&EFK
           United States
           Environmental Protection
           Agency
           Office of Air Quality
           Planning and Standards
           Research Triangle Park NC 27711
EMB Report 80-IBR-6
March 1980
           Air
Industrial Boilers

Emission Test Report
Rickenbacker Air Force
Base
Columbus,
           VOLUME I:
           Summary of Results

-------
       CONTINUOUS SULFUR DIOXIDE MONITORING OF
            THE INDUSTRIAL BOILER SYSTEM AT
             RICKENBACKER AIR FORCE BASE,
                    COLUMBUS, OHIO
                       VOLUME I
                        by
                    S. J. Howie
             PEDCo Environmental,  Inc.
                11499 Chester Road
              Cincinnati, Ohio  45246
              Contract No. 68-02-2811
              Work Assignment No. 27
                    PN 3333-AA
                 Technical Manager

                   Winton Kelly
            Emission Measurement Branch
       U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
EMISSION STANDARDS AND ENGINEERING DIVISION, OAQPS
   RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NORTH CAROLINA  27711

                     June 1980

-------
                           DISCLAIMER





     This report  has been reviewed by  the  Emission Measurement



Branch  Emission  Standards and  Engineering Division, Office  of



Air Quality  Planning and Standards,  U.S.  Environmental  Protec-



tion Agency,  and approved  for  publication.  Approval does  not



signify  that the  contents  necessarily reflect  the views  and



policies of  the  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, nor does



mention  of  trade names  or  commercial  products constitute  en-



dorsement or recommendation for use.
                               ii

-------
                            CONTENTS
Figures                                                      iv
Tables                                                        v
Acknowledgment                                                x

1    Introduction                                           1-1

2    Summary of Results                                     2-1

3    Results                                                3-1

     3.1  Performance specification tests                   3-1
     3.2  Continuous sulfur dioxide data                    3-38
     3.3  Data capture and loss                             3-45
     3.4  Quality assurance                                 3-53
     3.5  Particulate and NO  results                       3-76
                            J\.

4    Process Description                                    4-1

     4.1  Physical plant                                    4-1
     4.2  Background information                            4-5
     4.3  Process control during test                       4-5

5    Continuous Emission Monitoring System Description      5-1

     5.1  Sampling interface                                5-1
     5.2  S02 monitor                                       5-4
     5.3  02 monitor                                        5-4
     5.4  Recorders                                         5-5
     5.5  Calibration system                                5-5

6    Procedures and calculations                            6-1

     6.1  Continuous S02 data computations                  6-1
     6.2  Performance specification testing                 6-5
     6.3  Determination of factors accounting for data
            capture and loss periods                        6-13
     6.4  Quality assurance                                 6-15
     6.5  Determination of CEM output in the field          6-18
     6.6  Determination of particulate and NO
           concentrations                                   6-19

Appendix  Calibration gas certification and FGD
            information                                     A-l

                              iii

-------
                             FIGURES

Number                                                      Page
3-1       Scrubber Inlet Sampling Locations     .            3-6
3-2       Scrubber Outlet Sampling Locations                3-7
4-1       R-C/Bahco Scrubbing System Flow Diagram            4-4
5-1       Sampling Locations After Modifications            5-2
5-2       Simplified Schematic of CEM                       5-3
6-1       Sample Data Sheet and Equations for the
            Determination of Calibration Error              6-7
6-2       Sample Data Sheet and Equations for Deter-
            mination of System Response Time                6-9
6-3       Sample Data Sheet and Equations for Deter-
            mination of 2-hour Zero and Calibration Drift   6-10
6-4       Sample Data Sheet and Equations for Deter-
            mination of 24-hour Zero and Calibration Drift  6-12
6-5       Sample Data Sheet and Equations for Deter-
            mination of System Relative Accuracy            6-14
                               IV

-------
                             TABLES


Number

3-1       Summary of Initial Performance Specification
            Results for the S02 Monitor                     3-2

3-2       Summary of Initial Performance Specification
            Results for the O2 Monitor                      3-3

3-3       Summary of Final Performance Specification
            Results for the S02 Monitor                     3-4

3-4       Summary of Final Performance Specification
            Results for the 02 Monitor                      3-5

3-5       Initial Test Results for Low-Range (Outlet)
            S02 Monitor Calibration Error                   3-10

3-6       Intial Test Results for High-Range (Inlet)
            S02 Monitor Calibration Error                   3-11

3-7       Initial Test Results for 02 Monitor Calibration
            Error                                           3-12

3-8       Initial Test Results for Low-Range (Outlet)
            Monitor 2-Hour Zero and Calibration Drift       3-13

3-9       Initial Test Results for High-Range (Inlet)
            S02 Monitor 2-Hour Zero and Calibration Drift   3-14

3-10      Initial Test Results for O2 Monitor 24-Hour
            Zero and Calibration Drift                      3-15

3-11      Initial Test Results for Low-Range (Outlet)
            S02 Monitor 24-Hour Zero and Calibration
            Drift                                           3-17

3-12      Initial Test Results for High-Range (Inlet)
            S02 Monitor 24-Hour Zero and Calibration Drift  3-18

3-13      Initial Test Results for 02 Monitor 24-Hour
            Zero and Calibration Drift                      3-19

-------
                       TABLES (continued)


Number                                                      Page

3-14      Test Results for Low-Range (Outlet)  S02
            Monitor Response Time                           3-20

3-15      Test Results for High-Range (Inlet)  S02  Monitor
            Response Time                                   3-21

3-16      Test Results for 02 Monitor Response Time         3-22

3-17      Initial Test Results for Scrubber Inlet
            Certification                                   3-24

3-18      Initial Test Results for Scrubber Outlet
            Certification                                   3-25

3-19      Final Test Results for Low-Range (Outlet) S02
            Monitor Calibration Error                       3-26

3-20      Final Test Results for High-Range (Inlet) S02
            Monitor Calibration Error                       3-27

3-21      Final Test Results for O2 Monitor Calibration
            Error                                           3-28

3-22      Final Tests Results for Low-Range (Outlet) So2
            Monitor 2-Hour Zero and Calibration Drift       3-30

3-23      Final Test Results for High-Range (Inlet) SO2
            Monitor 2-Hour Zero and Calibration Drift       3-31

3-24      Final Test Results for 02 Monitor 2-Hour Zero
            and Calibration Drift                           3-32

3-25      Final Test Results for Low-Range (Outlet) S02
            Monitor 24-Hour Zero and Calibration Drift      3-33

3-26      Final Test Results for High-Range (Inlet) S02
            Monitor 24-Hour Zero and Calibration Drift      3-34

3-27      Final Test Results for 02 2-Hour Zero and
            Calibration Drift                               3-35

3-28      Final Test Results for Scrubber Inlet
            Certification                                   3-36

3-29      Final Test Results for Scrubber Outlet
            Certification                                   3-37
                               VI

-------
                       TABLES (continued)


Number                                                      Page

3-30      Summary of Results Using 1-Hour  Averages,
            January 25 to March 1,  1980                     3-39

3-31      Summary of Results Using 1-Hour  Averages,
            March 2 to March 19,  1980                       3-40

3-32      Summary of Results Using 24-Hour Averages,
            January 25 to March 1,  1980                     3-42

3-33      Summary of Results Using 24-Hour Averages,
            March 2 to March 19,  1980                       3-43

3-34      Daily Data Capture and Loss                       3-46

3-35      Summary of Process and CEM Operations During
            Test                                            3-50

3-36      Inlet Data Loss                                   3-51

3-37      Outlet Data Loss                                  3-52

3-38      Summary of Weekly QA Test Results for 24-Hour
            Zero and Calibration Drift                      3-55

3-39      QA Test Results for Low-Range (Outlet) SOj
            Monitor 24-Hour Zero and Calibration Drift,
            February 7 through 14                           3-56

3-40      QA Test Results for Low-Range (Outlet) S02
            Monitor 24-Hour Zero and Calibration Drift,
            February 14 through 21                          3-57

3-41      QA Test Results for Low-Range (Outlet) S02
            Monitor 24-Hour Zero and Calibration Drift,
            February 21 through 28                          3-58

3-42      QA Test Results for Low-Range (Outlet) S02
            Monitor 24-Hour Zero and Calibration Drift,
            February 28 through March 6                     3-59
3-43      QA Test Results for Low-Range (Outlet)
            Monitor 24-Hour Zero and Calibration Drift,
            March 6 through March 13                        3-60

3-44      QA Test Results for High-Range (Inlet) SO2
            Monitor 24-Hour Zero and Calibration Drift,
            February 7 through 14                           3-61
                               VI1

-------
                       TABLES (continued)


Number                                                      Page

3-45      QA Test Results for High-Range (Inlet)  S02
            Monitor 24-Hour Zero and Calibration  Drift,
            February 14 through 21                          3-62

3-46      QA Test Results for High-Range (Inlet)  S02
            Monitor 24-Hour Zero and Calibration  Drift,
            February 21 through 28                          3-63

3-47      QA Test Results for High-Range (Inlet)  S02
            Monitor 24-Hour Zero and Calibration  Drift,
            February 28 through March 6                     3-64

3-48      QA Test Results for High-Range (Inlet)  S02
            Monitor 24-Hour Zero and Calibration  Drift,
            March 6 through March 13                        3-65

3-49      QA Test Results for O2 Monitor 24-Hour  Zero
            and Calibration Drift, January 31 through
            February 7                                      3-66

3-50      QA Test Results for O2 Monitor 24-Hour  Zero
            and Calibration Drift, February 7 through 14    3-67

3-51      QA Test Results for O2 Monitor 24-Hour  Zero
            and Calibration Drift, February 14 through 21   3-68

3-52      QA Test Results for 02 Monitor 24-Hour  Zero
            and Calibration Drift, February 21 through 28   3-69

3-53      QA Test Results for 02 Monitor 24-Hour  Zero and
            Calibration Drift, February 28 through March 6  3-70

3-54      QA Test Results for O2 Monitor 24-Hour  Zero
            and Calibration Drift, March 6 through 13       3-71

3-55      QA Test Results for System Relative Accuracy      3-72

3-56      Summary of QA Test Results for System Relative
            Accuracy                                        3-74

3-57      QA Moisture Data for Use with CEM Results         3-75

3-58      Particulate Test Results                          3-77
                               viii

-------
                       TABLES (continued)


Number                                                      Page

3-59      Nitrogen Oxide Test Results                       3-78

4-1       Process Information for Rickenbacker Air
            Force Base                                      4-2

4-2       Assays of Coal Delivered and Burned from
            January 16 to March 19                          4-7
                               ix

-------
                         ACKNOWLEDGMENT

     This  report  was  prepared for  the  Emission  Measurement
Branch, Emission  Standards  and Engineering Division,  Office  of
Air Quality  Planning and Standards, U.S.  Environmental  Protec-
tion Agency.  Mr. Winton Kelly was the Technical Manager.  PEDCo
Environmental,  Inc.,  appreciates  the direction  and  review  of
procedures and data that he provided.
     Mr. William  G.  Dewees served  as  PEDCo's  Project Director;
Mr. Anthony  S.  Wisbith  and  Mr. Stephen J.  Howie served as joint
Project  Managers.   Mr.  Howie  supervised  field operations  and
data analysis  and was the principal author of the report.  Mr.
Richard L. Campbell  and Mr.  Robert M.  Livingston provided tech-
nical and analytical support.

-------
                            SECTION 1



                          INTRODUCTION





     The primary purpose of  this  test was to collect continuous



sulfur dioxide  (S02)  emission and removal efficiency  data from



the flue gas desulfurization (FGD) system serving the industrial



boiler system at Rickenbacker Air Force Base  (RAFB),  near Colum-



bus, Ohio.*  The data are to be used to support development of a



new source performance standard for industrial boilers.



     Because  the continuous  emission  monitoring system  (CEM)



used gas monitors to collect the data, performance specification



(P/S)  tests  were conducted  at the  beginning and  end  of clata



collection  to  ensure equivalence  to  manual reference  tests.



Additional reference  testing was performed  throughout the test



period to provide quality assurance.



     Manual  tests   for  nitrogen  oxides (NO  ) and  particuleites
                                            X


were  performed  to  determine  what,   if any,  removal  of  these



pollutants occurred in the FGD system.



     Records  of boiler,  FGD system,  and CEM performance were



kept to account for data loss and excursions from normal opera-



tions, and to provide information regarding operating parameters



for correlation with data.
* Since the test, the base was transfered to the National Guard

  and renamed Rickenbacker Air National Guard Base (RANGE).



                               1-1

-------
     Volume I  of this report presents the results  of all  tests
performed  and provides  background  information  concerning  the
process,  equipment,  and  procedures  relevant  to  the  tests.
Volume(s) II,  III,  and  IV provide(s) detailed listings, instru-
ment calibration  logs,  field test data, and  process  logs  rele-
vant to the results presented in Volume I.
                               1-2

-------
                            SECTION 2
                       SUMMARY OF RESULTS

     Continuous S02 data were collected from January 25,  1980 to
March 19, 1980, with  intermittent data losses caused by CEM and
process  downtime.   Data were obtained for 18 or more  hours per
day on 29 days  and showed an average inlet emission rate of 5.2
Ib  S02/106  Btu  (daily  standard  deviation  of 6.1  percent),,  an
average  outlet  emission rate of  0.45  Ib S02/106 Btu  (standard
deviation of  26 percent) and an  average  S02  removal efficiency
of  91.46  percent (standard deviation  of  2.5  percent).   Average
total boiler  load  for the period was 109 x 106 Btu/h,  which is
52 percent of the total  rated capacity of the boiler system (210
x 106 Btu/h).
     The FGD  system operated normally 94.1 percent of the time
during the  test period  (1242  hours of normal operation during
1320 total hours from 2400, January 24, to 2400,  March 19).  The
CEM  operability was  78.0 percent  (969  hours of complete data
capture  during  the 1242  hours  available).   Because of numerous
combined boiler/FGD outages and CEM failures exceeding 6 h per
24 h operating  day,  23  days of potential data (18 or more hours
of  normal FGD  operation)  were  excluded from final  averages.
                               2-1

-------
     Initial P/S  tests demonstrated that the CEM  complied with



U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) standards for perfor-



mance.*  Certain  tests needed to  be  repeated to  achieve  this.



Final P/S tests demonstrated continued compliance with standards



except for  inlet and outlet tests  of  system  relative accuracy,



which yielded  results of 23.2  and 23.1 percent,  whereas  stan-



dards place the allowable limit for each at 20 percent.



     Particulate  tests  performed on March  10  and 11  showed  an



average  inlet emission  rate  of  0.33  lb/106 Btu,   an  average



outlet emission rate of 0.26 lb/106 Btu,  and an average removal



efficiency of 21.2 percent.



     Nitrogen oxide tests performed on March 10 and 11 showed an



average  inlet  emission rate of 0.65 Ib NO  /106  Btu,  an average
                                          4V


outlet  rate of  0.63  Ib NO /106  Btu, and an  average  removal
                            ^V


efficiency of 3.1 percent.
* Performance Specifications 2 and 3, Federal Register, Vol. 44,

  No. 197,.October 10, 1979.
                               2-2

-------
                            SECTION 3



                             RESULTS





3.1  PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATION TESTS



     Complete P/S tests were  performed  at the beginning and end



of  the  test period  to  ensure equivalence of CEM data to  data



from manual  reference method tests.  Tables  3-1 and  3-2  sum-



marize results of the initial P/S tests,  and Tables 3-3 and 3-4



summarize the results of the final P/S tests.



3.1.1  Initial P/S Test Results





Sampling Locations—



     Both  inlet  and outlet  CEM  and manual reference  method



sampling points were chosen to be representative of the process



streams tested and achieve equivalence between manual method and



CEM  samples.   This  was  achieved  in  all   cases  by  choosing



sampling points  centrally located in the  ducts  at  the furthest



accessible  points downstream from  possible process  interfer-



ences.   Inlet  manual  method  samples  were  drawn  immediately



downstream  from  the  CEM probe tip  (Figure 3-1),  whereas outlet



CEM and manual method samples were taken from points adjacent in



the stack (Figure 3-2).
                               3-1

-------
               TABLE 3-1.  SUMMARY OF INITIAL PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATION RESULTS FOR THE S02 MONITOR
Test parameter
i .
System relative accuracy
Calibration error

Zero drift (2-h)
Zero drift (24-h)
Calibration drift (2-h)
Calibration drift (24-h)
Response time
Conditioning period
Operational period
Required performance
specifications
£20% of the mean value of the
reference method test data in
pounds per million Btu
<5% of each (50% of span, 90% of
span) calibration gas mixture

2% of span
2% of span
2% of span
2.5% of span
15 m1n maximum
168-h minimum
168-h minimum
Performance
resul
Inlet
Outlet
High High
range Mid
Low High
range Mid
High range
Low range
High range
Low range
High range
Low range
High range
Low range
High range
Low range


testing
ts
7.32%
6.64%
0.57%
0.39%
1.16%
0.58%
0.06%
0.06%
0.00%
0.00%
0.25%
0.34%
0.65%
1.11%
21.2 s
50.9 s
>168 h
>168 h
I
N>

-------
              TABLE 3-2.  SUMMARY OF INITIAL PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATION RESULTS FOR THE 02 MONITOR
            Test parameter
Required performance
   specifications
                                                                           Performance testing
                                                                                 results
u»
I
Calibration error

Zero drift (2-h)
Zero drift (24-h)
Calibration drift (2-h)
Calibration drift (24-h)
Operational period
Conditioning period
Response time
                                      £5% of the mean value of the
                                      reference method test data
       £0.5%
       <0.4%
       <0.5%
  168-h minimum
  168-h minimum
 10 min maximum
                                High range
                                Mid range
 0.43%
 1.58%
 0.00%
 0.00%
 0.00%
 0.33%
 >168 h
 >168 h
21.1 s

-------
          TABLE 3-3.   SUMMARY  OF  FINAL  PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATION RESULTS FOR THE S02 MONITOR
Test parameter
•*•
System relative accuracy
Calibration error

Zero drift (2-h)
Zero drift (24-h)
Calibration drift (2-h)
Calibration drift (24-h)
Response time
Conditioning period
Operational period
Required performance
specifications
<20% of the mean value of the
reference method test data in
pounds per million Btu
<5% of each (50% of span, 90% of
span) calibration gas mixture

2% of span
2% of span
2% of span
2.5% of span
15 min maximum
168 h-min1mum
168 h-minimum
Performance
resul
Inlet
Outlet
High High
range Mid
Low High
range Mid
High range
Low range
High range
Low range
High range
Low range
High range
Low range
High range
Low range

.
testing
ts
23.2%
23.1%
1.80%
0.50%
0.53%
0.59%
0.00%
0.12%
0.00%
0.20%
0.20%
0.19%
1.60%
1.50%
a
a
a
a
Not applicable.

-------
                   TABLE 3-4.  SUMMARY OF FINAL PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATION RESULTS FOR THE 02 MONITOR
Test parameter
Calibration error
Zero drift (2-h)
Zero drift (24-h)
Calibration drift (2-h)
Calibration drift (24-h)
Operational period
Conditioning period
Response time
Required performance
specifications
<5% of the mean value of the
reference method test data
<0.4%
<0.5%
<0.4%
<0.5%
168-h minimum
168-h minimum
10 min maximum
Performance testing
results
High range 0.00%
Mid range 0.10%
0.03%
0.03%
0.09%
0.48%
a
a
a
tn
         Not applicable.

-------
      ^ ^ ^ ^
OOOOOOf
«-48 in.
                      REFERENCE METHOD
                     —SAMPLE PORTS
                  \
            CONTINUOUS
             MONITOR
              PROBE
                        REFERENCE
                          METHOD
                                            SCRUBBER
                                             MODULE
 Figure.3-1.  Scrubber inlet sampling locations.
                    3-6

-------
REFERENCE
 METHOD
  TRAIN
 64 in. INSIDE
   DIAMETER
                                        162 in.
                 CONTINUOUS
                  MONITOR
REFERENCE
 METHOD
 SAMPLE
  PORT
                                             Lr
                                        123 in.
                                                      w
                                                          ^
                                                                  CONTINUOUS
                                                                 x MONITOR
                                                                   LOCATION
         Figure 3-2.  Scrubber outlet sampling locations.
                                 3-7

-------
Conditioning Period—
     The  period starting  1400, January  17,  1980,  and  ending
2400, January 24, 1980, was the conditioning period for the CEM.
During this period the CEM was operated in the same manner as  it
was  during  the following  test  period,  with  no  maintenance,
repairs,  replacements,  or  adjustments  other than specified  as
routine and required by operation and maintenance manuals  or the
manufacturers' representatives.

Operational Test Period—
     The  CEM was  operated  from  the  end  of the  conditioning
period, 2400,  January 24,  1980, through April 2,  1980, with  no
maintenance,  repairs,  replacement,   or  adjustments not  clearly
routine or  required as specified by the  manufacturers.   During
this period all test  data  for initial and  final  P/S  tests and
all CEM emissions data were collected.

Calibration Gas Certification—
     The S02  calibration gases were certified by the vendors to
have values  traceable to  National Bureau  of  'Standards (NBS)
concentrations.  The  appendix  in  this volume includes copies of
the certificates of  analysis  for  the four S02 calibration gases
used.  The midrange oxygen calibration gas was analyzed by PEDCo
and  found  to have a  value  within  5 percent of  the vendors tag
value;  the vendors tag value was used (12.0% O2).  The test data
for this analysis are included with the appendix in this volume.
Because ambient air (20.95 %  O2)  was used  as the span gas,  no
certification was needed.
                               3-8

-------
Calibration Error—
     Calibration error tests were performed February 8.   The S02
monitor met the  error  limitation of less than 5 percent on both
operating ranges, and  the  O2  monitor met the same limitation on
its single  range.   Tables  3-5 and 3-6 present  the  test results
for the low-  and  high-range (outlet  and  inlet)  SO2  monitor
calibration error;  the test  results  for  O2  monitor calibration
error are presented in Table 3-7.

2-Hour Zero and Calibration Drift—
     The 2-hour  drift  tests  of  the  S02  and  02 monitors  were
performed February  9  through February 22.   The results  of the
low- and high-range  (outlet and  inlet)  S02 monitor drift tests,
presented  in  Tables  3-8  and Table  3-9  were  both within the
allowable limit  of  2  percent of span for both zero and calibra-
tion drift.   The 02  monitor drift  test results,  presented in
Table 3-10, were within the  allowable  limit of 0.4 percent O2
for zero and calibration drift.

24-Hour Zero and Calibration Drift—
     The 24-hour drift tests were   performed  from January 24
through  January  31.     Because   CEM  failure  on  the   night of
January 29  to 30 affected calibration  of the  SO2  monitor, the
S02 drift tests had to be repeated.   The repeat drift tests for
the S02 analyzer were performed from January 31 through Febr\iary
7.  Because the O2 monitor calibration was unaffected by the CEM
failure, the  O2  drift  test results obtained   from January 24
through January 31 were valid.
                               3-9

-------
TABLE 3-5.  INITIAL TEST RESULTS  FOR  LOW-RANGE  (OUTLET)
             S02 MONITOR CALIBRATION  ERROR
             (ppm S02 except as indicated)
Date in
1980
2/8
2/8
2/8
2/8
2/8
2/8
2/8
2/8
2/8
2/8
2/8
2/8
2/8
2/8
2/e
Test
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Calibration gas
concentration
(A)
254
427
254
0
427
254
0
254
427
0
427
254
0
427
0
Monitor reading
(B)
254.5
431.5
253.5
0
431.5
255
0
254
431
0
432
255.5
0
431.5
1.0
Arithmetic mean
95% confidence interval
Calibration error, % A
Arithmetic
difference
(A-B)
Mid
-0.5

+0.5


-1.0

0.0



-1.5



-0.5
0.98
0.58
Span

-4.5


-4.5



-4.0

-5.0


-4.5

-4.5
0.44
1.16
                        3-10

-------
TABLE 3-6.   INITIAL TEST RESULTS FOR  HIGH-RANGE  (INLET)
             S02 MONITOR CALIBRATION  ERROR
             (ppm SO^ except as  indicated)
Date in
1980
2/8
2/8
2/8
2/8
2/8
2/8
2/8
2/8
2/8
2/8
2/8
2/8
2/8
2/8
2/8
test
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Calibration gas
concentration
(A)
0
2000
4250
2000
4250
0
4250
0
4250
2000
4250
2000
0
2000
0
Monitor reading
(B)
0
1995
4220
2000
4215
5
4210
5
4210
2000
4215
2010
10
2000
10
Arithmetic mean
95% confidence interval
Calibration error, % A
Arithmetic
difference
(A-B)
Mid

5

0





0

-10

0

-1.0
6.80
0.39%
Span


30

35

40

40

35




36
5.2
0.97%
                           3-11

-------
TABLE 3-7.   INITIAL TEST RESULTS  FOR 02 MONITOR CALIBRATION ERROR
                   (% D£ except as Indicated)

Test No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

Calibration gas
concentration
(A)
12
20.95
12
0
12
0
20.95
0
20.95
0
20.95
12
0
12
20.95

Monitor reading
(B)
12.04
20.85
12.16
0
12.08
0
20.90
0
20.85
0
20.93
12.18
0
12.14
20.95
Arithmetic mean
95% confidence interval
Calibration error,3 % A
Arithmetic difference
(A-B)
Mid
-0.04

-0.16

-0.08






-0.18

-0.14

-0.12
0.07
1.58
Span

0.0




0.05

0.10

0.02



0.0
+0.03
0.06
0.43
 (|AM|  +CI9S)
       M
                                3-12

-------
    TABLE 3-8.  INITIAL TEST RESULTS FOR LOW-RANGE (OUTLET)  MONITOR
                  2-HOUR ZERO AND CALIBRATION DRIFT3
                   (% of scale except as indicated)
Test
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Date
in
1980
2/8
2/8
2/9
2/11
2/11
2/11
2/11
2/11
2/11
2/11
2/13
2/14
2/15
2/15
2/22
Test time
Start
1315
1600
1330
0900
1100
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2100
1315
1200
1400
1330
End
1600
1800
1530
1100
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2300
1515
1400
1600
1530
Zero reading
Start
(A)
0.2
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
End
(B)
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Arithmetic mean
95% confidence interval
2-hour drift, b %
Zero
drift
(C=B-A)
0.0
-0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
-0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
-0.01
0.05
0.07
Span reading
Start
(D)
86.3
86.5
85.7
85.5
85.6
85.4
85.4
85.2
85.6
85.7
86.0
86.0
86.2
86.2
86.5
End
(E)
86.5
85.8
85.8
85.6
85.4
85.4
85.2
85.6
85.7
85.7
86.3
85.0
85.5
86.3
86.7
Span
drift
(F=E-D
0.2
-0.7
0.1
•0.1
-0.2
0.0
-0.3
0.4
0.1
0.0
0.3
-1.0
-0.7
0.1
0.2



Cali-
bration
drift
(G=F-C)
0.2
-0.5
0.1
0.1
-0.2
0.0
-0.3
0.2
0.3
0.0
0.3
-1.0
-0.7
0.1
0.2
-0.08
0.21
0.34
Calibration gas concentration of 427  ppm S02  and  scale  from  0  to 500 ppm S02-
See Subsection 6.2.3 for explanation  of units.
                                 3-13

-------
      TABLE 3-9.  INITIAL TEST RESULTS FOR HIGH-RANGE  (INLET) SO? MONITOR
                      2-HOUR ZERO AND CALIBRATION DRIFT3
                       (% of scale except as indicated)
Test
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Date
in
1930
2/8
2/8
2/9
2/11
2/11
2/11
2/11
2/11
2/11
2/11
2/13
2/14
2/15
2/15
2/22
Test time
Start
1400
1600
1330
0900
1100
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2100
1315
1200
1400
1330
End
1600
1800
1530
1100
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2300
1515
1400
1600
1530
Zero reading
Start
(A)
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
End
(B)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
-0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Arithmetic mean
95% confidence interval
2-hour drift, b %
Zero
drift
(C-B-A)
-0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
-0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
-0.02
0.03
0.06
Span reading
Start
(D)
84.3
83.9
83.8
83.7
83.7
83.4
83.2
83.6
83.5
83.6
84.4
83.8
84.7
84.5
83.3
End
(E)
83.9
84.0
83.7
83.7
83.4
83.2
83.6
83.5
83.6
83.7
84.3
83.7
84.0
84.4
83.2
Span
drift
(F=E-D)
-0.4
0.1
-0.1
0.0
-0.3
-0.2
0.4
-0.1
0.1
0.1
-0.1
-0.1
-0.7
-0.1
-0.1



Cali-
bration
drift
(G=F-C)
-0.2
0.1
-0.1
0.0
-0.3
-0.2
0.4
-0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
-0.1
-0.7
-0.1
-0.1
-0.08
0.13
0.25
a Calibration gas concentration of 4250 ppm S0? and  scale  from 0  to  5000  ppm
  S02.                                        *
b See Subsection 6.2.3 for explanation of units.
                                   3-14

-------
        TABLE 3-10.   INITIAL  TEST  RESULTS FOR 02 MONITOR 24-HOUR
                       ZERO AND  CALIBRATION DRIFT3
                    (% of scale  except as indicated)
Test
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Date
in
1980
2/8
2/8
2/9
2/11
2/11
2/11
2/11
2/11
2/11
2/11
2/13
2/14
2/15
2/15
2/22
Test time
Start
1400
1600
1330
0900
1100
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2100
1315
1200
1400
1315
End
1600
1800
1530
1100
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2300
1515
1400
1600
1515
Zero reading
Start
(A)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
End
(B)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Arithmetic mean
95% confidence interval
2-hour drift,b %02
Zero
drift
(OB-A)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
+0.1
0.0
-0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.00
0.02
0.00
Span reading
Start
(D)
87.0
86.9
86.9
86.7
86.9
86.8
86.7
86.8
86.9
86.9
87.0
86.8
86.5
86.3
87.2
End
(E)
86.9
86.9
87.1
86.9
86.8
86.7
86.8
86.9
86.9
86.8
87.0
86.5
86.3
86.4
87.0
Span
drift
(F-E-D)
-0.1
0.0
+0.2
+0.2
-0.1
-0.1
+0.1
+0.0
0.0
-0.1
0.0
-0.3
-0.2
+0.1
-0.2


Cali-
bration
drift
(G=F-C)
-0.1
0.0
+0.2
+0.2
-0.1
-0.1
+0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
-0.3
-0.2
+0.1
-0.2
-0.03
0.08
0.02
Calibration gas concentration of 20.95% 02  and scale  from 0  to  25%

Determined as ((AM]  + CIg5)  x 0.25.
                                 3-15

-------
     Tables 3-11 and 3-12  present  results  of the  low-  and high-
range S02 monitor 24-hour  drift  tests;  the data show compliance
with  the 2  and 2.5  percent limits  for S02  monitor  zero  and
calibration drift.   The drift  data from  the failed tests  are
listed on  the tables,  but not included  in  calculations.  Table
3-13 presents  results  of the O2 monitor 24-hour zero  and cali-
bration  drift tests;  the data  show  compliance  with  the  0.5
percent limit for 02 monitor zero and calibration  drift.

CEM Response Time—
     The instrument and system response times for  DuPont 460  and
Thermox WDG III gas monitors have been shown by previous testing
to be well within  the  15 minute specification. Verification of
this was obtained by  tests performed March 3, showing  the  aver-
age response time in all cases to be less than 1 minute. Tables
3-14 and 3-15 present results of the low- and high-range (outlet
and inlet) S02 monitor  tests.   Table 3-16 shows  test results of
the 02 monitor.

System Relative Accuracy—
     Ten inlet system relative  accuracy tests were performed on
January  29 and  30.  Results  showed  relative accuracy of  7.3
percent,  complying with the specified limit of 20  percent.
     Tests  of outlet  system relative  accuracy were  performed
from January  31  through February  20.   The  extended period  for
the completion of these  tests  was needed because of CEM mainte-
nance on February 4,  FGD maintenance from February 6 through 8,
                               3-16

-------
CO
I
                        TABLE  3-11.   INITIAL  TEST RESULTS FOR LOW-RANGE (OUTLET) S02 MONITOR 24-HOUR
                                                 ZERO AND CALIBRATION DRIFTd
Test
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Date in 1980
Start
1/24
1/25
1/26
1/27
1/28
1/29
1/30
End
1/25
1/26
1/27
1/28
1/29
1/30
1/31
Test time
Start
1820
1000
1530
1330
1630
1600
2000
End
1800
1530
1330
lf»30
1600
0900
0900
Zero reading
Start
(A)
0.8
-0.5
1.0
0.6
2.0
0.5
0.0
End
(B)
-0.5
0.0
0.6
0.6
0.5
3.5
0.0
Zero
drift
(C=B-A)
-1.3
0.5
-0.4
0.0
-1.5
3.0
0.0
Span reading
Start
(D)
83.2
88.0
87.0
85.0
96.0
94.4
82.3
End
(E)
88.0
87.0
85.0
87.0
94.4
Span
drift
(F=E-D)
4.8
-1.0
-2.0
2.0
-1.6
OFF SCALE: VO
83.2
0.9
Cali-
bration
drift
(6=F-C)
6.1
-1.5
-1.6
2.0
-0.1
ID
0.9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1/31
2/1
2/2
2/3
2/4
2/5
2/6 '
2/1
2/2
2/3
2/4
2/5
2/6
2/7
0900
0915
1400
1430
1630
1830
1648
0915
1400
1430
1530
0900
1648
2130
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Arithmetic mean
95% confidence interval
24-hour drift,b %
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
81.3
81.8
82.2
82.8
83.6
81.0
86.4
81.8
81.5
82.8
81.6
84.0
81.5
87.6
0.5
-0.3
0.5
-1.2
0.4
0.5
1.2



0.5
-0.3
0.5
-1.2
0.4
0.5
1.2
0.23
0.71
1.11
                  Calibration gas concentration of 427 ppm SO,, and scale from 0 to 500 ppm SO,,.

                  See  Subsection  6.2.3  for explanation of units.

-------
I
M
00
                            TABLE  3-12.   INITIAL TEST RESULTS FOR HIGH-RANGE  (INLET)  S02 MONITOR  24-HOUR
                                                    ZERO AND CALIBRATION DRIFT9
                                                  (% of scale except as  indicated)
Test
No:
l
2
3
4
5
6
7
Date 1n 1980
Start
1/24
1/25
1/26
1/27
1/28
1/29
1/30
End
1/25
1/26
1/27
1/28
1/29
1/30
1/31
Test time
Start
1820
1800
1530
1330
1630
1600
2000
End
1800
1530
1330
1630
1600
. 0900
0900
Zero reading
Start
(A)
1.1
0.0
1.2
1.4
0.8
0.3
0.0
End
(B)
0.0
1.2
1.3
0.8
0.3
0.2
0.0
Zero
drift
(C=B-A)
-1.1
1.2
0.1
-0.5
-0.5
-0.1
0.0
Soan reading
Start
(D)
84.3
89.0
86.4
85.4
94.8
95.3
84.9
End
(E)
89.0
86.4
85.4
87.4
95.3
Span
drift
(F=E-D)
4.7
-2.6
-1.0
2.0
0.5
OFF SCALE: V
85.0 +0.1
Cali-
bration
drift
(G=F-C)
5.8
-3.8
-1.1
2.5
0.1
OID
0.1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1/31
2/1
2/2
2/3
2/4
2/5
2/6 '
2/1
2/2
2/3
2/4
2/5
2/6
2/7
0900
0915
1400
1430
1530
0900
1648
0915
1400
1430
1530
0900
1648
2130
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Arithmetic mean
95% confidence interval
24- hour drift,6 %
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
83.8
83.6
84.6
84.2
85.0
84.0
83.8
83.6
83.6
84.2
84.5
84.6
83.6
85.0
-0.2
0.0
-0.4
0.3
-0.4
-0.4
1.2



-0.2
0.0
-0.4
0.3
-0.4
-0.4
1.2
O.'Ol
0.54
0.65
               Calibration gas concentration of 4250 ppm S02  and  scale  from 0 to  5000  ppm S02.
               See Subsection 6.2.3 for explanation of units.

-------
                 TABLE 3-13.   INITIAL TEST RESULTS FOR 0? MONITOR 24-HOUR ZERO AND CALIBRATION DRIFT3
                                           (% of scale except as indicated)
i
M
VO
Test
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Date in 1980
Start
1/24
1/25
1/26
1/27
1/28
1/29
1/30
End
1/25
1/26
1/27
1/28
1/29
1/30
1/31
Test time
Start
1820
1800
1530
1330
1630
1600
2000
End
1800
1530
1330
1630
1600
0930
0900
Zero reading
Start
(A)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
End
(B)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Arithmetic mean
95% confidence interval
24-hour drift,5 % 02
Zero
drift
(C=B-A)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Span reading
Start
(D)
88.0
88.0
88.0
88.0
88.3
88.6
87.0
End
(E)
88.0
88.0
88.0
88.3
88.6
86.0
86.7
Span
drift
(F=E-D)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
-2.6
-0.3


Cali-
bration
drift
(G=F-C)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
-2.6
-0.3
-0.41
0.90
0.33
           a Calibration gas concentration of 20.95% 02  and  scale  from  0  to  25%  02-

           b Determined as % 02 = (IAM|  + CIg5)  x 0.25.

-------
TABLE 3-14.  TEST RESULTS FOR LOW-RANGE  (OUTLET) S02 MONITOR RESPONSE TIME3
                                 (seconds)
Test No.
1
2
3
Average
Upscale
46.0
45.8
46.0
A = 45.9
Downscale
50.5
51.0
51.2
B = 50.9
   System response time (slower of A and B) = 50.9

        C = (A - B) = 5.0 (must be less than 15% of average or
                           5 seconds, whichever is less)


   a Tests run at 1200 on March 3, 1980, with span gas  concentration  of
     427 ppm S02.
                                 3-20

-------
TABLE 3-15.   TEST RESULTS  FOR HIGH-RANGE (INLET) S02 MONITOR RESPONSE TIME9
                                  I seconds)
Test No.
1
2
3
Average
Upscale
20.8
20.5
20.6
A = 20.6
Downscale
21.2
21.0
21.3
B = 21.2
         System response time (slower  of A and B) = 21.2

              C = (A - B) = 0.6 (must  be less than 15% of average or
                                 5  seconds, whichever is less)
           Tests run at 1206  on  March  3,  1980, with span gas concentration
           of 4250 ppm S02.
                                    3-21

-------
  TABLE 3-16.   TEST RESULTS FOR 0? MONITOR RESPONSE TIME3
                         (seconds)
Test No.
1
2
3
Average
Upscale
21.0
21.2
21.2
A = 21.1
Downscale
21.0
20.9
21.5
B = 21.1
System response time (slower  of A and B) * 21.1

     C = (A - B) = 0.0 (must  be less than 15% of average or
                        5 seconds, whichever is less)
a Tests run on March 3,  1980,  with  span  gas concentration of
  20.95% 02.
                          3-22

-------
and the  need  to repeat several tests that were void because  of
operational problems.  Four tests performed January 31  were void
because the air supply to the CEM probe blowback was not operat-
ing during  the test, two  tests  performed February 5  were void
because the CEM was  operating in an unrepresentative configura-
tion  (a  sample  gas  conditioner  was being  tested),   and  three
tests performed February 12 were void because of a high apparent
error of undetermined cause.
     The operational problems during  initial tests prompted a
complete repeat of  outlet  system  relative  accuracy   tests  on
February 19  and 20.  These  showed  a relative  accuracy of (i.64
percent,  within the  20  percent limit.   Results of the  first two
tests  performed  February  19  were  discarded from  calculation
because  of  a  faulty manual methods  test probe,  which  was re-
placed before further testing.
     Tables  3-17  and 3-18  present results  of  the   inlet and
outlet system relative accuracy tests.
3.1.6  Final P/S Test Results

Calibration Error—
     Final calibration error tests were performed on April 1 and
yielded consistent with  those of the initial tests performed on
February 8.   Tables  3-19  and 3-20  present the  results  of the
low- and high-range  (outlet  and  inlet)  S02  monitor calibration
error tests;  the  02  monitor  calibration  error results are pre-
sented in Table 3-21.
                               3-23

-------
                       TABLE 3-17.   INITIAL TEST RESULTS FOR SCRUBBER INLET CERTIFICATION
Date
in '
1980
1/29
1/29
1/29
1/30
1/30
1/30
1/30
1/30
1/30
1/30
Test
No.
SO-I-1
SO-I-2
SO- I -3
SO- 1-4
SO-I-5
SO-I-6
SO-I-7
SO- I -8
SO-I-9
SO-I-10
Test time
Start
1145
1328
1447
1005
1113
1214
1321
1426
1528
1647
End
1208
1351
1510
1028
1136
1237
1344
1449
1551
1710
Average
02, vol. %
RM9
13.0
13.1
13.0
13.0
12.8
13.2
13.0
12.9
12.9
13.0
13.0
Mb
13.6
13.0
13.0
13.0
12.8
12.8
12.7
12.9
13.4
13.2
13.0
S02* ppm
RM3
1101
1110
1119
1134
1216
1060
1172
1237
1088
1125
1136
Hb
1156
1212
1179
1171
1199
1175
1208
1237
1177
1205
1192
Diff.
(Xi)
+55
+102
+60
+37
-17
+115
+36
0
+89
+80
+55.7
xi2
3,025
10,404
3,600
1,369
289
13,225
1,296
0
7,921
6,400
4,753
S02, lb/10b Btu
RM9
5.19
5.26
5.23
4.94
5.07
4.53
4.97
5.21
4.62
4.68
4.97
H"
5.31
5.18
5.03
5.00
4.99
4.90
4.99
5.19
5.30
5.27
5.12
Diff.
(Xi)
+0.12
-0.08
-0.20
+0.06
-0.08
+0.37
+0.02
-0.02
+0.68
+0.59
+0.15
M2
0.0144
0.0064
0.04
0.0036
0.0064
0.1369
0.0004
0.0004
0.4624
0.3481
0.1019
u»
I
      95% confidence interval    = 0.214 Ib S02/1Q6 Btu
      System relative accuracy  = 7.32% of average RM
      a Reference method value.
        Monitor value

-------
                          TABLE  3-18.   INITIAL TEST  RESULTS  FOR  SCRUBBER  OUTLET CERTIFICATION
Date
in •
1980
2/19
2/19
2/19
2/20
2/20
2/20
2/20
2/20
2/20
2/20
2/20
2/20
Test
No.
50-0-1°
50-0-2°
SO-0-3
SO-0-4
SO-0-5
SO-0-6
SO-0-7
SO-0-8
SO-0-9
SO-0-10
SO-0-11
SO-0-12
Test time
Start
1357
1737
1927
0847
0947
1047
1147
1247
1347
1457
1557
1657
End
1420
1400
1950
0910
1010
1110
1210
1310
1410
1520
1620
1720
Average
02, vol. %
RM9
13.1
13.7
12.9
12.8
13.4
13.1
13.6
13.9
13.4
13.2
14.3
13.4
Mb
15.4
13.3
13.5
12.9
12.8
12.9
13.1
13.8
13.6
13.6
13.3
14.5
13.4
SO,,, ppm
RM
19
9
100
119
95
81
77
75
133
131
141
48
100
M
91
132
105
118
101
82
82
77
132
134
149
49
103
Diff.
(xi )
72
123
5
-1
6
1
5
2
-1
3
8
1
2.9
*i2
5,184
15,129
25
1
36
1
25
4
1
9
64
1
16.7
S02, lb/106 Btu
RM9
0.123
0.036
0.449
0.500
0.396
0.365
0.333
0.344
0.638
0.587
0.618
0.245
0.447*
Mb
0.555
0.476
0.476
0.498
0.420
0.343
0.350
0.363
0.611
0.614
0.657
0.255
0.459
Diff.
(xi )
0.432
0.027
0.027
-0.002
0.024
-0.022
0.017
0.019
-0.027
0.027
0.039
0.010
0.0112
2
Xi
0.1866
0.3014
0.0007
0.000004
0.0006
0.0005
0.0003
0.0004
0.0007
0.0007
0.0015
0.0001
0.00073
to
Ul
         95% confidence  interval  =  .016  Ib S02/106 Btu
         System  relative accuracy -  6.64% of average RM
         a
           Reference method  value.
          Monitor value.

        c Tests not used  in averages and calculations.

