EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency Office or Air Quality Planning and Standards Research Triangle Park NC 27711 EMB Report 85-CHM-8 May 1985 Air Chromium Screening Study Test Report Refuse To Energy Incinerator Baltimore Resco Baltimore, Maryland ------- EMISSION TEST REPORT METHOD DEVELOPMENT AND TESTING FOR CHROMIUM No. 2 Refuse-to-Energy Incinerator Baltimore RESCO Baltimore, Maryland ESED Project No. 85/2 EMB Report 85-CHM-8 by PEI Associates, Inc. 11499 Chester Road P.O. Box 46100 Cincinnati, Ohio 45246-0100 Contract No. 68-02-3849 Work Assignment Nos. 14, 18, and 22 PN 3615-14, 3615-18, and 3615-22 Task Manager Mr. Frank Clay Emission Standards and Engineering Division U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY EMISSION MEASUREMENT BRANCH RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NORTH CAROLINA 27711 August 1986 ------- DISCLAIMER This report was furnished to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Emission Measurement Branch, by PEI Associates, Inc., Cincinnati, Ohio, in fulfillment of Contract No. 68-02-3849, Work Assignment Nos. 14, 18, and 22. Its contents are reproduced herein as received from PEI. The opinions, findings, and conclusions are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the EPA. Mention of company or product names does not constitute endorse- ment or recommendation for use. ii ------- CONTENTS Page Figures iv Tables y Quality Assurance Element Finder vi Acknowledgment vii 1. Introduction 1-1 2. Summary and Discussion of Test Results 2-1 2.1 Test protocol 2-1 2.2 Particulate, hexavalent chromium, and arsenic test results 2-4 2.3 Particle size distribution test results 2-10 2.4 Process sample analytical results 2-16 2.5 Visible emissions and hi-volume sample 2-17 2.6 Total chromium and other metals test results 2-20 3. Quality Assurance 3-1 4. Sampling Locations and Test Procedures 4-1 4.1 Sampling location 4-1 4.2 Particulate and hexavalent chromium sample extraction and analysis 4-1 4.3 Particle size distribution 4-7 4.4 Process samples 4-9 4.5 Arsenic 4-10 5. Process Description 5-1 Appendices A Computer Printouts and Example Calculations A-l B Field Data Sheets B-l C Laboratory Data C-l D Sampling and Analytical Procedures D-l E Calibration Procedures and Results E-l F Quality Assurance Summary F-l G Project Participants and Sample Log G-l H Draft Test Method for Hexavalent Chromium Emissions From Stationary Sources H-l I Draft Protocol for Determination of Total Chromium Emissions From Stationary Sources 1-1 iii ------- FIGURES Number Page 2-1 No. 2 ESP Inlet Particle Size Distribution 2-12 2-2 No. 2 ESP Outlet Particle Size Distribution 2-13 2-3 ESP Hopper Fly Ash Sampling Location 2-18 2-4 Hi-Volume Sampler 2-19 4-1 No. 2 Incinerator ESP Inlet Sampling Location (No Scale) 4-2 4-2 No. 2 Incinerator ESP Outlet Sampling Location (No Scale) 4-3 5-1 No. 2 Incinerator Exhaust Gas Flow Schematic 5-2 IV ------- TABLES Number Page 2-1 Sampling and Analytical Parameters, No. 2 Furnace and ESP 2-2 2-2 Summary of Sample and Flue Gas Data for Particulate/Cr and Arsenic Tests 2-5 2-3 Summary of Particulate and Hexavalent Chromium Emissions Data 2-6 2-4 Summary of Arsenic Emissions Data 2-9 2-5 Comparison of Particulate Concentrations as Measured by EPA Method 5 Versus Particle Size Distribution Impactors 2-14 2-6 Process Sample Analytical Results 2-16 2-7 Summary of Total Cr Emission Data 2-21 2-8 Summary of Beryllium, Lead, and Zinc Analytical Data 2-24 3-1 Field Equipment Calibration 3-3 3-2 Example Filter and Reagent Blank Analysis for Particulate 3-4 3-3 Linear Regression Data Spectrophotometer Calibration 3-5 3-4 Results of QC Samples 3-6 3-5 QC Data for Total Chromium by NAA 3-7 ------- QUALITY ASSURANCE ELEMENT FINDER Location Section Page (1) Title page (2) Table of contents (3) Project description (4) QA objective for measurement of data in terms of precision, accuracy, completeness, repre- sentativeness, and comparability (5) Sampling procedures (6) Sample custody (7) Calibration procedures and frequency (8) Analytical procedures (9) Data reduction, validation, and reporting (10) Internal quality control checks and frequency (11) Performance and system audits and frequency (12) Preventive maintenance procedures and schedules (13) Specific routine procedures used to assess data precision, accuracy, and completeness of specific measurement parameters involved (14) Corrective action (15) Quality assurance reports to management — 1 Appendix F Section 3 Appendix D Section 4 Appendix C Appendix E Section 3 Appendix D Section 4 Appendix F Section 3 Appendix F Section 3 Appendix F Section 3 Appendix F m 1-1 F-2 D-l C-l E-l D-l F-3 F-5 F-3 F-12 Appendix F F-4 Appendix F F-ll Appendix F F-12 VI ------- ACKNOWLEDGMENT This test program was conducted for the Emission Standards and Engineer- ing Division of the EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. Mr. Frank Clay, Emission Measurement Branch (EMB) Task Manager, provided overall project coordination and guidance and Mr. Ed McCarley of EMB observed part of the test program. Mr. Ron Myers, Industrial Studies Branch (ISB) project engineer and Mr. Dwight Atkinson, representing Midwest Research Institute (MRI) (an EPA contractor), monitored process operation throughout the test period. Mr. Charles Bruffey was the PEI Project Manager. Principal authors were Messrs. Charles Bruffey and Thomas Wagner. ------- SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is currently evaluating several potentially toxic metals and their compounds. One of these toxic metals is chromium. Neither New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for stationary sources nor National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollu- tants (NESHAPS) currently include chromium emissions. Available data on the emission of chromium and its impact on air quality are limited. The Emission Measurement Branch (EMB) of EPA's Environmental Standards and Engineering Division (ESED) requires contractor assistance in obtaining representative chromium emissions data from several source categories so that an accurate assessment of the potential problems can be made and appropriate regulatory action developed. PEI Associates, Inc. (under contract to ESED-EMB) performed a series of atmospheric emission tests on the No. 2 municipal refuse incinerator operated by Signal Environmental Systems, Inc. (SES) for the city and county of Balti- more, Maryland. All testing took place during the period of May 14 through 16, 1985. Test objectives were met and no major problems were encountered during sampling or analysis. Triplicate tests were conducted simultaneously at the inlet and outlet of an electrostatic precipitator (ESP) used to control particulate emissions from the incinerator to determine the concentrations and mass emission rates of particulate matter, hexavalent chromium (Cr ), total chromium (Cr), 1-1 ------- beryllium (Be), cadmium (Cd), nickel (Ni), lead (Pb), and zinc (Zn). In addition, particle size distribution tests were conducted during the partic- ulate/chromium tests at each location, and process samples (incinerator bottom ash, and ESP hopper fly ash) were collected and analyzed for Cr , total chromium, and metals. At the completion of the particulate/chromium tests, a single test was conducted simultaneously at each location to determine the concentration and mass emission rate of inorganic arsenic. Section 2 summarizes and discusses the test results; Section 3 addresses quality assurance considerations specific to this project; Section 4 describes the sampling locations and test procedures; and Section 5 describes source operation. Appendix A presents sample calculations and computer printouts; Appendices B and C contain the field data sheets and laboratory analytical results, respectively; Appendix D details the sampling and analyt- ical procedures; Appendix E summarizes equipment calibration procedures and results; Appendix F presents a project quality assurance summary; Appendix G contains a list of project participants and a sampling log; Appendix H pre- sents the draft test method for hexavalent chromium emissions from stationary sources; and Appendix I presents the draft protocol for determining total chromium emissions from stationary sources. It should be noted that EPA performed the total chromium, cadmium, and nickel analysis of collected samples by neutron activation analysis (NAA). PEI performed the analysis for the other metals using Inductively Coupled Argon Plasma (ICAP) spectroscopy analytical techniques. 