P/EPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards
Research Triangle Park NC 27711
EMB Report 80-BYC-11
August 1981
Air
Benzene Fugitive Leaks
Coke Oven By-Product Plants
Emission Test Report
Wheeling-Pittsburgh
Steel Corporation
Monessen, Pennsylvania
-------
DCN 81-222-018-01-20 EMB Report No. 80-BYC-ll
EMISSION TEST REPORT
FUGITIVE EMISSIONS TESTING
AT THE
WHEELING-PITTSBURGH STEEL
MONESSEN PLANT
Prepared by:
D.P- Wiesenborn, J.I. Steinmetz, and G.E. Harris
RADIAN CORPORATION
8501 Mo-Pac Boulevard
Austin, Texas 78759
Prepared for:
Dan Bivins
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
ESED/EMB (MD-13)
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711
EPA Contract No. 68-02-3542
Work Assignment No. 1
ESED No. 74/4j
11 September 1981
-------
CONTENTS
Section Page
1 Introduction 1
2 Summary of Results 2
3 Process Description 6
4 Methodology 9
4.1 Screening Procedures 9
4.2 Sampling Procedures 10
4.3 Analytical Techniques 13
5 Quality Control/Quality Assurance , 14
5.1 Quality Control for Screening Procedures 14
5.2 Quality Control for Analytical and Sampling Procedures .. 16
5.2.1 Blind Standards 16
5.2.2 Accuracy Checks 17
Appendix A A-l
Appendix B B-l
-------
FIGURES
Number Page
3-1 Light oil recovery unit, Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel 7
4-1 Sampling train for baggable source of hydrocarbon
emissions 11
5-1 Mass spectrum of light oil from the separator on SP-2100/
Bentone 18
5-2 Mass spectrum of light oil from the separator on TCEP 19
5-3 Mass spectrum of liquid leak from PU-139 on TCEP 20
5-4 Mass spectrum of liquid leak from PU-139 on SP-2100/Bentone. 21
5-5 Mass spectrum of line sample from scrubber "B" on TCEP 22
5-6 Mass spectrum of line sample from scrubber "B" on SP-2100/
Bentone 23
5-7 Mass spectrum of line sample from scrubber "A" on TCEP 24
5-8 Mass spectrum of line sample from scrubber "A" on SP-2100/
Bentone 25
11
-------
TABLES
Number
2-1 OVA screening value distribution: Wheeling-Pittsburgh
Steel Monessen Plant
2-2 Summary of benzene and nonmethane hydrocarbon leak rates
Ibs/hr from sampled sources: Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel
2-3
5-1
5-2
5-3
5-4
Comparison of benzene content in emissions and in liquid
5
15
17
17
26
iii
-------
SECTION 1
INTRODUCTION
This report presents the results of testing for fugitive VOC (Volatile
Organic Compounds) and benzene emissions at the Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel plant
in Monessen, Pennsylvania. The testing was performed by Radian Corporation
on November 24 through December 5, 1980.
This work was funded and administered by the Emission Measurement Branch
of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under Contract No. 68-02-3542.
The results of this testing may be used in support of a National Emissions
Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants for benzene from coke oven by-products
recovery units in steel mills.
Potential sources of fugitive benzene emissions in the by-product unit
were screened with a portable hydrocarbon detector to estimate the frequency
of leak occurrence. The liquid and vapor benzene emission rates were measured
by collecting and analyzing samples from leaking fittings. Also, liquid
samples were obtained from process lines to provide data on the proportion of
benzene in process lines relative to the proportion of benzene in the vapor
emitted from fittings on thos-e lines.
The following sections present a summary of results, a description of the
process, configuration, the testing methodology, and QA/QC procedures. Example
calculations and a full listing of data and other supplemental information
are included in the appendices.
-------
SECTION 2
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
This section presents a summary of the fugitive emission data gathered at
the Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel plant in Monessen. All data are presented in the
form of original data sheets in Appendix B.
The plant screening results are presented in Table 2-1. This table
presents the distribution of OVA readings for each source type.
The results of the baggable sampling are presented in Table 2-2. The
mass emission ~rates are presented in pounds per day for each source in terms of
both benzene and nonmethane hydrocarbons. Mass emission rates are also pre-
sented in terms of vapor phase and liquid phase emission rate. Each source
was rescreened immediately before and after bagging. The average of these
two values is also presented in Table 2-2 for both the OVA and the TLV.
A comparison of the benzene concentration in vapor-phase and total
emissions with the benzene concentrations in the liquid lines is presented in
Table 2—3. The benzene concentration in the vapor-phase leak and the total
leak (vapor plus liquid) is expressed as a ratio of the benzene emission rate
to non-methane hydrocarbon emission rate, since bag samples are diluted with,
air.
-------
TABLE 2-1. OVA SCREENING VALUE DISTRIBUTION: WHEELING-PITTSBURGH STEEL MONESSEN PLANT
OVA
Screening
Value
0
200
>
Total
(PPMV)
to 199
to 9,999
= 10,000
Sources Screened
Flanges
#a
25
0
0
25
%b
100.0
0.0
o;o
100.0
Threaded
Fittings
#
28
0
0
28
%
100.0
0.0
0.0
100.0
Valves
#
85
0
2
87
%
97.7
0.0
2.3
100.0
Pump
Seals
#
6
2
4
12
%
50.0
16.7
33.3
100.0
Exhausters
#
4
0
0
4
%
100.0
0.0
0.0
100.0
a) // - number of sources in each category
b) % - percent of total sources screened
c) An additional 14 valves were included on the screening data sheets but were not actually
screened with the OVA because of inaccessibility
-------
TABLE 2-2. SUMMARY OF BENZENE AND NONMETHANE HYDROCARBON LEAK RATES (LBS/HR) FROM
SAMPLED SOURCES: WHEELING-PITTSBURGH STEEL MONESSEN PLANT
Sampling Source
Date ID
Block Valves 12/04/80 18
Pumps 12/04/80 139-Ib
139-0
12/05/80 98-1
139-Id
141-1
98-0
117-0
131-0
139-0d
Mean OVA
Screening
Value3
1250
50000
11000
3500
3000
325
27500
7515
5250
1500
Mean TLV
Screening
__Valu«_
530
5900
4850
3800
3850
550
10001
9601
6850
2050
Benzene Leak Rates
Vagor
0.000021
.c
.
0.054684
0.091357
0.000874
0.153253
0.037533
0.106385
0.057614
Liguid
0.000000
0.565700
0.000000
0.000000
0.563360
0.000000
0.128556
0.000000
0.162920
0.000000
Total
0.000021
.
.
0.054684
0.654717
0.000874
0.281809
0.037533
0.269305
0.057614
Nonmethane-HC Leak Rates
Va£0r
0.000135
0.142887
0.093284
0.065151
0.083309
0.000971
0.157413
0.039802
0.117251
0.074159
Liquid
0.000000
1.413000
0.000000
0.000000
1.407000
0.000000
0.164056
0.000000
0.207690
0.000000
Total
0.000135
1.555887
0.093284
0.065151
1.490309
0.000971
0.321469
0.039802
0.324941
0.074159
a) Average of before and after sampling screening values (given in Appendix B-2}
b) I denotes Inboard seal and 0 denotes outboard seal of a pump with two seals
c) This symbol denotes that no data was taken in that category
d) Sources 139-1 and 139-0 were sampled twice because of incomplete data on first set of samples
-------
TABLE 2-3. COMPARISON OF BENZENE CONTENT IN EMISSIONS AND IN LIQUID LINES:
WHEELING-PITTSBURGH STEEL MONESSEN PLANT
Line
Temp
(°F)
Press
(psig)
Wt% Benzene
in Line
Source
ID
Wt% Benzene ina
Vapor Leak
Wt% Benzene
in Total Leak
Scrubber "A" 160
Effluent
42
39.4
18
139-Id
139-0
17C
78
17C
44
78
Scrubber "B" 160 34
Effluent
Rectifier 130 20-
Bottoms
Crude Light 50 20.
Oil
a) Weieht Dercent- h^n^no in i-h
-------
SECTION 3
PROCESS DESCRIPTION
The Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Monessen plant operates with a wash oil
absorption system to recover light oil from the coke oven gas. The crude
light oil product is sent outside of the plant for refining.
During the testing period, the coke ovens were producing 560 tons per
day of coke and 8.27 MMSCFD of coke oven gas. The light oil recovery unit
was recovering 2,730 gallons per day of crude light oil.
A simplified flow diagram for the plant is shown in Figure 3-1. The
light oil recovery unit normally operates with two wash oil scrubbers in
series. During the testing period, however, only one scrubber was in
service. The other scrubber was being flushed with a cleaning oil containing
about 39 weight percent benzene.
The benzolized wash oil from the scrubber is stripped with steam to
separate the light oil from the wash oil. The light oil then goes to a recti-
fier. The rectifier splits the light oil into two fractions, and was formerly
used as one step towards refining. Currently, the rectifier overhead is
recombined with the rectifier bottoms, after the overhead is condensed and
the water is removed in the secondary separator. Condensables from the
stripper overhead go to the primary separator for water removal then are also
recombined with the crude light oil.
Fugitive emissions testing was to be performed in all areas of the
plant with at least 4 weight percent benzene. This included the scrubber
cleaning oil, the stripper overhead, condensables, and light oil product.
-------
COKE
OVEN
GAS
DE-BENZOLIZED
WASH OIL W.O.) STEAM AND
LIGHT OIL (L.O.)
CONDENSER
SCRUBBER"A"
(NOT IN SERVICE)
PU141
BENZOLIZED
WASH OIL
WATER
Numbers following the letters VA and PU are source ID numbers for
valves and pumps, respectively, from which fugitive emissions were
detected.
Numbers in parentheses are the weight percent benzene in that line.
Figure 3-1. Light Oil Recovery unit, Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel.
-------
The benzolized wash oil line and exhausters were also screened, although these
contained less than 4 percent benzene. The exhausters are upstream from light
oil recovery on the coke oven gas line, and are not shown in Figure 3—1.
-------
SECTION 4
METHODOLOGY
The fugitive emissions testing at the Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Monessen
plant included both "screening" and "bagging" operations. Screening is a generic
term covering any quick portable method of detecting fugitive emissions. Bag-
ging refers to a quantitative emission measurement achieved by enclosing the
source in a Mylar® shroud and analyzing an equilibrium flow of air through
the enclosure.
4.1 SCREENING PROCEDURES
Screening was done according to the procedures specified in EPA's Method
21, a copy of which may be found in Appendix A-2. The instrument used in per-
forming this screening was the Century Systems Organic Vapor Analyzer (OVA) Model
108. Method 21 requires the results of the screening to be recorded (as speci-
fied in the applicable regulation) only if the leak definition is met or exceed-
..d. Since this effort was more oriented to standards development than to regula-
tory monitoring, the exact screening value was recorded for all sources.
The screening methods were used to survey every accessible valve and pump,
and a portion of the valves, on lines handling at least 4 weight percent benzene.
Only one-third of the flanges were screened because of their large population.
Exhausters were also screened, although they are not in the light oil recovery
section of the plant and the coke oven gas they handle contains less than
4 weight percent benzene. Exhausters were included because they can potentially
have high emissions.
The survey was conducted on a line-by-line basis with plant flow diagrams
to ensure that no sources were missed and to group sources subject to similar
-------
process conditions. Plant personnel corroborated the identification of process
lines and supplied data that was not otherwise immediately available, such as
the composition and phase of the material in the line.
Fourteen sources were not screened due to either physical inaccessibility or
safety problems which prevented close approach, but these sources were recorded
on the data sheets to insure that a complete source inventory was obtained.
All leaking valves, pump seals, and exhauster seals were tagged with their
respective ID numbers and were subsequently bagged.
4.2 SAMPLING PROCEDURES
Bagging procedures were carried out according to methods developed in
previous refinery testing. Before and after a source was sampled, it was
again screened. This" time, however, a J.W. Bacharach "TLV Sniffer" (TLV) was
used in addition to the OVA. The OVA uses a flame ionization detector and has
a quick response time that makes it ideal for the initial screening. The
TLV uses a catalytic oxidation detector and has a slower response than the
OVA.
The leaking area of the source was completely enclosed in a shroud of
Mylar® plastic to contain any emissions. Mylar® is well suited to this func-
tion, because it does not absorb significant amounts of hydrocarbons and has
a high melting point (250°C). The enclosures were kept as small as possible,
generally less than one cubic foot in volume except for enclosures of exhauster
seals. A small enclosure provided a more effective seal, minimized the time
required to make the enclosure and reach steady-state conditions, and minimized
the condensation of heavy hydrocarbons within the enclosure.
The enclosure was connected to the sampling train shown in Figure 4-1.
The sampling train included a cold trap, a dry gas meter, and a vacuum pump.
The vacuum pump induced a flow of air, plus any fugitive emissions contained
10
-------
MAGNEHELIC
TENT
THIS LINE SHOULD
DEAS SHORT
/AS POSSIBLE
Z^\
LEAKING
VALVE
COLD TRAP
(ICE OATH)
TRAP
Hg MANOMETER
VACUUM PUMP
SMALL
DIAPHRAGM
PUMP
SAMPLE BAQ
TWO WAY VALVE
Figure 4-1. Sampling train for baggable source of Hydrocarbon
emissions.
