&EPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards
Research Triangle Park NC 27711
EMB Report 78-NMM-8
March 1979
Air
Clay
Emission Test Report
Georgia Kaolin
Dry Branch, Georgia
-------
SOURCE EMISSIONS TEST REPORT
GEORGIA KAOLIN COMPANY
Dry Branch Georgia
#8 Raymond Impact Mill
and
Roller Mills
ROY F. WESTON, INC.
Lb.O'/LM
V. D. O'Neill
Assistant Project Scientist
Barry Lr
Supervisor Air Testing
RFW REPORT NO. 0300-81-06
CONTRACT NO. 62-02-2816
WORK ASSIGNMENT NO. 5
Prepared by:
ROY F. WESTON, INC.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS-DESIGNERS
Weston Way
West Chester, Pennsylvania 19380
(215) 692-3030
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
List of Tables and Figures i, ii
Summary 1
Introduction 3
Description of Test Locations 5
No. 8 Raymond Impact Mill Baghouse Exhaust Stack 5
No. 8 Raymond Impact Mill Baghouse Inlet Duct . 5
Roller Mills Baghouse Exhaust Stack 5
Roller Mills Baghouse Inlet Duct 5
Description of Sampling Trains 11
Particulate Sampling Trains 11
Particle .Sizing Train 13
Test Procedures 15
Preliminary Tests 15
No. 8 Raymond Impact Mill Baghouse Exhaust Stack 15
No. 8 Raymond Impact Mill Baghouse Inlet Duct 16
Roller Mills Baghouse Exhaust Stack 16
Roller Mills Baghouse Inlet Duct 17
Analytical Procedures 18
Particulate Sample Recovery 18
Particulate Analyses 18
Particle Size Sample Recovery and Analyses jg
Discussion of Test Results 20
t
Appendix A - Raw Test Data
Appendix B - Laboratory Reports
Appendix C - Sample Calculations
Appendix D - Equipment Calibration Data
Appendix E - Project Participants *
Appendix F - Operations Log
-------
LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES
TABLE
NO. TfTLE PAGE
1 #8 Raymond Impact Mill Baghouse Inlet 21
Summary of Test Data
2 #8 Raymond Impact Mill Baghouse Exhaust 22
Summary of Test Data
3 Roller Mills Baghouse Inlet 23
Summary of Test Data
4 Roller Mills Baghouse Exhaust 2k
Summary of Test Data
5 #8 Raymond Impact Mill Baghouse Inlet 25
Summary of Test Results
6 #8 Raymond Impact Mill Baghouse Exhaust 26
Summary of Test Results
7 Roller Mills Baghouse Inlet 27
Summary of Test Results
8 Roller Mills Baghouse Exhaust 28
Summary of Test Results
9 #8 Raymond Impact Mill Baghouse Exhaust 29
Particle Size Distribution
10 Roller Mi 11 Baghouse Exhaust 31
Particle Size Distribution
11 Roller Mill Baghouse Exhaust 33
Visible Emission Test 1
12 Roller Mill Baghouse Exhaust 34
Visible Emission Test 2
13 Roller Mill Baghouse Exhaust 35
Visible Emission Test 3
1A #8 Raymond Impact Mill Baghouse Exhaust 36
Visible Emission Test 1
-------
FIGURE
NO. TITLE PAGE
1 #8 Raymond Impact Mill Baghouse Exhaust 6
Port and Sampling Potnt Locations
2 #8 Raymond Impact Mill Baghouse Inlet 1 7
Port and Sampling Point Locations
3 Roller Mills Baghouse Exhaust 8
Port and Sampling Pomt Locations
k Roller Mill Baghouse Inlet 10
Port and Sampling Point Locations
5 Particulate Sampling Train 12
EPA Method 5 - Mfsco.
6 Particulate Sampling Train 14
EPA Method 5
7 #8 Raymond Impact Mill Baghouse Inlet 30
Particle Size Distribution
8 Roller Mills Baghouse Inlet 32
Particle Size Distribution
i i
-------
SUMMARY
The Emission Measurement Branch of the U. S. Environmental Protection
Agency contracted Roy F. Weston, Inc. to conduct a source testing
and analysis program at the Georgia Kaolin Company's Dry Branch,
Georgia clay processing facility.
The primary objective of the testing program was to measure the
particulate emissions to the atmosphere from two baghouse-control led
sources at the plant (No. 8 Raymond Impact MM 1 and Roller Mills).
This objective was completed by performing a series of three particulate
tests utilizing EPA Method 5 procedures at each baghouse exhaust stack
s
location. In addition, visual determinations of plume opacities were
made simultaneously with each particulate test at both source discharge
(2)
points according to EPA Method 9 protocol. Also, similar EPA Method 5
particulate and Anderson cascade impactor tests were executed at both
baghouse inlet sites to measure the emissions and the particle size
distribution of the particulate matter entering the bag collectors.
The particulate matter emission results are summarized below:.
No. 8 Raymond Impact Mill Baghouse Exhaust Stack
Test Particulate Concentration Particulate Emission Rate
No. Date _ Grains/DSCF _ _ Pounds/Hour _
1 12/6/78 0.020 2.49
2 < 12/6/78 0.012 1.5^
3 12/6/78 0^016 2.01
Series Average 2.01
No. 8 Raymond Impact Mill Baghouse Inlet Duct
Test Particulate Concentration Particulate Emission Rate
No. Date _ Grains/DSCF _ _ Pounds/Hour _
1 12/6/78 k.53 5*ป5.
- 1 -
(!)Code of Federal Regulations, Title kO, Part 60, Appendix A, "Standards of
Performance for New Stationary Sources," August 18, 1977-
Federal Register, Vol. 39, No. 219, November 12,
' 'Run performed simultaneously with Test Number 2 at exhaust stack.
-------
Roller Mills Baghouse Exhaust Stack
Test Particulate Concentration Partfculate Emission Rate
No. Date Grains/DSCF ' Pounds/Hour
1 12/5/78 0.010 0.73
2 12/5/78 0.005 0.38
3 12/6/78 0.007 0.48
Series Average 0.53
Roller Mills Baghouse tnlet Duct
Test Date Partfculate Concentration Partfculate Emission Rate
No. Date Grafns/DSCF Pounds/Hour
1 12/6/78 1.76 105.
The particulate removal efficiency of No. 8 Raymond Impact Mill Baghouse was
measured at 99-72%, that of the Roller Mills was 99-54%. Both efficiencies
were calculated based on one simultaneous tnlet/outlet test only.
No visible emissions were observed from either stack durfng the test program
with the exception of test run one at the Roller Mills exhaust stack where a
maximum of 5% opacity was observed.
Figures 7 and 8 illustrate the particle size distribution of the particulate
matter at the baghouse inlet locations.
Detailed summaries of test data and test results are presented in Tables 1
through 8 of this report.
- 2 -
(U
Run performed simultaneously with Test Number 3 at exhaust stack.
-------
INTRODUCTION
The Emission Measurement Branch of the U. S. Environmental Protection
Agency contracted Roy F. Weston, Inc. to conduct a source testing and
analysis program at the Georgia Kaolin Company's Dry Branch, Georgia
clay processing facility. The objective of the testing program was to
measure various emission parameters from two milling operations at the
plant.
The locations tested, plus the number and types of tests performed at
each site, are listed below:
1. No. 8 Raymond Impact Mill Baghouse Exhaust Stack
a. Three particulate tests by EPA Method 5.
b. One opacity test by EPA Method 9 simultaneous with Run One
particulate test.
2. No. 8 Raymond Impact Mill Baghouse Inlet Duct
a. One particulate test by EPA Method 5 simultaneous with one
of the exhaust stack tests.
b. One particle size distribution test by cascade impaction
D
(Anderson ).
3. Roller Mills Baghouse Exhaust Stack
a. Three particulate tests by EPA Method 5.
b> Three opacity tests by EPA Method 9 simultaneous with
each particulate test.
k. Roller Mills Baghouse Inlet Duct
a. One particulate test by EPA Method 5 simultaneous with
one of the exhaust stack tests.
b. One particle size distribution test by cascade impaction
^
(Anderson ).
- 3 -
-------
All tests were conducted during the period 5"6 December 1978 by Weston
personnel and were observed by Mr. Dennis P. Holzschuh, EPA Technical
Manager.
Test data and test result summaries are presented in Tables 1 through 8
of this report. Particle size distribution results are shown in Figures 7
and 8. Also incorporated herein ts a description of the test locations,
test equipment, test procedures, sample recovery, and analytical methods
used during the test program. Raw test data, laboratory reports, sample
calculations, equipment calTbratTon data, a list of project participants
and process operation logs are provided in Appendtces A through F,
respectively.
- k -
-------
DESCRIPTION OF TEST LOCATIONS
No. 8 Raymond Impact Mill Baghouse Exhaust Stack
Two V I.D. test ports, 90 apart, were installed on a straight section of
the 26" I.D. metal stack at a location 5-8 stack diameters (150M) downstream
and 1.5 diameters (AO") upstream from the nearest flow disturbances. EPA
Method 1 criteria for this test locatfon requfred a minimum of 28 traverse
points. A total of 32 traverse points (16 per axts) were sampled since
this number conveniently related to the desired test period length, See
Figure 1 for port and samplfng point locations.
No. 8 Raymond Impact Mill Baghouse Inlet Duct
Two V I.D. test ports were placed at right angles on a straight section
of the 32" I.D. ductwork leading to the inlet of the baghouse at a
position greater than eight stack dfameters downstream, and greater
than two diameters upstream from the nearest gas stream flow disturbances.
Since the eight and two diameter crfterion were met a minimum of twelve
traverse points were required by EPA Method 1 regulations. Figure 2
illustrates port and sampling point locations.
Roller Mills Baghouse Exhaust Stack
Two V I.D. test ports at 90 were placed on the 2V I.D. metal stack
5-5 diameters downstream and 2.2 diameters upstream from the nearest
flow disturbances. Twenty sampling points (10 per axis) were selected
for testing. See Figure 3 for port and sampling point locations.
Roller Mills Baghouse Inlet Duct
Two V I.D. test ports, 90 apart, were installed in a straight section
of the metal duct at a location which was 3.0 duct diameters downstream
- 5 -
-------
GEORGIA KAOLIN COMPANY
Dry Branch,Georgia
FIGURE 1
#8 RAYMOND IMPACT MILL BAGHOUSE EXHAUST
PORT AND SAMPLING POINT LOCATIONS
40"
Port X
DUCT CROSS-SECTIONAL VIEW
Port Y
150"
Traverse
Point
Number
1
2
3
If
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Distance from
Inside Near
Wai 1 , Inches
3/8
1-1/4
2-1 A
3-1A
4-3/8
5-3A
7-3/8
9-3/4
16-1/4
18-5/8
20-1/4
21-5/8
22-3/4
23-3/4
24-3/4
25-5/8
O
- 6 -
-------
GEORGIA KAOLIN COMPANY
Dry Branch,Georgia
FIGURE 2
#8 Raymond Impact M.i 11 Bag house Inlet
Port arid Samplirig Point Locations
22'
n x
Gas Flow
, From
Cyclone
O
To
Baghouse
32" I.D.
32" I.D
Traverse
Point
Number
1
2
3
iป
5
6
Port Y
DUCT CROSS - SECTIONAL VIEW
Distance From
Inside Near
Wai 1, Inches
1-3/8
4-5/8
9-1/2
22-1/2
27-3/8
30-5/8
- 7 -
-------
GEORGIA KAOLIN COMPANY
Dry Branch,Georgia
FIGURE 3
ROLLER MILLS BAGHOUSE EXHAUST
PORT AND SAMPLING POINT LOCATIONS
Port X
DUCT CROSS-SECTIONAL VIEW
Traverse
Point
Number
1
2
. 3
k
S
6
7
8
9
10
Distance From
Inside Near
Wai 1 , Inches
5/8
2
3-1/2
5-1/2
8-1 A
15-3 A
18-1/2
20-1/2
22
23-3/8
52"
Port Y
n
132"
o
roof
From
Baghouse
- 8 -
-------
and 1.0 diameters upstream from the nearest flow disturbances. A total of
28 points were selected for test purposes, 1A per port axis. Figure k
illustrates port and traverse point distances.
- 9 -
-------
GEORGIA KAOLIN COMPANY
Dry Branch,Georgia
FIGURE *ป
ROLLER MILLS BAGHOUSE INLET
PORT AND SAMPLING POINT LOCATIONS
I D
FAN
To Baghouse
17-3/8" _LJL
Port X
Port Y
Traverse
Point
Number
1
2
3
It
S
6
7
8
9.
10
11
12
13
14
Distance From
Inside Near
Wai 1 , Inches
1/2
1
1-3/4
2-1/2
3-1/2
4-5/8
6-3/8
11
12-3/4
13-7/8
14-7/8
15-5/8
16-3/8
16-7/8
DUCT CROSS SECTIONAL VIEW
- 10 -
-------
DESCRIPTION OF SAMPLING TRAINS
Participate Sampling Trains
The test train utilized for participate sampling at both fnlet duct locations
and at #8 Raymond Impact Mill Baghouse exhaust stack location was the standard
EPA Method 5 train (see Figure 5).
A stainless steel nozzle was attached to a heated (^ 250 F) borosilicate glass
probe which was connected directly to a borosilTcate filter holder containing a
V Reeve Angel 900 AG glass fiber filter. The filter holder was maintained at
approximately 250 F in a heated chamber, and was connected by Tygon vacuum
tubing to the first of four Greenburg-Smith impingers which were included in
the train to condense the moisture in the gas stream. Each of the first two
impingers contained 100 ml of distilled water, the third was dry and the final
impinger contained 200 grams of dry pre-weighed silica gel. The first, third,
and fourth impingers were modified Greenburg-Smith type; the second was a
standard Greenburg-Smith impinger. All impingers were maintained in a crushed
ice bath. A RAC control console with vacuum pump, dry gas meter, a calibrated
orifice, and inclined manometers completed the sampling train.
Flue gas temperature was measured by means of a Type K thermocouple which was
connected to a direct readout pyrometer. The thermocouple sensor was positioned
adjacent to the sampling nozzle.
Gas velocity was measured using a calibrated "S" type pitot tube provided with
A
extensions and fastened alongside the sampling probe. Gas stream composition
(carbon dioxide, oxygen, and carbon monoxide content) was determined utilizing
Orsat apparatus to analyze stack gas samples. Gas stream composition proved
to be ambient air since no combustion products were found in any of the stack
gas effluent samples.
- 11
-------
0.75 TO 1 in.
I TtlVU
-A ^X
TEMPERATURE SENSOR
K.
. PROBE
\
> 0.75 in.
f
TEMPERATURE CONTROLLED
HEATED AREA
THERMOMETER
PITOT TUBE
TEMPERATURE SENSOR
/
PROBE \
V V
STACK WALL
REVERSE-TYPE
PITOT TUBE
PITOT MANOMETER
ORIFACE
CHECK VALVE
THERMOMETERS
\
DRY GAS METER
AIR TIGHT PUMP
VACUUM
LINE
FIGURE 5 PARTICIPATE SAMPLING TRAIN
EPA METHODS - Ml SCO
-------
The test train used for participate sampling at the Roller Mills Exhaust
Stack was identical to the train described above except a rigid glass
connector was used between the back half of the filter holder and the
first impinger. (See Figure 6.)
Particle Size Distribution Sampling Apparatus
n
A stainless steel nozzle was connected directly to an 8-stage Anderson cascade
impaction device which separated the particles according to their effective
aerodynamic particle dfamters. A glass fiber filter was used to capture any
particles that passed through the tmpactor substrates to permit the measurement
of total particulate. The filter holder was maintained at stack temperature
^
and was connected by Tygon vacuum tubing to the first of four Greenburg-Smfth
impingers which were included in the train to condense the moisture in the gas
stream. All impingers were maintained in a crushed Tee bath. A RAC control
console with vacuum pump, dry gas meter, a calibrated oriffce, and inclined
manometers completed the sampling train.