-------
        TABLE 3-19.  FINAL TEST RESULTS FOR LOW-RANGE  (OUTLET) SO?
                          MU.NITOR CALIBRATION  ERROR
                        (ppm S02 except as.indicated)

Date
in
1980
4/1
4/1
4/1
4/1
4/1
4/1
4/1
4/1
4/1
4/1
4/1
4/1
4/1
4/1
4/1

Test
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

Calibration gas
concentration
(A)
427
254
0
254
427
0
427
0
254
427
0
254
0
427
254

Monitor reading
(B)
428
254
0
253
429
0
428
0
253
429
0
253
0
429
255
Arithmetic mean
95% confidence interval
Calibration error,3 %
Arithmetic
difference
(A-B)

Mid

0

-1




-1


-1


+1
-0.40
1.11
0.59

Span
-H



+2

+1


+2



+2

+1.60
0.68
0.53
aDetermined as calibration error = tAM'A* Cl95 x 100.
                                  3-26

-------
      TABLE 3-20.  FINAL TEST RESULTS FOR HIGH-RANGE  (INLET) S0
                       MONITOR CALIBRATION ERROR
                     (ppm S02 except as indicated)

Date
in
1980
4/1
4/1
4/1
4/1
4/1
4/1
4/1
4/1
4/1
4/1.
4/1
4/1
4/1
4/1
4/1

Test
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

Calibration gas
concentration
(A)
0
2000
4250
0
4250
0
2000
4250
0
2000
4250
2000
0
4250
2000

Monitor reading
(B)
-5
1990
4204
0
4199
0
1990
4199
0
1990
4199
1990
0
4179
1990
Arithmetic mean
95% confidence interval
Calibration error,3 % A
Arithmetic
d'f£
Mid

-10




-10


-10

-10


-10
-10
0
0.5
sre
Span


-46

-51


-51


-51


-71

-54
12
1.8
Calibration error =
                                3-27

-------
     TABLE 3-21.  FINAL TEST RESULTS  FOR 0? MONITOR CALIBRATION ERROR
                       (% 02 except as  indicated)

Date
in
1980
4/1
4/1
4/1
4/1
4/1
4/1
4/1
4/1
4/1
4/1
4/1
4/1
4/1
4/1
4/1

Test
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
G
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

Calibration gas
concentration
(A)
20.9
0.0
12.0
0.0
20.9
0.0
20.9
12.0
0.0
12.0
20.9
0.0
12.0
20.9
12.0

Monitor reading
(B)
20.9
0.0
12.1
0.0
20.9
0.0
20.9
12.1
0.0
12.1
20.9
0.0
12.1
20.9
12.1
Arithmetic mean
95% confidence interval
Calibration error,
Arithmetic
difference
(A-B)
Mid


0.1




0.1

0.1


0.1

0.1
0.1
0.0
0.1
Span
0.0



0.0

0.0



0.0


0.0

0.0
0.0
0.0
%A=(|AMJ*CI95)X100.
                                   3-28

-------
2-Hour Zero and Calibration Drift—
     Final  2-hour  drift  tests  were  performed from  March  19
through  20 and  yielded results  consistent with  those of  the
tests performed  February  8  through 22.   Tables 3-22  and  3-23
present  the results  for  the  low- and  high-range (outlet  and
inlet)  S02  monitor 2-hour drift tests;  the  results  of the  O2
monitor 2-hour drift tests are presented in Table 3-24.
24-Hour Zero and Calibration Drift—
     Final  24-hour drift  tests  were  performed  from  March  11
through  18  and  demonstrated  compliance  with  the   allowable
limits.   Tables  3-25  and  3-26  present the results of  the  low--
and  high-range  (outlet  and  inlet)  S02  monitor  24-hour  drift
tests;  the O2 monitor  24-hour drift  results are presented  in
Table 3-27.

System Relative Accuracy—
     Final  system relative  accuracy  tests were performed  from
March 31  through April  2.  The inlet  and outlet tests  results,
presented  in  Tables 3-28  and 3-29, show system relative accur-
acies of 23.2  and 23.1  percent.  It is suspected that the error
during  these   tests  resulted from RM 02  data  of questionable
quality; the ORSAT reagent used was found to be contaminated and
was discarded  following these tests.
                               3-29

-------
TABLE 3-22.  FINAL TEST RESULTS FOR LOW-RANGE  (OUTLET) SO-> MONITOR 2-HOUR
                       ZERO AND CALIBRATION  DRIFTa
                    (% of scale except as  indicated)
Test
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Date
in
'1980
3/18
3/18
3/18
3/18
3/18
3/18
3/19
3/19
3/19
3/19
3/19
3/20
3/20
3/20
3/20
Test time
Start
0915
1115
1315
1515
1715
1915
0900
1100
1300
1500
1700
1045
1235
1455
1645
End
1115
1315
1515
1715
1915
2115
1100
1300
1500
1700
1900
1235
1455
1645
1845
Zero reading
Start
(A)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.4
0.2
0.1
0.1
-0.2
-0.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
End
(B)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.4
0.2
0.1
0.1
-0.2
-0.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Zero
drift
(C=B-A)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.4
-0.2
-0.1
0.0
-0.3
-0.2
0.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Arithmetic mean 0.00
95% confidence interval 0.12
2-hour drift,5 % 0.12
Span reading
Start
(D)
88.4
88.7
88.6
88.6
88.9
88.9
88.8
88.9
88.4
88.0
88.7
87.2
87.0
87.2
86.6
End
(E)
88.7
88.6
88.6
88.9
88.9
88.8
88.9
88.4
38.0
88.7
88.6
87.0
87.2
86.6
86.9
Span
drift
(F=E-D)
0.3
-0.1
0.0
0.3
0.0
-0.1
0.1
-0.5
-0.4
0.7
-0.1
-0.2
0.2
-0.6
0.3


Cali-
bration
drift
(G=F-C)
0.3
-0.1
0.0
-0.1
0.2
0.0
0.1
-0.2
-0.2
0.3
-0.1
-0.2
0.2
-0.6
0.3
-0.02
0.14
0.19
Calibration gas concentration of 427 ppm S02 and scale from 0 to 500 ppm S02-
See Subsection 6.2.3 for explanation of units.
                                    3-30

-------
      TABLE 3-23.  FINAL TEST RESULTS FOR HIGH-RANGE (INLET)  S02
              MONITOR 2-HOUR ZERO AND CALIBRATION DRIFT3
                   (% of scale except as indicated)
Test
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Date
in
1980
3/18
3/18
3/18
3/18
3/18
3/18
3/19
3/19
3/19
3/19
3/19
3/20
3/20
3/20
3/20
Test time
Start
0915
1115
1315
1515
1715
1915
0900
1100
1300
1500
1700
1045
1235
1455
1645
End
0915
1315
1515
1715
1915
2115
1100
1300
1500
1700
1900
1235
1455
1645
1845
Zero reading
Start
(A)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
End
(B)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Arithmetic mean
95% confidence interval
2- hour drift,5 %
Zero
drift
(OB-A)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Span reading
Start
(D)
85.8
86.0
86.0
86.0
85.9
86.2
86.2
86.3
85.8
85.6
85.4
84.3
84.7
84.5
84.2
End
(E)
86.0
86.0
86.0
85.9
86.2
86.0
86.3
85.8
85.6
85.4
85.4
84.7
84.5
84.2
84.4
Span
.drift
(F=E-D)
0.2
0.0
0.0
-0.1
0.3
-0.2
0.1
-0.5
0.2
-0.2
0.0
0.4
-0.3
-0.3
0.2



Cali-
bration
drift
(F=F-C)
0.2
0.0
0.0
-0.1
0.3
-0.2
0.1
-0.5
0.2
-0.2
0.0
0.4
-0.3
-0.3
0.2
-0.03
0.14
0.20.
Calibration gas concentration of 4250 ppm S0? and scale  from 0 to  5000  ppm

See Subsection 6.2.3 for explanation of units.
                                   3-31

-------
TABLE 3-24.   FINAL TEST RESULTS  FOR D£ MONITOR 2-HOUR
             ZERO AND CALIBRATION DRIFT3
          (% of scale except  as  indicated)
Test
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Date
in
1980
3/18
3/18
3/18
3/18
3/18
3/18
3/19
3/19
3/19
3/19
3/19
3/20
3/20
3/20
3/20
Test time
Start
0915
1115
1315
1515
1715
1915
0900
1100
1300
1500
1700
1045
1235
1455
1645
End
1115
1315
1515
1715
1915
2115
1100
1300
1500
1700
1900
1235
1455
1645
1845
Zero reading
Start
(A)
0.0
-0.1
-0.1
-0.1
-0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.0
-0.3
-0.4
-0.5
End
(B)
-0.1
-0.1
-0.1
-0.1
0.0
-0.1
0.0
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.2
-0.3
-0.4
-0.5
-0.5
Arithmetic mean
95% confidence interval
2-hour drift, b %
Zero
drift
(C=B-A)
-0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
-0.1
0.0
0.2
0.0
-0.1
-0.1
-0.3
-0.1
-0.1
0.0
-0.04
0.08
0.03
Span reading
Start
(D)
86.2
86.4
86.4
86.4
86.4
86.4
86.6
86.3
86.5
86.3
86.0
84.5
84.1
85.5
86.0
End
(E)
86.4
86.4
86.4
86.4
86.4
86.4
86.3
86.5
86.3
86.0
86.0
84.1
85.5
86.0
85.8
Span
drift
(F-E-D)
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
-0.3
0.2
-0.2
-0.3
0.0
-0.4
1.6
0.5
-0.2


Cali-
bration
drift
(G=F-C)
0.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
-0.1
0.1
-0.3
0.0
-0.2
-0.2
-0.1
-0.1
1.7
0.6
-0.2
0.08
0.28
0.09
a Calibration gas concentration  of  20.95%

b % 02 = (lAMl + CI95)  x 0.25.
                                 and scale from 0 to 25%
                           3-32

-------
u>
I
CJ
CO
                           TABLE 3-25.  FINAL TEST RESULTS FOR LOW-RANGE (OUTLET) S02
                                   MONITOR 24-MOURZERO AND CALIBRATION DRIFT3
                                        (% of scale except as indicated)
Test
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Date in 1980
Start
3/11
3/12
3/13
3/14
3/15
3/16
3/17
End
3/12
3/13
3/14
3/15
3/16
3/17
3/18
Test time
Start
2045
2045
2145
1700
1345
1500
1400
End
2045
2145
1700
1345
1500
1400
0900
Zero reading
Start
(A)
0.0
0.4
0.2
-0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
End
(B)
0.4
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Arithmetic mean
95% confidence interval
24- hour drift,b %
Zero
drift
(C=B-A)
0.4
-0.2
-0.2
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.2
Span reading
Start
(D)
87.0
86.5
85.6
86.1
86.1
85.8
85.7
End
(E)
86.5
85.6
87.6
86.8
85.8
83.8
88.4
Span
drift
(F-E-D)
-0.5
-0.9
2.0
0.7
-0.3
-2.0
2.7


Cali-
bration
drift
(G=F-C)
-0.9
-0.7
2.2
0.5
-0.3
-2.0
2.7
0.2
1.1
1.5
              a Calibration gas concentration of 427 ppm $03 and scale from 0 to  500 ppm S02.

              b See Subsection 6.2.3 for explanation of units.

-------
                           TABLE  3-26.   FINAL  TEST  RESULTS  FOR HIGH-RANGE  (INLET)  S02
                                     MONITOR 24-HOUR ZERO AND CALIBRATION  DRIFTS
                                          (% of  scale except as  indicated)
Test
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Date in 1980
Start
3/11
3/12
3/13
3/14
3/15
3/16
3/17
End
3/12
3/13
3/14
3/-,5
3/16
3/17
3/18
Test time
Start
2045
2045
2145
1700
1345
1500
1400
End
2045
2145
1700
1345
1500
1400
0900
Zero reading
Start
(A)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
End
(B)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Arithmetic mean
95X confidence interval
24-hour drift, b %
Zero
drift
(C=B-A)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
Span reading
Start
(D)
85.3
84.3
83.0
83.9
83.7
82.8
83.9
End
(E)
84.3
83.0
84.9
84.0
82.8
81.6
85.8
Span
drift
(F-E-D)
-1.0
-1.3
1.9
0.1
-0.9
-1.2
1.9


Cali-
bration
drift
(G-F-C)
-1.0
-1.3
1.9
0.1
-0.9
-1.2
1.9
-0.07
1.32
1.63
I
w
            Calibration gas concentration of 4250 ppm S02 and scale from 0 to 5000 ppm S02-
            See Subsection 6.2.3 for explanation of units.

-------
                    . TABLE 3-27.  FINAL TEST RESULTS FOR 02 2-HOUR ZERO AMD CALIBRATION DRIFT3
                                         (% of scale except as indicated)
Test
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Date in 1980
Start
3/11
3/12
3/13
3/14
3/15
3/16
3/17
End
3/12
3/13
3/14
3/15
3/16
3/17
3/18
Test time
Start
2045
2045
2145
1700
1345
1500
1400
End
2045
2145
1700
1345
1500
1400
0900
Zero reading
Start
(A)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
End
(B)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
Arithmetic mean
Confidence interval
24-hour drift,b % 02
Zero
drift
(C=B-A)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
0.04
0.08
0.03
Span reading
Start
(D)
86.5
83.0
86.4
85.7
86.0
86.0
85.6
End
(E)
83.0
86.4
85.7
86.0
86.0
85.6
86.3
Span
drift
(F=E-D)
-3.5
3.4
-0.7
0.3
0.0
-0.4
0.7


Cali-
bration
drift
(G=F-C)
-3.5
3.4
-0.7
0.3
0.0
-0.4
0.4
-0.08
1.84
0.48
co

u>
Ul
            Calibration gas concentration of 20.95% G£ and scale from 0 to 25%

            Percent 02 = (|AM| + CI95) x 0.25.

-------
                            TABLE 3-28.  FINAL TEST RESULTS FOR SCRUBBER INLET CERTIFICATION
Date
in •
1980
3/31
3/31
4/1
4/1.
4/1
4/2
4/2
4/2
4/2
4/2
4/2
4/2
. Test
No.
RI-1C
RI-2C
RI-3
RI-4
RI-5
RI-6
RI-7
RI-8
RI-9
RI-10
RI-11C
RI-12
Test time
Start
1627
1757
1237
1347
1457
0807
0937
1047
1207
1457
1607
1727
End
1650
1820
1300
1410
1520
0830
1000
1110
1230
1520
1630
1750
Average
0?, vol. %
RMa
11.2
11.5
13.9
13.4
14.0
13.7
13.0
14.1
13.4
13.1
12.8
13.2
13.5
Mb
14.8
15.4
14.1
16.0
15.3
14.7
13.7
13.4
14.4
15.7
15.7
15.3
14.7
SO?, ppm
RMa
1008
792
872
781
707
875
1062
1147
1023
789
796
853
901
Mb
978
883
870
631
699
869
1058
1101
991
764
792
818
867
Diff.
(xi)
-30
+91
-2
-150
-8
-6
-4
-46
-32
-25
-4
-35
-3.42
x-2
xi
900
8,281
4
22,500
64
36
16
2,116
1,024
625
16
1,225
3,067.3
SO?, lb/106 Btu
RM3
3.50
2.84
4.19
3.51
3.45
4.09
4.52
5.68
4.59
3.40
3.31
3.73
4.13
Mb
5.40
5.43
4.32
4.32
4.20
4.73
4.91
4.91
5.11
4.90
5.09
4.90
4.70
Diff.
(xi)
+1.90
+2.59
+0.13
+0.81
+0.75
+0.64
+0.39
-0.77
+0.52
+1.50
+1.78
+1.17
+0.74
Xi2
3.160
6.710
0.017
0.656
0.563
0.410
0.152
0.593
0.270
2.250
3.170
1.370
0.700
u>
         95% confidence interval
         System relative accuracy
0.215 Ib S02/106 Btu
23.2% of RM
          a Reference method value.
            Monitor value.
          c Tests not used  in averages and calculations.

-------
                       TABLE 3-29.   FINAL TEST RESULTS FOR SCRUBBER OUTLET CERTIFICATION
Date
in '
1980
3/31
4/2
4/2
4/2
4/2
4/2
4/2
4/2
4/2
4/3
4/3
4/3
Test
No.
RO-1
RO-2
RO-3
RO-4
RO-5
RO-6
RO-7
RO-8
RO-9
RO-10
RO-11
RO-1 2
Test time
Start
1712
0732
0902
1013
1122
1242
1422
1532
1642
0912
1012
1112
End
1735
0755
0925
1036
1145
1305
1445
1555
1705
0935
1035
1135
Average
02, vol. %
RMa
13.5
14.7
12.1
12.8
13.7
11.4
13.6
13.9
12.9
13.5
14.2
14.9
13.4
Mb
16.4
14.1
13.4
13.5
14.4
14.5
14.8
15.2
15.4
14.1
13.1
13.6
14.4
S02, ppm
RMa
86
386
636
466
141
135
99
55
176
71
136
62
204
Mb
64
249
472
377
118
85
57
27
147
64
116
106
157
Diff.
(xi)
-22
-137
-164
-89
-23
-50
-42
-28
-29
-7
-20
44
-54.6
x<2
484
18,769
26,896
7,921
529
2,500
1,764
784
841
49
400
1,936
5,239
S02, lb/106 Btu
RMa
0.390
1.800
2.430
1.940
0.660
0.480
0.450
0.270
0.740
0.320
0.680
0.330
0.874
Mb
0.47.5
1.240
2.110
1.720
0.617
0.442
0.319
0.159
0.896
0.316
0.499
0.487
0.736
Diff.
'(XI)
0.085
-0.560
-0.320
-0.220
-0.040
-0.040
-0.130
-0.110
0.160
-0.004
-0.180
0.160
-0.080
xi2
0.0072
0.3136
0.1024
0.0484
0.0016
0.0016
0.0172
0.0121
0.0256
0.00002
0.0328
0.0256
0.0490
U)
I
         95% confidence interval
         System relative accuracy
0.137 Ib 502/10° Btu
23.1% of RM
          a Reference method value.
          " Monitor value.

-------
     No retests were  scheduled  because  FGD operation was  likely
to differ from that of the test period for two reasons:
     1.   The boiler  loads were expected  to be reduced  with the
          onset of warmer weather.
     2.   The lime used  in the  FGD system and purchased for the
          test was nearly depleted, and the system was scheduled
          to  returned to  limestone operation  in early  April.

3.2  CONTINUOUS SULFUR DIOXIDE DATA
3.2.1  Data Listings

15-Minute Readings—
     Computer printouts list complete 15-minute readings showing
the wet  basis FGD inlet  and outlet S02  and 02  concentrations,
the moisture  content  of each  gas  stream tested, and  the  cor-
rected (dry  basis)  inlet and outlet S02   and  O2  values.   Inlet
and outlet emission rates  (Ib S02/106  Btu) and FGD system effi-
ciencies  are  calculated  and  listed  on  an  hourly  basis.   These
listings are presented in Appendix A.

1-Hour Averages—
     The 1-hour averages of  inlet and outlet emission rates and
FGD efficiency  were  averaged  for  two  periods:   January  25 to
March  1  and  March  2  to 19.   The total  averages for the two
periods  were  calculated from available hourly values  for days
when data were collected for 18 or more hours and are presented
in Tables  3-30  and 3-31.  Daily hourly  listings  are presented
with the appendix included in this volume.
                               3-38

-------
TABLE  3-30.   SUMMARY  OF RESULTS USING 1-HOUR AVERAGES,
              JANUARY  25 TO MARCH  1,  1980
                30 UPERATINli UAYS

                USING 1-HOUR AVERAGES

                                           1.900
                OATEI  i-25-eo
                               t _______ L       tFF
                                IN      OUT
        • AVERAGES      7|9. »22.    ««b.    «26.
        I OF DATA       100.  66.     69.     %9.
        MINIMUM   .       if).   i.OZO    ,V<»7  77.940
        MAXIMUM         I3«.   fc.93%   1.166  90.207
        MEAN            110.   5.360    .436  91.966
                 ___ ta,
        I  8TO.OEV.        9.   S.724  «1.<33   3.710

        10-0*1  ALMUVAU £f IC1LN£T USING
                I
         IMEAN]   E  , I     I 91.9021
        ___ 10  IU   OUT

                    T
         WTI.L. (ME ANJ  is p|f Ji^Ey A.5?
                    I
              THE MEAN FOR • OATS USING T-MUUH
                            3-39

-------
TABLE 3-31.   SUMMARY OF RESULTS USING 1-HOUR AVERAGES,
                MARCH 2 TO  MARCH 19, 1980
                 IT OPERATING  DATS
                 SUMMAKT  OF  WESUI.TS
                 USING I-HOUR  AVERAGES

                 lucujphj JICKEMB ACKER ara. mo   ._.
                 DATES   3-  Z-
                        LOAD  .. I	E       iff
                                IN      OUT
         0 AVERAGES      «08.  561.
         X OF DATA       100.   93.
         MINIMUM  .
         MAXIMUM
         MEAN
         S 9TO.OEV.       IS.    •.•10
         30-DAT  «£NOV»L CFJCILNCT U31HC
                I
         fMEAMI   C  « C     I  90.SI7S
               10  IX   BUT
              . INEANJ   J^pEr^fy  AS:
                     •
               THE MEAN FOR I  DATS US INC V-MOUR AVERAGES
                             3-40

-------
24 Hour Averages—
     The 24-hour  (daily)  averages of inlet and outlet  emission
rates and FGD system efficiency were also calculated for the  two
periods and are presented  in  Tables 3-32 and  3-33.   As  with  the
1-hour averages,  data  were included only for days  that  met  the
minimum data capture requirement of 18 hours.

Frequency Distributions—
     Histograms were plotted  and  demonstrate  the  variability of
1-hour and  24-hour data.  These  are presented in  the  appendix
included in this volume.
3.2.2  Omitted Data
     There were  three  basic  reasons  that data periods  did  not
appear in the above listings or calculations.

Absence  of Data  Caused by  Process  Shutdown  or  CEM  Failure--
     During these  occurrences no data were available  for list-
ing.   During occurrences  where  only one  parameter (inlet or
outlet  readings)  was   omitted,   the  other,   if  available,  was
listed.  These instances were caused by periods  of CEM sampling
interface  failing in  the  case of  the  affected  parameter,  but
continuing to  operate  in the  case  of the unaffected parameter.
FGD efficiency data could not be calculated in such cases.

Unrepresentative Process Operation—
     During periods when the  FGD  system was being operated in a
manner that did  not reflect normal operational process control,
                                3-41

-------
TABLE 3-32.   SUMMARY  OF  RESULTS USING  24-HOUR AVERAGES,
               JANUARY 25 TO MARCH 1, 1980
              30 UPDATING DATS
              SUMMAKY  OF  KtSULTb
              USING  24-HOUR  AVERA6ES
              OAUI
         JUTE
LOAD
L	
 IN
                                      tFf
                                     OUT
          i-26-eo
          1-27-60
          1-2B-00
          i-31-eo
          2- i-eo
    2-26-60
    2-27-60     120.
    _2-?B_-«0 _   Jl*^_
    2-29-60     ||3.
    3-  1-60     121.   5.336
                                             90. b
      « OF DATA
      MINIMUM
      MAI|MUM
      MEAN
                       SO.
                121.
                110.
                	71
       27.
       • 7.
        4.7IU
        5.710
        5.375
                              22.
                              71.
               19.
               61.
 I 3TO.DEV.

 *O-I>AY
      24
 IMEAN)    t
	U	1
                        ft.
               9i.975
          .4)7  91.946
                2. 03ft
                2.216
              _..^aot
               23.730
                      CriCILNCT USING
                  , C     t 91.»76»
                   .. .0111 ___ _____ _________
             IMEANJ  is uEFINEu AS:
                  i
             THE MEAN rON I OAT» USIMC f-MUUK AVthACCS
                           3-42

-------
TABLE 3-33.   SUMMARY OF  RESULTS USING  24-HOUR AVERAGES,
                MARCH 2 TO MARCH 19, 1980
             17 UPtRAUNG DAYS
             SUMMARY OF RESULTS
             USING 24-HOUft AVERAGES
 	.LOCATION!
     OATEI   3- 2-00

DATE        LOAD
                                   -AFB.4900
                            f	
                             IN
       tFF
OUT
lv P— 00
- 3-60
- 4-00
J- b-80
- 6-60
- 7-80
* AvAO
- 9-00
-10-60
-11-60
-13-60
•14-00
-1S-80
-16-00
-17-60
-16-60
•19-00
• AUFBACFl
\ OF DATA
MINIMUM
MEAN
STO.DEV.
t ITD.DtV.
130. f.*74
125. .259
110. .986
102. .201
116. .502
104. .916
fA4. »*«•»
114. .00U
107. .sei
104. .026
120. .924
IOTT T|4T
99. .227
96. .935
02. .620
93. 4.462
IT. Ifc-
55. 52.
02. 4.482
130. ...-i.r>o<2
100. 4.965
12. .207
_JUJu«*.
.462
.300
.430
^350
_JUI***.
*»»**•
••••••
»•*•••
*«••*«
.309
.649
.661
!441
35.
.300
.087
.467
.141
tHft*
91.3
93.6
91.9
90.9
93.4
• *»••
• •*•*
• *»•»
*••••
.. 06,
67.
06.
92.
90.
32.
66.630
93.790
90.551
2.640
      SO-DAY  REMOVAL EFICItNCV USING
           24.     __          	
      IMEANJ   E   , E     I 90.5B«U
           30  IN  OUT
      NOTE!  (MEAN)   IS DEFINED AS:
                  X
            THE MEAN FOR I OATS USING Y-HUUK AVERAGES
                           3-43

-------
data were  not included in the data  listings.   Where  available,
they are listed in Appendix A,  but were not used in calculations
concerning 1-hour and 24-hour averages of FGD performance.

Failure to Obtain a Sufficient Data Base for Computation—
     At least two 15-minute readings per hour were necessary for
an hourly  reading to be  computed in the  initial  data listing,
and at least eighteen 1-hour averages of a parameter were needed
for data to be included into the summaries of 1-hour and 24-hour
results.
3.2.3  Process Operations Affecting 502 Emission Rates—

Inlet Emission Rates—
     Inlet  S02  emission  rates  were  affected  primarily by  the
sulfur  content  of the coal  burned.   Peabody Coal  Company  sup-
plied the  coal  from the beginning of  the  test  through February
28, whereas  Yancy Minerals  supplied  the coal  from February 29
through  the  end  of the  test.   Because of  a  3-  to  5-day  lag
between  delivery  and burning of  coal,  the data  collected  from
January  25  through March 1  can  be viewed  as  representative of
the coal  supplied by the  first  vendor, and  the  data collected
from March 2  through 19  as representative of a mixture of  coals
from both vendors.

Outlet Emission Rates—
     Outlet  S02  rates  reflect   FGD   system  efficiency,  which
varied according to the lime feed rate.  Section 4 describes the
FGD process and control practices.

                               3-44

-------
3.3  DATA CAPTURE AND LOSS
     Table 3-34  lists  the daily hours of data capture  and loss
from January  25..to March 19, and Table  3-35  summarizes process
and CEM  operations.   The performance of the FGD  system and CEM
affected data capture and are described below.
3.3.1  FGD System Performance
     Total operating  data showed that  FGD  system availability,
reliability,   and  operability  were  all  99.5  percent  and that
utilization was  99.3 percent;  however,  69  hours  (5.3 percent of
the total FGD  system  operating time) was not regarded as reipre-
sentative of  normal  process control  and was excluded  from the
data base.   The  periods  excluded  were  times when mechanical
breakdowns caused  loss of lime  feed and thus reduction of S02
removal efficiency.
3.3.2  CEM Performance

CEM Operability—
     Total data  from  January 25 to March 19 show that CEM inlet
operability was  87.1  percent,  outlet  operability was 81.1 per-
cent and total system operability (concurrent operation of inlet
and outlet monitors) was 78.0 percent.

CEM Downtime—
     A breakdown of the  causes for inlet and outlet data  losses
due to CEM failures is shown in Tables 3-36 and 3-37.
                               3-45

-------
                                 TABLE 3-34.  DAILY DATA CAPTURE AND LOSS
                                        (hours except as indicated)
Data
day
No.
1
2
3
4


5
6


7
8



9

10
Date
in
1980
1/25
1/26
1/27
1/28
1/29
1/30
1/31
2/1
2/2
2/3
2/4
2/5
2/6
2/7
2/8
2/9
2/10
2/11
Normal
process
operation
24
24
18
23
24
24
24
22
11
20
24
24
18
0
13
24
24
24
Process
downtime
(abnormal
operation)
0
0
6b
1C
0
0
0
2g
13n
4g
0
0
6t
24*
llk
0
0
0
Inlet
data
capture
20
24
24
23
14
13
22
24
21
21
22
23
12
23
23
24
14
24
Outlet
data
capture
20
24
18
23
14
13
22
22
11
17
22
21
6
0
11
24
14
24
Efficiency
data
capture
20
24
18
23
14
13
22
22
10
17
22
21
6
0
11
24
14
24
02
monitor
downtime
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.
3h
3h
0
0
°h
ln
0
0
0
0
S02
monitor
downtime
0
0
0
°d
10°
lle
2f
0
0
0
21
lj
0
o
I
0
0
0
Sampling
interface
downtime
4a,
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2"
12J
0
0
0.
10J
0
U)
I
   (continued)

-------
     TABLE  3-34  (continued)
Data
day
No.
11

12


13
14
15







16
17
18
19
Date
in
1980
2/12
2/13
2/14
2/15
2/16
2/17
2/18
2/19
2/20
2/21
2/22
2/23
2/24
2/25
2/26
2/27
2/28
2/29
3/1
Normal
process
operation
24
24
24
24
24
23
22
24
24
24
18
24
24
24
24
22
24
24
24
Process
downtime
(abnormal
operation)
0
0
0
0
0
1C
2C
0
0
0
6q
0
0
0
0
2r
0
0
0
Inlet
data
capture
24
23
24
23
24
24
24
24
12
13
15
4
9
15
17
22
24
24
19
Outlet
data
capture
24
17
24
13
9
23
22
24
23
22
15
4
9
15
24
22
24
24
19
Efficiency
data
capture
24
17
24
13
9
23
22
24
12
13
15
4
9
15
17
22
24
24
19
02
monitor
downtime
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.
*h
!h
3
20h
15h
9n
0
0
0
0
5h
S02
monitor
downtime
0
lm
0
ln
0
0
0
0
on
lp
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sampl ing
interface
downtime
0.
6^
0.
ID-!
15J
0
0
on
12°
11P
0
0
0
on
7°
0
0
0
0
u>
 I
      (continued)

-------
    TABLE 3-34 (continued)
Data
day
No.


20
21
22
23
24







25
26
27
28
29
Date
in
1980
3/2

3/3
3/4
3/5
3/6
3/7
3/8
3/9
3/10
3/11
3/12
3/13
3/14
3/15
3/16
3/17
3/18
3/19
Normal
process
operation
24

24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
Process
downtime
(abnormal
operation)
0

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Inlet
data
capture
24

24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
22
12
23
14
24
24
24
24
24
Outlet
data
capture
17

21
24
24
24
24
12
10
15
12
0
17
24
24
24
24
24
24
Efficiency
data
capture
17

21
24
24
24
24
12
10
15
12
0
17
14
24
24
24
24
24
monitor
downtime
0

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
12s
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
S02
monitor
downtime
0

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sampling
interface
downtime
7J"
j
3J
0
0
0
0.
12^
14J!
gJ
12J!
12J. .
7J.t
10U
0
0
0
0
0
*>
00

-------
a Installed gas conditioner (permeation dryer) failed and caused loss of sample.   Device was removed after
  failure.
  Loss of lime slaker resulted in poor FGD performance.
c Temporary low lime feed rate to system.
  Seven hours lost because the sample timer was off, 3 hours lost because of zero card maintenance.

f
Ten hours -lost because of the sample timer, 1 hour lost because of an integrity check.
  Audit checks performed.
^ Lime slaker maintenance.
  Oxygen recorder chart drive stuck.
  Ultraviolet bulb changed.
^ Outlet probe filter plugged.
if
  Lime slaker down for repairs.
  Calibration test.
m Sample cell windows were cleaned.
  Calibration checks, routine maintenance.
° Inlet blowback valve leak.
" Inlet blowback valve leak and repair.
" FGD system down for repairs.
  Boilers down.
s Oil in outlet line caused false reading.
  Power disconnected to probes for 1 hour.
  Inlet probe tube plugged.

-------
        TABLE 3-35.   SUMMARY OF PROCESS AND CEM OPERATIONS
                            DURING TEST
          Parameter
Hours
Total time in operating period

Total boiler operating time

Total FGD system operating time

Total time of representative FGD system operation

Total inlet data capture time

Total outlet data capture time

Total efficiency data capture time

02 monitor downtime

S02 monitor downtime

Inlet sampling interface downtime

Outlet sampling interface downtime

Simultaneous downtime of inlet and outlet
 sampling interface

FGD system downtime

Boiler downtime

Total time of unrepresentative FGD system operation
1320

1318

1311

1242

1142

1007

 969

  73

  30

  52

 116


  19

   7

   2

  69
                                3-50

-------
                      TABLE  3-36.  INLET DATA LOSS
No. of
hours lost
4
17
3
5
54
2
16
1
12
23
7
10
5
Total 159
No. of
occurrences
1
1
1
4
9
1
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
27
Description
Testing of gas conditioner
Timer off
Zero card maintenance
Integrity, audit, calibra-
tion checks
Chart drive sticking, 02
recorder
Change ultraviolet lamp bulb
Outlet interface failure and
correction
S02 sample cell dirty
Oil in plant air
Blowback valve leak
Blowback solenoid valve
failure
Inlet probe plugged
02 recorder chart paper out

Remedy
a
Turned timer on
a
a
Repaired chart
drive
a
a
Cleaned cell
plant performed
maintenance
Repaired leak
Replaced valve
Replaced probe
New roll paper

Not applicable.
                                   3-51

-------
                      TABLE 3-37.  OUTLET DATA LOSS

No. of
hours lost
4
17
3
4
55
2
131
1
1
12
5
Total 235
No. of
occurrences
resulting in
data loss
1
1
1
3
10
1
13
1
1
1
1
34

Description
Testing gas conditioner
Timer off
Zero card maintenance
Integrity audit, calibration
Chart drive sticking, 02 re-
corder
Change ultraviolet lamp bulb
Outlet probe filter plugged
Inlet blowback repairs
Sample cell dirty
Oil in plant air
02 recorder paper out


Remedy
a
Turned timer on
a
a
Repaired chart
drive
a
Changed filter
a
Cleaned all
Plant performed
maintenance
Replaced roll

Not applicable.
                                    3-52

-------
CEM Problems—
     The  only apparently unsolvable  problem that occured  with
CEM operations  was  the recurrence of outlet probe filter plug-
gage.    The remedy  for  the  problem  was replacement  of probe
filters when  they showed  signs  of plugging,  but this was gener-
ally  an  unsatisfactory  solution  because  pluggage   frequently
occurred  at night,  when CEM operators were not present.  Large
periods of data loss in  excess of 6 hours per  24-hour  day re-
sulted.  Two  major  factors contributed  to the  high incidence of
this problem:
     1.   High mist  carryover  from the  FGD process  through the
          test  period.   This was  evidenced by  a very  obvious
          rainout downwind of the  stack  and heavy accumulations
          of wet slurry on the outlet probe.
     2.   Oil in the probe filter blowback air  supply.   This was
          discovered only once  in  the  test  period, but probably
          contributed to  the unusually high incidence  of probe
          pluggage from March 8 through 12.

3.4  QUALITY ASSURANCE
     A  quality  assurance (QA)  program was performed to support
the reliability of  the  data  between initial and final P/S test-
ing.   In  addition to the records of CEM operation summarized in
Subsection 3.3,  two levels of testing were performed.  The first
level  consisted of  ongoing  24-hour zero and  calibration drift
tests  for  the entire period  of January 25 through March 18, and
the second consisted of manual methods tests for system relative
accuracy and CEM moisture values.
                               3-53

-------
3.4.1  CEM 24 Hour Drift Tests
     The 24-hour  zero  and calibration  drift  tests of both  S02
monitor ranges and  of  the 02  monitor were performed on a weekly
basis.  Data represent 24-hour S02 monitor drift from February 7
to  March  13  and  24-hour  02  monitor drift  from January  31  to
March 13.   Table 3-38 summarizes the weekly QA test results,  and
Tables 3-39 through 3-54, provide detailed results.
3.4.2  System Relative Accuracy Tests
     System relative  accuracy tests were performed  on a weekly
basis  throughout  the  test  period.    Between  January  25  and
February 22,  the  weekly  schedule  was  not followed  because  the
primary effort  was  directed  toward completion  of  initial  P/S
tests.  The results of the QA system relative accuracy tests are
presented  in  Table  3-55,  and  Table  3-56 summarizes  these  re-
sults.
3.4.3  CEM Sample Mositure Determinations
     The CEM  moisture values  used in  calculations  were deter-
mined from manual  tests  and checked to ensure that they did not
exceed  the lowest  dewpoint before analysis  in the 02  and S02
monitors.   The values are presented in Table 3-57.
     Manual  methods  results   obtained  during  system  relative
accuracy tests  were used in all  cases  except during the period
from February 12 through March 5 when manual determinations were
made  at the CEM monitor for  the  outlet  stream.   This was done
because the  low  dewpoint  determination  did not appear  to  be
                               3-54

-------
             TABLE 3-38.   SUMMARY OF WEEKLY  QA  TEST  RESULTS FOR
                     24-HOUR ZERO AND CALIBRATION  DRIFT
Weekly
period
in 1980
1/31-2/7
2/7-2/14
2/14-2/21
2/21-2/28
2/28-3/6
3/6-3/13
Low- range S02 monitor
24-hour drift
Zero,
% of scale
a
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.4
0.3b
Calibration,
% of scale
a
1.0
1.0
0.9
1.0
l.lb
High- range S02 moniti
24-hour drift
Zero,
% of span
a
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0b
Calibration,
% of span
a
0.7
1.0
1.1
1.1
1.2b
>r 02 monitor
24-hour drift
Zero,
vol. % 02
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.03
0.00b
Calibration,
vol. % 02
0.06
0.18
0.18
0.13
0.06
0.48b
.  Data presented in P/S test results.
  Data overlap final P/S data.
                                     3-55

-------
                       TABLE  3-39.   QA  TEST  RESULTS  FOR  LOW-RANGE  (OUTLET)  SO,..MONITOR
                          24-HOUR  ZERO  AND CALIBRATION DRIFT,  FEBRUARY 7  THROUGH 14a
                                      (% of  scale  except as  indicated)
Test
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Test date
Start
2/7
2/8
2/9
2/10
2/11
2/12
2/13
End
2/8
2/9
2/10
2/11
2/12
2/13
2/14
Time
Start
2130
1300
1530
1430
1100
2300
2300
End
1300
1530
1430
1100
2300
2300
1515
Zero reading
Start
(A)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
End
(B)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Arithmetic mean
95% confidence interval
24-hour drift,b %
Zero
drift
(C=B-A)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Span reading
Start
(D)
86.2
86.3
85.8
86.8
85.6
86.0
85.7
End
(E)
86.3
85.8
86.8
85.6
86.8
85.7
85.0
Span
drift
(F-E-D)
0.1
-0.5
1.0
-1.2
1.2
-0.3
-0.7



Cali-
bration
drift
(G=F-C)
0.1
-0.5
1.0
-1.2
1.2
-0.3
-0.7
-0.06
0.82
1.03
U)

Ul
               'Calibration concentration of 427 ppm S02 and scale from 0 to 500 ppm S02-
                See Subsection 6.2.3 for explanation of units.

-------
                        TABLE 3-40.  QA TEST RESULTS FOR LOW-RANGE (OUTLET) S02 MONITOR
                          24-HOUR ZERO AND CALIBRATION DRIFT, FEBRUARY 14 THROUGH 21 a

                                       (% of scale except as indicated)
Test.
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Test date

Start
2/14
2/15
2/16
2/17
2/18
2/19
2/20

End
2/15
2/16
2/17
2/18
2/19
2/20
2/21
Time

Start
1515
1600
1515
1430
1315
1100
2000

End
1600
1515
1430
1315
1100
2000
1615
Zero reading
Start
(A)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
End
(B)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Arithmetic mean
95% confidence interval
24-hour drift,b %
Zero
drift
(C=B-A)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Span reading
Start
(D)
85.0
86.3
86.3
85.9
85.7
86.2
85.9
End
(E)
86.3
86.3
87.1
85.7
86.2
85.9
86.3
Span
drift
(F=E-D)
1.3
0.0
0.8
-0.2
0.5
-0.3
0.4



Cali-
bration
drift
(G=F-C)
1.3
0.0
0.8
-0.2
0.5
-0.3
0.4
0.36
0.53
1.04
OJ
I
tn
            Calibration gas concentration of 427 ppm S02 and scale from 0 to 500 ppm

            See Subsection 6.2.3 for explanation of units.

-------
                         TABLE 3-41.  QA TEST RESULTS FOR LOW-RANGE (OUTLET) S02 MONITOR
                           24-HOUR ZERO AND CALIBRATION DRIFT, FEBRUARY 21 THROUGH 28a
                                        (% of scale except as indicated)
u>
U1
00
Test
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Test date
Start
2/21
2/22
2/23
2/24
2/25
2/26
2/27
End
2/22
2/23
2/24
2/25
2/26
2/27
2/28
Time
.Start
1615
1530
1445
1500
1700
2000
2245
End
1530
1445
1500
1700
2000
2245
2300
Zero reading
Start
(A)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
-0.2
0.0
End
(B)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
-0.2
0.0
0.0
Arithmetic mean
95% confidence interval
24-hour drift.,b %
Zero
drift
(C=B-A)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
-0.2
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Span reading
Start
(D)
86.3
86.7
87.0
86.0
85.3
86.5
86.4
End
(E)
86.7
87.0
86.0
85.3
86.5
86.4
86.5
Span
drift
(F=E-D)
0.4
0.3
-1.0
-0.7
1.2
-0.1
0.1


Cali-
bration
drift
(G=F-C)
0.4
0.3
-1.0
-0.7
1.4
-0.3
0.1
0.03
0.74
0.90
               alibration gas concentration of 427 ppm S02 and scale from 0 to 500 ppm S02-
                  Subsection 6.2.3 for explanation of units.

-------
                        TABLE 3-42.  QA TEST RESULTS FOR LOW-RANGE (OUTLET) SO? MONITOR.
                        24-HOUR ZERO AND CALIBRATION DRIFT, FEBRUARY 28 THROUGH MARCH 6£

                                       (% of scale except as indicated)
Test
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Test date
Start
2/28
2/29
3/1
3/2
3/3
3/4
3/5
End
2/29
3/1
3/2
3/3
3/4
3/5
3/6
Time
.Start
2300
1730
1415
1545
1200
1845
1800
End
1730
1415
1545
1200
1845
1800
1745
Zero reading
Start
(A)
0.0
0.0
0.3
-0.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
End
(B)
0.0
0.3
-0.4
0.0
0.0
-0.2
0.0
Arithmetic mean
95% confidence interval
24-hour drift^ %
Zero
drift
(C=B-A)
0.0
0.3
-0.7
0.4
0.0
-0.2
0.0
-0.03
0.33
0.36
Span reading
Start
(D)
86.5
86.2
86.4
85.4
86.0
86.0
86.4
End
(E)
87.5
86.4
85.4
86.0
85.0
86.6
86.6
Span
drift
(F=E-D)
1.0
0.2
-1.0
1.0
-1.0
0.6
0.2



Cali-
bration
drift
(G=F-C)
1.0
-0.1
0.6
-0.4
-1.0
0.8
0.2
0.16
0.66
0.96
U)
I
01
vo
           Calibration gas concentration of 427 ppm S02 and scale from 0 to 500 ppm SO,,,

            See Subsection 6.2.3 for explanation of units.

-------
                      TABLE 3-43.   QA TEST RESULTS FOR LOW-RANGE (OUTLET) SO? MONITOR
                       24-HOUR ZERO AND CALIBRATION DRIFT,  MARCH 6 THROUGH MARCH 13a

                                     (% of scale except as  indicated)
Test
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Test date

Start
3/6
3/7
3/8
3/9
3/10
3/11
3/12

End
3/7
3/8
3/9
3/10
3/11
3/12
3/13
Time

.Start
1745
1700
1430
1445
1745
2045
2045

End
1700
1430
1445
1745
2045
2045
2145
Zero reading
Start
(A)
0.0
-0.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.4
End
(B)
-0.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.4
0.2
Arithmetic mean
95% confidence interval
24-hour drift,b %
Zero
drift
(C=B-A)
-0.4
0.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.4
-0.2
0.03
0.22
0.25
Span reading
Start
(D)
86.6
85.6
86.1
86.7
86.0
87.0
86.5
End
(E)
85.6
86.1
86.7
85.3
87.0
86.5
85.6
Span
drift
(F=E-D)
-1.0
0.5
0.6
-1.4
1.0
-0.5
-0.9



Cali-
bration
drift
(G=F-C)
0.3
0.1
0.6
-1.4
1.0
-0.9
-0.7
-0.14
0.81
1.11
U)

o>
o
        'Calibration  gas  concentration  of  427  ppm  S02  and  scale  from 0 to 500 ppm S02<

        JSee  Subsection 6.2.3 for  explanation  of units.

-------
u>
I
en
                            TABLE  3-44.   QA  TEST  RESULTS  FOR HIGH-RANGE  (INLET) SO?  MONITOR

                               24-HOUR ZERO  AND CALIBRATION DRIFT,  FEBRUARY  7  THROUGH  143

                                          (% of  scale  except as  indicated)
Test
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Test date
Start
2/7
2/8
2/9
2/19
2/11
2/12
2/13
End
2/8
2/9
2/10
2/11
2/12
2/13
2/14
Time
•Start
2130
1300
1530
1430
1100
2300
2300
End
1300
1530
1430
1100
2300
2300
1515
Zero reading
Start
(A)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
-0.1
End
(B)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
-0.1
0.0
Arithmetic mean
95% confidence interval
24-hour drift,b %
Zero
drift
(C=B-A)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
-0.1
0.1
0.00
0.05
0.05
Span reading
Start
(D)
84.0
84.3
83.7
84.0
83.7
84.7
84.3
End
(E)
84.4
83.7
84.0
83.7
84.7
84.3
83.7
Span
drift
(F-E-D)
0.4
-0.6
0.3
-0.3
1.0
-0.4
-0.6


Cali-
bration
drift
(G=F-C)
0.4
-0.6
0.3
-0.3
1.0
-0.3
-0.7
-0.03
0.57
0.70
               Calibration gas concentration of 4250 ppm S02 and scale from 0 to 5000 ppm

               See Subsection 6.2.3 for explanation of units.

