AN AIR POLLUTION CONTROL
EQUIPMENT INVENTORY OF THE
AMERICAN STEEL INDUSTRY
Volume 1
D,raft Final Report
GCA
GCA CORPORATION
Technology Division
213 Burlington Road
Bedford, Mass. 01730
-------
GCA-TR-82-11-G
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Division of Stationary Source Enforcement
Washington, B.C.
Contract No. 68-01-6316
Technical Service Area 1
Work Assignment No. 28
EPA Project Officer
John R. Busik
EPA Task Director
Bernard Bloom
EPA Assignment Manager
Laxmi Kesari
AN AIR POLLUTION CONTROL
EQUIPMENT INVENTORY OF THE
AMERICAN STEEL INDUSTRY
Volume 1
Draft Final Report
February 1982
Prepared by:
Michael Jasinski
Peter Spawn
Sandra Beaton
Eugene Bergson
William Farino
GCA CORPORATION
GCA/TECHNOLOGY DIVISION
Bedford, Massachusetts
-------
DISCLAIMER
This Draft Final Report was furnished to the Environmental Protection
Agency by GCA Corporation, GCA/Technology Division, Burlington Road, Bedford,
Massachusetts 01730, in partial fulfillment of Contract No. 68-01-6136,
Technical Service Area 1, Work Assignment No. 28. The opinions, findings, and
conclusions expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of
the Environmental Protection Agency. Mention of company or product names is
not to be considered as an endorsement by the Environmental Protection Agency.
SPECIAL NOTE
The inventory reported in this document was initiated in October 1980
under EPA Contract No. 68-01-4143, Technical Service Area 1, Task No. 94.
Additional data compilation and investigation were performed in January 1981
under EPA Contract No. 68-01-6316, Technical Service Area 1, Task No. 6
(Phase II), and in March 1981 under EPA Contract No. 68-01-6316, Technical
Service Area 1, Work Assignment No. 6 (Amendment 1 - Phase III). Mr. Bernard
Bloom and Mr. Laxmi Kesari served as EPA Task Directors/Assignment Managers
for this program.
All material presented in this document is subject to a confidentiality
review, and is not releasable as of February 1, 1982. For further
information, contact Mr. Laxmi Kesari, United States Environmental Protection
Agency, Division of Stationary Source Enforcement, Washington, D.C.
ii
-------
CONTENTS
Tables ill
Abstract . iv
TABLES
(Volume 1)
Numbers
1-40 Coke Oven Charging (Furnace Coke Producers) 1
1-18 Coke Oven Charging (Foundry Coke Producers) 60
References 80
1-40 Coke Oven Pushing (Furnace Coke Producers) 90
1-18 Coke Oven Pushing (Foundry Coke Producers) 148
References 168
1-40 Coke Oven Quenching (Furnace Coke Producers) 179
1-18 Coke Oven Quenching (Foundry Coke Producers) 235
References . 255
1-40 Coke Oven Combustion Stacks (Furnace Coke Producers) • • • 264
1-18 Coke Oven Combustion Stacks (Foundry Coke Producers) . . . 325
References 344
ill
-------
ABSTRACT
At the request of the Division of Stationary Source Enforcement, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, GCA/Technology Division compiled an inventory
of process and emissions control equipment installed within the American steel
industry. Every effort was made to collect the most accurate data possible,
using technical literature, EPA and EPA-contractor reports, and discussions
with local, state, and federal regulatory agencies. Each data point is
referenced so its origin and reliability can be assessed.
Specifically, the inventory, contained within two volumes, represents
information for the following categories:
(1) Coke Plants (Furnace and Foundry Coke Producers)
• charging
• pushing
• quenching
• combustion stacks
• coke oven gas desulfurization
(2) Sintering Machines
(3) Blast Furnaces
(4) External Iron Desulfurization Stations
(5) Steelmaking Shops
• basic oxygen converters
• electric arc furnaces
• open hearth furnaces
(6) Scarfing Machines (automatic)
IV
-------
MATERIAL ,IN THIS SECTION SUBJECT TO CONFIDENTIALITY
REVIEW AND IS NOT RELEASABLE AS OF FEBRUARY 1, 1982.
FOR INFORMATION, CONTACT L. KESARI, U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY, DIVISION OF STATIONARY SOURCE ENFORCEMENT.
n
go
- ^
> H
n 2
M
o
o pu
O P]
o
H
a
o
-------
TABLE 1. ARMCO INC./HAMILTON WORKS IN HAMILTON, OH
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
No. I1
No. 21 No. 31
No. 41
Koppers-Becker (all four batteries)2
1927a>3 19381 19411 19471
1976b>2 I97?b>2 1978b>2
451 15l 251
3(each, all four batteries)-*-
l(each, all four batteries)-*-
12-5(each, all four batteries)1
43-01 43-01 40-81
40-81
1,930 (all four batteries combined)6
1,811 (all four batteries combined)6
Larry car (all four batteries)-*-
Screw feed (all four batteries)^
Manual (all four batteries)^>-*
Simultaneous (all four batteries)^
Manual (all four batteries)^
1,3,2 (cokeside, pushside, center-all four
batteries)^
Sequential Charging;^ Stage Charging0>5
(all four batteries)
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery rebuilt 1961.1
^Involved end-flue rehabilitation.2
cLarry car equipped with jumper pipe located on push side.
-------
TABLE 2. ARMCO INC./HOUSTON WORKS IN HOUSTON, TX
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:3
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
No. I1
Koppers-Becker2
19432
19762
471
37
18
13-131
40-1I1
No. 21
Koppers-Becker2
19531
19772
151
37
18
13-131
40-111
1,045 (both batteries combined)^
840 (both batteries combined)^
Larry car1
Turntable7
Manual7
Larry
Turntable7
Manual7
Stage charging**'
Stage charging^
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2
"Larry cars equipped with jumper pipe located on push side.7
-------
TABLE 3. ARMCO INC./MIDDLETOWN WORKS IN MIDDLETOWN, OH
COKE PLANT NO. 2
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
No. I1
Wilputte1'9
19532,10
761
34,9
28,9
13-61
43-9!
5,150 (Coke Plants No. 2 and 3 combined)6
4,890 (Coke Plants No. 2 and 3 combined)6
Larry
Screw feed; H turntable9
Automatic
11
Independent^
Manual^
No. 3, No. 1, No. 29
Stage charging^
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
-------
TABLE 4. ARMCO INC./MIDDLETOWN WORKS IN MIDDLETOWN, OH
COKE PLANT NO. 3
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:3
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
No.
Dravo-Still1'12
19761
49.12
28,9
19-81
52-61
See previous page"
Larry car*
Screw feedH'l2
Automat ic^.H
Simultaneous-*
Manual-*
1 and 4, 2 then 312
No. 21'12
Dravo-Stilll'12
19771
49,12
28,9
19-81
52-61
Larry carl
Screw feedll>12
Automatic9jH
Simultaneous^
Manual-*
1 and 4, 2 then 312
Both Larry cars are equipped for both
sequential or stage charging'."
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aStainless steel construction of hoppers, drop sleeves and screw feeders.
-------
TABLE 5. BETHLEHEM STEEL CORP./BETHLEHEM PLANT IN BETHLEHEM, PA
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
2A2
2B2
3A2
3B2
Koppers-Becker (all four batteries)^
19412 19412 j.9422 19422
102b>1»16
4 (each, all four batteries)!**
1 (each, all four batteries)16
3 (each, all four batteries)2
5,840 (all six batteries combined)6
5,058 (all six batteries combined)6
Larry car (all four batteries)16
Gravity feed (all four batteries)16
Manual (all four batteries)16
Manual (all four batteries)16
Stage charging (all four batteries)1^
(continued)
-------
TABLE 5 (continued)
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
52,14
Koppers-Becker2
1953a>2
802,12
516
12,17
42,12
See previous
9
Larry car^-
Gravity feedl6
Manual16
A2
McKee-Otto2
19762
802
416
22,17
62
page6
9
Larry car^
Gravity feedi6
Automatic^6
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
Manual
16
ManualI6
Stage charging^ Stage charging!7
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery 5 rebuilt in 1977.15
bBatteries 2A and 2B combined.
cBatteries 3A and 3B combined.
-------
TABLE 6. BETHLEHEM STEEL CORP./BURNS HARBOR PLANT IN CHESTERTON, IN
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in. ):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
No. I1
Wilputte1
19698,18
1980a» 19
1982b>19
821
418
l8, 18
20-5"
50-718
No. 21
Koppers1
19728»18
19728>18
821
418
28
20-518
50-7 18
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
6,670 (both batteries combined)**
5,179 (both batteries combined)^
Larry car1
Screw feed18
Automatic18
Simultaneous18
Mechanical19
1-4-2-318
Larry car1
Screw feed18
Automatic18
Simultaneous18
Mechanical19
1-4-2-318
Stage charging0>19 Stage charging19
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
alnvolved changing steam nozzles, i.e., increasing aspiration, and rebuilding
battery top.19
"Scheduled shutdown for rebuild, i.e., double collector mains to be
installed.19
°Larry car equipped with jumper pipe located on push side.
18
-------
TABLE 7. BETHLEHEM STEEL CORP./JOHNSTOWN PLANT IN JOHNSTOWN, PA
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:a>b
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
COKE PRODUCTION:0
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
No. 1811
Koppers20
195120,21
198220,22
7720,21
323
12,20
3.5;2* 42
3,500 (for three battery operation)**
3,028 (for three battery operation)^
Larry car2
Gravity feed20
Manual20
Simultaneous20
Stage charging** > 23
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery No. 18 located in designated area known as the Franklin Plant.
Battery Nos. 17 and 19 (total—151 ovens) also in the Franklin Plant, were
shut down in 1977 due to a flood.20
"Johnstown facility also contained battery Nos. 15 and 16 (total—88 ovens),
designated as the Rosedale Plant, which were shut down in 1977 due to a
flood.20
cProduction data shown for the Franklin Plant prior to the shutdown of
Battery Nos. 17 and 19.6
"Larry car equipped with jumper pipe located on coke side.20>23
-------
TABLE 8. BETHLEHEM STEEL CORP./LACKAWANNA PLANT IN LACKAWANNA, NY
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
No. 7 2
Wilputte2
19522
762,26.
325
125,26
12-226
40-726
No. 82
Wilputte2
19612
1980b>25
762,26
325
125,26
12-226
40-726
No. 92
Wilputte2
19692
1982c,25
762,26
325
!25,26
20-426
48-326
COKE PRODUCTION:d
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
8,140 (for seven battery operation)6
6,908 (for seven battery operation)6
Larry car^ Larry car^ Larry care»
Manual26
Manual26
Manual26
Manual26
Automatic26
Manual26
Stage charging (all three batteries)^>2->>26
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery Nos. 3, 4, 5 and 6 were shut down in 1977.26
^Battery was completely rebuilt.2^
cScheduled shutdown for rebuild.2^
"Production data appears to be prior to 1977 battery shutdowns.6
eSpare larry car equipped with a scrubber (installed in 1970) also
available. -*
*Larry cars equipped with jumper pipes located on push side.2-'
-------
TABLE 9. BETHLEHEM STEEL CORP./SPARROWS POINT PLANT IN SPARROWS POINT, MD
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
No. I2 No. 22
No. 32
No. 42
19782
1985b>27
632
Koppers (all four batteries)2
I9602 19612 19512
1985b,27 I985b>27 1982C>27
632 602 632
4(each, all four batteries)2"
l(each, all four batteries)2>27
3(each, all four batteries)2
43-0(each, all four batteries)1
5,500 (all eight batteries combined)27
Larry car (all four batteries)2
Gravity feed (all four batteries)27
Manual (all four batteries)27
Stage charging (all four batteries)***27
(continued)
10
-------
TABLE 9 (continued)
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:8
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
OVEN LENGTH (ft~in.):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
No. 52 No. 62 No. II2 No. 122
Koppers2 Koppers2 Koppers- Koppers-
Becker2 Becker2
19782 19532 19552 19572
1985b,27 1982C»27
632 632 652 652
4(each, all four batteries)28
!2,27 !2,27 22.27 i27,28
32 32 42 42
43-0(each, all four batteries)1
See previous page2'
Larry car (all four batteries)2
Gravity feed (all four batteries)27
Manual (all four batteries)27
Stage charging (all four batteries)^*27
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery Nos. 9 and 10 were shut down in early 1981.27
%ew Battery A to startup in Dec. 1981; new Battery B scheduled to startup
in Dec. 1985 will replace Battery Nos. 1, 2, 4, and 5.27
cPlant has the option to either shut down Battery Nos. 3 and 6 in 1982, or
continue their operation until 1985.27
^Larry car equipped with jumper pipe located on coke side for all batteries,
except No. II.28
11
-------
TABLE 10. CF&I STEEL CORP./PUEBLO PLANT IN PUEBLO, CO
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in. ):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
Bl
Koppers2
197229
65l
42
28
13-030
43-230
ci
Koppers2
19742,29
. , 471
430
28
13-030
43-230
Dl
Koppers-Beckefl
19608
1974a»2
311
430
2a,29
13-030
43-230
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL
SYSTEM:
Larry car (all three batteries)^
Screw feed (all three batteries)29
Automatic (all three batteries)29
Simultaneous (all three batteries)29
Automatic (all three batteries)29
2-3, then 1-4, and 2-3 (all three batteries)29
Sequential - stage charging (all three
batteries29
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation, and converting from single to double
9 9Q -«-»«-•
collector mains.*•>*•*
12
-------
TABLE 11. FORD MOTOR CO./RIVER ROUGE PLANT IN DEARBORN, MI
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:8
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
Koppers-Becker2>31
Wilputte2,31
1972L32
1979C»2
45!
332
2l»32
13-31
40-41
131
332
2L32
13-31
40-41
4,340 (all five batteries combined)6
3,945 (all five batteries combined)6
Larry carl
Screw feed32
Manual32
Independent32
Manual32
Larry carl
Screw feed32
Manual32
Independent32
Manual32
cokeside, pushside, cokeside, pushside,
then center32 then center32
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM: Modified stage charging (both batteries)32
(continued)
13
-------
Koppers-Becker (all three batteries)2.31
1937d,l 19396'1 19631
1979C»2 1977C»2
6ll
332
21.32
13-31
40-41
61 1
332
2l>32
13-31
40-41
251
332
21.32
13-31
40-41
TABLE 11 (continued)
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:41
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:'
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
See previous page^
Larry car (all three batteries)!
Screw feed (all three batteries)32
Manual (all three batteries)32
Independent (all three batteries)32
Manual (all three batteries)32
cokeside, pushside, then center (all three
batteries)32
Modified stage charging
(all three batteries)3-*
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery D pushed empty in 1972.32
^Battery rebuilt in 1964; 16 ovens have been hot and empty since 1964.1>32
clnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2
dBattery rebuilt in 1962.1
eBattery rebuilt in 1963.1
14
-------
TABLE 12. INLAND STEEL CO./INDIANA HARBOR WORKS IN E. CHICAGO, IN
COKE PLANT NO. 2
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
No. 61
No. 71
No. 81
Koppers-Becker (all three batteries)^
19501 !956l
19743,2
651
433
134
12-01
37-71
871
433
l3*
12-Ql
37-71
871
433
!34
12-Ql
37-71
6,170 (all five batteries combined)6
5,640 (all five batteries combined)6
Larry car (all three batteries)!
Gravity feed (all three batteries)33
Manual (all three batteries)33
Independent and simultaneous
(all three batteries)33
Automatic (all three batteries)3^
1,4,3,2 (all three batteries)33
Sequential charging
(all three batteries)'',33
(continued)
15
-------
TABLE 12 (continued)
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
No. 91
Koppers-Becker (both batteries)2
19591
871
433 '
No. 101
battei
19701
433
12 -Ql
37-71
See previous page*>
Larry car*
Gravity feed33
Manual33
20-01
37-41
Larry carc»l
Screw feed34
Automatic34
Independent and simultaneous
(both batteries)33*34
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
Automatic34
1,4, 3, 233
Sequential
charging^3 »33
Automatic34
1,4,3,
Stage
chargi
233,34
ngl9,35
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.^
^Larry car equipped with jumper pipe located on coke side.
cLarry car equipped with scrubber controls used between 1970-1979.19,35
16
-------
TABLE 13. INLAND STEEL CO./INDIANA HARBOR WORKS IN E. CHICAGO, IN
COKE PLANTS NO. 3a AND 4b
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
Koppers^
19741,36
1979c,36
28,36
20-21
47-111
2,5006
1.5626
Pipeline-*-
Venturi scrubber37
Air Pol37
197415,38
• 21,000-77,370 acfm (design range)37
• Design temperature = 550°F
• One I.D. fan required37
• Adjustable throat can vary Ap from
10-55 in. W.G.37
• Test Data (1977):37
27,223 acfm at 183°F (North stack)
(continued)
17
-------
TABLE 13 (continued)
COKE PLANTS NO. 3a AND 4b
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
111
Koppers^
19781,36
691,36
28,36
20-01
47-111
3.0146
2.7406
Pipeline1
Venturi scrubber39 ,40
Air Pol39
• Two preheater units, each controlled
by individual scrubber39'4"
• Test Data (1981);41
21,000 acfm at 180°F (No. 1 preheater
scrubber unit)
• Test Data (1979) ;40
42,000 acfm from each scrubber exhaust
stack
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery No. C1
bBattery No. II1
clnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.36
18
-------
TABLE 14. INTERLAKE INC./RIVERDALE PLANT IN CHICAGO, IL
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in. ):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
No. I15
Wilputte1
1956;1 19578
1979a,2
502,8
342
l8,43
12-81
40-8 l
No. 215
Wilputte1
19571
1979a>2
502,8
342
l8,43
12-81
40-81
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
1 1,740 (both batteries combined)6'44
1,460 (both batteries combined)6
Larry car1
Gravity feed43'44
Automatic4-'
Larry car1
Gravity feed43.44
Automatic4-*
Stage chargingb»42»45 Stage chargingb>42»45
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2'42
^Larry cars equipped with jumper pipe located on coke side.44
19
-------
TABLE 15. JONES & LAUGHLIN STEEL CORP./ALIQUIPPA WORKS IN ALIQUIPPA, PA
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:8
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
COKE PRODUCTION:4
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
Koppers-Becker^
19451
197848
1061
347
18,47
13-01
40-51
4,308 (both batteries combined)46
3,500 (both batteries combined)*7
Larry car^-
Gravity feed*6
Manual47
Independent and simultaneous47
Manual47
3, then 1, then 247
Sequential charging^*47
(continued)
20
-------
TABLE 15 (continued)
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:*
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-ln.):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-ln.):
COKE PRODUCTION:d
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
A-515.1
Koppers
19762»8
561
417
2c,47
20-61
50-71
See previous
Pipeline - Coaltek System38
Wet Scrubbers^8
AAF*9
197615,38
• Preheaters designed to heat 100 tons of coal/hr to 500°F^9
• Coal preheating via two identical, parallel, independent systems (Nos- 1
and 2)49
• Ap (scrubber throat) «= 21 in. W.G. (normal)^9
• I.D. fan rated at 40,000 acfra.49
(continued)
21
-------
TABLE 15 (continued)
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
Test Data (1978)!48
Inlet - 303 dry, std., Nm3/m
Outlet - 247-312 dry, std., Nm3/m
Test Data (1977);49
Preheater stack No. 1—10,500 dsfm; T = 176°F (avg.)
Preheater stack No. 2—7,600 dsfm; T = 193°F (avg.)
Test Data (1976);50
Inlet (range) - 39,212-43,100 acfm @ 487-501°F
Outlet (range) = 23,389-42,070 acfm @ 180-186°F
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS
aBatteries A-3 and A-4 were shut down In 1980.46,47
bBattery A-5 replaced Battery A-2 in 1975-1976.47
cBoth collector mains on coke side.4'
"^Production data for a four battery operation (A-l, A-3, A-4, and A-5)
6,946 (rated tons/day), 4,506 (typical tons/day).6
eLarry car equipped with jumper pipe located on coke side.47
22
-------
TABLE 16. JONES & LAUGHLIN STEEL CORP./CAMPBELL WORKS IN CAMPBELL, OH
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in. ):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
No. 71
Wilputte1
19548
761
351
28
13-01
43-0 L
No. 91
Wilputte1
19588
761
351
28
13-01
43-01
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
4,000;1 3,816
(for a three battery operation)"
3,483 (for a three battery operation)"
Larry car1
Turntable52
Manual52
Manual51
1 and 3, then 251
Stage charging51
Larry car1
Turntable52
Manual52
Manual51
1 and 3, then 251
Stage charging51
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery No. 8 was shut down on June 5, 1981.
23
-------
TABLE 17. JONES & LAUGHLIN STEEL CORP./INDIANA HARBOR WORKS
IN E. CHICAGO, IN
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION :a
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE: .
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in. ):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
No. 41
Koppers-Becker^
19562,54
1976b»53
751
353,54
l8,54
13-OL54
40-&54
No. 91
Koppers-Becker^
19611.53
1979b,2
8?1
353,54
l8,54
13-OL54
40-654
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
4.050;1 4,000
(for a three battery operation)"
3,406 (for a three battery operation)"
Larry car1
Gravity feed53
Siraultaneous53
Larry car1
Gravity feed53
Simultaneous53
1, 2 and 454 1, 2 and 454
Stage charging0»55 Stage charging0»55
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery No. 3 is permanently shut down.53
^Involved end-flue rehabilitation.2
cLarry car equipped with jumper pipe located on No. 3 port.54
24
-------
TABLE 18. JONES & LAUGHLIN STEEL CORP./PITTSBURGH WORKS
IN PITTSBURGH, PA
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.)'
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
Pll
Wilputte1
19601
ATE: 197956
591
356
18,57
13 -Ql
40-91
P21
Wilputte1
19611
1977a>2
591
356
18,57
13-01
40-91
P3N1
Wilputte1
19611
1980a>56
591
356
18,57
13-01
40-91
5,300 (all five batteries combined)6
5,230 (all five batteries combined)6
Larry car (all three batteries)1
Gravity feed (all three batteries56
Manual (all three batteries)57
Independent (all three batteries)5?
Manual (all three batteries)5'
Stage charging (all three batteries)56
(continued)
25
-------
TABLE 18 (continued)
COKE OWN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
DATE:
rE:
3:
pa^1 fis
Wilputte1
19611
1978a>2
591
356
18,57
13-01
40-91
P41
Koppers-Becker2
19531
I977a»2
791
356
18,57
13-01
40-61
See previous page6
Larry car56
Gravity feed56
Manual5'
Independent5'
Manual5'
Larry car56
Gravity feed56
Manual57
Independent57
Manual57
Stage charging56 Stage charging56
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.
26
-------
TABLE 19. KAISER STEEL CORP. IN FONTANA, CA
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
Koppers-Becker^
194258
197358
B1
Koppers-Becker^
194258
197358
45!
358
28
13-058
40-558
451
358
28
13-058
40-558
4.250;1 4,100
(all seven batteries combined)"
3,800 (all seven batteries combined)6
Larry
Gravity feed58
Mechanical58
Simultaneous58
Larry
Gravity feed58
Mechanical-*"
Simultaneous58
No. 1, 3, 258 No. 1, 3, 258
Stage charging58 Stage charging58
(continued)
27
-------
TABLE 19 (continued)
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
Koppers-Becker^
194958
1976b«58
451
358
2«
13-058
40-5^8
Koppers-Becker^
195258
1979-801'58
451
352
28
13-058
40-558
See previous page-"-'"
Larry
Gravity feed58
Mechanical-*"
Siraultaneous58
Larry car-'-
Gravity feed58
Mechanical58
Simultaneous58
No. 1, 3, 258 No. 1, 3, 258
Stage charging58 Stage charging58
(continued)
28
-------
TABLE 19 (continued)
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in. ):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-ln. ):
El
Koppers-
Becker^
195258
1978b»2
45l
358
28
13-058
40-558
Fl
Koppers-
Becker2
195858
45l
358
28
13-058
40-5 58
Gl
Koppers-
Becker2
195858
451
358
28
13-058
40-558
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
See previous
Larry car (all three batteries)^
Gravity
feed58
Turntable58 Turntable58
Mechanical (all three batteries)58
Simultaneous (all three batteries)58
No. 1,3,2 (all three batteries)58
Stage charging (all three batteries)58
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
alnvolved trimwork.58
^Involved end-flue rehabilitation.58
29
-------
TABLE 20. LONE STAR STEEL CO. IN LONE STAR, TX
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
COKE PRODUCTION:15
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
Koppers^
197915
7024
47,60
27,61
527,24
1,2146
6906
Larry car
60
Gravity feed?
Automatic? »^2
Independent^
1-4-2-360
Stage charging?
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBatteries A and B (total—78 ovens) were shut down in 1979.?
"Production data appears to be for the old batteries.^>?
30
-------
TABLE 21. NATIONAL STEEL CORP./GREAT LAKES STEEL DIV. IN ECORSE, MI
COKE PLANT NO. 2
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
No. 31
Wilputte1
19542,64
1982b>5
70r
364
25,64
13-21
40-81
No. 41
Wilputte1
19562>64
1974a,63
781'63
363
25,64
13-2 l
40-81
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
2,500 (both batteries combined)6
2,500 (both batteries combined)6
Larry car
Larry car1
Turntable63
Simultaneous63
Stage charging1 Stage charging1
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.63
"Scheduled shutdown for rebuild, and eventual startup in 1985.-
31
-------
TABLE 22. NATIONAL STEEL CORP./GREAT LAKES STEEL DIV. IN ECORSE, MI
COKE PLANT NO. 3
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
No. 51
Otto64
19701'64
851'64
464,65
ia,2,64
20-5l
40-6; 50-764
3.412:64 2.9006
2,700°
Larry
Automatic"-'
Automatic6-*
Stage charging*1 »64
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aScheduled upgrading in future will involve the addition of second
collector main.64
^Larry car equipped with jumper pipe located on coke side.64
32
-------
TABLE 23. NATIONAL STEEL CORP./GRANITE CITY STEEL DIVISION IN GRANITE CITY, IL
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
66
McKee-Otto
198066»67
4566
466
266,67
14-Q66
40-666
760-85366
Larry car66
Screw feed66,67
Automatic5 »66
Independent5
1 and 4, 2 then 366
Stage charging66
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aPlant formerly operated Batteries B and C which contained 49 and 61
ovens, respectively. These batteries are currently being rebuilt (similar to
Battery A), and will contain 45 and 47 ovens, respectively.66
"This battery replaced a similar type Koppers-Becker battery containing 27
ovens.67
33
-------
TABLE 24. NATIONAL STEEL CORP./WEIRTON STEEL DIV. IN WEIRTON, WV
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
M-7l
M-81
4,500 (Mainland, four
battery operation)^>6
4,066 (Mainland, four
battery operation)^ »6
Larry car-'- Larry car^-
Gravity
feed68
1 and
4,2,369
1 and
4,2,369
I-ll
Koppers-
Becker2
19511
198269
61 1
469
12
13-21
40-91
Koppers-
Becker2
195368
1977b>68
4ll
469
!&8
13-21
40-6&8
Koppers-
Becker2
197368
1979C»2
87l
469
2&8.70
20-468
47-368
3.6006
3,0006
Larry car^-
Screw
Automatic68 Automatic68
Automatic68 Automatic68
1 and
4,2,369
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM: Stage charging (all three batteries)e>1>68
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBatteries M-5 and M-6 (total of 106 ovens) were shut down in Sept.-Oct.
1980.69
^Involved end-flue rehabilitation.68
cInvolved end-wall repairs.2
^Production data for the "mainland" reflects a four battery operation
(M-5, M-6, M-7, and M-8).6
eLarry car on Battery M-8 is equipped with jumper pipe located on coke
side.68
34
-------
TABLE 25. REPUBLIC STEEL CORP./SOUTHERN STEEL DISTRICT, THOMAS WORKS
IN BIRMINGHAM, AL
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
No. I1
Koppers*
194ia,l
198lb,72
473
12,73
13-01
40-0 X
1,066;6 9501
5606
Larry
Air pressure72
Manual73
1-3-2, then 472
Stage charging0*'3
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery was rebuilt in 1969.2
"Involved end-flue rehabilitation.72
cLarry cars equipped with jumper pipe located on coke side.73
35
-------
TABLE 26. REPUBLIC STEEL CORP./CHICAGO DISTRICT IN CHICAGO, IL
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
\
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
No. I1
Wilputte1'74
19431'74
X98ia.24.66
75L74
474
iS.66
13-01
42-766
1.369:6 1.2001
1,300°
Larry
Manual45* 66
Stage chargingb>66
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery No. 1 to be replaced by a Battery No. 2 with 60 ovens, 6 m high,
double collector mains, 4 charge holes, automatic lid lifters, using stage
charging and rated at 1,800 tons of coke per day.66
"Larry car equipped with a jumper pipe located on No. 3 charge port.66
36
-------
TABLE 27. REPUBLIC STEEL CORP./CLEVELAND DISTRICT IN CLEVELAND, OH
COKE PLANT NO. 1
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:8
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:b
No. I1 No. 21 No. 31
Koppers (all four batteries)1
197615 19582 19582
19722 19722
No. 41
19582
19722
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-In.):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
51 (each, all four batteries)1
3 (each, all four batteries)7^
2 (each, all four batteries)7^
13-2 (each, all four batteries)1
41-0 (each, all four batteries)1
2,782 (all four batteries combined)6
2,049 (all four batteries combined)6
Larry car (all four batteries)1
Screw feed (all four batteries)76
Automatic (all four batteries)76
Independent (all four batteries)76
Manual (all four batteries)7-*
No. 1, then No. 3, then No. 2
(all four batteries)76
Stage charging (all four batteries)7-*
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery No. 5 was shut down in 1975.76
^Included end-flue rehabilitation.2
37
-------
TABLE 28. REPUBLIC STEEL CORP./CLEVELAND DISTRICT IN CLEVELAND, OH
COKE PLANT NO. 2
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:b
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
No. 61
Koppers-Becker^
19522
19792
No. 71
Koppers-Becker*
19528
19792
63l
375
28,75
13-21
41-01
631
375
28,75
13-21
41-01
1,954 (both batteries combined)6
1,286 (both batteries combined)6
Larry
Gravity feed76
Automatic'6
Independent76
Manual75
Larry
Gravity feed76
Automatic76
Independent76
Manual75
No. 1, then No. 3, then No. 2
(both batteries)76
Stage charging75 Stage charging75
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery No. 5 was shut down in 1975.76
"Included end-flue rehabilitation.2
38
-------
TABLE 29. REPUBLIC STEEL CORP./SOUTHERN DISTRICT, GULFSTEEL WORKS
IN GADSDEN, AL
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
No. 21
Wilputte2
194277
1973a'2
65L77
478
l8,77
42,77
37-01
No. 31
Wilputte2
I960;77 19652>8
65L77
478
18,77
42«77
37-01
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM;
2,372;6 1.4001
(both batteries combined)
1,785 (both batteries combined)6
Larry car1 Larry
Gravity feed77 Gravity feed77
i77 Manual77
Manual'
Manual78
Manual78
Stage charging78 Stage charging78
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2
"Larry cars are equipped with a jumper pipe located on coke side.77
39
-------
TABLE 30. REPUBLIC STEEL CORP./CENTRAL ALLOY DISTRICT IN MASSILLON, OH
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
No. I1
Koppers^
19551
198222
379
18
13-21
41-01
576-6 5001
500°
Larry car*-
Gravity feed80
Manual80
Independent"0
No. 1, then No. 3,
then No. 280
Sequential charging''
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
40
-------
TABLE 31. REPUBLIC STEEL CORP./MAHONING VALLEY DISTRICT IN WARREN, OH
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATIONS
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
No. 481
1979
852,52
351 -
24,82
482
41-1151
1.8526
1.2796
Larry
Screw
Automatical
Independent^!
Mechanical^
Stage charging^*-
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBatteries No. 1 and 2 were shut down in March 1979.^2
41
-------
TABLE 32. REPUBLIC STEEL CORP./MAHONING VALLEY DISTRICT IN YOUNGSTOWN, OH
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
Al
Koppersl
X95Q1.83
1982b,15
381
351
12,51
13-21
41-01
Bl
Koppersl
!9501,83
1982b,15
651
351
12,51
13-21
41-01
ci
Kopperel
1950s »1
591
351
1;2 251
13-21
41-Ql
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
2.970;1 2,6406
(all three batteries combined)
2,735 (all three batteries combined)6
Larry car (all three batteries)!
Gravity feed (all three batteries)8/*
Manual (all three batteries)8^
Simultaneous (all three batteries)8^
Manual (all three batteries)51
Nos. 1 and 3, then No. 2
(all three batteries)5!
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM: Stage charging (all three batteries)1.5i
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery rebuilt in 1962.2
^Scheduled shutdown by Federal Consent Decree.15
42
-------
TABLE 33. UNITED STATES STEEL CORP./CLAIRTON WORKS IN CLAIRTON, PA
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
No. 185
Wilputte85
195585
197985
6485
485
286
13-085
37-085
No. 285
Wilputte85
195585
197985
6485
485
286
13-085
37-085
No. ^85
Wilputte85
195585
197985
6485
485
286
13-085
37-085
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
20,780 (entire coke plant)6
16,342 (entire coke plant)6
Larry car (all three batteries)86
Gravity feed (all three batteries)85
Manual (all three batteries)85
Simultaneous (all three batteries)86
Mechanical (all three batteries)56
Nos. 4 and 1, then No. 3, then No. 2
(all three batteries)85
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM: Stage charging (all three batteries)85
(continued)
43
-------
TABLE 33 (continued)
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
No. 785
Koppers85
195437
198422
6487
456
286
42
No. 885
Koppers"
195488
19 8422
6488
456
286
42
No. 985
Koppers85
195489
198422
6489
456
286
42
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
See previous page"
Larry car (all three batteries)8"
Gravity feed (all three batteries)85
Manual (all three batteries)85
Simultaneous (all three batteries8"
Mechanical (all three batteries)5**
Nos. 4 and 1, then 3, then 2
(all three batteries)85
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM: Stage charging (all three batteries)85
(continued)
44
-------
TABLE 33 (continued)
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:!
No. 1585
Koppers'O
19533,90
6185,90
456
286
42
See previous pages**
Larry car°"
Gravity feed**5
Automatic*^
Simultaneous""
Mechanical-^
Nos. 1-4-3-256
Stage charging8^
(continued)
45
-------
TABLE 33 (continued)
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in. ):
No. 1685
Wilputte91
195091
198222
6135,91
485
286
42
No. 17 85
Wilputte92
195092
198222
61*5
485
286
492
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
See previous pages"
Larry
Gravity feed85
Manual85
Simultaneous8^
Mechanical5^
Nos. 1-4-3-256
Stage charging85
86
Larry car
Gravity feed85
Manual85
Simultaneous8^
Mechanical5**
Nos. 1-4-3-256
Stage charging85
(continued)
46
-------
TABLE 33 (continued)
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
No. 1985 No. 2085 No. 2185 No. 2285
Koppers-Becker (all four batteries)85
1951" 1947b»94 194795 194696
197785 1972C>85 1973d>85
87 (each, all four batteries)85
4 (each, all four batteries)85
2 (each, all four batteries)86
52 52,94 52 596
See previous pages"
Larry car (all four batteries)86
Gravity feed (all four batteries)85
Manual (all four batteries)85
Simultaneous (all four batteries)86
Mechanical (all four batteries56
Nos. 1-4-3-2 (all four batteries)56
Stage charging (all four batteries)85
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery No. 15 was rebuilt in 1979.2
bBattery No. 20 was rebuilt in 1978.85
clnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.85
^Involved bench-up rehabilitation.85
47
-------
TABLE 34. UNITED STATES STEEL CORP./FAIRFIELD WORKS IN FAIRFIELD, AL
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE;
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
No. 297
U.S. Steel/Still2
197897
5797
497
28
47-772
No. 997
Koppers-Becker97
19588
1974b»98
c, 72
6397
497
48
41-197
6,866
(appears to be for
operation; i.e., Nos.
5,930
(appears to be for
operation; i.e., Nos.
"Hot" Larry car2.8
Screw feed97
Automatic97
Simultaneous97
Mechanical97
1_4_2-3d)97
Buttner-Schilde-Haas
preheating process
with scrubber72>97
five battery
2,5,6,7, and 9)6
five battery
2,5,6,7, and 9)6
Larry car8
Gravity feed97
Manual97
Simultaneous98
Mechanical73
4-l-2-3e»97
Stage Charging6»7
(continued)
48
-------
TABLE 34 (continued)
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
MANUFACTURER: Ducon72
DATE INSTALLED: 197815>72
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION: • Single stage pre-
heating unit"'
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery Nos. 3,4,5,6,7, and 8 were shut down in 1977, 1977, 1980, 1980,
1979, and 1978, respectively.72'97
bBattery No. 9 was rebuilt in 1979.97
cBattery No. 9 on hot idle since Aug. 1980.72
°Nos. 1 and 4 discharge simultaneously, then Nos. 2 and 3 discharge
s imultaneously.9 7
eNos. 4 and 1 discharge simultaneously, then No. 2 discharges, followed by
No. 3; larry cars equipped with a coke side jumper pipe.97>9°
49
-------
TABLE 35. UNITED STATES STEEL CORP./FAIRLESS WORKS IN FAIRLESS HILLS, PA
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
No. I1
Wilputte1
19522
1978a>2
37!
399
28
13-61
41-01
No. 21
Wilputte1
19532
1978a>2
871
399
28
13-61
41-01
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
3,000 (both batteries combined)6
3,000 (both batteries combined)6
Larry car1
Turntable99
Manual99
Independent99
Larry car1
Turntable"
Manual"
Independent''
Nos. 1 and 3, then No. 2
(both batteries)99
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation2
50
-------
TABLE 36. UNITED STATES STEEL CORP./GARY WORKS IN GARY, IN
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in. ):
No. I100
Koppers-
Becker2
19708
1979b>2
852,8
4101
22,101
62,101
47-4101
No. 215
U.S. Steel/
Still2
19758
572, 8
453
22,8
62,101
47_10101
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
11,960 (all eight batteries combined)^
9,750 (all eight batteries combined)^
Larry car
8 Redler ("Precarbon")
Conveyor System8*
Turntable
feed100
Automatic100'102
Simultaneous100'102
Mechanical100
Nos. 1,4,3,2
100
ESPS53,101
197515
• System consists of 3
conveyors with each
conveyor controlled by
3 wet ESPs53,101
• Test Data (1978);101
"A" ESP—13,447 acfm at
295°F (avg.)
"B" ESP—15,649 acfra at
298°F (avg.)
