United States
Environment^ Protection
Agency
Office of Air Quality EMB Report 92-PAR-Q2
Planning and Standards Volume I
Research Triangle Park, NO £771 1 May 1893
Air
Particleboard Production Facility
Emission Test Report
Weyerhaeuser Company
Moncure, North Carolina
-------
EMISSION TEST REPORT
HAP EMISSION TESTING OF
SELECTED SOURCES AT A
PARTICLEBOARD PRODUCTION FACILITY
WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY
Moncure, North Carolina
Submitted to:
ETS International, Inc.
1401 Municipal Road, NW
Roanoke, VA 24012-1309
Prepared fon
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
Emission Measurement Branch, MD-19
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711
EMB Work Assignment Manager: Dennis Holzschuh
EMB Project Officer: JJE. McCarley
Prepared by:
ROY F. WESTON, INC
1000 Perimeter Park Drive, Suite E
Morrisvffle, NC 27560
Program Manager: James Seme, PJL
Test Director: Michael Kirkman
WESTON Work Order No. 10202-001-001-0000
May 10,1993
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION TITLE PAGE
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1-1
1.1 Background 1-1
1.2 Program Objectives 1-1
1.3 Key Personnel 1-2
1.4 Outline of Test Program 1-2
2.0 PROCESS DESCRIPTION AND OPERATION 2-1
2.1 Introduction 2-1
2.2 Process Description 2-1
2.2.1 Medium Density Fiberboard Mill 2-2
2.2.2 Microboard Mill 2-5
2.3 Description of Process Parameters Monitored During Testing 2-8
2.3.1 MDF Press 2-8
2.3.2 MDF Dryer B 2-9
2.3.3 Core & Surface Flake Dryers 2-9
2.3.4 Microboard Press 2-10
2.4 Summary of Process Rates 2-10
3.0 SUMMARY OF RESULTS 3-1
3.1 Presentation 3-1
3.2 Discussion ". ! 3-1
3.2.1 Aldehyde/Ketones 3-1
3.2.2 Particulate and Condensibles 3-5
3.2.3 PM1(? 3-5
3.2.4 Semivolatile Organics 3-8
3.2.5 Volatile Organics 3-8
3.2.6 CEM 3-12
5.2.7 Quuiiic Flow at the MDF Cyclone Sampling Location 3-15
4.0 SAMPLING LOCATIONS .4-1
4.1 General 4-1
*
4.2 Sampling Location Parameters 4-1
Sampling Locations Descriptions 4-1
4.3.1 MDF Cyclone Outlet 4-1
4.3.2 MDF Press Exhaust 4-4
4.3.2.1 Press Hood Stacks 4-4
4.3.2.2 Press Building Oven Roof Exhausts 4-4
4.3.2.3 Press Cooling End Exhaust Stack 4.4
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(Cont.)
SECTION TITLE PAGE
4.3.3 Microboard Core Layer and Surface Layer Particle Dryers 4-4
4.3.3.1 Core EFB Inlet • • • 4~n
4.3.3.2 Core EFB Outlet 4'n
4.3.3.3 Surface Inlet and Outlet - 4'n
4.3.4 Microboard Press Room and Cooling Area 4-11
5.0 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES 5-1
5.1 Overview of Flue Gas Sampling and Analysis Procedures 5-1
5.2 Sampling Points 5-1
5.3 Volumetric Flow Rates 5-1
5.3.1 Flue Gas Velocity 5-1
5.3.2 Flue Gas Composition 5-1
5.3.3 Flue Gas Moisture Content 5-2
5.4 Pollutant Emissions Determinations 5-2
• 5.4.1 Aldehydes/Ketones 5-2
5.4.2 Carbon Monoxide, Nitrogen Oxides and Total Hydrocarbons 5-7
5.4.3 Paniculate and Condensible Particulate 5-10
5.4.4 PM10 and Condensible Particulate 5-12
5.4.5 Semivolatiles 5-17
5.4.6 Volatile Organics * 5-29
6.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL 6-1
6.1 Presentation 6-1
6.2 Data Quality Objectives 6-1
6.3 QC for Sample Collection 6-2
6.3.1 Method 0011 - Aldehyde/Ketones 6-2
6.3.2 Continuous Emissions Monitoring 6-3
6.3.3 Method 5/202 - Particulate/Condensibles 6-4
6.3.4 Method 201A - PM10 6-4
6.3.5 Method 0010 - Semivolatiles . . . .... ..... .....'. 6-4
6.3.6 Methods 1-4 - Velocity/Volumetric Flow Rate QC Procedures .... 6-5
6.3.7 Method 0030 - VOST 6-5
6.4 QC Procedures for Analysis 6-6
6.4.1 Method 5/202 - Particulate/Condensibles 6-6
6.4.2 Method 201A - PM10 6-7
6.4.3 Method 0011 - Aldehyde/Ketones 6-7
6.4.4 Method 0010 - Semivolatiles 6-7
6.4.5 Method 0030 - VOST 6-10
6.4.6 Method 7E - Nitrogen Oxides, Method 10 - Carbon Monoxide and
Method 25A - Total Hydrocarbons Monitoring 6-11
ii
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(Cont.)
SECTION TITLE PAGE
6.5 QA/QC Checks for Reduction, Validating and Reporting 6-11
6.6 Corrective Actions 6-14
6.7 QA Audits 6-15
7.0 SUMMARY OF EMISSION FACTORS 7-1
in
-------
APPENDICES
NO. APPENDIX PAGE
A, Test Results
1. MDF Cyclone Outlet (DB) . 2
2. MDF Press Stack 2 (WTW-2) 22
3. MDF Press Stack 3 (WIW-1) 28
4. MDF Press Stack 4 (WTW-5) 34
5. MDF Press Stack 5 (WIW-3) 40
6. MDF Press Stack 6 (WIW-4) 46
7. Microboard Core EFB Inlet 52
8. Microboard Core EFB Outlet (1520) 57
9. Microboard Surface EFB Inlet 71
10. Microboard Surface EFB Outlet (1510) 76
11. Microboard Press Stack 11 (DEF-1) 90
12.- Microboard Press Stack 12 (DEF-3) ' 96
13. Microboard Press Stack 13 (DEF-5) 102
14. Microboard Cooling Room 14 (DEF-7) 108
15. Microboard Cooling Room 15 (DEF-8) 114
16. Continuous Emissions Monitoring Data
for All Locations 120
17. Example Calculations 126
B. Field and Analytical Data
1. MDF Cyclone Outlet (DB) 133
2. MDF Press Stack 2 (WIW-2) 215
3. MDF Press Stack 3 (WIW-1) 246
4. MDF Press Stack 4 (WIW-5) 277
5. MDF Press Stack 5 (WIW-3) 310
6. MDF Press Stack 6 (WIW-4) 341
7. Microboard Core EFB Inlet 374
8. Microboard Core EFB Outlet (1520) 399
9. Microboard Surface EFB Inlet . . 460
10. Microboard Surface EFB Outlet (1510) 484
11. Microboard Press Stack 11 (DEF-1) 551
12. Microboard Press Stack 12 (DEF-3) 587
13. Microboard Press Stack 13 (DEF-5) 623,
14. Microboard Cooling Room 14 (DEF-7) 659
15. Microboard Cooling Room 15 (DEF-8) 682
16. Continuous Emissions Monitoring Data
for All Locations 703
17. Laboratory Reports 779
IV
-------
APPENDICES (Cont.)
NO. APPENDIX PAGE
C. Sampling and Analytical Procedures
1. Method 5 963
2. Method 201A 982
3. Method 202 1017
4. Method 0011 1030
5. Method 0010 1089
6. Method 0030 1140
7. Method 7E 1157
8. Method 10 1159
9. Method 25A 1162
D. Calibration Data 1167
-------
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE TITLE
1-1 Test Log
2-1 Process Data for Testing at MDF Press Vents 1, 2 & 4 ..... 2-11
2-2 Process Data for Testing at MDF Press Vents 3 and 5 2-12
2-3 Process Data for Testing on MDF Dryer B Cyclone Outlet 2-13
2-4 Process Data for Testing at the Core Dryer Electrified Filter Bed (EFB)
Outlet
2-14
2-5 Process Data for Testing at the Surface Dryer Electrified Filter Bed
(EFB) Outlet 2'15
2-6 Process Data for Testing at Microboard Press Vents 1, 3, and 5 2-16
2-7 Process Data for Testing at Microbaorad Press Unloader Vents 2-17
3-1 MDF Aldehydes/Ketones Emissions Summary 3-2
3-2 Microboard Aldehydes/Ketones Emissions Summary 3-3
3-3 PM10 and Total Particulate Emissions Summary 3-7
3-4 Semivolatile Organic Emissions Summary 3-9
3-5 Volatile Organic Summary 3-10
3-6 Total Hydrocarbons Emissions Summary 3-13
3-7 Carbon Monoxide and Nitrogen Oxides Emissions Summary . 3-14
ALDEHYDES/KETONES TEST SUMMARIES
3-8 MDF Cyclone Outlet (DB) 3-16
3-9 MDF Press Stack 2 (WIW-2) 3-18
3-10 MDF Press Stack 3 (WIW-1) 3-20
3-11 MDF Press Stack 4 (WIW-5) 77. . . . .7 . 3-22
3-12 MDF Press Stack 5 (WIW-3) 3-24
3-13 MDF Press Stack 6 (WIW-4) . 3-26
3-14 Surface EFB Outlet (1510) 3-28
3-15 Core EFB Outlet (1520) 3-30
3-16 Microboard Press Stack 11 (DEF-1) 3-32
3-17 Microboard Press Stack 12 (DEF-3) 3-34
VI
-------
LIST OF TABLES
(Cont.)
TABLE TITLE PAGE
3-18 Microboard Press Stack 13 (DEF-5) 3-36
3-19 Microboard Cooling Room 14 (DEF-7) 3-38
3-20 Microboard Cooling Room 15 (DEF-8) 3-40
PARTICULATE and CONDENSIBLE PARTICULATE TEST SUMMARIES
3-21 MDF Cyclone Outlet (DB) 3-42
3-22 Surface EFB Inlet (1510) 3-43
3-23 Core EFB Inlet (1520) 3-44
PM10 TEST SUMMARIES
3-24 MDF Cyclone Outlet (DB) 3-45
3-25 MDF Press Stack 2 (WIW-2) 3-46
3-26 MDF Press Stack 3 (WIW-1) 3-47
3-27 MDF Press Stack 4 (WTW-5) 3-48
3-28 MDF Press Stack 5 (WIW-3) 3-49
3-29 MDF Press Stack 6 (WTW-4) 3-50
3-30 Surface EFB Outlet (1510) 3-51
3-31 Core EFB Outlet (1520) 3-52
3-32 Microboard Press Stack 11 (DEF-1) 3-53
3-33 Microboard Press Stack 12 (DEF-3) 3-54
3-34 Microboard Press Stack 13 (DEF-5) . . , , , , , , . . 3-55
3-35 Microboard Press Stacks 14 & 15 (DEF-7 & 8) 3-56
SEMFVOLATILE ORGANIC TEST SUMI.LUUZC
3-36 MDF Cyclone Outlet (DB) 3-57
3-37 Surface EFB Outlet (151C) 3-58
3-38 Core EFB Outlet (1520) 3-59
TOTAL HYDROCARBON TEST SUMMARIES
3-39 MDF Cyclone Outlet (DB) 3-60
3-40 MDF Press Stack 2 (WTW-2) 3-60
3-41 MDF Press Stack 3 (WIW-1) 3-61
vii
-------
LIST OF TABLES
(Cont.)
TABLE TITLE
3-42 MDF Press Stack 4 (WIW-5) 3'61
3-43 MDF Press Stack 5 (WTW-3) 3'62
3-44 MDF Press Stack 6 (WIW-4) 3'62
3-45 Surface EFB Inlet 3"63
3-46 Core EFB Inlet 3'63
CARBON MONOXIDE, NITROGEN OXIDES & TOTAL HYDROCARBON
TEST SUMMARIES
3-47 Surface EFB Outlet (1510) 3-64
3-48 Core EFB Outlet (1520) 3-65
TOTAL HYDROCARBON TEST SUMMARIES
3-49 Microboard Press Stack 11 (DEF-1) ... 3-66
3-50 Microboard Press Stack 12 (DEF-3) '. 3-66
3-51 Microboard Press Stack 13 (DEF-5) 3-67
3-52 Microboard Cooling Room Stack 14 (DEF-7) 3-68
3-53 Microboard Cooling Room Stack 15 (DEF-8) 3-68
3-54 Microboard Press Stacks 16, 17, & 18 (DEF-2,4,6) 3-69
VOLATILE ORGANICS TEST SUMMARIES
3-55 MDF Cyclone Outlet (DB) 3-70
3-56 Surface EFB Outlet (1510) 3-71
3-57 Core EFB Outlet (1520) ... . . .''.. [. . . ." ~... . . . . 3-72
4-1 Sampling Location Parameters 4-2
6-1 MOOlla Matrix Spike Duplicates - Percent Recovery 6-8
6-2 MOOlla Field Bias Blank and Reported MDLs 6-8
6-3 Field Laboratory Blank VOST Tube Results Expressed
in Micrograms (ug) 6-12
6-4 VOST Audit Samples 6-13
vui
-------
LIST OF TABLES
(Cont.)
TABLE TITLE PAGE
7-1 Summary of Emission Factors for Particle Dryer 7-3
7-2 Summary of Emission Factors for MDF Press 7-4
7-3 Summary of Emission Factors for Microboard Surface Dryer 7-5
7-4 Summary of Emission Factors for Microboard Core Dryer 7-6
7-5 Summary of Emission Factors for Microboard Press 7-7
IX
-------
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE TITLE PAGE
1 3
1-1 Test Program Organization Chart
2-1 Process Flow Diagram for Medium Density Fiberboard Production 2-3
2-2 Process Flow Diagram for Microboard (Particleboard) Production 2-6
4-1 MDF Dryer B Cyclone Outlet Sampling Location 4'3
4-2 MDF Press Building 4'5
4-3 MDF Press Stack #2 Sampling Location (WIW-2) 4'6
4-4 MDF Press Stack #3 Sampling Location (WIW-1) 4'7
4-5 MDF Press Stack #4 Sampling Location (WTW-5) 4-8
4-6 MDF Press Stack #5 Sampling Location (WTW-3) 4-9
4-7 MDF Press Stack #6 Sampling Location (WTW-4) 4-10
4-8 EFB Inlet Sampling Location 4rl2
4-9 EFB Outlet Sampling Location (1510 or 1520) 4-13
4-10 Microboard Press Building 4-14
4-11 Microboard Press and Cooling Room Sampling Location (DEF) 4-15
5-1 EPA Method 0011, Aldehydes/Ketones Sampling Train 5-3
5-2 Preparation Procedures for Aldehyde/Ketone Sampling Trains 5-4
5-3 Sampling Procedures for Aldehyde/Ketone 5-5
5-4 Sample Recovery Procedures for Aldehyde/Ketone Sampling Trains 5-6
5-5 Analytical Scheme for Aldehyde/Ketone 5-8
5-6 EPA Method 5/202 - Particulate and Condensible Particulate
Sampling Train 5-11
5-7 Preparation: Procedures for Particulate and Condensible Sampling Train . . 5-13
5-8 Test Procedures for Particulate and Condensibl^ c——'''.::• ^ "
5-9 Sample Recovery Procedures for Particulate and Condensible
Sampling Train „ 5-15
5-10 Analysis Procedures for Particulate Samples 5-16
5-11 EPA Method 2014 - PM10 Sampling Train 5-18
5-12 Preparation Procedures for PM10 Sampling Train 5-19
-------
LIST OF FIGURES
(cont.)
FIGURE TITLE PAGE
5-13 Test Procedures for PM10 Sampling Train 5-20
5-14 Sample Recovery Procedures for PM10 Sampling Train 5-21
5-15 EPA Method 0010 - Semivolatiles Organic Sampling Train 5-23
5-16 Preparation Procedures for Semivolatiles Sampling Train 5-24
5-17 Sampling Procedures for Semivolatiles 5-25
5-18 Sample Recovery Procedures for Semivolatiles 5-26
5-19 Semivolatiles Analysis Scheme 5-28
5-20 EPA Method 0030 - Volatile Organic Sampling Train (VOST) 5-30
5-21 Preparation Procedures for Volatile Organic Sampling Train 5-31
5-22 Sampling Procedures for Volatile Organics 5-32
5-23 Recovery Procedures for Volatile Organics 5-33
5-24 Analytical Procedures for Volatile Organics 5-34
XI
-------
SECTION 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND
The purpose of this test program was to assist EPA in the development of emission factors
for selected hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) emitted from several processes associated with
the wood products industry. Roy F. Weston, Inc. (WESTON) was contracted to conduct the
air emissions testing at Weyerhaeuser Company (WEYCO) in Moncure, North Carolina
during September 10 to September 27, 1992. The processes that were tested include:
• Medium Density Fiberboard (MDF) particle dryer B - cyclone outlet
• Medium Density Fiberboard Press - 5 roof vents
• Two Microboard dryers - inlets and outlets to electric charged fluidized bed (EFB)
cyclones
• Microboard press - 8 roof vents
The MDF particle dryer and the microboard dryers are the only sources with control
devices. A detailed description of the processes is presented in Section 2. A summary of
the emission results is presented in Section 3. Parameters and sampling locations are
further discussed in Section 4. Descriptions of sampling and analytical methods are included
in Section 5. Quality control measures employed during this program are described in
Section 6. Emission factors developed for each process are presented in Section 7.
Appendices (A-E) containing information for verification of this report have been compiled
in Volumes II through IV.
/•
12 PROGRAM OBJECTIVES
The objectives of the test program were to:
• Collect valid, representative samples during normal process operation conditions of the
sources to be evaluated.
• Measure the emissions of aldehyde/ketones, condensible particulate, PMj0, semivolatile
organics, total hydrocarbons, total particulate matter, and volatile organics at the MDF
particle dryer B cyclone outlet (MDF cyclone outlet).
1-1
-------
organics, total hydrocarbons, total paniculate matter, and volatile organics at the
particle dryer B cyclone outlet (MDF cyclone outlet).
• Measure aldehyde/ketones, condensible particulate, PM^, ^d total hydrocarbon
emissions from the MDF press vents (5 locations).
• Measure simultaneously the emissions of condensible particulate, PM^ and total
hydrocarbons at inlet and outlet locations of the EFB's on the microboard core layer
particle dryer (core EFB) and the microboard surface layer particle dryer (surface Ef-B).
• Measure carbon monoxide, formaldehyde (plus other aldehydes and ketones), nitrogen
oxide (NOJ, semivolatile organic, and volatile organic emissions at the outlet locations
of the core EFB and surface EFB.
