United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards
Research Triangle Park NC 27711
EMB Report 85-IBR-25
January 1985
Air
Industrial E
Emission Test Report
ichigan
-------
EMISSION TEST REPORT
METHOD DEVELOPMENT AND TESTING FOR
INDUSTRIAL BOILERS, PM AND NO
Upjohn Company
Kalamazoo, Michigan
ESED NO. 76/13
EMB NO. 85-IBR-25
by
PEI Associates, Inc.
11499 Chester Road
P.O. Box 46100
Cincinnati, Ohio 45246-0100
Contract No. 68-02-3849
Work Assignment No. 13
PN 3615-13
Mr. Dennis Holzschuh
Emission Measurement Branch
Task Manager
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
EMISSION STANDARDS AND ENGINEERING DIVISION
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NORTH CAROLINA 27711
June 1985
-------
CONTENTS
Page
Figures iv
Tables v
Acknowledgment vii
Quality Assurance Element Finder viii
1. Introduction 1-1
2,
Summary of Test Results 2-1
2.1 Test protocol 2-1
2.2 Continuous emission monitor data 2-6
2.3 Process sample analytical results 2-11
2.4 Flue gas data 2-13
3. Quality Assurance 3-1
3.1 Continuous emission monitors 3-2
3.2 Manual tests—moisture and NO 3-30
A
4. Sampling Locations and Test Methods 4-1
4.1 Sampling locations 4-1
4.2 Continuous emission monitors—sample extraction,
analysis, and data reduction 4-1
4.3 Velocity and gas temperature 4-7
4.4 Stack gas moisture determination 4-8
4.5 Manual test method for NO 4-8
/\
5. Process Description and Operation 5-1
5.1 Boiler Unit 5 5-1
5.2 Stoker gas recirculation system 5-3
5.3 Operating conditions 5-4
Appendices
A Computer Printouts and Example Calculations A-l
B Field Data Sheets B-l
C Laboratory Data Sheets C-l
D Sampling and Analytical Procedures D-l
E Equipment Calibration Procedures and Results E-l
F Quality Assurance Summary F-l
G Project Participants and Field Log G-l
iii
-------
FIGURES
Number Page
2-1 Boiler No. 5 2-3
2-2 Boiler Layout and Sampling Locations 2-4
3-1 Location of Sampling Points for Stratification Check 3-3
3-2 CEM Calibration Gas Analytical Report 3-12
3-3 CEM Calibration Gas Analytical Report 3-13
3-4 Example NO Calibration Curve 3-14
/\
3-5 Example Op Calibration Curve—Stack Monitor 3-15
3-6 Example 02 Calibration Curve—Boiler Monitor 3-16
3-7 Example CO Calibration Curve 3-17
3-8 Example C02 Calibration Curve 3-18
4-1 No. 5 Boiler Outlet Stack 4-2
4-2 Stack Outlet—CEM System 4-3
4-3 Boiler Outlet—CEM System 4-6
5-1 Boiler Unit 5 Layout 5-2
IV
-------
TABLES
Number Page
2-1 Summary of Boiler Operating and Sampling Parameters 2-2
2-2 Summary of Continuous Emission Monitoring Data 2-7
2-3 Summary of Maximum and Minimum CEM Data by Test Block 2-8
2-4 Summary of NO Emission Rates 2-12
A
2-5 Summary of Coal Analysis Data 2-14
2-6 Ash Sample Analytical Results 2-15
2-7 Summary of Flue Gas Data for Boiler No. 5 2-16
3-1 Monitor Stratification Test—Stack Outlet 3-4
3-2 Monitor Stratification Test—Outlet Boiler 3-5
3-3 Test Results for NO Monitor 24-Hour Zero and Calibra-
tion Drift 3-6
3-4 Test Results for Stack 0? Monitor 24-Hour Zero and
Calibration Drift 3-7
3-5 Test Results for CO Monitor 24-Hour Zero and Calibra-
tion Drift 3-8
3-6 Test Results for Boiler Outlet 02 Monitor 24-Hour Zero
and Calibration Drift 3-9
3-7 Average Monitor Response Time 3-10
3-8 Comparison of 5- and 10-Minute Data Reduction Intervals 3-20
3-9 NO Linear Regression Data 3-21
/\
3-10 Stack 02 Linear Regression Data 3-22
-------
TABLES (continued)
Number Page
3-11 CO Linear Regression Data 3-23
3-12 C02 Linear Regression Data 3-24
3-13 Boiler Outlet 02 Linear Regression Data 3-25
3-14 Summary of NO CEM Audit Results 3-26
/\
3-15 Summary of 02 CEM Audit Results 3-27
3-16 Comparison of Reference Method 7 and NO CEM Test Results 3-28
/\
3-17 Comparison of Oxygen and Carbon Dioxide Results--CEM
and Reference Method 3 (Orsat) 3-29
3-18 Field Equipment Calibration 3-31
3-19 NOV Audit Results 3-32
/\
3-20 Coal Audit Results 3-33
5-1 Boiler Process Data 5-5
-------
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Mr. Dennis Holzschuh, EPA Task Manager, provided overall project coor-
dination and observed the test program. Mr. Kevin Johnson of Radian Corpora-
tion, an EPA contractor, provided project coordination relative to the scope
and process operation. Mr. Johnson monitored and recorded all pertinent
boiler operating data. Mr. Merwin Wittum of Upjohn Company provided assist-
ance in scheduling and Mr. William Capel, also of Upjohn, coordinated boiler
operation throughout the test program. Mr. Ken Prout and Ms. Linda Benson of
Riley-Stoker Corporation observed the test program and monitored boiler
operation. Mr. Charles Bruffey was the PEI Project Manager. Principal
report authors were Messrs. Charles Bruffey, Paul Reinermann, and Daniel
Scheffel.
vn
-------
QUALITY ASSURANCE ELEMENT FINDER
Location
Section Page
(1) Title page
(2) Table of contents
(3) Project description
(4) QA objective for measurement of data in terms
of precision, accuracy, completeness, repre-
sentativeness, and comparability
(5) Sampling procedures
(6) Sample custody
(7) Calibration procedures and frequency
(8) Analytical procedures
(9) Data reduction, validation, and reporting
(10) Internal quality control checks and frequency
(11) Performance and system audits and frequency
(12) Preventive maintenance procedures and schedules
(13) Specific routine procedures used to assess data
precision, accuracy, and completeness of specif-
ic measurement parameters involved
(14) Corrective action
(15) Quality assurance reports to management
Appendix F
Section 3
Appendix D
Section 4
Appendix C
Appendix E
Section 3
Appendix D
Section 4
Appendix F
Section 3
Appendix F
Section 3
Appendix F
Section 3
Appendix F
Appendix F
Appendix F
Appendix F
F-2
D-l
C-l
E-l
D-l
F-3
F-5
F-3
F-12
F-4
F-ll
F-12
vm
-------
SECTION 1
INTRODUCTION
The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is developing
standards of performance for industrial boilers in accordance with Section
111 of the Clean Air Act as amended August 1977. The Act requires that the
standards be based on the "... best technological system of continuous emis-
sion reduction which the Administrator of EPA determines has been adequately
demonstrated." Accordingly, EPA is interested in the nitrogen oxide (NO )
control capability of coal-fired stoker boilers that use stoker gas recircu-
lation (SGR).
To support the standards development process and provide data to char-
acterize emissions from a coal-fired stoker boiler, PEI Associates, Inc.,
performed a series of atmospheric emission tests on a Riley-Stoker coal-fired
boiler equipped with SGR at the Upjohn Company plant in Kalamazoo, Michigan.
These tests were conducted under contract to EPA's Emission Measurement
Branch (EMB) from January 15 to 17, 1985. The primary objective of the test
program was to characterize NO emissions as a function of boiler load,
A
excess air [oxygen (02) level], and SGR. No major problems were encountered
during the test program and project objectives were met.
All testing was performed on Boiler 5, which is a Riley-Stoker coal-
fired unit with a steam production capacity of 90,000 pounds per hour (Ib/h).
Continuous emission monitor (CEM) systems for NO , oxygen (0«), carbon
X c.
monoxide (CO), and carbon dioxide (CO^) were used to characterize these
1-1
-------
pollutants as a function of boiler load, excess air, and the effects of
stoker gas recirculation. Flue gas volumetric flow rates, temperature, and
moisture content were determined in conjunction with the CEM tests according
to procedures described in EPA Methods 1 through 4.* As a data quality
assurance check for the NO CEM system, EPA Method 7* tests were also
/^
conducted. In addition, samples of undergrate ash, bottom grate boiler ash,
and mechanical collector ash were collected and analyzed for moisture content
and combustibles to aid in the evaluation of overall boiler performance.
Section 2 of this report summarizes the results of the test program.
Section 3 addresses quality assurance activities undertaken to assure repre-
sentative data collection. Section 4 summarizes the testing and analytical
procedures used and describes the sampling locations. Section 5 describes
the process and its operation during the test series. Appendices A through F
contain computer printouts and calculations, all field and laboratory data
sheets, detailed descriptions of the testing and analytical procedures used,
and equipment calibration procedures and results.
40 CFR 60, Appendix A, July 1984.
1-2
-------
SECTION 2
SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS
This section details the results of the field test program. For the
reader's convenience, emission data are presented in both metric and English
units where applicable. Also, subsections are used to present each phase of
the sampling program and the corresponding emission results.
2.1 TEST PROTOCOL
Table 2-1 presents a summary of the process operating parameters and the
types of tests performed during the program.
All tests were conducted on Upjohn's No. 5 boiler, a Riley-Stoker cross-
feed spreader stoker boiler with a steam production capacity of 90,000 Ib/h.
Flue gas exits the boiler and passes through a mechanical collector, an econo-
mizer, and induced-draft (I-D) fan before being vented to the atmosphere. The
recirculated flue gas is pulled upstream of the economizer and introduced to
the boiler with the primary combustion air underneath the grate. Figure 2-1
presents a schematic of the boiler gas flow scheme, and Figure 2-2 presents
the basic boiler layout and sampling locations.
As shown in Figure 2-2, flue gas samples were extracted at two locations.
At the outlet stack, gas samples were continuously analyzed for NO , 09, CO,
A £
and C02- A second 02 continuous emission monitor (CEM) was located at the
boiler outlet prior to the mechanical collector. Oxygen values measured at
2-1
-------
TABLE 2-1. SUMMARY OF BOILER OPERATING AND SAMPLING PARAMETERS
ro
i
ro
Test
block
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Date
(1985) and
time (24-h)
1/15
1058-1258
1/15
1432-1636
1/15
1728-1958
1/16
1013-1357
1/16
1521-1621
1/16
1708-1808
1/17
0917-1032
1/17
1110-1210
1/17
1244-1344
1/17
1442-1612
Boiler
ID
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Under-
grate 0,
level,* X
18.0-18.5
20.9
18.0-18.5
18.0-18.5
18.0-18.5
17.5-18.0
17.5-18.0
20.9
20.9
17.5-18.0
Operating parameters
Boiler
load,b J
100
100
75
100
75
75
50
75
75
75
SGRC
On
Off
On
On
(Full)
On
On
(Low)
On
(Low)
Off
Off
On
Oxygen
level
Low
Low
Inter-
mediate
Low
High
Low
Inter-
mediate
InteV-
mediate
Low
Low
Sample parameters
CEM's (NO.,
02, CO, x
and C02)
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Manual
tests 1
through 4
X
_
X
X
X
.
X
.
.
„
EPA
Method
7 (N0x)
_
X
_
X
_
X
_
_
.
_
Coal
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
1
Ash
.
_
.
.
X
.
.
X
.
.
Undergrate 0, level as determined by Upjohn personnel.
bBoiler load: 100% (s<)0,000 Ib/h steam); 75% (=67,500 Ib/h steam); 50% (s45,000 Ib/h steam).
GStoker gas recirculatlon: On (15% damper setting); On-Full (30* damper setting); On-Low (5% damper setting).
Oxygen level as measured at the boiler outlet.
-------
OVERFIRE AIR
IV)
CO
1
NO. 5 BOILER
MECHANICAL
COLLECTOR
RECIRCULATEO FLUE GAS
PRIMARY AIR
TO STACK
ECONOMIZER
I.D. FAN
Figure 2-1. Boiler No. 5.
-------
A-SAMPLE LOCATION
E-SAMPLE
LOCATION
B-SAMPLE LOCATION
.Induced a
Drall
Fan I
,HoM)er C-SAMPLE LOCATION
17
SAMPLE LOCATION A:
CEM's: NOX
°2
col
CO
MANUAL METHODS 1—4
AND 7
D- SAMPLE LOCATION
F- SAMPLE LOCATION:
UNDERGRATE ASH ONLY
SAMPLE LOCATION B BOILER OUTLET:
CEM: 02 ONLY
SAMPLE LOCATION D:
BOTTOM GRATE ASH ONLY
SAMPLE LOCATION C:
COAL ONLY
SAMPLE LOCATION E:
DUST COLLECTOR ASH ONLY
Figure 2-2. Boiler layout and sampling locations.
2-4
-------
the boiler outlet were used to determine the specific CL levels (low, inter-
mediate, and high) evaluated during this study. This was necessary to pre-
clude positive bias of CL levels measured at the stack as a result of air
in-leakage between the boiler outlet and stack sampling locations.
During the testing program, three primary boiler operating parameters
were evaluated: 1) heat release rate (load), 2) excess air (02) level, and 3)
the effects of stoker gas recirculation. For purposes of this study, full
load conditions were represented by a steam production rate of approximately
90,000 Ib/h. Thus, 75 and 50 percent boiler loads were represented by steam
rates of 67,500 Ib/h and 45,000 Ib/h respectively.
Upjohn personnel controlled the SGR operation manually. Three recir-
culation damper settings were used during this study, as presented in Table
2-1. The designation "on" represents a damper setting of about 15 percent
open, "on-full" represents a damper setting of about 30 percent open, and
"on-low" represents a damper setting of about 5 percent open. A damper set-
ting of 40 percent open produces essentially the maximum recirculation rate,
which is approximately 20 percent of the total flue gas stream. For Test
Blocks 1, 3, 4, and 5, the undergrate 02 level measured by Upjohn ranged from
18 to 18.5 percent. For Test Blocks 6, 7, and 10, the undergrate 00 level
ranged from 17.5 to 18 percent. With the SGR system off, the undergrate 00
level was 20.9 percent.
A total of 10 test blocks were conducted, during which NO , 0?, CO, and
A C,
C02 were continuously monitored. In addition, flue gas flow rates, tempera-
tures, and moisture content were measured for each boiler load condition.
Representative samples of coal were collected from the boiler feed hopper
during each test block and subjected to a proximate and ultimate analysis.
2-5
-------
Samples of undergrate ash, boiler grate bottom ash, and mechanical collector
ash were also collected and analyzed for moisture content and combustibles.
These data, in conjunction with the coal analyses data and stack gas measure-
ments, were used to validate boiler performance and to develop NO emission
X
rates on a basis of pounds per million Btu heat input (lb/10 Btu).
Personnel from Radian Corporation monitored boiler operation and coor-
dinated the test sequence (Table 2-1) with Upjohn and PEI personnel.
The following subsections present the results of the test program.
2.2 CONTINUOUS EMISSION MONITOR DATA
An extractive monitoring system was assembled on site to characterize
emissions data for NO , 0^, CO, and C0~ as a function of boiler load, excess
air (Op) level, and the effects of stoker gas recirculation. Table 2-2 sum-
marizes the boiler operating parameters and corresponding CEM data for each
designated test block. Table 2-3 presents the maximum and minimum pollutant
concentrations recorded for each test block.
A test block typically represented a 1- to 2-hour monitoring period
during which the boiler load, the oxygen level as measured at the boiler
outlet, and the SGR operations remained relatively constant at the conditions
listed in Tables 2-1 and 2-2.
Regardless of the test time, the reduction of the CEM data was accom-
plished by taking a strip chart reading for every 10-minute period and deter-
mining the corresponding pollutant concentration by the use of linear
regression equations established from the calibration data for each monitor.
For a 2-hour test block, this procedure yielded 12 data points; and for a
1-hour test block, 6 data points. Pollutant concentrations reported in Table
2-2 represent average values determined from the number of data points for
each test block.
2-6
-------
TABLE 2-2. SUMMARY OF CONTINUOUS EMISSION MONITORING DATA
ro
i
-•j
Test
block
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Date
(1985) and
time (24-h)
1/15
1058-1258
1/15
1432-1636
1/15
1728-1928
1/16
1013-1357
1/16
1521-1621
1/16
1708-1808
1/17
0917-1032
1/17
1110-1210
1/17
1244-1344
1/17
1442-1612
Boiler
ID
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Operating parameters
Fuel
type
Coal
Coal
Coal
Coal
Coal
Coal
Coal
Coal
Coal
Coal
Load9
100
100
75
100
75
75
50
75
75
75
02 level6
Low
Low
M1d
Low
High
Low
Mid
Mid
Low
Low
Stoker gas
recir-
culation
On
Off
On
On (Full)
On
On (Low)
On (Low)
Off
Off
On
Boiler
outlet
0,. *
3.4
4.5
5.7
3.0
7.1
3.0
6.2
6.0
3.0
2.8
Average emission data, dry basis
Stack outlet
NO ,
ppft
282
256
280
268
282
248
248
288
256
248
NO. at
3*xoz ,
ppm
295
318
339
271
391
257
306
371
281
260
Of. %
3.8
6.5
6.1
3.2
8.0
3.9
6.4
7.0
4.6
3.8
C02, *
14.8
12.9
13.3
15.2
12.2
15.0
13.2
11.3
13.4
15.0
CO,
ppm
63
42
24
42
26
36
30
22
28
43
Boiler load: 100* (=90,000 Ib/h steam); 75* (=67,500 Ib/h steam); 50* (=45,000 Ib/h steam)
Oxygen level as measured at the boiler outlet.
Stoker gas recirculation: On (15* damper); On-Full (30* damper); On-Low (5* damper).
-------
TABLE 2-3. SUMMARY OF MAXIMUM AND MINIMUM CEM DATA BY TEST BLOCK
Test
block
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Date
(1985)
1/15
1/15
1/15
1/15
1/16
1/16
1/17
1/17
1/17
1/17
CEM data3
boiler out-
let 02, %
Max.
5.1
6.2
6.6
4.3
8.0
5.2
6.8
6.9
5.4
3.9
Min.
2.1
1.7
4.0
1.5
5.9
1.7
5.4
4.8
1.7
1.5
NO , ppm
Max.
318
290
297
294
292
273
256
297
275
272
Min.
243
233
260
238
273
204
233
277
231
218
N0y
atx3%
02, ppm
Max.
333
361
359
297
405
287
316
383
302
285
Min.
254
290
315
241
379
215
288
357
254
229
CEM data3 (stack)
0?, %
Max.
4.8
7.2
7.5
4.8
8.9
6.3
7.1
7.6
6.8
5.2
Min.
2.3
5.5
4.6
1.7
6.7
2.1
5.3
6.0
3.3
2.4
C02, %
Max.
16.3
14.4
15.3
17
13.3
15.9
14.4
12.0
14.4
16.0
MTn.
13.4
11.7
11.9
13.7
11.3
13.3
11.6
10.5
11.6
14.1
CO, ppm
Max.
434
84
31
122
33
194
40
25
110
151
Min.
26
31
18
14
20
19
24
18
16
21
ro
i
CO
Dry basis.
-------
As a data validation check, the NOV and 09 strip chart data were reduced
X £
at 5-minute intervals to determine if the two data reduction techniques dif-
fered significantly. In each case, the difference in average values between
the 5- and 10-minute time intervals was less than 1 percent. These data are
presented in Appendix A of this report.
Eight of the 10 test blocks were conducted without interruption in moni-
toring data. During Test Blocks 2 and 4, however, several problems were
encountered that lengthened the monitoring period. An explanation of the data
reduction procedure used for these two test blocks is in order. During Test
Block 2, the stack CEM system was essentially off-line between 1502 and 1605
because of freezing condensation in the gas conditioning system. Periodic
readings of NOV data were obtained between 1513 and 1547 as the gas condition-
X
ing system was repaired. Inasmuch as these data points correlated with NO
/\
data obtained before and after the CEM downtime, they were included in the
calculation of average NO emissions for this period. Representative stack 09
X L.
data were not available for this period of time, however, because the 0?
monitor exhibited a slower response time than the NO monitor during the brief
/\
pollution measurement episodes recorded during the downtime period. As a
result, the stack 02 data for the downtime period was extrapolated from the
boiler outlet 02 data. The average stack Op concentration reported in Table
2-2 includes the extrapolated data points.
During Test Block 4, the boiler experienced two upset conditions caused
by an improper balance of coal feed due to a broken shear loop (wire) on one
feed motor, resulting in load and oxygen swings. The first interruption in
monitoring data occurred between 1108 and 1236 and the second, between 1257
and 1301. During the excursions, the boiler outlet 0^ content ranged between
2-9
-------
0.5 and 6 percent. The CEM data recorded during the boiler upsets were not
included in the calculation of average emission results for this test block.
Nitrogen oxide concentrations are reported in parts per million by volume
on a dry basis. These concentrations have also been corrected to 3 percent Op
as a standard by which emission trends can be evaluated. Oxygen and COp
concentrations are reported in percentage by volume and CO concentrations are
reported in parts per million by volume, all on a dry basis.
In the evaluation of the data relative to the specific process param-
eters, NO concentrations corrected to 3 percent 09 were used. In addition,
X C.
referenced Op (excess air) levels are as measured at the boiler outlet.
Analysis of the test data showed several general trends:
1) As expected, NO concentrations increased with increasing excess air
(0?) levels. Tne results of Test Blocks 3, 5, and 10 substantiate
this conclusion. These test blocks were conducted under similar
boiler load (75%) and SGR operating conditions (on, 15% damper
setting). Test Block 10 (2.8% 02) showed an average NO concentra-
tion of 260 ppm; Test Block 3 (5.7% 02) showed an average NO con-
centration of 339 ppm; and Test Block 5 (7.1% 02) showed an average
NO concentration of 391 ppm. Similar characteristics were exhib-
ited by Test Blocks 8 and 9 under similar loads (75%) and SGR op-
erating conditions (off). Test Block 8 (6.0% 02) showed an average
NO concentration of 371 ppm compared with Test Block 9 (3.0% 02),
which showed an average NO concentration of 281 ppm. In each case,
NO concentrations at 02 levels greater than 5 percent were between
25 and 35 percent greater than at the lower levels of 02 evaluated.
2) The operation of the SGR system appeared to enhance the ability of
the boiler to operate efficiently at lower excess air levels, par-
ticularly at full load, thus reducing NO concentrations. Test
Blocks 1, 2, and 4 were conducted at similar boiler loads (100%) and
similar 02 levels, but variable SGR operation. Test Block 1 (100%;
3.4% 02; SGR-On, 15%) showed an average NO concentration of 295 ppm
compared with Test Block 2 (100%; 4.5% 02; SGR-Off), which showed an
average NO concentration of 318 ppm, or approximately a 7 percent
reduction Tn NO emissions. Data from Test Block 4 (100%; 3.0% 02;
SGR-On, 30%) showed an average NO concentration of 271 ppm, which
indicates that an increase in the SGR damper setting (recirculation
air volume) results in NO emissions approximately 8 percent lower
than with the SGR at a 15 percent damper setting and approximately
15 percent lower than with the SGR system off. These results are
influenced by the lower 02 levels achieved, without producing smoke
2-10
-------
conditions, by SGR operation. Similar patterns were also observed
with almost idential 02 levels, however, when data from Test Blocks
3 and 8, 6 and 9, and 9 and 10 were compared. Test Block 3 (75%,
5.7% 02; SGR-On 15%) showed an average NO concentration of 339 ppm
compared with Test Block 8 (75%; 6.0%; SGR-Off), which showed an
average NO concentration of 371 ppm. Test Block 6 (75%; 3.0% 02;
SGR-On 5%) showed an average NO concentration of 257 ppm compared
with Test Block 9 (75%; 3.0% 02; SGR-Off) which showed an average
NO concentration of 281 ppm. The average NO concentration for
Te§t Block 9 was 281 ppm compared with Test BTock 10 (75%; 2.8% 02;
SGR-On, 15%) which showed an average concentration of 260 ppm. In
each case, and for similar boiler loads and 02 levels, operation of
the SGR system resulted in reductions in NO concentrations ranging
between 7 and 9 percent.
3) As expected, at similar 02 levels the NO emissions increased with
increasing boiler load. Test Block 1 (100%; 3.4% 02; SGR-On, 15%)
and Test Block 10 (75%; 2.8% 02; SGR-On, 15%) showed average NO
concentrations of 295 and 260 ppm respectively, which corresponds to
a 12 percent increase in NO emissions. Test Blocks 2 and 9 exhib-
ited similar characteristics. Test Block 2 (100%; 4.5% 02; SGR-Off)
and Test Block 9 (75%; 3.0% 02; SGR-Off) showed concentrations of
318 and 281 ppm respectively, or again about a 12 percent increase
in NO emissions at the higher boiler load.
A
For data presention and informational purposes, the NO CEM data were
A
used to calculate mass emission rates in pounds per million Btu (lb/10 Btu).
This was accomplished by converting the reported average parts per million of
NO concentration (corrected to 3 percent 0?) to pounds per dry standard cubic
A Lm
foot and then multiplying this value by the appropriate F-factor based on fuel
type and an excess air correction factor. The F-factor relates the amount of
dry flue gas generated to the calorific value of the fuel combusted and is
expressed in dry standard cubic feet per million Btu heat input. These data
are summarized in Table 2-4. The NO emission rates ranged between 0.35
A
lb/106 Btu for Test Block 6 and 0.53 lb/106 Btu for Test Block 5.
2.3 PROCESS SAMPLE ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Coal samples collected during each test block were subjected to proxi-
mate/ultimate analyses according to procedures described in ASTM D271. Table
2-11
-------
TABLE 2-4.
SUMMARY OF N0¥ EMISSION RATES
/\
Test
block
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Date
(1985)
1/15
1/15
1/15
1/16
1/16
1/16
1/17
1/17
1/17
1/17
NO concen-
trati6n at 3% 02
ppm
295
318
339
271
391
257
306
371
281
260
Ib/dscf x 10"b
3.52
3.80
4.05
3.24
4.67
3.07
3.66
4.43
3.36
3.11
NOX mass emi
rate,b lb/10
0.40
0.43
0.46
0.37
0.53
0.35
0.41
0.50
0.38
0.36
ssion
6 Btu
Conversion factor:
M
385.1 x
where M = the molecular weight of N02 (46).
bNOv emission rate (lb/106 Btu):
A
NO concentration (Ib/dscf) x (F-factor) x (—,
A ^
= NO emission rate in lb/10 Btu.
A
02 = 3
2-12
-------
2-5 summarizes the analytical data for the coal. These data were character-
ized by ash contents ranging from 7.46 to 10.87 percent, nitrogen contents of
between 1.47 and 1.75 percent, sulfur contents of between 1.29 and 2.47 per-
cent, and heating values ranging from 13,059 to 13,827 Btu/lb. These data
were used to calculate F-factors for each test block as described in Subpart D
of the Federal Register.* The calculated F-factors ranged from 9660 dscf/10
Btu for Test Block 5 to 9811 dscf/106 Btu for Test Block 10. In each case,
the calculated F-factors agreed to within ± 3 percent of the reference F-
factor (9780 dscf/10 Btu) listed for bituminous coal in Subpart D of the
Federal Register. The calculated F-factors were used in all NO emission rate
A
calculations.
Table 2-6 presents results of the sample analysis performed on bottom
grate boiler ash, undergrate ash, and mechanical collector fly ash samples
collected during Test Blocks 5 and 8. Moisture content was determined by ASTM
D3173 and ash content by ASTM D3174. The percentage of combustibles was
determined by difference. The moisture content of the samples was essentially
less than 0.1 percent. The undergrate fly ash was characterized by an ash
content of 54 to 56 percent. The bottom grate boiler ash was characterized by
an ash content of 86 to 95 percent, and the mechanical collector ash content
ranged between 43 and 50 percent.
2.4 FLUE GAS DATA
Table 2-7 summarizes the volumetric flow rate, temperature, and moisture
content data obtained during the test program. Flow rates at stack conditions
are expressed in actual cubic meters per minute (m3/min) and actual cubic feet
per minute (acfm). Flow rates corrected to standard conditions [20°C (68°F),
*
40 CFR 60, Subpart D. New Source Performance Standards for Fossil-Fuel -
Fired Steam Generators. July 1984.
2-13
-------
TABLE 2-5. SUMMARY OF COAL ANALYSIS DATA£
I
-p.
Test
block
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
B
9
10
Date
(1985)
1/15
1/15
1/15
1/16
1/16
1/16
1/17
1/17
1/17
1/17
Ultimate coal analysis, dry basis
Carbon,
%
75.97
75.69
76.18
75.67
71.99
75.13
75.46
76.83
75.56
76.50
Hydrogen ,
%
5.18
5.11
5. 23
5.23
4.95
5.14
5.23
5.22
5.14
5.16
Oxygen,
1:
6.86
7.83
7.82
7.77
7.95
7.37
7.64
6.62
7.26
6.71
Nitrogen,
*
1.73
1.66
1.72
1.61
1.66
1.75
1.59
1.57
1.47
1.63
Mois-.
ture, %
7.92
6.65
6.83
6.50
6.27
5.93
6.22
5.19
6.17
5.55
Proximate coal analysis, dry basis
Ash,
%
8.56
8.09
7.46
8.04
10.87
8.64
8.26
8.10
8.77
8.59
Volatile
matter,
%
36.30
36.83
37.33
37.55
37.20
37.43
37.57
37.64
37.84
36.53
Fixed
carbon,
%
55.14
55.08
55.21
54.41
51.93
55.93
54.17
54.26
53.39
54.88
Sulfur,
%
1.52
1.52
1.46
1.56
2.47
1.86
1.69
1.53
1.51
1.29
Heating
value.
Btu/lb
13.727
13,645
13.617
13,576
13,059
13,592
13.649
13,827
13,559
13,628
Calculated
F-f actor,
dscf/106 Btu
9692
9667
9772
9749
9660
9680
9683.
9734
9739
9811
Plant personnel collected coal samples. Grab samples were obtained from the No. 5 coal feed hopper approximately every 30 minutes
during the test blocks. The grab samples were composited and analyzed according to ASTM 0271.
As-received basis.
-------
TABLE 2-6. ASH SAMPLE ANALYTICAL RESULTS0
Test
block
5
8
Date
(1985)
1/16
1/17
Source description
Undergrate ash
Bottom grate boiler ash
Mechanical collector fly ash
Undergrate ash
Bottom grate boiler ash
Mechanical collector fly ash
Analytical parameter
Mois-
ture, %
<0.02
0.04
0.02
0.11
<0.02
<0.02
Combus-
tibles, %
43.61
14.13
56.53
45.85
5.01
50.18
Ash, %
56.39
85.87
43.47
54.15
94.99
49.82
Samples collected by plant personnel.
^Moisture by ASTM D3173 and ash by ASTM D3174. Percent combustibles = 100
ash.
2-15
-------
TABLE 2-7. SUMMARY OF FLUE GAS DATA FOR BOILER NO. 5
Test
block
No.
1
3
4
5
7
Date
(1985)
1/15
1/15
1/16
1/16
1/17
Boiler
load,
%
100
75
100
75
50
Volumetric flow rate3
m3/min
(acfm)
1093 .
(38,600)°
847
(29,900)
1093
(38,600)
946
(33,400)
674
(23,800)
dNm3/min
(dscfm)
575 ,
(20,300)°
479
(16,900)
583
(20,600)
524
(18,500)
396
(14,000)
Temper-
ature,
°C (°F)
233
(451)
199
(392)
228
(443)
209
(409)
168
(334)
Moisture.
content,
%
7.2
7.2
7.2
7.2
7.2
o2,c
%
3.8
6.1
3.2
8.0
6.4
C02,C
%
14.8
13.3
15.2
12.2
13.2
Flue gas volumetric flow rate in actual cubic meters per minute (m3/min) and
dry normal cubic meters per minute (dNm3/min, zero percent moisture, 20°C, and
760 mmHg).
Average moisture content determined from three EPA Method 4 tests.
C02 and C02 data are average values measured by the CEM system for the desig-
nated test block.
Represents average value of measurements made before and after the desig-
nated test block.
2-16
-------
760 mmHg (29.92 in.Hg), and zero percent moisture] are expressed in dry normal
cubic meters per minute (dNm3/min) and dry standard cubic feet per minute
(dscf/min).
Three gas velocity and temperature measurements were made at 100 percent
boiler load, two were made at 75 percent load, and one was made at 50 percent
load. Procedures described in EPA Reference Methods 1 and 2* were used. In
addition, three EPA Method 4* tests were conducted to determine the stack gas
moisture content. The moisture content of the gas stream ranged between 6.2
and 8.0 percent, and a three-test average of 7.2 percent was used in all flow
rate calculations. The stack gas molecular weight was calculated from the
average CEM 02 and COp data to facilitate flow rate calculations.
At 100 percent boiler load, flue gas flow averaged 1093 m3/min (38,600
acfm) and 575 dNm3/min (20,300 dscfm), and average gas temperatures ranged
between 228° and 233°C (443° and 451°F). At 75 percent load, flue gas flow
averaged 897 m3/min (31,650 acfm) and 502 dNm3/min (17,700 dscfm), and tem-
peratures ranged between 199° and 209°C (392° and 409°F). The measured gas
flow at 50 percent load was 674 m3/min (23,800 acfm) and 396 dNm3/min (14,000
dscfm) at a temperature of 168°C (334°F).
*
40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Reference Methods 1, 2, and 4, July 1984.
2-17
-------
SECTION 3
QUALITY ASSURANCE
The objective of testing is to produce representative emission results;
therefore, quality assurance is one of the main facets of stack sampling.
Quality assurance guidelines provide the detailed procedures and actions
necessary for defining and producing acceptable data. Four such documents
were used in this test program to ensure the collection of acceptable data and
to provide a definition of unacceptable data. The following documents com-
prised the source-specific test plan prepared by PEI and reviewed by the
Emission Measurement Branch of the EPA; the EPA Quality Assurance Handbook
Volume III, EPA-600/4-77-027; the PEI Emission Test Quality Plan; and the PEI
Laboratory Quality Assurance Plan. The last two, which are PEI's general
guideline manuals, define the company's standard operating procedures and are
followed by the emission testing and laboratory groups.
Relative to this specific test program, the following steps were taken to
ensure that the testing and analytical procedures produced quality data.
0 Calibration of all field sampling equipment.
0 Checks of train configuration and calculations.
0 Onsite quality assurance checks, such as sampling train, pitot tube,
and Orsat line leak checks and quality assurance checks of all test
equipment prior to use.
0 Use of designated analytical equipment and sampling reagents.
0 Internal and external audits to ensure accuracy in sampling and
analysis.
3-1
-------
Quality assurance activities for each specific phase of this project are
summarized in the following subsections:
3.1 CONTINUOUS EMISSION MONITORS
Each CEM system was set up and operated according to specifications
outlined in the monitor operating manuals. Performance specifications (zero
drift, span drift, and response time) outlined in 40 CFR 60, Appendix B,
Performance Specifications 2 and 3, were followed throughout this test pro-
gram.
Prior to actual stack gas monitoring, a pollutant profile was established
by traversing the stack cross section and comparing individual sample point
values for NO and 09 against a reference point (stack centroid); this per-
X £
mitted determination of possible gas stratification in the stack. Figure 3-1
presents the location of the test points for the No. 5 boiler stack outlet. A
difference of less than 10 percent between individual sampling points and the
reference data point indicated no significant stratification problem existed
at the sampling locations. Tables 3-1 and 3-2 show stratification results for
the stack outlet and boiler outlet sampling locations.
At the beginning of each test day, each monitoring system was leak-
checked and system checks for zero drift, span drift, and response time were
conducted. The performance specification tests followed were established for
"continuous on-line" analyzers in operation for long periods of time. The
tests applied to monitors in this test series were used as general checks to
ensure reasonable response times and minimal drifts from day-to-day testing.
Tables 3-3 through 3-7 summarize the results of the checks for zero
drift, span drift, and response time. The data in Tables 3-3 through 3-6
represent summary data for 24-hour zero and span drift checks. All drift
3-2
-------
POINT
NO.
1.9
2.8
C
3.7
4.6
DISTANCE
(% OF D)
10.0
30.0
50.0
70.0
90.0
Figure 3-1. Location of sampling points for
stratification check.
3-3
-------
TABLE 3-1. MONITOR STRATIFICATION TEST-STACK OUTLET
(1/14/85)
Traverse
point No.
Port B-lc
B-2
B-3
B-4
Port A-ld
A-2
Traverse
NO con-
centra-
tion, ppm
296
290
288
290
294
298
Reference
NO con-
centra-
tion, ppm
291
292
296
294
292
296
NO Devia-
tion,0 %
+1.7
-0.7
-2.7
-1.4
+0.7
+0.7
Traverse
02 con-
centra-
tion, %
4.6
4.6
4.8
4.8
4.7
4.6
Reference
02 con-
centra-
tion, %
5.0
4.8
4.7
4.6
4.8
4.7
02 Devia-
tion, %
-8.0
-4.2
+2.1
+4.4
-2.1
-2.1
Reference point is the sampling point located in the center of the sample
matrix.
Percent deviation .
Port used for monitor probe only.
""
* 10°-
Only two sampling points tested due to severe weather conditions. Port used
for moisture runs and manual Method 7 testing.
3-4
-------
TABLE 3-2. MONITOR STRATIFICATION TEST—OUTLET BOILER
(1/16/85)
Traverse
point No.
lc
2C
3C
Traverse
02 concen-
tration, %
2.82
2.79
2.97
Reference3
02 concen-
tration, %
2.84
2.84
2.89
02 Devia-
tion, %
-0.70
-1.8
+2.8
Reference point is the sampling point located in the center of the
sample matrix. The 02 CEM probe was positioned approximately 6 feet
into the boiler outlet ductwork. This point was sampled for each
test block.
cent deviation .
* 100'
Traverse points 1 through 3 were located at 1.5, 3.5, and 5 feet from
the duct wall .
3-5
-------
TABLE 3-3. TEST RESULTS FOR NO MONITOR 24-HOUR ZERO AND CALIBRATION DRIFT
(ppm NO except as indicated)
/\
Test
No.