-------
within the enclosure, through the sampling train. A magnehelic connected to
the enclosure with a short piece of latex tubing was used to ensure that a
slight, but measurable, vacuum was maintained within the enclosure. A slight
vacuum prevented fugitive emissions from leaking out of the enclosure.
The cold trap was used to condense water and heavy organics that might
otherwise condense downstream in lines and equipment. This trap consisted
of a 500 ml flask in an ice bath. No condensate was observed at the Monessen
plant; however, if an organic condensate were collected, it would be measured,
analyzed, and included in calculating the total leak rate.
Downstream from the cold trap, a dry gas meter measured the volume of
gas that passed through the sampling train. By measuring the volume of gas
during a known period of time, it was possible to calculate the dry gas
flow rate. The gas flow rate could be varied, and the maximum flow rate
achievable was about 2.5 cubic feet per minute. The temperature and pressure
of the gas were measured to allow a conversion to standard conditions.
When sufficient time had passed to allow the system to reach steady-state
(generally, 4 minutes was more than adequate for an enclosure of I cubic foot),
a Tedlar® sampling bag was filled from the discharge of the small Teflon®-lined
diaphragm pump. A second Tedlar® bag was filled with a sample of ambient air
near the enclosure. The two samples were then taken to the mobile lab on the
plant grounds for analysis.
Liquid leak rates were estimated by capturing the liquid in a watchglass
and measuring the volume collected over a known period of time. Samples of.
each liquid leak and of the liquids from process lines were taken back to the
laboratory for benzene analysis. Sample bottles were filled to the brim to
minimize any vapor overhead space that would allow the benzene in the liquid
sample to become dispersed between two phases.
12
-------
4.3 ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES
To quantify the VOC emissions from the bagged sources, the concentration
of total hydrocarbon and also that of benzene were determined using gas chroma-
tographic procedures. Primary analysis of fugitive volatile organic compounds
(VOC) was performed on a Byron 301C Total Hydrocarbon Analyzer (THC). The
THC has an upper detection limit of 20,000 ppmv. Dilutions of more concen-
trated samples were made with a 1.5 liter gas-tight syringe.
Methane calibrations were carried out daily on the THC with an 8000 ppmv
methane/air standard. Nonmethane hydrocarbon calibrations were also carried
out daily on the THC with a 713 ppmw NBS propane standard.
Analyses for benzene were performed on a Hewlett Packard 5730A Dual FID
Gas Chromatograph. Dual gas samples were introduced simultaneously onto sepa-
rate columns with a Valco 10 port Hastalloy C multiport valve installed immedi-
ately forward of the GC syringe injection ports. Peak integrations were com-
piled on two Hewlett Packard 3380A electronic integrators. Liquid samples
were analyzed by normal syringe injection techniques using benzene as an ex-
ternal standard.
The columns and conditions used for the benzene analyses are listed
below:
1/8" OD, 2 mm ID, 15 feet, 5% SP-2100/1.75% Benton 34
on 100/120 mesh Supelcoport.
1/8" OD, 2 mm ID, 15 feet, 10% TCEP on 100/120 mesh
Chromosorb P acid washed.
• Na carrier at 30 ml/min.
Isothermal at 110°C.
The instrument was calibrated daily with a 5571 ppmw benzene in air standard.
Single analyses were done simultaneously on the two different columns after
calibration.
13
-------
SECTION 5
QUALITY CONTROL/QUALITY ASSURANCE
5.1 QUALITY CONTROL FOR SCREENING PROCEDURES
The screening was done with three different instruments in use at various
times in the Monessen Plant. These included two Century Systems Organic
Vapor Analyzers (Model OVA-108) and one J. W. Bacharach Instrument Company
"TLV Sniffer". The corresponding instrument identification numbers are given
below:
Device
Type
OVA
OVA
TLV
Assigned
ID Number
2
3
4
The OVA and TLV instruments were calibrated each day they were used.
Standards of 90 ppmv and 1990 ppmv hexane in air were used to obtain a two
point calibration on the TLV; 7990 ppmv methane in air was used to calibrate
the OVA. Before a recalibration was made each day, the values obtained from
the instrument were recorded. This served two purposes:
• a check for instrument damage or malfunction, and
• a rough check of the stability of the daily- calibration.
In addition to the high (and low for TLV) standard calibrations, a
dilution probe was occasionally attached to the instrument and another read-
ing was taken. The probe was set at 10:1 dilution of the high standard con-
centration. The calibration data is: summarized in Table 5-1.
14
-------
TABLE 5-1. CALIBRATION CHECKING OF OVA AND TLV
Date
11/24/80
11/25
11/26
12/01
12/02
12/03
12/04
12/05
OVA 2 OVA 3
High Stand., pprav Dil Probe, ppmv High Stand., ppmv Dil Probe, pp.mv
5000 650
5000 750
6500
5000
5800
6200 1500
9500 1000
Low Stand, ppmv
40
90
280
60
60
TLV 4
d
High Stand, ppmv
1400
2200
1900
2400
1950
Dil Probe, ppmv
200
400
520
420
900
Footnotes:
a OVA calibration standard contained 7990 ppmv methane in air,'.
b OVA reading with dilution probe should be 800 ppmv
c TLV low calibration standard contained 90 ppmv hexane in air
d TLV high calibration standard contained 1990 ppmv hexane 'in air
e TLV reading with dilution probe should be about 200 ppmv
-------
The calibration checking results do indicate some significant drift. It
should be noted, however, that these readings are taken in the morning before
calibration and not at the close of the screening day. It is likely that most
of the calibration drift occurs due to the overnight shutdown and recharge rather
than during the days screening. The phenomenon of calibration drift over a
shutdown and re-start has been observed in other studies.
5.2 QUALITY CONTROL FOR ANALYTICAL AND SAMPLING PROCEDURES
Quality control procedures were implemented to insure accurate, consis-
tent, and unbiased analytical and sampling techniques during the project.
The procedures discussed in this section include:
• blind standards
• accuracy checks
5.2.1 BLIND STANDARDS
Standard materials were prepared and submitted to the analyst without
divulging the concentration of benzene or hexane present in order to evalute
the quality of data generated by the Byron 301C Total Hydrocarbon Analyzer
(THC) and the HP5703A Dual FID Gas Chromatograph. Blind standards were
implemented in two separate analyses. A gaseous hexane standard was used
to verify the gaseous fugitive emissions and a liquid benzene standard was
used to verify the liquid leak and liquid line samples.
A 263 ppm hexane standard was implemented to demonstrate the precision
and accuracy of the analysis of bag samples by the Byron THC. Table 5-2
lists the data from blind hexane standard analyses. The difference between
the prepared and measured concentration is shown as the percent difference.
The percent difference is calculated as follows:
% Diff = (Prepared - Measured Concentration) X 100/Prepared Concentration
The % Difference mean and standard deviation are -2.16% and 7.76% respectively,
indicating no significant bias in the THC analysis.
16
-------
TABLE 5-2. BLIND STANDARDS DATA LISTING
Instr.
THC
THC
THC
THC
Date
12/02/80
12/02/80
12/02/80
12/02/80
Gas Type
Hexane
Hexane
Hexane
Hexane
Prepared
263.0
263.0
263.0
263.0
Measured
284.3
241.9
272.7
293.0
Diff.
-21.3
21.1
-9.7
-30.0.
Percent
Diff
-8.099
8.023
-3.688
-11.407
Average: -2.16%
Standard Deviation: 7.76%
A 63.1% benzene liquid standard was used to verify the accuracy of the
gas chromatographic analysis of liquid leaks and line samples. Table .5-3
indicates that the amount of benzene found was 1.9% less than the concentration
at which it was prepared, indicating no significant bias in the analysis.
TABLE 5-3. LIQUID BLIND STANDARD ANALYSIS RESULTS
Standard I.D. Actual % Benzene Measured % Benzene
Pu 69 63.1 61.9
In addition to the blind standard materials analysis, a selected number
of liquid leak and line samples were analyzed by GC/MS to confirm that the
amounts of benzene found by GC were only benzene and were not any coeluting
compounds. Analysis of four samples on each of two columns, as depicted
graphically in Figures 5-1 through 5-8, demonstrates that there were no other
compounds present with the same retention time as benzene.
5.2.2 ACCURACY CHECKS
Accuracy checks were used to evaluate the overall accuracy of the sampling
and analysis techniques. It basically involves inducing a known flow rate of
a concentrated calibration gas into the sampling system and taking a bag sample
of the diluted calibration gas at the exit of the system. Analysis of the bag
17
-------
FRM 17439 SPECTRUM 84
LHWC.ST 4t 78.0,100.0 77.0, 85.6
LriST 4i 76.0, 5.3 77.0, 35.6
RETEhfTION TIME 4.9
50. a, 19.6 51. «, 9.6
78.»,ie«.9 79. a. 7.2
PACE 1 V • 1.00
100
80
60
20
0
L00
80
60
40
20
TmHtnjr
JjL
80
6»
140
160
1 180
' see
sse
840
260
' 2S0 ' 300 '
Figure 5-1. Mass spectrum of light oil from the
separator on SP-2100/Bentone.
18
-------
FRN 17SOS . SPECTRUM 193 RETENTION TIME 6.9
LufiOST 4t 78.9,199.0 77.8, 87.5 59.9, 81.3 52.9, 20.7
LAST 4» 79.9, 6.5 89.9, .3 84.9, .4 97.0, .1
PAGE 1 V • 1.00
100
80
60
40
20
0
89
60
40
20
0
i.
2« ' 44» 69 80 10e 129 14« 160
' ISa ' 230 ' 228 ' S40 ' 2fi'0 ' 280 ' 300 ' 320
Figure 5-2. Mass spectrum of light oil from the
separator on TCEP.
ia
-------
1
L*l
LA«
100
80
69
49
se
9
tee
89
60
40.
20
?RN 175 U SPECTRU1 X37
WJST 4» 78.9,199.9 77. e, a
>T •*: 76.9, 6.8 77.9. £
III
J1LJ Jll 1 L .'I
.... ,„...„,_„ ^ JH,m . J|ll. _L „.,...
' ISA ' 20« ' aae ' a<
RETENTION TIME 7.9
(S.S 59.9, 17.7 61.0, 16.6
ti.6 78.9,199.9 79.9, 7.1
PAGE 1 V • 1.09
j
M 199 129 149 169
10 ' 369 ' 280 ' 300 ' 32B
Figure 5-3 . Mass spectrxim of liquid leak from PU-139
on TCEP.
20
-------
Lfl
LA
100
8
-------
WORK *REA SPECTRUn PRN 17509 PAGE IV- 1.09
UArtGST 4» 73.0,100.0 59.9, 25.8 77.0, 34.3 51. a, 22.9
LAST' 4* 77.0, 24.3 78^0,100.0 79.0, 8.6 85.0, 3.0
•»• 128 -123 -133
109
80
g<%
49
29
9
199
69
49
£9.
9
||
J I III 1 JL.......lM.ll,Ji
t
29 49 69 89 199 129 149 169
' ISA F S09 '829 '349 ' 2fi9 ' 289 ' 399 • ' 3M
Figure 5-5. Mass spectrum of line sample from
scrubber "B" on TCEP-
22
-------
uo
LA
100
80
60
40
0
60
40
20
0
»K AREft SPECTRUM FRN 17447 PAGE 1 V - 1.00
RGST 4J 77.9,100.0 50.0, 37.9 51.0, 33.0 77.0, 31.9
5T 41 76.0, 6.4 77.0, 31.9 77.9,100.0 79.0, 6.E
23 -18
1 1
J- J III III I if ifllnrJl
1
S9 49 69 99 ' 109 ' 180 ' 140 ' 160
' 180 ' 2a
-------
1
LAI
LA!
100
80
60
40
29
0
100
60
40.
20.
rRN 17510 SPECTRUM 129
?GST 41 78.0,100.0 77.0, £
ST 4« 76.0, 6.1 77.0, 1
N imrtiJi »fi»i!*J
S9 4« 64
' 130 '' 300 ' 330 ' 3'
RETENTION TIME 7.4
17.8 50.0, 34.6 51.0, 23.1
17.8 78.0,100.0 79.0, 7.3
PAGE 1 V • 1.00
I
...... „„, ,.„ j.... ..«, ...| r_ ...., ...,
B0 100 120 140 169
10 sea eae qe^ ^20
Figure 5-7. Mass spectrum of line sample from
scrubber "A" on TCEP-
2A
-------
LAI
LA
199
30
60
40
20
0
100
80
60
40
29.
9
F-RN 17448 SPECTRU1 83 RETENTION TIME 4.9
RGST 4t 78.0,100.0 77.0, 84.8 51.0, 15.3 50.0, 15.3
5T 4t 76.0, 5.5 77.0, 84.8 78.0,100.0 79.0, 6.4
PAGE 1 V - 1.90
|l
i
' 20 ' 40 60 80 ' 100 ' 120 ' 140 ' 160
f«r* ..r*|,Ji. ,r.Lj,... ,,.*y,,. •...).... .r»|»>i ...*|*..« r**i|».. .,..|..*. *...|.... ,...|.... ,,,,y.w, >...| *..|..«* JIII|IMj PfflpTII |lll|
19d S0I) 890 246 SflO SfiO 3M 32^
Figure 5-8.
Mass spectrum of line sample from
scrubber "A" on SP-2100/Bentone.
