United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards
Research Triangle Park NC 27711
EMB Report 79-GLS-5
October 1979
Air
v>EPA Glass Manufacturing
Emission Test Report
Guardian Industries
Kingsburg, California
-------
FINAL REPORT
2688-01-1079
Emission Test Report
Guardian Industries
Kingsburg, California
EPA Contract No. 68-02-2813
Work Assignment No. 38
Prepared For:
Environmental Protection Agency
Emission Measurement Branch
ESED, Mail Drop #13
Research Triangle Park, N.C. 27711
October 3, 1979
by
SCOTT ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY, INC.
2600 Cajon Boulevard
San Bernardino, California 92411
Scott Environmental TechnoVxjv 'or
-------
#2688-01-1079
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page Number
1.0 INTRODUCTION - - 1-1
2.0 SUMMARY OF RESULTS — 2-1
3.0 PROCESS DESCRIPTION 3-1
4.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES 4-1
APPENDIX A - PARTICULATE, S02> AND S03 RESULTS A-l
APPENDIX B - FIELD DATA SHEETS ' — B-l
Scott Environmental Technology Inc..
-------
#2688-01-1079
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Testing to determine emissions from the Guardian Industries
Glass Plant in Kingsburg, California was conducted by Scott Environmental
Technology, Inc. for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under Contract
No. 68-02-2813, Hork Assignment No. 38. The testing was conducted from
September 18 through September 21, 1979.
Particulates, SOp. SO.,, and opacity were determined at the outlet
of the electrostatic precipitator controlling emissions from the glass-melting
furnace. The standard EPA Method #5 particulate train was modified by heating
the particulate collection filter to 350°F, rather than the standard 250°F, to
avoid any hydrolysis of sulfate particulate. A Reeve Angel 934 AH glass filter*
was used in the sampling train because it is suspected that some other filter
types contain trace impurities that react with SOp present in the gas stream
to form particulate. Additional testing was also conducted to compare the
effects of filter type and filter temperature on the results. Simultaneous
samples were collected with two sampling trains with first one train using a
Reeve Angel filter and one using a Gelman AE filter, both heated to 350°F,
and then with one train with the filter heated to 350°F and one train with
the filter heated to 250°F, both using a Reeve Angel filter. SOp and SO- were
also measured in conjunction with one of the particulate samples.
Test arrangements were made through Mr. Jeff Jacobson, Plant
Engineer. Mr. Dan Bivins of the EPA was present during the tests, as were
Mr. King Yu and Mr. Bill Herring of the EPA. Mr. Tom McCabe of Pacific
Environmental Services was also present to monitor the plant process during
the tests.
Mention of trade names is not an endorsement by EPA.
Scott Environmental Technology Inc.
-------
#2688-01-1079
2.0 SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Four (4) test runs were made to determine the particulate emissions,
The particulates were measured by EPA Method #5 with the filter heated to
350°F instead of 250°F, and using a Reeve Angel 934 AH glass fiber filter.
Results of Runs #2, 3 and 4 are summarized below in Table 2.1. Results
from Run #1 are not considered representative because the sample was
apparently contaminated during the test. Complete results of all the test
runs are included in Appendix A. Field data sheets are included in
Appendix B.
TABLE 2.1
Summary of Particulate Results
Electrostatic Precipitator Outlet
Run No.: 234
Date: 9-18-79 9-19-79 9-19-79
Time Started: 1715 0845 1520
Time Ended: 1940 1125 1851
Particulate Concentration,
Grains/scf (dry) 0.0156 0.0143 0.0230
Particulate Mass Flow
Rate - Ibs/hr 5.22 4.70 7.59
Results of the opacity readings taken at the electrostatic
precipitator outlet during Runs #2, 3 and 4 are summarized in Tables 2.2, 2.3
and 2.4. The plume was detached from the stack. Readings varied from 5 to 15
percent, averaging 10 percent. Occasional momentary readings of 30 percent
were noted, apparently caused by rapping in the precipitator. Opacity field
data sheets are included in Appendix C.
