Unit.9a States
Environmental Drot3ction
Agency
Office oi Air Qualitv
Planning and Standards
Research Triangle Park NC 27711
EMB Report 85-HWS-3
October 1985
Air
Hazardous Waste TSDF
Waste Process Sampling
Volume III:
American Airlines, Inc., Tulsa, OK
Chemical Resources, Inc., Tulsa, OK
Great Lakes Container, Tulsa, OK
Hydrocarbon Recyclers, Tulsa, OK
International Paper Company, Joplin, MO
Kerr McGee Chemical Company, Springfield, MO
McDonnel! Douglas Corporation, Tulsa, OK
Sun Petroleum Company, Tulsa, OK
Tri Container, Inc., Catoosa, OK
-------
Prepared for
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711
HAZARDOUS WASTE TSDF
WASTE PROCESS SAMPLING
VOLUME III.
American Airlines, Inc., Tulsa, OK
Chemical Resources, Inc., Tulsa, OK
Great Lakes Container, Tulsa, OK
Hydrocarbon Recyclers, Tulsa, OK
International Paper Company, Joplin, MO
Kerr McGee Chemical Company, Springfield, MO
McDonnell Douglas Corporation, Tulsa, OK
Sun Petroleum Company, Tulsa, OK
TRI Container, Inc., Catoosa, OK
October 1985
Prepared by
GCA CORPORATION
GCA/TECHNOLOGY DIVISION
Bedford, Massachusetts 01730
-------
DISCLAIMER
This Final Report was furnished to the Environmental Protection Agency by
GCA Corporation in fulfillment of Contract Nos. 68-01-6871, Task No. 37 and
68-02-3851, Task No. 8. The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed are
those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Environmental Protection
Agency. Mention of company or product name is not to be considered as an
endorsement by the Environmental Protection Agency.
ii
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
gage
Introduction iv
American Airlines, Inc. Trip Report 1-1
Chemical Resources, Inc. Trip Report 2-1
Great Lakes Container Trip Report 3-1
Hydrocarbon Recyclers, Inc. Trip Report 4-1
International Paper Company Trip Report 5-1
Kerr McGee Chemical Company Trip Report 6-1
McDonnell Douglas Corporation Trip Report 7-1
Sun Petroleum Company Trip Report 8-1
TRI Container, Inc. Trip Report 9-1
Appendix A - Sample Identification Forms A-l
Appendix B - GCA Data Report Forms B-l
Appendix C - Radian Corporation Data Report Forms C-l
Appendix D - Analytical Procedures D-l
Appendix E - RCRA Part A Permit Profile Sheet E-l
-------
INTRODUCTION
Air emissions from hazardous waste treatment, storage and disposal
facilities (TSDFs) are currently being studied by the EPA Office of Air
Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS). The nine sites described herein
represent a portion of the testing program undertaken by OAQPS in an effort to
profile TSDFs and estimate emissions. The results of the testing will be used
as background information for possible standards for TSDF area source air
emissions.
Process sampling of wastestreams at eight of the sites was conducted. The
other site had processes not amenable to sampling. In addition, detailed
information on all waste operations, emission controls and operating practices
was collected. The facilities were selected to increase the scope of TSDF
operations encompassed by previous case study and testing programs. An effort
was made to expand the data base in terms of treatment operations, waste types
and geography.
The wastestream characterization, sample analysis and waste process
descriptions should supply the necessary inputs to emission estimation
techniques. Liquid samples from waste treatment tanks and impoundments were
obtained from each site. Soil samples from land treatment operations were
taken where applicable. The results of these analyses are presented for each
site.
These nine sites, located in Oklahoma and Missouri, represent both waste
generators with on site treatment operations and commercial TSDFs. Waste
treatment operations from aircraft maintenance, oil refining, and wood
treatment processes were included. Also visited were solvent recycling, drum
reconditioning, and waste disposal operations. Sample analysis and process
descriptions reflect operations on the day of the visit. Included with each
trip report is a summary of the analytical sample results, the actual analysis
results and the Part A Permit Profile sheet for the facility.
iv
-------
Section 1.
American Airlines, Incorporated
Tulsa, OK
1-1
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section Page
I. Introduction 1-5
II. Wastestream Characterization 1-5
III. Facility Process Descriptions 1-7
Drum Storage 1-7
Wastewater Treatment 1-7
IV. Sampling Information 1-8
Sample Location Description 1-8
Quality Assurance 1-10
V. Sample Analysis 1-10
Analytical Summary 1-10
Quality Assurance 1-13
1-2
-------
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
1 Wastes Handled Annually At American Airlines, Tulsa
Oklahoma 1-6
2 Liquid Sample Analysis From The Aerator/Separator Tank
At American Airlines In Tulsa, Oklahoma 1-11
3 Liquid Sample Analysis From The Holding Tank At The American
Airlines Facility In Tulsa, Oklahoma 1-12
4 Cross Reference List Of Submitted Samples Collected At
American Airlines In Tulsa, Oklahoma 1-14
5 Quality Control Data For Analysis Conducted On the Samples
Collected At American Airlines In Tulsa, Oklahoma 1-15
1-3
-------
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure Page
1 Flow diagram for American Airlines treatment system,
Tulsa, Oklahoma 1-9
1-4
-------
Site: American Airlines, Incorporated
3800 N. Mingo Road
Tulsa, Oklahoma 74151
lat 36° 12' 2.5" N
long 95° 52' 2.5" W
FCID: OKD001824564
Site Contact: Hugh Frost
(918) 832-3385
Field Trip Personnel: K.C. Hustvedt, EPA
Susan Thorneloe, EPA
Tim Curtin, GCA/Engineering
Doug Seeley, CCA/Measurements
Eric Hirst, GCA/Measurements
Visit time and date: 9:00 a.m. November 29, 1984
I. INTRODUCTION
American Airlines, Incorporated, is located adjacent to the airport in an
industrialized area of Tulsa, Oklahoma. The facility's main purpose is to
provide routine maintenance (i.e., level C) to commercial aircraft. This
includes the stripping, degreasing, repainting, general cleaning and repairing
of aircraft and their engines.
II. WASTESTREAM CHARACTERIZATION
The bulk waste materials handled at American Airlines, Inc., include
silicone rubber stripper (CB 105), plating wax, abrasive glass beads, process
vat wastes (i.e., filter residues), and degreaser/spent solvent sludges. The
total volume of bulk material handled is estimated at about 4400 gallons every
three months, or approximately 80 drums per quarter. Table 1 summarizes the
latest Part A waste data for the facility. The Part A Permit Profile is
provided in Appendix E.
The wastewater is derived primarily from the rinse water tanks used during
the plating process. Additionally, large amounts of alkaline cleaning
solutions are regularly discharged into the aqueous wastestream. As a result,
the normal pH range of the wastewater is between 8.0 and 8.5.
1-5
-------
TABLE 1. WASTES HANDLED ANNUALLY AT AMERICAN AIRLINES, TULSA, OKLAHOMA.
EPA Waste Code Description Amount (MT)
F017 Paint Residues 36.29
F009 Spent Strip/Clean Solution 9.07
F008 Electroplating Bath Sludge 13.61
F007 Spent Electroplating Bath 9.07
F002 Halogenated Still Bottoms 10.89
F001 Spent Halogenated Solvents 68.04
D007 Chromium 812,921.05
D006 Cadmium 38.10
D002 Corrosives 632,351.97
D001 Ignitables 42.64
DOOO Non-listed Toxics 9.07
1-6
-------
The small amount of organic solvents (e.g., 1,1,1-trichloroethane or
perchloroethylene) which may be present in the wastewater probably is a result
of small amounts of degreasers/strippers adhering to parts and then being
rinsed into the aqueous wastestream. An additional mechanism of solvent entry
into the wastewater rests with the design of the industrial wastewater
collection system, in that every floor drain, sink, and sump is commingled to
collect the aqueous wastes for the wastewater treatment unit. This means that
any spill or use of solvents away from degreasing tanks would result in an
increase of these compounds in the industrial wastewater. Mr. Hugh Frost of
American Airlines, Inc., felt that the effect of these solvents on possible
atmospheric emissions would be low since the quantity present in the aqueous
waste should be relatively small and that most of the degreasers used are
heavier than water and sit at the bottom of the holding tanks.
III. FACILITY PROCESS DESCRIPTIONS
Drum^Storage
The drum storage area consists of an open-air, concrete pad which is
curbed and sloped to an automatic sump. In the event of rain, leakage or a
spill, the sump will automatically pump the contained material to the
wastewater holding tank. The number of drums will vary, but does not usually
exceed 75 to 80. When enough drums are present to constitute a truckload
(i.e., about 80 drums), they are shipped off site. This occurs approximately
once every three months, i.e., this area is covered under the 90 day rule.
Wastewater Treatment
Mr. Hugh Frost of American Airlines, Inc., indicated that the wastewater
treatment system begins with a gravity fed commingled collection system. This
system feeds the aqueous wastestream through primary filters (i.e., gratings)
into a lift station which is used to pump the influent to a circular clarifier
(i.e., separation tank). The clarifier consists of three rings; an agitated
1-7
-------
central core, a clarification/separation area equipped with skimmer, and an
aqueous material overflow area. This overflow is then gravity fed to one of
two holding tanks. The dimensions of these tanks are as follows:
Clarifier/Separator: Circular tank; open
(Approx.) 15 ft. diameter
(Approx.) 10 ft. depth
Holding Tank 2: Circular tank; open
195,000 gal. capacity
10 ft. depth
Holding Tank 3: Circular tank; open
283,000 gal. capacity
10 ft. depth
From these .tanks the wastewater is deepwell injected at the normal rate of
225,000 gallons per day (rate is variable during a day, up to 450 gpm can be
injected). The existing well is approximately 3060 feet deep into a limestone
formation. American Airlines, Inc., does maintain four monitoring wells for
sampling down to the aquifer (approx. 200 feet). A new injection well is
currently being constructed, since the old well which was built in 1960 has
been accumulating debris. In previous years, before American Airlines took
over operations, wastes were not filtered before injection. The entire
wastewater treatment area is encircled by an earthen berm.
IV. SAMPLING INFORMATION
Sample Location, Description
Samples were collected from two locations at American Airlines (Figure 1):
o water tank #3, and
o water tank #1.
Wastewater here is exposed to the air in three tanks: two holding tanks
and a third separator holding tank. The material in the two holding tanks
1-8
-------
SAMPLING LOCATION
injection
pumps
lift
pumps
s
J
^
from plant
CLARIFIER/SEPARATOR
(TANK //I)
Figure 1. Flow diagram for American Airlines treatment system, Tulsa, Oklahoma.
-------
appeared Co be identical, so only one of these was sampled. Tank 3 was chosen
because it was somewhat sheltered from the wind and therefore the sample
(WT3-1) was easier to collect. Sample temperature was 17°C.
The liquids in the separator holding tank flowed through three rings;
first an agitated central core, then a calmer main vessel which trapped an oil
layer several inches thick and finally a narrow ring around the perimeter
under which the aqueous fraction drained. The oil-covered main vessel was
sampled (WT1-1) since this represented the majority of surface area. It
should be noted that some volatile organics may have been confined in the
aqueous subsurface layer by the upper oil layer. Sample temperature was 21°C.
Following the methods described in the QA manual, ten samples were
collected (i.e., five per tank). Acquiring samples without small air bubbles
was difficult because of the viscous properties of the oil in the samples.
Quality Assurance
Sampling procedures were employed as described in the Quality Assurance
Project Plan dated 30 October 1984. Liquid samples were collected in
quintuplicate, as a standard procedure, with one of the five samples retained
by the facility as a split. The remaining quadruplicate liquid samples were
returned to. the GCA Analytical Laboratory in Bedford, MA where they were
received into the sample bank.
Sample custody and handling procedures included the use of sample tags,
chain-of-custody sheets, refrigeration of samples between sampling and
analysis, and shipping of samples in coolers sealed with custody seals. In
addition, each sample was assigned a unique sample code which links it to the
facility, the source, and the sample point.
V. SAMPLE ANALYSIS
Analytical Summary
Tables 2 and 3 provide the analytical summary report for the process
samples collected during the site visit (see Appendix A). These tables
1-10
-------
TABLE 2. LIQUID SAMPLE ANALYSIS FRDH THE AERATOR/SEPARATOR
TANK AT AHERICAN AIRLINES IS TULSA, OKLAHMA
Major Ccspounds Concentration iaq/1!
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 200
Acetone 290
ftethylene chloride 160
TOTAL HAL06ENATED HC 360~
TOTAL UNIDENTIFIED HC 10700
TOTAL NOH-KETKAHE HC I1100
a
Analysis of saaple 41BSO by SCA Corporation/Technology Division using SC/S1S.
b
ag/l = pps assusinq a density ot 1.
1-11
-------
TABLE 3. LIQUID SAMPLE ANALYSIS FROH THE HOLDINS TANK AT
THE AMERICAN AIRLINES FACILITY IN MSA, OKLAHQHA
Compounds Detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Tetrachloroethylene
d
Total Xylenes
Toluene
Ethyl benzene
Trichloroethylene
Acetone
Hethylene chloride
:ss33ssssssassssas?STr~s '7"=sa
Concentration
b
Analysis 1
200000
70000
33000
11000
9400
e
1100
e
1000
NO
a
(ug/l)
c
Analysis 2
270000
100000
120000
18000
28000
NO
11000
6900
a
ug/l = ppb assuring a density of 1.
b
Analysis of suple 418S3 by 6CA Corporation using 6C/HS.
Analysis of saiple 41883 dup. by GCA Corporation using BC/HS.
d
Total Xylenes * ortbo-, ieta-, para-
e
Present but beneath detection liiits.
1-12
-------
present the major compounds quantified by GCA Corporation/Technology
Division. The actual data report sheets for each respective sample are
provided in Appendix B.
Analytical procedures are outlined in Appendix D. Aqueous samples were
screened by GCA using GC/FID, and analyzed using GC/MS. American Airlines
samples were analyzed only by GCA/Technology and only this section of
Appendix D is applicable to samples taken at American Airlines.
Quality Assurance
Chain of Custody
A set of samples was received by GCA/Technology Division on
November 30, 1984 for volatile organic analysis (VOA). Routine inspection
upon receipt revealed the samples to be clearly labeled and appropriately
chilled with the exception of Sample AA-WT3-1D, which arrived empty;
apparently it leaked in transit. Air bubbles were observed in some samples;
these are noted in Table 4 under remarks. Upon receipt the submitted samples
were entered in the Master Log Book and assigned GCA Control Numbers as listed
in Table 4. Chain of custody procedures were adhered to and the samples were
transferred to the locked Sample Bank for refrigerated storage until the time
of analysis. Sample custody records were maintained throughout all laboratory
procedures. Duplicate samples were submitted to Radian Corporation of Austin,
Texas under chain of custody for volatile organic analysis (VOA).
Quality Control
Quality control protocol for the volatile organics analysis included the
use of surrogate spikes. Each sample was spiked with a surrogate mixture
containing dg-toluene, bromofluorobenzene and d4-l,2-dichloroethane.
Surrogate recoveries are listed in Table 5.
1-13
-------
TABLE 4. CROSS REFERENCED LIST OF SUBMITTED SAMPLES
COLLECTED AT AMERICAN AIRLINES IN TULSA, OKLAHOMA.
Sample GCA
Identification Control Remarks
AA-WTI-1A 41877* SAB
AA-WTI-1B 41878*
AA-WTI-1C 41879
AA-WTI-1D 41880
AA-WT3-1A 41881* SAB
AA-WT3-1B 41882 SAB
AA-WT3-1C 41883 SAB
AA-WT3-1D 41884 Arrived empty;
leaked in transit
SAB = Small air bubble
^Submitted to Radian Corporation, Austin Texas.
1-14
-------
TABLE 5. QUALITY CONTROL DATA FOR ANALYSES CONDUCTED ON THE
SAMPLES COLLECTED AT AMERICAN AIRLINES IN TULSA, OKLAHOMA:
SURROGATE RECOVERIES - VOLATILE ORGANICS
Sample
Identification
GCA
Control No.
D8-
Toluene
Brgmofluorobenzene
D4-1.2-
Dichlproethane
AA-WTI-1D 41880 92 132 101
AA-WT3-1C 41883
Method Bank 01/09/85 88 144 91
1-15
-------
Section 2.
Chemical Resources, Incorporated
Tulsa, OK
2-1
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section Page
I. Introduction 2-3
II. Waste Characterization 2-3
III. Facility Process Description 2-4
2-2
-------
Site:
FCID:
Site Contact:
Field Trip Personnel:
Visit Time and Date:
Chemical Resources, Inc.
2904 4th National Bank Building
Tulsa, Oklahoma 74119
OKD000402396
Rick Senimore, (918)/582-6994
Tim Curtin, GCA/Engineering
Chuck Vaught, GCA/Engineering
Jim Thomas, GCA/Measurements
Jim Edmonds, Chemical Resources
John Thomas, Chemical Resources
November 28, 1984
9:00 AM
I. INTRODUCTION
Chemical Resources, Inc., is a company owned by the W.J. Lamberton
Company, established to serve the hazardous waste management industry.
The facility, operated in Tulsa, Oklahoma, is exclusively dedicated to
deep well injection of hazardous wastes. The company operates in a rural
setting and owns about 600 acres around their facility. The central
operating facility only encompasses a few acres. The site sits atop a
large arbuckle limestone formation that stretches out several hundred
miles. The formation surfaces in Eastern Oklahoma and gradually becomes
deeper to the west. At present Chemical Resources operates one deep well
injection facility but may drill another one 600 to 1200 feet from the
original one. The present well is 3400 feet deep with a bottom hole
temperature of 105°F. This well has operated since 1972 and could
operate indefinitely.
II. WASTE CHARACTERIZATION
The Chemical Resources facility has three storage tanks for accepting
wastes to be injected. One black, 400 barrel capacity, fiberglass tank
and one black, 200 barrel capacity, fiberglass tank are used to accept
2-3
-------
acidic wastes such as sulfuric and chromic acid. A white, 400 barrel
capacity, carbon steel tank is used for other wastes such as wash waters
from pesticide and herbicide operations and electroplating wastes. All
cyanide wastes and wastes with strong odors (phosphoric acids) are
disposed through the injection well directly from the truck. Such wastes
as these are not allowed in the storage tanks. The facility accepts no
PCBs, radioactive material, or oily wastes. The wastes accepted are
typically 90 to 92% water with 5 to 107. solids.
III. FACILITY PROCESS DESCRIPTIONS
Operations at Chemical Resources run 24 hours per day. The disposal
rate remains relatively constant throughout the year at about 2 million
gallons per month pumped into the well. Anywhere from 300 to 400
thousand gallons of this waste comes in by railcar. The remainder is
delivered by truck. Any time a shipment of waste is received, a sample
is collected and tests are run for PCBs, sulfides, cyanides and other
chemical groups. The necessary paperwork is also checked for each load
to assure compliance with state and federal laws governing the materials'
transport.
Each month random spot checks are made of two trucks delivering
waste. From these two trucks samples are taken and an extensive chemical
analysis is done. This may be done more than twice when truck loads of
waste are received from new or one-time customers. Once the waste is
cleared for disposal, it is pumped into one of the storage tanks. It
takes about 20 minutes to unload a 5,000 gallon truck into the tank and
about an hour to directly unload it into the well. Whether the well is
fed from a truck or from one of the storage tanks, about one or two
barrels per minute can be pumped into the well. A screen is placed in
line to catch solids. The solids are placed in drums and sent to Alabama
for disposal.
2-4
-------
The facility has one lined pit that was used to hold drilling muds
and collect any waste spilled or leaked from storage tanks. Chemical
Resources has submitted a closure plan to remove the impoundment. At the
time of our visit, the pit was completely empty. Directly opposite the
storage tanks on the other side of the pit were three angled probes.
These probes were used to sample the soil underneath the pit liner to
check for leaks.
The groundwater level is 19 to 21 feet below the surface and an
aquifer from the old Arkansas River bed runs under the property. As a
result, Chemical Resources maintains eight monitoring wells. One well is
at a depth of 100 feet and the other seven are at 20 feet. Each of these
wells is sampled quarterly.
2-5
-------
Section 3.
Great Lakes Container
Tulsa, OK
3-1
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section
I. Introduction
II. Waste Characterization.
III. Facility Process Description 3-6
Drum Reconditioning Process 3-6
Wastewater Flow 3-6
IV. Sampling Information 3-10
Sample Location Description 3-10
Quality Assurance 3-18
V. Sample Analysis 3-12
Analytical Summary 3-12
Quality Assurance 3-12
3-2
-------
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure gage
1 Schematic of Flushing Operation, Great Lakes, Container,
Tulsa, Oklahoma 3-7
2 Open tanks and impoundments at Great Lakes Container, Tulsa,
Oklahoma 3-8
3-3
-------
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
1 Specifications For Open Tanks and Impoundments At Great
Lakes Container, Tulsa, Oklahoma 3-9
2 Liquid Sample Analysis From The Rain Runoff Moat At Great
Lakes Container In Tulsa, Oklahoma 3-13
3 Liquid Sample Analysis From The Rain Runoff Moat/Oily
Surface Area At Great Lakes Container In Tulsa,
Oklahoma 3-14
4 Liquid Sample Analysis From The Indoor Caustic Wash Fit
At Great Lakes Container In Tulsa, Oklahoma 3-15
5 Liquid Sample Analysis From The Oil Pit At Great Lakes
Container, Tulsa, Oklahoma 3-16
6 Cross Reference List of Submitted Samples Collected At
Great Lakes Container, Tulsa, Oklahoma 3-17
7 Quality Control Data For Analysis Conducted On The Samples
Collected At Great Lakes Container In Tulsa, Oklahoma 3-18
3-4
-------
Site: Great Lakes Container
3717 West 21st Street
(Route 9)
Tulsa, Oklahoma 74107
Site Contact: Robert Weiss
918/587-1574
Field Trip Personnel: Robert Weiss, Great Lakes Container
K.C. Hustvedt, EPA
Susan Thorneloe, EPA
William Battye, GCA/Engineering
Douglas Seely, CCA/Measurements
Eric Hirst, GCA/Measurements
Visit time and date: November 28, 1984
3:30 p.m.
I. INTRODUCTION
The Great Lakes Container plant cleans and reconditions used drums by
washing with water and caustic soda. The plant is located in an urban
industrial area in western Tulsa. It handles about 3000 drums per week,
running 8 hours per day, 5 days per week. The facility has been in use for
about 15 years, and Great Lakes Container has operated it for about 9 years.
Generally, 15,000 to 20,000 drums are on site, about 80 percent of which have
been cleaned, and all of which are closed. Most drums are washed within
one week, although drums which are difficult to clean may remain on the site
indefinitely. Most drums handled are steel drums; about 500 of the drums on
site at the time of the visit were fiberglass.
The drums generally are hauled to and from the site by Great Lakes
Container trucks. Some of the drums handled are bought by Great Lakes
Container, and others are serviced for other clients. Great Lakes does not
accept drums with residue in the bottom. All of the drums handled should have
been rinsed before arriving there.
II. WASTE CHARACTERIZATION
This facility handles mostly oil drums and some solvent drums which were
used for toluol, toluene, xylene, and hydrocarbon solvents. Some chlorinated
3-5
-------
solvent drums are accepted. Paint drums formerly were also handled and may
again be handled in the future, but the paint drum reconditioning operation is
now closed down. Herbicide drums, resin drums, and roofing tar drums are
refused.
III. FACILITY PROCESS DESCRIPTIONS
Drum Reconditioning, Process
Drums arriving on site are dumped outside. The bungs are removed and the
drums are treated at an outdoor preflushing operation using a dilute caustic
(less than 1 percent) solution at about 180°F. The drums are then transferred
inside for final flushing with 6 to 7.5 percent caustic solution at about
150°F.
A schematic of the flushing operation in shown in Figure 1. In both the
preflush and final flushing operation, drums are conveyed bung-hole down over
a 1000 gallon open steel tank. High-pressure water is sprayed from the
reservoir into the bung-hole and falls back into the reservoir for recycle.
Cleaned drums are pressurized to check for leaks. Leaking drums are
trucked to a landfill. Dented and collapsed drums are reshaped by pressuring
them in a roller. Drums from which rust is not removed in the caustic
flushing operations are sent to a chain cleaner, where chains are placed in
the drum and the drum is agitated. These drums are then returned to the
flushing operation.
Great Lakes formerly used a paint stripper/water solution to clean used
paint drums. This operation was shut down because of difficulties associated
with the use of paint stripper. The operators are considering servicing paint
drums in the existing caustic flushing operations.
Wastevater Flow
A schematic of the Great Lakes Container facility showing open tanks and
impoundments is given in Figure 2. Specifications for open tanks and
impoundments at the facility are given in Table 1. The preflush tank is an
above ground basin located outside the plant building. The top of the tank is
3-6
-------
r
•-a
DRUM
NOTE ' NOT TO SCALE
OIL LAYER
WATER
HIGH
PRESSURE
WATER JET
Figure 1. Schematic of flushing operation, Great Lakes Container, Tulsa, Oklahoma.
-------
oo
i
5'
20'
IW I
| FINAL FLUSH TANK
I INLET
J5'
0PM
WASTEWATER
STORAGE
TANK
1
5'
PREFLUSM TANK
PW
-20'-
® SAMPLING POINTS
NOTE' NOT TO SCALE
DRUM
STORAGE
RUNOFF MOAT
NO OIL SLICK
M-l
260
-20-
Figure 2. Open tanks and impoundments at Great Lakes Container, Tulsa, Oklahoma.
-------
TABLE 1. SPECIFICATIONS FOR OPEN TANKS AND IMPOUBDMENTS AT GREAT LAKES
CONTAINER, TULSA, OK.
Parameter (units)
Length (feet)
Width (feet)
Depth (inches)
Volume (gallons)
Temperature °F
Preflush
tank
20
3
14
1000
220
Final
flushing
tank
20
3
NA
1000
140
Holding
tank
35
6
8
10,000
72
Runoff
moat
525
10
NA
NA
72
3-9
-------
about 5 feet above ground level and the liquid level is about 4 inches below
the tank rim. The final flush tank is located indoors, beneath a metal grate
in the building floor. The liquid level in this tank was about 4 inches below
the floor. Water in the preflush and final flushing tanks is reused for
two weeks and is then dumped into an outdoor 10,000 gallon storage pit. This
pit is an uncovered tank dug into the ground just outside the plant building.
The liquid level in the pit is about 6 feet below ground level. From the
storage pit, the water is periodically pumped to the nearby Sun Refinery for
treatment in the refinery wastewater treatment system.
Rainwater runoff from facility property is collected in a large moat on
the downhill side of the facility. At the time of the visit, water in the
moat was shallow enough that some of the moat bottom was exposed. The water
level was about 10 feet below ground level. This water is also periodically
pumped to the Sun Refinery for treatment.
IV. SAMPLING INFORMATION
Sample. Lpcation^pescription
Four open tanks and impoundments were sampled at the Great Lakes Container
facility:
o the preflush tank (PW-1),
o the final flush tank (IW-1),
o the wastewater holding pit (OP-1), and
o the runoff collection moat (Ml, M2).
Sampling points are illustrated in the schematic in Figure 2. Specifications
for the sampled tanks and impoundment were given in Table 1.
The preflush tank contained milky white water covered with a thick (1 to
2 inch) layer of viscous oil. The temperature measured in the tank at the
time of sampling was 220°F, although plant personnel had stated that the tank
normally is operated at about 180°F. The tank was sampled at one point near
the end where barrels are removed (Figure 2, point PW-1).
3-10
-------
The final flushing tank was located beneath a grate in the building
floor. This tank also was covered with a thick layer of viscous oil. The
tank was sampled near the end where barrels enter the final flushing operation
(Figure 2, point IW-1).
The wastewater holding tank is about 6 feet below ground level. It
contained milky water covered with a thick viscous oil layer. The pit was
sampled at the far end from the wastewater inflow (Figure 2, point OP-1).
The runoff collection moat contained milky white water partially (about
50 percent) covered with a thin brown oil layer. Samples were collected from
the water phase (Figure 2, point M-l) and from the oil layer (Figure 2, point
M-2).
Quality^Agsurance
Sampling procedures were employed as described in the Quality Assurance
Project Plan dated 30 October 1984. Liquid samples were collected in
quintuplicate, as a standard procedure, with one of the five samples retained
by the facility as a split. The remaining quadruplicate liquid samples were
returned to the GCA Analytical Laboratory in Bedford, MA where they were
received into the sample bank.
Sample custody and handling procedures included the use of sample tags,
chain-of-custody sheets, refrigeration of samples between sampling and
analysis, and shipping of samples in coolers sealed with custody seals. In«
addition, each sample was assigned a unique sample code which linked it to the
facility, the source, and the sample point.
Because of the viscosity of the oil layers, it was difficult to obtain air
free samples from the preflush tank (PW-1), the final flush tank (IW-1), the
wastewater holding tank (OP-1), and the oil layer in the rainwater runoff moat
(M-2).
3-11
-------
V. SAMPLE ANALYSIS
Analytlea1 Summary
Tables 2 through 5 provide the analytical summary reports for all of the
process samples collected during the site visit (see Appendix A). These
tables present the major compounds quantified by either GC/MS (GCA
Corporation/Technology Division) or a multiple detection system (Radian
Corporation). The actual data report sheets for each respective sample are
provided in Appendix 5 and Appendix C.
Appendix D contains information on the analytical procedures employed by
GCA and Radian. Aqueous samples were screened by GCA using GC/FID as
indicated.
Quality Assurance
Chain of Custody
A set of samples was received by GCA/Technology Division on
November 30, 1984 for volatile organic analysis (VOA). Routine inspection
upon receipt revealed the samples to be clearly labeled and appropriately
chilled. Air bubbles were observed in some samples; these are noted in
Table 6 under remarks. Upon receipt the submitted samples were entered in the
Master Log Book and assigned GCA Control Numbers as listed in Table 6. Chain
of custody procedures were adhered to and the samples were transferred to the
locked Sample Bank for refrigerated storage until the time of analysis.
Sample custody records were maintained throughout all laboratory procedures.
Duplicate samples were submitted to Radian Corporation of Austin, Texas under
chain of custody for volatile organic analysis (VOA).
Quality Control
Quality control procedures for volatile organics determination included
the use of surrogate spikes. Each sample was spiked with a surrogate mixture
containing d4.-l,2-dichloroe thane, dg-toluene, and bromofluorobenzene.
Surrogate recoveries are presented in Table 7.
3-12
-------
TABLE 2. LIGUiO SAKPLE ANALYSIS FROM THE RAIN RUNOFF «OAT
AT BREAT LAKES CONTAINER IN TULSA, DKLAHQilA
Concentration (ag/l)
Major Cospour.di
Analysis I
Analysis 2a It 2b
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1,2,4-Triaethylbenzene
1,3,5-TriBethylbenzene
3-Kethylheptane
Acetone
Benzene
Ethylbenzene
Indan
Isobutyibenzene
Hethylene chloride
N-Heptane
N-Nor.ane
N-Undecane
Nechexane
Styrene
Toluene
t-Diethylbenzsna
•-Ethyltoluene
p-Diethylbenzene
p-lylene/a-Xyiene
TOTAL PARAFFINS
TOTAL AROMATIC HC
TOTAL HALOBcNATED HC
TOTAL OXYGENATED HC
TOTAL UNIDENTIFIED HC
TOTAL NDN-ME7HANE HC
0.6
0.04
0.2
0.04
O.OB
0.2
0.6
0.02
0.9
0.01
0.01
0.1
0.03
0.04
0.1
0.03
0.1
0.02
T~
0.2
0.01
0.01
0.04
0.01
0.01
0.04
0.1
0.01
0.1
0.01
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.01
0.1
~T
0.4
0.02
1.6
1.6
Analysis of saaple 41393 by ECA Corporation/Technology Division using SC/HS.
Analysis of sasplss 41590 & 41891 by Radian Corporation using 5C/HD.
ag/1 = ppa assuming a density of 1.
3-13
-------
TAELE 3. LISL'ID SAHPLE ANALYSIS FRON THE RAIH fil'SOFF KOAT/QILY
SURFACE AREA AT BREAT LAKES CONTAINER IN TLISA, OKLAHOMA
Major Coapounds Concentration (tg/1)
Hethylene chloride 10
TOTAL HAL06ENATEO HC IT
TOTAL UNIDENTIFIED HC 3700
TOTAL NGN-HETHANE HC 3700
a
Analysis of sasple 41397 by BCA Corporation /Technology Division using BC/flS.
b
•g/1 = ppt assiuing a density of 1.
3-14
-------
TABLE 4. LIQUID SAMPLE ANALYSIS FROM THE INDDCR CAUSTIC HASH
PIT AT GREAT LAKES CONTAINER IN TULSA, OKLAHOMA
a,b
Major Coapounds Concentration (ag/1)
Hethylene chloride 90
TOTAL KAL06ENATED HC 90
TOTAL UNIDENTIFIED HC 2500
TOTAL NON-METHANE HC 2600
a
Analysis of saaple 41399 by SCA Corporation/Technology Division using EC/,1S.
b
sq/1 ' ppa assuming a density of 1.
3-15
-------
TABLE 5. LIQUID SAMPLE ANALYSIS FSQB THE OIL PIT AT
GREAT LAKES CONTAINER IN TULSA, OKLAHOMA
a,b
Major Coapcunds Concentration (ig/I)
1,1,1-Tricnloroethane
Methyl ene chloride
Toluene
TOTAL AROMATIC HC
TOTAL HAL06ENATED HC
TOTAL UNIDENTIFIED HC
TOTAL NON-SETHANE HC
50
35
35
35
85
3400
3500
a
Analysis of saaple 41905 by SCA Corporation/Technology Division using SC/MS.
b
•g/I = pps assuring a density of 1.
3-16
-------
TABLE 6. CROSS REFERENCE LIST OF SUBMITTED SAMPLES
COLLECTED AT GREAT LAKES CONTAINER, TULSA, OKLAHOMA.
Sample
Identification
GL-M-1A
GL-M-1B
GL-M-1C
GL-M-1D
GL-M-2A
GL-M-2B
GL-M-2C
GL-M-2D
GL-1W-1A
GL-1W-1B
GL-1W-1C
GL-1W-1D
GLOP-1A
GLOP-AB
GLOP-1C
GLOP-1D
GLPW-1A
GLPW-1B
GLPW-1C
GLPW-1D
GCA
Control
41890*
41891*
41892
41893
41894*
41895*
41896
41897
41898
41899
41900*
41901*
41902*
41903*
41904
41905
41906*
41907*
41908
41909
Remarks
LAB
LAB
LAB
LAB
SAB
SAB
SAB
SAB
LAB
LAB
LAB
LAB
SAB = Small air bubble
LAB = Large air buble
*Submitted to Radian Corporation, Austin, Texas.
3-17
-------
TABLE 7. QUALITY CONTROL DATA FOR ANALYSIS CONDUCTED ON THE SAMPLES
COLLECTED AT GREAT LAKES CONTAINER IN TULSA, OKLAHOMA:
SURROGATE RECOVERIES - VOLATILE ORGANICS
Sample
Identification
GCA
Control No.
D8-
Toluene
Bromofluorobenzene
D4-l,2-
Dichloroethane
GL-M-1D
GM-M-2D
GM-1W-1B
GLOP-1D
GLPW-1D
Method Blank
Method Blank
41893
41897
41899
41905
41909
01/11/85
01/15/85
Laboratory Control Sample
Average Percent Recovery
Relative Standard Deviation (%)
84
80
85
96
82
83
83
79
84
5.2
87
107
105
82
80
90
80
77
89
12
102
85
92
113
96
59
124
106
97
20
3-18
-------
Section A.
Hydrocarbon Recyclers, Incorporated
Tulsa, OK
4-1
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section Page
«••.•-.•-. «i».a»i
I. Introduction 4-5
II. Was test ream Characterization 4-7
III. Waste Treatment Process 4-11
Facility Process Description 4-11
Storage and Handling of Containers 4-12
Storage and Handling of Waste In Tanks 4-13
IV. General Inspection Plan 4-15
Tank Inspection 4-15
Underground Tanks 4-16
Drum Storage Pads 4-16
Processing Units 4-16
Weekly Inspection 4-17
Remedial Action 4-17
4-2
-------
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure Page
1 Site Diagram From Hydrocarbon Recyclers, Tulsa, Oklahoma.... 4-6
2 Process Area And Tanks, Hydrocarbon Recyclers, Tulsa,
Oklahoma 4-9
4-3
-------
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
1 Hazardous Waste Description From Hydrocarbon Recyclers,
Tulsa, Oklahoma 4-8
4-4
-------
Site:
FCID:
Site Contacts:
Field Trip Personnel:
Visit Time and Date:
Hydrocarbon Recyclers, Inc.
5354 West 46th Street, South
Tulsa, Oklahoma 74107
OKD000632737
Phillip H. Cover, General Manager
James H. Gibson, Technical Representative
(918) 446-7434
Bill Battye, GCA/Engineering
Chuck Vaught, GCA/Engineering
Randy McDonald, EPA
November 27, 1984
1:00 PM
I. INTRODUCTION
Hydrocarbon Recyclers, Inc., is in the business of recycling for reuse a
wide variety of industrial waste products. These include material classified
as controlled industrial waste and material -which is not designated as
controlled industrial waste. The material can be categorized into roughly
three groups: waste oil and fuel, chlorinated solvents and nonchlorinated
solvents.
Hydrocarbon Recyclers1 plant is located at 5354 West 46th Street South in
Tulsa County, but outside the present city limits of Tulsa. The plant is
located on a five-acre site, the boundaries of which can be seen in the
topographic map which is Figure 1. The plant process area is located on 1.5
acres in the center of the site. The process area and the land surrounding it
slope very gently from the southeast to the northwest. The nearest bodies of
water are a series of farm ponds located along a gully to the west of the
plant. This gully drains into the Arkansas River approximately 2-1/2 miles
north of the plant site. The plant is located outside the 100-year flood
plain. The elevation of the 100-year flood is approximately 700 feet; the
lowest elevation on Hydrocarbon Recyclers1 property is 730 feet.
4-5
-------
"I,
X X - X H H—•«- H X-—X- X K K H N M-
H M- ;M N—•-* M-
-DRUM PAD
LOAD/UNLOAD.
PROCESS AREA
,LOAD STATION
•DRUM PAD
SURFACE
DIKE
]
>
SEWAGE
LAGOON
*
/-DIKE
WATER EVAPORATION POND
> X K X M K H N K M M K X M X K M K-M M u'. M
^
M U U
X
-X H-
o
.7
ir.
UJ
Cl
O
j3 .
M rt
rt d
o o
o j:
M m
T3 H
B "
O ,
U
-------
The soil on which the plant is located is a tight clay with alternating
layers of shale and clay in the subsoil. The tight clay soil probably
explains the lack of any groundwater in the area. There are no water wells in
Section 29 in which the plant is located. The nearest residence to the site
is 1/4 mile south of the plant. The surrounding land is used for agriculture,
except for the land immediately east of the plant which is the site of U.S.
Pollution Control's truck terminal.
Waste products are transported into the plant by truck. Truck traffic at
the plant varies from one to five bulk transports per day, three to five
bobtail trucks per day and one to three van loads of drums per week.
II. WASTESTREAM CHARACTERIZATION
A listing of the hazardous wastes handled at Hydrocarbon Recyclers is
provided in Table 1. The processing of these wastes depends upon their
categorization as a waste oil/fuel, chlorinated solvent or nonchlorinated
solvent.
The waste oils processed consist of a wide variety of automotive and
industrial lubricants. This includes engine oil, transmission fluid, gear
oil, hydraulic fluid, compressor oil, diesel engine oil, cutting fluids,
refrigeration oils and synthetic oils. HRI does not accept for processing any
type of transformer oil or electrical insulation oil unless the customer
provides an analysis by a certified laboratory indicating the oil does not
contain PCBs. The waste oils are processed by one of two methods. The
majority is pumped from the waste oil storage tanks, V-4 and V-5, into the
waste oil dehydrator where it is heated to 230° F and stripped with nitrogen
and steam to remove water and any fuel dilution present. Waste oils are also
processed in Tanks V-13, V-14 and V-17. These tanks are insulated and are
equipped with heat exchangers to heat the oil to the required temperature.
Oils processed in these tanks are heated to a specified temperature, usually
160° F, a small amount of demulsifier is added and the oils are allowed to set
until the water separates from the oil. The water is drained to the plant
waste dump and the finished oil from both processes is sold as a heavy fuel
oil. The location of the tanks and processing units as discussed in
subsequent paragraphs can be seen in Figure 2, which is a map of the plant
processing area.
4-7
-------
TABLE 1. HAZARDOUS WASTE DESCRIPTION FROM HYDROCARBON
RECYCLERS, TULSA, OKLAHOMA.
EPA
Hazardous
Waste No.
K054
D002
D001
F001
F002
F003
F005
D001
Waste Oil
Waste Fuel
Description
Corrosives
Ignitables
Spent Halo. Solvents
Spent Halo. Solvents
Spent Non-halo. Solvents
Spent Non-halo. Solvents
Ignitables
Annual
puantity
900 Ibs
400 Ibs
100 Ibs
150 tons
150 tons
180 tons
340 tons
210 tons
4,000 tons
2,000 tons
Process
Codes3
«*MMI«i^
T03 DSD
T03 D80
T03 D80
S02
S02
S02
S02
S02
S02
S02
a Process codes from Part A data base: T03 = incinerator,
D80 = landfill, S02 = storage tank.
4-8
-------
LZHJ ^ ! x 4COEEL
!2'0x2QH x 4CO-ESL
IG'gx 15 HxSSCO GAL
IO'2xl6'Hx88COGAL
IO'0xl6'Hx8SGOGAL
TAG I SIZE
TANK SCHEDULE
V39
V38
V37
V36
V35
V34
V33
V32
V3I
V30
V29
V2S
V27
V26
V25
V24
V23
V22
V2I
.FUTURE-
FUTURE-
8"0x!9-€Vix
S'0xl9
|20x2GHx
80X20HX
2000 GAL
3000 GAL
6000 GAL
6000 GAL
6000 GAL
6000 GAL
400 BEL
7500 GAL
10.000 GAL
10,000 GAL
400 BEL
6000. GAL"
GCOOGAL
6000 GAL
6000 GAL
7V/x25Lx5THx 65OO GAL
7'V/x25Lx5'Hx 6500 GAL
!0'0xl7>ix
!20x20'Hx
8'0 x |6'Hx
8'0x!6'Hx
TAG I SIZE
TANK SCHEDULE
FTEM V28.V39- FUTURE
INSTALLAT'CN
Figure 2. Process area and tanks, Hydrocarbon
Recyclers, Tulsa, Oklahoma.
V9-UWCEHGnCUNC-3TILL
BOTTOM . •
ITEM-VIO-CCNCnETESuMP ;
ITEM.V20:-UNOERGEa;NO LGHT
ENDS '
'CC^JCHETE•PACS SKCV/N"A7
CROSS HATC-i
HYDROCARBON RECrCLEHS
30111
1/BV
av:
T1TU:PROCESS AREA 'FIST PL
Difc'
CR&WNIMG NO:
4-9
-------
Waste fuels processed include gasoline, jet fuel, kerosene and diesel.
These waste streams are collected in V-16 and V-27 tanks. During processing
the mixed fuels are sent first to the coalescer where any water is removed.
The waste is then fed into the atmospheric unit where it is heated to 550° F
and a naphtha fraction is distilled overhead. The naphtha is stored in an
underground storage tank, V-20. The bottoms from the atmospheric distillation
unit are fed to the vacuum distillation unit where, at a vacuum of 10 mm Hg,
the diesel fuel is distilled overhead, condensed, and stored in V-18 tank.
The bottoms from the vacuum distillation unit are blended with the finished
waste oil in V-28 tank.
The nonchlorinated solvents processed at Hydrocarbon Recyclers include
isopropyl alcohol, toluene, ethanol, methyl ethyl ketone, acetone, Stoddard
Solvent and mineral spirits. These solvents are collected in batches,
normally 3,000 to 10,000 gallons at a time, for processing. They are stored
in one or more of the following tanks: V-3, V-23, V-24, V-32 or V-33. Tanks
are steam cleaned before the introduction of different products if cross
contamination is a problem. All of these waste streams are distilled in the
atmospheric unit. They do not go through the coalescer, but are filtered
before entering the reboiler. The solvent is distilled and the overhead
product is stored in V-19, V-25, V-34 or V-35 tank. The still bottoms are
pumped into V-9 tank where they are tested before being blended into kiln fuel
or taken to Chemical Resources' injection well for disposal.
The chlorinated solvents processed at Hydrocarbon Recyclers arrive in
drums. These drums are unloaded on the east drum storage pad and are tested
before they are pumped into the appropriate storage tank. The storage tanks
for waste chlorinated solvents are V-l, V-2, V-6, V-7, V-36 and V-37. The
chlorinated solvents are processed in a separate smaller atmospheric
distillation unit which is used only for chlorinated solvents. This is to
prevent contamination of nonchlorinated products such as isopropyl alcohol and
toluene with chlorinated compounds.
4-10
-------
The chlorinated solvents are processed in smaller batches, 1,000 to 3,000
gallons at one time. The waste material is filtered before it is pumped into
the distillation unit, distilled and the overhead product collected in an
accumulator, and most of the water separated out. The solvent is then pumped
to a calcium chloride dryer which lowers the water content to approximately
100 ppm. The chlorinated solvent is then pumped to a finished product storage
tank, V-ll, V-12 or V-35. The solvent is tested and, if necessary,
reinhibited before it is sold for reuse. The still bottoms are drained in
55-gallon drums and sent to the solvent recovery unit at Lone Mountain for
further processing.
