United States
Environmental Prelection
Agency
Office of Air Quality
Planning .ind Standards
Research Triangie Park NC 27711
EMB Report 85-HWS-3
October 1985
Air
Hazardous Waste TSDF
Waste Process Sampling
Volume I:
Environmental Waste Removal, Inc., Waterbury, CT
Summit Corporation of America, Thomaston, CT
Superior Electric Company, Inc., Bristol, CT
Whyco Chromium Company, Inc., Thomaston, CT
-------
Prepared for
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711
HAZARDOUS WASTE TSDF
WASTE PROCESS SAMPLING
VOLUME I.
Environmental Waste Removal, Inc., Waterbury, CT
Summit Corporation of America, Thomaston, CT
Superior Electric Company, Inc., Bristol, CT
Whyco Chromium Company, Inc., Thomaston, CT
October 1985
Prepared by
GCA CORPORATION
GCA/TECHNOLOGY DIVISION
Bedford, Massachusetts 01730
-------
DISCLAIMER
This Final Report was furnished to the Environmental Protection Agency by
GCA Corporation in fulfillment of Contract Nos. 68-01-6871, Task No. 37 and
68-02-3851, Task No. 8. The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed are
those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Environmental Protection
Agency. Mention of company or product name is not to be considered as an
endorsement by the Environmental Protection Agency.
ii
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Introduction. iv
Environmental Waste Removal Trip Report 1-1
Summit Corporation of America Trip Report 2-1
Superior Electric Company Trip Report 3-1
Whyco Chromium Company Trip Report 4-1
Appendix A - Sample Indentification Form A-l
Appendix B - GCA Data Report Forms B-l
Appendix C - Radian Corporation Data Report Forms C-l
Appendix D - Analytical Procedures D-l
Appendix E - RCRA Part A Permit Profile Sheet E-l
iii
-------
INTRODUCTION
Air emissions from hazardous waste treatment, storage and disposal
facilities (TSDFs) are currently being studied by the EPA Office of Air
Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS). The four sites described herein
represent a portion of the testing program undertaken by OAQPS in an effort to
profile TSDFs and estimate emissions. The results of the testing will be used
as background information for possible standards for TSDF area source air
emissions.
Process sampling of wastestreams at the four sites was conducted. In
addition, detailed information on all waste operations, emission controls and
operating practices was collected. The facilities were selected to increase
the scope of TSDF operations encompassed by previous case study and testing
programs. An effort was made to expand the data base in terms of treatment
operations, waste types and geography.
The wastestream characterization, sample analysis and waste process
descriptions should supply the necessary inputs to emission estimation
techniques. Liquid samples from waste treatment tanks and impoundments were
obtained from each site. Soil samples from land treatment operations were
taken where applicable. The results of these analyses are presented for each
site.
These four Connecticut sites represent both waste generators with on site
treatment operations and commercial TSDFs. Sample analysis and process
descriptions reflect operations on the day of the visit. Included with each
trip report is a summary of the analytical sample results, the actual analysis
results and the Part A Permit Profile sheet for the facility.
iv
-------
Section 1.
Environmental Waste Removal, Inc.
Waterbury, CT
1-1
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section Page
I. Introduction. 1-5
II. Wastestrearn Characterization Data 1-9
III. Facility Process Descriptions 1-9
Wastewater Treatment 1-13
Waste Oil Treatment 1-13
Drum Storage and Transfer 1-14
IV. Sampling Information 1-15
Sample Location Description 1-15
Quality Assurance 1-16
V. Sample Analysis 1-16
Analytical Summary 1-16
Quality Assurance 1-22
1-2
-------
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
1 Quantities and Fate of Wastes Handled at Environenmtal Waste
Removal in Waterbury, CT 1-10
2 Model Input Data for Air Emission Release Rate Determination at
Environmental Waste Removal, Waterbury, CT 1-11
3 Liquid Sample Analysis from the Waste Oil Pit $2 at
Environmental Waste Removal in Waterbury, CT 1-17
4 Liquid Sample Analysis from the North Equalization Basin at
Environmental Waste Removal in Waterbury, CT 1-18
5 Liquid Sample Analysis from the North Equalization Basin at
Environmental Waste Removal in Waterbury, CT 1-19
6 Liquid Sample Analysis from the South Equalization Basin at
Environmental Waste Removal in Waterbury, CT 1-20
7 Liquid Sample Analysis from the South Equalization Basin at
Environmental Waste Removal in Waterbury, CT 1-21
8 Organic Compounds Screened by GC/FID on Samples Collected at
Environmental Waste Removal in Waterbury, CT 1-23
9 Cross Reference List of Submitted Samples Collected at
Environmental Waste Removal, Waterbury, CT 1-26
10 Quality Control Data for Analysis Conducted on the Samples
Collected at Environmental Waste Removal in Waterbury, CT
Surrogate Recoveries - Volatile Organics 1-27
11 Quality Control Data: Analysis of a Spiked Aliquot of Sample
EWR-EN-2A (GCA 41532) for Volatile Organics, Environmental
Waste Removal, Waterbury, CT.... 1-28
12 Quality Control Data: Analysis of a Replicate Aliquot of Sample
EWR-EN-1A (GCA 41528) for Volatile Organics, Environmental
Waste Removal, Waterbury, CT 1-29
1-3
-------
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure Pagg
1 Facility layout for Environmental Waste Removal,
Waterbury, CT 1-6
2 Treatment building area layout, Environmental Waste Removal,
Waterbury, CT 1-7
3 Aqueous waste treatment process flow for Environmental Waste
Removal in Waterbury, CT 1-8
1-4
-------
Site: Environmental Waste Removal, Inc.
130 Freight Street
Waterbury, Connecticut 06702
FCID: CTD072138969
Site Contacts: Mark Ecsedy, Director of Regulatory Affairs
David Green, CEO
(203) 755-2283
Field Trip Personnel: Andrew Baldwin, GCA/Engineering
Timothy Curtin, GCA/Engineering
James Thomas, GCA/Measurements
Douglas Seely, GCA/Measurements
Penny Lassiter, EPA
Mike Dusetzina, EPA
Ron Jones, EWR
Maurice Fortier, EWR
Visit Time and Date: 1:30 p.m., 11/5/84
I. INTRODUCTION
Environmental Waste Removal (EWR) is a commercial hazardous waste
management facility located in an industrial park in downtown Waterbury,
Connecticut. There are three main buildings or areas at EWR: the corporate
office building, the treatment facility, and the drum storage and transfer
building (see Figure 1). There are also three labs located on the premises:
an aqueous testing lab, an organic testing lab, and the main lab used for
research and development.
EWR will accept almost any hazardous waste, both in bulk or containers.
Oily wastes, primarily soluble industrial oils and oily wastewater from metal
working operations, acidic or caustic wastewater, and electroplating wastes
arrive primarily by tank truck. These wastes are treated in EWR's onsite
treatment facility. Oil is recovered as No. 4 oil, blended with listed
hazardous waste with a high Btu value, and sold as fuel oil. Other materials,
such as solvents and ignitables, which arrive primarily in drums, are sampled,
analyzed, recorded, bulked, and shipped off site for recovery, treatment, or
disposal.
1-5
-------
CONNECTICUT LIGHT & POWER CO.
METAL WORKING
FACTORY
KEY
CORPORATE OFFICES AND TESTING LAB
TREATMENT PLANT
DRUM STORAGE AND TRANSFER BUILDING
BUILDINGS RELEASED OR OWNED BY EWR
LOADING/UNLOADING AREA
GATE
CHAIN-LINK FENCE
RAILWAY
Figure 1.
Facility layout for Environmental Waste Removal,
Waterbury, Connecticut,
-------
RECEIVING
TANK 8
SOUTH WASTE
RECEIVING
AREA
ACID/ALKALINE
RECEIVING AREA
SLUDGE
LOADING
STATION
OIL COLLECTION TANKS
AQUEOUS
WASTE
CLARIFIER
NORTH
EQUALIZATION
BASIN
NEUTRALIZATION
TANKS
I
CYANIDE
BASIN
KEY
COVERED AREAS
MIXER
SOUTH
EQUALIZATION
BASIN
TREATMENT
CHEMICAL
STORAGE
TANKS
Figure 2. Treatment building area layout, Environmental
Waste Removal, Waterbury, Connecticut.
-------
I
oo
r
WASTEWATEH
FROM OIL
TREATMENT
SYSTEM
(£) SAMPLING LOCATION
FILTERCAKE TO
SECURE LANDFILL
Figure 3. Aqueous waste treatment process flow for Environmental
Waste Removal in Waterbury, Connecticut.
-------
EWR is planning to install an odor control system to minimize odors
caused by rancid and volatile material in raw oil waste. This control system
involves the construction of a sealed roof over oil waste receiving tank 8
(see Figure 2), the first point where oily waste is exposed to the ambient
atmosphere. Gas cleaning is accomplished by venting tank area emissions to a
scrubber.
EWR services a 300 mile radius. Repeat customers constitute 99 percent
of their business.
Climatic conditions the day of the visit were overcast skies, an ambient
air temperature of 61°F, and northwesterly winds at less than 5 mph.
II. WASTESTREAM CHARACTERIZATION DATA
Much of the waste EWR handles is treated on site, and consists primarily
of wastewater containing soluble oils, acids, caustics, chromium, cyanides,
and some solvents. Four hundred to five hundred 55-gallon drums of other
wastes arrive each week, which are subsequently bulked and shipped off site
for recovery, treatment, or disposal. These include Freon, alcohols,
methylene chloride, methyl ethyl ketone (MEK), perchloroethylene,
trichloroethylene, 1,1,1-trichloroethane (TCE), xylene, methyl isobutyl ketone
(MIBK), acetone, and others. Quantities of wastes handled are presented in
Table 1.
III. FACILITY PROCESS DESCRIPTIONS
This section contains information necessary for estimating air emission
release rates of volatile organics from various hazardous waste TSDF
processes. Model input parameters for the equalization basins and hazardous
waste storage tanks at EWR are provided in Table 2.
1-9
-------
TABLE 1. QUANTITIES AND FATE OF WASTES HANDLED AT ENVIRONMENTAL WASTE
REMOVAL IN WATERBURY, CONNECTICUT.
Waste
Quantity
Fate
Acids (including chromic)
Alkalines (including dilute cyanide)
Waste oil (including coolants, water
solubles, etc.)
Solvents (recovered from waste oil
and from drum storage,
blended into secondary fuel)
Solvents (recovered from waste oil,
shipped off site for reclamation)
Metal hydroxide sludge
220,000 gal/month On site treatment
110,000 gal/month On site treatment
330,000 gal/month On site treatment
45,000 gal/month Onsite treatment
10,000 gal/month Treatment, recovery
or disposal
90 cu. yds/week Landfill
1-10
-------
TABLE 2. MODEL INPUT DATA FOR AIR EMISSION RELEASE RATE DETERMINATION
AT ENVIRONMENTAL WASTE REMOVAL, WATERBURY, CONNECTICUT.
South Equalization^Basin
Impoundment type:
Aeration type:
Operation:
Typical throughput:
Handling/transfer:
Activity:
Typical retention time:
Dimensions:
Surface area:
Average operating surface area:
Average operating depth:
Capacity:
Aerator purpose:
Number of aerators:
Horsepower and efficiency:
Diameter of impeller:
Rotational velocity of impeller:
Percent turbulence of surface:
Nprth_E_qualizatipn Basin
Impoundment type:
Aeration type:
Operation:
Typical throughput:
Handling/transfer:
Activity:
Typical retention time:
Dimensions:
Surface area:
Average operating surface area:
Average operating depth:
Capacity:
Aerator purpose:
Number of aerators:
Horsepower and efficiency:
Diameter of impeller:
Rotational velocity of impeller:
Percent turbulence of surface:
Aerated
Surface
Batch
55,000 gal/day
Above surface pumping (splashed in);
Treatment chemicals added below surface
Treatment
Approximately 12 hours
22.5 ft by 52 ft by 7.25 ft
1,170 sq. ft
1,170 sq. ft
6.25 ft
65,000 gal
Mixing
2
15 hp each
42 in
68 rpm
Approximately 10 percent, but most of
surface quite agitated
Aerated
Surface
Batch
45,000 gal/day
Pumped from tanker through screen above
surface (splashed in)
Treatment
12 hrs
25.33 ft by 35.5 ft by 7.5 ft
899 sq.
899 sq.
ft
ft
6.5 ft
50,000 gal
Mixing
1
20 hp
60 in
56 rpm
Approximately 20%, but most of surface
quite agitated
(continued)
1-11
-------
TABLE 2 (continued)
Waste Oil/Solyent Storage Tanks
Type of tank:
Shape:
Dimensions:
Average vapor space:
Typical throughput:
Capacity:
Color:
Type of vent:
Type of tank:
Shape:
Dimensions:
Average vapor space:
Typical throughput:
Capacity:
Color:
Type of vent:
Receiving, Tank 8B
Type of tank:
Shape:
Dimens ions:
Average amount of waste in tank:
Typical throughput:
Tank color:
Tank finish:
Type of vent:
Percent of tank top covered:
Nature of cover material:
Above ground, fixed roof
Horizontal cylinder
12 ft long by 6 ft diameter
1250 gal (half full)
2500 gal/week/tank
2,500 gal
Red
Connected through ballast
tank to vacuum pump, then
to atmosphere
Chlorinated..Solvent..Storage, Tank, No.. 29
Above ground, fixed roof
Horizontal cylinder
6.5 ft long by 7.5 ft diameter
900 gal (half full)
1,800 gal/month
1,800 gal
White
Open to atmosphere
Underground, open top/partially covered
Square
10 ft by 10 ft by 8.2 ft deep
8 ft
5000 gal/day
N/A
N/A
Open to atmosphere
Less than 5%
Wooden plies
1-12
-------
Wastewater Treatment
All waste entering the treatment system at EWR arrives by tank truck,
either from off site, or from the on site drum storage and transfer building.
Waste acids and caustics received are unloaded into storage tanks at the
acid/alkali receiving area (see Figure 3). These wastes are discharged to the
north equalization basin on a daily batch basis. As this basin is filled, the
aerator impeller is near the surface acting as an aerator.. With the addition
of more wastes, this impeller is further submerged and functions as a mixer.
The facility does not see this as an aeration process as they do not do
biological treatment.
Acidic and caustic chrome and cyanide-bearing wastewaters are received
from tankers at the south waste receiving area. These waste types are
pretreated as shown in Figure 3 and fed to the south equalization basin along
with the contents of the north equalization basin. After further equalization
and neutralization, again on a daily batch basis, a polymer is added to
precipitate dissolved solutes. Sludge is subsequently removed in the
clarifier and dried in rotary vacuum filters. Filtercake is shipped to a
landfill offsite. Effluent from the clarifier passes through several
polishing filters, and is discharged to the city sewage system. Wastewater is
treated at a rate of approximately 50 gallons per minute.
Waste Oil Treatment
Industrial waste oils and oily wastewater to be treated enter the
treatment system at receiving tank 8 after screening to remove solids.
Typically, wastes containing >10 percent organics, exclusive of oily wastes,
will not be treated in this system. Tank 8, which is actually 6 separate
concrete tanks, is a steam heated thermal cracking unit, used primarily for
free water separation. EWR is planning to increase their capacity for
receiving waste oil containing listed hazardous wastes by using three of the
six tanks for receiving such material. Under current operation, only one tank
is used for this purpose. Since listed hazardous waste must be treated
1-13
-------
separately, EWR plans to build a duplicate treatment system. One treatment
system will be used for oil containing listed waste, and the other for oil
containing no listed waste.
Currently, reusable chlorinated solvents are recovered from the waste oil
by pot stills (with cooling by condenser), and stored in storage tank No. 29.
Oily waste containing no listed waste passes through a series of thermal
cracking units, filters, centrifuges, dragout tanks, and oil/water separation
tanks. About 18,000 gallons of waste oil per day are treated by this system.
Wastewater removed during these processes is routed to the north equalization
basin, where it is treated along with other aqueous wastes.
As part of EWR's "secondary fuel program", recovered mixed chlorinated
solvents with a high-Btu value are blended into the reclaimed waste oil and
sold as fuel oil. Since the final product is a listed hazardous waste, it can
only be sold to operations licensed to burn such materials.
Drum Storage_and Transfer
Hazardous waste brought to EWR in 55-gallon drums is unloaded on the
northwest side of the 180,000 square foot drum storage and transfer building.
All drums are sampled and held on the loading dock until the sample is
analyzed and compared to the shipping manifest. Information about the
material in each drum is entered into EWR's computerized inventory system, and
each drum is labeled with an identification number. Drums are then moved to
separate hazard class storage areas to minimize potential for an incompatible
mixture of spilled wastes. Approximately 1,500 drums are stored in the
building at any one time, and 400 to 500 new drums arrive each week. Drum
turnover takes between 3 to 5 weeks.
The drum storage and transfer building also contains several above ground
storage tanks for bulking of materials in the drums prior to shipment
off site, or to the treatment facility onsite. These include three
2,500-gallon waste oil/flammable solvent tanks, three 4,700-gallon aqueous
waste storage tanks, and one 5,000-gallon cyanide storage tank. Material is
transferred from drums to the bulking tanks with a drum pump. Solids are
bulked or consolidated into drums and shipped off site for disposal.
1-14
-------
Twenty to 30 percent of the materials arriving in drums are recoverable
chlorinated solvents, which are sent to General Chemical in Framingham,
Massachusetts. Roughly 30 to 40 percent are mixed nonrecoverable
chlorinated-flammable solvents, which are sent to EWR's facility in Coal City,
Illinois, for treatment or disposal. Approximately 30 to 50 percent are
flammable solvents, of which 70 percent are high-Btu materials transferred to
the treatment plant for use in the secondary fuel program. The remaining 30
percent are low-Btu materials and are shipped to EWR's Coal City facility for
treatment and disposal. Some aqueous waste arrives in drums, and this is
bulked and treated on site at the treatment facility.
IV. SAMPLING INFORMATION
Sample Location Description
Three TSDF sources sampled (Figure 3) at the time of the visit included:
o the north equalization basin,
o the south equalization basin, and
o receiving tank 8B.
Two quadruplicate liquid samples were taken from the north equalization
basin. One liquid sample (EWR-EN-1) was taken near the basin wall, the other
(EWR-EN-2) was taken closer to the mixer and near the inlet cascade. Both
samples were at 19°C, appeared milky white in color and possessed an organic
odor.
Another set of two quadruplicate liquid samples was taken in the south
equalization basin. One liquid sample (EWR-ES-1) was taken near the north end
of the basin, the other (EWR-ES-2) was taken closer to the center of the
basin. Both samples were again 19°C, appeared to be an emulsion and contained
solids.
1-15
-------
A final quadruplicate liquid sample (EWR-0-1) was taken from receiving
tank 8B, the worst-looking of the 6 tanks (Figure 2). The sample, temperature
60°C, appeared to be mostly oil, and was odorless. EWR did not request splits
of any of the samples.
Quality Assurance
Sampling procedures were employed as described in the Quality Assurance
Project Plan dated 30 October 1984. Liquid samples were collected in
quadruplicate. The quadruplicate liquid samples were returned to the GCA
Analytical Laboratory in Bedford, MA, where they were received into the sample
bank.
Sample custody and handling procedures included the use of sample tags,
chain-of-custody sheets, refrigeration of samples between sampling and
analysis, and shipping of samples in coolers sealed with custody seals. In
addition, each sample was assigned a unique sample code which linked it to the
facility, the source, and the sampling point.
The sample matrices and locations made it difficult if not impossible to
collect the liquid samples without air bubbles forming in the 40 ml VOA vial.
In every case repeated attempts were made to obtain the highest quality
samples.
V. SAMPLE ANALYSIS
Analytical. Summary
Tables 3 through 7 provide the analytical summary reports for all of the
process samples collected during the site visit (see Appendix A). These
tables present the major compounds quantified by either GC/MS (GCA
Corporation/Technology Division) or a multiple detector system (Radian
Corporation). The actual data report sheets for each respective sample are
provided in Appendix B and Appendix C.
1-16
-------
TABLE 3. LIQUID 5A«FLE ANALYSIS FSC.1 THE ilASTE OIL PIT 12 AT
ENVIRONMENTAL WASTE REMOVAL IN SftTERBURY, CONNECTICUT.
Kajcr Caaasunds
1,1,1-Trichlcrcetnane
l,i-Dicnlarosi.ia!!9
l.l-uicnicrsethens
4-?.sthyl-2-pent5noriB
Acetone
Ssnzens
Ethylbenzjne
Tetrachloroethene
Toiaene
Total xylenes
Trichicroethsne
trsns-l.'-Dichloraprcoene
TOTAL AROMTIC HC
TOTAL HALQ£E;iATE2 KC
TOTAL CXYEEHATED HC
. TOTAL NOH-HETHANE HC
a,b
Concentration (ag/1)
3200
110
63
3E
74
IS
55
230
830
250
250
1
1200
3?CO
110
5200
a
Analysis at sasoia 41526 by SCA Ccrsoratian/Tecnnaiogy Sivisian using 3C7HS
b
aa/1 = pp.i is5Ui3inq a density of I.
1-17
-------
TABLE 4.
LIQUID 5AHPLE MiAL-sIB FROM THE NORTH EQUALIZATION BASIN AT
EhVIROMOTAL WASTE REHSVAL IN HATERBU8Y, CCN8ECTICUT
Concentration (ag/i)
i jar Cospsunds
1,1,1-Trichlorcathane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1-Qctene
2,2,5-Triaethylhexane
2,3-DisBtnylcutane
2,5-DiaethylhBxane
2-Batancne
3-Hsthyipeatane
4-8ethyi-2-peatsnons
Acetone
Benzene
Bat an en a
Cnlorossnzer.e
Cyclonexane
Ethyibsnzens
Hethylene chlonda
N-Kexane
N-Nonans
N-Gctar.e
N-Psntane
T-2-Hsxene
Tstrachicrsethene
Toluene
Trichlcrcsthens
Trichioroethyiene +
Branodichlorosethane
p-lylgp.2/«-j(ylerie
TQTAL OLrFISS
TOTAL ARCKATIC 4C
TOTAL HALQ3E-5ATED HC
TQTAL 3XY3E8ATE5 HC
TOTAL HON-3ETHANE KC
Analysis 1
O.i
E?
