EPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards
RTF, NC 27711
EMB Report 91-CCT-05
June 1991
Air
NESHAP
Cooling Towers
Chromium
Emission Test Report
National Institute of
Standards and Technology
Gaithersburg, Maryland
-------
EMISSION TEST REPORT
FOR
MINERAL DRIFT EMISSIONS
TESTING OF A COOLING TOWER
CHROMIUM NESHAPS DEVELOPMENT
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY
STEAM AND WATER CHILL PLANT
GAITHERSBURG, MARYLAND
U. S. EPA CONTRACT NO. 68D90055
WORK ASSIGNMENT NO. 25
ESD/TSD PROJECT NO. 85/02
APRIL 1991
Prepared By:
Samuel C. McClintock and William K. Kirk
Research and Analysis Division
Entropy Environmentalists, Inc.
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709
Prepared For:
Daniel G. Bivins
Emissions Measurement Branch
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711
-------
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We would like to extend our appreciation to Rick Marinshaw of Midwest
Research Institute, Ron Myers of EPA/ISB, and William DeWees of DEECO, Inc. for
their assistance in this project.
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION ....... 1-1
2.0 PROCESS AND CONTROL EQUIPMENT OPERATING PARAMETERS .......... 2-1
3.0 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 3-1
3.1 Percent Mineral Drift 3-1
3.2 Elements and Samples Used for the Analysis of Percent Drift . . . 3-3
3.3 Drift Rates Based on the Alkali and Alkali Earth Metals ..... 3-5
3.4 Drift Rates of Transition Metals 3-14
3.5 Drift Rates Based on Solubility 3-14
3.6 High-Volume vs. Low-Volume Metering Systems 3-19
3.7 Tell Tail vs. S-Type Pitot Tube for Nozzle Alignment in Cyclonic
Flow 3-20
3.8 Ambient Air Mineral Concentrations .... 3-21
3.9 Meteorological Data 3-21
3.10 Conclusions and Recommendations 3-21
4.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES AND TEST LOCATIONS . 4-1
4.1 Cooling Tower Cell Stack Sampling Locations . . 4-1
4.2 Recirculating Water Pipe 4-1
4.3 Mineral Concentration of Ambient and Cooling Tower Inlet Air . . 4-6
4.4 Ambient Air Meteorological Station 4-6
4.5 Determination of Volumetric Air Flow Rates 4-6
4.6 Cooling Tower Institute Draft Emission Measurement Method .... 4-7
4.7 CT Drift Sample Analysis 4-7
4.8 CT Drift Cooling Water Sampling and Analysis .... 4-9
5.0 DATA ASSESSMENT .............. 5-1
5.1 Cooling Tower Water 5-1
5.2 Ambient Air 5-2
5.3 Emission Samples ........ 5-2
6.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL ............. 6-1
6.1 Sampling QA/QC ..... 6-1
6.2 Analytical QA/QC ..... 6-2
7.0 REFERENCES ..... 7-1
Appendix A. Field Test Results and Drift Rate Calculation Tables . . I
Appendix B. Field and Analytical Data II
Appendix C. Test Request and Sampling/Analytical Procedures Ill
Appendix D. QA/QC Data IV
Appendix E. Process Data V
Appendix F. Test Program Participants ................ VI
-------
LIST OF TABLES
Table 3.1. Testing Schedule for NIST Cooling Tower 3-2
Table 3.2. Status of Elements used for Determination of Cooling Tower
Drift 3-4
Table 3.3. Summary of Percent Drift Results 3-6
Table 3.4. Summary of Emission Concentration Results ........... 3-9
Table 3.5. Summary of Results for Cooling Water Analysis 3-12
Table 3.6. Comparison of High and Low-Volume Sampling Systems 3-20
Table 3.7. Tell-Tail vs. Pitot Tube for Nozzle Alignment 3-22
Table 3.8. Ambient Air Mineral Concentration - July 10-12, 1990 .... 3-23
Table 3.9. Meteorological Conditions for Dulles International
Airport; July 9-12, 1990 3-24
Table 4.1. Schedule of Sampling Methods and Locations 4-2
Table 6.1. Meter Box Calibration Audit 6-1
iv
-------
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 2-1. Schematic of Marley Comfort cooling tower with
Hunters D-15 high-efficiency drift eliminators 2-3
Figure 3-1. Average percent drift for alkali/alkali earth
elements 3-13
Figure 3-2. Day-to-day effects on percent drift. . . ..... 3-15
Figure 3-3. Cell effects on percent drift. ...... 3-16
Figure 3-4. Comparison of percent drift of alkali/alkali earth
elements and transition elements. ............. 3-17
Figure 3-5. Percent drift versus solubility . . .... 3-18
Figure 4-1. Schedule of sampling methods and locations 4-3
Figure 4-2. Cutaway view of the fan cell deck 4-4
Figure 4-3. Top view of a fan cell showing the sampling axes and
traverse points 4-5
Figure 4-4. Schematic of CTD draft method sampling train 4-8
Figure 4-5. Schematic of sample preparation and analysis for
high-volume CTD train 4-10
Figure 4-6. Schematic of sample preparation and analysis for low-
volume CTD train .............. 4-11
Figure 4-7. Schematic of sample preparation and analysis for cooling water
samples . 4-13
-------
1.0 INTRODUCTION
During the week of July 13 to 19, 1990, Entropy Environmentalists, Inc.
(Entropy) conducted an emission measurement program on a comfort cooling tower
at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST, formerly NBS) in
Gaithersburg, Maryland. The testing program was conducted under contract to the
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Emission Measurement Branch (EMB)
(Contract No. 68D90055, Work Assignment No. 25).
The emission test program at NIST included testing to: (1) determine the
accuracy and the precision of the EPA's draft Cooling Tower Drift Emission Test
Method1 (CT Drift Method) and (2) provide supporting data for a possible
chromium National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP).
The draft CT Drift Method involves the isokinetic collection of cooling tower
drift. Cooling tower drift emissions are expressed as the percent of water
flow through the tower that exits the fan cell in the form of water droplets
and aerosols. These drift emissions are collected in an acidic impinger
solution which is analyzed for elements (minerals) present and detectable by
inductively-coupled argon plasma spectroscopy (ICAP). The draft CT Drift
Method assumes that the relative mineral concentrations present in the cooling
water are the same as for the cooling tower drift captured using the draft
method. By identifying several common indicator minerals present in the
cooling tower drift, the other minerals and their relative concentrations can
be extrapolated from the results of a cooling water sample analysis. When
these calculated values are linked to water flow rates, mineral emission rates
can be determined for any cooling water constituent of interest.
The Marley-designed, comfort cooling tower used primarily for air
conditioning was chosen for testing because it is outfitted with Munters D-15
high-efficiency drift eliminators (HEDE's). The tower tested was in good
condition and operating under design load. In addition, the tower design
allowed easy access to the fan cell outlets and the testing personnel were able
to make unobstructed cell traverses. The tower is located near Building 302 of
the NIST steam and water chill plant. A more detailed description of the
cooling tower is presented in Section 2.0 of this report.
Coordinating the testing program were the following key personnel: Mr.
Bill Kirk, the Entropy Project Manager; Mr. Dan Bivins of the U.S. EPA,
1-1
-------
Emission Measurement Branch (EMB), Project Officer; Mr. Ron Myers of the U.S.
EPA, Industrial Studies Branch (ISB), Project Officer; and Mr. Allen Federline,
Site Manager, National Institute of Standards and Technology. Other testing
program participants are listed in Appendix F.
This interim report covers the first of three similar testing programs to
be conducted to characterize cooling tower emissions. Subsequent testing will
be similarly reported. At the conclusion of all the testing programs, a final
report will summarize the data collected, and the findings will be used to
prepare a draft method for quantifying cooling tower mineral drift emissions.
The test results are reported and discussed in Section 3.0. Section 4.0
outlines the sampling procedures and the testing locations. Data assessment is
discussed in Section 5.0, followed by Quality Assurance and Quality Control in
Section 6.0. Appendix A to this document contains the test results and example
calculations. Appendix B contains the field and analytical data. Appendix C
presents the sampling and analytical procedures used. Calibration and quality
assurance data are contained in Appendix D. Process data are found in Appendix
E, and the test participants and observers are presented in Appendix F.
1-2
-------
2.0 PROCESS AND CONTROL EQUIPMENT OPERATING PARAMETERS
The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) operates a
Marley-designed comfort cooling tower built by the Foster Wheeler Company at
their facility in Gaithersburg, Maryland. The cooling tower provides comfort
cooling as well as cooling for laboratory ovens, lasers, etc. The cooling
tower consists of four crossflow sections, all equipped with Munters
D-15 high-efficiency drift eliminators. Each section includes a 30-foot
diameter fan cell stack with a fan driven by a separate motor. The fan motors
can be set at either a high or low speed. The motors on the cells being tested
were set at the high speed throughout the testing program.
The cooling water flow rate to each section during testing was
approximately 7930 gallons-per-minute (gpm). The water is pumped through a
single riser to a distribution manifold, and gravity fed to a covered water
trough under the cooling tower decking. The evaporation rate for the cooling
tower was approximately 0.25 million gallons per day (mgd).
The tower was built in 1966. Recently, new decking, fans, stacks,
windwalls, and mist eliminators have been installed. Access to the top of the
tower is by stairs, and electrica] power is accessible on the top of the
cooling tower deck. The specific dimensions and other pertinent information
for the cooling tower are listed below:
Height to top of tower, feet: 32.0
Height from top of tower to top of fan stack, feet: 6.0
Number of riser cells: 4
Number of fan cells: 4
Dimension of tower (width x length), feet: 44 x 66
Diameter of cell stacks, feet: 22.0
Airflow capacity of each fan, cfm (highest speed): =1,500,000
Recirculating water flow rate, each cell, mgd: 12.67
The cooling -tower water reservoir holds approximately 360,000 gallons,
with approximately 250,000 gallons of makeup water added each day. The cooling
water treatment program involves using a biocide solution containing disodium
cyanodithioimdocarbonate (7.35%) and potassium methyldithiocarbonate (10.15%)
2-1
-------
added at a rate of 6.5 gallons per week. Molybdates and polyacrylates are also
used to treat the cooling water. Nutmeg Chemical Company in New Haven,
Connecticut supplies the water treatment chemicals and services the cooling
tower. Figure 2-1 is a schematic of the NIST cooling tower.
The cooling tower operating parameters were monitored during the emission
testing by Mr. Ron Myers of ISB, and Mr. Dan Bivins of EMB, U. S. EPA.
Recirculating water flow rate in the riser pipes, airflow, inlet and outlet
water temperatures, blowdown, and makeup water flow rates were monitored by
plant technicians and logged using a process computer. These two resources
provided the database for the process parameters used in the final drift
calculations. Meteorological data collected included ambient wet bulb and dry
bulb temperatures, ambient humidity, wind speed, and wind direction. The
general guidelines for Cooling Tower Institute thermal efficiency and drift
testing were followed whenever possible (see Appendix C).
2-2
-------
ro
i
OJ
WATER HEADERS
AND
DISTRIBUTION
BASINS
N
t
National Bureau of Standards
Steam and Water Chill Plant
Gaithersburg, Maryland
BLOW
DOWN
LINE
COMFORT COOLING TOWER
WITH HIGH-EFFICIENCY
DRIFT ELIMINATORS
3644 3/91
Figure 2-1. Schematic of Marley Comfort cooling tower with Munters D-15 high efficiency drift eliminators.
-------
3.0 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
A field testing program was conducted to determine the mass emission
rates, and drift rates in percent, of thirty-two elements (minerals) from four
fan cells with high-efficiency drift eliminators on a steam and chill plant
cooling tower. The EPA's Draft CT Drift Method was used to determine the
emission rates. This method uses a modified EPA Method 13B-type impinger
train, with a back-up filter, attached to a high-volume sampling system. Table
3-1 presents the test schedule.
Twelve of the thirty-two target elements were detected in both the cooling
water and in the emission samples: calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), sodium (Na),
strontium (Sr), titanium (Ti), manganese (Mn), aluminum (Al), zinc (Zn),
chromium (Cr), iron (Fe), copper (Cu) and boron (B). The first four elements
Ca, Mg, Na, Sr - are commonly used to measure emission rates of cooling
towers.2'3 The average percent mineral drift calculated for these four
elements, 0.007 percent, was consistent with previous test data for cooling
towers equipped with high-efficiency drift eliminators (see Section 3.3) ,2'3'4'5
Sampling was conducted using both high-volume and low-volume metering
systems to collect the emission samples. The drift rates determined by using
the two systems were not statistically different (see Section 3.6).
When conducting isokinetic sampling at cooling towers, an S-type pitot is
typically used to align the sampling nozzle under cyclonic flow conditions.
During this field test, a tell-tail, a narrow pennant used to indicate wind
direction at the top of a sailboat mast, was attached near the nozzle to
visually align the sampling nozzle prior to final adjustment using the pitot-
tube. Nozzle angles determined by using the two techniques were not
statistically different (see Section 3.7).
3.1 PERCENT MINERAL DRIFT
Percent mineral drift is a widely accepted unit used for characterizing
cooling tower emissions. It is determined by analyzing both the stack
emissions and cooling water for one or more elements. Percent mineral drift is
defined as the percent of elements or contaminants in the cooling tower water
that exit the cooling tower in the form of air emissions:
3-1
-------
TABLE 3.1. TESTING SCHEDULE FOR NIST COOLING TOWER
Date
(1990)
7/09
7/10
7/11
7/12
Sample
Type
CTD* Hi Vol
CTD Lo Vol
CTD Hi Vol
CTD Lo Vol
CTD Hi Vol
CTD Lo Vol
CTD Hi Vol
CTD Lo Vol
Fan Cell 1
Run
No.
Cl-CTD-1
Cl-CTD-2
Test
Time
0932-1904
0930-1904
Fan Cell 2
Run
No.
C2-CTD-1*
C2-CTD-2
C2-CTD-3
C2-CTD-4
C2-CTD-5
C2-CTD-6
C2-CTD-7
C2-CTD-8
Test
Time
1452-2036
1450-2034
0927-1902
0925-1900
0937-1629
0935-1637
0917-1541
0915-1939
Fan Cell 3
Run
No.
C3-CTD-1
C3-CTD-2
C3-CTD-3
C3-CTD-4
Test
Time
1454-2028
1452-2025
0934-1535
0932-1540
Fan Cell 4
Run
No.
C4-CTD-1
C4-CTD-2
Test
Time
0919-1627
0918-1626
*CTD is the abbreviation for the CT Drift Method.
-------
Emission Cone, (mg/dscm) x fan cell flow (dscm/hr)
Percent Drift = x 100
Water Cone. (mg/L) x water flow (L/hr)
Assuming that the relative concentrations present in the cooling water are the
same as for the drift emissions, the percent drift for one element can be used
to calculate mass emission rates for all elements present in the cooling water.
Emission concentrations were determined by isokinetically sampling the
emissions 'at the exit stack of the cooling tower. Two sample portions were
collected: (1) the impinger reagent and rinses of the impinger train and
sampling probe and (2) the backup filter placed prior to the silica gel
impinger. Analysis of these two portions yielded a total catch for each
element, which was divided by the volume of the gas sampled.
Concentrations of the target elements were determined for a composite
sample of cooling tower water consisting of periodic grab samples collected
while isokinetic sampling was in progress. Stack flow rates were determined
using the pitot tube pressures and alignment angles recorded for the sampling
traverse of the fan cell stack. Water flow rates were determined from readings
taken by the cooling tower personnel, and included corrections for auxiliary
flows such as blowdown rates and makeup water.
3.2 ELEMENTS AND SAMPLES USED FOR THE ANALYSIS OF PERCENT DRIFT
Thirty-two target elements were selected for analysis in the cooling tower
water and drift emission samples (see Table 3.2). These target elements were
analyzed using inductively-coupled argon plasmography (ICAP) by two separate
laboratories, Research Triangle Institute (RTI) and University of Missouri (U
of MO). The analytical results reported by the University of Missouri were
consistently higher (averaging 12% higher) than those reported by the Research
Triangle Institute (see results in Appendix A). The same trend was seen for
analysis of audit samples, with U of MO reporting values 1 percent to 5 percent
higher than those of RTI, but closer to the actual audit values (see Appendix A
and Section 6.2). With few exceptions, however, the differences in the data
were not significant.
3-3
-------
TABLE 3.2. STATUS OF ELEMENTS USED FOR DETERMINATION OF COOLING TOWER DRIFT
Thirty-two
Target
Elements
Silver
Aluminum
Arsenic
Boron
Barium
Beryl 1 ium
Bismuth
Calcium
Cadmium
Cobalt
Chromium
Copper
Iron
Potassium
Tungsten
Lithium
Antimony
Magnesium
Manganese
Sodium
Molybdenum
Phosphorous
Lead
Nickel
Selenium
Sil icon
Tin
Strontium
Titanium
Thall ium
Vanadium
Zinc
Elements
Not
Detected
Silver
Arsenic
Beryl 1 ium
Bismuth
Cadmium
Cobalt
Tungsten
Lithium
Antimony
Lead
Nickel
Selenium
Sil icon
Tin
Thai 1 i urn
Vanadium
Elements
Within 5X of
Det. Limit
Barium
Potassium
Molybdenum
Phosphorous
Elements
Used for
Analysis
Calcium
Magnesium
Sodium
Strontium
Titanium
Manganese
Aluminum
Zinc
Chromium
Iron
Copper
Boron
(Concentration in
excess of 5X the
detection limit)
Alkali and
Alkali Earth
Metals
Transition
Metals
Semimetal
3-4
-------
Of the 32 elements analyzed, 16 were not detectable by ICAP (see Table
3.2). Four elements yielded inconclusive results because their concentration
levels were less than five times the analytical detection limit. The remaining
12 elements were used to establish drift rates, emission concentrations, and
for statistical comparisons: calcium, magnesium, sodium, strontium, titanium,
manganese, aluminum, zinc, chromium, iron, copper and boron (see Tables 3.3 and
3.4). The results of the cooling water analyses conducted by U of MO (see
Table 3.5) were used to calculate the drift rates presented. Calcium,
magnesium, sodium, and strontium, are highly-reactive, alkali and alkali earth
metals and are the elements commonly used to determine cooling tower emission
rates.2'3 Transition metals have-valence electrons in more than one shell and
are noted for their variability in oxidation state; the transition and
semimetals (see Table 3.4) have undergone only limited study in relation to
cooling tower emissions testing.2
During the last two days of the field test (Runs 3 and 4), the sample
lines in the CT Drift trains used to sample Fan Cell 2 were changed from Teflon
to PVC. Samples from these trains showed consistently higher concentrations,
ranging from 50 percent to 400 percent higher, for many of the target elements.
These data were eliminated from subsequent statistical analysis and were not
used in establishing drift rates.
3.3 DRIFT RATES BASED ON THE ALKALI AND ALKALI EARTH METALS
The alkali and alkali earth metals have been commonly used as indicator
elements to calculate cooling tower drift emissions because of their relatively
high concentration in both the cooling water and drift emissions. The drift
rates calculated using the four alkali/alkali earth elements detected for this
field test ranged from 0.001 percent to 0.026 percent, with an average over all
samples of 0.007 percent (see Figure 3-1).
This drift rate compared favorably with previously reported cooling tower
drift values, which ranged from 0.002 percent to 0.01 percent for the same
elements emitted from cooling towers using high-efficiency drift eliminators.2
The data from the current test are improved, however, in relation to the
variability expressed in terms of the relative standard deviation (RSD). Past
attempts to establish drift rates for cooling towers have yielded RSD's over
3-5
-------
Table 3.3. Summary of percent Drift Results, Alkali/Alkali Earth Metals
Fan Type Run Date
No. No.
2 CTI/HI 1 7/09/90
2 CTI/LO 2
3 CTI/HI 1
3 CTI/LO 2
2 CTI/HI 3 7/10/90
2 CTI/LO 4
1 CTI/HI 1
1 CTI/LO 2
2 CTI/HI 5 7/11/90
2 CTI/LO 6
3 CTI/HI 3*
3 CTI/LO 4*
2 CTI/HI 7 7/12/90
2 CTI/LO 8
4 CTI/HI 1 *
4 CTI/LO 2*
Average
Rel. Std. Dev.
Percent Drift
Calcium
UoM RTI
0.006 0.001
0.002
0.009 0.002
0.010
0.005 0.001
0.001
0.005 0.002
0.007
0.006 0.002
0.001
0.006 0.001
0.002
0.007 0.002
27% 28%
Magnesium
UoM RTI
0.007 0.007
0.002
0.011 0.010
0.009
0.006 0.005
0.007
0.005 0.008
0.008
0.004 0.004
0.010
0.007 0.006
0.011
0.007 0.007
31% 41%
Sodium
UoM RTI
0.016 0.002
0.002
0.021 0.003
0.026
0.01 1 0.002
0.002
0.008 0.001
0.014
0.005 0.001
0.001
0.008 0.001
0.002
0.014 0.002
52% 42%
Strontium
UoM RTI
0.010 0.009
0.012
0.012 0.011
0.014
0.009 0.006
0.007
0.004 0.005
0.010
0.006 0.005
0.009
0.006 0.005
0.012
0.009 0.008
36% 34%
Boron
RTI
0.005
0.007
0.011
0.007
0.010
0.005
0.013
0.004
0.011
0.008
41%
(jO
CTl
Average Overall Percent Drift
0.007
*NOTE: Contamination was apparent in some elements of these runs: instead of selective use of numbers, all the
data from these sample trains were note used in this report.
-------
Table 3.3. Summary of Percent Drift Results, Transition Elements
Fan Type Run Date
No. No.
2 CTI/HI 1 7/09/90
2 CTI/LO 2
3 CTI/HI 1
3 CTI/LO 2
2 CTI/HI 3 7/10/90
2 CTI/LO 4
1 CTI/HI 1
1 CTI/LO 2
2 CTI/HI 5 7/11/90
2 CTI/LO 6
3 CTI/HI 3
3 CTI/LO 4
2 CTI/HI 7 7/12/90
2 CTI/LO 8
4 CTI/HI 1
4 CTI/LO 2
Average
Rel. Std. Dev.
Percent Drift
Aluminum
UoM RTI
6.213 2.574
1.780
2.086 3.081
6.587
6.870 7,424
6.505
5.087 3.252
4.485
13.385 8.626
16.480
5.041 5.098
6.219 6.091
53% 75%
Chromium
UoM RTI
7.610 1.998
2.318
4.922 2.372
3.564
4.902 5.957
5.188
1 .268 2.374
5.465
13.515 3.872
3.983
6.576
5.892 3.848
66% 45%
Copper
UoM RTI
1.079 0.817
1.020
1 .078 0.989
1.325
0.424 0.346
0.465
0.272 0.341
0.749
1.394 0.500
0.683
1 .506 0.780
0.808
0.978 0.675
47% 37%
Iron
UoM RTI
1 .668 1 .032
1.067
1.419 1.448
1.353
1.807 2.159
2.062
1 .228 1 .884
5.382
6.129 2.666
8.673
6.792
2.712 3.087
77% 88%
CO
I
-------
Table 3.3. Summary of Percent Drift Results, Transition Elements
Fan Type Run Date
No. No.
2 CTI/HI 1 7/09/90
2 CTI/LO 2
3 CTI/HI 1
3 CTI/LO 2
2 CTI/HI 3 7/10/90
2 CTI/LO 4
1 CTI/HI 1
1 CTI/LO 2
2 CTI/HI 5 7/11/90
2 CTI/LO 6
3 CTI/HI 3
3 CTI/LO 4
2 CTI/HI 7 7/12/90
2 CTI/LO 8
4 CTI/HI 1
4 CTI/LO 2
Average
Rel. Std. Dev.
Percent Drift
Manganese
UoM RTI
2.492 2.068
2.089 1 .544
15.865
4.085 3.158
0.644
6.113 9.257
1.613
2.016 1.670
0.711
6.711 1.406
0.989
5.123 2.383
93% 1 1 3%
Titanium
UoM RTI
1.179 1.108
0.598
0.484
0.494 0.579
1.299
0.571 0.782
0.179 0.256
0.532
0.517 0.394
3.083
0.571 0.959
58% 90%
Zinc
UoM RTI
2.768 2.764
2.901
4.232 3.254
4.790
1 .251 1 .002
3.295
1 .267 0.724
0.642
12.205
6.688 5.118
10.078
3.091 4.593
72% 86%
to
00
-------
Table 3.4. Summary of Emission Concentration Results, Alkali/Alkali Earth Metals
Fan Type Run Date
No. No.
2 CTI/HI 1 7/09/90
2 CTI/LO 2
3 CTI/HI 1
3 CTI/LO 2
2 CTI/HI 3 7/10/90
2 CTI/LO 4
1 CTI/HI 1
1 CTI/LO 2
2 CTI/HI 5 7/11/90
2 CTI/LO 6
3 CTI/HI 3*
3 CTI/LO 4*
2 CTI/HI 7 7/12/90
2 CTI/LO 8
4 CTI/HI 1*
4 CTI/LO 2*
Average
Rel. Std. Dev.
Concentration (ug/DSCM)
Calcium
UoM RTI
18.81 3.60
4.83
23.14 6.45
26.71
10.79 3.32
2.62
10.95 4.25
15.42
11.05 3.12
2.70
13.81 2.29
4.20
16.34 3.74
37% 33%
Magnesium
UoM RTI
6.11 5.77
1.74
8.83 7.95
7.54
4.25 3.59
5.02
3.06 4.79
5.41
2.72 2.14
6.12
5.02 4.11
7.34
5.37 4.86
39% 42%
Sodium
UoM RTI
27.22 2.54
3.98
31 .43 4.54
39.05
14.34 2.13
2.72
9.60 1.73
16.92
6.33 1.04
1.60
10.68 0.89
1.95
19.45 2.31
60% 51 %
Strontium
UoM RTI
0.16 0.15
0.19
0.18 0.16
0.20
0.11 0.08
0.09
0.05 0.06
0.12
0.07 0.06
0.11
0.08 0.06
0.15
0.12 0.11
45% 43%
Boron
RTI
0.37
0.51
0.74
0.49
0.66
0.33
0.88
0.28
0.86
0.57
40%
OJ
I
*NOTE: Contamination was apparent in some elements of these runs: instead of selective use of numbers, all the
data from these sample trains were not used in this report.
-------
Table 3.4. Summary of Emission Concentration Results, Transition Elements
Fan Type Run Date
No. No.
2 CTI/HI 1 7/09/90
2 CTI/LO 2
3 CTI/HI 1
3 CTI/LO 2
2 CTI/HI 3 7/10/90
2 CTI/LO 4
1 CTI/HI 1
1 CTI/LO 2
2 CTI/HI 5 7/11/90
2 CTI/LO 6
3 CTI/HI 3
3 CTI/LO 4
2 CTI/HI 7 7/12/90
2 CTI/LO 8
4 CTI/HI 1
4 CTI/LO 2
Average
Pel. Std. Dev.
Concentration (ug/DSCM)
Aluminum
UoM RTI
10.27 4.26
2.94
3.12 4.61
9.83
4.18 4.52
3.96
2.82 1.80
2.49
5.45 3.51
6.71
1 .70 1 .72
4.98 3.78
67% 41%
Chromium
UoM RTI
1.05 0.28
0.32
0.62 0.30
0.45
0.21 0.26
0.23
0.05 0.09
0.22
0.70 0.20
0.21
0.21
0.29
0.47 0.24
73% 28%
Copper
UoM RTI
0.91 0.69
0.86
0.83 0.76
1.01
0.17 0.14
0.18
0.10 0.12
0.27
0.30 0.11
0.15
0.38 0.20
0.20
0.50 0.34
73% 88%
Iron
UoM RTI
5.91 3.66
3.78
4.55 4.65
4.32
2.03 2.43
2.32
1.26 1.93
5.51
3.98 1.71
5.57
2.68
6.35
3.94 3.51
44% 45%
CO
t'
o
-------
Table 3.4. Summary of Emission Concentration Results, Transition Elements
Fan Type Run Date
No. No.
2 CTI/HI 1 7/09/90
2 CTI/LO 2
3 CTI/HI 1
3 CTI/LO 2
2 CTI/HI 3 7/10/90
2 CTI/LO 4
1 CTI/HI 1
1 CTI/LO 2
2 CTI/HI 5 7/11/90
2 CTI/LO 6
3 CTI/HI 3
3 CTI/LO 4
2 CTI/HI 7 7/12/90
2 CTI/LO 8
4 CTI/HI 1
4 CTI/LO 2
Average
Rel. Std. Dev.
Concentration (ug/DSCM)
Manganese
UoM RTI
0.81 0.67
0.62 0.46
0.61 0.47
0.10
0.83 1 .26
0.22
0.25 0.21
0.09
0.88 0.18
0.13
0.60 0.40
45% 96%
Titanium
UoM RTI
0.65 0.61
0.33
0.24
0.21 0.25
0.56
0.22 0.31
2.71
0.07 0.10
0.20
0.21 0.16
1.27
0.62 0.42
1 53% 86%
Zinc
UoM RTI
2.61 2.61
2.74
3.62 2.78
4.08
0.64 0.52
1.70
0.60 0.34
0.30
2.24 1 .69
1.05
0.63 0.48
0.95
1.84 1.49
82% 65%
-------
TABLE 3.5. SUMMARY OF RESULTS FOR COOLING WATER ANALYSIS
Run
No.*
Run 1
Run 2
Run 3
Run 4
Run
No.*
Run 1
Run 2
Run 3
Run 4
Run
No.*
Run 1
Run 2
Run 3
Run 4
Calcium
Cone. %
(ppm) Fil
369.27
378.28
357.97
370.80
Aluminum
Cone. %
(ppm) Fil
0.203
0.098
0.071
0.054
Iron
Cone. %
(ppm) Fil
0.435
0.181
0.112
0.063
in
trate
99.8
99.7
99.7
99.8
in
trate
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
in
trate
21.2
33.1
26.8
0.0
Magnesium
Cone.
(ppm)
109.29
113.13
108.18
111.14
% in
Filtrate
99.7
99.9
99.8
99.9
Boron
Cone.
(ppm)
9.333
11.498
12.256
12.000
% in
Filtrate
99.6
99.1
98.7
98.3
Manganese
Cone.
(ppm)
0.040
0.024
0.022
0.021
% in
Filtrate
74.3
85.0
91.4
96.4
Sodium
Cone. %
(ppm) Fil
205.32
213.20
203.33
211.32
Chromium
Cone. %
(ppm) Fil
0.017
0.007
0.009
0.005
Titanium
Cone. %
(ppm) Fil
0.068
0.069
0.066
0.066
in
trate
99.8
99.9
99.8
99.8
in
trate
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
in
trate
81.3
84.3
83.2
92.9
Stronti
urn
Cone. % in
(ppm) Filtrate
2.03
2.09
1.99
2.08
Copper
Cone. %
(ppm) Fi
0.104
0.064
0.038
0.040
Zinc
Cone. %
(ppm) Fi
0.116
0.083
0.015
0.015
99.0
99.7
99.8
99.8
in
Itrate
85.0
92.0
78.5
86.9
in
Itrate
42.4
48.3
0.0
0.0
*In the case of cooling tower water samples, the run number reflects the test day the
sample was collected.
-------
0.008-1
Calcium Magnesium Sodium Strontium Boron
ELEMENTS (Semimetal)
Figure 3-1. Average percent drift for alkali/alkali earth elements.
3-13
-------
200 percent. The RSD's calculated for the alkali/alkali earth elements for
this study ranged from 27 percent to 52 percent. As depicted in Figure 3-2,
the day-to-day (or run-to-run) differences were usually within one standard
deviation of the average.
Figure 3-3 provides a graphical view of the cell effects. Fan Cell 2 was
tested during all four runs. Data from Fan Cell 3, collected on day 1, and
data from Fan Cell 1, collected on day 2, were not statistically different from
data collected on Fan Cell 2 during those same days.
3.4 DRIFT RATES OF TRANSITION METALS
Figure 3-4 presents drift rates based on the twelve elements analyzed.
The average drift rate for the seven transition metals, 3.3 percent, is
approximately 500 times greater than that for the four alkali metals, which is
0.007 percent. Limited data from previous cooling tower drift tests indicate
that this trend has been noted before.2 However, because previous efforts
included only one or two of these elements, the high drift rates were often
eliminated as outliers.2
The data and experimental procedures were reexamined to determine if there
is some inherent reason for this difference. After eliminating data from
filters that had high blank values, and correcting for ambient air
concentrations of the relevant elements, drift rates based on the transition
metals are still significantly higher than those based on the alkali metals.
No reason for this difference can be postulated. The relative standard
deviations calculated for the transition elements were slightly higher than for
the alkali and alkali earth elements, averaging about 63%.
3.5 DRIFT RATES BASED ON SOLUBILITY
There is a strong inverse correlation between the solubility of the
elements detected in the cooling water and the drift rate calculated from their
concentration in the emission samples. Figure 3-5 graphically displays the
average percent mineral concentration in the filtrate (solubility), from Table
3.5, with the average percent drift results presented in Table 3.3. The
relationship between percent drift and solubility demonstrates that as the
solubility of an element increases, the contribution it makes to the cooling
3-14
-------
c
0)
u
0.012-
0.011-
0.010-
0.009-
0.008-
0.007-
0.006-
0.005-
0.004-
Q\
0.003^
0.002-
^~~~~^~^x ^^^""^
^-^-
III!
Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4
-- Calcium -±- Magnesium -^- Sodium
-H- Strontium -X- Boron
Figure 3-2. Day-to-day effects on percent drift.
3-15
-------
0.018-
0.016-
0.014-
^ 0.012-
Q
'c
-------
7.0-r
Na Sr Ca Mg
0.93 0.95 1.00 1.31 1.54 1.55 1.61 1.65 1.66 1.83 1.90 2.04
0.0
Electronegativity
Figure 3-4. Comparison of percent drift of alkali/alkali earth elements and
transition elements.
3-17
-------
0 10
100
Percent Soluble in Cooling Water
B
Sr
Ca
Mg
Na
Figure 3-5. Percent drift versus solubility.
3-18
-------
tower drift decreases. The strong inverse relationship between solubility and
tower drift demonstrated by these data suggests that solubility must be
considered in the selection of indicator or surrogate elements.
Previous testing programs have assumed a one-to-one relationship between
concentration of the chemical species contained in the cooling water and in the
cooling tower drift emissions and have not considered the relationship of
solubility to drift emissions.5 In the test reported in Reference 4, the
recirculating water was spiked with lithium bromide (LiBr) as a surrogate
indicator for use in determining the cooling tower drift rate. During the
testing, the LiBr levels in the cooling water were monitored using a specific
ion electrode. Calculated drift rates from this test of 0.005 percent are
consistent with drift rates from the NIST testing presented in Section 3.3 of
this report.5 If the earlier data were plotted on Figure 3-5, the high
solubility of the LiBr and the drift rate of 0.005 percent would be in
agreement with current results. Subsequent testing programs will further
investigate this relationship and the results will be included in the final
summary report.
3.6 HIGH-VOLUME VS. LOW-VOLUME METERING SYSTEMS
The CT Drift draft method, because of the relatively low concentrations of
emissions from cooling towers, specifies use of a high-volume sample metering
system. The high-volume metering system is capable of sampling at four times
the rate of a standard Method 5 metering system.
For this test program, paired CT Drift trains were operated, one with the
required high-volume metering system and one with a typical Method 5 (low-
volume) metering system. In this way, the feasibility of substituting the more
readily available low-volume system could be assessed.
Table 3.6 presents a side-by-side comparison of drift emission results
obtained using the high- and low-volume systems to sample the alkali metals.
The differences in percent drift are well within the standard deviation of all
the data, and no trends were observed in either the percent drift or the
relative standard deviation of the data.
3-19
-------
TABLE 3.6. COMPARISON OF HIGH AND LOW-VOLUME SAMPLING SYSTEMS
Element
Calcium
Magnesium
Sodium
Stronti urn
Avg. Percent Drift
High-Volume System
0.00237
0.00383
0.00493
0.00424
Low-Volume
0.00201
0.00436
0.00437
0.00565
System
3.7 TELL TAIL VS. S-TYPE PITOT TUBE FOR NOZZLE ALIGNMENT IN CYCLONIC FLOW
The draft CT Drift method specifies alignment of the sampling nozzle into
the cyclonic flow commonly found in cooling tower exit stacks. The CT Drift
method, like other sampling methods where the nozzle is aligned with the flow,
uses an S-type pitot with one of the two inlets parallel to the nozzle inlet to
determine the direction of the cyclonic flow. The sampling nozzle is aligned to
the cyclonic flow by rotating the nozzle/pitot assembly until the pressure
across the S-type pitot is zero. Because the gas flow is not completely
vertical (perpendicular to the exit plane of the stack), sampling times must be
adjusted to reflect the vertical gas-flow component. The sampling time for each
traverse point is normally calculated by dividing the total sampling time by the
total number of points used to sample points. In cyclonic flows, this sampling
time for each point is adjusted by multiplying the time component by the cosine
of the angle of the nozzle alignment. For example, if the nozzle is adjusted
15° from perpendicular to account for the cyclonic flow, and the sampling time
per point is 20 minutes, then 20 minutes is multiplied by the cosine of 15°, to
yield a adjusted sampling time of 19 1/3 minutes.
In addition to the specified pitot assembly, this field test incorporated a
tell-tail, or ribbon, placed on or near the nozzle to determine the direction of
cyclonic flow. The sampling nozzle was aligned by sighting the tell-tail, and
rotating the nozzle opening 180° to the tell-tail. The tell-tail was used to
make the initial adjustment of the sampling nozzle. The pitot tube was then
used to make any final adjustment in the sampling nozzle angle. As Table 3.7
shows, the difference between the angle indicated by the tell-tail and that by
3-20
-------
the S-type pitot was relatively small, about 3.5 degrees, with a standard
deviation of approximately 2.5 degrees.
A systematic error of 2.5 to 5.0 degrees over the course of a field test
could affect sampling times as much as 10%. However, because of the length of
the field test (six hours per run), and the inherent imprecision of the
isokinetic sampling of cooling towers, about twice of that of typical Method 5-
type isokinetic sampling, this type of error would not significantly alter the
overall results.
3.8 AMBIENT AIR MINERAL CONCENTRATIONS
Ambient air sampling was done using a Method 5-type sampling system, with
the exclusion of a probe. Ambient air was drawn through a filter by the
metering system. The filter was later analyzed by ICAP for the requisite
thirty-two elements. The results are displayed as Table 3.8.
3.9 METEOROLOGICAL DATA
Meteorological data were obtained through the National Weather Service
(NWS) at Dulles International Airport, 15 miles Southwest of the sampling site.
Though the data were indicative of the area, the sampling team's instruments
showed small variances in barometric pressure and temperature from Dulles'
records. A summary of the NWS meteorological data is displayed in Table 3.9.
3.10 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Drift Calculations
The results indicate that a single percent drift rate can be established
for a particular cooling tower. The percent drift rate is determined by
isokinetic sampling using a modified CT Drift impinger train, and analysis for
two or three of the alkali or alkali earth metals of the collected emission
samples along with a representative sample of cooling water. This drift rate
can then be used to estimate mass emission rates for other contaminants detected
in the cool ing water.
3-21
-------
TABLE 3.7. TELL TAIL VS. PITOT TUBE FOR NOZZLE ALIGNMENT
Angle
(degrees)
Tell-Tail Pi
45
14
9
18
20
50
26
20
28
29
20
50
35
28
22
26
18
62
23
18
21
25
29
65
Run No.
tot Tube
45
19
14
21
22
52
29
21
24
23
24
46
33
25
22
22
22
68
18
15
16
24
18
59
Average Difference:
Standard Deviation:
3
Difference
(degrees)
0
5
5
3
2
2
3
1
4
6
4
4
2
3
0
4
4
6
5
3
5
1
11
6
Angle
(degrees)
Tell-Tail
20
15
15
19
21
69
42
26
24
18
21
65
22
21
20
16
26
77
49
30
20
16
16
50
3.7
2.37
Run No. 4
Pitot Tube
24
21
17
24
23
61
39
26
24
23
27
68
25
18
17
20
24
86
52
32
21
18
20
53
Difference
(degrees)
4
6
2
5
2
8
3
0
0
5
6
3
4
3
3
4
2
9
3
2
1
2
4
3
3.50
2.21
3-22
-------
TABLE 3.8. AMBIENT AIR MINERAL CONCENTRATION - JULY 10-12, 1990*
Date
Element
Al
B
Ca
Cr
Cu
Fe
Mg
Mn
Na
Sr
Ti
Zn
ACF
July 10
Total
ppm Catch ug/acf
2.500 70.00 0.166
0.00 0.000
1.100 30.00 0.071
0.000 -2.00 0.000
0.170 16.02 0.038
0.320 15.00 0.036
0.190 4.90 0.012
0.020 1 .23 0.003
0.890 28.00 0.066
0.022 0.40 0.001
0.057 1.90 0.005
0.020 2.00 0.005
421.5
July 11
Total
ppm Catch ug/acf
2.600 80.00 0.167
0.00 0.000
1 .000 20.00 0.042
0.000 0.00 0.000
0.078 6.82 0.014
0.330 16.00 0.033
0.190 4.90 0.010
0.020 1.23 0.003
0.890 28.00 0.058
0.023 0.50 0.001
0.037 0.00 0.000
0.064 6.40 0.013
479.4
July 12
Total
ppm Catch ug/acf
2.300 50.00 0.100
0.00 0.000
1 .000 20.00 0.040
0.050 3.00 0.006
0.120 11.02 0.022
0.510 34.00 0.068
0.240 9.90 0.020
0.020 1 .23 0.002
0.900 29.00 0.058
0.022 0.40 0.001
0.096 5.80 0.012
0.020 2.00 0.004
501.3
Filter Average
Blank ug/acf
1.800
0.800
0.020
0.010
0.170
0.141
0.008
0.610
0.018
0.038
0.000
0.144
0.000
0.051
0.002
0.025
0.046
0.014
0.003
0.061
0.001
0.005
0.007
GO
I
no
oo
ug/acfm = [(ppm - filter blank) * 100 ml] / ACF; 100 mis is volume of filter digestion solution.
*NOTE: Ambient samples could not be collected on July 9, 1991.
-------
TABLE 3.9. METEROLOGICAL CONDITIONS FOR DULLES INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT; JULY 9 -12, 1991
Date
July 9, 91
July 10, 91
July 11, 91
July 12, 91
Time
1450 - 2030
0930 - 1900
0930 - 1630
0900 - 1630
Station
Pressure
29.61 - 29.62
29.67 - 29.59
29.67 - 29.67
29.61 - 29.56
Temperature
(Dry Bulb, °F)
98 - 78
80 - 88
85 - 71
73 - 72
Humidity
IV \
\'°)
46 - 84
74 - 63
59 - 87
94 - 94
Wind
Direction
S by SW
NW by SW
W
SW
Wind
Speed (kts)
11 - 7
7 - 10
7 - 6
5 - 5
Comments
Hazy
P. Cloudy
P. Cloudy
Cloudy
NOTE: All conditions are shown as a range of conditions experienced during that time period as reported
by the National Weather Service. Measurements taken by sampling team will vary slightly.
CO
I
ro
-------
Tell-Tail vs. Pitot Tube for Nozzle Alignment into Cyclonic Flow
The experiments indicated that there was no significant difference between
using a tell-tail or S-type pitot for nozzle alignment. Therefore, a tell-tail
may be used for nozzle alignment in cyclonic flow.
Cooling Water Analysis
It is recommended that ICAP analysis of the cooling water samples include a
preconcentration step (a complexation/coprecipitation reaction). This change in
the analysis procedure is inexpensive (between $10 and $20 per sample) and would
insure that elements expected to be absent or at low concentrations in the
cooling water, such as lead or nickel, are actually absent or at very low
levels. It would further eliminate some imprecision in the analysis of elements
at concentrations close to the ICAP detection limits and would require less
extensive "boil down" procedures.
Modifications to the CT Drift Sampling Method
As discussed previously, no appreciable difference existed between the
high-and low-volume sampling methods. Therefore, isokinetic sampling for
cooling tower emissions may use a standard Method 5 metering system.
The current CT Drift method requires 0.1 N nitric acid for the impinger
reagent and 2.0 N nitric acid to be used for rinses of the sampling system. It
is recommended that an experiment be conducted during the next cooling tower
test program to assess the suitability of using 1.0 N nitric acid for both the
impinger and rinse reagent, and thereby eliminating confusion in sample train
preparation and recovery, and allowing the same "lot" of reagent to be analyzed
for the blank values. It also is recommended that at least three of the CT
Drift trains in the next test program include an extra impinger to assess
collection efficiency. Analysis of the backup filters for the next field test
should provide additional collection efficiency data. These data may eliminate
the necessity for use of an efficiency filter for future tests. In addition, a
search should be conducted for an "ultra-low" blank value filter to improve
detection limits for these samples.
