&EFK
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards
Research Triangle Park NC 27711
EMB Report 80-IBR-6
March 1980
Air
Industrial Boilers
Emission Test Report
Rickenbacker Air Force
Base
Columbus,
VOLUME I:
Summary of Results
-------
CONTINUOUS SULFUR DIOXIDE MONITORING OF
THE INDUSTRIAL BOILER SYSTEM AT
RICKENBACKER AIR FORCE BASE,
COLUMBUS, OHIO
VOLUME I
by
S. J. Howie
PEDCo Environmental, Inc.
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, Ohio 45246
Contract No. 68-02-2811
Work Assignment No. 27
PN 3333-AA
Technical Manager
Winton Kelly
Emission Measurement Branch
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
EMISSION STANDARDS AND ENGINEERING DIVISION, OAQPS
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NORTH CAROLINA 27711
June 1980
-------
DISCLAIMER
This report has been reviewed by the Emission Measurement
Branch Emission Standards and Engineering Division, Office of
Air Quality Planning and Standards, U.S. Environmental Protec-
tion Agency, and approved for publication. Approval does not
signify that the contents necessarily reflect the views and
policies of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, nor does
mention of trade names or commercial products constitute en-
dorsement or recommendation for use.
ii
-------
CONTENTS
Figures iv
Tables v
Acknowledgment x
1 Introduction 1-1
2 Summary of Results 2-1
3 Results 3-1
3.1 Performance specification tests 3-1
3.2 Continuous sulfur dioxide data 3-38
3.3 Data capture and loss 3-45
3.4 Quality assurance 3-53
3.5 Particulate and NO results 3-76
J\.
4 Process Description 4-1
4.1 Physical plant 4-1
4.2 Background information 4-5
4.3 Process control during test 4-5
5 Continuous Emission Monitoring System Description 5-1
5.1 Sampling interface 5-1
5.2 S02 monitor 5-4
5.3 02 monitor 5-4
5.4 Recorders 5-5
5.5 Calibration system 5-5
6 Procedures and calculations 6-1
6.1 Continuous S02 data computations 6-1
6.2 Performance specification testing 6-5
6.3 Determination of factors accounting for data
capture and loss periods 6-13
6.4 Quality assurance 6-15
6.5 Determination of CEM output in the field 6-18
6.6 Determination of particulate and NO
concentrations 6-19
Appendix Calibration gas certification and FGD
information A-l
iii
-------
FIGURES
Number Page
3-1 Scrubber Inlet Sampling Locations . 3-6
3-2 Scrubber Outlet Sampling Locations 3-7
4-1 R-C/Bahco Scrubbing System Flow Diagram 4-4
5-1 Sampling Locations After Modifications 5-2
5-2 Simplified Schematic of CEM 5-3
6-1 Sample Data Sheet and Equations for the
Determination of Calibration Error 6-7
6-2 Sample Data Sheet and Equations for Deter-
mination of System Response Time 6-9
6-3 Sample Data Sheet and Equations for Deter-
mination of 2-hour Zero and Calibration Drift 6-10
6-4 Sample Data Sheet and Equations for Deter-
mination of 24-hour Zero and Calibration Drift 6-12
6-5 Sample Data Sheet and Equations for Deter-
mination of System Relative Accuracy 6-14
IV
-------
TABLES
Number
3-1 Summary of Initial Performance Specification
Results for the S02 Monitor 3-2
3-2 Summary of Initial Performance Specification
Results for the O2 Monitor 3-3
3-3 Summary of Final Performance Specification
Results for the S02 Monitor 3-4
3-4 Summary of Final Performance Specification
Results for the 02 Monitor 3-5
3-5 Initial Test Results for Low-Range (Outlet)
S02 Monitor Calibration Error 3-10
3-6 Intial Test Results for High-Range (Inlet)
S02 Monitor Calibration Error 3-11
3-7 Initial Test Results for 02 Monitor Calibration
Error 3-12
3-8 Initial Test Results for Low-Range (Outlet)
Monitor 2-Hour Zero and Calibration Drift 3-13
3-9 Initial Test Results for High-Range (Inlet)
S02 Monitor 2-Hour Zero and Calibration Drift 3-14
3-10 Initial Test Results for O2 Monitor 24-Hour
Zero and Calibration Drift 3-15
3-11 Initial Test Results for Low-Range (Outlet)
S02 Monitor 24-Hour Zero and Calibration
Drift 3-17
3-12 Initial Test Results for High-Range (Inlet)
S02 Monitor 24-Hour Zero and Calibration Drift 3-18
3-13 Initial Test Results for 02 Monitor 24-Hour
Zero and Calibration Drift 3-19
-------
TABLES (continued)
Number Page
3-14 Test Results for Low-Range (Outlet) S02
Monitor Response Time 3-20
3-15 Test Results for High-Range (Inlet) S02 Monitor
Response Time 3-21
3-16 Test Results for 02 Monitor Response Time 3-22
3-17 Initial Test Results for Scrubber Inlet
Certification 3-24
3-18 Initial Test Results for Scrubber Outlet
Certification 3-25
3-19 Final Test Results for Low-Range (Outlet) S02
Monitor Calibration Error 3-26
3-20 Final Test Results for High-Range (Inlet) S02
Monitor Calibration Error 3-27
3-21 Final Test Results for O2 Monitor Calibration
Error 3-28
3-22 Final Tests Results for Low-Range (Outlet) So2
Monitor 2-Hour Zero and Calibration Drift 3-30
3-23 Final Test Results for High-Range (Inlet) SO2
Monitor 2-Hour Zero and Calibration Drift 3-31
3-24 Final Test Results for 02 Monitor 2-Hour Zero
and Calibration Drift 3-32
3-25 Final Test Results for Low-Range (Outlet) S02
Monitor 24-Hour Zero and Calibration Drift 3-33
3-26 Final Test Results for High-Range (Inlet) S02
Monitor 24-Hour Zero and Calibration Drift 3-34
3-27 Final Test Results for 02 2-Hour Zero and
Calibration Drift 3-35
3-28 Final Test Results for Scrubber Inlet
Certification 3-36
3-29 Final Test Results for Scrubber Outlet
Certification 3-37
VI
-------
TABLES (continued)
Number Page
3-30 Summary of Results Using 1-Hour Averages,
January 25 to March 1, 1980 3-39
3-31 Summary of Results Using 1-Hour Averages,
March 2 to March 19, 1980 3-40
3-32 Summary of Results Using 24-Hour Averages,
January 25 to March 1, 1980 3-42
3-33 Summary of Results Using 24-Hour Averages,
March 2 to March 19, 1980 3-43
3-34 Daily Data Capture and Loss 3-46
3-35 Summary of Process and CEM Operations During
Test 3-50
3-36 Inlet Data Loss 3-51
3-37 Outlet Data Loss 3-52
3-38 Summary of Weekly QA Test Results for 24-Hour
Zero and Calibration Drift 3-55
3-39 QA Test Results for Low-Range (Outlet) SOj
Monitor 24-Hour Zero and Calibration Drift,
February 7 through 14 3-56
3-40 QA Test Results for Low-Range (Outlet) S02
Monitor 24-Hour Zero and Calibration Drift,
February 14 through 21 3-57
3-41 QA Test Results for Low-Range (Outlet) S02
Monitor 24-Hour Zero and Calibration Drift,
February 21 through 28 3-58
3-42 QA Test Results for Low-Range (Outlet) S02
Monitor 24-Hour Zero and Calibration Drift,
February 28 through March 6 3-59
3-43 QA Test Results for Low-Range (Outlet)
Monitor 24-Hour Zero and Calibration Drift,
March 6 through March 13 3-60
3-44 QA Test Results for High-Range (Inlet) SO2
Monitor 24-Hour Zero and Calibration Drift,
February 7 through 14 3-61
VI1
-------
TABLES (continued)
Number Page
3-45 QA Test Results for High-Range (Inlet) S02
Monitor 24-Hour Zero and Calibration Drift,
February 14 through 21 3-62
3-46 QA Test Results for High-Range (Inlet) S02
Monitor 24-Hour Zero and Calibration Drift,
February 21 through 28 3-63
3-47 QA Test Results for High-Range (Inlet) S02
Monitor 24-Hour Zero and Calibration Drift,
February 28 through March 6 3-64
3-48 QA Test Results for High-Range (Inlet) S02
Monitor 24-Hour Zero and Calibration Drift,
March 6 through March 13 3-65
3-49 QA Test Results for O2 Monitor 24-Hour Zero
and Calibration Drift, January 31 through
February 7 3-66
3-50 QA Test Results for O2 Monitor 24-Hour Zero
and Calibration Drift, February 7 through 14 3-67
3-51 QA Test Results for O2 Monitor 24-Hour Zero
and Calibration Drift, February 14 through 21 3-68
3-52 QA Test Results for 02 Monitor 24-Hour Zero
and Calibration Drift, February 21 through 28 3-69
3-53 QA Test Results for 02 Monitor 24-Hour Zero and
Calibration Drift, February 28 through March 6 3-70
3-54 QA Test Results for O2 Monitor 24-Hour Zero
and Calibration Drift, March 6 through 13 3-71
3-55 QA Test Results for System Relative Accuracy 3-72
3-56 Summary of QA Test Results for System Relative
Accuracy 3-74
3-57 QA Moisture Data for Use with CEM Results 3-75
3-58 Particulate Test Results 3-77
viii
-------
TABLES (continued)
Number Page
3-59 Nitrogen Oxide Test Results 3-78
4-1 Process Information for Rickenbacker Air
Force Base 4-2
4-2 Assays of Coal Delivered and Burned from
January 16 to March 19 4-7
ix
-------
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This report was prepared for the Emission Measurement
Branch, Emission Standards and Engineering Division, Office of
Air Quality Planning and Standards, U.S. Environmental Protec-
tion Agency. Mr. Winton Kelly was the Technical Manager. PEDCo
Environmental, Inc., appreciates the direction and review of
procedures and data that he provided.
Mr. William G. Dewees served as PEDCo's Project Director;
Mr. Anthony S. Wisbith and Mr. Stephen J. Howie served as joint
Project Managers. Mr. Howie supervised field operations and
data analysis and was the principal author of the report. Mr.
Richard L. Campbell and Mr. Robert M. Livingston provided tech-
nical and analytical support.
-------
SECTION 1
INTRODUCTION
The primary purpose of this test was to collect continuous
sulfur dioxide (S02) emission and removal efficiency data from
the flue gas desulfurization (FGD) system serving the industrial
boiler system at Rickenbacker Air Force Base (RAFB), near Colum-
bus, Ohio.* The data are to be used to support development of a
new source performance standard for industrial boilers.
Because the continuous emission monitoring system (CEM)
used gas monitors to collect the data, performance specification
(P/S) tests were conducted at the beginning and end of clata
collection to ensure equivalence to manual reference tests.
Additional reference testing was performed throughout the test
period to provide quality assurance.
Manual tests for nitrogen oxides (NO ) and particuleites
X
were performed to determine what, if any, removal of these
pollutants occurred in the FGD system.
Records of boiler, FGD system, and CEM performance were
kept to account for data loss and excursions from normal opera-
tions, and to provide information regarding operating parameters
for correlation with data.
* Since the test, the base was transfered to the National Guard
and renamed Rickenbacker Air National Guard Base (RANGE).
1-1
-------
Volume I of this report presents the results of all tests
performed and provides background information concerning the
process, equipment, and procedures relevant to the tests.
Volume(s) II, III, and IV provide(s) detailed listings, instru-
ment calibration logs, field test data, and process logs rele-
vant to the results presented in Volume I.
1-2
-------
SECTION 2
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Continuous S02 data were collected from January 25, 1980 to
March 19, 1980, with intermittent data losses caused by CEM and
process downtime. Data were obtained for 18 or more hours per
day on 29 days and showed an average inlet emission rate of 5.2
Ib S02/106 Btu (daily standard deviation of 6.1 percent),, an
average outlet emission rate of 0.45 Ib S02/106 Btu (standard
deviation of 26 percent) and an average S02 removal efficiency
of 91.46 percent (standard deviation of 2.5 percent). Average
total boiler load for the period was 109 x 106 Btu/h, which is
52 percent of the total rated capacity of the boiler system (210
x 106 Btu/h).
The FGD system operated normally 94.1 percent of the time
during the test period (1242 hours of normal operation during
1320 total hours from 2400, January 24, to 2400, March 19). The
CEM operability was 78.0 percent (969 hours of complete data
capture during the 1242 hours available). Because of numerous
combined boiler/FGD outages and CEM failures exceeding 6 h per
24 h operating day, 23 days of potential data (18 or more hours
of normal FGD operation) were excluded from final averages.
2-1
-------
Initial P/S tests demonstrated that the CEM complied with
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) standards for perfor-
mance.* Certain tests needed to be repeated to achieve this.
Final P/S tests demonstrated continued compliance with standards
except for inlet and outlet tests of system relative accuracy,
which yielded results of 23.2 and 23.1 percent, whereas stan-
dards place the allowable limit for each at 20 percent.
Particulate tests performed on March 10 and 11 showed an
average inlet emission rate of 0.33 lb/106 Btu, an average
outlet emission rate of 0.26 lb/106 Btu, and an average removal
efficiency of 21.2 percent.
Nitrogen oxide tests performed on March 10 and 11 showed an
average inlet emission rate of 0.65 Ib NO /106 Btu, an average
4V
outlet rate of 0.63 Ib NO /106 Btu, and an average removal
^V
efficiency of 3.1 percent.
* Performance Specifications 2 and 3, Federal Register, Vol. 44,
No. 197,.October 10, 1979.
2-2
-------
SECTION 3
RESULTS
3.1 PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATION TESTS
Complete P/S tests were performed at the beginning and end
of the test period to ensure equivalence of CEM data to data
from manual reference method tests. Tables 3-1 and 3-2 sum-
marize results of the initial P/S tests, and Tables 3-3 and 3-4
summarize the results of the final P/S tests.
3.1.1 Initial P/S Test Results
Sampling Locations
Both inlet and outlet CEM and manual reference method
sampling points were chosen to be representative of the process
streams tested and achieve equivalence between manual method and
CEM samples. This was achieved in all cases by choosing
sampling points centrally located in the ducts at the furthest
accessible points downstream from possible process interfer-
ences. Inlet manual method samples were drawn immediately
downstream from the CEM probe tip (Figure 3-1), whereas outlet
CEM and manual method samples were taken from points adjacent in
the stack (Figure 3-2).
3-1
-------
TABLE 3-1. SUMMARY OF INITIAL PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATION RESULTS FOR THE S02 MONITOR
Test parameter
i .
System relative accuracy
Calibration error
Zero drift (2-h)
Zero drift (24-h)
Calibration drift (2-h)
Calibration drift (24-h)
Response time
Conditioning period
Operational period
Required performance
specifications
£20% of the mean value of the
reference method test data in
pounds per million Btu
<5% of each (50% of span, 90% of
span) calibration gas mixture
2% of span
2% of span
2% of span
2.5% of span
15 m1n maximum
168-h minimum
168-h minimum
Performance
resul
Inlet
Outlet
High High
range Mid
Low High
range Mid
High range
Low range
High range
Low range
High range
Low range
High range
Low range
High range
Low range
testing
ts
7.32%
6.64%
0.57%
0.39%
1.16%
0.58%
0.06%
0.06%
0.00%
0.00%
0.25%
0.34%
0.65%
1.11%
21.2 s
50.9 s
>168 h
>168 h
I
N>
-------
TABLE 3-2. SUMMARY OF INITIAL PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATION RESULTS FOR THE 02 MONITOR
Test parameter
Required performance
specifications
Performance testing
results
u»
I
Calibration error
Zero drift (2-h)
Zero drift (24-h)
Calibration drift (2-h)
Calibration drift (24-h)
Operational period
Conditioning period
Response time
£5% of the mean value of the
reference method test data
£0.5%
<0.4%
<0.5%
168-h minimum
168-h minimum
10 min maximum
High range
Mid range
0.43%
1.58%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.33%
>168 h
>168 h
21.1 s
-------
TABLE 3-3. SUMMARY OF FINAL PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATION RESULTS FOR THE S02 MONITOR
Test parameter
*
System relative accuracy
Calibration error
Zero drift (2-h)
Zero drift (24-h)
Calibration drift (2-h)
Calibration drift (24-h)
Response time
Conditioning period
Operational period
Required performance
specifications
<20% of the mean value of the
reference method test data in
pounds per million Btu
<5% of each (50% of span, 90% of
span) calibration gas mixture
2% of span
2% of span
2% of span
2.5% of span
15 min maximum
168 h-min1mum
168 h-minimum
Performance
resul
Inlet
Outlet
High High
range Mid
Low High
range Mid
High range
Low range
High range
Low range
High range
Low range
High range
Low range
High range
Low range
.
testing
ts
23.2%
23.1%
1.80%
0.50%
0.53%
0.59%
0.00%
0.12%
0.00%
0.20%
0.20%
0.19%
1.60%
1.50%
a
a
a
a
Not applicable.
-------
TABLE 3-4. SUMMARY OF FINAL PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATION RESULTS FOR THE 02 MONITOR
Test parameter
Calibration error
Zero drift (2-h)
Zero drift (24-h)
Calibration drift (2-h)
Calibration drift (24-h)
Operational period
Conditioning period
Response time
Required performance
specifications
<5% of the mean value of the
reference method test data
<0.4%
<0.5%
<0.4%
<0.5%
168-h minimum
168-h minimum
10 min maximum
Performance testing
results
High range 0.00%
Mid range 0.10%
0.03%
0.03%
0.09%
0.48%
a
a
a
tn
Not applicable.
-------
^ ^ ^ ^
OOOOOOf
«-48 in.
REFERENCE METHOD
SAMPLE PORTS
\
CONTINUOUS
MONITOR
PROBE
REFERENCE
METHOD
SCRUBBER
MODULE
Figure.3-1. Scrubber inlet sampling locations.
3-6
-------
REFERENCE
METHOD
TRAIN
64 in. INSIDE
DIAMETER
162 in.
CONTINUOUS
MONITOR
REFERENCE
METHOD
SAMPLE
PORT
Lr
123 in.
w
^
CONTINUOUS
x MONITOR
LOCATION
Figure 3-2. Scrubber outlet sampling locations.
3-7
-------
Conditioning Period
The period starting 1400, January 17, 1980, and ending
2400, January 24, 1980, was the conditioning period for the CEM.
During this period the CEM was operated in the same manner as it
was during the following test period, with no maintenance,
repairs, replacements, or adjustments other than specified as
routine and required by operation and maintenance manuals or the
manufacturers' representatives.
Operational Test Period
The CEM was operated from the end of the conditioning
period, 2400, January 24, 1980, through April 2, 1980, with no
maintenance, repairs, replacement, or adjustments not clearly
routine or required as specified by the manufacturers. During
this period all test data for initial and final P/S tests and
all CEM emissions data were collected.
Calibration Gas Certification
The S02 calibration gases were certified by the vendors to
have values traceable to National Bureau of 'Standards (NBS)
concentrations. The appendix in this volume includes copies of
the certificates of analysis for the four S02 calibration gases
used. The midrange oxygen calibration gas was analyzed by PEDCo
and found to have a value within 5 percent of the vendors tag
value; the vendors tag value was used (12.0% O2). The test data
for this analysis are included with the appendix in this volume.
Because ambient air (20.95 % O2) was used as the span gas, no
certification was needed.
3-8
-------
Calibration Error
Calibration error tests were performed February 8. The S02
monitor met the error limitation of less than 5 percent on both
operating ranges, and the O2 monitor met the same limitation on
its single range. Tables 3-5 and 3-6 present the test results
for the low- and high-range (outlet and inlet) SO2 monitor
calibration error; the test results for O2 monitor calibration
error are presented in Table 3-7.
2-Hour Zero and Calibration Drift
The 2-hour drift tests of the S02 and 02 monitors were
performed February 9 through February 22. The results of the
low- and high-range (outlet and inlet) S02 monitor drift tests,
presented in Tables 3-8 and Table 3-9 were both within the
allowable limit of 2 percent of span for both zero and calibra-
tion drift. The 02 monitor drift test results, presented in
Table 3-10, were within the allowable limit of 0.4 percent O2
for zero and calibration drift.
24-Hour Zero and Calibration Drift
The 24-hour drift tests were performed from January 24
through January 31. Because CEM failure on the night of
January 29 to 30 affected calibration of the SO2 monitor, the
S02 drift tests had to be repeated. The repeat drift tests for
the S02 analyzer were performed from January 31 through Febr\iary
7. Because the O2 monitor calibration was unaffected by the CEM
failure, the O2 drift test results obtained from January 24
through January 31 were valid.
3-9
-------
TABLE 3-5. INITIAL TEST RESULTS FOR LOW-RANGE (OUTLET)
S02 MONITOR CALIBRATION ERROR
(ppm S02 except as indicated)
Date in
1980
2/8
2/8
2/8
2/8
2/8
2/8
2/8
2/8
2/8
2/8
2/8
2/8
2/8
2/8
2/e
Test
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Calibration gas
concentration
(A)
254
427
254
0
427
254
0
254
427
0
427
254
0
427
0
Monitor reading
(B)
254.5
431.5
253.5
0
431.5
255
0
254
431
0
432
255.5
0
431.5
1.0
Arithmetic mean
95% confidence interval
Calibration error, % A
Arithmetic
difference
(A-B)
Mid
-0.5
+0.5
-1.0
0.0
-1.5
-0.5
0.98
0.58
Span
-4.5
-4.5
-4.0
-5.0
-4.5
-4.5
0.44
1.16
3-10
-------
TABLE 3-6. INITIAL TEST RESULTS FOR HIGH-RANGE (INLET)
S02 MONITOR CALIBRATION ERROR
(ppm SO^ except as indicated)
Date in
1980
2/8
2/8
2/8
2/8
2/8
2/8
2/8
2/8
2/8
2/8
2/8
2/8
2/8
2/8
2/8
test
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Calibration gas
concentration
(A)
0
2000
4250
2000
4250
0
4250
0
4250
2000
4250
2000
0
2000
0
Monitor reading
(B)
0
1995
4220
2000
4215
5
4210
5
4210
2000
4215
2010
10
2000
10
Arithmetic mean
95% confidence interval
Calibration error, % A
Arithmetic
difference
(A-B)
Mid
5
0
0
-10
0
-1.0
6.80
0.39%
Span
30
35
40
40
35
36
5.2
0.97%
3-11
-------
TABLE 3-7. INITIAL TEST RESULTS FOR 02 MONITOR CALIBRATION ERROR
(% D£ except as Indicated)
Test No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Calibration gas
concentration
(A)
12
20.95
12
0
12
0
20.95
0
20.95
0
20.95
12
0
12
20.95
Monitor reading
(B)
12.04
20.85
12.16
0
12.08
0
20.90
0
20.85
0
20.93
12.18
0
12.14
20.95
Arithmetic mean
95% confidence interval
Calibration error,3 % A
Arithmetic difference
(A-B)
Mid
-0.04
-0.16
-0.08
-0.18
-0.14
-0.12
0.07
1.58
Span
0.0
0.05
0.10
0.02
0.0
+0.03
0.06
0.43
(|AM| +CI9S)
M
3-12
-------
TABLE 3-8. INITIAL TEST RESULTS FOR LOW-RANGE (OUTLET) MONITOR
2-HOUR ZERO AND CALIBRATION DRIFT3
(% of scale except as indicated)
Test
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Date
in
1980
2/8
2/8
2/9
2/11
2/11
2/11
2/11
2/11
2/11
2/11
2/13
2/14
2/15
2/15
2/22
Test time
Start
1315
1600
1330
0900
1100
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2100
1315
1200
1400
1330
End
1600
1800
1530
1100
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2300
1515
1400
1600
1530
Zero reading
Start
(A)
0.2
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
End
(B)
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Arithmetic mean
95% confidence interval
2-hour drift, b %
Zero
drift
(C=B-A)
0.0
-0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
-0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
-0.01
0.05
0.07
Span reading
Start
(D)
86.3
86.5
85.7
85.5
85.6
85.4
85.4
85.2
85.6
85.7
86.0
86.0
86.2
86.2
86.5
End
(E)
86.5
85.8
85.8
85.6
85.4
85.4
85.2
85.6
85.7
85.7
86.3
85.0
85.5
86.3
86.7
Span
drift
(F=E-D
0.2
-0.7
0.1
0.1
-0.2
0.0
-0.3
0.4
0.1
0.0
0.3
-1.0
-0.7
0.1
0.2
Cali-
bration
drift
(G=F-C)
0.2
-0.5
0.1
0.1
-0.2
0.0
-0.3
0.2
0.3
0.0
0.3
-1.0
-0.7
0.1
0.2
-0.08
0.21
0.34
Calibration gas concentration of 427 ppm S02 and scale from 0 to 500 ppm S02-
See Subsection 6.2.3 for explanation of units.
3-13
-------
TABLE 3-9. INITIAL TEST RESULTS FOR HIGH-RANGE (INLET) SO? MONITOR
2-HOUR ZERO AND CALIBRATION DRIFT3
(% of scale except as indicated)
Test
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Date
in
1930
2/8
2/8
2/9
2/11
2/11
2/11
2/11
2/11
2/11
2/11
2/13
2/14
2/15
2/15
2/22
Test time
Start
1400
1600
1330
0900
1100
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2100
1315
1200
1400
1330
End
1600
1800
1530
1100
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2300
1515
1400
1600
1530
Zero reading
Start
(A)
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
End
(B)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
-0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Arithmetic mean
95% confidence interval
2-hour drift, b %
Zero
drift
(C-B-A)
-0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
-0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
-0.02
0.03
0.06
Span reading
Start
(D)
84.3
83.9
83.8
83.7
83.7
83.4
83.2
83.6
83.5
83.6
84.4
83.8
84.7
84.5
83.3
End
(E)
83.9
84.0
83.7
83.7
83.4
83.2
83.6
83.5
83.6
83.7
84.3
83.7
84.0
84.4
83.2
Span
drift
(F=E-D)
-0.4
0.1
-0.1
0.0
-0.3
-0.2
0.4
-0.1
0.1
0.1
-0.1
-0.1
-0.7
-0.1
-0.1
Cali-
bration
drift
(G=F-C)
-0.2
0.1
-0.1
0.0
-0.3
-0.2
0.4
-0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
-0.1
-0.7
-0.1
-0.1
-0.08
0.13
0.25
a Calibration gas concentration of 4250 ppm S0? and scale from 0 to 5000 ppm
S02. *
b See Subsection 6.2.3 for explanation of units.
3-14
-------
TABLE 3-10. INITIAL TEST RESULTS FOR 02 MONITOR 24-HOUR
ZERO AND CALIBRATION DRIFT3
(% of scale except as indicated)
Test
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Date
in
1980
2/8
2/8
2/9
2/11
2/11
2/11
2/11
2/11
2/11
2/11
2/13
2/14
2/15
2/15
2/22
Test time
Start
1400
1600
1330
0900
1100
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2100
1315
1200
1400
1315
End
1600
1800
1530
1100
1300
1500
1700
1900
2100
2300
2300
1515
1400
1600
1515
Zero reading
Start
(A)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
End
(B)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Arithmetic mean
95% confidence interval
2-hour drift,b %02
Zero
drift
(OB-A)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
+0.1
0.0
-0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.00
0.02
0.00
Span reading
Start
(D)
87.0
86.9
86.9
86.7
86.9
86.8
86.7
86.8
86.9
86.9
87.0
86.8
86.5
86.3
87.2
End
(E)
86.9
86.9
87.1
86.9
86.8
86.7
86.8
86.9
86.9
86.8
87.0
86.5
86.3
86.4
87.0
Span
drift
(F-E-D)
-0.1
0.0
+0.2
+0.2
-0.1
-0.1
+0.1
+0.0
0.0
-0.1
0.0
-0.3
-0.2
+0.1
-0.2
Cali-
bration
drift
(G=F-C)
-0.1
0.0
+0.2
+0.2
-0.1
-0.1
+0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
-0.3
-0.2
+0.1
-0.2
-0.03
0.08
0.02
Calibration gas concentration of 20.95% 02 and scale from 0 to 25%
Determined as ((AM] + CIg5) x 0.25.
3-15
-------
Tables 3-11 and 3-12 present results of the low- and high-
range S02 monitor 24-hour drift tests; the data show compliance
with the 2 and 2.5 percent limits for S02 monitor zero and
calibration drift. The drift data from the failed tests are
listed on the tables, but not included in calculations. Table
3-13 presents results of the O2 monitor 24-hour zero and cali-
bration drift tests; the data show compliance with the 0.5
percent limit for 02 monitor zero and calibration drift.
CEM Response Time
The instrument and system response times for DuPont 460 and
Thermox WDG III gas monitors have been shown by previous testing
to be well within the 15 minute specification. Verification of
this was obtained by tests performed March 3, showing the aver-
age response time in all cases to be less than 1 minute. Tables
3-14 and 3-15 present results of the low- and high-range (outlet
and inlet) S02 monitor tests. Table 3-16 shows test results of
the 02 monitor.
System Relative Accuracy
Ten inlet system relative accuracy tests were performed on
January 29 and 30. Results showed relative accuracy of 7.3
percent, complying with the specified limit of 20 percent.
Tests of outlet system relative accuracy were performed
from January 31 through February 20. The extended period for
the completion of these tests was needed because of CEM mainte-
nance on February 4, FGD maintenance from February 6 through 8,
3-16
-------
CO
I
TABLE 3-11. INITIAL TEST RESULTS FOR LOW-RANGE (OUTLET) S02 MONITOR 24-HOUR
ZERO AND CALIBRATION DRIFTd
Test
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Date in 1980
Start
1/24
1/25
1/26
1/27
1/28
1/29
1/30
End
1/25
1/26
1/27
1/28
1/29
1/30
1/31
Test time
Start
1820
1000
1530
1330
1630
1600
2000
End
1800
1530
1330
lf»30
1600
0900
0900
Zero reading
Start
(A)
0.8
-0.5
1.0
0.6
2.0
0.5
0.0
End
(B)
-0.5
0.0
0.6
0.6
0.5
3.5
0.0
Zero
drift
(C=B-A)
-1.3
0.5
-0.4
0.0
-1.5
3.0
0.0
Span reading
Start
(D)
83.2
88.0
87.0
85.0
96.0
94.4
82.3
End
(E)
88.0
87.0
85.0
87.0
94.4
Span
drift
(F=E-D)
4.8
-1.0
-2.0
2.0
-1.6
OFF SCALE: VO
83.2
0.9
Cali-
bration
drift
(6=F-C)
6.1
-1.5
-1.6
2.0
-0.1
ID
0.9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1/31
2/1
2/2
2/3
2/4
2/5
2/6 '
2/1
2/2
2/3
2/4
2/5
2/6
2/7
0900
0915
1400
1430
1630
1830
1648
0915
1400
1430
1530
0900
1648
2130
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Arithmetic mean
95% confidence interval
24-hour drift,b %
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
81.3
81.8
82.2
82.8
83.6
81.0
86.4
81.8
81.5
82.8
81.6
84.0
81.5
87.6
0.5
-0.3
0.5
-1.2
0.4
0.5
1.2
0.5
-0.3
0.5
-1.2
0.4
0.5
1.2
0.23
0.71
1.11
Calibration gas concentration of 427 ppm SO,, and scale from 0 to 500 ppm SO,,.
See Subsection 6.2.3 for explanation of units.
-------
I
M
00
TABLE 3-12. INITIAL TEST RESULTS FOR HIGH-RANGE (INLET) S02 MONITOR 24-HOUR
ZERO AND CALIBRATION DRIFT9
(% of scale except as indicated)
Test
No:
l
2
3
4
5
6
7
Date 1n 1980
Start
1/24
1/25
1/26
1/27
1/28
1/29
1/30
End
1/25
1/26
1/27
1/28
1/29
1/30
1/31
Test time
Start
1820
1800
1530
1330
1630
1600
2000
End
1800
1530
1330
1630
1600
. 0900
0900
Zero reading
Start
(A)
1.1
0.0
1.2
1.4
0.8
0.3
0.0
End
(B)
0.0
1.2
1.3
0.8
0.3
0.2
0.0
Zero
drift
(C=B-A)
-1.1
1.2
0.1
-0.5
-0.5
-0.1
0.0
Soan reading
Start
(D)
84.3
89.0
86.4
85.4
94.8
95.3
84.9
End
(E)
89.0
86.4
85.4
87.4
95.3
Span
drift
(F=E-D)
4.7
-2.6
-1.0
2.0
0.5
OFF SCALE: V
85.0 +0.1
Cali-
bration
drift
(G=F-C)
5.8
-3.8
-1.1
2.5
0.1
OID
0.1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1/31
2/1
2/2
2/3
2/4
2/5
2/6 '
2/1
2/2
2/3
2/4
2/5
2/6
2/7
0900
0915
1400
1430
1530
0900
1648
0915
1400
1430
1530
0900
1648
2130
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Arithmetic mean
95% confidence interval
24- hour drift,6 %
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
83.8
83.6
84.6
84.2
85.0
84.0
83.8
83.6
83.6
84.2
84.5
84.6
83.6
85.0
-0.2
0.0
-0.4
0.3
-0.4
-0.4
1.2
-0.2
0.0
-0.4
0.3
-0.4
-0.4
1.2
O.'Ol
0.54
0.65
Calibration gas concentration of 4250 ppm S02 and scale from 0 to 5000 ppm S02.
See Subsection 6.2.3 for explanation of units.
-------
TABLE 3-13. INITIAL TEST RESULTS FOR 0? MONITOR 24-HOUR ZERO AND CALIBRATION DRIFT3
(% of scale except as indicated)
i
M
VO
Test
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Date in 1980
Start
1/24
1/25
1/26
1/27
1/28
1/29
1/30
End
1/25
1/26
1/27
1/28
1/29
1/30
1/31
Test time
Start
1820
1800
1530
1330
1630
1600
2000
End
1800
1530
1330
1630
1600
0930
0900
Zero reading
Start
(A)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
End
(B)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Arithmetic mean
95% confidence interval
24-hour drift,5 % 02
Zero
drift
(C=B-A)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Span reading
Start
(D)
88.0
88.0
88.0
88.0
88.3
88.6
87.0
End
(E)
88.0
88.0
88.0
88.3
88.6
86.0
86.7
Span
drift
(F=E-D)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
-2.6
-0.3
Cali-
bration
drift
(G=F-C)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
-2.6
-0.3
-0.41
0.90
0.33
a Calibration gas concentration of 20.95% 02 and scale from 0 to 25% 02-
b Determined as % 02 = (IAM| + CIg5) x 0.25.
-------
TABLE 3-14. TEST RESULTS FOR LOW-RANGE (OUTLET) S02 MONITOR RESPONSE TIME3
(seconds)
Test No.
1
2
3
Average
Upscale
46.0
45.8
46.0
A = 45.9
Downscale
50.5
51.0
51.2
B = 50.9
System response time (slower of A and B) = 50.9
C = (A - B) = 5.0 (must be less than 15% of average or
5 seconds, whichever is less)
a Tests run at 1200 on March 3, 1980, with span gas concentration of
427 ppm S02.
3-20
-------
TABLE 3-15. TEST RESULTS FOR HIGH-RANGE (INLET) S02 MONITOR RESPONSE TIME9
I seconds)
Test No.
1
2
3
Average
Upscale
20.8
20.5
20.6
A = 20.6
Downscale
21.2
21.0
21.3
B = 21.2
System response time (slower of A and B) = 21.2
C = (A - B) = 0.6 (must be less than 15% of average or
5 seconds, whichever is less)
Tests run at 1206 on March 3, 1980, with span gas concentration
of 4250 ppm S02.
3-21
-------
TABLE 3-16. TEST RESULTS FOR 0? MONITOR RESPONSE TIME3
(seconds)
Test No.
1
2
3
Average
Upscale
21.0
21.2
21.2
A = 21.1
Downscale
21.0
20.9
21.5
B = 21.1
System response time (slower of A and B) * 21.1
C = (A - B) = 0.0 (must be less than 15% of average or
5 seconds, whichever is less)
a Tests run on March 3, 1980, with span gas concentration of
20.95% 02.
3-22
-------
and the need to repeat several tests that were void because of
operational problems. Four tests performed January 31 were void
because the air supply to the CEM probe blowback was not operat-
ing during the test, two tests performed February 5 were void
because the CEM was operating in an unrepresentative configura-
tion (a sample gas conditioner was being tested), and three
tests performed February 12 were void because of a high apparent
error of undetermined cause.
The operational problems during initial tests prompted a
complete repeat of outlet system relative accuracy tests on
February 19 and 20. These showed a relative accuracy of (i.64
percent, within the 20 percent limit. Results of the first two
tests performed February 19 were discarded from calculation
because of a faulty manual methods test probe, which was re-
placed before further testing.
Tables 3-17 and 3-18 present results of the inlet and
outlet system relative accuracy tests.
3.1.6 Final P/S Test Results
Calibration Error
Final calibration error tests were performed on April 1 and
yielded consistent with those of the initial tests performed on
February 8. Tables 3-19 and 3-20 present the results of the
low- and high-range (outlet and inlet) S02 monitor calibration
error tests; the 02 monitor calibration error results are pre-
sented in Table 3-21.
3-23
-------
TABLE 3-17. INITIAL TEST RESULTS FOR SCRUBBER INLET CERTIFICATION
Date
in '
1980
1/29
1/29
1/29
1/30
1/30
1/30
1/30
1/30
1/30
1/30
Test
No.
SO-I-1
SO-I-2
SO- I -3
SO- 1-4
SO-I-5
SO-I-6
SO-I-7
SO- I -8
SO-I-9
SO-I-10
Test time
Start
1145
1328
1447
1005
1113
1214
1321
1426
1528
1647
End
1208
1351
1510
1028
1136
1237
1344
1449
1551
1710
Average
02, vol. %
RM9
13.0
13.1
13.0
13.0
12.8
13.2
13.0
12.9
12.9
13.0
13.0
Mb
13.6
13.0
13.0
13.0
12.8
12.8
12.7
12.9
13.4
13.2
13.0
S02* ppm
RM3
1101
1110
1119
1134
1216
1060
1172
1237
1088
1125
1136
Hb
1156
1212
1179
1171
1199
1175
1208
1237
1177
1205
1192
Diff.
(Xi)
+55
+102
+60
+37
-17
+115
+36
0
+89
+80
+55.7
xi2
3,025
10,404
3,600
1,369
289
13,225
1,296
0
7,921
6,400
4,753
S02, lb/10b Btu
RM9
5.19
5.26
5.23
4.94
5.07
4.53
4.97
5.21
4.62
4.68
4.97
H"
5.31
5.18
5.03
5.00
4.99
4.90
4.99
5.19
5.30
5.27
5.12
Diff.
(Xi)
+0.12
-0.08
-0.20
+0.06
-0.08
+0.37
+0.02
-0.02
+0.68
+0.59
+0.15
M2
0.0144
0.0064
0.04
0.0036
0.0064
0.1369
0.0004
0.0004
0.4624
0.3481
0.1019
u»
I
95% confidence interval = 0.214 Ib S02/1Q6 Btu
System relative accuracy = 7.32% of average RM
a Reference method value.
Monitor value
-------
TABLE 3-18. INITIAL TEST RESULTS FOR SCRUBBER OUTLET CERTIFICATION
Date
in
1980
2/19
2/19
2/19
2/20
2/20
2/20
2/20
2/20
2/20
2/20
2/20
2/20
Test
No.
50-0-1°
50-0-2°
SO-0-3
SO-0-4
SO-0-5
SO-0-6
SO-0-7
SO-0-8
SO-0-9
SO-0-10
SO-0-11
SO-0-12
Test time
Start
1357
1737
1927
0847
0947
1047
1147
1247
1347
1457
1557
1657
End
1420
1400
1950
0910
1010
1110
1210
1310
1410
1520
1620
1720
Average
02, vol. %
RM9
13.1
13.7
12.9
12.8
13.4
13.1
13.6
13.9
13.4
13.2
14.3
13.4
Mb
15.4
13.3
13.5
12.9
12.8
12.9
13.1
13.8
13.6
13.6
13.3
14.5
13.4
SO,,, ppm
RM
19
9
100
119
95
81
77
75
133
131
141
48
100
M
91
132
105
118
101
82
82
77
132
134
149
49
103
Diff.
(xi )
72
123
5
-1
6
1
5
2
-1
3
8
1
2.9
*i2
5,184
15,129
25
1
36
1
25
4
1
9
64
1
16.7
S02, lb/106 Btu
RM9
0.123
0.036
0.449
0.500
0.396
0.365
0.333
0.344
0.638
0.587
0.618
0.245
0.447*
Mb
0.555
0.476
0.476
0.498
0.420
0.343
0.350
0.363
0.611
0.614
0.657
0.255
0.459
Diff.
(xi )
0.432
0.027
0.027
-0.002
0.024
-0.022
0.017
0.019
-0.027
0.027
0.039
0.010
0.0112
2
Xi
0.1866
0.3014
0.0007
0.000004
0.0006
0.0005
0.0003
0.0004
0.0007
0.0007
0.0015
0.0001
0.00073
to
Ul
95% confidence interval = .016 Ib S02/106 Btu
System relative accuracy - 6.64% of average RM
a
Reference method value.
Monitor value.
c Tests not used in averages and calculations.
-------
TABLE 3-19. FINAL TEST RESULTS FOR LOW-RANGE (OUTLET) SO?
MU.NITOR CALIBRATION ERROR
(ppm S02 except as.indicated)
Date
in
1980
4/1
4/1
4/1
4/1
4/1
4/1
4/1
4/1
4/1
4/1
4/1
4/1
4/1
4/1
4/1
Test
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Calibration gas
concentration
(A)
427
254
0
254
427
0
427
0
254
427
0
254
0
427
254
Monitor reading
(B)
428
254
0
253
429
0
428
0
253
429
0
253
0
429
255
Arithmetic mean
95% confidence interval
Calibration error,3 %
Arithmetic
difference
(A-B)
Mid
0
-1
-1
-1
+1
-0.40
1.11
0.59
Span
-H
+2
+1
+2
+2
+1.60
0.68
0.53
aDetermined as calibration error = tAM'A* Cl95 x 100.