Another product sold by Hydrocarbon Recyclers is kiln fuel. This product
is a product prepared primarily from mixed paint solvents for burning in
cement kilns. The fuel must be high in Btu's, low in chlorides, low in ash,
and contain no mercury, lead or PCBs. The material is received in drums or
bulk, tested and pumped into V-31 tank where it is blended into a uniform
product before it is sold.
III. WASTE TREATMENT PROCESSES
Facility Process Descriptions
Processing equipment at the plant includes three distillation units, three
insulated tanks for chemically treating oils and two waste oil dehydrators for
distilling water from waste oil. The largest distillation unit is the
atmospheric unit which is used for nonchlorinated solvents. The column is 24
inches in diameter and 36 feet high; it consists of two sections. The lower
section contains eight valve trays, the top 6 feet of the column is packed
with stainless steel mesh. Together the two sections have approximately 12
theoretical plates of distillation capacity. The reboiler will hold 500
gallons of liquid and is heated with hot oil from the plant's hot oil system.
The atmospheric still can process 200 to 500 gallons per hour depending on the
amount of solvent contained in the charge.
4-11
-------
A small atmospheric distillation unit called the chlorinated solvent unit
or "C" unit is also operated at the plant. This unit is only used for
chlorinated solvents. The tower is 12 inches in diameter. It also has two
sections, a lower with trays and the upper with stainless steel packing. The
height is 15 feet. The reboiler is also smaller, holding about 100 gallons of
charge. The product yield on the still varies between 25 and 100 gallons per
hour depending on the type of solvent and the amount in the feed.
The third distillation unit is the vacuum distillation unit. The tower on
this unit is 30 inches in diameter and 20 feet high. The unit is operated at
a vacuum of 10 mm Hg. The vacuum is provided by a Kinney Vacuum pump. This
unit is used to redistill diesel fuel.
Storage and Handling of Containers
Containers of waste products are stored on concrete pads located in one of
three areas at the facility. These are the east drum pad, the south drum pad
and the drum storage area for Hydrocarbon Recyclers* still bottoms which is
located inside the plant process area.
The east drum storage is located adjacent to the east truck unloading
pad. The pad is 14 feet wide and 38 feet long and will hold 108 drums. The
pad is curbed with 3 inch concrete curb on three sides and connects to the
truck pad on the west. This allows all liquid to drain onto the truck pad and
into the plant waste dump. This pad is used to unload incoming chlorinated
solvents and oils. These products are sorted as they are unloaded from the
trucks, tested and pumped into the appropriate storage tanks.
The south drum storage pad is located next to the truck pad and any liquid
on this pad drains onto the truck pad and into the plant waste dump. A 3 inch
curb surrounds the pad on all sides except adjacent to the truck pad. The pad
is 29 feet by 34 feet and will hold 208 55-gallon drums. This pad is used to
store drums of liquid intended for the kiln fuel program, and drums of solid
waste separated from incoming waste drums or cleaned from storage tanks prior
to it being shipped off site.
4-12
-------
The third drum pad is located on the west side of the plant process area.
This pad measures 17 feet by 64 feet, has at least a 3 inch curb on all four
sides, and is covered by a roof to prevent rainwater from accumulating on the
storage pad. The pad will hold 240 55-gallon drums. It is used primarily to
store still bottoms from the chlorinated solvent unit until they can be
transported to USPCI's Lone Mountain solvent recycling facility for further
processing. It is also used to store oils and solvents that are used at the
plant.
Empty drums are stored on a rack south of the evaporation pond. Those
containing oils or nonhazardous solvents are sent to a drum reconditioner for
reconditioning. Any hazardous waste drums are triple rinsed with Stoddard
Solvent if they are to be reconditioned. The rinse solvent is pumped into
kiln fuel. Empty drums which cannot be reconditioned are sent to USPCI's Lone
Mountain storage where they are crushed and buried.
The drums on the pads are inspected daily for leaking or being
overpressured. If a drum is leaking, it is transferred to an overpack drum or
the contents are poured into a reconditioned drum. If a drum appears to be
overpressured the drum is vented and the material transferred to a 16-gauge
reconditioned DOT drum. Reconditioned drums are also used for the still
bottoms from the chlorinated solvent unit. If reconditioned drums are not
available, care is taken to insure that the still bottoms are placed in a drum
that contains the solventi A good supply of reconditioned drums are kept in
the trailers on the south edge of the plant.
The containers are loaded, unloaded and transferred from one location to
another in the bucket of a bobcat. If chlorinated solvents are being handled,
care must be taken to handle only one drum at a time. The tops of open-topped
drums and the bung in closed-head drums are kept securely fastened except when
the drums are opened for testing or pumping.
Storage and Handling of Waste in Tanks
The handling and storing of hazardous wastes require that specific
instructions be given for each transfer. The instructions are given only
after the material has been tested and confirmed that the handling and
4-13
-------
transferring will not cause a hazard due to incompatibility with other
materials or due to incompatibility with the storage tank. Because of the
potential compatibility problems and equally important economic reasons, every
precaution should be taken to prevent cross contamination of waste materials.
At this facility the tanks used for storage of hazardous wastes have been
designed and constructed to insure that they are suitable for storage of the
materials as listed on the accompanying drawings. The engineering
specifications for each hazardous waste tank as well as the current service of
each tank is listed on the drawing. The engineering specifications include
design specifications, construction materials, lining materials (if any), tank
dimensions, capacity, shell thickness. Although the plot plan shows the
location of all the tanks, only the drawings for the tanks designated for
hazardous wastes are attached.
Upon completion of sample testing and evaluation, the incoming waste
material is transferred into the appropriate tank. The decision to transfer
the material is made after thorough review of sample testing results manifests
and waste material profile reports. To avoid potential for cross
contamination of waste materials, tanks have been designated for each of the
major waste streams received at the facility. Whenever the service of a tank
is changed, the tank is emptied completely and cleaned to prevent
incompatibility problems with the future product.
All transfer into and out of the tanks is by chemical hose. This
procedure prevents accidental mixing of the contents either by leaking valves
or. by accidentally opening the wrong valve. In all transfers, the hoses and
the pump are drained completely before beginning the transfer.
Whenever a transfer is made into a tank (or any container such as trucks,
process units, etc.), a manual gauge of the contents of the receiving tank is
made to insure that overfilling will not occur. In normal cases a gauge of
the delivering container and of the receiving container is made before and
after the transfer. The delivery volume and the receiving volume is then
compared to insure that the transfer is complete. Because hoses are used for
these transfers, leaks are detected immediately and the transfer stopped until
4-14
-------
repairs are made. The hose connections are checked before each transfer and
new gaskets are installed as needed. For transfers that will exceed a
calculated vapor space of less than 18 inches in the receiving tank , the
operator will visually monitor the transfer to prevent overfilling of the
receiving tank.
A water layer is maintained in each of the chlorinated solvent tanks to
help reduce the vapors. The more volatile solvents such as
trichlorotrifluoroethane and methylene chloride are stored in a pressure
vessel (V-32 or V-33). The other solvents are stored in cone roof tanks with
each of the tanks interconnected to a vapor recovery system set to relieve to
the atmosphere at a maximum pressure of two pounds. The pressure tanks are
set to relieve at 15 pounds either to the vapor recovery system or to the
atmosphere. Because the water layer minimizes the amount of vapors present in
the tanks the safety relief valves have yet to open to the atmosphere.
To minimize corrosion of the tanks used for storage of chlorinated
solvents, the pH of the water layer is checked after each transfer and soda
ash is added to maintain the pH between 6.5 and 7.5.
IV. GENERAL INSPECTION PLAN
The purpose of this plan is to eliminate wherever possible, by means of a
regular inspection, the contamination of soil and water on the plant site.
The various parts of the inspection plan are outlined below:
Tank Inspection
All tanks and the accompanying valves and hose or piping are inspected
daily. Any leaks are repaired and any spilled materials are cleaned up. The
inspection includes a visual check for leaks, corrosion or spills.
Whenever a tank is opened for cleaning a thorough inspection is made to
check for internal corrosion. The inspection is by visual means by a
knowledgeable employee and a more thorough inspection using a means of
4-15
-------
determining the actual metal thickness when any corrosion is suspected. The
frequency of this inspection is determined by the types of materials stored in
the tank, but occurs at least once a year for all tanks. A record of all
inspections is kept on file for review at any time.
Underground Tanks
The leak detection system on underground tanks is checked daily and waste
material seen in the leak detector is sampled and removed to a proper storage
or disposal area.
Drum Storage Fads
The drums on the drum storage pad are checked daily for leaks, bulging and
corrosion. If the condition of the drum is not suitable, then the contents of
the drum are transferred to a reconditioned drum and a new label placed on the
drum indicating its contents and source. The non-suitable drum is then
prepared for disposal at an approved disposal site.
Processing Units
The processing units, which include the atmospheric and vacuum
distillation units, chlorinated solvent still, dehydrator, coalescer, aerial
cooler and hot oil system are checked daily for leaks, corrosion, or spills.
All non-compliance conditions will be reported immediately and remedial action
taken as soon as conditions allow.
In some cases, the supervisor (or his designee) may determine that it is
appropriate to contain any spillage until the operating process unit can be
shut down in a safe and orderly manner. After the unit has been shut down,
then the cleanup can commence under the supervisor's direction.
4-16
-------
Weekly Inspection
The fence, dikes around the process area, evaporation pond and sewage
lagoon are inspected weekly on a routine basis, or any time there is a heavy
rain to check for erosion damage.
Remedial Action
All leaks and spills are cleaned up immediately. Minor leaks and spills
are cleaned up using drip pans, buckets, rags or other absorbent materials and
disposed of accordingly with the type of material that has been spilled.
Larger spills may require the use of pumps to remove the liquid portion. In
all cases contaminated dirt is removed and placed in metal drums. Each drum
is then properly labeled and prepared for shipment to an approved disposal
site.
The supervisor is notified of all remedial action that has been taken and
is cases of major consequences he will assume responsibility of the cleanup
and direct all subsequent actions.
4-17
-------
Section 5.
International Paper Company
Joplin, MO
5-1
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section Page
I. Introduction 5-5
II. Waste Characterization Data 5-5
III. Facility Process Description 5-6
Wastewater Treatment 5-6
Surface Impoundments 5-8
IV. Sample Information 5-8
Sampling Location Description 5-8
Quality Assurance 5-8
V. Sample Analysis 5-19
Analytical Summary 5-19
Quality Assurance 5-19
5-2
-------
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
1 Process Unit Description, International Paper, Joplin,
Missouri 5.7
2 Description of Surface Impoundment, International Paper
Joplin, Missouri.. 5-9
3 Liquid Sample Analysis From The Hazardous Waste Pond #5
At International Paper In Joplin, Missouri 5-12
4 Liquid Sample Analysis Of An Oil Slick From Hazardous Waste
Pond No. 5 At The International Paper Facility In
Joplin, Missouri 5-13
5 Liquid Sample Analysis From The Penta Receiving Pond #4/
Near Influent At International Paper Company In
Joplin, Missouri 5-14
6 Liquid Sample Analysis From Penta Receiving Pond 4 At The
International Paper Facility In Joplin, Missouri 5-15
7 Liquid Sample Analysis From The Wastewater Holding Pond At
International Paper Company In Joplin, Missouri 5-16
8 Cross Reference List of Submitted Samples Collected At
International Paper, Joplin, Missouri 5-17
9 Quality Control Data For Analysis Conducted On The Samples
Collected At International Paper, Joplin, Missouri 5-21
5-3
-------
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure Page
1 Waste Treatment Areas At International Paper, Joplin,
Missouri 5-11
5-4
-------
Site:
FCID:
Site Contacts:
Field Trip Personnel:
Visit Time and Date:
International Paper Company
P.O. Box 2605
Joplin, Missouri 64803
lat 37° 03' 41" N
long 94° 28' 34" W
MOD007129935
Richard Russell, Manager of Manufacturing,
Treated Wood Products Division
(214)934-6211
Wayne Ryland, Plant Manager
(417)624-2270
Bill Battye, GCA/Engineering
Chuck Vaught, GCA/Engineering
Jim Thomas, GCA/Measurements
Calvin Bates, International Paper
November 29, 1984
1:00 PM
I. INTRODUCTION
The International Paper Company operates a wood preserving plant in
Joplin, Missouri. This RCRA covered facility treats approximately 200,000 ft3
of wood per month for use as telephone poles using pentachlorophenol (PCP).
When the plant began its operation in 1937, creosote was the preservative
used. In 1955 the company incorporated PCP along with creosote into its
process. From 1979 until the present the facility has used PCP exclusively as
its preservative.
II. WASTE CHARACTERIZATION DATA
Hazardous waste generated and treated at the facility consists of the
sludge from the wastewater treatment process. The sludge is temporarily
stored in a 250,000 gallon tank. This sludge is landfilled on site. The EPA
waste code and amount generated annually as listed in the Part A (Appendix E)
is:
K001 Bottom Sludge from the Treatment
of Wastewaters from Wood Preserving
1.36 MT
5-5
-------
III. FACILITY PROCESS DESCRIPTION
Wastewater^ Treatment
The wastewater generated in the process comes from the steam condensate
used to heat the poles before and after the PGP treatment. Up to
15,000 gallons a day of wastewater is collected from this process. In the
past the wastewater was sent to one of nine surface impoundments, but recently
the company has installed a wastewater treatment system. The ponds are no
longer being used and are expected to be closed by the end of 1986.
The wastewater treatment system begins as the process water enters two
storage tanks. In these tanks the oil and water separate, and the water is
taken off the bottom and fed to a concrete holding pit. The oil layer on top
is then returned to the process. This oil layer typically contains about
9-1/2 percent PCP and the remainder is diesel fuel. These tanks have a closed
top and are vented to the atmosphere. They are 16 feet in diameter and
20 feet high with a 30,000 gallon capacity. They usually remain filled within
two feet of the top.
From the holding pit the water is fed to a static mixer where a cationic
polymer is added. Next, the water enters the flocculater unit where the
anionic polymer is added and a dissolved air floatation (DAF) unit suspends
the solids. The sludge is removed, placed temporarily in a sludge tank, and
then landfilled in a concrete bunker. The facility plans to dewater the
sludges through a filter press prior to disposal.
From the DAF unit the water passes through a sand filter to catch solids.
After passing the filter the stream is split and each part is fed through a
series of two carbon filters. Once through the carbon filters, the streams
are joined and fed to a neutralization basin where caustic soda is added to
increase the pH. After neutralization the water is fed to the city sewer
system. The system is capable of treating 50 gallons per minute of
wastewater. See Table 1 for process unit dimensions.
5-6
-------
TABLE 1. PROCESS UNIT DESCRIPTION, INTERNATIONAL PAPER, JOPLIN, MISSOURI.
Process Unit
Wastewater Storage Tanks
(Decanters)
Wastewater Holding Pit
DAF
Carbon Filters
Description
o Two identical units present
o Closed top & vented to
atmosphere
o 16 ft diameter; 20 ft high
o 30,000 gallon capacity
o color - silver
o full within 2 ft of top
o water taken off bottom, oil off
top
o length - width = 20 ft;
o depth - 14 ft
o usually contains about 3 ft of
water
o 50 percent of surface is covered
with oil
o open unit, inside wastewater
treatment building
o length * 26 ft; width = 45
inches; depth = 6 ft
o open at top
o diameter - 5 ft; height = 20 ft
o feed stream at top and about
2 ft above carbon
Neutralization Tank
o open tank
o length = width
o depth = 4 ft
5 ft;
5-7
-------
Surface Impoundments
The facility has nine surface impoundments on site. None at the present
time are considered active. These are scheduled for closure by the end of
1986. This will include the drainage of each pond and the removal of creosote
and PCP laden soils. At this time water is being pumped from the impoundments
to the wastewater treatment system in preparation for closure. Table 2
provides the available information for each of the nine impoundments.
IV. SAMPLING INFORMATION
Sampling Location Description
The selected sample sites (Figure 1) at the facility were these:
o pond #4,
o pond #5, and
o the holding pit.
Two samples were obtained from pond #4. One was grabbed at the inlet pipe
in the northwest corner (PRP-1). Another was taken in the southeast quarter
of the impoundment (PRP-2). The patches of tar that covered about 50 percent
of the impoundment were too viscous to sample; consequently, only water
samples were obtained here.
Two more samples were taken from pond #5. The north end was covered with
an oil layer and one sample was obtained there (HWP-1), while the other was
taken more toward the center where no oil layer was present (HWP-2).
A final sample was obtained from the holding pit (WWRP-1). The pit itself
had too much freeboard to collect a sample, so a sample was collected at a
bleed valve just in front of the static mixer.
Quality Assurance
Sampling procedures were employed as described in the Quality Assurance
Project Plan dated 30 October 1984. Liquid samples were collected in
5-8
-------
TABLE 2. DESCRIPTION OF SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS, INTERNATIONAL PAPER,
JOPLIN, MISSOURI.
Description
o contains process cooling water from
heat exchangers
o 18 ft deep
2. o old creosote pond - contains creosote
from treating cylinders; not used for
about six years
o contains spray evaporation system
that was never used because relative
humidity was too high
o 18 ft deep
3. o contaminated process water
o not used for about six years
o 25 ft deep
4. o PCP recovery pond
o process water fed directly into pond
and PCP was skimmed and recovered
o site was active until November of 1984
o small flow coming into the pond from
inlet pipe due to leaky valve
o 17 to 18 ft deep
o length = 120 ft; width = 78 ft
o 50 percent of surface was covered by
patches of tar
o surrounding berms are about 2 ft high
• 5-9
-------
Table 2 (con't)
Description
o hazardous waste pond
o contained sludge from the
cleaning of treating cylinder
and tanks
o 6 ft deep
o length - 162 ft; width = 48 ft
o surrounding berm is about 2 ft
high
o about 30 percent covered with
oil layer
6. o little contamination
o not used in many years
o very shallow
7. o creosote pond about 30 years old
o shallow in most places but is
about 20 ft in the middle
o has never been dry
8. o process water from 1970's
o part of it joins to #7
o mine shaft on one side
o sometimes dries out
9. o large pond with two mine shafts
o sometimes dries out
5-10
-------
Ul
I
DECANTERS
o o
TH&WENT
PLANT
O SLUDGE
TANK
POND 8
WWRP-I
WASTEWATER
TREATMENT
PLANT
y-IN FLOW
^WASTEWATER
HOLDING PIT
I
HWP-I
fe
POND
9
®
POND
HWP-2
NOTE'NOT TO SCALE
® SAMPLING POINT
Figure I. Waste treatment areas at International Paper, Joplin, Missouri.
-------
TABLE 3. LIQUID SAMPLE ANALYSIS FF.0,1 THE HAZARDOUS SiASTE PONS 15
AT INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY IN JOFLIN, MISSOURI
ja "•ss~~""-~sss--^^a^jaass-~s3SJ
Major Cospounds
1 ,3,5-Trisethylbenzene
2,5-Qiiethylhe*ane
3-Bethyl heptane
B-Pinene
Benzene
Chlorofcrs
Ethyibenzene
Indan
Isobutylbenzene
Iscpropylbenzene
Liicnene
Hethylene chloride
N-Butylbenzene
N-Decane
N-Heptane
M-.Honane
H-Qctane
H-Propyl benzene
N-Undecane
Styrene
r-Di ethyl benzene
•-Ethyl toluene
o-Ethyl toluene
p-Diethylbenrene
p -Ethyl toluene
p-Xylene/t-Iylene
TOTAL PARAFFINS
TOTAL OLEFWS
TOTAL AfiOHATIC KC
TOTAL KAL06ENATES HC
TOTAL UNIDENTIFIED HC
TOTAL NOIHETKANE («
rsarrgrrTTrTsssasassisssTaj^'rT^sassassasi
C
Concentration (iq/l)
a
Analysis 1 Analysis
0.6
0.01 0.1
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.1
0.3
0.7
0.04
O.B
0.3
0.6
0.9
0.2
0.2
0.1
17
0.3
4.4
0.01 0.1
10
10 22
b
2a I2b
0.1
0.3
0.02
0.3
0.02
0.03
0.02
O.I
0.1
0.1
0.4
0.02
0.01
0.2
0.3
0.04
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
9.6
0.4
1.1
0.1
11
Analysis of saiple 41972 by SCA Corporation/Technology Division using 6C/rtS.
Analysis of sasples 41973 tt 41974 by Radian Corporation using 5C/HD.
tq/1 ~ ppa assuoing a density of 1.
5-12
-------
TABLE 4. LIQUID SAMPLE ANALYSIS OF AN OIL SLICK FROH HAZARDOUS WASTE POND NO. 5
AT THE INTERNATIONAL PAPER FACILITY IN JOPLIN, MISSOURI
a,b
Conpounds Detscted Concentration (ug/1)
c
Acetone 985
Hethylene chloride 325
Total Xylenes 60
TOTAL HALQ6EMTED QR6ANICS 325
TOTAL OIYSENATED ORBAHICS 985
TOTAL ARQMATICS 60
TOTAL UNIDENTIFIED ORSANICS 6516
TOTAL NHHC 7886
a
Analysis of saiple 41973 by GCA Corporation using GC/I1S.
b
ug/1 = ppb assuring a density of 1.
c
Corrected for blank.
5-13
-------
TABLE 5. LIQUID SAMPLE ANALYSIS FROM THE PENTA RECEIVINS PDNO 14/NEAR
INFLUENT AT INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY IN JOPLIN, MISSOURI
ftajor Compounds
1,2,3-Triiethylbenzene
1,2,4-Trmthylbenzene
1 , 3 , 5-Tr i ietbyl benzene
3-Ptethyl heptane
3-Nethylpentane
Acetone
Ethylbenzene
Furfural
Indan
Isobutane
Isobutylbeazene
Itethylene chloride
N-Butane
N-Butylbenzene
N-flctaae
K-Propylbenzene
(Hbidecane
Styrene
Toluene
Total Xylsnes
t-Dietbylbenzene
•-Ethyl toluene
o-Etbyl toluene
o-Xylene
p-Di ethyl benzene
p-Xylene/i-Xylene
TOTAL PARAFFINS
TOTAL OLEFIHS
TOTAL AROMATIC HC
TOTAL HALQ6ENATED HC
TOTAL OXY6EMATED HC
TOTAL NQtHfETHANE HC
c
Concentration Ug/l)
a.
Analysis 1 Analysis 2a
8.9
5.5
4.6
0.5
4.7
10
0.1
0.1
0.3
9.1
0.5
0.5
0.7
4.8
0.2
35
7.4
1.2
390
35 44
0.5
10
46 470
b
2.0
0.7
0.7
1.3
2.6
2.2
0.9
1.6
l.S
1.0
0.6
1.4
1.7
100
14
23
0.02
140
Analysis of saiple 41982 by 6CA Corporation/Technology Division using 6C/HS.
Analysis of satples 41979 I 41980 by Radian Corporation using BC/HO.
tg/1 = ppi assuiing a density of 1.
5-14
-------
TABLE 4. LIQUID SAMPLE ANALYSIS FROM PENTA RECEIVINB POND 4 AT THE
INTERNATIONAL PAPER FACILITY IN JCPLIN, MISSOURI
a,b
Coapounds Detected Concentration (ug/1)
Acetone 4500
a
Analysis of saiple 41986 by BCA Corporation using BC/MS.
b
ug/1 - ppb assuiing a density of 1.
5-15
-------
TABLE 7. LISUID SAHPLE ANALYSIS FRQH IKE HASTEaATE1! HOLDING PCND
AT INTERNATIONAL PAPER CORPANY IN JGPLIN, HISSGURI
Major Coipounds
1,1-Dichlorosthylene
1,2,4-Triaethylbenzene
1,3,5-Triiethylbenzens
2-Etnyl-l-Butene
1-Hexene
3-HethyIheptane
4-Nonens
Acetone
B-Pinene
Benzene
Chlorofor*
Isopropylbenzene
Liaonene
Rethylene chloride
H-Butylbenzene
N-Propylbenzene
N-Undecane
Toluene
Total Xylenes
t-Diethylbenzene
t-Ethyitoluene
o-Ethyl toluene
o-lylene
p-Diethylbenzene
p-Ethyl toluene
p-Jylene/i-Kylene
TOTAL PARAFFINS
TOTAL OLEFINS
TOTAL AfiOHATIC HC
TOTAL HALQEENATE3 HC
TOTAL OXYGENATED HC
TOTAL UNIDENTIFIED HC
TOTAL NCN-HETHANE HC
ff^S== ' -- •-— — ••*»— ••*••»•—•_£•_• •_^»^»g
C
Concentration lag/I)
a
Analysis 1 Analysis
0.02
0.04
0.3
0.2
1.2
0.8
O.OS
0.04
0.2
0.1
0.6
0.05
0.2
0.3
0.1
- 0.2
0.3
0.4
17
1.2
0.2 1.8
0.2 0.02
1.2
17
19 21
b
2a & 2b
0.3
2.8
8.8
0.04
0.7
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.04
0.2
0.3
0.6
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.2
*
~12
12
2.2
0.04
28
Analysis of satple 41990 by 6CA Corporation/Technology Division using SC/ttS.
Analysis oi saiples 41987 & 41983 by Radian Corporation using BC/flD.
eg/1 = ppi assuiing a density of 1.
5-16
-------
TABLE 8. CROSS REFERENCE LIST OF SUBMITTED SAMPLES
COLLECTED AT INTERNATIONAL PAPER, JOPLIN, MISSOURI.
Sample
Identification
GCA
Control Remarks
IP-HWP-1A
IP-HWP-1B
IP-HWP-1C
IP-HWP-1D
IP-HWP-2A
IP-HWP-2B
IP-HWP-2C
IP-HWP-2D
IP-PRP-1A
IP-PRP-1B
IP-PRP-1C
IP-PRP-1D
IP-PRP-2A
IP-PRP-2B
IP-PRP-2C
IP-PRP-2D
41971
41972
41973*
41974*
41975*
41976* SAB
41977
41978
41979*
41980*
41981
41982
41983 LAB
41984* LAB
41985* LAB
41986 LAB
(continued)
5-17
-------
TABLE 8. (continued)
Sample
Identification
GCA
Control
Remarks
IP-WWRP-1A
IP-WWRP-1B
IP-WWRP-1C
IP-WWRP-1D
41987*
41988*
41989
41990
SAB
SAB = Small air bubble
LAB « Large air bubble
^Submitted to Radian Corporation, Austin, Texas.
5-18
-------
quintuplicate, as a standard procedure, with one of the five samples retained
by the facility as a split. The remaining quadruplicate liquid samples were
returned to GCA Analytical Laboratory in Bedford, MA where they were received
into the sample bank.
Sample custody and handling procedures included the use of sample tags,
chain-of-custody sheets, refrigeration of samples between sampling and
analysis, and shipping of samples in coolers sealed with custody seals. In
addition, each sample was assigned a unique sample code which linked it to the
facility, the source, and the sample point.
V. SAMPLE ANALYSIS
Analytical Summary
Tables 3 through 7 provide the analytical summary reports for all of the
process samples collected during the site visit (see Appendix A). These
tables present the major compounds quantified by either GC/MS (GCA
Corporation/Technology Division) or a multiple detection system (Radian
Corporation). The actual data report sheets for each respective sample are
provided in Appendix B and Appendix C.
Appendix D contains information on analytical procedures employed by GCA
and Radian. Aqueous and oil sample procedures were followed, including GC/FID
screening by GCA, as noted in Appendix D.
Quality Assurance
Chain of Custody
A set of samples was received by GCA/Technology Division on December 1984
for volatile organic analysis (VGA). Routine inspection upon receipt revealed
the samples to be clearly labeled and appropriately chilled. Air bubbles were
observed in some samples; these are noted in Table 8 under remarks. Upon
receipt the submitted samples were entered in the Master Log Book and assigned
GCA Control Numbers as listed in Table 8. Chain of custody procedures were
5-19
-------
followed and the samples were transferred to the locked Sample Bank for
refrigerated storage until the time of analysis. Sample custody records were
maintained throughout all laboratory procedures. Duplicate samples were
submitted to Radian Corporation of Austin, Texas under chain of custody for
volatile organic analysis (VOA).
Quality Control
Quality control protocol for volatile organics determination included the
use of surrogate spikes. Each sample was spiked with a surrogate mixture
containing dg-toluene, d^-l,2-dichloroethane, and bromofluorobenzene; these
results are shown in Table 9.
5-20
-------
TABLE 9. QUALITY CONTROL DATA FOR ANALYSIS CONDUCTED ON THE SAMPLES
COLLECTED AT INTERNATIONAL PAPER, JOPLIN, MISSOURI
SURROGATE RECOVERIES - VOLATILE ORGAN1CS.
Sample
Identification
IP-HWP-1A
IP-HWP-2D
IP-PRP-1D
IP-PRP-2D
WWRP-1D
Method Blank
Method Blank
Method Blank
Laboratory Control
GCA
Control No.
14972
41978
41982
41986
41990
01-11-85
01-14-85
05-13-95
Sample
Average Percent Recovery
Relative Standard
Deviation (7.)
D8-
Toluene
98
88
98
88
88
83
75
96
59
86
12
Bromof luorobenzene
115
99
124
84
88
90
147
99
120
107
21
D4-l,2-
Dichlorpethane
113
107
118
88
134
59
156
96
23
110
28
5-21
-------
Section 6.
Kerr McGee Chemical Company
Springfield, MO
6-1
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
.Section Page
I. Introduction 6-5
II. Waste Characterization 6-5
III. Facility Process Descriptions 6-6
Wastewater Treatment 6-6
Oil Recovery and Wastewater Treatment Process Units.... 6-8
IV. Sampling Site Description..... 6-8
Pond #1 6-8
Oil/Water Separator 6-8
Recovery Tank 6-11
Runoff Collection Pit 6-11
Quality Assurance 6-11
V. Sample Analysis 6-11
Analytical Summary 6-11
Quality Assurance. 6-16
6-2
-------
LIST OF TABLES
Table
1 Oil Recovery and Wastewater Treatment Unit Description
At Kerr McGee, Springfield, Missouri 6-10
2 Liquid Sample Analysis From Pond #1 At The Kerr McGee
Wood Treatment Facility In Springfield, Missouri 6-13
3 Liquid Sample Analysis From Pond #1, Alternate Sample
Location, At The Kerr McGee Wood Treatment Facility In
Springfield, Missouri 6-14
4 Liquid Sample Analysis From The Runoff Collection Tank At
Kerr McGee Wood Treatment Facility in Springfield,
Missouri 6-15
5 Cross Referenced List Of Submitted Samples At Kerr McGee For
Volatile Organic Analysis, Springfield, Missouri 6-17
6 Quality Control Data For Analysis Conducted On The Samples
Collected At Kerr McGee, Springfield, Missouri 6-18
6-3
-------
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure Page
1 Oil Recovery and Wastewater Treatment Flow Diagram For
Kerr Me Gee, Springfield,. Missouri 6-7
2 Oil Recovery and Wastewater Treatment Units At Kerr McGee,
Springfield, Missouri 6-9
3 Site Map, Including Hazardous Waste Management Area, For
Kerr McGee, Springfield Missouri 6-12
6-4
-------
Site: Kerr McGee
2800 W. High Street
Springfield, Missouri 65803
FCID: MOD007129406
Site Contact: Pete Gaskin
(405) 270-2395
Field Trip Personnel: Bill Battye, GCA/Engineering
Chuck Vaught, GCA/Engineering
Jim Thomas, GCA/Measurements
Visit Time and Date: November 30, 1984
9:00 a.m.
I. INTRODUCTION
The Kerr McGee facility, located in Springfield, Missouri, is a
wood-preserving plant serving the railroad industry in the treatment of cross
ties. The plant treats approximately 5,000 ft^ of vood per day while
operating 24 hours a day, five days a week. Operating since the 1940's, the
97-acre facility uses creosote as the preservative in their process. The
plant is bordered by a residential community to the north and by a railroad
track to the south. The facility currently has three active surface
impoundments for the disposal of nearly 7,000 gallons per day of wastewater
generated by the treatment process. A one-acre landfarm for the disposal of
sludge is located to the northwest behind the storage yard.
II. WASTE CHARACTERIZATION
The attached Part A Permit Profile (Appendix E) lists the wastes handled
by the facility. Creosote and the sludges associated with the treatment
process are the wastes anticipated to be present.
6-5
-------
III. FACILITY PROCESS DESCRIPTIONS
Wastewater_Treatment
Figure 1 is a flow diagram showing the process steps of oil recovery and
wastewater treatment. Wastewater from the treatment process is fed to an
underground hot well. Here the heavy oil on the bottom is sent to the
recovery tank while the lighter oil and water off the top are sent to an
oil/water separator. Oil taken off the top is then sent to the recovery tank
while the water is charged to pond #1. Also feeding into pond #1 is the
effluent scrubber water from the facility vacuum system. Feed water for the
scrubber comes from pond #2.
Pond #1 is a biologically-active surface impoundment, according to Kerr
McGee;. it is equipped with a 10-Hp aerator that was disconnected at the time
of our visit. From pond #1 the wastewater passes through a straw filter to a
second and then to a third pond, after which it is allowed to empty into the
city sewer. The city of Springfield allows no more than 100 ppm of oil and
grease in water entering the sewer. Twice a year or so the sludge is removed
from the bottom of pond #1 and sent to the hot well for reclamation of the
heavy oils. When pond #2 was relined, the bottom liner and unrecoverable
sludge were taken to the land treatment area.
The land treatment area consists of three controlled plots totaling one
acre. The site was initially prepared by tilling the soil with 20-inch
disks. The first application of sludge to the area was in November of 1980.
The application consisted of 10 percent sludge and 90 percent soil mixed
together and spread with a road grader. The second application came in the
summer of 1981 when the same mixture was applied again but this time with 30
percent sludge. Subsequently, fertilizer or lime was added to adjust the pH
and the area is tilled to a depth of 10 to 12 inches each month. Tests done
by Kerr McGee show that TOC levels have degraded to that of the surrounding
soil. As a result, Kerr McGee wishes to close the landfarm as it is too much
trouble to maintain.
Kerr McGee has also submitted plans to close the wastewater treatment
ponds. They propose to install a wastewater treatment system consisting of a
flocculation unit and a cooling tower. No definite date has been set for
these changes.
6-6
-------
OIL/WATER
SEPARATOR
air from
treatment
building
water
Figure 1. Oil recovery and wastewater treatment flow diagram for Kerr McGee,
Springfield, Missouri.
6-7
-------
Oil Recovery, and Wastewater, Treatment Process Units
Figure 2 shows the layout of the oil recovery and wastewater treatment
process units. Table 1 gives unit dimensions and descriptions.
IV. SAMPLING SITE DESCRIPTION
Wastewater samples were taken from each of the following:
o Pond #1,
o Oil/Water Separator,
o Recovery Tank, and
o Runoff Collection Pit.
All of the points sampled contained dirty water covered to some degree by an
oil slick. It should be noted that on the day the sampling took place the
wood-treating process was not in operation.
Pond #1
Two sets of water samples were taken from the biologically-active
pond #1. The first sample (Pl-1) was collected near the edge in an oil slick
as depicted by Figure 3. The second sample (Pl-2) was collected away from the
oil slick on the other side of the oil skimmer boom. Sample temperatures were
5°C.
Oil/Water, Separator
Two sets of samples were collected from the oil/water separator. About 50
percent of the water surface was covered by an oil slick. One sample was
taken at the oil-free area (ST-2) and one sample was taken at the oil slick
area (ST-1). Sample temperatures were 7°C.
6-8
-------
MAkHUII
rtMTMCtf
r
VO
U'OO
SlIHIii I AM —
ItMnCAl U.
nun i H
lull UltH i I
U.mubAi CAF —•'
tMkVOM10 IACOON «0.1
•II IIOKACI TUII
It'iM' Hl.tM
Cll.CAf.IA.
MKKII.M4 Rp-1 -RP-2/
- ——'»" —'"^i
SAMPLING LOCATION
Figure 2. Oil recovery and wastewater treatment units at Kerr McGoe, Springfield, Missouri,
-------
Table 1. OIL RECOVERY AND WASTEWATER TREATMENT UNIT DESCRIPTIONS AT
KERR McGEE, SPRINGFIELD, MISSOURI
Dimensions, and Peacriptions
Diameter » 12 ft
Height = 15 ft
Capacity a 15,000 gallons
Color: black
Open top
Oil/Water Separator Length = 60 ft
Width » height - 6 ft
Runoff Collection Pit Depth = 8 ft
Length » 30 ft
Width - 16 ft
Unused loading tank inside
that takes up about 70% of
the surface area
Pond #1 Length = 231 ft
Width - 93 ft
Depth - 5 ft
10 Hp aerator (disconnected)
oil skimming boom
biologically active
6-10
-------
Recovery Tank
One sample was taken at the recovery tank (RT-1). An oil layer existed at
the surface where the sample was taken. Sample temperature was 12°C.
Runoff.. Col lection. Pit
Two samples were collected at the runoff collection pit (RP-1 and RP-2).
Figure 3 shows the location where each was collected. Sample temperatures
were 8°C.
Quality Assurance
Sampling procedures were employed as described in the Quality Assurance
Project Plan dated 30 October 1984. Liquid samples were collected in
quadruplicate as a standard procedure. The quadruplicate liquid samples were
returned to the GCA Analytical Laboratory in Bedford, MA, where they were
received into the sample bank. The facility did not request splits, so none
were collected.
Sample custody and handling procedures included the use of sample tags,
chain-of-custody sheets, refrigeration of samples between sampling and
analysis, and shipping of samples in coolers sealed with custody seals. In
addition, each sample was assigned a unique sample code that linked it to the
facility, the source, and the sample point.
V. SAMPLE ANALYSIS
Analyt ica1 Summary
Tables 2 through A provide the analytical summary reports for all of the
process samples collected during the site visit (see Appendix A). These
tables present the major compounds quantified by either GC/MS (GCA
Corporation/Technology Division) or a multiple detection system (Radian
Corporation). The actual data report sheets for each respective sample are
provided in Appendix B and Appendix C.
6-11
-------
i ten in
IIIHAIKMIII
kOMIIAIIHCNII
UtINt
ion !'•
101(11*11 It'll M*
U(**o*«r ••*•
MIIMttUAtlt
III III! CN*II|I»I
IXUKHItl 111(1
ItUKKMIMKM
coirmii QIII
MM t«|> IUU«»«IT
Klllllir IIIUIIItKI
0 Sampling location
Figure 3. Site map, including hazardous waste management area, for Kerr McGee, Springfield, Missouri.
-------
TABLE 2. LIBUID SAMPLE ANALYSIS FROM POND il AT THE KERR HC6EE
HOOD TREATMENT FACILITY IN SFRINSFIELD, MISSOURI
Major Ccspounds
1,1-Dichlorcethylene
1,2,3-Trisethylbenzene
1 ,2,4-Trisethylbenzene
1 ,3,5-Triiethylbenzene
1-Octene
2,2,4-Triaethylpentane
2,2,5-Triaethylhexane
2,5-Diaethylhexane
3-Bethylheptane
3-Hethyipentane
Benzene
Hex anal
Ir.dan
Liaonsne
Mhylcyclohexane
Methyl cyclopentane
N-Biitane
N-Decane
N-Heptane
N-Hexane
N-Nonane
H-Propyl benzene
N-Undecane
Naphthalene
Nechexane
Styrene
Toluene
•-Ethyl toluene
o-Xyiene
p-Iylene/a-Kylene
TOTAL PARAFFINS
TOTAL OLEFINS
TOTAL AROMATIC HC
TOTAL HAL06ENATED HC
TOTAL OXY6ENATED HC
TOTAL IWIDEHTIFIED HC
TOTAL NCN-HETKANE HC
c
Concentration (ag/l)
a
Analysis 1 Analysis 2a
B.7
0.4
0.4
0.8
0.4
0.1
0.03
6.1
0.2
0.2
1.2
2.5
1.9
0.03
2.4
2.2
1.4
__._-_.
17
2.4 IB
0.4
150
d
liO 220
b
& 2b
0.02
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.02
1.9
0.3
1.3
1.6
0.02
0.03
0.1
0.1
5.3
0.4
0.1
0.2
0.3
1"
1.6
B.7
0.02
16
b
Analysis of saapls 41996 by SCA Corporation/Technology Division using SC/'HS.
Analysis of samples 41993 & 41994 by Radian Corporation using 6C/HE.
•g/1 = ppa assuming a density o-f 1.
d
Concentration of Oxygenated HC not used in Tctal NMHC calculations.
6-13
-------
TflrlE 3. LISUIB SWSPLE ANALYSIS FROM FOND tl, ALTERNATE SfifiPLE LOCATION,
AT THE KERR flCBEE HOOD TREATMENT FACILITY IN SPRINGFIELD, MISSOURI
Concentration (tg/11
Major Coapounds
1,3,5-Triaetbylbenzene
3-Metnylheptane
ft-Pinene
Acetone
Benzene
Ethylbenzsne
Indan
Indsne
Liaoneae
N-Butylbeniece
JHJscane
N-Hcnane
N-Pentane
Naphthalene
Neohexane
Toluene
•-Ethyl toluene
o-Iylene
p-Ethyltoluene
p-lylene/a-Xylene
TOTAL PARAFFINS
TOTAL OLEFINS
TOTAL ARCfiATIC HC
TOTAL OXY6ENATED HC
TOTAL NQ!H£THANE HC
..-.-.--,. -—„„——
a
Analysis 1
4
4
4
b
Analysis 2
0.5
0.3
0.3
2.2
0.8
0.5
1.4
l.S
0.2
0.7
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.2
1.0
0.4
0.4
0.3
1.0
27
0.5
B.9
2.2
d
37
Analysis of saiple 4179? by BCA Corporation/Technology Division using 6C/H5.
Analysis of sasole 42000 by Radian Corporation using 6C/HD.
eg/1 = ppa assuiing a density of 1.
Concentration of Oxygenated HC not used in Total NKHC calculation.
6-14
-------
TABLE 4. LIQUID SArlFLE ANALYSIS FRDH THE RUSCFr COLLECTIflH TANK
AT KERR-KCEEE HOOD TREATMENT FACILITY IS SPRIH6FIELD, MISSOURI
Concentration (cg/1)
Hajar Coiipounds
l,3,5--Tri2etnyibenzene
1-Nonene
1-Cctsns
3-Hethyihes3.ie
A-Pinsne
B-F'inene
C-2-Octsr.a
Diethyl ethsr
Ettiylbenzsne
Isoiwiylbenzene
H-Eutylhen:2ne
H-Sonana
N-Octane
N-Prspylfcsnzsne
Napnth.alene
Vaieraldshyde
B-SisthyIben:er.a
o-Ethyitolusns
o-Styisns
p-Iylsns/'s-itylsne
TOTAL PAMFFiaS
TOTAL OLEFISs
TOTAL AP.QHATiC HC
TOTAL QXYBLNATED KC
TOTAL MON-RSriiAliE HC
Analysis 1
NO
b
Analysis 2
1.1
1.9
0.9
1.1
8.7
3.5
i.l
3.0
3.3
3.1
13
1.5
1.7
17
2.3
0.9
16
1.5
2.2
i.a
a
37
63 d
5.2
150
d
Analysis si saapie 42004 by SCA Corporation/Technology Division using 5C/KS.
Analysis of saspls 42001 by Radian Corporation using SC/P.D.
«g/i - ?ps assuair.g a density of 1.
Concentration of uxygenated HC not used in Total KJ1HC calculation.
ND = No csapcunds dstsctsd.
6-15
-------
Analytical procedures are outlined in Appendix D. Aqueous samples were
screened by GCA using GC/FID, then analyzed using GO/MS. Oil samples were
analyzed by GC/MS.
Quality, Assurance
Chain of Custody
A set of samples was received by GCA/Technology Division on
December 1, 1984, for volatile organic analysis (VOA). Routine inspection
upon receipt revealed a discrepancy between the sample tags and the chain of
custody sheets. The project manager was notified and, as per his
instructions, corrections were made on the chain of custody sheets. Air
bubbles were observed in some samples; these are noted in Table 5 under
remarks. Upon receipt the submitted samples were entered in the Master Log
Book and assigned GCA Control Numbers as listed in Table 5. Chain of custody
procedures were followed and the samples were transferred to the locked Sample
Bank for refrigerated storage until the time of analysis. Sample custody
records were maintained throughout all laboratory procedures. Duplicate
samples were submitted to Radian Corporation of Austin, Texas, under chain of
custody for volatile organic analysis (VOA).
Quality Control
Quality control protocol for the volatile organics determination included
the use of surrogate spikes. Each sample was spiked with a surrogate mixture
containing dg-toluene, bromofluorobenzene and d4.-l,2-dichloroethane; these
recoveries are shown in Table 6.
6-16
-------
TABLE 5. CROSS REFERENCED LIST OF SUBMITTED SAMPLES
AT KERR McGEE FOR VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS,
SPRINGFIELD, MISSOURI.
Sample
Identification
KM-P1-1A
KM-P1-1B
KM-P1-1C
KM-P1-1D
KM-P1-2A
KM-P1-2B
KM-P1-2C
KM-P1-2D
KM-RP-1A
KM-RP-1B
KM-RP-1C
KM-RP-1D
KM-RP-2A
KM-RP-2B
KM-RP-2C
KM-RP-2D
KM-RT-1A
KM-RT-1B
KM-RT-1C
KM-RT-1D
KM-ST-1A
KM-ST-1B
KM-ST-1C
KM-ST-1D
KM-ST-2A
KM-ST-2B
KM-ST-2C
KM-ST-2D
GCA
Control
41993*
41994*
41995
41996
41997*
41998
41999
42000*
42001
42002
42003
42004
42005*
42006*
42007
42008
42009*
42010
42011
42012*
42013
42014
42015*
42016*
42017
42018
42019*
42020*
Remarks
SAB
SAB
SAB
SAB = Small air bubble
^Submitted to Radian Corporation, Austin, Texas.
