73-GRN-3
SOURCE TEST REPORT
ON MEASUREMENT OF PARTICULATE EMISSIONS
FROM STOCKTON GRAIN ELEVATOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA
FOR
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
THOMAS E. WARD
PROJECT TEST OFFICER
engineering* inc.
2324 S. W. 34th STREET / GAINESVILLE, FLORIDA 32601 / PHONE 904/372-3318
-------
73-GRN-3
SOURCE TEST REPORT
ON MEASUREMENT OF PARTICULATE EMISSIONS
FROM STOCKTON GRAIN ELEVATOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA
FOR
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
THOMAS E. WARD
PROJECT TEST OFFICER
-------
SOURCE TEST REPORT
PLANT TESTED: Stockton Grain Elevators
San Francisco, California
TESTOR: Environmental Engineering, Inc.
2324 Southwest 34 Street
Gainesville, Florida 32601
CONTRACT NO: 68-02-0232 - Task Order No. 20
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page No.
INTRODUCTION 1
SUMMARY OF RESULTS 2
LOCATION OF SAMPLING POINTS 6
SAMPLING PROCEDURES 8
LABORATORY ANALYSIS 9
APPENDICES
A. PARTICULATE EMISSION CALCULATIONS
B. FIELD DATA SHEETS
C. SAMPLING DESCRIPTION
D. PLANT OPERATING DATA
E. ANALYTICAL DATA
F. FIELD TEST LOG
G. PROJECT PARTICIPANTS
-------
INTRODUCTION
On January 10 and 11, 1973, participate emission tests were
conducted on the outlet of the baghouse servicing the tunnel belt con-
veyor at Stockton grain elevators located at Pier 90 San Francisco,
California.
The baghouse is used to remove the dust caused by dumping
grains onto the conveyor belt which transports the grain to storage
and loading onto ships.
In order to test, it was first necessary to construct a stack.
extension to the baghouse outlet. This was done using a 20-inch I.D.
galvanized sheet metal duct. Details are shown in Figure 1.
Five tests were conducted on the two days; tests 1,2, and
3 on Wednesday the llth', each test being 80 minutes in length; and
tests 4 and 5 on Thursday the 12th, the 4th test being 80 minutes in
length with the 5th and final test being 70 minutes duration due to
plant shutdown.
-------
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
A summary of the test results is included in Table 1. Of
particular interest are the results of test No. 4. The emissions for
this run were 30 times as much as the average emissions for runs 1, 2,
3, and 5, of 0.102 Ibs/hour. It was noted that on washing the probe
and nozzle during clean-up on this run, the acetone was very yellow.
After evaporation of the acetone, a yellow, gummy residue remained.
The Environmental Protection Agency project officer directed that this
data not be included in averaging the test results.
Shortly after completion of the tests the dry gas meter used
in measuring gas volumes was calibrated using a wet test meter. It
was discovered that the meter was in error by approximately 28%. The
results listed in Table 1 use the corrected gas volumes found by mul-
tiplying the difference between the final and initial meter readings
by 1.283.
To prevent any misunderstanding, the initial and final meter
readings together with the uncorrected and corrected gas volumes for
each run are presented in Table 2.
The complete particulate emission calculations are included
in Appendix A.
-------
TABLE 1
SOURCE. ZE&Z
TEST NO -
PLANT - STOCKTON GRAIN ELEVATORS
SOURCE - TUNNEL BELT OUTLET
TYPE OF PLANT - GRAIN STORAGE
CONTROL EQUIPMENT - PAGHOVM '
POLLUTANTS SAMPLED - PARTICULATES
HO OF RUNS - 5
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIF.
DRUfJ NUMBER
2)DATE
3) TIME BEGAN
H)TIME END
5)BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, IN IIG
6)METER ORIFICE PRESSURE DROP, IN EG
7) VOL DRY GAS, METER COND, CUBIC FEET
Q)AVERAGE GAS METER TEMPERATURE, DEC F
- DRY, 70 DEGREES £', 29.92 IiiCHES MERCURY***
-------
TABLE 1
(continued)
TEST NO -
PLAliT - STOCKTOll GRAIN ELEVATORS
SOURCE - TUiJNEL BELT OUTLET
TYPE OF PLAliT - <77?/l 77.' nTORA (77?
CONTROL EQUIPMENT - VAOFOVSF,
POLLUTANTS SAMPLED - PARTICULARS
NO OF RUNS - 5
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIF.
1)RUU NUMBER . ., 1 ___ y.
2)DATE
3) TIME BEGAN l_a-lU
H)TIi.lE EHD i_ia^
S)BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, IN HG l_a1
&)METER ORIFICE PRESSURE DROP, IK HG
7) VOL DRY GAS, METER CO NO, CUBIC FEET
8) AVERAGE GAS METER TEMPERATURE, DEC F
9) VOL DRY GAS, S.T.P. , CUBIC FEET
10) TOTAL H20 COLLECTED, ML
11) VOL H20 VAPOR COLLECTED, S.T.P. , CU
12)STACK GAS MOISTURE, PERCENT VOLUME
13) ASSUMED STACK GAS MOISTURE, PCT VOL
1H) PER CENT C02
15)PERCENT 02 -
It) PER CENT CO
17) PERCENT 112
18)PERCEHT EXCESS AIR
13)MOLSCULAR WEIGHT OF STACK CAS, DRY
2Q)tiOLECULAR' VVKtlfi! OF STACK CAS, STK CO
21)Si1/ic;^ CAS SPECftlC GRAVITY
22)AVG SQUARE ROOT (VEL HEAD), IN H20
23) AVERAGE STACK GAS TEMPERATURE, DEC F J._62
2^)AVG SQUARE ROOT (STK TEMP*VEL HEAD) i_3U._597
25)Pir02l CORRECTION FACTOR l_°i.83
2b)STACX PRESSURE, III HG, ABSOLUTE I_3£ii2
27) STACK GAS VEL, STACK COilD, P. P.M. i_§ii2i2
28) STACK AREA, SQ FEET i_l^iS
2°,) EFFECTIVE STACK AREA, SQUARE FEET l.iiiS
30)STA(,'K GAS FLOV RATS, S.T.P. , SCFMD
31);^-:' TLJE OF TEST, iiluUXSS
HOZZLE DIAMETER, INCHES
IMKIMtiTIC
PARTICUT.ATR FHIFSinfJS (WR/T1R)
FRONT HflLF SUBTOTAL
PACK VALP SUBTOTAL
TOTALS
PARTICULATE EMISSIONS (IBS/TON PRODUCT)
FRONT HALF SUBTOTAL 979.89x10
BACK HALF SUBTOTAL 4.08 x 10
TOTAL 983. 97x1 0
1 ____ 5. _____ J.
l__i/ii/.za-l
l__llj-lQ. __ 1
_
. l_a^0S _____ -1 __ a._tta ____ 1
i_l3a^SSa_- 1 __ llS_aatt._l
l_53,.l _____ i__£S..a ____ 1
JLaaiU2£l__J.__lZZ_ZLi.J.
1_1B_2 _____ l.-Zi^l ____ 1
FTi_.Q_£a _____ ll^li ____ 1
i_Q^& ______ l__a*.2. _____ 1
1_2 ________ i ___ 2. ______ 1
j_
1
!___
1_ _
1 NA.
j[
_ 1 .
__ 1_.
1 .
1
-_NJL .
._ 1
1
_1
. _i
_ 1
1__28..85 ___ J.