3-26
-------
TABLE 3-20. FINAL TEST RESULTS FOR HIGH-RANGE (INLET) S0
MONITOR CALIBRATION ERROR
(ppm S02 except as indicated)
Date
in
1980
4/1
4/1
4/1
4/1
4/1
4/1
4/1
4/1
4/1
4/1.
4/1
4/1
4/1
4/1
4/1
Test
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Calibration gas
concentration
(A)
0
2000
4250
0
4250
0
2000
4250
0
2000
4250
2000
0
4250
2000
Monitor reading
(B)
-5
1990
4204
0
4199
0
1990
4199
0
1990
4199
1990
0
4179
1990
Arithmetic mean
95% confidence interval
Calibration error,3 % A
Arithmetic
d'f£
Mid
-10
-10
-10
-10
-10
-10
0
0.5
sre
Span
-46
-51
-51
-51
-71
-54
12
1.8
Calibration error =
3-27
-------
TABLE 3-21. FINAL TEST RESULTS FOR 0? MONITOR CALIBRATION ERROR
(% 02 except as indicated)
Date
in
1980
4/1
4/1
4/1
4/1
4/1
4/1
4/1
4/1
4/1
4/1
4/1
4/1
4/1
4/1
4/1
Test
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
G
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Calibration gas
concentration
(A)
20.9
0.0
12.0
0.0
20.9
0.0
20.9
12.0
0.0
12.0
20.9
0.0
12.0
20.9
12.0
Monitor reading
(B)
20.9
0.0
12.1
0.0
20.9
0.0
20.9
12.1
0.0
12.1
20.9
0.0
12.1
20.9
12.1
Arithmetic mean
95% confidence interval
Calibration error,
Arithmetic
difference
(A-B)
Mid
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.1
Span
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
%A=(|AMJ*CI95)X100.
3-28
-------
2-Hour Zero and Calibration Drift
Final 2-hour drift tests were performed from March 19
through 20 and yielded results consistent with those of the
tests performed February 8 through 22. Tables 3-22 and 3-23
present the results for the low- and high-range (outlet and
inlet) S02 monitor 2-hour drift tests; the results of the O2
monitor 2-hour drift tests are presented in Table 3-24.
24-Hour Zero and Calibration Drift
Final 24-hour drift tests were performed from March 11
through 18 and demonstrated compliance with the allowable
limits. Tables 3-25 and 3-26 present the results of the low--
and high-range (outlet and inlet) S02 monitor 24-hour drift
tests; the O2 monitor 24-hour drift results are presented in
Table 3-27.
System Relative Accuracy
Final system relative accuracy tests were performed from
March 31 through April 2. The inlet and outlet tests results,
presented in Tables 3-28 and 3-29, show system relative accur-
acies of 23.2 and 23.1 percent. It is suspected that the error
during these tests resulted from RM 02 data of questionable
quality; the ORSAT reagent used was found to be contaminated and
was discarded following these tests.
3-29
-------
TABLE 3-22. FINAL TEST RESULTS FOR LOW-RANGE (OUTLET) SO-> MONITOR 2-HOUR
ZERO AND CALIBRATION DRIFTa
(% of scale except as indicated)
Test
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Date
in
'1980
3/18
3/18
3/18
3/18
3/18
3/18
3/19
3/19
3/19
3/19
3/19
3/20
3/20
3/20
3/20
Test time
Start
0915
1115
1315
1515
1715
1915
0900
1100
1300
1500
1700
1045
1235
1455
1645
End
1115
1315
1515
1715
1915
2115
1100
1300
1500
1700
1900
1235
1455
1645
1845
Zero reading
Start
(A)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.4
0.2
0.1
0.1
-0.2
-0.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
End
(B)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.4
0.2
0.1
0.1
-0.2
-0.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Zero
drift
(C=B-A)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.4
-0.2
-0.1
0.0
-0.3
-0.2
0.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Arithmetic mean 0.00
95% confidence interval 0.12
2-hour drift,5 % 0.12
Span reading
Start
(D)
88.4
88.7
88.6
88.6
88.9
88.9
88.8
88.9
88.4
88.0
88.7
87.2
87.0
87.2
86.6
End
(E)
88.7
88.6
88.6
88.9
88.9
88.8
88.9
88.4
38.0
88.7
88.6
87.0
87.2
86.6
86.9
Span
drift
(F=E-D)
0.3
-0.1
0.0
0.3
0.0
-0.1
0.1
-0.5
-0.4
0.7
-0.1
-0.2
0.2
-0.6
0.3
Cali-
bration
drift
(G=F-C)
0.3
-0.1
0.0
-0.1
0.2
0.0
0.1
-0.2
-0.2
0.3
-0.1
-0.2
0.2
-0.6
0.3
-0.02
0.14
0.19
Calibration gas concentration of 427 ppm S02 and scale from 0 to 500 ppm S02-
See Subsection 6.2.3 for explanation of units.
3-30
-------
TABLE 3-23. FINAL TEST RESULTS FOR HIGH-RANGE (INLET) S02
MONITOR 2-HOUR ZERO AND CALIBRATION DRIFT3
(% of scale except as indicated)
Test
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Date
in
1980
3/18
3/18
3/18
3/18
3/18
3/18
3/19
3/19
3/19
3/19
3/19
3/20
3/20
3/20
3/20
Test time
Start
0915
1115
1315
1515
1715
1915
0900
1100
1300
1500
1700
1045
1235
1455
1645
End
0915
1315
1515
1715
1915
2115
1100
1300
1500
1700
1900
1235
1455
1645
1845
Zero reading
Start
(A)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
End
(B)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Arithmetic mean
95% confidence interval
2- hour drift,5 %
Zero
drift
(OB-A)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Span reading
Start
(D)
85.8
86.0
86.0
86.0
85.9
86.2
86.2
86.3
85.8
85.6
85.4
84.3
84.7
84.5
84.2
End
(E)
86.0
86.0
86.0
85.9
86.2
86.0
86.3
85.8
85.6
85.4
85.4
84.7
84.5
84.2
84.4
Span
.drift
(F=E-D)
0.2
0.0
0.0
-0.1
0.3
-0.2
0.1
-0.5
0.2
-0.2
0.0
0.4
-0.3
-0.3
0.2
Cali-
bration
drift
(F=F-C)
0.2
0.0
0.0
-0.1
0.3
-0.2
0.1
-0.5
0.2
-0.2
0.0
0.4
-0.3
-0.3
0.2
-0.03
0.14
0.20.
Calibration gas concentration of 4250 ppm S0? and scale from 0 to 5000 ppm
See Subsection 6.2.3 for explanation of units.
3-31
-------
TABLE 3-24. FINAL TEST RESULTS FOR D£ MONITOR 2-HOUR
ZERO AND CALIBRATION DRIFT3
(% of scale except as indicated)
Test
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Date
in
1980
3/18
3/18
3/18
3/18
3/18
3/18
3/19
3/19
3/19
3/19
3/19
3/20
3/20
3/20
3/20
Test time
Start
0915
1115
1315
1515
1715
1915
0900
1100
1300
1500
1700
1045
1235
1455
1645
End
1115
1315
1515
1715
1915
2115
1100
1300
1500
1700
1900
1235
1455
1645
1845
Zero reading
Start
(A)
0.0
-0.1
-0.1
-0.1
-0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.0
-0.3
-0.4
-0.5
End
(B)
-0.1
-0.1
-0.1
-0.1
0.0
-0.1
0.0
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.2
-0.3
-0.4
-0.5
-0.5
Arithmetic mean
95% confidence interval
2-hour drift, b %
Zero
drift
(C=B-A)
-0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
-0.1
0.0
0.2
0.0
-0.1
-0.1
-0.3
-0.1
-0.1
0.0
-0.04
0.08
0.03
Span reading
Start
(D)
86.2
86.4
86.4
86.4
86.4
86.4
86.6
86.3
86.5
86.3
86.0
84.5
84.1
85.5
86.0
End
(E)
86.4
86.4
86.4
86.4
86.4
86.4
86.3
86.5
86.3
86.0
86.0
84.1
85.5
86.0
85.8
Span
drift
(F-E-D)
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
-0.3
0.2
-0.2
-0.3
0.0
-0.4
1.6
0.5
-0.2
Cali-
bration
drift
(G=F-C)
0.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
-0.1
0.1
-0.3
0.0
-0.2
-0.2
-0.1
-0.1
1.7
0.6
-0.2
0.08
0.28
0.09
a Calibration gas concentration of 20.95%
b % 02 = (lAMl + CI95) x 0.25.
and scale from 0 to 25%
3-32
-------
u>
I
CJ
CO
TABLE 3-25. FINAL TEST RESULTS FOR LOW-RANGE (OUTLET) S02
MONITOR 24-MOURZERO AND CALIBRATION DRIFT3
(% of scale except as indicated)
Test
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Date in 1980
Start
3/11
3/12
3/13
3/14
3/15
3/16
3/17
End
3/12
3/13
3/14
3/15
3/16
3/17
3/18
Test time
Start
2045
2045
2145
1700
1345
1500
1400
End
2045
2145
1700
1345
1500
1400
0900
Zero reading
Start
(A)
0.0
0.4
0.2
-0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
End
(B)
0.4
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Arithmetic mean
95% confidence interval
24- hour drift,b %
Zero
drift
(C=B-A)
0.4
-0.2
-0.2
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.2
Span reading
Start
(D)
87.0
86.5
85.6
86.1
86.1
85.8
85.7
End
(E)
86.5
85.6
87.6
86.8
85.8
83.8
88.4
Span
drift
(F-E-D)
-0.5
-0.9
2.0
0.7
-0.3
-2.0
2.7
Cali-
bration
drift
(G=F-C)
-0.9
-0.7
2.2
0.5
-0.3
-2.0
2.7
0.2
1.1
1.5
a Calibration gas concentration of 427 ppm $03 and scale from 0 to 500 ppm S02.
b See Subsection 6.2.3 for explanation of units.
-------
TABLE 3-26. FINAL TEST RESULTS FOR HIGH-RANGE (INLET) S02
MONITOR 24-HOUR ZERO AND CALIBRATION DRIFTS
(% of scale except as indicated)
Test
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Date in 1980
Start
3/11
3/12
3/13
3/14
3/15
3/16
3/17
End
3/12
3/13
3/14
3/-,5
3/16
3/17
3/18
Test time
Start
2045
2045
2145
1700
1345
1500
1400
End
2045
2145
1700
1345
1500
1400
0900
Zero reading
Start
(A)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
End
(B)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Arithmetic mean
95X confidence interval
24-hour drift, b %
Zero
drift
(C=B-A)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
Span reading
Start
(D)
85.3
84.3
83.0
83.9
83.7
82.8
83.9
End
(E)
84.3
83.0
84.9
84.0
82.8
81.6
85.8
Span
drift
(F-E-D)
-1.0
-1.3
1.9
0.1
-0.9
-1.2
1.9
Cali-
bration
drift
(G-F-C)
-1.0
-1.3
1.9
0.1
-0.9
-1.2
1.9
-0.07
1.32
1.63
I
w
Calibration gas concentration of 4250 ppm S02 and scale from 0 to 5000 ppm S02-
See Subsection 6.2.3 for explanation of units.
-------
. TABLE 3-27. FINAL TEST RESULTS FOR 02 2-HOUR ZERO AMD CALIBRATION DRIFT3
(% of scale except as indicated)
Test
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Date in 1980
Start
3/11
3/12
3/13
3/14
3/15
3/16
3/17
End
3/12
3/13
3/14
3/15
3/16
3/17
3/18
Test time
Start
2045
2045
2145
1700
1345
1500
1400
End
2045
2145
1700
1345
1500
1400
0900
Zero reading
Start
(A)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
End
(B)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
Arithmetic mean
Confidence interval
24-hour drift,b % 02
Zero
drift
(C=B-A)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.3
0.04
0.08
0.03
Span reading
Start
(D)
86.5
83.0
86.4
85.7
86.0
86.0
85.6
End
(E)
83.0
86.4
85.7
86.0
86.0
85.6
86.3
Span
drift
(F=E-D)
-3.5
3.4
-0.7
0.3
0.0
-0.4
0.7
Cali-
bration
drift
(G=F-C)
-3.5
3.4
-0.7
0.3
0.0
-0.4
0.4
-0.08
1.84
0.48
co
u>
Ul
Calibration gas concentration of 20.95% G£ and scale from 0 to 25%
Percent 02 = (|AM| + CI95) x 0.25.
-------
TABLE 3-28. FINAL TEST RESULTS FOR SCRUBBER INLET CERTIFICATION
Date
in
1980
3/31
3/31
4/1
4/1.
4/1
4/2
4/2
4/2
4/2
4/2
4/2
4/2
. Test
No.
RI-1C
RI-2C
RI-3
RI-4
RI-5
RI-6
RI-7
RI-8
RI-9
RI-10
RI-11C
RI-12
Test time
Start
1627
1757
1237
1347
1457
0807
0937
1047
1207
1457
1607
1727
End
1650
1820
1300
1410
1520
0830
1000
1110
1230
1520
1630
1750
Average
0?, vol. %
RMa
11.2
11.5
13.9
13.4
14.0
13.7
13.0
14.1
13.4
13.1
12.8
13.2
13.5
Mb
14.8
15.4
14.1
16.0
15.3
14.7
13.7
13.4
14.4
15.7
15.7
15.3
14.7
SO?, ppm
RMa
1008
792
872
781
707
875
1062
1147
1023
789
796
853
901
Mb
978
883
870
631
699
869
1058
1101
991
764
792
818
867
Diff.
(xi)
-30
+91
-2
-150
-8
-6
-4
-46
-32
-25
-4
-35
-3.42
x-2
xi
900
8,281
4
22,500
64
36
16
2,116
1,024
625
16
1,225
3,067.3
SO?, lb/106 Btu
RM3
3.50
2.84
4.19
3.51
3.45
4.09
4.52
5.68
4.59
3.40
3.31
3.73
4.13
Mb
5.40
5.43
4.32
4.32
4.20
4.73
4.91
4.91
5.11
4.90
5.09
4.90
4.70
Diff.
(xi)
+1.90
+2.59
+0.13
+0.81
+0.75
+0.64
+0.39
-0.77
+0.52
+1.50
+1.78
+1.17
+0.74
Xi2
3.160
6.710
0.017
0.656
0.563
0.410
0.152
0.593
0.270
2.250
3.170
1.370
0.700
u>
95% confidence interval
System relative accuracy
0.215 Ib S02/106 Btu
23.2% of RM
a Reference method value.
Monitor value.
c Tests not used in averages and calculations.
-------
TABLE 3-29. FINAL TEST RESULTS FOR SCRUBBER OUTLET CERTIFICATION
Date
in '
1980
3/31
4/2
4/2
4/2
4/2
4/2
4/2
4/2
4/2
4/3
4/3
4/3
Test
No.
RO-1
RO-2
RO-3
RO-4
RO-5
RO-6
RO-7
RO-8
RO-9
RO-10
RO-11
RO-1 2
Test time
Start
1712
0732
0902
1013
1122
1242
1422
1532
1642
0912
1012
1112
End
1735
0755
0925
1036
1145
1305
1445
1555
1705
0935
1035
1135
Average
02, vol. %
RMa
13.5
14.7
12.1
12.8
13.7
11.4
13.6
13.9
12.9
13.5
14.2
14.9
13.4
Mb
16.4
14.1
13.4
13.5
14.4
14.5
14.8
15.2
15.4
14.1
13.1
13.6
14.4
S02, ppm
RMa
86
386
636
466
141
135
99
55
176
71
136
62
204
Mb
64
249
472
377
118
85
57
27
147
64
116
106
157
Diff.
(xi)
-22
-137
-164
-89
-23
-50
-42
-28
-29
-7
-20
44
-54.6
x<2
484
18,769
26,896
7,921
529
2,500
1,764
784
841
49
400
1,936
5,239
S02, lb/106 Btu
RMa
0.390
1.800
2.430
1.940
0.660
0.480
0.450
0.270
0.740
0.320
0.680
0.330
0.874
Mb
0.47.5
1.240
2.110
1.720
0.617
0.442
0.319
0.159
0.896
0.316
0.499
0.487
0.736
Diff.
'(XI)
0.085
-0.560
-0.320
-0.220
-0.040
-0.040
-0.130
-0.110
0.160
-0.004
-0.180
0.160
-0.080
xi2
0.0072
0.3136
0.1024
0.0484
0.0016
0.0016
0.0172
0.0121
0.0256
0.00002
0.0328
0.0256
0.0490
U)
I
95% confidence interval
System relative accuracy
0.137 Ib 502/10° Btu
23.1% of RM
a Reference method value.
" Monitor value.
-------
No retests were scheduled because FGD operation was likely
to differ from that of the test period for two reasons:
1. The boiler loads were expected to be reduced with the
onset of warmer weather.
2. The lime used in the FGD system and purchased for the
test was nearly depleted, and the system was scheduled
to returned to limestone operation in early April.
3.2 CONTINUOUS SULFUR DIOXIDE DATA
3.2.1 Data Listings
15-Minute Readings
Computer printouts list complete 15-minute readings showing
the wet basis FGD inlet and outlet S02 and 02 concentrations,
the moisture content of each gas stream tested, and the cor-
rected (dry basis) inlet and outlet S02 and O2 values. Inlet
and outlet emission rates (Ib S02/106 Btu) and FGD system effi-
ciencies are calculated and listed on an hourly basis. These
listings are presented in Appendix A.
1-Hour Averages
The 1-hour averages of inlet and outlet emission rates and
FGD efficiency were averaged for two periods: January 25 to
March 1 and March 2 to 19. The total averages for the two
periods were calculated from available hourly values for days
when data were collected for 18 or more hours and are presented
in Tables 3-30 and 3-31. Daily hourly listings are presented
with the appendix included in this volume.
3-38
-------
TABLE 3-30. SUMMARY OF RESULTS USING 1-HOUR AVERAGES,
JANUARY 25 TO MARCH 1, 1980
30 UPERATINli UAYS
USING 1-HOUR AVERAGES
1.900
OATEI i-25-eo
t _______ L tFF
IN OUT
AVERAGES 7|9. »22. ««b. «26.
I OF DATA 100. 66. 69. %9.
MINIMUM . if). i.OZO ,V<»7 77.940
MAXIMUM I3«. fc.93% 1.166 90.207
MEAN 110. 5.360 .436 91.966
___ ta,
I 8TO.OEV. 9. S.724 «1.<33 3.710
10-0*1 ALMUVAU £f IC1LN£T USING
I
IMEAN] E , I I 91.9021
___ 10 IU OUT
T
WTI.L. (ME ANJ is p|f Ji^Ey A.5?
I
THE MEAN FOR OATS USING T-MUUH
3-39
-------
TABLE 3-31. SUMMARY OF RESULTS USING 1-HOUR AVERAGES,
MARCH 2 TO MARCH 19, 1980
IT OPERATING DATS
SUMMAKT OF WESUI.TS
USING I-HOUR AVERAGES
lucujphj JICKEMB ACKER ara. mo ._.
DATES 3- Z-
LOAD .. I E iff
IN OUT
0 AVERAGES «08. 561.
X OF DATA 100. 93.
MINIMUM .
MAXIMUM
MEAN
S 9TO.OEV. IS. .10
30-DAT «£NOV»L CFJCILNCT U31HC
I
fMEAMI C « C I 90.SI7S
10 IX BUT
. INEANJ J^pEr^fy AS:
THE MEAN FOR I DATS US INC V-MOUR AVERAGES
3-40
-------
24 Hour Averages
The 24-hour (daily) averages of inlet and outlet emission
rates and FGD system efficiency were also calculated for the two
periods and are presented in Tables 3-32 and 3-33. As with the
1-hour averages, data were included only for days that met the
minimum data capture requirement of 18 hours.
Frequency Distributions
Histograms were plotted and demonstrate the variability of
1-hour and 24-hour data. These are presented in the appendix
included in this volume.
3.2.2 Omitted Data
There were three basic reasons that data periods did not
appear in the above listings or calculations.
Absence of Data Caused by Process Shutdown or CEM Failure--
During these occurrences no data were available for list-
ing. During occurrences where only one parameter (inlet or
outlet readings) was omitted, the other, if available, was
listed. These instances were caused by periods of CEM sampling
interface failing in the case of the affected parameter, but
continuing to operate in the case of the unaffected parameter.
FGD efficiency data could not be calculated in such cases.
Unrepresentative Process Operation
During periods when the FGD system was being operated in a
manner that did not reflect normal operational process control,
3-41
-------
TABLE 3-32. SUMMARY OF RESULTS USING 24-HOUR AVERAGES,
JANUARY 25 TO MARCH 1, 1980
30 UPDATING DATS
SUMMAKY OF KtSULTb
USING 24-HOUR AVERA6ES
OAUI
JUTE
LOAD
L
IN
tFf
OUT
i-26-eo
1-27-60
1-2B-00
i-31-eo
2- i-eo
2-26-60
2-27-60 120.
_2-?B_-«0 _ Jl*^_
2-29-60 ||3.
3- 1-60 121. 5.336
90. b
« OF DATA
MINIMUM
MAI|MUM
MEAN
SO.
121.
110.
71
27.
7.
4.7IU
5.710
5.375
22.
71.
19.
61.
I 3TO.DEV.
*O-I>AY
24
IMEAN) t
U 1
ft.
9i.975
.4)7 91.946
2. 03ft
2.216
_..^aot
23.730
CriCILNCT USING
, C t 91.»76»
.. .0111 ___ _____ _________
IMEANJ is uEFINEu AS:
i
THE MEAN rON I OAT» USIMC f-MUUK AVthACCS
3-42
-------
TABLE 3-33. SUMMARY OF RESULTS USING 24-HOUR AVERAGES,
MARCH 2 TO MARCH 19, 1980
17 UPtRAUNG DAYS
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
USING 24-HOUft AVERAGES
.LOCATION!
OATEI 3- 2-00
DATE LOAD
-AFB.4900
f
IN
tFF
OUT
lv P 00
- 3-60
- 4-00
J- b-80
- 6-60
- 7-80
* AvAO
- 9-00
-10-60
-11-60
-13-60
14-00
-1S-80
-16-00
-17-60
-16-60
19-00
AUFBACFl
\ OF DATA
MINIMUM
MEAN
STO.DEV.
t ITD.DtV.
130. f.*74
125. .259
110. .986
102. .201
116. .502
104. .916
fA4. »*«»
114. .00U
107. .sei
104. .026
120. .924
IOTT T|4T
99. .227
96. .935
02. .620
93. 4.462
IT. Ifc-
55. 52.
02. 4.482
130. ...-i.r>o<2
100. 4.965
12. .207
_JUJu«*.
.462
.300
.430
^350
_JUI***.
*»»**
»*
*«*«
.309
.649
.661
!441
35.
.300
.087
.467
.141
tHft*
91.3
93.6
91.9
90.9
93.4
*»
**
*»»
*
.. 06,
67.
06.
92.
90.
32.
66.630
93.790
90.551
2.640
SO-DAY REMOVAL EFICItNCV USING
24. __
IMEANJ E , E I 90.5B«U
30 IN OUT
NOTE! (MEAN) IS DEFINED AS:
X
THE MEAN FOR I OATS USING Y-HUUK AVERAGES
3-43
-------
data were not included in the data listings. Where available,
they are listed in Appendix A, but were not used in calculations
concerning 1-hour and 24-hour averages of FGD performance.
Failure to Obtain a Sufficient Data Base for Computation
At least two 15-minute readings per hour were necessary for
an hourly reading to be computed in the initial data listing,
and at least eighteen 1-hour averages of a parameter were needed
for data to be included into the summaries of 1-hour and 24-hour
results.
3.2.3 Process Operations Affecting 502 Emission Rates
Inlet Emission Rates
Inlet S02 emission rates were affected primarily by the
sulfur content of the coal burned. Peabody Coal Company sup-
plied the coal from the beginning of the test through February
28, whereas Yancy Minerals supplied the coal from February 29
through the end of the test. Because of a 3- to 5-day lag
between delivery and burning of coal, the data collected from
January 25 through March 1 can be viewed as representative of
the coal supplied by the first vendor, and the data collected
from March 2 through 19 as representative of a mixture of coals
from both vendors.
Outlet Emission Rates
Outlet S02 rates reflect FGD system efficiency, which
varied according to the lime feed rate. Section 4 describes the
FGD process and control practices.
3-44
-------
3.3 DATA CAPTURE AND LOSS
Table 3-34 lists the daily hours of data capture and loss
from January 25..to March 19, and Table 3-35 summarizes process
and CEM operations. The performance of the FGD system and CEM
affected data capture and are described below.
3.3.1 FGD System Performance
Total operating data showed that FGD system availability,
reliability, and operability were all 99.5 percent and that
utilization was 99.3 percent; however, 69 hours (5.3 percent of
the total FGD system operating time) was not regarded as reipre-
sentative of normal process control and was excluded from the
data base. The periods excluded were times when mechanical
breakdowns caused loss of lime feed and thus reduction of S02
removal efficiency.
3.3.2 CEM Performance
CEM Operability
Total data from January 25 to March 19 show that CEM inlet
operability was 87.1 percent, outlet operability was 81.1 per-
cent and total system operability (concurrent operation of inlet
and outlet monitors) was 78.0 percent.
CEM Downtime
A breakdown of the causes for inlet and outlet data losses
due to CEM failures is shown in Tables 3-36 and 3-37.
3-45
-------
TABLE 3-34. DAILY DATA CAPTURE AND LOSS
(hours except as indicated)
Data
day
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Date
in
1980
1/25
1/26
1/27
1/28
1/29
1/30
1/31
2/1
2/2
2/3
2/4
2/5
2/6
2/7
2/8
2/9
2/10
2/11
Normal
process
operation
24
24
18
23
24
24
24
22
11
20
24
24
18
0
13
24
24
24
Process
downtime
(abnormal
operation)
0
0
6b
1C
0
0
0
2g
13n
4g
0
0
6t
24*
llk
0
0
0
Inlet
data
capture
20
24
24
23
14
13
22
24
21
21
22
23
12
23
23
24
14
24
Outlet
data
capture
20
24
18
23
14
13
22
22
11
17
22
21
6
0
11
24
14
24
Efficiency
data
capture
20
24
18
23
14
13
22
22
10
17
22
21
6
0
11
24
14
24
02
monitor
downtime
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.
3h
3h
0
0
°h
ln
0
0
0
0
S02
monitor
downtime
0
0
0
°d
10°
lle
2f
0
0
0
21
lj
0
o
I
0
0
0
Sampling
interface
downtime
4a,
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2"
12J
0
0
0.
10J
0
U)
I
(continued)
-------
TABLE 3-34 (continued)
Data
day
No.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Date
in
1980
2/12
2/13
2/14
2/15
2/16
2/17
2/18
2/19
2/20
2/21
2/22
2/23
2/24
2/25
2/26
2/27
2/28
2/29
3/1
Normal
process
operation
24
24
24
24
24
23
22
24
24
24
18
24
24
24
24
22
24
24
24
Process
downtime
(abnormal
operation)
0
0
0
0
0
1C
2C
0
0
0
6q
0
0
0
0
2r
0
0
0
Inlet
data
capture
24
23
24
23
24
24
24
24
12
13
15
4
9
15
17
22
24
24
19
Outlet
data
capture
24
17
24
13
9
23
22
24
23
22
15
4
9
15
24
22
24
24
19
Efficiency
data
capture
24
17
24
13
9
23
22
24
12
13
15
4
9
15
17
22
24
24
19
02
monitor
downtime
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.
*h
!h
3
20h
15h
9n
0
0
0
0
5h
S02
monitor
downtime
0
lm
0
ln
0
0
0
0
on
lp
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sampl ing
interface
downtime
0.
6^
0.
ID-!
15J
0
0
on
12°
11P
0
0
0
on
7°
0
0
0
0
u>
I
(continued)
-------
TABLE 3-34 (continued)
Data
day
No.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
Date
in
1980
3/2
3/3
3/4
3/5
3/6
3/7
3/8
3/9
3/10
3/11
3/12
3/13
3/14
3/15
3/16
3/17
3/18
3/19
Normal
process
operation
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
Process
downtime
(abnormal
operation)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Inlet
data
capture
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
22
12
23
14
24
24
24
24
24
Outlet
data
capture
17
21
24
24
24
24
12
10
15
12
0
17
24
24
24
24
24
24
Efficiency
data
capture
17
21
24
24
24
24
12
10
15
12
0
17
14
24
24
24
24
24
monitor
downtime
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
12s
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
S02
monitor
downtime
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sampling
interface
downtime
7J"
j
3J
0
0
0
0.
12^
14J!
gJ
12J!
12J. .
7J.t
10U
0
0
0
0
0
*>
00
-------
a Installed gas conditioner (permeation dryer) failed and caused loss of sample. Device was removed after
failure.
Loss of lime slaker resulted in poor FGD performance.
c Temporary low lime feed rate to system.
Seven hours lost because the sample timer was off, 3 hours lost because of zero card maintenance.
f
Ten hours -lost because of the sample timer, 1 hour lost because of an integrity check.
Audit checks performed.
^ Lime slaker maintenance.
Oxygen recorder chart drive stuck.
Ultraviolet bulb changed.
^ Outlet probe filter plugged.
if
Lime slaker down for repairs.
Calibration test.
m Sample cell windows were cleaned.
Calibration checks, routine maintenance.
° Inlet blowback valve leak.
" Inlet blowback valve leak and repair.
" FGD system down for repairs.
Boilers down.
s Oil in outlet line caused false reading.
Power disconnected to probes for 1 hour.
Inlet probe tube plugged.
-------
TABLE 3-35. SUMMARY OF PROCESS AND CEM OPERATIONS
DURING TEST
Parameter
Hours
Total time in operating period
Total boiler operating time
Total FGD system operating time
Total time of representative FGD system operation
Total inlet data capture time
Total outlet data capture time
Total efficiency data capture time
02 monitor downtime
S02 monitor downtime
Inlet sampling interface downtime
Outlet sampling interface downtime
Simultaneous downtime of inlet and outlet
sampling interface
FGD system downtime
Boiler downtime
Total time of unrepresentative FGD system operation
1320
1318
1311
1242
1142
1007
969
73
30
52
116
19
7
2
69
3-50
-------
TABLE 3-36. INLET DATA LOSS
No. of
hours lost
4
17
3
5
54
2
16
1
12
23
7
10
5
Total 159
No. of
occurrences
1
1
1
4
9
1
4
1
1
1
1
1
1
27
Description
Testing of gas conditioner
Timer off
Zero card maintenance
Integrity, audit, calibra-
tion checks
Chart drive sticking, 02
recorder
Change ultraviolet lamp bulb
Outlet interface failure and
correction
S02 sample cell dirty
Oil in plant air
Blowback valve leak
Blowback solenoid valve
failure
Inlet probe plugged
02 recorder chart paper out
Remedy
a
Turned timer on
a
a
Repaired chart
drive
a
a
Cleaned cell
plant performed
maintenance
Repaired leak
Replaced valve
Replaced probe
New roll paper
Not applicable.
3-51
-------
TABLE 3-37. OUTLET DATA LOSS
No. of
hours lost
4
17
3
4
55
2
131
1
1
12
5
Total 235
No. of
occurrences
resulting in
data loss
1
1
1
3
10
1
13
1
1
1
1
34
Description
Testing gas conditioner
Timer off
Zero card maintenance
Integrity audit, calibration
Chart drive sticking, 02 re-
corder
Change ultraviolet lamp bulb
Outlet probe filter plugged
Inlet blowback repairs
Sample cell dirty
Oil in plant air
02 recorder paper out
Remedy
a
Turned timer on
a
a
Repaired chart
drive
a
Changed filter
a
Cleaned all
Plant performed
maintenance
Replaced roll
Not applicable.
3-52
-------
CEM Problems
The only apparently unsolvable problem that occured with
CEM operations was the recurrence of outlet probe filter plug-
gage. The remedy for the problem was replacement of probe
filters when they showed signs of plugging, but this was gener-
ally an unsatisfactory solution because pluggage frequently
occurred at night, when CEM operators were not present. Large
periods of data loss in excess of 6 hours per 24-hour day re-
sulted. Two major factors contributed to the high incidence of
this problem:
1. High mist carryover from the FGD process through the
test period. This was evidenced by a very obvious
rainout downwind of the stack and heavy accumulations
of wet slurry on the outlet probe.
2. Oil in the probe filter blowback air supply. This was
discovered only once in the test period, but probably
contributed to the unusually high incidence of probe
pluggage from March 8 through 12.
3.4 QUALITY ASSURANCE
A quality assurance (QA) program was performed to support
the reliability of the data between initial and final P/S test-
ing. In addition to the records of CEM operation summarized in
Subsection 3.3, two levels of testing were performed. The first
level consisted of ongoing 24-hour zero and calibration drift
tests for the entire period of January 25 through March 18, and
the second consisted of manual methods tests for system relative
accuracy and CEM moisture values.
3-53
-------
3.4.1 CEM 24 Hour Drift Tests
The 24-hour zero and calibration drift tests of both S02
monitor ranges and of the 02 monitor were performed on a weekly
basis. Data represent 24-hour S02 monitor drift from February 7
to March 13 and 24-hour 02 monitor drift from January 31 to
March 13. Table 3-38 summarizes the weekly QA test results, and
Tables 3-39 through 3-54, provide detailed results.
3.4.2 System Relative Accuracy Tests
System relative accuracy tests were performed on a weekly
basis throughout the test period. Between January 25 and
February 22, the weekly schedule was not followed because the
primary effort was directed toward completion of initial P/S
tests. The results of the QA system relative accuracy tests are
presented in Table 3-55, and Table 3-56 summarizes these re-
sults.
3.4.3 CEM Sample Mositure Determinations
The CEM moisture values used in calculations were deter-
mined from manual tests and checked to ensure that they did not
exceed the lowest dewpoint before analysis in the 02 and S02
monitors. The values are presented in Table 3-57.
Manual methods results obtained during system relative
accuracy tests were used in all cases except during the period
from February 12 through March 5 when manual determinations were
made at the CEM monitor for the outlet stream. This was done
because the low dewpoint determination did not appear to be
3-54
-------
TABLE 3-38. SUMMARY OF WEEKLY QA TEST RESULTS FOR
24-HOUR ZERO AND CALIBRATION DRIFT
Weekly
period
in 1980
1/31-2/7
2/7-2/14
2/14-2/21
2/21-2/28
2/28-3/6
3/6-3/13
Low- range S02 monitor
24-hour drift
Zero,
% of scale
a
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.4
0.3b
Calibration,
% of scale
a
1.0
1.0
0.9
1.0
l.lb
High- range S02 moniti
24-hour drift
Zero,
% of span
a
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0b
Calibration,
% of span
a
0.7
1.0
1.1
1.1
1.2b
>r 02 monitor
24-hour drift
Zero,
vol. % 02
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.03
0.00b
Calibration,
vol. % 02
0.06
0.18
0.18
0.13
0.06
0.48b
. Data presented in P/S test results.
Data overlap final P/S data.
3-55
-------
TABLE 3-39. QA TEST RESULTS FOR LOW-RANGE (OUTLET) SO,..MONITOR
24-HOUR ZERO AND CALIBRATION DRIFT, FEBRUARY 7 THROUGH 14a
(% of scale except as indicated)
Test
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Test date
Start
2/7
2/8
2/9
2/10
2/11
2/12
2/13
End
2/8
2/9
2/10
2/11
2/12
2/13
2/14
Time
Start
2130
1300
1530
1430
1100
2300
2300
End
1300
1530
1430
1100
2300
2300
1515
Zero reading
Start
(A)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
End
(B)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Arithmetic mean
95% confidence interval
24-hour drift,b %
Zero
drift
(C=B-A)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Span reading
Start
(D)
86.2
86.3
85.8
86.8
85.6
86.0
85.7
End
(E)
86.3
85.8
86.8
85.6
86.8
85.7
85.0
Span
drift
(F-E-D)
0.1
-0.5
1.0
-1.2
1.2
-0.3
-0.7
Cali-
bration
drift
(G=F-C)
0.1
-0.5
1.0
-1.2
1.2
-0.3
-0.7
-0.06
0.82
1.03
U)
Ul
'Calibration concentration of 427 ppm S02 and scale from 0 to 500 ppm S02-
See Subsection 6.2.3 for explanation of units.
-------
TABLE 3-40. QA TEST RESULTS FOR LOW-RANGE (OUTLET) S02 MONITOR
24-HOUR ZERO AND CALIBRATION DRIFT, FEBRUARY 14 THROUGH 21 a
(% of scale except as indicated)
Test.
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Test date
Start
2/14
2/15
2/16
2/17
2/18
2/19
2/20
End
2/15
2/16
2/17
2/18
2/19
2/20
2/21
Time
Start
1515
1600
1515
1430
1315
1100
2000
End
1600
1515
1430
1315
1100
2000
1615
Zero reading
Start
(A)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
End
(B)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Arithmetic mean
95% confidence interval
24-hour drift,b %
Zero
drift
(C=B-A)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Span reading
Start
(D)
85.0
86.3
86.3
85.9
85.7
86.2
85.9
End
(E)
86.3
86.3
87.1
85.7
86.2
85.9
86.3
Span
drift
(F=E-D)
1.3
0.0
0.8
-0.2
0.5
-0.3
0.4
Cali-
bration
drift
(G=F-C)
1.3
0.0
0.8
-0.2
0.5
-0.3
0.4
0.36
0.53
1.04
OJ
I
tn
Calibration gas concentration of 427 ppm S02 and scale from 0 to 500 ppm
See Subsection 6.2.3 for explanation of units.
-------
TABLE 3-41. QA TEST RESULTS FOR LOW-RANGE (OUTLET) S02 MONITOR
24-HOUR ZERO AND CALIBRATION DRIFT, FEBRUARY 21 THROUGH 28a
(% of scale except as indicated)
u>
U1
00
Test
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Test date
Start
2/21
2/22
2/23
2/24
2/25
2/26
2/27
End
2/22
2/23
2/24
2/25
2/26
2/27
2/28
Time
.Start
1615
1530
1445
1500
1700
2000
2245
End
1530
1445
1500
1700
2000
2245
2300
Zero reading
Start
(A)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
-0.2
0.0
End
(B)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
-0.2
0.0
0.0
Arithmetic mean
95% confidence interval
24-hour drift.,b %
Zero
drift
(C=B-A)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
-0.2
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Span reading
Start
(D)
86.3
86.7
87.0
86.0
85.3
86.5
86.4
End
(E)
86.7
87.0
86.0
85.3
86.5
86.4
86.5
Span
drift
(F=E-D)
0.4
0.3
-1.0
-0.7
1.2
-0.1
0.1
Cali-
bration
drift
(G=F-C)
0.4
0.3
-1.0
-0.7
1.4
-0.3
0.1
0.03
0.74
0.90
alibration gas concentration of 427 ppm S02 and scale from 0 to 500 ppm S02-
Subsection 6.2.3 for explanation of units.
-------
TABLE 3-42. QA TEST RESULTS FOR LOW-RANGE (OUTLET) SO? MONITOR.
24-HOUR ZERO AND CALIBRATION DRIFT, FEBRUARY 28 THROUGH MARCH 6£
(% of scale except as indicated)
Test
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Test date
Start
2/28
2/29
3/1
3/2
3/3
3/4
3/5
End
2/29
3/1
3/2
3/3
3/4
3/5
3/6
Time
.Start
2300
1730
1415
1545
1200
1845
1800
End
1730
1415
1545
1200
1845
1800
1745
Zero reading
Start
(A)
0.0
0.0
0.3
-0.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
End
(B)
0.0
0.3
-0.4
0.0
0.0
-0.2
0.0
Arithmetic mean
95% confidence interval
24-hour drift^ %
Zero
drift
(C=B-A)
0.0
0.3
-0.7
0.4
0.0
-0.2
0.0
-0.03
0.33
0.36
Span reading
Start
(D)
86.5
86.2
86.4
85.4
86.0
86.0
86.4
End
(E)
87.5
86.4
85.4
86.0
85.0
86.6
86.6
Span
drift
(F=E-D)
1.0
0.2
-1.0
1.0
-1.0
0.6
0.2
Cali-
bration
drift
(G=F-C)
1.0
-0.1
0.6
-0.4
-1.0
0.8
0.2
0.16
0.66
0.96
U)
I
01
vo
Calibration gas concentration of 427 ppm S02 and scale from 0 to 500 ppm SO,,,
See Subsection 6.2.3 for explanation of units.
-------
TABLE 3-43. QA TEST RESULTS FOR LOW-RANGE (OUTLET) SO? MONITOR
24-HOUR ZERO AND CALIBRATION DRIFT, MARCH 6 THROUGH MARCH 13a
(% of scale except as indicated)
Test
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Test date
Start
3/6
3/7
3/8
3/9
3/10
3/11
3/12
End
3/7
3/8
3/9
3/10
3/11
3/12
3/13
Time
.Start
1745
1700
1430
1445
1745
2045
2045
End
1700
1430
1445
1745
2045
2045
2145
Zero reading
Start
(A)
0.0
-0.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.4
End
(B)
-0.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.4
0.2
Arithmetic mean
95% confidence interval
24-hour drift,b %
Zero
drift
(C=B-A)
-0.4
0.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.4
-0.2
0.03
0.22
0.25
Span reading
Start
(D)
86.6
85.6
86.1
86.7
86.0
87.0
86.5
End
(E)
85.6
86.1
86.7
85.3
87.0
86.5
85.6
Span
drift
(F=E-D)
-1.0
0.5
0.6
-1.4
1.0
-0.5
-0.9
Cali-
bration
drift
(G=F-C)
0.3
0.1
0.6
-1.4
1.0
-0.9
-0.7
-0.14
0.81
1.11
U)
o>
o
'Calibration gas concentration of 427 ppm S02 and scale from 0 to 500 ppm S02<
JSee Subsection 6.2.3 for explanation of units.
