&EPA
Jnited Stales
Enviror-nricntal Protection
Agency
Office of Air Qi'-lity
Planning and Standards
RTF. NC 27711
EMB Report 88-MIN-Q7C
JANUARY 1989
Municipal Waste Combustion
Continuous Emission Monitoring
Emission Test Report
Wheelabrator Millbury, Inc.
Millbury, Massachusetts
-------
EMISSION TEST REPORT
MUNICIPAL WASTE COMBUSTION
CONTINUOUS EMISSION MONITORING PROGRAM
WHEELABRATOR RESOURCE RECOVERY FACILITY
MILLBURY, MASSACHUSETTS
EPA Contract No. 68-02-4336
Work Assignment Number 29
Prepared by:
CEM/Engineering Division
Entropy Environmentalists, Inc.
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709
Prepared for:
Dan Bivins, EPA Task Manager
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Emission Measurement Branch
Emission Standards and Engineering Division
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711
JANUARY 1989
-------
DISCLAIMER
This report has been reviewed by the Office of Air Quality Planning and
Standards, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, and approved for publication as
received from Entropy Environmentalists, Inc. Approval does not signify that the
contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of the U. S. Environmental
Protection Agency, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products
constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.
-------
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The extensive cooperation and support of Wheelabrator in providing both the
opportunity for an assistance in conducting this project are gratefully
acknowledged. In particular, the efforts of personnel at the Wheelabrator
Millbury facility greatly contributed to the successful completion of this field
project. The assistance and input of representatives from Anarad, TECO, and
Bran & Luebbe are also appreciated.
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 Introduction 1-1
1.1 Background 1-1
1.2 Purpose and Description of the Project 1-1
1.3 Project Organization 1-2
2.0 Summary and Discussion of Results 2-1
3.0 Quality Assurance Procedures 3"!
3.1 Anarad CEMS's 3-2
3.2 HC1 CEMS's 3-5
3.3 Opacity CEMS '. 3'8
4.0 Facility and Process Description 4-1
4.1 Waste Separation 4-1
4.2 Combustion Air 4-1
4.3 Combustor and Boiler 4-1
4.4 Spray Dryer and ESP 4-3
4.5 Ash Handling 4-6
5.0 Monitoring System Descriptions 5"!
5.1 Thermo Environmental Model 15 HC1 Analyzer/Model 200
Dilution System 5"!
5.2 Bran & Luebbe Ecometer HC1 Monitoring System 5-5
5.3 Data Acquisition System (IBM Portable PC) 5-6
5.4 Thermo Environmental Instruments, Inc. NOX Analyzer 5-6
5.5 Thermox 02 Analyzer 5-6
5.6 Anarad AR-50C CO Analyzer 5-7
5.7 Anarad AR-30C S02 Analyzer 5-7
5-8 Thermo Environmental Instruments Model 400 Transmissometer.. 5"7
5-9 Thermo Environmental Instruments Model 701 Multi-Signal
Totalizer (Combiner) 5-8
5.10 Millbury Data Acquisition System 5-8
Appendix A. "Test Request"
Appendix B. Daily Data Summaries
Appendix C. Anarad Gas CEMS's
• Daily and Periodic Check Forms
Appendix D. Anarad Opacity CEMS
• Daily and Periodic Check Forms
• Performance Audit Results
Appendix E. HC1 CEMS's
• Daily and Periodic Check Forms
• TECO Daily Calibration Summaries
(continued)
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED)
Appendix F. Anarad Gas CEMS Audit Results
• Cylinder Gas Audits
• Relative Accuracy Audits
Appendix G. HC1 CEMS Audit Results
• Relative Accuracy Audit Results
• Concurrent HC1 Monitoring Data
Appendix H. Bran & Luebbe Ecometer Additional Information
Appendix I. Process Data
Appendix J. Correspondence
-------
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
Number Number
2.1 Cylinder Gas Audit Results, Unit 2 - SDA Inlet 2-^
2.2 Cylinder Gas Audit Results, Unit 2 - ESP Outlet 2-5
2.3 Relative Accuracy Audit Results, Unit 2 2-6
2.4 Relative Accuracy Audit Results, HC1 Inlet 2-7
2.5 Relative Accuracy Audit Results, HC1 Outlet 2-8
2.6 List of Process Parameters 2-13
3.1 Quality Assurance Requirements 3~1
-------
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure Page
Number " Number
1-1. Organizational scheme for Millbury test program 1-3
2-1. Typical Emissions Data (8/23/88) 2-2
2-2. Typical Emissions Data (9/8/88) 2-3
3-1. EPA Test Method Sampling Trains 3-4
3-2. HC1 Sampling Train 3-6
4-1. Process Schematic, Millbury Resource Recovery Facility 4-2
4-2. Process Data Sensor Locations for the Furnace System 4-4
4-3- Process Data Sensor Locations for the ESP and Spray Dryer System
at the Millbury Resource Recovery Facility 4-5
5-1. Spray Dryer Inlet Sampling Location 5~2
5-2. ESP Outlet Sampling Location 5-3
-------
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND
This test report describes the continuous emission monitoring (CEM) prograa
performed at the Wheelabrator Resource Recovery Facility in Millbury,
Massachusetts as part of the EPA's on-going standards development efforts for
municipal waste combustion (MWC) facilities. Specific background information
about the testing program is included in the March 3t 1988 memorandum "Test
Request - Continuous Monitoring of Emissions from Two Municipal Waste Combustors"
from James U. Crowder, Chief ISB, BSD to George W. Walsh, Chief EMB, TSD. A copy
of this memorandum is included as Appendix A to this document.
1.2 PURPOSE AND DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT
The purpose of the CEM project is to provide long-term data that are needed
to establish the level and averaging period of emission standards and guidelines
for S02, HC1, CO, and opacity, as appropriate, in any proposed regulations for
municipal waste combustors. Source-instailed continuous emission monitoring
equipment was used to obtain measurements of S02, 02, CO, and opacity levels; HC1
concentrations were measured using monitors provided by the EPA. This 63-day
field test program provided 42 valid days of controlled and uncontrolled
emissions monitoring data for a state-of-the-art mass burn facility with current
best available control technology.
The CEM project as described in the "Test Request":
"The CEM test programs to be performed at the Millbury Resource
Recovery facility and the Marion County SWE facility are designed
to provide the long-term data necessary to determine the
appropriate levels and averaging periods for pollutants for which
direct emission monitoring for compliance may be required, and to
select the appropriate surrogates for pollutants, such as
dioxins/furans or HC1, that cannot practically be continuously
monitored at this time...
Continuous monitoring of the acid gases S02 and HC1
simultaneously at the control system inlet and outlet will provide
data to assess long-term achievable S02 and HC1 removal
efficiencies across the systems and the ultimate emissions. These
data will be used to determine the achievable emissions levels and
averaging periods for any proposed standard. Comparative analysis
of the S02 and HC1 removal efficiency data will provide information
to determine if S02 removal is consistent indicator of HC1 removal
. performance.
1-1
-------
The 02 and carbon dioxide (C02) CEM measurements are necessary
to normalize the pollutant measurements to a standard basis (12
percent C02 and/or 7 percent 02).
Measurement of CO will provide data to establish long-term
achievable levels and trends in CO emissions. In addition, recent
NSR permits for new MWC's have specified combustion efficiency as a
surrogate measure of good combustion. The CO and C02 data
collected in this program will be used to compute combustion
efficiency for comparative purposes.
Opacity measurements at the control system outlet may be used
to develop an opacity limitation and an appropriate averaging time.
In addition to the variables that have been specified for
continuous flue gas measurements, various operations parameters
have been specified for recording. These data are normally-
recorded process control measurements that can provide surrogate
information concerning the proper operation of the combustor and
the emission control system."
1.3 PROJECT ORGANIZATION
Figure 1-1 illustrates the organizations and personnel involved in the CEM
study. Entropy was responsible for field testing, on-site QA/QC activities, and
the collection of CEM effluent measurement and process data. Wheelabrator
Millbury personnel were responsible for maintaining proper operation of
Millbury's installed GEMS's, which included performing all necessary adjustments
and corrective action, and providing documentation of CEM maintenance activities
and atypical process conditions that occurred during the project. Radian's
responsibilities were to review the performance test procedures and criteria to
ensure that the quality of the CEM data collected would be appropriate for use
in standards development, and to perform post-test data analysis.
EPA representatives were responsible for defining the objectives of this
project and resolving all decisions that may have significantly affected the
project scope.
1-2
-------
OJ
WHEELABRATOR
COORDINATOR
Tim Porter
MILLBURY
COORDINATOR
Robert Tekach
ANARAD CEM
SERVICE
REPRESENTATIVE
Kent Lemmex
ENTROPY CONTRACT
PROJECT MANAGER
James Peeler
EMB
WORK ASSIGNMENT
MANAGER
Dan Bivins
ESD
LEAD ENGINEER
Mike Johnston
ENTROPY
TEST PERSONNEL
Scott Shanklin
Laurie Cone
Phil Juneau
Kent Spears
RADIAN
DATA EVALUATION
Winton Kelly
Figure 1-1. Organizational scheme for Millbury test program.
3529 10/88
-------
2.0 SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION OF RESULTS
Emissions, CEM calibration, and process data were obtained daily through-
out the two-month test period. Extensive CEM quality assurance activities were
also performed and documented. These quality assurance activities included
daily zero and upscale calibration checks, relative accuracy audits (RAA's),
cylinder gas audits (CGA's), response time tests, and sampling system bias
checks.
The daily emissions summaries, which comprise Appendix B, include hourly-
averaged concentration data, emissions data normalized to 1% 02, S02 and HC1
removal efficiencies, and notes on the monitoring system and process operation.
Figures 2-1 and 2-2 illustrate emissions data from two typical days of
operation during the test program.
*
All S02, 02, CO, HC1, and opacity daily calibration check values were
within the +. 5% of span criteria during the data collection period. The CEM
calibration results are recorded on the appropriate daily check forms, which
can be found in Appendices C-E. Appendix E also contains TECO HC1 analyzer
calibration summary sheets. The calibration procedures and QA activities are
described in more detail in Section 3-0. Records of the Anarad system and HC1
CEM gas audits are located in Appendices F and G, respectively.
Excluding the CO analyzer, all Anarad analyzers produced acceptable
results for the RAA's and CGA's. Tables 2.1 through 2.5 present summaries of
the audit results for the Anarad and HC1 CEMS's. The accuracy of the CO
analyzer could not be verified by performing CGA's. As an attempt to
compensate for the C02 interference in the Anarad CO analyzer measurement, the
analyzer is calibrated using a calibration gas blend of CO and 10% C02. Since
Entropy's CO audit gases did not contain C02, meaningful CGA results were not
obtained. The CO RAA's performed also did not produce meaningful results; the
cause of this problem could not be determined. The audit data are therefore
not indicative of the Anarad CO analyzer performance. Acceptable performance
was indicated by the results of the daily calibration checks which use a gas
blend of CO and C02.
The 02 monitors and the outlet S02 monitor occasionally had difficulty
producing responses to the gas injections that were within the CGA
specifications over the entire measurement range, but responded well to the
audit gases at typical effluent levels. Since the analyzer calibrations could
2-1
-------
Figure 2-1. Typical Emissions Data
S02/HC1 INLET CONCENTRATIONS - 8/23/88
900
WhMlabrotor Iffllbury / Untt 2
800-
700 -
600 -
500-
400 -
300 -
200 -
100
1 2 3 4 3 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
dock Time
S02/HC1 OUTLET CONCENTRATIONS - 8/23/88
190
WhMlobrator Mtllbury / Unit 2
ijr-r
ppm HCI
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
deck Urn*
2-2
-------
Figure 2-2. Typical Emissions Data
S02/HC1 INLET CONCENTRATIONS - 9/8/88
I
£
1.6
1.5-
1.4-
1.2 -
1.1 -
1 -
0.9 -
0.8 -
0.7 -
0.6 -
0.5 -
0.4 -
0.3 -
0.2 -
0.1
Whadabrotor MJllbury / Unit 2
n
11
i i
i i
i i
i i
i i
i i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
HCI
0 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
1
Clock Time
S02/HC1 OUTLET CONCENTRATIONS - 9/8/88
Wheelobrator UHlbury / UnR 2
100
% HCI Removal
~ 80-
% S02 Removal
*' \pprn HCI
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 18 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Clock Time
2-3
-------
TABLE. 2.1
CYLINDER GAS AUDIT RESULTS
Wheelabrator Millbury - Unit 2
SDA Inlet
Analyzer:
Gas Range:
Gas Value:
Average
Response :
7/14/88
Accuracy (%)
Average
Response:
8/6/88
Accuracy (%)
Average
Response :
8/25/88
Accuracy (%)
S02 (ppm)
low mid high
101 218 431
94 21? 468
-6.9 -0.5 8.6
100 217 469
-1.0 -0.5 8.8
94 210 440
-6.9 -3-7 2.1
02 ( % )
low mid high
5.0 11.9 19-9
4.9 12.2 20.6
-2.0 2.5 3-5
4.7 12.2 20.8
-6.0 2.5 4.5
5-5 12.9 21.0
10.0 8.4 5.5
CO (ppm)"
low mid high
20 90 171
11 41 71
6 34 64
Not performed
"Since the plant CO monitor calibration gas contains 10# C02, and the C02
interference could not be quantified, no meaningful results could be obtained
using a cylinder gas audit.
Accuracy (%) = Average Analyzer Response - Gas Value x 100
Gas Value
A limit of +_ 1Q% of gas value specified for an acceptable CGA result.
2-4
-------
TABLE 2.2
CYLINDER GAS AUDIT RESULTS
Wheelabrator Millbury - Unit 2
ESP Outlet
Analyzer :
Gas Range:
Gas Value:
Average
Response :
7/14/88
Accuracy (%)
Average
Response :
8/3/88
Accuracy (%)
Average
Response :
8/27/88
Accuracy (%)
low
26
28
7-7
24
-7.7
27
3.8
S02 (ppm)
mid
101
104
3-0
95
-5-9
102
1.0
high
218
243
11.5
218
0.0
242
11.0
02
low
5-0
6.1
22.0
6.0
20.0
6.0
20.0
(% )
mid
11.9
13.1
10.1
12.6
5-9
12.5
5-0
high
19.9
20.5
3-0
19.8
-0.5
19-9
0.0
Accuracy (%) - Average Analyzer Response - Gas Value
Gas Value
A limit of +_ 10% of gas value specified for an acceptable CGA result.
2-5
-------
TABLE 2.3
RELATIVE ACCURACY AUDIT RESULTS
Wheelabrator Millbury - Unit 2
July 15, 1988
Sampling Monitor Reference
Location Measurement
Inlet SO, (ppm.dry) 214
146
166
02 ( *,dry )
10.5
9-3
CO (ppm.dry) 1
3
1
Outlet S02 (ppm.dry) 11.3
19.2
24.6
02 ( *,dry ) 10.0
10.4
9-0
Analyzer Relative
Response Accuracy (%)
190
137
154 8.6
10.3
10.9
9.7 4.0
22.5
22.2
22.2
12.6
20.6
16.8 9.3
11.9
11.7
10.1 14.6
NOTE: A limit of 15?! of the reference measurement mean is specified for an
acceptable RAA result. (See equation in 40 CFR 60, Appendix F, Procedure 1.)
"A CO relative accuracy result was not calculated since the cause of the
discrepancy between the two measurement sets could not be determined.
2-6
-------
TABLE 2.4
RELATIVE ACCURACY AUDIT RESULTS
HC1 Inlet - TECO Model 15/200
Date
7/15/88
8/4/88
8/24/88
Reference
HC1
(PPmd )
430
595
738
356
452
428
470
692
621
Measurements
Moisture
(%)
12.5
14.4
13.0
13.2
16.8
17.2
15-0
16.3
15-4
TECO
Model 15/200
HC1
378
563
585
368
394
398
384
499
454
432
658
672
424
474
481
452
596
543
Relative
Accuracy (%)
0.1
11.6
10.8
NOTE: A limit of 15# of the reference measurement mean specified for
an acceptable RAA result. (See 40 CFR 60, App. F, Procedure 1
for equations.)
2-7
-------
TABLE 2.5
RELATIVE ACCURACY AUDIT RESULTS
HC1 Outlet - Bran & Luebbe Ecometer
Date
7/15/88
8/4/88
8/13/88
8/15/88
8/19/88
8/22/88
8/31/88
9/4/88
9/6/88
9/12/88
9/14/88
Reference
HC1
(ppmd )
2.0
4.1
3.8
24.0
36.0
6.6
2.9
3.3
40.0
129.0
4.8
3.8
2.6
6.1
8.2
9.3
5.2
4.7
5.2
8.8
8.0
6.8
4.2
3.3
3-5
7.8
2.0
4.8
21.2
4.9
Measurements
Moisture
(*)
19-1
18.5
17.6
19.6
21.7
20.0
19-5
17.0
20.9
19-1
19.6
20.0
19.1
17.2
18.1
19.4
18.8
21.2
20.4
19.8
20.1
19.6
20.5
21.1
21.7
19.0'
19.0*
19.6
18.9
22.4
Bran & Luebbe
Ecometer
(ppmw )
0.5
0.5
0.3
5.5
9-5
1.2
1.0
0.8
17-7
65.5
1.7
1.6
1.1
0.8
1.4
1.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.7
1.3
0.6
0.5
0.6
0.6
3-1
1.5
2.3
4.8
1.0
HC1
0.6
0.6
0.3
6.8
12.1
1.5
1.3
1.0
22.0
81.0
2.1
2.0
1.4 .
1.0
1.7
1.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.9
1.6
0.8
0.6
0.7
0.8
3.8
1.8
2.8
5-9
1.3
(cont.)
2-8
-------
Table 2.5 (cont.)
T\Q +• A
L/ate
9/15/88
9/16/88
Reference
HC1
(PPnid )
4.1
3-0
5.4
3.5
2.6
3-3
2.9
3-3
6.6
3-9
3.5
2.6
3-3
2.9
9.6
10.6
20.0
10.7
5-5
3-3
Measurements
Moisture
(%)
19-9
19.6
18.6
17-3
18.0
19.4
19.5
17.0
18.3
19.3
17-3
18.0
19.4
19-5
19-1
20.3
19.3
17-8
18.7
20.9
Bran
& Luebbe
Ecometer
HC1
(ppmw ) (ppmd )
1.8
1.2
1.7
1.0
0.6
0.5
0.6
0.4
1.6
0.7
1.0
0.6
0.5
0.6
3-2
3.1
8.9
3-1
1.8
0.4
2.2
1.5
2.1
1.1
0.7
0.6
0.7
0.4
2.0
0.8
1.1
0.7
0.6
0.7
4.0
3.9
11.0
3.7
2.2
0.5
"Moisture data were not available for these sample runs on
9/12; therefore, 19# H20 was used for the conversion
to dry-basis.
NOTE: The reference measurements obtained on 9/15 and 9/16
are averages of duplicate samples collected during
each run.
2-9
-------
not be improved further and since the RAA's indicated acceptable analyzer
performance, it was decided that the <$% CGA criterion specified in the work plan
for the mid- and high-level audit points should be relaxed to <10% of the gas
value.
The results of these audits, though acceptable, did consistently indicate a
positive bias in the 02 measurements at both locations. Although the magnitude of
the bias was not large enough to indicate poor analyzer performance, a correction
for this bias was made to improve the accuracy of the emissions data. The audit
data were graphed and linear regression analyses were performed. In the typical
effluent measurement range, 8-12/K 02, the inlet and outlet 02 analyzer readings
appear to be biased approximately +0.5# and +0.8% 02, respectively. The
corrections for these biases, determined using all RAA and CGA results, have been
incorporated in the daily summaries. (The S02 removal efficiencies increased by
less than 1% with the changes to the 02 data.) A specific example of how these
corrections impact the actual emissions data and removal efficiencies can be found
in Appendix J (Memo to EPA dated August 18, 1988, Attachment B).
All S02 and 02 system bias checks were within the 5% limit specified in the
work plan. The results indicated that the differences in response between direct
gas injections and injections through the entire system are primarily due to early
recordings of calibration readings by the DAS before stable responses were
achieved. Records of these checks can be found on page 2 of the OEMS Daily Check
Form. The response times of all the analyzers and sampling equipment were well
within the 15 minute limit specified in the work plan. The response time tests
were conducted in conjunction with the performance of the CGA's.
Each of the RAA's performed on the TECO HC1 CEMS at the inlet indicated
acceptable monitor performance. The RAA data for the HC1 CEMS's are contained in
Appendix G. Moisture determinations were made concurrently with all HC1 RAA's to
allow comparison between dry-basis reference measurements and wet-basis CEM
responses. Based on the moisture results obtained during the initial RAA's,
moisture values of 14 and 18 percent were used throughout the project to correct
the inlet and outlet HC1 data, respectively.
In addition to identifying extremely low HC1 emissions, the initial
relative accuracy testing performed on the Bran & Luebbe (B&L) CEMS at the outlet
location indicated a consistent low bias in the analyzer measurements. (The Bean
of the B&L and reference measurements for this audit were 0.5 ppm and 3-3 PPn HC1,
respectively.) Additional comparative samples were collected throughout the
project in an attempt to quantify the bias and identify any change in the
operational status of the B&L. (CGA's could not be used as an accuracy check due
2-10
-------
to B&L design.) Computing relative accuracies using the mean reference value
becomes unnecessarily restrictive at low pollutant levels. Therefore, the HC1
relative accuracy specification was changed to £ 15?! of the measured value or
£ 5 ppm HC1, whichever is least restrictive.
Two sets of reference measurement data were obtained at the outlet: 30
single sampling train test runs conducted from July 15 through September Ik, and 15
dual sampling train test runs conducted on September 15 and 16, 1988. The
duplicate samples provided a means of minimizing the impact of imprecision in the
reference sampling method. (The duplicate impinger sampling was performed to
support another EPA project involving the measurement of HC1.)
Linear regression analysis was performed on these two relative accuracy
data sets to determine if (1) a relationship exists between the B&L CEMS and
reference measurement data, and (2) the bias can be quantified and the measurement
data systematically corrected to improve the quality of the data. The analysis
performed on the first data set, which included the first 30 test runs but excluded
the five test runs with reference measurements over 10 ppm, provided a low
correlation coefficient. This indicates that no conclusion could be drawn
concerning the relationship between the B&L CEM and reference measurements at low
HC1 levels other than that the B&L measurements were lower than the reference
measurements. In contrast, comparison of the B&L data with the dual sampling train
data collected on September 15 and 16 produced a correlation coefficient of 0.96.