6-17
-------
TABLE 6. QUALITY CONTROL DATA FOR ANALYSES CONDUCTED ON THE
SAMPLES COLLECTED AT KERR McGEE, SPRINGFIELD, MISSOURI.
SURROGATE RECOVERIES - VOLATILE ORGANICS
Sample
Identification
GCA
Control No.
D8- D4-l, 2-
Toluene Bromof luorobenzene Dichloroe thane
KM-P1-1D
KM-P1-2C
KM-RP-1D
KM-RP-2D
KM-RT-1C
KM-RT-1B
KM-RT-2B
Method Blank
Method Blank
Lab Control
Sample
Lab Control
Sample
41996
41999
42004
42008
42011
42014
42018
01/14/85
01/15/85
01/14/85
01/15/85
84
86
84
68
144
83
82
76
83
59
79
97
88
89
91
94
101
81
147
80
120
77
100
137
79
103
96
95
94
156
124
123
106
6-18
-------
Section 7.
McDonnell Douglass Corporation
Tulsa, OK
7-1
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section Page
I. Introduction 7-5
II. Wastestream Characterization 7-5
III. Facility Process Descriptions 7-5
Drum Storage 7-5
Wastewater Treatment. 7-5
IV. Sampling Information 7-8
Sample Location Description. 7-8
Quality Assurance 7-8
V. Sample Analysis 7-9
Analytical Summary.... 7-9
Quality Assurance 7-9
7-2
-------
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page_
1 Liquid Sample Analysis From The Clarifier At McDonnell
Douglas in Tulsa, Oklahoma 7-10
2 Cross Reference List Of Submitted Samples Collected At
McDonnell Douglas In Tulsa, Oklahoma 7-11
3 Quality Control Data For Analysis Conducted On The Samples
Collected At McDonnell Douglas in Tulsa, Oklahoma 7-12
7-3
-------
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure Page
1 Flow Diagram For The Wastewater Treatment System Employed
by McDonnell Douglas, Tulsa, Oklahoma 7-7
7-4
-------
Site: McDonnell Douglas Corporation
2000 N. Memorial Drive
Tulsa, Oklahoma 74115
FCID: OKD041501347
Site Contacts: Sherry Tippen (918) 838-6396
C. E. Brusewitz (918) 838-6140
Field Trip Personnel: Tim Curtin, GCA/Engineering
Doug Seely, GCA/Engineering
Eric Hirst, CCA/Measurements
Visit Time and Date: November 29, 1984
1:00 p.m.
I. INTRODUCTION
McDonnell Douglas Corporation is the lessee for the U.S. Air Force Plant
No. 3 in Tulsa, Oklahoma. Their main contractual responsibilities include the
subassembly of small parts, painting, and maintenance of aircraft, in
particular the U.S. Air Force C-135. They occupy the facility along with
Rockwell International Corporation, which is also under contract with the
U.S.A.F. for similar duties. The facility is located adjacent to the Tulsa
airport in an industrialized area.
II. WASTESTREAM CHARACTERIZATION
Waste materials handled by these facilities include metal hydroxide
sludges, blowdown water from the painting booth waterspray system, and some
small amounts of solvents (e.g., methylene chloride, chlorobenzene, and
chloroform have been identified at very small ppm levels in the wastewater
discharge). The total wastewater flow is generally 230-250 gpm (i.e.,
350,000 gal/day) for five or six days per week.
III. FACILITY PROCESS DESCRIPTIONS
Drum Storage
All degreaser still bottom sludges and any spent solvents not volatilized
during normal operations are drummed and transported off site. This amounts
7-5
-------
to approximately 160 drums of flammable sludges annually. These drums are
stored outside on wooden pallets until enough drums are present to constitute
a truckload (i.e., abut SO drums). This occurs approximately twice a year.
The storage area is currently open, without curbing or platform, although
efforts are underway to construct a covered storage area.
Wastewater Treatment
Rockwell International, a sub-lessee, is responsible for the operation of
the wastewater treatment plant. Upon entering the treatment system, the
wastewater is manually directed into one of four holding tanks. Two of these
tanks are open, one for highly acidic wastes and one for highly alkaline
wastes. The remaining two are closed tanks equipped with relief valves.
These are used to contain dilute acid wastes or dilute alkaline wastes,
respectively. From these holding tanks, the wastestreams are blended together
under sulfur dioxide injection to reduce chromium. A chemical flocculant is
added and the wastewater is directed to the clarifier to facilitate settling.
The sludge is removed and placed in a disposal lagoon. The overflow from the
clarifier is directed to a non-agitated oxidation basin and then discharged.
A schematic diagram of the wastewater treatment system is presented in Figure
1.
The dimensions of the open tanks and treatment basins involved during the
treatment process are provided as follows:
Old Acid Storage Tank
Old Alkaline Storage Tank
Acid Mixing Basin
52* in Diameter x 10' Deep
Length 35'6"
Width 14'
Depth 16'
Length 10'
Width 10'
Depth 11'6"
7-6
-------
__ Iflrl 4 , ... ,.
»Uj 1
IWO
C%D~* ,C|D , IWO „> tHFW» , ,, pll
MiuP ACID _ -j ' ' k • ••iiT •
^ , "OK"*1 '^0^ '"
H~* o?5
IMC f t
*CI°, . llj»04 NtOII
IWC
•OLD*
k ACID BUEO AT MTE T0
JTORAQt2 MAINTAIN pll 2.0t
cu
IWC ,
ALKALI
"HFW" 1
(*P\ * ALI(*U > M"LI ^ > MIX
WD ' ««» * ImAoei •*•"
1 'HEM* DEMOTES THAT THIS TANK WAS CONSTRUCTED DURING Tl
1966-1967 REHABILITATION.
2 'OLD' DENOTES THAT THIS TAIIX WAS TART OF THE ORIGINAL
1952-1953 PLANT CONSTRUCTION.
160 0PM
I'OLYHER 1 q0 om 1 60 OHI
"-IT n^n &fi
ill T^ +
^ '..„„(,, W-l.0.10.0 , ft MIX OXIOATIOH «««"
k o WEIL
' (jj) mn.
PH • 7. It
rn
SEWER
® SAMPLE LOCATION
E
in toict rum do. i
1UUI, OU1NQU
WILSON C'JHMI OMUIIMI
, 1 COMPANY iwir noci UWSHIU
1 AIXHIIICII 1 *"" m M JW " jw
"4l 11-0)0 "" JM. ii rine Hl-i
Figure 1. Flow diagram for the wastewater treatment system employed by McDonnell Douglas, Tulsa, Oklahoma.
-------
Alkaline Mixing Basin Length 10'
Width 10'
Depth 11"6"
Clarifier 50' in Diameter x 14' deep
Final Settling Basin
(Oxidation Basin) Length 70'
Width 16'
Depth 17'
IV. SAMPLING INFORMATION
Sample Location Description
The dilute holding tanks were the sampling locations with the highest
potential for containing volatile organics, however, they are both closed top
and not appropriate for sampling. Further downstream is an outdoor open
clarifier and an equalization basin.
Since it appeared that there was little potential for organics to be
present, only the clarifier was sampled (MD-C-1). The facility did not
request a split, so four instead of five samples from the one sample point
were taken. The sample location is designated as the clarifier (Figure 1).
Sample temperature was 18°C.
Quality Assurance
Sampling procedures were employed as described in the Quality Assurance
Project Plan dated 30 October 1984. Liquid samples were collected in
quadruplicate. The liquid samples were returned to the GCA Analytical
Laboratory in Bedford, MA, where they were received into the sample bank. The
facility did not request a split, so none was collected.
Sample custody and handling procedures include the use of sample tags,
chain-of-custody sheets, refrigeration of sample between sampling and
analysis, and shipping of samples in coolers sealed with custody seals. In
addition, each sample was assigned a unique sample code which links it to the
facility, the source, and the sample point.
7-8
-------
V. SAMPLE ANALYSIS
Analytical Summary
Table 1 provides the analytical summary reports for the process samples
collected during the site visit (see Appendix A). This table presents the
major compounds quantified by either GCA Corporation/Technology Division or
Radian Corporation. The actual data report sheets for the samples are
provided in Appendix B and Appendix C.
Appendix D contains information on GCA and Radian analytical procedures.
The aqueous sample was screened by GCA using GC/FID prior to GC/MS analysis.
Sections of Appendix D related to aqueous samples are applicable to McDonnell
Douglas samples.
Quality Assurance
Chain of Custody
A set of samples was received by GCA/Technology Division on
November 30, 1984 for volatile organic analysis (VGA). Routine inspection
upon receipt revealed the samples to be clearly labeled and appropriately
chilled. Upon receipt the submitted samples were entered in the Master Log
Book and assigned GCA Control Numbers as listed in Table 2. Chain of custody
procedures were followed and the samples were transferred to the locked Sample
Bank for refrigerated storage until the time of analysis. Sample custody
records were maintained throughout all laboratory procedures. Duplicate
samples were submitted to Radian Corporation of Austin, Texas under chain of
custody for volatile organic analysis (VGA).
Quality Control
Quality control procedures for the volatile organics analysis included the
use of surrogate spikes. Each sample was spiked with a surrogate mixture
containing ds'toluene, bromofluorobenzene and d^-l.Z-dichloroethane.
Surrogate recoveries are listed in Table 3.
7-9
-------
TABLE 1. LIQUID SABPLE ANALYSIS FROH THE CLARIFIER
AT HCQONNELL-DCU8LAS IN TULSA, GKLAHCHA
Bajer Compounds
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Acetone
Cydohexane
p-Biethylbensene
Methyl ene chloride
N-Hexane
H-Octane
Tetrachloroethylene
Trichloroethylene +
Broiodichlarcasthane
TOTAL PARAFFINS
TOTAL ARQHATIC HC
TOTAL HALQSENATED KC
TOTAL UNIDENTIFIED HC
TOTAL NCH-HETHANE KC
Concentration
a
Analysis 1
, 0.1
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.9
1.6
1.2
2.8
c
(fg/1)
Analysis
C.03
0.01
0.02
0.02
0.1
0.01
0.1
0.5
0.3
0.1
0.6
1.0
b
2a i 2fa
0.03
0.03
0.01
0.1
0.5
0.2
0.6
0.3
a
Analysis of saiple 41838 by GCA Corporation/Technology Division using SC/RS.
b
Analysis of saaples 41685 IE 41S36 by Radian Corporation using 6C/HQ.
c
ag/1 = ppi assuaing a density o^ 1.
7-10
-------
TABLE 2. CROSS REFERENCE LIST OF SUBMITTED SAMPLES COLLECTED AT
MCDONNELL DOUGLAS IN TULSA, OKLAHOMA.
Sample GCA
Identification Control
MD-C-1A 41885*
MD-C-1B 41886*
MD-C-1C 41887
MD-C-1D 41888
^Submitted to Radian Corporation, Austin Texas.
7-11
-------
TABLE 3. QUALITY CONTROL DATA FOR ANALYSIS CONDUCTED ON THE
SAMPLES COLLECTED AT MCDONNELL DOUGLAS IN TULSA, OKLAHOMA;
SURROGATE RECOVERIES - VOLATILE ORGANICS
Sample
Identification
MD-C-1D
Method Blank
GCA
Control No.
41888
01/09/85
Dg-
Toluene
87
87
Bromof luorobenzene
79
162
D4-l,2-
DichlorQethane
99
105
Average Percent Recovery 87 71 102
7-12
-------
Section 8.
Sun Petroleum Company
Tulsa, OK
8-1
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section Page
I. Introduction 8-5
II. Waste Characterization...... 8-5
Wastewater Treatment System 8-5
Landtreatment Operation 8-5
III. Waste Treatment Processes 8-5
Wastewater Treatment 8-6
Landtreatment 8-8
IV. Sampling Site Descriptions 8-9
Wastewater Treatment 8-9
Landtreatment 8-11
Quality Assurance..... 8-13
V. Sample Analysis 8-13
Analytical Summary 8-13
Quality Assurance 8-14
8-2
-------
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
1 Dimensions of open basins and tanks in the Sun Oil
Wastewater Treatment System 8-16
2 Aerator specifications for aeration basins 8-17
3 Information on tested landtreatment plots 8-18
4 Liquid sample analysis from the API separator at Sun Oil
Company in Tulsa, Oklahoma 8-19
5 Liquid sample analysis from the clarifier at Sun Oil
Company in Tulsa, Oklahoma 8-20
6 Liquid sample analysis from the equalization basin at
Sun Oil Company in Tulsa, Oklahoma 8-21
7 Liquid sample analysis from the north overflow basin at
Sun Oil Company in Tulsa, Oklahoma 8-22
8 Soil core sample analysis from the landtreatment area/
boneyard plot at the Sun Oil Company in Tulsa, Oklahoma 8-23
9 Soil core sample analysis from the landtreatment area/west
of plot #2 at the Sun Oil Company in Tulsa, Oklahoma 8-24
10 Soil core sample analysis from the landtreatment area/north
of boneyard plot at the Sun Oil Company in Tulsa, Oklahoma.. 8-25
11 Soil core sample analysis from the landtreatment area/west
of fire school at Sun Oil Company in Tulsa, Oklahoma 8-26
12 Soil core sample analysis from the landtreatment area/
plot #2, row #1 at Sun Oil Company in Tulsa, Oklahoma 8-27
13 Organic compounds screened by GC/FID on samples collected
at Sun Petroleum in Tulsa, Oklahoma 8-28
14 Cross reference list of submitted samples collected at
Sun Petroleum in Tulsa, Oklahoma 8-30
15 Quality Control data for analysis conducted on the samples
collected at Sun Petroleum in Tulsa, Oklahoma: Surrogate
recoveries - volatile organics 8-31
8-3
-------
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure
1
2
Process flow diagram for Sun Petroleum wastewater
Sampling point at Sun Petroleum open tanks and
Page
8-7
8-10
Landtreatment sampling points at Sun Petroleum, Tulsa,
Oklahoma 8-12
8-4
-------
Site: Sun Petroleum Company Tulsa Refinery
1700 South Union
Tulsa, Oklahoma 74107
FCID: OKD058078775
Site Contact: Rex Trout, Environmental Group
918/586-7572
Field Trip Personnel: Rex Trout, Environmental Group, Sun Petroleum
Sidney Cabbiness, Environmental Group, Sun Petroleum
K.C. Hustvedt, EPA
Susan Thorneloe, EPA
William Battye, GCA/Engineering
Douglas Seely, CCA/Measurements
Eric Hirst, GCA/Measurements
Visit Time and Date: November 27, 1984
10:00 a.m.
I. INTRODUCTION
The Sun Tulsa Refinery is a large complex plant located in an urban
industrial area in the western portion of Tulsa. The refinery has a crude oil
processing capacity of about 90,000 barrels per day, or about 33 million
barrels per year. Operations conducted at Sun include atmospheric
distillation, vacuum distillation, delayed coking, fluid catalytic cracking,
catalytic reforming, catalytic hydrotreating, sulfuric acid and hydrofluoric
acid alkylation, aromatics isomerization, lube oil processing, and asphalt
processing.'- The plant operates continuously.
II. WASTE CHARACTERIZATION
The Sun Tulsa Refinery includes two waste treatment processes: a
wastewater treatment system and a landtreatment operation.
Wastewater^Treatment System
The wastewater treatment system handles refinery wastewater, rainwater
runoff collected at the refinery, and a relatively small amount of wastewater
from the nearby Great Lakes Container drum reconditioning facility. The total
amount of wastewater treated is between 2.3 and 3.5 million gallons per day.
8-5
-------
Landtreatment Operation
The landtreatment operation receives sludges produced in the wastewater
treatment system. The sources of these sludges are described in detail in the
following section on WASTE TREATMENT PROCESSES. Three basic types of sludge
are landtreated: (1) solids from the oil recovery centrifuge for API
separator and dissolved air flotation (DAF) unit skimmings; (2) waste from the
sludge thickener for API separator, DAF unit, and storage tank bottoms; and
(3) aerobically digested waste biosludge from the biotreatment tank. Sludges
from the oil recovery centrifuge comprise a mixture of slop oil emulsion
solids and DAF float.
The average composition of landtreated waste is about 22 percent oil,
7 percent solids, and 71 percent water. The total volume of waste landtreated
is about 60,000 barrels (2.5 million gallons) per year. The relative volumes
of sludges treated at the Sun landtreatment facility are not known
quantitatively; however, the largest volume waste treated is waste from the
sludge thickener, which comprises mostly API separator bottoms.
III. WASTE TREATMENT PROCESSES
Wastewater^Treatment
A flow diagram for the Sun Refinery wastewater treatment system is
presented in Figure 1. Specifications of open tanks and basins in the system
are listed in Table 1. When storm runoff causes the wastewater discharge to
exceed the system treatment capacity, excess water is diverted to one of three
open overflow basins. Generally, however, the water is fed directly to an
open API oil/water separator. The water phase from the API separator is piped
to two open dissolved air flotation (DAF) units in parallel. Water from the
two primary DAF units is piped to an open equalization basin, and then to a
secondary DAF unit, which is also open.
Oil is skimmed from the API separator and from all three DAF units, and
piped to a closed storage tank. Oil and water are again allowed to separate
in the tank, and the water phase is recycled to the API separator. Oil from
8-6
-------
00
MfAfV tIMIS INfMCAll MAJOR WAUIUAllh fll)U.
UillllD IIMi IIIUKA1I IAhU IklAlln WASH).
Figure 1. Process flow diagram for Sun Petroleum wastewater treatment system, Tulsa, Oklahoma.
-------
the holding tank is centrifuged and then recycled to the refining process.
Solids from the centrifuge are sent to the landtreatment area. Oily sludges
removed from the bottoms of the API separator and the three DAF units are
charged to a sludge thickener. Water removed from the sludge thickener is
recycled to the API separator, and sludge is sent to the landtreatment area.
Water from the secondary DAF unit is piped to an open, aerated
biotreatment tank, and then to a clarifier. Sludge removed in the clarifier
comprises microbes from the biotreatment tank. A portion of this sludge is
recycled to the biotreatment tank, and a portion is fed to an aerobic
digester, and then sent to the landtreatment area. Water from the clarifier
is piped to an open fire water basin and then discharged to the Arkansas
River. The total organic carbon (TOC) concentration in water entering the
biotreatment tank is about 80 ppm, and the TOC in the final discharge is about
15 ppm. Total retention time in the entire wastewater treatment system is
about 16 hours.
Landtreatment
The total area devoted to landtreatment at the refinery is about
28 acres. The field is divided into a number of subplots. Waste is applied
to each subplot about once every 4 weeks, or less frequently when oil levels
on the subplot are too high. About 100 barrels of waste are applied per acre
per application. A subplot is tilled within 1 to 2 days after each
application, and generally in not retilled until the next application. The
tilling depth is 9 to 11 inches. The soil in the landtreatment plot is sandy
loam.
Waste from the sludge thickener (API, DAF, and tank bottoms) and
biotreatment sludge are spray applied, while centrifuge solids (API and DAF
skimmings) are dumped from dumpsters and spread with earth moving equipment.
Each subplot is generally dedicated to either sprayed waste or dumped waste,
with most subplots used for sprayed waste. Waste biosludge is dumped only 2
to 3 times per year.
8-8
-------
IV. SAMPLING SITE DESCRIPTIONS
Wagtewater Treatment
Samples were collected from four open tanks or impoundments at the Sun
Refinery:
o the API separator;
o the equalization basin following the primary DAF units;
o the clarifier following the biotreatment tank; and
o the North overflow basin.
Sampling points for open tanks and impoundments at the Sun Refinery are
illustrated in Figure 2.
API Separator
The API separator is a cylindrical tank with a rotating skimmer. The oil
layer drains over the outer edge into a narrow annulus, while water drains
from underneath the oil layer. The entire surface of the separator was
covered with a thick oil layer. One point was sampled in the oil layer
(Figure 2, point A-l). Sample temperature was 32°C.
Equalization Basin
The equalization basin contained green colored water with some suspended
solids. About 5 to 10 percent of the surface was covered with oily foam. One
point in the foam-free area was sampled. The foam layer was not sampled
because the bubbles would have been unsuitable for analysis (Figure 2,
point EB-1). Sample temperature was 33°C.
8-9
-------
API SEPARATOR
EQUALIZATION BASIN
FOAMY—
OILY
SURFACE
^EOUALIZA*
*• ,
i
i
TION BASIN
V
EB-l
a
BIOTREATMENT
o
O
NORTH OVERFLOW BASIN
CLARIFIER TANK
NORTH
BASIN
Qs) SAMPLING POINTS
NOTE- NOT TO SCALE
DRAIN TO
FIRE WATER
BASIN
Figure 2. Sampling points at Sun Petroleum open tanks
and impoundments, Tulsa, Oklahoma.
8-10
-------
Clarifier
•The clarifier consists of a cylindrical inner tank drained by an outer
ring. The water was green with some white suspended solids. The clarifier
was sampled at a point above the outlet to the fire water impoundment
(Figure 2, point C-l). Sample temperature was 27°C.
North Overflow Basin
The North overflow basin is the first in a series of three basins used for
containment of wastewater overflows when discharge volume exceeds treatment
capacity. The basin was almost dry during the visit. The surface was dark
and covered with a heavy oil layer and floating orange solids. One point was
sampled near the edge of the basin. Because of the viscosity of the oil, it
was not possible to avoid some bubbles in the sample vials (Figure 2,
point NB-1). Sample temperature was 18°C.
Landtreatment
Five subplots were sampled in the landtreatment area:
o the "boneyard" plot;
o the "North of boneyard" plot, row 5;
o the "West of fire school" plot, row G;
o plot 2, row 1 (West of fire school); and
o the plot West of plot 2.
Sampling locations are illustrated in Figure 3. Types of waste last applied
to each plot, and dates of last application and last tilling are listed in
Table 2. Sample temperatures were all 8°C.
8-11
-------
1°
H»
to
35'
100
BONEYARO
PLOT
WEST OF
FIRESCHOOL
PLOT, ROW 6
1!"
84'^n. ,..
»QS'
PLOT Z
ROW 1
t
66'
25'
UNNAMED
r
56>
NBYR- 5
NORTH OF f
BONEYARD '
PLOT
® SAMPLING POINTS
NOTE' NOT TO SCALE
Figure 3. Landtreatment sampling points at Sun Petroleum, Tulsa, Oklahoma.
-------
Quality_Assurance
Sampling procedures were employed as described in the Quality Assurance
Project Plan dated 30 October 1984. Liquid samples were collected in
quintuplicate, as a standard procedure, with one of the five samples retained
by the facility as a split. Soil core samples were collected in triplicate.
The facility split for these samples was provided in a 500-ml amber glass
bottle due to the limited supply and expense of the custom-built soil core
samplers. The remaining quadruplicate liquid samples and the duplicate soil
samples were returned to the GCA Analytical Laboratory in Bedford, MA where
they were received into the sample bank.
Sample custody and handling procedures included the use of sample tags,
chain-of-custody sheets, refrigeration of samples between sampling and
analysis, and shipping of samples in coolers sealed with custody seals. In
addition, each sample was assigned a unique sample code which linked it to the
facility, the source, and the sample point.
V. SAMPLE ANALYSIS
Analytical Summary
Tables 3 through 11 provide the analytical summary reports for all of the
process samples collected during the site visit (see Appendix A). These
tables present the major compounds quantified by either GC/MS (GCA
Corporation/Technology Division) or a multiple detector method (Radian
Corporation). The actual data report sheets for each respective sample are
provided in Appendix B and Appendix C.
Analytical procedure are outlined in Appendix B. Aqueous, oil, and soil
samples were analyzed from Sun Refinery.
8-13
-------
Qua!ity Assurance
Chain of Custody
A set of samples was received by GCA/Technology Division on
November 30, 1984 for volatile organic analysis (VGA) and extractable organic
analysis. Routine inspection upon receipt revealed the samples to be clearly
labeled and appropriately chilled. Air bubbles were observed in some samples;
these are noted in Table 13 under remarks. Upon receipt the submitted samples
were entered in the Master Log Book and assigned GCA Control Numbers as listed
in Table 13. Chain of custody procedures were adhered to and the samples were
transferred to the locked Sample Bank for refrigerated storage until the time
of analysis. Sample custody records were maintained throughout all laboratory
procedures. Duplicate samples were submitted to Radian Corporation of Austin,
Texas under chain of custody for volatile organic analysis (VGA).
Quality Control
Quality control protocol for the volatile organics analysis of the aqueous
samples included the use of surrogate spikes. Each sample was spiked with a
surrogate mixture containing dg-toluene, bromofluorobenzene and
d4~l,2-dichloroethane. Surrogate recoveries are listed in Table 14.
At this time there are no appropriate quality control procedures available
for this type of soil core analysis.
8-14
-------
REFERENCES
1. Cantrell, Aileen. Annual Refining Survey. Oil and Gas Journal.
March 21, 1984. pp. 128-153.
8-15
-------
TABLE 1. DIMENSIONS OF OPEN BASINS AND TANKS IN THE SUN OIL
WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM
Unit
API separator
Equalization basis
Secondary Clarifiers (2)
DAF unit #1
DAF unit #2
Aeration basins (2)
Firewater basin
South storm surge pond
North storm surge pond
East storm surge pond
Area
(m2)
221
1,820
40
221
221
910
811
1,516
1,900
7,291
Length
(m)
16.8
42.7
22.9
16.8
16.8
42.7
29.6
NA
NA
NA
Average
depth (m)
2.5
4.9
3.0
3.9
3.7
3.7
5.9
3.0
3.0
2.4
NA - not available
8-16
-------
TABLE 2. AERATOR SPECIFICATIONS FOR AERATION BASINS
Number of aerators (each basin) 2
Power rating (each aerator) 75 hp
Oxygen transfer rating 3.0 Ibs/hp-hr
Impeller diameter 50 cm
Impeller rotational speed 1180 rpm
8-17
-------
TABLE 3. INFORMATION ON TESTED LANDTREATMENT PLOTS
Plot or row
History of waste (dates)
Length Width Last
(m) (m) application Tillings since application
Boneyard plot 76 67 11-16-84
Plot N of boneyard,
row 5 108 4.6 9-6-84
Plot W of Fireschool,
row 6 73 4.9 10-12-84
Plot 2, row 1 227 4.6 10-10-84
Plot W of Plot 2 143 109 11-8-84
11-16
9-17; 9-13; 10-12
10-15; 11-9
10-11
11-16
8-18
-------
TABLE 4. LIBUID SAHPLE ANALYSIS FRQH THE API SEPARATOR
AT SUN OIL COMPANY IN TULSA, OKLAHOMA
a,b
Major Coapounds Concentration (sg/I)
Acetone
Benzene
Chlorofon
Hethylene chloride
Toluene
TOTAL AROHATIC KC
TOTAL HALOGENATED KC
TOTAL OXYGENATED HC
TOTAL NON-METHANE HC
18
5.1
1.5
1C
13
18
12
13
48
a
Analysis of saaple 41913 by SCA Corporation/Technology Division using SC/KS.
b
= ppi assuiing a density of 1.
8-19
-------
TABLE 5.
LIQUID SAHPLE ANALYSIS FROR THE CLARIFIER
AT SUN OIL COMPANY IN TULSA, OKLAHOMA.
Major Cospounds
1-Cecene
1-Propanol
1-Undecene
2,3-Diaethylbutane
2,5-SiaethyIhsxane
3-Hetnylpentane
Chiorofor*
Cyclopentane
Isoheptane
Isohexane
Mhylcyclohexane
H-Decane
H-Gctane
H-Undecane
Naphthalene
T-4-Hethyl-2-pentene
Toluene
o-EthyltDluene
TGTAL PARAFFIHS
TOTAL QLEFIKS
TOTAL AROHATIC HC
TOTAL HALQ6ESATED HC
TOTAL OXY6ESATED HC
TOTAL UNIDENTIFIED HC
TOTAL SOH-HETHAHE HC
Concentration (ag/I)
Analysis 1
10
0.01
10
3.4
13.4
Analysis 2a & 2b
0.04
0.02
0.03
0.1
0.2
O.a
0.02
1.9
0.2
0.1
0.03
0.01
0.3
0.1
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.1
0.3
O.i
0.1
1.4
0.02
1.8
3.5
0.6
0.3
0.6
6.7
d
Analysis of saiple 41917 by 6CA Corporation/Technology Division using BC/HS.
Analysis of saaples 41714 & 41915 by Radian Corporation using SC/H9.
sg/1 = ppa assuring a density of 1.
Concentration of Oxygenated HC not used in Total NHHC calculation.
8-20
-------
TABLE 6. LI3UID SAMPLE ANALYSIS FROM THE EQUALIZATION
3ASIN AT SUS OIL COMPANY IK TULSA, OKLAHOMA
Major Caspounds
1 ,3,5-Triaethylbenzene
1-Propanol
1-Undecene
2,3-BiBethylbutane
2,4-Di»ethylpentane
2-Butanone
2-Methyl-2-pentene
2-Propanol
3-MethyIpentane
4-Hetnyl-l-pentene
Acetone
B-Pinene
Benzene
Chlornfcn
Cyclohexane
Cyclopentane
Di ethyl ether
Ethylbenzene
Isoheptane
Isohexane
Lieonene
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methylcyclohexane
Methyl ene chloride
N-Butar.e
N-Nonane
N-Propylben:ene
H-L'ndecane
Seohexane
Styrene
Toluene
Total Jylenes
;i-Ethy I toluene
p-Isopropyltoluene
p-Xylene/s-Xylene
TOTAL PARAFFINS
TOTAL OLEFIHS
TOTAL AROMATIC HC
TOTAL HALOSENATED HC
TOTAL OXYSENATED HC
TOTAL NON-KETHASE KC
c
Concentration (ag/li
a
Analysis 1 Analysis
0.01
0.03
HO
0.01
0.01
0.03
3.1
14
5.7
0.1
0.03
1.2
0.1
0.2
110
0.06
1.7
0.01
0.02
0.02
12 3.3
4.1
0.2
.„„_
0.4
30 9.6
7.4 0.01
110 0.04
d
150 20
b
2a & 2b
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.1
4.1
0.1
0.5
0.04
0.02
0.01
0.02
0.02
0.1
0.01
0.2
8.2
0.02
0.02
To"
0.2
13
C.01
0.02
d
14
b
Analysis of saaple 41921 by SCA Corporation/Technology Division using SC/MS.
Analysis of saaplss 41913 ** 41919 by Radian Corporation using 3C/MD.
sg/1 = Ppa assuming a density of 1.
Concentration of Qsygsnated HC not used in Total SKHC calculation.
-------
TABLE 7. LISUID SAHPLE ANALYSIS FRQH THE NORTH DVEHFUW
BASIN AT SUN OIL COMPANY IN TULSA, OKLAHOMA
Ifajor Coapounds
Acetone
Benzene
Chlorofora
Hetfiylene chloride
Styrene
Toluene
Total lylenes
TOTAL AflOHATIC HC
TOTAL HALQSENATED KC
TOTAL UNIDENTIFIED HC
TOTAL NOIHETHANE HC
Concentration (sg/l)
a,b
120
23
11
300
2.5
210
290
310
130
730
b
Analysis of saeple 41925 by 6CA Corporation/Technology Division using BC/HS.
ig/1 - ppa assuming a density o-f 1.
8-22
-------
TABLE 8. SOIL CDRE SAHPLE ANALYSIS FRQH THE LANDTREATHENT AREA/
BQNEYARD PLOT fiT THE SUN OIL COMPANY IN TULSA, OKLAHOMA
Concentration
Hajor Cospounds
1,2,3-Triaethyibenzene
2,2,5-Triiethylhexane
2,3-Diaethylbutane
2,4-Diaethylpentane
3-Hethylheptane
3-ltethylpentane
Cyclohexane
Etnylbenzene
Isobeptane
Isonexane
Isapentane
Isspropylbenzene
Nethylcyclopentane
Hetnylene chloride
N-Butane
H-Hexane
N-Octane
N-Pentane
H-Propylbenzene
Nechexane
Styrene
o-Ethyltoluene
p-Ethyitoluene
p-Xylene/s-Xylene
TOTAL PARAFFINS
TOTAL OLEFINS
TOTAL AROMATIC HC
TOTAL BALQ6ENATED HC
TOTAL OXYGENATED HC
TOTAL NON-METHANE HC
Analysis 1
Soil Core(ug/g)
Analysis 2
Solid(ug/g)
1.3
0.70
1.5
ND
81
0.5
89
Vapor(ug/i3)
190 190
260
349
200
650
22000
160
160
780
700
130
640
11000
260
26000
140
3300
280
2700
170
170
130
160
61000
780
HOC
11000
68
d
74000
250
870
26000
280
220
1000
770
150
840
18000
220
33000
160
3900
320
3300
200
160
76000
900
IBM
18000
77
d
97000
b
Analysis of saaple 41947 by BCA Corporation/Technology Division using EC/MS.
Analysis of saaple 41946 (solid and duplicate soil vapor) by Radian Corporation using 6C/HD.
ug/g = pps assuiing a density of 1.
Concentration of Oxygenated HC not used in Total NRHC calculation.
ND = 3o coascunds detected.
8-23
-------
TABLE 9. SOIL CORE SAHPLE ANALYSIS FROH THE LAHDTHEATMEMT flREA/
OF PLOT 2 AT THE SUN OIL CQKPAHY IN TULSA, OKLAHOHA
Hajor Coipounds
1,1-DichloroethyIene
1,2-Dichloropropane
1-Hexene
1-Octene
2,2,5-Trisethyihexane
2,3,4-Triietnylpentane
2,3-Diaethylbutane
2,4-Diietnylpentane
2,5-Disethylhexane
3-flethyl heptane
3-NethyIheitane
3-Hetnylpentane
Chlorosethane
Cyclohexane
Cyclopentans
IsDbutane
Isobutene *• i-Butene
Isoheptane
Isohexane
Isopentane
rtethylcyclohexane
Nethylcyclopentane
Sethyiene chlorids
Si-Butane
N-Hsiane
N-Pentane
Neohexane
Trichloroethylene +
Brciodi chl oroaethane
TOTAL PARSFFIHS
TDTfiL OLEFIHS
TOTAL KALGSENATED HC
TOTAL NON-HETHAHE HC
c
Concsntraticn
a
Analysis 1 Analysis
Soil Core(ug/g) Solid (ug/g!
0.3
0.2 0.3
13 1.7
2.0 2.1
3.0 i.8
1.5
2.0 2.2
1.2
2.2 2.6
0.2 1.5
0.6
0.3
12 110
110 6.4
.9 3.1
d
NO 120 130
b
2
Vapor (ug '§31
31
360
57
39
27
370
180
46
2200
67
62
350
320
46
420
2100
43
1700
450
2BOO
9800
2800
13000
b
d
Analysis of sasple 41949 by SCA Corporation/Technology Division using 5C/HS,
Analysis of saaple 41943 (duplicate solid and soil vapor) by Radian Corporation using SC/fiD.
iig/g = cpa assuming a density o-f 1.
HD = 9o cospoands detected.
8-24
-------
TABLE 10. SOIL CGRE SAMPLE ANALYSIS FRQK THE LANBTREATHENT AREA/NORTH
OF BDNEYARD PLOT AT THE SUN OIL COMPANY IN TULSA, OKLAHOMA
Ha jar Caspounds
1,2,4-Trisethylbenzene
I-Octene
2,2,5-Triietbylhexarie
2,4-Diaethylpentane
3-Hethyl heptane
3-Hethylpentane
4-Nonene
Chlorotetnane
Cyclopentane
Ethyl benzene
Indene
Isobutane
Isohexane
Isopentane
Isopropylbenzene
tethylene chloride
H-Decane
N-Kexane
N-Konans
?H3ctane
N-Pentane
Neohesane
Styrene
Toluene
i-Ethyltoluene
p-Xylene/i-Xylene
TOTAL PARAFFINS
TOTAL OLEFINS
TOTAL AROHATIC HC
TOTAL HftLOBEHATED HC
TOTAL OIY6EMTEO HC
TOTAL NQS-SETHANE HC
c
Concentration
a
Analysis 1 Analysis
Soil Coretug/g) Solid (uq/g)
2.3
l.i
3.3
17
2.6
3.0
* i
t.O
1.6
l.B
2.0
2.8
11 6.4
2.7
17
2.1
5.2
2.3
4.0
2.S
2.1
.._„_.
15
23
1! 15
1.7
d
11 200
"
b
2
Vapor (ug/335
27
64
1900
75
92 -
59
430
2400
230
220
"5300"
430
5700
b
Analysis of saaple 41951 by SCA Corporation/Technology Division using SC/ilS.
Analysis of sasple 41950 by Radian Corporation using SC/HB.
ug/g = ppa assuming a density of 1.
Concentration of Oxygenated HC not used in Total nfiHC calculation.
8-25
-------
TABLE 11. SOIL CORE SAMPLE ANALYSIS FROH THE LANDTREATHENT AREA/NEST
OF FIRE SCHOOL AT SUS OIL COMPANY IN TULSA, GKLAHGHA
Major Caapounds
1,1-Dichloroethylene
1,2,3-Trisethylbenzene
1, 2, 4-Triaethyl benzene
1 ,3,5-Trisethylbenzene
1-Decene
1-Undecene
2,2,5-Triiethylhexane
2,3,4-Triiethylpentane
2,3-Diaethylbutane
2,5-Diiethylhexane
3-fiethylheptane
3-Hetnylhexane
3-Kethylpentane
B-Pinene
ChloroBethane
Cyclobexane
Cyclopentane
Isoheptane
Isohexane
Isopentane
Rethykyclohexane
Hethylcyclopentane
ftethylsne chloride
H-Decane
H-Kexane
N-Nonane
N-Pentane
H-Propyl benzene
N-Undecane
Neohexane
Styrene
Toluene
o-Ethyl toluene
p-Diethylbenzene
p-Xylene/i-Xylene
TOTAL PARAFFINS
TOTAL OLEFIHS
TOTAL ARGHATIC HC
TOTAL HALDBENATED HC
TOTAL OXYSEHATED HC
TOTAL HQH-RETHANE HC
c
Concentration tag/1)
a
Analysis 1 Ana
Soil Coretug/q) Solid(ug/g)
!6
17
15
17
32
23
25
19
55
22
13 45
25
1200
33
23
21
16
29
25
4 I
it
2200
110
190
13 160
18 2700
b
lysis 2
Vapor fug/93)
590
560
490
470
840
640
1200
530
13000
1400
1700
760
710
1200
9600
23000
3000
3000
510
610
63000
2300
4000
9600
110
d
85000
d
Analysis of saaple 41953 by SCA Corporation/Technology Division using SC/HS.
Analysis of saiple 41952 by Radian Corporation using SC/HS.
ug/g = ppa assuaing a density of 1.
Concentration of Oxygenated HC not used in Total NHHC calculation.
-------
TABLE 12. SOIL CORE SAMPLE ANALYSIS FRGH THE LANBTREATHENT AREA/
PLOT 12, R0» II AT SOS OIL COMPANY IN TULSA, OKLAHQHA
Major Cospcunds
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1-Nonene
2,2,5-Triaethylnexane
2,3-Bisethylbutane
3-Hethylheptane
3-Methylhexane
3-ilethylpentane
Cydohexane
Cyclopentane
Ethylbenzene
Indene
Isohestane
Isohexane
Isopentane
Kethylcyclohexane
Methylcyclopentane
Hethylene chloride
N-Butane
H-Decans
N-Hexane
H-Pentane
N-Propyl&enzene
N-Undecane
Hechexane
TOTAL PARAFFINS
TOTAL OLEFINS
TOTAL ARCHATIC HC
TOTAL HALOSENATED HC
TOTAL OXYBENATED HC
TOTAL NON-HETHANE HC
c
Concentration iig/1)
a b
Analysis 1 Analysis 2
Soil Core(ug/g} Salid(ug/gi Vapor (ug/a3)
1.3
600
340
1200
1000
950
3800
840
73000
370
l.a
1300
5000
1500
1000
3000
26000
380
1.3
120000
9700
490
1.4
E300
____.. "240000"
iTr.rt
i/VU
5.3 32GO
4.0 27000
110
e . d
ND 140 280000
b
d
Analysis of saipls 41955 by SCA Corporation/Technology Division using EC/US.
Analysis of saaple 41954 by Radian Corporation using EC/MD.
ug/g = ppa assuaing a density of 1.
Concentration of Oxygenated HC not used in Total NHHC calculation.
HD = Not detected.
8-27
-------
TABLE 13. ORGANIC COMPOUNDS SCREENED BY GC/FID ON SAMPLES COLLECTED
AT SUN PETROLEUM IN TULSA, OKLAHOMA.
Compound
1. Methanol*
2. Methylene chloride
3. Acetone
4. Trichlorofluoromethane
5. 1,1-Dichloroethane
6. Allyl alcohol*
7. 1,1-Dichloroethane
8. Trans-l,2-dichloroethene
9. Ethyl ether*
10. Chloroform
11. 2-Butanone
12. 1,2-Dichloroe thane
13. Isobutanol*
14 . 1 , 1 , 1-Tr ich loroe thane
15. Carbon tetrachloride
16. Dichlorobromomethane
17. 1-Butanol*
18. 1,2-dichloropropane
19. Cis-l,3-dichloropropene
20. Tr ich loroe thene
21. Benzene
Relative Retention
Time to Benzene
*
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
079
317
342
426
466
512
551
592
612
637
678
684
764
767
790
838
859
922
942
974
00
(continued)
8-28
-------
TABLE 13, (continued)
Relative Retention
Compound Time to Benzene
22. Trans-1,3-dichloropropene 1.03
23. 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 1.03
24. Dibromochloromethane 1.03
25. Hexane* 1.10
26. Ethyl aerylate* 1.14
27. Bromoform 1.21
28. 2-Hexanone 1.24
29. 4-Methyl-2-pentanone 1.34
30. 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1.37
31. Toluene 1.45
32. Chlorobenzene 1.53
33. Ethylbenzene 1.66
34. Styrene* 1.86
35. m-Xylene 1.88
36. o-Xylene 1.92
37. p-Xylene 1.99
GC Conditions: HP 5890 ft. x 1/8 inch OD column packed with 1% SP-1000
on 60/80 Mesh Carbopack B; Temperature Program: 60°C for 2
minutes, 60°C to 230°C at 10°C/min., then 230°C for 11
minutes; carrier gas: 36 ml Helium/minute; injector
temperature = 230°C.
*Area counts determined for a single concentration standard only. All other
compounds were determined over a dilution series.
8-29
-------
TABLE 14. CROSS REFERENCE LIST OF SUBMITTED SAMPLES
COLLECTED AT SUN PETROLEUM IN TULSA, OKLAHOMA.
Sample
Identification
GCA
Control
Remarks
SA-1A
SA-1B
SA-1C
SA-1D
SC-1A
SC-1B
SC-1C
SC-1D
SEB-1A
SEB-1B
SEB-1C
SEB-1D
SNB-1A
SNB-1B
SNB-1C
SNB-1D
SLT-BY-1A (S-18)
SLT-BY-1B (S-22)
SLT-BY-1A (S-23)
SLT-BY-1B (S-21)
SLT-NBYR5-1A (S-16)
SLT-NBYR5-1B (S-14)
SLT-WFSR6-1A (S-20)
SLT-WFSR6-1B (S-12)
SLT-21-1A (S-20)
SLT-21-1B (S-25)
41910*
41911*
41912
41913
41914*
41915*
41916
41917
41918*
41919*
41920
41921
41922*
41923*
41924*
41925
41946*
41947
41948*
41949
41950*
41951
41952*
41953
41954*
41955
SAB
SAB
LAB
LAB
LAB
LAB
SAB - Small air bubble
LAB * Large air bubble
*Submitted to Radian Corporation, Austin, Texas.
8-30
-------
TABLE 15. QUALITY CONTROL DATA FOR ANALYSIS CONDUCTED ON THE
SAMPLES COLLECTED AT SUN PETROLEUM IN TULSA, OKLAHOMA:
SURROGATE RECOVERIES - VOLATILE ORGANICS
Sample
Identification
GCA
Control No.
Da-
Toluene
Bromofluorobenzene
D4-l,2-
Dichloroethane
SA-1D
SC-1D
SEB-1D
SNB-1D
Method Blank
Method Blank
41913
41917
41921
41925
01/09/85
01/11/85
Average Percent Recovery
Relative Standard Deviation (%)
108
102
105
92
88
83
96
10
105
103
131
119
114
90
110
14
93
102
92
MI
91
59
87
16
MI « Matrix interference
8-31
-------
Section 9.
TRI Container, Incorporated
Catoosa, OK
9-1
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section
I. Introduction
II. Waste Characterization
III. Facility Process Description 9-5
Wastewater Treatment System 9-7
IV. Sampling Information
Sample Location Description.
Quality Assurance
V. Sample Analysis
Analytical Summary.
Quality Assurance..