3-25
-------
Ambient Air Sample Collection
Ambient air samples should be taken during each test run. These samples
should be collected using the same type of impinger train used to collect
samples from the cooling tower. Results for the ambient sampling should not be
used to adjust mass emission rates or percent drift values, but may be used to
assess levels of elements present in the ambient air.
3-26
-------
4.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES AND TEST LOCATIONS
This section describes the particular sampling locations (see Figure 2-1)
and the sampling and analytical procedures used to determine the drift emissions
from the comfort cooling tower at the National Institute of Standards and
Technology facility in Gaithersburg, Maryland.
4.1 COOLING TOWER CELL STACK SAMPLING LOCATIONS (SAMPLING LOCATIONS A, B, C,
AND D)
Six sampling systems were operated simultaneously on two of the four fan
cells of the cooling tower (see Figure 4-1). One fan cell was tested using
paired high-volume/low-volume CT Drift sampling trains; the other cell was
tested simultaneously using the same paired CT Drift sampling trains. The
schedule for the 16 runs conducted over a 4-day period, the sampling methods,
and the testing locations is presented in Table 4.1.
The Number 2 fan cell on the tower was sampled during all four runs; the
Number 3 cell was sampled during two of the four runs. The Number 1 and 4 cells
were each sampled once. There were no observable internal leaks in any of the
four fan cells. Table 4.1 presents the test schedule for Fan Cells 1 through 4.
Figures 2-1, 4-2, and 4-3 identify the sampling locations and show the
physical layout of the process cooling tower. Figure 2-1 presents the overall
dimensions of the cooling tower. Figure 4-2 is a cutaway view of a fan cell
stack showing the sample nozzle plane and the testing equipment location.
Figure 4-3 represents the top view of a fan cell showing the equal area zones,
the traverse points, and the sampling axes.
4.2 RECIRCULATING WATER PIPE (SAMPLING LOCATION E)
Recirculating water flow rates to the fan cell distribution basins were
determined from flow readings taken by the plant technicians (see Appendix E)
and from a process computer that monitored the four condenser flow rates.
Chiller water is combined and is then returned to the tower through a single 42-
inch riser pipe. Upon exiting the riser, the flow is split into four branches,
one for each of the four fan cells. Flow rates through the riser were
determined from the process computer and from data supplied by the plant process
4-1
-------
TABLE 4.1. SCHEDULE OF SAMPLING METHODS AND LOCATIONS
Day Type of Test
1 Two CTD Trains*
Two CTD Trains*
Ambient Train ****
Grab Sample
(Cooling Water)
2 Two CTD Trains*
Two CTD Trains*
Ambient Train
Grab Sample
(Cooling Water)
3 Two CTD Trains*
Two CTD Trains*
.P. Ambient Train
^ Grab Sample
(Cool ing Water)
4 Two CTD Trains*
Two CTD Trains*
Ambient Train
Grab Sample
(Cool ing Water)
Fan Cell 1 Fan Cell 2 Fan Cell 3 Fan Cell 4 Cell No.
4-hr 2
4-hr 3
**
6-hr 2
6-hr 1
**
6-hr 2
6-hr 3
**
6-hr 2
6-hr 4
**
Sample Matrix***
(A & B)
(C & D)
(G)
(J)
(A & B)
(C & D)
(G)
(J)
(A & B)
(C & D)
(G)
(J)
(A & B)
(C & D)
(G)
(J)
*0ne CTD (CT Drift) train was operated using a high-volume metering console and the other using a Method 5-type
metering console.
**0ne cooling water grab sample was taken at the beginning of the run, two in the middle, and one at the end of the run,
***From Figures 6, 7, 8, and 10, which are schematics of the sample preparation and analysis.
****The ambient sampling train could not be used on the first day.
-------
Control Room and Turbines: Grab Samples*' and Process Data, Days 1-4
Days 1-4
AMBIENT
TRAIN
"One CTD train will be operated using a high volume metering console and the other using an EPA Method 5 metering console.
** One cooling water sample will be taken at the beginning of the run, two in the middle, and one at the end of the run.
3644 3/91
Figure 4-1. Schedule of sampling methods and locations.
-------
TRAVERSE POINTS
2 AXES
12 POINTS/AXIS
24 TOTAL POINTS
22' DIA.
TOP VIEW OF FAN CELL
POINT
1
2
3
4
5
6
% OF
DIAMETER
2.1
6.7
11.8
17.7
25.0
35.6
DISTANCE
FROM INSIDE
WALL (INCHES)*
6.05
19.30
34.00
51.00
72.00
102.53
TEFLON
UMBILICAL
HOSE
Figure 4-2. Cutaway view of a fan cell stack on the cooling tower at NIST, showing the equipment locations and the nozzle traverse planes.
-------
TRAVERSE POINTS
2 AXES
12 POINTS/AXIS
24 TOTAL POINTS
22' DIA.
(HUB IS ~ 6' DIA.
Points 1 to 6 represent the distance from the inside wall to the center of the equal area zone.
Figure 4-3. Top view of a fan cell showing the sampling axes and traverse
points.
4-5
3625 3/90
-------
technicians. To obtain the flow rate to each individual cell, the measured
water flow rate for the one riser water pipe was divided by four, assuming equal
distribution to each cell.
4.3 MINERAL CONCENTRATION OF AMBIENT AND COOLING TOWER INLET AIR (SAMPLING
LOCATION F)
The mineral content of the ambient air entering the cooling tower was
determined using an EPA Method 5-type train. This train was operated
continuously at a constant sampling rate during each day of testing, upwind of
the cooling tower. The Method 5 train was modified to eliminate the
nozzle/probe assembly and the impinger assembly with the front half of the
filter holder serving as the air inlet.
The direction of dissipation of the four fan cell plumes was observed to
confirm minimal air recirculation between the fan cells.
4.4 AMBIENT AIR METEOROLOGICAL STATION (SAMPLING LOCATION G)
Ambient air meteorological data were obtained from the plant's process data
monitoring system for a location upwind of the cooling tower. The system
measured local weather conditions, including the ambient wet bulb and dry bulb
temperatures, ambient humidity, wind speed, and wind direction.
4.5 DETERMINATION OF VOLUMETRIC AIR FLOW RATES
An alignment procedure was used to determine the volumetric air flow rates
for the cooling tower fan cells. This procedure is part of the CT Drift method
and involves directing the nozzle of the sampling train directly into the
cyclonic flow of the cooling tower fan cell during sampling using pitot tube
pressure measurements to determine the correct flow angle. For this test
series, when the sampling train was moved to a new traverse point, the flow
angle was initially determined using a tell-tail attached to the sampling probe.
The exact flow angles were then determined using the S-type pitot attached to
the probe. The angles determined using the tell-tail were compared to those
determined using the pitot tube.
4-6
-------
4.6 COOLING TOWER INSTITUTE DRAFT EMISSION MEASUREMENT METHOD
A copy of the CT Drift draft emission measurement method or CTD method used
to measure the drift emissions is presented in Appendix C. Figure 4-4 shows the
CT Drift sampling train. The nozzle of the train is aligned directly into the
sample gas during sampling. The sample gas flow angle was initially determined
using a tell-tail attached to the sampling probe. The exact flow angles were
determined using the S-type pitot tubes attached to the probe.
The CTD draft emission measurement method for measuring drift from cooling
towers is similar to EPA Method 5 with four major differences: (1) a high-volume
metering system is used which draws about 2 to 3 times the sample volume of the
Method 5 metering console, (2) a 15- to 20-foot length of Teflon tubing connects
the probe exit to the inlet of the first impinger, (3) the nozzle is aligned
into the direction of the cyclonic flow with the sampling time adjusted to
compensate for this misalignment (see Appendix C, CT Drift Method), and (4) 0.1
N nitric acid is used in the impingers for sample collection and 2 N nitric acid
is used for sample recovery.
The high-volume metering consoles specified by the CTD method are not
included in any of the EPA test methods. One of the paired CTD trains on each
fan cell was operated using a Method 5-type (low-volume) metering console and
one using a high-volume metering console to compare the two systems as they
sampled the same point simultaneously. If no significant difference is found
between drift results using the two systems, consideration will be given to
specifying the more readily available Method 5-type equipment in the resulting
draft method.
4.7 CT DRIFT SAMPLE ANALYSIS
The CTD method relies on the determination of the mineral content of the
cooling tower drift collected by the sampling system. The initial step in the
analysis of the collected samples is the reduction of the sample volume to
provide measurable analyte concentrations. Because the high-volume metering
system drew about twice the sample volume of the standard Method 5 metering
system, the total volume of each high-volume impinger sample was reduced to
*
40 ml while the samples produced using the standard Method 5 system were reduced
to 20 ml. Two 10-ml aliquots of each concentrated sample were sent for
4-7
-------
Thermometer
CO
2 "S" type
pilot tubes
at 90" to
each other
High Volume SASS-type Meter Box
Standard Method 5 Metering System
3625 3/90
Figure 4-4. Schematic of CTD draft method sampling train.
-------
analysis, one to the University of Missouri (U of MO), and the other to Research
Triangle Institute (RTI) (see Figure 4-5). The sample analysis was performed by
ICAP for 32 elements: Ag, Al, As, B, Ba, Be, Bi, Ca, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, K, W,
Li, Mg, Mn, Mo, Na, Ni, P, Pb, Sb, Se, Si, Sn, Sr, Ti, Tl, V, and Zn. The back-
half filters were weighed and then digested using a hydrofluoric-nitric acid
solution and then heating the sample solution in a microwave oven. Two
10-ml aliquots were taken from this 100-ml solution. One 10-ml aliquot was sent
to RTI and the other to U of MO for ICAP analysis for 32 elements.
Liquid samples from the two low-volume CT Drift trains were reduced to a
volume of 20 ml (see Figure 4-6). One 10-ml aliquot was temporarily archived
for the same purpose as described previously for the high-volume CT Drift train
samples (see Figure 4-6). The other aliquots went to RTI or U of MO for ICAP
analysis of the 32 elements of interest. A discussion of data interpretation
for the high- and low-volume CT Drift train samples is presented in Section 5.0.
To determine the analytical precision and accuracy, one 10-ml aliquot of
sample from the high-volume trains was split into two 5-ml aliquots. One of
these 5-ml aliquots was spiked with 5 ml of the cooling water sample collected
during that run and the other was spiked with 5 ml of an audit sample, and each
pair of aliquots was submitted to one of the two labs for analysis. Since each
day's testing included two high-volume sample runs (one on each fan cell), one
pair of 5-ml aliquots was analyzed by U of MO and the other pair was analyzed by
RTI (see Figure 4-5). The remaining 10-ml from each high-volume run was
archived (see Figure 4-5). The results from the minerals analysis were used to
calculate the drift emissions in terms of: ul of drift/dscm; ml of drift/hour;
and, drift as a percent of water flow.
4.8 CT DRIFT COOLING WATER SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS (SAMPLING LOCATION J)
During each sampling run, four recirculating water samples were taken from
a sample line installed in the riser pipe supply line. This sampling station
was located inside Building 302 and is routinely used to monitor the Ph of the
recirculating water. One sample was taken at the beginning of the run, two
during the middle of the run, and one -at the end of the run. These samples were
taken by hand in uniquely labeled, EPA-approved, precleaned plastic bottles. At
4-9
-------
Impinger Sample
High-Volume
CTI Train on 1 ot 2 Fan Cells
Impinger Sample
High-Volume
CTI Train on 2 ol 2 Fan Cells
Reduce
Volume
Filler * * *
Reduce
Volume
Gravimetric
Analysis
Digested
Impinger samples A and B will be run together on the same cell
Impinger samples C and D will be run together on the same cell.
Filler analysis was the same lor A and C.
3625 3/90
Figure 4-5. Schematic of sample preparation and analysis for high-volume CTD train.
-------
B*
D
**
Filter
Impinger Sample
Low-Volume
Impinger Sample
Low-Volume
Filter
Gravimetric
Analysis
Reduce
Volume
Reduce
Volume
Digested
100 mL
20.0 mL
20.0 mL
Gravimetric
Analysis
I
Digested
10 mL aliquot
ICAP analysis
32 elements
RTI
10.0 mL
Aliquot
Temporary
Archive
10.0 mL
Aliquot ICAP
Analysis for
32 Elements
by RTI
10.0 mL
Aliquot
Temporary
Archive
10.0 mL
Aliquot ICAP
Analysis for
32 Elements
by U of M
100 mL
10 mL aliquot
ICAP analysis
32 elements
Uof M
* Impinger samples A and B will be run together on the same cell
Impinger samples C and D will be run together on the same cell.
3625 3/90
Figure 4-6. Schematic of sample preparation and analysis for low-volume CTD train
-------
the conclusion of the run, the samples were combined and filtered to separate
the suspended solids from the dissolved solids. The filtrate was stored in a
labeled sample bottle and the filter was returned to its numbered container.
These daily samples were analyzed for the 32 elements by U of MO and RTI
using ICAP analysis. Sample calculations are presented in Appendix A and data
reduction is discussed in Section 5.0. Figure 4-7 shows the scheme for the
cooling water sample preparation and analysis.
4-12
-------
G
Cooling Water
Sample
I
Filtered
in Field
Spiked with
5mL
High Audit
Spiked with
5 ml
High Audit
Figure 4-7. Schematic of sample preparation and analysis for cooling water samples.
3625 3/90
-------
5.0 DATA ASSESSMENT
Samples were collected from three different sources at the test site: the
cooling tower water, ambient air, and the cooling tower emissions. All were
analyzed to determine concentrations of the 32 target elements. Preparation of
the elemental data for the statistical evaluations included:
(1) Eliminate consideration of those elements yielding non-detect values
for any of the samples.
(2) Eliminate consideration of data resulting from obviously contaminated
samples (values at levels 500 percent above the remaining data were
determined to indicate contamination);
(3) Separation of data sets with values that were less than five times the
detection limit from those with values that were equal to or greater
than five times the detection limit; and
(4) Application of a standard T-test at a 95 percent confidence level, to
eliminate outliers.
5.1 COOLING TOWER WATER
The cooling tower water was collected from a spigot site inside the chill
plant. It was collected in four aliquots over each test run (six hours) to
yield a single representative sample of about one liter. The sample was
filtered on the test site to differentiate between suspended and dissolved
solids. The filter was placed in one sample container, and the filtrate was
volumed and placed in another container. The filter was subsequently digested
with a concentrated acid, and this sample was diluted to 100 ml.
To determine a percent drift value, the concentration of the various
elements in the cooling tower water was first determined. The total
concentration of each target element in the cooling water was calculated from
the concentrations measured in the filtrate and in the filter digestion
solution:
5-1
-------
(Filter Dig. Soln. Cone. - Blank Cone.) x 100 ml
Total Cone. = = : + Filtrate Cone
of Element Final Volume of Filtrate (ml)
in Cool ing
Water
The dissolved or soluble solids were compared to the suspended solids in
the cooling water by dividing the filtrate concentration by the total
concentration. Because Research Triangle Institute did not analyze the filter
digestion solution, only the University of Missouri data were used in
calculating values for the cooling tower water.
5.2 AMBIENT AIR
Ambient air samples were collected approximately 100 meters upwind of the
cooling tower. They were obtained by using a Method 5-type collection system
located two meters off the ground, sampling for the duration of each test run
(six hours). The concentrations of minerals and elements in the ambient air
were not used in calculating percent drift, but were measured to assess the
background levels of the target elements.
5.3 EMISSION SAMPLES
Once the concentrations of elements in the cooling tower water samples were
determined, the results were combined with the cooling tower emission
concentrations, the cooling tower water flow rates, and the cooling tower air
flow rates to calculate the percent drift values for each element for each run
(see Section 3.1 for equation). As mentioned above, the percent drift values
were subjected to a standard T-test to eliminate outliers (see Appendix A for T-
test values). The resulting percent drift values for each run were analyzed to
determine:
(1) The average percent drift and the relative standard deviation of
percent drift for each of the alkali/alkali earth metals (calcium,
magnesium, sodium, and strontium) and an average percent drift value
for these elements as a whole. Boron, a semimetal, was subsequently
added to this group, as its percent drift was in the same range of
values. An average of percent drift was first calculated for each lab
facility used, then these two values were combined to give one average
percent drift for each element (see Appendix A)-
5-2
-------
(2) The same parameters as (1) for the transition metals.
(3) The effect of using the high-volume versus the low-volume sampling
system. The system effects were compared for each alkali/alkali earth
metal by averaging high-volume train results and comparing them to the
average of the low-volume trains.
(4) Cell-to-cell and day-to-day variations analyzed in a manner similar
to (3).
(5) Sampling and analytical precision, and a comparison of the analytical
results presented by both laboratories, utilizing the drift and cooling
water data and the results of the audit and spiked emission samples.
5-3
-------
6.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL
Entropy performed a number of quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC)
activities to ensure and quantify the quality of the data collected.
To ensure test program continuity and organization, informal meetings were
held throughout the field testing phase of the project. At the meetings,
results from the testing conducted on the previous day were reviewed. Questions
were addressed and any problems or misunderstandings resolved. Responsibilities
for each member of the test team were clearly delineated, particularly in
situations where more than one person performed similar activities.
Specific quality control and quality assurance activities performed for the
sampling and analytical phases are presented below.
6.1 SAMPLING QA/QC
Prior to and at the completion of the field test all sampling equipment,
including nozzles, pitot tubes, dry gas meters, orifices, and thermocouples were
calibrated in accordance with documented procedures and acceptance criteria in
the Quality Assurance Handbook, Volume III, EPA-600/4-77-027b.
Standardized data sheets were used to record all field equipment
calibration and the pertinent run data collected during the field evaluation
testing. Applicable QC procedures and criteria from Section 3.4 of the Handbook
(EPA Method 5) were also conducted (see Appendix D).
An on-site audit of the meterbox calibrations was conducted. The results
of this audit are presented in Table 6.1. All audit values were within the
acceptable range of 5%.
TABLE 6.1. METER BOX CALIBRATION AUDIT
Meter Box
Number
EN-1
EN-2
RAC-1
RAC-3
Pre-Audit
Value
0.9597
1.0031
1.0400
1.1358
Allowable
Error
0.9072
-------
6.2 ANALYTICAL QA/QC
ICAP analyses were conducted following the standard operating procedures of
the respective laboratories (U of MO and RTI). The precision and accuracy of
the analyses were based on the results of the spiked 5-ml aliquots from the
standard-volume CT Drift train samples (see Appendix B).
Flaws in a data acquisition program caused RTI's results for the audit
samples to be off by a factor of 10 from predicted values. As a result,
duplicate analyses were conducted, and the results of the cooling tower water
analyses conducted by the University of Missouri were used to calculate the
percent drift results.
6.2.1 Blank Results
Blanks were collected for all sampling reagents, filters, DI water, and
nitric acid. Each lab analyzed these blanks for all 32 target elements. The DI
water and nitric acid blanks were insignificant compared to the sample values.
The Pallflex quartz filters used in the CT Drift train have low enough
blank values to be used in most trace element emission sampling applications.
However, when used as a backup filter to sample cooling tower emissions, their
blank levels constituted as much as 80% of total catch on the filter. Large
variances between the filter results reported by the two laboratories can be
traced to this problem.
6.2.2 Duplicate Analysis
The University of Missouri conducts random duplicate analyses as part of
its overall QA/QC procedures. All duplicate values reported were within 10% of
the original sample value. The raw lab results are not included in this report,
but are available for review.
6.2.3 Audit Sample Results
The "low" and "high" audit sample concentrations were 5.0 ppm and 50.0 ppm,
respectively, for the twelve elements used in the drift calculations (Section
3.2), with the exception of Ca and Sr, at low and high levels of 0.5 ppm and
5.0 ppm, respectively, and Ti, at 0.0 ppm and 0.0 ppm, respectively.
As mentioned above, RTI's data acquisition program caused readily apparent
errors in reporting of the audit concentrations.
6-2
-------
With the exception of calcium, the audit results for both laboratories were
typically within 15% of the predicted audit values. The audit values for calcium
were 0.5 and 5.0 ppm, respectively; U of MO reported values of 0.89 ppm and 4.90
ppm, respectively; and RTI reported values of 0.11 ppm and 0.81 ppm,
respectively. There is no apparent reason for the difference. The samples
values for calcium for both labs had standard deviations of about 25%, considered
good for cooling tower sampling. The audit results for both laboratories are
shown at the bottom of the tables in Appendix A.
6-3
-------
7.0 REFERENCES
1. The EPA Cooling Tower Drift Emissions Test draft emission measurement
method (CT Drift Method) is a modified method of the Cooling Tower
Institute (CTI) draft emission measurement method.
2. Memo from Rick Marinshaw, Midwest Research Institute, Gary, North Carolina,
to Al Vervaert, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Industrial Studies
Branch, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. "Drift Test Data from Tom
Weast, Industrial Process Cooling Tower NESHAP," November 8, 1989.
3. Wilber, K. and K. Vercauteren, "Comprehensive Drift Measurements on a
Circular Mechanical Draft Cooling Tower," Technical Paper No. TP-86-1
presented at 1986 Cooling Tower Institute Annual Meeting, Houston, Texas,
January 1986.
4. "Emission Test Report: National Bureau of Standards Steam and Chill Plant,
Gaithersburg, Maryland," EMB Report No. 86-CCT-4, ESED Project No. 85/02,
prepared by Entropy Environmentalists, Inc. for U. S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Emission Measurement Branch, Research Triangle Park,
North Carolina, under Contract No. 68-02-4336, Work Assignment Nos. 3 and
5, October 1986.
5. "Method Development and Evaluation for Chromium Air Emissions from Cooling
Towers: Munters Corporation, Fort Myers, Florida," EMB Report, ESED Project
No. 85/2b, prepared by Entropy Environmentalists, Inc. for U. S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Emission Measurement Branch, Research
Triangle Park, North Carolina, under Contract No. 68-02-4336, Work
Assignment No. 3, May 1986.
7-1
-------
APPENDIX A
FIELD TEST RESULTS
AND
DRIFT RATE CALCULATION TABLES
-------
FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
PLANT: EMB Site #2 - Gaitherstxirg, HO
RUN #
DATE
SAMPLING LOCATION
OPERATOR
C1-CTI-1
C1-CTI-2
Theta
Dia
Cp
Y
Pbar
Delta-H
Vm
tm
Vmstd
Vic
Vwstd
XH20
Mfd
Md
Ms
Pg
Ps
ts
Delta-p
vs
A
Qsd
Qmsd
Qaw
XI
7/10/90 Fan Cell #1
7/10/90 Fan Cell #1
Run Start Time
Run Finish Time
Net Traversing Points
Net Run Time, Minutes
Nozzle Diameter, Inches
Pitot Tube Coefficient
Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor
Barometric Pressure, Inches Hg
Avg. Pressure Differential of
Orifice Meter, Inches H20
Volume Of Hetered Gas Sample, Dry ACF
Dry Gas Meter Temperature, Degrees F
Volume Of Metered Gas Sample, Dry SCF*
Total Volume of Liquid Collected
in Impingers & Silica Gel, ml
Volume of Water Vapor, SCF*
Moisture Content, Percent by Volume
Dry Mole Fraction
Gas Molecular Weight, Ib/lb-Mole, Dry
Gas Molecular Weight, Ib/lb-Mole, Wet
Flue Gas Static Pressure, Inches H20
Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, Inches Hg
Flue Gas Temperature, Degrees F
Average Velocity Head, Inches H20
Flue Gas Velocity, Feet/Second
Stack/Duct Area, Square Inches
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM*
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCMM*
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Wet ACFM
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, Percent
C1-CTI-1
932
1904
24
342.50
0.369
0.840
0.9821
30.00
1.43
583.130
95
547.983
508.1
23.916
4.2
0.958
28.84
28.38
0.0
30.00
90
0.4377
38.19
97,314
1,427,941
40,439
1,548,509
102.0
Matt Hamilton
Matt Hamilton
C1-CTI-2
930
1904
24
342.50
0.275
0.840
1.1360
30.00
2.28
282.581
97
306.695
280.0
13.180
4.1
0.959
28.84
28.40
0.0
30.00
90
0.4377
38.17
97,314
1,428,683
40,460
1,547,698
102.7
* 68° F (20° C) -- 29.92 Inches of Mercury (Hg)
-------
FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
PLANT: EMB Site #2 Gaithersburg, MO
RUN # DATE SAMPLING LOCATION
OPERATOR
C2-CTI-1
C2-CTI-2
C2-CTI-3
C2-CTI-4
Theta
Dia
Cp
Y
Pbar
Delta-H
Vm
tm
Vmstd
Vic
Vustd
%H20
Mfd
Md
Ms
Pg
Ps
ts
Del ta-p
vs
A
Qsd
Qmsd
Qau
XI
7/09/90 Fan Cell #2
7/09/90 Fan Cell #2
7/10/90 Fan Cell #2
7/10/90 Fan Cell #2
Run Start Time
Run Finish Time
Net Traversing Points
Net Run Time, Minutes
Nozzle Diameter, Inches
Pitot Tube Coefficient
Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor
Barometric Pressure, Inches Hg
Avg. Pressure Differential of
Orifice Meter, Inches HjO
Volume Of Metered Gas Sample, Dry ACF
Dry Gas Meter Temperature, Degrees f
Volume Of Metered Gas Sample, Dry SCF*
Total Volume of Liquid Collected
in Impingers & Silica Gel, ml
Volume of Water Vapor, SCF*
Moisture Content, Percent by Volume
Dry Mole Fraction
Gas Molecular Weight, Ib/lb-Mole, Dry
Gas Molecular Weight, Ib/lb-Mole, Wet
Flue Gas Static Pressure, Inches HjO
Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, Inches Hg
Flue Gas Temperature, Degrees F
Average Velocity Head, Inches HjO
Flue Gas Velocity, Feet/Second
Stack/Duct Area, Square Inches
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM*
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCMM*
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Wet ACFM
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, Percent
C2-CTI-1
1452
2036
24
254.25
0.370
0.840
1.0220
29.40
1.04
397.703
103
375.384
380.7
17.920
4.6
0.954
28.84
28.34
0.0
29.40
92
0.3722
35.66
97,314
1,296,506
36,717
1,445,924
103.1
BARRY RUDD
BARRY RUDD
Barry Rudd
BARRY RUDD
C2-CTI-2
1450
2034
24
254.25
0.275
0.840
1.0400
29.40
2.20
215.163
104
206.895
213.7
10.059
4.6
0.954
28.84
28.34
0.0
29.40
92
0.3722
35.66
97,314
1,296,506
36,717
1,445,924
102.8
C2-CTI-3
927
1902
24
345.78
0.370
0.840
1.0220
30.00
1.05
537.894
97
523.635
515.5
24.265
4.4
0.956
28.84
23.36
0.0
30.00
92
0.3664
35.01
97,314
1,301,573
36,861
1,419,568
105.3
C2-CII.
"1
'
K.I
0.2?
0.!!
1.0(1
30,1
"
299,(t|
11
29U
285,
13.U
I,
o.flj
2S.J
25.5
'1
30.1,
<
OJi;
35.1
97,il
1,301,5'
36,»
1,419,51
107
68° F (20° C) -- 29.92 Inches of Mercury (Hg)
-------
FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
PLANT: EMB Site #2 - Gaithersburg, HD
RUN # DATE SAMPLING LOCATION
OPERATOR
C2-CTI-5
C2-CTI-6
C2-CTI-7
C2-CTI-8
Theta
Dia
Cp
Y
Pbar
Delta-H
Vm
tm
Vmstd
Vic
Vwstd
%H20
Mfd
Md
Ms
pg
Ps
ts
Delta-p
vs
A
Qsd
Omsd
Qaw
XI
7/11/90 Fan Cell #2
7/11/90 Fan Cell #2
7/12/90 Fan Cell #2
7/12/90 Fan Cell #2
Run Start Time
Run Finish Time
Net Traversing Points
Net Run Time, Minutes
Nozzle Diameter, Inches
Pitot Tube Coefficient
Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor
Barometric Pressure, Inches Hg
Avg. Pressure Differential of
Orifice Meter, Inches H20
Volume Of Metered Gas Sample, Dry ACF
Dry Gas Meter Temperature, Degrees F
Volume Of Metered Gas Sample, Dry SCF*
Total Volume of Liquid Collected
in Impingers & Silica Gel, ml
Volume of Water Vapor, SCF*
Moisture Content, Percent by Volume
Dry Mole Fraction
Gas Molecular Weight, Ib/lb-Mole, Dry
Gas Molecular Weight, Ib/lb-Mole, Wet
Flue Gas Static Pressure, Inches H20
Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, Inches Hg
Flue Gas Temperature, Degrees F
Average Velocity Head, Inches H20
Flue Gas Velocity, Feet/Second
Stack/Duct Area, Square Inches
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM*
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCMM*
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Wet ACFM
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, Percent
C2-CTI-5
937
1629
24
369.25
0.370
0.840
1.0220
30.00
1.15
588.396
87
583.412
420.0
19.769
3.3
0.967
28.84
28.48
0.0
30.00
85
0.4100
36.72
97,314
1,398,590
39,608
1,488,904
102.2
BARRY RUDD
BARRY RUDD
BARRY RUDD
BARRY RUDD
C2-CTI-6
935
1637
24
369.25
0.275
0.840
1.0400
30.00
2.47
325.298
98
322.791
239.0
11.250
3.4
0.966
28.84
28.47
0.0
30.00
85
0.4100
36.73
97,314
1,397,524
39,578
1,489,310
102.5
C2-CTI-7
917
1541
24
351.25
0.370
0.840
1.0220
29.20
2.13
763.483
87
738.699
620.5
29.207
3.8
0.962
28.84
28.43
0.0
29.20
85
0.3721
35.49
97,314
1,308,892
37,068
1,439,031
145.4
C2-CTI-8
915
1539
24
351.25
0.275
0.840
1.0400
29.20
2.34
306.083
103
292.952
266.2
12.53C
4. 1
0.959
28. Si
28.4C
O.C
29. 2C
85
0.3721
35.51
97, 3H
1,305,54f
36,973
1,439,842
104.7
* 68" F (20° C) -- 29.92 Inches of Mercury (Hg)
-------
FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
PLANT: EMB Site #2 - Gaithersburg, MD
RUN # DATE SAMPLING LOCATION
OPERATOR
C3-CTI-1
C3-CTI-2
C3-CTI-3
C3-CTI-4
Theta
Dia
Cp
Y
Pbar
Delta-H
Vm
tm
Vmstd
Vic
Vwstd
XH20
Mfd
Md
Ms
Pg
Ps
ts
Delta-p
vs
A
Qsd
Omsd
Qaw
XI
7/09/90 Fan Cell #3
7/09/90 Fan Cell #3
7/11/90 Fan Cell #3
7/11/90 Fan Cell #3
Run Start Time
Run Finish Time
Net Traversing Points
Met Run Time, Minutes
Nozzle Diameter, Inches
Pitot Tube Coefficient
Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor
Barometric Pressure, Inches Hg
Avg. Pressure Differential of
Orifice Meter, Inches H20
Volume Of Metered Gas Sample, Dry ACF
Dry Gas Meter Temperature, Degrees F
Volume Of Metered Gas Sample, Dry SCF*
Total Volume of Liquid Collected
in Impingers & Silica Gel, ml
Volume of Water Vapor, SCF*
Moisture Content, Percent by Volune
Dry Mole Fraction
Gas Molecular Weight, Ib/lb-Mole, Dry
Gas Molecular Weight, Ib/lb-Mole, Wet
Flue Gas Static Pressure, Inches H^O
Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, Inches Hg
Flue Gas Temperature, Degrees F
Average Velocity Head, Inches HpO
Flue Gas Velocity, Feet/Second
Stack/Duct Area, Square Inches
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM*
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCMM*
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Wet ACFM
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, Percent
C3-CTI-1
1454
2028
24
235.75
0.376
0.840
0.9821
29.40
1.59
418.450
103
380.067
404.8
19.054
4.8
0.952
28.84
28.32
0.0
29.40
94
0.4583
39.66
97,314
1,433,718
40,603
1,608,114
98.5
Matt Hamilton
Matt Hamilton
Matt Hamilton
Matt Hamilton
C3-CTI-2
1452
2025
24
235.75
0.275
0.840
1.1360
29.40
2.74
210.078
101
222.130
224.0
10.544
4.5
0.955
28.84
28.35
0.0
29.40
94
0.4583
39.63
97,314
1,437,148
40,700
1,606,897
107.4
C3-CTI-3
934
1535
24
317.50
0.369
0.840
0.9821
30.00
1.55
558.442
88
531.643
376.5
17.722
3.2
0.968
28.84
28.49
0.0
30.00
84
0.4702
39.29
97,314
1,500,777
42,502
1,593,111
101.5
C3-C1I.
«
«
I
325.1
0.2!
O.K
1.1K
30,1
U
276.71
!
303.71
221
10.XJ
'
0,1
28.1
28,1
1
1
0.471
39.!
97,3
1,500,31
42,*
1,594,3
n
* 68° F (20° C) -- 29.92 Inches of Mercury (Hg)
-------
FIELD DATA AND RESULTS TABULATION
PLANT: EHB Site #2 Gaithersburg, HO
RUN it
DATE
SAMPLING LOCATION
OPERATOR
C4-CTI-1
C4-CTI-2
Theta
Dia
CP
Y
Pbar
Delta-H
Vm
tm
Vmstd
Vic
Vwstd
XH20
Mfd
Md
Ms
Pg
Ps
ts
Delta-p
vs
A
Qsd
Qmsd
Oaw
XI
7/12/90 Fan Cell #4
7/12/90 Fan Cell #4
Run Start Time
Run Finish Time
Net Traversing Points
Net Run Time, Minutes
Nozzle Diameter, Inches
Pitot Tube Coefficient
Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor
Barometric Pressure, Inches Hg
Avg. Pressure Differential of
Orifice Meter, Inches H-,0
Volume Of Metered Gas Sample, Dry ACF
Dry Gas Meter Temperature, Degrees F
Volume Of Metered Gas Sample, Dry SCF*
Total Volume of Liquid Collected
in Impingers & Silica Gel, ml
Volume of Water Vapor, SCF*
Moisture Content, Percent by Volume
Dry Mole Fraction
Gas Molecular Weight, Ib/lb-Hole, Dry
Gas Molecular Weight, Ib/lb-Mole, Wet
Flue Gas Static Pressure, Inches H-,0
Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, Inches Hg
Flue Gas Temperature, Degrees F
Average Velocity Head, Inches H20
Flue Gas Velocity, Feet/Second
Stack/Duct Area, Square Inches
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM*
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCMH*
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Wet ACFM
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, Percent
C4-CTI-1
919
1627
24
385.00
0.369
0.840
0.9821
29.20
3.30
1001.288
88
931.986
730.3
34.375
3.6
0.964
28.84
23.45
0.0
29.20
83
0.4889
40.59
97,314
1,505,621
42,639
1,645,823
146.3
Matt Hami Iton
Hatt Hamilton
C4-CTI-2
918
1626
24
385.00
0.275
0.840
1.1360
29.20
2.63
336.112
92
358.650
296.7
13.966
3.7
0.963
28.84
28.44
0.0
29.20
83
0.4889
40.60
97,314
1,504,429
42,605
1,646,229
101.5
68° F (20° C) -- 29.92 Inches of Mercury (Hg)
-------
Cooling Tower Test
EEI #3644
BLANKS
Analysis and Drift Data (RTI Analysis)
ALUMINUM Percent Percent
(ppm) Drift
DI Water 0.42
Nitric Acid 0.24
Filter, 47mm qtz 0.31
Filter, Whatman 41 ND
Fan
No.
C2
C2
C2
C2
C3
C3
C2
C2
C2
C2
Cl
Cl
C2
C2
C2
C2
C3
C3
C2
C2
C2
C2
C4
C4
Filter, Pflex qtz
Type Run Matrix
No.
CTI/HI 1 F
CTI/HI 1 N
CTI/LO 2 F
CTI/LO 2 N
CTI/HI 1 F
CTI/HI 1 N
CTI/HI 3 F
CTI/HI 3 N
CTI/LO 4 F
CTI/LO 4 N
CTI/HI 1 F
CTI/HI 1 N
CTI/HI 5 F
CTI/HI 5 N
CTI/LO 6 F
CTI/LO 6 N
CTI/HI 3 F
CTI/HI 3 N
CTI/HI 7 F
CTI/HI 7 N
CTI/LO 8 F
CTI/LO 8 N
CTI/HI 1 F
CTI/HI 1 N
Average
Rel. Std. Dev
1.38
1.64 2.5740
0.72
1.41 1.7797
0.96
1.72 3.0811
0.63
2.05 7.4235
0.23
1.71 6.5045
0.20
1.66 3.2519
0.20
1.96 8.6256
0.24
1.93 16.4804
0.56
1.78
0.69
1.74 5.0977
0.16
2.06 29.5461
0.99
1.61
0.36
8.436
Drift
(T-test)
2.5740
1.7797
3.0811
7.4235
6.5045
3.2519
8.6256
16.4804
5.0977
6.091
75%
COOLING WATER (ppm)
Run 1
Run 2
Run 3
Run 4
0.20
0.10
0.07
0.05
AUDITS (ppm)
Low
High
4.49
44.80
BORON
(ppm)
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.03
0.01
0.01
0.08
0.07
0.02
0.06
0.04
0.
0.
0.
ND
15
03
10
0.05
0.02
0.07
0.04
0.05
0.04
0.05
0.02
0.06
0.04
0.05
0.03
9.33
11.50
12.26
12.00
ND
ND
Percent Percent
Drift Drift
(T-test)
0.0048
0.0067
0.0108
0.0047
0.0125
0.0037
0.0114
0.010
0.0048
0.0067
0.0108
0.0069 0.0069
0.0254
0.0101 0.0101
0.0047
0.0125
0.0037
0.0114
0.008
41%
DETECTION LIMIT
0.14
0.01
-------
Cooling Tower Test
EEI #3644
BLANKS
Analysis and Drift Data (RTI Analysis)
CALCIUM Percent Percent CHROMIUM Percent Percent
DI Water
Nitric Acid
Filter, 47mm qtz
Filter, Whatman 41
Filter, Pflex qtz
Average
Rel. Std.
COOLING WATER (ppm)
Run 1
Run 2
Run 3
Run 4
AUDITS (ppm)
(ppm)
0.00
0.02
ND
0.11
Fan
No.
C2
C2
C2
C2
C3
C3
C2
C2
C2
C2
Cl
Cl
C2
C2
C2
C2
C3
C3
C2
C2
C2
C2
C4
C4
Type
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/LO
CTI/LO
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/LO
CTI/LO
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/LO
CTI/LO
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/LO
CTI/LO
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
Run
No.
1
1
2
2
1
1
3
3
4
4
1
1
5
5
6
6
3
3
7
7
8
a
1
1
Matri
F
N
F
N
F
N
F
N
F
N
F
N
F
N
F
N
F
N
F
N
F
N
F
N
0.13
0.89
0.16
1.14
0.13
1.67
0.14
1.15
0.16
0.84
0.15
1.55
0.13
1.23
0.13
1.11
0.14
0.68
0.13
1.13
0.12
1.66
0.13
1.54
Low
High
369.27
378.28
357.97
370.80
0.11
0.81
Drift
Drift
(T-test)
0.0012 0.0012
0.0016 0.0016
0.0024 0.0024
0.0014 0.0014
0.0011 0.0011
0.0020 0.0020
0.0015 0.0015
0.0013 0.0013
0.0010 0.0010
0.0018 0.0018
0.002 0.002
28%
(ppm)
ND
0.01
ND
ND
0.01
Drift
0.06
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.01
5.05
47.40
Drift
(T-test)
0.02
0.07
0.01
0.10
0.02
0.08
0.03
0.07
0.02
0.07
0.02
0.03
0.02
0.07
0.02
0.05
0.02
0.06
0.03
0.07
0.02
0.11
0.02
1.9975 1.9975
2.3175 2.3175
2.3718 2.3718
5.9566 5.9566
5.1879 5.1879
2.3739 2.3739
3.8716 3.8716
3.9834 3.9834
6.5760 6.5760
9.3083
4.394
3.848
45%
DETECTION LIMIT
0.00
0.01
-------
Cooling Tower Test
EEI #3644
Analysis and Drift Data (RTI Analysis)
BLANKS COPPER
(ppm)
DI Water ND
Nitric Acid ND
Filter, 47mm qtz ND
Filter, Whatman 41 ND
Fan
No.
C2
C2
C2
C2
C3
C3
C2
C2
C2
C2
Cl
Cl
C2
C2
C2
C2
C3
C3
C2
C2
C2
C2
C4
C4
Filter, Pflex qtz
Type Run Matri
No.
CTI/HI 1 F
CTI/HI 1 N
CTI/LO 2 F
CTI/LO 2 N
CTI/HI 1 F
CTI/HI 1 N
CTI/HI 3 F
CTI/HI 3 N
CTI/LO 4 F
CTI/LO 4 N
CTI/HI 1 F
CTI/HI 1 N
CTI/HI 5 F
CTI/HI 5 N
CTI/LO 6 F
CTI/LO 6 N
CTI/HI 3 F
CTI/HI 3 N
CTI/HI 7 F
CTI/HI 7 N
CTI/LO 8 F
CTI/LO 8 N
CTI/HI 1 F
CTI/HI 1 N
Average
Rel. Std.
ND
ND
0.18
ND
0.25
ND
0.20
ND
0.05
ND
0.08
ND
0.05
ND
0.05
ND
0.07
ND
0.54
ND
0.10
ND
0.08
ND
0.04
COOLING WATER (ppm)
Run 1
Run 2
Run 3
Run 4
0.10
0.06
0.04
0.04
AUDITS (ppm)
Low
High
5.17
49.20
Percent Percent
Drift Drift
(T-test)
0.8174 0.8174
1.0196 1.0196
0.9886 0.9886
0.3461 0.3461
0.4648 0.4648
0.3414 0.3414
0.5002
0.6825
0.7799
0.8077
0.675
0.5002
0.6825
0.7799
0.8077
0.675
37%
IRON
(ppm)
0.20
0.22
0.06
ND
0.15
0.22
1.01
0.22
1.01
0.26
1.21
34
65
26
0.62
0.27
0.68
0.28
0.61
0.46
1.23
0.28
3.60
0.50
0.75
0.30
2.12
0.31
0.93
0.44
0.18
0.11
0.06
So 19
50.00
Percent
Drift
Percent
Drift
(T-test)
1.0323 1.0323
1.0666 1.0666
1.4477 1.4477
2.1585
2.0618
1.8839
2.6661
8.6732
2.1585
2.0618
1.8839
2.6661
8.6732
6.7921 6.7921
16.0999
4.388
3.087
88%
DETECTION LIMIT
0.03
0.02
-------
Cooling Tower Test
EEI #3644
BLANKS
Analysis and Drift Data (RTI Analysis]
MAGNESIUM Percent Percent MANGANESE Percent Percent
(ppm)
DI Water 0.02
Nitric Acid 0.12
Filter, 47mm qtz 0.06
Filter, Whatman 41 0.02
Filter, Pflex qtz 0.14
Drift
Fan
No.
C2
C2
C2
C2
C3
C3
C2
C2
C2
C2
Cl
Cl
C2
C2
C2
C2
C3
C3
C2
C2
C2
C2
C4
C4
Type
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/LO
CTI/LO
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/LO
CTI/LO
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/LO
CTI/LO
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/LO
CTI/LO
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
Run
No.
1
1
2
2
1
1
3
3
4
4
1
1
5
5
6
6
3
3
7
7
8
8
1
1
Matri
F
N
F
N
F
N
F
N
F
N
F
N
F
N
F
N
F
N
F
N
F
N
F
N
0.16
1.59
0.24
0.04
0.19
2.12
0.15
1.43
0.19
1.94
0.20
1.82
0.16
0.96
0.19
2.67
0.19
1.46
0.17
2.18
0.13
3.16
0.16
1.24
Average
Rel. Std.
COOLING WATER (ppm)
Run 1
Run 2
Run 3
Run 4
AUDITS (ppm)
Low
High
109.29
113.13
108.18
111.14
4.79
46.40
Drift
(T-test)
0.0065 0.0065
0.0020 0.0020
0.0099 0.0099
0.0051 0.0051
0.0072 0.0072
0.0075 0.0075
0.0035 0.0035
0.0099 0.0099
0.0059 0.0059
0.0105 0.0105
0.007 0.007
42%
(ppm)
ND
0.01
0.00
ND
0.01
0.01
0.18
0.01
1.17
0.01
0.13
0.01
0.18
0.01
0.04
0.01
0.49
0.01
0.09
0.01
0.03
0.01
0.12
0.01
0.09
0.01
0.05
0.01
0.09
Drift
0.04
0.02
0.02
0.02
4.76
46.40
Drift
(T-test)
2.0675
12.3641
1.5435
2.0675
1.5435
3.1580 3.1580
0.6439 0.6439
9.2571 9.2571
1.6702 1.6702
0.7108 0.7108
1.4055 1.4055
0.9891 0.9891
3.381 2.383
113%
DETECTION LIMIT
0.00
0.00
-------
Cooling Tower Test
EEI #3644
Analysis and Drift Data (RTI Analysis)
BLANKS
DI Water
Nitric Acid
Filter, 47mm qtz
Filter, Whatman 41
Fan
No.