"C" ESP—14,397 acfra at
301°F (avg.)
(continued)
51
-------
TABLE 36 (continued)
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:8
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in. ):
No. S1^
U.S. Steel/
Still2
19768
5?2,8
453
22,8
62,101
47_10101
No. 52
Wilputte2
19542
198822
772,102
3! 01, 103
22,101
32,101
37-5101
No. 72
Wilputte2
1954101
1978b>2
198822
772,102
3101,103
22,101
32,101
37-5101
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
See previous page*>
Redler Larry car**
("Precarbon")
Conveyor
System8>l°2
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM: ESPs53»101
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
197615
(repaired-
1981)101
• Same
description
as for
Battery No.
253,101
Larry car8
(continued)
52
-------
TABLE 36 (continued)
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
No. 132
Koppers-
Becker2
19512
!974b,2
198722
772,8
3101,103
1:2 2101
32,101
37-5101
No. 152
Wilputte2
19512»8
1977b»2
772,8
3101,103
12,101
32,101
37-5101
No. 162
Wilputte2
19492'8
1975b,2
198722
772,8
4101
12,101
32,101
37-5101
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
See previous pages"
Larry car" Larry car° Larry car8
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
53
-------
TABLE 37. UNITED STATES STEEL CORP./LORAIN—CUYAHOGA WORKS IN LORAIN, OH
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE: a
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:b
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in. ):
D2
Koppers-
Becker2
19572
198251
592
35
25,51
32,5
39-651
G2
Koppers-
Becker2
19562
19772
592
35
25,51
32,5
39-651
H2
Koppers-
Becker2
19552
19782
592
35
25,51
32»5
39-651
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
4,468 (all seven batteries combined)^
4,319 (all seven batteries combined)^
Larry car2 Larry carl Larry carl
Screw feed (all three batteries)5
Automatic (all three batteries)5
Simultaneous (all three batteries)5
Manual (all three batteries)5
Stage charging (all three batteries)51
(continued)
54
-------
TABLE 37 (continued)
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:a
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:b
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
Wilputte (all four batteries)2
19552 19472 19472
19792 19702 19702
198251
592,15 592»15 592
3 (each, all four batteries)-*
2 (each, all four batteries)-*>51
3 (each, all four batteries)2'5
39-6 (each, all four batteries)51
See previous page"
Larry car (all four batteries)2
Screw feed (all four batteries)5
Automatic (all four batteries)5
Simultaneous (all four batteries)5
Manual (all four batteries)5
Stage charging (all four batteries)5
L2
19472
19702
198251
592
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2
^Batteries D, K and L are scheduled to be shut down in 1982, but have applied
for stretch out to 1985.5
55
-------
TABLE 38. UNITED STATES STEEL CORP./GENEVA WORKS IN PROVO, UT
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION: No. 1
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
1
No. 2J
No. 31 No. 41
Koppers;1 Koppers-Becker104 (all four
batteries)
1944;2 19501 (all four batteries)
1979a>2 1979a»2
63 (each, all four batteries)1'104
3 (each, all four batteries)104'105
lU-OjlOA !3_6l (each, all four batteries)
40-5;104 42-01 (each, all four batteries)
2 (each, all four batteries)8'104
5,000;1 3,5586 (all four batteries
combined)
3,520 (all four batteries combined)6
Larry car (all four batteries)1
Gravity feed (all four batteries)106
Manual (all four batteries)106
Mechanical (all four batteries)105
Stage charging (all four batteries)105
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2
56
-------
TABLE 39. WHEELING-PITTSBURGH STEEL CORP./MON VALLEY PLANT IN MONESSEN, PA
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
COKE PRODUCTION:d
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
No. 1J
No. 2J
Koppers-Becker^
37c,107
446,107
2107
13-01
43-01
Koppers-Becker^
1956b'1
191,107
4108
2107,108
13-01
43-01
1,836 (both batteries combined)6
1,332 (both batteries combined)6
Larry carl
Gravity feed107
Manual107
Simultaneous107
Manual107
Nos. 1-4-2,
then 3107
Larry car1
Gravity feedl°7
Manual107
Simultaneous107
Manual107
Nos. 1-4-2,
then 3107
Stage charging108 Stage charging
108
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery No. 1 was rebuilt in 1981.46»107
"Battery No. 2 was rebuilt in 1979, which included conversion from a 3-hole,
single collector main to a 4-hole, double collector main battery.46,107
cBattery No. 1 originally had 74 ovens; 37 ovens were rebuilt in 1981, which
included conversion from a 3-hole, single collector main to a 4-hole double
collector main battery. The remaining 37 ovens are being converted to a
4-hole, double collector main battery.^6*-107
production data reflects the original two battery (93 oven) operation.6
57
-------
TABLE 40. WHEELING-PITTSBURGH STEEL CORP./STEUBENVILLE PLANT IN
EAST STEUBENVILLE, WV
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
No. I2
Koppers2
1917b,109
IN DATE: 1978e>2
)ATE:
478
469
INS: 12,109
32,109
37-5109
No. 22
Koppers2
1917C.109
I978e>2
472,8
4&9
]2,109
32,109
37-5109
No. 32
Koppers-
Becker2
I917d,109
1978e»2
5l2,8
469
12,109
32,109
37-5109
No. 82
Koppers2
19768,109
792,8
469
18,109
62,109
47-11109
5,205;6 4,400! (all four batteries combined)
4,310 (all four batteries combined)6
Larry car (all four batteries)**
Gravity feed (all four batteries)109
Manual109 Manual109 Manual109 Auto-
109
Manual69 Manual69 Manual69
matic
Mechan-
ical69
(continued)
58
-------
TABLE 40 (continued)
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
Stage charging
(battery Nos. 1,2 and 3)f>109
Nos. 1
and 4,
then 3,
then 2°9
Stage
charging^9
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aPlant shutdown Battery No. 4 (53 ovens) in 1977. Battery No. 5 (53 ovens)
in 1976, and Battery No. 6 (63 ovens) in 1977.109
bBattery No. 1 rebuilt in 1955.2,8,109
cBattery No. 2 rebuilt in 1953.2«8»109
dBattery No. 3 rebuilt in 1964.28>109
elnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2
^Larry cars equipped with jumper pipe located on coke side.
59
-------
o
o
O
G O
O
H
6
MATERIAL IN THIS SECTION SUBJECT TO CONFIDENTIALITY
REVIEW AND IS NOT RELEASABLE AS OF FEBRUARY 1, 1982.
FOR INFORMATION, CONTACT L. KESARI, U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY, DIVISION OF STATIONARY SOURCE ENFORCEMENT.
-------
TABLE 1. ALABAMA BY-PRODUCTS CORP./TARRANT COKE PLANT IN TARRANT, AL
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
No. 52
Koppers-Becker72
19412»72
I96072
252
172>73
13-672
No. 62
Koppers-Becker72
194172
I96072
292
3;73 472
3.72,73
13-672
2,400 (based on a four battery operation)^
1,200 (based on a four battery operation)^
Larry car2
Air pressure72
Automatic72
1-3-2, then 472
Stage charging°>73
Larry car2
Air pressure72
Automatic72
1-3-2, then 472
Stage chargingd>73
(continued)
60
-------
TABLE 1 (continued)
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. I;2 A72
Wilputte72
19682>72
197972
782«72
372,73
2 (piggyback)b»72>73
16-072
See previous
Pipeline0'2 or Larry car2
Air pressure72
Automatic72 Automatic72
1-2, then 372
Wet ESPe>72
Mikropul72
I96072
1-2, then 372
Stage chargingd>73
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery No. 2 was permanently shut down in August 1979.72
bTwo offtakes on push side act as double collector main.73
cCoaltek pipeline charge system was installed in 1975 with a design
capacity = 3,480 tons coal per day (operating capacity = 2,693 tons per day):
Due to economic reasons pipeline charging is not currently used, however
it does operate the majority of the time under normal circumstances.72
^Larry cars equipped with jumper pipes located on coke side.72>73
eSystem replaced a wet cyclonic venturi scrubber originally installed
in 1968.38
61
-------
TABLE 2. ALLIED CHEMICAL CORP./ASHLAND PLANT IN ASHLAND, KY
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in. ):
No. 32
Wilputte2
19532
1973C»2
76 2
3110
3.2,110
4.52
40-81H
No. 4a»2
Wilputte2
b
702
3111
2110,111
4.5.2 5112
46-lQlH
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
3,480 (both batteries combined)6
2,100 (both batteries combined)6
Larry car^>2
Gravity feed1!0
Larry care»2
Gravity feed1!0
Manual111
Either simulta-
neous or
independent-^
1 and 3, then 2111 1 and 3, then
Stage charging (both batteries)!-^
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery No. 4 was shut down in December 1980 due to low coke demand
bBattery No. 4 was rebuilt in 1978.2
clnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2
^Designed to deliver 670 cu ft of coal via 3 hoppers.HO
eTwo larry cars almost entirely new; capacity = 1,140 cu ft/charge
62
-------
TABLE 3. CARONDELET COKE8 IN ST. LOUIS, MO
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in. ):
A114
Wilputte114
1913114
1967114
35114
4! 15
ill4
32
37_0114
B2
Simon-
Carves2
1913114
1975114
18114
4115
X114
32
37_0114
C114
Koppers114
1952114
1974114
40114
4114
lH4
32
37-0114
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
1,000 (all three batteries combined)6
800 (all three batteries combined)6
Larry car (all three batteries)^'2
Gravity feed (all three batteries)114
Manual (all three batteries)114
Sequential charging (all three
batteries)b>115
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aPlant was previously owned by Great Lakes Carbon Corp. prior to January
1981.
new larry car with jumper pipe to be installed in March 1981.
63
-------
TABLE 4. CHATTANOOGA COKE AND CHEMICAL CORP./IN CHATTANOOGA, TN
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:b
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
No. I2
Semet/Solvay116
19182
I960116
24:2
12,116
3117
42
No. 22
Wilputte116
19412
I979a»2
20 2
3117
I2,116
3117
42
576 (both batteries combined)!16
Larry car2 Larry car2
Gravity feedH7 Gravity
Automatic1!6 Automatic!16
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2
batteries were converted from manual lid removal to automatic
in 1980-1981. I16
cLarry cars equipped with jumper pipes located on push side.H6
64
-------
TABLE 5. CITIZENS GAS AND COKE UTILITY IN INDIANAPOLIS, IN
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in. ):
E2
Wilputte2*118
19462
472
4120
12
4120
42
H2
Koppers2
19 41 2
4lH8
4120
12
4120
42
X2,118
Dravo-Still119
19792
722
3120
2119
3120
52,119
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
1,086 (E and H batteries
combined)^
1,002 (E and H batteries
combined)**
1,645120
Larry car (all three batteries)2,120
Gravity feed (all three batteries)!2!
Manual!2! Manual!2! Automatical
Independent (all three batteries)H8>l2l
Manual120 Manual20 Mechanical!20
4,l,3,2l2! 4,1,3,2121 1,3,1,2121
Stage charging (all three batteries)^'12°
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBatteries F and G, both 40 oven Wilputte batteries started up in 1926 and
1929, respectively, were shut down in 1979.121
car equipped with jumper pipe located on coke side (Batteries E
and H).120
65
-------
TABLE 6. DETROIT COKE CO. IN DETROIT, MI
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:b
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
No. 62
Semet/Solvay2
19682»122
1978a»2
702,122
3122
I;2.123 2 (piggyback)122
16-8122
47^122
2,1506
2.0006
Larry car122
Turntable122
Automatic123
Simultaneously12^
No. 2, then Nos. 1 and 312A
Stage charging123
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2
to January 1980, under ownership of Allied Chem. Co., pipeline
charging was utilized. Preheater consisted of two units controlled by
independent (Swemco) wet venturi scrubbers installed in 1973. 38>122, 125
66
-------
TABLE 7. DONNER-HANNA COKE CORP. IN BUFFALO, NY
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
AB2
Koppers2
19512
512
325
l2,26
4.2 226
No. 32
Koppers2
19642
502
325
!-2 276
42,26
No. 42
Koppers2
19672
502
325
1:2 226
42,26
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
3,004 (all three batteries combined)6
3,004 (all three batteries combined)6
Larry car2 Larry car2 Larry car2 or
Pipeline26
Manual26
Automatic26 Automatic26
Stage charging (for all batteries)a»25,26
ESP on Battery No. 4 preheaterb»26
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aStage charging on Battery No. 4 when using wet coal.26
bprecarbon preheater for dry coal.26
67
-------
TABLE 8. EMPIRE COKE CO. IN HOLT, AL
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
No. I2
Semet/Solvay77
1906a»77
No. 2 2
Semet/Solvay77
I906a»77
202,77
378
12,77
32,78
402,7
378
l2,77
32,78
360 (both batteries combined)6
Larry car2
Screw feed77
Manual''
Larry car2
Screw feed77
Manual77
1-3-278 1-3-278
Sequential charging (both batteries)***78
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBoth batteries were rebuilt in 1978.2
^Larry cars equipped with jumper pipes located on coke side.78
68
-------
TABLE 9. MERCIER CORP./ERIE COKE AND CHEMICALS IN PAINESVILLE, OH
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-In.):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
No. I2
No. 22
Koppers-Becker2 Koppers-Becker2
1926a»126 I926a>126
232
3-127 4128
232
3-127 4128
]/
42
450 (both batteries combined)6
400 (both batteries combined)6
Larry car2
Gravity feed84
Manual84
Simultaneous84
Manual127
Larry car2
Gravity feed84
Manual84
Simultaneous84
Manual127
Nos. 1 and 4, then 3, then 2
(both batteries)128
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM: Stage charging (both batteries)127
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery was rebuilt in 1972.2>22
69
-------
TABLE 10. INDIANA GAS AND CHEMICAL CORP. IN TERRE HAUTE, IN
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
OVEN LENGTH (ft-ln. ):
No. I2
19192
1978a»2
302
4129
I2
42
30-Q130
No. 22
19262
I978a»2
302
4129
I2
42
30_ol30
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
400 (both batteries combined)6
340 (both batteries combined)6
Larry car2 Larry car2
Gravity feed130 Gravity feed130
Automatic130 Automatic130
1 and 4, 2
and 3130
1 and 4. 2
and 3130
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM: Stage charging (both batteries)b>129
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2
^Larry car equipped with jumper pipe located on coke side.12"
70
-------
TABLE 11. IRONTON COKE CORP./A SUBSIDIARY OF McLOUTH
STEEL CORP. IN IRONTON, OH
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in. ):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
No. lb»2
Semet/Solvay131
19172,131
1947d,131
68131
4131,132
3.2,131
11-1131
35-6131
No. 2C>2
Wilputtel3!
1954131
1978e,131
24131
4131,132
12,131
12-2131
36-4131
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
2,650 (for a three battery operation)6
2,223 (for a three battery operation)6
Larry car!31>132 Larry car2
Gravity feed5 Gravity feed5
Manual5
Simultaneous5
Manual5
Simultaneous5
Manual5
Manual5
No. 4 (coke side), No. 1 (push side),
No. 3, then No. 2 (both batteries)5
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM: Stage charging (both batteries)f.131,132
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery No. 3 (76 ovens—Wilputte) presently shut down.5
^Battery No. 1 operating on a 48-hour coke time to keep ovens warm.5
cBattery No. 2 was shut down between January 1980 and February 1981. During
the shut down period the pipeline charging (Coaltek-scrubber control) system
was replaced by larry car. Presently the battery is on hot idle.5*131,132
^Involved the addition of ovens.131
elnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2,131
^Larry cars equipped with jumper pipe located on coke side (Battery No. 1)
and push side (Battery No. ?.)•-
71
-------
TABLE 12. JIM WALTER RESOURCES, INC./COKE, IRON AND CHEMICALS
DIVISION IN BIRMINGHAM, AL
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
iTTKRY DESIGNATION:8
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in. ):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
No. 32
Koppers2
19522
1979b,72
302
473
12
14-072
No. 42
Koppers2
19562
1980^,72
302
473
I2 .
14-072
No. 52
Koppers2
19592
198lb,72
602
473
I2
14-072
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
2,760 (based on a five battery operation)"
2,400 (based on a five battery operation)^
Larry car (all three batteries)2
Air pressure (all three batteries)2
Automatic (all three batteries)72
Manual (all three batteries)73
1-3-2, then 4 (all three batteries)73
Stage charging (all three batteries)0»73
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery Nos. 1 and 2 were shut down in August 1980.72
^Involved standpipe replacement and top side work.72
cLarry cars equipped with jumper pipes located on coke side.73
72
-------
TABLE 13. KOPPERS CO., INC./INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS DIVISION,
ERIE PLANT IN ERIE, PA
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATIONS
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS :c
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in. ):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
A2
Koppers2
1943b,133
232
5134
1
12-0135
42-Q135
B2
Koppers2
1943b>2
352
5134
1
12-0135
42-0135
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
730;1 6256 (both batteries combined)
600 (both batteries combined)6
Larry car2
Gravity
Independent 136
Larry car2
Gravity feed!36
Manuall36
Independentl36
Stage charging (both batteries)d»136
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aFacility previously owned and operated by Interlake, Inc.l
bBattery was rebuilt in 1971.2
cBatteries A and B to incorporate new standpipes by 1981.136
"Larry cars equipped with jumper pipe located at push side.136
73
-------
TABLE 14. KOPPERS CO., INC./INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS DIVISION, TOLEDO PLANT
IN TOLEDO, OH
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
C2,137
Wilputte2
19532,137
57a,2,138
4139
]2,137
37-7137
8146
7026
Larry car2
Gravity feed140
Manual140
Manual139
Stage chargingb>138>139
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery C was on hot idle from September 1980 to August 1981.139,140
"Larry car equipped with jumper pipe located on push side.13''
74
-------
TABLE 15. KOPPERS CO., INC./INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS DIVISION, WOODWARD PLANT
IN WOODWARD, AL
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in. ):
No. I2
f\
Koppers21
197772
602,141
4141
2141
4;2 3141
39-0141
No. 2A2
Koppers2
197772
40141
4141
2141
4; 2 3141
39-0141
No. 2fi2
Koppers2
193772
1978c,72
38141
4141
!l41
4.2 3141
39_0141
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
2,047 (all five batteries combined)6
1,272 (all five batteries combined)6
Larry car2 Larry car2 Larry car2
Gravit
Manual73
Manual73
Stage charging (both
batteries)/3
Gravity
Gravity
feedl41
Manuall41 Manuall41 Manuall41
Manual73
Stage
charging^*73
(continued)
75
-------
TABLE 15 (continued)
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-In.):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
No. 4A and 4Bb>141 No. 5b»2
Koppers2
194972
1981c,72
582
472
]2,72
14-072
See previous page"
Larry car2
Air pressure72
Manual'2
Koppers2
195272
1978C»72
302
472
I2,72
14-072
Larry car2
Air pressure72
Manual72
Stage charging (both batteries)^>7^
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery No. 3 was permanently shut down in November 1974.72
^Battery Nos. 4A, 4B, and 5 were idling hot for a 14-month period (May 1980-
July 1981) and were recharged in July 1981.73
clnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.72
^Larry cars equipped with jumper pipes located on coke side.7^
76
-------
TABLE 16. MILWAUKEE SOLVEY COKE CO./DIVISION OF PICKANDS MATHER AND CO.
IN MILWAUKEE, WI
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:3
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
No. 32
No. 42
402
3142
3.2,144
32
20-Q143
60 2
3142
12,144
32
20-01*3
800 (both batteries combined)6
725 (both batteries combined)6
Larry car2
Screw feed I4 3
Manual143
Independent^ 3
2 and 1, then
3142
Larry car2
Screw
Manual^
Independent!^
Mechanical!42
2 and 1, then
Stage charging (both
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBoth batteries were rebuilt in 1974.2
^Larry car equipped with jumper pipe located on coke side.
77
-------
TABLE 17. PHILADELPHIA COKE CO., INC. IN PHILADELPHIA, PA
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
A/B2
Koppers-Becker145
19292
742
3145,146
1:2 2145
42
40-0145
9406
Larry car2
Gravity feed145
Manual145
Independent145
Manual145
Push side, coke side, center
port
145
Stage charging14**
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
78
-------
TABLE 18. TONAWANDA COKE CORP. IN TONWANDA, NY
COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
No. 226
Wilputte2
19622
602
325
I2
4i-226
1.7906
9006
Larry car2
Gravity feed26
Stage charging2^
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery No. 1 was shut down in June 1972.26
79
-------
MATERIAL IN THIS SECTION SUBJECT TO CONFIDENTIALITY
REVIEW AND IS NOT RELEASABLE AS OF FEBRUARY 1, 1982. "o
FOR INFORMATION, CONTACT L. KESARI, U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL R
PROTECTION AGENCY, DIVISION OF STATIONARY SOURCE ENFORCEMENT.
o w
<; M
W bd
a w
2;
o o
Q
H
2!
O
-------
REFERENCES
COKE OVEN CHARGING
1. World Steel Industry Data Handbook: Vol. 1. The United States.
McGraw-Hill Magazine. 1978. pp. 20-25. (Reliability No. 4.)
2. Technical Approach for a Coke Production Cost Model. PEDCo
Environmental, Inc., EPA Contract No. 68-02-3071. pp. 39-50.
(Reliability No. 4.)
3. EPA Region V File review by GCA/Technology Division, December 1981.
4. Telephone conversation. Steve Samorgin, Ohio Air Pollution
Control-Soutwest District to Sandy Beaton, GCA/Technology Division.
October 1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
5. EPA Region V Engineer's comments to GCA questionnaires, December 1981.
6. Development Document for Proposed Effluent Limitations Guidelines and
Standards for the Iron and Steel Manufacturing Point Source Category.
EPA 440/l-79/024a, Draft Report Vol. II. U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Effluent Guidelines Division Office of Water and Waste
Management, Washington DC. October 1979. pp. 18-49. (Reliability
No. 4.)
7. Telephone conversation. John Hepola, U.S. EPA Region VI to Michael
Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division. November 1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
8. Cost Effectiveness Model for Pollution Control of Coke Facilities.
EPA-600/2-79-185. Aug. 1979. Table 8. (Reliability No. 4.)
9. EPA Region V Files (Notes in file).
10. EPA Region V Files (Renewal Permit Application dated 1/26/79, No.
1309010006P013).
11. Alliance Machine Co. Advertisement in Iron and Steel Engineer.
(Reliability No. 4.)
12. Summary Data compiled by PEDCo Environmentalists, Inc., from stack test
reports contained in regional EPA offices. Provided to JACA Corp. for
steel library by Tom Maslany, EPA Region III. (Reliability No. 1.)
80
-------
13. ARMCO's Coke Batteries Scheduled for Mid-1976 Start-up. Iron and Steel
Engineer. 52(9):61. September 1975. (Reliability No. 4.)
14. Draft Inspection Report. Halcon Car Operation/Battery 5, Bethlehem Steel
Corporation, Bethlehem, PA. JACA Corp. Sept. 19, 1979. RACT Box No.
503615-503694. (Reliability No. 1.)
15. Telephone conversation. Bernard Bloom, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Division of Stationary Source Enforcement to Michael Jasinski,
GCA/Technology Division. (Reliability No. 2.)
16. Telephone converstion and letter response. Bill Nuver, Pennsylvania
Department of Environmental Resources, Bethlehem, PA, to Sandy Beaton,
GCA/Technology Division. November 1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
17. Letter from J. McGrogan, Pennsylvania Department of Environmental
Resources to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Divsion. Received March 19,
1981. (Reliability No. 1.)
18. Petroccia, M. et al. Field Inspection Report. Bethlehem Steel
Corporation Burn Harbor Coke Batteries 1 and 2, Chesterton, Indiana.
GCA/Technology Division-Report No. GCA-TR-80-56-G. Prepared for U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency. July 1980. (Reliability No. 1.)
19. Telephone conversation. Andy Sunderland, Indiana State Air Pollution
Control to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. March 3, 1981.
(Reliability No. 2.)
20. Telephone conversation. Bob Clark, Pennsylvania Department of
Environmental Resources, Ebensburg, PA, to Michael Jasinski,
GCA/Technology Division. October 29, 1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
21. RACT Box No. 503717-403719. (Reliability No. 1.)
22. Computer printout prepared for U.S. EPA by PEDCo Environmentalists, Inc.
Coke Oven Battery data compilation, received from Bernard Bloom by
Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division. (Reliability No. 3-4.)
23. Telephone conversation. Bob Clark, Pennsylvania Department of
Environmental Resources to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. March
2, 1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
24. Goldman, Leonard J. and David W. Coy. Technical Support Document for
Control of Coke Oven Fusing Emissions. RTI Document. RACT Box No.
506379-506486. (Reliability No. 1.)
25. Telephone conversation. Jack Hausrath, Erie County Dept. of Health, New
York to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. February 17, 1981.
(Reliability No. 2.)
26. Letter response. Richard Craig, U.S. EPA Region II to William Farino,
GCA/Technology Division. November 1981. (Reliability No. 1.)
81
-------
27. Telephone conversation. Ralph Hall, Maryland Department of Health and
Mental Hygiene to Michai-.l Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division. November
1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
28. Telephone conversation. Mark Sylvester, Maryland Department of Health
and Mental Hygiene to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division.
February 13, 1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
29. Oliver, J. F. and J. T Sorve. Control of Visible Missions at CF&I Steel
Corporation, Pueblo, CO. JAPCA.29(9):920-925, September 1976.
(Reliability No. 1.)
30. Dion, J.A., and G. A. Young. Coke Battery Survey, CF&I Steel
Corporation, Pueblo, CO. EPA-330/1-78-005. RACT No. 503469-start.
April 1979. (Reliability No. 1.)
31. EPA Region V Files (confidential letter response by Ford to EPA
questionnaire—2/21/78).
32. Nunno, Thomas, et al. Assessment of Air Emissions from Steel Plant
Sources. Ford Motor Company/Dearborn, MI. GCA Report No. TR-81-38-G.
Prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. April 1981.
(Reliability No. 1.)
33. Spawn, Peter, et al. Assessment of Air Emissions from Steel Plant
Operations. Inland Steel/Indiana Harbor Works. GCA Report No.
TR-80-85-G. Prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. August
1980. (Reliability No. 1.)
34. Inland Steel Publication: Air, Water, and Inland Steel, pp. 34-41.
(Reliability No. 4.)
35. Telephone conversation. Don Kuh, Indiana State Air Pollution Control to
Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. March 4, 1981. (Reliability
No. 2.)
36. EPA Region V Files (August 1981 letter from Inland Steel Co. to EPA).
37. Test of the Air Pollution Scrubber System Vent Stack of the Northside
Preheater Line at C Battery, Coke Plant No. 3. Inland Steel Co., Inland
Steel Central Engineering and Koppers Company Report. RACT No. 512991.
(Reliability No. 1.)
38. Balch, George E. Closed Pipeline Charging of Coke Ovens Using the
Coaltek™ System. Presented at the 67th Annual Meeting of the Air
Pollution Control Assoc. in Denver. June 1974. (Reliability No. 4.)
39. Inland Steel Publication: Air Water and Inland Steel, pp 34-41.
(Reliability No. 4.)
40. EPA Region V Files (1979 Tests on No. 11 battery preheater at Inland).
82
-------
41. EPA Region V Files (1981 tests on No. 1 preheater unit (Batt. 11) at
Inland).
42. EPA Region V Files (Trip Report at Interlake—6/80).
43. Telephone conversation. Mr. Sulkorowski, City of Chicago Environmental
Department to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division. December 10,
1980. (Reliability No. 2.)
44. EPA Region V Files (Interlake 1972 Operating Permits).
45. Telephone conversation. Mr. Sulkorowski, City of Chicago Department of
Inspectional Services to Marc Grant, GCA/Technology Division. March 5,
1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
46. Telephone conversation. Ken Bowman, Pennsylvania Department of
Environmental Resources to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.
February 18, 1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
47. Petroccia, M., et al. Assessment of Air Emissions from and Controls for
Iron and Steel Making Sources. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp./Aliquippa
Works. GCA Report No. TR-81-57-G. Prepared for U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency. May 1981. (Reliability No. 1.)
48. Subberland, T. K., et al• Environmental Assessment of Emission from a
Coal Preheater. York Research Corporation, March 3, 1980. Contract No.
68-02-2819; RACT 512673. (Reliability No. 1.)
49. Stack Test Report No. 5877A and 5877B by PADER, testing done on 11/29/71
on No. 1 and No. 2 Preheater Stacks, JACA Library. (Reliability No. 1.)
50. An Emission/Efficiency Evaluation of the A-5 Coke Oven Battery North Ree
Heat Bleed Venturi Scrubber System at the Aliquippa Works of the Jones &
Laughlin Steel Corporation, Pittsburgh, PA. Betz Environmental
Engineers. May 1971. (RACT 503063.) (Reliability No. 1.)
51. Telephone conversation. Ted Davis, Northeast District Ohio EPA to Gene
Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. February 27, 1981. (Reliability
No. 2.)
52. EPA Region V File review by GCA, December 1981.
53. Telephone conversation. Edward Wojciechowski, EPA Region V to Gene
Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. February 4, 1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
54. EPA Region V Files (letter from J&L to EPA—4/78).
55. Telephone conversation. Don Kuh, Indiana State Board of Health to Sandy
Beaton, GCA/Technology Division. November 1981. (Reliability No. 2.).
56. Telephone conversation. S. Banninthaya, Allegheny County Health
Department to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. February 12, 1981.
(Reliability No. 2.)
83
-------
57. Telephone conversation. S. Banninthaya, Allegheny County Health
Department to Sandy Beaton, GCA/Technology Division. November 3, 1981.
(Reliability No. 2.)
58. Spawn, P. and R. Li. Field Inspection Report. Kaiser Steel Corporation,
Fontanna Works. Coke Plant, Fontana, California. GCA/Technology
Division Draft Final Report No. GCA-TR-80-53-G. Prepared for U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency. February 1980. (Reliability No. 1.)
59. Current Domestic Expansion and Modernization Programs. Iron & Steel
Engineer, Feb. 1980. (Reliability No. 4.)
60. Simonson, A. V. Report of Results for Visible Emissions Testing of the
Lone Star Steel Coke Oven Battery, Lone Star, Texas. Dec. 26, 1979.
Radian Corporation. Radian Report No. 211-001 (RACT-501518).
(Reliability No. 1.)
61. Telephone conversation. Tom Blair, Radian Corp., in Austin, Texas to
Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. March 3, 1981. (Reliability No.
2.)
62. Telephone conversation. Lawrence Pewitt, Texas Air Control Board to
Sandy Beaton, GCA/Technology Division. November 1981. (Reliability
No. 2.)
63. EPA Region V files (NSC/GLS data supplied to EPA).
64. EPA Region V files (GLS response to EPA questionnaire—Feb. 21, 1978).
65. Fodor, R. J. New Coke Oven Facilities at Great Lakes Steel. Iron &
Steel Engineer. 48(9):79-84. September 1971. (Reliability No. 3.)
66. Telephone conversation. Anton Telford, Illinois Environmental Protection
Agency to Sandy Beaton, GCA/Technology Division. November 1981.
(Reliability No. 2.)
67. Formadley, Robert J. Granite City: Bold Modernization of an Integrated
Steel Plant. Iron & Steel Engineer, August 1980. pp. S1-67-SL-80.
(Reliability No. 4.)
68. Spawn, Peter, et al. Assessment of Air Emissions from Iron & Steelmaking
Sources. National Steel Corp./Weirton Steel Division. GCA Report No.
TR-81-118-G. Prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Novebmer 1981. (Reliability No. 1.)
69. Telephone conversation. John Raggi, West Virginia Air Polluton Control^
to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. February 17, 1981.
(Reliability No. 2.)
70. Building 87-oven Coke Battery at Weirton. Iron & Steel Engineer.
December 1970, p. 139. (Reliability No. 4.)
84
-------
71. Weirton Steel Division—Brown's Island Coke Plant. Iron & Steel
Engineer. January 1977. p. 61. (Reliability No. 4.)
72. Letter response. Paul Pate, Director, Jefferson County Department of
Health to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division. December 1981.
(Reliability No. 1.)
73. Telephone conversation. Veda Hampton, Jefferson County Department of
Health to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. February 25, 1981.
(Reliability No. 2.)
74. EPA Region V files (Report prepared by Arthur D. Little, Inc. regarding a
new coke battery at RSC-1978).
75. Telephone conversation. Mr. Habib, Cleveland Air Pollution^ Control to
Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. February 27, 1981. (Reliability
No. 2.)
76. Telephone conversation. Mr. Habib, Cleveland Air Pollution Control to
Sandy Beaton, GCA/Technology Division. November 1981. (Reliability
No. 2.)
77. Telephone conversation. Sue Robertson, Alabama State Air Pollution
Control to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division. November 1981.
(Reliability No. 2.)
78. Telephone conversation. Sue Robertson, Alabama State Air Pollution
Control to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. February 25, 1981.
(Reliability No. 2.)
79. Telephone conversation. Andy Pasko, Canton City Department of Health to
Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. March 5, 1981. (Reliability
No. 2.)
80. Telephone conversation and letter response. Andy Pasko, Canton City
Department of Health to Sandy Beaton, GCA/Technology Division. November
1981. (Reliability No. 1.)
81. Letter communication. Anthony F. Fazio, Vice President, Chemico Air
Pollution Control Corporation, Division of Envirotech Corporation to
Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division. December 1980.
82. EPA Region V files (Trip Report by Dan Balk (February 20, 1980).
83. EPA Revion V files (1974 permits).
84. Letter response. Dennis Bush. Ohio Environmental Protection Agency—
Northeast District to Sandy Beaton, GCA/Technology Division. November
1981. (Reliability No. 1.)
85
-------
85. Spawn, P. et al., Field .Inspection Report, GCA/Technology Division.
Report No. TR-80-30-G. Prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency. April 1980. (Reliability No. 1.)
86. Numson, et al. Emission Control in Coke Operations by Use of Stage
Charging. 24(11):1059. November 1974. (Reliability No. 1.)
87. Source Sheet on USSC Clairton Coke Battery No. 7. RACT-500478
(Reliability No. 1.)
88. Source Sheet on USSC Clairton Coke Battery No. 8. RACT-500484
(Reliability No. 1.)
89. Source Sheet on USSC Clairton Coke Battery No. 9. RACT-500490
(Reliability No. 1.)
90. Source Sheet on USSC Clairton Coke Battery No. 15. RACT-500526
(Reliability No. 1.)
91. Source Sheet on USSC Clairton Coke Battery No. 16. RACT-500528
(Reliability No. 1.)
92. Source Sheet on USSC Clairton Coke Battery No. 17. RACT-500541
(Reliability No. 1.)
93. Source Sheet on USSC Clairton Coke Battery No. 19. RACT-500553
(Reliability No. 1.)
94. Source Sheet on USSC Clairton Coke Battery No. 20. RACT-500562
(Reliability No. 1.)
95. Source Sheet on USSC Clairton Coke Battery No. 15. RACT-500569
(Reliability No. 1.)
96. Source Sheet on USSC Clairton Coke Battery No. 15. RACT-500581
(Reliability No. 1.)
97. Spawn, P., et al., Field Inspection Report. USSC Fairfield Works Coke
Plant, Fairfield, Alabama. GCA/Technology Division Final Report
TR-79-59-G. Prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. November
1980. (Reliability No. 1.)
98. Coke Battery Survey Procedures Description and Data Presentation. USSC
Fairfield Works, Fairfield, Alabama. December 1977. EPA-330/1-77-012.
RACT No. 501519 (start). (Reliability No. 1.)
99. Telephone conversation and letter response. Tom McGinley, Pennsylvania
Department of Environmental Resources to Sandy Beaton, GCA/Technology
Division. November 4, 1981 (Reliability No. 1.)
100. Jones L. G. Trip Report on U.S. Steel Gary No. 1, Coke Battery.
September 1, 1976. RACT 502201 (start). (Reliability No. 1.)
86
-------
101. EPA Region V file (U.S. Steel/Gary response to EPA interrogatory—1979).
102. EPA Region V files (U.S. Steel/Gary Litigation Report—12/77).
103. Telephone conversation. Roland Elvambuena, City of Gary Air Pollution
Control Division, Gary Health Department to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology
Division. March 5, 1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
104. National Enforcement Investigation Center. Report on Plant Inspection at
U.S. Steel Corp./Geneva Works. 1977. (Reliability No. 2.)
105. Telephone conversation. Mr. Kopta, Utah State Air Pollution Control to
Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. February 27, 1981. (Reliability
No. 2.)
106. Telephone conversation. Dave Kopta, Utah State Mr Pollution Control to
Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division. November 1981. (Reliability
No. 2.)
107. Telephone conversation and letter response. Richard Thomas, Pennsylvania
Department of Environmental Resources to Sandy Beaton, GCA/Technology
Division. December 1981. (Reliability No. 1.)
108. Telephone conversation. Tony Johnson, Pennsylvania Department of
Environmental Resources to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.
February 26, 1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
109. Telephone conversation and letter response. John Raggi, West Virginia
Air Pollution Control to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division.
November 1981. (Reliability No. 1.)
110. Coke-Oven Charging Car Effectively Controls Emissions. Iron & Steel
Engineer. 57(6):67. June 1980. (Reliability No. 4.)
111. Letter response. James W. Dills, Department for Natural Resources and
Environmental Protection to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division.
February 26, 1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
112. Emission test report. Submitted to Allied Chemical Company, Semet-Solvay
Division, Ashland, KY, The Minister Stein System. York Research Corp.
Report No. 1-9868-04. June 7, 1979. (Reliability No. 1.)
113. Letter response. James Dills, Department for Natural Resources and
Environmental Protection to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division.
November 19, 1981. (Reliability No. 1.)
114. Letter response. Richard Knapp, Division of Air Pollution Control, City
of St. Louis, MO to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division.
November 2, 1981. (Reliability No. 1.)
115. Telephone conversation. Tom Scheppers, State of Missouri APC to Gene
Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. February 24, 1981. (Reliability
No. 2.)
87
-------
116. Telephone conversation. Harvey Rice, Chattanooga Mr Pollution Control
Bureau to Michael JasinsdL, GCA/Technology Division. October 26, 1981.
(Reliability No. 2.)
117. Telephone conversation. Harvey Rice, Chattanooga APC Bureau to Michael
Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division. February 18, 1981. (Reliability
No. 2.)
118. EPA Region V files. (Data supplied by Citizens Gas & Coke to EPA in
1977.)
119. The Fabric Filter Newsletter, Mcllvaine Inc. publication, June 10, 1980,
No. 56, pg. 5. (Reliability No. 4.)