-------
u>
I
en
TABLE 3-44. QA TEST RESULTS FOR HIGH-RANGE (INLET) SO? MONITOR
24-HOUR ZERO AND CALIBRATION DRIFT, FEBRUARY 7 THROUGH 143
(% of scale except as indicated)
Test
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Test date
Start
2/7
2/8
2/9
2/19
2/11
2/12
2/13
End
2/8
2/9
2/10
2/11
2/12
2/13
2/14
Time
Start
2130
1300
1530
1430
1100
2300
2300
End
1300
1530
1430
1100
2300
2300
1515
Zero reading
Start
(A)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
-0.1
End
(B)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
-0.1
0.0
Arithmetic mean
95% confidence interval
24-hour drift,b %
Zero
drift
(C=B-A)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
-0.1
0.1
0.00
0.05
0.05
Span reading
Start
(D)
84.0
84.3
83.7
84.0
83.7
84.7
84.3
End
(E)
84.4
83.7
84.0
83.7
84.7
84.3
83.7
Span
drift
(F-E-D)
0.4
-0.6
0.3
-0.3
1.0
-0.4
-0.6
Cali-
bration
drift
(G=F-C)
0.4
-0.6
0.3
-0.3
1.0
-0.3
-0.7
-0.03
0.57
0.70
Calibration gas concentration of 4250 ppm S02 and scale from 0 to 5000 ppm
See Subsection 6.2.3 for explanation of units.
-------
TABLE 3-45. QA TEST RESULTS FOR HIGH RANGE (INLET) S02 MONITOR
24-HOUR ZERO AND CALIBRATION DRIFT3, FEBRUARY 14-21
W
I
to
Test
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Test date
Start
2/14
2/15
2/16
2/17
2/18
2/19
2/20
End
2/15
2/16
2/17
2/18
2/19
2/20
2/21
Time
.Start
1515
1600
1515
1430
1315
1100
2000
End
1600
1515
1430
1315
1100
2000
1615
Zero reading
Start
(A)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
End
(B)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Arithmetic mean
95% confidence interval
24-hour drift , percent
Zero
drift
(C=B-A)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Span reading
Start
(D)
83.7
84.4
84.9
84.0
84.8
83.7
84.0
End
(E)
84.4
84.9
84.0
84.8
83.7
84.0
84.4
Span
drift
(F=E-D)
0.7
0.5
-0.9
0.8
-1.1
0.3
0.4
Cali-
bration
drift
(G=F-C)
0.7
0.5
-0.9
0.8
-1.1
0.3
0.4
0.1
0.71
0.95
Calibration gas concentration of 4250 ppm SO, and scale from 0 to 5000 ppm S09<
h
See Subsection 6.2.3 for explanation of units.
-------
TABLE 3-46. QA TEST RESULTS FOR HIGH-RANGE (INLET) SO? MONITOR
24-HOUR ZERO AND CALIBRATION DRIFT, FEBRUARY 21 THROUGH 28a
(% of scale except as indicated)
Ul
U)
Test
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Test date
Start
2/21
2/22
2/23
2/24
2/25
2/26
2/27
End
2/22
2/23
2/24
2/25
2/26
2/27
2/28
Time
Start
1615
1530
1445
1500
1700
2000
2245
End
1530
1445
1500
1700
2000
2245
2300
Zero reading
Start
(A)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
-0.1
0.0
End
(8)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
-0.1
0.0
0.0
Arithmetic mean
95% confidence interval
24-hour drift,b %
Zero
drift
(C=B-A)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
-0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.05
0.05
Span reading
Start
(D)
84.4
83.2
84.0
84.0
83.0
84.3
83.8
End
(E)
83.2
84.0
84.0
83.0
84.3
83.8
83.8
Span
drift
(F=E-D)
-1.2
0.8
0.0
-1.0
1.3
-0.5
0.0
Cali-
bration
drift
(G=F-C)
-1.2
0.8
0.0
-1.0
1.4
-0.6
0.0
-0.08
0.87
1.12
Calibration gas concentration of 4250 ppm SOp and scale from 0 to 5000 ppm
DSee Subsection 6.2.3 for explanation of units.
-------
TABLE 3-47. QA TEST RESULTS FOR HIGH-RANGE (INLET) SO? MONITOR
24-HOUR ZERO AND CALIBRATION DRIFT, FEBRUARY 28 THROUGH MARCH 69
(% of scale except as indicated)
Test
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Test date
Start
2/28
2/29
3/11
3/2
3/3
3/4
3/5
End
2/29
3/1
3/2
3/3
3/4
3/5
3/6
Time
Start
2300
1730
1415
1545
1200
1845
1800
End
1730
1415
1545
1200
1845
1800
1745
Zero reading
Start
(A)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
-0.2
0.0
0.0
End
(B)
0.0
0.0
0.0
-0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
Arithmetic mean
95% confidence interval
24-hour drift,b %
Zero
drift
(C=B-A)
0.0
0.0
0.0
-0.2
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.11
0.11
Span reading
Start
(D)
83.8
83.7
83.6
83.4
83.6
83.9
84.2
End
(E)
85.3
83.6
83.4
83.6
81.9
84.4
84.0
Span
drift
(F=E-D)
1.5
-0.1
-0.2
0.2
-1.7
0.5
-0.2
Cali-
bration
drift
(G=F-C)
1.5
-0.1
-0.2
0.4
-1.9
0.5
-0.2
0.00
0.95
1.12
'Calibration gas concentration of 4250 ppm SO,, and scale from 0 to 5000 ppm S02-
3See Subsection 6.2.3 for explanation of units.
-------
TABLE 3-48. QA TEST RESULTS FOR HIGH-RANGE (INLET) S02 MONITOR
24-HOUR ZERO AND CALIBRATION DRIFT, MARCH 6 THROUGH MARCH 13a
(% of scale except as indicated)
OJ
i
-------
TABLE 3-49. QA TEST RESULTS FOR 02 MONITOR 24-HOUR ZERO AND
CALIBRATION DRIFT, JANUARY 31 THROUGH FEBRUARY ?a
(% of scale except as indicated)
U)
I
Test
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Test date
Start
1/31
2/1
2/2
2/3
2/4
2/5
2/6
End
2/1
2/2
2/3
2/4
2/5
2/6
2/7
Time
.-Start
0900
0915
1400
1430
1600
1830
1648
End
0915
1400
1430
1600
1830
1648
2130
Zero reading
Start
(A)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
End
(B)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Arithmetic mean
95% confidence interval
24-hour drift,b % 02
Zero
drift
(C=B-A)
0.0
o.o -
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Span reading
Start
(D)
86.7
86.5
86.5
86.5
86.5
86.5
86.5
End
(E)
86.5
86.5
86.5
86.5
86.5
86.5
87.0
Span
drift
(F=E-D)
-0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
"0.0
0.0
0.5
Cali-
bration
drift
(G=F-C)
-0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.5
0.04
0.20
0.06
Calibration gas concentration of 20.95% 0~ and scale from 0 to 25%
'Percent 0? = (|AM| + CIg5) x 0.25.
-------
TABLE 3-50. QA TEST RESULTS FOR 02 MONITOR 24-HOUR ZERO AND
CALIBRATION DRIFT, FEBRUARY 7 THROUGH 14a
(% of scale except as indicated)
Test
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Test date
Start
2/7
2/8
2/9
2/10
2/11
2/12
2/13
End
2/8
2/9
2/10
2/11
2/12
2/13
2/14
Time
Start
2130
1300
1530
1430
1100
2300
2300
End
1300
1530
1430
1100
2300
2300
1515
Zero reading
Start
(A)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
End
(B)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Arithmetic mean
95% confidence interval
24-hour drift,b % 02
Zero
drift
(C=B-A)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Span reading
Start
(D)
87.0
87.0
87.1
85.8
86.9
87.0
87.0
End
(E)
87.0
87.1
85.8
86.9
87.0
87.0
86.5
Span
drift
(F=E-D)
0.0
0.1
-1.3
1.1
0.1
0.0
-0.5
Cali-
bration
drift
(G=F-C)
0.0
0.1
-1.3
1.1
0.1
0.0
-0.5
-0.07
0.67
0.18
U)
I
cr>
Calibration gas concentration of 20.95% 0~ and scale from 0 to 25 percent Op.
'Percent 0 = (|AM| + CI) x 0.25.
g5
-------
TABLE 3-51. QA TEST RESULTS FOR 02 MONITOR 24-HOUR ZERO AND
CALIBRATION DRIFT, FEBRUARY 14 THORUGH FEBRUARY 21a
(% of scale except as indicated)
Test
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Test date
Start
2/14
2/15
2/16
2/17
2/18
2/19
2/20
End
2/15
2/16
2/17
2/18
2/19
2/20
2/21
Time
.Start
1515
1600
1515
1430
1315
1100
2000
End
1600
1515
1430
1315
1100
2000
1615
Zero reading
Start
(A)
0.0
0.0
-0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
End
(B)
0.0
-0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Arithmetic mean
95% confidence interval
24-hour drift, b % 02
Zero
drift
(C=B-A)
0.0
-0.2
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.11
0.03
Span reading
Start
(D)
86.5
86.4
86.3
86.0
86.6
86.5
86.0
End
(E)
86.4
86.3
86.0
86.6
86.5
86.0
87.0
Span
drift
(F-E-D)
-0.1
-0.1
-0.3
0.6
-0.1
-0.5
-1.0
Cali-
bration
drift
(G=F-C)
-0.1
0.1
-0.5
0.6
-0.1
-0.5
-1.0
-0.21
0.47
0.18
Calibration gas concentration of 20.95 percent 0,, and scale from 0 to 25 percent 02.
Percent 02 = (|AM| + CIg5) x 0.25.
10
I
CTi
00
-------
TABLE 3-52. QA TEST RESULTS FOR 02 MONITOR 24-HOUR ZERO AND
CALIBRATION DRIFT, FEBRUARY 21 THROUGH FEBRUARY 283
(% of scale except as indicated)
Test
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Test date
Start
2/21
2/22
2/23
2/24
2/25
2/26
2/27
End
2/22
2/23
2/24
2/25
2/26
2/27
2/28
Time
Start
1615
1530
1445
1500
1700
2000
2245
End
1530
1445
1500
1700
2000
2245
2300
Zero reading
Start
(A)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
End
(B)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Arithmetic mean
95% confidence interval
24-hour drift,b % 02
Zero
drift
(C=B-A)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Span reading
Start
(D)
87.0
87.0
87.0
86.0
86.0
86.0
86.0
End
(E)
87.0
87.0
86.0
86.0
86.0
86.0
86.7
Span
drift
(F=E-D)
0.0
0.0
-1.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.7
Cali-
bration
drift
(G=F-C)
0.0
0.0
-1.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.7
-0.04
0.46
0.13
vo
Calibration gas concentration of 20.95 percent 02 and scale from 0 to 25 percent 02.
Percent 02 = (|AM| + CIg5) x 0.25.
-------
TABLE 3-53. QA TEST RESULTS FOR 02 MONITOR 24-HOUR ZERO AND
CALIBRATION DRIFT, FEBRUARY 28 THROUGH MARCH 6a
of scale except as indicated)
Test
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Test date
Start
2/28
2/29
3/1
3/2
3/3
3/4
3/5
End
2/29
3/1
3/2
3/3
3/4
3/5
3/6
Time
Start
2300
1730
1415
1545
1200
1845
1800
End
1730
1415
1545
1200
1845
1800
1745
Zero reading
Start
(A)
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
End
(B)
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Arithmetic mean
95% confidence interval
24-hour drift,5 % 02
Zero
drift
(C=B-A)
0.2
-0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.11
0.03
Span reading
Start
(D)
86.7
87.0
86.7
86.9
86.8
87.0
86.7
End
(E)
87.0
86.7
86.9
86.8
87.0
86.7
86.9
Span
drift
(F=E-D)
0.3
-0.3
0.2
-0.1
0.2
-0.3
0.2
Cali-
bration
drift
(G=F-C)
0.1
-0.1
0.2
0.1
0.2
-0.3
0.2
0.06
0.18
0.06
Calibration gas concentration of 20.95 percent 0? and scale from 0 to 25 percent
bPercent 02 = (|AM| + CIg5) x 0.25.
-------
TABLE 3-54. QA TEST RESULTS FOR 02 MONITOR 24-HOUR ZERO AND
CALIBRATION DRIFT, MARCH 6 THROUGH MARCH 13a
(% of scale except as indicated)
Test
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Test date
Start
3/6
3/7
3/8
3/9
3/10
3/11
3/12
End
3/7
3/8
3/9
3/10
3/11
3/12
3/13
Time
Start
1745
1700
1430
1445
1745
2045
2045
End
1700
1430
1445
1745
2045
2045
2145
Zero reading
Start
(A)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
End
(B)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Arithmetic mean
95% confidence interval
24-hour drift,b % 02
Zero
drift
(C=B-A)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Span reading
Start
(P)
86.9
87.0
86.0
86.9
86.5
86.5
83.0
End
(E)
87.0
86.0
86.9
86.5
86.5
83.0
86.4
Span
drift
(F=E-D)
0.1
-0.1
0.9
-0.1
0.0
-3.5
3.4
Cali-
bration
drift
(G=F-C)
0.1
-0.1
0.9
-0.1
0.0
-3.5
3.4
0.10
1.87
0.49
U)
Calibration gas concentration of 20.95% 02 and scale from 0 to 25% 02.
Percent 02 = (|AM| + CIg5) x 0.25.
-------
TABLE 3-55. QA TEST RESULTS FOR SYSTEM RELATIVE ACCURACY1
Week
in
1980
1/27-2/2
1/27-2/2
1/27-2/2
2/3-2/9
2/3-2/9
2/3-2/9
2/3-2/9
2/10-2/16
2/10-2/16
2/10-2/16
2/10-2/16
2/10-2/16
2/10-2/16
2/24-3/1
2/24-3/1
2/24-3/1
2/24-3/1
2/24-3/1
2/24-3/1
3/2-3/8
3/2-3/8
3/2-3/8
3/2-3/8
3/2-3/8
3/2-3/8
Day
in
1980
2/1
2/1
2/1
2/5
2/5
2/6
2/6
2/12
2/12
2/12
2/13
2/13
2/13
2/26
2/26
2/26
2/27
2/27
2/27
3/6
3/6
3/6
3/6
3/6
3/6
Sampling
location
Outlet
Outlet
Outlet
Outlet
Outlet
Outlet
Outlet
Outlet
Outlet
Outlet
Outlet
Outlet
Outlet
Inlet
Inlet
Inlet
Outlet
Outlet
Outlet
Inlet
Inlet
Inlet
Outlet
Outlet
Outlet
Test
time
d
d
d
0941
1051
1446
1546
1757e
1857e
1957e
1057
1257
1357
1747o
1917e
2017e
1303
1433
1556
0902
1002
1122
1317e
1417
1527
02 vol. , %
RMb
12.0
13.7
13.3
14.5
12.0
12.6
12.7
14.2
14.2
14.0
14.0
14.0
14.0
12.6
d
d
12.2
12.0
11.9
12.8
13.2
15.5
12.8
12.8
13.0
Mc
12.6
13.9
12.6
14.4
12.3
13.1
13.5
13.3
13.2
13.2
13.0
12.1
13.0
12.7
12.8
12.9
12.2
12.1
11.7
13.3
13.9
16.0
14.4
13.0
13.6
S02, ppm
RMb
120
135
123
53
123
165
149
10
12
42
56
74
46
1121
983
894
145
182
200
1261
1225
814
d
217
188
MC
98
113
108
43
115
172
127
42
46
82
63
116
81
1297
1271
1263
110
154
134
1245
1164
768
152
180
139
S02, lb/106 Btu
RMb
0.45
0.59
0.55
0.28
0.46
0.67
0.61
0.02
0.02
0.09
0.271
0.36
0.22
4.54
d
d
0.56
0.69
0.75
5.24
5.35
5.07
d
0.90
0.80
MC
0.40
0.54
0.44
0.22
0.45
0.75
0.58
0.19
0.20
0.36
0.27
0.44
0.35
5.33
5.28
5.33
0.43
0.59
0.49
5.49
5.58
5.30
0.79
0.76
0.64
Diff.
-0.05
-0.05
-0.11
-0.055
-0.010
+0.76
-0.033
+0.167
+0.180
+0.264
-0.002
+0.083
+0.126
+0.79
d
d
-0.13
-0.10
-0.26
+0.25
+0.23
+0.23
d
-0.14
-0.16
Arithmetic
difference
mass/GCV
i
% of RV
-12.9
-1.0
+24.5
+17.4
-24.5
+4.5
-17.5
u>
tsJ
(continued)
-------
TABLE 3-55 (continued)
Week
in
1980
3/9-3/15
3/9-3/15
3/9-3/15
3/9-3/15
3/9-3/15
3/9-3/15
3/9-3/15
3/9-3/15
Day
in
1980
3/13
3/13
3/13
3/13
3/13
3/13
3/13
3/13
Sampling
location
Inlet
Inlet
Inlet
Inlet
Outlet
Outlet
Outlet
Outlet
Test
time
1308
1458
1558
1718
1906
1546
1656
1816
02 vol. , %
RMb
12.8
12.4
12.8
12.6
13.0
13.0
13.0
12.7
MC
12.8
12.8
12.9
12.7
13.3
13.4
13.4
13.3
S02, ppm
RMb
1187
1165
1110
1182
167
72
141
136
MC
1193
1160
1130
1178
130
126
120
111
S02, lb/106 Btu
RMb
4.93
4.61
4.61
4.79
0.71
0.31
0.60
0.56
MC
4.93
4.82
4.75
4.83
0.58
0.56
0.53
0.49
Diff.
+0.00
+0.21
+0.14
+0.04
-0.13
+0.25
-0.07
-0.07
Arithmetic
di f fer^nrp
mass/GCV
l
% of RV
+2.1
-3.7
U)
I
^J
U)
Results for February 17 to 23 and March 30 to April 5 were discussed in Subsection 3.1; during the
week of March 16 to 23, data were collected only for the 4 days from March 16 to 19; no tests were
scheduled from March 23 to 29.
Reference method value.
Monitor value.
Not available.
Test excluded from data base.
-------
TABLE 3-56. SUMMARY OF QA TEST RESULTS FOR SYSTEM RELATIVE ACCURACY
Week
in
1980
1/20-1/26
1/27-2/2
1/27-2/2
2/3-2/9
2/10-2/16
2/17-2/23
2/24-3/1
2/24-3/1
3/2-3/8
3/2-3/8
3/9-3/15
3/9-3/15
3/16-3/29
3/30-4/5
Date
in
1980
Sampling
location
No. of
data3
Not testedd
2/1
Outlet
3
Inlet P/S tests performed
2/5-6
2/12-2/1
Outlet9
3 Outlet9
4
3h
Outlet P/S tests performed9'1
2/26
2/27
3/6
3/6
Inlet
Outlet
Inlet
Outlet
Inlet
Outlet
1J
3
3
2k
4
4
No tests performed
Inlet and outlet P/S
tests performed"1
Arithmetic nean,
Ib SOZ/106 Btu
RMb
e
0.53
e
0.51
0.28
e
4.54
0.67
5.22
0.85
4.74
0.55
e
e
Mc
e
0.46
e
0.50
0.35
e
5.33
0.54
5.46
0.70
4.83
0.54
e
e
Aritmethic mean, X
,M-RM inn\
( RM x 100)
3
-13.2
e
-2.0
+25.0
e
+ 17.4
-19.4
+4.6
-17.6
+1.9
-1.8
e
e
b Not including tests excluded.
Reference method value.
Monitor value.
No tests scheduled, only 1 of CEM operating.
* No QA test data available.
See Table 3-17 for inlet P/S results.
? Inlet not tested, efforts concentration on outlet testing.
. Six tests completed, three tests discarded because of reference method probe failure.
1 See Table 3-18 for outlet P/S results.
J Three tests completed, two tests discarded because of ORSAT test failure.
. Three tests completed, discarded due to S02 analysis failure.
The CEM data collection finished March 18; there was no return until March 31 for final P/S testing.
" See Table 3-28 and 3-29 for final P/S results.
3-74
-------
TABLE 3-57. QA MOISTURE DATA FOR USE WITH CEM RESULTS
(% H20)
Date of test
in 1980
1/29
1/30
2/1
2/5
2/6
2/12
2/13
2/19
2/20
2/26
2/27
3/6
3/8
3/9
3/10
3/11
3/12
3/13
3/14
3/15
3/16
3/19
Inlet3
3.33
3.34
d
d
d
d
d
d
d
1.45
d
2.86
d
d
d
d
d
1.88
d
d
d
d
Outlet9
d
d
11.8
10.5
12-?Q
4-9P
3-°^
4-3!
4.2e
d o
4.3e
16.5
d
d
d
d
d
14.0
d
d
d
d
Maximum S02
14.6
14.6
14.6
14.6
14.6
14.6
14.6
14.6
14.6
14.6
14.6
14.6
10.2
11.3
10.2
9.7
10.2
9.7
9.2.
11.3
10.2
11.3
Maximum 02
2.76
2.76
2.76
2.76
2.76
2.76
2.76
2.76
2.76
2.76
2.76
2.76
2.76
2.76
2.76
2.76
2.76
2.76
2.76
2.76
2.76
2.76
Determined during Method 6 S02, tests except where noted. When no tests
were performed, CEM data were determined from the last previous moisture
value or, if no previous value was available, from the next following
value.
Determined from moisture saturation at monitor mist knockout trap tempera-
ture and pressure (information from calibration sheets in Appendix B).
Determined from moisture saturation at room temperature (68°F) and 5 in. Hg
vacuum.
No test.
3-75
-------
valid during this period, as evidenced by a lack of condensate
accumulation in the mist knockout traps. The reason for this
occurrence was cold weather, which apparently cooled portions of
the outlet sampling interface to a temperature below the stack
moisture dewpoint.
3.5 PARTICULATE AND NO RESULTS
J*±
The particulate concentration at the FGD system inlet
averaged 0.15 gr/dscf with an average emission rate of 0.33
lb/106 Btu. At the FGD system outlet the particulate concen-
tration averaged 0.12 gr/dscf with an average emission rate of
0.26 lb/106. Based on these rates, the average FGD system
particulate removal efficiency was 21.2 percent. Table 3-58
presents the particulate test results.
The average NO concentration at the FGD system inlet was
X
178 ppm with an average emission rate of 0.65 lb/106 Btu. At
the FGD system outlet the average emission rate of 0.63 lb/106
Btu. Based on these rates, the FGD system reduced the NO
X
emissions by an average of 3.1 percent; however, because of the
data scatter, it cannot be statistically concluded that the
outlet result differs from the inlet result. Table 3-59
presents NO test results.
3-76
-------
TABLE 3-58. PARTICULATE TEST RESULTS
Test No.
RI5-1
RI5-2
RI5-3
Average
R05-1
R05-2
R05-3
Average
Date in
1980
3/12
3/12
3/13
3/12
3/12
3/13
Sampling location
Inlet
Outlet
Concentration,3
gr/dscf
0.14
0.16
0.14
0.15
0.09
0.13
0.12
0.12
Emission rate,
lb/106 Btu (
0.33
0.35
0.30
0.33
0.21
0.29
0.27
0.26
Grains per dry standard cubic foot at 68°F and 29.92 in. Hg.
-------
TABLE 3-59. NITROGEN OXIDE TEST RESULTS
Test No.
NOI-l-A
NOI-l-B
NOI-l-C
NOI-l-D
Average
NOI-2-A
NOI-2-B
NOI-2-C
NOI-2-D
Average
NOI-3-A
NOI-3-B
NOI-3-C
NOI-3-D
Average
Date in
1980
3/10
3/10
3/10
3/10
3/10
3/10
3/10
3/10
3/11
3/11
3/11
3/11
INLET AVERAGE
NOO-l-A
NOO-l-B
NOO-l-C
NOO-l-D
Average
NOO-2-A
NOO-2-B
NOO-2-C
NOO-2-D
Average
3/10
3/10
3/10
3/10
3/10
3/10
3/10
3/10
Sampling location
Inlet
Inlet
Inlet
Outlet
Outlet
Concentration,
ppm
203
184
159
182
182
191
140
158a
342a
163
190
216
257
226
222
189
132
115
131
135
128
136
127
65
187
129
Emission rate,
lb/106 Btu
0.77
0.71
0.60
0.63
0.68 '
0.70
0.49
0.56
NA
0.58
0.60
0.68
0.82
0.67
0.69
0.65
0.64
0.54
0.63
0.63
0.61
0.64
0.59
0.30
0.84
0.59
CO
«vl
00
-------
CO
I
UD
TABLE 3-59 (continued)
Test No.
NOO-3-A
NOO-3-B
NOO-3-C
NOO-3-D
Average
Date in
1980
3/11
3/11
3/11
3/11
OUTLET AVERAGE
Sampling location
Outlet
Concentration,
ppm
144
145
143
149
145
134
Emission rate,
lb/106 Btu
0.67
0.70
0.75
0.72
0.71
0.63
-------
SECTION 4
PROCESS DESCRIPTION
4.1 PHYSICAL PLANT
Table 4-1 lists process information.
4.1.1 Boiler System
The boiler system consists of six industrial-size boilers
designed to supply high-temperature water for building and water
heating at the base. The five older boilers are rated at 30 x
106 Btu/h, and the newer boiler is rated at 60 x 106 Btu/h. The
boilers are stoker fired, with coal spread on under-air-flow
perforated grates and burned at a typical ash bed depth of 3 to
5 inches. Grates are mechanically rotated in all bxit the oldest
operating boiler to remove ash to the pneumatic disposal system.
Ash must be removed manually from the grate of the oldest unit
in operation.
4.1.2 FGD System
The FGD ststem consists of a mechanical collector, Swedish
Bahco scrubber tower, lime storage and handling system, clari-
fier (thickener), booster fan, sludge disposal pond, and asso-
ciated duct work, pumps, and controls.
Untreated flue gas from the individual boilers enters a
common header equipped with a bypass stack and is fed through a
mechanical collector where primary particulate removal takes
4-1
-------
TABLE 4-1. PROCESS INFORMATION FOR RICKENBACKER AIR FORCE BASE
Installation name
Installation location
Fuel characteristics
Total rating
Number of separate FGD units
Number of boilers
Source capacity
Control system vendor
Control process
Type of FGD system
Startup date
Control system status
S02 removal efficiencies
Particulate removal efficiency
Water makeup
Sludge or byproduct disposal
Rickenbacker Air Force Base
(Rickenbacker Air National Guard
Base)
Columbus, Ohio
Coal (3.6% sulfur)
55,000 scfm
1
6
210 x 106 Btu/h
Research-Cottrell/Bahco
Limestone or lime scrubbing
Retrofit
March 1976
Operational
90%+ design with lime operation;
lower with limestone operation
98% design
Open loop
Unstabilized CaS03/S04 sludge to
lined pond
4-2
-------
place. The mechanical collector has a design removal efficiency
of 70 percent and was installed primarily to reduce wear on the
booster fan, which is located immediately downstream. The fan
introduces the partially cleaned flue gas into the scrubbing
tower where S02 removal takes place.
The scrubber is a vertical tower consisting of two inverted
venturi scrubbing stages. Untreated gas is introduced into the
first stage, where it is diverted downward to impinge on the
liquid slurry surface of the mill. The gas then rises through
the first stage venturi, where it intimately mixes with the
slurry droplets now entrained in it. The partially scrubbed gas
is then diverted downward onto the liquid slurry surface in the
second stage pan, and the process is repeated. The treated gas
is then directed upward into a cyclonic mist eliminator where
entrained slurry droplets are removed, and then emitted through
a stub stack to the atmosphere.
The reagent for the scrubbing system is fine mesh limestone
or pebble lime slurry. Normally limestone is used, but for the
purpose of this test lime was employed. The reagent slurry is
introduced through the scrubbing system in a countercurrent
fashion.
The spent scrubbing solution is discharged to the thickener
where waste solids settle out. Thickener overflow is returned
to the mixing tank. Underflow from the thickener is discharged
to a 5-acre Hypalon-lined disposal pond located approximately
400 feet from the FGD system. Figure 4-1 is a flow diagram of
the Research-Cottrell (R-C)/Bahco scrubbing system.
4-3
-------
I .
REAGENT
SYSTEM
MODULE
REAGENT ^
FEEDER
AND SLAKER
LIME OR
LIMESTONE
TRUCK
UNLOADING
STATION
REAGENT
STORAGE
STACK
MAKEUP WATER *|,
MIST ELIMINATOR
2ND STAGE
OVERFLOW
TO LIME
DISSOLVING
TANK
THICKENER
SLUDGE
TO POND
BYPASS
MAKEUP
STACK
MECHANICAL
COLLECTOR
FLUE GAS
FROM HEAT
PLANT
TO FLY ASH
DISPOSAL
LIME
2ND
STAGE PUMP
MILL
PUMP
DISSOLVING
TANK
Figure 4-1. R-C/Bahco scrubbing system flow diagram.
-------
4.2 BACKGROUND INFORMATION
4.2.1 Boiler System
Seven stoker-fired boilers, each rated at 31 x 106 Btu/h
capacity were originally installed between 1954 and 1956. In
June 1977, a new stoker-fired boiler rated at 60 x 106 Btu/h
came into service to replace two of the older units, which have
now been demolished.
4.2.2 FGD System
The FGD system was retrofitted to the boiler system and was
placed in service in March 1976. It was manufactured by A.B.
Banco Ventilation of Enkoping, Sweden, and installed by
Research-Cottrell. Following initial testing using lime as a
scrubbing reagent, it has operated mainly on cheaper, less
reactive limestone, because such operation was sufficient to
meet local requirements for SO2 removal. From January 19 to
April 10, 1980, the system was operated with lime reagent, to
test the system at 90%+ removal efficiency.
4.3 PROCESS CONTROL DURING TEST
4.3.1 Boiler System
During the test the boiler system was operated in normal
fashion. Average total boiler load during data collection days
was 109 x 106 Btu/h, which is 52 percent of the total system
capacity. Generally, three to five boilers were sufficient to
meet heat demand during the period, with the remainder on
standby status.
4-5
-------
Coal for firing was loaded through underground transfer
chutes from the reserve coal pile or coal delivery trucks. The
coal was transferred to silos, with a 3- to 5-day residence time
before loading to the gravity hoppers at the boiler stokers.
Coal from the Broken Aro Mine in Ohio (Peabody Coal Company) was
supplied from reserves until February 7; truck deliveries from
Broken Aro then resumed and continued until February 28. From
February 7 to 28, truck deliveries were directly loaded to the
transfer silos. From February 29 onward, coal from the Horizon
Mine in Ohio (Yancy Minerals) was delivered and directly loaded
to the transfer silos. Some Broken Aro Coal was brought from
the reserve coal pile during early March, but the total quanti-
ty, equaling about a 1/2-day delivery, was insignificant.
Proximate assays of coal delivered during the test period are
listed in Table 4-2. The assay sheets are included in the
appendix in this volume.
4.3.2 FGD System
In addition to S02 emissions, parameters that are monitored
during normal operation include pressure drop, total gas flow,
gas temperature, pH, lime feed, water level, and slurry density.
The frequency and function of monitoring these parameters are
described in detail.
Pressure drop is tested across the two stages of the
scrubber. This serves as a diagnostic check; an increase in
pressure drop indicates scaling or plugging. The pressure drop
can be adjusted by changing the weir gate heights in the first-
4-6
-------
TABLE 4-2. ASSAYS OF COAL DELIVERED AND BURNED FROM JANUARY 16 TO MARCH 19
Date delivered
in 1980
1/16-1/17
1/17-1/29
2/7-2/15
2/15-2/28
2/29-3/6
3/6-3/14
Sulfur con-
tent (dry),3 %
2.9
3.0
3.9
3.7
2.3
3.1
Heating value (dry),3
Btu/lb
13,080
13,140
13,540
13,470
12,900
13,260
S02 emission rate,
lb/106 Btu
4.21
4.34
5.47
5.22
3.39
4.44
Mine
Horizon
Horizon
Date burned
in 1980
Stockpiled
Stockpiled
I ^
Broken Aroe 2/ll-2/19f
Broken Aro 2/19-3/3
Horizon
Horizon
3/3-3/109
3/10-3/19
* 3 See Assay Sheets in appendix.
-J Determined by the following equation:
S02 emission rate = 2 x
x
x (0.95)
where 2 = conversion of Ib S to Ib S02
0.95 = proportion factor for S02 conversion
106 heating value = conversion of Btu/lb to lb/106 Btu.
. Horizon coal supplied by Yancy Minerals.
Coal delivered and stockpiled; Broken Aro coal from yard burned; no assay of coal burned these
dates is available.
- Broken Aro coal supplied by Peabody Coal Co.
Four-day lag (average lag of 3 to 5 days) assumed.
' Some Broken Aro coal from yard burned.
-------
and second-stage level tanks. During the test period, however,
no changes in pressure drop were made.
Total gas _flow is measured at the scrubber inlet and is
normally recorded continuously. During the test period, the
transmitter supplying this data was malfunctioning. Consistent
gas flow rates were maintained by monitoring the amperage drawn
by the forced draft fan at the scrubber inlet.
Temperature levels are monitored at the scrubber inlet and
the scrubber bypass stack. High temperatures indicate the
passage of boiler flue gas at either point. Alarms, which are
set to activate when inlet temperatures fall below 300°F or when
bypass temperatures exceed 300°F, indicate probable boiler or
scrubber shutdown.
The pH levels are monitored continuously at the first
scrubber stage and at the dissolver tank. The metering system
does not operate any control loops, but activates alarms when
the pH at either point drops below 4. This alarm indicates that
a malfunction of the lime feed mechanism has probably occurred
and that remedial action is required. In conjunction with CEM
outputs, pH levels are used to adjust the lime feed for desired
S02 removal efficiency.
Pebble lime feed is regularly checked and recorded during
each shift. More frequent checks are indicated by changes in pH
or S02 emission levels. The feed system is designed to be
controlled through an automatic control loop by the outlet SC>2
analyzer. When S(>2 concentration exceeds 200 ppm, the system is
4-8
-------
designed to increase the lime feed. This control loop is not
normally used because of operational difficulties and was dis-
connected during the test.
System water levels are automatically readjusted when water
level drops in the lime dissolver tank. Makeup water is added
by spray nozzles above the second stage of the scrubber and
serves the secondary purpose of removing slurry buildup on the
inside walls of the scrubber.
Slurry density is monitored continuously at the mill below
the first stage of the scrubber. When slurry density exceeds 50
percent, waste sludge is automatically pumped to the pond.
During the test period, the lime feed rate from storage to
the slaker was the only significant control needed to achieve
desired S02 removal efficiency. Plant operators on all shifts
made periodic checks of the FGD performance, as evidenced by the
CEM output, and adjusted the lime feed rate as needed. Because
the CEM used a measuring range ratio of 10:1 for inlet and
outlet S02 readings and recorded them on the same chart, it was
easy for plant operators to note when adjustments were needed.
The only significant periods recorded during which the FGD
system did not operate at approximately 90% or better S02 re-
moval efficiency occurred when the lime feed rate control was
lost because of mechanical breakdown of the lime slaker .<
4-9
-------
SECTION 5
CONTINUOUS EMISSION MONITORING SYSTEM DESCRIPTION
The CEM consisted of an SO2 monitoring system permanently
installed at the plant with an O2 monitor temporarily installed
for the purpose of the test. Additional changes made to the
existing system included repositioning the inlet and outlet
probes to ensure sampling from centroid cross sectional areas of
the ducts, installation of recorders with greater data resolu-
tion than existing equipment, and installation of a calibration
gas delivery system. Figure 5-1 shows sampling locations in
regards to FGD process, and Figure 5-2 is a simplified schenuitic
of the CEM. This section describes the CEM components.
5.1 SAMPLING INTERFACE
The monitoring system utilized a DuPont 460 instrument
system to provide the extractive sample from both sampling
locations. Sample gas was pulled through a stainless steel mesh
filter screen inside the duct through a heated probe equipped
with a blowback system, and into a heated teflon sample line.
The samples were then drawn to the monitor, which was located in
the FGD system control room at ground level. The differentia-
tion between sampling the two different sample gas streams was
controlled automatically on a 10-minute cycle by the DuPont
5-1
-------
STACK
MIST ELIMINATOR
OUTLET PROBE
BYPASS
MAKEUP
STACK
MECHANICAL
COLLECTOR
FLUE GAS
FROM HEAT
PLANT
ANALYZERS
CALIBRATION TANKS
Figure 5-1. Sampling locations after modifications.
5-2
-------
ANALYSIS SYTEM OF CEM
SHIELDED
316 SS
MESH FILTER
HEAT
TRACING
MANUAL
THREE-WAY
VALVE
(IN STACK)
AUTOMATIC
THREE-WAY
VALVE
TWO-WAY SOLENOID
TEFLON
TUBING
4. TO
CALIBRATION
GAS
HEATED
SAMPLE
LINE TO
ANALYZER
HIGH-PRESSURE
AIR SUPPLY
PROBE ASSEMBLY
H-Cfc - -L
I- -0*3 - C
-C*] '
RAT
GAS CYLINDER
CONTROL
VALVES
ION SELECTION
FLOW CONTROL VALVE
TO MONITOR CALIBRATION
TO OUTLET
PROBE HEATED OUTLET SAMPLE! _
TO Il>
PRO
ASSE^
ASSEMBLY
!H.ET, HEATED INLET SAMPLE
1RLY
HEATED CABINET
PHOTO -»
DEJECTOR ^,
02
MONITOf
OUTLE
INLET
502 *""
SAMPLE
CELL
I
T(
1
VACUUM
GUAGEp)
rn
VACUUM] 1
REGULATOR
i HI
PRESSl
1
Ji
r
1
jj
1
^ My ii
/
pj_
GH-
JRE AIRL,!
1
I
1 " [
~T 1
U SAMPLE
A FLOW
A1 CONTROL i
T VALVES
_'T-_'TJ
_,' Fl Ft,
- j U ;
»_. % %
II T \\S^
UV
LIGHT
SOURCE
SAMPLE
SELECT
VALVES
MOISTURE
TRAPS
t I X »EXHAIW
MON?TOR |
CONTROL
UNIT
^AiTlNG01" ASPIRATOR(S)
\ND SIGNAL
T
S02 MONITOR
CONTROL UNIT
SINGLE-
POINT
RECORDER
DUAL-
POINT
RECORDER
Figure 5-2. Simplified schematic of CEM.
5-3
-------
unit. A sidestream sample for the oxygen monitor was taken from
the unit in a flow fashion parallel to the SO2 analysis cell.
The sample dewpoint was controlled by temperature-constant mist
knockout traps upstream from S02 and O2 analysis. The dewpoint
of SO2 samples were held at a maximum of approximately 120°F and
5 in. Hg vacuum; O2 sample dewpoints were held at a maximum of
68°F and 5 in. Hg vacuum.
5.2 S02 MONITOR
The SO2 monitor was a DuPont 460 analyzer, which measures
S02 by ultraviolet spectrophotometry. This is accomplished by
drawing a sample into a windowed cell, passing ultraviolet light
through the sample, and measuring the photometric output ob-
tained in a wavelength specific to SO2 absorption. Inlet and
outlet samples are differentiated by electronic track and hold
circuits that are actuated by the timing mechanism that controls
the sample flow. An automatic zeroing system operates on the
sample cycle, correcting for fluctuations and drift every 10
minutes.
5.3 O2 MONITOR
The O2 monitor was a Thermox WDG III analyzer, which mea-
sures O2 by electrochemical means across a heated zirconium
oxide cell. Sample gas flow was provided by the DuPont 460
unit. The inlet and outlet sample streams were differentiated
by the occurrence of a purge function in the 10-minute cycle,
which showed as an off-scale spike on the recorder chart.
5-4
-------
5.4 RECORDERS
Leeds and Northrup Speedomax recorders were used to collect
the data for the- S02 and O2 monitors. A dual-point recorder was
used for the SO2 data; a single-point recorder, for the O2 data.
The recorders were located in the FGD system control room with
the analyzers. Time-marked charts were used to simplify data
reduction.
5.5 CALIBRATION SYSTEM
A calibration system was used that included certified cali-
bration gas cylinders and a valving system to facilitate intro-
duction of gases to the CEM sampling interface. Zero, midscale
(50% scale), and span (90% scale) gas concentrations were pro-
vided for the ranges used in analysis (0 to 500 ppm SO2, 0 to
5000 ppm SO2, and 0 to 25% O2).
5-5
-------
SECTION 6
PROCEDURES AND CALCULATIONS
6.1 CONTINUOUS SO2 DATA COMPUTATIONS
Sulfur dioxide data computation was performed with a
Hewlett-Packard 3000 computer system. Raw data were loaded into
the program, and complete listing of emission rates and scrubber
efficiencies were printed out for the entire test period.
6.1.1 Activities Before Computer Run
Keypunch Card Preparation
Raw data were reduced and transcribed onto load sheets for
keypunching onto computer cards. Additional cards were prepared
to identify the data listings by location and date and to pro-
vide comments explaining cause and duration of data loss.
Comment cards were prepared by reference to CEM operator's
logs and strip charts. Raw data load sheets, containing 15-
minute listings of S02 and O2 data and moisture, calibration
data, and boiler information were prepared in the following
manner:
1. The S02 and O2 data were determined by processing raw
strip charts through the use of a data digitizing
device, which converted recorder deflections to digi-
tal values. The operation was manually performed,
with readings for inlet and outlet SO2 and O2 being
obtained and transcribed on a 15-minute basis.
6-1
-------
2. Moisture determinations for each parameter were
entered on the basis of availability of test data.
Separate determinations were entered for inlet and
outlet SO2 and O2. Separate determinations were also
made for SO2 and O2 analysis, because the O2 monitor
operated with an ambient temperature sample line,
which tended to remove some moisture.
3. Changes in monitor calibration caused by 24-hour drift
were compensated for by entering span gas readings for
each parameter on a 6-hour basis. These readings were
interpolated from calibration information.
4. Boiler heat rates were taken from plant operating
records, which contained summarized heat production
rates in terms of 106 Btu/h. These were calculated by
plant personnel as a determination from total boiler
pressure and temperature differentials. The values
were transcribed onto the load sheets on an hourly
basis.