- 13 -
-------
TEMPERATURE
SENSOR
THERMOMETER
CHECK VALVE
VACUUM LINE
,VACUUM GUAGE
THERMOMETERS
REVERSE TYPE
PITOT TUBE
PITOT MANOMETER
IMPINGERS
ICE BATH
ORIFICE
AND
MANOMETER
DISTILLED WATER
FIGURE 6 PARTICULATE SAMPLING TRAIN-ERA METHOD 5
-------
TEST PROCEDURES
PrelIminary Tests
Preliminary test data was obtained at each sampling location. Stack geometry
measurements were recorded and sampling point distances calculated. A pre-
liminary velocity traverse was performed at each test location utilizing a
calibrated "S" type pitot tube and a Dwyer Inclined manometer to determine
velocity profiles. Stack gas temperatures were observed with a direct
read-out pyrometer equipped with a chrome1-alumel thermocouple. Moisture
content values were estimated from information supplied by Georgia Kaolin.
Preliminary test data was used for nozzle sizing and nomagraph set-up for
isokinetic sampling procedures.
Calibration of the probe nozzles, pitot tubes, metering systems, probe heaters,
temperature gauges and barometer were performed as specified In Section 5 of
EPA Method 5 test procedures (see Appendix D for calibration data).
No. 8 Raymond Impact Mill Baghouse Exhaust Stack
A series of three tests were conducted at No. 8 Raymond Impact Mill Baghouse
Exhaust Stack to measure the concentration and mass rate of particulate
matter emissions. Thirty-two traverse points, 16 per port axis, were sampled
for three minutes each resulting in a total test time of ninety-six minutes.
During particulate sampling, gas stream velocities were measured by inserting a
calibrated "S" type pitot tube into the stream adjacent to the sampling nozzle.
The velocity pressure differential was observed immediately after positioning
the nozzle at each point, and sampling rates were adjusted to maintain isokinetic
sampling. Stack gas temperatures were also monitored at each point with the
pyrometer and thermocouple. Additional temperature measurements were made at
the final impinger, inlet and outlet of the dry gas meter and at the
filter holder chamber.
- 15 -
-------
Test data was recorded every three minutes at each point during all test periods.
Leak checks were performed according to EPA Method 5 instructions prior to and
after each run and/or component change. Table 2 presents a summary of test
data for each of the three runs. Visible emissions observations were recorded
with Test Run 1 only due to lack of daylight during the other test periods.
Observations were performed by a certified observer according to EPA Method 9
procedures. See Table 6 for result summary.
No. 8 Raymond Impact Mill Baghouse Inlet Duct
One EPA Method 5 test was performed at the inlet simultaneous with particulate
Test Run 2 at the outlet. Twelve points were traversed, 6 per port axis, for
5 minutes, each yielding a test period 60 minutes in length.
Procedures for isokinetic sampling were identical for those described for the
outlet location except the test data was recorded every 5 minutes. Test data
and test result summaries are provided in Tables 1 and 5, respectively.
One sampling point located at a site of average velocity was selected from
particulate traverse data for particle size distribution testing. The gas
stream was sampled isokinetically at that point for 5 minutes which permitted
collection of sufficient sample for analysis without overloading the filter
substrates. Sample volume, temperature, and pressure data was recorded
before and after the test. See Figure 7 for a distribution plot.
Roller Mills Baghouse Exhaust Stack
t
Three 120 minute Method 5 test runs were performed at the baghouse outlet. A
total of 20 points were sampled for 6 minutes each per test. Readings were
taken at 3 minute intervals.
Procedures for isokinetic sampling were identical to those described for
No. 8 Raymond Impact Mill Baghouse Exhaust Stack.
- 16 -
-------
See Tables k and 8 for test data and test result summaries respectively.
Visual determinations of plume opacity were performed by a certified observer
according to Method 9 Procedures. A summary of results is presented in
Table 8.
Roller Mills Baghouse Inlet Duct
One Method 5 test was performed at the inlet simultaneous with particulate Test
Run 3 at the outlet. Twenty-eight points were traversed, 1*t per port axis, for
2 minutes each yielding a test period of 56 minutes.
Isokinetfc sampling procedures were identical to those previously described
except that test data was recorded every 2 minutes. Table 3 shows test data
summarization and Table 7 presents test results.
One particle size distribtuion sample was collected isokinetically at a point
of average velocity over a 3 minute period. Sample volume, temperature, and
pressure data was recorded before and after the test. See Figure 8 for
distribution results.
- 17 -
-------
ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
Particulate Sample Recovery
At the conclusion of each test, the sampling trains were dismantled, openings
sealed, and the components transported to the field laboratory. Sample in-
tegrity was assured by maintaining chain of custody records which will be
supplied upon request.
A consistent procedure was employed for sample recovery:
The glass fiber filter(s) was removed from its holder with
tweezers and placed in its original container (petri dish),
along with any loose particulate and filter fragments (Sample l).
The probe (EPA 5) and nozzle were separated and the internal
particulate rinsed with acetone into a borosilicate container
while brushing a minimum of three times until no visible
particles remained. Particulate adhering to the brush was
rinsed with acetone into the same container. The front half
of the filter holder was rinsed with acetone while brushing
a minimum of three times. The rinses were combined (Sample 2)
and the container sealed with a Teflon lined closure.
The total liquid in impingers one, two and three was measured,
the value recorded, and the liquid discarded.
The silica gel was removed from the last impinger and immediately
weighed.
An acetone sample was retained for blank analysis.
Particulate Analyses
The filters (Sample 1) and any loose fragments were desiccated for 2k hours and
weighed to the nearest 0.1 milligram to a constant weight.
The acetone wash samples (Sample 2) were evaporated at ambient temperature and
pressure in tared beakers, and desiccated to constant weight. All sample residue
weights were adjusted by the acetone blank value.
- 18 -
-------
The weight of the material collected on the glass fiber filter(s) plus the
weight of the resfdue of the acetone nozzle/probe/front-half filter holder
washes represents the "total" EPA Method 5 catch. Complete laboratory results
are presented in Appendtx B of this report.
Particle Size Sample Recovery and Analyses
The cascade impactor substrates and any loose fragments were carefully removed
from their support plates with tweezers and placed in individual containers
(petri dishes) for shipment to the Weston Laboratory.
Each cascade impactor filter was fired at 525 C and pre-weighed to the nearest
0.1 milligram to constant weight at Weston's Laboratory prior to on-site
application. Subsequent to emissions exposure, the cascade impactor substrates,
back-up filters and any loose fragments were desiccated for 2k hours in the
Laboratory and weighed to the nearest 0.1 milligram to constant weight.
- 19 -
-------
DISCUSSION OF TEST RESULTS
Particulate test data and test result summaries are presented in Tables 1
through 10 of this report. Figures 7 and 8 illustrate the particle size
distribution of the particulate matter at the baghouse inlet locations.
No unusual sampling difficulties were encountered during the test periods,
but it should be noted that the two tests performed at the #8 Raymond
Impact Mill Baghouse on December 5, 1978 had to be repeated due to a
malfunction in the mechanical collector which resulted in an abnormally
high particulate loading on the baghouse which invalidated the two tests.
The particulate removal efficiency of No. 8 Raymond Impact Mill Baghouse
was measured at 99-72%; that of the Roller Mills was 99.5^%. Both
efficiencies were calculated on one simultaneous inlet/outlet test
only.
ft
Results of the Anderson cascade impactor particle size distribution
tests at both inlet locations show that _>_ 35% of the particles entering
each baghouse were >^ 1.0 microns in diameter.
Determination of visual opacity at the #8 Raymond Impact Mill Baghouse
resulted in no visible emissions observed with the exception of the first
test; similar observations of 0% opacity were made at the Roller Mill
Baghouse. The first test at this location resulted in readings averaging
5% opacity.
The results of visible emission testing at both sites are summarized in
Tables 11 through 1A.
- 20 -
-------
GEORGIA KAOLIN COMPANY
Dry Branch, Georgia
TABLE 1
#8 Raymond Impact Mill Baghouse Inlet
Summary of Test Data
Teat Data
Test Number '
Test Date 12-6-78
Test Period 1615-1723
SampI Ing Data
Sampling Duration, minutes 60.0
Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.188
Barometric Pressure, inches mercury 29.98
Average Orifice Pressure Differential, inches water 0.85
Average Dry Gas Temperature at Meter, F 81.
Sample Volume at Meter Conditions, cubic feet 29-55
Sample Volume at Standard Conditions, ' cubic feet 28.64
Gas Stream Moisture Content
Total Water Collected by Train, ml 'tS.S
Standard Volume of Water Collected, cubic feet 2.28'
Moisture in Gas Stream, percent by volume 7-''
Mole Fraction of Dry Gas 0.926
Gas Stream Composition
C02, percent by volume 0.0
02, percent by volume 20.9
CO, percent by volume 0.0
N2, percent by volume 79.1
Molecular Weight of Wet Gas 28.16
Molecular Weight of Dry Gas 28.97
Gas Stream Velocity
Static Pressure, inches water - 2.2
Absolute Pressure, inches mercury 29-82
Average Temperature, ฐF '36.
Pilot Tube Calibration Coefficient 0.839
Total Number of Sampling Points 12.0
Velocity at Actual Conditions, feet/second 51-3
Gas Stream Volumetric Flow
Stack Cross-Sectional Area, square feet
Volumetric Flow at Actual Conditions, cubic feet/minute
Volumetric Flow at Standard Conditions, cubic feet/minute
Percent Isokinetle 98.5
Process Operations Data See Appendix F for Operations Log
Standard Conditions = 68ฐF, 29-92 inches mercury, dry basis.
- 21 -
-------
GEORGIA KAOLIN COMPANY
Dry Branch, Georgia
TABLE 2
#8 Raymond Impact MM I Baghouse Exhaust
Summary of Test Data
Test Data
Test Number 1 2 3
Test Date 12-6-78 12-6-78 12-6-78
Test Period OSS-IS'tO 1655-181*0 19*5-2130
Samp I ing Data
Sampling Duration, minutes 96.0 96.0 96.0
Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.180 0.180 0.180
Barometric Pressure, inches mercury 29-98 29-98 29-98
Average Orifice Pressure Differential, inches water 1-72 1.72 1.77
Average Dry Gas Temperature at Meter, ฐF 95. 86. 76.
Sample Volume at Meter Conditions, cubic feet 69.07 69-89 73-32
Sample Volume at Standard Conditions, ' cubic feet 65.0* 66.92 71.52
Gas Stream Moisture Content
Total Water Collected by Train, ml 10*1.5 120.0 87.5
Standard Volume of Water Collected, cubic feet *-92 5-65 *ป.12
Moisture in Gas Stream, percent by volume 7.0 7-8 5.*
Mole Fraction of Dry Gas 0.929 0.922 0.9*6
Cas Stream Composition
C02, percent by volume . 0-0 0.0 0.0
03, percent by volume 20.9 20.9 20.9
CO, percent by volume . ฐ-ฐ ฐ-ฐ ฐ-ฐ
Nj, percent by volume 79-1 79-1 79-1
Molecular Weight of Wet Gas 28-20 28-'2 28-37
Molecular Weight of Dry Gas 28-97 28.97 28.97
Gas Stream Velocity
Static Pressure, inches water 1.6 1.7 1.6
Absolute Pressure, inches mercury 30.09 30.11 30.09
Average Temperature, ฐF 131. 1*1. '*'
Pitot Tube Calibration Coefficient 0.850 0.850 0.850
Total Number of Sampling Points 32.0 32.0 32.0
Velocity at Actual Conditions, feet/second 80.0 81.2 81.7
Gas Stream Volumetric Flow
Stack Cross-Sectional Area, square feet 3-69 3-69 3.69
Volumetric Flow at Actual Conditions, cubic feet/minute 17,690. 17,960. 18,060.
Volumetric Flow at Standard Conditions, cubic feet/minute 1*,790. 1*,650. 15,080.
Percent Isokinetlc 95.6 99-3 103-1
Process Operations Data SEE APPENDIX F FOR OPERATING LOG
Standard Conditions = 68 F, 29-92 inches mercury, dry basis.
- 22 -
-------
GEORGIA KAOLIN COMPANY
Dry Branch, Georgia
TABLE 3
Roller Hills Baghouse Inlet
Summary of Test Data
Test Data
Test Number '
Test Date ,\2'6
Test Period 1053-
Samp I ing Data
Sampling Duration, minutes 56-0
Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.188
Barometric Pressure, inches mercury 29-98
Average Orifice Pressure Differential, inches water 2.4
Average Dry Gas Temperature at Meter, ฐF 99.
Sample Volume at Meter Conditions, cubic feet 46.56
Sample Volume at Standard Conditions, ' cubic feet 43-28
Gas Stream Moisture Content
Total Water Collected by Train, ml 79.0
Standard Volume of Water Collected, cubic feet 3.72
Moisture in Gas Stream, percent by volume ''ฐ
Mole Fraction of Dry Gas ฐ-921
Gas Stream Composition
C02, percent by volume ฐ-ฐ
02, percent by volume 20.9.
CO, percent by volume ".0
Nj, percent by volume 79.1
Molecular Weight of Wet Gas 28.10
Molecular Weight of Dry Gas 28.97
Gas Stream Velocity
Static Pressure, inches water - 3-'
Absolute Pressure, inches mercury 29-75
Average Temperature, F '34.
Pitot Tube Calibration Coefficient 0.839
Total Number of Sampling Points 28.0
Velocity at Actual Conditions, feet/second 86.6
Gas Stream Volumetric Flow
Stack Cross-Sectional Area, square feet 1-65
Volumetric Flow at Actual Conditions, cubic feet/minute 3,550.
Volumetric Flow at Standard Conditions, cubic feet/minute 6,960.
Percent Isokinetic 94.9
Process Operations Data See Appendix F for Operations Log
Standard Conditions - 68ฐF. 29.92 inches mercury, dry basis.
- 23 -
-------
GEORGIA KAOLIN COMPANY
Dry Branch, Georgia
TABLE 4
Roller Mills Baghouse Exhaust
Summary of Test Data
Test Data
Test Number 1 2 3
Test Date 12-5-78 12-5-78 12-5-78
Test Period 0953-1203 1357-1605 1030-1252
SampI Ing Data
Sampling Duration, minutes '20.0 120.0 120.0
Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.189 0.189 0.189
Barometric Pressure, inches mercury 30.22 30.22 29-98
Average Orifice Pressure Differential, inches water 1.01 1.02 1.05 .
Average Dry Gas Temperature at Meter, ฐF 57. 73. 78.
Sample Volume at Meter Conditions, cubic feet 63-78 65.29 65.42
Sample Volume at Standard Conditions, ' cubic feet 65-29 6^.79 63.87
Gas Stream Moisture Content
Total Water Collected by Train, ml 126.5 143-4 98.
Standard Volume of Water Collected, cubic feet jj.96 6.75 ฃ.61
Moisture in Gas Stream, percent by volume "* 9-4 6.7
Mole Fraction of Dry Gas ฐ-9'6 0-906 0.933
Gas Stream Composition
C02, percent by volume ฐ-ฐ 0.0 0.0
02, percent by volume 20-9 20-9 20'9
CO, percent by volume ฐ-ฐ ฐ-ฐ ฐ-ฐ
N2, percent by volume 79-' 79.1 79-1
Molecular Weight of Wet Gas 28.05 27-93 28.23
Molecular Weight of Dry Gas 28.97 28.97 28.97
Gas Stream Velocity
Static Pressure, inches water 0-50 0.60 0.55
Absolute Pressure, inches mercury 30.26 30.26 30.02
Average Temperature, ฐF 129- 123- 136.
Pitot Tube Calibration Coefficient ฐ-835 0.835 0.835
Total Number of Sampling Points 20.0 20.0 20.0
Velocity at Actual Conditions, feet/second 51-9 52.1 54.8
Gas Stream Volumetric Flow
Stack Cross-Sectional Area, square feet 3-14 3-14 3-14
Volumetric Flow at Actual Conditions, cubic feet/minute 9,780. 9,830. 10,340.
