v>EPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards
Research Triangle Park NC 27711
EMB Report 78-IOB-5
May 1979
Air
Iron Ore Benefication
Emission Test Report
Reserve Mining
Company
Silver Bay, Minnesota
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
I. Introduction 1
II. Summary and Discussion of Results 5
III. Process Description and Operation 11
IV. Location of Sampling Points 12
V. Sampling and Analytical Procedures 20
APPENDICES
A. Project Participants
B. Field Data Sheets
B-l. Particulate Test Data Sheets
B-2. Sampling Summary Data
B-3. Asbestos Test Data Sheets
B-4. Visible Emissions Data Sheets
C. Summary of Particulate Weight by Fractions
D. Summary of Visible Emissions
E. Example Calculations
F. Calibration Data
G. EPA Method - Determination of Asbestos
Fiber Emissions from Stationary Sources
-------
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
1. Summary of Particulate Concentrations 7
and Mass Loading Rates
2. Summary of Particulate Concentrations 9
and Mass Loading Rates, Fine Crusher
Conveyor-to-Concentrator Baghouse
-------
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure Page
1. Ore Car Dump Sampling Location 13
2. Dock Pellet Storage Silo Sampling Location 14
3. Fine Crusher Sampling Location 16
4. Fine Crusher Conveyor-to-Concentrator 17
Sampling Location
5. Visible Emissions Observer Location 19
Diagram
6. Particulate Sampling Train Diagram 23
7. Asbestos Sampling Train Diagram 21
8. Asbestos Sampling Train Diagram-Dock Pellet 28
Storage Silo Location
-------
I. INTRODUCTION
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) retained
Clayton Environmental Consultants, Inc. to determine
emission and control efficiency data from several
processes at the Reserve Mining Company, in Silver Bay,
Minnesota, for developing emission parameters for well
controlled plants in the metallic mineral processing
industry. The results of this study will assist in
research and development efforts for supporting National
New Source Performance .Standards..
The source testing study included triplicate particulate
and asbestos sample.s obtained from the following process
locations:
1) ore car dump baghouse exhaust ;
2) dock pellet storage silo ventilator stack
(uncontrolled);
3) fine crusher baghouse exhaust; and,
A) the inlet-outlet of .the baghouse controlling
emissions from the fine crusher conveyor-to-
concentrator storage silos.
In addition, each sample run included observation of
visible emissions from each outlet, except at Site 2,
by a certified visible emissions observer. This study
was commissioned as Project No. 78-10B-5, Contract No.
68-02-2817, Work Assignment No. 4.
-------
The Reserve Mining Company plant in Silver Bay is a
fully integrated Taconite ore processing facility
(beneficiation plant). The operations include receiving
raw ore at the ore car dump station, underground
conveyor transport to the fine crusher storage silos,
r
fine crushing}and automated pelletizing and forming of
the finished product. The operations are of a continuous
nature in the main sections of the plant with only the
incoming ore and outgoing pellet operations being
somewhat intermittent.
Sampling was performed by Clayton Environmental
Consultants at Sites 1, 2 and 3 during the week of July
10, 1978 and at Site A on August 28 and 29, 1978. The
control devices on the processes at Sites 1, 3, and 4
are Research-Cottrell Flexkleen baghouses. Site 2
is uncontrolled. All particulate sampling was conducted
in accordance with EPA Methods 1 through 5, and opacity
observations taken in accordance with EPA Method 9.
All asbestos samples were taken in accordance with the suggest.
ed method provided by the EPA; "Determination of Asbestos
Fiber Emissions from Stationary Sources," with analyses
performed by IITRI in accordance with "Electron Miscroscope
Measurement of Airborne Asbestos Concentration, A
Provisional Methodology Manual." Analysis of the samples
is also to include selected area electron diffraction and
- 2 -
-------
electron microprobe in order to identify and fully
characterize the asbestiform materials. The results
of the asbestos testing portion of the program are not
contained herein, as they were not received from IITRI
bythe date of this reporting.
At the ore car dump, operations are semi-continuous;
dumping is interrupted between the completion
of the dumping of one train of cars and the arrival
of another. Therefore, sampling was conducted only
during actual dumping of the ore cars. At the dock
pellet storage silo ventilator stack, operations occur
in three stages: 1) the storage silo is static,
neither being loaded or unloaded; 2) the storage silo
is being loaded; and, 3) the storage silo is being
emptied. Sampling was conducted during conditions 1 and
2. Operation of the Fine Crusher is relatively continu-
ous, being interrupted only during scheduled periods of
maintenance downtime, occurring during the first shift
on Wednesdays, or when mechanical difficulty occurs.
All samples were extracted from the fine crusher baghouse
outlet when the system was operating. The inlet-outlet
of the baghouse controlling emissions from the crusher
conveyor-to-concentrator storage silos is affected
by the same operating conditions as the fine crusher
itself, and sampling was conducted similarly.
- 3 -
-------
The Field Test Team of Clayton Environmental Consultants,
Inc. included Messrs. N.S. Walsh, T.V.Mattson, D.J.
Casiraro, and Ms. D.L. Schick for the testing during
the week of July 10, 1978, and Messrs. N.S. Walsh,
T.V.Mattson, B.F.Elchison, K.E. Dowe 11, and D.J. Casiraro
for the testing during the week of August 28, 1978.
Messrs. R. Schulz, B.Anderson, and D. Chapman of
Reserve Mining Company coordinated plant operations.
Messrs. M. Davenport and J.E.McCarley of EPA observed
the testing program and coordinated activities. A
complete list of the project participants is contained
in Appendix A. »
-------
II. PRESENTATION OF RESULTS
Particulate Emissions
Results of the particulate sampling are presented in
Tables 1 and 2 and are averaged according to sampling
location. These tables contain measured stack gas
conditions including temperature (°F) and flowrate,
expressed as dry standard cubic feet per minute (DSCFM).
Filterable and total particulate concentrations are .
expressed as grains per dry standard cubic foot (gr/DSCF)
and milligrams per cubic meter (mg/m ). Mass loading
rates are presented as filterable and total fractions,
expressed as pounds per hour (Ib/hr) and kilograms
per hour (kg/hr). Results of the asbestos tests are not
contained herein. All field data sheets for the
particulate tests are presented in Appendix B.
Generally, the baghouse controlled fine crusher and ore
car dump facilities (Table 1) and fine crusher conveyor
(Table 2) showed extremely low particulate concentrations
and emission rates, almost identical for the three outlets,
Sampling of the dock pellet storage silo during the
static cycle (neither loading nor unloading) resulted
in higher concentrations (though still considerably low)
while the average emission rate was of the same magnitude
as the average emission rate of the other three outlets
tested. Sample No. 2 taken during silo loading is not
included in the avera.ges for that location, due to the
- 5 -
-------
fact that the concentrations and emission rates are
significantly greater (10-15 times) than for Sample
/
Nos. 1 and 3, taken during static operating conditions
(above).
Specifically, sampling at the ore car dump baghouse
resulted in average filterable and total concentrations
of 0.003 gr/DSCF (7.40 mg/m3) and 0.006 gr/DSCF (13.3
o
mg/m ), respectively. Respective mass loading rates
averaged 1.86 Ib/hr (0.843 kg/hr) and 3.35 Ib/hr (1.52
kg/hr). Average flowrate at this location was 67,100
DSCFM.
Of the three samples taken at the dock storage bin,
Sample No. 2 (obtained during bin loading) yielded
filterable and total particulate concentrations of 0.426
gr/DSCF (976 mg/m3) and 0.435 gr/DSCF (996 mg/m3)
respectively, and filterable and total emission rates of
»
15.3 Ib/hr (6.93 kg/hr) and 15.6 Ib/hr (7.07kg/hr),
respectively. Filterable and total concentrations for
Sample Nos. 1 and 3 averaged 0.024 gr/DSCF (55.0 mg/m3) and
0.028 gr/DSCF (64.1 mg/m3), respectively. Filterable
and total mass loading rates averaged 1.38 Ib/hr (0.624
kg/hr) and 1.61 Ib/hr (0.728 kg/hr), respectively.
Flowrate at this location averaged 5,940 DSCFM.
- 6 -
-------
Table 1. SUMMARY OF PARTICULATE CONCENTRATIONS AND MASS LOADING RATES
Sampling
Location
Ore
Car
Dump
Dock
Pellet
Storage
Silo
Fine
Crusher
1978
Date
7-10
7-10
7-11
Sample
No.
1
2
3
Average
7-12
7-12
7-13
1
2a
3
Average
7-13
7-13
7-14
1
2
3
Average
Stack Gas
Cond i tions
Flowrate
DSCFM
67700
66700
66800
67100
6270
4180
7360
5940
14200
13100
12700
13300
Temp.
80
85
80
82
114
144
95
118
76
75
75
75
Concentrations
Filterable
r/DSCF
0.004
0.003
0.002
0.003
0.030
0.426
0.018
0.024
0.003
0.004
0.003
0.003
mc/m3
9.24
7.25
5.70
7.40
68.3
976
41.6
55.0
7.58
8.64
7.46
7.89
Total
gr/DSCF
0.007
0.005
0.006
0.006
0.034
0.435
0.022
0. 028
0.007
0.005
0.006
0.006
mg/m3
15.3
11.8
12i9
13.3
78.8
996
49.3
64.1
15.7
12.5
14.2
14.1
Mass Loading Rate
Filterable
Ib/hr
2.34
1.81.
1.43
1.86
1.60
15.3
1.15
1.38
0.403
0.424
0.355
0.394
kg/hr
1.06
0*822
0.647
0.843
0.727
6.93
0.520
0.624
0.183
0.192
0.161
0.179
Total
Ib/hr
3.87
2.94
3.23
3.35
1.85
15.6
1.36
1.61
0.836
0.615
0.675
0.709
kg/hr
1.75
1.33
1.47
1.52
0.840
7.07
0.616
0.728
0.379
0.279
0.306
0.321
a Sample taken during bin loading operation; concentrations and mass loading rates are not
included in the average.
-------
Sampling at the fine crusher baghouse outlet resulted
in average filterable and total particulate concentrations
of 0.003 gr/DSCF (7.89 mg/m3) and 0.006 gr/DSCF (14*1
mg/m3), respectively. Respective mass loading rates
averaged 0.394 Ib/hr (0.179 mg/m3) and 0.709 Ib/hr
(o.321 mg/m3). Average flowrate at this location was
13,300 DSCFM.