1-2 ------- SECTION 2 SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION OF TEST RESULTS This section details the results of the sampling program. Subsections are used to identify results from each test type (i.e., particulate/Cr , particle size distribution, etc.), and results are expressed in both metric and English units where applicable. 2.1 TEST PROTOCOL Table 2-1 presents the sampling and analytical protocol followed throughout this project, the test identification, and the sampling times for each specific test type. In summary, EPA Method 5* sampling trains were used for simultaneous extraction of samples from the ESP inlet and outlet test locations. Samples were collected over a 5-hour period by isokinetic, cross-sectional traverse sampling techniques. A total of six samples (three inlet and three outlet) were collected for determination of particulate and Cr concentrations. Method 5 analytical procedures were followed for the particulate analysis, and procedures re- cently developed by EPA for determination of Cr content in source emission samples were used for the Cr analysis. These latter procedures entail extraction of the sample fractions (probe residue and filter particulate) 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Reference Method 5, July 1984. 2-1 ------- TABLE 2-1. SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS, NO. 2 FURNACE AND ESP Run No. PCI-1 PCO-1 PC I -2 PCO-2 PCI-3 PCO-3 PSI-1 PSO-1 PS I -2 PSO-2 PS I -3 PSO-3 AI-1 AO-2 PCI(l-3) PCO(l-3) AI-1 AO-1 Date (1985) and tine (24-h) 5/14 - 0834-1544 5/14 - 0836-1401 5/15 - 0841-1439 5/15 - 0842-1403 5/16 - 0822-1422 5/16 - 0822-1344 5/14 - 1413-1613 5/14 - 1030-1400 5/15 - 1246-1516 5/15 - 1000-1500 5/16 - 1238-1508 5/16 - 0945-1445 5/16 - 1513-1804 5/16 - 1517-1738 5/14-16 Test or sample type Pajticulate Total Cr Particle size distribution Arsenic Process samples Incinerators bottom ash - fly ash (com- bined from 3 units) No. 2 ESP hopper fly ash Sampling location Inlet Outlet Inlet Outlet Inlet Outlet Inlet Outlet Inlet Outlet Inlet Outlet Inlet Outlet Sample parameters Particulate Methods 1-5 X X X X X X _ - - - . - . - - - Particle size dis- tribution - - - . - X X X X X X . - - - Cr+6 X X X X X X _ - - - . - _ - - - Total Cr X X X X X X . - . - . - _ - - - Arsenic Method 108 - - - . - _ - . - _ - X X Analytical parameters Partic- ulate Method 5 X X X X X X _ - . - _ - _ - - - Particle size dis- tribution - - - _ - X X X X X X _ - - - Cr+6 X X X X X X - - Total Cr by NAA X X X X X X X _ - X X Arsenic Method 108 - . - . - _ - _ - _ - X X X X Other metals by NAA X X X X X X _ . . - X - _ - X X ro i ro aAnalysis currently being performed by U.S. EPA. ------- with an alkaline solution followed by the diphenylcarbazide colorimetric method.* An analytical Cr detection limit of 0.1 microgram per gram (yg/g) was established for these samples. Particle size distribution measurements were made at each site during the particulate/Cr tests with an Andersen heavy grain loading impactor (HGLI) at the ESP inlet and an Andersen Mark III multistage impactor at the ESP outlet. Three samples were collected at each location. Particle size fractions were analyzed gravimetrically, and size distribution curves were developed for each site. At the completion of the particulate/Cr and particle size tests, a single test was conducted simultaneously at each location according to proce- dures described in EPA Reference Method 108.** Method 108 provides inorganic arsenic concentration. This test was conducted for about 2 hours at each location by isokinetic, cross-sectional traverse techniques. Total arsenic content was then determined by atomic absorption (AA) analysis. The following process samples were collected during each emission test. 0 A composite incinerator bottom ash-fly ash sample representing combined material from all three units, and 0 No. 2 ESP hopper fly ash samples. Select samples were analyzed for Cr using procedures similar to those performed on the Method 5 particulate samples. Process and emission samples were then shipped to EPA for analysis of total Cr by NAA. PEI later per- formed ICAP analysis on ESP fly ash samples for Be, Pb, and Zn. The following subsections detail the results of the sampling program. Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste. U.S. EPA SW-846, 2nd ed., July 1982. ** 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Reference Method 108, July 1984. 2-3 ------- 2.2 PARTICULATE, HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM, AND ARSENIC TEST RESULTS Simultaneous Method 5* tests were conducted at the ESP inlet and outlet test locations. These samples were analyzed for particulate and Cr concen- trations, and the resulting data were used to characterize the removal effi- ciency across the ESP. In addition, a single test was conducted simultane- ously at each location (by EPA Method 108 sampling and analytical procedures) to characterize uncontrolled and controlled arsenic emissions from this type of source. During all testing, the incinerator load was at least 80 percent of rated capacity (see Section 5). Table 2-2 summarizes pertinent sample and flue gas data for the particu- late/Cr and arsenic tests, and Table 2-3 presents the reported particulate and Cr emission results. Volumetric flow rates are expressed in cubic meters per minute (m3/min) and actual cubic feet per minute (acfm) at stack conditions. Flow rates corrected to standard conditions [20°C and 760 mmHg (68°F and 29.92 in.Hg) and zero percent moisture] are expressed as dry normal cubic meters per minute (dNm3/min) and dry standard cubic feet per minute (dscfm). Filterable particulate concentrations are expressed in milligrams per dry normal cubic meter (mg/dNm3) and grains per dry standard cubic foot (gr/dscf). Filterable particulate represents that material collected in the sample probe and on the sample filter, which were both maintained at approxi- mately 121°C (250°F). Hexavalent chromium concentrations are expressed in micrograms per gram (yg/g) and micrograms per dry normal cubic meter (yg/dNm3), where applicable. Mass emission rates are reported in kilograms per hour and pounds per hour. *40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Reference Method 5, July 1984. 2-4 ------- TABLE 2-2. SUMMARY OF SAMPLE AND FLUE GAS DATA FOR PARTICULATE/Cr+6 AND ARSENIC TESTS ro i en Run No. PCI-1 PCO-1 PC I -2 PCO-2 PC I -3 PCO-3 PCI (I Date (1985) 5/U 5/14 5/15 5/15 5/16 5/16 ilet) a\ PCO (Outlet) < AI-1 (Arsen AO-1 5/16 c) 5/16 Sampling duration, mm 300 300 300 300 300 300 erage verage 125 125 Sample volume dNm' 6.77 7.61 2.53 7.67 2.30 7.64 - - 0.97 3.10 dscf 239.228 268.673 89.164 270.671 81.325 269.762 - - 34.339 109.527 Isokinetic sampling rate, I 95.6 95.8 96.2 99.0 94.7 100.3 - - 95.7 100.6 Volumetric flow ratea Actual m'/min 6768 6284 7117 6008 6706 6006 6864 6119 6729 5913 acfm 239.000 221.900 251.300 212.150 236 .800 214.200 242,400 216.000 237,600 208.800 Standard dNmVmin 3427 3172 3639 3095 3370 3044 3479 3104 3381 2959 dscfm 121,000 112.000 128.500 109,300 119,000 107,500 122,800 109,600 119,400 104,500 Temperature "C 241 235 239 232 239 233 239 233 238 232 "F 465 455 463 449 462 452 463 452 461 449 Moisture content, % 11.3 12.0 11.4 11.6 12.2 12.7 11.6 12.1 12.4 13.1 Gas compo- sition. a X 0, 11.2 11.2 11.6 11.6 11.3 11.6 11.4 11.5 11.3 11.6 C02 7.4 7.4 7.1 7.2 8.4 8.0 7.6 7.5 8.4 8.0 CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Gas velocity mps 15.0 17.2 15.8 16.4 14.8 16.6 15.2 16.7 14.9 16.2 fps 49.2 56.3 51.7 53.8 48.7 54.3 49.9 54.8 48.9 53.0 "standard conditions: 20°C (68°F), 760 mmHg (29.94 in.Hg) and zero percent moisture. Gas composition as determined from integrated bag samples collected during each test. Analysis performed with an Orsat gas analyzer. Measured flue gas velocity In meters per second and feet per second. ------- TABLE 2-3. SUMMARY OF PARTICULATE AND HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM EMISSIONS DATA Run No. PCI-1 PCO-1 PC I -2 PCO-2 PC I -3 PCO-3 Date (1985) 5/14 5/14 5/15 5/15 5/16 5/16 Filterable concentration Total filterable weight, grams 21.188 0.0374 7.07 0.0316 6.849 0.0253 Participate3 mg/dNm3 3130 4.9 2795 4.1 2978 3.3 gr/dscf 1.4 0.002 1.2 0.0018 1.3 0.0014 wg/g <0.1 NA <0.1 NA <0.1 NA Cr ° (blank corrected)" Total Cr+6 in sample, ug <0.5 NA <0.5 NA <0.5 NA ug/dNm3 . - _ - _ ~ Mass emission rate Particulate kg/h 643 0.95 611 0.8 601 0.6 Ib/h 1418 2.1 1348 1.7 1325 1.3 Ci kg/h .