EPA PROJECT REPORT NUMBER 74-CKQ-l
   CD
O
                                       U. S. STEEL CLAIRTON  COKE WORKS

                                           Clairton., Pennsy 1 vania
                 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                            Office of Air and Waste Management
                        Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
                              Emission Measurement Branch
                   /       Research Triangle Park. North Carolina

-------
U.  S.  STEEL CLAIRTON COKE WORKS



    CLAIRTON, PENNSYLVANIA





           74-CKO-1

-------
                         TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section                                               Page
I    Introduction    .             .                     1

II   Results     "                                      1

III  Process Description and Operation                 2

IV   Procedure                                         2

V    Appendices                                       H

         1.  Field Data:  Charging Emissions
         2.  Field Data:  Topside Inspection
         3.  Process Description:
               Stage Charging-Clairton Works
         4.  Test Procedure
         5.  Participants

-------
I.   Introduction
         During the period of May 6-9,  1974,  emission  tests  were  con-
    ducted at the U. S. Steel Clairton  Coke Works,  Clairton, Pennsylvania.
    Under the direction of Reid Iversen of the U.  S.  Environmental  Pro-
    tection Agency (EPA),  three inspectors similtaneously observed  the
    coke oven charging operations.   The purpose of the tests was  to deter-
    mine the total time during which visible  emissions were  emitted from
    the charging ports and/or hoppers during  the actual  oven charging opera-
    tion; the emissions were not quantified in terms  of percent opacity.
    In addition to observing the charging emissions,  the observers  performed
    numerous "Topside Inspections"  which involved  walking the length of the
    coke battery and noting which ovens had visible emissions leaking from
    oven lids and/or standpipes.  The oven numbers  and points of  emissions
    were recorded.
         Various plant personnel and other observers  were present during
    the test period; a complete list of those persons  is presented  in
    Appendix V.
II.  Results
         The inspectors observed the charging on batteries 1-3 upon the
    recommendation of U.  S. Steel  personnel;  they  indicated  that  these
    batteries would have  the least  emissions  during charging. Table 1 is
    a test log indicating  on which  oven batteries  the  inspectors  were ob-
    serving, as well as the number  of charges observed each  day.
         Table 2 is a tabulation of the total  time  each inspector observed

-------
    visible emissions  for each charge.   The  field  data  sheets  are  found
    in Appendix I.   Appendix II contains the data  sheets  for the topside
    inspections.
III.Process Description and  Operation
         Table 3  lists the design  parameters of  Coke  Batteries  1-3.
    Appendix III  contains an article, prepared by  U.  S. Steel  personnel,
    which explains  the stage charging process at the  Clairton  Works.
         During the testing, coke  batteries  1, 2,  and 3 were operating in
    a normal  manner.   Table  4 lists  the  operating  conditions during  the
    test period.  Table 5 lists the  coal  mixes and analyses for the  testing
    period.
 IV.Procedure
         The observers situated themselves on top  of  the  coke  battery such
    that they had a clear view of  all four charging hoppers and ports of
    the oven being  charged.   One stopwatch was used to  time the period of
    visible emissions; a second stopwatch was used to time the  charge period.
    On the first  day of observations, the inspectors  simply recorded the
    total  time of visible emissions  for  each charge.  On  the' second, third,
    and fourth days of observations, in  addition to recording  the  total time
    of visible emissions, the observers  indicated  what  portion  of  these
    emissions were  observed  prior  to leveling of the  charge.   The  moment the
    leveling began  was determined  by listening for a  buzzer blown  by the
    larry car operator or by watching the leveling bar.
         The test method used is presented in Appendix  IV.

-------
                                  TABLE 1

                                 Test Log
 Date

5/6/74

5/7/74



5/8/74



5/9/74
   Time

1230-1600

 850-1120

1250-1530

 850-1125

1245-1550

 840-1115

1300-1505
Battery Number

    1,2,3

      2,3

      1,2

      2,3

      2,3

      1,2

      3,2
Number of
 Charges
Observed

   21

   14

   17

   14

   18

   14

   16

-------
                                  TABLE 2

                       Summary of Visible Emissions
Date
Oven/Battery
Total  Period of Visible Emissions
           (Seconds)

5/6/74 A30/1
B30/1
A3 0/2
B30/2
A30/3
B30/3
Cl/2
AT/3
Bl/3
Cl/3
B3/2
A3/3
B3/3
B5/2
A5/3
B5/3
B7/2
A7/3
B7/3
B9/2
°A9/3
5/7/74 . B9/2
A9/3
B9/3
BIT/2
All/3
Iversen
n
22
4.5
3
8
15
16
5
11
5
14
13
3
20
3
8
8
17
12
4
13
26
25
3
20
11
Neulicht
31
25
2
4
14.5
15.5
18.5
23.5
48
16.5
35
22
16
27
19
14
11
28.5
21
16
27
32
14
2.5
25
15.5
Smith
13.5
18
10.5
11.5
11
6
16
4
10
5
8
3
14
10
6
3.5
8.5
20
11
11
16
17.5
67
7
9.5
6