Additional testing was performed to compare the effects of sampling
with two types of filters, a Reeve Angel 934 AH and a Gel man AE, and of sampling
at two different filter temperatures, 250°F and 350°F. For these tests, sampling
was conducted simultaneously at the center of the stack with two trains. During
Scott Environmental Technology Inc.
-------
#2688-01-1079
2-2
TABLE 2.2
SUMMARY OF RESULTS OF OPACITY READINGS
Location: Precipitator Outlet
Test Run No.: 2
Date: 9-18-79
Color of Plume: White
Stack Height: 75 feet
Distance to Stack: 100 feet
Wind Direction:VariableSpeed: 0-10 mph
Sky Description: Clear
Set Time Opacity
Number Start . End Sum Average
1 1711 1717 265 10
2 1719 1725 220 10
3 1731 1737 180 10
4 1744 1750 185 10
5 1754 1800 140* 5
6 1805 1811 155 5
7 1813 1819 120 5
8 1822 1828 120 5
Overall Average: 5
*21 readings
Set Time Opacity
Number Start End Sum Averaae
Scott F-nvironmental Technology inc.
-------
#2688-01-1079
2-3
TABLE 2.3
SUMMARY OF RESULTS OF OPACITY READINGS
Location: Precipitator Outlet
Test Run No.: 3
Date: 9-19-79
Color of Plume: White
Stack Height: 75 feet
Distance to Stack: 100 feet
Wind Direction: S-SE Speed: 0-10 mph
Sky Description: Clear
Set
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14 .
15
16
Overall
Time
Start
0833
0841
0854
0907
0920
0936
0947
1001
1010
1020
1035
1049
1109
1116
1123
1132
. End
0839
0847
0900
0913
0926
0942
0953
1007
1016
1026
1041
1055
1115
1122
1129
1138
. Opacity
Sum
290
290
315
285
275
295
240
285
300
250
235
240
250
280
250
265
Average:
Average
10
10
15
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
Set Time Opacity
Number Start End Sum Averaae
•
f \ \ '
r r"n ;-\ n'tO""! *"
-------
#2688-01-1079
2-4
TABLE 2.4
SUMMARY OF RESULTS OF OPACITY READINGS
Location: Precipitator Outlet
Test Run No.: 4
Date: 9-19-79
Color of Plume: White
Stack Height: 75 feet
Distance to Stack: 100 feet
Wind Direction: SE-SW Speed: 0-10 mph
Sky Description: Clear
Set
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Overal
Time
Start
1504
1515
1523
1533
1552
1603
1618
1635
1641
1652
1705
1724
1740
1754
1812
1 Average
End
1510
1521
1529
1539
1558
1609
1624
1641
1647
1659
1711
1731
1746
1800
1818
•
. Opacity
Sum
240
265
265
255
235
300
235
250
230
225
250
235
220
230
185
Average
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
Set Time Opacity
Number Start End Sum Averaae
-------
#2688-01-1079 2-5
Runs #5, 6 and 7, one train used a Reeve Angel filter at 350 F and one used
a Gelman filter at 350°F. During Runs #8, 9 and 10, both trains used Reeve
Angel filters, one at 250°F and one at 350°F. S02 and SO. were also measured
as part of one of the sets of particulate tests. A fuel oil sample was taken
during the S0? and SO- sampling and analyzed for sulfur content by Saybolt
and Company, Inc. Results showed a sulfur content of 0.67% by weight.
Results of Runs #5, 6 and 7, comparing two filters, are summarized
in Table 2.5. The total particulate mass flow rate is shown as well as the
particulate mass flow rate collected on the filter only since any difference
in results should be reflected on the filter catch. The results do show a
trend of higher particulate with the Gelman AE filter as compared to the Reeve
Angel 934AH filter. Since the gas flow rate at the sampling point was higher
than the average flow rate in the stack, the average velocity head from the
previous tests was used to calculate the gas flow rates and particulate mass
flow rates for Runs #5, 6 and 7.
Tests results for Run #5 with the Gelman filter are not included
since this sample was apparently contaminated similar to the Run #1 sample.
Complete results of Runs #5, 6 and 7 are included in Appendix A, with field
data sheets included in Appendix B.