Other Computer Entries
Calibration entries and boiler heat units were entered into
the program before data runs to differentiate the computation
from runs of other data using different values. Calibration
entries needed were assays of the span gases used to obtain the
readings keypunched with the data. The boiler heat unit entry
signalled the proper heading for the listing of heat rates to be
106 Btu/h.
6.1.2 Computation and Listing of Data
Data computation was performed once the cards were loaded
into the program, and listings were produced. Separate listings
were produced for 15-minute SO2 and O2 readings; 1-hour average
inlet emission rate (Ein), outlet emission rate (Eout), and
removal efficiency (Eff); and 24-hour average Ein, Eout, and
Eff. Listings also included total averages for 1-hour and
24-hour Ein, Eout, and Eff.
6-2
-------
15 Minute Listings
Complete 15-minute listings were prepared from the informa-
tion loaded on the cards. These listings presented the follow-
ing information:
1. Heading, identifying the source and date on each page
of listings.
2. Raw CEM data, corrected for calibration, but on a wet
basis, presented on a 15-minute basis.
3. Moisture data for each gas stream in percent H2O,
presented on a 15-minute basis.
4. Corrected CEM data, calculated by multiplying raw data
by the quantity 100/(100-M), where M equals the mois-
ture percent.
5. Average Ein, Eout, and Eff, calculated on an hourly
basis from average corrected S02 and O2 data. The
following equaitons were used:
Ib S02/106 Btu = (ppm S02 dj. )(9820) (1.64 x 10~7 ) x
(20.95)
(20.95 - % 02dry ) (Eg 6_1}
where 9820 = bituminous coal factor for dscf/106
Btu, utilizing excess air factor
1.64 x 10~7 = conversion of ppm S02 to Ib S02/dscf
20.95
(20.95 - % 02dry)
= excess air factor
Eff = -Eout x 100 (Eg. 6-2)
EI in
Two data points per hour were needed for a calculation
to be performed. Equation 6-1 was used to calculate
Ein and Eout, and Equation 6-2 was used to calculate
Eff.
6. Boiler information, printed in 106 Btu/h on an hourly
average basis.
6-3
-------
7. Comments, printed as entered in the appropriate loca-
tions to identify data loss periods.
8. Data loss periods, signified by repetition of previous
listed., number, or with the printing of ### symbols.
1-Hour and 24-Hour Listings and Averages
Hourly averages of Ein, Eout, and Eff and boiler heat rates
were obtained from calculations performed during computation of
15-minute listings. These were compiled to form hourly and
daily listings of data on a 1-hour and 24-hour averaging basis.
Each listing was summarized in a brief statistical format that
listed the data quantity base, minimum and maximum values, mean,
and standard deviation for each parameter. Total test averages
were grouped into time periods determined by a 30 day limitation
on data averaging. The individual listing and averaging pro-
cedures are described below:
1. Hourly listings were compiled for each 24-hour calen-
dar day with statistical determinations performed for
each parameter that had an occurrence of 75 percent or
greater (eighteen 1-hour averages per 24-hour day).
For each parameter that met the 75 percent data cap-
ture condition, the hourly and daily averages were
stored for future computation.
2. The total hourly averages from periods of 75 percent
data per day were run through statistical determina-
tions for each parameter. These computations were
performed for the groupings determined by the 30-day
data computation limitation. For determination of
30-day data, data days were included that listed 18 or
more hours of data capture for any parameter (exclud-
ing heat rates), even if FGD efficiency was not deter-
mined during a particular day.
3. The 24-hour listings and averages were performed for
the 30-day data groupings described above. All data
representing 18 or more hours of data capture per day
of Ein, Eout, or Eff were listed. Statistical deter-
minations were performed on the 30-day data groupings
independently and presented following each listing.
6-4
-------
6.2 PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATION TESTING
The P/S test procedures and calculations were in accordeince
with guidelines specified by Performance Specifications 2 and 3
in the Federal Register, Vol. 44, No. 197, October 10, 1979.
Manual Methods 3 and 6 were performed to complete system rela-
tive accuracy tests. In addition to the procedures outlined
below pertaining to the performance of these tests, procedures
were needed to ascertain CEM outputs correctly. The procedures
and calculations employed for determining CEM outputs in the
field are outlined in Section 6.5.
6.2.1 Calibration Gas Certification
All S02 and 02 calibration gases were traceable to NBS
standards. The procedures for establishing traceability are
outlined below.
Sulfur Dioxide Calibration Gas Certification
The S02 calibration gases were supplied with certificates
of analysis from the vendors establishing that the gases were
analyzed by an acceptable instrument technique using calibration
with NBS standards.
Oxygen Calibration Gas Certification
The O2 midrange (12%) was analyzed by ORSAT (EPA Method 3)
and found to have a value within 5 percent of the vendor's tag
value. The tag value was thus certified as acceptable. Ambient
air was used as an O2 span value calibration gas and needed no
certification testing to establish its oxygen concentration.
6-5
-------
6.2.2 Conditioning Period
The conditioning period was noted as beginning once the
complete CEM, as described in Section 5, was determined to be
fully operational. After 168 hours of continuous operation
without modification or maintenance except as specified as
routine and/or necessary by the CEM analyzer manufacturers, the
period was deemed successfully completed.
6.2.3 Operational Test Period
Because of the extensive nature of the P/S testing (involv-
ing two complete sets of tests) and the short period of data
acquistion (spanning less than 2 months), no distinct period of
168 hours was set aside, and the entire period of data acquisi-
tion was involved in operation testing. The QA testing was in
providing continuity between initial and final P/S testing. The
P/S tests procedures followed during this period are outlined
below.
Calibration Error--
Both operational ranges of the SO2 monitor and the single
operational range of the 02 monitor were involved in this test.
Calibration values of midrange and span gases were used as
determined in Section 6.2.2. The individual checks were per-
formed by running zero, midrange, and span gases in random order
through the monitors until five complete sets (15 data points)
for each operating range were obtained. Figure 6-1 presents a
sample data sheet and the equations used to determine calibra-
tion error.
6-6
-------
Run
no.
1
I
3
4
S
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
IS
Calibration {as
concentration,
ppm
A
Measurtmnt ijrsten
rtadlng,
ppm
B
Arithmetic Hean
Confidence Interv»l
Calibration trror
Arithmetic
differences,
P(m
A-B
Mid
High
Arithmetic Mean (AM) = g-
95% Confidence
Interval (CIg5)
Calibration Error
|AM|
RV
where
"0.975
x = arithmetic difference, ppm
n = number of data points
RV = calibration gas concentration, ppm
t value as shown below
na
2
3
4
5
6
'0.975
12.706
4.303
3.182
2.776
2.571
na
7
8
9
10
11
'0.975
2.447
2.365
2.306
2.262
2.228
na
12
13
14
15
16
^.975
2.201
2.179
2.160
2.145
2.131
Values are already corrected for n-1
degrees of freedom; use n equal to
the number of individual values.
Figure 6-1. Sample data sheet and equations for the determination of
calibration error.
6-7
-------
System Response Time
Both SO2 operating ranges and the single O2 operating range
were checked for response time. The procedure entailed the
alternating introduction of zero and span gases into the system
and the recording of elapsed time between introduction and a
stable reading. During the tests, gases were introduced to the
sampling interface at the probe mountings, so that the response
time included any lag caused by the sample line length. Gas
flow rates during these tests were consistent with normal
sampling procedures. Three sets of zero-to-span and span-to-
zero checks were performed for each parameter. Response from
either span or zero calibration gas to flue gas was not used
because of minute-to-minute variability of flue gas readings,
leading to inconsistent results. Figure 6-2 presents a sample
data sheet and the equations used to determine system response
time.
2-Hour Zero and Calibration Drift
Both SO2 operating ranges and the single O2 operating range
were tested to determine 2-hour drift. The strategy was to
introduce consecutively zero and span gas at 2-hour intervals
until 15 sets of data were obtained. Figure 6-3 presents a
sample data sheet and the equations used.
24-Hour Zero and Calibration Drift
Both SO2 operating ranges and the single O2 operating range
were tested to determine 24-hour drift. Initial readings were
6-8
-------
Date
High-level
ppm
Test Run
1
2
3
Average
Upscale,
m1n
A
Downscale,
m1n
B
System Response Time (slower of A and B). m1n.
Average
(Slower of A and B) x 10° - 15%; otherwise retestlng is required.
where
x = individual response, minutes
n = number of test runs (3)
Figure 6-2. Sample data sheet and equations for determination of
system response time.
6-9
-------
Mtl
let
*>.
1
Z
3
4
S
6
7
e
9
10
11
12
13
14
IS
fcte
Time
Begin
End
Zero
In1t.
A
Ug
Fin.
B
Arithmetic *>"
Confidence Inttnril
Zero Drift
Zero
drift
C-B-A
Ml -level
«dq
n(t.
D
Fin.
E
Spin
drift
F-t-t
bllbntton
Ctllb.
drift
6-F-C
drift
Arithmetic Mean (AM) = ^-
95% Confidence
Interval (C195)
Zero or Calibration
Drift (S02 monitor)
Zero or Calibration
Drift (02 monitor)
*-Q.97S
x2)
|AM| + CI
95
RV
x 100
wnere
x
n
Zero RV
Calibration RV
0.975
0.25
(|AM| + CI95) x 0.25
individual drift, %
number of data points (IS)
total scale. % (100)
calibration gas assay multi-
plied by 100 and divided by
the range, ppm
t value as shown below
conversion of * scale to t 0,
n4
2
3
4
5
6
t0975
12.706
4.303
3.182
2.776
2.571
nd
7
8
9
10
11
t0.975
2.447
2.365
2.306
2.262
2.228
nd
12
13
14
15
16
t0.975
2.201
2.179
2.160
2.145
2.131
* Values are already corrected for n-1
degrees of freedom; use n equal to
the number of Individual values.
Figure 6-3. Sample data sheet and equations for determination of
2-hour zero and calibration drift.
6-10
-------
obtained for each 24-hour period by calibrating each instrument
and recording the zero and span readings after calibration.
Final readings were obtained by recording the precalibration
zero and span readings on the following day. A complete set of
data for 24-hour drift determination consisted of seven consecu-
tive 24-hour drift determinations. Figure 6-4 presents a sample
data sheet and the equations used.
System Relative Accuracy
System relative accuracy tests consisted of comparing CEM
and reference method determined emission rates in Ib SO2/106
Btu. The CEM determinations were obtained by utilizing inte-
grated averages of monitor output. Reference method deter-
minations were obtained using Methods 6 and 3 for SO2 and O2.
Moisture determinations were performed with Reference Method 6
to enable comparison of CEM and reference method results on a
dry basis. Guidelines provided by Performance Specification 2
in the Federal Register, Vol. 44, No. 197, October 10, 1979,
were followed.
1. Reference Method 6 samples were collected in an inte-
grated sampling train from a probe situated in the
same cross-sectional centroidal area (<5% stack dia-
meter) as the CEM probe tip. Reference Method 3 bag
samples were collected from the same sampling point.
2. Nine conccurrent Reference Method 3 and 6 tests were
performed to complete each set of system relative
accuracy data. At any given sampling site (inlet or
outlet of FGD system), no more than one test per hour
was allowed. The tests were performed when the CEM
was in the normal data collecting mode, without inter-
ference from 2-hour drift, calibration error, response
6-11
-------
Oati
set
no.
1
2
3
4
S
6
7
Date
T1m
teg In
"
1
End
Zen
InH.
A
Rdq
Mn.
B
Arithmetic Mean
Confidence Interval
Zero drift
Zero
drift
C-B-A
Hi-level
Rdg
Inlt.
D
Fin.
E
Span
drift
F-E-0
Calibration
i»r1ft
Callb.
drift
G«F-<
Arithmetic Mean (AM) =
95£ Confidence
Interval (CI
g5
Zero or Calibration
Drift (S02 monitor)
Zero or Calibration
Drift (02 monitor)
|AM| + CI
g5
RV
x 100
(|AM| + CIg5) x 0.25
where x = individual drift, %
n = number of data points (7)
Zero RV = total scale, % (100)
Calibration RV = calibration gas assay multi-
plied by 100 and divided by
the range, ppm
*0 975 = * va^ue as shown below
0.25 « conversion of % scale to % Oo
n*
2
3
4
5
6
^.975
12.706
4.303
3.182
2.776
2.571
na
7
8
9
10
11
V975
2.447
2.365
2.306
2.262
2.228
n4
12
13
14
15
16
^.975
2.201
2.179
2.160
2.145
2.131
Values are already corrected for n-1
degrees of freedom; use n equal to
the number of Individual values.
Figure 6-4. Sample data sheet and equations for determination of
24-hour zero and calibration drift.
6-12
-------
time, or 24-hour calibration tests. Samples were
synchronized with CEM 10-minute sampling cycles to
allow three separate CEM measurements to be averaged
for each test.
3. The CEM data were determined from recorded strip
charts in terms of SO2 and O2 concentration on a wet
basis. Three readings of each were averaged for each
test. Reference Method 6 moisture data were used
(after correction for CEM dewpoint) to convert CEM SO2
and O2 readings to a dry basis. Emission rates in
terms of Ib S02/106 Btu were then determined by Equa-
tion 6-1. The CEM and reference method data and
calculated emission rates were recorded, and correla-
tions were determined on data sheets. Figure 6-5
presents a sample data sheet and the equations used to
determine system relative accuracy.
6.3 DETERMINATION OF FACTORS ACCOUNTING FOR DATA CAPTURE AND
LOSS PERIODS
6.3.1 FGD Determinations
Operability, reliability, availability, and utilization
represent different facets of FGD system operations, including
excursions, in terms of percentages. The calculations used to
determine them are presented below:
1 Ooerabilitv = hours FGD operated Q
i. operaDiiity hourg boiler operated x 10U
2. Reliability = hours FGD operated
J hours called on to operate
3. Availability = hours FGD capable of operation
hours in period
4. utUization =
For data capture, only normal operations were considered,
and FGD excursions were excluded. Operability as determined by
this limitation is calculated as follows:
Normal Operability = Operability - [ 12l~«-i-£SSi««l x 10Q]
6-13
-------
Run
no.
-1
2
3
4
S
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Date and
time
Average
SO,
RK
M inm
ppm
Confidence Interval
Accuracy
°? '
RM I M
%
so?
RM
M hiff
wss/OCV
r~
RM - reference method result; M - monitoring system result; and
mass/GVC - mass per gross caloric value, lb/10» Btu.
Average (A)
rx
n
95% Confidence
Interval (CI
g5
- (ix)
Accuracy
CI
95
RV
x 100
where
x
n
RV
10.975
individual result
number of data points
average of reference method results
t value as shown below
na
2
3
4
5
6
to. 975
12.706
4.303
3.182
2.776
2.571
na
7
8
9
10
11
t0.975
2.447
2.365
2.306
2.262
2.228
na
12
13
14
15
16
t0.975
2.201
2.179
2.160
2.145
2.131
Values are already corrected for n-1
degrees of freedom; use n equal to
the number of Individual values.
Figure 6-5. Sample data sheet and equations for determination of
system relative accuracy.
6-14
-------
6.3.2 CEM Operability Determinations
Inlet operability represents the capability of the CEM
inlet sampling system to gather data. The determination in-
cludes data capture during periods of excursions and is calcu-
lated as follows:
CEM inlet operability . <' .£££**> x 100
Outlet operability represents the capability of the CEM
outlet sampling system to gather data. The determination does
not consider FGD operation during excursions and is calculated
as follows:
.,.., ., . _ (hours of outlet data) __ , An
oper^biUty = (FGD hours - hours of excursions x 10°
6.4 QUALITY ASSURANCE
The QA procedures were designed to provide the most consis-
tency with P/S procedures that was practicable. The 24-hour
drift determinations and system relative accuracy tests were
performed in the same manner as in P/S testing, but the report-
ing of QA system relative accuracy differed because of the
abbreviated nature of the weekly data (only three tests per week
for QA compared with nine for P/S). Moisture determinations
were performed in the same manner as during P/S testing and,
because of the wet gas CEM analysis system, provided a vital
data parameter for final data listings. The QA tests are
described below.
6-15
-------
6.4.1 24-Hour Drift Tests
The 24-hour drift tests were performed in exactly the same
manner as P/S tests; the results were based on daily calibration
information collected from January 25 through March 18. Sub-
section 6.2.3 explains the procedures and calculations used.
Weekly results are listed.
6.4.2 System Relative Accuracy Tests
The system relative accuracy tests were performed on a
weekly basis by virtually the same test procedures outlined in
Subsection 6.2.3. The only difference was in the reporting of
data results. Because a relatively small (three-point) data
base was provided for each test, averages of results were re-
ported on a weekly basis, with no utilization of a 95 percent
confidence interval.
6.4.3 Moisture Determinations
Manual Method 6 test moisture data gathered during P/S and
QA testing provided the base for moisture determinations.
Providing accurate values for use in correcting CEM data re-
quired assaying the mositure at the point of analysis; thus,
removal of moisture between extraction from stack and analysis
had to be accounted for. This was done according to the fol-
lowing equations:
percent moisture = lowest of A or B (Eg. 6-3)
where A = stack moisture, percent
B = dewpoint moisture, percent
6-16
-------
percent dewpoint moisture = partial pressure of H?O a+t 1QO
e pressure of system
(Eq. 6-4)
where t = lowest temperature of interface
before analysis point
pressure of
system = 25 in. Hg
Equations 6-3 and 6-4 had to be applied to each monitor as well
as to each gas stream, because the monitor configuration re-
sulted in different lowest-point temperatures in the 02 and S02
sampling interfaces. In all cases the lowest calculated mois-
ture value was reported. The lowest temperature of the O2
monitor interface was room temperature (68°F) because unheated
lines were used to transfer sample gas to the 02 monitor. The
lowest temperature of the SO2 monitor interface was measured on
a daily basis at the mist knockout traps provided with the
DuPont 460 system and generally exceeded 100°F. System pressure
was assumed to be 25 in. Hg for determining partial pressure of
moisture, based on 5 in. Hg vacuum and 30 in. Hg average atmos-
pheric pressure.
Special moisture determinations were performed downstream
from the outdoors sample lines during a period when cold temper-
atures apparently cooled sample lines to below the DuPont 460
knockout trap temperature dewpoint, as evidenced by no con-
densate collection. These tests were performed by diverting
sample gas from the analyzer and passing a measured volume of
the gas through preweighed silica gel. Care was taken during
these tests to approximate closely normal sampling flow rates
and cycles to minimize variations that might cause different
condensation rates in the sample lines.
6-17
-------
6.5 DETERMINATION OF CEM OUTPUT IN THE FIELD
The values used to convert raw data to final output read-
ings in terms of emission rates had to be determined in the
field to provide data for performance specificaiton and QA. It
was important that the field values be accurately determined and
reflect the values transcribed for the final listings (Subsec-
tion 6.1) in order that field test data reflect the quality of
the final data listings. The procedures used for reducing CEM
data in the field are outlined below:
Reading of Raw Strip Charts
Scale deflection percentages were read from strip charts
and used without conversion to parts per million of SO2 or
percentages of 02 for system response and drift tests. For
calibration error and system relative accuracy tests, conversion
of scale deflections (averages of three points for system rela-
tive accuracy) were multiplied by the appropriate span gas assay
and divided by the last previous span gas reading to make this
conversion, as indicated by the following equation:
ppm SO2 or % O2 = reading, % of scale x (Eq. 6-5)
assay of span gas
span gas reading, % of scale
Determination of Dry Concentrations
Dry S02 and O2 concentrations had to be determined to
correlate CEM and manual methods data during system relative
accuracy tests. This was accomplished by multiplying raw data
6-18
-------
values by the factor 100/(100 - M), where M is the appropriate
moisture content. The M values for inlet SO2, inlet 02, outlet
SO2, and outlet..02 were determined separately, as discussed in
Subsection 6.3.3.
6.6 DETERMINATION OF PARTICULATE AND NO CONCENTRATIONS
X
Particulate and NO concentrations were determined to
J^
characterize the effects of the FGD system on these two para-
meters. Approved sampling techniques and representative process
operation were needed during the tests to obtain representative
concentrations. The following procedures were followed to
ensure this:
1. Plant personnel were consulted to ensure that the
tests were not performed during process upsets (e,g.,
soot blowing, changing of boiler load, etc.).
2. Process operations were observed by field personnel
during the tests to ensure that any unexpected upsets
were noted.
3. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Reference
Methods 5 and 7 were used to perform the particulate
and NO tests.
Jv
4. Representative sampling locations were chosen, as
discussed in Subsection 6.2 and illustrated in Figures
3-1 and 3-2.
5. Inlet and outlet samples were taken concurrently to
ensure representativeness of samples to the same gas
stream.
Procedures, apparatus, and calculations used during the tests
are presented in Appendix C.
6-19
-------
APPENDIX
CALIBRATION GAS CERTIFICATION
AND FGD INFORMATION
A-l
-------
CONTENTS
Page
Calibration Gas Certification A-3
Coal Assay Analyses A-10
1-Hour and 24-Hour Data Listings (January 25 through
March 1, 1980) A-15
Data Frequency Distributions (January 25 through
March 1, 1980) A-54
1-Hour and 24-Hour Data Listings (March 2 through
March 19, 1980) A-70
Data Frequency Distributions (March 2 through March 19,
1980) A-90
A-2
-------
LIQUID CARBONIC
SubsiHiur ol Houaon Niiutil Cti Coifamion
SPECIALTY GAS and CHEMICAL PRODUCTS
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Pedco Environmental
Date:
3-6-80
11499 Chester Road
Gincinnatif Ohio ^ 5274 6
Attention; Steve Howie
Ref. # . ..-- -,
x"'
Curt. P.O. * /fel?9-l69-333-X
Product
Cyl. Serial
No.
SiAL 2328
i"
Cyl. Serial
No.
Cyl. Serial
No.
Opponents
Requested
r Dioxide
NBtrogen
Balance
Actual
Balance
Actual
Actual
Cyl. Volume
Valve No.
150 cf.
660
Total Cyl. Pressure 2000-csi.
Mthod of Analysis:
_ Gas Chromat.ngrapby
2521pprn
N
Certified By:
John Sdv/ards
A-3
FORM St-02991 REV. 9/72
It is recommended the above cylinders not be depleted
below 50 psig unless otherwise indicated.
PRINTED IN U.S.A.
-------
LIQUID CARBONIC
Subsidiary of Houxton Ntturil C»t Corpora/on
SPECIALTY GAS and CHEMICAL PRODUCTS
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
To:
Pedco Environmental
1 1/.|.Q
Cincinnati, Ohio 45246
Attention; St.pyp Hnwi
Date: .
Ref. #
Cust. P.O. #
3-6-80
79-169-333-X
Product
Cyl. Serial
No.
SGAL 2312
Cyl. Serial
No.
Cyl. Serial
No.
Components
Sulfur Dioxide
Nitrogen
Requested
250ppm
Balance
Actual
254ppm
Balance
Actual
Actual
Cyl. Volume
CGA Valve No.
150 cf.
Total Cyl. Pressure
Method of Analysis:
Gas Chromatography
TlRin''' T\'BS St. an rig Trio
486ppm S02/Bal. N
2521ppm S02/Bal. K
Certified By:
John Edv.'ards
A-4
ORM St-02991 REV. 9/72
It is recommended the above cylinders not be depleted
below 50 psig unless otherwise indicated.
PRINTED IN U.S.A.
-------
LIQUID CARBONIC
SubsiftiWY of Houtton N»tt#»l Git
SPECIALTY GAS and CHEMICAL PRODUCTS
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
TVivi rnnrnprrhpl
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, Ohio 45246
Date: .
Ref. #
1-6-80
Cust. P.O. / P5I79-164-333-X
At.t.orrhi on . SJ-.PVP Knv-.n
Product
Cyl. Serial
No.
3 GAL 2331
Gas I.lixture
Cyl. Serial
No.
Cyl. Serial
No.
q^nponents
flfur Dioxide
trogen
Requested
200Cppra
Balance
Actual
2000pprn
Balance
Actual
Actual
Cyl. Volume
IA Valve No. 660
Total Cyl. Pressure
2000psi
Athod of Analysis:
Using i:3S Standards
486ppm 302/Bal. N
2521ppm S
Certified By: John 3d wards
FORM St-02991 REV. 9/72
A-5
it is recommended the above cylinders not be depleted
below 50 psig unless otherwise indicated.
PRINTED IN U.S.A.
-------
LIQUID CARBONIC
Subuditty ol Houtton Ntturtl Gu Cotpoetlion
SPECIALTY GAS and CHEMICAL PRODUCTS
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
To: Fec'.oo Znvironmentnl Inc.
Rnari
Cincinnati, Ohio ^5246
nn ;
Date:
3-6-80
Ref. #
Cust. P.O. # P3I79-l6fr-333-X
Product
Cyl. Serial
No.
SGAL 2330
Cyl. Serial
No.
Cyl. Serial
No.
Components
Sulfur DioxiGc
;\itro;-:en
Requested
Balance
Actual
Balance
Actual
Actual
Cyl. Volume
CGA Valve No.
150 cf.
Total Cyl. Pressure
Method of Analysis:
Gas Chrornatngrflphy
I rt Q v»ri r-
6ppra S02/iial
2521 ppia SOg/Bal
Certified By:
John L'dwards
A-6
FORM St-02991 REV. 9/72
It is recommended the above cylinders not be depleted
below 50 psig unless otherwise indicated.
PRINTED IN U.S.A.
-------
3333
DRY MOLECULAR WEIGHT DETERMINATION
// ->
PLANT f-V '-' ' CV.V
DATF /^' /7~V/
COMMENTS:
TE ST NO
SAMPLING TIME (24-hr CLOCK)
SAMPLING LOCATION .£.
SAMPLE TYPE (BAG, INTEGRATED, CONTINUOUS).
ANALYTICAL METHOD _££H±
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE.
OPERATOR ^/V 5^
.ORSAT LEAK CHECKED
^-x^^ RUN
GAS ^^^^
C02
02(NET IS ACTUAL 02
READING MINUS ACTUAL
C02 READING)
CO(NET IS ACTUAL CO
READING MINUS ACTUAL
02 READING)
N 2 (NET IS 100 MINUS
ACTUAL CO READING)
1
ACTUAL
READING
JO
/?, 75
NET
J9
>y.6o
2
ACTUAL
READING
O.oo
$*>*
NET
0.00
/J.»<3
3
ACTUAL
READING
O . A fc
AAo
NET
: . a t
^^
AVERAGE
NET
VOLUME
«:!,o5
yp.^
MULTIPLIER
44/100
32/100
28/iQO
a/ioo
TOTAL
MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF
STACK GAS (DRY BASIS)
Md, Ib'lb-mole
. -'/
^J3A
>
-------
Afl
DRY MOLECULAR WEIGHT DETERMINATION
PLANT.
DATE.
,, r. >-,0
2
ACTUAL
READING
6/60
13 fr
NET
. A
a£o
3
ACTUAL
READING
o.eo
< ~\
NET
4.**
/:.<>>
AVERAGE
NET
VOLUME
0.'»
/* j 3
MULTIPLIER
44/100
32/100
1m
a/100
TOTAL
MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF
STACK GAS (DRY BASIS)
Md, Ib/lb-mole
n> '" C
y. c /
00
-------
>
DRY MOLECULAR WEIGHT DETERMINATION
353 i Afi
PLANT
DATE l>.|7
Ti.
SAMPLING TIME (24 hr CLOCK).
SAMPLING LOCATION * A P.
SAMPLE TYPE (BAG, INTEGRATED, CONTINUOUS).
ANALYTICAL METHOD _
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE.
OPERATOR
.ORSAT LEAK CHECKED S
^^^^ RUN
GAS ^^^^
C02
(tyNET IS ACTUAL 02
READING MINUS ACTUAL
C02 READING)
CO(NET IS ACTUAL CO
READING MINUS ACTUAL
02 READING) ,
N£ {NET !S 100 MINUS
ACTUAL CO READING)
1
ACTUAL
READING
Q.OO
/mo
NET
),oo
M 1 fi
!-\ /J
2
ACTUAL
READING
0,^0
/«?. 7<
NET
c. c>°
P.-r-'V
3
ACTUAL
READING
' '-
/P. 7*
NET
i- ,*y
;r.7J
AVERAGE
NET
VOLUME
c. ,---
'.J,7\
MULTIPLIER
4VlOO
32/100
28/100
a/ioo
TOTAL
MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF
STACK GAS (DRY BASIS)
Md, Ib'lb-mole
o.cc
4 ." 'I
/ * i
-------
DIVISION
COAL SAMPLING AND INSPECTION OFFICE
4800 FORBES AVENUE
PITTSBURGH. PENNSYLVANIA 15213
.S. AIR FORCE
iN AtlTONIO ALC-SFSC
LLLY AFB, TEXAS 782H1
February 25, 1980
G*ntlemen/Ladies:
The analysis of the umpie submitted by Rickenbacker Air Force Base, Ohio
covering 97^.38 to"»°f 1^ Inch by \ Inch coal ddrmed on your
contract No. DLA-600-79-D-l6?6 and Item No. 9
by Yancey Minerals ea 1/10-17 ,19 80 fcMroOo«>:
U«iit,.~
V^lflil* nutter
Ath
To'?'
S^rffvf
AS RECEIVED
10.0
11780
DRY COAL
11.6
49.1-
9.3
100.0
2. -9
13080
This information is for the use of (he Government and the dealer or operator furnishing the coal. It
is confidential until it t$ published by the U. S. Government.
Sample No.
Lib No. K99^17 Mine Horizon, Ohio
Sampler No. 1 Ash-Softening temp.
RRcarNos. . Truck Delivery
F3.L
Remarks:
Can
Analysis supervised by
f ORR6ST E. WALKER
A-10
Sincerely youn.
A. WELSH
-------
COAL SAMPLING AND INSPF.CTION OFFICE
4800 FOKKF.S AVENUE
PriTSlllMGH. PENNSYLVANIA 15213
February 25,
Gentlemen/Ladies:
»
Thr analysis of the sample submitted by Rickenbacker Air Force Base, Ohio
'covering 977.68 lonsof
contract NJ. DLA-600-79-D-1 676
by Yancey Minerals
Inch by k. Inch corf delivered on your
»"d Item No. 9
°" 1/17-29 .1980 basfollow:;:
MnicM.ro
V«T,|:Vm,»,,
Fjtrri rifhnn
To f *j 1
c,,,.
Bniish ih-rnwl units
AS RECEIVED
8.5
12030
DRY COAL
11.6
9.3
100.0
3.0-
13110
This information is for the use of the Government and the dejler or operator furnishing the coal. It
is confidential until it is published by the U. S. Government.
Sample No.
Lab. No. K99^l8 Mine Horizon, Ohio
Sampler No. 1 Ash-Softening temp.
RKcarNos. Truck Delivery..
Degrees F.
F.S.I.
Remjrki
Can #2320
Anal>\is supr.xsed by
FOKHEST E WALKEH
l>r-^.-i/ 11 <**>tr. Coal Anatnit
A-ll
Sincerely yours.
ROBERT A. WELSH
Coal S«nv/i'i{ fnJ InlprctiO*
-------
.. - --
MI A:.:-. '.MO Ai.e
riU Y A:-1!-, TKXA
732 Vl
COAL PREPARATION DIVISION
COAL SAMPLING AND INSPECTION OFFICE
4SOO FORBES AVENUE
PITTSBURGH. PENNSYLVANIA 15213
April 2, I960
Gentlemen/Ladies:
The an.«!ysis of the sample submitted by Rickenbacker Air Force Base, Ohio
covering 989.15 lonsof I3u Inch by \ Inch coal delivered on your
contract No. DLA-600-79-D-1663 and Item No. 4
by Peibody Coal CD-r.-.ar.v on 2.7-1;; .I960
Wniv'iif- , ,
Vnlaliip matt»r
FjucH r3fhf«p
A^S
Tof-,1
«:,jf.,r
Rrifi^ fh?rmjt units
AS RECEIVED
r f
~ "s
12610
DRV COM
«
^5.8
^7.7
6.5
100.0
* *
3.9
. -135^10
This information is for the use of the Government and the dealer or operator furnishing the coa!. It
is confidential until it is published by the U. S. Government.
Sample No. 7
Sampler No. 1
Lab.No.;L00268 Mine Broken Aro, Ohio
Ash-Softening temp. Degrees F. F.S.I.
i'ruck Delivery
Remarks:
Can #2140
Analysis supervised by
FORHESf E.WALKER
/ m cHtrft. Coal Aaalynt
A-12
Sincerely yours.
ROBERT A. WELSH
Coal 54fft/>/inf and IniprctiOH
-------
782*il
in v
CUAI. SAMI'LIM! AN!> INDUCTION OFFICE
4800 FOUUKS AVENUK
PltTSBURGH. PENNSYLVANIA 15213
April 2, 1930
Gentlemen/Ladies:
The analysis of the sample submitted by Rickenbacker Air Fors-3 Base, Ohio
covering 981-5*1 tonsof 1^ Inch by \ Inch coal delivered on y;
contract No. DLA-600-79-D-1663 and Ite:n
by Peabody Coal Company on 2/15-28
Volatile rpit'*r.. _ . . .
Strffur .
Hriti*>. therjpil lmi**
AS RECEIVED
S.6 .
12380
.1980 is as follows:
DRY COAL
*48.6
6.6
100.0
3.7
13JJ70
This information is for the use of the G.overnme nt and the dealer or operator furnishing the coal. It
is confidential until it is published by the U. S. Government.
Sample So. 8
Lab.No. . L00269 Mine Broken Aro., Ohio
Sampler No.- 1 Ash-Softening temp.
RRcarNos. 7ruck Delivery
Degrees F.
F.S.I.
Remark*
Can #2^73
Analysis supervised by
FORREST E.WALKER
it chtrft.
A-13
Sincerely yours.
ROBERT A. WELSH
Coal Stitpttnf tnJ Intprciion
-------
>AL SAMl'UNG AND INSPECTION OFFICE
4800 FORBES AVENUE .
PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA 15213
.S. AIR FOKCt:
AN ANTONIO ALC-SPSC
-:LLY APH, TEXAS 7821*1 -
April 21, 1980
Gentlemen/Ladies:
The analysis of the sample submitted by Rickenbacker AFB, Ohio
covering 979.80 «««of l»q Inch by 0
contract No. DLA-600-79-D-1676 and Item No. 9
by Yancy Minerals on 3/6-1 'I .1980
coal delivered on your
is as follows:
MniO *
Vnl,t;l» miff"
Fji^d rifhnn
Tofil
Briiivli thrrmil nni'< . _
AS RECEIVED
9.3
12030
DRY COAL
^7.0
8.2'
100.0 .
3.1
13260
This information is for the use of the Qovernmrnt and the dealer or operator furnishing the coal. It
is confidential until it is published by the U. S. Government.
Sample No. 9 Lib. So. L00671
Sampler No. 1 Ash-Softening temp.
RRcarNos. Truck Delivery
Mine Horizon-Ohio
Degrees F.
F.S.1.
Remsrks: Can #2^59
Analysis supervised by
FORREST E.WALKER
e. Coel A*alvtit
A"14
Sincerely yours.
KOBERT A. WELSH
Cotl Simptin
-------
DAILY SUMMARY OF KESULTS
>r
4
1
4
»
7"
0
10
1 1
12
13
14
16
!
17
!
I*
£O
ai
22
a»
24
2&
2*
27
2»
!
JO
31
32
33
34
39
36
37
30
30
4O
41
42
« j
44
43
"
«'
4O
1
Ay
,1'J
» .
Sir
!ia
'-.4
t
LOCATION: RICHENBACKEK AFB i960
OATEI i-25-eo
TIME
0
100
AAA
300
400
500
600
700
MOO
900
1000
. _1JUO - ....
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
>-17ftQ_
' 1600
£l900
2AOO
2100
2200
£300
« AVERAGES
X OF DATA
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
... ME AM. ...
STO.DEV.
X STO.OEV.
LOAD E E
IN OUT
*«« »**»*» «««««
99. 4.961 .t>0b
9a. *tf*7 j"01
105. 4.634 .307
105. 4. 4Mb .3IU
XU5.. tt.bbl .106
99. 4.553 .226
99. 4.719 .243
l|k. «,^.j>^ .264
109. 4.591 .222
109. 4.465 .230
. .115., .S.i77 .JJ6U
118. 4.402 .455
116. **«»» ***
ID«, 4,«fc4 .'Of
109. 4.315 .459
103. »«« «**«*
103. «»««»« n»na»a
104. 4.751 .732
104. 5.082 .flld
Dfc, A.QXk . 7«iH
106. 4.913 .066
106. 4.949 .029
... .Lfife* i.USJL .631
23. 20. 20.
96T AS. A).
99. 4.315 .222
116. 5.084 .866
107.
40
41
42
43
44
40
4«
47
48
4»
SO
1
2
3
4
5
e
S7
sa
5B
oo
61
<2
.3
A 4
t*
6O
*7
«a
ee
7O
71
7i
73
74
73
V
-------
DAILY SUMMARY OF
LOCATION: RICKENBACKEK AFB i960
DATES 1-26-80
TIME
" 0
100
200
300
400
.... .500. ....
600
700
aoo
900
1000
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
'Ie6°
£1900
2000
2100
2200
2300
« AVERAGES
X OF DATA
U t kl t UIIU
LOAD
105.
105.
105.
98.
96T
105.
1 17.
119.
117.
no!
109.
109.
106.
99 *~
99.
99.
105.
105.
105^.
24.
100,
t
IN
4.641"
5.060
5.001
4.994
4.960
H.9Q5
4.932
4.917
A.A07
4.664
4.962
5.002
4.964
5.142
5.201
.5.. 269
5.219
5.116
5.314
5.295
5.201
24.
100.
fc
OUT
.764
.647
.585
.654
... .oaa
.630
.716
."11
.557
.519
.499
.381
T1QH
.396
.364
*,,,
.462
.444
.356
.446
24.
100T
tFF
63.0
67.2
09. «
06.3
66.8
Bb.Q .._ .
63.2
65.4
*n,a
06.6
09.5
90*0
92.3
92.3
93.0
... 9J.6
92.0
91.0
91. 5
93.3
91.6
90.7
24.
100.
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MtAJ*
STO.DEV.
X 3TD.OEV.
98.
119.
7.
6.
4.641
5.314
.336 63.180
.630 93.621
.146 .149
2.929 27.97*
3.206
3.567
24-HOUR REMOVAL EFICItNCY USING
1
. fc « f ...
1 IN OUT
I
NOTES (MEAN) IS DEFINED ASS
X
. THE MtAN FOB .X...QA..YS USING T-HUUK AVtRAGtS
IO
II
12
IS
17
t*
18
2O
21
22
U
24
23
28
27
4«
47
48
" 4»
30
Bl
54
BB
Bfl
"B7
no
BB
BO
A3
SB
B7
72
" 73
-------
DAILY SUMMARY OF HESULTS
LOCATION: RICKENBACKEK AFb I9»o
DATES 1*27-80
TIME
0
100
?aa
300
QUO
500
600
700
nan
900
1000
110.0 .. . .
1200
1300
i«nn
1500
1600
> we. .
i v»oo
£ i««o
^ lOOa
2100
2200
2.300
« AVERA6E8
X OF DAIA
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MEAN
! STD.OEV.
S STD.DEV.
24-HOUR REMOVAL
1
IM.EANJ E i E
1 IN
'
»
LOAD E t
IN OUT
114. 5.175 .461
119. 5.263 .337
111. ^. M* t'^O
103. 5.569 .353
105. 5.432 .374
102. ... . 5.513 taiaua
108. 5.369 *«**
106. 5.364 *««««
IIS. «.J** «««>f|f
115. 5.116 **
120. 5.273 »««»
119* . b.£3b . ..567
118. 5.142 .614
118. 5.271 .664
HI. *.*io r«i^«
117. 5.204 .369
104. 5.424 .260
-.11)4...- i»551 .197
104. 5.494 .285
106. 5.601 .304
10t- S-OP7 .2«S
106. 5.255 .249
106. 5.375 .302
l(Lfc. SJfif .*LQ8
24. 24. la.
100. 100. 7ST
102. 5.116 .197
120. 5.601 .664
HO. ^,340 ,373
6. .138 .140
6. 2.586 37.6*1
EFICIENCY USING
? «>3.yi5X
UUT
i
NOTE: CMEANI is DEFINED AS:
X
THE MtAN FQN X OAT5 USING Y-MUUH
tFK
91.1
93.6
oo_n
93.7
93.1
aaattu
»»U8»
«««»»
MMIftf/f
UttHtt*
tenon
tt9,2
86. 1
87.4
AQ.fl
92.9
95.1
96.4
94.8
94.6
9fl.T
«»S.3
94.4
96.1
10.
J^. - - - -
87.395
96.446
92.982
2.771
2.980
AVL"A&t 5
:
a
3
4
a
7
10
12
11
14
II
1*
17
I*
IB
20
21
22
2}
24
23
26
27
28
t*
JO
31
12
11
14
ia
v>
17
it
M
4O
41
42
41
44
4S
te
47
40
49
SO
ai
52
ai
84
35
3fl
37
38
30
8O
61
82
61
r.4
r.
e
7
a
0
0
71
3
4
3
>
-------
DAILY SUMMARY OF RESULTS
LOCATION: RICKENBACKEK AFB I9ao
DATES 1-26-80
TIME LOAD E E
IN OUT
0 1U6. b.189 .260
100 100. 5.274 .2Tb
200 103. S.J12 T«no
* 300 100. 5.376 .366
400 104. 5.420 .382
500 . 1M....! 7 00. »U«._-.4..993.... .. 9fc.
MINIMUM too. 4.901 .iss
MAXIMUM 120. 5.584 .tt,>9
MEAN .IQft,. i.£9J. . .Hlo.
STD.DEV. 9. .227 .213
X STD.DEV. 4. 4.296 Si. 102
24-HOUR REMOVAL EFICIENCY USING
1
! tMEANJ E. . E : 92^i??x
1 IN OUT
1 '
NOTEI tMEANJ IS DEFINED AS:
X
... . THE MEA.M FOR. A DSY3 USING Y-HOUH
fcFF
95.0
14.8
S4.^
*3.2
93.0
92T0
91.7
92.9
«!,»
««00»
«7.2
05.1
84.7
B5.7
it A. a
90.7
91.1
95.5
95.9
95.7
9fcT(i
96.8
95.6
91^9
23.