25
-------
sample by THC or GC provides data to calculate the measured leak rate. The
induced leak rate is calculated from the flow rate and concentration of the
induced standard gas.
Table 5-4 lists the data from four accuracy tests. The measured leak
rate, induced leak rate, and the percent recovery are shown. The percent
recovery is calculated as follows:
Measured leak rate „ , „»„
Percent Recovery = -—; ——: X 100%
Induced leak rate
The average recovery and its standard deviation are 90.88% and 6.77% respec-
tively.
TABLE 5-4. ACCURACY CHECKS DATA LISTING
Date
12/01/80
12/02/80
12/02/80
12/03/80
Standard
Type
Hexane
Hexane
Benzene
Benzene
Measured
Leak Rate
(Ibs/hr)
0.00079596
0.00073697
0.00061463
0.00076771
Induced
Leak Rate
(Ibs/hr)
0.00090550
0.00081650
0.00072420
0.00076410
Average:
Standard Deviation:
Percent
Recovery
87.903
90.259
84.870
100.472
90.88%
6.77%
26
-------
WHEELING-PITTSBURGH STEEL
MONESSEN PLANT
APPENDIX A
CALCULATIONS AND METHODS
A-l Sample Emission Calculations
A-2 EPA Proposed Method 21
A-l
-------
WHEELING-PITTSBURGH STEEL
MONESSEN PLANT
A-l Sample Emission Calculations
A-2
-------
APPENDIX A-l
EMISSION CALCULATIONS
The emission rates can be calculated from the physical measurements
recorded during the operation of the sampling train and with the anlyses
of the hydrocarbon content of the air passing through the sampling train.
The basic equation is:
k! DF(P-AP)M(C -C )
where L = Hydrocarbon vapor emission rate, Ib/hr
_6
kj = 2.75x10 (°R-min-mole/SCF-in.Hg-hr-ppmw)
D = Dry gas meter correction factor (dimensionless)
F = Flow rate, cubic feet per minute
P = Ambient atmospheric pressure, in. Hg
Ap = Pressure differential between ambient pressure
and pressure at dry gas meter, in. Hg
M = Average molecular weight of gas (essentially
air) passing through dry gas meter, Ib/lb.mole
Q
T = Total hydrocarbon concentration in air passing
through the dry gas meter, ppmw
Q
A = Total hydrocarbon concentration in air near the
sampled leak source, ppmw
T = Temperature of gas (air) stream at the dry gas
meter, °F.
The constant kj is a product of several conversion -constants:
, (520°R) x (60 min/hr) _
6
(379 -) x (29.92 in. Hg) x (10 ppmw)
A-3
-------
kl = 2.75 x 10~6(°R-min-mole/SCF-in.Hg-hr-ppmw)
As an example calculation, assume a total hydrocarbon concentration of 19,000
ppmw was measured in the gas stream from a tent around a leaking source in an
ethylene unit. The hydrocarbon would be assumed to be hexane (MW-86). The
following values were recorded during the sampling:
F = 1.5 CFM
P = 29.9 in. Hg
AP = 2.0 in. Hg (at the dry gas meter)
Q
T = 19,000 ppmw
Q
A = 20 ppmw
T = 75°F
and
D = 0.95
Then
M =
19,000 + 10 - 19,000
86 29
29.37
The vapor emission rate L is then calculated from Equation (A-l)
_ (2.75 x 10~6)(0.95)(1.5)(29.9 - 2.0)(29.37X19,000 - 20)
460 + 75
L = 0.114 Ib/hr.
i The vapor emission rate of benzene is estimated from the hydrocarbon
emission rate and the concentration data for benzene and non-methane hydro-
carbons. The equation used is:
'CB - CAB)
where
B = L
(A-2)
(CT - C
B = Benzene vapor emission rate, Ib/hr
y = Benzene concentration in air passing through
J3
the dry gas meter, ppmw
= Benzene concentration in air near the sampled
vD
leak source, ppmw.
A-4
-------
For example, using the previous example with the data:
CL = 15,500 ppmw
D
CAB = 10 PpmW
the benzene vapor emission rate is calculatedj
B = 0.114 (15,500 - 10)
(19,000 - 20)
B = 0.093 -Ib/hr.
The emission rates for liquid leaks are calculated by the equation:
TLLR = 7.93 -^— (A-3)
t
where TLLR = Total liquid leak rate, Ib/hr
7.93 = Conversion factor from g/sec to Ib/hr
V = Volume of liquid collected, cc
t = Time of collection, sec
P = Density of sample, g/cc.
For example, 4.0 cc of liquid from a leaking source were captured in 60
seconds, and the liquid was found to have a density of 0.75 g/cc, then:
TLLR = (7.93)(0.75)(4.0)/(60)
TLLR = 0.40 Ib/hr.
The liquid benzene leak rate is:
BLLR = TLLR [Benz.J (A-4)
100
where BLLR = Benzene liquid leak rate
[Benz]= Benzene concentration in liquid, weight percent
For example, if the liquid leak described above was found to have 79 wt per-
cent benzene then:
BLLR = (0.40)(79)/(100)
BLLR = 0.31 Ib/hr.
A-5
-------
WHEELING-PITTSBURGH STEEL
MONESSEN PLANT
A-2 EPA Proposed Method 21
A-6
-------
PROPOSED METHOD 21. DETERMINATION OF.VOLATILE ORGANIC,COMPOUND LEAKS
1.- Applicability and Principle
1.1 Applicability. This method applies to the determination of
volatile organic compound (VOC) leaks from organic process equipment.
These sources include, but are not limited to, valves, flanges and other
connections, pumps and compressors, pressure relief devices, process
drains, open-ended valves, pump and compressor seal system degassing
vents, accumulator vessel vents, and access door seals.
1.2 Principle. A portable instrument is used to detect VOC leaks
from individual sources. The instrument detector is not specified, but
it must meet the specifications and performance criteria contained in
paragraph 2.1.
2. Apparatus
2.1 Monitoring Instrument. The monitoring instrument shall be as
fol lows:
2.1.1 Specifications.
a. The VOC instrument detector shall respond to the organic
compounds being processed. Detectors which may meet this requirement
include, but are not limited to, catalytic oxidation, flame ionization,
infrared absorption, and photoionization.
A-7
-------
b. The instrument shall be intrinsically safe for operation in
explosive atmospheres as defined by the applicable U.S.A. Standards
(e.g., National Electrical Code by the National Fire Prevention Association).
c. The instrument shall be able to measure the leak definition
concentration specified in the regulation.
d. The instrument shall be equipped with a pump so that a
continuous sample is provided to the detector. The nominal sample flow
rate shall be 1-3 liters per minute.
e. The scale of the instrument meter shall be readable to
±5 percent of the specified leak definition concentration.
2.1.2 Performance Criteria. The instrument must meet the
following performance criteria. The definitions and evaluation
procedures for each parameter are given in Section 4.
2.1.2.1 The instrument response time must be 30 seconds or less.
The response time must be determined for the instrument system
configuration to be used during testing, including dilution equipment.
The use of a system with a shorter response time than that specified
will reduce the time required for field component surveys.
2.1.2.2 Calibration Precision: The calibration precision must be
less than or equal to 10 percent of the calibration gas value.
2.1.2.3 Quality Assurance. The instrument shall be subjected to
response time and calibration precision tests prior to being placed in
service. The calibration precision test shall be repeated every
6 months thereafter. If any modification or replacement of the
A-8
-------
instrument detector is required, the instrument shall be retested and a
new 6 month quality assurance test schedule will apply. The response
time test shall be repeated if any modifications to the sample pumping
system or flow configuration is made that would change the response
time.
2.3 Calibration Gases. The monitoring instrument is calibrated in
terms of parts per million by volume (ppmv) of the compound specified in
the applicable regulation. The calibration gases required for
monitoring and instrument performance evaluation are a zero gas (air,
3 ppmv VOC) and a calibration gas in air mixture approximately equal to
the leak definition specified in the regulation. If cylinder
calibration gas mixtures are used, they must be analyzed and certified
by the manufacturer to be within ±2 percent accuracy. Calibration gases
may be prepared by the user according to any accepted gaseous standards
preparation procedure that will yield a mixture accurate to within
±2 percent. Alternative calibration gas species may be used in place of
the calibration compound if a relative response factor for each
instrument is determined so that calibrations with the alternative
species may be expressed as calibration compound equivalents on the
meter readout.
3. Procedures
3.1 Calibration. Assemble and start up the VOC analyzer and
recorder according to the manufacturer's instructions. After the
appropriate warmup period and zero or internal calibration procedure,
introduce the calibration gas into the instrument sample probe. Adjust
the instrument meter readout to correspond to the calibration gas value.
A-9.
-------
If a dilution apparatus is used, calibration must include the instrument
and dilution apparatus assembly. The nominal dilution factor may be
used to establish a scale factor for converting to an undiluted basis.
For example, if a nominal 10:1 dilution apparatus is used, the meter
reading for a 10,000 ppm calibration would be set at 1,000. During
'field surveys, the scale factor of 10 would be used to convert
measurements to an undiluted basis.
3.2 Individual Source Surveys.
3.2.1 Case I - Leak Definition Based on Concentration Value.
Place the probe inlet at the surface of the component interface where
leakage could occur. Move the probe along the interface periphery while
observing the instrument readout. If an increased meter reading is
observed, slowly probe the interface where leakage is indicated until
the maximum meter reading is obtained. Leave the probe inlet at this
maximum reading location for approximately two times the instrument
response time. If the maximum observed meter reading is greater than
the leak definition in the applicable regulation, record and report the
results as specified in the regulation reporting requirements. Examples
of the application of this general technique to specific equipment types
are:
a. Valves—The most common source of leaks from valves is at the
seal between the stem and housing. Place the probe at the interface
where the stem exits the packing gland and sample the stem
circumference. Also, place' the probe at the interface of the packing
gland take-up flange seat and sample the periphery. In addition, survey
.A-lO
-------
valve housings of multipart assembly at the surface of all interfaces
where leaks can occur.
b. Flanges and Other Connect!ons--For welded flanges, place the
probe at the outer edge of the flange-gasket interface and sample around
the circumference of the flange. Sample other types of nonpermanent
joints (such as threaded connections) with a similar traverse.
c. Pumps and Compressors—Conduct a circumferential traverse at
the outer surface of the pump or compressor shaft and seal interface.
If the source is a rotating shaft, position the probe inlet within one
centimeter of the shaft-seal interface for the survey. If the housing
configuration prevents a complete traverse of the shaft periphery,
sample all accessible portions. Sample all other joints on the pump or
compressor housing where leakage can occur.
d. Pressure Relief Devices—The configuration of most pressure
relief devices prevents sampling at the sealing seat interface. For
those devices equipped with an enclosed extension, or horn, place the
probe inlet at approximately the center of the exhaust area to the
atmosphere for sampling.
e. Process Drains—For open drains, place the probe inlet at
approximately the center of the area open to the atmosphere for
sampling. For covered drains, place the probe at the surface of the
cover interface and conduct a peripheral traverse.
f. Open-Ended Lines or Valves—Place the probe inlet at
approximately the center of the opening to the atmosphere for sampling.
A-ll
-------
g. Seal System Degassing Vents and Accumulator Vents—Place the
probe inlet at approximately the center of the opening to the atmosphere
for sampling.
h. Access Door Seals—Place the probe inlet at the surface of the
door seal interface and conduct a peripheral traverse.
3.2.2 Cas.e II-Leak Definition Based on "No Detectable Emission".
a. Determine the local background concentration around the source
by moving the probe inlet randomly upwind and downwind at distance of
one to two meters from the source. If an interference exists with this
determination due to a nearby emission or leak, the local background
concentration may be determined at distances closer to the source, but
in no case shall the distance be less than 25 centimeters. Note the
background concentration and then move the probe inlet to the surface of
the source and conduct a survey as described in 3.2.1. If a concentration
increase greater than 2 percent of the concentration-based leak definition
is obtained, record and report the results as specified by the regulation.
b. For those cases where the regulation requires a specific device
installation, or that specified vents be ducted or piped to a control
device, the existence of these conditions shall be visually confirmed.
When the regulation also requires that no detectable emissions exist,
visual observations and sampling surveys are required. Examples of this
technique are:
i. Pump or Compressor Seals—If applicable, determine the type
of shaft seal. Perform a survey of the local area ambient VOC
A-12
-------
concentration and determine if detectable emissions exist as described
in 3.2.2.a.
ii. Seal system degassing vents, accumulator vessel vents,
pressure relief devices—If applicable,, observe whether or not the
applicable ducting or piping exists. Also, determine if any sources
•
exist in the ducting or piping where emissions could occur prior to the
control device. If the required ducting or piping exists and there are
no sources of where the emissions could be vented to the atmosphere
prior to the control device, then it is presumed that no detectable
emissions are present.
4. Instrument Performance Evaluation Procedures
4.1 Definitions.
4.1.1 Calibration Precision. The difference between the average
VOC concentration indicated by the meter readout for consecutive
repetitions and the known concentration of a test gas mixture.
4.1.2 Response Time. The time interval from a step change in VOC
concentration at the input of the sampling system to the time at which
90 percent of the corresponding final value is reached as displayed on
the instrument readout meter.
4.2 Evaluation Procedures. At the beginning of the instrument
performance evaluation test, assemble and start up the instrument
according to the manufacturer's instructions for recommended warmup
period and preliminary adjustments. If a dilution apparatus is used
during field surveys, the evaluation procedure must be performed on the
instrument-dilution system combination.