120. Telephone conversation. Dave Jordan, Indianapolis APC Board to Gene
Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. March 3, 1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
121. Telephone conversation. Dave Jordan, Indianapolis Air Pollution Control
Board to Sandy Beaton, GCA/Technology Division. November 1981.
(Reliability No. 2.)
122. EPA Region V files. (Detroit Coke.)
123. EPA Region V files. (Houser & Carafas Eng. Co. report to Allied
Chem.—2/11/77.)
124. EPA Region V files. (5/28/80 EPA Inspection of Detroit Coke.)
125. EPA Region V files. (3/6/81 Inspection Report of Detroit Coke.)
126. EPA Region V files. (Consent Decree dated 2/5/79—Exhibit No. 2.)
127. Telephone conversation. Dennis Bush, NE District Ohio EPA to Gene
Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. February 27, 1981. (Reliability
No. 2.)
128. EPA Region V files. (Coke Plant work practice rules.)
129. Telephone conversation. Ken Kearney, Indiana State APC to Gene Bergson,
GCA/Technology Division. March 4, 1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
130. Telephone conversation. George Karp, City of Terre Haute Air Pollution
Control to Sandy Beaton, GCA/Technology Division. October 1981.
(Reliability No. 2.)
131. EPA Region V files. (Progress Report, May 1981, from Plant to EPA.)
132. Telephone conversation. Frank Phillips, Portsmouth City Department of
Health to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. February 27, 1981.
(Reliability No. 2.)
133. RACT Box No. 503715-503716. (Reliability No. 1.)
88
-------
134. Telephone conversation. Larry Wonders, Pennsylvania Department of
Environmental Resources to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.
February 17, 1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
135. RACT No. 503715-503716. (Reliability No. 2.)
136. Telephone conversation. Bill Charleton, Pennsylvania Department of
Environmental Resources to Sandy Beaton, GCA/Technology Division.
November 9, 1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
137. Revion V files. (Permit Applications—no date.)
138. Region V files. (Acurex Stack Test Observation of Push System on
July 1980.)
139. Telephone conversation. Tom Doktor, Toledo Air Pollution Control to Gene
Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. February 27, 1981. (Reliability
No. 2.)
140. Telephone conversation. Tom Doktor, Toledo Air Pollution Control to
Sandy Beaton, GCA/Technology Division. November 1981. (Reliability
No. 2.)
141. Jasinski, M. R. Field Inspection Report of Major Air Point Source
Facilities in Region IV, EPA Contract No. 68-01-4143, RE; Koppers Co.,
Inc., Woodward, Alabama Coke Plant, Inspected by GCA on July 8 and 9,
1980. (Reliability No. 1.)
142. Telephone conversation. Jerry Bevington, Milwaukee County Air Pollution
Control to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. March 9, 1981.
(Reliability No. 2.)
143. Telephone conversation. Jerry Bevington, Milwaukee County Air Pollution
Control to Sandy Beaton, GCA/Technology Division. November 1981.
(Reliability No. 2.)
144. EPA Region V files. (Milwaukee Solvay.)
145. Telephone conversation and letter response. Norman Glazer, City of
Philadelphia Air Management Services to Sandy Beaton, GCA/Technology
Division. November 1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
146. Telephone conversation. Robert King, Philadelphia Air Management to Gene
Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. February 13, 1981. (Reliability
No. 2.)
89
-------
MATERIAL IN THIS SECTION SUBJECT TO CONFIDENTIALITY
REVIEW AND IS NOT RELEASABLE AS OF FEBRUARY 1, 1982.
FOR INFORMATION, CONTACT L. KESARI, U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY, DIVISION OF STATIONARY SOURCE ENFORCEMENT.
n
o
60 O
> W
n
o
Q
-------
TABLE 1. ARMCO INC./HAMILTON PLANT IN HAMILTON, OH
COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in. ):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. I1 No. 21 No. 31 No. 4*
Koppers-Becker (all four batteries)2
1927a»3 19381 19411 194 71
1976b»2 1977*>>2 1978^,2
12-51
151
12-51
251
12-51
251
12-51
1,930 (all four batteries combined)4
1,811 (all four batteries combined)4
Granite City, one-spot car serves all four
batteries5>6
Scrubber5
Ducon5
19796,7
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
^Battery rebuilt in 1961.*
^Involved end-flue rehabilitation.2
90
-------
TABLE 2. ARMCO INC./HOUSTON WORKS IN HOUSTON, TX
COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:3
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. I1
Koppers-Becker2
19432
19762
13-131
No. 21
Koppers-Becker2
19531
19772
151
13-131
1,045 (both batteries combined)4
840 (both batteries combined)4
Shed serves each battery!,5
Common wet ESPs (east and west) serve both
batteries8'9
Mikropul5>9
19765>7
• Two wet ESPs, each containing two fields
and two I.D. fans operate in parallel.7'9
• Each fan rated at 100,000 acfm using 300-
hp motor.'
• Test Data (1979);1:L»12
182,537-197,053 acfm (outlet-range)
93-105°F (range)
• Test Data (1977);10
204,529-214,331 acfm (outlet-range)
100-102°F (range)
• Test Data (1976);9
Inlet—234,477-237,618 acfm (range)
105-115°F (range)
Outlet—203,925-206,338 acfm (range)
73-78°F (range)
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2
91
-------
TABLE 3. ARMCO INC./MIDDLETOWN WORKS IN MIDDLETOWN, OH
COKE PLANT NO. 2
COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:3
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:*
No. I1
Wilputte1
19532,13
761
13-61
5,150 (Coke plants No. 2 and 3 combined)4
4,890 (Coke plants No. 2 and 3 combined)4
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aLand-based system with baghoise required by Consent Decree in 1982.
92
-------
TABLE 4. ABMCO INC./MIDDLETOWN WORKS IN MIDDLETOWN, OH
COKE PLANT NO. 3
COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No.
No. 21'15
Dravo-Stilll.l5
19771.15
571.15
19-81
Dravo-Sti.il1>!5
19 761
571.15
19-81
See previous
Dravo-Osterf ield, one-spot cars serve both
batteries3. 7»16
Venturi scrubbers' »1"
Ducon (Model DVO)7»16
1976 (battery No. 1) and 1977 (battery
No. 2)7» I6
• Each car contains two venturi scrubbers,
-j r
and two exhaust fans.'
• Each scrubber designed for 34,426 acfm at
• Ap (design) = 25 in H207»l6
• 200-hp fan motors7
• Scrubber water supplied at 170 gpm and
15 psig7
• L/G (each scrubber-calculated) = 4.9!^
• Coke guide also ducted to main car by
30-hp fan, and 5,900 scfm at 70°F7
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aOne car serves as a spare.7.!''
93
-------
TABLE 5. BETHLEHEM STEEL CORP./BETHLEHEM PLANT IN BETHLEHEM, PA
COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
2A2
2B2
3A2
3B2
Koppers-Becker (all four batteries)2
19412 19412 19422 19422
32
102b»1>18
102C,1.,18
5,840 (all six batteries combined)4
5,058 (all six batteries combined)4
Chemico H-II, one-spot car serves all four
batteries7*16
Scrubber1^
Aronetics, Inc.'
198018,20
(continued)
94
-------
TABLE 5 (continued)
COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTQ
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
52,15
Koppers-Becker2
1953a»2
802,15
42,15 '
See previous
Chemico H-II,
one-spot car serves
battery No. 519»21
Scrubber!9>21
Aronetics, Inc.7»21
197918,20
• Design gas flow =
88,000 scfm (push),
60,000 scfm (during
travel)2!
• Design water flow =
400 gpm (push); 190
gpm (travel)15
• L/G (by wt.; avg.)
0.8 (push); 0.4
(travel)15
• 20% of H-II blowdown
is recycled to
quench tower21
• Test Data
(1979)J-5T22
Flow (range) =
72,642-75,861 dscfm
Avg. water flow =
397 gpm (push);
193 gpm (travel)
McKee-Otto2
19762,7
802
62,7
Bench mounted hood-
fixed duct serves
battery A7
Venturi scrubbers7
AAF7
19765,23
• System contains two
venturi scrubbers
operated in
parallel7
• Inlet gas flow =
77,000 acfm @ 212°F
(design for each
scrubber)7
• Ap (design) - 30
in. H207
• Water flow B 645
gpm (design per
scrubber)7
• L/G =8.5 (design
per scrubber)7
• 2 I.D. fans, 800-
hp each7
(continued)
95
-------
TABLE 5 (continued)
COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
Scrubber water
chemistry: TSS
= 9.5 ppm (avg.)j
TDS = 121.1 ppm
avg.)
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery 5 rebuilt in 1977.5
bBattery 2A and 2B combined.ij18
cBattery 3A and 3B combined.1>18
96
-------
TABLE 6. BETHLEHEM STEEL CORP./BURNS HARBOR PLANT IN CHESTERTON, IN
COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:c
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. I1*5
No. 21*5
Wilputte1
196924
1980a»25
1982b,25
82L26
20-524
Koppersl
197224
821,26
20-524
6,670 (both batteries combined)4
5,179 (both batteries combined)4
Bench mounted hood-fixed duct serves each
battery7»13
Common scrubbers serve both batteries
(Type F, venturi)24,27
AAF27
1978;24 197923,25
• Two high energy fixed-throat venturi
scrubbers are interconnected by common
duct (one serves as backup)2-*,2' ,28
• Each scrubber has a special plug type
design27
• Design Ap = 50 in. W.G. (each
scrubber)27
• I.D. fan rated at 141,000 cfm27
• Fan motors are 2,000-hp27
• Test Data (1980);24
Ap (range) = 50-55 in. W.G. (both
scrubbers)
Scrubber inlet temp. = 250-450°F
• Test Data (1979);2^
No. 1 battery—Ayg. 133,400 dscfm at
146°F avg.
1,310 gpm of scrubber water used
Ap = 52 in. W.C. (avg.)
(continued)
97
-------
TABLE 6 (continued)
COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
No. 2 battery—Avg. 137,000 dscfm at
139°F avg.
1,191 gpm of scrubber water used
Ap = 51 in. W.C. (avg.)
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
alnvolved changing steam nozzles, i.e., increasing aspiration, and rebuilding
battery top."
^Scheduled shutdown for rebuild, i.e., double collector mains to be
installed.25
cBench mounted hood-fixed duct system replaced a coke side shed in 1978.^
98
-------
TABLE 7. BETHLEHEM STEEL CORP./JOHNSTOWN PLANT IN JOHNSTOWN, PA
COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:a>b
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
COKE PRODUCTION:0
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. 1829
Koppers2»30
195129,30
198230,31
77l»30
3.5;7 42
3,500 (for three battery operation)4
3,028 (for three battery operation)4
Koppers/Rosedale, one-spot car serves
battery No. 185»7
Scrubberd»29
:y (A33)7
Rile
1978
• 350-hp fan motor; fan rated @ 40,000
acfm »
• Ap (scrubber) = 30 in. H?029,32
• Water flow = 400-425 gpm*9»32
• Scrubber water quality—TSS = 1,107 mg/1
(avg.); TDS = 245 mg/1 (avg.)29
• Test Data (1979);32
Flow = 27,000 dscfm (avg.)
Outlet temp. = 153°F (avg.)
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery No. 18 located in the Franklin Plant. Battery Nos. 17 and 19
(total—151 ovens), also in the Franklin Plant, were shut down in 1977.
^Johnstown facility also contained Battery Nos. 15 and 16 (total—88 ovens),
designated as the Rosedale Plant, shut down in 1977 due to flood.30
Production data shown for the Franklin Plant prior to shutdown of
Battery Nos. 17 and 19.4
^Scrubber water tank is normally drained, flushed and filled twice per turn;
blowdown of 150 gallons is drained after each push.32
99
-------
TABLE 8. BETHLEHEM STEEL CORP./LACKAWANNA PLANT IN LACKAWANNA, NY
COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in. ):
No. 75
Wilputte2
I9522
762,34
12-23.4 ,
No. 85
Wilputte2
I961b,2
762,34
12-234
No. 95
Wilputte2
19692
1982°, 33
762>3*
20-434
COKE PRODUCTION:d
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
8,140 (for seven battery operation)^
6,908 (for seven battery operation)^
Chemico H-II, one-spot car e
serves batteries No. 7 and 8^°
Scrubber^
Aronetics, Inc.'
1979;7 198Q33
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBatteries No. 3,4,5 and 6 were shut down in 1977.33,34
bBattery was completly rebuilt in 1980.33
cScheduled shutdown for rebuild.33
^Production data reflects operation of battery Nos. 3,4,5,6,7,8, and 9.^
eA Chemico H-II car was scheduled to be installed in Dec. 1980 on Battery
No. 9 by Consent Decree. Scrubber manufactured by Aronetics Inc.?
100
-------
TABLE 9. BETHLEHEM STEEL CORP./SPARROWS POINT PLANT IN SPARROWS POINT, MD
COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:d
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
No. I2 No. 22 No. 32
No. 42
Koppers2 Koppers2 Koppers2 Koppers2
I9602 19612 19512 19782
1985b>35 1985b>35 1982C»31 1985b>35
632 602 632 632
32 ' 32 32 32
5,500 (all eight batteries combined)36
(continued)
101
-------
TABLE 9 (continued)
COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:*"
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m):
No. 52
Koppers2
19782
I985b>35
632 ,
32
No. 62
Koppers2
19532
1982C>31
632
32
No. II2
Koppers-
Becker2
19552
652
42
No. 122
Koppers-
Becker2
19572
652
42
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:d
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
See previous page3"
Chemico H-II, one-
spot car serves
batteries No. 11 and
127,19
Scrubber19
Aronetics, Inc.?
19797»35
• High pressure hot
water ejector
evacuates gases
during push37
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery Nos. 9 and 10 were shut down in early 1981.3*>
t>New Battery "A" to start up in Dec. 1981; new Battery "B" scheduled to
start up in Dec. 1985 will replace Battery Nos. 1,2,4, and 5.36
cPlant has the option to either shut down battery Nos. 3 and 6 in 1982, or
continue their operation until 1985.3^
^Battery Nos. 1 through 6 will have push controls by the end of 1981; new
Battery "A" will have land-based push control system upon installation.'
102
-------
TABLE 10. CF&I STEEL CORP./PUEBLO PLANT IN PUEBLO, CO
COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
fll.5 cl,5
Koppers Koppers2
19725,38
13-039 ' 13-039
5 47L5
Granite City (south),
one-spot car serves
Batteries B and C5>40
Scrubber40
Ducon40
19797
• Test Data (I960);41
49,420-52,000 acfm
(range); 115°F
Dl.5
Koppers-
Becker2
I9602
13-039
Granite City (north),
one-spot car serves
Battery 0^,40
Scrubber40
Ducon40
19797
• Test Data (I960);41
47,930-51,410 acfm
(range); 145-161°F
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation, and conversion from single to double
collector mains.2
103
-------
TABLE llj FORD MOTOR CO./RIVER ROUGE PLANT IN DEARBORN, MI
COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:8
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in. ):
AL42
Koppers-
Becker2
1937b>l
451, 42
13-3M2
AxL42
Wilputtel
197242
1979d>2
13L42
13-3L42
Bl,42
Koppers-
Becker2
1937C»1
1979d»2
61L42
13-31
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:6
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
4,340 (all five batteries combined)4
3,945 (all five batteries combined)4
Bench mounted hood-fixed duct serves
batteries A, Ax and B42>43
Common high-energy scrubber system serves
all three batteries4^44
AAF44
1972f,5,43
• One I.D. fan rated at 112,000 acfm @
132°F (avg.)44
• Ap (design) = 60 in. H2044
• Design scrubber water flow = 890 gpm4"
• L/G = 7.95 (calculated-design)44.46
• Fan rated at 2,000-hp44
(continued)
104
-------
TABLE 11 (continued)
COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft~in.):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
.h
Koppers-Becker2
19398 ,1
Koppers-Becker2
19631
13-31
13-31
See previous page4
Bench mounted hood-fixed duct serves
batteries C and Dx42>43
Common high-energy scrubber system serves
both batteries43 >44
197643
• System similar to that used for
batteries "A", "Ax" and "B" (see previous
page)43,44,46
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery D pushed empty in 1972.42
^Battery rebuilt in 1964; 16 ovens have been hot and empty since 1964.1>42
cBattery rebuilt in 1962.1
^Involved end-flue rehabilitation.2
eSystem was modified in 1981 from conventional one-spot to rotary one-spot
car.57,45
^Original hood-duct installation in 1972—Battery A; extended to batteries
Ax and B in 1974 and 1976, respectively.43
SBattery rebuilt in 1963.1
^System will be modified by 1982 to be compatible with rotary one-spot
105
-------
TABLE 12. INLAND STEEL CO./INDIANA HARBOR WORKS IN E. CHICAGO, IN
COKE PLANT NO. 2
COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. 61
No. 71
No. 81
Koppers-Becker (all three batteries)!
19501 19561 19581
1971a,2 19743,2
651
12-O1
871
12-01
871
12-Ql
6,170 (all five batteries combined)4
5,640 (all five batteries combined)4
Granite City, one-spot cars serve
batteries No. 6-10b>47
Scrubber per car47
1979 (first car);47 1980 (two cars)47
• Design specifications (each scrubber);4**
Ap = 48 in. H20
Fan rpms = 1,500
100 gal of scrubber water per push
(continued)
106
-------
TABLE 12 (continued)
COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. 91
Koppers-Becker^
19591
87,1 .
12-O1
See previous page^
See previous
No.
Koppers-Beckerl
19701
511
20-01
See previous
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2
^Three cars are available to serve all five batteries (No. 6-10).
107
-------
TABLE 13. INLAND STEEL CO./INDIANA HARBOR WORKS IN E. CHICAGO, IN
COKE PLANTS NO. 3a AND 4b
COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in. ):
ci
Koppersl
19741
1979c,50
561
20-21
111
Koppersl
1978M9
691.^9
20-21
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
2,500 (battery C)4 3,014 (battery No. II)4
1,562 (battery C)4 2,740 (battery No. II)4
Shed serves
battery C5»7
Koppers, one-spot car
serves battery No.
Scrubber (Type S— Scrubber (Kinpactor)7
Klnpactor venturi)->2
AAF52
197423,50
• System uses 1,500
hp fan rated at
200,000 acfm at
150°Fd»7
• Design scrubber
water rate =
2,400 gpm7
• L/G (design-
calculated) 12:17
• Test Data
(1975);37
211,750 dscfm
(avg.)
Temp. •= 77.5°F
(avg.)
• Shed measures
360-ft long7
AAF7
197850,53
• Design flow rate =
17,000 acfm48
• Test Data (1978);54
15,179 acfm (avg.)
Temp. - 113°F (avg.)
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery No. C.
bBattery No. II.4
c 51
Involved end-flue rehabilitation.
Spare fan equal in size and capacity is available.
108
-------
TABLE 14. INTERLAKE INC./RIVERDALE PLANT IN CHICAGO, IL
COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-In. ):
No. I1
Wilputte1
1956; 19575
19793*2
502,55
12-81
No. 21
Wilputte1
19571
1979a2
502,55
12-81
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYST1M:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
1,850;! 1.7404 (both batteries
combined)
1,460 (both batteries combined)4
Minister Stein system serves each
battery5'56
Common venturi scrubber serves both
batteries5>56
Riley5»5657
197956,57
• Design flow rate = 100,000 scfm with
90% capture efficiency56
• Test Data (I960);56
104,677 dscfm (avg.) or
112,095 acfm (avg.) at 90°F (avg.)
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2
^Batteries previously controllad by Halcon car installed in 1973.
109
-------
TABLE 15. JONES & LAUGHLIN STEEL CORP./ALIQUIPPA WORKS IN ALIQUIPPA, PA
COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
COKE PRODUCTION:0
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
Koppers-Becker2
19451
197858
1061
13-01 '
Koppers1
19762>55
20-61
4,308 (both batteries combined)58
3,500 (both batteries combined)61
Shed serves battery A-55>59
Scrubber (Kinpactor
venturi)5>59
AAF5.59
197623,58
• Shed dimensions;6^
360 ft long, 54 ft wide,
73 ft to peak; extends
50 ft beyond ends of
battery
• Two I.D. fans rated at
200,000 cfm @ ambient
temp.59
• One fan normally
operated at 320,000
acfm; other fan as
standby61
• Fans driven by 2,500 hp
motors'»61
• Ap (scrubber) = 30 in.
H20 (design)59*61
• Water flow = 2,500 gpm
(design)61
• L/G = 7.8 (calculated)61
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBatteries A-3 and A-4 were shut down in 1980.
58
bBattery A-5 replaced Battery A-2 in 1975-1976.61
Production data for a four-battery operation (A-l, A-3, A-4, and A-5) =
6,946 (rated tons/day) and 4,506 (typical tons/day).^
110
-------
TABLE 16. JONES AND LAUGHLIN STEEL CORP./CAMPBELL WORKS IN CAMPBELL, OH
COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
No. 71
Wilputte1
1954^5
761
13-01
No. 91
Wilputte1
195855
761
13-01
COKE PRODUCTION^
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
4.000;1 3,8164 (for three battery
operation)
3,483 (for three battery operation)^
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery No. 8 shut down June 5, I960.62
''Production data reflects operation of battery Nos. 7, 8, and 9.
111
-------
TABLE 17. JONES & LAUGHLIN STEEL CORP./INDIANA HARBOR WORKS IN E. CHICAGO, IN
COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:8
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
COKE PRODUCTION:0
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. 41
Koppers-Becker2
19562»63
1976b»64
No. 91
Koppers-Becker2
19611,63
1979b,2
13 -O1
13-01
4.050;1 4,0004 (for three battery
operation)
3,406 (for three battery operation)
Chemico H-III,
one-spot car serves
battery No. 45>19
Scrubber19
Aronetics, Inc.''
19797,23
Chemico H-III,
one-spot car serves
battery No. 919
Scrubber19
Aronetics, Inc.7
1980764
• Test Data
(1981) ;Q5"
47,710-60,916 dscfm
(range)
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery No. 3 permanently shut down.64
blnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2>6^
cProduction data reflects operation of battery Nos. 3, 4, and
112
-------
TABLE 18. JONES & LAUGHLIN STEEL CORP./PITTSBURGH WORKS IN PITTSBURGH, PA
COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
Pll
Wilputte1
19601
197966
59l
13-01
P21
Wilputte1
19611
1977a»2
591
13-01
P3N1
Wilputte1
19611
19 8oa, 66
591
13 -O1
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
5,300 (all five batteries combined)4
5,230 (all five batteries combined)4
Minister Stein system
serves batteries PI and P267
198167
(continued)
113
-------
TABLE 18 (continued)
COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION: P3S1 P41
MANUFACTURER: Wilputte1 Koppers-Becker2
STARTUP DATE: 19611 19531
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE: 1978a»2 1977a>2
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS: 591 791
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.): 13-0* 13-01
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY: See previous page*
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:b»c
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2
bBatteries P3N and P3S scheduled for a Minister Stein system by
Jan. 1982.23»66
CA Minister Stein-baghouse control system on battery P4 will begin operation
in Dec. 1981; replaces a Chemico H-II car (installed 1978). The Chemico car
may be sent to either the Campbell Works or Indiana Harbor Works to be used as
a spare.5,l"»2.3,o7
-------
TABLE 19. KAISER STEEL CORP./FONTANA WORKS IN FONTANA, CA
COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:;1
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
Koppers-Becker^
194268
19732
451,68
13-068
Koppers-Becker^
1942^8
197368
451,68
13-068
4,250;! 4,1004 (all seven batteries
combined)
3,800 (all seven batteries combined)^
(continued)
115
-------
TABLE 19 (continued)
COKE OVEN PUSH NG PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
Koppers-Becker^
194968
!976a,68
451,68
13-068'
Koppers-Becker^
1952^8
1979-80^,68
451,68
13-068
See previous page
1,4
(continued)
116
-------
TABLE 19 (continued)
COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in. ):
El
Koppers-
Becker2
195268
1978b»2
451,68'
13-068
Fl
Koppers-
Becker2
195868
13-068
Gl
Koppers-
Becker2
195868
451,68
13-068
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:0
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
See previous pagesl»^
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aInvolved trimwork.68
blnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2*68
CA purchase order was submitted in March 1979 for the installation of a
"Minister Stein" system to control Batteries "F and G." Construction started,
but was terminated at an early stage.69
117
-------
TABLE 20. LONE STAR STEEL IN LONE STAR, TX
COKE OVEN PUSHCNG PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-In.):
COKE PRODUCTION:15
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:0
C2
Koppers^
19795
702,70
57,70
1.2144
690*
Koppers/Lone Star, one-spot carj
Scrubber^
Hydrosonics®/Lone Star5»70
19797,70
• Designed to control -45,000 scfm
(52,500 acfm @ 272°F)7,/0
• 360 gal scrubber water required per
push'0
• L/G = 6.85 (calculated—based on
52,500 acfm)7,70
• Test Data (1979);70
Avg. inlet flow = 66,000 scf per push
• Test Data (1979):72
43,900-44,100 scfm
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBatteries A & B (total—78 ovens) were shut down in 1979.71
^Production data appears to bo for the old batteries.4
cDirty water cleaned every th .rd push and sent to quench tower sump.7°
118
-------
TABLE 21. NATIONAL STEEL CORP./GREAT LAKES STEEL DIVISION IN ECORSE, MI
COKE PLANT NO. 2
COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
COKE PRODUCTION:b
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. 3l
Wilputte1'73
19542,73
1982b»51
?oi
13-21
No. 41
Wilputte1.73
19562,73
1974a,74
781
13-21
2,500 (both batteries combined)4
2,500 (both batteries combined)4
Modified Mitsubishi bench mounted hood-
fixed duct serves batteries No. 3 and 4.7,73
Common scrubber system serves both
batteries73
ARCO7
1973 (upgraded—1974)c>73
• System consists of three scrubbers and
three fans operated in parallel3
• Each I.D. fan has 500 hp motor; each
rated at 75,000 acfm @ 150°F7»73
• Test Data (Battery No. 3—1973);7
Flow rate = 135,000 scfm (wet)
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.74
^Scheduled shutdown for rebuild, with startup in 1985.^1
cTwo scrubber fans installed 1973, additional scrubber fan installed 1974.73
119
-------
TABLE 22. NATIONAL STEEL CORP./GREAT LAKES STEEL DIVISION IN ECORSE, MI
COKE PLANT NO. 3
COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
No. 51
Otto1>73
19701.2
85*
20-51
3.412;73 2,900* (battery No. 5)
2,700 (battery No. 5)4
Modified Mitsubishi bench mounted hood-
fixed duct serves battery No. 573
Scrubber73
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
197873
• System uses one scrubber and one
fan with an additional scrubber on
standby73
• Scrubbers are fixed throat Venturis
rated at 306.000 acfm at 80°F
(saturated)73
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
120
-------
TABLE 23. NATIONAL STEEL CORP./GRANITE CITY STEEL DIVISION IN GRAINTE CITY, IL
COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATIONS
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
Ab,75
McKee-Otto75
198075
4575
14-075
760-85375
Granite City, one-spot car serves
battery A76
High-energy venturi scrubber7**
Ducon23»76
1977C«7
• Design flow rate = 50,000 acfm at
165°F (saturated)7
• Ap (design) = 40 in. H2077
• Test Data (1980—No. 2 car);76
67,020-72,510 acfm (range)
101-113°F (range)
Ap = 33-37 in. H20
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aPlant formerly operated batt iries B and C which contained 49 and 61 ovens,
respectively. These batteriis are currently being rebuilt similar to battery
"A" and will contain 45 and +7 ovens, respectively.7-'
^This battery replaced a simi Lar type Koppers-Becker battery containing 27
ovens.
75
cGranite City car was previou sly used on batteries B and C for pushing
control. Battery A was uncontrolled prior to 1980.7>7^
121
-------
TABLE 24. NATIONAL STIEL CORP./WEIRTON STEEL DIVISION IN WEIRTON, WV
COKE OVEN PUSI'ING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in. ):
M-7l
Koppers-Becker^
19511
198279
13-21
M-81
Koppers-Becker^
195378
1979b,79
13-21
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
4,600 (for four battery operation)0>^
4,066 (for four battery operation)0^
Two-Step Quench (TSQ)78»80
"Modified" PECT/Donner
Hanna hood with two
ejector scrubbers7**,80
PECT/Donner Hanna and
National Steel78
198078,80
• Original PECT/Donner
Hanna Fog Spray
System (1979) was
modified in 1980
to include two cold
water ejector
scrubbers8^
• Each scrubber is
designed for 4,600
scfm80
(continued)
122
-------
TABLE 24 (continued)
COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:8
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTiM:*
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
I-ll
Koppersl
19731*5
1979d«2
871.5
20-478
3,600 (battery I-l)4
3,000 (battery 1-
Koppers/Weirton, one-spot car serves
battery I-15>7
High energy, variable throat venturi
scrubber'
AAF7
19737,78
• Gases pass through scrubber, flooded
elbow, cyclonic separator fan, and stack'
• Design flow rate = 37,500 acfm @
170°F (scrubber outlet)7'81
• Design flow rate = 36,110 acfm @
700°F (inlet)81
• Water flow = 300 ggm (design)7 >81
• L/G = 8 (design)7»81
• Ap = 50 in. W.C. (design)7
• Ap = 35 in. W.C. (max. during push)7
• Ap < 10 in. W.C. (travel)7
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBatteries M-5 and M-6 (total of 106 ovens) were shut down in Sept.-Oct. 1980 '
Involved end-wall rehabilitation
cProduction data for the "mainland" reflects a four battery operation
(M-5, M-6, M-7, and M-8) ' y
j *y
Involved end-flue rehabilitation
eSystem is no longer in operation due to quencher problems and scrubber
deterioration-separator explosion.7»78
123
-------
TABLE 25. REPUBLIC STEEL CORP./SOUTHERN STEEL DISTRICT, THOMAS WORKS
IN BIRMINGHAM, AL
COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION: No. I1
MANUFACTURER: Koppers1
STARTUP DATE: 19413*1
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE: 1981b>82
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS: 651
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.): 13-01
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY: 1,066;4 9501
TYPICAL TONS/DAY: 5604
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:0
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery was rebuilt In 1969.2
^Involved end-flue rehabilitiation.82
cPlant employs "bubble concept" for emissions control.5,82
124
-------
TABLE 26. REPUBLIC STEEL CORP./CHICAGO DISTRICT IN CHICAGO, IL
COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:b
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:b
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. I1
Wilputte83
1943^,7
1981a>7>83
751.5
13 -Ql
1.369:4 1,20083
1,3004
Shed serves battery No. I5,83
Wet ESP5>I5
Mikropul5
197723
• System consists of two ESPs operated
in parallel, then two I.D. fans and
one stack'»°4
• Design flow rate = 210,000 acfm (total
system)5'84
• Each fan uses 535 hp motor'
• Two fields per ESP; 28 gas passages^jl5
• Collection area = 25,200 sq ft (total)i5
• A secondary hood covering the quench
car tracks between the battery and
quench tower is exhausted by an
auxiliary fan (35 hp) into the main
shed flow system'
• Test Data (1977);84
Inlet—193,866 acfm @ 75°F
Outlet—182,294 acfm @ 39°F
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery No. 1 will be replaced (late 1981) by Battery No. 2 containing 60,
6 m ovens, double collector mains, 4 charge holes, automatic lid lifters,
using stage charging and rated at 1,800 tons of coke per day.83
bNew battery will use a Mitsubishi bench-mounted hood-fixed duct system,
and the existing ESP for pushing emission control.7,83
125
-------
TABLE 27. REPUBLIC STEEL CORP./CLEVELAND DISTRICT IN CLEVELAND, OH
COKE PLANT NO. 1
COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION: a
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:b
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in. ):
No. I1
Koppersl
19765
5ll
13-21
No. 21
Koppers^
19582
19722
5ll
13-21
No. 31
Koppersl
19582
19722
511
13 -21
No. 41
Koppersl
19582
19722
511
13-21
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:0
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
2,782 (all four batteries combined)^
2,049 (all four batteries combined)^
Koppers/Rosedale, one-spot cars (two
cars—Nos. 11 and 12 serve all four
batteries)23*86
Venturi-Rod Scrubber (on each car)8?
Riley7
1978/
• Each scrubber uses fan rated at 30,000
• Test Data (1979—No. 11 car);86
Avg. Ap = 34.8 in. ^0
Avg. inlet flow rate « 39,930 acfm at
528 °F
Avg. outlet flow rate = 28,500 acfm at
99°F
• Test Data (1979-No. 12 car);
Avg. outlet flow rate = 28,700 acfm at
128°F
Avg. Ap = 29.3 in. H20
Scrubber water flow rate = 125-150 gpm
L/G (calculated) = 4.4-5.2
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery No. 5 was shut down in 1975.85
^Included end-flue rehabilitation.2
CA spare Koppers-Rosedale car is available for batteries No. 1-4.88
126
-------
TABLE 28. REPUBLIC STEEL CORP./CLEVELAND DISTRICT IN CLEVELAND, OH
COKE PLANT NO. 2
COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:b
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:0
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. 61
Koppers-Becker^
195255
19792
13-21
No. 71
Koppers-Beckerl
1952^5
19 79 2
631
13-21
1,954 (both batteries combined)^
1,286 (both batteries combined)4
Chemico H-III, one-spot cars (two
cars—Nos. 21 and 22 serve both
batteries).7»19
Scrubber (on each car)19
Aronetics, Inc.'
19807,85
• Test Data (1981—-No. 21 car);89
Flow rate (range) = 88,122-96,043
acfm
Temp, (range) = 119-137°F
• Test Data (1981—No. 22 car);89
Flow rate (range) = 97,483-100,414
acfm
Temp, (range) = 120-149°F
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery No. 5 was shut down in 1975.85
blncluded end-flue rehabilitation.2
C0ne Chemico H-III car serves as spare for batteries No. 6 and
127
-------
TABLE 29. REPUBLIC STEEL CORP./SOUTHERN DISTRICT, GULFSTEEL WORKS
IN GADSDEN, AL
COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
No. 2l»5
Wilputte90
194290
1973*, 2
651.90
42,90
Ho. 31*5
Wilputte90
196090
65L90
42,90
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY: 2,372;4 l,40Ql (both batteries combined)
TYPICAL TONS/DAY: 1,785 (both batteries combined)4
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:b
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2
%o controls used—"bubble concept" employed for emissions control.5
128
-------
TABLE 30. REPUBLIC STEEL CORP./CENTRAL ALLOY DISTRICT IN MASSILLON, OH
COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION: No. I1
MANUFACTURER: Koppers1
STARTUP DATE: 19551
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE: 198231
NO. OF OVENS: . 311
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.): 13-21
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY: 576:4 5001
TYPICAL TONS/DAY: 500*
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
129
-------
TABLE 31. REPUBLIC STEEL CORP./MAHONING VALLEY DISTRICT IN WARREN, OH
COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:a
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:b
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. 41
Koppers91
19792
85
13-0
1.8524
1,2794
Chemico H-III, one-spot car
serves battery No. 419
Scrubber19
Aronetics, Inc.7
19795>7
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBatteries No. 1 and 2 were shut down in March 1979.62
^A spare Chemico H-III car is available.19
130
-------
TABLE 32. REPUBLIC STEEL CORP./MAHONING VALLEY DISTRICT IN YOUNGSTOWN, OH
COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in. ):
Al
Koppersl
19501.92
1982b>5
13-21
381
Bl
Koppersl
1950L92
1982b»5
13-21
651
ci
Koppersl
1950a,l
13-21
591
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
2,970;4 2,46Ql (all three batteries
combined)
2,735 (all three batteries combined)4
Chemico H-III, one-spot car
serves batteries B and
Scrubber?
Aronetics, Inc.'
I96062 > 92
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
^Battery rebuilt in 1962.2
^Scheduled shutdown by Federal Consent Decree.5»62
131
-------
TABLE 33. UNITED STATES STEEL CORP./CLAIRTON WORKS IN CLAIRTON, PA
COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in. ):
No. 193
Wilputte2
195593
1979^3
6493
13-093
No. 293
Wilputte2
195593
197993
6493
13-093
No. 393
Wilputte2
195593
197993
6493
13-093
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
20,780 (entire coke plant)4
16,342 (entire coke plant)4
Chemico H-III, one-spot car serves batteries
No. 1, 2 and 366»93
Scrubber19.93
Aronetics, Inc.'
198166,93
(continued)
132
-------
TABLE 33 (continued)
COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
No. 793
Koppers2
195494
198431
6497
42
No. 893
Koppers^
195495
198431
6497
42
No. 993
Koppers2
195496
198431
6497
42
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY: ;
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
See previous
Chemico H-III, one-spot car serves batteries
No. 7, 8, and 966»93
Scrubber19»93
Aronetics, Inc.7
198166>93
(continued)
133
-------
TABLE 33 (continued)
COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:b
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. 1593
Koppers^
1953a>2
6193
42
See previous pages^
Chemico H-III, one-spot car
serves battery No. 15^|93
Scrubber19'93
Aronetics, Inc.'
19795>66
(continued)
134
-------
TABLE 33 (continued)
COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. 1693
Wilputte2
195098
19 8231
6193
42
No. 1793
Wilputte2
195099
198231
6193
42
See previous pages^
Shed serves battery No. 175»93
Scrubber (Type S Kinpactor)93*97
AAF5.97
19755»7
• 256 ft long shed extending 15 ft over
ends of battery97
• Designed to exhaust 216,000 acfm via 2
parallel, 800-hp fans5'9?
• Temp. = 91°F (design-outlet)9?
• Ap = 25 in. H20 (design)5
• Water flow = 2,000 gpm; Ap (scrubber) =
23 in. H20
• L/G = 9 (design)5
(continued)
135
-------
TABLE 33 (continued)
COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. 19^3 No. 2093 NO. 2193 No. 22*5
Koppers-Becker (all four batteries)2
195ll°0 1947C.101 1947102 1946103
197793 1972d,31
8793 8793
52 . 52
8793
52
8793
52
See previous
Chemico H-III,
one-spot car serves
batteries No. 19
and 20f>!9,93
Scrubber19»93
Aronetics, Inc.?
19795,93
Chemico H-III,
one-spot car serves
batteries No. 21
and 2219,93
Scrubberl9,93
Aronetics, Inc.?