C2
C2
C2
C2
C3
C3
C2
C2
C2
C2
Cl
Cl
C2
C2
C2
C2
C3
C3
C2
C2
C2
C2
C4
C4
Filter, Pflex qtz
Type Run Matri
No.
CTI/HI 1 F
CTI/HI 1 N
CTI/LO 2 F
CTI/LO 2 N
CTI/HI 1 F
CTI/HI 1 N
CTI/HI 3 F
CTI/HI 3 N
CTI/LO 4 F
CTI/LO 4 N
CTI/HI 1 F
CTI/HI 1 N
CTI/HI 5 F
CTI/HI 5 N
CTI/LO 6 F
CTI/LO 6 N
CTI/HI 3 F
CTI/HI 3 N
CTI/HI 7 F
CTI/HI 7 N
CTI/LO 8 F
CTI/LO 8 N
CTI/HI 1 F
CTI/HI 1 N
Average
Rel. Std.
SODIUM Percent Percent
(ppm) Drift Drift
ND (T-test)
0.05
ND
0.07
0.09 0.0015
0.63
0.14 0.0024
0.82
0.10 0.0030
1.15
0.07 0.0016
0.79
0.14 0.0021
0.77
0.11 0.0014
0.57
0.09 0.0009
0.36
0.11 0.0014
0.51
0.09
0.29
0.06 0.0007
0.47
0.05 0.0015
0.81
0.07
0.21
0.002
0.0015
0.0024
0.0016
0.0021
0.0014
0.0009
0.0014
0.0007
0.0015
0.001
35%
COOLING WATER (ppm)
Run 1
Run 2
Run 3
Run 4
205.32
213.20
203.33
211.32
AUDITS (ppm)
Low
High
0.49
5.41
(ppm)
ND
ND
0.01
0.00
0.02
0.02
0.04
0.02
0.04
0.02
0.04
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.03
0.02
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.02
0.07
0.02
0.03
0.02
0.05
0.02
0.02
2.03
2.09
1.99
2.08
0.51
5.05
Drift
Percent
Drift
(T-test)
0.0091
0.0116
0.0108
0.008
0.0091
0.0116
0.0108
0.0062 0.0062
0.0070 0.0070
0.0054 0.0054
0.0051 0.0051
0.0094 0.0094
0.0046 0.0046
0.0115 0.0115
0.008
34%
DETECTION LIMIT
0.03
0.00
-------
Cooling Tower Test
EEI #3644
Analysis and Drift Data (RTI Analysis)
BLANKS TITANIUM Percent Percent
(ppm) Drift Drift
DI Water ND (T-test)
Nitric Acid
Filter, 47mm qtz 0.49
Filter, Whatman 41 0.02
Filter, Pflex qtz 0.03
Fan Type Run Matri
No.
C2
C2
C2
C2
C3
C3
C2
C2
C2
C2
Cl
Cl
C2
C2
C2
C2
C3
C3
C2
C2
C2
C2
C4
C4
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/LO
CTI/LO
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/LO
CTI/LO
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/LO
CTI/LO
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/LO
CTI/LO
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
No.
1
1
2
2
1
1
3
3
4
4
1
1
5
5
6
6
3
3
7
7
3
8
1
1
Average
F
N
F
N
F
N
F
N
F
N
F
N
F
N
F
N
F
N
F
N
F
N
F
N
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
ND
0.
0.
0.
0.
Rel. Std.
09 1.1075 1.1075
02
05 0.5979 0.5979
02
59 10.6285
05
06 0.5791 0.5791
02
08 1.2990 1.2990
01
07 0.7819 0.7819
02
03 0.2560 0.2560
04
04 0.5316 0.5316
06
07
07
07 0.3939 0.3939
13 3.0829 3.0829
07
05
02
1.926 0.959
90%
ZINC Percent
(ppm) Drift
0.04
0.21
0.01
0.01
0.02
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
6
.04 2.7641
.86
.05 2.9013
.87
.02 3.2543
.95
.03 1.0021
.39
.09 3.2954
.57
.03 0.7240
.32
.03 19.6817
.90
.08 12.2045
.37
.02
.00
.04 5.1181
.41
.04 10.0776
.52
.03
.35
6.102
Percent
Drift
(T-test)
2.7641
2.9013
3.2543
1.0021
3.2954
0.7240
12.2045
5.1181
10.0776
4.593
86%
COOLING WATER (ppm)
Run 1
Run 2
Run 3
Run 4
0.
0.
0.
0.
07
07
07
07
0
0
0
0
.12
.08
.02
.02
AUDITS (ppm)
Low
High
ND
0.
01
4
48
.96
.50
DETECTION LIMIT
0.01
0.01
-------
Cooling Tower Test
EEI #3644
BLANKS
Analysis and Drift Data (UoM Analysis)
ALUMINUM Percent Percent CALCIUM Percent Percent
DI Water
Nitric Acid
Filter, 47mm qtz
Filter, Whatman 41
Filter, Pflex qtz
Fan
No.
C2
C2
C3
C3
C3
C3
C2
C2
Cl
Cl
Cl
Cl
C2
C2
C3
C3
C3
C3
C2
C2
C4
C4
C4
C4
Type
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/LO
CTI/LO
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/LO
CTI/LO
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/LO
CTI/LO
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/LO
CTI/LO
Run
No.
1
1
1
1
2
2
3
3
1
1
2
2
5
5
3
3
4
4
7
7
1
1
2
2
Matrix
F
N
F
N
F
N
F
N
F
N
F
N
F
N
F
N
F
N
F
N
F
N
F
N
2.10
2.39
1.90
1.00
2.20
1.50
2.40
0.46
2.00
1.60
1.90
0.70
2.60
0.66
2.50
1.10
2.80
1.10
2.10
0.55
3.10
0.69
2.50
1.50
Average
Rel. Std. Dev.
COOLING WATER (ppm)
Run 1
Run 2
Run 3
Run 4
AUDITS (ppm)
Low
High
(ppm)
0.06
0.41
0.77
ND
1.80
2.10
2.39
1.90
1.00
2.20
1.50
2.40
0.46
2.00
1.60
1.90
0.70
2.60
0.66
2.50
1.10
2.80
1.10
2.10
0.55
3.10
0.69
2.50
1.50
0.20
0.10
0.07
0.05
5.10
49.70
Drift Drift
(T-test)
6.2132 6.2132
2.0855 2.0855
6.5868 6.5868
6.8695 6.8695
5.0869 5.0869
4.4845 4.4845
13.3845 13.3845
5.0411 5.0411
6.219 6.219
53%
(ppm)
0.25
1.50
0.03
0.06
0.80
1.00
6.00
0.97
7.30
1.00
8.90
0.96
5.10
1.30
7.50
1.10
4.10
0.98
5.80
1.10
4.90
1.40
10.00
0.93
8.40
Drift Drift
(T-test
0.0063 0.0063
0.0085 0.0085
0.0098 0.0098
0.0046 0.0046
0.0051 0.0051
0.0072 0.0072
0.0056 0.0056
0.0060 0.0060
1.30
11.00
1.40
16.00
369.27
378.28
357.97
370.80
0.89
4.90
0.007
0.007
27%
DETECTION LIMIT
0.10
2.00
-------
Cooling Tower Test
EEI #3644
BLANKS
DI Water
Nitric Acid
Filter, 47mm qtz
Filter, Whatman 41
Filter, Pflex qtz
Analysis and Drift Data (UoM Analysis)
CHROMIUM Percent Percent COPPER Percent Percent
ND
(ppm)
ND
ND
ND
0.02
Drift Drift
(T-test)
(ppm)
ND
0.01
ND
ND
0.01
Fan
No.
C2
C2
C3
C3
C3
C3
C2
C2
Cl
Cl
Cl
Cl
C2
C2
C3
C3
C3
C3
C2
C2
C4
C4
C4
C4
Type
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/LO
CTI/LO
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/LO
CTI/LO
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/LO
CTI/LO
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/LO
CTI/LO
Run
No.
1
1
1
1
2
2
3
3
1
1
2
2
5
5
3
3
4
4
7
7
1
1
2
2
Matrix
F
N
F
N
F
N
F
N
F
N
F
N
F
N
F
N
F
N
F
N
F
N
F
N
0.00 7.6095 7.6095
0.28
0.05 4.9214 4.9214
0.09
0.00 3.5636 3.5636
0.14
0.00 4.9017 4.9017
0.08
0.00 1.2682 1.2682
0.04
0.00 5.4645 5.4645
0.05
0.10 13.5153 13.5153
0.09
0.34
0.07
0.68
0.09
0.76 118.1238
0.08
3.40
0.07
9.70
0.10
0.03
0.20
0.00
0.23
0.00
0.33
0.00
0.07
0.01
0.08
0.01
0.07
0.04
0.06
0.03
0.62
0.03
0.06
0.06
0.08
0.38
0.06
0.58
0.23
Drift Drift
(T-test)
1.0790 1.0790
1.0778 1.0778
1.3248 1.3248
0.4235 0.4235
0.2717 0.2717
0.7490 0.7490
1.3938 1.3938
1.5056 1.5056
Average
Rel. Std. D
19.921
5.892
66%
0.978
0.978
47%
COOLING WATER (ppm)
Run 1
Run 2
Run 3
Run 4
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.10
0.06
0.04
0.04
AUDITS (ppm)
Low
High
5.20
49.10
5.18
50.20
DETECTION LIMIT
0.05
0.01
-------
Cooling Tower Test
EEI #3644
BLANKS
DI Water
Nitric Acid
Filter, 47mm qtz
Filter, Whatman 41
Fan
No.
C2
C2
C3
C3
C3
C3
C2
C2
Cl
Cl
Cl
Cl
C2
C2
C3
C3
C3
C3
C2
C2
C4
C4
C4
C4
Filter, Pflex qtz
Type Run Matrix
No.
CTI/HI 1 F
CTI/HI 1 N
CTI/HI 1 F
CTI/HI 1 N
CTI/LO 2 F
CTI/LO 2 N
CTI/HI 3 F
CTI/HI 3 N
CTI/HI 1 F
CTI/HI 1 N
CTI/LO 2 F
CTI/LO 2 N
CTI/HI 5 F
CTI/HI 5 N
CTI/HI 3 F
CTI/HI 3 N
CTI/LO 4 F
CTI/LO 4 N
CTI/HI 7 F
CTI/HI 7 N
CTI/HI 1 F
CTI/HI 1 N
CTI/LO 2 F
CTI/LO 2 N
Average
Rel. Std. D
IRON
(ppm)
0.02
0.16
0.09
0.02
0.17
0.23
1.58
0.18
1.36
0.22
1.27
0.24
0.74
0.23
0.84
0.47
0.61
0.60
0.73
1.40
4.09
2.60
1.06
3.26
0.87
13.90
1.01
43.10
2.39
COOLING WATER (ppm)
Run 1
Run 2
Run 3
Run 4
0.44
0.18
0.11
0.06
AUDITS (ppm)
Low
High
5.37
51.10
Analysis and Drift Data (UoM Analysis)
Percent Percent MAGNESIUM Percent Percent
Drift
Drift
(T-test)
1.6675 1.6675
1.4193 1.4193
1.3529 1.3529
1.8069 1.8069
1.2275 1.2275
5.3823 5.3823
6.1920 6.1920
40.9709
7.502
2.721
78%
(ppm)
0.02
0.12
0.06
0.01
0.14
0.16
1.70
0.18
2.40
0.18
2.30
0.13
1.70
0.20
2.20
0.18
1.20
0.16
Drift
.20
.19
.60
0.36
3.32
1.
0,
1.
0.20
2.60
0.24
1.40
0.26
5.92
109.29
113.13
108.18
111.14
5.20
49.70
Drift
(T-test)
0.0069 0.0069
0.0110 0.0110
0.0094 0.0094
0.0061 0.0061
0.0048 0.0048
0.0084 0.0084
0.0044 0.0044
0.0072 0.0072
0.007
0.007
31%
DETECTION LIMIT
0.03
0.08
-------
Cooling Tower Test
EEI #3644
BLANKS
DI Water
Nitric Acid
Filter, 47mm qtz
Filter, Whatman 41
Filter, Pflex qtz
Analysis and Drift Data (UoM Analysis)
Fan
No.
C2
C2
C3
C3
C3
C3
C2
C2
Cl
Cl
Cl
Cl
C2
C2
C3
C3
C3
C3
C2
C2
C4
C4
C4
C4
Type
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/LO
CTI/LO
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/LO
CTI/LO
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/LO
CTI/LO
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/LO
CTI/LO
Run
No.
1
1
1
1
2
2
3
3
1
1
2
2
5
5
3
3
4
4
7
7
1
1
2
2
Matrix
F
N
F
N
F
N
F
N
F
N
F
N
F
N
F
N
F
N
F
N
F
N
F
N
Average
Rel.
Std. D
COOLING WATER (ppm)
Run 1
Run 2
Run 3
Run 4
AUDITS (ppm)
Low
High
NGANESE Percent
(ppm) Drift
ND
0.01
0.00
ND
0.01
0.02 2.4919
0.19
0.02 2,0885
0.14
0.02 15.8648
1.41
0.02 4.0854
0.20
0.02 6.1129
0.59
0.02 1.6192
0.02
0.00 2.0158
0.11
0.05
0.13
0.14
0.04
0.15 6.7108
0.11
3.07
0.09
4.86
0.06
5.124
0.04
0.02
0.02
0.02
5.13
49.00
Percent
Drift
(T-test)
2.4919
2.0885
15.8648
4.0854
6.1129
1.6192
2.0158
6.7108
5.124
93%
SODIUM
(PP«n)
0.17
0.48
0.40
0.10
0.61
1.10
6.49
0.98
8.01
1.20
9.81
0.76
5.42
1.30
4.48
1.00
3.18
0.82
2.57
0.91
3.36
1.30
6.16
0.80
5.59
1.10
2.70
1.20
10.70
205.32
213.20
203.33
211.32
5.60
52.30
Percent
Drift
0.0163
0.0208
0.0259
0.0108
0.0080
0.0140
0.0054
0.0081
0.014
Percent
Drift
(T-test)
0.0163
0.0208
0.0259
0.0108
0.0080
0.0140
0.0054
0.0081
0.014
51%
DETECTION LIMIT
0.01
0.05
-------
Cooling Tower Test
EEI #3644
BLANKS
Analysis and Drift Data (UoM Analysis)
STRONTIUM Percent Percent TITANIUM Percent Percent
DI Water
Nitric Acid
Filter, 47mm qtz
Filter, Whatman 41
Filter, Pflex qtz
Fan
No.
C2
C2
C3
C3
C3
C3
C2
C2
Cl
Cl
Cl
Cl
C2
C2
C3
C3
C3
C3
C2
C2
C4
C4
C4
C4
Type
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/LO
CTI/LO
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/LO
CTI/LO
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/LO
CTI/LO
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/LO
CTI/LO
Run
No.
1
1
1
1
2
2
3
3
1
1
2
2
5
5
3
3
4
4
7
7
1
1
2
2
Matrix
F
N
F
N
F
N
F
N
F
N
F
N
F
N
F
N
F
N
F
N
F
N
F
N
Average
Rel.
Std. D
COOLING WATER (ppm)
Run 1
Run 2
Run 3
Run 4
AUDITS (ppm)
(ppm)
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.02
0.02
0.04
0.02
0.04
0.02
0.06
0.03
0.03
0.02
0.03
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.08
0.02
0.05
0.02
0.04
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.08
Drift
Low
High
2.03
2,09
1.99
2.08
0.58
5.58
Drift
(T-test)
Drift
0.0098
0.0119
0.0135
0.0085
0.0043
0.0104
0.009
0.0098
0.0119
0.0135
0.0085
0.0043
0.0104
0.0060 0.0060
0.0059 0.0059
0.009
36%
ND
0.01
0.44
0.06
0.04
0.10
0.03
0.54
0.03
0.05
0.03
0.07
0.02
0.07
0.02
0.27
0.01
0.04
0.03
0.08
0.08
0.04
0.02
0.08
0.01
0.06
0.03
0.04
0.08
0.07
0.07
0.07
0.07
0.00
0.00
Drift
(T-test)
1.1788 1.1788
9.5019
0.4836 0.4836
0.4941 0.4941
0.5707 0.5707
6.9473
0.1792 0.1792
0.5167 0.5167
2.484
0.571
58%
DETECTION LIMIT
0.00
0.01
-------
Cooling Tower Test
EEI #3644
BLANKS
DI Water
Nitric Acid
Filter, 47mm qtz
Filter, Whatman 41
Fan
No.
C2
C2
C3
C3
C3
C3
C2
C2
Cl
Cl
Cl
Cl
C2
C2
C3
C3
C3
C3
C2
C2
C4
C4
C4
C4
Filter,
Type
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/LO
CTI/LO
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/LO
CTI/LO
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/LO
CTI/LO
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/LO
CTI/LO
ZINC
(ppm)
0.05
0.25
0.02
0.01
Pflex qtz ND
Run
No.
1
1
1
1
2
2
3
3
1
1
2
2
5
5
3
3
4
4
7
7
1
1
2
2
Matrix
F
N
F
N
F
N
F
N
F
N
F
N
F
N
F
N
F
N
F
N
F
N
F
N
0.00
0.94
0.02
1.17
0.06
1.25
0.00
0.49
0.02
0.43
0.00
0.38
0.00
1.17
0.04
1.17
0.02
0.71
0.04
0.47
0.38
7.28
0.58
1.11
Average
Rel.
Std. D
COOLING WATER (ppm)
Run
Run
Run
Run
1
2
3
4
0.12
0.08
0.02
0.02
AUDITS (ppm)
Low
High
5.23
48.90
Analysis and Drift Data (UoM Analysis)
Percent Percent
Drift
Drift
(T-test)
2.7680 2.7680
4.2319 4.2319
4.7898 4.7898
1.2507
1.2671
0.6423
26.0170
1.2507
1.2671
0.6423
6.6882 6.6882
5.957
3.091
72%
DETECTION LIMIT
0.02
-------
Cooling Tower Test
EEI #3644
BLANKS
Analysis and Concentration Data (UoM Analysis)
ALUMINU Cone. Cone. CALCIUM Cone. Cone. CHROMIU Cone. Cone. COPPER Cone. Cone.
ug ug/dscm ug/dscm ug ug/dscm ug/dscm
(T-test)
(T-test)
Fan
No.
C2
C3
C3
C2
C1
C1
C2
C3
C3
C2
C4
C4
Type
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/LO
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/LO
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/LO
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/LO
Run DSCM
No.
1 10.63
1 10.76
2 6.29
3 14.83
1 15.52
2 8.69
5 16.52
3 15.06
4 8.60
7 20.92
1 26.39
2 10.16
Average
Rel. Std. Dev.
109.20
33.60
61.80
62.00
43.80
21.60
90.00
83.80
127.60
35.60
135.60
113.60
10.2728 10.2728
3.1227 3.1227
9.8251 9.8251
4.1807 4.1807
2.8222 2.8222
2.4856 2.4856
5.4479 5.4479
1.7017 1.7017
4.982 4.982
67%
200.00
249.00
168.00
160.00
170.00
134.00
190.00
98.00
400.00
289.00
240.00
640.00
18.8147 18.8147
23.1413 23.1413
26.7091 26.7091
10.7889 10.7889
10.9536 10.9536
15.4200 15.4200
11.5012 11.5012
13.8145 13.8145
16.393 16.393
36%
COOLING WATER (ppm)
Run1
Run 2
Run 3
Run 4
0.20
0.10
0.07
0.05
369.27
378.28
357.97
370.80
AUDITS (ppm)
Low
High
5.10
49.70
0.89
4.90
11.20
6.64
2.80
3.16
0.78
1.88
11.52
33.30
69.76
77.24
339.40
971.84
ug/dscm ug/dscm
(T-test)
1.0536 1.0536
0.6171 0.6171
0.4452 0.4452
0.2131 0.2131
0.0503 0.0503
0.2163 0.2163
0.6973 0.6973
3.6922
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.01
5.20
49.10
0.873
0.470
74%
ug ug/dscm ug/dscm
(T-test)
9.72
8.90
6.37
2.50
1.53
2.36
5.02
14.31
4.34
7.88
38.11
65.88
0.10
0.06
0.04
0.04
5.18
50.20
0.9140 0.9140
0.8268 0.8268
1.0124 1.0124
0.1683 0.1683
0.0985 0.0985
0.271 1 0.271 1
0.3036 0.3036
0.3765 0.3765
0.496 0.496
73%
DETECTION LIMIT
0.10
2.00
0.05
0.01
-------
Cooling Tower Test
EEI #3644
BLANKS
Analysis and Concentration Data (UoM Analysis)
IRON Cone. Cone. MAGNESIU Cone.
Cone. MANGANE Cone. Cone.
ug ug/dscm ug/dscm
(T-test)
Fan
No.
C2
C3
C3
C2
C1
C1
C2
C3
C3
C2
C4
C4
Type
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/LO
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/LO
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/LO
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/LO
Run DSCM
No.
1 10.63
1 10.76
2 6.29
3 14.83
1 15.52
2 8.69
5 16.52
3 15.06
4 8.60
7 20.92
1 26.39
2 10.16
Average
Rel. Std. Dev
62.80
49.00
27.20
30.12
19.52
47.88
65.68
201.60
279.00
337.56
1390.00
4382.20
5.9078 5.9078
4.5539 4.5539
4.3243 4.3243
2.0310 2.0310
1.2577 1.2577
5.5098 5.5098
3.9758 3.9758
16.1358
5.462 3.937
44%
COOLING WATER (ppm)
Run 1
Run 2
Run3
Run 4
0.44
0.18
0.11
0.06
AUDITS (ppm)
Low
High
5.37
51.10
ug
64.98
94.98
47.44
63.08
47.44
46.98
44.98
34.44
149.28
104.98
35.44
243.68
ug/dscm ug/dscm
(T-test)
6.1129 6.1129
8.8271 8.8271
7.5421 7.5421
4.2535 4.2535
3.0567 3.0567
5.4062 5.4062
2.7228 2.7228
5.0182 5.0182
109.29
113.13
108.18
111.14
5.20
49.70
5.367
5.367
39%
ug/dscm ug/dscm
(T-test)
SODIUM Cone. Cone.
ug ug/dscm ug/dscm
(T-test)
8.63 0.8119
6.63 0.6162
29.33 4.6630
9.03 0.6089
12.89 0.8305
1.91 0.2198
4.20 0.2542
7.03
14.75
18.43 0.8810
307.93
487.55
1.111
0.04
0.02
0.02
0.02
5.13
49.00
0.8119 289.40 27.2248
0.6162 338.20 31.4312
245.60 39.0461
0.6089 212.60 14.3358
0.8305 149.00 9.6005
0.2198 147.00 16.9160
0.2542 104.60 6.3317
87.60
296.20
0.8810 223.40 10.6788
93.40
467.80
0.603 19.446
45%
205.32
213.20
203.33
211.32
5.60
52.30
27.2248
31.4312
39.0461
14.3358
9.6005
16.9160
6.3317
10.6788
19.446
60%
DETECTION LIMIT
0.03
0.08
0.01
0.05
-------
Cooling Tower Test
EEI #3644
BLANKS
STRONTIU Cone. Cone.
ug ug/dscm ug/dscm
(T-test)
Analysis and Concentration Data (UoM Analysis)
TITANIUM Cone. Cone. ZINC Cone
ug ug/dscm ug/dscm ug ug/ds
(T-test)
Fan
No.
C2
C3
C3
C2
C1
C1
C2
C3
C3
C2
C4
C4
Type
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/LO
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/LO
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/LO
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/LO
Run
No.
1
1
2
3
1
2
5
3
4
7
1
2
DSCM
10.63
10.76
6.29
14.83
15.52
8.69
16.52
15.06
8.60
20.92
26.39
10.16
1.72
1.92
1.26
1.64
0.79
1.06
1.12
1.88
2.36
1.60
0.73
3.40
0.1622
0.1788
0.2006
0.1109
0.0510
0.1224
0.0680
0.0767
0.1622
0.1788
0.2006
0.1109
0.0510
0.1224
0.0680
0.0767
6.94
51.28
1.52
3.14
3.46
23.56
1.12
5.38
0.88
4.46
2.96
3.30
0.6529
4.7658
0.2417
0.2117
02229
2.7112
0.0678
0.2132
0.6529
0.2417
0.2117
0.2229
2.7112
0.0678
0.2132
27.80
38.96
25.68
9.56
9.24
2.62
36.96
40.96
11.36
13.12
319.36
75.28
2.6152
3.6208
4.0827
0.6446
0.5954
0.3015
2.2373
0.6272
2.6152
3.6208
4.0827
0.6446
0.5954
0.3015
2.2373
0.6272
Average
Pel. Std. Dev
0.121
0.121
45%
1.136
0.617
152%
COOLING WATER (ppm)
Run 1
Run 2
Run 3
Run 4
2.03
2.09
1.99
2.08
0.07
0.07
0.07
0.07
AUDITS (ppm)
Low
High
0.58
5.58
0.00
0.00
DETECTION LIMIT
0.00
0.01
0.02
-------
Cooling Tower Test
EEI #3644
BLANKS
Analysis and Concentration Data (RTI Analysis)
ALUMINU Cone.
Cone.
BORON Cone.
Cone.
CALCIUM Cone.
Cone.
ug ug/dscm ug/dscm
(T-test)
ug ug/dscm ug/dscm
(T-test)
ug ug/dscm ug/dscm
(T-test)
CHROMIU Cone. Cone.
ug ug/dscm ug/dscm
(T-test)
Fan
No.
C2
C2
C3
C2
C2
C1
C2
C2
C3
Type
CTI/HI
CTI/LO
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/LO
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/LO
CTI/HI
Run
No.
1
2
1
3
4
1
5
6
3
DSCM
10.63
5.86
10.76
14.83
8.34
15.52
16.52
9.14
15.06
45.24
17.24
49.64
67.00
33.00
28.00
58.00
61.36
58.00
4.2559
2.9420
4.6134
4.5179
3.9568
1.8041
3.5109
6.7133
4.2559
2.9420
4.6134
4.5179
3.9568
1.8041
3.5109
6.7133
3.88
2.98
7.98
7.28
15.10
10.20
5.44
8.06
6.70
0.3650
0.5085
0.7416
0.4909
1.8106
0.6572
0.3293
0.8818
0.3650
0.5085
0.7416
0.4909
0.6572
0.3293
0.8818
38.30
28.30
69.40
49.30
21.86
66.00
51.50
24.70
30.00
3.6030
4.8294
6.4498
3.3243
2.6211
4.2526
3.1174
2.7024
3.6030
4.8294
6.4498
3.3243
2.6211
4.2526
3.1174
2.7024
2.94
1.88
3.20
3.84
1.88
1.46
3.30
1.88
2.10
0.2766
0.3208
0.2974
0.2589
0.2254
0.0941
0.1998
0.2057
0.2766
0.3208
0.2974
0.2589
0.2254
0.0941
0.1998
0.2057
C2
C2
C4
CTI/HI
CTI/LO
CTI/HI
7
8
1
20.92
8.30
26.39
36.00
82.96
27.84
1.7208
9.9952
1.7208
5.88
7.12
5.80
0.2811
0.8578
0.2811
0.8578
47.90
34.90
64.20
2.2897
4.2048
2.2897
4.2048
4.30
2.42
3.04
0.2055
0.2916
0.2055
0.2916
Average
Rel. Std. Dev.
COOLING WATER (ppm)
Run1
Run 2
Run 3
Run 4
0.20
0.10
0.07
0.05
4.403
3.782
41%
9.33
11.50
12.26
12.00
0.692
0.568
40%
369.27
378.28
357.97
370.80
3.739
3.739
33%
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.238
0.238
28%
AUDITS (ppm)
Low
High
4.49
44.80
ND
ND
0.11
0.81
5.05
47.40
DETECTION LIMIT
0.14
0.01
0.00
0.01
-------
Cooling Tower Test
EEI #3644
Analysis and Concentration Data (RTI Analysis)
BLANKS
Fan
No.
C2
C2
C3
C2
C2
C1
C2
C2
C3
C2
C2
C4
Type
CTI/HI
CTI/LO
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/LO
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/LO
CTI/HI
CTI/HI
CTI/LO
CTI/HI
Run
No.
1
2
1
3
4
1
5
6
3
7
8
1
DSCM
10.63
5.86
10.76
14.83
8.34
15.52
16.52
9.14
15.06
20.92
8.30
26.39
COPPER Cone. Cone.
ug ug/dscm ug/dscm
(T-test)
7.36
5.06
8.16
2.04
1.54
1.92
1.80
1.36
21.64
4.08
1.68
1.56
0.6924
0.8635
0.7584
0.1376
0.1847
0.1237
0.1090
0.1488
0.1950
0.2024
0.6924
0.8635
0.7584
0.1376
0.1847
0.1237
0.1090
0.1488
0.1950
0.2024
IRON Cone. Cone. MAGNESI Cone. Cone. MANGAN Cone. Cone.
ug ug/dscm ug/dscm
(T-test)
38.88
22.14
49.98
35.98
19.32
29.96
28.28
50.94
147.68
55.96
52.74
44.40
3.6576
3.7782
4.6450
2.4262
2.3165
1.9304
1.7119
5.5733
2.6750
6.3542
3.6576
3.7782
4.6450
2.4262
2.3165
1.9304
1.7119
5.5733
2.6750
6.3542
ug ug/dscm ug/dscm
(T-test)
61.30
10.20
85.50
53.30
41.90
74.40
35.40
55.90
58.40
85.90
60.90
46.70
5.7667
1.7406
7.9461
3.5941
5.0240
4.7938
2.1429
6.1160
4.1061
7.3373
5.7667
1.7406
7.9461
3.5941
5.0240
4.7938
2.1429
6.1160
4.1061
7.3373
ug ug/dscm ug/dscm
(T-test)
7.16
23.60
4.90
6.98
0.80
19.52
3.48
0.82
4.56
3.86
1.08
3.78
0.6736
4.0273
0.4554
0.4707
0.0959
1.2577
0.2107
0.0897
0.1845
0.1301
0.6736
0.4554
0.4707
0.0959
1.2577
0.2107
0.0897
0.1845
0.1301
Average
Rel. Std. Dev.
COOLING WATER (ppm)
Run 1
Run 2
Run 3
Run 4
0.342
AUDITS (ppm)
Low
High
0.10
0.06
0.04
0.04
5.17
49.20
0.342
88%
3.507
0.44
0.18
0.11
0.06
5.19
50.00
3.507
45%
4.857
109.29
113.13
108.18
111.14
4.79
46.40
4.857
42%
0.760
0.04
0.02
0.02
0.02
4.76
46.40
0.396
96%
DETECTION LIMIT
0.03
0.02
0.00
0.00
-------
Cooling Tower Test
EEI #3644
BLANKS
Analysis and Concentration Data (RTI Analysis)
Fan Type
No.
C2 CTI/HI
C2 CTI/LO
C3 CTI/HI
C2
C2
C4
Run DSCM
No.
1 10.63
2 5.86
1 10.76
C2 CTI/HI 3
C2 CTI/LO 4
C1 CTI/HI 1
C2 CTI/HI 5
C2 CTI/LO 6
C3 CTI/HI 3
CTI/HI
CTI/LO
CTI/HI
7
8
1
14.83
8.34
15.52
16.52
9.14
15.06
20.92
8.30
26.39
Average
Pel. Std. Dev.
COOLING WATER (ppm)
Run1
Run 2
Run 3
Run 4
AUDITS (ppm)
SODIUM Cone.
Cone.
ug ug/dscm ug/dscm
(T-test)
STRONTI Cone.
Low
High
27.00
23.30
48.80
31.56
22.72
26.78
17.12
14.60
13.96
18.72
16.16
8.34
205.32
213.20
203.33
211.32
0.49
5.41
2.5400
3.9761
4.5353
2.1281
2.7242
1.7255
1.0363
1.5974
0.8948
1.9470
2.310
2.5400
3.9761
4.5353
2.1281
2.7242
1.7255
1.0363
1.5974
0.8948
1.9470
2.310
51%
Cone.
ug ug/dsem ug/dscm
(T-test)
1.60 0.1505 0.1505
1.12 0.1911 0.1911
1.74 0.1617 0.1617
1.20
0.76
1.00
0.96
0.98
3.02
1.24
1.24
0.60
2.03
2.09
1.99
2.08
0.51
5.05
0.0809
0.0911
0.0644
0.0581
0.1072
0.0593
0.1494
0.111
0.0809
0.0911
0.0644
0.0581
0.1072
0.0593
0.1494
0.111
43%
TANIUM Cone. Cone. ZINC Cone. Cone.
ug ug/dscm ug/dscm ug ug/dscm ug/dscm
(T-test) (T-test)
6.52
1.94
57.36
3.68
4.64
4.74
1.60
1.84
6.64
3.40
10.58
2.66
0.07
0.07
0.07
0.07
ND
0.01
0.6134 0.6134 27.76 2.6115
0.3311 0.3311 16.06 2.7406
5.3309 29.96 2.7844
0.2481 0.2481 7.66 0.5165
0.5564 0.5564 14.16 1.6978
0.3054 0.3054 5.28 0.3402
0.0969 0.0969 27.96 1.6925
0.2013 0.2013 9.60 1.0503
32.02
0.1625 0.1625 10.04 0.4799
1.2747 1.2747 7.86 0.9470
246.62
0.912 0.421 1.486
86%
0.12
0.08
0.02
0.02
4.96
48.50
2.6115
2.7406
2.7844
0.5165
1.6978
0.3402
1.6925
1.0503
0.4799
0.9470
1.486
65%
DETECTION LIMIT
0.03
0.00
0.01
0.01
-------
APPENDIX B
FIELD AND ANALYTICAL DATA
-------
NOTE: Sample custody teams and isokinetic sampling teams used different
numbers to refer to samples. Below is a list of references to associate sample
analysis numbers to the run numbers reported earlier in the report:
Date Sampling Run Number
July 9 C2 CTD/HI 1
C2 CTD/LO 2
C3 CTD/HI 1
C3 CTD/LO 2
July 10 C2 CTD/HI 3
C2 CTD/LO 4
Cl CTD/HI 1
Cl CTD/LO 2
July 11 C2 CTD/HI 5
C2 CTD/LO 6
C3 CTD/HI 3
C3 CTD/LO 4
July 12 C2 CTD/HI 7
C2 CTD/LO 8
C4 CTD/HI 1
C4 CTD/LO 2
Analysis Run Number
2-CTI/HMA
2-CTI/LO-1B
3-CTI/HI-1C
3-CTI/LO-1D
2-CTI/HI-2A
2-CTI/LO-2B
1-CTI/HI-2C
1-CTI/LO-2D
2-CTI/HI-3A
2-CTI/LO-3B
3-CTI/HI-3C
3-CTI/LO-3D
2-CTI/HI-4A
2-CTI/LO-4B
4-CTI/HI-4C
4-CTI/LO-4D
-------
ISOKINETTO
FIE3LO DATA
COMPANY
ADDRESS
SA
DA
BA
TB
TB
NAME
PITOTS, POSTTEST METER
V-i- M3 SAMPLING SYS/TED BAG UMBIL
"^^THERMOCOUPLE @ ^A PRE SAMPL
^/THERMOCOUPLE @ ^/-""POST PROBE
"
FILTER f TARE DEI
MET
ESI
C F
TA Hg
ER TEMP
. %H2O
ACTOR
IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS
NT BOX
BOX^t;
ICAL
NOZZLE
E BOX
(/-2--V PITOT 76
/ D'D
T/C
T/C
DIAMETEB
READOUT
PROBE /f
HoO ^ 0
-2£J
-(33 r
ORSAT PUMP 2
^_ TEDLAR BAG $
^f.-i
.n/
STACK TEMP 1C
REF DELTA P , ^T#3
' V_B
L
I
H
S
1
2
SAMPLE
POINT
(~\
~1
3 -^
* -</
5
6
7
CLOCK
TIME
MINUTES
C?
Of
^^
'ACTOR
z / c*
-/
4
>
5
P '
DRY GAS METER
READINGS
CUBIC FEET
ft^W 6^
^Z^t/' £/ ,
V7^f i 'n
''iOy^r *[!(? , V~7
-^ hv%
-(,
f> -' s
T -2
faiVu
'Si ^v
^
9 -^ 1 ^}/>
10 _
-"?>
-U
-s
-fc7
ll-lK
-~i~
**>
f~,
o
Ti '/>--
iS7^V
77 ^
L3-'V
J-V/u
f^'/i-
^1^-
7f %y
f)7 /^
/"?
'2>L\1/^
^Yn
I7W
^fr
4i-
PITOT
READING
IS. H?O
,2.^7
-^^(9
, i^"7?
' ? o
^^7,6*2, 1 ,C^
7A^.^2,
^7<^( ^^^
^^^ ^r-
[77^
- in
, ^x"
, T^?
/ C6
,q-<5
75r,nir ^r4
LI^ ^3?
(^ ^ ,^2-
'//5^,-GiO
/^^. 6f)
2/ 1-/,7i / / / / Z
i6P. 19c?
<2-?7, 07
3 / ^ , ^7 ~b
r^ ^^ ^ y f^y^ &
) / ^t - \j n
^7 I t/ ^ y
^>H , 6^T
IH 27,16-'
^^
,^
4 ,7
r^"
/> 6^
-11-
L
T/y
-^
y^^
,4V
, o
ORIFICE SETTIHG
IN. H2O
IDEAL
,63
/,*33-
/, t^
^1?
1,14)
1<^
/,v
,^V
/, 11
«^
./D
l,j,(?
! ~7%
*^?^7
/ ^3f
,^1f
/.<3
,^s
2, ^?>
/ ^? jO
I I ^y
/ i^^"
ACTUAL
,6"^
//7.^-^
(,*!&
/,V~b
/,76
^C"
', ^-c?
'C
<^\
,'k>i
,1,1
c^<~?
[)ft
/ (71
^
^^
\OO
Ibl
(nb
f-.
"T^
T '~~}_
\
Z\
q-
t^
^
£
"2,
e^
C-7
£
£
i,
10
tfd
^f-4
^"-f
^3
^6
!
,.
pi '
mlnuCM
Vm
ts
-------
_|_ »=> V_SXX._1--L>4 f* -1- -J- 'i -1. -^ .f J-J J-- -*. J*-***-^ .1^.^ .>. -1. .*. *. _~
COMPANY NAME
ADDRESS e---irr>^
5/-A* -
^>
/1J
SAMPLING LOCATION Ce><.(,-^ ^^-^ <_*'<{ &
DATE ~7 / O ^0 TEAM LEADER A1. L-A/
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE. IN. HG
TRAIN LEAK CHECK VACUUM IN.
TRAIN LEAK RATE, CU.FT/MIN
EQUIPMENT CHECKS
_^_ PITOTS, PRETEST
t-^"' PITOTS , POSTTEST
k/A- M3 SAMPLING SYS /TED BAG
"^THERMOCOUPLE <§ _^
^^THERMOCOUPLE @ £
FILTER # TARE
.<; PRE
/
TDELTA
METER
EST. ^
C FACT
STACK
REF DI
K-FAC:
^D C1
RUN NUMBER- ^ 7 '^ />
Du^-u«/uvr»-<- ^ TIME START -T - p
1, TIME FINISH ; ^ ', C^-
TECHNICIANS t^xAf
STATIC PRESSURE IN. HoO -^- ~O
HGl£^_2_
IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS
REAGENT BOX
METER BOX/xJk-V
UMBILICAL
SAMPLE BOX
_ NOZZLE DIAMETER ^27^
3F L 1 ^ (.. T/C READOUT /(> 4
T/C PROBE ;,r?-3
ORSAT PUMP ., ,\
PROBE f'-J-^ PITOT 3 ^ TEDLAR BAG ly '
Ha |/r#f
TEMP / £r&
liH-jO H. ^~
COR , %3T
TEMP '-T C~~
:LTA p .'3c~7
COR ?T&2-D
FYRITE
i
| j"? [J, ,^m
*"
LEAK CHECK
. READINGS
1
3
2
r
r.
3
4
3
5
3
6
CLOCK
SAMPL2 TIME
POINT I MINUTES
DRY GAS METER
READINGS
CUBIC FEET
PITOT
READING
ORXFICE SETTIHC
IN. H2O
IDEAL ACTUAL
GAS
METER
TEMP.
F
VACUUM
IN. HG
GAUGE
GAS TEMPERATURES
FILTER
BOX
IHPINGER
EXIT
STACK
TEMP.
'F
LK!
CHKj
I \
C~l \ b
100
3
eii>
3
4
5
6
7
a
_9|
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
IB
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
37
.27
**?
,bft
r
5"
s
^
.oft I
,c
. "7 -6
-7-70,^0
7/
/J f;
67
'/Y
r
D/
-47
./o
nl
F1010
mlnutaa
vn
(V/\p)
-------
DATA.
COMPANY
ADDRESS
NAME
Srrt^ 2. '
SAMPLING LOCATION ri.^ C>LL
DATE 01-t& -^
g(f\& ^f 3<^ fS" RUN NUMBER ,7 - Z A
TIME
.jt-2_ ' TIME
START £?H£?
FINISH
1^02-
r, TKAM T.KAPRR -Rl?..^ TECHNICIANS ^T- &F»£>?t£.l<-
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE. IN. HG
TRAIN LEAK CHECK VACUUM IN.
TRAIN LEAK RATE, CU.FT/MIN
EQUIPMENT CHECKS
I/" PIT*
PIT
M3
STATIC PRESSURE IN.
HGo-S-8 ^
IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS
REAGENT BOX
METER BOX ^
UMBILICAL
NOZZLE
M Y /.DZ.2-
Ar
SAMPLE BOX A
PROBE
H@
TEMP
SH2°
TOR
((.^ PITOT
T/C !
T/C
ORSA'
TE1
DIAMETER
READOUT
PROBE _g
H?0 £>
O-- > "^ 1
f-i& i
s " t C^ ^ 1
r PUMP ^/^ 2
DLAR BAG ti/fi \
o 1.'S.(_X
1 K- FACTOR
I
N
E
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SAMPLE
POINT
1L '
2.
3
<4*
^-
4=
<£ \
z.
T>
-/
S"
L.
P- {
z.
3
c/
5"
-'
3
4-
S"
<-
P1010 '
12/89
Pi
CLOCK
TIME
HIHUTB3
P>/o
jC'/'Z-
"b^4
5/'{^
C'/2_
e<*
<&kjo
\-L*/4
2S'/i_
4*?
6.2,t
^~ t> o ^ "^
^ CJ -1-*, j "T_* _/-
->,P,U2
^3C.4S"
3^3.^0
ij^f^--^^
' ^ ' ' V /T"^
j^"^V j *?*l 1
-B0!
z.
rxKlia |
4
L
i
s
I
°p^S^
PITOT
READIHG
IN. H20
£>- "3>S
0 . V^
£>. ^"S
£> S^.
0, 5")
e>
. 1?
£> . 2.3
o-Vg
O.^6
o 5»
^ .5-*,
o
,2-5"
C) . Z.S
o> 3^
O-bS
&.*&*
&^(e
/O. og
£> . 2_2_
0.3^
£> ^3>
£> .^lp
^>. ^u
£5 \t>
0
minute* VB (V
to)2
QRIPICB SETTISG
IH. H2O
IDEAL
/ p4
1 . *>?-
/. ^3
/. 5^
.Vo
lp_ ^G
D Ui>
/,2_<«.
/.32-
/.3C
o.tg
£>-3^>
/>.§§
/-oQ,
/.z.^
/. Ho
0 i2.
ii. Uo
*(
C>.tT
ACTUAL
I £>i-
/.'/3
^5"b
).^Q
o. 3**
^^ J«^ ^
I ^ Kv
1-3-2-
f. i>C
(.V(o
0-Lg
b.Tft
D.g'g
l.oQ.
1-2-^"
/ e<.
-O. 2.2.
D-CaO
l.-o)
/ <-/3
! Vrv
(tip
Ci.^
GAS
METEH
TEMP.
'7
^^~
gc,
? 2-
q^
14-
°l ^
lo
/.£>' 1
/0^_
/D^
/e>^
1 ^O
/pp
ID/
/£>/
iPf
loo
°\8
°\^r
'Wi
O/
lOP
VACUUM
IH. HG
GAUGE
^_
2_
2^
^
^/'
i?