NDl_28^7B ____ 1__28..75 ___ |
i_0..99 _____ l__2.i.99_ ____ J_
|
J.
1__35._334 __ J_
J. __ £._83
__.
1 __ fill8-
1__2.L18
J_
1
1
1
j_
.
-1_0^25 _____ ^.Elli ____ i
!
3 202 . HH xlO" 1 2 . 20 xl 0"^
13.71x10" * 6 3 . '*3 xlO",
3306.15x10 75.61x10"
"^
";?
"b
3.33xlO
"5
17.33x10
20. 66x1 0"
c
"
***S .T.P.-
DRY, 70 DEGREES
29.92 J liCllES 1-1ER CUHY* * *
4
-------
TABLE 2
CORRECTED GAS VOLUMES
A. TEST NO. 1 2 345
B. FINAL GAS 272.643 378.431 485.332 587.091 677.053
METER READING .
C. ' INITIAL GAS 171.665 276.700 378.432 485.332 587.120
METER READING
*D. UNCORRECTED GAS 100.978 101.731 106.900 101.759 89.933
VOLUME COLLECTED
(B-C)
*E. CORRECTED GAS 129.555 130.521 137.153 138.751 122.215
VOLUME (1.283 X D)
*
At meter conditions
-------
LOCATION OF SAMPLING POINTS
Sampling points were selected using the guidelines presented
in Method No. 1 of the Federal Register (Volume 36, Number 247,
December 23, 1971, pp. 24882 - 24883). The field data sheet with the
location of the sampling points is included with other field data in
Appendix B.
Figure 1 is a diagram of the baghouse and constructed duct-
work with sampling ports.
-------
-6-0"
24"
27"
24-'
i
7
/^/*
r'^VrNi*
^e=^
\ . - -
'
i I
I
1
"i
6:O'
T
24"
4S° "ELBOW
^^ rfX
NEW 27X13
TO 2.O" DIA
TRA^4SIT|ON
N E W
4-5° ELBOW
NEW 20" 'DIA
EXHAUST
STACK
EXAUST
POUT 6
EXIST. BLOG WALL
PLAN VIEW
INLET
PORT
-------
SAMPLING PROCEDURES
The methods used were those outlined in Method No. 5 of the
Federal Register (Vol. 36, No. 247, Part II, December 23, 1971). Upon
direction of the EPA project test officer, the probe and filter were
not heated. A complete description of the sampling method used is in-
cluded in Appendix C.
8
-------
LABORATORY ANALYSIS
All laboratory analyses were performed by Environmental
Engineering, Inc. This included analysis of acetone and deionized
water blanks removed from the plastic rinse bottles at the testing
site.
All analyses were conducted under the guidelines of Method
No. 5 of the Federal Register (Vol. 36, No. 159, August 17, 1971).
-------
APPENDIX A
Participate Emission Calculations
-------
PB
PS
AS
AS1
NPTS
TS
TM
H
£H
AN
CP
VM
VC
Pn
EXPLANATION OF E.E.I. SOURCE SAMPLING CALCULATION SHEET
Barometric pressure, inches Hg
Stack pressure, inches Hg
Stack area, sq. ft.
Effective area of positive stack gas flow, sq. feet
Number of traverse points where the pi tot velocity head was greater than zero
Stack temperature, OR
Meter temperature, °R _
Average square root of velocity head, //inches H^O
Average meter orifice pressure differential, inches
Sampling nozzle area, square feet
S-type pi tot tube correction factor
Recorded meter volume sample, cubic feet (meter conditions)
Condsnsate and silica gel increase in impingers, millilitcrs
HgO
- Pressure at the dry test meter orifice, PB + H } inches Hg
n
STP- Standard conditions, dry, 70 F, 29.92 inches Hg
VWV- Conversion of condensate in milliliters to water vapor in cubic feet (STP)
VSTPD- Volume sampled, cubic feet (STP)
VT- Total water vapor volume and dry gas volume sampled, cubic feet (STP)
W- Moisture fraction of stack gas
FDA- Dry gas fraction
- Assumed moisture from preliminary check
MD- Molecular weight of stack gas, Ibs/lb-mole
MS- Molecular weight of stack gas, Ibs/lb-mole
GS- Specific gravity of stack gas, referred to
FA- Excess air, %
//HxTS- Average square root of velocity head times stack temperature
U- Stack gas velocity, feet per minute
QS- Stack gas flow rate, cubic feet per minute
QD- Stack gas flow rate, cubic feet per minute
QSTPD- Stack gas flow rate, cubic feet per minute
PISO- Percent isokinatic volume sampled (method described
ESTP- Pollutant concentration, grains per std. cubic'feet
E12- Pollutant concentration, grains per std. cubic feet (Corrected
E50- Pollutant concentration, grains per std. cubic feet (Corrected
EM- Pollutant emission rate, Ibs. per hour
(dry conditions)
(stack conditions)
air
(stack conditions)
(dry conditions)
(STP)
in Federal Register)
to
to
122
50%
co?)
EAJ
.-.7. nc.
-------
iUZCi: SA^LIUCT CALCULATIONS
PLANT- STOCKTON GPAIN ELEVATORS SAN FXAVCISCO, CALIF. DATE- 1/10/73
STACK- TUNNEL BELT OUTLET RUfJ 1 FROM 9:05-10:35
WEATHEP CONDITIONS- CLOUD? PX- 30.12 IK 77(7 PS- 30.12 J." F'C
AS'- 2.18 SQ. FEET T£- 522 DEGREES P . TM- 514.8 DEGREES P. £- 1.513 Iff F>?.0
A£- 9.04 IK 1120 AN-~0.0003 41 SQ. FEET "?- 0.83 VH- 129. 555 CF VC- 24.7 ML
TOTAL TIME- 80 Miff ffP?5- 16 OESATt
). 0474]ix7"/c") 1) JjJJ_ 5CF
( i>30)x( W-/)x(pS + ( Agrl3.6) ) )*( 2S.92x3W ) 2) J^Jj^i1!} S.CF
= (VWV) + (VSTPD) ~ ' 3).
= (W/) * (/?) 4).
5)FOX = (1.0 - fc') 5) W
&)ASSUML'D MOISTURE FRACTIOi! 6) j?^^2
T)UD = (.44xC02) + (.32x02) t ( . 28x (CO+N2)) . 7) .?.§_. JJI
' 8)W6' = (MD*FDA) t (18xf/) 8)__Jj)^JJ
''9)CS = (AfJ) * (28.99) 9) JL.12
10') ^ ^_ (100) x (02-0. OXCO)T( ^(0. 266x//2)- (02-0. SxgQ) ) 10) j?
' 12)113^51111
(y_) x (/i5>) . 13).
(QS) x (fDX) 14)
15 )
)-i e \ Q Q il °*
Ao ' ^_______ii__
( lb.U3xI ) T (^l'P£>) (///ir-S : GRAIiJS/SCF
18)i,'12 = ( 12xi;5J1P ) T (W02) UNITS : GRAIUS/SCF
19)i'50 = ( c'5i-'px(lOO+ir/l) ) T (150) UNITS : GRAIUS/SCF
20)EM = (0. 008S7)x(£'5i''P)x(CS:rPZ)) UKITS : POUNDS/HOUR
______________________-___
i i_l_ 1 LESZE3. IS12J iQJ5/.IQR)IiSS^£n
I
I
T I x10~5 xlO"3
FALF SUf.T - .3000 .0337X 10 f I 0 82 3 19
BACK PALE SUP70 - 12.0000 1.3tnix 10~ I 32*72 127*62
TOTALS - 12.3000 1.3R28X 10"3 .- . 33!54 13o!si
I
I
I
I
«« V «^^M «.B«^<«^ V^,W^^*«»^*l*^^^«» i.«.^ «^^«^^ «»..«^ "I^"^ ^»^^^"-^ " ^^ ^^-^^*» «^«
COl-iMZtWS : .