E.3
33
0.3
1.4
0.7
3.9
0.4
120
0.3
2.9
5.S
12
hi,
34
Analysis 2
4.1
C.6
0.7
O.s
1.8
45
14
0.6
O.i
1.0
9.3
12
0.4
0.4
0.4
1.6
48
1.0
~24~
50
15
ec
b
d
Analysis at 3£5si2 41523 by 3CA Corpcratian/Tecnnoiagy Division using 5C/BE.
Analysis zi saspie 41530 by Radian Ccrpcratisn iisii-.g 3C/W.
tail = ppa assuming a density or 1.
Cancjntriticn 3f Oxygenated KC net usea in Total SMHC calculation.
1-18
-------
TABLE 5. LIQUID SAMPLE ANALYSIS FROil THE NORTH E2UALIZATIGN BASIN AT
E8VIRQSHESTAL SiASTE REMOVAL 1M SATER5URY, CGMEC7ICUT
Najor Coapounds
1,1,1-Trknloraethane
2,2,4-Tri3ethylpentane
2,2,5-Triaethylhexane
2-Hsxancne
2-NatnyI-2-autana
2-?rcpanoi
3-ffethylbexana
3-tethylpentana
4-Hathyl-2-psntancr.a
Acatsne
ButancRs
Csr&en disuitida
Chicrobeniene
Cycisnexans
Kst'nyieycicnsxane
.KethylsnB cniarias
H-Qctane
H-Pentane
Nssiisxane
T-2-Hssar.a
T-2-rSntrP.B
Tetrachlorssthene
Toluene
p-lylsns/i-Kylene
TOTAL PARAFFINS
TOTAL ULEFIN5
TGTAL AROMATIC HC
TOTAL HSL3SENATED iiC
TOTAL 3HGENATED HC
TGTAL JiQH-rtETHANE HC
Concsr.tratian (ag/1)
a
Analysis I
I
1.7
10
70
77
0.2
1.9
23
0.5
Bi
—————
81
2S
160
260
b
Analysis 2
0.3
O.B
0.9
0.3
2.5
1.1
0.4
22
6.3
0.3
1.3
6.2
8.6
0.3
2.0
0.4
0.9
7.6
28
0.3
19
8.9
2?
6.6
31
d
64
Analysis cr saaple 41532 by 3CA Cargcratian/Tecnnalagy Division using 5C/',1S and 3C/FID.
Anaiysii of saapie 41533 by Radian Corporation using 3C/TO.
ag/1 - tv* assuaing a dansity ot 1.
Coacantratim of Oxygenated HC not us=d in Total NnHC calculation.
1-19
-------
TABLE 6. LltUIS SAMPLE ANALYSIS FRGK THE SOUTH EQUALIZATION 3ASIN AT
E3VIRONJO7AL BASTE REJWVAL IN SATER3URY, CCJiHECTICUT
c
Concentration (eg/it
Major
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1 , 1 ,2,2-Tetrachlcroathane
1,1-DicJiicreetnans
1,2-Dichicroethane
2|2,5-Trissthylhexine
2,4,4-Tri3e-2-pentene
2-Hsxanons
3-Msthyibsptafie
3-Haihyipafltsna
Scstane
Dibrasocbisrcasthana
Ethylcen.zene
Liacnene
Met.iylene chloride
N-Hsxane
H-Sonans
S-Gctsne
N-Pantane
Tetraciiiorosthene
Toluene
Trichioraathene
p-Xyiens/a-X/isne
trans 1,2-Dicnlarsethylene
TOTAL PARAFFINS
TOTAL DLEFINS
TOTAL fifiGJMTIC HC
TOTAL HALOBENATES HC
TOTAL OXYeESATED HC
TOTAL SGN-KTKAaE HC
Analysis 1
O.S
O.i
0.2
0.04
0.3
13
O.i
0.1
0.03
0.4
O.i
0.3
1.7
0.2
1.1
0.02
19
fa
Analysis 2
0.1
0.03
O.I
0.3
0.3
0.2
4.0
o.a
o.i
0.7
0.2
0.2
0.1
l.i
5.9
0.4
4.5
0.4
7.2
0.9
4.0
d
13
Analysis of saaais 41536 by SCA Corserition/Tacnnolagy Division using 6C/.1S.
Analysis ot ssasia 41537 by Radian Ccr?crati:n using SC/MD.
2Q/1 = pp- assuming a density of 1.
Cincsntratian of Czyganated HC not ussd in Total SfiHC calculation.
1-20
-------
TABLE 7. LICU13 SAMPLE ANALYSIS PROS IKE SGUTH E3UALIZATICN BASIS AT
ENVIRONMENTAL HASTE EEHOVAL IN tiATERBURY, CGNSECTICUT
Major Compounds
1,1,1-Trichlcroathane
l,l-Bichlereet})ane
2,4-Bi3ethylpsntane
4-J?ethyl-2-pentsacn9
Acetone
Butancne
C-2-Ociins
Chiarobenzer.e
CJiisraaez.ians
tthyibanzer.a
iletnyicyclocgntsns
K-Decane
N-Nanana
N-Cctane
K-Pentana
Neonexane
Tetrachisrsethyisne
Toluene
Total Kylans
Trichloroetiiane
o-Iyiens
p-liylane/a-Xylene
TOTAL PARAFFINS
TQTAL GLEFINS
TDTAL ARCjiATIC HC
TGTAL KAL03EHATE3 HC
TGTAL GXV5ENATE3 HC
TP T£i yPH-*!CTi*«?JF 54r
t u i Hw i*Uii . -w i nniit nu
Concentration
a
Analysis 1
0.7
0.3
12
2.0
0.1
1.2
0.5
0.4
2.2
13
0.3
4
2.7
14
21
c
tsg/1)
b
Analysis 2
0.07
0.1
13
0.7
O.I
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.?
0.5
0.04
( f
0.2
0.4
2.9
0.4
1.7
0.1
14
d
5.3
(J
d
Analysis or saapla 41540 by KA GenerationsTschnolaay Divisicn using SC/?.S.
Analysis 3: saaola 4i541 by Radian Corporation using 3C/M.
,55/1 = sps assusing a density or 1.
Concentration of Ssygenated HC net ussd in Tctai SKHC calculation.
1-21
-------
GCA Corporation Analytical Procedure
All samples were screened on an HP 5890 GC/FID to determine the
appropriate dilution factor for subsequent GC/MS analysis. One ul sample
aliquots were injected directly into the GC/FID using the conditions described
in the QA Project Plan with the temperature program proceeding to 230°C and
the Helium flow rate at about 30 ml/min. The thirty-seven organic compounds
which were screened by GC/FID are shown in Table 8. The detection limits for
these compounds ranged from 1 mg/1 to 200 mg/1 owing to the variable response
of the flame ionization detector to these compounds.
Due to the large number of organic compounds screened by GC/FID, sample
analyses were conducted over several days. Subsets of the total number of
compounds were quantified on each day. Analyses were conducted on January 24
and 28, 1985 and February 1, 4, 13, 14, and 15, 1985.
Following the GC/FID screening, the aqueous samples were analyzed using
the purge and trap method (5030 of SW-846) for introducing the sample, or an
appropriately diluted sample, into the GC/MS.
These procedures differ from those presented in Appendix D regarding
sample introduction by GCA. A description of sample identification procedures
is contained in Appendix D and is relevant to these analysis.
Radian Corporation Analytical Procedure
A description of the methods employed by Radian is contained in
Appendix D.
Quality_Assurance
Chain of Custody
A set of samples was received by GCA/Technology Division on
November 7, 1984 for volatile organic analysis (VOA). Routine inspection upon
receipt revealed the samples to be clearly labeled and appropriately chilled.
1-22
-------
TABLE 8. ORGANIC COMPOUNDS SCREENED BY GC/FID ON SAMPLES COLLECTED
AT ENVIRONMENTAL WASTE REMOVAL IN WATERBURY, CONNECTICUT.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
Compound
Methanol*
Methylene chloride
Acetone
Trichlorofluoromethane
1, 1-Dichloroethane
Allyl alcohol*
1 , 1-Dichloroethane
Trans-l,2-dichloroethene
Ethyl ether*
Chloroform
2-Butanone
1,2-Dichloroethane
Isobutanol*
1,1, 1-Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Dichlorobromome thane
1-Butanol*
1 , 2-dichloropropane
Cis-1, 3-dichloropropene
Trichloroethene
Benzene
Relative Retention
Time to Benzene
0.079
0.317
0.342
0.426
0.466
0.512
0.551
0.592
0.612
0.637
0.678
0.684
0.764
0.767
0.790
0.838
0.859
0.922
0.942
0.974
1.00
(continued)
1-23
-------
TABLE 8. (continued)
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
Compound
Trans-1 , 3-dichloropropene
1,1, 2-Trich loroethane
Dibromoch lor ome thane
Hexane*
Ethyl acrylate*
Bromofonn
2-Hexanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
Styrene*
m-Xylene
o-Xylene
p-Xylene
Relative Retention
Time to Benzene
1.03
1.03
1.03
1.10
1.14
1.21
1.24
1.34
1.37
1.45
1.53
1.66
1.86
1.88
1.92
1.99
GC Conditions: HP 5890 ft. x 1/8 inch OD column packed with 17. SP-1000
on 60/80 Mesh Carbopack B; Temperature Program: 60°C for
2 minutes, 60°C to 230°C at 10°C/min., then 230°C for 11
minutes; carrier gas: 36 ml Helium/minute; injector
temperature = 230°C.
*Area counts determined for a single concentration standard only. All other
compounds were determined over a dilution series.
1-24
-------
Air bubbles were observed in some samples; these are noted in Table 9 under
remarks. Upon receipt the submitted samples were entered in the Master Log
Book and assigned GCA Control Numbers as listed in Table 9. Chain of custody
procedures were adhered to and the samples were transferred to the locked
Sample Bank for refrigerated storage until the time of analysis. Sample
custody records were maintained throughout all laboratory procedures.
Duplicate samples were submitted to Radian Corporation of Austin, Texas under
chain of custody for volatile organic analysis (VOA).
Quality Control
Quality control protocols for the determination of volatile organics
included the use of surrogate spikes, matrix spikes, and replicate analysis.
Each sample was spike with a surrogate mixture containing
D^.-l,2-dichloroethane, Dg-toluene, and A-bromofluorobenzene; surrogate spike
recoveries are presented in Table 10. An aliquot of Sample EWR-EN2A
(GCA # 41532) was spiked with volatile organics; these results are shown in
Table 11. Sample EWR-EN-1A (GCA # 41528) was analyzed in duplicate; these
results are presented in Table 12.
1-25
-------
TABLE 9. CROSS REFERENCE LIST OF SUBMITTED SAMPLES COLLECTED AT
ENVIRONMENTAL WASTE REMOVAL, WATERBURY, CONNECTICUT.
Sample
Identification
EWR-0-1A
EWR-0-1B
EWR-0-1C
EWR-0-1D
EWR-EN-1A
EWR-EN-1B
EWR-EN-1C
EWR-EN-1D
EWR-EN-2A
EWR-EN-2B
EWR-EN-2C
EWR-EN-2D
EWR-ES-1A
EWR-ES-1B
EWR-ES-1C
EWR-ES-1D
EWR-ES-2A
EWR-ES-2B
EWR-ES-2C
EWR-ES-2D
GCA
Control
No.
41524*
41525*
4J.526
41527
41528
41529
41530*
41531*
41532
41533*
41534*
41535
41536
41537*
41538*
41539
41540
41541*
41542*
41543
Remarks
LAB
LAB
LAB
LAB
SAB
SAB
SAB
SAB
SAB
SAB
SAB
SAB
SAB
SAB
SAB
SAB
SAB
SAB = Small air bubble
LAB = Large air bubble
*Submitted to Radian Corporation, Austin, Texas.
1-26
-------
TABLE 10. QUALITY CONTROL DATA FOR ANALYSIS CONDUCTED ON THE SAMPLES
COLLECTED AT ENVIRONMENTAL WASTE REMOVAL IN WATERBURY,
CONNECTICUT. SURROGATE RECOVERIES - VOLATILE ORGANICS
Sample GCA Dg- 04-1,2-
Identification Control No. Toluene Bromofluorobenzene Dichloroethane
EWR-0-1C
EWR-EN-1A
EWR-EN-2A
Matrix Spike
EWR-ES-1A
EWR-ES-2A
Method Blank
41526
41528A
41528B
41532
41532 MS
41536
41540
12/07/84
85
92
84
96
119
72
88
114
*
95
114
79
84
111
112
72
152
154
100
95
91
90
98
83
Average Percent Recovery 94
Relative Standard Deviation (%) 16
95
17
108
28
*Matrix interference
1-27
-------
TABLE 11. QUALITY CONTROL DATA: ANALYSIS OF A SPIKED ALIQUOT OF SAMPLE
EWR-EN-2A (GCA 41532) FOR VOLATILE ORGANICS, ENVIRONMENTAL WASTE
REMOVAL, WATERBURY, CONNECTICUT.
Concentratipn__(iB8/l) Percent
Parameter Reported Expected Recovery
Benzene 36.5 50 73
Chlorobenzene 38.0 50 76
1,1,-Dichloroethylene 47.5 50 95
Toluene 40.5 50 81
Trichloroethylene 34.0 50 68
1-28
-------
TABLE 12. QUALITY CONTROL DATA: ANALYSIS OF A REPLICATE ALIQUOT OF SAMPLE
EWR-EN-1A (GCA 41528) FOR VOLATILE ORGANICS, ENVIRONMENTAL WASTE
REMOVAL, WATERBURY, CONNECTICUT.
Parameter
Acetone
Benzene
Ch lorobenzene
1 , 1-Dichloroethane
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone
Methylene Chloride
Tetrachloroethylene
Toluene
1,1,1-Trichloroe thane
Trichloroethylene
Xylenes
1,1,2-Trichloroethylene
Ethylbenzene
(Xi . X2)
aCalculated as «.
X
Concentration
Aliquot A
83
0.29
1.4
0.61
92
8.3
3.9
0.35
123
3.6
0.8
2.9
0.24
0.66
x 100
(•*/!>
Aliquot B
83
0.37
1.8
0.67
61
8.0
5.1
0.47
123
3.3
1.3
3. '8
0.22
1.3
Percent
Difference
0
24
25
9
41
4
27
29
0
9
48
27
9
65
1-29
-------
Section 2.
Summit Corporation of America
Thomaston, CT
2-1
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section Page
I. Introduction 2-5
II. Wastestream Characterization Data 2-8
III. Facility Process Descriptions 2-8
IV. Sampling Information 2-9
Sample Location Description 2-9
Quality Assurance 2-9
V. Sample Analysis 2-9
Analytical Summary 2-9
Quality Assurance 2-11
2-2
-------
LIST OF TABLES.
Table Page
1 Analysis of Process Sludge at Summit Corp., Thomaston, CT 2-7
2 Model Input Data for Air Emission Release Rate Determinations
at Summit Corp., Thomaston, CT 2-10
3 Cross Reference List of Submitted Samples Collected at Summit
Corp., Thomaston, CT 2-12
2-3
-------
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure Page
1 Facility layout for Summit Corporation of America,
Thomas ton, CT 2-6
2-4
-------
Facility: Summit Corporation of America
1430 Waterbury Road
Thomaston, CT 06787
FCID: CTD002496909
Site Contact: Stephen Gerrish, Process Engineer
(203) 283-4391
Field Trip Personnel: Andrew Baldwin, GCA/Engineering
Timothy Curtin, GCA/Engineering
Richard Roat, GCA/Measurements
Douglas Seely, GCA/Measurements
James Thomas, GCA/Measurements
Penny Lassiter, EPA
Stephen Gerrish, Summit
Visit Time and Date: 1:00 p.m., November 6, 1984
I. INTRODUCTION
The Summit Corporation of America is a precision electroplating
operation, primarily serving the electronics industry. Continuous plating,
for items such as wires and long strips of metal, and piece-work (individual)
plating jobs are practiced at the facility. Plating metals include silver and
gold, as well as more commonly used metals such as nickel, tin, and copper.
Due to the presence of precious metals in the sludge removed from process
wastewater, the company investigated the availability of an appropriate metal
extraction technique. Metal extraction operations are very rare in the United
States, due to high cost, but Summit has found an operation in England whereby
precious metals can be extracted cost-effectively. Summit Corporation has
sampled the sludge (Table 1), and found it to contain no organic material of
any kind. Prior to the installation of a belt press for sludge drying (March
1981), sludge was stored and dried in a surface impoundment on site (see
Figure 1).
Summit Corporation has been in business since 1971 and covers an
approximate area of 270,000 square feet. Facility layout is shown in Figure 1.
Climatic conditions the day of the visit were partly cloudy skies, an
ambient air temperature of 50°F, and northwesterly winds at 10 to 15 mph.
2-5
-------
to
0 SO 100 200
=•£=
Scolt.Utl
KEY
® SAMPLING LOCATION
• • • •FENCE
1. CLARIFIER
2. MIXING TANK
3. EMERGENCY HOLDING IMPOUNDMENT
l\. HAZARDOUS WASTE DRUM STORAGE
5. RAW MATERIAL DRUM STORAGE
6. SLUDGE STORAGE
7. SLUDGE STORAGE
8. OLD S.UDGE STORAGE IMPOUNDMENT
MIXING TANK
Figure 1. Facility layout for Summit Corporation of America,
Thomaston, Connecticut.
-------
TABLE 1. ANALYSIS OF PROCESS SLUDGE AT SUMMIT CORP., THOMASTON, CONNECTICUT.
Metal Amount
Nickel 7-10%
Tin 5-7%
Copper 4-6%
Lead 2%
Zinc 2%
Iron <1%
Silver 20 troy ounces/dry ton
Gold 1 troy ounce/dry ton
2-7
-------
II. WASTESTREAM CHARACTERIZATION INFORMATION
Process wastewater in volumes of 325,000 gallons per day is treated to
destroy cyanide and remove metal hydroxides, with the final effluent released
to the Naugatuck River. Three cubic yards per day of metal hydroxide sludge
are removed from the wastewater and stored in a polyethylene-covered waste
pile behind the main building (see Figure 1). Fifty to sixty 55-gallon drums
of 1,1,1-trichloroethane (TCE) still bottoms are generated each year and
stored in a tin covered shed behind the main building. An unknown quantity of
spent alkaline stripper is also generated and stored in the same shed.
III. FACILITY PROCESS DESCRIPTION
The wastewater treatment system found at Summit Corporation is similar to
systems in operation at other electroplating facilities. First, wastewater is
treated with sodium hypochlorite to convert cyanide to cyanate. Then the
wastewater is neutralized, and a polyelectrolytic flocculant is added. The
wastewater is then mixed to increase floe formation, and flows to a clarifier
(see Figure 1).
Clarifier effluent discharges to the Naugatuck River. Sludge at the
bottom of the clarifier is scraped into a 22 foot deep sludge chamber, after
which it is pumped into two 4,500 gallon storage tanks. From there the sludge
is pumped to a belt press for dewatering and eventually moved to storage piles
behind the facility.
A 4,000 gallon 1,1,1-TCE storage tank used to replenish a vapor degreaser
has a carbon adsorption unit attached to it which prevents escape of volatiles
and removes water from air entering the tank. A still in the vapor degreaser
recovers 1,1,1-TCE, and still bottoms are drummed and stored in a hazardous
waste storage area behind the building. This storage area is a covered,
open-ended tin shed measuring 10 feet by 25 feet, and about 8 feet tall. A
maximum of forty 55-gallon drums are stored in the shed at one time, of which
about 20 contain 1,1,1-TCE bottoms. The remainder of the drums contain
primarily alkaline strippers. Residence time per drum is approximately
120 days.
2-8
-------
Specific information necessary for estimating air emission release rates
from the mixing tank and clarifier at Summit Corporation is given in Table 2.
IV. SAMPLING INFORMATION
Sample Location Description
One quintuplicate set of liquid samples (SC-FC-1) was taken from the
mixing tank, the first point where wastewater is exposed to the atmosphere
(Figure 1). The water surface in the tank was slightly agitated. The samples
appeared greenish in color with flocculated metal hydroxides. No odors were
detected. Sample temperature was 19°C.
Quality Assurance
Sampling procedures were employed as described in the Quality Assurance
Project plan dated 30 October 1984. Liquid samples were collected in
quintuplicate, as a standard procedure, with one of the five samples retained
by the facility as a split. The remaining quadruplicate liquid samples were
returned to the GCA Analytical laboratory in Bedford, MA where they were
received into the sample bank.
Sample custody and handling procedures included the use of sample tags,
chain-of-custody sheets, refrigeration of samples between sampling and
analysis, and shipping of samples in coolers sealed with custody seals. In
addition, each sample was assigned a unique sample code which linked it to the
facility, the source, and the sample point.
V. SAMPLE ANALYSIS
Analytical Summary
No volatile organic compounds were found at detectable levels in the
process sample collected during the site visit (see Appendix A). The actual
data report sheets for the sample are provided in Appendix B.
2-9
-------
TABLE 2. MODEL INPUT DATA FOR AIR EMISSION RELEASE RATE DETERMINATIONS
AT SUMMIT CORP., THOMASTON, CONNECTICUT.