7.
->
<^
^
4
2L
3
3
5
^
J
1
i.
3
,5-
5-
4
GAS TEMPBKATURKS
FiLTiat
BOX
y
A///J-
*
IMPINGES
EXIT
*?
xJ/A'
'
(^4°i q^-
/\H ta
LEAK CHECK
READINGS
STACK
TEMP.
*F
-?"?
^0
Oj /
ft(?
#5-
£<*
S^~
£§
?^
<^g
9/
<^g
|£A
^ f
9c
9S~
9 t
92.
C5
-------
JL J- -c- -
COMPANY NAMB £ rTS. ** Z - &
ADDRESS
SAMPLING LOCATION V~Ati GEto.
~M A -^ 3^2."S~ RUN NUMBER *2. ' i ^>
TIME START ^HC>«-^£> TEAM LEADER 6 ?+*>& TECHNICIANS 7~. &K &£_<£ <-J
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE. IN. HG
TRAIN LEAK CHECK VACUUM IN.
TRAIN LEAK RATE, CU.FT/MIN
EQUIPMENT CHECKS
t/PITOTS, PRETEST
PITOTS, POSTTEST
A//A: M3 SAMPLING SYS/1
~& THERMOCOUPLE @ -!j
THERMOCOUPLE @
'ED BAG
*£_ PRE
POST
FILTER # TARE
DELTA
METER
EST. *
3O. ^3 STATIC PRESSURE IN. H2O _£i
HG J-T ^"
IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS
REAGENT BOX NOZZLE DIAMETER O.i'fcr
METER BOX WC. -| Y i-Cx^O T/C READOUT ^2,8 /
UMBILICAL (S T/C PROBE ^-{S^ 1
SAMPLE BOX fo ORSAT PUMP ^A
PROBE 11.°! PITOT TEDLAR BAG /^^
Hfl \.^>
TEMP / DO
SH-jO "Y.r^
C FACTOR /.^y?
STACK
TEMP 9^.,
REF DELTA P ^-3/<7
K- FACTOR ^ 1-7 2,
1
FYRITE
CTȣiS'e
I
^
>
1
2
f
1
3
4
1
5
1
6
L
REAMNCS
w^SJ
.
V
52.
Li.
zs'A.
11
iT
1
IS
SAMPLE
POIHT
^T f?
6-
X
3
-4
U
CLOCK
TIME
MINUTES
DRT GAS METER
READINGS
CUBIC FEET
1 13. 06. "7-
/2J-01,
7gt
PITOT
READING
£> - 38
£> -
D
0 53
P,
ORIFICE SETTIHG
IN. H2O
IDEAL
2. l°l
3^8
ACTUAL
3. CO
33
2..&T-
3. -08
WS
z.o
GAS
METER
TEMP.
VACUUM
IN. HG
GAUGE
a
2_
2_
3
GAS TEMPERATURES
BOX
'F
EXIT
STACK
TEMP.
7
88
LK
CHK
1
Li
2-
8
F1010
12/89
Pi
inute*
/\H
-------
TEST LOG
k^''-
Plant flame:
Sampling Location:
TV; V<
^ i
/Y-VIX > /(
Initials
<-L*ft*le-/
/f ^*,s
-I-A
u/
r-oooe
a/86
-------
FUESUH.TS
OlSf
Plant Namet CCOLIMG f
Sampling Location! OvJT^ «" ATM 2_
Data Received:
Data Analyzed:
BBI Raff
Reagent Box(ea)t
Run Number :
Run Date:
ZA
cn/n
?£>
7/.c
5 /90
/
/90
ANALYSIS OF MOISTURE CATCH
Reagent 1 ( . I M
?inal Weight, g.
Tared Weight, g.
Water Catch, g.
Reagent 2 (
Final Weight, g.
Tared Weight, g.
Water Catch,g.
Reagent 3 (
Final Weight, g.
Tared Weight, g.
Water Catch,g.
CONDENSED WATER, g.
Silica Gel:
Final Weight, g.
Tared Weight, g.
Absorbed Water, g.
/Z5Q.O
I Jl-fc,
400. o
TOTAL WATER COLLECTED, g.
(circle one)
Triple beajo^or Electronic
Balance I
NOTESt
-------
Plant Namei (jcou\ *
Sampling Location!
Date Received:
~ >-
Date Analyzed:
BBZ Reff
Reagent Eox(ea)i
Run Number:
Run Data:
2 L CT
51 O
NOTES:
-------
COMPANY NAME
ADDRESS
SAMPLING LOCATION 4-A>J {£.
RUN NUMBER 2- ~ *5> &
TIME START 0/^3^-
U^* Z. TIME
FINISH
fCz.1^
DATE frt-([-*[Q TEAM LEADER & . ^DO TECHNICIANS T. 6<2-s>^£L<
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE. IN. HG
TRAIN LEAK CHECK VACUUM IN.
TRAIN LEAK RATE, CU.FT/MIN
EQUIPMENT CHECKS
iX PITOTS, PRETEST
^PITOTS, POSTTEST
M^ M3 SAMPLING SYS/TED BAG
(x- THERMOCOUPLE @ ^ PRE
<-' THERMOCOUPLE @ 83""POST
FILTER * TARE
DELTA
METER
EST. \
3O.O STATIC PRESSURE IN. H?O O
HG 15- S~
o.ec.4 d.c5=^I
'
IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS
REAGENT BOX NOZZLE DIAMETEI
METER BOX ^ 4 Y [,£>££- T/C READOUT
t o . >-t^
UMBILICAL & T/C PROBE ^-.A/? -0,^4^-
STACK
TEMP <:?-5' .<^4 Ci.Cc.gfc,
K-FACTOR Z.f-^Z- -Z..
J ^t/A
FYRITE
Cp^£
LEAK CHECK
READINGS
I
1
f
)
2
;
)
3
)
4
f
)
5
ft
)
6
j.
SAMPLE
POINT
CLOCK
TIME
MINUTES
DRY GAS METER
READINGS
CUBIC TEST
PITOT
READING
IN. H0
CJRITICE SETTING
IN. H20
IDEAL ACTUAL
GAS
METEH
TEMP.
p
VACUUM
IN. HO
GAUGE
P1! Lili'lllr
STACK
TEMP.
y
LK
CHK
P.
63
loo.
,3
a
, g e
66
86
v
6*7
12/
4
l.s-s-
_si
lo
o.
6§
0.30*
/oof.
St.
S"f. 81
fie
I.2.S
-4
«/
C-
1-2-1-
6*
O.S'S
JL
D.3^
25
P1010
12/89
Pi
Inuta*
65-
-------
COMPANY NAMB ^ ,-pg; ^^ 2-~
ADDRESS
SAMPLING LOCATION fyfjj Q£
^
} i &
A *
i^
DATE AT-// ^ ii TEAM LEADER £>,£u?C>
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE. IN. HG
TRAIN LEAK CHECK VACUUM IN.
TRAIN LEAK RATE, CU.FT/MIN
EQUIPMENT CHECKS
iX PITOTS, PRETEST
t/ PITOTS, POSTTEST
A/A-M3 SAMPLING SYS/TED BAG
!<: THERMOCOUPLE @ ^D _ PRE
"3^ THERMOCOUPLE @ 8^ POST
FILTER # TARE
DELTA
METER
EST. \
C FAC1]
STACK
REF DI
K-FAd
3£
HG j_
kr ^
r_ _5L
^'b'i.Z.^- RUN NUMBER <£- 3a '
TIME START <^> ^ ^«f 5
TIME FINISH / tn 2\\
TECHNICIANS ( .
STATIC PRESSURE IN.
~2>
£>fZ&*£
1. 1
!
IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS
REAGENT BOX
METER BOX (fflC -(
UMBILICAL 6
SAMPLE BOX #
PROBE
TEMP
iH20
fOR
TEMP
:LTA P
raR
NOZZLE DIAMETER Q, -z?5"
~Y / -DVCP T/C READOUT f"2^
T/C PROBE { (g^
ORSAT PUMP JJlk
/). °) PITOT TEDLAR BAG V/A-
/ 7?g
/^3C»
«7^"
0-2/1
^^ -
ITM.
/DO
. *>t 5
^ s* 1.^1.
3.6 rr
FYRITE
Cp4fl£
LEAK CHEC
READINGS'
i
1
i
8
2
1
a
3
9
4
a
5
t
S
6
SAMPLE
PQIHT
CLOCK
TIME
MINUTES
DOT GAS METER
HEADINGS
CUBIC FEBT
PITOT
MADISC
IN. HjO
SETTIHG
IN. H20
IDEAL ACTUAL
GAS
METEH
TEMP.
VACUUM
in. as
GAUGE
-aM-TEBPESXTTOBS
STACK
TEMP.
ca
?.£>/
n
15"
4
z
0.
/PO
2.0
/.PC/
8-
3
-f
2. a.
(U'/
3.3^
02.
4-
11
t-|l2
'/z-[u
14
15
16
17
5"
C.lP
-n
/*?
-------
ISOK.INETIC
FIEX-ID DATA SHEET
COMPANY
ADDRESS
NAME
D
TRAIN LEAK RATE, CU.FT/MIN » llT . L 6 C
HoO «_- (O
EQUIPMENT CHECKS
-7 PITOTS , PRETEST
^PITOTS, POSTTEST
V/MP
^.'THB
^ THE
FILTER
IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS
REAGENT BOX NOZZLE
METER BOX f/l/-> 'JP- '(/l?^
SAMPLING SYS/TED BAG UMBILICAL
RMOCOUPLE @ ^
O PRE SAMPLE BOX
RMOCOUPLE @ ^£<^POST PROBE
# TARE
W X M t~*
I
2
SAMPLE
POINT
/- /
. 1
CLCX3
TIME
MTHITTZS
n
f/'/y
3i -rz, lv/<-y
4
5
'<'
-f
DELTA H@
METER TEMP
EST. %H2O
C FACTOR
STACK TEMP
REF DELTA P
K- FACTOR
/ ; -, .
/ f >^
DIAMETER /7/C^?
T/C READOUT XV A-
T/C
PROBE /
? /?^
ORSAT PUMP J ,»
C PITOT ^ ^ TEDLAR BAG /i/7?*"""
,7^ /
/(90
.ni
'-f 0
? IS?"
^
?
FYRITE
C 2^
*
DRY GA3 METER
READINGS
CUBIC FEET
MTX ^-^
H<-# 0j.
^*r/ n
T^ n 6 , 3
'"f
«| -7 2T/2-
7J9- / d
/ 0 f /^/
al -^ /^?/u
9| -"2, I1U l.-^
10 i -w C2-'
iii -r1 -7^
12
-6
13 ! C- 'a
14
15
16
17
IB
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
-2-
-3
-a
-£
^ ;
-I
-I
-H
-l M
~^l ^f ^ ^
o
*n
16
~^,^(/J ^c|4p,7.4
C-sl/ty
-/ (
<1
^Mj£^
/4
«a^J/
. \
tftLffl,-^^
*m ,2-1
qq- s~, £>D
^s"7 1?#6
'W/.^JL
C1??7.3"7^
- / y /-vn
> y
/ ' i *** *OO*G .^
^
PITOT
READING
IN. H20
,lc
^^
'6<2
/c^
,''^h
.10
^(^
! ^6
, ^
/ /
<^~rf/x*
GAS
METER
TEMP.
T
VACUUM
IN. HG
GAUGE
^> f 7
^^
^?D
^
£-
/C
-£,
9d I £"
/^ I"7?
£7^2
^^/V
X^
^f
7
5?^ ~7
9(9
y ^*i?
v (^
^?f
V
T7
^-/
<57 ! ^-/
<7<£V ~7
o L /
^Q
no
7
-7
^ 7
?/?
^7
~3
LEAK CHECK
READINGS
3
1
r
3
2
3
3
3
4
B
5
a
G
GAS TEMPERATURES
FILTER
BOX
'r
/I//X^"
IMPINGER
EXIT
'T
STACK
TEMP.
(y/L /v ^
TT^
2f6
^ S
#£T
# i
^ ^^
^^>
LKi
CHKI
t
\
\
^6
i <7 ^ j
' J?"^-
n /)
^"3
^
U2- -2--
; O } 1
/V '
/s xj-*^^ 1 ^* ^/(3 jft^ ^?C/
i i:
t':.:
_
mlnutaa
Vm
-------
FIELD
~ 7
f 4
1 »
COMPANY
ADDRESS
SAMPL
DATE
BAROK
TRAIN
TRAIN
NAME
<~W,, ^o PITO NUMBER ' jj""^"^
ING LOCATION
~7 //- ^o
ETRIC PRESSC
LEAK CHECK
LEAK RATE,
/ ^-
(" * o ri, -
TEAM LEADER
IRE. IN. HG
VACUUM IN.
CU.FT/MIN
EQUIPMENT CHECKS
^ ..PITOTS, PRETEST
' /' PITOTS , POSTTEST
/'/A-M
(-S -
i 0 1 '/if
J/,V-/
~W Vu
[P-
2.
0
tf2
[0^%y
/73/v
3
/Tv'/^
"7 [
(?1
^
-t'/j-
/
"Z^Urti
**^p^=
^
^Ax^A,
>^/>
BAG
PRE
^ POST
Dl
Ml
E.
C
S*
R]
K
tTMT
' 4, ft TECHNICIANS
TIME
START "? i 5 ^
PT-NTSH <,"' O i
1,0 £? STATIC PRESSURE in.
HG'^1 _^
* frtr'S - 0 &>
REAGE1
METER
UMBIL
SAMPL
PROBE
SLTA Hg
2TER TEMP
ST. %H2O
FACTOR
PACK TEMP
EF DELTA P
-FACTOR
TDENTIFICATION NUMBERS
*IT BOX ^ NOZZLE_
ICAL
E BOX
//->.«-( PITOT ? 1
DIAMETER
T/C READOUT
T/C PROBE _^
ORSA
TE
H^O ** C>
LEAK CHECK
")-tr- HEADINGS
! ^
7, 1
^,^
r
^
?o
^
^477/ ^^__
^^-| -LIG
(Tf^u-i
<^^^^L!
' 0.^^
\~1 . *7*>6
PITOT
READING
IN. H2O
-^r
s ^
ORIFICE SETTIHa
IN. H2O
IDEAL
),7-7
2, -7^
5,6Cf
7"5 l^1 f'f
, r-^
,1 D
75^,
- , i,"^
,^3
, 6 /
7, y^
ICTl
/, ^2-
2 $~7
"JC.I1^
^>.
/ /^^r^
^
-^
^^i 7y
(^ a^<<7
j^q ^^20
i«4»^
V jL^^t
dri.irt
.3^
/
£_L
^V
,^ /v
,
-)
wT
,~o
/IS
A>-tXxi
^^^^^
/, ??
^,0^
T./w
^,^D
^,0°!
,^(
2,t/v
2c?
IX-COeX
ACTUAL
P'/
-^(JT-/
-2.^1
C?,5<^
iL> I
/, x^T-
-^ ^v
2. As/
7 ^T5!
2,f^
/. 6 2.
l^-z,
7,0^
^L/4
"? A"h
^,(7^
hi
Z^fr
"ZC?
Jtpi.
35^-n:
OAS
XETER
TEMP.
if1
+. -
^(^>
^C"
^r?
<3/5
/f 7^>
cp/v
^ /
^7^
^"?
1'
^7
^
! <^^ i
^"2. !
/v ^^
^S^~^
\ */
-jf7
^-.rtL
- ^---^"
7^
7 ^
/^r^i
<^
K \_
,
pi
Va
/IB
-------
R_ESU3L,O?S OF ONSITE MO I
Flint Name: COOL«UO
- i
Sampling Location! Ow-r FAN! "L
Date Received:
O&ta Analyzed:
ESI Reft
Reagent Box(ea)i
Run Number:
Run Date:
3 A
/ | \ /90
/ I i /90
/ /90
ANALYSIS OF MOISTURE CATCH
Reagent 1 ( Q. I
Final Weight, g.
Tared Weight, g.
Water Catch,g.
~M
Reagent 2 (
Final Weight, g.
Tared Weight, g.
Water Catch,g.
Reagent 3 (
Final Weight, g.
Tared Weight, g.
Water Catch,g.
CONDENSED WATER, g.
Silica Gel:
Final Weight, g.
Tared Weight, g.
Absorbed Water, g.
HI. Z
, i o
to ' o
TOTAL WATER COLLECTED, g.
42-0.0
(circle one)
>>
Triple beam)or Electronic
^ -
Balance f
NOTESi
-------
RESULTS OF ON SITE >1O X S T U f=U6C
Plant Name! ("OO..IA/O- TV-fc« - 1
Sampling Locationi OwTT
Date Received:
Date Analyzedi
BBI Reft
Reagent Box(ea)i
. K
Run Number:
Run Date:
CT./M. 2>C CT./-O
~) / \\ /90 ")/ »V /90
/ /90
ANALYSIS OP MOISTURE CATCH
Reagent 1 ( o \
Final Weight, g.
Tared Weight, g.
Water Catch,g.
"2^7 Z
4 1 1 - u
n
7 S'i D
/"57. Z.
Reagent 2 (
?inal Weight, g.
Tared Weight, g.
Water Catch, g.
Reagent 3 (
Final Weight, g.
Tared Weight, g.
Water Catch,g.
CONDENSED WATER, g.
Silica Gel:
Final Weight, g.
Tared Weight, g.
Absorbed Water, g.
^-c ^
/3->'-U
126] .O
TOTAL WATER COLLECTED, g.
37 b-
(circle one)
Triple beapi or Electronic
i,
Salance f
NOTES:
-------
XSOICINETXC
FIEX.D
COMPANY NAME ^ . /%L # ~2-
ADDRESS
SAMPLING LOCATION Ct><>L-^
RUN NUMBER J- \- &
TIME START / ^ i ^H , .
T^uxji.^ r^y/// #-~^ TIME
FINISH
~2.n \D-X
I DATE ~7 -^ -5 O TEAM LEADER M (.,& TECHNICIANS U/ X
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE. IN. HG
TRAIN LEAK CHECK VACUUM IN.
TRAIN LEAK RATE, CU.FT/MIN
EQUIPMENT CHECKS
^ PITOTS , PRETEST
(^"PITOTS , POSTTEST
M3 SAMPLING SYS /TED BAG
I/ THERMOCOUPLE @ {ti^ PRE
^-THERMOCOUPLE @ \Q (JPOST
FILTER I TARE
DELTA
METER
EST. *
C FACT
STACK
REF DI
K-FAC1
>^. CY STATIC PRESSURE IN. HoO 6^
HG 1^y PITOT "?'J^7 TEDLAR BAG
Ha '^£^'
TEMP /'cT("5
kH^O ^
COR ,176
TEMP ^r-"
:LTA p , S ^6
TOR ^.17^
'
FYRITE
cpfc£t
LEAK CHECK
READINGS
3
1
3
2
3
3
3
4
3
5
B
6
I!
CLOCK
SAMPL2I TIME
POINT MINUTES
DRT dA3 METER
READINGS
CUBIC FEET
PITOT
READI5C
IN. a-o
ORIFICE SETTUIG
IN. H2O
IDEAL ACTUAL
METEH
TEMP.
VACUUM
IN. HG
GAUGE
3AS TEMPERATURES
FILTER
BOX
IMPINGER
EXIT
'T
STACK
TEMP.
p
LKI
CHKI
1
2
I 3
A- ?
7
7
ITT
O(o
7
7
U
/ I CO-;
2.03-
7
10
Ul
12
c,
.5-7
as-
13
14
e
6 6 I .
l,o
1, oi
/Ol
15
, (90
16
1 II.
Ir.t
*!
-------
i-10
i- i 0
//b
40
n
IS OKI NET 1C
DATA
COMPANY NAME
ADDRESS I7
RUN NUMBER
SAMPLING LOCATION
DATE
TIME START
TIME FINISH
TEAM LEADER
t-L
TECHNICIANS
1,0 \1c~_
J
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE. IN. HG 2.^. <-/
TRAIN LEAK CHECK VACUUM IN. HG
TRAIN LEAK RATE, CU.FT/MIN
,
IN. H?0
EQUIPMENT CHECKS
t-* PITOTS * PRETEST
~ PITOTS, POSTTEST
M3 SAMPLING SYS/TED BAG
/ THERMOCOUPLE 9
^ THERMOCOUPLE @ /fr^POST
FILTER #
TARE
IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS
REAGENT BOX
METER BOX
UMBILICAL _
SAMPLE BOX
PROBE
T/C PROBE
ORSAT PUMP
PITOT "
TEDLAR BAG
LEAK CHECK
READINGS
DELTA H@
METER TEMP
EST. %H2O
C FACTOR
STACK TEMP
REF DELTA P
K-
FYRITE
Cp-i-1
DRY GA3 METER
READINGS
CUBIC FEET
D
11
12
13
14
IS
| 16
I
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
_^-- ~
<: I
23 '
,17
, i
PITOT
READING
IN. H?0
ORIFICE 3ETTIHO
IN. H20
IDEAL , ACTUAL
L
,7V
o
GAS
METER
TEMP.
F.
ob
D\
VACUUM
IN. HG
GAUGE
GAS TEHPERATITRES
FILTER
BOX
T
IMPINGER
EXIT
STACK
TEMP.
±
v-
6
31.
mlnuta*
Vm
C3-CTX-S
-------
E" I EHUD IIH.^'Z'
Plant Name
Sampling Location (Lg,
(A -&?
Start stop Comment a /Problems' A Run No
. 7 / /P is
A .
Sampling Team Initials _^U^_(Team Leader) \j(/\( _ _(Others)
Poatteat LaaJt Rate /^7£x*" Sample Appearance
Good Run (check)? v/_YES NO (if NO, explain in "Comments/Problems"
Start Stoo Comments/Problems* Run No.
TV
Sampling Team Initials /M^rT(Team Leader) l^/K! _ (Others
Posttest Leak Rate /P3^__ Sample Appearance
Good Run (check)? YES NO (if NO, explain ir. "Comments/Problems" )
Start Stop Comment a/Problems* VVpoff'* (-
-------
COMPANY NAMB <$ CT&. ^ 2-~
ADDRESS
SAMPLING LOCATION "P&M ^
Qfit)k "^ 3>^-^S~ RUN NUMBER 'Z- '
(4- / ^,5^
TIME START /-^ ^^.
Li_ * t TIME
FINISH
E.o3Qi
DATE £>^-QS S-£> TEAM LRADRR & RuaO TECHNICIANS ""] . ^P^*^^*-*-
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE. IN. HG
TRAIN LEAK CHECK VACUUM IN.
TRAIN LEAK RATE, CU.FT/MIN
EQUIPMENT CHECKS
^ PITOTS, PRETEST
S~ PITOTS, POSTTEST
A//A-M3 SAMPLING SYS/TED BAG
Z^ THERMOCOUPLE @ ^'S" PRE
^THERMOCOUPLE 6 ^
i_ POST
FILTER * TARE
DELTA
METER
X( ^ STATIC PRESSURE IN. H2O o
HG / ^5~ t **^
P.oll & oo*^
IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS
REAGENT BOX NOZZLE DIAMETEI
METER BOX Wtf - / Y ^S^^T/C READOUT
UMBILICAL /L. T/C PROBE ^| /4C=
STACK
REF D!
K-FAC1
TEMP ^j^"
:LTA p ^ .^.^
roR 2. ^fc^S
FYRITE
Cp*fi*
LEAK CHECK
READINGS
)
1
5
1
2
;
)
3
!
)
4
{
1
5
I
)
6
L
SAMPLE
POIHT
CLOCT
TIME
MINUTES
DRY GAS METER
READINGS
CUBIC FSBT
PITOT
READING
IN. H0
ORXPICB SETTIHG
IN. B20
IDEAL ACTUAL
GAS
METER
TEMP.
"f
VACUUM
IH. HO
GAUGE
GAS TEMPERATURES
BCK
7
EXIT
F
STACK
TEMP.
F
h
I-P
I.S5
\(
1,33
-SlS
G
S4D -
7-
ll//
"b
3i.
_LL
J^t=
B
IB.
lo
.33
1&.
PC
L/C.
_i^
71.2.1-
4-
A'fT"
P.IS
F1010
12/89
Pi
inuta*
ts
(LA-CTL- I
-------
Tlrr.t-'E
DATA SHEET
COMPANY NAMB
ADDRESS
£_ ' <£ f*! £
RUN NUMBER
LooO> j
5- £LiDC?
SAMPLING LOCATION J
DATS £, 3- o^ .^\ 6 TEAM LEADER
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE. IN. HG Z.^ . «-f
TRAIN LEAK CHECK VACUUM IN. HG
TRAIN LEAK RATE, CU.FT/MIN
TIME START
TIME FINISH
-r
TECHNICIANS
STATIC PRESSURE IN. H2O
EQUIPMENT CHECKS
_L/"PITOTS, PRETEST
_U/"PITOTS, POSTTEST
V//VM3 SAMPLING SYS/TED BAG
_i/_ THERMOCOUPLE @ ^5- PRE
<~/ THERMOCOUPLE 6^2- POST
FILTER *
TARE
IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS
REAGENT BOX
METER BOX
UMBILICAL
SAMPLE BOX
PROBE U-^
tf
PITOT
DIAMETER
T/C READOUT
T/C PROBE _g
ORSAT PUMP __
TEDLAR BAG
DELTA Hg
METER TEMP
EST. %H2O
C FACTOR
STACK TEMP
REF DELTA P
K-FACTOR
; OD
>. 3 2-2-
FYRITE
LEAK CHECK
. READINGS
SAMPLE
POINT
CLOCK
TIME
MIHUTBS
DKf OA3 METER
READINGS
CUBIC FKBT
PITOT
READING
IN. H0
QRI7ICB SETTIHG
IN. H2O
IDEAL ACTUAL
OA3
METER
TEMP.
'7
VACUUM
ID. HO
GAUGE
GAS TIXPKRATUKKS
FILTER
BOX
IKPIHGER
EXIT
'P
STACK
TEMP.
F
LX
CHK
1
kJU
1-0 '/
£> .
331!+
^L
2.
z-35"
D.
D , 2.1
/.
7_
-p. t5~
3
7-
(I
U-
z.so
2.-S2.
(Oi
Zi
&.41
r/2.
C
4
71010
12/89
Pi
mlnutaa
-------
' O .ix
IS
Plant Naoa,
Sampling Location! ooT -
Data R&ceived: Date Analytedt
BBI Reft
Reagent Eox(ea)i
Run Number:
Run Data:
1A Cn-w
/90
IB CTI-
/90
ANALYSIS O? MOISTURE CATCH
Reagent 1 (
Final Weight, g.
Tared Weight, g.
Water Catch,g.
266.0 /
Reagent 2 (
Final Weight, g.
Tared Weight, g.
Water Catch,g.
Seagent 3 {
Final Weight, g.
Tared Weight, g.
Water Catch,g.
COTO2NSED WATER, g.
Silica Gel:
Final Weight, g.
Tared Weight, g.
Absorbed Water, g.
I Z5O
TOTAL WATER COLLECTED, g.
(circle one)
Triple beapi or Electronic
^ -
Balance
NOTES 1 « Cn
/ (X7
-------
I S
Plant Name: Coon^o loto«cJ? ** ^L / BSI Ref*
Sampling Locationi O0"r _ -f^j,^ CS.LI* 3
Date Receivedi Date Analyredt Reagent Box(ea)t
Run Number: '^
Run Date: ~) / °\ /90 "7/^1 /90 / /90
ANALYSIS OP HOISTOTLS CATCH
Reagent 1 ( -\
Final Height, g.
Tared Weight, g.
n I.
Water Catch,g. ^ ' [
Reagent 2 (
Final Weight, g.
Tared Weight, g.
Water Catch,g.
Reagent 3 (
Final Weight, g.
Tared Weight, g.
Water Catch,g.
CONDENSED WATER, g. 302-1 (1 I "7
Silica Gels
Final Weight, g.
Tared Weight, g. / Z5O- °
joz -^ 57,.3
Absorbed Water, g.
TOTAL WATER COLLECTED, g,
(circle one)
^=S
Triple bea^ or Electronic
^ ] NOTES!
Balance *
-------
JL .f-tli
.£' -L.
COMPANY NAME ,^-rl ^2-- .
ADDRESS
«/[^ ^ 3Q.2-S" RUN NUMBER "2. - ^n
TIME START O^ ( £
SAMPLING LOCATION p4>i f.«i-<- & T TIMB
DATE 07-te.^.O TEAM LEADER A.^U^ TECHNICIANS 'T. C>£
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE. IN. HG
TRAIN LEAK CHECK VACUUM IN.
TRAIN LEAK RATE, CU.FT/MIN
EQUIPMENT CHECKS
I/ PITOTS, PRETEST
-XpITOTS, POSTTEST
jjfff M3 SAMPLING SYS/1
~\^ THERMOCOUPLE @ ?
i/" THERMOCOUPLE @ '
TOD BAG
_£_ PRE
fS~~POST
FILTER * TARE
DELTA
METER
EST. \
FINISH
O^s^ZO-
/*T-4(
LS 2_ STATIC PRESSURE IN. H-jO O
HG i&aSr
IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS
REAGENT BOX. NOZZLE DIAMETER <3.3?-O
METER BOX. U.J-1 * ( O"Z-^- T/C READOUT p 2.*>
UMBILICAL A- T/C PROBE (^- U\
SAMPLE BOX. /r ORSAT PUMP ^(^
PROBE //^ PITOT TEDLAR BAG U/.i4<
H? <0 ^5^7- P t-SS^ ^0^4^
TEMP 6^> AO ,/<£>} f) -H^
STACK
TEMP O 4 Ci g c>
REF DELTA P t) ^&° -O^^ D .(^3
K-FAC1]
COR t_ 16^=" r ,-?.?/ z.-'XYTr
t
FYRITE
CpDj^
LEAK CHECK
READINGS
B
1
{
B
2
;
B
3
R
3
4
R
B
5
R
B
6
j.
SAMPLE
POINT
CLOCK
TIME
MINUTES
DFCf OA3 METER
READINGS
CUBIC FEET
PITOT
READING
ORIPICE SETTIBG
IH. B2O
IDEAL ACTUAL
GAS
METER
TEMP.
'7
VACUUM
IN. HO
GAUGE
GAS TEMPERATURES
FILTER
BOX
7
IKPINGER
EXIT
'7
STAOC
TEMP.
'F
C <
Oa
t.rt
*//!-
Vr
r
e
el
3-
. IT-
6>
60
30/4.
£33.
&
2.9?
c>
e(
66
P.
/.2Z.8
4
_21
^S_
6-'
U
43
4
71010
12/89
Pi
/\H
t§
-------
I S OK. I NET I G
E'lLELD DATA
COMPANY NAME
ADDRESS
RUN NUMBER
- 4 &
SAMPLING LOCATION
DATS QT--./2. V* TEAM LEADER _
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE. IN. HG
TRAIN LEAK CHECK VACUUM IN. HG
TRAIN LEAK RATE, CU.FT/MIN
TIME START
TIME FINISH
TECHNICIANS I
STATIC PRESSURE IN. H2O O
EQUIPMENT CHECKS
i^. PITOTS, PRETEST
PITOTS, POSTTEST
/U/A/M3 SAMPLING SYS/TED BAG
*S THERMOCOUPLE @ ?-fe PRE
(/"THERMOCOUPLE @ <*£"_POST
FILTER f
TARE
IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS
REAGENT BOX
METER BOX tO T/C READOUT
T/C PROBE {
_ ORSAT PUMP _
TEDLAR BAG
DELTA Hg
METER TEMP
EST. %H20
C FACTOR
STACK TEMP
REF DELTA P
K-FACTOR
g.e»
FYRITE
LEAK CHECK
READINGS
SAMPLE
POINT
CLOCK
TIME
MINUTES
DKf GX3 METER
READINGS
CUBIC FEET
PITOT
READING
IN. H0
ORIFICE SETTINa
IN. H20
IDEAL ACTUAL
CAS
KETEH
TEMP.
p
VACUUM
IN. HO
GAUGE
WVBB3-
3TACX
TEMP.
LIC
CHK
Q, Sf ,/Og
£./
to
zA
2.. .
3 -
I&&
3.33
ex
/O .S3
V
ficfl -
P.
zz,
'LI
/>
V
P-V3
4
o.
Z-
D-
3
1/2,
',
J&L
<£>
F1010
12/89
Pi
mlnuta*
1 -err -8
-------
TEST LOG
Plant 'lame:
Sampling Location:
Date:
Initials:
' (Ar
7 - 16
urr
u
- ^
- 3 A-
r
F-0006
-------
IS OKIE NET 1C T"5TE»E FIELD DA.TA. SHEET
COMPANY
ADDRESS
NAME
<_ . 1 ( >v
< - frf 4A* 2_ BUN NUMBER ^1 " H " C -,.
*^r hf i ^ ^ !/x ^'vn
^ TIME
START 3 ,' / ^
SAMPLING LOCATION 6^ // # ^ ^o/o/rs* 4-t>^'jr- '.°itf3-\
RMOCOUPLE @ <<9 PRE SAMPLE BOX
t/ THERMOCOUPLE @ tfer POST PROBE
FILTER
# TARE DEI
ME1
ESI
-TA H^
"ER TEMP
%QO w
C FACTOR
/7-2-V PITOT 1^
^Q3 /
T/C
T/C
ORSA
;_ TE
'^n
DIAMETET
READOUT
PROBE <(
,r-r-7 ILEAK CHECK
H xc 1 READINGS
1 '£DJEZ_B| ^
^A H ^
' i J"? F
'.' J B C
T PUMP \ -,i !2
DLAR BAC
r
:no
STACK TEMP ^6
REF DELTA P
L
I
H
S
1
2
3
4
5
5
7
a
SAMPLE
POINT
CLOCK
TIME
MINUTES
,4 ! (7
-5. 1) /} y1-)
iv r
'ACTOR
/ C7
^
^.>// x 2-
^
7l^l^~\
. /i / y ; b ^
' ikj-JB ^7
b
r.^j
t
, P|
!c
*> 1
DRY GAS METER
READINGS
CUBIC FEET
^7 ^VP 6<:7-2-'
^2.^ x ^^7
"'*) iz,^ j/^ ~~i h i ^ ^r~
-''
-;--
T-|/i_i (2.7, ^^
,* 01 i /
(-. " ' M
-<= X7
# -'
/^^, c?9"
-\^ 0 ,^\
'??/!' 2 3 ^,I>T
-i. i ,-7 i/iy 'J.7h, I-/
9 "3
63'^ -z / y <7^7
10 j ~^ » ' I
^7!^|q-)^_; f^-
"L I/-, ^
-^ 12/1-
-M Wi_
-r ^i^
-£
o -'.
^
f^^^/H
_^6^<
/Wv
-"> I7) 2 '/V
-*"/
-*T
-6
pioi»3
VfH
c. 6 '/v-
^X^_
^2
5«,^
mlnutaa
52<~, / f1
. C'Y^cy-?
^^ D .^ /
A) S r\ >, "^ j
~*~7 S} £ -~J <-*
lU.^O
*v/ / 7 c /^^
Xx*" ^" "/ ^? / 1
in . #£
^i i ^^ ^ ^f
^f ^^7,1^^7
/.^/ ZSR
PITOT
READING
IN. H-,O
,^X
,/5 C7
/;
, ff 3, s^>
,2
,7^
,^5^
, |V-
/
~x s
f1-/
^7>
-? (9^1 2>"/
Is
II
"^
/
^
c,' i>)C-i ?f
I,7)1)
7/7(5
?,f , V
v.iri
^,37
.^6
l
-------
IS OK. I NET 1C
DATA SHEET
COMPANY NAME *? .' f -e, & 2
ADDRESS
SAMPLING LOCATION / « L
DATE 7 -" '' > "7 0 TEA*
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE.
TRAIN LEAK CHECK VAGI
TRAIN LEAK RATE, CU.I
EQUIPMENT CHECKS
-(/ PITOTS, PRETEST
I LEADE5
IN. HG
TOM IN.
'T/MIN
^ PITOTS, POSTTEST
6
HoO x^ O
IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS
REAGENT BOX
METER BOX ift/0 L^ '
UMBILICAL
SAMPLE BOX
NOZZLE DIAMETER .2-1y
^- ').)34. T/C READOUT
T/C PROBE
A^/V-
/?-i^y
ORSAT PUMP ^ /L -"
PROBE lA-T,--^ PITOT 3 ^ TEDLAR BAG ^/^
Hfl / i *1 ff
TEMP ^ (7
EST. %H,0 <-) £J
C FACTOR , ^?~7 ^
STACK
REF DI
K-FAC1
TEMP ft 0
:LTA p ,1,^(9
COR c, // /
FYRITE
Op J«t
LEAK CHECK
READINGS
3
3
2
3
B
4
B
5
B
6
!
1
i
\
_^2
OMffLB
POIHT
-'
-a
-j.n
CLOCK
TIME
MINUTES
0
DRT SA3 METER
READINGS
CUBIC FEET
33-
PITOT
READING
IN. H,O
-/o
ORTFICE SETTING
IN. H2O
IDEAL ACTUAL
c -/
-i
-7
-2
-4
2-
fe /%.
7
^
J3-
CAS
METEH
TEMP.
VACUUM
IN. HG
GAUGE
/,
y/;
r
r
,77
cl
b
\00
LQl_
GAS TEKPERATORES
FILTER
BOX
IMPINGER
EXIT
7
STACS
TEMP.
'7
LK!
CSK
r
-7?r
77
S"/
IP
u
/la
-------
TEST LOG
Plant Name:
Date:
Sampling Location:
Initials:
T
y
7
4I0Y7
r/<7-
£/ X I o
~ tAtl&fr -
>**>--&.
' U'.lO-l:
'^"7
-7V
^^r^-X
"IT,
~ 1
-------
RJESU3L.TS OF ON SITE i^OISTU^-BC
Plant Najae:
Sampling Locationi OoTT
Date Received*
SKI Refl 3
-------
.MO x
Plant Name: ^ooorifcr To>x>t£ - 1 BBI Reft
Sampling Locationi o^"" £^ *T
Data Received: Data Analyzed: Reagent Box(ea):
Run Number; CT1>'
Run Data: ~) / \ "L /90 7/ | Z /90 / /90
ANALYSIS OF MOISTURE CATCH
Reagent 1 ( 0. \ VI
Final Weight, g.
Tared Weight, g.
Water Catch,g. Sl3> 1 L1^" 0
Reagent 2 ( )
Final Weight, g.
Tared Weight, g.
Water Catch,g.
Reagent 3 (
Final Weight, g.
Tared Weight, g.
Water Catch, g.
CONDENSED WATER, g. "7,^ I
Silica Gel: i r Q*T C,
Final Weight, g. /TT6-7 C?OJ- I
Tared Weight, g. /25OO <2?QC> Q
65.
Absorbed Water, g.
TOTAL WATER COLLECTED, g. "] "2> 0<
(circle one)
Triple beam o)r Electronic
NOTES:
f "^*s.
Balance f
-------
RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE
Center for Environmental Measurements
August 28, 1990
Mr. Bill Kirk
CEM/ Engineering Division
Entropy Environmentalists, Inc.
P.O. Box 12291
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2291
Dear Bill ,
Enclosed are the ICAP results for the digested samples received on 8-14-
1990 for the project entitled, "Method Development and Testing for Industrial
Cooling Towers," EPA Contract No. 68D90055, RTI Project No. 4441-025.
Due to the insufficient supply of sample, no duplicate analyses and
replicate analyses of questionable samples were performed.
If you have any questions, please call me at 541-6569 or Peter Grohse at
541-6897.
Sincerely.
Kate K. Luk, Ph.D.
Ref: 4441-025
cc: W. Gutknecht
P. Grohse
J. Merricks
Post Office Box 12194 Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709-2194 Telephone 919 541-6000
FAX: 919541-5929
-------
RTI Project No : 4441-025
Samples : Digested Samples from Cooling Tower
Company : Entropy
Method of Analysis : ICAP
Sample received : 8-14-90
Report Date : 8-28-90
Sample
Table 1. Digested Sample Analysis Results, ug/mL
Al As B Ba Be Bi Ca
Cd
1
2
3
4
S
6
7
8
10
11
12
13
15
16
17
18
20
21
22
23
25
26
28
30
32
34
36
37
40
42
43
46
48
49
52
54
55
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.0310
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.0390
0.0320
ND
ND
ND
0.0400
0.0580
0.0770
0.0620
0.0950
0.225
0.149
ND
0.164
0.0310
0.0390
0.195
0.721
ND
0.204
0.0330
0.337
ND
0.0330
ND
0.108
0.117
0.112
0.0980
0.0510
0.0780
0.423
0.243
0.305
ND
1.38
1.64
1.41
1.72
0.361
2.05
1.71
1.66
0.364
1.96
1.93
1.78
0.285
1.74
2.06
1.61
0.377
0.955
0.198
0.561
0.991
0.724
2.51
0.634
0.227
2.25
0.197
0.243
2.21
0.693
0.163
2.07
0.364
ND
ND
ND
ND
22.3
22.6
21.7
22.6
4.49
44.8
ND
-
0.221
ND
ND
0.176
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
4.87
ND
ND
5.00
ND
ND
3.92
0.719
ND
3.78
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
50.0
50.6
49.5
49.4
9.33
106
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.0340
0.0130
0.0730
ND
0.0560
0.145
0.102
ND
0.0460
0.0720
0.0510
0.0210
0.0500
0.0630
0.0460
0.0150
0.0840
0.0300
0.0430
0.0410
0.0120
0.0120
0.0170
0.0420
0.0240
ND
0.0210
0.0190
0.0400
0.0220
0.0220
0.0300
ND
0.340
0.309
0.298
0.137
0.151
0.133
0.141
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.0220
ND
0.0400
0.0590
0.0460
0.0430
0.0160
0.0390
0.106
0.0340
0.0120
0.0440
0.0440
0.0400
0.0180
0.0320
0.0440
0.0340
0.0180
0.0310
ND
0.0190
0.0250
0.0180
0.246
0.0260
0.0150
0.263
0.0160
0.0130
0.253
0.071
0.0160
0.231
0.0220
0.229
0.238
0.213
0.230
2.53
2.45
2.41
2.38
0.532
5.23
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.240
ND
ND
0.230
0.00100
ND
0.224
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
2.31
2.36
2.26
2.28
0.481
4.53
ND
-
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.00200
0.02000
ND
0.105
0.132
0.160
0.131
0.046
0.138
0.155
0.145
0.0530
0.128
0.130
0.135
0.0440
0.132
0.122
0.131
0.0430
1.14
0.843
1.11
1.66
0.890
0.461
1.67
1.15
0.616
1.55
1.23
0.412
0.675
1.13
0.583
1.54
335
325
307
316
155
156
157
162
0.106
0.814
ND
0.00300
0.00800
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.0110
0.0120
0.00900
0.0150
0.00900
2.36
0.0210
0.00400
2.37
0.0340
0.0370
2.37
0.0100
0.0230
2.35
0.0100
ND
ND
ND
ND
23.6
24.1
23.4
24.0
4.88
47.1
Detection Limit 0.027
- : Insufficient Sample
0.14
0.16 0.012 0.012 0.0010
0.38 0.0010 0.0030
-------
RTI Project No : 4441-025
Samples : Digested Samples from Cooling Tower
Company : Entropy
Method of Analysis : ICAP
Sample received : 8-14-90
Report Date ; 8-28-90
Sample
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
10
11
12
13
15
16
17
18
20
21
22
23
25
26
28
30
32
34
36
37
40
42
43
46
48
49
52
54
55
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
Detection Limit 0.018
- : Insufficient Sample
CO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
2.46
ND
ND
2.48
ND
0.0430
2.37
0.504
ND
2.32
0.0540
ND
ND
ND
ND
23.0
23.9
23.6
23.5
4.67
46.9
Table 1. Digested Sample Analysis Results,
Cr Cu Fe K W Li
ND
0.00700
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.
ND
ND
.0140
.0190
.0130
.0160
.0100
.0280
.0210
.0190
.0080
.0210
.0240
.0150
00800
.0330
.0170
.0240
.0070
0.101
.0660
.0510
0.113
.0680
2.42
.0820
.0680
2.34
.0310
.0720
2.32
.0570
.0670
2.32
.0580
00700
ND
ND
ND
23.3
24.1
22.9
23.0
5.05
47.4
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.253
0.0770
0.0680
0.0840
0.184
2.38
0.204
0.0510
2.44
0.0480
0.0450
2.46
0.541
0.102
2.22
0.0390
0.0510
0.0420
ND
0.0490
22.9
23.1
21.6
22.9
5.17
49.2
0.198
0.218
0.0610
ND
0.152
0.224
0.215
0.255
0.120
0.341
0.264
0.268
0.298
0.280
0.459
0.276
0.106
0.498
0.299
0.312
0.103
1.01
0.624
1.23
2.12
1.01
2.95
1.21
0.645
2.66
0.677
0.605
2.69
3.60
0.752
2.68
0.928
ND
ND
ND
ND
24.1
24.9
23.3
23.4
5.19
50.0
0.