9-2
-------
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
1 Tank Parameters At TRI Container, Catoosa, Oklahoma 9-8
2 Surface Impoundment Parameters At TRI Container,
Catoosa, Oklahoma..... 9-9
3 Liquid Sample Analysis From The Runoff Lagoon #1 At Tulsa
Reconditioning, Incorporated In Tulsa, Oklahoma 9-13
4 Liquid Sample Analysis From Runoff Lagoon #1 at TRI, Tulsa,
Oklahoma 9-14
5 Liquid Sample Analysis From The Runoff Lagoon #2 At TRI,
Tulsa, Oklahoma 9-15
6 Liquid Sample Analysis From The Runoff Lagoon #2 At TRI,
Tulsa, Oklahoma 9-16
7 Liquid Sample Analysis From The Runoff Lagoon #3 At TRI,
Tulsa, Oklahoma 9-17
8 Cross Referenced List Of Submitted Samples Collected At
TRI Container, Catoosa, Oklahoma 9-18
9 Quality Control Data For Analysis Conducted On The Samples
Collected At TRI Container, Catoosa, Oklahoma 9-19
9-3
-------
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure Page
1 Sampling Locations at TRI, Tulsa, Oklahoma 9-11
9-4
-------
Site: TRI Container, Inc.
P.O. Drawer K
Catoosa, Oklahoma 74015
Site Contact: Tag Webb, President
(918) 234-5100
Field Trip Personnel: Tim Curtin, GCA/Engineering
Chuck Vaught, GCA/Engineering
Jim Thomas, GCA/Measurements
Visit Time and Date: November 28, 1984
1:00 p.m.
I. INTRODUCTION
TRI Container, Inc., a five acre facility located in a rural region of
Catoosa, Oklahoma, is involved in the reconditioning of used lube oil drums
for reuse in the petroleum distribution industry. The vast majority of the
drums come from oil companies such as Texaco, Philips, Sun, Conoco and
others. Here they recondition approximately 250,000 drums per year. Of this
total, approximately 5,000 drums which contained non-lube oil substances are
reconditioned. TRI will accept no drums that contain pesticides or PCBs.
II. WASTE CHARACTERIZATION
TRI, being a non-RCRA facility, has not submitted any Part A data. The
three surface impoundments on the site were thought to primarily contain lube
oils and caustic soda from the drum cleaning process.
III. FACILITY PROCESS DESCRIPTIONS
TRI's process of drum reconditioning is somewhat labor intensive.
Although certain phases of the drum handling are automated, most of the
processing steps depend on manual labor. The initial step in drum
reconditioning is the draining and reclamation of any residual lube oils
present in the drums. Each drum is inverted and allowed to drain into a pit
9-5
-------
where residual oils are reclaimed. Approximately 1000 gallons per week of
lube oil are recovered in this manner and sold by TRI for use as chain oil.
The inside of each drum is chemically cleaned by inverting the drum and
spraying into it a warm caustic soda solution. The caustic soda solution
drains back into a tank where it is recirculated through this process. After
passing through the inside cleaning process, the outside of the drums are also
chemically cleaned using the same caustic soda solution. This is a two stage
process that also recirculates the caustic soda solution for reuse. Once
through the cleaning process, the drums are rinsed with water. Approximately
1/2 to 1 gallon of water is used to rinse each drum. This rinse water, which
contains some residual caustic, is sent to the wastewater treatment system.
To this point the process has operated outside of the confines of the main
building. After leaving the rinse phase, the drums are drained and taken into
the building where they are steam dried to remove any water left in the drum.
Immediately after this, a suction pipe is placed in the drum to draw out any
water vapor. A visual inspection is made of the drum to check for cleanliness
and rust. If the drums appear to be rusty, then they are set aside and placed
in the acid room. Mr. Webb estimates that about 25 percent of all drums will
end up here. In the acid room the drum in inverted and hydrochloric acid is
sprayed up into the drum for about five minutes. Following this the drum is
allowed to drain for about two minutes, after which it is rinsed with water.
The acid which is drained from the drum is continuously reused while the rinse
water containing residual acid is sent to the wastewater treatment system.
In cases where the drum rust is extensive or severe, the drum is taken to
a chain cleaner. At the chain cleaner the drum is filled with about three
gallons of a dilute caustic soda solution and 20 feet of chain is placed in
it. The barrel is rotated while being tilted back and forth at about a
45 degree angle. Ten drums are treated at a time. Every two minutes a new
drum is loaded on and another is removed so each drum is processed for
20 minutes. The caustic soda solution used is recirculated within the system.
If a drum has required treating at the chain cleaner and/or the acid room,
then the drum is sent to be "pickled." In the "pickling" process the drum is
sprayed with a mixture of sodium nitrate and sodium metasilicate. This
9-6
-------
process coats the drum on the inside and prevents "flash back". Flash back is
the immediate oxidation of the drum. The moist environment along with the
acid treatments promote rust development. If the drum has required rust
treatment, then it is rinsed and placed back on line at the steam dry unit.
Once a drum has passed through the visual inspection, it is sent for
reshaping. The reshaping machine pressurizes the drum to push out dents while
rotating the drum within a shaping chamber. Once the drums are reshaped they
are pressurized to 70 psi and submerged in water to check for leaks. If no
leaks are found, then new bung hole caps and seals are placed on the drums,
they are painted, allowed to dry and loaded onto trucks.
Wastewater Treatment_.System
At TRI, wastewater is sent to the wastewater treatment system from
two process areas: 1) the caustic soda rinse and 2) the acid rinse. Each of
these process streams is fed to a holding tank which in turn feeds to the
flocculation unit. The flocculation unit removes the solids, which are
transferred and placed as sludge into a sludge tank. About every eight
working days the sludge tank, with a capacity of 5,000 gallons, is emptied by
Chemical Resources, Inc., from Tulsa, Oklahoma, and trucked to their deep well
injection facility. The treated wastewater goes to one of three water storage
tanks to be reused in the process. TRI treats roughly 300,000 gallons of
wastewater per year through this system. Relevant tank parameters are given
in Table 1.
The State of Oklahoma has required TRI to contain all rainwater runoff in
impoundments. There are three surface impoundments on the east side of the
facility (Table 2). All the dirty drums for processing are stored on higher
ground to the west. The processing facility lies between the drum storage
area and the impoundments. Soil at the drum storage area appeared to be
heavily saturated with lube oil and a heavy rainfall causes considerable
quantities of oil to be deposited in the impoundments from the storage area.
Mr. Webb stated that this oil is often times skimmed and recovered from the
impoundments.
9-7
-------
TABLE 1. TANK PARAMETERS AT TRI CONTAINER, CATOOSA, OKLAHOMA.
Water Storage Tanks (3)
height - 15 ft
diameter » 10 ft
capacity = 8,000 gallons
color » silver
constructed of steel
no roof
Holding Tank
capacity « 12,000 gallons
constructed of steel
underground
Sludge Tank
capacity « 5,000 gallons
constructed of steel
underground
Settling Tank
height » 20 ft
diameter - 10 ft
capacity = 10,000 gallons
color * grey
constructed of steel
no roof
9-8
-------
Table 2. SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT PARAMETERS AT TRI CONTAINER,
CATOOSA, OKLAHOMA.
Length (ft) Width (ft) Depth (ft)
SI I 90 60 unknown
SI II 120 60 unknown
SI III 200 90 unknown
9-9
-------
SAMPLING INFORMATION
Sample Locatign^Descriptipn
Samples were taken from each of the three rainwater runoff surface
impoundments:
o Runoff Lagoon (Pond) 1,
o Runoff Lagoon (Pond) 2,
o Runoff Lagoon (Pond) 3.
Figure 1 shows the location of each sampling point. Two samples each were
collected from ponds number 1 (ROL1-1 and ROL1-2) and number 2 (ROL2-1 and
ROL2-2), and one sample was taken from pond number 3 (ROL3-1). Pond number 1
and pond number 2 had a fraction of the surface covered with an organic
layer. In each of these ponds, samples were taken from both the organic slick
area and the area free of the organic layer. Pond number 3 appeared
homogeneous so only one sample was collected. All of the samples appeared to
be clear with an olive green cast.
Quality Assurance
Sampling procedures were employed as described in the Quality Assurance
Project Plan dated 30 October 1984. Liquid samples were collected in
quintuplicate, as a standard procedure, with one of the five samples retained
by the facility as a split. The remaining quadruplicate liquid samples were
returned to GCA Analytical Laboratory in Bedford, MA where they were received
into the sample bank.
Sample custody and handling procedures included the use of sample tags,
chain-of-custody sheets, refrigeration of samples between sampling and
analysis, and shipping of samples in coolers sealed with custody seals. In
addition, each sample was assigned a unique sample code which linked it to the
facility, the source, and the sample point.
9-10
-------
200'
POND
TRI-ROL3-JA-D
1 / "^
• — ^/ ' —
T / POND *2 ^ r~ 8 "\ 1
r 1 /
* 1 ®TRI-ROL2-2A-0 TRI'ROL2-|A-Dy ( ®
— ' -^ — ay VIRI
TRI-ROLI-2A-D\ T ,
POND*1 J 60
-ROLI-IA-D J 1
i *"* ^ i i <
ooo
HOLDING
TANKS
\C\i ^
r ^\
CONCRETE
SLAB X \
/SLUDGEN
t TANK J
,
T
200'
BUILDING -J-
80'x 200*
DRUM
STORAGE
AREA
NOTE:NOT TO SCALE
$ SAMPLING POINT
Figure 1. Sampling locations at TRI, Tulsa, Oklahoma.
9-11
-------
V. SAMPLE ANALYSIS
Analytical Summary
Tables 3 through 7 provide the analytical summary reports for all of the
process samples collected during the site visit (see Appendix A). These
tables present the major compounds quantified by either GC/MS (GCA
Corporation/Technology Division) or a multiple detection system (Radian
Corporation). The actual data report sheets for each respective sample are
provided in Appendix B and Appendix C.
Appendix D contains information regarding analytical procedures employed
by GCA and Radian. GCA employed GC/FID screening on aqueous samples as
indicated. Aqueous and oil samples were analyzed.
Quality, Assurance
Chain of Custody
A set of samples was received by GCA/Technology Division on November 30,
1984 for volatile organic analysis (VOA). Routine inspection upon receipt
revealed the samples to be clearly labeled and appropriately chilled. Air
bubbles were observed in some samples; these are noted in Table 8 under
remarks. Upon receipt the submitted samples were entered in the Master Log
Book and assigned GCA Control Numbers as listed in Table 8. Chain of custody
procedures were adhered to and the samples were transferred to the locked
Sample Bank for refrigerated storage until the time of analysis. Sample
custody records were maintained throughout all laboratory procedures.
Duplicate samples were submitted to Radian Corporation of Austin, Texas under
chain of custody for volatile organic analysis (VOA).
Quality Control
Quality control protocol for the volatile organics analysis included the
use of surrogate spikes. Each sample was spiked with a surrogate mixture
containing dg-toluene, bromofluorobenzene and d4~l,2-dichloroethane.
Surrogate recoveries are listed in Table 9.
9-12
-------
TABLE 3. LIQUID SAHPLE ANALYSIS FROH THE RUNOFF LASOCN ti AT
TULSA RECONDITIONING, INCORPORATED IN TULSA, OKLAHORA
a,b
Hajor Coapounds Concentration (§g/l)
Acetone 22
Chlorofora , 2
Ethylbenzene 25
Hethylene chloride &
Tetrachloroethylene 6
Toluene 22
Total lylenes 44
Trichloroethylene 2
TOTAL AROKATIC HC 65~
TOTAL HALOSENATED HC 16
TOTAL OXYBESATED HC 22
TOTAL UHIDESTIFIED HC 560
TOTAL NCN-HETHANE HC 660
a
Analysis of saiple 41929 by SCA Corporation/Technology Division using SC/HS.
b
sg/1 - ppa asstiaing a density oi 1.
9-13
-------
TABLE 4.
LISUID SAMPLE A?iALYSI3 FRO« RUHOFF LASCGS il AT
TULSA RECGNDITIGNiNS, ISCORfuRATEU IS TuLSA, CKLAHGUA
Concentration (eg/1)
a
Hajor Ccsoounds
2-Butanone
Acstcns
Acetcnitrils
B-Pinena
Benisne
Cnlarotcra
Ethylbenzsne
Kethyisne chiaritis
H-Proaylbenzene
JK'ndacsne
Toluene
Total lyienes
Tricnloroetnane
•-Oiethylbenzsne
p-Diethyi5enrene
p-Ethyl toluene
p-lseprcpyitoluene
TOTAL PARAFFIHS
TOTAL OLE-INS
TOTAL ASQ.1ATIC HC
TOTAL HALQGENATED KC
TOTAL OXYS-SATE3 HC
TOTAL US1SENTIFIE2 HC
TOTAL NCN-BETKAHE HC
Analysis 1
0.3
0.4
0.04
0.1
0.6
0.1
0.1
0.02
0.4
0.6
0.6
l.S
4.1
Analysis 2a & 2fc
0.02
0.04
O.i
0.2
IT
0.02
0.3
1.0
3.3
0.5
0.04
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.04
0.3
0.1
0.1
0.1
IT
0.9
0.9
0.06
1.1
5.5
Analysis of saaple 41933 by 3CA Corsoration/Technolcgy Division using SC/.1S.
Anal/sis of saapias 41730 s 41931 by Radian Corporation using SC/'.ID.
ag/1 = pea assuming a density zl 1.
9-U
-------
TABLE 5. LI3UID SAMPLE ANALYSIS FRGtt RUNOFF LASGDN *2 AT
TilLSA RECONDITIONING, INCORPORATED IN TULSA, QKUK3HA
Major Compounds
1 ,2,4-Tr iaethylbenzene
1,3,5-Triflethylbenzene
2,4-DiBethylhexane
3-flethyl heptane
3-t1stnylpentane
Acstcne
B-Pinans
C-2-Haxsne
Chiorarora
Cvcicasntans
Ethylbanisns
Isoprspylbenzsna
Liaar.sna
Kethyiene chlarida
M-Batans
N-3utylbanzene
N-Decane
H-Ke?tane
N-Nonans
N-L'ndscane
Kisntr.alene
Styrene
T-Z-Herene
Tetrachicrcithens
Toluene
Trichiorcetnsne
a-£thyitoiiisna
p-Xyiene/'s-Xyiene
TOTAL PARAFFINS
TOTAL DLErlNS
TOTAL ARCSATIC HC
TOTAL KALQGENATE3 HC
TOTAL 31Y6EWTSD HC
TOTAL UNCERTIFIED HC
TOTAL MJS-RErHMIE HC
c
Concentration (ag/l)
a
Analysis 1 Analysis 2a
0.1
0.1
0.3
0.01
0.1 0.1
0.02
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.01
0.2 O.I
0.02
0.1
0.2 0.2
„„_.
0.5 0.7
0.04 0.02
0.3
3.9
9.7 4.4
fa
&2b
0.5
0.9
0.04
0.3
0.01
0.02
0.4
0.4
0.2
1.2
0.02
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.04
0.1
0.3
"if"
0.3
2.2
0.04
15
a
Analysis cf saapla 41535 by BCA Corporation/Tschr.olsqy Division using 3C/;1S.
b
Analysis at saaolss 41936 4 41937 by Radian Corpcraticn using BC/tiD.
m
W
sg/'i = ppa assuming a asnsity of 1.
9-15
-------
TABLE 6. Llfe'IO SAMPLE ANALYSIS PROS THE RUNOFF LASOON 12 AT
TUL3A RECONDITIONING, INCORPORATED IN TULSA, OKLAHOMA
Hajor Csspeunds Concentration (ag/i)
Ethyl bsnzsns
Kethylene chloride
Total Kyisnes
TOTAL AROMATIC HC
TOTAL HALOSENATED HC
TOTAL UNIDENTIFIED HC
TOTAL NOiHIETHftSE HC
19
2
3
22
2
940
960
a
Analysis of saapia 41941 by 5CA Carporation/Technolagy Division using SC/SS.
b
sg/1 = ppi assuaing a density of I.
9-16
-------
TABLE 7. LISuiD SAMPLE ANALYSIS FF.0.1 RUNOFF LAGOON 13 AT
TULSA RECCNDITIGNIN5, INCORPORATED IN TULSA, CKLAHGilA
c
Concentration lsg/'l)
Hajcr Coapouncs
a
Analysis 1
0.01
Analysis 2a
0.03
0.2
0.02
0.03
6* u
0.03
0.1
0.04
0.1
0.1
b
it 2b
0.4
0.03
0.03
0.02
1,1,2-Trichlcrcethane
1,2,4-Triaethylbeazsne
1-Hexene
2,4-3iaethylC8n.tans
Benzene
Butanons
C-2-jctsns
Chlorafora
Cycionexans
H-Butaae
N-Ksxane
N-lindecans
Nechexane
p-«yiane/3-Aylene 0.02
TOTAL PARAFFINS T?~ IT"
TGTAL OLfflNS 0.5
TOTAL AROMATIC KC 0.2 0.02
TOTAL HALCSENATED HC 0.01 0.04
TOTAL QXYSE8A7E3 HC 3.5
TOTAL UHIDEHTIrlES HC 4.3
d
TGTAL NOJHIELrAaE HC 4.3 1C 0.8
•
Analysis or saaoia 4:945 by SCA Ccrporaticn/Tecnnolagy Divisior. using SC.'HS.
b
Analysis of saapiss 41942 i 41943 by Saoian Corporation usi.iq 3C/11D.
c
sg/1 = psa assuming a density ST i.
d
Ccncantration. cf Gsygsratsri .iC not uses in Tstai SSHC cacu,
9-17
-------
TABLE 8. CROSS REFERENCED LIST OF SUBMITTED SAMPLES
COLLECTED AT TRI CONTAINER, CATOOSA, OKLAHOMA.
Sample
Identification
GCA
Control
Remarks
TRI-ROL1-1A
TRI-ROL1-1B
TRI-ROL1-1C
TRI-ROL1-1D
TRI-ROL1-2A
TRI-ROL1-2B
TRI-ROL1-2C
TRI-ROL1-2D
TRI-ROL2-1A
TRI-ROL2-1B
TRI-ROL2-1C
TRI-ROL2-1D
TRI-ROL2-2A
TRI-ROL2-2B
TRI-ROL2-2C
TRI-ROL2-2D
TRI-ROL3-1A
TRI-ROL3-1B
TRI-ROL3-1C
TRI-ROL3-1D
41926*
41927*
41928
41929
41930*
41931*
41932
41933
41934
41935
41936*
41937*
41938*
41939*
41940
41941
41942*
41943*
41944
41945
SAB
SAB
SAB
SAB
SAB
SAB
SAB
SAB
LAB
SAB
SAB
SAB = Small air bubble
LAB = Large air bubble
*Submitted to Radian Corporation, Austin Texas.
9-18
-------
TABLE 9. QUALITY CONTROL DATA FOR ANALYSES CONDUCTED ON THE
SAMPLES COLLECTED AT TRI CONTAINER, CATOOSA, OKLAHOMA:
SURROGATE RECOVERIES - VOLATILE ORGANICS
Sample
Identification
GCA
Control No.
D8-
Toluene
Bromof luorobenzene
DA-1,2-
Dichloroethane
TRI-ROL1-1D 41929 78 96 82
TRI-ROL1-2D 41933 77 84 99
TRI-ROL2-1B 41935 111 122 95
TRI-ROL2-2D 41941 92 136 73
TRI-ROL3-1D 41945 107 117 98
Method Blank 01/11/85 83 90 59
Average Percent Recovery 91 108 84
Relative Standard Deviation (7.) 15 21 16
9-19
-------
APPENDIX A
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION FORMS
A-l
-------
SAIIFU INVENIORV (OR MIMCAH AIRLINES IN IULSA, MINIUM.
FAClim
IDI
B-OMI5MM
ul'fiOIE245t4
DKDf'OIB24SS4
Ci:C(iOIB2«Sk4
CI.K'fltS24344
OIMOIB24544
C \ti*ii
SITE
Aierican Airlinei
Aierican Airlinei
Aierican Airlinei
American Airlinei
Aierican Airlfnei
American Airlinei
Acerican Airlinei
American Ai'linei
American Airlinti
ilyjed
in transit
SOURCE
Aerator/ Separator Tank
Aerator/ Separator Tank
Aerator/ Separator Tank
Aerator/ Separator Tank
Holding Tank
Holding Tani
Holding TanL
Holding T*nk
Holding Tank
SAMPLE
CDMrOJS ID 1
AA-NU-IA
AA-VII-IB
AA-Ntl-IC
AA-NII-ID
AA-VT3-IA
AA-HfS-IB
AA-VT3-IC
AA-KT3-IC
AA-HU-IO
SAilPLE
mi
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
liquid
LAB
CONTROL 1
41877
4I87B
4IB79
4IBBO
4IBBI
41862
4 IBB?
4188!
41684
DATE
SAMPLED
11/29/84
II/29/B4
lt/29/84
11/29/84
11/29/84
11/29/84
11/29/84
11/29/84
11/29/81
SArTLING
CONIRACTOfi
GCA
GCA
GCA
ECA
CCA
GCA
GCA
GCA
6CA
Mil
RECEIVED
12/07/84
12/07/64
II/30/B4
II/30/B4
12/07/84
11/30/84
(1/30/04
11/30/64
11/30/84
OATE
AflA'.mD
IIA
HA
12/11/84
01/09/83
KA
12/12/84
05/13/85
05/21/85
WA.LT
ANALfSIS
CONTRACTOR
RAD
RAD
GCA
GCA
PAD
BCA
GCA
GCA
om
RfFWEO
01/07/33
01/28/65
OI/09i'B5
04/03/85
-------
SAMPLE INVENTORY FOR BKEAT LAKES CONTAINER IN TULSA, OKLAHOMA.
SITE
final liku Drui Ricon.
Great Lakii Drui Ricon.
Gnat Lain Drui Recon.
Ereat Lakei Drui Ricon.
Griit Likii Drui Ricon.
Great liket Drui Recon.
Brut likei Drui Recon.
Sreat Lakei Drui Ricon.
Griit Lakii Drui Ricon.
Griit Lakii Drui Recon,
Griit Like* Drui Ricon.
Gnat Likei Drui Ricon.
Gnat Likii Drui Recon.
Brut Likei Drui Ricon,
Great Lakei Orui Recon.
Great Lakei Drui Recon,
Ereit Lakei Drui Recon.
Brut Likei Drui Ricon,
Griit Likei Drui Recon,
Brut Lakii Drui Ricon.
SOURCE
Riin Runoff float
Rain Runoff Moat
Riin Runoff Moat
Rain Runoff Hoat
Rail Runoff Moat
Rain Runoff Hoat
Riin Runoff Moat
Rain Runoff Moat
Indoor Ciuitic Hath
Indoor Cauitic Nailt
Indoor Ciuitic N»h
Indoor Cauitic Hath
Oil Pit
Oil Pit
Oil Pit
Oil Pit
Drui Pnfluihir
Drui PreHuiher
Drui Prefluther
Drui Prifluihir
COMMENTS
Milky End
Milky End
Milky End
Milky End
Oily End
Oily End
Oily End
Oily End
SAMPLE
ID 1
GI-H-1A
BL-M-il
GL-N-tC
BL-N-1D
GL-N-2A
BL-N-26
BL-M-2C
BL-M-2D
6L-IK-IA
6L-U-II
BL-W-1C
BL-U-1D
BL-OP-IA
BL-OP-18
BL-OP-IC
EL-OP- ID
6L-FH-IA
GL-PM-lt
6L-PN-1C
BL-PN-ID
SAMPLE
TYPE
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
LAB
CONTROL 1
41B90
4IB9I
41892
4IB93
41894
4IB95
41894
41B97
41898
41 899
41900
41901
41902
41903
41904
41905
41904
41907
4I90B
41909
DATE
SAMPLED [
U/2BM
11/2B/B4
11/28/64
II/2B/B4
II/2B/B4
II/2B/B4
11/28/84
11/28/6*
I1/2B/B4
II/28/B4
11/28/84
11/28/84
11/28/84
II/2B/B4
11/28/84
II/2B/B4
11/28/84
11/28/84
11/28/84
11/28/84
SANPLINB
IONTRACTOI
GCA
GCA
GCA
BCA
BCA
GCA
GCA
BCA
GCA
BCA
BCA
BCA
GCA
BCA
BCA
BCA
BCA
ECA
BCA
BCA
DATE
J RECEIVED
12/07/84
12/07/84
11/30/84
11/30/84
12/07/84
12/07/84
11/30/84
11/30/84
11/30/84
11/30/84
12/07/84
12/07/84
12/07/84
12/07/84
11/30/84
II/30/B4
I2/07/B4
12/07/84
11/30/84
11/30/84
DATE 1
ANALV2ED Cl
02/01 /BS
01/31/85
12/12/84
01/11/83
NA
NA
NA
01/15/85
NA
01/15/85
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
01/13/85
NA
NA
OI/OB/B5
01/15/85
MALVSIS
1NTRACTD
RAD
RAD
GCA
GCA
RAD
RAD
GCA
GCA
GCA
GCA
RAO
RAD
RAD
RAD
ECA
FCA
RAD
RAD
GCA
GCA
DATE
IR REPORTED
02/28/85
02/28/85
01/09/85
02/12/85
02/12/85
02/12/85
02/12/85
01/09/85
02/12/85
NA > not anilyxd
-------
SAhTll: INVlNIUIiy 11)11 HlllliNAIIUNAL I'/ll'IK LIIIUANf HI JIULIN, HI.WDII!,').
FSUIIU
III
IBWIZWM
t10K'('712i735
HOMO? 127735
nOt)f7|2S'-J5
MIWI27755
!M\ii'7i:t'3S
RcriJ07i:"35
M0r-Mi;77!5
KtlrJil.WS
^oc-y.'7ir/'-'"'j
BOh'1711^55
MMiyO'lJiV'S
«iit(.07iri''"5
i!CD-jo7i;v;;5
«OC-Vi?irv»T-5
tUif'K.'Un'J
(nwc/ii7"r5
IW07I2??;5
IW07I27735
KUWIWM
SHE
hternational Piper
International Paper
hternattcnil Feper
International Paper
International Faper
International Paper
Internatianal Paper
International Paper
International paper
International Paper
'flterniticnil Faper
International Paper
Internaticnil Paper
International Paper
International Paper
International Piper
International Paper
International Paper
International Paper
International Paper
SOURCE COWEHIS
Hazardous Haiti Pond IS
Hatardoui Haiti Pond IS
Haiardoui Haiti Pond IS
Hazardous Haiti Pond IS
Haiardoui Haiti Pond IS Oil Slick
Haiardoui Haiti Pond IS Oil Slick
Haiardoui Haiti Pond IS Oil Slick
Haiardoui Haiti Pond 15 Oil Slick
Pent* Receiving Pond 14 Near Influent
Pent! Receiving Pond 14 Near Influent
Penta Receiving Pond 14 Near Influent
Penta Receiving Pond 14 Near Influent
Penta Receiving Pond 14
ftfita Receiving Pond 14
Penta Receiving Pond 14
Penta Receiving Pcnd 14
Kistemter Holding Pond
Hastenater Holding Pond
Haitmater Holding Pond
Hastenater Holding Pond
SAMPLE
ID 1
IP-HUP- 1 A
IP-DUMB
IP-HHP-1C
IP-HMP-1D
IP-IIHP-2A
IP-IWC-2B
IP-HHP-2C
IP-HWP-2D
IP-FRF-IA
IP-FRP-IB
1P-IF(P-IC
IP-PRP-ID
IP-PRP-2A
IP-FRP-2B
IP-FBP-2C
IP-FRP-70
IF-k'KRP-IA
IP-HHRP-IB
IP-WRP-IC
IP-HHRP-IO
SAMPLE
TYPE
Liquid
Liquid
liquid
Liquid
Liquid
liquid
Liquid
Liquid
liquid
Liquid
liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
liquid
liquid
Liquid
liquid
liquid
liquid
LAB
CflfUMl 1
41771
41772
41773
41774
41773
Mm
41777
41778
41777
417BM
4I7BI
4I7B2
41783
41784
4I7B5
4I7B&
4I9P7
41788
41789
41750
DATE SAMPLIIIG DAIE
SAMPLED COMRfC'OR RECEIVED
11/30/84
11/30/84
11/30/84
11/50/84
11/10/84
1 1/ JO/84
II/JO/B4
11/30/84
II/30/B4
1 1/W/B4
11/30/84
11/30/84
U/IO/B4
11/30/84
II./IO/B4
11/30/64
11/30/84
11/30/84
1 1/ JO/64
II /JO/34
GCA
GCA
GCA
GCA
GCA
GCA
GCA
GCA
GCA
GCA
GCA
GCA
GCA
GCA
GCA
GCA
C-tA
GCA
GCA
CCA
I7/OI/B4
I7/OI/B4
12/07/84
I2/D7/34
12/07/84
12/07/84
12/01/84
I2/OI/B4
i:/07/B4
12/07/B'
I2/OU84
12/01/34
12(01/84
I2/07/E4
I2/07/B4
12/01/84
I7/07/B4
12/07/84
12/01/84
I7/OI/B4
DAIE ANALVSIS DATE
ANALV7EI) CONTRACTOR REPORTED
OI/OJ/Bi
OI/II/B5
01/31/8!
02/01/95
NA
NA
OI/OJ'B!
OI/U/95
02 '04/85
i'i/Oi'BS
01/03/65
OI/I4/BS
NA
liA
NA
(15/13/85
(i|/:-l/B5
01/30/85
01/03/85
M/M/85
GCA
SCA
RAD
RAD
P.AD
RAD
GCA
ECA
RAD
RAD
GCA
GCA
GCA
RAD
RAD
ECA
RAP
P.AD
E-CA
GCA
OI/07.-B5
02/12/8!
02/iB/B5
<)2/28/aS
01/07/85
02/I2/B5
02> ?6'8!'
0?/iB/95
01/17/85
02/I4/B5
Ok/05/B5
02'2B.'B5
02/7B/95
01/07/85
02/14/85
liA = not analyied
-------
EAHfU INVENIQRV FOR MK Mtlt IN SfklNEflElP, MISSOURI.
Ul
mliilt
III
frJuiO'lDIO* kirr IkEtt
i;ii«i'7i;440t l.irr nut*
hliOoy/IZMifc ktrr rk&it
flM'Oi';i2)4vk Mrr N:C7i;54»l Mrr flcEtt
hk>i'iO?liS|i)k Mrr hctii
iUv«'ili>4iio Mrr McCtl
tiuOi'u7lii4vD Mrr HiE«
HujtO'l2i4*'fc ktrr flvfitt
liCiw7u(4ui Mrr Nc6«t
NJiiijMJvWi ktrr he on
ltb[ii")i:i(io Mrr lk(t>
(1i'U'u7l2i4>>» ktrr Itu'H
I.Ct.'jll.>l..c ktrr N;DII
ML'.\i.'Ki40t ktrr lu£«
Huavo7IIt40i lirr lliEti
«utt'\l>l2i4o» Mrr HcEx
hi'l>.'u)l2i40t Urr IkEtt
«;i,i»)7l2*40» kirr Nc6tt
rlu[>^7liv40a Mrr lUSui
Itfc>u"o7lii4v6 ktrr rUott
Hi'tiw/l2i4>Ji Mrr HCDII
nulu07l2*4i'« ktrr It: tin
H.-M.mid'i Mrr Mil
iCWIUMot Mrr KEit
SHE
ilioii iriit»nl
KJCJ IrtiUtnt
*uiid Irtittent
Ul-Oj lltlUiu
tJtnl lleiUrn
Uocd IrtiUrn
Uiijj lmli«ii
Uuod Irtilitr.
hood Iiiillin
kuod Iriititiit
Hjjd liiiljenl
Ubol lr*iti*nt
Uood Irtiljtiit
Uot'd IrtiUint
iila) liijht.it
taut IftiluMt
tiiod Itrilienl
y^C'J l«it>tiit
JjoJ Irtilitnl
•oad UnlH.it
JjoJ Iruliifit
Hood IrtiUiflt
kujj Irtaliiiit
doud Iriilitnt
•oad IrtiUint
Hood Irfiitinl
kood Initial
•3od Iriiutnt
SOURCE [01HEN1S
Fom II
ftnd II
lonj II
lo.iJ II
rond II
foiid II
fond II
rond II
kmoll Collictlm link
tjnoK Colltclion link
fcjuoll Colltctioi link
Runoil Colltttion link
Runoff Colltction link
(unmi Collittion link
kj«oll Culliction link
Runoil tolltction link
Mltnlion link
(tttaliua link
Rttfntion link
Riti.ttioi link
Stpiritar Oil Click
StpiriUr ' Oil Slick
iipir.tor Oil Slick
Stpirilar Oil Slick
S«|iiritor
Stpirilor
Stpiritor
iipjrilcr
SAHILE
It 1
KB-PI-IA
KN-H-li
m-pi-ic
kn-pi-io
kB-PI-iA
kN-Pl-26
HN-PI-2C
Mt-H-21
kn-tr-IA
kN-RP-16
•K-RP-IC
kD-iiP-ID
kn-flp-2A
kH-RP-21
kK-KP-IC
krt-KI-il)
KK-RI-IA
kN-RI-18
M-dl-IC
I.H-R1-10
KN-SI-IA
k'N-SI-lt
kn-si-ir.
KH-II-ID
kn-si-1'A
f«-S[-2B
UN-SI -2C
k-N-81-21
SANrlt
Uff
liquid
Liquid
liquid
Liquid
liquid
Liquid
liquid
Liquid
liquid
liquid
liquid
Liquid
Liquid
liquid
Liquid
liquid
Liquid
liquid
Liquid
liquid
liquid
Liquid
liquid
liquid
liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
CCH.UC.L 1
4H?3
41*94
4H95
4 mi
4m;
4IVSB
4I««>
42000
42001
42002
42003
42004
42005
42041
4'2007
42008
4200t
42010
42011
• 42012
42013
42014
42015
42011
42017
42018
4201)
12020
DAIE SSNHING llAlE
SANrtEO CQNIUCIOR RECEIVED
11/30/84
11/30/64
11/30/64
11/30/64
11/30/84
11/20/64
11/30/64
It/30/64
11/30/64
11/30/64
11/30/64
11/30/64
11/30/64
11/30/64
11/30/64
11/30/84
11/30/64
11/30/64
11/30/84
11/30/84
11/30/64
11/30/84
11/30/64
11/30/64
11/30/64
11/30/64
11/30/64
11/30/84
ECA
ECA
ECA
ECA
ECA
ECA
ECA
ECA
ECA
ECA
CCA
ECA
ECA
ECA
ECA
ECA
ECA
ECA
ECA
ECA
ECA
ECA
ECA
ECA
ECA
ECA
ECA
ECA
12/07/64
12/07/14
12/01/64
12/01/64
12/07/64
!2/OI/«4
I2/UI/B4
12/07/84
12/07/64
12/07/64
12/01/84
12/01/14
12/07/64
12(07/84
12/01/64
12/01/84
12/07/64
12/01/84
12/01/64
12/07/84
12/01/64
12/01/64
12/07/84
12/07/84
12/01/64
12/01/64
12/07/64
12/07/84
DAIE ANALiSIS DnlE
MALIUD CONTRACTOR (HCflEll
02/OJ/65
01/30/63
01/06/85
01/14/65
01/11/65
01/06/85
01/14/63
02/01/65
(2/01/65
NA
01/06/85
01/14/65
NA
NA
01/08/65
01/14/65
NA
01/06/65
01/14/65
NA
01/08/65
01/14/65
NA
NA
01/06/65
OI/I5/8S
NA
NA
RAD
SAO
ECA
ECA
M
ECA
ECA
RAO
RAO
RhO
ECA
ECA
RAO
KAD
ECA
ECA
RAO
ECA
CCA
RAD
OCA
ECA
RAO
RAD
ECA
ECA
RAD
RAD
02/26/65
02/2E/65
OIM/i5
02/14/93
l/Vli/tl
OI/Ot/85
02/14/it
01/IS/cS
03/15/Si
Ol/H/65
02/14/65
OI/dt/63
U//I4/01.
Ol/0?/b5
02/14/63
OI/M«;Bi
02/14/63
01/04/85
02/l2/e:i
liii • not ifiilytld
-------
SAHPLE INVENTORY FOR MCDONNELL DOUGLAS IN TULSA, OKLAHOMA.
FACILITY
1DI
CKD04130I347
CKD04IIOI347
OKD04I30I347
DW4I50I347
NcDoniull
HcDannill
HcOonn»ll
HcDonnill
SITE
Douglit
Douglit
Douglii
Dougla
SOURCE
CUrillif
CUrUlir
Clirlldr
CUriUir
SAHPLE
COHHENTE ID 1
KD-C-IA
HD-C-1B
MD-C-1C
MO-C-1D .
SAHPLE
TYPE
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
LAB
CONTROL 1
41883
41661
41887
41888
DATE
SAMPLED
11/29/84
11/29/84
11/29/84
11/29/84
EAHPL1N6
CONTRACTOR
GCA
BCA
GCA
6CA
DATE
RECEIVED
12/07/84
12/07/84
11/30/84
11/30/84
DATE
ANALYZED
01/31/ES
01/31/65
12/12/84
01/10/83
ANALYSIS DATE
CONTRACTOR REPORTED
RAD 02/28/83
RAD 02/28/B5
GCA 01/09/83
GCA 01/28/85
-------
BAHPLE INVENTORY FDR TULSA RECONDITIONING, INCORPROATED IN TUISA, OKLAHOMA.
SUE
Tulii Ktcoadltlong Inc.
lulu Rcconditlong Inc.
Tulil Riconditiong lie.
lulu Rtconditiong Inc.
lulu Ktconditiong lie.
Tulfi Rtconditiong Int.
Tulii Rtconditioag Inc.
Tulii Rcconditiong Inc.
Tulii fticonditiong Inc.
Tulfi Riconditlong tic.
Tulii Riconditiong lie.
Tulii Rccandltiong Inc.
Tulii Recandltlang Inc.
Tulii Ricondlllong Inc.
Tulii Ricondltlang Inc.
Tulii RfconditUng Inc.
Tulii fciconditiang Inc.
Tulii ttconditlang Inc.
Tulil Riconditiong Inc.
Tulii Riconditlong Inc.
SOI
Runoff Li goon
Runoff Ligoon
Runoff Ligoon
Runoff Ligoon
Runoff ligoon
Runoff Ligoon
Runoff Ligoon
Runoff Ligoon
Runoff lijoon
Runoff Ligoon
Runcff ligoon
Runoff Ligoon
Runoff Ligoon
Runoff ligaon
Runoff Ligoon
Runoff ligoon
Runoff ligoon
Runoff ligoon
Runolf Ligoon
Runoff Ligoon
URCE
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
II
13
13
1]
GAKPLE
CONNENTI ID 1
TRI-ROIMA
TRI-RDLI-II
TRI-ROLt-IC
TRI-ROLI-ID
TRI-ROLI-2A
IRI-ROLI-21
TRI-ROLI-2C
TRI-RDLI-20
TRI-ROL2-IA
TRI-ROL2-II
TRI-ROL2-IC
TRI-ROL2-1D
TRI-ROL2-2A
TRI-ROL2-2I
TRI-ROL2-2C
IRI-RDL2-2D
TRI-ROL1-IA
TRI-ROLI-ID
TRI-ROL3-IC
TRI-ROLWD
SAMPLE
TYPE
liquid
Liquid
liquid
Liquid
liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
liquid
Liquid
liquid
liquid
Liquid
Liquid
liquid
liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
liquid
LAI
CONTKOL 1
41924
Of 27
41928
41929
41930
41911
41912
41911
41914
41935
41934
41917
41916
41919
41910
41941
41942
II94I
41944
41945
DATE
SANPLED C
11/28/84
II/2B/84
11/28/64
11/28/84
11/28/84
11/28/04
11/28/84
II/2B/84
II/2D/BI
II/2B/84
II/2B/B4
11/28/84
11/28/84
11/28/84
11/28/84
11/28/84
11/28/84
11/28/84
11/28/84
11/28/84
SAHPLINB
IONIRACTOI
GCA
6CA
6CA
8CA
BCA
6CA
GCA
ECA
GCA
GCA
GCA
GCA
GCA
BCA
GCA
GCA
GCA
BCA
GCA
GCA
DATE
II RECEIVED
12/07/84
I2/07/B4
11/10/84
11/30/84
12/07/84
12/07/84
11/10/64
11/10/84
II/10/B4
11/10/84
12/07/84
12/07/84
12/07/84
12/07/84
11/10/84
II/10/B4
12/07/84
12/07/84
11/10/84
11/30/84
DATE 1
ANALV1EI Cl
NA
NA
NA
02/I4/B3
02/01/85
01/10/85
12/11/84
01/11/85
12/11/84
01/11/85
02/04/B5
02/04/B5
NA
NA
NA
02/14/8)
01/10/85
02/01/85
12/13/84
01/11/85
IKALVSli
DNTRACTC
RAD
RAD
GCA
GCA
RAD
RAD
ECA
GCA
ECA
GCA
RAD
RAD
RAD
RAD
GCA
RAD
RAD
GCA
GCA
! DATE
IR REPORTED
01/28/85
02/2B/B5
02/28/85
OI/09/B5
02/12/85
OI/09/B5
02/12/85
02/28/BS
02/2B/B5
01/28/65
02/28/85
02/28/85
OI/09/B5
02/12/85
NA « not inilyiid
-------
APPENDIX B
GCA DATA REPORT FORMS
B-l
-------
Project 1-628-037
GCA Control No.
418SO
DATA REPORT SHEET: TSDF
Volatile Organic Compounds
Sample Identification AA-WT1-1D
Analysis Date 1/9/85
Sample Matrix Water
Instrument and Sample Volume*
HP 5935 GC/MS 1:10,000 PT
Finnigan OWA GCAMS__
PE 3920 GC/FTD
HP 5890 GC/FID
Compound
Acetone
Acetonitrile
Allvl Alcohol
Aniline
Benzene
Bis (chlorome thy 1) ether
Bronodichloromethane
Bromoform
Bromomethane
Carbon disulfide
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
2-Chioroethyl vinyl ether
Chloroform
Chloromethane
C is-1 ,3-Dichloropror>ene
Cvclohexane
Cyc lohexanone
Dibromochlorome thane
1 ,2-Dibromoethane
D ic h lorod if luo rcine thane
1 , l-Dichoroethane
1,2-Dichloroethylene
1 . 1-Dichloroethvlene
1 , 2-Dichloropropane
Diethvl ether
Ethyl acetate
Ethvl acrvlate
Ethylene
Concentration
(mg/l)
290.00
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND*
ND
ND*
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
__ ND
Compound
Ethylene chloride
Ethylene dibromide
Ethylene dichloride
Furfural
Isobutyl alcohol
Methyl acetate
Methyl alcohol
Methyl chloride
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methvl isobutyl kntone
Methyl methacrylate
Methvlene chloride
n-Butvl alcohol
n-Propyl benzene
Styrene
1 , 1 ,2 ,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethylene
Tetrahydro f uran
Toluene
Trans 1,3-Dichloropropene
1,1. 1-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethvlene
Trichlorofluorome thane
1, 1,2-Trichioro-
-1.2, 2-Trif luo rone thans
Trif lu-nroethana
Vinvl chloride
Xylenes
Concentration
(mg/D
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NL
ND*
ND
160.00
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
200.00
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND*
ND
*PT = Purge and Trap
DI = Direct Injection
US = Headspace
ND = < 100 ms/1
ND* = < 200 mg/1
GCA TECHNOLOGY DIVISION
B-2
-------
T-62S-037
Ci:A Control No.
41330
DATA REPORT SHEETS
Purgea'cles
Sample I.D.
Analysis Date
Sample Matrix Water Instrument K? 5935 GC/MS Sample Dilution 1:10,000 ?T
Parameter
Chloromethsne
Eromoicethane
Vinvl chloride^
Chloroethar.e
Mechylene chloride
Acetone
Carbon disulfids
1 , 1-Dichloroethene
1 . 1-Dichloroethane
Trans-1 ,2-dichloroethene
Chloroform
2-Butanone
lj 1 , 1-Tr ichlcroffthane
Carbon tetrachloride
Ercmod ichloroaethane
Total xvlsnes
Concentration
(US/1)
NO*
ND
NO*
ND
ND**
ND**
ND
NO
ND
NO'
\:B
ND
200000
1 ND
ND
ND
Parameter
1,1,2,,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,2-Dichloropropane
Trans-1 »3-DichloroproDene
Trichloroethen?
Dibromochlorome thane
Benzene
cis-1 ,,3-DichloroDrooene
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
Broraofonn " •
r4-HethYl-2-pentanone
Tetrachloroethene
[Toluene _ . . .
Chlorob?nzene
Ethylbenzene
Stvrene , ^
Concentration
(•^g/1)
ND
Nfi
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND*
ND
ND*
i ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
PT » Purge and Trap
DI = Direct Injection
ND = < 1 x 105 yg/1
ND* - < 2 x 1Q5 ug/1
ug/1 = ppb (for density of water » 1)
K = Quantitaticn below detection limit
ND*« = Blank contamination was obseri/ed for this compound.
B-3
'm^ ^tf A^«^
GCA
CCA CCR
Technology Division
-------
1-623-037
CCA Control Ho. 41880_
DATA REPORT SHEET
Qualitative Compounds*
Sample I.D. _ AA-WT1-1D
Analysis Date 1/9/85
Sample Matrix 'Water ; Instrument HP 5985 CO/MS. Sample Dilution 1:10.000 PT
Parameter ."
.i
"Allvl Alcohol
Bisichloroinathyl) ether
Cyclohexar.e
Cvclohexanone
1 ,2-Dibrotno ethane
Di-hlcrod if luorome thane
Diethvl ether
E^hvl acetate
Ethyl acr^lats
Concentration
<4g/l)
NA
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NA •>
Parameter
Furfural
Isobutyl alcohol
..Methyl., acetate.. ._
Methyl alcohol
Methyl methacrylate
n-Butyl glcohol
n-Propyl benzene
Tetrahydrofuran
Trichlorofluorone thane
1.1.2-Trichloro-
1,2,2-trifluoroethane
Trifluprgethane
Concentration
(ug/D
ND
NA
ND
NA
ND
NA
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
^Concentration based on a comparison of the total ion area of the compound with
that of the internal standard.
