ -

&L* •. ' ^

0.40
0.25
0.15
0.06
0.15
0.10
0.29


0.50
0.32
Rnganal
(R + SR) Average
0.084
0.169
0.084

1.345
0.253
0.338


0.084
0.506
0.844
0.759
3.756


0.759
0.084
0.169
0.422
0.506
0.253
0.591

0.591
1.667
0.675
^ 'S
0.169
0.084
-.V •-





0.675
0.422
0.253
0.084
0.253
0.169
0.422


0.844
0.506
4.67
4.53
4.83x
?' ,
5.20
4.80
4.80


: 2.13
5.10
5.33
5.43
82.10


4.80
4.87
5.00
4.47
4.93
4.93
4.67

4.77
4.47
4.97
Xx'X:'":x,, v
4.90
4.93
f <• ff. v t ^ > A ^ •.
* J
\-' " ;' * - ;" l ^

'' •• z •"
^ '"'"'' f * ^ -.It ' 1 '' '
4.73
5.47
4.47
4.13
4.73
4.80
5.07
* •-

5.60
4.97
TAG SYMBOLS
Determined
to be an
outlier
Normalized deviation
(grand-avg) (known) Tag
-0.07
-0.40
_?.34_ w
' *„' "' ' '. '' \ w'.
1.24
0.26
0.26
' ' • , ' ' ' ''• ''
• -. , - . - , - -> ' > •
X0J4/X"
1.00
1.57
1.82
1&L52 3
••
, ' * •
0.26
0.42
0.75
-0.57
0.58
0.58
-0.07

0.17
-0.57
0.67
;;;/;^^:
0.50
0.58
;\; ^ A ;; **" \ ^r;,?
'-'^vf/S^ ^("^':
" \ ^\\^-^^ „> j ** --^,v\
f t ••' "" " '^'''"'A*''^^.''*^
* / \ ' ' ; f\'f''p'v "i
' •• X" , "" v '•X'xx^x.vX-J!-T?A
0.09
1.90
-0.57
-1.39
0.09
0.26
9-?vJI"
: ' .: " c'ง!
- ','"*'* r
2.23
0.67
tt s Above
U s Below
-0.58
-0.91
^-0.16^ ____
7^^!;-vSJ
0.74
-0.25
-0.25
"""'Tf ..X
" r . -o-' *
-6i$8,4^ x\\;
0.49
1.07
1.32
aldix/^V,
X* ' ^i v-v-. S f. V' ,-. ~~
x%*"U^? - -"'••*" ;
-0.25
-0.08
0.25
-1.07
0.08
0.08
-0.58
*
-0.33
-1.07
0.16
^jWSj^J.
0.00
0.08
&'", "'---r.:' • ™ L.'" "
'V-, ':L-;X X-----^"
SV V ''"-"'> ^~*,^ ฐ"
•"•^'^'Ol v'^, ''%, ^ ^ ^ '^^^^ -V
^^""V^^V^ -. X ;X^ ^ "" "-V / \
-0.41
1.40
-1.07
-1.90
-0.41
#?w~^7*r
I^C^
^Sv^-T^K
v '"',>>•-• ' '-v '*-,ซ'
1.73
0.16
control limit
control limit

-------

	 1
ESD-LV Performance Evaluation: Uranium-Radium in Water, 12-Jun-1998 11/20
Radium-226
Lab
GQ
HE
HK
HL
HP
I
JDD_
JE
? jfc!"\
" ' firr"
;'jN~'
JS
JX
JY
K
KH
KL
KT
L
'•'•fjjP "
LH
LZ
M
MF
MX
N
,NA
NH
NJ
NK
NO
O
OB
OS
ox
p
,_
5.4
,"" 7;\^;':"^?
;-V*^,ฃr^t*<-
•::^S1
4.9 ~
5.0
•-• -!-8.6'";:
5.7
4.9
6.5
4.4
„ _„ , V^V^^^H,
\ * o
5.2
3.7
3.4
3.8
5.0
_
4.5
ji.4
, 5 "^ ' " * SW>X
' ^V:Xj
5.2
'r^^^ijjjjji
-\^ ^s ^ v^?^
5.2 "*
4.3
-rซ-*"^^x"" ""^T^^Tx
" ^^TTW?^
3.0
5.6
3.3
^V^^fr^S
6.3
Res. 2
3.5
4.0
4.7
5.3
4.8
4.2
4.8
-p-< — ^.WA-. xi* C?1 W^*W
5.2
-^i^iSvJ?!^
^r^jrT't'V* ';
$$!^\&V&ฃ
S ซ *^" - t •• "^ -.'• " ••
-0\ , ^! x,^ ^ r^s1- ;.?
"4.6
5.2
.,' :-A\?;9 - -*'
4.8
4.4
	 5.4 	
4.0
Nry"-1f^ ^
,::^'3^?i
5.2
4.4
2.7
3.1
4.9

4.8
__. .M 	 ,
^ w*^-. <• ,^( ^ ^
- ,;^ ?^M
5.2
gง^p;f?|

5".!^^
4.9

^fxlM^?
^2.2
5.2
3.3
s?^%5^
5.6
Res. 3
3.6
4.2
4.9
4.5
5.2
4.7
4.7
5.4
"> V\\ ?s"x?'x' ' ;
11 ;--*•-' o :
^%: v -
4.3
4.6
' -6.4,
4.5
4.6
5.6
3.9
";,?":-"• ', r
•'-•*'.-,' -
5.3
3.0
2.7
3.6
5.0

