REPORT NO,: 77-CUS-6
AIR POLLUTION
EMISSION TEST
O
ASARCO
EL PASO/ TEXAS
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Office of Air and Waste Management
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Emission Measurement Branch
Research Triangle Park. North Carolina
-------
PARTICULATE AND ARSENIC EMISSION MEASUREMENTS
FROM A COPPER SMELTER
EMB Project Report No.: 77-CUS-6
Plant Tested
ASARCO
El Paso, Texas
June 20-30, 1977
Prepared for
Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Emission Measurement Branch
Research Triangle Park, N.C. 27711
By
D. L. Harris
MONSANTO RESEARCH CORPORATION
Dayton Laboratory
1515 Nicholas Rd.
Dayton, Ohio 45407
Report reviewed by: Frank Clay
Contract No.: 68-02-1404, Task No. 35
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section Page
1 Introduction 1
2 Summary of Results 5
3 Description of the Process 57
4 Location of Sampling Points 59
5 Sampling and Analytical Procedures 69
111
-------
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
2-1 Summary of Arsenic Results at the Inlet of the 6
Stack (Point A) - Metric Units
2-2 Summary of Arsenic Results at the Inlet of the 7
Stack (Point A) - English Units
2-3 Summary of Arsenic Results at South Outlet of 8
the Reverberatory Furnaces (Point SB)
Metric Units
2-4 Summary of Arsenic Results at South Outlet of 9
the Reverberatory Furnaces (Point SB)
English Units
2-5 Summary of Arsenic Results at North Outlet of 10
the Reverberatory Furnaces (Point NB)
Metric Units
2-6 Summary of Arsenic Results at North Outlet of H
the Reverberatory Furnaces (Point NB)
English Units
2-7 Summary of Arsenic Results at the Outlet of the 12
Roasters (Point C) - Metric Units
2-8 Summary of Arsenic Results at the Outlet of the 13
Roasters (Point C) - English Units
2-9 Summary of Arsenic Results at the Inlet of the 14
H2S04 Plant (Point D) - Metric Units
2-10 Summary of Arsenic Results at the Inlet of the 15
H2SOit Plant (Point D) - English Units
2-11 Summary of Arsenic Results at Outlet of the 16
Plant (Point E) - Metric Units
2-12 Summary of Arsenic Results at Outlet of the 17
H2S04 Plant (Point E) - English Units
2-13 Summary of Particulate Results at the Inlet of 18
the Stack (Point A) - Metric Units
2-14 Summary of Particulate Results at Inlet of the 19
Stack (Point A) - English Units
IV
-------
LIST OF TABLES - Continued
Table Paqe
2-15 Summary of Particulate Results at South Outlet 20
of the Reverberatory Furnaces (Point SB)
Metric Units
2-16 Summary of Particulate Results at South Outlet 21
of the Reverberatory Furnaces (Point SB)
English Units
2-17 Summary of Particulate Results at North Outlet 22
of the Reverberatory Furnace (Point NB)
Metric Units
2-18 Summary of Particulate Results at North Outlet 23
of the Reverberatory Furnace (Point NB)
English Units
2-19 Summary of Particulate Results at the Outlet of 24
the Roasters (Point C) - Metric Units
2-20 Summary of Particulate Results at the Outlet of 25
the Roasters (Point C) - English Units
2-21 Cascade Impactor Particle Size Distribution for 26
Run C-l (Metric Units)
2-22 Cascade Impactor Particle Size Distribution for 27
Run C-l (English Units)
2-23 Cascade Impactor Particle Size Distribution for 28
Run SB-2 (Metric Units)
2-24 Cascade Impactor Particle Size Distribution for 29
Run SB-2 (English Units)
2-25 Cascade Impactor Particle Size Distribution for 30
Run SB-3 (Metric Units)
2-26 Cascade Impactor Particle Size Distribution for 31
Run SB-3 (English Units)
2-27 Cascade Impactor Particle Size Distribution for 32
Run NB-4 (Metric Units)
2-28 Cascade Impactor Particle Size Distribution for 33
Run NB-4 (English Units)
-------
LIST OF TABLES - Continued
Paqe
Cascade Impactor Particle Size Distribution for 34
Run C-5 (Metric Units)
2-30 Cascade Impactor Particle Size Distribution for 35
Run C-5 (English Units)
2-31 Cascade Impactor Particle Size Distribution for 36
Run C-6 (Metric Units)
2-32 Cascade Impactor Particle Size Distribution for 37
Run C-6 (English Units)
2-33 Cascade Impactor Particle Size Distribution for 38
Run C-7 (Metric Units)
2-34 Cascade Impactor Particle Size Distribution for 39
Run C-7 (English Units)
2-35 Cascade Impactor Particle Size Distribution for 40
Run NB-8 (Metric Units)
2-36 Cascade Impactor Particle Size Distribution for 41
Run NB-8 (English Units)
2-37 Cascade Impactor Particle Size Distribution for 42
Run SB-9 (Metric Units)
2-38 Cascade Impactor Particle Size Distribution for 43
Run SB-9 (English Units)
2-39 Cascade Impactor Particle Size Distribution for 44
Run SB-10 (Metric Units)
2-40 Cascade Impactor Particle Size Distribution for 45
Run SB-10 (English Units)
2-41 Cascade Impactor Particle Size Distribution for 46
Run SB-11 (Metric Units)
2-42 Cascade Impactor Particle Size Distribution for 47
Run SB-11 (English Units)
2-43 Cascade Impactor Particle Size Distribution for 48
Run NB-12 (Metric Units)
2-44 Cascade Impactor Particle Size Distribution for 49
Run NB-12 (English Units)
vi
-------
LIST OF TABLES - Continued
Table Page
2-45 Cascade Impactor Particle Size Distribution for 50
Run NB-13 (Metric Units)
2-46 Cascade Impactor Particle Size Distribution for 51
Run NB-13 (English Units)
2-47 Cascade Impactor Particle Size Distribution for 52
Run C-14 (Metric Units)
2-48 Cascade Impactor Particle Size Distribution for 53
Run C-14 (English Units)
2-49 Cascade Impactor Particle Size Distribution for 54
Run C-15 (Metric Units)
2-50 Cascade Impactor Particle Size Distribution for 55
Run C-15 (English Units)
2-51 Arsenic Analysis Results for Process Samples 56
vn
-------
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure Page
4-1 Sampling location D 61
4-2 Sampling location C 63
4-3 Sampling location B 65
4-4 Sampling point A 67
Vlll
-------
SECTION 1
INTRODUCTION
Under the Clean Air Act of 1970, the Environmental Protection
Agency is given the responsibility of establishing performance
standards for new installations or modifications to existing in-
stallations in the stationary source categories. As a contrac-
tor, Monsanto Research Corporation (MRC), under the Environmental
Protection Agency's (EPA) "Field Sampling of Atmospheric Emis-
sions" program, was asked to provide emission data from the
ASARCO copper smelter at El Paso, Texas.
The field test work was directed by Frank Clay, Field Testing
Section, Emission Measurement Branch, EPA. The sampling was
performed by Monsanto Research Corporation with Darrell L. Harris
as team leader.
This report tabulates the data that were collected from the ef-
fluent of the convertor line, the reverberatory furnace, and the
multi-hearth roasters of the ASARCO smelter.
This program was separated into essentially two phases. The
first phase was sampling of the effluent of the convertor line.
These gases are collected into two ducts and directed to an in-
duced draft fan. The exhaust of this fan is directed through a
short section of duct work into a long spray chamber. This
short section of duct work is sampling location D, inlet to the
sulfuric acid plant. The gases leave the spray chamber and go
to an electrostatic precipitation particulate collection device.
-------
From here they are directed to the inlet of the sulfuric acid
plant. The outlet of the sulfuric acid plant is an atmospheri-
cally vented stack. This outlet duct is sampling location E.
The second phase of this program was to sample the outlets of
the reverberatory furnace, the outlets of the multi-hearth roast-
ers, and the combination of these gases after passing through the
particulate removal system at the base of the main stack. The
gases from the multi-hearth roasters are directed to a large
downtake at the side of the roaster building and down into a
large existing brick flue. This downtake is sampling location C.
The gases from the reverberatory furnace pass through two waste
heat boilers and then through two rectangular ducts into the same
existing flue. These two flues are designated sampling locations
North B and South B. The gases in this flue pass to a spray
chamber, leave the spray chamber and pass through an electrostat-
ic precipitator. The gases leaving this electrostatic precipi-
•tator pass through a large balloon flue and into the base of the
main stack. This balloon flue is sampling location A.
Sites A, B, and C were measured for particulate concentrations
according to the procedures described in the Federal Register,
Method 5, "Determination of Particulate Emissions from Stationary
Sources". Other procedures that were carried out were: Method 1,
"Sample and Velocity Traverses for Stationary Sources", Method 2,
"Determination of Stack Gas Velocity and Volumetric Flow Rate
(Type S pitot tube)", and Method 3, "Gas Analysis for Carbon Di-
oxide, Excess Air, and Dry Molecular Weight". All locations were
also measured for arsenic concentrations. The arsenic concentra-
tion procedure utilized a modified Method 5 particulate train
designed with additional impingers and various impinger solutions
to remove arsenic from the gas stream. Particle size determina-
tions were made at the outlets of the multi-hearth roasters, and
-------
the North and South reverberatory furnace outlets, using a Brink®
cascade impactor.
Elaborate modifications were required at several of the sampling
locations to prepare the ducts for sampling. At sampling loca-
tions North B and South B, test ports were installed. Since this
location had an extremely high ambient temperature in the work
area (165°F), four 8-foot by 4-foot insulated heat shields were
constructed to protect the operators. Also, two industrial
4-foot diameter air blowers were rented and installed below the
floor grating to move cooler ambient air into the area. At sam-
pling location C test ports were required to be installed on two
sides of the rectangular downtake. Four test ports were in-
stalled on each of two sides of the downtake, the building side
and the opposite, or exterior, side. The building side required
no scaffolding, however, the exterior side required that a cat-
walk scaffolding be erected for a work platform just below the
sampling ports. At sampling location D, the converter effluent
line, it was required that two ports be installed on the circular
duct and scaffolding erected. The only modifications required at
sampling locations A and E were the construction of some small
platforms and support devices for the sampling equipment.
The following sections of this report include: (1) Summary of
Results, (2) Description of the Process, (3) Location of Sampling
Points and Traverse Data, (4) Sampling and Analytical Procedures.
Appendices include all field data, analytical data, and calcula-
tions from this sampling project.
-------
SECTION 2
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
The first three runs at locations designated A, NB, SB, and C
were performed for collection of arsenic and the last two runs
were for determining particulate loading. All three runs at
location D and all four runs at location E were for arsenic de-
termination. Brink® particle size determination runs were per-
formed at 'locations NB, SB, and C.
Tables 2-1 through 2-12 show summaries of arsenic determinations
at all locations, Tables 2-13 through 2-20 show summaries of
particulate determinations at locations A, SB, NB, and C, and
Tables 2-21 through 2-50 show complete Brink® results taken at
locations SB, NB, and C. Table 2-51 summarizes arsenic analyses
on process samples.
-------
Table 2-1.
SUMMARY OF ARSENIC RESULTS AT THE INLET OF THE STACK (POINT A)
Metric Units
Run Number
Date
Method Type
Volume of gas sampled-Nm3
Percent moisture by volume
Average stack temperature-°C
Stack volumetric flow rate-Nm3/min
Stack volumetric flow rate-Am3/min
Percent Isokinetic
Duration of run - minutes
Arsenic - probe, cyclone and filter catch
mg
g/Nm3
Kg/hr
Arsenic - total catch
mg
g/Nm3
Kg/hr
Percent impinger catch
A-l
6/26/77
Arsenic
1.35
6.81
102
5693
8988
100.4
153
2.88
0.002
0.727
6.11
0.005
1.543
A-2
6/27/77
Arsenic
1.41
6.13
104
5944
9398
100.4
153
9.89
0.007
2.496
13.30
0.009
3.357
A-3
6/28/77
Arsenic
1.42
1.39
105
6307
9478
95.4
153
4.72
0.003
1.252
5.80
0.004
1.539
53
26
19
Normal cubic meters at 20°C, 760 mm Hg
Actual cubic meters per minute
-------
Table 2-2.