•*.-•"
NA « Not analyzed "by purge and trap
PT - Purge and Trap
DI - Direct Injection
1ID « < 1 x 10 yg/1
ug/1 « ppfa (for density of water = 1)
| g\ A GCA CORPCRATICM
B-4
GCA
Technology Division
-------
Project 1-628-037
GCA Control No. 41883
DATA REPORT SHEET
Additional Compounds
Sample I.D.
AA-WT3-1C
Analysis Date 5/13/85
Sample Matrix PEG
Instrument HP5985 GC/MS
Sample Dilution 1:500
\* • f\ • *3 t
Number
75-05-8
107-18-6
542-88-1
110-82-7
108-94-1
106-93-4
75-71-8
60-29-7
141-78-6
140-88-5
Parameter
Acetonitrile
Allyl Alcohol
Bis ( chloromethyl )ether
Cyclohexane
Cyclohexanone
1 , 2-Dibromoethane
Dichlorodif luorome thane
Diethyl ether
Ethyl acetate
Ethyl acrylate
Concentration
(ug/1)
ND
NA
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NA
V* • t\ m O 9
Number
98-01-1
78-83-1
79-20-9
67-56-1
79-41-4
71-36-3
103-65-1
109-99-9
75-69-4
76-13-1
420-26-2
Parameter
Furfural
Isobutyl alcohol
Methyl acetate
Methyl alcohol
Methyl methacrylate
n-Butyl alcohol
n-Propyl benzene
Tetrahydrof uran
Trichlorof luorome thane
1,1,2-Trichloro-
1,2, 2-trif luoroethane
1,1, 1-Trif luoroethane
Concentration
(ug/1)
ND
NA
ND
ND
ND
NA
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Concentrations based on a comparison of the total ion area of the compound with that of the internal
standard.
PT = Purge and Trap
DI = Direct Injection
ND = <2500 ug/1
NA = Not analyzed by Purge and Trap
K = Quantitation below detection limit
ug/1 = ppb (for density of water)
Also tentatively identified in this sample were Isomers of other alteyl benzenes, and one dichlorobenzene isomer.
©©A
GCA
GCA
Technology Division
-------
Project 1-628-037
GCA Control Mo. 41883
DATA REPORT SHEET
Purgeables
Sample I.D. AA-WT3-1C
Analysis Date 5-13"85
Sample Matrix PEG
Instrument HP5985 GC/MS
Sample Dilution 1;500
w • f\ * O •
Number
74-87-3
74-83-9
75-01-4
75-00-3
7 75-09-2
^ 67-64-1
75-15-0
75-35-4
75-34-3
156-60-5
67-66-3
"7 Q_Q "5 — 1
/ o y j j
71-55-6
56-23-5
75-27-4
*
Parameter
Chloromethane
Bromomethane
Vinyl Chloride
Chloroethane
Methylene Chloride
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
1 , 1-Dichloroethylene
1 , 1-Dichloroethane
Trans-1 , 2-dichloroethylene
Chloroform
2«.nnt-=ivi/-irt£* /K1W\
— uucanone IMCJKJ
1,1, 1-Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Bromodi chloromethane
Total xylenes
Concentration
(ug/1)
ND*
ND
ND*
ND
ND
1000k
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Kin
200,000
ND
ND
33,000
C.A.S.
Number
79-34-5
78-87-5
10061-2-6
79-01-6
124-48-1
71-43-2
10061-01-5
110-75-8
75-25-2
108-10-1
127-18-4
1 flfl — RR — "^
J.UCJ o O j
108-90-7
100-41-4
100-42-5
Parameter
1,1,2, 2-Tetrachloroethane
1 , 2-Dichloropropane
Trans-1 , 3-dichloropropylene
Trichloroethylene
Dibromechlorome thane
Benzene
cis-1, 3-Dichloropropylene
2-ChloroethylvinYlether
Bromoform
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
Tetrachloroethylene
i o j. u e n e
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
Styrene
Concentratio
(ug/1)
ND
ND
ND
1100k
ND
ND
ND
ND*
ND
ND*
'/0,000
~ 11,000
ND
9400
ND
PT = Purge and Trap
DI = Direct Injection
ug/1 = ppb (for density of water)
*C.A.S. Numbers for xylene isomers are as follows
k = present1 but beneath detection limits
ND = <2500 ug/1
ND* = <5000 ug/1
K = Quantitation below detection limit
ortho- 95-47-6, meta- 108-38-3, para- 106-42-3.
GCA
GOA c
Technology Divisioi
-------
Project 1-628-037
GCA Control No. 41883 duP-
DATA REPORT SHEET
Purgeables
Sample I. D. AA-WT3-IC- dup.
Analysis Date_
5-21-85
Sample Matrix
Instrument HP5985 GC/MS
Sample Dilution l;500
C.A.S.
Number
74-87-3
74-83-9
75-01-4
75-00-3
T 75-09-2
"" 67-64-1
75-15-0
75-35-4
75-34-3
156-60-5
67-66-3
78-93-3
71-55-6
56-23-5
75-27-4
*
Parameter
Chloromethane
Bromome thane
Vinyl Chloride
Chloroethane
Methylene Chloride
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
1, 1-Dichloroethvlene
1 tl-Dichloroethane
Trans-1 , 2-dichloroethylene
Chloroform
2-Butanone (MEK)
1,1, 1-Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Bromodi chloromethane
Total xylenes
Concentration
(ug/1)
ND*
ND
ND*
ND
69&0
11000
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
270,000
ND
ND
120,000
C.A.S.
Number
79-34-5
78-87-5
10061-2-6
79-01-6
124-48-1
71-43-2
10061-01-5
110-75-8
75-25-2
108-10-1
127-18-4
108-88-3
108-90-7
100-41-4
100-42-5
Parameter
1 , 1 , 2 f 2-Tetrachloroethane
1 , 2-Dichloropropane
Trans-1, 3-dichloropropylene
Trichloroethylene
Dibromechlorome thane
Benzene
cis-1, 3-Dichloropropylene
2-Chloroethvlvinylether
Bromof orm
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
Tetrachloroethylene
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
Styrene
Concentratio
(ug/1)
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND*
ND
ND*
lOO.OOO:
18,000
ND
28,000
ND
PT = Purge and Trap
DI = Direct Injection
ug/1 = ppb (for density of water)
*C.A.S. Numbers for xylene isomers are as follows
ND =
-------
Project 1-628-037
GCA Control No. 41883 dup.
DATA REPORT SHEET
Additional Compounds
Sample I.D. AA-HT3-1C dup.
Sample Matrix PEG
Instrument HP5985 GC/MS
Analysis Date 5-21-85
Sample Dilution 1:500
V* • f\ • O •
Number
75-05-8
107-18-6
542-88-1
110-82-7
108-94-1
106-93-4
75-71-8
60-29-7
141-78-6
140-88-5
Parameter
Acetonitrile
Allyl Alcohol
Bis ( chloromethvl ) ether
Cyclohexane
Cyclohexanone
1 , 2-Dibromoethane
Dichlorodif luorome thane
Diethyl ether
Ethyl acetate
Ethyl acrylate
Concentration
(ug/1)
ND
NA
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO-
NA
\«* • A • D •
Number
98-01-1
78-83-1
79-20-9
67-56-1
79-41-4
71-36-3
103-65-1
109-99-9
75-69-4
76-13-1
420-26-2
Parameter
Furfural
Isobutyl alcohol
Methyl acetate
Methyl alcohol
Methyl methacrylate
n-Butyl alcohol
n-Propyl benzene
Tetrahydrofuran
Trichlorof luorome thane
1,1, 2-Trichloro-
1,2, 2-trif luoroethane
1,1, 1-Trif luoroethane
Concentration
(ug/1)
ND
NA
ND
NA
ND
NA
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Concentrations based on a comparison of the total ion area of the compound with that of the internal
standard.
PT = Purge and Trap
DI = Direct Injection
ug/1 = ppb (for density of water)
ND = < 600 ug/1
NA = Not analyzed by Purge and Trap
K = Quantitation below detection limit
Also tentatively identified in this sample was one dichlorobenzene isomer.
GCA
GCA CORPORA'-."':
Technology Division
-------
Project
1-623-037
GCA. Control No.
41893
DATA REPORT SHEETS
Purgeables
Sample I.D. GL-M-lD Analysis Date 1/1
Sample Matrix Water Instrument HP 5985 .GC/MS Sample Dilution 1;5 PT
Parameter
Chlorome thane
Bromomethane
Vinyl chloride
Chloroethane
Methylene chloride _ _
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
Ijl-Dichloroethene
1 , 1-Dichloroethane
Trans-1 ,2-dichloroethene
Chloroform . _
2-Butanone
1,1, 1-Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Bromodichloromethane
Total xylenes
Concentration
(ug/1)
ND*
ND
ND*
ND
225*
557*
ND
ND
ND
ND'
ND
ND
1 ND
ND
ND
ND
Parameter
1,1,,2,,2-Tetrachloroethane
1 , 2-Dichloropropane
^Trans-1 i3-Dichloropropene
Trichloroethene
Dibroraochlorome thane
Benzene
cis-1.3-Dichloropropene
2-Chloroethvl vinyl ether
Bromoform
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
Stvrene
Concentration
(ug/1)
ND
Nfl
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND*
ND
ND*
ND
41K
ND
35K
ND
PT » Purge and Trap
DI = Direct Injection
ND = < 50 ug/1
ND* = <100 ug/1
ug/1 = ppb (for density of water = 1)
K = Quantitation below detection limit
*Corrected for blank values.
B-9
©A
GCA
GCA CORPORA ncn
Technology Division
-------
Project
1-628-037
GCA Control No.
Sample I.D.
GL-M-lD
DATA REPORT SHEET
Qualitative Compounds*
_^_______ Analysis Date
1/11/85
Sample Matrix Water Instrument HP 5985 GC/MS_ Sample Dilution
PT
Parameter
Alivl Alcohol
Bis^chloromethyDether
Cyclohexane
Cyclohexanone
1,,2-DibrgmQ ethane
Dichlorpdif luoromethane
Diethyl ether
Ethyl acetate_
Ethyl acrylate
Concentration
(yg/1)
NA
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NA
•
Parameter
Furfural
IsobutYl_.aZcohol
Methyl acetate
Methvl alcohol
Methyl methacrylate
n-Butvl_alcohol
n-Propyl benzene
Tetrahydrofuran ^
Trichlorofluorooethane
1,1,2-Trichlqro-
l ,2 ,2-trif luoroethane _.
Trifluorqethane
Concentration
(ug/1)
ND
NA
ND
NA ..
ND
NA
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
^Concentration based on a comparison of the total ion area of the compound with
that of the internal standard.
NA = Not analyzed-by purge and trap
PT * Purge and Trap
DI * Direct Injection
ND » < 50 ug/1
ug/1 = ppb (for density of water - 1)
B-10
GCA
GCA CCFFCRATIGN
Technology Division
-------
Project
1-623-037
CCA Control No. 41897
DATA REPOKT SHEETS
Purgeables
Sample I.D. _ GL-M-2D
Analysis Date A/15/85, .
Sample Matrix Oil (PEG Instrument HP 5985 GC/MS Sample Dilution 1:50Q PT
Parameter
Chloromethane
Bromome thane
Vinyl chloride
Chloroethane
Methylene chloride
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
1 , 1-Dichloroethene
1 . l-Dichloroethane
Trans- 1^2-dichloroethene
Chloroform ._ _ __
2-Butanone _ _ _ .
1,1, 1-Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Broraod ich lo rome t hane
Total xvlenes
Concentration
(Ug/l)
ND*
ND
ND*
ND
10250*
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND-'
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Parameter
1.1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
I ,2-Dichloroprooano
Trans-1 ,3-Dichloroorop«?ne
[Trichloroathene
Dibromochlorosie thane
Benzene
cis-ljS-Dichloronroper.e
2-Chloroethvl vinvl ether
Bromofonn
4-Methvl-2-pentanone
Tetrachloroethens
Toluene
Chloro benzene
Ethvlbenzene
Stvrene
Concentration
(~g/D
ND
NTJ
ND
ND
ND
So
ND
ND*
ND
MD*
N'D
HD
N'D
ND
ND
PT = Purge and Trap
DI » Direct Injection
ND = < 5000 ug/1
ND* = < 10000 ug/1
ug/1 = ppb (for density of water = 1)
K = Ouantitation below detection limit
* = corrected for blank value
B-ll
A
c,c.,\ cofiP-'F
Tochnolcgy Division
-------
Project
1-628-037
GCA Control. No. 41397
DATA REPORT SHEET
Qualitative Compounds*
Sample I.D. GL-M-2D
Analysis Date 1/15/85
Sample Matrix Oil (PEG) Instrument HP 5985 GC/MS Sample Dilution 1:5QO PT
Parameter
Allvl Alcohol .
Bis (chloromethyl) ether
Cyclohexane
Cvc lohexanbne
1^2-Dibromoethane
P ichlorod if luorome thane
Diethvl ether
Ethyl acetate
Ethvl acrvlate
Concentration
(ug/1)
NA
ND
ND
NA
ND
ND
ND
ND
NA . J
Parameter
Furfural
Isobutyl alcohol
Methyl acetate
Methyl alcohol
Methyl methacrylate
. n-Butyl alcohol
n-Prooyl benzene
Tetrahydrofuran ..
Tricblorofluoromethane .
1,1.2-Trichloro-
1,2,2-trifluoroethane
Trifluoroethane
Concentration
(ug/1)
ND
M.
ND
NA
ND
NA
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
^Concentration based on a comparison of the total ion area of the compound with
that of the internal standard.
NA B Not analyzed by purge and trap
PT « Purge and Trap
DI = Direct Injection
ND » < 5000 ug/1
ug/1 = ppb (for density of water = 1)
B-12
GCA
GC
Technology Division
-------
Project
1-628-037
CCA Control No. 41899
DATA REPORT SliKETS
Purgeables
Sample I.D. .JfiriHrUl Analysis Date _i/i;j/85
Sample Matrix _Oil_(P_EfInstrument H? 5985.GC/MS Sample Dilution 1:50°
Parameter
ChlqrQmethnne
Bromomethane
Vinyl chloride
Chloroethane
Methvlene chloride
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
1 , 1-Dichloroethene
1.1-Diqhloroethane
Trans-1 ,2-dichloroethene
Chloroform
2-Butar.one
1 , 1 , 1-Tr ichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Bromcdichloroiae thane
Total xvlenes
Concentration
(us/1)
ND*
ND
ND*
ND
89850*
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO'-
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
. Parameter
1 , 1 ^^-T^tr.ichloroo^hnne
1 ,2-Dichloropropane
.Trans-1 ,3-Dichloropropene
Trichloroethene
Dibromochlorome thane
Benzene
cis-iiS-Dichloroprooene
2-Chloroethvl vinvl ether
Bromoform
4-Meth^fl-2-pentanone
T^trachloroethene
[Toluene _ __
Chlornbenzene
EthYlbenr.Gue
Stvrene
Concentration
(Pg/l)
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
' " ND
ND
ND*
ND
ND*
NU
ND
ND
KQ
:n)
PT « Purge and Trap
DI = Direct Injection
ND - < 5000 yg/1
ND* - < 10000 ug/1
ug/1 = ppb (for density of water = 1)
K = Quantitation below detection limit
* = corrected for blank value
B-13
Technology Division
-------
Project
1-628-037
GCA Control No. A1S99
DATA REPORT SHEET
Qualitative Compounds*
Sample I.D. _ GL-lW-1B
Analysis Date 1/15/85
Sample Matrix Oil (PEG) Instrument HP 5985 GC/MS Sample Dilution 1:5QO PT
Parameter
Allvl Alcohol
Bis(chloromethyl)ether
Cyclohexane
Cyclohexanone
1,2-Dibromoethane . .
D ichlorod if luorome thane
Diethyl_ether
Ethvl acetate
Ethvl acrylate
Concentration
(ug/1)
NA
ND
ND
NA
ND
ND
ND
ND
NA..
Parameter
Furfural
Isobutyl alcohol
Methyl acetate_ _ .... __
Methyl alcohol
Methvl methacrylate
n-Butyl alcohol . .. ..,_
n-Propyl benzene
Tetrahydrofuran
Trichlorof luoromethane
Ll,1.2-Trichloro-
1.2.2-trifluoroethane
Trifluoroethane
Concentration
(ug/1)
ND
YA
ND
NA
ND
NA
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
^Concentration based on a comparison of the total ion area of the compound with
that of the internal standard.
NA * Not analyzed by purge and trap
PT = Purge and Trap
DI • Direct Injection
ND
< 5000 ixg/1
ug/1 = ppb (for density of water = 1)
B-14
GCA
GCA CORPORATION
Technology Division
-------
Project
1-628-037
GCA Control No. A1905
DATA REPORT SIIKETS
Purgeables
Sanple I.D. ___GLQP-1D.
Analysis Date ^^J^/15/85
Sample Matrix , Oil (PEG)lnstrumcnt _HP_5985 ,GC/MS Sample Dilution 1:500 PT
Parameter
Chloromethane
Bromomethane
Yinyl chloride
Chloroethane
Methylene chloride
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
1 , 1-Dichloroethene
1 , 1-Dichloroethane
Trans-l,2-dichloroethene
Chloroform
2-Butanone
1,1, 1-Trichlorof thane
Carbon tetrachloride
Bromodichlorome thane
Total xvlenes
Concentration
(Pg/l)
NI)A
ND
ND*
ND
34600*
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND'
ND
ND
50QQQ
ND
ND
ND
Parameter
1, I ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1 ,2-Dichloropropane
Trans-1 ,3-Dichloropropene
Trichloroethene
Dibroraochlorome thane
Benzene
cis-l,3-Dichloropropene
2-Chloroethvl vinvl ether
Bromofonn
A-Methvl-2-pentanonc
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
Stvrene
Concentration
(ug/1)
' ND
ND
L ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND*
ND
ND*
ND
35000
ND
ND
ND
PT * Purge and Trap
DI = Direct Injection
ND = < 5000 wg/1
ND* = < 10000 pg/1
ug/1 = ppb (for density of water = 1)
K = Quantitation below detection limit
* « corrected for blank value
B-15
' » ~*^r mm^f^
GGA
GCA CORPORA riGN
Technology Division
-------
Project
1-628-037
GCA Control No61905
DATA REPORT SHEET
Qualitative Compounds*
Sample I.D. _.. GLOP-1D
Analysis Date 1/15/85
Sample Matrix Oil (PEG) Instrument HP 5985 GC/MS Sample Dilution 1:50°
Parameter
Alivl Alcohol
B is (chloromethyl) ether
Cyclohexane
Cyc lohexanone
lJ12-DibronQe£haneT
Dich lorod if luorome thane
Diethvl ether
Ethyln acetate
Ethyl acrylafie
Concentration
(Ug/1)
NA
ND
ND
NA
ND
ND
ND
ND
NA.
Parameter
Furfural _._, _ _
Isobutyl alcohol
Methyl acetate
Methyl alcohol
Methyl^methacrvlate
n-Butyl alcohol
n-Propyl benzene
_ Tetrahydrofuran .
Trichlorofluoromethane
1.1.2-Trichloro-
1,,2,,2-trifluorQethane
TrifluQroethane
Concentration
(ug/1)
ND
NA
ND
NA
ND
NA
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
^Concentration based on a comparison of the total ion area of the compound with
that of the internal standard.
NA » Not analyzed by purge and trap
PT « Purge and Trap
DI = Direct Injection
ND
< 5000 ug/1
ug/1 - ppb (for density of water = 1)
B-16
GCA
GCA COFFCPATICN
Technology Division
-------
Project
1-628-037
CCA Control No. 41909
DATA REPORT SHEETS
Purgeabies
Sample I.D. _GLPW-ID
Sample Matrix Liquid
Analysis Date .l/15/85_
Instrument KP 5985 GC/MS Sample Dilution 1:1000 PT
Parameter
Chloromethane
Bromomethane
Vinvl chloride .
Chloroethane
Methvlene chloride
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
1 . 1-Dichloroethene
Concentration
(ug/1)
ND*
ND
ND*
ND
ND**
ND
ND
ND
Parameter
1 , 1 , 2, 2-Tct rach loro'j t hane
1 ,2-Dichlorooropane
Trans-1 ,3-Dichloroorooene
Trich loroe thene
Dibromcchlororae thane
Benzene
cis-l,3-Dichloro0ropene
2-Chloroethyl vinv.l ether
Concentration
(i-g/1)
ND
' ""'ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND*
I
1
f,
P
1.1-Dichloroethane
ND
Bromoform
ND
Trans- 1 „ 2-d ich loroe thene
Chloroform
2-Butanone
1 , 1^ 1-Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Bromodichloromethane
Total xylenes
ND'
ND
ND
ND
•ID
ND
ND
4-Methvl-2-pentanone
Tetrach loroe thene
Toluene
Chlorob§nzene
Ethvlbeczene »
Styrene t
ND* i
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
PT - Purge and Trap
DI » Direct Injection
ND = < 10000 yg/1
ND* = < 2COOO yg/1
ug/1 = ppb (for density of water =1)
K = Quantitation below detection limit
blank contamination was observed for this compound
B-17
Technology Division
-------
Project
1-628-037
GCA Control Ko. 41909
DATA REPORT SHEET
Qualitative Compounds*
Sample I.D. „ GLPW-Z D
Analysis Date 1/15/85
Sample Matrix Liquid Instrument HP 5985 GC/HS Sample Dilution 1:1000
Parameter
Allvl Alcohol
BisUhloroinethyDether _.
Cyclohexane
Cyclohexanone
1,2-Dibroinoe thane
Dichlorgdifluorgmethane
Diethvl ether
Ethyl acetate
Ethyl acrylate^
Concentration
(ug/1)
NA
ND
ND
NA
ND
ND
ND
ND
NA ,
Parameter
Furfural
. Isgbutyl alcohol
..Methv.l. acetate
Methyl alcohol
Methyl methacrvlate
. n-Butyl alcohol .
n-Propyl benzene
Tetrahydrofuran .
. Trichlorofluoromethane^_
1^1,2-Trichroro-
1,2,2-trifluoroethane
Triflworoethanc
Concentration
(yg/1)
ND
NA
ND
NA
ND
NA
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
*Concentration based on a comparison of the total ion area of the compound with
that of the internal standard.
NA » Not analyzed by purge and trap ; see FID results
PT » Purge and Trap
DI = Direct Injection
ND
<10000 ug/1
ug/1 = ppb (for density of water = 1)
B-18
GCA
GCA CGFFCRAriCN
Technology Division
-------
Project
1-628-017
CCA Control No. -U972
DATA REPORT
PursieabUs
Sample I.D.
IP HWP-IB
„ Analysis Dace iLl
Ssmple Matrix Water Instrument HP 5985 GO/MS Sample Dilution 1:5 PT
Parameter
Chloromethane
Bromome thane
Vinvl chloride
Chlorogthane . _
Methylene chloride
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
Concentration
(yg/l)
ND*
ND
ND* .
ND
ND**
ND**
ND
Parameter
1 , 1 ,2 ,2-Tetrachloroethane
1^2-Dichloronropane
Trans- lA3-Dichloroprooene
Trichloroethene
DibromochloToraethana
Benzene
cis-l,3-DichloroproDene
Concentration
(yg/l)
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1 ND
1.1-Dichloroethene
ND
I2-Chloroethvl vinvl ether 1
XD*
1,1-Dichloroethane
Trans-l,2-dichloroethene
Chloroform
2-Butanone
1 , 1 , 1-Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Bro*nudichlorone thane
Total xvlenes
ND J
ND-.
10K
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Bromofonn
4-Methvl-2-oentanone
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethvlbenzene
Sf/rene
ND
ND*
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
PT = Purge and Trap
DI = Direct Injection
ND
KD*
<50 ug/1
<"mo ug II
* blank contamination was observed for this compound
ug/1 = ppb (for density of water = 1}
K = Quantitation below detection limit
B-19
©A
GCA
GCA CCFPCFATiCM
Technology Division
-------
Project
1-628-037
CCA Control No. 41972
DATA REPORT SHEET
Qualitative Compounds*
Sample I.D. IP-HWP-1B
Analysis Date
1/11/85
Sample Matrix Water Instrument HP 5985 GC/MS Sample Dilution 1:5 PT
Parameter
Allvl Alcohol
Bi$(chloromethYl)ether .
Cvclohexane
Cyc lohexanone
1^2-Dibromoethane
Dichlorodif luoromethane
Diethy.i^ether _
Bthvl_8cetate
EthyL acrylate
Concentration
(ug/1)
NA
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NA
.- 1
Parameter
Furfural
Isobulyl alcohol
Methyl acetate
r Methyl alcohol
Methvl methacrylate
_ n-Butyl alcohol
n-Propyl benzene
. Tetrahydrofuran
. Trichlorof luoromethane. .
1,1.2-Trichloro-
1,2,,2-trif luoroethane
Trif luoroethane
Concentration
(ug/1)
ND
NA
ND
NA
ND
NA
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
^Concentration based on a comparison of the total ion area of the compound with
that of the internal standard.
NA = Not analyzed by purge and trap
PT - Purge and Trap
DI « Direct Injection
ND
< 50 ug/1
ug/1 * ppb (for density of water = 1)
B-20
GCA
CCA CORPORATION
Technology Division
-------
Project
1-628-037
GCA Control No.
41978
Sample I.D.
IP-HWP-2D
DATA REPORT SHEETS
Purgeables
Analysis Date 1/11/85
Sample Matrix Liquid _ Instrument HP 5985 GC/MS Sample Dilution
FT
Parameter
Chloromethane
Broroomethane
Vinvl chloride
Chloroethane
Methylene chloride
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
1 , 1-Dichloroethene
1 , 1-Dichloroethane
Trans-lj2-dichloroe£nene
Chloroform
2-Butanone
1,1, 1-Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Broinodichlorome thane
Total xylenes
Concentration
(ug/1)
ND*
NO
ND*
ND
325*
985*
ND
ND
ND
ND-'
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
60
Parameter
I ,, 1^2^2-Tetrachloroethane
I ,2-Dichloropropane
Trans-1 ,3-Diqhloropropene
Trichloroethene
Dibromochlorome thane
Benzene
cis-l,3-Dichloroprooene
2-Chloroethvl vinvl ether
Bromoform
! 4-Hethvl-2-pentanone
iTetrachloroethene
1 Toluene
IChlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
Styrene
1
Concentration
(ug/1)
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND*
ND
ND*
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
PT « Purge and Trap
DI = Direct Injection
ND = < 50 ug/1
ND* = < 100 ug/1
ug/1 = ppb (for density of water = 1)
K = Quantitation below detection limit
*Corrected for blank.
B-21
GCA
GCA
Technology Division
-------
Project
1-628-037
CCA Control No. 41978
DATA REPORT SHEET
Qualitative Compounds*
Sample I.D. IP-HWP-2D
Analysis Date 1/11/85
Sample Matrix Liquid Instrument .HP 5985 ,GC/MS Sample Dilution ^ 1_:5 PT
Parameter
Allvl Alcohol
Bis(chlQromethyl)ethern r
Cyclohexane
Cyclohexanone
1 „ 2-Dibromoe thane
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Piethyl ether _
Ethyl acetate
Ethyl. acrylate
Concentration
(ug/1)
NA
ND '
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
, NA
-;•
Parameter
Furfural
IsobutYl alcohol
Methyl acetate
Methyl alcohol
Methyl methacrvlate
n-Butyl alcohol
n-Propyl benzene
Tetrahvdrofuran
Tr ich lore t luorome thane
1,1,2-Trichloro-
1,,2,,2-trif luoroethane
Trif luoroethane
Concentration
(ug/1)
ND
NA
ND
NA
ND
NA
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
^Concentration baser1 on a comparison of the total ion area of the conpound with
that of the internal standard.
NA « Not analyzed.by purge and trap
PT » Purge and Trap
DI = Direct Injection
ND
< 50 ug/1
ug/1 = ppb (for density of water = 1)
B-22
GCA
CORPORATION
Technology Division
-------
Project LzklSdilZ
GCA. Control No.
41982
DATA BErOKT SIIKETS
Portables
Sample I.D. _?_-±R?-lD Analysis Date JL/.lJt/
Sample Matrix Water Instrument Hr 5935 GC/MS Sample Dilution 1:10 PT
Parameter !
1
Chlorcmethane
Bromomethane .
Vinyl chloride
Chloroethane
Concentration
(ug/1)
NI)*
Parameter
1, 1,2.2-Tetrachloroethane
f-'D ll,2-Dichloroorooane
Ml)*
ND
Methvlcne chloride ! 491*
Acptono
Carbon disulfide
10300
Trans-l,3-Dichloroproo«?ne
Trichloroethene
Dibroraochloromethane
RonxiMic
ND 'cis-1.3-DichlorooroDene
Ul-Dichlorocthene ! Nil . 2-Chloroethvl vinvl ether
1. 1-Dichloroethane ! ND iBromoform •
Trans- 1,2-dichlorcether.e
Chloroform
2-Butanone
ND
4-Methvl-2-oentanone
Concentration
(ug/1)
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND__
UQ
ND
ND*
SD
1 ND* .
ND** 'Tetrachloroethene i ND
ND i Toluene ! 150
1.1.1-Trichloroethane 1 MD IChlorobenzene
Carbon tetrrachloride
Eromcjichloromethane
Total xylenes
1 MD lEthvlbenzene
ND
Istvrene
35000 1
1 ND
100
ND
• * t-
PT = Purge and Trap
DT = Dirf-ct Injection
SD = < 100ug/l
ND* = <200 ug/1
ug/1 = ppb (for density of water = 1)
K = Quantitstion below detection limit
= Blank contanirtation was observed for this compound.
*(A>rn.'«:lX'il for blank value.
/*i«S f]£>> ± '• ;i ,>\ '
'S$'*&tA Technology Division
B-23
GCA
-------
Project
1-628-037
CCA Control Nc. 41982
DATA REPORT SHEET
Qualitative Compounds*
Sample I.D. .^JS^gPziR. Analysis Date _l/jf/^?_
Sample Matrix ._, Water Instrument JftP^5985 GC/HS Sample Dilution
Parameter
Allvl Alcohol
B is (chloromethvl) ether
Cvclohexane
Cvclohexanone
1,,2-Dibromoe thane
1) icMoryd iriwjromclhyiK1
Diethvl ether
Concentration
(ug/1)
ND
Nl)
Nil
ND
Ml)
NH
ND
Parameter
Furfural
Isobutyl alcohol
_Methyl_acetate
_ Methyl alcohol _. . ,_
. Heth'/l^mechf.crylate
n-Butvl aJcuhol ......
n-Propyl benzene
Concentration
(ug/1)
120
ND
ND
f ND
ND
Nl;
ND
Ethvi acetate 1 W ! Tetrah^drofuran
Ethvl acrvlate
ND
Trichlorof luoronethane
l.l,2-Trichloro-
1,2.2-trif luoroetb-ine
Ttifluo roe thane
ND
ND
ND
ND
*Concpntration based on a comparison of the total ion area of the compound with
that of the internal standard.
NA - Not analyzed by purge and trap
PT = Purge and Trap
DI » Direct Injection
Iffi - <100 ug/1
ug/1 = ppb (for density of vater = 1)
B-24
GCA
CCA CORPORATION
Technology Division
-------
Project 1-628-037
GCA Control No. 41986
DATA REPORT SHEET
Additional Compounds
Sample I.D. IP-PRP-2D
Analysis Date 5/13/85
Sample Matrix
PEG
Instrument HP5985 GC/MS
Sample Dilution 1:500
V-. • f\ m t> *
Number
75-05-8
107-18-6
542-88-1
110-82-7
108-94-1
106-93-4
75-71-8
60-29-7
141-78-6
140-88-5
Parameter
Acetonitrile
Allyl Alcohol
Bis (chloromethyl ) ether
Cyclohexane
Cyclohexanone
1 , 2-Dibromoethane
Dichlorodif luorome thane
Diethyl ether
Ethyl acetate
Ethyl acrylate
Concentration
(ug/1)
ND
NA
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NA
v* • /V • O •
Number
98-01-1
78-83-1
79-20-9
67-56-1
79-41-4
71-36-3
103-65-1
109-99-9
75-69-4
76-13-1
420-26-2
Parameter
Furfural
Isobutyl alcohol
Methyl acetate
Methyl alcohol
Methyl methacrylate
n-Butyl alcohol
n-Propyl benzene
Tetrahydrofuran
Trichlorof luorome thane
1 , 1 , 2-Trichloro-
1,2, 2-trif luoroethane
1,1, 1-Trif luoroethane
Concentration
(ug/1)
ND
NA
ND
ND.
ND
NA
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Concentrations based on a comparison of the total ion area of the compound with that of the internal
standard.
PT = Purge and Trap
DI = Direct Injection
ug/1 = ppb (for density of water)
ND = < 2500 ug/1
NA = Not analyzed by Purge and Trap
K = Quantitation below detection limit
GCA
GCA CORPOP. •"'.'."
Technology Division
-------
Project 1-628-037
GCA Control Mo. 4l986
DATA REPORT SHEET
Purgeables
Sample I.D. IP-PRP-2D
Analysis Date
5/13/85
Sample Matrix PEG
Instrument HP5985 GC/MS
Sample Dilution
C.A.S.
Number
74-87-3
74-83-9
75-01-4
75-00-3
75-09-2
67-64-1
75-15-0
75-35-4
75-34-3
156-60-5
67-66-3
78-93-3
71-55-6
56-23-5
75-27-4
*
Parameter
Chloromethane
Bromomethane
Vinyl Chloride
Chloroethane
Methylene Chloride
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
1 , 1-Dichloroethylene
1 , 1-Dichloroethane
Trans-1 , 2-dichloroethylene
Chloroform
2-Butanone (MEK)
1,1, 1-Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Bromodi chloromethane
Total xylenes
Concentration
(ug/1)
ND*
ND
ND*
ND
ND
4500
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
C. • A • D •
Number
79-34-5
78-87-5
10061-2-6
79-01-6
124-48-1
71-43-2
10061-01-5
110-75-8
75-25-2
108-10-1
127-18-4
108-88-3
108-90-7
100-41-4
100-42-5
Parameter
1,1,2, 2-Tetrachloroethane
1 , 2-Dichloropropane
Trans-1 , 3-dichloropropylene
Trichloroethylene
Dibromechlorome thane
Benzene
cis-1 r 3-Dichloropropylene
2-Chloroethvlvinvlether
Bromoform
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
Tetrachloroethylene
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
Styrene
Concentratio
(ug/1)
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND*
ND
ND*
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
PT = Purge and Trap
DI = Direct Injection
ND = <2,500
ND* = <5000 ug/1
K = Quantitation below detection limit
ug/1 = ppb (for density of water)
*C.A.S. Numbers for xylene isomers are as follows: ortho- 95-47-6, meta- 108-38-3, para- 106-42-3,
bd
NJ
GCA
GCA conrop
Technology Divisioi
-------
Pro iect
1-628-037
CCA Control No.
41990
DATA REPOKT SIlKliTS
Purgeables
Sample I.D. ..Trf. ________________ Analysis Date
S.-.mple Matrix Wator ____ Instrument JiP_J>235_GC/M5_ Sample Dilution I:1° PT
Parameter
1
CoticetiI rat ion j
(ug/D !
Parameter
Concentration
(-S/D
I
Chlorome thane _ 1
Brotaomethane
Vinyl chloride
Chloroethane
Methvlene chloride
Acrtono
Carbon disulfide
1 , 1-Dichloroethene !
1. i-Dichloroethane
Trans-1 ,2-dichloroethene
Ml)*
ND
ND*
ND
131*
1 200
ND
N'!)
NO
ND
1 l,l,2,2-T«trachloro«>thane_
I 1 ,2-Dichloropropane
iTrans-l,3-Dichloropropc-ne _
llrichloroethene
• Dibromochloromethane
! Bi.-n^i.T.t.'
! cis-l,3-Dichloronrooene
• 2-Chloroethvl vinvl ether
ND
ND
[ ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND*"
iBromoform | ND
i4-Hethyi-2-pentanone NT5:'S
Chlorofora
45*
i,Tetrachloroethene
NT!)
2-Sutanone
1.1, 1-Trichlo roe thane
Carbon tetrachloride
Bromod-chloromethane
Total xvlenes
ND
ND
ND
ND
190
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethvlbenzene
Stvrene
.
bO
ND
ND
ND
PT = Purge and Trap
1)1 - Uin-cL lujoction
ND = < 100 ug/1
ND* = <200 ug/1
ug/1 = ppb (for density ot" water = 1)
K = Quaati.tation below detection limit
^Corrected for blank value.
GCA
OCA CORPORATION
Technology Division
B-27
-------
Project
1-628-037
GCA Control No. 41990
Sample I.D. _ IP-NW1RP-1D
DATA REPORT SHEET
Qualitative Compounds*
... .. Analysis Date
1/14/85
Sample Matrix Water Instrument HP,5985 GC/HS Sample Dilution 1-10. ?T
Parameter
Allyl Alcohol
Bis(chloromethvllether
Cvclohexane '_ _
Cvclohexanone
1 ,2-Dibromoethane
Dichlorodif luoromethnne
Diethyl ether
Ethvl acetate
Concentration
(ug/1)
ND
NI)
ND
ND
ND
ND
NI) J
ND
Parameter
Furfural ^ _ _^
Isobutvl alcohol
Methyl acetate
Methyl alcohol
Methyl im?thacrv]ats
n-Butyl alcohol
n-Prooyl benzene
Tetrahvdrofuran
Concentration
(ug/D
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Eshv.1. acrvlate
ND
Trichlorqf luorpTae thane.
I 1,1,2-Trichioro-
1,2^2-trif luoroethane
Trif luorcethane
ND
ND
Concentration based on a comparison of the total ion area of the compound with
that of ^ne internal standard.
NA
Not analyzed by purge and trap
PT = Purge and Trap
DI = Direct Injection
ND = < 100 ug/1
ug/i = ppb (for density of water = 1)
GCA
GCA
Technology Division
B-28
-------
Proiect
1-628-037
CCA Control No
41996
DATA KKPOPT SHEETS
Sample I.D. ^..J^tLtT-1-- Analysis Date ^
Sample Matrix Water Instrument HP 5935 GC/HS Sample Dilution 1:1000 PT
Parameter 1
i
Chlororae thane
Bromoce thane
Vinyl chloride
Chloroethane
Methvlene chloride
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
1,1-Dichloroethene
1 , 1-Dichloroethane
Trans-i ,2-dichloroethene
Chloroform
2-Butanone
1.1, 1-Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachlorid?
Bronicdichlororoe thane
Total xvlenes
PT = Purge and Trap
DI = Diri-ct Injection
— — — — • -— -— i
Concentration
(WS/D
ND*
ND
ND*
ND
ND**
ND
L_ ND
ND
ND
ND
1 ND
1 ND
ND
ND
NO
1_ ND
F,,«»r
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1 ,2-Dichloropropane
Trans-1 ,3-Dichloropropene
Trichloroethene
Dibromochlorome thane
Benzene
cis-l^-Dichloropropene _
2-Chloroethvl vinyl ether
• Bromof orm
• 4-Methyl-2-pentanone
iTetrachloroetheno
(Toluene
IChlorobenzern**
Ethvlbenrpne
Stvrene r^_
Concentration
(,g/D
ND
Nb
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND*
ND
! ND*
ND
ND
ND
ND
2400
ND = < 10,000 yg/1
SD* = < 20,000 yg/1
K -
(lor den::: i.y
-------
Project
1-628-037
CCA Control No.
41996
Saaple I.D. „ ^KM-PI-ID
DATA REPORT SHEET
Qualitative Compounds*
Analysis Date
1/14/85
Sample Matrix Water Instrument II? 5985 GC/HS Sample Dilution 1:1000 FT
Parameter
Allvl Alcohol
Bis (chlorotnethyl) ether
Cvclohexane
Cvclohexanone
IjZ-Dibromoe thane
Dichlorodifluptomethane
Diethvl ether . . .
Ethyl acetate
Concentration
(ug/1)
ND
NI)
ND
ND
Nl>
ND
ND
NO
Parameter
Furfural
Isobutyl alcohol
Methyl acetate
Methyl alcohol
Methyl methacrylate __
n-Butvl alcohol
n-Prooyl benzene.
Tetrahvdrofuran
Concentration
(ug/1)
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
[ ND
ND
f ND
Ethvl acrylate
ND
Trich lorofluorpne thane
ND
! 1,1.2-Trichloro-
1,2^2-trifluoroethane
Trif luoroethane
ND
N'D
Concentration based on a comparison of the total ion area of the compound with
that of the internal standard.
NA
Not analyzed by purge and trap
PT = Purge and Trap
DI = Direct Injection
ND = < 10,000 yg/!
ug/1 = ppb (for density of water = 1)
B-30
GCA
CCA CORPORATION
Technology Division
-------
Project
1-62S-037
CCA Gont ro L N-.I.
41999
DATA KCFORT SU-KKTS
PursoaMes
Sample I.D. ..j?!'^.-.2^ Analysis Date 1/14/85
Sample Matrix Wacer
Parameter
Chlororcethane
Bromome thane
Vinvl chloride
Chloroethane
Methvlene chloride
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
1 .1-Dichloroethene
1. 1-Dichlornsthar.e
Trans-1 .2-dichloroether.e
Chloroform
2-Butanone
1,1. 1-Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Bromcd ich lorome t hane
Total xvlenes
Instrument
HP 5985 GC/MS Sample Dilution 1:1000 PT
Concentration
(ug/i) i Parameter
ND*
Ni)
ND*
ND
ND**
r ND
i.'D
M"!
ND
ND
1 ND
NU
i NU
NH
1 IjJ^^-T-'trachlorogthane
1 1 .2-DichIoropropane
! Trans- 1, 3-D ichloropropone
i Trichloroethene
1 Dibromochloromethancj
lBun, ,,,u.
' cis-1.3-Dichlorooropene
2-Chlorcsthvl vinvl ether
' Bromoforn
' 4-Methvl-2-pentanone
Concentration
(yg/l)
ND
I NIT
ND
ND
ND
ND~"
ND
ND*
ND
ND*
'Totrach!oroer.her.c i SI)
• Toluene . ^'00
iCh torobenzene 1 ND
lEthvlber.zene
Mn (r.r.vrene
1 NU
1
i ND
ND
PT = Pur>;e and Trap
DL = .DirucL injection
ND = < 10,000 yg/1
ND* = < 20,000 us/1 .
uii/1 = ppb (£ur density OL water = 1)
K = Quanti.tation belcw detection limit
HD*"
Blank contamination was observed for this compound.
B-31
GCA
CCA CGRPORAr.GM
Technology Division
-------
Project
1-628-037
GCA Control No.
41999
DATA RF.PORT SHEKT
Qualitative Compounds*
Sample I.D. _ J^-PI-2C Analysis Date 1/14/85
Sample Matrix Water Instrument HP 5985 CC/HS Sample Dilution 1:1000 PT
Parameter
Allvl_Alcohol
B is (chloromethyl) ether
Cyclohexang
Cvc lohexanone
l,2-DibroraoethaneT
D Lchlorod if luororaethnne
Diethyl ether
Concentration
(ug/1)
ND
ND
NP
ND
ND
NO
ND
Parameter
Furfural
Isobutyl alcohol
^Methyl acetate
Methyl alcohol
^Methyl methacrylate-
._n-Buty l_ alcoho 1
r.-Prqoyl benzene
Concentration
(ug/1)
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
[ ND
ND
Ethvl acetate
ND
.Tetrahydrpfuran
NU
Ethyl acrvlafie
1 ND 1 Trichlorof luoromethane
i
.... \
. 1,1,2-Trichloro-
1 ,2,2-trif lu^roethane
Trif luoroethane
ND
ND
ND
*Concentration based on a comparison of the total ion area of the compound with
that of the internal standard.
NA = Not analyzed by purge and trap
PT = Purge and Trap
DI = Direct Injection
ND
< 10,000 -
ug/1 = ppb (for density of water = 1)
B-32
QCA
GC1A CORPORATION
Technology Division
-------
Proiecl
1-62S-037
GCA Control Ni>.
DATA Rtll'lJKT SI1KETS
Purgeables
Sample I.D. PJlE.iE Analysis Date __jL(ii(5i
Sample Matrix Water Instrument H?r5985 GC/M3 Sample Dilution 1:1000 PT
Parameter
Chloromethanc
Bronomethane
Vinyl chloride
Chloro?thane
Methvlene chloride
Acotono
Carbon disulfide
1 j 1-Dichloroechene
Concent rat. Lou
FD
PT = Purge and Trap
DI = .Direct Injection
ND = < 10,000 ys/l
ND* = < 20,000 vz/1
ug/1 = ppb (for density of water = 1)
K = Quantitacion belov detection limit
= Blank contaraiiiatiou was observed for this compound.
B-33
GCA
CCA CCPPORAHCN
Technology Division
-------
Project
1-628-037
GCA Control No. 42004
Sample I.D. *»:»*-
Sample Matrix Water
DATA REPORT SHEET
Qualitative Compounds*
Analysis Date _,
Instrument HP 5985 GC/MS Sample Dilution ^1:1000 FT
Parameter
Allvl Alcohol
Bis (chloromethvl) ether
Cvclohexane _ , T_,
Cvc lohexanone
1^2-Dib'romge^han^
D ichlo rod if Juo rone than?
Diethyl ether ,
Concentration
(yg/l)
ND
ND
NO
N!)