9hT
84.671
9b.769
92.254
3.752
4.067
AVtHAGtS
,N
2
J
4
S
.
7
a
10
1 1
12
1>
14
IB
I*
IT
!
1.
20
21
22
21
24
23
It
27
2.
a
JO
31
32
33
34
30
1<
37
M
30
40
41
42
43
44
49
4.
47
40
4.
9O
91
02
83
84
as
ae
B7
98
9B
eo
et
«2
83
64
es*
68
87
88
>
7O
71
72
73
74
79
V
-------
DAILY SUMMARY OF MESULTS
LOCATION: RICKENBACKEK AFB i960
DATE: i-29-eo
3
TIME
9
6
7 0
too
10 300
" 400
12 5.U1L
600
TOO
' 900
17 1000
" 1»UQ
" 1200
20 1300
21 1400
" 1500
" 1600
" > 1700
" L 1800
" vO l»00
" aaaa
** 2100
" 2200
10 2.10JL...
31
32 0 AVERAGES
33 i nr n*T*
34 MINIMUM
33 MAXIMUM
38 MEAN
37 9TD.DEV.
38 I STD.DEV.
3B
40 24-HOUR REMUV<
1
"! IMEANJ t ,
1 IN
«4
" Y_
" NOTE: CMEANI
X
40 THE ME/U
-J
LOAD E E
IN OUT
105. 5.115 .365
105. 5.229 .390
105. 5.261 .344
1U5. 5.066 .400
105. 5_.L9U .335
105. 5.196 .341
105. 5.080 .400
117. 000000 000000
114. 5.25V .571
112.. 'J.Oli .529
112. 5.430 .416
103. 5.261 .434
09 T M***M* MMMMMM
107. 0*0000 000000
116. 5.150 .500
UP.. JB₯*f* . 0»SB«fl
112. 000000 000000
112. 000000 000000
115. 000000 »***0*
115. 0*0000 0*000*
115. 000f00 *4»**«
24. 14. 14.
IDA. «4. >«.
99. 4.613 .335
117. 5.430 .576
5. 000000 000000
5. 000000 00000C
kL EFICIENCV UblNG
E ! VQoX
OUT
IS DEFINED AS:
« pOK X DAYS USING T-MUUK
EFF
92.9
92.6
93.0
92!l
93.6
93.4
92.1
"a"!*
92.3
91.6
mmmmm '
90.1
00000
00000
00000
00000
14.
6V. 002
93.552
000000
000000
000000
AVLKAlitS
i
2
3
4
t
0
7
10
1 1
12
13
14
10
17
10
10
20
21
22
23
24
29
20
27
20
30
32
33
4
39
37
30
4O
41
42
43
44
4B
40
47
40
40
90
91
12
83
84
99
88
97
98
80
BO
01
82
83
A4
bS
BB
87
BB
O9
7O
71
72
73
4
9
-------
DAILY SUMMARY OF RESULTS
LOCATION! RICKENBACKEK
DATE! 1-30-80
TIME
0
100
200
300
400
5J)0
600
700
aao
900
1000
1190
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
> 1700
2000
2100
2200
2300
* AVEHASES
X OF DAfA
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
_ MEAN .
STD.DEV.
X 8TO.OEV.
LOAD E
IN
112. *«
112. »»MMMM
112, MMMMHf
112. HMMMMM
112. HMMMMM
112. MMMMMM
112. MMMMMM
120. MMMMMM
122. »«»
118. 4.583
121. 4.923
116. 4.97t>
117. 5.164
100. 5.217
_..1»3*.._ 5.112. -
103. »»*»**
103. 5.060
101. S-S81
103. 5.421
103. 5.491
2«. 13.
100. *4.
100. 4.446
122. 5.581
...Ills. »»«»»*
7. *«*«»
AFB 1900
E
OUT
EFF
*«*«« «MMMM
**« MBMMM
9HHm\Mm\ MUMMM
HMMMMM
istaaa
*»MMMM
**«*
HMMMMM
MMMMMM
.182
.410
.511
.422
.625
***«*
.563
.514
.514
MMMMM
MMfMM
Hunan
MttOMM
MMMMM
*gMMM
96.0
94.6
91.7
69.7
O2.O
91.8
88.0
U5.6
**«
88.9
90.9
90.5
90.6
90.6
13. M.
5*T 54. " '
.182
.7)8
**««
»«*
24-HOUR REMOVAL EFICIENCY USIN6
1
CMEANJ E. ,_ E : jOOoX
1 IN OUT
NOTE! IMEAN)
X
THE ME AN
IS DEFINED AS:
FOR X UAYS UblNG T-HUIIK
85.572
96.022
»»* .. . .,
AVtRAGtS .
IT
IS
18
20
21
21
23
24
29
27
28
ts
3d
31
32
33
38
38.
17
38
M
4O
41
42
3
4
9
7
8
9
30
91
83
84
99
98
97
98
98
6O
ei
82
A3
.4
65
0
C
e
e
7
71
72
73
74
79
V
-------
DAILY SUMMARY OF KEbULTS
LOCATION: RICKENBACKEK AFb i960
DATE: 1-31-80
TIME
0
too
POO
300
400
5.U0
600
700
900
1000
1200
1300
1500
1600
Jf 1 7 QO
' |000
H 1900
2000
2100
2200
£300 _
* AVERAGES
X Of DATA
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
. .. ME AM _
STD.DEV.
X STD.DEV.
24-HOUR REMOVAL
1
. . IHEANl E i E
1 IN
v
LOAD E f.
IN
104. 4.963
1°*. S.l1^
104. 5.441
104. 5.255
117* 5.062
117. 5.052
f 31 . «, AT^t
125. 5.133 1
118. 4.927
119. 5.184
119. 5.027
OUT
.475
.53b
582
.492
.394
.386
.502
.438
.132
1391
.493
. -<»n
121. 5.431 .572
108. **** «»«*«
106. 5.553 .985
110. 5.445 .529
IO*JT *T2*fc -U«Q
110. 5.429
115. 5.322
Jl§._ ._5_,jJ4?
24. 22. 22
100,. 92, 92
104. 4.076
125. 5.b53 1
113. b.iMl
7. .185
6. 3.544 S3
EFICIENCT USING
OUT
l
NOTE: (MEAN] IS DEFINED AS:
X
THE. MEAN FOR A DATS USING
.142
.370
.132
*546
.184
,S9«
Y-HUUh
tFF
91.0
89.2
91.0
92.5
92.4
88.5
91.3
90 0
77.9
8H.8
91.3
92.5
90.2
89.5
*0*0«
00000
82.3
90.3
«n.»,
91.9
89.7
07.1
22.
92.
77.940
92.982
89.510
3.459
3.864
AVERAGES
i
IO
II
12^
1J
14
IS
!
IT
ia
19
20
21
11
23
41
42
49
4C
47 -
-------
DAILY SUMMARY OF RESULTS
LOCATION! R1CKENBACKEH AFb I960
DATES 2- 1-80
TIME
0
too
200
300
400
500
600
700
00
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
> 1700
x KS
200O
2100
2200
* AVERAGES
X OF DATA
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
: MEAN.
STD.OEV.
S 9TD.DEV.
24-HOUR REMOVA
1
(MEANL E f
; i IN
V
NOTES (MEANJ
X
THE MtAN
1
LOAD E E
IN OUT
110. 5.278 .496
108. 5.225 .413
108. 4.939 .343
108. 4.985 .405
112. 5.442 .445
112. 5.469 .414
121. 5.fc42 ,.407
127. 5.815 .425
119. 6.012 .382
113. 5.365 .621
113. 5.746 «*«»»»
119. 5.667 .535
112. 5.402 »»»»*»
111. 5.477 .415
113. 5.441 .432
110, STS«S Ta19
111. 5.715 .487
109. 5.569 .530
109. 5.532 .540
24. 24. 22.
100. 100. 9PT
106. 4.735 .343
127. 6.208 .621
.113. i.45<> .452.
6. .332 .077
5. 6.066 17.069
L EFICIENCT USING
E ? 9.U7JLM
OUT
i
IS DEFINED AS:
FOR X. DATS USING Y-HUUH
EFF
90.6
92.1
92. iL
93.1
91.9
92.4
91.8
92.4
92.8
92.7
93.6
94.1
08.4
0*00*1
90.6
91.0
92.4
92.1
91.5
90.5
90.2
22.
80.427
94.051
91.67B
1.443
1.574
AVtfiAGtS . __ ...
2
3
4
7
IO
11
12
13
14
18
17
1*
19
2O
21
22
23
24
23
28
27
a
JO
31
32
33
34
38
37
30
30
4O
41
42
43
44
49
47
48
4»
30
91
92
83
84
98
88
57
88
88
8O
64
es
eft
07
08
70
71
72
73
74
73
V
-------
DAILT SUMMARY Of HESULTS
x
A
4
*
9
«
7
0
A
10
t 1
12
11
14
ia
16
17
Id
10
20
21
22
2»
2*
26
2ft
27
ia
2«
30
31
92
33
34
39
3ft
37
JO
39
40
41
42
43
44
49
46
"
4t)
40
9U
9 t
92
93
54
33
i!!
LOCATION: RICKENBACKEK
DATE: 2- 2-60
TIME
0
too
200
300
400
600
700
ADO
900
1000
11UQ
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
f 17QO
1
CO 1900
2000
2100
2200
AVERAGES
X OF DAIA
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
ME AM
STD.OEV.
X STO.DEV.
24-HOUR REMOVAL
1
(MEANJ E . E
1 IN
y
NOTES (MEAN) I
X
_ THE MiAi*
LOAD E
IN
106. 5.667
110. b.647
H«. ^,«1*
110. 6.176
110. 6.630
1H7._ -0*935
107. 5.665
107. 5.419
1)7, ^,}«|
117. 5.625
116. 5.635
116. *»»**
120. ******
1?*. «k.OO«
125. 4.909
113. 5.063
109. 4.996
111. 5.398
Ml. fcTl*«
Ml. 6.333
114. 5.677
24. 22.
107. 4.909
125. 6.935
113. s. no
5. .579
5. 10.153
AFB 19UO
E
OUT
.507
MfdtfHtH
******
Muaoea
tataaa
******
******
******
tuautia
sessae
******
.371
.301
_._.276
.355
.419
.433
.330
.ibfl
11.
6.
.276
.526
J«f«JLft_
******
******
EFF
91.1
*****
ItKfUfff
*****
00000
Maaaa
*****
*****
*****
00000
*****
*****
MQ ^
92.4
94.1
92.9
92.2
93.2
94.4
11.
"». - .--
69.469
94.446
00000
******
******
EFICIENCT U3IN6
: *****tu
OUT
i
S DEFINED AS:
FOR x. DAIS us IN
e r-Houh
AWfcRAGhS
2
3
4
B
7
IO
II
12
13
14
IB
1.
17
16
1.
?n
21
22
24
23
26
27
2fl
JO
31
32
33
39
IA
37
3*
3*
4O
41
42
43
44
43
4.
47
46
4>
BO
31
S2
83
84
oa
86
87
a*
89
60
61
62
63
64
63
66
67
68
6*
7O
71
72
73
74
78
-------
DAILY SUMMARY OF KESULTS
J
LOCATION: KICKENBACKEH AFb i9oo
DATEJ 2- 3-60
TIME
0
100
200
300
400
_..50Q
600
700
600
900
1000
11QQ _
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
> 1700
to 180°
^ 2000
2100
2200
2300
* AVERAGES
X OF DATA
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MEAN
STD.DEV.
X 8TO.OEV.
LOAD t t
IN OUT
kFF
113. »»««»« 00*000 no a an
110. ****** 0«*00e 00000
II2T MMMMMM ««n«
116. b.502 .653
.ll«« 5.255. »0**fl*
2. .146 »**0«0
2. 2.779 *«»««
93.3
9?. 5
92.5
17.
84.049
9<4.061
000*00
0*»**0
24-HOUR REMOVAL EFICIENCY USING
1
(M.EAN1 E . E I 000««»l
1 IN
NOTE: tMEANJ
x
. THE MEAN
OUT
l
IS DEFINED AS:
FUH ₯ y»YS USING Y-HUUK
AVERAGES
A
20
21
22
23
24
29
28
27
28
JO
32
34
38
37
38
39
40
4t
42
43
44
49
46
47
48
49
9O
91
17
93
94
99
96
97
98
80
60
61
62
63
A4
63
86
67
66
69
70
71
72
73
74
79
-------
X
2
3
4
9
7
to
1 1
12
13
IS
I*
17
If
19
21
22
2)
24
U
76
11
30
31
32
33
34
39
37
30
3»
40
41
42
43
44
43
46
47
40
49
5O
91
92
33
34
33
96
\97
DAILY SUMMAHY OF HESULTS
LOCATIONS RICKENBACKEK AFb 1900
DATES 2- 4-80
TIME LOAD E E
IN OUT
0 104. 5.583 .500
100 103. 5.465 .484
2AA |0O 5.490 ' «$M
300 109. 5.351 .617
400 113. 5.357 .624
500 110. 5.291 .fcOu
600 111. 5.306 .586
700 115. 5.316 .642
an \9*t 5.919 .721
900 123. 5.323 .014
1000 130. 5.126 .766
_111)0_ lll._ b.231 .042
1200 123. 5.529 .693
1300 124. 5.520 1.166
1500 118. »»«** **»««
1600 114. »«»««* «*»«
> 1700 U.6.* S.H70 .52M.
' 1800 116. 5.538 .414
\^ 1900 114. 5.505 .360
2000 113, 5-.5H .flSfl
2100 114. 5.535 .473
2200 116. 5.574 .35?
* AVERAGES 24. 22. 22.
X OF DATA 100. «2T 92,
MINIMUM 103. 5.126 .357
MAXIMUM 131. 5.574 1.166
MEAN U6t 5,422 Bb05
STD.DEV. 7. .124 .190
X 8TO.DEV. 6. 2.290 31.17*
24-HOUR REMOVAL EFICIENCY USING
1
(MEAN) E E : 88.839X
1 IN OUT
V 1
NOTES (MEAN) IS DEFINED AS:
X
THE MEAN IQR JL-D.AY3 ysifjfi Y-HUUN
EFF
91.0
91.1
08.5
88.4
89.0
87.9
84.7
05.0
03.9
67.5
78.9
67 .2
»*«0«
90.4
92.5
93.5
91.5
93.6
93.0
22.
70.884
93.591
88.003
3.586
4.038
AYEKAttS
f\
4
7
10
11
12
13
14
IB
1ft
IT
1ft
19
20
21
22
23
24
29
26
27
26
3O
31
32
34
39
37
39
4O
41
42
43
44
49
46
47
4ft
0
O
1
2
3
4
9
6
7
6
9
60
61
62
63
U
63
66
67
66
69
7O
71
72
73
74
79
-------
DAILY
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
LOCATION: RICKENBACKEK AFB I9uo
DATE: 2* 5-so
TIME
0
too
200
300
400
, . . 500
600
700
00
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
! 1400
1500
1600
> 1700
N) I8°°
°^ 2000
2100
2200
2300
« AVERAGES
X OF DATA
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MEAN
3TD.OEV.
X 8TD.OEV.
24-HOUR REMOV
1
. (MEAN] £ ,
1 IN
y
NOTE: (MEANI
X
THE MfcA
LOAD E E EFF
IN OUT
107. 5.633 .627 88.9
107. 5.547 .659 88.1
107. 5.19.Q . .690 67. a
113. b.472 .574 89.5
113. 5.549 ,b50 90.5
... .-l.l.l. __. -5...4..11 .il.5 90.0
113. 5.401 .305 94.3
107. 5.411 .292 94.6
10ft. S.160 T1PA 91.9
94. 5.503 .224 95.9
97. 5.299 .386 92.7
1|5_A 5.194 .434.. 91.6
107. 4.513 .327 92. B
107. 4.821 .351 92.7
105. 5.120 .SOS 94,0
108. 5.090 .270 94.7
118. 4.910 .321 93.5
...Jl«* 5.1151 .265 9«.7
114. «»**« *«»» **»»
112. 5.915 .540 90.7
110. 5.767 T«92 91,5
114. 5.87b .591 89.9
115. 5.251 na»»ntt »»/»
. . . I.16_«_ .. 6_,45J *»*»»# IfBIHUL
24. 23. 21. 21.
too. «b. a«. MS. ....
94. 4.513 .224 87.430
118. 6.057 .690 95.931
110. 5.375 .432 92.000
6. .364 .147 2.435
5. 6.768 34.0*1 2.647
AL EFICIENCV USING
E : 91.9711
OUT
1
IS OEFINEU AS:
N FOR X DAYS USING Y-HUUK AVtKAGtS .
r<
20
21
22
23
24
29
26
27
a
30
31
32
33
34
39
36
37
38
4O
41
42
43
44
47
48
4»
90
91
83
84
89
96
S7
98
60
61
62
63
66
07
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
79
V
-------
DAILY SUMMARY OF RESULTS
LOCATION: RICKENBACKEH AFB i960
OATt: 2- 6-eo
TIME
0
too
2OO
300
4UO
5(10
600
700
AOO
900
1000
.HOP ._...
1200
1300
1400
1500
tbOO
> 1790
N> 1»0°
vj 1900
2000
2100
2200
2300
AVERAGES
Z OF DATA
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MEAH
STO.OEV.
* STO.OEV.
24-HOUR REMUVA
1
IMEANJ E ,
, 1 IN
f
NOTEi (MEANJ
X
THE MEAN
'i ...
LOAD E E tFF
IN OUT
99. 00*0*« 000*00 00000
99. *« *0000* »«00«
99. 000*00 000000 00000
99. 00*0*0 000000 00000
99. 0000*0 000000 aaaaa
99. 00*000 «00000 00000
99. »0*00'0 00000* 0*000
114. 00*0*0 000000 0*000
116. b.«6b 00000* 00000
116. b.390 V89000 0000*
114. 5.442 1.014 01.4
112. S.47S .942 02.8
115. Srfcfcl ,9)M M1.A
114. 5.692 .735 87.1
104. 5.791 ,7<»3 87.2
97. 5.639 .665 88.2
97. 0***** **00«* 0000*
97. 5.903 000000 0*0*0
QA. «irfck^ MKMK1KI MfMffU
98. 5.512 «0000* 0000*
96. 5.716 0000*0 000*0
90. 5.619 Hmttm Henna
24. 13. 6. 6.
100T 5«T ?». PS.
97. 5.390 .665 81.376
120. 5.903 1.010 88.199
104. 0*«**0 000000 M0000B
a. »*«** 0*0000 000000
A. **** »»« 00000*
L EFICIENCY USING
E : fOOvY
OUT
i
IS DEFINED AS:
FOR X DAYS USJHG Y-HUUK AVtWAGtS ... ._ ..
:i
4
a
7
9
to
11
l>
13
14
It
!
17
It
10
70
21
22
23
24
23
26
27
28
X»
SO
51
32
33
34
39
in
37
3>
30
40
41
42
43
44
48
4fl
47
48
4B
3O
81
12
83
54
33
sa
t7
36
00
60
61
62
A3
A4
f.t>
t.6
C7
«n
fttf
7O
71
72
7J
74
79
7V
-------
DAILY SUMMAHY OF RESULTS
LOCATION: RICKENBACKEH AFH i960
DATEI 2- 7-80
TIME
0
100
200
300
400
5QQ ....
600
700
800
900
1000
MOO
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
> 1700
N) l8**
°° 2000
2100
2200
2300
AVERAGES
X OF DATA
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
_ MEAfl .
STO.OEV.
X STO.DEV.
24-HOUR REMOVAL
1
l"EA_Nl t , f
1 IN
t
LOAD E
IN
112. 5.712
112. 5.866
112. 5. 151
112. 5.726
112. 5.783
.112. b.Oflti
112. ******
112. 5.754
M«, 5,74P
119. 5.786
116. 5.751
107. 5.726
107. 5.520
110, 5,269
112. 5.403
108. 5.480
1.0.8,.... ...9. .97 3
US. 5.143
118. 5.364
118. S.2SO
118. 5.033
116. 5.21U
24. 23.
100T 96.
107. 4.973
119. 5.666
.113. .i.511
4. .280
4. 5.066
E
OUT
«**«»
MM**
**«
»»»
»«««**
. .***»*»
****
****»
«**««*
000*0
******
MM*
MmMMum
00000
**»**
******
*«*0*«
******
««
******
*«««»
0.
>.
**«
.000
-.JJItftft
EFICIENCV USING
UU1
i
NOTE: (MEANJ IS DEFINED AS:
X
THE MtAN FOH X DATS USING Y-HOUK
EFF
000**
«0*0*
****.
00***
***»«
*****
*****
»**«*
»«**»
0*0*
*****
*
*««««
00000
»»»*
«*»»»
***«
J[***JT .... _. ...
*****
*****
SflJftl
0.
*«
.000
*«*«
*»»»**
,
AVt^AGtS ..
;v
2
3
4
9
7
9
IO
II
12
13
14
IB
17
ia
19
2O
21
22
23
24
29
26
27
3O
31
32
*4
39
37
39
39
40
41
42
43
44
49
46
47
49
49
9O
91
92
93
94
99
96
57
98
99
AO
61
62
65
06
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
79
-------
DAILY SUMMARY OF RESULTS
/r
2
3
4
9
7
9
1O
I I
12
Ts
14
16
17
::
20
22
23
23
2ft
24
29
3O
31
32
33
34
J*
37
JB
39
4O
41
42
43
44
43
46
47
49
3u
31
32
33
.14
at
3«
LOCATION: RICKENBACKEH AFB i9oo
OATEI 2- 8-80
TIME
0
too
PQO
300
400
5UO
600
TOO
AHA
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1500
1600
> 1700.
to iao°
2100
2200
AVERAGES
Z OF DATA
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
3foVDEV.~
* 9TO.DEV.
LOAD E t
IN OUT
105. 5.190 ***000
10S. 5.1J7 000000
112. 5.276 000C00
112. 5.280 »00000
112. 5.3.1U ttaaau
112. 5.329 000000
112. 5.435 000000
114. 5.140 000000
112. b.22<» 000000
112. . b.213 taaaaa
112. 5.384 .376
111. «** **»*0*
111. 5.296 .401
105. 5.187 .314
- 101*.. . 5..27'» . .312
108. 5.089 .309
108. 5.037 .302
IO2. S.flAfe ,2«*
103. 5.111 .280
98. 5.171 .295
JJ19.. 5,12? ,£fl.J
24. 23. 11.
100,. 98,. All.
EFF
0000
0000
00000
00000
00000
00000
000
00000
00000
taaat
93.0
****
91 .8
92.4
93.9
94.1
93.9
94.0
94.5
94.3
94.5
11.
98. 5.037 .280 91.820
121. 5.514 .427 94.512
109. 5*240 0*0*00 000000
5. .125 «*
S. 2.IS2 »
24-HOUR REMOVAL EFICIENCV USING
1
-LM.EANJ £ , E . 1. f «J0f 81
1 IN OUT
t '
NOTE: IMEANJ
X
. THE MEAN
IS DEFINED ASt
f.OK.X..DAT3 USING T-MUUK
000000
000000
AVERAGES
A
2
4
7
10
II
19
13
14
II
1*
17
ia
10
20
21
22
23
24
29
27
2a
10
31
32
33
33
36
37
M
30
4O
41
42
43
44
49
46
47
46
49
9O
91
83
34
93
86
87
31
80
6O
61
62
63
6~9
66
67
68
69
7O
71
72
73
74
78
V
-------
DAILY SUMMARY
OF RESULTS
-i
LOCATIONS RICKENBACKER AFB i9»o
OATEl 2- 9-80
TIME
0
100
PDA
300
400
600
700
800
900
1000
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
> ..170.0
1 1800
£ 1900
2000
2100
2200
2300
« AVERAGES
X OF DATA
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MEAN
3TO.OEV.
X 3TD.DEV.
24-HOUR REMOVAL
1
IMEANJ.. E , E
: i IN
, ..... .. Y
LOAD
115.
113.
115.
U4t~
11.
11-
16.
16.
18.
18.
19.
19.
104.
_.!9S....
103.
102.
IDS,.
105.
105.
105.
24.
100.
102.
119.
6.
5.
EFICI
OUT
i
E E
IN
5.082
5.215
5.283
5.342
5.393
5.374
S-39H
5.503
5.259
5.456
5.563
5.031
5.701
.5.641
5.556
5.530
S.fcfli
5.653
5,703
24. 24
100, 100
5.082
5.031
.190
3.462 10
ENCY USING
93..J82.I
OUT
.387
.389
.333
.379
I358
.317
.365
.311
!357
.387
.319
.281
!326
.350
.325
.324
.260
.389
.141
.035
.141
EFF
92.4
92.5
93.7
92.9
92,8
93.4
94.1
93.4
94.1
93.5
93.0
94.5
95.1
95.2
94.1
93.7
94-7
94.2
94.3
93.6
24.
10U.
9.J.387
95.245
"3.767
.735
.784
i NOTE: (MEAN! IS DEFINED AS:
X
THE MfcAN FOH x DAYS USlHG »-HOUK AVtHAGtS
i
1 _ _. .
,\
2
3
4
7
1O
1 1
12
14
1.
1.
17
1.
1.
2O
21
22
23
24
29
28
27
t>
to
32
33
M
35
IA
37
3.
40
41
42
43
44
48
4.
47
4.
4.
90
81
92
93
84
99
98
97
98
8O
81
82
83
r,4
63
88
07
ea
80
70
71
72
74
79
-------
DART SUMMARY OF HESULTS
LOCATION: RICKENBACKEH
DATEI 2-10-80
TIME
0
too
2AO
300
400
_.. . ...500. _
600
700
AOO
900
1000
_.. It 00 .._
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
> )700
1 1800
M 2000
2100
2200
* AVERAGES
x or DAIA
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MEAN
3TD.OEV.
X STO.OEV.
24-HOUR REMOVE
1
: [MEANJ £ ,
1 IN
t NOTE: (MEAN]
X
LOAD E
IN
no! bUoo
111. *,+**
112. b.623
112. b.b32
.117* b.4.9.b.. .
117. 5.415
115. 5.449
107. b.b27
104. b.b33
116. .. . b«.MB4. .
115. 5.619
113. 5.44b
114, S^SfcS
105. b.59b
107. b.ibl
108* b!?13
109. b.S4b
110. S,S«t.
110. 5.494
109. b.376
. ikfl.. i.SJltt
24. 24.
loo. joy.
104. b.376
121. b.713
4. .079
4. 1.434
AFb 1900
t
OUT
.387
.357
000000
000000
080000
00000
000000
.415
.259
.319
.301
.317
.250
.210
.275
.341
14.
.211
.<4lb
0*00110
EFF
93.2
93.6
95 1 "
00000
00000. ... - . . . . . -. ....
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
92.4
95.4
94.3
94.6
94.5
95.5
96.0
94.9
93.6
14.
58-
92.381
96.196
000000
000*00
000000
kL EFICIENCY USING
OUT
..1
IS DEFINED AS:
C no w 11 A V C llcfft
» i vn n v " v VV«M
~
--
A
2
3
4
7
1O
12
13
14
19
18
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
23
28
27
28
JO
31
32
33
34
39
36
37
38
4O
41
42
43
44
43
48
47
48
48
SO
91
83
34
33
98
37
38
88
80
8t
82
83
87
88
7O
71
72
73
74
73
-------
DAILY SUMMARY OF RESULTS
j
LOCATION! R1CKENBACKER AFtJ 19oO
DATE: 2-ii-ao
TIME LOAD E t
IN OUT
0 116. 5.480 .417
100 114. 5.463 .362
200 ||3» «>T557 . *(«>
300 114. 5.450 .337
400 116. 5.510 .439
_ 5y.O 121 ._ 5.43S . .H85.
600 119. 5.506 .479
700 110. 5.S39 .398
ADO >21T ST«TD . *OS
900 119. 5.457 .3B2
1000 116. 5.532 .355
..... .11Q.O._ UP. *._437 .«i<|
1 1200 120. 5.152 .447
i 1300 120. 5.278 .446
1400 122. 5-205 Ti*l
1500 120. 5.271 .412
1600 105. 5.186 .414
. . > 17QO _ 104. 5..56Q .459
1 1800 101. 5.226 .541
" 1900 99. 5.353 .530
2000 102. 5.393 .525
2100 103. 5.390 .529
2200 103. 5.37b .553
1'OQ- 10g._ .i*18j, .5.23
» AVERAGES 24. 24. 24.
rX OF DATA 100. 100. 10O, \
MINIMUM 99. 5.152 .315
MAXIMUM 122. 5.557 .553
L_ MEAN 11?. .. .Su389 .4.J9.
STD.DEV. 8. .120 .069
X STD.OEV. 7. 2,224 15.693
24-MOUR REMOVAL EFICIENCY USING
1
. (MEAN] t , £ : 91. 0.46.X.
1 IN OUT
v i .. . .
NOTE! IMEAN] IS DEFINED AS:
X
THE MEAN pOR x P.AYS USING Y-HUUR
EFF
92. a
93.4
94TJ
93.8
92.0
91.1
91.3
92.8
9P,M
93.0
93.6
92.4
91.3
91.5
«2Tfc
92.2
92.0
91.4
89.6
90.1
.90-1
90.2
09.7
VQ,. 1
oo_I '.:.
89.647
94.328
91.B3b
1.349
1.469
,x
18
21
23
24
29
2<
27
28
JO
31
32
33
34
30
30
37
38
4O
41
42
43
44
49
4.
47
48
49
9O
91
84
99
98
37
08
89
80
61
82
83
64
es
88
87
«8
70
71
72
73
74
79
'V
-------
Si"
4
a
7
to
1 1
13
14
It
!
IT
II
10
20
21
23
2*
26
24
29
3U
31
J3
34
33
30
37
ja
JO
40
4 1
*42
« J
Itt
'*7
«O
57
DAILY SUMMARY OF RESULTS
LOCATIONS NICKENBACKEH AFB i9o
DATES 2-12-80
TIME
0
100
300
400
500 . ......
600
700
Aon
900
1000
... . . ..110.0
1200
1300
t«oo
1500
1600
> 1700
U> >s<>0
U> 1900
2100
2200
* AVERAGES
t Of DATA
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MEAN
STO.OEV.
X 3TO.DEV.
LOAD E E
IN OUT
111. 5.173 .424
111. 5.134 .381
111. 5.267 .430
111. 5.262 .300
117^" sll22 I 205
117. 5.344 .221
123. 5.215 .196
123. 5.201 .220
.. l«l2.-_. S.lflU .J10
123. 5.222 .344
123. 5.182 .291
M*. 5.0'? .1*7
109. 5.056 .220
99. 4.962 .259
. 100. b.UBU .203
103. 5.106 .283
102. 5.106 .297
IO7. 3.]A| ,j<>4
108. 5.150 .266
108. 4.959 .342
2«. 24. 24.
100. too. IPO. i
99. 4.959 .187
123. 5.344 .430
112. 5.159 ,.280
7. .094 .073
7. 1.622 25.300
0
EFF
91.8
92.6
91.8
94.1
95.5
96.0
95.9
95 9
96.2
95.6
94.0
93.4
94.4
95.5
94.8
ib.O
94.5
94.2
44.1
94.8
93.1
93.9
24.
91.001
96.314
94.417
1.397
1.480
24-HOUR REMOVAL EFICIENCV USING
1
IMEANJ E , E ? 94.
-------
DAILY SUMMARY OF RESULTS
LOCATION: RICKENBACKEH AFB i9eo
OATEI 2-i3-eo
TIME LOAD E E
IN OUT
0 106. 5.004 .274
100 106. 5.195 .169
200 106, «,07« ,P1P
300 106. 5.027 .147
400 112. 5.096 000000
... . 550 112. i.e2o gggggg
600 112. 4.429 000000
700 112. 4.666 «*«**
00 11. S.uTa MmMuMm
900 18. 5.076 000000
1000 16. 5.198 .354
1200 14^ 5!335 !s67
i 1300 120. 5.317 .391
! 1400 118,. S^33« ,S1«
1500 110. 5.407 .302
1600 106. 5.166 .226
> .1700 [ _ IQ3. 5.l7u .22**
' 1»66 109. 5.355 .246
!£ 1900 112. *00000 ******
2000 US. S.521 T4IT8
2100 110. 5.469 .271
2200 111. 5.475 .269
2300 110. 5.556 .261
* AVERAGES 24. 23. 17.
X OF DAT* 100. 9fc. 7lT
MINIMUM 103. 3.tt2b .147
MAXIMUM 120. 5.556 .476
MEAN _ J1U 5. J 26. .*».«»...
STD.DEV. 4. .366 «»«*«*
X STD.DEV. 4. 7.925 »<«*«»
24-HOUR REMOVAL EFICIENCY USING
1
_. [MEAN!. I , E : «0«f»ffi
1 IN OUT
NOTE: (MEANl IS DEFINED AS:
X
THE MEAN f.QR X.D.A.YS y SING T-HUUH
EFF
94.5
96.4
97.1
000*
0000*
93.2
92.7
92.7
U7
94.4
95.7
95.6
95.4
95.0
94.7
95.3
17.
91.340
97.069
000000
-
20
21
22
23
24
23
28
27
28
a»
30
31
32
33
34
33
Ml
37
38
39
4O
41
42
43
44
4B
48
47
48
48
30
Bl
83
84
39
B8
37
88
SB
8O
81
82
83
A«
05
88
87
88
70
71
72
73
74
78
-------
I
2
3
4
9
7
a
a
to
1 1
12
13
14
ia
10
17
IB
19
2O
21
22
21
24
29
i6
27
2«
29
3O
31
32
13
34
33
36
37
38
39
4O
41
42
43
44
45
40
47
4U
40
5s»
91
92
53
34
55
9«
?'
DAILY SUMMARY OF RESULTS
LOCATION! R1CKENBACKER *Fb I960
DATE« 2-J4-80
TIME
0
100
9no
300
400
5UO
600
700
nn
900
1000
1100
1200
1500
1400
1SOO
1600
_ ..> 1?«0 .
' 1800
Ul 1*00
2000
2100
2200
2300
» AVERAGES
X OF DATA
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MEAN.
STO.DEV.
X STO.OEV.
24-HOUR REMOVA
1
LMEJkNl E ,.
1 IN
t
NOTEI (MEANJ
X
ThE ME.AN
LOAD E E
IN OUT
106. 5.M« .241
106. 5.S3J .194
tQfc 9 «« ISfr
106. b.444 .173
112. b.«4l«J .^>00
112^. 5..5«9 ,iJi
24. 24. 24.
100. 100. lOu,
97. 5.206 .097
118. 5.712 .624
-LOJ>^ _5..«»JS .£19
4. .114 .110
4. 2.103 50. 206
L EFICIENCV USING
E « 95tS6«
OUT
l
IS DEFINED AS:
E.Qk_x e*TS USING T-Hyi
EFF
95.6
96.5
97 i
96. a
96.3
S5.5
96.3
97.5
9fr 7
97.0
96.1
95.7
96.8
96.0
Q*.t
95.9
97.2
97.9
97.8
98.2
OS.O
68.6
92.4
95.1
24.
J.OO. ' '
80.612
9
-------
DAILY
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
LOCATION: RICKENBACKER AFB 1950
DATES 2-15-80
TIME
0
too
200
1 300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
)100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
> 1700 ...
1 1800
190°
w 2000
2100
2200
2300
* AVERAGES
I OF DATA
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
ME AJI . ._
STD.DEV.
X 8TO.OEV.
24-HOUR REMOV
1
(MEANJ £ ,
1 IN
If
NOTES (MEAN]
X
1 THE MtA
LOAD t t tFF
IN OUT
103. 5.446 .176 96.8
103. 5.496 .105 98.1
103. S.S42 M«»»« #**.*
103. 5.377 *0*000 0*0«0
103. 5.407 «0*0*0 0000*
103. 5.206 ,027 <*<».5
103. 5.278 .399 92.4
103. 5.657 .470 91.7
117. 5.427 T4T5 91.2
117. 5.59* .713 87.3
106. ****** »0*00* »0*0«
108. b.456 .6l«> 08.8
105. 5.720 .493 91.4
106. 5.855 .697 88.1
106. 5.874 .840 a5, 7
106. 5.976 .467 92.2
93. 6.016 .338 94.4
100. 5.848 »»0000 0000*
99. 5.809 *0»**» *****
97. 6.020 »*»*» **0«*
99. 5.874 **«*« «*««
101. 5.831 ***« **«00
100. 5.937 ****** *»**«
96. 5.946 ****0* 00*0*
24. 23. 13. 13.
100. 96,. 54, S4.
93. 5.206 .027 85.701
117. 6.020 .840 99.474
193. 5.678 «.«*** 00*0**
5. .253 «*»»«* »00»**
5. 4,463 «««« «»*»«*
AL EFICIENCV USING
OUT
i
IS DEFINEU AS:
N FP* x UAYS USING Y-HUUK AVL^AGts
,v
20
21
22
21
24
23
26
27
2B
JO
11
12
11
14
16
36
17
la
se
40
41
42
41
44
49
46
47
48
4»
3O
91
92
93
S4
99
96
37
38
00
6O
61
62
63
bS
66
66
69
70
71
72
73
74
79
'V
-------
DAILY SUMMARY OF RESULTS
LOCATION! RICKENBACKEH AFB 1900
DATES 2-16-80
TIME
o
100
2AA
300
400
50Q_ ...
600
700
ADO
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1SOO
1600
> .17U.OL
1 1800
13 1900
2000
2100
2200
2300
0 AVERAGES
x or a A i A
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MEAN. .
STD.DEV.
X STD.OEV.
24-HOUR REMOVAL
1
[MEAN] £ > E
1 IN
:
L - T
LOAD
99.
99.
««.
99.
99.
99!
99.
1 1 a.
114.
110.
110.
121.
121.
1 19.
117.
97.
96.
101.
105.
108.
108.
24.
_iuiu
96.
121.
8.
8.
E
IN
5. 56V
5.857
«.««4
5.880
5.073
5^651
5.706
s,*.Ta
5. 643
5.64<>
. 5.72B
5.643
5.715
*>,h»7
5.575
5.651
.... 5.72V
5.491
5.547
s.alo
5.681
5.470
24.
_lfttt.
4.974
5.894
.196 ~
3.469
E
OUT
000000
000000
000000
000*00
000000
000000
090000
000000
000000
.729
.005
.750
.718
.591
.460
.470
.579
9.
.416
.005
000000
000000
EFF
00000
000*0
00000
00000
00000
000**
0B0B0
00000
00000
06.9
85.8
06.9
89.3
91.8
91.4
ttfl.4
9.
-38.
85.756
0SSSS9
000000
000000
EFICIENCV USING
*s*9*»X
OUT
l
I NOTES (MEAN] IS UEF
X
T«E MEAN FQH x
INEU AS:
DAYS usjr
-------
DAILY SUMMARY OK RESULTS
LOCATION! RICKENBACKEH AFB i960
DATE! 2-17-80
TIME LOAD t E
IN OUT
0 116. 5.701 ,7a7
100 129. 5.648 .614
POO |P2. S.fcAl TS«h
300 121. 5.706 .513
400 121. 5.660 .516
_ . 500 118. . i.531 ..IBb
600 116. 5.657 .531
700 114. 5.675 .408
ADO 11«. Srfcl7 -aSS
400 114. 5.610 .514
1000 116. 5.591 .430
MOO . 11«.. .5.601 .. .451
1200 115. 5.776 .41S
1300 109. 5.892 .298
1400 IIOT Sr77fc rflflP
1500 122. 5.181 .449
1600 99. 5.391 .268
> 1700.. _ 1 01 ....... 5. 7 15 .. ....2B9, .
U, 1«00 103. 5.654 .341
00 1900 103. 5.755 .382
2000 106- 5-fcSO -59^
2100 106. 5.802 .383
2200 107. 5.733 .420
2300 107. 5.693 M««*0
« AVERA6ES 24. 24. 23.
X OF DATA 100. 100. «fc.
MINIMUM 99. 5.181 .268
MAXIMUM 129. 5.892 .747
_ . -MEAN 113.. .V.65J _ ..^4J|«f
3TO.DEV. 6. .141 .110
I 8TO.DEV. 7. 2.4J7 24,*««
24-HOUR REMOVAL EFICIENCY USIN6
1
.. CMEANJ E , F I.92.U56X
1 IN OUT
NOTE! (MEAN] IS DEFINED AS:
X
THE MEAN F0« X UAYS USING *-HUU«
_
EFF
86.9
09.1
89.7
91.0
90.9
91.2
90.6
92.8
9J^9
90.8
92.3
91.9
92.8
94.9
92 ,i
91.3
95.0
94.9
94.0
93.4
93,0
93.4
92.7
«0ft«ff
23.
96^ " "
86.891
95.026
92.048
1.948
2.116
AVtMGtS _...
i ^
20
21
22
23
24
23
20
27
26
X*
10
31
32
33
M
38
30
37
38
3*
4O
41
42
43
44
49
4«
47
48
O
1
2
3
84
93
96
S7
98
9>
flO
81
82
63
P. 4
A3
ea
67
88
8B
7O
71
72
73
74
79
V
-------
DAILY SUMMARY OF RESULTS
J
* LOCATION: RICKENBACKEM AFb I9»o
2 OATEI 2-18-80
TIME LOAD f. E
° IN OUT
7 0 115. 5.683 »***tt*
too 126. s.m «»«*«
* *nn 12* f,*-*f 507
10 300 123. 5.767 .480
" aOO 121. 5.693 .453
11 50ft 121. 5«63b. .«0 .315
! ..1100... 119«_. b.<»3b ..JOB
1200 120. 5.486 .280
1300 US. 5.458 .275
|400 tit. S,"| ,"«»
" 1500 117. 5.551 .231
" 1600 100. 5.551 .180
" > 1700 _ IU1.. 5,537.. .16B
" ^ 1800 100. 5.732 .159
" vD t900 78. 6.112 .172
27 2000 «TT S.fcOT ,\1*
" 2100 100. 5.591 .152
" 2200 100. 5.512 .124
10 ... 2300 10.0.. 5»«ft_ .151
31
" * AVERAGES 24. 24. 22.