SUMMARY OF ARSENIC RESULTS AT THE INLET OF THE STACK (POINT A)
English Units
Run Number
Date
Method Type
Volume of gas sampled-dscfa
Percent moisture by volume
Average stack temperature-°F
Stack volumetric flow rate-dscfm
0
Stack volumetric flow rate-acfm
Percent isokinetic
Duration of run - minutes
Arsenic - probe, cyclone and filter catch
mg d
grains/dscf
Ib/hr
Arsenic - total catch
mg
grains/dscf
Ib/hr
Percent impinger catch
A-l
6/26/77
Arsenic
47.68
6.81
216
201030
317387
100.4
153
2.88
0.0009
1.603
6.11
0.0020
3.401
53
A-2
6/27/77
Arsenic
49.79
6.13
219
209891
331839
100.4
153
9.89
0.0031
5.503
13.30
0.0041
7.400
26
A- 3
6/28/77
Arsenic
50.21
1.39
221
222719
334661
95.4
153
4 . 72
o!o014
2.761
5.80
0.0018
3.393
19
Dry standard cubic feet @ 68°F, 29.92 in. Hg
3Dry standard cubic feet per minute @ 68°F, 29.92 in. Hg
^i
'Actual cubic feet per minute-stack conditions
Grains per dry standard cubic feet
-------
CO
Table 2-3. SUMMARY OF ARSENIC RESULTS AT SOUTH OUTLET OF THE REVERBERATORY
FURNACES (POINT SB)
Metric Units
Run Number
Date
Method Type
Volume of gas sampled-Nm3 a
Percent moisture by volume
Average stack temperature-°C
Stack volumetric flow rate-Nm3/min
Stack volumetric flow rate-Am3/min
Percent Isokinetic
Duration of run - minutes
Arsenic - probe, cyclone and filter catch
mg
g/Nm3
Kg/hr
Arsenic - total catch
mg
g/Nm3
Kg/hr
Percent impinger catch
SB-1
6/26/77
Arsenic
0.44
14.19
420
560
1767
95.8
120
128.8
0.293
9.834
129.7
0.295
9.902
SB-2
6/27/77
Arsenic
0.67
13.36
408
625
1928
97.7
120
901.8
1.803
67.55
912.0
1.824
. 68.31
SB-3
6/28/77
Arsenic
0.68
25.19
323
736
2292
113.4
120
954.6
1.395
61.56
1012.0
1.479
65.27
Normal cubic meters at 20°C, 760 mm Hg
Actual cubic meters per minute
-------
Table 2-4.
SUMMARY OF ARSENIC RESULTS AT SOUTH OUTLET OF THE
REVERBERATORY FURNACES (POINT SB)
English Units
Run Number
Date
Method Type
Volume of gas sampled-dscfa
Percent moisture by volume
Average stack temperature-°F
Stack volumetric flow rate-dscfm
Q
Stack volumetric flow rate-acfm
Percent isokinetic
Duration of run - minutes
Arsenic - probe, cyclone and filter catch
mg d
grains/dscf
Ib/hr
Arsenic - total catch
mg -.
grains/dscf
Ib/hr
Percent impinger catch
SB-1
6/26/77
Arsenic
15.
14.
787
19759
62397
95.
120
128.
0.
21.
129.
0.
21.
49
19
8
8
128
68
7
129
83
SB-2
6/27/77
Arsenic
17.
13.
766
22057
68061
97.
120
901.
0.
148.
912.
0.
150.
63
36
7
8
788
9
0
797
6
SB-3
6/28/77
Arsenic
24.
25.
614
25981
80944
113.
120
954.
0.
135.
1012.
0.
143.
12
19
4
6
610
7
0
646
9
lDry standard cubic feet @ 68°F, 29.92 in. Hg
5Dry standard cubic feet per minute @ 68°F, 29.92 in. Hg
•^
'Actual cubic feet per minute-stack conditions
Grains per dry standard cubic feet
-------
Table 2-5.
SUMMARY OF ARSENIC RESULTS AT NORTH OUTLET OF
THE REVERBERATORY FURNACES (POINT NB)
Metric Units
Run Number
Date
Method Type
Volume of gas sampled-Nm3
Percent moisture by volume
Average stack temperature-°C
Stack volumetric flow rate-Nm3/min
Stack volumetric flow rate-Am3/min
Percent Isokinetic
Duration of run - minutes
Arsenic - probe, cyclone and filter catch
mg
g/Nm3
Kg/hr
Arsenic - total catch
mg
g/Nm3
Kg/hr
Percent impinger catch
NB-1
6/26/77
Arsenic
0.91
6.86
500
1095
3555
103.8
120
98.85
0.108
7.083
255.70
0.279
18.32
NB-2
6/27/77
Arsenic
1.03
17.92
419
1198
3963
107.1
120
683.90
0.661
47.48
698.80
0.676
48.52
NB-3
6/28/77
Arsenic
1.05
19.00
401
1145
3721
112.7
120
691.00
0.664
45.62
756.20
0.727
49.92
61
Normal cubic meters at 20°C, 760 mm Hg
Actual cubic meters per minute
-------
Table 2-6.
SUMMARY OF ARSENIC RESULTS AT NORTH OUTLET OF THE
REVERBERATORY FURNACES (POINT NB)
English Units
Run Number
Date
Method Type
Volume of gas sampled-dscfa
Percent moisture by volume
Average stack temperature-°F
Stack volumetric flow rate-dscfm
Q
Stack volumetric flow rate-acfm
Percent isokinetic
Duration of run - minutes
Arsenic - probe, cyclone and filter catch
mg d
grains/dscf
Ib/hr
Arsenic - total catch
mg d
grains/dscf
Ib/hr
Percent impinger catch
NB-1
6/26/77
Arsenic
32.
6.
932
30
86
38664
125531
103.
120
98.
0.
15.
255.
0.
40.
8
85
047
61
70
122
39
NB-2
6/27/77
Arsenic
36
17
786
42288
139933
107
120
683
0
104
698
0
107
.46
.92
.1
.90
.289
.7
.80
.295
.0
NB-3
6/28/77
Arsenic
36
19
753
40421
131396
112
120
691
0
100
756
0
110
.65
.00
.7
.00
.290
.6
.20
.318
.1
61
Dry standard cubic feet @ 68°F, 29.92 in. Hg
'Dry standard cubic feet per minute @ 68°F, 29.92 in. Hg
••
'Actual cubic feet per minute-stack conditions
Grains per dry standard cubic feet
-------
Table 2-7.
SUMMARY OF ARSENIC RESULTS AT THE OUTLET OF THE ROASTERS (POINT C)
Metric Units
Run Number
Date
Method Type
Volume of gas sampled-Nm3 a
Percent moisture by volume
Average stack temperature-°C
Stack volumetric flow rate-Nm3/min
to Stack volumetric flow rate-Am3/min
Percent Isokinetic
Duration of run - minutes
Arsenic - probe, cyclone and filter catch
mg
g/Nm3
Kg/hr
Arsenic - total catch
mg
g/Nm3
Kg/hr
Percent impinger catch
C-l
6/26/77
Arsenic
1.71
6.70
78
3991
5862
102.4
116
23.43
0.014
3.266
39.45
0.023
5.499
C-2
6/27/77
Arsenic
1.23
5.32
99
4241
6502
66.8
120
22.67
0.018
4.680
29.03
0.024
5.993
C-3
6/28/77
Arsenic
0.75
9.41
111
1587
2629
109.2
120
53.78
0.071
6.800
65.47
0.087
8.278
41
22
18
Normal cubic meters at 20°C, 760 mm Hg
Actual cubic meters per minute
-------
Table 2-8.
SUMMARY OF ARSENIC RESULTS AT THE
OUTLET OF THE ROASTERS (POINT C)
English Units
Run Number
Date
Method Type
Volume of gas sampled-dscfa
Percent moisture by volume
Average stack temperature-°F
Stack volumetric flow rate-dscfm
Stack volumetric flow rate-acfm
Percent isokinetic
Duration of run - minutes
Arsenic - probe, cyclone and filter catch
mg d
grains/dscf
Ib/hr
Arsenic - total catch
mg d
grains/dscf
Ib/hr
Percent impinger catch
C-l
6/26/77
Arsenic
60. 53
6.70
173
140927
207004
102.4
116
23.43
0.006
7.200
39.45
0.010
12.12
C-2
6/27/77
Arsenic
43.43
5.32
211
149764
229606
66.8
120
22.67
0.008
10.32
29.03
0.010
13.21
C-3
6/28/77
Arsenic
26.53
9.41
231
56040
92832
109.2
120
53.78
0.031
14.99
65.47
0.038
18.25
41
Dry standard cubic feet @ 68°F, 29.92 in. Hg
DDry standard cubic feet per minute @ 68°F, 29.92 in. Hg
'Actual cubic feet per minute-stack conditions
Grains per dry standard cubic feet
22
18
-------
Table 2-9.
SUMMARY OF ARSENIC RESULTS AT THE INLET
OF THE HjjSO^ PLANT (POINT D)
Metric Units
Run Number
Date
Method Type
Volume of gas sampled-Nm3 a
Percent moisture by volume
Average stack temperature-°C
Stack volumetric flow rate-Nm3/min
Stack volumetric flow rate-Am3/min
Percent Isokinetic
Duration of run - minutes
Arsenic - probe, cyclone and filter catch
mg
g/Nm3
Kg/hr
Arsenic - total catch
mg
g/Nm3
Kg/hr
Percent impinger catch
D-l
6/21/77
Arsenic
1. 77
2. 07
222
1653
3257
98.5
105
3923.00
2.210
219.0
4181.00
2.355
233.4
D-2
6/22/77
Arsenic
1. 24
5.72
209
1563
3116
112.2
96
230.50
0.185
17.38
283.70
0.228
21.39
D-3
6/23/77
Arsenic
1.17
4 . 9,4
200
1553
3003
106.0
96
289. 30
0.248
23.08
305.50
0.262
24. 37
19
Normal cubic meters at 20°C, 760 mm Hg
Actual cubic meters per minute
-------
Table 2-10. SUMMARY OF ARSENIC RESULTS AT THE INLET OF THE H2SOi, PLANT (POINT D)
English Units
Run Number
Date
Method Type
Volume of gas sampled-dscfa
Percent moisture by volume
Average stack temperature-°F
Stack volumetric flow rate-dscfm
Stack volumetric flow rate-acfmc
Percent isokinetic
Duration of run - minutes
Arsenic - probe, cyclone and filter catch
mg d
grains/dscf
Ib/hr
Arsenic - total catch
mg d
grains/dscf
Ib/hr
Percent impinger catch
D-l
6/21/77
Arsenic
62.57
2.07
431
58353
114991
98.5
105
3923.00
0.966
482.9
4181.00
1.029
514.6
D-2
6/22/77
Arsenic
43.82
5.72
408
55189
110041
112.2
96
230.50
0.081
38.32
283.70
0.100
47.16
D-3
6/23/77
Arsenic
41.15
4.94
392
54842
106024
106.0
96
289. 30
0.108
50.88
305.50
0.114
53.73
Dry standard cubic feet @ 68°F, 29.92 in. Hg
3Dry standard cubic feet per minute @ 68°F, 29.92 in. Hg
•*
'Actual cubic feet per minute-stack conditions
Grains per dry standard cubic feet
19
-------
Table 2-11. SUMMARY OF ARSENIC RESULTS AT OUTLET OF THE H2SO,4 PLANT (POINT E)
Metric Units
Run Number
Date
Method Type
Volume of gas sampled-Nm3
Percent moisture by volume
Average stack temperature-°C
Stack volumetric flow rate-Nm3/min
Stack volumetric flow rate-Am3/min
Percent Isokinetic
Duration of run - minutes
Arsenic - probe, cyclone and filter catch
mg
g/Nm3
Kg/hr
Arsenic - total catch
mg
g/Nm3
Kg/hr
Percent impinger catch
E-l
6/21/77
Arsenic
1.
0
64
1929
2542
73.
132
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
13
64
0
27
0002
019
31
0002
022
E-2
6/22/77
Arsenic
1
0
64
1885
2485
76
132
2
0
0
4
0
0
42
.52
.2
.75
.0018
.205
.77
.0031
.355
E-3
6/23/77
Arsenic
1.
0
66
1875
2475
96.
132
2.
0.
0.
2.
0.
0.
3
91
4
06
0011
121
13
0011
126
E-4
6/24/77
Arsenic
1.
0
69
1831
2441
97.
132
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
41
88
4
39
0002
023
66
0004
038
Normal cubic meters at 20°C, 760 mm Hg
Actual cubic meters per minute
-------
Table 2-12.