1
2
3
4
Date (1985)
Start
1/15
1/15
1/16
1/16
End
1/16
1/16
1/17
1/17
Test time
Start
0800
1945
0800
1830
End
0800
1830
0800
1730
Zero reading
Start
(A)
-1.11
-1.82
-1.5
-0.8
End
(B)
-1.50
-0.8
-0.3
-1.09
Arithmetic mean (AM)
95% confidence interval (CIg5)a
24-hour drift, b %
Zero
drift
(C=B-A)
-0.39
1.02
1.20
-0.29
0.39
1.339
0.35
Span reading
Start
(D)
445.7
444.4
445.3
445.0
End
(E)
445.3
445.0
445.7
445.2
Span
drift
(F=E-D)
-0.4
0.6
0.4
0.2
Cali-
bration
drift
(F-C)
-0.01
+0.42
-0.8
+0.09
-0.75
0.823
0.18
CO
CTi
= °^ZL In (SXS) - (ZX.
n J n-1 ^, n
AM
24-hour drift =
+ CI
95
1000
x 100.
Zero drift
CI
3.182
95
J 4 (2.717) - (2.372) = 1.339
Calibration drift
CI
3.182
95
J4 (0.825) - (0.09) = 0.823
Note: Percent 24-hour zero and calibration drift must be less than or equal to 2.5 percent of span
value per PS2.
-------
TABLE 3-4. TEST RESULTS FOR STACK 02 MONITOR 24-HOUR ZERO AND CALIBRATION DRIFT
(ppm 02 except as indicated)
Test
No.
1
2
3
4
Date
Start
1/15
1/15
1/16
1/16
1985)
End
1/16
1/16
1/17
1/17
Test time
Start
0800
1945
0800
1830
End
0800
1830
0800
1730
Low-range
reading
Start
(A)
0.75
0.89
0.77
0.95
End
(B)
0.77
0.95
0.88
0.91
Arithmetic mean (AM)
95% confidence interval (CIg5)b
24-hour drift,0 %
Zero
drift
(C=B-A)
0.02
0.06
0.11
-0.04
0.038
0.102
0.14
Span reading
Start
(D)
14.02
14.10
14.08
14.14
End
(E)
14.08
14.14
14.06
14.09
Span
drift
(F=E-D)
0.06
0.04
-0.02
-0.05
0.008
0.082
0.090
Cali-
bration
drift
(F-C)
-
-
-
-
co
i
—i
aThe low-range calibration gas (1.003% 02) data were substituted for the zero drift check. The Data Test
monitor is set up on a calibration gas basis (no actual zero); zero readings are dependent on the low-
range calibration gas used.
JCI
0.975
95
n Jn-1
c% 24-hour drift =
Zero drift
AM
CI
95'
Calibration drift
CI
Qc
95
v|4 (0.018) - (0.023) = 0.14
CI
95
J4 (0.0081) - (0.009) = 0.082
Note: Percent 24-hour zero and calibration drift must be less than or equal to 0.5 percent of span
value per PS3.
-------
TABLE 3-5. TEST RESULTS FOR CO MONITOR 24-HOUR ZERO AND CALIBRATION DRIFT
(ppm CO except as indicated)
Test
No.
1
2
3
4
Date (1985)
Start
1/15
1/15
1/16
1/16
End
1/16
1/16
1/17
1/17
Test time
Start
0800
1945
0800
1830
End
0800
1830
0800
1730
Zero reading
Start
(A)
-2.00
-1.15
-3.60
-3.62
End
(B)
-3.60
-3.62
-2.80
-2.65
Arithmetic mean (AM)
95% confidence interval (CIg5)a
24-hour drift, b %
Zero
drift
(C=B-A)
-1.6
-2.47
0.8
0.97
0.23
2.94
0.63
Span reading
Start
(D)
460.3
452.2
455.1
454.9
End
(E)
455.1
454.9
455.1
455.3
Span
drift
(F=E-D)
-5.2
2.7
0
0.4
-0.53
5.39
1.18
Cali-
bration
drift
(F-C)
-
-
-
-
GO
I
00
'CI
95
0.975
ln-1
n
x|n (ZX?) - (EX.)*.
24-hour drift =
AM + CI
500~~
95
x 100.
Zero drift
CI
95
4 JT
J,4 (10.24) - (0.53) = 2.94
Calibration drift
CI
Qc
95
J4 (34.5) - (0.281) = 5.39
Note: Percent 24-hour zero and calibration drift must be less than or equal to 10 percent per EPA
Reference Method 10 (40 CFR 60, Appendix A, July 1984).
-------
TABLE 3-6. TEST RESULTS FOR BOILER OUTLET 02 MONITOR 24-HOUR ZERO AND CALIBRATION DRIFT
(ppm 02 except as indicated)
Test
No.
1
2
3
4
Date (1985)
Start
1/15
1/15
1/16
1/16
End
1/16
1/16
1/17
1/17
Test time
Start
0800
1945
0800
1830
End
0800
1830
0800
1730
Low-range
reading
Start
(A)
+0.82
0.94
0.78
0.89
End
(B)
0.78
0.89
0.90
0.89
Arithmetic mean (AM)
95% confidence interval (CIg5)b
24-hour drift,0 %
Zero
drift
(C=B-A)
-0.04
-0.05
0.12
0
0.01
0.126
0.136
Span reading
Start
(D)
14.15
14.15
14.05
14.07
End
(E)
14.05
14.07
14.09
14.07
Span
drift
(F=E-D)
-0.10
-0.08
0.04
0
-0.04
0.105
0.145
Cali-
bration
drift
(F-C)
-
-
-
-
co
The low-range calibration gas (1.003% 02) data were substituted for the zero drift check. The Data Test
monitor is set up on a calibration gas basis (no actual zero); zero readings are dependent on the low-
range calibration gas used.
brT 0.975
L195
n-1
I (EX?) -
L% 24-hour drift = | AM + CI
Zero drift
195'
Calibration drift
CI
v|4 (0.019) - (0.0009) = 0.126
J4 (0.018) - (0.0196) = 0.105
95 4 JT ' ' ' " ' ~ "^ 4 fT
Mote: Percent 24-hour zero and calibration drift must be less than or equal to 0.5 percent per PS3.
-------
TABLE 3-7. AVERAGE MONITOR RESPONSE TIME0
(seconds)
Test type
NO
°2
CO
co2
Upscale at
1105 (1/14/85)
2:00
2:05
2:30
2:30
Downscalec
2:10
2:15
2:45
2:45
Maximum response time is less than or equal to 15 minutes
per Performance Specifications 2 and 3.
Response time needed to record stable stack effluent reading.
cResponse time needed to record stable high-level calibration
gas reading.
3-10
-------
checks were well within the expected operating ranges of the monitors and
showed consistent analyzer response from day-to-day operation. Response time
checks are shown in Table 3-7. All monitors had response times of less than
three minutes for both high-level calibration gas and stack effluent readings.
Both response times and drift checks show consistent monitor operation
throughout this test program.
A three-point calibration was performed on each monitoring system to
cover the low, mid, and high values of the specific pollutant concentration
measured. This system check was conducted at the beginning and end of each
test day. Single-point calibration checks were performed between test blocks
when time permitted. Calibration gases were transported through the sample-
conditioning system and sample line as a system check and an indicator of
possible sample dilution or contamination. All calibration gases were Master-
Gas-Certified, which means the gas values were within ± 2 percent of indicated
values. Figures 3-2 and 3-3 present examples of analytical reports verifying
the values of cylinders used in this test program. Along with calibration
gases, zero nitrogen was used to zero all monitors and to purge sample lines
to guarantee a clean sampling system.
Data generated by the CEM calibrations (three-point and single-point)
were used to define calibration curves for each monitoring system. Each
calibration response had a chart division reading and a corresponding cali-
bration gas concentration (parts per million, percentage). A linear regres-
sion analysis of these data was conducted to establish the relationship be-
tween response and concentration, or the degree of correlation (linearity).
Figures 3-4 through 3-8 present example calibration curves. The linear re-
gression equations established for each monitor on a daily basis were then
3-11
-------
551 Scott Specialty Gases
J (ItVIVIUM ut
Scott Environmental Technology. Inc.
PLUMSTEADVILLE, PA. 18949 PHONE: (215! 766 8861 TWX. 510 665-9344
Pedco Env. Assoc. Inc.
lll<99 Chester Rd.
Cincinnati, OH h^,2k6
Attn: Dan Scheffel
326966
Our Project N
Your P.O. Nn • PEI8U9939-3610-13
Gentlemen:
Thank you for choosing Scon for your Specialty Gas needs. The analyses for the gases ordered, as
reported by our laboratory , arc listed below. Results are in volume percent, unless otherwise indicated.
ryi
A-6090
Component
Oxygen
Nitrogen
ANALYTICAL REPORT
Analytical
Accuracy.
t2%
Concentration
14.0902
balance
,
ryl Nn MH-1J408
Component
Carbon Dioxide
Nitrogen
Analytical
Arrur.ry
Concentration
10.122
Balance
Tyl M« AL-lt.527
Component
Nitric Oxide
Nitrogen
Analytical
Accuracy -2
Concentration
38.
ppm
Balance
Cyl. No
Component
Nitric Oxide
Nitrogen
Analytical
Accuracy -2
Concentration
201.9
Balance
Analyst
Approved By
Francis Hevill
!%• only UabiUty of tbto Compaay (or |u which tkilf u> comply wttb Ihte •a«lyri« AftU bt npUecmcDt th«r*of by tht Company without «xcn eo«t.
CERTIFIED REFERENCE MATERIALS EPA PROTOCOL GASES
ACUBLEND-- CALIBRATION & SPECIALTY GAS MIXTURES PURE GASES
ACCESSORY PRODUCTS CUSTOM ANALYTICAL SERVICES
TROY. MICHIGAN / SAN BERNARDINO. CALIFORNIA / HOUSTON. TEXAS
Figure 3-2. CEM calibration gas analytical report.
3-12
-------
ANALYTICAL REPORT - cont'd
Pedco Env. Assoc. Inc.
Attn: Dan Scheffel
ryi NO AL-9357
Component
Nitric Oxide
Nitrogen
ryl Mn AL-1Q721
Component
Carbon Monoxide
ijitrogeu
Cyl. No
Component
Analytical
Accuracy_l£*_
Concentration
99.*<0 ppm
Balance
Analytical
Arrurary ±2%
Concentration
199.6 pom
calance
Analytical
Accuracy—
Concentration
Analyst
pM,,. 1/7 /Bs
Our Project No.:
Your P.O. No.:_
rvl Nn AL-13026
Component
Carbon Monoxide
Nitrogen
. 326986
PEl8l49939-363'i-13
Analytical
Arcuracy ±27,
Concentration
39.1(7 rmm
Balance
Tyl Nln AT._llin
Component
Carbon Monoxide
Analytical
Concentration
1455.9 ppm
nitrogen luiltmce
Cyl Nn
Component
Analytical
Arrurary
Concentration
Approved By .
Francis Nevill
dohn San son
CERTIFIED REFERENCE MATERIALS EPA PROTOCOL GASES
ACUBLEND'"' CALIBRATION & SPECIALTY GAS MIXTURES PURE GASES
ACCESSORY PRODUCTS CUSTOM ANALYTICAL SERVICES
1W *mlr IMMUtr of Uk
Figure 3-3. CEM calibration gas analytical report.
3-13
-------
NOX OEM CONCENTRATION, 1/16/85
TEST BLOCK 4
X= Y-4.461
NOx ppm = CD-4.461
CORRELATION COEFFICIENT * 0.9999
200 300 400 500
NOX CONCENTRATION,ppm
600
Figure 3-4. Example N0y calibration curve.
A
3-14
-------
02 CEM CONCENTRATION, 1/16/85 _
TEST BLOCK 4
X = Y - 10.20
4.530
02 % = CD - 10.20
4.530
CORRELATION COEFFICIENT = 0.9993
468
02 CONCENTRATION,*
10
12
14
Figure 3-5. Example 02 calibration curve—stack monitor.
3-15
-------
80
70
60
2 50
oo
40
o
30
20
10
02 CEM CONCENTRATION, 1/16/85
TEST BLOCK 4
X = Y - 4.095
3.837
02 % = CD - 4.095
3.837
CORRELATION COEFFICIENT = 0.9993
j I I i
468
02 CONCENTRATION.«
10
12
14
Figure 3-6. Example 02 calibration curve—boiler monitor.
3-16
-------
90-
CO CEM CONCENTRATION, 1/16/85
TEST BLOCK 4
X = Y - 6.784
0.191
CO ppm = CD - 6.784
CORRELATION COEFFICIENT = 0.9999
I I I
200 300 400
CO CONCENTRATION ,ppm
00
Figure 3-7. Example CO calibration curve.
3-17
-------
C02 CEM CONCENTRATION , 1/16/85 _
TEST BLOCK 4
X = Y - 5.0
C02 % = CD - 5.0
4.520
CORRELATION COEFFICIENT =1.0000
I
6 9 12
C02 CONCENTRATIONS
15
18
Figure 3-8. Example C02 calibration curve.
3-18
-------
used to define pollutant concentrations for each specific test block. The
final data reduction was accomplished by taking an average chart reading for
every 10-minute period and determining the pollutant concentration by the
linear regression equation. Table 3-8 presents Op data reduced by using both
5- and 10-minute intervals. The data show that no significant difference
existed between the two data reduction time intervals. Tables 3-9 through
3-13 summarize the CEM linear regression data for each test block conducted.
The EPA supplied NO and Op audit gases for checking monitor response and
accuracy. These audit gases were analyzed daily throughout the test program.
Tables 3-14 and 3-15 summarize the results of the NO and 0? CEM system
/\ £.
audits. As shown, the NO and 09 CEM response compared favorably with the
X c
audit cylinder values.
As a final check of the NO CEM system, several stack samples were col-
J\
lected and analyzed according to procedures described in EPA Reference Method
7A.* Table 3-16 summarizes the comparative data. Results for the majority of
the Method 7 samples collected were within ±20 percent of the NO CEM values
A
recorded during the sample collection period.
Table 3-17 presents a comparison of the Op and COp results from those
test blocks for which both CEM and EPA Reference Method 3 data are available.
The CEM data represent average values for each designated test block. The
Reference Method 3 data were obtained by collecting a gas sample in a Tedlar
bag during the CEM tests. The gas sample collection bag was attached to the
outlet manifold of the CEM system. This guaranteed that identical stack gases
were analyzed by both systems. The difference between the Method 3 and CEM
COp and Op values were all less than 11 percent, which is considered a good
comparison.
48 FR, Reference Method 7A, pp. 55072-4, December 8, 1983.
3-19
-------
TABLE 3-8. COMPARISON OF 5- AND 10-MINUTE DATA REDUCTION INTERVALS
Test
block
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Date
(1985)
1/15
1/15
1/15
1/16
1/16
1/16
1/17
1/17
1/17
1/17
0, Boiler, % u
10 min
3.4
4.5
5.7
3.0
7.1
3.0
6.2
6.0
3.0
2.8
5 min
3.4
4.5
5.6
2.8
7.2
3.0
6.1
6.0
3.1
2.7
Percent dif-
ference
0
0
1.8
7.1
-1.4
0
1.6
0
-3.2
3.7
0, Stack, % u
10 min
3.8
6.5
6.1
3.2
8.0
3.9
6.4
7.0
4.6
3.8
5 min"
3.7
6.5
6.2
3.2
8.0
3.9
6.4
7.0
4.6
3.8
Percent dif-
ference
2.7
0
-1.6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Data reduced at 10-minute intervals.
Data reduced at 5-minute intervals.
Percent difference = 10 mi " min x 100.
3-20
-------
TABLE 3-9. NO.. LINEAR REGRESSION DATA
Test
block
la
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
No. of cali-
bration points
5
5
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
Y-intercept
4.218
4.218
4.493
4.461
4.528
4.528
4.530
4.530
4.530
5.117
Slope
0.1063
0.1063
0.1060
0.1072
0.1078
0.1078
0.1101
0.1101
0.1101
0.1071
Correlation
coefficient
1.0000
1.0000
0.9999
0.9999
0.9999
0.9999
0.9999
0.9999
0.9999
0.9999
aAll test blocks on 0-1000 ppm NO scale.
3-21
-------
TABLE 3-10. STACK 02 LINEAR REGRESSION DATA
Test
block
la
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
No. of cali-
bration points
4
4
3
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
Y-intercept
8.175
8.175
10.990
10.20
7.524
7.524
6.196
6.196
6.196
7.61
Slope
4.026
4.026
3.808
4.530
3.965
3.965
4.326
4.326
4.326
3.520
Correlation
coefficient
0.9990
0.9990
0.9991
0.9993
0.9999
0.9999
0.9994
0.9994
0.9994
0.9996
All test blocks on 0-25 percent 02 scale.
3-22
-------
TABLE 3-11. CO LINEAR REGRESSION DATA
Test
block
la
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
No. of cali-
bration points
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
Y-intercept
6.190
6.190
6.231
6.784
6.581
6.581
6.520
6.520
6.520
6.385
Slope
0.1886
0.1886
0.2002
0.1910
0.1880
0.1880
0.1874
0.1874
0.1874
0.1830
Correlation
coefficient
0.9984
0.9984
0.9999
0.9999
0.9999
0.9999
0.9999
0.9999
0.9999
0.9999
aAll test blocks on 0-500 ppm CO scale.
3-23
-------
TABLE 3-12. CO, LINEAR REGRESSION DATA
Test
block
la
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
No. of cali-
bration points
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
Y-intercept
5.50
5.50
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
7.60
7.60
7.60
8.370
Slope
4.81
4.81
4.52
4.52
4.52
4.52
4.61
4.61
4.61
4.294
Correlation
coefficient
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
1.0000
0.9970
0.9970
0.9970
0.9986
aAll test blocks on 0-20 percent 02 scale.
3-24
-------
TABLE 3-13. BOILER OUTLET 02 LINEAR REGRESSION DATA
Test
block
la
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
No. of cali-
bration points
3
3
3
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
Y-intercept
4.038
4.038
5.66
4.095
3.747
3.747
3.551
3.551
3.551
3.850
Slope
3.850
3.850
3.592
3.837
3.786
3.786
3.816
3.816
3.816
3.756
Correlation
coefficient
0.9995
0.9995
0.9998
0.9993
0.9994
0.9994
0.9996
0.9996
0.9996
0.9995
aAll test blocks on 0-25 percent 02 scale.
3-25
-------
TABLE 3-14.
SUMMARY OF NOY CEM AUDIT RESULTS
A
Date
(1985)
1/13
1/13
1/14
1/14
1/15
1/15
1/16
1/16
1/17
1/17
EPA audit
cylinder ID
LL4679
BAL758
LL4679
BAL758
LL4679
BAL758
LL4679
BAL758
LL4679
BAL758
EPA audit ,
value NO, ppm
50.2
304.7
50.2
304.7
50.2
304.7
50.2
304.7
50.2
304.7
CEM NOC
value, ppm
48.6
300
49.6
305
51.6
307
51.6
302
52
303
Percent
difference
-3.2
-1.5
-1.2
+0.1
+2.8
+0.8
+2.8
-0.9
+3.6
-0.6
aGas cylinders provided by U.S. EPA.
Audit values of nitric acid (NO) with the balance of gas being nitrogen.
GValues determined from PEI NO CEM system. All audit gases were introduced
at the sample probe.
3-26
-------
TABLE 3-15. SUMMARY OF 02 CEM AUDIT RESULTS
Monitor
location
Stack
Boiler
Stack
Boiler
Stack
Boiler
Stack
Boiler
Stack
Date
(1985)
1/13
1/14
1/14
1/14
1/15
1/16
1/16
1/17
1/17
EPA audit
cylinder ID
YD2644
YD2644
YD2644
YD2644
YD2644
YD2644
YD2644
YD2644
YD2644
EPA audit .
value 02, XD
3.51
3.51
3.51
3.51
3.51
3.51
3.51
3.51
3.51
CEM 02C
value, %
3.4
3.5
3.44
3.6
3.7
3.6
3.7
3.7
3.9
Percent
difference
-3.1
-0.3
-2.0
+2.6
-t-5.4
+2.6
+5.4
+5.4
+11.1
Gas cylinders provided by U.S. EPA.
JAudit values of oxygen (02) with the balance of gas being nitrogen.
"Values determined from PEI 02 CEM system. All audit gases were intro-
duced at the sample probe.
3-27
-------
TABLE 3-16. COMPARISON OF REFERENCE METHOD 7 AND N0¥ CEM TEST RESULTS
/\
Method 7
test No.
1A
IB
1C
ID
2A
2B
2C
2D
3A
3B
3C
3D
Date
(1985)
1/15
1/15
1/15
1/15
1/16
1/16
1/16
1/16
1/16
1/16
1/16
1/16
Time
(24-h)
1535
1543
1549
1552
1023
1032
1040
1045
1728
1733
1737
1744
CEM test
block
2
2
2
2
4
4
4
4
6
6
6
6
Method 7 test
result, ppm
206
198
220
239
242
260
233
241
176
166
194
231
CEM NO
value, ppm
260
250
250
260
276
266
257
257
236
227
236
246
Percent
difference
-20.8
-21.0
-12.0
-8.1
-12.3
-2.2
-9.3
-6.2
-25.4
-26.9
-17.8
-6.1
3-28
-------
TABLE 3-17. COMPARISON OF OXYGEN AND CARBON DIOXIDE RESULTS--CEM
AND REFERENCE METHOD 3 (ORSAT)
Test
block
5
5
6
8
9
Time
(24-h)
1521
1601
1725
1115
1315
Date
(1985)
1/16
1/16
1/16
1/17
1/17
CEM value9
02
7.6
6.4
3.3
6.9
4.2
C02
11.9
12.4
14.8
12.2
14.0
Reference.
Method 3D
02
7.0
7.0
3.4
6.2
4.6
C02
11.5
11.5
14.8
12.2
14.2
Represents average monitor value calculated for the designated test
block.
Represents data from Method 3 analysis (Orsat) of integrated bag
samples collected during the designated CEM tests.
3-29
-------
3.2 MANUAL TESTS—MOISTURE AND NOY
A
Table 3-18 lists the sampling equipment used to perform the moisture and
velocity tests and the calibration guidelines and limits. In addition to the
pre- and post-test calibrations, a field audit was performed on the metering
systems and thermocouple digital indicators used for sampling. Critical
orifices constructed by PEI were used in the dry gas meter audits. These data
were used to assess the operational status of the sampling equipment relative
to EPA guidelines. Results of the onsite audits are presented in Appendix B
of this report.
PEI personnel calculated the sample data on site. The data were re-
checked and validated at the end of the test program by computer programming.
Computerized calculations are presented in Appendix A of this report.
Table 3-19 presents the results of the NO (Method 7A) audit results from
A
the laboratory analyses. Audit solutions supplied by EPA were analyzed ac-
cording to the procedures described in Method 7A. The results indicate good
analytical technique. Table 3-20 presents the results of the coal audit
performed by Commercial Testing and Engineering Company. The audit coal
sample results show good analytical reproducibility. The sampling equipment,
reagents, and analytical procedures used for this test series were in compli-
ance with all necessary guidelines set forth for accurate test results as
described in EPA Method 7A* and in Volume III of the Quality Assurance Hand-
book.**
48 FR, Reference Method 7A, pp. 55072-74, December 8, 1983.
**
Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems, Volume
III, EPA-600/4-77-027b, August 1977.
3-30
-------
TABLE 3-18. FIELD EQUIPMENT CALIBRATION
co
i
to
Equipment
Meter box
Pilot tube
Digital
Indicator
Thermocouple
and stack
thermometer
Orsat analyzer
Impinger
thermometer
Mettler elec-
tronic balance
Barometer
Dry gas
thermometer
ID No.
FB-4
403
262
203
141
1-6
406
FB-4
Calibrated
against
Wet test meter
Standard pilot
tube
Millivolt signals
ASTM-2F or 3F
Standard gas
ASTM-2F or 3F
Type S weights
NBS-traceable
barometer
ASTM-2F or 3F
Allowable error
±5.0% pre-test Y
±15.0% pre-lesl AH
±5.01 pre-lesl Y
±15.01 pre-test Y
Cp ±0.01
tO.5%
1.5%
(±2% saturated)
±0.5%
±2"F
±0.5 g
±0.05 in.Hg
±0.1 in.Hg
±5°F
Actual
error
-1.77%
-1.82%
+0.39%
-13.89%
0.41%
0.22%
0.0%
0.3%
0.0%
1°F
+0.3 g
0.03
0.04
+3°F
+ 1°F
Within
allowable
limits
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Comments
Field audit
Post-lesl audit
Onsile inspection
Maximum devialion
Maximum devialion
oa
C02
CO
Maximum devialion
Maximum devialion
Pre-calibralion
Post-calibration
Inlel--maximum deviation
Outlet—maximum deviation
-------
TABLE 3-19.
NOV AUDIT RESULTS
/\
Sample ID
Audit 1
(EPA 1194)
Audit 2
(EPA 3636)
Audit 3
(EPA 5272)
EPA audit
value, mg/dNm3
50.7
471.3
953.7
Method 7A
results, mg/dNm3
59.7
477.8
955.6
Percent dif-
ference
17.8
1.4
0.2
'Percent difference - *«""
* 1M-
3-32
-------
TABLE 3-20. COAL AUDIT RESULTS
Sample type
Ash, %
Sulfur, %
Btu/lb
Carbon, %
Hydrogen, %
Nitrogen, %
Chlorine, %
Volatile, %
Audit value
9.52
0.9250
11,373
42.11
6.47
1.37
0.00
17.19
Coal
analysis value
9.46
0.9293
11,390
42.08
6.47
1.38
0.00
17.19
Coal analysis performed by Commercial Testing and Engineering Company.
3-33
-------
SECTION 4
SAMPLING LOCATIONS AND TEST METHODS
4.1 SAMPLING LOCATIONS
The CEM and manual emission tests were run in the No. 5 boiler exit stack
as depicted in Figure 4-1. Two sampling ports, 90 degrees off-center, were
located at least 6 duct diameters downstream and 2 duct diameters upstream
from the nearest flow disturbances in the 152-cm (60-in.) i.d. round stack. A
total of 12 traverse points (6 per port) were used to measure gas velocity and
temperature.
The EPA Method 4 (moisture) and Method 7 (NO ) measurements were made at
/\
a single point in the center of the stack. Constant-rate sample techniques
were used in each case. A brief description of the test and analytical proce-
dures used is presented in the following subsections.
4.2 CONTINUOUS EMISSION MONITORS—SAMPLE EXTRACTION, ANALYSIS, AND DATA
REDUCTION
Extractive monitoring systems were assembled at the stack outlet and
boiler outlet locations serving Boiler No. 5. The stack outlet monitoring
system consisted of NO , Op, CO, and COp monitors; whereas a similar extrac-
tive system for Op only was assembled at the boiler outlet.
Stack Outlet System
Figure 4-2 presents the stack outlet CEM system layout. A single 200-
foot Teflon sample line was used to transport the gas sample to the NO , 07,
/\ L,
CO, and COp monitors. Because of the severe weather conditions, the first 50
4-1
-------
1
*12.
(40
ROOF LINE i
-]
1
*3.1 m
\
- i
«9.
(32
2 m
ft)
rl
(10 ft)
r
|
m
ft)
1
(V
1 (
1.2 m
5ft)
»
4
{
1
hLC
m
|
rRfTs^ ^FfTTfiN
i/r\uoo- oLi/ 1 lun
^^— »1 2 m
x ><^ /C i-i \
/e° /V\ V3 TtJ
/ D & 0 \
|j ~ fc
i i MAMIIAI TFCTC;
V /^/ MAI'iUHL 1 to 1 i
rCM noriDE \.°{ l^yS^VurTiirtrv Jt Amr*"7\
LtM HKUBt — >.OvL_J-^ (METHOD 4 AND/)
2 SAMPLE PORTS
W 90° OFF-CENTER
10 CM (4 in.) I.D.
i
Figure 4-1. No. 5 boiler outlet stack.
- no scale -
4-2
-------
PROBE-3/8 in.
TEFLON CALIBRATION GAS LINE
1/4 in.O.D.'
3 WAY VALVE
S'S
APPROX. 150 ft
HEATED
BALSTON
COALECSING
FILTER
STACK
WALL
GLASS WOOL
FILTER
IFLOW HEATED infill SAMPLING
PLATFORM
S.S. CONDENSOR
50 ft HEATED LINE
•Vl
ROTOMETER[|LE|rDLE VALVflf
RUBBER HOSE TO PROTECT
SAMPLE LINES
5 WAY VALVE
CALIBRATION GASES I NQl - NOX ] | 02 | | CO
MANOMETER
tj
J TEFLON PUMP
SAMPLE MANIFOLD -1/4 in. TEFLON
ANALYZERS
\
-
EXHAUST
COg
Figure 4-2. Stack out1et--CEM system.
4-3
-------
feet of sample line was heated to 200°F to prevent line freezes. The gas
conditioning system consisted of an in-stack glass wool filter and an out-of-
stack heated Balston filter to remove participate, followed by an ice bath
condenser to remove moisture. The conditioned stack gases and calibration
gases were transported by a Teflon pump and were introduced to the monitors
through a Teflon manifold. Each monitor was connected to the manifold by a
stainless steel tee and Teflon tubing. Flow at the outlet of the manifold was
monitored to ensure that the sample pump was supplying a constant excess of
sample or calibration gas.
System leak checks and checks for zero drift, span drift, and response
time were performed daily on each monitor. Guidelines set forth in 40 CFR 60,
Appendix B, Performance Specification Tests 2 and 3, were followed during this
test series.
A three-point calibration check was performed on each monitor at the
beginning and end of each test day. This check covered the low, mid, and high
values of the specific pollutant concentrations measured. Single-point cali-
bration checks were conducted between test blocks to ensure proper monitor
response. Calibration gases were delivered through the gas sampling system
(condenser and sample line) as a check on total sample system integrity.
Upon completion of system checks and calibration of monitors, the sample
probe was inserted in the stack at the designated sample point. Stack gases
were purged through the sampling system for 10 minutes, or until stable read-
ings were achieved on the monitors. Data were then recorded for each desig-
nated test period. The particulate filters and condenser were cleaned as
necessary between test blocks. At the end of each test block, all monitors
were zeroed, calibrated (single-point), and prepared for the next test block.
4-4
-------
All CEM's used for this test series have linear response curves. The
three-point calibration conducted at the beginning and end of each day was
used to verify instrument linearity. Each calibration response had a chart
division reading and a corresponding calibration gas concentration (parts per
million, percentage). A linear regression analysis was conducted to determine
the relationship between response and concentration or the degree of correla-
tion or linearity.
The final data reduction was accomplished by taking an average chart
reading for every 10-minute period and determining the concentration by the
linear regression equation established from the monitor calibrations. Data
from the CL analyzer were also reduced for every 5-minute data period. A
comparison of 5- and 10-minute data reduction is presented in Section 3.
Boiler Outlet System
Figure 4-3 presents the layout of the boiler outlet CEM system. A single
200-foot sample line was used to transport the gas sample to the 02 monitor.
The gas conditioning system consisted of an out-of-stack Balston filter to
remove particulate, followed by an ice bath condenser to remove moisture. The
stack gas and calibration gases were transported to the 00 analyzer by the
analyzer internal pump. Flow at the outlet of the analyzer was monitored with
a bubble meter to ensure a constant excess of sample and calibration gas and
as a check on the pressure drop across the filter. Leak checks, calibrations,
and other system checks followed guidelines used on the stack outlet system.
Upon completion of system checks and calibration of the monitor, the sampling
probe was inserted in the breeching at the designated sampling point.
Stack gases were purged through the sampling system for 10 minutes, or
until a stable reading was achieved on the monitor. Data were then recorded
4-5
-------
TEFLON CALIBRATION GAS LINE
1/4 in. O.D.I
PROBE - 3/8 in.
SWAY VALVE S.S. TUBE
•TT HEATED
APPROX. 150 ft
BALSTON
COALECSING
FILTER
FLOW
ROTOMETER
VALVE1-
5-WAY VALVE
J S.S. CONDENSOR
RUBBER HOSE TO PROTECT
SAMPLE LINES
, SAMPLE LINE 1/4 in. O.D.
TEFLON
CEM TRAILER
i
do
02 ANALYZER
CALIBRATION GASES
1
RECORDER
BREECHING
WALL
EXHAUST
Figure 4-3. Boiler outlet—OEM system.
4-6
-------
for each designated test period. The participate filter and condenser were
cleaned as necessary between test blocks. At the end of each test block, the
monitor was zeroed, calibrated (single-point), and prepared for the next test
block.
The CEM used for this test series had a linear response curve. The
three-point calibration conducted at the beginning and end of each day was
used to verify instrument linearity. Each calibration response had a chart
division reading and a corresponding calibration gas concentration (parts per
million, percentage). A linear regression analysis was conducted to determine
the relationship between response and concentration, or the degree of correla-
tion or linearity.
The final data reduction was accomplished by taking an average chart
reading for every 10-minute period and determining the concentration by the
linear regression equation established from the monitor calibrations. Data
from this (L analyzer were also reduced for every 5-minute data period. A
comparison of 5- and 10-minute data reduction is presented in Section 3.
4.3 VELOCITY AND GAS TEMPERATURE
All gas velocities were measured with a Type S pitot tube and an inclined
draft gauge. A total of 12 points were used to traverse the duct's cross-
sectional area for determination of an average gas velocity value, as speci-
fied in procedures described in Method 2 of the Federal Register.* Tempera-
tures were measured with a thermocouple and potentiometer at each traverse
point.
40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Reference Method 2 , July 1984.
4-7
-------
4.4 STACK GAS MOISTURE DETERMINATION
The moisture content of the stack gas was measured according to proce-
dures described in EPA Reference Method 4.* Three tests were conducted during
the course of the test program to determine an average value for use in volu-
metric flow rate calculations. The Method 4 train used consisted of a heated
glass-lined probe with glass wool inserted to remove particulate matter and a
series of Greenburg-Smith impingers followed by a vacuum line, a vacuum gauge,
a leak-free vacuum pump, a dry gas meter, thermometers, and a calibrated
orifice. Single-point, constant-rate sampling techniques were used, and test
times ranged between 20 and 30 minutes.
Gas moisture content was determined gravimetrically by weighing each
impinger before and after each test.
4.5 MANUAL TEST METHOD FOR NOV
A
Flue gas samples were collected from each stack during the test program
and analyzed for NO according to procedures described in EPA Reference Method
A
7A.** These data were used to verify the NO CEM relative accuracy and to
A
provide additional quality assurance data for the NO CEM system. The sample
A
and blank solutions were analyzed in our Cincinnati laboratory.
**
40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Reference Method 4, July 1984.
*
48 FR, Reference Method 7A, pp. 55072-4, December 8, 1983.
4-8
-------
SECTION 5
PROCESS DESCRIPTION AND OPERATION
This section presents a brief process description of the test unit.
Included are characterizations of the boiler and flue gas recirculation system
and a presentation of the steam plant operating conditions.
5.1 BOILER UNIT 5
Boiler Unit 5 was manufactured by Riley Stoker in I960, based on a design
by Union Iron Works (now a division of Riley Stoker). The unit is a type "VO"
boiler rated at 90,000 Ib/h and equipped with a 10-ft-wide by 17-ft-long
traveling-grate spreader stoker. It was designed to fire Eastern bituminous
coal.
The design heat-release rate for the full-load grate is 703,000 Btu/h per
ft2, based on an effective grate area that includes a portion of the burnout
area under the projection of the front furnace wall (or 751,000 Btu/h per ft2,
based on the plan area above the grate defined by the furnace walls). Coal is
fed to the boiler by two Riley Stoker Variflex feeders, with no fly ash rein-
jected. Figure 5-1 shows the layout of Unit 5.
The spreader stoker projects coal evenly over the bed. The fine fuel
particles burn in suspension above the fuel bed, and the larger pieces of coal
fall to the grate for combustion in the bed. The grate travels slowly from
the rear of the furnace to the front, where the combustion is completed in the
burnout zone underneath the overhang of the front furnace wall. The ash is
5-1
-------
MECHANICAL
DUST
COLLECTOR
.•• .
•• • . . •• • • ' ,
• **•**• * ** u^P*
..;••:{:• • SPREADER"^
TRAVELING GRAE
• --
AIR PLENUM
FEEDER
•BURNOUT ZONE
Figure 5-1. Boiler Unit 5 layout.
5-2
-------
discharged off the grate at the front of the furnace and is collected in the
ash hopper underneath.
Combustion air passes through a forced-draft fan located in the lower
level of the boilerhouse. The air flows up to the air plenum beneath the
boiler and flows through the bed of coal on the grate. A portion of the
combustion air is supplied by an overfire air (OFA) system, which consists of
an OFA fan, piping, and a series of ports in the front and rear furnace walls.
The OFA system is designed to prevent smoke formation at low loads and during
rapid load increases.
The combustion gases travel up in the waterwall furnace and pass through
the convection section of the boiler, where one steam drum, one mud drum, and
additional watertubes are located. The flue gas exits the boiler and passes
through a mechanical cyclone collector, where the fly ash is removed from the
gas stream. It then flows downward through the economizer, is repressurized
by the induced-draft fan (which provides a balanced furnace draft in conjunc-
tion with the forced-draft fan), and is ducted to the stack.
Boiler feedwater in the economizer is preheated under pressure to approx-
imately 280°F by the hot flue gases. The feedwater exits the economizer,
enters the upper steam drum, and circulates through the watertubes of the
convection and radiant sections. The steam produced is collected in the upper
steam drum, exits the top of the drum, and passes to the steamplant header
(pressure control) system. The current operating pressure of the boiler is
175 to 180 psig of saturated steam, and the maximum design pressure is 250
psig.
5.2 STOKER GAS RECIRCULATION SYSTEM
The unique feature of Boiler Unit 5 is its flue gas recirculation system,
referred to as stoker gas recirculation (SGR). The SGR system consists of an
5-3
-------
SGR fan and damper, ductwork, and controls. Flue gas is extracted from the
hopper section of the mechanical dust collector (cyclone). The gas flows
through the SGR fan and is injected into the undergrate air duct/plenum down-
stream of the forced-draft fan. The two streams are mixed by a distribution
nozzle system.
The position of the flow control damper on the discharge of the SGR fan
is determined by a control signal from the forced-draft flow controller. In
the automatic mode, the SGR combustion control signal can be biased to set the
ratio of SGR to air; in manual, an operator can directly set the percentage of
SGR desired.
The SGR concept is intended to improve boiler operation through a better
mixture of fuel and air. Replacing a portion of the combustion air (21 per-
cent CL) with a larger amount of recirculated flue gas (about 5 percent CL or
less) may allow the stoker to operate at lower overall excess air without the
formation of fuel-bed clinker. Flameout occurs when the air flow is reduced
so much that the grate and fuel-bed temperatures increase and cause the ash to
fuse together.
The recirculated flue gas provides the required cooling that would have
to be provided by larger amounts of excess air in other boilers. The SGR also
provides the flow dynamics to satisfy the air/fuel mixing requirements for
combustion in the fuel bed. Recirculated flue gas can also be added to the
overfire air system to attempt the same excess air/mixing changes above the
bed; however, Boiler Unit 5's flue gas is recirculated under the grate only.