+6 Ib/h Collection efficiency, % Particulate >QQ R CrTO Participate . concentration in gr/dscf corrected to 12% COj 2.27 0.003 2.03 0.003 1.86 0.002 ro 01 aStandard conditions: 20°C (68°F), 760 mmHg (29.94 in.Hg) and zero percent moisture. A Cr detection limit of 0.1 ug/g was established for these samples based on a particulate weight of 5 grams using 50 ml total volume. Election efficiency: Inlet concentration -^tlet^ncentration , 10Q L12 12C where C,, = corrected concentration C = uncorrected concentration % CO. = as measured by Orsat gas analyzer NA - Not analyzed. ------- As reported in Table 2-2, sample volumes ranged from 2.30 to 6.77 dNm3 for the inlet trains and from 7.61 to 7.67 dNm3 for the outlet trains. The inlet sample rate was adjusted after Test PCI-1 to account for the heavy particulate loading at this site. The particulate filter was changed four times during this run to prevent excessive pressure drop across the filter frit support. Tests PCI-2 and PCI-3 were run at substantially lower sampling rates to preclude excessive pressure drop and filter changes during testing. No problems were encountered during Runs 2 and 3 and sufficient sample (>5 grams) was collected for Cr quantification. Isokinetic sampling rates ranged between 94.7 and 100.3 percent, which is within the acceptable range of 90 to 110 percent. Volumetric gas flow rates at the ESP inlet ranged from 6706 to 7117 m3/min (236,800 to 251,300 acfm) and averaged 6864 m3/min (242,400 acfm) for the three particulate/Cr tests. The average volumetric flow at standard conditions was 3479 dNm3/min (122,800 dscfm). Flue gas temperatures ranged from 239° to 241°C (462° to 465°F) and averaged 239°C (463°F). The moisture content of the gas stream averaged 11.6 percent, and the average oxygen (Op) and carbon dioxide (COp) contents were 11.4 and 7.6 percent, respectively. Arsenic sample and flue gas data reported in Table 2-2 are comparable to data associated with the particulate/Cr tests with the exception of the sample times and metered gas volume. As shown in Table 2-3, inlet particulate concentrations ranged from 2795 to 3130 mg/dNm3 (1.2 to 1.4 gr/dscf) and averaged 2968 mg/dNm3 (1.3 gr/dscf). The average mass emission rate for the three tests was 618 kg/h (1364 Ib/h). As reported in Table 2-3, hexavalent chromium content of the inlet emission samples was less than 0.1 pg/g, or below the detection limit of the 2-7 ------- analytical methodology employed. Because of the extended sampling times and heavy participate concentration at this location, loose participate in gram quantities was collected in the front half of each Method 5 sampling train. Considering the extremely low levels of Cr indicated by the pretest survey sample analysis (<0.25 yg/g), the filters were not cut up and extracted as specified in the method. This precluded the need for a filter blank correc- tion for Cr . Rather, the loose particulate was thoroughly mixed with a Teflon spatula and approximately 5 grams of the particulate was transferred to the beaker containing the probe rinse particulate residue. To increase the analytical sensitivity (0.1 yg/g), the amount of alkaline extraction solution and the final dilution volume were kept at a minimum consistent with Method 3060 from Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste.* This proportion is 4 ml of extraction solution per gram of solid diluted to a final volume of 10 ml. Filters would require larger amounts of extraction solution resulting in increased analytical detection limits (>1.0 yg/g). At the ESP outlet, volumetric gas flow rates ranged from 6006 to 6284 m3/min (214,200 to 221,900 acfm) and averaged 6119 m3/min (216,000 acfm). The average gas flow rate at standard conditions was 3104 dNm3/min (109,600 dscfm). Flue gas temperatures ranged from 232° to 241°C (449° to 465°F) and averaged 233°C (452°F). The moisture content of the gas stream averaged 12.1 percent, and the average 02 and COp contents were 11.5 and 7.5 percent, respectively. Outlet particulate concentrations ranged between 3.3 and 4.9 mg/dNm3 (0.0014 and 0.002 gr/dscf) and averaged 4.1 mg/dNm3 (0.0017 gr/dscf). The average mass emission rate for the three tests was 0.8 kg/h (1.7 Ib/h). United States Environmental Protection Agency, SW846, 2nd ed., July 1982. 2-8 ------- Since Cr levels in the ESP inlet samples were less than detectable, no attempt was made to analyze the ESP outlet participate samples for Cr . The particulate-removal efficiency of the ESP was greater than 99.8 percent based on the measured inlet and outlet particulate concentrations. No major problems were encountered during the particulate/Cr tests. Extended sampling times were necessary to assure collection of sufficient loose particulate sample at the ESP inlet so that Cr levels could be quan- tified. It should be noted that one of the six sampling ports at the ESP outlet location was not accessible for sampling because of an I-beam support approximately 4 feet directly in front of the port opening. Each of the remaining 5 sampling ports was sampled using 5 points per port for a total of 25 sampling points. The effect on sample results is believed to be insignif- icant considering the low particulate weights and extended sampling times. Table 2-4 summarizes the arsenic emissions data obtained at this source. TABLE 2-4. SUMMARY OF ARSENIC EMISSIONS DATA Run No. AI-1 AO-1 Date (1985) 5/16 5/16 Sampling location Inlet Outlet Concentration Total3 arsenic sample weight, yg 162.7 13.1 yg/dNm3 167.7 4.2 mg/dNm3 0.17 0.004 Arsenic collection efficiency, % >97 aProbe rinse residue, filter and impinger catch. The inlet sample showed a total arsenic weight of 162.7 yg or 167.7 vg/dNm3 compared with 13.1 yg (4.2 yg/dNm3) for the outlet sample. This single test indicated an arsenic collection efficiency of more than 97 per- cent. Considering the low level of arsenic measured, and based on a single 2-9 ------- test, this calculated efficiency is comparable to the overall participate collection efficiency of the ESP. 2.3 PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION TEST RESULTS At the ESP inlet, an Andersen HGLI with a 15-ym precutter attached was used to measure particle size distribution during each particulate/Cr test. This in-stack impactor consists of two single-jet impaction chambers followed by a third-stage cyclone and a backup thimble. The impactor is designed for use in extracting samples from a gas stream with a heavy particulate concen- tration and its use was advantageous in this case because it contains no filter media (except the backup thimble). This eliminates the need for filter blank corrections for Cr and permits a more accurate quantification of Cr size distribution. A total of three inlet samples (designated PSI) were collected during 120- to 150-minute periods at a single point repre- senting the average gas velocity and temperature in the duct. At the ESP outlet, an Andersen Mark III in-stack impactor was used to measure size distribution during the particulate/Cr tests. The