Larry. Wurts
~"~ {C-^C^ ) vnvintnmt-ntal engineering, inc.
-------
PLAUT- STOCKTON GRAIN ELEVATORS SAI4 FRANCISCO. CALIF. DATE- 1/10/73
STACK- TUUH'EL BELT OUTLET RUN 2 FROM 11:15-12-40
WEATHER COUDITIOiiS- CLOVDX PS - 30. 12 IN HG PS- 30.12 J.v HG
AS1- 2.1U Sd. FEET .££- 524 DEGREES R - 2tf- 516.6 DEGREES R' £- 1.512 IN H20
Afl- 9.08 IN H20 Aii- 0.000341 SQ. FEET CP- 0.83 VM- 130.521 CF VC- 28.4 ML
TOTAL TIME- 80 1-1IN fJPTS- 16 ORSAT:
= (0. 0474)x( VC) 1) 1,31 SCF
'2)VSTPD = ( ( 530)x( W-/)x(PB + (^gvl3.6) ) )*( 29.92xT££ ) 2 )__J_a2.Jia£_ 5££,
3)Vi' = (VW) ( (VSTPD) ~ 3) 1_?Q_._1 uu
4)W = (7WV) * (VT) *).
S)FDA = (1.0 - P/) 5).
6)ASSUMED MOISTURE FRACTIOli 6).
7)WD = (.44xC02) + (.32x02) + (.28*(CO+U2)) _ 7).
*)MS = (MD*FDA) + (18xf/) '8).
9)CS = (MS) * (28.99 ) 9).
=_JJLO_0)x(02-0. 5xC0)*( (0. 266x//2 )-(02-0. 5xCO) ) 10).
I(H*VS~) ) = (lT//)x6-t//.;(|/(//x2'S) ) .H).
= (i/) x (AS*) . 13)__J,PJJ)J d££-ii
14)Q0 = ((JS) x (FD/j)
J= ((^D) x ( 530Ting ) x (PSv29.92)
= ( 15.43xy ) * (VSTPD) ~ UlilTS : GRAIHS/SCF
18H'12 = ( 12*ESTP ) T (%C02) UNITS : GRAIES/SCF
19)i'50 = ( fi'STPxCioO+^l) ) * (150) UUITS : GRAIliS/SCF
20)EM = (0. 00857)x(i-1srP)x(CSi"P/)) t/WITS : POUNDS/HOUR
I'ARTICUlArlTldB'^l^l^
(
I
i yin~ vin
FROiiT HALF SUBT - .4000 .0448 xlO'3 , i /1R A 97
BACK HALF SUBTO - 13.2000 1.4781 xlO'3 ' oc 70 1^071
MMLS - 13.6000 1.5229x10-3 |g;JJ {j^JJ
. I.
I
I
.1
._ 1 1 ;
COKMEiJTS : ;
Ts!ST CONDUCTED BX :
kiiry_ii|irJ:i
~~ ~ f|O^I/ ) t'nrirwnmrnfaf engineering, iru:
-------
PLANT- STOCKTON GRAIN ELEVATORS
STACK- TUNNEL BELT OUTLET
WEATHER COiiDITIOflS- CLOUDY
AS'- 2.18 SQ. FEET XS.-' 524 DEGREES R
Afl- 9.69 Iff H20 AN- 0.000341 SQ. FEET
TOTAL TIME- 80 MI li NPTS- 16 OR SAT:
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIF.
DATE- 1/10/73
RUN 3 FROM 2:05-3:40
PS- 30.12 Iff HG PS- 30.12 Iff HG
Itt- 517.1 DEGREES R fi- 1.586 III H20
CP- 0.83 VM- 137.153 CF VC- 27.4 ML
= (0.0474)x(/C) 1
29. 9 2x TAJ ) . 2)___iJUi_aa_a. SCF
3)7!' =.(WIO + (VSTPD) 3)___UiJa_l£JL ££Z
'^ = ( 1. 0 - V) 5)
6)ASSUMED MOISTURE FRACTION 6)" a_O2-
7)
-------
PLANT- STOCKTON GRAIN ELEVATORS
STACK- TUlitiEL BELT OUTLET
WEATHER COriDITIOiiS- CLOUDY
AS'- 2.18 Ski. FEET 2£- 522 DEGREES R
SAli FRAUCISCO, CALIF.
DATE- 1/11/73
RUK 4 FROM 9:10-10:35
PS- 30.12 I// HG PS- 30.12 III HG
- 513.1 DEGREES R fl- 1.514 I A' H20
Afl- a. 05 IN 1120 AH- 0.000341 SQ. FEET CP- 0.83 VM- 130.557 CF VC- 18.7 ML
TOTAL TIME- 80 MIN UPTS- 16 OR SAT:
= (0.0474)x(VC)
(VSTPD) ~ 3).
5)FDA = (1.0 - fc') 5)1__0_,_9_9_4
6)ASS'UMED MOISTURE FRACTIOil 6 )___0_._0_2
DUD = (.44xC02) + (.32x02) + ( . 28x (C0 + //2 ) ) 7 )___2_8_,_8_5
8)M6' = (MD*FDA) + (18xf-/) 8 )___2_8_._7_8
9)C6' = (MS) T (28.99) 9) 0_,J)_9
= (100)x(Q2-0.5xCO)*( (0. 266x//2)-(02-0.5xCQ) ) 10) 0 £
) )*AVC( xlO"5 xin-3
FRONT HALF SUBT - 312.2000 34.7186x10-3 197989 329244
BACK HALF SUBTO - 1.3000 .1446x10-3 .'Q& ?g^
TOTALS . - 313.5000 34.8632x10-3 [g83]97 330e!l5
... JL_ ... 1
COMMENTS :
TEST CONDUCTED VY :
~ [C^L"^ ) enrimnmi'nlal cnqinffrintf, inr.
-------
EVG.iUEEB.IliG, lil
PLANT- STOCKTON GRAIN ELEVATORS SAN FRANCISCO. CALIF. DATE- 1/11/73
STACK- TUNNEL BELT OUTLET
WEATHER COilDITIOKS- CLOUDX
AS '-2.18 SQ. FEET '£$,- 522 DEGREES R
Afl- 9."+3 IN H20 AH- 0.0003H1 SQ. FEET
TOTAL TIME- 70 MIN NPTS- 16 ORSAT:
RUN 5 FROM 11:10-12:25
PB- 30.12 III I1G PS- 30.12 III' HG
H- 515.3 DEGREES R fi- 1.547 IH H20
CP- 0.83 VM- 115.384 CF VC- 24.1 ML
= (0. 0474)x( W)
= (VWV) + (VSTPD) ~ 3) .
= (1.0 - ff) 5)1"
6)ASSUMED MOISTURE FRACTION 6)__j
T)MD - (.44x£02) + (.32x02) + ( . 28x (CO+H2)) 7) 2jB.»J
8)W5 = (MD*FDA) + (18xf/) 8) .2JL.-
9)C£ = (MS) r (28.99) 9) J?_..2J
(0.266x/,/2)-(02-0.5xCQ)
)*AVG( J(HxTS) ) 12) J
13)CS = (U.) x (AS'}
= (QS~) x (FDA)
5= (i^/J) x ( 530*££ ) x (PS*29.92) 15)_.