A-13
-------
4.2.1 Calibration Precision Test. Make a total of nine
measurements by alternately using zero gas and the specified calibration
gas. Record the meter readings (example data sheet shwon in Figure 21-
1).
•4.2.2 Response Time Test Procedure. Introduce zero gas into the
instrument sample probe. When the meter reading has stabilized, switch
quickly to the specified calibration gas. Measure the time from
concentration switching to 95 percent of final stable reading. Perform
this test sequence three times and record the results (example data
sheet given in Figure 21-2).
4.3 Calculations. All results are expressed as mean values,
calculated by:
Where:
- - i £ x
x n I *1
x. = Value of the measurements.
2 = Sum of the individual values.
— = Mean value.
n = Number of data points.
A-14
-------
WHEELING-PITTSBURGH STEEL
MONESSEN PLANT
APPENDIX B
SAMPLING DATA SHEETS
B-l Screening Data
B-2 Screening Sheet For Sample Data
B-3 Sample Data
B-4 Analysis Data
B-5 OVA and TLV Calibration Data
B-6 Dry Gas Meter Calibration Data
B-7 Accuracy Check Data
B-l
-------
WHEELING-PITTSBURGH STEEL
MONESSEN PLANT
B-l Screening Data
B-2
-------
TABLE B-l.l. SOURCE TYPE IDENTIFICATION CODES
Source Type
Source Type
Code
Flange
Process Drain
Open-End Line
Agitator Seal
Relief Valve
Screwed Fitting
Valves
Block valve - gate type
Block valve - globe type
Block valve - plug type
Block valve - ball type
Block valve - butterfly type
Block valve - other types
Control valve - gate type
Control valve - globe type
Control valve - plug type
Control valve - ball type
Control valve - butterfly type
Control valve - other types
On-Line Pump Seals*
Single, mechanical, emission point at seal
Single, mechanical, emission point at vent
Single, mechanical, other emission point
Double, mechanical, emission point at seal
Double, mechanical, emission point at vent
Double, mechanical, other emission point
1
2
3
4
5
6
10
11
12
13
14
15
20
21
22
23
24
25
30
31
32
33
34
35
Continued
B-3
-------
TABLE B-l.l. CONTINUED
Source Type
Source Type
Code
Single, packed, emission point at seal
Single, packed, emission point at vent
Single, packed, other emission point
Sealless pumps
Off-Line Pump Seals
Single, mechanical, emission point at seal
Single, mechanical, emission point at vent
Single, mechanical, other emission point
Double, mechanical, emission point at seal
Double, mechanical, emission point at vent
Double, mechanical, other emission point
Single, packed, emission point at seal
Single, packed, emission point at vent
Single, packed, other emission point
Sealless pumps
On-Line Compressor Seals
Single, mechanical, emission point at seal
Single, mechanical, emission point at vent
Single, mechanical, other emission point
Double, mechanical, emission point at seal
Double, mechanical, emission point at vent
Double, mechanical, other emission point
Single, packed, emission point at seal
Single, packed, emission point at vent
Single, packed, other emission point
Sealless compressors
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
Continued
B-4
-------
TABLE B-l.l. CONTINUED
c. T, Source Type
Source Type _ , JV
]* Code
Off-Line Compressor Seals
Single, mechanical, emission point at seal 60
Single, mechanical, emission point at vent 61
• Single, mechanical, other emission point 62
Double, mechanical, emission point at seal 63
Double, mechanical, emission point at vent 64
Double, mechanical, other emission point 65
Single, packed, emission point at seal 66
Single, packed, emission point at vent 67
Single, packed, other emission point 68
Sealless compressors 69
Exhausters
Suction side 70
High pressure side 71
* 0 = outboard seal; I = inboard seal
B-5
-------
TABLE B-1.2. STREAM IDENTIFICATION CODES
Code Description of Stream
1 Coke oven gas
3 Steam and vaporized light oil
5 Light oil (BTX and 2° oil)
6 Light oil used to clean scrubber
7 Benzolized wash oil
8 Rectifier bottoms (essentially BTX and 2° oil as #5 above)
Service
1 Gas
2 Light liquid
3 Heavy liquid
Elevation
1 Sources at ground level
2 Sources at one level above ground level
3 Sources at two levels above ground level
B-6
-------
SCREENING DATA SHEET
UMH"
o
5
Screen
Team
-H (1J
C 3
0) -i
0) fl
M >
o
Ul
13
to
25
28
Line
Tempera
LJ
Air
Temperatu
i:
l\4
(31 3
JI
JQ
ilfi
2?
10
o
2
Jl
o
l\\
il
Q
\a
n
Jo
Q
18
o|o
I*1
(o
J^
\0
13 14
0
114
lU
Ji
it
(o
0
-2
Ul
1C
Jo
11),
10
f;,
10
0
0 \ 0
0 \0
0
(0
z.
1
10
•IIP
10
COMMENTS :
13
OIL.
X.
-------
SCREENING DATA SHEET
0) (d
H >
U
Ul
13
p >,
0 EH
Primary.
LJl
fN
WVWJ-S
28
tULl L'iul-1
32
I i
ilQ
3
1
JZ
0
7
0
11
jo
^0
JO
0
jo
10
Jo
JO
0
o
0
0
It
0
0
II'
0
I I
o
lo
o
Jf»l
10
Q
COMMENTS :
r^s*-
-------
SCREENING DATA SHEET
i
1
|
i
1
1
r~
1
1
1
1
1
\
\
t
I
I
1
1
\
I
Month
\
\
\
\
(
1
i
1
1
t
1
1
1
i
I
i -
i
i
i
Q
3
2
Z
2
2
1
—)
2
7.
Z.
2
Z
z
-7
?
->-
Z
Z
z
5
\_?
5
s
5
=>•*
S
s
s
s
^
s
|S"
Is
K
i~
p
IS
is
s'
o
c
-^
c
o
o
b
o
b
0
t?
o
It?
0
1C?
^
^,
0
lie
b.
M
M
Process
4-1
•H
C
3
1
/
-
/
/
/
\
(
\
\
}
\
\
\
)
[
o
0)
w
4
3
^
^
*i
i
»
^
3
^
^
)
(
/
ty
3
}
4
25
).a
^
n
^
s
L i /'
\)'
b J
p»
L
1
v»
1
U-
/
|-
a
u
c.
o
o
28
/v
s
29
,• — •
/
>> i
-Mat
Q
H
—
st
U*H
-*-
flrli:
K
3
1
&
U-
u
c
0
CJ
32
^-r
/
33
^
O
^4
3
4J
CJ nj
c ^
3 |
CJ
E-
-
=>
V J
t,
o
t
1
[ •
1
1
1
37
a
k.
0) T
C IT
•H cr
J a
j-
a
L 1
D-
•H
U]
a
id
i-1 Ambient
—
3
,J
W TJ
< C
6
CJ
&-•
i — i
—
b
o
i-;
2;
V
^
2
^
2
^
Z.
COMMENTS :
T/-. >j EAT .-.'
H,-,\T ex;
-^
-------
SCREENING DATA SHEET
Screen
Team
tr
c
•H (11
C 3
0) ^H
OJ n)
13
22
P-rl imry,
25
28
~*^aj~° r 1 ri '
29
Line
essu
psig
AjrUjj
Ai
Temper
Op
Mi
2 |S
oi\
If
.
Z-
Ml
2l2
oh
u
2|5
^
10
Jo
2\S
QL
^
0
II
2 |
z
1
2.
0
z
Ms
ifc
z
2
7,
II
Z
zl<
£L
12
Jo
|3
s
±t
LC
it
dzr
-I-HH
J5
J2h
Jfi
e
H+
/
i
c.*lc? |t
|A/<£<£
o
aa
tztdzb
2J£
OH
i ioi h.
COMMENTS :
L.O
e. ^
) TI-. .^c -n PI f, 1-1 j ^) TO u c- H T o i c p
•?) fa
H&pei ex j
C- OC>'7?i:-'
^r\C^
r) SAAtft "
-------
SCREEMING DATA SHEET
1
/
I
I
1
1
/
I
1
1
I
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
j:
I
1
1
/
1
1
1
i
/
/
/
(
/
i
I
1
i
/
/
1
1
3
2\S
2|£
2\6
Z|5
2|£
2\6
z\*
Z\5
•z\£
2\5
*•* IcT"
2|5
2\6
Z\6
2|5
2|£
2 |5
E
C
C
a
a
u
u
UI
5
*
o
o
o
o
0
0
Q>
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
0
o
o
o
\
§
0)
t*
1
i
i
i
i
(
1
1
/
/
/
I/
I/
1
/
/
'
<
'
4-1
c
1
u.
*J
Ul
c
l-i
7
2
2
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
2
2
Z
2
Z
2
2
Z
2
Z
7
8
01
So
3 H
O
Ul
fl
£
a
^
1^
8
8
B
S
9
9
9
9
C}
9
9
9
9
0
/
2
3
4
5
£
7
5
9
6
/
£
U
|5
7
£>
9
6'
13
.
/
CT>
C
H (U
C 3
0) .H
U ID
Ul
O
o
\o
\o
0
0
\°
\o
\o
\0
\o
\o
0
\o
0
0
\o
o\o
\Q
\0
I
/
/
/
/
/
3
1
1
1
0
(c
(r
1
I/
10
0
0
(?
(p
0
(o
6
o
6,
t.
b
0
0
ul
ul
111
ft
22
|
4->
•H
C
P
|
/
)
1
s
1
L
1
V
.u Service
a
)
^
j
{
)
;
j
/
)
i.
^
1
V i
25
***»
u^t.
H
i»*i
if*.
|
V)
9
r~
*i-
o
u
28
29
5SCO
•Hert
a
H
ndai
r*Jlii
,
-y
a
u
32
Q?
33
a>
B
01 «
Sj S
I
1
K
o
*
o
37
a
t-
01 S
c u
•H U
^ a
i-
a
a>
•H
Ul
ft
/
C
f
h
4J
C
01
•H
41
d)
3
M n
•H In
** I
a
EH
w
fe
O
h^
,
B
•H
10
a>
rH
W
44
/
/
/
/
/
/
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
{
t
/
/
/
T
I
Ul
g
o
45
2
2
COMMENTS :
m in? ft_
2} PUMP
OuT£O/»tn
- IO
opm • itJK0A'(fe>
zou^fij-r
t f J
-------
Og-t(=>
)\Q
1^
7
7
/
o
o
o
/ \o
\(o
1
/
o
o
I
}
L*
0
O
(o
to
to
Process
Unit
1
|/
\
|^
(^
(
7
/
/
)
)
/
]
\
?
V
01
o
-H
HI
Ul
24
1
Z
2
Z.
z.
Z-
2,
y
/
t
X
z
•L
Z
2
7
7-
2-
2-
/
^t!i^i
WV37/J-S
ai
in
IN
8
^
12)
/
/
l?
i
U
c
o
CJ
28
SecanHSry
a
M
29
1
32
I
^
u>
UJ
Line
Temperature
°F
i
5 0
UJ
*J
Line
Pressure
psig
^
G
r
i
i
H1 Ambient
Air
Temperature
°F
\
jt | O | L/
| |
| |
1 1
£». Elevation *•
/-
/
/
/
/
J
1
I
?
z
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
I"1 Comments ]
2
2
2
2
COMMENTS :
Sconces. //l-J2o finer
e a. ji^Fm*
3)
-------
SCREENING DATA SHEET
1
f
1
1
[
/
1
1
1
/
I
1
I
(
1
I
/
/
/
/
/
Month
/
/
/
/
/
/
1
1
1
1
1
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
;
/
/
a
a
3
zk
Z\5
•z\z
?\S
2 5
2|5
2 S
2\S
2 5
Z\S
2 5
2 $
2 5
2 5
zk
2 6
2 6
2\S
r
? 5T
c
c
c
a
u
t4
U
Ul
5
6>
<7
(9
0
O
o
o
0
o
o
0
o
o
o
o
0
o
0
F>
§
&
1
/
/
/
/
1
i
(
1
i
t
1
t
t
t
1
1
1
1
1
1
c
•p
0)
5
^
Z
2.
Z
2
Z
Z
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
-z
Z
^
Z
^
£*
?
CD
Source
ID
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
1
I
I/
/
/
/
1
/
<2\l
2\2
Z|3
2(4
2|5
2|(^
Z|7
Z|B
2|9
3|i
3 /
^ 2
S 3
3ft
3\6
2\(*
5 7
3\fi
Q\CL
V\H
0 1
c
•H AA
1 /\o o
\ °
01
U
£
S
20
/
/
/
/
/
»
/
/
/
5
/
/
/
/
/
/
0
1
*
\°
0
\°
\s
0
(0
o
0
0
•H
B
\
U
i
/
j
<
4
(
<
^
(
(,
(
\
(
\
i
1
i
>
r
1
|
)
1
1
)
J
;
?
^
}
t-
8
•H
£
0)
Ul
24
^£_
f
)
/
)
{
;)
j
(.
/
f
i
s
/
/
>
*-)
^y
->
z.
/
IfliVnri.
?
Q 4
H ^
«
|5
1
»
/
§
u
28
)
5
*"pfionnd T i
Hit^ri.
Q
H
29
| |
, -\
32
X
X^
§
4J
0) ID
cut.