4.7
_3.2m_
^™^.^-* x^r \^ \*"
\ฐ V -
4.7
^7?^;
}s^'\l^x, ปซปS\V
"""' 5.2"'
4.9
^งIS|Sp;
^I^Jg-^
3.8
5.4
3.5
'-*• A"1;:"!
4.9
No data submitted
Insufficient
data
xs
Exper.
Sigma
0.21
0.15
0.12
0.46
0.26
0.32
0.44
0.12
-" N , (

^ ,-'" * '•'-•
0.30
0.31
0.90
0.62
0.25
0.59
0.26


0.06
0.70
0.40
0.36
0.06

0.15
0.62

N
0.29

v;:};^/-
0.06
0.35
^Ajr^;^;-
^;^b.ii'v%
0.80
0.20
0.12
v
0.70
Rng anal Normalized deviation
(R + SR) Average (grand-avg) (known) Tag
0.338
0.253
0.169
0.675
0.422
0.506
0.675
0.169
;;sy,

"•'':;V v,
6.506
0.506
1.667
1.024
0.422
0.928
0.422


0.084
1.345
0.591
0.591
0.084

0.253
1.024


0.422

o%
0.084
0.506
/--^x,r
0,169
1.667
0.338
0.169

1.345
3.67
4.17
4.83
4.77
5.10
4.33
___ 5;0ฃ__,
5.33
':,-' ,->>'" -;!-" >-," ''-' ->
',^' '- *"\Oi:> X
r ''^y':^'^''.
4.60
4.93
7.43 :
5.00
4.63
5.83
4.10
-'.-"*' s';^ )^V''S-'-
.."> ::/i4::-::-!
5.23
3.70
2.93
3.50
4.97
-
4.67
3.70__
"" -r"-~;~ -~-ซปซ-.^

_5.qa 	
•„ V,",^-*- ฐ~
- -"": ; -',:;-"; V^;;?- ฐ
^ " ' 5.17 	
4.70
5V^^^^-^H
'\. -.r^'lLl^T1*1:
3.00
5.40
3.37
' -%> \ - '•> :^ "*!\-*^ ;;
5.60
TAG SYMBOLS
Determined
to be an
outlier
-2.55
-1.31
0.34
0.17
1.00
-0.90
_^75__
1.57
^~!S>"~;:7\,TV
•',^,V,-r'' •*-'*;
'^XfeK^--
-6.24
0.58
: 6.77'' ; N* '
0.75
-0.16
2.81

-1.48
s ^ ^. \^^ •• ^ •• N v N1^1
x ';' v f N
1.33
-2.47
-4.36
-2.96
0.67

-0.07
-2.47

• \--V- ' ;' \
0.83
" v^iV^
^Mr^
1.16
0.01
srS^pl^"7^"
l^t-SS/^^
-4.20
1.74
-3;29
^S^>; ~-;'
2.23
tt = Above
-3.05 Jl
-1.81
-0.16
-0.33
0.49
-1.40
1.07
•. •. V S -VV ^ 5% v%v
/'^ซ--,~- \x"-V*'*-
>_ '-V>:-- '/ซ:'
-0.74
0.08
'6.27 --,x\
0.25
-0.66
2.31
, . -,^ - ' •—
-1.98
-~r'; ^'T1 :"^'-~
U''>:>. ••
0.82
-2.97
-4.87 U
-3.46 II
0.16
*
-0.58
-2.97
"\"~". :-.>'"
'. : ,\ป-
0.33
-- * - ''% ^ '- * ' -
^l;;,;r :-*',:
0.66
m-0.49^ _
T^VTT'-^' s\,*ic x'
^7:84;: %v
-4~70 li
1.24
-3.79 II
;"' \V-T\-*,
1.73
control limit
•II = Below control limit

-------
r
^_
/—





























•'
12/20
ESD-LV Performance Evaluation: Uranium-Radium in Water,
Radium-226
Lab Res. 1
QU
lilt" '
**ซ*
QZ
R
(tii ••'-
*M*'.. .-
s ;. ft f-sty <, •• "•

RK
ซW"-'"'
v^y*1*
SUBt'^r ;>
RZ
SO
^flw?^* -
SI


SM
80 v
ss
sx
sz_
TD
TN
TQ
W

'llSf*
UP
UQ
" .. /v,*
'<•_._, 4
,uz
VA
VI
W
we
"*•> '•A^'J^i—i
WH
v •5;.-. v s\
WJ
wo

IP* %fttafc ,
I ^ .ITS*
]L>%*j#ฃ|^
2.9
" ' V ,
Res. 2
_3.0^?
4% '."'iJ~::-,-,'* -<• >'
5.2 5.5
4.7 4.4
"- '"'# t *
•''••' H.V'*v<" "~'~'\
' , ' V.-%' ", ...... **
3.7
' * •> ' ' j *j
f,*-&4;fc;%^|i
f.+ 'v  ^
/ ^' v ^Ji^ir -1
6.2
5.1
3.5
,~ V* ''• • ' '
4.5


5.4
4.8
4.3
4.5
3.2
4.8
5.3
4.4

\
4.9
4.9
6.7
4.1
4.9
3.7
i;>'^:> 7 '^•'V^H- V^!'x
4.7
> w*, -r'"1^"
4.9
6.1

> * ' v^V^ {**''
f,ss" \. ^'^x.^'
-. V-.^ •- .. ^
lf-K™T!!ir' * v' '•*'•' ', -


I f •>*• TV mmi*
fr.
' *• "• 'v? -. '••'•

'~-";T;'l'''a~"">";-
-i ^5^*? i''l4" '
V '•ฃป'"'.•* ^;;.o ' / ""^/^^
4.8 J^
;'•'•; ," C"™'--'v">'"
,i'งfi^>%?^fe
^V-^f;-V'')f^;
6.3
5.1
3.7
?"' %" >\ ' '; i"\
4.2