-------
-Date
                                   TABLE 2
                                 (Continued)
                       -Summary of Visible Emissions
•Oven/Battery
-Total Period of Visible  Emissions
           (Seconds)

5/7/74 Bll/3
B13/2
A13/3
B13/3
B15/2
A15/3
B15/3
B17/2
Al 7/3
A21/1
B21/1
A21/2
A23/1
B23/1
A23/2
A25/1
B25/1
A25/2
A27/1
B27/1
A27/2
A29/1
B29/1
A29/2
A31/1
. B31/1
5/8/74 A31/3
B31/3
Iversen
- 16.5
17
13.5
8
10.5
16
19.5
10.5
14
14
42
15
18
105
12
15
12
14
18
27
14
15.5
14
18
13
10
2
19
Neulicht
14
23
18 .
3
-
19
20
19
15
-
49
15
24
108
16
17
9
13
22
33
14
17
16
24
13
13
4
-
Smith
6
8
8
5
11
7
9
5
6
-
-
12
30
8.5
7
10
7
6.5
12
10
12
24
20
34
21
19
4
16

-------
Date
                                  TABLE 2
                                (Continued)
                       Summary of Visible Emissions
Oven/Battery
Total Period of Visible Emissions
           (Seconds)

5/8/74. B2/2
C2/2
A2/3
B2/3
C2/3
B4/2
A4/3
B4/3
B6/2
A6/3
B6/3
B8/2
BIO/3
B12/2
A12/3
B12/3
B14/2
A14/3
B14/3
B16/2
A16/3
B16/3
B18/2
AT 8/3
Bl 8/3
B20/2
A20/3
B20/3
Iversen
74
76
23
17
79
15
19
16
16
36
18
15
-
-
18
20
12
15
14
16
20
11
12
13
14
-
-
-
Neulicht
-
-
-
15
82
16
27
15
13
27
20
8
5
9
17
-
7
24
14
15
10
8
13
15
21
-
17
14
Smith
17
64
21
16
60
-
22
18
6
25
13
- '•
-
9.5
5
11
5
10
9.5
.
12
7.5
37
-
-
28
14
16

-------
                                  TABLE 2
                                (Continued)
                       Summary of Visible Emissions
Date
Oven/Battery
Total Period of Visible Emissions
           (Seconds)

5/8/74 B22/2
A22/3
5/9/74 A22/1 .
B22/1
A22/2
B24/1
A24/2
A26/1
B26/1
A26/2
A28/1
B28/1
A28/2
A30/1
B30/1
A30/2
Al/1
Bl/1
Cl/1
Al/2
Bl/2
A3/1
B9/1
A9/2
B9/2
All/1
Bll/1
All/2
A13/1
B13/1
A13/2
B13/2
Iversen
-
-
13
12.5
23
28.5
14
5
9
13
6.5
12.5
12
20
7
14
20
12
9.5
12
17
21
74.5
-
12
10
85
13
13
2
-
20
Neulicht
18
13
10 '
15
32
29
4
4
8
11
13
11
12
15
1
22
-
-
' -
-

-
-
18
-
7
95
-
12
6
• 27.
. • '-
Smi th
16.5
19
16
13
12
25
9
5
9
20
6
11
15
18
12
10.5
.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
'
-
-