Analysis of this second set of data indicates that a relationship or trend in the
data does exist, and actual effluent measurement values may be estimated from the
B&L data based on least squares analysis of relative accuracy test data. (As a
simple approximation, the B&L measurement values < 10 ppm could be multiplied by a
factor of 2, which would improve the accuracy of approximately 90% of all B&L
measurements.) It should be noted that these performance audits provide point-in-
time accuracy assessments and are limited to concentration levels occurring during
the tests. Further analysis might show that the relationship indicated at the end
of the study could be applied to the B&L measurement data collected during the
previous two months.
The TECO HC1 CEMS was installed at the outlet location and operated at a
lower dilution ratio during the final four days of the field test. Comparison of
continuous TECO/B&L CEM data provides additional verification that the variations
in the B&L data are indicative of actual changes in the effluent HC1
concentrations. Appendix H contains the additional information concerning the
verification of accuracy of the B&L CEMS.
2-11
-------
Although the correction previously mentioned increases the actual HC1
outlet concentration, it does not significantly impact the HC1 removal
efficiencies. (A typical removal efficiency using uncorrected emissions was 99-5"
99.9X versus 98.0-99.0/U using corrected values.) No HC1 corrections have been
included in the data summaries contained in Appendix B.
CGA's were not performed on the TECO HC1 OEMS because there were no
independent HC1 audit calibration gases available. Performance of the CGA using
the daily calibration cylinder gases would not satisfy the objective of the audit.
Acceptable results were obtained during the opacity monitor performance
audit conducted early in the test program. Except for several days of monitor
down-time due to lightning damage, the monitor operated normally during the two-
month test period. All opacity CEMS daily calibration checks were within
^ 2.5# opacity relative to the calibration filter value. No adjustments to the
instrument were needed during the test program. Opacity quality assurance
activities are documented in Appendix D.
Seventeen operating parameters were monitored during the test program. The
Bailey Net 90 operation control system was configured to record instantaneous
values for each of the parameters once each hour during the entire test program.
These data were printed once each day. It was not possible to output this
information to a disk file with the equipment available. The operator's logbook
was also reviewed to identify any process/control system conditions that may have
influenced the emissions, but were not indicated by the point-in-time data recorded
by the computer. This information is included on the corrected daily data
summaries.. The parameters monitored are listed in Table 2.6 and printouts of the
recorded process data are in Appendix I. Schematics showing the monitoring points
in the process are in Section 4.0.
2-12
-------
TABLE 2.6. LIST OF PROCESS PARAMETERS
Total Steam Flow (klb/hr)
Natural Gas Flow (kscfh)
Primary Air Pressure ("H20)
Secondary Air Pressure ("H20)
Undergrate Air Temperature (°F)
02 Concentration (%)
Average Superheater Outlet Temperature (°F)
SDA Inlet Gas Pressure ("H20)
Precipitator Out Pressure ("H20)
Flue Gas Out Temperature (°F)
SDA Gas Out Temperature (°F)
Precipitator Out Temperature (°F)
ESP Voltage 1 (KV)
^ESP Voltage 2 (KV)
ESP Voltage 3 (KV)
Lime Slurry Concentration (%)
SDA Dilution Water Flow (gpm)
2-13
-------
3.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDURES
Quality assurance (QA) activities were developed for use during this project
to ensure that the effluent measurement data collected from the CEMS's were of
the quality necessary for use in the development of emissions standards. These
QA procedures and corresponding limits are derived from the QA/QC requirements
specified in 40 CFR 60.13, Subparts D and Da, and Appendix F, Procedure 1. These
criteria, shown in Table 3.1, were used to accept/reject data and/or to initiate
corrective actions. The criteria reflect consideration of the specific CEMS
operating conditions at the Millbury facility, the impact of measurement error on
the EPA's use of the data to support standards with various averaging times, and
the expected level of CEM performance. The criteria, agreed upon by EPA, Radian,
and Entropy, were a compromise between competing constraints; namely, tighter
specifications would improve accuracy and precision, but would exclude more data,
possibly unnecessarily.
TABLE 3.1 QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
QA Check
Cylinder Gas Audit
Relative Accuracy Audit
Zero/Span Drift (24-hour)
System Bias
Response Time
Acceptance Criteria
+_ 10% of gas value
+_ 15% of reference mean
+_ 5% of span
+_ 5% of span
< 15 minutes
In addition to the criteria established for specific QA procedures, a valid
data day was defined as being >_ 18 valid hours of monitoring data from all
systems concurrently and a valid hour was defined as >^ 50/K data availability.
This section describes the QA activities performed on the monitoring
equipment during this project. Data from the Anarad NOX monitor located at the
ESP outlet were recorded during the project; however, audits and other QA
activities were not performed for the NOX monitor.
3-1
-------
3.1 ANARAD CEMS's
An initial CEMS performance evaluation was conducted to determine the
operational status of the CEMS's at the outset of the project, and also to
compare the results of the various performance tests. These comparisons were
used to verify that the different audits provided the same indication of OEMS
performance.
After an inspection of the CEMS's was performed to identify potential
problems or malfunctions, a response time test was performed to quantify the
system response time and to verify the absence of adsorption/desorption effects
in the sampling system. An upscale response time was determined as the time
required for the CEMS to achieve a stable response alternating between the zero
gas and the effluent. Similarly, the downscale response time was measured for
the step change between the high range gas and the effluent. Response times of
less than 15 minutes indicated acceptable performance.
A sampling system bias check was performed to provide a check of the
integrity of the sample handling/sample conditioning systems (e.g., presence of
condensate in the system, sample line leaks, etc.). Since the daily calibration
checks introduce calibration gases directly to the analyzers, the system
calibrations were intended to verify that the analyzer calibration checks
adequately reflect the status of the system. The difference, if any, between the
analyzer and system calibration results was interpreted as system bias. Cylinder
gas was injected directly into each analyzer and the responses recorded. The gas
was then injected into the sampling system at a point downstream of the probe and
upstream of the coalescing filter within the sample conditioning enclosure. The
difference between the analyzer responses to the two gas injections was required
to be less than 5 percent of the gas value. If the difference exceeded 5
percent, the effluent measurement data were corrected as necessary.
Two performance audit techniques were used to evaluate the quality of the
data produced by the CEMS's. The cylinder gas audit (CGA) and the relative
accuracy audit (RAA) provide point-in-time measurements of accuracy. Accuracy is
measured relative to a reference value (i.e., cylinder gas concentration for the
CGA and EPA test method mean for the RAA).
CGA's were performed using EPA Protocol 1 calibration gases to evaluate both
the accuracy and linearity of each measurement system. The CEMS's were
challenged with the cylinder gases three times at each of three audit points
across the measurement range. The three audit points were approximately 20. 50,
3-2
-------
cylinder gases.were injected into the sampling system at a point immediately
downstream of the sample probe and upstream of the coalescing filter. The gases
were allowed to flow through the system until a stable response was indicated on
the AR-2000 computer screen located in the CEM enclosure. The instantaneous
readings were manually recorded from the Anarad data acquisition system (DAS)
since the shortest averaging period available on the DAS printout was 6 minutes.
Acceptable performance was indicated if the average of the three CEMS responses
at each audit point was within +_ 10% of the cylinder gas value.
An initial three-run RAA was conducted to further determine and document the
accuracy of the CEMS data. EPA Methods 3, 6, and 10 were used to obtain the
comparative effluent reference measurements. The equipment used to perform these
test methods is illustrated in Figure 3~1« The analyses of the collected refer-
ence samples were performed on-site. The relative difference between the mean of
the reference values and the mean CEMS responses were used to determine CEMS
accuracy. The acceptance criterion used for this project was a mean difference
of <^ 15 percent of the reference value (based on the results of three test runs).
If the CEMS only slightly exceeded the acceptance limit (i.e., 3~run accuracy
audit value between 15 and 20 percent), the full 9~run relative accuracy test was
to be completed and the +_ 20 percent relative accuracy specification would be
used as the acceptance criterion.
If problems were identified during this initial monitor evaluation,
Wheelabrator personnel were to be notified and a decision made whether to fix
the problem if possible, or to proceed with the study.
A daily check of the CEMS operation status was performed, and the results
recorded on the gas CEMS daily check forms. The daily checks included:
(1) Examination of fault indicators or alarm messages, both in the actual
instrumentation and the data acquisition system, including recorders and
printers;
(2) Daily zero and span checks for each monitor (because of the CEMS design,
the daily zero and span checks are performed by injecting calibration gases
directly into the analyzers);
(3) Checks of other parameters found to be indicative of CEMS performance; and
(4) Review of the Millbury/Anarad records of CEMS maintenance, process
problems, etc.
The following performance criteria were used for the daily checks:
(a) If zero or span drift exceeded +_ 5 percent of span, the CEMS calibration
was adjusted, and the zero and span check was repeated to demonstrate that
the system was properly calibrated.
3-3
-------
STACK WALL
D
Hi
SAMPLING PROBE
GLASS
WOOL
FILTER
TED
7
I
1
i
1
jr •
HEAT
TAPE— v
J >
r^
kSS WOOL
PLUG
\
~~\ THREE-WAY
GLASS .
STOPCOCK-^
ROTAMETER
THERMOMETER .
PROBE
PURGE
MIDGET
IMPINGERS
MAE WEST
IMPINGER DRYWQ TUBE
TEDLAR
BAG
^— MLU_/V
SILICA GEL
•80*IPA 15mL
15 mL
PUMP
METHOD 6 902 SAMPLING TRAIN
VACUUM
GAUGE
NEEDLE
VALVE
METHODS 3 A10 SAMPLING TRAIN
3529 1(V8B
Figure 3-1. EPA Test Method SamplingTralns.
-------
(b) If zero or span drift exceeds +_ 10 percent of span, the 3-point CGA was
performed. The cause of the drift was identified and resolved, and the
monitor calibration adjusted to be within the *_ 5 percent of span limit as
indicated by a successful zero/span check following all adjustments. Data
collected with zero/span errors greater than +_ 10 percent of span were
considered invalid unless the cause of drift was identified and an
appropriate mathematical correction applied to the data on the CGA results.
Periodic checks involving more extensive evaluations of the CEMS were
performed to supplement the daily checks. The periodic checks included:
(1) A detailed inspection of the entire CEMS;
(2) A three-point CGA (since acceptable results were obtained from the
initial CGA's and RAA's, subsequent audits consisted only of CGA's); and
(3) Preventive and/or routine maintenance activities as recommended by the
manufacturer and/or service personnel.
Wheelabrator and/or Anarad personnel were responsible for performing
necessary adjustments and corrective action for the Anarad CEMS's and recording
all adjustments, repairs, etc. in the CEMS log book.
3.2 HC1 CEMS's
After the TECO CEMS was installed at the spray dryer inlet location and
satisfactorily completed the start-up, the dilution ratio of the TECO probe was
verified by injecting carbon monoxide (CO) calibration gases through the
measurement system and recording the response of a CO analyzer. The TECO CEMS
was calibrated using HC1 cylinder gas. The gases were injected into the system
at a point within the sample probe, upstream of the critical orifice, so that the
calibration gas followed the same path as the flue gas sample.
A Relative Accuracy Audit (RAA) was performed on the TECO CEMS by conducting
three runs of wet-chemical impinger sampling for HC1 simultaneously with HC1
monitoring during preliminary testing to validate the TECO measurement data.
Concurrent moisture sampling was performed to facilitate comparison of the
impinger sampling data and monitoring results. The HC1 relative accuracy
sampling was performed according to a proposed EPA test method for HC1. The
sampling train for this method is shown in Figure 3-2. Although chlorine is not
traditionally a combustion product from municipal waste combustors, the method is
designed to capture only HC1 in the impingers containing 0.1N H2S04, while C12
3-5
-------
HEATED
PROBE
7
• STACK WALL
HEAT
TAPE
PURGE
MIDGET
IMPINGERS
•GLASS WOOL
PLUG
THREE-WAY
GLASS
STOPCOCK-
THERMOMETER
\
VACUUM
GAUGE
NEEDLE
VALVE
SURGE
TANK
Figure 3-2. HCI SampfingTrain.
4128 6/88
-------
would pass .through these impingers and be removed by the caustic solution. The
relative difference between the mean of the wet-chemical values and the mean of
the TECO CEMS responses was used to assess the accuracy of the TECO measurement of
the effluent. The acceptance criterion was a mean difference of £ 153! of the
impinger sampling result. Preliminary results were obtained on the spray dryer
inlet impinger samples by on-site mercuric nitrate titration, but final results
were obtained by analysis using ion chromatography.
Initial performance testing on the Bran & Luebbe HC1 CEMS at the ESP outlet
also consisted of a three-run RAA, as described above for the TECO CEMS. Since
the CEMS design does not allow the injection of calibration gases at any point
along the sample handling system, a dynamic calibration using cylinder gas could
not be conducted. On-site titration analysis was not performed on the ESP outlet
impinger samples because the outlet HC1 effluent concentrations were expected to
be below the quantifiable detection limit of 20 ppm HC1 for the mercuric nitrate
titration. These samples were shipped to Entropy's laboratory for in-house
analysis by ion chromatography.
Any problems indicated by either of the performance tests were investigated
and resolved as necessary prior to the initiation of the test program.
A daily inspection of the HC1 sampling systems was performed to determine
the CEMS operation status. The results of these checks were recorded on the HC1
daily check form.
Upon completion of the inspection of both systems (i.e., particulate
filters, gas flow rates, pressures, vacuums, etc.), the daily zero and span check
was performed on the TECO CEMS using calibration gases. The gases were injected
into the sampling system at the probe. The following performance criteria were
used for the daily checks:
(1) If the TECO zero or span drift was less than +_ 5 percent of span, the
CEMS calibration was adjusted. No adjustment was made if the response
was within 10 ppm of the gas value (i.e., < 0.5 percent of span).
(2) If zero or span drift exceeded ^ 5 percent of span, the cause of the
drift was investigated and resolved, and the monitor calibration
adjusted. The HC1 measurement data collected during this drift period
was adjusted assuming linear drift based on the pre- and post-period
calibration results.
The daily check of the Bran & Luebbe CEMS involved only the internal
calibration routine using two liquid standards because the CEMS design does not
allow the introduction of calibration gases. The result of the calibration is
used in the calculation of subsequent measurement values. If any of the
3-7
-------
calibration parameters exceed a particular value, the OEMS generates a fault
condition and ceases operation until the problem is resolved. The calibration
parameters were recorded on the daily check form.
Periodic checks involving more extensive evaluations of the GEMS's were
performed to supplement the daily checks. These checks included:
(1) Preventive maintenance activities as recommended by the manufacturer;
and
(2) A three-run RAA conducted at approximately 2-3 week intervals.
3.3 OPACITY CEMS
The initial check of the opacity CEMS consisted of an audit in accordance
with the procedures and acceptance criteria described in "Performance Audit
Procedures for Opacity Monitors," EPA 600/8-87-025 (April 198?). The audit
included a check of the simulated zero opacity condition using the audit jig
provided by Entropy. -
A simple daily check procedure and data form were developed. The daily
check was performed from the monitor control unit and included a check of fault
indicators and observation of the daily zero/span check results. If daily check
results exceeded +_ 2.5% opacity, the CEMS was adjusted. The calibration data for
the Unit #2 transmissometer are recorded only on strip charts.
Periodic checks of the opacity CEMS included:
(1) cleaning of the optical windows;
(2) a check of the optical alignment;
(3) a check of the simulated zero level using the external audit jig; and
(4) inspection of the purge air system.
The periodic checks were documented on the appropriate data form. The hourly-
averaged opacity data are included on the daily data summaries.
3-8
-------
4.0 FACILITY AND PROCESS DESCRIPTION
The Millbury facility consists of two identical furnace, boiler, and flue
gas treatment systems that exhaust into one common stack. The process schematic
is shown in Figure 4-1. Municipal solid waste (MSW) is charged to a Babcock and
Wilcox waterwall furnace and boiler unit that is equipped with a Von Roll
reciprocating, inclined grate. Auxiliary fuel (natural gas) is generally used
only during startup and shutdown. The furnace flue gases pass up through the
waterwall section of the furnace and then into a superheater, generator, and
economizer heat transfer passes. Each furnace is equipped with a spray dryer and
electrostatic precipitator (ESP) system to control acid gases and particulate
emissions. The flue gas then exhausts to the atmosphere through a 365-foot high
reinforced concrete stack which is common to both units.
Each furnace is designed to process 750 tons/day of MSW. The Millbury
facility was designed, constructed and is operated by Wheelabrator Environmental
Systems, Inc. Each boiler is rated to produce about 190,000 Ib/hr of
superheated steam at 825°F and 850 psia. The combined steam from the two units
is supplied to a turbine/generator set which is rated at 40 megawatts. The
electricity is sold to a utility grid.
4.1 WASTE SEPARATION
The only waste preparation involves the removal of large pieces of metal
prior to incineration. Hospital and radioactive wastes are not accepted at the
facility.
4.2 COMBUSTION AIR
The forced-air combustion air fan draws air from the tipping floor area and
enclosed receiving pit area. The air is split to provide the primary and
secondary air supply. The primary air passes through a steam air heater prior to
being directed to the undergrate air plenums. The secondary air is not heated
and passes through a separate secondary air fan prior to the overfire nozzle
headers. The slightly negative pressure in the tipping floor area prevents the
release of odors created by the solid waste and dust.
4.3 COMBUSTOR AND BOILER
The combustor and boiler are combined into one unit that is manufactured by
Babcock and Wilcox. The boiler is rated at 190,000 Ib/hr of superheated system
4-1
-------
Jr
I
I\J
ELECTROSTATIC
PRECIPITATOR
SPRAY
DRYER
ABSORBER
Plant OEMS
TO GRIZZLY
AND TRUCKS
STACK
Figure 4-1. Process Schematic, Military Resource Recovery Facility.
3529 10/88
-------
at 825°F and 850 psia (323 million Btu/hr maximum Btu input). The combustor/
boiler unit was designed to ensure the refuse is exposed to temperatures greater
than 1800°F and a residence time of at least one second.
The grate is an inclined, reciprocating grate located at the bottom of the
furnace. The fuel from the feed chute enters at the upper end of the grate.
Auxiliary fuel (natural gas) is generally not needed to maintain steam load or
minimum flue gas temperatures.
The furnace is maintained under a negative draft. An induced-draft fan,
located just before the stack, is used to draw out the combustion gases. Two
forced-draft fans are used to supply the primary and secondary combustion air.
In addition to the waterwalls in the furnace combustion zone, the heat
recovery system includes superheater, generator, and economizer sections. At the
exit of the economizer, the flue gas temperature is approximately 700°F. Figure
4-2 shows the locations of the process data sensors in the furnace system.
k.k SPRAY DRYER AND ESP
The combustion gases from the furnace first enter a spray dryer designed by
Wheelabrator Air Pollution Control Systems. Slaked lime, along with metered
dilution water for temperature control, is injected into the dryer vessel. The
slurry water is evaporated by the flue gas heat and the acid gases react with the
lime. In addition, particulate and excess lime serve as nucleation points for
volatile organic compounds (VOC) and metal adsorption and agglomeration.
The lime slurry feedrate varies according to the amount required to achieve
either the outlet S02 concentration permitted emission limit or the percent S02
removal efficiency, whichever is more stringent. The spray dryer outlet
temperature is typically about 255°F. The system is designed for automatic
control of the lime feed rate and the dilution water. However, the lime feed
control loop is operated manually at this time. The lime slurry ratio is
adjusted by the operator to maintain the desired S02 emission levels.
The dry solids and flyash are then collected in a three-field ESP designed
by Wheelabrator Air Pollution Control Systems. The ESP is cleaned according to
various rapping cycle programs. The total time required to complete a cleaning
cycle is about 10 to 12 minutes. A schematic illustrating the process data
sensor locations in the spray dryer system and ESP is shown in Figure 4-3.
-------
Furnace
Draft
Secondary
Air
Flow
Pressure
Primary Air
Flow
Temperature
Pressure
Superheater
Outlet
Temperature
Pressure
d
Unit #2
Steam
»
Flow
Temperature
Pressure
Economizer
Outlet
Temperature
Pressure
Oxygen
Steam
From Unit #1
Generator
Figure 4-2. Process Data Sensor Locations for the Furnace System
-------
Field 1
Secondary
Voltage
Secondary
Voltage
r
"\
Field
1
^+
r
4
Field
2
•*. ^*
I
Field
3
•^ ^-
Field 3
Secondary
Voltage
ESP Outlet
v Temperature
\ /
ESP
ESP
Outlet
SO,
ID Fan
Inlet
Pressure
10 Fan
Spray Dryer
Inlet
Temperature
... . . Dilution
.Atomizing Water
Air Flow
\
Spray Dryer
Inlet
SO,, CO
\
Spray
Dryer
Flow
City
Water-
Ume
L
Total
Slurry
Flow
Slaker
Ume Slurry
Concentration
Slurry
Tank
\/
\
Spray Dryer
Outlet
Temperature
Spray Dryer
Figure 4-3. Process Data Sensor Locations for the ESP and Spray Dryer
System at the Millbury Resource Recovery Facility
4-5
-------
4.5 ASH HANDLING
The ash handling system removes ash from the grate discharges, superheater,
generator and economizer tube banks, spray dryer, and ESP. The water-quenched
bottom ash from the combined grates and the superheater, generator, and
economizer ash are removed by vibrating conveyors to an enclosed ash handling
area. ESP and spray dryer ash are drag-conveyed and mixed with the bottom ash
mixture. The combined ash is then screened to remove large materials and
landfilled. Any oversize materials are separated and are landfilled. Ferrous
materials are reclaimed and sold.
4-6
-------
5-0 MONITORING SYSTEM DESCRIPTIONS
Four independent monitoring systems were utilized during this project: two
Millbury plant CEMS's consisting of separate inlet and outlet analyzers, and two
GEMS's temporarily installed by Entropy for the monitoring of HC1 at the SDA
inlet and ESP outlet. This section contains descriptions of the analyzers used
and their corresponding data acquisition systems. Figures 5~1 and 5~2 depict the
two sampling locations.