From Table 2, it can be seen that both the filterable
and total concentrations at the inlet to the fine crusher
conveyor-to-concentrator baghouse averaged 1.31 gr/DSCF
(2990 mg/m3). Average filterable and total mass loading
rates were 335 Ib/hr (152 kg/hr) and 336 Ib/hr (152 kg/hr),
respectively. F.lowrate at the inlet averaged 29,800
DSCFM. Filterable and total concentrations measured at
the outlet averaged 0.004 gr/DSCF (9.55 mg/m3) and
0.006 gr/DSCF (15.0 mg/m3), respectively. Respective
mass loading rates averaged 1.16 Ib/hr (0.527 kg/hr) and
1.83 Ib/hr (0.833 kg/hr). The flowrate at the outlet
averaged 32,600 DSCFM. These emissions represent an average
efficiency for this baghouse of 99.5 percent.
Appendix C contains a summary of the particulate weight
catch by fraction for all samples.
Asbestos Emissions
Results will be included as received from IITRI. Field
data sheets are included in Appendix B.
- 8 -
-------
Table 2. SUMMARY OF PARTICULATE CONCENTRATIONS AND MASS LOADING RATES,
FINE CRUSHER CONVEYOR-TO^CONCENTRATOR BAGHOUSE
1
VO
1
Sampling
Location
Inlet
Outlet
1978
Date
8-29
8-29
8-30
No.
1
2
3
Average
8-29
8-29
8-30
1
2
3
Average
Stack Gas
Conditions
Flowrate
DSCFM
29,400
29,600
30,400
29,800
32,400
32,300
33,100
32,600
Temp.
69
68
65
67
75
75
70
73
Conccntrn tions
Filterable
r/DSCF
1. 10
1.20
1.63
1.31
0.006
0.003
0.003
0.004
mc/m3
2510
2740
3730
2990
14.7
5.98
7.96
9.55
Total
gr/DSCF
1.1.0
1.20
1.63
1.31
0.008
0.004
0.007
0.006
mg/m'
2510
2750
3740
3000
19.2
9.91
15.9
15.0
Mass Loading Rate
Filterable
Ib/hr
276
304
425
335
1.78
0.724
0.986
1.16
kg/hr
25
38
93
52
0.807
0.328
0.447
0.527
Total '
Ib/hr
277
305
426
336
2.33
1. 20
1.97
1.83
kg/hr
126
138
193
152
1.06
0.544
0.895
0.833
-------
Visible Emissions
Opacity determinations were made during each of the
particulate runs at each location with the exception
of the dock pellet storage silo site. Field data
sheets are included in Appendix B. Summaries of
six minute averages for each sample are presented
in Appendix D. Not one of the six minute averages
for any particulate sample exceeded zero.
- 10 -
-------
III. PROCESS DESCRIPTION AND OPERATION
To be supplied by EPA
- 11 -
-------
IV. LOCATION OF SAMPLING POINTS
Ore Car Dump
The ore car dump baghouse (Research Cottrell-Flexkleen)
outlet was the first system tested. It had a 61 inch (155cm)
internal diameter steel stack at the sampling elevation,
which was downstream of the I.D. fan and upstream of
the discharge to atmosphere. Figure 1 shows a
schematic of the sampling location and cross section of
the stack, with sampling points depicted. No site
modifications were necessary as the ports were at least
eight duct diameters downstream and two duct diameters
upstream of the nearest disturbances, allowing a twelve
point (total) traverse to be performed.
Dock Pellet Storage Silo
The dock pellet storage silo ventilator stack was one in
a bank of uncontrolled silo ventilators located in a
building next to the ore loading dock. Pellets are loaded
into and out-of the silo as dictated by production
requirements and shiploading schedules. The stack was
18 inches internal diameter and the stack geometry
required a twelve point (total) traverse for particulate
sampling. A diagram of the sampling location and stack
cross-section is presented in Figure 2. No stack
modifications were necessary.
- 12 -
-------
Figure 1. Ore car dump sampling location
T IT) f_1 f_->
Car Dumping
Facility
Baghouse
•Roofline
Point
1
2
3
4
5
6
Distance (inches)
2.7
9.0
18.0
43.0
52.0
58.3
- 13 -
-------
Vent
stack
t
o
Roof
IjfConveyor
Pellet
storage
silo
Point
1
2
3
4
5
6
Distance
0.8
2.6
5.3
12.7
15.4
17.2
(inches )
Figure 2. Pellet storage silo sampling location
- 14 -
-------
Fine Crusher
The fine crusher baghouse (Research Cottrell-Flexkleen)
outlet is one of a series of baghouses controlling
emissions from the ball mill crushers in the fine
crusher building. The sampling location in the
outlet stack was 32 inches internal diameter, located
downstream of the I.D. fan and upstream of the
atmospheric discharge point. The stack geometry
required a 12 point (total) traverse for particulate
sampling. Figure 3 shows the baghouse outlet location
and a schematic of the stack cross-section.
Fine Crusher Conveyor-to-Concentrator
The conveyor-to-concentrator baghouse in the fine
crusher building was sampled to determine the efficiency
ofthe unit. The inlet duct is 40 inches internal
diameter and the upstream-downstream geometry required
a 16 point (total) traverse. No tests of this inlet
duct had been conducted previous to this test, therefore,
ports were specially installed. The outlet stack is also
40 inches internal diameter, the stack geometry of which
required a 12 point traverse. Figure 4 depicts the
sampling location and a cross-section diagram of each
duct.
- 15 -
-------
Figure 3. Fine crusher sampling location
Fine
Crusher
Baghouse
Baghouse
[Fan
e }
Roof
Stairs
N
Point
1
2
3
4
5
6
Distance (inches)
1.4
4.7
9.4
22.6
27.3
30.6
- 16 -
-------
Roof
3 Outlet
Figure 4. Fine crusher conveyor-to-concentrator
sampling location
Conveyor
INLET
T:-—
2 -
3 -
OUTLET
5 -
i — i — i — 1
1234
56
\ i » -•] /.ft"
678!40
v 7 " /
Point
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Distance, (inches)
1.3
4.2
7.8
12.9
27.1
32.2
36.8
38.7
, i , ..40"I.D.
3 2 1 )
Point Distance (inches)
1
2
3
4
5
6
1.8
5.9
11.8
28.2
34.1
38.2
- 17 -
-------
Opacity Observations
Opacity observations were made during particulate
sampling at Sites 1, 3, and A (above). Figure 5
depicts the location of the opacity observer relative
to each of the stacks.
- 18 -
-------
Figure 5. Visible emissions observer location diagram
Ore Car Dump
Building
~jD--ii:
^
Baghouse Exhaust
Stack
i i /
Observer position Underground conveyor /
Road
Storage Silos
Conveyor to Concentrator
Baghouse stack
server
position
Fine Crusher Building
- 19 -
Crusher Baghouse
-Stack
-------
V. SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
Sampling was conducted according to the guidelines
outlined in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources,
(Federal Register, 40CFR60, December 23, 1971, as
amended through August 18, 1977) Methods 1 through 5,
and according to the method supplied by EPA, "Determina-
tion of Asbestos Fiber Emissions from Stationary Sources''
Appendix G.
Exhaust gas velocity measurements were made using an
S-type Pitot tube and inclined manometer calibrated
in the Clayton Environmental Consultants' laboratory
prior to field use. Velocity pressures were read in
inches of water on the inclined manometer for each
point in the traverse. Exhaust gas temperatures were
measured at each traverse point using a calibrated
potentiometer .and an iron-constantan (I/C) thermocouple
probe attached to the Pitot tube. Exhaust gas flowrates
and isokinetic sampling rates were calculated from each
velocity traverse. The stack gas moisture content was
determined using the volumetric condensate procedure.
Particulate Emissions
Triplicate 60-minute particulate samples were acquired
from each of the four sampling locations with two
exceptions. Sample No. 2 from the dock storage silo
ran for 38 minutes in order to acquire a sample during
- 20 -
-------
actual loading conditions. The other two samples at
this location were taken during static conditions.
The inlet to the baghouse controlling emissions from
the fine crusher conveyor-to-concentrator was sampled
for 64 minutes (16 points at four minutes per point).
The particulate sampling train used at each of the four
locations consisted of a sharp, tapered, stainless-steel
sampling nozzle, a heated glass sampling probe, a tared
110-mm Type A glass fiber filter enclosed in a heated
filter box, one modified and one standard Greenburg-
Smith impinger each containing 100-ml of distilled water,
an empty modified Greenburg-Smith impinger, a modified
Greenburg-Smith impinger containing 400 grams of silica
gel, a leakless pump with vacuum gauge, a calibrated
dry-gas meter equipped with bimetallic inlet and outlet
thermometers, and a calibrated orifice-type flow meter
that was connected to an inclined manometer. The
impingers, connected in series, were immersed in an ice
bath to maintain .the temperature in the last impinger
at 70CF or less. All of the sampling train glassware was
connected by ground-glass joints}sealed with stopcock
grease, and clamped to prevent leakage. A calibrated
S-type Pitot tube was connected to the sampling probe
and velocity pressures were read on the inclined manometer.
At the dock pellet storage silo sampling location, a heated
- 21 -
-------
Teflon extension was used to connect the probe to
the heated filter. A schematic diagram of the
sampling train used for sampling at each location is
depicted in Figure 6.
Prior to and upon completion of each sample run, the
entire sampling train was leak tested, in accordance
with the requirement that a leak rate of 0.02 cubic
feet per minute at 15 inches of mercury vacuum not
be exceeded prior to sampling and a leak rate of 0.02
cubic feet per minute at the greatest sampling vacuum
not be exceeded after sampling.
Isokinetic sampling rates were maintained by monitoring
the exhaust gas velocity pressure and temperature and
gas-meter temperatures at each of the sampling points,
and making appropriate adjustments in the sampling
flowrate.,
At the end of each test the particulate sampling train
was removed to a cleanup area at the site for sample
transfer. The nozzle, probe, Teflon extension (when
used) and front half of the glass filter holder were
rinsed and brushed with acetone and the rinsings placed
in a glass sample bottle with a Teflon-lined cap.