, A-T
5.1
4.1
3.7
3.6
3.8
5.1
4.3
•- •' ', ft ?*- ^ ****ซv
••v^// ^s ' •>
5.0
4.9
6.2
4.3
4.4
4.1^
i"^*;p^$ฃ ^ijii^ffi&ifc
5.0
s *" ",^%' •. •• ^?'% *
iv~5.o"
5.7

?v "X^i *>^ ^^^?v<-Xซ<'
-v}f;f?^r f $&&$*ป
t^***-*.* tv****.^-*.- 'Wvj
'- A> '•>?-;- f •••> y >W %
•* f •*; v*--**. ~--\%
"- • vs--,^,-n-x-^

No data submitted
Insufficient data
•-
Res. 3
3.1
'w.' " * ' * " ^
4.8
4.5
^%v v ^A^ ^ < -%
' '^* 'f^j-~>'^> *"• ' V ^ ' '**
% •• yff^!?; ^f^^*?' ,
^,4;4,^
jytf* ^^^""^
s,j,''?' i Vs "^ •. ''•?&,'ฃ -frd'^
f- ' : { i" <, t f <&
f'^^ ^ •'•*•' -" ฐ.j ^ "•
6.4
5.1
4.1
-', ;-'
4-4


5;4
4.5
4.5
3.6
3.5
5.1
4.6
4.5

' •. * ^^ " >4v'''Vvl ^ '%
5.1
5.1
' ^ "• ^"^ "•
6.1
3.8
4.5
.,., ,3;^-
^^ ai! 'j Cffi^/j$&iiy>!?
^ v v,^^
S A SJ J
^f ^
4.6
	 6.7_

vVw"^*, f * "^. ^^x"
"V t-/$$^ ^.^^>\
^''vi"?-?>'<|t^ >}.•;> v;y •?
;2V\^ ;v"-. 'ปc;
$^l'ซ, ,ป "
X s
Exper. Rng anal
Sigma (R + SR)
0.10 0.169

0.35 0.591
0.15 0.253
70.40; 0,675
/'** "-, " ' " ""- , *" - }
-."•/.• .• .. ^ ' ^ __.- v J:%
0.56 0.928
v * ",'•!' , ' ,/
" *"-:.•••- r >*f '• '•;•*: '' )• ^ ' '^V'.
" "*tit*t&- ' - 1 -HAK '
0.10 0.169
0.00 0.000
0.31 0.506

0.15 0.253


0.00 0.000
0.30 0.506
0.20 0.338
0.49 0.759
0.21 0.338
0.68 1.185
0.36 0.591
0.10 0.169

ฃvy ' ''•''• '
0.10 0.169
0.12 0.169
0.32 0.506
0;71 1.346
0.25 0.422
0.26 0.422
0.56 0.928
'.'^Xv %'" J '"-•••• ^ " '-. ''*" '''"'^
0.17 0.253

0.21 0.338
0.50 0.844

"*^\ \ i ? " * s
'&••'?• ,,"''•'' ' "••••"••
' ^ %\*^ *f v < ' , ' i
\A -',''"'' !
'-' y !<"•' -.
TAG SYMBOLS
Determined to be an
•
1
12-Jun-1998 J
Normalized deviation
Average (grand-avg) (known) Tag
3.00
'', ••'' /"' ,
5.17
4.53
., .• f ^ ''•''<> V ,
- ,8,73,;
^'-•'- '*••* ."^'A*'/^-'
* j v ""* >- " * v1- % ^ ^,, J '
4.30
'" •- ', ' f~ '' , ",
•^-'';. ''/;^\^^
';•• '' ป*ป;'. ", ";
6.30
5.10
3.77
• ^ '
4.37
.. "" --^ " "" •. ^


5.40
4.80
4.30
3.93
3.43
4.57
5.00
4.40


5.00
4.97
6.33
7.13
4.07
4.60
3.60
-. ' " •!• " " ']i ''''' ^ *' \ ^; '''"1"1
4.80

4.83
6.17

J * ' ' '? -. " ' '••
"• Z* "• •,•••• \ f *" '**' "• *
'' j '' T '••


outlier
•—
-4.20 _-4."0, .,*-_
"^,y *„>.•.•;-/'' '"'• "'5fV- V'*' ' "* - *

lll6 6.66
-0.40 ,,v,:9-91
'„ 9^9^ ;ivj^sj 0;4^;\ ^ ^
*' "' ' v V^^ V'^ ป<^X '"-'"V't* ~ i'/ V
s ^ .v /^V-""'V^w-^o '*! .>>" ^"^-N^ ^s '. ***.-'
.0.98 >:1.48 	
-,,-jC' 5--v-;C^il;J<, ~-', s:,\,,,x
t !l-"^f r^';^ ' *„
0.26 -0.25
-0.98 -1.48
-1.89 -2.39
:,- '1 , -,s ^ .,..;- "•:>; • •"-",
-3.13 -3.63 H
-0.32 -0.82
0.75 0.25
^i,,,.,p %^, - ;,...,:,? "--_y, ^ -•
-0.73 -1.24

11 ' A
0.75 0.25
0.67 0.16
'*"'"-.'', •-. - • ' ' • ซ
4.05 3.55 tt
. 6,03: ;T'\;.>''ซWSS" x
-1.56 -2.06
-0.24 -0.74
-2.71 ,v^ / "v^y^^ ^' ^ ' "•
0.26 -0.25
•• ..';.,'•__,. ' J j ' " ^
""' ^ " V"" / V - ' (V •• ^
0.34 -0.16
3.64 ^J?;1.?..^ A