NI)
ND
X?T^
i« 17
Parameter
Furfural
Isobutyl alcohol
Methyl n«;i»tate
Methyl alcohol
Hp^hyl mijthacryliitq
n-Buty! olcohgl
n-Prpoyl benzene, _
Concentration
(wg/l)
ND
ND
NT>
ND
ND
ND
ND
Ethvl acetate
Ethvl acrvlate
_J ND
T-?trahydrofuran 1 ND
! ND 1 Trichlorofluoromethane 1 ^
1
L_...
1
1.1,2-Trichlqro-
1,,2,,2-trifliiQroethar.e
Trif lucroethane
NT;
ND
Concentration based on a comparison of the total ion araa of the compound with
that of the internal standard.
NA * Not analyzed by purge and trap
PT = Purge and Trap
DI * Direct Injection
ND = < 10,000 yg/1
ujj/1 s ppb (for density of water = 1)
B-34
•^^r -*l^ mtmi^^
GCA
CCA COCPCFWT!CN
Technology Division
-------
Project
1-628-03;
GCA Control No.
A2008
DATA REPOKT SHKIiTS
Purgoables
Sample I.D. __J^tl?!P-2D Analysis Date j!/JLVJL5_ .
Sanple Matrix >Tater Instrument HP 5985 GC/M? Sample Dilution 1:1000 PT
Parameter
Chlorotne thane
Bromomethane
Vinvl chloride
Chlcroethane
Methylene chloride
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
1 , 1-Bichloroethene
lj 1-Dichloroethane
Trans-1 ,2-dichloroethene
Chloroform
2-5utanone
1,1, 1-Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Bromod ich lo rone thane
Total xvlenes
Concentration]
(-g/l)
ND*
NO
NO*
ND
ND**
ND
MU
ND
MD
ND
Nn
ND
1 NU
1 ND
ND
ND
Parameter
Ijj.,2.2-Tetrachloroeth2ne
1 .2-Dichloropropane
Trann-liS-Dichloropropone
Trichloroethene
Dibromochlorome thane
Benzene
^cis-1 ,3-Dichloropropene
2-Chloroethyl vinvl ether
[Bromofora
[4-Me t hy 1-2-pent anone
[Tetrachloroethene
1 Toluene
IChlorobenzene
Ethvlbenzene
Stvrene
Concentration
(ug/1)
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND*
i ND
ND*
ND
i ND
ND
ND
ND
PT = Purge and Trap
DI = Direct Injection
ND = < 10,000 yg/1
ND* = < 20,000 yg/1
UQ/I = ppb (for density ot water - 1)
K = Quantitation below detection limit
ND*
Blank contanination was obser-/ed for this compound.
B-35
GCA
f K:.A cOPPORAncr;
Technology Division
-------
Project
1-623-037
GCA Control Kb. 42008
DATA REPORT SHEET
Qualitative Compounds*
Sanple I.D. _
Analysis Date j/.1*/---
Sample Matrix Water Instrument HP 5985 CC/HS_ Sample Dilution 1:1000 PT
Parameter
Allvl Alcohol
Bis(chloromethvl)ether .
Cvclohexane
Cvclohgxanone
1 .2-Dibromoethane
Dichlorodifluoromethiinc
Diethvl ether
Ethvl acetate
Ethvl acrvlate
Concentration
(•-•8/1)
ND
ND
NO
NH
Ml)
ND
ND
ND
ND
r
Parameter
Furfural
Isobutyl alcohol
Methyl acetate
. Methyl. alcohol
Methvl methacrylate
n-Butvl alcohol
n-Proovl benzene
Tetrahydrofuran
Trichlorof luoromethane
1,,1,2-Tcichloro-
I,2a2— trif luoroethane
Tr if luo roe thane
Concentration
(ug/U
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
iN'D
ND
ND
^Concentration based on a comparison of the total ion area of the compound with
that of the internal standard.
NA = Not analyzed by purge and trap
PT - Purge and Trap
DI » Direct Injection
ND = < 10,000 yg/l
ug/1 = ppb (for density of water = 1)
B-36
GCA
Technoioqv Division
-------
iIl'A I'nnl ri»!
42011
DATA REPOJ.'T SHKiiTS
Sample I.D. ..Ht^JZJS Analysis Date
Sample Matrix Water Instrument HP 5985 GC/MS Sample Dilution 1:2000 PT
Parameter
Chloromethane
Bromome thane
Vinvl chloride
Chloroethane
Methvlene chloride
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
1 , 1-Dichloroethene
1, 1-Dichloroethar.e
Trans-1 ,2-dichloroethene
Chloroform
2-Butanone
1,, 1 . 1-Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Bromcdichloromethano
Total xyienes
Concentration
(ug/1)
ND*
ND
ND*
ND
ND**
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NC
ND
NO
L ND
Parameter
1, 1,2,,2-Tetrachloroethane
lA2-Oichloropropane
Trans-1, 3-Dichloropropene
Trichloroethene
Dibromochloromethnne
Benzene . .
cis-1 ^-Dichlorooropene
2-Chloroethvl vinvl ether
Bromoform
: 4-MethYl-2-pentarone
(Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Chlorobonzene
Ethvlbenzene
Stvrene
Concentration
(ug/1)
ND
M)
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND*
ND
ND*
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
FT = Purge and Trap
DI = Direct Injection
ND = < 20,000 yg/1
ND* = < 40,000 yp/1
ug/1 = ppb (for density of water = 1)
K = Quantitation below detection limit
Blank contamination was observed for this compound.
B-37
GCA
Technology Division
-------
Project
1-628-037
CCA Control Ko. 42011
DATA REPORT SHEET
Qualitative Compounds*
Sample I.D. _j£t5£!£
Analysis Date __
1/14/85
Sample Matrix Water Instrument ^HF_5985 ^GC/HS. Sanple Dilution 1:2000 PT
Parameter
AHvl Alcohol
B is Cchloromethyl) ether
Cvclohcxane
C^clohexanone
1.2-Dibromoe thane
Dichlorodif luoromethane
Diethyl ether
Ethvl acetate
Ethvl acrvlate
Concentration
(yg/1)
ND
NI3
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
Parameter
Furfural
Isobutvl alcohol
Methyl acetate _
Methyl alcohol
Methyl methacrylate
n-Butvl alcohol
n-Proovl benzene
TeCrahvdrofuran . . . . __
Trichlorof luoromethane __
1^1.2-Trichloro-
1,,2,,2-trifluoroethane
Trif luoroethane
Concentration
(lig/l)
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
^Concentration base-1 on a comparison of the total ion area of the compound with
that of the internal standard.
NA = Not analyzed by purge and trap
PT » Purge and Trap
DI = Direct Injection
ND - < 20,000 jig/1
ug/1 = ppb (for density of water = 1)
B-38
GCA
CCA CCRPOHAIION
Tectinolcgy Division
-------
Project
1-628-037
(i.-ni r(i i
'•20U
DATA REPORT SHKIiTS
Purgeablts
Sample I.D. ^lillM ^_ Analysis Date
Sample Matrix Water Instrument HP 5985 GC/MS Sample Dilution 1:2000 PT
Parameter
Chlororae thane
Bromom^th.in^
Vinyl chloride
Chlorqethane
Concentration
(UK/I )
ND*
Nl>
ND*
ND
Methvlene chloride ! ND**
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
ND
F.r*t.r
ltl ,2,2-Tgtraghloroethane
I 2-Dii-M.>i;o;>rop;im.'
Trans-1 ,3-Dichloroorooene
Tjjichloro^thfm;
Dibromochloromethanq
Benzene
ND ! cis-l,3-Dichlorooropene
Concentration
(ug/1)
ND
tlTi
ND
_— _
MD
ND
ND
ND
.^BMA.^
1. l-Djchloroethene
i 2-Chloroethvl vinyl ether t
1. i-Dichloroethane 1
Trans-lj!2-dichloroethene I
Chloroform 1
ND
ND
ND
iBromofortn _ _
!4-Meth_yl-2-per.tanonc
LTetrachloroethene
1 ND
! ND*
I ND
2-Butanone
1,1, 1-Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Bromodichloromethane
Total xvlenes
ND '.Toluene
ND IChlorobenzene
ND
ND
FD
Ethvlbenzene . _ . . .
Stvronc
ND
ND
ND
ND
PT s Purge and Trap
DI * Direct Injection
ND
K =
< 20,000 VR/1
= < 40,000 yg/1
- ppb (for density of water = I)
Quantitation below detection limit
a Blank contamination was observed for this compound.
B-39
OCA
Technology Division
-------
Project
1-628-037
GCA Control No. 42014
Sample I.D.
Sample Matrix
KM-ST-1B
DATA REPORT SHKET
Qualitative Compounds*
__ Analysis Date
1/14/85
Water Instrument HP 5985 GC/MS Sample Dilution 1:2000 FT
Parameter
Allvl Alcohol
B is (chloromechyl) ether
Cvclohexane
Cvc lohexanone
1 ,2-DibrqmQethane
Dichlorodifjuororaeth.nne
Diethyl ether
Ethvl acetate
Ethyl acrvlate
Concentration
(ug/1)
ND
NI)
NP
NO
NI)
NO
Ni)
NO
ND
Parameter
. Furfural
_Isobutyl ajcohoj
Methvl acetate
. Methyl alcohol
Methyl m*>tnacryjat;e
n-Butvl alcohol
n-Propyl benzene
Tetrahydrofuran
Trichlgrof luorome thane
. 1,1,2-Trichloro-
1,2,2-trif luoroethane .
Trif luoroethane
Concentration
(ug/1)
ND
ND
ND
ND
NI)
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Concentration based on a comparison of the total ion area of the compound with
that of the internal standard.
NA » Not analyzed by purge and trap
FT = Purge and Trap
DI » Direct Injection
NU = < 20,000 yg/1
ug/1 = ppb (for density of water - 1)
B-40
©i^gv A GO\ CGRPCRAriCM
~-i£?*-lak. Technology Division
GCA
-------
Project
1-628-037
GCA Control No. 42018
DATA REPORT SIIKETS
Purgeables
Sample I.D. ..KM-ST-2B
Analysis Date _
Sample Matrix Liquid Instrument HP 5985 GC/MS Sample Dilution 1:2000 FT
Parameter
Chloromethane
Bromotaethsne
Vinyl .chloride
Chloroethane
Methvlene chloride
Acetone
Carbon .disulfide
1 „ 1-Dichloroethene
1 , 1-Dichloroethane
Trans-1 ,2-dichloroethene
Chloroform
2-Butanone
1 , 1, 1-Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Bromod ichloromethane
Total xvlenes
Concentration
(ug/1)
ND*
ND
ND*
ND
ND**
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND'
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Parameter
1 ,, 1 ,2 ,2-Tetrachloroethane
1 ,,2-Dichloroprooane
Trans-1 ,3-Dichloropropene
Trichloroethene
Dibromochloromethane
Benzene
cis-l,3-Dichloropropene
2-Chloroethyl vinvl ether
Bromoform
1 4-Methyl-2-oentanone
[.Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
Styrene
Concentration
(ug/1)
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NET
ND
. ND*
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
PT
DI
ND
Purge and Trap
Direct Injection
< 20000 yg/1
< 40000 ug/1
ug/1 = ppb (for density of water = 1}
K = Quantisation below detection limit
= blank contamination observed for this compound
B-41
GCA
GCA CORPORA HCN
Technology Division
-------
Project
1-628-037
GCA Control No. 42013
DATA REPORT SHEET
Qualitative Compounds*
Sample I.D. _ KM-ST- 2B
Analysis Date 1/15/85
Sample Matrix Liquid
Instrument HP 5985 GC/HS Sample Dilution 1:2000 PT
Parameter
Ally I Alcohol
Bis^chloromethyDether
Cyclohexane
Cyclohexanone
1^2-Dibromoethane
Dichlorodifluoromethane_.
Diethyl ether
Ethvl acetate
Ethvl acrylate
Concentration
(ug/1)
NA
ND
ND
__/NA.
ND
ND
ND
ND
NA
.-'<
Parameter
^Furfural .._ „
_Isobutyl_alcohol .
Methyl acetate
rMethyl_a!cohol
Methyl methacrylate
.n-Butyl_alcohol
n-Propyl benzene
Tetrahydrofuran „
Trichlorof luorome thane
1,1,2-Trichloro-
1,2,,2-trifluoroethane
Trifluoroethane . ..T v.
Concentration
(ug/1)
MD
NA
ND
NA
ND
NA
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
^Concentration based on a comparison of the total ion area of the compound with
that of the internal standard.
NA « Not analyzed by purge and trap ; see FID results
PT - Purge and Trap
DI - Direct Injection
ND
20000 ug/1
ug/1 = ppb (for density of water = 1)
B-42
GCA
GCA CORPORATION
Technology Division
-------
Pro j ec t 1-628-037
Contro
TA KEPOKT SHEET: TSDF
Volatile Organic Compounds
Instrument and Sample Volume*
UP 5985 GC/HS 1:5 PT
Sample Identification_^MD-£-2J) Finnigan OWA GC/MS_
Analysis Date 1/10/85 PE 3920 CC/FTD
Sample Matrix Water HP 5890 GC/FID
Compound
Acetone
Acetonitrile
Allvl Alcohol
Aniline
Benzene
Bis(chloromethvl)ethr r
Bromodichlorome thane
Bromoform
Bromome thane
Carbon disulfide
Carbon tetracliloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
2-Chloroethvl vinvl ether
Chloroform
Chlorotne thane
C is-l,3-Dichloropropene
Cvclohexane
Cvclohexanone
Dibroraochloroir.9 thane
1 ,2-Dibr orao ethane
D ichlorcd if luorome thane
1 , 1-Dichoroethane
1,2-Dichloroethylene
1 , 1-Dichloroethvlene
1,2-Dichlorooropane
Diethyl ether
Ethyl acetate
Ethyl acrylate
Ethylene
Concentration
(mg/1)
_ -5-40 _
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND*
N13
ND*
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Compound
Ethylene chloride
Ethylene dibromide
Ethylene dichloride
Furfural
Isobutyl alcohol
Methyl acetate
Methvl alcohol
Methyl chloride
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methvl isobutvl ketone
Methyl methacrvlate
Methylene chloride
n-Butvl alcohol
n-Propvl benzene
Styrene
1 , 1,2.2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrnchloroethylene
Tetr.ihydrofuran
Toluene
Trans i.3-Dichlorooropene
1,1. l-Trichlorcsihaae
Trichloroethvlene
Trichlorof luorometh-ine
1,1,2-Trichloro-
-1 ,2,2-Trif luoro;r.eth.ane
Tr if luoroe thane
Vinyl chloride
Xylenes
Concentration
(rag/1)
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND*
ND
0.31
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.31
ND
ND
ND
0.09
0.87
ND
ND
ND
ND-
ND
*PT « Purge and Trap
DI = Direct Injection
HS = Headspace
ND = < 0.05 mg/1
ND* = < 0.10 mg/1
B-43
OCA IhCHNOLOGY DIVISION
-------
Project
1-628-037
CCA Control No.
41883
DATA REPORT SHEETS
Purgeables
Sample I.D.
Sample Matrix Water
Analysis Date __l/10/85
Instrument HP 5985 GC/MS Sample Dilution 1:5 PT
Par arse ter
Chlorcme thar.e
Brocoie thane
Vinyl chloride
Chloroethane
Methvlene chloride
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
1 , 1-Dichloroethene
1 . 1-Dichloroethane
Trans-1 ,2-dichloroethene
Chlorofora
2-Butanone
1 . !„ 1-Trichloroethane
Carbon tefrachloride
Bromodichlorome thane
Total xyienes
?T = Purge and Trap
L»I » Direct Injection
Concentration
(ug/1)
ND*
NO
ND**
KD**
ND*
ND
MD
NO
ND
ND •'
ND
ND
90
ND
ND
ND
Parameter
1,1,2, 2-Tf?trachloroethane
1 ,2-Dichloroprooane
Trans-1 ,3-Dichlorooropene
Trichloroethene
Dibrotnochlororae thane
Benzene
cis-1 ,3-Dichloropropene
2-Chloroethvl vinvl ether
Eromoforai
4-^M3thvl-2-pentanone
Tetrachloroethene
iTolu^ne
ChlorobenzenQ
Ethylbenzene
Stvrene
Concentration
(ug/1)
ND
ND
L ND
870
ND
ND
1 ND
ND*
ND
ND*
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND = < 50 ug/1
< 100 ug/1
ug/1 » ppb (for density of water m 1)
K = Quantitation below detection liiait
Blank contamination was observed for this compound.
B-44
GCA
GCA CGFPCRAriCM
Technology Division
-------
Project
1-623-C37
CCA Control Ko.
DATA REPORT SHEET
Qualitative Compounds*
Ssnple I.D. ....MC-C-1D,
Sample Matrix Water
Analysis Date __j-/J-°/85 ._
Instrument H? .5985 GC/HS Sample Dilution 1:5 PT
Parameter
Allvl Alcohol
Bis(ch!oroaethyl)ethpr
Cyclohsxane
Cyclohexancr.a
1.2-Dibromoethane
Dichlorodif luorqTr.ethrtne
Di-;r.hvl ether
E^hvl acetate
F.£hvi acrvlate
Concantration
(•-g/D
NA
NU
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NA -
Parameter
Furfural
IsobutYl alcohol
Methyl acetate
Methyl alcohol
Methyl methacrylate
n-Butyl alcohol
n-Procvl benzene
Tetrahvdrofurati
Trichlorof-luorome thane
1 1,1.2-Trichlbro-
._ ...... _ L .l^.Z-trifluotoethane
i Trifluoroethane
Concentration
(yg/1)
ND
NA
ND
NA
ND
NA
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
*Concentration based on a comparison of the total ion area of the compound with
that of the internal standard.
NA = Not. analyzed by purge and trap
PT = Purge and Trap
DI = Direct Injection
IIS = < 50 ug/1
ppb (for density of water = 1)
B-45
GCA
GCA COP?;;RAT;CM
Technology Division
-------
Project
1-628-037
GCA Control No. 41929
DATA REPORT SHEET
Purgeables
Sample I.D. TRI-ROL1-1P
Analysis Date 2/14/35
Sample Matrix Liquid
Instrument HP5985 GC/MS
Sample Dilution 1*500
C.A.S. .
Number
74-87-3
74-83-9
75-01-4
75-00-3
75-09-2
/• T a A _ i
b / — b 4 1
75-15-0
75-35-4
75-34-3
156-60-5
67-66-3
78-93-3
71-55-6
56-23-5
75-27-4
*
Parameter
Chloromethane
Bromomethane •
Vinyl Chloride
Chloroethane
Methylene Chloride
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
1 , 1-Dichloroethylene
1 , 1-Dichloroethane
Trans-1 , 2-dichloroethylene
Chloroform
2-Butanone (MEK)
1,1, 1-Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Bromodi chloromethane
Total xylenes
Concentration
(ug/1)
ND*
ND
ND*
ND
5900
oo r\r\n
a , uujj
ND
ND
ND
ND
1500 K
ND
ND
ND
ND
44,000
I* • A • u> •
Number
79-34-5
78-87-5
10061-2-6
79-01-6
124-48-1
n— A 1 — O
«i J t.
10061-01-5.
110-75-8
75-25-2
108-10-1
127-18-4
108-88-3
108-90-7
100-41-4
100-42-5
Parameter
1,1,2, 2-Tetrachloroethane
1 , 2-Dichloropropane
Trans-1 , 3-dichloropropylene
Trichloroethvlene
Dibromochlorome thane
uenzene
cis-1, 3-Dichloropropylene
2-Chloroethylvinylether
Bromoform
4-"Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
Tetirachloroethvlene
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
Styrene
Concentratio
(ug/1)
ND
ND
ND
2000
ND
ND
ND
IJD*
ND
ND*
5500
22.000
ND
25,000
ND
w
-p-
PT = Purge and Trap
DI = Direct Injection
ug/1 = ppb (for density of water)
*C.A.S. Numbers for xylene isomers are as follows;
ND = < 5000 yg/1
ND* - < 10,000 yg/1
K = Quantitation below detection limit
ortho- 95-47-6, meta- 108-38-3, para- 106-42-3.
GCA
Technology Divisioi
-------
Project 1-628-037
GCA Control No. 41929
Sample I.D. TRI-ROL1-1D
Sample Matrix Liquid
DATA REPORT SHEET
Additional Compounds
Instrument HP5985 GC/MS
Analysis Date . 2/14/85
Sample Dilution 1:500
V^ • /» • w •
Number
75-05-8
107-18-6
542-R8-1
110-82-7
108-94-1
106-93-4
75-71-8
60-29-7
141-78-6
140-88-5
Parameter
Acetonitrile
Allyl Alcohol
Bis(chloromethyl ) ether
Cyclohexane
Cyclohexanone
1 , 2-Dibromoethane
Di chlorodif luoromethane
Diethyl ether
Ethyl acetate
Ethyl acrylate
•-•
Concentration
(ug/1)
ND
NA
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NA
v*« • f\ • w •
Number
98-01-1
78-83-1
79-20-9
67-56-1
79-41-4
71-36-3
103-65-1
109-99-9
75-69-4
76-13-1
420-26-2
Parameter
Furfural
Isobutyl alcohol
Methyl acetate
Methyl alcohol
Methyl methacrylate
n-Butyl alcohol
n-Propyl benzene
Tetrahydrofuran'
Trichlorof luoromethane
1,1,2-Trichloro-
1,2, 2-trif luoroethane
1,1, 1-Trif luoroethane
Concentration
(ug/1)
ND
•NA
ND
NA
ND
MA
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Concentrations based on a comparison of the total ion area of the compound with that of the internal
standard.
PT = Purge and Trap
DI « Direct Injection
ug/1 = ppb (for density of water)
ND " < 5000 ug/1
NA = Not analyzed by Purge and Trap
K = Quantitation below detection limit
^*r ^<*^ T '. • • T-
GCA
GCA CORPOR •••'•:'.':
Technology Division
-------
Project
1-623-037
GCA Control No. 41933
DATA REPORT SHEETS
Purgeables
Sample I.D. ^TRI-ROL1-2D
Analysis Date
1/11/85
Sample Matrix Water Instrument HP 5985 GC/MS Sample Dilution 1:5 FT
Parameter
Chloromethane
Bromomethane
Vinyl chloride^ _
Chloroethane
Methylene chloride
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
1 . 1-Dichloroethene
lj 1-Dichloroethane _
Trans-1 ,2-dichloroethene
Chloroform
2-Butanone
1.1, 1-Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Bromodichlorome thane
Total xylenes
Concentration
(ug/1)
ND*
ND
ND*
ND
555*
390*
ND
ND
ND
ND'
37K
250
ND
ND
ND
105
Parameter
1,,1,,2^2-Tetrachloroe thane
1 ,2-Dichloropropane
Trans-1 ,3-Dichloroprooene
Trichloroethene
Dibromochlorome thane
Benzene
cis-l,3-Dichloronropene _
2-Chloroethvl vinvl_ether
Bromoform _
4-Methvl-2-pentanone
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Chlorobenzene _
Ethylbenzene
Stvrene
Concentration
(ug/1)
ND
ND
ND
24K
[ ND
ND
ND
ND*
ND
ND*
ND
137
ND
125
ND
PT « Purge and Trap
DI = Direct Injection
ND - < 50 ug/1
ND* « < 100 ug/1
ug/1 = ppb (for density of water = 1)
K = Quantitation below detection limit
*Corrected for blank value.
B-48
GCA
r
-------
Project
I-628-Q37
GCA Control No. 41933
DATA REPORT SHEET
Qualitative Compounds*
Sample I.D. __TRI-ROL1-20
Analysis Date 1/11/85
Sample Matrix Water Instrument HP 5985 GC/MS Sample Dilution 1:5 FT
Parameter
AllvUAlcohol
pj.$(chlpro:nethyllether
Cyclohexane
Cyclohexanone^
1,2-Dibromoethane^
D ichlorod if luorome thane
Diethyl_ether_ _,, _ . ..
Ethyl acetate
Ethvl acrvlate
Concentration
(yg/1)
NA
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NA
. "*
Parameter
Furfural
Isobutyl ajcohol
Methvl acetate
Methyl alcohol
Methvl methacrvlate
n-Butyl alcohol
n-Prooyl benzene
Tetrahydrofuran
Trichlorof luoroTae thane
1,1.2-Trichlpro-
1^2,2-tTifluoroetbane
Tr if luoroe thane
Concentration
(ug/D
ND
NA
ND
NA
ND
NA
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
^Concentration based on a comparison of the total ion area of the compound with
that of the internal standard.
NA * Not analyzed by purge and trap
PT * Purge and Trap
DI * Direct Injection
ND - <50 ug/1
ug/1 = ppb (for density of water = 1)
B-49
GCA
GCA CORPORATION
Technology Division
-------
Project
1-62S-037
GCA Control No.
DATA REFUHT SIIKKTS
Purgeables
Sample I.D. _ TRI-ROL2-1B
Analysis Date
Sample Matrix Liquid Instrument HF 5985 GC/MS Sample Dilution 1:5 FT
Paraneter
Chloromethane
Bromome thane
Vinyl chloride
Chloroethane
Methvlene chloride
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
!„ 1-Dichloroethene
1 , 1-Dichloroethane
Trans-l^-dichloroethene
Chlorofora
2-Butanone
1,1, l-Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloriu >
Bromodichloromethane
Total xvlenes
Concentrat ion
(ug/1)
NO*
ND
NU*
ND
ND**
325*
ND
ND
ND
ND-'
10K
ND
ND
ND
ND
200
Parameter
1,1, 2 ,2-Tetrachloroethane
1 ,2-Dichloropropsne
Trans-1 ,3-Dichloroprci:ene
Trichloroethene
Dibromochloroinethane
Benzene
c is-1 ,3-Dichlorocrooene
2-ChloroetV't vinvl ether
Bromofom
4-MRthyl-2-pentanpnn
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Chlorobgnzpne
Ethvlbenzene
Styrene
Concentration
(ug/1)
ND
ND
ND
23K
ND
. . ND
ND
ND*
ND
ND*
10K
166
KD
100
ND
PT = Purge and Trap
DI - Direct Injection
ND - < 50 ug/1
ND* = < 100 ug/1
us/1 = ppb (for density of water = 1)
K = Quantitation below detection limit
*Corrected for blank value
ND** - Blank contamination observed for this compound.
B-50
c*i^ Technology
-------
Project
1-628-037
GCA Control Ho. 41935
Sample I.D. _.. TRI-ROL2-1B
DATA REPORT SHEET
Qualitative Compounds*
Analysis Date
1/11/85
Sample Matrix Liquid Instrument HP 5985 GC/MS Sample Dilution 1:5 PT
Parameter
Allvl Alcohol
Bis(chlorociethyl)ether
Cvclohexane __ n
Cyclohexanone
1.2-Dibromgethane
Dich iorod if luorome thane
Diethyl_ether
Ethyl acetate
Ethy^acrylate
Concentration
(ug/1)
NA
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NA
Parameter
Furfural
Isobutyl alcohol
Methyl acetate
Methyl alcohol
Methyl methacrvlate
n-Butyl alcohol
n-Proovl benzene
Tetrahvdrofuran
Trichlorof luorome thane.
1,1,2-Trichloro-
1,,2,2-trif luoroethane
Trif luoroethane .
Concentration
(yg/1)
ND
NA
ND
NA
ND
NA
ND
f ND
ND
ND
ND
Concentration based on a comparison o'~ the total ion area of the compound with
that of the internal standard.
NA = Not analyzed by purge and trap
PT » Purge and Trap
DI = Direct Injection
ND « < 50 ug/1
ug/1 * ppb (for density of water = 1)
B-51
GCA
GCA CORPORATION
Technology Division
-------
Project 1-628-037
GCA Control No. 41941
DATA REPORT SHEET
Purgeables
Sample I.D. TRI-ROL2-2D
Analysis Date. 2/14/85
Sample Matrix Liquid
Instrument HP5985 GC/MS
Sample Dilution 1:500
v- • f\ • O •
Number
74-87-3
74-83-9
75-01-4
75-00-3
75-09-2
67-64-1
75-15-0
75-35-4
75-34-3
156-60-5
67-66-3
78-93-3
71-55-6
56-23-5
75-27-4
*
.Parameter
Chloromethane
Bromomethane
Vinyl Chloride
Chloroethane
Methylene Chloride
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
1, 1-Dichloroethylene
1 , 1-Dichloroethane
Trans-1 , 2-dichloroethylene
Chloroform
2-Butanone (MEK)
1,1, 1-Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Bromodi chloromethane
Total xylenes
Concentration
(ug/1)
ND*
ND
ND*
ND
2400 '
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
2500
C.A.S.
Number
79-34-5
78-87-5 '
10061-2-6
79-01-6
124-48-1
71-43-2
10061-01-5
110-75-8
75-25-2
108-10-1
127-18-4
108-88-3
108-90-7
100-41-4
100-42-5
Parameter
1,1,2, 2-Tetrachloroethane
1 , 2-Dichloropropane
Trans-1 , 3-dichloropropylene
Trichloroethvlene
Dibromo chloromethane
Benzene
cis-1 , 3-Dichloropropylene
2-Chloroethylvinylether
Bromoform
4-Methvl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
Tetrachloroethvlene
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
Styrene
Concentratio
(ug/1)
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND*
ND
ND*
ND
ND
ND
19000
ND
PT = Purge and Trap
DI = Direct Injection
ND » < 5000 Mg/1
ND* = < 10,000 y'g/1
K = Quantisation below detection limit
ug/1 = ppb (for density of water)
*C.A.S. Numbers for xylene isomers are as follows: ortho- 95-47-6, meta- 108-38-3, para- 106-42-3.
W
I — -, » ~r» .-•*.,
NJ . . OOZiA. Technology Divi'sioi
GCA
-------
Project 1-628-037
GCA Control No. 41941
Sample I.D. TRT-ROL2-2D
Sample Matrix Liquid
DATA REPORT SHEET
Additional Compounds
Instrument HP5985 GC/MS
Analysis Date 2/14/85
Sample Dilution 1;500
C.A.S.
Number
75-05-8
107-18-6
542-88-1
110-82-7
108-94-1
106-93-4
75-71-8
60-29-7
141-78-6
140-88-5
Parameter
Acetonitrile
Allyl Alcohol
Bis (chloromethvl )ether
Cyclohexane
Cyclohexanone
1 , 2-Dibromoethane
Dichlorodifluorome thane
Diethyl ether
Ethyl acetate
Ethyl acrylate
•"*«.
Concentration
(ug/1)
ND
NA
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NA
C.A.S.
Number
98-01-1
78-83-1
79-20-9
67-56-1
79-41-4
71-36-3
103-65-1
109-99-9
75-69-4
76-13-1
420-26-2
Parameter . '
i
Furfural
Isobutyl alcohol
Methyl acetate
Methyl alcohol
Methyl methacrylate
n-Butyl alcohol
n-Propyl benzene
Tetrahydrof uran
Trichlorof luorome thane
1,1,2-Trichloro-
1,2, 2-trif luoroethane
1 , 1 ,1-Trif luoroethane
Concentration
(ug/1)
ND
• NA
ND
NA
ND
NA
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Concentrations based on a comparison of the total ion area of the compound with that of the internal
standard.
PT = Purge and Trap
DI = Direct Injection
ug/1 = ppb (for density of water)
ND = < 5000 ug/1
NA = Not analyzed by Purge and Trap
K « Quantitation below detection limit
>^-*- ^*^r "t - ~~l
GCA
GCACORPOR." ':<:
Technology Division
-------
Project
1-628-037
GCA Control No.
41945
DATA REPORT SHEETS
Purgeables
Sample I.D. __TRI-ROL3-1D.
Analysis Date ^1/11/85
Sample Matrix Liquid Instrument HP 5985 GC/MS Sample Dilution 1:5 PT
Parameter
Chloromethane
Bromome thane
Vinyl chloride
Chloroethane
Methylene chloride
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
1 , 1-Dichloroethene
1 , 1-Dichloroethane
Trans-1 ,2-dichloroethene
Chloroform
2-Butanone
1,1, 1-Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Bromodichlorome thane
Total xylenes
Concentration
(ug/1)
NO*
ND
ND*
ND
ND**
ND**
ND
ND
ND
ND/'
10K
ND
ND
NU
ND
ND
Parameter
1 , Ij2 , 2-Tetrachloroethane
1 ,2-Dichlorooropane
Trans-1 ,3-Dichloropropene
Trichloroethene
Dibromochlorome thane
Benzene
cis-1 ,3-Dichloropropene _
2-Chloroethvl vinvl ether
Bromoform
4-Me thvl-2-pent anone
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
Styrene . . ^
.
Concentration
(ug/1)
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND*
ND
ND*
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
PT « Purge and Trap.
DI = Direct Injection
ND = < 50 ug/1
ND* » < 100 ug/1
ug/1 = ppb (for density of water = 1)
K = Quantitation below detection limit
f{I)** = Blank contamination observed for this compound.
B-54
GI':A CC
^2L Technology Division
GCA
-------
Project
.1-628-037
GCA Control Ko.
41945
Sample I.D. _ TRI-ROL3-1D
DATA REPORT SHEET
Qualitative Compounds*
v
Analysis Date
1/11/85
Sample Matrix Liquid Instrument HP 5985 GC/MS Sample Dilution 1:5 PT ._.
Parameter
Allvl Alcohol
Bis(chiUjromethYl)ether
Cvclohexane _
Cyclohexanong _r__T_
1,,2-Dj.b.ronio. ethane
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Diethyl ether
Ethyl acetate
EthYl_acry.late_.. .
Concentration
(ug/1)
NA
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NA
. 'i
Parameter
Furfural
Igpfou'ty.! alcohoj^ _T ^
Methyl acetate
Methvl alcohol
Methvl methacrylate
n-Butyl alcohol
n— Propyl benzene
Te t rahydro f uran
Trichlorof luorome thane
1,,1,,2-Trichloro-
1 ,, 2 , 2-tr if luoroethane
Trif^uo roe thane
Concentration
(ug/1)
ND
NA
ND
NA
ND
NA
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
^Concentration based on a comparison of the total ion area of the compound with
that of the interoal standard.
NA * Not analyzed by purge and trap
PT ** Purge and Trap
DI *> Direct Injection
ND - < 50 ug/1
ug/1 = ppb (for density of water = 1)
\ A GCA COfiPGPATICfl
B-55
GCA
Technology Division
-------
APPENDIX C
RADIAN CORPORATION
DATA REPORT FORMS
C-l
-------
r ILI u ID tin: iin^o
SAMPLE CONTROL NO: 421
SAMPLE TYPC: LIQUID
o
1
M COMPOUND
I'ARAFFins
C-2 VOC
N-HEPT *NE
N-NONANE
n-uNfiECANE
CO ALKAf.'E
CIO« ALKANE
CIO* ALKANE
CIO* ALKANE
CIO* ALKANC
cio* ALKAUE
cio» ALKANE
C10« ALKATIE
CIO* ALKANC
CIO* ALKANE
CIO* ALKANE
CIO* ALKANE
CIO* ALKANE
Cin« ALKANE
CIO* ALKANE
TOTAL AROHATICS
OENJENE
IOLUENE
STYRFNE
M-E1HYLTOLUENE
1 . ?*4-TR IHETHYLOEN7ENE
INDAN
li'MOCNl IFICD VOCICI
UNIDENTIFIED VOC
UNIDENTIFIED VOC
PARAFFINS
TOTAL AROHATICS
IINIIICNT IF ICO VOC
TOTAL NHIIC
(A| ARTIFACT COMPOUND - CONCENTPAT
If!) VARIABLE RECOVERY THROUGH DRY!
(C) CONCCNTR AT10NS UERE CALCULATCO
DATE SAMPLED: u/?a/iH
n'*3 DATE ANALYZED: 02/01/35
CONCEN1RATION CONCENTRATION
«Nr,-C/MLJ (HG/L>» COHPOUND ING-C/ML) IMG/D*
22.6- 0.026
23.1 0.02B
32.1 0.038
62.9 0.074
6.6 0.010
IS. 8 0.019
21.5 0.025
13.* 0.016
23.8 0.028
10.5 0.012
22.2 0.026
144. 0 0.171
15.2 0.018
91.3 0.108
21. fl 0.026
34. n 0.041
13.9 0.016
15.1 0.01A
533.0 0.632
13.0 0.014
45.4 0.050
24.1 0.026
21.5 0.024
9.5 0.011
60.5 0.066
26.2 0.031
54.1 0.065
1125.5 1.334
174.0 0.191
80. 3 0.096ICI
1379.1 1.621
ION NOT USED IH TOTAL NMHC CALCULATIONS.
NG .SYSTEM - CONCENTRATIONS NOT US CO IN TOTAL NMHC CALCULATIONS.
USING VALUES OF 6 FOH Hit CARHftN NDHI'ER ANO lib FOR THE MOLECULAR UCinilT.
ica
UNITS ART COUIVALfMl 1O PPM ASSUMING A OTNSITY OF I.
-------
ruin ID NO: UB«M
CONIROL NO: 4?i«-44
TYPE: notiln
DATE SAMPLED: i
PAIL ANALY/LO: 01/31/80
CONCENTRATION
(Nr>-C/HL> IH3/L)'
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION
IMG/L»»
PARAFFINS
NCOHEXMIE
M-I'FPT ANE
J-MEIHYLHEPTANE
N-UNOCCANE
C T ALKAMF
C1 ALKANE
CO ALKANF
C9 ALKANE
C'l ALKAflE
Cin* ALKAHE
CIO* ALKANE
Cl» At. KANE
C10» ALKAHE
CIO* ALKAIIE
CIO* ALKANE
1 CIO* ALKANE
W C10» ALKAIIE
C11» ALKANC
CIO* ALKANT
cio* ALKANE
cio* ALKANF
r 1 1 * Aiuiur
Liu* A u 1% A "I L
CIO* ALKAIIE
C13. ALKANE
CIO* ALKANt
CIO* ALKANC
CIO. ALKANE
CIO* AtKAWC
CIO* ALKANE
CIO. ALKANE
CIO* ALrtAME
MO* ALKANE
CIO* ALKANC
CIO* ALKAIIE
CIO* ALKMIT
CM* ALKANC
(A) ARTIFACT COMPOUND - CONCENTRATION
(R) VAHIAflLF RECOVERY TI'ftOUOH DRYING
11.5
5.7
6.B
86. 9
51
• J
29.8
17.2
36.9
165.0
10.2
10.7
20.6
27.0
22.2
26.6
19.9
30.5
41.3
6.?
4.7
31 .8
26.5
18.6
32.0
a. 6
1 1 .R
16.8
13.2
25.0
12.7
e.2
14.9
22.9
7.1
19.9
7.2
10.7
1 1 .9
0.014
0.007
O.J08
0.105
On ft *
• If U D
0.035
0.014
0.044
0.196
0.012
O.J13
0.024
0.032
0.026
0.032
0.024
0.036
0.049
0.007
0.006
O.J3B
0.031
0.922
0.038
Oil t 4
• U 1 1
0.010
0.014
0.023
0.016
0.030
D. D>S
0.010
0.016
0.027
O.uOB
0.024
0.009
0.013
0.013
NOT USED IN TOTAL NMHC
SYSTCM - CONCENTRATIONS
(C) CONCFNTHAI IONS UCRL CALCULAUII USING VALUES OF
6 FOR THE
PARAFFINS ICONT'O)
CIO* ALKANE
cio* ALKANE
TOTAL AROHATICS.
BfNZENE
TOLUENE
CTHYLBEH7ENE
P-XYLtNE/H-XYLENE
H-ETMYLTOLUENE
1,3,5-TnlHETHVLBENZENE
ISOOUTTLRENZENE
H-DIETHYLBENZEWE
P-OIETHYLBENZENE
C9 AROMATIC
CIO* AROMATIC
TOTAL HALOGENATEO HC
liltl-TRlCMLOROETHANE
1 f 1 |2-IRICHLOROETHANE
UNIDENTIFIED HAL05ENATED HC
UNIDENTIFIED VOCICI
UNIDENTIFIED VOC
UNIDENTIFIED VOC
UNIDENTIFIED VOC
UNIDENTIFIED VOC
PARAFFINS
TOTAL AROHATICS
TOTAL HALOSENATLD HC
UNIDENTIFIED VOC
TOTAL NHHC
'
CALCULATIONS.
NOT USED IK TO'AL NMHC CALCULATIONS.
CARBON NUMBER AND ftb FOR THE MOLECULAR UFITiHT.
13.7
fl.O
7.0
39.0
3^.7
131 .0
11.8
31 .5
44.5
25.0
12.2
4f« 1
12.2
1 .0
2.2
<1 .0
23. a
8.8
19.2
15.1
914. T
405.0
3.2
66. 9
1389.8
0.016
0.010
0.008
0.043
0.0
-------
Finn in no: 4i°TJ
sAiuuc CONTROL no: 4210-25
SAV.PLf TYPE: LIOUIO
DATE SAMPLED:
DATE ANALYZED!
11/29/84
01/31/85
m
IO9
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION
CNf.-C/HL) CHG/LI'
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION
INC-L/HLI (KG/LM
PARAFFINS
N-lltri ANE
N-NOM4NC
N-UNDEC1NE
C6 ALKAI1E
c; UKA-IE
CO ALKANE
C9 ALKA'.'E
C9 ALKANC
C9 ALKAMC
C1 4LKANE
:9 ALKANE
CIO* ALKANE
CIO* AlKAMC
Cin* 1 1 v A ti r
10* A L K • *l L
CI3* ALKANE
CIO* ALKAME
0 C1C* ALKANE
' f|0» AlKANT
GIT* ALKANE
Ctil* ALKANE
CIO* ALKA'.'r
CIO* ALKANE
C1C* ALKAMC
CIO* ALKANE
cio* ALKANE
CIO* ALKANC
CIO* ALKAMT
cio* ALKAME
CIO* AL*A»ir
C1Q. ALKANC
cto* ALKANE
CIO* ALKAHE
C 1 (! » ALKANC
CIO* ALKANC
CIO* ALKtNC
cio* ALKANE
CIO* ALKANE
CIO* ALMf.'E
CIO* ALKANE
(A) AfU|F«rt COMPOUND •
• n> VARIAOLE nrcovE^Y TI
(C) CONfEIITPAJ IONS ULRC
29.7
642.0
351.0
648. f
24.4
64.9
116.0
67.6
50.5
23.4
51.1
62.2
281.0
mn
• 0
405.0
408.0
69.1
533.0
284.0
241.0
449.0
213.0
236.0
80.0
711.0
685.9
243.0
lio.o
362.1
270. Q
115.0
26.5
411.0
79.4
43A.P
154.0
236.0
665.0
0.035
0.763
0.297
0.776
0.029
0.077
0.13A
0.104
0.060
0.028
0.1,61
0.074
0.333
0144
.122
0.480
0.4R4
0.082
0.632
0.337
0.2H6
0.532
0.253
0.2*0
O.Qoj
0.843
0.812
0.288
0.141
0.429
0.320
0.136
0.031
OT A T
* r 0 I
0.487
0.094
0.519
0.1A3
0.280
0.7R9
CONTENTRAI ION NOT USED IN TOTAL NHt'C
'ROUGH DRYING SYSTEM - CONCTNTR AT IONS
CALCULATED USING VALUES OF
6 F3R THE
PARAFFINS (CONTIPI
CIO* ALKANC
CIO* ALKANC
CIO* ALKANC
CrO* ALKANC
CIO* ALKANC
CIO* ALKANC
CIO* ALKANC
CIO* ALKANC
CIO* ALKANC
C1C* ALKANC
CIO* ALKANC
OLCFINS
LIMONENE
TOTAL AROHATICS
ETHYLBCNZENE
P-mCHF/H-XYLENE
ISOPROPTLOEN7ENE
HtCTHYLTOLUCNC
P-ETHYLTOLUCNC
1 t3t5-TRIHETHYLeCNZCNC
OtETHYLTOLUENC
ISORUTYLBCN2CNC
INDAN
H-DICTHYLRCN2CNC
N-.GUTYLDEN7r.NE
CIO* AROMATIC
TOTAL HALOGCNATEO HC
TRICHLOROFLOROMCTHANC
CHLOROFORM
•
CALCULATIONS.
NOT USED IN TOTAL NMHC CALCULATIONS.
CARBJN NUHCER AND R6 FOR THE MOLECULAR UC 1 OUT .
247.0
215.0
190.0
215.0
R73.0
146.0
142C.O
215.0
408.0
112.0
65.0
231.0
44.9
61.6
103.0
799.0
10R.O
516.0
139.0
275.0
166.0
532.0
667.0
427.0
164.0
7.''
0.293
0.255
0.225
0.255
1.035
0.173
1.684
0.255
0.484
0.133
".077
0.262
.
0.050
0.068
0.115
0.869
0.220
0.574
0.155
0.308
0.1B2
0.595
0.746
0.478
I .866IAI
0.074
• UNITS ARE EOU1VALEMT TO PPM ASSUMING A DENSITY OF I.
-------
FIELD ID NO! (H5/LI*
COMPOUND
CONTEMTRATION
•NG-C/ML) (HC/LI*
HC
1M.O
65. f,
71.6
1*569.8
231.0
J92A.9
T.S
261.2
in
lea
0.172
0.07B
0. Jflt
17.287
0.262
4.379
0.074
0.336IC)
19018.0 22.33B
O
(t) 4RTIFATT COMPOUND - CONTENT*AT I ON NOT USED IN TOTAL NHHC CALCULATIONS.
mi vAniAiu.r nr.covEiiv IHROIISC ORYPIG SYSTEK - CONCENTRATIONS NOT USED IN TOTAL NHMC CALCULATIONS.
«r> court NTP AT IONS UERI CALCULAUD USING VALUES OF b FOH THI. CARUON NIIMOER AMD of. FOR THE MOLECULAR UEISMT.