Mark III impactor consists of eight stages and a backup filter from which eight cut- point sizes can be determined. Three samples (designated PSO) were collected from a single point repre- senting the average velocity head and temperature in the duct. Sample times ranged from 210 to 300 minutes. Each particle size test was conducted according to the procedures described in the impactor operations manuals. Isokinetic sampling rates were set initially, and constant cut-point characteristics were maintained throughout the sampling period. Specifications state that the gas flow rate 2-10 ------- through the impactor at stack conditions should be maintained between 0.3 and 0.7 acfm to avoid distortion of individual stage cut-points. With the excep- tion of Test PSO-2, which exhibited a 0.71 cfm impactor flow rate, this criterion was met. Isokinetic sampling rates ranged from 99.6 to 103.9 percent for the inlet tests and 103.1 to 106 percent for the outlet tests. Cumulative size distribution curves representing the total weight of particulate matter smaller than the indicated aerodynamic particle diameter [in micrometers (ym)] were established for each test location. Data reduc- tion for all runs were performed by computer programming with moisture, molecular weight, and temperature data obtained from the particulate/Cr tests. The cut-points for the HGLI tests were determined graphically from information supplied by the manufacturer, and all particle size results are based on a particle density of 1 g/cm3. The HGLI data reduction and inter- mediate calculations are presented in Appendix A of this report. Cut-points for the Mark III impactor stages were calculated by use of a computer program contained in "A Computer-Based Cascade Impactor Data Reduc- tion System" (CIDRS) developed for EPA by Southern Research Institute (SRI).* All particle size results are based on a particle density of 1 g/cm3. Figures 2-1 and 2-2 present the best-fit nominal curves for the inlet and outlet particle size distribution tests. Table 2-5 presents a comparison of particulate concentrations obtained from the particle size tests with those obtained by Method 5 tests. For the three inlet runs (PSI-1 through -3), the size distribution curve showed that about 40 percent by weight of the particles had a nominal * Southern Research Institute. A Computer-Based Cascade Impactor Data Reduc- tion System. Prepared for U.S. EPA under Contract No. 68-022-131, March 1978. 2-11 ------- ro ro 10.0 PARTICLE SIZE, micrometers 100 Figure 2-1. No. 2 ESP inlet particle size distribution. ------- ro i ~n l.Q 10.0 PARTICLE SIZE, micrometers 100 Figure 2-2. No. 2 ESP outlet particle size distribution. ------- TABLE 2-5. COMPARISON OF PARTICULATE CONCENTRATIONS AS MEASURED BY EPA METHOD 5 VERSUS PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION IMPACTORS Run No. PSI-1 PCI-1 PSI-2 PCI-2 PSI-3 PCI-3 PSO-1 PCO-1 PSO-2 PCO-2 PSO-3 PCO-3 Test location ESP inlet ESP outlet Sample type Particle size - HGLI Method 5 - Parti cul ate Particle size - HGLI Method 5 - Parti cul ate Particle size - HGLI Method 5 - Particulate Particle size Method 5 - Particulate Particle size Method 5 - Particulate Particle size Method 5 - Particulate Particulate concentration mg/dNm3 2515 3130 1756 2795 2206 2978 2.99 4.9 3.0 4.1 2.87 3.3 gr/dscf 1.1 1.4 0.8 1.2 1.0 1.3 0.0013 0.002 0.0013 0.0018 0.00125 0.0014 2-14 ------- diameter of 15 micrometers or less. The calculated average participate concentration for these runs was 2159 mg/dNm3 (0.97 gr/dscf) compared with a three-test Method 5 average of 2968 mg/dNm3 (1.3 gr/dscf). This indicates about a 25 percent difference in average values between the two measurements. The percentage difference between the methods is acceptable according to the applicable criterion in the Inhalable Particulate (IP) protocol.* This protocol states that a comparison of the total mass concentrations between particle size and Method 5 sample runs should not differ from the means by more than 50 percent. The HGLI Stages 1, 2, and 3 cut-points for Test PSI-1 were 13.0, 6.9, and 2.4 ym, respectively. Seventeen percent of the particles were less than 13.0 ym, 14 percent were less than 6.9 pm, and 12.5 percent were less than 2.4 ym. The stage cut-points for Test PSI-2 were 13.0, 6.9, and 2.2 ym. Thirty-four percent of the particles were less than 13.0 ym, 31 percent were less than 6.9 ym, and 28 percent were less than 2.2 ym. The stage cut-points for Test PSI-3 were identical to those of Test PSI-1. Twenty-one percent of the particles were less than 13 ym, 19 percent less than 6.9 ym, and 16 percent less than 2.4 ym. The size distribution curves for the three outlet tests (PSO-1 through -3) showed between 60 and 70 percent by weight of the particles had a nominal diameter of 10 ym or less. Approximately 45 percent of the particles were less than 2 ym. The average calculated particulate concentration for these runs was 2.94 mg/dNm3 (0.0013 gr/dscf) compared with a three-test Method 5 average of 4.1 mg/dNm3 (0.0017 gr/dscf). * Procedures Manual for Inhalable Particulate Samplers Operation, prepared by Southern Research Institute for EPA, Contract No. 68-02-3118, November 1979. 2-15 ------- The inlet results are considered representative of particle size dis- tribution in the gas stream at the time of testing. The overall data con- sistency and comparability to the average Method 5 results substantiate this conclusion. The outlet results are somewhat suspect because of the extremely low particulate concentration. Some distortion in stage cut-points is also expected as a result of physical forces such as static electricity. However, the data are comparable and correlate favorably with the Method 5 test re- sults. Based on the nondetectable levels of Cr at this source, no attempt was made to quantify Cr by size fraction. 2.4 PROCESS SAMPLE ANALYTICAL RESULTS Table 2-6 summarizes Cr analytical results from the composite incin- erator bottom ash-fly ash, and ESP hopper fly ash samples. TABLE 2-6. PROCESS SAMPLE ANALYTICAL RESULTS Sample type Incinerator bottom ash (composite) ESP hopper fly ash No. 4 field (5/14) No. 4 field (5/15) No. 4 field (5/16) Labora- tory ID EL143-145 - EL155 EL156 EL157 Particu- late weight analyzed, g 10.1712 - 10.0836 10.0297 10.0133 Total Cr+6, yg <1 - <1 <1 <1 Cr concen- tration, yg/g <0.1 - <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Detection limit: 0.1 yg/g. Samples of the combined bottom ash-ESP fly ash were collected each test day from a vibrating screen conveyor immediately prior to being loaded into 2-16 ------- trucks for disposal in a landfill. This material represented a nonhomogene- ous mixture of bottom ash and ESP fly ash from each of the three units at this facility. Grab samples were collected 4 to 6 times over a 5-hour test period and placed in a 1-gallon polyethylene container. Samples from each test day were composited into a single sample and analyzed for Cr using procedures similar to those used in the analysis of the inlet Method 5 sam- ples. Cr content in this sample was less than the detection limit (<0.1 ug/g). Samples of the No. 2 ESP hopper fly ash were collected from each of four ESP fields during each test day. Figure 2-3 depicts the sampling location. Only samples collected from the No. 4 field were analyzed for Cr . The Cr level in these samples was less than detectable (<0.1 wg/g). 2.5 VISIBLE EMISSIONS AND HI-VOLUME SAMPLE As instructed by EPA, PEI attempted to collect sufficiently large quan- tities of particulate at the ESP outlet so that Cr and other metals of interest could be quantified. Pretest calculations revealed that sampling times in excess of 30 hours, using a hi-volume sampler, would be required to collect s750 mg from this source. A hi-volume ambient air sample pump and filter were used as shown in Figure 2-4. However, the sample runs were terminated with less than 2i hours of sample time due to overheating of the pump motor. Sample volumes corrected to standard conditions for these runs were 433 and 665 dNm3 (1419 and 2183 dscf), respectively. No attempt was made to analyze these samples based on the analytical results for Cr from the inlet and process samples. 