• Measure aldehyde/ketones, condensible particulate, and PM^ emissions from the
microboard press room exhausts (3 of 6 vents).
• Measure the total hydrocarbon emissions from the six microboard press room exhausts.
• Measure the emissions of condensible particulate, formaldehyde (plus other aldehydes
and ketones), PM10, and total hydrocarbons from the microboard cooling press room
exhausts.
• Obtain sufficient process and control device information to allow the assessment of
representative operating conditions.
• Document all data in a comprehensive report.
1.3 KEY PERSONNEL
Figure 1-1 presents the organization and major lines of communication for this test program.
•
1.4 OUTLINE OF TEST PROGRAM
/
The types of samples collected were dependent on the location being evaluated. Pollutants
that were measured include:
• Aldehyde/ketones • Particulate matter
• Carbon monoxide • Semivolatile organics
• Condensible particulate • Total hydrocarbons
• Nitrogen Oxides (NOJ • Volatile organics
. PM.O
Table 1-1 is a test log which presents the sampling locations, emissions measured, test dates,
types of sampling, and run numbers.
1-2
-------
EPA/
Technical C
Dallas!
(919) 54
EIB
oordinator
>a£net
1-5371
EPA/1
Work As?
Mam
Dennis H
(919) 54
MRI
Process Monitoring
Ramesh Kalagnaman
(919) 677-0249
WESTON
Test Crew
2MB
ignment
iger
olzschuh
1-5239
WESTON
Project Director
Jim Seme
(919) 380-7410
WESTON
Test Director
Michael Kirkman
(919) 380-7410
WEYCO
Plant Contact
Joseph Kloeker
(919) 542-2128
WESTON
QA/QC Omcer
Michael White
(919) 380-7410
Triangle Laboratories,
Inc.
Organic Analyses
Gene Riley
(919) 544-4412
WESTON Analytics
Gravimetric Analyses
Dick Keenan
(205) 887-0600
Figure 1-1.
Test Program Organization Chart
1-3
-------
TABLE 1-1
TcttLog
Sampling Location
MDF Cyclone Outlet
(WEYCO ID-DB)
M DP Prou 3u<± 2
(wrw-2)
MDPPrcuSt»ct3
(Wrw-1)
MDPPrauSuci4
(WTW-5)
M DP Pru* Suck 5
(WTW-3)
M DP Pm> Suck 6
(WfW-4)
Emissions Measured
Aldcbydo/
Kclooci
P«rticul«ic &
Coodcnsibfef
PM10
Semivolitile
HAPi
Toul
Hydrocarbon*
Volilik
HAPi
Aldebydci/
Ketonc*
PMlOi
Coodetuibtef
Toul
Hydrocarbons
Aldebydei/
Ketoaea
PMI04
Condennblci
Toul
Hydrocarbons
Aldcbydev
Kctoocs
PMIOi
Condcruibks
Toul
Hydrocarbon*
AJdehyd««/
Kelooei
PMlOi
Coadeaiibles
Toul
Hydrocarbons
Aldcbydei/
Kcloocs
PMIO&
Coodciuiblci
Toul
Hydrocarbotu
Type of Sampling
Method 00 11
Metbod 5/Z02
Method 20 1A
MclbodOOlO
Metbod 25A
Metbod 0030
Metbod 00 II
. Metbod 20IA/202
Metbod 25A
Metbod 0011
Metbod 20IA/202
Method 25A
Metbod 0011
Metbod 201 A/202
Metbod 25 A
Metbod 0011
Mtlhod201A/202
Method 25A
Metbod 0011
Metbod 20 1 A/202
Metbod 2SA
Run NumbersYTest Date\ClockTime
Repetition .
MDFCO-MOOM-1
9/76(1326-1457)
MDPCO-MS/202-1
4/25 (1327- 1457)
MDPCO-M201A-I
o/25 (1116-1457)
MDPCO- MOO 10-1
9/26 (1135-1456)
MDPCO- M25A-1
9/25 (1255-1458)
MDFCO-M0030-I
a/26 (1135-1456)
MDFP2-M0011-I
»/ll (1924-2050)
MDPP2-M201A/202-2
9/10(1148-1739)
MDFP2-M25A-1
9/11 (1934-2100)
MDPP3-M001I-1
9/11(1928-2050)
MDPP3-M201A/202-2
9/10(1148-1742)
MDFP3-M25A-I
9/11(1934-2100)
MDFP4-M0011-1
9/12 (1802-1939)
MDFP4-M201A/202-2
9/12 (1625-2059)
MDPP4-M25A-1
9/12 (1753-2038)
MDFP5-M0011-I
9/12 (1757-1904)
MDFP5-M201A/202-2
9/12 (1625-2122)
MDPP5-M25A-I
9/12 (1753-2038)
MDFP6-MOOH-I
9/11 (1928.. 2056)
MDPP6-M201A/202-2
9/10(925-1458)
MDPP6-M25A-1
9/11(1934-2100)
2
MDPCO-M0011-2
9/26 (1626-1741)
MDPCO-M5/202-2
9/25(1626-1745)
MDPCO- M201A-2
9/26 (1707-1937)
MDFCO-M0010-2
9/26 (1706-1945)
MDPCO-M25A-2
9/25 (1540-1742)
MDFCO-M0030-2
9/26 (1545-1855)
MDPP2-M001I-2
9/12 (848-1021)
M DFP2- M201A/202-2
9/11 (740-1145)
MDPP2-M25A-3A
9/12 (1211-1335)
MDFP3-M0011-2
9/12 (848-1009)
MDPP3-M201A/202-2
9/11 (740-1158)
MDPP3-M25A-3A
9/12 (1211-1335)
MDPP4-M0011-2
9/13 (938-1132)
MDPP4-M201Ay202-2
9/13 (840-1253)
MDPP4-M25A-2
9/13 (830-1022)
MDFP5-M0011-2
9/13 (93S-IIII)
MDPP5-M201A/202-2
9/13 (840-1226)
MDPP5-M25A-2
9/13 (830-1022)
MDPP6-MOOI1-2
9/12 (848-1019)
M DPP6- M201A/202-2
9/11 (735-1159)
MDPP6-M25A-3A
9/12 (1211-1335)
3
MDPCO-M0011-3
9/26 (1843-2018)
MDFCO-M5/202-3
9/25(1843-2021)
MDFCO-M201A-3
9/27 (945-1248)
MDPCO-M0010-3
9/27 (955-1200)
MDPCO-M25A-3
9/25 (1824-2018)
MDPCO- M0030-3
9/27 (955-1200)
MDPP2-M001I-3
9/12 (1211-1427)
M DPP2- M20W2O2- 3
9/11 (1353-1821)
MDPP2-M25A-3C
9/12 (1335-1446)
MDPP3-MOOI1-3
9/12 (1211-1410)
MDPP3-M20W202-3
9/11 (1352-1803)
MDPP3-M25A-3C
9/12 (1335-1446)
MDFP4-M0011-3
9/13 (1248-1420)
MDPP4-M201A/202-3
9/13 (1408-1812)
MDPP4-M25A-3
9/13 (1249-1533)
MDFPS-M0011-3
9/13 (1246-1420)
M DPP5- M20W202-3
9/13 (1348-1842)
MDPP5-M2JA-3
9/13 (1249-1533)
MDFP6-M0011-3
9/12 (1212-1418)
MDPP6-M201A/202-3
9/11 (1353-1756)
MDFP6-M25A-3C
9/12 (1335-1446)
(continued next page)
1-4
-------
TABLE 1 -1 (continued)
Tot Log
Sampling Location
Surface EFB lake
Suck4
Surface EFB Outlet
Suck 10(1510)
Con EFB laJet
Stack?
Con EPB Outlet
Suck 8 (152O)
Mierobeara1 Pro.
Suck 11 (DEF-1)
Microbeard Prcei
Suck 12 (DEF-3)
Emissions Measured
Paniculate A
Coodenilblei
Toul
Hjrdrocarbocu
Aldehydei/
Ketonei
Carbon
Monoxide
Nitrogen
Oxide*
PMlOa
Condensibles
Semivoiatile
HAPi
Vol. lit
HAPl
Pamculue &
Coodcnubles
Toul
Hydrocarbon!
Aldehydei/
Kctooci
Carbon
Monoxide
Nitro|en
On del
PMlOi
Condeniibtei
Scmivolatile
HAPi
Toul
Hydrocarbon]
Volatile
HAPi
Aldebydei/
Ketonei
PMIO*
Coodenitblet
Toul
Hydrocarbon!
Aldehydei/
Ketooel
PMIO«
Coadensiblei
Toul
Hydrocarbons
Type of Sampling
Method 3/202
Method 2SA
Method 00 II
Method 10
Method 7E
Method 20 IA/202
Method 0010
Method 0030
Metbod 5/702
Metbod 25A
Method 00 11
Metbod 10
Metbod 7E
Metbod 20 IA/202
Metbod 0010
Method 25A
Metbod OOJO
Method 0011
Metbod 201 A/202
Metbod 2SA
Method 0011
Metbod 20 IA/202
Metbod 25A
Run NumbersVTest Date\ClockTime
Repetition
1
MBSLI-MS/202-2
«/l6 (1221-1354)
MBSLI-M25A-1
W16 (1K5-I330)
MBSLO-M001I- 1
9/16 (IKS- 1307)
MBSLO-CEM-I
1/16 (1145-1330)
MBSLO-CEM-I
9/16 (1I4S- 1330)
MBSLO-M201A/202-2
•)/16 (1225-1357)
MBSLO-M0010-I
1/17 (1227- ISO"))
MBSLO-M0030-I
9/17 (1227- 1500)
MBCLI- MS/202- 2
9/15 (1210-1411)
MBCLI-M25A-I
9/14 (1723- 1852)
MBCLO-M001I- 1
9/14 (1711-1816)
MBCLO-CEM-3
9/15 (1407-1507)
MBCLO-CEM-I
9/N (1723-1852)
MBCLO-M20I A/202-2
9/15 ( 1204- 141 1)
MBCLO- MOO 10-1
9/17 (1204-1533)
MBCLO-CEM-I
9/14 (1723-1852)
MBCLO-M0030-I
9/17 (1219-1446)
MBPI1-M0011-I
9/19 (1636-1753)
MBPII-M20IA/202-I^
9/19 (1044- 1513)
MBPII-M2SA-I
9/19 (1505-1800)
MBP1Z-MOOI 1- 1
9/19 (I636-I7S4)
MBPI2-M20IA/202- 1
9/19 (1041-1528)
MBPI2-M25A-I
9/19 (1505-1800)
:
MBSL1-M5/202-3
9/16 (1505-1620)
MBSL1-M25A-2
9/16 (1518-16)0)
MBSLO-M001I-2
9/16 (1505-1620)
MBSLO-CEM-2
9/16 (1518-1630)
MBSLO-CEM-2
9/16 (1518-1630)
MBSLO-M201A/202-3
9/16 (I5SO-1719)
MBSLO-M0010-2
9/17 (1713-1950)
MBSLO-M0030-2
9/17 (1717-1901)
MBCLI-MS/202-3
9/1S (1547-1729)
MBCLI-M25A-<
9/15 (1648-1748)
MBCLO-M0011-2
9/IS (1304-1409)
MBCLO-CEM-4
9/15 (1648-1748)
MBCLO-CEM-4
9/15 (1648-1748)
MBCLO- M201A/202-3
9/15 (1546-1736)
MBCLO-M0010-2
9/17 (1801-2035)
MBCLO-CEM-4
9/15 (1648-1748)
MBCLO-M0030-2
9/17 (1804-2022)
MBP11-M001I-2
9/21 (1810-1927)
MBP11-M201A/202-2
9/21 (1810-1927)
MBP1I-M25A-2
9/21 (1900-2003)
MBPI2- MOO 11-2
9/21 (1810-1927)
MBPI2-M20IA/202-2
9/21 (858- 1325)
MBP12-M25A-2
9/21 (1900-2003)
3
MBSL1-M5/202-4
9/17 (839-955)
MBSLI-M25A-3
9/17 (840-10JO)
MBSLO-MOOil-3
9/17 (859-1016)
MBSLO-CEM-3
9/17 (840-1030)
MBSLO-CEM-3
9/17 (840-1030)
MBSLO-M20W202-4
9/17 (839- 1027)
MBSLO-M0010-3
9/18 (1225-1508)
MBSLO-M0030-3
9/18 (1225-1412)
MBCLI- M5/202-4
9/15 (1858-2024)
MBCL1-M25A-S
9/15 (1900-2000)
MBCLO-M0011-3
9/15 (1633-1738)
MBCLO-CEM-5
9/15 (1900-2000)
MBCLO-CEM-5
9/15 (1900-2000)
MBCLO-M201A/202-4
9/15 (1857-2029)
MBCLO-M0010-3
9/18 (1249- 1551)
MBCLO-CEM-5
9/15 (1900-2000)
MBCLO-M0030-3
9/18 (1255-1529)
MBP11-MOOI1-3
9/22 (1421-1639)
MBP11-M201A/202-3
9/22 (906-1309)
MBP11-M25A-3
9/22 (1352-1545)
MBP12-M001I-3
9/22 (1421-1639)
MBPI2-M201A/202-3
9/22 (906- 1305)
MBP12-M25A-3
9/22 (1352-1545)
(continued next page)
1-5
-------
TABLE 1-1 (continued)
Tat Log
Sampling Location
Microtek Pro.
St*ct 13 (DEP-5)
MB CooliBt Room
Sue* 14 (DEP-7)
MB Cootiot Rooa
SUti li (DEF-8)
Microtoird Proi
Sucta 16, 17, 1»
(DEF-2,4,6)
Emissions Measured
Aldebydei/
Kctooci
PM10A
Conderuiblei
Toul
Hydrocarbon*
Aldehydei/
Ketooci
PMI04
Coadcoaibks
Toul
Hydrocartwns
Aldebydei/
KetofMS
PMIO&
Condeniibtes
Toul
Hydrocarboiu
Toul
Hydrocjrbow
Toul
HydrocArfaoni
Type of Sampling
MelbodOOll
Method 201 A/202
Method 2SA
Method 00 II
Method 20IA/202
Method 25 A
Method 00 II
Method 20 IA/202
Method 25A
Method 25A
Method 23A
Run NumbcnVTest Date\Clock Time
R,Pftition
1
MBPI3-M001I-1
4/10 (1636-1751)
MBPI3-M201A/20Z-I
9/1° (1021-1518)
MBP1J-M25A-I
«/l9 (1505- 1800)
MBCRI4-MOOI1-1
9/22 (1733-1900)
MBCRI4-M20IA/202- 1
9/23 (I05S-H59)
MBCRM-M25A-1
9/22 (1733-1900)
MBCRI5-MOOII-I
9/22 (1733-1900)
MBCRI5-M201A/202- 1
9/23 (1055-1502)
MBCR15-M25A- 1
9/22 (1733-1900)
MDPPI6-M25A-1
»/!9 (0900- 1000)
MDPP16-M25A-4
9/21 (1210-1328)
2
MBP13-MOOI1-2
9/21 (1810-1973)
MBPI3-M20IA/202-2
9/21 (858-1301)
MBPI3-M25A-2
9/21 (1900-2003)
MBCR14-M001I-2
9/22 (1931-2059)
MBCRI4-M25A-2
9/22 (1900-210S)
MBCRIS-M0011-2
9/22 (1931-2059)
ft
MBCRI5-M25A-2
9/22 (1900-2105)
MDPP16-M2SA-2
9/19 (1022-1129)
3
MBP1J-M001I-J
9/22 (753-927)
MBP13-M20IA/202-3
9/22 (904- 1256)
MBP13-M25A-3
9/22 (1352-1545)
MBCR14-M0011-3
9/24 (753-927)
MBCR15-M0011-3
9/24 (753-927)
MDPP16-M25A-3
9/21 (0900-1200)
(continued next page)
1-6
-------
SECTION 2
PROCESS DESCRIPTION AND OPERATION
2.1 INTRODUCTION
Facility B in Moncure, North Carolina, produces medium density fiberboard (MDF) and a
furniture-grade particleboard called microboard. Facility B purchased the MDF mill on
September 28, 1974, and in 1986 expanded the plant by constructing the microboard line,
which began production in October 1987. The MDF mill has a rated annual production
capacity of 93 x 105 square feet on a 3/4 inch basis and produced 71.2 x 105 square feet in
1991. The microboard line has a rated production capacity of 120 x 105 square feet on a
3/4 inch basis and produced 92.2 x 105 square feet in 1991. The two mills employ a total
of 330 employees, and both mills run three shifts, 7 days a week. Every 2 weeks the plants
shut down for 12 hours of maintenance. In 1991 the MDF line operated 6,907 hours and
the microboard line operated 6,571 hours. The rated production capacity net shippable is
calculated using the production rate per hour on a 3/4-inch basis and multiplying it by
8,760 available hours per year, taking into account an average of 7 percent waste. The
facility is permitted to operate 8,400 hours per year.
22 PROCESS DESCRIPTION
Wood furnish (wood chips and sawdust) is received by truck and railcar and is deposited
into a common receiving bin that serves both mills. The truck dump bin is a three-sided,
aboveground metal enclosure with a chain drag conveyor at the bottom. The bin is
equipped with a hydraulic hoist that lifts the entire truck and tilts it approximately 45
degrees, allowing the furnish to flow out of the back of the trailer and into the receiving bin.
Unloading a trailer takes less than a minute. The wood furnish takes only a few seconds
to empty into the receiving bin once it starts to flow; the remainder of the time is spent
raising and lowering the truck. Because a common receiving bin is used for both sawdust
and wood chips, the bin must be completely emptied of wood chips before any sawdust can
2-1
-------
be dumped into the bin, and vice-versa. The sawdust or wood chips are taken from t e
receiving bin by a conveyor to the microboard or MDF plant storage piles. The storage
piles for the microboard plant are covered by an A-frame structure that is approximately
60 ft high, 50 ft wide, and 300 ft long. Wood chips are stored on an open pad. Conveyors
deposit the materials on the storage piles, and front-end loaders scoop it up and drop it into
a process feed bin located at the end of the structure. Logs are received by truck and
deposited in an open storage yard.
22.1 Medium-Density Fiberboard Mill
The MDF mill is approximately 20 years old and now produces 10,600 tf/hr (0.859 in.
thick), which is approximately 36,800 Ib/hr of board with an average finished product density
of 48.5 Ib/ft3. With the exception of the press, which has been upgraded, all of the process
equipment has been replaced over the years. The mill uses almost exclusively whole tree
hardwood chips (very little, if any, limbs or pine) that it receives from offsite chip mills. The
wood mix consists of 50 percent hardwoods (oak and hickory) and 50 percent soft
hardwoods (poplar, maple, beech, birch, gum, sweetgum, sycamore).