5.3 OPERATING CONDITIONS
Table 5-1 summarizes the boil.er process data recorded by the plant during
the test runs. The process variables monitored during the test program are
shown on the table.
5-4
-------
TABLE 5-1. BOILER PROCESS DATA
en
i
en
Test Block
Process parameters
SGR, on/off
Recirculatlon, h1gh/1nt./low
Steam Flow, 1000 Ib/h
.Air Flow, relative percent
VHndbox P, Inches H^O
Furnace P, inches H-0
Boiler Out P, inches H_0
Dust Collector Out P, Inches H-O
Economizer Out P, inches H.O
Steam P, psig
Header P, psig
Economizer Gas Out T, °F
Economizer Gas In T, °F
Economizer Water Out T, °F
Boiler 0~, percent
Undergrate 0~, percent
FD Fan, relative scale
ID Fan, relative scale
SGR Fan, percent
Steam Plant P, psig
Coal Feed, relative scale
Rear OFA P, inches H20
Front OFA P, Inches H20
Grate Speed, percent
12
On
High
90
88
+1.5
-.17
-1.9
-5.1
-6.2
180
175
4/10
613
283
2.8
10.3
7.7
4.9
29
170
8.1
30
20
17
5
On
Int.
90
88
+1.4
-.14
-1.8
-5.0
-6.2
179
175
448
Cll
280
3.6
18.6
7.9
7.3
16
168
8.5
30
20
60
15
On
Int.
67
66
+ 1.2
-.18
-1.1
-3.2
-3.9
177
175
392
550
278
2.6
17.6
5.8
4.9
15
170
6.0
30
20
26
7
On
Low
67
64
+0.9
-.19
-1.0
-3.0
-3.7
177
175
400
550
278
2.8
17.6
5.6
4.2
6
170
6.1
29
19
43
11
On
Int.
67
75
+1.2
-.16
-1.4
-4.0
-5.0
177
175
408
570
288
5.8
18.5
6.7
4.7
13
170
6.3
29
19
40
13
On
High
68
85
+ 1.5
<-.3
<-2.0
-5.0
-6.0
178
176
424
580
287
7.2
18.6
8.4
5.5
40
170
6.2
30
19
42
8
On
Low
45
51
+0.9
-.15
-0.6
-2.0
-2.6
174
176
368
490
275
6.0
17.8
4.7
2.5
3
168
3.8
25
15
25
3
Off
-
89
92
+0.4
<-.4
<-2.0
-6.9
-8.2
182
176
432
609
289
4.4
21
>10
10.0
-
170
8.1
27
13
30
10
Off
•-
68
58
+0.8
-.13
-0.8
-2.7
-3.7
177
176
384
520
275
3.1
21
5.9
4.7
-
170
5.7
26
12
26
14
Off
-
67
69
+1.3
-.13
-1.2
-3.8
-5.0
177
176
400
543
282
6.0
21
7.2
5.3
-
170
5.7
26
12
26
P = pressure; T = temperature.
-------
Only the steam flow, air flow (relative), economizer gas and water tem-
peratures, and steamplant pressure are continuously recorded automatically.
The other data were recorded manually every half-hour.
5-6
-------
APPENDIX A
COMPUTER PRINTOUTS AND EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS
A-l
-------
F-FACTOR CALCULATIONS
Equation No. 1
P 106 [3.64 %H +1.53 %C + 0.57 %S + 0.14 %N - 0.46 %0]
GCV
where:
F = a factor representing a ratio of the volume of dry flue gases gen-
erated to the calorific value of the fuel combusted, expressed as
dry standard cubic feet per million Btu of heat input (dscf/MM Btu)
H, C, S, N, and 0 = content by weight of hydrogen, carbon, sulfur, nitrogen,
and oxygen (expressed as %), respectively, and on a dry basis
GCV = the gross calorific value (Btu/lb) of the fuel combusted on a dry
basis
Test Block 1
P _ 106 [(3.64)(5.18) + (1.53)(75.97) + (0.57)(1.52) + (0.14)(1.73) - (0.46)(6.86)]
h 13,727
F = 9,692 dscf/MM Btu
Test Block 2
P 106 [(3.64)(5.11) + (1.53)(75.69) + (0.57)(1.52) + (0.14)(1.66) - (0.46)(7.83)]
h ~ 13,645
F = 9,667 dscf/MM Btu
Test Block 3
P 106 [(3.64)(5.23) + (1.53)(76.18) + (0.57)(1.46) + (0.14)(1.72) - (0.46)(7.82)1
r " 13,617
F = 9,772 dscf/MM Btu
Test Block 4
P 106 [(3.64)(5.23) + (1.53)(75.67) + (0.57)(1.56) + (0.14)(1.61) - (0.46)(7.77)]
f ~ 13,576
F = 9,749 dscf/MM Btu
(continued)
A-2
-------
(continued)
Test Block 5
P 106 [(3.64)(4.95) + (1.53)(71.99) + (0.57)(2.47) + (0.14)(1.66) - (0.46)(7.95)]
"" ~ 13,059
F = 9,660 dscf/MM Btu
Test Block 6
F 106 [(3.64)(5.14) + (1.53)(75.13) + (0.57)(1.86) + (0.14)(1.75) - (0.46)(7.37]
r 13,592
F = 9,680 dscf/MM Btu
Test Block 7
F 106 [(3.64)(5.23) + (1.53)(75.46) + (0.57)(1.69) + (0.14)(1.59) - (0.46)(7.64)]
h " 13,649
F = 9,683 dscf/MM Btu
Test Block 8
F 106 [(3.64)(5.22) + (1.53)(76.83) + (0.57)(1.53) + (0.14)(1.57) - (0.46)(6.62)]
" 13,827
F = 9,734 dscf/MM Btu
Test Block 9
F 106 [(3.64)(5.14) + (1.53)(75.56) + (0.57)(1.51) + (0.14)(1.57) - (0.46)(7.26]
h 13,559
F = 9,739 dscf/MM Btu
Test Block 10
P _ 106 [(3.64)(5.16) + (1.53)(76.60) + (0.57)(1.29) + (0.14)(1.63) - (0.46)(6.71]
13,628
F = 9,811 dscf/MM Btu
A-3
-------
NOV CALCULATIONS
A
Run No. 1A
VSC = 17.647 x (1963.3 - 25)( - ) = 1684.25 ml
CPPM = 5.225 x 10+5 () = 206 PPm
EEBB = 6.243 x 10"2 x 9667 x (2Q g°'93 oM) = °'278 1b N0/MBtu
Run No. IB
VSC = 17.647 x (1960.6 - 25)(- - ) = 1385.37 ml
CPPM = 5.225 x 10+5 ( 1335*37) = 19g PPm
EEBB = 6.243 x 10"2 x 9667 x (20 9°193 o^lies = °'267 1b N02/MBtu
Run No. 1C
VSC = 17.647 x (2052.3 - 25)(- - ) = 1791.63 ml
CPPM = 5.225 x 10+5 () = 220 ppm
EEBB = 6.243 x 10"2 x 9667 x (2Q g°l93 O^ = °'297 1b N0/MBtu
Run No. ID
VSC = 17.647 x (1951.3 - 25)(- - ) = 1571.86 ml
CPPM = 5.225 x 10+5 () = 239 PPm
o on Q n 71Q1
EEBB = 6.243 x 10"* x 9667 x (2Q 9.3 0^1571 86^ = °*332 lb N02/MBtu
(continued)
A-4
-------
(continued)
Run No. 2A
VSC = 17.647 x (2023.8 -
= 1363.62 ml
CPPM = 5.225 x 10
+5
= 242 ppm
EEBB = 6.243 x 10"2 x 9749 x (
2Q
= °'329 1b N02/MBtu
Run No. 2B
VSC = 17.647 x (2048.7 -
= 1638.51 ml
CPPM = 5.225 x 10
+5
= 26°
EEBB = 6.243 x 10"2 x 9749 x (
= °'353 lb N0/MBtu
Run No. 2C
VSC = 17.647 x (2038.4 -
= 1783.07 ml
CPPM = 5.225 x 10
+5 °
= 233 PPm
EEBB = 6.243 x 10"2 x 9749 x (
2Q
Q7^ = °'317 lb N02/MBtu
Run No. 2D
VSC = 17.647 x (2053.0 -
= 1678.02 ml
CPPM = 5.225 x 10
+5
= 241 ppm
EEBB = 6.243 x
of) o n
x 9749 x (2Q 9.3 Q)(1678
= °'327 1b NVMBtu
(continued)
A-5
-------
(continued)
Run No. 3A
VSC = 17.647 x (1960.2 -
= 1220.46 ml
CPPM = 5.225 x 10
+5
= 176
EEBB = 6.243 x 10"2 x 9680 x (
2Q
= °'238 lb N02/MBtu
Run No. 3B
VSC = 17.647 x (1950.8 -
= 1703.34 ml
CPPM = 5.225 x 10+5 (1703*34) = 166 ppm
EEBB = 6.243 x 10"2 x 9680 x (2Q g^s 0^1703*34 ) = °'224 1b NVMBtu
Run No. 3C
VSC = 17.647 x (1953.1 -
= 1739.09 ml
CPPM = 5.225 x 10
+5
= 194 ppm
EEBB = 6.243 x 10"2 x 9680 x (
2Q
= °'262 1b NMBtu
Run No. 3D
VSC = 17.647 x (1983.6 -
= 1605.96 ml
CPPM = 5.225 x 10+5 (
= 231 ppm
EEBB = 6.243 x 10'2 x 9680 x (
2Q
= °'312 1b N02/MBtu
A-6
-------
EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS FOR MOISTURE
Run M-l
1. Volume of dry gas samples corrected to standard conditions. Note:
Jny
AH
Vm must be corrected for leakage if any leakage rates exceed L,.
m a
p
Vm = 17.65 x Vm x Y barT+ 13'6 = 19.574
mstd m Tm
2. Volume of water vapor at standard conditions, ft3.
Vu = 0.04707 V, = 1.709
wstd lc
3. Moisture content in stack gas.
. Xtd +
v
std std
Run M-2
1. Volume of dry gas samples corrected to standard conditions. Note:
Jny
AH
Vm must be corrected for leakage if any leakage rates exceed L3.
m a
V = 17.65 x V x Y bar* 13'6 = 15.846
mstd m Tm
2. Volume of water vapor at standard conditions, ft3,
V = 0.04707 V. = 1.040
wstd xc
3. Moisture content in stack gas.
ws • ~V - +~v
mstd wcstd
(continued)
A-7
-------
(continued)
Run M-3
1. Volume of dry gas samples corrected to standard conditions. Note:
my
AH
Vm must be corrected for leakage if any leakage rates exceed L .
HI
p
/ = 17.65 x Vm x Y barT+ 13'6 = 23.235
std m
2. Volume of water vapor at standard conditions, ft3,
V = 0.04707 V, = 1.732
wstd !c
3. Moisture content in stack gas.
v - +~v
mstd wcstd
A-8
-------
Ni'.X t IH.II l.'Al A
SAMPLt LOCATION
SAMPLE ftPE
UPtRATUW
AMfUENf TEMP.(OEU.F)
BAK.PRHSS.TEST SITFUN.HGI
BAR.PHESS.RECOVERY( tN.HG)
UPJOHN K.ALAMA/UU, Ml
NO. 5 BUI LIU .STACK
NUX.
KB CB~
1H.
as..si
29.60
FIELD .DATA A_ND RESULTS TABULATION
ENGLISH UNI1S
IVt INITIAL FLASK VACUUM LEG1
IV2 INITIAL FLASK VACUUM..LEG?
IVT INITIAL FLASK VACUUM TOTAL
IbP UARAMETRIC PRESSURE TEST SITE
PI INITIAL RELATIVE P«I3SURE_
TI INITIAL FLASK TEMPERATURE
FV1 FINAL FLASK VACUUM LEG1
FV2 FINAL FLASK VACUUM LEG2
FVT FINAL FLASK VACUUM TOTAL
FBP BAKAMETRIC PRESSURE RECOVERY
PF FINAL RELATIVE PRESS.URE. _
TF FINAL FLASK TEMPERATURE
FF F-FACTOR
FR FLOW RATE.
OS UXYGtN PERCENT
VF FLASK VOLUME
VK REAGENT VOLUME
VSC SAMPLE VOLUME
PNOX MILLIGRAMS N02
CPPM N02 CONCENTRATION
ELHH M)<4.00 (DEG.F )
9667.00 (OSCF/MBTU)
39235tPOO_ (D3CFM)
4.000 (Z)
1963.30 (ML)
25,00 .. (ML)_
lbfll.25 (ML)
.6b4 (MG)
.2162E-01 (L.B/DSCF)
S7.9'iM (LU/HR)
.27B (LH/MllTH)
l.'Alt
HUN NUMBER
.SAMPLJNJL FLAS_K _NO^_
CLOCK TIMEtaa HR)
F-KACTOR(I>SCF/MBFII)
FLOW RATE(OSCFM)
METRIC UNITS
347.98 (MM.HG)
01/15/15
1A
TT
15'35
96h7.00
3.00 0
3933S.OOO
tt (MI1.HG)
744. 47~ fMH^HG)
?.l ^9_. (MM^HGJ
S.33 (OEG.C)
.00 (TlM.HG)
.00
751.840
__ 751.84JL
17.78
273. 74~
_1 111.016
(MM.HG)
(MM.HG)
(OEG.C)
(OSCM/MHTU)
(DSCMM) ____
3.000
1963.30
_ .25 iOO._
Ih84.?5
.664
. 206 J ...
26.2H9
.126
(X)
(ML)
(ML). ..
(ML)
(MG)
(£PM)
(KT./HR)
(KG/Hk)
-------
PLAN( - NAME AND CIf1
UPJOHN KALAMA/00, MI
If. 5 I 1 f ,\M LtAIJt
KH CK
tXAMPLE CACULAUONS
INITIAL FLASK VACUUM TOTAL
IVT = ivi + iva
IVT = . 13.70 +_. _.l2.flQ._s
25.70 (IN.HG)
1 A
SAMPl.t LOT. A I ION
NO. 5 Hi>ILL« STACK
INITIAL RELATIVE PRESSURE
PI = JBP - IVT _J
PI = 29.51 - 25.70 =
3.6) (IN.riG)
I
o
FINAL FLASK. VACUUM TQ.TAL __.
KVT = FV1 + FV2
FVT = .00 + ~ .00 =
FINAL RELATIVE PRESSURE
PF = FBP - FVT
PF = _. 2
.00 (IN.HG)
.&QO _ (IN.HQ ).....-. ._ 1.
SAMPLE VOLUME
VSC = .„! 7 ,647» ( VF-
+460) -PI / ( T I_t«<>P ) 1 _ .
VSC = 17.b«7 * ( 1963.30 - 2'i.OO) * (( 29.600/( 6« . 00 + 160 )) - ( 3.61/( 38 . 00 + fl6d ) ) ) = Ib84.?5 (ML)
CONCENTRATION IN LB/OSCF __ _ ______ _ ____
CLB = PNOX / vsc « 6.2*43 t -02
CLB = .661/ 1684.25 * 6.243 E-02 = .2462E-04 LB/DSCF
Cl)Ntti<.l RATION IM PAKTS Hbl< MfLLKrN
Ct'PM = PNOX/VSC*5.?a5E + (»S
CPHM = ,6h1/ 1684.25 * ^.
206.1 (PPM)
-------
EMISSION KATF. ir« LB
ELBH = PNOX / VSC *_FJL* 3.7456 ._..._._. ._
H-BH = .bb«/ 1684.25 * iv?3b.(H)(i * 5.7'l5B = S7.9Stt (LB NO2/HR)
EMISSIUN RATE IN LB N.oa/Mttiu . _. . _ . . .. _ . .. .._
ELHB = PNOX / vsc * 6.2a3E-orf * FF * (i'O.n/cHO.q-ud))
ELB8 = .bbH/ 1684.25 * 6.2'I3E-02 * 9667.00 * (P0.9/C20.9 - 3.000)) = .27B (LB NO«VMB1U)
-------
Ill:* HI Lli HATA
.1
r\>
PLANT
SAMPLE LOCATION
SAMPLE TYPt
OPERATOR
AI-UlIENT TtMP.(r>EG.F)
bAH.PRESS.TEST SI TK(TN.HG)
BAft.PKESS.RECOVERY(IN.HG)
UPJOHN KALAMA/IUI, Ml
NO. 5 UOILER STACK
_
KB CD
IB.
29.31
29.60
m INITIAL FLASK VACUUM LEGI
IV2 INITIAL FLASK VACUUM LEJG.2
IVT INITIAL FLASK VACUUM TOTAL
IBP BARAMETRIC PRESSURE TEST SITE
PI INITIAL RELATIVE PRESSURED.
ii INITIAL FLASK TEMPERATURE
FVl FINAL FLASK VACUUM LtGl
FV2 FINAL FLASK VACUUM LEG?
FVT FINAL FLASK VACUUM TOTAL
FBP BARAMETRIC PRESSURE RECOVERY
PF FINAL RELATIVE PRESSURE.._
TF FINAL FLASK TEMPERATURE
FF F-FACTOR
FR FLOU RATE_ _
02 OXYGEN PERCENT
VF FLASK VOLUME
VR REAGENT VOLUME
VSC SAMPLE VOLHMF
PNOX MILLIGRAMS NO?
CPPM IM02 CONCENTRATION
ELBH NU2 (.MISSION KAlK
fLBB N02 EMISSION K'ATF
FiF.LDj}AiA--AND RESULTS TABULATION . _
ENGLISH UNITS
11.80 (IN.HG)
. _.. IQ.OO. (IN.Hli). _
21.60 (IN.HG)
29.31 (IN.HG)
7.51 _ (IN.HIj)
23.00 (OEG.F)
.20 (IN.HG)
.00. (IN.HG)
.20 (IN.HG)
29.600 (IN.HG)
29.400 LJN.HG) ._ _
M.OO (DtG.F)
9667.00 (OSCF/MBTU)
39235_,000 (OSCFMJ
3.UOO (X)
1960.60 (ML)
25,oo__ IMLJ.
1385.37 (Ml.)
.525 (MG)
,23b5E-0« (LB/USCF)
DATE
KUN NUMBER
. SftMPLJMB FLASK NO.
ClOt:K TIME(2« HR)
F-FACTOR(OSCF/MBTIJ)
UXYUEN PERCENT
FLOW RATK(l)SCFM)
METRIC UNITS
299.72 (MM.HG)
IB
(MM.MG)
(MM.HG)
b.OO (OEG.C)
5."08"' (MM~.HG)
•j.0« (MM.HG)
7MM.HG)
17.78 (DEG.C)
273.74 (DSCM/M8TU)
.1 11 1.018 (P3CMM)
3.000 (X)
1960.60 (ML)
1513
9f.67 .00
3.000
39235.000
,2o7 (LB/MIUU)
13H5.37 (ML)
" (MG)
1PPM)
(KG/MR)
.121 (KG/MH)
-------
PL AN I - MAMK AMD CITY
UPJdnN KALAMAZOl', HI
IKS ( II AC. LLAIlFK
Kli Cl<
Kill) N(i
SAMPLl L'lCA I fOM
Nil. •j HUILL'R STACK
tXAMPLF. CACULATIONS.
TNI1IAL FLASK VACUUM TulAL
IVT = ivi » iv2 ~
1VT s. ll.80_+ .. _LO,.QQ. =
ai.ao C.JN..HGJ
INITIAL RELATIVE PRESSURE
PI =_JHP - IVT..._ ;
t'l = 29.31 - 21.80 =
7.SI (IN.HG)
I
_j
Co
FINAL FLASK VACUUM TOTAL
FVT s FVJ «• FV2
KVT = .20 + ~ """ .00 =
FINAL HELATTVF. PRESSURt
PF = FHP - FVT ' '".
Z
PF = 29.600 -_ .,10 =
.20 (IN.HG)
29,quo UN,HG)
SAMPLE VOLUME
VSC =.. 17.6a7«(VF-VRJilPF/_(TFt«bQ)-PJ/(TI-t-«bOI)
VSC = 17.(>«7 * C 1960.80 - 2b,UO) « (( 2
- ( 7.51/t 23.00*160))) =
(ML)
CONCENTRATION IN LB/DbCF _
CLH = PNOX / VSC * 6.213 l>0,e
CLB = .525/ 13B5.37 * 6.213 h-02 = .236bE-0« LH/DSCF
CONCENTRATION IN PARTS Pf.R MILLION
CPPM = PNI)X/VSC*b.2^5E>OS
. 37 «
(PPM)
-------
I
4S»
EMISSION HATt IU LB N02/HR
ELBH = PNOX / VSC *_FJL * 3,74.5.8 . . ... _ _
tLBH = ,5?5/ 13B5.37 * 3V^3^.000 * i.7'45fl = bb.673 (LH N02/HR)
EMISSION HATE IN LB NOS/HBTU _ .... „ .... __ _ _. _
ELBB = PNOX / vsc * b.ai3E-05 * FF * uo.q/uo.q-oai)
tLBH = .5357" I'SBS^SYT b'7«J43E-02 * 9667.00 * (20.9/(ao.9 - y.OOoT) = .267 (LB NOt?/MBTU)
-------
H IH I) I>AT 4
I
. en
IV!
iva
IVT
IBP
PI
U
FV1
FV2
FVT
FBP
PF
TF
FF
FR
02
VF
VR
vsc
PNOX
CPPM
LLBH
t'LUB
PLANT
SAMPLE LOCATION
SAMPLE ITPt
(IPfKATOK
AtiBltNl TEMP. (DEC,.F)
BAk.PRFSS.TFST STTF(IN,Hb)
BAK.PrtEbS.RECOVERr(IN.HG)
UHJUHN KALAMA20U, Ml
NO. 5 HOILtK STACK
_NOX
KB CH
16.
INITIAL FLASK VACUUM LE61
INITIAL f.LASK VACUUM LEG2L
INITIAL FL4SK VACUUM TOTAL
BARAMETRIC PRESSURE TEST SITE
INITIAL RELATIVE PRESSURE
INITIAL FLASK TEMPERATURE
FINAL FLASK VACUUM LEG1
FINAL FLASK VACUUM LEGg
FINAL FLASK VACUUM TOTAL
BARAMETRIC PRESSURE RECOVERY
FINAL RELATIVE PRES_$U!i£__:
FINAL FLASK TEMPERATURE
F-FACTOR
FLOW RATE _ __.
OXYGEN PERCENT
FLASK VOLUME
REAGKNT VOLUME
SAMPLE VOLUME
MILLIGRAMS Nil?
N02 CONCENTRATION
N02 t-MSSION RATK
M0<> tMISSION UAT6
29.60
.._FIELD_DAT4_AND RESULTS TABULATION .. .
ENGLISH UNITS
14.10 (IN.HG)
12..5IL .UN..HGJ_
26.60 (IN.HG)
29.31 (IN.HG)
,2.,M_ JJ.N.HGJL
(OEG.F)
20.00
.30 (IN.HG)
.10 {.IN.HG)
,«0 (IN.HG)
29.600 (IN.HG)
29.200 ilN.HG)
6«.()0 (DEG.F)
9bb7.00 (DSCF/MBTU)
39235,000 1PSCFMJ_,
3.UOO (2)
2052.30 (ML)
25.00. .(ML)
1791.63 (ML)
.755 (MG)
.2630E-Q4 (LB/OSCF)
61.916 (LH/Hk)
.r"97 (LB/MBTll)
UATE
KUM NUMBER
SAMP.L ING .FLASK.. NO.
CLUCK TIME(2<4 HR)
F-FACTOK(OSCF/MHTU)
OXYGEN P^RCE^T
FLO* RATE(OSCFM)
METRIC UNITS
358.14 (MM.HG)
. .31L..5JL _tMH.Hfi.J_
675. bit (MM.H&)
744.07 (MM.HG)
_6A.Ai _IMJ1.H£J
-6.67 (DEG.C)
7.62 (MM.HG)
01
1C
2A
9667.0(1
5.00(1
39235.000
10.16 (MM.HG)
751.840 (MM.HG)
_ 741.680 (MM.HG )
17.78 (DEG.C)
273.74 (OSCM/MBTU)
11 1 1.018 (D8CMM)
3.000 (X)
20 52. 30 "(ML)
1791.63 (ML)
.75S (MG)
220., I _ J.PPM)
2fl.UHS (KG/HR)
.13S (KG/HK)
-------
PLAfJF - NAME AND CITY TIS1 TTA'-'. IEADFK rtulv fill SAMPLF. LOCATION
IIHJOHN KALAMA70I), Ml Kti L'll 1C till. *
EXAMPLE CACULATIONS__ ._ .. . ._..__
INITIAL FLASK VACUUM TOIAL
IVT = IV! + IV2
IVT = H.10 t. L2.50_= 26.60 (Hsl.HG) ... _ _ _ .
INITIAL RELATIVE PRESSURE
PI = IBP - IVT .... _ _ ... ._.... ..... _ ._
HI = 29.31 - 26.60 = 2.71 (IN.KG)
FINAL FLASK VACUUM TQT.AI __ .. . ._. _. „.._.. _ .._.
FVT = FV1 + FV2
FVT = .30 * " ~" .10 = .40 (IN.HG)
FINAL HtLATIVE PRESSUKt
PF = FBP - FVT 7
PF = 39.600 - .AOL_=
SAMPLE VOLUME
VSC =.17
VSC = 17.617 * ( 2058.30 - 25.00) * (( 29.200/( 61.00»4f.O)) - ( 2.71/C 20.00+460))) = 1791.63 (ML)
CONCENTRATION IN LB/OSCF _
CLB = PMOX / vsc * 6.243 1-02
CLH = .755/ 1791.63 * 6.213 E-02 = .2630E-01 LH/DSCF
CONCLNFKA I ION IN PARIS IJEK MILLION
Cl'PM = PN()X/VSC*'j.22SE + Ob
: ,75'J/ 1791.63 * b.22u>E + Ob = 220.1 (PPM)
-------
I
•-J
^MISSION HATE IN LH NIWHR
t'LBH = PNOX / VJSC .* FR * 3.745H
EI.HH s .755/ 1791.63 * 3V23S.UOO * 3./45tt =
CLH NUP/Hk)
EMISSION R>TE IN LB
KLHO = PNOX / vsc * b.a^SE-oa * FF * (c?o.q/(ao.9-o
-------
NI'X H [El. U. DATA
00
PLANT
SAMPLE LOCATION
SAMPLE TYPE
OPERATOR
AMBIENT TEMP.(OFG.F)
HAk.PRESS.TEST SITF(IN.HG)
BAR.PRESS.RECOVERY(IN.HG)
UPJOHN KALAMAZlHI, MI
NO. 5 BUILhR STACK
KB CB
16.
IV!
iva
IVT
IBP
PI
Tl
FV1
FV2
FVT
FBP
PF
TF
FF
FR
02
VF
VK
VSC
PNOX
CHPM
ELilH
ELBB
29.60
.. FIELD J1ATA AND .RESULTS TABULATION
t NCI. ISM UNITS
INITIAL FLASK VACUUM LEGI
INITIAL FL_ASK VACUUM LE£2 _.
INITIAL FLASK VACUUM TOTAL
14.00 (IN.HG)
BAKAMETRIC PRESSURE TEST SITE
INITIAL RELATIVE PRESSURE
INITIAL FLASK TEMPERATURE
FINAL FLASK VACUUM LEGI ~
FINAL FLASK VACUUM LEGS. ._
FINAL FLASK VACUUM TOTAL
BARAMETRIC PRESSURE RECOVERY
FINAL RELATIVE PRESSURED. _
FINAL FLASK TEMPERATURE
F-FACTOR
FLUrt RATE_. _. .
OXYGEN PERCENT
FLASK VOLUME
REAGENT VOLUME
SAMPLE VOLUME
MILLIGRAMS NO?
NO? CONCENTRATION
NU2 EMISSION KATE
Mid EMISSION KATE
(IN. HP,)
(IN.HG)
?6.<)0
?1.00 (OEG.F)
1.20 (IN.HG)
1.00 (IN.HG)
2.20 (IN. HO)
a9.600 (IN.HG)
27.aoO...(I_N.M.G) - .....
64.00 (OEG.F)
9667.00 (OSCF/MBTU)
OQ._ IDSCf M) _______
3.000 (Z)
.30 (ML)
. 25.00 ._IM_L)_
1571.86 (ML)
.719 (MG)
.2JJ56E-04 (LB/OSCF)
UATF.
RUN UUMHER
..SAMPLING.. F-L.ASK ._MO^_
CLOCK TIME(a<( HR)
F-FACTOR((1SCF/M8TU)
HXYGEN PtKCENT . .
FLOW RATE(DSCFM)
MhTRIC UNITS
355.60 (MM.HG)
_ 31.4. J6_ CMH^tiSJ
h70.56 (MM.HG)
744.47 (MM.HG)
01/15/Hb
10
10KB
9667 .00
3.000
3S335.000
-6.11 (DEU.C)
30.48 (MM.HG)
25 ,AO_ fMM^MGl
5S.8H (MM. IIP,)
751.840 (MM.HG)
17. 7« (DEG.C)
273.74 (DSCM/MBTU)
1111.018 fDSCMMl ___
3.000 (X)
1951.30 (ML)
_. 25JLO-. CHU-L . -
1571.86 (ML)
.719 (MG)
_?39tO (P.PM)
30.497 (Kb/HK)
.146 (Kfi/ltK)
-------
PLAN! - riAN'E AMP CITr n.ST ItAn LKAIHI' I.'UM Ml. SAt'.PLK LOCATION
UPjnii[\i KALAHA70I1, MJ KH Cil 1U I.I), "3 ilUILtK !
EXAMPLE CACULATIONS .. . _ ..._._
INITIAL FLASK VACUUM TOTAL
IVT = IV! + IV2
IVT = .. 14.00 + _ 1_2_,40.= .
-------
EMISSION KATF IN LB N08/HH
tLBH = PNOX / VSC *_.FR_ * 3,.7458 .. _
tlMH = .719/ 1571.86 * 3V/'3S.OO(i * 3. 7458 = 67.a35 (Lit N02/HKI)
EMISSION HATE IN LB
fcLBH = PNOX / VSC * 6.243E-02 * ff * ( 20 .')/ (r?0.9-O2 ))
fcLHB = .719/ 1571.86 * 6,a«3E-0^ * 9667.0(1 * (20.9/(20.V - 3.000)) s ,32c.' (LB NOc?/MbTU)
ro
O
-------
mix t II i ii DA I A
ro
PLANT
SAMPLE LOCATION
SAMPLE TYPE
UI'hRAlUR
AMH1EM TEMP. (HER.F)
bAR.PRf SS.TF.ST SITF(IN.HG)
BAR.PRtSb.RECOVERY(IN.HG)
UPJUHN KALAMA/UU, (11
NO. 5 BOILf.R bTACK.
NOX
KB CH
19.
IVl INITIAL FLASK VACUUM LEG1
iva INITIAL FLASK vAcuuM_LE.G_2l±
IVT INITIAL FLASK VACUUM TOTAL
IBP BAKAMETRIC PRESSURE TEST SITE
PI INITIAL RELATIVE. PRESSURE
TI INITIAL FLASK TEMPERATURE
FV1 FINAL FLASK VACUUM LEG1
FV2 FINAL FLASK VACUUM LEG2
FVT FINAL FLASK VACUUM TOTAL
FBP BARAMETRIC PRESSURE RECOVERY
PF FINAL RELATIVE PRESSURE :
TF FINAL FLASK TEMPERATURE
FF F-FACTOR
FR FLOW RATE_. 1_
02 OXYGEN PERCENT
VF FLASH VOLUME
VR REAGENT VflLUME _.
VSC SAMPLE VOLOME
PNQX MILLIGRAMS N02
CHPM N02 CONCENTRATION
ELHH N02 EMISSION RATE
ELBB N02 EMISSION RATE
29.60
EIELD. J1ATA ANO.RfiSULTS TABULATION .
ENGLISH UNITS
12.60 (IN.HG)
TAL
T SITE
RE ._ _.
RE
L
23. SO
29.31
. 5..61
20.00
1.60
i. .to
3.00
(IN.HG)
(IN.HG)
_(1N._HG)
(OEG.F)
(IN.HG)
(IN.HG)
(IN.HG)
29.600 (IN.Hti)
. ab.bOflL (IN..HG)... ..
ha.00 IOEG.F)
9709.00 (DSCF/MBTU)
39279,_eOQ. (D_SC_FM).
3.0UO (X)
2023.60 (ML)
25.00 ._ (ML ). _
1363.6,1 (ML)
.632 (MG)
.2893E-o«.(LB/PSCF)
hH.l/Jl (LH/HIJ)
.3?9 (LB/MBTU)
DATE
RUN NUMBER
.SAMPLING FJ.AS.K _N.U^..
CLUCK TIME(21 HR)
F-FACT(IR(I)SCF/MBTII)
OXYGEN P_ERCENT . .
FLOW RATE(OSCFM)
METRIC UNITS
320.04 (MM.HG)
2L6^fa_ UJM^HGJ.
b96.90 (MM.HG)
7<14.07 (MM.HG)
01/16/rtb
2A
VV
1 023
97*49.0(1
3.UOO
39279.000
-h.67 (DEG.C)
a().64 (MM.HG)
.35a5b_ CMH.HGJ
76.20 (MM.HG)
751.840 (MM.HG)
17.78 (DEG.C)
276.06 (OSCM/MBTU)
3.000 (X)
2023.80 (ML)
25^0 _ (HL). _
1363.62 (ML)
.632 (MG)
292. .1 . (PPM)
30.9^6 (KG/MK)
.1^9 (Kfi/IIR)
-------
PLANT - NAMI AMD CITY
UHJC'IIN KALAMA£(I(), MI
II.S! IfAM LtADL'R
M CM
EXAMPLE CACULATJONS
INITIAL FLASK VACUUM TOTAL
IVT = IV! + IV2
1VT = 12.60 + .. _1Q.90_ =
.SO (IN.HG)
K'UN NO
SAt-'PLK LOCATION
UO. S UulLtK bTACK
INITIAL RELATIVE PRESSURE
PI = IBP - IVT .___
HI = 29.41 - 23.50 =
5.M (IN.HG)
ro
ro
FINAL FLASJ< VACUUM TOTAL
FVT = FV1 * FV2
FVT = 1.60 * " 1.40 =
FINAL RELATIVE PRESSURE
PF = FBP - FVT
PF = 39.600 -__ 3..0A- =
3.00 (IN.HG)
._ UN.HG)._.
SAMPLE VOLUME
VSC a.. J7,b«7*fyF.T.VRl«lPF/.iJF*4bO).-PI/n.Ltt6P))_ ________ _ _. ___ __ __________________
VSC = 17.617 * ( 2023.80 - 25.00) * (( 26.600/( fa«.00+<460)} - ( 5.81/( 20.00*460))) = 13b3.h2 (ML)
CONCENTRATION IN LB/DSCF.. _ ... . „ ____ _.
CLB = PNOX / VSC * 6.243 E-02
CLB = .63?/ 1363.62 * 6.243 E-02 = .2893E-04 LB/DSCF
CONCENIWATION IN PARTS Pt'H MILLION
CPPM r PN(lX/VSC*5.225E-»Ob
CPPM s ,h3?/ 13h$.fa2 * S.
(HPM)
-------
I
IN)
CO
EMISSION KATE in LH N02/HK
tLHM = PNO* / VSC *_FR__* 3.7458 . . .
tLHM = ,632/ I3h3.b2 * 39^7^.000 * 4.705B =
66.181 (LH
EMISSION HATE IN I.B
tLBB = PNOX / VSC * b.2«3E-oa * FF * ( «iO .^/ (^0 ,9-0
-------
(J(iX MEL!) I'AlA
3=
1
ro
PLANT
SAMPLE LOCATION
SAMPLE TYPE
OPERATOR
AMBIENT TKMH. (OEG.M
bAR.PRESS.TEST SITEUN.HG)
BAR.PRESS.RECOVERY(IN.HG)
ivi INITIAL FLASK VACUUM LEGI
IV2 INITIAL FLASK VACUU!
IVT INITIAL FLASK VACUUM TOTAL
IBP 8ARAMETRIC PRESSURE TEST SITE
PI INITIAL KE.LATIVE PKE.SSUR
TI INITIAL FLASK TEMPERATURE
FVl FINAL FLASK VACUUM LEG!
FV2 FINAL FLA_SJ< VACUUM L.EG2
FVT FINAL FLASK VACUUM TOTAL
FBP BARAMETRIC PRESSURE RECOVERY
PF FINAL RELATIVE PRE35UR
TF FINAL FLASK TEMPERATURE
FF F-FACTOR
FK FLOW RATE__
02 OXYGEN PERCENT
VF FLASK VOLUME
VR REAGENT VOLUME
VSC SAMPLE VOLUME
PNOX MILLIGRAMS N02
CPPM N02 CONCENTRATION
ELHH N02 EMISSION RATE
ELBB N02 EMISSION RATE
UPJOHN KALAMA/00, Ml
NO. 5 BOILER STACK
NOX
KB CB
18.
29.31
29. bO
LD .HAT.A AND. RESULTS TABULATION
ENGLISH UNITS
EG1 14.20 (IN.HG)
£62 _ 12jJIU_ (lN.JiGL_
OTAL
-------
PLAN! - NAME AND CltY
UPJOHN KALAMA7UU, MI
EXAMPLE CACULATION3.
IIMIIIAL FLASK VACUUM TOIAL
IVT = ivi * iv2
IVT = i4.20 +_ _
IK SI 1F/\M L I- A I) IK
KH CM
KliN Nil
cHt
SAMPl.t I. OCA! ION
'JU. 5 HUILL-K MACK
r>6.t>0 (IN.HO
INITIAL RELATIVE PRESSUHE
PI = LBP - IVT .
PI = 39.11 - 26.bO =
(IN.MG)
I
, f\J
cn
FINAL FLASK VACUUM TOIAI
FVT = FV1 * Fva
FVT = 1.40 * 1.30 =
FINAL RELATIVE PRESSURF
PF = FBP - FVT
PF = . a9.hOQ -.j .. a.60 =
.60 (IN.HG)
27.ooo._
SAMPLE VOLUME
VSC = 17
VSC = 17.617 * ( 3018.70 - aS.OO) * (( 37.000/1 64.00 + 460)) - ( 2.71/1 20.00 + 460))) = 1638.cjl (Ml)
CONCENTRATION IN LB/DSCF_ .._... _ _ ..._. ._
CLB = PNOX / VSC * 6.243 I.-02
CLB = .814/ 1636.51 * 6.?43 E-02 = .3102E-04 LB/OSCF
CONCENTRATION IN PARTS HEK MILLION
CPPM = PNnX/VSC*5.22^)E + 0'3
CPPM = .fll'4/ 163U.51 * 13.
2V). h (PPM)
-------
EMISSION KATE IN LB NU2/HK
ELHH = PNOX /_VSC_* FR « 3.7356 .. ...