" X OF DATA 100. 100. «4.
" MINIMUM 78. 5.435 .124
" MAXIMUM 126. b.112 .507
MEAN 112. 5,j>2« ,i9b
37 3TD.DEV. 12. .148 .124
" X 3TD.OEV. 11. 2.627 41.954
jw
" 24-HOUR REMOVAL EFICIENCT USING
i
IMEAN] E , E ? 94.75iX
1 IN OUT
44
* Y . .'.... _ . _...
'* NOTE: (MEAN) IS DEFINED AS:
"! x
40 THE MfcAN FOH X 1>AYS USING Y-HUUK
1»
>«
tl .
tFF
*»««*
*»»»»
91 0
91.5
92.0
12.8
92.4
92.6
95,0
93.7
94.3
<*4.3. .
94.7
95.0
Q^.A
95.8
96.7
97.0 _.
>7.2
97.2
«fc.
-------
DAILY SUMMAHY OF RESULTS
LOCATION: RICKENBACKEN AFB i960
OATEI 2-19-80
TIME LOAD t E
IN OUT
0 103. 5.529 .131
100 103. 5.514 .140
200 IO5. S.SQ* . | flS
300 103. 5.557 .162
400 103. 5.625 .<>0d
50.0 _ 1V3. 5^i9V . ..17M
600 103. 5.732 .180
700 103. 5.689 .146
00 104, S-fcflh Tla*
900 104. 5.694 .114
1000 109. 5.58.1700... 77, _ 5.496 .fell
1 1600 76. 5.507 .574
g 1900 72. 5.389 .432
2000 75. 5.492 .4*7
2100 78. 5.430 .500
2200 64. 4.900 .656
2300 85^ 5..481 ,6£i
« AVERAGES 24. 24. 24.
X QF DATA 100. 10U. 100. 1
MINIMUM 72. 4.900 .112
MAXIMUM 109. 5.966 .656
r HIAI* -.93a.. _.S,56i - ..2.95.
9TO.OEV. 12. .190 .196
X STO.OEV. 13. 3.408 66.415
24-HOUR REMOVAL EFICIENCY USING
1
JMEANJ E i 6 « 94J05?
1 IN OUT
NOTE> (MEAN! IS DEFINED A3:
X
Die. MEAN PCJR .JL.U.AYS USIMG T-HUUK
- --
tFF
97.6
97.3
97.4
97.1
96.4
96.7
97.4
97.4
98.0
97.1
95.9
97.0
97.3
97.9
96.0
90.1
08.7
69.6
92.0
91 ^1_
90.6
06.6
06.6
24.
86.615
90.034
94.t>23
3.732
3.944
i
20
21
22
23
24
29
26
27
ia
ta
JO
31
32
33
34
33
36
37
36
39
4O
41
2
3
4
8
6
7
a
46
9O
91
32
83
4
89
86
37
aa
8B
60
61
62
63
A4
63
66
67
66
6»
70
71
72
73
74
78
-------
,
)
4
a
"7
a
g
IO
1 1
12
14
15
10
17
,.
*
'
21
22
23
2*
29
27
28
2b
JO
J1
32
33
34
3ft
30
37
36
J»
4O
41
42
43
«4
4«
47
4ft
,0
91
92
94
9S
5ft
97
DAILY SUMMAKY OF NESULTS
LOCATION: RICKENBACKEH AFB 1900
OATEI 2-20-80
TIME
0
100
300
400
500 .....
bOO
700
MAO
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
IflOO
1500
IbOO
> 1700
1 1800
£ 1900
M 2000
2100
2200
£300
« AVERAGES
I OF DATA
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MEAN. .
STD.OEV.
X 9TO.OEV.
LOAD t E
IN OUT
87. b.37b .646
87. 5.276 .588
87. b.b89 .449
87. b.b50 .41b
92.. b.i27 .445
92. 5.584 .468
92. 5.b2U .439
Q1. >.*!! ."51
100. 5.679 .451
103. 5.b83 .378
lab. b.fllb . . J2B
103. *«»* .327
101. *«*«« .521
104. *»*» .626
108. **»» .547
..1U3L .889888 . .194
97. »H»»»» .184
97. «* .22b
100. ****** .23b
98. » .547
-------
DAILY SUMMAKV OF KESULTS
LUCATIONI RICKENBACKER
DATE: 2-21-80
TIME
0
100
200
300
400
.500
600
700
aoo
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
| 1400
1500
1600
> (700
I 1800
N) 1900
2000
2100
2200
2300
* AVEHA6E8
X OF DAT*
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MEAN
STD.OEV.
X STD.OEV.
LOAD E
IN
74. 000***
74. 000000
79. 000000
ao. 00000*
85. 000000
as. *»*«**«
««. 000000
97. 000000
107. 4.609
107... 5.183
106. 5.162
98. 4.976
93. 4.944
89. 000000
104. 5.307
!VP, 5.250
100. 5.250
100. 5.353
97. ST«fcP
100. 5.286
96. 5.230
._.£!. 5.250
24. 13.
100. 54.
23. 4.609
107. 5.353
(t9t 000000
18. 000000
20. M«*00
AFb 1980
t
OUT
.397
.496
.686
.587
.416
.419
00*0*
.669
.68U
.457
.247
.225.
.325
!2
-------
DAILY SUMMAHY OF KESULtS
LOCATION: RICKENBACKEH AFb i9ttu
OATEI 2-22-60
TIME
LOAD
IN
0
100
21.
66.
5.266
OUT
.326
,304
1 «no
EFF
93.6
94.2
an <
300
400
.SOD
600
700
lion
92.
92.
92.
92.
92.
5.364
5.4io
5.71*
5.467
5. 255
.307
.312
303
.121
.190
94.3
94.2
94.7
97.e
96.4
Qfc.ft
900
1000
..ILttft.
1200
1300
1400
97.
94.
9.4..
94.
97.
97 T
000000
000000
000000
.196
000000
00080*.
000000
***
96.4
00000
1500
1600
> 17QO..
00 1^00
93.
63.
..64a
B5.
66.
00000m
b.469
000000
.185
5.515
5.614
.195
.310
00000
00000
-JU00J
00000
96.6
96!s
94.3
2100 66. 000000 000000 00000
2200 69. 000000 000000 00000
.... 2.?00 89, ...00J»000... 0»00J0. 0000ft.
0 AVERAGES 24. 15. IS. 15.
_X OF DAT* 100. 63. 63. _63.
MINIMUM 21. 5.255 .121 93.014
MAXIMUM 97. 5.715 .384 97.776
3TD.DEV. 15. 000000 000000 000000
I 9TO.DEV. 17. 000000 000000 000000
24-HOUR REMOVAL EFICIENCY USIN6
1
JMEANJ I i E ._.:. .000?
1 IN OUT
JL !.._..., _. ..
NOTE! (MEANI IS DEFINED A3:
X
THE MEAN FOK X DATS USING Y-t
9
7
_ _
10
II
. <_2
II
14
!
!
39
37
38
4O
42
43
91
92
87
00
70
71
-------
DAILY SUMMARY OF RESULTS
LOCATION! R1CKEN8ACKEH AFb 1980
DATE: 2-23-so
TIME
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
> 1700
' 1800
£ 1900
2000
2100
2200
2300
* AVERAGES
X OF OA1A
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
... - "E*M .
STO.DEV.
X STD.DEV.
24-HOUR REMOVA
1
IMEANI E ,
1 IN
.. Y
NOTES IMEANJ
X
THE *fc*N
LOAD E E EFF
IN OUT
66. «000«0 000 «0000
66. »»»»*» 00*000 00000
fib, 0*0000 Mmmmmrn HIM MM
86. 000000 000000 00000
66. *0«000 *0*000 00000
86. 0*0«00 *0«ff00 00*00
86. 0*0000 000000 00000
86. »0*000 000000 00000
98. 000000 000000 00000
100. 000000 000000 00000
97. 000000 000000 00000
.97. 000000 000000 00000
97. »000»0 «00000 00000
100. *000»0 000000 00000
103. >0«000 000000 0000fl
96. b.360 .316 94.1
83. S.467 .281 94.9
*4. b,572 ,«72 9J.5
85. 5.646 .155 97.3
86. »0«0«0 «00«00 00000
87. 000000 000000 00000
68. 000000 000000 00000
67. 000000 000000 0000*
ft9. 00«0»0 »«0000 *«»ff*
24. 4. 4. 4.
100. 17T I7r I7T
63. b.368 .155 91.524
103. 5.646 .472 97.262
90. 000000 *««000 000000
6. 0*0««» *0000« 00«0«0
7. *0««*0 *0|l»«« 000000
L EFICIENCV USIN6
E : ,0001
OUT
i
IS DEFINED AS:
FOH X KAVS USING Y-HOIIK AVt^AGtS
I
i
i
a
«
7
10
ta
u
14
IB
It
17
I*
IB
20
21
22
23
24
U
26
27
28
n
so
31
32
33
34
30
38
37
3.
M
4O
41
42
43
44
49
4«
47
a
o
i
2
3
B4
99
9«
97
3«
oe
6O
61
62
63
ft 4
6S
eo
67
ftfi
eo
7O
71
72
3
4
9
-------
DAILY SUMMARY OF KESULTS
/Y
2
3
4
9
7
0
0
to
11
12
13
14
16
10
17
10
19
2O
21
22
23
24
2S
it
20
30
Jt
32
34
39
37
JO
4O
41
42
43
44
47
40
E
9ft
Sti
57
LOCATION: RICKENBACKEH AFb i9eo
DATE: 2-24-ao
TIME
" 0
100
200
300
400
5UO
600
700
00
900
1000
1200
1300
I«OO
1500
1600
.... > .1700.....
1 1800
£ 1900
2000
2100
2200
2300
AVERAGES
X Of DAIA
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MEAH
' STO.OEV.
X STO.OEV.
24-HOUR REMOVAL
1
(MEANJ £ , E
1 IN
y
LOAD t k
IN OUT
102. «**» **«*
102. **«»» »«*000
IDA. MMMMMM MMMMMM
102. ****** ******
107. 0000*0 000000
106. ****** *0»000
100. »*» «*««»»
«*., MMMMMM MMMMMM
102. ***«»* »0»*0«
107. »»*** 000000
115. ****** »»«**
US. «*««** «***0*
99. 5.524 .446
84. 5.406 .389
8st" 5^191 ^283
87. 5.349 .359
89. 5.619 .347
87. 5.464 .318
24. 9. 9.
100. 3ft., S«T
83. 5.191 .283
115. 5.736 .446
10. «««»» ******
10. *»* »*«
EFICIENCV USING
? .OQg*
OUT
i
NOTE! IMEAN) IS DEFINED AS:
X
THE MtAN f OK A DAYS ..USING T-HUU
tFF
0000*
«0**«
0000*
00000
000*0
0000*
*****
MHO*
00000
*****
00000
00*0*
»0*»*
91 .9
92.8
93. fl
94.5
93.3
93.8
94.2
93.2
9.
3H.
91.919
94.544
000000
*«»*«»
******
K AVERAGtS
a
3
4
B
7
9
to
II
12
1*
14
IB
17
ia
IB
20
21
22
23
24
29
20
27
20
2>
JO
31
32
3J
34
33
37
M
4O
41
42
43
44
45
4«
47
40
4»
50
Bl
52
63
64
55
50
57
0B
88
0O
61
02
63
69
60
87
60
09
70
71
72
73
74
7B
V
-------
DAILY SUMHAHV OF KESULTS
LOCATIONS RICHENBACKEH AFB 1900
DATE: 2-25-ao
TIME
0
100
200
300
400
... . 50.0
600
TOO
BOO
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
> ...7 0.0.
i iaoo
£ |90°
<" 200A
2100
2200
2Jj>0
« AVERAGES
1 OF OATA
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
,.. . -"fc»J« . -
STO.DEV.
X 8TD.OEV.
24-HOUR REMOVAL
1
iMfANJ fc , E
1 IN
i_ y_
LOAD E E
IN OUT
104. 5.734 .353
102. 5.794 .339
102T 5-l«7 T50. *««»»* *»»**>?
116. ***«* ***«*
106. *««« »««*»
106. *.?«! .lai
111. 5.605 .376
01. 5.577 .163
..fl.3.._. . S..J»8J ,32S
83. 5.626 .372
86. 5.590 .224
A6. %.«! ,as«
85. 5.401 ,4bb
05. b.423 .490
_.4?j.. -.5^fe2_ -*5JI1
24. 15. 15.
100. fcl- fcl.
61. 5.300 .141
116. 5.794 .541
100. ffl*M9 9*9S»»
11. «***«0 «««««
12. *«*«« «»«»««
EFICIENCV USING
tUOuZ
OUT
1
NOTE: CMEANJ is DEFINED AS:
»
THE MEAN FOR x u«ts USING Y-HUUM
EFF
93.8
94.1
oa.fl
94.2
93.3
an an a
*«»*«
«««*«
«««
*»«
«aaa»
«»»»
««»«
»
93.3
91.3
94.3
93.4
96.0
91.6
91.4
90.0
90.J
15.
61^
90.097
97.545
0*000
«*«»«
*«*« .
AVtRAGtS
i ^
a
*
4
7
to
II
12
11
14
IB
ia
IT
i*
i»
to
21
22
23
24
29
2>
27
!
!
JO
31
32
33
34
39
36
37
38
3*
4O
41
42
43
44
49
4>
47
48
4B
9O
91
12
B3
M
99
90
»7
98
B»
00
ei
92
03
69
60
67
60
6B
7O
71
72
73
74
79
V
-------
*
,J
4
22
21
24
25
2ft
27
«
/
30
31
32
33
34
13
le
31
3O
3»
40
41
42
43
44
43
40
47
4U
4B
30
31
32
33
34
sa
3fl
37
DAILY SUMMAUV OF KESULTS
LUCATIONI RICKENBACKEK AFB 1980
DATES 2-26-80
TIME
0
too
pan
300
400
500
600
700
an
900
1000
1100 .
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
> 1700
' 1800
5 noo
2000
2100
2200
2.300
AVERAGES
X OF OAIA
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MEAJt
STD.OEV.
X 3TO.OEV.
LOAD E i
IN
98. 5.263
98. 5.694
°". 547f? '
96. 000000
98. *00»»a
. 1U4. OttfttO
104. «*«*«*
104. *»*««
f, f«^i
118. 0
122. b.bb9
129. . b.t»7«» .
115. b.557
114. 5.706
»!«>. *.**'
121. b.530
105. 5.420
1U2L i.bOO
102. 5.369
104. 5.418
107T STa55
108. 5.469
102. 5.377
113, 5.385
24. 17. 24
100. 71. 10U
98. 5.263
129. 5.730
108, *0B0»»
9. «»»
9. «*«««* 2b
OUT
.61S
.617
%40
.733
.425
.589
.559
.728
.821
.877
.953
.017
.546
.309
.339
.441
.435
.57t»
.564
.663
.642-
.576
.774
.910
.109
.*53
.629
.167
.560
Iff
86.2
69. 2
8A ft
Hunan
aoaof
aaaaa
00*00
00000
00000
00000
B3.2
H5.6
90.2
94.6
9?. 7
92.0
92.0
89. 5
89.5
87.8
67.9
89.5
85.6
84.6
17.
71. :_...:
83.195
94.576
000000
000000
000000
24-HOUR REMOVAL EFICIENCY USING
1
(MEAN) £ , E : 000000X
1 IN
1
NOTE! (MEAN1
X
THE MEAN
OUT
i
IS DEFINED AS:
fUK X QATS UblNG
T-HUUK
AVtHȣ|iS
J
a
3
2fl
27
2«
29
JO
31
32
33
34
33
30
17
10
9>
40
41
41
43
44
40
4fl
47
48
4B
DO
Bl
92
S3
04
M
00
B7
91
»
eo
61
02
3
O3
M
07
oa
»
7O
71
72
73
74
7B
~>t
-------
DAILY SUMMAKY OF KESULTS
LOCATION! RICKEN8ACKEH AFU 1900
OATEJ 2-27-60
TIME LOAD E t
IN OUT
0 116. 5.274 .917
100 116. 5.397 .740
200 11*.. S.ll" .«#?
300 116. 5.250 .469
400 122. 5.2B2 .194
500 122. S.U5i .294
600 122. 5.566 .501
700 122. 5.412 .492
600 115T S.1A1 taan
900 124. -J.J20 .b56
1000 124. 000000 000000
.|I»Q.._. 124.. 000/J00 f«0ffffff
1200 125. 5.170 .250
1300 120. 5.292 .431
1500 129. 5.106 .667
1600 125. 5.111 .467
f J700 .. 132. b.106 .451
^ 1«00 120. 5.016 .279
CD 1^00 111. 5.124 .271
2000 111. 5.145 .315
2100 111. 5.324 .290
2200 114. b.523 .510
2300 114, 5.50U .ttStt
EFF
06.1
90.6
90.7
96.3
94.2
91.0
90.9
09.5
00000
«»#»#
95.2
91.9
66.9
90.9
91.2
94.4
94.7
93.9
94.6
90.8
04.4
0 AVERAGES 24. 22. 22. 22.
I OF DATA 100. «.?. 92, 92.
MINIMUM 111. 5.016 .194
MAXIMUM 132. 5.566 .917
MEAN 12.0. 5,25* ^4.77.
3TO.DEV. 6. .165 .193
I 8TO.DEV. 5. 3.143 40.429
24-HOUR REMOVAL EFICIENCY USING
1
(M.EANj Erf ^Ut9i^)(
1 IN OUT
. _ t. .. . ' .
NUTEi (MEAN] IS DEFINED AS:
X
THE Mt*N HIM x I>AYS U^ING Y-HUU*
62.614
96.329
3.569
3.925
~
,\
a
3
4
B
7
IO
II
IS
14
IB
IB
17
<
21
23
24
23
27
28
a>
JO
31
32
33
M
38
M
37
36
SO
40
41
42
43
44
4B
4B
47
48
4B
BO
at
B4
9B
SB
57
08
SB
BO
61
B2
03
r.4
65
6B
07
ea
B9
70
71
72
73
74
79
-------
DAILY SUMMAMY OF RESULTS
LOCATION: RICKENBACKEK AFU t9«o
DATE: 2-20-80
TIME LOAD E E
IN OUT
0 108. 5.297 .516
100 106. 5.062 .452
9OO 10*. *.fl*A ,M«
300 106. 5.27t> .383
400 106. 5.409 ,<461
..500 115^. i.164 ....379
600 115. 4.976 .372
700 US. 5.313 .482
oo If. *»1'5 ,*5#
900 127. 5.202 .470
1000 127. 5.467 .417
. 1100. 12J. 5.19H .307
1200 123. 5.324 .334
1300 123. 5.417 .314
1*00 l|fc. ftT9QS .Pfcfc
1500 116. 5.043 .349
1600 96. 5.163 .437
1 1000 115. 5.360 .657
vD 1*00 110. 5.315 .652
2000 110. 5-19fc ,fc!9
2100 114. b.59b .569
2200 119. 5.585 .612
» AVERAGES 24. 24. 24.
X OF DATA 100,. 100. 100, 1
| MINIMUM 96. 4.904 .266
MAXIMUM 127. 5.650 .657
STD.DEV. 7. .200 .117
X STD.DEV. 6. 3.79u 25.037
24-HOUR REMOVAL EFICIENCV USING
1
(MEANJ E > E ? 9U179J
! 1 IN OUT
v '
NOTE: (MEAN) IS DEFINED AS:
X
THE MEAN FOR X DATS USING Y-HUUK
.
J-
1
ll
L .. ._
EFF
90.3
91.1
««.S
92.7
91.5
92T7
92.5
90.9
91.1
91.0
92.4
94.1
93.7
94.2
Qfl.T
93.1
91.6
90.3
67.8
87.7
tta.l
89.8
89.0
89.5
24.
87.729
94.682
2.036
2.235
2
j
4
»
7
ID
II
12
IS
14
IB
!
17
IB
19
2O
21
aa
23
24
23
26
27
28
2»
90
32
39
36
J7
M
M
40
41
42
43
44
45
4C
47
5O
91
63
06
97
9«
80
6O
61
62
63
A4
63
O«
67
ea
69
70
71
72
3
4
9
y
-------
DAILY SUMMAHY OF RESULTS
LOCATION: RICKENBACKER AFB i9eo
DATE: 2-29-eo
TIME
0
100
300
400
500
600
700
600
900
1000
1100
1200
| 1300
I 1400
1500
1600
> 1700
1 1600
£ 1900
2000
2100
2200
2300
* AVERAGES
X OF DATA
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
ME AM
3TO.OEV.
X 8TO.DEV.
LOAD
98.
98.
90.
98.
98.
98.
98.
118.
132.
126*
120.
120,.
120.
109.
113.-
112.
118.
116.
122.
120.
24.
100T
98.
132.
uT
10.
E E
IN OUT
5.7lY ".657
5.361 .442
5.361 .4PU
5.575
5.574
5!361 !
S.074
5,359
5.203
5.394
5)405 !
5.382 .
5.390 -
5.282
5.152
"5l277 \
5.282 .
S.Sifc .
5.30tt
5.385
5.5«1 f
24. 24.
100. 100.
5.074
5.719
!l53~ I
2.646 20.
528
399
398
346
320
354
517
605
590
581
562
597
450
561
602
561
563
\
320
657
106
756
EF
88
91
92
90
92
93
93
93
91
90
08
OH
09
89
HA
91
91
92
89
88
A7
89
09
88
24.
00*
87.
93.
90.
1.
2.
24-HOUR REMOVAL EF1CIENCV USING
, 1 IN OUT
NOTE! (MEAN)
X
: THE MfcAN
1
t
IS DEFINED AS:
FQK X ()AY5 USIiYG Y
-HOUK
F
.5
.8
.4
.5
.8
.0
.6
.7
,.4 . .
.1
.8
.8
.2
.6
,9
.5
.9
.0
.4
.6
.4
.5
.2
006
696
916
116
AVERAGES -
a
3
a
7
10
11
11
11
14
IB
1.
17
IS
19
2O
21
22
23
24
23
26
27
26
t*
X
31
32
33
34
33
36
37
36
3D
4O
41
41
43
44
43
46
47
48
30
31
32
B3
B4
33
se
»7
38
BO
60
61
62
63
63
66
07
68
6»
70
71
72
73
74
73
V
-------
DAILY SUMMARY OF RESULTS
LOCATIONS RICKENBACKEH
OATEt 3- 1-80
TIME
0
100
2OO
300
400
_500
600
TOO
AOO
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
iaoo
1500
1600
1 1600
UJ 1900
^ 2OOO
2100
2200
2300
* AVERAGES
1 OF DATA
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MEAN.
STD.OEV.
X STO.OEV.
24-HOUR REMOVAL
i
(MEANJ t i f
': 1 IN
i
> y
LOAD E
IN
108. 5.630
106. 5.233
106. 5.296
110. 5.35u
111. b.3fl3 .
111. 5.430
111. 5.262
19*. V°l
134. 5.500
134. *«*««
.131. Ht.98fg.
131. ****«
131. »*««
127. 5.260
117. 5.24tt
122. 5.240
123. 5.323
194, S,107
126. 5.260
126. 5.254
24. 19.
1OO. 7«.
106. 5.221
134. 5.830
121. 5.336
10. .140
8. 2.629
AFB 1900
E
OUT
" .557
.414
!557
.54t»
.482
.535
gasaea
**««
***«
.33«;
.254
.244
.313
.370
1.053
1.071
. .491
19.
'«»
.244
1.071
.221
43.974
EFICIENCY USING
UUT
I
1 NOTES (MEAN] IS DEFINED AS:
X
': Trie HfcAN Kurt * OATS USiiiu Y-HUiiK
I.;
1-
1
EFF
90.4
92.1
92.6
91.9
U9.6
H9.8
»9.9
90.6
91.1
90.3
UttttOM
00000
««*««
*»*»
93.7
95.2
95.3
94.0
93.1
91 .0
bO.O
79.6
90.7
19.
79T
79.620
95.321
90.597
4.165
4.619
AVtKA&tS
i ^
a
3
4
7
10
II
12
13
14
11
1.
17
1*
20
21
22
23
24
23
26
27
26
t*
3D
31
32
33
33
.16
37
36
M
40
41
42
43
44
43
46
47
46
4.
80
81
31
83
34
83
36
37
36
80
6O
Al
62
63
64
63
66
66
69
70
71
72
73
74
73
V
-------
30 OPERATING DATS
SUMMAMY OF KE5MLT5
USING 1-HOUR AVERAGES
LOCATION*
DATES 1-25-80
AFH
LOAD.
fc. _________ -
IN
tFF
OUT
0 * AVERAGES 719. 622. 496.
X OF DATA 100. 86. 69. 59.
1 MINIMUM... 23. .4.020 .U97 77.«J«0 .
1 MAXIMUM 134. 6.935 1.166 98.207
MEAN 110. 5.380 .436 91.98tt
X STO.DEV. 9. 5.725 41.433 3^710
1Q-BAJ H£MDVAJ..££ItlEN£t USING,
1
(MEAN) I . E I 91.902X
10 1M OUT
2
1 Y
. fO.TE.»__lMEA_Nl 15 Cffl&EB .AS:
X
> THE MEAN FOR X OATS USING Y-HOUH AVERAGES
J .
8 U1
to
-2
I
4B
21
21
23
24
37
SB .
42
4J
4B
SO
91
. 1?
OJ
54
BS
ne
" 37
»B
5> .
BO
" Bl
B2
AB
B7
6B
~ ee
7O
73
74
-------
30 UPtRATINU DATS
SUMMAKY OK KESULTS
it
3
4
9
a
7
a
e
10
1 1
12
13
14
19
ia
17
ia
ia
20
21
u
23
24
29
29
27
2.
2.
30
31
32
33
34
39
J4
37
ja
3«
4O
41
42
43
44
45
47
49
50
92
»
14
USING
LOCA'I
DATES
J1ATE-
-26-00
-27-00
-20-00
-31-00
2- 1-00
2- 3-00
2- 4-00
2r. 5-00.
2- 7-00
2- 0-00
2-10-00
2-11-00
> 2-12-OP .. .
1 2-13-00
<£ 2-14-00
2-15-00
2-16-00
2-17-00
2-19-00
2-20-00
2-21-10
2-26-00
2-27-00
2-20-00
2-29-00
3- 1-00
» AVERAGES
X UF DATA
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MEAN
STD.OEV.
24-HOUR AVERAGES
1-25-00
LOAD .E. JL
IN OUT
107. 5.050 .534
110. 5.340 .373
108... .5.293 .416
113. 5.211 .546
113. 5.456 .452
114. 5.255 »»»»*
116. 5.422 .605
...11.0.._ 5.375 . .432.
113. 5.511 «**
109. 5.240 ««**»
l|2. S.«T» Tla|
111. 5.543 ****
113. 5.309 .439
Hi. 5.159 .200.
111. 5.126 «»«««»
109. 5.435 .219
101. S-fc78 «*
106. 5.650 ***«*
113. 5.653 .449
93. 5.565 .295
97. *»» .427
9, nmmmnm .a?p
100. «*»*» .620
120. 5.252 .477
115. 5.202 .466
US. 5.305 .509
121. S.330 .502
30. 27. 22.
97. 07. 71.
09. 4.710 .219
121. 5.710 .620
110. 5.375 .437
X STO.DEV. b. 4.123 23.730
30-fcAT PCMUVAL EFLCIENCt USING
24
CMEANJ E , E I 91.076X
SO IN OUT
Y
NyTfcS (MEANJ
X
THE MEAN
IS UEFINEU AS:
FOH X DAYS USING V-HUUH
#9.7
09.4
93.0
92.3
09.5
91.7
SIM*
oo.o
92.0
»*»
***»«
*»*»«
91.0
94.4
96.0
««*
92.0
94.7
94.6
**«
*««
90.9
91.2
90.6
90.6
19.
61.
6B.fl03
95.975
91.940
Z.OJh
2.216
AVbkAGES
a
JO
33
39
M
37
3.
M
4O
41
42
43
44
49
4«
47
4B
4ft
SO
91
92
93
94
99
99
97
98
9B
ao
at
02
83
64
63
ea
07
aa
ea
7O
71
72
73
74
79
'V
-------
FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION
LOCATION! RICKENBACKEM
STARTING DATE! 1-25-80
PARAMfTfRt 1-MOUH EIN.
AFB 1980
LH/MMHTIi
OCCURRENCt
PARAMETER RANGE FREQUENCY pEKCtwiAGE HISTOGRAM
3.000 - 3.400 0.
3.4JIO - 3.800 0-
3.800 - 4.200 1.
4.200 - 4.600 12.
4.600 - 5,000 55.
5.000 - 5.400 306.
5.400 - 5. BOO 331.
5.8.00 - 6.200 37.
6.200 - 6.600 2.
6.600 - 7.000 0.
0.
0.
0.
2.
7. »«*
41. ********«**
44. A*********************
5. *
0.
0.
BEYOND MIN/MAX RAN6E 3.
TOTAL POPULATION 747.
*f CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION
01
*> LOCATIONI RICKCNBACKER
DATE! 1-25-80
PARAMETER! 1-HOUR EIN,
AFH 19HO
LB/HMBTU
OCCURRENCE
PARAMETER RANGE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE HISTOGRAM
.000 - 3.400 0.
.000 - 3.800 0.
.000 - 4,200 1,
.000 - 4.600 13.
.000 - 5.000 66.
.000 - 5.400 374.
.000 - 5.800 705.
.000 - 6.200 742.
,000 - 6,600 744.
.000 - 7.000 744.
BEYOND MIN/MAX HANCF 3*
TOTAL POPULATION 747.
0.
0.
0.
2.
9. *****
SO. **********
100. ** ft***************** A*****************************
100. ft*************************************************
_.
a
3
4
7
a
10
11
12
13
14
10
te
IT
IB
19
2O
21
22
21
24
23
26
27
28
1*
10
31
32
33
34
39
36
37
38
X
4O
41
42
43
44
49
4«
47
4a
4»
9O
91
92
83
84
99
96
37
98
00
60
C 1
62
6.1
r.4
65
66
67
68
60
0
2
3
4
9
V
-------
FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION
LOCATION: RICKENBACKEH AFB i
STARTING DATE! 1-25-80
IYARAMFTFBI I.HnilB 1 nc FIM
OCCURRENCE
PARAMETER RANGE FREUUEHCY. PEK
.500 - .535 0.
.570 - .605 1.
.605 - .640 1.
_»6,4_0_ .675 17.
.675 - .710 110.
.710 - .745 425.
-745 TT«D lAfl.
.760 - .615 6.
.815 - .650 0.
BEYOND MIN'MAX RANGE 3.
TOTAL POPULATION 747.
> CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION
U1
,_n inCATfONi a i tLf.fttmc.it ra AFB |
DATE: i-25-eo
PARAMETER: I-HOUR LOG EIN
980
CtNTAbE
0.
0,
0.
0.
2.
15.
57.
1.
0.
- -
OCCURRENCE
PARAMETER RANGE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
.500 - .535 0.
.500 - .570 0.
.500 - .605 1.
.500 - .640 2.
.500 - .675 19.
.500 - .710 1^9,
.500 - ,7a5 554.
.500 - .780 738.
,5011 - ,8J5 744.
.500 - .850 744.
BEYOND MIN/HAX RANGE 3.
TOTAL POPULATION 747.
0.
0.
0.
0.
3.
11.
74.
99.
100.
100.
HlSlm.RAM
**»**
ft**************************
HISTOGRAM
*********
*************************************
A*************************************************
i ^
a
a
4
7
10
II
12
ia
14
IS
17
IB
IB
20
21
22
23
24
23
26
27
2B
2*
ao
31
32
14
33
.16
37
39
3»
40
41
42
43
44
49
49
47
SO
SI
92
B3
94
99
S9
57
98
BB
60
62
63
A4
63
66
67
69
-------
FNEUUENCY DISTRIBUTION
LOCATION: RICKENBACKEK AFB i960
STAHTINK DATES 1-25-60
PARAMFTFRi 1-HQIIB EOUT. LR/MMRTII
PARA M£
.010
.IS*
.306
.457
*606
.753
.904
l.QSI
1.202
1.351
BEYOND
TOTAL
JP
1
VI
TER RANGE .
.159
,.108
.457
.606
.904
1.053
- 1,202
- 1.351
1.500
OCCURRENCE
FREQUENCY PEHCENIAGE
29. 4.
150., : ;»*.
237.
154.
23.
6.
4.
0.
0.
36.
23.
IV.
3.
1.
0.
0.
HISTOGRAM
**
..A*.****.**.*.**
****»****
***********
*****
*******
*
MIN/MAX RANGE 0.
POPULATION 664.
CUMULATIVE
__LDCAT1DJI1_
DISTRIBUTION "
RICKEMBACKFR AFB I9«0
DATE: i-25-eo
; PARAMETER! 1-HOUR EOUT,
PARAMETER RANGE
.010
.010
_,010
.010
.010
.010
.010
.010
,010
.010
BEYOND
TOTAL
.159
.306
,457
.606
.755
.904
- 1.053
- 1.202
- 1,351
1.500
JUN/MAX JIAJI
POPULATION
LB/MHBTU
OCCURRENCE
FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
25.
175.
412.
566.
631,
6*4.
660.
664.
664,
664.
GE 0,
664.
4.
26.
62.
65.
95.
48.
99.
100.
100.
100.
HISTOGRAM
**
*************
*******************************
ft******************************************
A***********************************************
A*********************************************
.I**********************************************
**************************************************
-
A
*
9
4
23
1C
«
10
31
>t
35
3«
37
98
4O
41
42
43
44
48
48
47
48
4*
9O
81
92
93
84
55
57
88
90
CO
61
02
91
e5
a«
07
B9
as
70
71
72
73
74
n
-------
FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION
LOCATION! R1CKENBACKER
STARTING DATE! 1-35-80
PABAUfTFDt I.UQUB LnC
OCCUR
PARAMETER RANliE FHEUUENCT
-2.000 - -1.TB2 0.
l.TAj» . .I.Sfc* 4.
-1.564 - -1.346 1.
1.306 - -1.128 0.
. ... -1.12IL- -.910 7.
-.910 - -.698 50.
-.692 -.474 163.
.? *T9Sfc 'PO.
-.856 - -.038 133.
-.036 - .180 0.
BEYOND HIM/MAX RANGE 10.
TOTAL POPULATION 664.
f CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION
01
-O LOCATIONS RICKEMBACKFfl
DATE: i-25-eo
PARAMETER: I-HOUR LOG
AFU 1900
tOMT
RENCt
PFHCfcNIAKE HISTOGRAM
0.
0.
0.
0.
1- *
8. ***
25. ****
45. ***«*******«*»***^«***
20 . *»«»»
0.
AFR |«MO
EOUT
OCCURRENCE
PARAMETER RAN6E FREUUENCY PERCENTAGE HISTOGRAM
-2.000 - -1.782 0.
-2.000 - -1.564 0.
-2,i»00 - -1.346 1.
2.000 - -1.128 1.
2.000 -.910 8.
2. OOp -,692 5«,
-2.000 - -.474 221.
-2.000 - -.256 521.
2,009 -»018 654.
-2.000 .160 654.
MFVQMD MIM/MAK BAMCF 10.
TOTAL POPULATION 664.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
9. *
33. ********
78. **»*«*****»*
9tt, A************************************************
98. ****«*»*******
- -
r'
a
j
4
7
10
1 1
12
11
14
IB
16
17
18
1O
20
21
22
23
24
29
2<
27
2B
t*
fa
3t
32
S3
Vi
39
3fl
37
38
M
4O
41
42
43
44
49
4a
47
48
40
5O
91
92
83
94
89
96
87
98
00
eo
et
82
83
n
«e
7
ae
60
70
71
72
73
74
79
V
-------
FREQUENCY 0 1 S ! R I BUT I ON
LOCATION: RICKENBACKER AFU i9»o
STARTING DATE! 1-25-60
PAHAMETEHl 1-HOUH X EFFICIENCY
OCCURRENCE
PARAMETER RANGE . FREUUENCY PEKCtNTAtE HlSTObRAM
60.000 - 63.990 0.
61.990 - 67.980 0,
67.980 - 71.970 0.
71.970 - 75.960 0.
75^960 - 79.950 3.
79.950 83.9(10 15.
5.940 - 67.930 «7.
7.MO - 91.920 200-
91.920 - 95.9JO 303.
95.910 - 99.900 0.
0.
... 0,
o.
0.
0.
2. «
7. ***
Jt, *******»*»***
<48, ******************
0.
BEYOND MIN/MAX RANGE 68.
TOTAL POPULATION 636.
f ~ ~ CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION
Ul
00 LOCATION! RICKENBACKER
AFB 1980
DATE: t-25-60
PARAMETER: I-HOUR x EFFICIENCY
OCCURRENCE
PARAMETER RANGE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE HISTOGRAM
60.000 - 63.990 0.
60.000 - 67.960 0.
60,000 - 71,970 0_.
60.000 - 75.960 0.
60.000 - 79.950 J.
60.000 - 83.940 i8-
60. 000 - 67.930 65.
60.000 - 91.920 265.
60j,000 - 95.910 566.
60.000 - 99.900 568.
BEYOND MIN/MAX RANGE 68.
TOTAL POPULATION 636.
-
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
10. *****
-------
FREUUENCV DISTRIBUTION
LOCATIONS RICKENBACKEH
STARTING DATES 1-25-80
AFB 1900
OCCURRENCE
PARAMETER RANGE _ . FHEUUENCI.. . PERCENTAGE HISTOGRAM
.700 - .730 f,
.710 . T7fcO .V"r ''''
.760 - .790 0.
.790 - .820 0.
. ^B2J> ...... .850 ... Q.
.850 - .880 0.
.880 - .910 4.
.«ia . t««a *«s.
.940 - 1.970 337.
.970 - 2.000 0.
o*
0.
0.
0. . . .
0.
1.
T , *»»
53. »»*»*»***
0.
BEYOND MIN/MAX RANGE 250.
TOTAL POPULATION 636,
f CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION
01
ID LOCATION! RICKFMBACKFR
AFA 1980
DATE! 1-25-80
PARAMETER! 1-HOUR LOGU EFFICIENCY)
OCCURRENCE
ARAMCTCR RANGE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE HISTOGRAM
1.700 - 1.730 0.
1.700 - 1.760 0.
1.700 - 1.790 0.
1.700 - 1.820 0.
1.700 - 1.850 0.
1.700 - iTaao 0T
1.700 - 1.910 4.
1.700 = 1.940 «9.
1,700 - 1*970 Jflfr.
1.700 - 2.000 386.
BEYOND HIM/MAC RAHBF 2«0.
TOTAL POPULATION 636.
0.
o.
0.
0.
0.
0*
1.
8. *»*
61. »*»**«»*»**
a
3
33
34
39
in
37
38
41
42
43
44
43
48
47
48
49
9O
91
92
93
94
33
98
37
98
8O
8O
81
82
83
84
83
88
87
88
7O
71
72
73
74
79
V
-------
FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION
LOCATION! RICKENBACKEH A
STARTING DATE: i-as-oo
PARAMETER! 1-HOUR 100-1
OCCURH
... . PARAMETER RftNGE FHEUgENCJL
.010 - 4.009 63.
.009 S.OOfl 296T
8.008 - 12.007 211.
12.007 J 6.006 48.
16.gOfr -.20.005 14.
20.005 - 24.004 4.
24.004 - 28.003 0.
28.001 - 32.002 0.
32.002 36.001 0.
36.001 - 40.000 0.
BEYOND MIN/MAX KANGE 0.
TOTAL POPULATION 636.
FB 1980
..EFFICIENCY
ENCE
PEKCtNfAGE
10.
«7.
33.
».
2.
1.
0.
o.
0.
0.
HISTOGRAM
*****
****
*****
A****************
****
^ CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION
O>
O LOCATION! RICKEMBACKER AFB I9fl0
DATE: 1-25-80
PARAMETER: I-HOUK loo-x
EFFICIENCY
OCCURRENCE
PARAMETER RANGE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
.010 - 4.004 63.
.010 - 8.008 359.
,010 - 12,007 570,
.010 » 16.006 618.
.010 20.005 632.
.010 24.004 636.
.010 - 28.003 636.
.010 - 32.002 636.
,010 - 36,001 636.
.010 - 40.000 636.
BEY QUO HIM/MAIL RAMGE 0.
TOTAL POPULATION 636.
10.
56.
90.
97.
99.
100.
100.
100.
100.
100.
HISTOGRAM
*****
A***************************
A************************************************
to************************************************
*************. ******************************^
A*************************************************
A*************************************************
- -
A
2
3
4
a
a
7
9
10
II
11
13
14
IB
!
IT
ie
t«
20
21
22
2>
24
23
2<
27
ie
t*
30
31
32
33
34
33
3 ft
ST
3B
3«
4O
41
42
43
44
49
4«
47
48
49
9O
91
92
93
94
99
9«
S7
99
90
eo
2
3
4
65
69
67
08
ee
7O
71
72
73
74
79
7 a/
-------
FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION
LOCATION: RICKENBACKEH
STARTING DATES 1-2&-80
PARAMFTFRl JvMQIIB |_"G'
AFB 1980
100. I FFFtrlFMrVl
OCCURRENCE
PARAHEJER RANGE FHEUUfNCY PFHCFNlAtE HISTOURAM
2.000 -1.640 0. .
»iT8»aa m .t.PAo a.
1.280 - -.920 0.
-.920 - -.560 0.
-.560 - -,2UO 1,
.200 - .160 0.
.160 .520 38.
f^PO » TJIAfi ?*^.
.880 - 1.240 304.
1.240 - 1.600 0.
0.
0 '
0.
0.
0.
0.
6. **
*t ».*»»»;»;*»»«;»'
48. »*»»*«*«**«
0.
BEYOND MIN/MAX RANGE 8.
TOTAL POPULATION 636.
? CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION
0.