At the fine crusher conveyor baghouse, an initial water
rinse was performed on this portion of the train resulting
in an additional fraction at this location only. The
- 22 -
-------
Figure 6. Particulate sampling train diagram
Thermocouple
I
to
wall
Thermometer
Nozzle
S-Type
Pi tot Tube
Heated Fiberglass
glass probe FilterX
Thermometer
By-Pass
/Valve
Vacuum Gauge
Manometer
Dry Gas
Meter
Air Tight
Pump
Vacuum
Line
-------
filter was carefully removed from the filter holder
and placed in its original petri dish for weighing
in the laboratory. The impingers were then disassembled
and the condensate volumes recorded and placed in
another glass sample bottle. Each impinger and
connecting glassware was then rinsed initially with
water then with acetone and brushed as necessary; the
rinsings were placed in separate glass sample bottles.
The weight gain (as condensate) of the silica gel was
then determined.
In the particulate train as described, the acetone rinse
from the probe, nozzle, filter holder, Teflon extension
(when used) and the filter catch were considered to
constitute the "front-half" or filterable particulate.
The particulate matter captured within the impingers
was considered to be condensable particulate or "back-
half" catch. The combination of the two fractions result-
ed in "total" particulate which, although not required
to be reported under Method 5, is reported herein for
comparison purposes. Therefore, at the end of each test
the following sample fractions were available for analysis
1) Acetone rinsings of nozzle, probe, Teflon extension
and front half of the filter housing;
2) Distilled water rinsing of nozzle, probe, Teflon
extension, and front half of the filter housing
(fine crusher conveyor baghouse only);
- 24 -
-------
3) Glass-fiber filter;
A) Impinger contents, and distilled water rinsings; and,
5) Acetone rinsings of impingers.
In the laboratory, Fractions 1, 2, 4, and 5 were placed
in beakers. Fractions 2 and A were evaporated to residue
at 105°C. Fractions 1 and 5 were dried in an oven at
32°C with circulating air while reaching constant weight.
Fraction 3 was vacuum-desiccated to constant weight
at room temperature. All fractions were weighed on
an analytical balance having a sensitivity of at least
0.1 milligram to determine the weight of the particulate
collected. Appendix C presents the particulate weight
summary for each of the fractions analyzed in each of
the tests.
Asbestos
Triplicate samples were extracted isokinetically at each
of the four sampling locations to be analyzed for asbestos.
At each location, except the dock pellet storage silo,
an in-stack filtration train was employed consisting
of a stainless-steel sampling nozzle, 47mm stainless-
steel filter holder containing a polycarbonate membrane
filter (a cellulose-acetate filter was used for one
sample only at the ore car dump location), a short
stainless steel probe, 200 grams of silica gel,
a leakless pump with vacuum g'auge, a calibrated dry-gas
- 25 -
-------
meter equipped with bimetallic inlet and outlet thermom-
eters, and a calibrated orifice-type flow meter that
was connected to an inclined manometer. This train
is diagrammed in Figure 7. At the dock pellet storage
silo an out-of-stack filtration system was used due to
the saturated condition of the exhaust gas. This train
consisted of a stainless-steel sampling nozzle, heated
glass probe, heated Teflon extension, a 47mm polycarbonate
membrane filter inside a heated stainless-steel filter
holder, 200 grams of silica gel, a leakless pump with
vacuum gauge, a calibrated dry-gas meter equipped with
bimetallic inlet and outlet thermometers, and a calibrated
orifice-type flow meter that was connected to an inclined
manometer,. The train is diagrammed in Figure 8.
Asbestos sampling was conducted for a period varying
between fifteen seconds and seven minutes, depending
on the location and the expected concentrations that
existed in the stacks.
At the end of the sampling period the polycarbonate or
cellulose-acetate filter was transferred to its petri
dish and all portions of the train upstream from the
filter were rinsed with acetone. The rinsings were
collected in glass sample bottles with Teflon-lined
caps. These two fractions were then shipped to the IITRI
laboratory in Chicago, Illinois where they were analyzed
by electron microscopy for asbestos. Once received by
IITRI, the samples were split so that representative
- 26 -
-------
Fieure 7.' Asbestos sampling train diagram
10
-j
Filter
X
T-f
r
_
Stack
^-"Wall
Stainless
steel probe
/
Nozzle
S-Type
PI tot Tube
Flexible
Silica Gel
Manometer
Flow Rate
Meter
Vacuum
ine
Vacuum Gauge
Manometer
Dry Gas
Meter
Air'Tight
Pump
-------
to
oo
Heated fiberglass filter
J Short stainless steel
.•'.•• ;•"• • • • • it; robe
S-type
Pitot
tube
Heated
Teflon
extensIon
Manometer
r I o fl A ft ^ O f
1 1 -. _ ect
r • o o Ou n ri
1 1
1 1
-
*»
-
«*
I;
1
1
J
Thermometers
Silica gel
Main
va Ive
Leakless
pump
Vacuum gauge
Manome ter
Figure 8. Asbestos sampling train diagram
Pellet storage silo location
-------
portions could be returned to Reserve Mining Company
for analysis.
Visible Emissions
Opacity determinations were made, according to EPA
Method 9, during each particulate sample at each location
with the exception of the dock pellet storage silo site.
Readings were recorded each 15 seconds by a qualified
observer of visible emissions. Readings were then
averaged over a six minute period. These results are
tabulated in Appendix D.
- 29 -
-------
APPENDIX A
.PROJECT PARTICIPANTS
-------
PROJECT PARTICIPANTS
'Clayton Environmental Consultants, Inc.
N. Steve Walsh Director, Air Resource Engineering
Timothy V. Mattson Source Sampling Specialist
Daniel J. Casiraro Source Sampling Specialist
Donna L. Schick Environmental Data Specialist
Bruce F. Elchison Senior Environmental Technician
Kenneth E. Dowell Environmental Control Engineer
Cheryl R. Kluk Laboratory Technician
Corrine A. Conklin Laboratory Technician
David J. Holmberg Assistant Director, Laboratory
Services
Reserve Mining
R. Schulz
B. Anderson
D. Chapman
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
M. Davenport
J.E. McCarley
-------
APPENDIX B
•FIELD DATA SHEETS
B-l. Particulate Test Data Sheets
B-2. Sampling Summary Data
B-3. Asbestos Test Data Sheets
B-4. Visible Emissions Data Sheets
-------
APPENDIX B-l
PARTICIPATE TEST DATA SHEETS
-------
SAMPLING TRAIN DATA
Company;
Source Designation:
Date: "7//Q
C/q
-------
SAMPLING TRAIN DATA
Company:
Source Designation:
Date :
7
Test Number:
Field Person:_
Filter Numbers
Barometric Pressure ("Hg) ; o*-9.
- /g*g" -
Stack Static Pressure ("H?0); i~<
Stack Dimensions; &, I "(•"
Plume Appearance:
Ambient Temperature(°F):
Record all Data Every
Filter Heater Setting:
Probe Heater Setting:
Nozzle Number; /£/ , Dia. (in.); „
Pitot Tube No . /t^^ Corr.Factor; m 5p>c/a
Meter Box No y^fe. ) , Corr. Factor;/fc
Meter Isokinetic Factor ; ^7 ^_?
Assumed Moisture(%); / &
Condensate Volume (ml); 4^.^^-Jl
Minutes
Silica Gel Weight Gain(g)t /f.
Leak Rate #, QQ/ CFM at
^.se/ " f'
Trav
erse
Poin
No.
Time
Samp-
ling
(min ]
Clock
7elocit>
Pres sure
("H20)
Stack
Temp
Dry Gas Meter
Vo lume
(ft3)
Temp(°F)
InletOutlet
Orifice
Pressure
Differ-
ential
C"H20)
Filter
Box
Temp
Last
Imp.
Gas
TempPre
(IF)
Sampling)
Train -
Static
:ssure|
("Hg) .
s
Ll
£13
/7/7
050
H./
C/AsO
/op-
Ji.0.
n^
f 07
(66
60
AVERAGE (TOTAL)
Q
j
rt
Clayton Environmental Consultants, Inc.
-------
SAMPLING TRAIN DATA
Company:
Source Designation; OiQfz
Date:
jDU/H/°
^JL /i
Test Number:_
Field Person:
Filter Number:
Barometric Pressure ("Hg):
Stack Static Pressure ("HoO) : ~t
Stack Dimensions; ^/
Plume Appearance:
Ambient Temperature(°F):
Record all Data Every
Filter Heater Setting: ~
Probe Heater Setting: ^"
Nozzle Number ; sty ,Dia. (in. ) ; ^
Pitot Tube No ._^., Corr . Factor;
Meter Box Noy(3frc /, Corr . Factor;
Meter Isokinetic Factor ; /
Assumed Moisture (70) :X6
Condensate Volume (ml ); ~~
j-* Minutes
Silica Gel Weight Gain(g); /£.
Leak Rate Q. g>oS CFM at
Trav-
erse
Point
No.
Time
Samp-
ling
(rain )
Clock
Velocity
Pressure
("H20)
Stack
Temp
Dry Gas Meter
Volume
(ft3)
Temp (°F)
Inlet Outle t
Orifice
Pressure
Differ-
ential
("H20)
Filter
Box
Temp
Last Campling
Imp. Train
Gas Static
Temp Pressure
("Hg)
O
£1
LI
J£-
UL
AQ_
•7
8-
°
/. 0
1.0
IM-
/. 0
Sc-C
(3
1.7/6
8-5
U
LU-
APT
ST./
.87
i
/zyL
AVERAGE (TOTAL)
Clayton Environmental Consultants, Inc.
-------
Company:
Source Designation:
Date:
SAMPLING TRAIN DATA
Test Number:
Field Person:
Filter Number:
Barometric Pressure ("Hg):
Stack Static Pressure ("HoO):-!1-
.ft II A - ^ ~
> f%_
Stack Dimensions:
Plume Appearance:
Ambient Temperature(°F):
Record all Data Every
Minutes
Filter Heater Setting: .2
Probe Heater Setting;
Nozzle Number -. tf/6 ,Dia.(in.);
Pitot Tube No.%?/ , Corr . Factor ;_^
Meter Box No^^/ , Corr. Factor;^ ^
Meter Isokinetic Factor:
Assumed Moisture(%):
Condensate Volume (ml) :_ __
Silica Gel Weight Gain(g):
Leak Rate Q, o>-S CFM at
Trav-
erse
Point
No.
Time
Samp-
ling
(min)
Clock
Velocit>
Pressure
("H20)
Stack
Temp
Dry Gas Meter
Vo lume
Temp(°F)
InletOutlet1
Orifice
Pressure
Differ-
ential
("H20)
Filter
Box
Temp
Last
Imp.
Gas
Temp
Sampling]
Train -
Static
Pressure!