ELrtH = .Hl«/ Ih3fl.51 * 39?/9.000 * 3.70SB =
73.112 (Lrt NO?/HR)
EMISSION RATE IN UB NQ2/MflTU_ _
ELHB = PNOX / VSC * 6.243E-0? *
ELHB = ,8ia/ 1638751 *
9749.00 » (ai).9/(20.9 -
3.000}) =
N02/MHTU)
I
ro
-------
I-JKI.I) I>MA
3="
ro
PLANT
SAMPLE LOCATION
SAMPLE TTPE
OPERATOR
AMBItNT TFMP. (OF.G.F)
HAk.PRtSS.IEST SITK(IN.HG)
BAH. PRESS.RECOVERYfIN.HG)
UPJOHN KALAMA/00, MI
NO. 5 BOILI.K STACK
NOX ._ _
KB CB
18.
U1/16/BS
29.60
F.IELD J1ATA .ANO RCSULTS TABULATION
ENGLISH UNITS
ivi INITIAL FLASK VACUUM LEGI
IV2 INITIAL FLASK VACUUM.j_6G2.
IVT INITIAL FLASK VACUUM TOTAL
IBP BARAMtTRIC PRESSURE TEST S~ITE
PI INITIAL RELATIVE PRESSURE
TI INITIAL FLASK TEMPERATURE
FVl FINAL FLASK VACUUM LEGI
FV2 FINAL FLAJK VACUUM LEG?
FVT FIIMAL FLASK VACUUM TOTAL
FHP BAKAMETRIC PRESSURE RECOVERY
PF FINAL RELATIVE PRESSURE
TF FINAL FLASK TEMPERATURE
FF F-FACTOR
FR FLOW RATE.. ,_
0? OXYGEN PERCENT
VF FLASK VOLUME
Vrt REAGENT VOLUME
VSC SAMPLE VOLUME
PNOX MILLIGRAMS N02
CPPM N02 CONCENTRATION
ELBH NO?. EMISSION RATE
ELBB NO? EMISSION RATE
14.60 (IN.HG)
. 12.60_ (IN.HG)..
e>7.2<) (IN.HG)
?9.31 (IN.HG)
*,M_ UN,HG)
?0.00 (DEG.F)
.60 (Ifc.Hf.)
.40 IIN.HG)
1.00 (IN.HG)
29.600 (IN.HG)
2H.600. (IN.MG)
hi.00 (DEG.F)
9749.00 (DSCF/MBTU)
39279, 000_ (OSCFMJ
3.000 (X)
203B.40 (ML)
25,00 (ML).
17H3.07 (ML)
,7'*4 (MG)
.27H2E-04 (LB/DSCF)
85.b'i9 (LH/HIV)
.317 (Lb/MMTII)
RUN NUMBbR
sAMHL.ING. ELAS_K_w.u^_
CLOHK TIME(?a HR)
F-FACTOR(OSCF/MBTtl)
(IX YUEN RtRCtfNT
FLOW RATt(DSCFM)
ME1IMC UNITS
370.84 (MM.HG)
AA
1U40
9749.00
3.000
39279.000
. OH (MM.HG)
744.47 (MM^HG)
-6.67 (DtG.C)
15.24 (MM'.HG)
25.40 (MM.HG)
751.640 (MM.HG)
17. 7B (OEG.C)
276.06 (OSCM/MBTU)
111?.. 263 (D3CMM)
3.000 (X)
203H.40 (ML)
.25.»OP._ (MLJ.
1785.07 (ML)
."794 (MG)
232._B (PPM)
29.737 (KP./HR)
.144 (KU/MR)
-------
PI AN I - fJAMF AMD CITY
UPJUHN KALAMA/00, MI
EXAMPLE CACULAriona
TNKIAL FLASK VACUUM TUlAL
IVT = ivi + IV2
1VT =... J4.bO t
Tt SI II AM LI ADI
KH Cl<
SAMPLF LOCATION
?»). fJ BOILl.K STACK
27.20 _ (LN..HG)
INITIAL RELATIVE PRESSURE
PI = LBP - IVT L
PI = 29.M - 37.20 =
2.11 (IN.HG)
I"!
IV)
00
FINAL FLASK VACUUM TOTAL, .
FVT = FVl * FV^*
FVT = .60 ••• .00 =
FINAL WELATIVE PRESSURE
PF = FBP - FVT ~
PF = ._ 29.600 -__. lL.OO.-=
1.00 (IN.HG)
28.6QO ._ (IN.HG)
SAMPLt VOLUME
VSC =_17.
VSC = 17.6<«7 * ( 2038.40 - 25.00) * (( d».600/( 6«.00 + 460)) - ( 2.11/( 20.00*46(1))) = 1/83.07 (ML)
CONCENTRATION IN LH/OSCF _
CLB = PNOX / VSC * 6.213 F.-02
CLB = ,79fl/ 1783.07 * 6.^43 E-02 = .2782K-04 LB/OSCF
CONCENTHATiriN IN PARTS H>EM MILLK.N
CPPM = PNOX/VSC*5.^25E+OS
CMPM = .Tit/ 17H.S.07 * b.^2'ie:
(PPM)
-------
EMISSKIN RATE IN LH
tLliH = PNMX / VSC * FR * 3.7454 . _ _.
ELHM = .7
-------
DATA
I
CO
O
PLANT
SAMPLE LUCATION
SAMPLE TYPE
IJPbRAIOli
AMHIENT TKMP. (flt-JG.F )
HAH.PHtSS.TEST SITF.(IN.HG)
HAR.PRF.SS.RECOVERYfIN.H6)
UPJOHN KALAMA/niJ, Ml
NO. 5 tiUILKR .STACK
NOX
"KB en"
29.60
FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
tNGLlSH UNTTS
IV! INITIAL FLASK VACUUM LEG1
IV2 INITIAL FLASK VACUUM LEG2
IVT INITIAL FLASK VACUUM TOTAL
IBP HAKAMETRIC PRESSURE TEST SITE
PI INITIAL RELATIVE PRESSURE
TI INITIAL FLASK TEMPERATURE
FVl FINAL FLASK VACUUM LEG1
FV2 FINAL FLASK VACUUM LEG2
FVT FINAL FLASK VACUUM TOTAL
FBP BARAMETRIC PRESSURE RECOVERY
PF FINAL RELATIVE PRESSURE
TF FINAL FLASK TEMPERATURE
FF F-FACTOR
FR FLOW RATE _
02 OXYGEN PERCENT
VF FLASK VOLUME
VR REAGENT VOLUME
VSC SAMPLE VOLUME
PNOX MILLIGRAMS N02
CPPM N02 CONCENTRATION
ELUH M)2 (-MISSION RATK
ELBB N02 t'lISSION RATE
14.40 (IN.HG)
I 2. .50 ._(IN.HG)
ah. 9(1 (IN.HG)
-------
PL AMI - i«AMt AND CITY
IJPJI1MN KALAMA/OO, MJ
H3I H M-i LtAlilR
K.'l Cf.
EXAMPLE CACULATIONS
INITIAL FLASK VACUUM TOTAL
IVT = ivi + iv2
IVT =_ 14.ao «•__ __L2..50_=
26.V0 (IN.HG)
I-'UII fJO
,'M)
SAMPLt LUC A I I UN
fill. S BIJILHK bTACK
INITIAL RELATIVF PRESSURE
PI = IBP - IVT
PI = 29.M - 26.90 =
(IN.HG)
I
LO
FINAL FLASJC VACUUM TOTAL
FVT s FV1 + FV2
FVT = 1.30 * ~ 1.10 =
FINAL RELATIVE PRESSURF
PF = FBP - FVT
PF = 29.hOO - 2.40 =
2.10 (IN.HG)
27.200 (IN.HP,)
SAMPLK. VOLUME
V
VSC = 1 7.6^7* (VF-VR)«,(PF/(TF*abO) -PI /(TI + 460))
VSC 3 17.647 * ( 2053.00 - 25.00) * (( 27.200/( 64.00+460)) - ( 2.41/( 20.00+460))) = 1678.02 (ML)
CONCENTRATION IN LB/OSCF _ .__.____
CLB = PNOX / VSC * 6.243 L-Oi?
CL8 = ,773/ 1678.02 * 6.243 E-02 = .2»74E-04 LB/OSCF
CONCENTRATION IN PAKTb PER MILLION
CPPM = PNOX/VSC*5.22bL+05
CPPM = ,773/ 1678.02 * '.i.i??SE+05 = 240.5 (PPM)
-------
I
to
ro
EM1SSICN RATC IN LB N02/HH
ELHH = PNOX / vsc *_FR_.* 3.745B ..._.__
tLHH = .773/ 1678.02 * 3^79.000 * :<.7458 = 67.731 (LB ND2/HR)
EMISSION RftTE IN LB NQg/M.Biy ..
ELHB = PNOX / VSC * 6.a
-------
PL AN I - UAMF AMO CITY
IIPJUHN *ALAMA2UO, M(
SI ff AM LtAlU H
Kh Cf.
WI IN JO
3 A
SAMPLt LDLATJUN
NO. b B01LLI< STACK
EXAMPLE CACUI.ATIONS
INITIAL FLASK VACUUM TOTAL
1VT = IV! + IV2
IVT r J2.tO ±_. _...!&. 7 0_ =
_ 22.»0 (IN.HG)
INITIAL RELATIVf: PRESSURE
PI = 3<».<)7 -
22.80 =
fa. 27 (IN.HG)
3»
CO
FINAL FLASK VACUUM TQTAU .
FVT = FV1 + FV2
FVT = 2.10 + ' ~ 1 .90 =
FINAL RELATIVE PRESSURE
PF = FBP - FVT
PF = ... 29.600 - _. 4.QO_ =
<4.00 (IN.HG)
.25.600.. (IN.HG1..
SAMPLt VOLUME
VSC =.17
VSC = 17. ba? * ( 1960.20 - 25.00) * (( 25.60()/( b
-------
CJ
cn
EMISSION KATE IN LB NOa/HK
tLBH = PNOX / VSC *..FJL* 3.715H _ _____
tLliH = .112/ 1220.46 * 3JSC95.0UO * ^.7a5tt = ai^.BSV (LB N02/HR)
EMISSION RATE IN LB Noa/MULU _. . . „ . .._ .__ _ _ _______ ___ _
Ll.HB = PNOX / VSC * b.243E-02 * ff * 120 . V/ (
-------
OOX KIH_I> MAlA
I
CO
CTl
IV!
PLANT
SAMPLE LOCATION
SAMPLE TYPF
UPEKATOK
AMBIENT TEMP.(DEG.F)
BAk.PKESS.TF.ST SI TF. (IN.HG)
BAK.PRESS.RECOVERY(IN.HG)
UPJUHN KALAMA^Ul), MI
Nl). 5 HOILER STACK
KB CB
17.
29.07
29.60
IVT
IBP
PI
Tl
FV1
FV2
FVT
FBP
PF
TF
FF
FH
02
VF
VR
VSC
PNOX
CPPM
F.I.BH
ELBB
FIELD J)ATA AND HESULTb TABULATION
ENGLISH UNI 13
INITIAL FLASK VACUUM LEGI 13.90 (IN.HG)
INITIAL F_LASK VACUUM LEJ2_ __ .. l£.flO_ CJN.HG)_
INITIAL FLASK VACUUM TOTAL
BAKAMETRIC PRESSURE TEST SITE
INITIAL RELATIVE PRESSURED
INITIAL FLASK TEMPERATURE
FINAL FLASK VACUUM LEGI
FINAL FLA.SK VACUUM LEG?
FINAL FLASK VACUUM TOTAL
BAKAMETRIC PRESSURE RECOVERY
FINAL RELj|TI.Yt.- PRE5_S_URE_. 1
FINAL FLASK TEMPERATURE
F-FACTOR
FLOW RATE
OXYGf.N PERCENT
FLASK VOLUME
REAGtNT VOLUME
SAMPLE VOLUME
MILLIGRAMS N02
H0^ CONCENTRATION
IJOi! FMISSION HATF
NOi! LMISSION kATF.
26.30 (IN.HG)
29.07 (IN.HG)
e.77_ tIN.HG.) _
IB.00 (DEG.F)
.10 (IN.HG)
.20 (IN.HG) _
.40 (IN.HG)
29.bOO (IN.HG)
. 29.301L QN.hG)._ _
b«.(M) (DtG.F)
9bflO.OO (DSCF/MBTU)
3189^.000. CflSCF.M_l__ ._
3.000 (2)
1950.«0 (ML)
2b.00__ (MLl
1703.34 (ML)
.511 (MG)
,19a4E-0«_ (LB/DSCF)
10.540 (LH/HR)
(Lb/MI)TIJ)
DATE
KIIH NUMBER
..SAMSUNG .EL»_SK_Ny.._
CLUCK TIME(24 HR)
^-FACTOR(OSCFXMBTU)
.OXYGEN PERCENT
FLO'.il RATE(DSCFM)
MF1HIC UNITS
3S3.06 (MM.HG)
Ol/lb/85
3B
ann
1733
9(>flO.UO
3.000
33895.OUO
fafart.02 (MM.HG)
73B.38 (MM.HG)
-7.78 (DEG.C)
2.54 (MM.HG)
7 .h^ (MM.HG)
751.840 TMM^,HG)
_ 7JI4..22J) .JLMR.HJU
17.78 (OEG.C)
274.11 (OSCM/MBTU)
959.805 (DSCMM)
3.000 (X)
1950~8
-------
- NAMK AND cnv
UPJOHN KALAMA^OO, Ml
tKSI IE'»M l.hADLK
KM Cl'
RUN JO
SAMPLE LfIC A I TON
NO. b OU1LLK STACK
tXAMPLE CACULATIONS
INITIAL FLASK VACUUM TOTAL
JVT = ivi * iv2
IVT = 13,90 .*. . U.4Q =
26., 30 (1N.HG)
INITIAL RELATIVE PRESSURE
HI = 18P_- IVT ._ ____ ___
PI = 29.07 - 26.30 =
2.77 (IN.MG)
I
co
FINAL FLASK VACUUM T.QIAI ._
FVT = FVl + FV2
FVT = .10 '«• ~ .20 =
FINAL RELATIVE PRESSURE
PF = FBP - FVT
•«>
PF = _ 29.*>OQ - .30..= .
.30 (IIM.HG)
HN.HG).
SAMPLE VOLUME
VSC = 17.fea7»(VF-VR)«CPF/(TF*q60)-PI/(TI*
-------
CO
00
EMISSION HATE IN LB N02/HH
tLBh = PNUX / VSC *_F_!L * 3.7450 _ _ _
tLHH = .SOI/ 1703.51 * 33H9b.OO(! * <.7tStt = «0.ji4ti (LH NU2/HK)
EMISSION RATE IN LB NQ2/M1U ._ .
ELBB = PNOX / vsc * 6.?«3E-o? * FK * (2o.'i
ELBO = ,541/ 1703T.34 * h.a43E-OS * 9600.00 * (?0.9/(?0.9 - 3.000}) = .224 (LB N02/MhfD)
-------
MIX f 1U.O DATA
I
CJ
VO
PLANT
SAMPLE LOCATION
SAMPLE TYPE
OPERATOR
AMBIENT TEMP.(DEC.F)
BAR.PRESS.TEST SITF(IN.HK)
BAR.PRESS.RECOVERV(IN.HG)
UPJOHN KALAMAZOUf Ml
Nil. 5 B01LEK STACK
.JSIOX . _
KB CB
16.
_. as.07
29.60
ivi INITIAL FLASK VACUUM LEGI
iva INITIAL FLASK VACUUM.LEG2
IVT INITIAL FLASK VACUUM TOTAL
IBP BARAMETRIC PRESSURE TEST~SITE~
PI INITIAL RELATIVE PRESSURE.
Tl INITIAL FL4SK TEMPERATURE
FV1 FINAL FLASK VACUUM LEU1
FV2 FINAL FLASK VACUUM L_EG? _.
FVT FINAL FLASK VACUUM TOTAL
FBP BArtAMETRIC PRESSURE RECOVERY
PF FINAL RELATIVE PRES§URl
TF FINAL FLASK TEMPERATURE
FF F-FACTO*
F.R FLOW RATE. _
02 OXYGEN PERCENT
VF FLASK VOLUME
VR REAGtNT VOLUME
VSC SAMPLE VOLUME
PNOX MILLIGRAMS NO?
CPPM N02 CONCENTRATION
CLBH N02 EMISSION K'ATE
ELB8 N02 EMISSION RATE
_FIELQJttAT.A__AND. RESULTS TABULALIIW
ENGLISH UfJlTS
14.00 (IN.HG)
_ _ . ia.5Q_ 1IN.HG.)..
26.50
29.07
_.. - 2.57
18.00
(IN.HG)
(IN.HG)
(I1EG.K)
.00 (IN.HG)
,00 (JN,HG)
.00 (IN.HG)
29.hOO (IN.HG)
. 3?. 6QO CIN.HGJ. .. _
61.00 (I)EG.F)
96BO.OO (DSCF/MBTIJ)
33895,000 (D b C F MJ ______
3.000 U)
1953.10 (ML)
25,00. (ML)
1739.09 (ML)
.647 (MG)
.«22E-0« (LB/OSCF)
«7.c'27 (Lit/Hit)
(LB/MIITU)
OATE
KIIN NUMBER
SAMPLING £LASK..NO...
CLUCK TIME(2fl HR)
F-h ACTOR(OSCF/MHTU)
OXYGEN PERCENT
FLOW RATE(USCFM)
METRIC UNITS
355.60 (MM.HG)
. 317, SO (MHTH61 _ _
673.10 (MM.HG)
7 38. ?F (MM.HG)"
65.26 (MM.HG)
-7.7B (OEG.C)
,0
-------
PLANT - NAME AMD CITY
UPJOHN KALAM»Z<)n, MJ
TE.SI TMM LEAOf.
KB CH
3C
SAMPLE LOCATTOM
NO.. 5 HOlLtR STACK_
FXAMP|,F CACIILATIONS
INITIAL FLASK VACUUM TOTAL
IVI = TVl + TV2
IVT = 11.00 + 12.50 =
86.50 (IN.HG)
I
-F»
O
INITIAL RELATIVE PRESSURE
PI = THP - IVT
PI = 29.07 - 26.50 =
FINAL FLASK VACUUM TOTAL
FVT = FV1 * FV2
FVT = .oT «•"
.00 =
FINAL RELATIVE PRESSURE
PF = F^P -~FVT~"
PF = 2
.00 =
2.57 (IN.HO)
.00 (IN.HG)
29.600 (IN.HG)
SAMPLF. VOLUME
VSC = 17.617*(VF-VR)*(PF/(TF<
VSC = 17.647 * ( 1953.10 - 25.00) * (( 29.600/( 64.00+460)) - ( 2.57/( 18.00+460))) = 1739.09 (ML)
CONCENTRATION IN LB/DSCF
CLU = PNOX / VSC * 6.243 E-02
i:LB = .64/7 " 1739.09"* 6.243 E-02 = .2322F--04 LB/OSCF
CUMCIIUTHATIUM TN PAKTS t>F.H MILLION
. (19 *
194.'4 (PPM)
-------
EMISSION KATF. IN i.u MUZ/IIK
hLHIl = »'NMX / VSC * FK * 3.7158
LLHM = .607/ 1M9.09 * ssnvs.oon * 3.7«ba = 07.2?? SCT/M~BTlJ)
33895.000 (DSCFM)
3.000 U)
19«3.60 (ML)
25.00 (ML)
1605.96 (ML)
".710 (MG)
.2760E-04 (LB/OSCF)
S6.131 (I.H/HR)
.312 (LB/MHTU)
DATE
RUN NUMBER
.SAMPLING FLASK NO.
CLOCK TTMF. (21 MR)
F-FACTGR(DSCF/MHTII)
_IJXYKEN_PER_C_ENT
FLOW RATE(OSCFM)
METRIC UNITS
01/16/85
30
3A
9680.00
_ 3.000
33895.000
353.06 (MM.HG)
312.13 (MM.HG)
665.48 (MM.Hb)
738.38 (MM.HG)
72.90 (MM.HG).
-H.33 (DE6.C)
30. a8 (MM.HG)
32.86 (MM.HG)
53. 3a (MM.HG)
75.840
698.500 (HM.HG)
17.78 (OEG.C)
27a.fl (fSCM/MBTU)
959.805 (D8CHM)
3.000 (X)
19]TF. 6^ (ML)
?5.QO (ML)
1605.96 (ML)
.710 (MG)
P31.0 (PPM)
25.461 (KG/HK)
.111 (KG/HW)
P
-------
PLAN1 - NAMf AMI) CITY
UPJOHN KAI.AMA70U, MI
TtST 1FAM LEAHKR
KB CH
MJ
tXAMPLF CACULATJONS
INITIAL FLASK VACUUM TOIAL
IVT = ivi + TV2
IVT = 11.90 + 12.30 =
(IN.HG)
SAMPLt LOG A I ION
NO.. 5 '30ILE» STACte.
3>
co
INITIAL RELATIVE PRESSURE
HI = IBP - IVT
PI = 29.07 - 2h.20 =
FINAL FLASK VACUUM TOTAL
FVf = FVI + FV2
FVT = 1.20 *
.90=
FINAL RELATIVE PRESSURE
PF = FBP - ?vf™~ ~"
PF = 29.600 -
-------
EMISSION RATE IN IB NU2/HN
frLBH = RNinx / VSC * FR * 3.7«58
f.LBH = .710/ 180S.9b * 33895.000 * 3.7158 =
5fo.l31 fLB N02/HR)
EMISSION RATE IN LB K'U2/MBTU
F.LRr» = PMMX / VSC * 6.213E-02 * FF * (20.1/(20.9-1
t|_BR = .710/ 16~05.~96~ *~6/243r-62 *"" 9680.n"6~ *~(2079/T20^9 -~
3.000))
.312 (LB N02/MBTU)
-------
Vr.l IT I 1 r li.i I 4
OAIK 01/IS/US
SAMPl IN i., l.'iCAllON NO. ^_'19JJ.EJ? STA_LR_
l^llfj liMMttl K V-(~>
CL'.'C* Il:v 111U
(IPh KA I (IK1 CH-KM
AMI'.lfclMT ItMP. (UEG.F) 17.
STAiir I'l'i-:>:>. (l U~H^>(I) " .«V ~ ~ ~ ~" ~
MOLf: CUL4I-1 '-veK.MT ?O.S«J
S1ACK I US I 1)1: Uli-1(Ir.') fid.OOd _
Pl'iol luui- i;ntFF.' ..«i ~ -• —
MOISlUMk Ci)urtrjT(X) 7.30
TKAVFKSk POSITION ~ ~VtTTTc"l T-Y ~ "~ ~&iACK"
piiit-Ji IWCHES HtAO TI Mf
>•'•«. (IN n20) (ni.r,.i••;
. o . i? o (i I (i.
u-0i» .o ,2\o - - - - ••- a^,3<
11-05 .0 .250 ySO.
^ H-04 .0 _ _.2_10 '45fa.
Ji U-O'j ' "."0 " .210" "" ".(til.
tn
lt-0') ,.<) ,1V il ^hr". i"!
A-01 .(i . Ijin 'Hb. _ jl'j
,j A-0(» .0 .".220 "
-------
I'LAUl IIP.IUIlr.i-KALAMAli.ll.>, ''.I
DA II- i;1 / I S/ilb
SAf-KI. f:.t, LOCATION 110. S OU1LEW
STALK AUtA, lii!. l-r. 19.6. _. Al^
STACK I,AS VliLHi: |IY, AC I . t'P.S 33.2
.; STAI..K t,AS V»l.li"H l»jl-T), ACT. CFM. 4l>'.>«;r) 20603.6
3>
-P»
n
-------
SYHnOl 3:
A'.-l A I K'OSJi-SKCT IONAL SlACiv AIM A, 3U IT
I'I'KI-S HAKHME I'HC PKIISSlM-'t, 1IJ i|C.
i'i I C i>H_1 A I'
UtA HIAMETEI! "OH'~C1KCUI.AR SIAI.K, IN
HIM) I ENGTM UF HECTANGMLAK STACK. IN
HIM? _ WIPJH_OF _?.ECJANGUI. AK SJ_ALK, IN
'•.iilSr i-'tiTSrilKh CONH-NT
I-'./, lillLFCIILAM WEIGHT
f:P "MiMlieH IIK_ JJJAVbJHSl PuINIS
U* " MOLF FRACTION WATEK
FTC PMtlT TMiiF COEhFlf.tNl
:.pht:S surir: Pi'Pt KA TUf t. Mti; t'
sfl'WE.'i 'STACK HHbSSUHE, In HI.
STVF.L STACK VELOCITY. AFPM
I t.MP (EMPEKATuRE, OfclyF
VH V/f-'LOCITY HEAD, IN M?O
SVI'IHW ,STA'-lfl«K!J VOLIIMtTKIC Kl.l''»
v(LLfL-l;_ _^[K.iJ_M^fc"\_1 JC_ fi.nrt (I'.tJJ, AI
.'jv/nuFLD ""'STAMOA«» "VOLUMETRIC FLU',-.-
(liKY), USCFM
I
-p.
IH.L
FiiK"iui.A.s AT.II ;-,AMPLF CALCULATIONS:
Sljr.' ISillil [VH_* lEMl'IJ
' --- "--.--.-- — -
NP
~* "Tsp^KsTT 3.6
S'H-' ISIKMP) _
MtMP = ------ - ---- - =
NP
----- « ----- = a<49.
1?
' 3'.' I
-------
, I .\LK VI I
I Y
PL AIM 1
DA ft:
SAMPL Pll-i
HUM I'IJMIJI
I.IICA I ION
IlKIOIIN-KALAMA/UU, Ml,
01/15/85
NO. 5 BOILER STACK
Cl.ilCK 1 I ! I '
Ol'f HA (Ok
AMHIINf IhilH.
BAR.I'HIrSS. ( ItJ HG)
STATIC I'l.'f ;iS. ( Ii
C»
A-OI
A-O£?
A-03
A -04
A-OS
A -On
M-0 1
H-oa
M-OjJ
b-04
11-05
H-Ob
."
.('
.0
.0
.0
."
. f»
.'>
."
_•"
. I)
."
.140
. 1 WO
.aao
.230
.a 10
. 1 MO
~\~l q'o
'.^30
.230
.210
.170
" 447.
455 .
458.
4f>(J .
45il.
44-1.
"450.
450.
45H.
45M.
451^.
198
-------
PL VJ I ItP.ltiHlM-hiALAr-'.A/llll. I
i)A I L U 1 / 1 5/iiS
3A"r'l. JM. I i/Ci> I ION NO. -j IIUILEK STACK
•STACK AKK.A, .->:;. II. 14. OjCi
STACK AI^S. HKKS., I'M HG. 2V .?_<.
-, STACK UAS IhMI'f kA fiiKt, Of.li.F 'IS3.
SUKTCVLL HI' X SlrtCK TRMP 4«S) _ 13.1
STACK I,AS V/l.t.DC I I 1 , ATI. FPS 3^.3
STACK bAS tfOLU1"!- d-.l 1), ACT. C»:l . il-.yln._3
••j STACK UAS VOLUI-'L (U"Y), ACT. CFK. 3b2737f>
..| STACK GAS VOLlMIt .,) -^9.92 IN. HG AND 68 OG. F
>i (IIHY)
•j " UTI) ~ " "
I
J^
vo
-------
. •: I
«!.•!• A i:i;nSb-3l CTIONAL STACK AIUA, .vJ >
•ii-KI.'i it A NOME TU J C PRfSSUII:, IN Hf;
i-M.r PI-LTA I'
IMA 1'IAMETER OF CIRCULAR '.MACK, IN
IMMI I ENHTH OF REC1 ANGI'LAK bTHfK, I fj
HIM? _ WIOTH UF J?ECT^ANG£LAH :>T_Ai:K, l.-J_
,-n'tsr " ^iii"sTu«V CONIEN'T " "
!••/: M(l|.hCULAK WEIGHT
r,i- _ l.'tlM|lhl£JIF IWAVtHISl POM. IS
H'. " MOLE F"RACflON WATEK VAPOt'
I'll.
..il'Kr-b
.->rf"t>
.sfpKfcJi
bfVfL
5>Vli|.FLrt
- L W
HITilT 1IIHE COEF F 1C t r
STATIC P'
-------
.'. I .U'.K '/I I i'i: I I t :< . I .1
PL
HATH
Sfl'"M. MCI; I. in; A I ION
UII'J MJrV.I K
HHMUHII-KALAHA/Ul.-, ri
(i t / I S / .-i b
NO. 5 HOILEIv STAf.K
CLIrO 1 l.lr
: UPt-it Ainu
AMiUHWT II Ml'. lOE'^.F )
! BAU.PKE.SS. I 1 N HG)
SI A 1 1C l'i;h <-,S. ( H-J 'l^fl)
: MUI. M:HLAK -t- II.HT
: .STACIV 1 U.'i lnl- II IMC 1 Nl
i pirur rmu: DDEFF.
MUISTUKK IJUI;TEUT(r)
TtVAVK.KSF. PirJITTON
('HIM lUCHf S
NO.
A-CJ .11
A-03 .0
A-03 .0
•f1 A - o a . 0
tn A-tCj .0
A -Ob .-•>
H-lll .'1
11-02 .'1
H-03 .11
H-oa ,ii
H-l>5 .11
Ii-Ob .11
1 7,'S
CM-KII
2r" .
?'l,31
.Sn
"< .
.130 37b.
.150 391.
.140 403.
.130 '407.
. 1 f.(\ 4 1 i).
.Ic'O iSi..
.130 3BO.
.140 39b.
.140 40S.
.140 '4 1 1 7 .
.110 40M.
3
AVLRAGI:
-------
Pl_.\i.'l OP.OIOf
1 1 * r t I) 1 / 1 -i / 1, ")
SA'iPl 1'A, UH AT I ON UP. S I'OJLErt STACK
|Jlii< '.'liviii- • : V- 'I
,«ji>. HI.
ADS. I'KKS., I '-J Mli.
STACK (iAS ItMPfii'A I'liKf , OCG.K
SUKFCVEL Hu X SlACr. H.MP AHS) _ 1 O^S
STACK GAS VI:l:)Cltr, «r:T. FI>S ?^.a
STACK UAS V(i|. lull: (Mr I, ^Cl. CF't. r^'IHi^f.^ _
STACK liAS VOLUME (IH
-------
I !\U.nL;. I \""i<
rKOSS-SecT IONAI SlAC* AI-'I4, SI: Fl
IUWC.-IP. rivic Pktbsm.t't IN m;
'"Fl. TA P
i':] AMH. rt iv OF" ciKCin Aft .STACK, in
IENGIH HF RECTANGULAK SIACK. I'M
•.•;ir)1H (IF KECTA_NGULAK SlftLK, IN
"
I: I: L''
'HA
DIM
I'|M,?_
Mn:jT
•••iiv
iv I-
FUKMIJLA.S Ai.li :iAM^LF C A LCIIL A T t (INS :
SUM (b'Ji< I (VH_* TF.MM I
nl;LP = --- -.-. --- .; — —"- — -
NP
'-'IJLI. CMLAK WEIGHT
>.!l!MHLI< UK '^AVHr^Sl
FkAc"TiON "WATKR"
• I
- en
. co
K.'J
.Sr.7) «77, j
I'lL PITOT IIJhE CUEFMitfll
bPhFb STATIC FM*E!>SURt r I''•
sii"!r _ STACK iF.'iPtkATuci , o» i. >
•STl'WtS STACK PKESSUKE, IN HI.
bTVEL STACK VELOCITY, AFPM
TJLHP TJf>iP1WAJyM' J^fl, F
VH VELOCITY ntAu, TN nan
SVIII.K.W STANUAkl) VliLUMtTKIU (-Ll.i-1 ( - M ) , AlF'-l
vni. I L;'J_ Vjll IJMH'T i/lC_ri__fiw (.-EJ'Jf AL't-f
SVHLFLD STAND A'R"l) "VOLUMfc f« 1C FLUK. (l)UY),
^'^ IN
SUM isn MPJ
.'--
IMP
ii7i.->.
3~.i)**;
Ai.'EA 1C IHflll AH STACK) =
. 'n'* u
Fl
•STVFL =
VDI.I-LlK
SVOI.FLW
85.<»9 * PTf * DEl.P
-^ — LT.tr."1!^' ---
SlJK1 f'lM';;" * STPP.ESI
Ml. * iiTVtj- * API. A = 0(1. »
VULFLIV * SIP«ES * i
* .«
-------
PL fiMI
,)A IF
SA -'PL 11"i", i iir AT i
Ull'i :.|H .':l-l >.>
(i 1 / H> / n S
rm. 5 r.'ULFJV MAI K
CHif.i I I- I i nil-;
OPh ''Al I'" CH-KII
AM|| || NT 1 f- -H'. (Of (-. ,f ) 1 i|.
HArf.l'l.'R.S.'i. I 1.J IIG) ?9.31
STMir PI.T:,?;. f rw"n?oi .'is
STAfr. 1'l:. 11'' r'M(!(il fn. (101/
PI IU1 lllfU filFFF. ".84
K roi-. IFNT(r) 7.
.n . l«u 'it'in.
.0 ".TOO " '
-------
PI. i. ,': I
HA IF
S»:i"l ti:i; I .
kll.v l:ir. !•.: I-
(ON
IIIM(lilN-K AL AKiZiH'. t-
01/1b/rtS
»n. 5 hOlLE" STAl K
S I ACK fcMF i , s., . t I .
STACK AHS. I'UIS., fl-i IIR.
STACK GAS Tl:*'PKWATl'«F» O
lift * STAC* TI-MP
STACK RAS »M-llii:ilY, ACT.
si ACK HAS VIM n!n c.t:i),
STACK GAS Vlll.l!"! (H'
-------
SYMIti'l. S :
': ^
i cln
'••''.'I S
'•I I i»
' I A
I- I Ml
I' II>V
i .list"
"hi
-Sl CTTTIN.',! " !51 Af.i: AM A, «i. iT
i Ti.-TC P"Vt SSl".F, II: nr,
I'
OF "C IPCl'l AK r;T,MK, [I.
I EMl.TH MF HEC T AN(;i LAK STACK, If
OK RFCTANGUIAK STACK, I ,M
'
I'Tr -
si-"i :i
•- II -.I-
sTf'i<'F:
s I v f L
i CULAK WE II,H r
i'Fi.1 fiF TkAVFiJSl Pi'Ml.'i
I FRACTION toftTl k" V4PU'
SViiLfl. W
""' ^ ! •'•' -
' SVCL'FLD"
i rr~Tn n E t f n E F i-1 f E~m
STATIC PWF.SKHRI , i v ':»
STACK ThMPM-.'A I'M f , HI I
'STACK PKFSSuRf, li, Mf.
STACK VELOCITY, Af PH
TEMPERA HIRE, J)FC, i
Vr.i..ir i TV TiFAoT i M" H"?H
STAfjhARi; VIM UMF T H 1C
~s TA w A'R?) Foi UMF T t-11 r. Ft o #
I '«!• f ) , All
' I SiJtn (VH * TFMt I I
--^ — --- — -
Ml'
1 ?
_ ___ ___ __
siFr-.P = ------ ._.._-;• ='" — " -------- - '<»/r?. hFr,"V ...... "
:-IP i ^
''3Tl'iH. * (DlA/r'i**^ " ':?.t"5'iM~* T Mu"(Ti) o"7 "?T**? "~
f. ..'f 4 (C T'vrill AP STACK) = --------------------- = -------------------------- = 1°.h>.S S'l FT
i 'i a .1 '* r").T I
\. * STVFL * Af-'l A = i.O. * V.7 * |M.^,-;S - _ _ _
W = VOLFL/J * STPPES * ( i^n. * 6«. ) jn^s«.-t * ?9.'i * .( 460. •»• 68.
----. ---- — ...- --------------- = ------ . — - — .__...._>._......._-_.._..
?'».<>3"*'~f^TFn;'h- +" \"/.'< » (i - .on =
M
I:
-------
IM:K
t I "i: ( I r n,-\ I
Oi
PL AM
OA It
SAMH. IM; LI 1C a r 1 UN
lUJi. iili'iiu-::
CLDLr. 1 1 i-l.
OPFKATflK
AMilIFUl 1KMH. IDfR.F)
BAK'.PKf 8S. ( 1 i'J HG)
STA r n: I'M.o.-'. ( i IM""H^OI
MUL t ('. HL*1' 'It- 1 til' 1
S 1 A C I-. 1 M S 1 : ) 1 1 1 1 M ( 1 M )
PI'IUT lUMt H.iEFF.
MOISTIIKh UOhltNT(«)
TKAVFWSE HO;; IT HIM
HDIfJl lU'CHKS
IMU.
A-01 .0
A-Oe? .0
A - 0 i .0
A-o1} ", n "
a-db .0
11-01 .0
H - o 3 . n
H-Oh .0
AVtKAGi.
01 /I h/HS
NO. 5 liUlLER STA( IV
V-f,
1 S'.n
CH-KU — .
.Sfa "" - - - - _ - ._.. _
h n. 00 1!
7.20
VELOCITY STACK
HfcAO Tl MM
( IN H20) ((SKC..K J
.130 s»to.
.170 " o ~ " " " '4?r". ~~ ~" ~ ~ ~~
.110 <4c?S.
.lc'0 <'M.
.170
-------
I'LANl
OA It
SAMI'l.
IIPJtlHiM-KALAHA/lllJ, f
01/16/it-3
NO. 5 HUILER STACK
.S I ACK A«KA, S'.'. h I .
STACK A8S. PKh'S.. M Hli.
STACK UAS IffurekATllU'F, O
HU A :ilrtCK TKMP
SUCK liAS VLU'C I IY. ACI. t:t'S
STACK liAS VdLim. t.'ll. 1). ACT.
STACK bAS VULUilC (OlvY), ACT.
STACK GAS VDLtlN'fc a ^9.93 IN.
(I'IVY)
11. 8
CFM. 3"1020.3
MR AND 68 06.
00
-------
i
: tn
•M'Pl S
I'tl. >'
I'tA
I'IMl
IUM?
i-l 1ST
^ n
r.HOSS-SECl IOIJAL SlACr. Af.'tA, MJ i: I
MARdMt H-'IC PKF.bSUIE, 1 1-1 'il'.
DLL I A P _
I'MAIiETE!-1 OF 'CIRCULAR ST/UiK. IN
LtNUTH IIP MECI ANG"LAI< STACK. 1 Iv
wln™_yr_£E_C_TAJviGlll. AR STACK, 1_N _
MIlfs'lURt CONTENT
:*III_I:CIILAK WEIGHT
I'll.