2-17 ------- A SIDE B SIDE MAIN ASH CONVEYOR MAIN INCINERATOR BUILDING 1 ESP f 2 IELD 3 4 MAIN O STACK GAS FLOW Figure 2-3. ESP hopper fly ash sampling location. 2-18 ------- ro vo STACK WALL MANOMETER ICE BATH H RECIRCULATION Figure 2-4. Hi-volume sampler. ------- 2.6 TOTAL CHROMIUM AND OTHER METALS TEST RESULTS Table 2-7 summarizes total Cr concentration and emission data for sam- ples analyzed by NAA. Analytical data as received from EPA are included in Appendix C of this report along with example calculations. Table 2-8 summa- rizes Be, Pb, and Zn concentration data for process samples analyzed using ICAP techniques. As reported in Table 2-7, inlet Method 5 tests designated PCI-1 through -3 and outlet Method 5 tests designated PCO-1 through -3 were submitted for analysis. In addition, inlet particle size run PSI-3 was submitted for analysis by individual stage cut point. Process samples (fly ash/bottom ash and ESP fly ash) were also analyzed for total Cr. The total Cr content of the inlet emission samples ranged between 657 and 861 yg/g. Total Cr concentrations ranged between 1836 and 2695 yg/dNm3, with corresponding mass emission rates ranging between 0.40 and 0.55 kg/h (0.90 and 1.04 Ib/h). The total Cr content of the outlet emission samples ranged between 2807 and 7545 yg/g. The total Cr concentration ranged between 11.6 and 27.3 yg/dNm3, with corresponding mass emission rates of 0.002 and 0.005 kg/h (0.005 and 0.01 Ib/h), respectively. All outlet total Cr data have been corrected for a filter/acetone Cr blank level of 15 yg. These data indicate that the total Cr collection efficiency of the ESP is about 99 percent on a mass rate basis. A single particle size sample from the ESP inlet was analyzed by indi- vidual stages in an attempt to characterize total Cr by size fraction. As reported in Table 2-7, the total Cr content of individually-loaded stages ranged from 330 ug for Stage 1, 13 ym cut point, to 139 yg for Stage 3, 2.4 cut point. 2-20 ------- TABLE 2-7. SUMMARY OF TOTAL Cr EMISSION DATA (Baltimore RESCO) ro i ro Run No. PC1-1 PC I -2 PC1-3 PCO-1 PCO-2 PCO-3 PSI-3 PSI-3 1SI-3 1SI-3 PSI-3 1-3 (PCI and PCO 1) (PCI and PCO 2) Sample type and location Participate - ESP inlet Participate - ESP inlet Paniculate - ESP inlet Paniculate - ESP outlet Particulate - ESP outlet Particulate - ESP outlet Particle size - ESP inlet Stage 0 Particle size - ESP inlet Stage 1 Particle size - ESP inlet Stage 2 Particle size - ESP inlet Stage 3 Particle size - ESP inlet Backup thimble Fly ash/bottom ash Composite ESP fly ash - Field 1 ESP fly ash - Field 2 ESP fly ash - Field 3 ESP fly ash - Field 4 ESP - fly ash - Field 1 ESP - fly ash - Field 2 ESP - fly ash - Field 3 ESP - Fly ash - Field 4 Total8 participate collected, g 21.1876 7.0703 6.8494 0.0374 0.0316 0.0253 1.3899 0.4523 0.0634 0.0606 0.3725 - - - Particulate sample weight analyzed by NAA, g 0.0991 0.1059 0.1097 0.0374 0.0316 0.0253 0.0962 0.1022 0.0433 0.0405 0.3725 0.1278 0.098 0.1087 0.1038 0.1081 0.1012 0.1134 0.1257 0.1193 Total Crc results by NAA, Mg 85.3 69.6 74.0 208.1 88.7 190.9 61.1 74.6 96.1 93.1 166.4 56.4 67.9 65.0 72.3 40.0 75.7 85.6 81.5 54.9 Total Crd concen- tration by NAA. W9/9 861 657 675 5,564 2,807 7,545 635 730 2,219 2,299 447 441 693 598 697 370 748 755 648 460 Total Cre content of emission sample, v9 18,243 4,645 4,623 208.1 88.7 190.9 883' 330 141 139 166.4 56.4 67.9 65.0 72.3 40.0 75.7- 85.6 81.5 54.9 Total Cr concentration, wg/dNm3 2.695 1,836 2,010 27.3 11.6 25.0 833 311 133 131 157 - - - ' gr/dscf 0.001 0.0008 0.0009 0.00001 0.000005 0.00001 0.0004 0.0001 0.00006 0.00006 0.00007 - - - Total Cr mass emission rate. kg/h 0.55 0.40 0.41 0.005 0.002 0.005 0.22 0.06 0.03 0.03 0.03 - - - Ib/h 1.04 0.90 0.92 0.01 0.005 0.01 0.40 0.14 0.06 0.06 0.07 - - - (continued) ------- TABLE 2-7 (continued) ro I ro ro Run No. PCI and PCO-3 Sample type and location ESP - Fly ash - Field 1 ESP - Fly ash - Field 2 ESP - Fly ash - Field 3 ESP - Fly ash - Field 4 Total3 participate collected, 9 i Participate sample weight analyzed by NAA, g 0.1066 0.0923 0.0989 0.1238 Total Crc results by NAA, ug 80.8 70.5 55.6 32.9 Total Crd concen- tration by NAA, W9/9 758 764 562 266 Total Cre content of emission sample, ug 80.8 70.5 55.6 32.9 Total Cr concentration. ug/dNm3 - gr/dscf - Total Cr mass emission rate, kg/h - Ib/h - aTotal particulate (acetone rinse residue and filter) collected during sample run. Particulate weight analyzed by MM. cTotal Cr results by NAA. Run No. PCO/T (ESP outlet) is a blank corrected value (=15 ug Cr for filter/acetone blank). tide size thimble (backup) values have been blank corrected for =44 yg Cr. dTotal Cr(C) divided by particulate weight analyzed by NAA(b). eTotal Cr concentration (vg/g) multiplied by total particulate weight collected(a). Par- ------- The backup thimble (less than 2.4 ym) showed 166 yg total Cr. This figure has been blank corrected by 44 yg to account for the background levels of Cr in the thimble filter. On a concentration basis, Stage 1 (13.0 ym cut point) was 311 yg/dNm3, Stage 2 (6.9 ym cut point) was 133 yg/dNm3, Stage 3 (2.4 ym cut point) was 131 yg/dNm3, and the backup stage (less than 2.4 ym) was 157 yg/dNm3. These data indicate a fairly uniform distribution of total Cr of less than 13 ym in diameter. The composite fly ash/bottom ash sample showed 441 yg/g total Cr. ESP fly ash samples showed total Cr concentrations ranging between 266 and 764 yg/g. It should be noted that EPA attempted to quantify Ni and Cd by NAA. All samples showed nondetectable levels of Ni, and only one process sample (ESP fly ash) showed any Cd at a level of 301 yg/g. Table 2-8 is a summary of Be, Pb, and Zn concentration data. Single composite samples of incinerator bottom ash and ESP fly ash from each test period were analyzed using ICAP techniques. Sample preparation procedures generally followed those described in EPA Method 3050 of SW-846.* This analysis was performed in July 1986. Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste. U.S. EPA SW-846, 2nd ed, July 1982, Method 3050. 2-23 ------- TABLE 2-8. SUMMARY OF BERYLLIUM, LEAD, AND ZINC ANALYTICAL DATA Sample type Bottom ash ESP fly ash, Field No. 4 Test No. 1 2 3 1 2 3 Laboratory No. EL 143 EL 144 EL 145 EL 155 EL 156 EL 157 Concentration, yg/g (as received) Be <0.07 <0.07 <0.07 <0.07 <0.07 <0.07 Pb 1,450 1,640 1,500 10,825 2,820 7,608 Zn 5,260 5,940 4,790 82,600 91,200 97,200 2-24 ------- SECTION 3 PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE The application of quality assurance procedures to source emission measurements ensures accurate emission-testing results. Quality assurance guidelines provide the detailed procedures and actions necessary for defining and producing acceptable data. In this project, five documents were used in the preparation of a source-specific test plan that would ensure the collec- tion of acceptable data: 1) the EPA Quality Assurance Handbook Volume II, EPA-600/4-77-0271; 2) the PEI Emission Test Quality Assurance Plan; 3) the PEI Laboratory Quality Assurance Plan; 4) Determination of Hexavalent Chromi- um Emissions From Stationary Sources, December 13, 1984; and 5) EPA Protocol for Emissions Sampling for Both Hexavalent and Total Chromium, February 22, 1985. Two of these are PEI's general guideline manuals and define the com- pany's standard operating procedures followed by the company's emission testing and laboratory groups. In this specific test program, which was reviewed by EPA's Emission Measurement Branch, the following steps were taken to ensure that the testing and analytical procedures produced quality data: 0 A sample of the combination bottom ash-ESP fly ash yas obtained during the April pretest survey and analyzed for Cr 6 content. These data were used to Define sampling times and rates so that a quantifiable level of Cr 6 was collected. 