-------
                          TABLE 3-45.  QA TEST RESULTS FOR HIGH RANGE (INLET) S02 MONITOR

                                24-HOUR ZERO AND CALIBRATION DRIFT3, FEBRUARY 14-21
W
I

to
Test
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Test date
Start
2/14
2/15
2/16
2/17
2/18
2/19
2/20
End
2/15
2/16
2/17
2/18
2/19
2/20
2/21
Time
.Start
1515
1600
1515
1430
1315
1100
2000
End
1600
1515
1430
1315
1100
2000
1615
Zero reading
Start
(A)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
End
(B)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Arithmetic mean
95% confidence interval
24-hour drift , percent
Zero
drift
(C=B-A)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Span reading
Start
(D)
83.7
84.4
84.9
84.0
84.8
83.7
84.0
End
(E)
84.4
84.9
84.0
84.8
83.7
84.0
84.4
Span
drift
(F=E-D)
0.7
0.5
-0.9
0.8
-1.1
0.3
0.4


Cali-
bration
drift
(G=F-C)
0.7
0.5
-0.9
0.8
-1.1
0.3
0.4
0.1
0.71
0.95
            Calibration gas concentration of 4250 ppm SO, and scale from 0 to 5000 ppm S09<
            h
             See Subsection 6.2.3 for explanation of units.

-------
                         TABLE 3-46.  QA TEST RESULTS FOR HIGH-RANGE (INLET) SO? MONITOR
                           24-HOUR ZERO AND CALIBRATION DRIFT, FEBRUARY 21 THROUGH 28a

                                        (% of scale except as indicated)
Ul
U)
Test
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Test date
Start
2/21
2/22
2/23
2/24
2/25
2/26
2/27
End
2/22
2/23
2/24
2/25
2/26
2/27
2/28
Time
Start
1615
1530
1445
1500
1700
2000
2245
End
1530
1445
1500
1700
2000
2245
2300
Zero reading
Start
(A)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
-0.1
0.0
End
(8)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
-0.1
0.0
0.0
Arithmetic mean
95% confidence interval
24-hour drift,b %
Zero
drift
(C=B-A)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
-0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.05
0.05
Span reading
Start
(D)
84.4
83.2
84.0
84.0
83.0
84.3
83.8
End
(E)
83.2
84.0
84.0
83.0
84.3
83.8
83.8
Span
drift
(F=E-D)
-1.2
0.8
0.0
-1.0
1.3
-0.5
0.0


Cali-
bration
drift
(G=F-C)
-1.2
0.8
0.0
-1.0
1.4
-0.6
0.0
-0.08
0.87
1.12
            Calibration gas concentration of 4250 ppm SOp and scale from 0 to 5000 ppm

           DSee Subsection 6.2.3 for explanation of units.

-------
              TABLE  3-47.   QA TEST  RESULTS FOR HIGH-RANGE  (INLET)  SO?  MONITOR
              24-HOUR ZERO  AND CALIBRATION DRIFT,  FEBRUARY  28  THROUGH  MARCH  69
                             (% of scale except as  indicated)
Test
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Test date
Start
2/28
2/29
3/11
3/2
3/3
3/4
3/5
End
2/29
3/1
3/2
3/3
3/4
3/5
3/6
Time
Start
2300
1730
1415
1545
1200
1845
1800
End
1730
1415
1545
1200
1845
1800
1745
Zero reading
Start
(A)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
-0.2
0.0
0.0
End
(B)
0.0
0.0
0.0
-0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
Arithmetic mean
95% confidence interval
24-hour drift,b %
Zero
drift
(C=B-A)
0.0
0.0
0.0
-0.2
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.11
0.11
Span reading
Start
(D)
83.8
83.7
83.6
83.4
83.6
83.9
84.2
End
(E)
85.3
83.6
83.4
83.6
81.9
84.4
84.0
Span
drift
(F=E-D)
1.5
-0.1
-0.2
0.2
-1.7
0.5
-0.2


Cali-
bration
drift
(G=F-C)
1.5
-0.1
-0.2
0.4
-1.9
0.5
-0.2
0.00
0.95
1.12
'Calibration  gas  concentration  of  4250  ppm SO,,  and  scale  from  0  to  5000  ppm  S02-

3See  Subsection 6.2.3 for explanation of units.

-------
                          TABLE 3-48.  QA TEST RESULTS FOR HIGH-RANGE (INLET) S02 MONITOR
                           24-HOUR ZERO AND CALIBRATION DRIFT, MARCH 6 THROUGH MARCH  13a


                                         (% of scale except as indicated)
OJ
i

-------
                           TABLE  3-49.  QA TEST  RESULTS FOR 02 MONITOR  24-HOUR  ZERO  AND

                                 CALIBRATION  DRIFT, JANUARY 31 THROUGH  FEBRUARY ?a


                                         (% of scale except as indicated)
U)
 I
Test
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Test date
Start
1/31
2/1
2/2
2/3
2/4
2/5
2/6
End
2/1
2/2
2/3
2/4
2/5
2/6
2/7
Time
.-Start
0900
0915
1400
1430
1600
1830
1648
End
0915
1400
1430
1600
1830
1648
2130
Zero reading
Start
(A)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
End
(B)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Arithmetic mean
95% confidence interval
24-hour drift,b % 02
Zero
drift
(C=B-A)
0.0
o.o -
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Span reading
Start
(D)
86.7
86.5
86.5
86.5
86.5
86.5
86.5
End
(E)
86.5
86.5
86.5
86.5
86.5
86.5
87.0
Span
drift
(F=E-D)
-0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
"0.0
0.0
0.5


Cali-
bration
drift
(G=F-C)
-0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.5
0.04
0.20
0.06
             Calibration  gas  concentration  of  20.95% 0~ and scale  from  0  to  25%

            'Percent  0? = (|AM|  + CIg5)  x 0.25.

-------
                          TABLE  3-50.   QA TEST RESULTS FOR 02 MONITOR 24-HOUR ZERO AND
                                    CALIBRATION DRIFT, FEBRUARY 7 THROUGH 14a


                                        (% of scale except as indicated)
Test
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Test date
Start
2/7
2/8
2/9
2/10
2/11
2/12
2/13
End
2/8
2/9
2/10
2/11
2/12
2/13
2/14
Time
Start
2130
1300
1530
1430
1100
2300
2300
End
1300
1530
1430
1100
2300
2300
1515
Zero reading
Start
(A)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
End
(B)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Arithmetic mean
95% confidence interval
24-hour drift,b % 02
Zero
drift
(C=B-A)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Span reading
Start
(D)
87.0
87.0
87.1
85.8
86.9
87.0
87.0
End
(E)
87.0
87.1
85.8
86.9
87.0
87.0
86.5
Span
drift
(F=E-D)
0.0
0.1
-1.3
1.1
0.1
0.0
-0.5



Cali-
bration
drift
(G=F-C)
0.0
0.1
-1.3
1.1
0.1
0.0
-0.5
-0.07
0.67
0.18
U)
 I
cr>
            Calibration gas concentration of 20.95% 0~ and scale from 0 to 25 percent Op.

           'Percent 0  = (|AM| + CI) x 0.25.
                                   g5

-------
                         TABLE 3-51.  QA TEST RESULTS FOR 02 MONITOR  24-HOUR  ZERO  AND
                              CALIBRATION DRIFT, FEBRUARY 14 THORUGH  FEBRUARY 21a

                                       (% of scale except as indicated)
Test
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Test date
Start
2/14
2/15
2/16
2/17
2/18
2/19
2/20
End
2/15
2/16
2/17
2/18
2/19
2/20
2/21
Time
.Start
1515
1600
1515
1430
1315
1100
2000
End
1600
1515
1430
1315
1100
2000
1615
Zero reading
Start
(A)
0.0
0.0
-0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
End
(B)
0.0
-0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Arithmetic mean
95% confidence interval
24-hour drift, b % 02
Zero
drift
(C=B-A)
0.0
-0.2
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.11
0.03
Span reading
Start
(D)
86.5
86.4
86.3
86.0
86.6
86.5
86.0
End
(E)
86.4
86.3
86.0
86.6
86.5
86.0
87.0
Span
drift
(F-E-D)
-0.1
-0.1
-0.3
0.6
-0.1
-0.5
-1.0


Cali-
bration
drift
(G=F-C)
-0.1
0.1
-0.5
0.6
-0.1
-0.5
-1.0
-0.21
0.47
0.18
Calibration gas concentration of 20.95 percent 0,, and scale from 0 to 25 percent 02.
Percent 02 = (|AM| + CIg5) x 0.25.
10
I
CTi
00

-------
                         TABLE 3-52.   QA TEST RESULTS  FOR  02 MONITOR  24-HOUR ZERO AND
                              CALIBRATION DRIFT,  FEBRUARY  21  THROUGH  FEBRUARY  283

                                        (% of scale except as indicated)
Test
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Test date
Start
2/21
2/22
2/23
2/24
2/25
2/26
2/27
End
2/22
2/23
2/24
2/25
2/26
2/27
2/28
Time
Start
1615
1530
1445
1500
1700
2000
2245
End
1530
1445
1500
1700
2000
2245
2300
Zero reading
Start
(A)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
End
(B)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Arithmetic mean
95% confidence interval
24-hour drift,b % 02
Zero
drift
(C=B-A)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Span reading
Start
(D)
87.0
87.0
87.0
86.0
86.0
86.0
86.0
End
(E)
87.0
87.0
86.0
86.0
86.0
86.0
86.7
Span
drift
(F=E-D)
0.0
0.0
-1.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.7


Cali-
bration
drift
(G=F-C)
0.0
0.0
-1.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.7
-0.04
0.46
0.13
vo
            Calibration gas concentration of 20.95 percent 02 and scale from 0 to  25  percent  02.
            Percent 02 = (|AM| + CIg5) x 0.25.

-------
               TABLE 3-53.  QA TEST RESULTS FOR 02 MONITOR 24-HOUR ZERO AND
                      CALIBRATION DRIFT, FEBRUARY 28 THROUGH MARCH 6a
                                of scale except as indicated)
Test
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Test date
Start
2/28
2/29
3/1
3/2
3/3
3/4
3/5
End
2/29
3/1
3/2
3/3
3/4
3/5
3/6
Time
Start
2300
1730
1415
1545
1200
1845
1800
End
1730
1415
1545
1200
1845
1800
1745
Zero reading
Start
(A)
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
End
(B)
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Arithmetic mean
95% confidence interval
24-hour drift,5 % 02
Zero
drift
(C=B-A)
0.2
-0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.11
0.03
Span reading
Start
(D)
86.7
87.0
86.7
86.9
86.8
87.0
86.7
End
(E)
87.0
86.7
86.9
86.8
87.0
86.7
86.9
Span
drift
(F=E-D)
0.3
-0.3
0.2
-0.1
0.2
-0.3
0.2



Cali-
bration
drift
(G=F-C)
0.1
-0.1
0.2
0.1
0.2
-0.3
0.2
0.06
0.18
0.06
 Calibration gas concentration of 20.95 percent 0? and  scale from 0 to 25 percent
bPercent 02 = (|AM|  + CIg5)  x 0.25.

-------
                          TABLE  3-54.   QA TEST RESULTS  FOR 02 MONITOR 24-HOUR ZERO AND
                                   CALIBRATION DRIFT, MARCH  6 THROUGH MARCH  13a

                                        (% of scale except as indicated)
Test
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Test date
Start
3/6
3/7
3/8
3/9
3/10
3/11
3/12
End
3/7
3/8
3/9
3/10
3/11
3/12
3/13
Time
Start
1745
1700
1430
1445
1745
2045
2045
End
1700
1430
1445
1745
2045
2045
2145
Zero reading
Start
(A)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
End
(B)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Arithmetic mean
95% confidence interval
24-hour drift,b % 02
Zero
drift
(C=B-A)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Span reading
Start
(P)
86.9
87.0
86.0
86.9
86.5
86.5
83.0
End
(E)
87.0
86.0
86.9
86.5
86.5
83.0
86.4
Span
drift
(F=E-D)
0.1
-0.1
0.9
-0.1
0.0
-3.5
3.4


Cali-
bration
drift
(G=F-C)
0.1
-0.1
0.9
-0.1
0.0
-3.5
3.4
0.10
1.87
0.49
U)
              Calibration gas concentration of 20.95% 02 and scale from 0 to 25% 02.
              Percent 02 = (|AM| + CIg5) x 0.25.

-------
                           TABLE 3-55.  QA TEST  RESULTS  FOR  SYSTEM RELATIVE ACCURACY1
Week
in
1980
1/27-2/2
1/27-2/2
1/27-2/2
2/3-2/9
2/3-2/9
2/3-2/9
2/3-2/9
2/10-2/16
2/10-2/16
2/10-2/16
2/10-2/16
2/10-2/16
2/10-2/16
2/24-3/1
2/24-3/1
2/24-3/1
2/24-3/1
2/24-3/1
2/24-3/1
3/2-3/8
3/2-3/8
3/2-3/8
3/2-3/8
3/2-3/8
3/2-3/8
Day
in
1980
2/1
2/1
2/1
2/5
2/5
2/6
2/6
2/12
2/12
2/12
2/13
2/13
2/13
2/26
2/26
2/26
2/27
2/27
2/27
3/6
3/6
3/6
3/6
3/6
3/6
Sampling
location
Outlet
Outlet
Outlet
Outlet
Outlet
Outlet
Outlet
Outlet
Outlet
Outlet
Outlet
Outlet
Outlet
Inlet
Inlet
Inlet
Outlet
Outlet
Outlet
Inlet
Inlet
Inlet
Outlet
Outlet
Outlet
Test
time
d
d
d
0941
1051
1446
1546
1757e
1857e
1957e
1057
1257
1357
1747o
1917e
2017e
1303
1433
1556
0902
1002
1122
1317e
1417
1527
02 vol. , %
RMb
12.0
13.7
13.3
14.5
12.0
12.6
12.7
14.2
14.2
14.0
14.0
14.0
14.0
12.6
d
d
12.2
12.0
11.9
12.8
13.2
15.5
12.8
12.8
13.0
Mc
12.6
13.9
12.6
14.4
12.3
13.1
13.5
13.3
13.2
13.2
13.0
12.1
13.0
12.7
12.8
12.9
12.2
12.1
11.7
13.3
13.9
16.0
14.4
13.0
13.6
S02, ppm
RMb
120
135
123
53
123
165
149
10
12
42
56
74
46
1121
983
894
145
182
200
1261
1225
814
d
217
188
MC
98
113
108
43
115
172
127
42
46
82
63
116
81
1297
1271
1263
110
154
134
1245
1164
768
152
180
139
S02, lb/106 Btu
RMb
0.45
0.59
0.55
0.28
0.46
0.67
0.61
0.02
0.02
0.09
0.271
0.36
0.22
4.54
d
d
0.56
0.69
0.75
5.24
5.35
5.07
d
0.90
0.80
MC
0.40
0.54
0.44
0.22
0.45
0.75
0.58
0.19
0.20
0.36
0.27
0.44
0.35
5.33
5.28
5.33
0.43
0.59
0.49
5.49
5.58
5.30
0.79
0.76
0.64
Diff.
-0.05
-0.05
-0.11
-0.055
-0.010
+0.76
-0.033
+0.167
+0.180
+0.264
-0.002
+0.083
+0.126
+0.79
d
d
-0.13
-0.10
-0.26
+0.25
+0.23
+0.23
d
-0.14
-0.16
Arithmetic
difference
mass/GCV


i






















% of RV


-12.9



-1.0





+24.5


+17.4


-24.5


+4.5


-17.5
u>
tsJ
    (continued)

-------
     TABLE 3-55  (continued)
Week
in
1980
3/9-3/15
3/9-3/15
3/9-3/15
3/9-3/15
3/9-3/15
3/9-3/15
3/9-3/15
3/9-3/15
Day
in
1980
3/13
3/13
3/13
3/13
3/13
3/13
3/13
3/13
Sampling
location
Inlet
Inlet
Inlet
Inlet
Outlet
Outlet
Outlet
Outlet
Test
time
1308
1458
1558
1718
1906
1546
1656
1816
02 vol. , %
RMb
12.8
12.4
12.8
12.6
13.0
13.0
13.0
12.7
MC
12.8
12.8
12.9
12.7
13.3
13.4
13.4
13.3
S02, ppm
RMb
1187
1165
1110
1182
167
72
141
136
MC
1193
1160
1130
1178
130
126
120
111
S02, lb/106 Btu
RMb
4.93
4.61
4.61
4.79
0.71
0.31
0.60
0.56
MC
4.93
4.82
4.75
4.83
0.58
0.56
0.53
0.49
Diff.
+0.00
+0.21
+0.14
+0.04
-0.13
+0.25
-0.07
-0.07
Arithmetic
di f fer^nrp
mass/GCV


l





% of RV



+2.1



-3.7
U)
 I
^J
U)
Results for February 17 to 23 and March 30 to April 5 were discussed in Subsection 3.1; during the
week of March 16 to 23, data were collected only for the 4 days from March 16 to 19; no tests were
scheduled from March 23 to 29.
Reference method value.
Monitor value.
Not available.
Test excluded from data base.

-------
 TABLE 3-56.   SUMMARY  OF  QA TEST  RESULTS  FOR  SYSTEM  RELATIVE  ACCURACY
Week
in
1980
1/20-1/26
1/27-2/2
1/27-2/2
2/3-2/9
2/10-2/16
2/17-2/23
2/24-3/1
2/24-3/1
3/2-3/8
3/2-3/8
3/9-3/15
3/9-3/15
3/16-3/29
3/30-4/5
Date
in
1980
Sampling
location
No. of
data3
Not testedd
2/1
Outlet
3
Inlet P/S tests performed
2/5-6
2/12-2/1
Outlet9
3 Outlet9
4
3h
Outlet P/S tests performed9'1
2/26
2/27
3/6
3/6


Inlet
Outlet
Inlet
Outlet
Inlet
Outlet
1J
3
3
2k
4
4
No tests performed
Inlet and outlet P/S
tests performed"1
Arithmetic nean,
Ib SOZ/106 Btu
RMb
e
0.53
e
0.51
0.28
e
4.54
0.67
5.22
0.85
4.74
0.55
e
e
Mc
e
0.46
e
0.50
0.35
e
5.33
0.54
5.46
0.70
4.83
0.54
e
e
Aritmethic mean, X
,M-RM inn\
( RM x 100)
3
-13.2
e
-2.0
+25.0
e
+ 17.4
-19.4
+4.6
-17.6
+1.9
-1.8
e
e
b Not including  tests excluded.
  Reference method value.
  Monitor value.
  No tests scheduled, only 1 of CEM operating.
* No QA test data available.
  See Table 3-17 for inlet P/S results.
? Inlet not tested, efforts concentration on outlet testing.
. Six tests completed, three tests discarded because of reference method probe failure.
1 See Table 3-18 for outlet P/S results.
J Three tests completed, two tests discarded because of ORSAT test  failure.
. Three tests completed, discarded due  to S02 analysis failure.
  The CEM data collection finished March 18; there was no return until March 31 for final  P/S testing.
" See Table 3-28 and 3-29 for final P/S results.
                                          3-74

-------
         TABLE 3-57.   QA MOISTURE DATA FOR USE WITH CEM RESULTS
                                  (% H20)
Date of test
in 1980
1/29
1/30
2/1
2/5
2/6
2/12
2/13
2/19
2/20
2/26
2/27
3/6
3/8
3/9
3/10
3/11
3/12
3/13
3/14
3/15
3/16
3/19
Inlet3
3.33
3.34
d
d
d
d
d
d
d
1.45
d
2.86
d
d
d
d
d
1.88
d
d
d
d
Outlet9
d
d
11.8
10.5
12-?Q
4-9P
3-°^
4-3!
4.2e
d o
4.3e
16.5
d
d
d
d
d
14.0
d
d
d
d
Maximum S02
14.6
14.6
14.6
14.6
14.6
14.6
14.6
14.6
14.6
14.6
14.6
14.6
10.2
11.3
10.2
9.7
10.2
9.7
9.2.
11.3
10.2
11.3
Maximum 02
2.76
2.76
2.76
2.76
2.76
2.76
2.76
2.76
2.76
2.76
2.76
2.76
2.76
2.76
2.76
2.76
2.76
2.76
2.76
2.76
2.76
2.76
Determined during Method 6 S02, tests except where noted.   When no tests
were performed, CEM data were determined from the last previous moisture
value or, if no previous value was available, from the next following
value.
Determined from moisture saturation at monitor mist knockout trap tempera-
ture and pressure (information from calibration sheets in Appendix B).
Determined from moisture saturation at room temperature (68°F) and 5 in. Hg
vacuum.
No test.
                                   3-75

-------
valid during  this  period,  as evidenced by a  lack  of condensate



accumulation  in  the mist knockout  traps.   The reason  for  this



occurrence was cold weather, which apparently cooled portions of



the outlet  sampling interface to a temperature below the stack



moisture dewpoint.






3.5  PARTICULATE AND NO  RESULTS
                       J*±


     The  particulate  concentration  at the  FGD  system  inlet



averaged  0.15 gr/dscf  with  an  average emission  rate of  0.33



lb/106 Btu.   At  the FGD  system  outlet the particulate concen-



tration averaged 0.12  gr/dscf with an  average  emission rate of



0.26  lb/106.   Based  on  these  rates,  the average   FGD  system



particulate  removal efficiency  was  21.2  percent.   Table  3-58



presents the particulate test results.



     The average NO  concentration at  the FGD  system inlet was
                    X


178 ppm with an average  emission rate of 0.65 lb/106  Btu.  At



the FGD system outlet the average emission rate of  0.63  lb/106



Btu.   Based  on  these  rates,  the  FGD system  reduced the NO
                                                               X


emissions  by  an  average  of  3.1  percent; however,  because of the



data  scatter, it  cannot be statistically  concluded  that the



outlet  result  differs  from  the  inlet  result.    Table  3-59



presents NO  test results.
                                3-76

-------
                               TABLE 3-58.  PARTICULATE TEST RESULTS
Test No.
RI5-1
RI5-2
RI5-3
Average
R05-1
R05-2
R05-3
Average
Date in
1980
3/12
3/12
3/13

3/12
3/12
3/13

Sampling location

Inlet



Outlet


Concentration,3
gr/dscf
0.14
0.16
0.14
0.15
0.09
0.13
0.12
0.12
Emission rate,
lb/106 Btu (
0.33
0.35
0.30
0.33
0.21
0.29
0.27
0.26
Grains per dry standard cubic foot at 68°F and 29.92 in.  Hg.

-------
                                   TABLE 3-59.  NITROGEN OXIDE TEST RESULTS
Test No.
NOI-l-A
NOI-l-B
NOI-l-C
NOI-l-D
Average
NOI-2-A
NOI-2-B
NOI-2-C
NOI-2-D
Average
NOI-3-A
NOI-3-B
NOI-3-C
NOI-3-D
Average
Date in
1980
3/10
3/10
3/10
3/10

3/10
3/10
3/10
3/10

3/11
3/11
3/11
3/11

INLET AVERAGE
NOO-l-A
NOO-l-B
NOO-l-C
NOO-l-D
Average
NOO-2-A
NOO-2-B
NOO-2-C
NOO-2-D
Average
3/10
3/10
3/10
3/10

3/10
3/10
3/10
3/10

Sampling location
Inlet

Inlet

Inlet


Outlet

Outlet

Concentration,
ppm
203
184
159
182
182
191
140
158a
342a
163
190
216
257
226
222
189
132
115
131
135
128
136
127
65
187
129
Emission rate,
lb/106 Btu
0.77
0.71
0.60
0.63
0.68 '
0.70
0.49
0.56
NA
0.58
0.60
0.68
0.82
0.67
0.69
0.65
0.64
0.54
0.63
0.63
0.61
0.64
0.59
0.30
0.84
0.59
CO

«vl
00

-------
CO
I
UD
         TABLE 3-59 (continued)
Test No.
NOO-3-A
NOO-3-B
NOO-3-C
NOO-3-D
Average
Date in
1980
3/11
3/11
3/11
3/11

OUTLET AVERAGE
Sampling location

Outlet



Concentration,
ppm
144
145
143
149
145
134
Emission rate,
lb/106 Btu
0.67
0.70
0.75
0.72
0.71
0.63

-------
                            SECTION 4



                       PROCESS DESCRIPTION





4.1  PHYSICAL PLANT



     Table 4-1 lists process information.



4.1.1  Boiler System



     The boiler  system consists of  six  industrial-size boilers



designed to supply high-temperature water for building and water



heating at the base.   The five older boilers are rated at 30 x



106 Btu/h, and the newer boiler is rated at 60 x 106 Btu/h.  The



boilers are  stoker  fired,  with coal  spread on  under-air-flow



perforated grates and  burned  at a typical ash bed depth of 3 to



5 inches.   Grates are mechanically rotated in all bxit the oldest



operating boiler to remove ash to the pneumatic disposal system.



Ash must  be  removed manually from the grate  of the oldest unit



in operation.



4.1.2  FGD System



     The FGD ststem consists  of a mechanical collector, Swedish



Bahco  scrubber  tower,  lime storage  and  handling system, clari-



fier  (thickener),  booster fan, sludge disposal pond,  and asso-



ciated duct work, pumps, and controls.



     Untreated  flue gas  from the  individual boilers  enters a



common header equipped with a bypass stack and is fed through a



mechanical  collector  where  primary  particulate removal  takes





                               4-1

-------
 TABLE 4-1.  PROCESS INFORMATION FOR RICKENBACKER AIR FORCE BASE
Installation name



Installation location

Fuel characteristics

Total rating

Number of separate FGD units

Number of boilers

Source capacity

Control system vendor

Control process

Type of FGD system

Startup date

Control system status

S02 removal efficiencies


Particulate removal efficiency

Water makeup

Sludge or byproduct disposal
Rickenbacker Air Force Base
(Rickenbacker Air National Guard
Base)

Columbus, Ohio

Coal (3.6% sulfur)

55,000 scfm

1

6

210 x 106 Btu/h

Research-Cottrell/Bahco

Limestone or lime scrubbing

Retrofit

March 1976

Operational

90%+ design with lime operation;
lower with limestone operation

98% design

Open loop

Unstabilized CaS03/S04 sludge to
lined pond
                                 4-2

-------
place.  The mechanical collector has a design removal efficiency



of 70 percent  and  was installed primarily to reduce wear on the



booster fan, which is located  immediately  downstream.   The fan



introduces  the partially cleaned  flue gas  into the  scrubbing



tower where S02 removal takes place.



     The scrubber is a vertical tower consisting of two inverted



venturi scrubbing  stages.  Untreated  gas  is introduced into the



first  stage,  where  it is diverted  downward to impinge  on the



liquid  slurry  surface of the mill.  The  gas  then  rises through



the  first  stage  venturi, where  it  intimately  mixes  with the



slurry droplets now entrained in it.  The partially scrubbed gas



is then diverted downward onto the liquid slurry surface in the



second stage pan,  and the process  is repeated.  The treated gas



is then  directed upward  into  a cyclonic mist  eliminator where



entrained slurry droplets are  removed,  and then emitted through



a stub stack to the atmosphere.



     The reagent for the scrubbing system is fine mesh limestone



or pebble lime slurry.   Normally limestone is used, but for the



purpose of  this test lime was  employed.   The reagent slurry is



introduced  through  the   scrubbing  system  in a  countercurrent



fashion.



     The spent scrubbing solution is discharged to the thickener



where waste solids settle out.  Thickener overflow is returned



to the mixing  tank.   Underflow from the thickener is discharged



to a 5-acre Hypalon-lined  disposal pond located approximately



400  feet  from  the  FGD system.   Figure 4-1  is  a  flow diagram of



the Research-Cottrell  (R-C)/Bahco scrubbing system.



                               4-3

-------
                                                                                                I  •.
       REAGENT
       SYSTEM
       MODULE
  REAGENT ^
  FEEDER
AND SLAKER
 LIME  OR
LIMESTONE
  TRUCK

    UNLOADING
    STATION
                      REAGENT
                      STORAGE
                                                  STACK
                     MAKEUP WATER	*|,	


                   MIST ELIMINATOR

                         2ND STAGE
                                          OVERFLOW
                                           TO LIME
                                          DISSOLVING
                                             TANK
                                                                          THICKENER
                                                                                            SLUDGE
                                                                                            TO POND
                                                                                   BYPASS
                                                                                   MAKEUP
                                                                                   STACK
                                                                                   MECHANICAL
                                                                                   COLLECTOR
                                                                               FLUE GAS
                                                                               FROM HEAT
                                                                                 PLANT
                                                            TO FLY ASH
                                                             DISPOSAL
   LIME
   2ND
STAGE  PUMP
                                                  MILL
                                                  PUMP
DISSOLVING
   TANK
                  Figure  4-1.   R-C/Bahco scrubbing  system flow diagram.

-------
4.2  BACKGROUND INFORMATION



4.2.1  Boiler System



     Seven stoker-fired  boilers,  each rated  at  31 x  106  Btu/h



capacity were  originally installed between  1954 and  1956.   In



June  1977,  a new  stoker-fired boiler rated  at  60 x  106  Btu/h



came into service  to  replace  two of the older units,  which have



now been demolished.



4.2.2  FGD System



     The FGD system was retrofitted to the boiler system and was



placed in  service  in March 1976.   It was manufactured by A.B.



Banco  Ventilation  of  Enkoping,   Sweden,   and  installed  by



Research-Cottrell.    Following initial testing  using  lime  as  a



scrubbing  reagent,  it  has   operated  mainly  on cheaper,  less



reactive  limestone,  because  such operation  was  sufficient  to



meet  local  requirements  for  SO2  removal.   From January  19  to



April  10,  1980, the  system  was operated with  lime  reagent,  to



test the system at 90%+ removal efficiency.






4.3  PROCESS CONTROL DURING TEST



4.3.1  Boiler System



     During the  test the boiler system was  operated  in normal



fashion.   Average  total  boiler load  during data collection days



was  109  x 106 Btu/h,  which is  52 percent of the  total system



capacity.  Generally,  three to  five  boilers  were sufficient to



meet  heat demand  during  the period,  with  the   remainder  on



standby status.
                               4-5

-------
     Coal  for firing  was  loaded  through underground  transfer
chutes from the  reserve  coal pile  or coal delivery trucks.  The
coal was transferred to silos, with a 3- to 5-day residence time
before loading  to  the  gravity hoppers  at the  boiler  stokers.
Coal from the Broken Aro Mine in Ohio (Peabody Coal Company) was
supplied from reserves  until February  7;  truck  deliveries from
Broken Aro  then  resumed and  continued  until  February 28.   From
February 7  to 28,  truck deliveries were  directly  loaded to the
transfer silos.  From February  29  onward, coal from the Horizon
Mine in Ohio  (Yancy Minerals) was  delivered and directly loaded
to  the  transfer  silos.   Some Broken Aro  Coal was brought from
the reserve coal pile during early March, but the total quanti-
ty,  equaling  about  a  1/2-day  delivery,  was  insignificant.
Proximate assays  of coal delivered  during the  test  period are
listed  in  Table  4-2.    The  assay  sheets are  included  in the
appendix in this volume.
4.3.2  FGD System
     In addition to S02  emissions,  parameters that are monitored
during normal operation include pressure drop,  total gas  flow,
gas temperature,  pH, lime feed, water level,  and slurry density.
The  frequency and  function of monitoring these parameters are
described in detail.
     Pressure  drop  is   tested  across  the  two  stages  of the
scrubber.  This  serves  as  a  diagnostic  check; an  increase in
pressure drop indicates  scaling or plugging.   The pressure drop
can be adjusted  by changing the weir gate heights in the  first-
                               4-6

-------
                  TABLE 4-2.   ASSAYS  OF COAL DELIVERED AND BURNED FROM JANUARY 16 TO  MARCH 19
Date delivered
in 1980
1/16-1/17
1/17-1/29
2/7-2/15
2/15-2/28
2/29-3/6
3/6-3/14
Sulfur con-
tent (dry),3 %
2.9
3.0
3.9
3.7
2.3
3.1
Heating value (dry),3
Btu/lb
13,080
13,140
13,540
13,470
12,900
13,260
S02 emission rate,
lb/106 Btu
4.21
4.34
5.47
5.22
3.39
4.44
Mine
Horizon
Horizon
Date burned
in 1980
Stockpiled
Stockpiled
I ^
Broken Aroe 2/ll-2/19f
Broken Aro 2/19-3/3
Horizon
Horizon
3/3-3/109
3/10-3/19
*   3  See Assay Sheets in appendix.
-J     Determined by the following equation:
S02 emission rate = 2 x
x
                                                           x (0.95)
              where      2 = conversion of Ib S to Ib S02
                      0.95 = proportion factor for S02 conversion

         106  heating value = conversion of Btu/lb to lb/106  Btu.

    .  Horizon coal  supplied by Yancy Minerals.
      Coal  delivered and stockpiled; Broken Aro coal from  yard burned;  no  assay  of coal  burned these
      dates is available.
    -  Broken  Aro coal  supplied by Peabody Coal  Co.
      Four-day lag  (average lag of 3 to 5 days) assumed.
    '  Some  Broken Aro coal from yard burned.

-------
and second-stage level  tanks.   During the test period,  however,
no changes in pressure drop were made.
     Total  gas  _flow  is measured at  the  scrubber inlet  and is
normally  recorded  continuously.   During  the  test period,  the
transmitter supplying this  data was  malfunctioning.   Consistent
gas flow  rates  were  maintained by monitoring the amperage drawn
by the forced draft fan at the scrubber inlet.
     Temperature levels are monitored at  the scrubber inlet and
the  scrubber  bypass  stack.    High   temperatures  indicate  the
passage of  boiler  flue gas at  either point.   Alarms, which are
set to activate when inlet temperatures fall below 300°F or when
bypass temperatures  exceed 300°F,  indicate probable boiler or
scrubber shutdown.
     The  pH  levels   are  monitored  continuously  at  the  first
scrubber  stage  and at  the  dissolver  tank.   The metering system
does not  operate any control  loops,  but  activates alarms when
the pH at either point drops below 4.  This alarm indicates that
a malfunction  of the lime  feed mechanism has  probably  occurred
and that  remedial  action is required.  In conjunction  with CEM
outputs,  pH levels are  used to adjust the lime feed for desired
S02 removal efficiency.
     Pebble lime feed is regularly  checked and recorded during
each shift.  More frequent checks are indicated by changes in pH
or  S02  emission  levels.    The  feed  system is designed  to be
controlled through an automatic control  loop  by the  outlet SC>2
analyzer.   When S(>2 concentration exceeds 200 ppm, the system is
                               4-8

-------
designed to  increase  the lime  feed.   This control loop  is  not
normally used  because of operational difficulties  and  was  dis-
connected during the test.
     System water levels are automatically readjusted  when water
level drops  in the lime dissolver tank.  Makeup water  is added
by  spray  nozzles  above  the second  stage of  the   scrubber  and
serves the  secondary  purpose of removing slurry buildup  on  the
inside walls of the scrubber.
     Slurry density is monitored continuously  at the  mill below
the first stage of the scrubber.  When slurry density  exceeds 50
percent,  waste sludge is automatically pumped to the pond.
     During the test  period, the  lime feed rate from  storage to
the slaker  was the only  significant control needed  to achieve
desired S02  removal efficiency.  Plant operators  on  all  shifts
made periodic checks of the FGD performance,  as evidenced by the
CEM output, and  adjusted  the lime  feed rate as needed.   Because
the  CEM  used  a  measuring  range ratio  of  10:1  for  inlet  and
outlet S02  readings and  recorded  them on the same chart,  it was
easy  for  plant operators to note when  adjustments were needed.
The  only  significant periods  recorded  during which  the  FGD
system did  not operate at  approximately  90% or better S02  re-
moval efficiency  occurred when the  lime  feed  rate control  was
lost because of mechanical breakdown of the lime slaker .<
                               4-9

-------
                            SECTION 5



        CONTINUOUS EMISSION MONITORING SYSTEM DESCRIPTION





     The CEM  consisted of an SO2  monitoring system permanently



installed at  the  plant with  an  O2 monitor temporarily installed



for  the  purpose  of  the test.  Additional  changes made  to  the



existing  system  included  repositioning  the  inlet and  outlet



probes to ensure sampling from centroid cross sectional areas of



the  ducts,  installation of recorders with  greater data resolu-



tion than existing equipment, and installation of a calibration



gas  delivery  system.   Figure  5-1  shows  sampling  locations  in



regards to FGD process, and Figure 5-2 is a simplified schenuitic



of the CEM.   This section describes the CEM components.





5.1  SAMPLING INTERFACE



     The  monitoring  system  utilized  a  DuPont 460  instrument



system  to  provide   the extractive  sample  from  both  sampling



locations.  Sample gas was pulled through a stainless steel mesh



filter screen inside the duct  through a heated  probe equipped



with a  blowback system, and  into a heated teflon sample line.



The samples were then drawn to the monitor, which was located in



the  FGD  system control room at ground  level.   The differentia-



tion between  sampling the two different  sample gas streams was



controlled  automatically on  a  10-minute  cycle  by  the DuPont
                               5-1

-------
                STACK
MIST ELIMINATOR
                          OUTLET  PROBE
                                                   BYPASS
                                                   MAKEUP
                                                    STACK
                                                   MECHANICAL
                                                   COLLECTOR
                                                                FLUE GAS
                                                                FROM HEAT
                                                                 PLANT
                                                ANALYZERS

                                                   CALIBRATION TANKS
           Figure  5-1.   Sampling  locations after modifications.
                                     5-2

-------
                                                         ANALYSIS SYTEM OF CEM
SHIELDED
316 SS
MESH FILTER
                   HEAT
                  TRACING
                  MANUAL
                 THREE-WAY
                   VALVE
(IN  STACK)
AUTOMATIC
THREE-WAY
  VALVE
    TWO-WAY  SOLENOID
        TEFLON
        TUBING
       4.  TO
      CALIBRATION
          GAS
 HEATED
 SAMPLE
 LINE TO
ANALYZER
                  HIGH-PRESSURE
                   AIR SUPPLY
           PROBE ASSEMBLY
                    H-Cfc - -L
                    I- -0*3 - C
-•C*] 	 '
RAT
GAS CYLINDER
CONTROL
VALVES
ION SELECTION
                    FLOW CONTROL VALVE
                    TO MONITOR CALIBRATION
TO OUTLET
PROBE HEATED OUTLET SAMPLE! _
TO Il>
PRO
ASSE^
ASSEMBLY
!H.ET, HEATED INLET SAMPLE
1RLY

HEATED CABINET

PHOTO -»
DEJECTOR ^, •

02
MONITOf
OUTLE
INLET

502 •*""
SAMPLE
CELL
I
T(
1
VACUUM—
GUAGEp)
rn
VACUUM] 	 1
REGULATOR
i HI
PRESSl
1
Ji
r
1
jj
1
^— My ii
/
	
pj_
GH-
JRE AIRL,!
1
— I
1 "— [
~T 1
U SAMPLE
A FLOW
A1 CONTROL i
T VALVES
_'T-_'TJ
_,' Fl Ft,
- j U ;
»_. % %

II T \\S^
UV
LIGHT
SOURCE
SAMPLE
SELECT
VALVES
MOISTURE
TRAPS
t I— X 	 »EXHAIW
MON?TOR |
CONTROL
UNIT
^AiTlNG01" ASPIRATOR(S)
\ND SIGNAL
T
S02 MONITOR
CONTROL UNIT

SINGLE-
POINT
RECORDER



DUAL-
POINT
RECORDER
                 Figure 5-2.   Simplified schematic  of CEM.
                                           5-3

-------
unit.  A sidestream sample for the oxygen monitor was taken from



the  unit  in a  flow  fashion parallel to  the  SO2  analysis cell.



The  sample  dewpoint  was  controlled by temperature-constant mist



knockout traps  upstream  from  S02  and O2 analysis.  The dewpoint



of SO2 samples were held at a maximum of approximately 120°F and



5 in. Hg vacuum;  O2  sample dewpoints were held at  a maximum of



68°F and 5 in. Hg vacuum.





5.2  S02 MONITOR



     The SO2  monitor was a DuPont  460  analyzer,  which measures



S02  by  ultraviolet spectrophotometry.  This  is  accomplished by



drawing a sample into a windowed cell, passing ultraviolet light



through the sample,   and measuring  the photometric  output  ob-



tained  in  a wavelength  specific  to SO2  absorption.   Inlet  and



outlet  samples  are differentiated  by electronic  track and hold



circuits that are actuated by the timing mechanism that controls



the  sample  flow.   An automatic  zeroing system operates  on  the



sample  cycle,  correcting  for fluctuations and  drift  every 10



minutes.





5.3  O2 MONITOR



     The O2  monitor  was  a Thermox  WDG  III  analyzer, which mea-



sures  O2  by  electrochemical  means  across  a heated zirconium



oxide cell.   Sample  gas flow was  provided  by  the  DuPont  460



unit.   The  inlet  and outlet  sample streams  were differentiated



by the  occurrence of a  purge function in  the 10-minute cycle,



which showed as an off-scale spike on the recorder chart.
                               5-4

-------
5.4  RECORDERS



     Leeds and Northrup Speedomax recorders were used to collect



the data for the- S02 and O2 monitors.  A dual-point recorder was



used for the SO2 data; a single-point recorder, for the O2 data.



The recorders  were located in the FGD  system  control  room with



the analyzers.   Time-marked charts  were used to  simplify data



reduction.





5.5  CALIBRATION SYSTEM



     A calibration system was used that included certified cali-



bration gas cylinders  and  a valving system to facilitate intro-



duction of gases  to the CEM sampling interface.  Zero, midscale



(50% scale),  and span  (90% scale) gas  concentrations  were pro-



vided for  the ranges  used  in  analysis (0 to  500  ppm  SO2,  0 to



5000 ppm SO2,  and 0 to 25% O2).
                               5-5

-------
                            SECTION 6

                   PROCEDURES AND CALCULATIONS


6.1  CONTINUOUS SO2 DATA COMPUTATIONS

     Sulfur  dioxide  data  computation  was  performed  with  a

Hewlett-Packard 3000 computer system.  Raw data were loaded into

the program, and complete listing of emission rates and scrubber

efficiencies were printed out for the entire test period.

6.1.1 Activities Before Computer Run


Keypunch Card Preparation—

     Raw data were  reduced and transcribed onto load sheets for

keypunching onto computer cards.  Additional cards were prepared

to identify the data listings by location  and  date  and to pro-

vide comments explaining cause and duration of data loss.

     Comment cards  were  prepared by reference to CEM operator's

logs  and strip  charts.   Raw  data  load  sheets,  containing 15-

minute  listings of  S02  and  O2  data  and moisture,  calibration

data,  and  boiler  information  were prepared in  the  following

manner:

     1.   The S02  and  O2  data were determined by processing raw
          strip  charts  through  the  use  of  a  data digitizing
          device, which  converted recorder deflections to digi-
          tal  values.    The  operation  was manually performed,
          with  readings  for inlet  and outlet SO2  and O2 being
          obtained and transcribed on a 15-minute basis.
                               6-1

-------
     2.   Moisture  determinations   for  each  parameter   were
          entered on  the basis  of availability  of test  data.
          Separate  determinations  were  entered  for  inlet  and
          outlet SO2 and O2.   Separate  determinations  were also
          made for  SO2  and O2 analysis, because  the O2  monitor
          operated  with an  ambient  temperature  sample  line,
          which tended to remove some moisture.

     3.   Changes in monitor calibration caused by 24-hour drift
          were compensated for by entering span gas readings for
          each parameter on a 6-hour basis.   These readings were
          interpolated from calibration information.

     4.   Boiler  heat  rates  were  taken from  plant  operating
          records,  which contained  summarized heat production
          rates in terms of 106 Btu/h.  These were calculated by
          plant personnel  as  a determination  from total boiler
          pressure  and  temperature  differentials.  The  values
          were transcribed  onto the  load sheets  on an  hourly
          basis.
Other Computer Entries—

     Calibration entries and boiler heat units were entered into

the  program  before data  runs  to differentiate  the  computation

from  runs  of  other  data using  different values.   Calibration

entries needed were assays  of  the span gases used to obtain the

readings keypunched with the data.  The boiler  heat unit entry

signalled the proper heading for the listing of heat rates to be

106 Btu/h.

6.1.2  Computation and Listing of Data

     Data computation  was performed once the  cards  were loaded

into the program, and listings were produced.  Separate listings

were produced  for  15-minute SO2  and O2 readings; 1-hour average

inlet  emission  rate  (Ein), outlet emission  rate  (Eout),  and

removal efficiency (Eff);  and  24-hour  average  Ein,  Eout,  and

Eff.   Listings  also   included  total  averages  for   1-hour  and

24-hour Ein,  Eout,  and Eff.

                               6-2

-------
15 Minute Listings—

     Complete 15-minute listings were prepared from the informa-

tion loaded on the  cards.   These listings presented the follow-

ing information:

     1.   Heading, identifying the source  and date on each page
          of listings.

     2.   Raw CEM data, corrected  for calibration,  but on a wet
          basis,  presented on a 15-minute basis.

     3.   Moisture  data  for  each gas  stream  in percent  H2O,
          presented on a 15-minute basis.

     4.   Corrected CEM data,  calculated by multiplying raw data
          by the  quantity  100/(100-M),  where  M equals the mois-
          ture percent.