'''('-1 - \v.- ^V^^*/^'^^ tNt
",x'';''"14i' " c-,ฃ' -,-'''"-' ' ' *
^ ' >' i 'C' *
--- : ,-:- \ "••,"',- > •'

1T s Above control limit
Ji = Below control limit
~





































=^

-------
ESD-LV Performance Evaluation: Uranium-Radium in Water, 12-Jun-1998 13
Radium-226
Lab Res. 1 Res. 2
JfL^, — ^j*-7 4-4
"•"XAx^"*- ^r^r^T-^spri^s^;
-jฃ0;;V '- ^*^j$^$^^^\
^xnB>- v V* v-I^vt^l^^^
' v * ^ 5/, * \,Vs ,s X V
XI 2.9 3.4
XL 5.0 5.1
XM 5.9 5.6
XO\ x ,, : N'\ / '/
m ^VV'v'*
? rv^'vr- '

Exper. Rng anal
Res. 3 Sigma (R + SR)
^^._4:L ., A2L. - . ฐ:3?.8- ป'
"^^r;>o^'""':r" "" "s1";-..-^" 	 ! "• '
If^X^T^- v'-'-^'-V -''':• /*
'^^^^tt^'X'1':- ' '--1;"1-1 ''-''-
^ \ " ^ XVX "\ X"
2.8 0.32 0.506
5.1 0.06 0.084
5.6 0.17 0.253
V N -

.. -~ -

Normalized deviation
Average (grand-avg) (known)
__4.47 	 ^-0.57 _il.07_
VT* ™i A^^T***^^ "^ ^ •-v'''" ^^^ ^^^^^>ซ.^ซ'. %;>^" ww>* - w* •
r^' /^ v^^'^s-^l^.^k.1 -!/ฅN
1 - '^^:- ; ': ~ ^X^VT:"^*;-.-"^:?;
< -'••.'• ^*" s " ''""^ \x'
3.03 ;4.12 -4.62
5.07 0.91 0.41
5.70 2.48 1.98

*
s \ \v
" " " ^
/20

Tag

\?Jฃ ,,|s
\- ^'^
,y v- ;
" ' ' ""'
;•!.;

'•*
*
I
Data sorted by Laboratory Average
Average Tag
1.73 x
2.13 x
2.93 U
3.00 Ji
3.00 li
3.03 U
3.37 U
3.43 . 11
3.50 JJ
3.60 U
3.67 U
3.70
3.70
3.77
3.93
4.07
4.10
4.13
4.17
4.30
4.30
4.33
4.37
4.40
4.47
4.47
4.47
4.47
4.53
• s No data submitted
0 s Insufficient data
Lab Average Tag
PG 4.53
AU 4.57
MF 4.60
QU 4.60
PW 4.63
XI 4.67
Q 4.67
TD 4.67
MX 4.70
WC 4.73
GQ 4.73
NJ 4.77
M 4.77
SD 4.80
SZ 4.80
VI 4.80
L 4.80
EB 4.80
HE 4.80
SX 4.83
RK 4.83
I 4.83
SI 4.87
U 4.90
X 4.93
E 4.93
CJ 4.93
BN 4.93
R 4.97
TAG SYMBOLS
Lab Average Tag
AE 4.97
TN 4.97
W 4.97
JS 5.00
KH 5.00
NH 5.00
CA 5.00
A 5.00
P 5.03
EL 5.07
DT 5.07
HL 5.10
CE 5.10
WH 5.10
BH 5.17
SS 5.17
EO 5.20
AL 5.23
AK 5.33
WJ 5.33
HK 5.40
AF 5.40
BK 5.43
DB 547
JX 5.60
DE 5.60
C 5.70
BO 5.83
UQ 6.17 IT
It = Above control
x = Determined to be an outlier & = Below control
Lab
N
GN
CS
UP
TQ
K
ID
BM
O
XL
ER
S
HP
AW
QZ
OX
AJ
LZ
JE
AZ
SM
PX
BA
DZ
FN
QQ
XM
KL
WO
limit
limit

-------
14/20  ESD-LV Performance Evaluation: Uranium-Radium in Water, 12-Jun-1998
Radium-226
Average
Tag
  Data sorted by Laboratory Average
Lab |  Average       Tag        Lab  Average
                                        Tag
                                      Lab
   6.30
   6.33
 IT
 IT
RZ
VA
7.13
7.43
x
x
VH
JY
 7.67
 8.73
82.10
x
x
X
RX
RD
BC
 % responding labs
                    Frequency distribution
 10
                   ••••• •
     -6
    -4-20            +2            +4
       Normalized deviation of the mean from the known value
 % responding labs
                    Frequency distribution
 10
                         	•  —1 •••••
     -6
    -4           -2           0            +2+4
      Normalized deviation of the mean from the grand average
 • = No data submitted
 0 = Insufficient data
                       TAG SYMBOLS
                x s Determined to be an outlier
                                           ft s Above control limit
                                           II = Below control limit

-------
        ESD-LV Performance Evaluation: Uranium-Radium in Water, 12-Jun-1998  15 720
Radium-228                         Statistical Summary                      148 Participants
The known value of this nuclide is 2.1 pCi/1 with an expected precision of 0.5; the control limits
are 1.2 to 3.0; the warning regions are 1.2 to 1.5 and 2.7 to 3.0
65(43.9 %) Failed to respond •
5(3.4 %) Outliers	
21 (14.2 %) Out of control --
       but not an outlier


         Statistic
                . 45(30.4 %) Within all limits
Respondents
• 12(8.1 %) In warning zone
          but within control


            Non-outliers
Mean
Std. Dev.
Variance
% Coef. of Var.
% deviation of mean from known value
Norm. dev. of mean from known value
Median
% deviation of median from known value
Norm. dev. of median from known value
      2.93
      1.57
      2.46
     53.53
     39.47
      0.53
      2.60
     23.81
      0.32
    Grand Avg 2.62
               0.64
               0.41
              24.32
              24.70
               0.81
               2.55
              21.43
               0.71
27(32.5 %) Mora than 3 norm. S.D. •
11 (13.3 %) Between 2 and 3 norm. S.D.
           . 18(21.7 %) Within 1 norm. S.D.
                           of known value
     27(32.5 %) Between 1 and 2 norm. S.D.