•H
(0
». •
•-H
H
14
/
1
tn
u
6
45
2
2
2
COMMENTS :
/) LlQUiO
In
2±_i
I*/
-------
PATA
SCREENING DATA SHEET
/2/Z/80
T.
\
1
1
i
1
i
I
i
I
1
1
i
1
1
I
1
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
1
1
1
'\l
1
1 \)
I
/
i
/
f
3
3
2|^
2|k
2 16,
2\(*
•Z
2
^
u
6.
2|u
2
2
2
•2
6>
6
(ff
(*
2k
2
2
(*
t.
2U
2
G
2 (C,
2(6
Z|G
tn
Screening
Team
0p
op
0
O
\
\
1
O|l
0
1
Q\ \
o
/"
0\i
O
/
0\)
0
o
/
/.
0\l
o\\
o
/
o\l
0\l
0\\
-J Instrument 1
2
2
z
~2
2
2-
2
2
2
2.
2
-2
Z
2
2
-2
2.
Z
2
2
05
Source
ID
/ 3
/. A
N
/Kl/
1/14
2
/ [41-2
/kk
Is
/ |4|^
/|4|7
/|4
|g
/kk
1/15
/|5
^
/
I/ Isle
/ 5
3
/i*k
I/ Is
/ 5"
/ 5"
5"
7
/I5I8
tr
c
•H 01
C 3
at >~i
ai nl
^ >
o
Ul
] 3
l2lob
LltMo
o
o
o
l5"lo
kk>
^
0
0
A
1^
1^
01
U ill
^ a
3 >,
O H
Ul
20
3I67
3 |fc
3|g,
4 If/.
4k
/
/
/
Q
/ |o
l\0
1
0
1
o
l\0
o
l\0
1
6
6*
/
tf
(U
10 -
Process
Unit
\
I
\
\\J
0)
o
•H
£
0)
Ul
24
'/
_>
1
;•
/
*
i,
i
/
i
j
i
i
'!
Mei Lei* icrl
a 1
u)
cJ
25 Vt
•
16
11
IS
15
3
'
-
>
>
>
r
S
'
1
3
j
f
^
\
hi
5
3
j
/
u
c
0
u
28
Jteter-ral
Q
H
29
U
VA
32
I
0
X
I
0
U)
UJ
Line
Temperature
°F
UJ
•-J
Line
Pressure
psig
1 4 Id.
i /I i-^
1 3 1 -4
|0
,b
>-• Ambient
Air
Temperature
Op
1 1 Uo
rl&lo
IGIO
c
o
-H
-p
in
m
i-H
u
44
/'
I
/
/
7
;>
3
^
3
3
2
2
2
^
2
/
/
1
1
1
S
5
2
'Z
•z
-z
2
^
/
/
/
/
/
/
1
Z
Z
2
Z
z
COMMENTS :
nr i3Ase of
J*J_
A
POMP ~Tn $e*io L.O. ~7Z>
0JTtf/)Pl(>.>
/A/ ^.z-e.
(4eA-r
-------
SCREENING DATA SHEET
i
Month
I
v
\
]
}
I
1
,
\
1
\
1
j
1*
\
V
\
I
1
\
t
i
I
(
,
1
i
I
I
1
1
i
i
a
a
3
'2~\(c3
•2-k
-2_|c*
2_|fc,
-z|u
2k,
z
U
zlu
z-lc*
z|c,
^
G*
2-| C*
z|u
Z-|<^
el^
2.| UP
2
U
r~
2k
2
6
u.
Screening
Team
0
3
O
I
I
1
0 t
o|i
o|i
o
\
D\\
O
I
oh
o
a
O
1
I
1
0\i
o
0
0
I
\
I
L-I-
Cj r 1
0
o
1
1
-j Instrument
7
"2
-7
7
7
Z
2
-2
2
Z
"2
2
2
7-
X
2
Z
:
0
to
3
Q
M
1
(
1
H
^h
r
b
U
,-o
|
L.
Hfci*
^
|I'|6|S
bib
/
^h
M£
(c
' n
'17
17
9
D
/
1 2-
/ |7|3,
ni4
i
i
i
\
1\$
—i
i
A
i
1 ^
|u»
I
o
a*
c
-rH C
C 3
OJ rH
O 10
O
Ul
13
•#.
1 i
1
—I
— /-
0
r-
k7)
o
\0>
0
3
0
0
\o
(J
Q
0
0
ei
h
Id
*
tO
Source
Type
i
i
i
(
1
/
,-
/ ;
1
O
0
l\0
l\D
l\0
i
I
(
1
1
/
I
0
0
0
o-
0
0
0
0
iAj
-&\-\&—
•£
7
1 , \ . , „ ^K^7 •T)
(*
1.
(VJ
Isj
Process
Unit
\
<>
l)
\\
\\
\
^
\\
\(
\\
\\
\
\
{
\
\
M"
i
/
t. Service
2
/
(
(
/
/
Y
/
/
)
}
\
(
/
i.
i(
(
*
2
1
;, Prim.iry
UJ
ci
25 \/i
I/?
l«
5
5
k
h
«;
/
\~
~1
o
U
28
Secondary
.'.tlaterial
Q
29
| |
H
1-
h-
Of
U
J
u>
32
•-
ff)
LO
UJ
Line
Temperature
op
ht-
**s4^:
UJ
•^i
Line
Pressure
psig
---
—
|3|4
1
ij>
>- Ambi LMit
Air
Temperatur>
Op
--•
'':
t \1 In
/ I3IO
1
1
r
\
\
2.
2
TZ
'Z
Z
z
^
z.
z
7_
Z
7_
2_
.
/
1
2
C
?..
t. -
2
^^_
/
/
7_
"iL_-
^
2,
2-
-z
z
2
Z
/
/
L.O 'KtAAtfift. f->
3
3
-------
WHEELING-PITTSBURGH STEEL
MONESSEN PLANT
B-2 Screening Sheet For Sample Data
B-16
-------
RADIAN
Card 1
cj
SCREENING SHEET
FOR SAMPLE DATA
1. Radian Valve/Pump ID
en K/iAioioi/i^
2. Unit/Process/'//'/
3. Plant Name
Mo. Day Yr. .
4. Date
11
6. Before Tenting
Screening Time
(Military Time)
5. Screener's ID
1 7
7. Before Tenting OVA
Screening Value 21*
TLV Screening Value
3 1
UU
8. Screener's ID
38
9. After Sampling [ / [o |4|
Screening. Time
(Military Time)
10. After Sampling OVA
Screening Value
TLV Screening
Value
52
Comment 1 I I
59
Comment 2
61
B-17
-------
RADIAN
Card 1 Is I C
SCREENING SHEET
FOR SAMPLE DATA
X O =\ 8
1. Radian Valve/Pump ID #
H |P |U| 0| I 11.6!
2. Unit/Process
3. Plant Name
L() ~ f*
Mo. Day Yr.
4. Date
/ 13. 01S
6. Before Tenting
Screening Time "
(Military Time)
5. Screener's ID
17
7. Before Tenting OVA
Screening Value
/ K^| <^j (TTJ
XLV Screening Value
3 1
8. Screener's ID
38
9. After Sampling ( [/
Screening Time
(Military Time)
10. After Sampling OVA
Screening Value
TLV Screening
Value
52
Comment 1
59
Comment 2
6 1
B-18
-------
RADIAN
Card 1 Is
SCREENING SHEET
FOR SAMPLE DATA
1. Radian Valve/Pump ID #
Oi
2. Unit/Process
3. Plant Name
f.4J~~T
Mo. Day Yr.
4. Date
0\5
11
6. Before Tenting
Screening Time
(Military Time)
5. Screener's ID
\-\p\\\I
1 7
7. Before Tenting OVA
Screening Value
2"*
TLV Screening Value
3 1
o
!. Screener's ID 11-^.I
38
9. After Sampling
Screening Ti
(Military Time)
10. After Sampling OVA
Screening Value
1
1 \V\o\o\o
TLV Screening
Value
( I I \0\0\C\l
52
Comment 1
59
Comment 2
6 1
B-19
-------
RADIAN
Card 1
SCREENING SHEET
FOR SAMPLE DATA
1. Radian Valve/Pump ID #
O\\ \P\U\0\
III 1"?
2. Unit/Process
3. Plant Name
Mo. Day Yr.
4. Date
01 ^
11
6. Before Tenting
Screening Time
(Military Time)
5. Screener's ID
1 7
7. Before Tenting OVA
Screening Value
2"*
TLV Screening Value
1
1 blob! (
3 1
8. Screener's ID I t^lP V\/
38
9. After Sampling ("|\ |7
Screening Time v^_r
(Military Time)
10. After Sampling OVA
Screening Value
TLV Screening
Value
Comment 1
59
Comment 2
S 1
B-20
-------
RADIAN
Card 1
c]
SCREENING SHEET
FOR SAMPLE DATA
1. Radian Valve/Pump ID #
OK IPIUKPH m
2. Unit/Process C,k'<4 b. I'
3. Plant Name
Mo. Day Yr.
4. Date
VL
11
6. Before Tenting
Screening Time
(Military Time)
5. Screener's ID |D| p|Vl
1 7
7. Before Tenting OVA
Screening Value
I I \L\0\0\0
TLV Screening Value
3 1
8. Screener's ID
38
9. After Sampling
Screening Time
(Military Time)
10. After Sampling OVA
Screening Value iTs"
TLV Screening
Value
52
Comment 1
39
Comment 2
6 1
B-21
-------
RADIAN
Card 1
SCREENING SHEET
FOR SAMPLE DATA
1. Radian Valve/Pump ID #
on i
PIUI&I;
1 s r?
'/
2. Unit/Process /'/1/£; /)._,
3. Plant Name / WVcT;
Mo. Day Yr.
4. Date
11
6. Befpre Tenting (^ l_jj_4|_Si
Screening Time 2^^
(Military Time)
5."* Screener's- ID
1 7
7. 'Before Tenting OVA
Screening Value
TLV Screening Value
3 1
i. Screener's ID
9. After Sampling
Screening Time
(Military Time)
10. After Sampling OVA
Screening Value
|0|C|0|C
TLV Screening
Value
I I 141.? fok ;
Comment 1
59
Comment 2
6 1
B-22
-------
RADIAN
Card 1 Is I C
SCREENING SHEET
FOR SAMPLE DATA
1. Radian Valve/Pump ID #
2. Unit/Process /
3. Plant Name C\] V? S-fev
Mo. Day Yr.
4. Date
1*2
11
5. Screener's ID
17
6. Before Tenting
Screening Time To"
(Military Time)
7. Before Tenting OVA
Screening Value
\Z\0\0\C
21*
TLV Screening Value
3 1
C O
8. Screener's in
38
9. After Sampling ,') || | p \ Q\
Screening Time Vr
(Military Time)
10. After Sampling OVA
Screening Value -•
TLV Screening
Value
52
Comment 1
Comment 2
59
6 1
B-23
-------
RADIAN
Card 1 [§_
SCREENING SHEET
FOR SAMPLE DATA
0 i 3 ^
1. Radian Valve/Pump ID #
2. Unit/Process (/
Plant Name />
Mo. Day Yr.
4. Date
11
6. Before Tenting
Screening Time 2o
(Military Time)
5. Screener's ID
1 7
7. Before Tenting OVA
Screening Value
TLV Screening Value
3 1
8. Screener's ID
38
9. After Sampling 1 |~) [Q| C
Screening Time ^ j
(Military Time)
10. After Sampling OVA
Screening Value
TLV Screening
Value
52
Comment 1
59
Comment 2
6 1
B-24
-------
RADIAN
Card 1 Is Td
SCREENING SHEET
FOR SAMPLE DATA
\ 3 <=]
1. Radian Valve/Pump ID # Pll I P|U|t-Jl * I '''\ I
2. Unit/Process ( c'M" b'i '
- .
3. Plant Name IV ~ ;
Mo. Day Yr.
4. Date
11
6. Before Tenting
Screening Time
(Military Time)
5. Screener's ID [ 0|
17
T. Before Tenting OVA
Screening Value 21*
1 1 \\\°
oy.
TLV Screening Value
3 1
8. Screener's ID
38
9. After Sampling
Screening Time
(Military Time)
J ll |0|C
10. After Sampling OVA
Screening Value
TLV Screening
Value
52
Comment 1
59
Comment 2
6 1
- \oo
B-25
-------
RADIAN
Card 1 is I cl
i
1. Radian Valve/Pump ID #
SCREENING SHEET
FOR SAMPLE DATA
o\ \
P\(L&\\ 141 1
2. Unit/Process
3. Plant Name
Mo. Day Yr.
4. Date
11
6. .Before Tentin;
Screening T
(Military Time)
5. Screener's ID
1 7
7. Before Tenting OVA 'ill
Screening Value
2"*
TLV Screening Value
3 1
9.
Screener's ID I ft ^
38
After Sampling
Screening Time
(Military Time)
10. After Sampling OVA
Screening Value
TLV Screening
Value
[ 1
H-
o c
52
Comment 1 [ [
59
ComiESB.t 2 j j I I 1 I I
B-26
-------
RADIAN
Card 1 Is I C
SCREENING SHEET
FOR SAMPLE DATA
1. Radian Valve/Pump ID # I Oil \\
3. Plant Name
2. Unit/Process
////<. i Zl^ A. 3
~
I /
Mo. Day Yr.