     5.   Average Ein,  Eout,  and  Eff,  calculated on  an hourly
          basis  from  average corrected S02  and  O2 data.   The
          following equaitons were used:


          Ib S02/106 Btu = (ppm S02 dj.  )(9820) (1.64 x 10~7 ) x
                       (20.95)	
                     (20.95 - % 02dry   )               (Eg  6_1}

          where     9820 = bituminous coal factor for dscf/106
                           Btu,  utilizing excess air factor

             1.64 x 10~7 = conversion of ppm S02 to Ib S02/dscf
             20.95
          (20.95 - % 02dry)
                            = excess air factor
          Eff =     -Eout  x 100                      (Eg. 6-2)
                   EI in


          Two data points per hour were needed for a calculation
          to be  performed.   Equation 6-1 was  used to calculate
          Ein and  Eout,  and Equation 6-2 was  used to calculate
          Eff.

     6.   Boiler information, printed in  106  Btu/h on an hourly
          average basis.
                               6-3

-------
     7.   Comments, printed as entered in  the  appropriate loca-
          tions to identify data loss periods.

     8.   Data loss periods,  signified by repetition of previous
          listed., number,  or with  the  printing of  ###  symbols.


1-Hour and 24-Hour Listings and Averages—

     Hourly averages of Ein,  Eout,  and Eff and  boiler heat rates

were obtained  from  calculations  performed  during computation of

15-minute  listings.   These  were  compiled to  form hourly  and

daily listings of data  on a 1-hour and 24-hour averaging basis.

Each listing  was summarized in  a  brief  statistical format that

listed the data quantity base,  minimum and maximum values, mean,

and standard  deviation  for  each  parameter.  Total test averages

were grouped into time periods determined by a  30 day limitation

on  data  averaging.  The  individual  listing and  averaging pro-

cedures are described below:

     1.   Hourly  listings were compiled  for each 24-hour calen-
          dar day with  statistical determinations performed for
          each parameter that had an occurrence of 75 percent or
          greater  (eighteen  1-hour  averages per  24-hour day).
          For  each  parameter  that met the  75  percent  data cap-
          ture  condition,  the  hourly and daily  averages  were
          stored  for future computation.

     2.   The  total  hourly  averages from  periods of 75 percent
          data per  day  were run through statistical determina-
          tions  for each  parameter.  These  computations  were
          performed  for  the  groupings determined by the 30-day
          data  computation  limitation.    For  determination  of
          30-day data,  data days were included  that listed 18 or
          more hours of  data  capture for any parameter (exclud-
          ing heat rates), even if FGD efficiency was not deter-
          mined during a particular day.

     3.   The  24-hour listings  and  averages were performed for
          the  30-day data groupings described  above.   All data
          representing 18 or more  hours  of data capture per day
          of Ein, Eout,  or  Eff  were  listed.  Statistical deter-
          minations were performed on  the  30-day data groupings
          independently  and presented  following  each  listing.

                               6-4

-------
6.2  PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATION TESTING



     The P/S test procedures and calculations were in accordeince



with guidelines specified by  Performance  Specifications  2 and 3



in  the  Federal Register,  Vol. 44, No.  197, October  10,  1979.



Manual Methods  3  and 6 were performed to  complete  system rela-



tive  accuracy  tests.   In  addition to  the  procedures  outlined



below pertaining  to the performance  of these tests,  procedures



were needed to  ascertain CEM  outputs  correctly.  The procedures



and  calculations  employed  for determining  CEM outputs  in  the



field are outlined in Section 6.5.



6.2.1  Calibration Gas Certification



     All  S02  and  02  calibration gases were traceable  to  NBS



standards.   The procedures  for  establishing  traceability  are



outlined below.





Sulfur Dioxide Calibration Gas Certification—



     The  S02  calibration  gases were  supplied with certificates



of  analysis  from  the  vendors  establishing that  the  gases were



analyzed by an acceptable instrument technique using calibration



with NBS standards.





Oxygen Calibration Gas Certification—



     The O2 midrange  (12%)  was analyzed by ORSAT (EPA Method 3)



and  found to have  a value  within 5 percent  of the vendor's tag



value.  The tag value was thus certified as acceptable.  Ambient



air  was used as an O2 span value calibration gas and needed no



certification  testing  to  establish  its   oxygen  concentration.





                               6-5

-------
6.2.2  Conditioning Period



     The conditioning  period was  noted as  beginning once  the



complete CEM,  as  described in  Section  5,  was determined  to be



fully  operational.   After 168  hours  of  continuous  operation



without  modification  or  maintenance  except  as  specified  as



routine and/or necessary by  the CEM analyzer manufacturers,  the



period was deemed successfully completed.



6.2.3  Operational Test Period



     Because of the extensive nature of the P/S testing (involv-



ing  two  complete sets  of  tests) and the  short period of data



acquistion (spanning less  than  2 months),  no distinct period of



168 hours was  set aside,  and the entire period of data acquisi-



tion was  involved in operation testing.  The  QA  testing was in



providing continuity between initial and final P/S testing.  The



P/S  tests  procedures followed  during this period  are outlined



below.





Calibration Error--



     Both operational  ranges of the  SO2 monitor  and the  single



operational range of the 02  monitor were involved in this  test.



Calibration  values  of  midrange  and span  gases  were used as



determined in  Section  6.2.2.   The  individual checks  were per-



formed by running zero, midrange, and span gases in random order



through the  monitors  until five complete  sets (15 data points)



for  each  operating range were  obtained.   Figure  6-1 presents a



sample data  sheet and the equations  used  to determine calibra-



tion error.





                               6-6

-------
Run
no.

1
I
3
4
S
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
IS
Calibration {as
concentration,
• ppm
A















Measurtmnt ijrsten
rtadlng,
ppm
B















Arithmetic Hean •
Confidence Interv»l •
Calibration trror •
Arithmetic
differences,
P(m
A-B
Mid


















High


















               Arithmetic Mean (AM)  = g-
               95% Confidence
                Interval (CIg5)
               Calibration Error
                                     |AM|
                                         RV
               where
                             "•0.975
 x =  arithmetic difference, ppm
 n =  number of data points
RV =  calibration gas concentration, ppm
     t  value as shown below
na
2
3
4
5
6
'0.975
12.706
4.303
3.182
2.776
2.571
na
7
8
9
10
11
'0.975
2.447
2.365
2.306
2.262
2.228
na
12
13
14
15
16
^.975
2.201
2.179
2.160
2.145
2.131
                 Values  are already corrected for n-1
                 degrees of freedom; use n equal to
                 the number of individual values.
Figure 6-1.   Sample  data  sheet  and  equations  for the determination of
                              calibration error.
                                       6-7

-------
System Response Time—



     Both SO2 operating ranges and the single O2  operating range



were  checked  for  response  time.   The  procedure entailed  the



alternating introduction of  zero  and  span gases  into the system



and  the  recording  of elapsed time  between introduction  and  a



stable reading.  During the  tests,  gases were introduced to the



sampling interface  at  the  probe  mountings,  so that the response



time  included  any  lag caused by  the sample line length.   Gas



flow  rates  during  these tests  were  consistent  with  normal



sampling procedures.   Three   sets  of zero-to-span and span-to-



zero  checks  were performed  for  each parameter.    Response from



either span  or zero  calibration gas to  flue  gas was  not used



because  of minute-to-minute   variability  of flue  gas  readings,



leading  to  inconsistent  results.  Figure 6-2 presents a sample



data  sheet  and the equations used to determine  system response



time.





2-Hour Zero and Calibration Drift—



     Both SO2 operating ranges and the single O2  operating range



were  tested  to  determine 2-hour  drift.   The  strategy was  to



introduce  consecutively  zero and  span  gas  at 2-hour  intervals



until  15 sets of  data were obtained.    Figure  6-3 presents  a



sample data sheet and the equations used.





24-Hour Zero and Calibration Drift—



     Both SO2 operating ranges and the single O2  operating range



were  tested  to determine  24-hour drift.   Initial readings were
                               6-8

-------
      Date
         High-level
ppm

Test Run
1
2
3
Average
Upscale,
m1n



A •
Downscale,
m1n



B •
System Response Time (slower of A and B). • m1n.
 Average
 (Slower of A and B) x 10° - 15%; otherwise retestlng is required.
 where
x = individual response, minutes
n = number of test runs (3)
Figure 6-2.  Sample data sheet and equations for determination of
                      system response time.
                               6-9

-------
Mtl
let
*>.
1
Z
3
4
S
6
7
e
9
10
11
12
13
14
IS
fcte















Time
Begin















End















Zero
In1t.
A















Ug
Fin.
B















Arithmetic *>"
Confidence Inttnril
Zero Drift
Zero
drift
C-B-A


















Ml -level
«dq
n(t.
D















Fin.
E















Spin
drift
F-t-t















bllbntton
Ctllb.
drift
6-F-C


















                                                         drift
                      Arithmetic Mean (AM)  •= ^-
                      95% Confidence
                       Interval  (C195)
                      Zero or Calibration
                       Drift (S02 monitor)

                      Zero or Calibration
                       Drift (02 monitor)
                                           *-Q.97S
          x2)
                                           |AM| + CI
                                                   95
    RV
           x 100
                      wnere
                                       x
                                       n
                                  Zero RV
                            Calibration RV
                                   ••0.975
                                     0.25
 (|AM| + CI95) x 0.25

individual  drift, %
number of data points (IS)
total scale. % (100)
calibration gas assay multi-
plied by 100 and divided by
the  range,  ppm
t value as  shown below

conversion  of * scale to t  0,
n4
2
3
4
5
6
t0975
12.706
4.303
3.182
2.776
2.571
nd
7
8
9
10
11
t0.975
2.447
2.365
2.306
2.262
2.228
nd
12
13
14
15
16
t0.975
2.201
2.179
2.160
2.145
2.131
                      * Values are already corrected for n-1
                       degrees of freedom; use  n equal to
                       the number of Individual values.
Figure 6-3.   Sample  data  sheet  and equations  for determination of
                    2-hour  zero and  calibration drift.
                                         6-10

-------
obtained for each 24-hour  period  by calibrating each instrument

and  recording  the  zero and  span  readings after  calibration.

Final  readings  were  obtained by recording the  precalibration

zero and span readings  on  the following day.   A complete set of

data for 24-hour drift determination consisted of seven consecu-

tive 24-hour drift determinations.  Figure 6-4 presents a sample

data sheet and the equations used.


System Relative Accuracy—

     System relative  accuracy tests consisted  of comparing CEM

and  reference  method determined  emission  rates  in Ib  SO2/106

Btu.   The  CEM determinations were  obtained by  utilizing inte-

grated  averages  of monitor  output.   Reference method  deter-

minations were  obtained using Methods  6  and 3  for  SO2  and O2.

Moisture determinations  were  performed with  Reference Method 6

to  enable  comparison of CEM  and  reference method  results  on a

dry  basis.   Guidelines  provided  by  Performance Specification 2

in  the Federal Register,  Vol.  44,  No.  197,  October  10,  1979,

were followed.

     1.   Reference Method  6  samples were collected in an inte-
          grated  sampling  train  from  a  probe  situated  in the
          same cross-sectional  centroidal area  (<5%  stack  dia-
          meter)  as  the CEM probe tip.   Reference  Method 3 bag
          samples were  collected  from the  same sampling point.

     2.   Nine conccurrent  Reference Method 3  and  6 tests  were
          performed  to  complete  each  set  of  system relative
          accuracy  data.   At  any given sampling site (inlet or
          outlet of  FGD  system),  no more than one test per hour
          was allowed.   The  tests  were performed when  the CEM
          was in the normal data collecting mode, without inter-
          ference from 2-hour drift, calibration error, response
                               6-11

-------
Oati
set
no.
1
2
3
4
S
6
7
Date







T1m
teg In

"





1
End







Zen
InH.
A







Rdq
Mn.
B







Arithmetic Mean
Confidence Interval
Zero drift
Zero
drift
C-B-A










Hi-level
Rdg
Inlt.
D







Fin.
E







Span
drift
F-E-0







Calibration
i»r1ft
Callb.
drift
G«F-<










                  Arithmetic Mean  (AM)  =
                  95£ Confidence
                   Interval (CI
                              g5
                 Zero or Calibration
                  Drift (S02 monitor)

                 Zero or Calibration
                   Drift (02 monitor)
                                        |AM| + CI
                                                g5
   RV
          x 100
(|AM| + CIg5) x 0.25
                 where              x =  individual  drift, %
                                    n =  number of data points (7)
                              Zero RV =  total scale,  % (100)
                        Calibration RV =  calibration gas assay multi-
                                        plied by 100  and divided by
                                        the range,  ppm
                               *0 975 =  * va^ue as  shown below
                                 0.25 «  conversion  of % scale to % Oo
n*
2
3
4
5
6
^.975
12.706
4.303
3.182
2.776
2.571
na
7
8
9
10
11
V975
2.447
2.365
2.306
2.262
2.228
n4
12
13
14
15
16
^.975
2.201
2.179
2.160
2.145
2.131
                   Values are already corrected for n-1
                   degrees of freedom; use n equal to
                   the number of Individual values.
Figure 6-4.   Sample data sheet and equations for determination  of
                  24-hour  zero  and calibration drift.
                                     6-12

-------
          time,   or  24-hour  calibration  tests.   Samples  were
          synchronized with  CEM  10-minute sampling  cycles  to
          allow three  separate  CEM measurements to be  averaged
          for each test.

     3.    The  CEM  data  were  determined  from  recorded  strip
          charts in  terms  of SO2  and O2 concentration  on a wet
          basis.  Three readings of each were  averaged  for each
          test.    Reference  Method 6  moisture data  were  used
          (after correction for CEM dewpoint)  to convert CEM SO2
          and O2  readings  to  a dry  basis.   Emission  rates  in
          terms of Ib  S02/106 Btu  were then  determined  by Equa-
          tion  6-1.    The  CEM  and  reference  method  data  and
          calculated emission rates were recorded,  and  correla-
          tions  were  determined   on   data  sheets.  Figure  6-5
          presents a sample data sheet and  the equations used to
          determine system  relative accuracy.


6.3  DETERMINATION OF  FACTORS ACCOUNTING  FOR DATA CAPTURE AND
     LOSS PERIODS

6.3.1  FGD Determinations

     Operability,  reliability,   availability,   and  utilization

represent different  facets of FGD  system  operations,  including

excursions,  in  terms of percentages.  The calculations used to

determine them are presented below:

     1    Ooerabilitv =  hours FGD operated        Q
     i.    operaDiiity   hourg boiler operated  x 10U


     2.    Reliability =    hours FGD operated	
                    J   hours called on to  operate

     3.    Availability =  hours FGD capable of operation
                                 hours in  period

     4.    utUization =


     For  data  capture, only normal  operations were considered,

and FGD  excursions were  excluded.   Operability as determined by

this limitation is calculated as follows:

     Normal Operability = Operability - [  12l~«-i-£SSi««l x 10Q]
                               6-13

-------
Run
no.
-1
2
3
4
S
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Date and
time












Average
SO,
RK
M inm
ppm


























Confidence Interval
Accuracy















°? '
RM I M
%

























so?
RM
M hiff
wss/OCV









































r~
            RM - reference method result; M - monitoring system result;  and
            mass/GVC -  mass per gross caloric value, lb/10» Btu.
           Average (A)
rx
n
            95% Confidence
             Interval  (CI
                        g5
              - (ix)
           Accuracy
                                       CI
                                         95
                                    RV
           x 100
           where
                              x
                              n
                             RV

                          10.975
individual result
number of data points
average of reference method results
t value as shown below
na
2
3
4
5
6
to. 975
12.706
4.303
3.182
2.776
2.571
na
7
8
9
10
11
t0.975
2.447
2.365
2.306
2.262
2.228
na
12
13
14
15
16
t0.975
2.201
2.179
2.160
2.145
2.131
             Values are already corrected for n-1
             degrees of freedom; use n equal to
             the number of Individual values.
Figure 6-5.  Sample data  sheet and  equations  for  determination  of
                        system relative accuracy.
                                     6-14

-------
6.3.2  CEM Operability Determinations

     Inlet  operability  represents  the  capability of  the  CEM

inlet  sampling  system to  gather data.   The determination  in-

cludes data  capture  during periods of excursions  and is  calcu-

lated as follows:
     CEM inlet operability .  <'   .£££**>  x 100
     Outlet  operability represents  the capability  of the  CEM

outlet sampling  system to gather data.  The  determination does

not consider  FGD operation during excursions  and  is calculated

as follows:
     „.,..,    .,  .         _ (hours of outlet data) __   „ , An
      oper^biUty   =   (FGD  hours  - hours of  excursions   x 10°

6.4  QUALITY ASSURANCE

     The QA procedures were designed to provide the most consis-

tency with P/S  procedures  that was practicable.    The 24-hour

drift  determinations   and  system relative  accuracy  tests were

performed  in  the same  manner as in P/S testing, but the report-

ing  of QA system  relative  accuracy  differed  because of  the

abbreviated nature of the weekly data (only three tests per week

for  QA  compared  with  nine  for P/S).  Moisture determinations

were  performed in  the same manner  as  during  P/S  testing and,

because of the  wet gas CEM  analysis system,  provided a  vital

data  parameter  for  final  data  listings.   The  QA  tests  are

described below.
                               6-15

-------
6.4.1  24-Hour Drift Tests



     The 24-hour drift tests were  performed in exactly the same



manner as P/S tests; the results were based on daily calibration



information  collected  from January  25  through March  18.   Sub-



section  6.2.3  explains  the procedures  and calculations  used.



Weekly results are listed.



6.4.2  System Relative Accuracy Tests



     The  system  relative  accuracy  tests  were  performed on  a



weekly basis by  virtually the same  test procedures  outlined in



Subsection 6.2.3.   The  only difference was in  the  reporting of



data  results.   Because  a  relatively  small  (three-point)  data



base was  provided for each  test,  averages of  results were  re-



ported on  a  weekly basis,  with no  utilization  of  a 95 percent



confidence interval.



6.4.3  Moisture Determinations



     Manual Method  6 test moisture data gathered during P/S and



QA  testing  provided  the  base  for  moisture  determinations.



Providing  accurate  values  for  use  in  correcting CEM  data  re-



quired  assaying  the mositure  at  the  point of  analysis;  thus,



removal of moisture between extraction from  stack  and analysis



had to  be accounted for.   This was done  according  to the fol-



lowing equations:





          percent moisture = lowest of A or B           (Eg.  6-3)



where     A = stack moisture, percent



          B = dewpoint moisture, percent
                               6-16

-------
percent dewpoint  moisture  =   partial pressure of H?O a+t   1QO
e                                   pressure of system
                                                        (Eq.  6-4)

where  t = lowest temperature of interface
           before analysis point

       pressure of
        system      = 25 in. Hg

Equations 6-3 and  6-4  had  to be applied to each monitor as well

as  to  each  gas  stream, because  the monitor  configuration  re-

sulted in different  lowest-point  temperatures  in  the 02 and S02

sampling interfaces.   In all cases the  lowest calculated mois-

ture value   was  reported.    The   lowest  temperature  of the  O2

monitor interface  was  room  temperature  (68°F) because  unheated

lines were used  to transfer sample gas to the 02  monitor.   The

lowest temperature of  the  SO2  monitor interface was measured on

a  daily basis  at  the mist knockout traps  provided  with  the

DuPont 460 system and generally exceeded 100°F.  System pressure

was assumed  to be  25 in. Hg for determining partial pressure of

moisture,  based on  5 in.  Hg vacuum and 30 in.  Hg  average atmos-

pheric pressure.

     Special  moisture  determinations were performed downstream

from the outdoors sample lines during a period when cold temper-

atures apparently  cooled sample  lines  to below the  DuPont 460

knockout  trap temperature  dewpoint,   as evidenced  by  no  con-

densate  collection.    These  tests were  performed by diverting

sample gas  from  the analyzer  and passing a measured volume of

the gas  through  preweighed  silica gel.   Care was  taken during

these tests  to approximate  closely  normal sampling  flow rates

and cycles  to minimize variations that might cause different

condensation rates in the sample lines.


                               6-17

-------
6.5  DETERMINATION OF CEM OUTPUT IN THE FIELD

     The values  used to convert raw data to  final  output read-

ings  in terms of emission rates  had to  be determined  in  the

field to provide  data  for performance specificaiton and QA.   It

was important that the field values be accurately determined and

reflect the  values transcribed for the  final listings  (Subsec-

tion  6.1)  in order that field test data reflect  the  quality of

the final  data listings.  The procedures used  for  reducing CEM

data in the field are outlined below:


Reading of Raw Strip Charts—

     Scale deflection  percentages were  read from  strip  charts

and used   without conversion  to  parts  per  million  of  SO2  or

percentages  of 02  for  system response and  drift tests.   For

calibration error and system relative accuracy tests,  conversion

of scale deflections  (averages of three points for system rela-

tive accuracy) were multiplied by the appropriate span gas assay

and divided  by the last previous span gas  reading  to make this

conversion, as indicated by the following equation:

     ppm SO2  or % O2 = reading, % of scale x            (Eq. 6-5)

                    assay of span gas
                 span gas reading, % of scale



Determination of Dry Concentrations—

     Dry  S02  and O2  concentrations  had  to  be determined to

correlate  CEM and  manual methods data  during  system  relative

accuracy tests.   This  was accomplished  by  multiplying raw data
                               6-18

-------
values by  the  factor 100/(100 - M), where M  is  the appropriate

moisture content.  The M  values for inlet SO2,  inlet 02,  outlet

SO2,   and  outlet..02 were  determined separately,  as  discussed in

Subsection 6.3.3.


6.6  DETERMINATION OF PARTICULATE AND NO  CONCENTRATIONS
                                        X

     Particulate  and  NO   concentrations  were  determined  to
                         J^

characterize the  effects  of  the  FGD  system  on  these two para-

meters.  Approved sampling techniques and representative process

operation were needed during  the tests to obtain representative

concentrations.   The  following  procedures  were  followed  to

ensure this:

     1.   Plant  personnel  were  consulted  to  ensure  that  the
          tests were not  performed  during process upsets (e,g.,
          soot blowing,  changing of boiler load, etc.).

     2.   Process  operations  were  observed  by  field personnel
          during the tests  to ensure  that any unexpected upsets
          were noted.

     3.   The  U.S.  Environmental  Protection Agency Reference
          Methods  5  and  7 were  used  to  perform the particulate
          and NO  tests.
                Jv

     4.   Representative  sampling  locations  were  chosen,  as
          discussed in Subsection 6.2 and illustrated in Figures
          3-1 and 3-2.

     5.   Inlet  and  outlet samples were taken  concurrently to
          ensure representativeness  of samples  to  the same gas
          stream.

Procedures,  apparatus,  and calculations used during the tests

are presented in Appendix C.
                               6-19

-------
          APPENDIX

CALIBRATION GAS CERTIFICATION
     AND FGD INFORMATION
             A-l

-------
                            CONTENTS


                                                            Page

Calibration Gas Certification                               A-3

Coal Assay Analyses                                         A-10

1-Hour and 24-Hour Data Listings (January 25 through
 March 1, 1980)                                             A-15

Data Frequency Distributions (January 25 through
 March 1, 1980)                                             A-54

1-Hour and 24-Hour Data Listings (March 2 through
 March 19, 1980)                                            A-70

Data Frequency Distributions (March 2 through March 19,
 1980)                                                      A-90
                              A-2

-------
                                            LIQUID CARBONIC
                                             SubsiHiur ol Houaon Niiutil Cti Coifamion

                            SPECIALTY GAS and CHEMICAL PRODUCTS

                                  CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
           Pedco Environmental
                                                      Date:
                                                                 3-6-80
           11499 Chester Road
           Gincinnatif Ohio ^ 5274 6

           Attention;  Steve Howie
                                                 Ref. #	. ..--	-,
                                                                  x"'
                                                 Curt. P.O. *      /fel?9-l69-333-X
                                           Product

                                         Cyl. Serial
                                            No.
                                        SiAL 2328
                                                             i"
                                                        Cyl. Serial
                                                           No.
                                          Cyl. Serial
                                             No.
 Opponents
                Requested
       r Dioxide
 NBtrogen
                Balance
  Actual
Balance
Actual
Actual
 Cyl. Volume
Valve No.
             150  cf.
                  660
           Total Cyl. Pressure     2000-csi.
 Mthod of Analysis:


 _ Gas Chromat.ngrapby
        2521pprn
                                 N
                                                  Certified By:
                                                              John Sdv/ards
                                             A-3
FORM St-02991 REV. 9/72
                         It is recommended the above cylinders not be depleted
                              below 50 psig unless otherwise indicated.
                                                                                PRINTED IN U.S.A.

-------
                                           LIQUID CARBONIC
                                            Subsidiary of Houxton Ntturil C»t Corpora/on

                           SPECIALTY GAS and CHEMICAL PRODUCTS

                                 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
 To:
Pedco Environmental
         1 1/.|.Q
         Cincinnati,  Ohio  45246
         Attention;   St.pyp Hnwi
                                            Date: .

                                            Ref. #
               Cust. P.O. #
                             3-6-80
                                                            79-169-333-X
                                          Product

                                         Cyl. Serial
                                           No.
                                      SGAL  2312
                                                   Cyl. Serial
                                                      No.
                                          Cyl. Serial
                                             No.
 Components
 Sulfur Dioxide

 Nitrogen
           Requested
           250ppm

           Balance
   Actual
254ppm

Balance
Actual
Actual
Cyl. Volume
CGA Valve No.
         150  cf.
                                        Total Cyl. Pressure
Method of Analysis:


	Gas Chromatography


	TlRin''' T\'BS St. an rig Trio
             486ppm S02/Bal.  N

            2521ppm S02/Bal.  K
                                        Certified By:
                         John Edv.'ards
                                            A-4
•ORM St-02991 REV. 9/72
                        It is recommended the above cylinders not be depleted
                             below 50 psig unless otherwise indicated.
                                                                               PRINTED IN U.S.A.

-------
                                            LIQUID CARBONIC
                                             SubsiftiWY of Houtton N»tt#»l Git
                           SPECIALTY GAS and CHEMICAL PRODUCTS
                                  CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
                TVivi rnnrnprrhpl
         11499  Chester Road
        Cincinnati, Ohio 45246
                                 Date: .

                                 Ref. #
                                                                  1-6-80
                                 Cust. P.O. /  P5I79-164-333-X
         At.t.orrhi on •.    SJ-.PVP  Knv-.n
                                           Product

                                         Cyl. Serial
                                            No.
                                       3 GAL  2331
                                        Gas  I.lixture
                                        Cyl. Serial
                                           No.
                                                                               Cyl. Serial
                                                                                  No.
 q^nponents

    flfur  Dioxide
    trogen
Requested

200Cppra

Balance
                                       Actual
                                    2000pprn

                                    Balance
Actual
Actual
 Cyl. Volume
IA Valve No.     660
                                                  Total Cyl. Pressure
                                                 2000psi
 Athod of Analysis:
      Using  i:3S  Standards
             486ppm 302/Bal. N

            2521ppm S
                             Certified By:    John 3d wards
FORM St-02991 REV. 9/72
                                             A-5

                        it is recommended the above cylinders not be depleted
                              below 50 psig unless otherwise indicated.
                                                                                PRINTED IN U.S.A.

-------
                                            LIQUID CARBONIC
                                             Subuditty ol Houtton Ntturtl Gu Cotpoetlion

                            SPECIALTY GAS and CHEMICAL PRODUCTS

                                  CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
 To:      Fec'.oo Znvironmentnl  Inc.
                          Rnari
          Cincinnati,  Ohio  ^5246
                  nn ;
                                   Date:
                              3-6-80
                                   Ref. #
                                  Cust. P.O. #  P3I79-l6fr-333-X
                                           Product

                                          Cyl. Serial
                                            No.
                                       SGAL 2330
                                         Cyl. Serial
                                            No.
                                           Cyl. Serial
                                              No.
 Components
  Sulfur DioxiGc

  ;\itro;-:en
 Requested
 Balance
   Actual
Balance
Actual
Actual
 Cyl. Volume
 CGA Valve No.
150  cf.
                              Total Cyl. Pressure
 Method of Analysis:
      Gas  Chrornatngrflphy
                      I rt Q v»ri r-
               6ppra S02/iial

            2521 ppia SOg/Bal
                              Certified By:
                                                                  John  L'dwards
                                             A-6
FORM St-02991 REV. 9/72
                         It is recommended the above cylinders not be depleted
                              below 50 psig unless otherwise indicated.
                                                                                PRINTED IN U.S.A.

-------
3333
                                                  DRY MOLECULAR WEIGHT DETERMINATION
                      // ->
PLANT   f-V '-' •'   CV.V •
DATF  /^'  /7~V/
                                                                         COMMENTS:
                                     TE ST NO
           SAMPLING TIME (24-hr CLOCK)
           SAMPLING LOCATION    .£.
           SAMPLE TYPE (BAG, INTEGRATED, CONTINUOUS).
           ANALYTICAL METHOD _££H±	
           AMBIENT TEMPERATURE.
           OPERATOR    ^/V  5^
           .ORSAT  LEAK CHECKED
^-x^^ RUN
GAS ^^^^
C02
02(NET IS ACTUAL 02
READING MINUS ACTUAL
C02 READING)
CO(NET IS ACTUAL CO
READING MINUS ACTUAL
02 READING)
N 2 (NET IS 100 MINUS
ACTUAL CO READING)
1
ACTUAL
READING
JO
/?, 75


NET
J9
>y.6o


2
ACTUAL
READING
O.oo
$•*>*


NET
0.00
/J.»<3


3
ACTUAL
READING
O . A fc
AAo


NET
: . a t
^•^


AVERAGE
NET
VOLUME
«:!,o5
yp.^



MULTIPLIER
44/100
32/100
28/iQO
a/ioo
TOTAL
MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF
STACK GAS (DRY BASIS)
Md, Ib'lb-mole
. -'/
•^J3A



   >

-------
          Afl
                                             DRY MOLECULAR WEIGHT DETERMINATION
PLANT.
DATE.
                ,,  r. >-,0


2
ACTUAL
READING
6/60
13 fr


NET
. A
a£o


3
ACTUAL
READING
o.eo
< ~\


NET
4.**
/:.<>•>


AVERAGE
NET
VOLUME
0.'»
/•* • j 3



MULTIPLIER
44/100
32/100
1m
a/100
TOTAL
MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF
STACK GAS (DRY BASIS)
Md, Ib/lb-mole
•n> '" C
y. c /



00

-------
>
                                            DRY MOLECULAR WEIGHT DETERMINATION
   353 i  Afi
      PLANT
      DATE  l>.|7
Ti.
      SAMPLING TIME (24 hr CLOCK).
      SAMPLING LOCATION  *• A P.
     SAMPLE TYPE (BAG, INTEGRATED, CONTINUOUS).
     ANALYTICAL METHOD _
     AMBIENT TEMPERATURE.
     OPERATOR

     .ORSAT LEAK CHECKED  S
^^^^ RUN
GAS ^^^^
C02
(tyNET IS ACTUAL 02
READING MINUS ACTUAL
C02 READING)
CO(NET IS ACTUAL CO
READING MINUS ACTUAL
02 READING) ,
N£ {NET !S 100 MINUS
ACTUAL CO READING)
1
ACTUAL
READING
Q.OO
/mo


NET
•),oo
M 1 fi
!-\ • /J


2
ACTUAL
READING
0,^0
/«?. 7<


NET
c. c>°
P.-r-'V


3
ACTUAL
READING
€'• '-•
/P. 7*


NET
i- ,*y
;r.7J


AVERAGE
NET
VOLUME
c. ,--•-•
'.J,7\



MULTIPLIER
4VlOO
32/100
28/100
a/ioo
TOTAL
MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF
STACK GAS (DRY BASIS)
Md, Ib'lb-mole
o.cc
4 ." 'I
/ • ••* i




-------
                                                   DIVISION
                           COAL SAMPLING AND INSPECTION OFFICE
                                    4800 FORBES AVENUE
                              PITTSBURGH. PENNSYLVANIA 15213
.S.  AIR FORCE
iN  AtlTONIO ALC-SFSC
LLLY AFB,  TEXAS   782H1
                                       February 25,  1980
      G*ntlemen/Ladies:

      The analysis of the umpie submitted by   Rickenbacker Air  Force Base, Ohio

      covering    97^.38     to"»°f    1^ Inch by \  Inch               coal ddrmed on your

      contract No.  DLA-600-79-D-l6?6               and Item  No. 9

      by    Yancey Minerals               ea  1/10-17       ,19 80   fcMroOo«>:

U«iit,.~
V^lflil* nutter

Ath
To'?'
S^rffvf

AS RECEIVED
10.0
11780
DRY COAL
11.6
49.1-
9.3
100.0
2. -9
13080
This information is for the use of (he Government and the dealer or operator furnishing the coal. It
is confidential until it t$ published by the U. S. Government.
     Sample No.
          Lib No.  K99^17    Mine   Horizon,  Ohio
     Sampler No.   1         Ash-Softening temp.

     RRcarNos. .  Truck Delivery
                                                    F3.L
     Remarks:
Can
     Analysis supervised by
     f ORR6ST E. WALKER
                                        A-10
                                                Sincerely youn.
                                      A. WELSH

-------
                        COAL SAMPLING AND INSPF.CTION OFFICE
                                  4800 FOKKF.S AVENUE
                           PriTSlllMGH. PENNSYLVANIA  15213
                                                      February  25,
 Gentlemen/Ladies:
                                                          »
 Thr analysis of the sample submitted by  Rickenbacker  Air  Force Base,  Ohio
'covering    977.68       lonsof

 contract NJ.   DLA-600-79-D-1 676

 by   Yancey Minerals
                          Inch  by k.  Inch                corf delivered on your

                                     »"d Item  No.  9

                             °"  1/17-29       .1980    basfollow:;:

MnicM.ro
V«T,|:Vm,»,,
Fjtrri rifhnn

To f *j 1
c,,,.
Bniish ih-rnwl units
AS RECEIVED
8.5
12030
DRY COAL
11.6
9.3
100.0
3.0-
13110
This information is for the use of the Government and the dejler or operator furnishing the coal. It
is confidential until it is published by the U. S. Government.
 Sample No.
           Lab. No. K99^l8    Mine  Horizon,  Ohio
 Sampler No.   1          Ash-Softening temp.

 RKcarNos.   Truck Delivery..
                                        Degrees F.
F.S.I.
Remjrki
Can  #2320
Anal>\is supr.xsed by
FOKHEST E WALKEH
l>r-^.-i/ 11 <**>tr. Coal Anatnit
                                        A-ll
                                               Sincerely yours.
                                   ROBERT A. WELSH
                                   Coal S«nv/i'i{ fnJ InlprctiO*

-------
..     -    --
MI  A:.:-. '.MO Ai.e
riU Y  A:-1!-,  TKXA
               732 Vl
                             COAL PREPARATION DIVISION
                        COAL SAMPLING AND INSPECTION OFFICE
                                 4SOO FORBES AVENUE
                          PITTSBURGH. PENNSYLVANIA  15213
      April  2, I960
 Gentlemen/Ladies:

 The an.«!ysis of the sample submitted by    Rickenbacker Air Force Base,  Ohio

 covering   989.15       lonsof   I3u Inch by  \ Inch                  coal delivered on your

 contract No. DLA-600-79-D-1663                   and Item  No.   4

 by   Peibody  Coal CD-r.-.ar.v           on  2.7-1;;         .I960

Wniv'iif- , ,
Vnlaliip matt»r
FjucH r3fhf«p 	
A^S
Tof-,1
«:,jf.,r
Rrifi^ fh?rmjt units
AS RECEIVED
r f
~ • "s
12610
DRV COM
«
^5.8
^7.7
•6.5
100.0
* *
3.9
. -135^10
This information is for the use of the Government and the dealer or operator furnishing the coa!. It
is confidential until it is published by the U. S. Government.
Sample No.   7

Sampler No.  1
                             Lab.No.;L00268    Mine  Broken Aro,  Ohio

                             Ash-Softening temp.              Degrees F.          F.S.I.
           i'ruck  Delivery
Remarks:
                 Can #2140
Analysis supervised by
FORHESf E.WALKER
     / m cHtrft.  Coal Aaalynt
                                        A-12
                                              Sincerely yours.
ROBERT A. WELSH
Coal 54fft/>/inf and IniprctiOH

-------
               782*il
                                                  in v
                        CUAI. SAMI'LIM! AN!> INDUCTION OFFICE
                                  4800 FOUUKS AVENUK
                           PltTSBURGH. PENNSYLVANIA  15213
                                                      April  2, 1930
 Gentlemen/Ladies:

 The analysis of the sample submitted by    Rickenbacker  Air Fors-3  Base,  Ohio

 covering  981-5*1        tonsof   1^ Inch by  \ Inch                   coal delivered on y;
contract No. DLA-600-79-D-1663 and Ite:n
by Peabody Coal Company on 2/15-28


Volatile rpit'*r.. _ . . .



Strffur .
Hriti*>. therjpil lmi**
AS RECEIVED
S.6 .
12380
.1980 is as follows:
DRY COAL
*48.6
6.6
100.0
3.7
13JJ70
This information is for the use of the G.overnme nt and the dealer or operator furnishing the coal. It
is confidential until it is published by the U. S. Government.
Sample So.   8
            Lab.No. .  L00269   Mine    Broken Aro., Ohio
Sampler No.-  1           Ash-Softening temp.

RRcarNos.  7ruck  Delivery
                                         Degrees F.
                     F.S.I.
Remark* •
Can #2^73
Analysis supervised by
FORREST E.WALKER
      it chtrft.
                           A-13
                                               Sincerely yours.
ROBERT A. WELSH
Coal Stitpttnf tnJ Intprciion

-------

                          >AL SAMl'UNG AND INSPECTION OFFICE
                                 4800 FORBES AVENUE .
                          PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA  15213
.S.  AIR FOKCt:
AN ANTONIO  ALC-SPSC
-:LLY  APH, TEXAS   7821*1 -
                                                           April  21,  1980
 Gentlemen/Ladies:

 The analysis of the sample submitted by   Rickenbacker AFB,  Ohio

 covering   979.80      «««of   l»q Inch by  0

 contract No.    DLA-600-79-D-1676                and Item  No.  9

 by    Yancy Minerals                 on   3/6-1 'I        .1980
                                                                         coal delivered on your
                                                                         is as follows:

MniO „*
Vnl,t;l» miff"
Fji^d rifhnn

Tofil

Briiivli thrrmil nni'< 	 . 	 	 	 _
AS RECEIVED
9.3
12030
DRY COAL
^7.0
8.2'
100.0 .
3.1
13260
This information is for the use of the Qovernmrnt and the dealer or operator furnishing the coal. It
is confidential until it is published by the U. S. Government.
Sample No.    9         Lib. So. L00671

Sampler No.  1          Ash-Softening temp.

RRcarNos.  Truck Delivery
                                             Mine  Horizon-Ohio

                                                        Degrees F.
F.S.1.
Remsrks:     Can  #2^59
Analysis supervised by
FORREST E.WALKER
           e. Coel A*alvtit
                                          A"14
                                             Sincerely yours.
                                                  KOBERT A. WELSH
                                                  Cotl Simptin

-------
DAILY SUMMARY OF KESULTS
>r
4
1
4
»
•
7"
•
0
10
1 1
12
13
14
16
!•
17
!•
I*
£O
ai
22
a»
24
2&
2*
27
2»
!•
JO
31
32
33
34
39
36
37
30
30
4O
41
42
« j
44
43
"
«'
4O
1
• Ay
,1'J
•» .
Sir
!ia
'-.4
t
LOCATION: RICHENBACKEK AFB i960
OATEI i-25-eo
TIME
0
100
AAA
300
400
500
600
700
MOO
900
1000
. 	 _1JUO - ....
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
>-17ftQ_
' 1600
£l900
2AOO
2100
2200
£300
« AVERAGES
X OF DATA
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
... ME AM. ... 	
STO.DEV.
X STO.OEV.
LOAD E E
IN OUT
*«•«• »**»*» •«««««
99. 4.961 .t>0b
9a. *tf*7 j"01
105. 4.634 .307
105. 4. 4Mb .3IU
XU5.. tt.bbl .106
99. 4.553 .226
99. 4.719 .243
l|k. «,^.j>^ .264
109. 4.591 .222
109. 4.465 .230
. .115., .S.i77 	 	 .JJ6U
118. 4.402 .455
116. *•*«»» •**•*•
ID«, 4,«fc4 .'Of
109. 4.315 .459
103. »«••«• «**«*•
103. «»««»« n»na»a
104. 4.751 .732
104. 5.082 .flld
• Dfc, A.QXk . 7«iH
106. 4.913 .066
106. 4.949 .029
... .Lfife* 	 i.USJL .631
23. 20. 20.
96T AS. A).
99. 4.315 .222
116. 5.084 .866
107. 
40
41
42
43
44
40
4«
47
48
4»
SO
1
2
3
4
5
e
S7
sa
5B
oo
61
<2
.3
A 4
t*
6O
*7
«a
ee
7O
71
7i
73
74
73
V

-------
        DAILY  SUMMARY OF
LOCATION: RICKENBACKEK AFB i960
DATES 1-26-80
TIME
" 0
100
200
300
400
.... 	 .500. ....
600
700
aoo
900
1000
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
'Ie6°
£1900
2000
2100
2200
2300
« AVERAGES
X OF DATA
U t kl t UIIU
LOAD
105.
105.
105.
98.
96T
105.
1 17.
119.
117.
no!
109.
109.
106.
99 *~
99.
99.
105.
105.
105^.
24.
100,

t
IN
4.641"
5.060
5.001
4.994
4.960
H.9Q5
4.932
4.917
A.A07
4.664
4.962
5.002
4.964
5.142
5.201
.5.. 269
5.219
5.116
5.314
5.295
5.201
24.
100.

fc
OUT
.764
.647
.585
.654
... .oaa
.630
.716
."11
.557
.519
.499
.381
T1QH
.396
.364
*,,,
.462
.444
.356
.446
24.
100T

tFF
63.0
67.2
09. «
06.3
66.8
Bb.Q .._ .
63.2
65.4
*n,a
06.6
09.5
90*0
92.3
92.3
93.0
... 9J.6 	
92.0
91.0
91. 5
93.3
91.6
90.7
24.
100.

MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MtAJ*
STO.DEV.
X 3TD.OEV.
 98.
119.
  7.
  6.
4.641
5.314
.336  63.180
.630  93.621
 .146     .149
2.929  27.97*
       3.206
       3.567
24-HOUR REMOVAL EFICItNCY USING
       1
       .   fc   «  f   ...
       1   IN   OUT
                    I
NOTES  (MEAN)   IS DEFINED ASS
             X
.  	THE  MtAN FOB .X...QA..YS  USING T-HUUK AVtRAGtS
                                                                                                                                               IO
                                                                                                                                               II
                                                                                                                                               12
                                                                                                                                               IS
                                                                                                                                               17
                                                                                                                                               t*
                                                                                                                                               18
                                                                                                                                               2O
                                                                                                                                               21
                                                                                                                                               22
                                                                                                                                               U
                                                                                                                                               24
                                                                                                                                               23
                                                                                                                                               28
                                                                                                                                               27
 4«
 47
 48
" 4»
 30
                                                                                                                              Bl
                                                                                                                              54
                                                                                                                              BB
                                                                                                                              Bfl
                                                                                                                             "B7
                                                                                                                              no
                                                                                                                              BB
                                                                                                                              BO
                                                                                                                                               A3
                                                                                                                                               SB
                                                                                                                                               B7
                                                                                                                                               72
                                                                                                                                              " 73

-------
DAILY SUMMARY OF HESULTS
LOCATION: RICKENBACKEK AFb I9»o
DATES 1*27-80
TIME
0
100
?aa
300
QUO
500
600
700
nan
900
1000
	 110.0 .. . . „
1200
1300
i«nn
1500
1600
> we. .
i v»oo
£ i««o
^ lOOa
2100
2200
2.300
« AVERA6E8
X OF DAIA
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MEAN
! STD.OEV.
S STD.DEV.
24-HOUR REMOVAL
1
IM.EANJ E i E
1 IN
'
»
LOAD E t
IN OUT
114. 5.175 .461
119. 5.263 .337
111. ^. M* t'^O
103. 5.569 .353
105. 5.432 .374
102. ... . 5.513 taiaua
108. 5.369 •*«*•*
106. 5.364 *««•««
IIS. «.J** «««>f|f
115. 5.116 *•*•••
120. 5.273 •»•««»
119* . b.£3b . ..567
118. 5.142 .614
118. 5.271 .664
HI. *.*io r«i^«
117. 5.204 .369
104. 5.424 .260
-.11)4...- i»551 „ .197
104. 5.494 .285
106. 5.601 .304
10t- S-OP7 .2«S
106. 5.255 .249
106. 5.375 .302
l(Lfc. SJfif .*LQ8
24. 24. la.
100. 100. 7ST
102. 5.116 .197
120. 5.601 .664
HO. ^,340 ,373
6. .138 .140
6. 2.586 37.6*1
EFICIENCY USING
? «>3.yi5X
UUT
i
NOTE: CMEANI is DEFINED AS:
X
THE MtAN FQN X OAT5 USING Y-MUUH
tFK
91.1
93.6
oo_n
93.7
93.1
aaattu
»»U8»
«««»»
MMIftf/f
UttHtt*
tenon
tt9,2
86. 1
87.4
AQ.fl
92.9
95.1
96.4
94.8
94.6
9fl.T
«»S.3
94.4
96.1
10.
J^. - - - -
87.395
96.446
92.982
2.771
2.980


AVL"A&t 5

:
a
3
4
a
•
7
•
•
10
12
11
14
II
1*
17
I*
IB
20
21
22
2}
24
23
26
27
28
t*
JO
31
12
11
14
ia
v>
17
it
M
4O
41
42
41
44
4S
te
47
40
49
SO
ai
52
ai
84
35
3fl
37
38
30
8O
61
82
61
r.4
r.
e
7
a
0
0
71
3
4
3
•>
-------
DAILY SUMMARY OF RESULTS

LOCATION: RICKENBACKEK AFB I9ao
DATES 1-26-80
TIME LOAD E E
IN OUT
0 1U6. b.189 .260
100 100. 5.274 .2Tb
200 103. S.J12 T«no
* 300 100. 5.376 .366
400 104. 5.420 .382
	 500 . 1M....! 7 00. 	 »U«._-.4..993.... .. 9fc.
MINIMUM too. 4.901 .iss
MAXIMUM 120. 5.584 .tt,>9
MEAN 	 .IQft,. i.£9J. . .Hlo.
STD.DEV. 9. .227 .213
X STD.DEV. 4. 4.296 Si. 102
24-HOUR REMOVAL EFICIENCY USING
1
! 	 tMEANJ E. . E : 92^i??x
1 IN OUT
1 '
NOTEI tMEANJ IS DEFINED AS:
X
... . THE MEA.M FOR. A DSY3 USING Y-HOUH

fcFF
95.0
14.8
S4.^
•*3.2
93.0
92T0
91.7
92.9
«!,»
««00»
«7.2
05.1
84.7
B5.7
it A. a
90.7
91.1
95.5
95.9
95.7
9fcT(i
96.8
95.6
91^9
23.
9hT
84.671
9b.769
92.254
3.752
4.067


AVtHAGtS



,N
2
J
4
S
.
7
•
a
10
1 1
12
1>
14
IB
I*
IT
!•
1.
20
21
22
21
24
23
It
27
2.
a
JO
31
32
33
34
30
1<
37
M
30
40
41
42
43
44
49
4.
47
40
4.
9O
91
02
83
84
as
ae
B7
98
9B
eo
et
«2
83
64
es*
68
87
88
•>
7O
71
72
73
74
79
V

-------
DAILY SUMMARY OF MESULTS
LOCATION: RICKENBACKEK AFB i960
DATE: i-29-eo
3
TIME
9
6
7 0
• too
10 300
" 400
12 5.U1L
600
TOO
'• 900
17 1000
" 1»UQ
" 1200
20 1300
21 1400
" 1500
" 1600
" > 1700
" L 1800
" vO l»00
" aaaa
** 2100
" 2200
10 	 	 2.10JL... 	
31
32 0 AVERAGES
33 i nr n*T*
34 MINIMUM
33 MAXIMUM
38 MEAN
37 9TD.DEV.
38 I STD.DEV.
3B
40 24-HOUR REMUV<
1
"! IMEANJ t ,
1 IN
«4
" Y_
" NOTE: CMEANI
X
40 THE ME/U
-J
LOAD E E
IN OUT
105. 5.115 .365
105. 5.229 .390
105. 5.261 .344
1U5. 5.066 .400
105. 5_.L9U .335
105. 5.196 .341
105. 5.080 .400
117. 000000 000000
114. 5.25V .571
112.. 'J.Oli .529
112. 5.430 .416
103. 5.261 .434
09 T M***M* MMMMMM
107. 0*0000 000000
116. 5.150 .500
UP.. JB₯*f* . 0»SB«fl
112. 000000 000000
112. 000000 000000
115. 000000 »***0*
115. 0*0000 0*000*
115. 000f00 *4»**«
24. 14. 14.
IDA. «4. •>«.
99. 4.613 .335
117. 5.430 .576
5. 000000 000000
5. 000000 00000C
kL EFICIENCV UblNG
E ! •VQoX
OUT
IS DEFINED AS:
« pOK X DAYS USING T-MUUK

EFF
92.9
92.6
93.0
92!l
93.6
93.4
92.1
"a"!*
92.3
91.6
mmmmm '
90.1
00000
00000
00000
00000
14.
6V. 002
93.552
000000
000000
000000


AVLKAlitS



i
2
3
4
t
0
7
10
1 1
12
13
14
10
17
10
10
20
21
22
23
24
29
20
27
20
30
32
33
•4
39
37
30
4O
41
42
43
44
4B
40
47
40
40
90
91
•12
83
84
99
88
97
98
80
BO
01
82
83
A4
bS
BB
87
BB
O9
7O
71
72
73
4
9

-------
DAILY SUMMARY OF RESULTS
LOCATION! RICKENBACKEK
DATE! 1-30-80
TIME
0
100
200
300
400
5J)0
600
700
aao
900
1000
	 1190
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
> 1700
2000
2100
2200
2300
* AVEHASES
X OF DAfA
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
_ 	 MEAN 	 „ .
STD.DEV.
X 8TO.OEV.
LOAD E
IN
112. •*«•••
112. »»MMMM
112, MMMMHf
112. HMMMMM
112. HMMMMM
112. MMMMMM
112. MMMMMM
120. MMMMMM
122. ••»«»•
118. 4.583
121. 4.923
116. 4.97t>
117. 5.164
100. 5.217
_..1»3*.._ 5.112. -
103. »»*»**
103. 5.060
101. S-S81
103. 5.421
103. 5.491
2«. 13.
100. *4.
100. 4.446
122. 5.581
...Ills. »»«»»*
7. •*«*«»
AFB 1900
E
OUT
EFF
*•«*«« «MMMM
*•*•«• MBMMM
9HHm\Mm\ MUMMM
HMMMMM
istaaa
*»MMMM
**«•*•
HMMMMM
MMMMMM
.182
.410
.511
.422
.625
*•**«*
.563
.514
.514
MMMMM
MMfMM
Hunan
MttOMM
MMMMM
*gMMM
96.0
94.6
91.7
69.7
O2.O
91.8
88.0
U5.6
• **«•
88.9
90.9
90.5
90.6
90.6
13. M.
5*T 54. " '
.182
.7)8
**•««•
»••«•*
24-HOUR REMOVAL EFICIENCY USIN6
1
	 CMEANJ E. ,_ E : jOOoX
1 IN OUT
NOTE! IMEAN)
X
THE ME AN

IS DEFINED AS:
FOR X UAYS UblNG T-HUIIK


85.572
96.022
»»•••* .. . .,


AVtRAGtS . 	
	 	




IT
IS
18
20
21
21
23
24
29
27
28
ts
3d
31
32
33
38
38.
17
38
M
4O
41
42
3
4
9
7
8
9
30
91
83
84
99
98
97
98
98
6O
ei
82
A3
.4
65
0
C
e
e
7
71
72
73
74
79
V

-------
DAILY  SUMMARY  OF  KEbULTS
LOCATION: RICKENBACKEK AFb i960
DATE: 1-31-80
TIME
0
too
POO
300
400
	 5.U0 	
600
700
900
1000
1200
1300
1500
1600
Jf 1 7 QO
' |000
H 1900
2000
2100
2200
	 £300 	 _
* AVERAGES
X Of DATA
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
. .. ME AM 	 _ 	
STD.DEV.
X STD.DEV.
24-HOUR REMOVAL
1
. . IHEANl E i E
1 IN
v
LOAD E f.
IN
104. 4.963
1°*. S.l1^
104. 5.441
104. 5.255
117* 5.062
117. 5.052
f 31 . «, AT^t
125. 5.133 1
118. 4.927
119. 5.184
119. 5.027
OUT
.475
.53b
582
.492
.394
.386
.502
.438
.132
1391
.493
. -<»n
121. 5.431 .572
108. *•*•** «•»«*«
106. 5.553 .985
110. 5.445 .529
IO*JT *T2*fc -U«Q
110. 5.429
115. 5.322
Jl§._ ._5_,jJ4?
24. 22. 22
100,. 92, 92
104. 4.076
125. 5.b53 1
113. b.iMl
7. .185
6. 3.544 S3
EFICIENCT USING
OUT
l
NOTE: (MEAN] IS DEFINED AS:
X
THE. MEAN FOR A DATS USING


.142
•
.370
.132
*546
.184
,S9«

Y-HUUh
tFF
91.0
89.2
91.0
92.5
92.4 	
88.5
91.3
90 0
77.9
8H.8
91.3
92.5
90.2
89.5
*0*0«
00000
82.3
90.3
«n.»,
91.9
89.7
07.1 	
22.
92.
77.940
92.982
89.510
3.459
3.864

AVERAGES
i
                                                                                                                                                                                      IO
                                                                                                                                                                                      II
                                                                                                                                                                                      12^
                                                                                                                                                                                      1J
                                                                                                                                                                                      14
                                                                                                                                                                                      IS
                                                                                                                                                                                      !•
                                                                                                                                                                                      IT
                                                                                                                                                                                      ia
                                                                                                                                                                                      19
                                                                                                                                                                                      20
                                                                                                                                                                                      21
                                                                                                                                                                                      11
                                                                                                                                                                                      23
                                                                                                                                                                                      41
                                                                                                                                                                                      42
                                                                                                                                                                                      49
                                                                                                                                                                                      4C
                                                                                                                                                                                      47 -

-------
DAILY SUMMARY OF RESULTS

LOCATION! R1CKENBACKEH AFb I960
DATES 2- 1-80
TIME
0
too
200
300
400
500
600
700
• 00
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
> 1700
x KS
200O
2100
2200
* AVERAGES
X OF DATA
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
: MEAN.
STD.OEV.
S 9TD.DEV.
24-HOUR REMOVA
1
(MEANL E f
; i IN
V
NOTES (MEANJ
X
THE MtAN
1
	
LOAD E E
IN OUT
110. 5.278 .496
108. 5.225 .413
108. 4.939 .343
108. 4.985 .405
112. 5.442 .445
112. 5.469 .414
121. 5.fc42 ,.407
127. 5.815 .425
119. 6.012 .382
113. 5.365 .621
113. 5.746 «*«»»»
119. 5.667 .535
112. 5.402 »»»»*»
111. 5.477 .415
113. 5.441 .432
110, STS«S Ta19
111. 5.715 .487
109. 5.569 .530
109. 5.532 .540
24. 24. 22.
100. 100. 9PT
106. 4.735 .343
127. 6.208 .621
.113. i.45<> .452.
6. .332 .077
5. 6.066 17.069
L EFICIENCT USING
E ? 9.U7JLM
OUT
i
IS DEFINED AS:
FOR X. DATS USING Y-HUUH

EFF
90.6
92.1
92. iL
93.1
91.9
92.4
91.8
92.4
92.8
92.7
93.6
94.1
08.4
0*00*1
90.6
91.0
92.4
92.1
91.5
90.5
90.2
22.
80.427
94.051
91.67B
1.443
1.574


AVtfiAGtS . 	 __ ... 	 	


2
3
4
7
IO
11
12
13
14
18
17
1*
19
2O
21
22
23
24
23
28
27
a
JO
31
32
33
34
38
37
30
30
4O
41
42
43
44
49
47
48
4»
30
91
92
83
84
98
88
57
88
88
8O
64
es
eft
07
08
70
71
72
73
74
73
V

-------
DAILT  SUMMARY Of HESULTS
x
A
4
*
9
«
7
0
A
10
t 1
12
11
14
ia
16
17
Id
10
20
21
22
2»
2*
26
2ft
27
ia
2«
30
31
92
33
34
39
3ft
37
JO
39
40
41
42
43
44
49
46
"
4t)
40
9U
9 t
92
93
54
33
i!!
LOCATION: RICKENBACKEK
DATE: 2- 2-60
TIME
0
too
200
300
400
600
700
ADO
900
1000
11UQ 	 	
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
•f 17QO
1
CO 1900
2000
2100
2200
• AVERAGES
X OF DAIA
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
ME AM
STD.OEV.
X STO.DEV.
24-HOUR REMOVAL
1
(MEANJ E . E
1 IN
y
NOTES (MEAN) I
X
_ THE MiAi*


LOAD E
IN
106. 5.667
110. b.647
H«. ^,«1*
110. 6.176
110. 6.630
1H7._ -0*935
107. 5.665
107. 5.419
1)7, ^,}«|
117. 5.625
116. 5.635
116. *»»**•
120. ******
1?*. «k.OO«
125. 4.909
113. 5.063
109. 4.996
111. 5.398
Ml. fcTl*«
Ml. 6.333
114. 5.677
24. 22.
107. 4.909
125. 6.935
113. s. no
5. .579
5. 10.153
AFB 19UO
E
OUT
.507
MfdtfHtH
******
Muaoea
tataaa
******
******
******
tuautia
sessae
******
.371
.301
_._.276
.355
.419
.433
.330
.ibfl
11.
•6.
.276
.526
J«f«JLft_
******
******
EFF
91.1
*****
ItKfUfff
*****
00000
Maaaa
*****
*****
*****
00000
*****
*****
MQ ^
92.4
94.1
92.9
92.2
93.2
94.4
11.
"». - .--
69.469
94.446
•00000
******
******
EFICIENCT U3IN6
: *****tu
OUT
i
S DEFINED AS:
FOR x. DAIS us IN


e r-Houh


AWfcRAGhS

•

2
3
4
B
7
IO
II
12
13
14
IB
1.
17
16
1.
?n
21
22
24
23
26
27
2fl
JO
31
32
33
39
IA
37
3*
3*
4O
41
42
43
44
43
4.
47
46
4>
BO
31
S2
83
84
oa
86
87
a*
89
60
61
62
63
64
63
66
67
68
6*
7O
71
72
73
74
78

-------
DAILY SUMMARY OF KESULTS
J
LOCATION: KICKENBACKEH AFb i9oo
DATEJ 2- 3-60
TIME
0
100
200
300
400
	 	 _..50Q 	
600
700
600
900
1000
	 	 	 11QQ 	 _
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
> 1700
to 180°
^ 2000
2100
2200
	 2300
* AVERAGES
X OF DATA
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MEAN
STD.DEV.
X 8TO.OEV.
LOAD t t
IN OUT
kFF
113. »»««»« 00*000 no a an
110. ****** 0«*00e 00000
II2T MMMMMM ««n«
116. b.502 .653
.ll«« 5.255. »0**fl*
2. .146 »**0«0
2. 2.779 *«•»««
93.3
9?. 5
92.5
17.
84.049
9<4.061
000*00
0*»**0
24-HOUR REMOVAL EFICIENCY USING
1
(M.EAN1 E . E I 000««»l
1 IN
NOTE: tMEANJ
x
. THE MEAN

OUT
l
IS DEFINED AS:
FUH ₯ y»YS USING Y-HUUK


AVERAGES 	 	


A



20
21
22
23
24
29
28
27
28
JO
32
34
38
37
38
39
40
4t
42
43
44
49
46
47
48
49
9O
91
17
93
94
99
96
97
98
80
60
61
62
63
A4
63
86
67
66
69
70
71
72
73
74
79

-------
X
2
3
4
9
7
to
1 1
12
13
IS
I*
17
If
19
21
22
2)
24
U
76
11
30
31
32
33
34
39
37
30
3»
40
41
42
43
44
43
46
47
40
49
5O
91
92
33
34
33
96
\97
DAILY SUMMAHY OF HESULTS

LOCATIONS RICKENBACKEK AFb 1900
DATES 2- 4-80
TIME LOAD E E
IN OUT
0 104. 5.583 .500
100 103. 5.465 .484
2AA |0O 5.490 ' «$M
300 109. 5.351 .617
400 113. 5.357 .624
500 110. 5.291 .fcOu
600 111. 5.306 .586
700 115. 5.316 .642
•an \9*t 5.919 .721
900 123. 5.323 .014
1000 130. 5.126 .766
	 _111)0_ 	 	 	 lll._ b.231 .042
1200 123. 5.529 .693
1300 124. 5.520 1.166
1500 118. »»«•** *•*»««
1600 114. »«»««* «*»••«
> 1700 	 	 	 U.6.* 	 S.H70 	 .52M.
' 1800 116. 5.538 .414
\^ 1900 114. 5.505 .360
2000 113, 5-.5H .flSfl
2100 114. 5.535 .473
2200 116. 5.574 .35?
* AVERAGES 24. 22. 22.
X OF DATA 100. «2T 92,
MINIMUM 103. 5.126 .357
MAXIMUM 131. 5.574 1.166
MEAN U6t 5,422 Bb05
STD.DEV. 7. .124 .190
X 8TO.DEV. 6. 2.290 31.17*
24-HOUR REMOVAL EFICIENCY USING
1
(MEAN) E • E : 88.839X
1 IN OUT
V 1
NOTES (MEAN) IS DEFINED AS:
X
THE MEAN IQR JL-D.AY3 ysifjfi Y-HUUN


EFF
91.0
91.1
08.5
88.4
89.0
87.9
84.7
05.0
03.9
67.5
78.9
67 .2
»*«0«
90.4
92.5
93.5
91.5
93.6
93.0
22.
70.884
93.591
88.003
3.586
4.038


AYEKAttS



f\
4
7
10
11
12
13
14
IB
1ft
IT
1ft
19
20
21
22
23
24
29
26
27
26
3O
31
32
34
39
37
39
4O
41
42
43
44
49
46
47
4ft
0
O
1
2
3
4
9
6
7
6
9
60
61
62
63
U
63
66
67
66
69
7O
71
72
73
74
79

-------
DAILY
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
LOCATION: RICKENBACKEK AFB I9uo
DATE: 2* 5-so
TIME
0
too
200
300
400
, 	 . . 500
600
700
• 00
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
! 1400
1500
1600
> 1700
N) I8°°
°^ 2000
2100
2200
2300
« AVERAGES
X OF DATA
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MEAN
3TD.OEV.
X 8TD.OEV.
24-HOUR REMOV
1
. (MEAN] £ ,
1 IN
y
NOTE: (MEANI
X
THE MfcA

LOAD E E EFF
IN OUT
107. 5.633 .627 88.9
107. 5.547 .659 88.1
107. 5.19.Q . .690 67. a
113. b.472 .574 89.5
113. 5.549 ,b50 90.5
... .-l.l.l. __. -5...4..11 .il.5 90.0
113. 5.401 .305 94.3
107. 5.411 .292 94.6
10ft. S.160 T1PA 91.9
94. 5.503 .224 95.9
97. 5.299 .386 92.7
1|5_A 5.194 .434.. 91.6
107. 4.513 .327 92. B
107. 4.821 .351 92.7
105. 5.120 .SOS 94,0
108. 5.090 .270 94.7
118. 4.910 .321 93.5
...Jl«* 5.1151 .265 9«.7
114. •«»**« *•«»»• **»•»
112. 5.915 .540 90.7
110. 5.767 T«92 91,5
114. 5.87b .591 89.9
115. 5.251 na»»ntt »•»/»•
. . . I.16_«_ .. 6_,45J *»*»»# IfBIHUL
24. 23. 21. 21.
too. «b. a«. MS. ....
94. 4.513 .224 87.430
118. 6.057 .690 95.931
110. 5.375 .432 92.000
6. .364 .147 2.435
5. 6.768 34.0*1 2.647
AL EFICIENCV USING
E : 91.9711
OUT
1
IS OEFINEU AS:
N FOR X DAYS USING Y-HUUK AVtKAGtS . 	 	


r<



20
21
22
23
24
29
26
27
a
30
31
32
33
34
39
36
37
38
4O
41
42
43
44
47
48
4»
90
91
83
84
89
96
S7
98
60
61
62
63
66
07
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
79
V

-------
DAILY SUMMARY OF RESULTS
LOCATION: RICKENBACKEH AFB i960
OATt: 2- 6-eo
TIME
0
too
2OO
300
4UO
	 5(10
600
700
AOO
900
1000
	 .HOP ._...
1200
1300
1400
1500
tbOO
> 1790
N> 1»0°
vj 1900
2000
2100
2200
2300
• AVERAGES
Z OF DATA
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MEAH
STO.OEV.
* STO.OEV.
24-HOUR REMUVA
1
IMEANJ E ,
, 1 IN
f
NOTEi (MEANJ
X
THE MEAN
'i ...
LOAD E E tFF
IN OUT
99. 00*0*« 000*00 00000
99. *•«••• *0000* »«00«
99. 000*00 000000 00000
99. 00*0*0 000000 00000
99. 0000*0 000000 aaaaa
99. 00*000 «00000 00000
99. »0*00'0 00000* 0*000
114. 00*0*0 000000 0*000
116. b.«6b 00000* 00000
116. b.390 V89000 0000*
114. 5.442 1.014 01.4
112. S.47S .942 02.8
115. Srfcfcl ,9)M M1.A
114. 5.692 .735 87.1
104. 5.791 ,7<»3 87.2
97. 5.639 .665 88.2
97. 0***** **00«* 0000*
97. 5.903 000000 0*0*0
QA. «irfck^ MKMK1KI MfMffU
98. 5.512 «0000* 0000*
96. 5.716 0000*0 000*0
90. 5.619 Hmttm Henna
24. 13. 6. 6.
100T 5«T ?». PS.
97. 5.390 .665 81.376
120. 5.903 1.010 88.199
104. 0*«**0 000000 M0000B
a. »*«•** 0*0000 000000
A. *•*•** ••»»•« 00000*
L EFICIENCY USING
E : fOOvY
OUT
i
IS DEFINED AS:
FOR X DAYS USJHG Y-HUUK AVtWAGtS ... ._ ..

:i
4
a
•
7
•
9
to
11
l>
13
14
It
!•
17
It
10
70
21
22
23
24
23
26
27
28
X»
SO
51
32
33
34
39
in
37
3>
30
40
41
42
43
44
48
4fl
47
48
4B
3O
81
12
83
54
33
sa
t7
36
00
60
61
62
A3
A4
f.t>
t.6
C7
«n
fttf
7O
71
72
7J
74
79
7V

-------
DAILY SUMMAHY OF RESULTS
LOCATION: RICKENBACKEH AFH i960
DATEI 2- 7-80
TIME
0
100
200
300
400
„ 	 	 5QQ 	 ....
600
700
800
900
1000
MOO
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
> 1700
N) l8**
°° 2000
2100
2200
2300
• AVERAGES
X OF DATA
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
_ 	 MEAfl 	 	 	 	 .
STO.OEV.
X STO.DEV.
24-HOUR REMOVAL
1
l"EA_Nl t , f
1 IN
	 t
LOAD E
IN
112. 5.712
112. 5.866
112. 5. 151
112. 5.726
112. 5.783
.112. 	 b.Oflti
112. ******
112. 5.754
M«, 5,74P
119. 5.786
116. 5.751
107. 5.726
107. 5.520
110, 5,269
112. 5.403
108. 5.480
1.0.8,.... ...9. .97 3
US. 5.143
118. 5.364
118. S.2SO
118. 5.033
116. 5.21U
24. 23.
100T 96.
107. 4.973
119. 5.666
.113. .i.511
4. .280
4. 5.066
E
OUT
«**«»•
MM**
**•••«
»••»•»
»«««**
. .***»*»
••****
•****»
«**««*
•000*0
******
• MM*
MmMMum
•00000
•**»**
******
*«*0*«
******
••••««
******
*•«««»
0.
•>.
•••**«
.000
-.JJItftft
••••••
••••••
EFICIENCV USING
UU1
i
NOTE: (MEANJ IS DEFINED AS:
X
THE MtAN FOH X DATS USING Y-HOUK
EFF
000**
«0*0*
****.•
00***
***»«
*****
*****
»**«*
»«**»
• 0*0*
*****
*••••
*««««
00000
»»•»*
«*»»»
***•«
J[***JT 	 .... _. 	 ...
*****
*****
SflJftl
0.
••*«••
.000
•*«*«•
*»»»**
•••••• ,


AVt^AGtS 	 	 ..
	 	
;v
2
3
4
9
7
9
IO
II
12
13
14
IB
17
ia
19
2O
21
22
23
24
29
26
27
3O
31
32
*4
39
37
39
39
40
41
42
43
44
49
46
47
49
49
9O
91
92
93
94
99
96
57
98
99
AO
61
62
65
06
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
79

-------
DAILY SUMMARY OF RESULTS
/r
2
3
4
9
7
9
1O
I I
12
Ts
14
16
17
::
20
22
23
23
2ft
24
29
3O
31
32
33
34
J*
37
JB
39
4O
41
42
43
44
43
46
47
49
3u
31
32
33
.14
at
3«
LOCATION: RICKENBACKEH AFB i9oo
OATEI 2- 8-80
TIME
0
too
PQO
300
400
5UO
600
TOO
AHA
900
1000
	 1100
1200
1300
1500
1600
> 1700. 	
to iao°
2100
2200
• AVERAGES
Z OF DATA
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
3foVDEV.~
* 9TO.DEV.
LOAD E t
IN OUT
105. 5.190 ***000
10S. 5.1J7 000000
112. 5.276 000C00
112. 5.280 »00000
112. 	 5.3.1U ttaaau
112. 5.329 000000
112. 5.435 000000
114. 5.140 000000
112. b.22<» 000000
112. . b.213 taaaaa
112. 5.384 .376
111. «**••• **»*0*
111. 5.296 .401
105. 5.187 .314
- 101*.. . 5..27'» . .312
108. 5.089 .309
108. 5.037 .302
IO2. S.flAfe ,2«*
103. 5.111 .280
98. 5.171 .295
JJ19.. 	 5,12? ,£fl.J
24. 23. 11.
100,. 98,. All.
EFF
• 0000
• 0000
00000
00000
00000
00000
• •000
00000
00000
taaat
93.0
****•
91 .8
92.4
93.9
94.1
93.9
94.0
94.5
94.3
94.5
11.
98. 5.037 .280 91.820
121. 5.514 .427 94.512
109. 5*240 0*0*00 000000
5. .125 •••«•*
S. 2.IS2 ••»•••
24-HOUR REMOVAL EFICIENCV USING
1
-LM.EANJ £ , E . 1. f «J0f 81 	
1 IN OUT
t '
NOTE: IMEANJ
X
. THE MEAN

IS DEFINED ASt
f.OK.X..DAT3 USING T-MUUK

000000
000000


AVERAGES



A
2
4
7
10
II
19
13
14
II
1*
17
ia
10
20
21
22
23
24
29
27
2a
10
31
32
33
33
36
37
M
30
4O
41
42
43
44
49
46
47
46
49
9O
91
83
34
93
86
87
31
80
6O
61
62
63
6~9
66
67
68
69
7O
71
72
73
74
78
V

-------
DAILY SUMMARY
OF RESULTS

-i
LOCATIONS RICKENBACKER AFB i9»o
OATEl 2- 9-80
TIME
0
100
PDA
300
400
600
700
800
900
1000
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
> ..170.0 	 	
1 1800
£ 1900
2000
2100
2200
2300
« AVERAGES
X OF DATA
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MEAN
3TO.OEV.
X 3TD.DEV.
24-HOUR REMOVAL
1
IMEANJ.. E , E
: i IN
, ..... .. Y
LOAD
115.
113.
115.
U4t~
11.
11-
16.
16.
18.
18.
19.
19.
104.
_.!9S....
103.
102.
IDS,.
105.
105.
105.
24.
100.
102.
119.
6.
5.
EFICI
OUT
i
E E
IN
5.082
5.215
5.283
5.342
5.393
5.374
S-39H
5.503
5.259
5.456
5.563
5.031
5.701
.5.641
5.556
5.530
S.fcfli
5.653
5,703
24. 24
100, 100
5.082
5.031
.190
3.462 10
ENCY USING
93..J82.I
OUT
.387
.389
.333
.379
I358
.317
.365
.311
!357
.387
.319
.281
!326
.350
.325
.324

.260
.389
.141
.035
.141

EFF
92.4
92.5
93.7
92.9
92,8
93.4
94.1
93.4
94.1
93.5
93.0
94.5
95.1
95.2
94.1
93.7
94-7
94.2
94.3
93.6
24.
10U. 	
9.J.387
95.245
"3.767
.735
.784


i NOTE: (MEAN! IS DEFINED AS:
X
THE MfcAN FOH x DAYS USlHG »-HOUK AVtHAGtS
i
1 _ _. .

,\
2
3
4
7
1O
1 1
12
14
1.
1.
17
1.
1.
2O
21
22
23
24
29
28
27
t>
to
32
33
M
35
IA
37
3.
40
41
42
43
44
48
4.
47
4.
4.
90
81
92
93
84
99
98
97
98
8O
81
82
83
r,4
63
88
07
ea
80
70
71
72
74
79

-------
DART SUMMARY OF HESULTS
LOCATION: RICKENBACKEH
DATEI 2-10-80
TIME
0
too
2AO
300
400
	 _.. . ...500. _ 	
600
700
AOO
900
1000
	 _.. It 00 .._ 	 	
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
> )700
1 1800
M 2000
2100
2200
* AVERAGES
x or DAIA
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MEAN
3TD.OEV.
X STO.OEV.
24-HOUR REMOVE
1
: [MEANJ £ ,
1 IN
t NOTE: (MEAN]
X

LOAD E
IN
no! bUoo
111. *,+**
112. b.623
112. b.b32
.117* 	 b.4.9.b.. .
117. 5.415
115. 5.449
107. b.b27
104. b.b33
	 116. .. . b«.MB4. .
115. 5.619
113. 5.44b
114, S^SfcS
105. b.59b
107. b.ibl
108* b!?13
109. b.S4b
110. S,S«t.
110. 5.494
109. b.376
. ikfl.. i.SJltt
24. 24.
loo. joy.
104. b.376
121. b.713
4. .079
4. 1.434
AFb 1900
t
OUT
.387
.357
000000
000000
080000
•00000
000000
.415
.259
.319
.301
.317
.250
.210
.275
.341
14.
.211
.<4lb
0*00110
EFF
93.2
93.6
95 1 "
00000
00000. ... 	 - . . . . . -. .... 	 	 	 	
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
92.4
95.4
94.3
94.6
94.5
95.5
96.0
94.9
93.6
14.
58-
92.381
96.196
000000
000*00
000000
kL EFICIENCY USING
OUT
..1
IS DEFINED AS:
• C no w 11 A V C llcfft
» i vn n v " • v VV«M


~
• — --
A
2
3
4
7
1O
12
13
14
19
18
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
23
28
27
28
JO
31
32
33
34
39
36
37
38
4O
41
42
43
44
43
48
47
48
48
SO
91
83
34
33
98
37
38
88
80
8t
82
83
87
88
7O
71
72
73
74
73

-------
DAILY SUMMARY OF RESULTS
j
LOCATION! R1CKENBACKER AFtJ 19oO
DATE: 2-ii-ao
TIME LOAD E t
IN OUT
0 116. 5.480 .417
100 114. 5.463 .362
200 ||3» «>T557 . *(«>
300 114. 5.450 .337
400 116. 5.510 .439
_ 	 	 5y.O 	 121 ._ 5.43S . .H85.
600 119. 5.506 .479
700 110. 5.S39 .398
ADO >21T ST«TD . *OS
900 119. 5.457 .3B2
1000 116. 5.532 .355
..... .11Q.O._ UP. *._437 .«i<|
1 1200 120. 5.152 .447
i 1300 120. 5.278 .446
1400 122. 5-205 Ti*l
1500 120. 5.271 .412
1600 105. 5.186 .414
. . > 17QO _ 	 104. 	 5..56Q .459
1 1800 101. 5.226 .541
" 1900 99. 5.353 .530
2000 102. 5.393 .525
2100 103. 5.390 .529
2200 103. 5.37b .553
1'OQ- 	 10g._ .i*18j, .5.23
» AVERAGES 24. 24. 24.
rX OF DATA 100. 100. 10O, \
MINIMUM 99. 5.152 .315
MAXIMUM 122. 5.557 .553
L_ MEAN 	 11?. .. .Su389 .4.J9.
STD.DEV. 8. .120 .069
X STD.OEV. 7. 2,224 15.693
24-MOUR REMOVAL EFICIENCY USING
1
. (MEAN] t , £ : 91. 0.46.X.
1 IN OUT
v i .. . .
NOTE! IMEAN] IS DEFINED AS:
X
THE MEAN pOR x P.AYS USING Y-HUUR


EFF
92. a
93.4
94TJ
93.8
92.0
91.1
91.3
92.8
9P,M
93.0
93.6
92.4
91.3
91.5
«2Tfc
92.2
92.0
91.4
89.6
90.1
.90-1 	
90.2
09.7
VQ,. 1
oo_I 	 '.:.••
89.647
94.328
91.B3b
1.349
1.469





,x



18
21
23
24
29
2<
27
28
JO
31
32
33
34
30
30
37
38
4O
41
42
43
44
49
4.
47
48
49
9O
91
84
99
98
37
08
89
80
61
82
83
64
es
88
87
«8
70
71
72
73
74
79
'V

-------
Si"
4
a
7
•
to
1 1
13
14
It
!•
IT
II
10
20
21
23
2*
26
24
29
3U
31
J3
34
33
30
37
ja
JO
40
4 1
*42
«• J
•Itt
'*7
«O
57
DAILY SUMMARY OF RESULTS
LOCATIONS NICKENBACKEH AFB i9o
DATES 2-12-80
TIME
0
100
300
400
	 	 500 . ......
600
700
Aon
900
1000
... . . ..110.0
1200
1300
t«oo
1500
1600
> 1700
U> >s<>0
U> 1900
2100
2200
* AVERAGES
t Of DATA
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MEAN
STO.OEV.
X 3TO.DEV.
LOAD E E
IN OUT
111. 5.173 .424
111. 5.134 .381
111. 5.267 .430
111. 5.262 .300
117^" sll22 I 205
117. 5.344 .221
123. 5.215 .196
123. 5.201 .220
.. l«l2.-_. S.lflU .J10
123. 5.222 .344
123. 5.182 .291
M*. 5.0'? .1*7
109. 5.056 .220
99. 4.962 .259
. 100. 	 b.UBU 	 .203
103. 5.106 .283
102. 5.106 .297
IO7. 3.]A| ,j<>4
108. 5.150 .266
108. 4.959 .342
2«. 24. 24.
100. too. IPO. i
99. 4.959 .187
123. 5.344 .430
112. 5.159 ,.280
7. .094 .073
7. 1.622 25.300

0
EFF
91.8
92.6
91.8
94.1
95.5
96.0
95.9
95 9
96.2
95.6
94.0
93.4
94.4
95.5
94.8
•ib.O
94.5
94.2
44.1
94.8
93.1
93.9
24.
91.001
96.314
94.417
1.397
1.480
24-HOUR REMOVAL EFICIENCV USING
1
IMEANJ E , E ? 94.
-------
DAILY  SUMMARY OF RESULTS
LOCATION: RICKENBACKEH AFB i9eo
OATEI 2-i3-eo
TIME LOAD E E
IN OUT
0 106. 5.004 .274
100 106. 5.195 .169
200 106, «,07« ,P1P
300 106. 5.027 .147
400 112. 5.096 000000
... . 550 	 112. i.e2o gggggg
600 112. 4.429 000000
700 112. 4.666 «*«•**
•00 11. S.uTa MmMuMm
900 18. 5.076 000000
1000 16. 5.198 .354
1200 14^ 5!335 !s67
i 1300 120. 5.317 .391
! 1400 118,. S^33« ,S1«
1500 110. 5.407 .302
1600 106. 5.166 .226
> .1700 [ _ IQ3. 5.l7u .22**
' 1»66 109. 5.355 .246
!£ 1900 112. *00000 ******
2000 US. S.521 T4IT8
2100 110. 5.469 .271
2200 111. 5.475 .269
2300 110. 5.556 .261
* AVERAGES 24. 23. 17.
X OF DAT* 100. 9fc. 7lT
MINIMUM 103. 3.tt2b .147
MAXIMUM 120. 5.556 .476
	 MEAN 	 _ 	 J1U 5. J 26. .••*».«»...
STD.DEV. 4. .366 «»«*«*
X STD.DEV. 4. 7.925 »<«*«»
24-HOUR REMOVAL EFICIENCY USING
1
_. 	 [MEAN!. I , E 	 : «0«f»ffi
1 IN OUT
NOTE: (MEANl IS DEFINED AS:
X
	 THE MEAN f.QR X.D.A.YS y SING T-HUUH

EFF
94.5
96.4
97.1
• 000*
0000*
93.2
92.7
92.7
U7
94.4
95.7
95.6
95.4
95.0
94.7
95.3
17.
91.340
97.069
000000





-




20
21
22
23
24
23
28
27
28
a»
30
31
32
33
34
33
Ml
37
38
39
4O
41
42
43
44
4B
48
47
48
48
30
Bl
83
84
39
B8
37
88
SB
8O
81
82
83
A«
05
88
87
88
70
71
72
73
74
78

-------
I
2
3
4
9
•
7
a
a
to
1 1
12
13
14
ia
10
17
IB
19
2O
21
22
21
24
29
i6
27
2«
29
3O
31
32
13
34
33
36
37
38
39
4O
41
42
43
44
45
40
47
4U
40
5s»
91
92
53
34
55
9«
?'
DAILY SUMMARY OF RESULTS

LOCATION! R1CKENBACKER *Fb I960
DATE« 2-J4-80
TIME
0
100
9no
300
400
	 	 5UO 	
600
700
• nn
900
1000
	 1100 	
1200
1500
1400
1SOO
1600
_ ..> 1?«0 .
' 1800
Ul 1*00
2000
2100
2200
2300
» AVERAGES
X OF DATA
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MEAN.
STO.DEV.
X STO.OEV.
24-HOUR REMOVA
1
LMEJkNl E ,.
1 IN
t
NOTEI (MEANJ
X
ThE ME.AN

LOAD E E
IN OUT
106. 5.M« .241
106. 5.S3J .194
tQfc 9 «•« ISfr
106. b.444 .173
112. b.«4l«J .^>00
112^. 5..5«9 ,iJi
24. 24. 24.
100. 100. lOu,
97. 5.206 .097
118. 5.712 .624
-LOJ>^ _5..«»JS .£19
4. .114 .110
4. 2.103 50. 206
L EFICIENCV USING
E « 95tS6«
OUT
l
IS DEFINED AS:
E.Qk_x e*TS USING T-Hyi

EFF
95.6
96.5
97 i
96. a
96.3
S5.5
96.3
97.5
9fr 7
97.0
96.1
95.7
96.8
96.0
Q*.t
95.9
97.2
97.9
97.8
98.2
OS.O
68.6
92.4
95.1
24.
J.OO. ' '
80.612
9
-------
DAILY
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
LOCATION: RICKENBACKER AFB 1950
DATES 2-15-80
TIME
0
too
200
1 300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
)100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
	 > 1700 ...
1 1800
™ 190°
w 2000
2100
2200
2300
* AVERAGES
I OF DATA
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
	 ME AJI . ._ 	
STD.DEV.
X 8TO.OEV.
24-HOUR REMOV
1
(MEANJ £ ,
1 IN
If
NOTES (MEAN]
X
1 THE MtA
LOAD t t tFF
IN OUT
103. 5.446 .176 96.8
103. 5.496 .105 98.1
103. S.S42 M«»»« #**.*•
103. 5.377 *0*000 0*0«0
103. 5.407 «0*0*0 0000*
103. 5.206 ,027 <*<».5
103. 5.278 .399 92.4
103. 5.657 .470 91.7
117. 5.427 T4T5 91.2
117. 5.59* .713 87.3
106. ****** »0*00* »0*0«
108. b.456 .6l«> 08.8
105. 5.720 .493 91.4
106. 5.855 .697 88.1
106. 5.874 .840 a5, 7
106. 5.976 .467 92.2
93. 6.016 .338 94.4
100. 5.848 »»0000 0000*
99. 5.809 *0»**» *****
97. 6.020 »•*»*» **0«*
99. 5.874 •**«*« •«*««
101. 5.831 ••***« **«00
100. 5.937 ****** *»**«
96. 5.946 ****0* 00*0*
24. 23. 13. 13.
100. 96,. 54, S4.
93. 5.206 .027 85.701
117. 6.020 .840 99.474
193. 5.678 •«.«*** 00*0**
5. .253 «*»»«* »00»**
5. 4,463 •««•«« «»*»«*
AL EFICIENCV USING
OUT
i
IS DEFINEU AS:
N FP* x UAYS USING Y-HUUK AVL^AGts 	 	

,v



20
21
22
21
24
23
26
27
2B
JO
11
12
11
14
16
36
17
la
se
40
41
42
41
44
49
46
47
48
4»
3O
91
92
93
S4
99
96
37
38
00
6O
61
62
63
bS
66
66
69
70
71
72
73
74
79
'V

-------
DAILY  SUMMARY  OF  RESULTS
LOCATION! RICKENBACKEH AFB 1900
DATES 2-16-80
TIME
	 o
100
2AA
300
400
	 50Q_ ...
600
700
ADO
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1SOO
1600
	 > .17U.OL 	 	
1 1800
13 1900
2000
2100
2200
2300 	 	
0 AVERAGES
	 x or a A i A 	 	
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
	 	 MEAN. . 	
STD.DEV.
X STD.OEV.
24-HOUR REMOVAL
1
[MEAN] £ > E
1 IN
:
L - T
LOAD
99.
99.
««.
99.
99.
99!
99.
1 1 a.
114.
110.
110.
121.
121.
1 19.
117.
97.
96.
101.
105.
108.
108.
24.
_iuiu
96.
121.
8.
8.
E
IN
5. 56V
5.857
«.««4
5.880
5.073
5^651
5.706
s,*.Ta
5. 643
5.64<>
. 5.72B
5.643
5.715
*>,h»7
5.575
5.651
.... 5.72V
5.491
5.547
s.alo
5.681
5.470
24.
_lfttt. 	
4.974
5.894
.196 ~
3.469
E
OUT
000000
000000
000000
000*00
000000
000000
090000
000000
000000
.729
.005
.750
.718
.591
.460
.470
.579
9.
.416
.005
000000
000000
EFF
00000
000*0
00000
00000
00000
000**
0B0B0
00000
00000
06.9
85.8
06.9
89.3
91.8
91.4
ttfl.4
9.
-38. 	 	
85.756
0SSSS9
000000
000000
EFICIENCV USING
• *s*9*»X
OUT
l
I NOTES (MEAN] IS UEF
X
T«E MEAN FQH x
•
•

INEU AS:
DAYS usjr


-------
DAILY SUMMARY OK RESULTS
LOCATION! RICKENBACKEH AFB i960
DATE! 2-17-80
TIME LOAD t E
IN OUT
0 116. 5.701 ,7a7
100 129. 5.648 .614
POO |P2. S.fcAl TS«h
300 121. 5.706 .513
400 121. 5.660 .516
_ . 500 	 118. . i.531 ..IBb
600 116. 5.657 .531
700 114. 5.675 .408
ADO 11«. Srfcl7 -aSS
400 114. 5.610 .514
1000 116. 5.591 .430
MOO . 11«.. .5.601 .. .451
1200 115. 5.776 .41S
1300 109. 5.892 .298
1400 IIOT Sr77fc rflflP
1500 122. 5.181 .449
1600 99. 5.391 .268
	 > 1700.. 	 _ 1 01 ....... 5. 7 15 .. ....2B9, .
U, 1«00 103. 5.654 .341
00 1900 103. 5.755 .382
2000 106- 5-fcSO -59^
2100 106. 5.802 .383
2200 107. 5.733 .420
	 2300 107. 5.693 M««*0
« AVERA6ES 24. 24. 23.
X OF DATA 100. 100. «fc.
MINIMUM 99. 5.181 .268
MAXIMUM 129. 5.892 .747
_ . -MEAN 	 	 	 113.. .V.65J _ ..^4J|«f
3TO.DEV. 6. .141 .110
I 8TO.DEV. 7. 2.4J7 24,*««
24-HOUR REMOVAL EFICIENCY USIN6
1
.. CMEANJ E , F I.92.U56X
1 IN OUT
NOTE! (MEAN] IS DEFINED AS:
X
THE MEAN F0« X UAYS USING *-HUU«
_
EFF
86.9
09.1
89.7
91.0
90.9
91.2
90.6
92.8
9J^9
90.8
92.3
91.9
92.8
94.9
92 ,i
91.3
95.0
94.9
94.0
93.4
93,0
93.4
92.7
«0ft«ff
23.
96^ " "
86.891
95.026
92.048
1.948
2.116


AVtMGtS 	 _...


i ^



20
21
22
23
24
23
20
27
26
X*
10
31
32
33
M
38
30
37
38
3*
4O
41
42
43
44
49
4«
47
48
•
O
1
2
3
84
93
96
S7
98
9>
flO
81
82
63
P. 4
A3
ea
67
88
8B
7O
71
72
73
74
79
V