Results of Runs #8, 9 and 10, comparing a Reeve Angel filter heated
to 250°F with a Reeve Angel filter heated to 350°F are summarized in Table 2.6.
As with the previous results, the gas flow rate and particulate mass flow rate
are calculated based on the average velocity in the stack rather than the
velocity at the sampling point. The results show generally higher particulate
loading with the filter heated to 250 F as compared to heating to 350°F,
similar to the trend noted for the two different filter types.
Results of the S0? and SO- determinations are summarized in
Table 2.7. The S02 and S03 were collected as part of the sampling train with
the 250°F filter during Runs #8, 9 and 10.
Opacity readings taken during Runs #5, 6, 8 and 9 are summarized
in Tables 2.8 through 2.11. The readings were very similar to those taken
during Runs 1 through 4, averaging 10 percent. Readings were not taken during
Runs 7 and 10 because these runs were made at night.
Scort Environmental Technology Inc.
-------
y =**=
n ro
O CT<
m TABLE 2.5 ?
3 o
^ SUMMARY OF RESULTS COMPARING REEVE ANGEL V
§ 93^ AH AND GELMAN AE FILTERS - 9-20-79 £
b
£. Filter Type: Reeve Angel 934 AH Gelman AE
^ Run No.: 5 67 6 7
Time Started: 0950 1510 1930 1510 1920
Time Ended: 1130 1640 2055 1537 2045
Total Particulate 7s
Concentration, gr/scf (dry) 0.0130 0.0146 0.0096 0.0191 0.0282 °^
Total Particulate Mass Flow
Rate, Ibs/hr 4.3 4.9 3.2 6.4 9.4
Particulate Mass Flow Rate
Collected on Filter, Ibs/hr 2.7 1.0 1.1 4.8 6.0
-------
TABLE 2.7
SUMMARY OF RESULTS COMPARING 250°F AND 350°F
FILTER TEMPERATURES WITH REEVE ANGEL 934 AH
FILTERS - 9-21-79
00
00
o
>—»
I
(—*
o
VO
Filter Temperature:
Run No.:
Time Started:
Time Ended:
250°F
350°F
8
1017
1142
9
1455
1620
10
1850
2015
8
1040
1205
9
1500
1625
10
1930
2100
ro
Total Particulate Concen-
tration, gr/scf (dry)
Total Particulate Mass
Flow Rate, Ibs/hr
Particulate Mass Flow Rate
Collected on Filter, Ibs/hr 4.7
0.0462 0.0339 0.0246
15.3 11.1 8.1
2.2 2.2
0.0255 0.0142 0.0102
8.4 4.7 3.4
0.9 2.0 0.9
-------
#2688-01-1079 2-8
TABLE 2.7
SUMMARY OF S02 AND S03 RESULTS
Run Number: 8 9 10_
S02 Concentration, ppm 331 330 354
S03 Concentration, ppm 22 23 18
S02 Mass Flow Rate, Ibs/hr 128 126 135
S03 Mass Flow Rate, Ibs/hr 13.3 13.5 10.8
Scott Environmental Technology Inc.