' UNITS ARE EQUIVALENT TO PPH ASSUMING A DENSITY OF I.
-------
Finn in NO: 41974
SAMPLE CONTROL NO: 42IP-26
SAMPLE TYPE: tiouib
DATE
DATL
i i/2<>/e4
02/OI/A5
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION
IN'--C/Ht) IHG/D*
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION
ING-C/KLI CMG/LI*
PARA"
INS
II-HEPTANE 13
?,S-niMETHYLI'EXA»'E 246
J-HETMYLHEPI ANE 14
11-aCTAIIE 11
H-DECANf 305
N-IINtlECAHr 275
C6 A IK AWE 650
Cn ALKAK'E 23
C"> ALKANE
C1 AL
CM*
CIO*
C I 3 *
CM*
CIO*
CM*
CM*
c \ o *
L 1 J •
CM*
n )*
CIO*
CM*
CIO*
CM*
CM*
CIO*
CM*
Cl 3*
CIO*
CIO*
cm*
CIO*
f \ M .
LIU*
CM*
CIO*
rio*
CM*
CIO*
CIO*
M I
(C)
KANE
AL«AUE
ALKANE
ALKANE
ALKANE
ALKA"E
ALKANE
ALKAMf
41 K A M r
w L l\ * iv L
ALKANE
ALKANE
ALKANE
AlKANf
ALKANE
ALKANE
ALKANE
ALKANE
ALKANE
ALKANE
ALKANE
ALKiVf
ALKANC
ALKANC
41 j t\\e
A L ft *Nl
ALKAME
ALKANE
ALKANE
At KANE
ALKANE
ALKANf
ARTIFACT
VAR IAPLE
25
74
33
52
91
c 1
40
196
15
14
9 7
r 1
194
73
115
174
181
219
99
365
192
197
127
38
293
299
118
162
926
1 ?9
4(iO
COMPOUND - CONCENTRATION NOT USED
RECOVERY THROUGH ORYIH3 SYSTEM -
.R
.0
.6
.0
.0
.0
.0
.8
.6
.9
.2
.6
.9
.0
.0
.2
.3
|
• 1
.0
.3
.0
.0
.0
.0
.9
.0
.0
. 0
.0
.7
.0
• 0
A
• 11
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
t
•
•
•
•
016
293
o!7
113
362
326
778
028
030
018
039
062
n 9 (,
V £ a
047
232
PARAFFINS ICONT'O)
CM* ALKAIIE
CIO* ALKANC
CIO* ALKANC
cio* ALKANC
CIO* AI.KANC
CIO* ALKANE
cio* ALKANE
CIO* ALKANC
cio* ALKANE
cio* ALKANE
OLCFINS
n-PlNENE
LIHONENE
177
24
332
156
111
84
176
77
228
4?.
270
59
.0
.2
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.3
.0
.2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.210
.029
.394
.185
.1 32
.101
.209
.091
.270
.050
.306
.067
0.01P
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
•
•
*
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
*
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
017
A X 9
U J<
230
OUT
136
206
215
260
lie
433
22A
IA6
151
046
347
355
140
192
09C
165
569
Od6
IN TOTAL NHMC
CONCENTRAT IONS
CONCENTRATIONS UERL CALCULATED USING VALUES OF
f.
FOR THE
TOTAL AROHATICS
•
BENZENE
ETHYLBTNZEHE
SIFYREME
ISOPROPYLBCNZENC
M-PROPYLBCNZCNC
M-CTHYLTOLUENC
1 t3«5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
0-.ETHYLTOLUENE
H-D1ETHYLOEHZENE
N-nUTYLOrNZENC
P-DIETMYLIIENZENE
CIO* AROMATIC
TOTAL HALOGCNATCO HC
TRICHLOROFLOROMCTHANC
HETMYLEWE CHLORIDE
CALCULATIONS.
NOT USED IN TOTAL NHHC CALCULATIONS.
CAROON NUHHER AND flt FOR THE MOLECULAR UEICIIT.
13
27
37
21
150
128
109
59
142
124
8 (:
59
3
8
.6
.6
.3
.1
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.2
.1
.0
.1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
•
.015
.031
.040
.024
.167
.142
.121
.066
.159
.139
.096
.066
.034(AI
.056
« UNITS ARE EQUIVALENT TO PPM ASSUMING A DENSITY OF 1.
-------
Finn 10 NO: «i<»7«
SAMPLE coriinot HO: *
TYPT: LIOUIP.
DATE SAMPLED: II/T^/M
DATE ANALYZED: 02/01/05
S£
COMPOUND
IINIOCNt IF ItO VOCIC)
voc
irico vuc
into voc
PARAFFINS
TJI»L AROHATICS
TOTAL HALOr-CNATtn MC
IlillOrni IF1CD VOC
TOTAL NHHC
CONCENTRATION
INO-C/ML) IH5/LM
167.0
16.4
31.7
P04B.P
329.2
957.7
6.1
235.1
0.223
0.020
0.03A
9.553
0.374
1.066
0.0*6
0.281(0
9578.9 11.331
COHPOUNl)
CONCENTRATION
ING-C/KLI (MG/LI*
2
O
'At ARTIFACT C?MPOtltin - CONCENTRATION NOT USED IN TOTAL NHKC CALCULATIONS.
(01 VARIAL'tr RtCOVtny THROUGH DRYING SYSTEM - CONCENTRATIONS NOT USED IN TOTAL NHMC CALCULATIONS.
(C) COMCINlfiATIONS UERE CALCULATED USING VALUES OF 6 FOR THE CAflDON NUHCEH AND Kb F"R THE MOLECULAR UEICHT.
• UNITS ARC CniMVALEMT TO PPM ASSUMING A DENSITY OF I.
-------
FIELD in N"
I 41119
SAMPLE CONTROL NO: 42IH-29
SAMPLE TYPE
nupouNn
PARAFFINS
ISOnUIAIIE
N-nUTANf.
S-H'THYLPENTANF
J-'tETHYLHEPTANE
N-OCTANT
C" ALKAME
cn ALKAME
CH ALKANE
C9 ALKANE
CIO» ALKAME
cto» ALKAHE
rin* Aiuitir
LIU* * L ™ * fit.
CIO* ALKAME
cio* ALKANE
cio* ALKAME
r* cio* ALKANE
oo cio* ALKANE
CIO* ALKAME
cio* ALKANE
CIO* ALKAI.'E
cio* ALKAME
CIO* ALKAME
CIO* ALKANE
cio* ALKAME
CIO* ALKANE
cio* ALKANE
CIO* ALKANf
CIO* ALKANE
CIO* ALKANE
cio* ALKANE
en* ALKANE
cio» ALKAME
cio* ALKANE
cio* ALKANE
CIO* ALKAME
cio* ALKANE
cio* ALKANE
cia* ALKAMF
: LIQUID
CONCENTRATION
(NG-C/HLI IHG/LI*
264.0 0.320
391.0 0.473
3930.0 4.705
42<>.0 0.510
624.0 0.742
1140.0 1.356
361.0 0.453
259. ft 0.30R
3920.0 4.651
7290.0 8.645
4430.0 5. 253
K X £. fl A * 1 K 4L
Tl Jo U • U b * J 3 O
4530.0 5.372
46700.3 55.378
86800. 0 102.930
13500. 0 16.009
4190.0 4.969
2280.0 2.704
3200.0 3.795
2510.9 2.916
2940.0 3.486
4710.0 5.505
71100.0 83.127
6750.0 8.004
760.0 0.901
1900.0 2.253
4640.0 5.502
1690.1 2.004
1160.0 1.376
1153.0 1.364
344.0 0.408
3560.0 4.222
?740.0 3.249
1950.0 2.312
27800.0 32.966
2320.0 2.151
890. 0 1.055
904.n 1.072
U) ARTIFACT COMPOUND - CONCENTP AT TDK NOT USED IN TOTAL NHHC
(01 VARIABLE RECOVERY THROUGH DRYING r.YSTEM - CONCENTRATIONS
(C> CONCfNIR ATIONS ULR(. CALCULAICO US INT, VALUES OF 6 FOR THE
DATE
HATE
•
COMPOUND
TOTAL AROMATICS
TOLUENE
P-XYLfNr/H-XYLENE
NiPROPYLBENZENE
M-ETMYLTOLUENE
1,3.5-TRIHETHYLBENZENE
1 .2.4-TRIHETMYLBENZENE
ISOnUTYLBENZENE
li2i3-T«!!HETHYLBrNZENE
CIO* AROMATIC
UNIDENTIFIED VOCICI
UNIDENTIFIED VOC
UNIDENTIFIED VOC
UNIDENTIFIED VIC
UNIDENTIFIED VOC
PARAFFINS .
TOTAL AROHATICS
UNIDENTIFIED VOC
TOTAL NHHC
CALCULATIONS.
MOT USED IN TOTAL NHI'C CALCULATIONS.
CARUON NUHUER AND lib FOR 'HE MOLECULAR
SAMPLED: 11/29/04
ANALYZED: 02/M/ns
CONCENTRATION
(NG-L/HLI IHG/Llo
267.0 0.293
1060.0 1.173
42PO.O 4.763
6690.0 7.446
4120.0 4.5E5
494C.O 5.498
aieU.O 9.148
7910.0 8.881
2090.0 2.337
22900.0 27.353
7340. U 8.767
1680.0 2.107
661.0 0.790
•
32843*. 0 389.550
31607.0 44.125
32581.0 38.916(CI
400624.0 472.591
WEIGHT.
. 1INIIS ARC rOUIVALENT TO PPH ASSUMING A DENSITY OF 1.
-------
nun in NO: 4jn»p
SAMPLE cnninoL HC: 421P-30
SA»PLF TYPE: utcuin
OATC SAMPLED:
DATE ANALYZED:
1 1/29/04
C2/06/8D
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION
(N'.-C/HL) IHG/D*
COMPOUND
'CONCENTRATION
(N3-C/ML> 5
0.377
Of. O *T
• 627
1.968
0.272
0.796
0.310
3.688
2.893
1.47Q
1.B14
1 .423
1.743
5. 870
2.6PO
11 T O
• r / "
0.695
4.506
4.743
1.163
0.830
PARAFFINS «CONT*D)
CIO* ALKANC
CIO* ALKANE
cio* ALKANE
CIO* ALKANc
CIO* ALKANC
CIO* ALKANC
CIO* ALKANC
CIO* ALKANC
CIO* ALKANC
CIO* ALKANE
CIO* ALKANC
CIO* ALKANC
CIO* ALKANC
CIO* ALKANC
CIO* ALKANC
CIO* ALKANC
CIO* ALKANC
CIO* ALKANC
OLCFINS
1-HCXEME
C-2-HCXCNC
1-OCTCHE
4«NONENC
B-PINCNC
liDCCENr
LiHonrNC
liUNOCCCUE
CIO* ALKENC
cio* ALKENC
TOTAL AROMATICS
ETHYLOEN'ZCNE
PiVYLENE/H-XYLCN!:
STYRENF
O-XYLENE
1SOPROPUBCN7CNC
1260.0
894.0
935.0
2250.0
340.0
5520.0
11 10.0
1670.0
8660.0
1260.0
611.3
207.0
661.0
3330.0
179C.O
5270.0
1600.0
1700.0
1530.0
107.0
159.0
1170.0
441C.O
701 .0
1000.0
794.0
146.0
1930.0
667.0
1570.0
813.0
517.0
260.0
1.494
1.060
1 .109
2.668
0.403
6.546
1.316
l.°flO
10.269
1.494
0.725
• 0.245
0.7P.4
3.949
2.123
6.249
1.697
2. 016
1.789
0.125
0.186
1.367
5. (105
0.820
1.135
0.928
0.173
2.256
0.738
1 .737
0.002
0.572
0.269
(A) ARTIFACT COMPOUND - CONCCNTRATION NOT USED IN TOTAL NMHC CALCULATIONS.
(fl) VARIAfUE RlCOWf.PY THROUGH DRYING SYSTEM - CONCENTRATIONS NOT USED IN TOTAL NMHC CALCULATIONS.
•C) CONCENTRATIONS WERE CALCULATED USING VALUES OF 6 FOR THE CARBON NUMRER AND P6 FOR THE MOLECULAR UCIGHT.
•**•
a
z
ARE fOUIVALCNT TO PPM ASSUMING A DENSITY OF I.
-------
firi.n in MO: 4i9eo
CONTROL NO: 4?1P-30
IYI>I: Liomn
DATE SAMPLED:
DATE ANALYSED:
11/29/P4
02/of./f>5
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION
INS-C/HL) (H3/D*
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION
JNG-C/HLI IMG/D*
IMAL AKOHATICS (fONT'O)
N-fROPYLPENMNE
I1-ET"YLT?LUEUE
TN | :U THYLFENZENE
r tin AN
"-nil THYLPCN7CNC
C»0« AROMA I 1C
C10« ARJHATIC
TT!»L MAL03EHA1EO HC
TRICHLOnOCTMYLE'lE « PROHOO 1CHLORCHE THANE
IKJIOCMTIFICO VOCCC)
TIFIro voc
iminrunncn voc
p»n AFF IN";
urn MS
T3TAL AROCATICS
TllAL HAlCJENATEn HC
UNlOiMliriED VOC
T3TAL NHMC
?3flO.O
lf-JO.0
lfl?0.0
917.0
(56.0
M60.0
1 170. P
1290.0
1770.0
3370.0
3.8
2.149
1.814
2.026
1.021
0.718
1.633
1.308
1.443
1.924
3.769
0.021
309.0
420.0
84715.5
11949.0
21240.0
3.R
929.0
0.608
0.502
100.524
13.785
22.521
0.021
I.IIO(C)
117877.3 137.961
(A) ARTIFACT CC"POUNO - CONCENTRATION NOT IISF.n IH TOTAL NHHC CALCULATIONS.
cm VAHIAHLE RtcnvfY TimouGH onvi"s SYSTEM - CONCENTRATIONS NOT USED IK TOTAL NHHC CALCULATIONS.
-------
ricin 10 NO:
SAMPIE CONTROL KC: 42if»-47
SAMPLE TYPE: LIOUIC
DATE SAMPLED!
DATE ANALYZED:
01/.M/85
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION
ALKCNC
TOTAL AROHATICS
P-XYLCNC/M-XYLENE
ISOPROPYLDCNZCNC
P-CTHYLTOLUCMC
l«3fS-TRIME!HYLBCNZCNC
0-ETHYLTOLUENE
1 •2f4-T"IHCTHYLBCNZCNC
H-DICTHYL9CNZCNC
P-OIETHYLnENZENE
CIO* AROMATIC
TOTAL HALOGCNATCD HC
Itl-DICHLOROCTHYLCNC
UNIDENTIFIED VOCIO
UNIDENtiriEO VOC
UNIDENTIFIED VOC
UNIDENTIFIED VOC
UNIDENTIFIED VOC
CALCULATIONS.
NOT USED IN TOTAL NIHIC CALCULATIONS.
CARRON NUMBER AND fl6 FOR THE MOLECULAR UflMiT.
284.0
150.0
51". 0
279.0
708.0
405.0
284.0
149.0
699.0
205.0
26.6
399.0
37.8
232.0
27". 0
113.0
35.8
285.0
180.0
73.3
5.0
324.0
62.2
9'. 5
23". 0
0.337
0.178
0.614
0.331
O.P40
0.48U
0.337
0.1 74
0.793
0.233
0.031
0.441
0.042
0.258
0.309
0.126
0.040
0.319
0.201
0.082
(
0.020
0.387
0.074
0.116
0.281
» UNITS ART romvALrni TO PPM ASSUHINS A DENSITY OF i.
-------
Finn in NO:
SAMPLE CONTROL NO! 4210-47
SAMPLE TYPC: LIOUIO
D*TC SAMPLED:
OATL AMLYZEO:
COMPOUND
PARAFFINS
3LEMNS
DIAL AROMATICS
TOTAL HAL03F.NATFO
UNIDENTIFIED VOC
TOTAL
CONCENTRATION
(NH-C/Hl) IMG/LI*
COMPOUND
CONCtNTRATIOH
ING-C/HLJ (HQ/LI*
HC
14651.0
1079.6
1633.9
718.7
Ifl088.2
I7.3AR
1.231
1.819
0.020
O.B5BICI
21*317
O
(A) ARTIFACT COMPOUND - CONCENTRATION NOT USED IN TOTAL NHHC CALCULATIONS.
mi VARIAfur REroVEPY THROUGH ORYlriC SYSTEM - CONCENTRATIONS NOT USED 1M TOTAL NMHC CALCULATIONS.
(0 COIICENTRAIIONS WERE CALCULATED USINS V-LUES Of 6 FOR THE CARBON NUHtER AND 66 FOR THE MOLECULAR WEIGHT.
. UNITS ARE EQUIVALENT TO PPM ASSUHIN3 A DENSITY OF I.
-------
LO
FILL!) 10 HOS 41"»8
SASPlf CONTROL It".'. 42»'
SAMPLE TYPE: LIOUIP
OAT?: SAMPLED:
OAU AIIALYZCO:
01/30/15
CONCENTRATION
COMPOUND
PARAFFINS
V-HETMYLMEPTAHC
N-II'IOECANE
C7 ALKANE
cn ALKANE
C"» ALKAME
C9 ALKAHE
C"» ALKAMf
CIO* ALKANE
rin* A i u A M r
x-iu~ A i. R ^ M i
CIO* ALKANE
CIO* ALKANE
CIO* ALKAHC
CIO* ALKAHE
Cn* ALKANE
CIO* ALKAME
r* i A * 1 1 w A u r
LI'J**l.l\*NI.
C19* ALKANE
C11» ALKANE
C|0» ALKANE
CIO* ALKANC
CIO* ALKANE
CIO* ALKAME
cn* ALKANE
cio* ALKAME
CIO* ALKANE
C|C» ALKANE
CIO* ALKANE
CIO* ALKANE
CIO* ALKANE
CI9* ALKANC
r i ft * A i K AM r
U I U * A I. r\ A I* t
C|0« ALKANE
CIO* ALKANE
Clfl* ALKANE
CIO* ALKANE
CIO* ALKAMf
CIO* ALKANr
cio* ALKAIIE
CI1* ALKAHE
(A> ARTIFACT COMPOUND
IP) VAR (ABLE RECOVERY
-------
FIELD ID NO:
SAM«UE CONTROL NCI
SAMPLE TYPE: LIQUID
DATE SAHPLED! 11/21/M
DATC ANALYZED: DI/JO/AS
M
COMPOUND
UNIDENTIFIED VOC fCOHT'OMCI
IINIUEHTIFIEI) VOC
PARAFFINS
OLEFI'lS
TOTAL AROHATICS
T1TAL HAL3GENAIED I'C
UNIOCXI IF IED VOC
TOTAL NHMC
CONCENTRATION
IN-i-C/MLI
-------
rmn in NOS
SAMPLE CONTROL NO: 43111-49
SAMPLE IVPC: LIOUID
DATE SAMPLED:
OATI ANALYZED:
i
02/06/RS
CONCENTRATION
COMPOUND
PARAFFINS
NE3HEXAHC
•J-HEXANE
MCIMYLCYCLOPENTANF
H-MEPTAHE
ME'llYLCYCLOMEXANE
2,1-DIMf IHYLMEXANE
2i?i5-TR|METMYLHEI'ANr
N-HONANC
N-OECANE
•J-UHDECAHE
C7 ALKANE
CP ALKANE
CB AL.KANE
ct ALKANE.
CR ALKANE
Cfl ALKANE
CO AlKANf
C9 ALKAHE
| C9 ALKAMC
i_j P Q 4 1 rf A hi f
• ^ LI * L n * " L
01 C9 ALKANE
C1 ALKANE
C9 ALKANE
C9 ALKANE
CIO* ALKA'JE
Clo* ALKANE
cio* ALKANE
CIO* ALKANE
CIO* ALKAKE
CIO* ALKANE
CIO. ALKAKT
CIO* ALKAHE
CIO* ALKANC
CIO* ALKANE
flO* ALKANE
CIO* ALKANE
CIO* ALKANE
(NG-C/HLI
•
26.7
152.0
26.6
146.0
40.4
639.il
296. 0
1040.0
9130.0
1620.0
22.0
77.6
2120.0
?36.1
296.0
1 160.0
1450.0
956.0
776.0
2950 » 0
4R60.0
294.0
5690. C
1710.0
4510.0
4020.0
17900.0
9570.0
"190.0
2860.0
2510.0
t c n n n
1 D U U • U
2060.0
3140.0
M3.0
• 9 o n A n
1 Z "0 0 . 0
7233.0
1460.3
IMG/LI*
0.032
0.1*>2
0.031
0.174
0.047
0.760
0.396
1.235
6.083
1.918
0.026
0.092
2.522
0.2RI
0.3->2
1.3/10
1.723
1.136
0.922
3C H 4
• O 3 ^
5.773
0.349
6.760
2.031
5\ g. A
• J O U
S.34R
4.767
21.226
11.348
10.99P
3.391
2.976
Jt 14
• t * *
2.443
3.724
0.727
t R. 4 O T
1 3 • 2 " »
P. 574
1.731
COMPOUND
PARAFFINS (CONT'OI
CIO* ALKANE
CIO* ALKANE
CIO* ALKANE
CIO* ALKANE
CIO* ALKANC
CIO* ALKANE
CIO* ALKANC
CIO* ALKANE
CIO* ALKANC
CIO* ALKANE
CIO* ALKANE
CIO* ALKANE
CIO* ALKANC
CIO* ALKANE
CIO* ALKANC
CIO* ALKANC
CIO* ALKANC
OLCFINS
1-OCTCNE
CIO* ALKENE
TOTAL AROHATICS
TOLUENE
0-XYLEHE
N-PROPYLBENZENC
lt2i3-TRIHETHVLBEN2CNE
CIO* AROMATIC
TOTAL OXYSENATCD HCIBI
MEXANAL
UNIDENTIFIED VOCIC)
UNIOCNTIFIED VOC
UNIDENTIFIED VOC
CONCCNTRAT ION
INO-C/KLI
5000.0
1P.30.0
15RO.O
1320.0
2530.0
3710.0
1350.0
1490.0
5200.0
3470.0
1450.0
649.0
1 140.0
3980.0
1470.0
26H.O
952.0
315.0
14500.0
1990.0
1270.0
2233.0
7B5C.O
2780.0
256.0
263.0
590.0
(MS/LI •
5.929
2.170
1.P74
1.565
3.00k
4. 199
1.601
1.767
6.166
4.115
1.719
0.770
1.352
4.720
1 .743
0.31B
1.129
0.36B
16.953
2.182
1.405
2.4R2
fl.737
3.109
0.356
0.314
0.705
m
F
0
in
H
Z
•UB
(A) ARTIFACT COMPOUND - CONCENI«AT 1 ON NOT USED IN TOTAL NMMC CALCULATIONS.
(B> VARIABLE REfOVERY IMROUOH DRYING SYSTEM - CONCENTRATIONS NOT USED.Ill TOTAL NMHC CALCULATIONS.
1C) CONCENTRATIONS UlRE CALCIILAUO USIN3 VALUES OF b FOR THE CARBON NUHCTR AND R6 F01 THE MOLECULAR WEIGHT.
. UNITS ARE EOUIVALENT TO PPM ASSUMING A DENSIIY IF 1.
-------
FIELO 10 NO:
SAMPLE CONTROL NO: *;
SAMPLE TYPE: LIOUIP
DATE SAMPLED: n/™/n»
DATE ANALYZED: 02/06/as
COMPOUND
iricn vuc «ciN»»n»ici
CONCENTRATION
IN---C/HL) *
COHPOUNO
CONCENTRATION
(HS-C/M) (HG/LI*
voc
IINIOENI into voc
S92.0
7370.0
0.107
3.031
ID
10
'5
3LCri««S
OML AROP.tTICS
TOTAL OXYGCNAICO HC
IMIOTNT IF I £0 VOC
TOTAL NHIIC
I5J086.3 1«1.63B
MStS.O
16120.0
256.0
3815.0
17.321
17.91*
0.356IU)
4.5S7IC)
M7R36.3 221.430
n
M
o\
(A) ARTIFACT COHnoiINO - COMCf MTP«I IOM NOT USfO IN TOTAL NHI'C CALCULATIONS.
Mil VARIAIHF RCCOVEPY THPOUGH OnVING SYSTEM - CONCENTRATIONS NOT USED IN TOTAL NHMC CALCULATIONS.
•Cl COHCEN1RA1IONS UCHE CALCULATE USING VALUES OF 6 FOR THE CAROON NUHfER AND Pb FOR THE MOLECULAR UEISHT.
• UNI IS ARC rOIIIVALFNT 10 FPH ASSUMING A DENSITY OF I.
-------
FIELD 10 NO! 41994
SAHfM.e CONTROL NC: 42M-50
SAMPLF TYPES Liouin
DATE SAMPLED:
OATC ANALYZED:
ll'30/IM
01/30/85
COMPOUND
PARAFFINS
ti-nilTANE
3-Mr IHYLPENTANF
N-HCXANE
2.2I4-TRIMETHYLPENTANE
J-MFTHYLHEPTANF
N» i f\ it 1 1 1 r
N U if * 14 L
N-DECANF
C6 ALKANE
Cfl ALKANE
C9 ALKANE
C9 ALKANE
ce ALKANE
cio* A'LKANE
CIO* ALKANE
CIO* ALKANE
CIO* ALKAME
CIO* ALKANE
CIO* ALKANE
C I1« ALKANE
CIO* ALKANF
CIO* ALKAHC
CI3* ALKANE
CIO* ALKANE
CIO* ALKANE
CIO* ALKANF
CONCENTRATION
(NG-C/HLI (IIG/L>»
'
20.2
156P.O
49.1
(•0.4
16.5
* o n
re • D
13.8
11.9
3 \ &
K >J * O
167.0
169.0
510.0
106.0
47/.B
57.3
32.5
253.0
*>80.0
88. 8
42.7
64.5
30.9
113.0
168.0
101.0
O.J24
1.068
0.059
0.072
0.020
Oil t A
. U 1 4
0.034
0.017
0.014
On 9 A
• U £ O
0.198
0.201
0.606
0.126
0.057
0.068
0.039
0.302
0.61B
0.105
O.OM
0.076
0.037
0.134
0.199
0.127
COMPOUND
TOTAL AROMATICS ICONT'O)
li2t4-TRIHETHYLBEMZENE
INDAN
NAPHTHALENE
TOTAL HALOGENATED HC
Itl-DICHLOROETHYLENE
UNIDENTIFIED VOCIO
UNIDENTIFJED VOC
PARAFFINS
OLCFINS
TOTAL AROMATICS
TOTAL HALOGENATED HC
UNIDENTIFIED VOC
TOTAL NHHC
CONCENTRATION
(NG-C/KL) (HG/LI*
179.0
tino.o
5410.0
4.0
399.0
438*^.1
1380. 0
8057.9
4.0
391.0
14226.0
0.199
1.29)
5.780
O.P16
0.477
5.221
1 .566
6.687
O.C16
0.477(C)
15.967
n
ft
DO
P
SI
•""
3LEFINS
I I HONE HE
13TAL AROMATICS
PEN7ENE
IOLUCME
P-XYLFNE/M-XYLFNE
M-LTMYLT.lLllENf
I f3»5-TB
1380.0
294.0
399.0
254.0
I5l>.0
114.0
69,9
1.566
0.319
0.437
0.281
0.1 75
0.127
0.078
(A) ARTIFACT COMPOUND - CONCENTRATION NOT IJSEO IN TOTAL NMHC CALCULATIONS.
(01 VADIAOLE fUCnVCPY THROUGH OHYIN3 SYSTEM - CONCENIftAT IONS NOT USTD IN TOTAL NHHC CALCULATIONS.
(Cl CONCCNIWATI3NS UtRL CALCULATED USING VALUES OF f, TOO TH£ CARBON NUMBER AND 06 FOR THE MOLECULAR UEIGHT.
UNITS M«r rQUtVALTNT TP PPM Ar.SUMIMC A IICNSIlY OF I.
-------
FIELD 10 NO: 42000
SAMPLE CONT10L NO: 4218-52
SAM°LE TYPE: uouin
DATE SAMPLED!
DATE ANALYZED:
11/30/84
01/31/85
II
m
Ea
&
2
o
00
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION
ftCi-C/NLI '
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION
(NG-C/HL) (HG/D*
PARA'FINS
N-PENTANE
.NCOHEXA»'E
CYCLOPENTANE
N-HEXANE
HCTHYLCYCLOPENTANF
M-HErT«"£
"ETHYLCVCLOHEXANE
3-MrTHYLHEPTANE
N-NONANE
N-OECAME
C1 ALKANE
C"» ALKAMr.
C9 ALKANE
CO ALKANr
f Q A i t/ A fcif*
w 7 H UK A « L
CIO* ALKANE
cio* ALKANE
CIO* ALKANT
r 1 A A AltfAMf
L 1 9 * A L K « IV L
ClI* ALKANE
CIO* ALKANE
C1P* ALKANE
cio* ALKANC
CIO* ALKA»'E
CIO* ALKANE
CIO* ALKANC
no* ALKANE
C1P* ALKANE
CIO* ALKANE
CIO* ALKAK'E
Cl?» ALKANE
CIO* ALKANE
CIO* ALKANE
OLEF1"S
A-PINTNE
LIHONENE
124.0
200.3
29.4
26.7
43.4
36.7
54.8
224. a
19R.Q
102.0
77.6
241.0
484.0
«64.Q
At 1
n i • J
692. C
100.0
101.0
"t 1 9 A
1 1 C • 0
127.0
318.0
5290.0
239. C
486.0
2860.0
.'.91.0
?f 0. 0
51.2
156.0
85. 2
899.0
T260.0
33.3
273.3
170.0
0.149
0.23"
0.034
0.0?2
0.0-51
0.044
0.064
0.266
0.235
0.121
0.386
0.286
0.575
1.026
Oft Q t
• U 7 D
0.321
0.119
0.120
On A A
• n i S
0.151
0.377
6.273
0.283
0.576
3.415
0.464
0.3J8
0.061
0.185
0.101
1.066
P. 409
0.039
0.310
0.202
IA) ARTIFACT COMPOUND - CONCENTRATION NOT USED IN TOTAL NMHC
(B) VARIABLE niTOVf«V THROUGH DRYIN6 SYSTLH - CONCINTP AT IONS
(C) CONCENTRATIONS WERE CALCULA1EO USINP- VALUES OF t FOR THE
TOTAL AROMATIC?
BENZENE
TOLUENE
ETHYLOENZENE
P-XYLENE/M-XYLENE
0-XVLENE
M-ET"YLTOLUENE
P-ETHYLTOLUENE
l*3i5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE
INOAH
IMDENC
N-BUTYLBENZENE
NAPHTHALENE
TOTAL OXYGENATED HC(B)
ACETONE
UNIDENTIFIED VOC(C)
UttlDENTIFIED VOC
UNIDENTIFIED VOC
PARAFFINS
OLEFINS
TOTAL AROMATICS
TOTAL OXYGENATED HC
UNIDENTIFIED VOC
TOTAL NHHC
CALCULATIONS.
NOT USED IN TOTAL NMHC CALCULATIONS.
CARBON NUMBER AND Pf. FOR THE MOLECULAR WEIGHT.
751.0
872.0
447.0
P78.0
394.0
389.0
310.0
440.0
1270.0
1700.0
598.0
101.0
1370.0
420.0
36.2
22862.3
451.0
8150.0
1370.0
45f .2
31919.5
0.815
0.956
0.494
0.971
0.436
0.433
0.345
0.490
1.390
1.E29
0.669
0.108
2.P11
0.502
0.043
27.119
0.512
8.936
2.21KB)
0.545(C>
37.111
UNITS ART rnulVALCUT TO PPM ASSUMIN5-A DENSITY OF I.
-------
Finn in no: 42001
SAMPLE CONTROL N?: 4218-53
SAMPLE TY»C: LIQUID
DATE SAMPLED:
DA»E ANALYZED:
11/30/84
02/06/85
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION
UI'5-C/ML) Ch-,/D*
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION
(NG-C/HL) (HG/Lt*
PARAFFINS
ISOPEMTANE
NEOHEXANE
3-MCTHYLHEXANE
2i'S-DIHf THVLHEXANE
3-METHYLHEPTANE
M-OCT»W«:
. N-MO'IANr
N-UMDECANE
C" ALKAHE
C« ALKANE
CB ALKASF
CR ALKANf
C9 ALKAVE
C<> ALKANE
C9 ALKANE
f- n All/A hi C*
L " A L i> A NL
C9 ALKANE
C9 ALKANC
C9 ALKANE
CIO* ALKANE
C19* ALKAKE
CIO* ALKANE
cio* ALKANE
"CIO* ALKANE
CIO* ALKANE
CIO* ALKANE
CIO* ALKANE
CIO* ALKANE
CIO* ALKANE
CIO* ALKANE
P 1 1 A A I t/ A M P
L13* ALKAVT.
:i?» ALKAME
C19* ALKANE
CIO* ALKANE
CIO* ALKANE -,
i i
,
(A) ARTIFACT COMPOUND -
60.3
55o.O
949 . ?
»7.4
487.0
1400.0
1300.0
673.0
• 133.0
67.2
61.9
150. n
26?.?
706.0
4120.0
A £. ft A
u D U • U
1460.0
1150.0
3430.3
10300. 0
6020. 0
345.0
2C10.0
1030.0
549.9
1670.0
999.«
1190.0
lic.0.0
1473. U
B t « ft
UD 1 • U
36PO.O
674.0
• 2700.0
i £ & ft n
1 OD U • U
, 666.0
.
CONCENTRATION NOT USED IN
0.073
0.66<«
1.132
0.056
0.579
1 .465
1 .544
0.797
0.15ft
0.0»0
0.074
9.1 70
".312
0.839
4 .U94
Ift 9 5
• U c £
1.734
1.366
4.975
12.214
7.139
0.646
2.384
2.346
0.6*1
1.9PO
1 .IBS
1.411
2.312
1.743
Of fit
• aha
4.293
0.799
3.292
1Q f. A
. 7O 0
0.790
TOTAL NMHC
(B) VARIABLE RECOVERY THROUGH DRYING SYSTEM - CONCENTRATIONS
DIETHYL ETHER
ISOnUTYRALDEHYOE
VALERALOEHYOE
3-P£NTANONE . ' .
i
CALCULATIONS.
NOT USED I'l TOTAL NMHC CALCULATIONS.
CARBON NUMBER AND Ob FOR THE MOLECULAR UEIGHT.
306.0
423.0
44.7
608.0
5200.0
1590.0
7650.0
3170.0
3 8 7 . C
67.4
518.0
10900.0
906.0
149.0
252.0
3390.0
1610.0
1970.0
15700.0
997.0
1360.0
2810.0
14200.0
12000.0
2140.0
19.3
1960.0
203.0
635.0
422.0
0.358
0.412
0.052
0.944
6.077
1.958
8.683
3.598
0.452
0.102
0.605
12.744
1.059
0.162
0.276
3.750
1.7R1
2.179
17.474
1.110
1.514
3.143
15.880
13.420
2.286
0.220CA)
3.026
0.305
0.911
0.606
. UNITS ARF EOUIVALENT TO PPM ASSUMING A DENSITY OF 1.
-------
FIELD in NO: 4?oai
SAMPLE CONTROL NO: 421R-S3
SAMPLE TYPE: LIOUIO
DATE SAMPLED:
DATE ANALYZED:
11/30/94
oz/os/es
in*
COMPOUND
T3T*L OXYGENATED HC (CONT'OMB)
HEXAMAL
UNIOENT1FIEO VOCCC)
UNIDENTIFIED
UNJOF»JTIF| ED
•UNlOcNTinED
UNIDENTIFIED
UN10LNTIF1ED
UNIDENTIFIED
UNIDENTIFIED
VOC
VOC
VOC
VOC
VOC
V5C
PARAFFINS
OLEFPlS
TOTAL AROHATKS
TOTAL HALOGENATEO HC
TOTAL OXYGENATED HC
UNIDENTIFIED VOC
TOTAL NMHC
CONCENTRATION
(N-J-C/ML)
-------
FIELD 10 NO: 41M-S
CONTSCL no: 42i»-4i
IVPC: Ltnuin
r. SAMPLED: n/?9/u4
DATE ANALYZED: oi/Ji/ns
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION
(NG-C/HL) tHG/L)'
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION
«NO-C/HL» IMG/L»«
PARAFflNS
N-HCMANE
rYCLOiir XANE
N-OCTAHC
C7 AtKANC
Cn ALKA'lf
C9 ALKANE
CM* ALKANC
TOTAL AROMATICS
f-DlETHYLPENZENC
013* ANOHATIC
TOTAL HALor.ENATEO HC
METHYLfNE CHLORIDE
1 I I • I-TR ICMLOROETMAMr
TR ICIILOROC TMYLCHC « BR OHOD ICHLOR CMfTHAHE
tETRACCLOROrTHYLENE
II^IOENT IFIED VOCIC)
UNIDENTIFIED VOC
MC
TOIAL AROHATICS
TOTAL HALOSENATTD
UN I DC 'IT IFIED VOC
TOTAL NHMC
IOB.O
4.2
5.6
12.P
II .9
60.2
18.4
21.1
32.A
3.1
5.2
92.2
12.1
0.129
0.00%
O.OOT
a.015
C.OM
0.072
0.022
0.024
0.036
0.022
O.C29
0.505
O.OB4
s
4.3
221.1
93.4
112.6
4.3
391.4
0.005
0.264
0.060
0.640
0.005CC)
0.96B
(A) ARTIFACT COHPQIIMO - CONCENTRATION NOT USED IN TOTAL NHMC CALCULATIONS.
(Ill VARIAHir RlCOVfRY TI'ROUjH DRYING SYSTEM - CONCENTRATIONS NOT USED IK TOTAL NHMC CALCULATIONS.
1C) COIICENTRATIONS UERE CALCULATED USING VALUES OF 6 FOR TML CAHOON NUMBER AND R6 FOR THE MOLECULAR bEIGHT.
• UNITS ARE EOIJIVALTNT TO FPM ASSUMING A DENSITY OF 1.
-------
FIELD in NO: 41RB6
SAMPLE
SAMPLE
CONTROL
ivpr :
NO:
421R-42
DATE SAMPLED: 11/29/34
DATE ANALYZED: oi/3i/as
Lioum
COHPOUIID
1'ARAFFINS
N-OCTANE
C7 ALKANE
Cn ALKANE
cn ALKANE
C* ALKAHE
CT ALKANF
C|n« ALKANE
10TAL MALOGENATED HC
MEIHYLENE CHLORIDE
I .1 t I-1R ICIILOROtTMANr
TniCHLORCETHYLENE « PROMODICHLOROMETHANE
lEinACHLOROEIIIYLENE
IIMIOCNI 1FI CO MALOGENATED HC
PARAFFINS
fOTAL HALOGENATED HC
(OTAL NHHC
CONCENTRATION
(NS-C/HL) (Hpi/L)«
CONFOUND
CONCENTRATION
(NG-C/HL) (HG/LI*
ca
10.0
55.4
16.9
14.A
11.4
19.7
3.0
5.4
87.2
13.2
134.9
109.7
244.6
0.007
0.013
0.366
0.020
0.016
0.014
0.323
0.028
0.030
0.477
0.091
<1.003
0.160
0.626
0.787
to
•A) ARTIFACI COHPOUlin - CONCENTRATION NOT USED IN TOT*L NMHC CALCULATIONS.
(IU VARIABLE RECOVERY Tl'ROUGH DRYING SYSTEM - CONCENTRATIONS NOT USED IN TOTAL NMHC CALCULATIONS.
(C) CONCENTRATIONS WERE CALCULATED US INS VALUES OF 6 FOR THL CARBON NUMBER AND 116 FOR THE MOLECULAR WEIGHT.
UNI IS ART EQUIVALENT TO PPM ASSUMING A DCH5IIY
-------
nrin 10 M->: «n.so
SAMPLE CONTROL no: . 4?m-i7
E ivi'C: LIOUIP
DATE ANALYZED: 02/01/00
CONCENTRATION
CN'i-C/Kl» (H5/L1*
COMPOUND
CONCENTRATION
JNG-C/ML) CMS/LI*
PARAFFINS
N-IHOECAHE
C6 ALKANF
CA ALKANF
C1 'LKAf/r
CI ALKA'IE
cifl* ALKANE
cio* ALKAME
CIO* ALKANE
CIO* ALKANE
cio* ALKANE
CIO* ALKAMF
CIO* A 1. K A N f
CIO* ALKAHE
CIO* ALKAME
CIO* AI.KANC
CIO* ALKANE
cio* ALKAME
o cio* ALKANE
1 CI3* ALKANE
£5 CIO* ALKANC
CIO* ALKANF
CIJ* ALKANF.
Cll* ALKANE
cio* ALKANE
CIl* ALKAflE
cio* ALKANE
CIO* ALKANE
cio* ALKANE
OLE*" If S
ACEt ONI TRUE
TOTAL AROMATICS
TOLUENE
P-OIETMYLDENZENr
34.4
Tfl.l
51 .6
114.0
31.0
12.3
46. P
44.3
28.6
130.0
51.7
25.7
55.3
19.7
63.0
205. 3
32.1
36. n
93.6
26.3
25.4
32.2
23.1
22.2
51.6
12.4
25.3
136.0
15.5
60.2
183.0
UNIDENTIFIED VOCIC)
O.J41 UNIDENTIFIED VPC
0.014 UNIDENTIFIED VOC
O.U6I
0.135 PARAFFINS
0.046 OLEF1NS
0.015 TOTAL AROHATTCS
0.356 UNIDENTIFIED VOC
0.053
O.u34 TOTAL NHMC
0.154
O.Of 1
0.030
O.J66
O.J23
0.075
0.243
0.03A
0.044
0.111
0.031
0.030
0.03A
0.027
0.026
O.u69
0.015
0.030
0.673
0.021
0.066
0.205
645.0 0.770
20R.O 0.246
2124.5 2.521
15.5 0.021
243.2 0.271
853.0 1.019IU
3236.2 3.P3I
.
(A) APTIFACI COMPOUND • CONCENTRATION NOT USED IN TOTAL NMHC CALCULATIONS.
("1 VARIAHLF RCCOVEPY TI'ROUSH ORYIN'. SYSTEM - CONCENTRATIONS NOT USED IN TOTAL NHHC CALCIIL AT 1 3HS .
1C.) CONCLNIRAT IONS VERL CALCULAIlli USING VALUES 3F t FOR TI'E CAR03N NUMHF.K AND P6 FOR THE MOLECULAR WIGHT.
• UNITS ARE rniMVALFMT TO PPH ASSUMING A DENSITY OF I.
-------
Firio in NO: 4i93i
SAKPLE CONTROL NO: 4218-18
SAMPLE IVPC: nouin
DATE SAMPLED:
DATE ANALYZED:
n/?n/n*
oi/io/ni,
COMPOUND
PARAF-FINS
N-UNOCC1NE
c; ALKAMC
r.t ALKANC
CIO* ALKA'IT
CIO* ALKANf
C|9« ALKAHE
CU* ALKA'IC
CIO* ALKANF
CIO* ALKANC
CIC* ALKANC
CIO* ALKAHC
cio* ALKAHE
CIO* ALKANr
C11* 'ALKANE
Cltl* ALKANE
C|0* ALKANC
OLLFlNS
P-PINE HE
CIO* ALKFME
TOTAL AftOHATICS
OCN7CNC
CTHYLIIC17CNE
N-PROPYLntN7CNE
P-CTHYLTOLUENC
"-ISOPROPYLIOLIIENE
I3IAL MALSSENATEO HC
CONCENTRATION
(NS-C/HLI *
CHlOniOE
UNIDEnriFIED MALOSENATED HC
39.9
35.2
35.7
136.0
14A.O
61 .P
21 .3
227.0
227. C
40.6
46.3
47.9
16.4
59.5
1070.0
35.4
412.0
320.0
40.1
160.0
268.0
79.6
72.8
83. 1
69.6
10.2
2.0
0.043
0.042
0.042
0.161
0.17f
0.073
0.029
0.269
0.269
0.04(1
0.059
0.0-S7
0.019
0.07|
1.269
0.042
0.468
0.374
0.043
0.177
0.296
0.089
0.081
0.190
0.07S
0.072
0.006
COMPOUND
UNIDENTIFIED VOC(C)
••^••••._•**•»»•
UNIDENTIFIED VOC
UNIDENTIFIED VCC
UNIDENTIFIED VGC
UNIDENTIFIED VOC
UNIDENTIFIED VOC
PARAFFINS
OLEFINS
TOTAL AROMATICS
TOTAL HALOGENATED HC
UNIDENTIFIED VOC
TOTAL NHHC
CONCENTRATION
JNO-C/PL) IMS/LI*
29.0
22.2
728.0
12.0
139.0
2244.0
73?.0
770.2
12.2
926.2
4684.6
fra
0.030
0.0?7
O.P70
0.014
0.166
2.661
0.642
0.1)54
0.07B
1.106(0
5.542
(A) ARTIFACT COMPOUND - CONCEN»"AT I ON NOT USED IN TOTAL NHMC CALCULATIONS.
CONCfNTRAT|OHS VCRl CALCULAHO USING VALUES OF 6 FOR IHl CARU3N NUHDER AND Bb FOR THE MOLECULAR UEICHT.
* UNITS ART CnillVALENT TO PFH ASSUMING A DENSITY OF I.