4. Date
/-»< •>
1 1
6. Before Tenting
Screening Time
(Military Time)
5. Screener s ID
J ir ll'-
7. Before Tenting OVA
Screening Value
I
TLV Screening Valu
<1 i i n
8. Screenerrs ID
38
After Sampling
Screening Time
(Military Time)
10. After Sampling OVA
Screening Value
TLV Screening
Value
52
Comment 1
59
Comment 2
6 1
B-27
-------
RADIAN
Card 1 Is I cl
i
1. Radian Valve/Pump ID #
3. Plant Name
SCREENING SHEET
FOR SAMPLE DATA
Oil iViMOlOl
\\T-
2. Unit/Process ( !L
6
((>
Mo. Day Yr.
4. Date
6. Before Tenting
Screening Time
(Military Time)
5. Screener's ID
1 7
7. Before Tenting OVA
Screening Value
10
TLV Screening Valu^ I I I I I
x~—-3.1
8. Screener's ID I I I
38
9. After Sampling
Screening Time 77"
(Military Time)
10. After Sampling OVA
Screening Value
TLV Screening
Value
52
Comment 1
59
Comment 2
6 1
B-28
-------
RADIAN
Card 1 Is I CJ
i
1. Radian Valve/Pump ID #
SCREENING SHEET
FOR SAMPLE DATA
on
u'l.MOir?! \|3
Unit/Process C i-k. '/$/ -
3. Plant Name. ,
J
Mo. Dav Yr.
4. Date
S\o
\ 1
6. Before Tenting
Screening Time
(Military Time)
5. Screener's ID
1 7
7. Before Tenting OVA
Screening Value
TLV Screening Value
"3-1
8. Screener's ID I I
33
9. After Sampling
Screening Time
(Military Time)
10. After Sampling OVA
Screening Value
TLV Screening
Value
52
Comment 1
53
Comment 2
6 1
B-29'
-------
RADIAN
Card 1 Is
SCREENING SHEET
FOR SAMPLE DATA
1. Radian Valve/Pump ID #
0| I
IV
A
1010111ft
2. Unit/Process (,'il(s
3. Plant Name
^/M- -i
Mo. Day Yr.
4. Dater-
11
6. Before Tenting
Screening Time
(Military Time)
5. Screener's ID \£>\?
1 7
7. Before Tenting OVA
Screening Value
TLV Screening Value
3 1
8. Screener's ID I I
38
9. After Sampling
Screening Time 77*
(Military Time)
10. After Sampling OVA
Screening Value
TLV Screening
Value
52
Comment 1
59
Comment 2
5 1
B-30
-------
RADIAN
Card 1 IS Tel
i
1. Radian Valve/Pump ID #
SCREENING SHEET
FOR SAMPLE DATA
UIVIA-IOIM2.I
2. Unit/Process
3. Plant Name (jJ-P
Mo. Day Yr.
4. Date
11
5. Screener's ID
D I
1 7
6. Before Tenting
Screening Time To""
(Military Time)
7- Before Tenting OVA
Screening Value
2"*
1C
TLV Screening Value"
3 1
8. Screener's ID I I I
38
9. After Sampling
Screening Time "77"
(Military Time)
10. After Sampling OVA
Screening Value
TLV Screening
Value
52
Comment 1
59
Comment 2
Jl
6 1
B-31
-------
RADIAN
UKMT
Card 1 IS Id
i
1. Radian Valve/Pump ID #
SCREENING SHEET
FOR SAMPLE DATA
Oi i rpiUu
2. Unit/Process.
-~i
'3. Plant Name
*
3
Mo. Day Yr.
Date
l\2
0\3
61 d
11
Before Tenting [ J<5[ 4 [e^
Screening Time 2o
(Military Time)
5. Screener's ID
17
7. Before Tenting OVA I 1 \^\S] 0\ oj Q XLV Screening Value I I |\ |l|c.-| o|QJ
Screening Value 21* 31
Screener' s ID I I
38
9. After Sampling
Screening Time ITT
(Military Time)
10. After Sampling OVA
Screening Value
TLV Screening
Value
52
Comment 1
59
Comment 2
6 1
B-32
-------
RADIAN
Card 1 \S_
SCREENING SHEET
FOR SAMPLE DATA
•?> | 3 S
1. Radian Valve/Pump ID # lOll lPll?K-J
2. Unit/Process
3. Plant Name
Mo. Day Yr.
4. Date
11
6. Before Tenting
Screening Time
(Military Time)
5. Screener's ID
1 7
7- Before Tenting OVA
Screening Value
TLV Screening Value
\|D|0|0|0
31
p,
Screener ' s
ID
1 1
38
9. After Sampling | [ [ |
Screening Time ^i
(Military Time)
10. After Sampling OVA
Screening Value .+ 5
TLV Screening
Value
52
Comment 1
Comment 2
59
6 1
B-33
-------
RADIAN
Card 1 \S_
SCREENING SHEET
FOR SAMPLE DATA
1. Radian Valve/Pump ID #
3. Plant Name
on iPiijitgmAii
,-
Unit/Process (.?)& /)ui -
J /
Mo. Day Yr.
4. Date
11
Before Tenting
Screening Time
(Military Time)
5. Screener's ID
17
7. Before Tenting OVA
Screening Value 21+
J2ICIC
TLV Screening Value
3 1
8. Screener's ID I I
38
9. After Sampling
Screening Time
(Military Time)
10. After Sampling OVA
Screening Value
TLV Screening
Value
52
Comment 1
59
Comment 2
6 1
B-34
-------
RADIAN
Card 1 Is I d
i
1. Radian Valve/Pump ID #
SCREENING SHEET
FOR SAMPLE DATA
X
0\\
/ 141 1
2. Unit/Process ( /i
3. Plant Name
^.
Mo. Day Yr.
4. Date
11
5. Screener's ID
17
6. Before Tenting
Screening Time" 20
(Military Time)
7 - Before Tenting OVA
Screeniag Value
3 o o o
TLV Screening Value
3 1
8. - Screener's ID
38
9. After Sampling
Screening Time
(Military Time)
10. After -Sampling OVA
Screening Value
TLV Screening
Value
52
Comment 1 I
S3
Comment 2
6 1
B-35
-------
RADIAN
Card 1
SCREENING SHEET
FOR SAMPLE DATA
1. Radian Valve/Pump ID #
O
2. Unit/Process
'0 "*? "7 *\
'^ /-> r.
3. Plant Name
Mo. Day Yr.
4. Date
11
6. Before Tenting
Screening Time
(Military Time)
5. Screener's ID \h\P\lA.
17
7. Before Tenting OVA
Screening Value 2I*
TLV Screening Valu
--3-1-... .
8. Screener's ID I I I
33
9. After Sampling
Screening Time
(Military Time)
10. After Sampling OVA
Screening Value i+5
TLV Screening
Value
52
Comment 1
Comment 2
59
6 1
B-36
-------
WHEELING-PITTSBURGH STEEL
MONESSEN PLANT
B-3 Sample Data
-B-37
-------
RADIAN
UfOlT
Card 1 1
SAMPLE DATA SHEET
/
1. Radian Valve/Pump ID# \&\j \y\A\W)\/\$\ 2. Unit/Process '~J<£' /tV.'/
3. Plant Name /{>/££^/yJ{"4- 7/'773
Mo. Day Yr.
4. Date
6. Time
11
5. Sampler's Initials l-~?i- -I
1 7
(Military Time)
10. Meter #1
11. Time #1
7. Cart ID#
8. N.B.#
9. Page #
''(1V.T. 1 :
12. Meter #2 /
37
14. Temp #1 °F
13. Time #2
15. Temp #2 °F
16. Bar. Press., in. He. I ^1' /_[
5 1
17. AP, in. Hg.
56
6 1
18. DGM Correction!/I -I -l'v
Factor
20. Vol. Org.
Condensate ml 56
21. Coll. time, minutes
19. Meter #
22. Specific Gravity
of Organic
Condensate
75
23. Comment '
78
B-38
.'' N
V
-------
RADIAN
Card 1
SAMPLE DATA SHEET
8
1. Radian Valve/Pump ID# \3\l \f\U\Vt\ iTfr! 2.
3
Unit/Process
3. Plant Name //J — p
Mo. Day Yr.
4. Date
6. Time
(Military Time)
5. Sampler's Initials
1 7
7- Cart ID# Q] 8. N.B.# 9. Page #
10. Meter //I
11. Time #1
25T;
I I |0|
37
14. Temp #1 °F
16. Bar. Press., in. Hg.
5 1
12. Meter #2
13. Time #2
15. Temp #2 °F
1*8
17. AP; in. Hg.
56
18. DGM Correction.
Factor
20. Vol. Org.
Condensate ml
6 1
I I I 10
66
19. Meter #
21. Coll. time, minutes
22. Specific Gravity
of Organic
Condensate
75
23. Comment
78
B-39
-------
Card 1
SAMPLE DATA SHEET
1. Radian Valve/Pump ID// \5\/ \F\U\
3
3. Plant Name
\ 2. Unit/Process
Mo. Dav Yr.
4. Date
6. Time
5. Sampler's Initials
(Milita^ry Ti
1 7
10. Meter #1
7. Cart ID#
12. Meter #2
8. N.B.#
9. Page //
11. Time #1 I I I
37
14. Temp #1 °F
13. Time r/2 I I fe
15. Temp #2 °F
16. Bar. Press., in. Hg. 12^1 f|. lVi$1 17. /\p in. Hg.
C 1 ' O
19. Meter // ~7,
I \/\,\(
s i
18. DGM Correction.
Factor
20. Vol. Org.
Condensate ml 6S
21. Coll. time, minutes
/I- \<3\&\3\
22. Specific Gravity
of Organic
Condensate
75
23. Comment
78
B-40
-------
RADIAN
Card 1
SAMPLE DATA SHEET
1. Radian Valve/Pump ID# \O\/ \P\
-------
RADIAN
Card 1
SAMPLE DATA SHEET
1. Radian Valve/Pump ID# \^)\( \P\lJ\&\i |5 I I . 2. Unit/Process
3. Plant Name
Mo. Day Yr.
4. Date
6. Time
1 I
1
(Military Time)
5. Sampler's Initials ]
7. Cart ID#
1 7
8. N.B.#
9. Page #
10. Meter #1
2 5
12. Meter #2 I ^ 71 ^ . 15V
11. Time #1
0
37
14. Temp #1 °F
13. Time #2
15. Temp #2 °F
17. AP, in. Hg.
I I/I. I*-
56
18. DGM Correction,^
Factor 5 *
/ I. \d\&\3\ 19. Meter # -77 *T£"7 'C
20. Vol. Org.
Condensate ml 65
21. Cell, time, minutes I I I !tol 22. Specific Gravity
71
of Organic
Condensate
75
23. Comment
73
B_42
-------
RADIAN
Card 1
SAMPLE DATA SHEET
1. Radian Valve/Pump ID# \<3\i I P\U^\/ \3\1 \ 2. Unit/Process
3. Plant Name
Mo. Day Yr.
4. Date
6. Time
5. Sampler's Initials
1 7
7. Cart ID#
8. N.B.#
9. Page # _
(Military Time)
10. Meter #1 I/ 16 16 I • I
25
11. Time #1
I I lOi
12. Meter #2 l/t/V'l l-;
13. Time #2
37
14. Temp #1 °F
16. Bar. Press., in. Hg.
/I .
6 1
18. DGM Correction.
Factor
20. Vol. Org.
Condensate ml
21. Coll. time, minutes
15. Temp #2 °F
17. AP, in. Hg.
19. Meter #
A
56
x
22. Specific Gravity I 1
of Organic 75
Condensate
23. Comment
78
fj ?f 7
^ w
B-43
-------
RADIAN
Card 1 1
SAMPLE DATA SHEET
i
1. Radian Valve/Pump ID// \0\ I \T\ti\&\! \S\l\ 2. Unit/Process
3. Plant Name fa)— P
Mo. Day Yr.
4. Date
6. Time
(Military
5. Sampler's Initials
1 7
7. Cart ID//
8. N.B.#
9. Page #
10. Meter #1
11. Time #1
25
37
14. Temp #1 °F I
12. Meter #2
13. Time #2
15. Temp #2 °F
> I 7V+
16. Bar. Press., in. Hg.
51
18.
DGM Correction]/ I- \
Factor
5 1
20. Vol. Org.
Condensate ml ss
I ^1^ 17 AP in Hg
6
56
19. Meter #
21. Coll. time, minutes I I I/1/
71
22. Specific Gravity
of Organic 75
Condensate
23. Comment..
73
B-44
-------
RADIAN
a-
\
Card 1
SAMPLE DATA SHEET
1. Radian Valve/Pump ID# IP/ I/I l/| J0f/'|'I'T V 2. Unit/Process
3. Plant Name
4. Date
£ T i*_,n
Mo.
/l2
11
76}^
Day
<3uV
^
f
Yr. \
.^iL^. 'x 5, Sampler 's/ Initials ' i/'Ui
' 1 7
, \ /
\ / .
•7 r1-— *.Tn>#l/i Q 'TIT " -Q Jt Q TJ^/^rt
(Military Time)
10. Meter //I
11. Time #1
2\8\0\ \OP\
25
37
N 12. /Meter #2
' \ /
fc>. Time #2
14. Temp #1 °F
16. Bar. Press., in. Hg.
A
81
18. DGM Correction.
Factor
20. Vol. Org.
Condensate ml
21. Coll. time/minutes
K I I iff
23.
