AN AIR POLLUTION CONTROL
     EQUIPMENT INVENTORY OF  THE
     AMERICAN STEEL INDUSTRY

            Volume 1

        D,raft Final Report
GCA
GCA CORPORATION
Technology Division
213 Burlington Road
Bedford, Mass. 01730

-------
                                              GCA-TR-82-11-G
  U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Division of Stationary  Source Enforcement
            Washington, B.C.
         Contract No. 68-01-6316
        Technical  Service Area  1
         Work Assignment No.  28
EPA Project Officer

   John R. Busik
EPA Task Director

  Bernard Bloom
                                      EPA Assignment Manager

                                            Laxmi Kesari
         AN AIR POLLUTION CONTROL
        EQUIPMENT INVENTORY OF THE
         AMERICAN STEEL INDUSTRY

                 Volume  1

            Draft Final  Report
              February 1982
               Prepared  by:

            Michael  Jasinski
               Peter Spawn
              Sandra Beaton
              Eugene  Bergson
              William Farino
             GCA CORPORATION
         GCA/TECHNOLOGY DIVISION
         Bedford,  Massachusetts

-------
                                   DISCLAIMER
     This Draft Final Report was furnished to the Environmental Protection
Agency by GCA Corporation, GCA/Technology Division,  Burlington Road, Bedford,
Massachusetts 01730, in partial fulfillment of Contract No. 68-01-6136,
Technical Service Area 1, Work Assignment No. 28.  The opinions, findings, and
conclusions expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of
the Environmental Protection Agency.  Mention of company or product names is
not to be considered as an endorsement by the Environmental Protection Agency.
SPECIAL NOTE
     The inventory reported in this document was initiated in October 1980
under EPA Contract No. 68-01-4143, Technical Service Area 1, Task No. 94.
Additional data compilation and investigation were performed in January 1981
under EPA Contract No. 68-01-6316, Technical Service Area 1, Task No. 6
(Phase II), and in March 1981 under EPA Contract No. 68-01-6316, Technical
Service Area 1, Work Assignment No. 6 (Amendment 1 - Phase III).  Mr. Bernard
Bloom and Mr. Laxmi Kesari served as EPA Task Directors/Assignment Managers
for this program.

     All material presented in this document is subject to a confidentiality
review, and is not releasable as of February 1, 1982.  For further
information, contact Mr. Laxmi Kesari, United States Environmental Protection
Agency, Division of Stationary Source Enforcement, Washington, D.C.
                                  ii

-------
                                    CONTENTS


Tables                                                                    ill

Abstract                       .                                            iv
                                     TABLES
                                   (Volume 1)
Numbers
 1-40       Coke Oven Charging (Furnace Coke Producers)	      1
 1-18       Coke Oven Charging (Foundry Coke Producers)	     60
            References	     80

 1-40       Coke Oven Pushing (Furnace Coke Producers)	     90
 1-18       Coke Oven Pushing (Foundry Coke Producers)	    148
            References	    168

 1-40       Coke Oven Quenching (Furnace Coke Producers)	    179
 1-18       Coke Oven Quenching (Foundry Coke Producers)	    235
            References	.	    255

 1-40       Coke Oven Combustion Stacks (Furnace Coke Producers) • •  •    264
 1-18       Coke Oven Combustion Stacks (Foundry Coke Producers) . .  .    325
            References	    344
                                  ill

-------
                                    ABSTRACT


     At the request of the Division of Stationary Source Enforcement, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, GCA/Technology Division compiled an inventory
of process and emissions control equipment installed within the American steel
industry.  Every effort was made to collect the most accurate data possible,
using technical literature, EPA and EPA-contractor reports, and discussions
with local, state, and federal regulatory agencies.  Each data point is
referenced so its origin and reliability can be assessed.

     Specifically, the inventory, contained within two volumes, represents
information for the following categories:

     (1)  Coke Plants (Furnace and Foundry Coke Producers)

          •    charging

          •    pushing

          •    quenching

          •    combustion stacks

          •    coke oven gas desulfurization

     (2)  Sintering Machines

     (3)  Blast Furnaces

     (4)  External Iron Desulfurization Stations

     (5)  Steelmaking Shops

          •    basic oxygen converters

          •    electric arc furnaces

          •    open hearth furnaces

     (6)  Scarfing Machines (automatic)
                                     IV

-------
     MATERIAL ,IN THIS SECTION SUBJECT TO CONFIDENTIALITY

    REVIEW AND IS NOT RELEASABLE AS OF FEBRUARY 1, 1982.

   FOR INFORMATION, CONTACT L. KESARI, U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL

PROTECTION AGENCY, DIVISION OF STATIONARY SOURCE ENFORCEMENT.
                                                                                    n
                                                                                     go
                                                                                   - ^
                                                                                   > H
                                                                                   n 2
                                                                                   M
                                                                                     o
                                                                                   o pu
                                                                                   O P]
                                                                                     o
                                                                                     H
                                                                                     a
                                                                                     o

-------
               TABLE 1.   ARMCO INC./HAMILTON WORKS IN HAMILTON,  OH

              COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
  NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
  OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:

COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:

LID LIFTER MECHANISM:

DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:

GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:

COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:


CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
No. I1
           No. 21     No. 31
No. 41
Koppers-Becker (all four batteries)2
1927a>3    19381      19411      19471
           1976b>2    I97?b>2    1978b>2
451        15l        251
3(each,  all four batteries)-*-
l(each,  all four batteries)-*-
12-5(each, all four batteries)1
43-01      43-01      40-81
                                 40-81
1,930 (all four batteries combined)6
1,811 (all four batteries combined)6

Larry car (all four batteries)-*-

Screw feed (all four batteries)^

Manual (all four batteries)^>-*

Simultaneous (all four batteries)^

Manual (all four batteries)^

1,3,2 (cokeside, pushside, center-all four
batteries)^

Sequential Charging;^ Stage Charging0>5
(all four batteries)
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery rebuilt 1961.1

^Involved end-flue rehabilitation.2

cLarry car equipped with jumper pipe located on push side.

-------
                TABLE  2.   ARMCO  INC./HOUSTON WORKS IN HOUSTON,  TX

              COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:3
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
  NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
  OVEN HEIGHT  (ft-in.):
  OVEN LENGTH  (ft-in.):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:

COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:

LID LIFTER MECHANISM:

DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:

GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:

COAL CHARGING  SEQUENCE:

CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
No. I1

Koppers-Becker2
19432
19762

471
37
18
13-131
40-1I1
                      No.  21

                      Koppers-Becker2
                      19531
                      19772

                      151
                      37
                      18
                      13-131
                      40-111
1,045 (both batteries combined)^
  840 (both batteries combined)^
                      Larry car1

                      Turntable7

                      Manual7
Larry

Turntable7

Manual7
Stage charging**'
                      Stage charging^
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2

"Larry cars equipped with jumper pipe  located  on  push  side.7

-------
            TABLE  3.  ARMCO  INC./MIDDLETOWN WORKS  IN  MIDDLETOWN,  OH
                                COKE PLANT NO. 2

              COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
  NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
  OVEN HEIGHT  (ft-in.):
  OVEN LENGTH  (ft-in.):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:

COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:

LID LIFTER MECHANISM:

DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:

GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:

COAL CHARGING  SEQUENCE:

CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL  SYSTEM:
           No. I1

           Wilputte1'9
           19532,10
           761
           34,9
           28,9
           13-61
           43-9!
5,150 (Coke Plants No. 2 and 3 combined)6
4,890 (Coke Plants No. 2 and 3 combined)6
           Larry

        Screw feed; H turntable9
           Automatic
                    11
           Independent^

           Manual^

           No. 3, No. 1, No. 29

           Stage charging^
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

-------
             TABLE  4.   ARMCO  INC./MIDDLETOWN WORKS IN MIDDLETOWN,  OH
                                COKE PLANT NO. 3
              COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
  NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
  OVEN HEIGHT  (ft-in.):
  OVEN LENGTH  (ft-in.):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:

COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:3

LID LIFTER MECHANISM:

DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:

GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:

COAL CHARGING  SEQUENCE:

CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
No.
Dravo-Still1'12
19761
49.12
28,9
19-81
52-61
See previous page"


Larry car*

Screw feedH'l2

Automat ic^.H

Simultaneous-*

Manual-*

1 and 4, 2 then 312
No. 21'12

Dravo-Stilll'12
19771
49,12
28,9
19-81
52-61
Larry carl

Screw feedll>12

Automatic9jH

Simultaneous^

Manual-*

1 and 4, 2 then 312
Both Larry cars are equipped  for both
sequential or stage charging'."
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aStainless steel construction of hoppers,  drop  sleeves  and  screw feeders.

-------
         TABLE  5.   BETHLEHEM STEEL CORP./BETHLEHEM PLANT IN BETHLEHEM, PA

               COKE OVEN  CHARGING  PROCESS  AND  EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
  NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (m):
  OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:

COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:

LID LIFTER MECHANISM:

DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:

GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:

COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:

CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
2A2
2B2
3A2
3B2
Koppers-Becker (all four batteries)^
19412       19412       j.9422       19422
     102b>1»16
4 (each, all four batteries)!**
1 (each, all four batteries)16
3 (each, all four batteries)2
5,840 (all six batteries combined)6
5,058 (all six batteries combined)6

Larry car (all four batteries)16

Gravity feed (all four batteries)16

Manual (all four batteries)16



Manual (all four batteries)16



Stage charging (all four batteries)1^
                                   (continued)

-------
                              TABLE 5  (continued)




              COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
COKE PRODUCTION:
RATED TONS/DAY:
TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
52,14
Koppers-Becker2
1953a>2

802,12
516
12,17
42,12


See previous
9
Larry car^-
Gravity feedl6
Manual16
A2
McKee-Otto2
19762

802
416
22,17
62


page6
9
Larry car^
Gravity feedi6
Automatic^6
DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:




GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:




COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:




CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
Manual
      16
ManualI6
Stage charging^      Stage charging!7
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:




aBattery 5 rebuilt in 1977.15




bBatteries 2A and 2B combined.




cBatteries 3A and 3B combined.

-------
      TABLE 6.  BETHLEHEM STEEL CORP./BURNS HARBOR PLANT IN CHESTERTON, IN

              COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in. ):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
No. I1
Wilputte1
19698,18
1980a» 19
1982b>19
821
418
l8, 18
20-5"
50-718
No. 21
Koppers1
19728»18
19728>18

821
418
28
20-518
50-7 18
COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:

COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:

LID LIFTER MECHANISM:

DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:

GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:

COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:

CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
6,670 (both batteries combined)**
5,179 (both batteries combined)^
Larry car1

Screw feed18

Automatic18

Simultaneous18

Mechanical19

1-4-2-318
Larry car1

Screw feed18

Automatic18

Simultaneous18

Mechanical19

1-4-2-318
Stage charging0>19    Stage charging19
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

alnvolved changing steam nozzles, i.e., increasing aspiration, and rebuilding
 battery top.19

"Scheduled shutdown for rebuild, i.e., double collector mains  to be
 installed.19
°Larry car equipped with jumper pipe located on push side.
                                                           18

-------
        TABLE 7.  BETHLEHEM STEEL CORP./JOHNSTOWN PLANT IN JOHNSTOWN, PA

              COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:a>b

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
  NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
  OVEN HEIGHT  (m):
  OVEN LENGTH  (ft-in.):

COKE PRODUCTION:0

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:

COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:

LID LIFTER MECHANISM:

DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:

GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:

COAL CHARGING  SEQUENCE:

CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL  SYSTEM:
          No. 1811

          Koppers20
          195120,21

          198220,22
          7720,21
          323
          12,20
          3.5;2* 42
3,500 (for three battery operation)**
3,028 (for three battery operation)^

          Larry car2

          Gravity feed20

          Manual20

          Simultaneous20
          Stage charging** > 23
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery No. 18 located in designated  area known  as  the  Franklin Plant.
 Battery Nos.  17 and  19 (total—151 ovens) also in the Franklin Plant, were
 shut down in  1977 due to a  flood.20

"Johnstown facility also contained battery Nos. 15 and 16  (total—88  ovens),
 designated as the Rosedale  Plant, which were  shut down  in 1977 due to a
 flood.20

cProduction data shown for the  Franklin Plant  prior  to the shutdown of
Battery Nos. 17 and 19.6

"Larry car equipped with jumper pipe  located on coke side.20>23

-------
        TABLE  8.   BETHLEHEM  STEEL  CORP./LACKAWANNA PLANT IN LACKAWANNA,  NY

               COKE  OVEN  CHARGING  PROCESS  AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
No. 7 2
Wilputte2
19522


762,26.
325
125,26
12-226
40-726
No. 82
Wilputte2
19612
1980b>25

762,26
325
125,26
12-226
40-726
No. 92
Wilputte2
19692

1982c,25
762,26
325
!25,26
20-426
48-326
COKE PRODUCTION:d

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:

COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:

LID LIFTER MECHANISM:

DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:

GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:

COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:

CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
  8,140 (for seven battery operation)6
  6,908 (for seven battery operation)6

Larry car^     Larry car^     Larry care»
Manual26
Manual26
Manual26
Manual26
Automatic26
Manual26
Stage charging (all three batteries)^>2->>26
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery Nos. 3, 4, 5 and 6 were shut down  in  1977.26

^Battery was completely rebuilt.2^

cScheduled shutdown for rebuild.2^

"Production data appears to be prior to  1977 battery shutdowns.6

eSpare larry car equipped with a scrubber  (installed in  1970) also
 available. -*

*Larry cars equipped with jumper pipes located on  push side.2-'

-------
   TABLE 9.  BETHLEHEM STEEL CORP./SPARROWS POINT PLANT IN SPARROWS POINT, MD

              COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
  NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
  OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:

COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:

LID LIFTER MECHANISM:

DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:

GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:

COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:

CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
No. I2     No. 22
No. 32
No. 42


19782

1985b>27
632
Koppers (all four batteries)2
I9602      19612      19512

1985b,27   I985b>27   1982C>27
632        602        632
4(each, all four batteries)2"
l(each, all four batteries)2>27
3(each, all four batteries)2
43-0(each, all four batteries)1
5,500 (all eight batteries combined)27


Larry car (all four batteries)2

Gravity feed (all four batteries)27

Manual (all four batteries)27
Stage charging (all four batteries)***27
                                   (continued)
                                      10

-------
                               TABLE  9  (continued)

              COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:8

  MANUFACTURER:

  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
  NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
  OVEN LENGTH (ft~in.):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:

COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:

LID LIFTER MECHANISM:

DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:

GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:

COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:

CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
No. 52     No. 62     No. II2    No. 122

Koppers2   Koppers2   Koppers-   Koppers-
                       Becker2    Becker2
19782      19532      19552      19572

1985b,27   1982C»27
632        632        652        652
4(each, all four batteries)28
!2,27      !2,27      22.27      i27,28
32         32         42         42
43-0(each, all four batteries)1
           See previous page2'


   Larry car (all four batteries)2

   Gravity feed (all four batteries)27

   Manual (all four batteries)27
Stage charging (all four batteries)^*27
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery Nos. 9 and 10 were shut down in early 1981.27

%ew Battery A to startup in Dec. 1981; new Battery B scheduled to startup
 in Dec. 1985 will replace Battery Nos. 1, 2, 4, and 5.27

cPlant has the option to either shut down Battery Nos. 3 and 6 in 1982, or
 continue their operation until 1985.27

^Larry car equipped with jumper pipe located on coke side for all batteries,
 except No. II.28
                                       11

-------
             TABLE 10.  CF&I STEEL CORP./PUEBLO PLANT IN PUEBLO, CO

              COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in. ):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
Bl
Koppers2
197229


65l
42
28
13-030
43-230
ci
Koppers2
19742,29


. , 471
430
28
13-030
43-230
Dl
Koppers-Beckefl
19608
1974a»2

311
430
2a,29
13-030
43-230
COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:

COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:

LID LIFTER MECHANISM:

DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:

GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:

COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:

CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL
SYSTEM:
      Larry car (all three batteries)^

      Screw feed (all three batteries)29

      Automatic (all three batteries)29

      Simultaneous (all three batteries)29

      Automatic (all three batteries)29

2-3, then 1-4, and 2-3 (all three batteries)29

Sequential - stage charging (all three
batteries29
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation, and converting from single to double
                 9 9Q                           -«-»«-•
 collector mains.*•>*•*
                                      12

-------
           TABLE 11.   FORD MOTOR CO./RIVER ROUGE PLANT  IN DEARBORN, MI

              COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:8

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
  NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
  OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:

COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:

LID LIFTER MECHANISM:

DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:

GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:

COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
Koppers-Becker2>31
Wilputte2,31
1972L32
1979C»2
45!
332
2l»32
13-31
40-41
131
332
2L32
13-31
40-41
4,340 (all five batteries combined)6
3,945 (all five batteries combined)6
Larry carl

Screw feed32

Manual32

Independent32

Manual32
Larry carl

Screw feed32

Manual32

Independent32

Manual32
cokeside, pushside,  cokeside, pushside,
then center32        then center32
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:  Modified stage charging (both batteries)32
                                   (continued)
                                      13

-------
                                  Koppers-Becker (all three batteries)2.31
                                  1937d,l         19396'1         19631
                                  1979C»2         1977C»2
6ll
332
21.32
13-31
40-41
61 1
332
2l>32
13-31
40-41
251
332
21.32
13-31
40-41
                               TABLE 11 (continued)

               COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA


BATTERY DESIGNATION:41

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:'
  NO. OF OVENS:
  NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
  NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
  OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:

COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:

LID LIFTER MECHANISM:

DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:

GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:

COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:


CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
                                           See previous page^


                                  Larry car (all three batteries)!

                                  Screw feed (all three batteries)32

                                  Manual (all three batteries)32

                                  Independent (all three batteries)32

                                  Manual (all three batteries)32

                                  cokeside, pushside, then center (all three
                                  batteries)32

                                           Modified stage charging
                                           (all three batteries)3-*
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery D pushed empty in 1972.32

^Battery rebuilt in 1964; 16 ovens have been hot and empty since 1964.1>32

clnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2

dBattery rebuilt in 1962.1

eBattery rebuilt in 1963.1
                                       14

-------
       TABLE 12.  INLAND STEEL CO./INDIANA HARBOR WORKS IN E. CHICAGO, IN
                                COKE PLANT NO. 2

              COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
  NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
  OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:

COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:

LID LIFTER MECHANISM:

DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:


GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:

COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:

CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
No. 61
No. 71
No. 81
Koppers-Becker (all three batteries)^
19501          !956l
               19743,2
651
433
134
12-01
37-71
871
433
l3*
12-Ql
37-71
871
433
!34
12-Ql
37-71
6,170 (all five batteries combined)6
5,640 (all five batteries combined)6

Larry car (all three batteries)!

Gravity feed (all three batteries)33

Manual (all three batteries)33

Independent and simultaneous
  (all three batteries)33

Automatic (all three batteries)3^

1,4,3,2 (all three batteries)33

        Sequential charging
     (all three batteries)'',33
                                   (continued)
                                    15

-------
                              TABLE 12 (continued)

              COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
  NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
  OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:

COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:

LID LIFTER MECHANISM:

DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
No. 91

  Koppers-Becker (both batteries)2
19591
871
433  '
                       No. 101

                       battei
                       19701
                       433
12 -Ql
37-71
See previous page*>


Larry car*

Gravity feed33

Manual33
                       20-01
                       37-41
                       Larry carc»l

                       Screw feed34

                       Automatic34
    Independent and simultaneous
      (both batteries)33*34
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

Automatic34
1,4, 3, 233
Sequential
charging^3 »33
Automatic34
1,4,3,
Stage
chargi
233,34

ngl9,35
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.^

^Larry car equipped with jumper pipe located on coke side.

cLarry car equipped with scrubber controls used between 1970-1979.19,35
                                      16

-------
       TABLE 13.  INLAND STEEL CO./INDIANA HARBOR WORKS IN E. CHICAGO, IN
                           COKE PLANTS  NO.  3a  AND 4b

              COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
  NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
  OVEN HEIGHT  (ft-in.):
  OVEN LENGTH  (ft-in.):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:

COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:

LID LIFTER MECHANISM:

DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:

GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:

COAL CHARGING  SEQUENCE:

CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL  SYSTEM:

  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
Koppers^
19741,36
1979c,36
28,36
20-21
47-111
2,5006
1.5626

Pipeline-*-
Venturi scrubber37

Air Pol37
197415,38
• 21,000-77,370 acfm  (design range)37
• Design temperature  = 550°F
• One I.D.  fan required37
• Adjustable throat can vary Ap  from
  10-55 in. W.G.37
• Test Data (1977):37
  27,223 acfm at  183°F (North stack)
                                   (continued)
                                      17

-------
                              TABLE 13 (continued)
                           COKE PLANTS NO.  3a AND 4b

              COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
  NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
  OVEN HEIGHT  (ft-in.):
  OVEN LENGTH  (ft-in.):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:

COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:

LID LIFTER MECHANISM:

DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:

GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:

COAL CHARGING  SEQUENCE:

CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
111

Koppers^
19781,36
691,36

28,36
20-01
47-111
3.0146
2.7406

Pipeline1
Venturi scrubber39 ,40

Air Pol39
• Two preheater units, each controlled
  by individual scrubber39'4"
• Test Data (1981);41
  21,000 acfm at 180°F (No. 1 preheater
  scrubber unit)
• Test Data (1979) ;40
  42,000 acfm from each scrubber exhaust
  stack
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery No. C1

bBattery No. II1

clnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.36
                                     18

-------
             TABLE  14.   INTERLAKE  INC./RIVERDALE  PLANT IN CHICAGO,  IL

               COKE OVEN CHARGING  PROCESS  AND  EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in. ):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
No. I15
Wilputte1
1956;1 19578
1979a,2

502,8
342
l8,43
12-81
40-8 l
No. 215
Wilputte1
19571
1979a>2

502,8
342
l8,43
12-81
40-81
COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:

COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:

LID LIFTER MECHANISM:

DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:

GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:

COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:

CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
      1 1,740 (both batteries combined)6'44
1,460 (both batteries combined)6
Larry car1

Gravity feed43'44

Automatic4-'
Larry car1

Gravity feed43.44

Automatic4-*
Stage chargingb»42»45     Stage chargingb>42»45
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2'42

^Larry cars equipped with jumper pipe located on coke  side.44
                                    19

-------
    TABLE 15.  JONES & LAUGHLIN STEEL CORP./ALIQUIPPA WORKS IN ALIQUIPPA, PA

              COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:8

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
  NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
  OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):

COKE PRODUCTION:4

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:

COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:

LID LIFTER MECHANISM:

DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:

GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:

COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:

CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
Koppers-Becker^
19451
197848

1061
347
18,47
13-01
40-51
4,308 (both batteries combined)46
3,500 (both batteries combined)*7

Larry car^-

Gravity feed*6

Manual47

Independent and simultaneous47

Manual47

3, then 1, then 247

Sequential charging^*47


(continued)
                                      20

-------
                               TABLE  15  (continued)

              COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:*

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
  NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-ln.):
  OVEN LENGTH (ft-ln.):

COKE PRODUCTION:d

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:

COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:

LID LIFTER MECHANISM:

DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:

GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:

COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:

CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
A-515.1

Koppers
19762»8
561
417
2c,47
20-61
50-71
See previous
Pipeline - Coaltek System38
Wet Scrubbers^8

AAF*9
197615,38
    •  Preheaters designed to heat 100 tons of coal/hr to 500°F^9
    •  Coal preheating via two identical, parallel, independent systems (Nos- 1
       and 2)49
    •  Ap (scrubber throat) «= 21 in. W.G. (normal)^9
    •  I.D. fan rated at 40,000 acfra.49
                                   (continued)
                                      21

-------
                              TABLE 15 (continued)

              COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
    Test Data (1978)!48
    Inlet - 303 dry, std., Nm3/m
    Outlet - 247-312 dry, std., Nm3/m
    Test Data (1977);49
    Preheater stack No. 1—10,500 dsfm; T = 176°F (avg.)
    Preheater stack No. 2—7,600 dsfm; T = 193°F (avg.)
    Test Data (1976);50
    Inlet (range) - 39,212-43,100 acfm @ 487-501°F
    Outlet (range) = 23,389-42,070 acfm @ 180-186°F
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS

aBatteries A-3 and A-4 were shut down In 1980.46,47

bBattery A-5 replaced Battery A-2 in 1975-1976.47

cBoth collector mains on coke side.4'

"^Production data for a four battery operation (A-l, A-3, A-4, and A-5)
  6,946 (rated tons/day), 4,506 (typical tons/day).6

eLarry car equipped with jumper pipe located on coke side.47
                                     22

-------
     TABLE 16.   JONES & LAUGHLIN STEEL CORP./CAMPBELL WORKS IN CAMPBELL, OH

              COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in. ):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
No. 71
Wilputte1
19548


761
351
28
13-01
43-0 L
No. 91
Wilputte1
19588


761
351
28
13-01
43-01
COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:

  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:

COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:

LID LIFTER MECHANISM:

DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:

GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:

COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:

CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
        4,000;1 3,816
(for a three battery operation)"
3,483 (for a three battery operation)"
Larry car1

Turntable52

Manual52



Manual51

1 and 3, then 251

Stage charging51
Larry car1

Turntable52

Manual52



Manual51

1 and 3, then 251

Stage charging51
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery No. 8 was shut down on June 5, 1981.
                                   23

-------
          TABLE 17.   JONES & LAUGHLIN STEEL CORP./INDIANA HARBOR WORKS
                     IN E. CHICAGO,  IN

              COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION :a
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE: .
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in. ):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
No. 41
Koppers-Becker^
19562,54
1976b»53

751
353,54
l8,54
13-OL54
40-&54
No. 91
Koppers-Becker^
19611.53
1979b,2

8?1
353,54
l8,54
13-OL54
40-654
COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:

  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:

COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:

LID LIFTER MECHANISM:

DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:

GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:

COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:

CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
        4.050;1 4,000
(for a three battery operation)"
3,406 (for a three battery operation)"
Larry car1

Gravity feed53
Siraultaneous53
Larry car1

Gravity feed53



Simultaneous53
1, 2 and 454          1, 2 and 454

Stage charging0»55    Stage charging0»55
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery No. 3 is permanently shut down.53

^Involved end-flue rehabilitation.2

cLarry car equipped with jumper pipe located on No. 3 port.54
                                    24

-------
            TABLE 18.  JONES & LAUGHLIN STEEL CORP./PITTSBURGH WORKS
                       IN PITTSBURGH, PA
              COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
  NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.)'
  OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:

COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:

LID LIFTER MECHANISM:

DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:

GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:

COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:

CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
Pll
Wilputte1
19601
ATE: 197956
591
356
18,57
13 -Ql
40-91
P21
Wilputte1
19611
1977a>2
591
356
18,57
13-01
40-91
                              P3N1

                              Wilputte1
                              19611
                              1980a>56

                              591
                              356
                              18,57
                              13-01
                              40-91
5,300 (all five batteries combined)6
5,230 (all five batteries combined)6

Larry car (all three batteries)1

Gravity feed (all three batteries56

Manual (all three batteries)57

Independent (all three batteries)5?

Manual (all three batteries)5'



Stage charging (all three batteries)56
                                   (continued)
                                      25

-------
                              TABLE 18 (continued)

              COKE OWN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
  NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
  OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:

COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:

LID LIFTER MECHANISM:

DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:

GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:

COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:

CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

DATE:
rE:
3:
pa^1 fis
Wilputte1
19611
1978a>2
591
356
18,57
13-01
40-91
P41
Koppers-Becker2
19531
I977a»2
791
356
18,57
13-01
40-61
   See previous page6
Larry car56

Gravity feed56

Manual5'

Independent5'

Manual5'
Larry car56

Gravity feed56

Manual57

Independent57

Manual57
Stage charging56    Stage charging56
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.
                                      26

-------
                  TABLE 19.  KAISER STEEL CORP. IN FONTANA, CA

              COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
  NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
  OVEN HEIGHT  (ft-in.):
  OVEN LENGTH  (ft-in.):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:

  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:

COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:

LID LIFTER MECHANISM:

DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:

GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:

COAL CHARGING  SEQUENCE:

CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
Koppers-Becker^
194258
197358
B1

Koppers-Becker^
194258
197358
45!
358
28
13-058
40-558
451
358
28
13-058
40-558
      4.250;1 4,100
(all seven batteries combined)"
3,800 (all seven batteries combined)6
Larry

Gravity feed58

Mechanical58

Simultaneous58
Larry

Gravity feed58

Mechanical-*"

Simultaneous58
No. 1, 3, 258       No. 1, 3, 258

Stage charging58    Stage charging58
                                   (continued)
                                    27

-------
                              TABLE 19 (continued)

              COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
  NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
  OVEN HEIGHT  (ft-in.):
  OVEN LENGTH  (ft-in.):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:

COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:

LID LIFTER MECHANISM:

DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:

GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:

COAL CHARGING  SEQUENCE:

CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL  SYSTEM:
Koppers-Becker^
194958
1976b«58

451
358
2«
13-058
40-5^8
Koppers-Becker^
195258
1979-801'58

451
352
28
13-058
40-558
   See previous page-"-'"
Larry

Gravity feed58

Mechanical-*"

Siraultaneous58
Larry car-'-

Gravity feed58

Mechanical58

Simultaneous58
No. 1, 3, 258       No. 1, 3, 258

Stage charging58    Stage charging58
                                   (continued)
                                    28

-------
                              TABLE 19 (continued)

              COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:

STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in. ):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-ln. ):
El
Koppers-
Becker^
195258
1978b»2

45l
358
28
13-058
40-558
Fl
Koppers-
Becker2
195858


45l
358
28
13-058
40-5 58
Gl
Koppers-
Becker2
195858


451
358
28
13-058
40-558
COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:

COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:

DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:

GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:

COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:

CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
       See previous
Larry car (all three batteries)^
Gravity
feed58
Turntable58    Turntable58
Mechanical (all three batteries)58

Simultaneous (all three batteries)58



No. 1,3,2 (all three batteries)58

Stage charging (all three batteries)58
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

alnvolved trimwork.58

^Involved end-flue rehabilitation.58
                                       29

-------
                TABLE 20.  LONE STAR STEEL CO. IN LONE STAR, TX

              COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
  NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
  OVEN HEIGHT  (m):
  OVEN LENGTH  (ft-in.):

COKE PRODUCTION:15

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:

COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:

LID LIFTER MECHANISM:

DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:

GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:

COAL CHARGING  SEQUENCE:

CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
Koppers^
197915
7024
47,60
27,61
527,24
1,2146
  6906

Larry car
60
Gravity feed?

Automatic? »^2

Independent^



1-4-2-360

Stage charging?
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBatteries A  and B  (total—78  ovens) were  shut  down  in  1979.?

"Production data appears to be for  the  old batteries.^>?
                                   30

-------
      TABLE 21.   NATIONAL STEEL CORP./GREAT LAKES STEEL DIV. IN ECORSE, MI
                                COKE PLANT NO. 2

              COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
No. 31
Wilputte1
19542,64

1982b>5
70r
364
25,64
13-21
40-81
No. 41
Wilputte1
19562>64
1974a,63
781'63
363
25,64
13-2 l
40-81
COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:

COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:

LID LIFTER MECHANISM:

DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:

GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:

COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:

CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL  SYSTEM:
2,500 (both batteries combined)6
2,500 (both batteries combined)6
Larry car
Larry car1

Turntable63

Simultaneous63
Stage charging1    Stage charging1
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.63

"Scheduled shutdown for rebuild, and eventual startup in 1985.-
                                    31

-------
      TABLE 22.  NATIONAL STEEL CORP./GREAT LAKES STEEL DIV. IN ECORSE, MI
                                COKE PLANT NO. 3

              COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
  NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
  OVEN HEIGHT  (ft-in.):
  OVEN LENGTH  (ft-in.):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:

COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:

LID LIFTER MECHANISM:

DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:

GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:

COAL CHARGING  SEQUENCE:

CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL  SYSTEM:
No. 51

Otto64
19701'64
851'64
464,65
ia,2,64
20-5l
40-6; 50-764
3.412:64 2.9006
2,700°
Larry
Automatic"-'
Automatic6-*
Stage charging*1 »64
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aScheduled upgrading  in  future  will  involve  the  addition of  second
 collector main.64

^Larry  car equipped with jumper pipe located on  coke  side.64
                                   32

-------
TABLE 23.  NATIONAL STEEL CORP./GRANITE CITY STEEL DIVISION IN GRANITE CITY, IL

              COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
  NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
  OVEN HEIGHT  (ft-in.):
  OVEN LENGTH  (ft-in.):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:

COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:

LID LIFTER MECHANISM:

DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:

GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:

COAL CHARGING  SEQUENCE:

CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
          66
McKee-Otto
198066»67
4566
466
266,67
14-Q66
40-666
760-85366

Larry car66

Screw feed66,67

Automatic5 »66

Independent5



1 and 4, 2 then 366

Stage charging66
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aPlant formerly operated Batteries B and C which contained 49 and 61
 ovens, respectively.  These batteries are currently being rebuilt (similar to
 Battery A), and will contain 45 and 47 ovens, respectively.66

"This battery replaced a similar type Koppers-Becker battery containing 27
 ovens.67
                                   33

-------
        TABLE  24.   NATIONAL  STEEL  CORP./WEIRTON  STEEL  DIV.  IN WEIRTON, WV
              COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3

  MANUFACTURER:

  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
  NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
  OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:

  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:


TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:

COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:


LID LIFTER MECHANISM:

DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:

GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:

COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
M-7l
M-81
4,500 (Mainland, four
battery operation)^>6
4,066 (Mainland, four
battery operation)^ »6

Larry car-'-     Larry car^-

               Gravity
               feed68
1 and
4,2,369
1 and
4,2,369
I-ll
Koppers-
Becker2
19511

198269
61 1
469
12
13-21
40-91
Koppers-
Becker2
195368
1977b>68

4ll
469
!&8
13-21
40-6&8
Koppers-
Becker2
197368
1979C»2

87l
469
2&8.70
20-468
47-368
               3.6006

               3,0006


               Larry car^-

               Screw
               Automatic68    Automatic68
               Automatic68    Automatic68
1 and
4,2,369
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:  Stage charging (all three batteries)e>1>68
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBatteries M-5 and M-6 (total of 106 ovens) were shut down in Sept.-Oct.
 1980.69

^Involved end-flue rehabilitation.68

cInvolved end-wall repairs.2

^Production data for the "mainland" reflects a four battery operation
 (M-5, M-6, M-7, and M-8).6

eLarry car on Battery M-8 is equipped with jumper pipe located on coke
 side.68
                                        34

-------
     TABLE 25.  REPUBLIC STEEL CORP./SOUTHERN STEEL DISTRICT, THOMAS WORKS
                IN BIRMINGHAM, AL

              COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
  NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
  OVEN HEIGHT  (ft-in.):
  OVEN LENGTH  (ft-in.):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:

COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:

LID LIFTER MECHANISM:

DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:

GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:

COAL CHARGING  SEQUENCE:

CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
No. I1

Koppers*
194ia,l
198lb,72
473
12,73
13-01
40-0 X
1,066;6 9501
5606
Larry

Air pressure72

Manual73
1-3-2, then 472

Stage charging0*'3
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery was rebuilt in 1969.2

"Involved end-flue rehabilitation.72

cLarry cars equipped with jumper pipe located on coke side.73
                                   35

-------
         TABLE  26.   REPUBLIC  STEEL  CORP./CHICAGO DISTRICT IN CHICAGO,  IL

              COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
  NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
  OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:

COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:

LID LIFTER MECHANISM:
                   \

DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:

GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:

COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:

CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
No. I1

Wilputte1'74
19431'74

X98ia.24.66
75L74
474
iS.66
13-01
42-766
1.369:6 1.2001
1,300°
Larry
Manual45* 66
Stage chargingb>66
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery No.  1  to be replaced by a  Battery No.  2 with  60  ovens, 6 m high,
 double collector mains, 4 charge holes,  automatic  lid lifters, using  stage
 charging and rated at  1,800 tons of  coke per day.66

"Larry car equipped with a jumper pipe  located  on No.  3 charge  port.66
                                   36

-------
     TABLE 27.  REPUBLIC STEEL CORP./CLEVELAND DISTRICT IN CLEVELAND, OH
                                COKE PLANT NO. 1
              COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:8
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:b
No. I1 No. 21 No. 31
Koppers (all four batteries)1
197615 19582 19582
19722 19722
No. 41
19582
19722
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
  NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
  OVEN LENGTH (ft-In.):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:

COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:

LID LIFTER MECHANISM:

DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:

GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:

COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:


CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
51 (each, all four batteries)1
3 (each, all four batteries)7^
2 (each, all four batteries)7^
13-2 (each, all four batteries)1
41-0 (each, all four batteries)1
  2,782 (all four batteries combined)6
  2,049 (all four batteries combined)6

Larry car (all four batteries)1

Screw feed (all four batteries)76

Automatic (all four batteries)76

Independent (all four batteries)76

Manual (all four batteries)7-*

     No. 1, then No. 3, then No. 2
       (all four batteries)76

  Stage charging (all four batteries)7-*
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery No. 5 was shut down in 1975.76

^Included end-flue rehabilitation.2
                                      37

-------
     TABLE 28.  REPUBLIC STEEL CORP./CLEVELAND DISTRICT  IN CLEVELAND, OH
                                COKE PLANT NO.  2

              COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:b
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
  NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
  OVEN HEIGHT  (ft-in.):
  OVEN LENGTH  (ft-in.):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:

COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:

LID LIFTER MECHANISM:

DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:

GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:

COAL CHARGING  SEQUENCE:


CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL  SYSTEM:
No. 61

Koppers-Becker^
19522
19792
No. 71

Koppers-Becker*
19528
19792
63l
375
28,75
13-21
41-01
631
375
28,75
13-21
41-01
  1,954 (both batteries combined)6
  1,286 (both batteries combined)6
Larry

Gravity feed76

Automatic'6

Independent76

Manual75
Larry

Gravity feed76

Automatic76

Independent76

Manual75
  No. 1, then No. 3, then No. 2
      (both batteries)76

  Stage charging75  Stage charging75
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery No. 5 was shut down in 1975.76

"Included end-flue rehabilitation.2
                                   38

-------
       TABLE 29.   REPUBLIC STEEL CORP./SOUTHERN DISTRICT, GULFSTEEL WORKS
                  IN GADSDEN,  AL

              COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
No. 21
Wilputte2
194277
1973a'2

65L77
478
l8,77
42,77
37-01
No. 31
Wilputte2
I960;77 19652>8


65L77
478
18,77
42«77
37-01
COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:

  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:

COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:

LID LIFTER MECHANISM:

DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:

GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:

COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:

CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM;
       2,372;6 1.4001
   (both batteries combined)
1,785 (both batteries combined)6
Larry car1          Larry

Gravity feed77      Gravity feed77

      i77            Manual77
Manual'
Manual78
                    Manual78
Stage charging78    Stage charging78
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2

"Larry cars are equipped with a jumper pipe located on coke side.77
                                    39

-------
   TABLE  30.  REPUBLIC  STEEL CORP./CENTRAL  ALLOY  DISTRICT  IN MASSILLON,  OH

              COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
  NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
  OVEN HEIGHT  (ft-in.):
  OVEN LENGTH  (ft-in.):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:

COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:

LID LIFTER MECHANISM:

DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:

GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:

COAL CHARGING  SEQUENCE:


CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL  SYSTEM:
No. I1

Koppers^
19551

198222
379
18
13-21
41-01
576-6 5001
500°

Larry car*-

Gravity feed80

Manual80

Independent"0
No. 1, then No. 3,
then No. 280

Sequential charging''
ADDITIONAL  COMMENTS:
                                   40

-------
    TABLE 31.  REPUBLIC STEEL CORP./MAHONING VALLEY DISTRICT IN WARREN, OH

              COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATIONS

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
  NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (m):
  OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:

COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:

LID LIFTER MECHANISM:

DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:

GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:

COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:

CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
No. 481
1979
852,52
351   -
24,82
482
41-1151
1.8526
1.2796

Larry

Screw

Automatical

Independent^!

Mechanical^



Stage charging^*-
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBatteries No. 1 and 2 were shut down in March 1979.^2
                                   41

-------
    TABLE 32.   REPUBLIC  STEEL  CORP./MAHONING VALLEY DISTRICT IN YOUNGSTOWN,  OH

               COKE  OVEN CHARGING  PROCESS  AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
Al
Koppersl
X95Q1.83

1982b,15
381
351
12,51
13-21
41-01
Bl
Koppersl
!9501,83

1982b,15
651
351
12,51
13-21
41-01
ci
Kopperel
1950s »1


591
351
1;2 251
13-21
41-Ql
COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:

  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:

COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:

LID LIFTER MECHANISM:

DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:

GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:

COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
         2.970;1 2,6406
    (all three batteries combined)
 2,735 (all three batteries combined)6

Larry car (all three batteries)!

Gravity feed (all three batteries)8/*

Manual (all three batteries)8^

Simultaneous (all three batteries)8^

Manual (all three batteries)51

        Nos. 1 and 3, then No. 2
        (all three batteries)5!
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:  Stage charging (all three batteries)1.5i


ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery rebuilt in 1962.2

^Scheduled shutdown by Federal Consent Decree.15
                                    42

-------
       TABLE  33.   UNITED  STATES  STEEL  CORP./CLAIRTON WORKS  IN CLAIRTON,  PA

              COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
No. 185
Wilputte85
195585
197985

6485
485
286
13-085
37-085
No. 285
Wilputte85
195585
197985

6485
485
286
13-085
37-085
No. ^85
Wilputte85
195585
197985

6485
485
286
13-085
37-085
COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:

COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:

LID LIFTER MECHANISM:

DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:

GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:

COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
    20,780 (entire coke plant)6
    16,342 (entire coke plant)6

Larry car (all three batteries)86

Gravity feed (all three batteries)85

Manual (all three batteries)85

Simultaneous (all three batteries)86

Mechanical (all three batteries)56
   Nos. 4 and 1, then No. 3, then No. 2
       (all three batteries)85
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:  Stage charging (all three batteries)85
                                   (continued)
                                     43

-------
                              TABLE 33 (continued)

              COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
No. 785
Koppers85
195437

198422
6487
456
286
42

No. 885
Koppers"
195488

19 8422
6488
456
286
42

No. 985
Koppers85
195489

198422
6489
456
286
42

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:

COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:

LID LIFTER MECHANISM:

DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:

GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:

COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
      See previous page"


Larry car (all three batteries)8"

Gravity feed (all three batteries)85

Manual (all three batteries)85

Simultaneous (all three batteries8"

Mechanical (all three batteries)5**

      Nos. 4 and 1, then 3, then 2
        (all three batteries)85
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:  Stage charging (all three batteries)85
                                   (continued)
                                   44

-------
                              TABLE 33 (continued)

              COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
  NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
  OVEN HEIGHT  (m):
  OVEN LENGTH  (ft-in.):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:

COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:

LID LIFTER MECHANISM:

DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:

GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:

COAL CHARGING  SEQUENCE:

CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:!
No. 1585

Koppers'O
19533,90
6185,90
456
286
42
See previous pages**


Larry car°"

Gravity feed**5

Automatic*^

Simultaneous""

Mechanical-^

Nos. 1-4-3-256

Stage charging8^
                                   (continued)
                                   45

-------
                              TABLE 33 (continued)

              COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in. ):
No. 1685
Wilputte91
195091

198222
6135,91
485
286
42

No. 17 85
Wilputte92
195092

198222
61*5
485
286
492

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:

COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:

LID LIFTER MECHANISM:

DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:

GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:

COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:

CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
  See previous pages"
Larry

Gravity feed85

Manual85

Simultaneous8^

Mechanical5^

Nos. 1-4-3-256

Stage charging85
                             86
Larry car

Gravity feed85

Manual85

Simultaneous8^

Mechanical5**

Nos. 1-4-3-256

Stage charging85
                                   (continued)
                                   46

-------
                              TABLE 33 (continued)

              COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
  NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (m):
  OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:

COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:

LID LIFTER MECHANISM:

DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:

GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:

COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:

CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
No. 1985   No. 2085   No. 2185   No. 2285

  Koppers-Becker (all four batteries)85
1951"     1947b»94   194795     194696
197785                1972C>85   1973d>85

87 (each, all four batteries)85
4 (each, all four batteries)85
2 (each, all four batteries)86
52         52,94      52         596
        See previous pages"


Larry car (all four batteries)86

Gravity feed (all four batteries)85

Manual (all four batteries)85

Simultaneous (all four batteries)86

Mechanical (all four batteries56
Nos. 1-4-3-2 (all four batteries)56

Stage charging (all four batteries)85
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery No. 15 was rebuilt in 1979.2

bBattery No. 20 was rebuilt in 1978.85

clnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.85

^Involved bench-up rehabilitation.85
                                     47

-------
     TABLE  34.   UNITED  STATES  STEEL  CORP./FAIRFIELD WORKS IN FAIRFIELD,  AL

              COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE;
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
  NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
  OVEN HEIGHT  (m):
  OVEN LENGTH  (ft-in.):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:


  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:

COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:

LID LIFTER MECHANISM:

DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:

GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:

COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:

CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL  SYSTEM:
No. 297

U.S. Steel/Still2
197897
5797
497
28

47-772
No. 997

Koppers-Becker97
19588
1974b»98
c, 72
6397
497

48
41-197
              6,866
   (appears to be for
operation; i.e., Nos.
              5,930
   (appears to be for
 operation; i.e., Nos.