-------
FIELD in NO: 4i°36
SAMPLE CONTROL NO: .4210-19
SAMPLE tYPC: LIOUIP
OATL SAMPLED: ii/?e/84
DATE ANALYZID:
COMPOUND
J-HMHYLPENTAN
C? ALKANE
CO ALKANE
C1 ALKANC
n
to
Cn
CIO*
C|0»
CIO*
C1P«
CIO*
CIO*
cio*
CIO*
CIO*
CIO*
CIO*
CIO*
CIO*
cia*
CIO*
CIO*
CIO*
cia*
CIO*
TOTAL
ALKANE
ALKANE
ALKANE
ALKANE
ALKANE
ALKAHE
ALKAME
ALKALI
ALKANE
ALKANE
ALKANE
ALKANE
ALKANE
ALKANf
ALKA'IE
ALKANf
ALKANE
ALKANE
ALKANE
AROHAT |CS
TOLUENE
CTMVLUEN7ENE
P-XYLEIIE'M-XYLENE
M-ETHYLTOLUENE
l.2i4-TR|H£ThYLPENZENE
NAPMIMALENE
CIO* ARTMATIC
CONCENTRATION
ING-C/HL) IHG/LI*
41.?
109.0
49.7
12.2
164.0
63.6
32.0
61.1
38.7
152.0
75. 6
94.2
111.0
51.5
787. 0
100. u
91.8
316.0
95. 0
67.8
36.0
7.0.2
49.0
34.5
379.0
93.5
79.6
196.0
56.4
107.1
no. 7
22.1
0.050
0.130
0.059
0.315
0.195
0.076
0.038
0.072
0.046
o.ieo
0.090
0.112
0.132
0.0(1
0.933
0.119
0.109
0.375
0.1 13
o.oao
0.043
0.083
0.058
O.U41
0.449
0.103
o.oea
0.217
0.363
0.119
0.066
0.925
COMPOUND
TOTAL MALOSENMtO HC
..^.......___-.__._.
HETNYLTNE CHLORIDE
UNIDENTIFIED VOCIC)
UNIDENTIFIED VOC
PARAFFINS
TOTAL AHOHATICS
TOTAL HALOGENATED HC
UNIDENTIFIED VOC
TOTAL NHHC
CONCENTRATION
ING-C/KL) (HG/L»«
2.5
36.1
3062.1
635.3
2.S
36.1
3756.0
0.017
0.0*3
3.658
0.700
0.017
0.043(0
(A) A"T|FACT COHPOUMP - CONCENTRATION NOT U
-------
FIELD ID NO: 41°37
SAMPLE CONIROL NO: 4210-20
SAMPLE TYPE: uouin
DATE SAMPLED:
DATE ANALYSED:
02/36/nO
CONCENTRATION
COMPOUND
PAR,rF|N,
CVCLOPENTANE
N-HEPI ANE
Ji'i-DIMETHYLI'EXANE
J-ML'TMYLHEPTANE
N-NONANE
N-DECANE
N-UNDECANE
f f ft i it A M r
ID A L « " ~t \
c« ALKANE
en ALKANE
C<) ALKANF
C9 ALKANE
c"» ALKANE
c«» ALK'ANF
cio* ALKANC
C1C* ALKANC
CD* ALKANC
CIA* A I If A M r
111* A I. « * N I.
cio* ALKANE
CIC* ALKAHE
CIO* ALKAME
cio* ALKANE
f* i A A A i v A u i*
LIU* ALnANC.
CIO* ALKAr.'E
CIO* ALKANC
CIO* ALKAME
C13* ALKANC
CIO* ALKANC
CIO* ALKANE
CIO* ALKANE
CIO* ALKANE
CIO* ALKANT
C13* ALKANC
CIO* ALKANE
CIO* ALKANC
CIO* ALKANE
CI1* ALKA'IE
CIO* ALKANC
CI1* ALKANE
(A) ARTIFACT COMPOUND
(HI VARIADLF. RECOVERY
ING-C/PL)
•
18.4
12.2
728.0
37.0
114.3
901.0
54.3
1/.2
58.4
201.0
167. e.
104.4
765.0
206.0
646.0
45. R
34 0*0
309.0
21P.O
200.0
195.0
A q 3 r
1"« • U
443.0
622.0
62.1
80.6
30.7
178.0
305.0
47.0
1130.0
105.0
297.0
27.2
182.0
153.9
45.9
109.0
-------
FIELD 10 NO: M«M?
SAMPLE CONTROL NOt 4218-2?
SAMPLE TYPE: LIQUID
DATE SAMPLED:
DATE ANALYZED:
o
10 COHPOUND
~«l __ „___
•'ARAFFINS
N-liUTANE
NEOHEXANE
N-MCXANE
2 t'l-DIMETHYLPENT ANE
Wn r r d ur
— I'l L A ML
N-IINDCCANE
C7 ALKAME
CT ALKANE
C9 ALKANE
C1 ALKANE
C n A 1 t/ A it r
L * •* L r\ ** N L
ci ALKAHE
C9 ALKANE
CtO« ALKANE
Ct ft *, A 1 K A M 1*
ID* A 1. « ** N I.
CIO« ALKANC
Cin» AtKANE
rm» ALKANC
CIO« ALKAMF
CIO* ALKANE
CIO* ALKANE
CIO« ALKANE
CIO* ALKANE
CIO* ALKANE
CIO* ALKANE
CIO* ALKANE
CIO* ALKANE
cin» ALKANE
CIO* ALKANE
CIO* ALKANE
CIO* ALKANC
CIO* ALKANE
CIO* ALKANE
CI1* ALKAMC
CIO* ALKANE
CIO* ALKANC
CIO* ALKANE
CONCENTRATION
(NG-C/HL)
25.0
97.0
36.3
17.5
ni o
U 1 * C
51. 2
160.0
00.2
H3.0
96.0
K •» n A
3 O U • U
J07.0
162.0
•J^.fl
*> T A
7> * • T '
42.5
3)7.0
52.1
215.0
18.1
156.0
366.0
175.0
2310.0
211.0
122.0
1B3.0
on. 7
1120.0
183.0
42.6
113.0
416.0
57.3
64.3
BO.?
21.9
(I1G/D*
0.030
0.1 16
0.043
0.021
On Q£
• U ^D
0.361
0.200
0.095
0.170
0.114
Of\n
• O Jt U
0.365
0.192
0.112
On t ft
• U o o
0*050
0.376
0.062
0.255
0.057
0.1(15
0.434
0.200
2.739
0.250
0.145
0.217
0.105
1.32S '
0.217
0.051
0.134
0.493
0.060
0.076
0.095
0.026
(At ARTIFACT COMPOUND - COHCENTP AT 1 ON NOT USED IN TOTAL NHHC
(H) VARIAItLF ntcnVFflY THROUGH ORYIfir, -.YSTEM - CONCENTRATIONS
(C) COHCEN1RATIONS UERE CALCULATED USING VALUES OF 6 FOR THE
CONCENTRATION
COHPOUND (NG-C/HL) (HG/D*
TOTAL AROHATICS
BENZENE 22.6 0.025
1 ,2,4-TIUHETHYLBENZENE 155.0 0.173
TOTAL MALOGENATED HC
TRICHLOnOFLOROHETHANE 5.2 0.060CA)
1.1 »2-TR ICIILOROETHANE 5.9 0.033
UNIDENTIFIED HALOGENATED HC 3.0 0.009
TOTAL OXYGENATED HCIB)
BUTANONE 2315.0 3.477
UNIDENTIFIED VOCIC)
UNIDENTIFIED VOC 26.6 0.032
PARAFFINS B331.2 9.BB6
TOTAL AROHATICS 177.6 0.197
TOTAL HALOGENATED HC fl.9 0.042
TOTAL OXYGENATED HC 2315.0 3.477(0)
UNIDENTIFIED VOC 26.6 0.032(0
TOTAL NHHC 8544.3 10.157
-
CALCULATIONS.
NOT USFD IN TOTAL NHI'C CALCULATIONS.
CARBON NUHPER AND P6 FOR THE MOLECULAR WEIGHT.
tea
UNITS ARE EQUIVALENT TO Pf'M ASSUMING A DENSITY OF I.
-------
MELD ID HO: «i«M3 OMC SAMPLED:
SAMPLE CONTROL NO: 42IP-24 DATE ANALYZED! 12/04/fi-i
SAMPLE TYPE: LIQUID
« — — -• — -••--•-•-••• —«••»•••••••••. —•••••••••••._ WMV>._«IV«M« ••••••«. — •••*••• ««_•••«.« • •»••»<••••••••»•»•.*«•. «V«WV« •••»•._••••••»•.»•.••_*•....•»..,»___ ...»•._ _•»•__•»•._«.*•»_«.•..•.••........__..
CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION
COMPOUND (Nr.-C/MLI IHS/D* COMPOUND INO-C/KL) IHC/LI-
(ra
M-OUTANE 26.7 0.032
CYCLOMEXAIIE |9.2 0.022
Cr UKANE 91.4 0.10?
CIO. ALKANE 69.2 0.062
OLEFINS
1-HEXENE 376.0 0.440
C-2-OCTEHE 2ft.4 0.030
TOTAL AROHMICS
____--.____..__
P-VYLENE/M-XYLENE 20.6 0.023
11'iiornTIFIEO vocici
IINIOENTIFIEC VOC 13.9 0.017
PARAFFINS 206.5 0.246
DUriNS 401.4 0.469
TOTAL AROMATICS 20.6 0.023
UNIDENTIFIED VOC 13.° 0.017IC)
TOTAL NMMC
642.4
0.799
(At ARTIFACT COMPOUND - CONCENTRATION NOT USED IN TOTAL NHHC CALCULATIONS.
fill VAHIAIILf NLCOVERY II'ROIISH DRYItIC ^YSTEH - CONCLNTR A T IONS NOT ll-JFO IN TOTAL NHHC CALCULATIONS.
(C> COIICCNIRAT IONS UCRf CALCULATED USING VALUES Of 6 FOR THL CAROOM HUHOER A'JO 116 FOR THE MOLECULAR HEIGHT.
• UNITS ARE F.OUIVALF'IT TO PPM ASSUMING A DENSITY OF 1.
-------
APPENDIX D
ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
D-l
-------
ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
GCA CORPORATION ANALYTICAL PROCEDURE
GC/FIP_Screening of_Agueous Samples
All of the aqueous samples were screened on an HP 5890 GC/FID to determine
the appropriate dilution factor for subsequent GC/MS analysis. One ul sample
aliquots were injected directly into the GC/FID using the conditions described
in the QA Project Plan with the temperature program proceeding to 230°C and
the Helium flow rate at about 30 ml/min. The thirty-seven organic compounds
which were screened by GC/FID are shown in Table D-l. The detection limits
for these compounds ranged from 1 mg/1 to 200 mg/1 owing to the variable
response of the flame ionization detector to these compounds.
Due to the large number of organic compounds screened by GC/FID, sample
analyses were conducted over several days. Subsets of the total number of
compounds were quantified on each day. Analyses were conducted on January 24
and 28, 1985 and February 1, 4, 13, 14, and 15, 1985.
GS/MS Analysis
Following the GC/FID screening, aqueous samples were analyzed using the
purge and trap method (5030 of SW-846) for introducing the sample, or an
appropriately diluted sample, into the GC/MS.
Oil samples were dispersed in polyethylene glycol as described in
Section 7.0 of the QA Project Plan. The dispersed samples were then analyzed
by purge and trap GC/MS.
A 1000 ul headspace sample was withdrawn through the septum of each soil
core and then injected directly into the GC/MS.
All compounds were identified by GC/MS using the conditions described in
the QA Project Plan. GC/MS tuning and calibration checks were performed as
described in the QA Project Plan. Qualitative identification of priority
pollutants was performed using the retention time and spectral matches to
D-2
-------
standards. Quantitative analysis was performed using an internal standard
method of quantitation and a three point calibration curve as described in the
QA Project Plan. These values are reported on the Data Report Sheets
entitled: Purgeables. Additional compounds were identified employing a
forward search of the NBS mass spectral library. Component concentrations for
additional compounds were calculated relative to the closest eluting internal
standard. These values, entered on Data Report Sheets entitled: Qualitative
Compounds, represent approximations due to inherent variabilities in component
response factors in the absence of reference materials.
All data reported are blank corrected using the protocols described in the
QA Project Plan. Detection limits are indicated on each Data Report Sheet.
The GC/FID data for the samples reflect the ability to screen for alcohols
and ethyl aerylate. These compounds are not amenable to purge and trap GC/MS
analysis. Ethylene, aniline and acetonitrile were not included on the list of
targeted compounds.
An estimation of the concentration levels of unidentified volatile organic
constituents was made for each sample. This value was attained by comparison
of the total ion response for the entire sample GC/MS run to the response of
one internal standard. The achieved concentration was then corrected for
blank levels, levels of surrogate and internal standards added to the sample
prior to analysis, and levels of components found in the samples. Results of
this estimation are presented in the attached data summary tables.
In spite of the clean-up procedures applied prior to the use of PEG, some
low level contamination of acetone and methylene chloride were noted. Sample
results were not corrected for this contamination in order to allow the user
to evaluate the blank data.
RADIAN CORPORATION ANALYTICAL PROCEDURE
Radian Corporation employs a gas chromatography/multiple detection (GC/MD)
method which uses three detection systems operated simultaneously. These are
as follows: a flame ionization detector (FID) to detect and quantitate
hydrocarbons, a photoionization detector (PID) to generate toluene -
normalized response factors, and a Hall electrolytic conductivity detector
(HECD) in the halogen mode to provide quantitation and identification of
halogenated compounds. Detailed descriptions of the analytical procedures
required by this method are provided in Radian Corporation's September 28,
1984 document entitled "Protocols For Sampling And Analysis Of Surface
Impoundments And Landtreatment/Disposal Sites For VOCs."
D-3
-------
TABLE D-l. ORGANIC COMPOUNDS SCREENED BY GC/FID ON SAMPLES COLLECTED
Compound
1. Methanol*
2. Methylene chloride
3. Acetone
4. Trichlorofluoromethane
5. 1,1-Dichloroe thane
6. Allyl alcohol*
7. 1,1-Dichloroe thane
8. Trans-l,2-dichloroethene
9. Ethyl ether*
10. Chloroform
11. 2-Butanone
12. 1,2-Dichloroe thane
13. Isobutanol*
14. 1,1,1-Trichloroethane
15. Carbon tetrachloride
16. Dichlorobromome thane
17. 1-Butanol*
18. 1,2-dichloropropane
19. Cia-l,3-dichloropropene
20. Trichloroethene
21. Benzene
Relative Retention
Time to Benzene
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
079
317
342
426
466
512
551
592
612
637
678
684
764
767
790
838
859
922
942
974
00
(continued)
D-4
-------
TABLE D-l. (continued)
Relative Retention
Compound Time to Benzene
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
Trans-1 , 3-dichloropropene
1,1, 2-Trichloroethane
Dibromoch lor ome thane
Hexane*
Ethyl acrylate*
Bromoform
2-Hexanone
4-Methy 1- 2-pentanone
1,1,2, 2-Tetrachloroethane
Toluene
Ch lor obenz ene
Ethylbenzene
Styrene*
m-Xylene
o-Xylene
p-Xylene
1.03
1.03
1.03
1.10
1.14
1.21
1.24
1.34
1.37
1.45
1.53
1.66
1.86
1.88
1.92
1.99
GC Conditions: HP 5890 ft. x 1/8 inch OD column packed with 1% SP-1000
on 60/80 Mesh Carbopack B; Temperature Program: 60°C for 2
minutes, 60°C to 230°C at 10°C/min., then 230°C for 11
minutes; carrier gas: 36 ml Helium/minute; injector
temperature « 230°C.
*Area counts determined for a single concentration standard only. All other
compounds were determined over a dilution series.
D-5
-------
APPENDIX E
RCRA PART A PERMIT PROFILE SHEET
E-l
-------
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY. OFFICE OF SOLID HASTE
HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITY PROFILE
PREPARED BY DEVELOPMENT PLAW!ING AND RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC. (DPRAI
DATA SOURCE> HWDM3 VERSION VI (AS OF 27DEC84)
FOR FACILITY: OK0001824564, AMERICAN AIRLINES INC
DATEI 06FEB85
PAGE! 1
FACILITY! OKD001824564
FACILITY INFORMATION
EPA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER! OK0001824564
FACILITY NAME: AMERICAN AIRLINES INC
MAILING ADDRESS! 3800 N MINGO ROAD
TULSA
EPA REGION:
FACILITY OWNER!
CONTACT PERSON/TITLE!
CONTACT TELEPHONE:
ACTUAL ADDRESS:
DAVISON DARROL VP VP-PPtCH
918/832-3342
3800 N MINGO RD
TULSA
OK 74151
OK 74151
06
CITY OF TULSA AIRPORT AUTHORITY
P.O. BOX 51286
TULSA OK 74151
918X838-5000
FACILITY OPERATOR: AMERICAN AIRLINES INC
PO BOX 61616
7?????????mmmt??m
918/832-3342
TX
W
FACILITY IS A NON-MAJOR HANDLER NOTIFIED UNDER RCRA.
FACILITY IS PRIVATE.
TSDF OWNER IS NOT THE OPERATOR.
EXISTING FACILITY.
NATURE OF BUSINESS DESCRIPTION IS PRESENT.
MAP IS ACCEPTABLE. DRAWING IS ACCEPTABLE. PHOTOGRAPHS ARE ACCEPTABLE.
COUNTY: 143 TULSA
LATITUDE : 36-12-02.5
LONGITUDE: 95-52-02.5
EXISTENCE: 10SEP59
CLOSURE: UNKNOWN DATE
LAST HWDHS UPDATE: 290CT84
INDIAN LAND: NO
NOTIFICATION ACTIVITIES: GENERATION, TREATMENT/STORAGE/DISPOSAL, UNDERGROUND INJECTION WELLS.
SIC CODES:
(01) 3721 AIRCRAFT
DESIGN CAPACITIES:
(01) D79 INJECTION WELL
(031 S02 TANK STORAGE
(02) 3728 AIRCRAFT EQUIPMENT, NEC
(03) 4582 AIRPORTS AND FLYING FIELDS
4,999,999,999.00 GALLONS.
509,000.00 GALLONS.
(02) SOI CONTAINER
(04) T01 TAW TREATMENT
22,000.00 GALLONS.
20,000.00 GALLONS/DAY.
WASTES:
F017 PAINT RESIDUES GENERATED FROM
F009 SPENT STRIP » CLEAN BATH SOLU
F008 SLUDGES FH BOTTOM OF BATH FM E
F007 SPENT BATH SOLU FM ELECTROPLAT
F002 HALO SOLV AND SOLV REC STILL B
F001 SPENT HALO CHLORIDES t SLUDGE
D007 CHROMIUM
0006 CADMIUM
D002 NON-LISTED CORROSIVE MASTRES
D001 NON-LISTED IGHITABLE WASTES
DOOO NON-LISTED TOXIC WASTES
«M FACILITY TOTAL «*
METRIC TONS WASTE PROCESSESS
36.29 SOI
9.07 SOI
13.61 SOI
9.07 SOI
10.89 SOI
68.04 SOI
812,921.05 079 801 S02
38.10 SOI
632,351.97 D79 S02
42.64 SOI S02 T01
9.07 SOI
1,445,509.80
PHASE II VERIFICATION SURVEY:
WASTE PROCESS SIZES!
UNDERGROUND INJECTION WELL:. GALLONS.
STORAGE CONTAINERS: 1,600.00 GALLONS.
STORAGE TANKS: 500,000.00 GALLONS.
THIS FACILITY WAS A TSO OR GENERATOR IN 1981.
«« INFORMATION FOR AMERICAN AIRLINES INC CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE. MM
-------
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, OFFICE OF SOLID HASTE
HAZARDOUS HASTE FACILITY PROFILE DATEt 06FEBS5
PREPARED BY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING AND RESEARCH ASSOCIATES. INC. (DPRA) PAGEi 2
DATA SOURCE: HWOMS VERSION VI (AS OF 270ECfl4) FACILITY: 0X0001824564
PHASE II VERIFICATION SURVEY: (CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS PAGE)
HAZARDOUS HASTE GENERATED IN 1981: 2.00 TONS.
THIS SITE DID NOT RECEIVE HAZARDOUS NASTES GENERATED BY OTHER FIRMS.
DUNS DATA:
SICS: 3721 STARTED: UNKNOWN
AMERICAN AIRLINES INC BUSINESS LINE: UNKNOWN NET HORTHt UNKNOWN
3800 N MINGO ROAD PRINCIPAL OFFICER! R J MASIELLO SALES: UNKNOWN
TULSA OK 74116 PHONE: 918/832-2110 EMPLOYEES: • 5,000
MM NOTE: END OF REPORT FOR FACILITY: OKD001824564. AMERICAN AIRLINES INC N»
w
Co
-------
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY* OFFICE OF SOLID HASTE
HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITY PROFILE
PREPARED BY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING AND RESEARCH ASSOCIATES. INC. (DPRA)
DATA SOURCEi HWDMS VERSION VI (AS OF 27DEC84)
FOR FACILITY! OKD000402396. CHEMICAL RESOURCES INC
DATE: 06FEB85
PAGE: 1
FACILITY! OKD000402396
FACILITY INFORMATION
EPA IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS OK0000402396
FACILITY NAME: CHEMICAL RESOURCES INC
MAILING ADDRESSl 2904 FOURTH NATIONAL BANK BLD6
TULSA
EPA REGION!
FACILITY OWNER!
CONTACT PERSON/TITLEt
CONTACT TELEPHONE!
ACTUAL ADDRESS!
TERRY L FISHER MARKETING
918/582-6994
2700 S 25TH M AVE
TULSA
OK 74119
OK 74107
06
M J LAMBERTON
2904 FOURTH NATIONAL BANK
TULSA OK 74119
918/582-6994
FACILITY OPERATOR!
FACILITY IS A MAJOR HANDLER NOTIFIED UNDER RCRA.
THIS IS A COMMERCIAL FACILITY.
FACILITY IS PRIVATE.
TSDF OWNER IS NOT THE OPERATOR.
EXISTING FACILITY.
NATURE OF BUSINESS DESCRIPTION IS PRESENT.
MAP IS ACCEPTABLE. DRAWING IS ACCEPTABLE.
CHEMICAL RESOURCES INC
2904 FOURTH NATIONAL BANK BLDG
?m?mm??m???TT?m OK ?????
918/582-6994
COUNTY! 143 TULSA
LATITUDE ! 33-07-00.0
LONGITUDE! 96-02>00.0
EXISTENCE! 22MAY73
CLOSURE! UNKNOWN DATE
LAST HMDMS UPDATE! 04DEC84
PHOTOGRAPHS ARE ACCEPTABLE.
INDIAN LAND! NO
NOTIFICATION ACTIVITIES! GENERATION. TRANSPORTATION. TREATMENT/STORAGE/DISPOSAL, UNDERGROUND INJECTION HELL.
TRANSPORTATION MODE(3)i RAIL. HIGHHAY. HATER.
SIC CODES!
101) 4953 REFUSE SYSTEMS
DESIGN CAPACITIES!
(01) D79 INJECTION HELL
(03) T01 TANK TREATMENT
10.000,000.000.00 GALLONS.
140.000.00 GALLONS/DAY.
(02) S02 TANK STORAGE
200.000.00 GALLONS.
HASTES:
U239 XYLENE
U238 URETHANE
U226 1,1,1-TRICHLOROMETHANE »
U220 TOLUENE
U188 PHENOL OR CARBOLIC ACIO.HYDROX
U103 PENTACHLOROBENZENE
U170 4-NITROPHENOL
U169 NITROBENZENE!I.T) OR NITROBENZ
U165 NAPHTHALENE
U162 METHYL METHACRYLATE
U159 METHYL ETHYL KETONE
U154 METHANOL OR METHYL ALCOHOL
U15I MERCURY
U134 HYDROFLUORIC ACID (C.T)
U122 FORMALDEHYDE
NOTE! ONLY THE FIFTEEN LARGEST
METRIC TONS HASTE PROCESSESS
226.80 D79 T01
0.45 079 T01
0.23 079 T01
136.080.00 079 T01
226.80 D79 T01
0.05 D79 T01
0.05 D79 T01
0.05 D79 T01
9.07 079 T01
0.91 079 TOl
90.72 D79 TOl
4.536.00 079 TOl
0.00 079 TOl
HASTES ARE
4.54 D79 TOl
9.07 D79 TOl
LISTED HERE.
INFORMATION FOR CHEMICAL RESOURCES INC CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE.
-------
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY. OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE
HAZARDOUS HASTE FACILITY PROFILE DATEl 06FEB85
PREPARED BY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING AND RESEARCH ASSOCIATES. INC. (DPRA) PAGE: 2
DATA SOURCEI HHDMS VERSION VI IAS OF 270EC84) FACILITY! OKD000402396
HASTES: METRIC TONS HASTE PROCESSCSS (CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS PAGE)
tttt FACILITY TOTAL »• 169,161.78
HASTES WITHOUT AMOUNTS OR PROCESSES!
K063 K066 P035 P050 P055 P090 U224
FINANCIAL DATA:
CURRENT CLOSURE COST ESTIMATE: 135.000. POSTED ON 17FEB84I PRIOR CLOSURE COST ESTIMATE: »0.
CURRENT POST-CLOSURE COST ESTIMATE: «0. POSTED ON UNKNOWN DATEl PRIOR POST-CLOSURE COST ESTI (0.
PHASE II VERIFICATION SURVEY:
HASTE PROCESS SIZES:
UNDERGROUND INJECTION HELL:18000000 GALLONS. .
STORAGE TANKS: 166.000.00 GALLONS.
THIS FACILITY HAS A TSD OR GENERATOR IN 1981.
HAZARDOUS HASTE GENERATED IN 1981: 273.00 TONS.
THIS SITE RECEIVED HAZARDOUS HASTES GENERATED BY OTHER FIRMS.
COMMERCIAL WASTE MANAGEMENT IS THE PRIMARY ACTIVITY AT THIS SITE.
«* NOTE: END OF REPORT FOR FACILITY: OKD000402396. CHEMICAL RESOURCES INC «*
W
-------
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY• OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE
HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITY PROFILE DATEt 06FEBB5
PREPARED BY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING AND RESEARCH ASSOCIATES! INC. (DPRA) PAGEl 1
DATA SOURCEt HWDHS VERSION VI (AS OF 27DEC84) FACILITY! OKD000632737
FOR FACILITY! OKD000632737, HYDROCARBON RECYCLERS INC
FACILITY INFORMATION
EPA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER! OK0000632737 EPA REGION! 06
FACILITY NAME! HYDROCARBON RECYCLERS INC FACILITY OWNER I HYDROCARBOR RECYCLERS
HAILING ADDRESS: 6216 LEWIS 6216 S LEWIS
TULSA OK 74136 TULSA OK 74136
918/742-5586
CONTACT PERSON/TITLE! COWAN TED H
CONTACT TELEPHONE! 918/742-5586
FACILITY OPERATOR! HYDROCARBOR RECYCLERS
ACTUAL ADDRESS! 5300 H 46TH ST S 6216 S LEWIS
TULSA OK 74107 ???????????????JT7?????T? OK ?????
918/742-5586
FACILITY IS A HAJOR HANDLER NOTIFIED UNDER RCRA.
THIS IS A COMMERCIAL FACILITY.
FACILITY IS PRIVATE.
TSDF OWNER IS ALSO THE OPERATOR. COUNTY! 143 TULSA EXISTENCE! 01JUL80
F EXISTING FACILITY. LATITUDE I 36-05-45.0 CLOSURE! UNKNOWN DATE
ON NATURE OF BUSINESS DESCRIPTION IS PRESENT. LONGITUDE! 96-03-15.0 LAST HWDMS UPDATE! 29NOV84
MAP IS NOT PRESENT. DRAWING DATA NOT IN HWDHS. PHOTOGRAPHS DATA NOT IN HWDHS. INDIAN LAND! NO
NOTIFICATION ACTIVITIES! GENERATION, TRANSPORTATION, TREATHENT/STORAGE/DISPOSAL.
TRANSPORTATION HODE(S)! HIGHWAY.
SIC CODES!
101) 2999 PETROLEUM AND COAL PRODUCTS, N (02) 2992 LUBRICATING OILS AND GREASES
DESIGN CAPACITIES!
(01) S02 TANK STORAGE 120,000.00 GALLONS. (02) T04 OTHER TREATMENT 16.800.00 GALLONS/DAY.
WASTES! METRIC TONS WASTE PROCESSESS
F002 HALO SOLV AND SOLV REC STILL B 226.80 S02 T04
0001 NON-LISTED IGNITABLE WASTES 3,628.80 502 T04
«» FACILITY TOTAL «• 3,855.60
WASTES WITHOUT AMOUNTS OR PROCESSES!
F001
COMMENTS!
• on ????T????m??mmtmmTm?m?tm
FINANCIAL DATA!
CURRENT CLOSURE COST ESTIMATE! 15,350. POSTED ON 17FEB84I PRIOR CLOSURE COST ESTIMATE: «0.
CURRENT POST-CLOSURE COST ESTIMATE! *0. POSTED ON UNKNOWN DATEl PRIOR POST-CLOSURE COST ESTI *0.
PHASE II VERIFICATION SURVEY!
WASTE PROCESS SIZES:
THIS FACILITY WAS NOT A TSO OR GENERATOR IN 1981.
HAZARDOUS WASTE GENERATED IN 1981: UNKNOWN TONS.
«* INFORHATION FOR HYDROCARBON RECYCLERS INC CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE. «•»
-------
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY. OFFICE OF SOLID HASTE
HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITY PROFILE DATE: 06FEB85
PREPARED BY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING AND RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC. (DPRAI PAGE: 2
DATA SOURCEt HMOMS VERSION VI IAS OF 27DEC84) FACILITY! OKD000632737
PHASE II VERIFICATION SURVEY: (CONTINUED FROH PREVIOUS PAGE)
•« NOTE: END OF REPORT FOR FACILITY: OKD000632737, HYDROCARBON RECYCLERS INC «**
-------
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY. OFFICE OP SOLID HASTE
HAZARDOUS HASTE FACILITY PROFILE
PREPARED BY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING AND RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC. IDPRA)
DATA SOURCE: HWDH3 VERSION VI IAS OF 27DEC84)
FOR FACILITY: MOD007129935. INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO
DATE! 06FEBB5
PAGE: 1
FACILITY: MOD007129935
FACILITY INFORMATION
EPA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: MOD007129935
FACILITY NAME: INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO
MAILING ADDRESS: PO BOX 1030
JOPLIN
EPA REGION:
FACILITY OWNER:
CONTACT PERSON/TITLE:
CONTACT TELEPHONE:
ACTUAL ADDRESS:
RYLAND HAYNE PLANT MANAGE
417/624-2270
20TH ft RANGELINE
JOPLIN
MO 64801
MO 64801
07
INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY
77 UEST 45TH STREET
NEW YORK
417/624-2270
W
00
FACILITY IS A MAJOR HANDLER NOTIFIED UNDER RCRA.
FACILITY IS PRIVATE.
TSDF OWNER IS ALSO THE OPERATOR.
EXISTING FACILITY.
NATURE OF BUSINESS DESCRIPTION IS PRESENT.
MAP IS ACCEPTABLE. DRAWING IS NOT ACCEPTABLE.
FACILITY OPERATOR: INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY
77 HEST 45TH STREET
??mmmmmmw??
417/624-2270
NY 10036
NY ?????
COUNTY: 097 JASPER
LATITUDE : 37-03-41.0
LONGITUDE: 94-28-34.0
EXISTENCE: 01DEC37
CLOSURE: UNKNOWN DATE
LAST HHDMS UPDATE: 06DEC84
PHOTOGRAPHS ARE ACCEPTABLE.
INDIAN LAND: NO
NOTIFICATION ACTIVITIES: GENERATION. TREATMENT/STORAGE/DISPOSAL.
SIC COOES:
(01) 2491 HOOD PRESERVING
DESIGN CAPACITIES:
(01) 083 SURFACE
(03) S04 SURFACE
IMPOUNDMENT
IMPOUNDMENT
242.400.00 GALLONS.
8.370,000.00 GALLONS.
(021 S02 TANK STORAGE
33.000.00 GALLONS.
HASTES:
K001 BOTTOM SED SLUDGE FM UOOL TREA
«« FACILITY TOTAL «»
HASTES WITHOUT AMOUNTS OR PROCESSES:
P090 U051
COMMENTS:
(90) ANNUAL REPORT RECEIVED 830426
PHASE II VERIFICATION SURVEY:
HASTE PROCESS SIZES:
HAZARDOUS HASTE GENERATED IN 1981:
DUNS DATA:
SICS: 2491
INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO INC
20TH « RANGELINE
JOPLIN MO 64801
METRIC TONS HASTE PROCESSESS
1.36 083 S02 S04
1.36
UNKNOWN TONS.
BUSINESS LINE: HOOD PRESERVING
PRINCIPAL OFFICER: GEROGE TOWNSEND MGR
PHONE: 417/624-2270
STARTED:
NET WORTH!
SALES:
EMPLOYEES:
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
70
MM NOTE: END OF REPORT FOR FACILITY: HOD007129935, INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO «N
-------
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE
HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITY PROFILE
PREPARED BY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING AND RESEARCH ASSOCIATES! INC. (DPRA)
DATA SOURCES HWDMS VERSION VI IAS OF 27DEC84)
FOR FACILITY: MOD007129406, KERR-MCGEE CHEMICAL CORP
DATE: 06FEB85
PAGE: 1
FACILITY: MOD007129406
FACILITY INFORMATION
EPA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: MOD007129406
FACILITY NAME: KERR-MCGEE CHEMICAL CORP
MAILING ADDRESS: PO BOX 2815
SPRINGFIELD
EPA REGION:
FACILITY OWNER:
CONTACT PERSON/TITLE:
CONTACT TELEPHONE:
ACTUAL ADDRESS:
DURHAM C. M. SUPERINTENDENT
417/831-2838
2800 U HIGH ST
SPRINGFIELD
W
VO
FACILITY IS A MAJOR HANDLER NOTIFIED UNDER RCRA.
THIS IS A COMMERCIAL FACILITY.
FACILITY IS PRIVATE.
TSDF OWNER IS ALSO THE OPERATOR.
EXISTING FACILITY.
NATURE OF BUSINESS DESCRIPTION IS PRESENT.
MAP IS ACCEPTABLE. DRAWING IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. PHOTOGRAPHS ARE
07
KERR-MCGEE CHEMICAL CORPORATION
P.O. BOX 25861
HO 65803 OKLAHOMA CITY OK 73125
405/270-2395
FACILITY OPERATOR: KERR-MCGEE CHEMICAL CORPORATION
P.O. BOX 25861
MO 65803 ????????mm?mm?m OK ?????
405/270-2395
COUNTY: 077 GREENE
LATITUDE : 37-14-07.0
LONGITUDE: 93-20-00.0
ACCEPTABLE. INDIAN LAND:
EXISTENCE:
CLOSURE:
LAST HWDMS UPDATE:
01JAN06
UNKNOWN DATE
06DEC84
NO
NOTIFICATION ACTIVITIES: GENERATION. TRANSPORTATION, TREATMENT/STORAGE/DISPOSAL.
TRANSPORTATION MODE(S): HIGHWAY.
SIC CODES:
(01) 2491 WOOD PRESERVING
DESIGN CAPACITIES:
(01) 081 LAND APPLICATION
(03) S04 SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT
WASTES:
K001 BOTTOM SED SLUDGE FM WOOD TREA
*« FACILITY TOTAL »"
COMMENTS:
I 90) ANNUAL REPORT RECEIVED 030426
PHASE II VERIFICATION SURVEY:
WASTE PROCESS SIZES:
HAZARDOUS WASTE GENERATED IN 1981:
DUNS DATA I
SICS: 2491
KERR-MC GEE CHEMICAL CORP
2800 W HIGH ST
SPRINGFIELD MO 65803
1.00 ACRES.
50,000.00 GALLONS.
(02) 302 TANK STORAGE
(04) T01 TANK TREATMENT
12,000.00 GALLONS.
500.00 GALLONS/DAY.
METRIC TONS HASTE PROCESSESS
1,099.53 081 S02 S04 T01
1,099.53
UNKNOWN TONS.
BUSINESS LINE: WOOD PRESERVATIV
PRINCIPAL OFFICER: DONALD PEGROTT
PHONE: 417/831-2838
STARTED:
NET WORTH:
SALES:
EMPLOYEES:
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
30
w* NOTE: END OF REPORT FOR FACILITY: MOD007129406, KERR-MCGEE CHEMICAL CORP ««*
-------
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY. OFFICE OF SOLID MASTE
HAZARDOUS HASTE FACILITY PROFILE DATEI 06FEB85
PREPARED BY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING AND RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC. (DPRA) PAGEj 1
DATA SOURCES HMDM3 VERSION VI (AS OF 27DEC04) FACILITY; OKD041501347
FOR FACILITY: OK0041501347, MC OONNELL-DOU6LAS CORP
FACILITY INFORMATION
EPA IDENTIFICATION NUMBER! OKD04I501347 EPA REGIONl 06
FACILITY NAME: MC DONNELL-OOUGLAS CORP FACILITY OWNER: UNITED STATES AIR FORCE
HAILING ADDRESS: 2000 N MEMORIAL DRIVE AERONAUTICAL SYSTEMS DIVISION
TULSA OK 74115 WRIGHT PATTERSON AFB OH 45433
513/255-4466
CONTACT PERSON/TITLE: COLE J D FACILITIES MANAGER
CONTACT TELEPHONE: 918/836-1616
FACILITY OPERATOR: MCDONNELL DOUGLAS-TULSA
ACTUAL ADDRESS: 2000 N MEMORIAL DRIVE 2000 N MEMORIAL DRIVE
TULSA OK 74115 ???????????????????????!? OK Wit
918/836-1616
FACILITY IS A NON-MAJOR HANDLER NOTIFIED UNDER RCRA.
FACILITY IS F
TSOF OWNER IS NOT THE OPERATOR. COUNTY: 143 TULSA EXISTENCE: 10SEP53
Pl EXISTING FACILITY. LATITUDE : 36-11-00.0 CLOSURE: UNKNOWN DATE
I NATURE OF BUSINESS DESCRIPTION IS PRESENT. LONGITUDE: 95-52-40.0 LAST HMDMS UPDATE: 30NOV84
O MAP IS ACCEPTABLE. DRAWING IS ACCEPTABLE. PHOTOGRAPHS ARE ACCEPTABLE. INDIAN LAND: NO
NOTIFICATION ACTIVITIES: GENERATION, TREATMENT/STORAGE/DISPOSAL.
SIC CODES:
(04) 3728 AIRCRAFT EQUIPMENT, NEC (02) 3662 RADIO/TV COMMUNICATION EQUIPMN (03) 3769 SPACE VEHICLE EQUIPMENT, NEC
DESIGN CAPACITIES:
(01) SOI CONTAINER 15,400.00 GALLONS. (02) 302 TANK STORAGE 729,604.00 GALLONS.
(03) S04 SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT 3,000.000.00 GALLONS. (04) T04 OTHER TREATMENT 350,400.00 GALLONS/DAY.
WASTESI METRIC TONS MASTE PROCESSESS
F017 PAINT RESIDUES GENERATED FROM 32.66 SOI
F001 SPENT HALO CHLORIDES 4 SLUDGE 1.13 SOI
0007 CHROMIUM 13.653.36 S04
D002 NON-LISTED CORROSIVE MASTRES 68,040.00 SOI S02 T04
D001 NON-LISTED IGNITABLE WASTES 40.82 SOI
0000 NON-LISTED TOXIC WASTES 19.05 SOI
MM FACILITY TOTAL M» 81,787.03
HASTES WITHOUT AMOUNTS OR PROCESSES:
0006 0008
PHASE II VERIFICATION SURVEY:
WASTE PROCESS SIZES:
HAZARDOUS WASTE GENERATED IN 198It UNKNOWN TONS.
DUNS DATA:
SICS: 3721 STARTED: UNKNOWN
MC DONNELL-DOUGLAS CORP BUSINESS LINE: UNKNOWN NET WORTH: UNKNOWN
2000 N MEMORIAL DRIVE PRINCIPAL OFFICER: ROBERT C LINDSTROH SALES: UNKNOWN
TULSA OK 74115 PHONE: 918/836-1616 EMPLOYEES: 4,000
MM NOTE: END OF REPORT FOR FACILITY: OKD041501347, MC DONNELL-DOUGLAS CORP MM
-------
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCYi OFFICE OF SOLID HASTE
HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITY PROFILE
PREPARED BY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING AND RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC. (DPRA)
DATA SOURCE: IIUDM3 VERSION VI IAS OF 270EC84)
FOR FACILITY! OKD058078775, SUN PETRO PRODUCTS CO TULSA REFINERY
DATE I 06FEBB5
PAGE I 1
FACILITY! 0X0050070775
FACILITY INFORMATION
EPA IDENTIFICATION NUMBERt 0X0050070775
FACILITY NAME: SUN PETRO PRODUCTS CO TULSA REFINERY
MAILING ADDRESS: PO BOX 2039
TULSA OK 74102
EPA REGION:
FACILITY OWNER:
CONTACT PERSON/TITLE:
CONTACT TELEPHONE:
ACTUAL ADDRESS:
B.G. HAWTHORN MANAGER
910/506-7275
1700 SOUTH UNION
TULSA
OK 74107
FACILITY IS A NON-MAJOR HANDLER NOTIFIED UNDER RCRA.
FACILITY IS PRIVATE.
TSDF OWNER IS ALSO THE OPERATOR.
EXISTING FACILITY.
NATURE OF BUSINESS DESCRIPTION IS PRESENT.
06
SUN OIL COMPANY OF PENNSYLVANIA
1600 WALNUT STREET
PHILADELPHIA PA 19103
215/972-2000
FACILITY OPERATOR: SUN OIL COMPANY OF PENNSYLVANIA
1600 WALNUT STREET
?????m?m????m?m?? PA ?????
215/972-2000
COUNTY« 143 TULSA
LATITUDE t 36-08-16.0
LONGITUDE: 96-02-11.0
EXISTENCE:
CLOSURE:
LAST HWDMS UPDATE:
OIJAN13
UNKNOWN DATE
29NOV04
MAP IS ACCEPTABLE.
DRAWING DATA NOT IN HWDMS. PHOTOGRAPHS DATA NOT IN HWDMS. INDIAN LAND: NO
NOTIFICATION ACTIVITIES: GENERATION, TRANSPORTATION. TREATMENT/STORAGE/DISPOSAL.
TRANSPORTATION MODECS): .
SIC COOES:
(Oil 2911 PETROLEUM REFINING
DESIGN CAPACITIES:
(01) D81 LAND APPLICATION
(03) S03 WASTE PILE
(05) T01 TANK TREATMENT
120.00 ACRES.
72.00 CUBIC YARDS.
4,730.000.00 GALLONS/DAY.
(02) SOI CONTAINER
(04) S04 SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT
22,244.00 GALLONS.
1,260,000.00 GALLONS.
WASTES:
U239 XYLENE
UZ20 TOLUENE
U188 PHENOL OR CARBOLIC ACIO.HYDROX
UI34 HYDROFLUORIC ACID (C,T)
U1Z5 FURFURAL (I)
U056 CYCLOIIEXANE(I)
U032 CALCIUM CIIROMATE
U019 BENZENE
U013 ASDESTOS
K052 BOTTOMS (LEADED) FM PETRO REFI
K051 API SLUDGE FM API OILY SEWER P
K050 PETRO REFIN EXC BUNDLE CLEANIN
K049 SLOP OIL FM OILY WATER SEWER P
K048 DAF FM OILY WATER SEWER PETRO
F005 NON-HALOGENATED SOLV t SOLV RE
NOTE: ONLY THE FIFTEEN LARGEST
METRIC TONS WASTE PROCESSESS
0.00 T01
0.00 T01
453.60 T01
0.91 S03
72.50 T01
0.00 T01
3.63 T01
0.00 T01
0.00 SOI
20.87 D81 S02
0.00 T01
3.63 T01
23,950.08 S04 T01 T02
0.00 T01
0.00 T01
WASTES ARE LISTED HERE.
INFORMATION FOR SUN PETRO PRODUCTS CO TULSA REFINERY CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE. «*
-------
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY. OFFICE OF SOLID HASTE
HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITY PROFILE
PREPARED BY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING AND RESEARCH ASSOCIATES. INC. (DPRA)
DATA SOURCES HWDH3 VERSION VI (AS OF 27DEC84)
DATE: 06FED85
PAGES Z
FACILITY! OKD058078775
HASTES:
** FACILITY TOTAL •»*
METRIC TONS HASTE PROCESSESS (CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS PAGE)
30.991.77
HASTES WITHOUT AMOUNTS OR PROCESSESS
0001 0003 K005 K067 P110 U002 U052 U135 U159
PtIASE II VERIFICATION SURVEYS
HASTE PROCESS SIZES:
LAND TREATMENT AREA:
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS:
TREATMENT TANKS:
HAZARDOUS HASTE GENERATED IN 1901:
DUNS DATA:
SICS: 2911
SUN OIL CO OF PENNSYLVANIA**
1600 S UNION
TULSA OK 74107
2E.OO ACRES.
0.00 SQUARE YARDS.
0.00 GALLONS.
UNKNOWN TONS.
BUSINESS LINES UNKNOWN
PRINCIPAL OFFICER: WILLIAM BATES
PHONE: 916X566-6840
STARTED:
NET WORTH:
SALES:
EMPLOYEES:
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
19
*» NOTE: END OF REPORT FOR FACILITY! OKD050078775, SUN PETRO PRODUCTS CO TULSA REFINERY «»
I
M
ro
-------
|