5.1 THERMO ENVIRONMENTAL MODEL 15 HC1 ANALYZER/MODEL 200 DILUTION SYSTEM
The Thermo Environmental (TECO) monitoring system is comprised of a Model 15
HC1 analyzer (operated on the 0-50 ppm analyzer range), a Model 200 probe control
unit, and a dilution probe (40:1 dilution ratio). The resultant operating range
of the measurement system was 0-2000 ppm HC1 (wet basis).
The TECO Model 15 Gas Filter Correlation (GFC) HC1 analyzer is an
analytical instrument for continuous, real time measurement of HC1 on a wet
basis.
GFC spectroscopy is based upon comparison of the absorption of a selected
wavelength within the infrared (IR) absorption spectrum by the measured gas to
that of other gases also present in the sample being analyzed. The technique is
implemented by using a high concentration sample of the measured gas (i.e., HC1)
as a filter for the IR radiation transmitted through the analyzer. The analyzer
contains a correlation wheel that consists of two hemispherical cells, one filled
with HC1 and the other with N2. Integral with the correlation wheel is the
chopper pattern necessary to produce the high frequency chop required by the IR
detector.
Radiation from an IR source is chopped and then passed through the gas
filter, alternating between HC1 and N2 as the filter wheel rotates. The
radiation then passes through a narrow bandpass interference filter and enters a
multiple optical pass cell where it is absorbed by the sample gas. The IR
radiation that is not absorbed then exits the sample cell and is measured by the
IR detector.
The HC1 gas filter produces a reference beam that cannot be further
attenuated by HC1 in the sample cell. The N2 side of the filter wheel is
transparent to the IR radiation and therefore produces a measure beam that can be
absorbed by the HC1 in the cell. The chopped detector signal is modulated by the
alternation between the two gas filters with an amplitude related to the
5-1
-------
8-9' DIA.
ANARAD GEMS
SAMPLING PORT
TEOO HO
SAMPLWG PROBE
REFERENCE
METHOD
SAMPLING PORT
SECTION N-N
-19'
f ?
N
FROM
AIR
HEATER
TO
SDA
CONTAINMENT
BUILDING
N
Figure 5-1. Spray Dryer Inlet Sampling Location.
3529 10/88
5-2
-------
OPACITY
TRANSMISSOMETER
ANARAD OEMS
SAMPLING PORT
96"
U U
OPACITY
RETROREFLECTOR
96*
i
10"
BRAN & LUEBBE
PROBE
If/f
J '
REFERENCE
METHOD
SAMPLING PORT
T
SECTION N-N
FROM ESP
192"
48
. N
I
o o o o o
I
N
TO ID. FAN
Figure 5-2. ESP Outlet Sampling Location.
5-3
3529 10/88
-------
concentration of HC1 in the sample cell. Other gases do not cause modulation of
the detector signal because they absorb the reference and measure beams equally.
Thus, the GFC system responds specifically to HC1. Also, the^sensitivity of the
analyzer is increased by using multiple pass optics in the sample cell, which
lead to a large path length, and thus an improved sensitivity, in a small
physical space. This allows full scale sensitivity down to 1 ppm.
Because IR absorption is a nonlinear measurement technique, the instrument
electronics convert the basic analyzer signal into a linear output. The exact
calibration curve is stored in the computer's memory and is used to linearize
the instrument output over all the ranges. The microcomputer is used to process
signals from both a pressure and temperature transducer to make corrections to
the instrument output, resulting in HC1 concentration measurements that are
unaffected by changes in the temperature or pressure of the sample gas.
The analyzer has 10 selectable operating ranges from 0-5 ppm to 0-5000 ppm
HC1. The vendor claims that the detection limit for this instrument is 0.1 ppm.
The Model 200 dilution system is comprised of the following components:
- In-situ dilution probe with sample orifice,
- Transport tubing, and
- M200 stack probe control unit.
The dilution probe is designed to extract a small amount of sample
continuously through a fine filter. The sample flow rate is precisely controlled
to within 2% by a glass critical orifice of low coefficient of expansion. By
reducing the pressure after the fine filter with a precision aspirator to create
a vacuum of 0.46 bar in the volume downstream of the critical orifice, a constant
flow of flue gas sample is drawn through the orifice, thoroughly mixed with the
aspirator air, and then transported through the sample line to the appropriate
analyzer.
The sampling system is designed to permit stepwise dilution ratios of 12:1
to 350:1 within the probe by a single selected orifice.
Calibrations are performed by introducing calibration gas through a Teflon
transport line to a point within the probe upstream of the first fine filter in
the probe dilution orifice. In this way, the calibration gas follows all of the
sample conditioning steps taken by the flue gas sample. The lines transporting
flue gas sample and calibration gas are Teflon, and the dilution air and vacuum
lines are polyethylene.
The dilution air and calibration gas flow controls are contained within the
M200 control unit.
-------
5.2 BRAN & LUEBBE ECOMETER HC1 MONITORING SYSTEM
A Bran and Luebbe Ecometer HC1 monitoring system was installed at the ESP
outlet sampling location. The Ecometer was operated on a range of 0-60 ppm HC1.
The Ecometer operating principle, based on potentiometric measurement uBing
a Cl* ion-selective electrode, is as follows: A gas sampling system employing a
stainless steel probe to extract a gas sample from the stack, filters and
transports the stack gas to the Ecometer. A glass fiber filter is installed at
the outlet of the probe to filter particulate matter. Both the probe and the
filter are thermostatically heated. A flexible heat-traced Teflon line and
special diaphragm pump are employed to transport the gas sample from the stack to
the analyzer at a flow rate of approximately 1 liter/minute. The gas sample is
kept at approximately 200°C prior to absorption to prevent condensation of water
vapor in the sample lines, resulting in a loss of HC1.
The flue gas sample is chemically treated, resulting in the absorption of
HC1 and the formation of Cl" ions. The chemical solution used to absorb HC1
also buffers the pH and ionic strength of the absorbed solution and destroys
possible undesirable interferences. The absorbing solution containing the Cl"
ions is degassed and conveyed to the ion-selective electrode to be quantified.
After necessary amplification and conversion, a voltage signal proportional to
the amount of Cl" present is produced.
The Ecometer performs an internal calibration routine either automatically
or by manual actuation. During the calibration routine, flue gas sampling is
stopped and two calibration solutions are fed to the ion-selective electrode in
sequence. The calibration results are stored in an internal microcomputer, and
used for.calculation of the subsequent stack gas measurement results. There are
no provisions in the Ecometer system for the introduction of HC1 cylinder gas.
The Ecometer measurement is made on a wet basis. The vendor claims the
accuracy of the Ecometer to be +_ 5JK of full scale and the system response time
to be less than 200 seconds.
The output of the Ecometer was fed to Entropy's data acquisition system
(DAS) where the signal was converted to a concentration value. The DAS
displayed the concentration value continuously on the system's monitor, and
stored the one-minute averages on magnetic media. The DAS was programmed to
provide 6-minute and 1-hour averages of the one-minute values during the test
program.
5-5
-------
5.3 DATA ACQUISITION SYSTEM (IBM PORTABLE PC)
The data acquisition system (DAS) that was used to record the HC1
measurement data was developed by Entropy and uses an IBM Portable Personal
Computer with a 10 MB hard disk and an internal 12-bit analog-to-digital
converter with a 16 channel multiplexer. Surge suppressors and a back-up power
supply were provided to minimize data loss in the event of electrical
disturbances. In addition to providing an instantaneous display of analyzer
responses, the DAS averaged the data and documented the TECO calibrations. The
test results and calibrations were stored on the hard disk and printed on an
Epson dot matrix printer.
5.4 THERMO ENVIRONMENTAL INSTRUMENTS, INC. (FORMERLY TECO) NOX ANALYZER
The TECO Model 44 NOX analyzer employs the chemiluminescent principle of NO
detection. This measurement principle is based on the chemical reaction of ozone
(0,) and nitric oxide (NO) which produces nitrogen dioxide (N02) molecules at an
elevated energy level. Upon return to the ground energy state, the N02 molecules
emit light. The light produced is proportional to the concentration of NO in the
gas stream. To measure NO concentrations, the effluent gas is mixed with ozone
in a reaction chamber. The light that results from this reaction passes through
a narrow-band optical filter and is detected by a photomultiplier in the
reaction chamber. The photomultiplier produces an output signal which is
linearly proportional to the NO concentration in the effluent gas.
The measurement of total NOX in the effluent (NO + N02) requires the
conversion of effluent N02 to NO. This conversion is accomplished by passing the
sample gas through a converter which is comprised of a thermally insulated,
resistance-heated stainless steel coil. The converter operates at a temperature
of 650°C at which N02 molecules in the effluent gas are reduced to NO molecules.
The output of the converter is connected to the reaction chamber, and the
resultant NO measurement represents the total oxides of nitrogen (NOX) in the
effluent.
5.5 THERMOX 02 ANALYZER
The Thermox Model WDG III 02 analyzer employs an electrochemical technique
to measure the oxygen concentration in the effluent gas. The detector element
consists of a closed-end zirconium oxide cell. Half of the cell is exposed to
ambient air (reference) and the other half is exposed to the effluent gas sample.
When the cell is heated red hot, it conducts an electrical current between porous
5-6
-------
platinum electrodes that consists of migrating oxygen ions. The ion migration
produces a voltage output that is logarithmically proportional to the difference
in oxygen concentration (partial pressures) between the reference side of the
cell (ambient air) and the measurement side of the cell (sample gas). This
voltage output is linearized and converted to a signal representing the oxygen
concentration in the effluent gas.
5.6 ANARAD AR-50C CO ANALYZER
The AR-50C CO is a non-dispersive infrared (NDIR) gas analyzer. The theory
of operation for this type of analyzer is based on the principle that CO has a
unique absorption line spectrum in the infrared region. The AR-50C optical unit
consists of an IR energy source, an optical chopper, sample and reference cells,
optical filters, and a detector.
The infrared light beam emitted by the source passes through the measurement
cell, which is filled with continuously flowing sample gas. The light beam is
partially absorbed or attenuated before reaching the detector assembly. The
detector senses the instantaneous IR radiation values alternately transmitted
through the sample gas and the neutral reference optical path. The detector
signal is a succession of alternate voltage pulses with amplitudes that reflect
the degree of attenuation along the two paths. Although the output voltage after
processing, filtering, and amplification is non-linear with respect to
concentration, the calibration curve is well-defined for each range. The non-
linear analog is scaled to meet the requirements of the AR-2000 A/D converter and
subsequent linearizer.
5.7 ANARAD AR-30C S02 ANALYZER
The AR-30C S02 is a non-dispersive ultraviolet gas analyzer. The principle
and design are identical to that of the AR-50C CO analyzer described above, with
the exception of an ultraviolet energy source replacing the infrared source.
5.8 THERMO ENVIRONMENTAL INSTRUMENTS (FORMERLY THERMO ELECTRON) MODEL 400
TRANSMISSOMETER
The Model 400 transmissometer system consists of the transmissometer and the
air-purging system. The transmissometer component consists of a transceiver unit
mounted on one side of the duct and a retroreflector unit mounted on the opposite
side. The transceiver unit contains a light source, a photodiode detector, and
the optical, mechanical, and electronic components used in monitor operation and
calibration.
5-7
-------
The transceiver uses a single lamp single detector system, employing both
internal and external choppers. The internal chopper modulates the measurement
beam to eliminate interference from ambient light. The external three-segmented
chopper produces alternating calibration and stack opacity measurements. Since
the external chopper is exposed to stack conditions, it automatically compensates
for dust accumulation on transceiver optics. The output signal from the
transceiver (double-pass, uncorrected transmittance) is transmitted to the
control unit.
The air purging system serves a threefold purpose: (1) it provides an air
window to keep exposed optical surfaces clean; (2) it protects the optical
surfaces from condensation of effluent moisture; and (3) it minimizes thermal
conduction from the stack to the instrument. Each transmissometer has one air-
purging system for the transceiver unit and one for the retroreflector unit; each
system has a blower providing filtered air.
5.9 THERMO ENVIRONMENTAL INSTRUMENTS MODEL 701 MULTI-SIGNAL TOTALIZER (COMBINER)
The Model 701 combiner receives transmittance signals from each
transmissometer and converts them to optical density. The optical density values
are averaged together, and then the average is adjusted according to the ratio of
the stack exit diameter to the duct widths. This stack exit optical density
value is converted to units of opacity. Fault lamps on the Model 701 control
panel indicate transmissometer fault conditions such as measurement lamp failure,
power failure, excessive dust on optical surfaces, and failure of the purge air
system. The Model 701 initiates the daily calibration of each transmissometer.
5.10 MILLBURY DATA ACQUISITION SYSTEM
The Millbury data acquisition system (DAS) utilizes Odessa Engineering
software, an AR-2000 (Apple) computer, a DSM 3260 DAS Interface and a Compaq 286
computer. The AR-2000 controls automatic calibrations, system blowbacks and
error detection It also performs A/D conversions on the analyzer outputs,
linearizes the signals when appropriate, and corrects for zero and calibration
drift. The corrected data are sent to the DSM 3260, which calculates 6-minute
averages for all gases in concentration units. The DSM also converts pollutant
concentrations to Ib/MBtu values. The Compaq, located in the control room,
computes additional averages, stores data, and writes reports. The report
generating capabilities include 6-minute, daily, and monthly emission and/or
calibration summary reports. The units and format can be chosen each time a
printout or disk file is desired.
5-8
-------
APPENDIX A.
"Test Request"
-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Research Triangle Park. North Carolina 2771 1
3 MAR 1933
MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Test Request - Continuous Monitoring of Emissions
From Two Municipal Waste Combustors (MWC)
FROM: James U. Crowder,
Industrial Studies Branch, ESD (MD-13)
TO: George W. Walsh, Chief
Emission Measurement Branch, TSD (MD-14)
This memorandum is to request that the Emission Measurement Branch
(EMB) conduct continuous emission monitoring (CEM) tests at two MWC
facilities. The result of the test program should be the collection of
30 days of CEM data and relevant process operation data at each facility.
These data will be analyzed to determine emissions and emission control
variabilities in order to select the appropriate averaging times for any
proposed standards.
The two facilities are state-of-the-art, mass burn MWC facilities with
current best available control technology (BACT) installed. The first
facility is the Millbury Resource Recovery Facility in Millbury,
Massachusetts. The second facility is the Marion County Solid
Waste-to-Energy Facility in Brooks, Oregon.
Detailed information on the facilities to be tested and the required
test program is presented below. Any questions concerning this request
should be addressed to Mike Johnston.
I. RELATIONSHIP OF TEST DATA TO DEVELOPMENT OF STANDARDS
On July 7, 1987, the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued
an advance notice of proposed rulemaking for MWC's. This notice announced
the EPA's intent to propose standards of performance for new or modified
MWC's under Section lll(b) of the Clean Air Act and to issue existing source
guidelines under Section lll(d). These guidelines will be used by the
States in developing emission standards for existing MWC's.
On June 26, 1987, the Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
(OAQPS) Issued operational guidance to the EPA Regions on the control of new
-------
MWC's for the purpose of determining 8ACT under new source review (NSR) and
prevention of significant deterioration (PSD) permitting activities. This
guidance requires permitting authorities to consider a dry scrubber and a
fabric filter or electrostatic precipitator as BACT for sulfur dioxide (SO.)
and particulate matter and combustion control as BACT for carbon monoxide
(CO). Acid gas scrubbing, coupled with good particulate control, Is also
effective in controlling the emissions of hydrogen chloride (HC1), toxic
organics (dioxins/furans), and metal pollutants. ^
The CEM tests requested will provide the long-term data needed to
establish the level and averaging period for emission standards and
guidelines for SO-, HC1, CO, and opacity, as appropriate, in any proposed
regulations.
II. PROCESS DESCRIPTION
Both facilities selected for inclusion in this CEM program are large
mass burn MWC's. Mass burn MWC's were selected for testing because of the
potential for larger variations 1n fuel composition, which leads to probable
larger variations in uncontrolled emission loadings to the control devices,
and larger variations in combustion conditions. A refuse derived fuel (RDF)
fired facility was not selected because of the probability that the refuse
processing would homogenize the fuel to some extent.
Both facilities combust municipal solid waste received from residential
and commercial sources. On a general basis, no MSW processing is performed
at either facility. However, a waste screening program is in place at the
Marion County facility to reject building wastes that cause high SO.
loadings to the spray dryer system. Further descriptions of the facilities
are presented below.
Millbury Resource Recovery Facility
The Millbury facility consists of two identical furnace, boiler, and
flue gas treatment systems that exhaust into one common stack. The process
schematic is shown in Figure 1. Each unit is designed to process
750 tons/day of municipal solid waste. The refuse is charged to a Babcock
and Wilcox water wall furnace and boiler unit that is equipped with a Von
Roll reciprocating, inclined grate.
The furnace flue gases pass up through the water wall section of the
furnace and then into superheater, boiler, and economizer heat transfer
units. The recovered steam is used to generate electricity in a steam
turbine-generator set. The boiler is rated to produce about 190,000 Ib/hr
of superheated steam at 850 psig and 825 F. The turbine generator that
serves both units is rated at 40 megawatts.
Each furnace 1s equipped with a spray dryer-electrostatic precipitator
(ESP) control system designed by Wheelabrator Air Pollution Control Systems.
Slaked lime, along with metered dilution water for temperature control, Is
injected into the dryer vessel where the slurry droplets are evaporated and
-------
co.o2.so2
A
ELECTROSTATIC
PRECIPrTATOR
Rani CEMS
S02.NOX.
O2. OPACITY
TO GRIZZLY
AND TRUCKS
STACK
Figure 1. Process Schematic, Ml11 bury Resource Recovery Facility
-------
react with acid gases. The dry solids and flyash are collected in a
three-field ESP. The flue gases are then exhausted to the common stack
serving both units.
Each of the two units is currently equipped with CEM equipment. The
location of these analyzers is also shown in Figure 1. Analyzers to Measure
CO, SOp, and oxygen (0?) are installed at the inlet to the spray dryer, in
addition, a separate 0; analyzer 1s installed at the economizer outlet for
combustion control. Analyzers are also installed at the ESP outlet\o
measure S02, nitrogen oxide (NOX), 02, and opacity.
* '
Data collection at each of the CEM locations is handled by a
microcomputer system. A central data management computer compiles the data
generated by the remote computers and generates reports. Data are presented
on a six-minute average basis for opacity, CO, SO,, and NO emissions, and
SOp removal efficiency. Data are stored on disk for subsequent reports or
analyses.
The furnace and flue gas treatment systems are controlled by a Bailey
NET 90 distributed control system. All data from the system sensors are
monitored by the computer system and are available for logging. Custom
trend logs can be configured to either log to a printer or transmit to
another computer.
Marion County Solid Waste-to-Enerqy Facility
The Marion County facility consists of two identical furnace, boiler,
and flue gas treatment systems that exhaust into separate flues in a common
stack shell. The process schematic is shown in Figure 2. Each unit is
designed to process 275 tons/day of municipal solid waste. The refuse is
charged to a membrane water wall furnace which is followed by a boiler
composed of a convection section, a superheater, and an economizer. The
stoker is a Martin GmbH inclined, reverse-reciprocating grate. The
recovered energy as steam is used to generate electricity for sale. Each
boiler is rated to produce 66,000 Ib/hr of superheated steam 655 psig and
700 f. The turbine generator set that serves both boilers is rated at
13.1 megawatts.
Each furnace is equipped with a spray dryer fabric filter control
system designed by Teller/American Air Filter. The flue gases first pass
through an inertial separator to remove large particulates. After the
cyclone, calcined lime slurry is injected into the flue gas. The current
configuration of the system uses a dilute slurry for acid gas neutralization
and temperature control at the absorber exit. Planned modifications will
Incorporate the use of a high density slurry for reagent feed and a separate
dilution water stream for temperature control. The slurry and water will be
mixed In-line just prior to injection in the air-atomized nozzles. The
spray dryer is followed by a venturi section for injection of Tesisorb,
-------
AcMOa F««d
CK_I
10. FMI Slack
PH
OPACITY
U1
Ptert CEMS
Figure 2. Process Schematic, Marlon County SUE Facility
-------
which 1s used as a filtration aide. The dry solids and flyash are removed
in a six-compartment baghouse with a gross air/cloth ratio of 1.69:1. The
design S02 and HC1 removal efficiencies are 70 and 90 percent, respectively.
The CEM instrument systems that are presently installed are an 0.
analyzer at the economizer exit and an opacity analyzer at the stack. These
analyzers are shown in Figure 2.
••%
Ogden Systems, Inc., is currently evaluating a TECO FTIR instrument
which is monitoring the flue gas composition at the ID fan exhaust. This
system is reported to be operating well, but its availability for a CEM
program has not been determined. Oxygen and opacity are currently recorded
on strip charts.
The furnace 1s controlled by a proprietary Martin GmbH analog
controller. This unit balances refuse feed rates, stoker rates, and air
distribution and .flow. The flue gas treatment system is controlled by
analog controllers.
As a result of the planned EPA performance tests scheduled for this
spring, analog interface connections will be available for data logging, but
computer data logging equipment is not available as part of the plant
equipment.
III. DESCRIPTION OF THE TEST PROGRAM
The CEM test programs to be performed at the Mi 11 bury Resource Recovery
facility and the Marion County SWE facility are designed to provide the
long-term data necessary to determine the appropriate levels and averaging
periods for pollutants for which direct emission monitoring for compliance
may be required, and to select the appropriate surrogates for pollutants,
such as dioxins/furans or HC1, that cannot practically be continuously
monitored at this time.
The test programs involve the collection of long-term CEM data and
associated process operation information. The pollutants and other flue
gases to be monitored by CEM and the process data that needs to be logged
are presented in Tables 1 and 2 for Millbury and Marion County,
respectively.
Continuous monitoring of the acid gases S0~ and HC1 simultaneously at
the control system inlet and outlet will provide data to assess long-term
achievable SO- and HC1 removal efficiencies across the systems and the
ultimate emissions. These data will be used to determine the achievable
emission levels and averaging periods for any proposed standard.