("Hg) '
0
7/
/.O
r
72
. TJ
13
/.<
/CO
-------
SAMPLING TRAIN DATA ^^l ^ ) 1*
Company: .^Sefut^ A(/AJ//0^ tfe — €-Pf\ TA-$j£r V
Source Designation: $gg> lUcXL^ ^4-me^ SL^. ,
Date: 1-ll~l% °
Test Number: P" 3~~ L-(fadi*4
Field Person: tiSbJ^hl— ^
Filter Number: f\-l%%~0&
Barometric Pressure ("Hg): 3_C\. /#
Stack Static Pressure ("
Stack Dimensions:
Plume Appearance
H20): 1^ /, 6
/#" /.D.
*
Ambient Temperature (°F) :
Record all Data Every
Trav-
erse
Point
No.
^UJtf
$
i
3-
I
A/ a) (f
^
^
3
J-i
ll
f
f
I
Time
Samp-
ling
(min)
0
5
10
10
y
^o
^jljf
s/fo
\6
*)\
0s
IpO
Clock
no?
n0#
n/'j
n/?
/ *^ o ^
n?j
)/l33
nf?
\
\
\
5"/Oc
Velocity
Pres sure
("H20)
^^
/.o
0,^0
l*l
6\^
0,V5
0^^
AVERAGE (TOTAL)
Stack
Temp
U5
H &
\50
110
15/J
1*0
l?0
Minutes
Filter Heater Setting:
Probe Heater Sett
Nozzle Number: fy
Pitbt Tube No. j/
Meter Box No.#/)^
ing:
C£,Dia.
,Corr .
J,Corr
Meter Isokinetic Factor
Assumed Moisture (%):
Condensate Volume
Silica Gel Weight
Leak Rate fy ot>D
Dry Gas Meter
Volume
(ft3)
^.O/^ Q ^ 2
4-&13I
i^Odch
A3A&
^.^/ SLA
ff?S ?
^5.^/0
5^ gj|
'
(^/.^^)
Temp (°F)
Inlet
tl*
%3
81
°[0
^
^
w
$4
Outle t
^3
^
TS
^
W
W
^
1^
Orifice
Pressure
Differ-
ential
^§^
iO^
1 \
Q.W
\
le(f
T
Sampling
Train
Static
Pressure
("Hg)
••
Clayton Environmental Consultants, Inc,
-------
SAMPLING TRAIN DATA
Company:_
Source Designation:
Date: *7 //2
T6CJ£.
Test Number:
Field Person:
Filter Number; /^- /
Barometric Pressure ("Hg):
Stack Static Pressure ("HoO) : •*-
c, 11 i » ———
Stack Dimensions; /& d
Plume Appearance:
Ambient Temperature (°F) :_
Record all Data Every £ Minutes
Filter Heater Setting:
Probe Heater Setting:
Nozzle Number y^S^^Dia. (in. ) ;
Pitot Tube No.3y ,Corr.Factor;
Meter Box No^9C > Corr. Factor;
Meter Isokinetic Factor:
Assumed Moisture(%):
Condensate Volume(ml);
Silica Gel Weight Gain(g):
Leak Rate ^ flO.<" CFM at
Trav-
erse
Point
No.
Samp-
ling
(min)
Time
Clock
Velocit
Pressure
("H20)
Stack
Temp
Dry Gas Meter
Volume
Temp(°F)
InletOutlet
Orifice
Pressure
Differ-
ential
("H20)
Filter
Box
Temp
LastSampling
Imp. Train
Gas Static
Temp Pressure
("Hg)
D
5"
/C
L?
V.o
a-
570
HI
76
ii/C?
I.I
a
-.3.0-0
/ox
J.o
V.O
ss
'9 3.?
AVERAGE (TOTAL)
Clayton Environmental Consultants, Inc,
-------
SAMPLING TRAIN DATA
Company: brf-f^ /{JXLeA/l*-'
Source Designation: A^L^ fru^d^ Q+d*,,J-~
Date: "T^ f 1> -~78
u Filter Heater Setting:
Test Number : $~ \
Field Person: TYM - MSuJ
Filter Number \-f\- \%% - 07
Barometric Pressure ("Hg): JLf
.•^-^
Stack Static Pressure ("H,0): •<- ,A^b
Stack Dimensions: ^T,'1 "
Plume Appearance
PD
:
Ambient Temperature (°F) :
Record all Data Every
Trav-
erse
Point
No.
* L*
£
4
•2>
•p,
\
u;
^
4
5,
3,
1
Time
Samp-
ling
(min)
0
6
\o
i£
9-°
^^
1>0
—
^£
4o
^
So
S£
U>
Clock
n.'io
nus
P',Z0
nu£
\T>^q
nv2>£
!7^4o
n^
n:sD
n • ^
ij
Meter Box No.$4-£
Meter Isokinetic
Assumed Moisture (
Condensate Volume
Silica Gel Weight
Leak Rate Q
Velocity
Pressure
("H20)
,70
,UU
.5*8
i53
» .SO
,4fc
.SO
f4fe
,47
:^
,^e
^s
AVERAGE (TOTAL)
Stack
Temp
/ O TJ» \
^^\ I
"7A
( t^
7A
7(,
7(-
-74
7^
/ v^
/ C^?
7fe
74
Dry Gas Meter
Vo lume
(ft3)
SkS.SCB
S10MO
57S.440
^J^.^Q
SS4-
(if -
1(3
114
IDT'
Outle t
Vy* ^
Tt f \^
?7
Cj^
qv
94
IfT
qf
%
0-7
??
??
^^
^
Orifice
Differ-
ential
("H20)
3,^0
3,0^
3|-)gL
^.AXJ
^.•^b
1.^
O-^S"
,3,^o
tf-v *-k 1
^^ * Os. »
4it/
^,03
403
jM
ing:
,Dia.
, Corr .
/ ,Corr
Factor
%): ,
(in.
): .349
Factor: vS4jJj
.Fac
: /
l^lll 1^
7^»*
tf
(ml): ^
Gain(g): ^ f <-/
CFM at l^T "Hg
Filter
Box
Temp
7.00
^/S
7/5"
^o
C?^
Ho
190
/ST
IfiS"
1^0
i^io
no
Last
Imp .
Gas
Temp
SO
"?4
ft^,
74
70
^
74
W
^
M>
(^
6r
Sampling
Train
Static
Pre ssure
("Hg)
O
O
(9
O
t>
0
O
D
O
O
O
La
Clayton Environmental Consultants, Inc,
-------
SAMPLING TRAIN DATA
4,41
Company;
£ ' rT —
Designation:
"? - 13 -I %•
Source
Date :
Test Number; P~")
Field Person; ~T\ffiA -
Filter Number; fl,|«gff
Barometric Pressure ("Hg):
Stack Static Pressure ("H20):
Stack Dimensions :_
Plume Appearance :_
Ambient Temperature(8F):
Record all Data Every
Filter Heater Setting :
Probe Heater Sett ing :
Nozzle Number; J^ , Dia. (in. ) ; .,
/-ruXcA''
"7Q
Minutes
Pitot Tube No.g/ ,Corr.Factor;
Meter Box No.ffiC I » Corr. Factor;
Meter Isokinetic Factor:
Assumed Moisture (%):_
Condensate Volume(ml):
Silica Gel Weight Gain(g); *<£
Leak Rate
CFM at
Trav
erse
Poin
No.
Time
Samp-
ling
(rain)
0
0
56
Clock
Velocit
Pressure
C"H20)
AVERAGE (TOTAL)
Stack
Temp
C°F)
"70
2L
Dry Gas. Meter
'
Vo lume
Temp (°F)
Inlet Outle t
103
in.
\(o
u
Orifice
Pressure
Differ-
ential^.
("H20)
Filter
Box
Temp
;5
L3±
Las
Imp.
Gas
Temp
So
£00
C°F)
t Sampling)
Train
Static
Pressure!
ID
7?
o
o
Clayton Environmental Consultants, Inc,
-------
SAMPLING TRAIN DATA
Company; £.}'/-\ " l'\j> f±*.
Source Designatl
Date: ~?~_[4 -~
on: y/::..,:t' <*-Vc, »/*,- A.-- v,.-rf
n f
Test Number: (•' ~^>
Field Pers
on: /Cv'sU..' »/•£ -a A'
Filter Number: f\ -. j^-OQ
Barometric Pressure ("Hg):' XjLcl./7
Stack Static pressure ("H?0): 4-^A-O
Stack Dimensions: ^'2.'' 1
"-\>
Plume Appearance:
Ambient Temperature (°F) :
Record all Data Every
Trav-
erse
Point
No.
5
«5
J
"3
X
)
^A
tf
j
3
7,
|
Time
Samp-
ling
(min)
£>
g
/&
;j
£p
Z^
3&
- •
3
Clock
0^00
66>
IP&D
{-&-&$
[£[><
PI*>
bio
/
pl^
]$)&
Fi'lter Heater Setting: —
Probe Heater Setting: *~
Nozzle Number :/4_, Dia .
Pitot Tube No. ^/ ,Corr.
Meter Box No.^ftr^_- ,Corr
Meter Isokinetic Factor
Assumed Mois ture (%) : 2-
Condensate Volume
(in.
) : . P.49
Factor : i§V^
/O. 36
£,5T-^r
AVERAGE (TOTAL)
Stack
Temp
•76
?^
75-
7<
?r
-?r
—
7<
^
1<
7^
1<
7^
Minutes
Leak RateO«O/ CFM at 2/^ "Kg
Dry Gas Meter
Volume
(ft3)
fclc'.sy;
Co^l . 2-3
7^/-W
ffi^ >a 1
1^ f3
?/*/' ^'
9w .0^
^t'^^
72^ /-?
1^/1^
Q^0./X
iM'i*
O^C" /^
/ y t? ( u?7
(^I^V c. ' ^^
I I \ *\***} 1
Temp (°F)
Inlet
74
fl-
?2^
£fc
H
tfi-
-
W
S£
^/
f/
/^T>
^.''
Outle t
^-j
7&
If
If
if
Fo
-
%
-
/?$"
^
2x>f
2^>C
i^&&
/j&TJ
Last
Imp.
Gas
Temp
7^
^^
£T
7^
-
7^
76
76
^4
<£~2£
GL.
6-L
Sampling
Train
Static
Pre ssur e
("Hg)
n
cD
^
^
o
o
—
^
a
^
io*^
C5'!^
A
Clayton Environmental Consultants, Inc.