0.
0
0.
0.
0.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.
0
0
0.
0
ND
_
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0890
0920
.125
ND
0970
ND
0560
ND
ND
ND
0680
ND
ND
ND
ND
.102
.078
.133
ND
.755
.112
.109
.750
0680
ND
.678
.133
0820
.673
ND
2.63
2.64
2.59
2.73
9.28
9.13
8.71
8.80
1.46
16.0
ND
-
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.0110
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.0110
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.0110
0.0100
ND
ND
0.0330
0.0310
0.0320
0.0320
0.0160
0.0700
ND
-
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.0490
ND
0.0490
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.0870
0.0660
ND
0.0530
ND
ND
13.3
ND
ND
ug/mL
Mg
0.
0
0.
0.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.
0.
0
0210
.115
0600
0160
.139
.162
.241
.192
.106
.146
.193
.201
.216
.155
.187
.185
.128
.172
.130
.156
0910
0380
1.94
2.67
3.16
1.59
3.08
2.12
1.43
2.93
1.82
.960
2.54
1.46
2.18
3.36
1.24
108
114
110
115
75.7
77.3
77.2
77.8
4.79
46.4
Mn
ND
0.00500
0.00300
ND
0.00800
0.0100
0.0110
0.00900
0.00300
0.00900
0.0100
0.00800
0.00500
0.01000
0.0110
0.00800
0.00300
0.0110
0.00900
0.0130
0.00400
1.17
0.0350
0.0310
0.0540
0.179
2.43
0.125
0.177
2.39
0.493
0.0870
2.31
0.119
0.0940
2.38
0.0870
0.0140
0.0140
0.0130
0.0130
24.3
24.8
23.2
23.8
4.76
46.4
0.006 0.027 0.018 0.062 0.0093 0.049 0.0030 0.0010
-------
Project No : 4441-025'
Samples : Digested Samples from Cooling Tower
Company : Entropy
Method of Analysis : ICAP
Sample received : 8-14-90
Report Date : 8-28-90
Sample
Table 1. Digested Sample Analysis Results, ug/mL
Mo Na Ni p Pb Sb Se Si
Detection Limit 0.027
- : Insufficient Sample
0.026 0.012
0.31
0.12
0.43
0.19
0.12
Sn
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
10
11
12
13
15
16
17
18
20
21
22
23
25
26
28
30
32
34
36
37
40
42
43
46
48
49
52
54
55
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
ND
ND
0.0640
ND
0.159
0.184
0.204
0.200
ND
0.219
0.183
0.171
0.0560
0.191
0.192
0.171
0.0450
0.167
0.217
0.186
0.0610
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.0310
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.114
0.0950
0.09000
0.0790
ND
0.0480
0.0410
0.0430
ND
ND
ND
-
0.0460
ND
0.0680
0.0880
0.137
0.0960
0.0450
0.0650
0.141
0.107
0.0440
0.0940
0.112
0.0900
0.0290
0.0590
0.0540
0.0690
0.0270
0.82
0.771
0.510
0.808
0.625
0.528
1.15
0.789
0.750
0.572
0.363
0.336
0.294
0.468
0.458
0.206
21.4
22.0
20.8
21.9
12.9
13.4
12.7
13.3
0.491
5.41
ND
0.0620
ND
ND
ND
0.0120
ND
ND
ND
0.0140
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.0180
ND
ND
ND
0.0140
0.0240
ND
0.0410
0.0340
0.0320
0.0470
0.0610
2.75
0.0340
0.0210
2.44
ND
0.0190
2.37
0.0370
0.0390
2.29
0.0130
ND
ND
ND
ND
24.1
25.0
23.3
24.5
4.94
47.9
ND
_
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.410
0.317
ND
0.388
0.454
ND
0.606
0.552
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
2.43
ND
ND
2.49
0.125
ND
2.37
0.583
ND
2.39
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
23.7
23.8
23.6
23.8
4.82
48.2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.590
ND
_
ND
0.282
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.416
0.402
0.333
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.224
ND
ND
0.222
11.8
0.278
ND
11.4
ND
0.222
9.76
2.19
ND
9.78
ND
0.206
0.234
ND
ND
108
109
107
108
20.4
229
ND
_
27.0
ND
86.9
100
85.9
86.4
26.1
108
90.9
84.7
26.2
114
102
99.3
26.0
48.3
55.2
45.2
14.7
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.14
-------
RTI Project No : 4441-025
Samples : Digested Samples from Cooling Tower
Company : Entropy
Method of Analysis : ICAP
Sample received : 8-14-90
Report Date : 8-28-90
Table 1. Digested Sample Analysis Results, ug/mL
Sample Sr Ti Tl V Zn
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
10
11
12
13
15
16
17
18
20
21
22
23
25
26
28
30
32
34
36
37
40
42
43
46
48
49
52
54
55
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
ND
ND
0.00800
0.00100
0.0160
0.0180
0.0190
0.0190
0.00700
0.0200
0.0190
0.0160
0.00700
0.0200
0.0190
0.0190
0.00600
0.01600
0.01900
0.0160
0.00500
0.0410
0.0230
0.0340
0.0470
0.0350
0.0170
0.0360
0.0200
0.235
0.0250
0.0140
0.231
0.0680
0.0310
0.237
0.0150
1.81
1.98
1.88
1.96
3.25
. 3.32
3.18
3.21
0.514
5.05
ND
-
0.485
0.0190
0.0330
0.0910
0.0480
0.587
0.234
0.0610
0.0770
0.0720
0.0720
0.0280
0.0390
0.0710
0.0530
0.0670
0.125
0.0500
0.0420
0.0220
0.0120
0.0620
0.0690
0.0180
ND
0.0490
0.0220
ND
0.0210
0.0400
0.0170
0.0710
ND
ND
0.0240
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.0140
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.0140
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.085
ND
ND
0.0120
ND
0.00900
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.0350
0.212
0.0140
0.00800
0.0190
0.0370
0.0490
0.0230
0.0340
0.0260
0.0890
0.0270
0.0260
0.0250
0.0830
0.0240
0.0210
0.0410
0.0360
0.0300
0.0170
0.865
0.570
0.372
0.520
0.861
2.70
0.951
0.386
2.53
0.324
0.896
2.68
1.00
0.408
2.52
6.35
ND
ND
ND
ND
22.3
22.8
22.5
23.1
4.96
48.5
Detection Limit 0.001
- : Insufficient Sample
0.012
0.80 0.0090 0.0060
-------
RTI Project No : 4441-025
Samples : QC for Digested Samples from Cooling Tower
Company : Entropy
Method of Analysis : ICAP
Sample received : 8-14-90
Report Date : 8-28-90
Sample
QC
QC
QC
QC
QC
QC
QC Expected
Table 2. Calibration Check Sample, ug/mL
Ag Al As B Ba Be Bi
0.408
20.0
10.0
2.02
2.02
2.00
9.92
Ca
2.00
Cd
0.475
0.381
0.289
0.400
0.380
0.436
19.2
20.2
21.3
20.2
19.5
20.2
8.89
9.85
9.71
10.7
8.42
10.4
2.09
1.94
2.11
2.19
2.02
1.98
1.95
1.78
1.88
2.07
2.06
1.96
1.99
1.87
2.11
2.03
1.97
2.00
9.81
9.99
11.7
8.37
9.30
9.60
1.98
2.13
2.06
1.89
1.70
2.12
2.02
1.86
2.20
2.08
2.01
1.94
2.00
Sample
1000 ppm Al
1000 ppm Fe
Ag
Al
Interference Check, ug/mL
As B Ba Be
Bi
Ca
Cd
ND
ND
999
ND
0
.962
ND
1
ND
.01
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0
.00500
0.0150
Detection Limit 0.027
0.14
0.16 0.012 0.012 0.0010
0.38 0.0010 0.0030
-------
RTI Project No : 4441-025
Samples : QC for Digested Samples from Cooling Tower
Company : Entropy
Method of Analysis : ICAP
Sample received : 8-14-90
Report Date : 8-28-90
Sample
QC
QC
QC
QC
QC
QC
QC Expected
Table 2. Calibration Check Sample, ug/mL
Co Cr Cu Fe K W
2.00
2.00
Li
2.00
20.0
50.0
10.0
10.0
Mg
20.0
Mn
2.00
1.95
2.16
2.05
2.01
1.99
2.03
1.82
2.25
2.07
2.02
1.99
1.83
1.87
2.23
1.99
1.95
2.05
20.0
19.2
21.5
20.7
20.1
20.3
41.4
49.0
50.7
55.8
41.8
51.7
10.1
9.62
10.4
9.88
9.08
9.77
8.79
9.82
11.2
10.2
8.07
9.89
20.8
19.1
20.8
20.7
20.6
19.6
1.88
2.04
2.17
2.04
2.05
1.95
2.00
Interference Check, ug/mL
Sample
1000 ppm
1000 ppm
Al
Fe
Co
0.0560
ND
Cr
ND
0.0610
Cu
ND
ND
Fe
0.0310
1009
K
ND
ND
W
ND
ND
Li
ND
ND
Mg
0.00800
ND
Mn
0.00500
0.0330
Detection Limit
0.018
0.006 0.027
0.018
0.062 0.0093 0.049 0.0030 0.0010
-------
Project NO : 4441-025
Samples : QC for Digested Samples from Cooling Tower
Company : Entropy
Method of Analysis : ICAP
Sample received : 8-14-90
Report Date : 8-28-90
Sample
QC
QC
QC
QC
QC
QC
QC Expected
Table 2. Calibration Check Sample, ug/mL
Mo
2.00
Na
10.0
Ni
Pb
Sb
Se
10.0
16.4
10.2
4.00
10.0
Si
10.0
Sn
2.02
1.78
2.24
2.19
2.03
1.91
9.86
9.46
13.1
9.75
8.92
10.2
9.86
9.41
10.9
10.7
10.1
10.0
16.7
15.1
18.9
15.7
16.8
15.4
10.4
9.91
10.8
10.3
10.1
10.0
4.27
3.92
4.14
4.17
4.22
3.80
9.72
9.75
9.62
10.0
9.11
10.6
10.1
9.49
9.45
7.41
8.11
10.2
4.12
3.75
4.28
4.00
4.04
3.72
4.00
Sample
1000 ppm Al
1000 ppm Fe
Mo
Na
Interference Check, ug/mL
Ni P Pb Sb
Se
Si
Sn
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.557
0.369
0.414
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Detection Limit 0.027
0.026
0.012
0.31
0.12
0.43
0.19
0.12
0.14
-------
RTI Project No : 4441-025
Samples : QC for Digested Samples from Cooling Tower
Company : Entropy
Method of Analysis : ICAP
Sample received : 8-14-90
Report Date : 8-28-90
Table 2. Calibration Check Sample, ug/mL
Sample Sr Ti Tl V Zn
QC
QC
QC
QC
QC
QC
QC Expected
1.97
1.88
2.24
1.96
2.07
2.01
10.2
10.0
11.7
8.40
8.45
11.8
9.54
9.73
9.61
10.0
8.54
9.50
2.05
1.89
2.22
1.94
2.02
1.91
2.03
1.82
2.24
2.11
2.00
1.90
2.00
20.0
20.0
2.00
2.00
Sample
1000 ppm Al
1000 ppm Fe
Interference Check, ug/mL
Sr Ti Tl V Zn
ND ND ND ND 0.00600
ND ND ND ND 0.0710
Detection Limit 0.001 0.012
0.80 0.0090 0.0060
-------
I
Environmental Trace Substances Research Center
I Route 3
^M Columbia, Missouri 65203
UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI Telephone (314) 882-2151
September 10, 1990
Bill Kirk
Entropy
Post Office Box 12291
Research Triangle Park, N.C. 27709
Dear Dr. Kirk:
Enclosed are the ICP results for the 54 samples you sent and a
University invoice.
The samples took longer to analyze than projected because we
were not informed that there was HF in many of the samples.
Because of this, we ended up running many of the samples 2 or 3
times. I also did not report values for Si or B. Ag values may
also be suspect as indicated by spike recoveries.
If you send samples in the future, I would suggest removal of
the HF by addition of Perchloric acid and evaporation to fumes of
HC10 at least twice then the residue dissolved in acid and diluted
to volume.
Let me know if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Edward J. Hinderberger, Jr
Group Leader
EHrbm
Enclosure
COLUMBIA KANSAS CITY ROLLA ST. LOUIS
an eaual opportunity institution
-------
Quality Control Report
Environmental Trace Substances Research Center
ICP Scan - Blind QC Report
Project: ENTROPY Units: MCG/ML
Batch #: B-90080874
Customer ID: WP011 MINI
Description: EPA WATER-MINERALS
ETSRC ID: 0080934
Elm
AG
AL
AS
- BA
BE
BI
CA
CD
CO
CR
cu
FE
K
LI
MG
MN
MO
NA
NI
P
PB
SB
SE
SN
SR
TI
TL
V
ZN
Result
<0.01
0.04
<0.04
0.012
<0.001
<0.04
4.7
<0.003
<0.01
<0.01
<0.002
<0.005
1.3
0.002
1.3
<0.002
<0.005
38.7
<0.01
<0.09
<0.04
<0.04
<0. 05
<0.04
0. 0042
<0.002
<0.06
<0.004
<0.003
Expected Value +/- STD.DEV.
4.80
0.49
1.26
33.3
0.155
2.08
Estimated Sample
Detection Limit
0.01
0.02
0.04
0.0005
0.001
0.04
0.5
0.003
0.01
0.01
0.002
0.005
0.3
0.002
0.03
0.002
0.005
0.01
0.01
0.09
0.04
0.04
0.05
0.04
0.0005
0.002
0.06
0.004
0.003
-------
Quality Control Report
Environmental Trace Substances Research Center
ICP Scan - Duplicate Report
Project: ENTROPY Units: MCG/ML
Batch #: B-90080874
Customer ID: 6
Description: FAN 2 CTI/HI 1 A FILTER
ETSRC ID: 0080880
Elm
AG
AL
AS
BA
BE
BI
CA
CD
CO
CR
cu
FE
K
LI
MG
MN
MO
NA
NI
P
PB
SB
SE
SN
SR
TI
TL
V
ZN
Result
<0.05
2.1
<0.2
0.060
<0.003
<0.2
1.0
<0.01
<0.05
<0.05
0.03
0.23
<1.
<0.01
0.16
0.02
0.19
1.1
<0.06
<0.5
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
0.021
0.099
<0.2
<0.02
<0.01
Duplicate
<0.05
2.1
<0.2
0.061
<0.003
<0.2
1.1
<0.01
<0.05
<0.05
0.03
0.23
<1.
<0.01
0.16
0.02
0.19
1.1
<0.06
<0.5
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
0.022
0.099
<0.2
<0.02
<0.01
% Deviation
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.7
0.0
0.0
9.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Estimated Sample
Detection Limit
0.05
0.1
0.2
0.003
0.003
0.2
0.2
0.01
0.05
0.05
0.01
0.03
1.
0.01
0.002
0.01
0.03
0.07
0.06
0.5
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.002
0.01
0.2
0.02
0.01
Average % Deviation
0.5
-------
Quality Control Report
Environmental Trace Substances Research Center
ICP Scan - Duplicate Report
Project: ENTROPY Units: MCG/ML
Batch #: B-90080874
Customer ID: 16
Description: FAN 2 CTI/HI 3 A FILTER
ETSRC ID: 0080888
Elm
AG
AL
AS
BA
BE
BI
CA
CD
CO
CR
cu
FE
K
LI
MG
MN
MO
NA
NI
P
PB
SB
SE
SN
SR
TI
TL
V
ZN
Result
<0.05
2.6
<0.2
0.045
<0.002
<0.2
0.99
<0.01
<0.05
0.06
0.047
0.35
<1.
<0.01
0.16
<0.01
0.22
0.82
<0.05
<0.7
<0.2
<0.2
<0.3
<0.2
0.023
0.036
<0.2
<0.02
<0.01
Duplicate
<0.05
2.6
<0.2
0.044
<0.002
<0.2
0.97
<0.01
<0.05
0.17
0.034
0.85
<1.
<0.01
0.16
0.02
0.21
0.81
0.1
<0.7
<0.2
<0.2
<0.3
<0.2
0.023
0.034
<0.2
<0.02
<0.01
% Deviation
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.2
0.0
0.0
2.0
0.0
0.0
95.7
32.1
83.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
***
4.7
1.2
***
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
5.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
Estimated Sample
Detection Limit
0.05
0.1
0.2
0.002
0.002
0.2
0.2
0.01
0.05
0.05
0.01
0.03
1.
0.01
0.002
0.01
0.03
0.05
0.05
0.7
0.2
0.2
0
0
,3
.2
0.002
0.01
0.2
0.02
0.01
Average % Deviation
8.4
-------
Quality Control Report
Environmental Trace Substances Research Center
ICP Scan - Duplicate Report
Project: ENTROPY Units: MCG/ML
Batch #: B-90080874
Customer ID: 29
Description: FAN 1 CTI/LO 2 D NITRIC
ETSRC ID: 0080899
Elm
AG
AL
AS
BA
BE
BI
CA
CD
CO
CR
CU
FE
K
LI
MG
MN
MO
NA
NI
P
PB
SB
SE
SN
SR
TI
TL
V
ZN
Result
<0.01
0.68
<0.04
0.016
<0.001
<0.04
4.0
0.005
<0.01
0.044
0.066
0.590
<0.3
<0.002
1.2
0.022
<0.005
3.16
0.02
0.1
0.06
<0.04
<0.05
<0.04
0.024
0.014
<0.06
<0.004
0.360
Duplicate
<0.01
0.71
<0.04
0.016
<0.001
<0.04
4.1
0.005
<0.01
0.050
0.069
0.625
0.4
<0.002
1.3
0.023
<0.005
3.19
0.02
0.2
0. 06
<0.04
<0.05
<0.04
0.025
0.014
<0.06
<0.004
0.395
% Deviation
0.0
4.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.5
0.0
0.0
12.8
4.4
5.8
***
0.0
8.0
4.4
0.0
0.9
0.0
66.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
9.3
Estimated Sample
Detection Limit
0.01
0.02
0.04
0.0005
0.001
0.04
0.5
0.003
0.01
0.01
0.002
0.005
0.3
0.002
0.03
0.002
0.005
0.01
0.01
0.09
0.04
0.04
0.05
0.04
0.0005
0.002
0.06
0.004
0.003
Average % Deviation
4.4
-------
Quality Control Report
Environmental Trace Substances Research Center
ICP Scan - Duplicate Report
Project: ENTROPY Units: MCG/ML
Batch #: B-90080874
Customer ID: 39
Description: FAN 3 CTI/HI 1 C NITRIC
ETSRC ID: 0080904
Elm
AG
AL
AS
BA
BE
BI
CA
CD
CO
CR
CU
FE
K
LI
MG
MN
MO
NA
NI
P
PB
SB
SE
SN
SR
TI
TL
V
ZN
Result
0.076
3.10
5.26
0.274
0.261
<0.04
3.9
2.71
2.50
2.59
2.69
3.31
15.
<0.002
3.77
2.56
<0.005
6.70
2.70
<0.1
2.6
<0.04
12.9
<0.04
0.297
0.016
<0.06
<0.004
3.24
Duplicate
0.27
3.10
5.22
0.274
0.260
<0.04
3.8
2.70
2.48
2.58
2.68
3.30
15.
<0.002
3.73
2.56
<0.005
6.72
2.69
<0.1
2.6
<0.04
12.8
<0.04
0.296
0.017
<0.06
<0.004
3.22
% Deviation
112.1
0.0
0.8
0.0
0.4
0.0
2.6
0.4
0.8
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.0
0.0
1.1
0.0
0.0
0.3
0.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.8
0.0
0.3
6.1
0.0
0.0
0.6
Estimated Sample
Detection Limit
0.01
0.02
0.04
0.0005
0.001
0.04
0.5
0.004
0.01
0.01
0.002
0.005
0.3
0.002
0.03
0.002
0.005
0.01
0.01
0.1
0.04
0.04
0.05
0.04
0.0005
0.002
0.06
0.004
0.004
Average % Deviation
4.4
-------
Quality Control Report
Environmental Trace Substances Research Center
ICP Scan - Spike Report
project: ENTROPY Units: MCG/ML
Batch #: B-90080874
Customer ID: 13
Description: FAN 1 CTI/HI 2 C FILTER
ETSRC ID: 0080885
Elm
AG
AL
AS
BA
BE
BI
CA
CD
CO
CR
CU
FE
K
LI
MG
MN
MO
NA
NI
P
PB
SB
SE
SN
SR
TI
TL
V
ZN
Result
<0.05
2.0
<0.2
0.041
<0.003
<0.2
1.3
<0.01
<0.05
<0.05
0.01
0.23
<1.
<0.01
0.20
0.02
0.17
1.3
<0.06
<0.5
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
<0.2
0.020
0.069
<0.2
<0.02
0.02
MCG Added
2.0
500.0
5.0
1.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
2.0
0.0
10.0
20.0
500.0
0.0
0.0
100.0
100.0
10.0
0.0
5.0
0.0
5.0
0.0
5.0
0.0
2.0
0.0
10.0
5.0
100.0
Spiked Sample
2.9
500.
4.6
1.06
0.981
<0.2
1.9
1.97
<0.05
10.1
19.8
528.
<1.
<0.01
95.6
96.3
10.3
1.1
5.1
<0.9
4.6
<0.2
4.8
<0.2
2.15
0.076
9.6
4.99
98.8
% Recovery
145.
100.
92.
102.
98.
-
99.
101.
99.
106.
_
95.
96.
101.
-
102.
-
92.
-
96.
-
106.
-
96.
100.
99.
Estimated Sample
Detection Limit
0.05
0.1
0.3
0.003
0.003
0.2
0.2
0.01
0.05
0.05
0.01
0.04
1.
0.01
0.003
0.01
0.04
0.07
0.06
0.7
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.2
0.003
0.01
0.2
0.02
0.02
Average % Recovery
- Not Spiked
* Possibly Not Spiked - Not in Average
*** Spike Too Low
101,
-------
Quality Control Report
Environmental Trace Substances Research Center
ICP Scan - Spike Report
Project: ENTROPY Units: MCG/ML
Batch #: B-90080874
Customer ID: 20
Description: FAN 3 PM10 3 E LEAD FILTER
ETSRC ID: 0080891
Elm
AG
AL
AS
BA
BE
BI
CA
CD
CO
CR
cu
FE
K
LI
MG
MN
MO
NA
NI
P
PB
SB
SE
SN
SR
TI
TL
V
ZN
Result
<0.05
1.4
<0.2
0.024
<0.002
<0.2
3.5
<0.01
<0.05
0.52
0.038
2.3
<1.
<0.01
0.311
0.094
0.04
0.96
1.2
<0.7
<0.2
<0.2
<0.3
<0.2
0.0082
0.057
<0.2
<0.02
0.15
MCG Added
4.0
20.0
10.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
2.0
0.0
10.0
20.0
200.0
0.0
0.0
100.0
10.0
10.0
0.0
10.0
0.0
10.0
0.0
10.0
0.0
2.0
0.0
10.0
2.0
40.0
Spiked Sample
4.3
22.3
9.8
2.09
0.944
<0.2
4.9
2.11
<0.05
10.9
20.2
217.
<1.
<0.01
99.0
10.2
10.3
1.2
11.6
<1.
10.
<0.2
9.8
<0.2
2.20
0.065
9.9
2.06
39.9
% Recovery
108.
105.
98.
103.
94.
-
105.
104.
101.
107.
_
99.
101.
103.
_
104.
_
100.
-
98.
_
110-
99.
103.
99.
Estimated Samplo
Detection Limit
0.05
0.1
0.2
0.003
0.003
0.2
0.2
0.01
0.05
0.05
0.01
0.03
1.
0.01
0.003
0.01
0.03
0.05
0.05
0.9
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.2
0.003
0.01
0.2
0.02
0.02
Average % Recovery
- Not Spiked
* Possibly Not Spiked - Not in Average
*** Spike Too Low
102.
-------
Quality Control Report
Environmental Trace Substances Research Center
ICP Scan - Spike Report
Project: ENTROPY Units: MCG/ML
Batch #: B-90080874
Customer ID: 34
Description: FAN 2 CTI/HI 1 A NITRIC
ETSRC ID: 0080902
Elm
AG
AL
AS
BA
BE
BI
CA
CD
CO
CR
CU
FE
K
LI
MG
MN
MO
NA
NI
P
PB
SB
SE
SN
SR
TI
TL
V
ZN
Result
0.02
2.39
<0.04
0.021
<0.001
<0.04
6.0
0.009
<0.01
0.28
0.201
1.58
2.7
0.003
1.7
0.19
<0.005
6.49
0.32
0.40
0-04
<0.04
<0.05
<0.04
0.038
0.026
<0.06
<0.004
0.941
MCG Added
0.7
3.3
1.7
0.3
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.3
0.0
1.7
3.3
33.3
0.0
0.0
16.7
1.7
1.7
0.0
1.7
0.0
1.7
0.0
1.7
0.0
0.3
0.0
1.7
0.3
6.7
Spiked Sample
0.80
6.74
2.0
0.397
0.189
<0.04
8.3
0.438
0.01
2.24
3.89
40.9
2.9
0.003
21.0
2.08
1.94
6.37
2.34
<0.2
2.0
<0.04
1.9
<0.04
0.442
0.027
1.9
0.39
9.07
% Recovery
117.
131.
120.
114.
111.
-
130.
-
117.
111.
118.
-
-
116.
113.
116.
-
121.
-
117.
-
114.
-
122.
-
114.
118.
122.
Average % Recovery
- Not Spiked
* Possibly Not Spiked - Not in Average
*** Spike Too Low
118
-------
Quality Control Report
Environmental Trace Substances Research Center
ICP Scan - Spike Report
Project: ENTROPY Units: MCG/ML
Batch #: B-90080874
Customer ID: 43
Description: FAN 1 CTI/HI 2 C NITRIC
ETSRC ID: 0080906
Elm
AG
AL
AS
BA
BE
BI
CA
CD
CO
CR
CU
FE
K
LI
MG
MN
MO
NA
NI
P
PB
SB
SE
SN
SR
TI
TL
V
ZN
Result
<0.01
1.6
<0.04
0.019
0.001
<0.04
7.5
0.033
<0.01
0.039
0.084
0.836
3.3
0.004
2.2
0.588
<0.005
4.48
0.03
0.33
<0.04
<0.04
<0.05
<0.04
0.032
0.023
<0.06
<0.004
0.427
MCG Added
0.7
3.3
1.7
0.3
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.3
0.0
1.7
3.3
33.3
0.0
0.0
16.7
1.7
1.7
0.0
1.7
0.0
1.7
0.0
1.7
0.0
0.3
0.0
1.7
0.3
6.7
Spiked Sample
0.75
5.25
1.9
0.374
0.181
<0.04
7.3
0.440
<0.01
1.88
3.55
37.8
2.9
0.004
20.3
2.36
1.83
4.34
1.95
<0.1
1.9
<0.04
1.8
<0.04
0.410
0.023
1.8
0.37
8.15
% Recovery
112.
110.
114.
108.
106.
-
-
123.
-
110.
104.
111.
-
109.
106.
110.
115.
114.
-
108.
-
115.
108.
112.
116.
Estimated Sample
Detection Limit
0.01
0.02
0.04
0.0005
0.001
0.04
0.5
0.003
0.01
0.01
0.002
0.005
0.3
0.002
0.03
0.002
0.006
0.01
0.01
0.1
0.04
0.04
0.05
0.04
0.0005
0.002
0.06
0.004
0.003
Average % Recovery
- Not Spiked
* Possibly Not Spiked - Not in Average
*** Spike Too Low
111,
-------
Quality Control Report
Environmental Trace Substances Research Center
ICP Scan - Duplicate Report
Project: ENTROPY Units: MCG/ML
Batch #: B-90080874
Customer ID: 64
Description: WATER FILTER RUN 4
ETSRC ID: 0080922
Elm
AG
AL
AS
BA
BE
BI
CA
CD
CO
CR
CU
FE
K
LI
MG
MN
MO
NA
NI
P
PB
SB
SE
SN
SR
TI
TL
V
ZN
Result
<0.05
0.81
<0.2
0.029
<0.002
<0.2
7.6
<0.01
<0.05
0.05
0.050
0.66
<1.
<0.01
1.37
0.01
0.05
3.1
<0.05
<0.7
<0.2
<0.2
<0.3
<0.2
0.044
0.044
<0.2
<0.02
0.16
Duplicate
<0.05
0.83
<0.2
0.029
<0.002
<0.2
7.6
<0.01
<0.05
<0.05
0.050
0. 65
<1.
<0.01
1.37
0.02
0.05
3.1
0.06
<0.7
<0.2
<0.2
<0.3
<0.2
0.044
0.044
<0.2
<0.02
0.16
% Deviation
0.0
2.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
***
0.0
1.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
66.7
0.0
0.0
***
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Estimated Sample
Detection Limit
0.05
0,
0,
1
2
0.002
0.002
0.2
2.
0.01
0.05
0.05
0.01
0.03
1.
0.01
0.002
0.01
0.03
0.05
0.05
7
,2
,2
,3
0,
0,
0
0
0.2
0.002
0.01
0.2
0.02
0.01
Average % Deviation
2.6
-------
Quality Control Report
Environmental Trace Substances Research Center
ICP Scan - Spike Report
Project: ENTROPY Units: MCG/ML
Batch #: B-90080874
Customer ID: 70
Description: WATER RUN 2
ETSRC ID: 0080928
Elm
AG
AL
AS
BA
BE
BI
CA
CD
CO
CR
cu
FE
K
LI
MG
MN
MO
NA
NI
P
PB
SB
SE
SN
SR
TI
TL
V
ZN
Result
0.1
25.9
50.5
2.68
2.56
<0.2
181.
26.0
24.7
24.9
25.2
26.7
148.
0.02
77.9
24.9
0.04
127.
25.7
<1.
25.1
<0.2
125.
<0.2
3.70
0.03
<0.2
<0.02
25.3
MCG Added
2.0
500.0
5.0
1.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
2.0
0.0
10.0
20.0
500.0
0.0
0.0
100.0
100.0
10.0
0.0
5.0
0.0
5.0
0.0
5.0
0.0
2.0
0.0
10.0
5.0
100.0
Spiked Sample
2.5
520.
57.5
3.79
3.78
<0.2
191.
29.3
25.7
35.5
45.8
528.
155.
0.03
174.
119.
9.61
133.
31.5
<1.
30.9
<0.2
137.
<0.2
5.98
0.037
8.9
4.73
124.
% Recovery
120.
99.
***
***
***
-
-
***
-
***
103.
100.
-
-
96.
94.
96.
-
***
-
***
-
***
-
114.
-
89.
95.
99.
Estimated Sample
Detection Limit
0.05
0.1
0.3
0.003
0.003
0.2
2.
0.02
0.05
0.05
0.01
0.04
1.
0.01
0.08
0.01
0.04
0.05
0.05
1.
0.2
0.2
0.4
0.2
0.003
0.01
0.2
0.02
0.03
Average % Recovery
- Not Spiked
* Possibly Not Spiked - Not in Average
*** Spike Too Low
100.
-------
Quality Control Report
Environmental Trace Substances Research Center
ICP Scan - Blind QC Report
Project: ENTROPY Units: MCG/ML
Batch #: B-90080874
Customer ID: ERA9924TM
Description: WATER - TRACE METALS
ETSRC ID: 0080933
Elm
AG
AL
AS
BA
BE
BI
CA
CD
CO
CR
CU
FE
K
LI
MG
MN
MO
NA
NI
P
PB
SB
SE
SN
SR
TI
TL
V
ZN
Result
0.042
0.44
0.07
0.216
0.057
<0.04
<0.03
0.11
0.13
0.24
0.16
0.20
0.4
<0.002
0.0019
0.18
0.12
0.081
0.37
<0.09
0.12
0.13
0.09
<0.04
0.0006
0.12
<0.06
0.12
0.15
Expected Value
0.160
0.366
0.059
0.196
0.050
0.0874
0.120
0.226
0.133
0.171
0.160
0.104
0.312
0.107
0.124
0.0627
0.117
0.0294
0.106
0.126
+/- STD.DEV.
0.040
0.092
0.015
0.049
0.012
0.022
0.030
0.057
0.033
0.043
0.040
0.026
0.078
0.027
0.031
0.016
0.029
0.0075
0.026
0.032
Estimated Sample
Detection Limit
0.01
0.02
0.04
0.0005
0.001
0.04
0.03
0.003
0.01
0.01
0.002
0.005
0.3
0.002
0.0005
0.002
0.005
0.01
0.01
0.09
0.04
0.04
0.05
0.04
0.0005
0.002
0.06
0.004
0.003
-------
Environmental Trace Substances Research Center
ICP Scan - Sample Analysis Report
Project: ENTROPY Units: MCG/ML
Batch #: B-90080874
Customer ID: 1
Description: H20 BLANK
ETSRC ID: 0080875
Estimated Sample
Result Detection Limit
<0.01 0.01
0.06 0.02
<0.04 0.04
0.0037 0.0005
<0.0006 0.0006
<0.04 0.04
Elm
AG
AL
AS
BA
BE
BI
CA
CD
CO
CR
cu
FE
K
LI
MG
MN
MO
NA
NI
P
PB
SB
SE
SN
SR
TI
TL
V
ZN
0.25 0.03
<0.002 0.002
<0.01 0.01
<0.01 0.01
<0.002 0.002
0.024 0.005
1.8 0.3
0.003 0.002
0.019 0.0005
<0.002 0.002
<0.005 0.005
0.17 0.01
<0.01 0.01
<0.1 0.1
<0.04 0.04
<0.04 0.04
<0.04 0.04
<0.04 0.04
0.001 0.0005
<0.002 0.002
<0.05 0.05
<0.003 0.003
0.045 0.002
-------
Environmental Trace Substances Research Center
ICP Scan - Sample Analysis Report
Project: ENTROPY Units: MCG/ML
Batch #: B-90080874
Customer ID: 2
Description: NITRIC ACID BLANK
ETSRC ID: 0080876
Estimated Sample
Detection Limit
0.01
0.02
0.04
0.0005
0.0006
0.04
0.4
0.002
0.01
0.01
0.002
0.005
0.3
0.002
0.0005
0.002
0.005
0.01
0.01
0.1
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.0005
0.002
0.05
0.003
0.002
Elm
AG
AL
AS
BA
BE
BI
CA
CD
CO
CR
cu
FE
K
LI
MG
MN
MO
NA
NI
P
PB
SB
SE
SN
SR
TI
TL
V
ZN
Result
<0.01
0.41
<0.04
0.0045
<0.0006
<0.04
1.5
<0.002
<0.01
<0.01
0.0086
0.16
1.6
0.002
0-123
0.005
<0.005
0.48
0.068
<0 . 1
<0.04
<0.04
<0.04
<0. 04
0.0024
0.005
<0.05
<0.003
0.246
-------
Environmental Trace Substances Research Center
ICP Scan - Sample Analysis Report
Project: ENTROPY Units: MCG/ML
Batch #: B-90080874
Customer ID: 3
Description: FILTER BLANK (94)
ETSRC ID: 0080877
Estimated Sample
Detection Limit
0.01
0.02
0.04
0.0005
0.0006
0.04
0.03
0.002
0.01
0.01
0.002
0.006
0.3
0.002
0.0005
0.002
0.005
0.01
0.01
0.1
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.0005
0.002
0.05
0.003
0.002
Elm
AG
AL
AS
BA
BE
BI
CA
CD
CO
CR
CU
FE
tr
LI
MG
MN
MO
NA
NI
p
PB
SB
SE
SN
SR
TI
TL
V
ZN
Re
<0
0.
<0
0.
<0
<0
0.
<0
<0
<0
<0
0.
<0
<0
0.
0.
0.
0.
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
0.
0.
<0
<0
0.
suit
.01
77
.04
021
.0006
.04
31
.002
.01
.01
.002
092
.3
.002
0599
003
055
40
.01
.1
.04
.04
.04
.04
0079
437
.05
.003
015
-------
Environmental Trace Substances Research Center
ICP Scan - Sample Analysis Report
Project: ENTROPY Units: MCG/ML
Batch #: B-90080874
Customer ID: 4
Description: FILTER BLANK (93)
ETSRC ID: 0080878
Estimated Sample
Elm
AG
AL
AS
BA
BE
BI
CA
CD
CO
CR
cu
FE
K
LI
MG
MN
MO
NA
NI
P
PB
SB
SE
SN
SR
TI
TL
V
ZN
Result Detection Limit
<0.01 0.01
<0.02 0.02
<0.04 0.04
0.0007 0.0005
<0.0006 0.0006
<0.04 0.04
0.06 0.03
<0.002 0.002
<0.01 0.01
<0.01 0.01
<0.002 0.002
0.016 0.005
0.4 0.3
<0.002 0.002
0.012 0.0005
<0.002 0.002
<0.005 0.005
0.10 0.01
<0.01 0.01
<0.1 0.1
<0.04 0.04
<0.04 0.04
<0.04 0.04
<0.04 0.04
0.001 0.0005
0.056 0.002
<0.05 0.05
<0.003 0.003
0.0082 0.002
-------
Environmental Trace Substances Research Center
ICP Scan - Sample Analysis Report
Project: ENTROPY Units: MCG/ML
Batch #: B-90080874
Customer ID: 5
Description: FILTER BLANK (96)
ETSRC ID: 0080879
Estimated Sample
Detection Limit
0.01
0.02
0.04
0.0005
0.0006
0.04
0.03
0.002
0.01
0.01
0.002
0.007
0.3
0.002
0.0005
0.002
0.005
0.01
0.01
0.1
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.0005
0.002
0.05
0.003
0.003
Elm
AG
AL
AS
BA
BE
BI
CA
CD
CO
CR
CU
FE
K
LI
MG
MN
MO
NA
NI
P
PB
SB
SE
SN
SR
TI
TL
V
ZN
Result
<0.01
1.8
0.04
0.038
<0.0006
<0.04
0.80
0.002
<0.01
0.02
0.0098
0.17
<0.3
<0.002
0. 141
0.0077
0.17
0.61
0.01
<0.1
<0.04
<0.04
<0.04
<0.04
0.018
0.038
<0.05
<0.003
<0.003
-------
Environmental Trace Substances Research Center
ICP Scan - Sample Analysis Report
project: ENTROPY Units: MCG/ML
Batch #: B-90080874
Customer ID: 6
Description: FAN 2 CTI/HI 1 A FILTER
ETSRC ID: 0080880
Estimated Sample
Elm
AG
AL
AS
BA
BE
BI
CA
CD
CO
CR
CU
FE
K
LI
MG
MN
MO
NA
NI
P
PB
SB
SE
SN
SR
TI
TL
V
ZN
Result Detection Limit
<0.05 0.05
2.1 0.1
<0.2 0.2
0. 060 0.003
<0.003 0.003
<0.2 0.2
1.0 0.2
<0.01 0.01
<0.05 0.05
<0.05 0.05
0.03 0.01
0.23 0.03
<1. 1.
<0.01 0.01
0.16 0.002
0.02 0.01
0.19 0.03
1.1 0.07
<0.06 0.06
<0-5 0.5
<0.2 0.2
<0.2 0.2
<0.2 0.2
<0.2 0.2
0.021 0.002
0.099 0.01
<0.2 0.2
<0.02 0.02
<0.01 0.01
-------
Environmental Trace Substances Research Center
ICP Scan - Sample Analysis Report
Project: ENTROPY Units: MCG/ML
Batch #: B-90080874
Customer ID: 8
Description: FAN 3 CTI/HI 1 C FILTER
ETSRC ID: 0080881
Estimated Sample
Result Detection Limit
<0.05 0.05
1.9 0.1
<0.2 0.2
0.038 0.003
<0.003 0.003
Elm
AG
AL
AS
BA
BE
BI
CA
CD
CO
CR
CU
FE
K
LI
MG
MN
MO
NA
NI
P
PB
SB
SE
SN
SR
TI
TL
V
ZN
<0.2 0.2
0.97 0.2
<0.01 0.01
<0.05 0.05
0.05 0.05
<0.01 0.01
0.18 0.03
<1. 1.
<0.01 0.01
0.18 0.002
0.02 0.01
0.17 0.03
0.98 0.07
<0.06 0.06
<0.5 0.5
<0.2 0.2
<0.2 0.2
<0.2 0.2
<0.2 0.2
0.021 0.002
0.54 0.01
<0.2 0.2
<0.02 0.02
0.02 0.01
-------
Environmental Trace Substances Research Center
ICP Scan - Sample Analysis Report
Project: ENTROPY Units: MCG/ML
Batch #: B-90080874
Customer ID: 9
Description: FAN 3 CTI/LO 1 B FILTER
ETSRC ID: 0080882
Estimated Sample
Elm Result Detection Limit
AG <0.05 0.05
AL 2.2 0.1
AS <0.2 0.2
BA 0.060 0.003
BE <0.003 0.003
BI <0.2 0.2
CA 1.0 0.2
CD <0.01 0.01
CO <0.05 0.05
CR <0.05 0.05
CU <0.01 0.01
FE 0.22 0.03
K <1. 1.
LI <0.01 0.01
MG 0.18 0.002
MN 0.02 0.01
MO 0.20 0.03
NA 1.2 0.07
NI <0.06 0.06
P <0.5 0.5
PB <0.2 0.2
SB <0.2 0.2
SE <0.2 0.2
SN <0.2 0.2
SR 0.020 0.002
TI 0.048 0.01
TL <0.2 0.2
V <0.02 0.02
ZN 0.056 0.01
-------
Environmental Trace Substances Research Center
ICP Scan - Sample Analysis Report
Project: ENTROPY Units: MCG/ML
Batch #: B-90080874
Customer ID: 10
Description: FAN 2 PM10 1 E LEAD FILTER
ETSRC ID: 0080883
Estimated Sample
Result Detection Limit
<0.01 0.01
0.64 0.02
<0.04 0.04
0.020 0.0005
<0.0006 0.0006
<0.04 0.04
Elm
AG
AL
AS
BA
BE
BI
CA
CD
CO
CR
cu
FE
K
LI
MG
MN
MO
NA
NI
P
PB
SB
SE
SN
SR
TI
TL
V
ZN
0.57 0.03
0.003 0.002
<0.01 0.01
<0.01 0.01
0.012 0.002
0.12 0.006
<0.3 0.3
<0.002 0.002
0.145 0.0005
0.0066 0.002
0.055 0.005
0.62 0.01
<0.01 0.01
<0.1 0.1
<0.04 0.04
<0.04 0.04
<0.04 0.04
<0.04 0.04
0.0077 0.0005
0.228 0.002
<0.05 0.05
<0.003 0.003
0.070 0.002
-------
Environmental Trace Substances Research Center
ICP Scan - Sample Analysis Report
Project: ENTROPY Units: MCG/ML
Batch #: B-90080874
Customer ID: 11
Description: FAN 2 CTI/HI 2 A FILTER
ETSRC ID: 0080884
Estimated Sample
Elm
AG
AL
AS
BA
BE
BI
CA
CD
CO
CR
cu
FE
K
LI
MG
MN
MO
NA
NI
P
PB
SB
SE
SN
SR
TI
TL
V
ZN
Result Detection Limit
<0.05 0.05
2.4 0.1
<0.2 0.2
0.045 0.003
<0.003 0.003
<0.2 0.2
0.96 0.2
<0.01 0.01
<0.05 0.05
<0.05 0.05
<0.01 0.01
0.24 0.03
<1. 1.
<0.01 0.01
0.13 0.002
0.02 0.01
0.21 0.03
0.76 0.07
<0.06 0.06
<0.5 0.5
<0.2 0.2
<0.2 0.2
<0.2 0.2
<0.2 0.2
0.025 0.002
0.065 0.01
<0.2 0.2
<0.02 0.02
<0.01 0.01
-------
Environmental Trace Substances Research Center
ICP Scan - Sample Analysis Report
Project: ENTROPY Units: MCG/ML
Batch #: B-90080874
Customer ID: 13
Description: FAN 1 CTI/HI 2 C FILTER
ETSRC ID: 0080885
Estimated Sample
Elm
AG
AL
AS
BA
BE
BI
CA
CD
CO
CR
cu
FE
K
LI
MG
MN
MO
NA
NI
P
PB
SB
SE
SN
SR
TI
TL
V
ZN
Result Detection Limit
<0.05 0.05
2.0 0.1
<0.2 0.2
0.041 0.003
<0.003 0.003
<0.2 0.2
1.3 0.2
<0.01 0.01
<0.05 0.05
<0.05 0.05
0.01 0.01
0.23 0.03
<1. 1.