Mixing_Tank
Type :
Aeration type:
Operation:
Typical throughput:
Handling/transfer:
Activity:
Typical retention time:
Dimensions:
Surface area:
Operational depth:
Purpose of aeration:
Number of aerators:
Horsepower:
Diameter of impeller:
Rotational velocity:
Clarifier
Type :
Operation:
Typical throughput:
Handling/transfer:
Activity:
Typical retention time:
Dimensions:
Surface area:
Operational depth:
Aerated
Surface
Continuous flow
325,000 gal/day
Sub-surface pumping
Treatment
1.1 hours
10 feet by 10 feet by 24 feet deep
100 square feet
20 feet
Mixing
1
1.5 hp (gear reduced-priginally 1200 rpm)
6 feet
8 to 10 rpm
Nonaerated
Continuous flow
325,000 gal/day
Sub-surface from mixing tank
Treatment
5.5 hours
10 feet by 50 feet by 24 feet deep
500 square feet
20 feet
2-10
-------
Appendix D contains a description of the analytical procedures used by
GCA. Duplicate samples were sent to Radian Corporation for analysis, but
these vials were broken in transit.
Quality Assurance
Chain of Custody
A set of samples was received by GCA/Technology Division on
November 7, 1984 for volatile organic analysis (VOA). Routine inspection upon
receipt revealed the samples to be clearly labeled and appropriately chilled.
Upon receipt the submitted samples were entered in the Master Log Book and
assigned GCA Control Numbers as listed in Table 3. Chain of custody
procedures were adhered to and the samples were transferred to the locked
Sample Bank for refrigerated storage until the time of analysis. Sample
custody records were maintained throughout all laboratory procedures.
Duplicate samples were submitted to Radian Corporation of Austin, Texas under
chain of custody for volatile organic analysis (VOA).
Quality Control
At this time there are no appropriate quality control procedures
available for this type of analysis.
2-11
-------
TABLE 3. CROSS REFERENCE LIST OF SUBMITTED SAMPLES COLLECTED AT
SUMMIT CORPORATION, THOMASTON, CONNECTICUT.
Sample GCA
Identification Control
SC-FC-1A 41544*
SC-FC-1B 41545*
SC-FC-1C 41546
SC-FC-1D 41547
*Submitted to Radian Corporation, Austin, Texas.
2-12
-------
Section 3.
Superior Electric Company, Inc.
Bristol, CT
3-1
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section Page
I. Introduction 3-5
General Facility Description 3-6
II. Wastestream Characterization Information 3-9
III. Facility Process Descriptions 3-10
Cyanide Equalizing Lagoon 3-10
Acid Equalizing Lagoon 3-14
Hazardous Waste Drum Storage 3-14
Reactivation Tank 3-16
Sludge Drying Beds 3-16
IV. Sampling Information 3-16
Sample Location Description 3-16
Quality Assurance 3-18
V. Sample Analysis 3-18
Analytical Summary... 3-18
Quality Assurance 3-20
3-2
-------
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
1 Annual Quantities of Chemicals Handled—Superior Electric,
Bristol, CT 3-11
2 Model Input Data for Air Emission Release Rate Determinations
at Superior Electric, Bristol, CT 3-12
3 Liquid Sample Analysis from the Clarifier at Superior Electric
Company in Bristol, CT 3-19
4 Cross Reference List of Submitted Samples Collected at
Superior Electric, Bristol, CT 3-21
3-3
-------
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure Page
1 Superior Electric Company facility layout, Bristol, CT 3-7
2 Wastewater treatment system at Superior Electric,
Bristol, CT 3-8
3 Dimensions of onsite equalization lagoons, Superior Electric,
Bristol, CT 3-15
4 Cutaway view of reactivation (clarification) tank, Superior
Electric, Bristol, CT 3-17
3-4
-------
Site: Superior Electric Company, Inc.
363 Middlesex Street
Bristol, CT
FCID: CTD001145267
Site Contact: William Demaria, Plant Engineer
(203) 582-9561
Field Trip Personnel: Andrew Baldwin, GCA/Engineering
Timothy Curtin, GCA/Engineering
James Thomas, GCA/Measurements
Richard Roat, GCA/Measurements
Penny Lassiter, EPA
William Demaria, Superior Electric
Visit Time and Date: 9:00 a.m., 11/07/84
I. INTRODUCTION
Superior Electric is a company located in Bristol, Connecticut, whose
primary operation is the manufacture of switches, control panels, motors, and
other motion control equipment. Many parts used in the manufacture of their
products are brought in from outside (e.g., electrical components), although
there are screw machine parts manufacturing, electroplating, and sheet metal
operations within the facility. Waste management has been practiced since
1962.
Volatile organic compound (VOC) use is limited to degreasing processes
and small-scale cleaning. There are no storage tanks for VOCs on site. Raw
materials are received in 55-gallon drums, which are then refilled with
process waste material.
The physical parameters of the site include a 320,000-square foot (main)
building which houses both an office and factory area; a warehouse building is
attached to its south side. To the east of this main building is an
8,470-square yard wastewater treatment facility. All wastestreams from the
main building, including electroplating operations, are treated here. The
final treated process water is sent to a leaching pond which drains into Pine
Lake, and ultimately, into the Pequabuck River to the northeast of the plant.
A large tract of company-owned, uninhabited, sparsely-wooded land surrounds
the main building.
3-5
-------
The environment of the main plant and waste treatment area was extremely
clean, even in the drum storage, manufacturing, and varnishing areas.
Climatological conditions the day of the visit were sunny skies, an air
temperature of about 45°F, and northwesterly winds at about 10 to 15 mph.
General Facility, Description
The objective of the wastewater treatment system at Superior Electric is
to destroy cyanide present in the electroplating process wastewater and to
remove heavy metals such as nickel, copper, and chrome via precipitation.
Solvent use is minimal and spent solvents are shipped off site for recovery or
disposal. The general facility location layout is shown in Figure 1.
Wastewater Treatment—
The wastewater treatment system at Superior Electric is similar to those
found at many electroplating facilities (see Figure 2). First, hexavalent
chromium is reduced to trivalent chromium. Second, acid and alkaline
wastewaters are neutralized in separate lagoons. The equalization lagoons at
Superior serve to maintain a relatively homogeneous pH for wastewater entering
the treatment system. Third, wastewater containing cyanide is treated with
chlorine gas to convert the cyanide to a less harmful cyanate.
Metals present in the wastewater are removed by adding lime and a
flocculating agent, followed by mixing. This causes precipitation of metallic
hydroxides, which are collected at the bottom of the "Reactivator" (basically
a clarifier) and pumped to sludge drying beds. The winter bed is covered (but
vented) to prevent freezing of sludge, while the summer bed is open to the
air. Treated process wastewater is routed via an open culvert to the
Pequabuck River, about 1 mile northeast of the facility. Waste cooling oils
can be concentrated in a reverse osmosis unit, but due to costs these waste
cooling oils are presently removed from the site for reprocessing.
NPDES permit sampling of treatment system effluent (from the clarifier)
found 17 ppb of methylene chloride and 16 ppb tetrachloroethylene. Company
officials noted that the wet paint spray booth operation is believed to be the
cause of the problem, because the wastewater from that operation is entering
3-6
-------
OJ
SLUDGE DRYING ClARIFIER CHEMICAL HOUSE
-
I X X-\X XrXx »—
HAZARDOUS WASTE
STORAGE
PAVED AREA
EQUALIZING LAGOONS
«AW CHEMICAL STORAGE
Sm
PARKING
PAVEO AREA
Figure 1. Superior Electric Company facility layout,
Bristol, Connecticut.
-------
.COIL PLATE AND
PROCESS UASTEWATER
PLATING ROOM WASTES: TREATMENT WITH SULPHURIC ACID
AND SCO I HI HETASISOLFILE TO CONVERT CHROME HEXAVALENT
TO CHROME TRIVALENT.
OIL WASTES. ETCH-BONOERISE
WASTES, PAINT SPRAY BOOTH
WASTE WATER
CYANIDE/ALKALINE
EQUALIZING
LAGOON
=^y
Figure 2. Wastewater treatment system at Superior Electric,
Bristol, Connecticut.
3-8
-------
the acid lagoon. A dry-type spray booth has been installed, which should
minimize loading of solvents to the treatment system. However, the wet spray
booth is still in operation. Apparently, the use of this type of booth will
be discontinued once it wears out.
Drum Handling/Storage—
As noted in Figure 1, there are two drum storage areas at Superior
Electric: one for raw materials, and one for spent (hazardous waste)
chemicals.
Raw materials are stored in drums in a 35- by 45-foot enclosed room on
the east side of the main building. There is a ventilation system which pumps
enclosed air to the outside. Raw materials include perchloroethylene,
kerosene, oils, 1,1,1-trichloroethane (TCE), and various paints, varnishes,
thinners and other solvents. Most drums are grounded to avoid ignition by
sparks.
The raw material drum storage area serves basically as a chemical stock
room, as the chemicals are used in such small amounts. The metal, 55-gallon
drums are fitted with a spigot and placed on their sides on racks. When
employees need a small amount of a specified type of stored chemical, they can
draw it from the drum through the spigot. Approximately 50 drums are present
in the area at any one time. If more chemical is needed, as in the case for a
vapor degreaser that uses 25 gallons of perchloroethylene per week, drums are
taken into the building.
In either case, spent chemicals are returned to empty drums that once
contained the same material. These are placed in an outdoor "hazardous waste
storage" area approximately 25 feet by 35 feet which is located to the east of
the building. This storage area retains about 20 to 25 drums at any one time,
each of which is held for less than 90 days before being shipped off site for
reclamation, disposal, or incineration.
II. WASTESTREAM CHARACTERIZATION INFORMATION
According to Superior Electric"s 1984 "Solvent Management Plan," the
majority of wastes handled by the company are organic solvents, oils, and
varnishes/lacquers. A list of these wastes and their distribution is shown in
3-9
-------
Table 1. Quantities are listed on an annual basis. Of importance to note is
that the quantities listed are substantially more, per chemical, than those
reported in the 1981 RCRA Part A application. The estimates of acid and
alkaline plating chemical use, therefore, could understate present yearly
usage. The RCRA Part A Permit Profile is contained in Appendix E.
The company official noted that the quantity of cyanide present in the
wastewater was quite low. It was believed that the acidic and alkaline waste
streams could probably be mixed together, but the Connecticut Department of
Environmental Protection (DEP) has required Superior Electric to keep waste
streams separate to allow for increased cyanide treatment operations in the
future.
III. FACILITY PROCESS DESCRIPTIONS
This section contains information necessary for estimating air emission
release rates of volatile organics from various hazardous waste TSDF
processes. Model input parameters for Superior Electric are provided in
Table 2. .
Cyanide Equalizing Lagoon
The cyanide equalizing lagoon is an 85,000-gallon capacity, nonaerated
lagoon used for equalization of pH and chemical concentrations for a large
quantity of plating process wastewater. The material is allowed to equalize
freely to obtain relatively homogeneous pH and cyanide concentrations,
simplifying treatment. The lagoon was lined with an 80-mil Sarnafil Fab-tech
liner in August 1983. Dimensions of the lagoon are shown in Figure 3. Based
on review of the dimensional capacity of the lagoon, the maximum depth is
approximately 9 feet. However, at the time of the plant visit, the
impoundment was only about 5 feet filled with cyanide (alkaline) wastewater.
The components of the waste primarily include alkaline compounds
generated from the electroplating operations, a smaller quantity of cyanide,
and negligible organic material. No odor was evident, and organic
concentrations were reportedly low. Waste material from the electroplating
and electroless operations in the main building is transferred to the lagoon
3-10
-------
TABLE 1. ANNUAL QUANTITIES OF CHEMICALS HANDLED—SUPERIOR ELECTRIC,
BRISTOL, CONNECTICUT
Chemical
Oils (i.e., cutting
hydraulic, etc.)
Varnish/ lacquers /
epoxy resins
Kerosene
Perchloroethylene
Solvent M-17
1,1,1-TCE
Alcohol
Paint thinner
Xylol
Plating chemicals
(acids & bases)
Zinc phosphate/
chromic acid
Paint /rust/varnish
removers
Paint and
"reactivator"
Totals
Quantity (gallons/year)
Raw Spent To
quantity quantity3 treatment
4,000 4,000
362 160
600 600
2,602 2,600
60
692 480
40 40
362 120
240 240
(quantity 13,488,500b
not given)
(quantity (quantity
not given) not given)
34
21,900 10,950
(to
landfill)
30,892 15,190 13,492,500
Total — paints/varnishes/lacquers/resins
No waste
(quantity used/
lost to
evaporation)
202
2
60
212
242
\
34
10,950
11,702
11,152
aTo hazardous waste drum storage unless otherwise noted.
bTaken from 1981 RCRA Part A Application.
Source: 1984 Solvent Management Plan for Superior Electric Co., Bristol, CT.
3-11
-------
TABLE 2. MODEL INPUT DATA FOR AIR EMISSION RELEASE RATE DETERMINATIONS
AT SUPERIOR ELECTRIC, BRISTOL, CONNECTICUT
Acid Equalizing Lagoon
Impoundment type:
Operation:
Handling/transfer:
Typical throughput:
Typical retention time:
Capacity:
Capacity surface area:
Capacity depth:
Average operating surface area:
Average operating depth:
Cyanide Equalizing. Lagoon
Impoundment type:
Operation:
Handling/transfer:
Typical throughput:
Typical retention time:
Capacity:
Capacity surface area:
Capacity depth:
Average operating surface area:
Average operating depth:
Nonaerated
Continuous flow
Above surface pumping (small splash)
25 gallons/minute
18 hours3
35,000 gallons
3,264 square feet
9 feet
1,473 square feet
5 feet
Nonaerated
Continuous flow
Above surface pumping (small splash)
25 gallons/minute
23 hours3
85,000 gallons
5,520 square feet
9 feet
2,851 square feet
5 feet
(continued)
3-12
-------
TABLE 2 (continued)
Clari_ficatipn_Tan_k
Type of tank:
Height of tank:
Diameter of tank:
Average amount of waste in tank:
Capacity:
Color:
Condition:
Finish:
Shape:
Vent:
Mixer rotational velocity:
Mixer horsepower:
Impeller diameter:
' Sludge scraper velocity:
Sludge Drying. Beds
Summer
Dimension:
Nature of bed material:
Throughput:
Winter (covered with vent)
Dimension:
Nature of bed material:
Throughput:
Open top
14 feet
24 feet
Full
44,000 gallons
Light blue
Excellent
Specular
Cylindrical
Open to atmosphere
25 rpm average
3 hp
8 feet tapered to 4 feet
1 revolution per 12 minutes
48 feet x 24 feet
Sand
3 cubic yards/year (cleaned yearly)
40 feet x 20 feet
Sand
3 cubic yards/year (cleaned yearly)
aBased on a 5 foot depth and 25 gpm throughput.
3-13
-------
via underground pipes in a utility trench which connects the two facilities.
The lines run under a large paved area. Once in the storage lagoon, no
controls against chemical volatilization into the air exist.
Acid_ Equalizing Lagoon
The acid equalizing lagoon is a 35,000-gallon capacity, nonaerated lagoon
used for the equalization of pH and chemical concentrations for a similar
quantity of plating process wastewater as received by the alkaline lagoon.
The purpose of this equalization step is to bring the waste material to an
homogeneous pH which will result in fewer adjustments in the treatment
process. The lagoon is lined with a plastic material; the dimensions are
shown in Figure 3. Based on review of the dimensional capacity of the lagoon,
the maximum depth is approximately 9 feet. However, at the time of the visit,
the impoundment was only filled to about 5 feet.
Acidic electroplating process wastewater contains a small amount of
organic material. No odor was evident at the time of the visit. Acid wastes
are directed via the same underground line system which transports cyanide
wastes to the alkaline lagoon. As previously noted, the acidic and alkaline
wastestreams leaving the electroplating plant are kept separate throughout
transport and storage until the cyanides are destroyed. As with the alkaline
lagoon, there are no emission controls.
Hazardous Waste Drum Storage
As previously mentioned, empty raw material drums are refilled with the
same spent compound and are stored in a separate hazardous waste storage
area. The area is marked by a fence approximately 25 feet by 35 feet and is
located east of the wastewater treatment facility.
Hazardous waste materials include spent perchloroethylene, kerosene and
oils, 1,1,1-TCE, paint residues, varnishes, thinners, and various other spent
solvents. Empty drums are brought into the main building and filled with
spent material by pouring from a small container or using a drum pump. When
the drums are full, they are moved outside to the hazardous waste storage area.
3-14
-------
CYANIDE EQUALIZATION LAGOON
ACID EQUALIZATION LAGOON
LO
48'
115'
48'
68'
TOP
VIEW
PLAN
VIEW
Figure 3. Dimensions of onsite equalization lagoons,
Superior Electric, Bristol, Connecticut.
-------
A substantial amount of solvent is used in small-scale cleaning (e.g.,
wiping-on by hand), and is claimed as "no waste" in the company's Solvent
Management Flan, making the quantity of spent material less than the quantity
of raw material brought in.
Reactivation Tank
The reactivation tank (shown in Figure 4) is basically a clarifier that
removes metal hydroxide sludges. Floe is generated via the addition of
"Flocculite 532." As water flows over the baffles, the metal hydroxide
settles to the bottom and forms a sludge. This is stirred with a slow moving
"scraper drive." Sludge is pumped from the bottom of the tank to one of two
drying beds. During the visit, only minor surface turbulence was observed.
Tank dimensions are provided in Table 2.
Sludge. Prying Beds
Sludge from the clarification tank is pumped to one of two sludge drying'
beds. One bed is for use in summer months and is uncovered, while the other
is used in winter months, typically when temperatures are below freezing. The
winter sludge drying bed is covered and vented to the atmosphere. The cover,
a translucent fiberglass material, sits approximately 6 to 8 inches from the
bed surface and prevents sludge from freezing.
About 6 cubic yards of sludge are generated annually. The sludge
consists primarily of metal hydroxides. The beds are cleaned once a year and
had been cleaned just prior to GCA's visit. Sludge bed dimensions are
provided in Table 2.
IV. SAMPLING INFORMATION
Sample Locatign_Des_cription
The only TSDF source sampled at the time of the visit was the
clarification tank, or reactivator. One quadruplicate liquid sample (SE-C-1)
was obtained from the center of the tank near the mixer (Figure 4) at the
3-16
-------
R
63
HiATED WATER
EFflUENT
CISAt WATiS
SEPARATION
Aft®
\
StOW MKtNC AND FORMATION
\
\
k •?••:£&•.;•&.
s=
L
to
u
gECiSCUlATION
SEDIMENTATION
Figure 4. Cutaway view of reactivation (clarification) tank,
Superior Electric, Bristol, Connecticut.
3-17
-------
clarifier inflow. The sample contained floe, was clear in color, and had no
odor. A split was given to Superior Electric. Sample temperature was 16°C.
Quality Assurance
Sampling procedures were employed as described in the Quality Assurance
Project Plan dated 30 October 1984. Liquid samples were collected in
quintuplicate, as a standard procedure, with one of the five samples retained
by the facility as a split. The remaining quadruplicate liquid samples were
returned to the GCA Analytical Laboratory in Bedford, MA, where they were
received into the sample bank. (References to quadruplicate samples under
Sample Location Description refer only to samples retained by GCA).
Sample custody and handling procedures included the use of sample tags,
chain-of-custody sheets, refrigeration of samples between sampling and
analysis, and shipping of samples in coolers sealed with custody seals. In
addition, each sample was assigned a unique sample code which linked it to the
facility, the source, and the sample point.
V. SAMPLE ANALYSIS
Analytical Summary
Table 3 provides the analytical summary reports for the process sample
collected during the site visit (see Appendix A). This table presents the
major compounds quantified by either GC/MS (GCA Corporation/Technology
Division) or a multiple detection system (Radian Corporation). The actual
data report sheets for each respective sample are provided in Appendix B and
Appendix C.
Appendix D provides additional information on the analytical procedures
used in the analysis of samples.
3-18
-------
TABLE 3. LIS'JIO SflftPLE ANALYSIS FRQ.1 THE CLARIFIES ftT
SUPERIOR ELECTRIC COMPANY IN BRISTOL, CONNECTICUT.
Concentration (sg/l)
i
Major Compounds Analysis 1
i-!1ethylcyclonexene
2,2,5-Triaethylhexane
2,3,4-TriBethylpentane
3-fethylpentajie
Isoprcpylbeniene
Isovaleraldstyde
Kethylena chloride
N-tomaaa
H-Octane
p-Xyl'Hie/s-Xylsns
TOTAL PARAFFINS
TOTAL QLEFIHS
TOTfiL fiRCilATIC HC
TOTAL HALQ8ENATE3 HC
TCTfiL OXY6ENATE3 HC
e
TOTAL BON-HETKASE HC HD
ss=assss=sssss==s^s=s===s=ss==ssss3s=ssssss--:';'?ssss=ssjj-s^
b
Analysis 2
0.02
0.03
0.02
0.1
0.01
0.2-
0.2
0.02
0.02
0.01
~~~oT
0.02
0.04
0.2
0.2
d
0.7
a
Analysis sf sasple 41550 by SCA Corparation/Technology Division using SC/rtS.
h
Analysis of saaole 41543 by Radian Corporation using SC/MB.
c
sg/l = ppa assuming a density of 1.
d
Concentration of Oxygenated HC not used in Total MHC calcjlatior..
e
ND - itc co«counds detected.
3-19
-------
Quality Assurance
Chain of Custody
A set of samples was received by GCA/Technology Division on
November 7, 1984 for volatile organic analysis (VGA). Routine inspection upon
receipt revealed the samples to be clearly labeled and appropriately chilled.
Upon receipt the submitted samples were entered in the Master Log Book and
assigned GCA Control Numbers as listed in Table 4. Chain of custody
procedures were adhered to and the samples were transferred to the locked
Sample Bank for refrigerated storage until the time of analysis. Sample
custody records were maintained throughout all laboratory procedures.
Duplicate samples were submitted to Radian Corporation of Austin, Texas under
chain of custody for volatile organic analysis (VOA).
Quality Control
At this time there are no appropriate quality control procedures
available for this type of analysis.