SUMMARY OF ARSENIC RESULTS AT OUTLET OF THE H2SOI+ PLANT (POINT E)
English Units
Run Number
Date
Method Type
Volume of gas sampled-dscf
Percent moisture by volume
Average stack temperature- °F
Stack volumetric flow rate-dscfm
Stack volumetric flow rate-acfmc
Percent isokinetic
Duration of run - minutes
Arsenic - probe, cyclone and filter catch
grains/dscf
Ib/hr
Arsenic - total catch
mg d
grains/dscf
Ib/hr
Percent impinger catch
*Dry standard cubic feet @ 68°F, 29.92 in. Hg
DDry standard cubic feet per minute @ 68°F, 29.92 in. Hg
•^
"Actual cubic feet per minute-stack conditions
Grains per dry standard cubic feet
E-l
6/21/77
Arsenic
57.
0
147
68108
89776
73.
132
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
13
89
0
27
0001
043
31
0001
048
E-2
6/22/77
Arsenic
53.
0
147
66574
87757
76.
132
2.
0.
0.
4.
0.
0.
42
54
2
75
0008
452
77
0014
783
E-3
6/23/77
Arsenic
67
0
151
66214
87390
96
132
2
0
0
2
0
0
3
.37
.4
.06
.0005
.267
.13
.0005
.277
E-4
6/24/77
Arsenic
66.
0
156
64643
86208
97.
132
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
41
49
4
39
0001
050
66
0002
085
-------
Table 2-13.
SUMMARY OF PARTICULATE RESULTS AT THE INLET OF THE STACK (POINT A)
Metric Units
CD
Run Number
Date
Method Type
Volume of gas sampled-Nm3 a
Percent moisture by volume
Average stack temperature-°C
Stack volumetric flow rate-Nm3/min
Stack volumetric flow rate-Am3/min
Percent Isokinetic
Duration of run - minutes
Particulate - probe, cyclone and filter catch
mg
g/Nm3
Kg/hr
Particulate - total catch
mg
g/Nm3
Kg/hr
Percent impinger catch
A-4
6/28/77
EPA-5
1.51
10.66
105
6101
10118
104.6
153
168.1
0.111
40.73
214.1
0.142
51.87
22
A-5
6/30/77
EPA-5
1.54
8.6R
105
6606
10724
98.9
153
131.5
0.085
33.70
169.0
0.109
43.30
22
Normal cubic meters at 20°C, 760 mm Hg
Actual cubic meters per minute
-------
Table 2-14.
SUMMARY OF PARTICULATE RESULTS AT INLET OF THE STACK (POINT A)
English Units
Run Number
Date
Method Type
Volume of gas sampled-dscfa
Percent moisture by volume
Average stack temperature-°F
Stack volumetric flow rate-dscfm
Q
Stack volumetric flow rate-acfm
Percent isokinetic
Duration of run - minutes
Particulates - probe, cyclone and filter catch
mg d
grains/dscf
Ib/hr
Particulates - total catch
mg d
grains/dscf
Ib/hr
Percent impinger catch
A-4
6/28/77
EPA-5
53.23
10.66
220
215414
357285
104.6
153
168.1
0.0486
89.79
214.1
0.0619
114.4
22
Dry standard cubic feet @ 68°F, 29.92 in. Hg
Dry standard cubic feet per minute 0 68°F, 29.92 in. Hg
•»
'Actual cubic feet per minute-stack conditions
Grains per dry standard cubic feet
A-5
6/30/77
EPA-5
54.50
8.68
220
233278
378662
98.9
153
131.5
0.0372
74.28
169.0
0.0478
95.47
22
-------
Table 2-15.
SUMMARY OF PARTICULATE RESULTS AT SOUTH OUTLET
OF THE REVERBERATORY FURNACES (POINT SB)
Metric Units
N)
o
Run Number
Date
Method Type
Volume of gas sampled-Nm3
Percent moisture by volume
Average stack temperature-°C
Stack volumetric flow rate-Nm3/min
Stack volumetric flow rate-Am3/min
Percent Isokinetic
Duration of run - minutes
Particulate - probe, cyclone and filter catch
mg
g/Nm3
Kg/hr
Particulate - total catch
mg
g/Nm3
Kg/hr
Percent impinger catch
SB-4
6/28/77
EPA-5
0.57
9.55
400
637
1854
109.7
120
1294.0
2.258
86.28
1429.0
2.493
95.28
SB-5
6/30/77
EPA- 5
0.67
12.82
727
2153
112.3
120
8233.0
12.294
536.2
8273.0
12.354
538.8
0.5
Normal cubic meters at 20°C, 760 mm Hg
Actual cubic meters per minute
-------
Table 2-16.
SUMMARY OF PARTICULATE RESULTS AT SOUTH OUTLET
OF THE REVERBERATORY FURNACES (POINT SB)
English Units
Run Number
Date
Method Type
Volume of gas sampled-dscf
Percent moisture by volume
Average stack temperature-°F
Stack volumetric flow rate-dscfm
Stack volumetric flow rate-acfm
Percent isokinetic
Duration of run - minutes
Particulates - probe, cyclone and filter catch
mg d
grains/dscf
Ib/hr
Particulates - total catch
mg d
grains/dscf
Ib/hr
Percent impinger catch
*Dry standard cubic feet @ 68°F, 29.92 in. Hg
DDry standard cubic feet per minute @ 68°F, 29.92 in. Hg
'Actual cubic feet per minute-stack conditions
Grains per dry standard cubic feet
SB-4
6/28/77
EPA-5
20.20
9.55
751
22504
65478
109.7
120
1294.0
0.986
190.2
1429.0
1.089
210.1
SB-5
6/30/77
EPA-5
23.60
12.82
728
25680
76020
112.3
120
8233.0
5.371
1182.1
8273.0
5.397
1187.9
0.5
-------
Table 2-17.
SUMMARY OF PARTICULATE RESULTS AT NORTH OUTLET
OF THE REVERBERATORY FURNACE (POINT NB)
Metric Units
to
KJ
Run Number
Date
Method Type
Volume of gas sampled-Nm3 a
Percent moisture by volume
Average stack temperature-°C
Stack volumetric flow rate-Ni"3/min
Stack volumetric flow rate-Am3/min
Percent Isokinetic
Duration of run - minutes
Particulate - probe, cyclone and filter catch
mg
g/Nm3
Kg/hr
Particulate - total catch
mg
g/Nm3
Kg/hr
Percent impinger catch
NB-4
6/28/77
EPA-5
1.02
18.76
364
1152
3537
109.8
120
4901.00
4.802
332.0
5111.00
5.00R
346.2
NB-5
6/30/77
EPA-5
1.01
16.10
356
1130
3312
111.6
120
3431.00
3.374
228.6
3570.00
3. 511
237.9
Normal cubic meters at 20°C, 760 mm Hg
Actual cubic meters per minute
-------
Table 2-18.
SUMMARY OF PARTICULATE RESULTS AT NORTH OUTLET
OF THE REVERBERATORY FURNACE (POINT NB)
English Units
10
u>
Run Number
Date
Method Type
Volume of gas sampled-dscf
Percent moisture by volume
Average stack temperature-°F
Stack volumetric flow rate-dscfm
Stack volumetric flow rate-acfm°
Percent isokinetic
Duration of run - minutes
Particulates - probe, cyclone and filter catch
mg d
grains/dscf
Ib/hr
Particulates - total catch
mg d
grains/dscf
Ib/hr
Percent impinger catch
Dry standard cubic feet @ 68°F, 29.92 in. Hg
5Dry standard cubic feet per minute ? 68°F, 29.92 in. Hg
•^
'Actual cubic feet per minute-stack conditions
Grains per dry standard cubic feet
NB-4
6/28/77
EPA-5
35.98
18.76
687
40711
124891
109.8
120
4901.00
2.098
732.0
5111.00
2.188
763.3
NB-5
6/30/77
EPA-5
35.84
16.10
672
39889
116936
111.6
120
3431.00
1.474
504.0
3570.00
1.534
524.4
-------
Table 2-19.
SUMMARY OF PARTICULATE RESULTS AT THE OUTLET
OF THE ROASTERS (POINT C)
Metric Units
K)
Run Number
Date
Method Type
Volume of gas sampled-Nm3
Percent moisture by volume
Average stack temperature-°C
Stack volumetric flow rate-Nm3/min
Stack volumetric flow rate-Am3/min
Percent Isokinetic
Duration of run - minutes
Particulate - probe, cyclone and filter catch
mg
g/Nm3
Kg/hr
Particulate - total catch
mg
g/Nm3
Kg/hr
Percent impinger catch
C-4
6/28/77
EPA-5
1.03
9.20
88
1953
3036
122.0
120
5322.00
5.139
601.8
5394.00
5.209
609.9
C-5
6/30/77
EPA-5
0.63
10.48
91
1791
2855
108.5
90
2834.00
4.472
480.4
2868.00
4.526
486.2
Normal cubic meters at 20°C, 760 mm Hg
Actual cubic meters per minute
-------
Table 2-20.