M LQCAT1OMI fflCKEMAACKER
APR 1980
DATE: i-25-eo
PARAMETER! 1-HOUR LOGUOO-X EFFICIENCY)
OCCURRENCE
PARAMETER RANGE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE HISTOGRAM
2.000 - -1.640 0.
2.000 - -1.200 0.
-2.000 - -.920 0.
2.000 -.560 0.
2.000 - -.200 1.
2.0QO .160 i;
2.000 - .520 39.
2.000 - .860 324.
-2.000 - 1,240 628.
2.000 1.600 628.
1 BEYOND MIN/MAX RAMCF B,
' TOTAL POPULATION 636.
'
:
»
i
i
i
t
5
7
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
o.
6. . *
51, »***» «***»*«*»**
99. «»««»«»**«« *«***************************4*
99. * ************************
... ..
- -
i ^
X*
30
31
32
34
33
36
37
38
3O
4O
41
41
41
44
43
46
47
48
40
3O
91
32
B3
94
99
96
97
38
80
eo
62
63
66
67
60
69
7O
71
72
7.1
74
79
V
-------
FNFUIIENCV DISTRIBUTION
LOCATIONS RICKEN8ACKER AFB 1980
STARTING DATES 1-25-60
»ABAMFTFRt 3«-MQUB FINf LH/MMflTy
PARAMETER
3.000 - 3.400
OCCURRENCE
. FHEUUEJIC.! PERCENTAGE
HISTOGRAM
3.600
4.200
5.000
5.400
5.600
6.200
6.600
4.200
4.600
5.000
5.400
5.600
6.200
6.600
7.000
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
14.
12.
0.
BEYOND MIN/MAX RAN6E
TOTAL POPULATION
0.
0.
0.
27.
0.
fl.
0.
0.
4.
52.
44.
_0_.
0.
0.
10
It
A*********************
A******************
IS
14
IB
ia
IB
20
12
23
24
" 2J'
20
27
N)
CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION
LOCATIONS RlCKENftACKER AFH IQftQ
DATES 1-2S-BO
PARAMETER: 24-HOUR EIN, LH/MMBTU
PARAMETER RANBE
.000 -
.000 -
3.400
3.600
.000 - 4.600
.000 » 5.000
.000 « 5.400
OCCURRENCE
FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
HISTOGRAM
0.
0.
0,
6.
I.
15.
.000 - 5.600 27.
.000 - 6.200 27.
100.0 _-..6^600 27.
.000 7.000 27.
0.
0.
...Q..
0.
4.
11
132
l»
37
38
3O
49
4«
47
48
40
SO
91
100.
100.
loo.
100.
A*************************************************
******************<
ft*************************************************
99
ne
BEYQMD MIN/MAI BAMBg
TOTAL POPULATION
0.
27.
71
72
' 73
74
79
-------
FREUUENCY DISTRIBUTION
r LOCATION: RICKENBACKEK
2 STARTING DATE! 1-2S-80
AFB 1980
4
OCCURRENCE
." :._. _ PARAMETER. RANGE FKEUUEN.CI PERCENTAGE
7
.500 - .535 0. 0.
10 .570 - .605 0.
" .605 - .640 0.
11 .6j»g - ..675 1. .
13 .675 - .710 2.
.710 - .745 18.
19 -T» .7*0 fc.
' .780 - .815 0.
17 .815 - .850 0.
ta
" BEYOND MIN/MAX RANGE 0.
20 TOTAL POPULATION 27.
21
22
23
24
" *f CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION
z« a\
" tO LOCATION! RlCKFNftACKEB
" DATEJ 1-25-80
28 PARAMETER: 24-HOUR LOG
3O
0.
0.
. . 4.
7.
67.
0.
0.
AFB |«40
EIN
31 OCCURRENCE
32 PARAMETER RANGE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
33
34 .500 - .535 0.
38 .500 - .570 0.
34 .500 - .605 0.
37 .500 - .640 0.
" .500 - .675 1.
» .500 . -710 1,
40 .500 - .745 21.
41 ,500 - .780 «!7.
" .500 -_ .815 27.
43 .500 .850 27.
«4
" QEVOND MIN/MAI RANGE 0.
46 TOTAL POPULATION 27.
47
4U
**
3.
0.
0.
0.
0.
4.
1 1 .
7«.
100.
loo.
100.
HISTOGRAM
**. . .
«...
**»*»«»
.......*
HISTOGRAM
..
......
»«»»«*««»»*»»»»»»»»»*«»»»*»»»»»*»»**
..................................................
93
54
3
a
3
4
7
10
1 1
11
13
14
IB
17
16
ig
20
21
22
23
24
23
27
2a
30
31
32
JJ
34
33
36
37
sa
3*
40
4 1
42
43
44
43
46
47
.a
40
30
31
32
63
B4
33
56
57
sa
60
eo
A4
6*
67
00
70
71
72
73
74
73
-------
FHEOUENCY DISTRIBUTION
LOCATION: RICKENBACKEH AFB i9ao
STARTING DATE: 1-25-80
.PARAMETERS 24-HOUR EOUT. LR/MMRTU
PARAMETER RA.NGE
.010
.159
.308
.457
. . . ..606.
.755
.904
1-055
1.202
1.351
BEYOND
TOTAL
.159
-JOB
.457
.606
r ,755
.904
- 1.0S3
. 1,202
- 1.351
1.500
OCCURRENCE
FREUUENCY PERCENTAGE H1STOURAM
0.
<».
8.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
IB. ****.
41. »«*»*
36. «***»****
5. . .
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
MIN/MAX RANGE 0.
POPULATION 22.
1
CUMULATIVE
LOCATIONS
DISTRIBUTION
ICKEMAACKER AFB 14AO
DATE: i -25-80
PARAMETER: 24-HOUR EOUT,
PARAMETER RANGE
.010
.010
.010
.010
.010
.010
.010
. ... .010
.010
BEYOND
TOTAL
.159
.308
.45? ....
.606
.755
.904
- 1.053
- 1.351
LB/MMBTU
OCCURRENCE
FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE HISTOGRAM
0.
4.
13.
21.
2t.
- 1.500 22.
JtlNy.MA.JL BAMRE 0 .
POPULATION
22.
0.
18. ««»»**
95. *»«»**»««»***»******
100. *»*»»»*»**»**«***»» .
(00, A************* *.*******************:******»»**»«>»*.i
100. *****
loO. *««
100. *****
100. *****
*!*!"!. "IIIIir.IIII.II. ..III. I".!.."!""
A*******************************************
.... ----- -
TV
10
33
39
3A
37
M
39
4O
42
43
44
49
4«
47
4.
4.
9O
91
92
93
99
9<
97
9.
99
0
:;
"
63
60
07
ea
OB
0
1
2
3
4
9
-------
FNEUUENCY DISTRIBUTION
LOCATIONS R1CKENBACKEH
STARTING OATEI 1-35-60
AB^MFTfDl ?«.MQIIB Lnt
AFU I960
POUT
OCCURRENCE
PAR1M£I£8 RANEE . FK£UU£1*CJL ._ PEKCENIAGE
.2.000 - -1.782 o,
tr'*2 !.** 0.
-1.564 - -1.316 0.
-1.346 - -1.128 0.
-U12jHL.-_..-«,910. _ Q.
-.»IO - -.692 0.
-.6*2 - -.474 4.
v.AT* >StV ]t
-.256 - -.038 8.
-.030 - .ISO 0.
8EYONO NIN/MAX RANGE 0.
TOTAL POPULATION 22.
l£j
1 CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION
(^
d (nr»T|nMi BincrMBACKrii
DATE: l-as-eo
PARAMETER! 20-HOUR LOG
0.
0
0.
0.
- 0.
0.
18.
73.
9.
0.
A*V |QAO
EOUT
OCCURRENCE
PARAMETER RAN6E FREBUENCV PERCENTAGE
2.000 - -1.782 0.
-2.000 - -1.560 0.
-2.000 - -1.346 0.
-2.000 - -1.128 0.
-2.000 - -.910 0.
-2.000 - -.692 0.
-2.000 - -.074 4.
-2.000 - -.256 20,
-2jOOO - -^038 22.
-2.000 - .180 22.
BEYOMD HIM/MAI RAMCF 0.
TOTAL POPULATION 22.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0T
18.
91.
10P.
100.
. HISTObHAM . ..
***
. . *ft*ft**AA*ft*ft*ftft***ftft*fr4*4ft***^*4*^**
*****
HISTOGRAM
****
A*******************************************
«*********************************************ft*ft
A************************************************
i^
i
3
4
7
10
11
13
14
IB
I*
17
18
I*
30
21
22
21
24
29
2<
27
2fl
t*
to
31
32
13
34
33
in
37
31
30
40
41
42
43
44
43
4e
47
46
49
3O
SI
32
B3
B4
09
Be
97
96
OS
eo
01
2
03
84
O3
ee
7
oa
69
7O
71
72
73
74
76
V
-------
FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION
LOCATION: RICKENBACKEH AFB i960
STARTING DATE: i-25-so
PARAMETfRl 24-MOUR « EFFICIENCY
OCCURRENCE
, .-PARAMETER -RANGE . FKEUUE.NJCJL PEKCENUGE
60.000 - 63.990 0.
4J-990 . A7.9BO 0T
67.980 - 71.970 0.
71.970 - 75.960 0.
7§.9|»g - 79.959 0.
79.950 - 83.940 0.
65.940 87.930 0.
87.930 - 91.920 10,
91.920 - 95.910 8.
95.910 - 99.900 0.
BEYOND MIN/MAX RANGE 1.
TOTAL POPULATION 19.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
o!
HISTOGRAM
A********************
"f CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION
<7> LOCATION! RICKENIACKFR
AFB 1980
DATE: i-25-so
PARAMETER: 24-HOUR X EFFICIENCY
OCCURRENCE
PARAMETER RANGE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
60.000 - 63.990 0.
60.000 - 67.980 0.
60.000 - 71.970 0.
60.000 - 75.960 0.
60.000 - 79.950 0.
60.000 83.940 0.
60.000 - 87.930 0.
60.000 - 91.920 10.
60*000 - 95.9JO l«t
60.000 - 99.900 18.
BEYOND MIN/MAX RANfiE 1.
TOTAL POPULATION 19.
0.
0.
0.
0.
. o.
fl-
0.
53.
.. .. . 95.
95.
HISTOGRAM
4
*«*»«»*«****»***
ft**********************************************
a*********************************************
i
1
3
4
B
7
to
1 1
11
13
14
IB
18
17
18
20
11
11
21
14
23
17
t*
JO
31
32
33
14
39
37
38
39
4O
41
4J
44
49
47
48
49
91
92
93
B4
B9
98
07
B«
99
8O
ei
82
83
A4
89
86
87
88
89
70
71
72
7J
74
-------
FREUUENCV DISTRIBUTION
A
1*
1 4
B
7
0
IO
1 1
12
14
13
ia
17
18
IB
20
21
U
21
24
28
28
27
2»
30
11
12
11
»
17
18
IB
4O
41
42
41
44
43
48
47
At
49
3O
3 1
32
31
34
Sf.
37
LOCATION: RICKENBACKER AFB i960
STARTING DATE: i-25-ao
0ADAUfTfBI ?«.MQfJR |_06(I EFFICIENCY)
OCCURRENCb
PARAMETER RANGE FREUUENCY PFKf.tNTAKF HISTOGRAM
.700 - .730 0.
.760 - .790 0.
.790 - .820 0.
.aau .-.. ,B:»O o»
.650 - .aao o.
.880 - .910 0.
T«IO ,9«0 A.
1.940 - .970 14.
1.970 - 2.000 0.
0.
-'-' 0. - -
0.
0.
0. ... . _
0.
0.
74. ****************>
0.
BEYOND MIN/MAX RANGE 5.
TOTAL POPULATION 19.
^ CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION
0 LOCATION! RICKFMBACKFB
AFR 19AQ
DATE: i-25-so
PARAMETER: 24-HOUR LOG(X EFFICIENCY)
OCCURRENCE
PARAMETER RANGE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE HISTOGRAM
.700 - .730 0.
.700 - .760 0.
.700 - .790 0.
.700 - .820 0.
.700 - .850 .
.700 - .910 0.
.700 - .940 0.
.700 - .9/0 14.
1.700 - 2.000 14.
HEVOND MIN/MAX RANGE 4.
TOTAL POPULATION 19.
1
r - ' "~ ~
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
o.
7
-------
FHEUUENCV DISTRIBUTION
LOCATION: RICKENBACKEH AFB i9«o
STARTING DATE: 1-25-00
PARAMFTERl 24-HOUR 100-1 FFFJPIFNrY
OCCURRENCE
PARAMETE" RANGE FHEUUENCY PEKCILNTAGE HISTOGRAM
.010 4.009 0.
4.009 - 6.00A 9.
6.000 - 12.007 10.
12.007 - 16.006 0.
16^006 - 20,005 Q.
20.005 - 24.004 0.
24.004 - 26.003 0.
26.003 - 32.002 Ot
32.002 - 36.001 0.
36.001 - 40.000 0.
0.
S3. **» ******.*»***
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
BEYOND MIN/MAX RAN6E 0.
TOTAL POPULATION 19.
"f CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION
0° LOCATIONI RICKENHACMFR AFB 1980 .
DATE: 1-25-00
PARAMETER: 24-HOUR 100-1
EFFICIENCY
OCCURRENCE
PARAMETER RANGE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE HISTOGRAM
.010 - 4.009 0.
.010 - 0.000 9.
_*010 - 12,007 19.
.010 16.006 19.
.010 - 20.005 19.
-010 24T004 19-
.010 - 20.003 19.
.010 - 32.002 19.
,010 36,001 .. 19.
.010 40.000 19.
BEYQND MTN/MAI HANBF 0*
TOTAL POPULATION 19.
0.
47. *****»*«**«»****»*
JV°. *»«»»»»«*«*«**«»***********»*****;*
too. «**********«**'********»
100. *»»»***»»»«»«»**«».****»*»**********
100. A*************************************************
100. A*************************************************
....
2
3
4
7
9
10
1 1
12
13
14
ta
te
17
IS
20
21
22
23
24
2«
27
28
t*
JO
31
32
33
34
30
37
M
X
40
41
41
43
44
4B
4.
47
46
49
9O
91
92
03
54
99
'
eo
eo
2
3
7
7
\
-------
FNEUUENCY DISTRIBUTION
LOCATION! RICKENBACKEK
STARTING DATE! 1-25-80
PARAMETER RAWGE
2.000 - 1.640
-1.280 - -.920
-.920 - -.560
-»S6Q - -.200
.200 - .160
.160 .520
.880 - 1.240
1.240 1.600
AFB 1980
OCCURRENCE
FKEUUENCJf . HEKCtNTAGE HISTOGRAM
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
13.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
5?, »**. ***»»»»»«*;
°*
BEYOND MIN/MAX RANGE 0.
TOTAL POPULATION 19.
I CUMULATIVE
*O LOCATION!
DISTRIBUTION
RICBEMBACKFB
*m IQMO
DATE: i-25-ao
PARAMETER! 24-HOUR LOG(100-X EFFICIENCY)
PARAMETER RAN6E
2.000 - -1.640
2.000 - -1.280
2.000 - -.560
2.000 -.200
OCCURRENCE
FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE HISTOGRAM
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
Q._
2.000 - .520 0.
-2.000 - .880 6.
! -2,000 - 1,240 19,
2.000 - 1.600 19.
BEYOND MIN/MAX RANCE 0.
TOTAL POPULATION
j
'.
\
\
1
'
1
19.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
100. »*««»«»*«««**»»»«»«««*«»««
100. *........**»»..*.*».....*.***.».*..*..».......*«..
-
1^
»
X*
JO
31
32
S3
34
33
30
37
39
30
4O
41
41
43
44
43
40
47
48
4ft
90
51
32
B3
34
33
B6
57
30
BO
00
01
02
03
f>4
bS
e«
07
08
00
70
71
72
73
74
73
-------
DAILY SUMMAHY OF RESULTS
IUIAI 1U
DATE:
TIME
0
too
200
300
400
600
700
00
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
>iaoo
^,1900
02000
2100
2200
2300
AVERAGES
X OF DAT*
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MEAN
3TO.OEV.
X 8TD.OEV.
24-HOUR REMOVAL
1
(ME.ANJ fe , F
1 IN
r
NJ KJlKCNBAlfte
3- 2-80
LOAD E
IN
140. 5.221~
140. 5.326
|40. S,«5
140. 5.193
140. 5.154
HO. _ 5.054
140. 5.171
140. 5.133
I«ST s. in
133. 5.174
137. 5.183
135t_ 5.195
127. 5.077
127. 5.000
125. .781
125. .813
114. .657
H3. ,94J
116. .949
117. .985
119. .027
120. 5.004
123. 4.990
125. 5.086
24. 24.
100T 100.
113. 4.781
145. 5.326
10. .140
8. 2.752
K Ar- b 110
E
OUT
" .432
.425
.193
.264
.lib
.413
.342
.266
.205
.267
.420
.299
.283
.206
.274
.**?*#*
******
******
******
******
17.
71.
.146
******
******
V
Iff
91.7
92.0
96.3
94.9
91.0
92.0
93.3
94.8
96.0
94.6
91.9
94.1
94.3
95.7
94.4
*****
*****
*****
*****
17.
71,
91.731
96.956
******
******
EFICIENCY USING
OUT
NOTE* (MEAN) IS DEFINED AS:
X
THE MfcAN FOH * DATS USING Y-HUUK
AVL»AGtS '
2
3
4
B
7
9
10
11
12
t4
IB
18
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
23
20
27
28
30
31
32
£3
34
33
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
43
48
47
48
a
0
i
2
3
84
33
38
37
B9
«0
01
o:
63
86
O7
on
OB
70
71
72
73
74
73
TV
-------
DAILY SUMMARY OF RESULTS
LOCATION: RICKENBACKEH AFH I9«o
DATE: 3- 3-ao
TIME
0
100
.00
300
400
5.0D -
600
700
flOO
900
1000
11VQ
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
hK. I700
f 1800
^j 1900
M 2000
2100
2200
2300
9 AV.MA6C8
1 OF DATA
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
8TO.DEV.
1 STD.DEV.
LOAD E E
IN OUT
131. 5.0*3 **»*
132. 4.971 «
jf_. 9.«.f«- M-fffl*
136. 5.190 .171
136. 5.147 .354
136. 5.25b .387
134. 5.100 .392
134. 5.163 .433
124. 5.210 .452
109. 5.106 .444
126.. b.jeb .551
120. 5.476 .699
128. 5.492 .697
117, «,AA- ,-*
117. 5.424 .522
115. 5.221 .461
117. .5.1411 .451
118. 5.244 .367
120. 5.275 .458
121. «.21« ,501
122. 5.317 .467
124. 5.543 .474
125. 5.450 .bOO
84. 24. 21.
100. 100. MM.
109. 4.971 .171
136. 5.543 .699
125, 5.259 ,462
0. .156 .111
6. 2.969 ai. 919
EFF
«««*«
**«*
96.7
93.1
92.6
92.4
91.6
91.3
91.4
89.6
87.2
_7.3
91 .5
90.4
90.0
91.2
93.0
91.3
40,1
91.2
91.4
90.6
21.
A«,
07.230
96.696
91.291
1.940
2.134
24-HOUR REMOVAL EFICIENCV USING
1
[MEANl 1 I E : 91.2081
1 IN
V
NOTES (MEAN)
X
OUT
IS DEFINED AS:
FQn A 5ai5 US INS T=Hvun
....... - . . ... _____
3
4
9
7
10
1 1
12
13
14
IB
17
2O
21
22
23
24
29
26
27
36
K
31
32
39
37
3*
3*
4O
41
42
43
44
49
49
47
48
49
90
91
92
93
94
93
B«
97
98
99
6O
61
62
63
64
B9
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
74
79
'V
-------
DAILY SUMMARY OF RESULTS
LOCATION: RICKENBACKEH AF« I9ao
DATES 3- 4-60
TIME
LOAD
EFF
IN
OUT
0
100
200
300
400
500 -
" 600
700
BOO
900
1000
}100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
.L7.QO. _.._
fieoo
s^900
M2000
2100
2200
2300
122.
122.
122*
122.
122.
122..
122.
122.
125.
128.
121.
11.?*..
110.
110.
106,
106.
95.
. 92...
90.
92.
91.
94.
95.
._.. _ .?»-..
5.1*7
5.019
5,017
5.022
r>.oi4
5.050 .
5.056
4.971
T79P
4.719
4.628
..4.491
5.142
5.124
5.052
5.027
5.047
5.g«0
5.133
5.115
5.063
4.92B
5.006
.-}. .«$!.-
.460
.437
»a«7
.263
.330
.322
.389
.366
Tfloa
.362
.376
.326
.273
.205
,215
.229
.195
.207
.266
.225
.202
.264
.313
.266
90.6
91.3
91.1
94.6
93.4
93.6
92.3
92.2
. 91.6
92.3
91 .9
92.7
94.7
96.0
95.1
95.5
96.1
95.9
94.8
95.6
96.0
94.6
93.7
94.7
AVERA6E8
X OF DATA
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MEAN. . ._. .
3TO.OEV.
X 8TD.DEV.
24. i
100. 11
90.
14.
12.
f
4.491
5.142
1.986
.165
3,110
24.
100.
.195
.085
47.694
24.
U0.._
90.629
9t>.138
93.790
1.773
1.890
24-HOUR REMOVAL EFICIENCV USING
I
.t. . E :
1 IN OUT
NOTEi [MEAN) IS DEFINED AS:
X
THE MtAN FOR X PAYS USING Y-HUUk
71
72
-------
DAILY SUMMARY OF RESULTS
LOCATION! RICKENBACKER AFH i960
DATE! 3- 5-60
TIME
0
100
aoo
300
400
1 500
600
700
DO
900
1000
1104
1200
1300
1500
1600
^ 170ft
7 1800
-01900
CO 200O
2100
2200
AVERAGES
X Or DATA
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MEAN
STO.OEV.
I STD.OEV.
LOAD E E
IN
67. 4.859
67. 4.673
ft1. 5.f1f '
67. 5.011
67. b.051
61. 5.079
61. 5.021
81. 5.006
106. 5.143
106. 5.063
104. 4.936
106. 5.206
105. 5.290
III. *.?"
111. 5.766
111. 5.493
111. 5_.S47
110. 5.461
117. 5.564
Itfc. *.M*
110. 5.727
117. 5.774
117^ _i*75/
24. 24. 24
100T IOOT 100
81. 4.659
117. 5.774
102. 5.261
13. .311
13. 5.185 36
24-HOUR REMOVAL EFICIENCY USING
i
CMEANJ E , E ? «»i,9<>3«;
1 IN OUT
t
NOTE: IMEANJ
X
THE MKAN
L
r~
i
IS DEFINED AS:
FOR X DAYS USING
EFF
OUT
.210 95.7
.196 95.9
.312 93.6
.353 92.9
.34U 93.3
.336 93.4
.306 93.9
.310 93.6
.300 94.2
.569 66.6
.469 90.5
.370 92.9
.454 91.4
.365 99.2
.743 67.1
.874 64.1
.610 69.0
.429 92.1
.560 90.0
.«>} 92.0
.460 92.0
.469 91.9
.498 91.4
24.
. too.
.198 84.064
.874 95.931
,430 91.947
.159 2.668
.891 2.923
Y-HUUH AVERAGES ' .
i ^
2
3
4
7
10
II
If
13
14
18
16
17
18
20
21
22
23
24
23
26
27
28
t*
JO
31
32
33
34
33
36
37
38
39
4O
41
42
43
44
49
46
47
48
40
90
81
32
93
94
99
96
97
98
80
60
6t
62
63
04
e6
68
6tl
7O
71
72
7J
74
73
V
-------
DAILY SUMMARY OF RESULTS
LOCATION: RICKENBACKEK AFB 1980
OATEJ 3- 6-so
TIME LOAD E E EFF
IN OUT
0
too
200
300
400
S.g.o_.._.._ .:.
600
700
800
900
1000
... LJOO
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
1700
>1«00
^]1«00
I&2000
2100
2200
2300
105.
105.
ID'S,
105.
105.
.185...-.
105.
105.
U«,
121.
121.
12J.
115.
131.
111.
131.
134.
125.
115.
115.
US.
112.
11*.
._ J15.
5.462
5.S70
S.««4
5. 570
5.439
5,t8(J
5.566
5.642
5.1.21
5.706
5.655
6.2.29.
5.895
5.609
5.132
5.212
5.195
5.40£
5.300
5.359
5-35B
5.309
5.321
5.229
.459
.300
T1«Q
.424
,«59
..<«ai
.462
.491
,507
.550
.389
.194
.208
.755
T71S
.700
.634
.435
.531
.639
.5fll
.540
.495
.510
91.6
94.6
9?. 9
92.4
91.6
91.2
91.7
91.3
91.0
90.5
93.1
97.0
96.5
86.5
flfc.2
86.6
87.8
91.9
90.0
88.1
89., 1
89.8
90.7
.90.3.
AVERA6E5 24. 24. 24. 24.
I OF DAT* 100. 100. LOJL*. LOO^
MINIMUM 105. 5.195 .188 86.225
MAXIMUM 134. 6.229 .755 96.985
T
10
II
\Z
II
14
IB
X
21
12
2]
24
" J5
It
27
2.
31
31
' S3
>4 -
3»
. 2S
37
30
' 41
42
.495 90,924 _ 48
9TO.OEV. 10. .241 .143 2.787 '"I
I 8TO.OEV. a. 4.177 2t.«7« 3.065
24-HOUR REMOVAL EFICIENCY USING "
1
?HEANJ E_ i E t 91,00dt "*
1 IN OUT
NOTE: IMEAN) IS DEFINED AS:
X
THE ME.AN FOR X (JAYS USING Y-HOUH AVtKAGtS
07
aa
-------
DAILY SUMMAKV OF RESULTS
LOCATION: RICKENSACKEK AFH 19(
DATE! 3- 7-60
TIME
0
100
y ..l?«ft_
1 1600
0 1900
01 2oaa
2100
2200
2300
9 AVERA6ES
I OF DATA
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MEAJL
3TD.DEV.
X STO.DEV.
LOAD
92.
92.
92.
92.
92.
90.
90.
90.
l?°.
120.
127.
125.
122.
122.
u*.
lie.
105.
lUJ^
100.
99.
»7r
96.
94.
... -?-5A
24.
100,
90.
127.
104.
13.
13.
E E
IN
5.371"
5.697
5i5»l
5.376
5.334
.. 5.540
5.644
5.790
5.fr*a
5.791
5.691
5..36V
4.938
4.616
aTfci«
4.507
4.276
.. .1.070 .
4.055
4.014
4.0*4
OUT
.455
.576
.571
.624
.511
.636
.563
.500
-^fc&O.
.526
.545
.621
.465
.205
*L93
.160
.093
.133
.063
.074
.077
3.959 .050
3.945 .005
_ 1,93ft .Vb6
24. 24.
100. 100.
3.936
5.791
4.916
.720
14.6«1 66
.050
.636
^150.
.233
.621
24-HOUR REMOVAL EFICIENCr USING
1
EFF
7
. _ _. . . .. .
91.5
69.9
-«9,J-
06.4
24.
LfiO,. ______
66.402
96.741
3.959
91
32
4.236
E i.E ?
1 IN OUT
JT
NOTE: IMEANJ is DEFINED AS:
i
THE M£AN FOR I OATS US!NG Y-HUUK AVfWAG£S
L...
II
S«
87
-------
DAILY SUMMARY OF RESULTS
LOCATIONS RICKENBACKER AFH 1980
OATEI 3- 8-8o
TIME
LOAD
IN
0
too
200
89.
82.
4.059
4.17*
OUT
.066
.076
300
400
500
60 0
700
82.
89a
89.
89.
3.944
3.970
«*««»
«*«*»
EFF
98.4
98.2
... 98»5_
«»«**
*»«**
900
1000
itoo
1200
1300
i«OQ
122.
122.
4.275 *»»»»» *«»»«
4.566 ***«* 00*0*
4,731 Minim * ___ MHMtM-
4.747 «««* »»»0*
4.834 »*«* «»«*«
126.
119.
1SOO
1600
115.
104.
4.969 000000
4.845 000000 0*000
JUAfcS tMMMtM IUI«JfJL
5.168 .067 98.7
1800
1900
2000
.
106.
108.
109.
5.168
5,028
4.943
4.765
4.628
.026
"33
.141
.221
99.5
99. 3_
97.1
95.4
2100
2200
2300._
* AVERAGES
1 OF DATA
111.
112.
4.584
4.444
.296
24. 24.
100. IOQT
12.
93.5
94.4
12.
JUU _______ 50»_..
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
HE AN
STO.OEV.
X STO.DEW.
82. 3.944 .026 93.498
126. 5.168 .298 99.502
.105, m.592. fgjioiL attune
15. .387 *«*««* *»*HHM
15. 6*438 »««» »»»»*»
24-HOuR REMOVAL EFICIENCY USING
t
[MEAN! 6 i__E
1 IN OUT
NOTES [MEAN) IS DEFINED ASS
X
THE MEAN f.0.8 X. D*I5 USING Y-HOUH AVERAGES
12
23
24
" 23
20
27
26
31
32
42
43
46
47
46
DO
5»
62
3
66
67
69
70
74
79
-------
DAILY SUMMARY OF RESULTS
LOCATION! R1CKENBACKER
OATEI 3- 9-80
TIME
0
100
20A
300
400
500.
600
700
00
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
^ 1199
1 1800
0 1900
-o aooo
2100
2200
iJOJL _ .
0 AVCRA6E8
X Or DATA
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MEAN
STO.OEV.
X STO.DEV.
24-HOUR REMOVAL
1
[MIAMI E f E
1 IN
r
LOAD E
IN
110. .415
118. .448
125. .790
122. .918
110. .769
120. .626
118. .786
119. 5.059
120. 5.188
UJ. 5.296
124. 5.165
124. 5.283
111. «TP«fc
110. 5.202
103. 5.115
98. .886
103. .862
107. .644
104. .615
105. 4.637
24. 24.
100, 100.
98. 4.425
126. 5.29b
114. 4.880
». .272
8. 5.972
AFB I960
E
OUT
.252
.198
.287
.221
.190
.192
000000
00000
008000
000000
.264
.230
.133
000000
000000
000000
000000
ttttttt
10.
4ST
.133
.287
000000
000000
000000
EFICIENCY USIN6
OUT
NOTE! (MEAN) IS DEFINED AS:
X
THE MEAN fan x. CAYS USJN
,
t
,i
i.
:i
V "' 1 V
EFF
94.3
95.6
94.0
95.5
95.9
95.9
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
94.9
95.5
97.4
00000
00000
00000
00000
00000
10.
93.915
97.356
000000
000000
000000
""" 1
27
28
t*
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
4O
41
42
43
44
45
4C
47
48
49
5O
91
52
83
94
95
96
57
98
BO
eo
61
62
63
64
69
66
67
66
69
7O
71
72
73
74
75
-------
DAILY SUMMARY
OF RESULTS
LOCATION! RICKENBACKEK AFB i9«o
DATE: 3-10-00
TIME LOAD
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
00
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
a> ±700
i laoo
-J 1900
00 2000
2100
2200
2300
* AVERAGES
X OF DAT*
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MEAN
9TD.DEV.
X STD.OEV.
24-HOUR REMOVAL
1
(MEAN) E e E
1 IN
116.
118.
_iet»_
125.
122.
lie..
120.
lie.
117,
114.
in.
92,
92.
92.
96.
96.
96.
. 97..
97.
99.
97-
96.
100.
24.
100-
92.
126.
12.
11.
E
IN
.565
.600
.521
.506
.572
«. 70»
5.017
5.049
S.Ob!
5.275
5. 046
4*303
4.334
4.257
4.307
4.204
.4.210
4. 256
4.266
4.407
4.529
4.657
4,631
24.
100.
4.204
5.275
4,581
.310
6.765
E
OUT
000000
******
000000
0*0000
******
.052
.066
.111
.079
.074
.077
.077
.075
!o79
.119
.256
.303
15.
h3.
.052
.362
00000ft
******
******
EFICIENCV USING
: 000000X
OUT
tFF
00000
00000
00000
0*000
00000
99.0
98.7
97.6
98.2
96.3
98.2
98.2
97.8
96.1
97.2
95,7
94.4
93.5
92.2
15.
63,
92.190
99.021
000***
******
NOTEt (MEAN] IS DEFINED AS:
X
THE MEAN FOR X UAYS USING Y-HUUH AVt«AGtS .
2
3
4
B
7
10
tl
12
13
14
IB
IB
17
IB
IB
20
21
22
23
24
29
2.
27
2B
t*
3O
31
32
33
34
39
37
M
3»
40
41
42
43
44
49
4«
47
48
40
90
91
92
93
94
99
96
87
90
9fi
60
ei
63
61
0a
C7
«a
a«
7O
71
72
73
74
79
-------
DAILY SUMMAHV OF RESULTS
LOCATION! RICKENBACKER AFH 1980
OATEI 3-ii-eo
TIME
0
too
20A
300
400
50fl
600
700
AOO
900
1000
Il«0
1200
1300
1400
1SOO
1600
_> 1700 _
i laoo
0 1900
vo 2000
2100
2200
2300
« AVERA6ES
X OF DATA
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MEAN
STD.DEV.
X STO.DEV.
24-HOUR REMOVAL
1
WIM1_ ._E... «_J
1 IN
Y
LOAD E E
IN OUT
75. .682 .368
75. .69* .429
7«. .* .«?
75. .704 .409
80. .763 .264
fltU 4.B5U .156
80. 5.043 .124
80. 5.002 **
1". *.??* MUM HUM
115. 5.399 *»»«*
114. 5.199 «*«««0
. ll.S*_. .5..U69 ,bl<»
131. 5.184 .224
127. S.329 .122
1J1T *-,»* ,^«»
131. 5.249 .186
113. ***«« «*««*«
110. »*»«* »*»»»
112. 4.991 »**«*
US. 5*465 *«***«
11*.. .«.1>4 ««
113. 4.993 **»**
109. 4.854 *«««««
110. 4.670 ******
24. 22. 12.
100. *2. 10.
75. 4,b70 .122
131. 5.465 .514
104. 5.026 ******
20. .259 MM**
19. 5.145 ******
EFICIENCY USIN6
J **M«»X
OUT
CFF
92.1
90.9
9i.0 ' ; '
91.3
94.5
96-8
97.5
*****
IfffUffl
*»**»
*****
«9.9
95.7
97.7
M.f
96.5
»**»*
*****
***»*
*****
MM MUM
*****
*****
*****
12.
50T
89.865
97.716
******
******
****** , ...
NOTEI tMEANJ IS DEFINED ASl
X
[HE pit«ri ruR » DAYS iiSiriS T = KUuii AVERAGES
*
>
t
r^
2
3
4
8
7
10
II
12
11
14
IB
18
IT
l>
l»
20
21
22
U
24
29
2B
27
28
S>
JO
31
32
S3
34
33
M
37
38
38
4O
41
42
43
44
49
48
47
48
4*
SO
Bl
82
B3
B4
BB
B8
B7
B8
BB
8O
81
82
83
84
03
68
B7
68
60
7O
71
72
73
74
7B
V
-------
DAILY SUMMARY OF RESULTS
LOCATION: RICKENBACKER AFB 1900
DATE! 3-12-00
TIME
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
TOO
00
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
^1000
02000
2100
2200
2300
AVERAGES
X OF DATA
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
3TD.OEV.
X STD.OEV.
LOAD E E
IN OUT
106. MMMMMM MMMMMM
106. ****** MMMMMM
106. MMMM.MM HIM* MM
106. MMMMMM MMMUMM
106. MMMMMM MMMMMH
.1U4. HMMMMM MMMMMM
106. MMMMMM MMMMMM
106. ****** MMMMMM
12S- 4»-40fc MMMMMM
137. 3.540 MMMUMM
142. 4.267 MMMMMM
142,_ 4,282. MMMMMff
132. 4.551 IMMUMM
132. MMMMMM MMMMMM
122T MMMMMM MMMMMM
I27. MMMMMM MMMMMM
136. MMMMMM MMMMMM
I36. .....5.2.14 MMMMMM
129. 5.670 MMMMMM
122. 5.926 MMMMMM
123. S.TTfc MMMMMM
125. 5.734 «*««««
129. 5. 041 MMMMMM
124. 5.093 MMMUMM
24. 12. 0.
100. SO. 0.
106. 2.506 MMMMMM
142. 5.926 .UOO
13. MMMMMM MMMMMM
11. ****** ******
EFF
««««*
MUM MM
MMMMM
MMMMM
#/»»»»
««««*
««««*
Htttttt*
MMMMM
MMMMM
MM***
MMMMM
MMMM*
MaMMM
MOHMM
MMMMM
MMMM*
MMMM*
MHMMM
0.
0.
MMMMMtt
.000
«MMM*M
******
******
24-HOUR REMOVAL EFICIENCV USING
1
(MEAN1 E E I .OOOX
1 IN
NOTE! (MEAN1
X
THE MEAN
OUT
IS DEFINED AS!
FQR X DAYS USING Y-HUl
i
2
3
4
a
7
a
10
1 1
11
14
ia
16
17
IS
IB
20
21
22
23
24
26
27
26
10
31
32
33
14
3B
36
37
4O
41
42
43
44
49
46
47
46
40
90
91
92
63
84
69
B6
37
aa
aa
60
61
62
63
64
83
66
67
68
68
7O
71
72
73
74
7B
-------
DAILY SUMMARY OF RESULTS
LOCATIONS RICKENBACKER
DATES 3-13-60
TIME
0
100
aaa
300
, 400
i 500
', 600
i 700
COO
900
1000
.._. 1100
1200
1300
I can
1500
1600
^1-7 9 9
flBOO
001900
Maaaa
2100
2200
2300
* AVERA6C8
X OF DATA
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MEAN
STD.DEV.
* STD.DEV.
LOAD E
IN
106. 5.699
106. 5.696
10«. S.lfl*
108. 4.906
106. 4.645
106. 1.280
108. 4.306
108. 4.606
111. «,««fl
129. 4.481
125. 4.823
127. #»#»#»
128. 5.082
128. 5.011
IPI , V . « <
116. 5.097
120. 5.017
120. «,97U
123. 5.035
123. 4.949
121. ft.AT*
130. 4.975
131. 4.936
JL1 !.._.. 4. 9 9 9
24. 23.
ioar 9fc.
io6. 4.ae6
131. 5.696
120, 4.924
9. .355
8. 7.205
AFB I960
E
OUT
*«««
**«»«
««*#
*«***#
**0*0*
«««««
.231
.354
,*?^
.045
.128
*«».«»
.565
.574
. S^fl
.561
.5oe
.505
.461
.421
,SOfc
.505
.634
.549
17.
Jl.
.045
.634
«**»*«
*»*««
*«***
24-HOUR REMOVAL EFICIENCV USING
i
IMEAMJ.- t , i ? m»m
1 IN OUT
i _____ _ _._
NOTE! (MEAN)
X
THE ME*
IS DEFINED AS:
ft FOH Z USY8 'JS!r_G Y-M'J'JK
EFF
*0«*
«*«** ...
|i««#p ' ' '
»»«**
**«**
*««
94.6
92.3
9P.7
99.0
97.3
«0«0»
08.9
66.5
09.?
69.0
90.0
89.8
90.6
91.5
«9Tfc
69.6
87.1
S9.0
17.
»U
67.132
96.99b
*tt»»*M
*U*U»*
«*»«*
ftVERAGtS . __
pk
2
3
4
7
IO
11
12
13
14
IS
16
17
1*
10
20
21
22
23
24
29
26
27
16
1*
JO
31
32
33
34
39
36
37
J6
3.
4O
41
42
43
44
49
4«
47
46
4«
BO
Bl
92
B3
S4
53
96
97
50
BO
60
61
62
63
A4
65
66
67
68
69
7O
71
72
73
74
73
'V
-------
DART SUMMARY OF RESULTS
LOCATION! RICKENBACKER
DATEI 3-14-80
TIME
0
too
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
fisoo
0)1900
(02000
2100
2200
2300
* AVERAGES
1 OF DATA
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
STO.OEV.
X STO.OEV.
LOAD E
IN
109. 5.074
109. »««*«*
J09. ««««««
109. »*»«**
109. «*«««
. 109. .. »****»
109. »»***
109. «*««»
111. MMMMMM
141. *««««»
139. *«*««*
134, 5.J60
132. 5.219
132. 5.160
130- S.2S7
130. 5.160
112. 5.149
111... . 4.._??U
111. 5.095
109. 5.177
110. 5.|fc2
112. 5.233
134. 5.234
114. 5.254
24. 14.
109. 4.990
141. 5.360
13. *»**f»
11. «****
AFB 1900
OUT
.692
.570
.373
.354
.41V
.336
.256
.339
.370
.501
.355
.247
.103
.155
.147
.142
.1 1*
.117
.064
.100
24.
on.
.064
.692
.309
.163
«.704
EFF
06.4
«»«*
«*««
***»
*««»«
«»»**
«»»**
**»»*
90.1
90.4
93.1
95.2
96.4
96.9
97.1
97.2
97.7
97.0
90.0
97.9
14.
06.361
90.702
««««««
*«««»*
24-HOUR REMOVAL EFICIENQY USIN6
1
IMEANl.. fc i...E l.ft**MX . . . . -
1 IN OUT
Y
NOTE! IMEANI
X
THE MEAN
IS DEFINED AS:
FOR X PAYS USING Y-HUUK
AVEPAGtS
3
4
6
7
10
II
12
13
14
16
17
I*
2O
21
22
23
24
23
26
27
28
a
3O
32
33
34
35
37
36
3*
4O
41
42
43
44
43
46
47
46
4«
SO
81
82
83
84
93
96
37
88
BB
6O
61
62
63
4
63
66
67
6
O
1
2
3
4
3
V
-------
DAILY SUMMARY OF RESULTS
LOCATION! RICKEN8ACKEH AFU I960
OATEI 3-15-80
TIME
0
100
»OA
300
400
500
600
700
no
400
1000
11«0
1200
1300
taOO
1SOO
1600
I IB ft. -
> 1800
0)»'»0
oj Aoao
2100
2200
2300
* AVCRACCS
X OF OAT*
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MEAN
STO.OEV.