0 Calibration of all field sampling equipment. 0 Checks of train configuration and calculations. 3-1 ------- 0 Onsite quality assurance checks, such as leak checks of the sam- pling train, pitot tube, and Orsat line and onsite quality assur- ance checks of all test equipment prior to use. 0 Use of designated analytical equipment and sampling reagents. 0 Internal and external audits to ensure accuracy in sampling and analysis. Table 3-1 lists the specific sampling equipment used to perform the particulate/Cr , particle size distribution, and arsenic tests as well as the calibration guidelines and limits. In addition to the pre- and post-test calibrations, a field audit was performed on the metering systems and temper- ature-measurement devices used during sampling. These data are summarized in Table 3-1, and copies of the field audit data sheets are presented in Appen- dix B of this report. The PEI project manager performed the onsite sample calculations, and computer programming was used to validate the data upon return to PEI's Cincinnati laboratory. Minor discrepancies between the hand calculations and computer printouts are due primarily to rounding off of values. Computerized example calculations are presented in Appendix A. The following subsections summarize the quality assurance activities performed during the analytical phase of this project. As a check of the gravimetric analytical procedure, blank filter and reagent (acetone) were analyzed in a fashion similar to that used for the actual field samples. Table 3-2 summarizes the blank analysis data. These data indicate good analytical technique. Emission and process samples were analyzed in four separate batches. Table 3-3 summarizes the linear regression data of the spectrophotometer calibration for the four days. The detection limit established for the four days was less than 0.004 pg/ml for an absorbance of 0.005 above the linear regression intercept. 3-2 ------- TABLE 3-1. FIELD EQUIPMENT CALIBRATION Equipment Meter box Pi tot tube Digital Indicator Thermocouple and stack thermometer Orsat analyzer Impinger thermometer Trip balance Barometer Dry gas thermometer Probe nozzle ID No. FB-3 FB-8 FB-11 FB-12 187 522 220 262 104 257 141 1-1 1-5 Mettler No. 743985 227 FB-3 FB-8 FB-11 FB-12 5-108 5-105 3-111 A-l Calibrated against Wet test meter Standard pilot tube Millivolt signals ASTM-3F Standard gas ASTM-3F Type S weights NBS traceable barometer ASTM-3F Calf per Allowable error AHP ±0.15 (Y ±0.5% Y post-test) Cp ±0.01 0.5% 1.5* (±2% saturated) ±0.5% ±2°F tO. 5 g ±0.10 in.Hg (0.20 post-test) ±5°F On ±0.004 In. Actual error 4H0: +0.02; Y: 0.7% 4H@: -0.06; Y: -1.0% AH0: -0.04; Y: -1.3% AHP: 0 Y: + 1.7% 0 0 -0.45* +0.41% +0.38% +0.19% +0.2% (0,) -0.2% (C02) +1°F +1°F <0.1 g 0.01 In: +2°F; Out: +2°F In: +4°F: Out: +3°F In: +1°F; Out: +4°F In: +1"F; Out: 0°F 0.001 0.004 0.00 0.001 Within allowable limits X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Comments Y •= 0.986; Audit AH0 = 1.86 Y = 1.006; Audit AHP = 1.90 Y •= 1.058; Audit AH@ = 1.20 Y = 0.954; Audit AHP = 1.07 (Field audit results) From Geometric Spec. 40 CFR Appendix A; Reference Method 2 (0.84 coefficient assumed) Maximum deviation Maximum deviation Audit value 02 and CO., * 5.0% Maximum deviation Maximum deviations Maximum deviations Maximum deviations Maximum deviations u> co ------- TABLE 3-2. EXAMPLE FILTER AND REAGENT BLANK ANALYSIS FOR PARTICIPATE Sample type and filter number Participate - 8510128 Reeve Angel 934 AH Acetone blank3 Water blank Original tare weight, mg 363.8 99530.6 NAC Blank weight, mg 364.2 99534.1 NA Net weight, mg 0.4 3.5 mgb (0.032 mg/g) NA 137 ml evaporated and desiccated before weighing. DMethod 5 and particle size acetone blank (0.01 mg/g used in calculations). CNA = Not applicable. 3-4 ------- TABLE 3-3. LINEAR REGRESSION DATA SPECTROPHOTOMETER CALIBRATION Sample description Process sam- ples PCI-3 PCI-1 PCI-1 + spike PCI-2 PCI-3 + duplicate Date (1985) 5/22 6/5 6/11 6/12 Cr+6 standard concen- tration, yg/ml 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 Absorb- ance 0.000 0.136 0.267 0.403 0.537 0.656 0.000 0.130 0.262 0.390 0.522 0.656 0.000 0.130 0.262 0.386 0.513 0.632 0.000 0.128 0.263 0.401 0.532 0.663 Y-Intercept 0.0032 0.0008 0.0039 -0.0020 Slope 1.3197 1.3097 1.2666 1.3329 Correlation coefficient 0.99982 0.99998 0.99986 0.99995 3-5 ------- Because the concentration of hexavalent chromium in these solid samples were extremely low, the amount of alkaline extraction solution and the final dilution volume of this extract were kept at a minimum consistent with Method 3060 from Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste.* This proportion is 4 ml of alkaline extraction solution per gram of solid diluted to a final volume of 10.ml. All reagent blanks were less than the detection limit. No other blanks were necessary because all analyses were performed on loose particulate; i.e., no filter or thimbles were extracted. Duplicate analysis (extraction and colorimetric determination) was performed on the inlet particulate of Run 3. Also, the inlet particulate from Run 1 was checked by method of addition. The results for these samples are presented in Table 3-4. TABLE 3-4. RESULTS OF QC SAMPLES Sample Particulate Run 3 Particulate Run 1 QC type Duplicate Spike Results 0.15, <0.1 yg/g 94% recovery One problem was encountered with the analysis of the inlet particulate samples and the composite bottom ash samples. After the alkaline extract was filtered, the samples were slightly cloudy (white opaqueness). This inter- fered with the colorimetric determination and the absorbance of an aliquot not containing the color reagent was subtracted from the absorbance of the sample to correct for this interferent. Arsenic samples were analyzed on June 4, 1985. The least square fit of the data to quadratic equations for the graphite furnace atomic absorption calibration gave a correlation coefficient of 0.9990. The results of blank analyses were 8.56 pg for the filter and <0.006 mg/liter (detection limit) 3-6 ------- for the rinse and impinger samples. The filter blank value is typical for glass fiber filters. Duplicate analysis of the bomb fraction and rinse fraction for the outlet runs gave 3.26, 4.48, 4.91, and 4.61 yg, respec- tively. Spike recoveries were 95.4, 92.1, 101.9, and 0 percent for the filter, rinse, impingers, and bomb fractions, respectively. Table 3-5 presents QC data relative to the total Cr analysis by NAA. Duplicate, audit, and blank data are presented. TABLE 3-5. QC DATA FOR TOTAL CHROMIUM BY NAA Sample test type Test No. PCI-1 (acetone residue/particulate sample) NBS coal fly ash NBS fly ash Alkaline extract Type I H20 Method 5 filter/acetone Particle size thimble - backup Analysis Duplicate analysis Audit Audit Blank Blank Blank Blank Results total Cr 85.3/106.9 yg 182.8 yg/g (196 yg/g accepted) 32.2 yg/g (34.4 yg/g accepted) Not detected Not detected 15.0 yg 44.0 yg 3-7 ------- SECTION 4 SAMPLING LOCATIONS AND TEST PROCEDURES This section describes the sampling sites and the test methods used to characterize participate and chromium emissions from Incinerator No. 2. 4.1 SAMPLING LOCATION Flue gas samples were extracted from existing sampling ports prior to and after the ESP that controls particulate emissions from Incinerator No. 2. Figures 4-1 and 4-2 show the test locations. At the ESP inlet, five 10-cm (4-in.) i.d. sampling ports were located approximately 2.9 equivalent duct diameters (EDO) downstream and 2 EDO up- stream from the nearest flow disturbances in a rectangular duct with an i.d. of 2.1 x 3.7 m (6.75 x 12 ft). At the ESP outlet, six 10-cm (4-in.) i.d. sampling ports were located approximately 4.2 EDO downstream and 0.8 EDO upstream of the nearest flow disturbances in a rectangular duct with an i.d. of 3.1 x 2.0 m (10 ft 2i in. x 6 ft 5i in.). Both locations conformed to the minimum requirements for sampling port locations specified in EPA Reference Method 1.