A process flow diagram of the MDF production process is presented in Figure 2-1. The
MDF production process begins as wood chips received by truck at the unloading bin are
screened to remove undesirable chips and metal and washed in a water bath to remove dirt
and other debris.
The cleaned chips are conveyed to two presteaming bins to heat and loosen the wood fibers,
after which the chips are sent to refiners where the chips are mechanically pulped. The two
refiner lines each process approximately 26,000 Ib/hr of material (dry basis).
The separated fibers enter a blow line, where wax, formaldehyde scavenger, and
urea/formaldehyde resin are blended with the fibers. The wax coats the surface of the
fibers to retard their tendency to absorb excessive amounts of the resin used to bind the
fibers. The fibers exiting the blow line contain approximately 7.8 percent resin by weight.
2-2
-------
to
U)
TRUCK
«, A
./ \
Z^~ \
an* \
HORACE \
\
or ^ |
1
11 ram
ll
MESM/WAX WSM/WAX
AIIK1WN SCAVENGER ATTOpOH $CAVtHCX*
1 1
1 J i
taow urc 1
f** PtUCNNO ^
UMIX0
FOEft nCCOVCTT
CTCtONES
\ / \ /
V I ""
1 j DRr FIBEH f
j SIOftACC ON
1
I 1
1 1
* f fwcwrwrmi
FOfiSuOl I I FMtMEM 1 1 rOAUTN O U
II 1 ( . ^^^^ ^-1
. -^ ^^^H
r-1 :
^ *
I as TUBE
LutnctoHE
1
mtiiH
totin . .
1
— • I HAM
"* \ M
nvss
vwis
n n .
PRESS X
HOOD \
« « ^-JS
1 • *^~S
. • /^
-I W
FIGURE 2-1
Process Flow Diagram for Medium Density Fiberboard Production
-------
After resin blending in the blow line, the fibers enter a 54-inch diameter steam- and
thermal-oil heated drying tube, where they are dried to approximately 8.5 to 9 percent
moisture. The dried fibers are collected by a 17-ft diameter high efficiency cyclone,
weighed, and sent to a dry storage bin.
From the dry storage bin, the fiber is sent to one of three formers. The formers lay the
fiber on an 5-foot-wide, continuous moving mat hi three layers, which are precompressed
by a system of belts and rollers. The continuously precompressed mat is cut into
68 in. x 296 in. sections by a flying cutoff saw. The individual mats are sent to a staging
area in preparation for loading into the press. The mats are fed into a 6.5 ft x 25.5 ft
eight-opening steam-heated press. The press is capable of producing panels between 3/8-in.
and 1-1/2-in. in 3/32-in. increments. The average cycle time hi 1992 was 18.8 seconds per
1/16 in. of finished thickness as of November 1. Steam for the press is supplied by the
80,000 Ib/hr fixed grate Keeler boiler. The boiler is grate fired by wood waste. The ash is
sent to a recycler for use in a potting soil mixture. Paniculate matter (PM) emissions from
the boiler are controlled by an 88-tube multiclone, followed by a wide-gap venturi wet
scrubber. The design pressure drop across the scrubber is 8 in. of water column.
The press and unloader area is enclosed at the top and is equipped with three exhaust fans
to pull escaping vapors from the press and unloader. The gases exiting the press are vented
directly to the atmosphere. Two area roof fans also assist in ventilating the press area.
The panels exiting the press are sent to a horizontal board cooler, where they are allowed
to cool at ambient temperature. Once cooled, the panels are sent to be sanded, inspected,
and cut into various sizes. Panels not meeting the industry specifications are labeled as
second-grade product and are sold or are sent to the hammermill for preparation as fuel to
the boile?. The mill generates approximately 8,000 Ib of trim waste per hour for 12 hours
per day; most of the trim waste is sent to a hogger and then to the presteaming bins for
reuse as board furnish. The remainder of the board trim is used as boiler fuel. The sawdust
and sanderdust generated in the panel finishing operations are collected in several
2-4
-------
baghouses and sent to a silo. These waste materials are ultimately used as fuel for the
Keeler boiler.
222 Microboard Mill
The microboard mill has been on-line since October 1987. The mill press produces
14,785 ft2/hour of 0.813-in. thick board having a density of 43.2 Ib/ft3. This corresponds to
approximately 43,573 Ib/hr of board with an average finished product density of 42.5 Ib/ft5.
The microboard mill processes primarily pine wood (core = 100 percent southern pine,
95 percent long leaf loblolly logs, 5 percent short leaf pine logs; surface = 60 percent
southern pine sawdust, 40 percent hardwood sawdust) into a furniture-grade particleboard
panel. The panel is made up of five layers. The inner layer consists of wood flakes and is
sandwiched between two layers of sawdust. The outer surfaces comprise sanderdust, giving
the panel a very smooth blemish-free surface that is necessary for applying thin laminates
and veneers. The board can be made in any thickness between 3/8 in. and 1-3/16 in. in
1/16-in. increments.
A process flow diagram of the microboard plant is shown in Figure 2-2. Sawdust is received
by truck, deposited at the truck unloading bin and conveyed to the sawdust A-frame storage
building. Logs, used to make flakes, are also received by truck and are unloaded by a
gantry crane onto the log yard. The gantry crane loads the logs onto a conveyor that sends
them to a slasher saw and a debarker. The bark is sent to a fuel storage bin for use as fuel
in the Wellons burners. The debarked logs are sent to a flaker where rotating cutting knives
reduce the logs in thin flakes. The flakes, which are considerably smaller than those used
to produce oriented strandboard, are stored in a bin in preparation for drying.
Sawdust received from the sawdust storage pile is air-sifted to remove dirt, rocks, and other
debris. The sawdust and flakes are kept separate in the process and are dried separately
in two single-pass rotary drum dryers. The flakes are dried to a moisture content of
between 2.0 and 2.5 percent and sawdust is dried to a moisture content of about 6 to 6.5
percent. The dryers are heated with exhaust gases from the Wellons burner and from heat
supplied by McConnel suspension dust burners. The core layer dryer maintains an inlet
2-5
-------
ON
\ra***\ \TQK**\
PRESS
1MMHC/SMCM6
SAMMC
BOMtO
COOLER
FIGURE 2-2
Process Flow Diagram for Microboard (Particleboard) Production
-------
temperature of approximately 480° to 680°C (900° to 1250T) and an outlet temperature of
130° to 140°C (260° to 280°F). An inlet temperature of 320° to 480°C (600° to 900°F) and
an outlet temperature of 91° to 96°C (195° to 205°F) are maintained on the surface layer
dryer. Exhaust gases exiting the dryers are sent through to a bank of four high- efficiency
multiclones for PM removal. An electrified filter bed (EFB) downstream from the
multiclones collects fine PM and condensible organic materials.
In the EFB, fine dust particles in the dryer exhaust are given an electrostatic charge in the
corona formed by the ionizers and then are deposited on electrically polarized filter beds
of pea gravel. The pea gravel is continuously removed from the filtration region and
cleaned externally in a pneumatic conveyor. The dust removed from the gravel is conveyed
to a small bag filter, and cleaned gravel is returned to the EFB. Particulate matter collected
in the small bag filter is sent to a nursery and mixed with potting soil.
The sticky nature of the condensing wood resins in the dryer exhaust and the presence of
high moisture and PM concentration often result in a build-up of this material on the ionizer
ring of the EFB, thereby decreasing the EFB's removal efficiency. Each system is equipped
with an automatic sand-blast cleaning system that periodically removes the resins and
paniculate that stick to the ionizer ring. Sticky wood resins also tend to buildup on the core
layer EFB gravel. -As a result, Facility B continuously exchanges the gravel in the core EFB
with the gravel in the surface EFB and vice versa in an effort to remove the condensed
wood resins from the gravel formerly in the core EFB.
From the dryers, the dried sawdust and flakes are screened to separate the various particle
sizes and stored in separate dry storage bins. Sanderdust from the board sanding operation
is also collected in a storage bin. All three furnish materials are resinated with
urea/formaldehyde resin in separate blenders and sent to the formers. The formers deposit
the furnish in a continuous manner on a 9.4-foot (113-in.) wide moving caul screen in the
five layers described above. The thickness of each layer depends on the thickness of the
panel being produced.
2-7
-------
After the mat is formed, it is cut into 24.67 foot (296 in.) lengths by a flying cutoff saw. The
individual mats are loaded into a 9.94 ft x 24.97 ft (119-1/4 in. x 297-1/2 in.) five-opening
press that is heated by thermal oil to 350°R The mats are heated under pressure in the
press to density the mat and cure the resins holding the wood particles together. The
average press time required to cure the panels is about 3.5 minutes. The average cycle time
in 1992 was 15.8 sec per 1/16 in. of thickness as of November 1. Hot gases exiting the press
are exhausted out of the building by six roof-mounted exhaust fans.
After they are removed from the press, the panels are sent to a board cooler. From the
board cooler, the panels are sanded by a 10-ft-wide, eight-head sander. After sanding, the
panels are cut by a panel saw into various sizes to satisfy customer orders.
The most notable sources of fugitive PM emissions at the Moncure mill are the truck dump
area, and the two A-frame storage areas and the microboard silo area. All of the external
conveyors used to transport material through the plant are covered and appear to have
minimal PM emissions.
2.3 DESCRIPTION OF PROCESS PARAMETERS MONITORED DURING TESTING
Emission measurements were taken from five process units: MDF Dryer B, the MDF press,
the microboard core flake dryer, the microboard surface flake dryer, and the microboard
press. Additional samples were also collected to measure the fugitive emissions from the
MDF press unloader area, microboard press unloader area, and microboard cooling area.
The following sections describe the process parameters monitored during the test. Copies
of production reports were obtained for each day that tests were conducted.
2.3.1 MDF Press
Parameters that were monitored during the test include the following:
1. MDF dryer processing rates (Thayer scale readings) for both dryers, A and B;
2. Resin addition rate;
3. Wax addition rate;
2-8
-------
4. Scavenger addition rate;
5. Number of press cycles that occurred during the testing period; and
6. Size of boards produced (thickness, length, and width).
The amount of material processed by the dryers is monitored continuously. Both
instantaneous processing rate in Ib/hr and the cumulative flow in Ib are displayed
continuously. Resin application rates also are displayed continuously. Resin and wax
addition rates are expressed as percent of the maximum flow-rates of 20 gallons per minute
(gal/min) and 2.2 gal/min, respectively. Scavenger addition rate (gal/min) is displayed
continuously. Press cycles are recorded continuously. Noting the exact number of press
cycles that took place during the testing period enabled accurate estimation of the board
production rate during the testing period.
2.3.2 MDF Dryer B
Parameters that were monitored during the test include the following:
1. Processing rate of MDF dryer B;
2. Resin addition rate;
3. Wax addition rate; and
4. Scavenger addition rate.
To estimate the process rate for MDF Dryer B, the cumulative material flow readings taken
at the beginning and end of the test were used.
2.3.3 Core and Surface Flake Dryers
Parameters that were monitored during the test include the following:
1. Percent of the maximum capacity at which the dryer was operating;
2. Temperatures at the inlet and outlet of the dryer;
3. Sanderdust burning rate; and
4. EFB operating parameters, ionizer voltage, ionizer current, bed voltage, and bed
current.
The dryer process rates were estimated by simply obtaining the flake flow rate (on a dry
basis) corresponding to the percent setting from the calibration curves provided by Facility B
,, 2-9
-------
for both dryers.
2.3.4 Microboard Press
Parameters that were monitored during the test include the following:
1. Percent of the maximum capacity at which the dryer was operating;
2. Temperatures at the inlet and outlet of the dryer;
3. Sanderdust burning rate;
4. EFB operating parameters, ionizer voltage, ionizer current, bed voltage, and bed
current;
5. Number of press cycles that occurred during the testing period; and
6. Size of boards produced (thickness, length, and width).
Noting the exact number of press cycles that took place during the testing period is sufficient
to enable accurate estimation of the board production during the testing period.
2.4 SUMMARY OF PROCESS RATES
Using the data that were recorded as described above, process rates were estimated for each
run. The only exception is the PM-10 test for the microboard cooling area. There is no
process rate that corresponds to the cooling area. At any given time, there are a fixed
number of boards cooling off on a rack. Tables A-l through A-7 contain summaries of
process data for all the tests conducted at Facility B.
2-10
-------
TABLE 2-1. PROCESS DATA FOR TESTING AT MDF PRESS VENTS 1, 2, AND 4
Pollutant
PM-10
Aldehydes
and ketones
Run No.
1
2
3
1
2
3
Date
9/10/92
9/11/92
9/11/92
9/11/92
9/12/92
9/12/92
Time8
09:25 - 17:42
07:35 - 11:59
13:52 - 18:07
19:28 - 20:55
08:48 - 10:21
12:11 - 14:28
Board specifications
Thickness, in.
0.625
0.625
0.625
0.625
0.75
0.75
Length x
width, ft
24 x 5
24x5
24x5
24 x 5
24x5
24x5
Board
density, lb/ft3
48.6
48.6
48.6
48.6
47.1
47.1
Average
production
rate, 103/ft2
(actual)/hrb
10.5
17.2C
13.9
13.9d
11.5
12.8
Testing on stacks 1, 2, and 4 were carried out at different times. The time duration specified above corresponds to the time
when the first pro! j was introduced and when the last probe was removed, irrespective of the stack. This duration also
includes any down t roe, if applicable.
Production rates we e estimated based on notes marked on the press cycle strip chart. These notes corresponded to times
when the test start< J and when the test ended. Thus, the production rate was estimated by simply counting the number
of press cycles that took place within a specified time interval. Each press cycle produced 8 boards, each 24 ft long and
5 ft wide or 4 ft wide, as indicated in the table.
Tor run No. 2, because the mark on the stripchart corresponding to when the test started was not clear, the process rate was
estimated based on the amount of material generated by the two dryers during the testing period, based on the assumption
that all this material was used up to produce the boards during that time interval. Because the density of the board is
known, the amount of material in pounds was divided by the density to obtain the volume of board produced. The volume
of board in turn was divided by the board thickness to obtain the actual surface area.
'tor run No. 1, because the mark on the stripchart corresponding to when the test started was not clear, the process rate was
determined to be equal to that of PM-10 run No. 3. This assumption is valid because the same product was produced during
the aldehyde/ketone run No. 1 as was produced during the PM-10 run No. 3.
-------
TABLE 2-2. PROCESS DATA FOR TESTING AT MDF PRESS VENTS 3 AND 5
Pollutant
PM-10
Aldehydes
and ketones
Rim No.
1
2
3
1
2
3
Date
9/12/92
9/13/92
9/13/92
9/12/92
9/13/92
9/13/92
Time"
16:25 - 21:24
08:40 - 12:53
13:43 - 18:44
17:53 - 19:47
09:35 - 11:34
12:46 - 14:20
Board specifications
Thickness, in.
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.75
0.75
Length x
width, ft .
24 x 5
24x4
24 x 4
24x5
24x4
24x4
Board
density, lb/ft3
47.1
46.7
46.7
47.1
46.7
46.7
Average
production
rate, 103/ft2
(actual)/hrfc
11.9
10.3
15.4
11.8
10.6
10.1
N) Testing on stacks 3 and 5 were carried out at different times. The time duration specified above corresponds to the time
^ when the first probe was introduced and when the last probe was removed, irrespective of the stack. This time interval
also includes any down time, if applicable.
Production rates were estimated based on notes marked on the press cycle strip chart. These notes corresponded to times
when the test started and when the test ended. Thus, the production rate was estimated by simply counting the number
of press cycles that took place within a specified time interval. Each press cycle produced 8 boards, each 24 ft long and
5 ft wide or 4 ft wide as indicated in the table.
-------
TABLE 2-3. PROCESS DATA FOR TESTING ON MDF DRYER B CYCLONE
OUTLET
Pollutant
PM
Aldehydes and
ketones
PM-10
Semivolatiles
and volatiles
Run No.
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
Date
9/25/92
9/25/92
9/25/92
9/25/92
9/25/92
9/25/92
9/26/92
9/25/92
9/27/92
9/26/92
9/25/92
9/27/92
Time3
13:27 - 14:27
16:26 - 17:45
18:43 - 20:21
13:26 - 15:00
16:26 - 17:45
18:43 - 20:21
11:16 - 14:57
17:06 - 19:38
09:45 - 12:48
11:06 15:07
17:06 - 19:38
09:41 - 12:57
Furnish flow
rate, dry basis,
tons/hrb
9.02
9.41
8.72
9.02
9.41
8.72
7.66
7.41
8.54
7.66
7.41
8.54
aThe time duration specified above corresponds to the time when the probe was first introduced and
when the probe was finally removed and includes port changes and any applicable down time.
bThe furnish flow rate, dry basis, was estimated based on readings of cumulative flow of furnish,
minus the additive rates of resin, wax, and scavenger, and minus the moisture content.
2-13
-------
TABLE 2-4. PROCESS DATA FOR TESTING AT THE
CORE DRYER ELECTRIFIED FILTER BED (EFB) OUTLET
Pollutant
PM-10
Condensibles
Aldehydes and
ketones
Semivolatiles
Volatiles
Run No.
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
Date
9/14/92
9/15/92
9/15/92
9/15/92
9/14/92
9/15/92
9/15/92
9/15/92
9/14/92
9/15/92
9/15/92
9/17/92
9/17/92
9/18/92
9/17/92
9/17/92
9/18/92
Time8
16:02 - 18:58
12:04 - 14:11
15:46 - 17:36
18:57 - 20:30
16:19 - 19:10
12:03 - 14:11
15:47 - 17:29
18:58 - 20:24
17:11 - 18:16
13:04 - 14:10
16:34 - 17:38
12:04- 15:33
18:01 - 20:35
12:49- 15:51
12:19 - 14:46
18:01 - 20:22
12:55- 15:29
~
Core flake drying rate,
dry basis, (tons/hr)
13.13
12.43
11.88
12.31
13.14
12.51
11.8
12.31
11.12
12.31
12.22
12.31
12.31
12.31
12.31
12.31
12.31
aThe time duration specified above corresponds to the time when the probe was first introduced and
when the probe was finally removed and includes port changes and any applicable down time.
bThe core flake drying rate is estimated based on the operating capacity of the dryer during the test.
The operating capacity is set by the operator as a percent of the total flow. A calibration curve was
provided by the facility which gives the mass flow rate on a dry basis corresponding to different
fractions of the total capacity.