"Hot" Larry car2.8

Screw feed97

Automatic97

Simultaneous97

Mechanical97

1_4_2-3d)97

Buttner-Schilde-Haas
preheating process
with scrubber72>97
five battery
2,5,6,7, and 9)6

five battery
 2,5,6,7, and 9)6

Larry car8

Gravity feed97

Manual97

Simultaneous98

Mechanical73

4-l-2-3e»97

Stage Charging6»7
                                   (continued)
                                        48

-------
                              TABLE 34 (continued)

              COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
  MANUFACTURER:                      Ducon72
  DATE INSTALLED:                    197815>72
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:                • Single stage pre-
                                       heating unit"'
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery Nos. 3,4,5,6,7, and 8 were shut down in 1977, 1977, 1980, 1980,
 1979, and 1978, respectively.72'97

bBattery No. 9 was rebuilt in 1979.97

cBattery No. 9 on hot idle since Aug. 1980.72

°Nos. 1 and 4 discharge simultaneously, then Nos. 2 and 3 discharge
 s imultaneously.9 7

eNos. 4 and 1 discharge simultaneously, then No. 2 discharges, followed by
 No. 3; larry cars equipped with a coke side jumper pipe.97>9°
                                    49

-------
   TABLE 35.  UNITED STATES STEEL CORP./FAIRLESS WORKS  IN FAIRLESS HILLS, PA

              COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
No. I1
Wilputte1
19522
1978a>2

37!
399
28
13-61
41-01
No. 21
Wilputte1
19532
1978a>2

871
399
28
13-61
41-01
COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:

COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:

LID LIFTER MECHANISM:

DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:

GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:

COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:


CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
3,000 (both batteries combined)6
3,000 (both batteries combined)6
Larry car1

Turntable99

Manual99

Independent99
Larry car1

Turntable"

Manual"

Independent''
    Nos. 1 and 3, then No. 2
      (both batteries)99
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation2
                                      50

-------
          TABLE 36.  UNITED STATES STEEL CORP./GARY WORKS IN GARY, IN

              COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:

STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in. ):
No. I100
Koppers-
Becker2
19708
1979b>2

852,8
4101
22,101
62,101
47-4101
No. 215
U.S. Steel/
Still2
19758


572, 8
453
22,8
62,101
47_10101
COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:


LID LIFTER MECHANISM:

DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:

GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:

COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:

CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
11,960 (all eight batteries combined)^
 9,750 (all eight batteries combined)^
Larry car
8       Redler ("Precarbon")
        Conveyor System8*
Turntable
feed100

Automatic100'102

Simultaneous100'102

Mechanical100
Nos. 1,4,3,2
            100
                       ESPS53,101


                 197515
                 • System consists of 3
                   conveyors with each
                   conveyor controlled by
                   3 wet ESPs53,101
                 • Test Data (1978);101
                   "A" ESP—13,447 acfm at
                    295°F (avg.)
                   "B" ESP—15,649 acfra at
                    298°F (avg.)
                   "C" ESP—14,397 acfra at
                    301°F (avg.)
                                   (continued)

                                         51

-------
                              TABLE 36 (continued)

              COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:8
MANUFACTURER:

STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in. ):
No. S1^
U.S. Steel/
Still2
19768


5?2,8
453
22,8
62,101
47_10101
No. 52
Wilputte2

19542

198822
772,102
3! 01, 103
22,101
32,101
37-5101
No. 72
Wilputte2

1954101
1978b>2
198822
772,102
3101,103
22,101
32,101
37-5101
COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
          See previous page*>


Redler         Larry car**
("Precarbon")
Conveyor
System8>l°2
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:

LID LIFTER MECHANISM:

DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:

GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:

COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:

CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:  ESPs53»101
  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
197615
 (repaired-
 1981)101
• Same
  description
  as for
  Battery No.
  253,101
Larry car8
                                   (continued)

                                        52

-------
                              TABLE 36 (continued)

              COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:

STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
No. 132
Koppers-
Becker2
19512
!974b,2
198722
772,8
3101,103
1:2 2101
32,101
37-5101
No. 152
Wilputte2

19512»8
1977b»2

772,8
3101,103
12,101
32,101
37-5101
No. 162
Wilputte2

19492'8
1975b,2
198722
772,8
4101
12,101
32,101
37-5101
COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:

COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:

LID LIFTER MECHANISM:

DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:

GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:

COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:

CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
        See previous pages"


Larry car"     Larry car°     Larry car8
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
                                       53

-------
    TABLE  37.   UNITED  STATES  STEEL  CORP./LORAIN—CUYAHOGA WORKS  IN  LORAIN,  OH

               COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:

STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE: a
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:b
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in. ):
D2
Koppers-
Becker2
19572

198251
592
35
25,51
32,5
39-651
G2
Koppers-
Becker2
19562
19772

592
35
25,51
32,5
39-651
H2
Koppers-
Becker2
19552
19782

592
35
25,51
32»5
39-651
COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:

COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:

LID LIFTER MECHANISM:

DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:

GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:

COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:

CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
4,468 (all seven batteries combined)^
4,319 (all seven batteries combined)^

Larry car2      Larry carl      Larry carl

Screw feed (all three batteries)5

Automatic (all three batteries)5

Simultaneous (all three batteries)5

Manual (all three batteries)5



Stage charging (all three batteries)51
                                    (continued)
                                     54

-------
                               TABLE 37 (continued)

               COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:a
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:b
  NO. OF OVENS:
  NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
  NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (m):
  OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:

COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:

LID LIFTER MECHANISM:

DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:

GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:

COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:

CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
Wilputte (all four batteries)2
19552       19472       19472
19792       19702       19702
                        198251
592,15      592»15      592
3 (each, all four batteries)-*
2 (each, all four batteries)-*>51
3 (each, all four batteries)2'5
39-6 (each, all four batteries)51
            See previous page"


Larry car (all four batteries)2

Screw feed (all four batteries)5

Automatic (all four batteries)5

Simultaneous (all four batteries)5

Manual (all four batteries)5



Stage charging (all four batteries)5
                                      L2
19472
19702
198251
592
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2

^Batteries D, K and L are scheduled to be shut down in 1982, but have applied
 for stretch out to 1985.5
                                      55

-------
         TABLE 38.  UNITED STATES STEEL CORP./GENEVA WORKS IN PROVO, UT

              COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:              No. 1

  MANUFACTURER:

  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
  NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
  OVEN HEIGHT  (ft-in.):
  OVEN LENGTH  (ft-in.):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:

  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:

COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:

LID LIFTER MECHANISM:

DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:

GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:

COAL CHARGING  SEQUENCE:

CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
                                       1
           No. 2J
No. 31     No. 41
Koppers;1 Koppers-Becker104 (all four
 batteries)
1944;2 19501 (all four batteries)
1979a>2    1979a»2

63 (each, all four batteries)1'104
3 (each, all four batteries)104'105
lU-OjlOA !3_6l (each, all four batteries)
40-5;104 42-01 (each, all four batteries)
2 (each, all four batteries)8'104
5,000;1 3,5586 (all four batteries
 combined)
3,520 (all four batteries combined)6

Larry car (all four batteries)1

Gravity feed (all four batteries)106

Manual (all four batteries)106



Mechanical (all four batteries)105



Stage charging (all four batteries)105
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2
                                       56

-------
  TABLE  39.  WHEELING-PITTSBURGH  STEEL  CORP./MON VALLEY  PLANT IN  MONESSEN,  PA

              COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
  NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
  OVEN HEIGHT  (ft-in.):
  OVEN LENGTH  (ft-in.):

COKE PRODUCTION:d

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:

COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:

LID LIFTER MECHANISM:

DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:

GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:

COAL CHARGING  SEQUENCE:


CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL  SYSTEM:
No. 1J
No. 2J
Koppers-Becker^
37c,107
446,107
2107
13-01
43-01
Koppers-Becker^
1956b'1
191,107
4108
2107,108
13-01
43-01
1,836 (both batteries combined)6
1,332 (both batteries combined)6
Larry carl

Gravity feed107

Manual107

Simultaneous107

Manual107

Nos. 1-4-2,
then 3107
Larry car1

Gravity feedl°7

Manual107

Simultaneous107

Manual107

Nos. 1-4-2,
then 3107
Stage charging108   Stage charging
              108
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery No.  1 was rebuilt  in  1981.46»107

"Battery No.  2 was rebuilt  in  1979, which  included  conversion  from  a  3-hole,
 single collector main  to a 4-hole, double collector main battery.46,107

cBattery No.  1 originally had  74 ovens; 37 ovens were  rebuilt  in  1981, which
 included conversion  from a 3-hole, single collector main to a 4-hole double
 collector main battery.  The  remaining 37 ovens are being converted  to a
 4-hole, double collector main battery.^6*-107

production data reflects the  original two battery  (93  oven) operation.6
                                         57

-------
          TABLE 40.  WHEELING-PITTSBURGH STEEL CORP./STEUBENVILLE PLANT IN
                     EAST STEUBENVILLE, WV

                COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:

  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
  NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (m):
  OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:

COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:

LID LIFTER MECHANISM:


DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:

GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:
No. I2
Koppers2

1917b,109
IN DATE: 1978e>2
)ATE:
478
469
INS: 12,109
32,109
37-5109
No. 22
Koppers2

1917C.109
I978e>2
472,8
4&9
]2,109
32,109
37-5109
No. 32
Koppers-
Becker2
I917d,109
1978e»2
5l2,8
469
12,109
32,109
37-5109
No. 82
Koppers2

19768,109

792,8
469
18,109
62,109
47-11109
5,205;6 4,400! (all four batteries combined)
4,310 (all four batteries combined)6

Larry car (all four batteries)**

Gravity feed (all four batteries)109

Manual109   Manual109   Manual109   Auto-
                                         109
Manual69    Manual69    Manual69
                                    matic
Mechan-
ical69
                                     (continued)
                                      58

-------
                                TABLE 40 (continued)

                COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
          Stage charging
(battery Nos.  1,2 and 3)f>109
Nos. 1
and 4,
then 3,
then 2°9
Stage
charging^9
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aPlant shutdown Battery No. 4 (53 ovens) in 1977. Battery No. 5 (53 ovens)
 in 1976, and Battery No. 6 (63 ovens) in 1977.109

bBattery No. 1 rebuilt in 1955.2,8,109

cBattery No. 2 rebuilt in 1953.2«8»109

dBattery No. 3 rebuilt in 1964.28>109

elnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2

^Larry cars equipped with jumper pipe located on coke side.
                                       59

-------
                                                                                     o
                                                                                     o
                                                                                   O
                                                                                   G O
                                                                                     O
                                                                                     H
                                                                                     6
     MATERIAL IN THIS SECTION SUBJECT TO CONFIDENTIALITY
    REVIEW AND IS NOT RELEASABLE AS OF FEBRUARY 1, 1982.
   FOR INFORMATION, CONTACT L. KESARI, U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY, DIVISION OF STATIONARY SOURCE ENFORCEMENT.

-------
     TABLE  1.  ALABAMA BY-PRODUCTS  CORP./TARRANT  COKE  PLANT  IN  TARRANT, AL

              COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
  NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
  OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:

LID LIFTER MECHANISM:

DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:

GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:

COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:

CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
No. 52

Koppers-Becker72
19412»72
I96072

252
172>73
13-672
No. 62

Koppers-Becker72
194172
I96072

292
3;73 472
3.72,73
13-672
2,400 (based on a four battery operation)^
1,200 (based on a four battery operation)^
Larry car2


Air pressure72

Automatic72
1-3-2, then 472

Stage charging°>73
Larry car2


Air pressure72

Automatic72
1-3-2, then 472

Stage chargingd>73
                                   (continued)
                                   60

-------
                               TABLE  1  (continued)

              COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
  NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
  OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:

COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:

LID LIFTER MECHANISM:

DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:

GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:

COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:

CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. I;2 A72

Wilputte72
19682>72
197972
782«72
372,73
2 (piggyback)b»72>73
16-072
See previous


Pipeline0'2 or   Larry car2

                 Air pressure72

Automatic72      Automatic72
1-2, then 372

Wet ESPe>72

Mikropul72
I96072
1-2, then 372

Stage chargingd>73
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery No. 2 was permanently shut down in August 1979.72

bTwo offtakes on push side act as double collector main.73

cCoaltek pipeline charge system was installed in 1975 with a design
 capacity = 3,480 tons coal per day (operating capacity = 2,693 tons per day):
 Due to economic reasons pipeline charging is not currently used,  however
 it does operate the majority of the time under normal circumstances.72

^Larry cars equipped with jumper pipes located on coke side.72>73

eSystem replaced a wet cyclonic venturi scrubber originally installed
 in 1968.38
                                      61

-------
          TABLE 2.  ALLIED CHEMICAL CORP./ASHLAND PLANT IN ASHLAND, KY

              COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in. ):
No. 32
Wilputte2
19532
1973C»2

76 2
3110
3.2,110
4.52
40-81H
No. 4a»2
Wilputte2
b


702
3111
2110,111
4.5.2 5112
46-lQlH
COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:

COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:

LID LIFTER MECHANISM:

DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:
GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:

COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:

CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
3,480 (both batteries combined)6
2,100 (both batteries combined)6
Larry car^>2

Gravity feed1!0
                     Larry care»2

                     Gravity feed1!0

                     Manual111
Either simulta-
neous or
independent-^
1 and 3, then 2111   1 and 3, then

Stage charging (both batteries)!-^
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery No. 4 was shut down in December 1980 due to low coke demand

bBattery No. 4 was rebuilt in 1978.2

clnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2

^Designed to deliver 670 cu ft of coal via 3 hoppers.HO

eTwo larry cars almost entirely new; capacity = 1,140 cu ft/charge
                                        62

-------
                  TABLE 3.  CARONDELET COKE8  IN ST. LOUIS, MO

              COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:

STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in. ):
A114
Wilputte114

1913114
1967114

35114
4! 15
ill4
32
37_0114
B2
Simon-
Carves2
1913114
1975114

18114
4115
X114
32
37_0114
C114
Koppers114

1952114
1974114

40114
4114
lH4
32
37-0114
COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:

COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:

LID LIFTER MECHANISM:

DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:

GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:

COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:

CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
1,000 (all three batteries combined)6
800 (all three batteries combined)6

Larry car (all three batteries)^'2

Gravity feed (all three batteries)114

Manual (all three batteries)114
Sequential charging (all three
batteries)b>115
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aPlant was previously owned by Great Lakes Carbon Corp. prior to January
 1981.
   new larry car with jumper pipe to be installed in March 1981.
                                       63

-------
        TABLE 4.  CHATTANOOGA COKE AND CHEMICAL CORP./IN CHATTANOOGA, TN

              COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
  NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (m):
  OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:

COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:

LID LIFTER MECHANISM:b

DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:

GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:

COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:

CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
No. I2

Semet/Solvay116
19182
I960116
24:2
12,116
3117
42
No. 22

Wilputte116
19412
I979a»2

20 2
3117
I2,116
3117
42
576 (both batteries combined)!16

Larry car2         Larry car2

Gravity feedH7    Gravity

Automatic1!6       Automatic!16
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2
      batteries were converted from manual lid removal to automatic
 in 1980-1981. I16

cLarry cars equipped with jumper pipes located on push side.H6
                                      64

-------
           TABLE  5.   CITIZENS GAS AND  COKE UTILITY  IN  INDIANAPOLIS,  IN

              COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in. ):
E2
Wilputte2*118
19462


472
4120
12
4120
42
H2
Koppers2
19 41 2


4lH8
4120
12
4120
42
X2,118
Dravo-Still119
19792


722
3120
2119
3120
52,119
COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:

  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:


TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:

COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:

LID LIFTER MECHANISM:

DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:

GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:

COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:

CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
1,086 (E and H batteries
 combined)^
1,002 (E and H batteries
 combined)**
1,645120
Larry car (all three batteries)2,120

Gravity feed (all three batteries)!2!

Manual!2!        Manual!2!    Automatical

Independent (all three batteries)H8>l2l

Manual120        Manual20    Mechanical!20

4,l,3,2l2!       4,1,3,2121   1,3,1,2121

Stage charging (all three batteries)^'12°
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBatteries F and G, both 40 oven Wilputte batteries started up in 1926 and
 1929, respectively, were shut down in 1979.121
       car equipped with jumper pipe located on coke side (Batteries E
 and H).120
                                      65

-------
                    TABLE 6.  DETROIT  COKE  CO.  IN DETROIT, MI

              COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
  NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
  OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:b

COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:

LID LIFTER MECHANISM:

DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:

GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:

COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:

CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
No. 62

Semet/Solvay2
19682»122
1978a»2

702,122
3122
I;2.123 2 (piggyback)122
16-8122
47^122
2,1506
2.0006

Larry car122

Turntable122

Automatic123

Simultaneously12^



No. 2, then Nos. 1 and 312A

Stage charging123
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2
       to January 1980, under ownership of Allied Chem. Co., pipeline
 charging was utilized.   Preheater consisted of two units controlled by
 independent (Swemco) wet venturi scrubbers installed in 1973. 38>122, 125
                                       66

-------
                TABLE 7.  DONNER-HANNA COKE CORP. IN BUFFALO,  NY

              COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
AB2
Koppers2
19512

512
325
l2,26
4.2 226

No. 32
Koppers2
19642

502
325
!-2 276
42,26

No. 42
Koppers2
19672

502
325
1:2 226
42,26

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:
COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:

LID LIFTER MECHANISM:

DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:

GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:

COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:

CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
3,004 (all three batteries combined)6
3,004 (all three batteries combined)6

Larry car2    Larry car2    Larry car2 or
                            Pipeline26
Manual26
Automatic26   Automatic26
Stage charging (for all batteries)a»25,26
ESP on Battery No. 4 preheaterb»26
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aStage charging on Battery No. 4 when using wet coal.26

bprecarbon preheater for dry coal.26
                                      67

-------
                      TABLE  8.  EMPIRE  COKE  CO.  IN  HOLT,  AL

              COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
  NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (m):
  OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:

COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:

LID LIFTER MECHANISM:

DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:

GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:

COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:

CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
No. I2

Semet/Solvay77
1906a»77
No. 2 2

Semet/Solvay77
I906a»77
202,77
378
12,77
32,78
402,7
378
l2,77
32,78
360 (both batteries combined)6
Larry car2

Screw feed77

Manual''
Larry car2

Screw feed77

Manual77
1-3-278            1-3-278

Sequential charging (both batteries)***78
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBoth batteries were rebuilt in 1978.2

^Larry cars equipped with jumper pipes located on coke side.78
                                      68

-------
       TABLE 9.  MERCIER CORP./ERIE COKE AND CHEMICALS IN PAINESVILLE, OH

              COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
  NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (m):
  OVEN LENGTH (ft-In.):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:

COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:

LID LIFTER MECHANISM:

DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:

GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:

COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
No. I2
No. 22
Koppers-Becker2    Koppers-Becker2
1926a»126          I926a>126
232
3-127 4128
232
3-127 4128
]/
42
450 (both batteries combined)6
400 (both batteries combined)6
Larry car2

Gravity feed84

Manual84

Simultaneous84

Manual127
Larry car2

Gravity feed84

Manual84

Simultaneous84

Manual127
Nos. 1 and 4, then 3, then 2
(both batteries)128
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:     Stage charging (both batteries)127


ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery was rebuilt in 1972.2>22
                                      69

-------
          TABLE 10.   INDIANA GAS AND CHEMICAL CORP. IN TERRE HAUTE,  IN

              COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
OVEN LENGTH (ft-ln. ):
No. I2

19192
1978a»2

302
4129
I2
42
30-Q130
No. 22

19262
I978a»2

302
4129
I2
42
30_ol30
COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:

COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:

LID LIFTER MECHANISM:

DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:

GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:

COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
400 (both batteries combined)6
340 (both batteries combined)6

Larry car2         Larry car2

Gravity feed130    Gravity feed130

Automatic130       Automatic130
1 and 4, 2
and 3130
1 and 4.  2
and 3130
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:     Stage charging (both batteries)b>129


ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2

^Larry car equipped with jumper pipe located on coke side.12"
                                      70

-------
             TABLE 11.  IRONTON COKE CORP./A SUBSIDIARY OF McLOUTH
                        STEEL CORP. IN IRONTON, OH

              COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in. ):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
No. lb»2
Semet/Solvay131
19172,131
1947d,131
68131
4131,132
3.2,131
11-1131
35-6131
No. 2C>2
Wilputtel3!
1954131
1978e,131
24131
4131,132
12,131
12-2131
36-4131
COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:

COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:

LID LIFTER MECHANISM:

DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:

GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:

COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:
2,650 (for a three battery operation)6
2,223 (for a three battery operation)6

Larry car!31>132   Larry car2

Gravity feed5      Gravity feed5

                   Manual5

                   Simultaneous5
Manual5

Simultaneous5

Manual5
                   Manual5
No. 4 (coke side), No. 1 (push side),
No. 3, then No. 2 (both batteries)5
CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:     Stage charging (both batteries)f.131,132
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery No. 3 (76 ovens—Wilputte) presently shut down.5
^Battery No. 1 operating on a 48-hour coke time to keep ovens warm.5
cBattery No. 2 was shut down between January 1980 and February 1981.  During
 the shut down period the pipeline charging (Coaltek-scrubber control) system
 was replaced by larry car.  Presently the battery is on hot idle.5*131,132
^Involved the addition of ovens.131
elnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2,131
^Larry cars equipped with jumper pipe located on coke side (Battery No. 1)
 and push side (Battery No. ?.)•-
                                      71

-------
         TABLE 12.  JIM WALTER RESOURCES, INC./COKE, IRON AND CHEMICALS
                    DIVISION IN BIRMINGHAM, AL

              COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
iTTKRY DESIGNATION:8
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in. ):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
No. 32
Koppers2
19522
1979b,72

302
473
12
14-072

No. 42
Koppers2
19562
1980^,72

302
473
I2 .
14-072

No. 52
Koppers2
19592
198lb,72

602
473
I2
14-072

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:

COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:

LID LIFTER MECHANISM:

DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:

GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:

COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:

CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
2,760 (based on a five battery operation)"
2,400 (based on a five battery operation)^

Larry car (all three batteries)2

Air pressure (all three batteries)2

Automatic (all three batteries)72



Manual (all three batteries)73

1-3-2, then 4 (all three batteries)73

Stage charging (all three batteries)0»73
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery Nos. 1 and 2 were shut down in August 1980.72

^Involved standpipe replacement and top side work.72

cLarry cars equipped with jumper pipes located on coke side.73
                                   72

-------
          TABLE 13.  KOPPERS CO., INC./INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS DIVISION,
                     ERIE PLANT IN ERIE, PA

              COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATIONS
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS :c
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in. ):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
A2
Koppers2
1943b,133


232
5134
1
12-0135
42-Q135
B2
Koppers2
1943b>2


352
5134
1
12-0135
42-0135
COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:

COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:

LID LIFTER MECHANISM:

DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:

GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:

COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:

CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
730;1 6256 (both batteries combined)
600 (both batteries combined)6
Larry car2

Gravity
Independent 136
Larry car2

Gravity feed!36

Manuall36

Independentl36
Stage charging (both batteries)d»136
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aFacility previously owned and operated by Interlake, Inc.l

bBattery was rebuilt in 1971.2

cBatteries A and B to incorporate new standpipes by 1981.136

"Larry cars equipped with jumper pipe located at push side.136
                                     73

-------
    TABLE 14.  KOPPERS CO., INC./INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS DIVISION,  TOLEDO PLANT
               IN TOLEDO, OH

              COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
  NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (m):
  OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:

COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:

LID LIFTER MECHANISM:

DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:

GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:

COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:

CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
C2,137

Wilputte2
19532,137
57a,2,138
4139
]2,137
37-7137



8146
7026

Larry car2

Gravity feed140

Manual140



Manual139



Stage chargingb>138>139
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery C was on hot idle from September 1980 to August 1981.139,140

"Larry car equipped with jumper pipe located on push side.13''
                                      74

-------
   TABLE 15.   KOPPERS CO.,  INC./INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS DIVISION,  WOODWARD PLANT
              IN WOODWARD,  AL

              COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in. ):
No. I2
f\
Koppers21
197772


602,141
4141
2141
4;2 3141
39-0141
No. 2A2
Koppers2
197772


40141
4141
2141
4; 2 3141
39-0141
No. 2fi2
Koppers2
193772
1978c,72

38141
4141
!l41
4.2 3141
39_0141
COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:

COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:
LID LIFTER MECHANISM:

DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:

GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:

COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:

CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
2,047 (all five batteries combined)6
1,272 (all five batteries combined)6

Larry car2    Larry car2    Larry car2
Gravit
Manual73
Manual73
Stage charging (both
batteries)/3
Gravity
Gravity
 feedl41
Manuall41     Manuall41     Manuall41
Manual73
              Stage
              charging^*73
                                   (continued)
                                      75

-------
                              TABLE 15 (continued)

              COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
  NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
  OVEN LENGTH (ft-In.):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:

COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:

LID LIFTER MECHANISM:

DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:

GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:

COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:

CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
No. 4A and 4Bb>141   No. 5b»2
Koppers2
194972
1981c,72

582
472
]2,72
14-072
See previous page"


Larry car2

Air pressure72

Manual'2
Koppers2
195272
1978C»72

302
472
I2,72
14-072
Larry car2

Air pressure72

Manual72
Stage charging (both batteries)^>7^
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery No. 3 was permanently shut down in November 1974.72

^Battery Nos. 4A, 4B, and 5 were idling hot for a 14-month period (May 1980-
 July 1981) and were recharged in July 1981.73

clnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.72

^Larry cars equipped with jumper pipes located on coke side.7^
                                      76

-------
    TABLE 16.  MILWAUKEE SOLVEY COKE CO./DIVISION OF PICKANDS MATHER AND CO.
               IN MILWAUKEE, WI

              COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:3
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
  NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (m):
  OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:

COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:

LID LIFTER MECHANISM:

DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:

GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:

COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:


CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
No. 32
No. 42
402
3142
3.2,144
32
20-Q143
60 2
3142
12,144
32
20-01*3
800 (both batteries combined)6
725 (both batteries combined)6
Larry car2

Screw feed I4 3

Manual143

Independent^ 3
2 and 1, then
3142
Larry car2

Screw

Manual^

Independent!^

Mechanical!42

2 and 1, then
Stage charging (both
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBoth batteries were rebuilt in 1974.2

^Larry car equipped with jumper pipe located on coke side.
                                      77

-------
           TABLE 17.  PHILADELPHIA COKE CO., INC. IN PHILADELPHIA, PA

              COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
  NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (m):
  OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:

COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:

LID LIFTER MECHANISM:

DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:

GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:

COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:


CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
A/B2

Koppers-Becker145
19292
742
3145,146
1:2 2145
42
40-0145
9406
Larry car2

Gravity feed145

Manual145

Independent145

Manual145

Push side, coke side, center
port
145
Stage charging14**
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
                                      78

-------
                 TABLE  18.  TONAWANDA  COKE CORP.  IN  TONWANDA,  NY

              COKE OVEN CHARGING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  NO. OF CHARGE HOLES:
  NO. OF COLLECTOR MAINS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
  OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

TYPE OF CHARGING MECHANISM:

COAL DISCHARGE MECHANISM:

LID LIFTER MECHANISM:

DROP SLEEVE LOWERING:

GOOSENECK CLEANING MECHANISM:

COAL CHARGING SEQUENCE:

CHARGING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
No. 226

Wilputte2
19622
602
325
I2
4i-226



1.7906
9006

Larry car2

Gravity feed26
Stage charging2^
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery No. 1 was shut down in June 1972.26
                                      79

-------
     MATERIAL IN THIS SECTION SUBJECT TO CONFIDENTIALITY

    REVIEW AND IS NOT RELEASABLE AS OF FEBRUARY 1,  1982.                           "o

   FOR INFORMATION, CONTACT L. KESARI, U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL                          R

PROTECTION AGENCY, DIVISION OF STATIONARY SOURCE ENFORCEMENT.
                                                                                   o w
                                                                                   <; M
                                                                                   W bd
                                                                                   a w
                                                                                     2;
                                                                                   o o
                                                                                   Q
                                                                                   H

                                                                                   2!
                                                                                   O

-------
                                   REFERENCES

                               COKE OVEN CHARGING
1.   World Steel Industry Data Handbook:  Vol. 1.  The United States.
     McGraw-Hill Magazine.  1978.  pp. 20-25.  (Reliability No. 4.)

2.   Technical Approach for a Coke Production Cost Model.  PEDCo
     Environmental, Inc., EPA Contract No. 68-02-3071.  pp. 39-50.
     (Reliability No. 4.)

3.   EPA Region V File review by GCA/Technology Division, December 1981.

4.   Telephone conversation.  Steve Samorgin, Ohio Air Pollution
     Control-Soutwest District to Sandy Beaton, GCA/Technology Division.
     October 1981.  (Reliability No. 2.)

5.   EPA Region V Engineer's comments to GCA questionnaires, December 1981.

6.   Development Document for Proposed Effluent Limitations Guidelines and
     Standards for the Iron and Steel Manufacturing Point Source Category.
     EPA 440/l-79/024a, Draft Report Vol. II.  U.S. Environmental Protection
     Agency, Effluent Guidelines Division Office of Water and Waste
     Management, Washington DC.  October 1979.  pp. 18-49.  (Reliability
     No. 4.)

7.   Telephone conversation.  John Hepola, U.S. EPA Region VI to Michael
     Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division.  November 1981.  (Reliability No. 2.)

8.   Cost Effectiveness Model for Pollution Control of Coke Facilities.
     EPA-600/2-79-185.  Aug. 1979.  Table 8.  (Reliability No. 4.)

9.   EPA Region V Files (Notes in file).

10.  EPA Region V Files (Renewal Permit Application dated 1/26/79, No.
     1309010006P013).

11.  Alliance Machine Co. Advertisement in Iron and Steel Engineer.
     (Reliability No. 4.)

12.  Summary Data compiled by PEDCo Environmentalists, Inc., from stack test
     reports contained in regional EPA offices.  Provided to JACA Corp. for
     steel library by Tom Maslany, EPA Region III.  (Reliability No. 1.)
                                        80

-------
13.  ARMCO's Coke Batteries Scheduled for Mid-1976 Start-up.  Iron and Steel
     Engineer.  52(9):61.  September 1975.  (Reliability No. 4.)

14.  Draft Inspection Report.  Halcon Car Operation/Battery 5, Bethlehem Steel
     Corporation,  Bethlehem,  PA.  JACA Corp.  Sept. 19, 1979.  RACT Box No.
     503615-503694.  (Reliability No. 1.)

15.  Telephone conversation.   Bernard Bloom, U.S. Environmental Protection
     Agency, Division of Stationary Source Enforcement to Michael Jasinski,
     GCA/Technology Division.  (Reliability No. 2.)

16.  Telephone converstion and letter response.  Bill Nuver, Pennsylvania
     Department of Environmental Resources, Bethlehem, PA, to Sandy Beaton,
     GCA/Technology Division.  November 1981.   (Reliability No. 2.)

17.  Letter from J. McGrogan, Pennsylvania Department of Environmental
     Resources to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Divsion.  Received March 19,
     1981.  (Reliability No.  1.)

18.  Petroccia, M. et al.  Field Inspection Report.  Bethlehem Steel
     Corporation Burn Harbor Coke Batteries 1 and 2, Chesterton, Indiana.
     GCA/Technology Division-Report No. GCA-TR-80-56-G.  Prepared for U.S.
     Environmental Protection Agency.  July 1980.  (Reliability No. 1.)

19.  Telephone conversation.   Andy Sunderland, Indiana State Air Pollution
     Control to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  March 3, 1981.
     (Reliability No. 2.)

20.  Telephone conversation.   Bob Clark, Pennsylvania Department of
     Environmental Resources, Ebensburg, PA, to Michael Jasinski,
     GCA/Technology Division.  October 29, 1981.  (Reliability No. 2.)

21.  RACT Box No.  503717-403719.  (Reliability No. 1.)

22.  Computer printout prepared for U.S. EPA by PEDCo Environmentalists, Inc.
     Coke Oven Battery data compilation, received from Bernard Bloom by
     Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division.  (Reliability No. 3-4.)

23.  Telephone conversation.   Bob Clark, Pennsylvania Department of
     Environmental Resources to Gene Bergson,  GCA/Technology Division.  March
     2, 1981.  (Reliability No. 2.)

24.  Goldman, Leonard J. and David W. Coy.  Technical Support Document for
     Control of Coke Oven Fusing Emissions.  RTI Document.  RACT Box No.
     506379-506486.  (Reliability No. 1.)

25.  Telephone conversation.   Jack Hausrath, Erie County Dept. of Health, New
     York to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division. February 17, 1981.
     (Reliability No. 2.)

26.  Letter response.  Richard Craig, U.S. EPA Region II to William Farino,
     GCA/Technology Division.  November 1981.   (Reliability No. 1.)
                                        81

-------
27.  Telephone conversation.  Ralph Hall, Maryland Department of Health and
     Mental Hygiene to Michai-.l Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division.  November
     1981.  (Reliability No. 2.)

28.  Telephone conversation.  Mark Sylvester, Maryland Department of Health
     and Mental Hygiene to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division.
     February 13, 1981.  (Reliability No. 2.)

29.  Oliver, J. F. and J. T Sorve.  Control of Visible Missions at CF&I Steel
     Corporation, Pueblo, CO.  JAPCA.29(9):920-925, September 1976.
     (Reliability No. 1.)

30.  Dion, J.A., and G. A. Young.  Coke Battery Survey, CF&I Steel
     Corporation, Pueblo, CO.  EPA-330/1-78-005.  RACT No. 503469-start.
     April 1979.  (Reliability No. 1.)

31.  EPA Region V Files (confidential letter response by Ford to EPA
     questionnaire—2/21/78).

32.  Nunno, Thomas, et al.  Assessment of Air Emissions from Steel Plant
     Sources.  Ford Motor Company/Dearborn, MI.  GCA Report No. TR-81-38-G.
     Prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.  April 1981.
     (Reliability No. 1.)

33.  Spawn, Peter, et al.  Assessment of Air Emissions from Steel Plant
     Operations.  Inland Steel/Indiana Harbor Works.  GCA Report No.
     TR-80-85-G.   Prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.  August
     1980.  (Reliability No. 1.)

34.  Inland Steel Publication:  Air, Water, and Inland Steel,  pp. 34-41.
     (Reliability No. 4.)

35.  Telephone conversation.  Don Kuh, Indiana State Air Pollution Control to
     Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  March 4, 1981.  (Reliability
     No. 2.)

36.  EPA Region V Files (August 1981 letter from Inland Steel Co. to EPA).

37.  Test of the Air Pollution Scrubber System Vent Stack of the Northside
     Preheater Line at C Battery, Coke Plant No. 3.  Inland Steel Co., Inland
     Steel Central Engineering and Koppers Company Report.  RACT No. 512991.
     (Reliability No. 1.)

38.  Balch, George E.  Closed Pipeline Charging of Coke Ovens Using the
     Coaltek™ System.  Presented at the 67th Annual Meeting of the Air
     Pollution Control Assoc. in Denver.  June 1974.  (Reliability No. 4.)

39.  Inland Steel Publication:  Air Water and Inland Steel,  pp 34-41.
     (Reliability No. 4.)

40.  EPA Region V Files (1979 Tests on No. 11 battery preheater at Inland).
                                   82

-------
41.  EPA Region V Files (1981 tests on No. 1 preheater unit (Batt. 11) at
     Inland).

42.  EPA Region V Files (Trip Report at Interlake—6/80).

43.  Telephone conversation.  Mr. Sulkorowski, City of Chicago Environmental
     Department to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division.  December 10,
     1980.  (Reliability No. 2.)

44.  EPA Region V Files (Interlake 1972 Operating Permits).

45.  Telephone conversation.  Mr. Sulkorowski, City of Chicago Department of
     Inspectional Services to Marc Grant, GCA/Technology Division.  March 5,
     1981.  (Reliability No. 2.)

46.  Telephone conversation.  Ken Bowman, Pennsylvania Department of
     Environmental Resources to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.
     February 18, 1981.  (Reliability No. 2.)

47.  Petroccia, M., et al.  Assessment of Air Emissions from and Controls for
     Iron and Steel Making Sources.  Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp./Aliquippa
     Works.  GCA Report No. TR-81-57-G.  Prepared for U.S. Environmental
     Protection Agency.  May 1981.  (Reliability No. 1.)

48.  Subberland, T. K., et al•  Environmental Assessment of Emission from a
     Coal Preheater.  York Research Corporation, March 3, 1980.  Contract No.
     68-02-2819; RACT 512673.  (Reliability No. 1.)

49.  Stack Test Report No. 5877A and 5877B by PADER, testing done on 11/29/71
     on No. 1 and No. 2 Preheater Stacks, JACA Library.  (Reliability No. 1.)

50.  An Emission/Efficiency Evaluation of the A-5 Coke Oven Battery North Ree
     Heat Bleed Venturi Scrubber System at the Aliquippa Works of the Jones &
     Laughlin Steel Corporation, Pittsburgh, PA.  Betz Environmental
     Engineers.  May 1971.  (RACT 503063.)  (Reliability No. 1.)

51.  Telephone conversation.  Ted Davis, Northeast District Ohio EPA to Gene
     Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  February 27, 1981.  (Reliability
     No. 2.)

52.  EPA Region V File review by GCA,  December 1981.

53.  Telephone conversation.  Edward Wojciechowski, EPA Region V to Gene
     Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  February 4, 1981.  (Reliability No. 2.)

54.  EPA Region V Files (letter from J&L to EPA—4/78).

55.  Telephone conversation.  Don Kuh, Indiana State Board of Health to Sandy
     Beaton, GCA/Technology Division.   November 1981.  (Reliability No. 2.).

56.  Telephone conversation.  S. Banninthaya, Allegheny County Health
     Department to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  February 12, 1981.
     (Reliability No. 2.)

                                       83

-------
57.  Telephone conversation.  S. Banninthaya, Allegheny County Health
     Department to Sandy Beaton, GCA/Technology Division.  November 3, 1981.
     (Reliability No. 2.)

58.  Spawn, P. and R. Li.  Field Inspection Report.  Kaiser Steel Corporation,
     Fontanna Works.  Coke Plant, Fontana, California.  GCA/Technology
     Division Draft Final Report No. GCA-TR-80-53-G.  Prepared for U.S.
     Environmental Protection Agency.  February 1980.  (Reliability No. 1.)

59.  Current Domestic Expansion and Modernization Programs.  Iron & Steel
     Engineer, Feb. 1980.  (Reliability No. 4.)

60.  Simonson, A. V.  Report of Results for Visible Emissions Testing of the
     Lone Star Steel Coke Oven Battery, Lone Star, Texas.  Dec. 26, 1979.
     Radian Corporation.  Radian Report No. 211-001 (RACT-501518).
     (Reliability No. 1.)

61.  Telephone conversation.  Tom Blair, Radian Corp., in Austin, Texas to
     Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  March 3, 1981.  (Reliability No.
     2.)

62.  Telephone conversation.  Lawrence Pewitt, Texas Air Control Board to
     Sandy Beaton, GCA/Technology Division.  November 1981.  (Reliability
     No. 2.)

63.  EPA Region V files (NSC/GLS data supplied to EPA).

64.  EPA Region V files (GLS response to EPA questionnaire—Feb. 21, 1978).

65.  Fodor, R. J.  New Coke Oven Facilities at Great Lakes Steel.  Iron &
     Steel Engineer.  48(9):79-84.  September 1971.  (Reliability No. 3.)

66.  Telephone conversation.  Anton Telford, Illinois Environmental Protection
     Agency to Sandy Beaton, GCA/Technology Division.  November 1981.
     (Reliability No. 2.)

67.  Formadley, Robert J.  Granite City:  Bold Modernization of an Integrated
     Steel Plant.  Iron & Steel Engineer, August 1980.  pp. S1-67-SL-80.
     (Reliability No. 4.)

68.  Spawn, Peter, et al.  Assessment of Air Emissions from Iron & Steelmaking
     Sources.  National Steel Corp./Weirton Steel Division.  GCA Report No.
     TR-81-118-G.  Prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
     Novebmer 1981.  (Reliability No. 1.)

69.  Telephone conversation.  John Raggi, West Virginia Air Polluton Control^
     to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  February 17, 1981.
     (Reliability No. 2.)

70.  Building 87-oven Coke Battery at Weirton.  Iron & Steel Engineer.
     December 1970, p. 139.  (Reliability No. 4.)
                                        84

-------
71.  Weirton Steel Division—Brown's Island Coke Plant.  Iron & Steel
     Engineer.  January 1977.  p. 61.  (Reliability No. 4.)

72.  Letter response.  Paul Pate, Director, Jefferson County Department of
     Health to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division.  December 1981.
     (Reliability No. 1.)

73.  Telephone conversation.  Veda Hampton, Jefferson County Department of
     Health to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  February 25, 1981.
     (Reliability No. 2.)

74.  EPA Region V files (Report prepared by Arthur D. Little, Inc. regarding a
     new coke battery at RSC-1978).

75.  Telephone conversation.  Mr. Habib, Cleveland Air Pollution^ Control to
     Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  February 27, 1981.  (Reliability
     No. 2.)

76.  Telephone conversation.  Mr. Habib, Cleveland Air Pollution Control to
     Sandy Beaton, GCA/Technology Division.  November 1981.  (Reliability
     No. 2.)

77.  Telephone conversation.  Sue Robertson, Alabama State Air Pollution
     Control to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division.  November 1981.
     (Reliability No. 2.)

78.  Telephone conversation.  Sue Robertson, Alabama State Air Pollution
     Control to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  February 25, 1981.
     (Reliability No. 2.)

79.  Telephone conversation.  Andy Pasko, Canton City Department of Health to
     Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  March 5, 1981.  (Reliability
     No. 2.)

80.  Telephone conversation and letter response.  Andy Pasko, Canton City
     Department of Health to Sandy Beaton, GCA/Technology Division.  November
     1981.  (Reliability No. 1.)

81.  Letter communication.  Anthony F. Fazio, Vice President, Chemico Air
     Pollution Control Corporation, Division of Envirotech Corporation to
     Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division.  December 1980.

82.  EPA Region V files (Trip Report by Dan Balk (February 20, 1980).

83.  EPA Revion V files (1974 permits).

84.  Letter response.  Dennis Bush.  Ohio Environmental Protection Agency—
     Northeast District to Sandy Beaton, GCA/Technology Division.  November
     1981.  (Reliability No. 1.)
                                        85

-------
85.  Spawn, P. et al., Field .Inspection Report, GCA/Technology Division.
     Report No. TR-80-30-G.  Prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection
     Agency.  April 1980.  (Reliability No. 1.)

86.  Numson, et al.  Emission Control in Coke Operations by Use of Stage
     Charging.  24(11):1059.  November 1974.   (Reliability No. 1.)

87.  Source Sheet on USSC Clairton Coke Battery No. 7.  RACT-500478
     (Reliability No. 1.)

88.  Source Sheet on USSC Clairton Coke Battery No. 8.  RACT-500484
     (Reliability No. 1.)

89.  Source Sheet on USSC Clairton Coke Battery No. 9.  RACT-500490
     (Reliability No. 1.)

90.  Source Sheet on USSC Clairton Coke Battery No. 15.  RACT-500526
     (Reliability No. 1.)

91.  Source Sheet on USSC Clairton Coke Battery No. 16.  RACT-500528
     (Reliability No. 1.)

92.  Source Sheet on USSC Clairton Coke Battery No. 17.  RACT-500541
     (Reliability No. 1.)

93.  Source Sheet on USSC Clairton Coke Battery No. 19.  RACT-500553
     (Reliability No. 1.)

94.  Source Sheet on USSC Clairton Coke Battery No. 20.  RACT-500562
     (Reliability No. 1.)

95.  Source Sheet on USSC Clairton Coke Battery No. 15.  RACT-500569
     (Reliability No. 1.)

96.  Source Sheet on USSC Clairton Coke Battery No. 15.  RACT-500581
     (Reliability No. 1.)

97.  Spawn, P., et al., Field Inspection Report.  USSC Fairfield Works Coke
     Plant, Fairfield, Alabama.  GCA/Technology Division Final Report
     TR-79-59-G.  Prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.  November
     1980.  (Reliability No. 1.)

98.  Coke Battery Survey Procedures Description and Data Presentation.  USSC
     Fairfield Works, Fairfield, Alabama.  December 1977.  EPA-330/1-77-012.
     RACT No. 501519 (start).  (Reliability No. 1.)

99.  Telephone conversation and letter response.  Tom McGinley, Pennsylvania
     Department of Environmental Resources to Sandy Beaton, GCA/Technology
     Division.  November 4, 1981 (Reliability No. 1.)

100. Jones L. G.  Trip Report on U.S. Steel Gary No. 1, Coke Battery.
     September 1, 1976.  RACT 502201 (start).  (Reliability No. 1.)
                                        86

-------
101. EPA Region V file (U.S. Steel/Gary response to EPA interrogatory—1979).