-------
16/20 ESD-LV Performance Evaluation: Uranium-Radium
Radium-228
Lab
A
AE
_AF
•"AUt ,
AJ
AK
AL
~'kt%>.'
l$"?f:
""AUt'v
" Attr-'
s AU; •>,
AW
AZ
BA
BC
BO
BH
BK
BM
BPf'
BO
C
CA
"cc.
CE
CJ
CS
vCSt'c
Z&.\
DB
DE
.titf*
DO
;-;DB>
DT
DZ
E
EB
EL
EO
H
"•"mum1-
\'ซuB *
-\lljt*
'•jW'wF/
FN
GN
• =
0 •
Res. 1
2.7
1.7
2.5
i- >, ',-v,*;,~>
2.2
2.9
2.8
™, t/'/V \\ซ: *A;x.V..
'*.';* 'i*-'*" '•,•?>'<•
Aป,1.''?i-,,ป7\/-<
\ '' ' '*,v' '' * ' ' *'
' '"*-- *s>, %}K ."
2.9
2.1
3.9
	 2.4
:* , "" ;;"'.
2.8
1.9
	 2.4
C - ", s; .. '1 ,
2.5
2.4
2.6
'' "-'"I'.'- ,:"<
3.4
2.1
2.9
'';v,,,,;;;\:
1-v^r'iV"
1.8
2.2
r"i>~;v7"
't-S^'VN'
" , ,'v;\.. x,.;;'s;;-;
3.4
3.2
2.8
2.6
3.1
^ J2.1
;K^lt^
•V'.V-i'>'
' •* ," ''"-'^X^,^-,
/ SvX^'J'^'
" V'11* •-.•*'• •. ••'
3.1
4.2
Res. 2
3.0
1.8
2.5
^•':~ iVl, 4-^"',
3.7
2.4
2.2
•^^l^^gppf5"
'* *ฃ*x*'y A;
^''v ^-^'^!1^; '> '
Vba^jfafy' ~-'->-fVf^V:f'"~y
3.0
1.6
3.6
r^,s,x^7^v
^ , -~''A ,- ' .- .~^'" ' •"'f V '.'
2.1
2.1
2.J_^ ^
;/>??3> r^'V-^'V*'1"
	 "2.8~
2.4
3.3
^/iฃv*~ v}v;^
3.4
1.7
2.5
^;ip|^;^>
^^^S2S^
	 1.9 * 	
2.4
7,4^ ''v^^ssfj^r ;


3.6
2.8
2.7
3.0
2.3
	 2.2 _

^V^^^^g)- <$•$$$*
\-^s^ >!">5& "^fe" r^^ V
\\'#i$*$)$%'ฃ*- ''f'V'

2.5
4.6
Res. 3
2.4
2.1
2.4
/ ;„' X."C,
2.0
2.5
2.4
S V* si"
* V s
•''A'J*^''- % ''
'' , . *"%V '
'* ' ", * - " f-
3.3
2.2
3.9
2.9
'•• -1'', 'y
2^3
2.1
^ JL2^

2.1
2.6
„,, ,A-9,
< >- 'V\ /--
2.9
2.0
2.6
WfxR
Si:^,;
1.7
2.6
*P^I'

y^^fe^'f*''^
^K^f/SปJr/ป4i;
2.9
2.9
2.6
3.2
1.8
2.2
'>^;sVf *
<'' s " * "" 'j
2.7
4.5
No data submitted
Insufficient data
X s
Exper.
Rnganal
in Water, 12-Jun-1998
Normalized deviation
Sigma (R + SR) Average
0.30
0.21
0.06

0.93
0.26
0.31


"•"'
""•,"• ff j
•.'. ^ --^ -, t ^
0.21
0.32
0.17
0.25

0.36
0.12
0.25

0.35
0.12
0.70
'-' i'\--. • i
0.29
0.21
0.21
^W:^>V'" ;
;x-;s:i- , '<(• ••
0.10
0.20
S'^-'-. *''
y&:~ • • '
,ۥ'" /
0.36
0.21
0.10
0.31
0.66
0.06
;;"^;:\^". -.
','"/ •'' '
>'*v ,;*>_• ; - - '
'',--:"''' ,- '
, <
0.31
0.21
0.709
0.473
0.118

2.921
0.591
0.709
"" , '' J >x ^ """ "

' * * u


0.473
0.709
0.354
0.591

0.827
0.236
0.591
, _.
0.827
0.236
2.245
'
0.591
0.473
0.473
j

0.236
0.473



0.827
0.473
0.236
0.709
2.020
0.118





0.709 -
0.473
2.70
1.87
2.47

2.63
2.60
2.47
•• •• ^^*w



^
3.07
1.97
3.80
2.67
y
2.40
2.03
2.43

2.47
2.47
2.60

3.23
1.93
2.67
"'ป;\",\

1.80
2.40

sXi,
- ;. " ',
3.30
2.97
2.70
2.93
2.40
2.17
' XX~v

_\ "