2-14
-------
TABLE 2-5. PROCESS DATA FOR TESTING AT THE SURFACE DRYER
ELECTRIFIED FILTER BED (EFB) OUTLET
Pollutant
PM-10
Condensibles
Aldehydes and
ketones
Semivolatiles
Volatiles
PM-1OC
Run No.
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
j
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
Date
9/16/92
9/16/92
9/17/92
9/16/92
9/16/92
9/17/92
9/16/92
9/16/92
9/17/92
9/17/92
9/17/92
9/18/92
9/17/92
9/17/92
9/18/92
9/18/92
Time3
12:25 - 13:58
15:50 - 17:19
08:39 - 10:27
12:21 - 13:54
15:39 - 16:59
08:39 - 10:27
11:43 - 13:01
15:05 - 16:20
08:59 - 10:16
12:27 - 15:09
17:13 - 19:50
12:25 - 15:08
12:29 - 15:09
17:17 - 19:01
12:25 - 14:12
09:25 - 10:52
Surface flake drying rate,
dry basis, (tons/hr)b
9.64
9.64
8.02
9.64
9.64
8.41
9.64
9.64
8.71
9.64
9.64
8.61
9.64
9.64
8.7
9.64
aThe time duration specified above corresponds to the time when the probe was first introduced and
when the probe was finally removed and includes port changes and any applicable down time.
"The surface flake drying rate is estimated based on the operating capacity of the dryer during the
test. The operating capacity is set by the operator as a percent of the total flow. A calibration curve
was provided by the facility which gives the. mass flow rate on a dry basis corresponding to different
fractions of the total capacity.
Simultaneous inlet and outlet test (one run only).
2-15
-------
TABLE 2-6. PROCESS DATA FOR TESTING AT MICROBOARD PRESS
VENTS 1, 3, AND 5
Pollutant
PM-10
Aldehydes
and ketones
Run No.
1
2
3
1
2
3
Date
9/19/92
9/21/92
9/22/92
9/19/92
9/21/92
9/22/92
Time"
10:20 - 15:28
08:58 - 13:25
09:04 - 13:10
16:35 - 17:53
18:10 - 19:23
14:21 - 15:39
Board specifications
Thickness,
inches
0.625
1
0.625
0.625
1
0.625
Length x
width, ft
24x9
24x9
24 x 9
24x9
24 x9 .
24x9
Average
production
rate, 103 ft2
(actual)/hrb
17.3
14.4
16.4
18.6
14.4°
16.4
Testing on stacks 1, 3, and 5 were carried out at different times. The time duration specified above
corresponds to the time when the first probe was introduced and when the last probe was removed,
irrespective of the stack and includes any applicable down time.
bProduction rates were estimated based on notes marked on the press cycle strip chart. These notes
corresponded to times when the test started and when the test ended. Thus, the production rate was
estimated by simply counting the number of press cycles that took place within a specified time
interval. Each press cycle produced 5 boards, each 24 ft long and 9 ft wide.
°For run No. 2, since the mark on the stripchart corresponding to when the test started was not clear,
the process rate was determined to be equal to that of PM-10 run No. 2. This assumption is valid
because the same product was produced during the aldehyde/ketone run No. 2 as was produced
during the PM-10 run No. 2.
2-16
-------
TABLE 2-7. PROCESS DATA FOR TESTING AT MICROBOARD PRESS
UNLOADER VENTS 1 AND 2
Pollutant
Aldehydes
and
ketones
PM-10
Run No.
1
2
3
1
Date
9/22/92
9/22/92
9/24/92
9/24/92
Time3
17:33 - 19:00
19:31 - 20:59
07:53 - 09:27
10:54 - 14:59
Board specifications
Thickness,
inches
0.625
0.625
0.625
0.625
Length x
width, ft
24x9
24x9
24x9
24x9
Average
production
rate, 103 ft2
(actual) /hr
17.1
17.7
15.4
15.9
aTesting on stacks 1 and 2 were carried out at different times. The time duration specified
above corresponded to the time when the first probe was introduced and when the last
probe was removed, irrespective of the stack and includes any applicable down time.
bProduction rates were estimated based on notes marked on the press cycle strip chart.
These notes corresponded to times when the test started and when the test ended. Thus,
the production rate was estimated by simply counting the number of press cycles that took
. place within a specified time interval. Each press cycle produced 5 boards, each 24 ft long
and 9 ft wide.
2-17
-------
SECTION 3
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
3.1 PRESENTATION
The tabulated results from all of the testing performed at WEYCO are presented in this
section. The results are presented in tables which are organized by pollutant group. Tables
3-1 through 3-7 summarize the test results for sampling performed at the MDF and
Microboard test locations. Individual run summaries are presented in Tables 3-8 through
3-57; refer to the "List of Tables and Figures" for a cross reference. Detailed results of all
the testing can be found in Appendix A; field and analytical data are provided in Appendix
B.
DISCUSSION
3.2.1 Aldehyde/Ketones
Tables 3-1 and 3-2 summarize the aldehyde/ketones results for the MDF and Microboard
sampling locations, respectively. Individual run summaries are presented in Tables 3-8
through 3-20.
Testing for aldehyde/ketones was performed using EPA Method 0011 (M0011). All sample
trains contained three impingers except for run MBCLO-M0011-3 performed at the Core
EFB Outlet which contained four impingers. Each impinger was analyzed separately to
verify
Formaldehyde was me major compound presem at all: sources. The m-tolualdehyde and p-
tolualdebvHp ronM r,ot be chromatographically resolved. Therefore, the data has been
calculated ror a mixture of m- and p-tolualdehyde.
3-1
-------
TABLE 3-1
MDF ALDEHYDES/KETONES AVERAGE EMBSOM3 SUMMARY
CONCENTRATION; jig/dun*
FORMALDEHYDE
ACETALDEHYDE
ACHOLEIN
ACETONE
PROPONALDEHYDE
CHOTONAUDEHYQS
n-BUTYRALDEHYDE
METHYL ETHYt KETONE
BENZALDEHYDE
SOVALERALDEHYDE
VALERALDEHYDE
O^tOLtlAtDEHYOe:
m/p-TOLUALDEHYDE
HEXALDEHYDE
25-OIMETHYL 8EN2ALDEHYD6
CONCEOTTMTKM^ppm:<*r brvokmw
FORMALDEHYDE
ACETALDEHYDe
ACFOLEIN'
ACETONE -:t
PROPONALDEHYDE
CnOTClNALDEHYOE:
n-BUTYRALDEHYDE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
BENZALDEHYDE
SCVALERAUDEHYDE
VALEHALDEHYDE
0-TOLUALDEHYDE
m/p- TOLUALDEHYDE
HEXALDEHYDE
2,5-DIMETHYL BENZALDEHYDE
EMISSION RATE, LB/HR
ACETALOEHYDe
ACFOLEIN
* 7~-~ • —
PROPONALDEHYDE
CROTONALDEHYDE
-. TJE
-. • .... ._.r..L^rONE
BENZALDEHYDE
ISOVAt_ERALDEHYOE
VALERALDEHYDE
0~TOLUALDEHYOE:
m/p-TOLUALDEHYDE
HEXALDEHYDE
25-OIMETHYL BENZALDEHYDE
MDFCydomOutat
336
56.7
104
M.I
49.4
73.2
1M
67J
«J
54^
••>,'• • -"I9J-
97J
67J
9.91
29^
-
0.0349
0.02581:
0.00571
aoiss .
0.0298
0.01D4: :
0.0126
0.02J7
0.0153
3.04
0.02Z9
0.00595
0.00730
0.00212
0.00200
0.00*88
0:00359
0.00116
-OJ002S7:::. ..:.'.
0.00494
0.00241
0.00291
0.0049S -:
0.00396
Stock 4
S.030
::. •' -. •:.:•»»••:
24JO
. • :.,,:TTJ-..
10.1
•: - :; :':37*;-
66.4
3JJ
15J
39.1
63.1
•••-•• v: ••:*»". •:-.
11.9
- :• -»*: •'
29-3
6.44
044U
0.0103
:.:,:::;:0^t321.-:- :4
0.00417
• . -0.012* ::::..-::;
0.0221
05D011I
0.00359
0.0109
0.0176
ttOOWT
0.00237
0.0240
0.00526
0.583
OJWS48
0.00174
O.OOSSS
0.000732
0.002.77
0.00484
0;000244
0.00115
'.:. ::.:.OJWB»S.-... :--;-
0.00*59
0.000729
0.000852
&00722 :
0.00214
Stocks
6J80
67.0
22J
7U
7JO
3ZB
64.1
3.8*
20.8
3td
71^
-•• y. .;.• iiO:-.. ::
18.5
:;•:•:.: ':.•••,. • 11&:. :?:
34.4
5^7
OJ366
0.00953
.:::::. . :
-------
TABLE3-2
MICROBOARD ALDEHYDES/KETONES AVERAGE EMISSIONS SUMMARY
Aldehyde/KetoBa EBIWOB*
CONCENTRATION, ^g/dscm*
FORMALDEHYDE
ACETALDEHYDE
ACROLEIN
ACETONE
PROPION ALDEHYDE
CROTONALDEHYDE
n -BUTYRALDEHYDE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
BENZALDEHYDE
ISOVALERALDEHYDE
VALERALDEHYDE
o-TOLUALDEHYDE
m/p-TOLUALDEHYDE
HEXALDEHYDE
2^ -DIMETHYL BENZALDEHYDE
CONCENTRATION, pp» dry by voUme
FORMALDEHYDE
ACETALDEHYDE
ACROLEIN
ACETONE
PROPION ALDEHYDE
CROTONALDEHYDE
n -BUTYRALDEHYDE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
BENZALDEHYDE
ISOVALERALDEHYDE
VALERALDEHYDE
o-TOLUALDEHYDE
m/p -TOLUALDEHYDE
HEXALDEHYDE
2,5-DIMETHYL BENZALDEHYDE
EMISSION RATE, IWkr
FORMALDEHYDE
ACETALDEHYDE
ACROLEIN
ACETONE
PROPION ALDEHYDE
CROTONALDEHYDE
n- BUTYRALDEHYDE
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
BENZALDEHYDE
ISOVALERALDEHYDE
VALERALDEHYDE
o-TOLUALDEHYDE
m/p-TOLUALDEHYDE
HEXALDEHYDE
2.5-DIMETHYL BENZALDEHYDE
Core
EFBOvdet
13.900
6,060
1,960
7360
882
841
2,450
761
9,810
1,510
1,160
870
2,170
1.840
435
11.1
330
0.839
327
0.365
0289
0.816
0254
222
0.418
0324
0.174
0.435
0.442
0.0783
2.00
0.872
0280
1.14
0.128
0,123
0355
0.110
1.41
0216
0.168
0.126
0311
0266
0.0640
Sufece
EFBOwdet
967
265
42.0
662
20.1
42.1
96.7
<17.1
422
55.8
203
33.8
236
314
74.8
0.775
0.145
0.0180
0275
0.00830
0.0145
0.0323
< .00570
0.0956
0.0156
0.0660
0.00676
0.0473
0.0754
0.0134
0.177
0.0487
0.00774
0.122
0.00368
0.00776
0.0178
< 0.00313
0.0775
0.0103
0.0374
0.00621
0.0434
0.0578
0.0138
Slack 11
30300
375
125
765
<7.58
493
125
182
111
110
174
10.9
61.5
399
18.5
243
0205
0.0536
0317
< 0.00314
0.0169
0.0416
0.0305
0.0251
0.0307
0.0486
0.00218
0.0123
0.0959
0.00332
0.851
0.0105
0.0359
0.0209
< 0.000226
0.00139
0.00348
0.000493
0.00308
0.00305
0.00480
0.000308
0.00173
0.0109
0.000531
SUck 12
29,900
380
88.6
684
<4.77
28.8
993
17.8
104
96.8
156
5.14
57.9
390
14.9
23.9
0207
0.0380
0284
<0231
0.00991
tf.0331
0.0135
0.0236
0.0271
0.0436
0.00391
0.0116
0.0936
0.00268
124
0.0158
0.00369
0.0284
< 0.000195
0.00120
0.00413
0.000740
0.00433
0.00403
0.00648
0.000214
0.00241
0.0162
0.000622
Suck 13
27,600
333
75.8
487
<835
37.9
102
16.9
105
86.1
134
5.44
46.4
320
353
22.1
0.182
0.0325
0202
< 0.00346
0.0130
0.0339
0.00565
0.0237
0.0241
0.0376
0.00108
0.00929
0.0768
0.00634
1.00
0.0121
0.00275
0.0176
< 0.000309
0.00137
0.00368
0.000617
0.00381
0.00313
0.00487
0.000200
0.00170
0.01160
0.00127
Suck 14
6,520
153
37.6
223
<532
27.6
603
12.9
47.4
42.6
57.9
4.10
22.4
122
10.7
j
522
0.0836
0.0161
0.0926
< 0.0022
0.00950
0.0201
0.00430
0.0107
0.00190
0.0162
0.000821
0.00449
0.0292
0.00192
0372
0.00880
0.00215
0.0127
< 0.000322
0.00160
0.00348
0.000744
0.00270
0.00245
0.00333
0.000231
0.00128
0.00697
0.000620
Suck 15
6,410
159
46.7
250
< 1.03
40.6
80.6
13.9
51.9
51.9
77.4
226
24.7
133
938
5.14
0.0865
0.0200
0.104
< 0.000427
0.0140
0.0269
0.00465
0.0117
0.0145
0.0216
0.000327
0.00495
0.0319
0.00168
0.376
0.00939
0.00274
0.0146-
< 0.0000599
0.00240
0.00476
0.000824
0.00317
0.00306
0.00458
0.000135
0.00145
0.00783
0.000553
3-3
-------
Review of the individual impinger analyses for run MDFCO-M0011-2 indicates that the first
and second impinger samples may have been mislabeled during the recovery or analysis
phase. Similar data anomalies exist for runs MDFP3-M0011-2, MBP11-M0011-1, and
MBCR14-M0011-2.
Comparison of the individual impinger analyses demonstrates no significant breakthrough
of any of the compounds of interest except acetone and acetaldehyde. Measured quantities
of all compounds in the final impingers were near or at reported minimum detection limits.
Acetone and acetaldehyde did not exhibit the same trend of impinger collection efficiency.
It appears that EPA Method 0011 (M0011) may be inappropriate for quantifying acetone
and acetaldehyde emissions from these sources. Acetone values from the EPA Method 0030
(VOST) runs for the MDF Cyclone Outlet, Surface EFB, and Core EFB averaged 0.009,'
j
0.28, and 3.54 pounds per hour, respectively. Acetone values determined by M0011
averaged 0.0356, 0.12, and 1.14 pounds per hour at the same three locations, respectively.
Acetone is a common laboratory solvent and is also used to recover particulate and PM10
trains. MOO 11 has not been validated for acetone and previous sampling efforts under other
EPA Work Assignments have reported problems with the use of MOO 11 to quantify acetone
emissions. Although precautions were taken to prevent contamination, there is a possibility
of field or laboratory contamination.
For the runs performed at the Core EFB Outlet, there were significant levels of
acetaldehyde in the third impingers. In this case, there is no explanation for carry over. It
is not possible to determine if all the acetaldehyde emissions were collected by the M0011
sample train or if unknown quantities purged through the impingers. M0011 has not been
validated for acetaldehyde.
Since the formaldehyde concentrations at most of the sources were high, the use of three
impingers was needed to insure capture in the train. The formaldehyde catch in the third
impinger was generally less than one percent of the catch in the first impinger.
3-4
-------
The sample containers containing impinger one samples for runs MDFP2-M0011-3 and
MDFP6-M0011-1 were broken in transit to the laboratory for analysis. Therefore, for MDF
Press Stacks 2 and 6, the emission results for these runs were not reported.
3.2.2 Paniculate and Condensibles
An EPA Method 5/202 (M5/202) sample train was used to determine the particulate and
condensible particulate emissions at the core and surface EFB inlets and the MDF cyclone
outlet. The particulate and condensible particulate emissions are summarized in Table 3-3.
Tables 3-21 through 3-23 summarize the individual runs.
For run MDFCO-M5/202-3, the isokinetic sampling rate was higher than EPA criteria
allows (100 ± 10%) at 116.1%. This was due to improper sample rate procedures:
Sampling at over-isokinetic rates should give results that are lower than actual if large
particles (aerodynamically greater than 50 microns) are present in the gas stream. The
sampling location is located downstream from a cyclone and, therefore the particle size
should be less than 50 microns. The bias attributable to sampling over-isokinetic should be
negligible. The filterable emissions that were reported are probably lower than actual
emissions by less than five percent. The condensible particulate emissions are not affected
and are judged correct as reported.
The water residue blank determination was greater than allowed for EPA Method 5
particulate samples. Therefore, the inorganic particulate samples were not corrected for
water residue.
••--
An additional test run was done at the surface and core EFB inlets to coincide with
additional PM10 runs performed at the EFB outlets.
32.3
The PM10 and condensible particulate emissions from the MDF press stacks and all
microboard test locations were determined using an EPA Method 201 A/202 sample train.
The PMjQ emissions from the MDF cyclone outlet were determined using an EPA Method
3-5
-------
201A constant rate sample train. The PM10 and condensible participate emissions are
summarized in Table 3-3. Individual run summaries are presented in Tables 3-24 through
3-35.
EPA Method 201A requires a maximum of 12 sample points be used. Due to cyclonic flow
being present at the MDF cyclone outlet, 24 sample points were used in an attempt to
insure a more accurate flow determination.
For all runs performed at the MDF Press Stacks, the PM10 sizing device (including in-stack
filters) could not be positioned in the stack on the first two sampling points of each traverse
axis due to the length of the cyclone head. This sampling limitation was also encountered
on the first run of the microboard press stacks. For the second and third runs performed
at the microboard press stacks and the runs performed at the microboard cooling room
stacks, the third point on each traverse axis was sampled three repetitions so that the sizing
device was inside the stack for the duration of the tests.
If the PM10 head is not in the stack during sampling, there is the potential for the
condensible gases to collect on the filter since it is at a cooler temperature than the flue gas.
This is a significant issue when the stack gases are much hotter than the ambient
temperature. For the MDF press stacks 2 and 3, the temperature difference was
approximately 30° F. The temperature difference for MDF stacks 4, 5, and 6 was
approximately 10° F. For the microboard stacks the temperature difference was about 20°
F. Due to this small temperature differential, the impact on the data quality is insignificant.
After review of the data for stack 11, 12 and 13, there is no disceraable difference in the
results for the two different sampling approaches at these locations. Any variabilities
associated with the results are probably due to the imprecision of the sample recovery and
gravimetric techniques of EPA Method 201A in analysis of paniculate catches that are less
than 50 milligrams. The MDF Press locations are very similar to the Microboard Press
locations and thus there is probably no significant bias of the results for the MDF Press.