MM. I-.S
.-> 11 -1P
3TI-KKS
6TVEL
T_EMP
\/H
PITilT TUBE CnE>f
STATIC PKESSURL, IN ;i<
SI_AC_h TKM.PF.I'ATHl.'t.. \iK
STACK PKESSIlRt, l^ HU
STACK VELOCITY, AKPM
TEMPERATURE,_OtO ^_
VELOCITY HEAD, IN
VIILUMtTKlC
_ ___
MOLE 'F~RAC~TT5N"*«A~TlK~
SVliLFLO STANDARD VOLUMfcfKIC FLO:i fhKV). OSCFM
AI-JII SAMPLE CALCULA THINS:
SUM l!iljl< r IVH_* 1E_MI'H * '*}'*_ _ _ _ _ __
niiLI' =• ---- --- ."-..V."Z_ii"J"._."i- = --- '. — ___~i = ' n~(," ' ~
Nl' 18
sipi-'E's = 1 1 1 - iv t"a + ( s'p tf F~ i>Ti .-, .1 j "= "ti.?.! T i .sT/'A TiT ) = 29.3 uFTic
SM'i ISH.MPJ_ 091 ii. ___ _ _
hlhl^P = ----- - --- "-— ~ = — --- " ----- = "«09.'|)EU"F
hP 1,'
"?.iain * (OiA/,?-| **,• ~ '4 . Hi i ii"~* T {To."oTitT7t;T**2
A'.'i: .-• tc M-Tni. AW :>TAI:K) = --------------------- = --------------- - ---------- =
1 M a i <) q _ _ _ __ _
05. 09 * PTC * DELP M't.l'J * .H'4 * ll.o
srvi.L_ = ----- ""^T""~"""L~ _= ---- ^l — ~" ----- ---- - — = ga.i AFPM ___ _
"SOHi [Mlri *' ' StfRESl" "SI.IRTI U. * c'H.-'l » I4.t>\'j_ = ?'$1£7_.
-------
s i .\ c K, v 11 • • i.: i i r i >.. 11
IIATt
SA'-IHLliMi; I. Hi fl T ION
IIPJOIIN-KALAMA/UI, I'll.
01 /I 7/tib
NO. 5 HOILEK STAI:K
V-7
CLt/r* i i ft-, o
OfKKATllK CH-KB
AMUll'NT lt:r'C. (HE^.F) 20.
HAH.r«f. SS. ( IN HG) ?^.50
STATIC Pl.tS:-.. ( IN H,?(i) ' .Tl
MOLtrOL A'< t-.KIGnT i?n.37
STACK lig.MDh IMM(IN) hi).000
PITOI TUlib CilfcF'F. .Ml
MOIbTUKt UOMrtWT(X) T.^Q
1KAVEKSE
POINT
NO.
I'll:; IT ION
If'CHHS
VELOCITY
HEAD
(IN H20)
SI ACK
1 1-.MH
f>
O
A-lil
A-02
A-03
A -111
A - (i h
H-0-5
AVtKAGt
.050
,"ObO
.070
.,070
,OMF
±010
7050
.«60
.070
.070
.050
.058
• t>
55U
H>1.
311.
330.
1_«0.
3SO.
331.
h'
rj
f'
h
P
h
-------
CT>
PLANT UPJUMN-KALAK-A^IKI, MI.
l)ATt Dl/iy/.'l-j
SAMPLING 1.1.(. a THIN MO. f, HUlLEk STAl.K
rtU>: N.IM,)Ki< V-7 "
STACK AHtA, SU. H. in.b'-lb
STACK AMS. HKt'S., IN HG.
-------
Sr.:/'l'U~ CAI.CliL A I 1 l|!.
SYNI'.ni. S:
I
CT>
ro
fl.'f-.A
n-'KI-ft
I)M.IJ
I'M A
IMM1
l"'') f- f
HAPCMF IKIC Pl'KS.SI.KK , In Hi;
iil.l. TA P _ _
l)f AMETF.I?" ilF i:iKCUt."ST? SfACK," (N~
LENlifH UF H(:C1 ANGULAR STACK, IN
wlITTH UK KECTAiv'Gl'I.AU SlAf.K, IM
"Ulh fllKI. r.lir:ll;N(
'1i)| | CULAW I/if IGUT
OF
'PIC " f'lKIT TiirtF. CTlFFflCtlMT
SI'KFS STATIC PKRSf.lHVt, IN H,?0
,'. [h_HI'_ ti'ACK TEMPfcKATUKE, DEC- F
~S"fFt?LS~' ST~ACK~P*ESJ>iiR]T» "'IN HG ~
srvEi. STACK VELOCITY, AFPM
n-MP _ .Tt'M£§?An"JE, DEG F
'v>i 'VKLOCT'TY utAij, IN"HSO
SVUl.FLW STANOAWD VIJI.I.IMt 1«1C FLOW (MF_T), ACFM
_Vi'_Lf.l._W_ VOLUMETMC FLOW tWF.T), ACFM _
SVUI>LO" STANDARi) VOLUMETRIC FLOW (l)PY), DSCFM
A'>II'- .SAMIM.F i:Ai.f:iji. A r KINS:
SMMISUWllVH *
DFI.P = —^__._"_."._i"__-^_i^^;_^- = ^^.-ZT.'-^r.'
DP 12
H.^U f "T '
l.
— =
NP la
^.iiiib « (niA/?)*
A::KA(C I'
-------
APPENDIX B
FIELD DATA SHEETS
B-l
-------
Onsite Audit Data Sheets
B-2
-------
Audit Name:
ON-SITE AUDIT DATA SHEET
Date: / 'lo5
Auditor:
Equipment
i Meter box
ffo *\+ inlet thermo.
H Meter box
outlet thermo.
Impinger
thermometer
Stack
thermometer
(^Thermocouple^
f Er * ^*~Q ^^
Orsat
analyzer
Trip
balance
Barometer
Reference
ASTM-3F at
ambient temp.
ASTM-3F at
ambient temp.
ASTM-3F at
ambient temp.
ASTM-3F at
ambient temp.
ASTM-3F at ^
stack temp.
% 02 in
ambient air
IOLM std.
weight
Corrected*
NWS value
Reference
Value
Vf
3>'f
*+>r
WF
20.8%
kJ.fr
V*
Value
Determined
33'*=
5»'^
»•*
10°F
v°<
Deviation
+*'P
O'F
+*'r
O'F
..I
Max. Allowable
Deviation
5°F
5°F
2°F
7°F
See table
0.7%
0.5 grams
0.20 in. Hg
Reference temp. °F
Max. deviation °F
32-140
7
141-273
9
274-406
11
407-540
13
541-673
15
674-760
17
* Correction factor:
NWS value (in. Hg) - [Altitude (ft)/1000(ft/in. Hg)] + 0.74 in. Hg**
** 0.74 in. Hg is the nominal correction factor for the reference barometer
against which the field barometer was calibrated.
If it is not feasible to perform the audit on any piece of equipment, record
"N/A" in the space provided for the data.
B-3
-------
THERMOCOUPLE DIGITAL INDICATOR
AUDIT DATA SHEET
Date (~ lj-'~$'5~ Indicator No.
Operator
Test Point
No.
1
2
3
4
Millivolt
signal*
Equivalent
temperature,
CF*
?*-
1^0
&o
llrt
Digital Indicator
temperature reading,
°F
31
203
F4Z
ttW
Difference,
%
t- o .**& S
-*.tf ^
-e-io ^
-0.19
Percent difference must be less than or equal to O.B%.
Percent difference:
(Equivalent temperature °R- Digital indicator temperature reading °R)(100%)
(Equivalent temperature °R)
Where "R » "F + 460°F
These values are to be obtained from the calibration data sheet for the
calibration device.
B-4
-------
FIELD AUDIT REPORT: DRY GAS METER
BY CRITICAL ORIFICE
DATE:
?S
CLIENT: US£P4 -
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
ORIFICE NO. b
:^£/ in.Hg METER BOX NO. F&
PRETEST Y:
ORIFICE K FACTOR: 5*2 4 LlLW "^ AUDITOR:
AH(?
in.H0
Orifice
manometer
reading
AH,
in.H20
/.f
Dry gas
meter
reading
vv
ft3
7 // 00o
7£/.000
Temperatures
Ambient
Tai/Taf
°F
2B
Z^
Average
Ta-
°F
2%
Dry gas meter
Inlet
ojr
3*L
3-2
Outlet
Toi/Tof
°F
;*£
n
Average
°F
••^ j
34
Duration
of
run
0
min.
/2-'tf.6t
12. 7^5
Dry gas
meter
V ft3
J0.000
Vm
mstd'
ft'
ItJt^
Vm
mact'
ft3
/d.331
Audit,
Y
l.ttlf
Y
devia-
tion, %
07
Audit
AH(B,
in.H20
|.-2-«<8:
AH@ Devia-
tion, in.H20
0,01
m
std
17.647(Vm)(Pbar * AH/13.6)
(Tm + 460)
m
act
1203( 0 )( K )(Pbar)
(Ta + 460)
1/2
Audit
= ).0 15 Y deviation -
Audit Y
"std
0
Audit AH@ = (0.0317)(AH)(P. _)(T + 460)
Dar m
Audit Y must be in the range, pre-test Y ±0.05 Y.
Audit AH@ must be in the range pre-test AH@ ±0.15 inches H20.
x 100 = /. If
= 120% in.H20
B-5
-------
TRAVERSE POINT LOCATION FOR CIRCULAR DUCTS
Plant
Date
Sampling location
Inside of far wall to outside
of nipple
Inside of near wall to outside of,
nipple (nipple length) 7
Stack I.D. • &>°
Nearest upstream disturbance
Nearest downstream disturbance
Calculated by _j
dd
SCHEMATIC OF SAMPLING LOCATION
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
/
A
J
*
s-
b
fHACTKJN
OF HACK I.D.
,0¥4
,/4k
<&?&
.7o4
.r&t
. 9^6>
STACK 1.0.
fa"
"II
S
1 t
\ V
X \
«-
PRODUCT Of
COLIMNSIMD3
(TO NEAREST I/I INCH)
2.44
q.ito ,
17, 7A
ALIA
51.74
5T«3fe
NIPPLE
LENGTH
1"
i >
ii
1 V
1 %
It
TRAVERSE POINT LOCATION
MOM OUTSIDE Of NIPPLE
(SUM OF COLUMNS 4 I S)
7 ^
/5*%
Z4 %
f
-------
CAS VELOCITY AND VOLUME DATA
PLANT AND CITY
RUN DATE
It
TT1 J'• *o
2.
SAMPLING LOCATION
/r
/\/< ^ /6s //,->' xtfaf
CLOCK
TIME
'? ''^
4f * f 66 ' 69
RUN
NUMBER
M-l
OPERATOR
CA-*A
AMB. TEMP.
(eF)
**-.
BAR. PRESS
(in. Hg)^,
W &
^Jmt-f,
STATIC PRESS
(in. HjO)
- o.?^
31
33
MOLECULAR
WT.
. **. .
STACK INSIDE DIMENSION (in.)
3IAM OH SIDE 1
.&/?. . .
SIDE 2
PI TOT
TUBE Cp
M
MOISTURE
%
/!o. ,
40 ** i8 61 64 67 70 73 7(
i
FIELD DATA
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
7.8.9 ,10
4-j
A.
3
f
S
f
/i j
7 i
if
V
jf
L
POSITION
(in.)
11 ,1 ? ,13 • 14
VELOCITY
HEAD
(Ap ) , in.HjO
75i26e?7,je .29
.*.£
'/k
-n
•J7
it~
S;*L
•/^
./*
i7
,/7
•'/
/Z
J
STACK
TEMP, °F
3 8 . 3 9 . 4 a . 4 1
3¥V
a.]^
r'&
r^
f^-i
¥/&
^\'j
Y*7
¥**?
Lt/f(
t*L
ffi
-
. 24
B-7
-------
CAS VELOCITY AND VOLUME DATA
2.
MOLECULAR
WT.
2.0.4*
STACK INSIDE DIMENSION (in.)
3IAM OH SIDE 1
SIDE 2
PI TOT
TUBE Cp
61
FIELD DATA
67 70
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
7 . B . 9 ,10
e--'
JL
3
J .
^
^
Jt-^t
JL
3
y ^
^ ^
4~"~
POSITION
(in.)
n ,12 ,i3»u
_*
-*^~
VELOCITY
HEAD
(Aps) , in.H20
72,26077,28 ,2V
-'7
.-aLl
.nr
.2.4
:isf
^a ./
-------
GAS VELOCITY AND VOLUME DATA
PLANT AND CITY
RUN DATE
i-"
14 1'
2.
SAMPLING LOCATION
CLOCK
TIME
42
RUN
NUMBER
OPERATOR
AMB. TEMP.
BAR. PRESS
(in. Hg)
STATIC PRESS
(in. H20)
36
MOLECULAR
WT.
STACK INSIDE DIMENSION (in.)
)IAM OR SIDE 1
SIDE 2
PI TOT
TUBE Cp
40
FIELD DATA
B-9
MOISTURE
73
76
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
7.8.9 .10
A - f
a.
3
*
f
6
^i /
•f-
JT'
&
POSITION
(in.)
M ,1? .13*14
VELOCITY
HEAD
(Ap ) , in.HjO
?J,26e27,?8 ,29
,/g
2jJ^-
.2.3
3.1
j'1
* f ' &
/s
1*3
'/US
Ax-T
i/*T
STACK
TEMP, CF
38,39,40,41
#3f
Wf
y££^
fff
¥&o
-------
6
GAS VELOCITY AND VOLUME DATA
PLANT AND CITY
RUN DATE
J4/ 37 40/
2.
SAMPLING LOCATION
CLOCK
TIME
12
66 69
RUN
NUMBER
OPERATOR
AMB. TEMP.
CF)
BAR. PRESS
(in. Hg)
^^ ^^^f '
\-«=±J I
STATIC PRESS
(in. HO)
3E
MOLECULAR
WT.
.^.ff
STACK INSIDE DIMENSION (in.)
DIAM OR SIDE 1
. 6*. . .
SIDE 2
• , • . i
PI TOT
TUBE Cp
,*i
MOISTURE
%
ffi
40 •Vl44 i8 *' 64 67 70 73 7.^7<
FIELD DATA
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
7.8.9 .10
A-1
2-
5
¥
4T
Z
£-<
JL
3
•f-
5
<••
POSITION
(in.)
1 1 .1 2 ,13 »U
VELOCITY
HEAD
(Ap ) , in.H2O
75,26«J7,2B ,29
./^
./3
./<"
./it
t\
./T~-
.»v-
.13
.if
- "/
./^
.11
STACK
TEMP, °F
38 ,3 9 ,40 .41
*>72^
37JT
39/
f/o3
^r
y/b
S^o
0&£>
39*
Vvf
fe>?
Wf
••
B-10
I
-------
,— ; ~>
GAS VELOCITY AND VOLUME DATA
PLANT AND CITY
RUN DATE
M
it' 17
2.
SAMPLING LOCATION
4j
CLOCK
TIME
66
69
RUN
NUMBER
OPERATOR
AMB. TEMP.
CF)
BAR. PRESS
(in. Hg)
STATIC PRESS
(in. HO)
+ 0.9 b
STACK INSIDE DIMENSION (in.)
36
FIELD DATA
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
7.8.9 .10
&-1
A.
3
*•
i
4»
4- '
JL
a
V
Y
4>
POSITION
(in.)
11 ,1 ? ,1 3 • 1<
VELOCITY
HEAD
(Ap ) , in.H20
?5i26e27,28 ,29
./¥
.3*
i*$
il
,a-a-
.X'
.a-'
.2-y
.z^
.i*>
1 . 2-6
.t.4
STACK
TEMP, °F
38,39,40 ,41
v
-------
GAS VELOCITY AND VOLUME DATA
PLANT AND CITY
RUN DATE
14 17
2.
SAMPLING LOCATION
/ >" ^ '/
CLOCK
TIME
//'/tf
4} ' 66 69
RUN
NUMBER
v-t
OPERATOR
l<&- kA
AMB. TEMP.
(*F)
,/f,
/£»/ /;? -7/?f /^V
BAR. PRESS
(in. Hg)
£.1 .2 7
STATIC PRESS
(in. H20)
-« e/^
17 28 31 33 36
&*
MOLECULAR
WT.
. H.4.P-7
STACK INSIDE DIMENSION (in.)
3IAM OH SIDE 1
d tf .
SIDE 2
, , • , i
PI TOT
TUBE Cp
$^
MOISTURE
<^f i^
** £^^^f
40 « 38 41 64 67 70 73 7f
FIELD DATA
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
7 . 8 . 9 ,10
$-1
*.
3
H .
f
«y
tt-~\
^
3
i
f
la
POSITION
(in.)
1 1 ,1 2 ,13 «M
VELOCITY
HEAD
(Ap ) , in.HjO
?5iJ6«77.28 ,29
./2J
-t'1
.If,
./<)
;/4-
^/4f
./^
• >¥•
*/7
•/*•'
./7
./<-
STACK
TEMP, °F
38.39,40 ,41
^<
3*?
^^/
Y>£
ifZ2~
*-j^r
sfe
i
-------
GAS VELOCITY AND VOLUME DATA
PLANT AND CITY
(^fl ~Jo£. */ &U-a~*v\ 6--&e>0 ft^ •
RUN DATE
I/
/
'l?
/
'*&
ox
SAMPLING LOCATION
M> <~ 7&/1S*. 377*-^
CLOCK
TIME
\f- t-^ '' " 66 6V
RUN
NUMBER
V-7
OPERATOR
£4-^X4
AMB. TEMP.
(•P)
-S* ?.£-
3f\
3
"3'^f
3
-------
EMISSION TESTING FIELD DATA EPA METHOD I - DETERMINATION-OF «£=: FROM STATIONARY SOURCES
FIMT i CIIT
'I ih l« Nil»111 t|.il..|u|ii|..|.s|.i|..i|.i|.iN"l"l"l»l»l»«l»'l»hl'«l»l"L» »Nuli.|i.H.o|4.
-l_L
,1 fl4.11
OATC
SAMPLING LOCATION
4l[4l]44}4s[4>||si[S<[ss[s>jSI Sl[st|4fl{n[»
I I I ' ' I I 1 I I I I I I I I I
I ' 1 I I
LOttTN AMD tm
[ HtHR
IfiOI NO. 80110
|.|4|t|,|.|.|.|,.|..|u|u|4s|..|u|..|..
11.11
.till
»s[»|»|»i|»i
till
J-L
S
A 1
MIC* CAL.
ri^TOI T
41*.|4S U| 41
A I I I
i|si|si{st
J_L
k 1 1
M|.,|,.|.,|..li,
I I i I I I * I I I ,1
3H
HOH
HUT StT
"i^lMl"
M|H|IO|II
1 1
TJTyRH
i i »
It COM)
MIA NIK
1 1
yl«|9|io
I9|70|?<
2J 30|3IJ32|33|34l35J3«J3:
3t|39|40|4»
'310^41.
"hMM
^Z_
. ClOCK TIMt
•UMTUHCX. (24 hr
CM HCTU
STACK
IKMreitATUU
OUT CAS HCTM
TEMPERATURE
INLCT
IT. ».»r
in
INHMGCa
TBtfMAW
•r
tc^r*
.r.
2L
33
ro
i
JJUfo
39
J _L- 1
-------
PARTICULATE SAMPLE RECOVERY AND INTEGRITY SHEET
I
Plant VLfjekM — K^/~A,M^^O
Sample location Sfa.-' £o,('c.£- ^
Run number /fi_- /
Filter number(s) //f^
Impingers
* Final volume (wt) »9.'*^
**3-(t Initial volume (wt) >~0D
var* Net volume (wt) ?.f.?^
T7f, * '
Description of impinger water
Ji
^•^ Total moisture
T, Me, Sample date /~Jf- £
S r »
'j%^k Recovery date i/X/t
Recovered by &&
^~ —
MOISTURE
Silica gel
ml(g) Final wt bt^.^
ml(g) Initial wt tg&.Lh
ml(g) Net wt f.f
S^ % spent
J6.3 g
'/ j^
$f
g
g
g
Filter container number(s)
Description of particulate on filter
RECOVERED SAMPLE -
«.
Sealed
Probe rinse
container no.
^_ blank
container no.
Impinger contents
container no.
blank
container no.
Samples stored and locked
Remarks
Liquid level
marked
Liquid level
marked
Liquid level
marked
Liquid level
marked
Received by
Remarks
LABORATORY CUSTODY
Date
B-15
-------
EMISSION TESTING FIELD DATA EPA METHOD.-^- DETERMINATION- OF £&CFROM STATIONARY SOURCES
PLANT i CUT
i|i|i|«IMil'l'J»l«t|'M»l«'l'M'M'*j'i<''l'«M»'l"l»'l»l»N»>l"NM|>'l"l»
DATE
§
SAMPLING LOCATION
«)|«)[«|«s |4i|4i|«i|4»[>o[y[n|ii|M[st[n[ii|ti|ti[ie|n|i;|i)[u|n
SAMPLE TIM
M n hi n hi iit««i
i|.i!..i*.|.«|i.|u|MHM|,.|,,|,.|,,l
I I
III I I J_
I I I 1 I 1 1
I I I I I I I
II* «.
OPIUTC*
|l|l|lilllHll|l«|l*|li|t»l'»l'll»l"l"|n|H|ftN"
HMP
"H"1
MESS.
« » >
II 11 1)1)4
)s !)< In In »
'I"M"|M^
1 1 I
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I
1 I
A i L
ra?
MOM LEJUTM AM) UPf
|.|.|.|»|..|n|4.|
same IMEUB
.801 NOJtOllO
JoITt]
nln|i4|» ^[M
MITCI CAl.
.^:T« T
M[U|M|S
nou
NUT UT
HOMO
DATA NINS
•1
j-l«»!i{n{>i
* 1.1 I
i i i i
i.l 1
-L_L
1 1 1
ill,
I
k 1 1
1 1
lialuLliAl
7|«|9|IO
3»|39|40|41
52| 33 1 54
57
. CLOCK TIM
SAMTUHCS. 124 hr
TIMB,Bl» XXLOOtl
CM MXTU UAOU6
I*!, ft*
STACK
TCIVC1UTUU
OUT CAS MCTCI
TCMPCRATURC
INHNCUI
IT, i.»r
tn
.$-;
00
I
CT1
'77 3 .V7
30.
1 1
-------
PARTICULATE SAMPLE RECOVERY AND INTEGRITY SHEET
I-
Plant
Sample date
Sample location A/c . s Ktj'^ $Tfa£ Recovery date ///£&*
Run number /ff >• ^ Recovered by
Filter number(s) //A
_ MOISTURE
X*2^_£. Impingers Silica gel
•m"4pf:f Final volume (wt) 9tf J ml(g) Final wt 3
i_ ,>&A Initial volume (wt) 9-uo ml(g) Initial wt £ g
% spent
Filter container number(s)
Description of particulate on filter
Sealed
Probe rinse
container no.
blank
container no.
Impinger contents
container no.
blank
container no.
Samples stored and locked
Remarks
Liquid level
marked
Liquid level
marked
Liquid level
marked
Liquid level
marked
LABORATORY CUSTODY
Received by
Remarks
Date
B-17
-------
,
EMISSION TESTING FIELD DATA EPA METHOD « - DETERMINATION-OF '«*- FROM STATIONARY SOURCES
PlMT t CUT
|«|i|i|.|i|t|.,|..M»»l'«l'«H»l''t'iH"Ni^l»l'«M'iNi«|i"^R
MTE
R?
JR*
i i i
i is it ii n\n 40 4i
<'. I i/i/i/Vt/igBT i i \/l/0i&\\
IUH *>.
ortutM
e?
UM>
Cf)
OBD
FRCSS.
Il|»[ll|l4
^RliK
4o|4l|4i|4l|4j|4s|4>|4l|4«[4l|so|si|s>lSl[V»|SS[Sl{S)Sl|Sl|H(n[n
PAtf
iuuubo ji» :dJ4 isit »
Mjujn n
•I'T'I'^
i/tO|f J
i i i i i i
Mill 1 l l 1 l i l i 1 1 l
t i i
MOM LOtTH MO 1TK
.|.l»l«l.l»l'l.l«l'.TTn
m|n|i
SAN>1(
801 NO.
MTIR
BOIIO
iiJ40J4t!«
MtTU CAl.
r~.:io« t
m
nou
NUT UT
i|/o[n
KUHO
MTA NIM
I4JH >4[t>
1 1 1 \6\' 1
A I I I
1 M I
1
.1
AIM
1 1
i 1 1
l l
1 1 i* ,
&
»h*l»
19|20l2< 1 22J23J24
3«|39|40|.
42.43|44|45l4. ft1
STAC!
TCNTCIUTUU
PUT CAS HETCB
TCMPCKATUU
INLET
IT l.*r
in
INTtNCU
TDtfCMW
•r
./3
*>*.
VI
> r
l - 1
1. 1
1 - 1
-------
PARTICULATE SAMPLE RECOVERY AND INTEGRITY SHEET
Plant
3t h/J -
Sample date
v ,//--/'/
Sample location ^.£ fSt'/tf/L
Run number f/,~2
Filter number(s) /Iri
Impingers
Final volume (wt)
Initial volume (wt) 20O
Net volume (wt)
Description of impinger water
Total moisture
'STtkJL Recovery
Recovered by
P"
MOISTURE
Silica gel
ml(g) Final wt
ml(g) Initial wt
ml (g) Net wt
36.7
date ///-7/tfir""
f ft n
^fijL^frj
b9/,) g
^^ *f g
7.2- g
% spent
g
Filter container number(s)
Description of particulate on filter
RECOVERED SAMPLE
Sealed
Probe rinse
container no.
blank
container no.
Impinger contents
container no.
blank
container no.
Samples stored and locked
Remarks
Liquid level
marked
Liquid level
marked
Liquid level
marked
Liquid level
marked
Received by
Remarks
LABORATORY CUSTODY
Date
B-19
-------
DRY MOLECULAR WEIGHT DETERMINATION
PLANT
UATF 1/lWxV TFiTNO
SAMPL ING VlME |?4-hr CLOCKS /. ^ 2_ I
SAMPI ING LOCATION
SAMPLE TYPE (BAG, INTEGRATED.^eNTiNuSDS^
ANALYTICAL METHOD OQ^fi-r*
AMRIFNT TEMPERATURE
OPERATOR ])^
RAq
J
oj/'^R. 1.3
(j? O'/iTT rf
.ORSAT LEAK CHECKED ^/
COMMENTS:
1
r.
. r
'^TT-
^ ^
J.Sfo '' "
^^^ RUN
GAS ^\
C02
02 (NET IS ACTUAL 02
READING MINUS ACTUAL
C02 READING)
COfNET IS ACTUAL CO
READING MINUS ACTUAL
02 READING)
N2(NET IS 100 MINUS
ACTUAL CO READING)
1
ACTUAL
READING
\\.6
as
NET
lit
V
2
ACTUAL
READING
NET
3
ACTUAL
READING
NET
AVERAGE
NET
VOLUME
ll.f
70
ji/lflfl-.-W. 0-z - 7, L
r ^ ~ // v
oo^ - ////
MULTIPLIER
44 '100
32 '100
•«
28 '100
TOTAL
MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF
STACK GAS (DRY BASIS)
Md, Ib Ib-mole
ro
o
-------
DRY MOLECULAR WEIGHT DETERMINATION
PLANT
DATE ////.-
COMMENTS:
SAMPLING TIME (24-hr CLOCK1
SAMPLING LOCATION,
.TEST NO.
/g /(
SAMPLE TYPE (BAG. INTEGRATED£$p3EUNUO^
ANALYTICAL METHOD.
AMBIENT TEMPERATl
OPERATOR
V
7.0
.ORSAT LEAK CHECKED
^\^^ RUN
GAS ^^^
C02
O£(NET is ACTUAL oz
READING MINUS ACTUAL
C02 READING)
COfNET IS ACTUAL CO
READING MINUS ACTUAL
02 READING)
N 2 (NET IS 100 MINUS
ACTUAL CO READING)
1
ACTUAL
READING
//,3X
/>; f
NET
« .£
7>o
2
ACTUAL
READING
NET
3
ACTUAL
READING
NET
AVERAGE
NET
VOLUME
//<
%i>
/l/cvfb*- &j-~ L^
S.s^ - i 7 . U-
MULTIPLIER
44 100
32 '100
^/lOO
28 '100
MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF
STACK GAS (DRY BASIS)
Md, Ib Ib-mole
TOTAL
03
I
ro
-------
DRY MOLECULAR WEIGHT DETERMINATION
PLANT.
DATE.
/i.
COMMENTS:
SAMPLING TIME (24-h/CLOCK>
SAMPLING LOCATION
_TEST NO.
/
njJ '
SAMPLE TYPE (BAG, INTEGRATED,
ro
-------
DRY MOLECULAR WEIGHT DETERMINATION
PLANT.
DATE.
COMMENTS:
_TEST NO
SAMPLING TIME (24-hr CLOCK)
SAMPLING LOCATION
SAMPLE TYPE (BAG,
ANALYTICAL METHOD.
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE.
OPERATOR
//f.
.ORSAT LEAK CHECKED
\^ RUN
GAS ^\
C02
02(NET IS ACTUAL 02
READING MINUS ACTUAL
C02 READING)
COfNET IS ACTUAL CO
READING MINUS ACTUAL
02 READING)
N2(NET IS 100 MINUS
ACTUAL CO READING)
1
ACTUAL
READING
12. J-
M
NET
a*
fe.x
2
ACTUAL
READING
NET
3
ACTUAL
READING
NET
AVERAGE
NET
VOLUME
/2.1-
^
M.M-,4~ o, _ tf
MULTIPLIER
44 100
32 '100
4.
28 '100
TOTAL
MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF
STACK GAS (DRY BASIS)
Md. Ib Ib-mole
oo
i
ro
OJ
-------
DRY MOLECULAR WEIGHT DETERMINATION
PLANT
DATE 1 / !7/9< TFSTNO
SAMPLING TIME (24-hr CLOCK! 1 3 / .^T
SAMPLING 1 NATION MoA ' ~^0*-
SAMPLE TYPE (BAG, INTEGRATED, eQSBWJ&W
ANALYTICAL MFTHOD OP^A^""
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE
OPERATOR Dj- -
.ORSAT LEAK CHECKED v X
(0
fji^> I £~T
B/VV
\r
COMMENTS:
\. RUN
GAS ^^\
C02
02(NET IS ACTUAL 02
READING MINUS ACTUAL
C02 READING)
CO(NET IS ACTUAL CO
READING MINUS ACTUAL
02 READING)
N 2 (NET IS 100 MINUS
ACTUAL CO READING)
I
ACTUAL
READING
//i-
Ill
NET
/^
Y,u
2
ACTUAL
READING
NET
3
ACTUAL
READING
NET
AVERAGE
NET
VOLUME
//-
4
-------
SITE
ISOKINETIC
A/c.
CALCULATION
TEST NO.
1. Volume of dry gas sampled corrected to
standard conditions. Note: V must be
corrected for leakage 1f any leakage
rates, exceed L().
IP AH 1
bar + TJT
Til J
2. Volume of Miter vapor at standard con-
ditions, ft .
V - 0. 04707 V,,. •
"std ic
3. Moisture content 1n stack gas.
vw
B • std •
"" V * V
mstd "std
4. Dry molecular weight of stack gas,
Ib/lb-nole.
Md • 0.440 (X C02) * 0.320 (I 02)
«• 0.280 (1 H2 * I CO) «
5. Molecular weight of stack gas.
"s ' "d t1'^) * 18 Bws •
6. Stack velocity at stack conditions. ,
fps.
Vm fll tO Fn lava ^AP I / .... S •
> V '*/ B M
V p$ Ms
7. Isokinetlc variation
1 I • "std i * « 17.32
V°n «««%M1-BM)
V ft^
vm* Tt
Y
Pbar, In.Hg
AH, in.H20
f~ »D
'm' K
Vm , dscf
mstd
Vlc. 9
vw ,ft3
wstd
Bws
J-Bws
% C02 C^M*
%-ce^^^
% N2 + % CO
Md, Ib/lb-mole
Ms, Ib/lb-mole
Pstatic» 1n'H2°
Pc, In.Hg
s
V °R
M
Cp
V fPs
Dn, 1n.
0, min.
% I
RUN 1
/8,33f
S.e>3*
23.10
/.a.3
&«.•*-
/9.$7t
3(*3
tfrf
.**;
.IK
»,f
3.1
*IJ
3o.»H
*1.+1
+,t
1J9 *^L.
7*J.rlD
113
o/m
o.M
3Z,^
RUN 2
H.W4
/,033
tf.29
A2.3
f03>5
/5Mb
22. i.
i.oio
0.06
0,W
us
7.0
r/.s
3
-------
SITE
-*'f ~
ISOKINETIC CALCULATION
c-;. -T.QC-.' . Ml
TEST NO.
1. Volume of dry gas sampled corrected to
standard conditions. Note: V must be
corrected for leakage 1f any leakage
rates exceed L,).
IP AN 1
bar * T3T .
Tm \
2. Volume of water vapor at standard con-
ditions, ft .
V • 0.04707V1r •
"std 1C
3. Moisture content In stack gas.
vw
B • std •
V_ * V
"std "std
4. Dry molecular weight of stack gas,
Ib/lb-mole.
Md - 0.440 (t C02) * 0.320 (1 Oj)
* 0.280 (» N2 * 1 CO) «
5. Molecular weight of stack gas.
M$ - Md (1-BW$) * 18 Bw$ -
6. Stack velocity at stack conditions,
fps. . ......
Vm B*i 4Q To I»VQ VTp") / S •
* \ 'V D II
V P$ M$
7. Isoklnetlc variation
t I • "std « ' * 17.32
V, . On . • . P, . (!-»„)
V ft
vmf Tt
Y
Pbar, In.Hg
AH, 1n.H20
VOR
vm „• dscf
std
Vle. 9
vw ,ft3
wstd
Bws
l-^s
% C02
%-G02 O-^
% N2 + % CO
Md, Ib/lb-mole
Ms, Ib/lb-mole
Pstatic» 1n'H2°
Pe. In.Hg
s
T~ °R
V K
VAF
Cp
Vs. fps
Dn, 1n.
0, min.
% I
RUN 1
22.322
1.033
^Q.so
/, 23
foi
13,235
3b,&
1.732
0,06
-------
NOX EMISSION TESTING FIELD DATA
PLANT AND CITY
i29JJohl|32l33;
DATE
42|43[44|4> |4»|4l|4l|<
SAMPLING LOCATION
friuNMlii
SAMPLE TYPE
\MJ
I i i i
i i I i i j
RUN NO.
OPERATOR
AMB.
TEMP
CF)
INITIAL FLASK PRESSURE
LEG 1
IN. HG.
LEG 2
IN. HG.
FINAL FLASK PRESSURE
LEG 1
IN. HG.
LEG 2
IN. HG.
STACK INSIDE
DIMEN. (In.)
INIT.
BAR.PRES.
IN. HG.
FINAL
BAR. PRES.
IN. HG.
l"l"j'j
Il|3t|]]|34|]>|l6
17|]g|M
|40|4l|42|43
M|S9|tD|et|62|
III I I I I I I I I
0* 0,
10\> 1
6GL i i
1 1 i 1
I
r\3
—i
FLASK AND VALVE NOS.
| »| 114 mi| 11 i | >|io|n|u|n|i4[»|u|n|ii|n"
i i i iT\T\ i i i i i i i i i i i i
FLASK TEMP
INIT.'F
FINALS
FLASK
VOL. ML.
REAGENT
VOL. ML.
F - FACTOR
«|4S [48|4)|4l|49|so|il|»
02 PER.
FLOW RATE
DSCFM
MILLIGRAMS
N°2
CLOCK
TIME
IOl2l|22J23|24
2S]2«l2rJ2l|29
3o|3l|32|l3])4|)sl36
fifh \
I
l|l»l«I«J
42 43 44 4S
i3|»«[>i|M|S^>l|M|CO tTJ6j|i3|t4|li|il[t>|M|l9
1 1
IOl
1 1 1
H|2l|»|ll[>4|;T
-------
NOX EMISSION TESTING FIELD DATA
PLANT AND CITY
DATE
SAMPLING LOCATION
SAMPLE TYPE
_LI I "
i i i i i i ii
I I I
i i i i
i i I i i i
RUN NO.
OPERATOR
AMB.
TEMP
CF)
INITIAL FLASK PRESSURE
LEG 1
IN. HG.
LEG 2
IN. HG.
FINAL FLASK PRESSURE
LEG 1
IN. HG.
LEG 2
IN. HG.
STACK INSIDE
DIMEN. (in.)
INIT.
BAR.PRES.
IN. HG.
FINAL
BAR. PRES.
IN. HG.
rsj)i|7!l;i|nlio
. . M .
I I i I i I I I I I
llfl
i \lfiiOi
\o\< \Z\
1 1 1 | 1
ro
oo
FLASK AND VALVE NOS.
|ll|u|ll[l4[lsin|l>[ll|lT
FLASK TEMP
INIT.'F
FINAL *F
FLASK
VOL. ML.
REAGENT
VOL. ML.
1>[]|(1«|40|4||42[<
F - FACTOR
M"I«M*I"I'
02 PER.
u|S4|li|n|-
FLOW RATE
DSCFM
MILLIGRAMS
N02
CLOCK
TIME
41 U 4*
IMISUI
I I I I I Iff tl I I I I I I I I I I
_LJ_
AC,
I I I t-*** I
,3,9,2,3^,
-------
NOX EMISSION TESTING FIELD DATA
PLANT AND CITY
DATE
SAMPLING LOCATION
«2|4)[44|4i|4l|4)|4l|4l|M[si|>2[>l[M|Si[si|si|il|St[ta|ll|»[l3|M|lS
SAMPLE TYPE
l|l|l|l|»ll|l|«l«l'll"l'>|n|'|2)
I I i InJB I CJf I I
I I I I I I
A I/I
1 1 1 1
CO
I
ro
10
FLASK AND VALVE NOS.
.|i|»M.|.M.|.b.|..hN4»b.|..M.
FLASK TEMP
INIT.'F
FINALS
7»T^
_ " '—
FLASK
VOL. ML.
REAGENT
VOL. ML.
i[]i|»|4a|4JJ
F - FACTOR
[4||4)|4||4||S«|S||S2
i»^»n»Ai i Ji n I i^J—^—
02 PER.
FLOW RATE
DSCFM
MILLIGRAMS
N0
CLOCK
TIME
11124
nn»
4243
IMISil
n|ii|ri|ii|i«|n
1 I I I I l/l/fl i | I I i i I I I i
J_L
I I I
-------
NOX EMISSION TESTING FIELD DATA
PLANT AND CITY
^[lt[l>u|nl20|»ll2?[;i|M|2i|2tl2)|2l|2»|ia|il|i2|il
DATE
SAMPLING LOCATION
l|4l|4l|4j|u|St|
SAMPLE TYPE
i II 111)1 <
i I 1
I I I I I I I 1.
