EPA Project Report No. 73-SFA-3#
CD
AIR POLLUTION
EMISSION TEST
O
INTERIM REPORT
MISSISSIPPI CHEMICAL CORPORATION
PASCAGOULA, MISSISSIPPI
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Office of Air and Waste Management
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Emission Measurement Branch
, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
-------
P.O. Box 13454 •UNIVERSITY STATION • GAINESVILLE, FLORIDA 32604 • 904/372-3318
environmental science and engineering? inc.
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
73-011-026
•W*ONMWTAL SOENCCS *fff*tMCt €«VWOWM€KTAL CTGWEEBMG
werfOftotOGY Am QUALITY MAMAGCMEHT
WtOUATK BiOLOGY DtStvaStOH MOOfUHG
fISHffttfS BIOLOGY OCfAffOGftAfHY
fOLU/TlON BlQASSAYS COASTAL CN&NCffttNG
WLOUfC fCOLOGY HYDROLOGY
f QTANY GtOLOGY
fHfWSTftY GEOLOGICAL ENGINffRtNG
WtA&QCHCMtSTHY WASTfWATf* MANAQCMfNT
\tOS7ATISTICS SOttD WASH MANAGfMENJ
THVMOHMCtfrAL CCOMOMKS OCCUPATIONAL SAffTY/HEALTH
SOURCE TEST REPORT
MEASUREMENT OF SULFUR DIOXIDE EMISSIONS
MISSISSIPPI CHEMICAL CORPORATION
PASCAGOULA, MISSISSIPPI
FOR
THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
REPORT NO. 73-SFA-3
Contract No. 68-02-0232, Task No. 26
Robert S. Sholtes, Ph.D., P.E.
Senior Advisor
John R. Dollar
Project Manager
January 1974
OFFICE/LABORATORY LOCATION: FIVE MILES WEST OF INTERSTATE 75 ON STATE ROAD 26 (NEWBERRY ROAD)
-------
SOURCE TEST REPORT
REPORT NO: 73-SFA-3
PLANT TESTED: Mississippi Chemical Corporation
Pascagoula, Mississippi
EMISSIONS FROM: No. 2 Sulfuric Acid Plant
TESTOR: Environmental Science and Engineering, Inc.
Post Office Box 13454
University Station
Gainesville, Florida 32604
CONTRACT NO: 68-02-0232, Task Order No. 26
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1
2.0 INSTALLATION AND OPERATION OF CONTINUOUS MONITORING
SYSTEMS 2
3.0 SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION OF RESULTS 8
4.0 PROCESS DESCRIPTION AND OPERATION 21
5.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES 22
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A-l. COMPLETE EPA METHOD NO. 8 SULFUR DIOXIDE
RESULTS
APPENDIX A-2. COMPLETE DUPONT ANALYZER SULFUR DIOXIDE
RESULTS
APPENDIX B-l. EPA METHOD NO. 8 FIELD DATA SHEETS
APPENDIX B-2. SULFUR DIOXIDE CALIBRATION GAS FIELD DATA
SHEETS
APPENDIX C-l. EPA METHOD NO. 8 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL
PROCEDURES
APPENDIX C-2. DUPONT ANALYZER SAMPLING PROCEDURES
APPENDIX D-l. EPA METHOD NO. 8 LABORATORY DATA
APPENDIX D-2. SULFUR DIOXIDE CALIBRATION GAS LABORATORY
DATA
APPENDIX E. TEST LOG
APPENDIX F. PROJECT PARTICIPANTS
-1-
environmental science and engineering* inc.
-------
1.0 INTRODUCTION
As part of the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Continuous Moni-
toring Project, sulfur dioxide emission tests were performed by
Environmental Science and Engineering, Inc. (ESE) on the No. 2 sulfuric
acid plant located at the Mississippi Chemical Corporation (MCC) in
Pascagoula, Mississippi.
The purpose of the tests was to evaluate the performance specifications
of the continuous sulfur dioxide measurement system. Requirements for
continuous monitoring and recording of sulfur dioxide emissions from
acid plants have previously been published by the EPA in the Federal
Register (Volume 36, No. 247, Subpart H, Section 60.84, December 23,
1971, Washington, D.C.).
Sulfur dioxide emissions were determined by simultaneously using two
EPA Method No. 8 sampling trains (see Federal Register mentioned above).
While the manual sulfur dioxide tests were being performed, a DuPont
continuous analyzer was measuring the sulfur dioxide concentration of
the effluent stack gases. The comparative testing program was con-
ducted on September 11, 12, and 13, 1973, while the plant was operating
normally. For the remainder of the six-month study, data from the DuPont
analyzer will be recorded continuously on a Leeds and Northrup strip
recorder and a Westinghouse ADVISER magnetic tape recorder.
-1-
environmental science and engineering, inc.
-------
2.0 INSTALLATION AND OPERATION OF CONTINUOUS MONITORING SYSTEMS
In this program a magnetic tape recording system directly computer
compati bl e, was installed upon existing sulfur dioxide monitoring equip-
ment at the subject plant. This equipment was manufactured by Westing-
house Electric Corporation, and basically is an adaptation of power de-
mand metering equipment used by the electric power industry for con-
sumption reporting purposes. The equipment used has the capability of
recording three channels of data per recording unit, however, only two
were used in this installation. The equipment is based upon the
Westinghouse Model WR4C recording device with appropriate input signal
conditioning equipment to make it compatible with the existing S0£
monitor. The monitor installed at the plant for S02 measurements was
a DuPont Model 460 sulfur dioxide monitor which is based upon the ab-
sorption of ultra violet radiation by S02- This equipment has proven
to be quite reliable and accurate in use by others throughout the acid
manufacturing and other S02 generating industries.
The recording equipment was installed as pictured in the block diagram
of Figure 1. As can be seen, it was set up essentially in a manner
placing it in parallel with an existing stripchart recorder of Leeds &
Northrop manufacturer. Inasmuch as the Dupont-L&N set-up was already
in existence at the time this program was begun, it was a very simple
matter to add the Westinghouse recording equipment and did not involve
any modification to the existing installation or significant additions
-2-
environmental science and engineering, inc.
-------
Effluent Stack
DuPont Probe
u>
I
Heated Teflon Sample Line
DuPont
S02
Analyzer
0-1Omv
Signal
Plant Control Room
r
—i
Strip
Chart
Recorder
L.
Figure 1 . Schematic Diagram of Measurement and Recording System
-------
in order to accomplish the purpose. The only physical manipulations
required were that of physically installing the Westinghouse equipment
in the acid plant control room, thereafter, running a signal pickup line
to the existing Leeds & Northrop recorder where the S02 signal was
picked up at the input of said recorder.
In an effort to simultaneously record plant operating level, a second
channel of the Westinghouse system was adapted to the measurement of the
main blower discharge pressure. For short time periods (day to day)
this variable provides an adequate indication of variation in plant out-
put. It is not very .good for long-term indications due to back pressure
changes due, in particular, to catalyst contamination. The installed
plant instrumentation.which measures this variable, provides a pneumatic
signal to the control room. For purposes of adapting this to the
Westinghouse recorder, a potentiometric pressure transducer was installed
and excited by a regulated one volt power source. As the pressure
signals varied in the pneumatic system, a corresponding change in the
electrical signal was therefore produced and used for magnetic tape
recording purposes.
A Samuel-Moore 1/4-inch heated teflon sample line and a DuPont stainless
steel probe were installed for transferring the gas from the top of the
stack to the DuPont analyzer. The sample line was heated to a temperature
of 210°F, and was automatically maintained at that temperature by an
Athena Controls, Inc. solid state temperature controller.
environmental science and engineering, inc.
-------
A schematic diagram of the sulfuric acid plant effluent stack, and the
DuPont probe are shown in Figures 2 and 3 respectively.
-5-
environmental science and engineering, inc.
-------
32V
43'
6'
40"
DuPont S02
271 Analyzer-^
29'
Stack I.D. = 102"
Demister
39"*- S02 samples were taken
at this level (manual
and continuous). 4
sample ports @ 90° and
2 sample ports @ 90°.
Meter boxes for manual
•*• S02 tests were set up
at this level
Figure 2. Schematic Diagram of No. 2 H2S04 Plant Outlet Stack
-6-
-------
,: < G2'.-^
f brefei
to I c*i
PILTER PROBS REPLACEMENT
aO WUCRON,
PART v^O.<«.0007-90^
1
I
9
- '
.
r. < '
PART wo.
-905
OTMERWI5F NOltD
.1 too ANCtti - 0 W
Ml* .001 TMOlUNC lAVOtt*
».»CH V.IP »>*'. •.•,-ijmr
MAC". C.AI. CONtttfltit WltwlH OlOtll
;
^-5^r
iiioVo '""
VJO
DAH 1 -^rn •"• ,Tp-^ t i cu rc-n c( Nri-cvfi » co. i"Ci
_— j (J'Uri!:iJJ iNitritmiJi rsooucts DIVISION
•--5--j^^7%1Tt/^£lV^Ei: /
! c |t>AO'"0'46O!O7
.55X.
Figure 3. DuPont Stainless Steel Sampling Probe
-------
3.0 SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION OF RESULTS
Table 1 summarizes the actual performance specifications of the con-
tinuous sulfur dioxide measurement system. Complete data are included
in Appendix A-Z. Definitions of the specifications evaluated for the
continuous measurement system are as follows:
Measurement System - The total equipment required for the determination
of a pollutant gas concentration in a given source effluent. The
system consists of three major subsystems:
1) Sampling Interface - That portion of the measurement
system that performs one or more of the following
operations: delineation, acquisition, transportation,
and conditioning of a sample of the source effluent.
2) Analyzer - That portion of the system which senses the
pollutant gas and generates a signal output that is a
function of the pollutant concentration.
3) Data Presentation - That portion of the measurement
system that provides a display of the output signal
in terms of concentration units.
Span - The value of pollutant concentration at which the measurement
system is set to produce the maximum data display output. For the
purposes of this method, the span shall be set at a sulfur dioxide
concentration of 1000 ppm by volume.
-8-
environmental science and engineering, inc.
-------
Accuracy (Relative) - The degree of correctness with which the measure-
ment system yields the value of gas concentration of a sample relative
to the value given by a defined reference method. This accuracy is
expressed in terms of error which is the difference between the paired
concentration measurements. The error is expressed as a percentage of
full scale span of the measurement system.
Calibration Error - The difference between the pollutant concentration
indicated by the measurement system and the known concentration of the
test gas mixture.
Zero Drift - The change in measurement system output over a stated
period of time of normal continuous operation when the pollutant con-
centration at the time of the measurements is zero.
Calibration Drift - The change in measurement system output over a
stated period of time of normal continuous operation when the pollutant
concentration at the time of the measurements is the same known upscale
value.
Repeatability - A measure of the measurement system's ability to give
the same output reading(s) upon repeated measurements of same pollutant
concentration(s).
Response Time - The time interval from a step change in pollutant con-
centration at the input to the measurement system to the time at which
-9-
environmental science and engineering, inc.
-------
95% of the corresponding final value is reached asvdisplayed on the
measurement system data presentation device.
Tables 2 through 10 summarize the sulfur dioxide emissions obtained
by the EPA-8 Method and the DuPont analyzer for the same time intervals,
Complete data are included in Appendix A-l.
On the average, the DuPont analyzer sulfur dioxide concentration was
about 24 ports per million lower than the EPA-8 Method sulfur dioxide
concentrations.
-10-
environntental science and engineering, inc.
-------
TABLE 1
ACTUAL PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE
CONTINUOUS MEASURE SYSTEM
Relative Accuracy
it ii
Calibration Error
Zero Drift
Zero Drift
Calibration Drift
H H
Repeatability
Response Time
(Train "A")
(Train "B")
(45PPM)
(245PPM)
(446PPM)
(2 Hours)
(18 Hours)
(2 Hours)
(14 Hours)
(45PPM)
(245PPM)
(446PPM)
Mean Difference, %
1.9 (Maximum)
2.8
0.3
2.3
0.3
0.04
0.4
0.1
0.6
0.2
0.4
0.1
1.7 minutes (Maximum)
95% Confidence Interval, %
+ 2.4
+ 2.3
+ 0.6
+ 0.8
+ 0.8
+ 0.5
_ 2-5
+ 1.6
Mean +_ 3.8
+ 0.
+ 0,
Mean
.7
.9
+ 0.9
(Maximum)
-------
TABLE ?
^ ^r* s ^ T) A *** t
TEST NO - 73-SFA-3-
PLA11T - COASTAL CHEM. CORP.
SOURCE - DEMISTER STACK
TYPE OF PLANT - SULFUBIC ACID PLANT
CONTROL EQUIPMENT - DUAL ADSORPTION
POLLUTANTS SAMPLED - SOI
NUMBER • 1 IA 1 12 1
3)T!W BFGA11 l-JU-iJiJS L-JiI.lH.5 1.
5)BAROMFTRIC PP.ESSUPV, 177 KG ll2al£aIII""IIl29*fiIIIIIl!
6)METER ORIFICE PRESSURE DROP, IN H20 1 D-£2_I -1 lIll3_HIHL
7)T/Oi £/?y GAS METFl? COHV., CUBIC FE^T l3j2, '""
B)AVFPAGF GAS VETFP. TF.VPFPATURF,, DF,r. F J[~9]
3)VOL DRY GAS, S. T. P.. CUBIC FEET J.""]j:
1Q)TOTAT, U20 COLLECTED, ML J.~6" 1-5^.5 1.
1DVOL -H20 VAPOR COLLECTED , S. T. P. Ctf. F i:L_0.1>.Bj~ I_l_0j.263 1.
12)52^*: GAS MOISTURE, PERCENT VOLUMF 1 o79 |"*0.8_ ^i"
13)ASSUMED STAC!'. GAS MOISTURE, PCT VOL l""0~C I"I~lI5^_I _i"
H'r)PFP.CENT C02 J~I I-I—l I__II__1.
15)PeRCENT 02 1 1 __1.
1G )PFRCFNT CO 1-1 ~_ 1.
1T)PEPCENT N2 lIIIIIIIIIIIlI~IIIIII_Il!
18)PF/?C",V!T EXCESS AIR L.2.II II II-- I 1.
19)MOLECULAP. HEIGHT OF STACV. GAS, DRY. l""IEIE^~I~I~ I I^^I81~_ II
2Q)MOIE.CULAR VEIWT OF STACK GAS, STK COVD]^?* ~§"" TI5"^7"6"!!"-!!
2-i)SI'ACK GAS SPECIFIC GRAVITY l-^'E^"" I T_C"I5'5"I Hi.
22)/iW? SQUARE ROOT (VZL HEAD), IN H20 lI5'I£^IIIIIII0'~5'^E_I-Il!
23)AVF.KAGE STACK GAS TEMPEflATVRE, PEG F ll1"61'HIIIIlI1"5"?! II-Il!
2^")AVG SQUARE ROOT (STK TEMP*VEL HEAD) II3"5'~5"l~_II_T_rZ' 7^~I 1.
25)PITOT CORRECTION FACTOR ll5""5"5™!"! | _°"~^3" ~_I I
2&)STACK PRESSURE, Iff HG, ABSOLUTE j_~2~9"r8~9~-~ "I'^^'^^T
2T)STACK GAS VEL, STACK COND, F. P. M. 1 r5~JT.~8~ _ | JTT77T j_
28)STACll ARFA, SO FFFT j'S-grTS"""- J_5"GTT5— "j
VE STACK AKSA, SOU ARE FFFT 1 ^ZZZl II.
5. r. p. ,SCFMD LlLiLr I4i~ -1--
TTME OF TEST, MINUTES I °u i^rcr ,
32)SAMPLTNG NOZZLE DIAMETER, INCHES !„-«. 1-
3A) SULFUR DIOXIDE EMISSIONS, PPM
EPA Method No. 8 343 291
DuPont Analyzer " 307 307
-12-
-------
TABLE 3
TEST NO - 73-SFA-3
PLANT - COASTAL CEEM. COPP.
SOURCE - DEMISTER STACK
TYPE OF PLANT - SULFURIC ACID PLANT
CONTROL EQUIPMENT - DUAL ABSORPTION
POLLUTANTS SAMPLED - S02
1 J2J 1 JL3_
2)DATF
3)?J.',T BF.GAP
S)BAPOrT^f*^r^J7tT'* T^T TJ^"1 A7<\f}TJJ^l^~t I ^ y • o j I ^-J^oj
27)S"ACi: Gf.S Vr.lt*STW. C^IJn, F. P. Af. 1 3"ST775" -j_~T5T77
2B)STflCZ AREA, SO FFFT ill^lj^l_l_ll^l^
og) r^1^irtr"T1"T''r' SmAC:' Ar)r't> SOU^PF FTfT 1 • ^ I * !
Tn^-Vr-'"r'^ v-or/'nyj'r.r"'- "r,"'„ ""rr^Mn t—8-6-7ZT 7-8-6-2T3- i
J0;ij^,i(..- (;-.••..-• i'ijJi. .• n fH TT * * 7f /T T1 IT* T f r*T 7 * IT " * 7 7 'H T^-*^ |O\J iDVJ I
O » y " - • — ^ • C' *J —. • • J. t* ••• -• fcJ * !
gg^J^i^^^tt^^^'11''7^ "' e . J' CT "^ J-7T7 j-9-5- 7
34) SULFUR DIOXIDE EMISSIONS, PPM
EPA Method No. 8 342 341
DuPont Analyzer "" 300 300
***.;. T,
70
-13-
-------
TABLE 4
TEST NO - 73-SFA-3
PLANT - COASTAL CHEM. CORP.
SOURCE - DEMISTER STACK
TyPE OF PLANT - SULFURIC ACID PLANT
CONTROL EQUIPMENT - DUAL ABSORPTION
POLLUTANTS SAMPLED - S02
I ___
17 )
H)TIUE £77 P
S)BAPO'
-------
TABLE 5
TEST NO - 73-SFA-3
PLANT - COASTAL CHEMICAL COUP.
SOURCE - DEMISTER STACK
TYPE OF PLANT - SULFUHIC ACID PLANT
CONTROL EQUIPMENT - DUAL ABSORPTION
POLLUTANTS SAMPLED - SOI
2)^/*"?r!?
3)^7.'^ T>Ftr,A.r
H)?Tft£ ~;;r)
5)BAPO'f~TP:IC PP.FSSUP", 1*7 US
6)'Tr?*D OPT?IC~ 'TSSUPF. DP.OP, I'J H20
ir/OL DP? GAS rrr?rr. co :,")., c '/.*?''? FITS*
B j/.y^^/f**' Gx?5 'f.r~'"?. TT'".pr?flT'jp.r,t .nr/^ r
9)707, "PI 64S. -~. T. ?., Ct/.?jr ?Er?
10)ro^;7. .720 COLLFC'S^D, r'L
11)7^7, :'2f> 7JT"0"> CO^L-cr^n, 5. m. P. Ct/
1° )£"/"" (7^7 •'pr5^fnr' prpr-p*"" '/OLU''^
13 )/iJJi;.'T" STf-Cr. C-f.S "0!5T~J~7,t P^~ VOL
1U )Prpf" T CiT2
1 5 )PT:irrr7 .T 02
16 )prpr? •? CO
lajp.^pr." T z?;rr*"i*r AJ^
19 )'.'t?L">c •1jJ/.."' .vrj-^^r OF -srJ.f7' i7^j, p"1:.'
20)>'07/r:'r^I-/.r. '-Eir.^T OF Sl'tri: GAS, ST'r Cf
22)AVG S^UAP" F.QP? (*/~L .?!"•."), 7." "20
"•3 ) I1'"71/ '"^ S^'iT (7'J «r"73r-"/".vr>r r^^/7 ^
24),!7<7 so"fp.v PPP? (5r." ""."px".7"!, rr--n)
o r* N "*j *r r~t /^ r*; *^ *^\ *^ 7^ ^ x^ -^ T* /^ • i ^ f s^ ^ s} ^
O) C \ '^ '""^ >! /^ '*' "^ "^ ^ C^ f^ " 7 O ™^* "^ 7 ' ^.T ^ il T7 ^ O ^ f ' ^** "T*
*- D / *_' A • • ' ' .' - « '' - ' ••* t* " m -. . . . t/ • /I . - t-< \ i> >^ ^
27)5r/;CA' G/!S 7"L , JT/T" C10""" P. ?„ ''.
28)jrj./!c;: A.TJ. 50 rr^r
29 )Z77?::'"rrrT'^ j?-i^:' /•">".'. ori/'-1?"" FF~F
f3f\\ct~i^n'f /^ ' £? T^rOr? "^4*~trl '? *"* ^? r'/^T*"^
O \J ) O u. ,-. v - • (. T .' : *^ ^ AJ ^ i • . . .• { j. 9 •-< • — t *. « t *^ *•'
32)SA'TLr''0- r.OZZL" DIA-rTTP, II-O^FS
34) SULFUR DIOXIDE EMISSIONS, PPM
EPA Method No. 8
Dupont Analyzer
1 «m 1 JUL 1
I I i
I i_n_. -iA. ! i_p.-tf I
!T-1-1-^ ! 11:^1 1
i-l/U 1 -IP- -, !
1 n R^ ' P-fi !
1 9ft ..no o ! J^I^Jinj !
1 ! ~ - 1
I n fl f^ ! g q C *
£• 'TT 1 n 9 ii ' Q_»_2i_ -
ijL P ' _9rJ _ _ ! .T_
1 0.8 i 0^8 '
'1 1 1 _ .
1 ! - !
1 ___ i !
L2&~£5 ' 23^£5 j
"*:'5.l23*.l£ 1-.2.B...1G 1
' 5*Ji£2 1 0^ jf£j2 !
1 ^ go i l^_g 1
lll-.2Sii - !_lij.JZi4 _ i
l£^.S3. • OjiJ2J2 '
1^0 ' ^0 !
ll2U2«.l ! 1?£2 '
1,5 £.^2.5.— L_5£j.2^ _ '
15S...1S. _ 1 5G.25 1 _
lS.iQ.tLl ! 8^056 1
160 _! 62 _l . _ _
lii^l ! 9CJ.2 ~1 _ -
377 340
325 325
.". --»•?.•::•. 7n -~~.
-15-
-------
TABLE 6
T>f,?«
TEST NO - 73-SFA-3
PLANT - COASTAL CHEMICAL CORP.
SOURCE - DEMISTER STACK
TYPE OF PLANT - SULFURIC ACID PLANT
CONTROL EQUIPMENT - DUAL ABSORPTION
POLLUTANTS SAMPLED - S02
1-9./.L2.Z.L3. J.-a./.-l?.7-1.3. i
i-1
1-3.CL
ll:
_3JL.
S^FS""^/? PP.ZSSUP", Ii! «G
O'TTFP oniFicF. PP.FSSU^F. DP.OP, 1:1 mo
J._3_2—12JL
8 )AVFPAC-F GAS ''FT^F TF"PFF.ATL'^.F. t D^r.
9)I'0L npj GAS, J. T. ?.. Cu?J-7 FET
10).?or/if, "20 CPLLoCl.''^^, .'.'L i_5
ll)7rt.r, .720 7^.P0? CniLT.TF.n, S. T. P. CU FmJ._Q
1^}/7r"l/;/"*?F fl £ *7 *'pTCrnfTr>/^£:"?" "2
.
/ i^ ri J. i .