102. EPA Region V files (U.S. Steel/Gary Litigation Report—12/77).

103. Telephone conversation.  Roland Elvambuena, City of Gary Air Pollution
     Control Division, Gary Health Department to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology
     Division.  March 5,  1981.  (Reliability No. 2.)

104. National Enforcement Investigation Center.  Report on Plant Inspection at
     U.S. Steel Corp./Geneva Works.  1977.  (Reliability No. 2.)

105. Telephone conversation.  Mr. Kopta, Utah State Air Pollution Control to
     Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  February 27, 1981.  (Reliability
     No. 2.)

106. Telephone conversation.  Dave Kopta, Utah State Mr Pollution Control to
     Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division.  November 1981.  (Reliability
     No. 2.)

107. Telephone conversation and letter response.  Richard Thomas, Pennsylvania
     Department of Environmental Resources to Sandy Beaton, GCA/Technology
     Division.  December 1981.  (Reliability No. 1.)

108. Telephone conversation.  Tony Johnson, Pennsylvania Department of
     Environmental Resources to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.
     February 26, 1981.  (Reliability No. 2.)

109. Telephone conversation and letter response.  John Raggi, West Virginia
     Air Pollution Control to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division.
     November 1981.  (Reliability No. 1.)

110. Coke-Oven Charging Car Effectively Controls Emissions.  Iron & Steel
     Engineer.  57(6):67.  June 1980.  (Reliability No. 4.)

111. Letter response.  James W. Dills, Department for Natural Resources and
     Environmental Protection to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division.
     February 26, 1981.  (Reliability No. 2.)

112. Emission test report.  Submitted to Allied Chemical Company, Semet-Solvay
     Division, Ashland, KY, The Minister Stein System.  York Research Corp.
     Report No. 1-9868-04.  June 7, 1979.  (Reliability No. 1.)

113. Letter response.  James Dills, Department for Natural Resources and
     Environmental Protection to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division.
     November 19, 1981.  (Reliability No. 1.)

114. Letter response.  Richard Knapp, Division of Air Pollution Control, City
     of St. Louis, MO to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division.
     November 2, 1981.  (Reliability No. 1.)

115. Telephone conversation.  Tom Scheppers, State of Missouri APC to Gene
     Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  February 24, 1981.  (Reliability
     No. 2.)


                                       87

-------
116. Telephone conversation.  Harvey Rice, Chattanooga Mr Pollution Control
     Bureau to Michael JasinsdL, GCA/Technology Division.  October 26, 1981.
     (Reliability No. 2.)

117. Telephone conversation.  Harvey Rice, Chattanooga APC Bureau to Michael
     Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division.  February 18, 1981.  (Reliability
     No. 2.)

118. EPA Region V files.  (Data supplied by Citizens Gas & Coke to EPA in
     1977.)

119. The Fabric Filter Newsletter, Mcllvaine Inc. publication, June 10, 1980,
     No. 56, pg. 5.  (Reliability No. 4.)

120. Telephone conversation.  Dave Jordan, Indianapolis APC Board to Gene
     Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  March 3, 1981.  (Reliability No. 2.)

121. Telephone conversation.  Dave Jordan, Indianapolis Air Pollution Control
     Board to Sandy Beaton, GCA/Technology Division.  November 1981.
     (Reliability No. 2.)

122. EPA Region V files.  (Detroit Coke.)

123. EPA Region V files.  (Houser & Carafas Eng. Co. report to Allied
     Chem.—2/11/77.)

124. EPA Region V files.  (5/28/80 EPA Inspection of Detroit Coke.)

125. EPA Region V files.  (3/6/81 Inspection Report of Detroit Coke.)

126. EPA Region V files.  (Consent Decree dated 2/5/79—Exhibit No. 2.)

127. Telephone conversation.  Dennis Bush, NE District Ohio EPA to Gene
     Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  February 27, 1981.  (Reliability
     No. 2.)

128. EPA Region V files.  (Coke Plant work practice rules.)

129. Telephone conversation.  Ken Kearney, Indiana State APC to Gene Bergson,
     GCA/Technology Division.  March 4, 1981.  (Reliability No. 2.)

130. Telephone conversation.  George Karp, City of Terre Haute Air Pollution
     Control to Sandy Beaton, GCA/Technology Division.  October 1981.
     (Reliability No. 2.)

131. EPA Region V files.  (Progress Report, May 1981, from Plant to EPA.)

132. Telephone conversation.  Frank Phillips, Portsmouth City Department of
     Health to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  February 27, 1981.
     (Reliability No. 2.)

133. RACT Box No. 503715-503716.  (Reliability No. 1.)
                                       88

-------
134. Telephone conversation.  Larry Wonders, Pennsylvania Department of
     Environmental Resources to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.
     February 17, 1981.  (Reliability No. 2.)

135. RACT No. 503715-503716.  (Reliability No. 2.)

136. Telephone conversation.  Bill Charleton, Pennsylvania Department of
     Environmental Resources to Sandy Beaton, GCA/Technology Division.
     November 9, 1981.  (Reliability No. 2.)

137. Revion V files.  (Permit Applications—no date.)

138. Region V files.  (Acurex Stack Test Observation of Push System on
     July 1980.)

139. Telephone conversation.  Tom Doktor, Toledo Air Pollution Control to Gene
     Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  February 27, 1981.  (Reliability
     No. 2.)

140. Telephone conversation.  Tom Doktor, Toledo Air Pollution Control to
     Sandy Beaton, GCA/Technology Division.  November 1981.  (Reliability
     No. 2.)

141. Jasinski, M. R.  Field Inspection Report of Major Air Point Source
     Facilities in Region IV, EPA Contract No. 68-01-4143, RE;  Koppers Co.,
     Inc., Woodward, Alabama Coke Plant, Inspected by GCA on July 8 and 9,
     1980.  (Reliability No. 1.)

142. Telephone conversation.  Jerry Bevington, Milwaukee County Air Pollution
     Control to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  March 9, 1981.
     (Reliability No. 2.)

143. Telephone conversation.  Jerry Bevington, Milwaukee County Air Pollution
     Control to Sandy Beaton, GCA/Technology Division.  November 1981.
     (Reliability No. 2.)

144. EPA Region V files.  (Milwaukee Solvay.)

145. Telephone conversation and letter response.  Norman Glazer, City of
     Philadelphia Air Management Services to Sandy Beaton, GCA/Technology
     Division.  November 1981.  (Reliability No. 2.)

146. Telephone conversation.  Robert King, Philadelphia Air Management to Gene
     Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  February 13, 1981.  (Reliability
     No. 2.)
                                      89

-------
     MATERIAL IN THIS SECTION SUBJECT TO CONFIDENTIALITY
    REVIEW AND IS NOT RELEASABLE AS OF FEBRUARY 1, 1982.
   FOR INFORMATION, CONTACT L. KESARI, U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY, DIVISION OF STATIONARY SOURCE ENFORCEMENT.
                                                                                     n
                                                                                     o
                                                                                   60 O
                                                                                   > W
                                                                                   n
                                                                                   o
                                                                                     Q

-------
               TABLE 1.   ARMCO INC./HAMILTON PLANT IN HAMILTON, OH

               COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in. ):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:

  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. I1     No. 21     No. 31     No. 4*

Koppers-Becker (all four batteries)2
1927a»3    19381      19411      194 71
           1976b»2    1977*>>2    1978^,2
12-51
151
12-51
251
12-51
251
12-51
1,930 (all four batteries combined)4
1,811 (all four batteries combined)4

Granite City, one-spot car serves all four
batteries5>6

Scrubber5

Ducon5
19796,7
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

^Battery rebuilt in 1961.*

^Involved end-flue rehabilitation.2
                                       90

-------
                TABLE  2.   ARMCO  INC./HOUSTON WORKS  IN HOUSTON,  TX

               COKE  OVEN  PUSHING PROCESS  AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:3
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. I1

Koppers-Becker2
19432
19762
13-131
No. 21

Koppers-Becker2
19531
19772

151
13-131
1,045 (both batteries combined)4
  840 (both batteries combined)4

Shed serves each battery!,5

Common wet ESPs (east and west) serve both
batteries8'9

Mikropul5>9
19765>7
• Two wet ESPs, each containing two fields
  and two I.D. fans operate in parallel.7'9
• Each fan rated at 100,000 acfm using 300-
  hp motor.'
• Test Data (1979);1:L»12
  182,537-197,053 acfm (outlet-range)
  93-105°F (range)
• Test Data (1977);10
  204,529-214,331 acfm (outlet-range)
  100-102°F (range)
• Test Data (1976);9
  Inlet—234,477-237,618 acfm (range)
         105-115°F (range)
  Outlet—203,925-206,338 acfm (range)
          73-78°F (range)
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2
                                    91

-------
             TABLE  3.   ARMCO  INC./MIDDLETOWN  WORKS  IN MIDDLETOWN,  OH
                                COKE PLANT NO. 2

               COKE OVEN PUSHING  PROCESS  AND  EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:3

TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:*
No. I1

Wilputte1
19532,13
761
13-61
5,150 (Coke plants No. 2 and 3 combined)4
4,890 (Coke plants No. 2 and 3 combined)4
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aLand-based system with baghoise required by Consent Decree in 1982.
                                      92

-------
             TABLE 4.   ABMCO  INC./MIDDLETOWN WORKS  IN MIDDLETOWN,  OH
                                COKE PLANT NO. 3

               COKE OVEN  PUSHING  PROCESS  AND EMISSION CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:

  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:

  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No.
                       No. 21'15

                       Dravo-Stilll.l5
                       19771.15
                       571.15
                       19-81
Dravo-Sti.il1>!5
19 761
571.15
19-81
See previous
Dravo-Osterf ield, one-spot cars serve both
batteries3. 7»16

Venturi scrubbers' »1"

Ducon (Model DVO)7»16
1976 (battery No. 1) and 1977 (battery
 No. 2)7» I6
• Each car contains two venturi scrubbers,
                       -j                 r
  and two exhaust fans.'
• Each scrubber designed for 34,426 acfm at
                                   • Ap (design) = 25 in H207»l6
                                   • 200-hp fan motors7
                                   • Scrubber water supplied at 170 gpm and
                                     15 psig7
                                   • L/G (each scrubber-calculated) = 4.9!^
                                   • Coke guide also ducted to main car by
                                     30-hp fan, and 5,900 scfm at 70°F7
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aOne car serves as a spare.7.!''
                                      93

-------
        TABLE 5.  BETHLEHEM STEEL CORP./BETHLEHEM PLANT IN BETHLEHEM, PA

               COKE  OVEN  PUSHING  PROCESS  AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (m):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:

  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
2A2
2B2
3A2
3B2
Koppers-Becker (all four batteries)2
19412      19412      19422      19422
32
   102b»1>18
              102C,1.,18
5,840 (all six batteries combined)4
5,058 (all six batteries combined)4

Chemico H-II, one-spot car serves all four
batteries7*16

Scrubber1^

Aronetics, Inc.'
198018,20
                                   (continued)
                                      94

-------
                               TABLE  5  (continued)

               COKE  OVEN  PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (m):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTQ
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:

  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
52,15

Koppers-Becker2
1953a»2
802,15
42,15 '
See previous
Chemico H-II,
one-spot car serves
battery No. 519»21

Scrubber!9>21

Aronetics, Inc.7»21
197918,20
• Design gas flow =
  88,000 scfm (push),
  60,000 scfm (during
  travel)2!
• Design water flow =
  400 gpm (push); 190
  gpm (travel)15
• L/G (by wt.; avg.)
  0.8 (push); 0.4
  (travel)15
• 20% of H-II blowdown
  is recycled to
  quench tower21
• Test Data
  (1979)J-5T22
  Flow (range) =
   72,642-75,861 dscfm
  Avg. water flow =
   397 gpm (push);
   193 gpm (travel)
McKee-Otto2
19762,7
802
62,7
Bench mounted hood-
fixed duct serves
battery A7

Venturi scrubbers7

AAF7
19765,23
• System contains two
  venturi scrubbers
  operated in
  parallel7
• Inlet gas flow =
  77,000 acfm @ 212°F
  (design for each
  scrubber)7
• Ap (design) - 30
  in. H207
• Water flow B 645
  gpm (design per
  scrubber)7
• L/G =8.5 (design
  per scrubber)7
• 2 I.D. fans, 800-
  hp each7
                                   (continued)
                                       95

-------
                              TABLE  5  (continued)

               COKE OVEN  PUSHING  PROCESS AND EMISSION  CONTROL DATA
                                    Scrubber water
                                     chemistry:  TSS
                                     = 9.5 ppm (avg.)j
                                     TDS = 121.1 ppm
                                     avg.)
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery 5 rebuilt in 1977.5

bBattery 2A and 2B combined.ij18

cBattery 3A and 3B combined.1>18
                                        96

-------
      TABLE 6.  BETHLEHEM STEEL CORP./BURNS HARBOR PLANT IN CHESTERTON,  IN

               COKE OVEN  PUSHING  PROCESS AND EMISSION  CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:c
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. I1*5
No. 21*5
Wilputte1
196924
1980a»25
1982b,25
82L26
20-524
Koppersl
197224
821,26
20-524
6,670 (both batteries combined)4
5,179 (both batteries combined)4

Bench mounted hood-fixed duct serves each
battery7»13

Common scrubbers serve both batteries
(Type F, venturi)24,27

AAF27
1978;24 197923,25
• Two high energy fixed-throat venturi
  scrubbers are interconnected by common
  duct (one serves as backup)2-*,2' ,28
• Each scrubber has a special plug type
  design27
• Design Ap = 50 in. W.G. (each
  scrubber)27
• I.D. fan rated at 141,000 cfm27
• Fan motors are 2,000-hp27
• Test Data (1980);24
  Ap (range) = 50-55 in. W.G. (both
   scrubbers)
  Scrubber inlet temp. = 250-450°F
• Test Data (1979);2^
  No. 1 battery—Ayg. 133,400 dscfm at
   146°F avg.
  1,310 gpm of scrubber water used
  Ap = 52 in. W.C. (avg.)
                                   (continued)
                                        97

-------
                               TABLE  6  (continued)

               COKE  OVEN  PUSHING  PROCESS  AND  EMISSION  CONTROL DATA
                                       No. 2 battery—Avg. 137,000 dscfm at
                                        139°F avg.
                                       1,191 gpm of scrubber water used
                                       Ap = 51 in. W.C. (avg.)
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

alnvolved changing steam nozzles, i.e., increasing aspiration, and rebuilding
 battery top."

^Scheduled shutdown for rebuild, i.e., double collector mains to be
 installed.25

cBench mounted hood-fixed duct system replaced a coke side shed in 1978.^
                                       98

-------
        TABLE 7.  BETHLEHEM STEEL CORP./JOHNSTOWN PLANT IN JOHNSTOWN,  PA

              COKE  OVEN  PUSHING  PROCESS AND EMISSION  CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:a>b

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (m) :

COKE PRODUCTION:0

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:

  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. 1829

Koppers2»30
195129,30

198230,31
77l»30
3.5;7 42
3,500 (for three battery operation)4
3,028 (for three battery operation)4

Koppers/Rosedale, one-spot car serves
battery No. 185»7

Scrubberd»29
    :y (A33)7
Rile
1978
• 350-hp fan motor; fan rated @ 40,000
  acfm  »
• Ap (scrubber) = 30 in. H?029,32
• Water flow = 400-425 gpm*9»32
• Scrubber water quality—TSS = 1,107 mg/1
  (avg.);  TDS = 245 mg/1 (avg.)29
• Test Data (1979);32
  Flow = 27,000 dscfm (avg.)
  Outlet temp. = 153°F (avg.)
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery No. 18 located in the Franklin Plant.  Battery Nos. 17 and 19
 (total—151 ovens), also in the Franklin Plant, were  shut down in 1977.

^Johnstown facility also contained Battery Nos. 15 and 16 (total—88 ovens),
 designated as the Rosedale Plant, shut down in 1977 due to flood.30

Production data shown for the Franklin Plant prior to shutdown of
 Battery Nos. 17 and 19.4

^Scrubber water tank is normally drained, flushed and filled twice per turn;
 blowdown of 150 gallons is drained after each push.32
                                     99

-------
       TABLE 8.  BETHLEHEM STEEL CORP./LACKAWANNA PLANT IN LACKAWANNA, NY

               COKE  OVEN  PUSHING  PROCESS  AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in. ):
No. 75
Wilputte2
I9522
762,34
12-23.4 ,
No. 85
Wilputte2
I961b,2
762,34
12-234
No. 95
Wilputte2
19692
1982°, 33
762>3*
20-434
COKE PRODUCTION:d

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:

  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
8,140 (for seven battery operation)^
6,908 (for seven battery operation)^

Chemico H-II, one-spot car       e
serves batteries No. 7 and 8^°

Scrubber^

Aronetics, Inc.'
1979;7 198Q33
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBatteries No. 3,4,5 and 6 were shut down in 1977.33,34

bBattery was completly rebuilt in 1980.33

cScheduled shutdown for rebuild.33

^Production data reflects operation of battery Nos. 3,4,5,6,7,8, and 9.^

eA Chemico H-II car was scheduled to be installed in Dec. 1980 on Battery
 No. 9 by Consent Decree.  Scrubber manufactured by Aronetics Inc.?
                                  100

-------
   TABLE 9.  BETHLEHEM STEEL CORP./SPARROWS POINT PLANT IN SPARROWS POINT, MD

               COKE  OVEN  PUSHING  PROCESS  AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:d

TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
No. I2     No. 22     No. 32
No. 42
Koppers2   Koppers2   Koppers2   Koppers2
I9602      19612      19512      19782

1985b>35   1985b>35   1982C»31   1985b>35
632        602        632        632
32   '      32         32         32
5,500 (all eight batteries combined)36
                                   (continued)
                                      101

-------
                               TABLE  9  (continued)

               COKE  OVEN  PUSHING  PROCESS  AND  EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:*"
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m):
No. 52
Koppers2
19782
I985b>35
632 ,
32
No. 62
Koppers2
19532
1982C>31
632
32
No. II2
Koppers-
Becker2
19552
652
42
No. 122
Koppers-
Becker2
19572
652
42
COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:d
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:

  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
See previous page3"
           Chemico H-II, one-
           spot car serves
           batteries No. 11 and
           127,19

           Scrubber19

           Aronetics, Inc.?
           19797»35
           • High pressure hot
             water ejector
             evacuates gases
             during push37
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery Nos. 9 and 10 were shut down in early 1981.3*>

t>New Battery "A" to start up in Dec. 1981; new Battery "B" scheduled to
 start up in Dec. 1985 will replace Battery Nos. 1,2,4, and 5.36

cPlant has the option to either shut down battery Nos. 3 and 6 in 1982, or
 continue their operation until 1985.3^

^Battery Nos. 1 through 6 will have push controls by the end of 1981; new
 Battery "A" will have land-based push control system upon installation.'
                                      102

-------
              TABLE 10.  CF&I STEEL CORP./PUEBLO PLANT IN PUEBLO, CO

                COKE  OVEN  PUSHING  PROCESS AND  EMISSION CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:

  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:

  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
fll.5       cl,5

Koppers    Koppers2

19725,38
13-039 '    13-039
    5      47L5
Granite City (south),
one-spot car serves
Batteries B and C5>40

     Scrubber40

     Ducon40
     19797
• Test Data (I960);41
  49,420-52,000 acfm
  (range); 115°F
                        Dl.5

                        Koppers-
                         Becker2
                        I9602
                        13-039
                        Granite City (north),
                        one-spot car serves
                        Battery 0^,40

                        Scrubber40

                        Ducon40
                        19797
                        • Test Data (I960);41
                          47,930-51,410 acfm
                          (range); 145-161°F
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation, and conversion from single to double
 collector mains.2
                                       103

-------
          TABLE llj  FORD MOTOR CO./RIVER ROUGE  PLANT  IN  DEARBORN, MI

              COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:8
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in. ):
AL42
Koppers-
Becker2
1937b>l
451, 42
13-3M2
AxL42
Wilputtel
197242
1979d>2
13L42
13-3L42
Bl,42
Koppers-
Becker2
1937C»1
1979d»2
61L42
13-31
COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:6
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
4,340 (all five batteries combined)4
3,945 (all five batteries combined)4

Bench mounted hood-fixed duct serves
batteries A, Ax and B42>43

Common high-energy scrubber system serves
all three batteries4^44

AAF44
1972f,5,43
• One I.D. fan rated at 112,000 acfm @
  132°F (avg.)44
• Ap (design) = 60 in. H2044
• Design scrubber water flow = 890 gpm4"
• L/G = 7.95 (calculated-design)44.46
• Fan rated at 2,000-hp44
                                   (continued)
                                      104

-------
                              TABLE 11 (continued)

               COKE  OVEN  PUSHING  PROCESS  AND  EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft~in.):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
                               .h
Koppers-Becker2
19398 ,1
Koppers-Becker2
19631
13-31
13-31
     See previous page4
Bench mounted hood-fixed duct serves
batteries C and Dx42>43

Common high-energy scrubber system serves
both batteries43 >44
197643
• System similar to that used for
batteries "A", "Ax" and "B" (see previous
page)43,44,46
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery D pushed empty in 1972.42

^Battery rebuilt in 1964; 16 ovens have been hot and empty since 1964.1>42

cBattery rebuilt in 1962.1

^Involved end-flue rehabilitation.2

eSystem was modified in 1981 from conventional one-spot to rotary one-spot
 car.57,45

^Original hood-duct installation in 1972—Battery A; extended to batteries
 Ax and B in 1974 and 1976, respectively.43

SBattery rebuilt in 1963.1

^System will be modified by 1982 to be compatible with rotary one-spot
                                      105

-------
       TABLE 12.  INLAND STEEL CO./INDIANA HARBOR WORKS IN E. CHICAGO, IN
                                COKE PLANT NO. 2

              COKE OVEN PUSHING  PROCESS  AND  EMISSION  CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:

  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. 61
No. 71
No. 81
Koppers-Becker (all three batteries)!
19501          19561          19581
1971a,2        19743,2
651
12-O1
871
12-01
871
12-Ql
6,170 (all five batteries combined)4
5,640 (all five batteries combined)4

Granite City, one-spot cars serve
batteries No. 6-10b>47

Scrubber per car47
1979 (first car);47 1980 (two cars)47
• Design specifications (each scrubber);4**
  Ap = 48 in. H20
  Fan rpms = 1,500
  100 gal of scrubber water per push
                                   (continued)
                                      106

-------
                              TABLE 12 (continued)

               COKE  OVEN  PUSHING PROCESS  AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:

  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. 91

Koppers-Becker^
19591
87,1 .
12-O1
See previous page^
See previous
No.
Koppers-Beckerl
19701
511
20-01
See previous
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2

^Three cars are available to serve all five batteries (No. 6-10).
                                      107

-------
       TABLE 13.  INLAND STEEL CO./INDIANA HARBOR WORKS IN E. CHICAGO, IN
                           COKE PLANTS NO. 3a AND 4b

                 COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in. ):
ci
Koppersl
19741
1979c,50
561
20-21
111
Koppersl
1978M9
691.^9
20-21
COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
2,500 (battery C)4   3,014 (battery No. II)4
1,562 (battery C)4   2,740 (battery No. II)4
Shed serves
battery C5»7
Koppers, one-spot car
serves battery No.
Scrubber (Type S—   Scrubber (Kinpactor)7
Klnpactor venturi)->2
AAF52
197423,50
• System uses 1,500
  hp fan rated at
  200,000 acfm at
  150°Fd»7
• Design scrubber
  water rate =
  2,400 gpm7
• L/G (design-
  calculated) 12:17
• Test Data
  (1975);37
  211,750 dscfm
   (avg.)
  Temp. •= 77.5°F
   (avg.)
• Shed measures
   360-ft long7
AAF7
197850,53
• Design flow rate =
  17,000 acfm48
• Test Data (1978);54
  15,179 acfm (avg.)
  Temp. - 113°F (avg.)
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery No. C.

bBattery No. II.4
c                                 51
 Involved end-flue rehabilitation.
 Spare fan equal in size and capacity is available.
                                       108

-------
             TABLE 14.   INTERLAKE INC./RIVERDALE PLANT IN CHICAGO,  IL

              COKE OVEN  PUSHING  PROCESS AND  EMISSION  CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-In. ):
No. I1
Wilputte1
1956; 19575
19793*2
502,55
12-81
No. 21
Wilputte1
19571
1979a2
502,55
12-81
COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:

  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYST1M:


TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
1,850;! 1.7404 (both batteries
 combined)
1,460 (both batteries combined)4

Minister Stein system serves each
battery5'56

Common venturi scrubber serves both
batteries5>56

Riley5»5657
197956,57
• Design flow rate = 100,000 scfm with
  90% capture efficiency56
• Test Data (I960);56
  104,677 dscfm (avg.) or
  112,095 acfm (avg.) at 90°F (avg.)
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2

^Batteries previously controllad by Halcon car installed in 1973.
                                       109

-------
    TABLE 15.   JONES & LAUGHLIN STEEL CORP./ALIQUIPPA WORKS IN ALIQUIPPA,  PA

              COKE  OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION  CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):

COKE PRODUCTION:0

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
Koppers-Becker2
19451
197858

1061
13-01 '
                                                     Koppers1
                                                     19762>55
                                                     20-61
                                   4,308 (both batteries combined)58
                                   3,500 (both batteries combined)61
                  Shed serves battery A-55>59

                  Scrubber (Kinpactor
                  venturi)5>59

                  AAF5.59
                  197623,58
                  • Shed dimensions;6^
                    360 ft long, 54 ft wide,
                    73 ft to peak; extends
                    50 ft beyond ends of
                    battery
                  • Two I.D. fans rated at
                    200,000 cfm @ ambient
                    temp.59
                  • One fan normally
                    operated at 320,000
                    acfm; other fan as
                    standby61
                  • Fans driven by 2,500 hp
                    motors'»61
                  • Ap (scrubber) = 30 in.
                    H20 (design)59*61
                  • Water flow = 2,500 gpm
                    (design)61
                  • L/G = 7.8 (calculated)61
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBatteries A-3 and A-4 were shut down in 1980.
           58
bBattery A-5 replaced Battery A-2 in 1975-1976.61

Production data for a four-battery operation (A-l, A-3, A-4, and A-5) =
 6,946 (rated tons/day) and 4,506 (typical tons/day).^
                                       110

-------
    TABLE 16.  JONES AND LAUGHLIN STEEL CORP./CAMPBELL WORKS IN CAMPBELL, OH

              COKE  OVEN  PUSHING  PROCESS AND  EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
No. 71
Wilputte1
1954^5

761
13-01
No. 91
Wilputte1
195855

761
13-01
COKE PRODUCTION^

  RATED TONS/DAY:

  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:

  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
4.000;1 3,8164 (for three battery
 operation)
3,483 (for three battery operation)^
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery No. 8 shut down June 5, I960.62

''Production data reflects operation of battery Nos. 7, 8, and 9.
                                      111

-------
 TABLE 17.  JONES & LAUGHLIN STEEL CORP./INDIANA HARBOR WORKS IN E. CHICAGO, IN

               COKE  OVEN  PUSHING  PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:8

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):

COKE PRODUCTION:0

  RATED TONS/DAY:

  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:

  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
                                   No. 41

                                   Koppers-Becker2
                                   19562»63
                                   1976b»64
                       No. 91

                       Koppers-Becker2
                       19611,63
                       1979b,2
                                   13 -O1
                       13-01
                                   4.050;1 4,0004 (for three battery
                                    operation)
                                   3,406 (for three battery operation)
Chemico H-III,
one-spot car serves
battery No. 45>19

Scrubber19

Aronetics, Inc.''
19797,23
Chemico H-III,
one-spot car serves
battery No. 919

Scrubber19

Aronetics, Inc.7
1980764
• Test Data
  (1981) ;Q5"
  47,710-60,916 dscfm
  (range)
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery No. 3 permanently shut down.64

blnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2>6^

cProduction data reflects operation of battery Nos. 3, 4, and
                                      112

-------
   TABLE 18.  JONES & LAUGHLIN STEEL CORP./PITTSBURGH WORKS IN PITTSBURGH, PA

               COKE  OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION  CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
Pll
Wilputte1
19601
197966
59l
13-01
P21
Wilputte1
19611
1977a»2
591
13-01
P3N1
Wilputte1
19611
19 8oa, 66
591
13 -O1
COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:

  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
5,300 (all five batteries combined)4
5,230 (all five batteries combined)4

Minister Stein system
serves batteries PI and P267
               198167
                                   (continued)
                                      113

-------
                              TABLE 18 (continued)

               COKE  OVEN PUSHING  PROCESS  AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:               P3S1                   P41

  MANUFACTURER:                    Wilputte1              Koppers-Becker2
  STARTUP DATE:                    19611                  19531
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:      1978a»2                1977a>2
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:                    591                    791
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):            13-0*                  13-01

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:                      See previous page*
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:b»c

TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:

  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2

bBatteries P3N and P3S scheduled for a Minister Stein system by
 Jan. 1982.23»66

CA Minister Stein-baghouse control system on battery P4 will begin operation
 in Dec. 1981; replaces a Chemico H-II car (installed 1978).  The Chemico car
 may be sent to either the Campbell Works or Indiana Harbor Works to be used as
 a spare.5,l"»2.3,o7

-------
           TABLE 19.  KAISER STEEL CORP./FONTANA WORKS IN FONTANA, CA

               COKE  OVEN  PUSHING  PROCESS  AND  EMISSION  CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:;1
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:

  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:

  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
Koppers-Becker^
194268
19732

451,68
13-068
Koppers-Becker^
1942^8
197368

451,68
13-068
4,250;! 4,1004 (all seven batteries
 combined)
3,800 (all seven batteries combined)^
                                   (continued)
                                      115

-------
                              TABLE 19 (continued)

               COKE  OVEN  PUSH NG  PROCESS  AND  EMISSION  CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:

  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
Koppers-Becker^
194968
!976a,68

451,68
13-068'
Koppers-Becker^
1952^8
1979-80^,68

451,68
13-068
    See previous page
                     1,4
                                   (continued)
                                      116

-------
                              TABLE 19 (continued)

               COKE OVEN  PUSHING  PROCESS AND EMISSION  CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in. ):
El
Koppers-
Becker2
195268
1978b»2
451,68'
13-068
Fl
Koppers-
Becker2
195868

13-068
Gl
Koppers-
Becker2
195868

451,68
13-068
COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:0

TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:

  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
See previous pagesl»^
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aInvolved trimwork.68

blnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2*68

CA purchase order was submitted in March 1979 for the installation of a
 "Minister Stein" system to control Batteries "F and G."  Construction started,
 but was terminated at an early stage.69
                                       117

-------
                   TABLE  20.   LONE  STAR STEEL  IN LONE  STAR,  TX

               COKE OVEN  PUSHCNG  PROCESS AND EMISSION  CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-In.):

COKE PRODUCTION:15

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:

  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:0
C2

Koppers^
19795
702,70
57,70
1.2144
  690*

Koppers/Lone Star, one-spot carj

Scrubber^

Hydrosonics®/Lone Star5»70
19797,70
• Designed to control -45,000 scfm
  (52,500 acfm @ 272°F)7,/0
• 360 gal scrubber water required per
  push'0
• L/G = 6.85 (calculated—based on
  52,500 acfm)7,70
• Test Data (1979);70
  Avg. inlet flow = 66,000 scf per push
• Test Data (1979):72
  43,900-44,100 scfm
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBatteries A & B (total—78 ovens) were shut down in 1979.71

^Production data appears to bo for the old batteries.4

cDirty water cleaned every th .rd push and sent to quench tower sump.7°
                                      118

-------
    TABLE 21.  NATIONAL STEEL CORP./GREAT LAKES STEEL DIVISION IN ECORSE,  MI
                                COKE PLANT NO. 2

              COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS  AND EMISSION  CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):

COKE PRODUCTION:b

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. 3l

Wilputte1'73
19542,73

1982b»51
?oi
13-21
No. 41

Wilputte1.73
19562,73
1974a,74

781
13-21
2,500 (both batteries combined)4
2,500 (both batteries combined)4

Modified Mitsubishi bench mounted hood-
fixed duct serves batteries No. 3 and 4.7,73

Common scrubber system serves both
batteries73

ARCO7
1973 (upgraded—1974)c>73
• System consists of three scrubbers and
  three fans operated in parallel3
• Each I.D. fan has 500 hp motor; each
  rated at 75,000 acfm @ 150°F7»73
• Test Data (Battery No. 3—1973);7
  Flow rate =  135,000 scfm (wet)
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.74

^Scheduled shutdown for rebuild, with startup in 1985.^1

cTwo scrubber fans installed 1973, additional scrubber fan installed 1974.73
                                     119

-------
    TABLE 22.  NATIONAL STEEL CORP./GREAT LAKES STEEL DIVISION IN ECORSE, MI
                                COKE PLANT NO. 3

               COKE  OVEN PUSHING  PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
No. 51

Otto1>73
19701.2
85*
20-51
3.412;73 2,900* (battery No. 5)
2,700 (battery No. 5)4

Modified Mitsubishi bench mounted hood-
fixed duct serves battery No. 573

Scrubber73
  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
197873
• System uses one scrubber and one
  fan with an additional scrubber on
  standby73
• Scrubbers are fixed throat Venturis
  rated at 306.000 acfm at 80°F
  (saturated)73
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
                                    120

-------
TABLE 23.  NATIONAL STEEL CORP./GRANITE CITY STEEL DIVISION IN GRAINTE CITY, IL

               COKE  OVEN  PUSHING  PROCESS  AND EMISSION CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATIONS

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  OVEN HEIGHT  (ft-in.):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:

  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
Ab,75

McKee-Otto75
198075
4575
14-075
760-85375

Granite City, one-spot car serves
battery A76

High-energy venturi scrubber7**

Ducon23»76
1977C«7
• Design flow rate = 50,000 acfm at
  165°F (saturated)7
• Ap  (design) = 40 in. H2077
• Test Data  (1980—No. 2 car);76
  67,020-72,510 acfm (range)
  101-113°F  (range)
  Ap  = 33-37 in. H20
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aPlant formerly operated batt iries B and  C which contained  49  and 61 ovens,
 respectively.  These batteriis are currently being rebuilt similar to battery
 "A" and will contain 45 and  +7 ovens, respectively.7-'

^This battery replaced a simi Lar type Koppers-Becker battery containing  27
 ovens.
       75
cGranite City car was previou sly used on batteries B and  C  for  pushing
 control.  Battery A was uncontrolled prior to 1980.7>7^
                                      121

-------
     TABLE  24.  NATIONAL  STIEL  CORP./WEIRTON STEEL DIVISION IN WEIRTON,  WV

               COKE  OVEN PUSI'ING PROCESS  AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in. ):
M-7l
Koppers-Becker^
19511
198279
13-21
M-81
Koppers-Becker^
195378
1979b,79
13-21
COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
  MANUFACTURER:

  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
4,600 (for four battery operation)0>^
4,066 (for four battery operation)0^

                  Two-Step Quench  (TSQ)78»80

                  "Modified" PECT/Donner
                  Hanna hood with two
                  ejector scrubbers7**,80

                  PECT/Donner Hanna and
                   National Steel78
                  198078,80
                  • Original PECT/Donner
                    Hanna Fog Spray
                    System (1979) was
                    modified in 1980
                    to include two cold
                    water ejector
                    scrubbers8^
                  • Each scrubber is
                    designed for 4,600
                    scfm80
                                   (continued)
                                 122

-------
                               TABLE 24 (continued)

               COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:8

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTiM:*
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
I-ll

Koppersl
19731*5
1979d«2

871.5
20-478
3,600 (battery I-l)4
3,000 (battery 1-
Koppers/Weirton, one-spot car serves
battery I-15>7

High energy, variable throat venturi
scrubber'

AAF7
19737,78
• Gases pass through scrubber, flooded
  elbow, cyclonic separator fan, and stack'
• Design flow rate = 37,500 acfm @
  170°F (scrubber outlet)7'81
• Design flow rate = 36,110 acfm @
  700°F (inlet)81
• Water flow = 300 ggm (design)7 >81
• L/G = 8 (design)7»81
• Ap = 50 in. W.C. (design)7
• Ap = 35 in. W.C. (max. during push)7
• Ap < 10 in. W.C. (travel)7
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBatteries M-5 and M-6 (total of 106 ovens) were shut down in Sept.-Oct. 1980  '

 Involved end-wall rehabilitation

cProduction data for the "mainland" reflects a four battery operation
 (M-5, M-6, M-7, and M-8) ' y
j                                *y
 Involved end-flue rehabilitation

eSystem is no longer in operation due to quencher problems and scrubber
 deterioration-separator explosion.7»78
                                      123

-------
     TABLE 25.  REPUBLIC STEEL CORP./SOUTHERN STEEL DISTRICT, THOMAS WORKS
                IN BIRMINGHAM, AL

               COKE  OVEN PUSHING  PROCESS  AND EMISSION  CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:                             No. I1

  MANUFACTURER:                                  Koppers1
  STARTUP DATE:                                  19413*1
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:                    1981b>82
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:                                  651
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):                          13-01

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:                                1,066;4 9501
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:                              5604

PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:0

TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:

  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery was rebuilt In 1969.2

^Involved end-flue rehabilitiation.82

cPlant employs "bubble concept" for emissions control.5,82
                                      124

-------
         TABLE  26.   REPUBLIC  STEEL  CORP./CHICAGO  DISTRICT IN CHICAGO,  IL

               COKE  OVEN  PUSHING  PROCESS  AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:b

TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:b

  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. I1

Wilputte83
1943^,7

1981a>7>83
751.5
13 -Ql
1.369:4 1,20083
1,3004

Shed serves battery No. I5,83

Wet ESP5>I5

Mikropul5
197723
• System consists of two ESPs operated
  in parallel, then two I.D. fans and
  one stack'»°4
• Design flow rate = 210,000 acfm (total
  system)5'84
• Each fan uses 535 hp motor'
• Two fields per ESP; 28 gas passages^jl5
• Collection area = 25,200 sq ft (total)i5
• A secondary hood covering the quench
  car tracks between the battery and
  quench tower is exhausted by an
  auxiliary fan (35 hp) into the main
  shed flow system'
• Test Data (1977);84
  Inlet—193,866 acfm @ 75°F
  Outlet—182,294 acfm @ 39°F
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery No. 1 will be replaced (late 1981) by Battery No. 2 containing 60,
 6 m ovens, double collector mains, 4 charge holes, automatic lid lifters,
 using stage charging and rated at 1,800 tons of coke per day.83

bNew battery will use a Mitsubishi bench-mounted hood-fixed duct system,
 and the existing ESP for pushing emission control.7,83
                                        125

-------
     TABLE  27.  REPUBLIC STEEL CORP./CLEVELAND DISTRICT  IN CLEVELAND, OH
                                COKE PLANT NO. 1

              COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION  CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION: a
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:b
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in. ):
No. I1
Koppersl
19765
5ll
13-21
No. 21
Koppers^
19582
19722
5ll
13-21
No. 31
Koppersl
19582
19722
511
13 -21
No. 41
Koppersl
19582
19722
511
13-21
COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:0
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:

  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
   2,782 (all four batteries combined)^
   2,049 (all four batteries combined)^

Koppers/Rosedale, one-spot cars (two
cars—Nos. 11 and 12 serve all four
batteries)23*86

   Venturi-Rod Scrubber (on each car)8?

                Riley7
                1978/
• Each scrubber uses fan rated at 30,000
                                    • Test Data (1979—No. 11 car);86
                                      Avg. Ap = 34.8 in. ^0
                                      Avg. inlet flow rate « 39,930 acfm at
                                        528 °F
                                      Avg. outlet flow rate = 28,500 acfm at
                                        99°F
                                    • Test Data (1979-No. 12 car);
                                      Avg. outlet flow rate = 28,700 acfm at
                                        128°F
                                      Avg. Ap = 29.3 in. H20
                                      Scrubber water flow rate = 125-150 gpm
                                      L/G (calculated) = 4.4-5.2
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery No. 5 was shut down in 1975.85

^Included end-flue rehabilitation.2

CA spare Koppers-Rosedale car is available for batteries No. 1-4.88
                                        126

-------
      TABLE 28.   REPUBLIC  STEEL  CORP./CLEVELAND DISTRICT IN CLEVELAND,  OH
                                COKE PLANT NO. 2

              COKE  OVEN PUSHING PROCESS  AND  EMISSION  CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:b
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:0
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:

  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. 61

Koppers-Becker^
195255
19792
13-21
No. 71

Koppers-Beckerl
1952^5
19 79 2

631
13-21
  1,954 (both batteries combined)^
  1,286 (both batteries combined)4

Chemico H-III, one-spot cars (two
cars—Nos. 21 and 22 serve both
batteries).7»19

        Scrubber (on each car)19

           Aronetics, Inc.'
                19807,85
• Test Data (1981—-No. 21 car);89
  Flow rate (range) = 88,122-96,043
   acfm
  Temp, (range) = 119-137°F
• Test Data (1981—No. 22 car);89
  Flow rate (range) = 97,483-100,414
   acfm
  Temp, (range) = 120-149°F
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery No. 5 was shut down in 1975.85

blncluded end-flue rehabilitation.2

C0ne Chemico H-III car serves as spare for batteries No. 6 and
                                      127

-------
       TABLE 29.  REPUBLIC STEEL CORP./SOUTHERN DISTRICT, GULFSTEEL WORKS
                  IN GADSDEN, AL

               COKE  OVEN PUSHING PROCESS  AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
No. 2l»5
Wilputte90
194290
1973*, 2
651.90
42,90
Ho. 31*5
Wilputte90
196090
65L90
42,90
COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:                  2,372;4 l,40Ql (both batteries combined)
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:                1,785 (both batteries combined)4

PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:b

TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:

  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:


ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2

%o controls used—"bubble concept" employed for emissions control.5
                                      128

-------
    TABLE  30.   REPUBLIC  STEEL  CORP./CENTRAL ALLOY DISTRICT IN MASSILLON,  OH

               COKE  OVEN PUSHING PROCESS  AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA


BATTERY DESIGNATION:                             No. I1

  MANUFACTURER:                                  Koppers1
  STARTUP DATE:                                  19551
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:                       198231
  NO. OF OVENS:                           .       311
  OVEN HEIGHT  (ft-in.):                           13-21

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:                                576:4 5001
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:                               500*

PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:

  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:


ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
                                      129

-------
     TABLE 31.  REPUBLIC STEEL CORP./MAHONING VALLEY DISTRICT IN WARREN, OH

               COKE  OVEN PUSHING  PROCESS  AND  EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:a
  NO. OF OVENS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:b
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:

  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. 41

Koppers91
19792
85
13-0
1.8524
1,2794

Chemico H-III, one-spot car
serves battery No. 419

Scrubber19

Aronetics, Inc.7
19795>7
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBatteries No. 1 and 2 were shut down in March 1979.62

^A spare Chemico H-III car is available.19
                                       130

-------
   TABLE 32.  REPUBLIC STEEL CORP./MAHONING VALLEY DISTRICT IN YOUNGSTOWN, OH

              COKE OVEN  PUSHING  PROCESS  AND  EMISSION  CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in. ):
Al
Koppersl
19501.92
1982b>5
13-21
381
Bl
Koppersl
1950L92
1982b»5
13-21
651
ci
Koppersl
1950a,l
13-21
591
COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:

  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:



TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:

  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
                                   2,970;4 2,46Ql (all three batteries
                                    combined)
                                   2,735 (all three batteries combined)4

                                                  Chemico H-III, one-spot car
                                                  serves batteries B and
                                                  Scrubber?