)ESTP = ( 15.43xy ) T (VSTi'D) ~ ~UUITS : GRAIi.'S/SCF ' '. -'
: CRAII1S/SCF
19)£'50 = ( ESTPxaQQ+EA) ) T (150) UNITS : GRAIUS/SCF
20)EM = (0.008S7)x(£S2''P)x(CS:rP0) UNITS : POUNDS/HOUR . .
--_-________-.
, xlO'5 xlO'3
FRONT HALF SUBT - 1.0000 .1263x10-3 3 33 12 20
BACK HALF SUBTO - 5.2000 .6565xlO'3 I 17*33 63*43
TOTALS - 6.2000 .7828X10'3 |2o'.66 75'.63
!
I
I
I
I
i ; ; J
COMMtiti'HS : . . __. .
TEST CONDUCTED By : BatJOlJEaajl
^Ls.cny_Mu.its
"""-~~~~~~~'"V~~~ iC^C') ) cnvinntmt-nlnl rnflinrering. irn:
-------
APPENDIX B
FIELD DATA SHEETS
-------
PRELIMINARY VELOCITY TRAVERSE
OATE
LQCATIHN T/;/V/-A:.
STACK l.D.
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, in. Hg
STACK GAUGE PRESSURE, in. H20
OPERATORS /? &(JK
L~. j/JUrZ
SCHEMATIC OF TRAVERSE POINT LAYOUT
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
y
2.
-?
Lj
1
2L
3
H
AVERAGE
VELOCITY
HEAD
(Aps), in.H20
1,3
£.2
2, 9
i
a 3
/ ?0
1
2...*>Q
r». ^
a. 5
STACK
TEMPERATURE
X -,
62.
n
(i
1 V
n
M
'«
If
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
AVERAGE
VELOCITY
HEAD
(Aps), in.H20
STACK
TEMPERATURE
(Ts), °F
EPA (Dur) 233
4/72
-------
TRAVERSE POINT LOCATION FOR CIRCULAR DUCTS
PLANT
DATE
SAMPLING LOCATION T/v/v//vFl
INSIDE OF FAR WALL TO
OUTSIDE OF NIPPLE, (DISTANCE A) _
INSIDE OF NEAR WALL TO
OUTSIDE OF NIPPLE. (DISTANCE B) _
STACK I.D., (DISTANCE A - DISTANCE B).
NEAREST UPSTREAM DISTURBANCE
NEAREST DOWNSTREAM DISTURBANCE.
CALCULATOR /?. J
SCHEMATIC OF SAMPLING LOCATION
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
/
3.
-;>
1
FRACTION
OF STACK I.D.
*.7
Q^
-7_r
^2,3
STACK I.D.
30*1
~>OiV
2 o "!
iJ<3-v
PRODUCT OF
COLUMNS 2 AND 3
(TO NEAREST 1/8 INCH)
/$r
5y/
/^/;
/ ^ ^ x/
DISTANCE B
-
TRAVERSE POINT LOCATION
FROM OUTSIDE OF NIPPLE
(SUM OF COLUMNS 4 & 5)
;V"
£"
>s"
>%%''
EPA (Dui) 232
4/72
-------
PLANT
DATF
NOMOGRAPH DATA
ft F
--7 3
SAMPLING LOCATION 7~UA//VF.L £ FjLT flur/fTl -
CALIBRATED PRESSURE DIFFERENTIAL ACROSS
ORIFICE, in. H20
AVERAGE METER TEMPERATURE (AMBIENT + 20 °F),°F
PERCENT MOISTURE IN GAS STREAM BY VOLUME
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE AT METER, in. Hg
STATIC PRESSURE IN STACK, in. Hg
(Pm±0.073 x STACK GAUGE PRESSURE in in. H20)
RATIO OF STATIC PRESSURE TO METER PRESSURE
AVERAGE STACK TEMPERATURE, °F.
AVERAGE VELOCITY HEAD, in. H20
MAXIMUM VELOCITY HEAD, in. H20
C FACTOR .
CALCULATED NOZZLE DIAMETER, in.
ACTUAL NOZZLE DIAMETER, in.
REFERENCE Ap, in. H20
AH@
Tmavg.
BWO
pm
ps
. PVPm
savg.
Apavg.
APmax.
).7o
So
^%
J?o. / a
3o'l^
i
fe
2' "3
2.?
0-1Y
%"
r t
hr
o.V7
EPA (Our) 234
4/72
-------
*
r!
PLANT .S"./5 . .rf-A/h/A/ TEKMIA/HL Pica. e]O
/-. <'-'
-.. r/;.;<
j c / ' '..-
'I
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
i
/
a
"-?
u
a
I
"7
3-
Ll
t
DATE / \ O - "7..?
SAMPLING LC
SAMPLE TYP
RUN NUMBER
OPERATOR _
AMBIENT TEf
BAROMETRIC
STATIC PRES
FILTER NUM
\. CLOCK TIME
SAMPLING X^CLOCK,
TIME.min /O >«^
" __
//? "
J5«
1 c''
IY' ^"-^
) y^"
r- /'
/< "
f
I ''\ '''/'>, "
'CATION YUA/A// L Kf Lf 0UTt.t
F P/JpT/'CC/ A/17£
1
/?. rJurtcWf/i/ L>tvvfl.T2
rtPERATLJRE s .'
PRFSStlRF ,3^,. A2
SIIRF (P ) JJ6'-/ £-.
*FR(«) * ^0^(^35"
GAS METER READING
(VJ.lt3
/7^. df^ <
.)"'!
/ '. ' ,
,
/ / .''. "'
»
"-> , * ''*
^... o Y't -/
-.) i : ^ "^ .
"i *^ t '*i 1^1
i. -s / t .J., I Vj
Off-' c?
-^v;j, *-,'
2 V'/, 0
^ <:.: , 'T
2.'vV/5
D . u' o &
r -272' ^"V ?
f \ or.O'iy
/
/
if'
STT ^
VVxiv/^
:r ^"
1,
SCHEMATIC OF TRAVERSE PC
READ AND RECORD ALL DATA EVERY
VELOCITY
HEAD
(APS), in. H20
/< '' .''
// *'.<.">
^ , « ' ,' ' &T
1 "'< 5
t ^ '/''.''
,1 * '? *
1 > L/o
ILt cl$
.7 / \: c\
^ t >" }
"j1 '/'')
3. . L/0
/, i~/3o
ORIFICE PRESSURE
DIFFERENTIAL
(AH), in. H20)
DESIRED
/r, v-
'7' :/ '.
rf ,- ,':";
/ /.. ^
/i.Q
*'/?£>
'/', ^b
*7x<-\)
7>d-'..:;
'"/rO
j(\ fj
/:.'% .' '
17 £V
C/' OC)
ACTUAL
,-"' , ' '
{".,_;-
?.'.'
"'/» ?'',"?
/n» ^r
/i? f £
' ..^
'i.5(3
j,s-(j
* / .. . .'
fL ''":
Jl< /.'
/''» t'
t I '
-y/v.
9 <;-.>
?:"{
1 PROBE LEW
' ,f NOZZLE I.D.
^\ f^ ASSUMED MO
\ O. SAMPLE BOX
J^ METER BOX
METER AHa
T*
/
^
)INT LAYOUT
«5" MINUTI
STACK
TEMPERATURE
(T$),°F
"6"-^
62
& 2.
,<";''
r ' . '.»