2.77
4.43
TAG SYMBOLS
s Determined
to be an outlier

(grand-avg) (known) Tag
0.28
-2.61
-0.53
, -'- 't \'ซ^*,
0.05
-0.07
-0.53
•:"-•ซ• S"A ff.-. f,t V. f ^ ^AS V.S
, '•t. , •{•% X *• ' "• \ "•
T; \ '' -"- -. **
,™ , *},C'- , "' v';/'. '; -
; , ^; .\* , - - - >%,v
' •• " * '?'''''•• '
1.55
-2.26
4.09
0.17
,; , ^ ^ ,. ,-f-;.
-0.76
-2.03
-0.64
x-s
-0.53
-0.53
-0.07
^ "" ••'
2.13
-2.37
0.17
'V'Af-'^'X'^r
*v, ;-,'\", ''-/V'"
	 12.84 	
-0.76
11 s -, •• * S ^ ,1 '
S ^ X •• V J ••'
., "• ' ^ "" \~'j , ^ <\V -.••"
-"'-' '- ^v*>>/ '.74
.2.36
1.21
0.28
1.09
-0.76
-1.57
"!• *. X1 ' ' '/• •• < ~-f. J '•'•'^l
^ •. •• •. \-' '• '• \ ^
\" \" ^, -.A-.^"'^?^
s' t """ ' "X. " .,'; '$-*x-,' ^
^ *"" * ซ ' *J^
0.51
6.29
tt s Above
Ji ^ Below
2.08
-0.81
_1.27
';V-";i - , '•-'
"l.85
1.73
1.27
ซ ซ ,-. ^y-AVVS ^ s•.VA^V.,sAv
'\ '^^"^^^ s's"" "'' "\"
", •••• ^^1' ^ '\\ ••:'', + ^*
•X ** % toA - ' :
^', '* " - * s
3.35 ft
-0.46
5.89 IT
_1.8H5^_ 	
,v 1,'v -*'':-
1.04
-0.23
1.15
4 '** >>>-
1.27
1.27
1.73
>7;,:>-\-ซ :
3.93 IT
-0.58
1.96
?"\-, }V--'*'V-
v"> ;/>- ••"',;/
-1.04
1.04
"" ;,?r"/:'ป' J
\ '7 /#"'/;,•
"" ** "" > ' •• , M
4.16 IT 	
3.00
2.08
2.89
1.04
_0.23_
^ ^ S /j '^ -^v * s
\T\ ^.Vv' :
•'' 'V- "•>, "•• ' ,"-"•
7""7 4 -"--'>' "- '^, ,^
, f •f •ฃ •, "•
2.31
8.08 IT
control limit
control limit

-------
        ESD-LV Performance Evaluation: Uranium-Radium in Water,  12-Jun-1998  17/20
Radium-228
Lab
       Res. 1
                    Exper.   Rng anal            Normalized deviation
Res. 2     Res. 3     Sigma   (R + SR)   Average  (grand-avg)  (known) Tag
                                                                                      tr
                                      0.55
                                      0.20
                                      0.00
                                      0.06
                                      0.80
                                      0.20
                                      0.81
                              1.570
                              0.473
                              0.000
                              0.118
                              2.695
                              0.473
                              2.695
                                      0.25
                                      0.68
                                      0.10
                                      1.06
                              0.591
                              2.020
                              0.236
                              3.821
 • = No data submitted
0 = Insufficient data
                    TAG SYMBOLS
             x s Determined to be an outlier
                                                                    ft s Above control limit
                                                                    •I! ^ Below control limit

-------
18/20 ESD-LV Performance Evaluation: Uranium-Radium in Water, 12-Jun-1998
Radium-228
Lab
JE,,
Q?
:*ป , *
RD
'iiVi" ^
-• O'V*1
i-HiC1
~"RP"'
•RR7
RX
RZ
S
sir
SF
SI
08L":-
SM
SO
ss
Isat?
' BZv
-j. f" t'~.
,~ ,T ' ', ."
TD
TN
TQ
TU
U
UM
UP
UQ

\m:
-tJZt
VA
'VBf'
VI
w
we
:i;V$i

WH
;wr
'-'W If
v V wT V y-'
WO
WR

iBtr^t *
1 ^<"
^WXr'-
• =
0 5
Res. 1 Res. 2
m;"*', '.. -'>-' '
2.4
, j'-'"" " ->"* - ' *• ' -, -'
•','",;' ' ",; ? \ v ,; ^ ^ ;"„ •
' ^ > '/ ' l;l.'6x$*^'v •'
>=' *% * - ^X-'^r'^ **'
-V:''^;'P^ >{f
1.8
2.5
2.3
' /'" ' 6*2 - "' . :
..' "' " "., •,.<•
2.4
,;. „'•"•,-' -\.v '}l'r ~" ~~*
4.3
! , ">-,'• - ,,
	 3.0 	
**. f '• ^* *'* ฃt :.fc ''W^v"- <. v X"% -.
*"•- v ^Jซ-O
r'T^Oii''1^"'*"'
"'>,>/ ' •: • -,;, f>i\** -
,'''', „•' ' ,\ S
3.0
3.5
2.0
' t " '*> 5
	 1.8 ^ _ _
- , „''-,,;<• ;- ,-
2.6
2.0

•••:•.:' •• --; '
'. v /--:!'"r>;;Lx=
2.8
'-"••"-'.•agjiS^is
2.3"""™'""
3.5
2.8
v't'sY^ ^-^M^' h*j&:&/-.
?-*-.-• ^ r ^y^-*1- t ^ j, &. >
2.0
3.2^
I-i.",' >w>;
2.2
l,<\ ^~
3.0
v '
,C* '-
[^0?
'1^
4^~-{
1.9
2.5
2.0
,4,5^

1.9

4.3_

3.0
!6j|?
^.'^
"-' '"* -
> -:-, ''
0.4
2.7
2.2
; '^
2.0

2.1
2.5
""s^** •ft) '

\J:'*'- f 'J ~"
3.1
lij&Ms
*3.7%
2.7
3.7
^g;^|\
11 , ;^ / *
2.1
**", V \ ™^
' s "- "'J^ , - 1$,
s\-"% •• s /," ' '
2.1
2.8

• v ' * > J^ ," "x
\ ' *,'j*\-\','* ; ^~ ff'
"•,,--- j:\si - '-*^s?-, ;,,>
:"

2.4
3.0
fu.