^L^CULP.r. ."TJ^'T 0F STA^'-'. GAS,
''
23
*5O\-^-^—)/"»7^?-.77 ir'f^/?"T'"7T^'~T^/^
O O ^ i .' _' '. ** • ; • -i. ^. *.>»'/-..• .' .' J. _ • •
3A) SULFUR DIOXIDE EMISSIONS, PPM
EPA Method No. 8
Dupont Analyzer
1
iJL
l_2ja.jai.
i_Q.w5JL9_.
i_Q.w8_3. iJLJL3_.
LJLa^UL.
_6_Q_.
350
320
327
320
'. • -->.'.•.- • • . •
-16-
-------
TABLE 7
TEST 110 - 73-SFA-3
PLANT - COASTAL CHEMICAL CORP.
SOURCE - DEHISTER STACK
T!PE OF PLAUT - SULFUR1C ACID PQANT
CONTROL EQUIPMENT - DUAL ABSORPTION
POLLUTAIITS SAMPLED - SOI
1 &£..
i__JL/12jC7_3__l_JI
3)T.'?r P.EGAt7 J
UP.*, 777 "0 1 ID i_JiJL__
G)'.T?~F ORIFICE PP.ES3U?L DP.OP, J77 520 1 0_,.7.6_ i_ Q.JLL
7)70L PI?!' ff/iS 'T^r-7 007.TT7., C'J3~? FIT21 lIIjU-JSLOlI-Iil"
8)y5.7FrMOF ox?s -.TrT rF'.'pr.-1^?:'.1?.7:. ?r^ r 1 jUf-j* 1_
9)rOI, DPY GAS, 5. T. ?. , C'J?.ir. FE"T 1~
H'Of, 7/20 74P"? CniLrr.TT.n, 5. T. P. CU Fml 3^35 j._
lor/r1?: c.45 :'OJ5rr'r':r', -pr.p.cE*7? VOLU-'* i J?jJ_I_II_l_
uloJ:''7'^" STf-^'' Gf.S "rir3TU"Ft ?rr 7^7- I 0.8 i"^§
iiiiniiiiiiii :
i i
i i
17 )P^r'T'72' '72 1 1
ia)?F?or"" zzrr'ss Air. lIIoII_I_I_IiI3 '.
IWCLFC'JLAP. .VF7r?:T OF 5?.40-' !^tOL"ryi/ip ;.;z:ir:"r OF jr/r:- GAS, STI: ^7'.T5iI_28J.76_I I_JLS^
21)0^/4^:: 0/.5 SPECIFIC GP.f-.VTT? l_Iol99l_II_"i"_J)^JJ i
22),ri'o s^w.?r ^oof c'rr, 77F,^). 777 .^20 l_IoIIiII_IIIIj-JJ, I
23')/iiTj7/./7r sr/i"j' c.45 rT7'?r.77/i?:/rir', r-Ei F j. issl I_J.J}JB 1
2u)///'? sfli't?.? ?.oo? (5r;: rr::>px".-'L "r,'n) 111117778 Ii_i2-
25).?rror cto~">F.r/r':r"'o." 7.4^?-°." 1 ~o7s_3~ _ !
26)jr/r:: 'pr.rpsu**1, ir HG, AVSPLV?^ lllso _~1_JU _1
27)sr/'o;: GAS V?L, s^w c«::^, F. ?. ". i._IaIaIa__Ii_J^o->3 1
28)jr/-./?;: /IPFJ, 5n rrrr 1 56..75 l_j£^2i 1
2S)E::'7.F.r7J7.ri J'Z'/iC'" I "T/l , S^t/.^n" FF77F 1 56 t7 5 l.Jjj^JZS 1
30)Sr.40:' 0/5 FLOJ7 P/.T^, J. ". P. ,50*"'" lllislti!! Ii_!§J121-IIIl
3i).v^r rr."7' or .TFsr1, "ir^^^j iIIi!lIIIIIIII_£l II_IIl
32)J.4:fPL77T0 rOZZir. DIAr
-------
TABLE 8
TEST NO - 73-SFA-3
PLANT - COASTAL CHEMICAL CORP.
SOURCE - DEMISTER STACK
TyPE OF PLANT - SULFURIC ACID PLANT
CONTROL EQUIPMENT - DUAL ABSORPTION
POLLUTANTS SAMPLED - SOI
I ! *7 T) I I
l«lLi.U.a i-JULjLHJL i.
4)r.n,fr r;.*P i_L2,UijCL '__L2JLJOL_ -1.
5)iMP0'f;T;?ie •pP.F.SSVP.rt 177 n<7 1 3.0. ! JJJL _ 1
6);.Tr?:p 0775*1 rr ??.ESSU»P DP.OP. j.v F2£ lIo.^i£I™_IIlIjLJLL II.
7 j • L* ij i/-1 .i . 7/ O r. • tx C/1' '' A • 0 \J • i.' ' J* I
!70:r/;7, .Y2? COL
l'rtf, :.'2£ 7.4 P'V
12
4) pmc^rT co 2
ID):
17
1 n
I 0_.j8
II—I
lIIII
JLJ>Ji
.1...
IJL
:Zrr."T OF ST.Afiy. GAS, ST1'_ C^.'r!>
•jr/.r*' pr.~5Sj™r'9 ~r iiGt AF.S'
30 )iS!T.4 f"' ir.-'i? PL5'.' :?.•'! I*.^ t J. !7. i
32)J./l.:.'F7,T7'^ ."'^""L" ,vJ/i''.'72'r.T?, I;
34) 'SULFUR DIOXIDE EMISSIONS, PPM
EPA Method No. 8
DuPont Analyzer
J.JLJL3
JLJIQ
359
390
426
390
->**.; . ^ . . .
_ J.'....
_' -.r * •*
-18-
-------
TABLE 9
TEST NO - 73-SFA-3
PLANT - COASTAL CHEMICAL CORP.
SOURCE - DEMISTER STACK
TyPE OF PLANT - SULFURIC ACID PLANT
CONTROL EQUIPMENT - DUAL ABSORPTION
POLLUTANTS SAMPLED - S02
J_ qyi 3/_73_ i_jyj_3_/J_3__JL
4)TI;!F S"D • \ i_n_. n tj_ _ 1
rn *>r. I "on II~Ii_JLO_
Ot'ET^P OPIFICZ PPFSSUPF DP.OPt J.7 H20 J. ^.J7p_ i 0_,71
7)VOL D32 G/S "Frrj? C0.7T.. CU3~n FP.^T 1
. P. , Ci/.?jr PE.^r 1.JU.JLL3. 1-JJuJJ^—.
i2)5r./irr c^.J :'f>isrir">r', PFP.r.F.^T VOLU:'" i_jCLj3 IIIII1I!9-»J I__.
13 )/io5t-"T" ST/C1."' C-/.5 "OTSTUPF,, PT 7(91. ilj9i§. ~I~I_lIjL8_I
I'OPrPCT" CO2 I~ III_II_!IIIII I 1
* •• ^»^» ^» ^— ••— ^ •• ^— •• •• »L •• ^» ^» ^— •• •• «^ — mmt — ••
1C )^r1^^^1"'? r/0 I I !
' ~ * ' *" J* •••• «v ^ •>• ^ ^ ••.„.*. •.M.^ «BV^^^^ __^«
18)PF?rr"r rA'r-5£- .47" lIZIIIIIIIIII^IIIIIIHl
i9)?*OLrc:'r./;p './riG'*? OF STAC'-'. $zst D^:r I_JLB-^^S l_28^s^ j.
2QyOLr'C'JlAr. ''Eir.r'T OF ofT/./?;: G/>5, J7;f C^;7!?!",^^^ liljJiji i
2i)o^/'t"j: GAS SPFCI^IC GP.AVTTZ llj)^^^ ZI""I"i"I^IHII II
23 )/lVF.p.A.TJ? iS!T/1"'' G.-'.o ?r?'?F.Pfl"I'*?"« r>F1 F J_ ]_6J?_m __ _JL_^^^__ i.
5r;: zr.-px-.-i rr,-^) lIj^jSIII-illalllLIIl
7.4 Tn" 1_^J3J3 i_ Oj.5 3 1
2T)STACK G.fS V^L/STAC"-' C0"^, r. P. ". i""j^I3 11 ~^"^^^71 ~
28)jr/ic;: AT.PA, 5.0 rrrr lIj5£^25lIII.lIIIIIIIIIIl
30 )Sj?A C~' G'-^ ^LOl' n.l;Tr' S " ~ SC~-">T* _L 884B? ~ "" I 88436"""" !
32 )i7" rf?V-~ro 7'C"?,L~> DIA.^TT'^'^ TIT"FS J_""j) ^3 i 0«2^ ~" ~ T
34) SULFUR DIOXIDE EMISSIONS, PPM " * ~"
EPA Method No. 8 375 430
DxiPont Analyzer 395 395
2-I.'.: 2 -;---••;: '^.•:- . ^j -:.- *-v
-19-
-------
TABLE 10
TEST NO - 73-SFA-3
PLANT - COASTAL CHEMICAL CORP.
SOURCE - DEMIST EH STACK
TIPE OF PLANT - SULFURIC ACID PLANT
CONTROL EQUIPMENT - DUAL ABSORPTION
POLLUTAUTS SAMPLED - S02
I I I
JL -£LA- -2-S. — _.
4.-,_-(i/.i-'i/-7ji.--1 q/i "3773 '
_Lfl_:~2Ji_— • 1 it • 9 ^ J.
JL'I.115'""^^^
6)'.TrT?.s? OPIFICE ?.?z7.9si'r?r z?/?£?t i.v £29 i
/7/5 "FTTP C0"~n. t CU^.T FT^T J. ^9 -1 3_ ! JJJ,
8),r/F7MPr £45 VE?^:? r^:.'?r.'i.4r-:';?.7:, ^r^ r ill
9)r9L n-py (745, j. ?. ?., c:;?r/7 FE^ lllj
io)^.or/i7. .72? ccLLZcrri:, "L 1 ^. ^ j_ _5-_s_ _ i
11)1^.0 :i20 VAPV Cr>LL-CT7J^t 5. T. ?. CU Fm\ n.9R ' n. OK i.
J J). fl _ _J.__£L._fi .„ L
I _0,.8 ! 0,8 _ I
ri iii_ii~n ini_~r
i ii . i.
1G)pr?^^ Cn I J_ _[.
17)P^^r-T "2 i 1 .1.
1^)r/^£:7i'/r.;;:r^./iJ-'- — ^- /.«- .-- ^ Q I-0 T-
2oyoL*>c'JLt.r. vzir.**? or STA^- GAS] r,Tif ^:7rUlIj>ju7ji."II_?^j£""I'
2i)5rv4".T: c/j SPTCI^IC GP.AVTTZ i O-_SJL »' D-.9.3 1
i-_Jb3J I_D-J5i 1.
i 1 R ? i 1 R ^ i
*•••-•-•* - — — . . . _..- _..__... -_ , ._ - J..... ^.LLk-i— _ — _ «.*__!._ .^^J*^_.__ ^—..«..
25).?r?r?r ^.-"."ror.-p." rx.Tr.P lIIji,A3—IIIIIjD-1^ IIIL
21)STACy. G.f.5 V?L, J"AC" C°.".:n, F. ?. ". I
29
J_
I fin ! K n !
34) SULFUR DIOXIDE EMISSIONS, PPM
EPA Method No. 8 330 395
DuPont Analyzer 340 340
. . . •• - ^. i — — **> —• ^ i -.— ----.,_ - - ; -*> •— - - ^-i -.--•.- r^t-''^.*,
w* **; . ^ . . . "•->• ..- t ' • ;• - «•' i - J . •• - -. . ••' -. ' _-.?**
-20-
-------
4.0 PROCESS DESCRIPTION AND OPERATION
EPA will supply the data for the acid plant process description and
operation.
-21-
environmental science and engineering, inc.
-------
5.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
5.1 CONTINUOUS METHOD
The DuPont-460 Sulfur Dioxide Analyzer System was evaluated for the
following required performance specifications:
Required EPA Specifications
Parameter
Accuracy (Relative)
Calibration Error
Zero Drift (2 hr)
Zero Drift (24 hr)
Calibration Drift
(2 hr)
Calibration Drift
(24 hr)
Repeatability
Response Time
Operational Period
Mean Value
±10% (Maximum)
±5% (Maximum)
±3% (Maximum)
±5% (Maximum)
±3% (Maximum)
±5% (Maximum)
±2% (Maximum)
5 minutes (Maximum)
168 hours
95% Confidence Level
±20% (Maximum)
±10% (Maximum)
±6% (Maximum)
±10% (Maximum)
±6% (Maximum)
±10% (Maximum)
±4% (Maximum)
Since the DuPont analyzer was already installed prior to this study, the
168-hour conditioning period was not necessary. The Westinghouse Adviser
, Recording System with the magnetic tape cartridge was installed parallel
to the existing strip chart recording system on August 28, 1973.
-22-
environmental science and engineering, inc.
-------
The zero drift test began at 1330 on August 29, 1973, and ended at
0730 on August 30, 1973. Instrument air was prepared in Mississippi
Chemical Corporation's laboratory. The air was injected into the DuPont
analyzer so that the complete system was back-purged.
The calibration test began at 0900 on August 30, 1973, and ended at
2300 on August 30, 1973. The reason for terminating the calibration
test prior to the required 24 hours was because the response of the
DuPont analyzer began to decrease substantially. This decrease was due
to moisture in the system. The moisture entered the system from a
U-tube manometer that was used to monitor the pressure of the calibration
gas entering the analyzer. Some of the manometer water was syphoned
into the system accidently. A schematic diagram of the calibration
system used is shown in Figure 4 -A. As a result of this accident, a
1-liter glass jar was placed in the line just prior to entering the
analyzer for trapping moisture, and also for eliminating the possibility
of exerting too much pressure on the analyzer. A schematic diagram
of the jar is shown in Figure 4 -B.
During the formal 168-hour performance and operational test period,
accuracy (relative), calibration error, repeatability, and response
time were determined for the system. Complete sample data for these
parameters are included in Appendix A-2.
The relative accuracy was determined by a comparative evaluation of the
one hour EPA-8 sulfur dioxide concentrations and the corresponding DuPont
analyzer sulfur dioxide concentrations. The sulfur dioxide concentrations
-23-
environmental science and engineering, inc.
-------
Pressure Regulator
Fine-Adjust Valve
Flow Meter
Polyethylene Tubing
Calibration Gas
U-Tube Manometer
DuPont 406
S02 Analyzer
System
Strip Chart Westinghouse Adviser
Recorder Recorder
Figure 4-A. Calibration System Used for the DuPont
Analyzer System
S02
Gas
Inlet
Gas Vent To Atmosphere
S02 Gas Outlet
Rubber Stopper
Polyethylene Tubing
1-Liter Glass Jar
Figure 4-B. Moisture Trap And Pressure Check Used
For the DuPont Analyzer System
-24-
environmental science and engineering* inc.
-------
from the DuPont analyzer were determined by averaging six concentration
readings equally spaced over the one hour test period. The EPA-8 test
average concentration was then subtracted from the continuous system
average concentration. This was repeated for all nine test pairs.
The calibration error was determined from subtracting the known sulfur
dioxide value from the value shown by the continuous system for the series
of calibration gas injections. A series of three calibration gases
(approximately 5, 25, and 50 percent of span) were injected into the
system nonconsecutively before and after each EPA-8 test.
The repeatability of the system was determined by calculating the diff-
erences between successive readings on the strip chart for a certain
calibration gas concentration. The readings used were obtained from
the series of calibration gas injections used before and after each
EPA-8 test.
The response time was determined by injecting zero and 250 ppm cali-
bration gases intermittently into the system at the probe just outside
the stack, and then measuring the stabilizing time for each concentra-
tion. This was repeated three successive times. The mean of the three
up-scale test times and the mean of the three down-scale test times
were averaged separately, and the slower of the two was recorded as the
system response time.
-25-
environmental science and engineering, inc.
-------
In addition to the above tests, the three calibration gas cylinders
were analyzed by the EPA Method No. 8. The gas from the cylinders
was pushed through the EPA-8 sample train for 30 minutes and then the
impinger contents were analyzed for sulfur dioxide by the barium-
thorin titration method. The front half of the sampling train (see
Figure 5 ) was excluded during the calibration since the cylinders
contained only sulfur dioxide.
5.2 MANUAL METHOD FOR MEASURING SULFUR DIOXIDE
The method used for measuring the sulfur dioxide condensations of the
stack gases and the three calibration gases was the EPA Method No. 8
described in the Federal Register (Vol. 36, No. 247, December 23, 1971,
Washington, D.C.). With the exception of traversing the stack and
analyzing for sulfur trioxide and sulfuric acid mist, the EPA-8 Method
was used almost extensively.
Basically, a gas sample was extracted from the upper portion of the
outlet stack (see Figure 2), and the acid mist including sulfur tri-
oxide was separated from sulfur dioxide by using a sampling train con-
figuration as shown in Figure 5. The back half of the train (second
and third impingers) were analyzed for sulfur dioxide by the barium-
thorin titration method at the plant laboratory. The sample recovered
from the front half of the train (nozzle through the filter) was given
to plant personnel for their own use.
-26-
environmentnl science and engineering, inc.
-------
PO
18
1. Stainless Steel Nozzle
2. Heated, glass-lined probe
3. Impinger with 100 ml 80% Isopropanol
4. Impinger with 100 ml 3% Hydrogen Peroxide
5i Impinger with 100 ml 3% Hydrogen Peroxide
6. Impinger with 200 grams Silica Gel
7. Ice bath
8. Glass-fiber filter with glass holder
9. Flexible sample line
10. Vacuum gauge ! •
11. Coarse control valve
12. Fine control valve
13. Air-tight vacuum pump
14. Dry test meter
15. Thermometers
16. Calibrated orifice
17. Inclined manometer
18. S-type pi tot tube
FIGURE 5
EPA S02 AND S03 SAMPLE TRAIN
-------
Two EPA-8 sampling trains were run simultaneously for nine, one-hour
tests. The probes for the two trains, plus the probe being used for
the continuous monitor were positioned such that all three were located
approximately 12 inches from the stack wall, and within six inches of
each other.
Only one point was sampled by each of the three probes. Isokinetic
sampling was maintained by the two EPA-8 trains during each test run.
After the conclusion of each test run, the EPA-8 probes were disconnected
and the trains were purged with ambient air for 15 minutes at the same
rate used during the test.
After the sulfur dioxide samples (sample train back half) were recovered,
they were placed into glass sample jars and transferred to the laboratory.
They were not diluted to a volume of 500 ml, but were analyzed as recov-
ered. The appropriate volumes were recorded on the laboratory data sheets,
-28-
environmental science and engineering, inc.
-------
APPENDIX A-l
environmental science and engineering, inc.
-------
NOKKNCLATUFtf OF TF.RKS USED IN SOURCE SAMPLING CALCULATIONS
T - Net time of testing, minutes
PB - Barometric pressure, inches Hg
PS - Stack pressure, inches Hg
AH - Average pressure differential at gas rieter orifice, inches Hg
PO - Pressure at the gas meter orifice outlet, inches Hg, PB V-j-g
TM - Average gas meter temperature, °F
VC - Total net increase of moisture collected in the ircpingers, ml
VWV - Total volume of water vapor collected, cubic feet, S.T.P.
VM - Volume of dry gas sampled, cubic feet, raster conditions
VSTPD - Volume of dry gas sampled, cubic feet, S.T.P.
W(PCT) - Stack gas moisture, % volume
W - Fraction of moisture in stack gas
"FDA - Fraction of dfy stack gas
TS - Average stack gas temperature
COp - Amount of carbon dioxide in stack gas, % volume
Og - Amount of oxygen in stack gas, % volume
CO - Amount of carbon monoxide in stack gas, % volume
N2 - Amount of nitrogen in stack gas, % volume
EA - Amount of excess air in stack gas, % volume
HD - Stack gas molecular weight, ,. _:^e , dry basis
MS - Stack gas molecular weight, ,. Q, , stack conditions
GS - Stack gas specific gravity, referred to air
H - Average square root of all velocity head readings, /inches H20
CP - Pitot tube correction factor
]J - Average stack gas velocity, feet per minute
AS - Inside stack area, square feet
AS' - Effective.inside stack area, square feet
QS - Average stack gas flow rate, cubic feet per minute, stack conditions
QD - Average stack gas flow rate, cubic feet per minute, dry basis
QSTPD - Average stack gas flow rate, cubic feet per minute, S.T.P.
DN - Inside diameter of the sampling nozzle, inches
AN - Inside area of the sampling nozzle, square feet
PISO - Average percent of theoretical isokinetic sampling rate maintained
during test
S.T.P. - standard conditions, dry, 70C'F, 29.92 inches Hg
-------
SULFUR DIOXIDE EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS
The equation for calculating sulfur dioxide concentrations is:
C = (7.05 x 10-5) x (V. - Vtb)
S02 t
Vstpd
where, C™ = Concentration of sulfur dioxide
@ S.T.P., Lbs/Ft3
Vt = Volume of barium perch! orate titrant used
for the sample, ml
Vtb = Volume of barium perchlorate titrant used
for the blank, ml
N = Normality of barium perchlorate titrant, g-eq/
liter
Vsol = Total solution volume of samples, ml
Va = Volume of sample aliquot titrated, ml
Vst . = Volume of gas sample through the dry gas meter
® S.T.P., Ft3.
•3
To convert the sulfur dioxide concentration from Lbs/Ft to ports per
million, CSQ2 is multiplied by 6.042 x 106.
Example calculations for Run 1A are as follows:
C = (7.05 x 10-5) x (5.40 - 0.02) x(0.0116)
SQ2
32.297
CSQ2 = 5.68 x 10-5 Lbs/Ft3 (343 P. P.M.)
environmental science and engineering, inc.
-------
S.OUPCE S.AUELLILG. CALCULATIONS
PLANT- COASTAL CEEM. CORP.
«ACK- DEM IS TEH STACK
ATHER CONDITIONS- CLOUDY
AS1- 56.75 SQ. FEET TS_- 628 DEGREES R
«- 0.82 J// /720 4ff- 0.000341 SQ. FEET
TAL TIME- 60 MIN NPTS- 4 OR SAT:
DATE- 9/11/73
g£/ff 14 JV?0/'/ 11:45-12:45
PB- 29.89 IN~~HG ' PS- 29.89 IN HG
TM- 556.7 DEGREES R £-0.529 IW H20
CP- 0.83 Wf- 33.891 CF VC- 6 ML
T|n/7 = (0.0474)x(yc)
HVSTPD* ( (530)x(!//:)x(Pr?+(A77*13,6)) )4( 29.9
3)VT = (VVV) + (VSTPD)
11? = (Vl-JV) T (VT)
FDA = (1. 0 - ,V)
6)ASSUMED MOISTURE FRACTION
U//D = (.44x002) + (.32x02) + ( . 28x (C-0+,72 ) )
9)GS = (;VS) r (28.99)
£4 = (I00)x(02-0. 5xCY?)*( (0.266
^•.4F5( J(HxTS)
l&U = ( 174
J3)«5 = (i/) x
ijQZ? = (55) x (FZ?4)
< i^lo^'T'pn— ^/^n^ ^ ( ^^n — 71 c ^ x
• ^^H t: O ^. .1 t/ *• \ c-' is I " \ 3 O v • jL *J* / "
16)PJS0 = ( (0
I
3)i
I
.6);
I
.9);
)-(02-0.