Volumetric Flow at Standard Conditions, cubic feet/minute 8,120. 8,150. 8,560.
Percent Isokinetic 108.0 106.8 100.2
Process Operations Data See Appendix F for Operations Log
Standard Conditions =68ฐ F, 29-92 inches mercury, dry basis.
- 24 -
-------
GEORGIA KAOLIN COMPANY
Dry Branch, Georgia
TABLE 5
#8 Raymond Impact Mill Baghouse Inlet
Summary of Test Results
Test Data
Test Number 1
Test Date 12-6-78
Test Time J615-1723
Gas Flow
Standard Cubic Feet/minute, dry 14,040.
Actual Cubic Feet/minute, wet 17,180.
Particulates
Nozzle, Probe and Front Half Filter Holder 2.0415
Catch Fraction,g
Filter Catch Fraction, g 6.3624
Total Particulates, g 8.4039
Particulate Emissions
f\
Grains/dry standard cubic foot 4.53
Pounds/hour 545.
Based on Total Particulates captured by train.
O f\
Standa'rd Conditions = 68 F and 29-92 inches mercury.
Test conducted concurrently with Run 2, No. 8 Raymond Impact Mill Baghouse
Exhaust Test.
- 25 -
-------
GEORGIA KAOLIN COMPANY
Dry Branch, Georgia
TABLE 6
#8 Raymond Impact Mill Baghouse Exhaust
Summary of Test Results
Test Data
Test Number 1
Test Date 12-6-78
Test Time: 1355-1540
Gas Flow
Standard Cubic Feet/minute, dry 14,790.
Actual Cubic Feet/minute, wet 17,690.
Particulates
Nozzle and Front Half Filter Holder
Catch Fraction, g
Fflter Catch Fraction, g
Total Particulates,g
Particulate Emissions
Grains/dry standard cubic foot
Pounds/hour
Baghouse Particulate Removal
Eff i c i ency,pe rcen t
Visible Emissions
5 percent opacity, minutes observed 0.0
0 percent opacity, minutes observed 90.0
Unobserved readings, minuted observed 0.0
0.020
2/49
12-6-78
1655-1840
14,650.
17,960.
3
12-6-78
1945-2130
15,080.
18,060.
0.0381
0.0447-
0.0828
0.0228
0.0309
0.0537
0.0258
0.0460
0.0718
0.012
1.54
99.72
0.016
2.01
1
Based on Total Particulates captured by train.
Standard Conditions = 68 F and 29-92 inches mercury
3
Opacity results listed are in minutes of the observed reading during the test period,
- 26 -
-------
GEORGIA KAOLIN COMPANY
Dry Branch, Georgia
TABLE 7
Roller Mills Baghouse Inlet
Summary of Test Results
Test Data
Test Number 1
Test Date 12-6-78
Test Time 1053-12^0
Gas Flow
Standard Cubic Feet/minute, dry 6,960.
Actual Cubic Feet/minute, wet 8,550.
Particulates
Nozzle, Probe and Front Half Filter Holder l.*ป983
Catch Fraction, g.
Filter Catch Fraction , g 3.4416
Total Particulates, g 4.9399
Particulate Emissions
2
Grains/dry standard cubic foot 1.76
Pounds/hour 105.
Based on Total Particulates captured by train.
Standard Conditions = 68 F and 29.92 inches mercury.
Test conducted concurrently with Run 3, Roller Mills Baghouse Exhaust Test.
- 27 -
-------
GEORGIA KAOLIN COMPANY
Dry Branch, Georgia
TABLE 8
Roller Mills Baghouse Exhaust
Summary of Test Results
Test Data
Test Number
Test Date
Test Time
Gas Flow
Standard Cubic Feet/Minute,dry
Actual Cubic Feet/minute, wet
Particulates
Nozzle and Front Half Filter Holder
Catch Fraction, g
Filter Catch Fraction, g
Total Particulates, 9
Particulate Emissions
Grains/dry standard cubic foot
Pounds/hour
Baghouse Particulate Removal Efficiency,
percent
Visible Emissions
1
12-5-78
0953-1203
8,120.
9,780.
>_ 10 percent opacity, minutes observed
- 5 percent opacity, minutes observed
0 percent opacity, minutes observed
Unobservable reading, minutes observed
0.010
0.73
.0.0
112.75
3-
A.25
2
12-5-78
1357-1605
8,150.
9,830.
0.005
0.38
120.0
12-6-78
1030-1252
8,560.
10,3^0.
0.0335
0.0107
0.0442
0.0152
0.0075
0.0227
0.0241
0.0029
0.0270
0.007
0.48
99.54
120.0
1
Based on Total Particulates captured by train.
e\ _
Standard Conditions = 68 F and 29-92 inches mere ury
^Opacfty results 1tsted are in minutes of the observed reading during the 120
minute test period.
- 28 -
-------
GEORGIA KAOLIN COMPANY
Dry Branch, Georgta
TABLE
PARTtCLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION
Date: December 6, 1978
Location: Georgia Kaolin
Sampling Location: Raymond Mill
Traverse Point No. Sampled: X~
Pbar (In. HgO
Stack Temp ( F)
Sample Time (Min)
Sample Volume (cf)
Moisture (% H20)
Meter Temp (ฐF)
Flow Setting, H
(in. H2)
Nozzle Diameter (in.)
29.98
135.
946
5
2
8.
82.
0.94
0.188
Sample Flow Rate (at stack conditions): 0.59 cfm
Plate
No.
1
2
3
4
5;
6
7
8
Net.Wt.
(mg)
35.1
45.9
124.9
97-3
30.9
12.3
2.1
0.0
%
10.1
13-2
35.8
27.9
8.0
3-5
0.0
0.0
Cumulative
100.
89-9
76.7
40.9
13-0
0.6
0.0
EAD
(Microns)
13.1 and larger
8.1
5-5
3.8
1.2
0.7
ซ._..
Backup
Filter
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTAL
348.5
- 29 -
-------
RAYMOND IMPACT MILL BAGHOUSE EXHAUST STACK
PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION
o
I
EFFECTIVE AERODYNAMIC PARTICLE DIAMETER, microns
O O O O O O O OO ' N> V*> -p- VI ON ซ-J 00 U) O
K> V*> JT ui CT\ -vj OCAO O O O OOOOOOO
s
/
/
s
x
/
/
/
/
/
/
j
/
t
jf
'
' .
1
0.0! O.C5 0. I 0.2 0.5 I
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
CUMULATIVE PERCENTAGE
(% WEIGHT LESS THAN DIAMETER)
FIGURE 7
95
91 99
98.1 99.9
99.99
-------
GEORGIA KAOUN COMPANY
Dry Branch, Georgia
TABLE 10
PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION
Date: December 6, 1978
Location: Georgia Kaolin
Sampling Location: Roller Mill
Traverse Point No. Sampled: Y-6
Pbar tln- H9-* 29'98
Stack Temp (ฐF) 135.
Sample Time (Min) 3.
Sample Volume (cf) 2.796
Moisture (% H20) 8.
Reter Temp (ฐF) 96.
Flow Setting, H 2.6
(in. H2)
Nozzle Diameter (in.) 0.188
Sample Flow Rate (at stack conditions):
Plate
No.
1
2
3
4
5;
6
7
8
Net Wt.
(mg)
17.0
21. k
37.1
23.0
16.8
7-1
O.k
0.0 "."}
%
13.2
21.3
28.8
17.9
13.0
5.5
0.3
0.0
Cumulative
%
100
86.8
65.5
36.7
18.8
5.8
0.3
0.0
EAD
(Microns)
10.3 and larger
6.7
k.k
2.9
1.8
1.0
0.6
0.4
Backup
Filter
0.0
0.0
0.0
TOTAL
128.8
- 31 -
-------
ROLLER MILLS BAQHOUSE EXHAUST STACK
PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION
- Zฃ -
EFFECTIVE AERODYNAMIC PARTICLE DIAMETER, microns
o o ooooooo .to oj-p-vnON^j covo o
M >jj jr VI
-------
December 5, 1978
Date:
Type oT~tfischarge: Stack
Table II
SUMMARY OF VISIBLE EMISSIONS
Type of Plant:
Clay
Height of Point of Discharge: Approx!00'
Wind Direction: Easi
Color of Plume: \~"~"
Observer No.:
wn i te
Location of Discharge:Roller Mill Outlet
Description of Sky; Clear Blue
Wind Velocity:
Detached Plume:"
- iu mi/nr
Yes
Distance from Observer to Discharge Point: _
Direction of Observer from Discharge Point:
Height of Observation Point: Approx. 100'
Description of Background: Clear Blue
Duration of Observation:
Approx. 25'
Approx. 2 n
Southeast
Set
Number
1
2
3
k
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
SUMMARY OF AVERAGE OPACITY
Tl
Start
0953
0958
1003
1008
1013
1018
1023
1028
1033
1044
1049
1054
1059
1104
1109
1114
1119
1124
1129
1134
Tie
End
0958
1003
1008
1013
1018
1023
1028
1033
1038
1049
1054
1059
1104
1109
1114
1119
1124
1129
1134
1139
Op<
Sum
100
90
95
100
90
100
90
100
55
100
95
100
100
100
100
95
100
90
100
100
aclty
Average
5
5
5
5
5
5
5"
5
2.9
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5 .
5
5
Set
Number
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
T
Start
1139
1144
1149
1154
1159
me
End
1144
1149
1154
1159
1203
Opa
Sum
95
95
80 .
95
70
pity
Average
5
5
4.7
5
4.4
Sketch Showing How Opacity Varied with Time:
10, :
Opacity
(*)
lo
V hr
Time .,
TT
2'.hr
-33-
-------
December 1978.
Date:
Type of Discharge: Stack
Table 12
SUMMARY OF VISIBLE EMISSIONS
Type of Plant:
Height of Po.int of Discharge:
Wind Direction: _ East
Color of Plume: _
Observer No.:
Approx. 100'
White
Distance from Observer to Discharge Point:
Direction of Observer from Discharge Point: Southeast
Height of Observation PoTnt;
Description of Background:
Description of Sky:
Wind Velocity:
Detached Plume:
Duration of Observation:
Approx. 25'
Clay
charge:
Sky:
5 -
Ro 1 1 e r Mill
Clear Blue
10 mi/h
Outlet
Yes
Approx. 2 h
Approx. 100'
Clear Blue
Set
Number
1
2
3
k
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
SUMMARY OF AVERAGE OPACITY
Tl
Start
1050
1055
1105
1110
1115
1120
1125
1130
1135
1140
1145
1150
1155
1200
1205
1210
1215
1220
1225
1230
me
End
1055
1100
1110
1115
1120
1125
1130
1135
1140
1145
1150
1155
1200
1205
1210
1215
1220
1225
1230
1235
Opacity
Sum
0
0
'0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Average
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Set
Number
21
22
23
2k
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
ko
T
Start
1235
1240
1245
1250
me
End
1240
1245
1250
1251
Opa
Sum
0
0
0 .
0
pity
Average
0
0
0
0
Sketch Showing How Opacity Varied with Time:
10
Opacity
1 hr
Time .
lo"
2 hr
-34-
-------
December 5, 1978
Stack
Date:
Type of Discharge:
Height of Pojnt of Discharge:
Wind Direction: East
Color of Plume:
Observer No.:
Table 13
SUMMARY OF VISIBLE EMISSIONS
Type of Plant:
Clay
100'
White
Location of Discharge; Roller Mill Outlet
Description of Sky; Clear Blue
Wind Velocity: 5-10 mi/h
Detached Plume:
Yes
Distance from Observer to Discharge Point:
Direction of Observer from Discharge Point;"Southeast
Height of Observation Potnt; 100'
Descrlptton of Background:
Duration of Observation:
25'
^28t
Clear Blue
-
Set
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
SUMMARY OF AVERAGE OPACITY
Tl
Start
1357
1402
1407
1412
1417
1422
1427
1432
1437
1442
1447
1452
1457
1502
1507
1512
1517
1522
1527
1532
ne
End
1402
1407
1412
1417
1422
1427
1432
1437
1442
1447
1452
1457
1502
1507
1512
1517
1522
1527
1532
1537
Opacity
Sum
0
0
'0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Average
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Set
Number
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
T
Start
1537
1542
1547
1552
1557
1602
me
End
1542
1547
1552
1557
1602
1605
Opa<
Sum
0
0
0 .
0
0
0
pity
Average
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sketch Showing How Opacity Varied with Time:
10
Opacity
(ซ
TT
1 h'r
Time
15
30
45
2.hr
-35-
-------
Table. 14
SUMMARY OF VISIBLE EMISSIONS
December 6, 1978
Date:
Type of Discharge: Stack
Height of Po.int of Discharge; Approx. 80'
Wind Direction: Northwest
Color of Plume:
Observer No.:
wn i te
Distance from Observer to Discharge Point:
Direction of Observer from Discharge Point:
Height of Observation Potnt;
Descrlptton of Background:
Type of Plant:
Clay Processing
Location of Discharge:
Description of Sky; Blue
Wind Velocity:
Detached Plume:
#8 Raymond Impact Mil 1
5 mi/h
Duration of Observation:
7'
South
80T
lireen nne Forest
No
1 1/2 h
Set
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
SUMMARY OF AVERAGE OPACITY
Tl
Start
1400
1405
1410
1415
1420
1425
1430
1435
1440
1445
1450
1455
1500
1505
1510
1515
1520
1525
ne
End
1405
1410
1415
1420
1425
1430
1435
1440
1445
1^50
1455
1500
1505
1510
1515
1520
1525
1530
Opacity
Sum
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.0
0
0
0
Average
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Set
Number
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
ko
T
Start
me
End
Opa
Sum
fity
Average
Sketch Showing How Opacity Varied with Time:
10
Opacity
(ซ
1
15 '
0
30 45 V hr 15 3'0 <+5
Time , : .. .
2 hr
-36-
-------
APPENDIX A
RAW TEST DATA
-------
TRAVERSE POINT LOCATION FOR CIRCULAR DUCTS
PLANT (^gOf^) C^ JCCXAhv^
nซ-rr I*N LJ ซ^ TV
DATE
SAMPLING LOCATION
INSIDE OF FAR WALL TO
OUTSIDE OF PORT. (DISTANCE A> _
INSIDE OF NEAR WALL TO
OUTSIDE OF PORT. (DISTANCE B) _
STACK I.D.. (DISTANCE A - DISTANCE B).
NEAREST UPSTREAM DISTURBANCE
NEAREST DOWNSTREAMDISTURBANCE.
CALCULATOR.
3
O
o
SCHEMATIC OF SAMPLING LOCATION
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
x-y /
1 2
J3
V
5"
(,
FRACTION
OF STACK I.D.
.OW
./46
.1%
. -JSiV
.^s-y
,."7r
4-
TRAVERSE POINT LOCA", ION
FROM OUTSIDE OF PORT
(SUM OF COLUMNS 4 & 5)
y7^
S"^
/2''
Jt"
3*V#*
.?vy**
-------
PRELIMINARY VELOCITY TRAVERSE
PLANT
DATE
LOCATION -^
STACK I.D. 3g? "
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, in. Hg_
STACK GAUGE PRESSURE, in. H^O
y . S*\ s\ A t t
OPERATORS.
ฑjLฃ%._
SCHEMATIC OF TRAVERSE POINT LAYOUT
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
y- 1
j
:?
y
r
c
h
AVERAGE
VELOCITY
HEAD
Ups), in.H20
S.ZO
/.30
fo
/So
j.^o
/.in
/,%$
STACK
TEMPERATURE
(Ts), ฐF
S23
11}
y^v
/AT
/a
/. 35"
t.&
STACK
TEMPERATURE
(Ts). 8F
te.3
/j r
;3 s-
>^rr
XJV
/^f
-------
NOMOGRAPH DATA
PLANT.