-------
#2688-01-1079
2-9
TABLE 2.8
SUMMARY OF RESULTS OF OPACITY READINGS
Location: Precipitator Outlet
Test Run No.: 5
Date: 9-20-79
Color of Plume: White
Stack Height: 75 feet
Distance to Stack:. 100 feet
Wind Direction: SE Speed: 0-10 mph
Sky Description: Clear
Set
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Overall
Time
Start . End
0930 0936
0940 0946
0952 0958
1004 1010
1017 1023
1025 1032
1044 1050
1047 1103
1133 1139
Average:
. Opacity
Sum Average
240 10'
250 10
250 10
235 10
240 10
220 10
195 10
245 10
235 10
10
Set Time Opacity
Number Start End Sum Averaae
Scott Environmental Techndo«7V Inc
-------
#2688-01-1079
2-10
TABLE 2.9
SUMMARY OF RESULTS OF OPACITY READINGS
Location: Precipitator Outlet
Test Run No.: 6
Date: 9-20-79
Color of Plume: White
Stack Height: 75 feet
Distance to Stack: 100 feet
Wind Direction: SE Speed: 0-10 mph
Sky Description: Clear
Set Time
Number Start End
1 1500 1506
2 1508 1514
3 1518 1524
4 1532 1538
5 1547 1553
6 1604 1610
7 1621 1627
8 1638 1644
Overall Average:
. Opacity
Sum Average
250 10
245 10
235 10
215 10
190 10
220 10
190 10
185 10
10
Set Time Opacity
Number Start End Sum Averaae
-'", nr>!r
-------
#2688-01-1079
2-11
TABLE 2.10
SUMMARY OF RESULTS OF OPACITY READINGS
Location: Precipitator Outlet
Test Run No.: 8
Date: 9-21-79
Color of Plume: White
Stack Height: 75 feet
Distance to Stack: 100 feet
Wind Direction: SE, SW Speed: 0-5 mph
Sky Description: Clear
Set Time . Opacity
Number Start . End Sum Average
1 1050 1056 255 10
2 1058 1104 265 10
3 1112 1118 230 10
4 1121 1127 265 10
5 1134 1140 260 10
6 1148 ' 1154 260 10
7 1155 1201 335 15
8 1202 1208 270 10
Overall Average: 10
Set Time Opacity
Number Start End Sum Averaae
Scott Environment A! Terhnoto^v !r'
-------
#2688-01-1079
2-12
TABLE 2.11
SUMMARY OF RESULTS OF OPACITY READINGS
Location: Precipitator Outlet
Test Run No.: 9
Date: 9-21-79
Color of Plume: White
Stack Height: 75 feet
Distance to Stack:. 100 feet
Wind Direction: VariablSpeed: 0-5 mph
Sky Description: Clear
Set Time Opacity
Number Start
1 1500
2 1515
3 1531
4 1542
5 1554
6 1603
7 1613
8 1620
Overall Average
End Sum Average
1506 250 10
1521 235 10
1537 255 10
1548 255 10
1600 270 10
1609 270 10
1619 230 10
1626 260 10
: 10
Set Time Opacity
Number Start End Sum Averaae
f \ » '
-------
#2688-01-1079
3.0 PROCESS DESCRIPTION
The process evaluated is a glass-melting furnace which produces
quality flat glass by the soda-lime process for such uses as automobile
windshields and mirrors. • Ingredients including sand, limestone, soda ash,
cullet, and salt cake are continuously melted in a direct-fired furnace
burning #6 fuel oil at approximately 2800°F. A regenerative firing
system is used to conserve heat in the furnace. Each side of the furnace
has a chamber of a checkerwork of firebrick. Combustion air enters through
one of the chambers and after combustion with the fuel in the furnace, the
exhaust gases exit through the chamber on the opposite side of the furnace.
Heat conservation is achieved by reversing the flow of combustion air and
exhaust gases so that the incoming air is heated by the firebrick that has
been previously heated by exhaust gas.
The exhaust gases leaving the furnace pass through an electrostatic
precipitator for particulate removal before being released to the atmosphere.
The precipitator consists of three fields in series. Sampling was conducted
at the outlet of the precipitator. Figure 3.1 shows a schematic diagram of
the precipitator and the sampling location.
In an effort to lower particulate emissions, the quantity of salt
cake (sodium sulfate) added to the batch has recently been reduced at this
facility. Plant personnel have noted a significant decrease in the quantity
of particulate collected by the precipitator.
; Scott Environmental Technology Inc.
-------
To Atmosphere
10'
28'
O
FIGURE 3.1
ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR CONTROLLING
EMISSIONS FROM GLASS-MELTING FURNACE
GUARDIAN INDUSTRIES
KINGSBURG, CALIFORNIA 93631
=»=
ro
cr>
CO
CO
Outlet Sampling
Location
Electrostatic
Precipitator
Fan
CO
ro
Exhaust Gases
From Glass-Melting
Furnace
-------
#2688-01-1079
4.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
During Test Runs 1 through 4, participates were determined using a modi-
fied EPA Reference Method #5 at 350°F filter temperature. Sampling was conducted
at 32 points. This method involves the isokinetic extraction of a sample from the
gas stream and collection of the particulate on a heated out-of-stack filter. A
dry gas meter measures the volume of the gas sample. The gas velocity in the duct
is measured during the sampling with a Pi tot tube and inclined manometer. The
stack gas temperature is measured with a chrome!-alurnel thermocouple. The
quantity of particulate collected is determined gravimetrically with results
reports as grains of particulate per standard cubic foot of gas.