JL-MFSTP = ( 15.43xJ ) 4 (VSTPD)
*! ^^H ^ yr ^ 7J* — ^ H T *7 *1 v T5 O v 2«* n ^ v J7* C* T* 73 ^ -i '7' C*
^_ f^H iS/iOi •• V _ / * /X^ijJ^Tr Zx/l "£.-Oj.xy • j. )j^
19)Z50 = ( SSrPxdOO+SA) ) 4 ?150)
20^27^ = (Oo 00857)x(£'53'P)x(Q52'P2))
UNITS : GRAINS/SCF
UNITS : GRAINS/ACF
UNITS : GPAINS/SCF
UNITS : POUNDS /HOUR
2 ) ^9_, 7,9.7
3 )_J12-^a
12.)_J.JLR3_.J _____ FP
~"~ ~~
__2 15
15 ) 9~12jf7
~"~~
PARTICULATE LAB AI1ALISIS(GM)\ PARTICIPATE COZCEllTRATIOllS(ABOVE) \ EMISSION RATE
&/OX/£>e:
X/D
-5
.1.
TEST COIJ DUCT ED BY :
environmental science and engineering, inc.
-------
mV.lRQUHEllT.AL ££I£
S.QU.2.CE SA
PLANT- COASTAL CHEM. CORP.
EACK- DEMISTER STACK
ATHER CONDITIONS- CLOUDY
AS<- 56.75 SQ. FEET I£- 628 DEGREES R
- 1.3 J77 7720 AN- 0.000341 SQ. FEET CP- 0.83 VM- 32.277 CF VC- 5.5 ML
TAL TIME- 60 ffIN NPTS- 4 ORSAT:
DATE- 0/11/73
flZ7A' 17? FROM 11:45-12:15
PB- 29.89 IN~JtG ' PS- 29.89 J/7 77£
A- 560.1 DEGREES R fi- 0.529 J77 7/20
— rTTV^T
Vl\fy = ( 0. 0474 ) x ( VC )
V5TPD= ( (530)x(W.')x(pfl + ( A7JT13.6)) )*
IW = (VII
FDA = (1.0 - J7)
6)ASSUMED MOISTURE FRACTION
jM-'Z? - (.44x2) + (.32x02) + ( . 28x ( £0+"72 ) )
Br/5 = (1W*FDA) + (18xT/)
9;C5 = (7f5) v (28.99)
J.OJEX = (lOO)x(Q2-0. 5xC5l'P)*2;2
"* ^^i 77* C f\ ^ ( 37* O '7' D v ^ ^ f^ (\ J. I** ^\ ^ i ^'ICrtN
_L9JiioO = V LoJ. F* (. 10 UT£^ ) ) - \. 1 b U ;
= (0.00857)x(£>57P)x(Q52'PI?)
2 )
3 )__
4 )_JLJlftfl.
5 )__Q
6 )__Q
7 )__2_8_._8_5
8 )Il2~8_.~7~6_
9 )I3~_9_9_I_
10 )__0
11 )I_13_.ICCI
12) ~l"CC3_*_7
1 3 )
-D;
1
15)
1 6 )
926 6
5 : GRAIffS/SCF
UNITS : GRAINS/ACF
UNITS : GRAIIJS/SCF
UNITS : POUNDS/HOUR
C
PARTICULATE LAB AUALISIS(GM) \ PARTICULAR COVCEI1TRATIOUS(A30VE) \ EMISSION RATL
W
%2 x
-5"
'///?
• ' /
con; IE NTS :
TEST CO I! DUCT ED BY :
environmental science and engineering, inc.
-------
AND
SQUPCE SAUP.LLHQ. CALCULATIONS
PLANT- COASTAL CI1EM. CORP.
I TACK- DEMISTER STACK
EATI1ER CONDITIONS- CLOUDY
AS'- 56.75 SQ. FEET T_S_- 628 DEGREES R
^IL- 0.73 It! 1120 AN- 0.000341 SQ. FEET
mOTAL TIME- 60 Mill 1JPTS- 4 ORSATi
DATE- 9/11/73
RUN 2A FROM 15:22-16:22
PB- 29.89 IN JIG PS- 29.89 IN HG
£M- 555 DEGREES R //- 0.5 IN 1120
CP- 0.83 VM- 31.555 CF VC- 5.5 ML
Im/7 = (0
)VSTPD= (
3)7? = (71/7) + (VSTPD)
1)1? = (7.77) T (VT)
)FDA = (1.0 - T7) ~ '
6)ASSUMED MOISTURE FRACTION
1)IID = (.44x^02) + (.32x02)
)MS = (MDxFDA) + (18xf/)
)GS - (MS) v (28.99)
3 )_ JLfiL* JJJ _____ ££:
4)_J)
S )I3
.28x(CO+H2))
(0.266x/72)-(C>2-0.
)
*AVG(J
7
8
8 .
)
= (U) x
= (QS) x (FDA)
- (QD) x ( 530r7;2 ) x (PS-J29.92)
= ( 15.43xJ ) * (VSTPD) ~UNITS : GRAIN5/SCF
- (l7.71xPSxFDAxESTP)*TS. UNITS : GRAINS/ACF
- ( ESTPx(iQO+EA) ) * (150) UNITS : GRAINS/SCF
= (0.00857)x(£'52'P)x(Q52'PZ?) UNITS : POUNDS /HOUR
12) l817_._8
1 3 )IToTl6j
14 ~" ."622"7 6
PARTICULATE LAB ANALYSIS( &D \ PARTICULATZ COiJCENTRATIOIJS(ABOVS) \ EMISSION RATl
x
< . O
COH11S3TS :
TEST CONDUCTED 3Y :
environmental science and engineering, inc.
-------
gQ.H5.CE.
EHG.ItLEE.RVlQ.*
C£LLC.VL&ZlQ.U.s
PLANT- COASTAL CJ1EM. CORP.
ACK- DEMISTER STACK
ATHER CONDITIONS- CLOUDY
'- 56.75 SQ. FEET ££- 628 DEGREES R
A//- 1.15 IN 1110 AN- 0.000341 SQ. FEET
TIME- 60 Mill NPTS- 4 OR SAT:
DATE- 9/11/73
RUN 2B FROM 1 5 : IV16 : 2 2
PS- 29.89 IN HG PS- 29.89 IN JIG
t- 561 DEGREES R fl- 0.5 J/7 #20
0P- 0.83 7tf- 31.514 0F 70- 5.5 ML
I)VUV = (0. 0474 )x( 70)
)VS?PZ)= ( (530)x(7;'/)xi
3) FT- = (7777) + (7STPZ?)
1)17 = (7,77) v (7?)
)FDA = (1.0 - f-7) ': '
6) ASSUMED MOISTURE FRACTION
()flD = (.44x002) + (.32x02)
)MS = (MDxFDA) + (18xJ/)
)GS - (MS) T (28.99)
(.28x(CO+N2))
(0.266x/;2)-(02-0. 5x00) )
f )*AVG(J
= (U) x (/15»)
= (Q,7) x (FDA)
= (QZ?) x ( 530*:£2 )
16)PJ50 = ( (0.00267x70x^5)+
1&ESTP = ( 15.43xJ ) * ?75r?P)
J.BE/10F = (17.11xPSxFDAxESTP)tT&
1T)ZSO = ( ESTPx(lQQ+EA) ) i ?150)
->n->PW = (0. 00857) *(ESTP)*(QSTPD)
t
^?AO ) f ( TI!!Exy_xPSxAN
UNITS i GRAIHS/SCF
UNITS : GRAINS/ACF
UNITS : GRAIUS/SCF
UNITS : POUNDS/HOUR
1) JD.
2 )_^^
3) JH^
5 )_^J
6 )_J3^2 •UlTjL
7 )_2£jt.£5
8)_2£^2£
9 ) £^ 9 9_
io)Io_~_I ~_^~
11 )_12J. 53
12 )_^J1J7^^ F_Pi
13 )_ 10J31 6 2_~~~£0£;
1^ )Il Ol26 8_~~~0f HI
15) 86223 SOT1.
i6)~IIII~II"IsI!
PARTICULATE LAB ASAIYSIS(GM)\ PARTICULATE CONCEHTRATIONS(ABOVE) \ EMISSION RATE
i_I_l i__
l&S/HR
CO'iMENTS :
^
CONDUCTED BY :
environmental science and engineering, inc.
-------
PLANT- COASTAL CUE11. CORP.
§ACK- DEMISTER STACK
ATHER CONDITIONS- CLOUDY
'- 56.75 SQ. FEET T.S_- 628 DEGREES R
Aff- 0.75 IN H10 AN- 0.000341 SQ. FEET
W)TAL TIME- 60 MIN NPTS- 4 OR SAT:
DATE- 9/11/73
RUN 3A FROM 1?: 35-18:35
PB- 29.89 IN EG PS- 29.89 IN fIG
T.M- 554.3 DEGREES R H- 0.51 IN 1120
CP- 0.83 7tf- 31.206 CF VC- 5.5 /•/£
K
VUV = (0. 0474)x('/C1)
VSTPD= ( ( 530 )x(7/')x(Pfl + (M*13. 6')) )*( 29.92x2V/
= (VI7V) v (VT)
= (1.0 - ,7)
6")ASSUMED MOISTURE FRACTION
2JUD - (.44x^02) H- (.32x(72) + ( . 28x ( CO+H2 ) )
»//5 = (iWxFDA) + (18x,7)
P)G5 = (7/5) v (28.99)
J.O)F-/1 =(lOO)x(02-0. SxCflHC (0. 266x/72)-(Q2-0.
1 )_JL-2£J ______ 2
2 )
3 )
7)
8).
9)
'.99
I
-•>£
JL3)Q5
•1 k^£)D
US')
:ez?) x (
)*AVG(
T?|5 ) x (P5v29.92)
1 2 )5_?
1 3 ) I3!_5^
"
15)
-ttESTP = (
^mEACF = (17.71xp5xFZ?ylx5'52'P) vTg
^.^£•50 = ( £r521Px(lOO+Fyl) ) v ?150)
= (0.
* (
r : GRAIIJS/SCF
UNITS : GRAINS/ACF
UNITS : GRAIIJS/SCF
: POUNDS/HOUR
PARTICULATE LAB AI1ALYSIS( GM) \ PARTICULATZ COIICEUTRATIOUS(ABOVE) \ EMISSION RATl
L_!_l 1 LEZZE1
2BI
COMIESTS :
TEST CONDUCTED BY :
environmental science and engineering, inc.
-------
* 1*15.*.
S.QI/S.CE SAUPLiilG CA.LCUL&TIOUS
PLANT- COASTAL CHEM. CORP.
tTACK- DEMI STEP STACK
EATHER CONDITIONS- CLOUDY
S1- 56.75 SQ. FEET £S_- 628 DEGREES R
Atf- 1.18 IN 1120 AN- 0.0003U1 SQ. FEET
mOTAL TIME- 60 MIS NPTS- 4 ORSAT:
DATE- 9/11/73
RUN 3B FROM 17:35-18:35
PR- 29.89 III EG PS- 29.89 IN HG
TJ1- 559.6 DEGREES R g- 0.51 Iff H20
CP- 0.83 VM- 31.692 CF VC- 5.5 ML
»)VUV = (0.04
)VSTPD= ( (53
)VT = (VUV) + (VSTPD)
»)U = (VUV) T (VT)
)FDA = (1.0 - U)
)ASSUMED MOISTURE FRACTION
7)HD = (.Ulfx£02) + (.32x02)
I)MS = (//Z)xFZ)/l) + (18x[/)
)GS = (/f5) * (28.99)
= (lOO)xi
29.92xT//
O-.OL.25J
2 )
3 )
(.28x(CO+/72))
0.26 6
.!•)/. PC C
*AVG(
I
x US')
= (QS) x (FZ?4)
= (QD) x
= ( 15
= (17.
= ( ESTPx(lQQ+EA) ) * (150)
= (0.00857)x(ESTP)*(QSTPD)
12 )
1 3 )
i1* )
is)
.
-ii.
: GRAINS/SCF
UNITS : GRAINS/ACF
UNITS : GRAIUS/SCF
UNITS : POUNDS/HOUR
PARTICULATE LAB ANALZSIS( GM) \ PARTICULATE COKCENTRATIONS(ABOVB) I EUISSIOl! RATE
-5"
- O
J» ^ ^^^^»»»» ••^^^••••^ •^•^•^1 ••••••^••••L^a
J^^
Z.ittj IIJ.
TEST CONDUCTED 3J :
environmental science and engineering* inc.
-------
§AHT- COASTAL CHEMICAL COUP.
ACK- DEMISTER STACK
ATJIER CONDITIONS- CLOUDY
AS'- 56.75 SQ. FEET 7.5- 628 DEGREES R
Mi- 0.63 IN mO AN- 0.000341 SQ. FEET
WOTAL TIME- GO MIS NPTS- 4 OR SAT:
DATE- 9/12/73
RUN HA FROM 10:55-11:55
PB- 30 IN HG PS- 30 177 JIG
TM- 550.6 DEGREES R H- 0.469 IN H20
CP- 0.83 VM- 28.822 CF VC- 5 ML
:|';'T'~= (
?. T«STPD= (
§7 = (
DA - (
' ) ASSUMED
V'D = (
'5 = (
- ) GS = (
('A = (
•'£( /( -::'x
= (
KD = (
j? m Tjp _ /
DPJ50 = (
0. 0474 )x( YC)
(530)x(!/v)x(p;? + (A2*13.S)) )*( 29.92X7L' )
7.V7) + (757PZ?)'
777) * (!'7)
1.0 - 7)
'lOISTUP.Z FP.ACTIOH
.1^x^702) + (.32x02) + ( . 28x(CO+:.?2) )
:~S) * (28.99)
I00)x(02-0. 5xO(?)vf (0.25Gx;.'2)-(02-0. 5x00) )
.75) ) = ( 1 *") x5 !':.'( /(.-:'x -?5) )
174xC"px ( J( 2? . 92vP5x 05 ) ) *AVG( f(H*TS) )
f/) x (/.51)
55) x (P^)
03) x ( 5 30 v 72 ) x (P5*2°.92)
(0. 00 2f)7x:-'i7x75 ) +( POx?5x 7."f f;/) ) v ( 7J.'.f.;7x:/xpJx;
1 ) _Q ^J
2 ) ^J^JJ£
3 )__.2-8.—D.9..7
4 )__J)— .0.0.8
c ^ \/
rj'\
9 ) J)_. J^
10) JD
1 1 ) il^JJSJ*
12) .ajj^ji
13)_ J£^^3
14 ) J^JJD
15) J JD^^
LV ) 16) ^^wjj
r/'r
.-.^ —
^---
"•
rr:-^
.*"-••
.-,-,--
-'•--•
_ *
'T»57P = ( 15.43xy ) f (757PI?) y/7J75 : GRAIX3/SCF
12Ai:iS/AC?
4
Z757 "^ x ( 1 0 C + £*/i) ) T ("150)
0. 00357 )x(r57P)x(.^57P5)
£7 7/J 75 : S?.AIi:S/3CF
UUITS : POUUDS/HOUR
ft>/ r>r^Tr»;»ri/7ir* r^7? / V>1 r 7? *" ?f ^"'^ 1 ^^J "^ ™T CUT £ ^^ m "T/*t?77JT'3 / -T T/0 -" ?f i! ^Dl/^* ^ i r".' r 7C r.^1/" 7? / -T*
* /I** — J. tx«y jj/^ .1 ij ^.'A J /•. if/iiJ_:iJ»j.OV,^»-/ | *./ii.j.J.OL/ i^/i j.i_. L.c/*.iM'j-i/«J.-./i*a.L/*»OV^»^^'»'i-'y I £ . tJ. *J O J. \s I* l;f±±^
SULFUR
V
.
LBS/UZ
"" ' ^* V" C •
<.«o-t «* ± o :
DJ.
environmental science and engineering, inc.
-------
§A11T- COASTAL CHEMICAL CORP. DATE- 9/12/73
ACK-- DE'IISTER STACK RUN 47? FROM 10:55-11:55
ATUER CONDITIONS- CLOUDY PB- 30 111 EG PS- 30 111 11G
§'- 56.75 SQ. FEET T.S_- 628 DEGREES R TM- 559.5 DEGREES R £- 0.469 J77 7/20
- 0.6 111 H20 Ail- 0.000341 SQ. FEET CP- 0.83 VII- 29.691 CF VC- 5 ML
TAL TIME- 60 7/1/7 11PTS- 4 OR SAT'.
: m:--v = (o. 0474 )x( -/o
' = (777) * (T'21)
= (1.0 - :/)
I
I
«
K
SSUMED :;OISTUP.E FP.ACTIO"-
= (.imxCOl) + (.32x02) + (.28x
'5 = C'DxFDA) + (18x,7)
= C'5) r (28.90)
= (I00)x(02-0. 5xClO)4( (0.2F6x.>72)-(02-0.
1 ) ___ D-.-2.3J7 _____ -
2 ) __ JLB-.2JL2 ____
3 ) __ ^B^_4jj ____
^ ) __ JCL-ODJ
5 ) __
6 )
7 )
8 )
2)
STP.D= (QD) x ( 5 30 v 2£ ) x (P.
J50 = ( (o.oo2B7xi'crxr;a)-i-(?ox
STP = ( 15.^3x7 ) ^ (757?i?)
! CF = ( 1 7 . 7 1 x p.7 x - ->: x 275 r ? ) v ??'
13) __
1^)__
15)__
15) __ JJ^
S* /•**>/7/^c/cr1:?
» Lr»* AJLifi^/OO.?
7*v 7" TO * '"»:?•:"*"'•*/yir1 —
C i i -L 2 O * '_r/* /i _ »» iJ / /I ^ i"
)T50 = ( E
;v = (o.
) T (150)
UXIT
O * ^7
RAi::s/
: POUNDS/HOUR
PARTIC'ULATE LAB AZAL2SIS( S.V) | PAT.TICULATZ
i_I'_l 1 122221
,/^n rT^r^pA ^Tn'~ S( L. 1 nv^ } I r"'T7 c ro ** ^ r7-
— c/i. L-i_,/.J./i/iu.J.L/**OV/lJ3C/rfcj^ I ...-i-iOO-i.~/ii Ai/i^.^.
i^rri __ir5ol__i__i^i_iLZ2Z^
SULfLlR
X
"
.1.
^ rt • * * f 'T* »T ^1
L iA-.« :*^** j. -
TEST COIJDUCTED BI :
environmental science and engineering, inc.
-------
S.2LZZZZ. 111
.. . . *.
§AtJT- COASTAL CHEMICAL CORP.
ACK- DEMISTER STACK
ATHER CONDITIONS- CLOUDY
AS'- 56.75 S#. F#£T 12- 628 DEGREES R
§- 0.82 .Z77 7/20 4/7- 0.000341 55. FEET
T4L TIME- 60 //277 I1PTS- 4 OR SAT:
DATE- 9/12/73
/?£/// 54 P7?0// 15:25-16:25
PS- 30 177 EG PS- 30 177 77<7
TJ±- 548.6 DEGREES R H- 0.529 177 #20
CP- 0.83 VM- 31.926 CT 7C- 5.5 ML
",'T/ —
-S3?PD =
0.
rvl3.5
23.S2X?;/
) '/T — \ »•' ^ / ^ \ * •" —'i-^ )
• ' = (7.77) * (!'")
'WDA = (1.0 - 7)
: )ASSUMED :'.OISTUP.E FP.ACTIOil
I!D = (.44x£02) + (.32x0
'S = C'DxFDA) + (lSx,7)
)GS = C'S) f (23.90)
«'A = (lOO)x(Q2-0. 5x£Y?)*( (0.2F
1
.28xi
:.':2)-
*.VG( 1(H*TS) ) = ( lf;V)x5•'.'/( / (.?xi75)
v = ( 174xCPx (^(29.92 -=-P5xc7J ) )x>3*
I
= (,7.?) x (rz?A)
2*P/?= (i?I/) x ( 530v22 ) x (?.'~f2n.22)
= ( 15.43xy ) * ("7STPZ?) UXITS : GRAI!;L
= ( z75??x(ioO+£^4) ) * (150)
= (0. 00857)x( £7Jr?)x(,05rPD)
SP.AI"S/SC?
D—j^
2 >—3^^s£2 zz:
3)_
4)_
5)1
e)_
7)_
8)_
o )
10)1
11 )_
12) A r\ r\ r\ r\ r1*?*
13)1
14 ) _•
15)1
16)
~2.
UI1ITS : POUlWS/nOUR
PAP.Tl'c'u'LA'Tr"dT:"CEnTPATIC~JS'(A30VZ:T
AT5 LA3 AI!AL2SI3(. 5.V
SULftjR
.1.
/ /
n '.'."TTTI
. i'o (^ j. £*!.'
environmental ttcience and engineering* inc.
-------
SA:-PL~-'
td/721- 00/1S2V1L CHEMICAL CORP.
ACK- DEMISTEP STACK
HEATHER CONDITIONS- CLOUDY
«'- 56.75 SQ. FEET T_&- 628 DEGREES R
- 0.76 J/7 #20 4#- 0.000341 SQ. FEET
TAL TIME- 60 MIN NPTS- 4 ORSAT:
DATE- 9/12/73
fltftf 5B F/?0tf 15:25-16:25
PS- 30 I// #0 PS- 30 lit HG
XM- 555.8 DEGREES R H- 0.529 I// #20
0P- 0.83 7/4- 32.722 CF VC- 5.5 //L
}V3TPD- ( ( 530)x(7.':)x(?^ + (_A2^13.5))
Mf™ = (777) + (T/rr?2?)'
• = (777) T (T-)
P.^. = (1.0 - 7)
)ASSUMED 'iOISTUP.E FP.ACTIOI1
)GS = C'S) T (23.9?)
•".< = (100 )x(02-0.5x00)*( ( 0 . 2 E r; x
' )^ = ( 174xCpx( /(2-D. 92TP5x0J)" ) x.
VD = ( Q.I) x (pj?>: )
'".???£>= (05) x ( 530*22 ) x (P^^"2n.
29.92:
!-0.5x00) )
•TS:
)PJ^0 = ( (0.00267x70x25!
I
o
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
9)
10)
11)
12)
13)
15)
16)
—IU.2S.1 siki.
.3^32.
.£ 1.
.1.2.21)^.1.
/ cr
7 = ( 0. 00357 )x(713TP)x(,05rPI>)
r;?TT'"C? . r^ f T;*~ I C/"s*
Jitd.j.d • Cr*i /i -£ /. x; / .5 U r
T ' vr r' c . "TIT •""/•'/""I*
i,-iil^C> : i_r/iH2 ;. O/.'ily r
u iVX ?!? : GP.AI ''SIS CF
UllITS : POUUDS/HOUR
.L-.Z-1.
I / TT"t>^
.1 i.siii.i.s.1.
.i££££l.
I T ni7^ } I r"-*r ^ -r ro ." p A J~rr
\.D \J \ *j ) \ . •• i J. ±S O J. *s it j.ifij.^1
.Ir50i__l__ir-i_iiz2/^.
L&S/HZ
environmental science and engineering, inc.
-------
PLANT- COASTAL CHEMICAL CORP.