Comparative analysis of the SO- and HC1 removal efficiency data will provide
Information to determine if SO- removal is a consistent indicator of HC1
removal performance.
-------
TABLE 1. CONTINUOUS MONITORING SCHEDULE
MILLBURY RESOURCE RECOVERY FACILITY
MILLBURY, MASSACHUSETTS
Monitorina Location
Parameter
Spray Drver Inlet
HC1
ESP Outlet
Process Data
co
co
HC1
Opacity3
Steam Load
Total Air Flow
Boiler Master Output
Grate Master Output
Natural Gas Flow
Primary Air Pressure
Secondary Air Pressure
Undergrate Air Temperature
Oxygen
Superheater Outlet Temperature
Economizer Outlet Temperature
Spray Dryer Inlet Pressure
ESP Outlet Pressure
Spray Dryer Inlet Temperature
Spray Dryer Outlet Temperature
Lime Slurry Concentration
Dilution Water Flow
Total Slurry Flow
ESP Outlet Temperature
Field 1 Secondary Voltage
Field 2 Secondary Voltage
Field 3 Secondary Voltage
a
Plant CEM Instruments.
-------
8
TABLE 2. CONTINUOUS MONITORING SCHEDULE
MARION COUNTY SWE FACILITY
BROOKS, OREGON
Monitoring Local1on
Parameter
Sorav Drver Inlet
Fabric Filter Outlet
Process Data
S0£
HC1
°2
CO
co2
so2
°2
co2
HC1
Opacity3
Steam Load
Combustion A1r Flow
Combustion Air Temperature
Overfire Air Pressure
Front
Upper Rear
Lower Rear
Oxygen Concentration
Quench Reactor Inlet Pressure
Quench Reactor Outlet Pressure
Quench Reactor Inlet Temperature
Quench Reactor Outlet Temperature
Quench Reactor Air Flow
Dry Venturi Differential Pressure
Fabric Filter Inlet Temperature
Fabric Filter Oulet Temperature
Fabric Filter Differential Pressure
L1me Slurry Concentration
Dilution Water Flowb
Total Slurry Flow
Temperatures
Middle of Furnace, 1st Pass
Top of Furnace, 1st Pass
Superheater Flue Gas Outlet
Economizer Flue Gas Outlet
Plant CEM instrument.
'Process monitoring equipment not specified at this time.
-------
The 0? and carbon dioxide (C0?) CEM measurements are necessary to
normalize the pollutant measurements to a standard basis (12 percent COg
and/or 7 percent 02). ,
Measurement of CO will provide data to establish long-term achievable
levels and trends in CO emissions. In addition, recent NSR permits for new
MWC's have specified combustion efficiency as a surrogate measure of good
combustion. The CO and C02 data collected in this program will be used to
compute combustion efficiency for comparative purposes.
Opacity measurements at the* c'ontrol system outlet may be used to
develop an opacity limitation and an appropriate averaging time.
In addition to the variables that have been specified for continuous
flue gas measurements, various operations parameters have been specified for
recording. These data are normally-recorded process control measurements
that can provide .surrogate information concerning the proper operation of
the combustor and the emission control system. Steam flow has been
specified as the key indicator of process rate since there are no direct
measures of refuse feed rate. Total air flow and key furnace temperatures
are other indicators of typical furnace operations. Finally, various
control device operating variables, such as temperatures, reagent flow
rates, and fabric filter pressure drops/ESP voltages are specified to
monitor proper operation of the spray dryer/fabric filter or ESP system.
The primary importance of these operating data in this program will be
to document that the units were operating typically during the test period.
They can also be used to explain any periods of atypical emissions.
Analyses of these data may provide additional surrogate measures of good
combustion or good control equipment operation.
The CEM and process monitoring data are required for a period of 30
days at each facility. For the purpose of this program, a day is defined as
a clock 24-hour period where there are at least 18 valid 1-hour averages. A
1-hour average can be calculated if 75 percent of the data available during
the hour were collected. It is preferred that 30 days of valid data be
available for each parameter. However, it is possible that instrument
problems could prevent achieving this data requirement for HC1 removal
efficiency. Sampling should continue for up to 60 days in an attempt to
collect 30 days of data.
Instrument outages during the 30-day period may occur. However, it is
preferred that the data be as continuous as possible for ease in statistical
analysis.
The CEM guidelines given at 40 CFR 60.13(h) should be the basis for
minimum data availability. For opacity, 24 equally spaced readings make up
one 6-minute average. For other CEM variables, at least one instantaneous
reading every 15 minutes is required. Sampling intervals more frequent than
15 minutes will improve the data.
-------
10
The CEM data should be reported for each parameter measured and the raw
data should be used to calculate normalized pollutant concentrations and
emission factors (lb/10 Btu). The F-factor equations given in 40 CFR 60
Subpart Da should be used. Values for refuse F-factors are provided 1n
EPA-450/2-78-042a. All raw data and calculated results should be stored on
disk or tape files in a compatible format for exchange with ISB and Radiin
for data analysis.
•»
Since this data may be used to establish a standard, the data quality
must be comparable to the quality required for compliance demonstration
using CEM's. The QA/QC requirements of 40 CFR 60 Appendix F should be
followed at a minimum.
At a minimum, an accuracy audit test is required at the beginning and
end of the CEM test period. These relative accuracy tests may be a relative
accuracy test audit (RATA) or a cylinder gas audit (CGA). The frequency of
these audits should be increased to weekly if the accuracy audit results of
the CEM's show that it could be reasonably expected to exceed the control
limits occasionally. The data rejection criteria for out-of-control
operation should be used for this program. The quality control
documentation required by Appendix F should be generally followed.
Details regarding the test programs at the separate facilities are
presented below.
Hillburv
Either Unit 1 or 2 may be tested during this program.
This facility already has a CEM system installed for all the requested
flue gas components except CO- and HC1. Measurement of C0? at either the
spray dryer inlet or the ESP outlet will be sufficient to permit conversion
of (L-normalized data to a ^-normalized format using F factors. The HC1
analyzers will be the responsibility of the test contractor.
The facility already has a data management system in operation at
Mi 11 bury. The data logged by that system is stored on disk files and can be
made available to the test contractor. Data points are averaged every
6 minutes. Various report formats are available for data listings.
The requested process data can be logged by the plant process control
computer. Logs can be printed (or transmitted to a computer for logging)
every shift or every day.
Process data readings should be recorded at 1-hour intervals.
Stack Sampling Technical Information - A Collection of Monographs and
Papers. Vol 1. October 1978. p. 41.
-------
11
Marion County
Unit 1 should be tested during the CEM program because that unit will
be the only one that Is equipped with process data logging equipment.
There is no permanently installed CEM equipment except for an opacity
analyzer in the stack and an 0? analyzer that is used for process control.
The majority of the CEM equipment must be provided by the test contractor.
Ogden Projects Inc. 1s operating a prototype FTIR analyzer at the ID
fan outlet on Unit 1. However, Jt Is uncertain as to whether or not that
instrument will be available during the CEM test period and if acceptable
relative accuracy results will be achieved. In any case, it would be
advantageous to plan to have a duplicate system at that location for the CEM
test.
Interface equipment for hooking up process data logging equipment will
be available in the plant control room.
IV. TEST PROGRAM COORDINATION
A final organization structure for this project cannot be established
at this time. However, based on previous work at Millbury and Marion County
the following general structure is proposed for each location.
Millburv
Since the CEM and data systems that will be used are part of the
facility and the monitoring results must be reported to the Massachusetts
DEQE, the primary responsibility for operation and maintenance should remain
with Wheelabrator. The test contractor should overview the operation,
record the quality control data for drift, and perform the required accuracy
audits. The field test contractor will also be responsible for obtaining a
copy of the CEM data on disk media at appropriate intervals.
The field test contractor will operate the HC1 analyzer system and log
the concentration results at time intervals compatible with the other CEM
data.
Radian will provide a proposed final format for the compiled data set
for statistical analysis. With respect to the field test, Radian will
assist the facility and the test contractor in specifying and configuring
trend logs for the process data. Radian will also assist the test
contractor in setting up a system to capture the process data from the
NET 90 system.
Due to the need for collecting data of known quality, test contractor
personnel should be on site at least for the day shift on weekdays. This
amount of time will be required to assemble and review data, compile quality
control charts, and maintain logs, in addition to operating the HC1 CEM
system.
-------
APPENDIX B.
Daily Data Summaries
-------
NXLLBUIQr RESOURCE RBCOVKKf FACILITY - DftZBt 7-19-88
tally tat* 8n
TIME
1:00
2:00
3:00
4:00
5:00
6:00
7:00
8:00
9:00
10:00
11:00
12:00
13:00
14:00
15:00
16:00
17:00
18:00
19:00
20:00
21:00
22:00
23:00
24:00
tally
Mean:
Valid
Hours:
Inlet
ppeS02
128.9
106.4
117.2
118.6
137.0
151.9
162.0
179.8
170.5
381.6
130.4
61.9
109.5
80.6
146.0
146.4
146.8
2O4.6
173.1
163.4
145.9
263.3
137.9
159.6
155.1
24
Inlet
%02
9.2
9.0
8.8
8.9
8.7
8.8
8.5
8.6
10.1
9.6
8.9
9.7
9.7
10.3
9.8
9.2
9.6
9.3
8.4
8.8
10.4
9.6
9.6
9.1
9.3
24
Inlet
ppa CO )
26.2
26.2
25.6
25.7
25.3
25.0
24.9
24.8
27.8
30.1
30.5
31.6
30.6
31.4
30.5
29.8
29.7
27.5
25.6
23.8
21.5
22.4
22.5
22.2
26.7
24
Inlet
PP» BC1 i
541.1
452.0
588.0
463.7
450.3
534.2
604.6
1290.7
721.0
442.6
401.7
425.3
440.2
380.0
398.3
407.9
357.4
378.0
532.8
630.7
593.2
525.4
21
Outlet
{• 802
32.2
12.3
14.5
11.3
13.2
17.3
20.4
53.5
30.6
74.4
17.0
5.3
11.1
6.7
18.9
13.5
10.6
18.8
14.8
13.7
16.5
43.7
23.3
32.2
21.9
24
Outlet
%02
10.4
10.2
10.1
10.2
10.0
10.0
9.8
9.9
11.2
10.6
10.2
10.8
10.8
11.3
10.8
10.3
10.1
9.8
9.1
9.5
9.9
10.0
10.1
9.7
10.2
24
Outlet
Pf» MOX p
160.6
167.0
161.2
171.6
175.1
178.8
178.5
156.5
127.0
155.7
186.0
157.4
159.6
149.9
162.1
168.6
114.8
125.6
135.9
127.7
118.2
123.4
122.1
120.8
150.2
24
Outlet Opacity
{•BC1
3.3
1.4
1.1
0.9
0.8
0.9
1.0
10.3
3.7
0.6
0.4
0.5
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.6
0.7
1.8
1.4
21
*
1.9
1.9
1.8
1.8
1.8
2.0
1.7
1.5
1.6
1.5
1.6
1.6
1.4
1.7
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.4
1.3
1.5
1.5
1.9 '
2.1
3.2
1.7
24
-------
MXLLBUKX RESOURCE HBOOVKR3f FACILITX - UAH I 7-15-88
Corrected Data Suanuy
Inlet Outlet % 8O2 Inlet Outlet % BC1 Inlet Outlet
ppm OO2 pj» BO2 Reeoval ppm HC1 pp> HC1 Reeovtl ppa CO ppe Kac
TUB 07% O2
llOO
2:00
3:00
4lOO
5:00
6:00
7:00
8sOO
9:00
10:00
11:00
12:00
13:00
14:00
15:00
16:00
17:00
16:00
19:00
20:00
21:00
22:00
23:00
24:00
24-hour
HMD:
Valid
Boon:
153.1
124.3
134.6
137.4
156.1
174.5
181.6
203.2
219.4
469.4
151.0
76.8
135.9
105.7
182.8
173.9
180.6
245.2
192.5
187.7
193.1
323.9
169.6
188.0
185.9
24
07% 02 Efficiency
42.6
16.0
18.7
14.7
16.8
22.1
25.5
67.6
43.8
100.4
22.1
7.3
15.3
9.7
26.0
17.7
13.6
23.5
17.4
16.7
20.9
55.7
30.0
40.0
28.5
24
72.2
87.1
86.1
89.3
89.2
87.4
85.9
66.7
80.0
78.6
85.4
90.5
88.8
90.8
85.8
89.8
92.4
90.4
90.9
91.1
89.2
82.8
82.3
78.7
as. s
24
•7% O2 9,7% O2 Efficiency 07% 02
747.5
613.9
785.4
624.6
596.6
713.6
788.1
1696.0
1079.0
638.7
612.5
619.3
608.1
543.5
555.0
527.4
477.4
581.9
762.1
902.1
812.5
727.9
21
5.3
2.2
1.7
1.4
1.2
1.4
1.5
15.9
6.5
1.0
0.7
0.8
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.4
. 0.5
0.9
1.1
2.7
2.3
21
99.3
99.6
99.8
99.8
99.8
99.8
99.8
99.1
99.4
99.8
99.9
99.9
99.9
99.9
99.9
99.9
99.9
99.9
99.9
99.9
99.7
99.8
21
31.1
30.6
29.4
29.8
28.8
28.7
27.9
28.0
35.8
37.0
35.3
39.2
38.0
41.2
38.2
35.4
36.5
33.0
28.5
27.3
28.5
27.6
27.7
26.2
32.1
24
•7% 02
212.6
216.9
207.5
222.9
223.3
228.0
223.5
197.8
182.0
210.1
241.6
216.6
219.6
217.0
223.1
221.1
147.8
157.3
160.1
155.7
149.4
157.4
157.1
149.9
193.8
24
CoHMate/Procees lot**: Five 8D& ooxslee in eerviae. (Oat of mix)
-------
MXLLBDIOr RB8CUBCB RECOVER! FACXLITX - OMB: 7-16-88
Daily Data
Inlet Inlet Inlet
Inlet Outlet Outlet
TIME ppa 8O2 %O2 ppm CO ppe HC1 p
1:00
2:00
3:00
4:00
5:00
6:00
7:00
8:00
9:00
10:00
11:00
12:00
13:00
14:00
15:00
16:00
17:00
18:00
19:00
20:00
21:00
22:00
23:00
24:00
Daily
Mean:
Valid
Boors:
137.1
157.6
132.7
109.8
112.2
113.0
129.9
96.9
154.4
194.4
177.5
173.6
219.5
120.3
172.1
175.8
202.9
292.8
330.2
352.5
152.2
141.4
112.7
143.7
171.1
24
9.2
8.8
9.3
9.9
9.4
9.4
8.9
8.9
9.3
9.8
9.8
9.4
9.7
9.3
9.8
9.1
8.9
9.5
8.9
9.2
10.8
9.8
10.1
9.6
9.5
24
22.1
21.7
21.2
22.0
22.0
22.4
22.3
22.4
25.4
27.9
27.7
28.4
28.4
29.2
28.7
28.8
28.6
28.7
29.2
28.8
28.4
29.4
28.9
30.5
26.4
24
503.1
451.2
392.6
421.7
390.0
399.5
479.9
468.6
527.8
771.8
512.2
483.7
394.3
567.6
504.1
508.0
506.6
498.6
489.8
617.3
487.4
494.1
21
Outlet Outlet Opacity
DB SOS fcrtQ DBB *^** DOM BCl. %
IP" •«*•» ^**» j^^™ HUM mfm^m ••••* »
22.6
29.0
23.9
17.1
16.5
17.6
22.1
14.4
32.4
47.8
3T.7
32.6
47.3
19.7
32.1
35.2
43.6
60.8
71.9
81.3
29.2
20.2
17.9
18.1
33.0
24
9.7
9.4
9.9
10.3
10.0
9.9
9.5
9.5
10.0
10.2
10.1
9,*
9.9
9.7
10.0
9.5
9.3
9.7
9.3
9.4
9.7
9.5
10.0
9.8
9.8
24
125.2
133.2
124.1
117.7
123.0
117.1
120.8
128.5
113.1
96.2
93.2
102.4
98.5
100.7
98.8
102.9
116.7
115.8
126.4
123.1
130.1
143.3
125.6
132.5
117.1
24
1.0
1.2
1.2
1.0
0.8
0.7
1.1
1.0
0.8
3.0
1.6
0.9
0.7
1.2
0.9
0.6
0.7
0.4
0.1
0.5
0.2
0.9
21
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.0
1.7
1.4
1.0
0.9
0.8
1.0
0.7
0.7
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
1.1
1.3
1.3
2.4
1.4
24
-------
MXLLBUItt RSSOURCB RBCOVEJCT FACILITY - DAS: 7-16-88
Corrected Data Suaeary
Inlet Outlet % 8O2 Inlet Outlet % HCI Inlet
ppa SOU ppa 8O2 Reaoval ppa HCI ppa BC1 Reaoval ppa 00 j
TIMS 07% O2 07% O2 Kfficlency
1:00
2:00
3:00
4iOO
5:00
6:00
7:00
6:00
9:00
10:00
11:00
12:00
13:00
14:00
15:00
16:00
17:00
16:00
19:00
20:00
21:00
22:00
23:00
24:00
24-hour
Avgi
Valid
Boor*:
162.9
181.0
199.0
138.7
135.6
136.6
150.5
112.2
185.0
243.4
222.3
209.8
272.4
144.2
215.5
207.1
235.0
357.0
382.5
418.8
209.5
177.1
145.0
176.8
207.4
24
28.0
35.1
30.2
22.4
21.0
22.2
26.9
17.6
41.3
62.1
48.5
40.8
59.8
24.4
40.9 *
42.9
52.2
75.5
86.2
98.3
36.2
24.6
22.8
22.7
41.0
24
82.8
80.6
81.0
83.8
84.5
83.7
82.1
84.4
77.7
74.5
78.2
80.5
78.1
83.0
81.0
79.3
77.8
78.9
77.5
76.5
82.7
86.1
84.3
87.2
81.1
24
07% 02 07% 02 IfficieDcy 07% O2
695.0
602.7
547.0
619.6
548.1
561.5
646.4
631.2
735.4
1123.8
745.8
679.8
569.0
764.5
714.7
684.2
699.8
797.9
713.2
923.8
697.1
700.0
21
1.5
1.8
1.8
1.6
1.2
1.1
1.6
1.5
1.2
4.8
2.5
1.4
1.1
1:8
1.4
0.9
1.0
0.6
0.1
0.8
0.3
1.4
21
99.8
99.7
99.7
99.7
99.8
99.8
99.7
99.6
99.8
99.6
99.7
99.8
99.8
99.8
99.8
99.9
99.9
99.9
100.0
99.9
100.0
99.8
21
26.3
24.9
25.4
27.8
26.6
27.1
25.8
25.9
30.4
34.9
34.7
34.3
35.2
35.0
35.9
33.9
33.4
35.0
33.6
34.2
39.1
36.8
37.2
37.5
32.1
24
Outlet
tpm WQx.