* 4.2 PARTICULATE AND HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM SAMPLE EXTRACTION AND ANALYSIS Flue gas samples were simultaneously collected at the ESP inlet and outlet test locations according to procedures outlined in EPA Reference Method 5.** 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Reference Method 1, July 1984. 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Reference Method 5, July 1894. 4-1 ------- TO ESP/ / TO ESP/ o M8m(]ft) | t GAS FLOW ° "f'V") , fUW " 1 5.2 m t 7.6m -1 » O ft) I HEAT RECOVERY BOILER \ (17ft> (25ft) J_ F3x» LEVEL ELEVATION < ^ mn ft\ DUST ASPIRATION 3 .3^mU ft) ^.SYSTEM *** >/ (DAMPER CLOSED DURING TESTING) n i *GASFLOW 37mM-ft) \ ' \ 1 5.2m ,, 7.6m (17ft) (25ft) HEAT RECOVERY BOILER TOP VIEH Figure 4-1. No. 2 incinerator ESP inlet sampling location (no scale) 4-2 ------- 90° BEND FROM ESP GAS CO FLOW CROSS-SECTION *10m ( 33ft) m (10 ft) .508 m(l ft 8 in.) m (10 ft 2/2 1n«) »2.0 m (6 ft.S1^ in.) \ U U D LJ LJ U 6-10 cm(4 in.) i.d. SAMPLE PORTS *PORT INACCESSIBLE I |(NOT SAMPLED) o o o o r— o o PORT INACCESSIBLE(NOT SAMPLED) 1.8 m (6 ft) Figure 4-2. No. 2 incinerator ESP outlet sampling location (no scale). ------- Initially, the collected samples were analyzed gravimetrically by Method 5 to determine participate concentration and mass emission rates. At the completion of the gravimetric analysis, the inlet samples were prepared and analyzed for Cr according to procedures described in a draft EPA method en- titled "Determination of Hexavalent Chromium Emissions From Stationary Sources." A copy of the draft method is contained in Appendix H of this report. Before sampling began, velocity, static pressure, molecular weight, moisture content, and temperature were measured to define sampling rates and nozzle sizes are described in EPA Reference Methods 1 through 4.* The degree of turbulent flow at each location also was assessed according to procedures described in EPA Reference Method 2.* In this method, the face opening of the Type-S pitot tube is aligned perpendicularly to the duct cross-sectional plane, designated "0-degree reference." Null (zero) pitot readings obtained at a 0-degree reference indicate an acceptable flow condition at a given point. If the pitot reading is not zero at 0-degree reference, the pitot is rotated (up to 90 degrees ± yaw angle) until a null reading is obtained. The value of the rotation angle (yaw) is recorded for each point and averaged across the duct. Method 2 criteria stipulate that average angular rotations greater than ± 10 degrees indicate turbulent (nonaxial) flow conditions in the duct(s). This procedure was used to check several traverse points at each location. In each case, null pitot readings were observed at the 0- degree reference. These data, together with the velocity and temperature profiles established for each location, indicated acceptable flow patterns that would enable the extraction of representative samples at each site. 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Reference Methods 1 through 4, July 1984. 4-4 ------- At the ESP inlet, a 5 x 5 sampling matrix, or 25 total sampling points, were used to traverse the cross-sectional area of the duct. Sampling ports located on each side of the ductwork (see Figure 4-1) were used to complete the traverse. Each point was sampled for 12 minutes, yielding a total test time of 300 minutes per test. At the ESP outlet, a 5 x 5 sampling matrix was established and 25 total sampling points were used to traverse the duct cross-section. Each point was sampled for 12 minutes, yielding a total test time of 300 minutes. It should be noted that one of the six available sampling ports was not sampled due to the close proximity of an I-beam which prevented insertion of the sample probe for this port. Due to the low grain loading and size distribution results at this site, biases in particulate measurements are believed to be insignificant. The test and analytical procedures used are described briefly here, and detailed procedures are presented in Appendix D. 4.2.1 Velocity and Gas Temperature A Type-S pi tot tube and an inclined draft gauge manometer were used to measure the gas velocity pressures at the test sites. Velocity pressures were measured at each sampling point across the duct to determine an average value. Measurements were taken in the manner prescribed in EPA Reference Method 2.* The temperature at each sampling point was measured with a ther- mocouple and digital readout. 4.2.2 Molecular Weight Flue gas composition was determined in accordance with the basic proce- dures described in EPA Reference Method 3.* Grab samples were collected 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Reference Methods 2 and 3, July 1984. 4-5 ------- prior to the start of any sampling to establish baseline contents of oxygen, carbon dioxide, and carbon monoxide. Integrated bag samples were collected during each test and were analyzed with an Orsat gas analyzer. The gas composition at each test site remained consistent throughout the test series. 4.2.3 Particu1ate/Cr+6 Particulate and Cr samples were collected as specified in EPA Refer- ence Method 5.* All tests were conducted isokinetically by regulating the sample flow rate relative to the gas velocity in the duct (as measured by the pitot tube and thermocouple attached to the sample). The basic sampling train consisted of a heated glass-lined probe, a heated 7.6-cm (3-in.) diam- eter glass-fiber filter (Whatman Reeve Angel 934 AH), and a series of five Greenburg-Smith impingers followed by a vacuum line, vacuum gauge, leak-free vacuum pump, dry gas meter, thermometers, and a calibrated orifice. For determination of particulate concentration, the nozzle, probe, and filter holder portions were rinsed with acetone at the end of each applicable test. The acetone rinse and particulate caught on the filter media were dried at room temperature, desiccated to a constant weight, and weighed on an analytical balance. Total filterable particulate matter was determined by adding these two values. Upon completion of the gravimetric analysis, the inlet sample fractions were prepared and analyzed for Cr according to procedures recently devel- oped by EPA. In summary, the samples were digested in an alkaline solution and analyzed by the diphenylcarbazide colorimetric method.** 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Reference Method 5, July 1984. ** Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, SW-846, 2nd ed., July 1982. 4-6 ------- The volume of water collected in the impinger section of the sampling train(s) was measured at the end of each sample run to determine the moisture content of the flue gas. The contents of the impingers were transferred to a polyethylene container. The impingers and all connecting glassware, includ- ing the back half of the filter holder, were rinsed with distilled water and the rinse was added to the container. 4.3 PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION Samples for particle-size distribution measurements were collected at the ESP inlet and outlet by the use of two different configurations of in- stack cascade impactors. The Andersen Mark III multistage impactor was used at the ESP outlet and the Andersen Heavy Grain Loading Impactor (HGLI) was used at the ESP inlet. The Andersen Mark III in-stack impactor consists of eight size cut-point stages and a backup filter. This impactor was assembled by alternating the stage plates, collection media, flat crossbars, and Inconel spacer rings needed to provide weight cut sizes. The collection substrates were Reeve Angel 934 AH glass-fiber filters that have been heated in a 204°C (400°F) oven for 1 or 2 hours, desiccated for 24 hours to a constant weight, and weighed to the nearest 0.1 mg on an analytical balance. A total of three samples were collected at a single point representing the average velocity and temperature in the outlet duct. Sample times ranged from 210 to 300 minutes. Isokinetic sampling rates were set initially and constant cut-point characteristics were maintained through- out the sampling period. Each size fraction was subjected to a gravimetric analysis using EPA Method 5 procedures. 