-------
DAILY SUMMARY OF RESULTS
J
* LOCATION: RICKENBACKEM AFb I9»o
2 OATEI 2-18-80
TIME LOAD f. E
° IN OUT
7 0 115. 5.683 »***tt*
• too 126. s.m «»«•*«
* *nn 12* f,*-*f 507
10 300 123. 5.767 .480
" aOO 121. 5.693 .453
11 50ft 121. 5«63b. .«0 .315
! ..1100... 119«_. b.<»3b ..JOB
1200 120. 5.486 .280
1300 US. 5.458 .275
|400 tit. S,"| ,"«»
" 1500 117. 5.551 .231
" 1600 100. 5.551 .180
" 	 > 1700 _ 	 IU1.. 	 5,537.. .16B
" ^ 1800 100. 5.732 .159
" vD t900 78. 6.112 .172
27 2000 «TT S.fcOT ,\1*
" 2100 100. 5.591 .152
" 2200 100. 5.512 .124
10 ... 2300 	 	 10.0.. 5»«ft_ .151
31
" * AVERAGES 24. 24. 22.
" X OF DATA 100. 100. «4.
" MINIMUM 78. 5.435 .124
" MAXIMUM 126. b.112 .507
MEAN 112. 5,j>2« ,i9b
37 3TD.DEV. 12. .148 .124
" X 3TD.OEV. 11. 2.627 41.954
jw
" 24-HOUR REMOVAL EFICIENCT USING
i
IMEAN] E , E ? 94.75iX
1 IN OUT
44
•* 	 Y . .'.... _ . _...
'* NOTE: (MEAN) IS DEFINED AS:
"! x
40 THE MfcAN FOH X 1>AYS USING Y-HUUK
•1»
>•«
tl .
tFF
*»««*
*»»»»
91 0
91.5
92.0
12.8
92.4
92.6
95,0
93.7
94.3
<*4.3. 	 	 .
94.7
95.0
Q^.A
95.8
96.7
97.0 _.
•>7.2
97.2
«fc.
-------
DAILY SUMMAHY OF RESULTS
LOCATION: RICKENBACKEN AFB i960
OATEI 2-19-80
TIME LOAD t E
IN OUT
0 103. 5.529 .131
100 103. 5.514 .140
200 IO5. S.SQ* . | flS
300 103. 5.557 .162
400 103. 5.625 .<>0d
50.0 _ 1V3. 5^i9V . ..17M
600 103. 5.732 .180
700 103. 5.689 .146
•00 104, S-fcflh Tla*
900 104. 5.694 .114
1000 109. 5.58.1700... 	 	 77, _ 5.496 .fell
1 1600 76. 5.507 .574
g 1900 72. 5.389 .432
2000 75. 5.492 .4*7
2100 78. 5.430 .500
2200 64. 4.900 .656
2300 85^ 5..481 ,6£i
« AVERAGES 24. 24. 24.
X QF DATA 100. 10U. 100. 1
MINIMUM 72. 4.900 .112
MAXIMUM 109. 5.966 .656
r HIAI* -.93a.. _.S,56i - ..2.95.
9TO.OEV. 12. .190 .196
X STO.OEV. 13. 3.408 66.415
24-HOUR REMOVAL EFICIENCY USING
1
JMEANJ E i 6 « 94J05?
1 IN OUT
NOTE> (MEAN! IS DEFINED A3:
X
	 	 Die. MEAN PCJR .JL.U.AYS USIMG T-HUUK
- --
tFF
97.6
97.3
97.4
97.1
96.4
96.7
97.4
97.4
98.0
97.1
95.9
97.0
97.3
97.9
96.0
90.1
08.7
69.6
92.0
91 ^1_
90.6
06.6
06.6
24.
86.615
90.034
94.t>23
3.732
3.944






i



20
21
22
23
24
29
26
27
ia
ta
JO
31
32
33
34
33
36
37
36
39
4O
41
2
3
4
8
6
7
a
46
9O
91
32
83
•4
89
86
37
aa
8B
60
61
62
63
A4
63
66
67
66
6»
70
71
72
73
74
78

-------
,
)
4
a
"7
a
g
IO
1 1
12
14
15
10
17
,.
*
'
21
22
23
2*
29
27
28
2b
JO
J1
32
33
34
3ft
30
37
36
J»
4O
41
42
43
«4
4«
47
4ft
,0
91
92
94
9S
5ft
97
DAILY SUMMAKY OF NESULTS

LOCATION: RICKENBACKEH AFB 1900
OATEI 2-20-80
TIME
0
100
300
400
	 500 .....
bOO
700
MAO
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
IflOO
1500
IbOO
> 1700 	
1 1800
£ 1900
M 2000
2100
2200
£300
« AVERAGES
I OF DATA
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
	 MEAN. 	 „ .
STD.OEV.
X 9TO.OEV.
LOAD t E
IN OUT
87. b.37b .646
87. 5.276 .588
87. b.b89 .449
87. b.b50 .41b
92.. b.i27 .445
92. 5.584 .468
92. 5.b2U .439
Q1. •>.*!! ."51
100. 5.679 .451
103. 5.b83 .378
lab. b.fllb . . J2B
103. •*«»*• .327
101. *•«*«« .521
104. *»*•»• .626
108. •**»»• .547
..1U3L .889888 . .194
97. »H»»»» .184
97. ••«•*• .22b
100. ****** .23b
98. ••••»• .547

-------
DAILY SUMMAKV OF KESULTS
LUCATIONI RICKENBACKER
DATE: 2-21-80
TIME
0
100
200
300
400
.500
600
700
aoo
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
| 1400
1500
1600
> (700
I 1800
N) 1900
2000
2100
2200
2300
* AVEHA6E8
X OF DAT*
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MEAN
STD.OEV.
X STD.OEV.
LOAD E
IN
74. 000***
74. 000000
79. 000000
ao. 00000*
85. 000000
as. *»*«**«
««. 000000
97. 000000
107. 4.609
107... 	 5.183
106. 5.162
98. 4.976
93. 4.944
89. 000000
104. 5.307
!VP, 	 5.250
100. 5.250
100. 5.353
97. ST«fcP
100. 5.286
96. 5.230
._.£!.„ 5.250
24. 13.
100. 54.
23. 4.609
107. 5.353
(t9t 000000
18. 000000
20. M«*00
AFb 1980
t
OUT
.397
.496
.686
.587
.416
.419
•00*0*
.669
.68U
.457
.247
.225.
.325
!2
-------
         DAILY SUMMAHY OF  KESULtS
         LOCATION: RICKENBACKEH AFb i9ttu
         OATEI  2-22-60
    TIME
LOAD
                          IN
       0
     100
  21.
  66.
       5.266
                                 OUT

                                 .326
                                 ,304
                                 1 «no
                        EFF
  93.6
  94.2
  an <
     300
     400
    .SOD
     600
     700
     lion
  92.
  92.
  92.
  92.
  92.
       5.364
       5.4io
       5.71*
       5.467
       5. 255
                                 .307
                                 .312
                                — 303
                                 .121
                                 .190
  94.3
  94.2
  94.7
  97.e
  96.4
  Qfc.ft
    900
   1000
  ..ILttft.
   1200
   1300
   1400
 97.
 94.
 9.4..
 94.
 97.
 97 T
       000000
       000000
       000000
                                  .196
                                000000
                                00080*.
                                000000
                                *•*•*•
                         96.4
                        00000
   1500
   1600
>  17QO..
00  1^00
 93.
 63.
..64a
 B5.
 66.
       00000m
        b.469
                                000000
                                  .185
        5.515
        5.614
                                  .195
                                  .310
 00000
 00000
-JU00J	
 00000
  96.6

  96!s
  94.3
    2100          66.  000000   000000  00000
    2200          69.  000000   000000  00000
....  2.?00	  	89, ...00J»000... 0»00J0.  0000ft.

 0 AVERAGES       24.  15.      IS.     15.
_X OF DAT*	100.  63.      63.    _63.
 MINIMUM          21.    5.255     .121  93.014
 MAXIMUM          97.    5.715     .384  97.776

 3TD.DEV.         15.  000000   000000  000000
 I 9TO.DEV.       17.  000000   000000  000000

 24-HOUR REMOVAL EFICIENCY  USIN6
        1
 JMEANJ   I  i E    ._.:.    .000?
        1  IN   OUT

	JL		!.._...,		_. ..
 NOTE! (MEANI  IS DEFINED A3:
             X
       THE MEAN FOK X DATS  USING Y-t
 9
 •
 7
_ •_
 •
 10
 II
. <_2
 II
 14
 !•
 !•
                                                                                                                                            39

                                                                                                                                            37
                                                                                                                            38
                                                                                                                            4O
                                                                                                                            42
                                                                                                                            43
                                                                                                                            91
                                                                                                                            92
                                                                                                                                            87
                                                                                                                                            00
                                                                                                                                            70
                                                                                                                                            71

-------
DAILY SUMMARY OF RESULTS
LOCATION! R1CKEN8ACKEH AFb 1980
DATE: 2-23-so
TIME
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
> 1700
' 1800
£ 1900
2000
2100
2200
2300
* AVERAGES
X OF OA1A
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
... - "E*M .
STO.DEV.
X STD.DEV.
24-HOUR REMOVA
1
IMEANI E ,
1 IN
.. Y
NOTES IMEANJ
X
THE *fc*N
LOAD E E EFF
IN OUT
66. «000«0 •••000 «0000
66. »»»»*» 00*000 00000
fib, 0*0000 Mmmmmrn HIM MM
86. 000000 000000 00000
66. *0«000 *0*000 00000
86. 0*0«00 *0«ff00 00*00
86. 0*0000 000000 00000
86. »0*000 000000 00000
98. 000000 000000 00000
100. 000000 000000 00000
97. 000000 000000 00000
.97. 000000 000000 00000
97. »000»0 «00000 00000
100. *000»0 000000 00000
103. >0«000 000000 0000fl
96. b.360 .316 94.1
83. S.467 .281 94.9
*4. b,572 ,«72 9J.5
85. 5.646 .155 97.3
86. »0«0«0 «00«00 00000
87. 000000 000000 00000
68. 000000 000000 00000
67. 000000 000000 0000*
ft9. 00«0»0 »«0000 *«»ff*
24. 4. 4. 4.
100. 17T I7r I7T • •
63. b.368 .155 91.524
103. 5.646 .472 97.262
90. 000000 *««000 000000
6. 0*0««» *0000« 00«0«0
7. *0««*0 *0|l»«« 000000
L EFICIENCV USIN6
E : ,0001
OUT
i
IS DEFINED AS:
FOH X KAVS USING Y-HOIIK AVt^AGtS
I
i
i
a
«
•
•
7
•
•
10
ta
u
14
IB
It
17
I*
IB
20
21
22
23
24
U
26
27
28
n
so
31
32
33
34
30
38
37
3.
M
4O
41
42
43
44
49
4«
47
a
•
o
i
2
3
B4
99
9«
97
3«
oe
6O
61
62
63
ft 4
6S
eo
67
ftfi
eo
7O
71
72
3
4
9

-------
DAILY SUMMARY OF KESULTS
/Y
2
3
4
9
7
0
0
to
11
12
13
14
16
10
17
10
19
2O
21
22
23
24
2S
it
20
30
Jt
32
34
39
37
JO
4O
41
42
43
44
47
40
E
9ft
Sti
57
LOCATION: RICKENBACKEH AFb i9eo
DATE: 2-24-ao
TIME
" 0
100
200
300
400
	 5UO
600
700
• 00
900
1000
1200
1300
I«OO
1500
1600
.... > .1700..... 	
1 1800
£ 1900
2000
2100
2200
2300
• AVERAGES
X Of DAIA
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
	 MEAH 	
' STO.OEV.
X STO.OEV.
24-HOUR REMOVAL
1
(MEANJ £ , E
1 IN
y
LOAD t k
IN OUT
102. «**•»• ••**«*
102. **«»»• »«*000
IDA. MMMMMM MMMMMM
102. ****** ******
107. 0000*0 000000
106. ****** *0»000
100. »•••*» «*««»»
«*., MMMMMM MMMMMM
102. ***«»* »0»*0«
107. »»**•* 000000
115. ****** »»«**•
US. «*««** «***0*
99. 5.524 .446
84. 5.406 .389
8st" 5^191 ^283
87. 5.349 .359
89. 5.619 .347
87. 5.464 .318
24. 9. 9.
100. 3ft., S«T
83. 5.191 .283
115. 5.736 .446
10. «««»»• ******
10. *»••*• •»•*«•
EFICIENCV USING
? 	 .OQg*
OUT
i
NOTE! IMEAN) IS DEFINED AS:
X
	 THE MtAN f OK A DAYS ..USING T-HUU



tFF
0000*
«0**«
0000*
00000
000*0
0000*
*****
• MHO*
00000
*****
00000
00*0*
»0*»*
91 .9
92.8
93. fl
94.5
93.3
93.8
94.2
93.2
9.
3H.
91.919
94.544
000000
*«»*«»
******


K AVERAGtS



a
3
4
B
7
9
to
II
12
1*
14
IB
17
ia
IB
20
21
22
23
24
29
20
27
20
2>
JO
31
32
3J
34
33
37
M
4O
41
42
43
44
45
4«
47
40
4»
50
Bl
52
63
64
55
50
57
0B
88
0O
61
02
63
69
60
87
60
09
70
71
72
73
74
7B
V

-------
DAILY SUMHAHV  OF KESULTS
LOCATIONS RICHENBACKEH AFB 1900
DATE: 2-25-ao
TIME
0
100
200
300
400
... . 	 50.0 	
600
TOO
BOO
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
	 	 > ...7 0.0. 	 	
i iaoo
£ |90°
<" 200A
2100
2200
	 2Jj>0 	 	
« AVERAGES
1 OF OATA
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
,..— . -"fc»J« . 	 -
STO.DEV.
X 8TD.OEV.
24-HOUR REMOVAL
1
iMfANJ fc , E
1 IN
i_ y_
LOAD E E
IN OUT
104. 5.734 .353
102. 5.794 .339
102T 5-l«7 T50. *««»»* *»»**>?
116. *•**«* •***«*
106. *««••« »««•*»
106. *.?«! .lai
111. 5.605 .376
01. 5.577 .163
..fl.3.._. . S..J»8J ,32S
83. 5.626 .372
86. 5.590 .224
A6. %.«•! ,as«
85. 5.401 ,4bb
05. b.423 .490
_.4?j.. -.5^fe2_ -*5JI1
24. 15. 15.
100. fcl- fcl.
61. 5.300 .141
116. 5.794 .541
100. ffl*M9 9*9S»»
11. «***«0 «•««««
12. *•«*«« «»«»««
EFICIENCV USING
• tUOuZ
OUT
1
NOTE: CMEANJ is DEFINED AS:
»
THE MEAN FOR x u«ts USING Y-HUUM
EFF
93.8
94.1
oa.fl
94.2
93.3
an an a
*«»*«
«««*«
«•««•
*•»•«
«aaa»
«»»»•
««»•«
• •»••
93.3
91.3
94.3
93.4
96.0
91.6
91.4
90.0
90.J
15.
61^
90.097
97.545
•0*000
«*«»«•
••*«*« .


AVtRAGtS
	
i ^
a
*
4
•
•
7
•
•
to
II
12
11
14
IB
ia
IT
i*
i»
to
21
22
23
24
29
2>
27
!•
!•
JO
31
32
33
34
39
36
37
38
3*
4O
41
42
43
44
49
4>
47
48
4B
9O
91
12
B3
M
99
90
»7
98
B»
00
ei
92
03
69
60
67
60
6B
7O
71
72
73
74
79
V

-------
*

,J
• 4
22
21
24
25
2ft
27
«
/•
30
31
32
33
34
13
le
31
3O
3»
40
41
42
43
44
43
40
47
4U
4B
30
31
32
33
34
sa
3fl
37
DAILY SUMMAUV OF KESULTS

LUCATIONI RICKENBACKEK AFB 1980
DATES 2-26-80
TIME
0
too
pan
300
400
	 500
600
700
•an
900
1000
1100 .
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
> 1700
' 1800
5 noo
2000
2100
2200
2.300
• AVERAGES
X OF OAIA
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MEAJt 	
STD.OEV.
X 3TO.OEV.
LOAD E i
IN
98. 5.263
98. 5.694
°". 547f? '
96. 000000
98. *00»»a
. 1U4. OttfttO
104. «*«*«*
104. *»*««•
f, •••f«^i
118. •••••0
122. b.bb9
129. . b.t»7«» .
115. b.557
114. 5.706
»!«>. *.**'
121. b.530
105. 5.420
1U2L i.bOO
102. 5.369
104. 5.418
107T STa55
108. 5.469
102. 5.377
113, 5.385
24. 17. 24
100. 71. 10U
98. 5.263
129. 5.730
108, *0B0»»
9. •«•»»•
9. «*«««* 2b
OUT
.61S
.617
• %40
.733
.425
.589
.559
.728
.821
.877
.953
.017
.546
.309
.339
.441
.435
.57t»
.564
.663
.642-
.576
.774
.910
•
.109
.•*53
.629
.167
.560
Iff
86.2
69. 2
8A ft
Hunan
aoaof
aaaaa
00*00
00000
00000
00000
B3.2
H5.6
90.2
94.6
9?. 7
92.0
92.0
89. 5
89.5
87.8
67.9
89.5
85.6
84.6
17.
71. :_...:
83.195
94.576
000000
000000
000000
24-HOUR REMOVAL EFICIENCY USING
1
(MEAN) £ , E : 000000X
1 IN
1
NOTE! (MEAN1
X
THE MEAN


OUT
i
IS DEFINED AS:
fUK X QATS UblNG



T-HUUK


AVtHȣ|iS



J
a
3



2fl
27
2«
29
JO
31
32
33
34
33
30
17
10
9>
40
41
41
43
44
40
4fl
47
48
4B
DO
Bl
92
S3
04
M
00
B7
91
»
eo
61
02
•3
O3
M
07
oa
•»
7O
71
72
73
74
7B
~>t

-------
DAILY SUMMAKY OF KESULTS

LOCATION! RICKEN8ACKEH AFU 1900
OATEJ 2-27-60
TIME LOAD E t
IN OUT
0 116. 5.274 .917
100 116. 5.397 .740
200 11*.. •S.ll" .«•#?
300 116. 5.250 .469
400 122. 5.2B2 .194
	 500 	 122. S.U5i .294
600 122. 5.566 .501
700 122. 5.412 .492
600 115T S.1A1 taan
900 124. -J.J20 .b56
1000 124. 000000 000000
	 .|I»Q.._. 	 124.. 000/J00 f«0ffffff
1200 125. 5.170 .250
1300 120. 5.292 .431
1500 129. 5.106 .667
1600 125. 5.111 .467
•f J700 .. 132. 	 b.106 .451
^ 1«00 120. 5.016 .279
CD 1^00 111. 5.124 .271
2000 111. 5.145 .315
2100 111. 5.324 .290
2200 114. b.523 .510
2300 114, 5.50U .ttStt
EFF
06.1
90.6
90.7
96.3
94.2
91.0
90.9
09.5
00000
«»#»#
95.2
91.9
66.9
90.9
91.2
94.4
94.7
93.9
94.6
90.8
04.4
0 AVERAGES 24. 22. 22. 22.
I OF DATA 100. «.?. 92, 92.
MINIMUM 111. 5.016 .194
MAXIMUM 132. 5.566 .917
MEAN 12.0. 5,25* ^4.77.
3TO.DEV. 6. .165 .193
I 8TO.DEV. 5. 3.143 40.429
24-HOUR REMOVAL EFICIENCY USING
1
(M.EANj Erf • ^Ut9i^)(
1 IN OUT
. _ 	 	 	 t. .. . ' .
NUTEi (MEAN] IS DEFINED AS:
X
THE Mt*N HIM x I>AYS U^ING Y-HUU*

62.614
96.329
3.569
3.925


~


,\
a
3
4
B
7
IO
II
IS
14
IB
IB
17
<•
21
23
24
23
27
28
a>
JO
31
32
33
M
38
M
37
36
SO
40
41
42
43
44
4B
4B
47
48
4B
BO
at
B4
9B
SB
57
08
SB
BO
61
B2
03
r.4
65
6B
07
ea
B9
70
71
72
73
74
79

-------
DAILY SUMMAMY OF RESULTS


LOCATION: RICKENBACKEK AFU t9«o
DATE: 2-20-80
TIME LOAD E E
IN OUT
0 108. 5.297 .516
100 106. 5.062 .452
9OO 10*. *.fl*A ,M«
300 106. 5.27t> .383
400 106. 5.409 ,<461
..500 	 115^. i.164 ....379
600 115. 4.976 .372
700 US. 5.313 .482
•oo If. *»1'5 ,*5#
900 127. 5.202 .470
1000 127. 5.467 .417
. 1100. 	 12J. 5.19H .307
1200 123. 5.324 .334
1300 123. 5.417 .314
1*00 l|fc. ftT9QS .Pfcfc
1500 116. 5.043 .349
1600 96. 5.163 .437
1 1000 115. 5.360 .657
vD 1*00 110. 5.315 .652
2000 110. 5-19fc ,fc!9
2100 114. b.59b .569
2200 119. 5.585 .612
» AVERAGES 24. 24. 24.
X OF DATA 100,. 100. 100, 1
| MINIMUM 96. 4.904 .266
MAXIMUM 127. 5.650 .657
STD.DEV. 7. .200 .117
X STD.DEV. 6. 3.79u 25.037
24-HOUR REMOVAL EFICIENCV USING
1
(MEANJ E > E ? 9U179J
! 1 IN OUT
v '
NOTE: (MEAN) IS DEFINED AS:
X
THE MEAN FOR X DATS USING Y-HUUK
.
J-
1
ll
L .. 	 	 ._
EFF
90.3
91.1
««.S
92.7
91.5
92T7
92.5
90.9
91.1
91.0
92.4
94.1
93.7
94.2
Qfl.T
93.1
91.6
90.3
67.8
87.7
tta.l
89.8
89.0
89.5
24.
87.729
94.682
2.036
2.235


™


2
j
4
»
•
7
•
•
ID
II
12
IS
14
IB
!•
17
IB
19
2O
21
aa
23
24
23
26
27
28
2»
90
32
39
36
J7
M
M
40
41
42
43
44
45
4C
47
5O
91
63
06
97
9«
80
6O
61
62
63
A4
63
O«
67
ea
69
70
71
72
3
4
9
y

-------
DAILY SUMMAHY OF RESULTS
LOCATION: RICKENBACKER AFB i9eo
DATE: 2-29-eo
TIME
0
100
300
400
500
600
700
600
900
1000
1100
1200
| 1300
I 1400
1500
1600
> 1700
1 1600
£ 1900
2000
2100
2200
2300
* AVERAGES
X OF DATA
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
ME AM
3TO.OEV.
X 8TO.DEV.
LOAD
98.
98.
90.
98.
98.
98.
98.
118.
132.
126*
120.
120,.
120.
109.
113.-
112.
118.
116.
122.
120.
24.
100T
98.
132.
uT
10.
E E
IN OUT
5.7lY ".657
5.361 .442
5.361 .4PU
5.575
5.574
5!361 !
S.074
5,359
5.203
5.394
5)405 !
5.382 .
5.390 -
5.282
5.152
"5l277 \
5.282 .
S.Sifc .
5.30tt
5.385
5.5«1 f
24. 24.
100. 100.
5.074
5.719
!l53~ 	 I
2.646 20.
528
399
398
346
320
354
517
605
590
581
562
597
450
561
602
561
563
\
320
657
106
756
EF
88
91
92
90
92
93
93
93
91
90
08
OH
09
89
HA
91
91
92
89
88
A7
89
09
88
24.
00*
87.
93.
90.
1.
2.
24-HOUR REMOVAL EF1CIENCV USING
, 1 IN OUT
NOTE! (MEAN)
X
: THE MfcAN
1
t
IS DEFINED AS:
FQK X ()AY5 USIiYG Y


-HOUK



F
.5
.8
.4
.5
.8
.0
.6
.7
,.4 	 	 . . 	 	
.1
.8
.8
.2
.6
,9
.5
.9
.0
.4
.6
.4
.5
.2

006
696
916
116


AVERAGES - 	

	 	
a
3
a
7
10
11
11
11
14
IB
1.
17
IS
19
2O
21
22
23
24
23
26
27
26
t*
X
31
32
33
34
33
36
37
36
3D
4O
41
41
43
44
43
46
47
48
30
31
32
B3
B4
33
se
»7
38
BO
60
61
62
63
63
66
07
68
6»
70
71
72
73
74
73
V

-------
DAILY SUMMARY OF RESULTS
LOCATIONS RICKENBACKEH
OATEt 3- 1-80
TIME
0
100
2OO
300
400
	 _500 	
600
TOO
AOO
900
1000
	 	 1100
1200
1300
iaoo
1500
1600
1 1600
UJ 1900
^ 2OOO
2100
2200
2300
* AVERAGES
1 OF DATA
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MEAN.
STD.OEV.
X STO.OEV.
24-HOUR REMOVAL
i
(MEANJ t i f
': 1 IN
i
> y
LOAD E
IN
108. 5.630
106. 5.233
106. 5.296
110. 5.35u
111. 	 b.3fl3 .
111. 5.430
111. 5.262
19*. V°l
134. 5.500
134. *•«*««
.131. 	 Ht.98fg.
131. ****«•
131. »•*««•
127. 5.260
117. 5.24tt
•122. 5.240
123. 5.323
194, S,107
126. 5.260
126. 5.254
24. 19.
1OO. 7«.
106. 5.221
134. 5.830
121. 5.336
10. .140
8. 2.629
AFB 1900
E
OUT
" .557
.414
!557
.54t»
.482
.535
gasaea
*•*•««•
**••*«
.33«;
.254
.244
.313
.370
1.053
1.071
. .491
19.
'«»
.244
1.071
.221
43.974
EFICIENCY USING
UUT
I
1 NOTES (MEAN] IS DEFINED AS:
X
': Trie HfcAN Kurt * OATS USiiiu Y-HUiiK
I.;
1-
1 	 	


EFF
90.4
92.1
92.6
91.9
U9.6
H9.8
»9.9
90.6
91.1
90.3
UttttOM
00000 „
««*««
*»*»•
93.7
95.2
95.3
94.0
93.1
91 .0
bO.O
79.6
90.7
19.
79T
79.620
95.321
90.597
4.165
4.619


AVtKA&tS



i ^
a
3
4
7
10
II
12
13
14
11
1.
17
1*
20
21
22
23
24
23
26
27
26
t*
3D
31
32
33
33
.16
37
36
M
40
41
42
43
44
43
46
47
46
4.
80
81
31
83
34
83
36
37
36
80
6O
Al
62
63
64
63
66
66
69
70
71
72
73
74
73
V

-------
               30 OPERATING DATS
               SUMMAMY OF KE5MLT5
               USING 1-HOUR AVERAGES

               LOCATION*
               DATES  1-25-80
                 AFH
LOAD.
fc. _________ -
 IN
                                               tFF
                  OUT
0     * AVERAGES      719. 622.     496.
      X OF DATA       100.  86.      69.     59.
1	 MINIMUM...	 23.   .4.020     .U97  77.«J«0   .
1     MAXIMUM          134.   6.935    1.166  98.207
      MEAN             110.   5.380     .436  91.98tt

      X STO.DEV.        9.   5.725   41.433   3^710

  	1Q-BAJ   H£MDVAJ..££ItlEN£t  USING,
              1
      (MEAN)    I  . E     I 91.902X
  	10  1M   OUT	
•2
1                  Y
    .  fO.TE.»__lMEA_Nl  15 Cffl&EB .AS:
                   X
   >         THE MEAN FOR X OATS  USING Y-HOUH AVERAGES
   J	.	
8  U1
   to


-2












  	I		



4B 		
                                                                                                                               21
                                                                                                                               21
                                                                                                                               23
                                                                                                                               24
                                                                                                                               37
                                                                                                                               SB .
                                                                                                                               42
                                                                                                                               4J
                                                                                                                               4B
                                                                                                                               SO
                                                                                                                               91
                                                                                                                              . 1?
                                                                                                                               OJ
                                                                                                                               54
                                                                                                                               BS
                                                                                                                               ne
                                                                                                                              " 37
                                                                                                                               »B
                                                                                                                               5> .
                                                                                                                               BO
                                                                                                                              " Bl
                                                                                                                               B2
                                                                                                                               AB
                                                                                                                               B7
                                                                                                                               6B
                                                                                                                              ~ ee
                                                                                                                               7O
                                                                                                                               73
                                                                                                                               74

-------
30 UPtRATINU DATS
SUMMAKY OK KESULTS
it
3
4
9
a
7
a
e
10
1 1
12
13
14
19
ia
17
ia
ia
20
21
u
23
24
29
29
27
2.
2.
30
31
32
33
34
39
J4
37
ja
3«
4O
41
42
43
44
45
47
49
50
92
»
14
USING
LOCA'I
DATES
J1ATE-

-26-00
-27-00
	 	 -20-00 	
-31-00
2- 1-00
2- 3-00
2- 4-00
	 	 2r. 5-00.
2- 7-00
2- 0-00
2-10-00
2-11-00
	 > 2-12-OP .. .
1 2-13-00
<£ 2-14-00
2-15-00
2-16-00
2-17-00
2-19-00
2-20-00
2-21-10
2-26-00
2-27-00
2-20-00
2-29-00
3- 1-00
» AVERAGES
X UF DATA
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MEAN
STD.OEV.
24-HOUR AVERAGES
1-25-00
LOAD .E. JL
IN OUT
107. 5.050 .534
110. 5.340 .373
108... .5.293 .416
113. 5.211 .546
113. 5.456 .452
114. 5.255 »•»»»*
116. 5.422 .605
...11.0.._ 5.375 . .432.
113. 5.511 «**•••
109. 5.240 ««•**»
l|2. S.«T» Tla|
111. 5.543 **••**
113. 5.309 .439
	 Hi. 	 5.159 .200.
111. 5.126 «»«««»
109. 5.435 .219
101. S-fc78 •«*•••
106. 5.650 *•**«*
113. 5.653 .449
93. 5.565 .295
97. *»••»• .427
•9, nmmmnm .a?p
100. «•*»*» .620
120. 5.252 .477
115. 5.202 .466
US. 5.305 .509
121. S.330 .502
30. 27. 22.
97. 07. 71.
09. 4.710 .219
121. 5.710 .620
110. 5.375 .437
X STO.DEV. b. 4.123 23.730
30-fcAT PCMUVAL EFLCIENCt USING
24
CMEANJ E , E I 91.076X
SO IN OUT
Y
NyTfcS (MEANJ
X
THE MEAN
IS UEFINEU AS:
FOH X DAYS USING V-HUUH


#9.7
09.4
93.0
92.3
09.5
91.7
• SIM*
oo.o
92.0
• »*•»
***»«
*»*»«
91.0
94.4
96.0
• «•«*
92.0
94.7
94.6
**••«
• •*««
90.9
91.2
90.6
90.6
19.
61.
6B.fl03
95.975
91.940
Z.OJh
2.216

AVbkAGES
a






JO
33
39
M
37
3.
M
4O
41
42
43
44
49
4«
47
4B
4ft
SO
91
92
93
94
99
99
97
98
9B
ao
at
02
83
64
63
ea
07
aa
ea
7O
71
72
73
74
79
'V

-------
FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION
LOCATION! RICKENBACKEM
STARTING DATE! 1-25-80
PARAMfTfRt 1-MOUH EIN.
AFB 1980
LH/MMHTIi
OCCURRENCt
PARAMETER RANGE FREQUENCY pEKCtwiAGE HISTOGRAM
3.000 - 3.400 0.
3.4JIO - 3.800 0-
3.800 - 4.200 1.
4.200 - 4.600 12.
4.600 - 5,000 55.
5.000 - 5.400 306.
5.400 - 5. BOO 331.
5.8.00 - 6.200 37.
6.200 - 6.600 2.
6.600 - 7.000 0.
0.
0.
0.
2. •
7. »•«*
41. •**••*••*****«••**••
44. A*********************
5. *•
0.
0.
BEYOND MIN/MAX RAN6E 3.
TOTAL POPULATION 747.

*f CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION
01
*> LOCATIONI RICKCNBACKER
DATE! 1-25-80
PARAMETER! 1-HOUR EIN,
AFH 19HO
LB/HMBTU
OCCURRENCE
PARAMETER RANGE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE HISTOGRAM
.000 - 3.400 0.
.000 - 3.800 0.
.000 - 4,200 1,
.000 - 4.600 13.
.000 - 5.000 66.
.000 - 5.400 374.
.000 - 5.800 705.
.000 - 6.200 742.
,000 - 6,600 744.
.000 - 7.000 744.
BEYOND MIN/MAX HANCF 3*
TOTAL POPULATION 747.
0.
0.
0.
2. •
9. *****
SO. ••••*••**•*•••*••*••*•***
100. ** ft***************** A*****************************
100. ft*************************************************

	 	 _.
a
3
4
•
•
7
•
a
10
11
12
13
14
10
te
IT
IB
19
2O
21
22
21
24
23
26
27
28
1*
10
31
32
33
34
39
36
37
38
X
4O
41
42
43
44
49
4«
47
4a
4»
9O
91
92
83
84
99
96
37
98
00
60
C 1
62
6.1
r.4
65
66
67
68
60
0
2
3
4
9
V

-------
FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION
LOCATION: RICKENBACKEH AFB i
STARTING DATE! 1-25-80
IYARAMFTFBI I.HnilB 1 nc FIM
OCCURRENCE
PARAMETER RANGE FREUUEHCY.— PEK
.500 - .535 0.
.570 - .605 1.
.605 - .640 1.
_»6,4_0_ • .675 17.
.675 - .710 110.
.710 - .745 425.
-745 • TT«D lAfl.
.760 - .615 6.
.815 - .650 0.
BEYOND MIN'MAX RANGE 3.
TOTAL POPULATION 747.

> CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION
U1
,_n inCATfONi a i tLf.fttmc.it ra AFB |
DATE: i-25-eo
PARAMETER: I-HOUR LOG EIN
980
CtNTAbE
0.
0,
0.
0.
2.
15.
57.
1.
0.
- -

OCCURRENCE
PARAMETER RANGE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
.500 - .535 0.
.500 - .570 0.
.500 - .605 1.
.500 - .640 2.
.500 - .675 19.
.500 - .710 1^9,
.500 - ,7a5 554.
.500 - .780 738.
,5011 - ,8J5 744.
.500 - .850 744.
BEYOND MIN/HAX RANGE 3.
TOTAL POPULATION 747.
0.
0.
0.
0.
3.
11.
74.
99.
100.
100.


HlSlm.RAM


**»*••*
•ft**************************





HISTOGRAM

*********
*************************************
A*************************************************

i ^
a
a
4
7
10
II
12
ia
14
IS
17
IB
IB
20
21
22
23
24
23
26
27
2B
2*
ao
31
32
14
33
.16
37
39
3»
40
41
42
43
44
49
49
47
SO
SI
92
B3
94
99
S9
57
98
BB
60
62
63
A4
63
66
67
69

-------
FNEUUENCY DISTRIBUTION
LOCATION: RICKENBACKEK AFB i960
STAHTINK DATES 1-25-60
PARAMFTFRi 1-HQIIB EOUT. LR/MMRTII
PARA M£
.010
.IS*
.306
.457
*606
.753
.904
l.QSI
1.202
1.351
BEYOND
TOTAL

JP
1
VI
TER RANGE .
.159
,.108
.457
.606
.904
• 1.053
- 1,202
- 1.351
• 1.500
OCCURRENCE
FREQUENCY PEHCENIAGE
29. 4.
150., : ;»*.
237.
154.
23.
6.
4.
0.
0.
36.
23.
IV.
3.
1.
0.
0.
HISTOGRAM
**
..A*.****.**.*.**
****•»***•*
***********
*****




*******
*


MIN/MAX RANGE 0.
POPULATION 664.

CUMULATIVE
__LDCAT1DJI1_
DISTRIBUTION "
RICKEMBACKFR AFB I9«0
DATE: i-25-eo
; PARAMETER! 1-HOUR EOUT,
PARAMETER RANGE
.010
.010
_,010
.010
.010
.010
.010
.010
,010
.010
BEYOND
TOTAL

.159
.306
,457
.606
.755
• .904
- 1.053
- 1.202
- 1,351
• 1.500
JUN/MAX JIAJI
POPULATION

LB/MHBTU
OCCURRENCE
FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
25.
175.
412.
566.
631,
6*4.
660.
664.
664,
664.
GE 0,
664.

4.
26.
62.
65.
95.
48.
99.
100.
100.
100.


HISTOGRAM




**
*************
*******************************
ft******************************************
A***********************************************
••••A*********************************************
.••I**********************************************
**************************************************

	 • — -
	 	
A
*
9
4




23
1C
«•
10
31
>t
35
3«
37
98
4O
41
42
43
44
48
48
47
48
4*
9O
81
92
93
84
55
57
88
90
CO
61
02
91
e5
a«
07
B9
as
70
71
72
73
74
n

-------
FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION
LOCATION! R1CKENBACKER
STARTING DATE! 1-35-80
PABAUfTFDt I.UQUB LnC
OCCUR
PARAMETER RANliE FHEUUENCT
-2.000 - -1.TB2 0.
• l.TAj» . .I.Sfc* 4.
-1.564 - -1.346 1.
•1.306 - -1.128 0.
. ... -1.12IL- -.910 7.
-.910 - -.698 50.
-.692 • -.474 163.
•.•?• • *T9Sfc 'PO.
-.856 - -.038 133.
-.036 - .180 0.
BEYOND HIM/MAX RANGE 10.
TOTAL POPULATION 664.
•f CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION
01
-O LOCATIONS RICKEMBACKFfl
DATE: i-25-eo
PARAMETER: I-HOUR LOG

AFU 1900
tOMT
RENCt
PFHCfcNIAKE HISTOGRAM
0.
0.
0.
0.
1- *
8. **•*
25. ••*••••***••
45. ***«*******«*»***^«***
20 . *»«••»»•••
0.


AFR |«MO
EOUT
OCCURRENCE
PARAMETER RAN6E FREUUENCY PERCENTAGE HISTOGRAM
-2.000 - -1.782 0.
-2.000 - -1.564 0.
-2,i»00 - -1.346 1.
•2.000 - -1.128 1.
•2.000 • -.910 8.
•2. OOp • -,692 5«,
-2.000 - -.474 221.
-2.000 - -.256 521.
•2,009 • -»018 654.
-2.000 • .160 654.
MFVQMD MIM/MAK BAMCF 10.
TOTAL POPULATION 664.

0.
0.
0.
0.
1. •
9. •••*
33. ••**•••••*•***•**
78. •••*•*••••»•*«*•••*•••**••*»•••*•••••••
9tt, A************************************************
98. *•••*•••••*•*••«•*»*•••*•*••*••••••*•••••••*••••*
- - 	 	 —


r'
a
j
4
•
•
7
•
•
10
1 1
12
11
14
IB
16
17
18
1O
20
21
22
23
24
29
2<
27
2B
t*
fa
3t
32
S3
Vi
39
3fl
37
38
M
4O
41
42
43
44
49
4a
47
48
40
5O
91
92
83
94
89
96
87
98
00
eo
et
82
83
n
«e
• 7
ae
60
70
71
72
73
74
79
V

-------
FREQUENCY 0 1 S ! R I BUT I ON
LOCATION: RICKENBACKER AFU i9»o
STARTING DATE! 1-25-60
PAHAMETEHl 1-HOUH X EFFICIENCY
OCCURRENCE
PARAMETER RANGE . FREUUENCY PEKCtNTAtE HlSTObRAM
60.000 - 63.990 0.
61.990 - 67.980 0,
67.980 - 71.970 0.
71.970 - 75.960 0.
75^960 - 79.950 3.
79.950 • 83.9(10 15.
•5.940 - 67.930 «7.
• 7.MO - 91.920 200-
91.920 - 95.9JO 303.
95.910 - 99.900 0.
0.
...— 0,
o.
0.
0.
2. «
7. •***
Jt, *****••**•»*•»***
<48, ******•***•*******••*•*•
0.
BEYOND MIN/MAX RANGE 68.
TOTAL POPULATION 636.
•f ~ ~ CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION
Ul
00 LOCATION! RICKENBACKER

AFB 1980
DATE: t-25-60
PARAMETER: I-HOUR x EFFICIENCY
OCCURRENCE
PARAMETER RANGE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE HISTOGRAM
60.000 - 63.990 0.
60.000 - 67.960 0.
60,000 - 71,970 0_.
60.000 - 75.960 0.
60.000 - 79.950 J.
60.000 - 83.940 i8-
60. 000 - 67.930 65.
60.000 - 91.920 265.
60j,000 - 95.910 566.
60.000 - 99.900 568.
BEYOND MIN/MAX RANGE 68.
TOTAL POPULATION 636.

- 	 	
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
10. *****

-------
FREUUENCV DISTRIBUTION
LOCATIONS RICKENBACKEH
STARTING DATES 1-25-80
AFB 1900
OCCURRENCE
PARAMETER RANGE _ . FHEUUENCI.. . PERCENTAGE HISTOGRAM
.700 - .730 f,
.710 . T7fcO •.V"r ''•''
.760 - .790 0.
.790 - .820 0.
	 . ^B2J> ...... .850 ... Q.
.850 - .880 0.
.880 - .910 4.
.«ia . t««a *«s.
.940 - 1.970 337.
.970 - 2.000 0.
o*
0.
0.
0. . . .
0.
1.
T , •*»»
53. »••••»••*•••»*»••••••***••
0.
BEYOND MIN/MAX RANGE 250.
TOTAL POPULATION 636,

•f CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION
01
ID LOCATION! RICKFMBACKFR

AFA 1980
DATE! 1-25-80
PARAMETER! 1-HOUR LOGU EFFICIENCY)
OCCURRENCE
•ARAMCTCR RANGE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE HISTOGRAM
1.700 - 1.730 0.
1.700 - 1.760 0.
1.700 - 1.790 0.
1.700 - 1.820 0.
1.700 - 1.850 0.
1.700 - iTaao 0T
1.700 - 1.910 4.
1.700 = 1.940 «9.
1,700 - 1*970 Jflfr.
1.700 - 2.000 386.
BEYOND HIM/MAC RAHBF 2«0.
TOTAL POPULATION 636.
0.
o.
0.
0.
0.
0*
1.
8. •*»*
61. »*»**«••»•*••••••»*••••*••••••



a
3







33
34
39
in
37
38
41
42
43
44
43
48
47
48
49
9O
91
92
93
94
33
98
37
98
8O
8O
81
82
83
84
83
88
87
88
7O
71
72
73
74
79
V

-------
FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION
LOCATION! RICKENBACKEH A
STARTING DATE: i-as-oo
PARAMETER! 1-HOUR 100-1
OCCURH
... . PARAMETER RftNGE FHEUgENCJL
.010 - 4.009 63.
• .009 • S.OOfl 296T
8.008 - 12.007 211.
12.007 • J 6.006 48.
16.gOfr -.20.005 	 14.
20.005 - 24.004 4.
24.004 - 28.003 0.
28.001 - 32.002 0.
32.002 • 36.001 0.
36.001 - 40.000 0.
BEYOND MIN/MAX KANGE 0.
TOTAL POPULATION 636.

FB 1980
..EFFICIENCY
ENCE
PEKCtNfAGE
10.
«7.
33.
».
2.
1.
0.
o.
0.
0.


HISTOGRAM
*****
***••*•••


•••****•••••*•
A****************
****
•







•^ CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION
O>
O LOCATION! RICKEMBACKER AFB I9fl0
DATE: 1-25-80
PARAMETER: I-HOUK loo-x
EFFICIENCY
OCCURRENCE
PARAMETER RANGE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
.010 - 4.004 63.
.010 - 8.008 359.
,010 - 12,007 570,
.010 » 16.006 618.
.010 • 20.005 632.
.010 • 24.004 636.
.010 - 28.003 636.
.010 - 32.002 636.
,010 - 36,001 636.
.010 - 40.000 636.
	 BEY QUO HIM/MAIL RAMGE 0.
TOTAL POPULATION 636.

10.
56.
90.
97.
99.
100.
100.
100.
100.
100.


HISTOGRAM


*****
A***************************
A************************************************
to************************************************
*****•••*******••*. ******************************^
A*************************************************
A*************************************************
- • •-


	 	
A
2
3
4
a
a
7
•
9
10
II
11
13
14
IB
!•
IT
ie
t«
20
21
22
2>
24
23
2<
27
ie
t*
30
31
32
33
34
33
3 ft
ST
3B
3«
4O
41
42
43
44
49
4«
47
48
49
9O
91
92
93
94
99
9«
S7
99
90
eo
2
3
4
65
69
67
08
ee
7O
71
72
73
74
79
7 a/

-------
FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION
LOCATION: RICKENBACKEH
STARTING DATES 1-2&-80
PARAMFTFRl JvMQIIB |_"G'
AFB 1980
100. I FFFtrlFMrVl
OCCURRENCE
PARAHEJER RANGE FHEUUfNCY PFHCFNlAtE HISTOURAM
•2.000 • -1.640 0. .
»iT8»aa m .t.PAo a.
•1.280 - -.920 0.
-.920 - -.560 0.
-.560 - -,2UO 1,
•.200 - .160 0.
.160 • .520 38.
f^PO •» TJIAfi ?*^.
.880 - 1.240 304.
1.240 - 1.600 0.
0.
0 • ' •
0.
0.
0.
0.
6. **•
• *t •».••*•»•»•»;»;*•»»•«;•••»'
48. ••»••••*»»•*•«••*••«**•«
0.
BEYOND MIN/MAX RANGE 8.
TOTAL POPULATION 636.

•? CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION
0.
M LQCAT1OMI fflCKEMAACKER

APR 1980
DATE: i-25-eo
PARAMETER! 1-HOUR LOGUOO-X EFFICIENCY)
OCCURRENCE
PARAMETER RANGE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE HISTOGRAM
•2.000 - -1.640 0.
•2.000 - -1.200 0.
-2.000 - -.920 0.
•2.000 • -.560 0.
•2.000 - -.200 1.
•2.0QO • .160 i;
•2.000 - .520 39.
•2.000 - .860 324.
-2.000 - 1,240 628.
•2.000 • 1.600 628.
1 BEYOND MIN/MAX RAMCF B,
' TOTAL POPULATION 636.
'
:
»
i
i
i
t
5
7
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
o.
6. . •*•
51, ••»***» ••«•***»*•«*•»•*•*
99. • «»««•»•«»••*••*«« *«***************************4*
99. •*••• •**•***•***•••*•*•*••******•*•••****•••**•••
... ..
- •• 	 -
i ^






X*
30
31
32
34
33
36
37
38
3O
4O
41
41
41
44
43
46
47
48
40
3O
91
32
B3
94
99
96
97
38
80
eo
62
63
66
67
60
69
7O
71
72
7.1
74
79
V

-------
        FNFUIIENCV DISTRIBUTION
        LOCATIONS RICKEN8ACKER  AFB  1980
        STARTING DATES   1-25-60
        »ABAMFTFRt 3«-MQUB  FINf LH/MMflTy  	
PARAMETER
3.000 -  3.400
        OCCURRENCE
. FHEUUEJIC.!	PERCENTAGE
                                               HISTOGRAM
3.600
4.200
5.000
5.400
5.600
6.200
6.600
•
•
•
•
4.200
4.600
5.000
5.400
5.600
6.200
6.600
7.000
                        0.
                        0.
                        0.
                        0.
                        1.
                        14.
                        12.
                        0.
BEYOND MIN/MAX RAN6E
TOTAL POPULATION
     0.
     0.

     0.
    27.
                                    0.
                                    fl.
                                    0.
                                    0.
                                    4.
                                   52.
                                   44.
                                   _0_.
                                    0.
                                    0.
                                                                                                                       10
                                                                                                                       It
                                                ••••A*********************
                                                •••A******************
                                                                                                                       IS
                                                                                                                       14
                                                                                                                       IB
                                                                                                                       ia
                                                                                                                       IB
                                                                                                                       20
                                                                                                                                         12
                                                                                                                                         23
                                                                                                                                         24
                                                                                                                                        " 2J'
                                                                                                                                         20
                                                                                                                                         27
 N)
        CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION
        LOCATIONS RlCKENftACKER  AFH  IQftQ
        DATES  1-2S-BO
        PARAMETER: 24-HOUR  EIN,  LH/MMBTU
PARAMETER RANBE
.000 -
.000 -
          3.400
          3.600
  .000 -  4.600
  .000 »  5.000
  .000 «  5.400
        OCCURRENCE
 FREQUENCY     PERCENTAGE
                                               HISTOGRAM
      0.
      0.
      0,
      6.
      I.
     15.
  .000 -  5.600         27.
  .000 -  6.200         27.
  100.0 _-..6^600	27.
  .000 •  7.000         27.
                                      0.
                                      0.
                                     ...Q..
                                      0.
                                      4.
                                                                                                                                          11
                                                                                                                                          132
                                                                                                                                          l»
                                                                                                                       37
                                                                                                                       38
                                                                                                                       3O
49
4«
47
48
40
SO
91
                  100.
                  100.
                  loo.
                  100.
                              A*************************************************
                                               **************•****<
                                               ft*************************************************
                                                                                                                                        99
                                                                                                                                        ne
BEYQMD MIN/MAI BAMBg
TOTAL POPULATION
                         0.
     27.
                                                                                                                                          71
                                                                                                                                          72
                                                                                                                                         ' 73
                                                                                                                                          74
                                                                                                                                          79

-------
FREUUENCY DISTRIBUTION
r LOCATION: RICKENBACKEK
2 STARTING DATE! 1-2S-80
AFB 1980
4
• OCCURRENCE
." :._. _ PARAMETER. RANGE FKEUUEN.CI 	 PERCENTAGE
7
• .500 - .535 0. 0.
10 .570 - .605 0.
" .605 - .640 0.
11 .6j»g - ..675 1. .
13 .675 - .710 2.
.710 - .745 18.
19 -T» • .7*0 fc.
'• .780 - .815 0.
17 .815 - .850 0.
ta
" BEYOND MIN/MAX RANGE 0.
20 TOTAL POPULATION 27.
21
22
23
24
" *f CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION
z« a\
" tO LOCATION! RlCKFNftACKEB
" DATEJ 1-25-80
28 PARAMETER: 24-HOUR LOG
3O
0.
0.
. . 4.
7.
67.
0.
0.
AFB |«40
EIN
31 OCCURRENCE
32 PARAMETER RANGE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
33
34 .500 - .535 0.
38 .500 - .570 0.
34 .500 - .605 0.
37 .500 - .640 0.
" .500 - .675 1.
» .500 . -710 1,
40 .500 - .745 21.
41 ,500 - .780 «!7.
" .500 -_ .815 27.
43 .500 • .850 27.
«4
" QEVOND MIN/MAI RANGE 0.
46 TOTAL POPULATION 27.
47
4U
**
3.
0.
0.
0.
0.
4.
1 1 .
7«.
100.
loo.
100.


HISTOGRAM

**. . .
«...
•••••••*•*•••••»*••••»•••••«••••»
•.......•*•





HISTOGRAM

..
......
»«»•»«*««»•»*•»»»•»»»»»»*«»»••»•*»»»••»»*•»•»•••**
..................................................

93
54
3
a
3
4
7
10
1 1
11
13
14
IB
17
16
ig
20
21
22
23
24
23
27
2a
30
31
32
JJ
34
33
36
37
sa
3*
40
4 1
42
43
44
43
46
47
.a
40
30
31
32
63
B4
33
56
57
sa
60
eo
•
A4
6*
67
00
70
71
72
73
74
73

-------
FHEOUENCY DISTRIBUTION
LOCATION: RICKENBACKEH AFB i9ao
STARTING DATE: 1-25-80
.PARAMETERS 24-HOUR EOUT. LR/MMRTU
PARAMETER RA.NGE
.010
.159
.308
.457
. . . ..606.
.755
.904
1-055
1.202
1.351
BEYOND
TOTAL
.159
-JOB
.457
.606
r ,755
.904
- 1.0S3
. 1,202
- 1.351
• 1.500
OCCURRENCE
FREUUENCY PERCENTAGE H1STOURAM
0.
<».
8.
	 	 1. 	
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
IB. ***•*.

41. •••••»••«••••*•»*•••
36. •«••**••*••»**•**•
5. . . ••
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.


MIN/MAX RANGE 0.
POPULATION 22.

1
CUMULATIVE
LOCATIONS
DISTRIBUTION
•ICKEMAACKER AFB 14AO
DATE: i -25-80
PARAMETER: 24-HOUR EOUT,
PARAMETER RANGE
.010
.010
.010
.010
.010
.010
.010
. ... .010
.010
	 BEYOND
TOTAL
.159
.308
.45? ....
.606
.755
• .904
- 1.053
- 1.351
LB/MMBTU

OCCURRENCE
FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE HISTOGRAM
0.
4.
13.
21.
2t.

- 1.500 22.
JtlNy.MA.JL BAMRE 0 .
POPULATION
22.
0.
18. •««»»•**•
95. *»•••«•»•**»•••«••«•»••••**••*•»***•••••**•*••••
100. *••»•*•»•••»»*»•••**•»••••**••••«**•••*••»•»•••••• .
(00, A************* *.*******************:******»»**»«>»*.i
100. *****
loO. *•««•
100. *****
100. *****

*!*!"!. "IIIIir.IIII.II. ..III. I".!.."!""
•A*******************************************

.... ----- - 	 	
TV






10
33
39
3A
37
M
39
4O
42
43
44
49
4«
47
4.
4.
9O
91
92
93
99
9<
97
9.
99
•0
:;
"
63
60
07
ea
OB
0
1
2
3
4
9

-------
FNEUUENCY DISTRIBUTION
LOCATIONS R1CKENBACKEH
STARTING OATEI 1-35-60
• AB^MFTfDl ?«.MQIIB Lnt
AFU I960
POUT
OCCURRENCE
PAR1M£I£8 RANEE . FK£UU£1*CJL ._ PEKCENIAGE
.2.000 - -1.782 o,
•tr'*2 • •!.**• 0.
-1.564 - -1.316 0.
-1.346 - -1.128 0.
	 -U12jHL.-_..-«,910. _ Q.
-.»IO - -.692 0.
-.6*2 - -.474 4.
v.AT* • • >StV ]t
-.256 - -.038 8.
-.030 - .ISO 0.
8EYONO NIN/MAX RANGE 0.
TOTAL POPULATION 22.
l£j
1 CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION
(^
d (nr»T|nMi BincrMBACKrii
DATE: l-as-eo
PARAMETER! 20-HOUR LOG
0.
0
0.
0.
- 0.
0.
18.
73.
9.
0.
A*V |QAO
EOUT
OCCURRENCE
PARAMETER RAN6E FREBUENCV PERCENTAGE
•2.000 - -1.782 0.
-2.000 - -1.560 0.
-2.000 - -1.346 0.
-2.000 - -1.128 0.
-2.000 - -.910 0.
-2.000 - -.692 0.
-2.000 - -.074 4.
-2.000 - -.256 20,
-2jOOO - -^038 22.
-2.000 - .180 22.
BEYOMD HIM/MAI RAMCF 0.
TOTAL POPULATION 22.



0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0T
18.
91.
10P.
100.
	 	


. HISTObHAM . ..


•*•••••**
. . *ft*ft**AA*ft*ft*ftft***ftft*fr4*4ft***^*4*^**
*****




HISTOGRAM

•
•*•*•*•*•
•A*******************************************
•«*********************************************ft*ft
•A************************************************




i^
i
3
4
•
•
7
•
•
10
11
13
14
IB
I*
17
18
I*
30
21
22
21
24
29
2<
27
2fl
t*
to
31
32
13
34
33
in
37
31
30
40
41
42
43
44
43
4e
47
46
49
3O
SI
32
B3
B4
09
Be
97
96
OS
eo
01
• 2
03
84
O3
ee
•7
oa
69
7O
71
72
73
74
76
V

-------
FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION
LOCATION: RICKENBACKEH AFB i960
STARTING DATE: i-25-so
PARAMETfRl 24-MOUR « EFFICIENCY
OCCURRENCE
, .-PARAMETER -RANGE . FKEUUE.NJCJL PEKCENUGE
60.000 - 63.990 0.
4J-990 . A7.9BO 0T
67.980 - 71.970 0.
71.970 - 75.960 0.
7§.9|»g - 79.959 0.
79.950 - 83.940 0.
65.940 • 87.930 0.
87.930 - 91.920 10,
91.920 - 95.910 8.
95.910 - 99.900 0.
BEYOND MIN/MAX RANGE 1.
TOTAL POPULATION 19.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
o!
HISTOGRAM



A********************


"f CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION
<7> LOCATION! RICKENIACKFR
AFB 1980

DATE: i-25-so
PARAMETER: 24-HOUR X EFFICIENCY
OCCURRENCE
PARAMETER RANGE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
60.000 - 63.990 0.
60.000 - 67.980 0.
60.000 - 71.970 0.
60.000 - 75.960 0.
60.000 - 79.950 0.
60.000 • 83.940 0.
60.000 - 87.930 0.
60.000 - 91.920 10.
60*000 - 95.9JO l«t
60.000 - 99.900 18.
BEYOND MIN/MAX RANfiE 1.
TOTAL POPULATION 19.



0.
0.
0.
0.
. o.
fl-
0.
53.
.. .. . 95. 	
95.


HISTOGRAM

4
*«•*•»«•»•*«*•***»•*•••**•
ft**********************************************
•a*********************************************




i
1
3
4
B
7
to
1 1
11
13
14
IB
18
17
18
20
11
11
21
14
23
17
t*
JO
31
32
33
14
39
37
38
39
4O
41
4J
44
49
47
48
49
91
92
93
B4
B9
98
07
B«
99
8O
ei
82
83
A4
89
86
87
88
89
70
71
72
7J
74

-------
FREUUENCV DISTRIBUTION
A
1*
1 4
B
7
0
IO
1 1
12
14
13
ia
17
18
IB
20
21
U
21
24
28
28
27
2»
30
11
12
11
»
17
18
IB
4O
41
42
41
44
43
48
47
At
49
3O
3 1
32
31
34
Sf.
37
LOCATION: RICKENBACKER AFB i960
STARTING DATE: i-25-ao
0ADAUfTfBI ?«.MQfJR |_06(I EFFICIENCY)
OCCURRENCb
PARAMETER RANGE FREUUENCY PFKf.tNTAKF HISTOGRAM
.700 - .730 0.
.760 - .790 0.
.790 - .820 0.
	 .aau .-.. ,B:»O 	 o» 	
.650 - .aao o.
.880 - .910 0.
T«IO • ,9«0 A.
1.940 - .970 14.
1.970 - 2.000 0.
0.
-'-' 0. - -
0.
0.
0. ... 	 	 . _ 	 	
0.
0.
74. ****•••••*••*•*••*••***•••**•**••*•••>
0.
BEYOND MIN/MAX RANGE 5.
TOTAL POPULATION 19.

^ CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION
0 LOCATION! RICKFMBACKFB
AFR 19AQ
DATE: i-25-so
PARAMETER: 24-HOUR LOG(X EFFICIENCY)
OCCURRENCE
PARAMETER RANGE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE HISTOGRAM
.700 - .730 0.
.700 - .760 0.
.700 - .790 0.
.700 - .820 0.
.700 - .850 •.
.700 - .910 0.
.700 - .940 0.
.700 - .9/0 14.
1.700 - 2.000 14.
HEVOND MIN/MAX RANGE 4.
TOTAL POPULATION 19.
1
r - ' "~ ~
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
o.
7
-------
FHEUUENCV DISTRIBUTION
LOCATION: RICKENBACKEH AFB i9«o
STARTING DATE: 1-25-00
PARAMFTERl 24-HOUR 100-1 FFFJPIFNrY
OCCURRENCE
PARAMETE" RANGE FHEUUENCY PEKCILNTAGE HISTOGRAM
.010 • 4.009 0.
4.009 - 6.00A 9.
6.000 - 12.007 10.
12.007 - 16.006 0.
16^006 - 20,005 Q.
20.005 - 24.004 0.
24.004 - 26.003 0.
26.003 - 32.002 Ot
32.002 - 36.001 0.
36.001 - 40.000 0.
0.
S3. •**» ***•**••*.*•••»••••***
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
BEYOND MIN/MAX RAN6E 0.
TOTAL POPULATION 19.

"f CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION
0° LOCATIONI RICKENHACMFR AFB 1980 . 	
DATE: 1-25-00
PARAMETER: 24-HOUR 100-1
EFFICIENCY
OCCURRENCE
PARAMETER RANGE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE HISTOGRAM
.010 - 4.009 0.
.010 - 0.000 9.
_*010 - 12,007 19.
.010 • 16.006 19.
.010 - 20.005 19.
-010 • 24T004 19-
.010 - 20.003 19.
.010 - 32.002 19.
,010 • 36,001 .. 19.
.010 • 40.000 19.
BEYQND MTN/MAI HANBF 0*
TOTAL POPULATION 19.
0.
47. *•****»*«**«•»****»••••*
JV°. *•»«»»»•»«*••«*«•**«»********•**•*•»•••*••*••***;*•
too. •«*•*•***•••***•**«**•'•***•**•*••••••••*••*••»••••
100. *»»»***»•»»«»«»**«».***•*»*»••****••*••••*•***•*••
100. A*************************************************
100. A*************************************************
....

2
3
4
7
9
10
1 1
12
13
14
ta
te
17
IS
20
21
22
23
24
2«
27
28
t*
JO
31
32
33
34
30
37
M
X
40
41
41
43
44
4B
4.
47
46
49
9O
91
92
03
54
99
'
eo
eo
2
3
7
7
\

-------
FNEUUENCY DISTRIBUTION
LOCATION! RICKENBACKEK
STARTING DATE! 1-25-80
	 PARAMETER RAWGE
•2.000 - •1.640
-1.280 - -.920
-.920 - -.560
-»S6Q - -.200
•.200 - .160
.160 • .520
.880 - 1.240
1.240 • 1.600
AFB 1980
OCCURRENCE
FKEUUENCJf . HEKCtNTAGE HISTOGRAM
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
13.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
5?, • »**. ***»•»»»»«*;
°*
BEYOND MIN/MAX RANGE 0.
TOTAL POPULATION 19.

I CUMULATIVE
*O LOCATION!
DISTRIBUTION
RICBEMBACKFB

*m IQMO
DATE: i-25-ao
PARAMETER! 24-HOUR LOG(100-X EFFICIENCY)
PARAMETER RAN6E
•2.000 - -1.640
•2.000 - -1.280
•2.000 - -.560
•2.000 • -.200
OCCURRENCE
FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE HISTOGRAM
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
Q._
•2.000 - .520 0.
-2.000 - .880 6.
! -2,000 - 1,240 19,
•2.000 - 1.600 19.
BEYOND MIN/MAX RANCE 0.
TOTAL POPULATION
j
'.
\
\
1
'
1
19.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
100. »•*•««•••••»«••»*«•«•«*••*•»»»••«»••«««*«•»•«••«••
100. *........**»»..*.*».....*.***.».*..*..».......*«..
-


1^





»
X*
JO
31
32
S3
34
33
30
37
39
30
4O
41
41
43
44
43
40
47
48
4ft
90
51
32
B3
34
33
B6
57
30
BO
00
01
02
03
f>4
bS
e«
07
08
00
70
71
72
73
74
73

-------
DAILY SUMMAHY OF RESULTS
IUIAI 1U
DATE:
TIME
0
too
200
300
400
600
700
•00
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
>iaoo
^,1900
02000
2100
2200
2300
• AVERAGES
X OF DAT*
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MEAN
3TO.OEV.
X 8TD.OEV.
24-HOUR REMOVAL
1
(ME.ANJ fe , F
1 IN
r
NJ KJlKCNBAlfte
3- 2-80
LOAD E
IN
140. 5.221~
140. 5.326
|40. S,«5
140. 5.193
140. 5.154
HO. _ 5.054
140. 5.171
140. 5.133
I«ST s. in
133. 5.174
137. 5.183
135t_ 5.195
127. 5.077
127. 5.000
125. .781
125. .813
114. .657
H3. ,94J
116. .949
117. .985
119. .027
120. 5.004
123. 4.990
125. 5.086
24. 24.
100T 100.
113. 4.781
145. 5.326
10. .140
8. 2.752
K Ar- b 110
E
OUT
" .432
.425
.193
.264
.lib
.413
.342
.266
.205
.267
.420
.299
.283
.206
.274
.**?*#*
******
******
******
******
17.
71.
.146
******
******
V
Iff
91.7
92.0
96.3
94.9
91.0
92.0
93.3
94.8
96.0
94.6
91.9
94.1
94.3
95.7
94.4
*****
*****
*****
*****
17.
71,
91.731
96.956
******
******
EFICIENCY USING
OUT

NOTE* (MEAN) IS DEFINED AS:
X
THE MfcAN FOH * DATS USING Y-HUUK

AVL»AGtS ' 	

2
3
4
B
7
9
10
11
12
t4
IB
18
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
23
20
27
28
30
31
32
£3
34
33
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
43
48
47
48
a
0
i
2
3
84
33
38
37
B9
«0
01
o:
63
86
O7
on
OB
70
71
72
73
74
73
TV

-------
DAILY SUMMARY OF RESULTS
LOCATION: RICKENBACKEH AFH I9«o
DATE: 3- 3-ao
TIME
0
100
.00
300
400
5.0D 	 -
600
700
flOO
900
1000
11VQ
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
hK. I700
•f 1800
^j 1900
M 2000
2100
2200
2300
9 AV.MA6C8
1 OF DATA
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
8TO.DEV.
1 STD.DEV.
LOAD E E
IN OUT
131. 5.0*3 ••**»*
132. 4.971 •••••«
jf_. 9.«.f«- M-fffl*
136. 5.190 .171
136. 5.147 .354
136. 	 5.25b .387
134. 5.100 .392
134. 5.163 .433
124. 5.210 .452
109. 5.106 .444
126.. b.jeb .551
120. 5.476 .699
128. 5.492 .697
117, «,AA- ,-*•
117. 5.424 .522
115. 5.221 .461
117. .5.1411 .451
118. 5.244 .367
120. 5.275 .458
121. «.21« ,501
122. 5.317 .467
124. 5.543 .474
125. 5.450 .bOO
84. 24. 21.
100. 100. MM.
109. 4.971 .171
136. 5.543 .699
125, 5.259 ,462
0. .156 .111
6. 2.969 ai. 919
EFF
«««*«
• **«*
96.7
93.1
92.6
92.4
91.6
91.3
91.4
89.6
87.2
_7.3
91 .5
90.4
90.0
91.2
93.0
91.3
40,1
91.2
91.4
90.6
21.
A«,
07.230
96.696
91.291
1.940
2.134
24-HOUR REMOVAL EFICIENCV USING
1
[MEANl 1 I E : 91.2081
1 IN
V
NOTES (MEAN)
X

OUT
IS DEFINED AS:
FQn A 5ai5 US INS T=Hvun




....... - . . ... 	 	 _____
3
4
9
7
10
1 1
12
13
14
IB
17
2O
21
22
23
24
29
26
27
36
K
31
32
39
37
3*
3*
4O
41
42
43
44
49
49
47
48
49
90
91
92
93
94
93
B«
97
98
99
6O
61
62
63
64
B9
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
74
79
'V

-------
        DAILY SUMMARY OF RESULTS
        LOCATION: RICKENBACKEH AF« I9ao
        DATES  3- 4-60
   TIME
LOAD
EFF
                        IN
                 OUT
0
100
200
300
400
500 -
" 600
700
BOO
900
1000
}100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
.L7.QO. _.._
•fieoo
s^900
M2000
2100
2200
2300
122.
122.
122*
122.
122.
	 122..
122.
122.
125.
128.
121.
	 11.?*..
110.
110.
106,
106.
95.
. 	 92...
90.
92.
91.
94.
95.
._.. _ .?»-..
5.1*7
5.019
5,017
5.022
r>.oi4
5.050 .
5.056
4.971
• T79P
4.719
4.628
..4.491
5.142
5.124
5.052
5.027
5.047
5.g«0
5.133
5.115
5.063
4.92B
5.006
.-}. •.«$!.-
.460
.437
»a«7
.263
.330
.322
.389
.366
Tfloa
.362
.376
.326
.273
.205
,215
.229
.195
.207
.266
.225
.202
.264
.313
.266
90.6
91.3
91.1
94.6
93.4
93.6
92.3
92.2
. 91.6
92.3
91 .9
92.7
94.7
96.0
95.1
95.5
96.1
95.9
94.8
95.6
96.0
94.6
93.7
94.7
• AVERA6E8
X OF DATA
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MEAN. . ._. .
3TO.OEV.
X 8TD.DEV.
24. i
100. 11
90.
14.
12.
f ™ •
4.491
5.142
1.986
.165
3,110
24.
100.
.195
.085
47.694
24.
U0.._
90.629
9t>.138
93.790
1.773
1.890
24-HOUR REMOVAL EFICIENCV USING
       I
        .t.  . E     :
       1  IN   OUT
NOTEi [MEAN)  IS DEFINED AS:
            X
      THE MtAN FOR X PAYS USING Y-HUUk
                                                                                                                                         71
                                                                                                                                         72

-------
DAILY SUMMARY OF RESULTS
LOCATION! RICKENBACKER AFH i960
DATE! 3- 5-60
TIME
0
100
aoo
300
400
1 	 500 	
600
700
• DO
900
1000
1104
1200
1300
1500
1600
^ 170ft
7 1800
-01900
CO 200O
2100
2200
• AVERAGES
X Or DATA
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MEAN
STO.OEV.
I STD.OEV.
LOAD E E
IN
67. 4.859
67. 4.673
ft1. 5.f1f '
67. 5.011
67. b.051
61. 5.079
61. 5.021
81. 5.006
106. 5.143
106. 5.063
104. 4.936
106. 5.206
105. 5.290
III. *.?"
111. 5.766
111. 5.493
111. 5_.S47
110. 5.461
117. 5.564
Itfc. *.M*
110. 5.727
117. 5.774
117^ _i*75/
24. 24. 24
100T IOOT 100
81. 4.659
117. 5.774
102. 5.261
13. .311
13. 5.185 36
24-HOUR REMOVAL EFICIENCY USING
i
CMEANJ E , E ? «»i,9<>3«;
1 IN OUT
t
NOTE: IMEANJ
X
THE MKAN
L
r~ 	
i
IS DEFINED AS:
FOR X DAYS USING

EFF
OUT
.210 95.7
.196 95.9
.312 93.6
.353 92.9
.34U 93.3
.336 93.4
.306 93.9
.310 93.6
.300 94.2
.569 66.6
.469 90.5
.370 92.9
.454 91.4
.365 99.2
.743 67.1
.874 64.1
.610 69.0
.429 92.1
.560 90.0
.«•>} 92.0
.460 92.0
.469 91.9
.498 91.4
24.
. too.
.198 84.064
.874 95.931
,430 91.947
.159 2.668
.891 2.923


Y-HUUH AVERAGES ' . 	
	 	
i ^
2
3
4
7
10
II
If
13
14
18
16
17
18
20
21
22
23
24
23
26
27
28
t*
JO
31
32
33
34
33
36
37
38
39
4O
41
42
43
44
49
46
47
48
40
90
81
32
93
94
99
96
97
98
80
60
6t
62
63
04
e6
68
6tl
7O
71
72
7J
74
73
V

-------
        DAILY  SUMMARY  OF  RESULTS
        LOCATION:  RICKENBACKEK AFB 1980
        OATEJ   3-  6-so
   TIME        LOAD     E        E       EFF
                         IN      OUT
0
too
200
300
400
	 	 S.g.o_.._.._ .:.
600
700
800
900
1000
... LJOO
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
1700
>1«00
^]1«00
I&2000
2100
2200
2300
105.
105.
ID'S,
105.
105.
.185...-.
105.
105.
U«,
121.
121.
12J.
115.
131.
111.
131.
134.
125.
115.
115.
US.
112.
11*.
._ J15.
5.462
5.S70
S.««4
5. 570
5.439
5,t8(J
5.566
5.642
5.1.21
5.706
5.655
6.2.29.
5.895
5.609
5.132
5.212
5.195
5.40£
5.300
5.359
5-35B
5.309
5.321
5.229
.459
.300
T1«Q
.424
,«59
..<«ai
.462
.491
,507
.550
.389
.194
.208
.755
T71S
.700
.634
.435
.531
.639
.5fll
.540
.495
.510
91.6
94.6
9?. 9
92.4
91.6
91.2
91.7
91.3
91.0
90.5
93.1
97.0
96.5
86.5
flfc.2
86.6
87.8
91.9
90.0
88.1
89., 1
89.8
90.7
.90.3. 	
• AVERA6E5        24.   24.     24.     24.
I OF DAT*	100.  100.	LOJL*.	LOO^	
MINIMUM          105.    5.195    .188  86.225
MAXIMUM          134.    6.229    .755  96.985
                                                                                                                                            T
                                                                                                                                            10
                                                                                                                                            II
                                                                                                                                            \Z
                                                                                                                                            II
                                                                                                                                            14
                                                                                                                                            IB
                                                                                                                                            X
                                                                                                                                            21
                                                                                                                                            12
                                                                                                                                            2]
                                                                                                                                            24
                                                                                                                                           " J5
                                                                                                                                            It
                                                                                                                                            27
                                                                                                                                            2.
                                                                                                                                            31
                                                                                                                                            31
                                                                                                                                           ' S3
                                                                                                                                            >4 -
                                                                                                                                            3»
                                                                                                                                           . 2S
                                                                                                                                            37
                                                                                                                                            30 •
                                                                                                                                           ' 41
                                                                                                                                            42
                                 .495  90,924                                                     _		48
9TO.OEV.          10.     .241    .143   2.787                                                                                              '"I
I 8TO.OEV.         a.    4.177  2t.«7«   3.065
24-HOUR REMOVAL  EFICIENCY USING                                                                                                            "
       1
?HEANJ   E_   i  E      t  91,00dt	"*
       1  IN  OUT
NOTE:  IMEAN)   IS  DEFINED AS:
             X
       THE ME.AN FOR  X  (JAYS USING Y-HOUH  AVtKAGtS
                                                                                                                                            07
                                                                                                                                            aa

-------
              DAILY  SUMMAKV OF RESULTS
LOCATION: RICKENSACKEK AFH 19(
DATE! 3- 7-60
TIME
0
100
y ..l?«ft_
1 1600
0 1900
01 2oaa
2100
2200
	 2300 	
9 AVERA6ES
I OF DATA
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MEAJL
3TD.DEV.
X STO.DEV.
LOAD
92.
92.
92.
92.
92.
90.
90.
90.
l?°.
120.
127.
125.
122.
122.
u*.
lie.
105.
lUJ^
100.
99.
»7r
96.
94.
... -?-5A
24.
100,
90.
127.
104.
13.
13.
E E
IN
5.371"
5.697
5i5»l
5.376
5.334
.. 5.540
5.644
5.790
5.fr*a
5.791
5.691
5..36V
4.938
4.616
aTfci«
4.507
4.276
.. .1.070 .
4.055
4.014
4.0*4
OUT
.455
.576
.571
.624
.511
.636
.563
.500
-^fc&O.
.526
.545
.621
.465
.205
*L93
.160
.093
.133
.063
.074
.077
3.959 .050
3.945 .005
_ 1,93ft .Vb6
24. 24.
100. 100.
3.936
5.791
4.916
.720
14.6«1 66
.050
.636
^150.
.233
.621
24-HOUR REMOVAL EFICIENCr USING
1
                                             EFF
                                                                                                                                                7
                                                                                                         	.  _  _. .  .	 .. .	•
                                             91.5
                                              69.9
                                             -«9,J-
                                              06.4
                                             24.
                                            LfiO,. ______
                                             66.402
                                             96.741
3.959

                                                                                                  91
                                                                                                  32
                                              4.236
               E  i.E     ?
             1  IN   OUT

     	JT				
      NOTE:  IMEANJ  is DEFINED AS:
                  i
            THE M£AN FOR I OATS US!NG  Y-HUUK  AVfWAG£S
L...
                                                                                                  II
                                                                                                                                                S«
                                                                                                  87

-------
         DAILY SUMMARY OF RESULTS
         LOCATIONS RICKENBACKER AFH 1980
         OATEI   3- 8-8o
    TIME
            LOAD
                         IN
       0
     too
     200
89.
82.
       4.059
       4.17*
               OUT

               .066
               .076
     300
     400
     500
     60 0
     700
82.
89a
89.
89.
      3.944
      3.970
              «*•««»
              «•*«*»
                       EFF
                                     98.4
                                     98.2
                                   ... 98»5_
                                    «»«**
                                    *»«**
     900
    1000
    itoo
    1200
    1300
    i«OQ
122.
122.
                    4.275  *»»»»»   *«»»«
                    4.566  ***«•*   00*0*
                    4,731  Minim * ___ MHMtM-
                    4.747  «••««*   »»»0*
                    4.834  •»*•«*   «»«*«
             126.
             119.
    1SOO
    1600
             115.
             104.
       4.969  000000
       4.845  000000  0*000
      JUAfcS	tMMMtM	IUI«JfJL
       5.168    .067   98.7
1800
1900
2000
                     .
                 106.
                 108.
                 109.
       5.168
       5,028
       4.943
       4.765
       4.628
                .026
                • "33
                .141
                .221
                       99.5
                       99. 3_
                       97.1
                       95.4
    2100
    2200
	2300._

 * AVERAGES
 1 OF DATA
             111.
             112.
       4.584
       4.444
                .296
              24.  24.
             100. IOQT
              12.
                       93.5
                       94.4
                       12.
                               JUU _______ 50»_..
 MINIMUM
 MAXIMUM
 HE AN
 STO.OEV.
 X STO.DEW.
              82.   3.944     .026  93.498
             126.   5.168     .298  99.502
            .105,	m.592.	fgjioiL  attune
              15.     .387   *«*««*  *»*HHM
              15.   6*438   »««••»  »»»»*»
 24-HOuR REMOVAL EFICIENCY USING
        t
 [MEAN!    6  i__E	
        1  IN   OUT
 NOTES  [MEAN)   IS DEFINED ASS
             X
		THE MEAN f.0.8 X. D*I5 USING Y-HOUH  AVERAGES
                                                                                                                         12
                                                                                                                         23
                                                                                                                         24
                                                                                                                        " 23
                                                                                                                         20
                                                                                                                         27
                                                                                                                         26
                                                                                                                                           31
                                                                                                                                           32
                                                                                                                         42
                                                                                                                         43
                                                                                                                          46
                                                                                                                          47
                                                                                                                          46
                                                                                                                                           DO
                                                                                                                                           5»
                                                                                                                                       62
                                                                                                                                       • 3
                                                                                                                                           66
                                                                                                                                           67
                                                                                                                                           69
                                                                                                                                           70
                                                                                                                                           74
                                                                                                                                           79

-------
DAILY SUMMARY OF RESULTS
LOCATION! R1CKENBACKER
OATEI 3- 9-80
TIME
0
100
20A
300
400
500. 	 	
600
700
• 00
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
^ 1199
1 1800
0 1900
-o aooo
2100
2200
iJOJL 	 	 _ .
0 AVCRA6E8
X Or DATA
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MEAN
STO.OEV.
X STO.DEV.
24-HOUR REMOVAL
1
[MIAMI E f E
1 IN
r
LOAD E
IN
110. .415
118. .448
125. .790
122. .918
110. .769
120. .626
118. .786
119. 5.059
120. 5.188
UJ. 5.296
124. 5.165
124. 5.283
111. «TP«fc
110. 5.202
103. 5.115
98. .886
103. .862
107. .644
104. .615
105. 4.637
24. 24.
100, 100.
98. 4.425
126. 5.29b
114. 4.880
». .272
8. 5.972
AFB I960
E
OUT
.252
.198
.287
.221
.190
.192
000000
•00000
008000
000000
.264
.230
.133
000000
000000
000000
000000
ttttttt
10.
4ST
.133
.287
000000
000000
000000
EFICIENCY USIN6
OUT
NOTE! (MEAN) IS DEFINED AS:
X
THE MEAN fan x. CAYS USJN
,
t
,i
i.
:i

V • "' 1 V

EFF
94.3
95.6
94.0
95.5
95.9
95.9
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
94.9
95.5
97.4
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
10.
93.915
97.356
000000
000000
000000




""" 	 1






27
28
t*
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
4O
41
42
43
44
45
4C
47
48
49
5O
91
52
83
94
95
96
57
98
BO
eo
61
62
63
64
69
66
67
66
69
7O
71
72
73
74
75

-------
DAILY SUMMARY
OF RESULTS
LOCATION! RICKENBACKEK AFB i9«o
DATE: 3-10-00
TIME LOAD
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
• 00
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
a> ±700
i laoo
-J 1900
00 2000
2100
2200
2300
* AVERAGES
X OF DAT*
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MEAN
9TD.DEV.
X STD.OEV.
24-HOUR REMOVAL
1
(MEAN) E e E
1 IN
116.
118.
_iet»_
125.
122.
lie..
120.
lie.
117,
114.
in.
92,
92.
92.
96.
96.
96.
. 97..
97.
99.
97-
96.
100.
24.
100-
92.
126.
12.
11.
E
IN
.565
.600
.521
.506
.572
«. 70»
5.017
5.049
S.Ob!
5.275
5. 046
4*303
4.334
4.257
4.307
4.204
.4.210
4. 256
4.266
4.407
4.529
4.657
4,631
24.
100.
4.204
5.275
4,581
.310
6.765
E
OUT
000000
******
000000
0*0000
******
.052
.066
.111
.079
.074
.077
.077
.075
!o79
.119
.256
.303
15.
h3.
.052
.362
00000ft
******
******
EFICIENCV USING
: 000000X
OUT
tFF
00000
00000
00000
0*000
00000
99.0
98.7
97.6
98.2
96.3
98.2
98.2
97.8
96.1
97.2
95,7
94.4
93.5
92.2
15.
63,
92.190
99.021
000***
******


NOTEt (MEAN] IS DEFINED AS:
X
THE MEAN FOR X UAYS USING Y-HUUH AVt«AGtS . 	

2
3
4
B
7
10
tl
12
13
14
IB
IB
17
IB
IB
20
21
22
23
24
29
2.
27
2B
t*
3O
31
32
33
34
39
37
M
3»
40
41
42
43
44
49
4«
47
48
40
90
91
92
93
94
99
96
87
90
9fi
60
ei
63
61
0a
C7
«a
a«
7O
71
72
73
74
79

-------
DAILY SUMMAHV OF RESULTS
LOCATION! RICKENBACKER AFH 1980
OATEI 3-ii-eo
TIME
0
too
20A
300
400
50fl 	 	
600
700
AOO
900
1000
	 Il«0
1200
1300
1400
1SOO
1600
	 _> 1700 _
i laoo
0 1900
vo 2000
2100
2200
2300
« AVERA6ES
X OF DATA
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MEAN
STD.DEV.
X STO.DEV.
24-HOUR REMOVAL
1
	 WIM1_ ._E... «_J
1 IN
Y
LOAD E E
IN OUT
75. .682 .368
75. .69* .429
7«. .*•• .«?•
75. .704 .409
80. .763 .264
fltU 	 4.B5U .156
80. 5.043 .124
80. 5.002 ••*••*
1". *.??* MUM HUM
115. 5.399 *»»•«*
114. 5.199 «*«««0
. ll.S*_. .5..U69 ,bl<»
131. 5.184 .224
127. S.329 .122
1J1T *-,»*• ,^«»
131. 5.249 .186
113. ***•«« «*««*«
110. •»*»«* »•*»»»
112. 4.991 »**•«*
US. 5*465 *«***«
11*.. .«.1>4 ••••««
113. 4.993 •**»**
109. 4.854 *«««««
110. 4.670 ******
24. 22. 12.
100. *2. 10.
75. 4,b70 .122
131. 5.465 .514
104. 5.026 ******
20. .259 MM**
19. 5.145 ******
EFICIENCY USIN6
J **M«»X
OUT
CFF
92.1
90.9
9i.0 ' ; ' •
91.3
94.5
96-8
97.5
*****
IfffUffl
*»**»
*****
«9.9
95.7
97.7
M.f
96.5
»**»*
*****
***»*
*****
MM MUM
*****
*****
*****
12.
50T
89.865
97.716
******
******
****** , ...


NOTEI tMEANJ IS DEFINED ASl
X
[HE pit«ri ruR » DAYS iiSiriS T = KUuii AVERAGES

*
>
t





r^
2
3
4
8
•
7
•
•
10
II
12
11
14
IB
18
IT
l>
l»
20
21
22
U
24
29
2B
27
28
S>
JO
31
32
S3
34
33
M
37
38
38
4O
41
42
43
44
49
48
47
48
4*
SO
Bl
82
B3
B4
BB
B8
B7
B8
BB
8O
81
82
83
84
03
68
B7
68
60
7O
71
72
73
74
7B
V

-------
DAILY SUMMARY OF RESULTS

LOCATION: RICKENBACKER AFB 1900
DATE! 3-12-00
TIME
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
TOO
•00
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
^1000
02000
2100
2200
2300
• AVERAGES
X OF DATA
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
3TD.OEV.
X STD.OEV.
LOAD E E
IN OUT
106. MMMMMM MMMMMM
106. ****** MMMMMM
106. MMMM.MM HIM* MM
106. MMMMMM MMMUMM
106. MMMMMM MMMMMH
.1U4. HMMMMM MMMMMM
106. MMMMMM MMMMMM
106. ****** MMMMMM
12S- 4»-40fc MMMMMM
137. 3.540 MMMUMM
142. 4.267 MMMMMM
142,_ 4,282. MMMMMff
132. 4.551 IMMUMM
132. MMMMMM MMMMMM
122T MMMMMM MMMMMM
I27. MMMMMM MMMMMM
136. MMMMMM MMMMMM
I36. .....5.2.14 MMMMMM
129. 5.670 MMMMMM
122. 5.926 MMMMMM
123. S.TTfc MMMMMM
125. 5.734 «*««««
129. 5. 041 MMMMMM
124. 5.093 MMMUMM
24. 12. 0.
100. SO. 0.
106. 2.506 MMMMMM
142. 5.926 .UOO
13. MMMMMM MMMMMM
11. ****** ******
EFF
««««*
MUM MM
MMMMM
MMMMM
#/»»»»
««««*
««««*
Htttttt*
MMMMM
MMMMM
MM***
MMMMM
MMMM*
MaMMM
MOHMM
MMMMM
MMMM*
MMMM*
MHMMM
0.
0.
MMMMMtt
.000
«MMM*M
******
******
24-HOUR REMOVAL EFICIENCV USING
1
(MEAN1 E • E I .OOOX
1 IN
NOTE! (MEAN1
X
THE MEAN



OUT
IS DEFINED AS!
FQR X DAYS USING Y-HUl







i
2
3
4
a
7
a
10
1 1
11
14
ia
16
17
IS
IB
20
21
22
23
24
26
27
26
10
31
32
33
14
3B
36
37
4O
41
42
43
44
49
46
47
46
40
90
91
92
63
84
69
B6
37
aa
aa
60
61
62
63
64
83
66
67
68
68
7O
71
72
73
74
7B

-------
DAILY SUMMARY OF RESULTS
LOCATIONS RICKENBACKER
DATES 3-13-60
TIME
0
100
aaa
300
, 400
i 500
', 600
i 700
COO
900
1000
.._. 	 1100 	
1200
1300
I can
1500
1600
^1-7 9 9
•flBOO
001900
Maaaa
2100
2200
2300
* AVERA6C8
X OF DATA
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MEAN
STD.DEV.
* STD.DEV.
LOAD E
IN
106. 5.699
106. 5.696
10«. S.lfl*
108. 4.906
106. 4.645
106. 1.280
108. 4.306
108. 4.606
111. «,««fl
129. 4.481
125. 4.823
	 127. #»#»#»
128. 5.082
128. 5.011
IPI , V . « <
116. 5.097
120. 5.017
120. «,97U
123. 5.035
123. 4.949
121. ft.AT*
130. 4.975
131. 4.936
JL1 !.._.. 4. 9 9 9
24. 23.
ioar 9fc.
io6. 4.ae6
131. 5.696
120, 4.924
9. .355
8. 7.205
AFB I960
E
OUT
••*«««
**«»•«
««••*#
*«***#
**0*0*
«««•««
.231
.354
,*?^
.045
.128
*«».«•»
.565
.574
. S^fl
.561
.5oe
.505
.461
.421
,SOfc
.505
.634
.549
17.
Jl.
.045
.634
«**»*«
*»*•««
*«**•*
24-HOUR REMOVAL EFICIENCV USING
i
IMEAMJ.- t , i ? m»m
1 IN OUT
i _____ 	 _ _._ 	
NOTE! (MEAN)
X
THE ME*

IS DEFINED AS:
ft FOH Z USY8 'JS!r_G Y-M'J'JK


EFF
• *0«*
«*«** ...
|i««#p ' ' '
»»«**
**«**
*•««•
94.6
92.3
9P.7
99.0
97.3
«0«0»
08.9
66.5
09.?
69.0
90.0
89.8
90.6
91.5
«9Tfc
69.6
87.1
S9.0
17.
»U
67.132
96.99b
*tt»»*M
*U*U»*
«*»•«*


ftVERAGtS . 	 	 __
	
pk
2
3
4
•
•
7
•
•
IO
11
12
13
14
IS
16
17
1*
10
20
21
22
23
24
29
26
27
16
1*
JO
31
32
33
34
39
36
37
J6
3.
4O
41
42
43
44
49
4«
47
46
4«
BO
Bl
92
B3
S4
53
96
97
50
BO
60
61
62
63
A4
65
66
67
68
69
7O
71
72
73
74
73
'V

-------
DART SUMMARY OF RESULTS
LOCATION! RICKENBACKER
DATEI 3-14-80
TIME
0
too
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
•fisoo
0)1900
(02000
2100
2200
2300
* AVERAGES
1 OF DATA
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
STO.OEV.
X STO.OEV.
LOAD E
IN
109. 5.074
109. »««*«*
J09. «««««« 	
109. »*»«**
109. «*«««•
. 109. .. »****»
109. »•»***
109. «*««•»
111. MMMMMM
141. *««««»
139. *«*««*
134, 5.J60
132. 5.219
132. 5.160
130- S.2S7
130. 5.160
112. 5.149
111... . 4.._??U
111. 5.095
109. 5.177
110. 5.|fc2
112. 5.233
134. 5.234
114. 5.254
24. 14.
109. 4.990
141. 5.360
13. *»**f»
11. «**•**
AFB 1900
OUT
.692
.570
.373
.354
.41V
.336
.256
.339
.370
.501
.355
.247
.103
.155
.147
.142
.1 1*
.117
.064
.100
24.
on.
.064
.692
.309
.163
«.704
EFF
06.4
«»«•*
«*«•«
***•»
*««»«
«»»**
«»»**
**»»*
90.1
90.4
93.1
95.2
96.4
96.9
97.1
97.2
97.7
97.0
90.0
97.9
14.
06.361
90.702
««««««
*«««»*
24-HOUR REMOVAL EFICIENQY USIN6
1
	 IMEANl.. fc i...E 	 l.ft**MX . . . . 	 	 - 	 	
1 IN OUT
Y
NOTE! IMEANI
X
THE MEAN
IS DEFINED AS:
FOR X PAYS USING Y-HUUK
AVEPAGtS 	
	 	
3
4
6
7
10
II
12
13
14
16
17
I*
2O
21
22
23
24
23
26
27
28
a
3O
32
33
34
35
37
36
3*
4O
41
42
43
44
43
46
47
46
4«
SO
81
82
83
84
93
96
37
88
BB
6O
61
62
63
4
63
66
67
6
O
1
2
3
4
3
V

-------
DAILY SUMMARY OF RESULTS
LOCATION! RICKEN8ACKEH AFU I960
OATEI 3-15-80
TIME
0
100
»OA
300
400
500
600
700
•no
400
1000
11«0
1200
1300
taOO
1SOO
1600
I IB ft. -
> 1800
0)»'»0
oj Aoao
2100
2200
2300
* AVCRACCS
X OF OAT*
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MEAN
STO.OEV.
X STO.DEV.
24-HOUR REMOVA
1
:. iMEANi g ,
1 IN
1_
NOTE: (MEAN)
X
THE MtAN
i
'
1
LOAD E E
IN
109. 5.251
104. 5.336
io«, ^.i**
113. 5.161
113. 5.020 1
111. b.017 i
112. .474
112. .457
f J1 . .Iff
121. .263
127. .195
12.7- ,.957
123. .907
123. .esi
IPO. ,01«
120. 5.106
90. 5.215
.-.JW.. .5*18^ 	
87. 5.293
90. 5.355
«1T «.2At>
88. 5.234 1
86. 5.221
01.. 5*12J»
24. 24. 24
too, too. too
86. 4.881
127. 5.382 2
107. 5.147
15. .151
14. 2.926 76
L EFICIENCV USING
E : 86,0473
OUT
IS DEFINED A3:
FOH X DAYS USING

OUT
.211
.240
.'99
.778
.929
.350
.772
.363
.9*7
.401
.386
.302
.186
.132
.3*2
.635
.744
.434
.710
.766
.Q^O
.014
.989
.B9b
•
Cl32
.358
^iifl7_
.527
.731

tFF
96.0
94.6
«0.7
84.9
61 .6
53. D
B4.5
92.6
«*.*
92.4
92.6
93^9
96.2
97.3
as. A
87.6
»5.7
08.2
86.6
85.7
A? •
80.6
01. 1
02. 5
24.
100.
53.005
97.290
0b.b38
10.466
12.081


Y-HUUK AVtMAGts .._.._.