MTACK- DEMISTEP STACK
BEATIIER CONDITIONS- CLOUDY
AS1- 56.75 S<2. FEET T£- 628 DEGREES R
IE- 0.76 J/1/ #20 /I//- 0.000341 SQ. FEET
CIVIL TI/./E.- ei MI a NPTS- * ORSAT-.
DATE- 9/12/73
RUN SA FROM 17:45-18:45
PB- 30 IN HG PS- 30 IN HG
T.M- 544.4 DEGREES R H- 0.51 IN H20
CP- 0.83 7A/- 31.901 CF VC- 5.5
:i
• Tfc
'.*-'!' = 0.0474)x(7C)
'
(7.77) 4 (IT)
(1.0 - ?/)
) :!OISTU!?H FP.ACTIC"-
(.44x(702) + (.32*22) +
{rpxFDA) + (18x.-/)
(."5) v (2S.90)
(lOO)x(Q2-0. 5xCpT( (0.
6)
7 ) 2ft-» 8 5
VG(
t-' = V *•••; • > ) - - \ - — • - *
S^P.D- (QD) x ( 5?0v£2 ) x (?.c'*2n.92)
11)
12)—insru.3 121'.
* /^X7" *
15)__
16 )„
^ g;
= (0. 00857)x( rjr?)x(C5rPZ?)
i//VJr5 : POUNDS /HOUR
VARTICULATZ LAB AI!AL2SIS(
L_Z_1 ____.
I | PAP.TICULATZ CO::CEI1T?.ATIO::5(A30VZ) I ~::I3SIOi" PATE
.1 mrzi iSi^ri ir-oi__i__i^l_IiZ2/u2.
SULFUR
LBS/PT1
X
^91;? ^
-------
jj»»TT/T'?/^*7**"*''T*/ir o/^T~**7''T>-t 4 *7 O 3**r'^T^'iTf*r*^T'.*7^ T' rf^
£ii£ J»&i_LL——'— ^i^A.d.^ «^« wL^c. £!_£• v^*Z&«^:^^L»_££ » *_ ••*••' •
PLANT- COASTAL CHEMICAL CORP.
gtTACK- DEMI STEP STACK
WEATHER CONDITIONS- CLOUDY
AS**- 56.75 SQ. FEET IS.- 628 DEGREES R
- 0.71 Iff 1120 All- 0. 000341 SQ. FEET
TIME- 61 Mil! I1PTS- 4 OR SAT:
DATE- 9/12/73
fli/// 6B FROM 17:45-18:45
PB- 30 J// 11G PS- 30 I// #S
TM- 550.8 DEGREES R fi- 0.51 J/7 7/20
CP- 0.83 W/- 32.508 CF 7C1- 5.5 /-/L
'."7 = (0.0474)x(7£)
23.92x7;:;
-•' = (7.77) T (I'f)
WDA = (1.0 - '/)
ASSUMED I'.OISTUP.E FPACTICir
I»2) = (.H4XCC2) + (.32x^2)
.'5 = C'VxFDA) + (18xr.7)
•)GS = (."5) T (28,90)
V! = ( 100)x(Q2-0. SxCf?) *(
28x ( T
KS = (LO x US')
Z? = (,7.C) x (?/?A)
STPD= (QD) x ( 530*
)?J£0 = ( (0. 002r>7xrC
§52*P = ( 15.43xV ) ^
AC? = (i7.7ixpjx.r- .
2£ )
(P.?*2I'.92)
* (150)
= (0. OOS57)x( r^r
UNITS : GRAII13/5CF
i.';;irs : GZAZZS/ACF
tfiYJFS : S?.AIi:S/SCr
UNITS : POUUDS/P.OUR
1)_
2)_
3)
4)
5)_
6)_
7)_
8)_
2)_
10).
11 )_
12)_
13)_
1^)_
15 )_
16 )_
-JX-2-C4
- -34-,
..0,-OJia
--O, .3.9.2
r« *\ [ :?•' r -7 c? r.o 7- r> * -r*
«_/ / I *-, -iO.OOJ.-/iJ A . /I. « W
iBs/fr^
.
.1.
environmental science and engineering* inc.
-------
§ANT- COASTAL CHEMICAL CORP.
ACK- DEMISTER STACK
ATHER CONDITIONS- PAIN
AS'- 56.75 SQ. FEET T.S.- 623 DEGREES R
Ml- 0.76 1/7 1110 AN- 0.000341 SQ. FEET
WOTAL TIME- 60 MIN NPTS- 4 OR SAT:
DATE- 9/13/73
RUN 7A FROM 11:40-12:HO
PB- 30 IN HG PS- 30 IN JIG
M- 540.6 DEGREES R g- 0.51 IN H20
CP- 0.83 7W- 31.029 CF VC- 5.5 ML
= (0.
530)x( ir:
•m = (777) f (I'?)
- fwj)^ = (1.0 - 7)
1) ASSUMED MOISTURE FP.ACTI011
~* B.fxpiM) + (isx,v)
)G5 = (;':'5) f (23.90)
r/ = (100) x (o 2 - o.
!
(0.26Gx/;2)-(J2-0.
rP = ( 15.43x7 ) f (VSTPD)
)T50 = ( r5??x(ioO+r/4) ) T (150)
: if'! = ( 0. 00857 )x(£-Jrp)x(i25r?Z?)
J[
UNITS : G3AIKS/SCF
/^Jr5 : S2AIZ3/AC?'
&',VJr5 : G?.AIZS/3CP
Z/iVIfS : POUNDS/HOUR
D—Jl
2)__^L
3)__
4)__
5 ) CL.D.9.2-.
6)
7)
8)__.2B^7.6_
9)_
10)__J)_
1D__
12)__
13)__
1^)__
15)__
16)__
cr"
~~o/
1_I_1
SULFUR
i ___ LZZZZ1 _______ LSd££l
r— \ | r"'T"C7"O?' r> /
' ^ ) \ r . ._
-------
§A11T- COASTAL CHEMICAL CORP.
ACK- DEMISTER STACK
HEATHER CONDITIONS- RAI1J
§'- 56.75 SQ. FEET T_S_- 623 DEGREES R
- 0.71 Jtf #20 AN- 0.000341 SQ. FEET
TAL TIME- 60 MIN NPTS- 4 OP SAT:
DATE- 9/13/73
#i/// 7B FROM 11:40-12:40
PB- 30 Iff EG PS- 30 Iff tf£
ZM- 540 DEGREES R g- 0.51 Jtf #20.
CP- 0.83 W/- 29.264 CF VC- 5.5 /•/£
= (0.0474)x(c)
(y;/1/) T (IT)
d.o - 7)
:'.OISTUP.E FP.ACTIGl:
(.44x{702) + (.32x^2)
+ (18x.V)
("S) v (23.9°)
(100)x(Q2-0. 5xCf>)f (
(0. 002B
15.43x7
' ?R . gk-g,
> QL, JJ^_J1^_"_^.
> ?R . a_5
ID—
13) ^nu
(7STPD)
rsr?)*ii
) ) * (150)
I//7J75 : CRAIK3/SCF
: GZAI-:S/AC?
: GP.AI"S/ECr
' : POUilDS/UOUR
-5"
TrS? CO!!DUCTED 37 :
enrironmental science and engineering, inc.
-------
PLANT- COASTAL CHEMICAL CORP.
fACK- DEMISTER STACK
ATHER CONDITIONS- PAIN
'- 56.75 SQ. FEET %£- 623 DEGREES R
AH- 0.76 IIJ 1120 AN- 0.000341 SQ. FEET
WDTAL TIME- 60 MIN NPTS- 4 OR SAT:
DATE- 9/13/73
RUN 8A FROM 13:05-14:05
PS- 30 IN HG PS- 30 IN IIG
- 542.3 DEGREES R £-0.51 IN H20
CP- 0.83 VM- 31.281 CF VC- 5.5.A/L
( o. 0474)* ( vc)
( (530)x(7")x(?;?+( *£* 13.5))
(7.Y7) + (T/rr?I?)
(7.77) v (IT)
5 )ASSUMED :'.OISTUZE FP.ACTIOi:
7B/2? = (.44x^02) + (.32x02) + (.28xi
:l
= ( 100)x(02-0.
<")*( (0. 265x7.T2)-(32-0. 5 =
IfAC
)T50
?tf
(i?-) x (?Z?/;)
P5) x ( 530
( 15.43xy ) * (757P5)
(17.71 xp.7x?J.4 xZTjrP) * 7^
( Z7S7?x(iQO+Z/n ) T (150)
( O.OOS57)x(JTJrP)x(r;57PD)
92)
~UNITS : GRAIHS/SCF
UNITS : G2AIZS/ACF
UNITS : POUNDS/HOUR
1 )—IUJ2J6.1_.
2 ) J3U^J1J.
3 ) .3.0^.334.
4) D^jDD£_.
5) r
8) 22^.25
9) 3^33
10) jQ
11 )__^2^J2J.
12)
13)__.
15)__
'ARTICULATE LA3 A;;AL2SlS( 01!) \ P/
r> IT>T rri r A .
t. . ^. -L U L/ i//l
i | r.:i3Sioi: P.A'.
• i__ir.^i_iiZ2/!
SULFUR
.1.
x
.1.
•IV. .t&H J.
TT£"57 CONDUCTED 3j :
environmental science and engineering, inc.
-------
jjLAUT- COASTAL CHEMICAL CORP.
fACK- DEMISTER STACK
LEATHER COUDITIOUS- RAIN
AS'- 56.75 SQ. FEET T,S_- 623 DEGREES R
Wn- 0.71 IJ1 1120 AN- 0.000341 SQ. FEET
TIME- 60 Mill NPTS- 4 OR SAT:
DATE- 9/13/73
RUN 87? FROM 13:05-14:05
PS- 30 IN JIG PS- 30 III JIG
£M- 543.9 DEGREES R g- 0.51 Iff #20
CP- 0.83 VM- 30.063 CF VC- 5.5 ML
0 . 04 74 ) x ( 7/7
29.S2XT//
•' = ( 777 )*(!•'?)
-W3A = (i.o - 7)
•:) ASSUMED :'.OISTUP.E FPACTIOiJ
I'D = (.44x/702) + (.32x02) + ( . 28x ( CC+P2 ) )
'5 = (I'DxFDA) + (lSx,7)
~ )GS = (;"5) * (2S.99)
;*fA = ( 100)x(C>2-0. 5xCY?)i( (0.2Pgx.V2)
ACF =
:M1'
= (.aT) x (FD/i)
= (i?5) x ( 530*22 )
= ( (0. 002&7xI'Cx22 )+
= ( 15.43xy ) ^ (VSTPD)
7.71xpjx.P£/.xrj:'?)*22
£-sr?x(ioo+r,n ) * (150)
H)__JL2^
13)~
16)11
•- ( r\ ^f^Q^*7^v^'"~T•'"^^"*7^^vf''~ICT'T'
•" v vo U U O D / /*-\LlL3~.£r) •^Vv^'O^.j
UNITS : GRAINS
' t> I ± 5 i u-**/i ± *Vo IA C?
L/ i / -t J. O • Lr.'./:ljL..O/OG —
UUITS : PO UHD SI HO UR
1. II X
//••*>/
.L
iL^
ZT5? CO!-DUCT ED 31 :
environmental science and engineering, inc.
-------
PLA11T- COASTAL CHEMICAL CORP.
§ACK- DEMI STEP STACK
ATHER CONDITIONS- RAI11
AS1- 56.75 Sa. fT£T ££- 623 DEGREES R
£- 0.76 I// #20 4/7- 0.0003m 55. FEET
TIME- 60 WI/7 /VPTS- 4 OP SAT:
DATE- 9/13/73
tftf/7 9/1 FROM 11:25-15:25
PB- 30 J/7 EG PS- 30 J/7 ffC
TM- 5U4.8 DEGREES R fi- 0.51 1/7 7/20
<7P- 0.83 VM~ 32.13 CF PC- 5.5 ML
"Br-T = ( o. 9474 )x( 7C) iT
WS?PD= ( (530)x( !/:.')*(?H + ( A£f 13.5)) )*( 29.92x7;; ) 2 )_
1= (7.77) T (re) Ml
*M = (1.0 - 7) 5)_
) ASSUMED :!OISTUR" FP.ACTIOiJ 6)_
»£> = (,44x£C2) + (.32x02) + ( . 28x ( CC+X2 ) ) 7)_
5 = (rDxFDA) + (18xj7) 8)_
\/"*o— f*'c^•^oQoo^ o^
) CrD -l...Oy-^^0.'JrJJ -*/_
T/^( ^( Vx^5) ) = ( IT ")X^'"'( / (/-'X-17.?) ) 11)
= ( 1 74xCPx ( / ( 2° . ° ° vP5x JJ ) ) x/J 7/5 ( /(j?x T»5) ) 12)
)35 = (tO x ' (/,J« ) 13).
IZ? = (2*7) x ( ^D/ ) 14)
: ' . . _ . ^i,«, «. -\ _',-\~
STP.D= (QD) x ( 5 30 v. 75 )x(p,--T2n.52) 15)_
||57P = ( 15.43xJ ) * ("ySTPZ?) ~U!!ITS : GRAIS3/SCF
WACP - (i7.7ixp.7xp:?/.x£-jrp) v?.? • U::ITS : GP.AII:S/AC?
™50 = ( Z75??x(lOO+Z,O ) * (150) UHITS : GP.AIl:5/3Cr
y:-/ = ( o . oo s 5 7 ) x ( ES?P) x ( gsr?z? ) VSITS : POUNDS /UOUP.
+AR7ICVLATE M3 X;/AL75J5( 5.7)^ PA^JC^r27 CO::gJ'™rJ0.7S(^30^
SULFUR D/^X/2^ LB^ / FT ^rff)
-t?
£ & £'* Jb 33O
_0 ^>£1 "?r
::fiS±:::::::
n p 9 y ^ •? ** **-•
.— -U_*-D _*;_—. __*:j _*_•___
rt.
IJ
._^^^J2J _ - .
._.lD.ii.5.8.5 X-r"
^£^J£ ?-~"-
0
._^£-5 a
py.issiox RATE
LBS>/HK.
. -
environmental science and engineering, inc.
-------
PLANT- COASTAL CHEMICAL CORP.
fACK- DEMI S TER STACK
ATHER CONDITIONS- RAIN
AS'- 56.75 SQ. FEET %£- 623 DEGREES R
Afl- 0.71 IN 1120 AN- 0.000341 SQ. FEET
WDTAL TIME- eo MIN NPTS- 4 OR SAT:
DATE- 9/13/73
RUN 9S FROM 14:25-15:25
PS- 30 IN HG PS- 30 IN HG
TJA- 546.9 DEGREES R fl- 0.51 IN 1120
CP- 0.83 VM- 31.521 CF VC- 5.5 ML
f \.i\r
5 -""P."
- NT/"'
. m
: WDA
: IASSU:
TWD
-I*
«X
!'S< ,
"107
.. Jr/._>
-|b
: mSTPi
I) PI 30
= ( 0.0474 )x( 7C)
?= ( ( 530)x(F:.')x(P? + ( A7*13. 5)) )*( 29.92x17.' )
= ( 777 ) + ( VZTPD )
= (7.77) T (7f)
= (1.0 - 7)
!EV MOISTURE FP.ACTICH
- (.44x^*02) + (.32x02) + ( . 28x ( CC+?72 ) )
= (i'P*FDA) + (ISx.V)
= (:':'5) v (23.90)
= (100)x(i02-0.5x£0)T( ( 0. 266x.V2)-(32-0. 5xC"0) )
/( Hx"S) ) = (1 * " ) x 5. '•'"( / ( 5/x -^5 ) )
= ( 174xCpx ( /( 2° . or> *P5xSJ ) ) x>lT/Gr ( /(.?x/?5) )
= (tO x (/,£')
= ( ff.T ) X ( PZ? i; )
?= ( OD ) x ( 530*75 ) x (P5*2n.92)
= ( (0. 00267xrCxr>5) + (Pox?5x7.'/*21;.') ) * ( TI!!ZxUxPSxA:
1) J]UJ2£J_
2 )__ JLD_ AB_3
M \
4 ) CU-DDJ3 _
6)__^Ji2-_^C
7) _^B-JL5 .
8) JLB-..7JB
10)_ JL. _
11) .1?..7?J7
12) 1PU3
13) lO^^P0!
14) 103707
4 C N
' ) 16) Q£L-JL
r-r
P.^_
---
.£i? — --.
"•
r~- •
.«." — ••
.-— , .-.
"'
!l
4
= ( 15.43xy ) r (75.7PU)
/i c7i-* = ( 1 7 . 71 xp."xf J7>! xZ?5"P) *Zil
= ( 0. 00857) x(Z75?p)x(,75rPZ?)
: POUNDS/HOUR
7AZTICVLATE IAB~ANALYSIS( G^ll PAP.TICULATZ COIlCZ^RATIOIiS^BCVE) |"
/ /
_&&_Sr3L-:£tft£A__h^
environmental science and engineering, inc.
-------
APPENDIX A-2
environmental science and engineering, inc.
-------
PROCEDURE FOR DETERMINING MEAN VALUES
AND 95% CONFIDENCE INTERVALS
MEAN VALUE •
n
Z Xi
X = i=l
n
Where X = Mean Value
Xi = Individual Values
n = Number of Data Points
Z = Sum of the Individual Values
95% Confidence Interval
a 2 21/2
rr - S*1 " "H v /(n(ZX1 } * (ZX1) }
I'-iqj- ~ \ ) X ( )
b ( /IT ) ( n(n-l) )
Where CI9g = 95% Confidence Level
Xi = Individual Values
n = Number of Data Points
Z = Sum of the Individual Values
*1 " %~= ^.975, for n samples from a table of
percentages of the "t" distribution
environmental science and engineering, inc.
-------
RELATIVE ACCURACY TEST
SULFUR DIOXIDE CONCENTRATION, P.P.M.
Run No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Mean Di
CI 95 =
DuPont
307
300
250
325
320
290
390
395
340
fference for
(t-| - a/2)
( /IT ^ '
Sampl
EPA-8
343
342
281
377
350
333
359
375
330
Train "A" =
2
(nUXi ) -
(2.306)
e Train "A"
Difference
-36
-42
-31
-52
-30
-43
+31
+20
+10
61-234
9 = -19 PPM
2
UXi) ) 1/2
1) ^
(9(10980) - (-173)
Sampl
EPA-8
291
341
325
340
327
287
426
430
395
(-1.9%
°>v2
e Train "B"
Difference
+16
-41
-75
-15
- 7
+ 3
,-36
-45
-55
of span)
23.7PPM (Mean D'
CI 95 for Train "A" = (/=F~) x ( 9T9T)'. ) ference ± 2.4%
of span)
environmental science and engineering, inc.
-------
RELATIVE ACCURACY (SAMPLE TRAIN "A")
III TV PL
THIS PROGRAM IS USED TO DE TERM 111 E A CO 11 FIDE 11CE
INTERVAL FOR THE ME Ail OF A SET OF DATA USING
THE '2" STATISTICS. . .EUTER DATA POIiiTS
D:
~36 "42 "31 "52 ~30 ~43 31 20 10
If ORE? Jl
~36 "42 "31 "52 ~30 ~43 31 20 10
9 VALUES ENTERED
EXTER PERCENT DEGREE OF C011FIDE11CE(USUALLX 95»/o)
G:
95
ENTER T STATISTIC VALUE FOR 7(0.025 , 8)
D:
2.306'
2.306
MEAN VALUE = "19.22222222
STANDARD DEV=30.84144038
95<>/o CONFIDENCE INTERVAL FOR THE MEAN VALUE
"42.92900939
-------
RELATIVE ACCURACY (SAMPLE TRAIN "B")
INTVRL
THIS PROGRAM IS USED TO DETERMINE A CONFIDENCE
INTERVAL FOR THE ME All OF A SET OF DATA USI11G
THE '2" STATISTICS. . .ENTER DATA POINTS
D:
16 "41 "75 ~15 "7 3 ~36 ~45 ~55
MORE?. 11
16 "in "75 "15 "7 3 "36 ~45 ~55
9 VALUES ENTERED
EllTER PERCENT DEGREE OF CONFIDENCE(USUALL2 95o/o)
D:
95
EllTER T STATISTIC VALUE FOR T( 0.025 . 8)
D:
2.306
2.306
MEAN VALUE = "28.33333333
STANDARD Z?E7=29 . 50847 336
95<>/o CONFIDENCE INTERVAL FOR THE MEAN VALUE
"51. 015 51 31 9 < /•/£V1 // < ~ 5 . 651153478
OR
"28.33333333 +22.68217986
Mean Difference = - 28 x 100 =-2.8% of span
1000
CIn_ = Mean Difference ± 2.3% of span
environmental science and engineering, inc.
-------
CALIBRATION ERROR TEST
S02 CONCENTRATIONS, PPM
DuPont Calib. Gas Diff.
60 45 +15
42
30
20
40
40
45
40
42
55
45
45
40 v
- 3
=15
-25
- 5
- 5
0
- 5
- 3
+10
0
0
, - 5
DuPont Calib. Gas Diff.
240 245 -5
245
220
225
225
200
220
210
220
230
220
215 v
0
-25
=20
-20
-45
-25
-35
-25
-15
-25
/ -30
DuPont Calib. Gas Diff.
470 446 +24
470
440
445
420
445
440
435
445
455
460
450
455 v
+24
- 6
- 1
-26
- 1
- 6
-11
- 1
+ 9
+14
+ 4
/ + 9
-------
CALIBRATION ERROR (45 PPM)
111 TV EL
THIS PROGRAM IS USED TO DETERMINE A CONFIDENCE
INTERVAL FOR THE ME All OF A SET OF DATA USING
THE '211 STATISTICS...ENTER DATA POINTS
C:
15 ~3 "15 "25 "5 ~5 0 ~5 ~3 10 0 0 ~5
MORE? N
15 ~3 "15 "25 ~5 ~5 0 ~5 ~3 10 0 0 ~5
13 VALUES ENTERED
ENTER PERCENT DEGREE OF CONFIDENCE(USUALLY 95<>/o)
C:
95
ENTER T STATISTIC VALUE FOR 7(0.025 , 12)
C:
2.179
2.179
MEAN VALUE = "3.153846154
STANDARD DEV=Q.84755599
95o/o CONFIDENCE INTERVAL FOR THE MEAN VALUE
"9.105175885
-------
CALIBRATION ERROR (245 PPM)
H1TVRL
THIS PROGRAI: is USED TO DETERMINE A CONFIDENCE
INTERVAL FOP. THE HE All OF A SET OP DATA USI11G
TP.E T1 STATISTICS...ENTER DATA POINTS
C:
~5 0 ~25 ~20 "20 ~45 ~35 ~25 ~25 ~15 ~25 ~30
MORE? II
~5 0 "25 "20 "20 "45 ~35 ~25 '~25 ~15 ~25 ~30
12 VALUES ENTERED
Ell TEX PERCENT DEGREE OF COUFIDE11CE( USUALLY 95o/o)
D:
95
Ell TEE T STATISTIC VALUE FOR T( 0.025 , 11)
D:
2.201
2.201
MEAK VALUE = ~22.5
STAUDARD DEV=12.15431087
95o/o COHFIDE11CE INTERVAL FOR THE HE All VALUE
~30.22253277
-------
CALIBRATION ERROR (446 PPM)
INTVRL
THIS PROGRAM IS USED TO DETERMINE A CONFIDENCE
INTERVAL FOR THE ME AH OF A SET OF DATA USING
THE »2" STATISTICS...EUTER DATA POINTS
G:
24 24 "6 "1 "26 ~1 ~G ~11 ~1 9 14 4 9
MORE? 11
24 24 6 ~1 ~26 ~1 ~6 "ll "l 9 14 4 9
13 VALUES BUTERED
ENTER PERCENT DEGREE OF CO?1FIDE11CE(USUALLI 95o/o)
LJ •
95
ENTER T STATISTIC VALUE FOR T(0.025 , 12)
2.179
2.179
MEAN VALUE = 2.461538462
STANDARD C£T=13.90213044
95o/o CONFIDENCE INTERVAL FOR THE MEAN VALUE
~5.940156568<;/2'/l//<10.86323349
OR
2.461538462 +8.401695029
Mean Difference = -2.5 xlOO = - 0.3% of span
1000
g = Mean Difference ± 0.8% of span
environmental science and engineering, inc.