DATE_
SAMPLING LOCATION
CONTROL BOX NO. _
CALIBRATED PRESSURE DIFFERENTIAL ACROSS
ORIFICE, in. H20
AVERAGE METER TEMPERATURE (AMBIENT + 20 ฐF). "F
PERCENT MOISTURE IN GAS STREAM BY VOLUME
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE AT METER, in Hg
STATIC PRESSURE IN STACK, in. Hg
(Pmฑ0.073 x STACK GAUGE PRESSURE in in. H20)
RATIO OF STATIC PRESSURE TO METER PRESSURE
AVERAGE STACK TEMPERATURE, ฐF
AVERAGE VELOCITY HEAD. in. H20
MAXIMUM VELOCITY HEAD. in. H20
C FACTOR
CALCULATED NOZZLE DIAMETER, in.
ACTUAL NOZZLE DIAMETER, in.
REFERENCED, in. H20
^Hfa
Tmavg.
Bwo
pm
ps
p'pm
savg.
^pavg.
APmax.
t
:/
./*
/,6
A 88
?o
W
/,*o
i*r
I.3&
l,6o
06
r55
5
0'
-------
PLANT
DATE
SAMPLING LOCATION
SAMPLE TYPE
RUN NUMBER
OPERATOR
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
STATIC PRESSURE. (P,
FILTER NUMBER Is)
5
PROBE LENGTH AND TYPE
NOZZLE I D._. .
ASSUMED MOISTURE,'.
SAMPLE BOX NUMBER
METER BOX NUMBER
METER AHfe "**
C FACTOR . tf'Ob.
PI TOT TUBE FACTOR /f 3 ?
REFERENCE
NOTE
/,
READ AND RECORD ALL DATA EVERY.
MINUTES
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
CLOCK TIME
__#7ฃ
GAS METER READING
VELOCITY
HEAD
UP$I. in. H?0
68
ORIFICE PRESSURE
DIFFERENTIAL
(AH), in. H^O)
DESIRED ACTUAL
.63
3L
.*<*
STACK
TEMPERATURE
(T$l."F
/f z_
DRY GAS METER
TEMPERATURE
INLET OUTLET
to
6
TO
- -'
"
< U
^ J^
'0/9894
0.83"$
283575
4&459J9&47
1--* -
i
Tt
6P
if i i^OVi.
-------
ncuu DA^^
PLANT
DATE
SAMPLING LOCAT|Oj)
SAMPLE TYPE
RUN NUMBER
OPERATOR _
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
STATIC PRESSURE.!!?^
FILTER NUMBER M,'
PROBE LENGTH AND TYPE
NOZZLE 1.0. _. .
ASSUMED MOISTURE.'.
SAMPLE BOX NUMBER
METER BOX NUMBER
.METER AH,.
C FACTOR
PI TOT TUBE FACTOR
REFERENCE -
NOTE
READ AND RECORD ALL DATA EV,ฃJปY
-------
TRAVERSE POINT LOCATION FOR CIRCULAR DUCTS
PLANT
DATE .
SAMPLING LOCATION
INSIDE OF FAR WALL TO
OUTSIDE OF PORT. (DISTANCE A) _
INSIDE OF NEAR WALL TO
OUTSIDE OF PORT. (DISTANCE B! _
STACK I.D.. (DISTANCE A - DISTANCE B)
"NEAREST UPSTREAM DISTURBANCE
NEAREST DOWNSTREAM DISTURBANCE.
CALCULATOR.
SCHEMATIC OF SAMPLING LOCATION
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
FRACTION
OF STACK I.D.
STACK I.D.
PRODUCT OF
COLUMNS 2 AND 3
(TO NEAREST 1 8 INCH)
DISTANCE B
TRAVERSE POINT LOCA', ION
FROM OUTSIDE OF PORT
(SUM OF COLUMNS 4 & 5)
-7 /
3
3
9
7
9
V
-------
PRELIMINARY VELOCITY TRAVERSE
PLANT.
DATE /J
LOCATION
STACK I.D..
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, in. Hg 1.0.8?
STACK GAUGE PRESSURE, in. H20
OPERATORS
\,
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
J
/o
AVERAGE
VELOCITY
HEAD
Ups). in.H20
Id)
2 IT
I.D
/f
STACK
TEMPERATURE
(Ts). eF
a 7
SCHEMATIC OF TRAVERSE POINT LAYOUT
,UปW (. I
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
y-
r
7
Sc?
y r*
AVERAGE
VELOCITY
HEAD
/. 5*0
/, S"
.O
J.I3
J.JF
STACK
TEMPERATURE
(Tsi. ฐF
/,
l.l )
-------
NOMOGRAPH DATA
PLANT <5"=i .
DATE._
ivx
\-L- A-
SAMPLING LOCATION
CONTROL BOX NO. _
CALIBRATED PRESSURE DIFFERENTIAL ACROSS
ORIFICE, in. H20
AVERAGE METER TEMPERATURE lAMBIENT + 20ฐF).ฐF
PERCENT MOISTURE IN GAS STREAM BY VOLUME
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE AT METER, in Hg
STATIC PRESSURE IN STACK, in. Hg
(Pmฑ0.073 x STACK GAUGE PRESSURE in in. H20)
U /
r,
RATIO OF STATIC PRESSURE TO METER PRESSURE
AVERAGE STACK TEMPERATURE, ฐF
AVERAGE VELOCITY HEAD. in. H20
MAXIMUM VELOCITY HEAD. in. H20
C FACTOR
CALCULATED NOZZLE DIAMETER, in.
ACTUAL NOZZLE DIAMETER, in.
REFERENCE Ap. in. H20
^ ,
T(navg.
Bwo
pn,
ps
PsPm
savg.
t
Apavg.
APmax.
1 t
' '*ป
3C ,
/
V >^^
%
ซ
^o.o
So.i
1 - 0
I3o
\,15
2-. 3
??
^4
90
&6
-------
SAMPLING
SAMPLE
RUN NUMBER
OPERATOR
AMBIENT TEMPER AJURE
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
STATIC PRESSURE. (Psl
FILTER NUMBER Is)
Tent* ----
ffiwt Alt*
PROBE LENGTH AND TYPE"
NOZZLE I.D.y JT^
ASSUMED MOISTURE.'. _งL. __.
SAMPLE BOX NUMBER
METER BOX NUMBER
METER AH.. V.g-y
C FACTOR
7
PITOT TUBE FACTOR
REFERENCE 6p /
READ AND RECORD ALL DATA EVERY
-------
-------
DAW
SAMPLING LOCATION *
SAMPLE TYPE
RUN NUMBER
OPERATOR _
AMBIENT TEMPERAJURE
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
STATIC PRESSURE.
FILTER NUMBER (s)
PROBE LENGTH ANDTYPE.
NOZZLE f D. ^ / W
ASSUMED MOISTURE.'.
SAMPLE BOX NUMBER
METER BOX NUMBER.
.METER AHb
C FACTOR
PITOT TUBE FACTOR
REFERENCE
NOTE
READ AND RECORD ALL DATA EVERY
-.
_3LtLL
MINUTES
DRY GAS METER
TEMPERATURE
ORIFICE PRESSURE
DIFFERENTIAL
IAH). in. HjOl
-------
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
CLOCK TIME
CAS METER READING
IVI. II3
VELOCITY
HEAD
mp$>. in HjQ
ORIFICE PRESSURE
DIFFERENTIAL
IAH). in HOl
DESIRED ACTUAL
STACK
TEMPERATURE
lTfl.ฐF
DRY GAS METER
TEMPERATURE
INLET OUTLET
PUMP
VACUUM.
in HI
SAMPLE BOX
TEMPERATURE.
ฐF
1 (WINGER
TEMPERATURE.
ฐF
y-;
T-air.v
/vr
11L
3L
X99
ฅ2-
&-
&-
0
T^:
'
y
-------
SUMMARY
RECORD OF VISIBLE EMISSIONS
Type of Plant ( 7 (r-a,. Observer
/ jr w -...
Type of Discharge V^TAC^/ OTHER
Discharge Location
Height of Point-of Discharge 21
Observer's Location:
/
Distance to Discharge Point 7
Height of Observation Point ^ '
Direction from Discharge Point
Background Description (
Overcast ' Partly Cloudy Other , Sky Color
f
VJind Direction A/ a/ Wind Velocity -5" mi/hr
Plume Description:
Detached: Yes
Color: Black (T/hit
-------
RECORD OF VISIBLE EMISSIONS
Company Name (r
o
0
0
o
o
o
o
o
o
0
0
o
o
COMMEOTS
,
1
_i
f
i
i
i
i
-------
RECORD OK VISIBLE EMISSIONS
Company Name G-3 . K
0
0
o
30
o
0
o
V
o
ti
o
o
o
&
o
Q
o
0
o
o
o
o
0
0
o
o
6>
O
o
0
0
C3
o
0
45
o
Q
-------
RECORD OF VISIBLE EMISSIONS
ซ &o \ > /$._ _ Date __
Company flame
Plant Address "Dwyy f^v-oxe-k . G&..
/ -1
Stack Location ? ft
&OP
Observer
Weather Conditions See V-gce>voC
Observer's
Location
TIME
HR
/S
/5
MIN
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
/19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
SECONDS
00
o
o
o
0
o
o
o
o
c
G/
O
0
o
0
o
o
o
&
o
0
o
o
o
o
o
o
&
0
o
o
15
o
a
o
o
0
o
o
o
a
o
O
o
o
0
c?
&>
0
c?
0
o
o
o
o
o
O
0
0
o
o
o
30
o
o
o
e>
O
0
o
o
o
0
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
ฃป
c>
o
o
o
o
o
o
0
o
45
O
o
&
O
o
o>
o
o
o
o
o
o
0
o
o
0
0
o
o
0
o
o
o
o
o
c>
&
o
o
o
COMMENTS
.
,
j
}
\
i
i
-------
PLANT
-------
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
CLOCK TIME
GAS METER READING
.VBi. II3
VELOCITY
HEAD
(Ap$l. in. H^O
ORIFICE PRESSURE
DIFFERENTIAL
(AH), in H?0i
DESIRED ACTUAL
STACK
TEMPERATURE
(T$I.ฐF
DRY GAS METER
TEMPERATURE
INLET
ซT.JB..-F
OUTLET
-------
TRAVERSE POINT LOCATION FOR CIRCULAR DUCTS
PLANT
DATE
SAMPLING LOCATION
INSIDE OF FAR WALL TO
. OUTSIDE OF PORT. (DISTANCE A) _
INSIDE OF NEAR WALL TO
OUTSIDE OF PORT. (DISTANCE B) _
STACK I.D.. (DISTANCE A - DISTANCE B).
NEAREST UPSTREAM DISTURBANCE
NEAREST DOWNSTREAM DJSTURBANCE _
CALCULATOR
17
/ปฃ? P.p.
SCHEMATIC OF SAMPLING LOCATION
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
X- /
IT
3
4
^r
6
7
e
f
/o
ft
12
f?
^
FRACTION
OF STACK I.D.
,0(?
.os-i
.a'*'}
,1-tt
,-LoJ
, 1^=5
,-iU
.4S-V
.1^1
.T^^
. *5*
,^01
.9-V?
.5?^-
' ซ
STACK I.D.
1 7 . V7 S
PRODUCT OF
COLUMNS 2 AND 3
(TO NEAREST 1 8 INCH)
" y^
\
i V^
2 XL
3 'A.
^ VJP
4 V^
Tป
irV-v
\^ v^
lA^
i r#i
R V^
u %
\
DISTANCE B
SV^f<
TRAVERSE POINT LOCA^, ION
FROM OUTSIDE OF PORT
(SUM OF COLUMNS 4 & 5)
SV4 "
UA
7
n V4
7V^
? 7/a
- I I */8
\ (, '/4
\t>
\5 '/a
lO'/fl
TO r/8
*.v*/ft
T-T'/S
,
-------
PRELIMINARY VELOCITY TRAVERSE
PLANT C-7* , K3hto ^ป-v
DATE I T-- - I X
LOCATION gbd2e& -#*&!&Ls /7,'Li
STACK I.D. I "^ Vซ "
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, in Hg
STACK GAUGE PRESSURE, in. H.O 3. 1
OPERATORS
C^\^a.v^o/ Y^V1*^*
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
AVERAGE
VELOCITY
HEAD
Ups), in.H20
2 1
2,fg
2,2*
2, 1
1. 1
2,Oฃ
/,*?ฃ
J,t
/.&
/, K
f ^7
r^ 0
/,-}ฃ-
/* ^
/,7
Ji 7
I,Z
IJZ
STACK
TEMPERATURE
(Ts). ฐF
/?z
J?ฃ
/26>
13 L
13*7
/57
J37
/ฃ7
/3&
/3 ?
/**
/3%
ft*
/3&
/3
f ^f*) cS
/ &\ ^^
i
SCHEMATIC OF TRAVERSE POINT LAYOUT
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
AVERAGE
VELOCITY
HEAD
IAps>. i
A75"
STACK
TEMPERATURE
(Tsป. ฐF
/3S
S42.
fit-
-------
NOMOGRAPH DATA
PLANT
DATE_
SAMPLING LOCATION
CONTROL BOX NO. _
CALIBRATED PRESSURE DIFFERENTIAL ACROSS
ORIFICE, in. H20
AVERAGE METER TEMPERATURE ( AMBIENT + 20 ฐF),ฐF
PERCENT MOISTURE IN GAS STREAM BY VOLUME
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE AT METER, in Hg
STATIC PRESSURE IN STACK, in. Hg -.-^ ( j
(Pmฑ0.073 x STACK GAUGE PRESSURE in in. H20)
RATIO OF STATIC PRESSURE TO METER PRESSURE
AVERAGE STACK TEMPERATURE, ฐF
AVERAGE VELOCITY HEAD. in. H20
MAXIMUM VELOCITY HEAD. in. H20
C FACTOR I
CALCULATED NOZZLE DIAMETER, in.
/
ACTUAL NOZZLE DIAMETER, in.
REFERENCE Ap. in. H20
^HCa
T|navg.
Bwo
pm
PS
P'Pm
savg.
*Pavg.
^Pmax.
/.6
J\
.1
/.t
/,??
?o
7
/.o
/4o
/,**
2.2~o
)
it
99
~s~
-------
PLANT.
DATE_
SAMPLING LOCATION.
SAMPLE TYPE
RUN NUMBER.
OPERATOR.
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE .
STATIC PRESSURE. |P$)_
FILTER NUMBER (s)
.- S . J
fJt^S; < tf
PROBE LENGTH AND TYPE.
NOZZLE ID... *l(
ASSUMED MOISTURE.".
SAMPLE BOX NUMBER
METER BOX NUMBER.
METER AHto
C FACTOR . . ,
PI TOT TUBE FACTOR
REFERENCE Ap L
NOTE
READ AND RECORD ALL DATA EVERY.
MINUTES
DRY GAS METER
TEMPERATURE
ORIFICE PRESSURE
DIFFERENTIAL
IAH). in. HJDl
;^>*1^:;pฃ
; . ,- ปif,f ix!;--':-1
Ul IM
-------
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
CLOCK TIME
GAS METER READING
VELOCITY
HEAD
Uipl m H0
ORIFICE PRESSURE
DIFFERENTIAL
IdHh in HjO)
DESIRED ACTUAL
STACK
TEMPERATURE
iT$i.ฐF
DRY GAS METER
TEMPERATURE
INLET OUTLET
PUMP
VACUUM.
in H|
SAMPLE BOX
TEMPERATURE.
IMPINGER
TEMPERATURE
ฐF
Tn,
A
i
-------
PLANT.
DATEL
SAMPLING LOCATION
SAMPLE TYPE <
RUN NUMBER:
OPERATOR :__
AMBIENT .TEMPERATURE ฃ1
BAROMETRIC PRESSUR^ "?.
STATIC PRESSURE.
-------
TRAVERSE POINT LOCATION FOR CIRCULAR DUCTS
he.
PLANT
DATE ...19,.