SUMMARY OF PARTICULATE RESULTS AT THE OUTLET
OF THE ROASTERS (POINT C)
English Units
to
Ul
Run Number
Date
Method Type
Volume of gas sampled-dscfa
Percent moisture by volume
Average stack temperature-°F
Stack volumetric flow rate-dscfm
Stack volumetric flow rate-acfmc
Percent isokinetic
Duration of run - minutes
Particulates - probe, cyclone and filter catch
mg d
grains/dscf
Ib/hr
Particulates - total catch
mg
grains/dscf
Ib/hr
Percent impinger catch
C-4
6/28/77
EPA-5
36.50
9.20
190
68948
107214
122.0
120
5322.00
2.245
1326.7
5394.00
2.276
1344.7
Dry standard cubic feet @ 68°F, 29.92 in. Hg
Dry standard cubic feet per minute (? 6R°F, 29.92 in. Hg
cActual cubic feet per minute-stack conditions
Grains per dry standard cubic feet
C-5
6/30/77
EPA-5
22.34
10.48
197
63256
100796
108.5
90
2834.00
1.954
1059.2
2868.00
1.977
1071.9
-------
Table 2-21. CASCADE IMPACTOR PAKTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FOR RUN C-l (Metric)
INPUT VARIABLE UNITS INPUT DATA
SAMPLING TIME MIN
PRESSURE DKOP CM HG
STATIC PRESSURE CM H20
PARTICLE DENSITY G/CC
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE CM HG
GAS MOL WT
GAS TEMPERATURE DEG C
GAS VISCOSITY POISE
GAS DENSITY G/CC
STAGE WT OF MATERIAL UPC MG/ACM
CYCLONE 202.8* 95.5H
1 0."+11 1.76 0.19
to
°" 2 0.033 1.01 0.02
3 0.083 U.67 O.Ot
H 0.059 0.31 0.03
5 0.102 U.m 0.05
FILTER 1.200 0.57
0.5
13.21
-0.51
3.00
66.55
28.5
58.9
0.00019
0,00091
WT PCNT
99.08
0.20
0.02
o.ot
0.03
0.05
0.59
CUM WT PCNT
100.00
0.92
0.72
0.71
0.66
0.6<»
0.59
-------
Table 2-22. CASCADE IMPACTOR PAKTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FOR RUN C-l (English)
INPUT VARIABLE UNITS INPUT DATA
SAMPLING TIME MIN
PRESSURE DROP IN HG
STATIC PRESSURE IN H20
PARTICLE DENSITY G/CC
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE IN HG
GAS MOL WT
GAS TEMPERATURE DEG F
GAS VISCOSITY POISE
GAS DENSITY G/CC
STATE WT OF MATERIAL OPC MG/ACF
CYCLONE 202.8* 3373.73
1 O.«*ll 1.76 6. 8t
NJ
^ 2 0.033 1.01 0.55
3 0.083 0.67 1.38
1 0.059 0.31 0.98
5 0.102 O.li* 1.70
FILTER 1.200 19.96
0.5
5.20
-0.20
3.00
26.20
28.5
138.0
0.00019
0.00091
WT PCNT
99.08
0.20
0.02
0.0
-------
OO
Table 2-23. CASCADE IMPACTOR PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FOR RUN SB-2 (Metric)
INPUT VARIABLE UNITS INPUT DATA
STAGE
CYCLONE
1
2
3
<+
5
FILTER
SAMPLING TIME WIN
PRESSURE DKOP CM HG
STATIC PRESSURE CM H20
PARTICLE DENSITY G/CC
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE CM HG
GAS MOL WT
GAS TEMPERATURE DEG C
GAS VISCOSITY POISE
GAS DENSITY G/CC
WT OF MATERIAL UPC MG/ACM
9.290 6.77
2.178 1.82 1.59
0.798 l.OH 0.58
0.713 0.68 0.51*
2.5<42 0.31 1.85
o.mo o.is 0.30
0.500 0.36
0.3
11.68
-0.36
3.00
66.55
28.5
85.0
0.00020
0.00085
WT PCNT
56.«t«*
13.23
f.85
<*.51
15. t«*
2.49
3. Of
CUM WT PCNT
100.00
<+3.56
30,33
25.1+8
20.97
5.53
3.01
-------
ro
Table 2-24. CASCADE IMPACTOR PAKJICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FOR RUN SB-2 (English)
INPUT VARIABLE UNITS INPUT DATA
STATE
CYCLONE
1
2
3
1
5
FILTER
SAMPLING TIME MIN
PRESSURE DROP IN HG
STATIC PRESSURE IN H20
PARTICLE DENSITY G/CC
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE IN HG
GAS MOL WT
GAS TEMPERATURE DEC F
GAS VISCOSITY POISE
GAS DENSITY G/CC
WT OF MATERIAL OPC MG/ACF
9.290 239.08
2.178 1.82 56.05
0.798 1.01 20.51
0.713 0.66 19.12
2.512 0.31 65.42
0.110 0.15 10.55
0.500 12.87
0.3
4.60
-0.11
3.00
26.20
28.5
185.0
0.00020
0.00085
WT PCNT
56. «m
13.23
1.85
H.51
15.<+H
2.19
3.01
CUM WT PCNT
100.00
13.56
30.33
25.18
20.97
5.53
3.01
-------
Table 2-25,
CASCADE IMPACTOR PAKTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FOR RUN SB-3 (Metric)
IMPUT VARIABLE UNITS INPUT DATA
STAGE
CYCLONE
1
2
3
4
5
FILTER
SAMPLING TIME MIN
PRESSURE DKOP CM HG
STATIC PRESSURE CM H20
PARTICLE DENSITY G/CC
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE CM HG
GAS MOL WT
GAS TEMPERATURE DEG C
GAS VISCOSITY POISE
GAS DENSITY G/CC
WT OF MATERIAL DPC MG/ACM
11.520 11.05
0.044 1.81 0.04
0.294 1.04 0.28
0.255 0.68 0.24
0.222 0.31 0.21
0.134 0.14 0.13
0.500 0.48
0.3
11.68
-0.36
3.00
66.55
28.5
87.2
0.00020
0.00085
WT PCNT
88.83
0.34
2.27
1.97
1.71
1.03
3.86
CUM WT PCNT
100.00
11.17
10.83
8.57
6.60
4.89
3.86
-------
Table 2-26. CASCADE IMPACTOR PAKTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FOR RUN SB-3 (English)
INPUT VARIABLE UNITS INPUT DATA
STATE
CYCLONE
1
2
3
1
5
FILTER
SAMPLING TIME WIN
PRESSURE DROP IN HG
STATIC PRESSURE IN H20
PARTICLE DENSITY G/CC
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE IN HG
GAS MOL WT
GAS TEMPERATURE DEG F
GAS VISCOSITY POISE
GAS DENSITY G/CC
WT OF MATERIAL DPC MG/ACF
11.520 390.27
0.014 1.81 1.19
0.291 1.01 9.96
0.255 0.68 8.61
0.222 0.31 7.52
0.131 0.11 1.51
0.500 16.91
0.3
1.60
-0.11
3.00
26.20
28.5
189.0
0.00020
0.00085
WT PCNT
88.83
0.31
2.27
1.97
1.71
1.03
3.86
CUM WT PCNT
100.00
11.17
10.83
8.57
6.60
1.89
3.86
-------
U>
N>
Table 2-27. CASCADE IMPACTOR PAKTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FOR RUN NB-H (Metric)
INPUT VARIABLE UNITS INPUT DATA
STAGK
CYCLONE
1
2
3
<*
5
FILTLR
SAMPLING TIME MIN
PRESSURE DROP CM HG
STATIC PRESSURE CM H20
PARTICLE DENSITY G/CC
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE CM HG
GAS MOL WT
GAS TEMPERATURE DEG C
GAS VISCOSITY POISE
GAS DENSITY G/CC
WT OF MATERIAL UPC MG/ACM
«*.080 5.05
O.OH9 2.08 0.06
0.036 1.20 0.0<»
0.060 0.79 0.07
0.370 0.38 0.46
0.112 0.20 O.m
O.HOO O.H9
0.3
6.60
-0.71
3.00
66.55
28.5
85.0
0.00020
0.00085
WT PCNT
79.89
0.96
0.70
1.17
7.2«»
2.19
7.83
CUM WT PCNT
100.00
20.11
19.15
18. H5
17.27
10.03
7.83
-------
OJ
CO
Table 2-28. CASCADE IMPACTOR PAKTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FOR RUN NB-1 (English)
INPUT VARIABLE UNITS INPUT DATA
STATE
CYCLONE
1
2
3
1
5
FILTER
SAMPLING TIME
PRESSURE DROP
STATIC PRESSURE
PARTICLE DENSITY
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
GAS MOL WT
GAS TEMPERATURE
GAS VISCOSITY
GAS DENSITY
WT OF MATERIAL DPC
1.060
0.019 2.08
0.036 1.20
0.060 0.79
0.370 0.38
0.112 0.20
0.400
MIN
IN HG
IN H20
G/CC
IN HG
DEG F
POISE
G/CC
MG/ACF
178.16
2.1H
1.57
2.62
16.16
4.89
17.17
0.3
2.60
-0.28
3.00
26.20
28.5
185.0
0.00020
0.00085
WT PCNT
79.89
0.96
0.70
1.17
7.21
2.19
7.83
CUM WT PCNT
100.00
20.11
19.15
18.15
17.27
10.03
7.83
-------
Table 2-29. CASCADE IMPACTOR PAKTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FOR RUN C-5 (Metric)
INPUT VARIABLE UNITS INPUT DATA
STAGE:
CYCLONE
i
2
3
H
5
FILTER
SAMPLING TIME WIN
PRESSURE DROP CM HG
STATIC PRESSURE CM H20
PARTICLE DENSITY G/CC
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE CM HG
GAS MOL WT
GAS TEMPERATURE DEG C
GAS VISCOSITY POISE
GAS DENSITY G/CC
WT OF MATERIAL UPC MG/ACM
m.870 10. H6
0.582 1.75 O.m
0.038 1.00 0.03
0.082 0.66 0.06
0.099 0.30 0.07
0.092 O.m 0.06
0.300 0.21
0.3
13.<»6
-0.51
3.00
66,55
28.5
63.3
0.00019
0.00091
WT PCNT
92.57
3.62
0.2«*
0.51
0.62
0.57
1.87
CUM WT PCNT
100.00
7.H3
3.80
3.57
3.06
2.HH
1.67
-------
Table 2-30. CASCADE IMPACTOR PAKTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FOR RUN C-5 (English)
INPUT VARIABLE UNITS INPUT DATA
STATE
CYCLONE
1
2
3
4
5
FILTER
SAMPLING TIME MIN
PRESSURE DROP IN HG
STATIC PRESSURE IN H20
PARTICLE DENSITY G/CC
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE IN HG
GAS MOL WT
GAS TEMPERATURE DEC F
GAS VISCOSITY POISE
GAS DENSITY G/CC
WT OF MATERIAL UPC MG/ACF
14.870 369.51
0.582 1.75 14. «*6
0.038 1.00 0.94
0.082 0.66 2.04
0.099 0.30 2.46
0.092 O.m 2.29
0.300 7.45
0.3
5.30
-0.20
3.00
26.20
28.5
146.0
0.00019
0.00091
WT PCNT
92.57
3.62
0.24
0.51
0.62
0.57
1.87
CUM WT PCNT
100.00
7.43
3.80
3.57
3.06
2.44
1.87
-------
cr>
Table 2-31. CASCADE IMPACTOR PAKTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FOR RUN C-6 (Metric)
IMPUT VARIABLE UNITS INPUT DATA
STAGE
CYCLONE
1
2
3
<*
5
FILTER
SAMPLING TIME MIN
PRESSURE DKOP CM HG
STATIC PRESSURE CM H20
PARTICLE DENSITY G/CC
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE CM HG
GAS MOL WT
GAS TEMPERATURE DEG C
GAS VISCOSITY POISE
GAS DENSITY G/CC
WT OF MATERIAL UPC MG/ACM
11.880 5.51
0.262 1.89 0.12
0.071 1.09 0.03
0.063 0.72 0.03
0.212 0.3<» 0.10
0.022 0.17 0.01
0.100 0.05
0.6
9.65
-0.51
3.00
66.55
28.5
63.3
0.00019
0.00091
WT PCNT
9H.21
2.08
0.56
0.50
1.68
0.17
0.79
CUM WT PCNT
100.00
5.79
3.71
3.15
2.65
0.97
0.79
-------
Table 2-32. CASCADE IMPACTOR PAKTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FOR RUN C-6 (English)
INPUT VARIABLE UNITS INPUT DATA
STATE
CYCLONE
1
2
3
4
5
FILTER
SAMPLING TIME MIN
PRESSURE DROP IN HG
STATIC PRESSURE IN H20
PARTICLE DENSITY G/CC
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE IN HG
GAS MOb WT
GAS TEMPERATURE DEC F
GAS VISCOSITY POISE
GAS DENSITY G/CC
WT OF MATERIAL DPC MG/ACF
11.880 194.48
0.262 1.89 4.29
0.071 1.09 1.16
0.063 0.72 1.03
0.212 0.34 3.47
0.022 0.17 0.36
0.100 1.64
0.6
3.80
-0.20
3.00
26.20
28.5
146.0
0.00019
0.00091
WT PCNT
94.21
2.08
0.56
0.50
1.68
0.17
0.79
•
CUM WT PCNT
100.00
5.79
3.71
3.15
2.65
0.97
0.79
-------
U)
c»
Table 2-33. CASCADE IMPACTOR PAKTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FOR RUN C-7 (Metric)
INPUT VARIABLE UNITS INPUT DATA
STAGE
CYCLONE
1
2
3
4
5
FILTER
SAMPLING TIME MIN
PRESSURE DKOP CM HG
STATIC PRESSURE CM H20
PARTICLE DENSITY G/CC
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE CM HG
GAS MOL WT
GAS TEMPERATURE DEG C
GAS VISCOSITY POISE
GAS DENSITY G/CC
WT OF MATERIAL UPC MG/ACM
13.270 7.09
J.065 1.88 0.57
0.054 1.09 0.03
0.051 0.72 0.03
0.142 0.34 0.08
0.025 O.I? 0.01
1.700 0.91
0.5
9.65
-0.51
3.00
66.55
28.5
68.3
0.00019
0.00091
WT PCNT
81.38
6.53
0.33
0.31
0.87
0.15
10.42
CUM WT PCNT
100.00
18.62
12.09
11.76
11.45
10.58
10.42
-------
CO
Table 2-34. CASCADE IMPACTOR PAKTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FOR RUN C-7 (English)
INPUT VARIABLE UNITS INPUT DATA
STATE
CYCLONE
1
2
3
4
5
FILTER
SAMPLING TIME MIN
PRESSURE DKOP IN HG
STATIC PRESSURE IN H20
PARTICLE DENSITY G/CC
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE IN HG
GAS MOL WT
GAS TEMPERATURE DEG F
GAS VISCOSITY POISE
GAS DENSITY G/CC
WT OF MATERIAL OPC MG/ACF
13.270 250.36
1.065 1.88 20.09
0.054 1.09 1.02
0.051 0,72 0.96
0.142 0,34 2.68
0.025 0.17 0.47
1.700 32.07
0.5
3.80
-0.20
3.00
26.20
28.5
155.0
0.00019
0.00091
WT PCNT
81.38
6.53
0.33
0.31
0.87
0.15
10.42
CUM WT PCNT
100.00
18.62
12.09
11.76
11.45
10.58
10.42
-------
Table 2-35. CASCADE IMPACTOR PAKTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FOR RUN NB-B (Metric)
INPUT VARIABLE UNITS INPUT DATA
STAGE
CYCLONE
1
?