The method was modified in that the sample probe and collection
filter were heated to 350 F instead of the standard 250 F to avoid any
hydrolysis of sulfates. A Reeve Angel 934 AH filter was specifically used
because this filter is believed to be free from trace impurities which could
react with S0? in the sample to form particulate.
Test Runs #5, 6 and 7 consisted of particulate sampling by a modified
Method #5 with two trains run simultaneously at the same single point in the center
of the stack. One train used a Reeve Angel filter heated to 350 F and the other
train used a Gelman AE filter heated to 350°F. The purpose of these tests was
to compare the results obtained with the two different types of filters.
Test Runs #8, 9 and 10 also consisted of two modified Method #5 trains
run simultaneously at the center of the stack. For these tests, one train used
a Reeve Angel filter heated to 250°F and the other used a Reeve Angel filter
heated to 350°F in order to investigate the effect of filter temperature on
the particulate results. The train sampling with the 250°F filter was also
used to determine S0? and SO- concentrations by EPA Reference Method #8.
For this procedure, water in the impingers is replaced with isopropanol in
the first impinger, and hydrogen peroxide in the second and third impingers.
An unheated filter is placed between the first and second impingers to prevent
any carryover of SO-. The S0? and SO- collected in the impingers are then
determined by titration with barium perch!orate.
The opacity of the gases leaving the precipitator was recorded
during each test by a certified Smoke Reader.
! Scott Environmental Technology Inc.
-------
#2688-01-1079 A-l
APPENDIX A
PARTICIPATE, S02, AND S03 RESULTS
] Scott Environmental Technology Inc.
-------
#2688-01-1079
A-2
Modified Method 5 Results
32 Point Traverse Sample with Reeve Angel 934AH Filter
at 350°F
Location:
Run Number:
Date:
Time Started:
Time Ended:
Barometric Pressure:
Pbar (in' H9>
Static Pressure:
Pg (in. H20)
Pi tot Coefficient: C
Meter Calibration
Factor: Y
o
Area of Nozzle: An(in )
Total Sampling Time:
(Min)
Gas Sample Volume:
Vm (ft3)
Avg Velocity Head:
. , 9
(V Ap )" avg. (in.H20)
Avg. Orifice Pressure:
AH (in. H20)
Avg. Stack Temperature:
Ts (°R)
Avg. Meter Temperature:
Tm (OR)
Volume of Liquid and Silica
Gel Collected: Vlc (ml.)
Gas Sample Volume @ Std.
Cond. : , 17 ,-, ,, v
Vm(ctrM /ft3i _ 17.64 VmY
vmpia; \ri ) ^m
(Pbar+AH/13.6)
1
9-18-79
1105
1330
29.64
0.52
0.836
1.00
0.0491
96
57.570
0.52
1.0
1077
576
91
52.387
2
9-18-79
1715
1940
29.64
0.52
0.836
1.00
0.0491
96
58.345
0.53
1.08
1074
565
92
54.137
3
9-19-79
0845
1125
29.66
t
0.52
0.836
1.00
0.0491
96
55.925
0.52
1.05
1080
568
95
51.650
4
9-19-79
1520
1851
29.62
0.52
0.836
1.00
0.0491
96
57.016
0.52
1.05
1080
576
84
51.855
-------
#2688-01-1079
A-3
Location:
Run Number:
Volume of Water Vapor:
Vw(Std) (ft3) = 0.04707 .