SAMPLING LOCATION _
INSIDE OF FAR WALL TO
OUTSIDE OF PORT, (DISTANCE A) _
INSIDE OF NEAR WALL TO
OUTSIDE OF PORT. (DISTANCE B) _
STACK I.D.. (DISTANCE A DISTANCE B).
NEAREST UPSTREAM DISTURBANCE
NEAREST DOWNSTREAM DISTURBANCE.
CALCULATOR.
fecy Q IV
' \\
St."
SCHEMATIC OF SAMPLING LOCATION
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
FRACTION
OF STACK I.D.
STACK I.D.
PRODUCT OF
COLUMNS 2 AND 1
(TO NEAREST I 8 INCH)
DISTANCE B
TRAVERSE POINT LOCA'i ION
FROM OUTSIDE OF PORT
(SUM OF COLUMNS 4 & 5)
ฑ.
SL
<*>
fO
-------
PRELIMINARY VELOCITY TRAVERSE
''
PLANT V3 fr . V
DATE Ull
LOCATION I.-B\\
STACK I.D. }
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, in.
STACK GAUGE PRESSURE, in. H.Q - . 0 "7
OPERATORS 5 a^^a>v Q * fJ 7
STACK
TEMPERATURE
(Ts>. 8F
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
V- i
1
T,
^
^
k
1
I
V ' '
AVERAGE
VELOCITY
HEAD
Qpsi, in.H20
i '
.V\5"
. \4
^
. >^S
. \^
^
.\^^
, /3/
STACK
TEMPERATURE
(Tsi. ฐF
-
'
-------
NOMOGRAPH DATA
PLANT.
DATE._
SAMPLING LOCATION
CONTROL BOX NO. _
CALIBRATED PRESSURE DIFFERENTIAL ACROSS
ORIFICE, in. H20
AVERAGE METER TEMPERATURE (AMBIENT 4- 20 ฐF), "F
PERCENT MOISTURE IN GAS STREAM BY VOLUME
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE AT METER, in Hg
STATIC PRESSURE IN STACK, in. Hg - . 0 "7
(Pmฑ0.073 x STACK GAUGE PRESSURE in in. H20)
RATIO OF STATIC PRESSURE TO METER PRESSURE
AVERAGE STACK TEMPERATURE, ฐF
AVERAGE VELOCITY HEAD. in. H20
MAXIMUM VELOCITY HEAD. in. H20
C FACTOR
CALCULATED NOZZLE DIAMETER, in.
APTIIfil Mn77l C nifiMPTCR in
<\\i 1 UHL nUฃฃLll UIHIilL 1 Cn. In.
REFERENCE Ap. in. H20
^
T(navi.
Bwo
pm
ps
Ps?m
savg.
^pavg.
APmax.
,*f
JL,1
-T7/
-err
/.9
90
.&$%
i3.W>
s.o
-rf
^^
^
>\
$ J5?
^-y ป5>}J
"3* ,100
n*
I.M5
-------
PLANT
DATE
SAMPLING LOCATI
SAMPLE TYPE
RUN NUMBER
OPERATOR
AMBIENT TEMPERAJURE
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
STATIC PRESSURE. fPs>
FILTER NUMBER Is)
PROBE LENGTH ANOJJP,
NOZZLE ID.. ป
ASSUMED MOISTURE. % _
SAMPLE BOX NUMBER __l
METER BOX NUMBER
.METER .. =
C FACTOR I.
PITOT TUBE
REFERENCE
NOTE
E FACTOJU_J32_A ~ ' ฅ_3S*
AP A%ฃ*
READ AND RECORD ALL DATA EVERY.
MINUTES
\
?**y 1,'s * ซ"- u "- 2i- ! ,',--.i. **-. -*/r--*"*c
^4^g-^0^14f'2'J|i^.:>^y
^; If:"'"' ^ ~*.''i''*,"-v'j- *-. '"-"^ feV;ji^
^ ^%T, iffe '<ฃ J^" k '4'^ i *? * jr-'^IX'*:''.- '^$S|S
-------
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
fl I
a
CLOCK TIME
GAS METER READING
iVmi. II
0 - 3
VELOCITY
HEAD
lAp{>. in H?0
ORIFICE PRESSURE
DIFFERENTIAL
(AH), in HOi
DESIRED ACTUAL
STACK
TEMPERATURE
(T$l.ฐF
DRY GAS METER
TEMPERATURE
INLET OUTLET
PUMP
VACUUM.
in H|
O
SAMPLE BOX
TEMPERATURE.
ฐF
IMPINGER
TEMPERATURE
-*3L
ZI
.-TV
77
/.at
. 77
33:
ฃ-6
/. '<>
s-v
^
3?
I
/Jl
.si
J-ฃ~l-
CO
^
51
/o
60
1,003
-------
SUMMARY
RECORD OF VISISLE EMISSIONS
Type of Plant G \<
w
n Ii
Company Name
Plant Address ฃ)r\i \TVrar\c Vv
Type of Discharge (STACK]} OTHER _
Discharge Location Rol VPJT Y\ i 11
Date
yซ-ป t
Hours of Observation
Observer
Height of Point of Discharge
Observer's Location:
Distance to Discharge Point
Height of Observation Point
ฉ7
Direction from Discharge Point
Background Description
Weather:
Overcast ' Partly Cloudy Other
, Sky Color
Wind Direction
Plume Description:
Detached: ^^ No
Color: Black 0/hite
Wind Velocity $ "VD mi/hr
Other
Plume Dispersion Bch?vior: Looping
Lofting
Estimated Distance Pluns Visible
Coning
Fumigating
/
Fanning
Other
-------
Company flame
Plant Address
RECORD OK VISIBLE EMISSIONS
f. Date
Observer 0
i I (
Stack Location R.nvVv~ fV>U H, JV Observer
's
Weather Conditions
LV~
1
Location Lv_ \
TIME
COMMENTS
MR
MI r)
SECONDS
00
45
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
*rt!5
55
5
56
5.
57
53
5
59
5
-------
Company Name
Plant Address
RECORD OF VISIBLE EMISSIONS
ป Date
Stack Location
Weather Conditions
1 ^"" S "- / Q
Observer TT, Or
/ M
Location
TIME
HR
ID
MIN
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
V
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
SECONDS
00
5
5
5
s
CT
5
<;
5
5
S
5"
5
5
X
ซ>
5
5
X
5
$
5
T
5
9
5"
S
^
5
5
5"
15
S
S
5"
5
S
5
5
5
5
S
5
5
5"
5
T
5
5"
S
5
S
5
5"
5
S
5
5"
f
?
S:
5
30
5
S
5
S
5
5
5
S
5
5
S
S
S
5
5
i
5
S
5
5
5
5
S
ฃ
^
S
5"
5
5
5
45
S"
5
X
X
ฃ
5
S
$
5
S
5
5"
5
S
5
S
S
S
5T
5
5
5"
r
7
y
ST
5
5
5"
COMMENTS
.
-
t
i
*.
r
I
. i
1
i
i
i
1"
x ~ ploKซ_- 4r-o>n^ rrfWv . 40Of?i .p
' > i ป ' ~
//^ pevfke^O o^-OV-
v^
.
'.
-------
Company Name
Plant Address
Stack Location
Weather Conditions C.1,
RECORD OK VISIBLE EMISSIONS
n,}
Date
Observer
T. 0 .
Observer's
Location
TIME
COMMENTS
10
10
ID
-i.
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
53
59
00
s
7
r
X
S
5
0
0
0
5
5T
5"
5
5"
5
5
5
S
s
5
b
5*
5
S
S
15
S"
^
7
S
5
5
0
b
0
5
t>.
5
S
r
X
5
S
S
9
5
5'
o
5
S
S
30
5
.S"
ST
5
5
5
0
0
0
s*
5-
5
S
S
S
5
5
5
FT
5
S
5
5
S
S
45
r
r
S
S
5
5
H
0
0
S"
S"
b
5"
5"
5
S
S
S"
FT
5"-
S
?
S
S
S
O>-\\4- rOnvj^n OK UL )r\
^ ' i ^-t r ' t ^
Canuovfir
1^-SoV^*---
-
[
X- -pWrvgj. -4Vnvw CTtU^ SOvJv^ta .
\<~* oexc.i<, \v*covi^ '
**"^
-------
Company flame
Plant Address
(
g fty^t >
RECORD OF VISIBLE EMISSIONS
ปOs 0 I i O Date
| ^.""^ ' "
D^b
^bV^wt
Observer O " ' O'i\k \ \ \
Stack Location
Weather Conditions
Observer's
Location
TIME
HR
u
MIN
OQ
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
SECormr
00
s
5
5"
s
^
5
*^
b"
b
S"
T
is
5
CT
s
5
5
5
5
s
5
s
S
s
5
S
5"
5
^
S
15
S
5
?
5"
5T
5
$
S"
S
.9
5
S
5"
5
5
5
5
S
5
5
5
5
5
5
5"
S
5
5"
X
S.
30
T
5
5
S
5
5
r
5"
J
ซ>
5
5
5
S
S
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
S
5
5"
5
5
5"
45
S
-5
5
S
S
S"
S"
5"
i
r
5
5
5"
?
5
S
5
*
5
5
S
S
5
5
S
5
5
5
5
>
COMMENTS
.
i
?
1
!
i
i
.
.
X z: inie/v^fLre^t* -trปr OT^*ป/> yo/^me-.
"ซL \ซ" /
-------
Company Name
Plant Address
Stack Location
*. vV
RECORD OK VISIBLE EMISSIONS
C.Q [ i'/x. Date \ ^ "
Heather Conditions
' ^.Observer "V ป
.
C-f)r>
0
-------
Company Name
Plant Address
Stack Location
Weather Conditions C-Lg
RECORD OF VISIBLE EMISSIONS
Oate
-"""> * '
Observer
Observer's
Location
A>-ซ
TIME
HR
>
ปa
MIN
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
1?
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
SECONDS
00
sr
5"
5"
^
15
5"
5
5"
30
5T
5
5"
45
5"
5T
$
COMMENTS
E^tl *T^v^
,
;
j
f
i
. j
i
i
.
.
-
T
-------
PTFTtJ UA
SAMPLING LOCAT
SAMPLE TYPE ^Ct
RUN NUMBER
OPERATOR /"/g- ฃf
,ป#>*
~/,/;,-.
PROBE LENGTH AND
NOZZLE 10..
ASSUMED MOISTURE.'.
SAMPLE BOX NUMBER
METER BOX NUMBER
.METER AHb
C FACTOR
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
STATIC PRESSURE. IP
FILTER NUMBER IS)
-------
-------
RHCORD OK VISIBLE EMISSIONS
Company
Plant A(
Stack L(
Weather
Name C''^ฃjPrc^ v ^ C*fitoV\r>
Jdress oLvSy nV
jcation fx.C'i'6
/* (
Conditions L^-\f
*C,K^^ (SฐOW
V, v^
Date ^<
^ ^^
vt^Observer V
Observer's
Location
3^ "~ I/ "" / 0
r.o. ox
ten
TIME
COMMENTS
HR
MIN
SECONDS
00
15
45
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
li
57
59
0
0
Q.
0
-------
Company flame
Plant Address
RECORD OF VISIBLE EMISSIONS
lO Date I 3k -g^
Stack Location
fllic Observer 3~ Cb . 0
I /
Weather Conditions
Observer's
Location
TIME
IFF
1
i
MIN
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
?0
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
SECONDS
00
ft
6
O
rt
0
0
O
O
0
0
O
O
O
0
0
O
O
O
0
r>
O
O
0
O
0
0
o
O
0
.O
15
o
0
ft
0
c\
0
O
0
o
o
n
o
o
o
o
0
ft
0
0
o
o
o
0
o
0
0
0
0
o
e>
30
o
0
o
o
0
0
0
o
n
o
0
o
o
0
0
o
o
o
0
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
0
o
o
t)
45
r\
-0
A
o
ft
O
o
0
o
o
o
o
0
o
o
o
o
o
0
o
o
o
o
0
o
o
o
0
0-
0
. COMMENTS
,
'
i
r
]
i
' M
'
i
t
i
i
1
.
t
-------
RECORD OF VISIBLE EMISSIONS
-S-77
Plant Address &-T*^j !ฃ,>
Stack Location IxO' * l/r>v
Weather Conditions Ofฃ
Mill
M^
li>^e.i ^Observer
Observer's
Location
T.D
, 0'
KA
ill
TIME
COMMENTS
ft
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52'
53
54
55
56
57
53
59
00
n
o
o
3
0
o
o
o
0
h
f)
o
0
0
0
o
o
0
0
0
0
o
o
o
o
o
0
o
0
0
0
o
0
o
0
o
0
o
o
f)
o
o
0
o
o
o
0
0
o
r>
45
C
o
o
o
o
o
0
o
0
o
o
o
o
o
0
o
0
o
o
o
o
0
O
O
TV
O
0
O
0
ft
~.
TGC^V /^Ov\ ^
i ^
.
-
i
t
-------
Company flame
Plant Address
Stack Location
RECORD OF VISIBLE EMISSIONS
(oftfirgygv banl \ n__ Date
^rconT
. Observer TjJ O
/y
Weather Conditions
Observer's
Location
TIME
HIT
15
MIN
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
IS
16
17
18
1ฃ
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
SECONDS
00
0
O
0
n
0
6
o
o
o
o
n
o
o
o
o
0
0
6
o
o
o
0
0
o
o
0
f\
A
"N^
f)
c
IS
0
0
o
o
o
n
0
o
O
o
0
o
O
o
o
o
0
o
o
o
o
0
0
0
o
o
0
0
0
6
30
o
o
o
6
r>
0
0
o
0
o
ฉ
0
0
o
0
0
0
n
o
o
o
o
0
0
o
0
o
0
n
0
45
0
o
o
0
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
6
o
o
O
o
n
-6
0
o
0
o
0
o
r>
e>
t>
t>
0
COMMENTS
^rMT*-- C.OfiM r>
Ni
.
1
j
r
1
\
\
i
i
i
)
-------
Company Name
Plant Address
Stack Location
RECORD OF VISIBLE EMISSIONS
*\ Observer TjT . jj .. 0 V
Weather Conditions
rt,
Observer's
Location
TIME
COMMENTS
!?
\"*r
i
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
50
5Q
00
o
o
0
CJ
/"">
o
o
0
0
0
0
0
o
o
0
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
0
6
0
o
Cl
c
o
15
0
o
^
0
0
0
o
0
o
0
o
0
0
0
0
o
o
0
o
o
o
o
o
c
o
o
0
o
o
c
30
c:
o
A
0
0
o
o
6
0
^
o
0
a
o
o
0
0
0
o
o
o
D
r>
C)
o
0
o
o
o
o
45
0
6
0
o
0
o
0
o
n
n
o
o
0
o
o
0
O
0
o
o
0
o
o
D
0
0
<^>
ฐ0
0
o
1
.
1
-------
Company flame _
Plant Address
RECORD OF VISIBLE EMISSIONS
s\ Date
Observer * - D Q ' Xy<9 / //
Stack Location K.f I ' p l) 'j /
Weather Conditions
Observer's
Location
TIME
HR
ft.
Id
MIN
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
V
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
SECONDS
00
r>
r>
o
0
0
0
15
O
o
o
r>
0
0
30
O
o
o
ft
0
o
45
o
o
o
0
o
O
COMMENTS
S4^3>^ Tex>-f ^
r
.
i
ป.
r
i
|
.
-------
PLANT
SAMPLING LOCATI
SAMPLE TYPE
RUN NUMBER
OPERATOR
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE-_ฃ
STATIC PRESSUREi (P,t
FILTER NUMBER Is)
PROBE LENGTH AN
NOZZLE I 0.0
ASSUMED MOISTURE. %
SAMPLE BOX NUMBER
METER BOX NUMBER
-METER AHb
C FACTOR . 1 ซ
PITOT TUBE FACTOR
REFERENCE Ap LJL
NOTE C.C-7- ฃ
.Q J
.. V ~..