•^





ZA
t*
30
JJ
34
35
36
37
M
3*
4O
41
42
43
44
49
46
47
46
46
SO
91
92
S3
94
99
ee
57
58
BO
60
61
62
63
A4
t*
06
6?
::
7O
71
72
"*J
74
79
V

-------
DAILY SUMMARY OF RESULTS

LOCATION! RICKENBACKEH AFB 1980
DATE! 3-16-80
TIME LOAD E t
IN OUT
0 101. 5.043 .831
tOO 109. 5.143 1.117
200 109. «,PAO l.UOO
300 98. 5.407 .717
400 101. 5.261 .762
_.... 	 500 103. 5..2JJ .637
600 103. 5.184 .459
700 103. 5.225 .525
ADA 104. S,PIS Tin«
900 105. 5.20U .374
1000 105. 5.294 .399
,1100 	 103. 5. £45 .ill
1200 103. 5.255 .385
1300 104. 5.284 .259
1400 106,. 5.24% -&41
1500 106. 5.145 .080
1600 90. 5.180 .863
^ HP? 	 	 	 .89»__ 5^280 ,689
•f 1800 88. 5.280 .852
00 fOO 92. 5.325 .948
its. 2000 90. 5.225 1.059
2100 89. 5.170 .930
2200 89. 5.125 .306
2300 90t 5^137 ,190
• AVERAGES 24. 24. 24.
Z OF DATA 100. 100. 100,.
MINIMUM 88. 5.093 .190
MAXIMUM 109. 5.407 1.117
MEAN 99, 5^227 ^6.49
STO.DEV. 7. .072 .287
X 8TO.OEV. 7. 1,387 44.i49
24-HOUR REMOVAL EFICIENCY U3ING
1
fMEANJ _t j E ' 87.59Q?
1 IN OUT
EFF
83.7
78.3
I9,JL
86.7
05.6
B7.8 .
91.1
89.9
-94^1. ....._.....
92.8
92.5
94.0
92.7
95.1
8*>,a
82.9
83.3
67.0
83.9
62.2
• Orl
62.0
94.0
96.3
24.
100T
78.289
96.296
87.591
5.506
6.287

•
NOTEt IMEAN) IS DEFINED AS:
X
THE MfcAN FOR X DAYS USING Y-HUUR AVERAGES




[^
2
3
4
a
6
7
•
•
to
1 1
17
13
14
IB
It
17
IB
1*
20
21
22
21
24
23
26
27
26
X»
3O
31
32
33
34
39
3«
37
38
30
4O
41
41
43
44
43
46
47
46
4»
BO
Bl
B2
B3
B4
BB
B6
07
B6
B«
BO
Bl
B2
63
64
63
66
67
68
BO
70
71
72
73
74
78
V

-------
DAILY SUMMARY OF RESULTS
LOCATION: RICKENBACKER AFB i960
DATE: 3-i7-eo
TIME
0
100
300
400
	 _._. 500
600
700
1 MOO
900
1000
HOP
1200
1300
1100
1500
1600
>i7go
1 1800
001900
^2000
2100
2200
2300
• AVERAGES
I OF OAT*
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MEAN
: STO.DEV.
* STD.DEV.
24-HOUR REMUV
1
WE.MH-. E .
1 IN
NOTE: (MEAN)
X
LOAD E E EFF
IN OUT
90. 5.011 .209 95.8
94. 5.113 ^ .502 90.2
98. 5.168 .996 80.7
99. 5.111 1.036 79.7
9fl. 	 5.086 1.004 80. 3
100. 5.345 1.170 78.1
100. 5.386 1.024 81.0
106. 5.265 .569 89.2
100. 4.922 .327 93.4
. 100. 4.716 .182 96.1
99. 4.967 .249 95.0
93. 5.185 .213 95.9
«*. *.*'• .'17 #*.*
91. 5.067 2.323 54.2
95. .832 .767 84.1
91. .643 .239 94,9
92. .385 .173 96.0
93. .461 .226 94.9
96. .562 .730 84.0
92. .583 .569 67.6
93. ,502 .309 93.1
24. 24. 24. 24.
100, 100, 100. |00T * •
90. 4.385 .173 54.159
106. 5.386 2.323 96.143
96. 4.935 .661 86.840
4. .316 .485 9.337
5. 6.408 73.157 10.752
AL EFICItNCV USIN6
OUT
IS DEFINED AS:
M FOR x DAYS i/i>iNG I-MUUK AVtKAGta
. 	





24
29
27
X»
SO
31
32
M
39
36
37
M
4O
41
43
44
49
4O
47
»B
40
SO
SI
92
S3
94
93
96
97
96
99
6O
61
62
63
A4
65
66
67
6
9
O
1
2
4
9
V

-------
DAILY SUMMARY OF RESULTS
LOCATION: RICKENBACKER AFB i960
DATEI 3-18-80
TIME LOAD E E
IN OUT
0 72. 4.481 .222
100 72. 4.439 .173
200 72. 4.176 ,«47
300 72. 4.379 .540
400 72. 4.421 .170
	 	 500 . ... _ 72, . 4,566 . ,11V
600 72. 4.631 .039
700 72. 4.825 .110
BOO 77. 4. 598 ,291
900 82. 4.673 .263
1000 82. 4.756 .272
1100 82. 5.048 .300
1200 82. 4.965 .239
1300 74. 4.794 .136
1400 BO. 4.696 .332
1500 80. 4.664 .354
1600 95. 4.555 1.850
1 1800 93. 4.701 .141
001900 91. 4.470 .661
CT>2000 95. 4.428 ,119
2100 93. 4.600 .048
2200 94. 4.647 .144
2300 94. 4.738 ,ii3«
9 AVERAGES 24. 24. 24.
X OF DATA 100. 100. 100, 1
MINIMUM 72. 4.376 .039
MAXIMUM 95. 5.048 1.850
. *E_AN_ 	 fig. 4,628 _,34.flL
9TD.OEV. 9. .174 .427
X 9TD.OEV. 11. 3.7*9 »«»««•
24-HOUR REMOVAL EFICIENCV USING
1
(MEAN! E , E : 9(L.490t
1 IN OUT
	 	 	 Y
NOTE! (MEAN) IS DEFINED AS:
X
THE MEAN FOR x DAYS USING Y-HUUK

EFF
95.0
96.1
. 96,6. .
87.7
96.1
97.6
99.2
97.7
93.7
94.4
94.3
94.1
95.2
97.2
92.4
59.4
69.1
97.0
85.2
99.0
96.9
95.1
24.
00.
59.383
99.168
92.446
9.364
10.129


AVERAGtS - -


a
3
4
3
7
B
10
1 1
12
13
14
IB
16
17
1*
20
21
22
23
24
23
27
211
X*
JO
31
32
33
34
33
36
37
38
39
40
4t
42
43
44
43
46
47
48
4B
SO
91
83
B4
93
36
57
98
ae
6O
61
62
63
f.4
63
66
07
66
60
70
71
72
73
74
73

-------
DAILY SUMMARY OF RESULTS
r



20
31
21
23
»4
28
30
3)
32
33
34
39
36
37
38
3O
40
42
44
43
40
47
40
49
30
91
32
33
94
33
96
N
LOCATION: RICKENBACKEH AFB i9»o
DATEI 3-19-80
TIME
0
too
300
400
500
'600
700
• DO
900
1000
HOP
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
'"f 1800
00 |900
"•J aofta
2100
2200
2300
• AVERA6E8
X OF DATA
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MEAN
STO.DEV.
X STO.OEV.
24-HOUR REMOVAL
1
(MEANJ £ , _E
1 IN
LOAD E fc
IN
76. 5.102 1
76. 5.124 2
76. 5.075
78. 4.970
76.. 4.836 .
76. 4.612
76. 4.769
100. 4.726
99. 4.535
...10.4..... 4.361
100. 4.327
99. 4.357
95, 4, 214
91. 4.077
99. 4.173
105." 4^123
105. 4.270
105. 4.255
105. 3.772
.Itt5.a.._... 1.398...
24. 24. 24
100. 100. 100
78. 3.598
105. 5.124 2
93. 4.462
12. .431
12. 9.614 96
EFICIENCY USIN6
1 90,165?
OUT
NOTE! IMEAN) IS DEFINED AS*
X
THE MEAN FOR X DATS USittG




OUT
.041
.009
.513
.529
^256
.250
.705
.760
.505
.367
.246
.191
.117
.096
.068
.090
.141
.471
.136
.1.11
•
.066
.009
*M1_
.425
.396

V — nut

EFF
79.6
60.6
64 0 '• " •*• '•.
09.9
»9.4
S2.8
94.7
94.6
05.1
63.2
06. 4
91.1
94.3
QS.S
97.1
97.6
9B.4
97.6
96.7
MT.I
68.9
96.4
96.7
24.
100.
60.801
96.353
90.632
6.251
9.104


'« AVERAGES

- •- 	 	 	
n
3
4
0
7
to
1 1
13
14
17
10
20
21
22
23
24
23
20
26
2*
30
32
33
34
39
37
Sfl
4O
4f
42
43
44
49
4€
47
40
40
9O
Bl
02
03
04
93
00
97
90
BO
00
ot
02
03
64
63
0«
07
OS
oo
70
71
72
74
79
V

-------
         17 OPERATING OATS
         SUMMAWY OF HESUL.TS
         USING 1-HOUH AVERAGES

         tQEATItlNl BICKENBACKEH  AFH 19KQ
         DATE«  3- 2-80
                                           • *
                LOAD ... E	E        tFF
                         IN      OUT
 » AVERAGES      406. 361.     261.     237.
 X OF DATA       100.  93.      64.      58.                                                                                                 „
 MINIMUM          /«..   J..596     ,«39  53.005                                         .            		   	  ••
 MAXIMUM         145.   6.229    2.356  99.166
 MEAN            loa.   «.965     .467  90.541
           	IT.
 X STO.DEV.       15.   6.410   72.894   7.596
                                                                                                                                            23
 SO-BAY  REMOVAL IFICIENCY USING	41
        i                                             -                                                                                      «
 INEANI   E  . E     I 9Q.567X                                                                                                              "
       10  til   OUT	    		[*•
             Y
.NQTE_L..LMEANJ _.IS_JBfEINIUL AS:	

  L    THE MEAN FOR X OATS USING V-HOUR AVERAGES
                                                                                                                                            M
                                                                                                                                            to
                                                                                                                                            . 5?
                                                                                                                                            03
                                                                                                                                            94

-------
17 OPERATING DAYS
SUMMAKY OF RESULTS
'. USING
• .- DATE*
_-. . DATE
^ •: 1. i»-*0
3- 3-60
3- 4-60
	 J- 5r»0 .
J. 6-60
3- 7-60
1. M.AO
3- 9-80
3-1U-60
.._ 	 _ 3-ii-eo
3-13-60
3-14-60
1-lS-ltO
3-16-60
3-17-80
. > 3rie-eo . .
m s-i»-eo
vo
• AWtBACE*.
i OF DATA
MINIMUM
	 MAX IMU_M__ 	
MEAN
8TD.DEV.
1 1TD-DCV.
24-HOUR AVERAGES
3- 2-80
LOAD. 	 £_ . . £
IN OUT
125. 5.259 .462
110. 4.966 .300
1U2... i,2dl .430
116. 5.502 .495
104. 4.916 .350
114. 4.08U *t>»nutt
107. 4.581 **«0«*
104. 5.U26 00*000
120. 4.924 *«0000
119. 00«0«0 .309
107, S.14T .fc/17
99. 5.227 .649
96. 4.935 .661
.. 0-2. 4.ti2a .346
93. 4.482 .441
17, Ifc- 11T
55. 52. 35.
82. 4.482 .308
	 IIP, i.SPi. ,b87
106. 4.965 .467
12. .287 .141
11_ 5-T«S SD.PfcS

EFF

91.3
93.8
91.9
90.9
93.4
00000
00000
67.6
66.6
92.4
90.6
ID.
32.
86.638
93.790
90.551
2.640
P-91fc
30-DAY REMOVAL EFICIENCV USING
24
(MEAN] E ,
30 IN
Y
NOTE! (MEANJ
i - *
THE MEAN

!
:
E I 90.5891
OUT

IS DEFINED AS:
FON X DAYS USING Y-HUUK AVERAGES
- -










33
aa
30
41
41
43
44
49
40
47
48
40
SO
81
ni
04
59
se
97
90
90
eo
«i
02
83
67
an
70
71
t2
74
79

-------
FKEUUENCY DISTRIBUTION
~"~ 	 LOCATION: RICKENBACKEK AFB i9eo
STARTING OATEt 3- 2-80
PARAMETER! 1-MOUH EIN. LH/MMRTU
	 PARAMETER. RANGE .....
3.000 - 3.400
3.400 - 3.800
3.800 - 4.200
4.200 - 4.600
4,600 - 5,000
5.000 - 5.400
5.400 - 5.800
5.800 » 6.200
6.200 - 6.600
6.600 - 7.000
OCCURRENCE
. FHEBUENCI 	 PEHCtNUGE
0. 0.
17.
58.
*"».
187.
42.
4.
1.
0.
4.
14.
46.
10.
0.
0.
J

HISTOGRAM

• *
••**•*•
»«» *********
•A*********************
*****

BEYOND NIN/MAX RAN6E 1.
TOTAL POPULATION 407.

•f CUMULATIVE
vQ
O LOCATION!
DATE! 3-
PARAMETER:
PARAMETER RANGE
.000 - 3.400
.000 - 3.800
•005 - 4.200
.000 - 4.600
.000 • 5.000
.000 • 5.400
.000 - 5.800
.000 - 6.200
3,000 - 6.600



DISTRIBUTION
RfCKFMBACKFfl APR I9AO
2-80
I-MUUR EIN,
LB/MMBTU
OCCURRENCE
FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
0.
3.
29.
78.
172.
401.
405.
406.
3.000 - 7.000 406.
BEYOND NIN/MAX RANBE 1.
TOTAL POPULATION



407.
..
0.
1 •
5. .
19.
42.
99.
100.
190.
100.



HISTOGRAM
*•
••*•••*•••
• •A****************** ' .••„..
A************************************************
•A************************************************
•ft************************************************
a*************************************************




s
2



20
21
22
23
24
29
28
27
2B
3O
31
32
33
34
38
38
37
30
4O
41
42
43
44
49
49
47
48
40
90
91
92
93
84
89
99
87
88
8>
9O
• 1
91
69
97
99
99
70
71
72
73
74
79
V

-------
FKtUUtNCY DISTRIBUTION
LOCATION: RICKENBACKEH
STARTING OATEI 3- 2-80
PABAUFTfBI t
-------
FREUUENCY DISTRIBUTION
LOCATIONS RICKENBACKEH
STAHTING DATE! 3- £-80
PARAMETER* 1-MQUH EOUT
AFU 1980
. LB/MMBTU . .
OCCURHEMCt
	 PARAMETER RANGE . FHEUUEJtCJL 	 PEKCtNUtE
.010 - .159 57. 17.
»!*« - .*0« 87. PS.
.308 • .457 75.
.457 - .606 64.
,60ft ..-.. .755 ... 26.
.755 - .104 14.
.904 - 1.053 11.
1,093 v 1.202 4,
i.eoa • 1.351 o.
1.351 - 1.500 0.
BEYOND MIN/MAX RANGE 6.
TOTAL POPULATION 344.
i»
7 CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION
VO
^ LOCATIONl RICKEMMACKER
aa.
19.
8.
4.
3.
1 .
0.
0.
AFB 19HO
-i

HiSIObRAM
»•••***•
*************
***********
*********
****
*•
*•




DATE: 3- 2-80
PARAMETER! 1-HOUR EOUT, LB/MMBTU
OCCURRENCE
PARAMETER RAN6E FREUUENCY PERCENTAGE
.010 - .159 57.
.010 • .308 144.
.010 - ,457 319t
.010 • .606 303.
.010 - .755 309.
.010 • .904 323.
.010 - 1.053 334.
.010 - >.au£ 338.
,010 - 1,351 338.
.010 - 1.500 33B.
BEYOND MIN/MAK ftANfiE 6.
TOTAL POPULATION 344.


17.
M.
bH.
B2.
90.
94 T
97.
98.
98.
98.


HISTOGRAM
********
A********************
A*******************************
A****************************************
•A*******************************************
*************************************«ft*t******
A************************************************
•••••A*******************************************
•A***********************************************




•\
a
i
4
5
•
7
•
•
1O
11
12
13
14
10
1.
17
IS
10
10
21
22
23
24
23
26
2T
IB
I*
JO
31
32
33
34
38
36
37
30
30
4O
41
42
43
44
49
46
47
46
40
5O
91
92
83
84
99
96
87
86
90
6O
61
62
63
64
63
•6
07
66
»»
70
71
72
73
74
78
V

-------
FHEUUENCY DISTRIBUTION
LOCATIONS RICKENBACKEH
STARTING DATES 3- 2-60
•AB.UfTfBI f.UQUB LOG
AFb 1900
OCCURRENCE.
PARAMETER RANGE FHEUUENCT HFurnyit AC;F HISTOUHAM
•2.000 - -1.762 0.
-1.564 - -1.346 3.
-1.346 - -1.128 13.
-1..L28 - -.910 ... 2J.
-.910 - -.692 36.
-.692 - -.474 79.
-.256 - -.038 53.
-.036 - .160 0.
0.
o
1.
it. **
11. ******
23. *****••••••
15. *••***•*
0.
BEYOND MIN/MAX RANGE 21.
TOTAL POPULATION 344.

•f CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION
<£>
CO LOCATIONS RICKEMACKER
DATES 3- 2-80
PARAMETERS 1-HUUR LOG

AFH 19*0
EOUT
OCCURRENCE
PARAMETER RANGE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE HISTOGRAM
-2.000 - -1.762 0.
-2.000 - -1.564 1.
-2.000 - -1,346 4,
-2.000 - -1.126 17.
-2.000 - -.910 40.
-2.000 - -.692 76,
-2.000 - -.474 157.
-2.000 - -S256 270,
-2,000 - -.038 323.
-2.000 - .160 323.
BEYOND MIN/MAX RANGE PI.
TOTAL POPULATION 3*44.
i
i
0.
0.
1. •
5. • «
12. •••••*
, 2'. *••**•*••**
46. A**********************
78, •«*•*•*••*•«•••***•*•***••*••**•••***••
94. A**********************************************,
94. A********************************************)**


r
i
I
2
3
4
8
7
IO
II
t2
13
14
II
1*
17
18
21
22
23
24
29
26
27
26
t»
SO
31
32
33
34
39
•W
37
36
4O
41
42
43
44
49
46
47
48
40
80
81
92
83
84
99
86
97
98
60
60
61
62
63
A4
ee
67
ee
60
7O
71
71
73
74
79
V

-------
FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION



0
i
2
3
4
n
7
6
9
0
1
4
0
fl
7
»
0
1
2
3
14
9
16
7
8
9
to
1
2
3
4
3
6
7
a
0
JO
it
LOCATION: RICKENBACKEH AFB I9go
STARTING DATES 3* 2-00
PARAMFTfBl 1-HOUft 1 FFFICjFNrY
OCCURRENCt
PARAMETER RANtfE FRf.UUfcNCY PERCENTAGE HISTOGRAM
60.000 * 63.990 2,
61.990 * fc7.9AO 0,
67.960 - 71.970 1.
71.970 - 75.960 0.
75,960 - 79,9bO 6.
79.950 - 63.940 15.
B3.940 - 67.930 3a.
87.930 • 91.920 A4.
9l.9aO • 95.910 115.
95.910 • 99.900 0.
BEYOND MIN/MAX RANGE 79.
TOTAL POPULATION 334.
Hjy
7 CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION
vO
*» LOCATIONI RICKENBAQKER
1.
o.
0.
0.
2. *
«. ••
10. *•••*
?5. ••••••**••••*
34. •«••••*••**•«»«••
0.


AFB 1980
DATE: 3- 2-ao
PARAMETER: I-HOUB x EFFICIENCY
OCCURRENCE
PARAMETER RANGE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE HISTOGRAM
60.000 • 63.990 2.
60.000 - 67.980 2.
60,000 - 71.970 3.
60.000 - 75.960 3.
60.000 • 79.9SO *.
60.000 • AS. 940 24.
60.000 - 67.930 56.
60.000 - 91.930 140.
60,000 • 95,910 8S5.
60.000 - 99.900 2b5.
BEYOND MIN/MAX RANGE 79.
TOTAL POPULATION 334.
1.
1.
1.
1.
3. •
7, •***
17. •»••»*»•
42. A********************
76. *••**••«*••»*•••*••«•••****»»••••*•••«
76. **************************************
-
2
J
14
A
A
a
3
4
6
7
9
10
12
13
14
IB
te
17
16
IB
2O
21
22
23
24
23
26
27
28
t»
30
31
32
33
34
33
36
37
30
39
4O
41
42
43
44
43
46
47
48
4ft
90
91
92
03
94
99
96
S7
96
90
6O
61
62
63
ru
63
66
67
ea
6ft
70
71
72
73
74
79

-------
FREUUENCV DISTRIBUTION
LOCATION: RICKENBACKEK
STAHTING DATE! 3- 2-80
•tARAMFTFRI l«tHOUB LQ6(

AFB 19ttO
t FFFICIENrVl
OCCURRENCE
PARA.ME.IE.K RANGE FHEUIIEJUCJ . PERCENTAGE HISTOGRAM
.700 - .730 1.
.760 - .790 3.
.790 - .820 0.
	 .820. .-. .850 ...... 1. .
.890 - .880 0.
.880 - .910 12.
T4IO • T«J«O \\ ,
.940 - 1.970 131.
.970 - 2.000 0.
0.
o.
t.
0.
0.
0.
4. •*
4. *****
39. •***••**•****•**•**•
0.
BEYOND MIN/MAX RANGE 154.
TOTAL POPULATION 33*.

, CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION
ID
tn LOCAT10M1 RICKEMACKEa

AFR 1480
DATE: 3- 2-so
PARAMETER! 1-HOUR LOG(X EFFICIENCY)
OCCURRENCE
PARAMETER RANGE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE HISTOGRAM
.700 - .730 1.
.700 - .760 2.
.700 - .790 5.
.700 - .820 5.
.700 - .850 6.
.700 - r««0 ft,.
.700 - .910 18.
.700 - .940 <|9.
	 1,700..- .?ZO. .. . 10Q.
1.700 - 2.000 180.
BEYOND MIN/MAK RANGE 1S4T
TOTAL POPULATION 334.


0.
1.
1. •
1. •
2. •
5. ••*
IS. *••••••
S
-------
FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION
LOCATION: RICKENBACKEK AFB i960
STARTING DATES 3- 2-80
PARAMFTER1 1-HOUR 100-X EFFlr.ItNCV
PARAMEJfR RANGE
.010 - 4.009
4.004 . ft. 00ft
e.ooa - 12.007
12.007 - 16.006
l*i.Q96 .-. £0.005.
20.00S - 24.004
24.004 • 28.003
2ft. 001 • 12.002
32.002 - 36.001
36.001 • 40.000
OCCURRENCE
FREUUENCT PERCENTAGE
74. 22.
114, 1«,
87.
32.
	 .15 a- 	
6.
0.
1.
0.
0.
26.
10.
	 «. 	 	
2.
0.
0T
0.
0.
HISTOGRAM
**•*****••*
.. *. • • « t* * *.* * *.**
***•****•*••«
*****
**
*


**•• . ' ...



BEYOND MIM/MAX RAN6E 5.
TOTAL POPULATION 334.

7 CUMULATIVE
CO
CT> LOCATION!
DATEl 3-
PARAMETERJ
PARAMETER RANGE
.010 • 4.009
.010 - 8.008
,010 - 12,007
.010 - 16.006
.010 • 20.005
.010 • 24.004
.010 - 28.003
.010 - 32.002
.010 - 36.001
.010 - 40.000
BEYOND. tUN/_MJx_JtAM
TOTAL POPULATION


DISTRIBUTION
•ICKEMBACKeB

AFB 14AO




2-80
1-HOUR 100-X EFFICIENCY
OCCURRENCE
FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
74.
188.
275.
307.
32*,
12ft.
328.
329.
329,
329.
6E_. 5.. 	
334.

22.
56.
82.
92.
• . *•'• . 96.
9A.
98.
99.
99,
99.


HISTOGRAM

*••**•**•**
A***************************
A*********************.*******************
A************
••••A********
_**.**i*t ******
****••**•***•
*************
*************
.A*******************************
****•***************•**•***•**•*•*•
# ••••«• * • * * 1 1 * •. •* n t • » * • t !••••••• * * * « ....
a***********************************
•.A*********************************
•A**********************************
A************************************************




i^



20
21
22
23
24
23
2«
27
28
t»
10
31
32
13
34
3B
*4
37
31
3*
*O
41
42
43
44
49
4«
47
4B
4P
9O
91
92
93
84
99
9Q
S7
90
90
•0
61
.2
63
f>4
A3
ee
O7
ea
ee
70
71
72
73
74
73
V

-------
FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION
LOCATION! RICKENBACKER AFB I960
STARTING DATE! 3- 2-80
...... »>*BAM£Tf»i i. unite mcfian.* ccctr icur v i
... PARAMETER RANBE
•£.000 • -1.640
-1.280 - -.9i>0
-.920 - -.560
-TS60 - -.200
-.200 - .160
.160 • .520
.880 • 1.240
1.240 - 1.600
OCCURRENCE
FHFUUtNCY HFHCFUT.C-E M1STO«B»M
2V>-'. •:- #•
0.
0.
.. _. 	 1.... 	 	
9.
135.
0.
0.
Oj " ' ' ' '
0.
0.
.. 0.
3. •
14. ••*••»•
40. *•*»•••**•*••«•»*•**
0.
BEYOND MIN/MAK RANGE 22.
TOTAL POPULATION 334.

1 CUMULATIVE
vO
DATE! 3-
PARAMETERS
PARAMETER RANGE
-2.000 - -1.640
-2.000 - -1.200
-2.000 • -.920
-2.000 - -.560
-2.000 - -.200
DISTRIBUTION
2-80
1-HOUR LOGC100-S

EFFICIENCY)
OCCURRENCE
FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE HISTOGRAM
0.
0.
0.
0.
i.
-2.000 - .520 57.
=2.000 » .880 177.
_-2tOp.O. .-. . 1..240 	 „_ 312. .
-2.000 - 1.600 312.
AEVOMfk MtN/HAK RiftC* 22.
TOTAL POPULATION

it
)
s
T .
334.

0.
0.
0.
0.
3* •
|7. •****«**•
53. -****»««««*»»»»***««««**«•
93. ***••****••*••*«*•*•••*••••»*•*«•••••••••••••••


	 - 	 	
f\





»
28
27
in
t*
JO
33
34
38
37
38
38
4O
41
42
49
44
48
48
47
48
48
9O
81
82
83
84
99
98
97
98
OB
eo
81
82
83
fU
8
8
8
8
6
•
79
V

-------
FREUUENCY DISTRIBUTION
LOCATION! RICKENBACKEK
STARTING DATES 3- 2-ttO
PARAMETER! 21-HOUH EIN.
AFB 1900
Ltt/MMHTU 	
OCCURRENCE
PARAMETER RANGE FREQUENCY PEKCtNlAGE HISTOGRAM
3.000 - 3.400 0.
1.400 - J.,800 0,
3.800 - 4.200 0.
4.200 - 4.600 3.
4,600 - 5.000 6.
5.000 • 5.400 6.
5.400 - 5.800 1.
5.800 - 6.200 0.
6.200 - 6.600 0.
6.600 - 7.000 0.
BEYOND MIN/MAX RANGE 0.
TOTAL POPULATION 16.
*to
1 CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION
vO
0° LOCATION! RICKENRACKEa
DATE! 3- 2-80
PARAMETER! 24-HOUR EIN,
0.
0.
0.
19. *********
30. *******************
38. **••**•*****»*•«**•
6. **•
0.
0.
0.


AFB 1980
LB/MMBTU
OCCURRENCE
PARAMETER RANGE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE HISTOGRAM
.000 - 3.400 0.
.000 • 3.800 0.
tOOO • 4,200 0.,
.000 " 4.600 3.
.000 - 5.000 9,
.000 • 5.400 IS.
.000 - 5.800 16.
.000 - 6.200 16.
3.000 - 6,600 16,
3.000 - 7.000 16.
BEYOND M1N/MA1 RAJUUL 0.
TUTAL POPULATION 16.
0.
0.
0,
19. •**«***•*
56. is************************** . ., -• .
44. ***•****•***•*•***•*•**•*•***•••••*••**•••****•
100. A****************.********************************
100. ••***»»*****•«*••«*•«*••****•**•*•****•***»****•••
100, *********** A**************************************
100. ***••*****»»***»•»*•***•*•*»*****••*•*••**•**•**•*
. . 	
.
1




20
2!
22
23
24
23
26
27
t*
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
36
4O
41
42
44
43
46
47
4B
4»
30
51
52
63
54
33
36
37
38
SB
60
61
62
63
63
66
C7
68
ee
7O
72
3
4
3
A

-------
FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION
LOCATION! R1CKENBACKEH
STARTING DATEl 3- 2-00
PARAMETER RANGE
.500 - .535
.*« . -*TO
.570 - .605
.60S - .640
. ..6.4.0 ..- . ...675
.675 - .710
.710 - .745
-I« • TT«0
.700 - .015
.815 - .050
AFU 1900
flu
OCCURRENCE
FKEUUENCT ... PERCENTAGE
:• •
0.
o.
	 	 «.. .
7.
5.
A.
0.
0.
°»
0.
0.
25.
44.
31.
o.
o.
o.

HISTOGRAM

ftftfi********** 	
•*******••*••••••*•**•
••**•••**•*•••*•

BEYOND MIN/MAX RANGE 0.
TOTAL POPULATION 16.

7 CUMULATIVE
v£>
vo i nr*Tt nut
DATE: 3-
PARAMETER:
PARAMETER RANGE
.500 • .535
.500 • .570
*5J>0 - _.605
.500 • .640
.500 - .675
.500 • .710
.500 - .745
.500 - .700
.500 - ,815
.500 - .850
•EVONO HIM/MAX BAM
TOTAL POPULATION




DISTRIBUTION
2-80
24-HOUH LOG
AFH fQAO
EIN
OCCURRENCE
FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
0.
0.
9.
0.
«.
11.
16.
16.
16.
IfiE 0,
16.


0.
0.
0.
0.
25.
too.
100.
100.
100.





HISTOGRAM

*************
•*••••••••••••*•••*••••**••*••*•••
A*************************************************
•o************************************************
*«******»***»»*****«****•************•*********•••
••A***********************************************

'


1 i
2
3
4
a
7
1O
11
It
13
14
IB
17
It
18
TO
21
22
23
24
29
30
31
32
33
34
39
37
30
4O
41
42
43
44
49
48
47
48
40
90
9t
92
83
84
89
88
87
88
80
eo
61
«2
63
64
66
67
ee
eo
7O
71
72
73
74
78

-------
FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION
LOCATION; RICKENBACKER AFB I9eo
STARTING DATE! 3- 2-80
PARAMETERS 24-HOUR EOUT. LR/MMHTU
OCCURRENCE
PARAMETER RANGE FREQUENCY PEHCtNTAUE HISTOGRAM
.010 - .159 0,
.159. • ,30« 0T
.306 - .457 6.
.«S7 - .606 2.
«*0fc - .755 _lm
.755 - .900 0.
.904 - 1.053 0.
1.051 - 1.202 0,
1.202 - 1.351 0.
1.351 - 1.500 0.
0.
DT
55. *••»•«***••••»•***•••••*•«•
16. •***•**•*
27. **•******«*«*«
0.
0.
QT
0.
0.
BEYOND MIN/MAX RAN6E 0.
TOTAL POPULATION 11.
It*
7 CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION
H
? LOCATION! RICKFMftACHFH
w DATEJ 3- 2-80
PARAMETER: 24-HOUR EOUT

AFB |Q*0
, LB/MMBTU
OCCURRENCE
PARAMETER RANGE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE HISTOGRAM
.010 - .159 0.
.010 - .308 0.
. ,OJO.- .... .45,7 .. 6.
.010 • .606 8.
.010 • .755 11.
.010 - T904 11.
.010 - 1.053 11.
.010 - 1.202 11.
_ .010 - 1.351 11.
.010 - 1.500 11.
I
r BEYDJttt HIM/MAX ftAMfi£__ 0._
TOTAL POPULATION 11.
|
0.
0.
73. •*****•******•••****•*••*•••*•••••••
100. •********•****•**•••**•*•••«•*•*••*•***••••••••***
$00. •••**•***••••*•••••••••••*••••«•*••*•••••••*•*••*«
1UO. *••***•»••**•****•»»•*•»••*••»*•••»•*••••*«•••••••
100. •••»»«*««««*«*««*««*«««o«<»««««»«**«»«)>«»«»«m8(»t** 	 	 	 	 	 	
100. *«**•**•*•*•*»»••«••*•*«••••••»*•»•••*»*••**••«•••



1
2
3
4
a
•
7
•
a
10
1 1
12
13
14
IB
It
IT
1<
If
20
21
22
23
24
29
2>
Z7
2*
I*
30
31
32
U
34
3B
•wi
37
SB
39
40
41
42
43
44
49
46
47
48
40
90
91
92
83
84
99
SB
37
98
8B
6O
ei
02
«
f.4
6
e
e
a
7
7 \
2
3
A
9
y

-------
FREUUENCY DISTRIBUTION
LOCATION! R1CKENBACKEK AFB 19BO
STARTING OATEI 3- 2-60
•ABAUFTFBi atmunno \ fie fniir
OCCURKENCt
PARAMETER RANGE FKEUUENCf HFHONIAfiF
•2.000 - -1.782 0, 0.
• ITT«> . .1 r«lfiBi •.'"'' n.
•1.564 • -1.346 0. 0.
•1.346 - -1.128 0. 0.
-1.128 - -.910 0. 0,
-.910 - -.692 0. 0.
-.692 - -.474 2. 18.
• ,«!• « • ,.»**> »>. 55.
-.256 - -.038 3. 27.
-.038 - .180 0. 0.
BEYOND MIN/MAX RANGE 0.
TOTAL POPULATION It.

^f CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION
H
O i or*TiOMi Qirtrumtntre AFR (quo
1-1 DATE: 3- 2-eo
PARAMETtRl 24-HOUR LOG EOUT
OCCURRENCE
PARAMETER RANGE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
-2.000 - -1.782 0. 0.
-2.000 - -1.564 0. 0.
-2.000 - -I.3"
66
67
66
60
70
71
72
73
74
7B
V

-------
FREUUENCV DISTRIBUTION


LOCATION: RICKENBACKEH AFB i9eo
STARTING DATEl 3- 2-80
PARAMfTFRI 24-HOUU X EFFICIENCY
OCCURRENCE
PARAMETER RAN.GE ER.EUUEJICI PEKCLNTAGE
60.000 - 63.990 0.
41 T 990 . 67.980 AT
67.980 - 71.970 0.
71.970 - 75.960 0.
75.960 - 79.950 J>.
79.950 - 83.940 0.
63.940 - 87.930 3.
87.930 • 91.920 3,
91.920 - 95.910 4.
95.910 - 99.900 0.
0.
o.
o.
. ... 0.
0.
30.
10,
40.
0.
HISTOGRAM

•
**»***•*••*••••
****••*••***•**••*•*
BEYOND MIN/MAX RANGE 0.
TOTAL POPULATION 10.

f CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION
O LOCATtOMI BICKFMIACKFB

AFR 19110


N DATE: 3- 2-80
PARAMETERS 24-HOUR X EFFICIENCY
OCCURRENCE
PARAMETER RANGE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
60.000 - 63.990 0.
60.000 - 67.980 0.
60^000 - 71,970 0.
60.000 - 75.960 0.
60.000 - 79.950 «.
60.000 • 83.940 0-
60.000 - 67.930 3.
60.000 - 91.920 6.
60,000 - 95.9JO JO,
60.000 - 99.900 10.
BE10NQ MIN/MAX NANCE. 0...
TOTAL POPULATION 10.
i
1
I 	
T
0.
o.
o.
0.
0.
0.
30.
60.
IUO.
100.

HISTOGRAM


*******••«•****
»*» *«**•«•••***»•»»••*•••»*•«*
••A***********************************************
A*************************************************

	 	
,\
a
3
4
B
7
IO
1 1
ia
13
14
IB
I*
17
10
10
20
21
22
23
24
23
20
27
26
»
3D
31
32
34
39
M>
37
3B
30
40
41
42
43
44
49
47
4B
0
O
1
2
3
4
99
9<
37
50
90
00
*
3
ee
G7

-------
FREUUfcNCY DISTRIBUTION
* LOCATION! RICKENBACKER
* STARTING DATES 3- 2-60
AFU 1980
4
" OCCURRENCE
* P.AR.AM.tlEJl-fiANG.E 	 £REUU£J*CJf 	 PEKCtNIAtE .
7 * •
• 1.700 - 1.730 0. .
10 1.760 - 1.790 0.
" 1.790 - 1.620 0.
11 . _1^.6.a«L - .1.650...... 	 (L.
" 1.650 • 1.680 0.
]| 1.660 - 1.910 0.
16 1.940 • 1.970 6.
17 1.970 - 2.0UO 0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
?°t
60.
0.


HISTOGRAM


• .•»«.•. ••>
•A****************************
" BEYOND NIN/MAX RANGE 2.
20 TOTAL POPULATION 10.
21
12
23
" >
" "l CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION
2e H
'" 2 LOCATIDMI RICKEMBACKCQ

AFH 1980


" OATEI 3- 2-80
" PARAMETER: 24-HOUR LOGU EFFICIENCY)
3O
11 OCCURRENCE
32 PARAMETER RANGE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
33
M .700 - .730 0.
" .700 • .760 0.
M ,700 - .790 0.
37 .700 - .820 0.
38 .700 • .650 0.
1" .700 - .880 A.
40 .700 - .910 0.
!" .700 - .940 2.
" ,700 - ,970 8,
" .700 - 2.000 6.
44
•* 	 BCYQ1ULMJN/MAI HUtfiE. 2._
"| TOTAL POPULATION 10.
"
40
40
Sf!
"1
^____
^
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
20.
80.
60.

HISTOGRAM


**********
A***************************************




2
3
4
7
IO
II
12
13
14
IB
16
17
1*
ie
20
21
22
23
24
23
26
30
31
32
34
38
Ml
37
38
39
4O
41
42
43
43
46
47
48
40
SO
31
32
83
84
33
86
87
36
30
6O
61
62
63
bS
06
67
68
7O
71
72
73
74
73

-------
FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION
V


* LOCATION: RICKENBACKEH AFB I9eo
2 STAHTING DATE: s- 2-so
* PARAMETER! 28-HOUR 100-1 EFFICIENCY
4
8 OCCURRENCE:
• PARAMETER RANGE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
7
0 .010 - 4.009 0.
• 4.009 • 8.008 3.
10 8.008 - 12.007 4.
" 12.007 - 16.006 3.
" 16,0.06 - 20,005 0,
13 20.005 - 24.004 0.
" 24.004 - 28.003 0. '
"> 28.003 • 32T002 0.
'• 32.002 - 36.001 0.
17 36.001 - 40.000 0.
ia
0.
30.
«o.
30.
0. ... ....
0.
0.
o.
0.
0.
HISTOGRAM

********•**«**•*•***
***************


" BEYOND MIN/MAX RANGE 0.
10 TOTAL POPULATION 10.
21
22
23
2. >


" i CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION
26 H
" ° LOCATION! RICKENBACKER AFB 1980
» OATEI 3- 2-80
" PARAMETER: 24-HOUR loo-x
30
EFFICIENCY
11 OCCURRENCE
" PARAMETER RANGE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
33
34 .010 - 4.009 0.
39 .010 - 8.008 3.
38 .010 • 12.007 7,
37 .010 - 16.006 10.
38 .010 - 20.005 10.
38 .010 • 24.004 10.
<° .010 - 28.003 10.
" .010 - 32.002 10.
11 ,010 - 36,001 )0,
" .010 - 40.000 10.
•u
" BEYOND MIN/MAX RANGE 0.
46 TOTAL POPULATION 10.
47
46
4U
SO
91
33
33
0.
30.
70.
100.
100.
100.
100.
100.
too!


HISTOGRAM
***************
a**********************************
•A************************************************
A*************************************************
•A************************************************
••a***********************************************
**************************************************
A*************************************************
	 	


JV



20
21
22
23
24
29
2«
27
3O
31
32
33
34
39
37
30
30
4O
41
42
43
44
45
«
47
48
49
90
91
92
B3
94
99
96
57
50
99
eo
61
62
63
6
e
c
6
70
71
72
3
4
9

-------
DISTRIBUTION
f
7
a
10
i
t
j
4
9
7
O
(1
34
U
IT
U
tt
JO
11
JJ
U
IS
M
37
30
'
" LOCATION! RICKEMBACKEM
STAftTINS DATCi J- 2-fl(
pABAMfTrBt a«>nniu) Lfl£(
AFB I«»BO ,
100.* CFFICtFMFVl .
OCCURRENCE
PARAMETER RANGE FREUU£KCJf _ PERCENTAGE. _ HISTOGRAM
-2.000 - -1.640 0,
.1.A.4A . .1.2*0 • - •_'..
•1.280 - -.920 0.
-.920 - -.560 0.
. 	 T*S6fl.-- -.200 ....... 0. ...
-.200 - .160 0.
.160 - .520 0.
.680 - 1.240 7.
1.2*0 - 1.600 0.
BEYOND MIN/MAX RANGE 0.
TOTAL POPULATION 10.
'""> CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION
M
O LOCATION! R1CKEMBACKFB
01 DATE: 3- 2-eo
PARAMETERS 24-HOUR LOG(
«• M
0. • .1 •
0. '»
0.
0. . . .. . . ..
0. £
70. •••*•»••••••••••••*••••••••*••••••• "

3"
AF(* 1«*0 "
109-1 EFFICIENCY) £
4O
OCCURRENCE "
PARAMETER RANGE FRE8UENCT PERCENTAGE HISTOGRAM "
-2.000 - -1.640 0.
-2.000 - -1.260 0.
•2.000 - -.560 0.
-2.000 - -.200 0.
•2,000 - .160 t.
•2.000 - .520 0.
-2.000 - .860 3.
•2{000 - 1*240 JO,
-2.000 - 1.600 10.
•EVOND MTN/NAI RANGE 0T
TOTAL POPULATION 10.
0. «
... o! «
0. ^
ftl . n
0. 'J
30. *•••••••*•••••• „
100. ***•*••••••*••••••*•*•••••*•••••••••••••*••••••••• °
••-••-• - 	 ],„
»•
S7
aa
70
71
71
74
7»


-------