Vlc
Moisture Content: B, =
Vw(Std) WS
VmfStd) + Vw(Std)
Molecular Wt. of Stack Gas
(dry): Hd =0.44 (%C02)
•»• 0.32 (% 02) + 0.28
(*N2 + % CO)
Molecular Wt. of Stack Gas
(wet): H + M. (1-B ) +
18.0 Bwcs ° WS
i/O1
Stack Pressure: P (in. Hgj
• Pbar + V13'6
Stack Gas Velocity: vs .(ft/sec
= 85.49 CD (APTs/PsPs)-s
Wt. of Particulate Collected:
mp (ing.) Nozzle, probe & filter
Cone, of Partic. @ Std Cond.
(dry):
C$(gr/scf)=0. 01542 mn/Vm (std)
Mass Flow Rate of Particulate:
Q (Ib/hr) = 0.008571 C5Qsd
Isokinetic Rate: I •{%) = 13.6
T5 Vm (std)/PsvsAn (1-BWS)
Control Efficiency, %
1
4.28
0.076
30.03
29.12
29.68
57.53
247.1*
0.0727*
24.0*
103.3
2
4.33
0.074
30.06
29.17
29.68
57.95
54.6
0.0156
. 5.22
105.4
3
4.47
0.080
30.06
29.10
29.70
57.61
47.8
0.0143
4.70.
102.3
4
3.95
0.071
30.28
29.41
29.66
57.35
77.4
0.0230
V
7.59
102.3
Results questionable - sample apparently contaminated by black substance.
-------
#2688-01-1079
A-4
MODIFIED METHOD 5 RESULTS
Comparison of Two Types of Glass Fiber Filters at 350 F
Both Trains Sampling Simultaneously at Center of Stack
Filter
Run Number:
Date:
Time Started:
Time Ended:
Barometric Pressure:
Pbar (in. Hg)
Static Pressure:
Pg (in. H20)
Pi tot Coefficient: C
Meter Calibration
Factor: Y
2
Area of Nozzle: A (in )
Total Sampling Time:
(Hin)
Gas Sample Volume:
. Vm (ft3)
Avg Velocity Head:
0 *
(V Ap T avg. (in.H20)
Avg. Orifice Pressure:
AH (in. H20)
Avg. Stack Temperature:
Ts (»R)
Avg. Meter Temperature:
Tm (OR)
Volume of Liquid and Silica
Gel Collected: Vlc (ml.)
Gas Sample Volume @ Std.
Cond. : ~ 17 /-/, .,_v
Vmfctfn /ft3% _ 17.64 VmY
viiHotaj \\\. ) - ym
(Pba/AH/13.6)
Reeve Angel 934 AH
5
0950
1130
29.52
0.52
0.836
1.00
0.0491
100
68.115
0.70 X
/0.52
1.4
1084
561
83
63.45
6
1510
1640
29.57
0.52
0.835
1.00
0.0491
87
63.172
0.72 X
x/ 0.52
1.3
1092
583
68
56.70
7
1930
2055
29.44
i
0.52
0.836
1.00
0.0491
85
65.040
0.71 X
/0.52
1.4
1082
569
82
59.57
Gelman AE
5
0925
1105
29.52
0.52
0.835
1.00
0.0491
100
67.831
0.73 X
/X 0.52
1.4
1088
552
98
64.21
6
1510
1537
29.57
0.52
0.836
1.00
0.0491
90
64.500
0.69 X
/X0.52
1.4
1086
591
83
57.13
7
1920
2045
29.44
0.52
0.835
1.00
0.0491
85
56.782
0.68 /'
X/0.52
1.3
1087
573
60
51.63
MJpper figure is average at sampling point. Lower figure is average in entire duct.
-------
#2688-01-1079
A-5
Filter
Run Number:
Volume of Water Vapor:
Vw(Std) (ft3) = 0.04707 .
Vlc
Moisture Content: B =
Vw(Std) WS
Vm(Std) + Vw(Std)
Molecular Wt. of Stack Gas
(dry): Md =0.44 (SSCOg)
+ 0.32 (% 02) + 0.28
(%H2 + % CO)
Molecular Wt. of Stack Gas
(wet): M + M (1-B ) +
18.0 B.
Stack Pressure: P (in. Hg)
• Ptar + V13'6
Stack Gas Velocity: vs .(ft/sec
= 85.49 C (APTS/P£PS)^*
Wt. of Particulate Collected:
mp (ing.) Nozzle, probe & filter
Cone, of Partic. @ Std Cond.