07% 02
155.4
161.0
156.8
154.3
156.9
148.0
147.3
156.7
144.2
125.0
120.0
128.2
124.5
125.0
126.0
125.5
139.8
143.7
151.5
151.2
161.5
174.7
160.2
165.9
146.0
24
Ccaaente/Pi ucea • Motees
-------
RBSOUBCB RBCOVBKX FMCZLm - DAIS: 7-17-68
Dally Data So
TDffi
1:00
2:00
3:00
4:00
5:00
6:00
7:00
8:00
9:00
10:00
11:00
12:00
13:00
14:00
15:00
16:00
17:00
18:00
19:00
20:00
21:00
22:00
23:00
24:00
Daily
Mean:
Valid
Hour*:
Inlet
pp> SO2
136.2
151.4
133.5
151.7
160.5
198.1
161.1
133.7
142.3
164.1
291.2
205.9
274.4
103.1
164.1
212.1
152.7
174.9
124.0
191.3
248.9
157.6
151.2
173.2
23
Inlet
%O2
8.9
8.9
9.3
9.6
9.6
9.2
9.4
11.1
11.0
9.7
10.1
9.5
10.0
10.3
9.3
9.7
10.1
10.1
10.4
10.0
9.7
10.1
9.2
9.8
23
Inlet
ppM CO |
30.0
28.9
28.8
29.0
29.2
28.4
28.1
27.3
28.2
28.8
29.3
29.7
29.3
29.1
29.2
29.5
28.8
28.5
28.7
28.5
28.5
28.0
28.9
28.8
23
Inlet
n»aci
472.8
465.8
650.1
753.1
697.1
788.7
604.3
681.3
886.6
541.8
531.1
679.2
746.5
568.3
613.2
784.5
841.7
566.0
553.5
509.0
618.0
572.3
483.3
531.6
630.8
24
Outlet
pp-802
14.5
20.8
22.4
38.1
28.3
42.3
29.0
30.1
22.0
23.4
59.0
42.8
48.7
16.0
43.3
50.6
28.7
36.0
22.6
44.3
55.0
26.2
31.4
33.7
23
Outlet
%02
9.2
9.3
9.6
9.8
9.8
9.5
9.7
10.9
10.7
10.1
10.3
9.9
10.2
10.5
9.7
10.0
10.4
10.3
10.6
10.3
10.0
10.3
9.5
10.0
23
Outlet
pp* BOX
144.8
142.6
138.8
133.3
126.6
135.3
135.7
119.9
123.2
132.3
117.9
135.0
139.9
132.2
140.6
137.8
132.6
» 127.4
132.0
156.9
161.7
139.7
154.2
136.5
23
Outlet Opacity
ppBBCl
0.1
0.1
0.4
3.2
1.7
2.1
1.2
1.0
4.3
3.3
1.6
2.3
2.9
2.1
1.4
5.0
4.2
2.1
2.1
1.7
4.0
3.6
2.0
2.8
2.3
24
*
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.4
1.4
1.5
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.1
1.0
0.8
0.8
0.9
0.8
0.9
0.9
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.9
2.5
2.9
3.3
1.4
24
-------
MILLBUJCr RK30UK3 RECOVER! 7ACHITT - DMS: 7-17-8B
Corrected Data So
Inlet Outlet
pp> 802 ppa S02 E
TIMS 87% O2
1:00
2:00
3:00
4:00
5:00
6:00
7:00
8:00
9:00
10:00
11:00
12:00
13:00
14:00
15:00
16:00
17:00
18:00
19:00
20:00
21:00
22:00
23:00
24:00
24-hour
Neon:
Valid
Boor*:
157.8
175.4
160.0
186.6
197.4
235.3
194.7
189.6
199.8
203.7
374.8
251.1
349.9
135.2
196.6
263.2
196.5
225.1
164.2
244.0
308.9
202.8
179.6
217.1
23
% 802
leaoval
•7% 02 Efficiency
17.2
24.9
27.6
47.7
35.4
51.6
36.0
41.8
30.0
30.1
77.4
54.1
63.3
21.4
53.7
64.5
38.0
47.2
30.5
58.1
70.1
34.4
38.3
43.2
23
89.1
85.8
82.8
74.4
82.0
78.1
81.5
77.9
85.0
85.2
79.4
78.5
81.9
84.2
72.7
75.5
80.7
79.0
81.4
76.2
77.3
83.1
78.7
80.4
23
Inlet Outlet
ppm BC1 ppB BC1 1
% BC1
taeeval
•7% 02 A7% 02 Efficiency
636.8
627.4
905.8
1077.2
997.1
1089.5
849.3
1462.2
884.5
766.4
1016.5
1058.4
842.7
935.0
1093.1
1214.7
847.0
828.3
783 .5
916.4
825.9
723.3
734.4
918.1
23
0.1
0.1
0.6
4.9
2.6
3.1
1.8
7.3
5.5
2.5
3.7
4.5
3.3
2.3
7.6
6.5
3.4
3.4
2.8
6.4
5.6
3.2
4.2
3.7
23
100.0
100.0
99.9
99.5
99.7
99.7
99.8
99.5
99.4
99.7
99.6
99.6
99.6
99.8
99.3
99.5
99.6
99.6
99.6
99.3
99.3
99.6
99.4
99.6
23
Inlet
PP" 00 '|
17% 02
34.8
33.5
34.5
35.7
35.9
33.7
34.0
38.7
39.6
35.7
37.7
36.2
37.4
38.2
35.0
36.6
37.1
36.7
38.0
36.3
35.4
36.0
34.3
36.1
23
Outlet
POBKQX
•7% 02
172.0
170.9
170.7
166.9
158.5
169.0
168.4
166.7
167.9
170.3
154.6
170.6
181.7
176.7
174.5
175.7
175.5
167.1
178.1
205.7
206.2
183.2
188.0
174.6
23
CceBenta/Proceaa Hateet
-------
KDUUBUKX RESOURCE RECOVERY FACILITY - DAIS: 7-16-08
Daily Data Sunary
Inlet Inlet Inlet
TIME ppa SO2 %O2 PC* 00 ]
1:00
2:00
3:00
4:00
5:00
6:00
7:00
8:00
9:00
10:00
11:00
12:00
13:00
14:00
15:00
16:00
17:00
18:00
19:00
20:00
21:00
22:00
23:00
24:00
13S.1
158.8
179.1
157.2
156.1
164.9
182.7
130.4
124.6
132.4
123.4
143.8
107.9
101.7
81.0
89.8
141.2
137.5
105.8
229.4
241.2
135.0
152.6
120.7
9.0
9.3
8.9
9.3
9.0
9.1
9.1
9.4
9.6
8.8
8.8
9.3
9.7
10.8
10.0
9.1
9.6
9.3
10.7
8.9
8.9
9.5
9.2
8.9
29.0
29.2
28.8
29.2
28.8
28.9
28.7
28.6
28.5
28.4
28.7
29.1
27.9
27.5
28.6
28.5
28.2
27.6
27.2
28.5
28.2
28.2
28.6
28.9
Inlet Outlet Outlet
ppB BCl ppe SO2 %O2 |
519.2
452.8
438.2
397.2
404.5
418.3
519.0
444.0
449.8
458.1
424.7
413.6
473.7
516.9
577.0
875.1
826.1
545.6
885.2
632.1
608.3
753.0
655.1
28.4
37.1
43.6
33.9
32.2
39.6
44.9
26.6
22.5
48.5
30.5
33.2
16.8
16.0
9.6
12.6
40.4
37.7
17.9
51.3
54.2
24.9
38.0
24.7
9.4
9.7
9.3
9.5
9.5
9.4
9.5
9.8
10.0
9.2
9.3
9.5
9.9
10.2
10.0
9.5
9.8
9.6
10.3
9.2
9.2
9.6
9.3
9.2
Outlet
ytm MOx p
154.1
155.8
158.2
153.2
156.6
155.6
149.6
156.2
137.6
144.6
148.0
144.9
143.1
146.4
145.4
146.2
141.4
148.0
136.8
142.1
150.6
151.9
144.6
153.5
Outlet Opeoity
{•BCl %
3.2
2.9
3.5
2.4
1.5
1.9
3.1
2.5
1.7
16.5
14.8
1.7
2.0
1.2
1.2
15.6
11.4
3.1
5.5
4.4
2.6
6.0
4.6
2.0
1.9
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.9
1.7
1.3
1.3
1.1
1.0
1.1
1.0
1.1
1.0
0.9
1.4
1.2
1.2
1.4
1.3
1.5
1.6
2.6
Daily
Mean: 143.0 9.3 28.5 551.6 31.9 9.6 148.5 4.9 1.5
Valid
Boura: 24 24 24 23 24 24 24 23 24
-------
MULBUHr RESOURCE RECOVER* PACILXTY - DUB: 7-18-88
Corrected Data Sunary
Inlet Outlet % SO2
ppm 802 pp> S02 awaval
TIME 07% 02
1:00
2:00
3>00
4lOO
5:00
6:00
7:00
8:00
9:00
10:00
11:00
12:00
13:00
14:00
15:00
16:00
17:00
18:00
19:00
20:00
21:00
22:00
23:00
24:00
24-toux
Maaa:
Valid
Boozsi
157.8
190.3
207.5
188.4
182.3
194.2
215.2
157.6
153.3
152.1
141.8
172.3
133.9
140.0
103.3
105.8
173.7
164.8
144.2
265.7
279.4
164.6
181.3
139.8
171.2
24
07% O2 Efficiency
34.3
46.0
52.2
41.3
39.3
47.9
54.7
33.3
28.7
57.6
36.5
40.5
21.2
20.8
12.2
15.4
50.6
46.4
23.5
60.9
64.4
30.6
45.5
29.3
38.9
24
78.2
75.8
74.8
78.1
78.5
75.4
74.6
78.9
81.3
62.1
74.2
76.5
84.1
85. 1
88.1
85.5
70.9
71.9
83.7
77.1
77.0
81.4
74.9
79.0
77.8
24
Inlet Outlet % HC1
ppm BC1 ppm HC1 Raeoval
Inlet Outlet
PC* CO ppm to*
•7% 02 «7% 02 Efficiency »7% O2
705.2
630.9
590.2
553.4
549.4
573.0
710.9
624.0
643.4
611.9
567.3
596.9
758.1
766.5
790.3
1251.7
1151.0
864.6
1192.3
851.4
862.4
1040.2
882.4
772.5
23
4.7
4.4
5.1
3.6
2.2
2.8
4.6
3.8
2.6
23.9
21.6
2.6
3.2
1.9
1.8
23.8
17.1
5.0
8.0
6.4
3.9
8.8
6.7
7.3
23
99.3
99.3
99.1
99.4
99.6
99.5
99.4
99.4
99.6
96.1
96.2
99.6
99.6
99.8
99.8
98.1
98.5
99.4
99.3
99.3
99.5
99.2
99.2
99.0
23
33.9
35.0
33.4
35.0
33.6
34.0
33.8
34.6
35.1
32.6
33.0
34.9
34.6
37.8
36.5
33.6
34.7
33.1
37.1
33.0
32.7
34.4
34.0
33.5
34.3
24
•7% 02
186.3
193.4
189.6
186.8
190.9
188.1
182.4
195.6
175.5
171.8
177.3
176.7
180.8
190.2
185.4
178.3
177.1
182.1
179.4
168.8
178.9
186.9
173.3
182.4
182.4
24
CoBBMita/Pracea* lota*:
-------
MLLBUHY RESOURCE RECOVERY PACILITY - QUSs 7-19-88
Daily Data Summary
Inlet inlet Inlet
TIME ppa SO2
1:00
2:00
3:00
4:00
5:00
6:00
7:00
8:00
9:00
10:00
11:00
12:00
13:00
14:00
15:00
16:00
17:00
18:00
19:00
20:00
21:00
22:00
23:00
24:00
Daily
Mean:
Valid
Hour • i
97.5
100.5
98.9
117.9
111.6
104.9
189.2
137.5
78.9
95.5
160.3
90.2
91.4
93.1
63.9
84.1
106.8
158.6
139.7
150.2
235.7
139.5
124.0
110.9
120.0
24
Inlet
Outlet Outlet
%O2 ppe CO ppe HC1 ppe 8O2
10.8
9.7
9.5
9.2
9.8
10.1
10.0
10.2
15.1
12.5
8.8
9.7
9.9
10.2
10.2
9.7
9.6
9.7
8.8
9.4
8.7
9.2
9.0
9.4
10.0
24
26.5
28.2
28.3
28.1
27.3
27.1
27.4
27.0
22.6
26.0
29.3
30.8
30.4
30.5
31.0
29.7
29.8
28.9
28.2
28.0
28.0
27 .«
28.0
28.1
28.2
24
473.2
460.0
534.5
477.9
497.2
615.2
833.5
612.5
650.5
694.7
549.2
595.8
435.6
392.3
557.9
481.4
484.3
509.6
467.8
508.5
448.3
439.9
474.1
530.2
23
14.5
11.6
13.5
16.1
16.4
17.1
46.2
25.6
21.6
14.6
13.9
3.3
5.7
4.0
1.4
4.1
8.0
19.2
16.8
23.1
42.2
15.4
13.7
13.6
15.9
24
Outlet Outlet Opacity
%02 ppe MQx ppe BC1 %
9.9
9.7
9.7
9.4
9.9
10.0
9.9
9.4
10.3
9.5
9.2
10.2
10.2
10.4
10.5
10.1
9.9
9.9
9.2
9,7
9.1
9.6
9.3
9.6
9.8
24
145.7
149.0
140.4
156.4
144.2
146.2
142.8
154.1
136.6
153.4
181.1
170.8
146.7
142.1
151.1
163.7
161.1
169.9
181.7
164.7
174.1
169.4
166.2
164.5
157.3
24
2.4
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.6
1.6
7.1
2.9
1.6
3.9
2.2
1.6
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.9
1.1
1.4
2.0
3.0
1.6
1.4
1.3
1.9
23
1.7
1.7
i.a
1.9
2.0
2.1
2.0
2.1
2.1
2.1
1.9
2.3
2.6
2.2
2.1
2.0
1.9
2.0
1.8
1.7
1.7
1.6
1.7
2.7
2.0
24
-------
RESOURCE RECOVERS PACJXm - DA3SS 7-19-88
Corrected Data Sugary
Inlet Outlet % 8Q2 Inlet Outlet
pp> 802 ppa 8O2 Removal ppm HC1 ppa BC1 R
TIMB 07% 02
1:00
2:00
3:00
4:00
5:00
6:00
7:00
8:00
9:00
10:00
11:00
12:00
13:00
14:00
15:00
16:00
17:00
18:00
19:00
20:00
21:00
22:00
23:00
24:00
24-hour
NMBI
Valid
Boors:
134.2
124.7
120.6
140.1
139.8
135.0
241.3
178.6
189.1
158.0
184.1
111.9
115.5
120.9
83.0
104.4
131.4
196.8
160.5
181.5
268.5
165.7
144.8 •
134.0
152.7
24
07% O2 Efficiency
18.3
14.4
16.8
19.5
20.7
21.8
58.4
30.9
28.3
17.8
16.5
4.3
7.4
5.3
1.9
5.3
10.1
24.3
20.0
28.7
49.7
18.9
16.4
16.7
19.7
24
86.3
88.5
86.1
86.1
85.2
83.8
75.8
82.7
85.0
88.7
91.0
96.2
93.6
95.6
97.7
94.9
92.3
87.7
87.6
84.2
81.5
88.6
88.7
87.5
88.1
24
% HC1
••oval
07% 02 07% 02 Efficiency
757.3
663.8
757.8
660.2
724.0
920.7
1235.9
925.2
1812.7
1336.7
733.6
875.4
658.0
592.6
805.1
688.6
698.9
680.7
657.5
673.7
619.3
597.5
666.3
814.8
23
3.7
2.0
2.0
1.9
2.5
2.5
10.9
4.3
2.6
5.8
3.2
2.5
1.5
1.3
1.1
1.4
1.7
2.0
3.0
4.3
2.4
2.0
2.0
2.9
23
99.5
99.7
99.7
99.7
99.7
99.7
99.1
99.5
99.9
99.6
99.6
99.7
99.8
99.8
99.9
99.8
99.8
99.7
99.5
99.4
99.6
99.7
99.7
99.7
23
Inlet Outlet
pom co ppB not
07% 02
36.5
35.0
34.5
33.4
34.2
34.9 .
34.9
35.1
54.2
43.0
33.7
38.2
38.4
39.6
40.3
36.9
36.7
35.9
32.4
33.8
31.9
33.0
32.7
34.0
36.4
24
07% 02
184.1
184.9
174.2
189.0
182.2
186.4
180.4
186.3
179.1
187.0
215.2
221.9
190.6
188.1
202.0
210.7
203.6
214.7
215.9
204.4
205.1
208.4
199.2
202.3
196.5
24
CoBBBDU/Proceu lota*: Inlet Anarad CB( problem at 00:00-1:00 and 07:00-10:00 period*.
-------
KHLBUKX RESOURCE RECOVERY FACILITY - EATS I 7-20-88
Dally Data Sumazy
Inlet Inlet Inlet
Toe ppn 8O2
1:00
2:00
3:00
4:00
5:00
6:00
7:00
8:00
9:00
10:00
11:00
12:00
13 1 00
14:00
15:00
16:00
17:00
18:00
19:00
20:00
21:00
22:00
23:00
24:00
Daily
Mean:
Valid
Hours:
70.8
99.6
84.3
81.4
33.8
4.0
4.4
5.8
3.6
2.2
2.2
2.4
3.6
4.0
10.6
83.7
116.8
190.7
180.9
141.1
107.5
152.3
109.4
91.4
66.1
24
Inlet Outlet Outlet
%02 pp« 00 pp> BC1 pp» 802
10.1
9.5
12.8
10.8
18.3
21.5
21.5
21.5
21.5
21.6
21.6
21.6
21.6
21.7
20.6
9.4
9.6
8.8
8.8
9.8
8.9
9.8
9.7
9.8
15.0
24
27.9
28.2
24.5
27.3
9.2
2.3
2.7
1.9
2.3
2.8
1.8
1.0
1.9
2.9
6.2
30.0
30.8
30.9
28.9
28.4
27.8
27.6
27.5
27.1
16.7
24
442.5
429.0
402.6
421.0
471.3
407.0
383.4
428. 5
697.2
523.5
481.0
413.1
513.2
494.8
458.9
416.0
527.1
484.4
477.3
450.0
438.6
439.6
488.3
464.7
23
5.4
10.1
16.3
7.9
18.4
17.0
9.0
9.7
26.3
32.0
17.8
29.1
16.0
7.6
3.3
7.6
19.9
31.7
29.0
17.5
10.6
20.4
10.8
9.6
16.0
24
Outlet Outlet Opacity
%02 pp« BOx pp> HC1 %
10.0
9.6
10.5
10.3
9.7
10.9
10.7
9.9
10.3
10.3
9.6
9.S
9.S
9.9
9.7
9.7
8.2
8.9
9.1
9.9
9.2
9.9
9.9
10.0
9.8
24
155.2
160.6
147.6
150.1
160.4
145.0
149.6
152.9
124.7
129.1
153.2
135.2
146.1
149.8
160.1
159.1
122.3
134.3
145.9
140.8
143.8
141.1
146.6
140.2
145.6
24
1.1
1.0
1.0
0.8
1.1
1.3
1.0
0.8
12.8
4.6
3.3
1.8
1.3
1.4
0.9
0.7
1.3
1.0
1.1
0.9
0.9
1.1
1.1
1.8
23
1.8
1.6
1.8
1.8
2.1
2.3
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.6
2.1
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
2.0
2.1
2.0
2.0
2.0
1.8
2.0
2.1
3.3
2.1
24
-------
MZLLBUICr RESOURCE RSCOVERX FACILITY - DUX: 7-20-88
Corrected Data Suaaary
Inlet
pp.802
TDffi 07% 02
1:00 91.1
2:00 121.4
3:00
4:00
5:00
6:00
7:00
8:00
9:00
10:00
11:00
12:00
13:00
14:00
15:00
16:00 101.2
17:00 143.7
18:00 219.1
19:00 207.8
20:00 176.7
21:00 124.5
22:00 190.7
23:00 135.8
24:00 114.5
24-hour
Msan: 147.9
Valid
Hours: 11
Outlet % SO2
pp. SO2 Resoval
07% 02 Efficiency
6.9 92.4
12.4 89.8
21.8
10.4
22.8
23.6
12.3
12.3
34.5
42.0
21.9
35.5
19.5
9.6
4.1
9.4 90.7
36.7 83.2
34.2 83.6
22.1 87.5
12.fi 89.9
25.8 86.5
13.6 89.9
12.2 89.3
19.8 88.3
23 10
Inlet
ppeBCl
07% 02
662.2
608.2
803.4
673.7
680.1
657.8
607.5
629.6
1063.1
798.2
688.0
585.7
727.6
727.0
662.2
584.7
704.1
647.0
695.0
606.1
638.6
634.4
711.0
686.8
23
Outlet
PP.BC1
07% 02
1.7
1.5
1.6
1.3
1.7
2.2
1.7
1.2
20.5
7.4
5.0
2.7
1.9
2.2
1.4
1.1
l.B
1.4
1.7
1.3
1.4
1.7
1.7
2.9
23
% BC1 Inlet
BeBoval ppe. CO
Efficiency 07% O2
99.7 33.9
99.8 34.4
99.8
99.8
99.8
99.7
99.7
99.8
98.1
99.1
99.3
99.3
99.7
99.7
99.8
99.8 36.3
37.9
99.7 35.5
99.8 33.2
99.8 35.6
99.8 32.2
99.8 34.6
99.7 34.1
99.8 33.9
99.6 34.9
23 11
Outlet
DOB MUt
1*1^™ •— »•
07% 02
197.9
197.6
197.3
196.8
199.1
201.6
203.9
193.2
163.5
169.3
188.4
164.8
178.1
189.3
198.7
197.5
155.6
171.9
177.9
170.8
178.3
185.2
178.8
185.0
23
CoasBttita/ProeeM Iotas:
Inlet Anarad CEM problem from 02:00-15:00; need outlet O2
data to coiiect inlet HC1 values daring this tiee. Cal gas
injection into Anared oatlet system during 16:00-17:00 hour.
SDA lias feed fluctuating (8:00-10:00)1 SEA outlet teap. affected.
-------
KXLLBOKX RBSOntCZ RECOVER* FSCJXITI - QMS: 7-21-88
Daily Data SuoB&ry
Inlet Inlet Inlet
TIME ppa 8O2
1:00
2:00
3:00
4:00
5:00
6:00
7:00
8:00
9:00
10:00
11:00
12:00
13:00
14:00
15:00
16:00
17:00
18:00
19:00
20:00
21:00
22:00
23:00
24:00
Daily
HMO:
Valid
Hours:
130.4
116.6
108.2
123.3
106.6
87.3
51.6
68.7
14.2
58.8
139.1
77.2
78.6
86.0
61.3
63.2
74.3
92.4
80.6
68.3
75.9
152.2
107.1
108.0
88.7
24
Inlet
%O2 ppe 00 ppe) HC1 p
9.7
9.6
9.7
9.7
9.9
11.8
14.0
12.8
20.6
15.7
10.8
10.1
10.2
9.7
9.9
10.0
11.4
9.9
10.1
10.3
10.3
9.9
9.7
9.7
11.1
24
27.8
27.6
26.9
27.1
26.9
24.1
21.2
21.8 '
9.7
19.8
32.8
33.1
31.9
29.9
30.2
30.4
23.7
30.5
27.8
26.3
26.1
26.0
26.1
25.0
26.4
24
432.0
455.4
426.8
454.7
594.6
516.2
560.9
469.1
515.9
439.3
406.9
514.7
507.7
434.8
458.2
477.9
489.1
452.0
488.6
478.7
19
Outlet Outlet
£• 802
16.1
11.6
11.4
13.0
15.5
13.8
8.8
10.0
31.0
17.4
25.2
7.0
7.8
9.0
5.2
5.2
19.6
17.9
11.2
10.9
12.7
33.1
20.6
23.8
14.9
24
%02 |
10.0
9.9
9.9
10.0
10.0
10.3
10.2
9.8
8.6
11.5
10.4
10.4
10.3
10.0
10.0
10.1
10.9
10.1
10.4
10.4
10.5
10.1
9.9
10.0
10.2
24
Outlet Outlet Opacity
IBB *f*** at
r)^*1 e^»e» m
145.1
150.6
150.0
147.7
140.4
142.9
140.5
144.3
119.9
119.6
187.4
158.8
156.5
180.0
172.4
174.8
102.6
133.7
130.9
131.0
124.4
120.3
124.4
125.4
142.7
24
7.BC1
1.1
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.5
1.5
1.1
0.9
1.1
1.9
0.8
1.2
0.9
0.9
0.9
1.1
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.2
19
*
2.2
2.7
2.9
3.1
3.1
2.9
3.1
3.3
3.6
3.8
3.7
3.7
4.0
4.1
3.6
3.2
3.2
3.1
3.2
3.2
3.0
3.1
3.3
4.0
•
3.3
24
-------
HILLBURZ RESOURCE RECOVERY FACILITY - DAIS: 7-21-88
Corrected Data Suaury
Inlet Outlet % 8O2
ppa 8O2 ppa 8O2 ReBOval
TIME 07% O2
1:00
2:00
3:00
4:00
5:00
6:00
7:00
8:00
9:00
10:00
11:00
12:00
13:00
14:00
15:00
16:00
17:00
18:00
19:00
20:00
21:00
22:00
23:00
24:00
24-hour
Meant
Valid
Boors i
161.8
143.4
134.3
153.0
134.7
133.3
103.9
117.9
191.4
99.4
102.1
106.7
77.5
80.6
116.8
103.7
89.6
99.5
192.3
132.9
134.0
124.2
21
07% 02 Efficiency
20.5
14.7
14.4
16.6
19.8
18.1
11.4
12.5
35.0
25.7
33.4
9.3
10.2
11.5
6.6
6.7
27.2
23.0
14.8
14.4
17.0
42.6
26.0
30.4
19.2
24
87.3
89.8
89.3
89.2
85.3
86.4
89.0
89.4
82.6
90.7
90.0
89.2
91.4
91.7
80.3
85.7
83.9
82.9
77. 8
8O.4
77.4
86.2
21
Inlet Outlet
pp. BC1 pp. BC1 B
% BC1
•BBval
•7% 02 «7% 02 Efficiency
623.4
651.4
615.9
656.2
873.7
916.8
1313.9
936.0
677.9
755.4
603.4
831.9
746.0
650.7
698.7
728.7
718.7
6S2.3
705.1
755.6
19
1.7
l.S
l.S
1.7
2.3
27»
1.7
1.4
1.5
3.4
1.3
2.0
1.4
1.5
1.5
1.8
2.2
2.2
2.2
1.9
19
99.7
99.8
99.7
99.7
99.7
99.7
99.9
99.9
99.8
99.5
99.8
99.8
99.8
99.8
99.8
99.8
99.7
99.7
99.7
99.7
19
Inlet Outlet
ppa CO ppa BOx
•7% 02
34.5
34.0
33.4
33.6
34.0
36.8
42.7
37.4
45.1
42.6
41.4
37.1
38.2
38.8
38.5
35.8
34.5
34.2
32.9
32.4
31.0
36.6
21
•7% 02
185.0
190.3
189.5
188.4
179.0
187.4
182.5
180.7
135.5
176.9
248.1
210.2
205.2
229.5
219.8
225.0
142.6
172.1
173.3
173.4
166.3
154.8
157.2
159.9
184.7
24
i/ProcaM lota*: Tne Anarad Inlet CBN data from 9:00,10:00 and 17:00 have
reenverl doe to calibration gaa Injection* being taken aa effluent. The inlet
HO. data daring these tlBee have been corrected using the outlet O2 values.