READ AND RECORD ALL DATA FtfFRY 3.0 MINUTES
"; VELOCITY
-------
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
E
CLOCK TIME
TIME, mm
GAS METER READING
iVBi. II
3
VELOCITY
HEAD
iAp$i in HpO
ORIFICE PRESSURE
DIFFERENTIAL
(AH), in H?0i
DESIRED
ACTUAL
STACK
TEMPERATURE
iTtl.ฐF
DRY GAS METER
TEMPERATURE
INLET OUTLET
74
PUMP
VACUUM.
in H|
SAMPLE BOX
TEMPERATURE.
IMPINGER
TEMPERATURE
OH-
Si
21
.go
33
76
.11
IX
n
77
77
17
IOJS
Sfc
/D
r. .on
^~r~
:T^
:L
-------
RECORD OF VISIBLE EMISSIONS
Q\ \ f\ Date
Company Name O'
Plant Address D^vAoYtUV^cJU
Stack Location V\nll/K Wi 11 0U Observer's ,-
Observer TV , D . 0 /C/Y? J / '
Weather Conditions
CA
Location
i i
TIME
COMMENTS
.'
.. A.
1,0
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
53
59
00
0
o
o
0
0
0
n
o
0
o
15
0
o
o
o
o
0
0
o
0
r
30
*
0
o
o
o
0
0
o
0
0
n
45
0
0
o
o
o
o
o
o
fS
.
JS4c ."?
i
'
i
-------
Company Name
Plant Address
RECORD OF VISIBLE EMISSIONS
O ' '^. Date
Stack Location
rhn
Weather Conditions
Observer _
Location
TIME
RR
//
MIN
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
StcOflDT
00
O
O
0
o
o
o
0
o
o
a
o
0
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
a
o
o
o
o
o
o
O
o
c
Ib
o
o
o
o
n
o
o
o
o
o
c
0
0
o
0
o
0
o
o
a
a
0
^^^
o
o
o
o
o
O
O
30
C
o
0
o
o
o
o
o
o
n
o
O
o
O
o
o
(7
0
O
o
cr
o
O
O
O
O
0
o
0
45
o
o
o
o
0
0
0
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
a
o
o
o
o
o
0
o
o
o
COMMENTS
"7>?/vr h/)p Jง
.
*
i
i
i
i
i
:
-------
I
Company Name _
Plant Address Tj
RECORD OK VISIBLE EMISSIONS
\
t>
r>
30
O
O
O
O
c?
o
O
O
O
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
0
0
o
O
O
e>
0
o
r>
o
0
45
O
o
0
0
Q
Cj
O
0
0
o
0
o
0
o
o
o
o
o
o
<7>
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
/ .
|*-Bvte( Kol-P fซ,st
CjQo-ftA^ 7*8*4
1
.
-------
Company Name
Plant Address _/0'
Stack Location
RECORD OF VISIBLE EMISSIONS
I Date _
/ 3-6-
________
hYt nc \\ Qgfl. Observer J < D . ft 'ฃ)& ,'//
Weather Conditions
Hi/I
Observer's
Location
TIME
HR
P
MIN
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
T9
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
P9
SECONDS
00
O
o
a
O
(\
O
o
0
0
ft
o
0
ฃ
6
0
o
ฉ~
o
o
0
0
o
0
o
o
o
0
0
o
Ib
o
o
0
0
o
o
0
A
o
0
o
0
o
o
0
c
o
&
o
o
0
0
0
o
0
o
0
o
o
30
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
0
fr
o
o
0
0
o
ฃL
O
b
o
o
0
o
0
r>
o
o
o
0
0
45
0
o
o
t)
0
0
0
o
o
f)
0
0
ft
0
0
o
J&
0
r>
o
0
o
6
0
6
O
O
t>
o
COMMENTS
.
',
\
:
}
. \
1
!
j
1
-------
Company flame
Plant Address
RECORD OF VISIBLE EMISSIONS
ฃ ifc&tsl^ Date
Stack Location
Observer
Weather Conditions
Observer's
Location
HR
PC6
105
WIN
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
SE
00
C\
o
o
Q
Ci
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
0
ft
n
o
D
Ci
c
COMDS
15
rt
0
O
o
n
o
o
0
o
n
o
0
D
0
o
o
o
r>
6
D
o
O
TI.ป
>
30
0
0
n
r>
o
c
n
o
o
r>
o
^>
0
0
0
O
o
o
r>
0
o
0
1E
45
O
O
O
o
rt
o
s
o
o
o
o
r>
0
o
0
6
0
a
o
o
o
0
COMMENTS
.
i
r
i
I
i
i
EH^L T^-f-3
.
-------
APPENDIX B
LABORATORY REPORTS
-------
ANALYTICAL DATA
PLANT
DATE. J^L
SAMPLING LOCATION
SAMPLE TYPE \
RUN NUMBER
SAMPLE BOX NUMBER
CLEAN UP MAN
K
COMMENTS:
FRONT HALF
ACETONE WASH OF NOZZLE. PROBE, CYCLONE (BYPASS).
FLASK. FRONT HALF OF FILTER HOLDER
FILTER NUMBER
1AA-1O
LABORATORY RESULTS
CONTAINER RI NI> \ ft ^OH \S
3j 5*73 .
FRONT HALF SUBTOTAL
m,
.mg
. mg
BACK HALF
IMPINGER CONTENTS AND WATER WASH OF
IMPINGERS. CONNECTORS, AND BACK
HALF OF FILTER HOLDER
ACETONE WASH OF IMPINGERS. CONNECTORS,
AND BACK HALF OF FILTER HOLDER
ETHER-CHLOROFORM
EXTRA^TinN
BACK HALF SUBTOTAL
TOTAL WFIGHT SV6
mg
mg
mg
+**\ "18
MOISTURE
IMPINGERS
FINAL VOLUME "2-^ ฐ
INITIAL VOLUME ^Q0
NET VOLUME _
SILICA GEL
FINAL WEIGHT
INITIAL WEIGHT
NET WEIGHT
ml
ml
TOTAL MOISTURE
SUBTOTAL
-------
ANALYTICAL DATA
PLANT_
-------
ANALYTICAL DATA
SAMPLING LOCATION
SAMPLE TYPE
RUN NUMBER.
SAMPLE BOX NUMBER
CLEAN UP MAN
O
COMMENTS:
FRONT HALF
ACETONE WASH OF NOZZLE. PROBE. CYCLONE (BYPASS).
FLASK. FRONT HALF OF FILTER HOLDER
FILTER NUMBER
LABORATORY RESULTS
CONTAINER
CONTAINER
FRONT HALF SUBTOTAL
S3-7
.mg
BACK HALF
IMPINGER CONTENTS AND WATER WASH OF
IMPINGERS. CONNECTORS. AND BACK
HALF OF FILTER HOLDER
ACETONE WASH OF IMPINGERS. CONNECTORS.
AND BACK HALF OF FILTER HOLDER
MOISTURE
IMPINGERS
FINAL VOLUME _
INITIAL VOLUME <
NET VOLUME _
SILICA GEL
FINAL WEIGHT <
INITIAL WEIGHT .ฃ
NET WEIGHT
^^L.ml
*a& mi
S & Q m'
2/-?.o g
,?oo f
/^ .
CONTAINER
ETHER-CHLOROFORM
EXTRACTION
BACK HALF SUBTOTAL
TOTAL MOISTURE
.mg
.mg
.mg
TOTAL WEIGHT
S-3 .-7
mg
SUBTOTAL
-------
ANALYTICAL DATA
PLANT J
DATE
SAMPLING LOCATION
SAMPLE TYPE
RUN NUMBER <3 A
SAMPLE BOX NUMBER V
CLEAN UP MAN
COMMENTS:
FRONT HALF
ACETONE WASH OF NOZZLE. PROBE. CYCLONE (BYPASS).
FLASK. FRONT HALF OF FILTER HOLDER
FILTER NUMBER
CONTAINER
CONTAINER
.^ A
LABORATORY RESULTS
me
FRONT HALF SUBTOTAL 7 I'U
,mg
.mg
BACK HALF
IMPINGER CONTENTS AND WATER WASH OF
IMPINGERS. CONNECTORS. AND BACK
HALF OF FILTER HOLDER
ACETONE WASH OF IMPINGERS. CONNECTORS.
AND BACK HALF OF FILTER HOLDER
MOISTURE
IMPINGERS
FINAL VOLUME j
INITIAL VOLUME j
NET VOLUME _
SILICA GEL
FINAL WEIGHT .
INITIAL WEIGHT j
NET WEIGHT
of / j ml
3?<90 ml
5*5" ml
y)r
ฃซ!9sJ g
./^"S"" g --
g
g
-t
'i. r
ETHER-CHLOROFORM
EXTRACTION
CONTAINER
BACK HALF SUBTOTAL
mg
mg
fllg
TOTAL WF'GHT ? f ป> ft
mg
TOTAL MOISTURE.
SU8TOIAL
-------
ANALYTICAL DATA
PLANT ฅ2
DATE _ .
SAMPLING LOCATION .
SAMPLE TYPE
RUN NUMBER
SAMPLE BOX NUMBER
CLEAN UP MAN
COMMENTS:
FRONT HALF
ACETONE WASH OF NOZZLE. PROBE. CYCLONE (BYPASS).
FLASK. FRONT HALF OF FILTER HOLDER
FILTER NUMBER _^
LABORATORY RESULTS
CONTAINERRTStฑ\P 1 ft ฐ\\ > 3 m.
CONTAINER ftKT^*' ff 0 Jt5 > 3 mg
FRONT HALF SUBTOTAL
.nig
BACK HALF
IMPINGER CONTENTS AND WATER WASH OF
IMPINGERS. CONNECTORS. AND BACK
HALF OF FILTER HOLDER
ACETONE WASH OF IMPINGERS. CONNECTORS.
AND BACK HALF OF FILTER HOLDER
MOISTURE
IMPINGERS ^
FINAL VOLUME <*7? ml
INITIAL VOLUME *2%> ml
NET VOLUME V> ml
SILICA GEL
FINAL WEIGHT
INITIAL WEIGHT
NET WEIGHT
ETHER-CHLOROFORM
FXTPACTin"
CONTAINER
BACK HALF SUBTOTAL
mg
mg
me
TOTAI *FIRHT Hfi^^
A *
TOTAL MOISTURE
SUBTOTAL
-------
ANALYTICAL DATA
PLANT_ C
DATE_
SAMPLING LOCATION
SAMPLE TYPE f t
RUNNUMBLR_
O t^J
SAMPLE BOX NUMBER 3u_
CLEAN UP MAN.
COMMENTS-
l u \C~ trt
FRONT HALF -
ACETONE WASH OF NOZZLE. PROBE. CYCLONE (BYPASS).
FLASK. FRONT HALF OF FILTER HOLDEF
FILTER NUMBER .s
CONTAINER
CONTAINER
LABORATORY RESULTS
.mg
33.?
FRONT HALF SUBTOTAL
.mg
BACK HALF
IMPINGER CONTENTS AND WATER WASH OF
IMPINGERS. CONNECTORS. AND BACK
HALF OF FILTER HOLDER
ACETONE WASH OF IMPINGERS, CONNECTORS.
AND BACK HALF OF FILTER HOLDER
ETHER-CHLOROFORM
EXTRACTION
BACK HALF SUBTOTAL
TOTAL WEIGHT
.mg
.mg
.mg
.mg
mj
MOISTURE
IMPINGERS ~ ^
.FINAL VOLUME 3 ' P ml
INITIAL VOLUME o?.P O ml
NET VOLUME I < 0 ml
SILICA GEL ^.. ฃT
FINAL WEIGHT ^(!oซ g
INITIAL WEIGHT 2ฎ**. I
NET WEIGHT /Q J K
TOTAL MOISTURE
SUBTOTAL
-------
ANALYTICAL DATA
PLANT.
DATE _
SAMPLING LOCATION
SAMPLE TYPE 1 Q,^
RUN NUMBLR T\J O
vr.i\
J
SAMPLE BOX NUMBER
CLEAN UP MAN (.
FRONT HALF
ACETONE WASH OF NOZZLE. PROBE, CYCLONE (BYPASS).
FLASK. FRONT HALF OF FILTER HOLDER
FILTER NUMBER
COMMENTS:
/"/Vox
CONTAINER
CONTA.NER
LABORATORY RESULTS
-^ F
.ing
FRONT HALF SUBTOTAL
a.a.7
BACK HALF
IMPINGER CONTENTS AND WATER WASH OF
IMPINGERS. CONNECTORS. AND BACK
HALF OF FILTER HOLDER
ACETONE WASH OF IMPINGERS. CONNECTORS.
AND BACK HALF OF FILTER HOLDER
MOISTURE
ETHER-CHLOROFORM
EXTRACTION
CONTAINER
BACK HALF SUBTOTAL
TOTAL YYPiGHT ซ^ซ*
mg
ing
mi
. ป \ mg
IMPINGERS ^ -^
FINAL VOLUME 3 -jD_ ml
INITIAI VniUMF 3-O^> ml
NF_TVnL"MF \ ^O ml
SILICA GEL oil U
FIN&L *Flf.HT &.ljtl g
INITIAL ^FI^.HT e^^ g
NET WEICrHT 1*3 'f g
S
g
g
{
UBTOTAL .
TOTAL MOISTURE,
-------
ANALYTICAL DATA
PLANT _OCG.
OATE_. 1^.1 0:13
SAMPLING LOCATION
SAMPLE TYPE
RUN NUMBER
v> rVi I I
SAMPLE BOX NUMBER
CLEAN UP MAN _
COMMENTS:
FRONT HALF
ACETONE WASH OF NOZZLE. PROBE. CYCLONE (BYPASS).
FLASK. FRONT HALF OF FILTER HOLDER
FILTER NUMBER
CONTAINER
LABORATORY RESULTS
.mg
FRONT HALF SUBTOTAL
^7 1 Q
.mg
.mg
BACK HALF
IMPINGER CONTENTS AND WATER WASH OF
IMPINGERS. CONNECTORS. AND BACK
HALF OF FILTER HOLDER
ACETONE WASH OF IMPINGERS. CONNECTORS.
AND BACK HALF OF FILTER HOLDER
MOISTURE
IMPINGERS ,
FINAL VOLUME e
INITIAL VOLUME _C
NET VOLUME
SILICA GEL
FINAL WEIGHT
INITIAL WEIGHT '
NET WEIGHT
ฑ35
sust*
35
a 13
SOD
V*
ml
ml
ml
g
g
I ,.
ETHER-CHLOROFORM
EXTRACTION
BACK HALF SUBTOTAL
TOTAL WEIGHT
mg
mg
mg
ฃ-7.0 ซ
TOTAL MOISTURE
5ฃ
SUBTOTAL
-------
I I
TITLE
From Page No --
Project No.
_ Book No.
W
73
,/M
m
ftvs
Y$L
\(K
id.
M-l
V./yfl
If
3^0
OCOS
-ZP
,
'Z. /SYS"
ซ56
.^/'
JJ^-
fy
3S
/v-
c&'*L
Saw
107
:
-------
I I
TITLE
" rairTigle S/'
//g.
Project No. '
Book No
- 4, ^ซ~.." -Jl-^ -X,.
12
From Pag* No..
a,eai
riHA.1
CO
Cz)
2
y
o<
r.-' -'" ซ *-
z
3
7
r
.ZI22.
.3062-
.2101
O>
O. t&?i
0'
0.
0,
O. 203*}
0.
O.
0,
O-
0./6/7
(?, /S0?
). 203^r
0.0973
Q.6I23
To
Witncsiod & Understood by me.
Date
Invented by
Dale
Recorded by *.*.,..
-------
Project No.
Book No.
-13
'<&'
't'
6.16515
6, ft ii
0:<
-------
TITLE.
No..
From Page No
(0
..-.fr r ^ - .-.r.i >rRVi"ซ
''
~
; 7W 9xu<^
/f/VJ -//"
2. 25-36
3.0/IZ.
0.H37/'
-2.4470
71
l.f fOf
2.S131
5.71***
"^ ~', -
To
'age No..
Witnessed & Understood by me.