/-,
^i.
/^
A*';:'
.*** * '*^i
/TiL
^
,/p
/f '. '
6 ".^
t*?
5TH AND TYP
F 6 <^^/?55
KTIIRF i i.%
NUMBER '
NUMBER /
/, ""' >
: FACTOR > . ? ' -e u> is -
PROBE HEATER SETTING
HEATER BOX SETTING
REFERENCE
IS
' y»Oy/
^_^
AP o y /
DRY GAS .METER
TEMPERATURE
INLET
l
^ /
C-5'.
, ' ' . :
<"2.,
/'
./ -i
j '
"/ X.'T
' 11
t
'.V/
/; _ <
^'_5
,;5" <
. '(" *";'
.,5 ^
,./;/;*
~#'JS
~ ">. . i s
PUMP
VACUUM.
in. Hg
'/ - 0
) t i^
^«T. cD
^7
< i. .'
« -T*^
y> <
//.^
'/.o
j5"'^
^o
*) t tf
.-*-,' c4.'
*>'-.?
, '>""» 0
SAMPLE BOX
TEMPERATURE,
"F
«
,
*_
«,-
.
V
~
-*.
.
»
-.
5
IMPINGER
TEMPERATURE.
°F
r
y/p*
^/^
t/ tL
/^_
//-?
// V
//J'~
COMMENTS: '
*
EPA (Out) 2K ' QO sr»*^ .
4-72 ' .
-------
PLANT JT. /=: K &A/A? rr&/fii p]rx 9
DATE > /<5-W
SAMPI INfi LOCATION 7T/VA / '/. >*'V-T CU>?<
.''*''"" /* ^' "' '
%' ' i I; ? -
^,r^
,.^'
wr-' ' .,
/ *£P
i.
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
/
2-.
* "',
H
/
/
"»
"-'.
D-
i
SAMPLE TYP
RUN NUMBER
OPERATOR _
AMBIENT TE
BAROMETRIC
STATIC PRES
FILTER NUM
"N. CLOCK TIME
TIME.min N^
" ~~- - _
/'^ /(
S "
/.'?"'=
If'y'k ''
I'/*"
1
w* '
/^ 'J
/?f 54 "
f
.: ' .-
E (?t'lf.'"' ! C. V*- <" -
PRF«IIRF J^O . / X
'tllRF, (P ) 3&< 1 :^~~
if a ($) * e>^? ^ -> ^V ^/
3«J - SCHEIV
' *'*' '- oc^^/v READ AND REC
GAS METER READING
--7r<« 7^
> :>*~j< y
^.FT; /
. " j.
.*-.' ?*7, '-? ' '
-J) ?/, '7
;> 7 , /-/
J^'^'l4/^".
*? "? '*v') / ^r''"
-?? 9~' 7
3 V£/ 2_
3 .53 ' 0
3-5°? 5?"
"5£&' ~&
372,6 -
^7^ V5/
lol.Ti,! jpr -
<'-." A/,- /
VELOCITY
HEAD
(Aps), in. H20
1 ' £"C3
y / ^'y
_> « '/
^ » '/'i')
/. 90
/ / 9o
2. --£0
J2> ^t<5
^. 7c5
J?» 7<3
/ 90
y/ 9
~7.Si';
~7> ^0
.
ACTUAL
7- ^CJ
7iJ?v7
'*/- ' ..'
.,/, /. J
/'" -50
/.-. t fa
a./-;..
?,'.>'
//(H;.'-
?» ivj.
lO.ffft
)0*
/&.<$
/Q'Sti
7> fa
"7-Xv
7 ' ^-J ''-J-
STACK
TEMPERATURE
(TS),°F
/H
i ' e _.*
'&'/
'5" ^
PROBE HEATER SETTING
HEATER BOX SETTING
REFERENCE
ES
,;" i '>'
V « ^ '*»
to'*i%
An ... f9 f iV "/
DRY GAS METER
TEMPERATURE
INLET
t/r:<
jrx
S-4
'"/
4*7
v< "''
, 5"/?
J " ~s
.'':>'*
Sw
,f -i
c5~?
57
c5 7
cT7
/; >f
..- ',', s ('
OUTLET
tT<
.."' '--<
c,5ft
<".,'
/'- ^
3 f?
.. <, ,-/
&£
. ^it
rt, ot-
S £
' " 4'
-5<^
j5t^
Ji"^
.5"/T
JT^"
Jj^
, C*7
PUMP
VACUUM,
in. Hg
6"-o"
/* < 5"
;7/ £?
-T- .")
f/. <
o
1*0
cf- 5
7' 5*
9':5"
°l'5
4/72
-------
PLANT ^.f:frftftM TT<*YKlfl/fl<- /for? Cl0
DATE I-//?--??'
SAMPI INC, LOCATION Tl>/vVJfL ».'! f >-T OU HfT'
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
1
,---
:>
11
1
2^
3
H
SAMPLE TYP
RUN NUMBER
OPERATOR
AMBIENT TEf
BAROMETRIC
STATIC PRES
_ FILTER NUM
'Sv CLOCK TIME
TIME, mill ^\
~ -,
/A"
^
\b ''
/
/^' f) I/P A ft ft-> /_ . " f/t ri
1PERATURE ^0
PBFSMIRF 7.i-> >l~l-
SIIRF (P ) 3^ / 2-
1FR(«) *rr">C''CL::{-
SCHEM
GfL^^^V^^^ READ AND REC
GAS METER READING
J5 / /? > ViJ -*~.
37/- 3
~^z\ Y.f
L/o5, 5
y/2, 5
'-/I c!> /
LI ^ 5 , y
yjy, <7^"7
3&
3- 7<3
2,, ^ O
3. ' TO
3, fio
JZ/^O
2. ',->. o
»X cr£)
"3. trO
2.«tT(O
'i. .-^/o
I2«9<^
-S.' *?S
ISTIIRF « ^1 /X/5
[NUMBER
NUMBER /
/T^ 1
X5.q'l
PROBE HEATER SETTING
HEATER BOX SETTING
REFERENCE
ATIC OF TRAVERSE POINT LAYOUT
ORD ALL DATA FVFRY . T MINUTES
ORIFICE PRESSURE
DIFFERENTIAL
(AH), in. H20)
DESIRED
7. 2*
C1t ^O
1 ha
l/.o
/(O.jT
/
y/»o
J/'O
/O'O
/rt.O
ACTUAL
7-^0
-?,.?(:?
JO -5
/.>). «;
/,,r
/{s, ^
.^''X-?
;v: '?,/
-.'./-(
t^a
j5Tp
J?.^
/ .-r
c5">r
c5"^
g e/
,5 9
57"'. 5'?'
OUTLET
u^
.S £
7
3'7
c5 V
,5' 7
S~?
JT*'.F«V
PUMP
VACUUM,
in. Hg
7' S
-;. -*
'^ c?
%", O
7' o
7- 0
^'- a
^. &
yf^
t/,5
*>.o
S>0
S* o
4;; ^
v5'<^
,^<9
SAMPLE BOX
TEMPERATURE,
°F
-
-
-
-
__ t
-
-
.
FJ
IMPINGER
TEMPERATURE.
"F
.5" 2.
£~-2_
, 5"2_
^" I?.
jTo
jr.?.
.5'V.j
s5 r?
-5^o
/^£>
f//^
^/ fr
L/-
L ' g
4 £>
COMMENTS: . .
EPA(Dur)235 ' (TO/mt^-x .
- 4.^72 . . ' . . . .