78
15. x Temp #2 °F
^3^1 . I 61 .PI 17. AP, in. Hg.
56
19. Meter\#
\
22. Specific Gravity LZJ
of Organic \ 7S
Condensate
B-45
-------
RADIAN
Card 1
SAMPLE DATA SHEET
0 l 3>°(
1. Radian Valve/Pump ID# \fl\i \f\U\
2. Unit/Process
3. Plant Name
//-
Mo. Dav Yr.
4. Date
6. Time
5. Sampler's Initials
(Milita\s
1 7
7. Cart ID# \T\ 8. N.B.#
10. Meter #1
11. Time #1
14. Temp #1 °F
25
12. Meter #2 \3\£\'?\ • \£\
1*5
13. Time #
15. Temp #2 °F
1+8
9. Page #
16. Bar. Press., in. He. 12.171 . J5"|dl 17. APS in. Hg.
1
01,1?
56
18. DGM Correction.
/I.
Factor
20. Vol. Org.
6 1
19. Meter #
Condensate ml 66
21. Coll. time, minutes
I I 171
71
22. Specific Gravity
of Organic
Condensate
75
23. Comment'
78
B-46
-------
RADIAN
Card 1 I 1 Isl
SAMPLE DATA SHEET
1. Radian Valve/Pump ID# |Ql/ I ?\U Ug-j / I *fi / i 2. Unit/Process
3. Plant Name
Mo. Day Yr.
4. Date
6. Time
11
(Military Time)
10. Meter #1
11. Time #1
4\Z\3\. ]
25
ICJ
37
14. Temp #1 °F
"tS
16. Bar. Press., in. Hg.
18. DGM Correction! l\+\
Factor l
20. Vol. Org.
Condensate ml
66
21. Coll. time, minutes
23. Comment I
78
5. Sampler's Initials
7. Cart ID# [7] 8. N.B.#
1 7
9. Page # _
12. Meter #2
13. Time #2
15. Temp #2 °F
• &V\ 17. AP, in. Hg.
I 19. Meter #
I
I/I-
I/
56
r^°" i^3** "*^ -O
53 f Z
I I I I 22. Specific Gravity I. Ill
of Organic
Condensate
75
B-47
-------
Card 1
SAMPLE DATA SHEET
1. Radian Vaiye/Pump ID# \&\' I ftl-1\£^/'\ MS- 2. Unit/Process CJ,^L?
3. Plant Name
Mo. Day Yr.
4. Date
6. Time
11
20
(Military Time)
5. Sampler's/Initials
1 7
7- Cart
ID# (HI 8. N.B.i
/ 2V
9. Page #
10. Meter #1 I I I I i I
2 5
12., Meter #2
11. Time #1
13. Time #2
14. Temp #1 °F I I I
16. Bar. Press., in. Hg.
5 Y
6 1
18. DGM Correction] /L I £A<1 \S
Factor
20. Vol. Org.
Condensate ml S6
15. Temp #2 °F
18
17. AP, in. Hg.
19. Meter # '.
1 1
1 1
56
21. Coll. time', minutes I I I I I 22. Specific Gravity
71 of Organic 75
Condensate
23. Comment
78
B-48
-------
WHEELING-PITTSBURGH STEEL
MONESSEN PLANT
B-4 Analysis Data
B-49
-------
1. Radian Valve/Pump ID#
ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
(AMBIENT AND BAG)
2. Unit/Process
Plant
3. Plant Name
U N Vv c Q \ o (vi
Mo. Day Yr."
4. Date
\ 13-
11
Q4 *5|0
6. Time (Military) J j ^| :
20
77 9/\ \/~
9 . Ins trument f~)i 1 V6 'A . )Lj 1 C_
6
^|C»
TUG |
T5T
5. Analyst's Initials C-J--
J 1 \~"-
17
7. N.B. # 8. Page #
AMBIENT AIR
Component Code
ppmw
, 5
£*rr*i
3cn
BAG SAMPLE
Component Code
28
46
64
Card 2 j 2 | A | Duplicate columns 3 through 10 from Card 1
1
ppmw
14
6.
Component Code
50
37
55
73
23
41
^J?5
59
Remarks:
\ C C
B-50
V
-------
ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
(AMBIENT AND BAG)
1. Radian Valve/Pump ID# |Q| \ I V I A |Q|Q| / |8 I 2. Unit/Process ^
3. Plant NaneV.C\\U\\ r\ci
_
Mo . Dav Yr .
4. Date
V
11
6. Time (Military)
9. Instrument
5. Analyst's Initials [p | UJ
17
7. N.B. #
> r\ "
AMBIENT AIR
Component Code
BAG SAMPLE
Component Code
1.
2.
3.
Card
Compc
4.
5.
6.
C| H2-!
25
1 1
43
1 1
61
2
snent
2 ! A
1
Code
1 1
11
1 1
29
1 I
47
Di
\Z\ fl^l.
28
Mil
46
III!
8
64
iplicate columns 3
ppmv
MM
14
Ml!
32
MM
50
through 10 i
Corai
oh 12.
34
|
52
1
r-
70
from Card 1
jonent Code
1
20
1
38
r |
56
\z
37
1
712 1 .
|
L
55
|
73
1
|
"V
ppmw
|
23
|
41
|
59
|
|
s
V
Remarks:
B-51
-------
ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
(AMBIENT AND BAG)
O S €>
P LC
1. Radian Valve/Pump ID#
3. Plant Name
Oil
2. Unit/Process
Mo . Day
¥7
4. Date
a.
0|^
so
11
6. Time (Military)
9. Ins trumenttX(Q'
5. Analyst's Initials
7. N.B. #
TC
()
AMBIENT AIR
Component Code
ppmw
BAG SAMPLE
Component Code
ppmw
1 IIZTIZl i
\°
37
55
73
ppmw
23
41
6.
59
Remarks:
B-52
-------
ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
(AMBIENT AND BAG)
X. O °l 9
P U.
1. Radian Valve/Pump ID#
3. Plant Name
Mo. Day
Vr.
4. Date
6. Time
(Military)
20
9. Instrument
24
2. Unit/Process
G4a
5. Analyst's Initials
7. N.B. #
AMBIENT AIR
Component Code
ppmw
BAG 'SAMPLE
Component Code
2 i A Duplicate columns 3 through 10 from Card 1
5.
6.
37
55
73
23
41
59
!9f6lSl'-/
ppmw
Remarks:
B-53
-------
ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
(AMBIENT AND BAG)
P
1. Radian Valve/Pump ID#
3. Plant Namaj
Oil
" 2. Unit/Process
Mo. Day
4. Date
112-
Oi -3 &I6)
_
ll
6. Time (Military) f (
9. InstrumentPumiX
5. Analyst's Initials
7- N.B. #
20
-- ~" — ' - —
3QJC ( (4C | I |
24
AMBIENT AIR
Component Code
ppmw
BAG SAMPLE
Component Code
1.
2.
3.
Card
Compc
4.
5.
Wft
25
i
43
61
2
1
raent
2 |A
1
Code
| |
11
| |
29
e. nnn
Dx
\£\°l
ti
28
|
46
1
64
iplicate columns 3
ppmw
14
32
|
I 1
3
3
L.-T.U
through 10 j
Com]
Vtfi*
34
1
52
|
70
:rom Card 1
jonent Code
|
20
1
38
tfltf
U
I^I^I^I^IO
37
1 1 1 1 1
55
1 1 1 1 1
73
ppmw
Mil!
23
111 1
41
I 1411 OlC
47
50
56
59
Remarks:
B-54
-------
ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
(AMBIENT AND BAG)
P (A / * '•
1. Radian Valve/Pump ID//
2. Unit/Process
3. Plant NameVAJ
Mo. Day
B:
4. Date
11
6. Time (Military)
9. Instrumen
5, Analyst's Initials
7. N.B. #
20 -
24
AMBIENT AIR
Component Code
BAG SAMPLE
Component Code
2 | A Duplicate columns 3 through AKT'from Card 1
59
Remarks:
B-55
-------
ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
(AMBIENT AND BAG)
1. Radian Valve/Pump ID#
Ql
3. Plant Nam ((\lSL\ fl ft
l (1(\l
2. Unit/Process
Mo . Day Yr\
4. Date ( |7_ .$1*3 % |O
11 . ____
6. Time (Military) '\||^|4-|C
2CT
9. Instrumental vTGVv A_)\ V_ I
u
5. Analyst's Initials C_fJ^) | (^
17
7. N.B. # 8. Page #
RC i
24
AMBIENT AIR
Component Code
28
46
64
pprow
BAG SAMPLE
Component Code
70
2 i A | Duplicate columns 3 through 10 from Card 1
ppmw
Component Code
37
55
73
14
32
J2l2
50
6730
1 1
20
1 I
38
3| ?! #
1 ! 1
23
1 1 1
41
I 1*71 0
56
59
Remarks:
B-56
-------
1. Radian Valve/Pump ID//
ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
(AMBIENT AND BAG)
P U, 0
0\\
11 2. Unit/Process
(obz
3. Plant Name VjJJViULl \<\& T\\\S * S>Wl
Mo. Day
4. Date
I 12.01
11
6. Time (Military)
9. Instrument
5. Analyst's Initials
7. N.B. #
AMBIENT AIR
Component Code
1.
ppmw
28
46
3
BAG SAMPLE
Component Code
64
Card 2 2 ! A [ Duplicate columns 3 through 10 from Card 1
1
ppmv
14
32
50
37
55
73
23
41
59
ppmw
Remarks:
B-57
-------
ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
(AMBIENT AND BAG)
1. Radian Valve/Pump ID#
3. Plant Name
1 !"3|! 2. Unit/Process
Mo. Day
«%.
4. Date
6
11
6. Time (Military)
9. Ins trument. OU'
5. Analyst's Initials
7. H.B.
14
AMBIENT AIR
Component Code
BAG SAMPLE
47
50
Remarks:
B-58
-------
ANALYSIS DATA" SHEET
(AMBIENT AND BAG)
1. Radian Valve/Pump ID* \(\ \) | 7S*4 10) V f3lT| 2. Unit/Process C^ksL
3
3'. Plant Name
/ ihcs \fpj? r
Mo. Day
4. Date
Z
15
11
6. Time (Military)
9. Instrument
5. Analyst's Initials Cj
7. N.B. #
AMBIENT AIR
Component Code
1.
pprow
II I . I Bl S
V
3
BAG SAMPLE
Component Code
28
fRI/1513
13
37
46
55
64
73
Card 2 2 ! AJ Duplicate columns 3 through 10 from Card 1
Component Code
ppmw
14
23
32
41
1 1
1 1 1
50
59
Remarks:
B-59
-------
ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
(AMBIENT AND BAG)
Pu
1. Radian Valve/Pump ID# Q| i
3. Plant Name
•4. Date
\A&- '\Pl Vr~ . S'\'-g '
11
6. Time (Military) C \ 15
^^j?n
9. Instrument
TWC
~K
2. Unit/Process
C
5. Analyst's Initials
7. N.B. #
17
8. Page
a v\r
AMBIENT AIR
Component Code
ppmw
n ,
1 1 1
BAG SAMPLE
Component Code
28
-UB*-
TC'V
46
!
i
64
Card 2 I 2 | A | Duplicate columns 3 through 10 from Card 1
1
Component Code ppmw Component Code
yxr-m&f /K
&?><{'&)
3<^£>
^ 2.3 ^ -3 O
55
73
4.
5.
6.
! i
11
1 1
29
inn
47
| |
!
14
I |
32
1
!/ IQIOIO
50
20
1 1
38
$ri8"i^
56
M M 1
23
M M 1
41
I Sl.51 O 0| d
59
Remarks:
B-60
-------
-fil
].. Radian Valve
ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
(AMBIENT AND BAG)
U.
ftiv I>I*JQI
2. Unit/Process
PWrxV
3. Plant Name
\QWjLVvHA & Y v^b •
Mo. Dav
4. Date
V 13?
11
6. Time (Military)
9. Instrument
5. Analyst's Initials"
7. N.B. #
AMBIENT AIR
Component Code
ppmw
1.
2.
3.
O
25
43
61
1
•2.
|
28
1
46
I
64
'BAG SAMPLE
/
Component Code
Card 2 ! 2 ; A! Duplicate columns 3 through 10 from Card 1
1
ppmw
14.
32
50
\ 19
37
55
23
41
59
Remarks:
B-61
-------
ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
(AMBIENT AND BAG)
VI
1. Radian Valve/Pump ID#
3. Plant Name
6 II Iv HfelOl i 131^1 2. Unit/Process (?C b- T\ d ii
Mo. Day Yr.
4. Date
11
6. Time (Military)/] I I I I I 10
5. Analyst's Initials
7. N.B. #
9. Ins trument Ha if.". A. J*C t C I
5
AMBIENT AIR
Component Code
ppmw
BAG SAMPLE
Component Code
Card 2 2 j A Duplicate columns 3 through 10 from Card 1
37
55
73
23
41
nO'/d
50
56
59
Remarks:
B-62
-------
1 A
ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
(AMBIENT AND BAG)
——x5 H /"* • i "^i i
1. Radian Valve/Pump ID* 0 U | V K |ff| I |?5l^/ 2. Unit/Process Cj;K^ flat\r
3. Plant Name 11 •
4. Date
Mo. Day Yr.