-------
ZERO DRIFT TEST
Date Time S02. PPM Difference, PPM
(Start) 8/29/73 1330 5 +10
1530 15 +8
1730 23 - 4
1930 19 - 8
2130 11 -10
2330 1 0
8/30/73 0130 1 - 1
0330 0 0
0530 0 +1,
(End) 0730 1
environmental science and engineering, inc.
-------
ZERO DRIFT TEST (2-HOUR INTERVALS)
?V.IS PROGRAM 12 U3EP TO DETEPulIKE A CC11EIDE11CE
INTERVAL FOR T:'E ME All OF A SET CF DATA USING
THE '?' STATISTICS. . .EI1TER DATA POIIITS
D:
10 8 "4 ~8 "10 0 ~1 0 1
I:ORE? if
10 8 ~4 ~3 "10 0 ~1 0 1
9 VALUES ENTERED
EFTER PERCENT DEGREE CF COVF.TDEUCE (USUALLY 95»/o)
D:
95
EETER T STATISTIC VALUE FOP. T(0.025 , 8)
C:
2.306
2.3GG
ME All VALUE = ~0 .
STAI1DAP.D D£T=G.559556218
95o/o COHFIVEiJCE INTERVAL FOR THE MEAN VALUE
^ "5.486556657
-------
ZERO DRIFT TEST (18-HOUR INTERVAL)
Date And Time S02> PPM
Start : 8/29/73 (1330) 5
End : 8/30/73 (0730) 1
Mean Difference = - 4 x 100 = -0.4% of span
1000
Mean = 3 ppm
CIg5 = Mean +_ 2.5% of span
THIS PROGRAM IS USED TO DETERMINE A CONFIDENCE
INTERVAL FOR THE ME All OF A SET OF DATA USING
TEE '2" STATISTICS...ENTER DATA POINTS
C:
5 1
MORE? N
5 1
2 VALUES ENTERED
EtiTER PERCENT DEGREE OF COllFIDEHCECJSUALLZ 95 <>/<>)
C:
95
ENTER T STATISTIC VALUE FOR T(0.025 , 1)
D:
12.706
12.706
HZAli VALUE = 3
STAlt'CARD £1/7=2.820427125
95o/o CONFIDENCE INTERVAL FOR THE HE AN VALUE
OP
3 +25.412
environmental science and engineering, inc.
-------
CALIBRATION DRIFT TEST
Date Time
(Start) 8/30/73 0900
1100
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
(End) 2300
8/31/73 0100
0300
0500
0700
S02, PPM
229
259
260
257
239
251
229
223
163
131
47
35
Difference, PPM
+30
+ 1
- 3
-18
+12
-22
- 6
(Moisture in
(the sample Tin
environmental science and engineering, inc.
-------
CALIBRATION DRIFT TEST (2-HOUR INTERVALS)
TUTVRT.
•THIS PP.OGRA:-! IS USED TO DETER:ii:iE A CONFIDENCE
IUTERVAL FOP, THE HE All OF A SET OF DATA VSI11G
THE '2" STATISTICS. . .E11TER DATA POINTS
G:
30, 1, 3, ~18, 12, "22, ~6
MORE? HO
30 1 "3 "13 12 ~22 "6
7 VALUES ENTERED
EUTER PEPCE 1ST DEGREE OF COr,FIDEUCE(U2TJALLI 95<>/o)
G:
95
EUTER T STATISTIC VALUE FOR T(0.025 , 6)
C:
2.447
2.447
ME All VALUE = "0.3571423571
STANDARD DEV=±7.7Gl64943
95o/o COIIFIDEIJCE INTERVAL FOR THE HE All VALUE
~ 17 . 2 8 4 5 2 0 5 0
-------
CALIBRATION DRIFT TEST (14-HOUR INTERVAL)
Date And Time S02, PPM
Start : 8/30/73 (0900) 229
End : 8/30/73 (2300) 223
Mean Difference = -6 x 100 = 0.6% of span
1000
Mean = 226 ppm
CI95 = Mean +_ 3.8% of span
THIS PROGRAM IS USED TO DETERllIHE A COUFIDEIJCE
INTERVAL FOP. THE MEAN OF A SET OP DATA US Iff C-
TKE''T* STATISTICS...ENTER DATA POINTS
G:
229 223
MORE? 11
229 223
2 VALVES ENTERED
EllTER PERCENT DEGREE OF CONFIDENCE(USUALLY 95<>/o)
D:
95
ENTER T STATISTIC VALUE FOR 7(0.025 , 1)
D:
12.706
12.706
ML All VALUE = 226
STAUDARD DEV=H. 242640687
95»/o CONFIDENCE INTERVAL FOR THE 11EA11 VALUE
107 .8
OR
226 +38.118
environmental science and engineering* inc.
-------
REPEATABILITY TEST
SULFUR DIOXIDE CONCENTRATION, PPM
45
DuPont
60
42
30
20
40
40
45
40
42
55
45
45
40
PPM Calib. Gas
Difference
-18
-12
-10
+20
0
+ 5
- 5
+ 2
+13
-10
0
- 5
245
DuPont
240
245
220
225
225
200
220
210
220
'-- 230
220
215
PPM Calib. Gas
Difference
+ 5
-25
+ 5
0
-25
+20
-10
+10
-10
-10
- 5
446 PPM
DuPont
470
470
440
445
420
445
440
435
445
455
460
450
455
Calib. Gas
Difference
0
-30
+ 5
-25
+25
- 5
- 5
+10
+10
+ 5
-10
+ 5
-------
REPEATABILITY (45 PPM)
INTVRL
THIS PROGRAM IS USED TO DETERMINE A CONFIDENCE
INTERVAL FOR THE MEAN OF A SET OF DATA USING
THE '2" STATISTICS...ENTER DATA POINTS
C:
"18 "12 "10 20 0 5 ~5 2 13 ~10 0 ~5
MORE? 11
"18 "12 "10 20 05 "5 2 13 ' ~10 0 ~5
12 VALVES ENTERED
ENTER PERCENT DEGREE 'OF CONFIDENCE(USUALLX 95<>/o)
C: '
95 '
ENTER T STATISTIC VALUE FOR T(0.025 , 11)
D:
2.201 ' ' '
2.201
MEAN VALUE = ~1.666666667
STANDARD DEV=10.79842862
95o/o CONFIDENCE INTERVAL FOR THE MEAN VALUE
8 . 527707141
-------
REPEATABILITY (245 PPM)
INTVHL
THIS PROGRAM IS USED TO DETERMINE A CONFIDENCE
INTERVAL FOE THE 1'EAN OF A SET OF DATA US IIIG
THE '2" STATISTICS...ENTER DATA POINTS
[j:
5 "25 5 0 "25 20 ~10 10 ~10 ~10 ~5
i-lORE? N
5 "25 5 0 "25 20 ~10 10 ~10 ~10 ~5
11 VALUES ENTERED
ENTER PERCENT DEGREE OF COilFIDEHCE(USUALLY 95o/o)
D:
95
ENTER T STATISTIC VALUE FOR T(0.025 , 10)
D:
2.228
2.220
ME All VALUE = "4.090909091
STANDARD DEV=13.93165134
95o/o CONFIDENCE INTERVAL FOP. THE MEAN VALUE
~13.449736567<5.267918377
OR
"4.090909091 +9.358827468
Mean Difference = -4.1 x 100 = - 0.4% of span
1000
CIg5 = Mean Difference ± 0.9% of span
environmental science and engineering, inc.
-------
REPEATABILITY (446 PPM)
INTVRL
THIS PROGRAM IS USED TO DETERMINE A CONFIDENCE
IUTERVAL FOR THE 1-lEAl'l OF A SET OF DATA US III G
THE '2" STATISTICS,..ENTER DATA POINTS
G:
0 ~30 5 "25 25 r5 ~5 10 10 5 ~10 5
MORE? 11
0 "30 5 "25 25 ~5 ~5 10 10 5 "10 5
12 VALUES ENTERED
ENTER PERCENT DEGREE OF CONFIDEIJCE( USUALLY 95°/o)
H:
95
EUTER T STATISTIC VALUE FOR T(0.025 . 11)
D:
2.201
2.201
MEAN VALUE = ~1.25
STANDARD DEV=15.24422394
95o/o CONFIDENCE INTERVAL FOP THE MEAN VALUE
~10.93578311
-------
RESPONSE TIME TEST
Up Scale Down Scale
15 Seconds 120 Seconds
15 " 90
15 " 90 "
Average = 15 Seconds Average = 100 Seconds
Response Time = 100 Seconds
environmental science and engineering, inc.
-------
APPENDIX A-2
(CONTINUED)
environmental science and engineering, inc.
-------
,,,..) j >t 1 1 1 < 1 •
j'cO •»<> ' 60 1 70 *0 50
r~ • H : : i' ''
t— — i i •
i! • '.,. : i) .' i'l'r
1 • : •
t • i
« 50
: i
! ' '
i ' i
i • i '
1 • i
: i :'| !
i ;
•30 :
i i
! 1
! !
1' :
1 ;
10
••l-.-'-i
• i ;
:l -!
i
0
1 :
10 ; 201 30 ! -»0
9D 100
-------
-------
•100 90 30 1
70 ' 80 90 : 10D
-------
tttfE (l-ll-7s)
^*
-------
—* rz.fl>
041 -
10
100
-------
-------
•
!
_
:
i
!- •
:ii!l-
'• i ! i : i i ' ! " j - ! ;
M i i i-M i i i j.
; i • : ; ; i ' . • i • M
. :i j • i j i ! : i : M- ' !
: ! !' ! • i : M. ; i := !
. , II
,5ec.
T -
M
.
...pu«tE ___ ___ ; __ L._ _______
-------
i.l«._olu'iC01
SIAKT TIM
JVTEKVAL LLNGTH 15 APPLICAjlCN
VHS
3858"" ........
9V9 9V9
STOP Tll-iP
IG/"l/73 — I6':
LALt 1 MTLP.VffTS LiVER/UNDEP IftTtP.VALS
. / .'
HISSING INTERVALS
CriANKtL B
3:30
' 0 9/ i/73
U
COOOCU02
CHANNEL C '
10/7/73 2i:i5
0 9/ 5/73 19:30
i a 5 :
-------
v, 1 U 0
I lyi 0
C t' U 0
« "ft " *; ' 0
j (I 0 0
v, !'• y 0
s/ C 0 C
.. .. .-T . .„.._ .. r.
,h-l6 INTERVAL Lt.VOTh 15 Af-PLK. NuS. 999 999
: 9V9
U 0
U
J
0
u
0
0
-(J-
0
0
0.
0
0~~~
8868
°
U
C
U
0
0
u
0
u
0
0
c
0
"""o
0
0
r
8968
0
'(.MAN
0
u
U
u
0
o
0
B APP
0
0
0
0
. 0
- ~0 -
0
0
2
U
0 k
0
u
b
u
0
0
1
NO.: 599 .
0 r, 0 L
0
0
0
0
b"
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
u
0
0
c
0
0
c
0
0
6688
0
C
0
0
u
u
0
0
0
r
C
o
0
c
0
0
8888
0
LHAH C APPLK
U P T*°rp
» 11-13
2* 24- 26
3«i 36 3S
.3* __3C . 30
2 5 b ^t
106.7 if If. (T)t
;.;1>
i i
. KC.s 1
< \ t 36
It 17 16. 15
.26 .. 29 ._J1 ^ 22
_^7 ..23 .. 17.. jt
itoo 7 b 17 ^S
^A7 ^ «,! ^
.64 13 2 j ..b.3b8 .._. C
T '
22
32
5
y/o^-j
6 9 US
.LA/KH til.
2i
U
Jc . .
0/ftl
VI t* 'I
-------
IP PIP 01C
0
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
p
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
in
0
u
c
" o
0
0
c
" 0
0
o
0
0
0
0
c
. 0
o .
0
0 """
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
c
c
0
0
•n
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
p
0
0
0
c
c
0
0
0
0
0
p
0
0
0
0
0
0
p
0
0
0
0
f-
CHAN
2*0
255
246
233
243
240
247
23D
-233.
220
220
221
224
212
2?6
.230
0
60
97
19U
271
342
359
3R2
34 6
403
36 U
374
. 9 _
0
C. APPLIC. NC.:._. _
tp90v
8? ?6? 2f>5
236
241
243
228
230
263
237
243
235
22JL
>
221
214
212
225
215
230
o"
02
111
205
342
362
3V9
2l>9
360
6
0
0
["
87
cc
87
64 .
8t>
8*
95
75
86
77
7J_
;«£*
^
r .. :sj
C3 0 i *
(J>4 2-J'
(J3f>2»-'
\J6 o'
<.36t»"^
. 0
0
2*5
242
245
2t4
253
2i>3
232
243
232
?',?
IBO
224
2CC
2C7
?10
202
iO
'242
•' 0
'u"
212
0
314
3V7
?09
3i.l
4
0
0
t
227
K
219
2CS
214
212
2«i4
0
72
197
..?3C
3<24
341
374
363
3vO
...335
0
D.
0
T
LA/biv UAIL
E4 ??o r '-,
-------
-•
0
C'
— c
j
o'
c
01* 01'
»• f *r
n
r>
•--• p
r
" P
r»
,7""
0
f:
^7c01 Oo6.tld
Hit. NO.: <»y<
0
c
V
o
c
- o •
c
u
u
0
0
0
«j
P
0
l>
p
p
0
0
u
o
U
0
0
0
0
u
u
U
0
INTFRVAl Lt\OTH
0
n
P
o
P
r
0
P
0
0
0
0
i.
0
o
u
0
0
0
0
0
0
r,
p
o —
p
n
n
P
0 ~
0
0
p
I*
JWJ
0
c
c
0 "
u
o ~
u
u
u
0
0
0
APPLK.
APHllC
00
0
p
ft "
p •
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
u
u
0
u
u
o
NCS.
. KU.
0
0
p
0
" 0
0
0
c
0
0
0
995 9V9
0 C
0
u
0
u
0
u
0
— 0
-.-.0. ....
0
p
p
p
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.. 1
0
0
u
'o
0
" 0
0
0
u
0
0
0
p
p
0
0
0
p
0
0
0
0
CHAN C
303 20*
*77 272
302 3U9
<:7n 272
c8v 291
i.77 278
263 293
APPLIC. ^c.:
100 ?U8
ca
87
9o
99
91
101
•?. L
2u3 .
2t7
274
" 2fc5
291
-, t
- 1
«:?! 2o3
316 207
«i84 2V6
305 319
«:7V 2bl
291 2fa3
2^V ..229
ifl5 2b5
jr., •) <-, n
--
9fc
.VV
94
97
9S
97
Kt
3t2
3C7
2S'»
<>•?
216
_5- T
T 1 t > , » .
—It g/O»^'
2'
ic
lb
U... ...
14
U
i
4
•
0
0
c
o
u
C
V.
0
C"
0
u
o
•J
i.
V-
0
v>
p
p
c
c
. .. .y- .
r
0
p —
0
p
0
0
I1
o
— p—
p
u
r
0
w
u
0
c
0
• c
u
"" C J
0
u
0
0
- — 'J-
J
**
— u •
0
u
u
0
0
0
p
''
"p"
p
u
n
n
0
o •
0
0
r
0
p
p
0
J
0
0
0
0
u
u
u
u"
0
"0"
0
I/
u
o
"0
0
0
0
u
p
0 '"
p
0
p
c
0
u
p
c
0
.... 0 ..
0
p
u
p
p
0
u
n
0
0
0
u
0
(J
"0"
o
u
0
u
t
0
0
-y __
u
u
0
'0
0
u
p
0
0
0
0
n
0
f)
P
0
P
P
P
P
P
\i
C
n
0 ~~
0
n
0
u
0
u
0
13
0
0
0
0
T)
0
0
0
u
J
0
u
o •
0
0
0
0
p
p
p
0 "
0
0
o
0
0"
0
0
n ~
0
•p •••••
0
u
0
n
0 "
p
0
0
0
u
u
0
u
- _._
0
0
u
0
0
u
— 0"~
0
0
u
u
0
0
u
c
u
0
0
p
0 .
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
p
0 "
p
rj
0
u
n
• o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
u
0
0
u
0
0 "
u
0"
0
0
0
u
u
f,
0
0
0
p
p
0
0
p
0
0
0
p
0
()
0
- p
p
r
0
c
0
0
0
u
u
r
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
- 0
0
c
u
0
u
u
0
0
u
0
f
p
p
0
0
c
0
p
p
0
p
0
0
p
0
0
(T
p
0
0
0
p
p
0
A
2f 0 261
<£7b 2bO
c7U 273
27> 271
190 262
*5l 265
t64 ?66
260 ?67
271 269
<:60 259
if>S 268
it 3 "2o5
271 270
<7H 2/6
257 "259
t57 2b2
•.«.,« •> s j*
55
92
10L'
93
9o
93
90
91
°4
Vi
P7
94
91
90
95
eo
" 88
85
Cb
p, s
y f 7
2c4
2S1
256
2V9
262
266
2tC
266
268
269
2o9
26f
236
253
252
265
*71-~271
28b 264
295 2b1
26u 262
i?1, 276
Jfrb 26^
266 2o5
27.2 2M1.
269 2o7
2fO 260
26:> 2c3
<:?:'> 2V6
2fcl> 2t6
^61 256
2?7 260
*F5 259
t-ji 251
26o 267
>fM "> f , '
9v
9fc
87
V5
°7
9C
91
89
R9
95
t-
91
89
fi*
276
2o5
?~n
27S
2C5
2/7
3i2
2c3
2t5.
2U1
iul
277
2C2
271
272
2s4
2iO
253
2^4
256
F f *Ww'vJ*i
X i.i
u
It
14
;«
t
•^
SL W«/tA/-
«, . ^v**
«
2t
Ic
1C
Is
It
e
t
<<
-------
P
CHAN' P
0
0
0
P
0
u
0
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
. 0
0
0
u
0
u
0
0
o •
o .
APPLU.
APPLIC
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
u
c
0
u
0
MS.
. NCI.:
0
0
0
" 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 .
0
VV9
999
0
0
0
0
0
0
u
o
0
0
0
0
9V9
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
n
' 0
. 0
n
6
1
0
0
.. o ... .
u
0
0
u
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
. 0
0
.CHAN C APPL1C
31 U 304 98
314
3?0
302
293
306
296
306
297
314
306
308
101
lOb
114
1C(J
20C 96
215 104
?98 96
2'/S 9b
311 102
205 106
• .NT.'... .1...
_3J* 3l.0_
312 314
2VE 301.
315 3?4
318. i.9&...
2«,1 297
2S5
31S
316
311
3C8
2*4
i.97 .
. 316
31!>
..311 ..
312
310
3 rn i-
1C3
~105 "
-.ICt
97
96
K9 .
ICt
. 1C4_.
116
Sfc
329 22
2CS 2t .... . . .
2<,e ic
2C6 U ...
2V2 14
2o8 U
2C8 1C
j'js e.
221 . t
2«,9 4
u
C
-
I
0
•• o
0
-
'J
-
0
0
. ..-£
0
•-
-- c
P
0
', •
c
0
0
0
u
C'
t
o
0
u
0
0
0
0
' 0"
o
0
0
"°
-.— o
c
l<
0
0
0
0
0
u
0
- '0 •
• — o
0
U
0
o
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
0 .
0
0
• o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
'C
0
0
u
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
" " D
o
0
0
0
o ' '
0
0
0
u
.0
0
0
u
0
0
u
u
0
0
""" 0
0
0
0
' 0
" o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
u
0
u
0
0
u
0
0 "
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
u
0
. ... ^..
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
... 0 .
0
0
0
. 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
. 0
. 0
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
2*U
25
265
..3C2..
299
3CO
291 2v6
25b 5^0
. 374
296
291
zC7
277
207
. 299
2'/r
.. 409
306
290
276
2i,2
..301
ici
<••»
..— 90
1C3
ICO
C4
9v
94
C f
102
2^7 it- r^-tnH-
2C3 It.
' ? (r *"- ?(j
2t5 It
. 296 .U -1-. . _..
276 14
28C 12
•> . •> 1 1
269 6
2t7 fc
2a3 4
2 1 7 . . 2 . ._
f 0
. u n
11 " ^ D
c r>
o r i
y • • 0
u r>
. 0
•0"
0
- o
0
u
U' '"
u
0
u
0
•0-
0
0"""
n
\j
0
0 .
• J
n
0
0
u
0
u
u
u
0
n
0 .
D ' '
0
0
0
0
o
0
o ~
n
0
0
0
u
_0 ....
0
u
"C " "
u
0
u
(i
0
0
0
u
0
0
" 0"
n
D
0
0
0
0
0 .......
0
. ..0 ....
0
u
• ' o:
u
... 0 ....
0
0
f)
0
0
0
0
0
u
P -
0
0
0
0
u
0
0
u
o •
"(T •
0
• o
0
0
n
0
0 .
n
0
0
(.'
"0 '
0
0
0
J
0
0
0
u
u
u
0
or"'
0
-. Q.. . ..
0
0
0
0
0
0
n
0
0
• o
0
0 '"
0
0
0
c
u
u
0
0
0
0
0
J
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
" 0
0
c
0
0
0
28U
294
29b
31 9
iR6
£t 1
290
289
297
"302"
277
297
300
347
287
2b2
2a7
293
3C9
306
94
ill
99
9>
107
in
100
9 /
?C7
2<»2
3Cfl
274
27'.'
219
2^4
301
rir
103
2«1
294
297
ifil
214
299
j
-------
i.1; Oi?-
'MfVJuPl Po6jlb INTERVAL
CM,>>.' A f.PPUC. uP. :
V
u
0
u
..I
•J
l<
u
o
u'
_
u
v;
L
0
0
" U
o
-
1 i
0
\ I
P
n
D
r>
P
n
0
0
U
r
n
0
n
0
t
u
o
0
u
0
0
u
0
'0
0
(J
0
Q
0
u
0
"C
C1
1
0
0
0
0
o
0
n
n
n
o —
n
0
n
0
0 "
0
o
0
u
0
9V"
0
0
0
u
0
u
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
• o
u
0.
u
0
"0"
u
0 •
I.I
0
0
" o "'
0
n
0
0
0
0
0
— o —
0
0
0
0
0
0
u
0
0
0
f
Ci
0
0
u
0
0
0
0
u
0
li
0
0
0
0
0
0
u
u
0
UNO
n
p
"~ p"
n
0
0
0
f:
0
n
0
0
c
0
0
n
d"
p
u
p
0
TH 1?