197966,93
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery No. 15 rebuilt in 1979.2
bSpare Chemico H-III car available for battery No. 1519
cBattery No. 20 was rebuilt in 1978.93
dlnvolved end-flue rehabilitiation.31
eRebuilt from bench up.93
f Batteries No. 19 and 20 were previously controlled by Chemico H-II, one-
spot car which is currently used as spare for these two batteries.19,93
136
-------
TABLE 34. UNITED STATES STEEL CORP./FAIRFIELD WORKS IN FAIRFIELD, AL
COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:a
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. 2104
U.S. Steel/Still2
1978l°4
57104
6104
No. 9104
Koppers-Becker2
195855
1974M05
63104
45
6,866 (appears to be for five battery
operation, i.e., Nos. 2, 5, 6, 7,
and 9)4,82
5,930 (appears to be for five battery
operation, i.e., Nos. 2, 5, 6, 7,
and 9)4,82
U.S. Steel one-spot
car serves battery
No. 25,104
Mitsubishi bench-
mounted hood-fixed
duct system serves
battery No. 95,7,1°4
Venturi scrubberl°4 Baghouse5»7»104
Ducon"
197882
• Exhaust flow rate
47,000 cfml°4
• Ap (design) = 24
in. W.G.1°6
• 350 gal of water
used per pusb.106
• Test Data (1979);106
44,000 dscfm @ 123°F
(avg.)
Ap = 23.5-26.6 in.
H20 (range)
Wheelabrator-Frye82
197982
• Baghouse capacity
= 100,000 scfm82
• A/C (design) =
3:182
• Polyester bags82
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 were shut down in 1977, 1977, 1980, 1980,
1979, and 1978, respectively.82,104
bBattery No. 9 was rebuilt in 1979.104
cBattery No. 9 has been idling hot since Aug. 1980.82
137
-------
TABLE 35. UNITED STATES STEEL CORP./FAIRLESS WORKS IN FAIRLESS HILLS, PA
COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in. ):
No. I1
Wilputte1
I9522
1978a>2
8?1
13-61
No. 21
Wilputte1
19532
1978a»2
871
13-61
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY: 3,000 (both batteries combined)4
TYPICAL TONS/DAY: 3,000 (both batteries combined)4
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM :b
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2
per battery, ducted to common baghouse (manufacturer-Mikropul)
ordered. Baghouse designed for 300,000 to 400,000 acfm.3
138
-------
TABLE 36. UNITED STATES STEEL CORP./GARY WORKS IN GARY, IN
COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
No. I5
Koppers-
Becker2
1979b»2
852,108
65,107
No. 25 No. 35
U.S. Steel/ U.S. Steel/
Still2 Still2
19752,107 19762»1°7
575 575
65,107 65,107
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
11,960 (all eight batteries combined)4
9,750 (all eight batteries combined)4
U.S. Steel, one-spot U.S. Steel, one-spot
louvered car serves louvered cars serve
battery No. I7 batteries No. 2
and 357,107
Scrubber7 >1°7
Ducon:64 Air
1979;1°9 19807
• Variable throat
scrubber 10 7
• Design flow rate
= 40,100 scfm64
• Ap = 32 in.
W.C.64
• Design L/G
= 1Q107
Scrubber per car7,107
Ducon7»l°7
1977;7 1978-19795
• Variable throat;1°7
fixed throat
scrubbers7
• Design specifics (each
scrubber );/,-LUt>
Flow rate = 75,000
acfm at 160°F
Scrubber water rate =
700 gpm
L/G -' 9.3
Ap « 24 in. H20
• Test Data (1980) ;
No. 2 car - 57,964
dscfm at 96°F
No. 3 car = 65,409
acfm at 126°F
(continued)
139
-------
TABLE 36 (continued)
COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
No. 55
Wilputte2
19542,107
198831
7755,107
32,107
No. 75
Wilputte2
1954107
1978b>2
198831
7755,107
32,107
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
See previous pages^
Mitsubishi bench mounted hood-fixed duct
system serves each battery64,107
Common baghouse serves both batteries^
Wheelabrator-Frye6^
1980109
• Design flow rate = 138,000 acfm @ 275°F
(continued)
140
-------
TABLE 36 (continued)
COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:41
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:c
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:0
No. 135
Koppers-
Becker2
19512 .107
1974b»2
198731
7755
32,107
No. 155
Wilputte2
19512,107
1977b>2
7755,101
32,107
No. 165
Wilputte2
!9492,107
1975b»2
198731
7755
32,107
See previous pages^
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBatteries No. 9 and 11 pushed empty in 1971, Batteries No. 10, 12, and 14
pushed empty in 1974.1°'
^Involved end-flue rehabilitation.2
cBatteries No. 13, 15, and 16 were scheduled to incorporate a similar,
Mitsubishi bench mounted hood-fixed duct system as on batteries No. 5 and 7
by September I960.109
141
-------
TABLE 37. UNITED STATES STEEL CORP./LORAIN—CUYAHOGA WORKS IN LORAIN, OH
COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
ATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:a
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:b
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
D*
Koppers-
Becker2
19572
198211!
595 -
32
C5
Kopper-
Becker2
19562
19772
595
32
r«acm xcv-v-c-.w--!
1|5
Koppers-
Becker2
19552
19782
595
32
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:0
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:0
4,468 (all seven batteries combined)^
4,319 (all seven batteries combined)^
(continued)
142
-------
TABLE 37 (continued)
COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:a
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:b
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:0
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:c
K5
Wilputte2 Wilputte2 Wilputte2 Wilputte2
19552 19472 19472 19472
19792 19702 19702 19702
1982111
595
595
32
595
32
32
See previous
1982111
595
32
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
alncluded end-flue rehabilitation.2
^Batteries D, K and L are scheduled to be shut down in 1982; stretch out
applied for until 1985.51
CA11 batteries to be equipped with sheds ducted to baghouse by 1982.5,7,111
143
-------
TABLE 38. UNITED STATES STEEL CORP./GENEVA WORKS IN PROVO, UT
COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-In.):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:b
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:b
No. I1 No. 21
No. 31
No. 41
Koppers;2 Koppers-Becker112 (all four
batteries)
1944;2 19501 (all four batteries)
1979a>2 1979a>2
63 (each, all four batteries)1'5'112
13-0;112 13-65 (each, all four
batteries)
5.000;1 3,5584 (all four batteries
combined)
3,520 (all four batteries combined)^
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation,2
bSheds per battery are currently being installed; both batteries No. 1 and 2
will be ducted to a common baghouse, as will both batteries No. 3 and 4.
-I -1 q
Each baghouse will have the following specifications:-1-1-3
Manufacturer—Micropul
Flow rate—400,000 cfm
10 modules, each with fan rated at 40,000 cfm, 17 in. W.G., and 156 BHP
A/C - 7:1
Negative pressure, with pulse-jet cleaning
144
-------
TABLE 39. WHEELING-PITTSBURGH STEEL CORP./MON VALLEY PLANT IN MONESSEN, PA
COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-Iri.):
COKE PRODUCTION:d
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. I1
Koppers-Becker^
No. 21
Koppers-Becker^
37c,ll4
13 -Ql
13-Ql
13-Ql
1,836 (both batteries combined)4
1,336 (both batteries combined)4
Minister Stein system serves each
battery2^'58'1-14
Common baghouse serves both
batteries23,58,114
Wheelabrator-Frye114
I960114
• Baghouse specifications;23*58
120,000 acfm @ 275°F
A/C = 5.3:1
4 compartments with polyester bags
Pulse-jet cleaning
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery No. 1 was rebuilt in 1981.114
^Battery No. 2 was rebuilt in 1979, which included conversion from a 3-hole,
single collector main to a 4-hole, double collector main battery.2,114
cBattery No. 1 originally had 74 ovens; 37 ovens were rebuilt in 1981.which
included conversion from a 3-hole, single collector main to a 4-hole double
collector main battery. The remaining 37 ovens are being converted to a
4-hole, double collector main battery.H-4
^Production data reflects the original two battery (93 oven) operation.4
145
-------
TABLE 40. WHEELING-PITTSBURGH STEEL CORP./STEUBENVILLE PLANT
IN EAST STEUBENVILLE, WV
COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATIONS
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
No. I5
Koppers2
1917b,115
1978e»2
472
32,115
No. 25
Koppers2
1917C.115
19786,2
472
32,115
No. 35
Koppers-Becker2
1917d,115
1978e, 2
512
32,115
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:f
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
4,400;1 5,2054 (all four batteries
combined)
4,310 (all four batteries)4
(continued)
146
-------
COKE OVEK PUSHING PROCESS AND
BATTERY DESIGNATION:a
MISSION CONTROL DATA
Hi,. »«•
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO* OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
197655,115
795
65,115
See previous page
Bench-mounted hood-fixed duct
serves battery No. 85.7.23
Scrubber7.23,115
AAF5,23,115
19767,23,115
• Design flow rate = 146,500 acfm
@ 400°F
• Design Ip = 33 in. H207
• 1 fans—total hp = 1,600?
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aPlant shut down Battery No. 4 (53 ovens) in 1977, Battery No. 5 (53 ovens)
In 1976, and Battery No. 6 (63 ovens) in 1977.H5
h«dttery No. 1 rebuilt U\ 195S-*115
cBattery No. 2 rebuilt in 1953.2,115
dBattery No. 3 rebuilt in 1964.2>115
elnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2
^Sheds ducted to a common baghouse for Battery Nos. 1, 2, and 3 by Federal
Consent Decree, committed for 1982. Baghouse specifications: 14 modules,
each with a 100 hp F.D. fan; system will handle 300,000 acfm @ 125°F.79»115
147
-------
MATERIAL IN THIS SECTION SUBJECT TO CONFIDENTIALITY
REVIEW AND IS NOT RELEASABLE AS OF FEBRUARY 1, 1982.
FOR INFORMATION, CONTACT L. KESARI, U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY, DIVISION OF STATIONARY SOURCE ENFORCEMENT.
o
O
O
O
-------
TABLE 1. ALABAMA BYPRODUCTS CORP./TARRANT COKE PLANT IN TARRANT, AL
COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:a
No. 52
No. 62
No. I82;A2
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE: 198082
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS: 252
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-ln.): 13-682
Koppers-Becker82 Koppers-Becker82 Wilputte82
19412,82 194i82 19682»82
198082 197982
292
13-682
782,82
16-082
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
2,400 (for a four battery operation)^
2,100 (for a four battery operation)^
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM :
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:0
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery No. 2 was permanently shut down in August 1979.82
bFoundation pads laid (1981) for the "Hawley Trav-L-Vent" system which will
control battery Nos. 1, 5, and 6.82
cControl system for battery Nos. 1 and 6 will use a Buell baghouse for gas
cleaning; A/C - 6.46:1 (based on 130,000 acfm flow rate, 4 compartments with
polyester, needled felt bags.82
148
-------
TABLE 2. ALLIED CHEMICAL CORP./ASHLAND PLANT IN ASHLAND, KY
COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
No. 32
Wilputte2
19532
1973C»2
762
4.52
No. 4a>2
Wilputte2
b
702
4.52. 5116
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:d
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
.d
3,480 (both batteries combined)4
2,100 (both batteries combined4
Minister Stein System (serves each
battery)2'116
Common high energy venturi scrubber116
Ducon?»16
1978 (battery No. 4)116»117
1980 (battery No. 3)118
• Design flow = 100,000 scfm
• Scrubber water flow = 1,300 gpm
(observed) 26 Oct. 9 pm (max.)116
• Ap (scrubber) = 48 in. H20
(design)116
• 2,000 hp motor for fan116
• Test Data (1978);e»116
Inlet - 128,631-146,137 acfm
Outlet - 126,343-153,563 acfm
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery No. 4 was shut down in December 1980 due to low coke demand.118
bBattery No. 4 was rebuilt in 1978.2
clnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2
^Minister Stein-scrubber system designed for one battery pushing at a
time.118
eTesting in 1978 included 4 runs during foundry coke production, and 4 runs
during furnace coke production.116
149
-------
TABLE 3. CARONDELET COKEa IN ST. LOUIS, MO
COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION: A119 B2 C119
MANUFACTURER: Wilputte119 Simon-Carves2 Koppers119
STARTUP DATE: 1913119 1913119 1952119
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE: 1967119 1975119 1974119
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS: 35119 18119 40119
OVEN HEIGHT (m): 32 32 32
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY: 1,000 (all three batteries combined)4
TYPICAL TONS/DAY: 800 (all three batteries combined)4
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM: Shed (serves all three batteries)119
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM: Common baghouse119.120
MANUFACTURER: AAF120
DATE INSTALLED: 1980119>120
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION: • Design flow rate - 300,000 cfm51»120
• A/C - 2.74:1 (design):51
• A/C = 3.04:1 (actual)120
• 2,160 bags total with a cloth area of
109,640 sq. ft.51
• 10 comparments with 1 compartment down at
all times for reverse air cleaning.51
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aPlant was previously owned by Great Lakes Carbon Corp. prior to January
1981.
150
-------
TABLE 4. CHATTANOOGA COKE & CHEMICAL CORP. IN CHATTANOOGA, TN
COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURERS
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
No. I2
Semet/Solvay121
19182
I960121
24;2 255
42
No. 22
Wllputte121
19412
1979a>2
202
42
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
576 (both batteries combined)121
Hawley Trav-L-Vent system (serves each
battery)122
Common baghouse122
Wheelabrator-Frye121
1980122
• Test Data (I960);121
Avg flow rate - 130,000 acfm at 103°F
Ayg flow rate - 119,000 dscfm
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation2
151
-------
TABLE 5. CITIZENS GAS AND COKE UTILITY IN INDIANAPOLIS, IN
COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:8
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (in):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
E2
Wilputte2*123
19462
472
42
Koppers2
19412
41123
42
1,086 (E and H batteries combined)4
1,002 (E and H batteries combined)4
Hawley Trav-L-Vent system (serves each
battery)7
Common baghouse-'»124
Mikropul Corp.7»123
19797,124
• Design gas flow = 100,000 acfm at
70°F;7 at 130°Fl23
• Design A/C = 6.24:17>123
• Felted Nomex bags7
• Pulse type cleaning7
(continued)
152
-------
TABLE 5 (continued)
COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
12,123
Dravo-Still125
19792
19792
722
52,125
1,645124
Hawley Trav-L-Vent systeml23
Mikropul123
1980123
• Rated at 149,000 acfm at 425°Fl23»l24
• Design A/C = 5.4:ll23
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBatteries F and G, both 40 oven Wilputte batteries started up in 1926 and
1929, respectively, were shut down in 1979.I23
153
-------
TABLE 6. DETROIT COKE CO. IN DETROIT, MI
COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:b
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. 62
Semet/Solvay2
19682,126
I978a»2
702,126
16-8126
2, ISO4
2,000*
Minister Stein system7
AAF127
19797
• 168,000 cfm (during push)127
• AMERtherm synthetic fabric
filtersl27
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2
Manager indicated that Minister Stein system is currently not in use
since operating costs equal coke value. 128
154
-------
TABLE 7. DONNER-HANNA COKE CORP. IN BUFFALO, NY
COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
AB2
Koppers2
19 512
512
42
No. 32
Koppers2
19642
502
42
No. 42
Koppers2
19672
502
42
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:3
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
3,004 (all three batteries combined)4
3,004 (all three batteries combined)4
PECT Donner-Hanna spray system (serves
battery AB)33
Water sprays33
PECT/Donner-Hanna3 3
197633
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aNo push controls for battery Nos. 3 or 4.33
155
-------
TABLE 8. EMPIRE COKE CO. IN HOLT, AL
COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:b»c
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
No. 1
12
Semet/Solvay90
1906a»90
202,90
32
No. 22
Semet/Solvay90
402,90
32
360 (both batteries combined)*
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery was rebuilt in 1978.2
^No controls necessary; plant located in attainment area.90
°Minister Stein system being considered.5
156
-------
TABLE 9. MERCIER CORP./ERIE COKE AND CHEMICALS IN PAINESVILLE, OH
COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. I2
Koppers-Becker2
232
42 , ,
No. 22
Koppers-Becker2
1926*.129
232
42
450 (both batteries combined)4
400 (both batteries combined)4
Shed (serves both batteries)m
Common b aghouse-*
Senaca — Environmental
1980H1,129
• Rated flow rate - 150,000 cfm130
• 6 compartment sm» l-^O
• Negative pressure design using 60 hp
fan13*
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery was rebuilt in 1972.'
157
-------
TABLE 10. INDIANA GAS AND CHEMICAL CORP. IN TERRE HAUTE, IN
COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m):
No. I2
19192
1978a»2
302
42
No. 22
19262
1978a»2
302
42
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2
400 (both batteries combined)4
340 (both batteries combined)4
Hawley Trav-L-Vent system (serves each
battery)7*132
Common venturi scrubber^-33
Riley Engineering133
1975134
• Design flow rate =• 100,000 cfm132
• Test Data (1979):i133
99,800 acfm
Ap = 19 in. H20
158
-------
TABLE 11. IRONTON COKE CORP./A SUBSIDIARY OF MCLOUTH STEEL CORP.
IN IRONTON, OH
COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:6
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. lb>2
Semet/Solvayl35
19172,135
1947d,135
68135
11-11135
No. 2C>2
Wilputtel35
1954135
19786,135
24135
12-2135
2,650 (for a three-battery operation)^
2,223 (for a three-battery operation)^
Mitsubishi bench-mounted hood-fixed
duct (serves each battery)136
Common baghousel3'
Mikropull38
19797,139
• Exhaust flow rate = 160,000 acfm at
260°F (max.)138,139
• Six compartments—negative pressure—
2,160 Dacron bags (total)139
• A/C = 5.24:1 (6 compartments on
line)139
• Pulse jet cleaning!39
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery No. 3 (76 oven-Wilputte) presently shut down.51
^Battery No. 1 operating on a 48-hour coke time to keep ovens hot.51
cBattery No. 2 was shut down between Jan. 1980 and Feb. 1981. Presently the
battery is on hot idle.^1,135
dInvolved the addition of ovens.135
elnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2,135
159
-------
TABLE 12. JIM WALTER RESOURCE, INC./COKE, IRON AND CHEMICALS DIVISION
IN BIRMINGHAM, AL
COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION: a
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in. ):
No. 32
Koppers2
19522
1979b,82
302
14-082
No. 4 2
Koppers2
19562
1981b,82
302
14-082
No. 52
Koppers2
19592
198ib,82
602
14-082
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:c
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
2,760 (for a five battery operation)4
2,400 (for a five battery operation)4
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery Nos. 1 and 2 were shut down in Aug. 1980.82
^Involved standpipe replacement and topside work.82
cHawley Trav-L-Vent system scheduled for installation on Battery Nos. 3, 4,
and 5 in 1982 (consent decree).90*140
160
-------
TABLE 13. KOPPERS CO., INC./INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS DIVISION, ERIE PLANT
IN ERIE, PA
COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATIONS
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in. ):
A2
Koppers2
1943b,141
12-Q141
23 2
B2
Koppers2
1943b>2
12-Q141
352
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
730;1 6254 (both batteries combined)
600 (both batteries combined)*
Koppers-Erikar (serves both
batteries)^*7
Scrubber7
AAF142.143
19777,143
• Design flow = 54,000 acfm at 700°F7»143
• Water flow = 300 gpml43
• Ap (operating) = 25 in. ^O7
• L/G = 5.6 (design-calcuated)143
• Curtains completely cover quench car
during travel7
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aFacility previously owned and operated by Interlake, Inc.l
bBattery was rebuilt in 1971.2
161
-------
TABLE 14. KOPPERS CO. INC./INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS DIVISION,
TOLEDO PLANT IN TOLEDO, OH
COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
C2,144
Wilputte2
19532,144
4144
8144
7024
Koppers-one-spot car'»
Scrubber145,l46
Riley Engineering146
1980144,145
• Test Data (I960);147
Flow rate (range) - 54,216-
56,384 acfm
Temperature (range) »
138-145°F
Ap (avg. range) » 18.9-22.5
in H20
Scrubber water flow rate
(range) - 700-750 gpm
L/G (@ 56,384 acfm and 750
gpm) =13.3
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery C was on hot idle from Sept. 1980 to Aug. 1981.145
162
-------
TABLE 15. KOPPERS CO., INC./INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS DIVISION,
WOODWARD PLANT IN WOODWARD, AL
COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in. ):
No. I2
Koppers2
197782
602
4m;2 3m148
No. 4A & 4Bb
Koppers2
194982
1981^,82
582
14-082
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
2,047 (all five batteries combined)^
1,272 (all five batteries combined)^
Koppers one-spot car (serves each
battery)82,148
High energy venturi scrubber-^S
197982,140
• Design flow (inlet) = 24,700 scfm148
• Design flow (outlet) = 29,500 scfrn1*8
• Ap = 20 in. H20 (design)3
• Test Data (1980) ;148
Avg. flow = 24,850 scfm
Avg. Ap = 27.8 in. H20
c.*} t 3\.
\148
(continued)
163
-------
TABLE 15 (continued)
COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
No. 2A2
Koppers2
197782
4C-148
4; 2 3148
No. 2B2
Koppers2
193782
1978C>82
38148
4;2 3148
No. 5b»2
Koppers2
195282
1978C»82
302
14-0 ft82
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
See previous page
Koppers-one-spot car (serves each
battery)82
High energy venturi scrubber82
198082,148
• Design flow rate = 29,500 scfm at
Ap = 20 in. H2ol48
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery No. 3 was permanently shut down in Nov. 1974.82
^Battery Nos. 4A, 4B, and 5 were idling hot for a 14-month period (May 1980-
July 1981) and were recharged in July 1981 .€2
clnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.82
164
-------
TABLE 16. MILWAUKEE SOLVEY COKE CO./PICKAND MATHER AND CO. IN MILWAUKEE, WI
COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. 32
No. 42
402
32,
602
32
800 (both batteries combined)4
725 (both batteries combined)4
Mitsubishi bench-mounted hood-fixed
duct (serves each battery)'
Scrubber149
1979149
• Ap - 11 in. HgO5
• Low L/G ratio-*
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery was rebuilt in 1974.2
165
-------
TABLE 17. PHILADELPHIA COKE CO., INC. IN PHILADELPHIA, PA
COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
A/B2
Koppers-Becker^O
19292
742
42
9404
8804
Hawley Trav-L-Vent
» 151
Baghouse150*151
Envirotech150*151
1980150,151
• Design flow - 100,000
scfm151
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
166
-------
TABLE 18. TONAWANDA COKE CORP. IN TONAWANDA, NY
COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3 No.
MANUFACTURER: Wilputte2
STARTUP DATE: 19622
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS: 602
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.): 12-234
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY: 1,790A
TYPICAL TONS/DAY: 9004
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery No. 1 was shut down In June 1972.34
167
-------
MATERIAL IN THIS SECTION SUBJECT TO CONFIDENTIALITY
REVIEW AND IS NOT RELEASABLE AS OF FEBRUARY 1, 1982.
FOR INFORMATION, CONTACT L. KESARI, U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY, DIVISION OF STATIONARY SOURCE ENFORCEMENT.
o
o
O Hrj
-------
REFERENCES
COKE OVEN PUSHING CONTROLS
1. World Steel Industry Data Handbook: Vol. I. The United States.
McGraw-Hill Magazine. 1978. pp. 20-25. (Reliability No. 4.)
2. Technical Approach for a Coke Production Cost Model. PEDCo
Environmental, Inc., EPA Contract No. 68-02-3071, pp. 39-50.
(Reliability No. 4.)
3. EPA Region V file review by GCA/Technology Division. December 1981.
4. Development Document for Proposed Effluent Limitations Guidelines and
Standards for the Iron & Steel Manufacturing Point Source Categories.
EPA-400/l-79/024a, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Effluent
Guidelines Division, Office of Water and Waste Management, Washington,
DC, Oct. 1979. pp. 18-49. (Reliability No. 4.)
5. Telephone conversation. Bernard Bloom, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC, to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division.
December 1980. (Reliability No. 2.)
6. EPA Region V files (notes by Mr. Harris, Ohio EPA after a 1979 plant
inspection).
7. Goldman, L. J., and D. W. Coy. Technical Support Document for Control of
Coke Oven Pushing Emissions. Research Triangle Institute, Research
Triangle Park, NC. EPA Contract No. 687-01-4141. RACT Box No.
506379-506486. (Reliability No. 4.)
8. Sampling and Analysis of Particulate Emissions from Inlet and Outlet of
Coke Plant East and West Precipitators, ARMCO Steel Corporation/Houston,
Texas. Southwestern Labs. November 16-18 and 22, 1976. JACA Library.
(Reliability No. 1.)
9. Stack Tests at ARMCO/Houston—Coke Side Shed. Oct. 26-28, 1976. South-
western Laboratories. RACT Box No. 505465-505538. (Reliability No. 1.)
10. Coke Oven Wet Electrostatic Precipitator Stack Emission Sampling;
Particulates, Phenol and Alyanides. ARMCO Steel Corporation/Houston,
Texas. July 29 and August 1, 1977. Southwestern Labs. JACA Library.
(Reliability No. 1.)
168
-------
11. Coke Oven Wet Electrostatic Precipitator Stack Emission Sampling;
Particulates, Phenol and Alyanides. ARMCO Steel Corporation/Houston,
Texas- May 1, 1979. Southwestern Labs. JACA Library. (Reliability
No. 1.)
12. Coke Oven Wet Electrostatic Precipitator Stack Emission Sampling;
Particulates, Phenol and Alyamides. ARMCO Steel Corporation/Houston,
Texas. July 3 and 5, 1979. Southwestern Labs. JACA Library.
(Reliability No. 1.)
13. EPA Region V files (Renewal Permit Appl.—dated 1/26/79, Permit
180901000GP013).
14. Telephone conversation Sceve Samorgin, Ohio Environmental Protection
Agency—Southwest District to Sandy Beaton, GCA/Technology Division.
November 1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
15. Summary sheets compiled by PEDCo Environmentalists, Inc. from stack test
reports contained in regional EPA offices. Given to JACA Corp. for steel
library by Tom Maslany, EPA Region III. (Reliability No. 1.)
16. EPA Region V files (Permit Appl. for No. 3 Coke Plant—dated 8/3/78—
prepared by Bruce Steiner).
17. Telephone conversation. Ed Luebering, SW District Ohio EPA to Gene
Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. March 9, 1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
18. Telephone conversation and letter response. Bill Nuver, Pennsylvania
Department of Environmental Resources, Bethlehem, PA to Sandy Beaton,
GCA/Technology Division. November 1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
19. Letter communication. Anthony F. Fazio, Vice President, Chemico Air
Pollution Control Corporation, a Division of Envirotech Corporation to
Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division. December 1980. (Reliability
No. 4.)
20. Letter from J. McGrogan, Pennsylvania Dept. of Environmental Resources,
Weinersvllle, PA to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. February 19,
1981. (Reliability No. 1.)
21. Draft Inspection Report, Halcon-II Car Operation/Battery 5, Bethlehem
Steel Corp., Bethlehem, PA. JACA Corp. September 19, 1979. RACT Box
No. 503615-503594. (Reliability No. 1.)
22. RACT Box No. 503752-5903756 (Reliability No. 1.)
23. Telephone conversation. Bernard Bloom, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division.
February 1980. (Reliability No. 2.)
169
-------
24. Petroccia, M. et al. Assessment of Air Emissions from and Controls for
Iron and Steelmaklng Sources. Bethlehem Steel Corporation/Burns Harbor
Coke Butteries I and 2. Chesterton, Indiana. GCA/Technology Division
Draft Final Report. Prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
July 1980. (Reliability No. 1.)
25. Telephone conversation. Andy Sunderland, Indiana State Air Pollution
Control to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. March 3, 1981.
(Reliability No. 2)
26. Symows, Carl R.. Coke Oven Pushing—Emission Control with a Hooded
One-Spot Coke Receiver and Remote Gas Cleaner. Presented at Technical
Conference on Control of Air Emissions from Coke Plants. Pittsburgh,
PA. April 17-19. pp. 47-53. (Reliability No. 3.)
27. Iron & Steel Engineer. 57(6):76. June 1980. (Reliability No. 3.)
28. Stack Tests at Bethlehem Steel Corp./Burns Harbor. RACT Box No.
504765-504772. (Reliability No. 1.)
29. RACT Box No. 503717-503719. (Reliability No. 1.)
30. Telephone conversation. Bob Clark, Pennsylvania Department of
Environmental Resources to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division.
October 29, 1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
31. Computer printout. Prepared by PEDCo Environmentalists, Inc. for U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Coke battery data
compilation for the United States. (Reliability No. 2-3.)
32. RACT No. 504919-504942. No. 18 Battery, Bethlehem Steel Corp./Johnstown
Push Control Car Stack Tests. (Reliability No. 1.)
33. Telephone conversation. Henry Sandonato, New York State Department of
Environmental Conservation to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.
February 17, 1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
34. Letter response. Richard Craig, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Region II to William Farino, GCA/Technology Division. December 1981.
(Reliability No. 1.)
35. Telephone conversation. Mark Sylvester, Maryland State Department of
Health and Mental Hygiene to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division.
February 13, 1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
36. GCA/Technology Division. Ralph Hall, Maryland State Department of Health
and Mental Hygiene to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division. October
29, 1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
37. Pollutant Control of Coke-Oven Emissions. Iron & Steel Engineer,
Industry News. 57(9):107. Sept. 1980. (Reliability No. 3.)
170
-------
38. Oliver, J. F. and J. T. Sanne. Control of Visible Emissions at CF&I's
Coke Plant—Pueblo, Colorado. JAPCA. 29(9):920-925. Sept. 1976.
(Reliability No. 1.)
39. Dion, J. A. and G. D. Young. Coke Battery Survey. CF&I Steel
Corporation in Pueblo, Colorado. April 1979. EPA-330/1-78-005. RACT
Box No. 503469 (start). (Reliability No. 1.)
AO. Telephone conversation. Dennis Myers, Colorado State Department of
Health to Stephen Piper, GCA/Technology Division. February 1981.
(Reliability No. 2.)
41. Emission testing of North and South Coke Plant Push Control Gas Cleaning
Cars. CF&I Steel Corp./Pueblo Works. Final Report. Almega Project No.
1-5394. April 15, 1980. JACA Library- (Reliability No. 1.)
42. Nunno, T., et al. Assessment of Air Emissions from Steel Plant Sources.
Ford Motor Co./River Rouge Plant—Coke Plant Inspection. GCA/Technology
Division Draft Final Report No. TR-81-38-G. April 1981. Prepared for
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (Reliability No. 1.)
43. EPA Region V files (Ford Motor Co. response to EPA questionnaire dated
February 21, 1978).
44. Copper, F., et al., Emission Testing and Evaluation of Ford/Koppers Coke
Pushing Control System: Volume 1. Final Report. EPA-600/2-77-187a.
September 1977. (Reliability No. 1.)
45. EPA Regon V files (Ford Motor Co. 3rd quarter progress report to EPA—
10/16/81).
46. McClelland, R. 0. Coke Oven Smokeless Pushing System Design Manual.
EPA-650/2-74-076. Sept. 1974. RACT Box No. 503811-503884. (Reliability
No. 3.)
47. Telephone conversation. Phil Pekron, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region V to Sandy Beaton, GCA/Technology Division. October
1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
48. Spawn, P. Assessment of Air Emissions from Steel Plant Operations.
Inland Steel Co./Indiana Harbor Works—Plant Inspection. GCA/Technology
Division Final Report No. TR-80-85-G. Prepared for U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency. April 1980. (Reliability No. 1.)
49. Inland Steel Publication. Air, Water and Inland Steel. 1979.
(Reliability No. 4.)
50. EPA Region V files (Letter from Inland Steel to EPA—August 1981).
51. EPA Region V engineers comments to GCA questionnaire. December 1981.
171
-------
52. Report of Emissions Tests at Inland Steel Corp. Coke Plant No. 3—Coke
Oven Battery C, Coke Side Shed. Clean Air Engineering. Tests during
March 18, 1975. RACT Box No. 505035-505132. (Reliability No. 1.)
53. Telephone conversation. Don Kuh, Indiana State Air Pollution to Gene
Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. March 4, 1981. (Reliability No. 4.)
54. Participate Emissions Testing on Push Control System Scrubber Exhaust.
Inland Steel Corp./Indiana Harbor Works—Coke Battery No. 11. Almega
Corp. Nov. 17, 1978. RACT Box No. 505165-505306. (Reliability No. 1.)
55. Cost Effectiveness Model for Pollution Control of Coke Facilities.
EPA-609/2-79-185. August 1979. Table 8. (Reliability No. 4.)
56. EPA Region V files (Test Report on Interlake Steel's Co. Push Control
System—June 1980).
57. Telephone conversation. J. Sokorowski, City of Chicago Department of
Inspectional Services to Marc Grant, GCA/Technology Division. March 5,
1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
58. Telephone conversation. Ken Bowman, Pennsylvania Department of
Environmental Resources to Mike Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division.
February 18, 1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
59. RACT Box No. 503720-503722. (Reliability No. 1.)
60. Iron & Steel Engineer. 56(3):72. March 1979. (Reliability No. 4.)
61. Petroccia, M. W., et al. Assessment of Air Emissions from and Controls
for Iron and Steelmaking Sources. J&L Steel Corp./Aliquippa Works.
GCA/Technology Division Final Report No. TR-81-57-G. Prepared for U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency. July 1981. (Reliability No. 1.)
62. Telephone conversation. Ted Davis, NE District Ohio EPA to Gene Bergson,
GCA/Technology Division. February 27, 1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
63. EPA Region V files (J&L Steel Corp. letter to EPA dated April 1978).
64. Telephone conversation. Edward Wojciechowski, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region V to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.
February 4, 1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
65. EPA Region V files (J&L letter to EPA—1981).
66. Telephone conversation. S. Banninthaya, Allegheny County Department of
Health to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. February 12, 1981.
(Reliability No. 2.)
67. Telephone conversation. S. Bannithaya, Allegheny County Department of
Health to Sandy Beaton, GCA/Technology Division. November 3, 1981.
(Reliability No. 2.)
!
172
-------
68. Spawn, P. and R. Li. Assessment of Air Emissions from and Controls for
Iron and Steelmaking Operations. Kaiser Steel Corp. in Fontana, CA—Coke
Plant Inspection. GCA/Technology Division.Final Report No. TR-79-53-G.
Prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. December 1980.
(Reliability No. 1.)
69. Telephone conversation. Lois Green, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region IX to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division. November
1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
70. Cochran, L. M. and D. A. Mitchell. New Coke Oven Emissions Control
System at Lone Star Steel Company. Presented at the 73rd Annual Meeting
of the Air Pollution Control Association. Montreal, Canada. June 22-27,
1980. pp. 1-6. (Reliability No. 3.)
71. Telephone conversation. Tom Blair, Radian Corporation to Gene Bergson,
GCA/Technology Division. March 3, 1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
72. Testing at Lone Star Steel Corp. in Lone Star, TX. Coke Push Control
System on Battery "C". Testing September-December 1979. (Reliability
No. 1.)
73. EPA Region V files (National Steel/Great Lakes Steel Division response to
EPA questionnaire—2/21/78).
74. EPA Region V files (Data supplied to EPA by National Steel/Great Lakes
Steel Division).
75. Telephone conversation. Anton Telford, Illinois State Environmental
Protection Agency to Sandy Beaton, GCA/Technology Division. October
1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
76. EPA Region V files (Stack tests at NSC/Granite City. No. 2 Push Control
Car in 1980).
77. Fornadley, R. J. Granite City: Bold Modernization of an Integrated
Steel Plant. Iron & Steel Engineer. August 1980. pp. SL-67-SL-80.
(Reliability No. 3.)
78. Spawn, P. et al. Assessment of Air Emissions from Iron and Steelmaking
Sources. National Steel Corp./Weirton Steel Division—Plant Inspection
in August 1981. GCA/Technology Division Final Report No. TR-81-118-G.
Prepard for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. November 1981.
(Reliability No. 1.)
79. Telephone conversation. John Raggi, West Virginia Air Pollution Control
to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. February 17, 1981.
(Reliability No. 2.)
173
-------
80. Metzger, D. J. and D. F. Cairns. Development of the Two-Step Quench
(TSQ) System. Paper presented at the Lake Michigan States Section, Air
Pollution Control Association, Specialty Conference. Chicago, IL. April
1981. (Reliability No. 3.)
81. Koppers One-Spot Push Control System Design Data. National Steel
Corp./Weirton Steel Division. Coke Battery 1-1. Supplied to
GCA/Technology Division by Tom Shiland, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region III. October 1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
82. Letter response. Paul Pate, Director of Jefferson County Department of
Health to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division. December 1981.
(Reliability No. 1.)
83. EPA Region V files (Arthur D. little report on a new coke battery at
Republic Steel Corp. in Chicago, IL—1978).
84. Dust Collector Study at Republic Steel Corp./Chicago District in Chicago,
IL. Testing by Mostardi-Platt Associates, Inc. March 1977. RACT Box
No. 505009-505034. (Reliability No. 1.)
85. Letter response. Gary Nied, Cleveland Division of Air Pollution to Gene
Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. March 9, 1981. (Reliability No. 1.)
86. Stack Tests at Republic Steel Corp./Cleveland District. No. 1 Coke
Battery Push Control System. November 28 and 29, 1979. RACT Box No.
504869-504888. (Reliability No. 1.)
87. Stack Tests at Republic Steel Corp./Cleveland District. Coke Pushing
Emission Tests on the Koppers No. 12 One-Spot Gas Cleaning Car. June
1979. RACT Box No. 504889-504918. (Reliability No. 1.)
88. Telephone conversation. Mr. Habib, Cleveland Air Pollution Control to
Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. February 27, 1981. (Reliability
No. 2.)
89. EPA Region V files (Stack Test Reports—Republic Steel Corp./Cleveland
District).
90. Telephone conversation. Sue Robertson, Alabama State Air Pollution
Control to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division. October 27, 1981.
(Reliability No. 2.)
91. EPA Region V files (Trip Report by Dan Bakk—2/20/80).
92. EPA Region V files (1974 permits).
93. Spawn, P., et al. Assessment of Air Emissions from and Controls for Iron
and Steelmaking Sources. United States Steel Corporation/Clairton Works
Coke Plant in Clairton, PA. GCA/Technology Division Draft Final Report
No. TR-80-30-G. Prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
April 1981. (Reliability No. 1.)
174
-------
94. Source Sheet on USSC/Clairton Coke Battery No. 7, RACT No. 500478.
(Reliability No. 1.)
95. Source Sheet on USSC/Clairton Coke Battery No. 8, RACT No. 500484.
(Reliability No. 1.)
96. Source Sheet on USSC/Clairton Coke Battery No. 9, RACT No. 500490.
(Reliability No. 1.)