&Md$
1 I i
111111 i
RUN NO.
OPERATOR
AMB.
TEMP
CF)
INITIAL FLASK PRESSURE
LEG 1
IN. HG.
LEG 2
IN. HG.
FINAL FLASK PRESSURE
LEG 1
IN. HG.
LEG 2
IN. HG.
STACK INSIDE
DIMEN. (In.)
INIT.
BAR.PRES.
IN. HG.
FINAL
BAR. PRES
IN. HG.
TOM rti«
i'i«H"i"
i;|MJN|4l)|«l|42
DO
I
co
o
1 1 1 1
1 1 1
FLASK AND VALVE NOS.
|t|i|i|.i|nhi|tiNiiRnR
FLASK TEMP
INIT.'F
FINAL'F
»l;«l»l"l»
FLASK
VOL. ML.
ml] i In
REAGENT
VOL. ML.
3l[ll[ll[4g|4l|4j[4]
F - FACTOR
02 PER.
FLOU RATE
DSCFM
"I"!"!**!"!'
MILLIGRAMS
N0
CLOCK
TIME
IK II
I4JS4I
».|n|>i|ii|74|»
I I I I I I I I I I
J_L
, ,
1 1
, i
0| .
-------
NOX EMISSION TESTING FIELD DATA
PLANT AND CITY
DATE
SAMPLING LOCATION
4S |4l|4)|4l]41 M)|il|»|s3li<[»|>l|»JM[M,|80|n[i2[«.3[l
SAMPLE TYPE
l|»|)l|?l|»t|ll|lO
|iil|l|l|»|n|ll|u|ll|l4|n|u|ll|"l'«ti°l"l"l"i;4l''ll»l"l"l"l]°l"l1'l1'
.' m m J ' i.'. 'if t . • i* . i . • • •—'.'j'11
1
]4|)s|3i|3)[]li3l|40|4l
I i—J—•^^^•^-J^—
^LjiJ
M&Qi, iffia i i i i i i i i i i
M
J_L
1 1 i I
I I I I I
RUN NO.
OPERATOR
AMB.
TEMP
CF)
INITIAL FLASK PRESSURE
LEG 1
IN. HG.
LEG 2
IN. HG.
FINAL FLASK PRESSURE
LEG 1
IN. HG.
LEG 2
IN. HG.
STACK INSIDE
DIMEN. (in.)
INIT.
BAR.PRES.
IN. HG.
FINAL
BAR. PRES
IN. HG.
O3
I
CO
^hT"
|l [ I|ll[ll{l2j73[l4|l>]llll »|ll|ll |?o|2l[22|23[24iii|2i[2;
l i
ii i l i l i i i
JO ft
l/l»|»|
1 1 ll»|»|
i/ 1/ in
1 1 i 1
FLASK AND VALVE NOS.
nwm,
111 id >
l|l|ll|ll[ll[u|l4|li|n|ll[u|n
FLASK TEMP
INIT.'F
!o|2l]22|23|24
FINAL'F
FLASK
VOL. ML.
io|ii|i;|)i|]4]»Ti'
REAGENT
VOL. ML.
F - FACTOR
4J4S [4t|4)[4l|4»|M|il[i
02 PER.
FLOW RATE
DSCFM
MILLIGRAMS
N0
CLOCK
TIME
ttlitln
l|3l|40|4l|42|
41 42 43 44 44
U tl112 U M IS
Ju|»|lJTt7
- - - -
.2.?.?iO. .
mnliiliilitln,
I I I I I I M 1 I I I
_LJL
l I I7|.
l I I OtU\ I
ififitt
-------
NOX EMISSION TESTING FIELD DATA
PLANT AND CITY
'IMMM»i«J'lM*l''[1M"l;iH'M'»l''l'|l?M"l»i»N"i"Nll|h'l"l"
DATE
SAMPLING LOCATION
42[4i[44
l|»2|u[t4|lS
SAMPLE TYPE
«M»i|«|)o|;il72|?j|Mi;s|)i|H|)i|;i|ia
^•^U-^^^^^L~l~^».i-JHMl^^-J—^^^^t^
iTITi
I
J4ln|36l
frg.fryJMiIi .iiiiii
\\s\i\vsx
M^iST .go.//.
iq*l I
i i i
1 1 I I
IIIIII
RUN NO.
OPERATOR
AMB.
TEMP
CF)
2l|2i|iO
INITIAL FLASK PRESSURE
LEG 1
IN. HG.
LEG 2
IN. HG.
ll|3l|n|4Q|4l|42|4)
i
FINAL FLASK PRESSURE
LEG 1
IN. HG.
m*
LEG 2
IN. HG.
STACK INSIDE
DIMEN. (In.)
INIT.
BAR.PRES.
IN. HG.
FINAL
BAR. PRES
IN. HG.
THTT;
|4IJ4)|4l|4l|sa
^~1~T"T™r"~r
Mill M|;I|J»|
CO
1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1
1 /!•
1 1 i 1
FLASK AND VALVE NOS.
,i,iii.i.i.i,i.i.i..i..ranra»isir
FLASK TEMP
INIT.'F
I8|2l|22[2i|24'
FINAL »F
2s|2t|2>J2l[2»
FLASK
VOL. ML.
iiiliilMlishi
REAGENT
VOL. ML.
»|]lin|4o|4IJ42J4]
F - FACTOR
44J4S |4||4)|4||4I|M[S
^•^^^••^•i^-lij. I-
02 PER.
Sl|44|»|M|il|»[»[ie «I
FLOM RATE
DSCFM
MILLIGRAMS
N°2
CLOCK
TIME
IM»(
'o|n|n[n|>4j»
i I I I O\Q i i i I i i i i I I i
2£
1 1 \
1
1tu i
i i i
1 1
-------
NOX EMISSION TESTING FIELD DATA
PLANT AND CITY
DATE
SAMPLING LOCATION
42[4JJ44 4T[>4|«>|<4|;|si|v»|»|il|'
SAMPLE TYPE
l|l.|MH»l"l"l»l"l"N"l"|>t|l
i i i i/yd* i i i i i i i
|,|.N.|.j,j.|.UnM4«l4.l4.hN.-k
>«
-* * _*- i *- * ...'*-•''**• . . - » ^
,(J.PJiQ./^| ,^/9iL^/>(^Q^ tti
I i i
i i i
RUN NO.
OPERATOR
AMB.
TEMP
CF)
INITIAL FLASK PRESSURE
LEG 1
IN. HG.
LEG 2
IN. HG.
FINAL FLASK PRESSURE
LEG 1
IN. HG.
LEG 2
IN. HG.
STACK INSIDE
DIMEN. (in.)
INIT.
BAR.PRES.
IN. HG.
FINAL
BAR. PRES
IN. HG.
ikifl i6/^
2t|2<[lO
»|)t|M|4ll|4l|42|4)
i |4i|4l|4l|4i|M
DO
I
oo
oo
1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1
l i/f
i/i2t6i
1 Hvl' if 1
l
1 i 1 1
FLASK AND VALVE NOS.
l|n|tl|»|ll|l4|n|l>|n|llp7
FLASK TEMP
INIT.»F FINAL'F
FLASK
VOL. ML.
REAGENT
VOL. ML.
F - FACTOR
02 PER.
FLOW RATE
DSCFM
MILLIGRAMS
N0
CLOCK
TIME
'1
1 1 1
l i i I l i l l I I l
1 1
1 1
i i
i i
-------
NOX EMISSION TESTING FIELD DATA
PLANT AND CITY
li|ll|ll|l2ill|u|l>iu|l2|ll|li|20|tli22|ni24|;4|26|;i|2l[:i|lo|ll|»|lT
,^_ __ ' l L l *- *- -J»A_^-JU^^^^.^i• I ^J -J— .* * * * 1*1
DATE
34|34[n|l2[3ljnj4Q|4l
SAMPLING LOCATION
42|[i2 4ll5<|tOJH|6;|t3|M|t4
SAMPLE TYPE
il[(2lilIl«|20|2l[7l|2lf24|2S|2l|22|7l|7l[lO
—J—^«—i^t*^»*»4j—^—i—*^^fc^^-A-«^—i—
i i l
li
//•/.A/IBIS
i i i i i i i inw i i i i i i i
CO
I
OJ
RUN NO.
'MlilMili
OPERATOR
Niihi[iih«»|ii|"i"l'«
AHB.
TEMP
2i|n[)o
INITIAL FLASK PRESSURE
LEG 1
IN. HG.
LEG 2
IN. HG.
'N"H"1"I"
FINAL FLASK PRESSURE
LEG 1
IN. HG.
|4||4)[4I
3T
LEG 2
IN. HG.
STACK INSIDE
DIMEN. (in.)
n|i;|tj M|IS|H|H|M|H
INIT.
BAR.PRES.
IN. HG.
FINAL
BAR. PRES
IN HG.
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
-1_J_
/IM/I
1 IIMI 1
' l * l ' I '
FLASK AND VALVE NOS.
FLASK TEMP
INIT.'F
FINAL'F
24|2l!j;|2IJ75
i I in V *
FLASK
VOL. ML.
'N"N:
REAGENT
VOL. ML.
1I|]||]«|40|4||42|43
• [•••^••^i^^—^-^
F - FACTOR
O|il|42
0 PER.
4][>4|4i|4l|i2|4a|4»|60 H[t;|tj|M|l4
FLOW RATE
DSCFM
MILLIGRAMS
N0
CLOCK
TIME
jM
l|22|23l24
2l|22|2l|2
-------
NOX EMISSION TESTING FIELD DATA
PLANT AND CITY
DATE
SAMPLING LOCATION
SAMPLE TYPE
. , , , i i i , , i
I I I I I
RUN NO.
OPERATOR
AMB.
TEMP
CF)
INITIAL FLASK PRESSURE
LEG 1
IN. HG.
LEG 2
IN. HG.
l)|ll|jl|40|4|Si|Sl|il|si|»|M tl|t2|n|M[l>)u|t?|M|H'
MILLIGRAMS
N0
CLOCK
TIME
•Uli
I 14 I5IH Ulllll
2021 22 2124
32L
IS It
l|40|4l|42|4)
>I>!2II*M
I I I I I
I I I I I I
J_L
2.0)
I I Qt^l I
-------
NOX EMISSION TESTING FIELD DATA
PLANT AND CITY
DATE
J4|ls[3SJ3>[:iiJ3|4C|4l
SAMPLING LOCATION
4;[43|44 44 [4t[4)[4l|4i|M|il|s;J43J44[4S|4lis>)s»|Sl|Kl)lll6j|l
SAMPLE TYPE
iH;|u|H|,o|,l|i2|»|;.|,s|1i|n|>.|,,i.
' ' Mtf* II
>IMMt|'|MM'il''l''lnhl»N'H'«l';Ni'U^»l»ij^l'M"NK|3.|i?iir
i l l l
i fti
I i I I I I l
I l l
RUN NO.
OPERATOR
AMB.
TEMP
CF)
INITIAL FLASK PRESSURE
LEG 1
IN. HG.
LEG 2
IN. HG.
FINAL FLASK PRESSURE
LEG 1
IN. HG.
LEG 2
IN. HG.
STACK INSIDE
OIMEN. (in.)
INIT.
BAR.PRES.
IN. HG.
FINAL
BAR. PRES.
IN. HG.
co
1 1 1 1 1 1 1
\0\* i/
1 i
i \
0\t i
I 1 1
FLASK AND VALVE NOS.
FLASK TEMP
INIT.'F
FINAL'F
FLASK
VOL. ML.
)0|}l|l2J13[34|js|li
1 'i _fr -• j —
REAGENT
VOL. ML.
F - FACTOR
42[4J u|4i |4»J4l|4l|4i|4fl|si|4? 4j|>4JSS|si[>l|s»|S»j»
02 PER.
FLOW RATE
DSCFM
MILLIGRAMS
N0
1
CLOCK
TIME
I"'*'
JH^—^M^M^B^lW
.^3.8.^.51
)i|n|;i|)tlio
™^^"—^™"^b?^^"~
i i i i i i i
ll l?i 1
1 1
I l iTlfciffi'fr l
l I I lA
-------
NOX EMISSION TESTING FIELD DATA
PLANT AND CITY
DATE
jiiH'|ii|ii|iijn|4Q|4i
SAMPLING LOCATION
33E
SAMPLE TYPE
Mli)|ii|6»notnl>2|n|;<|;s|;i|i)|?i|n|io
I»ll|4|iii|i|i|>l'«l"l'l|'i|i4|i>|un>|ii::iit3l3i|;2i.-i|:4i2s|;i|2>|2ijnil3|ii!i:jii
-*- *- *~ * l l * l * 1. _. •_ 1. 1 1 1. ^ -1. . 1 L- _1 L 1 k- 1 . 1, t t J. . A.. —.-
42 41 44 4S |«l|4> <
t//l/lfc/gtf<
, . 1
JJiPJiOiftA^
I IM<
I I I I I I I I
i i
I I I I I I I
I I I I I I
RUN NO.
OPERATOR
AMB.
TEMP
CF)
INITIAL FLASK PRESSURE
LEG 1
IN. HG.
LEG 2
IN. HG.
FINAL FLASK PRESSURE
LEG 1
IN. HG.
LEG 2
IN. HG.
STACK INSIDE
DIMEN. (in.)
INIT.
BAR.PRES.
IN. HG.
FINAL
BAR. PRES
IN. HG.
•I'N'N'
|i|iiiilti|ii|ii|u|iilii|n|ii|iiN»'l«»MMI»l»H'
uTHj
38
2IJ21J18
44|4> [4i[4l|4l)4ilSa
i i i/ya i un i i i i i i i i i i i
/A
i i
0\
1 1 i 1 1
CO
I
CA>
FLASK AND VALVE NOS.
FLASK TEMP
INIT.'F
!0|2l|2t|2
FINAL'F
FLASK
VOL. ML.
10111 112111 14 IS II
REAGENT
VOL. ML.
M|iiHni«|4i
J2iji i
F - FACTOR
4S |4i|4l|4IJ4«|SO|
I l^lfcl^
0 PER.
FLOW RATE
DSCFM
'I"!"!*4!"!"
MILLIGRAMS
N0
CLOCK
TIME
i i i7i/f/3i i i i i i i i i i i
i^tfl* i
I I I Lltf/l I
M
i/i7k^7
-------
NOX EMISSION TESTING FIELD DATA
RUN NO.
OPERATOR
Iitlii|i2lii|i4|nlii[ii|iiiiiboli
AMB.
TEMP
Clf)
INITIAL FLASK PRESSURE
LEG 1
IN. HG.
LEG 2
IN. HG.
FINAL FLASK PRESSURE
LEG 1
IN. HG.
|4i|4>J4li4ijia
LEG 2
IN. HG.
STACK INSIDE
DIMEN. (in.)
i>i|iOJtl|«l»JMIIi|t«|u|ll)i1
INIT.
BAR.PRES.
IN. HG.
FINAL
BAR. PRES
IN. HG.
^TTT
1 1
j&S
111111 11
i fii.ffi i
i i i
CO
CO
FLASK AND VALVE NOS.
I t I i i i i i r i i ; i i '
1111 ' I • ' U "P 2 U u MS II I) Ml
l>fA ' I I I 11
I 1 I lift I I I I I I I I I
FLASK TEMP
INIT.'F
FINAL'F
FLASK
VOL. ML.
REAGENT
VOL. ML.
F - FACTOR
02 PER.
;lsi|»iic
FLOW RATE
OSCFM
MILLIGRAMS
N0
CLOCK
TIME
Hi
444S 4I4,
^
1&
i i
i i
fllll]
-------
NO.. SAMPLE RECOVERY AND INTEGRITY SHEET
PLANT
DATE
I
SAMPLE RECOVERY PERSONNEL K ftflTT _ BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, (P) 2?.6Q in.Hg
PERSON WITH DIRECT RESPONSIBILITY FOR RECOVERED SAMPLES K
baf
Sample
No.
3/)
3?
-><-
3D
Final pressure
in.Hg
Leg Af
2,1
0,1
0
\.~L
Leq Bf
-\3
'0,2
0
M
pf
$.&
$?
fid
X$°
Final temperature
°F (tf)
^
4*
G4
^
°R (Tf)
?Z4
524
524
5" 2-4
Sampl e
recovery
time,
24-hour
- - -
PH
adjusted
9 to 12
Liquid
level
marked
Samples
stored
in locked
container
Pt = Pbar
Tf = tf + 460°F
LAB PERSON WITH DIRECT RESPONSIBILITY FOR RECOVERED SAMPLES
DATE RECOVERED SAMPLES RECEIVED iU\[ Cf ANALYST
ALL SAMPLES IDENTIFIABLE
REMARKS
ALL LIQUIDS AT MARKED LEVEL
SIGNATURE OF LAB SAMPLE TRUSTEE
B-39
-------
PLANT U?7Qtf|0
N0¥ SAMPLE RECOVERY AND INTEGRITY SHEET
A
DATE
SAMPLE RECOVERY PERSONNEL -fd
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, (P) 29- 6O in.Hg
PERSON WITH DIRECT RESPONSIBILITY FOR RECOVERED SAMPLES ? B/?7T
bflr
Sample
No.
U
IX
1C
^D
Final pressure
in.Hg
LeqAf
\-<0
14
(U
|,3
Leq Bf
'\4
' .2
"0,4
M
pf
2fc>°
flo°
^.bO
^^^
Final temperature
°F (tf)
6f .
Tf = tf + 460°F
LAB PERSON WITH DIRECT RESPONSIBILITY FOR RECOVERED SAMPLES
DATE RECOVERED SAMPLES RECEIVED __^&\h< ANALYST
ALL SAMPLES IDENTIFIABLE '
REMARKS
ALL LIQUIDS AT MARKED LEVEL
SIGNATURE OF LAB SAMPLE TRUSTEE
B-40
-------
N0¥ SAMPLE RECOVERY AND INTEGRITY SHEET
A
PLANT
DATE
(/
SAMPLE RECOVERY PERSONNEL
5/9 TT
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, (P. J "2 9'66 in.Hg
bar'
PERSON WITH DIRECT RESPONSIBILITY FOR RECOVERED SAMPLES
Sample
No.
\ft
\E>
\c
ID
Final pressure
in.Hg
Leq Af
0
0,2,
0,3
1.2
Leq Bf
' 0
' 0
O.I
i.o
pf
$.*>&
t1.«>
$.1°
*3
Final temperature
°F (tf)
t>4
^4
^4
6^
°R (Tf)
514
^z4
5-Zf
52-4
Sample
recovery
time,
24-hour
PH
adjusted
9 to 12
. _
Liquid
level
marked
_
Samples
stored
in locked
container
Pt - Pbar -
-------
CEM Data
10-minute Data Reduction
B-42
-------
Stack Outlet
NOX, 02, CO, and C02 10-minute Data Reduction
B-43
-------
NO.. CEM DATA SHEET
» '" - • ', •• ..'. - • • .
Date
/
PN
Ambient Temperature
Operator
Location
Time
Zero set
Chart reading
No
cone., ppm
N0x
conc.v ppm
N02
cone. , ppm
13
34
iiiL
33
3-20
SOL,
L
Figure 3-12. N0y CEK data sheet.
B-44
-------
02 PEM DATA SHEET
Date
PN
,J27
Ambient Temperature
CRF
Operator
~TSC<.-(. its
Location
P^
Time
f&5tf
//6%
((1%
/}i-3
/;jy
/s/y
if&
yzo?
l\(¥
m?
JZ3?
/MX
Zero set
Chart reading
'I/
Z5
2 /
A&
23-
li~
3&7$ 23>,£~
3t*l%
ZA.tT
sY
XL.*"
jy
A**. -
Q
L Li, lo
U )i}^
•
02
cone., %
3.5k ,/
y,2- ^
3.?
i-*
3.V
3.V
3-^
y. /
3.6
33
3:b
3.°l
- 1.%
i.z
A.$
„
V
Figure 3-14. 02 CEM Data Sheet.
B-45
-------
^-,
CO CEM DATA SHEET
Date
PN
Ambient Temperature
CRF
Operator
Location
Time
Zero set
Chart reading
CO
cone., ppm
/JOB
hti
73
73
17
3/
/25$
Figure 3-15. CO CEM data sheet.
B-46
-------
NO CEM DATA SHEET
PN
/3
p 2.?, ?/ Operator £>S /-P<%-
bar —
Ambient Temperature
CRF fiJOjrf^ "'
Location ^W^t:
•fto-4.HlMfi.IOte (j^C^Ul'- '' l.oooo
v ! \j
Time
/yy^
ll"-/L
/1-jZ-
.1 JTuJs^^
to
/£?/£
/&2(s
/SV^-
/5 ^p? "* "
^^*4* A
Zero set
>fr?
yrw
yrf7
Chart reading
y-o
Jl
±1: 5
H
-------
02 CEM DATA SHEET
Date
bar
PN
7, 3 /
Ambient Temperature
CRF £7 %>-
Operator
Location
Time
Zero set
Chart reading
02
cone., %
J"/
/(e/t,
l/.l
5-
Iff.
_ffTyur;
0?
T3 3-4-
(,.7
35
&
X,'
o . v
Figure 3-14. 02 CEM Data Sheet.
B-48
-------
CO CEM DATA SHEET
Figure 3-15. CO CEM data sheet.
B-49
faff
Date ll/S/%5 PN 3b'£ ' &
t[ JLf.Sl ^ //^ Ooerator DS f PA
rb«r £-J
Ambient Temperature
t*t*r /) fl 'ii^i*
CRF cxx* f^*+~
Location -or?tx^_
~, (^ "(sJ^j/o, Ifiktt (je-^QzKj,^ 0.^^ tft
ft v
Time
/y
-------
C02 CEM DATA SHEET
Date
PN
- X3
Ambient Temperature
CRF fOS/c -
Operator
Location
Time
Zero set
Chart reading
CQ2
cone.,
•&•
7!
i/
15
/A 7
Figure 3-13. CO? CEM Data Sheet.
'B-50
-------
, • / -/ k % / ta<^
"T^T U Q $4K NOX CEM DATA SHEET
/ O
p*t* ' / / <•" /# ^ PN 36 / .<~ - ^
pbar —
Ambient
CRF
z. CV , 3> 1 ' Operator XO //^
, Temperature
/.'
Location \^L/<
' -/Vfa/W ^t. Wr ^.'^ff
. — T / /
Time
•1-7 i^' '
11 31
/7£3
/fltiS'
IS\3
1 X2-?
/
2%k
2%o
2-8°
21%
.27*
ZlJ
MO
Z$O w~
(//
a?97
JLV
N0x
cone . , ppm
-
N02
cone. , ppm
. ••> '
Figure 3-12. N(L CEM data sheet.
B-51
-------
02 CEH DATA SHEET
Date
rbar
PN
Ambient Temperature
CRF
Operator
Location
/->
b
v^
7f;£ /We/
~^ 0^
<^' S"^/^
Time
Zero set
Chart reading
02
cone., %
.37.0
if, 7
3f,7
Figure 3-14. 02 CEM Data Sheet.
B-52
-------
CO CEM DATA SHEET
Date
PN 3^
Ambient Temperature
CRF _ f
Operator ,/)5/
Location
Time
Zero set
Chart reading
CO
cone., ppm
. //
6
/l.o
/l.o
t/,o
i/, 6
177
a
tv t.jf
Figure 3-15. CO CEM data sheet.
B-53
-------
C02 CEM DATA SHEET
Date
rbar
Ambient Temperature
CRF
Operator
Location
'-?
CAJLJ
Time
Zero set
Chart reading
CQz
cone.,
7753
(A
//. 9
Figure 3-13. C02 CEM Data Sheet.
B-54
-------
}L
NOX CEM DATA SHEET
Date __
pbar—
Ambient Temperature
CRF
PN
Operator
Location
Time
Zero set
Chart reading
No
cone. , ppm
NOX
cone., ppm
N02
cone. , ppm
•5S3
/03?
2SJ
33
3+
Figure 3-12. NO CEM data sheet.
B-55
-------
o
L
res
Date
02 CEM DATA SHEET
PN
Ambient Temperature
CRF *V%g fcD'~|Q.Zc5/flr3
Operator
J)S/ P R
Location Q lATnf^F '5-f*-* t
Time
Zero set
Chart reading
02
cone., %
3-7
til?
3-7
17
23
Zt.
*•
Figure 3-14. 02 CEM Data Sheet.
B-56
-------
CO CEM DATA SHEET
Date
PN
Anblent Temperature
CRF
Operator £>$/
Location
Time
f.
/3S1
Zero set
Chart reading
//.o
/5T/0
z
A
CO
cone., ppm
Figure 3-15. CO CEM data sheet,
/OL>J
B-57
-------
Date
rbar
C02 CEM DATA SHEET
PN
Ambient Temperature
CRF
Operator
Location
Time
/zn
/321
X3-/7
Zero set
Chart reading
, 73,0
73.0
7.2
74.0
73.°
COz
cone.,
/£•
X5.3
/S.o
Figure 3-13. C02 CEM Data Sheet.
B-58
/3-e?.?- -to /"S&y
-------
/3 7^% /OOL,-^^ Operator £>5 /W
rbar *~~~
Ambient Temperature
CRF WOK yx*u~ =
Location ^STfrCfc
- UD-*s>iri/ff,/e7r • -6~ 6~f * ~.4*99*r
Time
75 M
/53'
/&M/
yyb'/ • •
)laV (
/jfc //_
~26s^>
Zero set
/ (P>/.
&
-
Chart reading
JV, C
1£
3$
3£ \ U
^ V . 7
j? V,^
&f
/f^s- -
4/
/,: /t
^ • ^«/.
No
cone., ppm
27?
J2f3
^^3
O ^ O
^if ff ff
^j Oyi
o o y
28*-
ff*> / ^^
^T3
NO
cone., ppm
N02
cone. , ppm
...
Figure 3-12. NO.. CEM data sheet.
B-59
-------
Date
02 CEM DATA SHEET
PN
ph,r
Ambient
CRF
Time
JSA 1
I'SSl
ISH\
/<3V
/k* l
A il -
-f^l
-
23,01'
t Temperature
0*%» Cc
Zero set
/to*-'
•
o--7,«rz«*)/J.f*
Chart reading
••iff
^37
3%. J
o' V j
-^/y J CX
-P ^ ^r^
,f^
X^s, -
A' • <*/) V
. 7 ** 1 0
& 3 y, /
.
Operator
Location
^ Cos- Cc
02
cone., % .
t.f
7^
/^^
2Q
t Q
2,0
7.7
V,o
#,?
t,T
,05 /^
STfr&t
*{*o.
-------
CO CEM DATA SHEET
Date
PN
* ol
rpar
Anblent Temperature
Operator
Location
- o-
/3ft
'
A/
Time
Zero set
Chart reading
CO
cone., ppm
/(*(!
Figure 3-15. CO CEM data sheet.
B-61
-------
C02 CEM DATA SHEET
Date
rbar
PN
.2?. o 7
Ambient Temperature
CRF
Operator
Location
Time
Zero set
Chart reading
C02
cone.,
/537
IP/
6,0
Figure 3-13. C02 CEM Data Sheet.
B-62
-------
NOX CEM DATA SHEET
/
^
Date
pbar
Ambient Temperature
CRF AJOf rw*~ -- fc&-
PN
Operator ft % /P3-
Location
Time
•J7o/
I7J?
17^
173^
/7^
/7r/f-
Zero set
I.M
Chart reading
-•$*> -•-
3A^
i^ o i v
/x J?"
3/.T-
2%>£
>4^o =
t/
/M' ' 3V
^ 1^.^
No
cone., ppm
- 357
2$^
2^
ISO
2V7
^^^
^
M3
^o^
NOX
cone. , ppm
N02
cone. , ppm
A
Figure 3-12. NOX CEM data sheet.
B-63
-------
02 CEM DATA SHEET
Date
Pbar
Ambient Temperature
CRF i
PN
Operator
Location
Time
Zero set
Chart reading
02
cone.,
7V
3-1
Figure 3-14. 0? CEM Data Sheet.
B-64
-------
CO CEM DATA SHEET
7
Date ///*/y.S PN .5&/S ' /3 .
P. «2?,5 ^
bar
Ambient Temperature
CRF COfi^ ~- (.
Location ^Asuc/c
r^-^.r//)A./'/^ ^^ Soef**mf
ft —
Time
~'/7&9
/?/$
m?
/7'3t
/?*&
/?£*
Zero set
Chart reading
//
/2
J2<<*'
//, <
/AS"
^^
/fu^ •
/^' V5
A; ya>
co
cone., ppm
^/
tf
3f
!(,
26>
fr
' 36
/^y
/?
**
Figure 3-15. CO CEM data sheet.
B-65
-------
C02 CEM DATA SHEET
Figure 3-13. C02 CEM Data Sheet.
B-66
/<5>./ ^
/ / f 0
/y.7
/ *c~ ^l~
/5-,o
15 A
W3
01^ ' — / -2
V$ P&
S-fV^A
/ 000 '
•
-. •
-
-------
Ztrr"
NOX CEM DATA SHEET
PN
P «2X $"<""" Operator D5 /*/£
Ambient Temperature
CRF ^0^.
Location ^/V c /^L
- (c£>~~T
/a*7
/cv7
y i>27-
Zero set
/63^
Chart reading
3 //A
3*-
2J~>3
3)—
3/, fZ
?/ ',7
J>1—-
3 >—
^< ^
/u' . ^>.1
£-1? i? p ^x
No
cone., ppm
2*/5-'
T 5^O
2S~A
2&)
2
-------
7
Q2 CEM DATA SHEET
PN
Aroblem
CRF
Time
"7/7"
Ji-7
* ^
Zero set
.. . .
1032
^»-
i
i
•o- i,.,^/4^
Chart reading
J3
3*J
11
Ji
^c9-
^#V
^^s ^^
f^ _ "^^ ^^
fi-tj^ "-^
/,• If
^ ^f.^
.
Operator
Location
^6 ^-^
02
cone., % .
£,2-
^-4
^,2-
£.f
^,0
^•5^
^.7
L3
//.4
7.)
5,3
/^S / Pr^
Ortt c /-^
£*€*~*Mi
^
*•
Figure 3-14. 02 CEM Data Sheet.
B-68
-------
CO CEM pATA SHEET
Date Jin I?*) PN J^/S'-/^
p <2#", SS" Operator &6 fi&
'bar
Ambient Temperature
CRF d0ff~~
• Location "&?&&&-
- (ct>-6,S2-) / O-ifftf Co* £o
3-^
0 4
^7 ^J
/
3^
££-"
i^
y#
**
.
Figure 3-15. CO CEM data sheet.
B-69
-------
C02 CEM pATA SHEET
Date
pbar
Ambient Temperature
CRF
PN
/3
Operator
Location
Time
IOSCJ
Zero set
Chart reading
70
T/
CQz
cone.,
/3-r
73 .
Figure 3-13. CO? CEM Data Sheet.
B-70
-------
NO CEM DATA SHEET
" >•. ~. '
nat* i//7/fo PN -^/^-/^
P t-^> 5^ Operator DS / /^
bar •
Ambient Temperature
CRF 106 f~~^
_____ — . . . . ^
Location JT/31-^
^-,K
3^
3 C,
^5 *
•L1 J7,u
U? . 3 o
No
cone;, ppm
^\
29 C,
2-c}<
WJ>
22t>
2$&
m
Z11
271
N0x
cone. , ppm
N02
cone. , ppm
*
Figure 3-12. NOY CEM data sheet.
B-71
-------
K
02 CEM DATA SHEET
'. . fr ; " .1' '', ""
Date ///7/^T PN /*O ~/J>
P. z£\.:f3 Operator J) £//''/£.
Ambient Temperature
CRF O-L °/t>r- tci
L .
• Location ^7^?^-^
- ^. f16-^yV.3^^ <^>^ Coef~-&.ct<}(ic{-
Time
///fl
//£0
//^V
s/'1/0
//$&•
/^2.& ,rr
Zero set
- /j~/&
Chart reading
J&tf
3\e>
^,c5"
34, 2.
3&..^
3 7*&
fau* ^
"
U ft
U JZ.3
.
02
cone., % a
1^.?
^>.?
7,0
^
"7^0
73
7.0
7.1
VD
^
N
•
Figure 3-14. 02 CEM Data Sheet.
B-72
-------
CO CEM DAJA SHEET
Date ///7/ru^J^~^
fcb - C.S^) /& IWf' Cos {oe-f ~ &• 9 ?^.f
Time
///<2
/;.z0
;/3je>
//'^^
//ro
/^co
Zero set
Chart reading
/O
}£>,^
//
II
/0,<
/0.1
/U/gr *
A,' I'.v
^ ^'?
CO
cone . , ppm
/9
Zl
*2-^r
**L.ir'
2[
7&
y->
$$
/X
.
"
Figure 3-15. CO CEM data sheet.
B-73
-------
CO, CEM DATA SHEET
/
Date
bar
Anblent Temperature
CRF
PN
Operator
Location
% ^ /ID - -7.
Time
Zero set
Chart reading
COg
cone.,
. -tor
111®
Figure 3-13. C02 CEH Data Sheet.
B-74
-------
-NOX CEM DATA SHEET
PN
P £/< 5" 5^ Operator /)£//''£•
rbar —
Ambient Temperature
CRF tJO++~ -- 6-
Location ^7>^oA
't>-t&/o,not &,,&>** *<,.<*<*<)
/7 • ^ '•••
Time
fetiH
y^yv
;'Ji>^
3) H
)^V
'37-V
Zero set
n */i/
Chart reading
5^,5"
315, •f
32-
^ ,^
33
31* f>
Av* ^
& ?*/,%
U } 0
No
cone., ppm
;2^3
^6z
^57)
^5"V
;*s~?
^^
^T6
^75"
^^ }
N0x
cone . , ppm
N02
cone. , ppm
»
Figure 3-12. N0y CEM data sheet.
B-75
-------
Q2 CEM DATA SHEET
Date
rbar
Ambient Temperature
CRF
Operator
Location
3/
-J
Time
Zero set
Chart reading
02
cone., %
Mo
/3'vy
tV
Figure 3-14. 02 CEM Data Sheet.
B-76
-------
CO CEM DATA SHEET
Date
Pt
I//7/V*
PN
Ambient Temperature
CRF
Operator
Location
'if
Time
^tf..
/is-*-/
/&*
/3'/¥
X32/
/33r*
Zero set
-
Chart reading
Mo
/
;2,£
/o,g
/Z,o
/?. o
A^
£/
' /u' n. '
I* 1.S
-
CO
cone . . ppm
^
rt
3Z
U
n
rt
=- Zo >^**^
» »
//^
/5-^
• -
.'
**
-
Figure 3-15. CO CEM data sheet.
B-77
-------
COo CEM DATA SHEET
."' ' " . . '','•:'' '' '- ' :
Date / // 7
/
D 7 P < <"
W ^^-^^
Ambient Temperature
CRF
PN
/?
Operator
Location
Time
Zero set
Chart reading
70
cone.,
/tf
Figure 3-13. C02 CEM Data Sheet.
B-78
-------
NO CEM DATA SHEET
. * ' •• "
Date
pbar
Ambient Temperature
CRF
PN
Operator
Location
/0> lo II
Time
Zero set
Chart reading
$<&
No
cone., ppm
N0x
cone., ppm
N02
cone. , ppm
/.5V 9-
/ n
Figure 3-12. N0y CEM data sheet.
B-79
-------
) 5 C\°
02 CEM DATA SHEET
Date /
PN
rbar
Ambient Temperature
CRF &, %> =• ^D - 7.
Operator
Location
Time
Zero set
Chart reading
02
cone., %
5.7
a/.
3.7
• U
Figure 3-14. 02 CEM Data Sheet.
B-80
-------
CO CEM DATA SHEET
3/V
P. cf- 0 > O r-
Ambient Temperature
CRF (I'D " t3t$/_
Operator ^5
Location Si^
%y^^ ^<- ^
/»
*jk-
V * .^.fff^
Time
/yyz
/ysj-
/£OT,
SS/Z
/633-
/S32-
/S.&
AT/
S/
'.-••"
Figure 3-15. CO CEM data sheet.
B-81
-------
C02 CEM DATA SHEET
/r
Date
rbar
J/n/tf
PN
Ambient Temperature
C»F
Operator
Location
Time
Zero set
Chart reading
CQ2
cone.,
/if>3
H.7
14.2
L' 11
U 61
Figure 3-13. C02 CEM Data Sheet
B-82
-------
Boiler Outlet
l_0-minute Data Reduction
B-83
-------
02 KM DATA SHEET
Date
PN
Ambient Temperature
CRF 0a% '-
Operator
Location
Time
Zero set
Chart reading
02
cone.,
/7
HO*
21
III?
ZD
/S"
ii 4%
US?
J.s"
/S-S"
3.1
3.0
3,0
. y
. 1
Figure 3-14. 02 CEM Data Sheet.
B-84
-------
02 CtM DATA SHEET /^St S ( >t\
&f( l£fc fc
Date ///5Yf5" PN J^/S~ - /3
P. *??,3/ Operator DS/ft2
par
Ambient Temperature
CRF #? % -
/I / '
Location o»/ w O^T/zf-
(CD- ^f-o^/ 5-8^ C0T- &ZK-&- - 0- f?}^
Time
'"/J3'£
/"
2V
' 25"
^y-.'T
p^
^^
^C
/£xs.
l&^zuJL /H^5r
(x1
/Ci ~^~ fl
/r /7,.<
.
02 „ .
cone., X
3:7
3: ?
37
^^r
^3
'^f
rf<0
*-?-*%
-**-' s,z
£•?
-T'3
4.7
^,2
^".7
'4'?
¥,^
L^
A7
..
*
•
Figure 3-14. 02 CEM Data Sheet.
B-85
-------
02 CEM DAJA SHEET
Date
PN
Ambient Temperature
CRF
Operator
Location
fa
Time
Zero set
Chart reading
02
cone., %
-mi
1*7-
7 /'
1733
7&S3
57,
37.5'
cs
Figure 3-14. 02 CEM Data Sheet.
B-36
-------
02 CEM DATA SHEET
//W/r
0»te_
>b.r-
Ambient Temperature
CRF #2%= <^°
PN
Operator
Location
Time
Y0<*t
U^
Idll
1327
Zero set
Chart reading
,20,5"
I'O.o
02
cone., % .
3.f
- - 5.00
y,
/
Figure 3-14. 02 CEM Data Sheet.
B-87
-------
02 CEM DATA SHEET
Date
///£//.
>*
ph,r
Anblem
CRF
Time
/-S2/
/S3/
SS*f(
/££/
/&&f
/&;/
• '29.07
t Temperature
UO^.7
Zero set
i
T 7 J /• -3- ~) % (0
Chart reading
33 ' ' ' •
3(
3^
$&
^>>^
10,0
AV« ±
//' 14
(t l\o
, •
Operator
Location
^•W-
02
cone.. % .