3-20
-------
TABLE 4. CROSS REFERENCE LIST OF SUBMITTED SAMPLES COLLECTED
AT SUPERIOR ELECTRIC, BRISTOL, CONNECTICUT
Sample 6CA
Identification Control
SE-CL-1A 41548*
SE-CL-1B 41549*
SE-CL-1C 41550
SE-CL-1D 41551
*Submitted to Radian Corporation, Austin, Texas.
3-21
-------
Section 4.
Whyco Chromium Company, Inc.
Thomaston, CT
4-1
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section Page
I. Introduction 4-5
General Facility Description. 4-7
II. Was test ream Characterization Information 4-9
III. Facility Process Descriptions.... 4-9
Storage Tanks 4-13
Drum Storage/Hand ling 4-13
Process Wastewater Lagoon and Leaching Pond 4-14
Land Application 4-15
IV. Sampling Information 4-15
Sample Location Description 4-15
Quality Assurance. 4-16
V. Sample Analysis. 4-16
Analytical Summary. 4-16
Quality Assurance 4-21
4-2
-------
LIST OF TABLES
Tables Page
1 Wastestrearn and Fate-Whyco Chromium Co., Thomaston, CT 4-10
2 Model Input Data for Air Emission Release Rate Determinations,
Whyco Chromium, Thomaston, CT 4-11
3 Liquid Sample Analysis from the Settling Lagoon at Whyco
Chromium in Thomaston, CT 4-18
4 Liquid Sample Analysis from the Settling Lagoon at Whyco
Chromium in Thomaston, CT 4-19
5 Soil Sample Analysis from the Sludge Bed at Whyco
Chromium in Thomaston, CT 4-20
6 Cross Reference List of Submitted Samples Collected at Whyco
Chromium in Thomaston, CT 4-22
4-3
-------
LIST OF FIGURES
Figures Page
1 Site plan for Whyco Chromium Company, Inc., Thomaston, CT...... 4-6
2 Wastewater treatment process flow for Whyco Chromium Co., Inc.,
Thomas ton, CT 4-8
3 Land application area, Whyco Chromium Company, Inc., Thomaston,
CT 4-17
4-4
-------
Site: Whyco Chromium Company, Inc.
Waterbury Road
Thomaston, CT
FCID: CTD001450154
Site Contact: Barbara Lewis, Lab Director
Stephen Gradowski, Technical Director
(203) 283-5826
Field Trip Personnel: Andrew Baldwin, GCA/Engineering
Timothy Curtin, GCA/Engineering
Douglas Seely, GCA/Measurements
James Thomas, GCA/Measurements
Penny Lassiter, EPA
Barbara Lewis, Whyco Co., Inc.
Visit Time and Date: 9:00 a.m., 11/06/84
I. INTRODUCTION
Whyco Chromium Company, Inc., is a large-scale electrolysis and
electroplating operation located in Thomaston, Connecticut. A large portion
of their operation includes anticorrosive plating of screws and small parts
for the automobile industry. Whyco Chromium has been in operation since 1955,
and is now the primary plater of screws for General Motors Corporation.
Volatile organic compound (VOC) use is limited to degreasing and
small-scale cleaning. Two storage tanks for VOCs exist onsite; one for raw
material (methylene choloride) and one for spent material. Spent material is
temporarily stored in drums and shipped offsite for recovery or disposal.
The physical parameters of Whyco Chromium include a main building of
approximately 26,000 square feet which houses the plating facility as well as
the wastewater treatment and spent waste drum storage areas (see Figure 1).
West of the main plant are two outdoor, 1000-gallon methylene chloride storage
tanks. The main building and tanks are surrounded by a paved lot, which is
bounded on the west by a fence and on the east by a railroad right-of-way
running the entire length of the company's property. Northwest of the
facility, across the Naugatuck River, is a sewage treatment plant and a
hazardous waste management facility owned by other companies. Electroplating
4-5
-------
PLATING OPERATIONS
TANKERS
TO OF(SITE
CYANIDE/
ALKALINE
oo
oo
. ACIDIC
SOLVENTS
3t CYANIDE
SLUDGE STORAGE
-C-
CTi
TRUCKED -*-
OFF SITE
EQUALIZATION
LEACHING OF PROCESS
EFFLUENT TO RIVER
Cr
+3
f
SLUDGES AND
SOLVENTS
TORAGE AREA
1
EQUALIZATION
NEUTRALIZATION
OLD SET
LAGO
(LINE
6
i
FLING
3N &\
0) ®
&SL-I
St-a.
CYANIDE DESTRUCTION
(CHLORINE GAS)
NEUTRALIZATION
METAL
HYDROXIDE
FILTER CAKE
TO LAND
APPLICATION AREA.
SAMPLING LOCATION
Figure 1.
Site plan for Whyco Chromium Company, Inc.,
Thomaston, Connecticut.
-------
wastewater is treated at the main building and the waste streams (both solid
and liquid) are pumped to areas south of the main plant. Solid waste in the
form of metal hydroxide sludge (filtercake) is temporarily stored in storage
piles to the south of the main plant. Sludge is stored prior to land
application. Treated process water is pumped from the main plant to a
wastewater lagoon (former settling basin) after which it enters a leaching
pond located to the south. The eventual fate of treated effluent is the
Naugatuck River, which flows to the west of the company property. Old sludge
drying beds, currently excavated, are also located on the property to the east
of the land application area. The entire Whyco Chromium property is bounded
by two frequently accessed roads, Connecticut Route 8 to the west and
Waterbury Road to the east.
The main plant and waste treatment areas were moderately clean, although
spillage of chromic acid and other material was evident. Climatological
conditions the day of the visit were partly cloudy skies, an air temperature
of about 50°F, and northwesterly winds at about 10 to 15 mph.
General^Facility Description
Plating Operations—
Plating operations at Whyco Chromium are a multistep process. Material
to be plated is first cleaned in either an acid or alkaline cleaner at a
temperature of 160°F. Then, most plating is done in five layers: nickel,
cadmium, copper, nickel and chrome. Both cadmium and copper plating is done
in a cyanide-based solution. Parts such as black screws are plated first and
then painted black instead of chromed. Plating vats are approximately 6 feet
by 3 feet, and wastewaters from vats are sent to the treatment area.
Wastewater Treatment—
The objective of the wastewater treatment system at Whyco Chromium is to
destroy cyanide in the electroplating process wastewater and to remove heavy
metals such as nickel, copper, chrome, and cadmium via precipitation. Solvent
use is minimal. Spent solvents are shipped off site for recovery or
disposal. The wastewater treatment flow is presented in Figure 2.
4-7
-------
00
(FORMER WASTEWATER
LAGOON SETTLING
BASIN)
CONNECTICUT ROUTE 8
FILTERCAKES STORAGE PILES
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
STORAGE TANKS
LAND APPLICATION
AREA
/ / / /"~\
1111 nip! Viu-i»-
OLD SLUDGE
DRYING BEDS
(CURRENTLY EXCAVATED)
DRUM
WASTE
. STORAGE
WASTEWATER
TREATMENT
Figure 2. Wastewater treatment process flow for Whyco
Chromium Co., Inc., Thomaston, Connecticut.
H K K X FENCE
Illllll RAILWAY
PAVED AREA
-------
The wastewater treatment system at Whyco Chromium is similar to that at
many electroplating facilities. First, acidic and alkaline wastestreams are
allowed to equalize; hexavalent chromium in the acid wastestream is reduced to
trivalent chromium using sulfur dioxide. Second, acid and alkaline
wastewaters are neutralized. Third, wastewater containing cyanide (alkaline)
is treated with chlorine gas in two 11,000-gallon cyanide-destruction tanks to
convert the cyanide to less harmful cyanate.
Metals present in the wastewater are extracted by adding lime (to bind-up
chelators) and a flocculating agent, followed by mixing. This causes
precipitation of metallic hydroxides which are removed through clarification.
Sludge from the clarifier is dried in a rotary vacuum filter. This filter has
been in operation since August of 1984. Prior to this date, sludge was
removed from a settling lagoon and deposited in drying beds. Drying beds are
no longer used.
Filtercake is stored outside to the south of the main building. From
this storage area, the metallic hydroxide filtercake is mixed with soil in the
land application area. Wastewater that has been treated to remove metals,
destroy cyanides, and neutralize acid and caustics is routed through the old
settling lagoon and then to a leaching pond to the east of the Naugatuck River.
II. WASTESTREAM CHARACTERIZATION INFORMATION
A review of Whyco Chromium's RCRA Part B application reveals that the
majority of wastes handled by the company include spent solvents (halogenated
and nonhalogenated), electroplating sludges and cyanides, and corrosive and
acutely hazardous waste. A list of these wastes and annual quantities appears
in Table 1.
III. FACILITY PROCESS DESCRIPTIONS
This section contains information necessary for estimating air emission
release rates of volatile organics from various hazardous waste TSDF
processes. Model input parameters for Whyco Chromium are provided in Table 2.
4-9
-------
TABLE 1. WASTESTREAM AND FATE — WHYCO CHROMIUM CO.,
THOMASTON, CONNECTICUT.3
Code
Description
Quantity
(gal/yr)
Fate
F001 Methylene chloride
F001 Freon TP35
F001 Methylene chloride mixed
with oil and still bottoms
F001 1,1,1-Trichloroethane with
oil wastes
F003 Methyl isobutyl ketone
F003 Isopropyl alcohol
F005 Methyl ethyl ketone
D001 Ethyl alcohol
P030 3% cyanide wastes containing
complexed copper, iron,
nickel, cadmium, and
chromium at pH greater than
10 (sludge from cyanide
plating vats)
D002 Acidic and alkaline plating
process wastewater con-
taining low levels of
cyanide and metals
1,000 1,000 gal storage tank—
shipped off site by tanker
truck for recovery/disposal
1,500 Drum storage—shipped off site
for recovery/disposal
500 Drum storage—shipped off site
for recovery/disposal
500 Drum storage—shipped off site
for recovery/disposal
110 Drum storage—shipped off site
for recovery/disposal
220 Drum storage—shipped off site
for recovery/disposal
110 Drum storage—shipped off site
for recovery/disposal
55 Drum storage—shipped off site
for recovery/disposal
312,000 Four storage tanks—shipped
off site by tanker truck for
treatment/disposal
80 gal/min** Treated on site and released
(36M gal/yr) as effluent
aSource: RCRA Part B Application (1983)
^Quantity entering leaching pond—24 hours/day, 6 days/week
4-10
-------
TABLE 2. MODEL INPUT DATA FOR AIR EMISSION RELEASE RATE DETERMINATIONS,
WHYCO CHROMIUM, THOMASTON, CONNECTICUT.
Old Settling Lagoon
Impoundment type:
Operation:
Handling/transfer:
Typical throughput:
Typical retention time:
Capacity:
Capacity surface area:
Maximum depth:
Average operating surface area:
Average operating depth:
Nonaerated
Continuous flow
Above surface pumping (small splash)
80 gallons/minute
4.5 hours3
Approximately 30,000 gallons
4,500 square feet (45 feet by 100 feet)
2 feet
4,500 square feet (45 feet by 100 feet)
8 inches
Leaching, Pond
Impoundment type:
Operation:
Handling/transfer:
Typical throughput:
Typical retention time:
Capacity:
Capacity surface area:
Maximum depth:
Average operating surface area:
Average operating depth:
Non-aerated
Continuous flow
Above surface pumping (small splash)
80 gallons/minute
105 hoursb
590,000 gallons
22,400 square feet
3.5 feet
22,400 square feet
3 feet
(continued)
4-11
-------
TABLE 2 (continued)
Land Application^ Data
Dimensions:
Rate of application:
Amount of time elapsed before
plowing:
Nature of onsite soils:
Height (depth) of wetted soil
remaining after partial drying:
143 feet x 124 feet
3 cubic yards/day
1 day
Silty/clayey
At least 1 foot
Spent Me thylene. .Chloride,Storage. Tank
Type of tank:
Shape:
Capacity:
Average vapor space:
Throughput:
Color:
Condition:
Finish:
Type of vent:
Horizontal, above ground
Cylindrical
1,000 gallons
500 gallons
1,000 galIons/year
White
Excellent
Specular
Open to atmosphere (3/4-inch hole)
aBased on 80 gpm throughput and 8 inches depth.
^Based on 80 gpm throughput and 3 foot depth.
4-12
-------
Storage Tanks
Two storage tanks are present at Whyco Chromium. One each is used for
the raw and spent methylene chloride employed in vapor degreasing operations.
The two methylene chloride tanks are identical in appearance: both are white
and horizontal (approximately 8.5 feet long and 5 feet in diameter) with a
capacity of 1,000 gallons. On the average, the spent storage tank is about
one-half filled (about 500 gallons) with a vapor capacity of equal volume. It
takes about a year to fill the spent tank, and the material is usually shipped
off site by a tank truck once or twice a year. The tank is vented to the
atmosphere through a 3/4-inch hole on the roof.
Another storage tank area at Whyco Chromium is for cyanide and metal
complex plating sludge. The waste is 3 percent cyanide with complexed copper,
iron, nickel, and chromium at a pH greater than 10, and contains very little
volatile material. The sludge cannot be destroyed in the mainstream
cyanide-destruction system (i.e., via chlorine gasification) because it is too
concentrated. There are four tanks for this material, two 2,500-gallon and
two 3,500-gallon tanks, and all are above ground with fixed roof
construction. Approximately 6000 gallons per week of plating sludge are
stored in these tanks, amounting to about 312,000 gallons of stored material
per year. Once the tanks reach capacity (about every 2 weeks), the stored
materials are picked up by tank trucks and hauled off site for recovery or
disposal.
Drum Storage/Handling
As previously mentioned, plating sludges and solvents are temporarily
stored at Whyco Chromium in the main plant building. Drummed materials
account for approximately 3,000 gallons of waste claimed in Whyco"s RCRA Part
B application. Drummed wastes include 1,500 gallons of Freon TP35 for
cleaning (not plating), 500 gallons of methylene chloride mixed with oils and
still bottoms, 500 gallons of 1,1,1-trichloroethane with waste oils, 110
gallons of methyl ethyl ketone as paint thinner, as well as 220 gallons of
isopropyl alcohol used for drying and 55 gallons of ethyl alcohol (see Table
1). Methyl isobutyl ketone was reported in the 1983 Part B application as 110
gallons, but is no longer used by Whyco.
4-13
-------
The drum storage area, which is a loading dock area, is 50 feet by 40
feet, holding approximately 50 drums on the average, each of which holds 55
gallons. The filled drums are picked up every 8 to 9 months and hauled off
site for recovery or disposal.
Process^Wastewater^ Lagoon and Leaching Pond
As previously mentioned, the former sedimentation basin at Whyco Chromium
is no longer part of the wastewater treatment process, but all treated waste
still passes through it enroute to the leaching pond. The surface area of the
lagoon is 4,500 square feet (45 feet by 100 feet) with a capacity of 30,000
gallons. The bottom has a hypalon liner. Process wastewater from plating
operations is pumped from the main building to the lagoon through a 4-inch
diameter pipe. Flow into the impoundment is continuous and above-surface,
producing a small splash. Typically, the throughput of the lagoon is 80
gallons per minute, with an average materials retention time of 4.5 hours (see
Table 2).
The maximum depth of the old settling lagoon is 2 feet, but its average
operating depth is reported as 8 inches. As a former settling basin for
plating (sludge) wastewater, there are about 4 inches of sludge still present
at the bottom of the lagoon, making total operating depth about 12 inches.
Despite treatment of the process wastewater prior to discharge, NPDES
sampling has detected 97 ppb methylene chloride in the waste stream at the
input pipe to the lagoon. This is a potential source of volatile emissions,
especially if concentrations of this solvent in the lagoon increase in the
future. Sulfates, chlorides, ammonia, and cyanates are present in the treated
water in the ppm range.
From the lagoon, the wastestream flows into the leaching pond. This pond
is actually two separate lagoons which operate as one impoundment when the
depth of their contents exceeds 3-1/2 feet. The dimensions of the two lagoons
are, separately, 122 feet by 81 feet for the west impoundment, and 174 feet by
72 feet for the east impoundment. Together, they total over 22,000 square
feet. Their average depth is 3 feet, so that they are more commonly referred
to as two separate lagoons. Like the waste lagoon, the leaching pond is
4-14
-------
nonaerated and continuous, and liquid process water entering it is expected to
leach into the groundwater, and presumably discharge into the Naugatuck River
to the west. NPDES sampling of the groundwater near the recharge pond area
showed some cadmium contamination, which may be migrating from the land
application area.
Land Application
Metal hydroxide filtercake from the rotary vacuum filter is sent to a
land application area measuring approximately 143 feet by 124 feet. Land
application of sludge has been practiced on site since 1973. About 3 cubic
yards per day are applied to the area. First, the filtercake is applied to
the soil. Then, within 1 to 2 days time it is plowed under and capped with
additional soil. The soil is a clayey-silt composite and is, on the average,
reasonably dry (i.e., not soaked). The soil presently used for capping is
that which was excavated from the former sludge drying beds (see Figure 1).
The exact chemical composition of the soil is not known, and potential
volatile emissions from the area would be difficult to assess. At the time of
the visit, soil excavation was ongoing in the land application area.
IV. SAMPLING INFORMATION
Sample Location Description
Two TSDF sources sampled at the time of the visit included:
o the old settling lagoon, and
o the land application area.
Two quadruplicate liquid samples were obtained from the old settling
lagoon (Figure 1). One liquid sample (WC-SL-1) was taken at the lagoon
outlet, the other (WC-SL-2) was taken at the lagoon inlet. Both liquid
samples were clear, with slight organic odor, and had temperatures of 17°C.
4-15
-------
One duplicate soil core sample (WC-SB) was obtained from the land
application area at a point prior to discharge to the old settling basin
(Figure 3). Soil samples were greenish white in color (metal hydroxide sludge)
containing excess lime to prevent leaching of metals. Whyco Chromium did not
request splits of either liquid or soil samples.
Quality Assurance
Sampling procedures were employed as described in the Quality Assurance
Project Plan dated 30 October 1984. Liquid samples were collected in
quadruplicate. Soil core samples were collected in duplicate. The
quadruplicate liquid samples and the duplicate soil samples were returned to
the GCA Analytical Laboratory in Bedford, MA, where they were received into
the sample bank.
Sample custody and handling procedures included the use of sample tags,
chain-of-custody sheets, refrigeration of samples between sampling and
analysis, and shipping of samples in coolers sealed with custody seals. In
addition, each sample was assigned a unique sample code which linked it to the
facility, the source, and the sample point.
V. SAMPLE ANALYSIS
Analytical Summary
Tables 3 through 5 provide the analytical summary reports for all of the
process samples collected during the site visit (see Appendix A). These
tables present the major compounds quantified by either GC/MS (GCA
Corporation/Technology Division) or a multiple detector system (Radian
Corporation). The actual data report sheets for each respective sample are
provided in Appendix B and Appendix C.
Appendix D contains information on GCA and Radian analytical methods.
Aqueous samples and soil cores from Whyco Chromium were analyzed.
4-16
-------
i
180'
^
1
I
. OLD SLUDGE
WITH SOIL FROM
. OLD BED
/' /
1 /
SOIL . /
COVERED / ;
/ X
1 ' Nx/ OLD
r A DEPOSIT
/ \
, \
/ X
/ *
/ J
/ \
;
/ ]
^ i
i \
'• \
±
5*
H*-
80
40'-
NOTE:NOT TO SCALE
® SAMPLE POINT
Figure 3. Land application area, Whyco Chromium Company, Inc.,
Thomaston, Connecticut.
4-17
-------
TABLE 3. LIQUID SAMPLE ANALYSIS FROM THE SETTLING LA6QON
AT HKYCQ CHROMIUM IN THQHASTGN, CONNECTICUT.
Hajcr Coapsunds
Acetone
Butanor.s
Isohexane
Msthylene chloride
N-Hexane
N-Per.tane
Nechexane
TOTAL PARAFFINS
TOTAL HALQEENATED HC
TOTAL OXYGENATED KC
TOTAL NQN-flETHANE KC
Concentration (cg/1)
Analysis 1
ND
b
Analysis 2
1.7
0.1
0.01
0.09
0.02
0.05
0.06
0.09
1.3
0.3
d
Analysis of sasole 41559 by BCft Corporation/Technology Division using EC/US.
Analysis of saipie 41557 by Radian Corporation using SC/RO.
•g/1 =ppa assuming a density of 1.
Concentration of Oxygenated KC not used in Total NH.HC calculation.
ND = No coapounds detected.
4-18
-------
TABLE 4. LIQUID SAMPLE ANALYSIS FROM THE SETTLING LASOON
AT WHYCO CKROniUn IN THOMASTON, CONNECTICUT.
Concentration
a
Major Ccapeunds Analysis t
1-Propanoi
2,3-Diaetnylbutane
2,4,4-Trise-2-pentsne
2-flBthyl-2-butene
2-Propanol
Acetone
Acstsnitrile
Butanone
Issbutane
Isohexane
Hethylcyciohexane
Kethylene chloride
N-Sutans
,N-He:ane
N-Ncnane
N-Psntane
Nechexane
T-2-Hexene
p-Xyler.e/a-Xylene
TOTAL PARAFFISS
TOTAL OLEFINS
TOTAL AROMATIC KC
TOTAL HALOSENATED HC
TOTAL OXYEESATED HC
e
TOTAL NQN-HETHANE KC ND
:=s=s===s==:
C
(ig/1)
Analysis
0.01
0.02
0.02
0.03
0.2
0.06
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.05
0.01
0.01
0.06
0.01
0.0!
0.01
0.3
0.1
0.01
0.06
0.2
d
0.5
b
2a & 2b
1.6
0.1
0.02
0.09
0.02
0.05
0.06
0.2
0.09
1.3
d
0.3
b
Analysis of saiple 41559 by 6CA Ccrporatior./Technolcgy Division using 6C/HS.
Analysis of saapies 41557 & 41558 by Radian Corporation using SC/MD.