97. Source Sheet on USSC/Clairton Coke Battery No. 17, RACT No.
505575-505870. (Reliability No. 1.)
98. Source Sheet on USSC/Clairton Coke'Battery No. 16, RACT No. 500528.
(Reliability No. 1.)
99. Source Sheet on USSC/Clairton Coke Battery No. 17, RACT No. 500541.
(Reliability No. 1.)
100. Source Sheet on USSC/Clairton Coke Battery No. 19, RACT No. 500553.
(Reliability No. 1.)
101. Source Sheet on USSC/Clairton Coke Battery No. 20, RACT No. 500562.
(Reliability No. 1.)
102. Source Sheet on USSC/Clairton Coke Battery No. 21, RACT No. 500569.
(Reliability No. 1.)
103. Source Sheet on USSC/Clairton Coke Battery No. 22, RACT No. 500581.
(Reliability No. 1.)
104. Spawn, P. et al. Assessment of Air Emissions from and Controls for Iron
and Steelmaking Sources. United States Steel Corporation/Fairfield Works
in Fairfield, AL. GCA/Technology Division Draft Final Report No.
TR-79-59-G. Prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
September 1979. (Reliability No. 1.).
105. Coke Battery Survey Procedures, Description, and Data Presentation.
USSC/Fairfield Works in Fairfield, AL. EPA-330/1-77-012. December
1977. RACT No. 501519. (Reliability No. 1.)
106. Stack Test on Battery No. 2—Push Control Car. USSC/Fairfield Works in
Fairfield, AL. RACT No. 504783-504806. (Reliability No. 1.).
107. EPA Region V files (U.S. Steel Corp./Gary Works response to EPA
interrogatory—May 1979).
108. EPA Region V files (U.S. Steel Corp./Gary Works Litigation Report—12/77).
109. Telephone conversation. Roland Elvambuena, City of Gary Health
Department to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. March 1981.
(Reliability No. 2.)
175
-------
110. EPA Region V files (Test Reports on U.S. Steel Corp./Gary Works Emission
Sources)•
111. Letter response. Dennis Bush, Ohio State Environmental Protection Agency
to Sandy Beaton, GCA/Technology Division. November 1981. (Reliability
No. 1.)
112. National Enforcement Investigation Center, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency. Report on Plant Inspection at U.S. Steel Corp./Geneva Works.
1977. (Reliability No. 2.)
113. Letter from U.S. Steel Corp./Geneva Works to Connally Hears, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Region VIII. Baghouse—Coke Side Shed
Design Data. April 24, 1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
114. Letter response. Richard Thomas, Pennsylvania Department of
Environmental Resources to Sandy Beaton, GCA/Technology Division.
December 1981. (Reliability No. 1.)
115. Telephone conversation and letter response. John Raggi, West Virginia
Air Pollution Control to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division.
November 1981. (Reliability No. 1.)
116. Emissions Test Report. Submitted to Allied Chemical Company, Semet-
Solvay Division, Ashland, KY. The Minister Stein System. York Research
Corp. Report No. 1-9868-04. June 7, 1979. (Reliability No. 1.)
117. Skalos, C. R. The Design and Start Up of a Dravo/Still, Minister Stein
Type Coke Oven Pushing Emission Control System. Presented at Technical
Conference on: Control of Air Emission from Coke Plants. Pittsburgh,
PA. April 17-19, 1979. pp. 64-73. (Reliability No. 2.)
118. Letter response. James Dills, State of Kentucky Department of Natural
Resources and Health to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division.
November 19, 1981. (Reliability No. 1.)
119. Letter response. Richard Knapp, City of St. Louis Department of Air
Pollution Control to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division. November
2, 1981. (Reliability No. 1.)
120. Telephone conversations. Richard Knapp and Tom Schippes, City of St.
Louis Department of Health, and Missouri State Air Pollution Control,
respectively, to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. February 24,
1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
121. Telephone conversation. Harvey Rice, Chattanooga Air Pollution Control
to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division. October 26, 1981.
(Reliability No. 2.)
122. Telephone conversation. Harvey Rice, Chattanooga Air Pollution Control
Bureau to Mike Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division. February 18, 1981.
(Reliability No. 2.)
176
-------
123. EPA Region V files (Citizens Gas and Coke Data supplied to EPA—1979).
124. Telephone conversation. Dave Jordan, Indianapolis Air Pollution Control
Board to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. March A, 1981.
(Reliability No. 2.)
125. The Fabric Filter Newsletter. Mcllvaine, Inc. (56):5. June 10, 1980.
(Reliability No. A.)
126. EPA Region V files (Detroit Coke).
127. Fabric Collector First For Coke Oven Emission Control. Iron & Steel
Engineer, 56(2):102. February 1979. (Reliability No. A.)
128. EPA Region V files (EPA Inspection on 5-28-80 at Detroit Coke).
129. Telephone conversation. Dennis Bush, NE District Ohio EPA to Gene
Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. February 27, 1981. (Reliability
No. 2.)
130. EPA Region V files (Ohio EPA Interoffice Memo From D. Bugh dated June
1980).
131. EPA Region V files (Consent Decree dated 2/5/79).
132. EPA Region V files (Phil Pekron 1979 Trip Report at Indiana Gas and
Chemical Corp.).
133. Stack Emission Test Report on Coke Pushing Scrubber. Indiana Gas &
Chemical Co./Terre Haute, IN. Environmental Technology & Engineering
Corp. October 8-10, 1979. JACA Library. (Reliability No. 1.)
13A. Telephone conversation. Ken Kearney, Indiana State Air Pollution Control
to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. March A, 1981. (Reliability
No. 2.)
135. EPA Region V files (Plant Progress Report, May 1981, to EPA Region V).
136. Advertisement in Iron & Steel Engineer, 57(8). August 1980.
(Reliability No. 3.)
137. Facility Scheduled for 1979 Start-Up. Iron & Steel Engineer,
56(10):103. October 1979. (Reliability No. 3.)
138. Telephone conversation. Frank Phillips, Portsmouth City Health
Department to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. February 27, 1981.
(Reliability No. 2.)
139. Fuller, D. H. The Alliance/Mitsubishi Pushing Emission Control System at
Ironton Coke Corp. Iron and Steel Engineer, 58(5):29-3A. May 1981.
(Reliability No. 3.)
177
-------
140. Telephone conversation. Veda Hampton, Jefferson County Department of
Health to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. February 25, 1981.
(Reliability No. 2.)
141. RACT Box No. 503715-503716. (Reliability No. 1.)
142. Telephone conversation. Larry Wonders, Pennsylvania Department of
Environmental Resources to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.
February 17, 1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
143. Telephone conversation. Bill Charleton, Pennsylvania Department of
Environmental Resources in Meadsville, PA, to Sandy Beaton,
GCA/Technology Division. November 1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
144. EPA Region V files (Permits—no date).
145. Telephone conversation. Tom Doktor, Toledo Pollution Control Agency to
Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. February 27, 1981. (Reliability
No. 2.)
146. EPA Region V files (Acurex observations of Koppers 1980 Stack Tests).
147. EPA Region V files (Stack Test by Koppers—1980).
148. Jasinski, M. R. Field Inspection Report of Major Air Point Source
Facilities in Region IV. EPA Contract No. 68-01-4143. RE; Koppers Co.,
Inc./Woodward Coke Plant. Inspected by GCA on July 8 and 9, 1980.
(Reliability No. 1.)
149. Telephone conversation. Jerry Bevington, Wisconsin Department of Natural
Resources to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. March 9, 1981.
(Reliability No. 2.)
150. Telephone conversation and letter response. Norman Glazer, City of
Philadelphia Air Management to Sandy Beaton, GCA/Technology Division.
November 1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
151. Telephone conversation. Robert King, City of Philadelphia Air Management
to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. February 13, 1981.
(Reliability No. 2.)
178
-------
.O
O C
O H
« S5
w n
v^ a
H
a;
o
MATERIAL IN THIS SECTION SUBJECT TO CONFIDENTIALITY
REVIEW AND IS NOT RELEASABLE AS OF FEBRUARY 1, 1982.
FOR INFORMATION, CONTACT L. KESARI, U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY, DIVISION OF STATIONARY SOURCE ENFORCEMENT.
-------
TABLE 1. ARMCO INC./HAMILTON PLANT IN HAMILTON, OH
COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/1):c
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF BAFFLES:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. I1 No. 21 No. 31 No. 41
Koppers-Becker (all four batteries)2
1927a»3 19381 19411 19471
1976b>4 1977b>4 1978b>4
1,930 (all four batteries combined)5
1,811 (all four batteries combined)5
No. 1 (serves all four batteries)4
Straight-through
Baffles7
Stainless steel7
19788
Baffles are "suppressor" type7
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery rebuilt 1961.1
^Involved end-flue rehabilitation.4
cQuench water is considered clean.2
179
-------
TABLE 2. ARMCO INC./HOUSTON WORKS IN HOUSTON, TX
COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:a
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/1):b
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF BAFFLES:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. I1
No. 21
Koppers-Becker^ Koppers-Becker^
19434 19531
19764 19774
1,045 (both batteries combined)5
840 (both batteries combined)5
No. 1 (serves both batteries)4
Rectangular9
TDS = 1,400 (rated)9
Baffles9
Wood9
• Baffles are arranged in 3 rows,
inclined 45°, in alternating
directions9
• Baffles located 1.75 m below top of
tower9
• Tower measures 20.7 m high with
outlet dimensions of 5.2 m x 14.2m9
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.4
^Quench water is considered clean.2
180
-------
TABLE 3. ARMCO INC./MIDDLETOWN WORKS IN MIDDLETOWN, OH
COKE PLANT NO. 2 COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION: No. I1
MANUFACTURER: Wilputte1
STARTUP DATE: 19532>4
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY: 5,150 (Coke Plants No. 2 and 3 combined)5
TYPICAL TONS/DAY: 4,890 (Coke Plants No. 2 and 3 combined)5
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION: No. I4
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER: Carl Still offset9
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):a TDS =* 560,10 TSS = 32210
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm): ~4,4509
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM: Baffles9*10
TYPE OF BAFFLES: Plastic9'10
DATE INSTALLED: 19766
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION: • Baffles located ~2.6 m from top of
tower, and inclined at 45° angles9
• A-frame baffle configuration9
• Tower constructed of stainless steel;
37.4 m high with cross-sectional area =
54.7 sq m (at highest point)9'10
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aQuench water is considered clean.2
181
-------
TABLE 4. ARMCO INC./MIDDLETOWN WORKS IN MIDDLETOWN, OH
COKE PLANT NO. 3 COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/1):a
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF BAFFLES:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. I1
Dravo-Still1
19761
No. 21
Dravo-Still1
19771
See previous page-*
No. 2 (serves both batteries)^
Round (tapered)9*10
TDS - 480,10 TSS - 15610
~5,1509
Baffles9'10
Stainless steel9'10
197410
• Baffles located 1.2 m from top of
tower, and inclined at 20° angles
(from vertical axis)9'10
• Baffles arranged in two opposing,
horizontal rows9'10
• Baffles are 10 in. high, and on 4 in.
centers10
• Tower constructed of brick; 30 m high
with base diameter = 5.1 m; and top
diameter = 4.3 m9'10
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aQuench water is considered clean.2
182
-------
TABLE 5. BETHLEHEM STEEL CORP./BETHLEHEM PLANT IN BETHLEHEM, PA
COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):b
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF BAFFLES:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
2A4
2B4
3B4
Koppers-Becker (all four batteries)2
19412 19412 19422 19422
5,840 (all six batteries combined)5
5,058 (all six batteries combined)5
No. 1 (serves
batteries 2A
and 2B)4
No. 2 (serves
batteries 3A
and 3B)4
(continued)
183
-------
TABLE 5 (continued)
COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):b
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF BAFFLES:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
.5*
Koppera-Becker^
1953a»2
A*
McKee-Otto^
19762
See previous page-*
No. 3 (serves
Battery No. 5)4
No. 4 (serves
Battery A)4
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery 5 rebuilt in 1977.1]-
bQuench water, for all four towers, is considered clean.
184
-------
TABLE 6. BETHLEHEM STEEL CORP./BURNS HARBOR PLANT IN CHESTERTON, IN
COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
No. I1
Wilputte1
196912
1980^,13
1982b»13
No. 21
Koppers1
197212
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):c
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF BAFFLES:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
6,670 (both batteries combined)5
5,179 (both batteries combined)5
No. 1 (serves both batteries)^
Straight-through13
Baffles13
Wood13
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
alnvolved changing steam nozzles, i.e., increasing aspiration, and rebuilding
battery top.13
^Scheduled shut down for rebuild, i.e., double collector mains to be
installed.13
cQuench water is dirty (recirculated); 53.9 percent of total quench water
volume is process wastewater.2>l3>14
185
-------
TABLE 7. BETHLEHEM STEEL CORP./JOHNSTOWN PLANT IN JOHNSTOWN, PA
COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3»*>
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
COKE PRODUCTION:0
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):d
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF BAFFLES:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No.
Koppers15*16
195115>16
19824»16
3,500 (for three battery operation)5
3,028 (for three battery operation)5
Straight-through17
Baffles17
Wood17
Mid-1960's17
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery No. 18 located in designated area known as the Franklin Plant.
Battery Nos. 17 and 19 (total—151 ovens) also in the Franklin Plant, were
shut down in 1977 due to a flood.^
^Johnstown facility also contained Battery Nos. 15 and 16 (total—88 ovens),
designated as the Rosedale Plant, which were shut down in 1977 due to a
flood.16
Production data shown for the Franklin Plant prior to the shut down of
Battery Nos. 17 and 19.5»16
^Quench water is dirty (recirculated); 11.1 percent of total quench water
volume is process wastewater.^*1^
186
-------
TABLE 8. BETHLEHEM STEEL CORP./LACKAWANNA PLANT IN LACKAWANNA, NY
COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATIONS
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
COKE PRODUCTION:d
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
No. 718
Wilputte2
19522
No. 918
No. 818
Wilputte2 Wilputte2
19692 1961b»2
1982C»19
8,140 (for seven battery operation)-*
6,908 (for seven battery operation)^
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/1):e
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpra):
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM: Baffles19
North (serves batteries
No. 7 and 9)18
Rectangular18
TYPE OF BAFFLES:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
Wood19
-197519
• Tower outlet dimen-
sions = 19 ft 10 in. x
19 ft18
Artie (serves
Battery No. 8)18
Rectangular18
Baffles19
Wood19
-197519
• Tower outlet
dimensions «
22 ft 5 in. x
56 ft18
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBatteries No. 3, 4, 5 and 6 were shut down in 1977.19
^Battery was completely rebuilt in I960.19
cScheduled shut down for rebuild.19
•^Production data reflects operation of Batteries No. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8,
and 9.5
eQuench water, for both towers, is dirty (recirculated).2
187
-------
TABLE 9. BETHLEHEM STEEL CORP./SPARROWS POINT PLANT IN SPARROWS POINT, MD
COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
No. I4 No. 2A No. 34
Koppers (all four batteries)2
I9602 19612 19512
1985b,20 I985b>20 1982C,2!
No. 4 4
19782
1985t>»20
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):d»e»f
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF BAFFLES:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
5,500 (all eight batteries combined)21
No. 1 (serves No. 2 (serves
batteries No. 1 batteries No. 3
and 2)20>22 and 4)20,22
Straight-through20 Straight-through20
TDS < 800 mg/1; TSS <100 mg/1 (both
towers)20
695-785 (both towers)22
(continued)
188
-------
TABLE 9 (continued)
COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):d>e»f
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:^
TYPE OF BAFFLES:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. 54 No. 64
See previous page2
19782 19532
1985b,20
No. II4 No. 124
Koppers-
Becker2
19552
Koppers-
Becker2
19572
See previous page-*
No. 3 (serves
batteries No. 5
and 6)20>22
Straight-
through20
No. 6 (serves
batteries No. 11
and 12)22
Straight-
through20
TDS <800 mg/1;20 TSS <100 mg/1
(both towers)20
695-785 (tower
No. 3)22
1,017 (tower
No. 6)22
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery Nos. 9 and 10 were shut down in early 1981.21
t>New Battery "A" to startup in December 1981; will use Carl Still, diverted
flow tower with baffles; new Battery "B" scheduled to startup in December
1985 will replace Battery Nos. 1, 2, 4, and 5.
cPlant has the option to either shut down Battery Nos. 3 and 6 in 1982,
or continue their operation until 1985.2^
^Industrial water used for quenching (all towers); salt water used for
quenching in emergency cases (all towers).22'2-^
eQuench water is considered clean water (all towers).2
fQuench water make-up from out-fall of sewage treatment plant (all towers).20
STower No. 6 will have baffles by the end of 1981.20
189
-------
TABLE 10. CF&I STEEL CORP./PUEBLO PLANT IN PUEBLO, CO
COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITAT
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):b
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF BAFFLES:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
ON DATE:
Koppers2
19 7 211
Koppers2
!9742,25
Koppers-
Becker2
I9602
1974a»2
South (serves Batteries (North (serves
B and C)9>24 Battery D)24
Rectangular9*24 Round24
TDS~2,300 (for both towers)24
3,080 (for both towers)9>24
Baffles24 Baffles24
Wood24 Wood24
• Both towers have similar baffle
arrangements, i.e., single layer in
one direction, angled at 45°2°
• Both towers had baffles repaired in
198026
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation, and conversion from single to double
collector mains.2
^Quench water, for both towers, is dirty (recirculated).2>24
190
-------
TABLE 11. FORD MOTOR CO./RIVER ROUGE PLANT IN DEARBORN, MI
COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):f
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF BAFFLES:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
Koppers-
Becker2
1937b,l
Wilputte1
197227
I979d,2
Koppers-
Becker2
1937C>!
1979d,2
4,340 (all five batteries combined)5
3,945 (all five batteries combined)5
No. I;* North28 (serves
batteries A, Ax, and B)
Rectangular28
Makeup water TDS = 111, and
recirculated water TDS = 156^9
815 (includes 225 gpm makeup water)28
Baffles28
• Series of baffles with spray
flushing28
• Wood tower measuring 142 ft high
with outlet cross-sectional
area = 256 sq ft28
(continued)
191
-------
TABLE 11 (continued)
COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:11
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/1):f
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF BAFFLES:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
Koppers-Becker2
1939e,l
1977d»2
Koppers-Becker2
19631
See previous
No. 2;4 South28 (serves
batteries C and Dx)
Rectangular28
Makeup water TDS = 101, and
recirculated water TDS =
867 (includes 298 gpm makeup water)28
Baffles28
• Series of baffles with spray
flushing28
• Brick tower measuring 74 ft high
with cross-sectional
area = 867 sq ft28
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery D pushed empty in 1972.27
^Battery rebuilt In 1964; 16 ovens have been hot and empty since 1964.
cBattery rebuilt in 1962.*
^Involved end-flue rehabilitation.2
eBattery rebuilt in 1963.!
^Quench water, for both towers, is considered clean.2
192
-------
TABLE 12. INLAND STEEL CO./INDIANA HARBOR WORKS IN E. CHICAGO, IN
COKE PLANT NO. 2 COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):b
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF BAFFLES:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. 61
No. 71
Koppers-Becker1 Koppers-Becker1
19501 19561
197ia,2 1974a»2
6,170 (all five batteries combined)5
5,640 (all five batteries combined)5
No. I;30 No. 2^ (serves batteries
No. 6 and 7)
Round9
Makeup water TDS <1,50031
5,0009
Baffles9
Wood9 >31
197030
• A-frame baffle configuration9
• Baffles located 1.2 m from top of
tower, and inclined at 45° angles9
• Brick tower measuring 31.4 m high
with outlet cross-sectional
area =» 18.7 sq m9
(continued)
193
-------
TABLE 12 (continued)
COKE PLANT NO. 2 COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):b
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF BAFFLES:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. 81
No. 91
No. 101
Koppers-Becker (all three batteries)1
19581
19591
19 701
See previous
No. 2;30 No. 34
(serves batteries
No. 8 and 9)
Round9
No. 3;30
No. 44
(serves
battery
No. 10)
Round9
Makeup water TDS <1,500 (for each
tower)31
5,000 (for each tower)9
Baffles9 Baffles9
Wood31 Wood31
197^30 19743°
• Baffle and tower description
(dimensions) same as tower serving
batteries No. 6 and 7 (see previous
page)9
: .1 = s = r 3 .S :
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.
^Quench water, for all towers, is dirty (recirculated): 16.7 percent of
total quench water volume is process wastewater.2>14>31
194
-------
TABLE 13. INLAND STEEL CO./INDIANA HARBOR WORKS IN E. CHICAGO, IN
COKE PLANTS NO. 3a and 4b COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS
AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):d
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF BAFFLES:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
Koppers1
19741
1979c,32
111
Koppers1
19781*32
3,014
(battery C)5
2,740
(battery C)5
No. 5 (serves
battery
Round9
2,500
(battery No. II)5
1,562
(battery No. II)5
No. 6 (serves
(battery No. II)4
Round9
Makeup water TDS 1,500 (for each
tower)31
Baffles9
Baffles9
Redwood9*31 Wood31
197832 197432
• Both towers similar, as follows;9
- Domed baffle configuration
- Baffles are 1 in. x 4 in. blades,
with 3.5 in. spacing between, and
inclined 15° from vertical
- Brick towers measuring 103 ft high
with outlet cross-sectional
area •= 531 sq ft
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery C.5
bBattery II.5
clnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2
•^Quench water, for both towers, is dirty (recirculated); 13.8 percent of
total quench water volume is process wastewater.2»14»31
195
-------
TABLE 14. INTERLAKE INC./RIVERDALE PLANT IN CHICAGO, IL
COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):b
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF BAFFLES:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. I1
Wilputte*
1956;33 195711
1979*>2
No. 21
Wilputte1
19571
1979a»2
1.850;1 1,7405 (both batteries
combined)
1,460 (both batteries combined)^
No. 1 (serves both batteries)^
Quench water TDS = 837 (includes
makeup water TDS = 218)34
10,000 gal/quench35
Grit Arrestors3^
• Mesh material covers top of the
-if- r
tower-*0
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2
^Quench water is considered clean.2
196
-------
TABLE 15. JONES & LAUGHLIN STEEL CORP./ALIQUIPPA WORKS IN ALIQUIPPA, PA
COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
COKE PRODUCTION:0
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):f
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF BAFFLES:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
Koppers-Becker^
19451
197837
A-5b>1
Koppers^
19762,33
4,308 (both batteries combined)3?
3,500 (both batteries combined)38
No. 1 and No. 2 OR No. 3 (serve both
batteries)38
Rectangular^39 Round6>39
TDS -1,030 (can be TDS ~7,500h>39
up to 1,325)6.39
2,207-2,890S»39
Baffles39
Wood39
197137
• Baffles are 2 ft
x 6 ft wooden
louvers, in-
clined 45°, and
mounted on an
A-frame with its
base 12 ft from
top of tower39
f Brick towers
measuring 60 ft
high, with outlet
cross-sectional
area = 1,071
sq ft39
14,400h>39
Baffles39
Wood39
197137
• Baffles are 1 ft
x 6 ft wood slats,
inclined 45°, and
located 10 ft from
top of tower39
• LO-MO® quench
process used*-'39
• Brick tower
measuring 100 ft
high
(continued)
197
-------
TABLE 15 (continued)
COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBatteries A-3 and A-4 were shut down In 1980.37
bBattery A-5 replaced Battery A-2 in 1975-1976.38
cProduction data for a 4-battery operation (A-l, A-3, A-4, and A-5) = 6,946
(rated tpd), 4,506 (typical tpd).5
dTower internally divided into three equal sections (15 ft x 17 ft each).39
eTower is actually two stacks joined to a common hood; base diameter of each
stack - 21 ft, with outlet diameters of 16 ft and 19 ft.39
fQuench water, for all towers, is dirty (recirculated).^
SMakeup water consists of 100 gpm coke side shed scrubber wastewater and
41 gpm of final cooler wastewater and service water.39
^Makeup water consists of 160 gpm lime-treated waste ammonia liquor and
service water.39
lLO-MO process—11 sec water application, 15 sec pause, and 29 sec water
application.39
198
-------
TABLE 16. JONES & LAUGHLIN STEEL CORP./CAMPBELL WORKS IN CAMPBELL, OH
COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
COKE PRODUCTION^
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):c
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF BAFFLES:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. 71
Wilputte1
195433
No. 91
Wilputte1
195833
4.000;1 3,8165 (for three battery
operation)
3,483 (for three battery operation)5
No. 4 (serves
battery
No. 7)59
Round
(tapered)39
TDS » 14.00039
3.50039
Baffles39
Wood39
No. 5;39 No. 2*
(serves battery
No. 9)
Round
(tapered)39
TDS - 14.00039
3.50039
Baffles39
Wood39
• Both towers similar, as follows;^*39
- Baffles installed at top of tower
(act as tower extension) in four
rows, and inclined at 45°
- Brick towers measuring 101 ft high,
with base diameter = 18 ft, and
top diameter = 14 ft
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery No. 8 shut down June 5, 1980.40
^Production data reflect operation of battery Nos. 7, 8, and
cQuench water, for both towers, is dirty (recirculated).2
^Except, tower No. 5 is 7 ft shorter than No. 4.39
199
-------
TABLE 17. JONES & LAUGHLIN STEEL CORP./INDIANA HARBOR WORKS
IN E. CHICAGO, IN
COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:8
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
COKE PRODUCTION:c
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/1):d
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF BAFFLES:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. 41
Kopper
195634,41
No. 91
Koppers-Becker2 Koppers-Becker2
ioc:/:34.41 1961^>42
I979b»2
4,050;! 4.0005 (for three battery
operation)
3,406 (for three battery operation)^
No. 4 (serves No. 9 (serves
battery No. 4)43 battery No. 9)43
Round42
Makeup water
TDS - 537 (for
tower No. 4)43
Baffles42
Brick and
concrete42
195242
• Baffles are
impingement
,42
Rectangular'
Makeup water
TDS - 449 (for
tower No. 9)43
Baffles42
Brick and
concrete42
196142
• Baffles are
impingement
type^
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery No. 3 permanently shut down.42
^Involved end-flue rehabilitation.2»42
cProduction data reflect operation of battery Nos. 3, 4, and
^Quench water, for both towers, is considered clean.2
200
-------
TABLE 18. JONES & LAUGHLIN CORP./PITTSBURGH WORKS IN PITTSBURGH, PA
COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):b
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF BAFFLES:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
Wilputte1
19 601
197944
P21
Wilputte1
19 611
1977a»2
P3N1
Wilputte1
19611
1980a>44
5,300 (all five batteries combined)5
5,230 (all five batteries combined)5
No. 1 (serves all three batteries)4
Rectangular9
~600 gal/ton coke44
Baffles9
Wood9
• One horizontal row of baffles located
approximately 2.3 m from top of
tower9
• Baffle blades inclined A5°9
• Wooden tower measuring 18.3 m high
with outlet cross-sectional area =
107 sq m9
(continued)
201
-------
TABLE 18 (continued)
COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/1):b
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF BAFFLES:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
P3S1
Wilputte1
19611
1978a>2
Koppers-Becker2
19531
1977a>2
See previous page-*
No. 4 (serves both batteries)*
Rectangular"
~600 gal/ton coke**
Baffles9
Wood9
• A-frame baffle configuration located
approximately 2.5 m from top of
tower9
• Baffle blades inclined 45 °9
• Wooden tower measuring 30.5 m high,
with outlet cross-sectional area **
20.9 sq m9
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2
^Quench water, for both towers, is considered clean.2***
202
-------
TABLE 19. KAISER STEEL CORP. IN FONTANA, CA
COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:a
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/1):d
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF BAFFLES:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
Koppers-Becker (all three batteries)^
194245 194245 1949*5
19732 197345 197645
4,250;! 4,1005 (all seven batteries
combined)
3,800 (all seven batteries combined)5
No. 1 (serves all three
Straight-through47
Baffles47*48
Wood; 47 redwood48
(continued)
203
-------
TABLE 19 (continued)
COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):d
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF BAFFLES:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
Koppers-Becker (all three batteries)^
194945 195245 195245
1976a,45 !979_ 1978b»45
1980b,45
See previous
No. 2 (serves all three batteries)c>46
Straight-through47
Baffles47*48
Wood;47 redwood48
(continued)
204
-------
TABLE 19 (continued)
COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/1):d
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF BAFFLES:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
Fl
Koppers-Becker^ Koppers-Becker^
195845 195845
See previous page-"->5
No. 3 (serves both batteries)4^
Straight-through47
Baffles47>48
Wood;47 redwood48
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
alnvolved trim work.45
blnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2>45
cBattery C is served by either quench tower No. 1 or No. 2.4&
^Quench water, for all towers, is dirty (recirculated); 43.8 percent of
total quench water volume is process wastewater.^»l4
205
-------
TABLE 20. LONE STAR STEEL IN LONE STAR, TX
COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3 C4
MANUFACTURER: Koppers2
STARTUP DATE: 197911
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
COKE PRODUCTION:b
RATED TONS/DAY: 1,214s
TYPICAL TONS/DAY: 6905
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION: No. I1
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER: Straight-through
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):c»d
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM: Baffles49
TYPE OF BAFFLES: Wood49
DATE INSTALLED: 197949
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBatteries A and B (total—78 ovens) were shut down in 1979.49
^Production data appears to be for the old batteries.^
cQuench water is considered clean.2
^Quench water is recirculated.49
206
-------
TABLE 21. NATIONAL STEEL CORP./GREAT LAKES STEEL DIVISION IN ECORSE, MI
COKE PLANT NO. 2 COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/1):c
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:d
TYPE OF BAFFLES:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. 31
Wilputte1'50
19542>50
1982b>52
No. 41
Wilputte1*50
19562»50
1974a,51
2,500 (both batteries combined)5
2,500 (both batteries combined)5
No. 3 (serves
battery No. 3)50
Round50
No. 4 (serves
battery No. 4)50
Rectangular50
Make-up water TDS Make-up water TDS
= 221, and recircu- 108, and recircu-
lated water TDS = lated water TDS =
221 (for tower 179 (for tower
No. 3)53 No. 4)53
8,300 gals/hour
(for tower
No. 3)50
9,330 gals/hour
(for tower
No. 4)50
• Brick tower
measuring 105 ft
high, with out-
let diameter =
11 ft50
• Wood tower
measuring 72 ft
high, with out-
let cross-
sectional area =
256 sq ft50
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.5^
bScheduled shut down for rebuild, with startup in 1985.52
cQuench water, for both towers, is dirty (recirculated).2>50
^Baffles, in both towers, to be installed in future (no baffles presently
within either tower).50
207
-------
TABLE 22. NATIONAL STEEL CORP./GREAT LAKES STEEL DIVISION IN ECORSE, MI
COKE PLANT NO. 3 COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/1):a
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:b
TYPE OF BAFFLES:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. 51
Otto1>50
19701.2
3,412:50 2,900s
2,700s
No. 550
Rectangular^O
Make-up water TDS = 221, and
recirculated water TDS = 27053
17,800 gals/hour50
• Wood tower measuring 86 ft high
with outlet cross-sectional area
= 1,386 sq ft50
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aQuench water is dirty (recirculated).2»50
^Baffles to be installed in future (no baffles presently in tower).50
208
-------
TABLE 23. NATIONAL STEEL CORP./GRANITE CITY STEEL DIVISION
IN GRANITE CITY, IL
COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATIONS
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):c
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF BAFFLES:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
Ab,54
McKee-Otto54
I96054
760-85354
No. I4
Rectangular-'-'
Make-up water TDS - 450-75734
Baffles55>56
Wood55
197756
• Single row of baffles with 3-inch
gap between each row55
• Tower measures 52 ft high, with
outlet cross-sectional area «
1,056 sq ft55
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aPlant formerly operated batteries B and C which contained 49 and 61 ovens,
respectively. These batteries are currently being rebuilt similar to battery
A and will contain 45 and 47 ovens, respectively.54
battery replaced a similar type Koppers-Becker battery containing
27 ovens.54
cQuench water is dirty (recirculated); 7.1 percent of total quench water
volume is process wastewater.^*!4
209
-------
TABLE 24. NATIONAL STEEL CORP./WEIRTON STEEL DIVISION IN WEIRTON, WV
COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/1):
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF BAFFLES:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
M-71
Koppers-
Becker^
19511
198258
M-81
Koppers-
Becker^
195347
1979b>57
4,500 (for four battery
operation)d>5
4,066 (for four battery
operation)4*»5
No. 2
(serves
battery
M-7)4
Rectangu-
Iar57,l8
f,g
No. 3
(serves
battery
M-8)4
Rectangu-
Iar59
f,g
~5,40057
Koppersl
19 7 31
1979C»2
3,600 (battery
1-1)5
3,000 (battery
1-1)5
g,h
18,000-20,000
gal/quench (for
open area
quenching)6»5'
Baffles57,58,59
Wood57,58,59
1978;57 197958
• Baffles are
water-^wash type^'
• Test Data
(1980);JT59
Tower west
side: 270,762-
307,942 acfm
(wet) at 132-
159°F (range)
(continued)
210
-------
TABLE 24 (continued)
COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
Tower east
side: 244,127-
229,034 acfm
(wet)a 134-
140°F (range)
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBatteries M-5 and M-6 (total of 106 ovens) were shut down in September-
October 1980.57,58
^Involved end-wall rehabilitation.57
clnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2
^Production data for the "mainland" reflects a four battery operation
(M-5, M-6, M-7, and M-8).5»58
eTwo systems used: (1) Continuous Wet Quench (CWQ) or, (2) Conventional
batch wet quench (no tower or baffles), process done in open area.->7>60
fQuench water is dirty (recirculated) water; 22.1 percent of total quench
water volume is from process wastewater.2,14
SOhio River water used for make-up water.57
^Quench water is considered clean.^
iNo baffles within tower No. 2.57,58
J1980 testing of Tower No. 3 occurred when; (1) just-pushed coke was
quenched, and (2) coke partially quenched by PECT hood was further
quenched.59
211
-------
TABLE 25. REPUBLIC STEEL CORP./SOUTHERN STEEL DISTRICT, THOMAS WORKS
IN BIRMINGHAM, AL
COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):c»d
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF BAFFLES:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. I1
Koppers1
19418*1
1981b,61
1,066;5 9501
5605
No. I4
Rectangular61
Baffles61
Wood62
• Baffles arranged laterally61
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery was rebuilt in 1969.2
^Involved end-flue rehabilitation.61
cQuench water is considered clean.2
^Quench, water is recirculated.62
212
-------
TABLE 26. REPUBLIC STEEL CORP./CHICAGO DISTRICT IN CHICAGO, IL
COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:b
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):c
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF BAFFLES:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. I1
Wilputte63
194311,63
1981a,63
1,369;3 1.20063
1,3005
No. I4
Baffles64
Wood64
197164
• Baffles are slat type64
• Tower is constructed of wood36
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery No. 1 will be replaced (late 1981) by Battery No. 2 (containing
60 ovens, 6 m high, double collector mains, 4 charge holes, automatic lid
lifters, using stage charging and rated at 1,800 tons of coke per day.63>64
tower to be replaced (late 1981) by a new quench tower with baffled
mist suppression and clean make-up water.64
cQuench water is considered clean. 2
213
-------
TABLE 27. REPUBLIC STEEL CORP./CLEVELAND DISTRICT IN CLEVELAND, OH
COKE PLANT NO. 1 COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:b
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):c>d
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF BAFFLES:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. I1 No. 21 No. 31 No. 41
Koppers (all four batteries)^-
197611 19582 19582 19582
19722 19722 19722
2,782 (all four batteries combined)5
2,049 (all four batteries combined)5
Nos. 1 and 2 (serve battery Nos. 1-4)65
Rectangular (both towers)65*66
Total dissolved solids = 833 (both towers)65
Baffles (both towers)66
Wood (both towers)66
• Both towers are constructed of wood65
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery No. 5 was shut down In 1975. 65
^Included end-flue rehabilitation.2
cBoth towers use dirty (recirculated) quench water.2
Nos. 1 and 2 use 62.1% process wastewater of the total quench water
volume. 1^
214
-------
TABLE 28. REPUBLIC STEEL CORP./CLEVELAND DISTRICT IN CLEVELAND, OH
COKE PLANT NO. 2 COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:b
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):c
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF BAFFLES:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. 61
Koppers-Becker
195233
19792
No. 71
Koppers-Beckerl
195233
19792
1,954 (both batteries combined)5
1,286 (both batteries combined)5
No. A (serves both batteries)65
Round65*66
• Tower constructed of brick65
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery No. 5 was shut down in 1975.65
^Included end-flue rehabilitation.2
cTower No. 4 uses dirty (recirculated) quench water, with 28.3% process
wastewater in the total quench water volume.2»-^
215
-------
TABLE 29. REPUBLIC STEEL CORP./SOUTHERN DISTRICT, GULFSTEEL WORKS
IN GADSDEN, AL
COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):b
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF BAFFLES:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. 21
Wilputte67
194267
1973a>2
No. 31
Wilputte67
1960&7
2,372;5 1.4001 (both batteries
combined)
1,785 (both batteries combined)5
No. 1 (serves both batteries)^
Rectangular67
Baffles67
Wood (treated)67
197367
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2
^Quench water is considered clean water.2>67
216
-------
TABLE 30. REPUBLIC STEEL CORP./CENTRAL ALLOY DISTRICT IN MASSILLON, OH
COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):a
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF BAFFLES:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. I1
Koppers^
19551
198211
576:5 5001
500$
No. I4
Straight-through68
Baffles68
Wood68
197569
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aQuench water is considered clean water.2,68
217
-------
TABLE 31. REPUBLIC STEEL CORP./MAHONING VALLEY DISTRICT IN WARREN, OH
COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:a
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):b»c
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF BAFFLES:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. 41
Koppers70
19792
No. 44
Straight-through40
264,000 gpd7
Baffles40
Wood40
197940
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBatteries No. 1 and 2 were shut down in March 1979.40
^Quench water is dirty (recirculated) water.2,40
C16.3% of total quench water volume is process wastewater.^-4
218
-------
TABLE 32. REPUBLIC STEEL CORP./MAHONING VALLEY DISTRICT IN YOUNGSTOWN, OH
COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):c
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF BAFFLES:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
Koppersl Koppersl
19501 1950*>1
Al
Koppersl
195Q1
i982b.ll
2.970;5 2.6041 (all three batteries
combined)4
2,735 (all three batteries combined)5
No. 1 (serves
batteries A and B)
Straight-through*0
Baffles
Wood40
197071
40
No. 2 (serves
battery C)4
Straight-
through40
Baffles40
Wood40
197071
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery rebuilt in 1962.2
"Scheduled shut down by Federal Consent Decree.H>4°
cQuench water, in both towers, is dirty (recirculated): 11.1 percent of
total quench water volume is process wastewater.2>14>40
219
-------
TABLE 33. UNITED STATES STEEL CORP./CLAIRTON WORKS IN CLAIRTON, PA
COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/1):a
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF BAFFLES:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. 1
72
No. 272
No. 372
Wilputte2 Wilputte2 Wilputte2
195572 195572 195572
1979?2 197972 197972
20,780 (entire coke plant)5
16,342 (entire coke plant)5
No. 1 (serves all three batteries)^
Rectangular9
I9609
Baffles9
Redwood9
• Single tier baffles, inclined 34°,
located at 6 m height9
• Each baffle is 1.9 cm x 15 cm (4.1 cm
spacing)9
• LO-MO® Quench method used9
• Wood tower measuring 30.5 m high, with
outlet cross-sectional area = 21.1
sq m9
(continued)
220
-------
TABLE 33 (continued)
COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
No. 772
Koppers2
195472
No. 872
Koppers2
195472
No. 972
Koppers2
195472
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/1):a
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF BAFFLES:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
19844
19844
1984*
See previous page-*
No. 3 (serves all three batteries)^
(continued)
221
-------
TABLE 33 (continued)
COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/1):a
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF BAFFLES:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. 1572 No. 1672 No. 1772
Koppers2 Wilputte2 Wilputte2
1953b>2 195072 195072
19824 19824
See previous pages-*
No. 5 No. 6 (serves batteries
(serves No. 16 and 17)4
battery No.