77
7.2-
6.7
6.7
7./
6.9
7.1
?.t>
5\4
£^(S /^^
/AiO r 1 €/
l^i
—•
Ovf-fc-f
^
^
Figure 3-14. 02 CEM Data Sheet.
B-88
-------
02 CEM DATA SHEET
Date
pbar
Ambient Temperature
CRF OS/*-- Cc
'/3
PN
Operator VS /
Location
<*-
Time
-no*
mi
m?
S%1
mv
m?
Zero set
Chart reading
!*>>&
U,<
Md
it^/tc.O
/b.S
a.r-
/K ="
/.' • ^'3. ^
I* >°
**•
02
cone., % .
3,^
3.1*
3.7
3*
3.^
2-3
3.o%
5-.Z-
A 7
•
„
%
Figure 3-14. 02 CEM Data Sheet.
B-89
-------
02 CEM DATA SHEET
C
Date
*V»r
Ambient
CRF
Time
"7/7
7?7
137
/&f~7
/o^J
/in
21,5
t Temperatun
Zero set
.
7^5
<--"
>
VD-*,«-r/y*.f/«
Chart reading
j£7
L.7
(s-1'/~
L$
£M
/S" -/5
^5 //^
^/Y*x
^ ^.99f6
O^f^
^
*.
Figure 3-14. 02 CEM Data Sheet.
B-90
-------
02 CEM DATA SHEET
>
Date
Pb.r
Ambient Temperature
CRF_^%J
PN
Operator
Location
Time
//Ytf
m '
o
L }4
to 11^
*^
02
cone., % .
.T.V
L.o
(,,0
if.O
(,,0
L.<
Is.O
W
I*
.,
v
-
Figure 3-14. 02 CEM Data Sheet.
B-91
-------
Date
02 CEM MTA SHEET
PN
P. 2J^, 53? Operator /--/^r /Z%
Ambient Temperature
CRF 0-,.%^ t
» Location fe/i*/tjL^ ,/^r77tv
*Cb-'5,5~&^/3.8t<0 den do-eSr- ~ c> f 7? 6
17
Time
nW
/££,0
/3%- *
;, ?v
/^ At-
.
°2 . -
cone., % c
l.o
3.3
*.f
13
3.b
2^
3,00
r.H
//?
*
*
•-
-
-
Figure 3-14. 02 CEM Data Sheet.
B-92
-------
02 CEM DATA SHEET
* * " • ', '' ." ' '
Date ///7
36 #.
p 2-%l<53- Operator Z>5> //£
bar •
Ambient Temperature
CRF
/y-o
xr.r
/3»o
/fcr
/V,o • • •••
/S.o
A§
/• /y.5
/,. f.3
.
cone., % .
^.6»
3,^
5.7
;?.?
3J
^••/
"O ^^-
^ ' ff
^.7
^.^
^ *.?
5^
/. 5"
..
^
Figure 3-14. 02 CEM Data Sheet.
B-93
-------
CEM Data
5-minute Data Reduction
B-94
-------
Stack 02
5-minute Data Reduction
B-95
-------
02 CEM DATA SHEET
Date
rbar
1U7
Ambient Temperature _
CRF 0\ ''
Operator
Location
A*.
, m
Time
Zero set
Chart reading
02
cone., % .
art
2.0
jnf
7-3
13
i/ti
a
nil
y/v.3
3.11)
1.31
//
Figure 3-14. 02 CEM Data Sheet.
B-96
-------
02 CEM DATA SHEET
/'*/fr
0«te
Pb.r
Ambient Temperature
CRF PL.
PN
Operator
Location
Time
Zero set
Chart reading
02
cone.,
mr
31,
/<*//
•33
L7
LL
•/*-//«
Figure 3-14. 02 CEM Data Sheet.
B-97
-------
-rer H
\ U I
0? CEM DATA SHEET
• -fc •.-..".,. ." .1
Date
PN
1 '
Ambient Temperature
CRF
Operator
Location
Time
Zero set
Chart reading
02
cone., %
77^
31
•. ?y,;>
tf
t/3
tf/i
Figure 3-14. 02 CEM Data Sheet.
8-98
-------
09 CEH DATA SHEET
Date
'3
Ambient Temperature
CRF
Operator
Location
CH
Time
Zero set
Chart reading
02
cone.,
jtf
^7,5"
I???
Figure 3-14. 02 CEM Data Sheet.
B-99
3>
-------
02 CEM DATA SHEET
Date
PN
Ambient Temperature
CRF _ __
Operator
Location
Time
Zero set
Chart reading
02
cone., %
.-at
/r?6
7*3
Figure 3-14. 02 CEM Data Sheet.
B-100
-------
Q CEM DATA SHEET
\ \
Date
rbar
Ambient Temperature
PN
Operator
\ v- • •• •
Location
Time
Zero set
Chart reading
02
cone.. %
77^7
13
1113
• 70, V
Figure 3-14. 02 CEM Data Sheet.
B-101
-------
7
02 CEM DATA SHEET
Date
W
17
PN
Ambient Temperature __
0v* *
Operator
Location
/PA-
CRF
Time
Zero set
Chart reading
02
cone.. % .
n
3*
Figure 3-14. 02 CEM Data Sheet.
B-102
-------
Oo CEM DATA SHEET
. t . '.!<• I : . : , •'
Date
V —
Ambient Temperature
CRF
PN
Operator
Location
Time
liio
;/.r
III*
H><
til*
illf
H^
><^
!/*>
/' ^
)l*b
>j-»s '
Zero set
/i\o
Chart reading
1^->
•2/K
• 113
11.3
•37
- 36. *
.n.y
.7<~.^ '
3^
,37;^
?xf 4,
3f
•
02
cone., % .
---
Ai/S.7,0
„
V
Figure 3-14. 02 CEM Data Sheet
B-103
-------
Qo CEM pATA SHEET
1 • fc *. ;.»•'.'.
Date
Pfc
Infa
i A
3 6 is*-1.3
Operator
Ambient Temperature
Location
Time
Zero set
Chart reading
02
cone.. %
37 o
'MY
Figure 3-14. 02 CEM Data Sheet.
B-104
-------
02 CEM DATA SHEET
i/n/fe
Date
pbar —
Ambient Temperature
CRF
PN
Operator
Location
*• rf-.tfte
Time
Zero set
Chart reading
02
cone., %
/Y7
/.S
2.1
'3,1
-XL
Figure 3-14. 02 CEM Data Sheet.
B-105
-------
Boiler Outlet 02
5-minute Data Reduction
B-106
-------
a
02 CEM DATA SHEET
Date
Pfc
Ambient Temperature
CRF
Operator
Location
Time
Zero set
Chart reading
02
cone.. X
n
it,
lift
/#
9-0
113
•/*;?
/?f5-
Figure 3-14. 02 CEM Data Sheet.
B-107
-------
3 If)
Oo CEM DATA SHEET
• : .-./. .. fY. '•.-. .:
Date
Ambient Temperature
'
Operator
Location
Time
Zero set
Chart reading
02
cone., % .
7f
Mtf
• ;f
/5"lf7
Figure 3-14. 02 CEM Data Sheet.
B-108
-------
CEM DATA SHEET
Date
Ambient Temperature ^
CRF (9 V~J-^ - ( C
-------
(if)
02 CEM DATA SHEET
Date |
V—i
Ambient Temperature
CRF
PN
Operator
Loc
Time
Zero set
Chart reading
02
cone., %
foil
•/fir
o?
-U
tort
-tort
Ml
/c. c
I
13 It-
/.y^
./f
./yp /»"'• AI,
Figure 3-14. 02 CEM Data Sheet.
•B-110
-------
Oo CEM DATA SHEET
. fc f. :• • • ,
/3/V).
Dite lMfr/K PN
' f /
P. Operator
bar
Ambient Temperature
CRF
> Location ^LjJfft Cfe'
Time
Xffl/
ATP-k
/f 3 /
A5",} k
/
-------
7(0
02 CEM DATA SHEET
Date
pbar
Ambient Temperature
CRF
PN
Operator
Location
Time
Zero set
Chart reading
02
cone., %
^///
• n
)1
•//r
n
Ate. 3.
Figure 3-14. 02 CEM Data Sheet.
B-112
-------
02 CEI* DAJA SHEET
nlte
D»te_
V-
Ambient Temperature
CRF
RN
Operator
Location
Time
Zero set
Chart reading
02
cone., %
/oil
Figure 3-14. 02 CEM Data Sheet.
B-113
-------
02 CEM DATA SHEET
lll\K
Ph.r
Ambleni
CRF
Time
7/70
HI$
ill*
Hl
/ i S*
JyvA
f*
$&
L/ "
t Temperature
^^
Zero set
---•••-
/-2-y o
1
•j
i
•^ (cb'-3
Chart reading
'"2^3
2/; V
• ^/;^-
. 0/7, t>
..X7
• 3-C>
• ?s7
<^fj y"
• ^U
1^,3
, ^ v
^ 3
.
Operator
Location
,S5l)/J,SH
02
cone., % a
_ . ., ,
•• •*• •
A^6 fc,P">
"?&//>£.
" ^iL.
(
y x) ^f/
/
^
^
•
Figure 3-14. 02 CEM Data Sheet.
B-114
-------
02 CEM DATA SHEET
Date
'nils
PN
Ambient Temperature
CRF
Operator
Location
Hi
Time
Zero set
Chart reading
02
cone., % e
77
/7
/3.7
7
t
M
/;.
Figure 3-14. 02 CEM Data Sheet.
B-.J15
-------
02 CEM DATA SHEET
i/nfcT
Date __
pbar-
Amblent Temperature
CRF
PN
Operator
Location
Time
Zero set
Chart reading
02
cone.,
•O--
-
Figure 3-14. 02 CEM Data Sheet.
B-116
-------
APPENDIX C
LABORATORY DATA
C-l
-------
PEI ASSOCIATES, INC.
11499 CHESTER'ROAD
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45246
<513) 782-4700
LABORATORY ANALYSIS REPORT
SAMPLE TYPE: COAL
CLIENT: US EPA EMB
PROJECT NO: 3615-13
REQUISITION:6422
RECEIVED: 1/21/85
SAMPLED BY: PEI
REPORTED: 2/8/85
ATTN:
SAMPLE ID:
PEI NO:
PARAMETER UNITS
MOISTURE, TOTAL 7.
ASH "/„
TOTAL SULFUR %
HEATING VALUE BTU/LB
VOLATILE MATTER "/.
FIXED CARBON 7.
CARBON "/.
HYDROGEN 7.
NITROGEN 7.
OXYGEN 7.
CHLORINE 7.
BASIS
BLOCK
1
DY887
7.92
7.88
1 . 40
12640
33.43
50.77
69.95
4.77
1 .59
6.32
0. 17
AS
REC'D
BLOCK
1
DYS87
-
8.56
1.52
13727
36.30
55 . 1 4
75.97
5. 18
1.73
6.86
O. 18
DRY
BLOCK
2
DY888
6.65
7.55
1.42
12738
34 . 38
51.42
70.66
4.77
1.55
7.31
O.O9
AS
REC'D
BLOCK
2
DY888
-
8.O9
1.52
13645
36.83
55 . OS
75.69
5. 11
1 . 66
7.83
0. 10
DRY
SUBMITTED BY:
C-2
-------
PE.T ASSOCIATES., INC.
11499 CHESTER ROAD
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45246
(513) 782-4700
LABORATORY ANALYSIS REPORT
SAMPLE TYPE: COAL
CLIENT: US EPA EMB
PROJECT NO: 3615-13
REQUISITION: 6422
RECEIVED: 1/21/85
SAMPLED BY: PEI
REPORTED: 2/8/85
ATTN:
SAMPLE ID:
PE I NO :
PARAMETER
MOISTURE, TOTAL
ASH
TOTAL SULFUR
HEATING VALUE
VOLATILE MATTER-
FIXED CARBON
CARBON
HYDROGEN
NITROGEN
OXYGEN
CHLORINE
BASIS
UNITS
V.
7.
7.
BTU/LB
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
BLOCK
3
DY889
6.83
6.95
1 .36
12687
34.78
51.44
7O.9S
4 . 87
1 . 6O
7.29
0 . 1 2
AS
REC'D
BLOCK
3
DY889
-
7.46
1.46
1 36 1 7
37. 33
55.21
76. 18
5.23
1 . 72
7.82
O. 13
DRY
BLOCK
4
DY89O
6.50
7.52
1.46
12694
35. 11
5O.87
70.75
4.89
1.51
7.26
O. 11
AS
REC'D
BLOCK
4
DY89O
-
8.O4
1.56
1 3576
37. 55
54.41
75.67
5.23
1.61
7.77
O. 12
DRY
SUBMITTED BY:
C-3
-------
PEI ASSOCIATES, INC.
11499 CHESTER ROAD
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45246
<513> 782-4700
LABORATORY ANALYSIS REPORT
SAMPLE TYPE: COAL
CLIENT: US EPA EMB
PROJECT NO: 3615-13
REQUISITION:6422
RECEIVED: 1/21/85
SAMPLED BY: PEI
REPORTED: 2/8/85
ATTN:
SAMPLE ID:
PEI NO:
PARAMETER
MOISTURE., TOTAL
ASH
TOTAL SULFUR
HEATING VALUE
VOLATILE MATTER
FIXED CARBON
CARBON
HYDROGEN
NITROGEN
OXYGEN
CHLORINE
BASIS
UNITS
7.
7.
7.
BTU/LB
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
7.
BLOCK
5
DY891
6.27
10. 19
2.32
1 224O
34.87
48.67
67.48
4.64
1.56
7.44
0. 10
AS
REC'D
BLOCK
5
DYS91
-
10.87
2.47
13059
37.2O
51.93
71.99
4.95
1.66
7.95
O. 11
DRY
BLOCK
6
DY892
5.93
8. 13
1.75
12786
35 . 2 1
50.73
70 . 67
4.84
1.65
6.93
O. 10
AS
REC'D
BLOCK
6
DY892
-
8.64
1.86
13592
37.43
53.93
75. 13
5. 14
1.75
7.37
O. 1 1
DRY
SUBMITTED BY:
.C-4
-------
PEI ASSOCIATES, INC.
11499 CHESTER ROAD
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45246
(513) 782-4700
LABORATORY ANALYSIS REPORT
SAMPLE TYPE: COAL.
CLIENT: US EPA EMB
PROJECT NO: 3615-13
REQUISITION: 6422
RECEIVED: 1/21/85
SAMPLED BY: PEI
REPORTED: 2/63/85
ATTN:
SAMPLE ID:
PEI NO:
PARAMETER UNITS
MOISTURE, TOTAL. 7.
ASH 7.
TOTAL SULFUR 7.
HEATING VALUE BTU/LB
VOLATILE MATTER 7.
FIXED CARBON 7.
CARBON 7.
HYDROGEN 7.
NITROGEN 7.
OXYGEN 7.
CHLORINE 7.
BASIS
BLOCK
7
DY893
6.22
7.75
1.58
1 2800
35 . 23
50. SO
70.77
4.90
1.49
7. 17
O. 12
AS
REC'D
BLOCK
7
DY893
-
8.26
1.69
13649
37.57
54. 17
75.46
5.23
1.59
7.64
0. 13
DRY
BLOCK
8
DY894
5. 19
7.68
1.45
131O9
35.69
51.44
72.84
4.95
1.49
6.28
0. 12
AS
REC ' D
BLOCK
8
DY894
-
8. 10
1.53
1 3827
37.64
54.26
76.83
5.22
1.57
6.62
O. 13
DRY
SUBMITTED BY:
C-5
-------
PEI ASSOCIATES, INC.
11499 CHESTER ROAD
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45246
(513) 782-4700
LABORATORY ANALYSIS REPORT
SAMPLE TYPE: COAL.
CLIENT: US EPA EMB
PROJECT NO: 3615-13
REQUISITIONS 6422
RECEIVED: 1/21/85
SAMPLED BY: PEI
REPORTED: 2/8/85
ATTN:
SAMPLE ID:
PEI NO:
PARAMETER UNITS
MOISTURE, TOTAL. 7.
ASH 7.
TOTAL. SULFUR 7.
HEATING VALUE BTU/LB
VOLATILE MATTER 7.
FIXED CARBON 7.
CARBON 7.
HYDROGEN 7.
NITROGEN 7.
OXYGEN 7.
CHLORINE 7.
BAS I S
BLOCK
9
DY895
6. 17
8.23
1.42
12722
35.51
50.09
70 . 9O
4.82
1.47
6.81
0. 18
AS
REC'D
BLOCK
9
DY895
-
8.77
1.51
13559
37.84
53 . 39
75.56
5. 14
1.57
7.26
0. 19
DRY
BLOCK
10
DYB96
5.55
8. 11
1.22
12872
34 . 5O
51.84
72 . 25
4.87
1.54
6.35
0. 11
AS
REC ' D
BLOCK
10
DY896
-
8.59
1 . 29
13628
36.53
54.88
76. 5O
5. 16
1.63
6.71
0. 12
DRY
SUBMITTED BY:
C-6
-------
PEI ASSOCIATES, INC..
11499 CHESTER ROAD
CINCINNATI., OHIO 45246
<513) 782-4700
LABORATORY ANALYSIS REPORT
SAMPLE TYPE: ASH
CLIENT: US EPA EMB
PROJECT NO: 3615-13
REQUISITION:6422
RECEIVED: 1/21/85
SAMPLED BY: PEI
REPORTED: 2/8/85
ATTN:
SAMPLE ID
PEI NO.
MOISTURE,'/.
COMBUSTIBLE X
FLYASH-MULT I. CLONE
1/16 DY 897
1/17 DY 898
BOTTOM GRATE BOILER ASH
1/16 DY 899
1/17 DY 900
UNDERGRATE ASH
1/16 DY 9O1
1/17 DY 902
O.O2
< 0. O2
0.04
<0.02
-------
AT'TN;;
P R 0 J E C T M 0: 3 615 - 3. 3
REQUISITIONS 6422
RECEIVED:; 1/21/35
SAMPLED BY;; PE.I
REPGRTED;: 2/6/B'".i
V "T
77?.
:.r:-i .i .1. V--.
THEORETICAL
'ZED !JSli\!3 EPA -ME'THCjD 7A
C-8
-------
COMMERCIAL TESTING & ENGINEERING CO.
GENERAL OFFICES: 1919 SOUTH HIGHLAND AVE., SUITE 210-B, LOMBARD, ILLINOIS 60148 • (312) 953-9300
DAVID M. SELDOM
MANAGER
SOUTHWEST DIVISION
PLEASE ADDRESS ALL CORRESPONDENCE TO:
10775 E. 51st ST., DENVER, CO 80239
OFFICE TEL. (303) 373-4772 TELEX 450937
February 6, 1985
SINCI 1900
Ms. Ida Bennett
PEI ASSOCIATES
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, Ohio 45246
Dear Ms. Bennett,
Enclosed you will find our analytical report of your audit sample //A.
certificate of analysis report #72-140751.
This is our
Due to the small sample material we received (2.9 grams), we were able to run each
analysis only once. Below is a tabulation of our standard runs that were run on the
same day along with the audit sample. All data has been reported on an as run basis.
Ash
Sulfur
Btu
Carbon
Hydrogen
Nitrogen
Chlorine
Volatile
Standard Samples
Known Value
9.52
.9250
11373
42.11
6.47
1.37
0.00
17.19
Daily Run
9.46
.9293
11390
42.08
6.47
1.38
0.00
17.19
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.
Respectfully,
COMMERCIAL TESTING & ENGINEERING COMPANY
Kimberly J. (B/schoff
Laboratory Supervisor
KJB/sj
Enclosure
C-9
iLLY
Charter Member
OVER 40 BRANCH LABORATORIES STR ATEGICA LL V LOCATED IN PRINCIPAL COAL MINING AREAS.
TIDEWATER AND GREAT LAKES PORTS, AND RIVER LOADING FACILITIES
-------
APPENDIX D
SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
D-l
-------
SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
CONTINUOUS EMISSIONS MONITORS—SAMPLE EXTRACTION AND ANALYSIS
Stack Outlet System
An extractive monitoring system was assembled to provide a continuous
emissions data base for NO , Op, CO, and C02. Figures D-l through D-3 depict
the overall system layout, as well as the individual system components.
A single 200-foot Teflon sample line was used to transport the gas
sample to the NO , Op, CO, and CO,, monitors. Because of the severe weather
conditions, the first 50 feet of sample line was heated to 200°F to prevent
line freezing; the remaining 150 feet was run through the boiler house. The
gas-conditioning system consisted of an in-stack glass wool filter, an out-
of-stack heated Balston filter to remove particulate, and an ice-bath con-
denser to remove moisture. The sample gas and calibration gases were trans-
ported by a Teflon pump and were introduced to the monitors through a Teflon
manifold. Each monitor was connected to the manifold by a stainless steel
tee and Teflon line. Flow at the outlet of the manifold was monitored with a
bubble meter to ensure a consistent excess of sample and calibration gas and
as a check on the pressure drop across the in-stack filter.
Initially each monitor was leak-checked by capping off the inlet sample
line to the monitor, pulling a 15-in. mercury vacuum, and checking rotameter
flows and vacuum gauges. An acceptable leak check was indicated by no flow
through the rotameter. The manifold line, sample line, calibration gas
line, probe, and condenser were leak-checked by capping off the probe and
D-2
-------
a
co
PROBE-3/8 in.
TEFLON CALIBRATION GAS LINE TT-
1/4 1n.O.D.<
3 WAY VALVE
S.S. TUBE
HEATED
11 BALSTON
^COALECSING
FILTER
HEATED
50 ft HEATED LINE
STACK
UAL
GLASS WOOL
FILTER
I II fill SAMPLING
PLATFORM
RUBBER HOSE TO PROTECT
SAMPLE LINES
MANOMETER
5 WAY VALVE
CALIBRATION GASES
t
J TEFLON PUMP
SAMPLE MANIFOLD -1/4 in. TEFLON
=
*
ANALYZERS EXHAUST
1 NOl - NOX | | 02 | CO h- C02 |
I RECORDER | | RECORDER | [RECORDER | | RECORDER |
Figure D-l. Stack outlet-CEM system.
-------
BUBBLE METER
S.S. TEE
S.S. TEE
S.S. TEE
TRANSPORT
SAMPLE PUMP
GLASS WOOL
TEFLON IMPINGER
THERMO ELECTRON
MODEL 10A
CHEMILUMINESCENT
NO-NO GAS ANALYZER
EXHAUST
DATATEST
ZIRCONIA CELL
02 GAS ANALYZER
HEATH CHART RECORDER
EXHAUST
EXHAUST
BENOIX INFRARED
CO GAS ANALYZER
HEATH CHART RECORDER
EXHAUST
INFRARED
NOIR
IND.
C0? GAS ANALYZER
EXHAUST
ROTOMETEH
HEATH CHART RECORDER
HEATH CHART RECORDER
Figure D-2. Monitor sampling system.
-------
3-WAY
o
en
CALIBRATION GAS LINE 1 *" PROBE ,
e
* \
CONDENSOR
UJ
z
_J
UJ
1
CO
VACUUM GAUGE
L° ill
SMUT-OFF -L _L _L
VALVE CAP CAP CAP
CAP
SHUT-OFF
VALVE
~T VAr.llllM PIMP
Figure D-3. Sample system leak check.
-------
monitors. A shutoff valve and vacuum gauge were placed on the calibration
gas inlet line, and a vacuum of 15 in.Hg was pulled on the entire system. An
acceptable leak check was indicated by no decrease in vacuum for a period of
5 minutes. (See Figure D-3 for diagram of the system leak check setup.)
This leak check was performed at the beginning of each sampling day.
Upon completion of the system checks, a pollutant profile was estab-
lished by traversing the stack cross section and comparing individual sample
point values for NO , CL, and CO to a reference point (stack centroid); in
A w
this way, a determination relative to possible gas stratification in the
stack was made. A difference of less than 10 percent between individual
sample points and the reference data point indicated no significant stratifi-
cation problem existed at sample locations for Boiler No. 5. (See Section 2
for stratification procedures and results.) After the stratification tests,
the CEM probe was permanently positioned in the stack so as not to cause an
interference while the manual emission tests were being conducted.
System checks for zero drift, span drift, and response time were per-
formed daily on each monitor. Guidelines presented in 40 CFR 60, Appendix B,
Performance Specification Tests 2 and 3, were followed for this test series.
Table D-l summarizes these specifications. The results of these system
checks are presented in Section 3 of this report.
Zero drift checks were made by initially zeroing the monitors with
ambient grade zero nitrogen. When a stable reading was attained, the chart
was marked at the zero point along with date and time. At 2- and 24-hour
intervals, monitors were zeroed and the reading was again recorded. During
the zero drift checks, no zero or calibration adjustments were made. The
difference between each successive reading and the original reference value
D-6
-------
TABLE D-1. S02 AND NOX CEMS GUIDELINE PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATIONS
Parameter
Specifications
1. Response time
2. Zero drift, 2-hour
3. Zero drift, 24-hour
4. Calibration drift, 2-hour
5. Calibration drift, 24-hour
6. Calibration error
7. Relative accuracy3
_<15 minutes
^2.5 percent of s^an value
^<2.5 percent of span value
^2.5 percent of span value
^2..5 percent of span value
^5 percent of spin value
_<20 percent or 10 percent of
emission standard, which-
ever 1s greater
a Expressed as the sum of the absolute mean of the difference plus
the 2.5 percent error confidence coefficient of a series of tests
divided by a reference value.
02 and C02 CEMS GUIDELINE PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATIONS
Parameter
1. Response time
2. Zero drift, 2-hour
3. Zero drift, 24-hour
4. Calibration drift, 2-hour
5. Calibration drift, 24-hour
6. Calibration error
7. Accuracy8
Specifications
<15 minutes
^0.5 percent 0- or COp
-------
had to be ^2.5 percent of span value for NO and ^0.5 percent for 09 and C09.
A ^~ L- C
Span drift checks were conducted by introducing a high-level concentration
gas into the monitors and recording monitor reading and time. These readings
were again recorded at 2- and 24-hour intervals, and, again, no zero or
calibration adjustments were made during the 2- and 24-hour period. The
difference between each successive reading and the original reference value
had to be <2.5 percent of span value for NO and fO.5 percent for Op and COp.
Response time checks were performed by initially zeroing monitors until a
stable response was attained. A high-range calibration gas was then injected
and the response time was recorded when a stable response was attained.
Again, the monitor was zeroed and stack gas was sampled and the response time
was recorded when a stable value was attained. The longer response time of
the two was used as the monitor response time.
A three-point calibration check was performed on each monitor to cover
the low, mid, and high values of the specific pollutant concentrations mea-
sured. This calibration procedure was conducted at the beginning and end of
each test day.
Table D-2 shows the monitor calibration gases used for this test series.
When time allowed, single-point calibration checks were conducted between
test blocks. Calibration gases were delivered through the gas-sampling
system (condenser and sample line) as a check on total sample system integ-
rity.
Upon completion of system checks and calibration of monitors, the probe
was inserted in the stack at the designated sample point. Stack gases were
purged through the sampling system for 10 minutes or until stable readings
were achieved on the monitors. Data were then recorded for the required
D-8
-------
TABLE D-2. MONITOR CALIBRATION GASES
Type
Nitrogen
C02
C02
C02
CO 2
02
02
02
02
CO
CO
CO
NO
NO
NO
NO
N0-N02
NO audit cyl.
NO audit cyl.
02 audit cyl .
Concentration9
Zero nitrogen
4.08%
7.98%
10.12%
15.9%
1.003%
4.034%
8.08%
14.2%
101.8 ppm
199.6 ppm
455.9 ppm
38.9 ppm
91.06 ppm
201.9 ppm
446.1 ppm
NO, 100 ppm
N02, 40 ppm
50.2 ppm
304.7 ppm
3.51%
Calibration scale
Zero setting
Low-range
Mid-range
High-range
High-range
Low-range
Mid-range
High-range
High-range
Low-range
Mid-range
High-range
Low-range
Low- and mid-range
Mid- and high-range
High-range
Converter check
Mid-range audit
High-range audit
Mid-range audit
Scale
N/A
0-20%
0-25%
0-500 ppm
0-1000 ppm
All gases used for this test series were classified as Master Gas certified
with a guaranteed analytical accuracy within ± 2 percent of the cylinder
values.
D-9
-------
2-hour test period; exceptions were made, depending on boiler conditions.
The participate filters and condensers were cleaned as necessary between test
blocks. At the end of each test block, all monitors were zeroed and prepared
for the next test block.
Boiler Outlet Stack
An extractive monitoring system was assembled to provide a continuous
emission data base for boiler outlet 0? levels. Figure D-4 depicts the
overall sampling system.
A single 200-foot sample line was used to transport the gas sample to
the Op monitor. The gas-conditioning system consisted of an out-of-stack
Balston filter to remove particulate, followed by an ice-bath condenser to
remove moisture. The sample gas and calibration gases were transported to
the 02 analyzer by the analyzer's internal pump. Flow at the outlet of the
analyzer was monitored with a bubble meter to ensure a consistent excess of
sample and calibration gas and as a check on the pressure drop across the
filter. Leak checks, calibrations, and other system checks followed guide-
lines used on the stack outlet system. The following subsections describe
each individual monitor and its sensory and sampling system.
DETERMINATION OF NITROGEN OXIDES (NOJ EMISSIONS
/\
Sampling and analysis for nitrogen oxide emissions were accomplished
with a continuous extractive chemiluminescent analyzer made by Thermo Elec-
tron Corporation. This monitor provides an accurate method of measuring
nitric oxide (MO) and total oxides of nitrogen (NO + NO,,).
Sampling Apparatus
The sampling apparatus (shown in Figure D-5) consisted of the following:
Probe - The 0.375-in. stainless steel probe was equipped with a three-
way stainless steel valve that enabled the operator to introduce zero
and calibration gases through the entire sampling system.
D-10
-------
o
i
TEFLON CALIBRATION GAS LINE jt
1/4 in. O.D.
PROBE - 3/8 in.
3 WAY VALVE S.S. TUBE
HEATED
T
APPROX. 150 ft
II BALSTON
COALECSING
FILTER
FLOW
/A
ROTOMETER NEEDLE VALVE
5-WAY VALVE
J S.S. CONDENSOR
RUBBER HOSE TO PROTECT
SAMPLE LINES
SAMPLE LINE 1/4 1n. O.D.
TEFLON
CEM TRAILER
02 ANALYZER
CALIBRATION GASES
I
RECORDER
BREECHING
WALL
EXHAUST
Figure D-4. Boiler outlet--CEM system.
-------
3 - WAY
VALVE
0.375-in.
GLASS WOOL
BALSTON FILTER
S.S. PROBE
a
ro
o
ac
I/I
3
z
o
i
n A
s.
Q.
1
0.
CVJ
o
CSJ
n
&
Q.
-------
Sample Line - A 200-ft, 0.25-in. o.d. Teflon line was used to transport
sample gases and calibration gases. The first 50 feet of sample line
was heated to 200°F.
Sample Conditioning Apparatus - An in-stack glass wool filter and out-
of-stack Balston filter were used to eliminate particulate. A stainless
steel condenser immersed in an ice bath was used to remove moisture. A
Teflon impinger packed with glass wool was the final component of the
gas-cleaning system before the analyzers received sample gases.
Sample Pump - Leak-free vacuum pumps were used to provide a constant
steady flow of sample gas through the analyzer.
Transport Sample Pump - A leak-free Teflon pump was used to transport
gases 100 ft from the stack to the manifold system.
Rate Meter - A rotameter was used to measure air flow through the ana-
lyzer.
Manifold - A Teflon manifold was used to deliver sample gases to each
separate monitor.
Bubble Meter - A bubble meter was used to check flow rates leaving the
manifold and to ensure sample and calibration gas flows.
Calibration Gases - Ambient grade zero nitrogen was used to zero moni-
tors. Three-point calibrations were run by using gases with concentra-
tions of 51, 91.06, 211, and 446.1 ppm NO. NO converter checks were
run by using a gas mixture of 101 ppm NO and 43 ppm NO^.
NO-NO,, Chemiluminescent Analyzer
X
The detection system works on the principle of chemiluminescence. A
Chemiluminescent reaction of NO and 03 results in light emissions (chemilum-
inescence), which are monitored through an optical filter by a high-sensitiv-
ity photomultiplier. The instrument is guaranteed to meet the following
specifications:
Sensitivity Each instrument is equipped with the following
ranges:
0 - 2.5 ppm
0 - 10 ppm
0 - 25 ppm
0 - 100 ppm
0 - 250 ppm
0 - 1,000 ppm
0 - 2,500 ppm
0 - 10,000 ppm
D-13
-------
Accuracy Derived from the NO or N02 calibration gas, ±1
percent of full scale
Response time (0-90%) 1.5 s - NO mode
Typical 1.7 s - NO mode
/\
Output 0 to 10 mV and 0 to 10 V standards. Other out-
puts available upon request
Zero drift Negligible after i-hour warmup
Linearity ±1 percent of full scale
Recorder
A strip chart type recorder was used to provide a permanent record of
NO-NOV analyses.
A
DETERMINATION OF OXYGEN (02) EMISSIONS
Sampling and analysis for oxygen emissions were accomplished with a
continuous extractive oxygen analyzer. This Data-Test analyzer, which uses a
zirconic cell detection system, was used at both the stack outlet and boiler
outlet sites.
Sampling Apparatus
The sampling apparatus (shown in Figure D-6) consisted of the following:
Probe - A 0.375-in. stainless steel probe was equipped with a three-way
stainless steel valve which enabled the operator to introduce zero and
calibration gases through the entire sampling system.
Sample Line - A 200-ft, 0.25-in. o.d. Teflon line was used to transport
sample gases and calibration gases. The first 50 feet of sample line
was heated to 200°F.
Sample Conditioning Apparatus - An in-stack glass wool filter and out-
of-stack Balston filter were used to eliminate particulate. A stainless
steel condenser immersed in an ice bath was used to remove moisture. A
Teflon impinger packed with glass wool was the final gas-cleaning com-
ponent before the analyzers received sample gases.
Sample Pump - Leak-free vacuum pumps were used to provide a constant
steady flow of sample gas through the analyzer.
Transport Sample Pump - A leak-free Teflon pump was used to transport
gases 100 ft from the stack to the manifold system.
D-14
-------
o
en
an Ji n
(V
o
CALIBRATION GAS
3-WAY
VALVE
BALSTON
FILTER
0.375-in.
S.S. PROBE
CONDENSER
TRANSPORT
SAMPLE PUMP
GLASS WOOL
TEFLON
IMPINGER
MANIFOLD
OATATEST 02 ANALYZER
FLOW METER
sn
OXYGEN SENSOR
GLASS WOOL
EXHAUST
HEATH STRIP
CHART RECORDER
Figure D-6.
sampling system.
-------
Rate Meter - A rotameter was used to measure air flow through the ana-
lyzer.
Manifold - A Teflon manifold was used to deliver sample gases to each
separate monitor.
Bubble Meter - A bubble meter was used to check flow rates leaving the
manifold and to ensure sample and calibration gas flows.
Calibration Gases - Ambient grade zero nitrogen was used to zero moni-
tors. Three-point calibrations were run using gases with concentrations
of 8.08, 4.034, and 1.043 percent 02>
Oxygen Analyzer
Detection by zirconic cell. The cell temperature is 1000°F constant.
The open circuit voltage at these electrodes is proportional to the oxygen
concentration on both sides of the cell as expressed in the Nernst equation:
(Eq. 1) E =^log^
where R = gas constant
T = absolute constant
F = Faraday constant
Os = partial pressure of 02 in the flue gas
Or = reference 02 which is 20.95% or 209,500 ppm
The equation reduces to the following when the temperature is set at
1000°F.
(Eq. 2) E = (MV) = 40.2 log ^^
where X is the percent concentration of 02 and E is the open circuit voltage
from the cell.
The raw cell output is logarithmic and is linearized to provide switch-
able scales of 0 to 10 percent and 0 to 25 percent.
Since the cell must be held at a constant temperature, a precision
temperature controller is employed. The heater element, completely inde-
pendent of the zirconia cell, may be replaced without affecting the cell.
D-16
-------
The instrument has detection ranges of 0 to 10 percent and 0 to 25 percent,
and is guaranteed to meet the following specifications:
Accuracy: 0 - 10% scale - 0.1%
0 - 25% scale - 0.25%
Recorder
A strip-chart type recorder was used to provide a permanent record of 02
analysis.
DETERMINATION OF CARBON MONOXIDE (CO) EMISSIONS
Sampling and analysis for carbon monoxide emissions were accomplished by
using a continuous NDIR analyzer. PEI used a Bendix Model 8501-5CA CO ana-
lyzer.
Sampling Apparatus
Sampling apparatus (shown in Figure D-7) consisted of the following:
Probe - A 0.375-in. stainless steel probe was equipped with a three-way
stainless steel valve that enabled the operator to introduce zero and
calibration gases through the entire sampling system.
Sample Line - A 200-ft, 0.25-in. o.d. Teflon line was used to transport
sample gases and calibration gases. The first 50 feet of sample line
was heated to 200°F;
Sample Conditioning Apparatus - An in-stack glass wool filter and out of
stack Balston filter were used to eliminate particulate. A stainless
steel condenser immersed in an ice bath was used to remove moisture. A
Teflon impinger packed with glass wool was the final gas-cleaning com-
ponent before analyzers received sample gases.
Sample Pumps - Leak-free vacuum pumps were used to provide a constant
steady flow of sample gas through the analyzer.
Transport Sample Pump - A leak-free Teflon pump was used to transport
gases 100 ft from the stack to the manifold system.
Rate Meter - A rotameter was used to measure air flow through the ana-
lyzer.
Manifold - A Teflon manifold was used to deliver sample gases to each
separate monitor.
0-17
-------
a
oo
n
z
o
UJ
PVI
ut
z
*~*
o
1
u.
Ul
1-
c
1
n
0.
o
1
o
o
z
*-
—
-------
Bubble Meter - A bubble meter was used to check flow rates leaving the
manifold and to ensure sample and calibration gas flows.
Calibration Gases - Ambient grade zero nitrogen was used to zero moni-
tors. Three-point calibrations were run by using gases with concentra-
tions of 203.1, 101.8, 39.65, and 21.09 ppm CO.
Carbon Monoxide Analyzer
A nondispersive Infrared (NDIR) spectrometer was used for continuous CO
analysis. The infrared gas analyzer utilized a measurement principle based
on CO having a known characteristic absorption spectra in the infrared
ranges. The analyzer contains an infrared detector that uses the nondisper-
sive single-beam technique where alternates modulation of the sample and
reference cells. The reference cell is filled with a nonabsorbing gas and
sealed, and the sample is routed through the sample cell. When CO is present
in the sample, some radiation is absorbed by the CO, which causes the detec-
tor inputs to be unequal and produces a capacitance change in the detector.