4-7 ------- For each test, size distribution curves were established representing the total weight percent of particulate matter smaller than the indicated aerodynamic particle diameter in micrometers. Cut-points for the eight Mark III impactor stages were calculated by computer programs contained in "A Computer-Based Cascade Impactor Data Reduc- tion System" (CIDRS) developed for EPA by Southern Research Institute (SRI).* All particle size results are based on a particle density of 1 g/cm3. Data reduction and intermediate results calculations for both types of impactors were performed by the CIDRS program, with moisture contents obtained from the particulate tests. The Andersen HGLI used at the ESP inlet consists of two single-jet impaction chambers followed by a third-stage cyclone and a backup filter. The sampled gas stream enters the system through the Stage 1 acceleration jet. Particles with sufficient inertia are impacted against the bottom of the Stage 1 impaction chamber. Smaller particles flow with the gas stream and exit the impaction chamber through three vent tubes. Stage 2 of the HGLI is simply a scaled-down version of Stage 1 in which the jet nozzle diameter and the distance from jet exit to impaction surface have been designed for the proper Stage 2 cut-point. Stage 3 of the HGLI is a small cyclone of the Southern Research Insti- tute design. A high-efficiency glass-fiber filter removes all particles remaining in the gas stream downstream of the cyclone. The Andersen HGLI was used at the inlet because of expected heavy par- ticulate concentration, which would overload a standard multistage impactor. Three samples were collected at the ESP inlet from a single point in the duct * Southern Research Institute. A Computer-Based Cascade Impactor Data Reduc- tion System. Prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under Con- tract No. 68-022-131, March 1978. 4-8 ------- that was representative of the average velocity and temperature. Sample times ranged from 90 to 120 minutes. At the completion of each test, the impactor samples were recovered in accordance with procedures described in the HGLI operation manuals. Each recovered fraction was then subjected to a gravimetric analysis in accordance with EPA Reference Method 5 criteria. Size distribution curves representing the total weight percent of particulate matter smaller than the indicated aerodynamic particle diameter (in micrometers) were established for each run. The three cut-points for each Andersen HGLI test were determined graphi- cally from information supplied by the manufacturer. All particle size results are based on a particle density of 1 g/cm3. Data reduction and intermediate result calculations were performed by CIDRS programs with mois- ture contents and gas composition data obtained from the particulate/Cr tests.* 4.4 PROCESS SAMPLES During the particulate/chromium tests, the following process samples were collected: 0 Composite fly ash/incinerator bottom ash 0 No. 2 ESP fly ash samples from each of 4 fields Grab samples of the composite bottom ash were collected every 60 to 90 minutes or four to six times during a 6-hour test run. This nonhomogeneous material represents an overall composite of the bottom ash and ESP fly ash from each incinerator. The material was collected from a vibrating screen *Southern Research Institute. A Computer-Based Cascade Impactor Data Reduc- tion System. Prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under Con- tract No. 68-022-131. March 1978. 4-9 ------- prior to loading into trucks for disposal in a landfill. The samples from each test were composited using a morter and pestal and centrifuging so that one representative sample of each sample type per test was available for analysis. Solid samples were extracted and analyzed for Cr in accordance with procedures similar to those used for the Cr analysis of the particu- late samples. ESP fly ash samples were collected in a similar manner as the bottom ash samples except separate samples from each of four ESP electrical fields were collected. For the three tests, 12 samples were collected. All samples were collected sequentially from the B side fly ash hopper. Only the No. 4 field samples were analyzed for Cr for each test day. Analytical procedures followed those used for the bottom ash samples. The analyses of the incinerator bottom ash and ESP fly ash were relatively straightforward and no problems were encountered. Process samples (as designated in Subsection 2.6) were shipped to EPA and analyzed for total Cr, Ni, and Cd using NAA. PEI later analyzed these samples for Be, Pb, and Zn using ICAP. 4.5 ARSENIC Arsenic concentrations were measured by EPA Reference Method 108.* All tests were conducted isokinetically by regulating the sample flow rate to correspond to the gas velocity in the duct (as measured by the pitot tube and thermocouple attached to the sample probe). The basic sampling train con- sisted of a heated glass-lined probe, a heated 7.6-cm (3-in.) diameter glass- fiber filter (Whatman Reeve Angel 934 AH), and a series of five Greenburg- Smith impingers followed by a vacuum line, vacuum gauge, leak-free vacuum pump, dry gas meter, thermometers, and a calibrated orifice. 40 CFR 61, Appendix B, Reference Method 108, July 1984. 4-10 ------- For determination of arsenic concentrations, the nozzle, probe, and filter holder portions were rinsed with 0.1 N NaOH at the end of each appli- cable test. The filter and solids contained in the 0.1 N NaOH rinse of the front half of the sampling train were prepped, combined, and analyzed for arsenic (by atomic absorption). The volume of water collected in the impinger section of the sampling train was measured at the end of each sampling run to determine the moisture content of the flue gas. The contents of the impingers were transferred to a polyethylene container. The impingers and all connecting glassware (includ- ing the back half of the filter holder) were rinsed with 0.1 N NaOH, and the rinse was added to the container. The contents of the impingers and 0.1 N NaOH rinse also were analyzed for arsenic by atomic absorption. 4-11 ------- SECTION 5 PROCESS DESCRIPTION* Tests were conducted on the exhaust gases of the reciprocating grate Incinerator No. 2 at the Baltimore RESCO refuse-to-energy plant. Figure 5-1 presents an exhaust gas flow schematic with sampling locations. The Balti- more RESCO refuse-to-energy plant was designed and constructed by Signal Environmental Systems, Inc., (SES) to provide for the disposal of up to 2250 tons per day of municipal solid waste from the City and County of Baltimore, Maryland. SES also operates and maintains the facility. The facility has three identical reciprocating grate incinerators. Each incinerator has a rated capacity of 750 tons/day and typically incinerates 600 tons of waste per day, 24 hours per day, 7 days a week. Natural gas is used as an auxiliary fuel. Each incinerator has its own heat recovery boiler capable of producing 170,000 pounds of steam per hour at 850 psig and 825°F. The electric power capacity of the turbogenerators is 55 megawatts; the Baltimore Gas and Electric Company is the primary customer. Each incinerator has an ESP to control particulate emissions. ESP emissions are routed to a common stack. The ash handling system for both the incinerator and ESP is the vibrating fan conveyor type. Ash from each system is transferred to a common ash pit for separation of ferrous and aggregate materials. After separation, the ash is transported to a landfill. Prepared by Midwest Research Institute. 5-1 ------- SOLID WASTE HEAT RECOVERY BOILER - INCINERATOR NO. 2 INCINERATOR BOTTOM ASH TO COMMON STACK AND ATMOSPHERE I.D. FAN OUTLET TEST P| LOCATION LJ INLET TEST LOCATION O ESP HOPPER COMMON ASH PIT FLY ASH ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR T TO LANDFILL Figure 5-1. No. 2 incinerator exhaust gas flow schematic. 5-2 ------- |