\
V
11
6. Time (Military) ^ jl I UQ D
..20 .._
5. Analyst's Initials
7. N.B. #
9. Instrument
24
AMBIENT AIR
Component Code
pprnw
BAG SAMPLE
Component Code
Card 2 2 | A | Duplicate columns 3 through 10 from Card 1
37
55
73
ppmw
23
41
47
50
56
59
30
Remarks:
B-63
n-
-------
ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
(AMBIENT AND BAG)
y u. gr / 3'
1. Radian Valve/Pump ID#
3. Plant
4. Data
2. Unit/Process
Cob PU-t-
Mo . Day
Yr .
11
6. Time (Military)
9. Instrument
5. Analyst's Initials
7. N.B.
AMBIENT AIR
Component Code
1.
2.
BAG SAMPLE
Component Code
46
64
Card 2 [ 2 I A Duplicate columns 3 through 10 from Card 1
1
Component Code
ppmw
4.
6.
[ |
11
29
in R
i
14
1 1
32
V 2|0
Component Code
37
55
73
pprnw
47
50
1 1
20
1 1
38
Si£i*
MM!
23
| | | | |
41
I / -\J4 \ 0\ 0\0
56
59
Remarks:
B-64
-------
1 I A
ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
(AMBIENT AND BAG)
9 a 0 139
O
1. Radian Valve/Pump ID#
3. Plant Name l()K-^Ui'f\& "PfH S>- *
Mo. Day tr.
4. Date
2. Unit/Process
\ izQirp|SiC
11
6. Time (Military)
9. Instrument
5. Analyst's Initials
7. N.B. #
24
AMBIENT AIR
Gomtjonent Code
ppmv
BAG SAMPLE
Component Code
Card 2 2 j A I Duplicate columns 3 through 10 from Card 1
\\~3\-\ \°\\0
37
12826
55
73
ppmw
5.
23
41
59
Remarks:
B-65
-------
1. Radian Valve/Pump ID#
2. Plant
4. Date
ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
(AMBIENT AND BAG)
P U. d> i 3 c)
9. InstrumenttiP 5150
24
6. Time (Military) (^ I I I H I O
5. Analyst's Initials
7- N.B.
AMBIENT AIR
Component Code
ppinw
- \Jo\5
28
46
BAG SAMPLE
Component Code
64
Card 2 |__2 | A | Duplicate columns 3 through 10 from Card 1
1
ppmw
14
32
50
37
55
73
23
41
59
ppns?
Remarks:
B-66
-------
ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
(AMBIENT AND BAG)
1. Radian Valve/Pump ID* Q| \
1 1*+ I I
2. Unit/Process
V(n
i ( q.
3. Plant NameL(JlUL(! 1 (rtG T '"fe S-L' o_ |
Mo. Day Yt.
4. Date
11
6. Time (Military)
9. Instrument
n^
01 5
S|O
5. Analyst's Initials
7. N.B. #
24
AMBIENT AIR
Component—6o4e
ppmw /
BAG SAMPLE
Component Code
2 ! A i Duplicate columns 3 through 10 from Card 1
B-67
37
55
73
23
41
59
ppmw
r ac-
b
Remarks:
-------
ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
(AMBIENT AND BAG)
X
1. Radian Valve/Pump ID* ICl I I^H^cf^l 1 Kf I /I 2. Unit/Process G? JCiL V JC
__ *
3. Plant Name
4. Date
. SW
,r ^" ..^
6. Time (Military) \1 |^L| 1 \(o\ }
5, Analyst's Initials
7. N.B.
>. Instrument UP
AMBIENT AIR
Comuonent Code
ppmv
BAG SAMPLE
Component Code
Card 2 I 2 : A Duplicate columns 3 through 10 from Card 1
37
55
73
ppmw
23
41
50
56
2.2.^
59
Remarks:
B-68
-------
ANALYSIS OF LINE SAMPLES AT UNIT 1
tri
Sample Source Weight % Benzene
Scrubber "A" 39.4
Scrubber "B" 0.97
Rectifier Bottoms 85.1
Light Oil Product 77.3
-------
WHEELING-PITTSBURGH STEEL
MONESSEN PLANT
B-5 OVA and TLV Calibration Data
B-70
-------
f'*
CALIBRATION CHECKING FORM
T
d
o
i »
l|l-
\
1
]
\
1
\
I
i
1
1
3.
2
'I
1
143-
J
fr
2,4
^l6
'2-1^
D 1 1
OH
C |2
0|2
o,3
^H*-
|
1
Instrument!
1
i
i.
.4
•2.
g
4
-?
4
...{-,
to
a
•rl
d
0)
01 0
M id
U 0)
0|i
0
0
6
o
0
I
\
1
I
\
0|l
o
\
/"'I '
/.-1
\
Low standard
ppm calibration
,
,
1
i i
i i
i i
i
r i i i4io
i
i
i
i i
1 IS 10
i i
1 1 1216
i
i
i
i i
i i
i i
O
High standard
ppm calibration
il
1 1510
1 1610
0|O
0 | 0
1 ifcl'^IOlO
1 . 1 i 14""
'D|O
1 ISIOloIr,
Z Z o o
i i "? 1 1 L-
| ITE^I V>
1 IS |6
, ,i ,9
III
I" 1 1
^; \<^>
0|G
0|C
1
1
' i i r'i i
Dilution Probe
Calibration
•
--
- -
(31510
n o' o
1\& O
.... - — -
1 ^A '-^ | I — x
1
'|5 Z|0
1 -
1
Comment a:
-------
—N
CALIBRATION CHECKING FORM
td
43
4-1
CJ
1 *
\ \1
\ 1 ^™)
1 1 f*->
1 p.
1
1
\
\
1
1
1
rt
0|4
0
4
o,S
0
5
Instrument
}3
4
i
4
>
Screening
Team
0\\
0\(
0| I
0| I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Low standard
ppm calibration
1 1
1
1 1 Iklo
1 1
' 1 1
i 1 1
1 1
1 1-
1 1
1 1 1
1 1
1 1 1
-,,'
1*1 O
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
High standard
ppm calibration
14
I ikiaie?
Ii *^~)
\ s
\ i«
I. M
I I
I I
i i
i i
I I
i i
i i
41 o
5
37
0
r
5
o
o
o
Q
\
Dilution Probe
Calibration
?n
1 1 1151-10
i i i4m^
1 1 /|2|0|C>
1 1 \1\o\<>
ill i i
i i i i i
i i i i i
i i'i i i
i i i i i-
i -i i i i
i i i i i
Coramenta:
2: RADIAL '^o. 438Q
logo
-------
WHEELING-PITTSBURGH STEEL
MONESSEN PLANT
B-6 Dry Gas Meter Calibration Data
B-73
-------
RADBAN
SAMPLE DATA SHEET
1. Radian Valve/Pump ID# I I 1 I I I I I i 2. Unit/Process
3
3. Plant Name
Mo. Day Yr.
4. Date
6. Time
/ iz,
11
5. Sampler's Initials l^VJj
1 7
o n
(Military Time)
10. Meter
11. Time #1
25
14. Temp //I °F
7. Cart ID?/
12. Meter #2
13. Time #2
15. Temp #2 °F
8. N.B.#
!. rt
1+8
16. Bar. Press., in. Es.^\T\ • 1
-------
WHEELING-PITTSBURGH STEEL
MONESSEN PLANT
B-7 Accuracy Check Data
B-75
-------
'.^ANALYSIS/ DATA SHEET
(AMBIENT AND BAG)
1 I A
1
Radian Valve/Pump ID#
C I A C O o o \
rf (1 / z o ; $ o /
ALO iii, \"^\^~\ ,_..i
-------
ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
(AMBIENT AND BAG)
1. Radian Valve/Pump ID*
Q | o | o | 2
2. Unit/Process
3. Plant Name [.0 JVg.l i i\ ^ ' V i
Mo. Day Tr.
4. Date
\
0| 3'
11
6. Time (Military)
9. Instrument
5. Analyst's Initials
7. N.B.
20
5C\CT\-\C
''-' n T
AMBIENT AIR
Component Code
ppnnj
BAG SAMPLE
Component Code
I A ! Duplicate columns 3 through 10 from Card 1
B-77
37
55
73
23
41
59
ppmw
Remarks: > )( ^
T7T
-------
ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
(AMBIENT AND BAG)
n 9 0-2-
/ Z
1. Radian Valve/Pump ID#
3. Plant Name
- c o
|;3
2. Unit/Process
Mo. Day Yf.
4. Date
/\Z-
11
6. Time (Military) t\7\O\O
5. Analyst's Initials
7- N.B. #
9. Instrument
AMBIENT AIR
Component Code
ppmw
BAG SAMPLE
Component Code
2 ; A Duplicate columns 3 through 10 from Card 1
7\
3\.
37
55
73
ppmj
23
41
50
B-78
56
59
Remarks:
77 3
-------
ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
(AMBIENT AND BAG)
-f—i..- ) 7' &—^—f
1. Radian Valve/Pump ID#
3. Plant Name /
k. Date
O | I
o o a
2. Unit/Process
~£.'7~7?;/fyff£
Mo . Day Yr .
11
6. Time (Military) / |-- | O\O
20
9. Instrument '—.^ ^"~':"-'^ 3^
5. Analyst's Initials
7. N.B. #
24
AMBIENT AIR
Component Code
ppmr
BAG SAMPLE
Component Code
Card 2 " 2 ; A Duplicate columns 3 through 10 from Card 1
1 /I/
!-• 1
K-
37
55
73
23
6.
B-79
59
Remarks:
-------
It/
Card 1
1. Radian Valve/Pump ID#
SAMPLE DATA SHEET
01 A C o o o
c i-
I M °!-/2. Unit/Process C&K&
3. Plant Name
Mo. Day
4. Date
6. Time
Yr.
(Military Time)
5. Sampler's Initials \Dt^\
1 7
7. Cart ID# IM 8. N.B.#
9. Page #
10. Meter #1
25
12. Meter #2
11. Time #1
37
13. Time
14. Temp #1 °F
"tS
15. Temp #2 °F
16. Bar. Press., in. He. I'Zffi. i
18. DGM Correction.
Factor
20. Vol. Org.
Condensate ml 6S
17. AP, in. Hg.
56
19. Meter //
21. Coll. time, minutes
22. Specific Gravity
of Organic 7S
Condensate
23. Comment
78
B-80
-------
RADIAN
Card 1 1
SAMPLE DATA SHEET
O I A C O O O 2.
1. Radian Valve/Pump ID# \f\ \C\\\ ^ C | ^ | ^ |^-ri 2. Unit/Process C.O/
-------
RADIAN
Card 1
SAMPLE DATA SHEET
1.
3.
1 o i A c o c ~ :i
Radian Valve/Pump ID#
Unit /Process
>. ,,
^ .e'fCL. I /
Plant Name LU/\juJ 'HG Pi /A , ^JtJL I
~~ -
Mo. Day Yr.
4. Date
i. Time
5. Sampler's Initials I 1/3
1 7
7. Cart ID//
(Military Time)
10. Meter #1
11. Time #1
14. Temp #1 °F
12. Meter #2
13. Time #2
8. N.B.# 9. Page it _
101.73 ,.77/7
15. Temp #2 °F
/
/
16. Bar. Press., in. Hg.
56
6 1
18. DGM Correction.
Factor
20. Vol. Org.
Ccndensate ml 5S
21. Coll. time, minutes
17. AP, in. Hg.
19. Meter # "7/ J 5 / 3-
22«, Sp'ecific Gravity
•t of Organic
*Condensate
75
23. Comment I
78
O.OL
7,
7.
B-82
-7.45
•a? it-.
-------
RADIAN
Card 1
SAMPLE DATA SHEET
C O C
1. Radian Valve/Pump ID#
3. Plant Name
'U? I/l^r^. Unit/Process
Mo. Day Yr.
4. Date
6. Time
(Military Time)
10. Meter //I
5. Sampler's Initials
1 7
7. Cart ID# I/ I 8. N.B.#
9. Page #
25
11. Time
14. Temp #1
37
45
16. Bar. Press., in. Eg.
5 1
18. DGM Correction]/^ I.
Factor 6:
20. Vol. Org.
Condensate ml
12. Meter #2
13.^ Time #2
15. Temp #2 °F
I
17- AP, in. Hg.
19. Meter #
I
56
21. Coll. time, minutes | ^—\~'
71
22. Specific Gravity I
of Organic 75
Condensate
23. Comment
78
B-83
7. -
-------
"3
\^
ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
(AMBIENT AND BAG)
1 A
1. Radian Valve/Pump ID#
V A
2. Unit/Process
3. Plant Name j',L Ml".ELlA,^c
Mo. Day Yr.
4. Date
& E- L.
Uc-i
_
TT
6. Time (Military)
5. Analyst's Initials j C_.| ^ [ 6
7. N.B. #
17
8. Page #_
9. Instrument K t-,-- P. 50 \ C TtAC. \
AMBIENT AIR
Component Code
1.
ppnm-
28
46
BAG SAMPLE
Component Code
64
Card 2 | 2 ! A Duplicate columns 3 through 10 from Card 1
"" '
ppmw
14
32
6.
50
B-84
37
55
73
23
41
59
ppmw
Remarks:
X X
,> -i'
I'Z
I (3
X
------- |