3-6
-------
TABLE 3-3
PM10& TOTAL PARTICULAR AVERAGE EMISSIONS SUMMARY
SAMPLING LOCATION
HDF "
,imitff|(tte^i^tof ,
jpffiSS
Stack 2
Stack3
Stack 4'
Stack 5
Stacks
ttm»t>Att>
Surface EFB
Inlet
Outlet
BSfifcSB
Inlet
Outlet
t>m® .
Stack 11
Stack 12
Stack 13
Stack 14 ""••
Stack 15""'
FILTERABLE (PM1O)
gralna/DSCF*
000270
0.00362
0.00404
0.00739
0.000119
0.000155
O.O0361
00240
0.000600
0000747
0.000537
). 0001 08
') .0002 12
pound Air
226
0378
0424
0 123
00580
00410
1.50
796
00427
0.0348
0.0471
0.0144
0.0300
FILTERABLE fM10) +
NON- EXTRACT ABLE CONDENSIBLES
gralna/DSCF*
O.O0912"
OO0757
OO209
000159
0000350
000147
0,00406 ""
000630
00388 •"•
00587
0.00199
000268
0.00217
0000740
000031B
pound/hr
723"
0747
2.22
0265
0.410
0389
1 64 ""
395
10.0"'*
196
0.143
0.132
0.193
00969
00450
FILTERABLE f>M1O)'+ NON- EXTRACT ABLE
ft EXTRACT ABLE CONDENSIBLES
I
gralns/DSCF*
0.0110 "
0.00826
0.0219
00218
000916
000227
0.0151 ""
0.00734
008O3 ""
00773
0.00282
0.00321
0.00279
0000847
0.000379
pound/hr
8.76 "
0.815
2.33
0369
0.441
0.600
6.07 ""
4.59
220""
258
0202
0149
0.247
0.113
00536
TOTAL PAHTICUIATE
(Induda PM10)
gralna/DSCF*
0.0254 "'
0.0156
0.0302
0.002S2
0.00165
0.00361
00618
00113
0.196
0.132
000359
0.00595
0.00364
0.00145
0.00112
pound/hr
20.0 •"
1.54
320
0.480
0.794
1.01
248
703
53.4
44.6
0.258
0.274
0.324
0.194
0.159
-U
6d 201A PM 10 R.oi
il«l< * Co eoiiklt Pire It Rm
alm* CooJ«iiibl« Pttc, t« R«n - Ucludiiie«iikl« p.rdc.lilt. Tk
-------
The sample train from run MBCLO-M201 A/202-1 did not meet acceptable post-test leak
check requirements. An additional run was performed to replace this run. At the
conclusion of run MBSLO-M201A/202-1, the filter was observed to be wet and could not
be adequately recovered. An additional run was performed to replace the run.
For runs MBSLO-M201A/202-2 and MBCLO-M201 A/202-4, the sample bottle containing
the impingers water catch was broken in transit to the laboratory. Therefore, no
condensible emission results are calculated for these runs.
3.2.4 Semivolatile Organics
The semivolatile organic emissions summarized in Table 3-4 were determined using EPA
Method 0010 (MOOiO). Tables 3-36 through 3-38 summarize the individual runs.
Semivolatile organic samples were collected at the cyclone outlet and the core and surface
EFB outlets. Pinenes were the only compounds detected.
For the core EFB outlet, the reported p-cymene mass for run two was non-detectable. For
runs one and three, the total p-cymeme mass collected averaged 1,870 mg. There is no
apparent explanation for this. The results for the other pinene compounds (a-pinene, B-
pinene and a-terpineol) showed good agreement for all three runs.
3.2.5 Volatile Organics
EPA Method 0030 (VOST) was used to determine the vc!•:.,"-. c ^rnikf ii-Ji^'orcX iHe
MDF cyclone outlet and the EFB outlets. The volumetric flow rates used to report emission
rates were obtained from concurrent isokinetic sample runs, laoie 3-5 summarizes me
volatile organic emissions. The individual runs are summanVr! in TiH~s ^-55 through 3-57.
Each VOST run consisted of four pairs of adsorbent tubes. Three of four pairs were
analyzed with the fourth pair archived as a backup. Each pair consisted of a Tenax trap,
followed by a Tenax Charcoal trap. The traps were analyzed individually on the first set of
tubes at each location to determine the tube collection efficiency and breakthrough
3-8
-------
TABLE 3-4
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC HAPS AVERAGE EMISSIONS SUMMARY
, , SiiMTVOtA'I^tB OKG.VNIC If APS EM1SS JONS „
•.- *-f>vr^">\ .%&.'.?.?§&.?:..••.?:•'::•'• '•"•' % ".X,™.., ..., *^Xv.s\v
;;; :P^CYMENEv; :.; ; , . :
fig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
pounds per hour
A-PINEKE
/ig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
pounds per hour
B-PINENE
>ig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
pounds per hour
A-TERPINEOL
>ig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
pounds per hour
WUOF
„ ^cr
-------
TABLE 3-5
VOLATILE ORGANIC HAPS AVERAGE EMISSIONS SUMMARY
^r'Y01&mBO»«A»lCJB«»S SmSSBOKSPy
W /S •*• -S-tAfSy?-,^ A •. V { f "' - *m <, ^c-^X-Jt-N-j ~ •• "••<•••;. «<««•••'
CONCENTHATIONi//g/dscm*
A-Piaene
B-Pineae
Methyieee Chloride
Trichlorou'uoTometaue
Chlorom ethane-
•• B»-Hexue ••-•-•.-—.•-..
Acetone
: : Jsooctan* :•. :.:.x.,: •:.... :' •
P— Cymene
2-Butanone
1 ,1 .1 "-Trichioroethane
Chloroform
Styrena
m— /p— Xylene
Bromometnane
Cumene (isopropylbenzene)
Carbon Disulfide
lodo methane
o— Xytene
CONCENTRATION, ppb by;votume. Dry
A-Pinene
B-Piaene
Methylene Chloride
Trichtorofluorometiane
Chloromethane
B-Hexane
Acetone
leooctane
P— Cymene
• Toluene
2— Sutanone
1 ,1 ,1 — Trichloroethane
Chloroform
Styrene
m— /p— Xylene
Bro 1 1 lu i He thane
Cumene (isopropylbenzene)
Carbon Disulfide
Bromodichloromethane
Benzene
lodomethane
o— Xylene
EMISSION HATE. Lb/Hr
A — Pinene
B-Pineae
Methylene Chloride
Trich lorofluorometh IB e
Chloromethane
B — Hexanc
Acetone
laooctane
P— Cymene
Toluene
2-Butanone
1 ,1 ,1 -Trichloroathane
Chloroform
Styrane
m— /p— Xylene
Bro mo methane
Cumene (isopropylbenzene)
Carbon Disulfide
Bromodichloromethane
Benzene
lodomethane
o- Xylene
MBX CYCJ&KSttCexIJBrr
•* v^^-JJ«W'^X«J^' XAC--^-«^'v *•• V^-X^S v^C*.
146
I4S
71.0
44.2
34.7
314 •:.:
26J
: ••• 14S --:-..-•-
4.06
" " 3.67
2.62
2D9
1.90
1.04
1.03
0575
0.924
0351
_— —
_- ._
25.7
26J
20.1
7.74 .
16J
9.05
11.0
3.05
0.729
0^57
0.875
0376
0385
0.252
0.247
0:253
0.203
0.108
— __
—— —
_—_
0.0484
0.0490
0.0234
0.0149
0.0116
0.0109
0.00884
i0.00489
0.00135
0.00123
0.000882
0.000697
0.000614
0.000364
0.000364
0.000340
0.000311
0.000113
___
'S^KFACB JJPB OCfll^r;
«".-x^«- -'>*NN x^s-^-x-x •«-,_« •<'<•• '*••• ^ •^«"s
27.600
" , 10.400
153
0.268
644
0.268
1J60
'.. •-., •:-•-. • : O268 : .•
104
•-.- •'.•..-.^ . '-,. 628
— — —
— —— ' ••'
—
— — — •
10.2
— — .
— —
—
— —
4,870
1^20
433
0.0498
307
0.(W48
646
-0.0534- ' :
18.6
16.4
___ . •
_
._^_
231
: .:-» — — .
. .-^_— . -
___
. ___-
___
___
5.29
197
0.0297
0.0000516
0.125
0.0000516
0.297
: 0.00005 16 :: :
0.0200
0.0118
:
• • :— — _. .. :•
' ' _.__ .
0.00193
_
___
___
— — —
:e_•<•.
1 4.63
^ ii.4 •
4&0
— •
130
— — — •
105
14.1
-19.4: "
17,500
9,410;
38.7
: . . •-.,-.•.•-
6.94
— — —
7470
0.604
169
352
9.59
._— —
0.931
3J7
109
•—— — ••
26.0
:-:— —
___
323
2,40
4.41
19.4
10.4
0.0268
- ' :r - •...::; K. \
0.00266
. .• — «~- : ' • '
334
; S0,000528:-
0.184
:•--••••:: O^fii::
0.000524
• • - •. :;. ."••• .
C.i^ZST "^
0.0931
,.-.-. __
0.0252
• .. : _„_
0.0191 .„
0.00258
0.00173
3-10
-------
potential. All other tubes were analyzed as pairs as cited in the method. The sample flow
rate and total gas volume was based on the total hydrocarbon (THC) concentrations
measured in the field using Method 25A (flame ionization detector). Any locations with
high concentration THC were sampled at an appropriately lower flow rate, thus yielding a
smaller volume of sample. Despite adjustments in the sample volume, there were instances
when the amount of analyte detected exceeded the effective calibration range. Data
reported in those instances should be considered estimates.
At all locations the most abundant compounds detected were a-pinene and B-pinene. For
the MDF cyclone outlet, the pinenes were detected at levels above the upper calibration
range of 1.0 microgram (wg). Pinene values for the MDF cyclone outlet (MDFCO) ranged
from 0.8 to 2.2 /^g. The reported quantities for other compounds of interest were well
within calibration range. Individual tube analysis of pair 1A demonstrated there was no
breakthrough of any compounds detected at significant levels from the MDFCO. The
surrogate recoveries for all MDFCO samples were within method requirement.
Concentrations reported at the MDFCO for a- and 6-pinenes are considered conservative
estimates.
Samples collected at the Microboard surface layer EFB outlet (MBSLO) and the
Microboard core layer EFB outlet (MBCLO) were analyzed using a "high level" VOST
analysis procedure. This decision was made after saturation levels were detected for a- and
6- pinenes using the standard low level VOST analytical technique for MBSLO-1A (invalid
run). The QA/QC criteria for calibration and surrogate recoveries using the high level
technique have not been clearly established. All data reported using this procedure should
be considered estimates.
For the lower level pinene concentrations observed at the MDFCO, the VOST results are
similar to the M0010 (semivolatile) results. For the higher pinene concentrations observed
at the surface MBSLO and core MBCLO outlets, the MOO 10 sample train is considered to
be more accurate for quantifying these compounds. It appears that at high concentration
levels the VOST tubes become saturated and may not effectively trap these compounds.
3-11
-------
22.6 CEM
The carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, and total hydrocarbon emissions were determined
using EPA Methods 10, 7E, and 25A, respectively. The total hydrocarbon emissions are
summarized in Table 3-6. Table. 3-7 summarizes the carbon monoxide and nitrogen oxides
emissions. Individual CEM runs are summarized in Tables 3-39 through 3-53. The carbon
monoxide, nitrogen oxides, and total hydrocarbon (THC) emission rates were determined
using the air flow rates from concurrent isokinetic runs. Additional THC testing was done
at the microboard press stacks 16, 17, and 18. The air flow rates and moisture were not
measured. The THC concentrations are presented in parts per million (ppm) wet expressed
as propane and are summarized in Table 3-54.
To respond to questions raised by WEYCO and NCASI regarding probe, filter box and the
sample line temperatures, a series of tests were conducted to determine the effect of
variation of temperature on sample integrity. These tests were conducted during the first
'two days of testing on the MDF press vents on 11 and 12 September 1992.
Tests were run at three probe and filter box temperature conditions:
• below the stack temperature;
• above the stack temperature; and
• at approximately the stack temperature,
The sample lines were self-regulating and remained in the temperature range of 225-250
degrees Fahrenheit.
•
Condition 1: (equipment temperature maintained below stack temperature) resulted in the
fonnatiorr of condensation in the probe, filter, and filter housing; The corresponding THC
concentrations were observed to be lower than those concentrations determined for higher
equipment temperatures. These results verified the fact that organic species were
condensing from the gas stream and not reaching the FID instrumentation.
Condition 2: (equipment temperature maintained above stack temperature) resulted in
contamination of the sample line. It is believed that the higher temperature caused
3-12
-------
TABLE 3-6
AVERAGE TOTAL HYDROCARBON EMISSIONS SUMMARY
SAMPLING LOCATION
*s" 'MOF1^^^^^^^^^^^-^^
f^^Q^jJ^^v^lllB^^^L^
%8ss vs.' *• '" •• •"• •w*e4WX**f*<*&*is.s- •• «• swXv. w.s ^.s A -,-. \w vy-v^.
Wv^K^|*f'|^g^x^s^^NN%N>xX^^
Stack 2
Stacks
Stack 4
Stacks
Stack 6
MICBOBOAftD <. \
-v, .\, r. StirfiaiiB: SPB1" - - - - - ^ ^
Inlet
Outlet
- -cowe^jiTr:^ T:;I
Inlet
Outlet
r,"9Besa~ -,- ' i
Stack 1 1
Stack 12
Stack 13
Stack 14
Stack 15
Stack 16
Stack 17
Stack 18
CONCENTRATION
Parts Per Minion
Wet*
10.8
19.6
28.2
4.2
2.8
5.6
39.4
30.4
376
275
44.2
42.4
33.0
14.0
13.0
32.3
21.9
31.6
Dry
12.0
20.3
29.1
4.31
2.85
5.78
46.0
35.1
490
352
45.8
43.8
34.1
14.5
12.9
Milligrams Per
Dry Std;Cu. Meter**
21.9
37.2
53.3
7.90
5.22
10.6
84.2
64.4
900
646
83.9
80.2
62.5
26.5
23.6
Emission Bate
Ib/hr
7.62
1.57
2.50
0.574
1.07
1.09
14.2
11.9
108
93.4
2.33
3.34
2.28
1.47
1.34
* As Propane
** 68 Degrees F — 29.92 Inches of Mercury (Hg).
21-Apr-W
3-13
-------
TABLE 3-7
CARBON MONOXIDE & NITROGEN OXIDES AVERAGE EMISSIONS SUMMARY
SAMPLING LOCATION
Surface EFB Outlet
Core EFB Outlet
CARBON MONOXIDE
Concentration
mg/dscm*
120
250
ppm.dry
100
210
Emission Rate
Pound/Hour
22
0
36
irtTROGEN OXiDES
Concentration
mg/dscm?
70
110
ppm.dry
37
56
Emission Rate,
ytbUini'^FIotir.-:.
13
16
rnilligrarns per dry standard cubic meter at 68 Degrees F — 29.92 Inches of Mercury (Hg).
-------
volatilization of some organic compounds that passed through the filter and condensed on
the walls of the sample line. This contamination was observed during successive runs.
Condition 3: (equipment temperature maintained at the stack temperature) was determined
to yield the most reliable test results. None of the problems associated with the other two
conditions were observed. Tests run with the probe and filter assembly at or near to the
source temperature were determined to be the most reliable and representative way to
sample the sources at the Weyerhaeuser facility. On all tests conducted after September
12, 1992 the probe and filter assembly were maintained at or near the source temperatures.
32.1 Cyclonic Flow at the MDF Cyclone Sampling Location
In accordance with Section 2.4 of Method 1, the MDF cyclone outlet was checked for the
presence of cyclonic flow. This test confirmed the presence of cyclonic flow patterns that
exceeded the allowable rotation angle a of 20°. Since there is no EPA approved procedure
for performing isokinetic and PM10 sampling under these conditions, the following strategy
was supplied by the EPA Observer on-site in consultation with other EPA/EMB authorities.
The yaw angles for each sample point were measured and recorded prior to testing using
an angle finder and the alignment procedure described in Section 2.4 of Method 1. The
pitot tubes were aligned parallel to the flow at each point and the velocity pressure (AP) was
measured. The adjusted axial velocity pressure was calculated by multiplying the cosine of
the yaw angle times the measured AP. The pitot tube was then aligned parallel to the stack
walls (straight up and down in the usual configuration) and the resultant velocity pressures
(corrected for rotation angle a) for each point were used to perform isokinetic sampling.
3-15
-------
TABLE 3-8
ALDEHYDES/KETONES TESTS SUMMARY
MDF Cyclone Outlet (DB)
MDFCO-MOOll-1 MDFCO-MOUU-^ Mi!
Test Date 9/25/92 9/25/92
Run SUrt Time
Run Finish Time
Teat Train Pin meters:
Volume of DryGai Sampled, SCF*
Percent Isokiaetic
Flue On Pamneten:
Temperature, Degree* F
Volumetric Air Flow Rate*
SCFM', Dry
ACFM, Wet
ALDE./KETONES EMISSION RESULTS:
FORMALDEHYDE
jig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ACETALDEHYDE
Mg per dry fid. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilogram* per hour
pound* per hour
ACROLEIN
Mg per dry ltd. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ACETONE
fig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
PROPIONALDEH YDE
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
CROTONALDEH YDE
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
n - BUTYRALDEH YDE
/ig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
METH YL ETH YL KETONE
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
1326
1500
46373
104.7
158
87,000
113,000
35,600
28.5
5.258
11.591
375
0.205
0.0555
0.122
51.8
0.0222
0.00765
0.0169
155
0.0644
0.0230
0.0506
305
0.0126
0.00450
0.00992
49.5
0.0170
0.00731
0.0161
76.1
0.0254
0.0113
0.0248
155
0.0516
0.0228
0.0504
1625
1741
47326
97.9
155
94,900
121,000
38,800
31.1
6.254
13.788
167
0.0912
0.0270
0.0594
45.5
0.0195
0.00734
0.0162
61.2
0.0254
0.00987
0.0218
25.4
0.0105
0.00409
0.00902
50.7
0.0174
0.00818
0.0180
61.9
0.0207
0.00999
0.0220
151
0.0503
0.0243
00536
9/25/92
1843
2018
48.553
99.2
152
96,100
123,000
34,900
28.0
5.697
12J60
465
0.254
0.0760
0.168
72.7
0.0312
0.0119
0.0262
96.0
0.0398
0.0157
0.0346
28.4
0.0117
0.00463
0.0102
48.0
0.0165
0.00784
0.0173
81.5
0.0272
0.0133
0.0293
187
0.0624
0.0305
00673
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
155
92,700
119,000
36,400
29.2
5.74
12.6
336
0.183
0.0528
0.116
56.7
0.0243
0.00896
0.0197
104
0.0432
0.0162
0.0356
28.1
0.0116
0.00441
0.00972
49.4
0.0170
0.00778
0.0171
73.2
0.0244
0.0115
0.0254
164
0.0547
0.0259
0 0571
ili-MUtf C*Us> W-jifbl
. P (TM Q - - ».M )•.