(dry):
Cc(gr/scf)=0. 01542 m /V (std)
C*(g/dscm)=0. 03529 mn/Vm (std)
^ n m
Mass Flow Rate of Particulate:
Q (Ib/hr) = 0.008571 CsQsd
Isokinetic Rate: I (%) = 13.6
Ts Vm (std)/PsvsAn (1-BWS)
Control Efficiency, %
Reeve Angel 934AH
5
3.91
0.058
30.17
29.46
29.56
^0
53.6
0.0130
4.3
102.8
6
3020
0.053
29.97
29.34
29.61
^
53.6
0,0146
4.9
103.6
7
3.86
0.061
30.34
29.59
29.48
67.07 ....
-"57740
37.2
0.0096
3,2
113.2
Gel man AE
5
4.61
0.067
30.17
29.35
29.56
57.64
**
139.9
**
0.0336
**
11.1
102.8
6
3.91
0.064
29.97
29.20
29.61
^
70.8
0.0191
6.4
103.6
7
2.82
0.052
30.34
29.70
29.48
" 57.36
94.3
0.0282
9.4
99.8
* Upper figure is average at sampling point. Lov/er figure is average in entire duct.
** Results questionable, sample apparently contaminated by black substance.
-------
#2688-01-1079
A-6
Filter
Run Number:
Wt. of Paniculate Collected
on filter only, (mg. )
Concentration of Parti cul ate
collected on Filter only @Std.
condition (dry)
(grains/scf)
Mass Flow Rate of Participate:
Collected on Filter, (Ib/hr.)
Reeve Angel 934AH
5
33.5
0.0081
2.7
6
11.4
0.0031
1.0
7
13.0
0.0034
1.1
Gelman AE
5
*•*
91.2
**
0.0219
7.2**
6
53.3
0.0144
4.8
7
59.8
0.0179
6.0
**
Results questionable, sample apparently contaminated by black substance.
-------
#2688-01-1079 A-7
Modified Method 5 Results
Comparison of Two Filter Temperatures Using Reeve Angel 934AH Filters
Both Trains Sampling Simultaneously at Center of Stack
Filter Temperature
Run Number:
Date:
Time Started:
Time Ended:
Barometric Pressure:
pbar (1n" Hg)
Static Pressure:
Pg (in. H20)
Pitot Coefficient: C
Meter Calibration
Factor: Y
Area of Nozzle: An(in )
Total Sampling Time:
(Min)
Gas Sample Volume:
Vm (ft3)
Avg Velocity Head:
0 *
(V AP T avg. (in.H20)
Avg. Orifice Pressure:
AH (in. H20)
Avg. Stack Temperature:
T, (»R)
Avg. Meter Temperature:
Tra (OR)
Volume of Liquid and Silica
Gel Collected: Vlc (ml.)
Gas Sample Volume @ Std.
Cond. : ~ , 7 c, ., v
vWtrn (ft3\ - 17<64 VmY
vmpta; (Ti ) - ,
(Pbar+AH/13.6)
250°F
8
9-21-79
1017
H42
29.57
0.52
0.835
1.00
0.0491
85
57.633
o.n/
X0.52
1.3
1091
558
73.8
54.05
9
9-21-79
1455
1620
29.46
0.52
0.835
1.00
0.0491
/
85
59.001
0.70X
X0.52
1.3
1095
587
79.2
52.40
10
9-21-79
1850
2015
29.46
0.52
0.835
1.00
0.0491
85
59.716
0.65/
X0.52
1.2
1094
577
84.3
53.94
350°F
8
9-21-79
1040
1205
29.57
0.52
0.836
1.00
0.0491 •
85
62.650
0.67/"
X0.52
1.3
1088
583
86
56.23
9
9-21-79
1500
1625
29.46
0.52
•-
0.836
1.00
0.0491
85
62.155
0.69/
X0.52
1.4
1091
588
85
55.12
10
9-21-79
1930
2100
29.46
0.52
0.836
1.00
0.0491
85
59.720
/
0.69/
X0.52
1.4'
1086
565
80
55.12
*Upper figure is average at sampling point. Lower f inure is 3"?raoe in
duel"
-------
#2688-01-1079
A-8
Filter Temperature
Run Number:
Volume of Water Vapor:
Vw(Std) (ft3) = 0.04707 .