Tbe inlet data frcej the 6:00-8:00 average* indicate BOB* plugging at the
inlet, but the correction to 7%O2 should coepenaate for the error.
-------
HZLLBURX RESOURCE RECOVER! FACILITY - DAXBs 7-22-88
Daily Data
Inlat Inlat Inlat
TDffi ppa 8O2
1:00
2:00
3:00
4:00
5:00
6:00
7:00
8:00
9:00
10:00
11:00
12:00
13:00
14:00
15:00
16:00
17:00
18:00
19:00
20:00
21:00
22:00
23:00
24:00
Daily
Maan:
Valid
Hours:
109.4
82.3
70.6
61.6
67.2
86.7
83.4
97.3
99.8
70.1
62.0
64.5
90.9
60.2
95.5
86.2
3.9
2.2
11.9
22.3
35.3
10.5
37.9
41.7
60.6
24
Inlat
Outlat Outlat
%02 ppm co ppa BC1 ppai 802
9.7
9.9
9.7
10.1
10.1
9.8
10.2
9.5
10.4
10.0
10.2
13.4
10.7
11.3
10.0
9.8
21.2
21.5
20.3
18.9
18.2
20.5
17.5
18.6
13.4
24
26.1
26.3
25.8
25.6
26.3
24.7
25.0
25.6
29.3
31.7
31.8
26.1
32.8
26.2
29.5
28.0
1.1
0.4
5.6
9.6
10.9
5.5
13.3
10.6
20.7
24
656.8
482.5
642.3
440.7
421.2
453.0
453.2
494.9
501.9
421.0
405.4
383.3
477.0
433.3
503.4
661.6
652.4
623.5
415.2
414.1
419.1
443.0
625.6
403.8
492.8
24
40.4
42.3
40.4
39. 7
41.6
49.4
41.8
47.9
38.2
26.3
26.3
25.0
30.1
17.4
29.8
35.8
44.5
44.4
44.7
35.5
50.0
53.1
60.5
84.9
41.1
24
%02 |
9.8
10.1
9.7
10.1
10.1
9.9
10.0
9.7
10.7
10.1
10.2
10.4
10.6
10.6
10.3
10.0
10.2
10.5
10.5
10.3
10.3
10.6
10.1
10.2
10.2
24
Outlat
Outlat Opacity
ppa BOX ppa) BC1 %
119.3
117.1
113.2
110.3
114.2
117.0
115.5
131.4
107.5
118.6
122.8
120.0
119.9
188.1
225.3
230.9
230.6
229.4
218.9
233.3
215.1
204.1
213.2
208.5
163.5
24
9.1
17.6
31.4
25.5
21.8
21.2
18.6
15.2
12.0
8.4
8.7
4.5
5.7
4.2
5.4
18.7
17.9
11.6
6.2
5.8
6.3
5.4
11.2
5.5
12.4
24
3.0
2.8
2.7
2.7
2.8
3.1
3.0
3.2
3.7
3.2
2.9
2.8
2.6
2.3
2.2
2.2
2.5
2.5
2.3
2.2
2.3
2.2
2.4
3.4
2.7
24
-------
KHLBUHX RESOURCE RECOVERY FACILITY - DATS: 7-22-88
Corrected Data SuaBary
Inlet Outlet
ppa SO2 pp> SO2 B
TINS 07% 02
1:00
2:00
3:00
4:00
5:00
6:00
7:00
8:00
9:00
10:00
11:00
12:00
13:00
14:00
15:00
16:00
17:00
18:00
19:00
20:00
21:00
22:00
23:00
24:00
24-hour
Meant
Valid
Boon:
135.8
104.0
87.6
79.3
86. 5
108.6
108.3
118.6
132.1
89.4
80.5
123.9
121.8
107.9
106.0
14
% 8Q2 Inlet Outlet
••oval ppe BC1 ppm BC1 B
•7% O2 Efficiency
SO. 6
54.4
50.1
45.9
53.5
62.4
53.3
59.4
52.1
33.8
34.2
33.1
40.6
23.5
39.1
45.7
57.8
59.3
59.7
46.6
65.6
71.7
77.9
110.3
53.4
24
62.7
47.7
42.8
42.0
38.1
42.5
50.8
49.9
60.6
62.1
57.6
67.2
67.9
57.7
53.5
14
•7% 02
947.8
709.0
926.9
659.5
630.3
659.6
684.6
701.7
772.6
624.3
612.4
590.0
755.8
679.9
746.5
963.4
985.5
969.0
645.3
631.4
639.0
695.2
936.2
610.0
740.7
24
% BC1
••oval
•7% O2 Efficiency
13.9
27.6
47.5
40.0
34.2
32.7
28.9
23.0
19.9
13.2
13.8
7.3
9.4
6.9
8.6
29.1
28.4
18.9
10.1
9.3
10.1
8.9
17.6
8.7
19.5
24
98.5
96.1
94.9
93.9
94.6
95.0
95.8
96.7
97.4
97.9
97.7
98.8
98.8
99.0
98.8
97.0
97.1
98.0
98.4
98.5
98.4
98.7
98.1
98.6
97.4
24
Inlet Outlet
ppa CO pp> won
»7% 02
32.4
33.2
32.0
32.9
33.8
30.9
32.5
31.2
38.8
40.4
41.3
44.7
37.6
35.1
35.5
14
•7% 02
149.4
150.7
140.5
142.0
147.0
147.8
147.3
163.1
146.5
152.6
159.5
158.9
161.8
253.8
295.4
294.5
299.6
306.6
292.6
305.9
282.1
275.4
274.4
270.9
213.3
24
/Procee« Botea: There vae an Anarad inlet CEN problea tram 12:00,14:00, and 17:00-24:00.
The inlet HC1 data «»n»-tnq theee periods were corrected using
outlet 02 data.
-------
MXLLBURX RESOURCE RECOVER* FACILITY - DA3S: 7-23-88
Daily Data Bimaxy
Inlet Inlet Inlet
TDffi ppa 802
1:00
2:00
3:00
4:00
5:00
6:00
7:00
8:00
9:00
10:00
11:00
12:00
13:00
14:00
15:00
16:00
17:00
18:00
19:00
20:00
21:00
22:00
23:00
24:00
Daily
Mean:
Valid
Hour*:
51.7
80.1
53.3
82.4
45.0
52.9
94.0
73.6
105.7
74.2
96.9
83.3
94.0
123.5
153.7
177.1
196.0
131.0
248.8
202.3
177.9
179.4
242.6
139.0
123.3
24
%O2 pp> CO ]
16.7
15.4
15.2
14.2
16.6
15.4
11.7
12.2
11.3
11.3
11.9
11.5
12.3
11.0
9.2
9.4
9.6
9.9
9.6
9.4
8.5
8.0
7.9
9.7
11.6
24
15.5
17.6
17.6
18.5
15.1
16.9
22.0
21.9
25.9
27.5
27.5
28.2
27.3
28.9
30.8
30.8
30.4
30.6
29.5
30.1
29.3
29.1
28.8
29.2
25.4
24
Inlet
Outlet Outlet
K» HC1 ppa 802
493.9
396.7
494.2
560.7
610.7
515.5
574.7
512.8
455.8
517.1
498.0
445.3
591.0
509.1
548.3
533.5
455.7
459.1
489.7
486.2
538.5
673.0
792.9
528.4
23
43.0
43.3
19.9
31.6
27.1
20.8
28.7
23.2
57.8
16.6
24.6
19. 5
18.5
20.7
24.3
31.5
35.3
18.9
52.8
34.0
30.5
33.5
56.8
46.3
31.6
24
Outlet
Outlet Opacity
%02 pp» MX pp» HC1 %
9.9
10.0
9.8
9.8
10.3
10.1
9.7
9.9
10.9
10.1
10.0
10.4
10.3
9.9
9.8
9.8
10.0
10.4
10.0
9.9
9.1
8.8
8.7
10.2
9.9
24
224. S
213.2
226.6
217.8
208.0
203.9
197.1
193.7
154.6
172.1
198.4
201.0
194.1
197.0
190.6
191.6
194.0
197.4
184.9
195.8
198.1
201.4
203.8
177.8
197.4
24
4.8
2.4
1.6
1.7
1.9
1.2
2.6
5.7
37.0
5.9
3.0
1.1
1.3
1.0
1.0
1.1
0.7
0.8
0.8
0.8
1.0
1.4
9.1
3.8
23
2.4
2.5
2.7
2.8
2.9
2.9
2.8
2.6
2.3
1.9
2.0
2.2
2.2
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.4
2.3
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.7
2.7
V
3.8
2.5
24
-------
MXLLBUKT RESOURCE RECOVER? FAdLITr - DUX I 7-23-88
Corrected Data Siaoiary
Inlet Outlet % SO2
ppe 8O2 ppe 8O2 Reaaval
TIMB 07% O2 07% O2 Efficiency
1:00
2:00
3:00
4:00
5:00
6:00
7:00
8:00
9:00
10:00
11:00
12:00
13:00
14:00
15:00
16:00
17:00
18:00.
19:00
20:00
21:00
22:00
23:00
24:00
24-hour
Mean:
Valid
Hour*:
142.0
117.6
153.0
107.4
149.7
123.2
151.9
173.4
182.6
214.1
241.1
165.5
306.0
244.5
199.4
193.3
259.4
172.5
183.2
111
54.3
55.2
24.9
39.6
35.5
26.8
35.6
29.3
80.3
21.4
31.4
25.8
24.3
26.2
30.4
39.4
45.0
25.0
67.3
43.0
35.9
38.5
64.7
60.1
40.0
24
74.9
75.1
47.5
80.1
79.0
79.0
84.0
84.9
83.3
81.6
81.3
84.9
78.0
82.4
82.0
80.1
75.1
65.1
77.7
18
Inlet
ppe BC1 p
07% 02
725.7
588.2
719.6
816.4
931.2
771.5
829.4
753.5
736.7
773.9
738.4
679.0
868.4
703.3
770.6
763.1
669.6
656.7
688.3
633.7
674.7
836.7
1144.2
759.7
23
Outlet % BC1
•pm BC1 Reaoval
07% 02 Efficiency
7.4
3.7
2.4
2.6
3.0
1.9
3.9
8.8
62.7
9.3
4.7
1.8
2.0
1.5
1.5
1.7
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.1
1.4
1.9
14.4
6.2
23
99.0
99.4
99.7
99.7
99.7
99.8
99.5
98.8
91.5
98.8
99.4
99.7
99.8
99.8
99.8
99.8
99.8
99.8
99.8
99.8
99.8
99.8
98.7
99.2
23
Inlet Outlet
PP» CO ppe Ktx
07% 02 07% 02
33.2
35.0
37.5
39.8
42.5
41.7
44.1
40.6
36.6
37.2
37.4
38.7
36.3
36.4
32.8
31.4
30.8
36.2
37.1
18
283.7
271.9
283.8
272.7
272.8
262.4
244.6
244.8
214.9 .
221.5
253.0
266.1
254.5
248.9
238.7
239.9
247.4
261.3
235.8
247.4
233.4
231.4
232.2
231.0
249.8
24
CoBBenta/Proceaa Botea: Tbe 9:00 HC1 outlet reading includes 4 6-MLnnte avexagee
which vere of f-ecale on a 0-60ppa eaiiiireaant range. The inlet BC1
data tram 0:00-14:00 ware corrected naing outlet O2 values.
Six 8D& nosclea were in operation at 02:30.
-------
RBSOURCB RBCOVSKT FAcnrrr - DATS: 7-24-88
Daily Data SuBBaxy
TIMS
1*00
2*00
3*00
4*00
5*00
6:00
7:00
8:00
9:00
10:00
11:00
12:00
13:00
14*00
15*00
16:00
17:00
18:00
19:00
20:00
21:00
22:00
23:00
24:00
Daily
Maans
Valid
Hour a:
Inlat
ppa 802
164.1
132.8
208.7
288.7
208.1
122.5
123.9
163.2
179.8
205.2
181.1
172.9
148.2
145.9
173.6
101.2
109.3
149.8
167.6
135.5
119.4
232.8
238.4
170.8
168.5
24
Inlat
%02
9.5
9.1
9.4
9.4
9.2
8.6
8.7
9.5
8.9
9.4
9.7
9.7
9.8
9.0
9.4
10.3
9.3
9.7
8.7
9.5
10.2
10.4
9.2
9.1
9.4
24
Inlat
PP» 0) ]
28.4
28.4
27.7
26.6
26.2
25.9
25.6
24.8
27.3
28.4
30.4
33.2
35.9
35.5
35.2
35.7
35.5
34.9
35.5
35.4
35.7
36.2
35.0
35.2
31.6
24
Inlat
n»aci
683.7
565.7
504.7
460.9
494.5
384.8
407.0
405.6
488.3
494.6
525.1
579.8
477.4
473.7
499.8
416.6
777.7
815.7
722.2
482.6
505.7
440.7
412.1
522.6
23
Ontlat
Pt»802
42.6
27.2
46.9
73.7
41.8
21.5
24.5
36.7
40.7
39.0
33.2
36.2
30.0
22.3
33.0
16.4
16.4
45.0
44.0
36.6
20.5
49.6
49.1
27.8
35.6
24
Ontlat
%02 |
9.9
9.7
9.8
9.8
9.7
9.3
9.4
9.9
9.6
9.8
10.1
10.0
10.2
9.5
9.8
10.6
9.8
9.9
9.3
4.8
10.5
10.6
9.6
9.6
9.8
24
Outlet
PP»K*
195.5
196.9
197.2
192.6
183.6
192.9
193.0
196.9
210.6
189.1
184.4
176.9
176.9
192.3
186.5
166.8
189.0
183.0
191.9
180.7
167.7
174.7
185.8
192.5
187.4
24
Ontlat Opacity
ppaiHCl
4.5
1.6
1.3
1.4
1.2
0.8
0.6
0.8
0.6
1.2
1.2
2.0
1.5
1.9
2.5
1.7
11.9
11.1
8.9
2.5
1.5
1.5
1.2
2.8
23
*
2.9
3.1
3.6
3.8
3.8
3.8
3.7
3.8
3.8
3.6
3.5
3.1
2.9
2.7
2.5
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.4
2.4
2.5
2.7
3.9
•
3.1
24
-------
KOLBURZ RESOURCE RECOVER! FACILITY - D&XB: 7-24-68
Corrected Data Smory
Inlet Outlet % BO2
pp> SO2 pfm SO2 Reaoval
TIME 07% 02
1:00
2:00
3:00
4:00
5:00
6:00
7:00
8:00
9:00
10:00
11:00
12:00
13:00
14:00
15:00
16:00
17:00
18:00
19:00
20:00
21:00
22:00
23:00
24:00
2 4- hour
Mean:
Valid
Boon:
200.1
156.4
252.3
349.0
247.2
138.4
141.2
199.0
208.3
248.0
224.8
214.6
185.6
170.4
209.8
132.7
131.0
185.9
191.0
165.2
155.1
308.2
283.2
201.2
204.1
24
07% O2 Efficiency
53.8
33.8
58.7
92.3
51.9
25.8
29.6
46.4
SO.l
48.8
42.7
46.2
39.0
27.2
41.3
22.1
20.5
56.9
52.7
45.8
27.4
66.9
60.4
34.2
44.8
24
73.1
78.4
76.7
73.6
79.0
81.4
79.0
76.7
76.0
80.3
81.0
78.5
79.0
84.0
80.3
83.3
84.3
69.4
72.4
72.3
82.3
78.3
78.7
83.0
78.4
24
Inlet Outlet % BC1
ppa BC1 ppa BC1 Removal
07% 02 07% 02 Efficiency
969.3
774.9
709.3
647.8
683.1
505.6
539.2
575.1
657.7
695.1
757.8
844.3
648.4
665.8
762.1
580.5
1122.3
1080.7
1023.9
729.0
778.4
608.8
564.5
735.8
23
6.9
2.4
2.0
2.1
1.8
1.2
0.9
1.2
0.9
1.8
1.9
3.2
2.2
2.9
4.1
2.6
18.3
16.2
13.6
4.1
2.5
2.3
1.8
4.2
23
99.3
99.7
99.7
99.7
99.7
99.8
99.8
99.8
99.9
99.7
99.8
99.6
99.7
99.6
99.5
99.6
98.4
98.5
98.7
99.4
99.7
99.6
99.7
99.5
23
Inlet
ppB CO ]
07% 02
34.6
33.5
33.5
32.2
31.1
29.3
29.2
30.2
31.6
34.3
37.7
41.2
45.0
41.5
42.5
46.8
42.5
43.3
40.4
43.2
46.4
47.9
41.6
41.5
38.4
24
Outlet
ppB •ox
07% 02
247.0
244.4
246.9
241.2
227.9
231.1
233.3
248.8
259.1
236.8
237.3
225.6
229.8
234.5
233.5
225.1
236.7
231.2
229.9
226.3
224.1
235.8
228.6
236.8
235.5
24
CoBBurta/Proceu Botee: At 11:30, 5 SDA nozzle* were operating. At 16:42, 6 nozzles
were in eervice.
-------
MULBUHI RESOURCE RECOVERY FACQ.ITX - DlOSl 7-25-88
Daily Oat* Suaeazy
Inlet Inlet Inlet
TOO PPB SO2
1:00
2:00
3:00
4:00
5:00
6:00
7:00
8:00
9:00
10:00
11:00
12:00
13:00
14:00
15:00
16:00
17:00
18:00
19:00
20:00
21:00
22:00
23:00
24:00
Daily
Mean:
Valid
Hour*:
126.9
149.0
160.4
146.6
180.4
175.3
203.8
146.1
151.5
154.2
124.3
169.3
156.8
114.0
143.1
154.1
123.8
203.9
231.9
112.6
100.4
157.5
151.6
141.6
153.3
24
Inlet
Outlet Outlet
%02 ppB CO ppa BC1 ppB B02
9.4
9.4
9.6
9.3
9.0
9.1
9.3
9.2
9.5
9.9
9.6
10.3
9.6
9.8
9.4
10.1
9.8
10.3
8.8
10.1
9.4
9.8
9.8
9.8
9.6
24
34.1
34.3
34.5
34.6
34.1
33.4
33.6
34.0
31.0
29.7
30.7
31.4
30.2
30.8
31.5
30.4
32.0
32.0
30.0
30.3
30.0
30.9
31.8
30.5
31.9
24
491.6
413.1
423.9
421.6
565.1
461.0
472.7
415.4
473.7
488.2
440.5
438.9
459.0
564.7
434.7
414.8
448.4
486.9
431.8
527.1
515.1
508.2
532.9
470.8
23
21.7
27.3
31.6
26.7
42.2
38.9
45.3
28.2
28.0
31.8
26.9
31.9
27.9
17.3
29.1
28.6
21.8
41.4
41.2
16.0
14.5
26.1
23.6
24.5
28.9
24
outlet outlet opacity
%02 ppa BOX ppa BC1 %
9.8
9.8
10.0
9.8
9.5
9.5
9.8
9.6
10.1
10.2
10.1
10.5
10.0
10.2
9.8
10.3
10.1
10.6
9.3
10.4
9.8
10.2
10.1
10.0
10.0
24
194.4
190.8
194.7
187.7
201.3
195.1
201.0
194.9
182.2
157.5
171.6
173.6
188.3
179.6
191.2
176.4
175.2
165.9
193.4
192.6
186.9
182.3
184.2
194.0
185.6
24
1.3
1.0
1.0
0.8
1.3
1.6
1.9
1.0
1.3
1.5
1.0
1.0
0.5
0.8
• 0.4
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.4
0.3
0.6
0.8
23
2.9
2.8
2.8
2.9
3.0
3.0
3.0
2.8
2.6
2.3
2.3
2.1
1.7
1.6
2.3
1.7
1.6
1.7
1.7
1.9
2.1
2.3
2.3
3.3
2.4
24
-------
KXLLBUHI RESOURCE RECOVERY FACILITr - QMS I 7-25-88
Oomctad Data sunaaxy
Iol«t Ontlat % 8O2
Inlet Outlet
% BC1 Inlet
Outlet
pp> 302 pj» SO2 Raaoval ppa BC1 pp> BC1 H«annal ppa CO ppa BOx
TIME 67% 02 07% 02 Efficiency t7% O2 «7% O2 Efficiency «7% O2 «7% O2
1:00
2:00
3:00
4:00
5:00
6:00
7:00
8:00
9:00
10:00
11:00
12:00
13:00
14:00
15:00
16:00
17:00
18:00
19:00
20:00
21:00
22:00
23:00
24:00
24-hour
Mean:
Valid
Boon:
153.4
180.1
197.3
175.7
210.7
206.5
244.2
173.6
184.7
194.9
152.9
222.0
192.9
142.8
173.0
198.3
155.0
267.4
266.4
144.9
121.4
197.2
189.8
177.3
188.4
24
27.2
34.2
40.3
33.4
51.5
47.4
56.7
34.7
36.0
41.3
34.6
42.6
35.6
22.5
36.4
37.5
28.1
55.9
49.4
21.2
18.2
33.9
30.4
31.2
36.7
24
82.3
81.0
79.6
81.0
75.6
77.0
76.8
80.0
80.5
78.8
77.4
80.8
81.6
84.3
78.9
81.1
81.9
79.1
81.5
85.4
85.0
82.8
84.0
82.4
80.8
24
690.9
580.6
606.3
587.4
767.5
631.4
658.6
573.8
671.6
717.3
671.7
627.8
668.4
793.7
650.6
604.0
683.7
650.4
646.2
740.8
750.0
740.0*
776.0*
673.4
23
2.0
1.5
1.6
1.2
1.9
2.4
2.9
1.5
2.0
2.4
1.6
1.6
0.8
1.2
0.6
0.3
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.3
0.6
0.5
0.9
1.3
23
99.7
99.7
99.7
99.8
99.7
99.6
99.6
99.7
99.7
99.7
99.8
99.8
99.9
99.8
99.9
99.9
99.9
99.9
99.9
100.0
99.9
99.9
99.9
99.8
23
41.2
41.5
42.4
41.5
39.8
39.3
40.3
40.4
37.8
37.5
37.8
41.2
37.1
38.6
38.1
39.1
40.1
42.0
34.5
39.0
36.3
38.7
39.8
38.2
39.3
24
243.4
238.9
248.3
235.0
245.4
237.9
251.7
239.7
234.5
204.6
220.9
232.0
' 240.1
233.3
239.4
231.3
225.5
223.9
231.7
255.0
234.0
236.8
237.1
247.4
236.2
24
CoBBMita/PraceeB Botea: At 17:20, 5 nocxlae von in service.