                                                  Aronetics, Inc.'
                                                  I96062 > 92
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

^Battery rebuilt in 1962.2

^Scheduled shutdown by Federal Consent Decree.5»62
                                      131

-------
       TABLE  33.   UNITED  STATES  STEEL  CORP./CLAIRTON WORKS IN CLAIRTON,  PA

               COKE  OVEN  PUSHING PROCESS  AND  EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in. ):
No. 193
Wilputte2
195593
1979^3
6493
13-093
No. 293
Wilputte2
195593
197993
6493
13-093
No. 393
Wilputte2
195593
197993
6493
13-093
COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:

  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
    20,780 (entire coke plant)4
    16,342 (entire coke plant)4

Chemico H-III, one-spot car serves batteries
 No. 1, 2 and 366»93

Scrubber19.93

Aronetics, Inc.'
198166,93
                                   (continued)
                                      132

-------
                              TABLE 33 (continued)

               COKE OVEN  PUSHING  PROCESS AND  EMISSION  CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
No. 793
Koppers2
195494
198431
6497
42
No. 893
Koppers^
195495
198431
6497
42
No. 993
Koppers2
195496
198431
6497
42
COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:  ;
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:

  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
      See previous
Chemico H-III, one-spot car serves batteries
No. 7, 8, and 966»93

Scrubber19»93

Aronetics, Inc.7
198166>93
                                   (continued)
                                      133

-------
                              TABLE 33 (continued)

               COKE  OVEN  PUSHING  PROCESS  AND  EMISSION  CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (m):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:b
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:

  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. 1593

Koppers^
1953a>2
6193
42
See previous pages^
Chemico H-III, one-spot car
serves battery No. 15^|93

Scrubber19'93

Aronetics, Inc.'
19795>66
                                   (continued)
                                       134

-------
                              TABLE 33 (continued)

               COKE  OVEN  PUSHING  PROCESS  AND  EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (m):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:

  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. 1693
Wilputte2
195098
19 8231
6193
42
No. 1793
Wilputte2
195099
198231
6193
42
     See previous pages^


Shed serves battery No. 175»93

Scrubber (Type S Kinpactor)93*97

AAF5.97
19755»7
• 256 ft long shed extending 15 ft over
  ends of battery97
• Designed to exhaust 216,000 acfm via 2
  parallel, 800-hp fans5'9?
• Temp. = 91°F (design-outlet)9?
• Ap = 25 in. H20 (design)5
• Water flow = 2,000 gpm; Ap (scrubber) =
  23 in. H20
• L/G = 9 (design)5
                                   (continued)
                                       135

-------
                              TABLE 33 (continued)

               COKE  OVEN  PUSHING  PROCESS  AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (m):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:

  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. 19^3   No. 2093    NO. 2193   No. 22*5

Koppers-Becker (all four batteries)2
195ll°0    1947C.101   1947102    1946103
197793                 1972d,31
8793       8793
52  .       52
                       8793
                       52
           8793
           52
           See previous
Chemico H-III,
one-spot car serves
batteries No. 19
and 20f>!9,93

Scrubber19»93

Aronetics, Inc.?
19795,93
Chemico H-III,
one-spot car serves
batteries No. 21
and 2219,93

Scrubberl9,93

Aronetics, Inc.?
197966,93
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery No. 15 rebuilt in 1979.2

bSpare Chemico H-III car available for battery No. 1519

cBattery No. 20 was rebuilt in 1978.93

dlnvolved end-flue rehabilitiation.31

eRebuilt from bench up.93

f Batteries No. 19 and 20 were previously controlled by Chemico H-II, one-
 spot car which is currently used as spare for these two batteries.19,93
                                      136

-------
      TABLE  34.  UNITED  STATES  STEEL  CORP./FAIRFIELD WORKS IN FAIRFIELD,  AL

               COKE  OVEN PUSHING  PROCESS  AND  EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:a

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (m):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:


  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:

  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. 2104

U.S. Steel/Still2
1978l°4
57104
6104
No. 9104

Koppers-Becker2
195855
1974M05

63104
45
6,866 (appears to be for five battery
 operation, i.e., Nos. 2, 5, 6, 7,
 and 9)4,82
5,930 (appears to be for five battery
 operation, i.e., Nos. 2, 5, 6, 7,
 and 9)4,82
U.S. Steel one-spot
car serves battery
No. 25,104
Mitsubishi bench-
mounted hood-fixed
duct system serves
battery No. 95,7,1°4
Venturi scrubberl°4    Baghouse5»7»104
Ducon"
197882
• Exhaust flow rate
   47,000 cfml°4
• Ap (design) = 24
  in. W.G.1°6
• 350 gal of water
  used per pusb.106
• Test Data (1979);106
  44,000 dscfm @ 123°F
   (avg.)
  Ap = 23.5-26.6 in.
   H20 (range)
Wheelabrator-Frye82
197982
• Baghouse capacity
  = 100,000 scfm82
• A/C (design) =
  3:182
• Polyester bags82
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 were shut down in 1977, 1977, 1980, 1980,
 1979, and 1978, respectively.82,104

bBattery No. 9 was rebuilt in 1979.104

cBattery No. 9 has been idling hot since Aug. 1980.82
                                          137

-------
    TABLE  35.  UNITED STATES STEEL CORP./FAIRLESS WORKS  IN  FAIRLESS HILLS, PA

              COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION  CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in. ):
No. I1
Wilputte1
I9522
1978a>2
8?1
13-61
No. 21
Wilputte1
19532
1978a»2
871
13-61
COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:                  3,000 (both batteries combined)4
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:                3,000 (both batteries combined)4

PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM :b

TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:


ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2
       per battery, ducted to common baghouse (manufacturer-Mikropul)
 ordered.  Baghouse designed for 300,000 to 400,000 acfm.3
                                      138

-------
           TABLE 36.  UNITED STATES STEEL CORP./GARY WORKS IN GARY, IN

               COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
No. I5
Koppers-
Becker2
1979b»2
852,108
65,107
No. 25 No. 35
U.S. Steel/ U.S. Steel/
Still2 Still2
19752,107 19762»1°7
575 575
65,107 65,107
COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:

  MANUFACTURER:

  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
11,960 (all eight batteries combined)4
 9,750 (all eight batteries combined)4

U.S. Steel, one-spot  U.S. Steel, one-spot
louvered car serves   louvered cars serve
battery No. I7        batteries No. 2
                      and 357,107
Scrubber7 >1°7

Ducon:64 Air
1979;1°9 19807
• Variable throat
  scrubber 10 7
• Design flow rate
  = 40,100 scfm64
• Ap = 32 in.
  W.C.64
• Design L/G
  = 1Q107
Scrubber per car7,107

Ducon7»l°7

1977;7 1978-19795
• Variable throat;1°7
  fixed throat
  scrubbers7
• Design specifics (each
  scrubber );/,-LUt>
  Flow rate = 75,000
   acfm at 160°F
  Scrubber water rate =
   700 gpm
  L/G -' 9.3
  Ap « 24 in. H20
• Test Data (1980) ;
  No. 2 car - 57,964
   dscfm at 96°F
  No. 3 car = 65,409
   acfm at 126°F
                                   (continued)
                                         139

-------
                              TABLE 36 (continued)

               COKE OVEN  PUSHING  PROCESS AND  EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
No. 55
Wilputte2
19542,107

198831
7755,107
32,107
No. 75
Wilputte2
1954107
1978b>2
198831
7755,107
32,107
COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:

  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
     See previous pages^
Mitsubishi bench mounted hood-fixed duct
system serves each battery64,107

Common baghouse serves both batteries^

Wheelabrator-Frye6^
1980109
• Design flow rate = 138,000 acfm @ 275°F
                                   (continued)
                                       140

-------
                              TABLE 36 (continued)

              COKE OVEN  PUSHING  PROCESS AND EMISSION  CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:41

  MANUFACTURER:

  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:c

TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:0
No. 135
Koppers-
Becker2
19512 .107
1974b»2
198731
7755
32,107
No. 155
Wilputte2

19512,107
1977b>2

7755,101
32,107
No. 165
Wilputte2

!9492,107
1975b»2
198731
7755
32,107
See previous pages^
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBatteries No. 9 and 11 pushed empty in 1971, Batteries No. 10, 12, and 14
 pushed empty in 1974.1°'

^Involved end-flue rehabilitation.2

cBatteries No. 13, 15, and 16 were scheduled to incorporate a similar,
 Mitsubishi bench mounted hood-fixed duct system as on batteries No. 5 and 7
 by September I960.109
                                     141

-------
    TABLE  37.  UNITED  STATES  STEEL  CORP./LORAIN—CUYAHOGA WORKS  IN LORAIN,  OH

              COKE  OVEN  PUSHING  PROCESS  AND  EMISSION CONTROL DATA
ATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:

STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:a
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:b
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
D*
Koppers-
Becker2
19572

198211!
595 -
32
C5
Kopper-
Becker2
19562
19772

595
32
r«acm xcv-v-c-.w--!
1|5
Koppers-
Becker2
19552
19782

595
32
COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:0

TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:0
4,468 (all seven batteries combined)^
4,319 (all seven batteries combined)^
                                   (continued)
                                      142

-------
                                TABLE 37 (continued)

                COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:a
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:b
  NO. OF OVENS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (m):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:0

TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:c
                                                             K5
                                   Wilputte2  Wilputte2   Wilputte2   Wilputte2
                                   19552       19472       19472       19472
                                   19792       19702       19702       19702
                                                          1982111
                                                          595
595
32
595
32
                                                           32
                                               See previous
1982111
595
32
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

alncluded end-flue rehabilitation.2

^Batteries D, K and L are scheduled to be shut down in 1982;  stretch out
 applied for until 1985.51

CA11 batteries to be equipped with sheds ducted to baghouse by 1982.5,7,111
                                   143

-------
         TABLE 38.  UNITED STATES STEEL CORP./GENEVA WORKS IN PROVO, UT

               COKE  OVEN  PUSHING PROCESS  AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:

  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-In.):


COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:

  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:b

TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:b
No. I1     No. 21
No. 31
No. 41
Koppers;2 Koppers-Becker112 (all four
  batteries)
1944;2 19501 (all four batteries)
1979a>2    1979a>2

63 (each, all four batteries)1'5'112
13-0;112 13-65 (each, all four
 batteries)
5.000;1 3,5584 (all four batteries
  combined)
3,520 (all four batteries combined)^
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation,2

bSheds per battery are currently being installed; both batteries No. 1 and 2
 will be ducted to a common baghouse, as will both batteries No. 3 and 4.
                                                      -I -1 q
 Each baghouse will have the following specifications:-1-1-3
   Manufacturer—Micropul
   Flow rate—400,000 cfm
   10 modules, each with fan rated at 40,000 cfm, 17 in. W.G., and 156 BHP
   A/C - 7:1
   Negative pressure, with pulse-jet cleaning
                                   144

-------
   TABLE  39.  WHEELING-PITTSBURGH STEEL CORP./MON VALLEY PLANT IN MONESSEN,  PA

               COKE  OVEN  PUSHING  PROCESS AND  EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-Iri.):

COKE PRODUCTION:d

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. I1

Koppers-Becker^
No. 21

Koppers-Becker^
37c,ll4
13 -Ql
13-Ql
13-Ql
1,836 (both batteries combined)4
1,336 (both batteries combined)4

Minister Stein system serves each
battery2^'58'1-14

Common baghouse serves both
batteries23,58,114

Wheelabrator-Frye114
I960114
• Baghouse specifications;23*58
  120,000 acfm @ 275°F
  A/C = 5.3:1
  4 compartments with polyester bags
  Pulse-jet cleaning
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery No. 1 was rebuilt in 1981.114

^Battery No. 2 was rebuilt in 1979, which included conversion from a 3-hole,
 single collector main to a 4-hole, double collector main battery.2,114

cBattery No. 1 originally had 74 ovens; 37 ovens were rebuilt in 1981.which
 included conversion from a 3-hole, single collector main to a 4-hole double
 collector main battery.  The remaining 37 ovens are being converted to a
 4-hole, double collector main battery.H-4

^Production data reflects the original two battery (93 oven) operation.4
                                        145

-------
         TABLE 40.  WHEELING-PITTSBURGH STEEL CORP./STEUBENVILLE PLANT
                    IN EAST STEUBENVILLE,  WV

              COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATIONS
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
No. I5
Koppers2
1917b,115
1978e»2
472
32,115
No. 25
Koppers2
1917C.115
19786,2
472
32,115
No. 35
Koppers-Becker2
1917d,115
1978e, 2
512
32,115
COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:

  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:f

TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
4,400;1 5,2054 (all four batteries
  combined)
4,310 (all four batteries)4
                                   (continued)
                                     146

-------
               COKE OVEK PUSHING PROCESS AND
BATTERY DESIGNATION:a
MISSION CONTROL DATA
                                             Hi,. »«•
  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO* OF OVENS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:

  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
197655,115
795
65,115
See previous page


Bench-mounted hood-fixed duct
serves battery No. 85.7.23

Scrubber7.23,115

AAF5,23,115
19767,23,115
• Design flow rate = 146,500 acfm
  @ 400°F
• Design Ip = 33 in. H207
• 1 fans—total hp = 1,600?
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

 aPlant shut down Battery  No.  4 (53 ovens)  in 1977,  Battery No.  5 (53 ovens)
  In 1976,  and Battery No. 6 (63 ovens)  in  1977.H5

 h«dttery No. 1 rebuilt U\ 195S-*115

 cBattery No. 2 rebuilt in 1953.2,115

 dBattery No. 3 rebuilt in 1964.2>115

 elnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2

 ^Sheds ducted to a common baghouse for Battery Nos. 1, 2, and 3 by Federal
  Consent Decree, committed for 1982.  Baghouse specifications:  14 modules,
  each with  a 100 hp  F.D. fan; system will handle 300,000 acfm @ 125°F.79»115
                                         147

-------
     MATERIAL IN THIS SECTION SUBJECT TO CONFIDENTIALITY
    REVIEW AND IS NOT RELEASABLE AS OF FEBRUARY 1, 1982.
   FOR INFORMATION, CONTACT L. KESARI, U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY, DIVISION OF STATIONARY SOURCE ENFORCEMENT.
                                                                                     o
                                                                                     O
                                                                                   O
                                                                                   O

-------
          TABLE  1.   ALABAMA BYPRODUCTS  CORP./TARRANT  COKE  PLANT  IN TARRANT, AL

                  COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:a
No. 52
No. 62
No. I82;A2
  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:  198082
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:                252
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-ln.):        13-682
Koppers-Becker82   Koppers-Becker82   Wilputte82
19412,82           194i82             19682»82
                   198082             197982
                   292
                   13-682
                   782,82
                   16-082
COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
2,400 (for a four battery operation)^
2,100 (for a four battery operation)^
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM :

TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:0
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery No. 2 was permanently shut down in August 1979.82

bFoundation pads laid (1981) for the "Hawley Trav-L-Vent" system which will
 control battery Nos. 1, 5, and 6.82

cControl system for battery Nos. 1 and 6 will use a Buell baghouse for gas
 cleaning; A/C - 6.46:1 (based on 130,000 acfm flow rate, 4 compartments with
 polyester, needled felt bags.82
                                      148

-------
          TABLE 2.  ALLIED CHEMICAL CORP./ASHLAND PLANT IN ASHLAND, KY

               COKE  OVEN  PUSHING  PROCESS  AND  EMISSION CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
No. 32
Wilputte2
19532
1973C»2
762
4.52
No. 4a>2
Wilputte2
b
702
4.52. 5116
COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:


TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:d

  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:

  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
                               .d
3,480 (both batteries combined)4
2,100 (both batteries combined4

Minister Stein System (serves each
battery)2'116

Common high energy venturi scrubber116

Ducon?»16
1978 (battery No. 4)116»117
1980 (battery No. 3)118
• Design flow = 100,000 scfm
• Scrubber water flow = 1,300 gpm
  (observed) 26 Oct. 9 pm (max.)116
• Ap (scrubber) = 48 in. H20
  (design)116
• 2,000 hp motor for fan116
• Test Data (1978);e»116
  Inlet  - 128,631-146,137 acfm
  Outlet - 126,343-153,563 acfm
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery No. 4 was shut down in December 1980 due to low coke demand.118

bBattery No. 4 was rebuilt in 1978.2

clnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2

^Minister Stein-scrubber system designed for one battery pushing at a
 time.118

eTesting in 1978 included 4 runs during foundry coke production, and 4 runs
 during furnace coke production.116
                                       149

-------
                   TABLE  3.   CARONDELET  COKEa  IN ST.  LOUIS, MO

               COKE OVEN  PUSHING  PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:           A119          B2                C119


  MANUFACTURER:                Wilputte119   Simon-Carves2     Koppers119
  STARTUP DATE:                1913119       1913119           1952119
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:  1967119       1975119           1974119
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:                35119         18119             40119
  OVEN HEIGHT (m):              32            32                32

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:              1,000 (all three batteries combined)4
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:            800 (all three batteries combined)4

PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:  Shed (serves all three batteries)119

TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:   Common baghouse119.120

  MANUFACTURER:                AAF120
  DATE INSTALLED:              1980119>120
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:          • Design flow rate - 300,000 cfm51»120
                               • A/C - 2.74:1 (design):51
                               • A/C = 3.04:1 (actual)120
                               • 2,160 bags total with a cloth area of
                                 109,640 sq. ft.51
                               • 10 comparments with 1 compartment down at
                                 all times for reverse air cleaning.51
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aPlant was previously owned by Great Lakes Carbon Corp. prior to January
 1981.
                                       150

-------
         TABLE 4.  CHATTANOOGA COKE & CHEMICAL CORP. IN CHATTANOOGA,  TN

               COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION  CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURERS
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
No. I2
Semet/Solvay121
19182
I960121
24;2 255
42
No. 22
Wllputte121
19412
1979a>2
202
42
COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:

  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
576 (both batteries combined)121

Hawley Trav-L-Vent system (serves each
battery)122

Common baghouse122

Wheelabrator-Frye121
1980122
• Test Data (I960);121
  Avg flow rate - 130,000 acfm at 103°F
  Ayg flow rate - 119,000 dscfm
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation2
                                       151

-------
           TABLE  5.   CITIZENS  GAS  AND  COKE  UTILITY IN INDIANAPOLIS,  IN

               COKE  OVEN  PUSHING PROCESS  AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:8

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (in):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:

  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
E2

Wilputte2*123
19462
                                       472
                                       42
                                                          Koppers2
                                                          19412
                   41123
                   42
1,086 (E and H batteries combined)4
1,002 (E and H batteries combined)4

Hawley Trav-L-Vent system (serves each
battery)7

Common baghouse-'»124

Mikropul Corp.7»123
19797,124
• Design gas flow = 100,000 acfm at
  70°F;7 at 130°Fl23
• Design A/C = 6.24:17>123
• Felted Nomex bags7
• Pulse type cleaning7
                                   (continued)
                                   152

-------
                               TABLE  5  (continued)

               COKE  OVEN  PUSHING  PROCESS  AND  EMISSION  CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (m):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:

  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
12,123

Dravo-Still125
19792
19792

722
52,125
1,645124
Hawley Trav-L-Vent systeml23
Mikropul123
1980123
• Rated at 149,000 acfm at 425°Fl23»l24
• Design A/C = 5.4:ll23
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBatteries F and G, both 40 oven Wilputte batteries started up in 1926 and
 1929, respectively, were shut down in 1979.I23
                                       153

-------
                    TABLE  6.  DETROIT  COKE  CO.  IN DETROIT, MI

               COKE  OVEN PUSHING  PROCESS  AND  EMISSION  CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:b

TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:

  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. 62

Semet/Solvay2
19682,126
I978a»2

702,126
16-8126
2, ISO4
2,000*

Minister Stein system7
AAF127
19797
• 168,000 cfm (during push)127
• AMERtherm synthetic fabric
  filtersl27
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2
       Manager indicated that Minister Stein system is currently not in use
 since operating costs equal coke value. 128
                                      154

-------
                TABLE 7.  DONNER-HANNA COKE CORP. IN BUFFALO, NY

               COKE  OVEN PUSHING  PROCESS AND  EMISSION  CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
AB2
Koppers2
19 512

512
42
No. 32
Koppers2
19642

502
42
No. 42
Koppers2
19672

502
42
COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:3
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:

  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
3,004 (all three batteries combined)4
3,004 (all three batteries combined)4

PECT Donner-Hanna spray system (serves
battery AB)33

Water sprays33

PECT/Donner-Hanna3 3
197633
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aNo push controls for battery Nos. 3 or 4.33
                                       155

-------
                      TABLE  8.  EMPIRE  COKE  CO.  IN HOLT,  AL

               COKE  OVEN  PUSHING  PROCESS  AND EMISSION CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (m):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:b»c

TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
No. 1
                                            12
Semet/Solvay90
1906a»90
202,90
32
No. 22

Semet/Solvay90
402,90
32
360 (both batteries combined)*
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery was rebuilt in 1978.2

^No controls necessary; plant located in attainment area.90

°Minister Stein system being considered.5
                                      156

-------
       TABLE 9.  MERCIER CORP./ERIE COKE AND CHEMICALS IN PAINESVILLE, OH

               COKE  OVEN PUSHING  PROCESS  AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (m):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:

  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. I2

Koppers-Becker2
232
42 ,  ,
                       No. 22

                       Koppers-Becker2
                       1926*.129
                       232
                       42
450 (both batteries combined)4
400 (both batteries combined)4

Shed (serves both batteries)m

Common b aghouse-*
Senaca — Environmental
1980H1,129
• Rated flow rate - 150,000 cfm130
• 6 compartment sm» l-^O
• Negative pressure design using 60 hp
  fan13*
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery was rebuilt in 1972.'
                                       157

-------
          TABLE 10.  INDIANA GAS AND CHEMICAL CORP. IN TERRE  HAUTE,  IN

               COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m):
No. I2
19192
1978a»2

302
42
No. 22
19262
1978a»2

302
42
COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:

  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2
400 (both batteries combined)4
340 (both batteries combined)4

Hawley Trav-L-Vent system (serves each
battery)7*132

Common venturi scrubber^-33

Riley Engineering133
1975134
• Design flow rate =• 100,000 cfm132
• Test Data (1979):i133
  99,800 acfm
  Ap = 19 in. H20
                                    158

-------
       TABLE 11.  IRONTON COKE CORP./A SUBSIDIARY OF MCLOUTH STEEL CORP.
                  IN IRONTON, OH

               COKE  OVEN PUSHING  PROCESS  AND EMISSION  CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:6

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:

  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. lb>2

Semet/Solvayl35
19172,135
1947d,135

68135
11-11135
No. 2C>2

Wilputtel35
1954135
19786,135

24135
12-2135
2,650 (for a three-battery operation)^
2,223 (for a three-battery operation)^

Mitsubishi bench-mounted hood-fixed
duct (serves each battery)136

Common baghousel3'

Mikropull38
19797,139
• Exhaust flow rate = 160,000 acfm at
  260°F (max.)138,139
• Six compartments—negative pressure—
  2,160 Dacron bags (total)139
• A/C = 5.24:1 (6 compartments on
  line)139
• Pulse jet cleaning!39
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery No. 3 (76 oven-Wilputte) presently shut down.51

^Battery No. 1 operating on a 48-hour coke time to keep ovens hot.51

cBattery No. 2 was shut down between Jan. 1980 and Feb. 1981.  Presently the
 battery is on hot idle.^1,135

dInvolved the addition of ovens.135

elnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2,135
                                     159

-------
     TABLE 12.  JIM WALTER RESOURCE, INC./COKE, IRON AND CHEMICALS DIVISION
                IN BIRMINGHAM, AL

              COKE  OVEN PUSHING  PROCESS  AND  EMISSION  CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION: a
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in. ):
No. 32
Koppers2
19522
1979b,82
302
14-082
No. 4 2
Koppers2
19562
1981b,82
302
14-082
No. 52
Koppers2
19592
198ib,82
602
14-082
COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:c

TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:
2,760 (for a five battery operation)4
2,400 (for a five battery operation)4
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery Nos. 1 and 2 were shut down in Aug. 1980.82

^Involved standpipe replacement and topside work.82

cHawley Trav-L-Vent system scheduled for installation on Battery Nos. 3, 4,
 and 5 in 1982 (consent decree).90*140
                                       160

-------
      TABLE  13.  KOPPERS  CO.,  INC./INDUSTRIAL  PRODUCTS  DIVISION,  ERIE  PLANT
                IN ERIE,  PA

              COKE  OVEN  PUSHING  PROCESS  AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATIONS
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in. ):
A2
Koppers2
1943b,141

12-Q141
23 2
B2
Koppers2
1943b>2

12-Q141
352
COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:

  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
730;1 6254 (both batteries combined)
600 (both batteries combined)*

Koppers-Erikar (serves both
batteries)^*7

Scrubber7

AAF142.143
19777,143
• Design flow = 54,000 acfm at 700°F7»143
• Water flow = 300 gpml43
• Ap (operating) = 25 in. ^O7
• L/G = 5.6 (design-calcuated)143
• Curtains completely cover quench car
  during travel7
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aFacility previously owned and operated by Interlake, Inc.l

bBattery was rebuilt in 1971.2
                                   161

-------
           TABLE 14.  KOPPERS CO. INC./INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS DIVISION,
                      TOLEDO PLANT IN TOLEDO, OH

               COKE  OVEN  PUSHING  PROCESS  AND  EMISSION  CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (m):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:

  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
C2,144

Wilputte2
19532,144
4144



8144
7024

Koppers-one-spot car'»

Scrubber145,l46
Riley Engineering146
1980144,145
• Test Data (I960);147
  Flow rate (range) - 54,216-
   56,384 acfm
  Temperature (range) »
   138-145°F
  Ap (avg. range) » 18.9-22.5
   in H20
  Scrubber water flow rate
   (range) - 700-750 gpm
  L/G (@ 56,384 acfm and 750
   gpm) =13.3
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery C was on hot idle from Sept. 1980 to Aug. 1981.145
                                       162

-------
           TABLE 15.  KOPPERS CO., INC./INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS DIVISION,
                      WOODWARD PLANT IN WOODWARD, AL

               COKE OVEN PUSHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in. ):
No. I2
Koppers2
197782
602
4m;2 3m148
No. 4A & 4Bb
Koppers2
194982
1981^,82
582
14-082
COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:

  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
2,047 (all five batteries combined)^
1,272 (all five batteries combined)^

Koppers one-spot car (serves each
battery)82,148

High energy venturi scrubber-^S
197982,140
• Design flow (inlet) = 24,700 scfm148
• Design flow (outlet) = 29,500 scfrn1*8
• Ap = 20 in. H20 (design)3
• Test Data (1980) ;148
  Avg. flow = 24,850 scfm
  Avg. Ap = 27.8 in. H20
                                                                 c.*} t 3\.
                                                                 \148
                                    (continued)
                                    163

-------
                              TABLE 15 (continued)

              COKE OVEN  PUSHING  PROCESS  AND  EMISSION  CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
No. 2A2
Koppers2
197782
4C-148
4; 2 3148
No. 2B2
Koppers2
193782
1978C>82
38148
4;2 3148
No. 5b»2
Koppers2
195282
1978C»82
302
14-0 ft82
COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:

  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
          See previous page
Koppers-one-spot car (serves each
battery)82

High energy venturi scrubber82
198082,148
• Design flow rate = 29,500 scfm at
  Ap = 20 in. H2ol48
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery No. 3 was permanently shut down in Nov. 1974.82

^Battery Nos. 4A, 4B, and 5 were idling hot for a 14-month period (May 1980-
 July 1981) and were recharged in July 1981 .€2

clnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.82
                                   164

-------
  TABLE 16.  MILWAUKEE SOLVEY COKE CO./PICKAND MATHER AND CO. IN MILWAUKEE, WI

               COKE  OVEN  PUSHING  PROCESS  AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (m):

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:

  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. 32
No. 42
402
32,
602
32
800 (both batteries combined)4
725 (both batteries combined)4

Mitsubishi bench-mounted hood-fixed
duct (serves each battery)'

Scrubber149
1979149
• Ap - 11 in. HgO5
• Low L/G ratio-*
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery was rebuilt in 1974.2
                                      165

-------
           TABLE 17.  PHILADELPHIA COKE CO., INC. IN PHILADELPHIA, PA

               COKE  OVEN  PUSHING PROCESS  AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (m) :

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:

  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
A/B2

Koppers-Becker^O
19292
742
42
9404
8804

Hawley Trav-L-Vent
         » 151
Baghouse150*151

Envirotech150*151
1980150,151
• Design flow - 100,000
  scfm151
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
                                       166

-------
                TABLE 18.  TONAWANDA COKE CORP. IN TONAWANDA, NY

               COKE  OVEN  PUSHING  PROCESS  AND  EMISSION CONTROL DATA


BATTERY DESIGNATION:3                            No.

  MANUFACTURER:                                  Wilputte2
  STARTUP DATE:                                  19622
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:                                  602
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):                          12-234

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:                                1,790A
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:                                 9004

PUSHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

TYPE OF GAS CLEANING SYSTEM:


ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery No. 1 was shut down In June 1972.34
                                       167

-------
     MATERIAL IN THIS SECTION  SUBJECT  TO  CONFIDENTIALITY

    REVIEW AND IS NOT RELEASABLE AS OF FEBRUARY 1,  1982.

   FOR INFORMATION, CONTACT L. KESARI,  U.S.  ENVIRONMENTAL

PROTECTION AGENCY, DIVISION OF STATIONARY SOURCE ENFORCEMENT.
                                                                                    o
                                                                                    o
                                                                                    O Hrj
                                                                                    
-------
                                   REFERENCES

                           COKE OVEN PUSHING CONTROLS
 1.   World Steel Industry Data Handbook:   Vol.  I.   The United States.
     McGraw-Hill Magazine.   1978.   pp.  20-25.   (Reliability No.  4.)

 2.   Technical Approach for a Coke Production Cost Model.  PEDCo
     Environmental,  Inc., EPA Contract  No. 68-02-3071, pp. 39-50.
     (Reliability No.  4.)

 3.   EPA Region V file review by GCA/Technology Division.  December 1981.

 4.   Development Document for Proposed  Effluent Limitations Guidelines and
     Standards for the Iron & Steel Manufacturing Point Source Categories.
     EPA-400/l-79/024a, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Effluent
     Guidelines Division, Office of Water and Waste Management,  Washington,
     DC, Oct.  1979.   pp. 18-49.  (Reliability No.  4.)

 5.   Telephone conversation.  Bernard Bloom, U.S.  Environmental Protection
     Agency, Washington, DC, to Michael Jasinski,  GCA/Technology Division.
     December  1980.   (Reliability No. 2.)

 6.   EPA Region V files (notes by Mr. Harris,  Ohio EPA after a 1979 plant
     inspection).

 7.   Goldman,  L. J.,  and D. W. Coy.  Technical Support Document for Control of
     Coke Oven Pushing Emissions.   Research Triangle Institute,  Research
     Triangle  Park,  NC.  EPA Contract No. 687-01-4141.  RACT Box No.
     506379-506486.   (Reliability No. 4.)

 8.   Sampling  and Analysis of Particulate Emissions from Inlet and Outlet of
     Coke Plant East  and West Precipitators, ARMCO Steel Corporation/Houston,
     Texas. Southwestern Labs.  November 16-18 and 22, 1976.  JACA Library.
     (Reliability No.  1.)

 9.   Stack Tests at ARMCO/Houston—Coke Side Shed.  Oct. 26-28, 1976.  South-
     western Laboratories.   RACT Box No.  505465-505538.  (Reliability No. 1.)

10.   Coke Oven Wet Electrostatic Precipitator Stack Emission Sampling;
     Particulates, Phenol and Alyanides.   ARMCO Steel Corporation/Houston,
     Texas. July 29 and August 1, 1977.   Southwestern Labs.  JACA Library.
     (Reliability No.  1.)
                                      168

-------
11.  Coke Oven Wet Electrostatic Precipitator Stack Emission Sampling;
     Particulates, Phenol and Alyanides.  ARMCO Steel Corporation/Houston,
     Texas-  May 1, 1979.  Southwestern Labs.  JACA Library.  (Reliability
     No. 1.)

12.  Coke Oven Wet Electrostatic Precipitator Stack Emission Sampling;
     Particulates, Phenol and Alyamides.  ARMCO Steel Corporation/Houston,
     Texas.  July 3 and 5, 1979.  Southwestern Labs.  JACA Library.
     (Reliability No. 1.)

13.  EPA Region V files (Renewal Permit Appl.—dated 1/26/79, Permit
     180901000GP013).

14.  Telephone conversation  Sceve Samorgin, Ohio Environmental Protection
     Agency—Southwest District to Sandy Beaton, GCA/Technology Division.
     November 1981.  (Reliability No. 2.)

15.  Summary sheets compiled by PEDCo Environmentalists, Inc. from stack test
     reports contained in regional EPA offices.  Given to JACA Corp. for steel
     library by Tom Maslany, EPA Region III.  (Reliability No. 1.)

16.  EPA Region V files (Permit Appl. for No. 3 Coke Plant—dated 8/3/78—
     prepared by Bruce Steiner).

17.  Telephone conversation.  Ed Luebering, SW District Ohio EPA to Gene
     Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  March 9, 1981.  (Reliability No. 2.)

18.  Telephone conversation and letter response.  Bill Nuver, Pennsylvania
     Department of Environmental Resources, Bethlehem, PA to Sandy Beaton,
     GCA/Technology Division.  November 1981.  (Reliability No. 2.)

19.  Letter communication.  Anthony F. Fazio, Vice President, Chemico Air
     Pollution Control Corporation, a Division of Envirotech Corporation to
     Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division.  December 1980.  (Reliability
     No. 4.)

20.  Letter from J. McGrogan, Pennsylvania Dept. of Environmental Resources,
     Weinersvllle, PA to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  February 19,
     1981.  (Reliability No. 1.)

21.  Draft Inspection Report, Halcon-II Car Operation/Battery 5, Bethlehem
     Steel Corp., Bethlehem, PA.  JACA Corp.  September 19, 1979.  RACT Box
     No. 503615-503594.  (Reliability No. 1.)

22.  RACT Box No. 503752-5903756 (Reliability No. 1.)

23.  Telephone conversation.  Bernard Bloom, U.S. Environmental Protection
     Agency, Washington, DC to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division.
     February 1980.  (Reliability No. 2.)
                                       169

-------
24.  Petroccia, M. et al.  Assessment of Air Emissions from and Controls for
     Iron and Steelmaklng Sources.  Bethlehem Steel Corporation/Burns Harbor
     Coke Butteries I and 2.  Chesterton, Indiana.  GCA/Technology Division
     Draft Final Report.  Prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
     July 1980.  (Reliability No. 1.)

25.  Telephone conversation.  Andy Sunderland, Indiana State Air Pollution
     Control to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  March 3, 1981.
     (Reliability No.  2)

26.  Symows, Carl R..  Coke Oven Pushing—Emission Control with a Hooded
     One-Spot Coke Receiver and Remote Gas Cleaner.  Presented at Technical
     Conference on Control of Air Emissions from Coke Plants.  Pittsburgh,
     PA.  April 17-19.  pp. 47-53.  (Reliability No. 3.)

27.  Iron & Steel Engineer.  57(6):76.  June 1980.  (Reliability No. 3.)

28.  Stack Tests at Bethlehem Steel Corp./Burns Harbor.  RACT Box No.
     504765-504772.  (Reliability No. 1.)

29.  RACT Box No. 503717-503719.  (Reliability No. 1.)

30.  Telephone conversation.  Bob Clark, Pennsylvania Department of
     Environmental Resources to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division.
     October 29, 1981.  (Reliability No. 2.)

31.  Computer printout.  Prepared by PEDCo Environmentalists, Inc. for U.S.
     Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.  Coke battery data
     compilation for the United States.  (Reliability No. 2-3.)

32.  RACT No. 504919-504942.  No. 18 Battery, Bethlehem Steel Corp./Johnstown
     Push Control Car Stack Tests.  (Reliability No. 1.)

33.  Telephone conversation.  Henry Sandonato, New York State Department of
     Environmental Conservation to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.
     February 17, 1981.  (Reliability No. 2.)

34.  Letter response.  Richard Craig, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
     Region II to William Farino, GCA/Technology Division.  December 1981.
     (Reliability No. 1.)

35.  Telephone conversation.  Mark Sylvester, Maryland State Department of
     Health and Mental Hygiene to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division.
     February 13, 1981.  (Reliability No. 2.)

36.  GCA/Technology Division.  Ralph Hall, Maryland State Department of Health
     and Mental Hygiene to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division.  October
     29, 1981.  (Reliability No. 2.)

37.  Pollutant Control of Coke-Oven Emissions.  Iron & Steel Engineer,
     Industry News.  57(9):107.  Sept. 1980.  (Reliability No. 3.)
                                     170

-------
38.  Oliver, J. F. and J. T. Sanne.  Control of Visible Emissions at CF&I's
     Coke Plant—Pueblo, Colorado.  JAPCA.  29(9):920-925.  Sept. 1976.
     (Reliability No. 1.)

39.  Dion, J. A. and G. D. Young.  Coke Battery Survey.  CF&I Steel
     Corporation in Pueblo, Colorado.  April 1979.  EPA-330/1-78-005.  RACT
     Box No. 503469 (start).  (Reliability No. 1.)

AO.  Telephone conversation.  Dennis Myers, Colorado State Department of
     Health to Stephen Piper, GCA/Technology Division.  February 1981.
     (Reliability No. 2.)

41.  Emission testing of North and South Coke Plant Push Control Gas Cleaning
     Cars.  CF&I Steel Corp./Pueblo Works.  Final Report.  Almega Project No.
     1-5394.  April 15, 1980.  JACA Library-  (Reliability No. 1.)

42.  Nunno, T., et al.  Assessment of Air Emissions from Steel Plant Sources.
     Ford Motor Co./River Rouge Plant—Coke Plant Inspection.  GCA/Technology
     Division Draft Final Report No. TR-81-38-G.  April 1981.  Prepared for
     U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.  (Reliability No. 1.)

43.  EPA Region V files (Ford Motor Co. response to EPA questionnaire dated
     February 21, 1978).

44.  Copper, F., et al., Emission Testing and Evaluation of Ford/Koppers Coke
     Pushing Control System:  Volume 1.  Final Report.  EPA-600/2-77-187a.
     September 1977.  (Reliability No. 1.)

45.  EPA Regon V files (Ford Motor Co. 3rd quarter progress report to EPA—
     10/16/81).

46.  McClelland, R. 0.  Coke Oven Smokeless Pushing System Design Manual.
     EPA-650/2-74-076.  Sept. 1974.  RACT Box No. 503811-503884.  (Reliability
     No. 3.)

47.  Telephone conversation.  Phil Pekron, U.S. Environmental Protection
     Agency, Region V to Sandy Beaton, GCA/Technology Division.  October
     1981.  (Reliability No. 2.)

48.  Spawn, P.  Assessment of Air Emissions from Steel Plant Operations.
     Inland Steel Co./Indiana Harbor Works—Plant Inspection.  GCA/Technology
     Division Final Report No. TR-80-85-G.  Prepared for U.S. Environmental
     Protection Agency.  April 1980.  (Reliability No. 1.)

49.  Inland Steel Publication.  Air, Water and Inland Steel.  1979.
     (Reliability No. 4.)

50.  EPA Region V files (Letter from Inland Steel to EPA—August 1981).

51.  EPA Region V engineers comments to GCA questionnaire.  December 1981.
                                      171

-------
52.  Report of Emissions Tests at Inland Steel Corp. Coke Plant No. 3—Coke
     Oven Battery C, Coke Side Shed.  Clean Air Engineering.  Tests during
     March 18, 1975.  RACT Box No. 505035-505132.  (Reliability No. 1.)

53.  Telephone conversation.  Don Kuh, Indiana State Air Pollution to Gene
     Bergson,  GCA/Technology Division.  March 4, 1981.  (Reliability No. 4.)

54.  Participate Emissions Testing on Push Control System Scrubber Exhaust.
     Inland Steel Corp./Indiana Harbor Works—Coke Battery No. 11.  Almega
     Corp.  Nov. 17, 1978.  RACT Box No. 505165-505306.  (Reliability No. 1.)

55.  Cost Effectiveness Model for Pollution Control of Coke Facilities.
     EPA-609/2-79-185.  August 1979.  Table 8.  (Reliability No. 4.)

56.  EPA Region V files (Test Report on Interlake Steel's Co. Push Control
     System—June 1980).

57.  Telephone conversation.  J. Sokorowski, City of Chicago Department of
     Inspectional Services to Marc Grant, GCA/Technology Division.  March 5,
     1981.  (Reliability No. 2.)

58.  Telephone conversation.  Ken Bowman, Pennsylvania Department of
     Environmental Resources to Mike Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division.
     February  18, 1981.  (Reliability No. 2.)

59.  RACT Box No. 503720-503722.  (Reliability No. 1.)

60.  Iron & Steel Engineer.  56(3):72.  March 1979.  (Reliability No. 4.)

61.  Petroccia, M. W., et al.  Assessment of Air Emissions from and Controls
     for Iron and Steelmaking Sources.  J&L Steel Corp./Aliquippa Works.
     GCA/Technology Division Final Report No. TR-81-57-G.  Prepared for U.S.
     Environmental Protection Agency.  July 1981.  (Reliability No. 1.)

62.  Telephone conversation.  Ted Davis, NE District Ohio EPA to Gene Bergson,
     GCA/Technology Division.  February 27, 1981.  (Reliability No. 2.)

63.  EPA Region V files (J&L Steel Corp. letter to EPA dated April 1978).

64.  Telephone conversation.  Edward Wojciechowski, U.S. Environmental
     Protection Agency, Region V to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.
     February  4, 1981.  (Reliability No. 2.)

65.  EPA Region V files (J&L letter to EPA—1981).

66.  Telephone conversation.  S. Banninthaya, Allegheny County Department of
     Health to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  February 12, 1981.
     (Reliability No. 2.)

67.  Telephone conversation.  S. Bannithaya, Allegheny County Department of
     Health to Sandy Beaton, GCA/Technology Division.  November 3, 1981.
     (Reliability No. 2.)
                                  !
                                    172

-------
68.  Spawn, P. and R. Li.  Assessment of Air Emissions from and Controls for
     Iron and Steelmaking Operations.  Kaiser Steel Corp. in Fontana, CA—Coke
     Plant Inspection.  GCA/Technology Division.Final Report No. TR-79-53-G.
     Prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.  December 1980.
     (Reliability No. 1.)

69.  Telephone conversation.  Lois Green, U.S. Environmental Protection
     Agency, Region IX to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division.  November
     1981.  (Reliability No. 2.)

70.  Cochran, L. M. and D. A. Mitchell.  New Coke Oven Emissions Control
     System at Lone Star Steel Company.  Presented at the 73rd Annual Meeting
     of the Air Pollution Control Association.  Montreal, Canada.  June 22-27,
     1980.  pp. 1-6.  (Reliability No. 3.)

71.  Telephone conversation.  Tom Blair, Radian Corporation to Gene Bergson,
     GCA/Technology Division.  March 3, 1981.  (Reliability No. 2.)

72.  Testing at Lone Star Steel Corp. in Lone Star, TX.  Coke Push Control
     System on Battery "C".  Testing September-December 1979.  (Reliability
     No. 1.)

73.  EPA Region V files (National Steel/Great Lakes Steel Division response to
     EPA questionnaire—2/21/78).

74.  EPA Region V files (Data supplied to EPA by National Steel/Great Lakes
     Steel Division).

75.  Telephone conversation.  Anton Telford, Illinois State Environmental
     Protection Agency to Sandy Beaton, GCA/Technology Division.  October
     1981.  (Reliability No. 2.)

76.  EPA Region V files (Stack tests at NSC/Granite City.  No. 2 Push Control
     Car in 1980).

77.  Fornadley, R. J.  Granite City:  Bold Modernization of an Integrated
     Steel Plant.  Iron & Steel Engineer.  August 1980.  pp. SL-67-SL-80.
     (Reliability No. 3.)

78.  Spawn, P.  et al.  Assessment of Air Emissions from Iron and Steelmaking
     Sources.  National Steel Corp./Weirton Steel Division—Plant Inspection
     in August 1981.  GCA/Technology Division Final Report No. TR-81-118-G.
     Prepard for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.  November 1981.
     (Reliability No. 1.)

79.  Telephone conversation.  John Raggi, West Virginia Air Pollution Control
     to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  February 17, 1981.
     (Reliability No. 2.)
                                      173

-------
80.  Metzger, D. J. and D. F. Cairns.  Development of the Two-Step Quench
     (TSQ) System.  Paper presented at the Lake Michigan States Section, Air
     Pollution Control Association, Specialty Conference.  Chicago, IL.  April
     1981.  (Reliability No. 3.)

81.  Koppers One-Spot Push Control System Design Data.  National Steel
     Corp./Weirton Steel Division.  Coke Battery 1-1.  Supplied to
     GCA/Technology Division by Tom Shiland, U.S. Environmental Protection
     Agency, Region III.  October 1981.  (Reliability No. 2.)

82.  Letter response.  Paul Pate, Director of Jefferson County Department of
     Health to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division.  December 1981.
     (Reliability No. 1.)

83.  EPA Region V files (Arthur D. little report on a new coke battery at
     Republic Steel Corp. in Chicago, IL—1978).

84.  Dust Collector Study at Republic Steel Corp./Chicago District in Chicago,
     IL.  Testing by Mostardi-Platt Associates, Inc.  March 1977.  RACT Box
     No. 505009-505034.  (Reliability No. 1.)

85.  Letter response.  Gary Nied, Cleveland Division of Air Pollution to Gene
     Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  March 9, 1981.  (Reliability No. 1.)

86.  Stack Tests at Republic Steel Corp./Cleveland District.  No. 1 Coke
     Battery Push Control System.  November 28 and 29, 1979.  RACT Box No.
     504869-504888.  (Reliability No. 1.)

87.  Stack Tests at Republic Steel Corp./Cleveland District.  Coke Pushing
     Emission Tests on the Koppers No. 12 One-Spot Gas Cleaning Car.  June
     1979.  RACT Box No. 504889-504918.  (Reliability No. 1.)

88.  Telephone conversation.  Mr. Habib, Cleveland Air Pollution Control to
     Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  February 27, 1981.  (Reliability
     No. 2.)

89.  EPA Region V files (Stack Test Reports—Republic Steel Corp./Cleveland
     District).

90.  Telephone conversation.  Sue Robertson, Alabama State Air Pollution
     Control to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division.  October 27, 1981.
     (Reliability No. 2.)

91.  EPA Region V files (Trip Report by Dan Bakk—2/20/80).

92.  EPA Region V files (1974 permits).

93.  Spawn, P., et al.  Assessment of Air Emissions from and Controls for Iron
     and Steelmaking Sources.  United States Steel Corporation/Clairton Works
     Coke Plant in Clairton, PA.  GCA/Technology Division Draft Final Report
     No. TR-80-30-G.  Prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
     April 1981.  (Reliability No. 1.)

                                      174

-------
 94. Source Sheet on USSC/Clairton Coke Battery No. 7, RACT No. 500478.
     (Reliability No. 1.)