3
H
5
FILTER
SAMPLING TIME MIN
PRESSURE DROP CM HG
STATIC PRESSURE CM H20
PARTICLE DENSITY G/CC
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE CM HG
GAS MOL WT
GAS TEMPERATURE DEG C
GAS VISCOSITY POISE
GAS DENSITY G/CC
WT OF MATERIAL OPC MG/ACM
5.060 6.27
0.006 2.06 0.01
0.119 1.20 0.15
0.206 0.79 0.26
0.689 0.38 0.85
0.1<*2 0.20 0.18
0.000 0.00
0.3
6.60
-0.71
3.00
66.55
26.5
83.9
0.00020
0.00085
WT PCNT
81.32
0.10
1.91
3.31
11.07
2.28
0.00
CUM WT PCNT
100.00
18.68
18.58
16.67
13.36
2.28
-0.00
-------
Table 2-36. CASCADE IMPACTOR PAKTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FOR RUN NB-8 (English)
INPUT VARIABLE UNITS INPUT DATA
SAMPLING TIME
PRESSURE DROP
STATIC PRESSURE
PARTICLE DENSITY
MIN
IN HG
IN H20
G/CC
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE IN HG
STATE
CYCLONE
1
2
3
H
5
FILTER
GAS MOL WT
GAS TEMPERATURE
GAS VISCOSITY
GAS DENSITY
WT OF MATERIAL
5.060
0.006
0.119
0.206
0.689
0.1<+2
0.000
DEG F
POISE
G/CC
UPC MG/ACF
221.26
2.08 0.26
1.20 5.20
0.79 9.01
0.38 30.13
0.20 6.21
0.00
0.3
2.60
-0.28
3.00
26.20
28.5
183.0
0.00020
0.00085
WT PCNT
81.32
0.10
1.91
3.31
11.07
2.28
0.00
CUM WT PCNT
100.00
18.68
18.58
16.67
13.36
2.28
-0.00
-------
Table 2-37. CASCADE IMPACTOR PAHTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FOR RUN SB-9 (Metric)
INPUT VARIABLE UNITS INPUT DATA
SAMPLING TIME WIN
PRESSURE DKOP CM HG
STATIC PRESSURE CM H20
PARTICLE DENSITY G/CC
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE CM HG
GAS MOL WT
GAS TEMPERATURE DEG C
GAS VISCOSITY POISE
GAS DENSITY G/CC
STAGE WT OF MATERIAL DPC MG/ACM
CYCLONE O.«»20 0.31
1 0.171 1.82 0.13
•t*.
NJ
2 1.105 l.Of 0.81
3 0.097 0.69 0.07
1 0.752 0.31 0.55
5 1.H23 0.15 l.O1*
FILTER 0.000 0.00
0.3
11.68
-0.36
3.00
66.55
28.5
81.7
0.00020
0.00085
WT PCNT
10.58
«*.31
27.85
2.«»«*
18.95
35.86
0.00
CUM WT PCNT
100.00
89. «»2
85.11
57.26
5^.81
35.86
0.00
-------
u>
Table 2-38. CASCADE IMPACTOR PAKTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FOR RUN SB-9 (English)
INPUT VARIABLE UNITS INPUT DATA
STATE
CYCLONE
1
2
3
4
5
FILTER
SAMPLING TIME MIN
PRESSURE DROP IN HG
STATIC PRESSURE IN H20
PARTICLE DENSITY G/CC
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE IN HG
GAS MOL WT
GAS TEMPERATURE DEG F
GAS VISCOSITY POISE
GAS DENSITY G/CC
WT OF MATERIAL UPC MG/ACF
0.420 10.85
0.171 1.82 4.42
1.105 1.04 28.55
0.097 0.69 2.51
0.752 0.31 19.43
1.423 0.15 36.77
0.000 0.00
0.3
4.60
-0.14
3.00
26.20
28.5
179.0
0.00020
0.00085
WT PCNT
10.58
4.31
27.85
2.44
18.95
35.86
0.00
CUM WT PCNT
100.00
89.42
85.11
57.26
54.81
35.86
o.oo
-------
Table 2-39. CASCADE IMPACTOR PAKTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FOR RUN SB-10 (Metric)
INPUT VARIABLE UNITS INPUT DATA
STAGE
CYCLONE
1
2
3
1
5
FILTER
SAMPLING TIME MIN
PRESSURE DROP CM HG
STATIC PRESSURE CM H20
PARTICLE DENSITY G/CC
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE CM HG
GAS MOL WT
GAS TEMPERATURE DEG C
GAS VISCOSITY POISE
GAS DENSITY G/CC
WT OF MATERIAL UPC MG/ACM
O.H38 0.21
0.136 1.82 0.07
0.513 l.Oi* 0.26
0.998 0.68 0.48
1.763 0.31 0.85
0.388 0.15 0.19
0.600 0.29
0.5
11.68
-0.36
3.00
66.55
28.5
82.8
0.00020
0.00085
WT PCNT
9.00
2.79
11.16
20.51
36.23
7.97
12.33
CUM WT PCNT
100.00
91.00
88.20
77. 0«*
56. 5«*
20.30
12.33
-------
Table 2-40. CASCADE IMPACTOR PAKTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FOR RUN SB-10 (English)
INPUT VARIABLE UNITS INPUT DATA
SAMPLING TIME MIN
PRESSURE DROP IN HG
STATIC PRESSURE IN H20
PARTICLE DENSITY G/CC
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE IN HG
GAS MOL WT
GAS TEMPERATURE DEG F
GAS VISCOSITY POISE
GAS DENSITY G/CC
STATE WT OF MATERIAL DPC MG/ACF
CYCLONE 0.138 7.16
^ 1 0.136 1.82 2.32
ui
2 0.513 1.01 9.25
3 0.998 0.68 17.00
1 1.763 0.31 30.03
5 0.388 0.15 6.61
FILTER 0.600 10.22
0.5
1.60
-0.11
3.00
26.20
28.5
181.0
0.00020
0.00085
WT PCNT
9.00
2.79
11.16
20.51
36.23
7.97
12.33
CUM WT PCNT
100.00
91.00
88.20
77.01
56.51
20.30
12.33
-------
Table 2-41
cr>
CASCADE IMPACTOR PAKTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FOR RUN SB-11 (Metric)
INPUT VARIABLE UNITS INPUT DATA
STAGE
CYCLONE
1
2
3
1
5
FILTER
SAMPLING TIME
PRESSURE DKOP
STATIC PRESSURE
PARTICLE DENSITY
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
GAS MOL WT
GAS TEMPERATURE
GAS VISCOSITY
GAS DENSITY
WT OF MATERIAL
0.770
0.013
0.575
0.696
1.518
0.156
0.700
MIN
CM HG
CM H20
G/CC
CM HG
DEG C
POISE
G/CC
OPC MG/ACM
0.56
1.82 0.03
1.01 0.12
0.68 0.51
U.31 1.13
0.15 0.11
0.51
0.3
11.68
-0.36
3.00
66.55
28.5
81.1
0.00020
0.00085
WT PCNT
17.16
0.96
12.81
15.51
31.19
3.18
15.60
CUM WT PCNT
100.00
82.81
81.89
69.07
53.57
19.07
15.60
-------
Table 2-42. CASCADE IMPACTOR PAKflCLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FOR RUN SB-11 (English)
INPUT VARIABLE UNITS INPUT DATA
STATE
CYCLONE
1
2
3
4
5
FILTER
SAMPLING TIME MIN
PRESSURE DROP IN HG
STATIC PRESSURE IN H20
PARTICLE DENSITY G/CC
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE IN HG
GAS MOL WT
GAS TEMPERATURE DEG F
GAS VISCOSITY POISE
GAS DENSITY G/CC
WT OF MATERIAL UPC MG/ACF
0.770 19.83
0.043 1.82 1.11
0.575 1.04 14.81
0.696 0.68 17.92
1.548 0.31 39.86
0.156 0.15 <*.02
0.700 18.03
0.3
4.60
-0.14
3.00
26.20
28.5
184.0
0.00020
0.00085
WT PCNT
17.16
0.96
12.81
15.51
34.49
3.48
15.60
CUM WT PCNT
100.00
82.84
81.89
69.07
53.57
19.07
15.60
-------
CO
Table 2-43. CASCADE IMPACTOR PAKTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FOR RUN NB-12 (Metric)
INPUT VARIABLE UNITS INPUT DATA
STAGE
CYCLONE
1
O
<-
3
4
5
FILTER
SAMPLING TIME MIN
PRESSURE OKOP CM HG
STATIC PRESSURE CM H20
PARTICLE DENSITY G/CC
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE CM HG
GAS MOL WT
GAS TEMPERATURE DEG C
GAS VISCOSITY POISE
GAS DENSITY G/CC
WT OF MATERIAL OPC MG/ACM
18.730 17.54
0.060 2.07 0.06
0.048 1.20 0.04
0.176 0.79 0.16
0.614 0.38 0.57
0.143 0.20 0.13
1.400 1.31
0.3
6.60
-0.71
3.00
66.55
28.5
85.6
0.00020
0.00085
WT PCNT
88.47
0.28
0.23
0.83
2.90
0.68
6.61
CUM WT PCNT
100.00
11.53
11.25
11.02
10.19
7.29
6.61
-------
VD
Table 2-44. CASCADE IMPACTOR PAKTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FOR RUN NB-12 (English)
INPUT VARIABLE UNITS INPUT DATA
STATE
CYCLONE
1
2
3
1
5
FILTER
SAMPLING TIME MIN
PRESSURE OKOP IN HG
STATIC PRESSURE IN H20
PARTICLE DENSITY G/CC
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE IN HG
GAS MOL WT
GAS TEMPERATURE DEG F
GAS VISCOSITY POISE
GAS DENSITY G/CC
WT OF MATERIAL UPC MG/ACF
18.730 619.19
0.060 2.07 1.96
0.018 1.20 1.59
0.176 0.79 5.82
0.611 U.38 20.30
0.113 0.20 1.73
1.100 16.28
0.3
2.60
-0.28
3.00
26.20
28.5
186.0
0.00020
0.00085
WT PCNT
88.17
0.28
0.23
0.83
2.90
0.68
6.61
CUM WT PCNT
100.00
11.53
11.25
11.02
10.19
7.29
6.61
-------
Table 2-45. CASCADE IMPACTOR PAKTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FOR RUN NB-13 (Metric)
INPUT VARIABLE UNITS INPUT DATA
SAMPLING TIME WIN
PRESSURE DKOP CM HG
STATIC PRESSURE CM H20
PARTICLE DENSITY G/CC
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE CM HG
GAS MOL. WT
GAS TEMPERATURE DEG C
GAS VISCOSITY POISE
GAS DENSITY G/CC
STAGE WT OF MATERIAL UPC MG/ACM
CYCLONE 0.000 0.00
1 0.015 2.07 0.03
171
0 2 0.101 1.20 0.06
3 0.260 0.79 0.16
H 0.811 0.38 0.50
5 0.191 0.20 0.12
FILTER 0.100 0.25
0.5
6.60
-0.71
3.00
66.55
28.5
85.6
0.00020
0.00085
WT PCNT
0.00
2.48
5.58
11.36
11.95
10.55
22.09
CUM WT PCNT
100.00
100.00
97.52
91. 9U
77.58
32.63
22.09
-------
Table 2-46,
CASCADE IMPACTOR PAKTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FOR RUN NB-13 (English)
INPUT VARIABLE UNITS INPUT DATA
STATE
CYCLONE
1
2
3
H
5
FILTER
SAMPLING TIME MIN
PRESSURE DROP IN HG
STATIC PRESSURE IN H20
PARTICLE DENSITY G/CC
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE IN HG
GAS MOL WT
GAS TEMPERATURE DEG F
GAS VISCOSITY POISE
GAS DENSITY G/CC
WT OF MATERIAL UPC MG/ACF
0.000 0.00
0.0»*5 2.07 0.98
0.101 1.20 2.20
0.260 0.79 5.67
0.8m U.38 17.76
0.191 0.20 H.17
O.HOO 8.73
0.5
2.60
-0.28
3.00
26.20
28.5
186.0
0.00020
0.00085
WT PCNT
0.00
2.