-------
RESOURCE RECOVERY FACILITY / OTIT 2 - DATE: 7/26/88
Daily Data Sumary
Inlet Inlet Inlet
TIME ppn 802
1:00
2:00
3:00
4:00
5:00
6:00
7:00
8:00
9:00
10:00
11:00
12:00
13:00
14:00
15:00
16:00
17:00
18:00
19:00
20:00
21:00
22:00
23:00
24:00
Daily
Mean:
Valid
Hour a:
118.4
152.8
150.1
123.9
274.0
172.6
196.1
137.1
151.1
121.8
94.7
105.2
93.2
92.9
93.4
90.6
103.4
137.0
123.1
126.6
210.2
171.6
119.8
137.4
23
Inlet Outlet Outlet
%O2 pp« CO ppei BC1 ppa SO2
10.0
9.5
9.4
10.0
8.8
9.2
9.5
9.1
10.5
9.9
9.9
10.1
-0.5
10.2
10.7
10.6
10.2
10.0
10.8
10.1
9.9
9.7
10.3
9.7
9.5
24
30.1
29.7
29.7
30.4
29.8
29.5
30.9
30.8
31.9
32.8
31.4
33.2
31.1
30.1
31.3
31.5
28.2
29.1
28.5
27.5
28.1
28.9
29.5
30.2
23
441.7
587.5
524.2
491.3
559.2
497.8
409.3
457.1
398.2
505.2
464.2
441.0
560.3
448.6
478.8
467.9
503.0
448.4
532.1
482.9
456.2
444.0
427.4
524.7
481.3
24
20.1
33.1
31.4
24.8
54.0
32.3
37.3
22.7
28.6
18.1
10.7
14.5
33.8
14.5
U.I
16.2
14.9
12.1
24.6
27.0
19.5
41.9
31.8
21.6
*
24.9
24
%02 |
10.4
10.0
9.9
10.3
9.3
9.7
9.9
9.7
10.9
10.3
10.3
10.4
10.3
10.2
10.4
10.6
10.3
10.3
10.9
10.2
10.3
9.9
10.3
10.0
10.2
24
Outlet Outlet Opacity
ppB BOX ppa HC1 %
188.8
186.3
182.5
194.1
198.1
190.3
186.0
185.1
168.0
174.4
195.8
184.5
183.6
181.8
200.0
192.2
201.0
205.1
185.2
194.6
193.7
206.4
188.6
190.3
189.9
24
0.4
0.6
0.9
0.7
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.4
0.4
1.3
0.7
0.8
1.2
1.9
1.1
1.1
1.3
0.9
0.9
1.4
1.1
1.0
1.1
1.1
0.9
24
2.4
2.4
2.4
2.6
2.6
2.7
2.6
2.4
2.1
1.6
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.6
1.8
1.8
2.0
2.0
2.1
2.0
2.1
2.2
2.2
3.2
2.1
24
-------
RBSOUBCK RECOVER* FACILITY / UVIT 2 - OATSI 7/26/88
Corrected Data Summary
Inlet Outlet
ppai 802 pp« 802 B
TIME «7% 02
1:00
2:00
3:00
4:00
5:00
6:00
7:00
8:00
9:00
10:00
11:00
12:00
13:00
14:00
15:00
16:00
17:00
18:00
19:00
20:00
21:00
22:00
23:00
24:00
24-bour
Mean:
Valid
Bonn:
151.0
186.3
181.4
158.0
314.8
205.1
239.1
161.5
202.0
153.9
119.7
135.4
121.1
126.6
126.0
117.7
131.9
188.5
158.4
160.0
260.9
225.0
148.7
172.7
23
% 8O2 Inlet Outlet % HC1
••oval ffm BC1 fpm BC1 Removal
•7% 02 Efficiency
26.6
42.2
39.7
32.5
64.7
40.1
47.1
28.2
39.8
23.7
14.0
19.2
44.3
18.8
17.3
21.9
19.5
15.9
34.2
35.1
25.6
52.9
41.7
27.5
32.2
24
82.4
77.3
78.1
79.4
79.4
80.5
80.3
82.6
80.3
84.6
88.3
85. 8
84.4
86.3
82.7
83.4
88.0
81.9
77.9
84.0
79.7
81.5
81.5
82.2
23
07% O2 »7% O2 Efficiency
655.0
833.0
736.7
728.5
747.0
687.7
580.3
626.1
618.8
742.3
682.1
660.0
924.1
677.6
758.7
734.2
759.8
664.9
851.5
722.7
670.3
640.7
651.7
757.2
713.0
24
0.6
0.9
1.4
1.1
1.2
1.1
0.9
0.6
0.7
2.1
1.1
1.3
1.9
3.0
1.8
1.8
2.1
1.4
1.5
2.2
1.8
1.5
1.8
1.7
1.5
24
99.9
99.9
99.8
99.8
99.8
99.8
99.8
99.9
99.9
99.7
99.8
99.8
99.8
99.6
99.8
99.8
99.7
99.8
99.8
99.7
99.7
99.8
99.7
99.8
99.8
24
Inlet
ffm CO |
•7% 02
38.4
36.2
35.9
38.8
34.2
35.0
37.7
36.3
42.6
41.4
39.7
42.7
40.4
41.0
42.2
40.9
36.0
40.0
36.7
34.8
34.9
37.9
36.6
38.3
23
Outlet
H» »0*
•7% 02
249.9
237.6
230.6
254.5
237.4
236.2
235.0
229.7
233.5
228.7
256.8
244.2
240.8
236.2
264.8
259.4
263.6
269.0
257.4
252.8
254.0
260.8
247.3
242.7
246.8
24
CoBBjMits/process Bates:
SDa Inlet 8O2, O2, and GO cat data were invalid during the
hour of 1200-1300. The eduetor wash was installed *"rt"q this
hour on the Unit 2 m» Inlet >*"«»< < tanning box.
The Inlet HC1 •easureasnt value for the hour of 1200-1300 was
corrected to ppe BC1 I 7% 02 using the outlet O2 value. Daily
cal check on BC1 CBMS was performed tram 12:36-13:19; no BC1 dat«
was lost since >50% of data was collected during «<--•• !riiv:
-------
1ILLBURY RESOURCE RECOVERY FACILITY ,' UNIT 2 - DATE: 7/27/88
Daily Data Suecarv
"'1C n
! ..it p
1:00
2:00
3:00
4:00
c . .1ft
.' t .'V
6:00
7:00
3:00
7:00
10:00
1 1 • Aft
Ai» V V
12:00
13:00
14:00
• 15:00
1 i . ftft
- j : v v
';. ill)
13:00
9:00
0:00
1:00
2:00
3:00
4:00
Daily
lean:
Valid
Hour?:
Inlet I
3B S22
123.0
151.5
125.0
' 72 5
175.1
173.4
Ha.9
175.8
151.1
149.0
100.2
124.5
56.1
'. 1 S
i 4 • w1
33.2
129.3
103.0 .
79.3
94.7
0^ C
.' / i U
=4.1
115.2
• fi g
l*i. 7
MO 7
113.3
24
nlet I
so: ?p
9.7
9.6
9.4
9.3
9.4
?.t
0 C
' 1 U
9.1
.9.3
10.1
3.B
9.4
16.6
21.1
17.7
9.6
9.9
9.9
9.S
9.7
10.4
10.1
9.9
10.9
10.8
24
nlet
s CD
29.5
29.7
30.6
30.5
30.3
30.0
29.1
29.2
29.4
T^ *l
J+ . V
30.6
29.9
17.2
6.9
12.0
29.5
29.2
23.4
23-. 0
27.1
17 C
.. / » J
27.2
27.0
2S.6
T? ?
*.< * A
24
Inlet
;pi HC1 ;
524.4
473.1
503.7
477.6
197.2
497,1
r27.3
461.6
507. 8
499.6
545.9
711.2
658.5
514.0
130.9
i37.E
539. 4
5:4.0
448.9
529.3
457.:
424.1
477.7
480.3
511.9
24
Outlet
pa SC2
21.3
25.6
19.6
27.1
-7 L
Jw • W
34.5
32.4
36.7
30.0
29.9
16.5
43.0
26.5
46.7
18.5
22.0
16.5
11.2
5.7
14.8
* i.' • V
12.9
15.4
12.6
23.8
24
Outlet
rm
/.ui
10.0
9.6
9.8
9.6
9.5
9,t
9.9
9.3
9.9
10.3
9.3
9.S
13.5
10. S
9.9
9.9
10.1
• 10.2
10.1
10. 1
10.6
10.3
10.2
11.0
10.2
24
Outlet
}pi NOx p
191.9
195.2
193.3
201.3
191.3
.191.2
192.4
198.2
177.2
197.8
231.0
248.7
137.8
192. S
262.4
242.4
249.6
246.9
243.9
233.6
223.4
240. S
246.4
222.4
214.9
24
Juliet C
n HC1 '
1.2
1.1
0.9
0.9
1.0
i.C
'. 1
* • *
1.4
1.1
• 7
- . w
0.7
5.9
4.2
2.1
1.1
0.7
0.7
A ••
0.6
0.7
).3
0.6
0.6
0.6
1 7
24
pacity
X
2.2
2.2
2.1
2.4
2.7
3.0
2.6
2.4
1 t
± I W
2.0
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.6
1.7
1.7
2.9
2.0
22
-------
KILLE'JRY RESOURCE RECOVERY FACILITY / UNIT 2 - DftTE: 7/27/88
Corrected Data Suaaarv
Inlet Outlet 1 302
ppa 502 pp§ 502 Recoval
T:HE «7I 02 i7X 02 Efficiency
1:00
2:00
3:00
4:00
?:00
4:00
7:00
3:00
?:vO
10:00
1 1:00
» 1 1 » -'j
;3:00
14:00
15:00
lt:00
17:00
12:00
19:00
2C:00
21:00
22:00
23:00
24:00
152.7
186.1
151.1
206.7
212.9
213.3
124.0
207.1
131.1
191. S
115.1
150.5
159.1
130.2
100.2
106.1
121.0
124.6
148.3
130.6
156.0
27.2
32.1
24.5
33.3
41.0
43.2
40.9
44.0
7.7.9
39.2
lc.3
53.3
49.3
64.3
23.4
27.8
21.2
14.5
* « *»
li • *
19.0
20. i
16.9
20.0
17.7
82.2
S2.8
33.3
33.9
30.8
79.7
77.7
78.8
73.1
79. i
22.3
64.2
32.5
93.7
S5.5
39.4
S4.3
83.4
38. 6
58.9
38.7
Iniet Outlet 1 HC1
ppa HC1 ppc HC1 Reaoval
*7l 02 871 02 Efficiency
756.8
676.7
715.0
665.5
634.7
711.0
767.8
632.3
707.5
747.7
72?. 2
999. t
1612.6
OQ7 f
07 J . -J
i32.3
697.7
566.0
S28.7
i53.fc
764.6
704.4
=34.7
701.9
777.1
1.9
1.7
1.4
1.4
1.5
1.5
.7
.0
7
. L
1.0
°.'t-
9.6
•? c
w • v
1.7
1.1
1.1
1.1
0.9
1.1
1.3
1.0
1.0
1.0
99.8
99.8
99.3
99.8
99.8
99.8
99.9
99.7
?9.B
99.7
99.9
99.1
99.4
99.6
99.8
99.8
99.9
99.9
99.9
99.9
99. S
99.8
99.9
99.9
Inlet Cutlet
ppi CO opi NOx
871 02 871 02
36.6
36.5
37.0
36.5
36.6
36.9
36.4
34.4
35.2
41.2
35.2
36.1
36.3
36.9
~* q
vc . 7
35.1
33.6
36.4
35.0
34.1
39.3
244.7
244.4
242.1
247.6
233.9
239.4
243.1
237.5
223.9
259.4
276.3
311.4
253.8
265.3
331.6
306.3
321.2
320.7
320.3
300.7
301.5
315.8
320.1
312.3
24-hc;ir
160.9
31.0
52.4
2.1
99.8
36.:
Velid
Hours:
24
24
Coaaents/Process Nstes:
solenoit! valve for newiy installed eductor Mash an 3DA Inlet
talfunctisned. nnarad service representative reaoved solenoid and
returned the satpling systea to the original configuration
(i.e., no autoiatic eductor *ash) until a r=pla:caent solenoid
:an be installed (possibly tCiorroH), SDA Inlet aeasureient data
'ro§ 12:00-15:00 are invalid because of the valve problea.
Inlet m dati frca 12:00-15:00 sere corrected tc ppt HC1 8 71 02
usinc outlet j2 values. HC1 cal check conducted frot 09:31-10:20.
Opacity data free 13:00-15:00 are invalid because an audit was
performed cr the osacitv 2-EH curing this tiae.
-------
JIILLBURY RESOURCE RECOVERY FACILITY / UNIT 2 - DATE: 7/28/E
Dailv Data Suaaarv
TI-E
1:00
2:00
7:00
4:00
5:00
i ! '.'•.'
~:00
3:00
;:00
10:00
11:00
12:00
13:00
14:00
15:00
16:00
17:00
18:00
i':00
20:00
i:vO
2:00
3:00
24:00
Daily
(lean:
Valid
Hours:
Ir.iet
ppa 502
120.9
132.5
123. 8
150.7
'"9.9
141.6
iii n
1 T •!• . u
lic.6
115.5
90.6
100.1
59.4
?0.6
3?. 3
49.3
72.1
79.1
T7.2
37.
-r
109.
55.
=4.
=6.9
105.3
24
Inlet
"02
9.4
9.5
= .3
;.l
9.4
"" i '.'
5.9
?.o
10.3
9.9
10.6
10.2
9.5
3 «
1 1 fc
11.2
3.2
9.1
9.2
9.5
:.~
5.3
.0.1
10.0
5.9
9.6
24
Inlet
pps CO
27.6
27.6
27.7
27.3
23.0
27.8
27.5
23.3
~i i
33.7
34.6
35.9
35.5
•f *.
35.5
30.7
30.4
31.0
31.1
70.6
.'• A i V
77 *?
30.3
30.6
30.9
24
Inlet
ppa KC1 3
511.4
534.2
514.5
296.3
svi.2
514.6
159.2
910.1
1040.2
747.5
161.4
480.4
705.6
572.9
560.1
443.4
*6G. 2
450.5
459.5
416.4
156.0
474.1
130.2
413.3
562.9
24
Outlet
pa S02
11.2
21.3
14.5
24.4
21.5
16.2
17.1
42.7
31.7
12. E
14.1
9.0
18.7
13.5
11.0
8.8
10.7
' 1 *
4 i • i
* * V
« 1
2 .6
1 .9
15.0
16.2
: 7 •?
A / I i.
24
Outlet
V'T*
9.8
9.9
9.8
9.5
9.3
9.4
l.Z
9.4
10.5
10.1
10.7
10.4
10.1
9.9
11.3
9.6
9.6
9.6
9.3
10.0
10.1
- .' « j
13.3
10.1
t f\ A
4. V 1 V
24
Outlet
pps NOx
239.5
225.2
236.0
237.1
225.3
229.9
243.6
4. JO * J
162.4
156.9
202.1
191.9
'72 '
153.7
144.2
136.3
197.7
1S5.4
1S5.2
172.1
166.5
153.3
i .'' *! t i
130. c
194.0
24
Outlet
ppa HCI
0.6
2.8
1.3
2.2
3.0
' ^
1.2
6.7
23.0
7.7
2.1
0.9
3.4
4.1
3.7
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.9
0.9
L « L
7 L
1. • M
1.6
1.9
3.1
24
Jpacity
I
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.9
1.9
2.0
2.0
1.8
1.8
1.6
1.5
1.4
3.3
3.2
2.5
2.4
•J 7
2.3
1 7
2.4
2.4
3.4
2.1
24
-------
"ILLB'JRY RESOURCE RECOVERY FACILITY / UNIT 2 - DATE: 7/23/88
Corrected Data Sumary
HUE
1:00
2:00
3:00
i:00
5:00
::00
" : 00
;:':0
•~:vO
10:00
11:00
12:00
13:00
14:00
1::00
ls:00
17:00
15:00
;?:00
20:00
2i:vO
22:00
23:00
24:00
24-hour
*°&n;
Valid
Hours:
Iniet
ppi 5G2
871 02
146.1
161.6
148.3
177.5
169.1
165.4
170.?
196.?
151.5
114.5
135.1
116.1
113.5
108.9
70.6
S5.7
93.2
91.7
106.2
91.6
137.5
109. £
120.3
122.4
129.3
24
Outlet
ppi 502
§71 02
14.0
26.9
13.2
29.8
26.9
19.6
2v.5
51.6
42.4
16.5
19.2
11.9
14.1
23.4
15.?
1A Q
AV • O
13.2
13.7
16.3
14.2
2?.l
24.8
1".7
20.9
21.3
24
I 502
Reioval
Efficiency
90.4
83.3
67.8
83.2
34.1
38.2
CD t\
UW • V
73.2
72.0
35.6
95.8
S9.7
73.3
78.5
77.5
37.4
55.9
85.1
34.7
84.5
73.2
77.4
S3. 6
S3.0
33.2
24
Inlet
ppi HC1
871 02
718.8
828.3
716.9
953.7
352.0
715.2
=53.5
1236.1
1586.1
1098.3
724.0
725.7
1027.4
954.0
P33.3
612.5
630.3
622.3
651.5
600.9
564.0
709.5
J37.9
607.3
310.8
24
Outlet
ppi HC1
871 02
0.9
4.3
2.0
•J • V
4.6
1.8
1.8
9.9
37.5
12.1
7 5
\f • w
1.5
5.3
6.3
6.5
0.9
1.1
1.1
1.4
1.4
1.9
4.2
2.6
3.0
4.9
24
I HC1
Reiovai
Efficiency
99.9
99.5
99.7
99.7
99.5
79.8
7?. 7
=9.2
97.6
98.9
99.5
99.8
99.5
99.3
99.3
99.9
99.8
99.8
99.8
99.8
99.7
99.4
r?.6
99.5
=9.5
24
Inlet
ppi CO
87Z 02
33.4
33.7
33.2
32.2
33.8
7* C
•Ji • w
"1.9
33.1
42.1
42.6
46.7
46.6
4,4.5
39.6
51.3
36.5
36.0
36.8
37.9
38.0
33.8
42.9
39.3
33.7
38.4
24
Outlet
ppi NOx
871 02
299.9
284.6
295.5
289.1
232.1
277.9
291.9
225.6
2:7.1
201.9
275.4
254.0
221.6
194.2
208. S
229.3
243.2
228.1
231.9
219.5
214.3
201.0
225.7
232.4
246.1
24
Coaients/Process Notes:
-------
1ILLBURY RESOURCE RECOVERY FACILITY / UNIT 2 - DATE: 7/29/83
Daily Data ausnarv
TIKE
1:00
2:00
3:00
4:00
:;00
= :00
7:vO
8:00
: : 00
10:00
11:00
12:00
13:00
14:00
15:00
16:00
1T;00
1B:OC
19:00
20:00
21:00
22:00
23:00
24:00
Daily
*ean:
Valid
Hours:
Inlet
ppa SD2
108.4
E2.6
72.1
;i.S
73.2
c7.7
77 , 4
-3.3
' S5.1
59.7
is. 5
133.1
S1.4
73.6
ii.O
59.6
:4.7
«8.3
93.9
75.3
63.0
°3.3
ES.7
n.S
77.0
24
Inlet
7.02
iO.l
10.2
10.3
10.7
10.4
10.6
10.2
9.9
10.6
10. E
10.3
11.6
11.4
10.3
10.5
10.7
11.6
10.6
9.8
10.0
10.7
10.7
10.7
11.0
10.6
24
Inlet
ppa CO
30.3
29.5
29.5
29.7
70.2
-%3 c
». i « k'
2?. 6
30.1
32.0
35.5
36.4
45.2
31.3
30.0
2S.4
27.0
32.3
25.6
17 T
fc/ . •.