CHAN
0
u
U
0
0
0
u
u
0
0
u
0
u
u
0
u
0
0
0
0
u
u
7" "o '
u
AJ-PLK. KoS
r
0
0
0
p
0
0
0
0
0
0
o'
n
0
0
0
0
p
0
p
u
0
' 0
0
iPPI. 1C..
0
u
(J
0
0
0
0
u
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
u
0
0
0
n
"0
0
0
0
0
" c
n
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
(J
0
c
n
. 999 9V9
.:.9V9
0 C
0
0
u
u
0
0
0
0
0
u
0
0
0
(1
u
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
p
0
' 0
c
0
• o
0
r
0
0
0
n
0
n
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
n
l
c
0
. o
c
. -.0
0
u
0
c
0
0
0
0
0
t)
0
u
0
d
0
0
u
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
c
. 0
p
0
•
0
0
n
,0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
. .CHAN C
3M 3o4
264
327
3SU
273
.383
376
..-
tJj
357
36U
354
3-5*
365
37b
357
342
327
"2
?69
. 392
371
352
374
367
379
367
360
348
APHL1C
360
357
365 .
.356
..415
..130
124
1 1 7
11 1.
116
1 1 tl
111
lip
117
120
116
113
. . NG
3c9
247
2c7
330
117
..3V?
-27C
376
350
371
3fc2
'ti.
309
354
343
37V
356
262
334.
340
4 Oc
497
..374
3P4
361
374
369
354
3*30
362
I "...
384
37"
. 359
352
"~3s9
.276
364
3*7
•> t f
-367
3*5
353
. 373
3dl
363
37L
373
340
344
35fc
58V
.350
351
3 ' i
"~343
124
- 120
11s
.--1H
12C
1 1 S
122
.. 12C
ICb
1 ?x
!??
113
113
3ii6
Soft
346
345
3/7
3«5
2t4
-376
3c7
'fc?
357
._346
375
35«2
343
..LA/hK It,
2 1.
20
Id
J t . . . f
1 ,.
U, J( T"
c
4
j '
U
14
i (
c
t
4
£
0
u •-
t.
u
0
u
1
0
0
p-
n
0
0
0
0
0
1 ' 0
y-
0
u
-_ ....y.
0
0
u
0
1 0
0
n
0
1;
t) - —
0
0
n
n
0
0
0
u
0
— 0'
0
0
0
\J
c,
0
0
0
0
•
n
0
0
0
(1
f)
0
u
0
u
L
u
0
u
0
0
0
0
-p—
0
0
n
u
0"
0
• ' 'TT'
n
u
f.
0
u
0
u
0
Q"
0
0
y
1)
p
"0 '
0
0
0
~ 0
0
— o •
0
u
f)
u
0'
0
u
0 "
0
u
u
li
0
0
0
u
u
0
0
0
0
p
0
r-
0
..._ -0
0
u
0
u
0
0
u
u
(1
fl
0
" " 0
0
0
0
^
0
" o
n
0
n
• 0
0
c
Q.
0
u
0
0
0
c
0
n
0
"0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
p
0
0
;4o
352
33>
341
326
Z'i'l
Il3
jie
346
360
2C1
329
339
330
331
311
332
317
*l ' *t
llH
121
101
109
106
KC
344
3J6
349
363
340
~3<:7
315
¥\l
34b
350
ISb
331
32<;
321,
jit
323
354
345
367
35?
34?
314
i ( '',
111
111
121
114
111
U4
13'j
" IOC
123
• ( C.
346
3/1
31?
334
?,3
3J9
341
310
314
312
? 1 ':
it
U
li.
14
.1C ...
o
6
t
-------
I1
P-<-6jl<; If.'UKVAL UNCTH.ir flPPLK. MjS
9 9V9
v-ur A
u
^
y
J
• o •
0
I
0
- ;i -
t
^
i./
V
w
. t .__
0
t
w
L, ...-
L
u - •-
L
i)
P
n
i'
c
p
p
c
0
"0
•n
t
0
p-
p
n
!|
0
r
•c
r
0
•n
p
c
p
f;
0
0
0
0
•-TT
0
«OPU
0
0
L
. ..0
0
u
• o
u
0
U
0'
u
0
o
o
0
c
u
• - -o
u
. 0
0
0
0
0
u
u
u
n
C. «n
c
0
0
. _..n
0
' 0
u
0
- o
0
- o
0
r
-o
p
1 1
o
— - o
0
11
0
— o
n
0
• n
0
o
0
&
— o
p
ft
0
n
.: 9*9
0
0
u
"C '
6
0
u
0
... ...g
0
o ••"
0
0
0
I*
0
0
0
u
0
o
0
0
. .... g.
0
o ••
0
U '"
0 ""
0
o
0
J
M
p
0
0
0
o •
0
p
0 ....
p
'0 ' "'
0
0
p ••••
f)
u
0
0'
0
0
u
0
o
p
p
p —
p
p
0
0
o --•-•
p
n
0
V
n
0
0
c
t»
0
0
(J
0
0
0
0
0
0
u
0
0
c
0
0
•&"••-
0
0
0
u
u
0
u
0
u
p
(1
f!
0
p
0
(1
n
0
0
0
0
p
n
r
0
(1
0
r
u
n
0
0
p
n
n
0
0
(1
0
p
0
0
0
CHAN D
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
u
0
0
u
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
0
o
0
'. 0 ' '
0
u
... 0 .
0
0
0
0
0
p
p
0
p
0
I)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
p
0
p
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
p
0
0
(1
0
0
0
p
0
n
APPLK.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
t
0
• u
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
_ _. ..
0
o
0
o ••••
0
o
c
0
NH
0
0
0
p
p
p
0
0
0
p
(1
0
p
p
0
p
0
p
0
0
0
0
c
p
' 0'
p
0
0
('<
0
0
0
0
0
. : 999
0
0
0
"u
0
0
0
0
0
0
' 0
0
0
u
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
u
0
0
0
" 0
0
"•'"• U .
0
0
0
0
0
..... .^
0
• "o
0
0
"c
0
" "o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
n
0
r
" o ""
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 "
0
0
0
c
0
c
0
0
0
0
0
c'"
o
c
u
c
<*' .
u
0 ' "
0
0
0
o
0
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
p
0
p
p
0
0
'o
0
0
0
()
0
p
0
c,
0
0
0
0
p
0
0
0
0
p
0
c
0
p
0
11:
.CHAN
479
47V
51
321
515
490
432
304
40'*
280
336
463
4C.V
450
442
444
422
17>
154
380
4fV
710
401
.pp.j...
369
1 f. ••
.C .APPL1C
4JJL 4.7.3.
459
4t>0
503
601
452
511.
_4.77...
439
429
343
'519
?10
462
466
458
4<«1
443
421
319
407
471
3i|C
390
..3J.P...
36f.
**l r r
420
451
39
441 4>f...nt» . 4ct i(.
^f)S 473 4rC *•>''• 1 :•
1" r'.l "'; **] jf
-"- i '-'• -- 1;. •"•'-• «, Ttrto-
J14..511..521 .Lib t
J12 5o7 'j(,c 507 4
503 501 485 464 v,E 5 l\lf~r
if-j Zi't 4^1< 214 1^,
503 4b5 4C2 4L3 477 4c5 li
_4f-t 452 457 4t5. L . . ..
449 447 44t 444 4
4SO. . 43G 42V . 440 ...x .
442. .442 ...444. 442 .TL...V71 ir-t
4?4 437 429 444 e s.
13V IV? fcV 512 2,
393 232 ;£<, It4 H [""
4?t 4(./- ,.
373 3/4 J72 3tC 4
-------
1
w
O
" 0
u
u
(J
V)
—
U
U
I.
o
*
„/
0
w
— u
u
J
w
I
r: a
p
p
— P
0
p
p
r
p
P
0
0
0
f <
'
p
p
p
n
P
P
c
r
0
p
. C
0
0
10«>2u01
066 Jib
INTfkVAL LtNGTH
A^tlC. HO.? 9V9
G
0
0
0
0
t
u
u
c
"' C
0
j
u
u
0
0
o •••
0
u
u
0
0
0
u
t,
v
. j..
0
L"
0
\l
0 0
TT
p
0
n
n
P
P
P
0
0
0
'0
P
II
P
0
P
0
p
0
p
p
p
p
p
0
0
n
0
n
u
0
0
J
0
u
t)
0
u
c
0
0
0
0
0
"0
0
0
u
0
u
0
0
— o
u
u
• o
0
u
[ 1
f)
0
0
... 0 ..
p
p
p
0
p
0
0
p
b
0
0
P
P
0
I'
0
o •
0
0
0
p
p
0
0
. .-...p _. .
0
0
u
• n
0
u
u
0
0
0
u
0
0
c
0
0
'o'""
J
u
0
0
0 '
u
0
u
0
0
0" "
u
0
u
0 "
0
C"" "
0
0
1
1
D APPL1
C., MiS.
CHAN P. APPL1C. NO.!
«
0
P
P
0
C
0
p
0
p
p "•••
0
0
0
0
0 ' "
0" '"
0
'I
p
p
0
c
0
0
o
0
u
c "~
p
0 --- —
0
u
n
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
u
0
0
"0
0
0
0
0
0
u
J
u
u
0
0
u
n
p
0
p
p
p
0
0
0
0
0
p
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
n
0
'""0
0
p
0
b
o
0
0
0
0
.-_ 0 ... .
0
0
n
0 0
u
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
u
c
0
0
0
0 '
0
0
0
u
0
0
0
M
0
0
0
p
p
0
0
0
0
p
0
0
b'""'
0
p
p
0
ft
p
0
0
0" "
0
0
u
0
0~
0
u
0
0
0
0
u
n
999
999
0
0
0
0
..u
0
u
u
u
0
0
0
0 ...
0
u
0
u
0 "
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
- o •
0
• -0 -
0
u
u
u
" 0
0
'0
ll
999 .„.!
0
0
0 .
0
0
0 '
0
0
c
0
0
0
..0 .. _.
0
0
0
__Q
0
0
p
0
c
0
0
~ o ' "
C
0
(J
0
0
" 0
0
0
n
0
0
u
0
0
0
0
u
0
0
0
g
0 .
c
0
0
0
0
u
c
li
0
0
0
c
u
0
0~
u
0
0
u
0
u
0
ri
0
p
0
0
p
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
. _0
c
0
0
_. o
0
"0
o
r
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 '
0
0
.. IHAN.
12b
5b
52
67
70
402
475
464 .
441
420 .
410
, 4C1 _
41U .
407
J95
40b
42o
439
\2°>
.<•!*_..
413
406
41V '
395
39*
453
420
366
534
S-T
C ..
125
65
5?
71
7f.
4b3
475
430
440
427
410
-39.A
410
404
<<()?
413
424
440
420
405
^20
401
420
405
404
391
407
476
414
39C
296
455
e ' 7
0PPLIC..M2
122 114
. . 5b
71
.77
463
474
44V
445
412
.413
J93
403
414
.. 403
440
414
430
414
424
401
423
409
4Ci
383
4lb
490
191
467
490
"*
42
70
.91
481
476
. 444
-439
414
ii.9.
.418
292
409
3V3
"4c5
4*4
4C7
. .425
^•23
" 401
4C4
430
501
210
4oC
1VC
4 o 5"
570
f f 'A
.
JLC!
4n
.. ..60
. 303
4»>0
476
..43o
3*4
- 426
412
400
.412
395
423
"437
420
405
402
4C-5
41t>
417
"401
379
441
3frb_
" 432
122
1.30
1 1. •'
94
47
66
469
479
472
3*1
-.415
410
4i.O
.-389
397
41 h
433
430
4^3
399
.. .''01
408
411
415
3V8
366
*'£
J^2VO
4/5
3i9
r <-i ~>
1\~
47
7C
. 4C5
43S
475
-4le
414
.411
lif'd
392
4Ct
-43^
43J
411
399
_39t
4C9
42C
" 4CC
3r.t
"444"
bCt
4Ct
51- J
522
C P ''
il ,
4P
. 67
71
479
. 4J2
413
..411
413
t,i.e.
-.401-
394
422
4i2
. 399
415
4CO_
422
4CC
39C
4<3
572
1/2
44t
s!c
5«:2
------
i I. / r~
22
?,
It
U
12
K . .
L
<,
£
FK »/ls/-»-
2 2
2C
1 U
n
,. j
1,:' JL i"
lf_ TCTrt-
c
4
-------
APPENDIX B-l
environmental science and engineering, inc.
-------
Plant
CMnL
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE ANJ ENGINEERING. INC.
•* SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
Mat'! Processing Rate_
JS7»'/,Nomograph C
Stack Dimensions
Stack Area /01 '' b/f\
/
0, ? 3
Effective Stack Area
Stack Height /.5"< '
Final Gas Meter Reading
Initial Gas Meter Reading_
Condensate Increase in Impingers
Moisture in Silica Gel —
Silica Gel Container No.
tiOrsat: %C02
_ft
ml
T^>
3
- Filter No. —
•2 -
XN
% Excess
Air
Test Conducted By:
8.
Sample Train Leak Check
Remarks:
CFM
ice
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
1
1
Distance
From Inside
Stack Wall
(in.)
Clock
Time
•
ll'^lb
/2 : o-o
&'•'*
/2:?>0
/I' 4$
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
1^.42£
2C13.?>
loirj
-
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING. INC.
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
Sampling Location &EffWST€£ <
Type of Control
Type of Samples "bOy
Date C//M/73 Run No' -^ &
Time Start /I AS Time End /2
.Sample Time 6 & min/pt (*&
DB/£?°F, WB tf/ °F. VP 9 DP ,2^
Bar. Press. ,^>S"7"Hg, Stack Press. ^
Moisture. 2Z%, FDA .^'/Gas Density
\TQtt
-
v/ jf
Total min
7% "Hg
TflSt "Hg
Factor
Weather CLG^D1?
Temp. ff.'T'F, W/D , W/S
Sample Box No. Meter Box No.
Meter AH@ 27. Pitot Corr. Factor
Nozzle Dia. '/^ in., Probe Length
Probe Heater Setting 15% Nomograph 'C^
Stack Dimensions / &} " £>!/}.
Stack Area
Effective Stack Area
Stack Height /£>
CFM
A//r
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
-
Distance
From Inside
Stack Wall
(in.)
Clock
Time
I!'-**
12 • W
IT. if
/^:3^
/:>•>•
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
aw.Kd
/02-I
'//O • (^
//R.y
/{tf.2?7
^ Pli'k
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
.2%
.1$
.2%
.;>•*
- 1-
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
("H20)
Calc.
/
/$&
S.30
/•??
l>^
Actual
/.3O
/3Q
/.so
/-?•(
Stack Gas
Temp.
(°F)
Jb&
/t>9
/(e*
/(•*
Gas Sample
Temp.@Dry
Gas Meter
(°F)
In
??
n
t?
/L'C
Out
/<>/
/»/
/Ol
Ik-
Sample
Box
Temp.
(°F)
—
—
—
—
Last
Impinger
Temp.
(°F)
—
—
.,__
—
Vacuum
on
Sample
Train
("Hg)
.Z
z
7
-7
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, INC.
•KsviBH FlcMB
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
piant COASTAL c/4zm. £ot??.
Sampling Location E> £/?/ /STt £ &Tf\ O 2_
Date ?////?? Run No. Jl A
Time Start J: 2~ ^71 me End -4:22 P^
Sample Time /£ £> min/pt £?£) Total min
DB/u^'F, WB ?Y0F, VP @ DP -^.Ll~l^ "Hg
Bar. Press. J??. fr'f"Hg, Stack Press. 2?, £'? "Hg
Moisture. ??-%, FDAM?),^Gas Density Factor
Weather 2!/l/C£45>7
Temp. ^5r°F, W/D , W/S
Sample Box No. Meter Box No. ~j
Meter AH@ A'T^ Pitot Corr. Factor 0-^3
Nozzle Dia. '/4- in., Probe Length ~ (f ft
Probe Heater Setting /Jv^Nomograph Cr . ^^7
Stack Dimensions /O? 3>i 'r in
Stack Area ft2 .
Effective Stack Area ft
Stack Height /5"5^ ft
/?CjA) fF 1$
Mat'l Processing Rate
Final Gas Meter Reading
Initial Gas Meter Reading
3 £% 3^?- ft3"
5^C..7^7ftl
Condensate Increase 1n Implngers ml
Moisture 1n Silica Gel
Silica Gel Container No.
Orsat: %CO,
7o\) /)
*^O . .
% Excess
Air
qm
Filter No.
Test Conducted By: h , ///CN^O
B>
Sample Train Leak Check
ti)£)& ^~TlLf?
fi , &O CFM
i/;
Remarks: / 1> /fl/Aj. r^R&L, /iflL£ A
(3 ozinctL A/-/-?
-73
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
Distance
From Inside
Stack Wall
(in.)
Clock
Time
,^.2-a
3:3?
3-'^,'H'
r VO
-------
aTnesvineFlo
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
piant COASTAL CULM, cotr.
Sampling Location 2> £ A9 / 5T£"/f 57"/)0/<
Type of Control
Type of Samples £T02
Date ?////7_? Run No. ^ ^ I
Time Start 3:2*2. Time End "T; 2- "2-
Sample Time u 0 min/pt &?0 Total min
DB °F, WB °F, VP G> DP "Hg
Bar. Press. .2. • /I*-* it .
Condensate 'Increase in Impingers ml
Moisture in Silica Gel
Silica Gel Container No.
Orsat: %C00
A>Urt
%co
%No
% Excess
Air
Test Conducted By: 6" •
gm
Filter No.
/nc^r
U>QlCtiTF£
Sample Train Leak Check
O.frO CFM
. Remarks: ' /5 WAI. -pc/A'(2£ /?/r7"£/C'
C^V 6gm^
4'til
4:1^
Gas Meter
Reading
/3^,7fr
/V3-7
/r/. /;
1*1,4
767^7
^ P(^/?G>
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
,25"
,2.S"
,^*T
,25"
s
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
("H20)
Calc.
A/5"
\ AS
/.&
I- IS
Actual
7,/r
/•/^
/'/>"
A /5
Stack Gas
Temp.
(°F)
/t?
J(r>*
'/(OX
/^^
J»
Gas Sample
Temp.@Dry
Gas Meter
(°F)
In
/o/
/o/
/<70
tit>
Out
^:
/02
/o/
/&/
Sample
Box
Temp.
(°F)
—
— -
—
.
Last
Impinger
Temp.
(°F)
— •
—
— .
— .
Vacuum
on
Sample
Train
("Hg)
2
2
2
z.
-------
ti'lVIROMMENTAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, INC.
FlMfe
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
Plant ("OAsrAL Cllf/ft. COtf'f.
Sampling Location Pt^tylZTC/? STACK
Type of Control
Type of Samples ^>O-z.
Date 9/H/73 Run No. . ? /f
Time Start ^-'S^^Time End b'-3t> 'f^
Sample Time foO min/pt ^0 Total min
DB /£? °F, WB W °F, VP 0 DP -2^7$ "Hg
Bar. Press. 3f. Sf "Hg, Stack Press. 2*1. tf "Hg
Moisture -^2%, FDA ,^f /]/ Gas Density Factor
Weather <9\J t'# MS 7~
Temp. SS^F, W/D , W/S
Sample Box No. Meter Box No. "7
Meter AH@ /.#0 Pitot Corr. Factor O-^>^
Nozzle Dia. V*J- in., Probe Length (o ft
Probe Heater Setting /5/^Nomograph Cf '^y
Stack Dimensions jO'Ji -^/-> in
Stack Area ft2 .
Effective Stack Area ft2
Stack Height /^> 5" ft
^rjrff C-. ^y O
/^ //x / J?^1 / /)
Mat'l Processing Rate
Final Gas Meter Reading ^7
7.7/4 ft3?
Initial Gas Meter Reading 366. 5b # ft3S
Condensate Increase in Impingers
Moisture in Silica Gel
ml ^>
5m S
Silica Gel Container No. Filter No.
Orsat: %C00
7o\J f\
*^? . L ,
% Excess
Air
Test Conducted By: £-• lu<.r\nt*
B. WZl
/> it -rf-f*
Sample Train Leak Check 6). cT£) CFM
. Remarks: ^ /5 ^?/Aj p<^^&(^ ftFC.^ R
& OftlFIti AH~.~T$
•4H
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
Distance
From Inside
Stack Wall
(in.)
Clock
Time
^'3S^"
b-^0
(f'-Og'
Co'.lb
(f'3^
•*
Gas Meter
Reading
366-5bSr
"\i i^- //
3 £.2. 3
3fo.3
3>C\'~1 7 / 'T
pMiec-^r
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
• 2G>
. 2(f>
,2(s
, 2(f
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
("H20)
Calc.
,"75^
•7^
• 75T
>"?^
Actual
.75^
.75^
j jT"
.7±
Stack Gas
Temp.
/ d>%
/ (fty
I b%
tt/'ti
»
Gas Sample
Temp.@Dry
Gas Meter
In
93
?'/
^Y
^2
Out
9s~~
^.*r
^
? c
Sample
Box
Temp.
—
—
_
-
Last
Impinger
Temp.
—
—
— . -
_-
Vacuum
on
Sample
Train
("Hg)
.5
^
5"
.er^
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL
RING, INC.
.SCIENCE ANDENGINEER.
Gl^Wre vil^^^Fl oi^iP
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
r i ui i u *•— • *-s*t _j i /7 *— ^-/ ' *— ' / v w ( * «
Sampling Location '^t-MfST'k'/Z. ^SfflcK
Type of Control
Type of Samples SO-i.
Date I/ it 173 Run No. 3 "£"
Time Start ^j'^h P^'Time End to- ~5t> ^>'';i
Sample Time /£ 0 min/pt 6?D Total min
DB /£#°F, WB •?/ °F, VP @ DP ."2-^75 "Hg
Bar. Press J??, ff? "Hg, Stack Press. <29, 8? "Hg
Moisture -c^^%, FDA/??J,^Gas Density Factor
Weather O^tgcA^T"
T^rw« ^~ /_ or n/n I.I/C
Temp. Q i) r, w/u , w/b
Sample Box No. Meter Box No. /
Meter AH@ ?,• 2- Pitot Corr. Factor (5-^3
Nozzle Dia. /V in., Probe Length t? ft
Probe Heater Setting /5%Nomograph Cf • W
/ A // "T~7~i
Stack Dimensions / O2 -*-,^, in
Stack Area ft2 .
Effective Stack Area ft2
Stack Height / Z> £ ' ft
^ /9S
<5^^?t
/T^A; ^ IA
Final Gas Meter Reading 207, /5"6. ft3
Initial Gas Meter Reading /7&*J~(p4 ft3_
Condensate- Increase in Impinqers ml
Moisture in Silica Gel gm
Silica Gel Container No. Filter No.
Orsat: %CO,
*"2 •• • •
%CO
%N0
% Excess
Air
Test Conducted By: G' /^C^nt
/n /VA
Sample Train Leak Check C/. C7c> CFM
. Remarks: 3< /5^/^/A/ Pdf?6C' ApT£-^
& Oi^/flCf 4Af = /./S
?/,//*/
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
Distance
From Inside
Stack Wall
(in.)