-------
Table 2-47. CASCADE IMPACTOR PAKTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FOR RUN C-14 (Metric)
INPUT VARIABLE UNITS INPUT DATA
en
N)
STAGE
CYCLONE
1
2
3
4
5
FILTER
SAMPLING TIME MIN
PRESSURE DROP CM HG
STATIC PRESSURE CM H20
PARTICLE DENSITY G/CC
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE CM HG
GAS MOL WT
GAS TEMPERATURE DEG C
GAS VISCOSITY POISE
GAS DENSITY G/CC
WT OF MATERIAL UPC MG/ACM
2.820 1.29
0.519 1.74 0.24
0.010 1.00 0.00
0.061 0.66 0.03
0.275 0,30 0.13
0.020 O.m 0.01
1.000 0.46
0.5
13.72
-0.51
3.00
66.55
28.5
66.1
0.00019
0.00091
WT PCNT
59.9«»
11.03
0.21
1.30
5.84
0.43
21.25
CUM WT PCNT
100.00
40.06
29.03
28.82
27.52
21.68
21.25
-------
Ul
Table 2-48. CASCADE IMPACTOR PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FOR RUN C-l«* (English)
INPUT VARIABLE UNITS INPUT DATA
STATE
CYCLONE
1
2
3
1
D
FILTER
SAMPLING TIME MIN
PRESSURE DROP IN HG
STATIC PRESSURE IN H20
PARTICLE DENSITY G/CC
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE IN HG
GAS MOL WT
GAS TEMPERATURE DEG F
GAS VISCOSITY POISE
GAS DENSITY G/CC
WT OF MATERIAL DPC MG/ACF
2.820 H5.70
0.519 1.7<+ 8.m
0.010 1.00 0.16
0.061 0.66 0.99
0.275 0.30 t*.f6
0.020 o.m 0.32
1.000 16.21
0.5
5. HO
-0.20
3.00
26.20
28.5
151.0
0.00019
0.00091
WT PCNT
59. 9H
11.03
0.21
1.30
5.8H
O.H3
21.25
CUM WT PCNT
100.00
HO. 06
29,03
28.82
27.52
21.68
21.25
-------
tn
Table 2-49. CASCADE IMPACTOR PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FOR RUN C-15 (Metric)
INPUT VARIABLE UNITS INPUT DATA
STAGE
CYCLONE
1
2
3
H
5
FILTER
SAMPLING TIME MIN
PRESSURE DKOP CM HG
STATIC PRESSURE CM H20
PARTICLE DENSITY G/CC
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE CM HG
GAS MOL WT
GAS TEMPERATURE DEG C
GAS VISCOSITY POISE
GAS DENSITY G/CC
WT OF MATERIAL DPC MG/ACM
2.200 1.01
0.66«* 1.7<* 0.31
0.122 1.00 0.06
0.075 0.66 0.03
0.255 0.30 0.12
0.032 O.m 0.01
o.^oo o.ie
0.5
13.72
-0.51
3.00
66.55
28.5
63.3
0.00019
0.00091
WT PCNT
58.70
17.72
3.26
2.00
6. BO
0.85
10.67
CUM WT PCNT
100.00
•*1.30
23.59
20.33
18.33
11.53
10.67
-------
en
Table 2-50. CASCADE IMPACTOR PAKTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FOR RUN C-15 (English)
INPUT VARIABLE UNITS INPUT DATA
SAMPLING TIME
PRESSURE DROP
STATIC PRESSURE
PARTICLE DENSITY
MIN
IN HG
IN H20
G/CC
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE IN HG
STATE
CYCLONE
1
2
3
1
5
FILTER
GAS MOL WT
GAS TEMPERATURE
GAS VISCOSITY
GAS DENSITY
WT OF MATERIAL
2.200
0.664
0.122
0.075
0.255
0.032
0.400
DEG F
POISE
G/CC
UPC MG/ACF
35.78
1.74 10.80
1.00 1.98
0.66 1.22
0.30 ^.15
0.14 0.52
6.51
0.5
5.40
-0.20
3.00
26.20
28.5
146.0
0.00019
0.00091
WT PCNT
58.70
17.72
3.26
2.00
6.80
0.85
10.67
CUM WT PCNT
100.00
41.30
23.59
20.33
18.33
11.53
10.67
-------
Table 2-51. ARSENIC ANALYSIS RESULTS FOR PROCESS SAMPLES
Sample Location
Reverberator Slag
Wedge Roaster Calcine
24-Hour Matte
Converter Slag
Composite Roaster
Charge
R and R Cohrell Dust
Converter Cohrell Dust
R and R Spray Dust
Zn Slag #1 from Zn
Furnace #3 Converter
Zn Slag #2 from Zn
Furnace #3 Converter
Date
6-26-77
6-27-77
6-28-77
6-26-77
6-27-77
6-28-77
6-21-77
6-22-77
6-23-77
6-24-77
6-26-77
6-27-77
6-28-77
6-21-77
6-22-77
6-23-77
6-24-77
6-26-77
6-27-77
6-28-77
6-21-77
6-24-77
6-26-77
6-27-77
6-28-77
6-28-77
6-28-77
% Arsenic
0.069
0.045
0.059
0.228
0.267
0.282
0.012
0.012
0.021
0.024
0.0083
0.012
0.0088
0.0058
0.0091
0.0045
0.0034
0.0036
0.021
0.0038
0.17
0.45
0.70
0.60
7.2
9.4
2.4
0.0061
0.0057
56
-------
SECTION 3
DESCRIPTION OF THE PROCESS
(to be supplied by EPA)
57
-------
SECTION 4
LOCATION OF SAMPLING POINTS
There are two distinct control systems in the copper smelting
facility. The first controls the effluent from the converter
line, and the second controls the effluent from the multi-hearth
roasters and the reverberatory furnace. The effluent of the
converter line first passes through an induced draft fan, a
spray chamber, an electrostatic precipitator, and finally through
a sulfuric acid plant. The gases from the multi-hearth roasters
are joined by the gases from the reverberatory furnace, pass
through a spray chamber, are then cleaned in an electrostatic
precipitator, and then are directed to the base of the main stack
where they.are emitted to the atmosphere. The first system we
will discuss is the effluent of the converter line.
EFFLUENT OF THE CONVERTOR LINE
Point D Effluent of Convertors
Gases are collected from the convertors in a system of duct work
and directed out of the building, in two ducts, to the plenum
chamber inlet of an induced draft (I.D.) fan. The outlet of
this fan is sampling point D. The gases leave the fan through a
transition duct and into an expansion joint approximately 4-foot
(1.22 m) long. The gas then passes through a horizontal duct
that is 75 inches (190.5 cm) inside diameter and 16 ft. (4.88 m)
long and into the inlet of the spray chamber. This section of
line, including the expansion joint, constituted a 20 foot
59
-------
(6.10 m) straight length of duct work and was selected as site D,
inlet to the converter line control device.
Two 4 inch (10.2 cm) diameter pipe ports were located 4 foot
(1.22 m) from the spray chamber and 16 ft. (4.88 m) from the out-
let of the fan, giving 0.64 diameters downstream and 2.56 diame-
ters upstream from the ports. The ports were located on the top
and side of the horizontal duct 90° apart. A 44 point total
traverse was required, however, the first and last points on each
22 point traverse were less than 1 inch (2.54 cm) from the duct
wall. A 48 point total traverse was used and the first and last
points were dropped from each 24 point single traverse.
It was discovered on the initial velocity traverse that the bot-
tom of the duct had an accumulation of material in it. Only the
first 13 points of the vertical traverse were used to sample the
duct. All 22 points of the horizontal traverse were used. A
sketch of this location is shown in Figure 4-1.
Point E
Sampling point E is the outlet of the sulfuric acid plant. It is
a vertical stack with an atmospheric outlet. There is a straight
section of stack from the last disturbance (a tee section) to the
outlet of about 35 to 40 ft. (10.67 to 12.19 m) and the inside
diameter of the stack is 66 inches (167.6 cm). The ports were
located approximately 12 feet (3.66 m) from the disturbance giv-
ing at least 2 diameters from the disturbance to the ports and
4 or 5 diameters from the ports to the outlet. The ports were
4 inch (10.16 cm) flanged pipe and were located 90° from each
other on the circumference of the stack. A 48 point total tra-
verse was laid out, however, the first and last points of each
single traverse were nearer than 1 inch (2.54 cm) from the stack
wall and were not used. A 44 point total traverse was used.
60
-------
SUPPORT BEAMS
SUPPORT HANGERS
EXPANSION
JOINT
INLETS
Figure 4-1. Sampling location D
-------
EFFLUENT OF THE ROASTER AND REVERBERATORY FURNACES
Point C - Effluent of the Roasters
Sampling point C is the effluent of the multi-hearth roasters.
The outlets of the roasters are accumulated in a system of duct
work and directed to a large rectangular downtake flue at the
top of the roaster building. This downtake, constructed of
brick, runs diagonally down the side of the roaster building at
approximately a 45° angle and joins the horizontal flue that
takes the gases to the cleaning system. This downtake is sam-
pling point C. Four 4 inch (10.16 cm) pipe sampling ports were
installed in a horizontal line across the downtake at the second
level of the building on both the inside and outside of the duct
and scaffolding was erected on the outside for access. Since •
the duct was approximately 14.5 feet (4.42 m) square inside, the
ports were in the range of 2.21 to 2.75 equivalent diameters from
the nearest upstream disturbance and 0.55 to 2.07 equivalent di-
ameters from the nearest downstream disturbance. A 40 point
total traverse was laid out to sample this duct. This would have
consisted of 5 traverse points per port. The ports on both the
inside and outside of the duct nearest the bottom was found to be
under an accumulation of dust and therefore were not sampled.
This left a 30 point traverse. A sketch of this location is
shown in Figure 4-2.
Point B - Effluent of the Reverberatory Furnaces
The gases leaving the reverberatory furnace first pass through a
waste heat recovery boiler and then through two I.D. fans. The
outlets of these fans are sampling point B. The two rectangular
ducts from the fans, designated South (SB) and North (NB), are
26 feet (7.92 m) long, 8 feet (2.44 m) tall and 6 feet (1.83 m)
wide giving an equivalent diameter of 6.857 feet (2.09 m) . The
ducts are about 12 feet (3.66 m) apart and both empty into the
62
-------
CLEAN OUT
TRENCH
SUPPORT
BEAM
2ND FLOOR
1ST FLOOR
GROUND FLOOR
VIEW FROM INSIDE BUILDING
Figure 4-2. Sampling location C
63
-------
long horizontal flue that already contains the gases from the
roaster process. Six 4 inch (10.16 cm) pipe ports were located
on each of the ducts on the 8 foot (2.44 m) wall facing each
other and were offset 1 foot (.30 m) from each other along the
length to facilitate probe handling during simultaneous sampling.
The South duct ports were located 15.5 ft. (4.72 m) from the fan
outlet and 10.5 ft (3.20 m) from the flue giving 2.26 diameters
upstream and 1.53 diameters downstream of unobstructed duct. The
North duct ports were located 14.5 ft. (4.42 m) from the fan and
11.5 ft. (3.51 m) from the flue giving 2.11 diameters upstream
and 1.68 diameters downstream of unobstructed duct. Each port
was sampled using 4 traverse point locations so that a 24 point
overall traverse was obtained on each duct. A sketch of this lo-
cation is shown in Figure 4-3.
POINT A - OUTLET OF THE ESP
Sampling point A is a large balloon flue that connects the ESP to
the base of the main stack. The flue exits the ESP building and
turns right about 30°. It then runs for a straight length of
about 68 ft. (20.73 m) where another bend occurs. From this
point it continues to the main stack. The sampling points are
located approximately 48 ft. (14.63 m) from the first bend and
approximately 20 ft. from the second.
There are no guidelines for calculating an equivalent diameter
for a balloon shaped flue. The cross section of the flue has a
semicircular top of 6 ft. (1.83 m) radius, below this is a rec-
tangular section 12 ft. (3.66 m) wide by 7.66 ft. (2.33 m) tall,
and the bottom is a V shaped triangle with a 12 ft. (3.66 m) top
and a depth of about 9 ft. (2.74 m). This gives a total area of
approximately 200 ft2 (18.58 m2). An equivalent circular duct
would have a diameter of about 16 ft. (4.88 m). Using 16 ft.
(4.88 m) as an equivalent diameter the ports are located 3 diame-
ters from the nearest upstream bend and 1.25 diameters from the
64
-------
FAN
FAN
.26'
-14.5'
DAMPER
GRATING
DAMPER
LADDER
1'
6'
STAIRS
PORT LOCATIONS
SHOWN
TOP VIEW
LADDER
D
n
i — i
LJ
o
o
o
I
Dt
\
INSIDEVIEW
Figure 4-3. Sampling location B
65
-------
nearest downstream bend. This would normally require about 40
points to traverse. Five 3 inch (7.62 cm) ports were located on
the top of the duct and were designated A through E across the
duct. Due to the shape of the duct, various numbers of points
were used on each port.