3-16
-------
TABLE 3-1 (coitiaud)
ALDEHYDES/KETONES TESTSSUMMARY
MDF Cyclone Outlet (DB)
MDFCO-M0011-1 MDFCO-M0011-2 MDFCO-M0011-3
BENZALDEHYDE
pg per dry ltd. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ISOVALERALDEH YDE
jig per dry sld. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
VALERALDEHYDE
Mg per dry ltd. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
o-TOLU ALDEHYDE
j»g per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
m/p-TOLU ALDEHYDE
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
HEXALDEHYDE
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
2^-DIMETHYL BENZALDEHYDE
ng per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
54.8
0.0124
0.00810
0.0179
44.9
0.0126
0.00664
0.0146
503
0.0140
0.00743
0.0164
25.9
0.005 IS
0.00383
0.00843
123
0.0245
0.0181
0.0399
60.2
0.0145
0.00889
0.01%
838
0.00150
0.00124
0.00273
85.1
0.0193
0.0137
0.0302
403
0.0113
0.00650
0.0143
45.5
0.0127
0.00734
0.0162
20.9
0.00418
0.00337
0.00743
145
0.0287
0.0233
0.0515
5L5
0.0124
0.00830
0.0183
1L9
0.00214
0.00193
0.00424
61.8
0.0140
0.0101
0.0223
60.4
0.0169
0.00986
0.0217
66.9
0.0187
0.0109
0.0241
11.6
0.00233
0.00190
0.00419
24.0
0.00480
0.00392
0.00864
90.9
0.0218
0.0148
0.0327
9.45
0.00170
0.00154
0.00340
Average
67.2
0.0152
0.0106
0.0234
48.5
0.0136
0.00766
0.0169
54.2
0.0152
0.00856
0.0189
19.5
0.00390
0.00303
0.00668
973
0.0193
0.0151
0.0333
67.5
0.0162
0.0107
0.0235
9.91
0.00178
0.00157
0.00346
ilmiM Cibt W.i,ll
. F(»Q ».«!•.
3-17
-------
TABLE 3-9
ALDEHYDES/KETONES TESTS SUMMARY
MDF Pre»i Suck 2 (WIW-2)
Tat Date
Run Start Tine
RUB Finish Time
Tett Train Parameters:
Volume of Dry Gas Sampled, SCF*
Percent Itokinetic
Flue Gas Parameters:
Temperature, Degrees F
Volumetric Air Flow Rates
SCFM-. Dry
ACFM, Wet
MDFP2-M0011-1
9/11/92
1928
2050
39.08
10U
118
11,207
12,787
MDFP2-M0011-2 MDFP2-M0011-3 Averaee
9/12/92
848
1021
45344
99.2
111
11,444
1^586
9/12/92 N/A
1211 N/A
1427 N/A
46.027 N/A
993 N/A
115 115
11,604 11,418
12,814 12,729
ALDE./KETONES EMISSION RESULTS:
FORMALDEHYDE
Mg per dry ltd. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ACETALDEHYDE
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ACROLEIN
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ACETONE
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
PROPIONALDEHYDE
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
CROTONALDEHYDE
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
n-BUTYRALDEHYDE
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
Mg per dry sld. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
Estimated catch weight.
. All catch weights are less than the minimum
* 58 Deg. F (20 C) - - 29.92 In. Mercury
55500
44.5
1.06
233
709
0387
0.0135
0.0298
79.5
0.0341
0.00151
0.00334
210
0.0869
0.00399
0.00880
50.6
0.0210
0.000964
0.00212
55.1
0.0189
0.00105
0.00231
142
0.0473
0.00270
0.00596
93.1
0.0311
0.00177
0.00391
detection limit (MDL).
47100
37.8
0.916
2.02
376
0.205
0.00731
0.0161
35.8
0.0154
0.000697
0.00154
262
0.109
0.00509
0.0112
1,56
0.000543
0.0000303
0.0000668
125
0.0431
0.00244
0.00537
208
0.0694
0.00404
0.00891
24.1
0.00805
0.000469
0.00103
Value presented calculated using
(continued next page)
51300
41.1
0.9S7
2.18
543
0.2%
0.0104
0.0230
57.7
0.0247
0.00111
0.00244
236
0.0977
O.OM54
0.0100
26.1
0.0 108
0.000515
0.00108
90.1
0.0310
0.00175
0.00384
175
0.0584
0.00337
0.00743
58.6
0.0196
0.00112
0.00247
1/2 MDL for each catch weight.
3-18
-------
TABLE 3-9 (coitiued)
ALDERYDES/KETONES TESTS SUMMARY
Microboard Press Stack 2 (WIW-2)
MDFP2-M0011-1
BENZALDEHYDE
>ig per dry ltd. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pound* per hour
ISOVALERALDEHYDE
/ig per dry sld. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
VALERALDEHYDE
jig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
o-TOLUALDEHYDE
/ig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
m/p-TOLUALDEHYDE
^g per dry std. cubic m eter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
HEXALDEHYDE
jig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ZS-DlMETHYL BENZALDEHYDE
fig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
Estimated catch weight.
30.7
0.00697
0.000585
0.00129
73.2
0.0204
0.00139
0.00307
82.2
0.0230
0.00157
0.00345
29.8
0.00597
0.000568
0.00125
56.9
0.0114
0.00108
0.00239
1283
0.0308
0.00244
0.00539
37.9
0.00681
0.000723
0.00159
All catch weights are less than the minimum detection limit (MDL).
• 68 Deg. F (20 C) - - 29.92 In. Mercury
MDFP2-M0011-2 MDFP2-M0011-3 Averaee
29.6
0.00671
0.000575
0.00127
130
0.0363
0.00253
0.00558
165
0.0461
0.00321
0.00708
14.0
0.00281
0.000273
0.000601
184
0.0368
0.00357
0.00788
102
0.0245
0.00198
0.00437
206
0.0369
0.00400
0.00881
30.2
0.00684
0.000580
0.00128
102
0.0284
0.00196
0.00432
124
0.0346
0.00239
0.00527
21.9
0.00439
0.000420
0.000930
120
0.0241
0.00233
0.00513
115
0.0277
0.00221
0.00488
122
0.0219
0.00236
0.00520
Value presented calculated using 1/2 MDL for each catch weight.
3-19
-------
TABLE 3-10
ALDEHYDES/KETONES TESTS SUMMARY
MDF Press Stick 3 (WIW-1)
MDFP3-M0011-1
Test Date
Run Surt Time
RUD Finish Time
Test Train Parameters:
Volume of Dry Gas Sampled, SCF*
Percent Iiokinetic
Flue Gas Parameter:
Temperature, Degrees F
Volumetric Air Flow Rates
SCFM*. Dry
ACFM, Wet
ALDE./KETONES EMISSION RESULTS:
FORMALDEHYDE
/ig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ACETALDEHYDE
jig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ACROLEIN
/ig per dry std. cubic meter'
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ACETONE
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
PROPIONALDEHYDE
fig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
CROTONALDEHYDE
fig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
n- BUTYRALDEHYDE
/ig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
/ig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
* 68 Deg. F (20 C) - - 29.92 In. Mercury
9/11/92
1928
2050
44.324
1033
120
12386
14,025
63900
51.2
134
2.96
421
0.230
0.00887
0.0196
163
0.0697
0.00342
0.00754
110
0.0456
0.00231
0.00510
18.3
0.00759
0.000386
0.000850
43.8
0.0151
0.000922
0.00203
128
0.0428
0.00270
0.00595
146
0.0486
0.00307
0.00676
MDFP3-M0011-2 MDFP3-M0011-3
9/12/92
848
1009
44.366
106.0
114
12,106
13,497
72400
58.0
1.49
3.28
497
0.271
0.0102
0.0226
141
0.0604
0.00290
0.00639
279
0.116
0.00575
0.0127
85.2
0.0353
0.00175
0.00386
39.0
0.0134
0.000802
0.00177
80.4
0.0268
0.00165
0.00365
47.0
0.0157
0.000966
0.00213
(continued next page)
9/12/92
1211
1410
44.571
102.4
119
12^79
14,111
61100
49.0
131
2.88
565
0308
0.0121
0.0266
83.2
0.0357
0.00178
0.00392
87.9
0.0365
0.00188
0.00414
33.3
0.0138
0.000711
0.00157
46.7
0.0161
0.00100
0.00220
105
0.0352
0.00225
0.00497
39.6
0.0132
0.000847
0.00187
Average
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
118
12357
13,878
65800
52.7
138
3.04
494
0.270
0.0104
0.0229
129
0.0553
0.00270
0.00595
159
0.0660
0.00331
0.00730
45.6
0.0189
0.000962
0.00212
43.2
0.0148
0.000910
0.00200
105
0.0349
0.00222
0.00488
77.5
0.0258
0.00163
0.00359
3-20
-------
TABLE 3-10 (continued)
ALOEHYDES/KETONES TESTS SUMMARY
Microboard Pros Stack 3 (WIW -1)
MDFP3-M0011-1 MDFP3-M0011-2 MDFP3-M0011-3
BENZALDEHYDE
ttg per dry std- cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ISOVALERALDEHYDE
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by.volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
VALERALDEHYDE
/if, per dry ltd. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
o-TOLUALDEHYDE
jig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
m/p-TOLUALDEHYDE
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
HEXALDEHYDE
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
2.5 -DIMETHYL BENZALDEHYDE
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
* 68 Deg. F (20 C) - - 29.92 In. Mercury
22.3
0.00506
0.000469
0.00103
55.8
0.0156
0.001 17
0.00259
177
0.0494
0.00372
0.00821
110
0.0220
0.00231
0.00510
89.2
0.0179
0.00188
0.00414
122
0.0293
0.00257
0.00566
195
0.0350
0.00411
0.00906
27.9
0.00632
0.000573
0.00126
50.1
0.0140
0.00103
0.00227
62.1
0.0173
0.00128
0.00282
17.5
0.00350
0.000360
0.000794
39.8
0.00796
0.000819
0.00180
92.3
0.0222
0.00190
0.00419
23.1
0.00414
0.000475
0.00105
25.4
0.00575
0.000542
0.00119
60.2
0.0168
0.00129
0.00284
80.8
0.0226
0.00173
0.00381
28.5
0.00571
0.000610
0.00134
59.4
0.0119
0.00127
0.00280
106
0.0255
0.00227
0.00500
38.0
0.00683
0.000813
0.00179
Averaze
25.2
0.00571
0.000530
0.00116
55.4
0.0155
0.00116
0.00257
107
0.0298
0.00224
0.00494
52.0
0.0104
0.00109
0.00241
62.8
0.0126
0.00132
0.00291
107
0.0257
0.00226
0.00495
85.4
0.0153
0.00180
0.00396
3-21
-------
TABLE 3-11
ALDEHYDES/KETONES TESTS SUMMARY
MDF Pros Suck 4 (WIW-S)
Test Dale
Run Start Time
Run Finish Time
Test Train Parameters:
Volume of Dry Gas Sam pled. SCF*
Percent Isokinetic
Flue Gas P trimeters:
Temperature, Degrees F
Volumetric Air Flow Rates
SCFM-, Dry
ACFM, Wet
MDFP4-M0011- 1
9/12/92
1802
1936
44.335
102.6
96
' 17,434
18,58*
MDFP4-M0011-2
9/13/92
938
1132
52.7
101.6
89
20.929
22,007
MDFP4-M0011-3
9/13/92
1248
1420
51.242
1026
97
20,150
21341
Averaee
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
94
19,504
20,712
ALDE./KETONES EMISSION RESULTS:
FORMALDEHYDE
Hg per dry. sld. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
Kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ACETALDEHYDE
>ig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ACROLEIN
fig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ACETONE
/ig per dry sld. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
PROPIONALDEHYDE
^g per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
CROTONALDEHYDE
Mg per dry sld. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
n-BUTYRALDEHYDE
ftg per dry std. cubic m eter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per tour
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
jig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
Estimated Catch Weight.
All catch weights are less than the minimum
*68Deg. F(20C)-- 29.92 In. Mercury
8870
7.11
0.263
0.579
90.8
0.0495
0.00269
0.00593
27.1
0.0116
0.000802
0.00177
105
0.0436
0.00311
0.00687
12.7
0.00528
0.000378
0.000832
31.1
0.0107
0.000920
0.00203
69.3
0.0231
0.00205
0.00453
3.19
0.00155
0.0000944
0.000208
detection limit (MDL).
7230
5.80
0.257
0.567
59.0
0.0322
0.00210
0.00462
24.1
0.0103
0.000858
0.00189
56.3
0.0233
0.00200
0.00441
16.1
0.00666
0.000572
0.00126
39.5
0.0136
0.00141
0.00310
623
0.0208
0.00222
0.00489
3.35
0.000119
0.000263
Values presented calculated
(continued next page)
7980
6.40
0.273
0.602
77.9
0.0425
0.00267
0.00588
20.7
0.00886
0.000708
0.00156
71.0
0.0294
0.00243
0.00536
1.38
0.00037T
0.0000472
0.000104'
42.0
0.0144
0.00144
0.00317
67.5
0.0225
0.00231
0.00510
3.4S
o.oonr
0.000118
0.000260
8030
6.44
0.264
0.583
75.9
0.0414
0.00248
0.00548
24.0
0.0103
0.000789
0.00174
77.5
0.0321
0.00252
0.00555
10.1
0.00417
0.000332
0.000732
37.6
0.0129
0.00126
0.00277
66.4
0.0221
0.00219
0.00484
333
0.00111
0.000110
0.000244
using 1/2 MDL for each catch weight
3-22
-------
TABLE 3-11 (continued)
ALDEHYDES/KETONES TESTS SUMMARY
MDF fiat Stack 4 (WIW-5)
BENZALDEHYDE
jig per dry sld. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilogram* per hour
pounds per hour
ISOVALERALDEHYDE
/ig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
Kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
VALERALDEHYDE
/ig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pouodi per hour
o-TOLUALDEHYDE
/ig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
Kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
m/p-TOLUALDEHYDE
/ig per dry std. cubic meter"
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
HEXALDEHYDE
/ig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
24-DIMETHYL BENZALDEHYDE
/ig per dry sld. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
Estimated Catch Weight.
All catch weights are less than the minimum
• 68 Deg. F (20 C) - - 29.92 In. Mercury
MDFP4-M0011-1
17.5
0.00397
0.000519
0.00114
39.0
0.0109
0.00116
0.00255
66.1
0.0185
0.00196
0.00432
6.37
0.00128
0.000189
0.000416
15.1
0.00303
0.000448
0.000988
117
0.0281
0.00347
0.00765
29.5
0.00529
0.000873
0.00192
detection limit (MDL).
MDFP4-M0011-2
12.7
0.00289
0.000453
0.00100
35.5
0.00992
0.00126
0.00278
583
0.0163
0.00207
0.00457
8.04
0.00161
0.000286
0.000630
8.71
0.00174
0.000310
0.000683
79.7
0.0192
0.00284
0.00625
29.5
0.00529
0.00105
0.00231
Values presented calculated
MDFP4-M0011-3
17.2
0.00391
0.000590
0.00130
42.7
0.0119
0.00146
0.00322
64.8
0.0181
0.00222
0.00489
15.2
0.00303
0.000519
0.00114
11.7
0.00234
0.000401
0.000884
103
0.0247
0.00352
0.00775
28.9
0.00520
0.000991
0.00218
Average
15.8
0.00359
0.000521
0.00115
39.1
0.0109
0.00129
0.00285
63.1
0.0176
0.00208
0.00459
9.87
0.00197
0.000331
0.000729
11.9
0.00237
0.000386
0.000852
99.8
0.0240
0.00328
0.00722
29.3
0.00526
0.000971
0.00214
using 1/2 MDL for each catch weight.
3-23
-------
TABLE 3-12
ALDEHYDES/KETONES TESTS SUMMARY
MDF Press Stack 5 (WTW-3)
Test Date
Run Sun Time
Run Finish Time
Test Train Parameters:
Volume of Dry Gas Sampled, SCF*
Percent Isokiaetic
Flue Gas Parameters:
Temperature, Degrees F
Volumetric Air Flow Rates
SCFM', Dry
ACFM, Wet
ALDE./KETONES EMISSION RESULTS:
FORMALDEHYDE
/ig per drystd. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ACETALDEHYDE
Mg per drystd. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ACROLEIN
/*g per drystd. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ACETONE
Mg per dry ltd. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
PROPIONALDEHYDE
^g per drystd. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
CROTONALDEHYDE
Mg per drystd. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
n - BUTYRALDEH YDE
Mg per drystd. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
METH YL ETH YL KETONE
Mg per drystd. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
9/12/92
1757
1904
50.183
100.4
95
56,600
60,200
7,070
5.67
0.681
1.50
76.0
0.0415
0.00731
0.0161
20.4
0.00875
0.001%
0.00433
73.9
0.0306
0.00711
0.0157
9.2
0.00379
O.OOOS8
0.00194
15.5
0.00532
0.00149
0.00328
59.8
0.0200
0.00576
0.0127
3.52
0.00117
0.000339
0.00075
9/13/92
935
1111
49.171
103.7
87
54,200
. 57,300
5,820
4.66
0.536
1.18
59.6
0.0325
0.00549
0.0121
16.5
0.00708
0.00152
0.00336
63.9
0.0265
0.00589
0.0130
1.44
0.00060
0.000132
0.000292
35.9
0.0123
0.00331
0.00729
58.9
0.0197
0.00543
0.0120
3.59
0.00120
0.000331
0.00073
9/13/92
1246
1420
47.463
101.9
95
53.300
56,500
6,840
5.49
0.620
1.37
65-5
0.0357
0.00593
0.0131
29.8
0.0128
0.00270
0.00594
75.9
0.0315
0.00687
0.0152
11.9
0.00493
0.00108
0.00238
46.9
0.0161
0.00424
0.00936
73.7
0.0246
0.00667
0.0147
4.46
0.00149
0.000404
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
92
54,700
58,000
6.580
5.27
0.612
1-35
67.0
0.0366
0.00625
0.0138
2Z2
0.00953
0.00206
0.00454
7L2
0.0295
0.00662
0.0146
7.50
0.00311
0.000697
0.00154
3iS
0.0113
0.00301
0.00665
64.1
0.0214
0.00595
0.0131
3.86
0.00129
0.000358
j B.O..U4 out
i F
-------
TABLE 3-12
ALDEHYDES/KETONES TESTS SUMMARY
MDF Press Suck 5 (WIW)
MDFP5-M0011-1 MDFP5-M0011-2 MDFP5-M0011-3
BENZALDEHYDE
jig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ISOVALERALDEHYDE
/ig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
VALERALDEHYDE
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
- o-TOLU ALDEHYDE
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
m/p-TOLUALDEHYDE
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
HEXALDEHYDE
>ig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
24-DIMETHYL BENZALDEHYDE
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
21.8
0.00495
0.00210
0.00463
33.1
0.00924
0.00318
0.00702
60.5
0.0169
0.00582
0.0128
14.1
0.00282
0.00135
0.00299
183
0.00366
0.00176
0.00388
102
0.0245
0.00982
0.0216
25J
0.00455
0.00244
0.00537
10.8
0.00244
0.000993
0.00219
39.5
0.0110
0.00364
0.00802
76.8
0.0215
0.00708
0.0156
11.5
0.00230
0.00106
0.00233
17.2
0.00345
0.00159
0.00350
85
0.0205
0.00788
0.0174
46.7
0.00838
0.00430
0.00948
29.8
0.00675
0.00270
0.00594
43.1
0.0121
0.00391
0.00862
75.9
0.0212
0.00687
0.0152
19.3
0.00387
0.00175
0.00386
20.1
0.00402
0.00182
0.00401
118
0.0282
0.0106
0.0235
31.2
0.00561
0.00283
0.00624
Average
20.8
0.00471
0.00193
0.00425
38.6
0.0108
0.00358
0.00789
71.1
0.0199
0.00659
0.0145
15.0
0.00300
0.00139
0.00306
18.5
0.00371
0.00172
0.00380
102
0.0244
0.00945
0.0208
34.4
0.00618
0.00319
0.00703
All uut »(ku .1. fcu
• u o«t Pino-- an i«
•.• h»< (MDL). V.l~-
• MIA* LaMDLIW ••«hMl«h*«tfhl.