<0.01 0.01
0.20 0.002
0.02 0.01
0.17 0.03
1.3 0.07
<0.06 0.06
<0.5 0.5
<0.2 0.2
<0.2 0.2
<0.2 0.2
<0.2 0.2
0.020 0.002
0.069 0.01
<0.2 0.2
<0.02 0.02
0.02 0.01
-------
Environmental Trace Substances Research Center
TCP Scan - Sample Analysis Report
Project: ENTROPY Units: MCG/ML
Batch #: B-90080874
Customer ID: 14
Description: FAN 1 CTI/LO 2 D FILTER
ETSRC ID: 0080886
Estimated Sample
Elm
AG
AL
AS
BA
BE
BI
CA
CD
CO
CR
CU
FE
K
LI
MG
MN
MO
NA
NI
P
PB
SB
SE
SN
SR
TI
TL
V
ZN
Result Detection Limit
<0.05 0.05
1.9 0.1
<0.2 0.2
0.038 0.003
<0.003 0.003
<0.2 0.2
1.1 0.2
<0.01 0.01
<0.05 0.05
<0.05 0.05
0.01 0.01
0.47 0.03
<1. 1.
<0.01 0.01
0.18 0.002
0. 02 0.01
0.17 0.03
1.0 0.07
<0.06 0.06
<0.5 0.5
<0.2 0.2
<0.2 0.2
<0.2 0.2
<0.2 0.2
0.020 0.002
0.27 0.01
<0.2 0.2
<0.02 0.02
<0.01 0.01
-------
Environmental Trace Substances Research Center
ICP Scan - Sample Analysis Report
Project: ENTROPY Units: MCG/ML
Batch #: B-90080874
Customer ID: 15
Description: FAN 1 PM10 2 E LEAD FILTER
ETSRC ID: 0080887
Estimated Sample
Elm
AG
AL
AS
BA
BE
BI
CA
CD
CO
CR
cu
FE
K
LI
MG
MN
MO
NA
NI
P
PB
SB
SE
SN
SR
TI
TL
V
ZN
Result Detection Limit
<0.05 0.05
0.88 0.1
<0.2 0.2
0.019 0.002
<0.002 0.002
<0.2 0.2
0.54 0.2
<0.01 0.01
<0.05 0.05
<0.05 0.05
0.042 0.01
0.45 0.03
<1. 1.
<0.01 0.01
0.412 0.002
0.01 0.01
0.05 0.02
0.44 0.05
<0.05 0.05
<0.7 0.7
<0.2 0.2
<0.2 0.2
<0.3 0.3
<0.2 0.2
0.006 0.002
0.22 0.01
<0.2 0.2
<0.02 0.02
0.03 0.01
-------
Environmental Trace Substances Research Center
ICP Scan - Sample Analysis Report
Project: ENTROPY Units: MCG/ML
Batch #: B-90080874
Customer ID: 16
Description: FAN 2 CTI/HI 3 A FILTER
ETSRC ID: 0080888
Estimated Sample
Elm
AG
AL
AS
BA
BE
BI
CA
CD
CO
CR
CU
FE
K
LI
MG
MN
MO
NA
NI
P
PB
SB
SE
SN
SR
V
ZN
Result Detection Limit
<0.05 0.05
2.6 0.1
<0.2 0.2
0.044 0.002
<0.002 0.002
<0.2 0.2
0.98 0.2
<0.01 0.01
<0.05 0.05
0.1 0.05
0.041 0.01
0.60 0.03
<1. 1.
<0.01 0.01
0.16 0.002
<0.01 0.01
0.21 0.03
0.82 0.05
<0.08 0.08
<0.7 0.7
<0.2 0.2
<0.2 0.2
<0.3 0.3
<0.2 0.2
0.023 0.002
0.035 0.01
<0.2 0.2
<0.02 0.02
<0.01 0.01
-------
Environmental Trace Substances Research Center
ICP Scan - Sample Analysis Report
Project: ENTROPY Units: MCG/ML
Batch #: B-90080874
Customer ID: 18
Description: FAN 2 CTI/HI 3 C FILTER
ETSRC ID: 0080889
Estimated Sample
Result Detection Limit
<0.05 0.05
2.5 0.1
<0.2 0.2
0.043 0.002
<0.002 0.002
<0.2 0.2
1.1 0.2
Elm
AG
AL
AS
BA
BE
BI
CA
CD
CO
CR
cu
FE
K
LI
MG
MN
MO
NA
NI
P
PB
SB
SE
SN
SR
TI
TL
V
ZN
<0.01 0.01
<0.05 0.05
0.34 0.05
0.031 0.01
1.4 0.03
<1. 1.
<0.01 0.01
0.19 0.002
0.053 0.01
0.18 0.03
0.91 0.05
0.58 0.05
<0.7 0.7
<0.2 0.2
<0.2 0.2
<0.3 0.3
<0.2 0.2
0.021 0.002
0.077 0.01
<0.2 0.2
<0.02 0.02
0.04 0.01
-------
Environmental Trace Substances Research Center
ICP Scan - Sample Analysis Report
Project: ENTROPY Units: MCG/ML
Batch #: B-90080874
Customer ID: 19
Description: FAN 2 CTI/LO 3 D FILTER
ETSRC ID: 0080890
Estimated Sample
Elm Result Detection Limit
AG <0.05 0.05
AL 2.8 0.1
AS <0.2 0.2
BA 0.043 0.002
BE <0.002 0.002
BI <0.2 0.2
CA 1.4 0.2
CD <0.01 0.01
CO <0.05 0.05
CR 0.68 0.05
CU 0.033 0.01
FE 2.6 0.03
K <1. 1.
LI <0.01 0.01
MG 0.355 0.002
MN 0.14 0.01
MO 0.21 0.03
NA 1.3 0.05
NI 1.7 0.05
P <0.7 0.7
PB <0.2 0.2
SB <0.2 0.2
SE <0.3 0.3
SN <0.2 0.2
SR 0.023 0.002
TI 0.040 0.01
TL <0.2 0.2
V <0.02 0.02
ZN 0.02 0.01
-------
Environmental Trace Substances Research Center
ICP Scan - Sample Analysis Report
Project: ENTROPY Units: MCG/ML
Batch #: B-90080874
Customer ID: 20
Description: FAN 3 PM10 3 E LEAD FILTER
ETSRC ID: 0080891
Estimated Sample
Elm
AG
AL
AS
BA
BE
BI
CA
CD
CO
CR
CU
FE
K
LI
MG
MN
MO
NA
NI
P
PB
SB
SE
SN
SR
TI
TL
V
ZN
Result Detection Limit
<0.05 0.05
1.4 0.1
<0.2 0.2
0.024 0.002
<0.002 0.002
<0.2 0.2
3.5 0.2
<0.01 0.01
<0.05 0.05
0.52 0.05
0.038 0.01
2.3 0.03
<1. 1.
<0.01 0.01
0.311 0.002
0.094 0.01
0.04 0.03
0.96 0.05
1.2 0.05
<0.7 0.7
<0.2 0.2
<0.2 0.2
<0.3 0.3
<0.2 0.2
0.0082 0.002
0.057 0.01
<0.2 0.2
<0.02 0.02
0.15 0.01
-------
Environmental Trace Substances Research Center
ICP Scan - Sample Analysis Report
Project: ENTROPY Units: MCG/ML
Batch #: B-90080874
Customer ID: 21
Description: FAN 2 CTI/HI 4 A FILTER
ETSRC ID: 0080892
Estimated Sample
Elm
AG
AL
AS
BA
BE
BI
CA
CD
CO
CR
cu
FE
K
LI
MG
MN
MO
NA
NI
P
PB
SB
SE
SN
SR
TI
TL
V
ZN
Result Detection Limit
<0.05 0.05
2.1 0.1
<0.2 0.2
0.036 0.002
<0.002 0.002
<0.2 0.2
0.93 0.2
<0.01 0.01
<0.05 0.05
0.76 0.05
0.060 0.01
3.26 0.03
<1. 1.
<0.01 0.01
0.20 0.002
0.15 0.01
0.17 0.03
0.80 0.05
1.9 0.05
<0.7 0.7
<0.2 0.2
<0.2 0.2
<0.3 0.3
<0.2 0.2
0.019 0.002
0.079 0.01
<0.2 0.2
<0.02 0.02
0.042 0.01
-------
Environmental Trace Substances Research Center
ICP Scan - Sample Analysis Report
Project: ENTROPY Units: MCG/ML
Batch #: B-90080874
Customer ID: 23
Description: FAN 4 CTI/HI 4 C FILTER
ETSRC ID: 0080893
Estimated Sample
Elm
AG
AL
AS
BA
BE
BI
CA
CD
CO
CR
CU
FE
K
LI
MG
MN
MO
NA
NI
P
PB
SB
SE
SN
SR
TI
TL
V
ZN
Result Detection Limit
<0.05 0-05
3.1 0.1
<0.2 0.2
0.038 0.002
<0.002 0.002
<0.2 0.2
1.3 0.2
<0.01 0.01
0.49 0.05
3.4 0.05
0.38 0.01
13.9 0.03
<1. 1.
<0.01 0.01
0.24 0.002
3.07 0.01
0.18 0.03
1.1 0.05
36.5 0.05
<0.8 0.8
<0.2 0.2
<0.2 0.2
<0.3 0.3
<0.2 0.2
0.022 0.002
0.062 0.01
<0.2 0.2
<0.02 0.02
0.38 0.02
-------
Environmental Trace Substances Research Center
TCP Scan - Sample Analysis Report
Project: ENTROPY Units: MCG/ML
Batch #: B-90080874
Customer ID: 24
Description: FAN 4 CTI/LO 4 D FILTER
ETSRC ID: 0080894
Estimated Sample
Elm
AG
AL
AS
BA
BE
BI
CA
CD
CO
CR
cu
FE
K
LI
MG
MN
MO
NA
NI
P
PB
SB
SE
SN
SR
TI
TL
V
ZN
Result Detection Limit
<0.05 0.05
2.5 0.1
<0.2 0.2
0.037 0.002
<0.002 0.002
<0.2 0.2
1.4 0.2
<0.01 0.01
0.80 0.05
9.70 0.05
0.58 0.01
43.1 0.03
<1. 1.
<0.01 0.01
0.259 0.002
4.86 0.01
0.21 0.03
1.2 0.05
61.3 0.05
<0.8 0.8
<0.2 0.2
<0.2 0.2
<0.3 0.3
<0.2 0.2
0.021 0.002
0.041 0.01
<0.3 0.3
0.04 0.02
0.58 0.02
-------
Environmental Trace Substances Research Center
ICP Scan - Sample Analysis Report
Project: ENTROPY Units: MCG/ML
Batch #: B-90080874
Customer ID: 25
Description: FAN 4 PM10 4 E LEAD FILTER
ETSRC ID: 0080897
Estimated Sample
Result Detection Limit
<0.05 0.05
0.70 0.1
<0.2 0.2
0.020 0.002
<0.005 0.005
<0.2 0.2
0.4 0.2
Elm
AG
AL
AS
BA
BE
BI
CA
CD
CO
CR
cu
FE
K
LI
MG
MN
MO
NA
NI
P
PB
SB
SE
SN
SR
TI
TL
V
ZN
<0.02 0.02
<0.05 0.05
<0.05 0.05
0.12 0.01
0.11 0.03
<1. 1.
<0.01 0.01
0.11 0.002
0.01 0.01
0.05 0.02
0.34 0.07
<0.07 0.07
<0.5 0.5
<0.2 0.2
<0.2 0.2
<0.2 0.2
<0.2 0.2
0.0080 0.002
0.048 0.01
<0.3 0.3
<0.02 0.02
<0.01 0.01
-------
Environmental Trace Substances Research Center
ICP Scan - Sample Analysis Report
Project: ENTROPY Units: MCG/ML
Batch #: B-90080874
Customer ID: 27
Description: FAN 3 CTI/LO 1 D NITRIC
ETSRC ID: 0080898
Estimated Sample
Elm
AG
AL
AS
BA
BE
BI
CA
CD
CO
CR
CU
FE
K
LI
MG
MN
MO
NA
NI
P
PB
SB
SE
SN
SR
TI
TL
V
ZN
Result Detection Limit
0.02 0.01
1.5 0.02
<0.04 0. 04
0.037 0.0005
<0.001 0.001
<0. 04 0.04
8.9 0.5
0.012 0.003
<0.01 0.01
0.14 0.01
0.327 0.002
1.27 0.005
4.6 0.3
0.004 0.002
2.3 0.03
1.41 0.002
0.008 0.005
9.81 0.01
0.054 0.01
0.82 0.09
0.06 0.04
<0.04 0.04
<0.05 0.05
<0.04 0.04
0.0555 0.0005
0.031 0.002
<0. 06 0.06
<0.004 0.004
1.25 0.003
-------
Environmental Trace Substances Research Center
ICP Scan - Sample Analysis Report
Project: ENTROPY Units: MCG/ML
Batch #: B-90080874
Customer ID: 29
Description: FAN 1 CTI/LO 2 D NITRIC
ETSRC ID: 0080899
Estimated Sample
Result Detection Limit
<0.01 0.01
0.70 0.02
<0.04 0.04
0.016 0.0005
<0.001 0.001
<0.04 0.04
Elm
AG
AL
AS
BA
BE
BI
CA
CD
CO
CR
CU
FE
K
LI
MG
MN
MO
NA
NI
P
PB
SB
SE
SN
SR
TI
TL
V
ZN
4.1 0.5
0.005 0.003
<0.01 0.01
0.047 0.01
0.067 0.002
0.607 0.005
<0.3 0.3
<0.002 0.002
1-2 0.03
0.022 0.002
<0.005 0.005
3.18 0.01
0.02 0.01
0-1 0.09
0.06 0.04
<0.04 0.04
<0.05 0.05
<0.04 0.04
0.024 0.0005
0.014 0.002
<0.06 0.06
<0.004 0.004
°-377 0.003
-------
Environmental Trace Substances Research Center
ICP Scan - Sample Analysis Report
project: ENTROPY Units: MCG/ML
Batch #: B-90080874
Customer ID: 31
Description: FAN 2 CTI.LO 3 D NITRIC
ETSRC ID: 0080900
Estimated Sample
Elm Result Detection Limit
AG <0.01 0.01
AL 1.1 0.02
AS <0.04 0.04
BA 0.019 0.0005
BE<0.001 0.001
BI <0.04 0.04
CA 10. 0.5
CD 0.014 0.003
CO <0.01 0.01
CR 0.094 0.01
CU 0.059 0.002
FE 1.06 0.005
K 4.5 0.3
LI 0.005 0.002
MG 3.32 0.03
MN 0.043 0.002
MO <0.005 0.005
NA 6.16 0.01
NI 0.04 0.01
P 0.30 0.09
PB <0.04 0.04
SB <0.04 0.04
SE <0.05 0.05
SN <0.04 0.04
SR 0.049 0.0005
TI 0.022 0.002
TL <0.06 0.06
V <0.004 0.004
ZN 0.714 0.003
-------
Environmental Trace Substances Research Center
ICP Scan - Sample Analysis Report
Project: ENTROPY Units: MCG/ML
Batch #: B-90080874
Customer ID: 33
Description: FAN 4 CTI/LO 4 D NITRIC
ETSRC ID: 0080901
Estimated Sample
Elm Result Detection Limit
AG <0.01 0.01
AL 1.5 0.02
AS <0.04 0.04
BA 0.036 0.0005
BE <0.001 0.001
BI <0.04 0.04
CA 16. 0.5
CD 0.023 0.003
CO <0.01 0.01
CR 0.096 0.01
CU 0.230 0.002
FE 2.39 0.005
K 4.8 0.3
LI 0.005 0.002
MG 5.92 0.03
MN 0.063 0.002
MO 0.006 0.005
NA 10.7 0.01
NI 0.071 0.01
P 0.33 0.09
PB 0.07 0.04
SB <0.04 0.04
SE <0.05 0.05
SN <0.04 0.04
SR 0.0800 0.0005
TI 0.083 0.002
TL <0.06 0.06
V 0.008 0.004
ZN 1.11 0.003
-------
Environmental Trace Substances Research Center
ICP Scan - Sample Analysis Report
project: ENTROPY Units: MCG/ML
Batch #: B-90080874
Customer ID: 34
Description: FAN 2 CTI/HI 1 A NITRIC
ETSRC ID: 0080902
Estimated Sample
Elm
AG
AL
AS
BA
BE
BI
CA
CD
CO
CR
cu
FE
K
LI
MG
MN
MO
NA
NI
P
PB
SB
SE
SN
SR
TI
TL
V
ZN
Result Detection Limit
0.02 0.01
2.39 0.02
<0.04 0.04
0.021 0.0005
<0.001 0.001
<0.04 0.04
6.0 0.5
0.009 0.003
<0.01 0.01
0.28 0.01
0.201 0.002
1.58 0.005
2.7 0.3
0.003 0.002
1.7 0.03
0.19 0.002
<0.005 0.005
6.49 0.01
0.32 0.01
0.40 0.09
0. 04 0.04
<0.04 0.04
<0.05 0.05
<0.04 0.04
0.038 0.0005
0.026 0.002
<0.06 0.06
<0.004 0.004
0.941 0.003
-------
Environmental Trace Substances Research Center
ICP Scan - Sample Analysis Report
Project: ENTROPY Units: MCG/ML
Batch #: B-90080874
Customer ID: 37
Description: FAN 3 CTI/HI 1 C NITRIC
ETSRC ID: 0080903
Estimated Sample
Elm
AG
AL
AS
BA
BE
BI
CA
CD
CO
CR
CU
FE
K
LI
MG
MN
MO
NA
NI
P
PB
SB
SE
SN
SR
TI
TL
V
ZN
Result Detection Limit
0.02 0.01
1.0 0.02
<0.04 0.04
0.028 0.0005
<0.001 0.001
<0.04 0.04
7.3 0.5
0.024 0.003
<0.01 0.01
0.091 0.01
0.231 0.002
1.36 0.005
3.4 0.3
0.004 0.002
2.4 0.03
0.14 0.002
0.006 0.005
8.01 0.01
0.053 0.01
0.64 0.09
0.08 0.04
<0.04 0.04
0.05 0.05
<0.04 0.04
0.043 0.0005
0.032 0.002
<0.06 0.06
<0.004 0.004
1.17 0.003
-------
Environmental Trace Substances Research Center
ICP Scan - Sample Analysis Report
Project: ENTROPY Units: MCG/ML
Batch #: B-90080874
Customer ID: 39
Description: FAN 3 CTI/HI 1 C NITRIC
ETSRC ID: 0080904
Estimated Sample
Elm
AG
AL
AS
BA
BE
BI
CA
CD
CO
CR
CU
FE
K
LI
MG
MN
MO
NA
NI
P
PB
SB
SE
SN
SR
TI
TL
V
ZN
Result Detection Limit
0.17 0.01
3.10 0.02
5.24 0.04
0.274 0.0005
0.261 0.001
<0.04 0.04
3.8 0.5
2.70 0.004 -
2.49 0.01
2.58 0.01
2.69 0.002
3.30 0.005
15. 0.3
<0.002 0.002
3.75 0.03
2.56 0.002
<0.005 0.005
6.71 0.01
2.70 0.01
<0.1 0.1
2.6 0.04
<0.04 0.04
12.9 0.05
<0.04 0.04
0.297 0.0005
0.016 0 . 002
<0 . 06 0.06
<0.004 0.004
3.23 0.004 -
-------
Environmental Trace Substances Research Center
ICP Scan - Sample Analysis Report
Project: ENTROPY Units: MCG/ML
Batch #: B-90080874
Customer ID: 40
Description: FAN 2 CTI/HI 2 A NITRIC
ETSRC ID: 0080905
Estimated Sample
Elm
AG
AL
AS
BA
BE
BI
CA
CD
CO
CR
cu
FE
K
LI
MG
MN
MO
NA
NI
P
PB
SB
SE
SN
SR
TI
TL
V
ZN
Result Detection Limit
0.02 0.01
0.46 0.02
<0.04 0.04
0.017 0.0005
<0.001 0.001
<0.04 0.04
5.1 0.5
0.008 0.003
<0.01 0.01
0.079 0.01
0.071 0.002
0.738 0.005
3.1 0.3
0.002 0.002
1.7 0.03
0.20 0.002
<0.005 0.005
5.42 0.01
0.04 0.01
0.48 0.09
0.05 0.04
<0.04 0.04
<0.05 0.05
<0.04 0.04
0.026 0.0005
0.016 0.002
<0.06 0.06
<0.004 0.004
0.485 0.003
-------
Environmental Trace Substances Research Center
ICP Scan - Sample Analysis Report
Project: ENTROPY Units: MCG/ML
Batch #: B-90080874
Customer ID: 43
Description: FAN 1 CTI/HI 2 C NITRIC
ETSRC ID: 0080906
Estimated Sample
Elm Result Detection Limit
AG <0.01 0.01
AL 1.6 0.02
AS <0.04 0.04
BA 0.019 0.0005
BE 0.001 0.001
BI <0.04 0.04
CA 7.5 0.5
CD 0.033 0.003
CO <0.01 0.01
CR 0.039 0.01
CU 0.084 0.002
FE 0.836 0.005
K 3.3 0.3
LI 0.004 0.002
MG 2.2 0.03
MN 0.588 0.002
MO <0.005 0.005
NA 4.48 0.01
NI 0.03 0.01
P 0.33 0.09
PB <0.04 0.04
SB <0.04 0.04
SE <0.05 0.05
SN <0.04 0.04
SR 0.032 0.0005
TI 0.023 0.002
TL <0.06 0.06
V <0.004 0.004
ZN 0.427 0.003
-------
Quality Control Report
Environmental Trace Substances Research Center
ICP Scan - Blank Report
Project: ENTROPY Units: MCG
Batch #: B-90080874
Customer ID: BLANK 1
Description: BLANK
ETSRC ID: 0080874
Estimated Sample
Detection Limit
0.01
0.02
0.04
0.0005
0.0006
0.04
0.03
0.002
0.01
0.01
0.002
0.005
0.3
0.002
0.0005
0.002
0.005
0.01
0.01
0.1
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.0005
0.002
0.05
0.003
0.002
Elm
AG
AL
AS
BA
BE
BI
CA
CD
CO
CR
CU
FE
K
LI
MG
MN
MO
NA
NI
p
PB
SB
SE
SN
SR
TI
TL
V
ZN
Result
<0.01
<0.02
<0.04
<0.0005
<0.0006
<0.04
<0.03
<0.002
<0.01
<0.01
<0.002
<0.005
<0.3
<0.002
<0.0005
<0.002
<0.005
<0.01
<0.01
<0 . 1
<0.04
<0.04
<0.04
<0.04
<0.0005
<0.002
<0.05
<0.003
<0.002
-------
Quality Control Report
Environmental Trace Substances Research Center
ICP Scan - Blank Report
Project: ENTROPY Units: MCG
Batch #: B-90080874
Customer ID: BLANK 3
Description: BLANK
ETSRC ID: 0080918
Estimated Sample
Elm
AG
AL
AS
BA
BE
BI
CA
CD
CO
CR
CU
FE
K
LI
MG
MN
MO
NA
NI
P
PB
SB
SE
SN
SR
TI
TL
V
ZN
Result Detection Limit
<0.05 0.05
<0.1 0.1
<0.2 0.2
<0.002 0.002
<0.005 0.005
<0.2 0.2
<0.2 0.2
<0.02 0.02
<0.05 0.05
<0.05 0.05
0.036 0.01
<0.02 0.02
<1. 1.
<0.01 0.01
<0.002 0.002
<0.01 0.01
<0.02 0.02
<0.07 0.07
<0.07 0.07
<0.4 0.4
<0.2 0.2
<0.2 0.2
<0.2 0.2
<0.2 0.2
<0.002 0.002
<0.01 0.01
<0.3 0.3
<0.02 0.02
<0.01 0.01
-------
Environmental Trace Substances Research Center
ICP Scan - Sample Analysis Report
Project: ENTROPY Units: MCG/ML
Batch #: B-90080874
Customer ID: 45
Description: FAN 1 CTI/HI 2 C NITRIC
ETSRC ID: 0080907
Estimated Sample
Elm
AG
AL
AS
BA
BE
BI
CA
CD
CO
CR
cu
FE
K
LI
MG
MN
MO
NA
NI
P
PB
SB
SE
SN
SR
TI
TL
V
ZN
Result Detection Limit
0.086 0.01
2.88 0.02
5.30 0.04
0.281 0.0005
0.267 0.001
<0.04 0.04
3.8 0.5
2.79 0.004
2.54 0.01
2.61 0.01
2.63 0.002
3.10 0.005
15. 0.3
0.002 0.002
3.66 0.03
2.83 0.002
<0.005 0.005
4.91 0.01
2.74 0.01
<0.1 0.1
2.7 0.04
<0.04 0.04
13.0 0.05
<0.04 0.04
0.294 0.0005
0.010 0.002
<0.06 0.06
<0.004 0.004
2.94 0.004
-------
Environmental Trace Substances Research Center
ICP Scan - Sample Analysis Report
Project: ENTROPY Units: MCG/ML
Batch #: B-90080874
Customer ID: 46
Description: FAN 2 CTI/HI 3 A NITRIC
ETSRC ID: 0080908
Estimated Sample
Elm : Result Detection Limit
AG : <0.01 0.01
AL : 0.66 0.02
AS
BA
BE
BI
CA
CD
CO
CR
CU
FE
K
LI
MG
MN
MO
NA
NI
P
PB
SB
SE
SN
SR
TI
TL
V
ZN
<0.04 0.04
0-°15 0.0005
0.001 0.001
<0.04 0.04
5.8 0.5
0.051 0.003 -
0.047 0.01
0.088 0.01
0.056 0.002
0.727 0.005
1.6 0.3
0.003 0.002
1.2 0.03
0,11 0.002
<0.005 0.005
2.57 0.01
0.04 0.01
0.2 0.09
<0.04 0.04
<0.04 0.04
<0.05 0.05
<0.04 0.04
0.018 0.0005
0.033 0.002
<0.06 0.06
<0.004 0.004
1.17 0.003 -
-------
Environmental Trace Substances Research Center
ICP Scan - Sample Analysis Report
Project: ENTROPY Units: MCG/ML
Batch #: B-90080874
Customer ID: 49
Description: FAN 2 CTI/HI 3 C NITRIC
ETSRC ID: 0080909
Estimated Sample
Detection Limit
0.01
0.02
0.04
0.0005
0.001
0.04
0.5
0.003
0.01
0.01
0.002
0.005
0.3
0.002
0.03
0.002
0.005
0.01
0.01
0.1
0.04
0.04
0.05
0.04
0.0005
0.002
0.06
0.004
0.003
Elm
AG
AL
AS
BA
BE
BI
CA
CD
CO
CR
cu
FE
K
LI
MG
MN
MO
NA
NI
P
PB
SB
SE
SN
SR
TI
TL
V
ZN
Result
0.54
1.1
1.2
0.0800
0.002
<0.04
4.9
0.028
0.55
0.065
0.618
4.09
2.1
0.003
1.6
0.13
<0.005
3.36
0.057
0.2
0.59
<0.04
2.8
<0.04
0.0813
0.079
<0.06
<0.004
1.17
-------
Environmental Trace Substances Research Center
ICP Scan - Sample Analysis Report
Project: ENTROPY Units: MCG/ML
Batch #: B-90080874
Customer ID: 51
Description: FAN 2 CTI/HI 3 C NITRIC
ETSRC ID: 0080910
Estimated Sample
Elm Result Detection Limit
AG 0.2 5 0.01
AL 3.14 0.02
AS 5.68 0.04
BA 0.307 0.0005
BE 0.253 0.0005
BI <0.04 0.04
CA 3 .0 0.3
CD 2.71 0.003
CO 2.79 0.01
CR 2.54 0.01
CU 2.86 0.002
FE 4.83 0.005
K 14. 0.2
LI <0.002 0.002
MG 3.30 0.02
MN 2.58 0.002
MO <0.005 0.005
NA 4.50 0.01
NI 2.63 0.01
P <0.2 0.2
PB 2.9 0.04
SB <0.04 0.04
SE 14.0 0.06
SN <0.04 0.04
SR 0.312 0.0005
TI 0.041 0.002
TL <0.04 0.04
V <0.004 0.004
ZN 3.29 0.003
-------
Environmental Trace Substances Research Center
ICP Scan - Sample Analysis Report
Project: ENTROPY Units: MCG/ML
Batch #: B-90080874
Customer ID: 52
Description: FAN 2 CTI/HI 4 A NITRIC
ETSRC ID: 0080911
Estimated Sample
Elm
AG
AL
AS
BA
BE
BI
CA
CD
CO
CR
CU
FE
K
LI
MG
MN
MO
NA
NI
P
PB
SB
SE
SN
SR
TI
TL
V
ZN
Result Detection Limit
<0.0l 0.01
0.55 0.02
<0.04 0.04
0.019 0.0005
0.001 0.001
<0.04 0.04
8.4 0.5
0.028 0.003
0.01 0.01
0.081 0.01
0.080 0.002
0.874 0.005
2.9 0.3
0.003 0.002
2.6 0.03
0.11 0.002
<0.005 0.005
5.59 0.01
0.050 0.01
0.45 0.09
<0.04 0.04
<0.04 0.04
<0.05 0.05
<0.04 0.04
0.040 0.0005
0.014 0.002
<0.06 0.06
<0.004 0.004
0.469 0.003
-------
Environmental Trace Substances Research Center
ICP Scan - Sample Analysis Report
Project: ENTROPY Units: MCG/ML
Batch #: B-90080874
Customer ID: 55
Description: FAN 4 CTI/HI 4 C NITRIC
ETSRC ID: 0080912
Estimated Sample
Elm Result Detection Limit
AG <0.01 0.01
AL 0.69 0.02
AS <0.04 0.04
BA 0.027 0.0005
BE 0.001 0.001
BI <0.04 0.04
CA 11. 0.5
CD 0.01 0.003
CO 0.049 0.01
CR 0.070 0.01
CU 0.063 0.002
FE 1.01 0.005
K 1.7 0.3
LI 0.002 0.002
MG 1.4 0.03
MN 0.090 0.002
MO <0.005 0.005
NA 2.70 0.01
NI 0.03 0.01
P 0.31 0.09
PB <0.04 0.04
SB <0.04 0.04
SE <0.05 0.05
SN <0.04 0.04
SR 0.019 0.0005
TI 0.033 0.002
TL <0.06 0.06
V 0.004 0.004
ZN 7.28 0.003
-------
Environmental Trace Substances Research Center
ICP Scan - Sample Analysis Report
Project: ENTROPY Units: MCG/ML
Batch #: B-90080874
Customer ID: 57
Description: FAN 4 CTI/HI 4 C NITRIC
ETSRC ID: 0080913
Estimated Sample
Elm Result Detection Limit
AG 0.090 0.01
AL 2.88 0.02
AS 5.13 0.04
BA 0.273 0.0005
BE 0.261 0.001
BI <0.04 0.04
CA 6.0 0.5
CD 2.67 0.004
CO 2.48 0.01
CR 2.54 0.01
CU 2.58 0.002
FE 3.11 0.005
K 14. 0.3
LI <0.002 0.002
MG 3.2 0.03
MN 2.51 0.002
MO <0.005 0.005
NA 4.11 0.01
NI 2.67 0.01
P <0.1 0.1
PB 2 . 6 0.04
SB <0.04 0.04
SE 12.7 0.05
SN <0.04 0.04
SR 0.284 0.0005
TI 0.017 0.002
TL <0.06 0.06
V <0.004 0.004
ZN 6.25 0.003
-------
Environmental Trace Substances Research Center
ICP Scan - Sample Analysis Report
Project: ENTROPY Units: MCG/ML
Batch #: B-90080874
Customer ID: 58
Description: AMBIENT FILTER RUN 2
ETSRC ID: 0080914
Estimated Sample
Elm Result Detection Limit
AG <0.05 0.05
AL 2.5 0.1
AS <0.2 0.2
BA 0.047 0.002
BE <0.005 0.005
BI <0.2 0.2
CA 1. 1 0.2
CD <0.02 0.02
CO <0.05 0.05
CR <0.05 0.05
CU 0.17 0.01
FE 0.3 2 0.03
K <1. 1.
LI < 0 . 01 0.01
MG 0.19 0.002
MN 0.02 0.01
MO 0.21 0.03
NA 0.89 0.07
NI <0-07 0.07
P <0.5 0.5
PB <0.2 0.2
SB <0.2 0.2
SE <0.2 0.2
SN <0.2 0.2
SR 0.022 0.002
TI 0.057 0.01
TL <0.3 0.3
V <0.02 0.02
ZN 0.02 0.01
-------
Environmental Trace Substances Research Center
ICP Scan - Sample Analysis Report
Project: ENTROPY Units: MCG/ML
Batch #: B-90080874
Customer ID: 59
Description: AMBIENT FILTER RUN 3
ETSRC ID: 0080915
Estimated Sample
Elm
AG
AL
AS
BA
BE
BI
CA
CD
CO
CR
CU
FE
K
LI
MG
MN
MO
NA
NI
P
PB
SB
SE
SN
SR
TI
TL
V
ZN
Result Detection Limit
<0.05 0.05
2.6 0.1
<0.2 0.2
0.050 0.002
<0.005 0.005
<0.2 0.2
1.0 0.2
<0.02 0.02
<0.05 0.05
<0.05 0.05
0.078 0.01
0.33 0.03
<1. 1.
<0.01 0.01
0.19 0.002
0.02 0.01
0.22 0.03
0.89 0.07
<0.07 0.07
<0.5 0.5
<0.2 0.2
<0.2 0.2
<0.2 0.2
<0.2 0.2
0.023 0.002
0.037 0.01
<0.3 0.3
<0.02 0.02
0.064 0.01
-------
Environmental Trace Substances Research Center
ICP Scan - Sample Analysis Report
Project: ENTROPY Units: MCG/ML
Batch #: B-90080874
Customer ID: 60
Description: AMBIENT FILTER RUN 4
ETSRC ID: 0080916
Estimated Sample
Elm
AG
AL
AS
BA
BE
BI
CA
CD
CO
CR
CU
FE
K
LI
MG
MN
MO
NA
NI
P
PB
SB
SE
SN
SR
TI
TL
V
ZN
Result Detection Limit
<0.05 0.05
2.6 0.1
<0.2 0.2
0.050 0.002
<0.005 0.005
<0.2 0.2
1.0 0.2
<0.02 0.02
<0.05 0.05
0.05 0.05
0.12 0.01
0.51 0.03
<1. 1.
<0.01 0.01
0.24 0.002
0.02 0.01
0.21 0.03
0.90 0.07
<0.07 0.07
<0.5 0.5
<0.2 0.2
<0.2 0.2
<0.2 0.2
<0.2 0.2
0. 022 0.002
0.096 0.01
<0.3 0.3
<0.02 0.02
0.02 0.01
-------
Environmental Trace substances Research Center
ICP Scan - Sample Analysis Report
Project: ENTROPY Units: MCG/ML
Batch #: B-90080874
Customer ID: 68
Description: WATER RUN #4
ETSRC ID: 0080926
Estimated Sample
Elm
AG
AL
AS
BA
BE
BI
CA
CD
CO
CR
cu
FE
K
LI
MG
MN
MO
NA
NI
P
PB
SB
SE
SN
SR
V
ZN
Result Detection Limit
<0.05 0.05
<0.1 0.1
<0.2 0.2
0.23 0.002
<0.002 0.002
<0.2 0.2
370. 2.
<0.01 0.01
<0.05 0.05
<0.05 0.05
0.035 0.01
<0.03 0.03
40. 1.
0.051 0.01
111. 0.08
0.02 0.01
0.086 0.02
211. 0.05
<0.05 0.05
<0.7 0.7
<0.2 0.2
<0.2 0.2
<0.3 0.3
<0.2 0.2
2.08 0.003
0.061 0.01
<0.2 0.2
<0.02 0.02
<0.01 0.01
-------
Environmental Trace Substances Research Center
ICP Scan - Sample Analysis Report
Project: ENTROPY Units: MCG/ML
Batch #: B-90080874
Customer ID: 65
Description: WATER RUN #1
ETSRC ID: 0080923
Estimated Sample
Elm Result Detection Limit
AG <0.05 0.05
AL <0.1 0.1
AS <0.2 0.2
BA 0.23 0.002
BE <0.002 0.002
BI <0.2 0.2
CA 365. 2.
CD <0.01 0.01
CO <0.05 0.05
CR <0.05 0.05
CU 0.088 0.01
FE 0.092 0.03
K 40. 1.
LI 0.048 0.01
MG 109. 0.08
MN 0.03 0.01
MO 0.086 0.02
NA 205. 0.05
NI <0.05 0.05
P <0.7 0.7
PB <0.2 0.2
SB <0.2 0.2
SE <0.3 0.3
SN <0.2 0.2
SR 2.01 0.003
TI 0.055 0.01
TL <0.2 0.2
V <0.02 0.02
ZN 0.049 0.01
-------
Environmental Trace Substances Research Center
ICP Scan - Sample Analysis Report
Project: ENTROPY Units: MCG/ML
Batch #: B-90080874
Customer ID: 66
Description: WATER RUN #2
ETSRC ID: 0080924
Estimated Sample
Elm
AG
AL
AS
BA
BE
BI
CA
CD
CO
CR
cu
FE
K
LI
MG
MN
MO
NA
NI
P
PB
SB
SE
SN
SR
TI
TL
V
ZN
Result Detection Limit
<0.05 0.05
<0.1 0.1
<0.2 0.2
0.23 0.002
<0.002 0.002
<0.2 0.2
377. 2.
<0.01 0.01
<0.05 0.05
<0.05 0.05
0.059 0.01
0.06 0.03
41. 1.
0.052 0.01
113. 0.08
0.02 0.01
0.089 0.02
213. 0.05
<0.05 0.05
<0.7 0.7
<0.2 0.2
<0.2 0.2
<0.3 0.3
<0.2 0.2
2.08 0.003
0.058 0.01
<0.2 0.2
<0.02 0.02
0.040 0.01
-------
Environmental Trace Substances Research Center
ICP Scan - Sample Analysis Report
Project: ENTROPY Units: MCG/ML
Batch #: B-90080874
Customer ID: 67
Description: WATER RUN #3
ETSRC ID: 0080925
Estimated Sample
Elm Result Detection Limit
AG <0.05 0.05
AL <0.1 0.!
AS <0.2 0.2
BA 0.22 0.002
BE <0.002 0.002
BI <0.2 0.2
CA 357. 2.
CD <0.01 0.01
CO <0.05 0.05
CR <0.05 0.05
CU 0.03 0.01
FE 0.0 3 0.03
K 40. 1.
LI 0.049 0.01
MG 108. 0.08
MN 0.02 0.01
MO 0.078 0.02
NA 203. 0.05
NI <0.05 0.05
P <0.7 0.7
PB <0.2 0.2
SB <0.2 0.2
SE <0.3 0.3
SN <0.2 0.2
SR 1.98 0.003
TI 0.055 0.01
TL <0.2 0.2
V <0.02 0.02
ZN <0.01 0.01
-------
Environmental Trace Substances Research Center
ICP Scan - Sample Analysis Report
Project: ENTROPY Units: MCG/ML
Batch #: B-90080874
Customer ID: 61
Description: WATER FILTER RUN 1
ETSRC ID: 0080919
Estimated Sample
Result Detection Limit
<0.05 0.05
2.4 0.1
<0.2 0.2
0.14 0.002
<0.002 0.002
<0.2 0.2
44. 2.
Elm
AG
AL
AS
BA
BE
BI
CA
CD
CO
CR
CU
FE
K
LI
MG
MN
MO
NA
NI
P
PB
SB
SE
SN
SR
TI
TL
V
ZN
<0.01 0.01
<0.05 0.05
0.17 0.05
0.16 0.01
3.59 0.03
<0.01 0.01
3.04 0.002
0.11 0.01
0.06 0.03
3.3 0.05
0.08 0.05
1. 0.7
<0.2 0.2
<0.2 0.2
<0.3 0.3
<0.2 0.2
0.21 0.003
0.13 0.01
<0.2 0.2
<0.02 0.02
0.70 0.01
-------
Environmental Trace Substances Research Center
ICP Scan - Sample Analysis Report
Project: ENTROPY Units: MCG/ML
Batch #: B-90080874
Customer ID: 62
Description: WATER FILTER RUN 2
ETSRC ID: 0080920
Estimated Sample
Elm Result Detection Limit
AG <0.05 0.05
AL 1.3 0.1
AS <0.2 0.2
BA 0.052 0.002
BE <0.002 0.002
BI <0.2 0.2
CA 13. 2.
CD <0.01 0.01
CO <0.05 0.05
CR 0.07 0.05
CU 0.052 0.01
FE 1.3 0.03
K <1. 1.
LI <0.01 0.01
MG 1.39 0.002
MN 0.039 0.01
MO 0.05 0.03
NA 2.1 0.05
NI <0.05 0.05
P <0.7 0.7
PB <0.2 0.2
SB <0.2 0.2
SE <0.3 0.3
SN <0.2 0.2
SR 0.066 0.002
TI 0.11 0.01
TL <0.2 0.2
V <0.02 0.02
ZN 0.45 0.01
-------
Environmental Trace Substances Research Center
ICP Scan - Sample Analysis Report
Project: ENTROPY Units: MCG/ML
Batch #: B-90080874
Customer ID: 63
Description: WATER FILTER RUN 3
ETSRC ID: 0080921
Estimated Sample
Elm Result Detection Limit
AG <0.05 0.05
AL 0.94 0.1
AS <0.2 0.2
BA 0.032 0.002
BE <0.002 0.002
BI <0.2 0.2
CA 8.7 2.
CD <0.01 0.01
CO <0.05 0.05
CR 0.08 0.05
CU 0.074 0.01
FE 0.80 0.03
K <1. 1.
LI <0.01 0.01
MG 1.64 0.002
MN 0.02 0.01
MO 0.05 0.03
NA 3.0 0.05
NI <0.05 0.05
P <0.7 0.7
PB <0.2 0.2
SB <0.2 0.2
SE <0.3 0.3
SN <0.2 0.2
SR 0.052 0.002
TI 0.10 0.01
TL <0.2 0.2
V <0.02 0.02
ZN 0.15 0.01
-------
Environmental Trace Substances Research Center
ICP Scan - Sample Analysis Report
Project: ENTROPY Units: MCG/ML
Batch #: B-90080874
Customer ID: 64
Description: WATER FILTER RUN 4
ETSRC ID: 0080922
Estimated Sample
Detection Limit
0.05
0.1
0.2
0.002
0.002
0.2
2.
0.01
0.05
0.05
0.01
0.03
1.
0.01
0.002
0.01
0.03
0.05
0.06
0.7
0.2
0.2
Elm
AG
AL
AS
BA
BE
BI
CA
CD
CO
CR
CU
FE
K
LI
MG
MN
MO
NA
NI
P
PB
SB
SE
SN
SR
TI
TL
V
ZN
Result
<0.05
0.82
<0.2
0.029
<0.002
<0.2
7.6
<0.01
<0.05
0.05
0.050
0.66
<1.
<0.01
1.37
0.01
0.05
3.1
<0.06
<0.7
<0.2
<0.2
<0.3
<0.2
0.044
0.044
<0.2
<0.02
0.16
°-01
°'2
°'02
-------
Environmental Trace Substances Research Center
ICP Scan - Sample Analysis Report
Project: ENTROPY Units: MCG/ML
Batch #: B-90080874
Customer ID: 69
Description: WATER RUN 1
ETSRC ID: 0080927
Estimated Sample
Elm Result Detection Limit
AG 0.08 0.05
AL 2 6.3 0.1
AS 51.2 0.2
BA 2.74 0.002
BE 2.59 0.002
BI <0.2 0.2
CA 184. 2.
CD 26.3 0.02
CO 25.0 0.05
CR 25.2 0.05
CU 25.6 0.01
FE 29.7 0.03
K 150. 1.
LI 0.02 0.01
MG 78.5 0.08
MN 25.3 0.01
MO 0.05 0.03
NA 129. 0.05
NI 26.1 0.05
P <1. 1.
PB 25.4 0.2
SB <0.2 0.2
SE 127. 0.3
SN <0.2 0.2
SR 3.75 0.003
TI 0.03 0.01
TL <0.2 0.2
V <0.02 0.02
ZN 25.6 0.02
-------
Environmental Trace Substances Research Center
ICP Scan - Sample Analysis Report
project: ENTROPY Units: MCG/ML
Batch #: B-90080874
Customer ID: 70
Description: WATER RUN 2
ETSRC ID: 0080928
Estimated Sample
Elm
AG
AL
AS
BA
BE
BI
CA
CD
CO
CR
CU
FE
K
LI
MG
MN
MO
NA
NI
P
PB
SB
SE
SN
SR
TI
TL
V
ZN
Result Detection Limit
O.l 0.05
25.9 0.1
50.5 0.2
2.68 0.002
2.56 0.002
<0.2 0.2
181. 2.