Clock
Time
5l35f/,
tf^'D
L'.ocr
(o'.^O
k '• 3.5
Gas Meter
Reading
ITS. 41,4
ly?.^
/Q /. 2-
/ 9 cl ' 2.
^07, i5^>
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
f^Z(J,
• 2b
• 2.(?
, A(,~>
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
("H20)
Calc.
U*
1.1%
l
Actual
//$"
A /^
I i V
n i o
/. 1 %
Stack Gas
Temp.
/ '£g
1 (f¥>
1 £fr
/(<,-%
*
Gas Sample
Temp.^Dry
Gas Meter
In
99
/ffl
Itft
J9
Out
??
/^
/^
/<)
-------
fll
. INC..
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
Plant CdhSTAL £}j£M. Coi?P.
Sampling Location J>£fll iST&P. -STT}^
Type of Control
Type of Samples SO-i.
Date ?//2/7? Run No. ^f- fl
Time Start y^.'Jxo Time End // '•' 5~S"
Sample Time CfO min/pt ($0 Total min
DB/£#°F, WB &( °F, VP 9 DP -J.% Nomograph Cj- . »T
Stack Dimensions X^-4 ~L>i>, in
Stack Area ft2 .
Effective Stack Area • ft2
Stack Height A5"<" ' ft
sf\w£ A^>
X't/AJ 7^ //4
Mat'l Processing Rate
Final Gas Meter Reading /^^••^/l ft P
Initial Gas Meter Reading / ^3-^^ 7 ft3^'
Condensate- Increase in Impingers ml ?
Moisture in Silica Gel gmc>
Silica Gel Container No. Filter No.
Orsat: 55CO-,
*^2
%CO
%N0
% Excess
Air
Test rnnrliirtpri Rv X? /7^r K f\^L
T*> f ^/PlP LiT'tit
^** * t*^'»\ / vS ft f t—^v
oample irain Leak Check L/ • V u CFM
j+
. Remarks: /jT/^/A/ 7>^/?(3r6' APT&? /?£JAj
(d ofiiFic-C * ft =• > (?3 "rf>d
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
Distance
From Inside
Stack Wall
(in.)
Clock
Time
Jfi'Sf
//'./o
fl'.zf
/(•4b
(1:55
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft3)
/63-#?
no.b
777.7
i^z.i-
iw.rn
X Pmzt
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
.>Z
.22
,^2
,22
£
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
("H20)
Calc.
•^
• 63
• &3
•^5
Actual
, £3
, 63
/k3
,£2
Stack Gas
Temp.
(°F)
/6fr
7^^
/^
/(*%
»
Gas Sample
Temp . @Dry
Gas Meter
(°F)
In
10
?0
90
°l(
Out
11
11
31
V
Sample
Box
Temp.
(°F)
—
—
-
—
Last
Impinger
Temp.
(°F)
—
—
—
— .
Vacuum
on
Sample
Train
("Hg)
f
V,
V
4
/
-------
ai nes v1 l
Plant CWS74L Ctf&n. Cbf??.
Sampling Location ^^/ft/^TTrX;7 STTfcX^
Type of Control
Type of Samples £>Oi_
Date ?/a/73 Run No. ^ B
Time Start /tf.'jTo Time End //-'^TJS
Sample Time <£0 min/pt ^d^ Total min
DB/£?°F, WB fr/ °F, VP @ DP ,3.47% "Hg
Bar. Press. H^ "Hg, Stack Press. 3° "Hg
Moisture. $2%, FDA,^?A^Gas Density Factor
Weather C/.O^V
T^m^ (O'^Tor U/n l.l/C
lemp. i<,> r, w/u , w/o
Sample Box No. Meter Box No. &
Meter AHG> /.3 Pi tot Corr. Factor <0-§'3
Nozzle Dia. /^ in. , Probe Length ^ ft
Probe Heater Setting/y/^ Nomograph Cf ,"/?
' ' -i— ' *
Stack Dimensions /D2> -*-.4>. in
P
Stack Area ft* .
Effective Stack Area ft2
Stack Height /Z'tT ft
-
$f\fflL n ^
ypt/Aj ^ //I
•
Mat'l Processing Rate
Final Gas Meter Reading 0~1 %<~J £''2* ft 7"
Initial Gas Meter Reading 0^1> & & / ft3$
Condensate Increase in Impingers ml /
Moisture in Silica Gel gm \
Silica Gel Container No. Filter No.
Orsat: %C00
*0/>
*^? _..,....
% Excess
Air
Test Conducted By: Q /Y\c((&L
£? / ^o i /*£/f/r&
D, (AJrC 1 (j"n / (-' *»
> >rrs
Sample Train Leak Check O • OQ CFM
1^ l~*t f A -*~ **^ 1
Remarks: )£> /flM r4f?&fc /3F~/t.l£ f(Lli\)
v5> &Q.l£tt£ A ft "= *(D£> "//iD
.&?!
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
Distance
From Inside
Stack Wall
(in.)
Clock
Time
/£ '.SjT
//-/O
H'.lf
// :*fo
I!. $6
Gas Meter
Reading
f)4^.0(p 1
r> £6, • 5"
(f4>Z
071.1
0-1$, 1^
y? puft&t
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
,2"2-
. 11.
. 2 Z
, 2.2
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
("H20)
Calc.
,60
•60
,(p&
, (00
Actual
t (00
, (nb
_^(f>C
, £>o
Stack Gas
Temp.
(°F)
/&%
1(0%
/&%
/(o^
*
Gas Sample
Temp.@Dry
Gas Meter
In
?&
? 9
/GO
/Ol
Out
?»
^?
/Ot>
/O/
Sample
Box
Temo.
_-
—
—
—
Last
Impinger
Temp.
—
— •
-
— •
Vacuum
on
Sample
Train
("Hg)
y"
s
y
Ij
'
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND cNGiUEtRIMG, INC.
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
Plant (LoA^TflL CHCm. C-OfP
Sampling Location ~De./Y\lS>~TER S77)Cf£.
Type of Control
Type of Samples SO 2-
Date 9 7/2/73 Run No. £ A
Time Start 3 ' 16 ^Vime End sf-'-Z'Z?**
Sample Time £0 min/pt £>£) Total min
DB °F, WB °F, VP @ DP "Hg
Bar. Press. 3D "Hg, Stack Press. 3d ''Hg
Moisture .^^X, FDA ,*?*?/? Gas Density Factor
Weather CJ-OyJ)*i - ///J-Z-^'r'
Temp. #*f0F. W/D , W/S
Sample Box No. Meter Box No. o
Meter AH@ / 4- Pitot Corr. Factor 0-83
Nozzle Dia. /y in., Probe Length ^/ ft
Probe Heater Setting /b % Nomograph C^ /^T
Stack Dimensions /DJ, -Z--D. in
Stack Area ft .
Effective Stack Area ft
Stack Height I &£> ' ft
ft qi\ & /A
Mat'l Processing Rate
Final Gas Meter Reading 2 3
J2,^5j ft3"P^, „: .
Initial Gas Meter Reading 2OO^O~7 ft3 S"^.'-/"'"'
Condensate, Increase in Impingers
Moisture in Silica Gel
n.0 -*T
"> 3,-^>^7
gm <
Silica Gel Container No. Filter No. :
Orsat: %C00
%00
%CO
*N?
% Excess
Air
'
, -
•
Test Conducted By: Q. /ftctfAt
B Ldftt&HT£:/.£e)7
^o^-S'
l/t.7
224.2.
23z.pi
*?URl£
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
,7^
/2^
-.28-
,-&
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
("H20)
Calc.
•P
•l~2.
,*2.
, &Z
Actual
,«2-
'^2
.8-2
,&2
Stack Gas
Temp.
(°F)
/6y
Jbt
l(o%
/&?>
»
Gas Sample
Temp . @Dry
Gas Meter
(°F)
In
$1
%%
%$
T7
Out
%
?r>
^
2>£
Sample
Box
Temp.
(°F)
—
-
~
—
Last
Impinger
iTemp.
(°F)
—
—
—
—
Vacuum
on
Sample
Train
("Hg)
Vi
f.
y,
^
-------
jtr,/) n lt i 7p • CIXVlKUIil-itHIHL iL-itlNLL HNU ti'lbilNttKlI'lb , iHU
•• ••^/••i/5 BesvlHi FlflM
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
piant CbAstti £#£#), co/er.
Sampling Location 2>£/W/ST£~'& STACK
Type of Control
Type of Samples SO z.
Date ?/A2-/73 Run No. f> B
Time Start Time End
Sample Time (c>0 min/pt fc?0 Total min
DB °F, WB °F. VP G> DP "Hq
Bar. Press. ?£ "Hq, Stack Press. .5 O "Hq
Moisture /"K 2,%, FDA •at°l( uas Density Factor-
Weather CU>KD^ i-SlTM tfftZt-
Temp. £5^°F, W/D , W/S
Sample Box No. Meter Box No. (p
Meter AH@ / ^ Pi tot Corr. Factor £)'$3
Nozzle Dia. X/ in., Probe Length <4 ft
" / ^/rt Y^T w
Probe Heater Setting /6/p Nomograph C^- . //
Stack Dimensions /02 3~£) in
Stack Area ft2 .
Effective Stack Area ft2
Stack Height /"XfT ' ft
t? ft3"
by^.j^i n3
Condensate Increase in Impingers ml
Moisture in Silica Gel
Silica Gel Container No.
Orsat: %CQ^
"^O ..,.,
^^*? . , . . .
% Excess
Air
Test Conducted By: fe-.
gm
Filter No.
Ms- /^A^
/nc*f{ f-)c
B. LdlllGrfrTEfL
Sample Train Leak Check
<$.&£) CFM
. Remarks ^/S'/M/ri. PuR&t' AFTER R.UI
(Q otf/fz/Ct:: A t4 =•
. 7b
3z
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
Distance
From Inside
Stack Wall
(in.)
Clock
Time
?.'2j>
3:40
2-' &
4'-/b
4: *•£
Gas Meter
Readjng
£86>,73/
9^,°\
/03.4
/((.
y/^i1]
^
5^
*?U$£t
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
.1&
/ 2 *&
,2%
i 2%
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
("H20)
Calc.
^}(g_
H(n
•~Hr
ri!*
Actual
t"l(e>
.~l(r>
•l%
j b%
*
Gas Sample
Temp . @Dry
Gas Meter
In
u
%
u
1(0
Out
n
1(o
9(r
94
Sample
Box
Temp.
m
-
—
~
_.
Last
Impinger
Temp.
-
—
~_
—
Vacuum
on
Sample
Train
("Hg)
4,
%.
#
5^
-------
f
A
SCIENCE AND BiGIMEERING. INC.
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
Plant Ct)A$>TAL. GtiCW CO/2P.
Sampling Location DEtfl^Tbfc. STftC )<.
Type of Control
Type of Samp) es — * O i.
Date ?// 773 Run No. b A
Time Start /7^ £Wime End / '%<££
Sample Time £/ min/pt ^/ Total min
DB °F, WB °F. VP 0 DP "Hg
Bar. Press. 3^ "Hg, Stack Press. $Q "H9
Moisture .£2-%, FDA .9^/^Gas Density Factor
Weather tiUtgCfiS'T
Tnmr\ 5^ •< °C U/H M/C
lemp. p y r, w/u > w/o
Sample Box No. , Meter Box No. 5
Meter AH(? /. ^ Pitot Corr. Factor 0,%3
Nozzle Dia. '/J in., Probe Length -^/ ft
Probe Heater Setting I^/Q Nomograph C^r / ^T
Stack Dimensions ) D 3. JTD in
Stack Area ft2 .
Effective Stack Area ft2
Stack Height 1 ££?' ft
SAftZ /rS
P. IA i j*- ^ /i
A^UAJ W J.H
Mat'l Processing Rate
Final Gas Meter Reading Z 72' ££"Z~ ft3"> ^ f n .',
Initial Gas Meter Reading ^40'75^l ft33 "*
Condensate Increase in Impingers ml ( ^ s^fl
Moisture in Silica Gel gm ^
Silica Gel Container No. Filter No.
Orsat: %C00 1
%00
«CO : '
%No
% Excess
Air
Test Conducted By: (?. /^c/P^C
B. tAA/<*.ttT££.
oampie Train Leak Check U* ^^ CFM
. Remarks: £ /5^ ^/^ P"^C-<^ /J^TtT^
>?C/A/ (p 0^/nc.£' ^ A/ r ,76,
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
-
Distance
From Inside
Stack Wall
(in.)
Clock
Time
1* 4J ^
(Q . ^"0
(o'.l^
£>:3&
/ ' ^T S
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft4)
34® - ?( £• oD £*•
^P^^G^
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
,2.^?
.26
.2fo
. 1t>
IEA,' r> {
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
("H20)
Calc.
,lb
•Ik
, 1(0
•76?
\ C~ c
s f~
Actual
nb
>7(o
.76
,7£
-g;.<>'7
Stack Gas
Temp.
(°F)
/^^
/^ ^
J&tf
/&&
,
Gas Sample
Temp.(?Dry
Gas Meter
In
£V
S3
#7
w
Out
G /
C^ t^"^"
CJ' ^_"^'
^^
Sample
Box
Temp.
_
~-
«^
Last
Impinger
Temp.
(°F)
_
—
.*_
Vacuum
on
Sample
Train
("Hg)
*±
^
Y
4*
-------
^-''SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
Plant COftSTAL CtftM. CdKP.
Sampling Location 2) &$) 1 STcT/? S773C/f
Type of Control
Type of Samples oOi,
Date ?/ /7.7 Run No. <£> "B
Time Start f?.^ p%ime End /§<%£
Sample Time &/ min/pt &l Total min
DB °F, WB °F, VP G> DP "Hg
Bar. Press. 3d "Hg, Stack Press. 3O "Hg
Moisture .$2%, FDA ,^7',K3as Density Factor
Weather £>\)cRCft$T
Temp. "53> °F, W/D , W/S
Sample Box No. Meter Box No. 6»
Meter AH@ ./ 3 Pi tot Corr. Factor E),^3
Nozzle Dia. ,^ in., Probe Length -7 ft
Probe Heater Setting /i>" /homograph C* ,"7^
Stack Dimensions /03i Hu>. in
Stack Area ft2 .
Effective Stack Area ft2
Stack Height /S$ ft
^//o & /A
Mat'l Processing
Rate
Final Gas Meter Reading /^/. ^
Initial Gas Meter Reading /2 8*- ^
Condensate Increase in Impingers
Moisture in Silica Gel
y 7O ft3 T7
'62. ft3 5
ml 7
gm ^
Silica Gel Container No. Filter No.
Orsat: %C00
^0? . . .
%N,
% Excess
Air
Test Conducted B
Sample Train Lea
. Remarks: -^ /5
y: Or. ft\M
B, tfXH
k Check ft.
" /?7/A). ?aR6
£ilt\ (£ OKI free &h) -
J -^
y/7££
Ot> CFM
£> /?rrr/e
,11
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
Distance
From Inside
Stack Wall
(in.)
Clock
Time
^^
b:&Q
t:/f
£•'30
b'A^
Gas Meter
Reading
m.&i
1 $(..£'
M. *
!(**
HX
/t>8
»
Gas Sample
Temp . @Dry
Gas Meter
(°F)
In
7°
?Q
J2
W
Out
%?
^?
^2)
??-
Sample
Box
Temp.
(°F)
—
—
—
Last
Impinger
Temp.
(°F)
-
—
—
Vacuum
on
Sample
Train
("Hg)
4
V
i
4-
:. x 5<
-------
IRO
Gainesville, Florida
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
\
Plant COITAL £//£//!, £D«?,
Sampling Location Z>£/!?/£,T£Y? S7?\C>K
Type of Control
Type of Samples S^i_
Date 7/73/7:? Run No. ~7 1\
Time Start /f''^^ Time End /Z'-'tfO
Sample Time » ^ min/pt &•£> Total mi n
DB °F, WB °F, VP G> DP "Hq
Bar. Press. "3"°"Hq, Stack Press. ^£> "Hq
Moisture. \ 1%, FDA/^1% Gas Density Factor
Ueather /^^)/A/— isJ/tJfe'J
T «mn '/ F) *>c i.i/n H/C
lemp. r •, if r , w/u , w/o
Sample Box No. Meter Box No. 6
Meter AH@ J-4 Pitot Corr. Factor (5^3
Nozzle Dia. /^ in., Probe Length -y ft
Probe Heater Setting/^ /^Nomograph C* , ^T
Stack Dimensions /O~t 2Tp in
Stack Area ft2 .
Effective Stack Area ft2
Stack Height /fT^> ft
Arn£ b ^
^P^/Aj yfr ^.A
-
Mat'l Processing Rate
Final Gas Meter Readinq £' / 3 . -'//^ / ft3
Initial Gas Meter Readinq 2'T ^ • -I •" '' ft -
Condensate Increase in Impinqers- .ml
Moisture in Silica Gel gm
Silica Gel Container No. Filter No.
Orsat: XCO«
/oUo
xco
%Hn
% Excess
Air
T»st Conducted By: (£, /)']($?*} (L
CamnlA Tv*a-ln 1 «al/ TUrtol^ /! *< 1 TCM
sample iram LeaK tneck c . -^ ' t/rn
. Remarks: -^ /£T '#/AJ. pt^^f,^ d r~TL
£W £lFIC£ A/-l-,lb
.oil
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
,..-'"'
Distance
From Inside
Stack Wall
(in.)
Clock
Time
,yV6
//••"fr
liJO
/i"ic
/Z1 -k
Gas Meter
Reading
I.KL^-JL
2C/O.J
tf?,]
."#6.3
313/1^7
/ Ft/^t*
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
>lAo
> :. (-
,3t
,'i^
t' ^D
^
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
("H20)
Calc.
n -
.7*
\'((-
n<°
OF /
Actual
• 7f
,76
7^
'76
V//0
Stack Gas
Temp.
(°F)
/(:3
, • — >
/ 0 "»
Ite
/63
j»
Gas Sample
Temp.@Dry
Gas Meter
' (°F)
In
r^
Xt
<~t<- •
?c-
Out
•/, v
r /•'
KC>
7?
Sampl e
Box
Temp.
(°F)
_
__
^,.
~-
Last
Impinger
Temp.
(°F)
—
_-
. —
—
Vacuum
on
Sample
Train
("Hg)
i"**
^..j
5"
S"
5'
-------
^^ . ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING. INC.
VH , HV9 ' MHptvOT FifMH
/ ^04^" fT) /\ 1 r 1 yr^~' ^^* r ric <^ "Hg
Moisture %, FDA , Gas Density Factor
Weather F/) /A) * '^/NbY'
Temp. * ^°F, W/D ^ , W/S ^ .'''•-•/<
Sample Box No. Meter Box No. £p
Meter AH(? //3£> Pitot Corr. Factor O/^S
Nozzle Dia. }/4 in., Probe Length 4- ft
Probe Heater Setting/S'/c- Nomograph Cr ,79
Stack Dimensions in
Stack Area ft2 .
Effective Stack Area ft
Stack Height ft
*z::»
Mat'! Processing Rate
Final Gas Meter Reading / ) ^
Initial Gas Meter Reading 1 k £
Condensate Increase in Impingers
Moisture in Silica Gel
•'-^'^ ft3 -7 . ,
1 .5^7Jf ftj c > ' • '
ml ^ : . ^ J /
gm < 5'"-^.
Silica Gel Container No. Filter No. „ - •
Orsat: SCO,
%CO
*NO
% Excess
Air
Test Conducted By: G-> fi}e
^Mr-
'^ /fl tf~7 f T*
Sample Train Leak Check
^ - r ° CFM
, Remarks: ^ 1^ A1' /J h''^:i' Af'fCtC
jjtifr (t^ bfcinc.t' <
^#~ i7/
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
Distance
From Inside
Stack Wall
(in.)
Clock
Time
": ?4^
/^ib^
/:/fi
/: 2 ',
/: V-6
Gas Meter
Reading
Itf.SK
r/7,-/
i^^.^
MV1
11&W
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
,au
. 5- U
,'2-W
• 2b
£.»•?
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
("H20)
Calc.
^
>ll
•1!
n)
v/r /-'
Actual
•11
,1/
•7/
.^l
//o
Stack Gas
Temp.
(°F)
IM
/t3
/63
/&"?
^
Gas Sample
Temp. @ Dry
Gas Meter
(°F)
In
^/
t>^
v'?.
flt
Out
^
W
^
'//
Sample
Box
Temp.
(°F)
—
—
—
—
Last
Impinger
Temp.
(°F)
—
—
-—
—
Vacuum
on
Sample
Train
("Hg)
5
^
• ,
V
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, INC.
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
Plant r'£WST/)t_ CfjE/n. CO.
Sampling Location ~~J?£7fl ISTCR- -ST7K
Type of Control
Type of Samples ^^x
Date 7/7/7? Run No. %A
Time Start / 7-' 0:> ?'>* Time End /^fc #5
Sample Time 6-0 min/pt (s>& Total
DB °F, WB °F, VP @ DP
Bar. Press. 3° "Hg, Stack Press. B> o
Moisture -^2_%, FDA • r
Meter AH@ /• *f Pitot'.Corr. Factor O,9>
Nozzle Dia. V*j in., Proba Length •"7
K
P O-i
min
"Hg
"Hg
^
3
ft
Probe Heater Setting )^>/c Nomograph C* i f\M C /V5
Mat'l Processing Rate
Final Gas Meter Reading 3 b"% -7 Q '
Initial Gas Meter Reading 32^. 42. 0
"f77
vja/,
IB/
Condensate Increase in Impingers_
Moisture in Silica Gel
ml
Silica Gel Container No.
Orsat: %C02
fo\) n
%CO
m2
% Excess
Air
Test Conducted By:_
Sample Train Leak Check
Remarks :_^r/6
Filter No.
_gm^
( 44J
&. Mc-RAC
CFM
& L;
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
Distance
From Inside
Stack Wall
(in.)
Clock
Time
/:os'
IH&
f: 3>"
/'St>
.2 .•OS-
Gas Meter
Reading
(ft5)
5_z2> y^D
13,0.2-
33-7^
3^.7
^ PM/?^
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
•u
<2(e
.1.L
,2(0
6A^D <
•z-~
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
("H20)
Calc.
•76
•7£
r/'»
.1 (?
5r A
Actual
,76
.76?
r/ff
,"7(b
C/AJ
Stack Gas
Temu.
/^,3
/&3
li^
1 fc^
*
Gas Sample
Temp . @Dry
Gas Mete"
In
31
$-2
^
*£'$
Out
S/
$'2
^
^5^
Sample
Box
Temp.
CF)
—
—
-
—
Last
Impinger
Temp.
(°F)
__
. — .
—
—
Vacuum
on
Sample
Train
("Hg)
5"
(^
y,
^-
-------
rlW^TB
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING. INC.