15)4
Carl Still offset44
Baffles44
Plastic44
197944
Straight-
through44
Baffles44
Wood44
(continued)
222
-------
TABLE 33 (continued)
COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):a
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF BAFFLES:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. 1972 No. 2072 No. 2172 No. 2272
Koppers-Becker (all four batteries)2
195172 1947C»72 194772 194672
197772 1972d>4 1973e»4
See previous pages-*
No. 7 (serves
batteries No. 19
and 20)4
No. 8 (serves
batteries No. 21
and 22)4
Carl-Still offset44 Straight-through44
Baffles44
Plastic44
197944
Baffles44
Wood44
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aQuench water, for all towers, is considered clean.2
bBattery rebuilt in 1979.2
cBattery rebuilt in 1978.72
dInvolved end-flue rehabilitation.4
elnvolved rehabilitation from bench up.72
223
-------
TABLE 34. UNITED STATES STEEL CORP./FAIRFIELD WORKS IN FAIRFIELD, AL
COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:8
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):d»e
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF BAFFLES:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. 273
U.S. Steel/Still2
197873
No. 973
Koppers-Becker2
195833
1974b,74
c
6,866 (appears to be for five battery
operation, i.e., Nos. 2, 5, 6, 7,
and 9)5
5,930 (appears to be for five battery
operation, i.e., Nos. 2, 5, 6, 7,
and 9)5
No. 2 (serves
battery No. 2)4>61
Carl Still
offset9'61
No. 9 (serves
battery No.
Rectangular
61
TDS < 0.5; TSS < 0.0261
~10,0459
Baffles9'61
Plastic;9 Wood61
197861
• A-frame baffle
configuration9
• Baffles are
inclined 45°9
• Wooden tower
measuring 37.1 m
high, with outlet
cross-sectional
area = 61.9 sq m9
Baffles61'62
Wood61'62
197761
• Lateral configura-
tion61
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 were shut down in 1977, 1977, 1980, 1980,
1979, and 1978, respectively.61'73
bBattery No. 9 was rebuilt in 1979.73
cBattery No. 9 has been idling hot since August 1980.61
^Quench water, for both towers, is considered clean.2
eQuench water, for both towers, is recirculated.62
224
-------
TABLE 35. UNITED STATES STEEL CORP./FAIRLESS WORKS IN FAIRLESS HILLS, PA
COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):b»c
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:d
TYPE OF BAFFLES:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. I1
Wilputte1
19522
1978a>2
No. 21
Wilputte1
19532
1978*»2
3,000 (both batteries combined)5
3,000 (both batteries combined)5
No. 1 (serves both batteries)^
Round7 5
ll.OOO75
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2
^Quench water is dirty (recirculated) water; 10.3 percent of total quench
water volume is process wastewater.2*-^
cQuench water is from the Delaware River.75
^Tower has no baffles.75
225
-------
TABLE 36. UNITED STATES STEEL CORP./GARY WORKS IN GARY, IN
COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:8
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
No. I76
Koppers-
Becker2
19702
1979b»2
No. 276
U.S. Steel/
Still2
19752
No. 376
U.S. Steel/
Still2
19762
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:
11,960 (all eight batteries combined)5
9,750 (all eight batteries combined)5
No. 1 (serves No. 2 (serves No. 3 (serves
battery battery battery
No. I)"76 No. 2)76 No. 3)'6
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/1):
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):
.c
Rectangu-
lar76
Make-up water
TDS <1,90477
100,000 gals/
hr (includes
18,650 gals/
hr make-up
water)78
Carl Still
offset42.76
Carl Still
offset42.76
Make-up water Make-up water
TDS <1,62777 TDS <1,62777
68,500 gals/
hr (includes
14,050 gals/
hr make-up
water)78
76,000 gals/
hr (includes
14,750 gals/
hr make-up
water)78
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM: Baffles42.76 Baffles42.76 Baffles42.76
TYPE OF BAFFLES:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
Wood^./o
197079
• Baffles are
impingement
type ; wood
louvered, and
angled76
• Wood tower
(concrete,
Plastic
(PVCi76
197579
• Baffles are
impingement
type; in-
stalled in
triangular
configura-
tion76
Plastic
(PVCi76
1§767$
• Baffles are
impingement
type; in-
stalled in
triangular
configura-
tion76
(continued)
226
-------
TABLE 36 (continued)
COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
base) • Wood/brick • Wood/Brick
measuring tower tower
90 ft high, measuring measuring
with outlet 107.8 ft 107 ft high,
dimensions high, with with outlet
= 24.9 ft x outlet dimensions =•
71.3 ft76 dimensions = 22.9 ft x
22.9 ft x 25.8 ft76
24.8 ft76
(continued)
227
-------
TABLE 36 (continued)
COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
No. 511
Wilputte2
19542
19884
No. 711
Wilputte2
195479
1978b»2
19884
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/1):c
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF BAFFLES:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
See previous pages^
No. 5 (serves both batteries)'"
Rectangular76
Make-up water TDS
-------
TABLE 36 (continued)
COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATIONS
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
No. 13 76
Koppers-
Becker2
19 512
1974b»2
19874
No. 1576
Wilputte2
19 512
1977b>2
No. 1676
Wilputte2
19492
1975b»2
19874
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):^
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF BAFFLES:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
See previous pages-*
No. 8 (serves batteries
No. 13 and 15)76
76
Rectangular
Make-up water
TDS <1,90477
173,000 gals/hr
(includes 6,150 gals/hr
make-up water)7**
Baffles42*76
Wood42'76
• Baffles are impinge-
ment type; wood,
louvered, and
angled76
• Brick tower measuring
94.8 ft high, with
outlet dimensions
= 17 ft x 45 ft76
No. 9 (serves
battery
No. 16)76
76
Rectangular
Make-up water
TDS <1,90477
60,500 gals/hr
(includes 6,150
gals/hr make-up
water)78
Baffles42'76
Wood42*76
194979
• Baffles are
impingement
type; wood,
louvered, and
angled76
• Brick tower
measuring 94.8
ft high, with
outlet dimen-
sions = 17 ft
x 45.3 ft76
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBatteries No. 9 and 11 pushed empty in 1971, Batteries No. 10, 12 and 14
pushed empty in 1975.7^
^Involved end-flue rehabilitation.2
CA11 towers use quench water that is dirty (recirculated); quench water
contains 7.6 percent process wastewater.14
229
-------
TABLE 37. UNITED STATES STEEL CORP./LORAIN—CUYAHOGA WORKS IN LORAIN, OH
COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:3
Dll
Koppers-
Becker2
19572
Gil
Koppers-
Becker2
19562
19772
Hll
Koppers-
Becker2
I95533
19782
111
Wilputte2
19552
19792
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:b
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):c»d
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF BAFFLES:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
198280
4,468 (all seven batteries combined)-*
4,319 (all seven batteries combined)^
No. 5
(serves
battery
Nos. 1 and 2 (serve
batteries G, H and I)81
Round39
4,50039
Baffles39*SI
Wood8!
• Baffles are 2-ft x 10-ft
boards, inclined 45°9>39
• LO-MO® quench process used
• Brick tower, with 15-ft inside
diameter at top and 120-ft
tall39
(continued)
230
-------
TABLE 37 (continued)
COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:a
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:b
JH
Wilputte2
19472
19702
Kll
Wilputte2
19472
19702
198280
Lll
Wilputte2
19472
19702
198280
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):c»d
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF BAFFLES:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
See previous page-*
Nos 3 and 4 (serve batteries J, K,
and L)81
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
alncluded end-flue rehabilitation.2
^Batteries, D, K and L are scheduled to be shut down in 1982, but have
applied for stretch out until 1985.52
CA11 towers use quench water that is dirty (recirculated) water.2
towers use quench water that contains 72.8% process wastewater.^
231
-------
TABLE 38. UNITED STATES STEEL CORP./GENEVA WORKS IN PROVO, UT
COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):b
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF BAFFLES:
DATE INSTALLED:0
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. 41
four
No. I1 No. 21 No. 31
Koppers;2 Koppers-Becker82
batteries)
1944; 2 19501 (all four batteries)
1979*>2 1979a>2
5.000;1 3,5585 (all four batteries
combined)
3,520 (all four batteries combined)5
South (serves
batteries No. 1
and 2)83
North (serves
batteries No. 3
and 4)83
Round83 Round83
TDS = 7,000-8,000 (for both towers)8^
4,000 gals/quench (for both towers)82
Baffles83 Baffles83
Tar impregnated redwood (both towers)83
197783 197783
• Baffles arranged similarly within both
towers as follows:83
Center section—single row, 3/4 in. x
7 in. x 5 ft 5 in., spaced on 9 in.
centers, and approximately 60% open
area
Side sections (2)—single row, 3/4 in.
x 7 in. at 45 angles, spaced on 10 in.
centers, and approximately 40% open
area
• Both towers are constructed of brick83
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2
^Quench water, for both towers, is dirty (recirculated) with 70.7 percent
of total quench volume from process wastewater.2'^
cBaffles originally installed in 1977; modified in 1978 and 1979 with
replacement occurring approximately every 6 to 7 months.83
232
-------
TABLE 39. WHEELING-PITTSBURGH STEEL CORP./MON VALLEY PLANT IN MONESSEN, PA
COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
Koppers-Becker^
1942a,b,l
BATTERY DESIGNATION: No.
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
COKE PRODUCTION:d
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):e»f
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM: Baffles86
TYPE OF BAFFLES: Wood86
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. 24
Koppers-Becker^
1,836 (both batteries combined)5
1,332 (both batteries combined)5
No. 1 (serves both batteries)4
Rectangular85
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery No. 1 was rebuilt in 1981.85
^Battery No. 1 originally had 74 ovens; 37 ovens were rebuilt in 1981 which
included conversion from a 3-hole, single collector main to a 4-hole double
collector main battery. The remaining 37 ovens are being converted to a
4-hole, double collector main battery.85
cBattery No. 2 was rebuilt in 1979, which included conversion from a 3-hole,
single collector main to a 4-hole, double collector main battery.2,85
^Production data reflects the original two battery (93 oven) operation.5
eQuench water is considered clean water.2>86
fQuench water is recycled river water.85
233
-------
TABLE 40. WHEELING-PITTSBURGH STEEL CORP./STEUBENVILLE PLANT
IN EAST STEUBENVILLE, WV
COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
No. I11
Koppers2
1917b»87
1978e>2
No. 211
Koppers2
1917c,87
1978e>2
No. 311
Koppers-
Becker2
1917^,87
1978e, 2
No. 811
Koppers2
197687
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
4.400;1 5,205s (all four batteries
combined)
4,310 (all four batteries combined)5
No. 1 or No. 2 (serves No. 3
batteries No. 1, 2, and 3)4>87 (serves
battery
No. 8)4»87
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):f»S
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF BAFFLES:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
Straight-through87
~55387
Baffles87
Wood87
198087
• Quench towers were rebuilt
in 1980 with baffles; no
baffles were used prior to
I96087
Straight-
through87
-55387
Baffles87
Wood87
197687
• Baffles
arranged
at 45°
angles87
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aPlant shut down Battery No. 4 (53 ovens) in 1977, Battery No. 5 (53 ovens)
in 1976, and Battery No. 6 (63 ovens) in 1977.87
bBattery rebuilt in 1955.2>87
cBattery rebuilt in 1953.2»87
dBattery rebuilt in 1964.2»87
elnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2
^All quench towers use water that is considered clean.2
8A11 quench towers use Ohio River water and recirculated water for
quenching.87
234
-------
MATERIAL IN THIS SECTION SUBJECT TO CONFIDENTIALITY o
REVIEW AND IS NOT RELEASABLE AS OF FEBRUARY 1, 1982. Qw
FOR INFORMATION, CONTACT L. KESARI, U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL |o
PROTECTION AGENCY, DIVISION OF STATIONARY SOURCE ENFORCEMENT. o|
jn
o
o
K O
-------
TABLE 1. ALABAMA BY-PRODUCTS CORP./TARRANT COKE PLANT IN TARRANT, AL
COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):b
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF BAFFLES:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. 52
Koppers-
Becker61
19412»61
198061
No. 62
Koppers-
Becker61
1941&1
198061
2,400 (for a four battery operation)^
2,100 (for a four battery operation)^
No. 2 (serves batteries No. 5 and 6)61
Rectangular^»61
1.7609
Baffles9>62
Wood9*62
• Conventional spray system9
• One horizontal row of baffles
inclined 45°9
• Brick tower;height = 17.1 m; outlet
cross-sectional area = 76.6 sq. m
,. _ . i ii • L 'J
(continued)
235
-------
TABLE 1 (continued)
COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):b
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF BAFFLES:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. I;2 A61
Wilputte61
19682'61
197961
See previous
No. 1 (serves battery No.
Rectangular9 > 6^
2,2109
Baffles9.62
Wood9'62
Conventional spray system9
• One horizontal row of baffles
inclined 45°9
• Stainless steel tower; height =
54.5 m; outlet cross-sectional
area = 56.4 sq. m9
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery No. 2 was permanently shut down in Aug. 1979.6^
^Quench water is dirty (recirculated);2>62 11.1% of total quench volume is
process wastewater.^
236
-------
TABLE 2. ALLIED CHEMICAL CORP./ASHLAND PLANT IN ASHLAND, KY
COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):d>e
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF BAFFLES:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. 32
Wllputte2
19532
1973C>2
No. 4a»2
Wilputte2
b
3,480 (both batteries combined)5
2,100 (both batteries combined)5
No. 2 (serves No. 3 (serves
battery No. 3)A»88 battery No. 4)88
Rectangular8"
TDS <100088
Baffles88
Redwood88
197389
• Baffles in a grid-type arrangement
within each tower."
Rectangular8^
TDS <100088
Baffles88
Redwood88
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery No. 4 was shut down in Dec. 1980 due to low coke demand.
bBattery No. 4 was rebuilt in 1978.2
clnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2
^Quench water is considered clean.2
eQuench water acquired from the Ohio River.88
237
-------
TABLE 3. CARONDELET COKE3 IN ST. LOUIS, MO
COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):b
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF BAFFLES:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
A90
C90
Wilputte90 Simon-Carves2 Koppers90
191390 191390 195290
196790 197590 19749
1,000 (all three batteries combined)5
800 (all three batteries combined)5
No. 1 (serves all three batteries)^
Straight-through91
3,000 gal/quench90
Baffles90,91
Wood90,91
196890
• Tower contains three sets of baffles,
inclined 45°90
• Approximately 2 feet of open area appears
at end of baffles90
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aPlant was previously owned by Great Lakes Carbon Corp. prior to Jan. 1981.90
^Quench water is untreated Mississippi River water.90
238
-------
TABLE 4. CHATTANOOGA COKE & CHEMICAL CORP. IN CHATTANOOGA, TN
COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):b>c
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF BAFFLES:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. I2
Semet/Solvay92
19182
I96092
No. 22
Wilputte92
19412
1979a,2
576 (both batteries combined)-*
No. 1 (serves both batteries)^
Rectangular92
TSS < 100 and TDS < 60093
Baffles93
Wood93
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2
bWater quality as stated in the Consent Decree.93
cQuench water is considered clean.2
239
-------
TABLE 5. CITIZENS GAS AND COKE UTILITY IN INDIANAPOLIS, IN
COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:8
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):c
Wilputte2 Koppers2
19462 19412
1,086 (E and H
batteries combined)5
1,002 (E and H
batteries combined)5
No. 1 (serves
batteries E
and H)95
Straight throughb>95
Recirculated TDS
<150095
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm): 10,00097
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM: Baffles95
TYPE OF BAFFLES:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
Wood95
12
Dravo-Still94
19792
1,64595
No. 2 (serves
battery I)95
Straight through;95
Carl Still offset96
Recirculated TDS
<1000;95 TDS - 60096
Baffles97
Wood97
I96095
• Tower equipped with
mist suppressor and
spray wash.95
• "Special" type
baffles installed96
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery F and G, both 40 oven Wilputte batteries which started up in 1926
and 1929 respectively, were shut down in 1979.96
^Currently constructing new tower for Batteries E and H.96
cQuench water is considered clean, composed of cooling tower water and some
recirculated water.2,95
240
-------
TABLE 6. DETROIT COKE CO. IN DETROIT, MI
COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):b
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF BAFFLES:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. 62
Semet/Solvay2
19682>98
1978a»2
2,ISO5
2,0005
No. 44
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2
^Quench water is considered clean.2
241
-------
TABLE 7. DONNER-HANNA COKE CORP. IN BUFFALO, NY
COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
AB2
Koppers2
19512
No. 32
Koppers2
19642
No. 42
Koppers2
19672
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):a
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF BAFFLES:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
3,004 (three batteries combined)5
3,004 (three batteries combined)5
East (serves
battery AB)19
Straight-
through-^
~8,000 gal/
quench19
Baffles19
Wood19
West (serves batteries
No. 3 and 4)19
Straight-through19
~8,000 gal/quench19
Baffles19
Wood19
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aQuench is water considered clean.2,19
242
-------
TABLE 8. EMPIRE COKE CO. IN HOLT, AL
COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:b
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):c»d
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF BAFFLES:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No.
Semet/Solvay67
1906a>67
No. 22
Semet/Solvay67
1906a»67
360 (both batteries combined)*
No. 1 (serves both batteries)^
Straight-through67
Bafflesb»67
Wood67
197467
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBoth batteries were rebuilt in 1978.2
bQuench tower rebuilt in 1974, with baffles.67
cQuench water is considered clean.2
^Quench water consists of recirculated water with fresh water makeup.
243
-------
TABLE 9. MERCIER CORP./ERIE COKE AND CHEMICALS IN PAINESVILLE, OH
COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):b
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF BAFFLES:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. I2
Koppers-Becker2
1926a»100
No. 22
Koppers-Beker2
I926a,100
450 (both batteries combined)5
400 (both batteries combined)5
No. 1 (serves both batteries)^
Straight-through80
TDS = 344-378 (sump outlet)101
Baffles80
Wood80
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery was rebuilt in 1972.2
^Quench water is dirty (recirculated),2>80
244
-------
TABLE 10. INDIANA GAS AND CHEMICAL CORP. IN TERRE HAUTE, IN
COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/1):
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF BAFFLES:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. I2
19192
1978a>2
No. 22
19262
1978a»2
400 (both batteries combined)^
340 (both batteries combined)^
No. 1 (serves both batteries)4
Straight-through102.103
TDS = 342104
Baffles102*103
Wood;102 Redwood103
• Baffles arranged at 45° angle103
• Wooden tower103
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation2
^Quench water is considered clean-21
245
-------
TABLE 11. IRONTON COKE CORP./A SUBSIDIARY OF MCLOUTH STEEL CORP.
IN IRONTON, OH
COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATIONS No. lb>2 No. 2C.2
MANUFACTURER: Semet/Solvay105 Wilputte105
STARTUP DATE: 1917105 1954105
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE: 1947d>105 1978e>105
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY: 2,650 (for a three battery operation)5
TYPICAL TONS/DAY: 2,223 (for a three battery operation)5
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION^ No. 2 (serves both batteries)8»105
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER: Straight-through106.107
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/1): Ohio River water: TDS at intake - 20107
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm): 610 gal/hr/ton of coke107
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM: Baffles106
TYPE OF BAFFLES: Wood106
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION: • Tower constructed of concrete, brick and
steel107
• Tower dimensions—40 ft high, 19 ft x
50 ft at outlet107
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery No. 3 (76 oven-Wilputte) presently shut down.52
^Battery No. 1 operating on a 48-hour coke time to keep ovens hot.52
cBattery No. 2 was shut down between Jan. 1980 and Feb. 1981.
^Involved the addition of ovens.105
elnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2*105
fQuench Station No. 1 (open area operation with no tower) was shut down in
Feb. 1981.105
STower upgraded between 1978-1979.106
246
-------
TABLE 12. JIM WALTER RESOURCES, INC./COKE, IRON AND CHEMICALS DIVISION
IN BIRMINGHAM, AL
COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
No. 32
Koppers2
19522
1979b,61
No. 42
Koppers2
19562
!98ib,61
No. 52
Koppers2
19592
1981b» 61
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:0
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):d>e
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF BAFFLES:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
2,760 (for five battery operation)5
2,400 (for five battery operation)5
No. 2 (serves all three batteries)^
Straight-through61*62
Baffles61.62
Wood61*62
• Baffles arranged laterally61
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery Nos. 1 and 2 were shut down in Aug. 1980.61
^Involved standpipe replacement and topside work.61
cTower was completely rebuilt in Sept. I960.62
^Quench water is recirculated with fresh water makeup.62
eQuench water is considered clean.2
247
-------
TABLE 13. KOPPERS CO., INC./INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS DIVISION,
ERIE PLANT IN ERIE, PA
COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:8
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):c
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF BAFFLES:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
A2
Koppers2
1943b,108
B2
Koppers2
1943b>2
730;! 6255 (both batteries combined)
600 (both batteries combined)5
No. 1 (serves both batteries)^
Straight-through109
Baffles109
Wood109
Early 1970's109
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aFacility previously owned and operated by Interlake, Inc.1
bBoth batteries were rebuilt in 1971.2
cQuench water is considered clean.2,109
248
-------
TABLE 14. KOPPERS CO., INC./INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS DIVISION,
TOLEDO PLANT IN TOLEDO, OH
COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:a
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):b
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF BAFFLES:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
c2.no
Wilputte2
19532,110
8145
7025
No. I4
Straight-through110»11:L
TDS = 437 and TSS = 29112
400 gal/quench110
Baffles111
Wood111
1970110
• Tower dimensions;110
Top inside = 50.5 ft long by
20.5 ft wide
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery C was on hot idle from Sept. 1980 to Aug. 1981111
^Quench water is considered clean.
249
-------
TABLE 15. KOPPERS CO., INC./INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS DIVISION, WOODWARD PLANT
IN WOODWARD, AL
COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:*1 No. I2 No. 4A and 4Bb»113
MANUFACTURER: Koppers2 Koppers2
STARTUP DATE: 197761 194961
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE: 1981°>61
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY: 2,047 (all six batteries combined)5
TYPICAL TONS/DAY: 1,272 (all six batteries combined)5
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION: North (serves batteries No. 1, 4A
and 4B)4>109
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER: Straight-through61*109
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):d
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM: Baffles109
TYPE OF BAFFLES: Wood109
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
(continued)
250
-------
TABLE 15 (continued)
COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):d
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF BAFFLES:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. 2A2 No. 2B2
No. 5b»2
Koppers2 Koppers2 Koppers2
197761 193761 195261
!978c,61 1978c,61
See previous page-*
South (serves all three batteries)^*
Straight-through61'109
Baffles1^
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery No. 3: was permanently shut down in November 1974.61
bBattery Nos. 4A, 4B, and 5 were idling hot for a 14-month period (May 1980-
July 1981) and were rechaged in July 1981.62
clnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.61
dQuench water is dirty (recirculated); 57.6 percent total quench water volume
is process wastewater.2*1^
251
-------
TABLE 16. MILWAUKEE SOLVEY COKE CO./DIVISION OF PICKANDS MATHER AND CO.
IN MILWAUKEE, WI
COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:3
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):b
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:0
No. 32
No. 42
800 (both batteries combined)5
725 (both batteries combined)5
No. 1 (serves both batteries)4
Straight-through114
TDS - 394 and TSS = 398115
53115
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBoth batteries were rebuilt in 1974.2
^Quench water is dirty (recirculated) water.2*114
cNo baffles installed.114
252
-------
TABLE 17. PHILADELPHIA COKE CO., INC. IN PHILADELPHIA, PA
COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION: A/B2
MANUFACTURER: Koppers-Becker116
STARTUP DATE: 19292
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY: 9405
TYPICAL TONS/DAY: 8805
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION: No. I4
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER: Straight-through117
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/1):a Make-up water TDS = 150-300116
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm): 6,000 (avg.)116
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM: Baffles117
TYPE OF BAFFLES: Wood117
DATE INSTALLED: I960117
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aQuench waster is clean water per order of Consent Decree.117
253
-------
TABLE 18. TONAWANDA COKE CORP. IN TONAWANDA, NY
COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):b
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF BAFFLES:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. 218
Wllputte2
19622
East and West19
Straight-through (both towers)19
9,000-10,000 gal/quench (both towers)19
Baffles (within East tower only)c»19
Wood19
197619
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery No. 1 was shut down in June 1972.18
^Quench water is considered clean.2>19
cNo baffles in West tower.19
254
-------
MATERIAL IN THIS SECTION SUBJECT TO CONFIDENTIALITY
REVIEW AND IS NOT RELEASABLE AS OF FEBRUARY 1, 1982.
FOR INFORMATION, CONTACT L. KESARI, U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY, DIVISION OF STATIONARY SOURCE ENFORCEMENT.
o
W td
a pd
o
a
o
EC
H
a
o
-------
REFERENCES
COKE OVEN QUENCHING
1. World Steel Industry Data Handbook. Volume I. United States.
Mc-Graw-Hlll Magazine. 1978. pg. 20-25. (Reliability No. A.)
2. Technical Approach for a Coke Production Cost Model. PEDCo
Environmental, Inc. EPA Contract No. 68-02-3071. Table 3-1 and 3-2.
(Reliability No. 4.)
3. EPA Region V file review by GCA/Technology Division. December 1981.
4. Computer printout. Prepared by PEDCo Environmental, Inc. for U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency. Data compilation of Coke Oven Batteries
in the United States. 1979. (Reliability No. 3.)
5. Development Document for Proposed Effluent Limitations Guidelines and
Standards for the Iron and Steel Manufacturing Point Source Category.
EPA-440/1-79-024a, Vol. II. Draft Report, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Effluent Guidelines Division Office of Water and Waste
Management, Washington, D.C. October 1979. pg. 18-49. (Reliability
No. 4.)
6. Telephone conversation. Ed Luebering, SW District-Ohio EPA to Gene
Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. March 9, 1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
7. Telephone conversation. Steve Samorgin, Southwest District-Ohio
Environmental Protection Agency to Sandy Beaton, GCA/Technology
Division. October 1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
8. EPA Region V files. (Notes by Mr. Harris, Ohio EPA-RE: 1977, Inspection
at ARMCO/Hamilton.)
i
9. Engineering Analysis of Emission Controls Wet Quench Towers. Midwest
Research Institute. MRI Project No. 4369-L(7). Final Report. RACT
510105-510242. (Reliability No. 2.)
10. EPA Region V files. (Letter from C. Kramer-ARMCO Inc. to Region V in
response to Coke Quench Questionnaire by EPA, dated 12/28/78.)
11. Telephone conversation. Bernard Bloom, U.S. EPA, Washington, D.C. to
Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division. November 1980-February 1981.
(Reliability No. 2.)
255
-------
12. Petroccia, M., et al. Assessment of Air Emissions from and Controls for
Iron and Steelmaking Sources. Bethlehem Steel Corp./Burns Harbor-Coke
Plant Evaluation. GCA/Technology Division Report No. TR-80-56-G.
Prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. July 1980.
(Reliability No. 1.)
13. Telephone conversation. Andy Sunderland, Indiana State Board of Health
to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. March 3, 1981. (Reliability
No. 2.)
14. The Impact of New Source Review Policy on Capacity Expansion in the
Integrated Iron & Steel Industry. Prepared by PEDCo Environmentalists,
Inc. Contract No. 68-01-5153. October 1979. (Reliability No. 3.)
15. RACT Box No. 503717-503719. (Reliability No. 1.)
16. Telephone conversation. Bob Clark, PADER-Ebensburg, PA to Sandy Beaton,
GCA/Technology Division. November 1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
17. Telephone conversation. Bob Clark, Pennsylvania Department of
Environmental Resources to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.
March 2, 1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
18. Letter response. Richard Craig. U.S. EPA Region II to William Farino,
GCA/Technology Division. December 1981. (Reliability No. 1.)
19. Telephone conversation. Henry Sandonato, New York Department of
Environmental Conservation to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.
February 17, 1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
20. Telephone conversation. Mark Sylvester, Maryland State Department of
Health and Mental Hygiene to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division.
February 13, 1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
21. Telephone conversation. Ralph Hall, Maryland State Department of Health
and Mental Hygiene to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division. October
29, 1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
22. Letter from J. W. Colbert, General Manager of BSC/Sparrows Point Plant,
Sparrows Point, Maryland, to Stephen Wassusserg, Director of Enforcement
Division, U.S. EPA Region III. RE: Information request subsequent to
EPA inspection of Sparrows Point's air control systems of March 17, 18,
and 27, 1975. Letter dated April 11, 1975. JACA library. (Reliability
No. 3.)
23. Stack Test Report No. 78. Bethlehem Steel Corporation/Sparrows Point,
Maryland. Coke Oven Underfire Stacks. Tests by Maryland Dept. of Health
and Mental Hygiene. 1975. JACA Library. (Reliability No. 1.)
24. Telephone conversation. Dennis Myers, Colorado State Department of
Health to Steve Piper, GCA/Technology Division. February 1981.
(Reliability No. 2.)
256
-------
25. Oliver, J. F. Control of Visible Emissions at CF&I's Coke Plant in
Pueblo, CO. JAPCA. 29(9)):920-925. September 1976. (Reliability
No. 3.)
26. Telephone conversation. Dennis Myers, Colorado State Department of
Health to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division. November 1981.
(Reliability No. 2.)
27. Nunno, T. J., et al. Assessment of Air Emissions from Steel Plant
Sources. Ford Motor Co./River Rouge Coke Plant Inspection.
GCA/Technology Division Report No. TR-81-38-G. Prepared for U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency. April 1981. (Reliability No. 1.)
28. EPA Region V files. (Ford letter response to 114 request by EPA—dated
1/17/79.)
29. EPA Region V files. (EPA-Ford quench water tests—3/14/79.)
30. Air, Water and Inland Steel. Inland Steel Publication. 1979.
(Reliability No. 4.)
31. Telephone conversation. Don Kuh, Indiana State Board of Health to Gene
Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. March 4, 1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
32. EPA Region V files. (Letter from Inland Steel to EPA—August 1981.)
33. Cost Effectiveness Model for Pollution Control of Coke Facilities.
EPA-600/2-79-185. August 1979. Table 8. (Reliability No. 4.)
34. RACT Box No. 509248. (Reliability No. 3.)
35. Patton, R. S. Hooded Coke Quenching System for Air Quality Control.
Iron and Steel Engineer. 50(8):41-47. August 1973. (Reliability No. 3.)
36. Telephone conversation. J. Solkorowski, City of Chicago Department of
Inspectional Services to Marc Grant, GCA/Technology Division. March 5,
1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
37. Telephone conversation. Ken Bowman, Pennsylvania Department of
Environmental Resources—Pittsburgh, PA. to Michael Jasinski,
GCA/Technology Division. February 18, 1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
38. Petroccia, M., et al. Assessment of Air Emissions from and Controls for
Iron and Steelmaking Sources. J&L Steel Corp./Aliquippa Works.
GCA/Technology Division Report No. TR-81-57-G. Prepared for U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency. July 1981. (Reliability No. 1.)
39. Engineering Study of J&L Quench Towers in Aliquippa, PA and Campbell,
OH. November 6, 1980. (Reliability No. 1.)
257
-------
40. Telephone conversation. Ted Davis, Northeast District-Ohio EPA to Gene
Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. February 27, 1981. (Reliability
No. 2.)
41. EPA Region V files. (J&L Steel Corp. letter to EPA—April 1978.)
42. Telephone conversation. Ed Wojciechowski, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency-Region V to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. February 4,
1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
43. EPA Region V files. (J&L Steel Corp. letter to EPA—1981.)
44. Telephone conversation. S. Banninthaya, Allegheny County Health
Department to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. February 25, 1981.
(Reliability No. 2.)
45. Spawn, P. and R. Li. Assessment of Air Emissions from and Controls for
Iron and Steelmaking Operations. Kaiser Steel Corp./Fontana Works Coke
Plant. GCA/Technology Division Report No. TR-79-53-G. Prepared for U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency. December 1980. (Reliability No. 1.)
46. Telephone conversation. Lois Green, U.S. EPA Region IX to Michael
Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division. November 1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
47. Telephone conversation. Norm Ernstein, South Coast Air Quality
Management District to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. February
25, 1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
48. Telephone conversation. Robert Bean, South Coast Air Quality Management
District to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division. October 1981.
(Reliability No. 2.)
49. Telephone conversation. Tom Blair, Radian Corp. in Austin, Texas to Gene
Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. March 3, 1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
50. EPA Region V files. (National Steel Corp./Great Lakes Steel Division.
response to EPA questionnaire—dated 2/21/78.)
51. EPA Region V files. (Data supplied by National Steel Corp./Great Lakes
Steel Division to EPA.)
52. EPA Region V engineers comments to GCA/Technology Division
questionnaire. December 1981.
53. EPA Region V files. (Region V calculations made on 8/1/79 for National
Steel Corp./Great Lakes Steel Division.)
54. Telephone conversation. Anton Telford, Illinois Environmental Protection
Agency to Sandy Beaton, GCA/Technology Division. October 1981.
(Reliability No. 2.)
258
-------
55. EPA Region V files. (State permits for National Steel Corp./Granite City
Steel Division.)
56. Formadley, R. J. Granite City: Bold Modernization of an Integrated
Steel Plant. Iron and Steel Engineer. August 1980. pp. SL-67-SL-80.
(Reliability No. 3.)
57. Spawn, P., et al. Assessment of Air Emissions from and Controls for Iron
and Steelmaking Sources. National Steel Corp./Weirton Steel
Division—Plant Inspection. GCA/Technology Division Report No.
TR-81-118-G. Prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
November 1981. (Reliability No. 1.)
58. Telephone conversation. John Raggi, West Virginia Air Pollution Control
Commission to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. February 17, 1981.
(Reliability No. 2.)
59. Stationary Source Sampling Report on Particulate Emission Testing of Coke
Quench Tower Stack-Battery No. 8. National Steel Corp./Weirton Steel.
Sept. 1980 report. Entropy Environmentalists, Inc. JACA Library.
(Reliability No. 1.)
60. Ferrous Metallurgical Processes Review. EPA Publication. Vol. 2,
No. 1. September 1980. p. 1-3. (Reliability No. 4.)
61. Letter response. Paul Pate, Director of Jefferson County Department of
Health to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division. December 1981.
(Reliability No. 1.)
62. Telephone conversation. Veda Hampton, Jefferson County Department of
Health to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. February 25, 1981.
(Reliability No. 2.)
63. EPA Region V files. (Arthur D. Little report on a new battery at
RSC/Chicago—1978.)
64. EPA Region V files. (Republic Steel Corp. petition for variance with
EPA--1974.)
65. Letter response. Gary Nied, Cleveland Division of Air Pollution Control
to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. March 9, 1981. (Reliability
No. 1.)
66. Telephone conversation. Mr. Habib, Cleveland Division of Air Pollution
Control to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. February 27, 1981.
(Reliability No. 2.)
67. Telephone conversation. Sue Robertson, State of Alabama Air Pollution
Control Division to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division. October
27, 1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
259
-------
68. Telephone conversation. A. Pasko, Canton City Health Department to Gene
Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. March 5, 1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
69. Letter response. Andy Pasko, Canton City Health Department to Sandy
Beaton, GCA/Technology Division. October 1981. (Reliability No. 1.)
70. EPA Region V files. (Trip report by Dan Bakk—2/20-80.)
71. Letter response. Dennis Bush, Northeast District-Ohio EPA to Sandy
Beaton, GCA/Technology Division. October 1981. (Reliability No. 1.)
72. Spawn, P., et al. USSC/Clairton Works Coke Plant in Clairton, PA.
GCA/Technology Division Report No. TR-80-30-G. Prepared for U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency. April 1980. (Reliability No. 1.)
73. Spawn, P., et al. Assessment of Air Emissions from and Controls for Iron
and Steelmaking Sources. United States Steel Corp./Fairfield Works Coke
Plant. GCA/Technology Division Report No. TR-79-59-G. Prepared for U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency. November 1980. (Reliability No. 1.)
74. Coke Battery Survey Procedures, Description and Data Presentations.
USSC/Fairfield Works in Fairfield, Alabama. EPA-330-1-77-012. Dec.
1977. RACT 501519 [start]. (Reliability No. 1.)
75. Telephone conversation and letter response. Tom McGinley, PADER-
Morristown, PA to Sandy Beaton, GCA/Technology Division. November 1981.
(Reliability No. 1.)
76. Report on emissions tests conducted on Quench Towers No. 3 and No. 5 and
Quench Tower Air Quality Impact Modelng at U.S. Steel Corp./Gary Works in
Gary, Indiana. Volumes I and II. RACT No. 508889-509247. (Reliability
No. 1.)
77. EPA Region V files. (Letter from State of Ind.—EPA to United States
Steel Corp./Gary Works—Oct. 1981.)