-------
                                 TABLE 3
                          COKE: OVEN1 DESCRIPTION.
PLANT
TYPE OF OVEN
NUMJLR in' ii.-I
BATTERY NO. 0
NUM^-R OF OVE.
DATE OF TNITI.
DATE OF LAST
DATE OF LAST 1
HOT DIMENSIONS
•
&,
c
H
U
3
cs.
OVEN
WIDTH
OVEN
LENGTH
OVEN
HEIGHT
CAI.CULAT
•
SUPPiJER
HEATING SYSTEM DESIGN
FUEL 'GAS US.: D
1'ERl Eo OF EACH TYPE
I OTH!--; DESIGNATION
:S .EACH BATTERY
\L OPERATION
FLOOR UP RE CHILD
\\D UP REiJUELD
COKE SIDE
PUSHER SIDE
AVERAGE
TAPER
BETWEEN DOORS
FACE TO FACE BRICKWORK
FLOOR TO ROOF
FLOOR TO COAL LINE
FREE SPACE ABOVE COAL
FLOOR-TOP OF HORIZONTAL FLUE
ZD CAPACITY CU. FT. OF COAL
TOP OF OVEH TO BATTERY TOP
PAD TO OVEN FLOOR
CENTER TO CENTER HEATING WALL
A"C . 1 "'"' '
LINER BR
Claircon
Wilnutte
Sir/'lo -Divided
Coke Oven Gir.
3
1,2,3
64
1918(1-2-3)
-
1955(1-2-3)
20-1/4"
17-1/8"
18-11/16"
3"
37' - 4-1/2"
. 40' - 0-1/2"
11' - 10-1/4".
10' - 0-3/8"
13"
9' - 11-1/8"
626.29
V - 7-3/4"
10' - 7-1/4" •
3' - 9-1/V
_, . . , ^ r^ ... , T . .. _ , _ v . -,.^ T. p . -ii _ 1 1 ,n
..'.. ^ '-."•- ^ « :. •'.--\iJL> ^ 1.1 .-, x. ^Jiv... w .^ | J J i'
ICK DENSITY
OVEH FLOOR
OVEN JAM
REG EN ERA
(..''. ;-..\ DOi;
• r " IT;? r : ' <
j i- -\ U- ^ I., w
AUX. END FLUE
NUMBER OF GAS
NUMBER OF AIR
CiLARGING
HOLES
NUMBER OF COL
INSIDE D I AM El
NUM3ER OF HAT
TYPE OF OVE;;
NUMBER OF OVE
ui
X
o
K-J
E-
O
TYPE OF
DOOR CLE
J,V-:H CLE
LEVF.i F'R
33
TOR WALLS
K LiNINGS
LO Ii'i 1;!:.AIINC. WALL
HEATING SYSTEM
•'ORTS EACH FLUE
PORTS EACH FLUE
NUMBERS PER OVEN
DIAMETER
LECT1NG J-LMNS - POSITION
ER OF STAN!) PIPE
i'KRY CROSSOVER MAINS
POORS
::S PER OFERAT1NG UNIT
REVERSE MACHINE
ANERS
A::ERS
DOOR ACTIVATORS
LID !. I .--:••:•!: 5
ELK3W CLEAN'-X.S
CHARGING
PUSHING
"iV-'E OF
CAR EMISSION'S COinROL
EMISSIONS CONTROL
LA:1./, L C. '•..'. r E r.'''
Hi:;i! L;;J i;,ir.iLi.i.::f; ^::>\. ' .
112/-7cu.£t.
Clay
Silica
Si lica
Brick
28
.
1
1
4
• 14"
2
13"
2
. Scli-So-nling
192
Mechanical
-
-
-
'
-
Stage Charging
Good Operating Practice
'Cir.vicy j
A i c -^vs t'.-.r
1
  Information from letter of 9/6/74 fi"om John G. Munson,  Assistant to Vice
  President of U. S. Steel, to Reid Iversen, EPA.

                                -' :'   8                  '      :-

-------
                                    TABLE 4 '
                             PROCESS INFORMATION

                  Typical Readings for Underfiring Controls




Batteries
Dates
Gas Volume
Gas Pressure
Waste Heat
Stack Draft

cu.ft./hr.
mm- H?0
PS °Fahr.
PS mm FLO
May
1-2-3
6-9, 1974

286,000-335,000


139-174
320-370
17-18


Typical Flue Temperatures
Date
5-6
5-7
5-8
5-9
Avg.
#1
P.S. C.S.
2629 2699
2616 2699
2610 2698
2610 2689
2616 2696
Batteries
•#2
P.S.
2612
2607
2618
2606
2611
1-2-3

C.S.
2691
2683
2700
2683
2689

P.S.
2595
2605
2595
2601
2599
#3 '
C.S.
2689
2702
2690
2700
2695
                             Typical  Oven Pressure
           Average                + 4 mm FLO
                                  Production

                   Date                               Ovens charged/day
               Scheduled production                         270
                  5/6/74                                    255
                  5/7/74                                    258
                  5/8/74                                    259
                  5/9/74                                    270
Information from letter of 9/6/74 from John G. Munson, Assistant to Vice
President of U. S.  Steel, to Reid Iversen, EPA.


                                       •9

-------
                                         TABLE 5"1
                                 COAL MIXES AND ANALYSES
                            Batteries 1-2-3
                                      May 6-9, 1974
                                       COAL MIXES
5-6
5-7
5-8
5-9
31% Robena
31% Robena
31% Robena
31% Robena
       24% Maple Creek
       24% Maple Creek
       24% Maple Creek
       24% Maple Creek
                              25% Low Vol
                              25%,.Low Vol
                              25% Low Vol
                              25% Low Vol
                                      20% Special
                                      20% Special
                                      20% Special
                                      20% Special
Date
5-6
5-7
5-8
5-9

Avg.
H2°

7.6
6.6
7.1
7.4

7.17
 Ash
  00
  90
7.
6.
6.75
7.10
6.94
               Blend Analyses
                        Bulk
            Sul.         Dens.
1.32
1.29
1.26
1.27

1.28
52.6
52.7
52.6
52.6

52.6

+.500"
4.6
4.6
2.2
3.0
Screen Size
+.250"
16.0
14.7
15.1
15.3

(- ) .125"
61.7
62.4
65.8
64.2
                                    3.6
15.3
63.5
   Information from letter of 9/6/74 from John G. Mimson, Assistant to Vice
   President of U. S. Steel, to Reid Iversen, EPA.
                                             10

-------