•g/1 = p?3 assuaing a density of 1.
Concentration of Oxygenated HC not used in Total NMHC calculation.
ND = No ccapounds detected.
4-19
-------
Rajcr Cospeunds
Hethylene chloride
TOTAL HflLGSENATED HC
TOTAL NCN-HETHAHE HC
TABLE 5. SOIL SAMPLE ANALYSIS FROM THE SLUDSE 8E3 AT
KHYCO CHROIUUfl IN THOHASTQN, CONNECTICUT.
a,b
Concentration lug/g)
28
28
Analysis oi saiple 41562 by BCA Corporation/Technology Division using EC/MS.
uq/g
assming a density of 1.
4-20
-------
Quality Assurance
Chain of Custody
A set of samples was received by CCA/Technology Division on
November 7, 1984 for volatile organic analysis (VOA). Routine inspection upon
receipt revealed the samples to be clearly labeled and appropriately chilled.
Upon receipt the submitted samples were entered in the Master Log Book and
assigned GCA Control Numbers as listed in Table 6. Chain of custody
procedures were adhered to and the samples were transferred to the locked
Sample Bank for refrigerated storage until the time of analysis. Sample
custody records were maintained throughout all laboratory procedures.
Duplicate samples were submitted to Radian Corporation of Austin, Texas under
chain of custody for volatile organic analysis (VOA).
Quality Control
At this time there are no appropriate quality control procedures
available for this type of analysis.
4-21
-------
TABLE 6. CROSS REFERENCE LIST OF SUBMITTED SAMPLES COLLECTED
AT WHYCO CHROMIUM IN THOMASTON, CONNECTICUT.
Samples GCA
Identification Control
WC-SL-1 41552*
WC-SL-1A 41553*
WC-SL-1B 41554
WC-SL-1C 41555
WC-SL-1D 41556
WC-SL-2 41557*
WC-SL-2A 41558*
WC-SL-2B 41559
WC-SL-2C 41560
WC-SL-2D 41561
WC-SB-1 41562
WC-SB-2 41563
^Submitted to Radian Corporation, Austin, Texas.
4-22
-------
APPENDIX A
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION FORMS
A-l
-------
SANPLE INVENTORY FOR ENVIRONMENTAL METE REHOVAL III UATEKBURY, CONNECTICUT.
FACILITY
IDI
CTD072I3B949
CTD072I3B949
CT0072138969
C1D072I3B969
CTD072I38949
CTD072I3B949
CTB072I38949
CTD072I38969
010072116969
CTD07213B949
CTD0721JB969
CTD072I38919
CTD07213B969
CTD072I3B949
CTG072I38919
CTM72I3B969
CTD072naU9
CW72IIB969
CTD072I36949
CTD072I 38949
CTD072HB949
CT0072I 36949
CTD072I 38949
CTD072I3B919
CTD072I3B969
EUR
EUR
ENR
ENR
ENR
ENR
EUR
EUR
EUR
EUR
EUR
EUR
EUR
EUR
ENR
EUR
EUR
ENR
ENR
ENR
ENR
ENR
ENR
ENR
ENR
SITE SOURCE CO
Niitt Oil Pit 12
Uaiti Oil Pit 12
Nuti Oil Pit 12
Uuti Oil Pit 12
Null Oil Pit 12
North Equiliiition Biiin
North Equiliiition Biiin
North Equiliiition Biiin
North Equiliiition Biiin
North Equiliiition Biiin
North Equilizition Biiin
North Equiliiition Buln
North Equilizition Biiin
North Equiliiition Buln
North Equiliiition Biiin
South Equiliiition Buln
South Equiliiition Buln
South Equiliiition titin
South Equiliiition Biiin
South Equiliiition Biiin
South Equiliiition Buln
South Equiliiition Buln
South Equilitition Buln
South Equiliiition Biiin
South Equiliiition Bitin
SAHPLE
HNENTS ID D
EUR-O-IA
EUR-O-ID
EUR-O-IC
ENR-O-IC
EUR-fl-ID
ENR-EN-IA
EUR-EN-IA
END-EN- IB
EUR-EN-IC
EUR-EN-ID
EUR-EN-2A
EUR-EN-2A
EWR-EN-2B
ENR-EN-2C
ENR-EN-20
ENR-ES-IA
EUR-ES-1A
EUR-ES-1B
EW-ES-IC
EVR-ES-ID
EUR-ES-2A
EUR-ES-2A
EUR-ES-2B
ENR-ES-2C
EUR-ES-2D
BAHPLE
TYPE
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
LAD
CONTROL 1
41324
41323
41324
41324
41327
41328
41328
41329
41330
41331
41332
41332
41333
41534
41533
41536
41334
41337
41338
41339
41540
41540
41541
41342
4 1541
DATE
6AHPLED C
11/05/84
11/05/84
11/03/84
11/03/84
11/05/84
11/03/84
11/03/84
11/03/84
11/03/84
11/05/84
11/03/84
11/03/84
11/03/84
11/03/84
11/03/84
11/03/84
11/03/84
11/03/84
11/03/84
11/03/84
11/05/84
11/05/84
11/03/84
11/03/84
11/05/84
SAHPLINB
ONIRACTOI
6CA
BCA
BCA
BCA
BCA
BCA
ECA
ECA
BCA
6CA
GCA
BCA
8CA
BCA
6CA
ECA
BCA
BCA
BCA
BCA
ECA
BCA
ECA
ECA
ECA
DATE
I RECEIVED
11/14/84
11/14/84
11/07/84
11/07/84
11/07/84
11/07/84
11/07/84
11/07/84
11/14/84
11/14/84
11/07/84
11/07/84
11/14/84
II/I4/B4
11/07/84
11/07/84
11/07/84
11/14/84
11/14/84
11/07/84
11/07/84
11/07/84
11/14/84
11/14/84
11/07/84
DATE «
ANALYZED C(
NA
NA
12/07/64
12/03/84
NA
12/07/84
12/04/84
NA
01/21/65
NA
12/12/B4
12/04/84
01/21/85
NA
NA
12/04/84
12/07/84
01/21/65
NA
NA
12/04/84
12/07/84
01/21/85
NA
NA
INALYSIS
INTRACTO
RAD
RAD
GCA
GCA
GCA
BCA
BCA
BCA
RAD
RAD
ECA
BCA
RAD
RAD
GCA
BCA
BCA
RAD
RAD
GCA
GCA
BCA
RAD
RAD
BCA
DATE
R REPORTED
02/12/B5
12/13/84
02/I2/BS
12/13/84
02/28/63
02/12/85
12/19/84
02/28/85
12/13/84
02/12/85
02/26/83
12/13/84
02/12/85
02/28/85
NA * not inilyiid
-------
SAMPLE INVENTORY FDR SUHHIT CORPORATION IN THOHASTON, CONNECTICUT.
1
co
FACILITY
IDI
CTD00249I90? Suilit
CTDOOJ49I909 Suuit
CTC002491909 Suilit
CTB00249I90? Suilit
CT0002491909 Suuit
NA * not analyzed
6V > broken vial
BITE
Corporation
Corporation
Corporation
Corporation
Corporation
SOURCE
Flock Chaibtr
Flock Chaibtr
Flock Chaibtr
Flock Chaiber
Flock Chaiber
SAMPLE
COMMENTS ID 1
SC-FC-IA
SC-FC-ID
SC-FC-IC
SC-FC-IC
GC-FC-U
SAMPLE
TYPE
liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
LAS
CONTROL 1
41344
41343
41544
41546
41347
DATE
SAMPLED
I1/04/B4
11/01/84
H/Ot/B4
11/06/64
11/06/84
.
SAMPLING
CONTRACTOR
GCA
BCA
GCA
GCA
8CA
DATE DATE
RECEIVED ANALY2EB
11/14/84 NA.BV
11/14/84 NA.BV
11/07/84 12/04/84
1I/07/G4 12/04/84
11/07/84 NA
ANALYSIS
CONTRACTOR
RAD
RAD
GCA
GCA
GCA
DATE
REPORTED
I2/1J/B4
02/I2/B5
-------
SAMPLE INVENTORY FDR SUPERIOR ELECTRIC IN BRISTOL, CONNECTICUT.
FACILITY
101
CTDOOII45267
CTDOOJI45217
CTDOOl 145267
CTDOOI 145267
CIDOOI145267
SITE
Superior EUctrlc
Superior Electric
Superior Electric
Superior Electric
Superior Electric
SOURCE
CljrHler
CUrilier
CUrilier
CUrilier
CUrilier
COMMENTS
SE-
SE-
SE-
SE-
SE-
SAMPLE
ID 1
-IA
-IB
-1C
-1C
-IB
SAMPLE
TYPE
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
LAB
CONTROL 1
4134B
41341
41330
41330
41331
DATE
SAMPLED
11/07/04
11/07/04
11/07/04
11/07/04
11/07/04
SAMPLING
CONTRACTOR
OCA
ECA
OCA
OCA
OCA
DATE
RECEIVED
11/14/04
11/14/04
11/07/04
11/07/04
11/07/04
DATE
ANALYZED
01/21/03
NA
12/04/04
12/04/04
NA
ANALYSIS DATE
CONTRACTOR REPORTED
RAD '01/13/03
RAD
CCA 12/13/04
OCA 02/12/03
OCA
NA • not iitilyzed
-------
SAHPLE INVENTORY FOR NHVCO CHRDHIUH III THOI1AS10N, CONNECTICUT.
FACILITY
101
CTD00249I909
CTD002491909
CTC00249I909
UD002491909
CTD00249I909
CT&00249I909
CTD002491909
CTD00249I909
CTD00249I909
CTD00249I909
CT000249I909
CTD00249I909
CTD002491909
CTD00249I909
SITE
Nhyco Chraiiui
Hhyco Chraiiui
Hhyco Chraiiui
Hhyco Chroiiui
Khyco Chroiiui
Khyco Chroiiui
Hhyco Chroiiui
Nhyco Chraiiui
Hhyco Chroiiui
Hhyco Chroiiui
Hhyco Chraiiui
Hhyco Chroiiui
Hhyco Chroiiui
Hhyco Chroiiui
SOURCE
Settling Ligoon
Settling Ligoon
Settling Ligoon
Settling Ligoon
Settling Ligoon
Settling Ligoon
Settling Ligoon
Settling Ligoon
Settling Ltgoon
Settling Ligoon
Settling Ligoon
Settling Ligoon
Sludge Bed
Sludge Bed
SAMPLE
CONHENT8 IDI
HC-SL-I
HC-SL-IA
NC-SL-IB
NC-SL-IC
NC-SL-1D
NC-SL-ID
NC-SL-2
HC-SL-2A
NC-5L-2I
NC-SL-2D
NC-SL-2C
HC-BL-2D
UC-SB-I
HC-SB-2
! SAHPLE
T»PE 1
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Soil Con
Soil Con
LAI
DONTROL 1
41352
4I3S3
41334
41333
41554
41554
41337
41358
41339
41339
41340
41341
41342
41543
DATE
6AHPLED C
11/04/84
11/04/84
11/04/84
11/04/84
11/04/84
11/04/84
11/04/84
11/04/84
11/04/84
11/04/84
11/04/84
11/06/84
11/06/84
11/06/84
BAWLING
IONTRACTOI
GCA
GCA
ECA
GCA
GCA
GCA
6CA
GCA
GCA
GCA
GCA
GCA
GCA
GCA
DATE
1 RECEIVED
11/14/84
11/14/84
11/07/84
11/07/84
11/07/84
11/07/84
11/14/84
11/14/84
11/07/84
11/07/84
11/07/84
11/07/84
11/07/84
11/14/84
DATE I
ANALVIED 0
NA
NA
12/04/84
NA
12/04/84
12/04/84
01/21/83
01/21/85
17/03/84
12/04/84
NA
NA
02/21/83
NA
ANALV5IS
DNTRACK
RAD
RAD
GCA
GCA
GCA
6CA
RAD
RAD
BCA
GCA
GCA
GCA
GCA
RAD
i DATE
!R REPORTED
01/07/83
12/13/84
02/12/85
02/28/83
02/28/85
12/13/84
02/12/85
01/28/83
NA * not inilyied
-------
APPENDIX B
GCA DATA REPORT FORMS
B-l
-------
Project
1-628-037
GCA Control No.
41526
DATA REPORT SHEETS
Purgeables
Sample I.D.
Analysis Date ,123/84_(FID) 12/7/ 84 (MS)
Sample Matrix Liquid
Instrument HP 5985,GC/MS_ Sample Dilution 1 ul PI (FID)
HP 5890 GC/FID 1:2500 PT (MS)
Parameter
Chlororaethane
Bromome thane
Vinyl chloride^ .
Chloroethane
Methvlene chloride
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
1 , 1-D ichloroethene
1 , 1-Dichloroethane
Trans-1 ,2-dichloroethene
Chloroform
2-Butanone
1,1, 1-Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Bromodichiororaethane
Total xylenes
Concentration
(ug/l)
ND*
ND
ND*
ND
ND
74000M
ND J
68000M
108000M
ND/'
ND
ND**
3.2 T 10°F
ND
ND
248000M
Parameter
1 , 1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane^
1,2-Dichloropropane
Trans-1 ,3-Dichloropropene
Trichloroethene ^^
Dibromochlorome thane
[Benzene
cis-l^S-Dichloropropene
2-Chloroethvl vinyl ether
Bromoform
4-Methvl-2-pentanone
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethvlbenzetie . ^
Stvrene
Concentration
(ug/l)
ND
ND
^^SIQM (*}
252000M
ND
18000M (K)
ND
ND*
ND
38000M
229000M
875000F
ND
'ijQQOil
ND
PT « Purge and Trap
DI - Direct Injection
ND = < 25,000 yg/1
ND* = < 50,000 yg/1
ug/l » ppb (for density of water = 1)
K = Quantitation below detection limit
M = Quantitated by GC/MS.
F = Quantitated by GC/FID.
Blank contamination was observed for this compound.
GCA
no c
Technology Division
B-2
-------
Project
.1-628-037
GCA Control No.
DATA REPORT SHEET
Qualitative Compounds*
Sample I.D. EWR-0-1C
Analysis Date . 12/3/84.(FID).12/7/84 (MS)
Sample Matrix Liquid Instrument HP5985GC/MS Sample Dilution l^ul PI (FID)
1:2500 PI (MS)
Parameter
AllYl Alcohol _ . . .
Bis(chloromethYl)ether
Cyclohexane
CYclohexanoneT^_ _.._
1^2-Dibromoethane _ _
D ichlorod if luorome thane
piethvl,-etber__^_,_.,n
Ethyl^acetate_^
EthYl_acrvlate _
Concentration
(ug/1)
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Parameter
Furfura^. _
I§ol}utYl alcohol
Methyl acetate ^^ ..
Methyl alcohol
Methyl methacrylate
n-Butyl alcohol
n-Propyl benzene .
Tetrahydrofuran .
Trichlorof luorome thane _ ._
Ij-l^Z-Trichloro-
1^2,,2-trif luoroe thane
Trifluoroethane
Concentration
(pg/1)
ND
• ND
ND
ND
187000M
ND
ND
1 ND
ND
ND
ND
Concentration based on a comparison of the total ion area of the compound with
that of the internal standard.
NA = Not analyzed. by purge and trap
PT = Purge and Trap
DI = Direct Injection
ND
< 25,000 yg/1
ug/1 = ppb (for density of water = 1)
M = Quantitated by GC/MS.
B-3
GCA
GCA CORPORATION
Technology Division
-------
Project
1-628-037
GCA Control No.
41528
DATA REPORT SHEETS
Purgeables
Sample I.D. __JEHR-EN-1A
Analysis Date _A2/_*/A*_-gIP) 12/7/84 (MS)
Sample Matrix Water
Instrument KP 5_985 GC/MS Sample Dilution 1 ul PI (FID)
HP 589CTGC7F1D 1:100 PT (MS)
Parameter
Chlorome thane
Bromome thane
Vinyl ^chloride
Chloroethane
Methvlene chloride
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
1 , 1-Dichloroethene
1 , 1-Dichloroethane
Trans-lJ2-dichloroethene
Chloroform
2-Butanone
1.1. 1-Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Bromodichlorome thane
Total xylenes
Concentration
(ug/1)
NO*
ND
ND*
ND
5100M
83000F
ND
ND
670M (K)
. ND-'
ND
57490M*
3300M
ND
ND
3800M
Parameter
IjJ.^^-Tetrachloroethane
1 , 2-Dichloropropane
Trans-1 ,3-Dichlorooropene
Trichloroethene
Dibromochloromethane
Benzene
cis-1 ,3-Dichloropropene
2-Chloroethyl vinvl ether
Bromoform
4-Methyi-2-pentanone
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
Stvrene
Concentration
(ug/1)
ND
ND
ND
1300M
ND
370M (K)
ND
ND*
ND
8000M
470M (K)
123000F
1800M
1300M
ND
PT = Purge and Trap
DI - Direct Injection
ND = < 1000 yg/1
ND* = < 2000 yg/1
ug/1 = ppb (for density of water = 1)
K = Quantitation below detection limit
M = Ouantitated fay GC/MS.
F = Quantitated by GC/FID.
*Corrected for the blank value.
GCA
GCA CGRPCSAnOM
Technology Division
B-4
-------
Project
1-628-037
CCA Cor.tro! Mo. U323
DATA REPORT SHEET
Qualitative Compounds*
Sample I.D.
EtfR-EN-lA
Analysis Date 12/4/34 (FID) 12/7/84 (MS)
Sample Matrix Water,
Instrument HP 3985 GC/HS Sample Dilution 1 yl PI (?IP)
HP 5890 GC/FID 1:100 FT (MS)
Parameter
Allvl Alcohol
B.is(cbloromethYlle£he^ ,_,
Cyclchexane
(pvclghexanone
1 ,2-Dibromoethane
Dichlorodif lucronethane
Diethyl .ether . ._
Ethyl acetate
Ethvl acrvlate
-
Concentration
(ug/1)
ND
MD
ND
NR
ND
NU
ND
ND
ND
'*'
L _- ., _
1
Parameter
Furfural _
Iggbut^i alcghol
Methyl acetate ~
Methyl alcohol
Methyl methsqrvlate^ __
n-Bntyl glcohpl - -
n-Propyl benzene
T^trahydrofuran
Tricblorof luoroaetbane_^.
1 1.1,2-Trichlcro-
1,,2,2-triflugroeth.ine
Ttif luoroethane
Concentration
(yg/1)
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Nn
1 ND
NT)
N.O
*Concentration based on a comparison of the total ion area of the co-tnound with
that of the internal standard.
NA = Not analyzed by purge and trap
PT = Purge and Trap
DI » Direct Injection
ND
< 1000 jig/1
ug/1 = ppb (for density of water = 1)
OCA CGRPCFATOi
iiogy Ci vision
B-5
-------
Project
1-628-037
CCA Control Nc. 41523 (duplicate)
DATA REPORT SHEETS
Purgeables
Sample I.D.
Sample Matrix Water
Analysis Date ,12/4/84 (FID) 12/7/84 (MS)
Instrument iP^59.g5_GC/MS . Sample Dilution
1 ul_DI (FID)
Parameter
Chlorome thane
Bromomethane
Vinyl chloride
Chloroethane
Methylene chloride
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
1, 1-Dichloroethene
1 , 1-Dichloroethane
Trans-1 ,2-dichloroethene
Chloroform
2-Butanone
1,1, 1-Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Bromodichlorome thane
Total xylenes
HP
Concentration
(ug/1)
ND*
ND
ND*
ND
3900M
83000F
ND
ND
610M (F)
ND
ND
88490M*
3600M
ND
ND
2900M
5890 CC/FID
Parameter
1,,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1 , 2-D ich loroprocane
Trans-1 ,3-Dichloropropene
rTf ichloroathene
Dibromochloromethana
Benzena
cis-1 ,3-Dichloropronene
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ethsr
Bromoform
A-Methvl-2-pentanone
Tetrachloroethene
Toluens
Chlorobenzene .
Ethylbenzene
Stvrene
1:100 PT (^
Concentration
(ug/1)
ND
ND
ND
800M (K)
ND
290M (K)
ND
ND
ND
8 3COM
350M (K)
123000F
1400M
660M (K)
ND
PT = Purge and Trap
DI = Direct Injection
ND = < 1000 yg/1
ND* = < 2000 yg/1
ug/1 = ppb (for density of water = 1)
K = Quantitation below detection limit
F = Quantitated by GC/FTD; data not in duplicate.
M = Quanticated by GC/MS.
*Corrected for the blank value.
OCACOFPCRA'X':
Technology Division
B-6
-------
Project
1-628-037
GCA Control No. 41528 (duplicate)
DATA REPORT SHEET
Qualitative Compounds*
Sample I.D. EWR-EN-IA
Analysis Date 12/4/84 (FID) 12/7/84 (MS)
Sample Matrix Water Instrument .HP 5985 GC/MS Sample Dilution 1 ul DI_(FID)
.lll_ 5 89 0._ CC/FID ^ 1:100 FT .(MS )
Parameter
Allvl Alcohol
Bis(chloromethYl)ether_,
Cyclohexane
Cyclohexanone
1,,2-DibrQmoethane
Dichlorodif luorome thane
Biethyl ether __ .
Ethyln acetate „
Ethyl7acrylate _
Concentration
(wg/1)
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
-.-•
Parameter
Furfural
Isobutyl alcohol
Methyl acetate ,_
Methyl alcohol
Methyl methacrylate
n-Butyl alcohol
n-Propyl benzene
Tetrahydrofuran . .
Trichlorof luoromethane _
1,1,2-Trichloro-
1,2^2-trif luoroethane_
Trifluoroethane ....
Concentration
(yg/1)
ND
ND
ND
f ND
ND
JiP
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
*Concentration based on a comparison of the total ion area of the compound with
that of the internal standard.