-------
r
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
/
2_
3
L/
J
'2
"l
L\-
PLANT ^ J-.-^ (^-S?/J/r.l If:*? S3^ f-J C>- "7 <
DATF / //- y?
SAMPLING LC
SAMPLE TYP
RUN NUMBER
OPERATOR
AMBIENT TEf
BAROMETRIC
STATIC PRES
FILTER NUM
\. CLOCK TIME
TIME.fflin ^\^
-H iu£
r,
.''>
'/'' '
>.-,
.?C3
<»
3'i
o T.i5
5
;t') i^'f ! f tst/2'f-
1
(IPERATURE J^.5
PRFKIIRF -?,0./tl..
3 ' '/
3^?.g-
\7>j /.^
_-';'-i3.-V
6-Jo/
*\2S-t~7&~~7
'
-S"V^- "^
.rr'/;.; . ~7
3:25"*^
_3"^,^ . "z
^fxO/^O
.
5^1-5
; '^9f~7> <3C\\
.j.-.T r-Ci
,/. 1 f ^ : .,.-. ,
VELOCITY
HEAD
(APS), in. H20
/ 75
/ 7/5
7?. , 3
r?...,"
"- o
*~~. (' >
. ^ ,^>
, v / "
_' ' ^
I?,- <2
r? . «-3
-,.7
_7J - ''
^» '5
^ .5.
J'7-5
y.75
- j.r///
.y
PROBE LEN
NOZZLE I.D
£/T 7~ ASSUMED MO
SAMPLE BO)
METER BOX
METER AH,
C FACTOR
PROBE HEA
HEATER BO
REFERENCE
ATIC OF TRAVERSE POINT LAYOUT
ORD ALL DATA FVFRY fT MINUTES
ORIFICE PRESSURE
DIFFERENTIAL
(AH), in. H20)
DESIRED
~?, O'l)
~7.c;r:>
(. ~i (.'
''/, If
j~J , g>
/?&
/O- <:>
/.') O
^lO
%cJ
jfi.^
if}, ^f
/() . o
/>'. '(')
7 o
7-v
ACTUAL
~7.
7.tt>
9 l{
J, -Y
/ /**
/*' )
/*>. 3
/c\ 0
//> o
<%'-.()
<7;.r>
/CnL>
A^-5
/&> (j
/6,O
-7.6
'/'O
/.r>-
STACK
TEMPERATURE
'
5 2"-
:T2,'/5
_5~'/
5/
j, f/
-'7
yj '/
.'> '/
/S (/
- y
^'/
<<, ;v/
OUTLET
.'/'I
/; y
^ ;./
./ ""»
i _j *
5" 2
/;'2.
'j "^
'";'?..
J"/- ^5
-^".)
5 >'
.5""
'1 * "i
.- .:
s -;
, * j
,.5,.?
T 3
C-' -'It
PUMP
VACUUM,
in. Kg
5
5
X"
^-
g'
r
/''/ j>
."r-, S
- N
>
*, X
,~
SAMPLE BOX
TEMPERATURE.
°F
/"
/
/
1
^
/
\
1
I
/
/
\
"\
/
v
\
v
>
IMPINGER
TEMPERATURE.
°F
V 5
I
/
/
i-
I
i
rjr
Ij5
l/~7
/
(
\
./
/
-------
PLANT ^
DATE
/>/r*
SAMPLING LOCATION /W.-V./-'
SAMPLE TYPE
RUN NUMBER
OPERATOR
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE ^^
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE ^ I 2...
STATIC PRESSURE, (P$) )&' > --.
FILTER NUMBER (s)
PROBE LENGTH AND TYPE.
NOZZLE I.D. yt-f
ASSUMED MOISTURE, 3
SAMPLE BOX NUMBER
METER BOX NUMBER
METER AHg
CFACTOR
/*;
;' >\
,':'-3
'-! ''"' //'$<'
O /!' ''''
S
/O
/'*
?-6 fz:l5
.-'', /=.'?:!
;?o / ..':';.
/
/
^
£'-,'£: V '/
VELOCITY
HEAD
(APS), in. H20
"2.-0"
2-«5
i- 7
2. "7
^o
2.. 3
C? , O
2 -^
1 >7 5
h~75
~~> . ")
J?'5
3"'£>
J?-5
- /5-/' ,t
.TM ^
/--, .*!''
' /O.o
jo. a
"rr
₯
~7>o
7. o
-7,0
cf,
/O'O
STACK
TEMPERATURE
(TS),°F
6Z.
/
1
^
£2
& 2-
/
/
t
\
V
-.'-'^"
DRY GAS METER
TEMPERATURE
INLET
r/
f , *)
,-T/
,'j 7
/'-.; /;
v .';
^ /
i.-'/. <" b
J>3
SS
.^0
5"^
'V -7
v' ' ^
£-5-33
->t-!'(>
PUMP
VACUUM,
in. Kg
fr
(}-
'-.;'
_^}
5
i
3"
5
tf
(./'
c
5
'7
'7
SAMPLE BOX
TEMPERATURE,
°F
/
/
(
""X
}
/
\
/
V
/
^
>N
i
1
i
/
IMPINGER
TEMPERATURE.
°F
V5
j
.*
I
1
1
f
V
V ^
/
/
I
\
^r
^
COMMENTS:
EPA (Dur) 235
4-72
-------
APPENDIX C
SAMPLING PROCEDURES
-------
SAMPLING PROCEDURES USED AT STOCKTON GRAIN ELEVATORS
Prior to performing the actual tests, it was necessary to
determine the following stack parameters: average temperature, velocity
head, moisture content, and number of sampling points to be used.
The average stack gas temperature was determined with a bi-
metallic dial type thermometer.
The average velocity head was found by making a traverse of
the stack with a calibrated type "S" pitot tube and inclined manometer.
A copy of this preliminary velocity traverse is included in Appendix B.
Moisture content of the stack gases was estimated from local
weather data.
The number and location of the sampling points was found
using Method No. 1 of the Federal Register (Vol. 36, No. 247, December
23, 1971, Section 2.1.3 and Table 1-1, pp. 24882 - 24883). A copy of
the traverse point locations on each diameter sampled is included in
Appendix B.
The sampling train used consisted of the following equipment:
a stainless steel nozzle; a glass-lined probe; a Gelman Type "A" glass
fiber filter; two Greenburg-Smith impingers, each containing 100ml
deionized water; one dry impinger; one impinger containing about 180
grams of silica gel (the first, third, and fourth impingers had modi-
fied tips with 1/2-inch I.D. openings, the second impinger had a
standard tip); a thermometer on the fourth impinger; flexible sampling
-------
line, air-tight pump; dry test gas meter; and a calibrated orifice with
inclined manometer attached. Figure 2 is a schematic diagram of the
sampling train.
The impingers were held in an ice bath to condense the mois-
ture in the stack gas.
Two ports located at right angles to each other were used
for sampling. Four points on each diameter were sampled each for ten
minutes making each test a total of 80 minutes. One exception to this
procedure occurred on run No. 5. The last two points sampled during
this test were sampled for five minutes each in order to finish the test
before the plant shut down.
-------
SAMPLE RECOVERY .
Sample recovery was carried out in accordance with Method
No. 5 of the Federal Register (Vol. 36, No. 159, August 17, 1971).
To insure that the samples remained uncontaminated between testing and
lab analysis, they were stored in clean glass mason jars equipped
with teflon seals.