26.0 0.02
24.7 0.05
24.9 0.05
25.2 0.01
26.7 0.03
148. !
0.02 0.01
77.9 0.08
24^9 0.01
0.04 O-03
127. O-05
25.7 0.05
<1. 1-
25.1 °-2
<0.2 °-2
125. °'3
<0.2 °'2
3.70 °-003
0.03 °-01
<0.2 °'2
<0.02 °'02
25.3 °-02
-------
Environmental Trace Substances Research Center
ICP Scan - Sample Analysis Report
Project: ENTROPY Units: MCG/ML
Batch #: B-90080874
Customer ID: 71
Description: WATER RUN 3
ETSRC ID: 0080929
Estimated Sample
Elm Result Detection Limit
AG 0.06 0.05
AL 26.7 0.1
AS 52.2 0.2
BA 2.75 0.002
BE 2.63 0.002
BI <0.2 0.2
CA 179. 2.
CD 27.1 0.02
CO 25.5 0.05
CR 25.8 0.05
CU 26.1 0.01
FE 27.6 0.03
K 153. 1.
LI 0.02 0.01
MG 77.8 0.08
MN 25.7 0.01
MO 0.04 0.03
NA 128. 0.05
NI 26.5 0.05
P <1. 1.
PB 2 6.1 0.2
SB <0.2 0.2
SE 129. 0.3
SN <0.2 0.2
SR 3.78 0.003
TI 0.02 0.01
TL <0.2 0.2
V <0.02 0.02
ZN 26.3 0.02
-------
Environmental Trace Substances Research Center
ICP Scan - Sample Analysis Report
Project: ENTROPY Units: MCG/ML
Batch #: B-90080874
Customer ID: 72
Description: WATER RUN 4
ETSRC ID: 0080930
Estimated Sample
Elm Result Detection Limit
AG <0.05 0.05
AL 26.9 0.1
AS 52.1 0.2
BA 2.79 0.002
BE 2.65 0.002
BI <0.2 0.2
CA 184. 2.
CD 27.1 0.02
CO 25.6 0.05
CR 25.8 0.05
CU 26.2 0.01
FE 27.7 0.03
K 154. 1.
LI 0.02 0.01
MG 79.9 0.08
MN 25.8 0.01
MO 0.03 0.03
NA 131. 0.05
NI 26.5 0.05
P <1. 1«
PB 26.2 0.2
SB <0.2 0.2
SE 130. 0.3
SN <0.2 0.2
SR 3.84 0.003
TI 0.02 0.01
TL <0.2 O-2
V <0.02 O-02
ZN 26.3 °-02
-------
Environmental Trace Substances Research Center
ICP Scan - Sample Analysis Report
Project: ENTROPY Units: MCG/ML
Batch #: B-90080874
Customer ID: 73
Description: LOW AUDIT
ETSRC ID: 0080931
Estimated Sample
Elm Result Detection Limit
AG <0.05 0.05
AL 5.1 0.1
AS 10. 0.2
BA 0.538 0.002
BE 0.52 0.005
BI <0.2 0.2
CA 0.89 0.2
CD 5.28 0.02
CO 5.07 0.05
CR 5.20 0.05
CU 5.18 0.01
FE 5.37 0.03
K 29. 1.
LI <0.01 0.01
MG 5.2 0.2
MN 5.13 0.01
MO <0.03 0.03
NA 5.6 0.07
NI 5.4 0.07
P <0.5 0.5
PB 5.2 0.2
SB <0.2 0.2
SE 25.7 0.2
SN <0.2 0.2
SR 0.578 0.002
TI <0.01 0.01
TL <0.3 0.3
V <0.02 0.02
ZN 5.23 0.01
-------
Environmental Trace Substances Research Center
ICP Scan - Sample Analysis Report
project: ENTROPY Units: MCG/ML
Batch #: B-90080874
Customer ID: 74
Description: HIGH AUDIT
ETSRC ID: 0080932
Estimated Sample
Elm
AG
AL
AS
BA
BE
BI
CA
CD
CO
CR
cu
FE
K
LI
MG
MN
MO
NA
NI
P
PB
SB
SE
SN
SR
TI
TL
V
ZN
Result Detection Limit
<0.05 0.05
49.7 0.1
98.9 0.2
5.18 0.002
5.10 0.005
<0.2 0.2
4.9 0.2
50.5 0.03
48.2 0.05
49.1 0.05
50.2 0.01
51.1 0.03
262. 1.
<0.01 0.01
49.7 0.2
49.0 0.01
<0.03 0.03
52.3 0.07
51.5 0.07
<1. 1.
49.0 0.2
<0.2 0.2
245. 0.3
<0.2 0.2
5.58 0.002
<0.01 °-01
<0.3 0.3
<0.03 O-O3
48.9 °-03
-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
: Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711
°«0^ __ , ,, ,,-,
MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Emission Test Request for National Institute of Standards and
Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland
FROM: James U. Crowder, Chief
Industrial Studies Branen, ESO (MD-13)
TO: Gilbert H. Wood, Chief
Emission Measurement Branch, TSD (MO-14)
This is to request that the Emission Measurement Branch conduct
emission tests at the National Institute of Standards and Technology
located in Gaithersburg, Maryland. Emission tests are to be conducted on
one cooling tower that supp'Mes comfort cooling and cooling for laboratory
processes (lasers, ovens, etc.). Emission tests are needed to supplement
the data on performance of high-efficiency drift eliminators.
Detailed information on the facility to be tested and a discussion of
the emission measurements required are presented in the attached source
test request prepared by Midwest Research Institute (MRI). Questions
regarding this test request should be directed to Ms. Beth Teague or
Ms. Carol Athey of MRI.
Attachment
cc: Debbie Stackhouse, SDB
Beth Teague, ISB
Al Vervaert, ISB
Carol Athey, MRI
-------
MIDWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE
Suite 350
401 Harrison Oaks Boulevard
Gary, North Carolina 27513
Telephone (919) 467-521 5
FAX (919) 467-8060
Date: September 18, 1989
Subject: Recommendation for Emission Testing at National Institute of
Standards and Technology (NIST) in Gaithersburg, Maryland
Chromium Emissions from Cooling Towers NESHAP
EPA Contract No. 68-02-3817; ESO Project 85/02b
MR I Project 7716-K
From: Carol Athey
To: Beth Teague
ESO/ISB (MD-13)
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
Research Triangle Park, N.C. 27711
I. Recommendation
1. Conduct outlet testing of the comfort cooling tower located at
Building 302 to determine drift rate based on emissions of native
materials (to be determined prior to testing).
2. During the tests, obtain data on airflow, recirculating
waterflow, inlet and outlet water temperatures, blowdown, and makeup
waterflow rates. Also, obtain data on ambient wet bulb and dry bulb
temperatures, ambient humidity, ambient concentrations of materials
selected for measurement to determine drift rate, wind speed, and wind
direction.
3. Prior to and during the tests, obtain grab samples of the
cooling tower basin water for analysis to determine the concentrations of
native minerals.
II. Basis of Selection
The cooling tower at this facility was selected for testing for the
following reasons:
1. The cooling tower is equipped with Munters 0-15 high-efficiency
drift eliminators (HEDE's).
2. The cooling tower is located such that the test personnel will
have good access to the outlet stacks. The stack design will permit
unobstructed sampling traverses.
III.. Relationship of Test Data to Development of Performance Standards
These test data-are needed to supplement the data on the performance
of HEDE's; drift rate will be determined as a percentage of recirculating
waterflow.
-------
IV. Description of the Cooling Tower
The NIST is a Federal government research facility near
Gaithersburg, Maryland. Comfort cooling and cooling for laboratory
processes (lasers, ovens, etc.) are both provided by a 4-cell Marley tower
located near the western boundary of the facility. The tower was
installed in the early 1960's.
A sketch of the cooling tower system is provided in Figure 1. The
tower is a crossflow design with redwood splash fill and one fan per
cell. Propeller fans measuring 22 feet (ft) in diameter are located in
the stack of each cell. In 1985, the tower was retrofitted with high-
efficiency Hunters D-15 drift eliminators.
The capacity of the water basin is about 500,000 gallons (gal).
Four pumps, each rated for 8,800 gallons per minute, circulate the water
to the chillers. The water from the chillers is combined and returned to
the tower through a 42-inch riser pipe. Above the tower, the flow is
split into four branches and distributed to each of the cells. The water
distribution decks are located directly above the fill and are equipped
with gravity-flow nozzles. In winter, heated water is sprayed up into the
rear of the tower to prevent icing conditions.
A phosphate-based water treatment program is used to inhibit
corrosion in the heat exchangers. The tower currently is operating at six
cycles of concentration. Conductivity and pH are monitored continuously,
and blowdown occurs automatically when the conductivity reaches 1,800 to
2,000 umhos. Blowdown averages about 60,000 gallons per day (gal/day) in
summer and about 2,000 gal/day in winter.
Makeup water is provided by the City of Gaithersburg. The
conductivity is generally about 300 umhos, but after heavy rains and after
salt has been applied to the roads in the winter, the conductivity
increases. Makeup requirements in summer average about 300,000 gal/day,
and in winter average about 55,000 gal/day. Most of the water has first
been used for once-through cooling of oil and air compressors.
Biological growth is controlled by manually adding 6.5 gal of a
solution containing disodium cyanodithiodocarbonate (7.35 percent) or
potassium methyldithiocarbonate (10.15 percent) once a week.
V. Test Methodologies
The test methodologies that are used by EMB should accurately
characterize the drift rate based on emissions of native materials
contained in the recirculating water. Additionally, accurate
determinations of recirculating waterflow rate in the riser pipe and
determinations of inlet or ambient concentrations of the native materials
used to determine drift rate should be made. Onsite meteorological data
that will be needed include amb.ient.wet bulb and dry bulb temperatures,
ambient humidity, wind speed, and wind direction. The general guidelines
-------
HOT WATER SPRAY TO BASE OF TOWER (WINTER USE)
RECIRCULATING
WATER TO
DISTRIBUTION
DECK
BLOW-
DOWN
COOLED WATER
FROM TOWER
BASIN TO CHILLERS
FAN STACK
DISTRIBUTION
DECK
MAKEUP WATER BASIN
t (CITY WATER)
PUMP
Figure 1. Cooling tower at NIST facility in Gaithersburg, Maryland.
-------
for Cooling Tower Institute thermal efficiency and drift testing should be
adhered to when possible (see attached).
Representatives of Midwest Research Institute (MRI) will monitor the
cooling tower operating parameters to ensure that the testing conditions
are appropriate. These operating parameters include inlet and outlet
water temperatures, blowdown rates, makeup water flowrates, fan amperage,
and physical condition of the fan cells.
VI. Coordination
Coordination will be needed among the EMB project officer, the ISB
project officer, the testing contractor, and MRI to ensure that the test-
ing is performed under the proper conditions. No coordination with other
EPA offices is anticipated. In-house EPA test personnel should be used to
the maximum extent possible in conducting this test to conserve resources.
The contact at NIST is Mr. Alan Federline at (301) 975-6956.
Attachment
1602-21/CTS
-------
SOURCE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS SCHLOULLa
biimp 1 ing
I'oint
1 igure
Hi ser
cells 1-4
Basin
loldl
HO. Ot
Samples
Sdinp le
Type
Or i ( t
rate
Grab
Samp 1 i ng
Method
Company Name: National Institute
Standards and lochnology
Industry: Industrial cooling
lower
Sample
Col lecled
By "
Mi M Itnum
Samp line]
T ime
ol
._, ...
Company Location: Gai thersburg , Maryland
Prpcess: Comfort cooling Control Equipment:
Mini mum
Gci'-> Vol ume
Sampled It3
Initial Anal ysl b
Type Method By"
Final Analysis
Type Method By"
Slmulaneous Sampling Required
""CIK = Contractor, tPA = tnvironmenlal Protection Agency
alhe sampling methodologies to be used will be
selected by EMB.
REMARKS
1. Sampling shall be performed with +101 isokinetic conditions.
2. Methods are EPA unless Indicated otherwise.
3. Implngers and analysis of Implnger catch will be per the Federal Register, Volume 36.
No. 159, Part II, Tuesday, Aug. 17, 1971, unless specifically changed by the Project
Of f icer.
4. Sampling time and gas volumes are for each sample.
-------
rtttacninent
yj-i '.^ -Tr"1"^.
C T I
pnpy
COOLING TOWER INSTIT"1*4*** uun
IT IS GOOD BUSINESS TO CONSERVE WATER
March 24, 1986
M3. Pamela Csik Bellin
Midwest Researcn institute
Suite 202
4504 Creedmoor Road
Raleigh, NC 2"512
Dear Ms. Sell in:
As a follow-up co our discussions during the January
Cooling Tower Institute meeting and in subsequent telephone
conversations, I an pleased to provide, on behalf of the
C7I, our recommendations for acceptaole limits on test
conditions for the cooling to war arift measurements that
will be perforaea in the near future by the Environmental
Protection Agency. These recommenced guidelines, relating
to tower operating parameters and ambient environmental
conditions, include the following:
1. Ambient Wind Speed: Ideally the average ambient
wind speed during tne drift measurement should be
less than 5 f 5 miles per hour, .'-tore
realistically the average wind speed, measured in
an open and unobstructed location within 100 feet
upwind of the tower at a point 5 feet above basin
euro elevation should not exceed 10 miles per hour.
Wind gusts snould not exceed 15 miles per hour and
snouid not exceed 1 minute auraticn.
2. Heat Load: Drift -.easurevents may oe taken with or
wit."cut neat l:aa :n 3 mecnanical iraft cooling
tower).
3. Ambient Temperature =r.d '-'^midity: Drift
measurements .iay cs taxen at any non-freezing
ambient temperature/humility condition.
Conditions: Variations in
average amoient air temperatures snouid not excee-J
the following .i.r.its -uring the irift measurement
perioa:
*** Wet-bulb temperature - 2°~ per hour
*** Dry-bulb temperature - 5°F per hour
*ater Flow: The iri.it measurements should be taken
at nornai :perating water flow conditions, i.e.,
iesign flow -» 1C5.
- .. .
' 3) "1=0- '??"
i
-------
lis. -Pamela Csik Bell in
Midwest Researcn Institute
Page Two
5. Water Quality: Drift measurements should not be taken during
temporary upset conditions in water chemistry, i.e., the cycles of
concentration for the circulating water at the tine of the drift
measurement should be within a reasonaole proximity of normal levels.
Tracer Element Selection: The tracer element used should be unique
to any of the ancient airborne minerals in the environment. The test
procedure should provide for analysis of the ambient air to ensure
this.
Should you require additional information regarding these test
limitations, let me know and I will provide it. The Cooling Tower Institute
is certainly interested in the EPA's activities regarding measurement of
cnromiuni emissions and drift measurement technology, and we are prepared to
support this effort any way that we can.
Very truly yours.
' \ " x
-John W. Cooper, Jr., P.E.
Chairman, CTI Drift Measurement
Sub-committee
JWC/.mnk
:c: ;.F. Erunn
'.. \uharic
-------
^ito sr^^
1 A \ UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
} Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711
*
MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Emission Test Request for Allied Fibers, Inc., Moncure, North
Carolina
FROM: James U. Crowder, Chief
Industrial Studies Branch, ESD (MD-13)
TO: Gilbert H. Wood, Chief
Emission Measurement Branch, TSD (MD-14)
This is to request that the Emission Measurement Branch conduct
emission tests at the Allied Fibers plant located in Moncure, North
Carolina. Emissions tests are to be conducted on two industrial process
cooling towers. Emission tests are needed to supplement the data on
performance of high-efficiency drift eliminators.
Detailed information on the facility to be tested and a discussion of
the emission measurements required are presented in the attached source
test request prepared by Midwest Research Institute (MRI). Questions
regarding this test request should be directed to Ms. Beth Teague or
Ms. Carol Athey of MRI.
Attachment
cc: Debbie Stackhouse, SOB
Beth Teague, ISB
Al Vervaert, ISB
Carol Athey, MRI
1603-13/CTS
-------
MIDWEST HfcaicAHcn into 111 u .
Suite 35
401 Harrison Oaks Bouleva
Gary. North Carolina 275
Telephone (919) 467-52
FAX (919) 467-80-
Date: September 14, 1989
Subject: Recommendation for Emission Testing at Allied Fibers
Incorporated in Moncure, North Carolina
Chromium Emissions from Cooling Towers NESHAP
EPA Contract No. 68-02-3817; ESD Project 85/02b
MRI Project 7716-K
From: Carol Athey
To: Ronald Myers
ESD/ISB (MD-13)
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
Research Triangle Park, N.C. 27711
I. Recommendation
1. Conduct outlet testing of the Marley industrial process cooling
towers (TW-2 and TW-3) to determine drift rate based on emissions of
native materials (to be determined prior to testing).
2. During the tests, obtain data on airflow, recirculating
waterflow, inlet and outlet water temperatures, blowdown, and makeup
waterflow rates. Also, obtain data on ambient wet bulb and dry bulb
temperatures, ambient humidity, ambient concentrations of materials
selected for measurement to determine drift rate, wind speed, and wind
direction.
3. Prior to and during the tests, obtain grab samples of the
cooling tower basin water for analysis to determine the concentrations of
native minerals.
II. Basis of Selection
The cooling towers at this facility were selected for testing for
the following reasons:
1. The cooling towers are Marley towers equipped with Marley
XCEL-15 high-efficiency drift eliminators (HEDE's).
2. The cooling towers are located such that the test personnel will
have good access to the outlet stacks. All the stacks are at the same
elevation with no major obstructions.
3. The cooling towers operate continuously, 24 hours per day.
365 days per year.
4. The facility is located proximate to Research Triangle Park,
which eliminates the need for a large expenditure of travel funds for the
test crew.
-------
2
III. Relationship of Test Data to Development of Performance Standards
These test data are needed to supplement the data on the performance
of HEDE's; drift rate will be determined as a percentage of recirculating
waterflow.
IV. Description of the Cooling Tower
Allied Fibers operates two, identical Marley ICT's associated with
the polymer production process. Both towers are crossflow with splash
fill. One tower was originally installed in 1973; the second tower was
installed in 1975. Both towers were rebuilt in 1988; at that time, Marley
XCEL-15 drift eliminators were installed. Access ports for measuring
recirculation rate have not been installed on the riser pipes.
Recirculating water enters the towers at approximately 104°F and is cooled
to about 93°F in the summer (70°F to about 56°F in winter). Specific
tower information is presented below.
Dimensions of tower (wxl), ft 23x40
Overall tower height, ft 12.9
Height of fan stack, ft 3.8
Airflow capacity of each fan, acfm -185x10
No. of fan cells per tower 2
Dimensions of cells (wxl), ft 23x20
Recirculating waterflow rate, gal/min -3,500 (total, both towers)
No corrosion protection chemicals are used in these towers. The
towers and associated heat exchangers are cleaned and checked for
corrosion approximately every 2 years. Plant personnel report that no
corrosion problems have ever been found. A Nalco water treatment program
is used for biocide, antifoam, dispersant, and pH control. The pH is
maintained between 6 and 7. The total solids content of the recirculating
water is 0.86 percent (8,600 ppm). Because the recirculating cooling
water is used for direct cooling of the manufacturing process, the solids
may include ethylene glycol and short-chain polymers of polyester.
During a plant visit in August 1989, the fire extinguisher system
inside one of the towers was observed to be leaking. Plant personnel
indicated that the repairs to this tower would probably be scheduled
during October or November 1989.
V. Test Methodologies
The test methodologies that are used by EMB should accurately
characterize the drift rate based on emissions of native materials
contained in the recirculating water. Additionally, accurate
determinations of recirculating waterflow rate in the riser pipes and
determinations of inlet or ambient concentrations of the native materials
used to determine drift rate should be made. Onsite meteorological data
that will be needed include ambient wet bulb and dry bulb temperatures,
ambient humidity, wind speed, and wind-direction. The general guidelines
for Cooling Tower Institute thermal efficiency and drift testing should be
adhered to when possible (see attached).
-------
3
Representatives of Midwest Research Institute (MRI) will monitor the
cooling tower operating parameters to ensure that the testing conditions
are appropriate. These operating parameters include inlet and outlet
water temperatures, blowdown rates, makeup water flowrates, fan amperage,
and physical condition of the fan cells,
VI. Coordination
Coordination will be needed among the EMB project officer, the ISB
project officer, the testing contractor, and MRI to ensure that the test-
ing is performed under the proper conditions. No coordination with other
EPA offices is anticipated. In-house EPA test personnel should be used to
the maximum extent possible in conducting this test to conserve resources.
The contact at Allied Fibers is Mr. Bill Boyer at (919) 542-2200.
Attachment
1602-14/CTS
-------
SOURCE S AMR ING AND ANAIYSIS SCtlEOUlE3
Sampl Ing
Point
F Igure
Riser
eel Is 1-4
Basin
Total
No. of
Samples
Sample
Type
Drl ft
rale
Grab
Sampl Ing
Method
Contract No. .
Company Name: Allied Fibers, Inc.
Industry: Industrial cooling
tower
Sample
Col lected
By
Minimum
Sampl Ing
T Ime
Minimum
jas Volume.,
Sampled ft'
Assignment Number:
Company location: Moncure, North Carolina
Process: Polymer production
I
Control Equipment:
Initial Analysis
Type Method
By'
i
Final Analysis
Type "' Meffiod " By"
1
REMARKS
Slmulaneous Sampling Required I.
"C1R * Contractor,, EPA = Environmental Protection Agency 2.
dlhe sampling methodologies to be used will be 3.
selected by EMB.
4.
Sampling shall be performed with +101 Isoklnetlc conditions.
Methods are EPA unless Indicated otherwise.
Implngers and analysis of Implnger catch will be per the Federal Register, Volume 36.
No. 159, Part II, Tuesday. Aug. 17, 1971, unless spec I Heal Iy changed by the Project
Off leer.
Sampling time and gas volumes are for each sample.
-------
«-: it\ .ft I T^
PfiPY
COOLING TOWER INSTIT"1"-
IT IS GOOD BUSINESS TO CONSERVE WATER
March 24, 1986
Ms. Pamela Csik Bellin
Midwest Research Institute
Suite 202
U50U Creedmoor Road
Raleigh, NC 27612
Dear Ma. Bell in:
As a follow-up to our discussions during the January
Cooling Tower Institute meeting and in subsequent telephone
conversations, I am pleased to provide, on behalf of the
CTI, our recoranendations for acceptable limits on test
conditions for the cooling tower drift measurements that
will be performed in the near future by the Environmental
Protection Agency. These recommended guidelines, relating
to tower operating parameters and ambient environmental
conditions, include the following:
1. Ambient Wind Speed; Ideally the average ambient
wind speed during the drift measurement should be
less than 5 to 6 miles per hour. More
realistically the average wind speed, measured in
an open and unobstructed location within 100 feet
upwind of the tower at a point 5 feet above basin
curb elevation should not exceed 10 miles per hour.
Wind gusts should not exceed 15 miles per hour and
should not exceed 1 minute duration.
2. Heat Load: Drift -".easurements may be taken with or
without heat load (on a -necnanical draft cooling
tower).
3. Ambient Temperature and Humidity: Drift
measurements may be taKen at any non-freezing
ambient temperature/humidity condition.
U. Stability of Test Conditions: Variations in
average ambient air temperatures should not exceed
the following limits during the drift measurement
period:
*** Wet-bulb temperature - 2°F per hour
*** Dry-bulb temperature - 5°F per hour
5. Water Flow: The drift measurements should be taken
at normal operating waterflow conditions, i.e.,
design flow _+ 105.
- > « c...
388-1713) 250-1995
-------
;i3. rameia UJIK
Midwest Research Institute
Page Two
5. Water Quality; Drift measurements should not be taken during
temporary upset conditions in water chemistry, i.e., the cycles of
concentration for the circulating water at the time of the drift
measurement should be within a reasonable proximity of normal levels.
7. Tracer Element Selection: The tracer element used should be unique
to any of the ambient airborne minerals in the environment. The test
procedure should provide for analysis of the ambient air to ensure
this.
Should you require additional information regarding these test
Limitations, let me know and I will provide it. The Cooling Tower Institute
is certainly interested in the EPA's activities regarding measurement of
chromium emissions and drift measurement technology, and we are prepared to
support this effort any way that we can.
Very truly yours.
~\ , "
-John W. Cooper, Jr., P.E.
Chairman, CTI Drift Measurement
Sub-committee
JWC/mmk
cc: A.F. Brunn
I. Kuharic
-------
MRI
COOLING TOWER DRIFT TEST PROCEEDURES
FOR TOTAL MASS EMISSIONS
USING MODIFIED EPA METHOD 13A
FOR ISOKINETIC SAMPLING
MIDWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE 425 Volker Boulevard, Kansas City, MO 64110-2299 (816) 753-7600
-------
SECTION 1
INTRODUCTION
The independent cooling tower testing services of Midwest
Research Institute (MRI) are available to conduct drift tests on
cool ing towers.
Cooling tower drift is defined as the percent of water flow
through the tower which exits through the fan in the form of water
droplets and aerosols. The amount of drift from the tower is
determined by isokinetically sampling a representative fraction of the
tower airflow and measuring the amount of droplets and aerosol leaving
the stack. The drift sampling proceedures used by MRI are in
accordance with a modified EPA method ISA for isokinetic sampling of
emissions.
After sample collection, analytical laboratory techniques are then used
to measure the concentration of a number of selected trace constituents
present in the basin water and water collected from the airflow exiting
the fan stack. The trace constituents may be the metals already
present in the cooling tower water or from intentionally added
materials. Inductively coupled argon plasma spectroscopy (ICP), an
extremely sensitive detection technique, is usually used by MRI in
tests currently being performed. Other analytical techniques such as
flame atomic adsorption (FLAA), graphite furnace atonic adsorption
(GFAA), and neutron activation analysis (NNA) may be used if
appropriate for the concentration of the trace elements analyzed.
By comparing the measurements of the selected trace constituents in the
isokinetic sampling train and the same trace constituents in the basin
water, the drift rate can be calculated.
-------
SECTION 2
DRIFT TEST EQUIPMENT
A typical drift sampling system is shown in Figure 1.
Since drift is defined as the amount of droplets or aerosols
exiting the fan stack, the drift tests must be made at the top of
the fan stack. Also the proximity of the sample locations to the
fan required that the station locations be adjusted for the hub
effect. Sample locations are determined for 10-point radial
traverses using the equation for equal annular areas for fan
discharge from Chapter 5 of the CTI Manual. Figure 2 shows
typical sampling locations. The major equipment components then
used to collect the drift samples are described below.
AIR PITOT/DRIFT PROBE:
S ince cycl onic flow can bias the drift results,
adjustments in the sampling technique must be used to eliminate
this bias. A special MRI air pitot-drift probe assembly was
developed to allow unbiased sampling. If the sample nozzle is not
aligned with the flow, then effective velocity through the nozzle
opening is reduced by the cosine of the angle between the flow
and stack axis. This results in a sample which is not truly
isokinetic and thus the alignment approach 1- must be used for the
drift test to eliminate this bias. Since the sample
proportionality could be compromised with the alignment approach,
proportional sampling needs are then satisfied by adjusting the
nominal base sample time by the cosine of the cyclonic flow
angle. Airflow, fan discharge temperature and the angle of
cyclonic flow were measured with this probe assembly. The air
pitot-drift probe assembly was equipped with:
1. S-type primary pitot tips which are connected to a manometer
to measure air velocity.
2. Secondary pitot tips which are positioned at 90 degrees from
the primary pitot tips. The secondary set of pitot tips are
connected to a separate manometer to align the probe and
compensate for any cyclonic flow effects.
3. A temperature sensor connected to a digital readout to
measure the stack temperature.
IPeeler, J.W., F.J. Phoenix, and O.J. Grove,
"Characterization of Cyclonic Flow and Analysis of Particulate
Sampling Approaches at Asphalt Plant," Entropy Environmentalists,
Inc.
3
-------
Temperature
Sensor
Stainless Steel
Probe Nozzle
Pilot Tubes
Cyclonic Flow
Manometer
Air Velocity-
Manometer
Protractor
-to Determine
Angle
Filter Holder
Silica Gel
Impingers
Ice Bath
Vacuum
Line
By-Pass Valve
Vacuum
Gauge
Main Valve
Dry Gas Meter Air -T'9ht
Pump
uniiiniiii
1I
Field Computer
Console
Figure 1. Typical draft collection train.
-------
Figure 2 - Sampling Points were Located in the Center of Each of the Equal
Area Zones. Numbers 1 to 10 indicate the distances from the
fans inside wall to the respective sampling points.
-------
4. A protractor was attached to the probe assembly to determine
the angle that the probe was rotated during the cyclonic
flow determination.
5. A stainless steel sample nozzle and flexible teflon sample
probe which are connected to the drift collection train.
DRIFT COLLECTION TRAIN:
TFe dri ft col lection train which is shown in Figure 1,
consists of four high capacity impingers and a filter assembly.
Impingers 1 and 2 contained distilled water and were used to
scrub out the aerosols and water droplets. The third impinger is
used to collect any water droplets that might be carried over
from the previous impingers. The filter was used as the final
collection media and was placed between impinger 3 which was dry
and impinger 4 which contained silica gel. The sampling train
was kept iced during testing to help reduce the water vapor
pressure and to further improve collection efficiency.
CONTROL CONSOLE AND PUMP:
The control console and pump used was a High Volume Sampling
System (HVSS) consistent with EPA Method 13A requirements. The
impinger train is connected to the console via a sample line thru
the leak free vacuum pump capable of up to 4 cfm. The modular
vacuum pump has two control valves to adjust and maintain the
desired sampling rate. The console contains a calibrated dry gas
meter, digital temperature readout, manometers and associated
controls.
-------
SECTION 3
SAMPLING SEQUENCE
The test sequence for a typical drift test is as follows:
1. Water flow and fan horsepower measurements are conducted and
the tower operations monitored.
2. Drift sample and airflow measurement locations are
calculated.
3. A basin water sample is collected.
4. Isokinetic drift sampling of the selected fan stack is
conducted.
5. A second basin water sample is collected during the middle
of the drift test.
6. Isokinetic drift sampling of the fan is completed.
7. A third basin sample is collected at the conclusion of the
test. The three basin samples are composited into 1 basin
water sample.
8. The drift samples are recovered from the sample collection
system.
9. The basin composite, water blank and drift impinger samples
are acid stabilized and transported to the laboratory for
analysis.
-------
SECTION 4
DRIFT TEST METHODS
The tower operational test data are acquired in accordance
with applicable portions of the CTI ATC-105 (1982) or ASME PTC-23
(1986) test code. The drift sampling data are acquired in
accardance with applicable portions of EPA Method 13A. The
individual parameters are measured as follows:
* Total circulating water flow is measured with two 10-
or 20-point pitot traverse of the hot water return
lines or risers to the tower. A standard or reinforced
Simplex-Leopold type pitot tube, is used to measure the
velocity at each point. An air-over-water manometer is
used for measuring the differential pressure between
the impact and reference orifices of the pitot tube.
* Fan motor power is measured with a clamp on digital
kilowatt meter, using the two watt meter method.
* Air velocity is measured with four 10-point radial
traverses of the fan stack using the predetermined
sampling locations. At each point the MRI air pi tot-
drift probe assembly is rotated until the pressure
difference across the secondary pitot tips is zero.
When this zero differential has been obtained the
primary probe has been aligned with the flow and the
protractor read to determine the cyclonic flow angle.
The probe assembly is then used to measure the velocity
pressure and temperature at the sample point.
* The isokinetic sample rate and proportional sample
duration are determined using an Epson HX-20 computer.
The previously determined velocity pressure, stack
temperature and cyclonic flow angle are used by a
computer program to calculate the required sample
volume, isokinetic rate and the adjusted base sample
time.
* Sampling at each traverse location is commenced after
the proper sample rate is determined by turning on the
sample pump and simultaneously activating the variable
timer function of the HX-20 computer. When each sample
time had ended the pump is shut off, the air pi tot-
probe assembly is relocated to the next sample
location, and the above procedure repeated until all 40
points had been sampled.
-------
The drift sample recovery is initialed by using
distilled deionized water to rinse the stainless steel
nozzle and flexible teflon probe into the contents of
the first impinger. The impinger train is sealed and
then removed from the cooling tower to sample recovery
location where the remainder of the sample recovery is
performed. The impinger volumes and rinse volumes are
measured and recorded. The impinger contents along
with all rinse are transferred to sample bottles. A
distilled deionized water blank is taken. Both the
drift impinger samples and water blank are nitric acid
stabilized and then returned to MRI for further
analysis.
Basin water samples are taken at the beginning the
midpoint and the conclusion of the drift sample. The
basin water sample is usually taken from a thermal well
that is installed on the discharge side of the
circulating water flow pump. The samples are collected
after the thermal well line is purged. The three
samples are collected and then combined into one
composite basin water sample. The composite basin
sample is stabilized with nitric in the same manner as
are the impinger and water blank samples.- The
composite basin water sample is returned to MRI for
further analysis.
-------
SECTION 5
SAMPLE ANALYSIS
The samples are returned to MRI where custody of the samples
is transferred to the analytical section. Quantative analysis of
selected trace elements in both the tower basin water samples and
the collected drift samples is then performed by the analytical
section. A Jarrell-Ash Model 1155A ICP-AES instrument is usually
used to analyze the samples by inductively coupled argon plasma
spectroscopy (ICP). The flame or furnace atomic absorption
spectroscopy (FLAA and GFAA, respectively) may also be used to
analyze for seme elements such as chromium on a Perkin-Elmer
Model 5000 Zeeman Atomic Absorption Spectrophometer. Several
methods can be used to prepare the drift and basin water samples
for the analysis using depending on the analysis method to be
used and the tracers to be analyzed. The preparation and
analysis methods which may be used are described below.
ACIDIFICATION AND DILUTION :
This is tne simplist procedure used to prepare surface
and ground water samples for analysis by flame atomic absorption
spectroscopy (FLAA) or by inductively coupled argon plasma
spectroscopy (ICP).
The entire sample is acidified at the time of collection with
nitric acid. At the time of analysis the sample is diluted if
necessary and acidified with nitric to obtain approximately a
nitric acid sample matrix which is then ready for analysis.
METHOD 3005
Method 3005 is an acid digestion procedure used to
prepare surface and ground water samples for analysis by flame
atonic absorption spectroscopy (FLAA) or by inductively coupled
argon plasma spectroscopy (ICP).
For total recoverable metals the entire sample is acidified at
the time of collection with nitric acid. At the time of analysis
the sample is heated with acid and substantially reduced in
volume. The digestate is filtered and diluted to volume, and is
then ready for analysis.
For dissolved metals the sample is filtered through a 0.5 urn
filter at the time of collection and the liquid phase is then
acidified at the time of collection with nitric acid. At the
time of analysis the sample is heated with acid and substantially
reduced in volume. The digestate is filtered (if necessary) and
diluted to volume, and is then ready for analysis.
10
-------
METHOD 3010:
Method 3010 is a digestion procedure that is used for
the preparation of aqueous samples, EP and mobility-procedure
extracts, and wastes that contain suspended solids for analysis,
by flame atomic absorption spectroscopy (FLAA) or oy inductively
coupled argon plasma spectroscopy (ICP).
A mixture of nitric acid and the material to be analyzed is
refluxed in a covered Griffin beaker. This step is repeated with
additional portions of nitric acid until the digestate is light
in color or until its color has stabilized. After the digestate
has been brought to a low volume, it is refluxed with
hydrochloric acid and brought up to volume
METHOD 3050:
Method 3050 is an acid digestion procedure used to
prepare sediments, sludges, and soil samples for analysis by
flame or furnace atonic absorption spectroscopy (FLAA and GFAA,
respectively) or by inductively coupled argon plasma spectroscopy
(ICP).
A representative sample is digested in nitric acid and hydrogen
peroxide. The digestate is then refluxed with either nitric acid
or hydrochloric acid. Dilute hydrochloric acid is used as the
final reflux acid for (1) the ICP analysis of As and Se, and (2)
the flame AA or ICP analysis of Al, Ba, Ca, Cd, Cr, Co, Cu, Fe,
Mo, Pb, Ni, K, Na, Tl, V, and Zn. Dilute nitric acid is employed
as the final dilution acid for the furnace AA analysis of As, Be,
Cd, Cr, Co, Pb, Mo, Se, Tl, and V.
METHOD 6Q1Q:
Method 6010 describes the procedures for inductively
coupled argon plasma spectroscopy (ICP) in determining elements
including metals in solution. This method is applicable to a
large number of metals and wastes. All matrices, including
ground water, aqueous samples, EP extracts, industrial wastes,
soils, sludges, sediments and other solid wastes, require
digestion prior to analysis.
ICP is then used for the simultaneous, or sequential,
mu 1 tielemental determination of elements by measuring the
element-emitted light with optical spectrometry. Samples are
nebulized and the resulting emission spectra are produced by a
radi o-f re que ncy inductively coupled plasma. The spectra are
dispersed by a grating spectrometer, and the intensities of the
lines are monitored by photomu Iti pi i er tubes. Background
correction is required for trace element determination.
11
-------
METHOD 7QOQ:
Method 7000 is used for the determination of metals in
drinking, surface and saline waters and domestic and industrial
wastes by Atomic Absorption. While drinking water free of
particulate matter may be analyzed directly, ground-water, other
aqueous samples, EP extracts, industrial wastes, soils, sludges,
sediments, and other solid wastes require digestion prior to
analysis by Atomic Absorption using the furnace technique.
In direct-aspiration atomic absorption spectroscopy, a sample is
aspirated and atomized in a flame. A light beam from a hollow
cathode lamp or an electrodeless discharge lamp is directed
through the flame into a monochromator, and onto a detector that
measures the amount of absorbed light. Absorption depends upon
the presence of free unexcited ground-state atcms in the flame.
Because the wavelength of the light beam is characteristic of
only the metal being determined, the light energy absorbed by the
flame is a measure of the concentration of that metal in the
sample. This principle is the basis of atonic absorption.
When using the furnace technique in conjunction with an atomic
absorption spectrophotometer, a representative aliquot of the
sample is placed in the graphite tube in the furnace, evaporated
to dryness, charred, and atomized. As a greater percentage of
available analyte atoms is vaporized and dissociated for
absorption in the tube rather than the flame, the used of smaller
sample volumes or detection of lower concentrations of elements
is possible. The principle is essentially the same as with
direct aspiration atomic absorption, except that a furnace,
rather than a flame is- used to atomize the sample.
NEUTRON ACTIVATION ANALYSIS
Neutron activation analysis (NAA) is a highly selective
and sensitive analytical method capable of measuring trace
amounts of many elements. NAA is performed by first irradiating
a sample with neutrons to produce radioactive isotopes of the
stable elements present in the sample, then selectively measuring
the activated products using techniques such as gamma-ray
spectroscopy or specific radiochemical separation proceedures.
NAA may be applied to relatively small samples of solids or
liquids since it is independent of the chemical form of the
elements and requires a minimum of pre-analysis preparation or
chemistry, thus minimizing reagent or laboratory contamination.
Although MRI doesnot perform NAA, this analysis can be subtracted
if needed for a specific test.
12
-------
SECTION 6
RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS
The following equation is used by the MRI drift
computer program to calculate the drift results:
% Drift = 100 * ( NFA * NWT ) / ( NZA * WFR * EQT * BTC )
NFA = Net Fan Area (square feet)
NWT = Net Weight of Tracer (meg)
NZA = Nozzle Area (square feet)
WFR = Waterflow Rate (grams per minute)
EQT = Equivalent Sample Time (minutes)
BTC = Basin Tracer Concentration (mcg/g)
If several tracers are sufficiently concentrated for
analysis the results are presented in tabular format for
comparison. If any site conditions are observed which may
influence the results they are noted in the report which is
prepared to document the drift results.
13
-------
"-
,'j"
'' '' . Environmental Trace Substances Research Center
ICP Scan - Sample Analysis Report
Project: Marley Cooling Tower Co. Units: MCG/ML
Batch |I B-89020001
Customer ID: 4A
Description: AQUEOUS SOLUTION
ETSRC ID: 9020005
Estimated Sample
Detection Limit
0.01
0.02
0.04
0.01
0.0007
0.0007
;" 0.04
0.06
0.003
.' . 0.01
0.01
0.002
0.01
0.4
0.01
0.001
0.0009
.... 0.003
: 0.01
; ; v r 0.03
/ 0.01
1 . . o.i
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.01
0.04
: / . : 0.0005
,<: - . : v 0.002
i.-.V.y.vVs^ 0.06. *
\ i^";, -i-:;^1:--'.!' 0.002 '
. i '-/' ' "'- 0.002
Elm
AG
AL
AS
B
BA
BE
BI
CA
CD
CO.
CR
CU
kl FE
K
W .
Lr
. MG
MM
MO
. NAl
NI .
" P
PB
SB
SB
SI
SN
r/S;
^ v?.
2M
l
.-
I
I,
I
I
».'.
1
<
: :
»
i
r.
f
!!
-
i:
t
:
:
*
:
[.
J:j
t
Result
<0.01
0.03
<0.04
<0.01
<0.0007
<0.0007
<0.04
0.21
0.016 '
<0.01 ''
0.01 '
0.017 .,
0.25
0.6
<0.01
0.190
0.047 ,
0.012 ;
<0.01 :
0.21
o.oa ;
<0.1 ''. *-"
0.09
X0.04
<0.04
0.03
<0.04
0.0008 ,
<0 . 002.
<0 . 06 ""''
<0.002^
0.065 '
'
^
-------
Environmental Trace Subatancaa Research Center
TCP Scan - Sample Analysis Report:
Projecti Marlay Cooling Tow«r Co. Units: MCG/ML
Batch I: B-89020001
Customer ID: 4B
Description: AQUEOUS SOLUTION
ET3RC ID: 9020038
: Elm s
, AC :
. AL J
AS :
: ' B «
. ;'.A .« ' BA i
"-' '* ?; - BE t
' 'i .. ' .
.';V:-.-: ,--;:: Bl t
:''." :''''' V CA »
. . " :...: - - CD
" ' .' :;/.- co
'.'' :-:'Y^rV; CR
- . ' v-., ':.-: oj
' ': '. PE
j- ; V - f ; ... K
'. v'- >."'.' W
'';.-1-lir""j;-'v-"-;t-i'' LI
'.-;;?. A: v i-;;'.-'.- MG'
v;";- vi: v'i--i-<^\- MH-
i-;/'-i;"-----^3-,!.Mo
/;^->: -'Y' 3:";'-'.' HA
' ' " ''. ' . MT
~ > - ; N X
:- ' .; !:;-, : P
-. -' i ' ':, -i PB
SB
-..'- ; <' . 3E
:-- .':'.-.. 'Y;-'-'1 SI
;;v':"'-:.'V.:.:7^.-^ SM
^v.'j:>?*'. «..-,'/'%-. SR.
V i * » ^^ **' ^V^.'* ****"
^^'fi-^^^'^TI
':.?,>'? ^-(^*^.-'. " Tt
' "'' 1 I'-V.*'1 &:., , V
" "*--' ~- ' ' ^ ' *m
? .>.--\- '. .'" *«
Result
<1.
<2.
<4.
2.
0.2
<0.07
<4.
300.
<0.3
'2
J ; . I 7. ^ ," » » '
' r ' ' " :- .v^ '" '
; - ..^ ' *
Estimated Sample
Detection Limit
1.
2.
4.
1.
0.07
0.07
4.
5.
0.3
1.
1.
0.2
1.
40.
1.
0.1
. 0.09
0.3
; 1.
"> ' .-' V 2.
1 .
10.
4.
4.
4.
1.
. ,-'4.
: ' -, '/:' 0.05 '
''--.' -< 0.2 . -
:-.:..--.; 6^ ; '
;'"' 0.2
' 0.2
-------
Environmental Trace Substances Research Center
ICP Scan - Sample Analysis Report
Project: MARLEY COOLING TOWER CO. Units: MCG/ML
Batch I: B-89020156
Customer ID: 4C
Description: AQUEOUS SOLUTION
ETSRC ID: 9020160
Estimated Sample
Detection Limit
0.01
0.02
0.04
0.01
0.0005
0.0005
0.04
0.09
0.003
0.005
0.008
0.002
0.005
0.3
0.02
0.002
0.0006
0.002
0.006
0.02
0.01
0.1
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.01
0.04
0.0006
0.005
_, O.OB
0.003
0.003
Elm
AS
AL
AS
B
BA
BE
BI
CA
CD
CO
CR
CU
FE
K
W
LI
MG
MM
HO
HA
NX
P
PB
SB
SB
SI
SN
SR
TT
TL
V
ZN
e
;
i
s
o
»
9
I
I
S
:
:
j
i
:
:
:
*
:
t
t
t
t
:
i
t
t
Result
<0
0.