3-25
-------
TABLE 3-13
ALDEHYDES/KETONES TESTS SUMMARY
MDF Press Stack 6 (WIW-4)
Test Date
Run Start Time
Run Finish Time
Test Train Parameters:
Volume of Dry Gas Sampled, SCF*
Percent Isokinebc
Flue-Gas Parameters:
Temperature, Degrees F
Volumetric Air Flow Rates
SCFM'.Dry
ACFM,Wet
ALDRyKETONES EMISSION RESU1
FORMALDEHYDE
/ig per dry sld. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ACETALDEHYDE
/ig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ACROLEIN
/ig per dry sld. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ACETONE
/ig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
PROPIONALDEHYDE
/ig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
CROTONALDEHYDE
/ig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
n - BUTYRALDEHYDE
/ig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
/ig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
MLim-Muun-i KT
9/1 V92
1928
2056
48.156
104.5
95
28,800
30,900
,TS;
Sample not analyzed
9/12/92
848
1019
51.99
106.9
88
29,400
31,000
11,900
9.54
0.594
131
95.8
0.0522
0.00478
0.0105
21.1
0.00903
0.00105
0.00232
303
0.126
0.0151
0.0333
0340
O.OOUI4T
0.0000169
ED000374
29.9
0.0103
0.00149
0.00329
245
0.0818
0.0122
0.0270
13.6
0.00453
0.000678
9/12/92
1212
1418
46.808
106.1
95
26,600
28300
14,072
11.3
0.637
1.40
126
0.0687
0.00570
0.0126
28.7
0.0123
0.00130
0.00286
174
0.0723
0.00788
0.0174
0.377
0.000135
0.0000171
0.0000376
26.4
0.00907
0.00119
0.00263
573
0.0191
0.00259
0.00572
10.6
0.00352
0.000478
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
93
283)
30,100
13,000
10.4
0.61!
1.35
111
0.060!
0.00524
0.0116
24.9
0.0107
0.00118
0.00259
238
0.0990
0.0115
0.0254
0359
0.000149
0.0000170
0.0000375
28.1
0.00967
0.00134
0.00296
151
0.0505
0.00741
0.0163
111
0.00403
0.000578
S All click «ci|kO irt ku ck»l tk< •»!••» t
•MD.tP(20C) — 29.S2 U. M.K..7
Imit (MDL).
if 1/2 MDL
3-26
-------
TABLE 3-13
ALDEHYDES/KETONES TESTS SUMMARY
MDF Press Slack 6 (WIW-4)
I MLim-MUUlI-1 m
BENZALDEHYDE Sample not analyzed
jig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ISOVALERALDEHYDE
jig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
VALERALDEHYDE
jig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
o-TOLUALDEHYDE
jig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
m/p-TOLUALDEHYDE
jig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
HEXALDEHYDE
jig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
24-DIMETHYL BENZALDEHYDE
jig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
jm-Muuu-^i —
12.2
0.00277
0.000610
0.00134
26.5
0.00740
0.00132
0.00291
43.5
0.0121
0.00217
0.00478
3.40
0.000680
0.000169
0.000374
163
0.00326
0.000813
0.00179
63.2
0.0152
0.00315
0.00695
19.0
0.00341
0.000949
0.00209
9.8
0.0222
0.000444
0.000978
30.2
0.0843
0.00137
0.00301
62.6
0.0175
-r 0.00283
0.00624
113
0.00226
0.000512
0.00113
21.1
0.00423
0.000956
0.00211
80.0
0.0192
0.00362
0.00798
21.9
0.00393
0.000990
0.00218
11.0
0.0125
0.000527
0.00116
283
0.0459
0.00135
0.00296
53.0
0.0148
0.00250
0.00551
735
0.00147
0.000341
0.000752
18.7
0.00375
0.000885
0.00195
71.6
0.0172
0.00339
0.00746
20.4
0.00367
0.000969
0.00214
iuM Click Wciftt
^Sg All attk nfka in k» lk» t»« •»!••• 4 — T
u| 1/2 MIX.
3-27
-------
TABLE3-14
ALDEHYDES/KETONES TESTS SUMMARY
Surface EFB Outlet (1510)
MBSLO-M0011-1 MBSLO-M0011-2 MBSLO-MU011-3
Test Date
Run Start Tune
Run Finish Time
Test Train Parameters:
Volume of Dry Gas Sam pled, SCF*
Percent Isokinetic
Flue Gas Parameters:
Carbon Dioxide, %
Temperature, Degrees F
Volumetric Air Flow Rates
SCFM'.Dry
ACFM.Wet
ALDE7KETONES EMISSION RESULTS:
FORMALDEHYDE
jig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ACETALDEHYDE
jig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ACROLEIN
jig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ACETONE
jig per dry std.'cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
PROPION ALDEHYDE
jig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
CROTONALDEHYDE
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppra by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
n - BUTYRALDEH YDE
yo mr dry sM, cubic meter*
Ppu* vy wiuuic. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
jig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
9/16/92
1143
1307
50.825
100.4
2.1
226
49,900
74,000
677
0343
0.0574
0.127
181
0.0985
0.0153
0.0337
50.0
0.0214
0.00424
0.00934
547
0227
0.0464
0.102
153
0.00633
0.00129
0.00285
443
0.0153
0.00377
0.00830
101
0.0336
0.00853
0.0188
4.86
0.00162
0.000412
0.000908
9/16/92 9/16/5
1505
1620
48.925
992
2.0
.321
48300
72300
1,700
136
0.140
0308
456
0249
0.0376
0.0829
583
0.0251
0.00482
0.0106
707
0293
0.0583
0.129
35.4
0.0146
0.00292
0.00643
54.9
0.0189
0.00452
0.00997
112
0.0373
0.00923
0.0203
31.0
0.0104
0.00256
9/17/92
859
1016
48255
962
1.9
215
49,400
74300
525
0.421
0.0440
0.0971
159
0.0866
0.0133
0.0294
17.6
0.00753
0.00147
0.00325
732
0304
0.0614
0.135
931
0.00394
0.000798
0.00176
27.1
0.00930
0.00227
0.00501
77.6
0.0259
0.00651
0.0144
15.4
0.00513
0.00129
Average
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
2.0
221
49300
73,600
967
0.775
0.0804
0.177
265
0.145
0.0221
0.0487
42.0
0.0180
0.00351
0.00774
662
0275
0.0554
0.122
20.1
0.00830
0.00167
0.00368
42.1
0.0145
0.00352
0.00776
96.1
0.0321
0.00809
0.0178
17.1
0.00570
0.00142
B*d»f.t«4CiMk
4*«BlM««4 •«* fOp)
3-28
-------
TABLE 3-14 (coatined)
ALDEHYDES/KETONES TESTS SUMMARY
Surface EFB Outlet (1510)
MBSLO-M0011-1 lvltlsLO-MOOll-2 MBSLO-MU011-3
BENZALDEHYDE
H£ per dry ltd. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ISOVALERALDEHYDE
/ig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
VALERALDEHYDE
jig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
o-TOLUALDEHYDE
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
m/p-TOLUALDEHYDE
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
HEXALDEHYDE
>ig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
25-DIMETHYL BENZALDEHYDE
jig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
305
0.0692
0.0258
0.0570
51.4
0.0144
0.00436
0.00960
157
0.0439
0.0133
0.0293
21.5
0.00431
0.00182
0.00402
185
0.0370
0.0157
0.0345
232
0.0557
0.0197
0.0433
493
0.00886
0.00418
0.00921
699
0.159
0.0577
0.127
79.4
0.0222
0.00655
0.0144
210
0.0587
0.0173
0.0382
512
0.0103
0.00423
0.00932
400
0.0800
0.0330
0.0727
362
0.0868
0.0298
0.0658
943
0.0170
0.00780
0.0172
261
0.0592
0.0219
0.0483
36.6
0.0102
0.00307
0.00677
241
0.0673
0.0202
0.0445
285
0.00571
0.00239
0.00528
124
0.0247
0.0104
0.0229
348
0.0837
0.0292
0.0644
805
0.0145
0.00676
0.0149
Average
422
0.0956
0.0351
0.0775
55.8
0.0156
0.00466
0.0103
203
0.0566
0.0169
0.0374
33.8
0.00676
0.00282
0.00621
236
0.0473
0.0197
0.0434
314
0.0754
0.0262
0.0578
74.8
0.0134
0.00624
0.0138
r, lk« ••>••• 4*mb»i in* (MDU Vita*» pr**««*4««k
* U D*g. F (20 Q - - 29.92 It. M*r«vr
3-29
-------
TABLE 3-15
ALDEHYDES/KETONES TESTS SUMMARY
Core EFB Outlet (1520)
1 MBcLo MOOII-I MBcL6-M66n-2 MlicLo-Moo'ii-}
Test Date 9/14/92 9/15/92 9/15/92
Run Sun Tune
Run Finish Tune
Test Train Parameters:
Volume of Dry Gas Sampled, SCF*
Percent Ijokinetic
Flue Gas Parameters:
Carbon Dioxide, %
Temperature, Degrees F
Volumetric Air Flow Rates
SCFM'.Dry
ACFM.Wet
ALDEVKETONES EMISSION RESULTS:
FORMALDEHYDE
Mg per dry ctd. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ACETALDEHYDE
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ACROLEIN
Mg per dry sld. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ACETONE
Mg per dry sld. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
PROPION ALDEHYDE
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
CROTONALDEHYDE
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
n-BUTYRALDEHYDE
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
Mgper dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
1711
1816
48372
105.2
3.6
248
37,400
63,400
10,700
836
0.679
130
6,080
332
0387
0.852
2,760
1.18
0.176
0387
7,930
329
0304
1.11
776
0321
0.0493
0.109
413
0.142
0.0263
0.0579
1 0(W
0.004
0.127
0279
702
0234
0.0447
0.0984
1304
1409
47.868
1013
33
250
38,400
65,100
16300
13.0
1.06
234
6210
339
0.405
0.894
2.150
0.920
0.140
0309
3,850
1.60
0251
0354
319
0.132
0.0209
0.0460
480
0.165
0.0314
0.0692
942
0314
0.0615
0.136
763
0254
0.0498
1633
1738
48275
993
3.6
252
39300
66,813
14,600
11.7
0.982
2.16
5,880
321
0394
0.870
972
0.417
0.0652
0.144
11,800
4.91
0.794
1.75
U50
0.641
0.104
0229
1,630
0359
0.109
0241
4,410
1.47
02%
0.652
817
0273
0.0548
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
250
38,400
65,100
13,900
11.1
0.907
2.00
6,060
330
03%
0.872
1,960
0.839
0.127
0280
7,860
327
0317
1.14
882
0365
0.0580
0.128
841
0289
0.0556
0.123
2,450
0.816
0.161
0355
761
0254
0.0498
•MD«j F120C) - - 29 9? !•
3-30
-------
TABLE 3-15
ALDEHYDES/KETONES TESTS SUMMARY
Core EFB Outlet (1520)
MBCLO-MOOI1-1 MBCLO-M0011-2 MBCLO-M001-3
BENZALDEHYDE
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ISOVALERALDEHYDE
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
VALERALDEHYDE
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
o-TOLUALDEHYDE
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
m/p-TOLUALDEHYDE
Mg per drysld. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
HEXALDEHYDE
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
2,5-DIMETHYL BENZALDEHYDE
Mgper dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
8.680
1.97
0.552
122
1360
037%
0.0864
0.190
634
0.177
0.0403
0.0888
698
0.140
0.0444
0.0978
2,550
0.510
0.162
0357
1.550
0373
0.0987
0218
132
0.0237
0.00840
•0.0185
11,800
2.67
0.770
1.70
1,600
0.4334
0.101
0223
1,650
0.460
0.108
0237
967
0.194
0.0632
0.139
3,130
0.626
0204
0.450
1,790
0.429
0.117
0257
162
0.0291
0.0106
0.0234
8,940
2.03
0.600
132
1,570
0.4396
0.106
0233
1,190
0334
0.0801
0.177
945
0.189
0.0634
0.140
840
0.168
0.0564
0.124
2,180
0323
0.146
0322
1,010
0.1820
0.0680
0.150
Average
9,810
222
0.641
1.41
U10
0.418
0.0978
0216
1,160
0324
0.0760
0.168
870
0.174
0.0570
0.126
2,170
0.435
0.141
0311
1,840
0.442
0.121
0266
435
0.0783
0.0290
0.0640
* 41 D«i F (20 O - - 29.91 U.
3-31
-------
TABLE 3-16
ALDEHYDES/KETONES TESTS SUMMARY
Microboard Press Suck 11 (OEF-1)
Test Date 9/19/92 9/21/92 9/2292
Run Stan Time
Run Finish Time
Test Train Parameters:
Volume of Dry Gas Sampled, SCF"
Percent Isokinetic
Flue Gas Parameters:
Temperature, Degrees F
Volumetric Air Flow Rates
SCFM'.Dry
ACFM, Wet
ALDE./KETONES EMISSION RESULTS:
FORMALDEHYDE
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
J>pm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ACET ALDEHYDE
;ig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ACROLEIN
jtg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ACETONE
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
PROPIONALDEHYDE
>ig per dry ltd. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
CROTONALDEHYDE
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pound*- per hour
n-BUTYRALDEHYDE
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
1635
1753
42.196
100.0
111
8,030
8,980
33,300
26.7
0.454
1.00
336
0.184
0.00459
0.0101
221
0.0947
0.00301
0.00664
518
0.215
0.00707
0.0156
20.9
0.00866 "
0.000285
0.000629
64.4
0.0221
0.000879
0.00194
128
0.0427
0.00175
0.00385
4.18
0.00140
0.0000571
0.000126
1810
1927
37.935
1043
111
6,910
7,800
23,500
18.8
0.275
0.607
368
0.201
0.00431
0.00951
81.9
0.0351
0.000961
0.00212
1,050
0.434
0.0123
0.0270
0.930
0.00038S
Q.QOQ0109
0.0000241
4Z8
0.0147
0.000502
0.00111
129
0.0432
0.001S2
0.00335
26.1
0.00870
0.000306
0.000674
1421
1539
39.05
100.1
115
7,420
8,290
34,100
27.3
0.429
0.947
422
0.230
0.00532
0.0117
723
0.0310
0.000912
0.00201
726
0.301
0.00915
0.0202
0.900
0.000374
0.0000114
0.0000251
40.7
0.0140
0.000513
0.00113
117
0.0389
0.00147
0.00324
24.4
0.0815
0.000308
0 000679
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
112
7,450
8360
30300
243
0386
0.851
375
0.205
0.00474
0.0105
125
0.0536
0.00163
0.00359
765
0317
0.00950
0.0209
738
0.00314
0.000103
0.000226
493
0.0169
0.000631
0.00139
125
0.0416
0.00158
0.00348
18.2
0.0305
0.000224
0 000493
gigg BJUUW CM* WdfkL
g!;:;:%: All • lia* (MDL). VtU f
pip)
3-32
-------
TABLE 3-16 (co.tU.ed)
ALDEHYDBS/KETONES TESTS SUMMARY
Microboard Preu Stack 11 (DEF-1)
MBP11-M0011-1 MBP11-M0011-2 MBP11-M0011-3
BENZALDEHYDE
fig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ISO V ALERALDEH YD E
fig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
VALERALDEHYDE
fig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
o-TOLUALDEHYDE
fig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
m/p-TOLUALDEHYDE
fig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
HEXALDEHYDE
fig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
23 -DIMETHYL BENZALDEHYDE
fig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
87.9
0.0199
0.00120
0.00264
88.7
0.0248
0.00121
0.00267
126
0.0351
0.00171
0.00377
11.7
0.00234
0.000160
0.000352
6J.1
0.0122
0.000833
0.00184
232
0.0557
0.00316
0.00697
343
0.00616
0.000468
0.00103
108
0.0245
0.00127
0.00279
118
0.0330
0.00139
0.00306
217
0.0606
0.00255
0.00561
6.52
0.00130
0.0000765
0.000169
503
0.0101
0.000590
0.00130
588
0.141
0.00690
0.0152
14.0
0.00251
0.000164
0.000361
137
0.0310
0.00172
0.00380
123
0.0344
0.00155
0.00342
180
0.0503
0.00227
0.00500
14.5
0.00290
0.000182
0.000402
73.2
0.0147
0.000923
0.00204
378
0.0908
0.00477
0.0105
7.2300
0.00130
0.0000912
0.000201
Average
111
0.0251
0.00140
0.00308
110
0.0307
0.00138
0.00305
174
0.0486
0.00218
0.00480
10.9
0.00218
0.000140
0.000308
61.5
0.0123
0.000782
0.00173
399
0.0959
0.00494
0.0109
18.5
0.00332
0.000241
0.000531
in k«UuUt •
• 61 Dt(. F (20 O - - 29.92 U. Mcnai?