-•: 7
" "i
27.9
27.3
30.3
24
Inlet
pps HC1
406.6
TTT 5
w / J . u
t!3.9
416.9
:65.5
520.3
i55.7
343.0
539.3
416.0
355.2
303.3
499.6
428. 2
402.3
440.2
415.5
440.3
513.9
*98.7
i20.4
401.7
375.3
366.5
458.8
24
Outlet
ppi 502
19.8
14.6
13.4
14.6
19.0
16.1
26.6
42.0
24.1
10.3
9.9
27. C
22.1
13.4
7.2
7.5
f>.6
6.4
19.5
11.4
3.1
19.4
13.2
12.6
16.0
24
Outlet
102
10.3
10.4
10.4
10.9
10.5
10.7
10.4
10.1
10.7
10.8
10.5
11.6
11.3
10. S
10.6
10.8
11. fc
10.7
10.0
10,2
10.7
10.7
10.7
10.9
10.7
24
Outlet
ppi NOx
174.7
170.7
170.8
158.6
169.1
163.1
Is7.9
164.1
149.1
152.4
170.4
146.7
167.1
190.1
174. i
174.1
151.4
164.3
136.5
194.3
175.=
163.7
170.9
160.0
168.0
24
Outlet i
ppi HC1
1.7
1.4
1.3
1.6
5.1
4.4
?.o
25.7
14.3
2.3
1.1
1.3
2.8
1.7
0.9
0.6
0.7
0.9
1.2
1 1
* A
.0
.0
.'1
. V
.9
3.5
24
Ipacity
I
2.5
2.6
3.6
4.3
3.4
3.5
3.3
2.9
2.4
1.9
1.8
1.8
1.7
1.9
1.8
1.9
1.6
1.5
1.7
1.9
1.9
1.3
1.3
2.8
2.3
24
-------
HILLSURY RESOURCE RECOVERY FACILITY / UNIT 2 - DATE: 7/29/88
Corrected Data Suiiarv
TIME
1:00
2:00
3:00
l;00
5:00
6:00
7:00
5:00
::00
10:00
11:00
12:00
13:00
14:00
15:00
16:00
17:00
13:00
19:00
20:00
31:00
22:00
23: 00
24:00
24-hour
Hear:
Valid
Hours:
Inlet
;pi 502
»71 02
139.5
107.3
94.5
101.9
"i.9
91.4
100.5
93.3
114.8
' 82.2
57.2
198.9
119.1
101.3
31.5
31.2
31.8
•55.2
117.6
°6.0
92.7
127.1
120.9
105.0
104.1
24
Outlet
-Dt 502
§71 02
26.0
19.3
17.7
20.3
25.4
21.9
35.2
54.1
32.8
14.2
13.2
40.4
32.0
18.4
9.7
10.3
9.9
S.7
24.9
14.8
11.0
26.4
:3.0
17.5
21.3
24
1 S02
Reaoval
Efficiency
81.4
82.0
81.2
30.1
73.3
76.0
o5.0
42.0
71.4
32. 7
34.8
79.7
73.1
El. 8
33.1
37.3
37.9
56.6
78.9
S4.6
53.1
"9.2
55.1
83.3
79.3
24
Inlet
ppa HCI
471 02
608.5
564.2
631.1
660.6
870.5
B16.5
-"0.5
1233.7
546.3
665.7
541.6
527.1
350.0
685.2
625.2
i97.5
722.1
691.7
748.3
739.5
666.2
436.5
5=4.7
598.3
717.4
24
Outlet
pot HCI
871 02
2.7
2.3
2.1
2.7
3.3
7.3
14.5
40.3
24.6
3.9
1.3
2.4
4.9
2.9
1.3
1.0
1.3
1.5
1.9
1.7
7
7
7
1.:
5.7
24
I HCI
Reioval
Efficiency
99.6
99.6
99.7
99.6
99.0
99.1
99.5
=6.7
97.1
99.4
99.7
99.6
=9.4
99.6
99.8
99.9
99.3
99.8
99.8
99.8
9°. 8
99.7
99.7
99.7
99.3
24
Inlet
paa CO
871 02
39.0
38.3
38.7
40.5
40.0
39.8
73.5
38.0
43.2
48.9
47.7
67.6
46.5
41.3
38.0
36.8
48.3
34.5
34.1
34.7
37.7
. / . k.
:s.o
38.3
41.1
•
24
Outlet
spa Nth
871 02
229.1
226.0
226.1
220.5
226.0
222.3
Tf ~
211.2
203.2
209.7
227.7
219.3
241.9
261.6
235.6
239.6
226.3
224.6
237.8
252.4
279.7
223.1
232.9
222.4
223.4
24
Coa«ents/Process Notes:
HC1 CEHS daily calibration check was conducted froi 10:45-11:22.
HC1 values for the 10:00-11:00 ar.i 11:00-12:00 hours are based
en 42 and 31 ainutes of valid data, rascectiveiy. Since effluent
7,easureaent data was collected for >50I of each hour, both hours
are valid data hours.
-------
-ILLBUfrY RESOURCE RECOVERY FACILITY / UNIT 2 -.DATE: 7/30/S8
Dailv fata Susiarv
TIJIE
1:00
2:00
7:00
4-00
= :30
i:00
7 : )0
S : 00
?: 00
10:00
11:00
12:00
13:00
14:00
15:00
It: 00
17:00
18:00
19:00
A.iVi
V I '. .-
• , ,V,
2:00
3:00
4:00
Daily
tean:
Valid
Hours:
Inlet
CBS =02
44.2
65. S
34.5
5S.B
66.9
:i.i
3A 1
.- v > ±
154.1
123.0
=7.4
SA T
ID. j
102.2
164.0
73.7
^2.0
26.5
26.1
9" 7
" T
33 7
-.* i > .
T~.7
127.4
113.4
52.5
^w
Inlet
102
11.1
10.7
10.6
10.9
0.6
O.E
1.4
0.4
11.7
10.4
10.6
10.1
10.1
9.5
9.2
9.4
?.6
9.8
C ?
?.4
10.2
10.1
10.7
10.3
23
Inlet
ppi CO
27.9
27.0
27.5
28. 6
27.4
28. 3
33.4
27.7
30.0
35.0
31.9
29.5
28.0
27.2
26.3
26.7
27,1
26.8
26.9
07 *\
t. > i -J
27.9
26.6
2E.4
28.4
?7
*.-.'
Inlet
ppi HC1
346.4
424.2
499.4
388.4
403.8
471. J
412.0
799.7
438. 0
420.0
525.1
365.9
448.0
459.7
506.3
535. B
559.1
385.1
726.3
1157.2
910.4
1078.1
573.3
388.6
* 7
^^. w
teV
Outlet
^02
11. 0
10.7
10.6
10.9
10.6
10.9
11.3
10.3
11.7
10.6
10.7
10.2
10.4
9.9
3.6
P '
9,9
10.0
9.5
7.5
1 :•> T
. .' . J
10.0
10.7
10.4
23
Outlet
ppa NOx
165.2
164.8
170.4
181.0
177.8
Ic7.3
I'l. 5
170.1
141.1
150.2
138.7
143.4
146.3
164.6
135.8
176.0
163.5
147.3
154.3
154.1
142.1
147. i
176.4
160.9
23
Outlet
ppn HC1
1.0
0.8
1.1
0.8
0.3
1.6
".0
5.0
11.3
i.i
1.0
1.0
1.7
1.3
9.7
4.5
2.6
12.2
5.1
12.6
12.4
35.4
1C. 8
5.9
77
»v'
Opacity
1
2.0
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.2
n
te • l
1.
1.6
1.2
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.2
i _n
1.4
1.6
1 c
* . ^
2.8
1.6
24
-------
NILLBURY RESOURCE RECOVERY FACILITY
Corrected Data Suiiarv
UNIT 2 - SATE: 7/30/88
HUE
1:00
2:00
3:00
4:00
5:00
6:00
7:00
5:00
7100
10:00
11:00
12:00
13:00
14:00
15:00
16:00
17:00
iB:00
1?:00
20:00
:i:00
22:00
:::oo
24:00
24-hour
lean:
Valid
Hours:
Inlet
ppi 5D2
•7X 02
91.1
89.7
114.0
81.7
90.3
97.9
117.2
217.2
1S3.9
128.9
Hi. 5
131.5
211.1
96.0
35.5
104.6
105.9
116.1
87. 6
109.4
100.9
liA.O
154.5
121.7
23
Outlet
ppa SC2
«7X 02
12.8
10.5
16.5
10.1
12.3
16.0
20.0
53.2
*6.5
32.3
26.8
36.2
49.2
27.9
53.8
39.0
39.7
62.6
40.5
•2.3
33.5
173.*
68.3
42.1
OT
4_'J
1 S02
Ssiovai
Efficiency
36.0
88.3
35.6
87.6
35.3
33.7
53.0
75.5
75.4
T5.0
76.9
72.4
76.7
70.9
37.2
52.7
62.5
46.1
53.9
42.5
42.1
55. S
69.3
MM
Alt
Inlet
;pa KC1
m 02
571.3
672.2
733.7
627.8
s33.6
754.5
701.0
1231.0
1120.9
308.3
547.6
670.5
sSi.S
699.4
753.0
799.7
1238.3
1012.0
1626.4
1375.2
1613.4
916.4
902.7
22
Outlet
??• HC1
m 02
1.7
1.3
1.3
1.4
1.3
2.7
3.5
3.0
20.8
1.6
1.6
2.7
2.0
14.6
6.3
4.0
19.0
7.6
13.7
19.8
55.1
17.9
9.7
V)
b^
Z HC1
Reioval
Efficiency
99.7
99.8
99.8
99. B
99.8
99.6
99.5
99.4
98.1
99.3
99.7
99.6
99.7
97.9
99.1
99.5
98,5
99.3
98.8
98.6
93.0
99.2
21
Inlet
ppi CO
271 02
39.6
36.8
37.1
39. S
37.0
33.9
4S.9
36.7
45.3
46.3
43.0
33.0
36.0
33.2
31.2
32.3
33.3
33.6
32.2
32.6
36.2
34.2
33.7
37.4
^T
Outlet
ppi NQx
«71 02
231.9
224.6
230.0
251.6
239.9
"!?•} S
i.^4. i tf
"AP ?
» .5 * w
223.1
213.2
202.7
189.0
136.3
193.7
203.0
228.6
213.4
206.6
138.5
188.1
137.9
1E6.3
1SB.2
240.4
213.4
17
*u
Coiients/Process Notes:
(Conducted sampling svstei bias check on Unit 2 ir.let and outlet
Anarad CEKS's during 09:00-10:00 hour following the dailv :ai
rsutine. Because the analyzer responses to these cai gas injections
are treated as effluent jreasureients. the «easureient data recoraed
during this hour are invalid. Mo 02 values were available to
correct the HC1 data to ppi HC1 8 71 02 fir this haur.
IHC1 data were lost during 11:00-12:00 hour; the dilution ratio of
the TECG "3 sa«plir,g systss Mas checked.
IDuring the 22:00-23:00 hour, the outlet SC2 analyzer essentially read
'.ke saie as the inlet S02 analvzer. Also, the outlet HC! analyzer
responses nere affscale ( >60 ppi i froi 22:42-23:00. No retoval
efficiencies nere calculated for this hour. *he boiler sperator
did not indicate any acnoriai process operatiGn.
-------
1ILLBURY SESOURCE RECOVERY FACILITY
Dsilv Data Euaaarv
/ L'NIT 2 - JATE: 7/31/98
Inlet Inlet
TIKE
1:00
2:00
3:00
4:00
5:00
i:00
7:00
5:00
9:00
10:00
11:00
12:00
13:00
14:00
15:00
It. -00
17:00
13:00
19:00
20:00
?i:')Q
22:00
23:00
24:00
Daily
(lean:
Valid
Hours:
pps SC2
44.9
45.7
63. 8
90.2
92.2
"0.2
i:.6
73.6
81.5
110.2
113.0
115.5
90.1
79.3
71.5
£3.6
59.3
44.0
52.9
C4.4
:v.2
;5.9
i" *
:3.2
73.5
24
";02
10.1
9.3
9.5
10.1
10.1
10.2
o_o
•0.3
11.1
11.1
11.4
1 « r,
4. A » V
11.3
10.7
10.7
11.3
10.7
•> 1 *
10.8
' i" 7
* * . o
' ' 7
10.7
• \ n
10.7
24
Inlet
pp> CO
27.9
27.0
26.5
26.1
26.7
27.4
26.5
27.0
27.6
29.5
30.2
28.9
30.4
30.3
29.9
29.6
29.4
29.3
29.2
27.0
29.2
30.4
29.4
30.1
23.6
24
Inlet
ppa HC1
476.8
499.7
351.0
549.5
540.4
483. 6
4-1.5
573.9
493.6
533.6
465.7
420.7
472.1
526.0
397.3
'25. 3
511.9
4<52.2
414.1
427.1
376. E
3t4.3
-51.5
539.6
493.9
24
Outlet
ops SG2
9.2
20.1
46.3
37.0
30.8
19.7
16.4
23.9
29.8
40.6
39.1
37.5
24.0
23.9
20.4
IT 1
19.2
19.2
11.9
9.7
t-J S
14.7
24.7
28.6
24.2
24
Outlet
rm
>« j* f
10.1
9.8
9.6
10.2
10.2
10.2
10.0
10.4
11.1
10.9
11.1
10.7
11.0
10.5
10.5
10.9
10.5
10. S
10.5
10.5
10. S
10.9
10.4
10.9
10.5
24
Outlet
i:a NOx
172.0
174.9
163.8
168.1
170.4
173.1
170.3
164.0
159.0
150.8
150.1
160.1
169.0
174.2
153.9
151.7
167.9
158.0
169.0
170.5
162.1
161.9
166.6
158.6
164.6
24
Outlet Opacity
ppa HC1
1.6
11.8
16.9
5.8
3.0
2.7
1.6
2.9
2.4
2.7
1.8
1.9
1.5
2.0
1.1
• 0.9
1.1
1.0
0.8
0.4
•:.4
0.4
1 t
3.4
2.9
24
Z
1.7
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.3
1.9
1.8
1.7
1.9
2,0
2.3
2.2
1.3
1.7
1.7
1.8
1 7
* i i
1.8
? ft
*. j V
2.0
2.0
3.2
1.9
24
-------
WILLBURY RESOURCE RECOVERY FACILITY / UNIT 2
Corrected Data Su
DATE: 7/31/88
Inlet Outlet 1 S02
pot S02 ;;• 502 Resoval
TIHE 871 02 §72 02 Efficiency
1:00
2:00
3:00
4:00
5:00
6:00
7:00
5:00
5:00
10:00
11:00
12:00
13:00
14:00
15:00
16:00
17:00
1S:OG
19:00
20:00
21:00
22:00
•3:00
24:00
57.8
57.2
33.9
116.1
118.7
91.2
32.9
103.1
115.6
156.3
165.3
162.2
130.5
108.1
97.4
121.0
30.8
90. S
72.7
60.5
34.5
30.1
91.7
83.4
11.8
25.2
57.0
48.1
40.0
25.6
20.9
31.6
42.3
56.4
55.5
51.1
33.7
31.9
27.3
32.9
24.3
26.4
15.9
11.6
•7 ">
20.4
32.7
39.4
79.5
56.0
32.1
58.6
66.3
71.9
74.8
:9.3
63.4
63.9
66.5
68.5
74.2
70.4
72.0
72.8
49.9
70.9
78.1
30.8
79.6
74.5
64.3
:2.S
Inlet Outlet I HC1
Dpi HC1 ppt HC1 Reioval
871 02 871 02 Efficiency
713.6
727.6
1206.5
822.4
308.7
730.5
:92.3
875.1
314.1
388.3
792.3
1:86.8
794.8
333.5
630.3
716.0
311.2
611. 6
710.7
676.8
615.2
607.0
731.3
982. 4
2.5
18.0
25.4
9.2
4.8
4.3
2.5
4.7
4.2
4.6
3.1
3.2
2.6
3.2
1.3
1.5
1.8
1.7
1.3
0.7
0.7
0.7
1.8
5.7
99.6
97.5
97.9
98.9
99.4
99.4
=9.6
99.5
59.5
99.5
99.6
99,5
59.7
99.6
99.7
99.8
99.8
99.8
99. B
99.9
99.9
99.9
9
-------
!1ILLBURY RESOURCE RECOVERY FACILITY
Cailv Data Suaaarv
UNIT 2 - DATE: 8/1/6
Inlet
TINE ops SQ2
1:00
2:00
3:00
4:00
•_' I 'v V
6:00
7:00
8:00
9:00
10:00
11:00
12:00
13:00
14:00
15:00
16:00 61.3
17:00 74.0
13:00 52.5
19:00 :3.5
20:00 f-2.2
:i:00 113.9
22:00 135.1
27:00 1:7.6
24:00 110.1
Daily
(lean: 104.5
Valid
Hours: 9
Iniet Inlet Inlet
202 pps CO ppi HC1
607.7
415.8
405.0
488.6
526.3
378.3
434.6
436.7
414.0
358.5
103.1
503.7
491.4
424.4
397.1
9.0 33.5 512.4
9.2 0.0 i£4.5
9.4 8.4 458.6
9.2 7.1 430.2
".1 5.9 415.3
='.s 5.3 'cl 6
•:.? 3.3 514.4
3.3 6.2 574.3
9.7 26.1 507.0
9.1 27.6 4S9.3
9 9 24
Outlet Outlet
??i S02 S02
4.1 9.5
9.9 9.6
8.3 9.7
9.4 9.4
9.2 9.4
23.1 9.1
40.8 =.3
36.7 9.1
19.6 9.9
18.3 9.4
9 9
Outlet
?p« NOx
185.7
138.1
186.3
139.1
ISO. 6
184.6
160.2
173.0
172.4
180.0
9
Outlet
ppi KC1
7.7
2.8
2.0
3.1
3.5
1.9
1.4
2.0
1.1
0.9
2.3
4.6
O.B
0.8
0.4
0.4
1.8
1.1
0.9
1 1
At*.
3.0
! « 7
6.0
3.4
2.7
24
Opacity
I
1.5
1 i
~ * w
1.7
.8
.6
.6
7
.8
2.8
1.3
9
-------
HILLBURY RESOURCE RECOVERY FACILITY /UNIT 2 - DATE: 8/1/83
Corrected Data Suaaary
Inlet Outlet I S02
ppa S02 opi 502 REcoval
TIME 871 02 871 02 Efficiency
1:00
2:00
7:00
t:00
5:00
i:00
8:00
?;00
10:00
11:00
12:00
13:00
14:00
15:00
16:00
17:00
13:00
19:00
20:00
1:00
2:00
3:00
24:00
24-hour
.lean:
Valid
Hours :
71.6
87.9
99.7
111.4
96.8
128.7
179.7
192.5
136.6
tn7 R
A»X .0
c
5.0
12.2
10.3
11.4
11.1
33.1
48.9
43.2
24.3
22.2
9
93.0
56.1
39.7
S9.8
53.5
74.3
•2.8
77.5
31.?
33.7
c
Inlet
ppa HC1 3
871 02
696.0
945.6
i44.5
594.3
568.8
869.4
1096.9
767.8
731.7
768.3
C
Outlet I MCI
oa HC1 Reioval
§71 02 Efficiency
0.6
2.7
1.7
1.3
1.8
4.3
16.5
3.6
5.2
4.7
9
99.9
99.7
99.7
99.8
99.7
99.5
a8.5
93.9
99.3
99.4
9
Inlet Outlet
ppt CO ppa NOx
871 02 871 02
39.1
35.6
34.3
32.2
30.5
23.8
29.5
30.1
32.4
32.5
S
226.4
231.4
231.2
228.6
21B.3
217.5
192.0
:o3.s
217.9
218.5
9
Coiaents/Process Notes:
The Hillburv CEFIS data aquisition systei coaouter hard disk crashed
at approsiaate!-/ 07:00. Data frcs lidnight tc 15:00 are not
available. At 09:45, 5 5DA noz:les Mere in operation.
At 15:46. 6 nozzles were in ooeration.
-------
HILLSUEY RESOURCE RECOVERY FACILITY
Daily Data suutarv
UNIT 2 - DATE: 9/2/83
In
TIKE ppi
1:00
2:00
3:00
4:00
f:00
6:00
7:00
S:00
9:00
10:00
11:00
12:00
13:00
11:00
15:00
16:CO
17:00
13:00
19:00
0:00
1:00
2:00 •
3:00
4:00
Daily
Mean:
Valid
riours:
et
302
36.6
=3.6
64.5
31.9
76.7
106.9
173.3
143. S
106.9
134.6
193.9
S2.3
122.6
i4.3
75.5
130.5
250.3
262.3
152.2
119.4
143.4
156.6
125.8
1*5.4
131.4
24
Inlet In
;02 ppa
9.4
9.9
10.1
10.3
9.4
10.0
9.5
9.5
10.1
O.Q
10.6
10.1
9.9
10.6
9.5
10.2
10.2
10.0
9.7
9.8
10. C
s.s
?.s
9.6
9.9
24
et
CO
26.7
26.8
27.7
27.4
"7
*7"* '
7?
27.9
29.6
30.5
29.2
29.1
32.3
24.9
24.5
29.9
27.0
24.8
23.6
"? <
11.6
21.4
22.3
21.5
26.4
24
Inlet
pp§ HC!
582.2
468.4
390.6
435.7
394.2
454.6
757.0
465.6
613.2
621.6
600.5
459.6
467.4
412.6
400. B
455.4
448.2
481.5
453.2
500.6
524.2
426.6
350.7
435.6
430.0
24
Outlet
PDI SG2
16.0
14.2
4.7
10.8
7.5
19.2
48.0
26.4
27.1
32.2
46.4
9.1
18.8
67.8
53.0
30.1
23.0
32.9
52.1
18.7
32.7
28.1
21
Outlet
7.02
9.7
10.2
10.3
10.5
9.7
10.2
9.7
9.7
10.2
9.9
10.5
10.1
10.5
10.1
10.0
9.3
9.9
|