<0
<0
0.
<0
<0
0.
<0
<0
<0
0.
0.
<0
<0
<0
0.
<0
<0
0.
<0
<0
<0
<0
<0
0.
<0
0.
<0
<0
<0
0.
.01
05
.04
.01
001
.0005
.04
2
.003
.005
.008
026
064
.3
.02
.002
030
.002
.006
12
.01
.1
.04
.04
.04
02
.04
001
.003
.OS
.003
22
u
-------
Saiple Volute
Uater Blank Voluie
376 Rinse Volute 151
401 Initial Uater Vol. 250
Filter Saiple Volute 50
2nd Rinse Voluie 207
DESCRIPTION
Basin Uater dcg/g)
(ipinger dcg/g)
I>pg 2nd Rns dcg/g)
Filter dcg/g)
Uater Blank dcg/g)
Filter Blank dcg)
CALCULATED VALUES
Iipinger Catch dcg)
Iipg 2nd Catch dcg)
Filter dcg)
Uater Blank dcg)
Filter Blank dcg)
Net Saiple dcg)
B
2.0
NA
NA
NA
0.0000
0.0009
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
BA
.2
NA
.0010
NA
0.0000
0.0000
.00
.21
.00
.00
.00
.21
CA
300.0
.2100
.2000
NA
0.0000
0.0000
78.96
41.40
.00
.00
.00
120.36
CU
NA
.0170
.0260
NA
0.0000
0.0000
6.39
5.39
.00
.00
.00
11.77
K
100.0
.6000
NA
Ul
Fifl
0.0000
0.0000
225.60
.00
.00
.00
.00
225.60
LI
1550.0
.1300
NA
.0300
0.0000
0.0000
71.44
.00
1.50
.00
.00
72.94
HG
282.0
.0470
.0300
NA
0.0000
0.0000
--
17.67
6.21
.00
.00
.00
23.88
NA
1130.0
.2100
.1200
NA
0.0000
0.0000
78.96
24.84
.00
.00
.00
103.80
SI
37.0
.0300
.0200
NA
0.0000
0.0000
11.28
4.14
.00
.00
.00
15.42
SR
3.2
.0008
.0010
NA
0.0000
0.0000
.30
.21
.00
.00
.00
.51
-------
DRIFT TEST RESULTS
TRACER
AHALY7ED
E:A
CA
K
LI
NG
NA
5 [
SR
EiAS flJ
CGNr.
( iiir<) 'j )
0 ., 2
3OO , ")
] OO ., (")
155O. O
282. 0
1 130 .0
37 0
-T ^
TRACER
NET WT.
(me
0.
1 2O .
** ~nrr
.- .. ^_) a
72.
O~T
] O3 .
15.
0.
3>
21
36
60
94
88
80
42
51
DRIFT
RATE
ml /
126.,
43.
272.
5.
10.
11.
50.
17.
ini n
71
42
25
68
*"? O
09
29
O~T
DRIFT
/. OF
0.
0.
0 .
0.
0.
0.
o.
0.
GPM
Ol 108
O0423
O2 380
O0050
00089
<~:O097
1 j ( 'i /] 4 Q
00168
DRIFT
/. OF
DRV AIR
0.
0.
O .
n
0.
0.
0.
0.
O1289
O0493
02769
ODD 58
00104
00 1 1 3
00512
00196
-------
TRACER
ANALYZED
DA
CA
CD
FE
LI
Mb
MM
MO
MA
P
E3R
ZN
D
CR
DAS IN
CONC .
(. ntc q / q .'
0. 1
563. 0
2 . O
0 . 4
0 . 3
112.0
0 . 0
0 . O
733. 0
0 . 7
4.8
1. 6
1 . 2
0 . 0
-- UKil-
TRAC
NET
(me
1 .
5926.
16.
12.
f- ' a
1191.
1 .
O.
7849.
14.
48.
38.
1.
2.
I 1 1
ER
WT.
g:>
24
62
38
39
96
38
23
74
25
80
83
25
19
76
=.ti 1 KtiDUL 1 t)
DRIFT
RATE
ml /mi n
24195.66
21567.70
16696.40
61914. 52
23970.45
21794. 02
7.126002.79
32258. 1 1
21939. 63
45257.64
2O973.62
47785. 11
2031.75
7.188491 .98
DRIFT
0.
0.
O.
0.
O .
O.
o.
o.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
7. OF
GFM
06 4 OB
057 1 2
O4422
16398
06349
05772
33372
OB544
0581 1
11987
05555
12656
00538
49923
DRIFT
DR
0.
O.
0.
O.
0.
0.
0.
O.
0.
0.
0.
0 .
0.
0.
7. OF
:Y AIR
1 1403
1 0 1 64
07869
29179
11297
10271
59382
15203
1034O
21329
09884
22520
00958
88832
-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711
MEMORANDUM JAN 2 5 1390
SUBJECT: Emission Tests For Development Of Cooling Tower Emission Factors
FROM: £. L. Martinez, Chief
Criteria Emissions Section,
THRU: William F. Hunt, Jr.
Chief, Monitoring and Reports Bran
TO: Gilbert Wood, Chief
Emission Measurement Branch
This is to request that the Emission Measurement Branch conduct
additional measurements to those already planned at the 2 cooling towers
scheduled for testing during 1990 for development of particulate emission
factors. I am also requesting that a third cooling tower be tested,
arrangements and funds permitting.
We are requesting the following testing:
1) cooling tower water flow rate, at least one per tower
2) particulate measurement (preferably PMjg), at least one per tower
3) total suspended and total dissolved solids
4) drift measurement expressed as a percent of the tower water
circulation rate
5) a listing of the physical and operating parameters of the cooTing
towers
6) a copy of any water chemistry analysis you may be planning to do.
After testing is completed and the results analyzed, please provide a
copy of the test report to Dennis Shipman of our staff. We plan to turn the
test results over to an MRB contractor to develop the emission factors for
this source category.
If there are any questions, please direct thera to Dennis Shipman at
x5477.
cc: D. Bivins
E. McCarley
D. Shipman
-------
APPENDIX D
QA/QC DATA
-------
METER BOX CALIBRATION DATA AND CALCULATION FORM
(English Units)
Date
6/14/90
Barometric
Pressure 29.56 in. Hg
Meter Box # RAC-1
Calibrated bv: 77//
Orifice
Manometer
Setting
(DelH)
in. H2O
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
3.0
4.0
Gas Volume
Wet test
meter
(Vm)
ft~3
5
5
10
10
10
10
Dry Gas
meter
(Vd)
ft ^3
4.976
5.020
10.035
10.079
10.119
10.160
Tern]
Wet test
meter
(tw)
degF
79.5
80.0
78.0
77.0
78.0
78.0
Gamma of Ref Meter
1.0164
DelH
in.
H20
0.5
1.0
1.5
10
3.0
4.0
DelH/
13.6
0.0368
0.0737
0.1103
0.1471
0.2206
0.2941
Yi = Gs
Vd'{Pb
1.0290
1.0337
1.0302
1.0410
1.0517
1.0545
Dry Gas Meter
Inlet Outlet
Avg
(td)
degF
84.3
92.8
89.3
97.1
107.5
1118
Time
decimal
mm
1122
8.70
14.98
13.12
10.40
9.05
Yi
1.0290
1.0337
1.0302
1.0410
1.0517
1.0545
DelH
in. H2O
1.712
1.713
1.903 :
1.910 ;
1.775
1.775 i
Average
1.0400
1.798
Del Hi = {.0317*Del H/Pb'(td + 460)}'
{(tw+460)*time/ Vw}~2
1.7119
1.7128
1.9031
1.9100
1.7748
1.7755
.02Y = 0.0208
Yi upper limit 1.0608
Yi lower limit 1.0192
VarfordelH 0.150
Del H upper limit 1.948
DelH lower limit 1.648
-------
METHOD 5 METERBOX CALIBRATION WORKSHEET
Meter Box #
RAC-L
Vac
DelH
Date
Pbar
Init
4.0
0.5
6/14/90
29156
Standard (Ref) Meter Box
Volume Temp
Finish 772.300 Start 79.0
Start 767.300 Finish SO.O
Diff 5.000 Average 79.5
Meter Box (to calibrate)
Volume Temp
Finish 673.337 Start Sl.O
Start 668.411 Finish S7.5
Diff 4.976 Average 34.3
Run-Time min.scc
1113
Run-Time decimal
12.22
Vac
DelH
Date
Pbar
4.0
1.0
6/14/90
29.56
Standard
Volume
Finish
Start
Diff
(Ref) Meter
778.300
773.300
5.000
Run-Time min.sec
Box
Temp
Start
Finish
Average
8.42
80.0
30.0
80.0
Meter Box (to calibrate)
Volume Temp
Finish 679.410 Start
Start 674.390 Finish
Diff 5.020 Average
Run-Time decimal
8.70
37.5
98.0
918
'Vac
;DelH
;Date
JFbar
link
4.0
1.5
6/14/90
29.56
Standard (Ref) Meter Box
Volume Temp
Finish 791.300 Start 73.0
Start 781.300 Finish 78.0
Diff 10.000 Average 78.0
Meter Box (to calibrate)
Volume Temp
Finish 691450 Start S15
Start 681415 Finish 96.0
Diff 10.035 Average S9.3
Run-Time min.sec
14.59
Run-Time decimal
14.98
Vac
DelH
Date
Pbar
Init
4.0
10
6/14/90
29.56
~7"7^
Standard
Volume
Finish
Start
Diff
(Ref) Meter
801.800
791.800
10.000
Run-Time min.sec
Box
Temp
Start
Finish
Average
13.07
77.0
77.0
77.0
Meter Box
Volume
Finish
Start
Diff
(to calibrate)
703.034
691955
10.079
Run-Time decimal
Temp
Start
Finish
Average
13.12
39.3
105.0
97.1
1
Vac
DelH
Date
Pbar
Init
6/14/90
4.0
3.0
.56
Standard (Ref) Meter Box
Volume Temp
Finish 811800 Start 78.0
Start 802.800 Finish 78.0
Diff 10.000 Average 78.0
Meter Box (to calibrate)
Volume Temp
Finish 714.162 Start 105.0
Start 704.043 Finish 110.0
Diff 10.119 Average 107.5
Run-Time min.scc
10.24
Run-Time decimal
10.40
Vac
DelH
Date
Pbar
Init
4.0
4.0
6/14/90
29,56
-ny
Standard
Volume
Finish
Start
Diff
Run-Time
(Ref) Meter
323.400
313.400
10.000
min.sec
Box
Temp
Start
Finish
Average
9.03
73.0
73.0
73.0
Meter Box
Volume
Finish
Start
Diff
(to calibrate)
Temp
724.942 Start
714.732 Finish
10.160 Average
Run-Time decimal
9.05
107.5
118.0
1113
-------
METER BOX CALIBRATION DATA AND CALCULATION FORM
(English Units)
Date
7/19/90
Meter Box #
Barometric Calibrated by:
Pressure 29.73 in. Hg
RAC-1
Orifice
Manometer
Setting
(Del H)
in. H2O
0.5
1.0
1.5
10
3.0
4.0
Gas Volume
Wet test
meter
(Vm)
5
5
10
10.1
10
10
Dry Gas
meter
(Vd)
ft ^3
0.000
4.900
9.983
10.009
10.017
10.088
Tern]
Wet test
meter
(tw)
degF
0.0
76.0
76.0
76.0
76.0
76.0
Gamma of Ref Meter
Dry Gas Meter
Inlet Outlet Avg
(td)
degF
0.0
88.3
98.0
106.3
111.5
1115
0.9948
Time
DelH
in.
H20
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
3.0
4.0
DelH/
13.6
0.0368
0.0737
0.1103
0.1471
0.2206
0.2941
Yi = Ga
Vd*{Pb
1.0357
1.0336
1.0553
1.0511
1.0430
H/13.6)}*(tw
decimal
min
0.00
8.47
14.97
13.10
10.37
9.07
Yi
1.0357
1.0336
1.0553
1.0511
1.0430
D«1H
in. H2O
1.619
1.864
1.839
1.746
1.778
Average
1.0437
1.769 i
Del Hi = {.0317'Del H/Pb'(td + 4/50)}'
{(tw +460)*time /(Gamma* Vw)}~2
1.6189
1.8639
1.8393
1.7462
1.7779
.02Y = 0.0209
Yi upper limit 1.0646
Yi lower limit 1.022S
VarfordelH 0.150
Del H upper limit 1.919
Del H lower limit 1.619
-------
METHOD 5 METERBOX CALIBRATION WORKSHEET
Meter Box #
RAC-L
Vac
DelH
Date
Pbar
|Init
0.5
7/19/90
29.73
Standard (Rcf) Meter Box
Volume Temp
Finish Start
Start Finish
Diff 0.000 Average
0.0
Run-Time mm.sec
Meter Box (to calibrate)
Volume Temp
Finish Start
Start Finish
Diff 0.000 Average
Run-Time decimal
0.00
0.0
Vac 4.0
Del H 1.0
Date 7/19/90
P bar 29.73
Init r~T~n
Standard (Ref) Meter Box
Volume Temp
Finish 428,400 Start
Start 423.400 Finish
Diff 5.000 Average
Run-Time minjec
8.28
76.0
76.0
76.0
Meter Box (to calibrate)
Volume Temp
Finish 976.844 Start
Start 971.944 Finish
Diff 4.900 Average
Run-Time decimal
8.47
82.5
94.0
88.3
|Vac 4.0
|De!H 1.5
Date 7/19/90
IP bar 29.73
Standard (Ref) Meter Box
Volume Temp
Finish 449.500 Start
Start 439.500 Finish
Diff 10.000 Average
Run-Time min.sec 14.58
76.0
76.0
76.0
Meter Box (to calibrate)
Volume Temp
Finish 997.759 Start 94.0
Start 987.776 Finish 102.0
Diff 9.983 Average 98.0
Run-Time decimal
14.97
Vac
DelH
Date
Pbar
Init
4.0
2.0
7/19/90
29.73
~T?3
Standard (Rcf) Meter Box
Volume Temp
Finish 460.300 Start
Start 450.200 Finish
Diff 10.100 Average
Run-Time min.jcc 13.06
76.0
76,0
76.0
Meter Box (to calibrate)
Volume
Finish 1008.357
Start 998.348
Diff 10.009
Run-Time decimal
Temp
Start
Finish
Average
13.10
105.5
107.0
106.3
Vac
DelH
Date
Pbar
Init
4.0
3.0
7/19/90
29.73
-rrjT
Standard
Volume
Finish
Start
Diff
Run-Time
(Ref) Meter
506.000
496.000
10.000
min.sec
Box
Temp
Start
Finish
Average
10.22
76.0
76.0
76.0
Meter Box ( to calibrate )
Volume
Finish
Start
Diff
Run-Time decimal
54.003
43.986
10.017
Temp
Start
Finish
Average
10.37
112.0
111.0
111.5
Vac
DelH
Date
Pbar
ilnit
4.0
4.0
7/19/90
£9.73
Standard (Ref) Meter Box
Volume Temp
Finish 532.200 Start 76.0
Start 522.200 Finish 76.0
Diff 10.000 Average 76.0
Meter Box (to calibrate)
Volume Temp
Finish 80.270 Start 111.0
Start 70.182 Finish 114.0
Diff 10.088 Average 112.5
Run-Time min.iec
9.04
Run-Time decimal
9.07
-------
METER BOX CALIBRATION DATA AND CALCULATION FORM
(English Units)
Date
5/27/90
Meter Box #
RAC-3
Barometric Calibrated by:
Pressure 29.63 in. Hg
Gas Volume
Orifice
Manometer
Setting
(Del H)
in. H2O
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
3.0
4.0
Wet test
meter
(Vm)
ft~3
5
5
10
10
10
10
Dry Gas
meter
(Vd)
ft ^3
4.663
4.605
9.367
9.426
9.286
9.123
Wet test
meter
(tw)
degF
74.5
75.0
75.0
75.5
76.0
76.0
Gamma of Ref Meter
Temperatures
Dry Gas Meter
Inlet Outlet Avg
(td)
degF
94.5
98.5
103.5
108.3
113.0
112,5
1.0045
Del H
in.
H20
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
3.0
4.0
DelH/
13.6
0.0368
0.0737
0.1103
0.1471
0.2206
0.2941
Yi = Gs
Vd*{Pb
1.1160
1.1357
1.1253
1.1253
1.1479
1.1645
Vd*{Pb + (Del H/13.6)}*(tw+460)
Time
decimal
min
11.67
8.47
13.95
12.18
9.88
8.55
Yi
1.1160
1.1357
1.1253
1.1253
1.1479
1.1645
DelH
in. H20
1.487
1.558
1.572
1.588
1.558
1.556
Average
1.1358 |
1.553
Del Hi = {.0317*Del H/Pb*(td + 46Q)}*
{(tw+460)*time /(Gamma* Vw)> - 2
1.4871
1.5581
1.5721
1.5884
1.5579
1.5559
.02Y = 0.0227
Yi upper limit 1.1585
Yi lower limit 1.1131
VarfordelH 0.150
DelH upper limit 1.703
Del H lower limit 1.403
-------
METHOD 5 METERBOX CALIBRATION WORKSHEET
Meter Box #
RAC-3
Vac
DelH
Date
Pbar
Init
4.0
0.5
5/27/90
29.63
|Vac
DelH
Date
Pbar
Init
4.0
1.0
5/27/90
29.63
Vac
;DelH
Date
Pbar
Init
4.0
1.5
5/27/90
29.63
IVac
DelH
Date
Pbar
Inic
4.0
2.0
5/27/90
29.63
Standard
Volume
Finish
Start
Diff
(Ref) Meter
27.500
22.500
5.000
Run-Time min.sec
Box
Temp
Start
Finish
Average
11.40
74.0
75.0
74.5
Meter Box
Volume
Finish
Start
Diff
(to calibrate)
Temp
326.995 Start
322.332 Finish
4.663 Average
Run-Time decimal
11.67
93.0
96.0
94.5
Standard
Volume
Finish
Start
Diff
(Ref) Meter
33.100
28.100
5.000
Run-Time min.sec
Standard
Volume
Finish
Start
Diff
(Ref) Meter
43.700
33.700
10.000
Run-Time min.sec
Standard
Volume
Finish
Start
Diff
(Ref) Meter
65.100
55.100
10.000
Run-Time min.sec
jVac
JDelH
Date
Pbar
Init
4.0
3.0
5/27/90
29.63
Vac
iDelH
Date
Pbar
jink
4.0
4.0
5/27/90
29.63
Standard
Volume
Finish
Start
Diff
(Ref) Meter
96.600
86.600
10.000
Run-Time min.sec
Standard
Volume
Finish
Start
Diff
(Ref) Meter
107.000
97.500
9.500
Run-Time min.sec
Box
Temp
Start
Finish
Average
8.28
Box
Temp
Start
Finish
Average
13.57
Box
Temp
Start
Finish
Average
12.11
Box
Temp
Start
Finish
Average
9.53
Box
Temp
Start
Finish
Average
8.33
75.0
75.0
75.0
Meter Box
Volume
Finish
Start
Diff
(to calibrate)
Temp
332.043 Start
327.438 Finish
4.605 Average
Run-Time decimal
75.0
75.0
75.0
8.47
Meter Box (to calibrate)
Volume Temp
Finish 341.965 Start
Start 332.598 Finish
Diff 9.367 Average
Run-Time decimal
75.0
76.0
75.5
Meter Box
Volume
Finish
Start
Diff
13.95
(to calibrate)
Temp
361.887 Start
352.461 Finish
9.426 Averaee
Run-Time decimal
76.0
76.0
76.0
Meter Box
Volume
Finish
Start
Diff
12.18
(to calibrate)
Temp
391.042 Start
381.756 Finish
9.256 Average
Run-Time decimal
76.0
76.0
76.0
Meter Box
Volume
Finish
Start
Diff
9.88
(to calibrate)
Temp
401.095 Start
391.972 Finish
9.123 Average
Run-Time decimal
8.55
96.0
101.0
98.5
101.0
106.0
103.5
107.5
109.0
108.3
113.0
113.0
113.0
113.0
1110
112.5
-------
METER BOX CALIBRATION DATA AND CALCULATION FORM
(English Units)
Date
Barometric
Pressure
7/20/90
29.62 in. Hg
Meter Box #
Calibrated bv:
rac-3
Gas Volume Tern]
Orifice
Manometer
Setting
(DelH1)
in. H2O
0.5
1.0
1.5
10
3.0
4.0
Wet test
meter
(Vm)
ft ^3
5
5.105
10
10.1
10
10
Dry Gas
meter
(Vd)
ft~3
4.532
4.663
9.161
9.271
9.162
9.091
Wet test
meter
(tw)
degF
75.0
75.0
75.0
75.0
76.0
77.0
Gamma of Ref Meter
Dry Gas Meter
Inlet Outlet Avg
(td)
degF
80.5
93.0
1015
104.0
107.0
110.5
0.9948
DelH
in.
H20
0.5
1.0
1.5
10
3.0
4.0
DelH/
13.6
0.0368
0.0737
0.1103
0.1471
0.2206
0.2941
Yi = G:
Vd'{Pb
1.1074
1.1229
1.1375
1.1369
1.1401
1.1511
Yi = Gamma* Vw*Pb«(td + 460) /
Vd'{Pb+(Dci HA3.6)}'(tw+46Q)
Time
decimal
min
11.72
a65
13.98
1130
9.85
8.50
Yi
1.1074
1.1229
1.1375
1.1369
1.1401
1.1511
DelH
in. H2O
1.572
1.607
1.614
1.62S
1.595
1.580
Average
1.1327
1.599
Del Hi = {.0317*Dcl H/Pb*(td + 460)}'
{(tw+460)'timc /(Gamma' Vw)>/N2
1.5724
1.6070
1.6140
1.6279
1.5949
1.5798
.02Y = 0.0227
Yi upper limit 1.1553
Yi lower limit 1.1100
VarfordelH 0.150
DelH upper limit 1.749
Del H lower limit 1.449
-------
METHOD 5 METERBOX CALIBRATION WORKSHEET
Meter Box #
rac-3
Vac
DelH
Date
Pbar
Init
4.0
0.5
7/20/90
29.62
Vac
DeiH
Date
Pbar
4.0
1.0
7,20/90
29.62
Standard (Rcf) Meter Box
Volume Temp
Finish 605.000 Start
Start 600.000 Finish
Diff 5.000 Average
Run-Time mm.scc 11.43
75.0
75.0
75.0
Meter Box (to calibrate)
Volume Temp
Finish 495.477 Start
Start 490.945 Finish
Diff 4.532 Average
Run-Time decimal
11.72
76.0
85.0
80.5
Standard (Ref) Meter Box
Volume Temp
Finish 611.705 Start
Start 606.600 Finish
Diff 5.105 Average
Run-Time min.sec 8J9
75.0
75.0
75.0
Meter Box (to calibrate)
Volume Temp
Finish 501.593 Start
Start 496.930 Finish
Diff 4.663 Average
Run-Time decimal
8.65
85.0
101.0
93.0
Vac 4.0
Del H 1.5
Date 7/20/90
,Pbar 29.62
:i.i« -nfi
Standard (Rcf) Meter Box
Volume Temp
Finish 621400 Start
Start 612.400 Finish
Diff 10.000 Average
Run-Time mm.sec 13.59
75.0
75.0
75.0
Meter Box (to calibrate)
Volume Temp
Finish 511.3S4 Start 101.0
Start 501223 Finish 104.0
Diff 9.161 Average 1015
Run-Time decimal
13.98
IVac
DeiH
:Date
Pbar
'init
4.0
10
7,20/90
29.62
Vac
DelH
pate
'Pbar
4.0
3.0
7^ZO/90
29.62
Standard (Ref) Meter Box
Volume Temp
Finish 633.200 Start
Start 623.100 Finish
Diff 10.100 Average
Run-Time min.scc 1118
75.0
75.0
75.0
Meter Box (to calibrate)
Volume Temp
Finish 521.293 Start
Start 511022 Finish
Diff 9.271 Average
Run-Time decimal
1130
104.0
104.0
104.0
Standard (Ref) Meter Box
Volume Temp
Finish 644.000 Start
Start 634.000 Finish
Diff 10.000 Average
Run-Time min.sec 9.51
76.0
76.0
76.0
Meter Box (to calibrate )
Volume Temp
Finish 531.186 Start
Start 521024 Finish
Diff 9.162 Average
Run-Time decimal
9.85
104.0
110.0
107.0
Vac
,DeiH
Date
Pbar
Init
4.0
4.0
7/20/90
29.62
Standard (Ref) Meter Box
Volume Temp
Finish 655.000 Start
Start 645.000 Finish
Diff 10.000 Average
Run-Time min.sec 8.30
76,0
78.0
77.0
Meter Box (to calibrate)
Volume Temp
Finish 541.187 Start
Start 531096 Finish
Diff 9.091 Average
Run-Time decimal
8.50
110.0
111.0
110.5
-------
METER BOX CALIBRATION DATA AND CALCULATION FORM
(English Units)
Date
6/12/90
Meter Box #
EN-1
Barometric Calibrated by:
Pressure 29.72 in. Hg
Gas Volume Tern]
Orifice
Manometer
Setting
(Del H')
in. H2O
0.5
1.0
1.5
10
3.0
4.0
Wet test
meter
(Vm)
ff-3
5
5
10
10
10
10
Dry Gas
meter
(Vd)
ft ^3
5.308
5.410
11.054
11.057
11.119
11.137
Wet test
meter
(tw)
degF
75.0
75.5
76.0
76.0
77.0
77.0
Gamma of Ref Meter
Dry Gas Meter
Inlet Outlet
1.0164
DelH
in.
H20
0.5
1.0
1.5
10
3.0
4.0
DelH/
13.6
0.0368
0.0737
0.1103
0.1471
0.2206
0.2941
Yi = Gs
Vd'{Pb
0.9616
0.9607
0.95 28
0.9625
0.9598
0.9609
Yi = Gamma* Vw'Pb'(td + 460) /
el H/13.6)}'(tw-r460)
\vg
-td)
legF
78.0
89.0
97.5
104.0
108.0
111.0
Time
decimal
min
1192
9.37
15.20
13.20
10.90
9. -I?
Averace
Yi Del H
in.H20
0.9616
0.9607
0.9528
0.9625
0.9598
1.894
1.955
1.905
1.893 :
1.930
0.9609 I 1.931
0.9597 1 1.918
Del Hi = (.0317'Del H/Pb'(td + 460)}'
{(tw +460)'time/ Vw}~2
1.8935
1.9552
1.9049
1.S934
1.9301
1.9310
.02Y = 0.0192
Yi upper limit 0.9789
Yi lower limit 0.9405
VarforddH 0.150
Del H upper limit 1068
Del H lower limit 1.768
-------
METHOD 5 METERBOX CALIBRATION WORKSHEET
Meter Box #
EN-I
Vac 4.0
Del H 0.5
Date 6/12/90
P bar 29.72
Init T7^
Standard (Ref) Meter Box
Volume Temp
Finish 490.800 Start
Start 435.300 Finish
Diff 5.000 Average
Run-Time min.scc 12.55
75.0
75.0
75.0
Meter Box (to calibrate )
Volume Temp
Finish 658.861 Start
Start 653.553 Finish
Diff 5.303 Average
Run-Time decimal
12.92
73.0
33.0
73.0
Vac 4.0
Del H 1.0
Date 6/12/90
P bar 29.72
Init T7h
;Vac
Del H
Date
-------
METER BOX CALIBRATION DATA AND CALCULATION FORM
(English Units)
Date
Barometric
Pressure
7/19/90
29.73 in. Hg
Meter Box # EN-1
Calibrated bv: 77#
Gas Volume Tern]
Orifice
Manometer
Setting
(DelH)
in. H20
0.5
1.0
1.5
10
3.0
4.0
Wet test
meter
(Vm)
ft~3
5
5
10
10
10
10
Dry Gas
meter
(Vd)
ft ^3
0.000
5.521
11.154
11.235
11.255
11.242
Wet test
meter
(tw)
degF
0.0
73.5
74.0
74.5
75.0
75.0
Gamma of Ref Meter
Dry Gas Meter
Inlet Outlet Avg
(td)
dcgF
0.0
95.0
101.0
105.5
108.5
111.0
1.0164
DelH
in.
H20
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
3.0
4.0
DelH/
13.6
0.0368
0.0737
0.1103
0.1471
0.2206
0.2941
Yi = Ga
Vd*{Pb
0.9552
0.9538
0.9524
0.9525
0.9555
Yi = Gamma' Vw*Pb*(td + 460)/
cl H/13.6)}'(tw + 460)
Time
decimal
min
0.00
9.42
15.32
13.38
10.95
9.55
Yi
0.9552
0.9538
0.9524
0.9525
0.9555
DclH
in. H2O
1.877
1.846
1.868
1.869
1.887
Average
0.9539
1.870
Del Hi = {.0317'Del H/Pb*(td + 460)}'
{(tw +460)'time /(Gamma' Vw)}~2
1.8774
1.8462
1.8679
1.8692
1.8874
.02Y = 0.0191
Yi upper limit 0.9730
Yi lower limit 0.9348
VarfordelH 0.150
DclH upper limit 1020
Del H lower limit 1.720
-------
METHOD 5 METERBOX CALIBRATION WORKSHEET
Meter Box #
EN-L
Vac
DelH
Date
Pbar
Init
0.5
7/19/90
29.73
Vac
DelH
Date
Pbar
Init
4.0
1.0
7/19/90
29.73
T#?
Standard (Ref) Meter Box
Volume Temp
Finish Start
Start Finish
Diff 0.000 Average
Run-Time min.jcc
0.0
Meter Box (to calibrate)
Volume Temp
Finish Start
Start Finish
Diff 0.000 Average 0.0
Run-Time decimal
0.00
Standard (Ref) Meter Box
Volume Temp
Finish 713.600 Start
Start 708.600 Finish
Diff 5.000 Average
Run-Time mm.scc 9.25
73.0
74.0
73.5
Meter Box (to calibrate)
Volume Temp
Finish 64.556 Start 910
Start 59.035 Finish 98.0
Diff 5.521 Average 95.0
Run-Time decimal
9.42
iVac
:DelH
;Date
Pbar
jlnit
4.0
1.5
7/19/90
29.73
11f-
Standard
Volume
Finish
Start
Diff
Run-Time
(Ref) Meter
724.200
714.200
10.000
min.sec
Box
Temp
Start
Finish
Average
15.19
Meter Box (to calibrate)
74.0
74.0
74.0
Volume
Finish 76.384
Start 65.230
Diff 11.154
Run-Time decimal
Temp
Start
Finish
Average
15.32
98.0
104.0
101.0
Vac
DelH
Date
Pbar
Init
4.0
2.0
7/19/90
29.73
77#
Standard
Volume
Finish
Start
Diff
Run-Time
(Ref) Meter
734.500
724.500
10.000
min.sec
Box
Temp
Start
Finish
Average
13.23
74.0
75.0
74.5
Meter Box
Volume
Finish
Start
Diff
(to calibrate)
87.950
76,715
11.235
Run-Time decimal
Temp
Start
Finish
Average
13.38
104.0
107.0
105.5
Vac
DelH
Date
Pbar
Init
7/19/90
4.0
3.0
'.73
Standard (Ref) Meter Box
Volume Temp
Finish 744.900 Start 75.0
Start 734.900 Finish 75.0
Diff 10.000 Average 75.0
Meter Box (to calibrate)
Volume Temp
Finish 99.664 Start 107.0
Start 88.409 Finish 110.0
Diff 11.255 Average 108.5
Run-Time min.sec
10.57
Run-Time decimal
10.95
iVac
iDelH
[Date
iPbar
Init
4.0
4.0
7/19/90
29.73
~1~fU
Standard
Volume
Finish
Start
Diff
Run-Time
(Ref) Meter
755.800
745.800
10.000
min.sec
Box
Temp
Start
Finish
Average
9.33
75.0
75.0
75.0
Meter Box
Volume
Finish
Start
Diff
(to calibrate)
111.912
100.670
11.242
Run-Time decimal
Temp
Start
Finish
Average
9.55
110.0
112.0
111.0
-------
METER BOX CALIBRATION DATA AND CALCULATION FORM
(English Units)
Date
6/14/90
Meter Box #
Barometric Calibrated by:
Pressure 29.60 in. Hg
EN-2
Orifice
Manometer meter
Gas Volume
Wet test
Temperatures
Dry Gas Wettest Dry Gas Meter
meter meter Inlet Outlet Avg
Setting
(Dei H)
in. H2O
0.5
1.0
1.5
10
3.0
4.0
(Vm)
5
5
10
10
10
10
(Vd)
5.128
5.211
10.639
10.729
10.721
10.750
(tw)
degF
73.5
75.0
77.0
77.5
79.0
79.0
Gamma of Ref Meter
1.0164
Time
DclH
in.
H20
0.5
1.0
1.5
10
3.0
4.0
DelH/
13.6
0.0368
0.0737
0.1103
0.1471
0.2206
0.2941
Yi =Ga
Vd'{Pb
1.0056
1.0074
1.0050
1.0023
0.9995
0.9987
Yi = Gamma* Vw«Pb«(td+ 460) /
Vd'{Pb + (Del H/13.6)}'(tw+460)
-td)
degF
82,0
94.0
107.0
111.5
1115
115.0
decimal | Yi
min
13.13
9.50
15.50
13.62
11.00
9.62
Average
1.0056
1.0074
1.0050
DelH
in. H20
1.940
1.997
1.963
1.0023 i IOCS
0.9995
0.9987
1.973 '
1002
1.0031
1.980
Del Hi = {.0317'Dcl H/Pb'(td + 460)}'
{(tw+460)*timc/
1.9401
1.9974
1.9629
10076
1.9728
10016
.02Y = 0.0201
Yi upper limit 1.0231
Yi lower limit 0.9830
VarfordelH 0.150
Del H upper limit 1130
Del H lower limit 1.830
-------
METHOD 5 METERBOX CALIBRATION WORKSHEET
Meter Box #
EN-2
Vac
DelH
Date
Pbar
Init
4.0
0.5
6/14/90
29.60
f~m
Standard
Volume
Finish
Start
Diff
Run-Time
(Ret) Meter
68S.700
683.700
5.000
mm.scc
Box
Temp
Start
Finish
Average
13.08
Meter Box
73.0
74.0
73.5
Volume
Finish
Start
Diff
(to calibrate)
366.935
361.807
5.128
Run-Time decimal
Temp
Start
Finish
Average
13.13
77.0
87.0
810
Standard (Ref) Meter Box
Volume Temp
Finish 697.000 Start 75.0
Start 691000 Finish 75.0
Diff 5.000 Average 75.0
Meter Box (to calibrate)
Volume Temp
Finish 375.566 Start 91.0
Start 370.355 Finish 97.0
Diff 5.211 Average 94.0
Run-Time min.jcc
9.30
Run-Time decimal
9.50
Vac
Del H
Date
Pbar
Init
4.0
1.5
6/14/90
29.60
T^
Standard (Ref) Meter Box
Volume Temp
Finish 721.000 Start
Start 711.000 Finish
Diff 10.000 Average
Run-Time mm.scc 15.30
Meter Box ( to calibrate)
77.0
77.0
77.0
Volume
Finish 401.008
Start 390.369
Diff 10.639
Run-Time decimal
Temp
Start
Finish
Average
15.50
105.0
109.0
107.0
Vac
DelH
Date
Pbar
Init
Vac
DelH
Date
Pbar
Init
4.0
10
6/14/90
29.60
~"n n
4.0
3.0
6/14/90
29.60
T /^
Vac
DelH
Date
Pbar
Init
4.0
4.0
6/14/90
29.60
"TTB I
Standard
Volume
Finish
Start
Diff
(Ref) Meter
744.800
734.800
10.000
Run-Time mm.scc
Standard
Volume
Finish
Start
Diff
(Ref) Meter
755.300
745.300
10.000
Run-Time mm.sec
Standard
Volume
Finish
Start
Diff
Run-Time
(Ref) Meter
765.900
755.900
10.000
mm.sec
Box
Temp
Start
Finish
Average
13.37
Box
Temp
Start
Finish
Average
11.00
Box
Temp
Start
Finish
Average
9.37
77.0
78.0
77.5
Meter Box
Volume
Finish
Start
Diff
(to calibrate)
426.485
415.756
10.729
Run-Time decimal
79.0
79.0
79.0
Meter Box
Volume
Finish
Start
Diff
Temp
Start
Finish
Average
13.62
1110
111.0
111.5
( to calibrate)
437.735
427.014
10.721
Run-Time decimal
79.0
79.0
79.0
Meter Box
Volume
Finish
Start
Diff
Temp
Start
Finish
Average
11.00
111.0 I
114.0
1115
I to calibrate!
449.130
438.380
10.750
Run-Time decimal
Temp
Start
Finish
Average
9.62
114.0
116.0
115.0
-------
METER BOX CALIBRATION DATA AND CALCULATION FORM
(English Units)
Date
7/19/90
Meter Box #
Barometric Calibrated by:
Pressure 29.73 in. Hg
EN-2
Orifice
Manometer meter
Setting (Vm)
(DelH1) ft ^3
in. H2O
0.5
1.0
1.5
10
3.0
4.0
Gas Volume Temperatures
Wettest Dry Gas Wettest Dry Gas Meter
meter meter Inlet Outlet Avg
(Vd) (tw) (td)
ft~3 degF deg F
5
5
10
10
10
10
5.225
5.278
10.700
10.822
10.891
11.092
75.0
75.5
76.5
77.0
77.0
77.0
Gamma of Ref Meter
0.9948
DelH
in.
H20
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
3.0
4.0
DelH/
13.6
0.0368
0.0737
0.1103
0.1471
0.2206
0.2941
Yi =Ga
Vd'{Pb
0.9632
0.9664
0.9643
0.9624
0.9607
0.9451
Vd'{Pb+(Del H/13.6)}'(tw + 460)
810
90.5
98.5
105.0
109.0
111.5
Time
decimal
min
13.02
9.27
15.55
13.55
11.02
9.47
Yi
0.9632
0.9664
0.9643
0.9624
0.9607
0.9451
DelH
in. H20
1.928
1.928
1014 :
1019 !
1.988
1.949
Average
0.9604
1.971 ;
Del Hi = {.0317«Del H/Pb'(td + 460)}«
{(tw +460)'time /(Gamma* Vw)}~2
1.9281
1.9278
10140
10193
1.9882
1.9489
.02Y =
Yi upper limit
Yi lower limit
VarfordelH
Dei H upper limit
Del H lower limit
0.0192
0.9796
0.9412
0.150
1121
1.821
-------
METHOD 5 METERBOX CALIBRATION WORKSHEET
Meter Box #
EN-2
Vac
DeiH
Date
Pbar
Init
4.0
0.5
7/19/90
29.73
TTf?
Standard
Volume
Finish
Start
Diff
(Rcf) Meter
261.000
256.000
5.000
Run-Time min.scc
Box
Temp
Start
Finish
Average
13.01
75.0
75.0
75.0
Meter Box (to calibrate)
Volume
Finish
Start
Diff
960.483
955.263
5.225
Run-Time decimal
Temp
Start
Finish
Average
13.02
77.0
37.0
32,0
Vac 4.0
Del H 1.0
Date 7/19/90
P bar 29.73
In,, Tl-ff
Vac 4.0
Del H 1.5
Date 7/19/90
P bar 29.73
init ~ra
Standard (Rcf) Meter Box
Volume Temp
Finish 266.700 Start
Start 261.700 Finish
Diff 5.000 Average
Run-Time min.sec 9.16
75.0
76.0
75.5
Meter Box (to calibrate)
Volume Temp
Finish 966.506 Start
Start 961.223 Finish
Diff 5.278 Average
Run-Time decimal
9.27
87.0
94.0
90.5
Standard (Ref) Meter Box
Volume Temp
Finish 277.100 Start
Start 267.100 Finish
Diff 10.000 Average
Run-Time min.scc 15.33
76.0
77.0
76.5
Meter Box ( to calibrate )
Volume Temp
Finish 977.634 Start
Start 966.934 Finish
Diff 10.700 Average
Run-Time decimal
15.55
94.0
103.0
98.5
Vac
DelH
Date
Pbar
Init
4.0
2.0
7 /1 9/90
29.73
~T7l3
Standard
Volume
Finish
Start
Diff
Run-Time
(Rcf) Meter
287.700
277.700
10.000
min.scc
Box
Temp
Start
Finish
Average
13.33
77.0
77.0
77.0
Meter Box
Volume
Finish
Start
Diff
(to calibrate)
989.121
978.299
10.822
Run-Time decimal
Temp
Start
Finish
Average
13.55
103.0
107.0
105.0
1
Vac
Del H
Date
P bar
Unit
4.0
3.0
7/19/90
.73
Standard (Ref) Meter Box
Volume Temp
Finish 298.200 Start 77.0
Start 2S8.20Q Finish 77.0
Diff 10.000 Average 77.0
Meter Box (to calibrate)
Volume Temp
Finish 1000.559 Start 107.0
Start 989.663 Finish 111.0
Diff 10.891 Average 109.0
Run-Time min.scc
11.01
Run-Time decimal
11.02
Vac
DelH
Date
Pbar
Init
4.0
4.0
7/19/90
25.73
TTP
Standard
Volume
Finish
Start
Diff
Run-Time
(Ref) Meter
309.100
299.100
10.000
min.sec
Box
Temp
Start
Finish
Average
9.23
77.0
77.0
77.0
Meter Box (to calibrate)
Volume
Finish
Start
Diff
Run-Time decimal
12.641
1.549
11.092
Temp
Start
Finish
Average
9.47
111.0
1110
111.5
-------
APPENDIX E
PROCESS DATA
-------
.'5
It oo
IbIS
/G>3o
/ (,
-------
V I iC
ll
7370.7
/V7. 3
2 g
9o 9 7.
//O. X
-------
H
/0,oo
10 Z 0
11,0 0
II,20
'3-ac y
[3,30;3
"f.
.i// S'.T
;*.
'*"
.oJ
u ^
-------
ft £ - o f c - D
M20_
/0;76
//,^O
/A/6"
// 3^
// ^;
/2-^0;
o
r?
a FF
or/^
o F F
cFF
^rF
73
! 7
7vooa i ?//?.?
-------
f.,- ..< -^-^G
o o
/£> 0 0
30
00
r//
71
r~
5
7V/7
775^
7J77
757T
?
/JJ7
J37S"
8\11
8 !
-------
9
9
/ 0
/
// 'a
n /r
112*
II. yr
71
f
S
1 v/2-
7f-
7321
. /
7^9
/,
V.
7V- 5"
6 A
- Sao$
?.c
6./S'/
^^75
^003
?y/2 ! 57. / 7
7^37 . S^'^
7Vva 5"7-7
"?377 T7.37
, sv. r-7
r, 0/5
0
7x7
7HI2..H tt-6-
lux.
r./
s
5, w
S.^.
c
^ I
5
S.£,
S
s
5. £,
S. E
^JL
76.//
77-0
7 7. ff
77. Cz
'1
79,
70. c
/ 75
CZ.i
\ 9/.93
. S7?
-------
- -/i
y- X*
0 «-
? /r
/O/atf
/o. /<
/^'^
/p /r
/^' '
/ ,'* °
a*
>/
o
y«?«?<7
^/9<3
$177
5/97
30
y/ ^5
S"/9a
* V 2
7ji , I
75. 3 7
. oa.
. /?
/7
. 7*5
£00 5"
5:0-75-
u/,
S
5
5
U/
5.
£ ,
^.d /^/?
79. //
%3. 3
/ o
Co ;
4?
-------
-12
n /
-------
APPENDIX F
TEST PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS
-------
SAMPLING PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS
Name
Organization
Respons ibili ty
Dan Bivins
Ron Myers
Bill Kirk
Barry Rudd
Matt Hamilton
Todd Brozell
Greg Blanschan
Sam McClintock
Bill DeWees
EPA, Emission Measurement Branch
EPA, Industrial Studies Branch
Entropy Environmentalists, Inc.
Entropy Environmentalists, Inc.
Entropy Environmentalists, Inc.
Entropy Environmentalists, Inc.
Entropy Environmentalists, Inc.
Entropy Environmentalists, Inc.
DEECO, Inc.
EPA Task Manager
EPA Task Coordinator
Project Coordinator
Sampling Team Leader
Sampling Technician
Sampling Technician
Sampling Technician
Train Recovery/Transport
Field Engineer
------- |