X STO.DEV.
24-HOUR REMOVA
1
:. iMEANi g ,
1 IN
1_
NOTE: (MEAN)
X
THE MtAN
i
'
1
LOAD E E
IN
109. 5.251
104. 5.336
io«, ^.i**
113. 5.161
113. 5.020 1
111. b.017 i
112. .474
112. .457
f J1 . .Iff
121. .263
127. .195
12.7- ,.957
123. .907
123. .esi
IPO. ,01«
120. 5.106
90. 5.215
.-.JW.. .5*18^
87. 5.293
90. 5.355
«1T «.2At>
88. 5.234 1
86. 5.221
01.. 5*12J»
24. 24. 24
too, too. too
86. 4.881
127. 5.382 2
107. 5.147
15. .151
14. 2.926 76
L EFICIENCV USING
E : 86,0473
OUT
IS DEFINED A3:
FOH X DAYS USING
OUT
.211
.240
.'99
.778
.929
.350
.772
.363
.9*7
.401
.386
.302
.186
.132
.3*2
.635
.744
.434
.710
.766
.Q^O
.014
.989
.B9b
Cl32
.358
^iifl7_
.527
.731
tFF
96.0
94.6
«0.7
84.9
61 .6
53. D
B4.5
92.6
«*.*
92.4
92.6
93^9
96.2
97.3
as. A
87.6
»5.7
08.2
86.6
85.7
A?
80.6
01. 1
02. 5
24.
100.
53.005
97.290
0b.b38
10.466
12.081
Y-HUUK AVtMAGts .._.._.
^
ZA
t*
30
JJ
34
35
36
37
M
3*
4O
41
42
43
44
49
46
47
46
46
SO
91
92
S3
94
99
ee
57
58
BO
60
61
62
63
A4
t*
06
6?
::
7O
71
72
"*J
74
79
V
-------
DAILY SUMMARY OF RESULTS
LOCATION! RICKENBACKEH AFB 1980
DATE! 3-16-80
TIME LOAD E t
IN OUT
0 101. 5.043 .831
tOO 109. 5.143 1.117
200 109. «,PAO l.UOO
300 98. 5.407 .717
400 101. 5.261 .762
_.... 500 103. 5..2JJ .637
600 103. 5.184 .459
700 103. 5.225 .525
ADA 104. S,PIS Tin«
900 105. 5.20U .374
1000 105. 5.294 .399
,1100 103. 5. £45 .ill
1200 103. 5.255 .385
1300 104. 5.284 .259
1400 106,. 5.24% -&41
1500 106. 5.145 .080
1600 90. 5.180 .863
^ HP? .89»__ 5^280 ,689
f 1800 88. 5.280 .852
00 fOO 92. 5.325 .948
its. 2000 90. 5.225 1.059
2100 89. 5.170 .930
2200 89. 5.125 .306
2300 90t 5^137 ,190
AVERAGES 24. 24. 24.
Z OF DATA 100. 100. 100,.
MINIMUM 88. 5.093 .190
MAXIMUM 109. 5.407 1.117
MEAN 99, 5^227 ^6.49
STO.DEV. 7. .072 .287
X 8TO.OEV. 7. 1,387 44.i49
24-HOUR REMOVAL EFICIENCY U3ING
1
fMEANJ _t j E ' 87.59Q?
1 IN OUT
EFF
83.7
78.3
I9,JL
86.7
05.6
B7.8 .
91.1
89.9
-94^1. ....._.....
92.8
92.5
94.0
92.7
95.1
8*>,a
82.9
83.3
67.0
83.9
62.2
Orl
62.0
94.0
96.3
24.
100T
78.289
96.296
87.591
5.506
6.287
NOTEt IMEAN) IS DEFINED AS:
X
THE MfcAN FOR X DAYS USING Y-HUUR AVERAGES
[^
2
3
4
a
6
7
to
1 1
17
13
14
IB
It
17
IB
1*
20
21
22
21
24
23
26
27
26
X»
3O
31
32
33
34
39
3«
37
38
30
4O
41
41
43
44
43
46
47
46
4»
BO
Bl
B2
B3
B4
BB
B6
07
B6
B«
BO
Bl
B2
63
64
63
66
67
68
BO
70
71
72
73
74
78
V
-------
DAILY SUMMARY OF RESULTS
LOCATION: RICKENBACKER AFB i960
DATE: 3-i7-eo
TIME
0
100
300
400
_._. 500
600
700
1 MOO
900
1000
HOP
1200
1300
1100
1500
1600
>i7go
1 1800
001900
^2000
2100
2200
2300
AVERAGES
I OF OAT*
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MEAN
: STO.DEV.
* STD.DEV.
24-HOUR REMUV
1
WE.MH-. E .
1 IN
NOTE: (MEAN)
X
LOAD E E EFF
IN OUT
90. 5.011 .209 95.8
94. 5.113 ^ .502 90.2
98. 5.168 .996 80.7
99. 5.111 1.036 79.7
9fl. 5.086 1.004 80. 3
100. 5.345 1.170 78.1
100. 5.386 1.024 81.0
106. 5.265 .569 89.2
100. 4.922 .327 93.4
. 100. 4.716 .182 96.1
99. 4.967 .249 95.0
93. 5.185 .213 95.9
«*. *.*' .'17 #*.*
91. 5.067 2.323 54.2
95. .832 .767 84.1
91. .643 .239 94,9
92. .385 .173 96.0
93. .461 .226 94.9
96. .562 .730 84.0
92. .583 .569 67.6
93. ,502 .309 93.1
24. 24. 24. 24.
100, 100, 100. |00T *
90. 4.385 .173 54.159
106. 5.386 2.323 96.143
96. 4.935 .661 86.840
4. .316 .485 9.337
5. 6.408 73.157 10.752
AL EFICItNCV USIN6
OUT
IS DEFINED AS:
M FOR x DAYS i/i>iNG I-MUUK AVtKAGta
.
24
29
27
X»
SO
31
32
M
39
36
37
M
4O
41
43
44
49
4O
47
»B
40
SO
SI
92
S3
94
93
96
97
96
99
6O
61
62
63
A4
65
66
67
6
9
O
1
2
4
9
V
-------
DAILY SUMMARY OF RESULTS
LOCATION: RICKENBACKER AFB i960
DATEI 3-18-80
TIME LOAD E E
IN OUT
0 72. 4.481 .222
100 72. 4.439 .173
200 72. 4.176 ,«47
300 72. 4.379 .540
400 72. 4.421 .170
500 . ... _ 72, . 4,566 . ,11V
600 72. 4.631 .039
700 72. 4.825 .110
BOO 77. 4. 598 ,291
900 82. 4.673 .263
1000 82. 4.756 .272
1100 82. 5.048 .300
1200 82. 4.965 .239
1300 74. 4.794 .136
1400 BO. 4.696 .332
1500 80. 4.664 .354
1600 95. 4.555 1.850
1 1800 93. 4.701 .141
001900 91. 4.470 .661
CT>2000 95. 4.428 ,119
2100 93. 4.600 .048
2200 94. 4.647 .144
2300 94. 4.738 ,ii3«
9 AVERAGES 24. 24. 24.
X OF DATA 100. 100. 100, 1
MINIMUM 72. 4.376 .039
MAXIMUM 95. 5.048 1.850
. *E_AN_ fig. 4,628 _,34.flL
9TD.OEV. 9. .174 .427
X 9TD.OEV. 11. 3.7*9 »«»««
24-HOUR REMOVAL EFICIENCV USING
1
(MEAN! E , E : 9(L.490t
1 IN OUT
Y
NOTE! (MEAN) IS DEFINED AS:
X
THE MEAN FOR x DAYS USING Y-HUUK
EFF
95.0
96.1
. 96,6. .
87.7
96.1
97.6
99.2
97.7
93.7
94.4
94.3
94.1
95.2
97.2
92.4
59.4
69.1
97.0
85.2
99.0
96.9
95.1
24.
00.
59.383
99.168
92.446
9.364
10.129
AVERAGtS - -
a
3
4
3
7
B
10
1 1
12
13
14
IB
16
17
1*
20
21
22
23
24
23
27
211
X*
JO
31
32
33
34
33
36
37
38
39
40
4t
42
43
44
43
46
47
48
4B
SO
91
83
B4
93
36
57
98
ae
6O
61
62
63
f.4
63
66
07
66
60
70
71
72
73
74
73
-------
DAILY SUMMARY OF RESULTS
r
20
31
21
23
»4
28
30
3)
32
33
34
39
36
37
38
3O
40
42
44
43
40
47
40
49
30
91
32
33
94
33
96
N
LOCATION: RICKENBACKEH AFB i9»o
DATEI 3-19-80
TIME
0
too
300
400
500
'600
700
DO
900
1000
HOP
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
'"f 1800
00 |900
"J aofta
2100
2200
2300
AVERA6E8
X OF DATA
MINIMUM
MAXIMUM
MEAN
STO.DEV.
X STO.OEV.
24-HOUR REMOVAL
1
(MEANJ £ , _E
1 IN
LOAD E fc
IN
76. 5.102 1
76. 5.124 2
76. 5.075
78. 4.970
76.. 4.836 .
76. 4.612
76. 4.769
100. 4.726
99. 4.535
...10.4..... 4.361
100. 4.327
99. 4.357
95, 4, 214
91. 4.077
99. 4.173
105." 4^123
105. 4.270
105. 4.255
105. 3.772
.Itt5.a.._... 1.398...
24. 24. 24
100. 100. 100
78. 3.598
105. 5.124 2
93. 4.462
12. .431
12. 9.614 96
EFICIENCY USIN6
1 90,165?
OUT
NOTE! IMEAN) IS DEFINED AS*
X
THE MEAN FOR X DATS USittG
OUT
.041
.009
.513
.529
^256
.250
.705
.760
.505
.367
.246
.191
.117
.096
.068
.090
.141
.471
.136
.1.11
.066
.009
*M1_
.425
.396
V nut
EFF
79.6
60.6
64 0 ' " * '.
09.9
»9.4
S2.8
94.7
94.6
05.1
63.2
06. 4
91.1
94.3
QS.S
97.1
97.6
9B.4
97.6
96.7
MT.I
68.9
96.4
96.7
24.
100.
60.801
96.353
90.632
6.251
9.104
'« AVERAGES
- -
n
3
4
0
7
to
1 1
13
14
17
10
20
21
22
23
24
23
20
26
2*
30
32
33
34
39
37
Sfl
4O
4f
42
43
44
49
4
47
40
40
9O
Bl
02
03
04
93
00
97
90
BO
00
ot
02
03
64
63
0«
07
OS
oo
70
71
72
74
79
V
-------
17 OPERATING OATS
SUMMAWY OF HESUL.TS
USING 1-HOUH AVERAGES
tQEATItlNl BICKENBACKEH AFH 19KQ
DATE« 3- 2-80
*
LOAD ... E E tFF
IN OUT
» AVERAGES 406. 361. 261. 237.
X OF DATA 100. 93. 64. 58.
MINIMUM /«.. J..596 ,«39 53.005 .
MAXIMUM 145. 6.229 2.356 99.166
MEAN loa. «.965 .467 90.541
IT.
X STO.DEV. 15. 6.410 72.894 7.596
23
SO-BAY REMOVAL IFICIENCY USING 41
i - «
INEANI E . E I 9Q.567X "
10 til OUT [*
Y
.NQTE_L..LMEANJ _.IS_JBfEINIUL AS:
L THE MEAN FOR X OATS USING V-HOUR AVERAGES
M
to
. 5?
03
94
-------
17 OPERATING DAYS
SUMMAKY OF RESULTS
'. USING
.- DATE*
_-. . DATE
^ : 1. i»-*0
3- 3-60
3- 4-60
J- 5r»0 .
J. 6-60
3- 7-60
1. M.AO
3- 9-80
3-1U-60
.._ _ 3-ii-eo
3-13-60
3-14-60
1-lS-ltO
3-16-60
3-17-80
. > 3rie-eo . .
m s-i»-eo
vo
AWtBACE*.
i OF DATA
MINIMUM
MAX IMU_M__
MEAN
8TD.DEV.
1 1TD-DCV.
24-HOUR AVERAGES
3- 2-80
LOAD. £_ . . £
IN OUT
125. 5.259 .462
110. 4.966 .300
1U2... i,2dl .430
116. 5.502 .495
104. 4.916 .350
114. 4.08U *t>»nutt
107. 4.581 **«0«*
104. 5.U26 00*000
120. 4.924 *«0000
119. 00«0«0 .309
107, S.14T .fc/17
99. 5.227 .649
96. 4.935 .661
.. 0-2. 4.ti2a .346
93. 4.482 .441
17, Ifc- 11T
55. 52. 35.
82. 4.482 .308
IIP, i.SPi. ,b87
106. 4.965 .467
12. .287 .141
11_ 5-T«S SD.PfcS
EFF
91.3
93.8
91.9
90.9
93.4
00000
00000
67.6
66.6
92.4
90.6
ID.
32.
86.638
93.790
90.551
2.640
P-91fc
30-DAY REMOVAL EFICIENCV USING
24
(MEAN] E ,
30 IN
Y
NOTE! (MEANJ
i - *
THE MEAN
!
:
E I 90.5891
OUT
IS DEFINED AS:
FON X DAYS USING Y-HUUK AVERAGES
- -
33
aa
30
41
41
43
44
49
40
47
48
40
SO
81
ni
04
59
se
97
90
90
eo
«i
02
83
67
an
70
71
t2
74
79
-------
FKEUUENCY DISTRIBUTION
~"~ LOCATION: RICKENBACKEK AFB i9eo
STARTING OATEt 3- 2-80
PARAMETER! 1-MOUH EIN. LH/MMRTU
PARAMETER. RANGE .....
3.000 - 3.400
3.400 - 3.800
3.800 - 4.200
4.200 - 4.600
4,600 - 5,000
5.000 - 5.400
5.400 - 5.800
5.800 » 6.200
6.200 - 6.600
6.600 - 7.000
OCCURRENCE
. FHEBUENCI PEHCtNUGE
0. 0.
17.
58.
*"».
187.
42.
4.
1.
0.
4.
14.
46.
10.
0.
0.
J
HISTOGRAM
*
***
»«» *********
A*********************
*****
BEYOND NIN/MAX RAN6E 1.
TOTAL POPULATION 407.
f CUMULATIVE
vQ
O LOCATION!
DATE! 3-
PARAMETER:
PARAMETER RANGE
.000 - 3.400
.000 - 3.800
005 - 4.200
.000 - 4.600
.000 5.000
.000 5.400
.000 - 5.800
.000 - 6.200
3,000 - 6.600
DISTRIBUTION
RfCKFMBACKFfl APR I9AO
2-80
I-MUUR EIN,
LB/MMBTU
OCCURRENCE
FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
0.
3.
29.
78.
172.
401.
405.
406.
3.000 - 7.000 406.
BEYOND NIN/MAX RANBE 1.
TOTAL POPULATION
407.
..
0.
1
5. .
19.
42.
99.
100.
190.
100.
HISTOGRAM
*
**
A****************** ' ...
A************************************************
A************************************************
ft************************************************
a*************************************************
s
2
20
21
22
23
24
29
28
27
2B
3O
31
32
33
34
38
38
37
30
4O
41
42
43
44
49
49
47
48
40
90
91
92
93
84
89
99
87
88
8>
9O
1
91
69
97
99
99
70
71
72
73
74
79
V
-------
FKtUUtNCY DISTRIBUTION
LOCATION: RICKENBACKEH
STARTING OATEI 3- 2-80
PABAUFTfBI t
-------
FREUUENCY DISTRIBUTION
LOCATIONS RICKENBACKEH
STAHTING DATE! 3- £-80
PARAMETER* 1-MQUH EOUT
AFU 1980
. LB/MMBTU . .
OCCURHEMCt
PARAMETER RANGE . FHEUUEJtCJL PEKCtNUtE
.010 - .159 57. 17.
»!*« - .*0« 87. PS.
.308 .457 75.
.457 - .606 64.
,60ft ..-.. .755 ... 26.
.755 - .104 14.
.904 - 1.053 11.
1,093 v 1.202 4,
i.eoa 1.351 o.
1.351 - 1.500 0.
BEYOND MIN/MAX RANGE 6.
TOTAL POPULATION 344.
i»
7 CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION
VO
^ LOCATIONl RICKEMMACKER
aa.
19.
8.
4.
3.
1 .
0.
0.
AFB 19HO
-i
HiSIObRAM
»***
*************
***********
*********
****
*
*
DATE: 3- 2-80
PARAMETER! 1-HOUR EOUT, LB/MMBTU
OCCURRENCE
PARAMETER RAN6E FREUUENCY PERCENTAGE
.010 - .159 57.
.010 .308 144.
.010 - ,457 319t
.010 .606 303.
.010 - .755 309.
.010 .904 323.
.010 - 1.053 334.
.010 - >.au£ 338.
,010 - 1,351 338.
.010 - 1.500 33B.
BEYOND MIN/MAK ftANfiE 6.
TOTAL POPULATION 344.
17.
M.
bH.
B2.
90.
94 T
97.
98.
98.
98.
HISTOGRAM
********
A********************
A*******************************
A****************************************
A*******************************************
*************************************«ft*t******
A************************************************
A*******************************************
A***********************************************
\
a
i
4
5
7
1O
11
12
13
14
10
1.
17
IS
10
10
21
22
23
24
23
26
2T
IB
I*
JO
31
32
33
34
38
36
37
30
30
4O
41
42
43
44
49
46
47
46
40
5O
91
92
83
84
99
96
87
86
90
6O
61
62
63
64
63
6
07
66
»»
70
71
72
73
74
78
V
-------
FHEUUENCY DISTRIBUTION
LOCATIONS RICKENBACKEH
STARTING DATES 3- 2-60
AB.UfTfBI f.UQUB LOG
AFb 1900
OCCURRENCE.
PARAMETER RANGE FHEUUENCT HFurnyit AC;F HISTOUHAM
2.000 - -1.762 0.
-1.564 - -1.346 3.
-1.346 - -1.128 13.
-1..L28 - -.910 ... 2J.
-.910 - -.692 36.
-.692 - -.474 79.
-.256 - -.038 53.
-.036 - .160 0.
0.
o
1.
it. **
11. ******
23. *****
15. *****
0.
BEYOND MIN/MAX RANGE 21.
TOTAL POPULATION 344.
f CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION
<£>
CO LOCATIONS RICKEMACKER
DATES 3- 2-80
PARAMETERS 1-HUUR LOG
AFH 19*0
EOUT
OCCURRENCE
PARAMETER RANGE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE HISTOGRAM
-2.000 - -1.762 0.
-2.000 - -1.564 1.
-2.000 - -1,346 4,
-2.000 - -1.126 17.
-2.000 - -.910 40.
-2.000 - -.692 76,
-2.000 - -.474 157.
-2.000 - -S256 270,
-2,000 - -.038 323.
-2.000 - .160 323.
BEYOND MIN/MAX RANGE PI.
TOTAL POPULATION 3*44.
i
i
0.
0.
1.
5. «
12. *
, 2'. ******
46. A**********************
78, «****«*************
94. A**********************************************,
94. A********************************************)**
r
i
I
2
3
4
8
7
IO
II
t2
13
14
II
1*
17
18
21
22
23
24
29
26
27
26
t»
SO
31
32
33
34
39
W
37
36
4O
41
42
43
44
49
46
47
48
40
80
81
92
83
84
99
86
97
98
60
60
61
62
63
A4
ee
67
ee
60
7O
71
71
73
74
79
V
-------
FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION
0
i
2
3
4
n
7
6
9
0
1
4
0
fl
7
»
0
1
2
3
14
9
16
7
8
9
to
1
2
3
4
3
6
7
a
0
JO
it
LOCATION: RICKENBACKEH AFB I9go
STARTING DATES 3* 2-00
PARAMFTfBl 1-HOUft 1 FFFICjFNrY
OCCURRENCt
PARAMETER RANtfE FRf.UUfcNCY PERCENTAGE HISTOGRAM
60.000 * 63.990 2,
61.990 * fc7.9AO 0,
67.960 - 71.970 1.
71.970 - 75.960 0.
75,960 - 79,9bO 6.
79.950 - 63.940 15.
B3.940 - 67.930 3a.
87.930 91.920 A4.
9l.9aO 95.910 115.
95.910 99.900 0.
BEYOND MIN/MAX RANGE 79.
TOTAL POPULATION 334.
Hjy
7 CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION
vO
*» LOCATIONI RICKENBAQKER
1.
o.
0.
0.
2. *
«.
10. **
?5. ***
34. «***«»«
0.
AFB 1980
DATE: 3- 2-ao
PARAMETER: I-HOUB x EFFICIENCY
OCCURRENCE
PARAMETER RANGE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE HISTOGRAM
60.000 63.990 2.
60.000 - 67.980 2.
60,000 - 71.970 3.
60.000 - 75.960 3.
60.000 79.9SO *.
60.000 AS. 940 24.
60.000 - 67.930 56.
60.000 - 91.930 140.
60,000 95,910 8S5.
60.000 - 99.900 2b5.
BEYOND MIN/MAX RANGE 79.
TOTAL POPULATION 334.
1.
1.
1.
1.
3.
7, ***
17. »»*»
42. A********************
76. ***«*»**«****»»*«
76. **************************************
-
2
J
14
A
A
a
3
4
6
7
9
10
12
13
14
IB
te
17
16
IB
2O
21
22
23
24
23
26
27
28
t»
30
31
32
33
34
33
36
37
30
39
4O
41
42
43
44
43
46
47
48
4ft
90
91
92
03
94
99
96
S7
96
90
6O
61
62
63
ru
63
66
67
ea
6ft
70
71
72
73
74
79
-------
FREUUENCV DISTRIBUTION
LOCATION: RICKENBACKEK
STAHTING DATE! 3- 2-80
tARAMFTFRI l«tHOUB LQ6(
AFB 19ttO
t FFFICIENrVl
OCCURRENCE
PARA.ME.IE.K RANGE FHEUIIEJUCJ . PERCENTAGE HISTOGRAM
.700 - .730 1.
.760 - .790 3.
.790 - .820 0.
.820. .-. .850 ...... 1. .
.890 - .880 0.
.880 - .910 12.
T4IO T«J«O \\ ,
.940 - 1.970 131.
.970 - 2.000 0.
0.
o.
t.
0.
0.
0.
4. *
4. *****
39. *************
0.
BEYOND MIN/MAX RANGE 154.
TOTAL POPULATION 33*.
, CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION
ID
tn LOCAT10M1 RICKEMACKEa
AFR 1480
DATE: 3- 2-so
PARAMETER! 1-HOUR LOG(X EFFICIENCY)
OCCURRENCE
PARAMETER RANGE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE HISTOGRAM
.700 - .730 1.
.700 - .760 2.
.700 - .790 5.
.700 - .820 5.
.700 - .850 6.
.700 - r««0 ft,.
.700 - .910 18.
.700 - .940 <|9.
1,700..- .?ZO. .. . 10Q.
1.700 - 2.000 180.
BEYOND MIN/MAK RANGE 1S4T
TOTAL POPULATION 334.
0.
1.
1.
1.
2.
5. *
IS. *
S
-------
FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION
LOCATION: RICKENBACKEK AFB i960
STARTING DATES 3- 2-80
PARAMFTER1 1-HOUR 100-X EFFlr.ItNCV
PARAMEJfR RANGE
.010 - 4.009
4.004 . ft. 00ft
e.ooa - 12.007
12.007 - 16.006
l*i.Q96 .-. £0.005.
20.00S - 24.004
24.004 28.003
2ft. 001 12.002
32.002 - 36.001
36.001 40.000
OCCURRENCE
FREUUENCT PERCENTAGE
74. 22.
114, 1«,
87.
32.
.15 a-
6.
0.
1.
0.
0.
26.
10.
«.
2.
0.
0T
0.
0.
HISTOGRAM
********
.. *. « t* * *.* * *.**
********«
*****
**
*
** . ' ...
BEYOND MIM/MAX RAN6E 5.
TOTAL POPULATION 334.
7 CUMULATIVE
CO
CT> LOCATION!
DATEl 3-
PARAMETERJ
PARAMETER RANGE
.010 4.009
.010 - 8.008
,010 - 12,007
.010 - 16.006
.010 20.005
.010 24.004
.010 - 28.003
.010 - 32.002
.010 - 36.001
.010 - 40.000
BEYOND. tUN/_MJx_JtAM
TOTAL POPULATION
DISTRIBUTION
ICKEMBACKeB
AFB 14AO
2-80
1-HOUR 100-X EFFICIENCY
OCCURRENCE
FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
74.
188.
275.
307.
32*,
12ft.
328.
329.
329,
329.
6E_. 5..
334.
22.
56.
82.
92.
. *' . 96.
9A.
98.
99.
99,
99.
HISTOGRAM
*******
A***************************
A*********************.*******************
A************
A********
_**.**i*t ******
*********
*************
*************
.A*******************************
****************************
# « * * * 1 1 * . * n t » * t ! * * * « ....
a***********************************
.A*********************************
A**********************************
A************************************************
i^
20
21
22
23
24
23
2«
27
28
t»
10
31
32
13
34
3B
*4
37
31
3*
*O
41
42
43
44
49
4«
47
4B
4P
9O
91
92
93
84
99
9Q
S7
90
90
0
61
.2
63
f>4
A3
ee
O7
ea
ee
70
71
72
73
74
73
V
-------
FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION
LOCATION! RICKENBACKER AFB I960
STARTING DATE! 3- 2-80
...... »>*BAM£Tf»i i. unite mcfian.* ccctr icur v i
... PARAMETER RANBE
£.000 -1.640
-1.280 - -.9i>0
-.920 - -.560
-TS60 - -.200
-.200 - .160
.160 .520
.880 1.240
1.240 - 1.600
OCCURRENCE
FHFUUtNCY HFHCFUT.C-E M1STO«B»M
2V>-'. :- #
0.
0.
.. _. 1....
9.
135.
0.
0.
Oj " ' ' ' '
0.
0.
.. 0.
3.
14. *»
40. **»***«»***
0.
BEYOND MIN/MAK RANGE 22.
TOTAL POPULATION 334.
1 CUMULATIVE
vO
DATE! 3-
PARAMETERS
PARAMETER RANGE
-2.000 - -1.640
-2.000 - -1.200
-2.000 -.920
-2.000 - -.560
-2.000 - -.200
DISTRIBUTION
2-80
1-HOUR LOGC100-S
EFFICIENCY)
OCCURRENCE
FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE HISTOGRAM
0.
0.
0.
0.
i.
-2.000 - .520 57.
=2.000 » .880 177.
_-2tOp.O. .-. . 1..240 _ 312. .
-2.000 - 1.600 312.
AEVOMfk MtN/HAK RiftC* 22.
TOTAL POPULATION
it
)
s
T .
334.
0.
0.
0.
0.
3*
|7. ****«**
53. -****»««««*»»»»***««««**«
93. *********«***»**«
-
f\
»
28
27
in
t*
JO
33
34
38
37
38
38
4O
41
42
49
44
48
48
47
48
48
9O
81
82
83
84
99
98
97
98
OB
eo
81
82
83
fU
8
8
8
8
6
79
V
-------
FREUUENCY DISTRIBUTION
LOCATION! RICKENBACKEK
STARTING DATES 3- 2-ttO
PARAMETER! 21-HOUH EIN.
AFB 1900
Ltt/MMHTU
OCCURRENCE
PARAMETER RANGE FREQUENCY PEKCtNlAGE HISTOGRAM
3.000 - 3.400 0.
1.400 - J.,800 0,
3.800 - 4.200 0.
4.200 - 4.600 3.
4,600 - 5.000 6.
5.000 5.400 6.
5.400 - 5.800 1.
5.800 - 6.200 0.
6.200 - 6.600 0.
6.600 - 7.000 0.
BEYOND MIN/MAX RANGE 0.
TOTAL POPULATION 16.
*to
1 CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION
vO
0° LOCATION! RICKENRACKEa
DATE! 3- 2-80
PARAMETER! 24-HOUR EIN,
0.
0.
0.
19. *********
30. *******************
38. *********»*«**
6. **
0.
0.
0.
AFB 1980
LB/MMBTU
OCCURRENCE
PARAMETER RANGE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE HISTOGRAM
.000 - 3.400 0.
.000 3.800 0.
tOOO 4,200 0.,
.000 " 4.600 3.
.000 - 5.000 9,
.000 5.400 IS.
.000 - 5.800 16.
.000 - 6.200 16.
3.000 - 6,600 16,
3.000 - 7.000 16.
BEYOND M1N/MA1 RAJUUL 0.
TUTAL POPULATION 16.
0.
0.
0,
19. **«****
56. is************************** . ., - .
44. ****************************
100. A****************.********************************
100. ***»»*****«*«*«***************»****
100, *********** A**************************************
100. ********»»***»»******»**************
. .
.
1
20
2!
22
23
24
23
26
27
t*
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
36
4O
41
42
44
43
46
47
4B
4»
30
51
52
63
54
33
36
37
38
SB
60
61
62
63
63
66
C7
68
ee
7O
72
3
4
3
A
-------
FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION
LOCATION! R1CKENBACKEH
STARTING DATEl 3- 2-00
PARAMETER RANGE
.500 - .535
.*« . -*TO
.570 - .605
.60S - .640
. ..6.4.0 ..- . ...675
.675 - .710
.710 - .745
-I« TT«0
.700 - .015
.815 - .050
AFU 1900
flu
OCCURRENCE
FKEUUENCT ... PERCENTAGE
:
0.
o.
«.. .
7.
5.
A.
0.
0.
°»
0.
0.
25.
44.
31.
o.
o.
o.
HISTOGRAM
ftftfi**********
***********
******
BEYOND MIN/MAX RANGE 0.
TOTAL POPULATION 16.
7 CUMULATIVE
v£>
vo i nr*Tt nut
DATE: 3-
PARAMETER:
PARAMETER RANGE
.500 .535
.500 .570
*5J>0 - _.605
.500 .640
.500 - .675
.500 .710
.500 - .745
.500 - .700
.500 - ,815
.500 - .850
EVONO HIM/MAX BAM
TOTAL POPULATION
DISTRIBUTION
2-80
24-HOUH LOG
AFH fQAO
EIN
OCCURRENCE
FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
0.
0.
9.
0.
«.
11.
16.
16.
16.
IfiE 0,
16.
0.
0.
0.
0.
25.
too.
100.
100.
100.
HISTOGRAM
*************
*******
A*************************************************
o************************************************
*«******»***»»*****«*************************
A***********************************************
'
1 i
2
3
4
a
7
1O
11
It
13
14
IB
17
It
18
TO
21
22
23
24
29
30
31
32
33
34
39
37
30
4O
41
42
43
44
49
48
47
48
40
90
9t
92
83
84
89
88
87
88
80
eo
61
«2
63
64
66
67
ee
eo
7O
71
72
73
74
78
-------
FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION
LOCATION; RICKENBACKER AFB I9eo
STARTING DATE! 3- 2-80
PARAMETERS 24-HOUR EOUT. LR/MMHTU
OCCURRENCE
PARAMETER RANGE FREQUENCY PEHCtNTAUE HISTOGRAM
.010 - .159 0,
.159. ,30« 0T
.306 - .457 6.
.«S7 - .606 2.
«*0fc - .755 _lm
.755 - .900 0.
.904 - 1.053 0.
1.051 - 1.202 0,
1.202 - 1.351 0.
1.351 - 1.500 0.
0.
DT
55. *»«***»****«
16. ******
27. ********«*«*«
0.
0.
QT
0.
0.
BEYOND MIN/MAX RAN6E 0.
TOTAL POPULATION 11.
It*
7 CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION
H
? LOCATION! RICKFMftACHFH
w DATEJ 3- 2-80
PARAMETER: 24-HOUR EOUT
AFB |Q*0
, LB/MMBTU
OCCURRENCE
PARAMETER RANGE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE HISTOGRAM
.010 - .159 0.
.010 - .308 0.
. ,OJO.- .... .45,7 .. 6.
.010 .606 8.
.010 .755 11.
.010 - T904 11.
.010 - 1.053 11.
.010 - 1.202 11.
_ .010 - 1.351 11.
.010 - 1.500 11.
I
r BEYDJttt HIM/MAX ftAMfi£__ 0._
TOTAL POPULATION 11.
|
0.
0.
73. ******************
100. *****************«*********
$00. *******«*****«
1UO. ****»******»»*»*»*»**«
100. »»«*««««*«*««*««*«««o«<»««««»«**«»«)>«»«»«m8(»t**
100. *«*******»»«**«»*»*»***«
1
2
3
4
a
7
a
10
1 1
12
13
14
IB
It
IT
1<
If
20
21
22
23
24
29
2>
Z7
2*
I*
30
31
32
U
34
3B
wi
37
SB
39
40
41
42
43
44
49
46
47
48
40
90
91
92
83
84
99
SB
37
98
8B
6O
ei
02
«
f.4
6
e
e
a
7
7 \
2
3
A
9
y
-------
FREUUENCY DISTRIBUTION
LOCATION! R1CKENBACKEK AFB 19BO
STARTING OATEI 3- 2-60
ABAUFTFBi atmunno \ fie fniir
OCCURKENCt
PARAMETER RANGE FKEUUENCf HFHONIAfiF
2.000 - -1.782 0, 0.
ITT«> . .1 r«lfiBi .'"'' n.
1.564 -1.346 0. 0.
1.346 - -1.128 0. 0.
-1.128 - -.910 0. 0,
-.910 - -.692 0. 0.
-.692 - -.474 2. 18.
,«! « ,.»**> »>. 55.
-.256 - -.038 3. 27.
-.038 - .180 0. 0.
BEYOND MIN/MAX RANGE 0.
TOTAL POPULATION It.
^f CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION
H
O i or*TiOMi Qirtrumtntre AFR (quo
1-1 DATE: 3- 2-eo
PARAMETtRl 24-HOUR LOG EOUT
OCCURRENCE
PARAMETER RANGE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
-2.000 - -1.782 0. 0.
-2.000 - -1.564 0. 0.
-2.000 - -I.3"
66
67
66
60
70
71
72
73
74
7B
V
-------
FREUUENCV DISTRIBUTION
LOCATION: RICKENBACKEH AFB i9eo
STARTING DATEl 3- 2-80
PARAMfTFRI 24-HOUU X EFFICIENCY
OCCURRENCE
PARAMETER RAN.GE ER.EUUEJICI PEKCLNTAGE
60.000 - 63.990 0.
41 T 990 . 67.980 AT
67.980 - 71.970 0.
71.970 - 75.960 0.
75.960 - 79.950 J>.
79.950 - 83.940 0.
63.940 - 87.930 3.
87.930 91.920 3,
91.920 - 95.910 4.
95.910 - 99.900 0.
0.
o.
o.
. ... 0.
0.
30.
10,
40.
0.
HISTOGRAM
**»*****
************
BEYOND MIN/MAX RANGE 0.
TOTAL POPULATION 10.
f CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION
O LOCATtOMI BICKFMIACKFB
AFR 19110
N DATE: 3- 2-80
PARAMETERS 24-HOUR X EFFICIENCY
OCCURRENCE
PARAMETER RANGE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
60.000 - 63.990 0.
60.000 - 67.980 0.
60^000 - 71,970 0.
60.000 - 75.960 0.
60.000 - 79.950 «.
60.000 83.940 0-
60.000 - 67.930 3.
60.000 - 91.920 6.
60,000 - 95.9JO JO,
60.000 - 99.900 10.
BE10NQ MIN/MAX NANCE. 0...
TOTAL POPULATION 10.
i
1
I
T
0.
o.
o.
0.
0.
0.
30.
60.
IUO.
100.
HISTOGRAM
*******«****
»*» *«**«***»»»*»*«*
A***********************************************
A*************************************************
,\
a
3
4
B
7
IO
1 1
ia
13
14
IB
I*
17
10
10
20
21
22
23
24
23
20
27
26
»
3D
31
32
34
39
M>
37
3B
30
40
41
42
43
44
49
47
4B
0
O
1
2
3
4
99
9<
37
50
90
00
*
3
ee
G7
-------
FREUUfcNCY DISTRIBUTION
* LOCATION! RICKENBACKER
* STARTING DATES 3- 2-60
AFU 1980
4
" OCCURRENCE
* P.AR.AM.tlEJl-fiANG.E £REUU£J*CJf PEKCtNIAtE .
7 *
1.700 - 1.730 0. .
10 1.760 - 1.790 0.
" 1.790 - 1.620 0.
11 . _1^.6.a«L - .1.650...... (L.
" 1.650 1.680 0.
]| 1.660 - 1.910 0.
16 1.940 1.970 6.
17 1.970 - 2.0UO 0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
?°t
60.
0.
HISTOGRAM
.»«.. >
A****************************
" BEYOND NIN/MAX RANGE 2.
20 TOTAL POPULATION 10.
21
12
23
" >
" "l CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION
2e H
'" 2 LOCATIDMI RICKEMBACKCQ
AFH 1980
" OATEI 3- 2-80
" PARAMETER: 24-HOUR LOGU EFFICIENCY)
3O
11 OCCURRENCE
32 PARAMETER RANGE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
33
M .700 - .730 0.
" .700 .760 0.
M ,700 - .790 0.
37 .700 - .820 0.
38 .700 .650 0.
1" .700 - .880 A.
40 .700 - .910 0.
!" .700 - .940 2.
" ,700 - ,970 8,
" .700 - 2.000 6.
44
* BCYQ1ULMJN/MAI HUtfiE. 2._
"| TOTAL POPULATION 10.
"
40
40
Sf!
"1
^____
^
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
20.
80.
60.
HISTOGRAM
**********
A***************************************
2
3
4
7
IO
II
12
13
14
IB
16
17
1*
ie
20
21
22
23
24
23
26
30
31
32
34
38
Ml
37
38
39
4O
41
42
43
43
46
47
48
40
SO
31
32
83
84
33
86
87
36
30
6O
61
62
63
bS
06
67
68
7O
71
72
73
74
73
-------
FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION
V
* LOCATION: RICKENBACKEH AFB I9eo
2 STAHTING DATE: s- 2-so
* PARAMETER! 28-HOUR 100-1 EFFICIENCY
4
8 OCCURRENCE:
PARAMETER RANGE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
7
0 .010 - 4.009 0.
4.009 8.008 3.
10 8.008 - 12.007 4.
" 12.007 - 16.006 3.
" 16,0.06 - 20,005 0,
13 20.005 - 24.004 0.
" 24.004 - 28.003 0. '
"> 28.003 32T002 0.
' 32.002 - 36.001 0.
17 36.001 - 40.000 0.
ia
0.
30.
«o.
30.
0. ... ....
0.
0.
o.
0.
0.
HISTOGRAM
**********«******
***************
" BEYOND MIN/MAX RANGE 0.
10 TOTAL POPULATION 10.
21
22
23
2. >
" i CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION
26 H
" ° LOCATION! RICKENBACKER AFB 1980
» OATEI 3- 2-80
" PARAMETER: 24-HOUR loo-x
30
EFFICIENCY
11 OCCURRENCE
" PARAMETER RANGE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
33
34 .010 - 4.009 0.
39 .010 - 8.008 3.
38 .010 12.007 7,
37 .010 - 16.006 10.
38 .010 - 20.005 10.
38 .010 24.004 10.
<° .010 - 28.003 10.
" .010 - 32.002 10.
11 ,010 - 36,001 )0,
" .010 - 40.000 10.
u
" BEYOND MIN/MAX RANGE 0.
46 TOTAL POPULATION 10.
47
46
4U
SO
91
33
33
0.
30.
70.
100.
100.
100.
100.
100.
too!
HISTOGRAM
***************
a**********************************
A************************************************
A*************************************************
A************************************************
a***********************************************
**************************************************
A*************************************************
JV
20
21
22
23
24
29
2«
27
3O
31
32
33
34
39
37
30
30
4O
41
42
43
44
45
«
47
48
49
90
91
92
B3
94
99
96
57
50
99
eo
61
62
63
6
e
c
6
70
71
72
3
4
9
-------
DISTRIBUTION
f
7
a
10
i
t
j
4
9
7
O
(1
34
U
IT
U
tt
JO
11
JJ
U
IS
M
37
30
'
" LOCATION! RICKEMBACKEM
STAftTINS DATCi J- 2-fl(
pABAMfTrBt a«>nniu) Lfl£(
AFB I«»BO ,
100.* CFFICtFMFVl .
OCCURRENCE
PARAMETER RANGE FREUU£KCJf _ PERCENTAGE. _ HISTOGRAM
-2.000 - -1.640 0,
.1.A.4A . .1.2*0 - _'..
1.280 - -.920 0.
-.920 - -.560 0.
. T*S6fl.-- -.200 ....... 0. ...
-.200 - .160 0.
.160 - .520 0.
.680 - 1.240 7.
1.2*0 - 1.600 0.
BEYOND MIN/MAX RANGE 0.
TOTAL POPULATION 10.
'""> CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION
M
O LOCATION! R1CKEMBACKFB
01 DATE: 3- 2-eo
PARAMETERS 24-HOUR LOG(
« M
0. .1
0. '»
0.
0. . . .. . . ..
0. £
70. *»** "
3"
AF(* 1«*0 "
109-1 EFFICIENCY) £
4O
OCCURRENCE "
PARAMETER RANGE FRE8UENCT PERCENTAGE HISTOGRAM "
-2.000 - -1.640 0.
-2.000 - -1.260 0.
2.000 - -.560 0.
-2.000 - -.200 0.
2,000 - .160 t.
2.000 - .520 0.
-2.000 - .860 3.
2{000 - 1*240 JO,
-2.000 - 1.600 10.
EVOND MTN/NAI RANGE 0T
TOTAL POPULATION 10.
0. «
... o! «
0. ^
ftl . n
0. 'J
30. **
100. ********* °
-- - ],
»
S7
aa
70
71
71
74
7»
------- |