This capacitance change in the detector is designed so that the final output
is proportional to the concentration of CO.
The instrument has detection ranges of 0 to 50, 0 to 250, 0 to 500, and
0 to 1000 ppm CO and is guaranteed by the manufacturer to meet the following
performance specifications:
Minimum detectable sensitivity: 0.5 ppm
Electronic response time: 0.7 s to 90 percent full scale
Zero drift: 0.5 percent per hour or ±1 percent for 24 hours,
whichever is lower; ±2 percent full scale over 3 days
Span drift: ±1 percent for 24 hours, ±2 percent for 3 days
Precision: 1 percent full scale
Noise: ±0.5 percent of full scale (maximum)
Linearity: ±0.5 percent of full scale on 50 ppm range; ±1 percent
full scale on 250, 500, and 1000 ppm ranges
D-19
-------
Interference equivalent: C02 rejection ratio, 40,000 to 1
Water vapor rejection ratio, 20,000 to 1
Total less than 1 ppm
Recorder
A strip-chart type recorder is used to provide a permanent record of CO
analysis.
DETERMINATION OF CARBON DIOXIDE (C02) EMISSIONS
Sampling and analysis for carbon dioxide emissions were accomplished by
using a continuous extractive carbon dioxide analyzer manufactured by Infra-
red Industries. Inc. The analyzer used a nondispersive infrared analyzing
technique.
Sampling Apparatus
The sampling apparatus (shown in Figure D-8) consisted of the following:
Probe - A 0.375-in. stainless steel probe was equipped with a three-way
stainless steel valve that enabled the operator to introduce zero and
calibration gases through the entire sampling system.
Sample Line - A 200-ft, 0.25-in. o.d. Teflon line was used to transport
sample gases and calibration gases. The first 50 feet of sample line
was heated to 200°F.
Sample Conditioning Apparatus - An in-stack glass wool filter and an
out-of-stack Balston filter was used to eliminate particulate. A stain-
less steel condenser immersed in an ice bath was used to remove mois-
ture. A Teflon impinger packed with glass wool was the final gas-clean-
ing component before the analyzers received sample gases.
Sample Pumps - Leak-free vacuum pumps were used to provide a constant
steady flow of sample gas through the analyzer.
Transport Sample Pump - A leak-free Teflon pump was used to transport
gases 100 ft from the stack to the manifold system.
Rate Meter - A rotameter was used to measure air flow through the ana-
lyzer.
Manifold - A Teflon manifold was used to deliver sample gases to each
separate monitor.
Bubble Meter - A bubble meter was used to check flow rates leaving the
manifold and to ensure sample and calibration gas flows.
D-20
-------
o
i
ro
A n n
o
QC
in
s
§
OJ
o
3-WAY
VALVE
0.375-in.
BALSTON FILTER
S.S. PROBE
GLASS WOOL
TEFLON IMPINGER
n
MANIFOLD
TRANSPORT SAMPLE
PUMP
INFRARED INDUSTRIES C02 ANALYZER
CO ANALYZER
BYPASS FLOW
CALIBRATION GAS
FLOW METER
NDIR
DETECTOR
C02 SENSOR
GLASS WOOL
EXHAUST
HEATH STRIP
CHART RECORDER
Figure D-8. Sampling system.
-------
Calibration Gases - Ambient grade zero nitrogen was used to zero moni-
tors. Three-point calibrations were run by using gases with concentra-
tions of 15.9, 7.98, and 4.08 percent C02<
Carbon Dioxide Analyzer
A nondispersive Infrared (NDIR) spectrometer was used for continuous (XL
analysis. The Infrared Industries, Inc., gas analyzer utilizes an infrared
light source and a solid state detector sensitive to the infrared spectrum.
The gas to be measured is placed between the infrared source and the detec-
tor. By properly limiting the spectral range of the infrared source with a
spectral filter, the gas analyzer can be made sensitive to a particular gas
(C02) while it remains insensitive to others. The amount of absorption can
then be measured, electronically processed, and a reading displayed that is
related directly to the amount of the gas concentration.
This instrument has detection ranges of 0 to 6 percent and 0 to 20
percent CO^, and it is guaranteed by the manufacturer to meet the following
performance specifications:
Repeatability/accuracy: ±1% of full scale
Linearity: ±1% of full scale
Noise level: 1% of full scale
Zero drift: ±1% of full scale/24 hours
Span drift: ±1% of full scale/24 hours
Speed of response:
Analog 90% or reading in 5 seconds (faster
response time optional)
Digital 90% of reading in 2 seconds
Recorder
A strip chart type recorder is used for permanent record of CO^ analy-
sis.
D-22
-------
DETERMINATION OF STACK GAS MOISTURE CONTENT
The following method was used in this test program. Sampling procedures
followed those described in EPA Reference Method 4 of the Federal Register.*
Sampling Apparatus
The moisture sampling trains used in these tests at the exit stack met
design specifications established by the Federal EPA and was assembled by PEI
personnel. It consisted of:
Probe - The borosilicate glass probe used had a heating system capable of
maintaining a desired minimum gas temperature of 250°F at the exit end
during sampling. A glass wool plug was used to remove particulate mat-
ter.
Draft Gauge - The inclined manometer used was made by Dwyer and had a
readability of 0.01 inch HpO in the 0 to 10 inch range.
Impingers - Four impingers were connected in series with glass ball
joints. The first, third, and fourth impingers were of the Greenburg-
Smith design, modified by replacing the tip with a i-in. i.d. glass tube
extending to i in. from the bottom of the flask.
Metering System - The metering system consisted of a vacuum gauge, a
leak-free pump, thermometers capable of measuring temperature to within
5°F, a dry gas meter with 2 percent accuracy, and related equipment to
maintain a constant sampling rate and to determine sample volume. The
dry gas meter was made by Rockwell and the fiber vane pump was made by
Gast.
Barometer - An aneroid type barometer was used to measure atmospheric
pressures to ±0.1 in.Hg.
Sampling Procedure
One hundred milliliters of distilled water was placed in each of the
first two impingers, the third impinger was initially empty, and the fourth
impinger contained approximately 200 ng of silica gel. Each impinger's ini-
tial weight was then recorded. The train was set up with the probe as shown
in Figure D-9. The sampling train was leak-checked at the sampling site prior
*40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Reference Method 4, July 1984.
D-23
-------
HEATED PROBE
(END PACKED
WITH GLASS WOOL)
IMPINGERS
STACK WALL
o
rv>
THERMOMETER
THERMOMETERS
IMPINGERS CONTENT
1. 100 ml H20
2. 100 ml
3. EMPTY
4. 200 g SILICA GEL
BYPASS
VALVE
ORIFICE
VACUUM
LINE
VACUUM
GAUGE
AIR TIGHT
PUMP
Figure D-9. Moisture sampling train.
-------
to each test run by plugging the inlet to the probe and pulling a 10-in.Hg
vacuum, and at the conclusion of the test, by plugging the inlet to the probe
and pulling a vacuum equal to the highest vacuum reached during the test run.
Crushed ice was placed around the impingers to keep the temperature of the
gases leaving the last impinger at 20°C (68°F) or less.
Single-point, constant-rate sample techniques were used for each test;
sampling times ranged from 20 to 30 minutes.
At the completion of testing, the sampling train was transported to the
cleanup/recovery area and the final weight of each impinger was recorded. The
amount of water collected was then determined by difference.
DETERMINATION OF STACK GAS VELOCITY AND TEMPERATURE
Velocity and temperature profiles were established for each boiler load
condition according to procedures described in EPA Methods 1 and 2.* An
S-type pi tot tube and a 0- to 10-in. inclined manometer was used to measure
the velocity head at each of 12 traverse points. Temperatures were determined
at each point with a thermocouple attached to the pitot tube and a digital
indicator.
The pitot tube and lines were leak-checked at the test site prior to each
test run. The check was made by blowing into the impact opening of the pitot
tube until 3 or more inches of water was recorded on the manometer and then
capping the impact opening and holding it for 15 seconds to assure it was
leak-free. The static pressure side of the pitot tube was leak-checked by the
same procedure, except suction was used to obtain the 3-in. H^O manometer
reading.
40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Reference Methods 1 and 2, July 1984.
D-25
-------
DETERMINATION OF NITROGEN OXIDE (NOJ EMISSIONS
A
The following method was used in this field evaluation project. The
sampling and analytical procedures followed were those described in EPA Refer-
ence Method 7A.*
The nitrogen oxide sampling train used in these tests met design specifi-
cations established by the Federal EPA and was assembled by PEI personnel. It
consisted of:
Probe - The borosilicate glass tubing used for the probe had a heating
system capable of maintaining a minimum gas temperature of 250°F at the
exit end to prevent water condensation. A. plug of glass wool was placed
in the end of the probe to remove particulate matter, as shown in Figure
D-10.
Collection Flask - The two-liner, borosilicate, round bottom flask used
had a short neck and 24/40 standard opening that was protected against
implosion or breaking.
Flask Valve - Two-way stopcock connected to a 24/10 standard taper joint.
Manifold - The manifold consisted of a two-way and three-way Teflon
stopcock and connected 24/10 standard taper joints.
Temperature Gauge - A dial-type thermometer capable of measuring 2°F
intervals from -25° to 125°F.
Vacuum Line - The vacuum line consisted of tubing capable of withstanding
a vacuum of 3-in.Hg absolute pressure, with "T" connection and T-bore
stopcock.
Vacuum Gauge - A 36-in.Hg U-tube manometer with 0.1-in. divisions was
used.
Pump - The pump was capable of evacuating the collection flask to a
pressure equal to or less than 3 in.Hg absolute.
Barometer - An aneroid type barometer was used to measure atmospheric
pressure to within ±0.1 in.Hg.
Sampling Procedure
One sampling point located approximately at the center of the stack was
chosen. The sampling flask was charged with 25 ml of absorbing solution (made
*48 FR, Reference Method 7A, pp. 55072-4, December 8, 1983.
D-26
-------
FILTER
E3I
SAMPLE VALVE (TWO-WAY)
PROBE
PUMP/MANOMETER
VALVE (THREE-WAY)
FLASK VALVE
(TWO-WAY)
,J MANOMETER
FLASK SHIELD
Figure D-10. Nitrogen oxides sampling train.
-------
by mixing 1 liter distilled water, 2.8 ml concentrated H^SO., 6 ml 3 percent
h^C^). A portion of reagents was retained for use in preparing the calibra-
tion standards.
With the sample valve closed, the flask valve open, .and the pump/manom-
eter valve open to pump, the flask was evacuated to 3 in.Hg absolute pressure.
Flask vacuum was determined by moving the pump/manometer valve to manometer.
Leakage was checked by observing the manometer for pressure fluctuation. Any
variation greater than 0.4 in.Hg over a period of 1 minute was corrected
before sampling.
With the flask valve closed, the sample valve open, and the pump/manom-
eter valve turned to pump, the sample apparatus was purged for 5 to 10 min-
utes. The probe heater setting was adjusted to prevent any visible condensa-
tion. With the sample valve closed and the pump/manometer valve open to
manometer, an initial flask vacuum was determined by opening the flask valve.
The sample valve was then slowly opened allowing stack gas to enter the flask.
The vacuum was allowed to drop to 3 in.Hg (approximately 15 seconds), and the
sample and flask valves was then closed. The flask was shaken for 5 minutes
to ensure contact between the sample and absorbing solution.
Sample Recovery Procedure
The collection flasks were transported to the onsite lab and set aside
until transported to the PEI laboratory. The flasks were shaken for two
minutes and the final flask pressure and temperatures were measured. The
contents of the flask were measured volumetrically and transferred to a poly-
ethylene container. The flask was then rinsed twice with 5-ml portions of
deionized, distilled water and added to the same container. The container was
sealed and labeled.
D-28
-------
Analytical Procedure
The volume of absorbing solution was recorded and diluted to 50 ml with
deionized, distilled water. A 5-ml aliquot of this solution was pipetted into
a 50-ml volumetric flask and diluted with deionized, distilled water. This
was used for analysis of nitrite NCL by ion chromatography. A calibration
curve of standard masses (micrograms) versus the peak height (millimeters) was
made by using standard concentrations. A zero reference was determined by
analyzing an aliquot of unexposed absorbing reagent in the same manner as the
samples. This consisted of analysis of the set of standards followed by
analysis of the set of samples, with the same injection volume used for both.
This sequence was repeated and ended with a final analysis of the standard
set. The results of the two samples were then averaged and agreed within 5
percent of their mean.
D-29
-------
APPENDIX E
CALIBRATION PROCEDURES AND RESULTS
E-l
-------
CALIBRATION PROCEDURES AND RESULTS
All of the equipment used was calibrated according to the procedures
outlined in Maintenance, Calibration, and Operation of Isokinetic Source-
Sampling Equipment.*
PITOT TUBE CALIBRATION
The pitot tubes used in sampling were constructed by PEI Associates,
Inc., and met all requirements of Method 2, Section 4.1 of the Federal
Register.** Therefore, a baseline coefficient of 0.84 was assigned to each
pitot tube. (Figures E-l and E-2 show the alignment requirements of Method 2,
and Figure E-3 shows the actual calibration and inspection data of the pitot
tubes used during the test program.)
DRY GAS METER AND ORIFICE METER
Figure E-4 shows the setup used for the initial and post-test calibra-
tion. A wet test meter with a 2-cfm capacity and +_ I percent accuracy was
used. The pump was run for approximately 15 minutes at an orifice manometer
setting of 0.5 inch of water to heat up the pump and wet the interior surface
of the wet-test meter. The information on Figure E-5 (example calculation
sheet) was gathered for the initial calibration, and then the ratio of accu-
racy of the wet test meter to the dry test meter and the AH@ were calculated.
Office of Air Programs Publication No. APTD-0576.
40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Reference Method 2, July 1984.
E-2
-------
TRANSVERSE
TUBE AXIS
\
FACE
*~ OPENING"
PLANES
(a) ENDVIEW
A-SIDE PLANE
LONGITUDINAL
TUBE AXIS
i
NOTE:
|1.05 Dt < P < 1.50 Dt
0.48 cm < Dt < 0.95 cm
(3/16 1n.) (3/8 1n.)
B-SIDE PLANE
(b)
A or B
(c)
Figure E-l. Properly constructed Type S pitot tube, shown in: (a) end view;
face opening planes perpendicular to transverse axis; (b) top view; face open-
Ing planes parallel to longitudinal axis; (c) side view; both legs of equal
length and centerlines coincident, when viewed from both sides. Baseline
coefficient values of 0.84 may be assigned to pitot tubes constructed this way.
E-3
-------
!7
RANSVERSE /<.
rUBE_AXISJ/ ^-/
LONGITUDINAL
TUBE AXIS
(c)
(e)
/PA-
(f)
B2 (+ or -)
Bl (+ or -)
Figure E-2. Types of face-opening misalignment that can result from field
use or improper construction of Type S pi tot tubes. These will not affect
Cp so long as ai and 33 <1Q°, BI and 62 <5°, z
-------
Pi tot Tube No.
PITOT TUBE INSPECTION DATA SHEET
Date 12 lofCZ Inspector
al
Degrees
j°
<10°
a2
Degrees
3.5*"
<10°
Degrees
2°
<5°
Degrees
y.s"*
<5°
Inches
*/
-
Y
Degrees
*J'*f
-
Degrees
0
-
Inches
0. °t(J—
<0.125
P • ()
sin ^'
Inches
^
<0. 03125
Inches
o.f?
1.05 Dt
-------
'BIAS'S TUBE
{ THERMOMETER
v.
UMBILICAL!
I
HETER BOX *„
PRESSURE
CONTROL
VALVE
U - TUBE
MANOMETER
MET TEST METER
Figure E-4. Calibration setup.
DATE
NETt* BOX NO.
•AROKCTRIC HUCSSUHT.P. •
D
Hq.
DRY OAS NETCR NO.
Or i fie*
•anoMtar
oattinq
AH
in. HjO
O.S
1.0
1.5
2.0
1.0
4.0
Gat volume
v«t tatt
••tcr
V
ftJ
5
5
10
10
10
10
Gat volume
dry 9*1
Mt*r
Vd"
ft3
M«t t«it Dry ••• »«t«r
Mt«r
S,-
•r
Znl«t
'di'
•f
outlet
W
•r
Av»r«q«
V
•r
TiM
t.
•in
Tr
AH*
AH
O.S
1.0
l.S
3.0
1.0
4.0
AH
m
O.Oltl
0.0731
0.110
0.141
0.221
0.214
Y
V* *h (td * 400)
vd "b * TT^> ". * «">
AH»
0.0317 AH I
*b Ud * 4'0) [
tw * 4*0) «"| 2
"- J
7 • lutio of Accuracy of «**t t**t **t«r to dry t«*t metui . 1til«ranc« • « 0.01
AM • Orlfie* of prcitur* diff«r«ntlal that fivo» 0.7S cf« of «lr at T0*r wid 2*.*2 tnehoa of
••rcury, In H) . Tolaranca • «0.1S.
Figure E-5. Calibration data sheet.
E-6
-------
POST-TEST METER CALIBRATION CHECK
A post-test meter calibration check was made on the meter box used during
the test to check the accuracy against its last calibration check. This
post-test calibration must be within + 5 percent of the initial calibration.
The initial calibration was performed as described in APTD-0576. The post-
test calibration was performed by the same method as the initial calibration.
Three calibration runs were made by using the average orifice setting obtained
during each test run and with the vacuum set at the average value obtained
during each test run. The post-test calibration check showed that all three
runs were within the + 5 percent range allowed by the Federal Register.*
The initial and post-test meter box calibration data are presented in
Figures E-6 and E-7.
THERMOCOUPLES
Thermocouples were calibrated by comparing them against an ASTM-2F ther-
mometer at approximately 32°F, ambient temperature, 100°F, and 500°F. The
thermocouples read within 1.5 percent of the reference thermometer throughout
the entire range when expressed in degrees Rankine. If the thermocouple did
not read within 1.5 percent, a correction formula based on a least-squares
analysis of the data was utilized. This formula corrected the data to 1.5
percent. The thermocouple was checked at ambient temperature at the test site
to verify the calibration. Calibration data are presented in Figure E-8.
DIGITAL INDICATOR FOR THERMOCOUPLE READOUT
A digital indicator was calibrated by feeding a series of millivolt
signals to the input and comparing the indicator reading with the reading the
signal should have generated. Error did not exceed 0.5 percent when the
40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Reference Method 2, July 1984.
E-7
-------
WWTICULATf SAMPLING ICTER KX INITIAL CAUMATIQN
DATE: / ..r-
CALIBRATOR: ' V \\!
METER MX NO. .
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
1n. Kg
Leak Ch»ck»:
Positive (»1n1«um 5 In. H?0): \.'
Negative (within 3 in. Hg of absolute}: _,j
to exceed O.OOS cfm.
cfS5
In. Kg
Orifice
•anometer
setting
AH
1n H20
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
3.0
4.0
Volume
Met test
•eter
v.
ft'
b/y
10
\c
0
n
If-
Volume
dry gas
•eter
Vd
ft3
"viC- <^7
rrj ;-T-
: ft 0/9
;./; £•&
CM-PI-f-'l
C-Ai.S'7r
'^.i^
^3./^
^.CC6
?/V.Ci<>
c-ft-.fey
^S.|r-1
Temperatures
WtTest
wter
T.
•F
'7^ *.,"
?C, <
7P. q'
10,7
70. <-:
in.S
'm^
7C',5T
7r.^
/? ;5
T V"
16. c
Dry gas meter
Tnlet
T1
•F
"tff
'•&
'fa
r-;c-
'6
Y^
rf^
96
V6
V7
•VI
rr?
Outlet
To
•F
''t f~~
$ "~~
v-T
^- '•"
C'c~
_>•
J(v
•jr.
>,^
^/>
•* /•
^>.
v 7
Average
Td
•F
*r
',« •;
V.'K
'•)!
/'*« / /"^
• / ' i '.
// >/'-'
'.?'!'r
Duration
of
test
•1n
// '°- '
I /' f.-0
Wg
//•'rS'
' '• f.v
fO"^
! t'. <:. f
?-3t
-y /-,^,
O'iii
/ • ,'V
t
Vacuum
setting
In
Ng
cL
3
5
?
3
^
u
T Must not deviate by aore than +0.02 y. Average
AH* wst not deviate by «ore than 0.1S 1n H20.
t
/.W1)
/ 0*("
f,l^
.'^
/.^!
/C^
'o/v
i s\~ '•
AMf
In HjO
/.Pi
/;:>-
/'f
f>l
LyS
/.VC'
/./3
AH
0.5
1 O
\ r
1.9
2 A
.0
1.0
4.0
t
( V,, )( Pb )(Td*460)
( Vd )(Pb + AH/1 3.6) (Tw + 460)
[ .--."- j[ ^1 -£V f.^£ j
( \f\ M 1'i-^f l(i'^S"l
llCC*t M J-'.-Vl \ir?.OS}
(in )( .^x.-co )t>^7c)
(r.' C--! H .'? y 6/ }(£:''? '-T >
{ •''"> )( .7-> .£>••?• ){':"•' y )
(/''"'.'"!/;.){ '';•? •;*-> )( — ".<)
( ;'" u -;'7^ jc''--:-';''i
I/. '''./•'/ .? H •:'-' v.j- 11 '---.o. »
1 '•'• 1( 7:.v JT^' )C"^/r;."")
i/"^-1.': V '• ''.'7- ./:.' J
(Z3 1 "Jf L l' ^ 1
(.•^••^"'X^'?^)
(/?-
r '-vir-^' ;•: i
t^f )( - i i
^.- .. .- ^ ,-..;, .r- ^
•
'(TM * 460)(ff
( vw )
^c'^jrif/'/Vj, )"
"^^fCii/V.^)"
.1 H7 L
"CT-r-< )(//.'•/•)"
.( /''.? i.
"(f-.-Vr .)(.•'". -i''5.)
.( in j.
'I'.:? ?•:*£. $7 \
.( 'v~' L
• •
. ( in i
i
»
"
2
2
2
2
Figure E-6. Initial meter box calibration (Meter Box FB-4).
E-8
-------
PARTICIPATE SAMPLING METER BOX
POST-TEST CALIBRATION
DATE:
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE (Pfaar): ^9.f3Jn. Hg
PLANT:
PROJECT MANAGER:
METER BOX NO.
PRETEST Y: /.033 AHG>
PROJECT NO.
CALIBRATOR:
Orifice
manometer
setting
*
AH
in. H20
*3
/.,
,s
Wet test
meter
volume
Vw
ft3
,0.0
/O.O
/*..
Dry gas
meter
volume
n3
%3H .30V
$33. in
$3 3. VH
ti3jm
*i,r?i
353. 3i 1
Temperatures
Wet test
meter
Tw
°F
65
65
65
6-5
65
&
Dry gas meter
Inlet
Tdi
°F
IP
-,->
7^
76
76
7*
Outlet
Tdi
°F
5*5
£Z
(ff ^^
C~4t^^
(*£
£6
Average
\ '
°F
*«
«.*
7/.-
Vacuum
setting
**
in. Hg
lo.o
/o>0
/O.Q
Duration
of run
0
min
w
u.*°
/,,-
Post-test average***
Y
l-03f
w
I-03L
1,03-7
AHP
/.Of
Lot
,.ot
/.og
AH I"
w
bar
Td+46°
AH/13'6)(Tw+ 460)
(0.0317)( AH )
(pbar^Td + 460)
(T +460 )( 0 )
w
w
)(
)(
( f.73? )(
)( 5^5 )
n 2
*To be the average AH used during the test series.
**To be the highest vacuum used during the test series.
***Post-test Y must be within the range, pre-test Y +.0.05Y
Post-test AH? must be within the range, pre-test AH@ +0.15
Figure E-7. Post-test meter box calibration (Meter Box FB-4)
E-9
-------
(All EMU ON DATA
Calibrator:
Thermocouple No
Reference:
Reference
joint
Mo.
1
2
)
4
Source,*
2
1
3
4
Reference
thermometer
•T
7£
33
aoo
4-7(9
Thenrccouple
kper« ure.
7C
33
_cO(A
/ L ~*~7 O
^7 / */^*
Difference,
»••
0 Itf
o
0
-o.az.
•Source: 1]
Ice Eath
Ambient
Water
011 Etth
**Percent difference
Reference temp. »R » thempcouple temp. »R „
(Reference temp. »R) *
whert »R • »F 4 460
r«ch ptixent difference nust be less then or equal to 1.5X.
Figure E-8. Stack thermocouple calibration data sheet (Thermocouple 203)
E-10
-------
temperatures were expressed in degrees Rankine. Calibration data are shown in
Figure E-9.
DRY GAS THERMOMETERS
The dry gas thermometers were calibrated by comparing them against an
ASTM-2F thermometer at approximately 32°F, at ambient temperature, and at
approximately 110°F. The thermometer readings agreed within 5°F with the
reference thermometer readings. The thermometers were checked prior to each
test series at ambient temperature to verify calibration. Calibration data
are presented in Figure E-10.
TRIP BALANCE
The trip balance was calibrated by comparing it with a Class-S standard
weight, and it agreed within 0.5 g. Calibration data are shown in Figure
E-ll.
BAROMETER
The field barometer was calibrated to within 0.1 in.Hg of an NBS-trace-
able mercury-in-glass barometer before each test series. The field barometer
was checked against the mercury-in-glass barometer after each test series to
determine if it read within 0.2 in.Hg. If it did not read within 0.2 in.Hg, a
correction factor was determined for the last test series. Calibration data
are included in Figure E-12.
ORSAT ANALYZER
The Orsat analyzer was calibrated before each test series by determining
the percentages of oxygen, carbon monoxide, and carbon dioxide in a calibra-
tion gas containing known percentages of each. The analyzer read within 0.5
percent of the known value for each gas. Calibration data are shown in
Figures E-13 through E-15.
E-ll
-------
THERMOCOUPLE DIGITAL INDICATOR
CALAERATION DATA SHEET
Date/I' 33 '-*Z3 Indicator No.
Mfg. Name A^ofb/2-T Serial No.
//
a/&
Cal. device No. /O3
Test Point
No.
1
2
3
4
Millivolt
signal*
O-OOO
3.111
//
-------
DRY GAS THERMOMETER CALIBRATION DATA SHEET
Date:
Meter Box No. :
Reference:
Reference
point
No.
1
2
3
Source *
2
1
3
Reference
thermometer
temperature ,
•T
6$
-z>2-
//(,
Dry gas
thermometer
temperature ,
•F
^
$1
//3
Difference,
•r*«
/
/
3
Outlet
Reference
point
No.
1
2
3
Source '
2
1
3
Reference _
thermometer'
temperature »
•F
^
3^
//6>
Dry 9«c
thermometer
temperature ,
•F
/£?-
2>-2-~
/I5
Difference,
• F*.
/
o
/
•Source: 1) Ice bath
2) Ambient
3) Water bath
••Difference must be less than or equal to +5*F.
Figure E-10. Dry gas calibration data sheet (Meter Box FB-4)
E-13
-------
TRIP BALANCE CALIBRATION DATA SHEET
Balance
No.
Date
Calibrator
5g Error 50 g Error lOOg
Mass determined for
Error
H-fs
,03.
. GO
(00,05
,05-
-,o\
Iff
00
0-15
^.00
0
O-O'O
Error must not exceed 0.5 grams at each point.
Figure E-11. Balance calibration data sheet.
E-14
-------
BAROMETER CALIBRATION LOG
BAROMETER
NO.
Hoi
1 • *** /
Is* 1
Itf
406
PRETEST
BAROMETER
READING
REFERENCE
BAROMETER
READING
•'Mo
DIFFERENCE
000
DATE
CALIBRATOR
OJ/w
u
POST-TEST
BAROMETER
READING
REFERENCE
BAROMETER
READING
DIFFERENCE**
DATE
CALIBRATOR
tf.o8
&IS
0-07
I-/7-P
^WH
tf.6f
Z9.57
0.04
'-2Zr«>"
<8wr
*Barometer is adjusted so that difference does not exceed 0.05 in. Hg.
**Barometer is not^ adjusted. If difference exceed 0.10 in. Hg, inform project
manager immediately.
Figure E-12. Barometer No. 406 calibration data.
E-15
-------
Reference Gas:
AGA Burdox
Cylinder No. 112704
Invoice No. 0382088
Lab Ref. No. VII:46-23
ORSAT CALIBRATION DATA SHEET
Orsat No.:
Gas (circle
C0 CO
Calibrator
mm
I v*
*L
Date
Value Det.
s.Q
5D
.-r.n
£,0
4. %
^—-I
- -H-H
_.. ._j_L44_
...5,7'*
•—.—-\
.1
Figure E-13. Orsat calibration data - 02-
E-16
-------
Reference Gas:
AGA Burdox
Cylinder No. 112704
Invoice No. 0382088
Lab Ref. No. VII:46-23
ORSAT CALIBRATION DATA SHEET
Orsat No.:
Gas (circle one): 02 CCOT) CO
Calibrator
/ *
Date
Value Det.
5.2%
.5.7%
&~0
fak
/Z-3/-W
'/.S
Figure E-14. Orsat calibration data -
E-17
-------
Reference Gas:
Orsat No
.: _ 1p
AGA Burdox
Cylinder No. 112704
Invoice No. 0382088
Lab Ref. No. VII:46-23
ORSAT CALIBRATION DATA SHEET
Gas (circle one): 02 C02
Calibrator
Date
Value Det.
5.5%
41-
47
Figure E-15. Orsat calibration data - CO.
E-18
-------
IMPINGER THERMOCOUPLE
The impinger thermocouple was calibrated by comparing it against an
ASTM-3F thermometer at approximately 33°F and ambient temperature. The ther-
mocouple readings agreed to within 2°F of the reference thermometer readings.
Calibration data are included in Figure E-16.
NO COLLECTION FLASKS
A
The collection flasks used for NO sampling (Method 7) were calibrated by
/V
filling each flask with water to the reference mark. Figure E-17 through E-19
summarize the flask calibration data.
E-19
-------
IMPINGER THERMOCOUPLE
CALIBRATION DATA SHEET
Date:
Thermocouple No
£^ , l^y j>J/
Calibrator: /P»«Jj>/fzF
Reference
point
No.
1
2
Source*
1
2
Reference
thermometer
temperature
F
7Z_
3ZL
Thermocouple
temperature
F
?•*-
33>
Difference
F**
o
/
*Source: 1) Ambient
2) Ice bath
**Difference must be less than ±2 F at both points
Figure E-16. Impinger thermocouple calibration data sheet (Thermocouple 1-6)
E-20
-------
N0x COLLECTION FLASK CALIBRATION
Calibrator
Water
temp, °F
Flask
tare weight
1st
vol, ml*
2nd
vol , ml*
3rd**
vol , ml *
Vol ume
dev, ml***
Flask
number
Mean vol
ml
o r
~72
2116.4
2/2.3.3
4.9
uu
2I2A9
IO23.
-------
NO COLLECTION FLASK CALIBRATION
*Determined by (gross-tare)/p where p is density of water at given temperature.
**Third determination is performed if first two do not agree within 10 ml.
***Must not exceed 10 ml.
Figure E-18. N0¥ collection flask calibration sheet.
-------
NO COLLECTION FLASK CALIBRATION
*Determined by (gross-tare)/p where p is density of water at given temperature.
**Third determination is performed if first two do not agree within 10 ml.
***Must not exceed 10 ml.
Figure E-19. NO collection flask calibration sheet.
-------
APPENDIX F
QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY
F-l
-------
QUALITY ASSURANCE
The following summarizes the steps PEI takes to ensure data quality and
accuracy for any given emission test project.
PROJECT ORGANIZATION AND RESPONSIBILITIES
The project organization and responsibilities of the project team were
generally defined in the task assignment work plan and the site-specific test
plan, both of which were reviewed and approved by the U.S. EPA, Emission Mea-
surement Branch. Specific responsibilities for this field test are shown in
Appendix G.
QUALITY ASSURANCE OBJECTIVE
The primary objective of this test program was to characterize NO emis-
A
sions from a coal-fired boiler possessing stoker gas recirculation (SGR).
These emissions were characterized as a function of boiler load, fuel type,
and SGR.
All procedures used in the collection and analysis of emission samples
were as outlined in applicable EPA reference methods. Specifically, proce-
dures outlined in EPA Reference Methods 1 through 4, Appendix A and Method 7A,
pp. 55072-4 of the Federal Register were used. Performance Specifications 2
and 3 of the Federal Register, Appendix B, were used to define specific op-
erating guidelines for the CEM system used during this project.
F-2
-------
DATA REDUCTION, VALIDATION, AND REPORTING
Data reduction and reporting provide one of the greatest potential
sources of system error. To help minimize this source of error, PEI performs
manual test method calculations by use of a validated computer program.
The field data sheets are set up on standard computer cards to allow accurate
input of data into the computer by individuals unfamiliar with testing proce-
dures. The data printout is then validated by comparing it with the field and
analytical data sheets. In addition, hand calculation checks are made to
validate the computer output. Other data validations are made whenever possi-
ble. A standard statistical program was used to define linear regression
equations for each monitor, based on the calibration of each instrument. A
check of these equations was performed on site and in the laboratory.
PERFORMANCE AND SYSTEM AUDITS AND FREQUENCY
When feasible, PEI performs both performance and system audits. Four
types of performance audits were performed for this test program. Relative to
the manual tests, all dry gas meter systems and temperature measurement sys-
tems were audited for accuracy in the field by the use of a critical orifice
and ASTM mercury thermometers. In addition, the analytical procedure for
nitrogen oxides was audited for accuracy by the use of audit samples supplied
by EPA prior to sample analysis. For the CEM phase of this project, the EPA
provided NO and 0~ audit cylinders as a check of system accuracy.
A £-
SPECIFIC ROUTINE PROCEDURES USED TO ASSESS DATA PRECISION, ACCURACY, AND
COMPLETENESS
Because the precision of the standard EPA reference methods (Methods 2
through 4) used had previously been determined, no further attempt was made to
F-3
-------
assess data precision. These precision results are summarized in The EPA
Program for the Standardization of Stationary Source Emission Test Methodo-
logy, A Review, EPA-600/4-76-044. Both NO and CL gas audit cylinders pro-
X C.
vided by U.S. EPA and Reference Methods 3 and 7A tests were used to assess the
operation of the NO and 09 CEM system.
A £.
Three audit procedures were used to determine accuracy. The accuracy
audit procedures for the dry gas meters and nitrogen oxide analysis were the
standardized written procedures used by the EPA Quality Assurance Division
program. The procedure used to determine data completeness is the same as
that used for New Source Performance Standards, as documented in the Code of
Federal Registers 40 CFR 60, Section 60.8.
INTERNAL QUALITY CONTROL CHECKS
Several internal quality control checks are usually made for each test.
Normally, most of these checks deal with the field sample analysis. For this
test series, PEI analyzed control samples for nitrogen oxide analytical proce-
dures.
CORRECTIVE ACTION
PEI has two methods for corrective action. The first involves the use of
control limits, such as audit sample results, control sample results, and
calibration results. When any of these limits show that the integrity of the
data is questionable, the procedure is repeated and additional data are col-
lected or the data are rejected. The second method involves the use of a red
tagging procedure. Whenever any piece of equipment is suspected of producing
unacceptable data, the entire apparatus or malfunctioning component is re-
placed and a red tag is placed on the item. That piece of equipment is then
F-4
-------
rejected until its ability to perform its function correctly is verified by
the proper individuals. The use of numerous control limits and the red tag-
ging system reduces the amount of unacceptable data and provides a system for
tracking and correcting items and procedures that show an unusually high
occurrence of unacceptability.
PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES AND SCHEDULES
PEI has a very comprehensive preventive maintenance program. Many of the
major components of test equipment have pretest checklists. These checklists
ensure that all functions are checked and that action is taken to repair or
replace any part that shows probability of malfunction. The checks are made
before every field test series; however, only the control console (meter box)
checks are recorded. Even though PEI's preventive maintenance program and
schedule are not in writing, our commitment of three full-time experienced
persons for the express purpose of equipment construction, preparation, cali-
bration, and maintenance has created a program based on experience and skill
that cannot be matched by a written guideline.
QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORTS TO MANAGEMENT
The standard quality assurance procedures used in this test program
generated sufficient documentation to indicate data quality. All evidence of
the execution of the quality assurance guidelines is reviewed by management.
In addition, during weekly meetings of all PEI's EMB task managers and the
project manager, all aspects of the project are discussed, including the
quality assurance of each task. No written report results from this meeting
because all interested parties are verbally apprised of the situation during
each meeting.
F-5
-------
Two other reports, which are not EMB-task related, are made to manage-
ment. PEI's emission test and laboratory groups participate in all national
audits by EPA's Quality Assurance Division, and PEI's quality assurance coor-
dinator, Thomas Wagner, makes several independent checks for management.
F-6
-------
APPENDIX G
PROJECT PARTICIPANTS AND SAMPLE LOG
6-1
-------
TABLE 6-1. FIELD PROJECT PARTICIPANTS
Name
Affiliation
and title
Responsibilities
C. Bruffey
P. Reinermann
D. Scheffel
K. Batt
D. Holzschuh
K. Johnson
M. Wittum
W. Kopels
K. Prout
L. Benson
PEI Project Manager
PEI Field Engineer
PEI Environmental
Scientist
PEI Technician
U.S. EPA - EMB
Radian Corp. Process
Engineer
Upjohn Manager
Environmental Affairs
Upjohn Utilities
Supervisor
Riley-Stoker Corp.
Riley-Stoker Corp.
Coordinated testing activitiy
with Radian, Upjohn, and EPA
personnel. Field quality
assurance; conducted manual
emission tests.
CEM operator; data reduction
CEM operator; data reduction
Assisted with manual method
measurements; onsite calcula-
tions
Project coordination and test
observation
Project coordination relative to
process operation; monitored
boiler operation
Plant liaison and schedulino
Boiler operation
Test observation; monitored
boiler operations
Test observation; monitored
boiler operations
6-2
-------
TABLE G-2. FIELD ACTIVITY LOG
Date
(1985)
Activity
1/12 PEI crew arrived onsite; CEM's set up for overnight conditioning.
1/13 CEM trailer set up and organized; stack sample site setup for
manual tests; all monitor operational checks and initial calibra-
tions performed.
1/14 Finalized CEM setup; calibrations and stack pollutant stratifica-
tion tests performed; initial stack gas measurements and equipment
audits conducted; corrected problems with gas conditioning system.
1/15 Conducted Test Blocks 1 through 3; conducted stack gas flow rate,
temperature, and moisture measurement; collected four Method 7
samples
1/16 Conducted Test Blocks 4 through 6; conducted manual method measure-
ments, including eight Method 7 samples
1/17 Conducted Test Blocks 7 through 10; conducted manual method mea-
surements
1/18 Disassembled sites and monitoring system; test crew departed for
PEI laboratory
G-3
------- |