-------
10
gtffl
nj? W
Qrx QI
19
1. Nozzle
2. P'rcbs
3. Filter
4. Heated Compartment
5. Ice Bath ' -
5. I-.pir.cer with 100 ml distilled water
7. !-:-;ir.cer with 100 ml distilled water
S. In:pir;ger - dry
9. Ir.pinger - dry
'". Ther-r.o:;:eter . .
. Flexible samole line .
l-'ain control valve
Air tight vacuum punip
By-pass control valve
Dry test neter
/ . Calibrated orifice
3.' Inclined msncrr.ater
type pi tot tube
"S:1
Figure 2
-------
APPENDIX D
PLANT OPERATING DATA
-------
A. Process Description
The tunnel belt system collects the dust generated as grain
is discharged from the storage silos onto any of the three conveyor
belts in the tunnel. The belts are 42 inches wide and have a carry-
ing capacity of 750 T/hr. They are hooded along their entire length.
Dust is aspirated at several points along the belt and also from
the leg boots into which the grain discharges from the belts. Inlet
and outlet tests were conducted on the fabric filter while milo was
being transferred from one storage bin.,to another. This transfer of
the grain called "turning" is done to cool it after heat builds up
spontaneously.
B. Equipment tested
Collection System #3
Mikro D Pulsaire filter w/reverse jet cleaning
Serial No. 69H232
Type 100S 8.20
Air flow rate - 13,000 cfm
Air/cloth ratio 14/1
Bags: polypropylene felt (Mikro style 17406)
Fan size: 60MW
41 B. HP
1201 RPM-
Motor: 50HP
1750 RPM
C. Discussion of Test
During test run #1, #2 yellow milo with 5% broken kernels
and foreign material (BCFM) and 13% moisture content, was transferred
from one bin to another. The conveyor belts in the tunnel are numbered
5, 6 and 7. Grain was carried only on belt #5 at about 13000#/minute
(390T/hr). The milo weighed about 57.5 Ib/bu. The first bin was
emptied at 10:05 a.m. There was no flow on the belt for about 2 minutes
while the operator switched to another bin.
-------
During test run #2, also, #2 yellow mi To was transferred
from one bin to another on belt #5. Grain flow on the belt was
about 13000 Ib/min.
During test run #3, the flow of #2 yellow milo on belt
#5 was about 13500 Ib/min.
Test run #4 was conducted from 8:55 a.m. until 10:30 a.m.,
January 11, 1973. The flow of #2 yellow milo on belt #5 averaged
11,200 Ib/min.
Test run #5 was conducted from 11:05 a.m. until 12:25 p.m.
on January 11, 1973. During the test, #1 hard winter wheat was trans-
ferred from one bin to another.
There were no visible emissions at anytime during the tests.
D. Process Data
Test run
1
2
3
4
5
1HH 0.2 12.0
1HH 0.15 13.2
Material
Yellow mi
Yellow
Yellow
Yellow
Hard wi
mi
mi
mi
lo
lo
lo
lo
nter
Grade
#2
#2
#2
#2
wheat !YH
%FM
5
5
5
5
0.15
%\\
1
1
1
3
3
3
13
12
.7
Process
1 b/mi n
13000
13000
13500
11200
12200
rate
tons/hr
390
390
405
336
366
-------
APPENDIX E
ANALYTICAL DATA
-------
EEI LABORATORY DATA
PROBE (Total) ACETONE
Volume of Sample, ml
Final. Wt. of Beaker, g.
Initial Wt. of Beaker, g.
Wt. of Residue, g.
(-)Beaker Blank, g. (-)
Wt. of Resideu
(-)Soluvent Blank (-)
(Corrected for Sample Volume)
Corrected Wt. of Sample, g.
FRONT-HALF (Total) H20
Volume of Sample, ml
Final Wt. of Beaker, g. 1
(-)Initial Wt. of Beaker, g 1
Wt. of Residue
(-)Beaker Blank, g (-)
Wt. of Residue, g
(-)Solvent Blank (-)
#1
124
65.4049
65.4007
0.0042
0.0012
0.0030
0.0026
0.0004
#1
655
15.7263
15.7150
0.0113
0.0012
0.0101
0.0039
#2
82
101.0602
101.0568
0.0034
0.0012
0.0022
0.0017
0.0005
#2
556
104.6304
104.6208
0.0096
0.0012
0.0084
0.0033
Run #
#3
122
85.5197
85.5157
0.0040
0.0012
0.0028
0.0026
0.0002
#3
500
148.8509
148.8452
0.0057
0.0012
0.0045
0.0030
#4
286
90.6697
90.3510
0.3187
0.0012
0,3175
0.0060
0.3115
#4
510
149.2793
149.2748
0.0045
0.0012
0.0033
0.0031
#5
114
88.1292
88.1248
. 0.0044
0.0012
0.0032
0.0024
0.0008
#5
577
150.1017
150.0943
0.0074
0.0012
0.0062
0.0035
(Corrected for Sample Volume)
Corrected Wt. of Sample, g. 0.0062 0.0051 . 0.0015 0.0002 0.0027
-------
EEI LABORATORY DATA (Cont'd)
BACK-HALF (Total) ACET
Volume of Sample, ml
Final Wt. of Beaker, g
Initial Wt. of Beaker,
Wt. of Residue
(-)Beaker Blank, g
Wt. of Residue
(-)Salvent Blank, G
(Corrected for Sample
Corrected Wt. of Samp!
BLANKS
Volume of Sample, ml
Final Wt. of Beaker, g
Initial Wt. of Beaker,
(-)Beaker Blank
Corrected Wt
ONE
#1
122
112.6146
g. (-)112.6050
0.0096
.(-) 0.0012
0.0084
(-) 0.0026
Volume)
e, g. 0.0058
ACETONE
100
98.5538
g. (-)98.5505
0.0033
(-) 0.0012
0.0021
Run#
#2 #3
57 178
146.3437 150.8597
146.3332 150.8509
0.0105 0.0088
0.0012 0.0012
0.0093 0.0076
0.0012 0.0037
0.0081 0.0039
.WATER
100
149.7052
149.7034
0.0018
0.0012
0.0006
#4
251
147.6111
147.6035
0.0076
0.0012
0.-0064
0.0053
0.0011
BEAKER
150.2129
150.2117
0.0012
0.0012
#5
160
136.4617
136.4546
UO-.0071
0.0012
0.0059
0.0034
0.0025
-------
ANALYTICAL DATA
PLANT.
DATE_
SAMPLING LOCATION _
SAMPLE TYPE __Xi
RUN NUMBER L
SAMPLE BOX NUMBER,
CLEAN-UP MAN
COMMENTS:
FRONT HALF
ACETONE WASH OF NOZZLE, PROBE, CYCLONE (BYPASS),
FLASK, FRONT HALF OF FILTER HOLDER
FILTER NUMBER
LABORATORY RESULTS
CONTAINER.
CONTAINER 1
FRONT HALF SUBTOTAL
mg
.mg
0,3
BACK HALF
IMPINGER CONTENTS AND V/ATER WASH OF
IMPINGERS, CONNECTORS, AND BACK
HALF OF FILTER HOLDER
ACETONE WASH OF IMPINGERS, CONNECTORS,
. AND BACK HALF OF FILTER HOLDER
MOISTURE
mNTAINFR S-13-c-oB-O-'- "3
ETHER-CHLOROFORM
EXTRAH"inN
CONTAINER S-^"'"0-5 OC'3-B
BACK HALF SUBTOTAL
TOT/M WFIRHT
fc.^ mg
mg
b- o mg
'3« O mg
|^5F^r mg
ii a.