78. EPA Region V files. (Letter from United States Steel Corp./Gary Works to
EPA-1978.)
79. EPA Region V files. (U.S. Steel Corp./Gary Works response to EPA
interrogatory—1979.)
80. Telephone conversation. Dennis Bush, Ohio Northeast District Air
Pollution Control Board to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.
February 27, 1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
81. Laube, A. H. and B. A. Dummond. Coke Quench Tower Emission Testing
Program. EPA-600/2-79-082. York Research Corp. April 1979.
(Reliability No. 1.)
260
-------
82. National Enforcement Investigation Center. Report on Plant Inspection at
United States Steel Corp./Geneva Works. 1979. (Reliability No. 2.)
83. Letters from Steve Piper, GCA/Technology Division to Connally Hears, U.S.
EPA Region VIII. Coke Quench Tower Inspection at United States Steel
Corp./Geneva Works. Letters dated October 21, 1981 and November 11,
1981. (Reliability No. 1.)
84. Telephone conversation. Mr. Kopta, Utah State Division of Environmental
Health to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. February 27, 1981.
(Reliability No. 2.)
85. Letter response. Richard Thomas, PADER-Greensburg, PA to Sandy Beaton,
GCA/Technology Division. December 1981. (Reliability No. 1.)
86. Telephone conversation. Tony Johnson, Pennsylvania Department of
Environmental Resources to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.
February 26, 1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
87. Letter response. John Raggi, West Virginia Air Pollution Control
Commission to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division. November 1981.
(Reliability No. 1.)
88. Letter response. James W. Dills, Commonwealth of Kentucky Department for
Natural Resources and Environmental Protection to Michael Jasinski,
GCA/Technology Division. March 2, 1981. (Reliability No. 1.)
89. Letter response. James Dills, Commonwealth of Kentucky Department of
Health to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division. November 1981.
(Reliability No. 1.)
90. Letter response. Richard Knapp, City of St. Louis Department of Health
to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division. November 1981.
(Reliability No. 1.)
91. Telephone conversation. Richard Knapp, City of St. Louis Department of
Health to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. February 24, 1981.
(Reliability No. 2.) .
92. Telephone conversation. Harvey Rice, Chattanooga Air Pollution Control
Bureau to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division. October 26, 1981.
(Reliability No. 2.)
93. Telephone conversation. Harvey Rice, Chattanooga Air Pollution Control
Bureau to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division. February 18, 1981.
(Reliability No. 2.)
94. Fabric Filter Newsletter. Mcllvanie Inc. No. 56. June 10, 1980.
pg. 5. (Reliability No. 4.)
261
-------
95. Telephone conversation. Dave Jordan, Indianapolis Air Pollution Control
Board to Gene Bergsori, GCA/Technology Division. March 4, 1981.
(Reliability No. 2.)
96. EPA Region V files. (EPA Inspection at Citizens Gas and Coke—April
1981.)
97. Telephone conversation. Dave Jordan, Indianapolis Air Pollution Control
Board to Sandy Beaton, GCA/Technology Division. October 1981.
(Reliability No. 2.)
98. EPA Region V files. (Detroit Coke.)
99. Telephone conversation. Sue Robertson, Alabama Air Pollution Control
State Agency to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. February 25,
1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
100. EPA Region V files. (Consent Decree dated 2/5/79—Exhibit No. 2.)
101. EPA Region V files. (Letter from Ohio EPA to Region V dated 8/1A-80.)
102. Telephone conversation. George Karp, Vigo County Air Pollution Control
and Ken Kearney, Indiana State Air Pollution Control Agency to Gene
Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. March 4, 1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
103. EPA Region V files. (Trip Report by Phil Pekron—EPA in 1979.)
j.04. EPA Region V files. (Sample by EPA on May 28, 1980 at Indiana Gas.)
105. EPA Region V files. (Company Progress Report to Region V—May 1981.)
106. Telephone conversation. Frank Phillips, Portsmouth City Health
Department to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. February 27, 1981.
(Reliability No. 2.)
107. EPA Region V files. (Letter dated 12/11/78 in response to EPA
questionnaire.)
108. RACT Box No. 503715-503716. (Reliability No. 1.)
109. Telephone conversation. Larry Wonders, Pennsylvania Department of
Environmental Resources to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.
February 26, 1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
110. EPA Region V files. (Permit application.)
111. Telephone conversation. Tom Doktor, Toledo Air Pollution Agency to Gene
Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. February 27, 1981. (Reliability
No. 2.)
262
-------
112. EPA Region V files. (Letter from Ohio EPA to U.S. EPA Region V—July
1979.)
113. Jasinski, M. R. Field Inspection Report of Major Air Point Source
Facilities in Region IV. Koppers, Co., Inc. in Woodward, AL.
CCA/Technology Division. July 8, 9, 1980. (Reliability No. 1.)
114. Telephone conversation. Jerry Bevington, Wisconsin Department of Natural
Resources to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. March 9, 1981.
(Reliability No. 2.)
115. EPA Region V files. (EPA quench water tests at Milwaukee Solvay—May
1980.)
116. Letter response. Norm Glazer, City of Philadelphia Air Management to
Sandy Beaton, GCA/Technology Division. November 1981. (Reliability
No. 1.)
117. Telephone conversation. Robert King, Director of Enforcement for
Philadelphia Air Management to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.
February 13, 1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
263
-------
MATERIAL IN THIS SECTION SUBJECT TO CONFIDENTIALITY
REVIEW AND IS NOT RELEASABLE AS OF FEBRUARY 1, 1982.
FOR INFORMATION, CONTACT L. KESARI, U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY, DIVISION OF STATIONARY SOURCE ENFORCEMENT.
-------
TABLE 1. ARMCO INC./HAMILTON PLANT IN HAMILTON, OH
COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE: .
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:
No. I1 No. 21 No. 31 No. 41
Koppers-Beckers (all four batteries)
1927a'3 19381 1941* 19471
1976b,2
i978b»2
45l
12-51
43-01
Gun-
flue1
12-51
43-01
Under-
jetl
12-51
40-81
Under-
jet—
12-51
40-81
Under-
jet—
Recircu- Recircu-
lation-'- lation-'-
TYPE OF FUEL USED:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
COG (all four batteries)^
1,930 (all four batteries combined)5
1,811 (all four batteries combined)5
Common dry ESP serves batteries No. 2,
3, and 46>7
19816'7
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery was rebuilt in 1961.1
^Involved end-flue rehabilitation.
264
-------
TABLE 2. ARMCO INC./HOUSTON WORKS IN HOUSTON, TX
COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:3
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:
TYPE OF FUEL USED:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
No. I
Koppers -Becker2
19432,8
19762
No. 21
Kopper B -Becker2
19531'8
19772
47l>8
13-131
40-111
13-131
40-111
Under jet1*8
Natural Gas8
Underjet1*8
Natural Gas
8
1,045 (both batteries combined)^
840 (both batteries combined)^
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM: Dry ESP8
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
Precipitair9
19768
• Design inlet
flow rate =
75,000 acfm8
• ESP contains
3 fields; 3
cells; 29 gas
passages; SCA
543 sq ft/
1,000 acfm;
round-wire
discharge
electrodes8
• Test Data
(1976);9"
Inlet—70,400-
71,200 acfm
(range)
404-429°F
(range)
Dry ESP8
Precipitair9
19768
• Design inlet
flow rate =
25,000 acfm8
• ESP contains
3 fields; 3
cells; 18 gas
passages; SCA
583 sq ft/
1,000 acfm;
round-wire
discharge
electrodes8
• Test Data
(1976);°
Inlet—16,000-
17,178 acfm
(range)
414-443°F
(range)
(continued)
265
-------
TABLE 2 (continued)
COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
Outlet—66,300-
71,800 acfm
(range)
363-389°F
(range)
Outlet—17,100-
17,600 acfm
(range)
380-382°F
(range)
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.
266
-------
TABLE 3. ARMCO INC./MIDDLETOWN WORKS IN MIDDLETOWN, OH
COKE PLANT NO. 2 COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS
AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION: No. I1
MANUFACTURER: Wilputte1
STARTUP DATE: 19532>10
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS: 761
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.): 13-61
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.): 43-91
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM: Underjet-Recirculation1
TYPE OF FUEL USED: COG (desulfurized)4
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY: 5,150 (Coke Plants No. 2 and 3
c ombined ) ->
TYPICAL TONS/DAY: 4,890 (Coke Plants No. 2 and 3
combined) •*
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
267
-------
TABLE 4. ARMCO INC./MIDDLETOWN WORKS IN MIDDLETOWN, OH
COKE PLANT NO. 3 COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS
AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:
TYPE OF FUEL USED:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
No. I1
Dravo-Still1
19 7 61
No. 21
Dravo-Still1
19771
57!
19-81
52-61
Multistage
combustion,
Gun-flue1
57l
19-81
52-61
Multistage
combustion,
Gun-flue1
COG
COG
(desulfurized)^ (desulfurized)^
See previous page-*
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
268
-------
TABLE 5. BETHLEHEM STEEL CORP./BETHLEHEM PLANT IN BETHLEHEM, PA
COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION: 2A2 2B2 3A2
MANUFACTURER: Koppers-Becker (all three
batteries)2
STARTUP DATE: 19412 19412 19422
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS: 102b>1 W2C>1
OVEN HEIGHT (m): 32 32
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM: Gun- Gun- Gun-
flue1'2 flue1'2 flue1'2
TYPE OF FUEL USED: COG^11'13 COG13 COG13
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY: 5,840 (all six batteries combined)5
TYPICAL TONS/DAY: 5,058 (all six batteries combined)5
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
(continued)
269
-------
TABLE 5 (continued)
COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in. ):
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:
TYPE OF FUEL USED:
3B2
Koppers-
Becker
19422
32
Gun-
flue1'2
COG13
52,11
Koppers-
Becker
1953a»2
8Q2.U
42,11
Gun-
flue1*2
COG11.13
A2
McKee-Otto2
19762
802
62
Under jet1'2
COG13
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
See previous page'
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery 5 rebuilt in 1977.12
bBattery 2A and 2B combined.1
cBattery 3A and 3B combined.5
dDesulfurized COG used.11*13
270
-------
TABLE 6. BETHLEHEM STEEL CORP./BURNS HARBOR PLANT IN CHESTERTON, IN
COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in. ):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
No. I1
Wilputte1
19 6914
1980s >15
1982b,15
821
20-514
50-71*
No. 21
Koppers1
197214
821
20-514
50-714
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM: Underjet1 Underjet1
TYPE OF FUEL USED: Desulfurized COG and blast furnace
gas (both batteries)15
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY: 6,670 (both batteries combined)5
TYPICAL TONS/DAY: 5,179 (both batteries combined)5
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
alnvolved changing steam nozzles, i.e., increasing aspiration, and rebuilding
battery top.15
"Scheduled shutdown for rebuild, i.e., double collector mains to be
installed.15
271
-------
TABLE 7. BETHLEHEM STEEL CORP./JOHNSTOWN PLANT IN JOHNSTOWN, PA
COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3»b No. 182
MANUFACTURER: Koppers2 >16
STARTUP DATE: 195116>17
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE: 198216>18
NO. OF OVENS: 772»16
OVEN HEIGHT (m): 3.5;19 42
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM: Indirect firing19
TYPE OF FUEL USED: COGC>17
COKE PRODUCTION:d
RATED TONS/DAY: 3,500 (for three battery operation)5
TYPICAL TONS/DAY: 3,028 (for three battery operation)5
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery No. 18 located in the Franklin Plant. Battery Nos. 17 and 19
(total—151 ovens), also in the Franklin Plant, were shut down in 1977.^
^Johnstown facility also contained Battery Nos. 15 and 16 (total—88 ovens),
designated as the Rosedale Plant, shut down in 1977 due to flood.16
Approximately 8,000 Mcf/day used.17
^Production data for Franklin Plant prior to shut down of Battery Nos. 17
and 19.5
272
-------
TABLE 8. BETHLEHEM STEEL CORP./LACKAWANNA PLANT IN LACKAWANNA, NY
COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3 No. 71 No. 81 No. 91
MANUFACTURER: Wilputte2 Wilputte2 Wilputte2
STARTUP DATE: 19522 1961b>20 19692
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE: 1982C>20
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS: 762»21 762>21 762»21
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.): 12-221 12-221 20-421
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.): 40-721 40-721 48-321
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM: Underjet (all three batteries)22
TYPE OF FUEL USED: Desulfurized COG (all three batteries)20
COKE PRODUCTION:01
RATED TONS/DAY: 8,140 (for seven battery operation)5
TYPICAL TONS/DAY: 6,908 (for seven battery operation)5
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBatterles No. 3, 4, 5 and 6 were shut down in 1977.20,21
bBattery was completely rebuilt in I960.20
cScheduled shut down for rebuild.20
"Production data reflects operation of Battery Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8,
and 9.5
273
-------
TABLE 9. BETHLEHEM STEEL CORP./SPARROWS POINT PLANT IN SPARROWS POINT, MD
COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATIONS
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
OVEN LENGTH (ft-In.):
No. I2
Koppers2
I9602
1985b,23
632
32
43-01
No. 22
f\
Koppers''
19612
1985b,23
602
32
43-01
No. 32
Koppers2
19512
1982c,18
632
32
43-01
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:
TYPE OF FUEL USED:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
Gun-type2-* Gun-type2^ Gun-type2^
5,500 (all eight batteries
combined)2^
(continued)
274
-------
TABLE 9 (continued)
COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
No. 42
Koppers2
19782
198 5b>23
"
43-01
No. 52
Koppers2
19782
1985b,23
632
32
43-02
No. 62
Koppers2
19532
1982c,18
32
43-02
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:
TYPE OF FUEL USED:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
Gun-type2^
See previous
(continued)
275
-------
TABLE 9 (continued)
COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:
TYPE OF FUEL USED:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
No. II2
Koppers-Becker
19552 19572
No. 122
2 Koppers-Becker2
652
42
43-01
Underjet1
COG25
652
42
43-01
Underjetl
COG25
See previous page2^
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery Nos. 9 and 10 were shut down in early 1981.
Battery "A" to startup in December 1981; new Battery "B" scheduled to
startup in December 1985 will replace Battery Nos. 1, 2, 4, and 5.2^
cPlant has the option to either shut down battery Nos. 3 and 6 in 1982,
or continue their operation until 1985.
276
-------
TABLE 10. CF&I STEEL CORP./PUEBLO PLANT IN PUEBLO, CO
COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
Bl
Koppers2
13-027
43-227
d
Koppers2
19742>26
13-027
43-227
Dl
Koppers-
n
Becker
I9602
1974a>2
13-027
43-227
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM: Gun-flue (all three batteries)1
TYPE OF FUEL USED: COG (all three batteries)28
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation, and conversion from single to double
collector mains.2»26
277
-------
TABLE 11. FORD MOTOR CO./RIVER ROUGE PLANT IN DEARBORN, MI
COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:8 A1 Ax1
MANUFACTURER: Koppers- Wilputte2'29
Becker2'29
STARTUP DATE: 1937b>1 197230
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE: 1979C>2
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS: 451 131
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.): 13-31 13-31
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.): 40-41 40-41
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM: Underjet1'29 Double-divided,
gun-f
TYPE OF FUEL USED: COG or enriched BFG (both
batteries)30
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY: 4,340 (all five batteries combined)5
TYPICAL TONS/DAY: 3,945 (all five batteries combined)5
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
.d
(continued)
278
-------
TABLE 11 (continued)
COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE: .
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-ln.):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:
DxJ
Koppers-Becker (all three batteries)2'29
19376,1 1939^1- 19631
1979C»2 1977C>2
251
13-31
40-41
Gun
611
13-31
40-41
Gun-
flue1'29
611
13-31
40-41
Gun-
flue1'29
TYPE OF FUEL USED:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
COG or enriched BFG (all three
batteries)30
See previous
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED: .
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
ESP (serves
Battery C)31
Precipitair31
198131
• Design flow
rate 99,475-
109,000 acfm
at 480-550°F31
• Flow rate
from coke
oven flues =
55,000 scfm;
gas temp. =
550°F31
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery D pushed empty in 1972.30
^Battery rebuilt in 1964; 16 ovens have been hot and empty since 1964.
clnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2
"Batteries "A" and Ax share a common combustion stack.29
eBattery rebuilt in 1962.1
fBattery rebuilt in 1963.1
279
-------
TABLE 12. INLAND STEEL CO./INDIANA HARBOR WORKS IN E. CHICAGO, IN
COKE PLANT NO. 2 COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS
AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION: No. 61 No. 71 No. 81
MANUFACTURER: Koppers-Becker (all three batteries)2
STARTUP DATE: 19501 19561 19581
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE: 1971a>2 1974a»2
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS: 651 871 871
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.): 12-01 12-01 12-01
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.): 37-71 37-71 37-71
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM: Underjet1 Underjet1 Gun-flue1
TYPE OF FUEL USED: COG (all three batteries)32
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY: 6,170 (all five batteries combined)5
TYPICAL TONS/DAY: 5,640 (all five batteries combined)5
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM: Separate, identical ESP serves each
7 ^
combustion stack'>J-)
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED: 1980 (all three units)7
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION: • Design flow rate = 135,000 acfm
(each ESP)33
(continued)
280
-------
TABLE 12 (continued)
COKE PLANT NO. 2 COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS
AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION: No. 91 No. 101
MANUFACTURER: Koppers-Becker (both batteries)2
i-TATJrUP DATE: 19591 19701
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS: 871 511
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.): 12-01 20-01
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.): 37-71 37-41
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM: Gun-flue1 Low differential,
underjet
TYPE OF FUEL USED: COG (both batteries)32
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY: See previous page5
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:b
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2
bESP to be installed on Battery No. 9 by 1985, by Consent Decree.
281
-------
TABLE 13. INLAND STEEL CO./INDIANA HARBOR WORKS IN E. CHICAGO, IN
COKE PLANTS NO. 3a AND 4b COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S)
PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in. ):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:
TYPE OF FUEL USED:
c1
Koppers2
19741'34
1979C«34
561.34
20-21
47-111
Underjet1
COG32
No. II1
Koppers2
19781'34
69L3A
20-21
47-111
Underjet1
COG and BFG32
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:d
2,500 (Battery
C)5
1,562 (Battery
C)5
3,014 (Battery
No. II)5
2,740 (Battery
No. II)5
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery C.1
bBattery No. II.1
clnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.'
dESP to be installed on Battery C by 1982, by Consent Decree.7
282
-------
TABLE 14. INTERLAKE INC./RIVERDALE PLANT IN CHICAGO, IL
COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in. ):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:
TYPE OF FUEL USED:
No. I2
Wilputte1
1956;2 19571
igyga, 2, 35
502'36
12-81
40-81
Underjet1
COG37
No. 22
Wilputte1
19571
19791'2*35
502,36
12 -81
40-81
Under jet1
COG37
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY: 1.850;1 1,7405 (both batteries
combined)
TYPICAL TONS/DAY: 1,460 (both batteries combined)5
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2
283
-------
TABLE 15. JONES & LAUGHLIN STEEL CORP./ALIQUIPPA WORKS IN ALIQUIPPA, PA
COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3 A-l1 A-5b>1
MANUFACTURER: Koppers-Becker2 Koppers2
STARTUP DATE: 19451 19762'38
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE: 197839
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS: 1061 561
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.): 13-01 20-61
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.): 40-51 50-71
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM: Underjet1'40 Twin-flue,
underjet0*1*40
TYPE OF FUEL USED: COG39 COGd>41
COKE PRODUCTION:6
RATED TONS/DAY: 4,308 (both batteries combined)39
TYPICAL TONS/DAY: 3,500 (both batteries combined)40
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBatteries A-3 and A-4 were shut down in I960.39
^Battery A-5 replaced Battery A-2 in 1975-1976.40
C16 twin flues per oven.41
Approximately 509,000 cfm of COG used.41
eProduction data for four battery operation (A-l, A-3, A-4, and A-5) =
6,946 (rated tons/day); 4,506 (typical tons/day).5
284
-------
TABLE 16. JONES & LAUGHLIN STEEL CORP./CAMPBELL WORKS IN CAMPBELL, OH
COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:*1
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in. ):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-ln. ):
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:
TYPE OF FUEL USED:
No. 71
Wilputte1
19542
76*
13-01
43-01
Underjet1
COG42
No. 91
Wilputte1
19582
76*
13-01
43-01
Under jet-'-
COG42
COKE PRODUCTION:15
RATED TONS/DAY: 4.000;1 3.1865 (for three
battery operation)
TYPICAL TONS/DAY: 3,483 (for three battery operation)5
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery No. 8 shut down on June 5, 1980.^2
^Production data reflects operation of battery Nos. 7, 8, and 9.
285
-------
TABLE 17. JONES & LAUGHLIN STEEL CORP./INDIANA HARBOR
WORKS IN E. CHICAGO, IN
COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:
TYPE OF FUEL USED:
COKE PRODUCTION:0
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
No. 41
Koppers-Beckerl
19562,43
No. 91
Koppers-Beckerl
19611'44
1979b»2
75!
13-01
40-643
87l
13-01
40-643
Underjet1'43
COG43»44
Underjet1'43
COG43*44
4.050;1 4.0005 (for three
battery operation)
3,406 (for three battery operation)-*
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery No. 3 permanently shut down.44
"Involved end-flue rehabilitation.^>44
cProduction data reflects operation of battery Nos. 3, 4, and 9.
286
-------
TABLE 18. JONES & LAUGHLIN STEEL CORP./PITTSBURGH WORKS IN PITTSBURGH, PA
COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
[ON DATE:
DATE:
Pii
Wilputte2
I9601
197945
591
13-01
40-91
P21
Wilputte2
19611
1977a>2
591
13-01
40-91
P3N1
Wilputte2
19611
WSO3*45
13-01
40-9 1
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITAT
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM: Gun-flue1
TYPE OF FUEL USED: COG (all three batteries)45
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY: 5,300 (all five batteries combined)5
TYPICAL TONS/DAY: 5,230 (all five batteries combined)5
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
(continued)
287
-------
TABLE 18 (continued)
COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in. ):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:
TYPE OF FUEL USED:
COKE PRODUCTION:
P3S1
Wilputte2
19611
1978a>2
591
13-01
40-91
Gun-f lue
COG
P41
Koppers-Becker2
19531
I977a>2
79l
13 -O1
40-61
Underjet1
COG
RATED TONS/DAY: See previous page5
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2
288
-------
TABLE 19. KAISER STEEL CORP./FONTANA WORKS IN FONTANA, CA
COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:3
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:
TYPE OF FUEL USED:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
BJ
o
Koppers-Becker
19422,A6
197347
Koppers-Becker^
194246>47
197347
45!. V
13-047
40-5 4 7
Underjet-*-
COG47
451 >47
13-047
40-547
Underjet-*-
COGC>47
4.250;1 4,1005 (all seven
batteries combined)
3,800 (all seven batteries combined)5
Individual
baghouse48
I96048
• Baghouse
rebagged in
in December
I96048
Individual
baghouse4"
AAF50
197948
t Five module
baghouse with
design A/C •=
1.5:l50
• Reverse air
cleaning5"
• Test Data
79,044-79,219
acfm (range)
407-415 °F (range)
(continued)
289
-------
TABLE 19 (continued)
COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
19492'46
19763'47
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:a
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.)'
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:
TYPE OF FUEL USED:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM: Individual
baghouse"
Koppers-Becker^ Koppers-Beckei™
13 -O47
40-547
Under j et-'-
COGC»47»51
COG
See previous page-'-'-'
195246,47
1979-1980b'47
451,47
13-047
40-547
Underjet1
BFG:51 BFG and
3 2
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
AAF53
197953
• Design flow
rate = 56,000
acfm with one
400-hp I.D. fan
• A/C (design) =
1.5:1 with
total of 840
"silicon-
graphite"
treated fiber-
glass bags-*3
• Reverse Air
cleaning5
• Test Data
(1979);53"
36,844-37,268
dscfm
Individual
baghouse54
AAF54
197854
• Design flow
rate = 100,800
acfm with one
500-hp I.D. fan54
• A/C (design) =
2:1 with total
of 1,080
"silicon-
graphite"
treated fiber-
glass bags-*4
• Reverse air
cleaning-'4
(continued)
290
-------
TABLE 19 (continued)
COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:a
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:
TYPE OF FUEL USED:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
F1
Koppers-
Becker2
195246,47
1978b«2
451,47
13-047
40-547
Under jet1
BFGd > 51
Koppers-
Becker2
195846,47
451,47
13-047
40-547
Gun-flue1
COG55
Koppers-
Becker2
195846,47
451,47
13-047
40-547
Gun-flue1
BFG and
COG55
See previous pages1>
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM: Individual
baghouse
Separate, but identical
baghouse per combustion
stack-* 5
MANUFACTURER: AAF46
DATE INSTALLED: 197946
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION: • Design
flow rate
- 100,800
acfm with
one 500-
hp I.D.
fan46
• A/C
(design) =
2:1 with
total of
1,080
"silicon-
graphite"
Buell/Envirotech55
197948
• Each baghouse rated
at 118,000 acfm at
450°F with one 500~hp
I.D. fan55
• Each baghouse design
A/C = 2.1:1 with
total of 1,140
"silicon-graphite"
treated fiberglass
bags^5
• Common manifold to
single stack
exhaust ^ •*
(continued)
291
-------
TABLE 19 (continued)
COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
treated
fiberglass
bags45
• Reverse air
cleaning
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aInvolved trimwork.4'
^Involved end-flue rehabilitation.2>47
Approximately 110-165 x 10^ cu ft per hour used.53
^Approximately 14 x 10" cu ft per hour used.4"
292
-------
TABLE 20. LONE STAR STEEL CO. IN LONE STAR, TX
COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:a C2
MANUFACTURER: Koppers2
STARTUP DATE: 19792
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS: 702
OVEN HEIGHT (m): 52
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM: Underjet1
TYPE OF FUEL USED: COG56
COKE PRODUCTION:13
RATED TONS/DAY: 1.2145
TYPICAL TONS/DAY: 6905
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:0
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBatteries A and B (total—78 ovens) were shut down in 1979.57
^Production data appears to be for the old batteries.5
C01d batteries A and B used an ESP (installed approximately 1972-1975, and
manufactured by "Precipitair") for combustion stack control.57*58
293
-------
TABLE 21. NATIONAL STEEL CORP./GREAT LAKES STEEL DIVISION IN ECORSE, MI
COKE PLANT NO. 2 COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS
AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in. ):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
No. 31
Wilputte1*59
19542>59
1982b>7
70l
13-21
40-81
No. 41
Wilputte1'59
19562«59
19743, 60
781
13-21
40-81
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:
TYPE OF FUEL USED:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
Underjet, 4- Underjet, 4-
divided1.59 divided1'59
BFG and COG59 BFG and COG59
2,500 (both batteries combined)5
2,500 (both batteries combined)5
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.^
^Scheduled shut down for rebuild, with startup in 1985.
294
-------
TABLE 22. NATIONAL STEEL CORP./GREAT LAKES STEEL DIVISION IN ECORSE, MI
COKE PLANT NO. 3 COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS
AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:
TYPE OF FUEL USED:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
No. 51
Otto1'59
1970L59
851.59
20-51
50-759
Underjet, twin-flue1*59
BFG and COG59
3,412;59 2,900s
2,7005
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
295
-------
TABLE 23. NATIONAL STEEL CORP./GRANITE CITY STEEL DIVISION
IN GRANITE CITY, IL
COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:21
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in. ):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:
TYPE OF FUEL USED:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:0
Ab,61
McKee-Otto61
198061
4561
14-061
40-661
61
COG
760-85361
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aPlant formerly operated Batteries B and C which contained 49 and 61 ovens,
respectively. These batteries are currently being rebuilt similar to
Battery "A" and will contain 45 and 47 ovens, respectively."^
"This battery replaced a similar type Koppers-Becker battery containing 27
ovens.
cBattery C combustion stack formerly controlled by ESP manufactured by
United McGill (installed in 1979) with following specifications:62
© Design flow rate = 92,000 acfm
® Design SCA •= 895 ft2/!,000 acfm
« ESP divided into 3 units operating in parallel.
e Each unit/4 fields.
296
-------
TABLE 24. NATIONAL STEEL CORP./WEIRTON STEEL DIVISION IN WEIRTON, WV
COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:
TYPE OF FUEL USED:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
M-71
Koppers-
Becker2
19511
1 Q Q O n 1 1
j. -7 O ^
611
13-21
40-91
Under-
M-81
Koppers-
Becker2
195363,.
1979b,64
All
13-21
40-663
Under-
jetl.64
I-l1
Koppers2
19731
1979C>2
20-4 63
47-363
Under-
jetl.64
Combination of desulfurized COG and
BFG (for all batteries)64
4,500 (for four bat-
tery operation)"'^
4,066 (for four bat-
tery operation)** »^
3,600 (battery
1-1)5
3,000 (battery
1-1)5
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBatteries M-5 and M-6 (total of 106 ovens) were shut down in September-
October 1980.63»64
"Involved end-wall rehabilitation."4
clnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2
^Production data for the "mainland" reflects a four battery operation
(M-5, M-6, M-7, and M-8).5'64
297
-------
TABLE 25. REPUBLIC STEEL CORP./SOUTHERN STEEL DISTRICT, THOMAS WORKS
IN BIRMINGHAM, AL
COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:
TYPE OF FUEL USED:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. I
Koppers
1941a>1
1981b,65
13-01
40-01
Underjet]
COG65
1.066;5 9501
5605
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery was rebuilt in 1969.2
^Involved end-flue rehabilitation.^
298
-------
TABLE 26. REPUBLIC STEEL CORP./CHICAGO DISTRICT IN CHICAGO, IL
COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION: No. I1
.MANUFACTURER: Wilputte1'66
STARTUP DATE: 19432>66
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE: 1981a>18>66
NO. OF OVENS: 751'66
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-In.): 13-01
OVEN LENGTH (ft-In.): 42-766
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM: Underjet1>66
TYPE OF FUEL USED: COG and BFG66
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY: 1.369;5 1.2001
TYPICAL TONS/DAY: 1,3005
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery No. 1 will be replaced (late 1981) by Battery No. 2 containing 60
ovens, 6-m high, double collector mains, 4 charge holes, automatic lid
lifters, using stage charging and rated at 1,800 tons of coke per day.*>6
299
-------
TABLE 27. REPUBLIC STEEL CORP./CLEVELAND DISTRICT IN CLEVELAND, OH
COKE PLANT NO. 1 COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS
AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:8
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:b
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in. ):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:
TYPE OF FUEL USED:
No. I1
Koppers1
197612
511
13-21
41-01
Gun-
flue1
COG68
No. 21
Koppers1
19582
19722
5ll
13-21
41-01
Gun-
flue1
COG,
Desulfur-
ized67
No. 31
Koppers1
19582
19722
5ll
13-21
41-01
Gun-
flue1
COG,
Desulfur-
ized67
No. 41
Koppers1
19582
19722
5ll
13-21
41-01
Gun-
flue1
COG,
Desulfur-
ized67
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
2,782 (all four batteries combined)5
2,049 (all four batteries combined)5
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery No. 5 was shut down in 1975.
"Included end-flue rehabilitation.2
300
-------
TABLE 28. REPUBLIC STEEL CORP./CLEVELAND DISTRICT IN CLEVELAND, OH
COKE PLANT NO. 2 COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS
AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3 No. 61 No. 71
MANUFACTURER: Koppers-Becker1 Koppers-Becker1
STARTUP DATE: 19522 19522
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:b 19792 19792
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS: 631. 631
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.): 13-21 13-21
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.): 41-01 41-01
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM: Gun-flue Gun-flue
TYPE OF FUEL USED: COG or BFG (both batteries)67
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY: 1,954 (both batteries combined)5
TYPICAL TONS/DAY: 1,286 (both batteries combined)5
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery No. 5 was shut down in 1975.67
^Included end-flue rehabilitation.2
301
-------
TABLE 29. REPUBLIC STEEL CORP./SOUTHERN DISTRICT, GULFSTEEL WORKS,
IN GADSDEN, AL
COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION: No. 21 No. 31
MANUFACTURER: Wilputte1'69 Wilputte1'69
STARTUP DATE: 194269 I96069
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE: 1973a'2
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS: 651'69 651'69
OVEN HEIGHT (m): 42»69 42»69
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.): 37-01 37-01
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM: Gun-flue1>69 Underjet1*69
TYPE OF FUEL USED: COG70 COG70
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY: 2,372;5 1.4001 (both batteries
combined)
TYPICAL TONS/DAY: 1,785 (both batteries combined)5
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2
302
-------
TABLE 30. REPUBLIC STEEL CORP./CENTRAL ALLOY DISTRICT IN MASSILLON, OH
COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:
TYPE OF FUEL USED:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
No. I1
Koppers-"-
19551
198218
13-21
41-01
Gun-flue1
71
COG
576:5 5001
5005
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
303
-------
TABLE 31. REPUBLIC STEEL CORP./MAHONING VALLEY DISTRICT IN WARREN, OH
COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION: No. 41
MANUFACTURER: Koppers72
STARTUP DATE: 19792
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS: 852>72
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.): 13-042
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.): 41-1142
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM: Underjet42
TYPE OF FUEL USED: COG42
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY: 1,8525
TYPICAL TONS/DAY: 1.2795
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBatteries No. 1 and 2 were shutdown in March 1979.
304
-------
TABLE 32. REPUBLIC STEEL CORP./MAHONING VALLEY DISTRICT IN YOUNGSTOWN, OH
COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-In. ):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in. ):
A1
Koppers1
19501'35
1982b,12
381
13-21
41-01
B1
Koppers1
19501'35
1982b>12
651
13-21
41 -O1
C1
Koppers1
1950s*1
591
13-21
41 -O1
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM: Gun-flue1 Gun-flue1 Gun-flue1
TYPE OF FUEL USED: COG42 COG42 COG42
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY: 2.970;5 2.4601 (all three batteries
combined)
TYPICAL TONS/DAY: 2,735 (all three batteries combined)5
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery rebuilt in 1962.2
"Scheduled shut down; Federal Consent Decree.12
305
-------
TABLE 33. UNITED STATES STEEL CORP./CLAIRTON WORKS IN CLAIRTON, PA
COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in. ):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:
TYPE OF FUEL USED:
COKE PRODUCTION:
No. I73
Wilputte2
195573
197973
6473
13 -O73
37-073
Gun-flue73
COG45
No. 273
Wilputte2
195573
197973
6473
13-073
37-073
Gun-flue73
COG45
No. 373
Wilputte2
195573
197973
6473
13-073
37-073
Gun-flue73
COG45
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
20,780 (entire coke plant)5
16,342 (entire coke plant)5
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
(continued)
306
-------
TABLE 33 (continued)
COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
OVEN LENGTH (f t~in. ) :
No. 7?3
Koppers2
195474
198418
6477
42
No. 873
Koppers2
1954?5
198418
6477
42
No. 9?3
Koppers2
195476
19 8418
6477
42
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:
TYPE OF FUEL USED:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
45
COG
See previous
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
COG45
(continued)
307
-------
TABLE 33 (continued)
COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION: No. 1573
MANUFACTURER: Koppers2
STARTUP DATE: 1953a>78
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS: 6173
OVEN HEIGHT (m): 42
OVEN LENGTH (ft-In.):
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:
TYPE OF FUEL USED: COG45
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY: See previous pages5
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
(continued)
308
-------
TABLE 33 (continued)
COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
No. 16 73
Wilputte2
198218
6173
No. 17 73
Wilputte2
195080
198218
6173
42
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:
TYPE OF FUEL USED: COG45 COG45
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY: See previous pages5
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
(continued)
309
-------
TABLE 33 (continued)
COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:
TYPE OF FUEL USED:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
No.
1973
No.
2073
No.
2173
No.
2273
Koppers-Becker (all 4 batteries)^
195181 1947b»82 194783 194684
197773 1972C»18 1973d»18
8773
52
8773
8773
8773
Underjet (all 4 batteries)73
COG (all 4 batteries)73
See previous pages
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
MANUFACTURER:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
ESP
(serves
battery No.
Micropul45
197945
• 4 inde-
pendent
field; 2
operate
at any
one time
• Damper
valves
control
flow85
85
(continued)
310
-------
TABLE 33 (continued)
COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
Power
require-
ment =
15,600
kwhr/day85
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery No. 15 rebuilt in 1979.2
bBattery No. 20 rebuilt in 1978.73
clnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.-1-^
^Involved rehabilitation from bench up.'3
311
-------
TABLE 34. UNITED STATES STEEL CORP./FAIRFIELD WORKS IN FAIRFIELD, AL
COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:8 No. 22 No. 92
MANUFACTURER:
U.S. Steel/ Koppers-Becker2
Still2
STARTUP DATE: 19782 195838
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE: 1974b>87
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE: c
NO. OF OVENS: 572 632
OVEN HEIGHT (m): 62 ,, 42 R,
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.): 47-7b:> 41-lBb
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM: Gun-flue88 Gun-flue88
TYPE OF FUEL USED: COG88 COG88
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY: 6,866 (appears to be for 5 battery
operation, i.e., Nos. 2, 5, 6, 7,
and 9)5'65
TYPICAL TONS/DAY: 5,930 (appears to be for 5 battery
operation, i.e., NOB. 2, 5, 6, 7,
and 9)5'65
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 were shut down in 1977, 1977, 1980, 1980,
1979, and 1978, respectively.
bBattery No. 9 was rebuilt in 1979.86
cBattery No. 9 has been idling hot since August 1980.65
312
-------
TABLE 35. UNITED STATES STEEL CORP./FAIRLESS WORKS IN FAIRLESS HILLS, PA
COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in. ):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:
TYPE OF FUEL USED:
COKE PRODUCTION:
No. I1
Wilputte1
19522
1978a»2
13-61
41-01
Underjet1
COG89
No. 21
Wilputte1
19532
1978a«2
13-61
41-01
Underjet1
COG89
RATED TONS/DAY: 3,000 (both batteries combined)5
TYPICAL TONS/DAY: 3,000 (both batteries combined)5
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2
313
-------
TABLE 36. UNITED STATES STEEL CORP./GARY WORKS IN GARY, IN
COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:a
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:
TYPE OF FUEL USED:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
No. I2
Koppers-Becker2
19702,90
1979b>2
No. 22
U.S. Steel/Still2
19752,90
62,90
47-4^0
Underjet90
COG92
572
62,90
47-1090
Multi-stage,
Gun-flue50
COG and BFG9
11,960 (all 8 batteries combined)5
9,750 (all 8 batteries combined)5
(continued)
314
-------
TABLE 36 (continued).
COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:
TYPE OF FUEL USED:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
No. 32
19762'90
Multi-stage,
Gun-flue90
COG and BFG94
See previous
No. 52
U.S. Steel/Still2 Wilputte2
19542,90
572
62,90
47-1090
198818
772,91
32,90
37-590
Double divided,
Underjet90
COG and BFG
95
(continued)
315
-------
TABLE 36 (continued).
COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
OVEN LENGTH (ft-In. ):
No. 72
Wilputte2
195490
1978b»2
198818
772,91
32.90
37-590
No. 132
Koppers-Becker2
19512,90
1974b>2
198718
772
32,90
37-590
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:
TYPE OF FUEL USED:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
Double divided,
Underjet90
COG and BFG96
Underjet90
COG9 7
See previous pages-*
(continued)
316
-------
TABLE 36 (continued).
COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:21
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
No. 152
Wilputte2
19512,90
1977b'2
772
32,90
37-590
No. 162
Wilputte2
19492,90
1975b>2
198718
772,91
32,90
37-590
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:
TYPE OF FUEL USED:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
Double divided,
Underjet90
COG98
Double divided,
Underjet90
COG99
See previous pages-*
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBatteries No. 9 and 11 pushed empty in 1971; Batteries No. 10, 12, and 14
pushed empty in 1975.90
^Involved end-flue rehabilitation.2
317
-------
TABLE 37. UNITED STATES STEEL CORP./LORAIN-CUYAHOGA WORKS IN LORAIN, OH
COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:a
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:b
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
D38
Koppers-
Becker2
19572
198212,42
592
32
39-642
G2
Koppers-
Becker2
19562
19772
592
32
39-642
H2
Koppers-
Becker2
19552
19782
592
32
39-642
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:
TYPE OF FUEL USED: COG42 COG42 COG42
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY: 4,468 (all 7 batteries combined)5
TYPICAL TONS/DAY: 4,319 (all 7 batteries combined)5
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
(continued)
318
-------
TABLE 37 (continued).
COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:a
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:b
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
12
Wilputte2
19552
19 7 92
592
S2
39-642
J2
Wilputte2
19472
19702
592
32
39-642
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:
TYPE OF FUEL USED:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
COG42 COG42
See previous page-
(continued)
319
-------
TABLE 37 (continued)
COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:3
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:b
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in. ):
K38
Wilputte2
194738
19702
198212,42
5938
32
39-6*2
L38
Wilputte2
194738
19702
198212,42
5938
32
39-6*2
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:
TYPE OF FUEL USED:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
COG* 2
See previous
COG
42
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
alncluded end-flue rehabilitation.2
bBatteries D, K, and L are scheduled to be shut down in 1982; stretch out
application filed for 1985 shutdown.71985.7
320
-------
TABLE 38. UNITED STATES STEEL CORP./GENEVA WORKS IN PROVO, UT
COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION: No. I1 No. 21 No. 31 No. 41
MANUFACTURER: Koppers;2 Koppers-Becker100
(all 4 batteries)
STARTUP DATE: 1944;2 19501 (all 4 batteries)
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE: 19793'2 1979a>2
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS: 63 (on each of 4 batteries)1'100
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.): 13-0;100 13-61 (all 4 batteries)
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.): 40-5;100 42-01 (all 4 batteries)
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM: Underjet (all 4 batteries)1'100
TYPE OF FUEL USED: COG (all 4 batteries)101
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY: 5.000;1 3,5585 (all 4 batteries
combined)
TYPICAL TONS/DAY: 3,520 (all 4 batteries combined)5
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2
321
-------
TABLE 39. WHEELING-PITTSBURGH STEEL CORP./MON VALLEY PLANT IN MONESSEN, PA
COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE: •
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:
TYPE OF FUEL USED:
COKE PRODUCTION:d
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
No. I1
No. 21
Koppers-Becker2 Koppera-Becker^
19428'1
37c,103
13-01
43-01
Underjet]
191,2,103
13-01
43-01
Underjet1
COG
102
1,836 (both batteries combined)5
1,332 (both batteries combined)5
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery No. 1 was rebuilt in 1981.102,103
^Battery No. 2 was rebuilt in 1979, which included conversion from a 3-hole,
single collector main to a 4-hole, double collector main battery.2>103
GBattery No. 1 originally had 74 ovens; 37 ovens were rebuilt in 1981 which
included conversion from a 3-hole, single collector main to a 4-hole, double
collector main battery. The remaining 37 ovens are being converted to a
i n o n n *^
4-hole, double collector main battery .•LUZ»-LUJ
"Production data reflects the original two-battery (93-oven) operation.5
322
-------
TABLE 40. WHEELING-PITTSBURGH STEEL CORP./STEUBENVILLE PLANT
IN EAST STEUBENVILLE, WV
COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
• NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in. ):
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:
TYPE OF FUEL USED:
No. I2
Koppers2
1917b,104
1978e>2
A?2
32,104
37_564
Gun-flue64
COG64
No. 22
Koppers2
I917c,104
19786'2
472
32,104
37-564
Gun-flue64
COG64
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
4,400;1 5,2055 (all 4 batteries
combined)
4,310 (all 4 batteries combined)5
(continued)
323
-------
TABLE 40 (continued).
COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in. ):
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:
TYPE OF FUEL USED:
No. 32
Koppers-Becker2
19171,104
1978e»2
5l2
32,104
3 7-5 ^
Gun-flue64
COG64
No. 82
Koppers2
197638,104
792
612,104
47-1164
Under jet64
COG64
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY: See previous page5
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aPlant shut down Battery No. 4 (53 ovens) in 1977. Battery No. 5 (53 ovens)
in 1976, and Battery No. 6 (63 ovens) in 1977.104
bBattery No. 1 rebuilt in 1955.2>104
cBattery No. 2 rebuilt in 1953.2»104
dBattery No. 3 rebuilt in 1964.2,104
elnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2
324
-------
MATERIAL IN THIS SECTION SUBJECT TO CONFIDENTIALITY
REVIEW AND IS NOT RELEASABLE AS OF FEBRUARY 1, 1982.
FOR INFORMATION, CONTACT L. KESARI, U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY, DIVISION OF STATIONARY SOURCE ENFORCEMENT.
o
^ o
*Tl X
O W
3 o
o
O CO
n
W
co
-------
TABLE 1. ALABAMA BY-PRODUCTS CORP./TARRANT COKE PLANT IN TARRANT, AL
COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION: a>b
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in. ):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
No. 52»65
Koppers-
Becker65
19412,65
I96065
252
13-6 65
No. 62»65
Koppers-
Becker65
194165
198065
292
13-665
No. I;65 A2
Wilputte65
19682,65
197965
782,65
16-065
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM: Gun-flue (all three batteries)65
TYPE OF FUEL USED: COG (all three batteries)65
COKE PRODUCTION:0
RATED TONS/DAY: 2,400 (based on four battery operation)5
TYPICAL TONS/DAY: 2,100 (based on four battery operation)5
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery No. 2 was permanently shut down in August 1979.65
^A common stack serves Battery Nos. 5 and 6.65
cProduction data reflects operation of Battery Nos. 2, 5, 6, and A.5
325
-------
TABLE 2. ALLIED CHEMICAL CORP./ASHLAND PLANT IN ASHLAND, KY
COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in. ):
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:
TYPE OF FUEL USED:
No. 32
Wilputte2
19532
1973C»2
762
4.52
40-8106
Under jet106
COGl°6
No. 4a»2
Wilputte2
b
702
4.5.2 5105
46-1Q106
Gun-flue106
COG106
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY: 3,480 (both batteries combined)5
TYPICAL TONS/DAY: 2,100 (both batteries combined)5
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery No. 4 was shut down in December 1980 due to low coke demand.107
bBattery No. 4 was rebuilt in 1978.2
clnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2
326
-------
TABLE 3. CARONDELET COKEa IN ST. LOUIS, MO
COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in. ):
A108
Wilputte108
1913108
1967108
35108
32
37-Ol°8
B2
Simon-
Carves2
1913108
1975108
18108
32
37-0108
C108
Koppersl08
1952108 ,
1974108
4C-108
32
37-0108
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM: Underjet109 Underjet109
TYPE OF FUEL USED: Desulfurized COG (all three batteries)!08
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY: 1,000 (all three batteries combined)5
TYPICAL TONS/DAY: 800 (all three batteries combined)5
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aPlant was previously owned by Great Lakes Carbon Corp. prior to January
1981.109
327
-------
TABLE 4. CHATTANOOGA COKE AND CHEMICAL CORP. IN CHATTANOOGA, TN
COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:
TYPE OF FUEL USED:
No. I2
Semet/Solvay110
19182
I960110
24;2 2512
42
Underjet110
COGllO.lll
No. 22
Wilputte110
19 41 2
1979a>2
202
42
Underfire110
OOGllO.lll
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY: 576 (both batteries combined)110
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2
328
-------
TABLE 5. CITIZENS GAS AND COKE UTILITY IN INDIANAPOLIS, IN
COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
OVEN LENGTH (ft-In. ):
Eb»2
Wilputte2
19462
472
42
Hb>2
Koppers2
19412
4lH3
42
12
Dravo-StillH2
19792
722
52,112
49_9114
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM: Multi-stage (all three batteries)H2>H4
TYPE OF FUEL USED: Desulfurized COG (all three batteries)!14
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY: 1,086 (E and H batteries 1,645114
combined)^
TYPICAL TONS/DAY: 1,002 (E and H batteries
combined)5
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBatteries F and G, both 40 oven Wilputte batteries started up in 1926 and
1929, respectively, were shut down in 1979.
t>A common stack serves Batteries E and
329
-------
TABLE 6. DETROIT COKE CO. IN DETROIT, MI
COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:
TYPE OF FUEL USED:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
No. 62
Semet/Solvay2
19682,116
1978a>2
702,116
16-8H6
47-1H6
Gun-flueH6
COGH6
2,1505
2,000s
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2
330
-------
TABLE 7. DONNER-HANNA COKE CORP. IN BUFFALO, NY
COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
Afi2
Koppers2
19512
512
4; 2 221
No. 32
Koppers2
19642
SO2
42,21
No. 42
Koppers2
19672
502
42,21
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM: Gun-flue (all three batteries)22
TYPE OF FUEL USED: COG (all three batteries)20
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY: 3,004 (all three batteries combined)5
TYPICAL TONS/DAY: 3,004 (all three batteries combined)5
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:3
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aOne stack serves Battery AB; common stack serves Battery Nos. 3 and 4.H
331
-------
TABLE 8. EMPIRE COKE CO. IN HOLT, AL
COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION: No. I2 No. 22
MANUFACTURER: Semet/Solvay69 Semet/Solvay69
STARTUP DATE: 1906a>69 1906a»69
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS: 202»69 402>69
OVEN HEIGHT (m) : 32 32
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM: b Gun-flue70 Gun-flue70
TYPE OF FUEL USED: COG70 COG70
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY: 360 (both batteries combined)5
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM :c
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
batteries were rebuilt in 1978. 2
^Each battery is equipped with separate flues for each oven, therefore, a
single oven can be taken off-line without interferring with production.
Each battery is completely rebuilt every 20 years.70
cNo controls; plant located in attainment area.**9
332
-------
TABLE 9. MERCIER CORP./ERIE COKE AND CHEMICALS IN PAINESVILLE, OH
COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-ln.):
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:
TYPE OF FUEL USED:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
No. I2
No. 22
Koppers-Becker2 Koppers-Becker2
1926a>117
232
42
Gun-flue118
COG118
232
42
Gun-flue118
COGl18
450 (both batteries combined)5
400 (both batteries combined)5
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
^Both batteries were rebuilt in 1972.
333
-------
TABLE 10. INDIANA GAS AND CHEMICAL CORP. IN TERRE HAUTE, IN
COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION: No. I2 No. 22
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE: 19192 19262
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE: 1978a»2 1978a>2
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS: 302 302
OVEN HEIGHT (m): 42 42
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.): 30-0119 30-0119
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM: Underjetl20 Underjetl20
TYPE OF FUEL USED: COGl20 COGl20
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY: 400 (both batteries combined)5
TYPICAL TONS/DAY: 340 (both batteries combined)5
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2
334
-------
TABLE 11. IRONTON COKE CORP./A SUBSIDIARY OF McLOUTH STEEL CORP.
IN IRONTON, OH
COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in. ):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-In. ):
No. lb»2
Semet/Solvay121
19172,121
1947d,121
68121
11-11121
35-6121
No. 2C>2
Wilputtem
1954121
I978e,121
24121
12-2121
36-4121
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM: Horizontal flue;121 Double divided
underjet!21
TYPE OF FUEL USED: COGl22 COG122
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY: 2,650 (for a three battery operation)5
TYPICAL TONS/DAY: 2,223 (for a three battery operation)5
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery No. 3 (76 oven — Wilputte) presently shut down.?
^Battery No. 1 operating on a 48-hour coke time to keep ovens hot.?
cBattery No. 2 was shut down between January 1980 and February 1981.?
Presently the battery is on hot idle.?»l2l>l22
^Involved the addition of ovens. 121
elnvolved end-flue rehabilitation. 2> 121
335
-------
TABLE 12. JIM WALTER RESOURCES, INC./COKE, IRON AND CHEMICALS DIVISION
IN BIRHIMGHAM, AL
COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:8
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-In. ):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
No. 32
Koppers2
19522
1979b»65
SO2
14-0*5
No. 42
Koppers2
19562
1981b,65
302
14-065
No. 52
Koppers2
19592
198ib,65
302
14-065
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM: Gun-flue (all three batteries)88
TYPE OF FUEL USED: COG (all three batteries)88
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY: 2,760 (for a five battery operation)5
TYPICAL TONS/DAY: 2,400 (for a five battery operation)5
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery Nos. 1 and 2 were shut down in August 1980.
blnvolved standpipe replacement and topside work.65
336
-------
TABLE 13. KOPPERS CO., INC./INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS DIVISION, ERIE PLANT
IN ERIE, PA
COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:
TYPE OF FUEL USED:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
Koppers2
1943b,123
232
12-0123
42-0123
Under jetl
COG124
Koppers2
1943b»2
352
12-0123
42-0123
Under jetl
COG124
730;1 6255 (both batteries combined)
600 (both batteries combined)^
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aFacility previously owned and operated by Interlake, Inc.l
bBattery was rebuilt in 1971.I8
337
-------
TABLE 14. KOPPERS CO., INC./INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS DIVISION, TOLEDO PLANT
IN TOLEDO, OH
COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:3
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:
TYPE OF FUEL USED:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
C2,125
Wilputte2
19532,125
572,126
4126
37-7125
Underjet;1 A-dividedl25
COG125,127
8145
7025
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery C was on hot idle from September 1980 to August 1981.127
338
-------
TABLE 15. KOPPERS CO., INC./INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS DIVISION, WOODWARD PLANT
IN WOODWARD, AL
COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:8
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in. ):
No. I2
Koppers2
197765
6Q2.128
4.2 3128
39-0128
No. 2A2
Koppers2
197765
40128
A;2 3128
39-0128
No. 2B2
Koppers2
1937^5
1978C»65
38128
4.2 3128
39-0128
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM: Single-divided, gun-flue (all three
batteries)d»88
TYPE OF FUEL USED: COG (all three batteries)88
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY: 2,047 (all five batteries combined)5
TYPICAL TONS/DAY: 1,272 (all five batteries combined)5
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
(continued)
339
-------
TABLE 15 (continued)
COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:8
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in. ):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-In.):
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:
TYPE OF FUEL USED:
No. 4A and 4Bb«128
Koppers2
194965
1981C>65
582
14-0^5
Gun-flue65
COG65
No. 5b»2
Koppers2
195265
1978°. 65
302
14-065
Gun-flue65
COG65
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
.TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
See previous page
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery No. 3 was permanently shut down in November 1974.65
^Battery Nos. 4A, 4B, and 5 were idling hot for a 14-month period (May 1980-
July 1981) and were recharged in July 1981.65
clnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.65
^One stack serves Battery No. 1; common stack for Batteries 2A and 2B.128
340
-------
TABLE 16. MILWAUKEE SOLVAY COKE CO./PICKANDS MATHER AND CO. MILWAUKEE, WI
COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION: No. 32 No. 42
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:a
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS: 402 602
OVEN HEIGHT (m): 32 32
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.): 20-0129 20-Ql29
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM: Underjet130 Underjet130
TYPE OF FUEL USED: COG130 COG130
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY: 800 (both batteries combined)5
TYPICAL TONS/DAY: 725 (both batteries combined)5
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery was rebuilt in 1974.2
341
-------
TABLE 17. PHILADELPHIA COKE CO., INC. IN PHILADELPHIA, PA
COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:
TYPE OF FUEL USED:
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
A/B2
Koppers-Beckefl^l
19292
742
42
40-0131
Gun-flue131
COG—Natural Gas if needed1^
9405
8805
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
342
-------
TABLE 18. TOWAWANDA COKE CORP. IN TOWAWANDA, NY
COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3 No. 221
MANUFACTURER: Wilputte2
STARTUP DATE: 19622
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS: 602
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-ln.): 12-221
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.): 41-221
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:
TYPE OF FUEL USED: COG20
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY: 1,7905
TYPICAL TONS/DAY: 9005
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery No. 1 was shut down in June 1972.2^
343
-------
n
o
O
O
Cfl Pd
H W
O
^
to
MATERIAL IN THIS SECTION SUBJECT TO CONFIDENTIALITY
REVIEW AND IS NOT RELEASABLE AS OF FEBRUARY 1, 1982.
FOR INFORMATION, CONTACT L. KESARI, U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY, DIVISION OF STATIONARY SOURCE ENFORCEMENT.
-------
REFERENCES
COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACKS
1. World Steel Industry Data Handbook: Vol. I. The United States.
McGraw-Hill Magazine. '978. pp. 20-25. (Reliability No. 4.)
2. Technical Approach for n Coke Production Cost Model. PEDCo
Environmental, Inc. EPA Contract No. 68-02-3071. pp. 39-50.
(Reliability No. 4.)
3. EPA Region V file review by GCA/Technology Division, December 1981.
4. Telephone conversation. Ed Luebering, SW District Ohio EPA to Gene
Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. March 9, 1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
5. Development Document for Proposed Effluent Limitations Guidelines and
Standards for the Iron and Steel Manufacturing Point Source Category.
Oct. 1979. Vol. II. Draft Report, pp. 18-49. (Reliability No. 4.)
6. Telephone conversation. Steve Samorgin, Ohio Environmental Protection
Agency-Southwest District to Sandy Beaton, GCA/Technology Division.
November 1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
7. Region V engineers comments to GCA questionnaire, December 1981.
8. Lafite, H. Coke Plant Combustion Stack Gas Cleaning at ARMCO Steel
Corp., Houston, Texas. Presented at the 70th Annual Meeting of the Air
Pollution Control Association, Toronto, Ontario. June 20-24, 1977.
(Reliability No. 3.)
9. Trenholm, Andrew R. Study of Coke Oven Battery Stack Emission Control
Technology-Control Methods. Final Report-Volume II. MRI Project No.
4369-L(5). March 1979. (Reliability No. 2.)
10. EPA Region V files. (Renewal Permit Application dated 1/26/79—
No. 1809010000 P013).
11. Summary Sheets Compiled by PEDCo from stack test reports within regional
EPA offices. PEDCo Environmentalists, Inc. Summary Sheets provided to
JACA Corp. by Tom Maslarty. JACA Files. RACT No. 510418-510419.
(Reliability No. 2.)
344
-------
12. Telephone conversation. Bernard Bloom, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Division of Stationary Source Enforcement to Michael Jasinski,
CCA/Technology Division. December 1980. (Reliability No. 2.)
13. Letter from J. McGrogan, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of
Natural Resources to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. Letter dated
February 19, 1981. (Reliability No. 1.)
14. Petroccia, M., et al. Assessment of Air Emissions from and Controls for
Iron and Steel Making Sources - Bethlehem Steel Corporation/Burns Harbor
Coke Batteries 1 and 2, Chesterton, Indiana. GCA/Technology Division
Draft Final Report TR-80-56-G. Prepared for U.S. EPA. July 1980.
(Reliability No. 1.)
15. Telephone conversation. Andy Sunderland, Indiana State Air Pollution
Control to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. March 3, 1981.
(Reliability No. 2.)
16. Telephone conversation. Bob Clark, Pennsylvania Department of
Environmental Resources, Ebensburg, PA to Sandy Beaton, GCA/Technology
Division. October 29, 1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
17. Report of emissions test. No. 18 Coke Oven Battery Combustion Stack at
Bethlehem Steel Corp./Johnstown, PA. (Franklin Coke Plant). Sept. 28,
1978. RACT No. 510411-510415. (Reliability No. 2.)
18. Computer printout. Prepared by PEDCo Environmental, Inc. for U.S. EPA,
Washington, D.C. Coke battery data compilation for the United States.
(Reliability No. 3.)
19. Report of emissions tests. No. 18 Coke Oven Battery Combustion Stack at
Bethlehem Steel Corp./Johnstown, PA. (Franklin Coke Plant.) JACA
Library. (Reliability No. 2.)
20. Telephone conversation. Henry Sandonato, New York State Department of
Environmental Conservation to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.
February 17, 1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
21. Letter response. Richard Craig, U.S. EPA Region II to William Farino,
GCA/Technology Division. December 1981. (Reliability No. 1.)
22. Telephone conversation. Jack Hawsrath, Erie County Health Department to
Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. February 17, 1981. (Reliability
No. 2.)
23. Telephone conversation. Mark Sylvester, Maryland State Department of
Health and Mental Hygiene to Mike Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division.
February 13, 1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
24. Telephone conversation. Ralph Hall, Maryland State Department of Health
and Mental Hygiene to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division. October
29, 1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
345
-------
25. Stack Test Report No. 78, Bethlehem Steel Corp. Coke Oven Underfire
Stacks at Sparrows Pt., Maryland. Testing by Dept. of Health and Mental
Hygiene, State of Maryland. Spring-Summer 1975. Table 1-1 and 1-2.
JACA Library. (Reliability No. 1.)
26. Oliver, J. F. and J. T. Aanne. Control of Visible Emissions at CF&I Coke
Plant - Pueblo, Colorado. JAPCA 29(9):920-25. September 1976.
(Reliability No. 3.)
27. Dion, J. A. and G. D. Young. Coke Battery Survey CF&I Steel Corporation,
Pueblo, Colorado, April 1979. EPA-330/1-7-8005. RACT 503469 [start].
(Reliability No. 2.)
28. Telephone conversation. Dennis Myers, Colorado State Department of
Health to Stephen Piper, GCA/Technology Division. February 1981.
(Reliability No. 2.)
29. EPA Region V files. (Ford response to EPA questionnaire—2/21/78).
30. Nunno, Thomas, et al. Assessment of Air Emissions from Steel Plant
Sources. Ford Motor Company. River Rouge Plant - Coke Plant
Inspection. GCA/Technology Division Report No. TR-81-38-6. Prepared for
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. September 1980. (Reliability
No. 1.)
31. EPA Region V files. (Quote to Ford for Combustion Stack ESP—1/8/80).
, 32. Telephone conversation. Don Kuh, Indiana State Air Pollution Control to
Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. March 4, 1981. (Reliability
No. 2.)
33. Inland Steel Publication: Air, Water and Inland Steel. (Reliability
No. 4.)
34. EPA Region V files. (August 1981 letter from Inland to EPA.)
35. EPA Region V files. (1974 permits.)
36. EPA Region V files. (Interlake Trip Report—6/80.)
37. Telephone conversation. J. Sokorowski, City of Chicago Department of
Inspectional Services to Marc Grant, GCA/Technology Division. March 5,
1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
38. Cost Effectiveness Model for Pollution Control of Coke Facilities.
EPA-600/2-79-185. August 1979. Table 8. (Reliability No. 4.)
39. Telephone conversation. Ken Bowman, Pennsylvania Department of
Environmental Resources to Mike Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division.
February 18, 1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
346
-------
40. Petroccla, M. et a.l. Assessment of Air Emissions from and Controls for
Iron and Steelmaking Sources. J&L Steel Corporation/Aliquippa Works.
GCA/Technology Division Final Report No. TR-81-57-G. Prepared for U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency. August 1981. (Reliability No.l .)
41. PADER Test Report on Coke Battery A-5 Combustion Stack at J&L Steel/
Aliquippa Works. Test No. 1978. Test date June 1978. JACA Library.
(Reliability No. 1. )
42. Telephone conversation. Ted Davis, NJ2 District Ohio EPA to Gene Bergson,
GCA/Technology Division. February 27, 1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
43. EPA Region V files. (J&L letter to EPA—4/78.)
44. Telephone conversation. Edward Wojciechowski, U.S. EPA Region V to Gene
Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. February 4, 1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
45. Telephone conversation. S. Banninthaya, Allegheny County Department of
Health to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. February 12, 1981.
(Reliability No. 2.)
46. Devorleln, Howard. Report on Source Tests and Visible Emission
Observations at Kaiser Steel Corp./Fontana Works - Coke Oven Battery
Combustion Stack "E". RACT Box No. 510578-510670. April 1979.
(Reliability No. 1.)
47. Spawn, P. D. and R. Li. Kaiser Steel Corporation/Fontana Works - Coke
Plant Inspection. GCA/Technology Division Final Report. No. TR-79-53-G.
December 1980. Prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
(Reliability No. 1.)
48. Telephone conversation. Lois Green, U.S. EPA Region IX to Michael
Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division. November 1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
49. Tomlinson, R. and D. Holtz. Report on Source Tests, Visible Emissions,
and Plant Observations at Kaiser Steel Corp./Fontana Works - Coke Oven
Battery "B". Engineering-Science, Inc., August 1979. RACT No.
510453-510484. (Reliability No. 1.)
50. Letter from Robert L. Tanlinson, Engineering-Science, Inc. to Gary
Lavagnino, Surveillance & Analysis Division, EPA Region IX. RE;
Requested information for the Kaiser Steel Battery "B" Coke Oven
Baghouse. September 18, 1979. RACT No. 510690. (Reliability No. 2.)
51. RACT No. 510416-510417. (Reliability No. 2.)
52. RACT No- 510421. (Reliability No. 2.)
53. Devorlein, H. Report on Source Tests, Visible Emissions, and Plant
Observations at Kaiser Steel Corp./Fontana Works - Coke Oven Battery
"C". Engineering-Science, Inc. May 1979. RACT No. 510453-510528.
(Reliability No. 1.)
347
-------
54. Report on Source Tests, Visible Emissions, and Plant Observations at
Kaiser Steel Corp./Fontana Works - Coke Oven Battery "D".
Engineering-Science, Inc. January 1979. RACT No. 510529-510576.
(Reliability No. 1.)
55. Report on Source Tests, Visible Emissions, and Plant Observations.
Kaiser Steel Corp./Fontana Works - Coke Oven Batteries F and G.
Engineering-Science, Inc. February 1980. JACA Library and RACT No.
510622-510681. (Reliability No. 1.)
56. RACT No. 511727. (Reliability No. 2.)
57. Telephone conversation. John Hepola, U.S. EPA Region VI to Michael
Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division. November 1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
58. Telephone conversation. Bernard Bloom, U.S. EPA, Washington, B.C. to
Mike Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division. February 1980. (Reliability
No. 2.)
59. EPA Report V files. (GLS response to EPA questionnaire—2/21/78.)
60. EPA Region V files. (Data supplied to EPA by GLS.)
61. Telephone conversation. Anton Telford, State of Illinois Environmental
Protection Agency to Sandy Beaton, GCA/Technology Division. October
1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
62. RACT No. 512124. (Reliability No. 2.)
63. Spawn, P. D., et al. National Steel Corporation, Weirton Steel Division,
Plant Inspection, August 1981. GCA/Technology Division Draft Final
Report. TR-81-118-G. Prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency. November 1981. (Reliability No. 1.)
64. Telephone conversation. John Raggi, West Virginia Air Pollution Control
to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. February 27, 1981.
(Reliability No. 2.)
65. Letter response. Paul Pate, Director of Jefferson County Department of
Health to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division. December 1981.
(Reliability No. 1.)
66. EPA Region V file. (Arthur D. Little report on RCS/Chicago new coke
battery—1978.)
67. Telephone conversation. Mr. Habib, Cleveland Air Pollution Control to
Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. February 27, 1981. (Reliability
No. 2.)
348
-------
68. Pape, Ralph and Jim Steiner. Particulate Matter Emission Tests for No. 1
Coke Battery Combustion Stack at Republic Steel/Cleveland, Ohio. Acurex
Corporation. Final Report No. 80-60/EE. May 1980. RACT No.
510323-510410. (Reliability No. 1.)
69. Telephone conversation. Sue Robertson, Alabama State Air Pollution
Control to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division. October 1981.
(Reliability No. 2.)
70. Telephone conversation. Sue Robertson, Alabama State Air Pollution
Control to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. February 25, 1981.
(Reliability No. 2.)
71. Telephone conversation. Andy Pasko, Canton City Department of Health to
Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. March 5, 1981. (Reliability
No. 2.)
72. EPA Region V files. (Trip Report by Dan Bakk—2/20/80.)
73. Spawn, P. D., et al. Assessment of Air Emissions from and Controls for
Iron and Steel Making Sources. United States Steel Corp./Clairton Works
Coke Plant in Clairton, Pennsylvania. GCA/Technology Division, Draft
Final Report No. TR-80-30-G. Prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency. April 1980. (Reliability No. 1.)
74. Source Sheet on USSC/Clairton Coke Battery No. 7. RACT No. 500478.
(Reliability No. 1.)
75. Source Sheet on USSC/Clairton Coke Battery No. 8. RACT No. 500484.
(Reliability No. 1.)
76. Source Sheet on USSC/ClairtotuXoke Battery No. 9. RACT No. 500490.
(Reliability No. 1.)
77. Test Data on USSC/Clairton, Battery No. 17. Coke Side Shed, RACT No.
505575-505870. (Reliability No. 1.)
78. Source Sheet on USSC/Clairton Coke Battery No. 15. RACT No. 500526.
(Reliability No. 1.)
79. Source Sheet on USSC/Clairton Coke Battery No. 16. RACT No. 500528.
(Reliability No. 1.)
80. Source Sheet on USSC/Clairton Coke Battery No. 17. RACT No. 500541.
(Reliability No. 1.)
81. Source Sheet on USSC/Clairton Coke Battery No. 19. RACT No. 500553.
(Reliability No. 1.)
82. Source Sheet on USSC/Clairton Coke Battery No. 20, RACT No. 500562.
(Reliability No. 1.)
349
-------
83. Source Sheet on USSC/Clairton Coke Battery No. 21. RACT No. 500567.
(Reliability No. 1.)
84. Source Sheet on USSC/Clairton Coke Battery No. 22. RACT No. 500581.
(Reliability No. 1.)
85. Letter from K. A. Elkan, General Superintendent USSC/Clairton Works to
U.S. EPA Region III, Director of Enforcement, RE; Compliance Emission
Sampling Program-Battery 21 Stack (ESP outlet). February 1980. JACA
Library and RACT No. 510301-510312 and 511857-511908. (Reliability
No. 2.)
86. Spawn, Peter, et al. Assessment of Mr Emissions From and Controls for
Iron and Steel Making Sources. USSC/Fairfield Works in Fairfield, Al.
GCA/Technology Division Final Report No. TR-79-59-G. Prepared for U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency. November 1980. (Reliability No. 1..)
87. Coke Battery Survey Procedures, Description, and Data Presentation.
USSC/Fairfield Works in Fairfield, AL. December 1977. EPA
330/1-77-012. RACT No. 501519. (Reliability No. 2.)
88. Telephone conversation. Veda Hampton, Jefferson County Department of
Health to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. February 25, 1981.
(Reliability No. 2.)
89. PADER test of U.S. Steel Corp./Fairless Works in Fairless Hills, PA.
October 8, 1974. (Reliability No. 1.)
90. EPA Region V files. (U.S. Steel/Gary response to EPA interogatory—1979.)
91. EPA Region V files. (U.S. Steel/Gary Litigation Report—12/1977.)
92. Emission Testing at U.S. Steel Corp./Gary Works in Gary, Indiana. Coke
Battery No. 1. March 19, 1980. JACA Library. (Reliability No. 1.)
93. Report on emission tests conducted for USSC at their Gary Works No. 2
coke oven battery in Gary, Indiana. Clean Air Engineering. July 1978.
JACA Library. (Reliability No. 1.)
94. Emission Testing for U.S. Steel Corp./Gary Works in Gary, Indiana.
Kermon Environmental Services. Test on February 6, 1980. JACA Library.
(Reliability No. 1.)
95. Emission testing for U.S. Steel Corp./Gary Works in Gary, Indiana. Coke
Battery No. 5. Kermon Environmental Services. Test on November 11,
1979. JACA Library. (Reliability No. 1.)
96. Emission Testing for U.S. Steel Corp./Gary Works in Gary, Indiana. Coke
battery No. 7. Kermon Environmental Services. Test on November 5,
1979. JACA Library. (Reliability No. 1.)
350
-------
97. Emission testing for U.S. Steel Corp./Gary Works in Gary, Indiana. Coke
Battery No. 13. Kermon Environmental Services. Test on January 24,
1980. JACA Library. (Reliability No. 1.)
98. Emission testing for U.S. Steel Corp./Gary Works in Gary, Indiana. Coke
Battery No. 15. Kermon Environmental Services. Test on September 30,
1979. JACA Library. (Reliability No. 1.)
99. Emission testing for U.S. Steel Corp./Gary Works in Gary, Indiana. Coke
Battery No. 16. Kermon Environmental Services. Test on November 17,
1979. JACA Library. (Reliability No. 1.)
100. National Enforcement Investigation Center, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency Report on Plant Inspection at U.S. Steel Corp./Geneva Works.
1977. (Reliability No. 2.)
101. Telephone conversation. Mr. Kopta, Utah State Air Pollution Control to
Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. February 27, 1981. (Reliability
No. 2.)
102. Telephone conversation. Tony Johnson, Pennsylvania Department of
Environmental Resources to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.
February 26, 1981, (Reliability No. 2.)
103. Letter response. Richard Thomas, Pennsylvania Department of
Environmental Resources to Sandy Beaton, GCA/Technology Division.
December 1981. (Reliability No. 1.)
104. Telephone conversation and letter response. John Raggi, West Virginia
Air Pollution Control to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division.
November 1981. (Reliability No. 1.)
105. Emissions Test Report. Submitted to Allied Chem Corp., Semet-Solvey
Division, Ashland, Kentucky. The Ministeir Stein System. York Research
Corp. Report No. 1-9868-04. June 7, 1979. (Reliability No. 1.)
106. Letter response. James Dills, Commonwealth of Kentucky Department for
Natural Resources and Environmental Protection to Mike Jasinski,
GCA/Technology Division. February 26, 1982. (Reliability No. 1.)
107. Letter response. James Dills, Kentucky Department for Natural Resources
and Environmental Protection to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology
Division. November 19, 1981. (Reliability No. 1.)
108. Letter response. Richard Knapp, City of St. Louis Department of Health
to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division. November 1981.
(Reliability No. 1.)
109. Telephone conversation. Richard Knapp and Tom Schippes. City of St.
Louis Department of Health and Missouri Air Pollution Control,
respectively to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. February 24,
1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
351
-------
110. Telephone conversation. Harvey Rice, Chattanooga Air Pollution Control
Bureau to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division. October 26, 1981.
(Reliability No. 2.)
111. Telephone conversation. Harvey Rice, Chattanooga Air Pollution Control
Bureau to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division. February 18, 1981.
(Reliability No. 2.)
112. The Fabric Filter Newsletter. Mcllvaine Inc. publication. July 30,
1980. No. 56. p. 5. (Reliability No. 4.)
113. EPA Region V Files. (Citizen Gas and Coke Data supplied to EPA in 1977.)
114. Telephone conversation. Dave Jordan, Indianapolis Air Pollution Control
Board to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division- March 4, 1981.
(Reliability No. 2.)
115. Telephone conversation. Dave Jordan, Indianapolis Air Pollution Control
Board to Sandy Beaton, GCA/Technology Division. October 1981.
(Reliability No. 2.)
116. EPA Revion V Files. (Detroit Coke).
117. EPA Region V Files. (Consent Decree dated 2/5/79 - Exhibit #2).
118. Telephone conversation. Dennis Bush, NE District Ohio EPA to Gene
Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. February 27, 1981. (Reliability
No. 2.)
119. Telephone conversation. George Karp, City of Terre Haute Air Pollution
Control to Sandy Beaton, GCA/Technology Division. October 1982.
(Reliability No. 2.)
120. Telephone conversation. Ken Kearney, Indiana State Air Pollution Control
to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. March 4, 1981. (Reliability
No. 2.)
121. EPA Region V Files. (Plant Progress Report, May 1981, to EPA Region V.)
122. Telephone conversation. Frank Phillips, Portsmouth City Health
Department to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. February 27, 1981.
(Reliability No. 2.)
123. RACT #503715-503716. (Reliability No. 2.)
124. Telephone conversation. Larry Wonders, Pennsylvania Department of
Environmental Resources to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.
February 17, 1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
125. Region V Files. (Permits - no date.)
352
-------
126. EPA Region V Files. (Acurex Report - August 1980.)
127. Telephone conversation. Tom Doktor, Toledo Pollution Control Agency to
Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. February 27, 1981. (Reliability
No. 2.)
128. Jasinski, M. R. Field Inspection Report of Major Air Point Source
Facilities in Region IV. EPA Contract No. 68-01-4143. Re: Koppers Co.,
Inc., Woodward, Alabama Coke Plant. Inspected by GCA on July 8 and 9,
1980. (Reliability No. 1.)
129. Telephone conversation. Jerry Bevington, Wisconsin Department of Natural
Resources to Sandy Beaton, GCA/Technology Division. October 1981.
(Reliability No. 2.)
130. Telephone conversation. Jerry Bevington, Wisconsin Department of Natural
Resources to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. March 9, 1981.
(Reliability No. 2.)
131. Telephone conversation and letter response. Norman Glazer, City of
Philadelphia Air Management to Sandy Beaton, GCA/Technology Division.
November 1981. (Reliability No. 2.)
132. Telephone conversation. Robert King, City of Philadelphia Air Management
to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. February 13, 1981.
(Reliability No. 2.)
353
------- |