 95. Source Sheet on USSC/Clairton Coke Battery No. 8, RACT No. 500484.
     (Reliability No. 1.)

 96. Source Sheet on USSC/Clairton Coke Battery No. 9, RACT No. 500490.
     (Reliability No. 1.)

 97. Source Sheet on USSC/Clairton Coke Battery No. 17, RACT No.
     505575-505870.  (Reliability No. 1.)

 98. Source Sheet on USSC/Clairton Coke'Battery No. 16, RACT No. 500528.
     (Reliability No. 1.)

 99. Source Sheet on USSC/Clairton Coke Battery No. 17, RACT No. 500541.
     (Reliability No. 1.)

100. Source Sheet on USSC/Clairton Coke Battery No. 19, RACT No. 500553.
     (Reliability No. 1.)

101. Source Sheet on USSC/Clairton Coke Battery No. 20, RACT No. 500562.
     (Reliability No. 1.)

102. Source Sheet on USSC/Clairton Coke Battery No. 21, RACT No. 500569.
     (Reliability No. 1.)

103. Source Sheet on USSC/Clairton Coke Battery No. 22, RACT No. 500581.
     (Reliability No. 1.)

104. Spawn, P. et al.  Assessment of Air Emissions from and Controls for Iron
     and Steelmaking Sources.  United States Steel Corporation/Fairfield Works
     in Fairfield, AL.  GCA/Technology Division Draft Final Report No.
     TR-79-59-G.  Prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
     September 1979.  (Reliability No. 1.).

105. Coke Battery Survey Procedures, Description, and Data Presentation.
     USSC/Fairfield Works in Fairfield, AL.  EPA-330/1-77-012.  December
     1977.  RACT No. 501519.  (Reliability No. 1.)

106. Stack Test on Battery No. 2—Push Control Car.  USSC/Fairfield Works in
     Fairfield, AL.  RACT No. 504783-504806.  (Reliability No. 1.).

107. EPA Region V files (U.S. Steel Corp./Gary Works response to EPA
     interrogatory—May 1979).

108. EPA Region V files (U.S. Steel Corp./Gary Works Litigation Report—12/77).

109. Telephone conversation.  Roland Elvambuena, City of Gary Health
     Department to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  March 1981.
     (Reliability No. 2.)
                                      175

-------
110. EPA Region V files (Test Reports on U.S. Steel Corp./Gary Works Emission
     Sources)•

111. Letter response.  Dennis Bush, Ohio State Environmental Protection Agency
     to Sandy Beaton, GCA/Technology Division.  November 1981.  (Reliability
     No. 1.)

112. National Enforcement Investigation Center, U.S. Environmental Protection
     Agency.  Report on Plant Inspection at U.S. Steel Corp./Geneva Works.
     1977.  (Reliability No. 2.)

113. Letter from U.S. Steel Corp./Geneva Works to Connally Hears, U.S.
     Environmental Protection Agency, Region VIII.  Baghouse—Coke Side Shed
     Design Data.  April 24, 1981.  (Reliability No. 2.)

114. Letter response.  Richard Thomas, Pennsylvania Department of
     Environmental Resources to Sandy Beaton, GCA/Technology Division.
     December 1981.  (Reliability No. 1.)

115. Telephone conversation and letter response.  John Raggi, West Virginia
     Air Pollution Control to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division.
     November 1981.  (Reliability No. 1.)

116. Emissions Test Report.  Submitted to Allied Chemical Company, Semet-
     Solvay Division, Ashland, KY.  The Minister Stein System.  York Research
     Corp.  Report No. 1-9868-04.  June 7, 1979.  (Reliability No. 1.)

117. Skalos, C. R.  The Design and Start Up of a Dravo/Still, Minister Stein
     Type Coke Oven Pushing Emission Control System.  Presented at Technical
     Conference on:  Control of Air Emission from Coke Plants.  Pittsburgh,
     PA.  April 17-19, 1979.  pp. 64-73.  (Reliability No. 2.)

118. Letter response.  James Dills, State of Kentucky Department of Natural
     Resources and Health to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division.
     November 19, 1981.  (Reliability No. 1.)

119. Letter response.  Richard Knapp, City of St. Louis Department of Air
     Pollution Control to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division.  November
     2, 1981.  (Reliability No. 1.)

120. Telephone conversations.  Richard Knapp and Tom Schippes, City of St.
     Louis Department of Health, and Missouri State Air Pollution Control,
     respectively, to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  February 24,
     1981.  (Reliability No. 2.)

121. Telephone conversation.  Harvey Rice, Chattanooga Air Pollution Control
     to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division.  October 26, 1981.
     (Reliability No. 2.)

122. Telephone conversation.  Harvey Rice, Chattanooga Air Pollution Control
     Bureau to Mike Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division.  February 18, 1981.
     (Reliability No. 2.)

                                        176

-------
123. EPA Region V files (Citizens Gas and Coke Data supplied to EPA—1979).

124. Telephone conversation.  Dave Jordan, Indianapolis Air Pollution Control
     Board to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  March A, 1981.
     (Reliability No. 2.)

125. The Fabric Filter Newsletter.  Mcllvaine, Inc. (56):5.  June 10, 1980.
     (Reliability No. A.)

126. EPA Region V files (Detroit Coke).

127. Fabric Collector First For Coke Oven Emission Control.  Iron & Steel
     Engineer, 56(2):102.  February 1979.  (Reliability No. A.)

128. EPA Region V files (EPA Inspection on 5-28-80 at Detroit Coke).

129. Telephone conversation.  Dennis Bush, NE District Ohio EPA to Gene
     Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  February 27, 1981.  (Reliability
     No. 2.)

130. EPA Region V files (Ohio EPA Interoffice Memo From D. Bugh dated June
     1980).

131. EPA Region V files (Consent Decree dated 2/5/79).

132. EPA Region V files (Phil Pekron 1979 Trip Report at Indiana Gas and
     Chemical Corp.).

133. Stack Emission Test Report on Coke Pushing Scrubber.  Indiana Gas &
     Chemical Co./Terre Haute, IN.  Environmental Technology & Engineering
     Corp.  October 8-10, 1979.  JACA Library.  (Reliability No. 1.)

13A. Telephone conversation.  Ken Kearney, Indiana State Air Pollution Control
     to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  March A, 1981.  (Reliability
     No. 2.)

135. EPA Region V files (Plant Progress Report, May 1981, to EPA Region V).

136. Advertisement in Iron & Steel Engineer,  57(8).  August 1980.
     (Reliability No. 3.)

137. Facility Scheduled for 1979 Start-Up.  Iron & Steel Engineer,
     56(10):103.  October 1979.  (Reliability No. 3.)

138. Telephone conversation.  Frank Phillips,  Portsmouth City Health
     Department to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  February 27, 1981.
     (Reliability No. 2.)

139. Fuller, D. H.  The Alliance/Mitsubishi Pushing Emission Control System at
     Ironton Coke Corp.  Iron and Steel Engineer, 58(5):29-3A.  May 1981.
     (Reliability No. 3.)


                                       177

-------
140. Telephone conversation.  Veda Hampton, Jefferson County Department of
     Health to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  February 25, 1981.
     (Reliability No. 2.)

141. RACT Box No. 503715-503716.  (Reliability No. 1.)

142. Telephone conversation.  Larry Wonders, Pennsylvania Department of
     Environmental Resources to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.
     February 17, 1981.  (Reliability No. 2.)

143. Telephone conversation.  Bill Charleton, Pennsylvania Department of
     Environmental Resources in Meadsville, PA, to Sandy Beaton,
     GCA/Technology Division.  November 1981.  (Reliability No. 2.)

144. EPA Region V files (Permits—no date).

145. Telephone conversation.  Tom Doktor, Toledo Pollution Control Agency to
     Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  February 27, 1981.  (Reliability
     No. 2.)

146. EPA Region V files (Acurex observations of Koppers 1980 Stack Tests).

147. EPA Region V files (Stack Test by Koppers—1980).

148. Jasinski, M. R.  Field Inspection Report of Major Air Point Source
     Facilities in Region IV.  EPA Contract No. 68-01-4143.  RE;  Koppers Co.,
     Inc./Woodward Coke Plant.  Inspected by GCA on July 8 and 9, 1980.
     (Reliability No. 1.)

149. Telephone conversation.  Jerry Bevington, Wisconsin Department of Natural
     Resources to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  March 9, 1981.
     (Reliability No. 2.)

150. Telephone conversation and letter response.  Norman Glazer, City of
     Philadelphia Air Management to Sandy Beaton, GCA/Technology Division.
     November 1981.  (Reliability No. 2.)

151. Telephone conversation.  Robert King, City of Philadelphia Air Management
     to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  February 13, 1981.
     (Reliability No. 2.)
                                     178

-------
                                                                                    .O
                                                                                   O C
                                                                                   O H
                                                                                   « S5
                                                                                   w n
                                                                                   v^ a
                                                                                    H
                                                                                    a;
                                                                                    o
     MATERIAL IN THIS SECTION SUBJECT TO CONFIDENTIALITY

    REVIEW AND IS NOT RELEASABLE AS OF FEBRUARY  1,  1982.

   FOR INFORMATION, CONTACT L. KESARI, U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL

PROTECTION AGENCY, DIVISION OF STATIONARY SOURCE ENFORCEMENT.

-------
               TABLE  1.   ARMCO  INC./HAMILTON  PLANT  IN HAMILTON,  OH

              COKE  OVEN  QUENCHING  PROCESS  AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:

TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:

QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/1):c

QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):

QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

  TYPE OF BAFFLES:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. I1    No. 21    No. 31    No. 41

Koppers-Becker (all four batteries)2
1927a»3   19381     19411     19471
          1976b>4   1977b>4   1978b>4
1,930 (all four batteries combined)5
1,811 (all four batteries combined)5

No. 1 (serves all four batteries)4

Straight-through
Baffles7

Stainless steel7
19788
Baffles are "suppressor" type7
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery rebuilt 1961.1

^Involved end-flue rehabilitation.4

cQuench water is considered clean.2
                                      179

-------
                TABLE  2.   ARMCO  INC./HOUSTON WORKS  IN HOUSTON,  TX

              COKE  OVEN  QUENCHING  PROCESS  AND EMISSION CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:a
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:

TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:

QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/1):b

QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):

QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

  TYPE OF BAFFLES:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. I1
No. 21
Koppers-Becker^     Koppers-Becker^
19434               19531
19764               19774
1,045 (both batteries combined)5
840 (both batteries combined)5

No. 1 (serves both batteries)4

Rectangular9

TDS = 1,400 (rated)9



Baffles9

Wood9

• Baffles are arranged in 3 rows,
  inclined 45°, in alternating
  directions9
• Baffles located 1.75 m below top of
  tower9
• Tower measures 20.7 m high with
  outlet dimensions of 5.2 m x 14.2m9
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.4

^Quench water is considered clean.2
                                       180

-------
            TABLE 3.   ARMCO  INC./MIDDLETOWN WORKS  IN MIDDLETOWN, OH

     COKE PLANT NO.  2 COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:               No. I1

  MANUFACTURER:                    Wilputte1
  STARTUP DATE:                    19532>4
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:                  5,150 (Coke Plants No. 2 and 3 combined)5
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:                4,890 (Coke Plants No. 2 and 3 combined)5

QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:          No. I4

TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:              Carl Still offset9

QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):a      TDS =* 560,10 TSS = 32210

QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):        ~4,4509

QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM: Baffles9*10

  TYPE OF BAFFLES:                 Plastic9'10
  DATE INSTALLED:                  19766
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:              • Baffles located ~2.6 m from top of
                                     tower, and inclined at 45° angles9
                                   • A-frame baffle configuration9
                                   • Tower constructed of stainless steel;
                                     37.4 m high with cross-sectional area =
                                     54.7 sq m (at highest point)9'10


ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aQuench water is considered clean.2
                                       181

-------
             TABLE  4.   ARMCO  INC./MIDDLETOWN  WORKS  IN MIDDLETOWN,  OH

     COKE PLANT NO. 3 COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:

TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:

QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/1):a

QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):

QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

  TYPE OF BAFFLES:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. I1

Dravo-Still1
19761
No. 21

Dravo-Still1
19771
See previous page-*


No. 2 (serves both batteries)^

Round (tapered)9*10

TDS - 480,10 TSS - 15610

~5,1509

Baffles9'10

Stainless steel9'10
197410
• Baffles located 1.2 m from top of
  tower, and inclined at 20° angles
  (from vertical axis)9'10
• Baffles arranged in two opposing,
  horizontal rows9'10
• Baffles are 10 in. high, and on 4 in.
  centers10
• Tower constructed of brick; 30 m high
  with base diameter = 5.1 m; and top
  diameter = 4.3 m9'10
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aQuench water is considered clean.2
                                       182

-------
        TABLE 5.  BETHLEHEM STEEL CORP./BETHLEHEM PLANT IN BETHLEHEM, PA

              COKE  OVEN  QUENCHING  PROCESS  AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:

QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):b

QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):

QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

  TYPE OF BAFFLES:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
2A4
2B4
3B4
Koppers-Becker (all four batteries)2
19412    19412    19422    19422
5,840 (all six batteries combined)5
5,058 (all six batteries combined)5
No. 1 (serves
batteries 2A
and 2B)4
         No. 2 (serves
         batteries 3A
         and 3B)4
                                   (continued)
                                       183

-------
                               TABLE 5 (continued)

              COKE  OVEN  QUENCHING  PROCESS  AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:

QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):b

QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):

QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

  TYPE OF BAFFLES:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
.5*

Koppera-Becker^
1953a»2
A*

McKee-Otto^
19762
See previous page-*
No. 3  (serves
Battery No. 5)4
No. 4 (serves
Battery A)4
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery 5 rebuilt in 1977.1]-

bQuench water, for all four towers, is considered clean.
                                       184

-------
      TABLE 6.  BETHLEHEM STEEL CORP./BURNS HARBOR PLANT IN CHESTERTON, IN

              COKE  OVEN  QUENCHING  PROCESS  AND  EMISSION  CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
No. I1
Wilputte1
196912
1980^,13
1982b»13
No. 21
Koppers1
197212
COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:

TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:

QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):c

QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):

QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

  TYPE OF BAFFLES:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
6,670 (both batteries combined)5
5,179 (both batteries combined)5

No. 1 (serves both batteries)^

Straight-through13
Baffles13

Wood13
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

alnvolved changing steam nozzles, i.e., increasing aspiration, and rebuilding
 battery top.13

^Scheduled shut down for rebuild, i.e., double collector mains to be
 installed.13

cQuench water is dirty (recirculated); 53.9 percent of total quench water
 volume is process wastewater.2>l3>14
                                      185

-------
        TABLE 7.  BETHLEHEM STEEL CORP./JOHNSTOWN PLANT IN JOHNSTOWN, PA

              COKE  OVEN  QUENCHING  PROCESS  AND  EMISSION CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3»*>

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:

COKE PRODUCTION:0

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:

TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:

QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):d

QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):

QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

  TYPE OF BAFFLES:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No.
Koppers15*16
195115>16

19824»16
3,500 (for three battery operation)5
3,028 (for three battery operation)5
Straight-through17
Baffles17

Wood17
Mid-1960's17
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery No. 18 located in designated area known as the Franklin Plant.
 Battery Nos. 17 and 19 (total—151 ovens) also in the Franklin Plant, were
 shut down in 1977 due to a flood.^

^Johnstown facility also contained Battery Nos. 15 and 16 (total—88 ovens),
 designated as the Rosedale Plant, which were shut down in 1977 due to a
 flood.16

Production data shown for the Franklin Plant prior to the shut down of
 Battery Nos. 17 and 19.5»16

^Quench water is dirty (recirculated); 11.1 percent of total quench water
 volume is process wastewater.^*1^
                                       186

-------
       TABLE 8.  BETHLEHEM STEEL CORP./LACKAWANNA PLANT IN LACKAWANNA, NY

              COKE  OVEN  QUENCHING  PROCESS  AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATIONS

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:

COKE PRODUCTION:d

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
No. 718

Wilputte2
19522
No. 918
No. 818
Wilputte2    Wilputte2
19692        1961b»2

1982C»19
8,140 (for seven battery operation)-*
6,908 (for seven battery operation)^
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:

QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/1):e

QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpra):

QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:  Baffles19
North (serves batteries
No. 7 and 9)18

     Rectangular18
  TYPE OF BAFFLES:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
Wood19
-197519
• Tower outlet dimen-
  sions = 19 ft 10 in. x
  19 ft18
             Artie (serves
             Battery No. 8)18

             Rectangular18
             Baffles19

             Wood19
             -197519
             • Tower outlet
               dimensions «
               22 ft 5 in. x
               56 ft18
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBatteries No. 3, 4, 5 and 6 were shut down in 1977.19

^Battery was completely rebuilt in I960.19

cScheduled shut down for rebuild.19

•^Production data reflects operation of Batteries No. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8,
 and 9.5

eQuench water, for both towers, is dirty (recirculated).2
                                       187

-------
   TABLE 9.  BETHLEHEM STEEL CORP./SPARROWS POINT PLANT IN SPARROWS POINT, MD

              COKE  OVEN  QUENCHING  PROCESS  AND  EMISSION  CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
No. I4 No. 2A No. 34
Koppers (all four batteries)2
I9602 19612 19512
1985b,20 I985b>20 1982C,2!
No. 4 4
19782
1985t>»20
COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:

TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:

QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):d»e»f
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

  TYPE OF BAFFLES:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
5,500 (all eight batteries combined)21
No. 1 (serves         No. 2 (serves
batteries No. 1       batteries No. 3
and 2)20>22           and 4)20,22
Straight-through20    Straight-through20

TDS < 800 mg/1; TSS  <100 mg/1 (both
towers)20

695-785 (both towers)22
                                   (continued)
                                   188

-------
                               TABLE  9  (continued)

              COKE  OVEN  QUENCHING  PROCESS  AND  EMISSION  CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:

  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):d>e»f
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:^

  TYPE OF BAFFLES:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. 54     No. 64

See previous page2

19782      19532

1985b,20
                     No. II4    No. 124
Koppers-
 Becker2
19552
                                Koppers-
                                Becker2
                                19572
See previous page-*
No. 3 (serves
batteries No. 5
and 6)20>22

Straight-
through20
No. 6 (serves
batteries No. 11
and 12)22

Straight-
through20
TDS  <800 mg/1;20 TSS  <100 mg/1
(both towers)20
695-785 (tower
No. 3)22
1,017 (tower
No. 6)22
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery Nos. 9 and 10 were shut down in early 1981.21
t>New Battery "A" to startup in December 1981; will use Carl Still, diverted
 flow tower with baffles; new Battery "B" scheduled to startup in December
 1985 will replace Battery Nos. 1, 2, 4, and 5.
cPlant has the option to either shut down Battery Nos. 3 and 6 in 1982,
 or continue their operation until 1985.2^
^Industrial water used for quenching (all towers); salt water used for
 quenching in emergency cases (all towers).22'2-^
eQuench water is considered clean water (all towers).2
fQuench water make-up from out-fall of sewage treatment plant (all towers).20
STower No. 6 will have baffles by the end of 1981.20
                                        189

-------
             TABLE 10.  CF&I STEEL CORP./PUEBLO PLANT IN PUEBLO, CO

              COKE  OVEN  QUENCHING  PROCESS  AND  EMISSION  CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:

  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITAT
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:


TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:

QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):b

QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):

QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

  TYPE OF BAFFLES:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
ON DATE:
Koppers2
19 7 211
Koppers2
!9742,25
Koppers-
Becker2
I9602
1974a»2
South (serves Batteries   (North (serves
B and C)9>24              Battery D)24

Rectangular9*24           Round24

TDS~2,300 (for both towers)24

 3,080 (for both towers)9>24

       Baffles24          Baffles24

         Wood24           Wood24

• Both towers have similar baffle
  arrangements, i.e., single layer in
  one direction, angled at 45°2°
• Both towers had baffles repaired in
  198026
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation, and conversion from single to double
 collector mains.2

^Quench water, for both towers, is dirty (recirculated).2>24
                                       190

-------
TABLE 11.  FORD MOTOR CO./RIVER ROUGE PLANT IN DEARBORN, MI

   COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3

  MANUFACTURER:

  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:


TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:

QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):f


QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):

QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

  TYPE OF BAFFLES:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
                            Koppers-
                             Becker2
                            1937b,l
Wilputte1

197227
I979d,2
Koppers-
 Becker2
1937C>!
1979d,2
                             4,340  (all five batteries combined)5
                             3,945  (all five batteries combined)5

                             No.  I;* North28 (serves
                              batteries A, Ax, and B)

                             Rectangular28

                             Makeup water TDS =  111, and
                              recirculated water TDS = 156^9

                             815  (includes 225 gpm makeup water)28

                             Baffles28
                             •  Series  of  baffles with  spray
                               flushing28
                             •  Wood  tower measuring  142 ft high
                               with  outlet  cross-sectional
                               area  =  256 sq  ft28
                        (continued)
                             191

-------
                              TABLE  11  (continued)

              COKE  OVEN  QUENCHING  PROCESS  AND  EMISSION  CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:11

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:

QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/1):f


QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):

QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

  TYPE OF BAFFLES:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
Koppers-Becker2
1939e,l
1977d»2
Koppers-Becker2
19631
See previous
No. 2;4 South28 (serves
 batteries C and Dx)

Rectangular28

Makeup water TDS = 101, and
 recirculated water TDS =
867 (includes 298 gpm makeup water)28

Baffles28
• Series of baffles with spray
  flushing28
• Brick tower measuring 74 ft high
  with cross-sectional
  area = 867 sq ft28
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery D pushed empty in 1972.27

^Battery rebuilt In 1964; 16 ovens have been hot and empty since 1964.

cBattery rebuilt in 1962.*

^Involved end-flue rehabilitation.2

eBattery rebuilt in 1963.!

^Quench water, for both towers, is considered clean.2
                                         192

-------
       TABLE 12.   INLAND STEEL CO./INDIANA HARBOR WORKS IN E.  CHICAGO,  IN

     COKE PLANT NO.  2 COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:

QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):b

QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):

QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

  TYPE OF BAFFLES:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. 61
No. 71
Koppers-Becker1     Koppers-Becker1
19501               19561
197ia,2             1974a»2
6,170 (all five batteries combined)5
5,640 (all five batteries combined)5

No. I;30 No. 2^ (serves batteries
 No. 6 and 7)

Round9

Makeup water TDS <1,50031

5,0009

Baffles9

Wood9 >31
197030
• A-frame baffle configuration9
• Baffles located 1.2 m from top of
  tower, and inclined at 45° angles9
• Brick tower measuring 31.4 m high
  with outlet cross-sectional
  area =» 18.7 sq m9
                                   (continued)
                                          193

-------
                              TABLE  12  (continued)

     COKE PLANT NO. 2 COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:

QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):b


QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):

QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

  TYPE OF BAFFLES:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. 81
No. 91
No. 101
Koppers-Becker (all three batteries)1
19581
19591
19 701
See previous
No. 2;30 No. 34
 (serves batteries
 No. 8 and 9)
       Round9
             No. 3;30
              No. 44
              (serves
              battery
              No. 10)

             Round9
Makeup water TDS <1,500 (for each
 tower)31

5,000 (for each tower)9

       Baffles9           Baffles9

       Wood31             Wood31
       197^30             19743°
• Baffle and tower description
  (dimensions) same as tower serving
  batteries No. 6 and 7 (see previous
  page)9
       : .1 = s = r 3 .S :
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.
^Quench water, for all towers, is dirty (recirculated): 16.7 percent of
 total quench water volume is process wastewater.2>14>31
                                         194

-------
       TABLE 13.  INLAND STEEL CO./INDIANA HARBOR WORKS IN E. CHICAGO, IN
               COKE  PLANTS  NO.  3a  and  4b  COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS
                            AND EMISSION  CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:

  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:


QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:


TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:

QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):d


QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):

QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

  TYPE OF BAFFLES:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
Koppers1
19741
1979c,32
                   111
Koppers1
19781*32
3,014
 (battery C)5
2,740
 (battery C)5

No. 5 (serves
 battery

Round9
2,500
 (battery No. II)5
1,562
 (battery No. II)5

No. 6 (serves
 (battery No. II)4

Round9
Makeup water TDS  1,500 (for each
 tower)31
Baffles9
Baffles9
Redwood9*31        Wood31
197832             197432
• Both towers similar, as follows;9
  - Domed baffle configuration
  - Baffles are 1 in. x 4 in. blades,
    with 3.5 in. spacing between, and
    inclined 15° from vertical
  - Brick towers measuring 103 ft high
    with outlet cross-sectional
    area •= 531 sq ft
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery C.5

bBattery II.5

clnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2

•^Quench water, for both towers, is dirty (recirculated); 13.8 percent of
 total quench water volume is process wastewater.2»14»31
                                          195

-------
            TABLE 14.  INTERLAKE INC./RIVERDALE PLANT IN CHICAGO, IL

              COKE  OVEN  QUENCHING  PROCESS  AND  EMISSION  CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:

  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:

TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:

QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):b


QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):

QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

  TYPE OF BAFFLES:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. I1

Wilputte*
1956;33 195711
1979*>2
No. 21

Wilputte1
19571
1979a»2
1.850;1 1,7405 (both batteries
 combined)
1,460 (both batteries combined)^

No. 1 (serves both batteries)^
Quench water TDS = 837 (includes
 makeup water TDS = 218)34

10,000 gal/quench35

Grit Arrestors3^
• Mesh material covers top of the
       -if-                r
  tower-*0
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2

^Quench water is considered clean.2
                                      196

-------
    TABLE 15.  JONES & LAUGHLIN STEEL CORP./ALIQUIPPA WORKS IN ALIQUIPPA, PA

              COKE  OVEN  QUENCHING  PROCESS  AND  EMISSION  CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:

COKE PRODUCTION:0

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:

QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):f


QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):

QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

  TYPE OF BAFFLES:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
Koppers-Becker^
19451
197837
A-5b>1

Koppers^
19762,33
4,308 (both batteries combined)3?
3,500 (both batteries combined)38

No. 1 and No. 2 OR  No. 3 (serve both
 batteries)38

Rectangular^39     Round6>39

TDS -1,030 (can be  TDS ~7,500h>39
 up to 1,325)6.39
2,207-2,890S»39

Baffles39

Wood39
197137
• Baffles are 2 ft
  x 6 ft wooden
  louvers, in-
  clined 45°, and
  mounted on an
  A-frame with its
  base 12 ft from
  top of tower39
f Brick towers
  measuring 60 ft
  high, with outlet
  cross-sectional
  area = 1,071
  sq ft39
14,400h>39

Baffles39

Wood39
197137
• Baffles are 1 ft
  x 6 ft wood slats,
  inclined 45°, and
  located 10 ft from
  top of tower39
• LO-MO® quench
  process used*-'39
• Brick tower
  measuring 100 ft
  high
                                   (continued)
                                         197

-------
                              TABLE  15  (continued)

              COKE  OVEN  QUENCHING  PROCESS AND EMISSION  CONTROL DATA


ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBatteries A-3 and A-4 were shut down In 1980.37

bBattery A-5 replaced Battery A-2 in 1975-1976.38

cProduction data for a 4-battery operation (A-l, A-3, A-4, and A-5)  = 6,946
 (rated tpd), 4,506 (typical tpd).5

dTower internally divided into three equal sections (15 ft x 17 ft each).39

eTower is actually two stacks joined to a common hood;  base diameter of each
 stack - 21 ft, with outlet diameters of 16 ft and 19 ft.39

fQuench water, for all towers, is dirty (recirculated).^

SMakeup water consists of 100 gpm coke side shed scrubber wastewater and
 41 gpm of final cooler wastewater and service water.39

^Makeup water consists of 160 gpm lime-treated waste ammonia liquor  and
 service water.39

lLO-MO process—11 sec water application,  15 sec pause, and 29 sec water
 application.39
                                      198

-------
     TABLE 16.  JONES & LAUGHLIN STEEL CORP./CAMPBELL WORKS IN CAMPBELL, OH

              COKE  OVEN  QUENCHING  PROCESS  AND  EMISSION  CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:

COKE PRODUCTION^

  RATED TONS/DAY:

  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:


QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):c

QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):

QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

  TYPE OF BAFFLES:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. 71

Wilputte1
195433
No. 91

Wilputte1
195833
4.000;1 3,8165 (for three battery
 operation)
3,483 (for three battery operation)5
No. 4 (serves
 battery
 No. 7)59

Round
 (tapered)39

TDS » 14.00039

3.50039

Baffles39

Wood39
No. 5;39 No. 2*
 (serves battery
 No. 9)

Round
 (tapered)39

TDS - 14.00039

3.50039

Baffles39

Wood39
• Both towers similar, as follows;^*39
  - Baffles installed at top of tower
    (act as tower extension) in four
    rows, and inclined at 45°
  - Brick towers measuring 101 ft high,
    with base diameter = 18 ft, and
    top diameter = 14 ft
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery No. 8 shut down June 5, 1980.40

^Production data reflect operation of battery Nos. 7, 8, and

cQuench water, for both towers, is dirty (recirculated).2

^Except, tower No. 5 is 7 ft shorter than No. 4.39
                                         199

-------
          TABLE 17.  JONES & LAUGHLIN STEEL CORP./INDIANA HARBOR WORKS
                     IN E. CHICAGO, IN

              COKE  OVEN QUENCHING  PROCESS  AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:8

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:

COKE PRODUCTION:c

  RATED TONS/DAY:

  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:


TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:

QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/1):d



QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):

QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

  TYPE OF BAFFLES:

  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. 41

Kopper
195634,41
                    No. 91
Koppers-Becker2     Koppers-Becker2
ioc:/:34.41           1961^>42
                    I979b»2
4,050;! 4.0005 (for three battery
 operation)
3,406 (for three battery operation)^

No. 4 (serves       No. 9 (serves
 battery No. 4)43    battery No. 9)43
Round42

Makeup water
 TDS - 537 (for
 tower No. 4)43
Baffles42
Brick and
 concrete42
195242
• Baffles are
  impingement
                               ,42
                    Rectangular'
                    Makeup water
                     TDS - 449 (for
                     tower No. 9)43
                    Baffles42

                    Brick and
                     concrete42
                    196142
                    • Baffles are
                      impingement
                      type^
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery No. 3 permanently shut down.42

^Involved end-flue rehabilitation.2»42

cProduction data reflect operation of battery Nos. 3, 4, and

^Quench water, for both towers, is considered clean.2
                                        200

-------
      TABLE 18.  JONES & LAUGHLIN CORP./PITTSBURGH WORKS IN PITTSBURGH, PA

              COKE  OVEN  QUENCHING PROCESS  AND EMISSION  CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:

TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:

QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):b

QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):

QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

  TYPE OF BAFFLES:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
Wilputte1
19 601
197944
P21

Wilputte1
19 611
1977a»2
P3N1

Wilputte1
19611
1980a>44
5,300 (all five batteries combined)5
5,230 (all five batteries combined)5

No. 1 (serves all three batteries)4

Rectangular9



~600 gal/ton coke44

Baffles9

Wood9

• One horizontal row of baffles located
  approximately 2.3 m from top of
  tower9
• Baffle blades inclined A5°9
• Wooden tower measuring 18.3 m high
  with outlet cross-sectional area =
  107 sq m9
                                   (continued)
                                   201

-------
                              TABLE 18 (continued)

              COKE  OVEN  QUENCHING  PROCESS  AND  EMISSION CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:

TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:

QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/1):b

QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):

QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

  TYPE OF BAFFLES:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
P3S1

Wilputte1
19611
1978a>2
Koppers-Becker2
19531
1977a>2
See previous page-*


No. 4  (serves both batteries)*

Rectangular"



~600 gal/ton coke**

Baffles9

Wood9

• A-frame baffle configuration located
  approximately 2.5 m from top of
  tower9
• Baffle blades inclined 45 °9
• Wooden tower measuring 30.5 m high,
  with outlet cross-sectional area **
  20.9 sq m9
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2

^Quench water, for both towers, is considered clean.2***
                                      202

-------
                  TABLE 19.  KAISER STEEL CORP. IN FONTANA, CA

              COKE  OVEN QUENCHING  PROCESS  AND  EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:a
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:

  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:

TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:

QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/1):d

QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):

QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

  TYPE OF BAFFLES:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
Koppers-Becker (all three batteries)^
194245      194245      1949*5
19732       197345      197645
4,250;! 4,1005 (all seven batteries
 combined)
3,800 (all seven batteries combined)5
No. 1 (serves all three

Straight-through47
Baffles47*48

Wood; 47 redwood48
                                   (continued)
                                      203

-------
                              TABLE 19 (continued)

              COKE  OVEN  QUENCHING  PROCESS  AND  EMISSION  CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:

  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:

TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:

QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):d

QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):

QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

  TYPE OF BAFFLES:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
Koppers-Becker (all three batteries)^
194945       195245      195245
1976a,45     !979_       1978b»45
              1980b,45
See previous


No. 2 (serves all three batteries)c>46

Straight-through47
Baffles47*48

Wood;47 redwood48
                                   (continued)
                                     204

-------
                              TABLE 19 (continued)

              COKE  OVEN  QUENCHING  PROCESS  AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:

TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:

QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/1):d

QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):

QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

  TYPE OF BAFFLES:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
Fl
Koppers-Becker^     Koppers-Becker^
195845              195845
See previous page-"->5


No. 3 (serves both batteries)4^

Straight-through47
Baffles47>48

Wood;47 redwood48
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

alnvolved trim work.45

blnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2>45

cBattery C is served by either quench tower No. 1 or No. 2.4&

^Quench water, for all towers, is dirty (recirculated); 43.8 percent of
 total quench water volume is process wastewater.^»l4
                                      205

-------
                   TABLE  20.  LONE  STAR  STEEL  IN LONE  STAR, TX

              COKE  OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND  EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3                         C4

  MANUFACTURER:                               Koppers2
  STARTUP DATE:                               197911
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:

COKE PRODUCTION:b

  RATED TONS/DAY:                             1,214s
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:                           6905

QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:                     No. I1

TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:                         Straight-through

QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):c»d

QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):

QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:            Baffles49

  TYPE OF BAFFLES:                            Wood49
  DATE INSTALLED:                             197949
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:


ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBatteries A and B (total—78 ovens) were shut down in 1979.49

^Production data appears to be for the old batteries.^

cQuench water is considered clean.2

^Quench water is recirculated.49
                                     206

-------
    TABLE 21.  NATIONAL STEEL CORP./GREAT LAKES STEEL DIVISION IN ECORSE, MI

     COKE PLANT NO. 2 COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:

QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/1):c
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:d

  TYPE OF BAFFLES:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. 31

Wilputte1'50
19542>50

1982b>52
No. 41

Wilputte1*50
19562»50

1974a,51
2,500 (both batteries combined)5
2,500 (both batteries combined)5
No. 3 (serves
 battery No. 3)50

Round50
No. 4 (serves
 battery No. 4)50

Rectangular50
Make-up water TDS   Make-up water TDS
= 221, and recircu- 108, and recircu-
lated water TDS =   lated water TDS =
221 (for tower      179 (for tower
No. 3)53            No. 4)53
8,300 gals/hour
(for tower
No. 3)50
9,330 gals/hour
(for tower
No. 4)50
• Brick tower
  measuring 105 ft
  high, with out-
  let diameter =
  11 ft50
• Wood tower
  measuring 72 ft
  high, with out-
  let cross-
  sectional area =
  256 sq ft50
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.5^

bScheduled shut down for rebuild, with startup in 1985.52

cQuench water, for both towers, is dirty (recirculated).2>50

^Baffles, in both towers, to be installed in future (no baffles presently
 within either tower).50
                                        207

-------
    TABLE 22.  NATIONAL STEEL CORP./GREAT LAKES STEEL DIVISION IN ECORSE, MI

     COKE PLANT NO. 3 COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:

TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:

QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/1):a


QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):

QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:b

  TYPE OF BAFFLES:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. 51

Otto1>50
19701.2
3,412:50 2,900s
2,700s

No. 550

Rectangular^O

Make-up water TDS = 221, and
recirculated water TDS = 27053

17,800 gals/hour50
• Wood tower measuring 86 ft high
  with outlet cross-sectional area
  = 1,386 sq ft50
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aQuench water is dirty (recirculated).2»50

^Baffles to be installed in future (no baffles presently in tower).50
                                   208

-------
          TABLE 23.  NATIONAL STEEL CORP./GRANITE CITY STEEL DIVISION
                     IN GRANITE CITY, IL

              COKE  OVEN QUENCHING  PROCESS AND EMISSION  CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATIONS

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:

TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:

QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):c

QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):

QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

  TYPE OF BAFFLES:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
Ab,54

McKee-Otto54
I96054
760-85354

No. I4

Rectangular-'-'

Make-up water TDS - 450-75734



Baffles55>56

Wood55
197756
• Single row of baffles with 3-inch
  gap between each row55
• Tower measures 52 ft high, with
  outlet cross-sectional area «
  1,056 sq ft55
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aPlant formerly operated batteries B and C which contained 49 and 61 ovens,
 respectively.  These batteries are currently being rebuilt similar to battery
 A and will contain 45 and 47 ovens, respectively.54
      battery replaced a similar type Koppers-Becker battery containing
 27 ovens.54

cQuench water is dirty (recirculated); 7.1 percent of total quench water
 volume is process wastewater.^*!4
                                      209

-------
      TABLE 24.   NATIONAL STEEL CORP./WEIRTON STEEL DIVISION IN WEIRTON,  WV

              COKE  OVEN  QUENCHING  PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3

  MANUFACTURER:

  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:

  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:


QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:


QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/1):

QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

  TYPE OF BAFFLES:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
M-71

Koppers-
 Becker^
19511

198258
M-81

Koppers-
 Becker^
195347
1979b>57
4,500 (for four battery
 operation)d>5
4,066 (for four battery
 operation)4*»5
No. 2
(serves
battery
M-7)4

Rectangu-
Iar57,l8

  f,g
No. 3
(serves
battery
M-8)4

Rectangu-
Iar59

  f,g

~5,40057
Koppersl

19 7 31
1979C»2
              3,600  (battery
               1-1)5
              3,000  (battery
               1-1)5
   g,h

18,000-20,000
gal/quench (for
open area
quenching)6»5'
            Baffles57,58,59

            Wood57,58,59
            1978;57 197958
            • Baffles are
              water-^wash type^'
            • Test Data
              (1980);JT59
              Tower west
               side: 270,762-
               307,942 acfm
               (wet) at 132-
               159°F (range)
                                   (continued)
                                      210

-------
                              TABLE 24 (continued)

              COKE  OVEN  QUENCHING  PROCESS  AND  EMISSION  CONTROL DATA
                                                     Tower east
                                                      side: 244,127-
                                                      229,034 acfm
                                                      (wet)a 134-
                                                      140°F (range)
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBatteries M-5 and M-6 (total of 106 ovens) were shut down in September-
 October 1980.57,58

^Involved end-wall rehabilitation.57

clnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2

^Production data for the "mainland" reflects a four battery operation
 (M-5, M-6, M-7, and M-8).5»58

eTwo systems used:  (1) Continuous Wet Quench (CWQ) or, (2) Conventional
 batch wet quench (no tower or baffles), process done in open area.->7>60

fQuench water is dirty (recirculated) water; 22.1 percent of total quench
 water volume is from process wastewater.2,14

SOhio River water used for make-up water.57

^Quench water is considered clean.^

iNo baffles within tower No. 2.57,58

J1980 testing of Tower No. 3 occurred when; (1) just-pushed coke was
 quenched, and (2) coke partially quenched by PECT hood was further
 quenched.59
                                   211

-------
      TABLE  25.   REPUBLIC  STEEL  CORP./SOUTHERN  STEEL  DISTRICT,  THOMAS WORKS
                IN BIRMINGHAM, AL

              COKE  OVEN  QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION  CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:

TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:

QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):c»d

QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):

QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

  TYPE OF BAFFLES:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. I1

Koppers1
19418*1
1981b,61
1,066;5 9501
5605

No. I4

Rectangular61
Baffles61

Wood62

• Baffles arranged laterally61
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery was rebuilt in 1969.2

^Involved end-flue rehabilitation.61

cQuench water is considered clean.2

^Quench, water is recirculated.62
                                      212

-------
         TABLE  26.   REPUBLIC  STEEL  CORP./CHICAGO  DISTRICT  IN CHICAGO,  IL

             COKE  OVEN  QUENCHING PROCESS  AND  EMISSION CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:b

TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:

QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):c

QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):

QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

  TYPE OF BAFFLES:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. I1

Wilputte63
194311,63

1981a,63
1,369;3 1.20063
1,3005

No. I4
Baffles64

Wood64
197164
• Baffles are slat type64
• Tower is constructed of wood36
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBattery No. 1 will be replaced (late 1981) by Battery No. 2 (containing
 60 ovens, 6 m high, double collector mains, 4 charge holes, automatic lid
 lifters, using stage charging and rated at 1,800 tons of coke per day.63>64
      tower to be replaced (late 1981) by a new quench tower with baffled
 mist suppression and clean make-up water.64

cQuench water is considered clean. 2
                                      213

-------
       TABLE  27.   REPUBLIC  STEEL  CORP./CLEVELAND  DISTRICT  IN  CLEVELAND,  OH

     COKE PLANT NO. 1 COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:b
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:

TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:

QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):c>d

QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):

QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

  TYPE OF BAFFLES:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. I1     No. 21     No. 31     No. 41

Koppers (all four batteries)^-
197611     19582      19582      19582
           19722      19722      19722
  2,782 (all four batteries combined)5
  2,049 (all four batteries combined)5

Nos. 1 and 2 (serve battery Nos. 1-4)65

Rectangular (both towers)65*66

Total dissolved solids = 833 (both towers)65



Baffles (both towers)66

Wood (both towers)66

• Both towers are constructed of wood65
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery No. 5 was shut down In 1975. 65

^Included end-flue rehabilitation.2

cBoth towers use dirty (recirculated) quench water.2
       Nos. 1 and 2 use 62.1% process wastewater of the total quench water
 volume. 1^
                                      214

-------
       TABLE  28.   REPUBLIC  STEEL  CORP./CLEVELAND DISTRICT IN CLEVELAND,  OH

     COKE PLANT NO. 2 COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:b
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:

TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:

QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):c

QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):

QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

  TYPE OF BAFFLES:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. 61

Koppers-Becker
195233
19792
No. 71

Koppers-Beckerl
195233
19792
1,954 (both batteries combined)5
1,286 (both batteries combined)5

No. A (serves both batteries)65

Round65*66
• Tower constructed of brick65
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery No. 5 was shut down in 1975.65

^Included end-flue rehabilitation.2

cTower No. 4 uses dirty (recirculated) quench water, with 28.3% process
 wastewater in the total quench water volume.2»-^
                                      215

-------
       TABLE 29.  REPUBLIC STEEL CORP./SOUTHERN DISTRICT, GULFSTEEL WORKS
                    IN GADSDEN, AL

             COKE OVEN QUENCHING  PROCESS  AND  EMISSION  CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:

  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:

TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:

QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):b

QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):

QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

  TYPE OF BAFFLES:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. 21

Wilputte67
194267
1973a>2
No. 31

Wilputte67
1960&7
2,372;5 1.4001 (both batteries
 combined)
1,785 (both batteries combined)5

No. 1 (serves both batteries)^

Rectangular67
Baffles67

Wood (treated)67
197367
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2

^Quench water is considered clean water.2>67
                                      216

-------
     TABLE  30.  REPUBLIC  STEEL  CORP./CENTRAL  ALLOY  DISTRICT  IN MASSILLON,  OH

              COKE  OVEN QUENCHING  PROCESS  AND EMISSION  CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:

TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:

QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):a

QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):

QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

  TYPE OF BAFFLES:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. I1

Koppers^
19551

198211
576:5 5001
500$

No. I4

Straight-through68
Baffles68

Wood68
197569
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aQuench water is considered clean water.2,68
                                      217

-------
     TABLE 31.  REPUBLIC STEEL CORP./MAHONING VALLEY DISTRICT IN WARREN, OH

              COKE  OVEN  QUENCHING  PROCESS  AND  EMISSION  CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:a

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:

TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:

QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):b»c

QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):

QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

  TYPE OF BAFFLES:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. 41

Koppers70
19792
No. 44

Straight-through40



264,000 gpd7

Baffles40

Wood40
197940
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBatteries No. 1 and 2 were shut down in March 1979.40

^Quench water is dirty (recirculated) water.2,40

C16.3% of total quench water volume is process wastewater.^-4
                                      218

-------
   TABLE 32.  REPUBLIC STEEL CORP./MAHONING VALLEY DISTRICT IN YOUNGSTOWN, OH

              COKE  OVEN  QUENCHING  PROCESS AND  EMISSION CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:

  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:


TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:


QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):c

QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):

QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

  TYPE OF BAFFLES:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
                                                   Koppersl    Koppersl
                                                   19501       1950*>1
Al

Koppersl
195Q1

i982b.ll
                                       2.970;5 2.6041 (all three batteries
                                        combined)4
                                       2,735 (all three batteries combined)5
                                       No. 1 (serves
                                       batteries A and B)

                                       Straight-through*0
                                       Baffles

                                       Wood40
                                       197071
                                              40
                        No. 2 (serves
                        battery C)4

                        Straight-
                        through40
                        Baffles40

                        Wood40
                        197071
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery rebuilt in 1962.2

"Scheduled shut down by Federal Consent Decree.H>4°

cQuench water, in both towers, is dirty (recirculated): 11.1 percent of
 total quench water volume is process wastewater.2>14>40
                                      219

-------
       TABLE  33.   UNITED  STATES  STEEL  CORP./CLAIRTON WORKS  IN  CLAIRTON,  PA

              COKE OVEN QUENCHING  PROCESS  AND  EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:

TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:

QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/1):a

QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):

QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

  TYPE OF BAFFLES:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. 1
                                            72
No. 272
No. 372
Wilputte2    Wilputte2    Wilputte2
195572       195572       195572
1979?2       197972       197972
20,780 (entire coke plant)5
16,342 (entire coke plant)5

No. 1 (serves all three batteries)^

Rectangular9



 I9609

Baffles9

Redwood9

• Single tier baffles, inclined 34°,
  located at 6 m height9
• Each baffle is 1.9 cm x 15 cm (4.1 cm
  spacing)9
• LO-MO® Quench method used9
• Wood tower measuring 30.5 m high, with
  outlet cross-sectional area = 21.1
  sq m9
                                   (continued)
                                      220

-------
                              TABLE 33 (continued)

              COKE  OVEN  QUENCHING  PROCESS  AND  EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
No. 772
Koppers2
195472
No. 872
Koppers2
195472
No. 972
Koppers2
195472
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:

TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:

QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/1):a

QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):

QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

  TYPE OF BAFFLES:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
19844
19844
1984*
See previous page-*
No. 3 (serves all three batteries)^
                                   (continued)
                                      221

-------
                              TABLE 33 (continued)

              COKE  OVEN  QUENCHING  PROCESS  AND  EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:


QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/1):a

QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):

QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

  TYPE OF BAFFLES:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. 1572     No. 1672     No. 1772

Koppers2     Wilputte2    Wilputte2
1953b>2      195072       195072

             19824        19824
See previous pages-*
No. 5        No. 6 (serves batteries
(serves      No. 16 and 17)4
battery No.
15)4
Carl Still offset44
Baffles44

Plastic44
197944
Straight-
through44
Baffles44

Wood44
                                   (continued)
                                      222

-------
                              TABLE 33 (continued)

              COKE  OVEN  QUENCHING  PROCESS  AND  EMISSION  CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:

QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):a

QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):

QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

  TYPE OF BAFFLES:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. 1972   No. 2072   No. 2172   No. 2272

Koppers-Becker (all four batteries)2
195172     1947C»72   194772     194672
197772                1972d>4    1973e»4
See previous pages-*
No. 7 (serves
batteries No. 19
and 20)4
No. 8 (serves
batteries No. 21
and 22)4
Carl-Still offset44   Straight-through44
Baffles44

Plastic44
197944
Baffles44

Wood44
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aQuench water, for all towers, is considered clean.2

bBattery rebuilt in 1979.2

cBattery rebuilt in 1978.72

dInvolved end-flue rehabilitation.4

elnvolved rehabilitation from bench up.72
                                       223

-------
      TABLE  34.   UNITED  STATES  STEEL  CORP./FAIRFIELD WORKS  IN FAIRFIELD,  AL

              COKE  OVEN  QUENCHING  PROCESS AND  EMISSION  CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:8

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:


  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:


TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:


QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):d»e

QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):

QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

  TYPE OF BAFFLES:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. 273

U.S. Steel/Still2
197873
                      No. 973

                      Koppers-Becker2
                      195833
                      1974b,74
                         c
6,866 (appears to be for five battery
 operation, i.e., Nos. 2, 5, 6, 7,
 and 9)5
5,930 (appears to be for five battery
 operation, i.e., Nos. 2, 5, 6, 7,
 and 9)5
No. 2 (serves
battery No. 2)4>61

Carl Still
offset9'61
                      No. 9 (serves
                      battery No.
                      Rectangular
                                 61
TDS < 0.5; TSS  < 0.0261

~10,0459
Baffles9'61

Plastic;9 Wood61
197861
• A-frame baffle
  configuration9
• Baffles are
  inclined 45°9
• Wooden tower
  measuring 37.1 m
  high, with outlet
  cross-sectional
  area = 61.9 sq m9
                      Baffles61'62

                      Wood61'62
                      197761
                      • Lateral configura-
                        tion61
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 were shut down in 1977, 1977, 1980, 1980,
 1979, and 1978, respectively.61'73
bBattery No. 9 was rebuilt in 1979.73
cBattery No. 9 has been idling hot since August 1980.61
^Quench water, for both towers, is considered clean.2
eQuench water, for both towers, is recirculated.62
                                        224

-------
    TABLE 35.   UNITED  STATES  STEEL  CORP./FAIRLESS WORKS  IN  FAIRLESS  HILLS,  PA

              COKE  OVEN  QUENCHING PROCESS AND  EMISSION CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:

TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:

QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):b»c

QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):

QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:d

  TYPE OF BAFFLES:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. I1

Wilputte1
19522
1978a>2
No. 21

Wilputte1
19532
1978*»2
3,000 (both batteries combined)5
3,000 (both batteries combined)5

No. 1 (serves both batteries)^

Round7 5
ll.OOO75
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2

^Quench water is dirty (recirculated) water; 10.3 percent of total quench
 water volume is process wastewater.2*-^

cQuench water is from the Delaware River.75

^Tower has no baffles.75
                                      225

-------
           TABLE  36.  UNITED STATES STEEL CORP./GARY WORKS  IN GARY,  IN

              COKE  OVEN  QUENCHING  PROCESS AND EMISSION  CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:8
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
No. I76
Koppers-
Becker2
19702
1979b»2
No. 276
U.S. Steel/
Still2
19752
No. 376
U.S. Steel/
Still2
19762
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:
11,960 (all eight batteries combined)5
9,750 (all eight batteries combined)5

No. 1 (serves   No. 2 (serves  No. 3 (serves
battery         battery        battery
No. I)"76        No. 2)76       No. 3)'6
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/1):
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):
                           .c
Rectangu-
lar76

Make-up water
TDS <1,90477

100,000 gals/
hr (includes
18,650 gals/
hr make-up
water)78
                Carl Still
                offset42.76
Carl Still
offset42.76
                Make-up water  Make-up water
                TDS <1,62777   TDS <1,62777
                68,500 gals/
                hr (includes
                14,050 gals/
                hr make-up
                water)78
76,000 gals/
hr (includes
14,750 gals/
hr make-up
water)78
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:  Baffles42.76    Baffles42.76   Baffles42.76
TYPE OF BAFFLES:
DATE INSTALLED:
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:






Wood^./o
197079
• Baffles are
impingement
type ; wood
louvered, and
angled76
• Wood tower
(concrete,
Plastic
(PVCi76
197579
• Baffles are
impingement
type; in-
stalled in
triangular
configura-
tion76
Plastic
(PVCi76
1§767$
• Baffles are
impingement
type; in-
stalled in
triangular
configura-
tion76
                                    (continued)
                                         226

-------
                TABLE 36  (continued)

COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
                       base)         • Wood/brick   • Wood/Brick
                       measuring       tower          tower
                       90 ft high,     measuring      measuring
                       with outlet     107.8 ft       107 ft high,
                       dimensions      high, with     with outlet
                       = 24.9 ft x     outlet         dimensions =•
                       71.3 ft76       dimensions =   22.9 ft x
                                       22.9 ft x      25.8 ft76
                                       24.8 ft76
                     (continued)
                     227

-------
                              TABLE 36 (continued)

              COKE OVEN  QUENCHING  PROCESS AND EMISSION  CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
No. 511
Wilputte2
19542
19884
No. 711
Wilputte2
195479
1978b»2
19884
COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:

TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:

QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/1):c

QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):


QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

  TYPE OF BAFFLES:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
See previous pages^


No. 5 (serves both batteries)'"

Rectangular76

Make-up water TDS 
-------
                              TABLE 36 (continued)

              COKE OVEN QUENCHING  PROCESS AND EMISSION  CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATIONS
MANUFACTURER:

STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
No. 13 76
Koppers-
Becker2
19 512
1974b»2
19874
No. 1576
Wilputte2

19 512
1977b>2

No. 1676
Wilputte2

19492
1975b»2
19874
COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:

QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):^


QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):
QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

  TYPE OF BAFFLES:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
                                     See previous pages-*
                                     No. 8 (serves batteries
                                     No. 13 and 15)76
                                                76
                                     Rectangular
                                     Make-up water
                                     TDS <1,90477

                                     173,000 gals/hr
                                     (includes 6,150 gals/hr
                                     make-up water)7**
                                     Baffles42*76

                                     Wood42'76
                                     • Baffles are impinge-
                                       ment type; wood,
                                       louvered, and
                                       angled76
                                     • Brick tower measuring
                                       94.8 ft high, with
                                       outlet dimensions
                                       = 17 ft x 45 ft76
No. 9 (serves
battery
No. 16)76
                                                                          76
Rectangular
Make-up water
TDS <1,90477

60,500 gals/hr
(includes 6,150
gals/hr make-up
water)78

Baffles42'76

Wood42*76
194979
• Baffles are
  impingement
  type; wood,
  louvered, and
  angled76
• Brick tower
  measuring 94.8
  ft high, with
  outlet dimen-
  sions = 17 ft
  x 45.3 ft76
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
aBatteries No. 9 and 11 pushed empty in 1971, Batteries No. 10, 12 and 14
 pushed empty in 1975.7^
^Involved end-flue rehabilitation.2
CA11 towers use quench water that is dirty (recirculated); quench water
 contains 7.6 percent process wastewater.14
                                         229

-------
   TABLE  37.  UNITED STATES STEEL CORP./LORAIN—CUYAHOGA WORKS  IN  LORAIN, OH

              COKE OVEN  QUENCHING PROCESS  AND  EMISSION  CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:3
Dll
Koppers-
Becker2
19572
Gil
Koppers-
Becker2
19562
19772
Hll
Koppers-
Becker2
I95533
19782
111
Wilputte2
19552
19792
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:b

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:

QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):c»d

QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):

QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

  TYPE OF BAFFLES:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
                                    198280
                                    4,468 (all seven batteries combined)-*
                                    4,319 (all seven batteries combined)^
                                    No. 5
                                    (serves
                                    battery
Nos. 1 and 2 (serve
batteries G, H and I)81
                                               Round39



                                               4,50039

                                               Baffles39*SI

                                               Wood8!

                                               • Baffles are 2-ft x 10-ft
                                                 boards, inclined 45°9>39
                                               • LO-MO® quench process used
                                               • Brick tower, with 15-ft inside
                                                 diameter at top and 120-ft
                                                 tall39
                                   (continued)
                                      230

-------
                              TABLE 37 (continued)

             COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:a
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:b
JH
Wilputte2
19472
19702
Kll
Wilputte2
19472
19702
198280
Lll
Wilputte2
19472
19702
198280
COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:

QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):c»d

QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):

QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

  TYPE OF BAFFLES:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
See previous page-*
Nos 3 and 4 (serve batteries J, K,
and L)81
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

alncluded end-flue rehabilitation.2

^Batteries, D, K and L are scheduled to be shut down in 1982, but have
 applied for stretch out until 1985.52

CA11 towers use quench water that is dirty (recirculated) water.2

     towers use quench water that contains 72.8% process wastewater.^
                                    231

-------
         TABLE 38.  UNITED STATES STEEL CORP./GENEVA WORKS IN PROVO, UT

              COKE OVEN  QUENCHING  PROCESS  AND EMISSION  CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:

  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:

  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:



TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:

QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):b

QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):

QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

  TYPE OF BAFFLES:
  DATE INSTALLED:0
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
          No. 41

            four
No. I1    No. 21    No. 31
Koppers;2 Koppers-Becker82
 batteries)
1944; 2 19501 (all four batteries)
1979*>2   1979a>2
5.000;1 3,5585 (all four batteries
 combined)
3,520 (all four batteries combined)5
South (serves
batteries No. 1
and 2)83
North (serves
batteries No. 3
and 4)83
Round83             Round83

TDS = 7,000-8,000 (for both towers)8^

4,000 gals/quench (for both towers)82

Baffles83           Baffles83

Tar impregnated redwood (both towers)83
197783              197783
• Baffles arranged similarly within both
  towers as follows:83
   Center section—single row, 3/4 in. x
   7 in. x 5 ft 5 in., spaced on 9 in.
   centers, and approximately 60% open
   area
   Side sections (2)—single row, 3/4 in.
   x 7 in. at 45  angles, spaced on 10 in.
   centers, and approximately 40% open
   area
• Both towers are constructed of brick83
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2

^Quench water, for both towers, is dirty (recirculated) with 70.7 percent
 of total quench volume from process wastewater.2'^

cBaffles originally installed in 1977; modified in 1978 and 1979 with
 replacement occurring approximately every 6 to 7 months.83
                                        232

-------
   TABLE  39.  WHEELING-PITTSBURGH  STEEL  CORP./MON  VALLEY  PLANT  IN MONESSEN,  PA

             COKE  OVEN  QUENCHING  PROCESS  AND  EMISSION  CONTROL  DATA
Koppers-Becker^
1942a,b,l
BATTERY DESIGNATION:                   No.

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:

COKE PRODUCTION:d

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:

TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:

QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):e»f

QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):

QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:     Baffles86

  TYPE OF BAFFLES:                     Wood86
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. 24

Koppers-Becker^
1,836 (both batteries combined)5
1,332 (both batteries combined)5

No. 1 (serves both batteries)4

Rectangular85
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery No. 1 was rebuilt in 1981.85

^Battery No. 1 originally had 74 ovens; 37 ovens were rebuilt in 1981 which
 included conversion from a 3-hole, single collector main to a 4-hole double
 collector main battery.  The remaining 37 ovens are being converted to a
 4-hole, double collector main battery.85

cBattery No. 2 was rebuilt in 1979, which included conversion from a 3-hole,
 single collector main to a 4-hole, double collector main battery.2,85

^Production data reflects the original two battery (93 oven) operation.5

eQuench water is considered clean water.2>86

fQuench water is recycled river water.85
                                      233

-------
         TABLE 40.  WHEELING-PITTSBURGH STEEL CORP./STEUBENVILLE PLANT
                    IN EAST STEUBENVILLE,  WV

              COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
No. I11
Koppers2
1917b»87
1978e>2
No. 211
Koppers2
1917c,87
1978e>2
No. 311
Koppers-
Becker2
1917^,87
1978e, 2
No. 811
Koppers2
197687
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:

  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
4.400;1 5,205s  (all four batteries
 combined)
4,310  (all four batteries combined)5

No. 1  or No. 2  (serves           No. 3
batteries No. 1, 2, and 3)4>87   (serves
                                 battery
                                 No. 8)4»87
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:


QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):f»S

QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):

QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

  TYPE OF BAFFLES:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
Straight-through87




~55387

Baffles87

Wood87
198087
• Quench towers were rebuilt
  in 1980 with baffles; no
  baffles were used prior to
  I96087
Straight-
through87
-55387

Baffles87

Wood87
197687
• Baffles
  arranged
  at 45°
  angles87
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aPlant shut down Battery No. 4 (53 ovens) in 1977,  Battery No.  5 (53 ovens)
 in 1976, and Battery No. 6 (63 ovens) in 1977.87
bBattery rebuilt in 1955.2>87
cBattery rebuilt in 1953.2»87
dBattery rebuilt in 1964.2»87
elnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2
^All quench towers use water that is considered clean.2
8A11 quench towers use Ohio River water and recirculated water for
 quenching.87

                                         234

-------
     MATERIAL IN THIS SECTION SUBJECT TO CONFIDENTIALITY                             o
    REVIEW AND IS NOT RELEASABLE AS OF FEBRUARY 1, 1982.                          Qw
   FOR INFORMATION, CONTACT L. KESARI, U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL                         |o
PROTECTION AGENCY, DIVISION OF STATIONARY SOURCE ENFORCEMENT.                     o|
                                                                                    jn
                                                                                  o
                                                                                  o
                                                                                   K O

-------
      TABLE  1.   ALABAMA  BY-PRODUCTS  CORP./TARRANT  COKE  PLANT  IN TARRANT,  AL

              COKE  OVEN  QUENCHING  PROCESS  AND  EMISSION  CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3

  MANUFACTURER:

  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:

TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:

QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):b

QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):

QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

  TYPE OF BAFFLES:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
  No. 52

  Koppers-
   Becker61
  19412»61
  198061
No. 62

Koppers-
 Becker61
1941&1
198061
  2,400 (for a four battery operation)^
  2,100 (for a four battery operation)^

  No. 2 (serves batteries No. 5 and 6)61

  Rectangular^»61



  1.7609

  Baffles9>62

  Wood9*62

  • Conventional spray system9
  • One horizontal row of baffles
    inclined 45°9
  • Brick tower;height = 17.1 m; outlet
    cross-sectional area = 76.6 sq. m
    ,. _ . i ii • L 'J

(continued)
                                   235

-------
                               TABLE  1  (continued)

              COKE  OVEN  QUENCHING  PROCESS AND EMISSION  CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:

TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:

QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):b

QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):

QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

  TYPE OF BAFFLES:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. I;2 A61

Wilputte61
19682'61
197961
See previous


No. 1 (serves battery No.

Rectangular9 > 6^



2,2109

Baffles9.62

Wood9'62
Conventional spray system9
• One horizontal row of baffles
  inclined 45°9
• Stainless steel tower; height =
  54.5 m; outlet cross-sectional
  area = 56.4 sq. m9
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery No. 2 was permanently shut down in Aug. 1979.6^

^Quench water is dirty (recirculated);2>62 11.1% of total quench volume is
 process wastewater.^
                                     236

-------
          TABLE 2.  ALLIED CHEMICAL CORP./ASHLAND PLANT IN ASHLAND, KY

              COKE OVEN  QUENCHING  PROCESS AND  EMISSION  CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:

QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):d>e

QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):

QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

  TYPE OF BAFFLES:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. 32

Wllputte2
19532
1973C>2
                       No. 4a»2

                       Wilputte2
                       b
3,480 (both batteries combined)5
2,100 (both batteries combined)5

No. 2 (serves          No. 3 (serves
battery No. 3)A»88     battery No. 4)88
Rectangular8"

TDS <100088



Baffles88

Redwood88
197389
• Baffles in a grid-type arrangement
  within each tower."
                       Rectangular8^

                       TDS <100088



                       Baffles88

                       Redwood88
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery No. 4 was shut down in Dec. 1980 due to low coke demand.

bBattery No. 4 was rebuilt in 1978.2

clnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2

^Quench water is considered clean.2

eQuench water acquired from the Ohio River.88
                                      237

-------
                  TABLE 3.  CARONDELET COKE3 IN ST. LOUIS, MO

             COKE OVEN  QUENCHING  PROCESS AND EMISSION  CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:

TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:

QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):b

QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):

QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

  TYPE OF BAFFLES:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
A90
C90
Wilputte90    Simon-Carves2   Koppers90
191390        191390          195290
196790        197590          19749
1,000 (all three batteries combined)5
  800 (all three batteries combined)5

No. 1 (serves all three batteries)^

Straight-through91



3,000 gal/quench90

Baffles90,91

Wood90,91
196890
• Tower contains three sets of baffles,
  inclined 45°90
• Approximately 2 feet of open area appears
  at end of baffles90
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aPlant was previously owned by Great Lakes Carbon Corp. prior to Jan. 1981.90

^Quench water is untreated Mississippi River water.90
                                      238

-------
         TABLE 4.  CHATTANOOGA COKE & CHEMICAL CORP. IN CHATTANOOGA, TN

              COKE  OVEN  QUENCHING  PROCESS  AND  EMISSION  CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:

TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:

QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):b>c

QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):

QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

  TYPE OF BAFFLES:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. I2

Semet/Solvay92
19182
I96092
No. 22

Wilputte92
19412
1979a,2
576 (both batteries combined)-*

No. 1 (serves both batteries)^

Rectangular92

TSS < 100 and TDS < 60093



Baffles93

Wood93
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2

bWater quality as stated in the Consent Decree.93

cQuench water is considered clean.2
                                      239

-------
           TABLE  5.   CITIZENS  GAS  AND  COKE  UTILITY  IN INDIANAPOLIS,  IN

              COKE OVEN  QUENCHING  PROCESS AND  EMISSION CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:8

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:

  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:


QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:
QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):c
Wilputte2   Koppers2
19462       19412
1,086 (E and H
 batteries combined)5
1,002 (E and H
 batteries combined)5

   No. 1 (serves
   batteries E
   and H)95

Straight throughb>95
Recirculated TDS
<150095
QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):       10,00097

QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM: Baffles95
  TYPE OF BAFFLES:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
Wood95
12

Dravo-Still94
19792
1,64595
No. 2 (serves
battery I)95
Straight through;95
Carl Still offset96

Recirculated TDS
<1000;95 TDS - 60096
Baffles97

Wood97
I96095
• Tower equipped with
  mist suppressor and
  spray wash.95
• "Special" type
  baffles installed96
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery F and G, both 40 oven Wilputte batteries which started up in 1926
 and 1929 respectively, were shut down in 1979.96

^Currently constructing new tower for Batteries E and H.96

cQuench water is considered clean, composed of cooling tower water and some
 recirculated water.2,95
                                         240

-------
                    TABLE  6.  DETROIT  COKE  CO.  IN  DETROIT, MI

              COKE OVEN  QUENCHING  PROCESS AND EMISSION  CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:

TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:

QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):b

QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):

QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

  TYPE OF BAFFLES:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. 62

Semet/Solvay2
19682>98
1978a»2
2,ISO5
2,0005

No. 44
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2

^Quench water is considered clean.2
                                      241

-------
                TABLE 7.  DONNER-HANNA COKE CORP. IN BUFFALO, NY

              COKE  OVEN  QUENCHING  PROCESS  AND  EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
AB2
Koppers2
19512
No. 32
Koppers2
19642
No. 42
Koppers2
19672
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:
TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:


QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):a

QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):


QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

  TYPE OF BAFFLES:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
3,004 (three batteries combined)5
3,004 (three batteries combined)5
East (serves
battery AB)19

Straight-
through-^
~8,000 gal/
quench19

Baffles19

Wood19
West  (serves batteries
No. 3 and 4)19

Straight-through19
~8,000 gal/quench19


Baffles19

Wood19
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aQuench is water considered clean.2,19
                                       242

-------
                      TABLE  8.  EMPIRE  COKE  CO.  IN HOLT,  AL

              COKE  OVEN  QUENCHING  PROCESS  AND  EMISSION  CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:

TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:b

QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):c»d

QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):

QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

  TYPE OF BAFFLES:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No.
Semet/Solvay67
1906a>67
No. 22

Semet/Solvay67
1906a»67
360 (both batteries combined)*


No. 1 (serves both batteries)^

Straight-through67
Bafflesb»67

Wood67
197467
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBoth batteries were rebuilt in 1978.2

bQuench tower rebuilt in 1974,  with baffles.67

cQuench water is considered clean.2

^Quench water consists of recirculated water with fresh water makeup.
                                        243

-------
       TABLE 9.  MERCIER CORP./ERIE COKE AND CHEMICALS IN PAINESVILLE, OH

             COKE  OVEN  QUENCHING  PROCESS  AND  EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:

TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:

QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):b

QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):

QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

  TYPE OF BAFFLES:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. I2

Koppers-Becker2
1926a»100
No. 22

Koppers-Beker2
I926a,100
450 (both batteries combined)5
400 (both batteries combined)5

No. 1 (serves both batteries)^

Straight-through80

TDS = 344-378 (sump outlet)101



Baffles80

Wood80
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery was rebuilt in 1972.2

^Quench water is dirty (recirculated),2>80
                                      244

-------
          TABLE 10.  INDIANA GAS AND CHEMICAL CORP. IN TERRE HAUTE, IN

              COKE  OVEN  QUENCHING  PROCESS  AND  EMISSION  CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:

TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:

QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/1):

QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):

QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

  TYPE OF BAFFLES:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. I2
19192
1978a>2
No. 22
19262
1978a»2
400 (both batteries combined)^
340 (both batteries combined)^

No. 1 (serves both batteries)4

Straight-through102.103

TDS = 342104



Baffles102*103

Wood;102 Redwood103

• Baffles arranged at 45° angle103
• Wooden tower103
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation2

^Quench water is considered clean-21
                                   245

-------
       TABLE 11.  IRONTON COKE CORP./A SUBSIDIARY OF MCLOUTH STEEL CORP.
                  IN IRONTON, OH

              COKE OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION  CONTROL DATA


BATTERY DESIGNATIONS               No. lb>2                No.  2C.2

  MANUFACTURER:                     Semet/Solvay105         Wilputte105
  STARTUP DATE:                     1917105                 1954105
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:       1947d>105               1978e>105
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:                   2,650 (for a three battery operation)5
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:                  2,223 (for a three battery operation)5

QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION^          No. 2 (serves both batteries)8»105

TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:               Straight-through106.107

QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/1):        Ohio River water:  TDS at intake - 20107

QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):        610 gal/hr/ton of coke107

QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:   Baffles106

  TYPE OF BAFFLES:                   Wood106
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:               • Tower constructed of concrete, brick and
                                      steel107
                                    • Tower dimensions—40 ft high,  19 ft x
                                      50 ft at outlet107


ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery No. 3 (76 oven-Wilputte)  presently shut down.52

^Battery No. 1 operating on a 48-hour coke time to keep ovens hot.52

cBattery No. 2 was shut down between Jan.  1980 and Feb. 1981.

^Involved the addition of ovens.105

elnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2*105

fQuench Station No.  1 (open area operation with no tower) was shut down in
 Feb. 1981.105

STower upgraded between 1978-1979.106


                                       246

-------
    TABLE 12.  JIM WALTER RESOURCES, INC./COKE,  IRON AND CHEMICALS DIVISION
               IN BIRMINGHAM,  AL

             COKE  OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
No. 32
Koppers2
19522
1979b,61
No. 42
Koppers2
19562
!98ib,61
No. 52
Koppers2
19592
1981b» 61
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:0

TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:

QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):d>e

QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):

QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

  TYPE OF BAFFLES:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
2,760 (for five battery operation)5
2,400 (for five battery operation)5

No. 2 (serves all three batteries)^

Straight-through61*62
Baffles61.62

Wood61*62

• Baffles arranged laterally61
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery Nos. 1 and 2 were shut down in Aug. 1980.61

^Involved standpipe replacement and topside work.61

cTower was completely rebuilt in Sept. I960.62

^Quench water is recirculated with fresh water makeup.62

eQuench water is considered clean.2
                                        247

-------
           TABLE 13.  KOPPERS CO., INC./INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS DIVISION,
                      ERIE PLANT IN ERIE, PA

              COKE  OVEN QUENCHING PROCESS  AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:8

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:

TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:

QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):c

QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):

QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

  TYPE OF BAFFLES:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
A2

Koppers2
1943b,108
B2

Koppers2
1943b>2
730;! 6255 (both batteries combined)
600 (both batteries combined)5

No. 1 (serves both batteries)^

Straight-through109
Baffles109

Wood109
Early 1970's109
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aFacility previously owned and operated by Interlake, Inc.1

bBoth batteries were rebuilt in 1971.2

cQuench water is considered clean.2,109
                                     248

-------
           TABLE 14.  KOPPERS CO., INC./INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS DIVISION,
                      TOLEDO PLANT IN TOLEDO, OH

             COKE OVEN QUENCHING  PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:a
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:

TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:

QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):b

QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):

QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

  TYPE OF BAFFLES:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
c2.no

Wilputte2
19532,110
8145
7025

No. I4

Straight-through110»11:L

TDS = 437 and TSS = 29112

400 gal/quench110

Baffles111

Wood111
1970110
• Tower dimensions;110
  Top inside = 50.5 ft long by
  20.5 ft wide
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery C was on hot idle from Sept. 1980 to Aug. 1981111

^Quench water is considered clean.
                                     249

-------
   TABLE 15.  KOPPERS CO., INC./INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS DIVISION, WOODWARD PLANT
              IN WOODWARD, AL

             COKE OVEN QUENCHING  PROCESS  AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA


BATTERY DESIGNATION:*1               No. I2             No. 4A and 4Bb»113

  MANUFACTURER:                     Koppers2           Koppers2
  STARTUP DATE:                     197761             194961
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:                          1981°>61
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:                   2,047 (all six batteries combined)5
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:                  1,272 (all six batteries combined)5

QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:           North (serves batteries No. 1, 4A
                                    and 4B)4>109

TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:              Straight-through61*109

QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):d

QUENCH WATER USE RATE  (gpm):

QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM: Baffles109

  TYPE OF BAFFLES:                  Wood109
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:


                                   (continued)
                                   250

-------
                              TABLE 15 (continued)

              COKE  OVEN  QUENCHING  PROCESS  AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:

TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:

QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):d

QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):

QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

  TYPE OF BAFFLES:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. 2A2     No. 2B2
No. 5b»2
Koppers2    Koppers2    Koppers2
197761      193761      195261
            !978c,61    1978c,61
See previous page-*


South (serves all three batteries)^*

Straight-through61'109
Baffles1^
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery No. 3: was permanently shut down in November 1974.61

bBattery Nos. 4A, 4B, and 5 were idling hot for a 14-month period (May 1980-
 July 1981) and were rechaged in July 1981.62

clnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.61

dQuench water is dirty (recirculated); 57.6 percent total quench water volume
 is process wastewater.2*1^
                                    251

-------
    TABLE 16.  MILWAUKEE SOLVEY COKE CO./DIVISION OF PICKANDS MATHER AND CO.
               IN MILWAUKEE, WI

              COKE  OVEN  QUENCHING  PROCESS  AND  EMISSION  CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:3
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:

TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:

QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):b

QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):

QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:0
No. 32
No. 42
800 (both batteries combined)5
725 (both batteries combined)5

No. 1 (serves both batteries)4

Straight-through114

TDS - 394 and TSS = 398115

53115
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBoth batteries were rebuilt in 1974.2

^Quench water is dirty (recirculated) water.2*114

cNo baffles installed.114
                                     252

-------
           TABLE 17.  PHILADELPHIA COKE CO., INC. IN PHILADELPHIA, PA

              COKE  OVEN  QUENCHING  PROCESS  AND EMISSION  CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:                         A/B2

  MANUFACTURER:                              Koppers-Becker116
  STARTUP DATE:                              19292
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:                            9405
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:                          8805

QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:                    No. I4

TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:                        Straight-through117

QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/1):a                Make-up water TDS = 150-300116

QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):                 6,000 (avg.)116

QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:           Baffles117

  TYPE OF BAFFLES:                           Wood117
  DATE INSTALLED:                            I960117
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:


ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aQuench waster is clean water per order of Consent Decree.117
                                     253

-------
                TABLE 18.  TONAWANDA COKE CORP. IN TONAWANDA, NY

              COKE OVEN  QUENCHING  PROCESS  AND  EMISSION  CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

QUENCH TOWER DESIGNATION:

TYPE OF QUENCH TOWER:

QUENCH WATER QUALITY (mg/l):b

QUENCH WATER USE RATE (gpm):

QUENCHING EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

  TYPE OF BAFFLES:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. 218

Wllputte2
19622
East and West19

Straight-through (both towers)19



9,000-10,000 gal/quench (both towers)19

Baffles (within East tower only)c»19

Wood19
197619
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery No. 1 was shut down in June 1972.18

^Quench water is considered clean.2>19

cNo baffles in West tower.19
                                     254

-------
     MATERIAL IN THIS SECTION SUBJECT TO CONFIDENTIALITY

    REVIEW AND IS NOT RELEASABLE AS OF FEBRUARY 1, 1982.

   FOR INFORMATION, CONTACT L. KESARI, U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL

PROTECTION AGENCY, DIVISION OF STATIONARY SOURCE ENFORCEMENT.
                                                                                   o
                                                                                   W td
                                                                                   a pd
                                                                                     o
                                                                                   a
                                                                                   o
                                                                                   EC
                                                                                   H
                                                                                   a
                                                                                   o

-------
                                   REFERENCES

                               COKE  OVEN  QUENCHING
 1.   World Steel Industry Data Handbook.  Volume I.  United States.
     Mc-Graw-Hlll Magazine.  1978.  pg. 20-25.  (Reliability No. A.)

 2.   Technical Approach for a Coke Production Cost Model.  PEDCo
     Environmental,  Inc.  EPA Contract No. 68-02-3071.  Table 3-1 and 3-2.
     (Reliability No. 4.)

 3.   EPA Region V file review by GCA/Technology Division.  December 1981.

 4.   Computer printout.  Prepared by PEDCo Environmental, Inc. for U.S.
     Environmental Protection Agency.  Data compilation of Coke Oven Batteries
     in the United States.  1979.  (Reliability No. 3.)

 5.   Development Document for Proposed Effluent Limitations Guidelines and
     Standards for the Iron and Steel Manufacturing Point Source Category.
     EPA-440/1-79-024a, Vol. II.  Draft Report, U.S. Environmental Protection
     Agency, Effluent Guidelines Division Office of Water and Waste
     Management, Washington, D.C.  October 1979.  pg. 18-49.  (Reliability
     No. 4.)

 6.   Telephone conversation.  Ed Luebering, SW District-Ohio EPA to Gene
     Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  March 9, 1981.  (Reliability No. 2.)

 7.   Telephone conversation.  Steve Samorgin, Southwest District-Ohio
     Environmental Protection Agency to Sandy Beaton, GCA/Technology
     Division.  October 1981.  (Reliability No. 2.)

 8.   EPA Region V files.  (Notes by Mr. Harris, Ohio EPA-RE:  1977, Inspection
     at ARMCO/Hamilton.)
                                                                   i
 9.   Engineering Analysis of Emission Controls Wet Quench Towers.  Midwest
     Research Institute.  MRI Project No. 4369-L(7).  Final Report.  RACT
     510105-510242.   (Reliability No. 2.)

10.   EPA Region V files.  (Letter from C. Kramer-ARMCO Inc. to Region V in
     response to Coke Quench Questionnaire by EPA, dated 12/28/78.)

11.   Telephone conversation.  Bernard Bloom, U.S. EPA, Washington, D.C. to
     Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division.  November 1980-February 1981.
     (Reliability No. 2.)

                                      255

-------
12.  Petroccia, M., et al.  Assessment of Air Emissions from and Controls for
     Iron and Steelmaking Sources.  Bethlehem Steel Corp./Burns Harbor-Coke
     Plant Evaluation.  GCA/Technology Division Report No. TR-80-56-G.
     Prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.  July 1980.
     (Reliability No. 1.)

13.  Telephone conversation.  Andy Sunderland, Indiana State Board of Health
     to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  March 3, 1981.  (Reliability
     No. 2.)

14.  The Impact of New Source Review Policy on Capacity Expansion in the
     Integrated Iron & Steel Industry.  Prepared by PEDCo Environmentalists,
     Inc.  Contract No. 68-01-5153.  October 1979.  (Reliability No. 3.)

15.  RACT Box No. 503717-503719.  (Reliability No. 1.)

16.  Telephone conversation.  Bob Clark, PADER-Ebensburg, PA to Sandy Beaton,
     GCA/Technology Division.  November 1981.  (Reliability No. 2.)

17.  Telephone conversation.  Bob Clark, Pennsylvania Department of
     Environmental Resources to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.
     March 2, 1981.  (Reliability No. 2.)

18.  Letter response.  Richard Craig.  U.S. EPA Region II to William Farino,
     GCA/Technology Division.  December 1981.  (Reliability No. 1.)

19.  Telephone conversation.  Henry Sandonato, New York Department of
     Environmental Conservation to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.
     February 17, 1981.  (Reliability No. 2.)

20.  Telephone conversation.  Mark Sylvester, Maryland State Department of
     Health and Mental Hygiene to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division.
     February 13, 1981.  (Reliability No. 2.)

21.  Telephone conversation.  Ralph Hall, Maryland State Department of Health
     and Mental Hygiene to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division.  October
     29, 1981.  (Reliability No. 2.)

22.  Letter from J. W. Colbert, General Manager of BSC/Sparrows Point Plant,
     Sparrows Point, Maryland, to Stephen Wassusserg, Director of Enforcement
     Division, U.S. EPA Region III.  RE:  Information request subsequent to
     EPA inspection of Sparrows Point's air control systems of March 17, 18,
     and 27, 1975.  Letter dated April 11, 1975.  JACA library.  (Reliability
     No. 3.)

23.  Stack Test Report No. 78.  Bethlehem Steel Corporation/Sparrows Point,
     Maryland.  Coke Oven Underfire Stacks.  Tests by Maryland Dept. of Health
     and Mental Hygiene.  1975.  JACA Library.  (Reliability No. 1.)

24.  Telephone conversation.  Dennis Myers, Colorado State Department of
     Health to Steve Piper, GCA/Technology Division.  February 1981.
     (Reliability No. 2.)

                                     256

-------
25.  Oliver,  J. F.   Control of Visible Emissions at CF&I's Coke Plant in
     Pueblo,  CO.  JAPCA.  29(9)):920-925.  September 1976.  (Reliability
     No. 3.)

26.  Telephone conversation.  Dennis Myers, Colorado State Department of
     Health to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division.  November 1981.
     (Reliability No. 2.)

27.  Nunno, T. J.,  et al.  Assessment of Air Emissions from Steel Plant
     Sources.  Ford Motor Co./River Rouge Coke Plant Inspection.
     GCA/Technology Division Report No. TR-81-38-G.  Prepared for U.S.
     Environmental  Protection Agency.  April 1981.  (Reliability No. 1.)

28.  EPA Region V files.  (Ford letter response to 114 request by EPA—dated
     1/17/79.)

29.  EPA Region V files.  (EPA-Ford quench water tests—3/14/79.)

30.  Air, Water and Inland Steel.  Inland Steel Publication.  1979.
     (Reliability No. 4.)

31.  Telephone conversation.  Don Kuh, Indiana State Board of Health to Gene
     Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  March 4, 1981.  (Reliability No. 2.)

32.  EPA Region V files.  (Letter from Inland Steel to EPA—August 1981.)

33.  Cost Effectiveness Model for Pollution Control of Coke Facilities.
     EPA-600/2-79-185.  August 1979.  Table 8.  (Reliability No. 4.)

34.  RACT Box No. 509248.  (Reliability No. 3.)

35.  Patton,  R. S.   Hooded Coke Quenching System for Air Quality Control.
     Iron and Steel Engineer.  50(8):41-47.  August 1973.  (Reliability No. 3.)

36.  Telephone conversation.  J. Solkorowski, City of Chicago Department of
     Inspectional Services to Marc Grant, GCA/Technology Division.  March 5,
     1981.  (Reliability No. 2.)

37.  Telephone conversation.  Ken Bowman, Pennsylvania Department of
     Environmental  Resources—Pittsburgh, PA. to Michael Jasinski,
     GCA/Technology Division.  February 18, 1981.   (Reliability No. 2.)

38.  Petroccia, M., et al.  Assessment of Air Emissions from and Controls for
     Iron and Steelmaking Sources.  J&L Steel Corp./Aliquippa Works.
     GCA/Technology Division Report No. TR-81-57-G.  Prepared for U.S.
     Environmental  Protection Agency.  July 1981.   (Reliability No. 1.)

39.  Engineering Study of J&L Quench Towers in Aliquippa, PA and Campbell,
     OH.  November 6, 1980.  (Reliability No. 1.)
                                     257

-------
40.  Telephone conversation.  Ted Davis, Northeast District-Ohio EPA to Gene
     Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  February 27, 1981.  (Reliability
     No. 2.)

41.  EPA Region V files.  (J&L Steel Corp. letter to EPA—April 1978.)

42.  Telephone conversation.  Ed Wojciechowski, U.S. Environmental Protection
     Agency-Region V to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  February 4,
     1981.  (Reliability No. 2.)

43.  EPA Region V files.  (J&L Steel Corp. letter to EPA—1981.)

44.  Telephone conversation.  S. Banninthaya, Allegheny County Health
     Department to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  February 25, 1981.
     (Reliability No. 2.)

45.  Spawn, P. and R. Li.  Assessment of Air Emissions from and Controls for
     Iron and Steelmaking Operations.  Kaiser Steel Corp./Fontana Works Coke
     Plant.  GCA/Technology Division Report No. TR-79-53-G.  Prepared for U.S.
     Environmental Protection Agency.  December 1980.  (Reliability No. 1.)

46.  Telephone conversation.  Lois Green, U.S. EPA Region IX to Michael
     Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division.  November 1981.  (Reliability No. 2.)

47.  Telephone conversation.  Norm Ernstein, South Coast Air Quality
     Management District to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  February
     25, 1981.  (Reliability No. 2.)

48.  Telephone conversation.  Robert Bean, South Coast Air Quality Management
     District to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division.  October 1981.
     (Reliability No. 2.)

49.  Telephone conversation.  Tom Blair, Radian Corp. in Austin, Texas to Gene
     Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  March 3, 1981.  (Reliability No. 2.)

50.  EPA Region V files.  (National Steel Corp./Great Lakes Steel Division.
     response to EPA questionnaire—dated 2/21/78.)

51.  EPA Region V files.  (Data supplied by National Steel Corp./Great Lakes
     Steel Division to EPA.)

52.  EPA Region V engineers comments to GCA/Technology Division
     questionnaire.  December 1981.

53.  EPA Region V files.  (Region V calculations made on 8/1/79 for National
     Steel Corp./Great Lakes Steel Division.)

54.  Telephone conversation.  Anton Telford, Illinois Environmental Protection
     Agency to Sandy Beaton, GCA/Technology Division.  October 1981.
     (Reliability No. 2.)
                                     258

-------
55.  EPA Region V files.  (State permits for National Steel Corp./Granite City
     Steel Division.)

56.  Formadley, R. J.  Granite City:  Bold Modernization of an Integrated
     Steel Plant.  Iron and Steel Engineer.  August 1980.  pp. SL-67-SL-80.
     (Reliability No. 3.)

57.  Spawn, P., et al.  Assessment of Air Emissions from and Controls for Iron
     and Steelmaking Sources.  National Steel Corp./Weirton Steel
     Division—Plant Inspection.  GCA/Technology Division Report No.
     TR-81-118-G.  Prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
     November 1981.  (Reliability No. 1.)

58.  Telephone conversation.  John Raggi, West Virginia Air Pollution Control
     Commission to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  February 17, 1981.
     (Reliability No. 2.)

59.  Stationary Source Sampling Report on Particulate Emission Testing of Coke
     Quench Tower Stack-Battery No. 8.  National Steel Corp./Weirton Steel.
     Sept. 1980 report.  Entropy Environmentalists, Inc.  JACA Library.
     (Reliability No. 1.)

60.  Ferrous Metallurgical Processes Review.  EPA Publication.  Vol. 2,
     No. 1.  September 1980.  p. 1-3.  (Reliability No. 4.)

61.  Letter response.  Paul Pate, Director of Jefferson County Department of
     Health to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division.  December 1981.
     (Reliability No. 1.)

62.  Telephone conversation.  Veda Hampton, Jefferson County Department of
     Health to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  February 25, 1981.
     (Reliability No. 2.)

63.  EPA Region V files.  (Arthur D. Little report on a new battery at
     RSC/Chicago—1978.)

64.  EPA Region V files.  (Republic Steel Corp. petition for variance with
     EPA--1974.)

65.  Letter response.  Gary Nied, Cleveland Division of Air Pollution Control
     to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  March 9, 1981.  (Reliability
     No. 1.)

66.  Telephone conversation.  Mr. Habib, Cleveland Division of Air Pollution
     Control to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  February 27, 1981.
     (Reliability No. 2.)

67.  Telephone conversation.  Sue Robertson, State of Alabama Air Pollution
     Control Division to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division.  October
     27, 1981.  (Reliability No. 2.)
                                     259

-------
68.  Telephone conversation.  A. Pasko, Canton City Health Department to Gene
     Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  March 5, 1981.  (Reliability No. 2.)

69.  Letter response.  Andy Pasko, Canton City Health Department to Sandy
     Beaton, GCA/Technology Division.  October 1981.  (Reliability No. 1.)

70.  EPA Region V files.  (Trip report by Dan Bakk—2/20-80.)

71.  Letter response.  Dennis Bush, Northeast District-Ohio EPA to Sandy
     Beaton, GCA/Technology Division.  October 1981.  (Reliability No. 1.)

72.  Spawn, P., et al.  USSC/Clairton Works Coke Plant in Clairton, PA.
     GCA/Technology Division Report No. TR-80-30-G.  Prepared for U.S.
     Environmental Protection Agency.  April 1980.  (Reliability No. 1.)

73.  Spawn, P., et al.  Assessment of Air Emissions from and Controls for Iron
     and Steelmaking Sources.  United States Steel Corp./Fairfield Works Coke
     Plant.  GCA/Technology Division Report No. TR-79-59-G.  Prepared for U.S.
     Environmental Protection Agency.  November 1980.  (Reliability No. 1.)

74.  Coke Battery Survey Procedures, Description and Data Presentations.
     USSC/Fairfield Works in Fairfield, Alabama.  EPA-330-1-77-012.  Dec.
     1977.  RACT 501519 [start].  (Reliability No. 1.)

75.  Telephone conversation and letter response.  Tom McGinley, PADER-
     Morristown, PA to Sandy Beaton, GCA/Technology Division.  November 1981.
     (Reliability No. 1.)

76.  Report on emissions tests conducted on Quench Towers No. 3 and No. 5 and
     Quench Tower Air Quality Impact Modelng at U.S. Steel Corp./Gary Works in
     Gary, Indiana.  Volumes I and II.  RACT No. 508889-509247.  (Reliability
     No. 1.)