NA = Not analyzed by purge and trap
PT = Purge and Trap
DI = Direct Injection
ND » < 1000 yg/1
ug/1 = ppb (for density of water = 1)
GCA
CCA CORPORATION
Technology Division
B-7
-------
Project
1-628-037
GCA Control No.
41532
DATA REPORT SHKETS
Purgeables
Sample I.D.
Analysis Date r
(MS) 12/4/84 (FID'
Sample Matrix Water Instrument HP,5985 GC/MS Sample Dilution 1 ylDI (FID)
H? "5890 GC/FID i:50Q ?T (MS)
Parameter
Chlorome thane
Bromone thane
Vinyl chloride
Chloroethane
Methvlene chloride
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
1 , 1-Dicnloroethene
1 , 1-Dichloroethane
Trans-1 ,2-dichloroethene
Chloroform
2-Butanone
1,1, 1-Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloridc
Bromodichloromethane
Total xylenes
Concentration
(ug/1)
ND*
, ND
ND*
ND
23000M
Parameter
1,1 ,2^2-Tetrachloroethane
1 ,2-Dichlcrooropane
Trans-1 ,3-Dichloropropone
Teichloroethene
Dibromochlorome thane
70000F 1 Benzena
220M (K)
ND
ND
ND.
ND
76450M*
cis-1 ,3-Dichloropropene
2-Chloroothvl vinvl ethar
Bromoform
4-Methvl-2-pentanone
Tetrachloroethpne
Toluene
ND IChlorobenzene
ND
ND
Ethvlbunr.enp
Stvrene
Concentration
(ug/1)
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO*
ND
10000M
490M CO
81000F
1900M (K)
NH
ND
PT « Purge and Trap
DI = Direct Injection
ND = < 5000 jig/1
ND* = < 10,000 yg/1
ug/1 = ppb (for density of water = 1)
K = Quantitation below detection limit
M = Quantitated by GC/MS.
F = Quantitated by GC/FID.
*Corrected for the blank value.
B-8
GCA
.
Technology Division
-------
Project
1-628-037
CCA Control No. 41532
DATA REPORT SHEET
Qualitative Compounds*
Sample I.D.
Analysis Date ...12/12/84 (MS) 12/4/84 (FID)
Sample Matrix Water Instrunent HP 5985 GC/MS Sample Dilution 1 nl PI (FID)
589.0. G.cyFID 1:500 PT (MS)
Parameter
Allvl Alcohol
Bisichloromethyl) ether
Cyclohexane _r
Cvclohexanone
1 „ 2-Dibromoethane
Dichlorgdif luoronethane
Diethyl ether
Ethyl acetate
Ethyl-acrylate
2— Hexanone
Concentration
(ng/1)
ND
NU
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1700M-- (K)
•
Parameter
Furfural
Isobutvl alcohol
Methyl acetate
Methyl^alcohol
Methvl methacrvlate
n-Butyl alcohol
n-Propyl benzene . .
Tetrahydrofuran
. TrichJorof luorqmethane
!JlJ2-Trichloro-
1 ,2 ,2-trif luqroethan^
. Trif luoroethane ..
Concentration
-------
Project
1-623-037
GCA Control No. 41532 (Matrix Spike)
DATA REPORT SHEETS
Purgeables
Sample I.D. EWR-EN-2A
Analysis Date _^12/12/84 (MS) 12/4/84 (FID)
Sample Matrix Liquid Instrument HP,5935 GC/MS Sample Dilution 1 ul PI (FID)
JP_5890_GC/FTD 1:500 FT (MS)
Parameter
Chloromethane^ _
Bromomethane
Vinyl chloride
Chloroethane
Methylene chloride
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
1 , 1-Dichloroethene
1 , l-Dichloroethane
Trans-1 ,2-dichloroethene
Chloroform
2-Butanone
1,1, 1-Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Bromodichlorome thane
Total xvlenes
Concentration
(ug/1)
ND*
ND 1
ND*
ND
30000M
70000F
250M (K)
ND
NI)
ND-'
ND
68450M*
ND
N!)
ND
ND
Parameter
lil^^-Tetrachloroethane
1 ,2-Dichloropropane
Trans-1 , 3-D ichioroprgpene
Tjichloroethene
Dibromochlorome thane
Benzene
cis-1 ,3-Dichlorooronene
2-Chloroethvl vinyl ether
Broinoform
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethvlbenzene
Stvrene
Concentration
(ug/1)
ND
N'6
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND*
ND
[ 5000M
23000M
81000F
ND
ND
ND
PT = Purge and Trap
DI = Direct Injection
ND = < 5,000 yg/1
ND* = < 10,000 uz/1
ug/1 = ppb (for density of water = 1)
K = Quantitation below detection limit
M = Quantitated by GC/MS.
F = Quantitated by GC/FID.
*Corrected for the blank value.
B-10
GCA
fV.A CORPORA nor:
Technology Civision
-------
Project
1-628-037
GCA Control No. 41532 (Matrix Spike)
DATA REPORT SHEET
Qualitative Compounds*
Sample I.D. EWR-EN-2A
Analysis Date 12/12/84 (MS) 12/4/84 (FID)
Sample Matrix Liquid Instrument HP 5985 GC/MS Sample Dilution Aj*A_D_I_j.FID)
HP 5890 GC/FTD 1:500 PT (MS)
Parameter
AllYl Alcohol
Bis(chlororaeehyllether
Cyclohexane
Cvclohexanone
1^2-Dibromoe thane
Bichlorod if luorome thane
Biethyl ether
Ethyl acetate .
Ethyl, acrylate
Concentration
(wg/1)
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
••
Parameter
Furfural
Isobutyl alcohol
Methyl acetate
Methyl alcohol
Methyl methacrvlate
Concentration
(ug/1)
ND
^JD
ND
ND
ND
n-Butyl alcohol 1 ND .. _.
n-Propyl benzene
ND
Tetrahydrofuran 1 ND
Trj.chlorof luoromejhane J. . ND
1,1,2-TrichlQro-
. . 1,2,,2-trif luoroethane
Tr if luoroe thane
ND
ND
^Concentration based on a comparison of the total ion area of the compound with
that of the internal standard.
NA
• Not analyzed-by purge and trap
PT = Purge and Trap
DI = Direct Injection
ND = < 5000 yg/L
ug/1 = ppb (for density of water = 1)
B-ll
GCA
CCA ooRPo
Technology Division
-------
Project
1-62S-037
GCA Control No.
41536
DATA REPORT SHEETS
Purgeables
Sample I.D.
Analysis Date 12/4/84 (FID) 12/7/84 (MS)
Sample Matrix Liquid Instrument HP 5985 GC/MS Sample Dilution .1 yl. PI (FID)
Jff ^89JL_GC/FID 1:25 FT (MS)
Parameter
Chlororaethane
Bromomethane
Vinyl chloride
Chloroethane
Methylene ^chloride
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
1 , 1-Dichloroethene
1 , l-Dichlorouthane
Trans- 1,,2-dichloroethene
Chloroform
2-Butanone
1,1, 1-Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Bromodichloromethane
Total xvlenes
Concentration
(ug/1)
ND*
ND
ND*
ND
610
13000
ND
ND
Parameter
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1 ,2-Dichlorooropane
Trans-l,3-Dichloropropene
Trichloroethene
Dibromochlorome thane
Benzene
cis-l,3-Dichloroorooene
2-Chloroethyl vinvl ether
150 (K) iBromoform
ND' l4-Methvl-2-pentanone
ND** iTetrachloroethene
ND** (Toluene
550 IChlorobenzene
ND
ND
1100
Ethvlbenzene
Styrene
Concentration
(ug/1)
89
ND
ND
170 (K)
30 (K)
66
ND
ND*
ND
ND*
310
1700
100 (K)
440
ND
PT = Purge and Trap
DI » Direct Injection
ND = < 250 yg/1
ND* = < 500 yg/1
ug/1 = ppfa (for density of water = 1)
K = Quantitation below detection limit
All values quantitatud by CC/MS.
Blank contamination was observed for this compound.
B-12
GCA
CCA CORPORA riCM
Technology Division
-------
Project
1-628-037
GCA Control No. > 1.536
DATA REPORT SHEET
Qualitative Compounds*
Sample I.D.
EWR-ES-1A
Analysis Date ^12/4/84 (FID) 12/7/84 (MS)
Sample Matrix Liquid
Instrument HP 5
-------
Project
1-62S-037
CCA Control No.
41540
DATA REI-OKT SHKKTS
Purgosbles
Sample I.D.
Analvsis Date 12/4/84 (FID) 12/7/84 (MS)
Sample Matrix Liquid Instrument _KP_5235_CO/;-SS_ S.inplc- Dilution 1^1 PI (FID)
1:50 PT (MS)
Parameter
Chloromethane
Broraoraetliane
Vinvl chloride
Chlorocthane
Methylene chloride
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
Concentration
Ug/1)
1200
Ni)
ND*
ND
ND
12000
ND
Pjviinoter
lij:J12,2-Tt;trachloroeth2ne
1 t2-Dicl>loropropanc
Trans-1 ,3-Dichloronronsne
TrLchloroo.lhtMie
Dihroraochloromethanc1
3enzena , , . ^jr T ^.. .
cis-1.3-Dichloronrcpene
Concentration
(ug/1)
ND
Ni)
ND
31 OK
i\TD
ND
I ND
1,, 1-Dichloroethene
N'D
ND*
1 , 1-Dichloroethane
Trans-1 ,2-dichloroethene
Chloroform
2-Butanone
1,1, 1-Trichloroethar.e
Carbon tetrachloride
Bromod ich loronethanc
Total xvlenes
ND
ND
ND**
1845*
650
N'D
ND
1300
Bromoform
^-Methyl-2-pentanonc
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
.'ilyrciu:
ND
300K
430K
2200
100K
540
ND
PT = Purge and Trap
DI = Direct Injection
ND = < 500 ;iv-/l
ND* = < 1000 yg/1
u£/l = ppb (for density of water = 1)
K = Quantitation below detection licit
All data quantitated by GC/MS
ND*it = Blank contamination was observed for this compound
*Corrected for the blank value
B-14
£^.1?^ A '""•'''"< CO
v&'\j£&, Technology Division
G.'-N A 37
U/A
-------
Project 1-623-037
GCA Control No.
DATA RF.PORT SIIEKT
Qualitative Compounds*
Sample I.D. .S^SlS
Sample Matrix Liquid
Analysis Date 12/4/84 (FID) 12/7/84 (MS)
Instrument ,_?lP,.59_g5__GC/HS_ Sample Dilution 1 ul PI (FID)
PI (MS)
Parameter
Allyl_Alcohol
Bis (chloromethyl) ether
Cyclohexane
Cyclohexanone
1,,2-Dibromoethane
Dichlo rod if luorome thane
Diethyl ether
Ethyl . acetate^
Ethyl acrylate
Concentration
(ug/1)
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
.;'!
Parameter
Furfural
Isobutyl alcohol
Methyl acetate
Methyl alcohol
Methyl methacrylate. _ .
n-Butyl alcohol
n-Propyl benzene
Tetrahvdrofuran
I Trichlorof luoromethane
lJiJ2-Trichloro-
1,,2,2-trifluoroethane
Tr if luoroe thane
Concentration
(ug/1)
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
^Concentration based on a comparison of the total ion area of the compound with
that of the internal standard.
NA = Not analyzed by purge and trap
PT = Purge and Trap
DI = Direct Injection
ND
<500 ug/1
ug/1 = ppb (for density of water = 1)
B-15
im* -*IT *m*^
GCA
Technology Division
-------
Project
1-628-037
CCA Control No.
41546
Sample I.D.
DATA REPORT SHKETS
Purgeables
Analysis Date
Sample Matrix Water Instrument _HP_5985_GC/MS Sample Dilution 1 nl PI
Parameter
Chloromethane
Bromome thane
Vinvl chloride
Chlo roe thane
Methvlene chloride
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
lj 1-Dichloroethene
1 , 1-Dichloroethane
Trans-1 ,2-dichloroethene
Chloroform
2— Eutanone
lj I* 1-Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
B '• jmodichloromethane
Total xylenes
Concentration
(ug/1)
ND*
ND
ND*
ND
ND .
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND,
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Parameter
. 1 ., 1 12 ,,2-Tetrachloroethane
1 ,2-Dichlorooropane
Trans-1, 3-Dichloroproner.e
Trichloroethene
DibromochloromeChani*
Benzene
^cis-l^S-Dichloropro^ene
.2-Chloroethyl vinvl eth^r
Bromoform
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Tetrachloroethene
.Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethvlbenzene
Styrene
Concentration
(yg/1)
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1 ND*
ND
ND*
ND
1 ND
ND
ND
ND
PT = Purge and Trap
DI » Direct Injection
ND = < 10 ug/1
ND* = < 20 ug/1"
ug/1 = ppb (for density of water = 1)
K = Quantisation below detection limit
B-16
GCA
CCA CO
Te-hnology Division
-------
Project
1-623-C37
GCA Control No. 41546
DATA REPORT SHEET
Qualitative Compounds*
Sanple I.D. SC-FC-1C
Analysis Date 12/4/84
Sa-r.ple Matrix Water Instrument HP 59B5 CC/MS Sample Dilution 1_y 1 _ DI__
Parameter
Allvl Alcohol
B is (chloronethyl) ether
Cyclghexane. _T
CYC lohexanone _
l,2-Dibromoethane_
D ichlorod if luorome thane
Diethyl ether __
Ethyl acetate _
Ethyl, acrylate-
Concentration
(ug/1).
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Parameter
Fuffural
IsobutYl alcohol
Methvl acetate
Methyl alcohol
Methyl methacrvlate
n-Butyl alcohol
n-Propyl benzene
Tettahydrofuran
Trichlorof luoronethane .
1,1,2-Trich-loro-
1,,2,,2-trifluoroethane .
Trif Juoroethane
Concentration
(ug/D
ND •
ND
ND
ND
ND
f ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
^Concentration, based en a comparison of the total ion area of the compound with
that of the internal standard.
NA s Not analyzed by purge and trap
PT = Purge and Trap
DI = Direct Injection
ND = < 10 ug/1
ug/1 = ppb (for density of water = 1)
B-17
.•a/a A CCA CORPORATION-
\fy\syJ&. Technology Division
GCA
-------
Project
i-628-037
Ci:A Control No.
41550
DATA REPORT SHKKTS
Pureeablt-s
Sample I.D. JUL^Jl __________________ Analysis Date ___ J.2/.4/.8.4
Sample Matrix Water ___ Instrument _HF_J2§2_Gc;/^§_ Snrcple Dilution 1
PI
Parameter
Chlorome thane
Bromcnethane
Vinyl chloride
Chloroethane
Methvlene chloride
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
1 , 1-Dichloroethene
1 , 1-Dichloroethane
Trans-1 ,2-dichloroethene
Chloroform
2-Butanone
1,1, 1-Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Bromod ich loromethane
Total xvlenes
Concentration
(ug/1)
ND*
ND
ND*
ND
ND
ND
ND j
ND
ND
NO-
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Parameter
I Al,2A2-Tetrachloroethan9
1 ,2-Dichlorooropane
Trans-1 ,3-Dichloropronene
Trichloroethene
DibrotnochloroTnejhane
Benzene
cis-1.3-Dichlorot?roDene
2-Chloroethvl vinvl ether
BroTnofom
4-McthYl-2-oentanone
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
Stvrene
1
Concentration
(ug/1)
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND*
ND
. ND*
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
PT = Purge and Trap
DI = Direct Injection
ND = < 10 ug/1
ND* = < 20 ug/1
ug/1 = ppb (for density of water = 1)
K = Quantisation belcw detection limit
B-18
GCA
' .1 A i'.(.t~Pi .f(Af!< .::
Technology Division
-------
Prnjt'Ct
N...
Sample I.D. SE^G^IC
DATA REPORT SHEET
Qualitative Compounds*
Analysis Date
Sample Matrix Water Instrument ^HP,5985 GC/MS_ Sample Dilution ^.H1 DI_
Parameter
Ally! Alcohol
B is (chlorome thy 1) ether
Cyclqhexane^
Cyclghexanone
1 . 2-Dibromoethane
Dichlorodif luoromethane
Diethyl ether
Ethyl acetate
Ethyl acrvlate
Concentration
(•~g/l)
ND
ND
ND
NH
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
••:
Parameter
Furfural
Isobutyl alcohol
Methyl acetate
.MvShyl oK-ohyl .
Methyl methacrylate
n-Butyl alcohol
n-Propyl benzene
Tetrahydrofuran . . .
Trichlorof luoromethane
1,1,2-Trichloro-
1,2,2-trifluoroethane
Trif luoroethane
Concentration
(«g/l)
ND
ND
KD
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Concentration based on a comparison of the total ion area of the compound with
that of the internal standard.
NA * Not analyzed, by purge and trap
PT = Purge and Trap
DI = Direct Injection
ND = < 10 ug/1
ug/1 = ppb (for density of water = 1)
B-19
GCA
CCACOFPCPAHCr;
Technology Division
-------
Project.
1-628-037
CCA Con:rot No.
DATA RiiPOHT SlUiKTS
Pur^eables
Sample I.D. ____W£l§L;lD__^ Analysis Date 12/4/84
Sample Matrix .Water Instrument _HP_5985.JSC/MS_ Sample Dilution 1 vl PI.
Parameter
Chlororaethane
Brotnomethane
Vinvl chloride
Chloroethane
Methvlene chloride
Acetone
Carbon dtsulfide
1 , 1-Dichloroethene
Concentration
(fcg/1)
Nl)*
ND
NO*
Nl)
ND
ND
ND J
ND
Parameter
lj 1.,2,2-Tetrachloroetliane
1 ,2-Dichloroprooane
Trans-1 ,3-Dichlorooropene
Trichloroethene
Dibroraochlorome thane
Benzene
c is-1 ,3-Dichloropropene
2-Chloroeth¥l vinvl ether
Concentration
(Kg/D
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND*
1.1-DichlQroethane
Tr3ns^l,2-dichloroetheng
ND-,
Chloroforn
I
ND
iTfltrachloroethgne
ND
2-Butanone i
1,1 ,1-Trichloroethane 1
Carbon tetrachloride 1
Bromcdichloromethane •.
ND
ND
ND
m
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
Stvrene
KD
ND
ND
ND
Total xylenes
PT = Purge and Trap
DI = Direct Injection
ND = < 10 ug/1
ND* = < 20 ug/1
ND
.J.
ug/1 = ppb (for density of water = 1)
K = Quantitation below detection limit
B-20
GCA
__
TechrioJogy Division
-------
Project
1-623-037
GCA Control No. 41556
DATA REPORT SHEET
Qualitative Compounds*
Sample I.D.
WC-SL-1D
Analysis Date
Sample Matrix Water Instrument HP 5985 GC/MS Sample Dilution 1 ill PI
Parameter
Allvl Alcohol
Bis(chloromethYl) ether
Cyclohexane
.Cyclohexanone
J.^-Dibromoe thane
Bichlorodif luoromethane
Diethyj ether
Ethyl acetate
Ethyl acrvlate
Concentration
(pg/1)
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
•••'
Parameter
Furfural • . . . .
Isobutyl alcohol
[ Methyl, acetate..
Concentration
(ug/l)
ND
ND
ND
Methvl alcohol .1 ND
Methvl methac^ylate
n-Butyl alcohol
n-ProDvl benzene
Tetrahydrofuran
T^ichlorof luoromethane .
1,1^2-Trichlorg-
1^2,2-trif luoroethane
£rif luoroethane
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Concentration based on a comparison of the total ion area of the compound with
that of the internal standard.
NA = Not analyzed by purge and trap
PT = Purge and Trap
DI = Direct Injection
ND
< 10 ug/1
ug/l = ppb (for density of water - 1)
B-21
GCA
GCA CORPORATION
Technology Division
-------
Project
1-62S-037
GCA Control No.
41559
DATA REPORT SHEETS
Purgeables
Sample I.D. WC-SL-2B
Analysis Date
Sample Matrix Water Instrument _HP .5985 GC/MS Sample Dilution _l_iil_ _DT
Parameter
Chloromethane
Bromome thane
?hwl chloride^
Chloroethane
Methvlene chloride
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
1 , 1-D ichloroethene
1,1-Dichloroethane
Trans-1 .2-dichloroethene
Chloroform
2-Butanone
1,1, 1-Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Bromodichloromethane
Total xvlenes
Concentration
(ug/1)
m*
ND
ND*
ND
ND
ND
ND
N?D
ND
NO/'
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Parameter
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1 ,2-Dichlorooropane
Trans-1 ,3-Dichloropropene
Tcichloroethene
Dibromochlorome thane
Benzene
cis-1 ,3-Dichlorooropene
2-Chioroethyl vinvl ether
Bromoform
r4-Methvl-2-pentanone
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethvlbenzene
Stvrene
Concentration
Ug/1)
ND
N6
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND*
ND
ND*
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
PT « Purge and Trap
DI = Direct Injection
ND = < 10 ug/1
ND* = < 20 ug/1
ug/1 = ppb (for density of water = 1)
K = Quantitation below detection limit
B-22
GCA
A r;or •
Technology Division
-------
Project
1-628-037
CCA Control No._41559
DATA REPORT SHEET
Qualitative Compounds*
Sample I.D. WC-SL-2B
Analysis Date 12/A/84
Sample Matrix Water Instrument HP 5985 GC/MS Sample Dilution 1 ul PI
Parameter
AllYl_Alcphol
Bis (ch Joromethynether,.^
Cyclpbesane^,.^ t_ ___
Cyclohexanone
IjZ-Dibromoethane .
pichlorodifluoromethane ^
pif£]iYli_ether__1.ri_T1,T __.
£thyl acetate
Ethyl acrylate
Concentration
(pg/1)
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
. "f
Parameter
Furfural
Isobutvl alcohol
Methyl acetate
Methyl alcohol
Methyl methacrvlate_
n-3utyl alcohol
n-Prgpvl benzene
Tetrahydrofuran
Trichlorof luorome thane
1.1.2-Trichloro-
1,2, 2-trif luoroethane^
Tr if iuoroe thane
Concentration
(ug/1)
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
*Concentration based on a comparison of the total ion area of the compound with
that cl' the internal standard.