Ports A and E were sampled using 7 points each, ports B and D
with 11 points each and port C with 15 points. This gave a total
traverse of 51 points. At each of the topmost points of each
port traverse, no flow was detected so the second point of each
traverse was sampled twice as long. This left a 46 point total
traverse with the 5 uppermost points being sampled at double the
time of the others. A sketch of this location is shown in
Figure 4-4.
66
-------
SAMPLING
BUILDING
3" PIPE PORTS w/CAPS
EXISTING
Figure 4-4. Sampling point A
67
-------
SECTION 5
SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
SAMPLING PROCEDURES
Particulate Sampling - Inlets SB, NB, and C and Outlet A
These inlets and outlets to the control device were sampled gen-
erally in accordance with Federal Register methods using the
basic Method 5 sampling train and the accepted procedures for
traversing and cleanup. There were some exceptions and modifica-
tions used, however, to facilitate the project. These exceptions
are listed below:
1. At locations SB and NB an 11 ft. (3.35 m) probe
was used that had a stainless steel heated sam-
t
pie liner rather than the glass liner normally
used. This was due to the high temperature ex-
pected at this location of as high as 1000°F
(538°C). At location C a glass lined probe was
used. At location A, the 12 ft. (3.66 m) glass
lined, heated probe that was used was too short
to reach the lower points so an 8 ft. (2.44 m)
extension was fabricated of Teflon® tubing and
placed between the probe tip and probe. An ex-
tension was made for the pitot tube and attached
to the rear of the tube and the stainless shaft
of the tubing was used to position and hold the
probe tip steady.
69
-------
2. At all of these locations a 10 ft. (3.05 m) long
heated Teflon^ lined flexible probe line was used
to connect the probe to the sample box.
3. At all locations integrated gas samples were col-
lected using the conventional method in Tedlar
bags. Analysis of these samples was performed
using the Fyrite technique rather than the Orsat
method. Since there was no CO expected to be
present in the stack gases and CO, if it were
present, is the same molecular weight as N2; the
percentages of ©2 and C02 were determined, and
the remainder assumed to be N2. S02 was known to
be present in the gas streams, however, it was
ignored for molecular weight calculations.
4. At locations NB, SB, and C the required number of
sampling traverse points were not used. Since
these locations are inlets to control devices, and
the data gathered there are to be used only for
determining uncontrolled emission estimates and
control device efficiencies; it was decided that
the lesser number of points was sufficient.
Arsenic Sampling Locations - A, SB, NB, C, D, and E
With the exception of the probe arrangement, all locations used
a modification of the Method 5 particulate sampling system. It
consisted of a heated cyclone and filter, 3 modified Smith-
Greenburg impingers each containing 100 ml of 10% H202 solution,
a standard Smith-Greenburg impinger with 100 ml of 0.1 N NaOH
solution, an additional 3 inch Method 5 type filter, another
standard Smith-Greenburg impinger with 100 ml of 0.1 N NaOH so-
lution and a final modified Smith-Greenburg impinger containing
70
-------
200 grams of silica gel. The probe, flex line, cyclone and fil-
ter were all operated above the dew point of the stack gas and
generally above 225°F (107°C). The impingers were all kept in a
water/ice bath.
Cleanup of this train entailed several sections and generally re-
sulted in obtaining six separate fractions from the train. These
fractions are listed below:
F-l - filter and collected particulate.
F-2 - probe, cyclone and front half filter holder wash-
ings, rinsed once with distilled water and once
with 0.1 N NaOH. The probe and flex line was
rinsed twice with distilled water and brushed,
and twice with 0.1 N NaOH and brushed.
F-3 - contents of first three impingers. A distilled
water rinse, and an 0.1 N NaOH rinse of the first
three impingers.
F-4 - the contents of the fourth impinger. A distilled
water rinse, and an 0.1 N NaOH rinse of this im-
pinger. Also, the front half of the secondary
filter holder was washed with distilled water and
0.1 N NaOH into this container.
F-5 - the secondary filter located between the 4th and
5th impinger.
F-6 - the contents of the fifth impinger and distilled
water and 0.1 N NaOH rinsing of this impinger,
and the back half wash of the secondary filter
holder with distilled water and 0.1 N NaOH.
71
-------
The entire train prior to assembly was rinsed thoroughly with
distilled water and the distilled water discarded. The silica
gel was removed from the final impinger, its weight determined
and the silica gel discarded.
The probe arrangement at locations A, SB, NB, and C for the ar-
senic sampling was the same as described in the particulate sam-
pling section. Sampling location D also used a heated stainless
steel lined probe and Teflon lined flexible hose. The probe ar-
rangement at location E, however, was a standard Method 5 glass
lined probe connected directly into the filter oven. Also for
the last 3 runs at location E, due to a shortage of glass filter
holders, the secondary filter was eliminated. It was assumed
that at this location the arsenic loadings would be low and the
final filter would not be necessary.
CALCULATIONS
The standard EPA Method 5 computer program used at MRC has no
provision for calculation when a gaseous material other than
water is removed in the impinger train. When a material such as
SC>2 exists in the gas stream at the concentrations encountered
in this project, and its removal is not accounted for, a sizable
error is introduced. To reduce the effect of this error, the
amount of S02 that was in the stack gases was added to the mea-
sured meter volume. In this case, the meter volume was increased
by the volume of S02 as if it had not been removed. The follow-
ing calculation was used to compute an assumed meter volume for
the arsenic runs:
meter volume = assuined meter volume
1 - fraction of S02
The S02 levels were assumed from plant information. They are as
follows:
72
-------
Location A - 0%
Location SB - 1.5%
Location NB - 1.5%
Location C - 2%
Location D - 6%
Location E - 0%
Since H202 (which removes S02 from the gas stream) was used for
arsenic trains only, this calculation does not apply to particu-
late runs.
PARTICLE SIZING
The particle sizing runs performed at the inlet to the control
device were done using a Brink® BMS-11 sampler. The sampler was
operated according to the accompanying manual.
Sampling was conducted at various points in both ducts. The
points sampled were selected because of their convenience and be-
cause the velocity at these points was similar to the average
velocity of the duct. The flow rate through the sampler was de-
termined with the use of the preliminary velocity traverse data
and the various calibration curves provided with the instrument.
The velocity at the sampling point was determined and the re-
quired probe tip nozzle selected to match the velocity and, stay
within the volumetric flow rate requirements of the impactor
while maintaining isokinetic conditions at the sampling point.
With the flow rate determined, the required pressure drop across
the impactor was selected from the calibration curve. This pres-
sure drop value was then corrected for actual temperature and
pressure conditions. The probe tip was placed at the sampling
point and the run conducted.
73
-------
The pressure drop across the particle sizer resulted in a calcu-
lated flow rate through the impactor and, therefore, the desired
particle size distribution could be calculated from mass data of
each stage. The mass collected on each stage was determined us-
ing a Kahn electro-balance in the field.
The impactor train consisted of a probe tip, a 48 inch stainless
steel probe, a cyclone, the impactor, a final packed bed filter,
a water knockout flask, and finally a vacuum pump.
ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
Particulate
Analysis of particulate samples were performed using the method
outlined in the Federal Register, Method 5 "Determination of
Particulate Emissions for Stationary Sources". This method pro-
vides for determination of the mass of particulate matter col-
lected in the probe, cyclone, and filter system of the Method 5
train. It does not, however, provide for determination of con-
densable particulate collected in the impinger section of the
train. These loadings were determined using the methods out-
lined in "Specifications for Incinerator Testing at Federal
Facilities", PHS, NCAPC. 1967.
Arsenic
Arsenic analysis was performed by separating the liquid portion
of the fractions from the solid portion and performing Atomic
Adsorption Spectroscopy (AAS) analysis directly on the dissolved
arsenic in the liquid phases. The remaining solid fractions
were digested and also analyzed by AAS. A complete description
of the analytical procedures is presented in Appendix F.
74
-------
ERRATfcSHEET
FOR
Report on Particulate and Arsenic
Emission Measurements from a Copper Smelter
at the ASARCO Smelter in
El Paso, Texas
EPA Contract 68-02-1404
Work Assignment No. 35
June 20-30, 1977
Prepared by:
Monsanto Research Corporation
Dayton Laboratory
1515 Nicholas Road
Dayton, Ohio 45407
-------
The changes that follow pertain, to the tests performed for participate
and arsenic at the. Roaster and Reverberatory Cottrell outlet designated in
the report as Site A istack base). The area .of the duct was incorrectly
calculated at 211 Ft. where in reality it was 151 Ft. . Original emission
rates in this report are erroneously high. For quick reference, the end
of the errata sheet contains sampling summary sheets giving correct emission
factors for Site A.
-------
CHANGES
Page 6, Table 2-1 (Metric)
o
Change stack gas volumetric flow rate - Mm /min-
- A.-T ' ' A-2 A-3
5693 to-4069
5944 to 4249
6307 to 4508
Change stack gas volumetric flow rate - Am /min :
A-l A-2 A-3
8988 to 6425 9398'to 6718 9478 to 6775
Change arsenic-probe, cyclone and filter catch (Kg/hr)
- A£L A-2" A-3 '•
.727 to .520 2.496 to 1.785 1.252 to .895
Change arsenic - total catch (Kg/hr)
A-l A-2 A-3
1.543 to 1.103 3.357 to'2.40 1.539 to 1.100
Page 7, Table 2-2 (English)
Change stack volumetric flow rate - dscfm
•• A-l A-2
201030 to 143696 209891 to 150030
Change stack volumetric flow rate - acfmc
AI! A-2
317387 to 226868 331839 to 237199
Change arsenic-probe cyclone and filter catch (Ib/hr)-'
A-l A-2 A-3
1.603 to 1.146 5.503 to 3.934 2.761 to 1.974
Change arsenic-total catch (Ib/hr)
A-1 A-2 A-3
3.401 to 2.43 7.400 to 5.29 3.393 to 2.425
A-3
222719 to 159200
A-3
334661 to 239216
-------
Page 18, Table 2-13 (Metric)
Change stack- volumetric flow rate - Nm/mln
A-4 A-5
6101 to 4361 6606 to 4722
.Change ,stack volumetric flow rate - Am3/minb
A-5
«
10118 to 7232 10724 to 7666
Change parti culate-probe, cyclone and filter catch (Kg/hr)
•A-4 A-5
.40.73 to 29.11 33.70 to 24.09
Change particulate-total catch (Kg/hr)
A-4 • .A-5
51.78 to 37.01 43.30 to 30.95
Page 19, Table .2-14- (English)
Change stack volumetric flow rate - dscfm
A-5
215414 to 153978 233278 to 166747
Change stack volumetric flow rate - Acfmc
A-4 A-5
357285 to 255387 378662 to 270668
Change particulate-probe, cyclone and filter catch (Ib/hr)
A-4 A-5
89.79 to 64.18 74.28 to 53.10
Change particulate-total catch (Ib/hr)
A-4 A-5
114.4 to 81.8 95.47 to 68.24
-------
Page 64, Paragraph 3
Change paragraph 3 to read as follows:
There are no guidelines for calculating an'equivalent diameter
for a balloon shaped flue. The cross section of the flue has a semicircular
top of 5 foot (1.52m) radius, below this is a rectangular section 10 ft.
(3.05m) wide by 6.73 ft (2.05m) tall and the bottom is a V-shaped triangle with
a 10' I3.05rrt) top and depth of.8.88 ft (2.71m). This gives a total area of
approximately 151 ft (14.03m ). An equivalent circular duct would have
a diameter of.about 13.87 ft. (4.23 m). Using 13.87 ft. (4.23m) as an
equivalent diameter, the ports are located 3.46 diameters from the neareat
upstream bend and 1.44 diameters from the nearest downstream bend.. This
would normally require about 40 points to traverse. Five 3-inch (7.62 cm)
ports were located on the top of the duct and were designated A through E
across the duct. Due to the shape of the duct, various numbers of points were
used on each port. . -.
Page 67, Figure 4-4, Cross section view
• Change dimensions on balloon flue (see attached drawing):
from 6 ft to 5 ft (semicircular top)
from 7 ft to 6'8 3/4" (rectangular cross section)
from 9 ft to 8' 10 9/16" (bottom triangle)
Appendix A, 1st page, Site A, Runs A1-A5, Metric Units
Replace first and second pages of Appendix A with attached pages.