Dale
//-* 75
Invented by
Date
Recorded by
-------
j
t- / ~ J?-ป''5wป*
i& full" dfoniKt-
.iiliฃsfiiSS"!:
-------
APPENDIX C
SAMPLE CALCULATIONS
-------
SAMPLE CALCULATIONS
Test Run 1 #8 Raymond Impact Mill Exhaust Stack - 12-6-78
1. Volume of dry gas sampled at standard conditions (68ฐF, 29-92
in. Hg), dscf.
Vm(std)
17.647 x Y x Vm x ( Pfa +
m
65.04
i/.OH/ x u.yo*t x oy.u/ x( ty-yo > mr J
V
17.647 x 0.984 x 69.07 x(
'm(std) a
(95.
Where: . ..
^m(std) ~ Volume of gas sample measured by the dry gas meter,
corrected to standard conditions, dscf.
V a Volume of gas sample measured by the dry gas meter at
meter conditions, dcf.
Pjj a Barometric pressure, in. Hg.
&H a Average pressure drop across the orifice meter,
in. H20.
T a Average dry gas meter temperature, ฐF.
17-647 a Factor that includes ratio of standard temperature
(528ฐR) to standard pressure (29-92 in. Hg)?ฐR/in. Hg.
Y a Dry gas meter calibration factor.
2. Volume of water vapor in the gas sample corrected to standard conditions, scf.
Vw(std) " (0-0-707 x Vwc) + (0.04715 x W^
Vw(stdj - (0.04707 x 90.01 + CO.04715 x 14.5 1 = 4.92
Where:
Vw(std) = Volume of water vapor in the gas sample corrected to
standard conditions, scf.
V = Volume of liquid condensed in impingers, ml.
-------
- 2 -
wsg
0.04707
Weight of water vapor collected in silica gel, g.
Factor which includes the density of water
(0.002201 lb/ml), the molecular weight of water
(18.0 Ib/lb-mole), the ideal gas constant
[21.85 Un. FfgJ (ft3)/Ob-mole) (ฐR)] . absolute
temperature at standard conditions (528ฐR), absolute
pressure at standard conditions (29.92 in. Hg), f
0.04715
Factor which includes the molecular weight of water
(18.0 Ib/lb-mole), the ideal gas constant
[21.85 (in. Hg)(ft3)/(1b-mo1e)(ฐR)l7 absolute
temperature at standard conditions \528ฐR), absolute
pressure at standard conditions (29.92 in. Hg), and
453.6 g/lb, ft3/g.
3. Moisture content.
ws
w(std)
w(std)
m(std)
ws
Where:
ws
4.92
k. 92 * 65.04
= 0.070
Proportion of water vapor, by volume, in the gas
stream, dimension less.
4. Mole fraction of dry gas.
M
1 - B
ws
M
1 - 0.070
0.930
Where:
Md
Mole fraction of dry gas, dimensionless
5. Dry molecular weight of gas stream, Ib/lb-mole.
MW,
0.440(3C02) + 0.320 (*02) + Q.28Q
+ % CO)
-------
- 3 -
MWd = (O.Mป0 x 0.3 )+ (0.320x21.3 ) -i-[o.280 ( 0.0 +78.4 )]
28.97
Where:
MW, ป Dry molecular weight, Ib/lb-mole.
$C02 ฐ Percent carbon dixoide by volume, dry basis.
%Qj a Percent oxygen by volume, dry basis.
3>N_ ซ Percent nitrogen by volume, dry basis.
%CQ m Percent .carbon monoxide by volume, dry basis.
O.Mป0 ป Molecular weight of carbon dioxide, divided by 100.
0.320 = Molecular weight of oxygen, divided by 100.
0.280 a Molecular weight of nitrogen or carbon monoxide,
divided by 100.
6. Actual molecular weight of gas stream (wet basis), Ib/lb-mole.
MWs - (MWd x' Md) + [18 (1 - Md)]
MW =(28.98x0.930) + [18 (1 -0.930 )]
= 28.20
< ,
Where:
MW = Molecular weight of wet gas, Ib/lb-mole.
18 ซป Molecular weight of water, Ib/lb-mole.
7- Average velocity of gas stream at actual conditions, ft/sec.
vs - 85.^9x0
5 p
x
' r ^ ^
s Cavg)
_
~ * M^
-------
- 4 -
85.49 x 0.850 x 1.319 x
80.0
Where:
ป Average gas stream velocity, ft/sec.
f (131. + 460.^
[JO.09 x 28.20
85-49 * Pi tot tube constant, ft/sec X
r(lb/lb-moTe)(ln.Hg)"U
L (ฐR) (in. H20) j '
C a PJtot tube coefficient, dimensionless
Ap "Velocity head of stack gas, in ^0.
T = Absolute gas stream temperature, R.
P Absolute gas stack pressure, in. Hg.
8. Average gas stream dry volumetric flow rates, dscf/min.
1058.8 xir xA x M. x P
'
n
Qs(std)
o 1058.8x80.0 x : 3.69 x 0.930 x 30.05
V(std) - * ( 131. + A60)
= 14790.
Where:
Q / ,\ ป Volumetric flow rate of dry stack gas, corrected to
t standard conditions, dscf/min.
2
A = Cross-sectional area of stack, ft .
1058.8 = Factor which includes standard temperature (528ฐR) ,
standard pressure (29-92 in. Hg) , and 60 sec/min,
(ฐR) (sec)
(in. Hg)(min) '
9- Isokinetic variation calculated from intermediate values, percent.
-------
- 5 -
17'316 x Ts * Vstd)
v x 6 x P x M. x (D )2
s son
- 17.316 x 591. x 65.04
80.0 x 96.0 * 30.09X 0.930 * .180 )
- 95.6
Where:
I = Percent of isokinetic sampling.
6 = Total sampling time, minutes.
0 ป Diameter of nozzle, inches.
17.316 - Factor which includes standard temperature (528ฐR) ,
standard pressure (29-92 in. Hg) , the formula for
calculating area of circle tf D* ^^t . . f
3 i , conversion of
square feet to square inches ( 144), conversion of
seconds to minutes (60), and conversion to
percent (100), (in. Hg) (in2) (min) .
(ฐR) (ft2) (sec)
10. Particulate concentration, gr/dscf.
C, ป 0.015^32 x M
Vm(std)
C] - 0.015432 x -jgL '
Where:
i
C. a Particulate concentration, gr/dscf.
M ป Total weight of particulate caught by train, mg.
0.015^32 a Conversion factor of gr/mg.
11. Particulate mass emission rate, Ib/hr.
PMRt = 0.008571 k x C1 x Qs(std)
= 0.0085714 x 0.020 x14,790 . 2.49
-------
- 6 -
Where:
PMR = Participate mass emission rate, Ib/hr.
0.0085714 * Conversion factor relating minutes to hours (60), and
grains to pounds (7,000),(Ib) (min)/(gr) (hr).
-------
APPENDIX D
EQUIPMENT CALIBRATION DATA
-------
23
0-K.
-. O.f.
Date ///31/79
Barometric pressure, Pw =33-/J\n. Mg
Box No.,
Ory gas meter llo.
Orifice
manometer
setting,
All.
in. HjO
0.5
1.0
t.s-
4.o
3.o
8.0
Gas volume
wet test
meter
Vw,
ft3
5
5
S"
10
10
10
Gas volume
dry gas
meter
vdซ
ซ3
JS"7. 30?
d&3. SS~S
P.-.J. i-J-J
-3i7, V V-3
i67? T,;^
j ? 2 . ' 3 e
J$ <-f /i/o
^S-V.^6
e?-9V ฃC~
Temperature
Wet test
Meter
tw,
ฐF
^^
fjซซ
"^o-^
ffJ&&
fJ^^
Dry gas
Inlet
^i*
ฐF
7^,
?*L
***>,
^^5
?^^
"%
Outlet
^0-
ฐF
707,
7a
73-,-
' '7y
^7V7y
^^
ปK77
meter
Average
td.
ฐF
75.^
77 ^J
7^.5^
Sd/7
5rJ.^^
Time
0,
min
/J.5V
7,95
sr./t
/V. 7V
ti/rs
Average m ^
Y
2Z.
AH@
^OTJ"^
Calculations
Ml
0.5
1.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
AM
13.6
0.0368
0.0737
0.147
0.294
0.431
0.588
Y
Vw PD (td + "60)
\/ /D j. ^" \ /f x /icnl
Vd^pb + ]2.6] Vw /
. 9ฃ3
.^F1^-/
. Jtt"?
. ?7/*"?
.9&7J
All|J
0.0317 AH f(tw + 460) 9] 2
Pb (td + 460} (_ Vw J
/.^5?7?
^.03^7
^.^^^X
3.//XO
3. S533
Y = Ratio of accuracy of wet test meter to dry test meter. Tolerance = ฑ 0.01
= Orifice pressure differential that gives 0.75 cfm of air at 70ฐ F and 29.92
inches of mercury, in. I^O. Tolerance - - 0.15
-------
Date
Barometric pressure, Pb =;lljl3n. Hg
Box No.
Dry gas meter No.
Ori f ice
manometer
setting,
. All,
in. H20
0.5
1.0
*jr
4-0
6.0
8.0
Gas volume
wot test
meter
Vw.
ft3
5
5
*}$'
10
10
10
das volume
dry gas
meter
V
ft3
. Lffti, O^t~J
tiz.03?
QI s-.uia
OiJ-.fe'i'J
Temperature
Wet test
Meter
twt
ฐF
"*V
6> -
''""< V,
""si
5S ,,
-1 ss
Dry gas
Inlet
tdi-
ฐF
f/
8*K
*^
f<"h,
1M-v,
Outlet
'do-
ฐF
^y
-ป*
7C-"-,,
J3^,V
?%S,S
meter
Average
td.
ฐF
7%
-------
Date
Barometric pressure, PJ, =JgvT, r", oo
J3ฃ-. VoV
O.? 5=. -7TP
.'i'V. 7 J~J,
,VT/. JO-/
Temperature
Wet test
Meter
twป
ฐF
IV? -j .
/y 7c^
/07<5
^^^
^'V'/
>0-^f
Dry gas meter
Inlet
ldi.
ฐF
!JJ
^*
^^. .
7"
'~*,rt
oa
'v ".,ซ
^a>
"* 111
Outlet
tdo*
ฐF
'^77
"fiV;-..
"^V*
'-
-------
Date
Barometric pressure, Pj, ^VC-n. Hg
Box No..
Dry gas meter No.
Orifice
manometer
setting,
AH.
in. HjO
0.5
1.0
/,ST
ซ3.o
J-o
8.0
Gas volume
wet test
meter
Vw.
ft3
5
5
10
10
10
10
Gas volume
dry gas
meter
V-
ft3
^07. io&
< i tii f)~t*
^/j.o^y
e/S.rt^*'/
v-*X V /"If* f?
ซ?Ci. o-c 7
C7-J..J ? 1 C
h?-?-?. 5 /ซ?
r-t ....."-',-.
Temperature
Wet test
Meter
^Wt
ฐF
C^^r
"-7.-,?
*v-rCT
0>4; ^.-,
efc.
^^g^r.
Dry gas
Inlet
tdi-
ฐF
*^yo
rr<^
^>,,
^.v
'Ho
'tfir'
"ซ.V
Outlet
tdo-
ฐF
rซ -,
^7
fc*7/ซ
7y^,c
"p^r<
tf6~?
meter
Average
td.
ฐF
7x.r?
l?ijfj
^-f ^ j
77/7
/M.50
Time
0,
min
6.?
AllL3
0.0317 All f(tw * 460) el 2
Pb (fcd + 460) L Vw J
/, 7 ฃ7 A
/,
-------
OMAUMTMHMm SHEET.
OF.
CHKD BY*.
. ROJECT_
DATE
W.O. NO..
SUBJECT
OaAS \oy>\\o
,>,
f ^. '.l
M-L--U
O'-l_ A- I i" ' '" :**',! 'I -='-j tf*
r,Jvvv!^_L-:: l -' ! fr i - s\
JTT> -tts-;^ a.^0 "j. .o At.l.q.JAV^6U^l5A^\J:_C^.i^^
T
! - 2: --
,^Z. : t
>v
~r
r
j .--.r i-c.--v
""" .:J:^"iIO^fztetii:]^tlJ .tJ.iJj
I
f W. 231-9 -6
-------
BY
CHKD BY.
PROJECT.
SUBJECT.
._ DATE.
_ DATE.
WY73 ,T7>*~ r\n
,- ., Vcl^SLfc--vjd
.Itb
r/> /AY?^?/^. *//>-."
ZT
vv n f.'O
V ป ซ \J . 1 * <^X .
j: - ,/?/
7T - ,/2
T -/-
/] - '! $
A/(fป^7,i<>T'<^--C
aซ
26
IE = , K-
(-> __^j
v'j~tia,vM***i
7
~5^-, 36s"
"VZ"
-------
pn
v_^v_^JL
1C
Rffettler
INSTRUMENT CCfiP3!<*TlCN
ItCMMICIAN
' .. -..". "' - ':'.'.: ^ ' ^'.^'~..:^ '; ^'' '''
:.'.: .::, . : . -r- v-V ."V -.-.* ':."
*. : n* " ' ' * *
^. .*:!- - ;:. -. "*" .. "
."'' ^ . -."...
a , 4 fj A
H SERIES ANALYTICAL BALANCES . [
-'-- - *' Jtf '- "' '.*
' . * "v :"' f.'.icit) Semi Micro "?
... !;" ..!'! ^|K, '''.'. H51 . ?4 H51AH
.'."- '" /*.':'"; ::-^ ' '" '' Ci' > *? r^-?-"""*
' SPECIAL'FEATUR'ES '..v-'W/h.'?' :-''-~>: ~" '' - -optical tare v;iJ~ release .
' WEIGHING RANGE-". .. j---:A-:V vj; 0-20g-. . 0-160fl.vj;.j>l .0-160 g -
;' Capacity .''-,>:.;':."- r"-.~,^' 20g ..." ' 1 60.1 g -C.vVf.--li 160.1 g
READ ABILITY '-..' ,. .': . .--,. 0.001 mg 0.01 mg -:'!:- :,>. 0.01 mg
, Precision (standard (Jeviation) ..-; =0.001 mg =0.01 mg .'.:ซ =0.01 mg
Optical scale range . - ' ' . -0.5 to -r- 20.0 mg -5 to tl25 mg. -5to-rl25
1 scale div. - - "-. '. ". 0.1 mg .1 mg '.-::;-; _'ฃ 1 mg
Dijilal micrometer. : n div. = ' ' 0.005 mg :0.01 mg ,".>:;..V 0.01 mg
'Taring- . .---..; -'':."'..-:. -;?-.?i3
By seninj optical scale to zero' :.' ' . 0.1 g _>-..r"-;-;.i* 0-1 9 '
By use of built-in weight-set ." I9.99g" 1S9.9g* /-Vv I59.9g'
.. Buin-in weights .> ./.'' -.. 19.99 g . 159.9 g v'-.v-- ..r 159.9 g
Accuracy .:--: . -- ".- \J ฑ0.02 mg . ฑ0.1 mg ."'!- ~i =0.1 mg
' "1 (SaSrg step'" ""'". .:.'. 0.01 g '0.1 g i r.i .'-.-j.. 0.1 g
' Balance housinj Base . " . " tSV> x 15H in. .Sn x 20 m.-.-::.^ SM x 20 in.
"'.-.:-.. Height ':- '-. HBVi in. 16inf;>*-'r:'-'TA. 16""-
Weighing chamber Base ..,.-.- :/J 9x6 in. MS _6*\8hiฃ$ฃฃ 6%xBnu
" "-.""-i:~'s..-.i Height V':_^"-",ji MSS-'A: access port : BTn..^.^^^ .8 in.. .'/;
' :' ."^''l~'-Af-";-.-V.--iJ?.r-r/'--ra cBameler = 2ft in. Kr^v-^V-lfi;^.--'''.'-^-.