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
Plant C'&/-)C7>9£
Time Starts-OS"" ?'*" Time End /§£' 0 5" P »"i
Sample Time /bO min/pt //>OTota1 min
DB °F, WB °F, VP @ DP "Hg
Bar. Press. 3O"Hg, Stack Press. 3& "Hg
Moisture ,%X%, FDA 8^ ',X'Gas Density Factor-
Weather 0Vt.£Cfl.ST ~ UWKJ'Y
Temp. 8S" °F, W/D S , W/S 2Z fi^\
Sample Box No. Meter Box No. (o
Meter AH@ /• "3 Pitot Corr. Factor 6.^3
Nozzle Dia. //
Moisture in Silica Gel
t j>^"-^
gm ^
. Silica Gel Container No. Filter No.
Orsat: %C00
2CO
*"? . .„. . .
% Excess
Air
Test Conducted By: G • Al
B ^^
i .
»
c/?/?t""
Sample Train Leak Check C
) . <9 / CFM
. Remarks: "^ / 5" A'/AJ- AVA?££" A'/tT^"/5.
A?i/A3 (^ 6/?/P/C£T
A//r ,7/
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
Distance
From Inside
Stack Wall
(in.)
Clock
Time
/ ': o£
/'2D
t'Zf
1 '-!> °
2 'O^
Gas Meter
Reading
^iD-^/^f
"217-7
^ 2.^-^
2- "5 Z . .3
2 '-JO, £z*j
if ptj/'tGi
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
,16?
.26*
.2(p
. 2.^
£fJt> C
.<***
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
("H20)
Calc.
•If
• 7/
,1!
•7/
/^ A1
Actual
-fj
,7/
•71
i~7/
,//J
Stack Gas
Temp.
(°F)
/^3
/^
/ 6?^
/ C5 J
>
Gas Sample
Temp. @ Dry
Gas Meter
In
ts*/
S3"
^
S"^
Out
1sl
& "2
153
*V
,
Sample
Box
Temp.
(°F)
—
—
—
••*
Last
Impinger
Temp.
(°F)
— •
-
—
•—
Vacuum
on
Sample
Train
("Hg)
S"
5"
r
^
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
svi
ENGINEERING. INC.
lor
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
Plant £to/4sr>?L Cf/£/f), CPfc?,
Sampling Location TPc/^HSTt./? ^Tp,(Ll<^
Type of Control
Type of Samples -^O^
Date T//3/73 Run No. 9 A
Time Start /^Z^ Time End /£"Zj
Sample Time (p6 min/pt lo & Total min
DB °F, WB °F. VP 6 DP "Hq
Bar. Press. 3<5 "Hq, Stack Press. ^ "Hg
Moisture ,&Z%, FDA •^T'Sas Density Factor-
Weather OOE/^CflST" - lOjMl^
Temp. c(?t-''°F, W/D S , W/S • 5~- 2- CV(]
Sample Box No. Meter Box No. S
Meter AH@ /.^/ Pi tot Corr. Factor £).%3
Nozzle Pis. X-/ in., Probe Length y ft
Probe Heater Setting /5%Nomograph Cf . c^*-/
Stack Dimensions /^^ -ZT-J). in
Stack Area ft2 .
Effective Stack Area ft2
Stack Height l£^ ft
T^%-
Mat'! Processing Rate
Final Gas Meter Reading
Initial Gas Meter Reading
-*~. -:- ft3
3to/.47/' ft3
Condensate Increase 1n Impingers ml
Moisture in Silica Gel
Silica Gel Container No.
Orsat: %C00
^"2 "•-
%CO
%No
% Excess
Air
Test Conducted By: (3-.
gm
Filter No.
n]^fiL
B. t^R KLUTZ*
Sample Train Leak Check
D - &0 CFM
. Remarks: ^y,f sr>//J. ^^f/C&c^ /}F7~£/£
fitl/^ (^ Otf.lPld£
^ H- ~ ,76
.32.
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
Distance
From Inside
Stack Wall
'(in.)
Clock
Time
J.'2iT
JV^O
i > *• f
*-5.>
3-.iv
3:^
Gas Meter
Reading
3^l.4?f
<%9.0
"^7.^
:^S5, ^
373^21
* ?<-(£&£
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
• a<^
.Z6
ttt
,z^
£AJj> t
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
("H20)
Calc.-
."7f.
.7^
.^
.lt>
f &(
Actual
7(^>
.76
'?
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING. INC.
Plant Co/95T/?C CH&1. COR?.
Sampling Location 2>cy?/ASTcr'
Sample Time f-0 min/pt ^^ j0tai min
DB °F, WB °F, W @ DP "Hg
Bar. Press, 3 G> "Hg, Stack Press. 3o "Hg
Moisture i^2-%, FDA • ' /', Gas Density Factor
Weather O\) E-Kcfl c,T " LO //J £>Y
Temp. ?5ii °F, W/D 5 , W/S /5"-.2&Avnl,
Sample Box No. Meter Box No. (p
Meter aH@ /."3> Pitot Corr. Factor C'S"3
Nozzle Dia. V^ in. , Probe Length -7- ft
Probe Heater Setting 'jT/a Nomograph Cf i"?^
Stack Dimensions _/£>J2 Z^>, in
Stack Area ft2 .
Effective Stack Area ft2
Stack Height / 52T"' ft
Sfytot &<
* * *^J
Rittt *t //\
Mat'! Processing Rate
Final Gas Meter Reading
Initial Gas Meter Reading
^7^,2^ ft3
2^-7,737 ft3
Condensate Increase in Impingers ml
Moisture in Silica Gel
Silica Gel Container No.
Orsat: %C00
%00
flMIO
% Excess
Air
gm
Filter No.
Test Conducted By: G. /J/c/f/Jd
S. Lbl?IGHT(£.
Sample Train Leak Check
O.Qf CFM
Remarks:^ /_///; /A). PL(^(^,£ /}fzTt/<>
/?^/AJ (**. OKlP/C.?
' A // - .11
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
(
Distance
From Inside
Stack Wall
(in.)
Clock
Time
HI?
1-JD
2'.5>
l:\b
3:^
Gas Meter
Reading
7^-7^7
2^5. 3
Z£3.5
^7/, 3
XT^.aSg
^ ?(J(£Q>£
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
,2k
.£6
,U
tU
avi> ^
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
("H20)
Calc.
m
-ii
ni
.ii
rxa
Actual
.11
,K
-11
.it
AJ
Stack Gas
Temp.
(°F)
/^3
>
Gas Sample
Temp.PDry
Gas Meter
(°F)
In
97
B8
$1
&
Out
tt
B£
vt>
&
Sample
Box
Temp.
(°F)
—
—
~->
•»~
Last
Impinger
Temp.
(°F)
—
—
-
—
Vacuum
on
Sample
Train
("Hg)
JT
>^
^
^5T
-------
APPENDIX B-2
environmental science and engineering, inc.
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING. INC.
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
Plant
Sampling Location
Type of Control
Type of Samples
_
Date 9~/?// Time End
/
Sample Time
DB — °F. UB —
Bar. Press. J3_O_
Moisture O %, FDA
Weather
3O min/pt 3O Total min
°F, VP @ DP — "Hg
."Hg, Stack Press. 3O "Hg
Gas Density Factor_
Temp. — °F. H/D . W/S —
Sample Box No. — Meter Box No.
Meter &H9 — Pi tot Corr. Factor
Probe Length
Nomograph C
Nozzle Dia. in.
— ft
Probe Heater Setting ~~
Stack Dimensions
Stack Area
Effective Stack Area_
Stack Height
in
Jt
ft
Mat'l Processing Rate
Final Gas Meter Reading "2*9£>.
Initial Gas Meter Reading Z.
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL
NCE AND ENGINEERING. INC.
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
Plant
Sampling Location £/?£
Type of Control
Type of Samples
Date x-y^*-'23 Run No.
- S0*
Time Start
3£>
Time End /£>££>
_min/pt
Sample Time_
DB ~ °F, MB •— °F, VP (? DP
Bar. Press. 3o "Hg, Stack Press.
Moisture
Weather
_Total min
3 "Hg
J'Hg
FDA ~ , Gas Density Factor -*
Temp. - °F. W/D
Sample Box No._
Meter AH@ -
— , W/S
— Meter Box No.
Nozzle Dia. "~~ in.
Probe Heater Setting_
Stack Dimensions
Stack Area
Pi tot Corr. Factor_
Probe Length
ft
Jlomograph Cj •""•
in
ft
Effective Stack Area —
Stack Height - —
ft*
ft
Mat'l Processing Rate_
Final Gas Meter Reading 3O 9 •
ft
Initial Gas Meter Reading Z?7> SOO ft3
Condensate Increase in Impingers ~~ ml
Moisture 1n Silica Gel gm
Silica Gel Container No.
Orsat: %C00
Filter No.
% Excess
Air
Test Conducted By:_
Sample Train Leak Check,
Remarks:
CFM
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
—
—
Distance
From Inside
Stack Wall
(in.)
_
—
Clock
Time
09£o
/9ZO
Gas Meter
Reading
(fO
z?7.£e~D
3 09. /A*
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
>—
—
Meter
Orifice
Press. Dlff.
("H20)
Calc.
—
—
Actual
0,37
0.37
Stack Gas
Temp.
(°F)
—
_»
»
Gas Sample
Temp.@Dry
Gas Meter
(°F)
In
93
93
Out
13
?&
Sample
Box
Temp.
(°F)
—
—
Last
Impinger
Temp.
(°F)
—
—
Vacuum
on
Sample
Train
("Hg)
—
—
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL
VI1
NG, INC.
SOURCE SAMPLING FIELD DATA SHEET
Plant
Sampling Location,
Type of Control
Type of Samples
Date 9-/4'73Run No.
Time Start /O'Z~7 Time End
Sample Time '^ & min/pt 3 O
DB — °F. WB — °F. VP @ DP
Bar. Press. ~3o "Hg, Stack Press.
Moisture Q %, FDA — ,
Weather ~* _
Temp. — °F. W/D ~
JTotal min
\ "Hg
_"Hg
Gas Density Factor ""
w/s —
Sample Box No. — Meter Box No. —
Meter AH@ ~~ Pitot Corr. Factor^ • -
Nozzle Dia. — in., Probe Length_
— ft
Probe Heater Setting —' Nomograph Cf
Stack Dimensions "~" iji
2
Stack Area ~~ ft
Effective Stack Area_
Stack Height
ft
Mat1! Processing Rate
Final Gas Meter Reading 3 / 9. J>9<2- ft3
Initial Gas Meter Reading 3O9. £&& ft3
Condensate Increase in Impingers ~~ _ ml
Moisture 1n Silica Gel — gm
Silica Gel Container No.
Orsat:
Filter No.
% Excess
Air
Test Conducted By;
Sample Train Leak Check_
Remarks:
CFM
Port and
Traverse
Point No.
• —
—
Distance
From Inside
Stack Wall
(in.)
—
—
Clock
Time
/OZ7
/037
Gas Meter
Readjng
309, £oo
3/9. $&•
Stack
Velocity
Head
("H20)
—
—
Meter
Orifice
Press. Diff.
("H20)
Calc.
—
—
Actual
A37
^37
Stack Gas
Temp.
(°F)
—
—
»
Gas Sample
Temp . (?Dry
Gas Meter
(°F)
In
H
9L
Out
?£
H
Sample
Box
Temp.
(°F)
—
—
Last
Impinger
Temp.
(°F)
—
—
Vacuum
on
Sample
Train
("Hg)
— •
—
-------
APPENDIX C-l
environmental science and engineering, inc.
-------
APPENDIX C-l
EPA METHOD NO. 8 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
Prior to performing the actual sulfur dioxide emission tests, certain
preliminary stack parameter data had to be estimated or measured. This
preliminary data included the stack dimensions, temperature, velocity,
pressure, and moisture content.
Sampling methods described in the previously mentioned Federal Register
were used as guidelines for determining the above stack parameter data.
The stack temperature was determined by using bimetallic and mercury bulb
thermometers. The temperature was monitored throughout each test.
Stack gas velocity head measurements were determined for the traverse
point selected by using a calibrated S-type pitot tube with an inclined
manometer. The velocity head was monitored throughout each test.
The stack gas pressure was obtained by inserting a piece of 1/4-inch
stainless steel tubing into the stack and then connecting it to one
leg of the inclined manometer. The stack pressure was essentially
the same as the ambient barometric pressure.
The preliminary estimate of the stack gas moisture content was assumed
to be 1.0 percent by volume. This was based upon prior knowledge of
environmental science and engineering, inc.
-------
the process and the effluent gas moisture content. The final moisture
content used for calculating the gas flow rate for each test was based
upon sulfuric acid mist tests that were performed during the sulfur
dioxide tests. The sampling train used in the acid mist tests included
two impingers with distilled water and one impinger with silica gel for
condensing the stack gas moisture. The EPA-8 sampling train could not
be used for determining the stack gas moisture content because a certain
amount of the isopropanol in the first impinger evaporated during each
test, therefore eliminating an accurate measurement of the condensate.
>
Figure 5 is a schematic diagram of the sulfur dioxide sampling train
(EPA-8) used for each test. Two EPA-8 trains were run simultaneously
during each test. Three one-hour tests were performed each day for
three days.
Immediately after each test was over, the sampling probes were dis-
connected from each train. The ice bath was drained, and the remaining
part of the train was purged with ambient air for 15 minutes. The purg-
ing rate for each train was the same as the isokinetic sampling rate
used during the test.
The sample was recovered and analyzed in the following manner:
1. The front half of each train (nozzle through the filter)
was rinsed with 80 percent isopropanol and placed into a
glass container. Also included was the used 80 percent
environmental science and engineering, inc.
-------
Isopropanol from the first impinger. The sample was given
to plant personnel for their own use since the objective of
this study did not include an evaluation of sulfur trioxide
and sulfuric acid mist concentrations.
2. The back half (filter holder back half through the third
impinger) was rinsed with deionized, distilled water and
placed into a glass container. Also included was the used
3 percent hydrogen peroxide solution from the second and
third impingers. The samples were transferred to the plant
where ESE personnel performed the analyses using the barium-
thorin titration method.
environmental science and engineering, inc.
-------
APPENDIX C-2
DUPONT ANALYZER SAMPLING PROCEDURES
The sampling procedures for continuously measuring and recording sulfur
dioxide data have already been described in Section 2.0.
Generally, the DuPont Model 460 sulfur dioxide analyzer was used along
with an L&N strip recorder and a Westinghouse Adviser magnetic tape
recorder.
The DuPont analyzer is calibrated daily with a zero and span gas. The
magnetic tapes are changed monthly and then sent to Westinghouse for .
data reduction by a computer.
environmental science and engineering, inc.
-------
APPENDIX D-l
environmental science and engineering, inc.
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, INC.
LAB DATA SHEET
. SULFUR DIOXIDE ANALYSIS
Plant Name ^\^ks\^v C'W-vC.oJL Date Analyzed IdM^f br~,-f H7.
i i
Analyzed By Sf\\VW_
Stack
ffito+fajn
Ab. 2.
^j_
^V.
Hours
Sample No.
l
i\
it
it
n
N.
0. Q 1 l(e>
"
.'
n
n
>\
1 1
>\
"
M
M
V.Soln.
M-\l
M
3 la.
a
3^G
...
37/
i. •
V.A.
-'-
1
-
1
"
1
••
1
..
V.T. = Volume of Barium perchlorate titrant used for sample (ml)
V.T.B. = Volume of Barium perchlorate titrant used for blank (ml)
N. = Normality of Barium perchlorate
V.Soln. = Total solution -volume
V.A. = Volume of sample aliquot titrated (ml)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, INC.
LAB DATA SHEET
. SULFUR DIOXIDE ANALYSIS
Plant Name M 0 ,
Analyzed By
Date Analyzed
Hours
Stack
Sample No.
^vxv.Sfl .-(
\\
^^ TB
i,
^^ '4- A- \N^
^ *>
Tiu^ HB'
IV
'"D cTA
r\ UL^ j> /i
i.i
V.T.
n.ft*
7. to
S.7^
*,7^
4.V3
4-, 09
9 31
9.^1
^, ^
fci^
.
V.T.B.
o, oa
,. •
-
"
.t
,«
u
k>
I,
,1
N.
O.OHla
"
-
„
,i
,,
,,
..
i.
n
V.Soln.
U-»J.<3
II
4^i
6'^-0
1 1
4lg
1 1
NJ VO ^—
1 1
V.A.
£
it
d
«
1
i.
a
..
1
„
V.T. = Volura of Barium perchlorate titrant used for sample (ml)
V.T.B. = Voluire of Barium perchlorate titrant used for blank (ml)
N. = Normality of Barium perchlorate
V.Soln. = Total solution volura
V.A. = Volura of sample aliquot titrated (ml)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, INC.
LAB DAT A "SHEET
. SULFUR DIOXIDE ANALYSIS
Plant Name W LC
Date Analyzed
Analyzed By SVY* \-VV- Hours
Stack
Sample No.
^u_v. €TB
"Cu, u $
VI
1v_ i n
"R^ n B
,
V.T.
5-.UU
^r.kU
U.ot
(L,03
4,41
4.40
£.DSL
d.o>s-
-7-1 1
7,13
%
V.T.B.
C. Oi
I ' •
tl
IV
u.
1 1
u
..
•i
n
N.
(0. 6li lo
,•
u
M
II
II
r\
\\
it
il
V.Soln.
^/oS
\\
"^ 4- *"/
M-IU
u
3^9
• i
35-6
,.
V.A.
1
n
1
n
I
u
1
"
/
-
V.T. = Volume of Barium perchlorete titrant used for sample (ml)
V.T.B. = Volume of Barium pcrchlorate titrant used for blank (ml)
N. = Normality of Barium perchlorate
V.Soln. = Total solution volume
V.A. = Volumo of sample aliquot titrated (ml)
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, INC.
LAB DATA SHEET
. SULFUR DIOXIDE ANALYSIS
Plant Name
Analyzed By
omi
Date Analyzed
Hours
Stack
Sample No.
V.T.
V.T.B
N.
V.Soln.
V.A.
(.
1 V
7.^-2.
1 1
u
II
V.T. = Volura of Barium perchlorate titrant used for sample (ml)
V.T.B. = Volume of Barium pcrchlo.rate titrant used for blank (ml)
N. = Norr.ality of Barium perchlorate
V.Soln. = Total solution volura
V.A. = Volura of sample aliquot titrated (ml)
-------
APPENDIX D-2
environmental science and engineering, inc.
-------
^ . ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, INC.
' LAB DATA SHEET
. SULFUR DIOXIDE ANALYSIS
Plant Name Cofl-ST"AL Ctf 5M. Cogft Date Analyzed /*f Sip-f 1
Analyzed By -STvYArW^ Hours
Stack
C/u-ie&trst*
«
it
Sample No.
;
*"** O OO~fJ>Ty«fYv
/v— ,V^"O •^>t>Y^
V \
V.T.
SL.70
9.52
/.a 7
—
V.T.B.
o.o^
"
N.
(Wfr
.'
.'
V.Soln.
^3r
590
3^<2.
,t
V.A.
/>«4
^>nl
^ni.
•
V.T. = Volume of Barium perch! orate titrant used for sample (ml)
V.T.B. = Volume of Barium perchlorate titrant used for blank (ml)
N. = Normality of Barium perchlorate
V.Soln. = Total solution volume
V.A. = Volume of sample aliquot titrated (ml)
-------
APPENDIX E
environmental science and engineering, inc.
-------
(John Dollar)
SOURCE SAMPLING LOG
COASTAL CHEMICAL CORP.
PASCAGOULA, MISSISSIPPI
9/10/73 Arrived at plant about 0815. Sholtes, McRae, Wrighter
and I met with Bob Harrington. We proceeded to set up
sampling equipment and calibrate continuous monitor.
We went to lunch at noon and then returned to plant.
Sholtes and I met with Jim Smith and obtained permission
to get strip charts ($02) from C.C.C. when complete.
We plan to make copies of the charts and then return
originals back to C.C.C.
9/11/73
Sholtes left Pascagoula in his plane about 1500. We
phoned Ed McCarley (EPA) at the La Font Motel before
Sholtes left.
I met McCarley at the plant about 1545. We finished
setting equipment up and left plant about 1645.
We arrived at plant about 0815. I began calibrating the
S02 monitor with the three concentrations of S02 calibration
gas. The sequence was the following: 0919, High; 0941, Low;
1002, Med.; 1027, High; 1058, Med.; 1122, Back Purge;
1133, On Line. The two EPA Method 8, S02 sampling trains
environmental science and engineering, inc.
-------
began their test runs 1-A and 1-B at 1145 and ended at
1245. Both trains were purged for 15 minutes the same
sampling rate used during the test runs. The "front
half" of the train was saved and given to C.C.C. for their
information. EPA okayed this.
McRae and Wrighter went to get some sandwiches about 1330.
Gene Smith (EPA) arrived at plant about 1400. He and
McCarley toured the plant.
i
We readjusted the "Fine Zero" on the S02 monitor after
the first EPA-8 tests.
The second S02 tests began at 1522 and ended at 1622.
The third test began at 1735 and ended at 1835.
9/12/73 We arrived at the plant at 0805 and proceeded to set up
the S02 and H2S04 mist trains. We had difficulty with
the umbilical cord electrical extension cords. One had
a short in it. We began the 4th S02 run at 1055 and
ended at 1155. The first Monsanto and Modified Monsanto
H2$0^ mist test runs began at 1235 and ended at 1605.
We had great difficulty in maneuvering the probes because
environmental science and engineering, inc.
-------
of the small scaffolding area. The guard rails were
also hindering the movement of probes in and out of the
stack. Two 8-ft probes were broken (one before starting
Run #1 and one before staring Run #2).
The remaining SC^ (EPA-8) tests were performed as
follows:
Test No. Times
5 1525 - 1625
6 1745 - 1845
>
The second acid mist tests began at 1810 and ended at
2130.
9/13/73 The wind and rain was so bad that it was impossible to
perform the acid mist tests, therefore they were postponed
one day.
Since the S0? (EPA-8) sampling trains did not need much
attention after each sampling period began, we decided
to go ahead and perform the three tests. The S02 tests
were performed as follows:
Test No. Times
7 1140 - 1240
8 1305 - 1405
9 1425 - 1525
environmental science and engineering, inc.
-------
9/14/73 The remaining acid mist tests were performed from
0820 to 1050. There were no major problems during the
test run.
The 250 PPM S02 gas cylinder was hoisted up to the top
level for the purpose of checking the following:
1) Response time
2) Check to see if there was a difference
in the SOo concentration whether the
calibration gas was injected at the probe
or just before the DuPont analyzer. No.
difference could be detected.
The three calibration gas cylinders were also calibrated by
the EPA-8 Method (including the first impinger with the
80% isopropanol).
All of the sampling equipment was removed from the test
site and driven back to Gainesville by McRae and Wrighter.
All of the S02 and acid mist samples collected for the
day were analyzed.
The remaining people flew hack to Gainesville.
environmental science and engineering, inc.
-------
APPENDIX F
PROJECT PARTICIPANTS
Environmental Science and Engineering, Inc.
Robert S. Sholtes, Ph.D., P.E. Senior Advisor
John R. Dollar, M.S.E., E.I.T. Project Manager
Mary L. Smith, B.S.Ch. Chemist
Eric Johnson Senior Technician
Gary McRae Technician
Bill Wrighter Technician
Larry Wurts Technician
Ken McFall Technician
Rick Parrel! Technician
Environmental Protection Agency
J. E. McCarley Project Test Officer
Gene Smith Project Engineer
environmental science and engineering, inc.
------- |