77.  EPA Region V files.  (Letter from State of Ind.—EPA to United States
     Steel Corp./Gary Works—Oct. 1981.)

78.  EPA Region V files.  (Letter from United States Steel Corp./Gary Works to
     EPA-1978.)

79.  EPA Region V files.  (U.S. Steel Corp./Gary Works response to EPA
     interrogatory—1979.)

80.  Telephone conversation.  Dennis Bush, Ohio Northeast District Air
     Pollution Control Board to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.
     February 27, 1981.  (Reliability No. 2.)

81.  Laube, A. H. and B. A. Dummond.  Coke Quench Tower Emission Testing
     Program.  EPA-600/2-79-082.  York Research Corp.  April 1979.
     (Reliability No. 1.)
                                       260

-------
82.  National Enforcement Investigation Center.  Report on Plant Inspection at
     United States Steel Corp./Geneva Works.  1979.  (Reliability No. 2.)

83.  Letters from Steve Piper, GCA/Technology Division to Connally Hears, U.S.
     EPA Region VIII.  Coke Quench Tower Inspection at United States Steel
     Corp./Geneva Works.  Letters dated October 21, 1981 and November 11,
     1981.  (Reliability No. 1.)

84.  Telephone conversation.  Mr. Kopta, Utah State Division of Environmental
     Health to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  February 27, 1981.
     (Reliability No. 2.)

85.  Letter response.  Richard Thomas, PADER-Greensburg, PA to Sandy Beaton,
     GCA/Technology Division.  December 1981.  (Reliability No. 1.)

86.  Telephone conversation.  Tony Johnson, Pennsylvania Department of
     Environmental Resources to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.
     February 26, 1981.  (Reliability No. 2.)

87.  Letter response.  John Raggi, West Virginia Air Pollution Control
     Commission to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division.  November 1981.
     (Reliability No. 1.)

88.  Letter response.  James W. Dills, Commonwealth of Kentucky Department for
     Natural Resources and Environmental Protection to Michael Jasinski,
     GCA/Technology Division.  March 2, 1981.  (Reliability No. 1.)

89.  Letter response.  James Dills, Commonwealth of Kentucky Department of
     Health to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division.  November 1981.
     (Reliability No. 1.)

90.  Letter response.  Richard Knapp, City of St. Louis Department of Health
     to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division.  November 1981.
     (Reliability No. 1.)

91.  Telephone conversation.  Richard Knapp, City of St. Louis Department of
     Health to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  February 24, 1981.
     (Reliability No. 2.)                              .

92.  Telephone conversation.  Harvey Rice, Chattanooga Air Pollution Control
     Bureau to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division.  October 26, 1981.
     (Reliability No. 2.)

93.  Telephone conversation.  Harvey Rice, Chattanooga Air Pollution Control
     Bureau to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division.  February 18, 1981.
     (Reliability No. 2.)

94.  Fabric Filter Newsletter.  Mcllvanie Inc.  No. 56.  June 10, 1980.
     pg. 5.  (Reliability No. 4.)
                                      261

-------
 95. Telephone conversation.  Dave Jordan, Indianapolis Air Pollution Control
     Board to Gene Bergsori, GCA/Technology Division.  March 4, 1981.
     (Reliability No. 2.)

 96. EPA Region V files.   (EPA Inspection at Citizens Gas and Coke—April
     1981.)

 97. Telephone conversation.  Dave Jordan, Indianapolis Air Pollution Control
     Board to Sandy Beaton, GCA/Technology Division.  October 1981.
     (Reliability No. 2.)

 98. EPA Region V files.   (Detroit Coke.)

 99. Telephone conversation.  Sue Robertson, Alabama Air Pollution Control
     State Agency to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  February 25,
     1981.  (Reliability No. 2.)

100. EPA Region V files.   (Consent Decree dated 2/5/79—Exhibit No. 2.)

101. EPA Region V files.   (Letter from Ohio EPA to Region V dated 8/1A-80.)

102. Telephone conversation.  George Karp, Vigo County Air Pollution Control
     and Ken Kearney, Indiana State Air Pollution Control Agency to Gene
     Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  March 4, 1981.  (Reliability No. 2.)

103. EPA Region V files.   (Trip Report by Phil Pekron—EPA in 1979.)

j.04. EPA Region V files.   (Sample by EPA on May 28, 1980 at Indiana Gas.)

105. EPA Region V files.   (Company Progress Report to Region V—May 1981.)

106. Telephone conversation.  Frank Phillips, Portsmouth City Health
     Department to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  February 27, 1981.
     (Reliability No. 2.)

107. EPA Region V files.   (Letter dated 12/11/78 in response to EPA
     questionnaire.)

108. RACT Box No. 503715-503716.  (Reliability No. 1.)

109. Telephone conversation.  Larry Wonders, Pennsylvania Department of
     Environmental Resources to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.
     February 26, 1981.  (Reliability No. 2.)

110. EPA Region V files.   (Permit application.)

111. Telephone conversation.  Tom Doktor, Toledo Air Pollution Agency to Gene
     Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  February 27, 1981.  (Reliability
     No. 2.)
                                      262

-------
112. EPA Region V files.  (Letter from Ohio EPA to U.S. EPA Region V—July
     1979.)

113. Jasinski, M. R.  Field Inspection Report of Major Air Point Source
     Facilities in Region IV.   Koppers, Co., Inc. in Woodward, AL.
     CCA/Technology Division.   July 8, 9, 1980.  (Reliability No. 1.)

114. Telephone conversation.  Jerry Bevington, Wisconsin Department of Natural
     Resources to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  March 9, 1981.
     (Reliability No. 2.)

115. EPA Region V files.  (EPA quench water tests at Milwaukee Solvay—May
     1980.)

116. Letter response.  Norm Glazer, City of Philadelphia Air Management to
     Sandy Beaton, GCA/Technology Division.  November 1981.  (Reliability
     No. 1.)

117. Telephone conversation.  Robert King, Director of Enforcement for
     Philadelphia Air Management to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.
     February 13, 1981.  (Reliability No. 2.)
                                  263

-------
     MATERIAL IN THIS SECTION SUBJECT TO CONFIDENTIALITY
    REVIEW AND IS NOT RELEASABLE AS OF FEBRUARY 1, 1982.
   FOR INFORMATION, CONTACT L. KESARI, U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY, DIVISION OF STATIONARY SOURCE ENFORCEMENT.

-------
                TABLE 1.   ARMCO INC./HAMILTON PLANT IN HAMILTON,  OH

          COKE  OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S)  PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:  .
  NO. OF OVENS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
  OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):

TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:
No. I1    No. 21    No. 31    No. 41

Koppers-Beckers (all four batteries)
1927a'3   19381     1941*     19471
1976b,2
                              i978b»2
45l
12-51
43-01
Gun-
flue1
12-51
43-01
Under-
jetl
12-51
40-81
Under-
jet—
12-51
40-81
Under-
jet—
                                                              Recircu-  Recircu-
                                                              lation-'-   lation-'-
TYPE OF FUEL USED:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
COG (all four batteries)^
1,930 (all four batteries combined)5
1,811 (all four batteries combined)5

Common dry ESP serves batteries No. 2,
3, and 46>7
         19816'7
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery was rebuilt in 1961.1

^Involved end-flue rehabilitation.
                                     264

-------
                TABLE  2.   ARMCO  INC./HOUSTON WORKS  IN HOUSTON,  TX

         COKE  OVEN  COMBUSTION  STACK(S)  PROCESS  AND  EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:3
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
  OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):

TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:

TYPE OF FUEL USED:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
No. I
Koppers -Becker2
19432,8
19762
No. 21

Kopper B -Becker2
19531'8
19772
47l>8
13-131
40-111
13-131
40-111
Under jet1*8

Natural Gas8
Underjet1*8
Natural Gas
           8
1,045 (both batteries combined)^
840 (both batteries combined)^
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM: Dry ESP8
  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
Precipitair9
19768
• Design inlet
  flow rate =
  75,000 acfm8
• ESP contains
  3 fields; 3
  cells; 29 gas
  passages; SCA
  543 sq ft/
  1,000 acfm;
  round-wire
  discharge
  electrodes8
• Test Data
  (1976);9"
  Inlet—70,400-
   71,200 acfm
   (range)
   404-429°F
   (range)
Dry ESP8

Precipitair9
19768
• Design inlet
  flow rate =
  25,000 acfm8
• ESP contains
  3 fields; 3
  cells; 18 gas
  passages; SCA
  583 sq ft/
  1,000 acfm;
  round-wire
  discharge
  electrodes8
• Test Data
  (1976);°
  Inlet—16,000-
   17,178 acfm
   (range)
   414-443°F
   (range)
                                   (continued)
                                       265

-------
                               TABLE  2  (continued)

         COKE  OVEN  COMBUSTION  STACK(S)  PROCESS  AND  EMISSION CONTROL DATA
                                            Outlet—66,300-
                                             71,800 acfm
                                             (range)
                                             363-389°F
                                             (range)
Outlet—17,100-
 17,600 acfm
 (range)
 380-382°F
 (range)
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.
                                     266

-------
             TABLE  3.   ARMCO  INC./MIDDLETOWN WORKS IN MIDDLETOWN,  OH

             COKE PLANT NO. 2 COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS
                            AND  EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:                      No. I1

  MANUFACTURER:                           Wilputte1
  STARTUP DATE:                           19532>10
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:                           761
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):                   13-61
  OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):                   43-91

TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:                   Underjet-Recirculation1

TYPE OF FUEL USED:                        COG (desulfurized)4

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:                         5,150 (Coke Plants No. 2 and 3
                                           c ombined ) ->
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:                       4,890 (Coke Plants No. 2 and 3
                                           combined) •*

COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:


ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
                                     267

-------
             TABLE  4.  ARMCO  INC./MIDDLETOWN WORKS  IN MIDDLETOWN,  OH

             COKE PLANT NO. 3 COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS
                           AND  EMISSION CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
  OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):

TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:
TYPE OF FUEL USED:
COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
No. I1

Dravo-Still1
19 7 61
                  No. 21

                  Dravo-Still1
                  19771
57!
19-81
52-61
Multistage
combustion,
Gun-flue1
57l
19-81
52-61
Multistage
combustion,
Gun-flue1
COG
                  COG
                                          (desulfurized)^   (desulfurized)^
See previous page-*
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
                                      268

-------
        TABLE 5.  BETHLEHEM STEEL CORP./BETHLEHEM PLANT IN BETHLEHEM, PA

         COKE  OVEN  COMBUSTION  STACK(S)  PROCESS  AND  EMISSION CONTROL  DATA


BATTERY DESIGNATION:                       2A2          2B2         3A2

  MANUFACTURER:                            Koppers-Becker  (all three
                                            batteries)2
  STARTUP DATE:                            19412        19412       19422
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:                                   102b>1            W2C>1
  OVEN HEIGHT (m):                                 32                32
  OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):

TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:                    Gun-         Gun-        Gun-
                                           flue1'2      flue1'2     flue1'2

TYPE OF FUEL USED:                          COG^11'13   COG13       COG13

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:                          5,840 (all six  batteries combined)5
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:                        5,058 (all six  batteries combined)5

COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:


                                   (continued)
                                      269

-------
                               TABLE  5  (continued)

         COKE  OVEN  COMBUSTION STACK(S)  PROCESS  AND  EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in. ):
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:
TYPE OF FUEL USED:
3B2
Koppers-
Becker
19422

32
Gun-
flue1'2
COG13
52,11
Koppers-
Becker
1953a»2

8Q2.U
42,11
Gun-
flue1*2
COG11.13
A2
McKee-Otto2
19762

802
62
Under jet1'2
COG13
COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
See previous page'
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery 5 rebuilt in 1977.12

bBattery 2A and 2B combined.1

cBattery 3A and 3B combined.5

dDesulfurized COG used.11*13
                                   270

-------
      TABLE 6.  BETHLEHEM STEEL CORP./BURNS HARBOR PLANT IN CHESTERTON, IN

         COKE  OVEN  COMBUSTION  STACK(S)  PROCESS  AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in. ):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
No. I1
Wilputte1
19 6914
1980s >15
1982b,15
821
20-514
50-71*
No. 21
Koppers1
197214


821
20-514
50-714
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:                   Underjet1         Underjet1

TYPE OF FUEL USED:                        Desulfurized COG and blast furnace
                                          gas (both batteries)15

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:                         6,670 (both batteries combined)5
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:                       5,179 (both batteries combined)5
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

alnvolved changing steam nozzles, i.e., increasing aspiration, and rebuilding
 battery top.15

"Scheduled shutdown for rebuild, i.e., double collector mains to be
 installed.15
                                       271

-------
        TABLE 7.  BETHLEHEM STEEL CORP./JOHNSTOWN PLANT IN JOHNSTOWN, PA

         COKE  OVEN  COMBUSTION  STACK(S)  PROCESS  AND  EMISSION  CONTROL  DATA


BATTERY DESIGNATION:3»b                   No. 182

  MANUFACTURER:                           Koppers2 >16
  STARTUP DATE:                           195116>17
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:                198216>18
  NO. OF OVENS:                           772»16
  OVEN HEIGHT (m):                         3.5;19 42
  OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):

TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:                   Indirect firing19

TYPE OF FUEL USED:                         COGC>17

COKE PRODUCTION:d

  RATED TONS/DAY:                         3,500 (for three battery operation)5
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:                       3,028 (for three battery operation)5

COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:


ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery No. 18 located in the Franklin Plant.   Battery Nos. 17 and 19
 (total—151 ovens), also in the Franklin Plant, were shut down in 1977.^

^Johnstown facility also contained Battery Nos. 15 and 16 (total—88 ovens),
 designated as the Rosedale Plant, shut down in 1977 due to  flood.16

Approximately 8,000 Mcf/day used.17

^Production data for Franklin Plant prior to shut down of Battery Nos. 17
 and 19.5
                                   272

-------
       TABLE 8.  BETHLEHEM STEEL CORP./LACKAWANNA PLANT IN LACKAWANNA, NY

         COKE  OVEN  COMBUSTION  STACK(S)  PROCESS  AND  EMISSION CONTROL DATA


BATTERY DESIGNATION:3                  No. 71       No. 81       No. 91

  MANUFACTURER:                        Wilputte2    Wilputte2    Wilputte2
  STARTUP DATE:                        19522        1961b>20     19692
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:                                     1982C>20
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:                        762»21       762>21       762»21
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):                12-221       12-221       20-421
  OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):                40-721       40-721       48-321

TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:                Underjet (all three batteries)22

TYPE OF FUEL USED:                     Desulfurized COG (all three batteries)20

COKE PRODUCTION:01

  RATED TONS/DAY:                      8,140 (for seven battery operation)5
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:                    6,908 (for seven battery operation)5

COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:


ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBatterles No. 3, 4, 5 and 6 were shut down in 1977.20,21

bBattery was completely rebuilt in I960.20

cScheduled shut down for rebuild.20

"Production data reflects operation of Battery Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8,
 and 9.5
                                      273

-------
   TABLE 9.  BETHLEHEM STEEL CORP./SPARROWS POINT PLANT IN SPARROWS POINT, MD

         COKE  OVEN  COMBUSTION  STACK(S)  PROCESS  AND  EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATIONS
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
OVEN LENGTH (ft-In.):
No. I2
Koppers2
I9602
1985b,23
632
32
43-01
No. 22
f\
Koppers''
19612
1985b,23
602
32
43-01
No. 32
Koppers2
19512
1982c,18
632
32
43-01
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:

TYPE OF FUEL USED:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:

  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
Gun-type2-*   Gun-type2^   Gun-type2^
5,500 (all eight batteries
 combined)2^
                                   (continued)
                                       274

-------
                              TABLE  9  (continued)

         COKE OVEN  COMBUSTION  STACK(S)  PROCESS  AND  EMISSION  CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
No. 42
Koppers2
19782
198 5b>23
"
43-01
No. 52
Koppers2
19782
1985b,23
632
32
43-02
No. 62
Koppers2
19532
1982c,18
32
43-02
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:

TYPE OF FUEL USED:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
           Gun-type2^
See previous
                                   (continued)
                                       275

-------
                               TABLE  9  (continued)

         COKE  OVEN  COMBUSTION  STACK(S)  PROCESS  AND  EMISSION CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
  OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):

TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:

TYPE OF FUEL USED:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
No. II2
Koppers-Becker
19552             19572
                  No. 122

              2   Koppers-Becker2
652
42
43-01
Underjet1
COG25
652
42
43-01
Underjetl
COG25
See previous page2^
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery Nos. 9 and 10 were shut down in early 1981.
     Battery "A" to startup in December 1981; new Battery "B" scheduled to
 startup in December 1985 will replace Battery Nos. 1, 2, 4, and 5.2^

cPlant has the option to either shut down battery Nos. 3 and 6 in 1982,
 or continue their operation until 1985.
                                       276

-------
             TABLE 10.  CF&I STEEL CORP./PUEBLO PLANT IN PUEBLO, CO

         COKE  OVEN  COMBUSTION  STACK(S)  PROCESS  AND  EMISSION CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
Bl
Koppers2

13-027
43-227
d
Koppers2
19742>26

13-027
43-227
Dl
Koppers-
n
Becker
I9602
1974a>2

13-027
43-227
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:                   Gun-flue (all three batteries)1

TYPE OF FUEL USED:                        COG (all three batteries)28

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:


ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation, and conversion from single to double
 collector mains.2»26
                                       277

-------
           TABLE  11.   FORD MOTOR  CO./RIVER ROUGE  PLANT  IN DEARBORN, MI

         COKE  OVEN  COMBUSTION  STACK(S)  PROCESS  AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA


BATTERY DESIGNATION:8                     A1                Ax1


  MANUFACTURER:                           Koppers-          Wilputte2'29
                                           Becker2'29
  STARTUP DATE:                           1937b>1           197230
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:                                1979C>2
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:                           451               131
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):                   13-31             13-31
  OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):                   40-41             40-41

TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:                   Underjet1'29      Double-divided,
                                                            gun-f
TYPE OF FUEL USED:                        COG or enriched BFG (both
                                          batteries)30

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:                         4,340 (all five batteries combined)5
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:                       3,945 (all five batteries combined)5
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
                                        .d
                                   (continued)
                                      278

-------
                              TABLE 11 (continued)

         COKE  OVEN  COMBUSTION  STACK(S)  PROCESS  AND EMISSION  CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE: .
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-ln.):
  OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):

TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:
                                                                    DxJ
Koppers-Becker (all three batteries)2'29
19376,1      1939^1-         19631
1979C»2      1977C>2
                             251
                             13-31
                             40-41

                             Gun
611
13-31
40-41
Gun-
flue1'29
611
13-31
40-41
Gun-
flue1'29
TYPE OF FUEL USED:
COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
COG or enriched BFG (all three
batteries)30
See previous
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:  .
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
             ESP (serves
             Battery C)31

             Precipitair31
             198131
             • Design flow
               rate 99,475-
               109,000 acfm
               at 480-550°F31
             • Flow rate
               from coke
               oven flues =
               55,000 scfm;
               gas temp. =
               550°F31
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery D pushed empty in 1972.30
^Battery rebuilt in 1964; 16 ovens have been hot and empty since 1964.
clnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2
"Batteries "A" and Ax share a common combustion stack.29
eBattery rebuilt in 1962.1
fBattery rebuilt in 1963.1
                                        279

-------
       TABLE 12.  INLAND STEEL CO./INDIANA HARBOR WORKS IN E. CHICAGO, IN

             COKE PLANT NO. 2 COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS
                            AND  EMISSION CONTROL DATA


BATTERY DESIGNATION:                      No. 61      No. 71       No. 81

  MANUFACTURER:                           Koppers-Becker (all three batteries)2
  STARTUP DATE:                           19501       19561        19581
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:             1971a>2     1974a»2
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:                           651         871          871
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):                   12-01       12-01        12-01
  OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):                   37-71       37-71        37-71

TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:                   Underjet1   Underjet1    Gun-flue1

TYPE OF FUEL USED:                        COG (all three batteries)32

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:                         6,170  (all five batteries combined)5
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:                       5,640  (all five batteries combined)5

COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM: Separate, identical ESP serves each
                                                          7 ^
                                          combustion stack'>J-)

  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:                         1980 (all three units)7
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:                     • Design flow rate = 135,000 acfm
                                            (each ESP)33
                                   (continued)
                                      280

-------
                              TABLE 12 (continued)

             COKE PLANT NO. 2 COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS
                            AND  EMISSION  CONTROL DATA


BATTERY DESIGNATION:                      No. 91          No. 101

  MANUFACTURER:                           Koppers-Becker (both batteries)2
  i-TATJrUP DATE:                           19591           19701
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:                           871             511
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):                   12-01           20-01
  OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):                   37-71           37-41

TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:                   Gun-flue1       Low differential,
                                                          underjet

TYPE OF FUEL USED:                        COG (both batteries)32

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:                         See previous page5
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:b
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2

bESP to be installed on Battery No. 9 by 1985, by Consent Decree.
                                      281

-------
       TABLE 13.  INLAND STEEL CO./INDIANA HARBOR WORKS IN E. CHICAGO, IN

             COKE  PLANTS  NO.  3a  AND  4b  COKE  OVEN COMBUSTION  STACK(S)
                       PROCESS  AND  EMISSION CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in. ):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:
TYPE OF FUEL USED:
c1
Koppers2
19741'34
1979C«34
561.34
20-21
47-111
Underjet1
COG32
No. II1
Koppers2
19781'34
69L3A
20-21
47-111
Underjet1
COG and BFG32
COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:

  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:


COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:d
2,500 (Battery
 C)5
1,562 (Battery
 C)5
3,014 (Battery
 No. II)5
2,740 (Battery
 No. II)5
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery C.1

bBattery No. II.1

clnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.'

dESP to be installed on Battery C by 1982, by Consent Decree.7
                                      282

-------
            TABLE 14.  INTERLAKE INC./RIVERDALE PLANT IN CHICAGO, IL

         COKE  OVEN  COMBUSTION  STACK(S)  PROCESS  AND  EMISSION  CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in. ):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:
TYPE OF FUEL USED:
No. I2
Wilputte1
1956;2 19571
igyga, 2, 35
502'36
12-81
40-81
Underjet1
COG37
No. 22
Wilputte1
19571
19791'2*35
502,36
12 -81
40-81
Under jet1
COG37
COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:                         1.850;1 1,7405 (both batteries
                                           combined)
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:                       1,460 (both batteries combined)5

COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2
                                       283

-------
    TABLE 15.  JONES & LAUGHLIN STEEL CORP./ALIQUIPPA WORKS IN ALIQUIPPA, PA

         COKE OVEN  COMBUSTION  STACK(S)  PROCESS  AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA


BATTERY DESIGNATION:3                     A-l1              A-5b>1

  MANUFACTURER:                           Koppers-Becker2   Koppers2
  STARTUP DATE:                           19451             19762'38
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:              197839
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:                           1061              561
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):                   13-01             20-61
  OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):                   40-51             50-71

TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:                   Underjet1'40      Twin-flue,
                                                            underjet0*1*40

TYPE OF FUEL USED:                         COG39             COGd>41

COKE PRODUCTION:6

  RATED TONS/DAY:                         4,308 (both batteries combined)39
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:                       3,500 (both batteries combined)40

COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:


ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBatteries A-3 and A-4 were shut down in I960.39

^Battery A-5 replaced Battery A-2 in 1975-1976.40

C16 twin flues per oven.41

Approximately 509,000 cfm of COG used.41

eProduction data for four battery operation (A-l, A-3, A-4, and A-5) =
 6,946 (rated tons/day); 4,506  (typical tons/day).5
                                      284

-------
     TABLE 16.  JONES & LAUGHLIN STEEL CORP./CAMPBELL WORKS IN CAMPBELL, OH

         COKE  OVEN  COMBUSTION  STACK(S)  PROCESS  AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:*1
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in. ):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-ln. ):
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:
TYPE OF FUEL USED:
No. 71
Wilputte1
19542

76*
13-01
43-01
Underjet1
COG42
No. 91
Wilputte1
19582

76*
13-01
43-01
Under jet-'-
COG42
COKE PRODUCTION:15

  RATED TONS/DAY:                         4.000;1 3.1865 (for three
                                           battery operation)
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:                       3,483 (for three battery operation)5

COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery No. 8 shut down on June 5, 1980.^2

^Production data reflects operation of battery Nos. 7, 8, and 9.
                                      285

-------
            TABLE 17.  JONES & LAUGHLIN STEEL CORP./INDIANA HARBOR
                       WORKS IN E. CHICAGO, IN

         COKE  OVEN  COMBUSTION  STACK(S)  PROCESS  AND EMISSION  CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
  OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):

TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:

TYPE OF FUEL USED:

COKE PRODUCTION:0

  RATED TONS/DAY:

  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
No. 41

Koppers-Beckerl
19562,43
No. 91

Koppers-Beckerl
19611'44
1979b»2
75!
13-01
40-643
87l
13-01
40-643
Underjet1'43

COG43»44
Underjet1'43

COG43*44
4.050;1 4.0005 (for three
 battery operation)
3,406 (for three battery operation)-*
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery No. 3 permanently shut down.44

"Involved end-flue rehabilitation.^>44

cProduction data reflects operation of battery Nos. 3, 4, and 9.
                                      286

-------
   TABLE 18.  JONES & LAUGHLIN STEEL CORP./PITTSBURGH WORKS IN PITTSBURGH, PA

         COKE  OVEN  COMBUSTION  STACK(S)  PROCESS  AND  EMISSION CONTROL  DATA

[ON DATE:
DATE:
Pii
Wilputte2
I9601
197945
591
13-01
40-91
P21
Wilputte2
19611
1977a>2
591
13-01
40-91
P3N1
Wilputte2
19611
WSO3*45
13-01
40-9 1
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITAT
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in
  OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):

TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:                   Gun-flue1

TYPE OF FUEL USED:                        COG (all three batteries)45

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:                         5,300 (all five batteries combined)5
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:                       5,230 (all five batteries combined)5

COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:


                                   (continued)
                                      287

-------
                              TABLE 18 (continued)

         COKE OVEN COMBUSTION  STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION  CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in. ):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:
TYPE OF FUEL USED:
COKE PRODUCTION:
P3S1
Wilputte2
19611
1978a>2
591
13-01
40-91
Gun-f lue
COG

P41
Koppers-Becker2
19531
I977a>2
79l
13 -O1
40-61
Underjet1
COG

  RATED TONS/DAY:                         See previous page5
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2
                                     288

-------
           TABLE 19.  KAISER STEEL CORP./FONTANA WORKS  IN FONTANA, CA

         COKE OVEN  COMBUSTION  STACK(S)  PROCESS  AND  EMISSION  CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:3
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
  OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):

TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:

TYPE OF FUEL USED:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:

  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
                  BJ
              o
Koppers-Becker
19422,A6
197347
Koppers-Becker^
194246>47
197347
45!. V
13-047
40-5 4 7
Underjet-*-
COG47
451 >47
13-047
40-547
Underjet-*-
COGC>47
4.250;1 4,1005 (all seven
 batteries combined)
3,800 (all seven batteries combined)5
Individual
baghouse48
I96048
• Baghouse
  rebagged in
  in December
  I96048
Individual
baghouse4"

AAF50
197948
t Five module
  baghouse with
  design A/C •=
  1.5:l50
• Reverse air
  cleaning5"
• Test Data
                                                              79,044-79,219
                                                               acfm (range)
                                                              407-415 °F (range)
                                   (continued)
                                      289

-------
                              TABLE 19 (continued)

         COKE  OVEN  COMBUSTION STACK(S)  PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
19492'46
19763'47
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:a
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
  OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.)'

TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:

TYPE OF FUEL USED:
COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM: Individual
                                          baghouse"
Koppers-Becker^   Koppers-Beckei™
13 -O47
40-547

Under j et-'-

COGC»47»51
                  COG

See previous page-'-'-'
195246,47
1979-1980b'47

451,47
13-047
40-547

Underjet1

BFG:51 BFG and
   3 2
  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
AAF53
197953
• Design flow
  rate = 56,000
  acfm with one
  400-hp I.D. fan
• A/C (design) =
  1.5:1 with
  total of 840
  "silicon-
  graphite"
  treated fiber-
  glass bags-*3
• Reverse Air
  cleaning5
• Test Data
  (1979);53"
  36,844-37,268
   dscfm
Individual
baghouse54

AAF54
197854
• Design flow
  rate = 100,800
  acfm with one
  500-hp I.D. fan54
• A/C (design) =
  2:1 with total
  of 1,080
  "silicon-
  graphite"
  treated fiber-
  glass bags-*4
• Reverse air
  cleaning-'4
                                   (continued)
                                        290

-------
                     TABLE 19  (continued)

COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:

  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:a
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
  OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):

TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:

TYPE OF FUEL USED:


COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
                                               F1
Koppers-
Becker2
195246,47
1978b«2
451,47
13-047
40-547
Under jet1
BFGd > 51
Koppers-
Becker2
195846,47
451,47
13-047
40-547
Gun-flue1
COG55
Koppers-
Becker2
195846,47
451,47
13-047
40-547
Gun-flue1
BFG and
COG55
                                  See  previous  pages1>
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM: Individual
                                          baghouse
                                               Separate,  but  identical
                                               baghouse  per combustion
                                               stack-* 5
MANUFACTURER: AAF46
DATE INSTALLED: 197946
SYSTEM DESCRIPTION: • Design
flow rate
- 100,800
acfm with
one 500-
hp I.D.
fan46
• A/C
(design) =
2:1 with
total of
1,080
"silicon-
graphite"
Buell/Envirotech55
197948
• Each baghouse rated
at 118,000 acfm at
450°F with one 500~hp
I.D. fan55
• Each baghouse design
A/C = 2.1:1 with
total of 1,140
"silicon-graphite"
treated fiberglass
bags^5
• Common manifold to
single stack
exhaust ^ •*

                          (continued)
                                 291

-------
                              TABLE 19 (continued)

         COKE  OVEN  COMBUSTION  STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION  CONTROL DATA
                                            treated
                                            fiberglass
                                            bags45
                                          • Reverse air
                                            cleaning
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aInvolved trimwork.4'

^Involved end-flue rehabilitation.2>47

Approximately 110-165 x 10^ cu ft per hour used.53

^Approximately 14 x 10" cu ft per hour used.4"
                                         292

-------
                 TABLE  20.   LONE  STAR STEEL CO.  IN LONE STAR,  TX

         COKE  OVEN  COMBUSTION STACK(S)  PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA


BATTERY DESIGNATION:a                         C2

  MANUFACTURER:                               Koppers2
  STARTUP DATE:                               19792
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:                               702
  OVEN HEIGHT (m):                             52
  OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):

TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:                       Underjet1

TYPE OF FUEL USED:                             COG56

COKE PRODUCTION:13

  RATED TONS/DAY:                             1.2145
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:                           6905

COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:0


ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBatteries A and B (total—78 ovens) were shut down in 1979.57

^Production data appears to be for the old batteries.5

C01d batteries A and B used an ESP (installed approximately 1972-1975, and
 manufactured by "Precipitair") for combustion stack control.57*58
                                      293

-------
    TABLE 21.  NATIONAL STEEL CORP./GREAT LAKES STEEL DIVISION IN ECORSE, MI

             COKE  PLANT  NO.  2  COKE  OVEN  COMBUSTION  STACK(S)  PROCESS
                            AND  EMISSION CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in. ):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
No. 31
Wilputte1*59
19542>59

1982b>7
70l
13-21
40-81
No. 41
Wilputte1'59
19562«59
19743, 60

781
13-21
40-81
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:


TYPE OF FUEL USED:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
Underjet, 4-      Underjet, 4-
divided1.59       divided1'59

BFG and COG59     BFG and COG59
2,500 (both batteries combined)5
2,500 (both batteries combined)5
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.^

^Scheduled shut down for rebuild, with startup in 1985.
                                     294

-------
    TABLE 22.  NATIONAL STEEL CORP./GREAT LAKES STEEL DIVISION IN ECORSE, MI

             COKE  PLANT  NO.  3  COKE  OVEN  COMBUSTION  STACK(S)  PROCESS
                            AND  EMISSION CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
  OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):

TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:

TYPE OF FUEL USED:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
No. 51

Otto1'59
1970L59
851.59
20-51
50-759

Underjet, twin-flue1*59

BFG and COG59
3,412;59 2,900s
2,7005
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
                                     295

-------
          TABLE 23.  NATIONAL STEEL CORP./GRANITE CITY STEEL DIVISION
                     IN GRANITE CITY, IL

         COKE  OVEN  COMBUSTION  STACK(S)  PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:21

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in. ):
  OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):

TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:

TYPE OF FUEL USED:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:0
Ab,61

McKee-Otto61
198061
4561
14-061
40-661
   61
COG
760-85361
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aPlant formerly operated Batteries B and C which contained 49 and 61 ovens,
 respectively.  These batteries are currently being rebuilt similar to
 Battery "A" and will contain 45 and 47 ovens, respectively."^

"This battery replaced a similar type Koppers-Becker battery containing 27
 ovens.

cBattery C combustion stack formerly controlled by ESP manufactured by
 United McGill (installed in 1979) with following specifications:62

     ©  Design flow rate = 92,000 acfm
     ®  Design SCA •= 895 ft2/!,000 acfm
     «  ESP divided into 3 units operating in parallel.
     e  Each unit/4 fields.
                                      296

-------
      TABLE  24.  NATIONAL  STEEL CORP./WEIRTON  STEEL  DIVISION  IN WEIRTON, WV

         COKE  OVEN  COMBUSTION  STACK(S)  PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3

  MANUFACTURER:

  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
  OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):

TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:
TYPE OF FUEL USED:


COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:

  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:


COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
M-71
Koppers-
Becker2
19511
1 Q Q O n 1 1
j. -7 O ^
611
13-21
40-91
Under-
M-81
Koppers-
Becker2
195363,.
1979b,64
All
13-21
40-663
Under-
jetl.64
I-l1
Koppers2
19731
1979C>2
20-4 63
47-363
Under-
jetl.64
Combination of desulfurized COG and
BFG (for all batteries)64
4,500 (for four bat-
 tery operation)"'^
4,066 (for four bat-
 tery operation)** »^
3,600 (battery
 1-1)5
3,000 (battery
 1-1)5
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBatteries M-5 and M-6 (total of 106 ovens) were shut down in September-
 October 1980.63»64

"Involved end-wall rehabilitation."4

clnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2

^Production data for the "mainland" reflects a four battery operation
 (M-5, M-6, M-7, and M-8).5'64
                                     297

-------
     TABLE 25.  REPUBLIC STEEL CORP./SOUTHERN STEEL DISTRICT, THOMAS WORKS
                IN BIRMINGHAM, AL

        COKE  OVEN  COMBUSTION  STACK(S)  PROCESS  AND EMISSION  CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
  OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):

TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:

TYPE OF FUEL USED:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:

  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
No. I
Koppers
1941a>1
1981b,65
13-01
40-01

Underjet]

COG65
1.066;5 9501
5605
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery was rebuilt in 1969.2

^Involved end-flue rehabilitation.^
                                      298

-------
         TABLE  26.   REPUBLIC  STEEL  CORP./CHICAGO  DISTRICT IN CHICAGO,  IL

         COKE OVEN  COMBUSTION STACK(S)  PROCESS  AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA


BATTERY DESIGNATION:                           No. I1

 .MANUFACTURER:                                Wilputte1'66
  STARTUP DATE:                                19432>66
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:                     1981a>18>66
  NO. OF OVENS:                                751'66
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-In.):                        13-01
  OVEN LENGTH (ft-In.):                        42-766

TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:                        Underjet1>66

TYPE OF FUEL USED:                              COG and BFG66

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:                              1.369;5 1.2001
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:                            1,3005

COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:


ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery No. 1 will be replaced (late 1981) by Battery No. 2 containing 60
 ovens, 6-m high, double collector mains, 4 charge holes, automatic lid
 lifters, using stage charging and rated at 1,800 tons of coke per day.*>6
                                      299

-------
      TABLE 27.  REPUBLIC STEEL CORP./CLEVELAND DISTRICT IN CLEVELAND, OH

            COKE PLANT NO. 1  COKE  OVEN  COMBUSTION  STACK(S) PROCESS
                           AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:8
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:b
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in. ):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:
TYPE OF FUEL USED:
No. I1
Koppers1
197612
511
13-21
41-01
Gun-
flue1
COG68
No. 21
Koppers1
19582
19722
5ll
13-21
41-01
Gun-
flue1
COG,
Desulfur-
ized67
No. 31
Koppers1
19582
19722
5ll
13-21
41-01
Gun-
flue1
COG,
Desulfur-
ized67
No. 41
Koppers1
19582
19722
5ll
13-21
41-01
Gun-
flue1
COG,
Desulfur-
ized67
COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
2,782 (all four batteries combined)5
2,049 (all four batteries combined)5
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery No. 5 was shut down in 1975.

"Included end-flue rehabilitation.2
                                     300

-------
      TABLE  28.   REPUBLIC  STEEL  CORP./CLEVELAND DISTRICT IN CLEVELAND,  OH

             COKE PLANT  NO.  2  COKE  OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS
                            AND  EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3                  No. 61              No. 71

  MANUFACTURER:                        Koppers-Becker1     Koppers-Becker1
  STARTUP DATE:                        19522               19522
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:b         19792               19792
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:                        631.                631
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):                13-21               13-21
  OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):                41-01               41-01

TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:                Gun-flue            Gun-flue

TYPE OF FUEL USED:                     COG or BFG (both batteries)67

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:                      1,954 (both batteries combined)5
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:                    1,286 (both batteries combined)5

COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery No. 5 was shut down in 1975.67

^Included end-flue rehabilitation.2
                                     301

-------
      TABLE 29.  REPUBLIC STEEL CORP./SOUTHERN DISTRICT, GULFSTEEL WORKS,
                 IN GADSDEN,  AL

         COKE  OVEN  COMBUSTION  STACK(S)  PROCESS  AND  EMISSION  CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:                   No. 21              No. 31

  MANUFACTURER:                        Wilputte1'69        Wilputte1'69
  STARTUP DATE:                        194269              I96069
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:          1973a'2
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:                        651'69              651'69
  OVEN HEIGHT (m):                     42»69               42»69
  OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):                37-01               37-01

TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:                Gun-flue1>69        Underjet1*69

TYPE OF FUEL USED:                     COG70               COG70

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:                      2,372;5 1.4001 (both batteries
                                        combined)
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:                    1,785 (both batteries combined)5

COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2
                                         302

-------
     TABLE  30.   REPUBLIC  STEEL  CORP./CENTRAL ALLOY DISTRICT IN MASSILLON,  OH

         COKE  OVEN  COMBUSTION  STACK(S)  PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
  OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):

TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:

TYPE OF FUEL USED:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
No. I1

Koppers-"-
19551

198218
13-21
41-01

Gun-flue1
   71
COG
576:5 5001
5005
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
                                      303

-------
     TABLE 31.  REPUBLIC STEEL CORP./MAHONING VALLEY DISTRICT IN WARREN, OH

         COKE  OVEN  COMBUSTION  STACK(S)  PROCESS  AND  EMISSION  CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:                             No. 41

  MANUFACTURER:                                  Koppers72
  STARTUP DATE:                                  19792
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:                                  852>72
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):                          13-042
  OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):                          41-1142

TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:                          Underjet42

TYPE OF FUEL USED:                               COG42

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:                                1,8525
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:                              1.2795

COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBatteries No. 1 and 2 were shutdown in March 1979.
                                      304

-------
   TABLE 32.  REPUBLIC STEEL CORP./MAHONING VALLEY DISTRICT IN YOUNGSTOWN, OH

         COKE  OVEN  COMBUSTION  STACK(S)  PROCESS AND EMISSION  CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-In. ):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in. ):
A1
Koppers1
19501'35

1982b,12
381
13-21
41-01
B1
Koppers1
19501'35

1982b>12
651
13-21
41 -O1
C1
Koppers1
1950s*1


591
13-21
41 -O1
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:                Gun-flue1   Gun-flue1   Gun-flue1

TYPE OF FUEL USED:                     COG42       COG42       COG42

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:                      2.970;5 2.4601 (all three batteries
                                        combined)
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:                    2,735 (all three batteries combined)5

COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:


ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery rebuilt in 1962.2

"Scheduled shut down; Federal Consent Decree.12
                                     305

-------
      TABLE 33.  UNITED STATES STEEL CORP./CLAIRTON WORKS  IN CLAIRTON, PA

        COKE OVEN COMBUSTION  STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in. ):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:
TYPE OF FUEL USED:
COKE PRODUCTION:
No. I73
Wilputte2
195573
197973
6473
13 -O73
37-073
Gun-flue73
COG45

No. 273
Wilputte2
195573
197973
6473
13-073
37-073
Gun-flue73
COG45

No. 373
Wilputte2
195573
197973
6473
13-073
37-073
Gun-flue73
COG45

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
20,780 (entire coke plant)5
16,342 (entire coke plant)5
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
                                   (continued)
                                      306

-------
                              TABLE 33 (continued)

         COKE  OVEN  COMBUSTION  STACK(S)  PROCESS  AND EMISSION CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
OVEN LENGTH (f t~in. ) :
No. 7?3
Koppers2
195474

198418
6477
42

No. 873
Koppers2
1954?5

198418
6477
42

No. 9?3
Koppers2
195476

19 8418
6477
42

TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:

TYPE OF FUEL USED:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
   45
COG
See previous
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
COG45
                                   (continued)
                                       307

-------
                              TABLE 33 (continued)

         COKE  OVEN  COMBUSTION  STACK(S)  PROCESS  AND EMISSION CONTROL  DATA


BATTERY DESIGNATION:                      No. 1573

  MANUFACTURER:                           Koppers2
  STARTUP DATE:                           1953a>78
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:                           6173
  OVEN HEIGHT (m):                         42
  OVEN LENGTH (ft-In.):

TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:

TYPE OF FUEL USED:                         COG45

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:                         See previous pages5
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:


                                   (continued)
                                      308

-------
                              TABLE 33 (continued)

         COKE  OVEN  COMBUSTION  STACK(S)  PROCESS AND EMISSION  CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
No. 16 73
Wilputte2
198218
6173
No. 17 73
Wilputte2
195080
198218
6173
42
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:

TYPE OF FUEL USED:                     COG45            COG45

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:                      See previous pages5
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:


                                   (continued)
                                      309

-------
                              TABLE 33 (continued)

         COKE  OVEN  COMBUSTION  STACK(S)  PROCESS  AND EMISSION CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:


  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
  OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):

TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:

TYPE OF FUEL USED:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
No.
1973
           No.
           2073
                      No.
                      2173
           No.
           2273
Koppers-Becker (all 4 batteries)^
195181     1947b»82   194783     194684
197773                1972C»18   1973d»18
8773
52
           8773
8773
                                 8773
Underjet (all 4 batteries)73

COG (all 4 batteries)73



See previous pages
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
  MANUFACTURER:
  DATE INSTALLED:
  SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
                      ESP
                      (serves
                      battery No.
                      Micropul45
                      197945
                      • 4 inde-
                        pendent
                        field; 2
                        operate
                        at any
                        one time
                      • Damper
                        valves
                        control
                        flow85
                                                                       85
                                   (continued)
                                       310

-------
                              TABLE 33 (continued)

         COKE  OVEN  COMBUSTION STACK(S)  PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
                                                               Power
                                                               require-
                                                               ment =
                                                               15,600
                                                               kwhr/day85
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery No. 15 rebuilt in 1979.2

bBattery No. 20 rebuilt in 1978.73

clnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.-1-^

^Involved rehabilitation from bench up.'3
                                     311

-------
      TABLE  34.  UNITED  STATES  STEEL  CORP./FAIRFIELD WORKS  IN FAIRFIELD,  AL

         COKE  OVEN  COMBUSTION STACK(S)  PROCESS  AND  EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:8                     No. 22            No. 92
  MANUFACTURER:
U.S. Steel/       Koppers-Becker2
                                           Still2
  STARTUP DATE:                           19782             195838
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:                               1974b>87
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:                                       c
  NO. OF OVENS:                           572               632
  OVEN HEIGHT (m):                         62  ,,            42  R,
  OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):                   47-7b:>            41-lBb

TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:                   Gun-flue88        Gun-flue88

TYPE OF FUEL USED:                         COG88             COG88

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:                         6,866 (appears to be for 5 battery
                                           operation, i.e., Nos. 2, 5, 6, 7,
                                           and 9)5'65
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:                       5,930 (appears to be for 5 battery
                                           operation, i.e., NOB. 2, 5, 6, 7,
                                           and 9)5'65

COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:


ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 were shut down in 1977, 1977, 1980, 1980,
 1979, and 1978, respectively.

bBattery No. 9 was rebuilt in 1979.86

cBattery No. 9 has been idling hot since August 1980.65
                                      312

-------
   TABLE  35.  UNITED  STATES  STEEL  CORP./FAIRLESS WORKS  IN FAIRLESS  HILLS,  PA

        COKE OVEN  COMBUSTION STACK(S)  PROCESS  AND  EMISSION CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in. ):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:
TYPE OF FUEL USED:
COKE PRODUCTION:
No. I1
Wilputte1
19522
1978a»2

13-61
41-01
Underjet1
COG89

No. 21
Wilputte1
19532
1978a«2

13-61
41-01
Underjet1
COG89

  RATED TONS/DAY:                          3,000 (both batteries combined)5
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:                        3,000 (both batteries combined)5
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2
                                     313

-------
           TABLE  36.   UNITED  STATES  STEEL  CORP./GARY WORKS  IN  GARY,  IN

         COKE  OVEN  COMBUSTION STACK(S)  PROCESS  AND  EMISSION CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:a

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (m):
  OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):

TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:
TYPE OF FUEL USED:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
No. I2

Koppers-Becker2
19702,90
1979b>2
No. 22

U.S. Steel/Still2
19752,90
62,90
47-4^0
Underjet90
COG92
572
62,90
47-1090
Multi-stage,
Gun-flue50
COG and BFG9
11,960 (all 8 batteries combined)5
9,750 (all 8 batteries combined)5
                                   (continued)
                                     314

-------
                              TABLE  36  (continued).