Vlc
Moisture Content: B = .
Vw(Std) ws
Vm(Std) + Vw(Std)
Molecular Wt. of Stack Gas
(dry): Md = 0.44 (2!C02)
+ 0.32 (% 02) + 0.28
(%N2 + % CO)
Molecular Wt. of Stack Gas
(wet): M + M, (1-B ) +
18.0 Bwss d WS
Stack Pressure: P (in. Hg)
• Pbar * V13'6
Stack Gas Velocity: vs .(ft/sec
= 85.49 Cp (APTS/PSPS)'**
Wt. of Particulate Collected:
\ fag-) Nozzle, probe & filter
Cone, of Partic. § Std Cond.
(dry):
Cs(gr/scf)=0. 01542 mn/Vm (std)
Mass Flow Rate of Particulate:
Q (Ib/hr) = 0.008571 C$Qsd
Isokinetic Rate: I (%} = 13.6
Ts Vm (std)/P$vsAn (l-Bws)
Control Efficiency, %
250°F
8
3.47
0.060
30.24;
29.51:
29.6V
67. 21^
/S7.52
161.8
0.0462
15.3 :
102.8
9 f 10
•3.73
0.066
30.27
29.46
29.50
67.04-'
•"57^78
115.3
0.0339
n.i
101.3
3.97 •
0.069
30.20
29.36
29.50
64.68^--
•^57. 85
86.0
0.0246
. 8.1
108.3
350°F
8
4.05
0.067
30.24
29.42
29.61
65.38xx
X57-60
93.1
0.0255
8.4
110.5
9
4.00
0.068
30.27
29.44
29.50
66.54^
^7.76
50.8
0.0142
4.7.
107.2
10
3.77
0.064
30.20
29.42
29.50
66.4J.X
X57.65
36.6
0.0102
3.4
106.5
Upper figure is average at sampling point. Lov/er figure is average in entire duct.
-------
#2688-01-1079
A-9
Filter Temperature
Run Number:
Wt. of Particulate Collected
on Filter Only, (nig.)
Concentration of Particulate
Collected on Filter Only @Std.
Condition (dry) (Grains/scf)
Mass flow Rate of Particulate
Collected on Filter,(lb/hr.)
250°F
8
50.0
0.0143
4.7
9
22.3
0.0066
2.2
10
23.6
0.0067
2.2
350°F
8
9.5
0.0026
0.9
9 i 10
21.8
0.0061
2.0
10. 0
0.002.8
0.9
-------
#2688-01-1079 A-10
S02 AND S03 RESULTS
Run No.
Date:
Time Started:
Time Ended:
Gas Sample Volume @ Std. Cond:
Vm (std) (ft3)
Normality of barium perch! orate
titrant, N
Volume of titrant used for SO.,, V (ml)
Volume of titrant used for blank, V. (ml)
Total volume of sample solution, V , (ml)
Volume of sample aliquot titrated, V, (ml)
a
$03 concentration, CM cn (Ib/dscf as H9SO,,) =
A n2oU/J. d. "t
1.081xlO-4N(Vt-Vb)Vsoln/VaVm(std)
SO- concentration (ppm) =
«» N (vt-vb)vsoln/vavm std
Volume of titrant used for S0?, V. (ml)
Volume of titrant used for blank, V, (ml)
Total volume of sample solution, V , (ml)
Volume of sample aliquot titrated, V (ml)
a
S09 concentration, (Ln (Ib/dscf) - 7.061xl05
N
-------
#2688-01-1079 B-l
APPENDIX B
FIELD DATA SHEETS
S02
j^fi I
(\}' Scott EnvironmentalTechnologyInc.
-------
#2688-01-1079 C-l
APPENDIX C
OPACITY FIELD DATA SHEETS
Scott Environmental Techncfogy Inc.
------- |