'.-;"''.".Z;i.iv'^7'i'C--z.:..'r-i"V.'-;i height 114 in. f-'i*?'.fe3?5jics^3-*.:-"-v-r-"
". Weighing pan Oiimetsr -"-.. *ฃ MS: 1% in. '3%Tn-':i5iv-^ 3V4 in, ..
rtl- -::-. Pan-bow height :" i' M5S/A: 1V4 in. ' '/iB'.^Jis^'Si ?.'"-,-
Vr---'v'v:i ^;"-:?-'--: --"vrf M5:4V4in. -'- ^^ ci^Wil'^- *-J-
: ":;.r" "'",-' -.'''^ :-<"''"; M5S/A:3%in. ' *.-?;>-. Nv^-* -'=
--wersuppry . ' ' W - 4 110-220 V . -1 10-220 V :..-;-;. "ฐ-22ฐv
;-.- --.....:-...-'-:-. so-eoHz ' so-ec ป: ?:i ซ-ซ>* _
Ne1ป-e.^tl -.- .-. ..: 29 to 24ft. -"-.; .
Pices EllKtwMjrchl.1976 : 5050./5445. 1850: :" "-%:?. 192S-
.: - --
O
1 r"
:
iiiQ N77"
i j
""''-'
~,x ' :
' . -.
1 " H35AR ..
';_ -full range .-
{"'J'preweigb -
j/"J'releass ' .:
-_ซIull range '
*~~\ari"-i- ; '
>'.-'r>l50g".^.:
; 'I70g ":"!w.'! '>
- 0.1 'mg
=0.05 mg .-
; Oto 1000 mg
" 10 mg
. 0.1 mg :
" 159 gt-'-" '
: 1ฃ9fl..:.'-... -
;..=0.18mg'
ฃi^S^:
'r."zฃ:&&3ฃ;'$
r^'.-^-Z^*-*-'
Z^^-y.
!~ --.-? TV-- r.; :'-
mi
110-220V- '.'
50-60 Hz
. 26 tt> ; "
1995. ..
"- Jt
'
j ; .0
*
,.. .,...
% Economy
s"
f H8
|. ;....-;.
\ .vernier
_ ' readout
* "0-160 g '-
T! 160 g
": 0.5 mg
= 0.3 mg
". -50 to 1250 mj
10 mg
159 g
v 159 g .
i .ฑ1 mg
^ 9V4x18in. '
- 16 in. -
^ 6% x 8 in. ;
H " * "" "
ป^Vr-~"-- ^.-:;
^ 3%ซ:
i Tin.. .:/-
. 110-220 V
- ฃ0-50 Hz
24 a>
S95.
...
O . O
u , ^..,
1 ^
1 It ป
.
' Tf
-. '-. -1
'. ^ H72 . '. /ฃ H78AH
:. . -.-..'': '/''. rele'ase
full range" .* full range
'preweigh- " ;.i preweigh
~0-l60g' -". "i 0-1 60 g
160 g .; "> 160 g
0.1 mg ~ ? 0.1 mg
=0.05 mg " ฑ0.05 mg
) 0 to 1030 mg ; 0 to 1000 mg
10 mg . ': 10 mg
0.1 mg _ 0.1 mg
159 g' '4 159 g
: 159 g . . ; 159 g
=0.25 mg " 4 ฑ0.25 mg
'lg . :.-':ซ lg
f 9% x 18 in. v? SV4 x 20 in.
" -16 in. : -''.i 16 in.
f . 6% x 8 in.-. -'-;4 6% x 8 in.
;'B 'ai.:; -J:. ^ :^ 8 in. .
' 31i in.;.' i ''^^ 3% in.
110-220 V 'i 110-220 V
50-60 Hz.'' V'5 50-60 Hz
24 tt> '"..- ft 2416.
'1095.'':' ---'-3 1195.
'WiSioul separate tare fndicatjon
' readout bejins at zero rejartless at ta/e used
I
-------
APPENDIX E
PROJECT PARTICIPANTS
-------
The following Weston employees participated in this project:
Peter J. Marks
Department Manager
Laboratory Services
Barry L. Jackson
Supervisor Air Testing
Jeffrey D. O'Neill
Assistant Project Scientist
Gregory L. CeJ iano
Assistant Project Scientist
Charles Dobroski
Laboratory Technician
Theodore B. Moxon
Laboratory Technician
Richard J. Urban
Laboratory Technician
John Wi11iams
Laboratory Technician
David N. Maloney
Laboratory Technician
econENVIRONomics Division
econENVIRONomics Division
econENVIRONomics Division
econENVtRONomics Division
econENVIRONomics Division
econENVIRONomics Division
econENVIRONomics Division
econENVIRONomics Division
econENVIRONomics Division
Others:
Dennis P. Holzschuh
Technical Manager
Emission Measurement Branch
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
APPENDIX F
OPERATIONS LOG
-------
No.
IMP MILL DAILY OPERATION REPORT
RED GRADE
D -
PRODUCT GRADE
CLAYFROM
PRODUCT TO
^a.
TIME
% MOIST.
PRODUCT TO
STARTED
STOPPED
10
11
i 12
AVE.
OPR. TIME
OPR. -'.
i> o
10
AVE.
OPR. TIME
/
OPR:';'-- '-'-"-/ '
11
12
AVE.
OPR. TIME
-------
No.
IMP MILL DAILY OPERATION REPORT
RED GRADE
Dotซ --.
/. *;?
PRODUCT GRADE
CLAY FROM
'.'T-'- 'X /'.'../ ^?1 .*ป,-.-
PRODUCT TO
TIME
% MOIST.
PRODUCT TO
STARTED
STOPPED
SPEED
10
n
12
AVE.
OPR. TIME
OPR.
10
AVE.
OPR. TIME
tfT
11
H'o*
12
AVE.
OPR. TIME
OfR.
A CLEANER PLACE IS A SAFER PLACE ^ |f
-------
-.. I
'JNo.
ROLLER MILL DAILY OPERATION REPORT
s^w-
TIME
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
FEED- GRADE * ^ PRODUCT GRADE ? , ^/ > ^
GRIT
t f o
JO 6 t
''IL'':' '
fc&ซ
ซf*.V
/ปป<*&
ป v*.**.
AVE.
MOIST
-r'1
/ *
' .'
.!.' **
' '*
J * ^
; '
iREEVES^
!^^S:'
- * . .- ' '
i
'::*f"\-;;: *
PRODUCT TO
5^1 ^l^o
' ' t
'. ' ; :', ':' ฐ -''-'
. ซ ,
TIME
.STARTED
.y,>-ป ;
." "' -' '
n
: ^
,-,- . , .''..''.;'" '. "
'-.-"" " . " ' *
^%3V
STOPPED
5*1*0 O
, ' '' ."--
3;*"ซ, &.:...
"-','.-: ' ,
REMARKS
Ift^JSC, ^ v
^k H5 H
A 0 ฃ ?t*t
'. ..' ' '
' "''. ''' - ','
:'' . ,.:'< - :
/
-:-. . v -\ ;-".- ....... :. . '-., /';..'' "'''''''': S '-
/*, i r r '
I ^M> N>
TONS/HR.
TONS PRODUCT
OPERATOR
10
AVE.
OPR. TIME
TONS/HR. ?'
TONS PRODUCT
\
OPERATOR
M
12
AVE.'
OPR, TIME
^. A\'i- - "^
TONS / HR.
TONS PRODUCT
OPERATOR
TOTAL OPR. TIME
TONS / HR.
TONS PRODUCT
-------
NO.
ROLLER MILL DAILY OPERATION REPORT
FEED GRADE
PRODUCT GRADE
TIME
GRIT
MOIST
REEVES
PRODUCT TO
TIME
STAR
STOPPED
REMARKS
3> f
8
o
11
12
$3
AVE.
OPR. TIME
TONS/MR.
TONS PRODUCT
OPERATOR
;; -ft '
J&f.f.lJ*
> *>-/>
10
AVE.
OPR. TIME
.-3L
TONS/HR.
TONS PRODUCT
OPERATOR*
.-> ^
11
f/.^o
12
AVE.'
OPR. TIME
TONS/HR.
TONS PRODUCT
OPERATOR
TOTAL OPR. TIME
TONS
TONS PRODUCT
-------
NO.
ROLLER MILL DAILY OPERATION REPORT
J
TIME
-" '7'"' '
' '8 :
9
. 10
11
-'*ป''
, '..' 1 '
'',' 2 "
FEED GRADE - * - PRODUCT GRADE > g# f -+ T^ A
GRIT
*"
r
i
AVE.
MOIST
i
'
>
REEVES
^
.s
t.
V.
"
,r
PRODUCT TO
'
* '
V
* -
t *
* ^
: 'v
TIME
STARiti)
t ;
^
STOPPED
:
V
'1
It
^
j
~ . *
'
REMARKS
*
-
*
*
i
4
jk .
OPR. TIME
TONS/HR.
TONS PRODUCT
OPERATOR
/)
n
;*,
10
AVE.
OPR. TIME
OPERATOR
TONS/HR.
TONS PRODUCT
11
o o
**>
12
6
AVE. "
OPR. TIME
TONS AHR.
TONS PRODUCT
OPERATOR
TOTAL OPR. TIME
TON8/HR.
TONS PRODUCT
-------
NO.
ROLLER MILLPAILY OPERATION REPORT
' V -f'' ' -' ' '' - ****+
: -^ . - Date. '' s*- -* **
TIME
'l
9
9
10
11
12
1
2
FEED GRADE PRODUCT GRADE (-. ' '^f*"".
GRIT
^ 76
/CftCx
ll&
*") Vi "^
r^iv
S-?9.-"
/^^ T>t>
I^^^Q
AVE.
MOIST
\**1
1^
t ป ^.
V* fe
/ป!l
V^;;
S; ^
^.. ^
REEVES
^'^"0 .
iU
'_'.-.' . '; '
OPR. TIME ฃ5- V\ CV*
PRODUCT TO
S/i"i2/^o
'.--/ '
' * ' Ji '''.''''' ~ * '
':. ; .-. ' -.- .. -. .'
.
' .;' " ;.;"" '
- "-' ..''' - .'
^:sv
STOPPED
2C ^
- .
'. . '.
' ''^'':.
'. '.":/:/ '-''' ''
REMARKS
' -
1- 1
6r\ 6' It
t f>r^
: .,....,'
-'- .' ' ' ',
. ' ' ''.''" ;'''.'' ' .. - ,-'! .
TONS/HR. TONS PRODUCT
WLt^rt ' ''''' '" '" ''' : '
OPERATOR -
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
AVE.
j . ''..:- -
. . ',,
?>#$
%jT&
OPR. TIME / fr?L
ff$i-bi
J~ & ~ ฅ$
^"ฃ3-1?
' ' " '"'. ,-
- '' ' -- .# 'ฃ'
;>'*)','
; 30
'. - 1
//;^^
' . /'
TONS / HR. TONS PRODUCT '
' ' "*" ' :
---s .''.." ' . - .
, S . , : ...
OPERATOR _x} ]}**&,ฃ>*" . . ' .-..'
11 S
12 S
1
2
3
4
6
6 ป
)" H d
' ^,,<
7Po
AVE.
& c%
''* / ^
%*c&
ซ-
s! ฃ &**'.
.
*>) S**v i
* ^ u T
OPR, TIME^Pi^^ "..ซ'' '^
i-i- ^ -.^JP<'.'"J* " ' ' ' ' ''"
TOTAL OPR. TIME . TONS/HR. TONS PRODUCT
-------
SUPGRADJ
DRYER m\X OPERATIOOEPOBI
' DATE /** ' ป *
sir
TIME
Slip
Flit.
CfltfX
Vac.
RPM
Molit
Drop
Hr.
ST
From
Grad
For
Tons
Lost
Rcfflarici and' Explanation
of Delays
7A.M.
8:00
9:00
tftOO
11:00
12:00
1:00
< 2:00
:**X*
AVG.
.
Oryw Operating Noun: /
Total Torn Fed:
Filter Hour*:
A_ C_
ft ' D_
Total.
Avg
/T/niK HF . ~ 9, }
Explanation of Dซgradthg and/or Loueir
Gas Meter at Start -
3o/B ^
3P.M.
4:00
5:00
4:00
'7:00
8-.00
7:00
10:00
AVG.
Dryer Operating Houn
V
: "vj
Toปol Tons Fซ*
*X T
Filter Mount
A C
1:00
Av8. T/FIIti Hr.
Explanation of Degrading ana/or Loiiej:
2:00
3:00
ioo '
f
^,
6tOO
-55
AVG.
Dryer Operating Houni
Totol Tore Fed
/IT~ 'O
Filter Houru
A
*'___
Totol.
. Hr.
Explanation of Oenrodinq ana/or LOMM:
Preuei Fed
Operator
Gas Meter at Start -
^^^IK^SS^riMSI^I^^
-------
SUP GHADE
DRYER DAILY OPERATIOH REPORT
TIME
7A.M.
8:00.
9iOO
10-.00
tlKป
12-.00
IiOO
' 2:00'
"AVG.
SP. jff.
Slip
'9W
Flit.
jw-C
. Filter Hour*
.A = "o< -
' V' '' ' .' o ".-
Total
3 P.M.
4:00
5:00
6:00
7:00
8:00
9:00
. 10:00
AVG.
_ ^ *
*
Filter Houns
A. - ' - .C ' "
' B " '
':.b '
Total . '
11 P.M.
12:00
1:00
2:00
3:00
', 4M) ?
5:00
4:00'
'AVG.
_ ;
' i .
'.
Filter Hour.: ..
- - A ' - C ' '
ป ' ' D . '
Total*
Temp.
*>' '',
>
Voe.
^j
KPM
V V*'
,"l
-Prod.
Moist
^y,
/
PW
;?*
A
;-, /
'V-
j
5Mln
Drop
ซ-
4-
s
v.
, v>..
TonV
Hr.
?*;
7'if
?t
t*
r~
Feed
From
^Jl^Q
1'
:ป'
^
' . '^. '. / '
Dryer Operattno Houn: to
Avg. T/Fllt. Hr 7 - iT- -
'pnmoFed ป''''"'" - '' '
Operator V*'
oS
t
./
;.
'' ป :
/_
^
.''
3$
&%
?<&
ป6fi
^
fa,
fa
,'
f.6
U
;'..
y
&+#
^
*^r
x".-
x
Dryer Operating. Hours: cf
AVQ-: T/Mlt. Hr. '
Prena Fed Jf.
' ' - - - /'^ '"' '
Operato7~>ty>E>-ป -xt ~&*&-&-v~*~^.
* fj ^.
1
)
V- '
.'"' J
^
i&x
' r
Crtf*>
I'?,*
'X^"'
Ifo^f
f
ป f*.
fa*
.. _*
g;.-
8'v
'/
>
,t-
fc
ffa
^c
ro
i5W
,ปrป.
i
i ,
. .-. . . ;.- .:-. ^.<7':.. . ;;.
' Dryer Operating Koun: ''' ',' '
Avoซ T/F!lt. Hr. ', ' ' Q, &
Prenei Fed [/ // :
Operate^ >jyv "SfaffiTZT
Prod.
To^
Si
/ .
ปป
Grade
For
Tfjti
^K
M
-i
ft-
fy
-&
Toni
Lost
f-
'
r4T.
Remorki and Explanation
of Delayi
. . ป
' .
: - ' ' '
'"'. '-''-' '" s .
' \ " " ' ' "
Total Tonป Fed: ' $*.f^ j2>
Explanation of Degrading ana/or LoiMt:
Gas Meter at Start - ;
* "'
.- '
/ '. -,; '''
/ lฃ t)
Total Tonป Fed **< X^ ' .',. .
.<
' Explanation af Degrading and/or Louซt:
. ' , ' ' ' ' ' . ' .
Gas Meter at Start -
I
^^^^ 'v(- :.'ซ*
-------
/. We
-7,7
P.O. |(o
H P HY&
64 T3ป/
10
A /
*.
Z. - J-L.
C Y=M
4 .S^
-
- a O O C
c.
------- |