-------
SAMPLING TRAIN DATA
/.37
Nl
P\*J
Company: £_^
Source Designation: - j • J '/ ?'ff Jr^t*^^ ^•Uc-v^-d/t/ kTT'M/***^"1*' $&&A>ffiis3£*s "&)?J\t • (?^ 03 *75f
* r? ff\l "" i 0
Filter Heater Setting:
Test Number: /?- /
Field Person: ^V>1 /^£
Filter Number: /?-3#9-/4
Baromctric Pressure ("Kg): 5-'?. /"?
Stack Static Pressure ('
Stack Dimensions: 40" "£>
H?0): -r .35
?
Plume Appearance: £jKtctvw
Ambient Temperature (°F) :
Record all Data Every
Trav
er se
Point
No.
t
5
A-
•$
"^Y/
|
t
£
4
3
Q-
1
Time
Samp-
ling
(min)
0
£
)0
1^"
3o
3£
^
—
!>$"
4t>
45"
SD
s$
frtP
Clock
|£1<#
i4>(,!3
j4'.(g
l V5'^y"7
i / • A/^
(fc',4£
if^s
ft7^eo
n:ob
|7.'/(?
I7I/^
17-^
|7;^5
7o
5 Minutes
Probe Heater Setting:
Nozzle Number ; ^/i
Pitot Tube No. IO
^_,Dia.
,Corr.
(in.
): .1275
Factor: » S3fl
Meter Box No./^C/ ', Corr. Factor: /.^
Meter Isokinetic Factor: J&8J
Assumed Moisture (Z): 3
Condensate Volume (ml): &
Silica Gel Weight Gain(g): /f/.^
Leak Rate <-.^C>5" CFM at /5~ "Hg
Velocity
Pressure
("H20)
.3
l.^T
1-4-
\,^
),^
i(^
|.7£-
(,4^
I.S"
,4
l.?>
\.^$
AVERAGE (TOTAL)
Stack
Temp
"75"
If
7f
If?
7^
75
IS
7.<
7^"
7^
-7^
75"
Dry Gas Meter
Volume
(ft3)
8*7. «:f
?^. f4
294.^7
W-73
fe.V
^5*93
9^ 5/7
^9.bl1
9/3- "57
9/7.5?
92./.3S
^S,^|
1,^
Orifice
Pressure
Differ-
ential
("H20)
l.to
3.0^
/.%
(\(^
1,70
I.M-
f^l
5.04-
.$.•>
/,9^
^^
A77
U^
Filter
Box
Temp
tf?
9-to
H^
2££
1^
£70
31$
&W
3S5
#»S
^£•5
Last
Imp
Gas
lemp
f^
90
36
Tff
7^
7^"
71
'11'
11
73-
jz.
Sampling
Train
Static
Pressure
("Hg)
I\O
/.o
1*0
l.o
/.o
/.o
j,0
7.0
AO '
//o
io
l.o
Clayton Environmental Consultants, Inc.
-------
SAMPLING TRAIN DATA
/-37 ^ H
/ 1 f ^" /*) l( f) »
Company: £/,S £ r /I " KtA£/vvvx Ceyi^tfJb/A^s J>4.4hruA*s -£<*^u^i
Date: ^-£^1-1$
Test Number: 9-^" ,
Field Person: -flfM &££,
Filter Number: f\-3£3-*QgL £>£-
Barometric Pressure ("Hg): 3*?./7
Stack Static Pressure ("H20): + .%%
Stack Dimensions: 4-0' XP
Plume Appearance
: /jJutA/
Ambient Temperature (°F) :
Record all Data Every
Trav-
erse
Point
No.
fct
5
A-
7,
9-
\
^ ' (t>
5
4
3
y
}
Time
Samp-
ling
(min)
O
g
(0
In
20
^
IP
—
35
4o
4f?
5o
5^
to
Clock
/?,57
)^;^
\^.o7
\T-i9-
f^.'n
W-1^
|Qi-2>C
( b> t?
jfif)
3.0
/.7?
/,5D
\.j ••
(in.
): .It7>~
Factor: .83^
.Factor;
: 14=8)
(ml): ^.O
Gain(g): //.«*T^
CFM at \5" Cx^Hg
Filter
Box
Temp
3U>
577
^
AfS
J47
%9f
2Lo
3*>$
3*0
&£
32®
Last
Imp .
Gas
Temp
7o
U*
^
d(~
t't?
(0 \3
fe
a
(of
(£
feo
a
Samp ling
Train
Static
Pressure
("Hg)
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
&
O
O
O
O
Clayton Environmental Consultants, Inc
-------
SAMPLING TRAIN DATA
t /../. ^. /'//T "~ A_
Company:
Source Designation; "#,„,._
^•V-l
'>'
//>;,.„
Date:
-7$
Test Number:
Field Person:
p- 3
,q - 33?
.? f.
Filter Number:
Barometric Pressure ("Hg):
Stack Static Pressure ("HgO) ; -f .
Stack Dimensions: -/£' '
Plume Appearance: d-^J^
Ambient Temperature (°F):_
Record all Data Every.
^Filter/Heater Setting:
Probe Heater Setting:
Nozzle Number '.'*//(- ,Dia. (in. ) '._t
Pitot Tube No. jQ» Corr. Factor ;
Meter Box No. ^g /, Corr. Factor;
Meter Isokinetic Factor; /
Assumed Moisture (%); 3
Condensate Volume (ml):
Silica Gel Weight Gain(g); «?-. ?•
Minutes Leak Rate
CFM at
/$"
Trav-
erse
Point
No.
N
fc
5
4
3
2
i
6G
S
4
3
5-
t
Time
Samp-
ling
(min)
0
S
Jo
(>
10
•T^
P-b
30
—
^
4o
4S
50
5^
fcO
Clock
15: rt
isiB^
15:4i
15tA4»
\5:5|
\5:Sb
|^0i
lb*^
1^: \^
ib'.i'S
l^.iG
lfe;38
1^:33
ito^-
Velocity
Pressure
("H20)
!/2>5
\,40
i.5
\^6
i^
Ui
Ls
1.4-S
l^
135
1.95"
Lc>5
AVERAGE (TOTAL)
Stack
Temp
(°F)
7^
10
10
*\o
10
10
lo
10
1«9
"70
76
10
Dry Gas Meter
Vo lume
(ft3)
W,1>EC
983*0!
2^4
ID045."265-
|oo^3sa
ioio.a4
10|4
ioa8.tfl7
c44$3>
Temp (°F)
Inle
4,4-
70
74
~7S
^
H
.~?7
33
K
W
^
°(0
• :> '••-
' w -^
Outle t
(A-
U-
i*Z
ui
^r
10
73-
"?4-
15"
16
7G
1?
^
r\(j>-
Orifice
Pres sure
Differ-
ential
("H20)
/43
l.^f
SL,o.«r
/.%
/.?0
1.58L
3.07
2.09-
3,0°?
/.W
A75-
f,4-*
v ^ : .->
I ••. j -'
Filter
Box
Temp
(eF)
a9o
^=S
^^
£5^-
^5&
a46
Samplin
Train
Static
Pressur
("Hg)
o
O
0
c
o
0
0
o
n
o
o
o
Clayton Environmental Consultants, Inc,
-------
SAMPLING TRAIN DATA
Company-
Source Designation:
Date: gfw/'JX
u e^/; r
j3/
/ae
T
1SIA ~
Test Number: \—\. (_"?
Field Person:_
Filter Number;
Barometric Pressure ("Hg) :
Stack Static Pressure ("H20):
Stack Dimensions ; *f £>
Plume Appearance:
,Dia, (in.); /
Ambient Temperature(CF):
Record all Data Every
ff
Minutes
Filter Heater Setting; —
Probe Heater Setting; "~
Nozzle Number;3/
Pitot Tube No. JO , Corr. Factor ;
Meter Box No.^^jJ^', Corr. Factor:
Meter Isokinetic Factor:
Assumed Moisture(%); ^
Condensate Volume(ml);
Silica Gel Weight Gain(g); /
Leak Ra t e x^-. g£> 5~ CFM at /
"Hg
xd HA
Tr av
er se
Point
No.
Time
Samp-
ling
(tain)
Clock
>locity
Pressure
("H20)
Stack
Temp
Dry Gas Meter
Volume
(ft3)
Temp('>F)
In let Outlet
Orifice
Pressure
Differ-
ential
("H20)
Filter
Box
Temp
Last Sampling
Imp. Train
Gas Static
Temp Pressure
("Hg)
£-
f/7/tf
7?
A
A 4,7
/
-^"^Ify-
3-
(610
TO
3
=\&-
U
3Z
£2.
2,0
3d-
10
•H
66
H
lllh
1A
I'll
AVERAGE (TOTAL)
Clayton Environmental Consultants, Inc.
-------
SAMPLING TRAIN DATA
Company.:
Source Designation:
Date: ?"->?-7?
£ ' // " rY^&Wb-^, //U'TL/fM
Test Number:
Field Person:
Filter Number; /)- -
Barometric Pressure ("Hg):
Stack Static Pressure ("H2
Stack Dimensions '•___JJ_O^_
Plume Appearance:
Ambient Temperature (°F) :
Record all Data Every
Filter Heater Setting:
Probe Heater Setting:_
Nozzle Number; ^4 ,Dia. (in.);
Pitot Tube No. t(? , Corr. Factor ;
Meter Box No. RM3 ', Corr .Factor;
Minutes
Meter Isokinetic Factor:
Assumed Moisture(%); g
Condensate Volume(ml):
Silica Gel Weight Gain(g):
Leak Rate /) ,&Q "L~ CFM at
"Hg
Trav-
erse
Point
No.
7^
/
\
Time
Samp-
ling
(rain)
$(,
fl f\
V
Clock
Yl\\
111)
(7V?
Velocity
Pressure
("H20)
1,70
Q.^
AVERAGE (TOTAL)
Stack
Temp
(°F)
&,
(,(*
Dry Gas Meter
Vo lume
(ft3)
7/Al^
177. 6
W2S/
(47,^3)
Temp(°F)
Inlet
^lo
i>
^
Outle t
52,
^1
^
Orifice
Pressure
Differ-
ential
("H20)
IfH
I'tf
U(1
Filter
Box
Temp
<^&
P"7d)
Last
Imp.
Gas
Temp
(>f
66
Sampling
Train
Static
Pressur
("Hg)
2/D
1o
-
Clayton Environmental Consultants, Inc.