First two pages of Appendix A gives complete arsenic and particulate -
results for Site A (English and Metric units) for runs A-l through A-5.
Runs Al, A2 and A3 are arsenic runs. A4 to A5 are particulate runs.
-------
6 DECEMBER 1978
ASARCt) - EL PASO
PARTICULATE SAMPLING
ABBR
TT
PH
OELH
VM
TM
VMSTD
VW
VWG
PCNTM
MO
C02
02
N2
MWD
MW
DELP
CP
TS
PM
PS
vs
OS
AS
OS
OA
DM
PCTI
MF
MT
DESCRIPTION (68 DEG F)
DURATION OF RUN
RAROMETRIC PRESSURE
AVG ORIFICE PRESS DROP
VOL DRY GAS(METER CON)
AVG GAS METER TEMP
VOL DRY GAS (STD COND)
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED
VOL H20 VAPOR (STD CON)
PERCNT MOISTURE BY VOL
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PERCENT C02
PERCENT 02
PERCENT N2
MOL WT OF DRY GAS
MOL WT OF STACK GAS
AVG STACK VELOCITY HEAD
PITOT COEFFICIENT
STACK TEMPERATURE
STACK PRESSURE(STATIC)
STACK PRESSURE (ABS)
AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY
STACK DIAMETER
STACK AREA
STACK FLOW RT(DRY STD)
STACK FLOW RT(ACTUAL)
PROBE TIP DIAMETER
PERCENT ISOKINETIC
PARTICULATE (FRONT)
PARTICULATE (TOTAL)
UNITS
MINUTES
IN HG
IN H20
DCF
DEG F
DSCF
ML
SCF
IN H20
DEG F
IN H20
IN HG
FPM
INCHES
SO IN
DSCFM
ACFM
INCHES ;
MG
MG
A-l
153.0
26.02
O.llfl
59.129
110.2
17.68
71,0
3.185
6.81
0.932
3.5
19.0
' 77.5
29.3
28,5
0.177
0.763
216.
-1.20
25.93
1503.
166.39
21744
143696
226868
0.215
100.1
2. 88*
6.11
A-2
153.0
25.91
0.180
62.129
111.1
19.79
69.0
3,250
6.13
0.939
3.5
19.0
77.5
29.3
28.6
0,197
0.763
219.
-1.20
25.82
1571.
166.39'
21744
150030
237199
0.215
100.1
9.89
13.30
A-3
'iss'.'d
26.02
0.186
63.166
118.6
50.21
15,0
0.706
1.39
0.906
0.0
20.8
79.2
28.8
28.7
0.199
0.763
221.
-1.20
25.93
1585*
166. 391
21744
159200
239216
0.215
95.1
1.72
5.00
^ A-1
•' »l ' *
. '* • '
f '*V 5*5,0
' 26,00
0,555
65.778
108.0
53.23
131*8
6.319
10.66
0.693
1.3
19.0
79.7
29*0
27.8
0.223
0.763
220.
-1.20
25.91
1692.
'16.6.39.
-.21744
153978
'255387
0.215
101.6
168.10
214.10
A-5 '
I •
. « t
153.0
26.00
0.581
66.165
98.0
51.50
110.0
5.181
8,68
0.913
2.0
20.0
78.0
29.1
28.2
0.252
0.763
220.
-1.20
25.91
1793.
166.39
. 21744
166747
270668
0.215
98.9
131.50
169.00
-------
6 OECEMHER 1970
ASARCO - EL PASO
PARTICIPATE SAMPLING
ADOR
DESCRIPTION 120 DEG C) UNITS
A-l
A-2
A-1
A-5
TT
rn
HFLII
VM
TM
VMSTO
VW
VWG
PCNTM
MO
C02
02
N2
MWD
MW
OELP
CP
TS
PM
PS
vs
OS
AS
OS
OA
DM
f r T T
DURATION OF RUN
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
AVG ORIFICE PRESS DROP
VOL DRY GASCMETER CONI
t
AVG GAS METER TEMP
VOL DRY GAS tSTD CONDI
TOTAL H20 COLLECTED
VOL H20 VAPORCSTO CONI
PERCNT MOISTURE OY VOL
MOLE FRACTION DRY GAS
PERCENT C02
PERCENT 02
PERCENT N2
MOL WT OF DRY GAS
MOL WT OF STACK GAS
AVG STACK VELOCITY HEAD
PITOT COEFFICIENT
STACK TEMPERATURE
STACK PRESSURECSTATICI
STACK PRESSURE CABSI
AVG STACK GAS VELOCITY
STACK DIAMETER
STACK AREA
STACK FLOW RTCORY STDI
STACK FLOW RTCACTUAL)
PROfiE TIP DIAMETER
prrnrrMT isoKiwrric
MINUTES
CM HG
CM H20
DCM
OEG C
DNCM
ML
NCM
CM H20
DEG C
CM H20
CM HG
MPM
CM
SO CM
DNCMPM
ACMPM
CM
153.0
66.09
1.061
1.675
13.1
1.35
71.0
0.099
6,01
0.932
3.5
19.0
77.5
29.3
20.5
0.119
0*763
102.
-3.05
65.07
150.
'422.6
•140265
4069
6425
0.622
1 0 0 „ '»
153.0
65.01
1.220
1.759
11.1
1.11
69.0
0.092
6.13
0.939
3.5
19.0
77.5
29.3
20.6
0.501
0.763 ,
101.
-3.05
65.59
179.
422;6 •
140265
4249
6718
0.622
1 0 0 . '1
153.0
66.09
1.235
1.709
10.1
1.12
15.0
0.020
1.39
0.906
0.0
20. a
79.2
20, a
20.7
0.506 '
0.763
105.
-3.05
65.07
103.
422.6 .
J 140265
4508
6775 •
0.622
9V «|
153,0
66,01
1.100
1.063
12.2
1.51
131,0
0,100
10,66
0,093
1.3
19.0
7 9.. 7
29.0
27.0
0.567
0.763
105.
-3.05
65.02
516.
' 422.6.
-140265
4361
7232-
0.622
lOMnft
153.0
66.01
lAoi
1.071
.36.7
1.51
noi.o
0.117
0.60
0.913
2.0
20.0
7fl.O
29.1
20.2
0.639
0.763
105.
-3.05
65.02
5«6.
422.6
140265
4722
7666
0.622
n n , 9
-------
L6Ution £:•/•'
Sailed source \$'i -f« A /x*/? Cc f^e // ^Ikt^JkiiV WMeA io& . Y/frJWc.)
@ © ' © 0 e © ' ° ' 7 ' p>
' *"« °*tG ' Np - Pm Pb ' Vm Tm ' Vm f, ' Vw . V- *« 'Xd
F ....... std . pas .
/) -V c -}-7 -77 jf o >4*° ^5T. 9/
./r-'t C--^-77 5-0 ,4?<£ ^6,PZ
•
Run COp 02 N« CO MWj MW Pgt
.4 -/ ^-V /9 77.5 0,o >»
Absolute
Pilot Tobe Coefficient
StacV Cas Velocity at Stick
Condition;,
fps
Averag; Stack Tcr.peraturc
•r
Net Tire of Test, Hln.
V Total li.O Collected In Injln-
1/2 5>.Ts and Silica Ccl, »l
Dry il.ind.ird Cubic feel.
rolccular Vcljht of Stack
Cas. Vet Oasis
Sampling Nozzle Arr.;:,
» I
In. llj.
-------
- i t .'"-'••! ": •"''•"
.- ;-.b,i. ^.,; i. , .•-;..
V^iimH--
FINAL SUMMARY
t OCA Tio' IV _fJLfiu-*
. P L A N T __fb4^S&i_
I
;:> AM PL ELD SOURCE, .?: A> 4. (H a C^i~f^o// (S%.^ $«s*) /%tV«r/ /^ {4r**. ' -77
DIA
AREA
1-5 /
1.5 /
I5/
ACFM
-X.^Q ';i9
^I7^yy
JJ')27$
DSCFM
;v ^ ire
/V*7 V
.' I
Gr/DSCFI
c-.-rO'
. OC J|
. / !•. i 5
(VI^/M5
i. 1
;» ^
* . 3
-tt/Hr.
I.I
3.9
d.o
Kg/Mr.
, 5^.
//#
,9
Gr./DSCF
^7_7_
K9/«r.
Gr,/D5CF
-\
51 3
a.v
44
45
46
52
-------
PI ANT A ^./J^eo
SAMPLED SOURCL
FINAL SUM/MARY SHEIELT
. ' ' 'i : ',
LOCATION
PUN
/) - 'A
4 5
DATE.
.6 -33 ?->
/•-V-77
DIA
ARtA
\S'i
\s '
ACFM
»2.55VA4
^70.2 (PO
DSCFM
K3V.TC.
/65"?^o
37 38
£!:;. CATCH
PROBE.
CYCLONE
FILTER
TOTAL
BACK
37>JT
TOTAL
JltL.
/49.0
TOTAL.-.-___.
[
If
RUIV
:! -//
? -;'
Gr./DSCF
, O<\%<}{
: C37 1
M.q/M
\\\.(D
4*/HrJ
£^, /
53.0
K^/Mr.
«^1./
*
-------
;> 1 ., ., i. ) v . I • ' i'> t s ( r14 i *, • „ 7~"
• i.'K ' ' I v!\ » ///$ '{/>/)•/,• 7~t? f-$r I
;•':.. -"P led source S.'ft X - ft '6. (R c'eT-/»
rV
V .5ft jfc.ov.
f. U 7; .£c- .?>£M JC.eo
'
1
© @©@ 23" ^4 @
Rim C02 02 N2 CO MWd MW Pst
. i 1 • > i") /V.'/ .l$,?7 JL9-t?C -/,2.
:.... i-o ?"?7y 1
66, /65
#•
24, (2?)
p r
s V
A^*;/ .7^.7
>^.?/ ,7O
UfcAtion Jt 6 /;.' /^?xo
i ' j * • , • -i '
, *
(§)
/ 0 T ""
~i/AKS X ('s + 460) Vs
//, ^.-^0 «^cP, O
/p/3f^, «A9,y3
1 7 . 64 * V (p t pm \ : ICO x Vw H Totll No. of Sapling Point VW Mf?$ ^ Vlpar Co»«t«d
TJ.6; » ii . fl". p ' '
":td n* "ltd * Vf P Average Orifice Prctturo
9 Drop, In. 11^0
v .0471 V^ Mj-100-.fJJ *~ P. Baroiro trie Pressure, In. «s
>00 " Absolute
V Volunc of Dry Gas it f!ctf f
i - ('C.I x *-4 )t (10 x 3Z ) * (ICO « tH ) x 20 'CondSlloni, DCF
i Tfl Ave:*96
r
,' • "V x ' H. » \i (1 - H )
.',**.. VM Volume
ltd oscr
Meter Tempcriturt,
jf Dry G« it STP,
X K X Kolstwrc by Volunvj
H^ Hole Friction of Dry Cat
. X C02 Volui* 1 Dry
X 6j Volume X Dry '" *•%
,'| X Cd Volune X Dry
X |la . Vo1u« X Dry
M/4 Nolcculir K'eljht of Stick G«t, ^~
. ? « ? ' Dry 0»lt (^
b ~ 'J V Tolilll.O Collected tn lojln- V-
p . -| 1/Z jor* and Stiles Gel, H
>M f'olccubr Veljhl of StacV
IT>.>\ /#r
• f *
1 1> 17 i r.
\/ , f/M V
\as " "d
r^/3 : /d?. d:cr , Pyjt^
^T-** ^/V1 &) / 7 j
P f^L o • v 'j , y/j4-
•
<&' © © ;';
Ts Tfc On " , %I
; • '» ' f " •
2*2.0 /J"l • i*Jf 99 &
: ' .
• • i fc
i i " •
P.t StJtlc Pressure of Stack .
" Gas. In. HI
t1. Stick Gat Prr-.iurc, tn. M«
*' Absolute
C Pilot Tube C-efflHcr.t
V, Stae* Gas Velocity it Stack
Condition;.
fps
Tf A»era9C Stack Tempera ti/rt
Tr Ket Tire of Test. Kin.
J Ah Sanp.11 no Nozzle Arr:,:,
5 t IVreonl I'.oVlrotic
-------
CROSS .SECTION
BALLOON FLUE
R ( R COTTRELL OUTLET
ASARCO SMEITTR
£L PASO, TEXAS
------- |