NA = Not analyzed by purge and trap
PT = Purge and Trap
DI = Direct Injection
ND
< 10 ug/1
ug/1 = ppb (for density of water = 1)
B-23
-^^ ~^mr- *^™^
GCA
GCA COFPOPATICN
Technology Division
-------
Project 1-628-031
GCA Control Me.
41562
DATA REPORT SHEET
Headspace Analysis
Sample I.D.
MP.-RB-1
Analysis Date 2/21/85
Sample Matrix
Soil Core
Instrument HP5985 GC/MS
Sample Dilution
N.A.
C. A. S .
Number
74-87-3
74-83-9
75-01-4
75-00-3
75-09-2
67-64-1
75-15-0
75-35-4
75-34-3
156-60-5
67-66-3
78-93-3
71-55-6
56-23-5
75-27-4
*
Parameter
Ch lor ome thane
Bromomethane
Vinyl Chloride
Chloroethane
Methylene Chloride
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
1 , 1-Dichloroethylene
1 / 1-Dichloroethane
Trans-1 , 2-dichloroethylene
Chloroform
2-Butanone (MEK)
1,1, .L-Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Bromodich lor ome thane
Total xylenes
Concentration
(ug/g)
ND
ND
ND
ND
28
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
v^> • A • t* •
Number
79-34-5
78-87-5
10061-2-6
79-01-6
124-48-1
71-43-2
10061-01-5
110-75-8
75-25-2
108-10-1
127-18-4
108-88-3
108-90-7
100-41-4
100-42-5
Parameter
1,1,2, 2-Tetrachloroethane
1 , 2-Dichloropropane
Trans-1, 3-dichloropropylene
Trichloroethylene
Dibromechlorome thane
Benzene
cis-1, 3-Dichloroproovlene
2-Chloroethvlvinylether
Bromoform
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
Tetrachloroethylene
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
Styrene
Concentratit
(ug/g)
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
"9/8
ND = < 5.0 ug/g
K «= Quantitation below detection limit
*C.A.S. Numbers for xylene isomers are as follows: ortho- 95-47-6, meta- 108-38-3, para- 106-42-3
GCA
•••"•* conn: ~
Technology Divisicii
-------
Project 1-628-037
GCA Control No.
41562
DATA REPORT SHEET
Headapace Analysis
Additional Compounds
Sample I.D.
WC-SB-1
Sample Matrix Soil Core
Instrument HP5985 GC/MS
Analysis Date
2/21/85
Sample Dilution_
N.A.
V— • f\ • O *
Number
75-05-8
107-18-6
542-88-1
110-82-7
108-94-1
106-93-4
75-71-8
60-29-7
141-78-6
140-88-5
Parameter
Acetonitrile
Allyl Alcohol
Bis ( chloromethyl )ether
Cyclohexane
Cyclohexanone
1 , 2-Dibromoethane
Dichlorod if luorome thane
Diethyl ether
Ethyl acetate
Ethyl acrylate
Concentration
(ug/g )
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
(•*• • A • o •
. Number
98-01-1
78-83-1
79-20-9
67-56-1
79-41-4
71-36-3
103-65-1
109-99-9
75-69-4
76-13-1
420-26-2
Parameter
Furfural
Isobutyl alcohol
Methyl acetate
Methyl alcohol
Methyl methacrylate
n-Butyl alcohol
n-Propyl benzene
Tetrahydrofuran
Trichlorof luorome thane
1,1,2-Trichloro-
1,2, 2-trif luoroethane
1,1, 1-Trif luoroethane
Concentration
(ug/g)
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
I
ro
Ui
Concentrations based on a comparison of the total ion area of the compound with that of the internal
standard.
ug/g = ppb
ND = < 5.0 ug/g
K = Quantitation below detection limit
GCA
'S ./• CORPO:'
Technology Division
-------
APPENDIX C
RADIAN CORPORATION
DATA REPORT FORMS
C-l
-------
Fin.o in NO: 41SJO
SAMI'LT CONTROL NO: 42114-3
IVPC: Llouin
DATE SAMPLED:
OAU ANALYZED:
11/13/04
01/21/85
C3MTOUNO
CONCENTRATION
IHS/L>»
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION
IN6-C/HL) IHG/D*
I'tRAFFlNS
ETHANC
ll-PCril AWT
riL3i«Ex«NE
2, J-nlKLlHYLbUTANE
^-nr THYLPENTANf
N-HEXAUC
•«r iHYiCYCLOPENTAfir
CYCLOHEXAME
N-HEPI ANE
Hr.THYlCYCLOHEXANE
2.5-OIM.tTHYl.HEX ANE
3-METMrLHEPTAMC
i.5.*\ — TR i M r T H v i iirviur
*. Ictn'n |nL|i'll_''l-W*rll.
N-3CTANt
M-'n"AHr
N-nr.CAN£
CT ALKANC
CO ALKAIIE
CIO« ALKANE
cio« ALKANE
C10« ALKANE
OLfF INS
t-Z-HEXENE
I-OCTENC
C1) ALKENE
TOTAL AROHATICS
TOLUENE
rT»'YLBEN?ENE
I'-XYLENE/M-XYLEME
1-vYl.fNE
TOTAL HALOr.ENATEn (1C
IR ICIILOROf LOROHt" THANE
HCTI'YLfflE CI'LORIOE
IA) ARTIFACT COMPOUND - CONCEHTHAT
(II) VAHIAMLE RrCOVr»Y TMROUSI' ORYI
(C> CONCENJRAT IONS W£RE CALCULATED
257.0
311.0
96.2
464.0
1326.0
11200.0
223.0
513.0
110.0
125. C
1510.0
193.0
n n 4 n
kl U ^ • II
353.0
334.0
190.0
1150.0
574.0
600.0
219.0
732.0
1410.0
530.0
3260.0
43600.0
906. C
941.0
307.0
14.5
1310.0
0.322
0.374
0.1 IS
0.556
1.5b8
12.212
0.261
0.600
0.131
0.146
1.796
0.232
0& 1 A
• D f '
0.420
0.397
0.225
1.366
0.682
0.711
0.260
o.efrfl
1.649
0.619
3.H09
47.804
1.J02
1.041
0.340
O.I65IAI
9.268
TON HOT USED IN TOTAL UMHC
NS SYSTEM - CONCENTRATIONS
USING VALUES OF
6 FOR THE
TOTAL HALOGENATCO HC ICONT'O)
1 t2-OICI'LOROET"ANr
Itlil-TRICHLOROETHANC
TRICMLCROETHYLENE * BROHODICHLOROHETHANE
01CHLOROKETHYL ETHER
ltli2-TRlCHLOROCT»ANE
TETRACHLOROETHYLENf
CHLOROOENZCNC
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
UNIpENTIFlEO HALOGENATEO HC
UNIDENTIFIED HALOGENATEO HC
TOTAL OXYGENATED HCIB)
ACCTONE
DUTANOME
PARAFFINS
OLEFINS
TOTAL AROHATICS
TOTAL HALOGENATCO HC
TOTAL OXYGENATED HC
TOTAL NHHC
CALCULATIONS.
NOT USED IK TOTAL NMHC CALCULATIONS.
CARBON NIIHBER Aim B6 FOR THE MOLECULAR HEIGHT.
2.6
739.0
75.7
9.9
23.0
20.8
400.0
39.2
6.6
3.6
27*00.0
8960.0
19986.2
5200.0
45754.0
2630.4
36766.0
73570.6
O.PI1
4.100
0.414
0.047
O.I2B
0.144
0.626
0.162
0.021
0.011
44.P66
13.4S9
23.936
6.P78
50.187
14.939
58.325
-------
o
co
FIELD ID NO: 4I1S3
SArfLI"
SAHl'l E
fONIROL
TYPE:
so:
4204-5
DATE SAMPLED: 11/13/04
DATE AKALY/ED: 01/21/05
LIQUID
m
CT»'FOUNO
PARAFFINS
C-? VIC
H-T'IT ANE
.MEOMEXANr
?. l-OinCTHYLIUITAMC
CONCENTRATION
(N".-C/HL> IH'i/L
^-METIIYLPfNTANE
N-HEXAHE
2 t4-OIHETHYLPEMT ANE
CYCL3MC.XAME
T-HETHYLI'EXANC
2.2.4-tR IMETHYLPENTANE
vCTHYLCYCLOHEXANr
J-MMHYLHE PTANT
J(2.5-TRIHETMYLHCXAME
N-HTNANf
fl-OECAHE
ci ALKANE
C7 ALKANT
CP ALKA»!E
tin* ALKA'IC
CIO* ALKAftf
CIO* ALKAME
ourr i us
T-2-PENTEHE
?-HCIMYL-2-DUTrNE
I-2-MEXENE
TOTAL AROHATICS
TOLIKNE
•'-yYLfNE/H-XYLEf.'E
183. 0
1650.0
302.0
64.2
71.3
204.9
71RO.O
216.0
' 166.0
204.0
923.0
656.0
1100. 0
314.0
690.0
214.0
61. 5
104.0
41A.O
437.0
215.0
132.0
216.3
324.0
6540.0
2R7.0
B10.0
259(10. 0
230.0
0.214
1.9H5
0.362
0.077
0.085
0.244
A. 596
0.253
0.196
0.344
1.101
0.7PO'
1.266
0.374
0.922
0.255
0.073
0.123
0.499
0.521
0.256
0.157
0.256
0.364
7.641
0.279
0.947
26.397
0.263
COMPOUND
TOTAL MALOGENATED HC
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
1(1 tl-TRICHLOROCTHANE
If1-OICMLOH3ETMANE
TOTAL OXYGENATED HC(B)
_.,..._-._____.____
ACETONE
2-PRDPANOL
OUTANONC
PARATFIHS •
OLCFINS
TOTAL AROHATICS
TOTAL HALOGCNATCO HC
TOTAL OXYGENATED HC
TOVAL NHMC
C'ONCCNTRAT ION
(NR-C/HLI (HG/L><
Plt.O
56.6
20. 3
13600.0
1470.0
4170.0
16135.0
7637.0
2613B.O
952.9
19240.0
JO
i ma
6.198
0.315
0.064
21.949
2.454
6.264
19.345
(I.P6R
26.661
6.596
30.£67(0)
50A62.9 63.469
M) ARTIFACT CIMPOtlNf) - CONCENTRATION NOT USCD IN TOTAL NMMC CALCIIL AT IOHS.
cm vAMAnLC nimvE'-'Y TIUCUOM CPYIKT SYSTLH - CONCENTRATIONS NJT usrn IN TOTAL NMMC CALCULATIONS.
(c> court diiiAt ions UCRE CALCULAIED USING VALUES or 6 FOR IMC CARODN NUHDER Aim nt, FOR IMC MOLECULAR WEIGHT.
• UHlir, ART EOIIIVALCNT T •» FPH ASSUMING A DENSITY OF I.
-------
nun in NO: 41537
SAMPLE CONTROL HO! 4204-6
SAMPLE net: unuin
DATE SAMPLED: 11/is/nt
DATE ANALYZED: oi<
CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION
C IMPOUND
PARAFFIN1!
N-PfNT ANE
3-MrTHYLPENTAHF
N-i'E XANE
J-METHYLHEPTAflE
2,2|5-TP1METHYLHEXANF
N-3C 1 ANE
N-M3NANE
C« ALKAIIf
C9 ALKANE
CIO« ALKAME
C10> ALKANE
C10» ALKA'IE
CIO* ALKAHE
C13« ALKANE
OLCFIfK
2,4,4-lH IME-2-PENTENE
LIHONFNE
T3TAL AR3MATICS
TOLIIFNF
ETHYLDENZENE
P-XYLENE/H-XYLrilE
CIO* AROMATIC
TOTAL HALOUNATEf) HCf
HEIMYLENE CHLORIDE
Itltl-TRKHLOROETHANE
1 . 1 -niCMLOROCTMANt
fNfi-C/HL)
1360.0
1R2.0
129. 0
236.0
110.0
loa.o
193.0
I2A.O
316.0
104.0
61.0
11. 0
389. 0
374.0
2B4.0
89. 9
5350.0
744.0
365.0
55.5
104.0
15.6
7.5
IHC/D* COMPOUND ING-C/KL) (IIG/D*
PARAFFINS 3761.0 4.507
niJTPiuc v^to AfciA
DLLr INS 3r3»7 0 • lo^
1.637 TOTAL AROMATICS 6514.5 7.155
0.21D' TOTAL "ALOGENATEO HC 127.1 0.853
0.154 TOTAL OXYGENATED HC 24RO.O 4.002(0)
0.2R1
0.147 TOTAL NHHC IP776.5 12.949
0.128
0.229
0.152
0.375-
0.123
O.U72
O.OB4
0.461
0.444
0.332
0.102
5.A66
O.B23
0.404
0.062
0.736
0.067
0.031
TOTAL OXYOENATEn HCIOJ
-••••.•..-•.•.••••• •
ACE I ONE
9
?480.0
4.002
IA) ARTIFACT COMPOUND • CONCENTRAT ICN NOT USEH IN TOTAL NMI-C CALCULATIONS.
«ni VARIABLE RtroVEPY THROUGH DPYINt SYSTEM - CONCEN1HAT IONS NOT USED IK TOTAL NHHC CALCULATIONS.
1C) CONCENTRATIONS MERE CALCULATED USING VALUES OF 6 FOR THE CAROON NUHdER AND P6 FOR THE MOLECULAR WEIGHT.
• UNITS ARE EQUIVALENT T2 PPM ASSIlHIMS A DENSITY OF I.
-------
?
Ln
F ICLD ID NO:
SAMPLE COHTFOL no: 4204-«
SAMPLE TYPE: LIOUID
DATE SAMPLED:
DATE ANALYZED:
11/13/B4
CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION /
coMpnuttn
OARA.MNS
N-ntNTANE
NED'IEXANE
KETHYLCYCLOPENTANF
3i4-OIMCTHYLPENTANC
'l-OCTANc
N-'UNAHC
N-OECAHE
CIO* ALKANE
CIO* ALKANE
Cin* ALKAME
on* ALKANF
CIO* ALKANE
OLCFI'IS
C-2-OCTEHE
CIO* ALKINE
TOTAL AR3MATICS
TOLUENE
MHYLQE'IZENE
P-XYLENE/M-XYLENE
•"-XYLENE
TOTAL HALOSENATEO HC
TH ICMLOROFLOHOMLTI'ANF
TETRACMLOROEIHYLENE
1 ,1-niCMLOROETMANE
I1TAL OXYCtNATED HC«n>
ACE TOUE
IIUI ANONE
INr,-C/ML)
•»77.0
3R3.0
61 .7
44.8
262.0
196.0
133.0
116.0
92.0
95.9
64.0
222.3
85.1
254.3
1020.0
192.0
337.0
137.0
166.0
5.2
16.7
"030.0
466.0
(M« COMPOUND (NC-C/ML) IMG/LI*
PARAFFUIS 2447.4 2.921
OLCFINS 339.3 0.397
0.935 TOTAL AROHATKS 1666.0 1.655
0.459 TOTAL HAI.OCENATEO HC 21.9 0.105
0.072 TOTAL OXYGENATED HC 8516.0 13.690(11)
0.053
0.312 TOTAL NMHC 4494.6 5.277
0.233
0.159
0.138
0.109
0.114
O.U76
0.2*3
0.100
0.297
I .lie
0.212
0.373
0.152
I.8RBIA)
O.J36
0.369
12.960
0.730
m
IAI A1IIFACT COHPflllNn - CONCENTRAI IOK NOT tl^CO IN TOTAL NM|iC CALCULATIONS.
mi vAitiAiiiT RECOVEHY Timoiicu DRYiun rrsiEM - COUCENTRAI IONS NOT USED if TOTAL NHCC CALCULATIONS.
(C) C3'.'CrNTRAT11HS 'JE«E CALTIILATEO USIfIG VALUES OF 6 FCR THE CAROON NUHIIER AND B6 FOR THE MOLECULAR WEIGHT.
UNITS ARE EQUIVALENT TO PPM A'SIIMINS A DENSITY OF I.
-------
nrir in NO: 4154B
SAMPLE CONTROL HO! 4201-13
TYPC: LJOOIO
UATE SAMPLED:
DATE ANALYZED:
11/13/84
01/21/85
C3MPOUNO
CONCI.NTRATIOII
IWi-C/MD IH3/D*
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION
(NG-C/ML) (MG/L)'
tea
PARAFF IN?
3-MrTHYLPENTAME
2t*.4-TRtMETMYLPENTANE
2,2i5-TRIMETHYLHEXANE
N-OCTANr.
N-UONANE
CIO* ALKANC
Cl?« ALKAVE
CIO* ALKANS
OLEFJNS .
1-MF.THYLCYCLOHEXENE
TOTAL AR3HAT1CS
P-XYLCNt/M-tYLENE
. ISOPflOPYLOENZENE
CIO* AROMAYIC
TOTAL HALOSCNATfO HC
HETHYLENE CHLORIDE
TOTAL OXYGENATED HCIB)
• ••••••••^•••^••••••••M**
ISOVALEAALOEHYOt
UNIDENTIFIED V3C(C>
UNIDENTIFIED VOC
UNIDENTIFIED VOC
PARAPFIUS
OLEFINS
TOTAL AROHATICS
TOTAL HALOCENATEO HC
T3TAL OXYTCNATEO HC
UNIDENTIFIED VOC
TOTAL NHMC
120.0
15. 5
23.7
12. 5
16.1
31.3
16.&
62.0
20.1
12.5
10.1
26.1
29.3
140.0
15.1
7.9
297.7
20.1
si. a
29.3
140.0
23.0
421.1
0.144
0.016
0.032
0 . Q 1 =
0.019
0.0.17
C.020
O.J74
O.J2J
O.dl4
0.011
0.3J2
0.207
0.201
0.018
0.009
0.350
0.023
0.057 ,
0.207
0.301 IB)
0.027(C>
0.673
(A) ARTIFACT COMPOUND - CONCENTRATION NOT USED IN TOTAL M-1HC CALCULATIONS.
VARIABLE RECOVERY THROUOH DRYING SYSTEM. - CONCENTRATIONS NOT USED IN TOTAL NHHC CALCULATIONS.
(C) CONCENTRATIONS WERE. CALCULATED USINS VALUES OF a FOR THf CARBON NUMBER AND 86 FOR THE MOLECULAR WEIGHT.
UNITS ARC EQUIVALENT TO PPM ASSUMING A DENSITY OF 1.
-------
FIELD 10 «IO: 41557
SAMPLE CONTROL NO: 4204-14
SAHI'LE lYHi: LIOUID
OATt
0»Tu
SAHPLCO:
ANALYZED:
11/13/M
01/si/ns
o
i
COMPOUND
PARAFFINS
N-PEHTANE
NE1HEXANE
IS!)MEXAN£
M-HEXANE
Ch ALKAME
CO »IKANE
CIO« ALKA'IE
T3TAL HALOGENATFO HC
IA I r ML OR OF LOR QHE THANE
MCIIirLENE CHLORIDE
TOTAL OXYGENATED HC(B»
•CETONE
nm AMOHC
TOTAL HALnSENATm HC
TOTAL OVYSENATED HC
TOTAL NHHC
fONCrWTPATIOH
(NO-C/KL) CHS/U*
39."
46.5
10.0
16.0
6.0
IP.2
21.3
12.2
COMPOUND
(N5-L/HL) (MO/L)«
0.0ft
0.012
0.019
O.OOT
0.022
O.OOt
0.242IAI/
0.096 v'
1030.0
140. fl
12.2
1100.3
1.662 *
0.106 /
0.161
O.OB6
1.76Bie>
153.0
0.255
(A) ARTIFACT COMPOUND - CONCENTPAT I ON MOT USED IN TOTAL NHHC CALCULATIONS.
«fl> VARIAOLE RtCOVrOY IHMOU1H DRYING SYSTEM - CONCENTRATIONS NOT USED IN TOTAL NHHC CALCULATIONS.
to coNcr Nm AT in'is UERE CALCULATED U
-------
nrin 10 N?: 41558
SAHPLC COHIPOL 110: 4704-15
SAMPLE TYPE: LIOUIO
OATC SAHTLCD:
DATE ANALYZED:
1I/IJ/P4
cIMPOUND
PARAfFINS
C-1 VDC
i STOUTANE
H-nUIANE
fc-PE'JTAKE
NEOHEXANE
?,A-n|METHYLnuTANE
^rtHYLCYCLOHEXANE
N-NONANE
Cft ALKAHE
ct, ALKAMT
C7 ALKANE
Cfl ALKAHE
C9 ALKANf
cio* ALKAME
OLfFIMS
ACEIONIIB1LE
2-HETHYL-2-nUTEME
t-2-HEXENE
I3TAL AROHATICS
P-XYLCNE/M-XYLCNE
T3TAL HALOGCNATEn HC
TR ICHLOROFLOHOnriHAMC
MEIMYLE'IE CHLORIDE
UNIDENTIFIED MALOSENATEO HC
TOTAL OXYOFHATED ncini
2-"RlPANOL
l-OROPAHOL
SIITAMONE
CONCENTRATION
IN'i-C/HL) «M5/LI»
13..1
10.9
*.n
6T.7
R.6
13.1
S.fl
11.3
33.4
26.7
3.7
26. «
6.3
13.8
42.0
31.6
8.6
12.7
0.016
fl.013
0.006
0.081
0.010
0.016
0.007
O.OM
0.0*0
0.032
0.004
0.031
O.OU7
0.016
0.056
0.031
0.010
0.015
47.7
7.6
1.0
110.0
n.5
11.1
0.010
O.S43(A>
0.054
0.003
0.1A4
0.039
0.017
COMPOUND
UNIDENTIFIED VOCICt
UNIDENTIFIED VOC
PARAFFINS
OLCFINS
TDTAL AROHATICS
TOTAL HALOGENATCD HC
TOTAL OXYGENATED HC
UNIDENTIFIED VOC
TOTAL NHHQ
CONCENTRATION
(NG-C/HL) (HG/L)'
246.0
94.9
9.4
6.6
126.6
16.5
375.4
0.020
0.294
0.112
0.010
0.057
0.209(b>
0.020CC)
0.493
(A) ARTIFACT COMPOUND - CONCENTPAT IPN NOT USED IN TOTAL NHHC CALCULATIONS.