-------
Company::
Source Designation; py
Date: ' "
Test Numbc'r:
SAMPLING TRAIN DATA
M(Ht,
h>-u-i~t?
Field Person:
Filter Number:
Barometric Pressure ("Hg
Stack Static Pressure ("
Stack Dimensions; jjo" ^-
Plume Appearance:
);
H20)
) ~J
Ambient Temperature (°F) ;
Record all Data Every
Filter Heater Setting; —
probe Heater Setting:
Nozzle Number '"^/IJL ,Dia. (in.);j3
Pitot Tube NQ./H ,Corr.Factor;
Meter Box No.y%4c3 , Corr. Factor;"
Meter Isokinetic Factor:
Assumed Moisture (7.) ; -3
Condensate Volume(ml):
Silica Gel Weight Gain(g):
tJ. Minutes Leak Rate £6t6ti5 CFM at AS"""' "Hg
Trav
er se
Point
No.
Time
Samp-
ling
(rain)
Clock
Velocity
Pressure
("H20)
Stack
Temp
Dry Gas Meter
Volume
(ft3)
Temp (°F)
Inlet Outlet
Orifice
Pressure
Differ-
ential
("H20)
Filter
Box
Temp
Last Sampling
Imp. Train
Gas Static
rempjpressure
("Hg)
If
7
/.?y
i/,
ST
S-
*3
n
f?-
61
32
32-
7-
0 0 .
5
OlKrf
/<*$
(ft
t.lo
2.
fi.tf
a 75
AVERAGE (TOTAL)
^
-------
" N
Company.:;
Source Designation:
Date :
SAMPLING TRAIN DATA
HtXt
Ayy^-j
?1«yf
Test Number;' f* ~3
Filter Heater Setting; ~
Probe Heater Setting:
Field Person:_
Filter Number:
Barometric Pressure ("Hg):
Stack Static Pressure
Stack Dimensions:
Plume
t - J. 7
Nozzle Number :J^4_,Dia. (in. ):_,
Pitot Tube No. j^_,Corr. Factor :_. _
Meter Box No.ffftCJ .', Corr. Factor; f) Qq >
Meter Isokinetlc Factor; \rd~l _
Assumed Moisture (%) ; •$• _
Condensate Volume (ml); *-/ _ _"
Ambient Temperature ("F) :
Record all Data Every
Minutes
Silica Gel Weight Gain(g):
Leak Rate 0iOl CFM at
T
"Hg
a I
Trav-
erse
Point
No.
Time
Samp-
ling
(rain)
Clock
Velocity
Pressure
("H20)
Scack
Temp
(T)
Dry Gas Meter
Volume
Temp(°F)
Inle
Outle t
Orifice
Pressure
Differ-
ential
("H20)
Filter
Box
Temp
CF)
Last Sampling
Imp. Train
Gas Static
Temp Pressuri.
("Hg) ,
fJUJ
r>
AT
£2.
2-3 S
532-, rz
4
/.
Z-ST;
-2,6
It,
DH/.&
76
60
017.
77
ire f
52
1-30
ts
7
US
05 L
70
2.0
ISO
60
5
1610
AT/
1,16
71
2-d
3
2-0
05
(c 0
2-0
t,
016
AVERAGE (TOTAL)
Clayton Environmental Consultants, Inc.
v
-------
APPENDIX B-2
SAMPLING SUMMARY DATA
-------
Plant /'!-'.v.;/ .. •;•'
SAMPLING SUMMARY SHEET
Loca tIon
Sampled Source ' . ' -.... / -
Run Date Np Pm Pb Vm Tm Vn,gtd ^w 1
/ - 'nr}--/\ i"). •'!'' '. •.-/.:' '//.'/••/ ,y
y 7-//)-'7\ /.:' -1 A ,?/. ??i '•'.'. £V/ -lO.'i (tti.iH 23J
3 '/••//• 7i /,.? r. / --?•/. •?•"' 'KV..V/. 77. / 4^,7C? /T.7
Run MW. MW P fc P C ^p X(Tg-f460)c Vg Tg
/ :••-. / ^,r. ,V7 & v.> >'.'/<.rC"Ur*' '"' '"' X C0* Volum'(?
0 (c.i) s).3~j£
"d
('•'."/ '7. ,V
0,'-i\c/-
d, V.-V.V
7.1
IOO.X
l/)r-). 1
//)/.!
1 P.» Static Frttturf of Stack
1 CM, In. llj
P. Stack Cn PrcuuCt, In. Hi
* Absolute
C ' fltot Tube Crefflclent
. V. Stick Cu Velocity it Slid
Condition!, fp*.
T. A»eri7« Stic* TenpiriUjrt
* -r
T( Bit Tie* ef Ttst, HU.
P- limplltvj Koilli Oltattirt 1
X I . Nrc«nt Iwl Mtle
/" / -7-7 *7 "7 ///f''
7 / / ^/e^--- '^ ' (Cfat.? 1 &
/ ^% ''1
-------
Plant
SAMPLING SUMMARY SHEET
Loca tion
V
i •
:i<
Sampled Source
Run Date Np pm ]
?b Vm
/ 7- /•;•/,)' ' /. r ."'.-.// --.-•;/
,? '/'/j-'-j:\' '/ i).i~i -i /.i * •?/.'/
•~; '/-/.?• 7,Y / •'. ,3. 5. ^'7. /'•> -* •"/ •> .
Run MWd MW P8fc P8
/ ."•:-.'.. .;>,•);< 7 A 5 '''/ .'•/
:• •' '/• Jtf.:) •"> I. .-I / ' ' :
,' ?.Y; '/,-,. JX.LI ') /, •:; ' ' •:
/765» V (P » P« \ 100 i Vy M Totil Ho.
• b rr.tj 1 1^. v on
• "»td * »„•• F_ fvenge D
«*• " Drop.
• «.Of7/«V- K . • 100 • t M P. Biroratrl
* 100 • Abiolu
VM Volur* Of
K V^ ^ Stindj
i v ,-- ,..._., MH • •
Cp V^
/A V/;;
/.' v '/.-'
/) •., .-•' •
TV V
m mstd w
•v rVy, 7 '//,/)7 /^. /
>' •'--'''/ ^r'V;? /*•/<) •"' 7/0 9
»r t,^unn rnui. VM Vo1u™» «f v«l«K Vipor Collitt
of Siir.pt ln« PoUtl wt|| |t sl(,t scf6 ^
rifle. Prtuur. *" « Hol.Ur. ky tolw.
'"' "z° Hd Holt Friction of Dry sz !"• "9* i
y.t.>«u.fnt* "/(J'iTIT* UOJ 11 dct«nMned by »wriglng tho iqutrv root of th« f
Vw 7.M Md
wgas a
^/, /^ v 7 o. ' 1 1
').?'d .V^// O > /'.)i9,7
?.//. ^.V tf, A-V o /".'••'.'. •-'
i< P., Stittc rrtuuro of Stic
11 Clt, In. II)
Pf Still CM Pretiuft, In,
* Ab:olui«
C ' Pilot Tube Crtrricltnt.
V. Stia Cit Velocity it S
(oniiltloni, fp^.
T. Artrin Stui Tcnpirilu
* 'f
Tt K«t Tin of Tttt, KU,
Pft Stapling K»i(tt 01 Mill
S I . ftrtmt Iwvimtle
i
«l
tick
It
r, f»,
'?
-A
-------
Plant
SAMPLING SUMMARY SHEET
Loca tion
si
Sampled Source /
' . I ,
Run Date Np pm
Pb vm
/ '/- /J-'/A' '. .-". -,' .'' V. .:.' '•'•: ')<'<•• ';"
:: •':-/'. '-:•: •, .?. •'> ,?'*
:, 7- /<•/. v r ••• v. '. / ,•'•'
'. ../ 5 , -7A ^i •
/ / .
Run MW. MW P . P e
Q S t S
/ ?.r//'- V). 7^ ,-'?,^;7 :'""!,.):.•<
:.) '•>. '• :> -). <-.'•') ..'"''. -\,.
•? ..„">;•' • 7 V .V," f'.\ •••) ''''A '•<)
I7t>5*v (P • P" \ 100 « vtt H Totti HO.
Cp N/^
/".', -, -7 '•
/ : • ; '.
of Stmpllng Polnti
I * "jtd tf ,. P_ Avenge trifles Pretturt
8" * Drop, ifl. |,2o
. eO.Oj-71 * YU KJ • ICO - t M PL 8irop•' :•• '//,?.//V 7" ^ /7,fa3
- ..-iv. -. ,njv; ^.v a.te
0X(T«,+460)C V T Tt
3 & ° ** t>
't /•")'/' ^1 / V /^ /"7 •'*' ^? / / ^
//.'. -j,j' ,W/i / '7t/.c? /-.C)
I;?-.1.) i ^ Jh 1 7"V / . L/-
/
V VolwNj of Witer Vipor Collects^ P.» Jtitle Pr»itur« of Slick
gif it SIP, SCF0 " cu, In. llj
X H X HoUlure by Volima > $ilt» c«t Preuurt, In, Hj
H. Hole Fncllon of Dry Cil
C* Pilot Tub* Coefficient.
X CO, VotuM X Dry
. Y. Stick Cit Velocity »t Stick
X 0, Volunx: X Dry Condi lloni, fpn.
z r \
X CO Volume X Dry ^('T^ll* ^''J7* $tlck Tcnptrllur*
m. MniPc«''ir f fight of Stttk C«»i if i S-L*-
Ory D»J|J / 3 7 V^
fM 'KoltculirWeloht of Slick / ^ 3 ^ ^i
Ciii Wrt nitll '.,-y -^ -J ^
0 f, 29,92 In. llg.
" ' / /t/'/7//'
Z9.92 tn. llg, , • •« ' ^
wined by evariclng tho tijuire root ef tSa.- '.'*>• - •' .
of t>is velocity lictd (tP») «nd th« ckwluta •) / o 6 y, -7 .
, Kit Tlr* of Tftt, KM.
' !