         COKE  OVEN  COMBUSTION  STACK(S)  PROCESS  AND EMISSION CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (m):
  OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):

TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:
TYPE OF FUEL USED:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
No. 32
19762'90
Multi-stage,
 Gun-flue90

COG and BFG94
See previous
No. 52
U.S. Steel/Still2   Wilputte2
19542,90
572
62,90
47-1090
198818
772,91
32,90
37-590
Double divided,
 Underjet90
COG and BFG
                                                                          95
                                   (continued)
                                      315

-------
                              TABLE  36  (continued).

         COKE  OVEN  COMBUSTION  STACK(S)  PROCESS  AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
OVEN LENGTH (ft-In. ):
No. 72
Wilputte2
195490
1978b»2
198818
772,91
32.90
37-590
No. 132
Koppers-Becker2
19512,90
1974b>2
198718
772
32,90
37-590
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:


TYPE OF FUEL USED:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
Double divided,
 Underjet90

COG and BFG96
Underjet90
COG9 7
See previous pages-*
                                   (continued)
                                     316

-------
                              TABLE  36  (continued).

         COKE  OVEN  COMBUSTION  STACK(S)  PROCESS  AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:21
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
No. 152
Wilputte2
19512,90
1977b'2

772
32,90
37-590
No. 162
Wilputte2
19492,90
1975b>2
198718
772,91
32,90
37-590
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:


TYPE OF FUEL USED:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
Double divided,
 Underjet90

COG98
Double divided,
 Underjet90

COG99
See previous pages-*
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBatteries No. 9 and 11 pushed empty in 1971; Batteries No. 10, 12, and 14
 pushed empty in 1975.90

^Involved end-flue rehabilitation.2
                                     317

-------
    TABLE 37.  UNITED STATES STEEL CORP./LORAIN-CUYAHOGA WORKS IN LORAIN, OH

         COKE OVEN COMBUSTION  STACK(S)  PROCESS AND EMISSION  CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:

STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:a
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:b
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
D38
Koppers-
Becker2
19572

198212,42
592
32
39-642
G2
Koppers-
Becker2
19562
19772

592
32
39-642
H2
Koppers-
Becker2
19552
19782

592
32
39-642
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:

TYPE OF FUEL USED:                     COG42        COG42        COG42

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:                       4,468 (all 7 batteries combined)5
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:                    4,319 (all 7 batteries combined)5

COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
                                   (continued)
                                      318

-------
                             TABLE  37  (continued).

         COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S)  PROCESS AND EMISSION  CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:a
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:b
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
12
Wilputte2
19552
19 7 92

592
S2
39-642
J2
Wilputte2
19472
19702

592
32
39-642
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:

TYPE OF FUEL USED:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
COG42             COG42
See previous page-
                                   (continued)
                                     319

-------
                              TABLE 37 (continued)

         COKE  OVEN  COMBUSTION  STACK(S)  PROCESS  AND EMISSION  CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:3
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:b
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in. ):
K38
Wilputte2
194738
19702
198212,42
5938
32
39-6*2
L38
Wilputte2
194738
19702
198212,42
5938
32
39-6*2
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:

TYPE OF FUEL USED:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
COG* 2
See previous
                  COG
                     42
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

alncluded end-flue rehabilitation.2

bBatteries D, K, and L are scheduled to be shut down in 1982; stretch out
 application filed for 1985 shutdown.71985.7
                                     320

-------
         TABLE 38.  UNITED STATES STEEL CORP./GENEVA WORKS IN PROVO, UT

         COKE  OVEN COMBUSTION  STACK(S)  PROCESS  AND EMISSION CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:                   No. I1    No. 21    No. 31    No. 41

  MANUFACTURER:                        Koppers;2 Koppers-Becker100
                                        (all 4 batteries)
  STARTUP DATE:                        1944;2 19501 (all 4 batteries)
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:          19793'2   1979a>2
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:                        63 (on each of 4 batteries)1'100
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):                13-0;100 13-61 (all 4 batteries)
  OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):                40-5;100 42-01 (all 4 batteries)

TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:                Underjet (all 4 batteries)1'100

TYPE OF FUEL USED:                     COG (all 4 batteries)101

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:                      5.000;1 3,5585 (all 4 batteries
                                        combined)
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:                    3,520 (all 4 batteries combined)5

COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2
                                     321

-------
   TABLE  39.  WHEELING-PITTSBURGH STEEL  CORP./MON VALLEY  PLANT  IN MONESSEN,  PA

         COKE OVEN  COMBUSTION  STACK(S) PROCESS  AND EMISSION CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE: •
  NO. OF OVENS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
  OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):

TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:

TYPE OF FUEL USED:

COKE PRODUCTION:d

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
No. I1
No. 21
Koppers-Becker2   Koppera-Becker^
19428'1
37c,103
13-01
43-01

Underjet]
191,2,103
13-01
43-01

Underjet1
COG
   102
1,836 (both batteries combined)5
1,332 (both batteries combined)5
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery No. 1 was rebuilt in 1981.102,103

^Battery No. 2 was rebuilt in 1979, which included conversion from a 3-hole,
 single collector main to a 4-hole, double collector main battery.2>103

GBattery No. 1 originally had 74 ovens; 37 ovens were rebuilt in 1981 which
 included conversion from a 3-hole, single collector main to a 4-hole, double
 collector main battery.  The remaining 37 ovens are being converted to a
                                       i n o n n *^
 4-hole, double collector main battery .•LUZ»-LUJ

"Production data reflects the original two-battery (93-oven) operation.5
                                     322

-------
         TABLE 40.   WHEELING-PITTSBURGH STEEL CORP./STEUBENVILLE PLANT
                    IN EAST STEUBENVILLE,  WV

        COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
• NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in. ):
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:
TYPE OF FUEL USED:
No. I2
Koppers2
1917b,104
1978e>2
A?2
32,104
37_564
Gun-flue64
COG64
No. 22
Koppers2
I917c,104
19786'2
472
32,104
37-564
Gun-flue64
COG64
COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:

  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
4,400;1 5,2055 (all 4 batteries
 combined)
4,310 (all 4 batteries combined)5
                                   (continued)
                                     323

-------
                              TABLE  40  (continued).

         COKE  OVEN  COMBUSTION  STACK(S)  PROCESS AND EMISSION  CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in. ):
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:
TYPE OF FUEL USED:
No. 32
Koppers-Becker2
19171,104
1978e»2
5l2
32,104
3 7-5 ^
Gun-flue64
COG64
No. 82
Koppers2
197638,104
792
612,104
47-1164
Under jet64
COG64
COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:                          See previous page5
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aPlant shut down Battery No. 4 (53 ovens) in 1977. Battery No.  5 (53 ovens)
 in 1976, and Battery No. 6 (63 ovens) in 1977.104

bBattery No. 1 rebuilt in 1955.2>104

cBattery No. 2 rebuilt in 1953.2»104

dBattery No. 3 rebuilt in 1964.2,104

elnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2
                                      324

-------
     MATERIAL IN THIS SECTION SUBJECT TO CONFIDENTIALITY

    REVIEW AND IS NOT RELEASABLE AS OF FEBRUARY  1,  1982.

   FOR INFORMATION, CONTACT L. KESARI, U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL

PROTECTION AGENCY, DIVISION OF STATIONARY SOURCE ENFORCEMENT.
                                                                                     o
                                                                                   ^ o
                                                                                   *Tl X
                                                                                   O W

                                                                                   3 o
                                                                                   o
                                                                                   O CO
                                                                                     n
                                                                                     W
                                                                                     co

-------
      TABLE  1.   ALABAMA  BY-PRODUCTS  CORP./TARRANT  COKE  PLANT  IN  TARRANT,  AL

         COKE OVEN  COMBUSTION  STACK(S)  PROCESS  AND EMISSION CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION: a>b
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in. ):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
No. 52»65
Koppers-
Becker65
19412,65
I96065
252
13-6 65
No. 62»65
Koppers-
Becker65
194165
198065
292
13-665
No. I;65 A2
Wilputte65
19682,65
197965
782,65
16-065
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:            Gun-flue (all three batteries)65

TYPE OF FUEL USED:                 COG (all three batteries)65

COKE PRODUCTION:0

  RATED TONS/DAY:                  2,400 (based on four battery operation)5
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:                2,100 (based on four battery operation)5

COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:


ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery No. 2 was permanently shut down in August 1979.65

^A common stack serves Battery Nos. 5 and 6.65

cProduction data reflects operation of Battery Nos. 2, 5, 6, and A.5
                                   325

-------
          TABLE 2.  ALLIED CHEMICAL CORP./ASHLAND PLANT IN ASHLAND,  KY

         COKE OVEN COMBUSTION  STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in. ):
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:
TYPE OF FUEL USED:
No. 32
Wilputte2
19532
1973C»2
762
4.52
40-8106
Under jet106
COGl°6
No. 4a»2
Wilputte2
b
702
4.5.2 5105
46-1Q106
Gun-flue106
COG106
COKE PRODUCTION:
  RATED TONS/DAY:                         3,480 (both batteries combined)5
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:                      2,100 (both batteries combined)5
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery No. 4 was shut down in December 1980 due to low coke demand.107

bBattery No. 4 was rebuilt in 1978.2

clnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2
                                     326

-------
                   TABLE  3.  CARONDELET  COKEa  IN  ST.  LOUIS, MO

         COKE  OVEN  COMBUSTION  STACK(S) PROCESS  AND  EMISSION CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in. ):
A108
Wilputte108
1913108
1967108
35108
32
37-Ol°8
B2
Simon-
Carves2
1913108
1975108
18108
32
37-0108
C108
Koppersl08
1952108 ,
1974108
4C-108
32
37-0108
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:            Underjet109   Underjet109

TYPE OF FUEL USED:                 Desulfurized COG (all three batteries)!08

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:                  1,000 (all three batteries combined)5
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:                800 (all three batteries combined)5

COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:



ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aPlant was previously owned by Great Lakes Carbon Corp. prior to January
 1981.109
                                     327

-------
        TABLE 4.  CHATTANOOGA COKE AND CHEMICAL CORP. IN CHATTANOOGA, TN

         COKE  OVEN  COMBUSTION  STACK(S)  PROCESS  AND  EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:
TYPE OF FUEL USED:
No. I2
Semet/Solvay110
19182
I960110
24;2 2512
42
Underjet110
COGllO.lll
No. 22
Wilputte110
19 41 2
1979a>2
202
42
Underfire110
OOGllO.lll
COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:                    576 (both batteries combined)110

COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:


ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2
                                     328

-------
           TABLE  5.   CITIZENS  GAS  AND COKE UTILITY  IN INDIANAPOLIS,  IN

         COKE  OVEN COMBUSTION  STACK(S)  PROCESS  AND  EMISSION CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
OVEN LENGTH (ft-In. ):
Eb»2
Wilputte2
19462

472
42
Hb>2
Koppers2
19412

4lH3
42
12
Dravo-StillH2
19792

722
52,112
49_9114
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:            Multi-stage (all three batteries)H2>H4

TYPE OF FUEL USED:                 Desulfurized COG (all three batteries)!14

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:                  1,086 (E and H batteries    1,645114
                                    combined)^
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:                1,002 (E and H batteries
                                    combined)5

COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:


ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBatteries F and G, both 40 oven Wilputte batteries started up in 1926 and
 1929, respectively, were shut down in 1979.

t>A common stack serves Batteries E and
                                     329

-------
                    TABLE  6.  DETROIT  COKE  CO.  IN  DETROIT, MI

         COKE  OVEN  COMBUSTION STACK(S)  PROCESS  AND EMISSION  CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
  OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):

TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:

TYPE OF FUEL USED:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
No. 62

Semet/Solvay2
19682,116
1978a>2

702,116
16-8H6
47-1H6

Gun-flueH6

COGH6
2,1505
2,000s
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2
                                     330

-------
                TABLE 7.  DONNER-HANNA COKE CORP. IN BUFFALO, NY

         COKE  OVEN  COMBUSTION  STACK(S)  PROCESS  AND EMISSION  CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
Afi2
Koppers2
19512

512
4; 2 221
No. 32
Koppers2
19642

SO2
42,21
No. 42
Koppers2
19672

502
42,21
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:            Gun-flue (all three batteries)22

TYPE OF FUEL USED:                 COG (all three batteries)20

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:                  3,004 (all three batteries combined)5
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:                3,004 (all three batteries combined)5

COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:3
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aOne stack serves Battery AB; common stack serves Battery Nos. 3 and 4.H
                                   331

-------
                      TABLE  8.   EMPIRE  COKE CO.  IN HOLT,  AL

         COKE  OVEN  COMBUSTION  STACK(S)  PROCESS  AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA


BATTERY DESIGNATION:                   No. I2             No. 22

  MANUFACTURER:                        Semet/Solvay69     Semet/Solvay69
  STARTUP DATE:                        1906a>69           1906a»69
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:                        202»69             402>69
  OVEN HEIGHT (m) :                      32                 32
  OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):

TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM: b               Gun-flue70         Gun-flue70

TYPE OF FUEL USED:                      COG70              COG70

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:                      360 (both batteries combined)5
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM :c


ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

      batteries were rebuilt in 1978. 2
^Each battery is equipped with separate flues for each oven, therefore, a
 single oven can be taken off-line without interferring with production.
 Each battery is completely rebuilt every 20 years.70

cNo controls; plant located in attainment area.**9
                                     332

-------
       TABLE 9.  MERCIER CORP./ERIE COKE AND CHEMICALS IN PAINESVILLE, OH

         COKE  OVEN  COMBUSTION  STACK(S)  PROCESS  AND EMISSION  CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (m):
  OVEN LENGTH (ft-ln.):

TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:

TYPE OF FUEL USED:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
No. I2
No. 22
Koppers-Becker2    Koppers-Becker2
1926a>117
232
42
Gun-flue118
COG118
232
42
Gun-flue118
COGl18
450 (both batteries combined)5
400 (both batteries combined)5
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

^Both batteries were rebuilt in 1972.
                                     333

-------
          TABLE 10.  INDIANA GAS AND CHEMICAL CORP. IN TERRE HAUTE, IN

         COKE  OVEN  COMBUSTION  STACK(S)  PROCESS  AND  EMISSION CONTROL DATA


BATTERY DESIGNATION:                   No. I2             No. 22

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:                        19192              19262
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:           1978a»2            1978a>2
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:                        302                302
  OVEN HEIGHT (m):                      42                 42
  OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):                30-0119            30-0119

TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:                Underjetl20        Underjetl20

TYPE OF FUEL USED:                      COGl20             COGl20

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:                      400 (both batteries combined)5
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:                    340 (both batteries combined)5

COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

alnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.2
                                     334

-------
       TABLE 11.  IRONTON COKE CORP./A SUBSIDIARY OF McLOUTH STEEL CORP.
                  IN IRONTON, OH

         COKE  OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S)  PROCESS AND EMISSION  CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in. ):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-In. ):
No. lb»2
Semet/Solvay121
19172,121
1947d,121
68121
11-11121
35-6121
No. 2C>2
Wilputtem
1954121
I978e,121
24121
12-2121
36-4121
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:            Horizontal flue;121   Double divided
                                                         underjet!21
TYPE OF FUEL USED:                 COGl22                COG122

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:                  2,650 (for a three battery operation)5
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:                2,223 (for a three battery operation)5

COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:


ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery No. 3 (76 oven — Wilputte) presently shut down.?

^Battery No. 1 operating on a 48-hour coke time to keep ovens hot.?

cBattery No. 2 was shut down between January 1980 and February 1981.?
 Presently the battery is on hot idle.?»l2l>l22

^Involved the addition of ovens. 121

elnvolved end-flue rehabilitation. 2> 121
                                     335

-------
    TABLE 12.  JIM WALTER RESOURCES, INC./COKE, IRON AND CHEMICALS DIVISION
               IN BIRHIMGHAM, AL

         COKE OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S)  PROCESS  AND  EMISSION  CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:8
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-In. ):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):
No. 32
Koppers2
19522
1979b»65
SO2
14-0*5
No. 42
Koppers2
19562
1981b,65
302
14-065
No. 52
Koppers2
19592
198ib,65
302
14-065
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:            Gun-flue (all three batteries)88

TYPE OF FUEL USED:                 COG (all three batteries)88

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:                  2,760 (for a five battery operation)5
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:                2,400 (for a five battery operation)5

COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery Nos. 1 and 2 were shut down in August 1980.

blnvolved standpipe replacement and topside work.65
                                   336

-------
     TABLE 13.  KOPPERS CO., INC./INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS DIVISION, ERIE PLANT
                IN ERIE, PA

         COKE  OVEN COMBUSTION STACK(S) PROCESS  AND EMISSION CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in.):
  OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):

TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:

TYPE OF FUEL USED:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
Koppers2
1943b,123
232
12-0123
42-0123
Under jetl
COG124
Koppers2
1943b»2
352
12-0123
42-0123
Under jetl
COG124
730;1 6255 (both batteries combined)
600 (both batteries combined)^
COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aFacility previously owned and operated by Interlake, Inc.l

bBattery was rebuilt in 1971.I8
                                  337

-------
    TABLE 14.  KOPPERS CO., INC./INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS DIVISION, TOLEDO PLANT
               IN TOLEDO, OH

         COKE OVEN  COMBUSTION  STACK(S)  PROCESS  AND  EMISSION  CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:3
  NO. OF OVENS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (m):
  OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):

TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:

TYPE OF FUEL USED:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
C2,125

Wilputte2
19532,125
572,126
4126
37-7125

Underjet;1 A-dividedl25

COG125,127
8145
7025
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery C was on hot idle from September 1980 to August 1981.127
                                      338

-------
   TABLE 15.  KOPPERS CO., INC./INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS DIVISION, WOODWARD PLANT
              IN WOODWARD, AL

         COKE OVEN COMBUSTION  STACK(S) PROCESS AND  EMISSION  CONTROL  DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:8
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
OVEN LENGTH (ft-in. ):
No. I2
Koppers2
197765
6Q2.128
4.2 3128
39-0128
No. 2A2
Koppers2
197765
40128
A;2 3128
39-0128
No. 2B2
Koppers2
1937^5
1978C»65
38128
4.2 3128
39-0128
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:            Single-divided, gun-flue (all three
                                   batteries)d»88

TYPE OF FUEL USED:                 COG (all three batteries)88

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:                  2,047 (all five batteries combined)5
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:                1,272 (all five batteries combined)5

COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:


                                   (continued)
                                      339

-------
                              TABLE 15 (continued)

        COKE OVEN COMBUSTION  STACK(S) PROCESS AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:8
MANUFACTURER:
STARTUP DATE:
RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
NO. OF OVENS:
OVEN HEIGHT (ft-in. ):
OVEN LENGTH (ft-In.):
TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:
TYPE OF FUEL USED:
No. 4A and 4Bb«128
Koppers2
194965
1981C>65
582
14-0^5
Gun-flue65
COG65
No. 5b»2
Koppers2
195265
1978°. 65
302
14-065
Gun-flue65
COG65
COKE PRODUCTION:
  RATED TONS/DAY:
 .TYPICAL TONS/DAY:
                                   See previous page


COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:


ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery No. 3 was permanently shut down in November 1974.65

^Battery Nos. 4A, 4B, and 5 were idling hot for a 14-month period (May 1980-
 July 1981) and were recharged in July 1981.65

clnvolved end-flue rehabilitation.65

^One stack serves Battery No. 1; common stack for Batteries 2A and 2B.128
                                      340

-------
   TABLE 16.  MILWAUKEE SOLVAY COKE CO./PICKANDS MATHER AND CO. MILWAUKEE, WI

         COKE  OVEN  COMBUSTION STACK(S)  PROCESS  AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:               No. 32                No. 42

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:a
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:                    402                   602
  OVEN HEIGHT (m):                 32                    32
  OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):            20-0129               20-Ql29

TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:            Underjet130           Underjet130

TYPE OF FUEL USED:                 COG130                COG130

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:                  800 (both batteries combined)5
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:                725 (both batteries combined)5

COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:


ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery was rebuilt in 1974.2
                                      341

-------
           TABLE 17.  PHILADELPHIA COKE CO., INC. IN PHILADELPHIA, PA

         COKE  OVEN  COMBUSTION  STACK(S)  PROCESS  AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:

  MANUFACTURER:
  STARTUP DATE:
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:
  OVEN HEIGHT (m) :
  OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):

TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:

TYPE OF FUEL USED:

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:

COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:
A/B2

Koppers-Beckefl^l
19292
742
42
40-0131

Gun-flue131

COG—Natural Gas if needed1^
9405
8805
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
                                      342

-------
                TABLE 18.  TOWAWANDA COKE CORP. IN TOWAWANDA, NY

         COKE  OVEN  COMBUSTION  STACK(S)  PROCESS  AND EMISSION CONTROL DATA
BATTERY DESIGNATION:3                         No. 221

  MANUFACTURER:                               Wilputte2
  STARTUP DATE:                               19622
  RECENT REHABILITATION DATE:
  SCHEDULED SHUTDOWN DATE:
  NO. OF OVENS:                               602
  OVEN HEIGHT (ft-ln.):                       12-221
  OVEN LENGTH (ft-in.):                       41-221

TYPE OF HEATING SYSTEM:

TYPE OF FUEL USED:                            COG20

COKE PRODUCTION:

  RATED TONS/DAY:                             1,7905
  TYPICAL TONS/DAY:                           9005

COMBUSTION STACK EMISSION CONTROL SYSTEM:


ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

aBattery No. 1 was shut down in June 1972.2^
                                      343

-------
                                                                                   n
                                                                                   o
                                                                                   O
                                                                                   O
                                                                                   Cfl Pd
                                                                                   H W
                                                                                   O
                                                                                   ^
                                                                                   to
     MATERIAL IN THIS SECTION SUBJECT TO CONFIDENTIALITY

    REVIEW AND IS NOT RELEASABLE AS OF FEBRUARY 1, 1982.

   FOR INFORMATION, CONTACT L. KESARI, U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL

PROTECTION AGENCY, DIVISION OF STATIONARY SOURCE ENFORCEMENT.

-------
                                   REFERENCES

                           COKE  OVEN  COMBUSTION  STACKS
 1.  World Steel Industry Data Handbook:  Vol. I.  The United States.
     McGraw-Hill Magazine.  '978.   pp. 20-25.  (Reliability No.  4.)

 2.  Technical Approach for n Coke Production Cost Model.  PEDCo
     Environmental, Inc.  EPA Contract No. 68-02-3071.  pp. 39-50.
     (Reliability No. 4.)

 3.  EPA Region V file review by GCA/Technology Division, December 1981.

 4.  Telephone conversation.  Ed Luebering, SW District Ohio EPA to Gene
     Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  March 9, 1981.  (Reliability No. 2.)

 5.  Development Document for Proposed Effluent Limitations Guidelines and
     Standards for the Iron and Steel Manufacturing Point Source Category.
     Oct. 1979.  Vol. II.  Draft Report, pp. 18-49.  (Reliability No. 4.)

 6.  Telephone conversation.  Steve Samorgin, Ohio Environmental Protection
     Agency-Southwest District to Sandy Beaton, GCA/Technology Division.
     November 1981.  (Reliability No. 2.)

 7.  Region V engineers comments to GCA questionnaire, December 1981.

 8.  Lafite, H.  Coke Plant Combustion Stack Gas Cleaning at ARMCO Steel
     Corp., Houston, Texas.  Presented at the 70th Annual Meeting of the Air
     Pollution Control Association, Toronto, Ontario.  June 20-24, 1977.
     (Reliability No. 3.)

 9.  Trenholm, Andrew R.  Study of Coke Oven Battery Stack Emission Control
     Technology-Control Methods.  Final Report-Volume II.  MRI Project No.
     4369-L(5).  March 1979.  (Reliability No. 2.)

10.  EPA Region V files.  (Renewal Permit Application dated 1/26/79—
     No. 1809010000 P013).

11.  Summary Sheets Compiled by PEDCo from stack test reports within regional
     EPA offices.  PEDCo Environmentalists, Inc.  Summary Sheets provided to
     JACA Corp. by Tom Maslarty.  JACA Files.  RACT No. 510418-510419.
     (Reliability No. 2.)
                                        344

-------
12.  Telephone conversation.  Bernard Bloom, U.S. Environmental Protection
     Agency, Division of Stationary Source Enforcement to Michael Jasinski,
     CCA/Technology Division.  December 1980.  (Reliability No. 2.)

13.  Letter from J. McGrogan, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of
     Natural Resources to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  Letter dated
     February 19, 1981.  (Reliability No. 1.)

14.  Petroccia, M., et al.  Assessment of Air Emissions from and Controls for
     Iron and Steel Making Sources - Bethlehem Steel Corporation/Burns Harbor
     Coke Batteries 1 and 2, Chesterton, Indiana.  GCA/Technology Division
     Draft Final Report TR-80-56-G.  Prepared for U.S. EPA.  July 1980.
     (Reliability No. 1.)

15.  Telephone conversation.  Andy Sunderland, Indiana State Air Pollution
     Control to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  March 3, 1981.
     (Reliability No. 2.)

16.  Telephone conversation.  Bob Clark, Pennsylvania Department of
     Environmental Resources, Ebensburg, PA to Sandy Beaton, GCA/Technology
     Division.  October 29, 1981.  (Reliability No. 2.)

17.  Report of emissions test.  No. 18 Coke Oven Battery Combustion Stack at
     Bethlehem Steel Corp./Johnstown, PA.  (Franklin Coke Plant).  Sept. 28,
     1978.  RACT No. 510411-510415.  (Reliability No. 2.)

18.  Computer printout.  Prepared by PEDCo Environmental, Inc. for U.S. EPA,
     Washington, D.C.  Coke battery data compilation for the United States.
     (Reliability No. 3.)

19.  Report of emissions tests.  No. 18 Coke Oven Battery Combustion Stack at
     Bethlehem Steel Corp./Johnstown, PA.  (Franklin Coke Plant.)  JACA
     Library.  (Reliability No. 2.)

20.  Telephone conversation.  Henry Sandonato, New York State Department of
     Environmental Conservation to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.
     February 17, 1981.  (Reliability No. 2.)

21.  Letter response.  Richard Craig, U.S. EPA Region II to William Farino,
     GCA/Technology Division.  December 1981.  (Reliability No. 1.)

22.  Telephone conversation.  Jack Hawsrath, Erie County Health Department to
     Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  February 17, 1981.  (Reliability
     No. 2.)

23.  Telephone conversation.  Mark Sylvester, Maryland State Department of
     Health and Mental Hygiene to Mike Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division.
     February 13, 1981.  (Reliability No. 2.)

24.  Telephone conversation.  Ralph Hall, Maryland State Department of Health
     and Mental Hygiene to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division.  October
     29, 1981.  (Reliability No. 2.)

                                    345

-------
  25.  Stack Test Report No.  78,  Bethlehem Steel  Corp.  Coke  Oven Underfire
      Stacks at Sparrows Pt., Maryland.   Testing by  Dept. of  Health and Mental
      Hygiene, State of Maryland.   Spring-Summer 1975.   Table 1-1  and  1-2.
      JACA Library.  (Reliability No.  1.)

  26.  Oliver, J. F. and J. T. Aanne.   Control  of Visible Emissions at  CF&I  Coke
      Plant - Pueblo,  Colorado.  JAPCA 29(9):920-25.   September 1976.
      (Reliability No. 3.)

  27.  Dion, J. A. and  G. D.  Young.   Coke  Battery Survey CF&I  Steel Corporation,
      Pueblo, Colorado, April 1979.  EPA-330/1-7-8005.   RACT  503469 [start].
      (Reliability No. 2.)

  28.  Telephone conversation.  Dennis  Myers, Colorado  State Department of
      Health to Stephen Piper, GCA/Technology  Division.  February  1981.
      (Reliability No. 2.)

  29.  EPA Region V files.   (Ford response to EPA questionnaire—2/21/78).

  30.  Nunno, Thomas, et al.  Assessment of Air Emissions from Steel Plant
      Sources.  Ford Motor Company.  River Rouge Plant  - Coke Plant
      Inspection.  GCA/Technology Division Report No.  TR-81-38-6.   Prepared for
      U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.  September  1980.   (Reliability
      No. 1.)

  31.  EPA Region V files.   (Quote to Ford for  Combustion Stack ESP—1/8/80).

,  32.  Telephone conversation.  Don  Kuh, Indiana  State  Air Pollution Control to
      Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology  Division.   March  4,  1981.   (Reliability
      No. 2.)

  33.  Inland Steel Publication:  Air,  Water and  Inland  Steel.  (Reliability
      No. 4.)

  34.  EPA Region V files.   (August  1981 letter from  Inland  to EPA.)

  35.  EPA Region V files.   (1974 permits.)

  36.  EPA Region V files.   (Interlake  Trip Report—6/80.)

  37.  Telephone conversation.  J. Sokorowski,  City of  Chicago Department of
      Inspectional Services  to Marc  Grant, GCA/Technology Division. March  5,
      1981.  (Reliability No. 2.)

  38.  Cost Effectiveness Model for  Pollution Control of Coke  Facilities.
      EPA-600/2-79-185.  August  1979.   Table 8.   (Reliability No.  4.)

  39.  Telephone conversation.  Ken  Bowman, Pennsylvania Department of
      Environmental Resources to Mike  Jasinski,  GCA/Technology Division.
      February 18, 1981.  (Reliability No. 2.)
                                          346

-------
40.  Petroccla, M. et a.l.  Assessment of Air Emissions from and Controls for
     Iron and Steelmaking Sources.  J&L Steel Corporation/Aliquippa Works.
     GCA/Technology Division Final Report No. TR-81-57-G.  Prepared for U.S.
     Environmental Protection Agency.  August 1981.  (Reliability No.l .)

41.  PADER Test Report on Coke Battery A-5 Combustion Stack at J&L Steel/
     Aliquippa Works.  Test No. 1978.  Test date June 1978.  JACA Library.
     (Reliability No. 1. )

42.  Telephone conversation.  Ted Davis, NJ2 District Ohio EPA to Gene Bergson,
     GCA/Technology Division.  February 27, 1981.  (Reliability No. 2.)

43.  EPA Region V files.  (J&L letter to EPA—4/78.)

44.  Telephone conversation.  Edward Wojciechowski, U.S. EPA Region V to Gene
     Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  February 4, 1981.  (Reliability No. 2.)

45.  Telephone conversation.  S. Banninthaya, Allegheny County Department of
     Health to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  February 12, 1981.
     (Reliability No. 2.)

46.  Devorleln, Howard.  Report on Source Tests and Visible Emission
     Observations at Kaiser Steel Corp./Fontana Works - Coke Oven Battery
     Combustion Stack "E".  RACT Box No. 510578-510670.  April 1979.
     (Reliability No. 1.)

47.  Spawn, P. D. and R. Li.  Kaiser Steel Corporation/Fontana Works - Coke
     Plant Inspection.  GCA/Technology Division Final Report. No. TR-79-53-G.
     December 1980.  Prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
     (Reliability No. 1.)

48.  Telephone conversation.  Lois Green, U.S. EPA Region IX to Michael
     Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division.  November 1981.  (Reliability No. 2.)

49.  Tomlinson, R. and D. Holtz.  Report on Source Tests, Visible Emissions,
     and Plant Observations at Kaiser Steel Corp./Fontana Works - Coke Oven
     Battery "B".  Engineering-Science, Inc., August 1979.  RACT No.
     510453-510484.  (Reliability No. 1.)

50.  Letter from Robert L. Tanlinson, Engineering-Science, Inc. to Gary
     Lavagnino, Surveillance & Analysis Division, EPA Region IX.  RE;
     Requested information for the Kaiser Steel Battery "B" Coke Oven
     Baghouse.  September 18, 1979.  RACT No. 510690.  (Reliability No. 2.)

51.  RACT No. 510416-510417.  (Reliability No. 2.)

52.  RACT No- 510421.  (Reliability No. 2.)

53.  Devorlein, H.  Report on Source Tests, Visible Emissions, and Plant
     Observations at Kaiser Steel Corp./Fontana Works - Coke Oven Battery
     "C".  Engineering-Science, Inc.  May 1979.  RACT No. 510453-510528.
     (Reliability No. 1.)

                                        347

-------
54.  Report on Source Tests,  Visible Emissions, and Plant Observations at
     Kaiser Steel Corp./Fontana Works - Coke Oven Battery "D".
     Engineering-Science, Inc.  January 1979.  RACT No. 510529-510576.
     (Reliability No. 1.)

55.  Report on Source Tests,  Visible Emissions, and Plant Observations.
     Kaiser Steel Corp./Fontana Works - Coke Oven Batteries F and G.
     Engineering-Science, Inc.  February 1980.  JACA Library and RACT No.
     510622-510681.  (Reliability No. 1.)

56.  RACT No. 511727.  (Reliability No. 2.)

57.  Telephone conversation.   John Hepola, U.S. EPA Region VI to Michael
     Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division.  November 1981.  (Reliability No. 2.)

58.  Telephone conversation.   Bernard Bloom, U.S. EPA, Washington, B.C. to
     Mike Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division.  February 1980.  (Reliability
     No. 2.)

59.  EPA Report V files.   (GLS response to EPA questionnaire—2/21/78.)

60.  EPA Region V files.   (Data supplied to EPA by GLS.)

61.  Telephone conversation.  Anton Telford, State of Illinois Environmental
     Protection Agency to Sandy Beaton, GCA/Technology Division.  October
     1981.  (Reliability No.  2.)

62.  RACT No. 512124.  (Reliability No. 2.)

63.  Spawn, P. D., et al.  National Steel Corporation, Weirton Steel Division,
     Plant Inspection, August 1981.  GCA/Technology Division Draft Final
     Report.  TR-81-118-G.  Prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection
     Agency.  November 1981.   (Reliability No. 1.)

64.  Telephone conversation.   John Raggi, West Virginia Air Pollution Control
     to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  February 27, 1981.
     (Reliability No. 2.)

65.  Letter response.  Paul Pate, Director of Jefferson County Department of
     Health to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division.  December 1981.
     (Reliability No. 1.)

66.  EPA Region V file.  (Arthur D. Little report on RCS/Chicago new coke
     battery—1978.)

67.  Telephone conversation.   Mr. Habib, Cleveland Air Pollution Control to
     Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  February 27, 1981.  (Reliability
     No. 2.)
                                        348

-------
68.  Pape, Ralph and Jim Steiner.  Particulate Matter Emission Tests for No. 1
     Coke Battery Combustion Stack at Republic Steel/Cleveland, Ohio.  Acurex
     Corporation.  Final Report No. 80-60/EE.  May 1980.  RACT No.
     510323-510410.  (Reliability No. 1.)

69.  Telephone conversation.  Sue Robertson, Alabama State Air Pollution
     Control to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division.  October 1981.
     (Reliability No. 2.)

70.  Telephone conversation.  Sue Robertson, Alabama State Air Pollution
     Control to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  February 25, 1981.
     (Reliability No. 2.)

71.  Telephone conversation.  Andy Pasko, Canton City Department of Health  to
     Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  March 5, 1981.  (Reliability
     No. 2.)

72.  EPA Region V files.  (Trip Report by Dan Bakk—2/20/80.)

73.  Spawn, P. D., et al.  Assessment of Air Emissions from and Controls for
     Iron and Steel Making Sources.  United States Steel Corp./Clairton Works
     Coke Plant in Clairton, Pennsylvania.  GCA/Technology Division, Draft
     Final Report No. TR-80-30-G.  Prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection
     Agency.  April 1980.  (Reliability No. 1.)

74.  Source Sheet on USSC/Clairton Coke Battery No. 7.  RACT No. 500478.
     (Reliability No. 1.)

75.  Source Sheet on USSC/Clairton Coke Battery No. 8.  RACT No. 500484.
     (Reliability No. 1.)

76.  Source Sheet on USSC/ClairtotuXoke Battery No. 9.  RACT No. 500490.
     (Reliability No. 1.)

77.  Test Data on USSC/Clairton, Battery No. 17.  Coke Side Shed, RACT No.
     505575-505870.  (Reliability No. 1.)

78.  Source Sheet on USSC/Clairton Coke Battery No. 15.  RACT No. 500526.
     (Reliability No. 1.)

79.  Source Sheet on USSC/Clairton Coke Battery No. 16.  RACT No. 500528.
     (Reliability No. 1.)

80.  Source Sheet on USSC/Clairton Coke Battery No. 17.  RACT No. 500541.
     (Reliability No. 1.)

81.  Source Sheet on USSC/Clairton Coke Battery No. 19.  RACT No. 500553.
     (Reliability No. 1.)

82.  Source Sheet on USSC/Clairton Coke Battery No. 20,  RACT No. 500562.
     (Reliability No. 1.)


                                       349

-------
83.  Source Sheet on USSC/Clairton Coke Battery No. 21.  RACT No. 500567.
     (Reliability No. 1.)

84.  Source Sheet on USSC/Clairton Coke Battery No. 22.  RACT No. 500581.
     (Reliability No. 1.)

85.  Letter from K. A. Elkan, General Superintendent USSC/Clairton Works to
     U.S. EPA Region III, Director of Enforcement, RE;  Compliance Emission
     Sampling Program-Battery 21 Stack (ESP outlet).  February 1980.  JACA
     Library and RACT No. 510301-510312 and 511857-511908.  (Reliability
     No. 2.)

86.  Spawn, Peter, et al.  Assessment of Mr Emissions From and Controls for
     Iron and Steel Making Sources.  USSC/Fairfield Works in Fairfield, Al.
     GCA/Technology Division Final Report No. TR-79-59-G.  Prepared for U.S.
     Environmental Protection Agency.  November 1980.  (Reliability No. 1..)

87.  Coke Battery Survey Procedures, Description, and Data Presentation.
     USSC/Fairfield Works in Fairfield, AL.  December 1977.  EPA
     330/1-77-012.  RACT No. 501519.  (Reliability No. 2.)

88.  Telephone conversation.  Veda Hampton, Jefferson County Department of
     Health to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  February 25, 1981.
     (Reliability No. 2.)

89.  PADER test of U.S. Steel Corp./Fairless Works in Fairless Hills, PA.
     October 8, 1974.  (Reliability No. 1.)

90.  EPA Region V files.  (U.S. Steel/Gary response to EPA interogatory—1979.)

91.  EPA Region V files.  (U.S. Steel/Gary Litigation Report—12/1977.)

92.  Emission Testing at U.S. Steel Corp./Gary Works in Gary, Indiana.  Coke
     Battery No. 1.  March 19, 1980.  JACA Library.  (Reliability No. 1.)

93.  Report on emission tests conducted for USSC at their Gary Works No. 2
     coke oven battery in Gary, Indiana.  Clean Air Engineering.  July 1978.
     JACA Library.  (Reliability No. 1.)

94.  Emission Testing for U.S. Steel Corp./Gary Works in Gary, Indiana.
     Kermon Environmental Services.  Test on February 6, 1980.  JACA Library.
     (Reliability No. 1.)

95.  Emission testing for U.S. Steel Corp./Gary Works in Gary, Indiana.  Coke
     Battery No. 5.  Kermon Environmental Services.  Test on November 11,
     1979.  JACA Library.  (Reliability No. 1.)

96.  Emission Testing for U.S. Steel Corp./Gary Works in Gary, Indiana.  Coke
     battery No. 7.  Kermon Environmental Services.  Test on November 5,
     1979.  JACA Library.  (Reliability No. 1.)
                                      350

-------
97.  Emission testing for U.S. Steel Corp./Gary Works in Gary, Indiana.  Coke
     Battery No. 13.  Kermon Environmental Services.  Test on January 24,
     1980.  JACA Library.  (Reliability No. 1.)

98.  Emission testing for U.S. Steel Corp./Gary Works in Gary, Indiana.  Coke
     Battery No. 15.  Kermon Environmental Services.  Test on September 30,
     1979.  JACA Library.  (Reliability No. 1.)

99.  Emission testing for U.S. Steel Corp./Gary Works in Gary, Indiana.  Coke
     Battery No. 16.  Kermon Environmental Services.  Test on November 17,
     1979.  JACA Library.  (Reliability No. 1.)

100. National Enforcement Investigation Center, U.S. Environmental Protection
     Agency Report on Plant Inspection at U.S. Steel Corp./Geneva Works.
     1977.  (Reliability No. 2.)

101. Telephone conversation.  Mr. Kopta, Utah State Air Pollution Control to
     Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  February 27, 1981.  (Reliability
     No. 2.)

102. Telephone conversation.  Tony Johnson, Pennsylvania Department of
     Environmental Resources to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.
     February 26, 1981,  (Reliability No. 2.)

103. Letter response.  Richard Thomas, Pennsylvania Department of
     Environmental Resources to Sandy Beaton, GCA/Technology Division.
     December 1981.  (Reliability No. 1.)

104. Telephone conversation and letter response.  John Raggi, West Virginia
     Air Pollution Control to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division.
     November 1981.  (Reliability No. 1.)

105. Emissions Test Report.  Submitted to Allied Chem Corp., Semet-Solvey
     Division, Ashland, Kentucky.  The Ministeir Stein System.  York Research
     Corp.  Report No. 1-9868-04.  June 7, 1979.  (Reliability No. 1.)

106. Letter response.  James Dills, Commonwealth of Kentucky Department for
     Natural Resources and Environmental Protection to Mike Jasinski,
     GCA/Technology Division.  February 26, 1982.   (Reliability No. 1.)

107. Letter response.  James Dills, Kentucky Department for Natural Resources
     and Environmental Protection to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology
     Division.  November 19, 1981.  (Reliability No. 1.)

108. Letter response.  Richard Knapp, City of St. Louis Department of Health
     to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division.  November 1981.
     (Reliability No. 1.)

109. Telephone conversation.  Richard Knapp and Tom Schippes. City of St.
     Louis Department of Health and Missouri Air Pollution Control,
     respectively to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  February 24,
     1981.  (Reliability No. 2.)

                                        351

-------
110. Telephone conversation.  Harvey Rice, Chattanooga Air Pollution Control
     Bureau to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division.  October 26, 1981.
     (Reliability No. 2.)

111. Telephone conversation.  Harvey Rice, Chattanooga Air Pollution Control
     Bureau to Michael Jasinski, GCA/Technology Division.  February 18, 1981.
     (Reliability No. 2.)

112. The Fabric Filter Newsletter.  Mcllvaine Inc. publication.  July 30,
     1980.  No. 56.  p. 5.  (Reliability No. 4.)

113. EPA Region V Files.  (Citizen Gas and Coke Data supplied to EPA in 1977.)

114. Telephone conversation.  Dave Jordan, Indianapolis Air Pollution Control
     Board to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division-  March 4, 1981.
     (Reliability No. 2.)

115. Telephone conversation.  Dave Jordan, Indianapolis Air Pollution Control
     Board to Sandy Beaton, GCA/Technology Division.  October 1981.
     (Reliability No. 2.)

116. EPA Revion V Files.  (Detroit Coke).

117. EPA Region V Files.  (Consent Decree dated 2/5/79 - Exhibit #2).

118. Telephone conversation.  Dennis Bush, NE District Ohio EPA to Gene
     Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  February 27, 1981.  (Reliability
     No. 2.)

119. Telephone conversation.  George Karp, City of Terre Haute Air Pollution
     Control to Sandy Beaton, GCA/Technology Division.  October 1982.
     (Reliability No. 2.)

120. Telephone conversation.  Ken Kearney, Indiana State Air Pollution Control
     to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  March 4, 1981.  (Reliability
     No. 2.)

121. EPA Region V Files.  (Plant Progress Report, May 1981, to EPA Region V.)

122. Telephone conversation.  Frank Phillips, Portsmouth City Health
     Department to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  February 27, 1981.
     (Reliability No. 2.)

123. RACT #503715-503716.   (Reliability No. 2.)

124. Telephone conversation.  Larry Wonders, Pennsylvania Department of
     Environmental Resources to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.
     February 17, 1981.  (Reliability No. 2.)

125. Region V Files.  (Permits - no date.)
                                        352

-------
126. EPA Region V Files.  (Acurex Report - August 1980.)

127. Telephone conversation.  Tom Doktor, Toledo Pollution Control Agency  to
     Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  February 27, 1981.   (Reliability
     No. 2.)

128. Jasinski, M. R.  Field Inspection Report of Major Air Point  Source
     Facilities in Region IV.  EPA Contract No. 68-01-4143.  Re:  Koppers  Co.,
     Inc., Woodward, Alabama Coke Plant.  Inspected by GCA on July 8 and 9,
     1980.  (Reliability No. 1.)

129. Telephone conversation.  Jerry Bevington, Wisconsin Department of Natural
     Resources to Sandy Beaton, GCA/Technology Division.  October 1981.
     (Reliability No. 2.)

130. Telephone conversation.  Jerry Bevington, Wisconsin Department of Natural
     Resources to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  March 9, 1981.
     (Reliability No. 2.)

131. Telephone conversation and letter response.  Norman Glazer,  City of
     Philadelphia Air Management to Sandy Beaton, GCA/Technology Division.
     November 1981.  (Reliability No. 2.)

132. Telephone conversation.  Robert King, City of Philadelphia Air Management
     to Gene Bergson, GCA/Technology Division.  February 13, 1981.
     (Reliability No. 2.)
                                       353

-------