(fl) VARMIHr RECOVCPY Tl'ROIIfiH ORYIMS
-------
APPENDIX D
ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
D-l
-------
ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
GCA CORPORATION ANALYTICAL PROCEDURE
Sample Introduction
A 1 ul aliquot was directly injected into the GC/MS to characterize the
identities and levels of constituent components in the sample as described in
Section 7.0 of the QA Project Plan.
In the case of soil cores, a 1000 ul gaseous headspace sample was
withdrawn through the septum of the copper core. The sample was then injected
directly into the GC/MS.
Sample, Identification
All compounds were identified by GC/MS using the conditions described in
the QA Project Plan. GC/MS tuning and calibration checks were performed as
described in the QA Project Plan. Qualitative identification of priority
pollutants was performed using the retention time and spectral matches to
standards. Quantitative analysis was performed using an internal standard
method of quantitation and a three point calibration curve as described in the
QA Project Plan. These values are reported on the Data Report Sheets
entitled: Purgeables. Additional compounds were identified employing a
forward search of the NBS mass spectral library. Component concentrations for
additional compounds were calculated relative to the closest eluting internal
standard. These values, entered on Data Report Sheets entitled: Qualitative
Compounds, represent approximations due to inherent variabilities in component
response factors in the absence of reference materials.
All data reported are blank corrected using the protocols described in
the QA Project Plan. Detection limits are indicated on each Data Report Sheet.
D-2
-------
Ethylene, aniline and acetonitrile were not included on the list of
targeted compounds. Alcohols and ethyl acrylate are reported below the
detection limits shown as these compounds are detectable by direct injection
GC/MS analysis.
An estimation of the concentration levels of unidentified volatile
organic constituents was made for each sample. This value was attained by
comparison of the total ion response for the entire sample GC/MS run to the
response of one internal standard. The achieved concentration was then
corrected for blank levels, levels of surrogate and internal standards added
to the sample prior to analysis, and levels of components found in the
samples. Results of this estimation are presented in the attached data
summary tables.
In spite of the cleanup procedures applied prior to the use of PEG, some
low level contamination of acetone and methylene chloride was noted. Sample
results were not corrected for this contamination in order to allow the user
to evaluate the blank data.
RADIAN CORPORATION ANALYTICAL PROCEDURE
Radian Corporation employs a gas chromatography/multiple detection
(GC/MD) method which uses three detection systems operated simultaneously.
These are as follows: a flame ionization detector (FID) to detect and
quantitate hydrocarbons, a photoionization detector (PID) to generate
toluene-normalized response factors, and a Hall electrolytic conductivity
detector (HECD) in the halogen mode to provide quantitation and identification
of halogenated compounds. Detailed descriptions of the analytical procedures
required by this method are provided in Radian Corporation's September 28,
1984 document entitled "Protocols For Sampling And Analysis Of Surface
Impoundments And Landtreatment/Disposal Sites For VOCs."
D-3
-------
APPENDIX E
RCRA PART A PERMIT PROFILE SHEET
E-l
-------
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY. OFFICE OF SOLID HASTE
HAZARDOUS HASTE FACILITY PROFILE DATEI 06FEB85
PREPARED BY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING AND RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC. (DPRA) PAGE I 1
DATA SOURCE: HWDMS VERSION VI (AS OF 27DECB4) FACILITY! CT0072138969
FOR FACILITY! CT0072138969. ENVIRONMENTAL HASTE REMOVAL INC
FACILITY INFORMATION
EPA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER« CTD07213B969 EPA REGION: 01
FACILITY NAME: ENVIRONMENTAL HASTE REMOVAL INC FACILITY OWNERJ ENVIRONMENTAL HASTE REMOVAL INC.
MAILING ADDRESS: 130 FREIGHT STREET 130 FREIGHT STREET
MATERBURY CT 06702 MATERBURY CT 06702
203/755-2283
CONTACT PERSON/TITLE] VERONNEAU,ROLAND VICE-PRESIDEN
CONTACT TELEPHONE! 203/755-3303
FACILITY OPERATOR! ENVIRONMENTAL HASTE REMOVAL INC.
ACTUAL ADDRESSt 130 FREIGHT STREET 130 FREIGHT STREET
MATERBURY CT 06702 ????????????????????????? CT ?WT
203/755-2263
FACILITY IS A MAJOR HANDLER NOTIFIED UNDER RCRA.
FACILITY IS PRIVATE.
W TSDF OWNER IS ALSO THE OPERATOR. COUNTY! 009 NEH HAVEN EXISTENCE! 01MAY73
' EXISTING FACILITY. LATITUDE I 41-33-06.0 CLOSURE! UNKNOWN DATE
NATURE OF BUSINESS DESCRIPTION IS PRESENT. LONGITUDE! 73-02-48.0 LAST HWDMS UPDATE! 190CTB4
MAP IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. DRAWING IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. PHOTOGRAPHS ARE ACCEPTABLE. INDIAN LANDt NO
NOTIFICATION ACTIVITIES! GENERATION, TRANSPORTATION. TREATMENT/STORAGE/DISPOSAL.
TRANSPORTATION MODE(S)t HIGHHAY.
SIC CODES:
(01) 4953 REFUSE SYSTEMS
DESIGN CAPACITIES!
(01) SOI CONTAINER 137.500.00 GALLONS. (02) S03 HASTE PILE 1,000.00 CUBIC YARDS.
(03) T04 OTHER TREATMENT 186,000.00 GALLONS/DAY.
HASTES: METRIC TONS HASTE PROCESSESS
U239 XYLENE 13.61 SOI
U228 TRICHLOROETHENE » 110.77 SOI T04
U227 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHENE 108.86 SOI T04
U226 1,1,1-TRICHLOROMETHANE « 203.39 SOI T04
U223 TOLUENE DIISOCYANATE 0.91 SOI
U220 TOLUENE 13.61 SOI
U213 TETRAHYDROFURAN(I) OR 1,4-EPOX 2.27 SOI
U210 TETRACHLOROETHANE * 6.80 SOI T04
U209 1,1.2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE/ACET 6.00 SOI T04
U208 1,1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 2.27 SOI T04
U201 RESORCINOL 0.91 SOI
U196 PYRIOINE 0.91 SOI
U191 2-PICOLINE 72.30 SOI T04
U188 PHENOL OR CARBOLIC ACID.HYDROX 4.54 SOI T04
U165 NAPHTHALENE 86.46 SOI T04
NOTE! ONLY THE FIFTEEN LARGEST HASTES ARE LISTED HERE.
««• FACILITY TOTAL «•« 11,658.52
«« INFORMATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HASTE REMOVAL INC CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE. «*
-------
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCYi OFFICE OF SOLID HASTE
HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITY PROFILE DATEI 06FEB85
PREPARED BY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING AND RESEARCH ASSOCIATES. INC. (OPRAI PAGES Z
DATA SOURCE: HWDMS VERSION VI (AS OF. 27DECfi4> FACILITY! CTD072138969
HASTESt METRIC TONS WASTE PROCESSESS (CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS PAGE)
WASTES WITHOUT AMOUNTS OR PROCESSES!
0000-D003 F013 K074 POSE U229
FINANCIAL DATAi
CURRENT CLOSURE COST ESTIMATE! »0. POSTED ON 23FEBB4I PRIOR CLOSURE COST ESTIMATE! 10.
CURRENT POST-CLOSURE COST ESTIMATE! »0. POSTED ON UNKNOWN DATEl PRIOR POST-CLOSURE COST ESTI »0.
PHASE II VERIFICATION SURVEY!
WASTE PROCESS SIZES:
WASTE PILES: 4,000.00 CUBIC YARDS.
STORAGE CONTAINERS! 200.000.00 GALLONS.
STORAGE TANKS: 17fl.000.00 GALLONS.
TREATMENT TANKS! 150,000.00 GALLONS.
THIS FACILITY WAS A TSD OR GENERATOR IN 1981.
HAZARDOUS WASTE GENERATED IN 19Bli 1,250.00 TONS.
THIS SITE RECEIVED HAZARDOUS WASTES GENERATED BY OTHER FIRMS.
COMMERCIAL WASTE MANAGEMENT IS THE PRIMARY ACTIVITY AT THIS SITE.
DUNS DATA:
SICS: 4953 STARTED! 1973
ENVIRONMENTAL WASTE REMOVAL* BUSINESS LINE! WASTE REMOVAL NET WORTH! UNKNOWN
I 130 FREIGHT ST PRINCIPAL OFFICER! M VERONNEAU PR SALES: t2.eSO.000.
^ WATERBURY CT 06702 PHONE: 203/755-2283 EMPLOYEES: 47
«« NOTE: END OF REPORT FOR FACILITY! CTD072138969, ENVIRONMENTAL WASTE REMOVAL INC »»
-------
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY. OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE
HAZARDOUS HASTE FACILITY PROFILE
PREPARED BY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING AND RESEARCH ASSOCIATES. INC. IDPRA)
DATA SOURCE! HUGHS VERSION VX IAS OF 27DECB4)
FOR FACILITY: CTDQ02496909. SUMMIT CORPORATION OF AMERICA
DATEI 06FEB85
PAGE: 1
FACILITY: CTD002496909
FACILITY INFORMATION
EPA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER! CTD002496909
FACILITY NAME I SUMMIT CORPORATION OF AMERICA
MAILING ADDRESS! 1430 HATERBURY ROAD
THOMASTOH CT
EPA REGION!
FACILITY OWNERI
06787
CONTACT PERSON/TITLE!
CONTACT TELEPHONE!
ACTUAL ADDRESS!
CAMPBELL JAMES CHEH ENGR
203/203-4391
1430 HATERBURY ROAD
TIIOMASTON
01
SUMMIT CORPORATION OF AMERICA
1430 MATERBURY ROAD
THOHASTON CT 06767
203/283-4391
FACILITY OPERATOR!
CT 067B7
W
FACILITY IS A MAJOR HANDLER NOTIFIED UNDER RCRA.
FACILITY IS PRIVATE.
TSDF OWNER IS ALSO THE OPERATOR.
EXISTING FACILITY.
NATURE OF BUSINESS DESCRIPTION ZS PRESENT.
MAP IS ACCEPTABLE. DRAWING IS ACCEPTABLE. PHOTOGRAPHS ARE
NOTIFICATION ACTIVITIES: GENERATION, TREATMENT/STORAGE/DISPOSAL.
SUMMIT CORPORATION OF AMERICA
1430 MATERBURY ROAD
iimmmmmmttm CT rim
203/283-4391
COUNTY! 005 LITCHFIELD
LATITUDE ! 41-40-30.0
LONGITUDE! 73-04-24.0
ACCEPTABLE. INDIAN LAND!
EXISTENCE! 010CT54
CLOSURE! UNKNOWN DATE
LAST HMDMS UPDATE: 190CTA4
NO
SIC CODES:
(01) 3471 PLATING AND POLISHING
DESIGN CAPACITIES:
(01) SOI CONTAINER
(03) S04 SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT
1.500.00 GALLONS.
1.120,865.00 GALLONS.
(02) 308 TANK STORAGE
(04) T01 TANK TREATMENT
6,850.00 GALLONS.
1.197.000.00 GALLONS/DAY.
HASTES:
U226 1.1.1-TRICHLOROMETHANE *
U122 FORMALDEHYDE
U002 ACETONE (I)
P121 ZINC CYANIDE
PI06 SODIUM CYANIDE
P104 SILVER CYANIDE
P098 POTASSIUM CYANIDE
P030 CYANIDES
P029 COPPER CYANIDE
F009 SPENT STRIP 1 CLEAN BATH SOLU
FOOa SLUDGES FM BOTTOM OF BATH FM E
F007 SPENT BATH SOLU FM ELECTROPLAT
F006 ELECTROPLATING TREAT SLUDGE
F001 SPENT HALO CHLORIDES i SLUDGE
D011 SILVER
NOTE: ONLY THE FIFTEEN LARGEST
«» FACILITY TOTAL «••
HASTES WITHOUT AMOUNTS OR PROCESSES:
DOOO P099
METRIC TONS HASTE PROCESSESS
0.02 SOI
0.02 301
0.00 SOI
0.00 S04 T01
0.04 S04 T01
0.00 S04 T01
0.07 S04 T01
0.20 S04 T01
0.08 S04 T01
13.72 SOI 304 T01
0.03 SOI S04 T01
25.04 SOI S04 T01
635.04 S04 T04
1.09 SOI
2.59 SOI S04 T01
HASTES ARE LISTED HERE.
1,122.34
INFORMATION FOR SUMMIT CORPORATION OF AMERICA CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE. *«
-------
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, OFFICE OF SOLID HASTE
HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITY PROFILE DATES 06FEBB5
PREPARED BY DEVELOPMENT PLANKING AND RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC. (DPRA) PAGE: Z
DATA SOURCE: HWDMS VERSION VI IAS OF 27DEC04) FACILITY! CTD002496909
WASTES WITHOUT AMOUNTS OR PROCESSES: (CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS PAGE)
PHASE II VERIFICATION SURVEYt
WASTE PROCESS SIZES:
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS: 50.00 SQUARE YARDS.
WASTE PILES: 50.00 CUBIC YARDS.
STORAGE CONTAINERS: 300.00 GALLONS.
TREATMENT TANKS: 54,500.00 GALLONS.
THIS FACILITY WAS A TSO OR GENERATOR IN 1981.
HAZARDOUS WASTE GENERATED IN 1961: UNKNOWN TONS.
THIS SITE DID NOT RECEIVE HAZARDOUS WASTES GENERATED BY OTHER FIRMS.
«« NOTE: END OF REPORT FOR FACILITY: CTD002496909, SUMMIT CORPORATION OF AMERICA «»
W
I
In
-------
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY. OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE
HAZARDOUS HASTE FACILITY PROFILE
PREPARED BY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING AND RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC. (DPRA)
DATA SOURCES HWDMS VERSION VI IAS OF 270EC84)
FOR FACILITY! CTD001145267, SUPERIOR ELECTRIC CO THE
DATEi 06FEB65
PAGE: 1
FACILITY! CTD001145267
FACILITY INFORMATION
EPA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER! CTD001145267
FACILITY NAME: SUPERIOR ELECTRIC CO THE
MAILING ADDRESS: 383 MIDDLE STREET
BRISTOL
W
CT>
CONTACT PERSON/TITLE!
CONTACT TELEPHONE!
ACTUAL ADDRESS:
DEMARIA MILLIAH PLANT ENGINEER
203/502-9561
383 MIDDLE ST
BRISTOL
EPA REGION!
FACILITY OWNERl
01
THE SUPERIOR ELECTRIC COMPANY
383 MIDDLE STREET
CT 06010 BRISTOL CT 06010
203/582-9561
FACILITY OPERATOR! THE SUPERIOR ELECTRIC COMPANY
383 MIDDLE STREET
CT 06010 ?nm???m?m??????m CT nm
203/582-9561
FACILITY IS A MAJOR HANDLER NOTIFIED UNDER RCRA.
FACILITY IS PRIVATE.
TSDF OWNER IS ALSO THE OPERATOR.
EXISTING FACILITY.
NATURE OF BUSINESS DESCRIPTION IS PRESENT.
MAP IS ACCEPTABLE. DRAWING IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. PHOTOGRAPHS ARE NOT PRESENT.
COUNTY! 003 HARTFORD
LATITUDE i 41-40-20.0
LONGITUDE! 72-54-28.0
EXISTENCE! 16APR62
CLOSURE: UNKNOWN DATE
LAST HWDMS UPDATE: 190CT84
INDIAN LANDS NO
NOTIFICATION ACTIVITIES: TREATMENT/STORAGE/DISPOSAL.
SIC CODES:
(01) 3612 TRANSFORMERS
(02) 3621 MOTORS AND GENERATORS
(03) 3622 INDUSTRIAL CONTROLS
DESIGN CAPACITIES!
(01) S02 TANK STORAGE
(03) T01 TANK TREATMENT
HASTES:
FOlft HASTEHATR TREATMNT SLUDGE FH X
F017 PAINT RESIDUES GENERATED FROM
F006 ELECTROPLATING TREAT SLUDGE
DOOO NON-LISTED TOXIC HASTES
«» FACILITY TOTAL «»
HASTES HITHOUT AMOUNTS OR PROCESSES:
F002
PHASE II VERIFICATION SURVEY:
WASTE PROCESS SIZES:
HAZARDOUS HASTE GENERATED IN 1981:
DUNS DATA:
SICS: 3612 3621 3622
SUPERIOR ELECTRIC CO THE*
383 MIDDLE STREET
BRISTOL CT 06010
3.100.00 GALLONS.
132,000.00 GALLONS/DAY.
(02) 304 SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT
(04) T04 OTHER TREATMENT
120.000.00 GALLONS.
400.00 GALLONS/DAY.
METRIC TONS HASTE PROCESSESS
5.90 S04 T01
0.14 S04 T01
5.90 S04 T01
195.50 S02 T04
207.43
UNKNOWN TONS.
BUSINESS LINE: HFR ELECTRICAL
PRINCIPAL OFFICER: WAYNE A PETERSON PR
PHONE: 203/582-9561
STARTED! 1946
NET WORTH: UNKNOWN
SALES: 144.300,000.
EMPLOYEES: 800
NOTE: END OF REPORT FOR FACILITY! CTD001145267. SUPERIOR ELECTRIC CO THE «»
-------
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE
HAZARDOUS HASTE FACILITY PROFILE
PREPARED BY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING AND RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC. COPRA)
DATA SOURCE I HWDH5 VERSION VI IAS OF 270EC84)
FOR FACILITY! CTD0014S0154, WHYCO CHROMIUM COMPANY INC
DATEt 06FEB85
PAGEt 1
FACILITY! CTD001450154
FACILITY INFORMATION
EPA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER! CT0001450154
FACILITY NAME: WHYCO CHROMIUM COMPANY INC
MAILING ADDRESSi PO BOX 160
THOMASTON CT 06787
EPA REGION!
FACILITY OWNER:
01
JACOB HYNER
PO BOX 160
THOMASTON
203/283-5826
CT 06787
CONTACT PERSON/TITLE!
CONTACT TELEPHONE!
ACTUAL ADDRESS:
GRADOMSKI STEPHEN TECH DIR
203/283-5826
HATERBURY ROAD
THOMASTON
FACILITY. OPERATOR!
JACOB HYNER
PO BOX 160
CT 06787
203/283*5826
w
FACILITY IS A MAJOR HANDLER NOTIFIED UNDER RCRA.
FACILITY IS PRIVATE.
TSOF OWNER IS ALSO THE OPERATOR.
EXISTING FACILITY.
NATURE OF BUSINESS DESCRIPTION IS PRESENT.
MAP IS ACCEPTABLE. DRAWING IS ACCEPTABLE.
COUNTY! 005
LATITUDE :
LONGITUDE:
PHOTOGRAPHS ARE ACCEPTABLE.
LITCHFIELD
41-37-34.0
73-04-44.0
INDIAN LAND:
EXISTENCE:
CLOSURE:
LAST HWDM3 UPDATE:
CT T???T
22MAY72
UNKNOWN DATE
190CT84
NO
NOTIFICATION ACTIVITIES! GENERATION, TREATMENT/STORAGE/DISPOSAL.
SIC CODES:
(01) 3471 PLATING AND POLISHING
DESIGN CAPACITIES:
(01) S04 SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT
(03) T02 SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT
WASTES:
F006 ELECTROPLATING TREAT SLUDGE
*» FACILITY TOTAL «»•
WASTES WITHOUT AMOUNTS OR PROCESSES!
F007-F009 P053 P098 P106 U154 U159 U202
161,000.00 GALLONS.
80,000.00 GALLONS/DAY.
(02) T01 TANK TREATMENT
80,000.00 GALLONS/DAY.
METRIC TONS WASTE PROCESSESS
317.52 304 T02
317.52
600.00 TONS.
2,000.00 SQUARE YARDS.
1,500.00 GALLONS.
9,000.00 GALLONS.
20,000.00 GALLONS.
PHASE II VERIFICATION SURVEY:
WASTE PROCESS SIZES:
LANDFILL:
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS:
STORAGE CONTAINERS:
STORAGE TANKS:
TREATMENT TANKS:
THIS FACILITY WAS A TSD OR GENERATOR IN 1981.
HAZARDOUS WASTE GENERATED IN 1981: 600.00 TONS.
THIS SITE DID NOT RECEIVE HAZARDOUS HASTES GENERATED BY OTHER FIRMS.
DUNS DATA:
«•«• INFORMATION FOR WHYCO CHROMIUM COMPANY INC CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE. «*
-------
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE
HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITY PROFILE DATES 06FEB05
PREPARED BY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING AND RESEARCH ASSOCIATES. INC. (DPRA) PAGE: 2
DATA SOURCE: HWDMS VERSION VI IAS OF 27DECB4) FACILITY! CTD0014S0154
DUNS DATA: (CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS PAGE)
SICS: 3471 STARTED: 1947
WHYCO CHROMIUM COMPANY INC BUSINESS LINE: MANUFACTURES NET WORTH: UNKNOWN
650 WATERBURY ROAD PRINCIPAL OFFICER: J HYNER PR SALES: 15,000,000.
THOHASTON CT 06787 PHONE: 203/283-5626 EMPLOYEES: 120
MM NOTE: END OF REPORT FOR FACILITY: CTD001450154, WHYCO CHROMIUM COMPANY INC «»
W
I
00
------- |