B Siinpllnj Koitlt OltdUr( t»»
I . Partial ItoUntUe
• O'-Cr /''/ /
—— — - •— j
slick ter.perjtyra fro-^i e»«iH
-------
Plant
SAMPLING SUMMARY SHEET
Location
J
w*
Sampled Source (• r .., . ,H ./ • /^ >••/- •••••..•••. V .-• / /
J
Run Date Np pm pb Vm
/ >-,9V^7,? /6 A 67 ,^:/7 *I1M'*>
^ .y^<;>9-7,* /<> /,7JL ?v. /; ^\:)Ll'j
*> J'- -',,,' -7X /6» A 7/ o? '/."7 7 ./(^ ~~ /).rf~l /JClL~lO 0' ' ' "•'
/7.65* V ('«. » '•» | 100 » »w H Totil Ho. of Stmpllnj Politl
• * (T « 4U)I '• * V
'• ' "ltd V., f_ Averin^Drlflci Preuur*
«** * Drop, In. M20
•"•Of7/ « "M W . • 100 - X H f. Birometrlc Prcisure, In. If,
• 100 Abtolute
Va V6tu»« Of Dry CM it Hetir
1. Avcrioe Meter Temptnturt,
'' -r
W< * H4 * " '' " V V VoUw of Dry €*» it STP,
ptt< oscr
'b-'it V.. Totil 'H,o Collected In Iif>ln»
- - - 1/2 gers ind Slllci Cel, it
uzo.8,1 cp i f *P » U. ^ A&of If. » H/J
e
* Dry ittndjrd cubic feol It b$ T,
l.OU » (T. « <(0) • Vff k Standard condition! it fcfe'F, 29.
| ..-,.- L tl(l ' '
" » 1 - • m « - '" I1 ° /<>. » IT. + WJ> 1i dcUrmlne
TV V
lm mgtd vw
^V,,^- 4n.^'S /7.J-
^5, / ^/^. 76? r-5,5. /
7/,^ ^.,y^. a ^
(Ts+460)c Vg T
JLl.ni 5553 /M
J4.33 :>>lff)^- IP
.?'/. Lf-3 / ^/-^''L/^
Vw 7.M
wgas
^..V/ /.^
/ / .? .7 6
^,/(7o /. 7
s Tt Dn
r^ ^<5 #/#7s
y.*/ /^; /v^
5,^. iaO n,r?>T'
Md
0.9 X.Z'
0. (-J7^
0 9,V7
%i
llh.h
ll(e.^
> \\3,7
\s
V Volini* of Witer Vipor CollieU* p . Stittc frenurt of Sink
911 it SIP, Str " CM, In. II]
X H X Hoi i lure by Volum* p Stnk Cit Freuurt, \«. Hi
1 Ab-.olute
H. Hole rnctlon of Dry Cil
C ' Pilot Tvb» Crttflclent.
X CO, Volvng I Dry
. V. Stick Cu Velocity it Stick
XOj Volu«XDry londlllon., fp*.
X CO Volime X Dry T| *»«r«7« $t«k Te«pinUr«
X H* Volume S Dry
Tt (III lira of Tttt, MU.
rW, Holeculir Weight of Stick 0*1* *
Ory °"U P, ' Ji«v1li>9 llouli OlmUr, tl
W Itoltculir Weight Of Stltk 1 1 ' NrtiiiUwlli-iu'
(ui, wet Bitit » • • r<1^1111 imiMtie
19.91 In, II j. . M< 9^3^'
92 In. 110, sGiL
4 by ivariglng tho iqyir« root «f tf« 3 c/ ' 7 - •' '
oln
r\
-------
SAMPLING SUMMARY SHEET
Plan*- / • . • • •• ' '
* J.ant f • . •. • •( / •. : .• , . , ,.-
Sampled Source ° "./ ,. /': ,
/
• . / /'. ;' / . <' /
Run Date Np pm pb Vm
/ ,-K,7 9-7 y i.y I. %% <'}
y./7 --/•>. XV
3 .¥-.:) <*-?][ /rL l, #9 ^?-/./7 tf'S.j'?
" V 2 ~) "7 '/ y — 1 tyr/ 1 9 '
") rv - 5 (J- / ,'\ 1 ..' 1 1 i.) (/' £X
^97 >H.^x
Run MW. MW P P
U O U O
/ .iSJ:,1/"/. ^£7$ 0.0 (s ,^.P3
/i -'^ '•/ '-' / * ^ V *i 7 A /) y ^} Q *\ ^
j ;V<--^-i; J^.^l /3./9^ ^v.-S'i
/765"» » (P » '" \ 10° * v» "p ToU1 Ko>
1 • "tld W_.. P_ Avertg". JO
«'» " Drop.
»0.Of7/ » V H. « 100 - t M p Bironelrl
1 * • " 160 " • ° Abtolu
V— Volw* of
11 H 9« r-vdll
• (ico > J* do i \« ) ^ tiw • w i s TKI»
T. Avenge K
" *r
< d 4 y Yoluma of
"lt< DSCf
%-'»» . Vw Totil'lljO
t« , 1
Pf iHJJ
* Dry sti
IjOn » {Tf » «M) • Y • SUndir
ltd • 1
CP ^
^ ,)' ?,?-
/A /;'•?.-
// rY'7:'..
Location /3o^i Ayr/, ^.f7 /^v' / C^^'i
. . . ^^2^-, ^'
, <;
TV V V 7.M MJ
m mstd w wgas d
/ 10.. n 4'+.C^ I4.X 0.-10 l.lfi fl.Wy
^ y/.O 41,05 /9.5 n. 32. 3.1 0,cil°l
;2) 7^.^ f-5. f9 V, 7 O.QL^ 0.5 ,V' . ,69/975 6 <9 /7, //&7<5 / /9 A), /
.-"/;,. 7 / ;5<1;.27 7-5 /. ,0 /9. //V7/r, /rt/H
,-^/^ , ^ ? ^ K ^ 7/0 2> 67 /9, / H 7S c/ ,1 .?
i
of S.mpllnj PoMl. V. »o1u« of Wilej fipor tollwta* P|t Stale Preuur, of Stick
V* *vjir|jvr b*»ffln4l1rl
rifle. Pretture s « H « Hol.lure by Yo'liw P StitJ C,i Pretiurt. In. H,
n u n Absolute
'"• H2° H. Hole rnctlon of Dry Oil
C ' Pilot Tube Crefflclent
] frntvnt In. I9. , - Vo1un)) , Ory P
T, StiH Ci» Velocity it Stick
Dry C«J «t Heter t 0, Volume S Dry Condi tlont, fp-t.
lonj. OCF *
,ur Te^enture, «» VoW X Dry ' T, Are;;,,, Stu» Te«per,tur,
J Mj Volumo J Dry
n» r*t »r UP T, Hit Tin of Teit, Nil.
Dry G*» It 5TP. ^ Molecular V«l9hl of Stick Oil, * .
Ory Bat'J D, ' Smvllna "otilt DI«Ur, U
Collected In lirjln- , " •
nd Silica Gel, .1 W Holeculir Weight of Stick .. *.„..* I«.»IM,I.
tut. wet Badt * • **rcwi iMkinoiie
ndjrd cubit feel ItfcftV, 29.92 In. llj. (j ^^_ *-|-Cf „!-
J condition! «l(,c>'F, 29.92 In. llj. - ^ -i(LA
t 4CO)
* pnduct of tha valocUy l>c«d (&Pt) ind tht
slick tcnperiture frcn t»ch laapllnj point.
-------
APPENDIX B-3
ASBESTQS TEST DATA SHEETS
-------
SAMPLING TRAIN DATA
Company:
Source Designation; G&£
Date: *7//t> Afi"
Gfle
77*1 Eg
Test Number;
Field Person;
Filter Number: -
i —»
Apr
Barometric Pressure ("Hg):
Stack Static pressure ("H20):
Stack Dimensions:
Plume Appearance:
Ambient Temperature(°F):
Record all Data Every
J,. 5
Minutes
Filter Heater Setting;
Probe Heater Setting;
Nozzle Number;/£/ ,Dia.(in.);
Pitot Tube No ._^/ ,Corr.Factor;
Meter Box Noy^C. / > Corr. Factor: /.QCQI
Meter Isokinetic Factor:
Assumed Moisture(%); / ^«
Condensate Volume(ml);
Silica Gel Weight Gain(g):
Leak Rate o n^*& CFM at
"Hg
Trav-
erse
Point
No.
£A
3
2_
Time
Samp-
ling
(rain)
0°
?.*•
7rC?
Clock
/S3J1
/£?5>
/5~37
Velocity
Pressure
("H20)
AO^'
" /.d>£-
AVERAGE (TOTAL)'
Stack
Temp
(°F)
•^°^
^6
^&
j
Dry Gas Meter
Vo lume
(ft3)
.2^5^/9
«z^. ;?3c>
<2£ X
^ w-
Temp (°F)
Inlet
fiV)
r>
;:0
Outle t
^?
>?
Ti
Orifice
Pressure
Differ-
ential
("H20)
U.&
i
V.9
/
4,9;
Filter
Box
Temp
(°F)
t
Last
Imp .
Gas
Temp
(°F)
Samp ling
Train
Static
Pressure
("Hg)
//,0
//.o
•-•'.:
Clayton Environmental Consultants, Inc-.
-------
SAMPLING TRAIN DATA
ignati<
In hi
Company:
Source Designation:
Date: _
Test Number:
Field Person:_
Filter Number:
*f_
Dlf.f^f>
Barometric Pressure ("Hg):
Stack Static Pressure
Stack Dimensions: (L
Plume Appearance:
("
r /'
g?
Filter Heater Setting;
Probe Heater Setting; -
Nozzle Number ;^
> > Pia. (in. ) :
Pitot Tube No.^/ , Corr. Factor ;,
Meter Box No./^.c , Corr. Fact on
Meter Isokinetic Factor;
Assumed Moisture (%): /.
Condensate Volume (ml): •— *
Ambient Temperature (°F) :
Record all Data Every
Minutes
Silica Gel Weight Gain(g):
Leak Rate /? coe? CFM at
Trav
erse
Point
No.
E2
3-
\
Time
Samp-
ling
(min)
O
•?~r
•7.0
Clock
/Qrf
tflte
/^2C
Velocity
Pres sure
("H20)
/-/
' /-/
AVERAGE (TOTAL)
Stack
Temp
C°F)
^
9^
Dry Gas Meter
Vo lume
(ft3)
v/^/<^?
4//S-65^
-Va/. / 77
( p,,;K )
Temp (°F)
Inlet
^
^
\¥>
Outle t
?^
?i
- » ' '
?^-
Orifice
Pressure
Differ.
ential
C"H20)
f*(.'V
/„ 6^
! .i-?':?
Filter
Box
Temp
(°F)
— —
•
Last
Imp .
Gas
Temp
CF)
—
—
SamplingT
Train—'
Static
Pressun
("Hg)
?.o
S0.z>
Clayton Environmental Consultants, Inc.