-"?

Res. 3
_ซ^ป^ 2.6_
	 (,_J;9_
^' <• } •>*••$" V* s ,' A,*A
2.3
'-"-.,,V4'v ' ', '
"i-/'ฃv'r"';'"/ '""
l^J?- 11.0 -\
V?--<\- -;/; •
^ ' -• '*'' , '' '
1.7
2.4
2.0
J'.T" '$'&'

2.2
'•-; "*\ f~ " "l\
4.3
',;":, *>":• ;>."ซ.-
2.5
";^'V/;'^'!
*K;r',ft"|^|-,;
',' xป.ซ' "-""••'*',;
'"'.,'*'- ' •
7.4
2.5
1.9
,' ,- '- • -;-'
1.9
" ';"•:- T v
2.4
2.3
•yr -A tff. •. ftf fffAffff y.v^ \
"X •^•^•.'"•^''s 'X*^**^ ^V'"*-

3.3
^iป!v2C'!A.;:iS>ii~"
^I|^4i8iw
3.5
4.2
2.9
^f^^^S^f
*\^ ""t-""^'' ^'fj ^ + *'
3.1
- >
- ,
' ^ ' * ' s
3.1
3.4
*" •• ; f*

;ซ.';•- •'-^'•-,
'' ' '
No data submitted
Insufficient data

X s
Exper.
Sigma
0.31
0.21
<• , '".. * * •
0.38


'v 1.27
s t %•"•

0.10
0.06
0.17
0.51

0.25
' , '
0.00

0.29
; v 0.60
-- \ "-2,52"
•'- "
, ' -
3.54
0.53
0.15
' _ -^
0.10

0.25
0.25

^ •• ^
' '•x'"% v~- " ^
0.45
••} :•,••'• •• '•••,,
*&"?, " A;^7'
0.76
0.75
0.49
'ฃ;'*, ";'ซ<' >"- '' '"
^ ^ i ^ '•
0.61



0.51
0.31



-'
Rnganal
(R + SR) Average
0.709
0.473

0.827
v

4,046


0.236
0.118
0.354
1.345

0.591

0.000

0.591
i.795
10.346


14.846
1.345
0.354

0.236

0.591
0.591



1.120
2.020
2.245
2.470
1.120


1.570



1.345
0.709




,^2.87^
_ 	 _ 2.13
^ , * ' ff>
2.57
Sx " - ..\ ".*

< 12<3ง
"* * "••''' - - ' , <

1.80
2.47
2.10
s 5:07

2.17
*'
4.30
'!-• , "
2.83
' " '' , 5.87"'
10:43
^ -• s *

3.60
2.90
2.03

1.90

2.37
2.27



3.27
' ' '' ' ':~ "5,13
3.17
3.47
3.13
J" ^ - 1 < ^X - ;,
' ^ •> w % v ^
2.40
, - =;


2.53
3.07


,

TAG SYMBOLS
Determined to be an
outlier
Normalized deviation
(grand-avg) (known)
Q.B6^^^
	 ;1.68_
t ' .'• ''
-0.18
x ,s, ;f<~ , >, "• , X ;-",''
, ,- - -'is; / s ;,]- '
,V> :">3S16ง<;--""'":'^
'"':;\™'"; "'"' '*' "M "\
' ' '•.*"'-' "
-2.84
-0.53
-1.80
&.4& ',-••
'• *; •*,-'-
. -1.57
'-" ' ",/",;* '" ^ !rf
5.82
,,„'!•
0.74
^!': J"-;^2fc;?!^
" -' '2lO?' ":":"
[\ , _ ' '-' ' ' ',-,,/'

3.40
0.97
-2.03
- ' * ,,': •-
-2.49
\
-0.87
-1.22

* -
- ^ ,.'--: -\;i
2.24
'Xf;-' x 1^71^10
1.90
2.94
1.78
1 ' -! ,- y'\-v>' x',*'-
,* * ^ -... V •• "\ •-•• "„* /v
-0.76
•- - ' 'v i
' , ^'' '
^ ^ ""••-%
-0.30
1.55
t ' ' ^ "\
%^?
1 ",* :\ • --/,"M'1'
,' 1','-v^'
-1.04
1.27
0.00
10.28.
•V '-
p.23
.'„',. ?-i?L,
7.62
*',vV.'.
_2.54_
1^6^ฐ'>! '
28.8t,
N • ff f
-.<
5.20
2.77
-0.23
?'. \\C
-0.69

0.92
0.58

:": >," - f\.
'",', Vv":
4.04
!i|^5i;!
3.70
4.73
3.58
ซ^^P;>^'
"vi "" "
1.04
";V.


1.50
3.35
* * :f * ; * •.
~* 1

, "}
control
control
Tag
^vr--^

* .,

, ™,,v< , ,,
\ ,> * • ;;>
ฐ ~Xv '
"\ ป ' "
/ ซ-;-



" "x"'r
^ • '

--,- - V"' -
' It
' >X*U,

-:W-;T
?'x\.