IMPINGERS
FiNfti vni IIMF .0 «
INITIAL VOLUME -'
NFT VOI i|MP
SILICA GEL T'.?.rr
FINAL Vi'FIGHT
INITIAL V,'FIRHT " /
NET WEIGHT
EPA (Our) 231
4/72
? ml
,- ml
--- ml
' g B
' "'^ g E
"' g E
E
E
B:
TOTAL MOISTURE 2//-f)
-------
ANALYTICAL DATA
PLANT.
DATE_
SAMPLING LOCATION.
SAMPLE TYPE /#?.
RUN NUMBER £
SAMPLE BOX NUMBER.
CLEAN-UP MAN
.-X,
COMMENTS:
FRONT HALF
ACETONE WASH OF NOZZLE, PROBE, CYCLONE (BYPASS),
FLASK, FRONT HALF OF FILTER HOLDER
FILTER NUMBER *w W
CONTAINER^
CONTAINER B-
LABORATORY RESULTS
0«£" mg
.mg
FRONT HALF SUBTOTAL
mg
BACK HALF
IMPINGER CONTENTS AND WATER WASH OF
IMPINGERS, CONNECTORS, AND BACK
HALF OF FILTER HOLDER
ACETONE WASH OF IMPINGERS, CONNECTORS,
AND BACK HALF OF FILTER HOLDER
CONTAINER BL-
ETHER-CHLOROFORM
EXTRACTION
CONTAINER;
.mg
.mg
.mg
BACK HALF SUBTOTAL
13.
TOTAL WEIGHT
mg
MOISTURE
IMPINGERS
FINAL VOLUME
INITIAL VOLUME
. NET VOLUME
SILICA GEL U?r?
FINAL WEIGHT
INITIAL WEIGHT
NET WEIGHT
EPA (Dur) 231
4/72
ml
ml
ml
g
g
g:
TOTAL MOISTURE 2P-
-------
ANALYTICAL DATA
PLANT.
DATE_
SAMPLING LOCATION '?>**"-(*.'
SAMPLE TYPE X?W^-
RUN NUMBER _ 2
SAMPLE BOX NUMBER
CLEAN-UP MAN
COMMENTS:
FRONT HALF
ACETONE WASH OF NOZZLE, PROBE, CYCLONE (BYPASS), CONTAINER.
FLASK, FRONT HALF OF FILTER HOLDER
FILTER NUMBER cv-Qo^t-. CONTAINER
LABORATORY RESULTS
Q.Z. mg
O mg
FRONT HALF SUBTOTAL
G ,~L- mg
BACK HALF
IMPINGER CONTENTS AND WATER V/ASH OF
IMPINGERS, CONNECTORS, AND BACK
HALF OF FILTER HOLDER
ACETONE WASH OF IMPINGERS, CONNECTORS,
AND BACK HALF OF FILTER HOLDER
MOISTURE
CONTAINER
ETHER-CHLOROFORM
EXTRACTION
CONTAINER.
o.. -\ I -ov -3 -O> O- 3
BACK HALF SUBTOTAL
TOTAL WEIGHT
IMPINGERS
FINAL VOLUME
INITIAL VOLUME
NET VOLUME
SILICA GEL" 2/|
FINAL WEIGHT
INITIAL WEIGHT
NET WEIGHT
EPA (Dur) 231
4/72
203 ml
i (. '; ml
':;'< ml
' O
"'"""" g g
--*''' g g
'-" '''' S E
e
E
H:
TOTAL MOISTURE
I S" mg
mg
JL_fL_mg
5.4
mg
-------
ANALYTICAL DATA
PLANT
SAMPLING LOCATION
SAMPLE TYPE
RUN NllMBFR
SAMPLE BOX NUMBER
CLEAN-UP MAN
COMMENTS:
FRONT HALF
ACETONE WASH OF NOZZLE, PROBE, CYCLONE (BYPASS),
FLASK, FRONT HALF OF FILTER HOLDER
FILTER NUMBER
LABORATORY RESULTS
CONTAINER *-"?A-00s-0t2-2. 3 11 . S" me
CONTAINER e-
.'l O mg
BACK HALF
IMPINGER CONTENTS AND V/ATER WASH OF
IMPINGERS, CONNECTORS, AND BACK
HALF OF FILTER HOLDER
ACETONE WASH OF IMPINGERS, CONNECTORS,
AND BACK HALF OF FILTER HOLDER
MOISTURE
IMPINGERS
FINAL VOLUME .
INITIAL VOLUME,
_ml
i_ml
_ml
SILICA GEL * 28$
FINAL WEIGHT 2£
INITIAL WEIGHT ^-':'-:', / g
NET WEIGHT /'"'. "'' g
EPA (Dur) 231
4/72
FRONT HALF SUBTOTAL
TOTAL MOISTURE
mNTAINFR 3 -13 x?os~^-3
ETHER-CHLOROFORM
pnmiNpRS^Voos^.s,s
BACK HALF SUBTOTAL
TfVrAI WFIRHT
<5. Z me
- - mg
1 . 1 mg
\ 3 mg
? j ~> o
^4-^L^~Qf mg
-» -x c*
=> I -> . _>
-------
ANALYTICAL DATA
PLANT
DATF
COMMENTS:
-//-? 3
SAMPLING LOCATION
SAMPLE TYPE /
RUN NUMBER -5
SAMPLE BOX NUMBER
CLEAN-UP I
FRONT HALF
ACETONE WASH OF NOZZLE, PROBE, CYCLONE (BYPASS), CONTAINER
FLASK, FRONT HALF OF FILTER HOLDER
FILTER NUMBER OOOS3O ________ CONTAINER
LABORATORY RESULTS
--2 O.g me
FRONT HALF SUBTOTAL
l.o
mg
BACK HALF
IMPINGER CONTENTS AND WATER WASH OF
IIK1PINGERS, CONNECTORS, AND BACK
HALF OF FILTER HOLDER
ACETONE WASH OF IMPINGERS, CONNECTORS,
AND BACK HALF OF FILTER HOLDER
ETHER-CHLOROFORM
BACK HALF SUBTOTAL
TOTAL
.mg
.
mg
3.2- mg
MOISTURE
IMPINGERS
FINAL VOLUME
SILICA GEL
FINAL WEIGHT
INITIAL WEIGHT
NET WEIGHT
EPA (Dur) 231
4/72
~
INITIAL VOLUME 7^
NET VOLUME
ml
ml
ml
g
g
g;
TOTAL MOISTURE 2'/> /
-------
APPENDIX F
FIELD TEST LOG
-------
FIELD TEST LOG
January 4, 1973
January 5, 1973
January 8, 1973
January 9, 1973
January 10, 1973
January 11, 1973
Arrived San Francisco, California
11:00 pm EST
Met Mr. Farr at Grain Terminal
Purchased materials to build stack and
began construction of same
Purchased remainder of hardware
Worked on stack construction - rain
prevented its erection
Erected stack and prepared to test
Began testing - three tests conducted
Finished final two tests and shipped
equipment back to Gainesville
-------
APPENDIX G
PROJECT PARTICIPANTS
-------
PROJECT PARTICIPANTS
Environmental Engineering, Inc.
Jack Riggenbach Project Manager
Bob Durgan, Senior Technician Environmental Specialist
Larry Wurts, Senior Technician Environmental Specialist
Environmental Protection Agency
Thomas E. Hard Project Test Officer
Ken Woodard Project Engineer
Roy Neulicht Engineer
Bob Vollaro Engineer
------- |