-------
Company;
SAMPLING TRAIN DATA
4/
Source Designation; &e£
^ III fa
Ail/V;^
Date :
•a.
Test Number:_
Field Person:_
Filter Numbers
Barometric Pressure ("Hg) :
Stack Static Pressure ("HgO): +,
Stack Dimensions; fc/ " ^Jj^ •
Plume Appearance :
Ambient Temperature(°F):
Record all Data Every ;
•f
O CFM at
, 7
"Hg
Trav-
erse
Point
No.
£f,2
2-
Time
Samp-
ling
(rain)
o
z.g
?--o
Clock
;v.?7
/VV^.s
/^yy
Velocity
Pres sure
("H20)
/.Of
- A^i"
AVERAGE (TOTAL)
Stack
Temp
(°F)
^
gt"
Dry Gas Meter
Vo lume
(ft3)
Ulf.WJ
Ll2*i.£>/i>
Ha.L.s-fc
6. '. -\
.0?^)
Temp(°F)
Inlet
36
/#>
^
Outle t
?/
1^-
-11,6
Orifice
Pressure
Differ-
ential
("H90)
/. (*
(,(?
\ . U'
Filter
Box
Temp
(°F)
.
- -
— •
"
Last
Imp.
Gas
Temp
(°F)
• —
—
•— — •
Samp ling
Train
Static
Pressure
("HB)
6. o
&.o
Clayton Environmental Consultants, Inc.
-------
SAMPLING TRAIN DATA
Company:
Source Designation:
Date : +j t
Test Number:
Field Person; /JO-* jgjt
Filter Number; .AQ,^*.
Barometric Pressure ("Hg):
Stack Static Pressure ('
Stack Dimensions; hl"
Plume Appearance:
& - <£
CA&- £>UMP
Ambient Temperature (°?) ; *JO*_
Record all Data Every ^. ^"
Filter Heater Setting: ^
Probe Heater Setting; —
Nozzle Number; ^/fe ,Dia.(ii
Pitot Tube No. g/ , Corr . Factor \^_
Meter Box No./^^/ , Corr. Factor;/,^
Meter Isokinetic Factor:
Assumed Moisture(%): ^
Condensate Volume(ml): —
Silica Gel Weight Gain(g); J. 5
Minutes Leak
CFM at
Trav-
erse
Point
No.
&Z
3-
Time
Samp-
ling
(rain)
O
l.s
7,o
Clock
/Y^r?
i$&A
/£-£<*
Velocity
Pressure
("H20)
'1.6*
- I./
AVERAGE (TOTAL)
Stack
Temp
C°F>
^
tf
Dry Gas Meter
Vo lume
(ft3)
V^-?/^
Hrf.liv
*4*L%.$io
( ^ 03ri)
Temp(°F)
Inlet
^
/GO
<\1>
Outle t
?/
?l
M!
Orifice
Pressure
Differ-
ential
("H20)
/.c,
l,<*^
l.lc
Filter
Box
Temp
(°F)
—
—
^ .
Last
Imp.
Gas
Temp
CF)
—
—
Sampling
Train
Static
Pressura
("Hg) .
v.o
1.0
Clayton Environmental Consultants, Inc.
-------
SAMPLING TRAIN DATA
Company;
Source Designation:
Date: *yf/A_h&'
Test Number;
Field Person;
Filter Number; &*C*sg.
Barometric Pressure ("Hg):
Stack Static Pressure ("H00):
/ /^" H
Stack Dimensions ; /fi
Plume Appearance:
Ambient Temperature(°F):
Record all Data Every
Minutes
Filter Heater Setting;
Probe Heater Sett
Nozzle Number :_/g^_,Dia. (in. );
Pitot Tube No.^ , Corr . Factor ;,
Meter Box No y^C1/_ > Corr.
Meter Isokinetic Factor;
Assumed Moisture(%):
Condensate Volume(ml):
Silica Gel Weight Gain(g); //, /
Leak Rate f),Q&& CFM at )S"
"Hg
Trav-
erse
Point
No.
5^oj.v
3
Time
Samp-
ling
(min)
0
5"
10
Clock
l<&
j&l
/S-3t
Velocity
Pres sure
("H20)
'•/
\M
AVERAGE (TOTAL)
Stack
Temp
(°F)
-.//r
i/^
Dry Gas Meter
Vo lume
(ft3)
V2^y??
W,9S>
*/^/.sst
(3-^&)
Temp(°F)
Inlet
n*
•?t
. -\ -;';i
«y\^-
Outle t
7^
?V
15
Orifice
Pressure
Differ-
ential
("H20)
.^/
, iO
«
i9:?/
Filter
Box
Temp
(°F)
Last
Imp .
Gas
Temp
(°F)
Sampling
Train
Static
Pre ssure
("Hg)
/.o
r?.0
Clayton Environmental Consultants, Inc.
-------
SAMPLING 'TRAIN DATA
Company:
Source Desi
Date: "7
ation;
Test Number:
Field Person:__
Filter Number:
Barometric Pressure ("Hg):
Stack Static Pressure ("H,0):
Stack Dimensions; /Q ' <
Plume Appearance:
Ambient Temperature(°F):
Record all Data Every
Filter Heater Setting;
Probe Heater Setting;
Nozzle Number;
, /
Minutes
,Dia.(in.):
Pitot Tube No.g/ ,Corr.Factor;
Meter Box No.PAC, / » Corr
Meter Isokinetic Factor:
Assumed Moisture (7.) :
Condensate Volume(ml):
Silica Gel Weight Gain(g):
Leak Rate d.f-^o-D CFM at /5;
"H
Trav-
erse
Point
No.
Su>>?
.3
Time
Samp-
ling
(min)
o
^r
/o
Clock
1(9(1
Koil
t(*tf
Velocity
Pressure
C"H20)
o.^i
•0',%$
0.97
AVERAGE (TOTAL)
Stack
Temp
(°F)
IQ$
10 5
U*>
Dry Gas Meter
Volume
(ft3)
WlfllD
WAM
Temp(°F)
Inlet
1k>
$+
ko
' *> <"
W i *~:
^).''-
Outle t
n
%(o
w
S) /
is /
\' I ,
<< u
Orifice
Pressure
Differ-
ential
("H20)
O.M)
o.t^
0^
o>yo
Filter
Box
Temp
(°F)
Last
Imp.
Gas
Temp
(°F)
Sampling!
Train
Static
Pressure!
("Hg) '
-------
SAMPLING TRAIN DATA
Company; Pfe^
Source Designation:
Date: -7 //.
Test Number;
Field Person; flUJ
Filter Numb e r ; •
Barometric Pressure ("Hg) ;
Stack Static Pressure ("HgO):
Stack Dimensions; /&"
Plume Appearance :
Filter Heater Setting;
Probe Heater Setting;
Nozzle Number :_^^, Pi a. (in. ) ; ,.
Pitot Tube No . J&_, Cor r . Factor ;«.
Meter Box
/ , Corr. Factor;/,^/
/.
Ambient Temperature (°F):
Record all Data Every ^
Minutes
Meter Isokinetic Factor ;
Assumed Mois tur e (%) :
Condensate Volume(ml):
Silica Gel Weight Gain(g); A
Leak Rate ()
CFM at
"Hg
Trav-
erse
Point
No.
$(*>3
J>
Time
Samp-
ling
(min)
0
s-
I'D
Clock
/0°&
/Ott
10)%
Velocity
Pr es sure
("H20)
/ t-/
O'G'
a 0 O
AVERAGE (TOTAL)
Stack
Temp
^
q?
Dry Gas Meter
Vo lume
(ft3)
iT~ rv
v O
O 1
Orifice
Pressure
Differ-
ential
("H20)
'-5*^
.oio
DM
Filter
Box
Temp
Last
Imp.
Gas
Temp
Sampling
Train
Static
Pressure
("Hg)
c2,0
^0
Clayton Environmental Consultants, Inc.
-------
SAMPLING TRAIN DATA
Company:
Source Designation:
Date: ^//Jt
_
/'g 7*0^ " /
C
Test Number:_
Field Person:
Filter Number:^
Barometric Pressure ("Hg):
Stack Static Pressure ("H20):
Stack Dimensions:
Plume Appearance:
Filter Heater Setting; —
Probe Heater Setting:
Nozzle Number ;y/6 , Dia. (in. ) ;
Pitot Tube No. ?/ , Corr . Factor :
, Corr.
Ambient Temperature(°F):£?
Record all Data Every
Minutes
Meter Box N
Meter Isokinetic Factor ; l~7 &
Assumed Moisture (%) :_J2.
Condensate Volume(ml):
Silica Gel Weight Gain(g); «
Leak Rate /^ ^ /7 CFM at
H
Trav-
erse
Point
No.
U?^
^
Time
Samp-
ling
(min)
a
3.JT
7.0
Clock
•20J5-
Joy/.-S'
2.0 ^>
Velocity
Pressure
C"H20)
,t,sr
<-?2
AVERAGE (TOTAL)
Stack
Temp
(°F)
O
75'
V
Dry Gas Meter
Vo lume
(ft3)
477 2?A
G7i«27
Clayton Environmental Consultants, Inc.
-------
SAMPLING TRAIN DATA
/.
Company:
Source Designation:
Date: ^
V
Test Number ; /4s£fe3rOS ~
Field Person;
Filter Number :•
Filter Heater Setting:
Probe Heater Setting:
Nozzle Number :j^^_, Dia. (in. ) :^,
Barometric Pressure ("Hg):
Stack Static Pressure ("H90):
Stack Dimensions:
Plume Appearance:
Ambient Temperature (°F) :
Record all Data Every
Minutes
Pitot Tube No. ^/ , Corr. Factor ;
Meter Box No .f*f)C I > Corr . Factor; / go/
Meter Isokinetic Factor ; /
Assumed Moisture(%); ^ ^
Condensate Volume(ml):
Silica Gel Weight Gain(g):
Leak Rate £.6oO CFM at
Trav-
erse
Point
No.
\u3
3
Time
Samp-
ling
(min)
O
1£
70
Clock
2O-S~^
ZL/ao.
Velocity
Pressure
("H20)
t Y^f
^ 'Jjg
AVERAGE (TOTAL)
Stack
Temp
?£°
>crf
Dry Gas Meter
Vo lume
(ft3)
& L W
trtyvo
(,?$-.&c
(3.^1)
Temp(°F)
Inlet
7y
$&
|