, *
rr


;'•'->: _

:•'•: •'



!,. '* -
'''**',
%tf"
i^x"*!
' tf
It
ft
- ^-~ s
;^ V

*'
"-> *


It
•A^--
" '' •

*
limit
limit

-------
ESD-LV Performance Evaluation: Uranium-Radium in Water,
Radium-228
Lab Res. 1 Res. 2
X 2.6 2.5
:*H^ฃf* 	 ^•"^-•^•^-^y, ^C^Vv-vfj'^wttt^v^WKS^
XA x" * " ^ * x ^v'^ ^vt*;\*^^^^t-
' W-rfr '* % ' S'ซ*ซ\V Xv~&NJ WiC^i^ "*" ^^
m\^5i:j^;;P?
XI 4.4 3.1
-JSK, •- - x.,^ -' ;'- jAc-:':^
XL 2.0 2.3
XM _ J-4_.__1J
xo "T ^ •:";l^^^pf^
_XQ>- ;'< f^^^^^?;^
;XR v; ^ , J, ^|";^ --S'-^f^T^f
^^>^ii^fiis

Exper. Rng anal
Res. 3 Sigma (R + SR)
2.5 0.06 0.118
V^^swy^v^ % w^VAWJt* V.-. *<* w. •• A-.^ vw-v, w,-w " v ซ v % %,. %<.™.s<;% sซ
^"'*\V*cV- "^T - "- ^ - s Xl>t>v
S-,' "V\ " 8C^ V^ ^ >• ' \ >o t •- \ S * V -. \ " " ^ ' ^ --1 *
MH^fi;v' ->^': - >;
2.8 0.85 2.695
''-"^V-V ' X -v •- " \-:- '::
2.5 0.25 0.591
^•* . ^ ^ .9:5^ 	 ,1-345
^^X-^r^^T^"^'-"^'*;1 V " "T™ "^'^ '" '' *
JlS^^xift''^^'^-^ "''f'^^-'Ciri
^yr^^^^V -T, ;^^\7' '," - '\'" '"x
f^^i^S^v^ll^

12-Jun-1998 19

Normalized deviation
Average (grand-avg) (known)
2.53
WWS V. *. -. -. AU^> V ซW. ^-SV. W^WM^W
," ^r *x \ ^
" ^x-j v* i\ " \ ;\ V " v^ -*
*A^V ^*"^t%"'k^ -V o *•"ซ: xv s
3.43
- ' ^;K'>
2.27
1.83
-;?;H^-^^;---;:;
f \-.*? * ^"v^st^V^1'1'*^^ r
" v' "" ^ \> V-^^j.^
^!^i|^^;Sj
-0.30 1.50
"*i 	 %* 	 AWW - w ~w~,ซs ซ™ V. •. v^v* ^ *
\v, v^-^- - ;, \ " ••
••^^x^^^^^x^-i ?\ % * * ^.,
\:;^N;^.', ^ v> - , ;;^ ,•
2.82 4.62
-- , •",- ' -""
-1.22 0.58
-2.72 -0.92
^^r™:.y \-'^f,;-
,v> •J'Svior- - •• I \* %' % *^ "
* r!r\^vs\r~ ' **y; ~,
.^?M*'^:
^
/20

Tag

*ซ•*ซ V ~ซ
" *

' *
""'*
ft
, * ,


vV^f.
';'ป*'.
"-* o
X,*.
Data sorted by Laboratory Average
Average Tag
1.30
1.53
1.70
1.73
1.77
1.80
1.80
1.80
1.83
1.87
1.87
1.90
1.90
1.93
1.97
2.03
2.03
2.10
2.13
2.17
2.17
2.17
2.27
2.27
2.27
2.37
2.40

• s No data submitted
0 s Insufficient data
Lab
JS
MX
KB.
D3
HL
RX
HK
DB
XM
P
AE
U
OX
CJ
AZ
TQ
BK
S
QZ
SI
Q
EO
XL
UQ
O
UP
WH

Average Tag
2.40
2.40
2.40
2.40
2.43
2.47
2.47
2.47
2.47
2.47
2.53
2.53
2.57
2.57
2.60
2.60
2.63
2.67
2.67
2.70
2.70
2.77
2.83
2.87
2.87
2.90
2.90
2.90
TAG SYMBOLS
Lab
EL
BH
HE
DE
BM
RZ
C
BO
AL
AF
X
WO
RD
L
CA
AK
AJ
CS
BC
E
A
FN
SS
QU
GQ
TN
PW
I
Average
2.93
2.97
3.07
3.07
3.07
3.10
3.13
3.13
3.17
3.17
3.23
3.27
3.30
3.43
3.47
3.53
3.57
3.60
3.63
3.67
3.80
4.30
4.43
5.07
5.13
5.87
10.43
12.33

x =ฃ Determined to be an outlier
Tag


ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
x
x.
X
X
X
ft s Above control
$ s Below control
Lab
EB
DZ
WR
JY
AW
HP
we
N
VI
JE
CE
VA
DT
XI
W
KL
K
TD
MF
NJ
BA
SM
GN
SD
VH
sx
sz
RK
limit
Limit

-------
20/20  ESD-LV Performance Evaluation: Uranium-Radium in Water,  12-Jun-1998
Radium-228

 % responding labs	Frequency distribution
 10
                                -i.i-.r i     in .HT ii y. ..i...
-6     '      -4     '     -2           T          +2  '   '     -^      '     +6
               Normalized deviation of the mean from the known value
   responding labs                Frequency distribution
                  .   :••••-•-•  • II Til -if. if •-  -T...
                 4-20+2
-6           -4           -2           0           +2           +4           +6
              Normalized deviation of the mean from the grand average

-------