Itm* (MDL). Vftte
Mug 1/2 MDL lorcMfc
3-33
-------
1 TABLE 3-17
ALDEHYDES/KETONES TESTS SUMMARY
Microboard Press Stack 13 (DEF-3)
MBP12-M0011-1 MBP12-M0011-2 MBP12-M0011-3
Test Date
Run Start Tune
Run Finish Time
Test Train Parameters:
Volume of Dry Gas Sampled, SCF*
Percent Isokinetk
Flue Gas Parameters
Temperature, Degrees F
Volumetric Air Flow Rates
SCFM'.Dry
ACFM,Wet
ALDEVKETONES EMISSION RESULTS:
FORMALDEHYDE
/ig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour •>
ACETALDEHYDE
jig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ACROLEIN
/xg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ACETONE
/ig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
PROPIONALDEHYDE
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
CROTONALDEHYDE
/xg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
. _ kilograms per bout
pounds per hour
n-BUTYRALDEHYDE
fi% per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
/ig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
9/19/92
1635
1754
53.973
100.5
112
11,100
12,400
31,200
•25.0
0.591
130
338
0.185
0.00641
0.0141
89.0
0.0382
0.00169
0.00372
466
0.193
0.00884
0.0195
10.5
0.00433
0.000198
0.000437
26.8
0.00922
0.000508
0.00112
81.1
0.0271
0.00154
0.00339
3.93
0.0157
0.0000744
0.000164
9/21/92
1810
1927
51.416
973
112
11,000
12300
24,200
19.4
0.451
0.995
377
0.206
0.00703
0.0155
85.8
0.0368
0.00160
0.00353
966
0.401
0.0180
0.0397
0.687
0.000284
0.0000128 '
0.0000282
35.7
0.0123
0.000666
0.00147
125
0.0417
0.00233
0.00514
24.7
0.0165
0.000461
0.00102
9/22/92
1421
1539
49.987
915
116
luoo
12,600
34,200
27.4
0.651
1.43
424
0.231
0.00808
0.0178
91.1
0.0391
0.00174
0.00383
619
0.257
0.0118
0.0260
2.83
0.00117
0.0000538
0.000119
24.0
0.00825
0.000485
0.00101
91.8
0.0306
0.00175
0.00386
24.7
0.00825
0.000471
Average
N/A
N/A
N/A
. N/A
N/A
113
11,100
12,400
29,900
23.9
0.564
124
380
0207
0.00717
0.0158
88.6
0.0380
0.00167
0.00369
684
0284
0.0129
0.0284
4.66
0.00193
0.0000883
0.000195
0.00991
0.000553
0.00120
993
0.0331
0.00187
0.00413
17.8
0.0135
0.000335
auk w(tt> in k« tkti O< maimmm dcucooi bail (MDL). V.IKI prtttiud alabud uU| 1/2 MOL for ock auk «i|
6«D«(.F<20C)--29J2U.M«c».ry (C..O...J M»f.r)
3-34
-------
TABLE 3-17 (continued)
ALDEHYDES/KETONES TESTS SUMMARY
Microboard Press Sixk. 12 (DEF-3)
MBP12-M0011-1 MBP12-M0011-2 MBP12-M0011-3
BENZALDEHYDE
Aig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ISOVALERALDEHYDE
jig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
VALERALDEHYDE
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
o-TOLUALDEHYDE
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
m/p-TOLUALDEHYDE
jig per dry sid. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
HEXALDEHYDE
li% per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
24- DIMETHYL BENZALDEHYDE
/ig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
112
0.0175
0.00146
0.00322
67.4
0.0188
0.00128
0.00281
88.0
0.0247
0.00167
0.00369
&50
0.00170
0.000161
0.000355
543
0.0109
0.00103
0.00227
207
0.0497
0.00392
0.00863
25J
0.00458
0.000483
0.00107
106
0.0240
0.00197
0.00435
115
0.0322
0.00215
0.00474
229
0.0641
0.00427
0.00942
4.81
0.00962
0.00008%
0.000198
48.8
0.00976
0.000909
0.00200
613
0.147
0.0114
0.0252
' 16.5
0.00296
0.000307
0.000677
129
0.0293
0.00246
0.00543
108
0.0302
0.00206
0.00454
150
0.0420
0.00287
0.00632
2.12
0.000424
0.0000404
0.0000890
70.6
0.0141
0.00135
0.00297
350
0.0840
0.00666
0.0147
ZS3
0.000507
0.0000538
0.000119
Average
104
0.0236
0.00197
0.00433
96.8
0.0271
0.00183
0.00403
156
0.0436
0.00294
0.00648
5.14
0.00391
0.0000970
0.000214
57.9
0.0116
0.00109
0.00241
390
0.0936
0.00733
0.0162
14.9
0.00268
0.000281
0.000622
• 6» De». P (20 C) - - 1331 U. Me
3-35
-------
TABLE 3-IS
ALDEHYDES/KETCHES TESTS SUMMARY
Microboard Pro* Suck 13 (DEF-S)
Tat Date
Run Start Time
RUB Fisah Time
Tat Tram Parameter!:
Volume of Dry Gat Sampled, SCF*
Percent Isokiaetk
Flue Gat Parameters
Temperature, Degrees F
Volumetric Air Flow Rates
SCFM'.Dry
ACFM, Wet
ALDE./KETOKES EMISSION RESULTS:
FORMALDEHYDE
»tg per dry ttd. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ACETALDEHYDE
tig per dry ltd. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ACROLEIN
Mg perdrystd. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ACETONE
fig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
PROP1ONALDEHYDE
fig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
CROTONALDEHYDE
fig per dry std. cubk meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
„ /: YRALDEHYDE
>ig per dry ttd. cubk meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
/ig perdrystd. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
9/19/92
1635
1751
47.204
102.1
110
9,600
10,800
30300
24.3
0.495
1.09
354
0.193
0.00577
0.0127
96.5
0.0414
0.00157
0.00347
426
OM77
0.00694
0.0153
5.24
0.00217
0.000085
0.000188
48.6
0.0167
0.000793
0.00175
113
0.0377
0.00184
0.00406
3.74
0,00125
0.0000610
0.000135
9/21792
1810
1923
46.547
100.8
109
9,580
10,700
21,700
17.4
0353
0.778
357
0.194
0.00580
0.0128
78.1
0.0335
0.00127
0.00280
743
0308
0.0121
0.0267
0.760
0.000314
0.0000123
0.0000272
38.7
0.0133
0.000630
0.00139
.
Ill
0.0370
0.00180
0.00397
273
0.00911
0.000445
0.000980
9/22/92
1421
1536
48.2
100.4
118
9,960
11,200
30,700
24.6
0.519
1.14
289
0.158
0.00490
0.0108
52.7
0.0226
0.000893
0.00197
292
0.121
0.00495
0.0109
19.0
0.00789
0.000322
0.000711
26.4
0.00906
0.000446
0.000984
80.6
0.0269
0.00136
0.00301
19.8
0.00660
0.000335
0.000738
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
113
9,710
10,900
27,600
22.1
0.456
1.00
333
0.182
0.00549
0.0121
75.8
0.0325
0.00125
0.00275
487
0.202
0.00799
0.0176
835
0.00346
0.000140
0.000309
37.9
0.0130
0.000623
0.00137
102
0.0339
0.00167
0.00368
16.9
0.00565
0.000280
0000617
ggg; &UMC4 Cut WofkL
-- 2SL92 U. M«re«7
t mimf 1/J MEL tat Met uuk nifhL
ftft)
3-36
-------
TABLE 3-18 (coitiued)
ALDEHYDES/KETONES TESTS SUMMARY
Mkroboard Pica Suck 13 (DEF-5)
MBP13-M0011-1 MBP13-M0011-2 MBP13-M0011-3
BENZALDEHYDE
jig per dry ltd. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per boar
ISOVALERALDEHYDE
jig per dry >td. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilogram! per hour
pounds per hour
VALERALDEHYDE
jig per dry sld. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
o-TOLUALDEHYDE
jig per dry ltd. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
m/p-TOLUALDEHYDE
jig per dry ltd. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
HEXALDEHYDE
^g per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
2^-DIMETHYL BENZALDEHYDE
jig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
80.0
0.0181
0.00131
0.00288
72.6
0.0203
0.00118
0.00261
86.8
0.0242
0.00142
0.00312
3.74
0.00075
0.0000610
0.000134
15J)
OJD0299
0.000244
0,000538
183
0.0440
0.00299
0.00659
10.5
0.00188
0.000171
0.000307
108
0.0246
0.00177
0.00389
97.9
0.0273
0.00159
0.00351
212
0.0593
0.00346
0.00762
128
0.000455
0.0000370
0.000082
53.9
0.0108
0,000877
0.00193
•
505
0.121
0.00822
0.0181
49.3
0.00885
0.000803
0.00177
125
0.0284
0.00212
0.00467
87.9
0.0246
0.00149
0.00328
104
0.0291
0.00176
0.003S8
10.3
0.00205
0.000174
0.000383
70.3
0.0141
0.00119
0.00262
271
0.0651
0.00459
0.0101
463
0.00829 "
0.000781
0.00172
Average
105
0.0237
0.00173
0.00381
86.1
0.0241
0.00142
0.00313
134
0.0376
0.00221
0.00487
5.44
0.00108
0.0000907
0.000200
46.4
0.00929
0.000770
0.00170
320
0.0768
0.00527
0.0116
353
0.00634
0.000585
0.00127
u*r* taMtku (to •»•••• 4«t«aMM
* 6« Dif. P (20Q - - 29L9Z U. MWWT
ll/ZMDLEocc
3-37
-------
TABLE 3-19
ALDEHYDES/KETONES TESTS SUMMARY
Microboard Cooling Room Suck 14 (DEF-7)
MBCR14-M0011-1 MBCR14-M0011-2 MBCR14-M0011-3
Tat Due 9/22/92 9/22/92 9/24/92
Rum Start Time
RUB Finish Time
Te»l Train Parameters:
Volume of Dry Gas Sampled, SCF*
Percent Isokinetic
Flue Gat Parameters:
Temperature, Degrees F
Volumetric Air Flow Rates
SCFM*, Dry
ACFM, Wet
ALDE./KETONES EMISSION RESULTS:
FORMALDEHYDE
Mg per dry ltd. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pouads per hour
ACETALDEHYDE
Mg per dry ltd. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ACROLEIN
jig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ACETONE
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
PROPIONALDEHYDE
A*g per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
CROTONALDEHvnE
Mg P«i — , •—•±. C-i-.i i~^ -
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
B-BUTYRALDEHYDE
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
- — "••- •-' - • 1~-.
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
/ig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
1733
1900
45.218
101.5
127
14,400
16,600
7,710
6.18
0.189
0.417
163
0.0890
0.00401
0.00883
42.2
0.0181
0.00103
0.00228
288
0.120
0.00707
0.0156
0.781
0.000323
0.0000192
0.0000422
18.7
0.00644
0.000460
O.onipl.
49.2
0.0164
0.00121
0.00266
10.2
0.00339
0.000249
0.000549
1931
2059
51.11
96.2
123
15300
17,400
6,750
5.41
0.176
0387
149
0.0810
0.00387
0.00853
37.3
0.0160
0.000971
0.00214
2-13
0.0883
0.00554
0.0122
1.3*
0.000572
0.0000360
0.0000793
36.6
0.0126
0.000953
0.00210
"
753
0.0251
0.00196
0.00432
173
0.00576
0.000450
0.000991
753
937
5635
99.5
103
16300
17,600
5,090
4.08
0.141
0311
148
0.0807
0.00411
0.00905
33.2
0.0142
0.000922
0.00203
169-
0.0702
0.00470
0.0104
13.8
0.00571
0.000383
0.000844
27.6
0.00948
0.000766
0.00169
56.4 "
0.0188
0.00157
0.00345
113
0.0038
0.000313
0 000691
Avente
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
118
15300
17,200
6420
5.22
0.169
0372
153
0.0836
0.00399
0.00880
37.6
0.0161
0.000976
0.00215
223
0.0926
0.00577
0.0127
532
0.00220
0.000146
0.000322
27.6
0.00950
0.000726
0.00160
603
0.0201
0.00158
0.00348
12.9
0.00430
0.000337
0000744
^ All otcfc w«|ta n IVM tkM t*t •
• r
liu(MOLV V«l»»l frmwent tlnM
t 1/2 HDL lot oct <«u
(amum^t M f.r)
3-38
-------
TABLE 3-19 (confined)
ALDEHYDES/KETONES TESTS SUMMARY
Microboard Cooling Room Suck 14 (DEF-7)
MBCR14-M0011-1 MBCR14-M0011-2 MBCR14-M0011-3
BENZALDEHYDE
jig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kiiogranu per hour
pound* per hour
ISOVALERALDEHYDE
jtg per dry ltd. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
VALERALDEHYDE
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
o-TOLUALDEHYDE
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
m/p-TOLUALDEHYDE
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
HEXALDEHYDE
fig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
24-DIMETHYL BENZALDEHYDE
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
S3.1
0.0120
0.00130
0.00287
39.8
0.0111
0.000977
0.00215
57.0
0.0159
0.00140
0.00308
7.03
0.00141
O.OOOT72
0.000380
24.2
0.00484
0.000594
0.00131
133
0.0319
0.00326
0.00718
3.12
0.000561
0.0000767
0.000169
53.9
0.0122
0.00140
0.00309
50.4
0.0141
0.00131
0.00289
63.6
0.0178
0.00165
0.00365
2.76
0.000553
0.000072
0.000159
24.9
0.00498
0.000648
0.00143
120
0.0289
0.00313
0.00690
22.1
0.00397
0.000576
0.00127
35.1
0.00796
0.000974
0.00215
37.6
0.0105
0.00104
0.00230
533
0.0149
0.00148
0.00326
Z50
0.000500
0.0000700
0.000153
i«;2
OUJ0364
0.000505
Qjxnii
112
0.0268
0.00310
0.00683
6.89
0.00124
0.000191
0.000422
Average
47.4
0.0107
0.00123
0.00270
42.6
0.0119
0.00111
0.00245
57.9
0.0162
0.00151
0.00333
4.10
0.000821
0.000105
0.000231
22.4
0.00449
0.000582
0.00128
122
0.0292
0.00316
0.00697
10.7
0.00192
0.000281
0.000620
liM(MDL). Vilwp
| 1/2 MDL lor act c«<* -">!*.
•MD.fPC2DC) — 291S2 U. Mtrarr
3-39
-------
TABLE 3-20
ALDEHYDES/KETCHES TESTS SUMMARY
Microboard Cooling Room Stack 15 (DBF-8)
MBCR15-M0011-1 MBCR1S-M0011-2 MBCR1S-M0011-3
Text Date
RUB Start Time
RUB Finish Time
Teat Train Parameters:
Volume of Dry Oa> Sampled, SCF*
Percent Iso kinetic
Flue Gas Parameter!:
Temperature, Degrees F
Volumetric Air Flow Rate*
SCFM*. Dry
ACFM, Wet
ALDE./KETONES EMISSION RESULTS:
FORMALDEHYDE
MR per dry (td. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ACETALDEHYDE
Hg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ACROLEIN
/ig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilogram! per hour
pounds per hour
ACETONE
jig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilogram* per hour
pounds per hour
PROPIONALDEHYDE
/ig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
CROTONALDEHYDE
jig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
n- BUTYRALDEHYDE
/ig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
/ig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
9/22/92
1733
1900
43332
94.6
128
14,700
16,900
7.730
6.20
0.193
0.425
180
0.0982
0.00450
0.00991
61.1
0.0262
0.00153
0.00336
332
0.138
0.00830
0.0183
L63
0.000675
0.0000407
0.0000897
46.4
0.0160
0.00116
0.00256
- -
9X9
0.0310
0.00232
0.00511
163
0.00544
0.000407
0.000897
9/22/92
1951
2059
46.113
94.0
123
15,900
18,100
6,710
538
0.181
0399
145
0.0789
0.00391
0.00862
40.6
0.0174
0.00110
0.00242'
214
0.0886
0.00577
0.0127
0,770
0,000317
0.0000207
0.0000456
39.8
0.0137
0.00108
0.00237
75.0
0.0250
0.00203
0.00447
13.0
0.00434
0.000352
0.000775
9/24/92
753
927
50.717
96.6
104
17,000
18,100
4,780
3.83
0.138
0305
151
0.0824
0.00437
0.00963
383
0.0164
0.00111
0.00244
203
0.0840
0.00586
0.0129
0.700
0.000288
0.0000201
0.0000444
35.5
0.0122
0.00103
0.00226
73.8
0.0246
0.00213
0.00471
• • V - - • t£S
ooom
0.000362
0.000799
Average
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
118
15,900
17,700
6,410
5.14
0.171
0316
j
159
0.0865
0.00426
0.00939
46.7
0.0200
0.00124
0.00274
250
0.104
0.00664
0.0146
1.03
0.000427
0.0000272
0.0000599
40.6
0.014
0.00109
0.00240
80.6
0.0269
0.00216
0.00476
13.9
0.00465
0.000374
0.000824
iggg BMimutt Caui Wdftt.
HI?; All atck X10U vt k» Uu
•«Dtt,l"(20C) —
fcuaiM limit (HDL). Vtttt |rac«(4c»kaUt<4 uu| 1/2 MOLfor ock CMC* «ci|kl.
3-40
-------
TABLE 3-20 (co»ti»ed)
ALDEHYDES/KETONES TESTS SUMMARY
Microboard Cooling Room Stick 15 (DEF-8)
MBCR15-M0011-1 MBCR15-M0011-2 MBCR15-M0011-3
BENZALDEHYDE
Mg per dry ttd. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ISOVALERALDEHYDE
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
VALERALDEHYDE
fig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
o-TOLUALDEHYDE
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
m/p- TOLUALDEH YDE
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
HEXALDEHYDE
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
2^-DIMETHYL BENZALDEHYDE
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
64.4
0.0146
0.00161
0.00354
63.6
0.0178
0.00159
0.00350
78.2
0.0219
0.00195
0.00431
1.63
0.000326
0.0000407
0.0000897
31.0
0.00620
0.000773
0.00170
167
0.0401
0.00417
0.00919
12.2
0.00219
0.000305
0.000673
53.6
0.0121
0.00161
0.00356
49.8
0.0139
0.00134
0.00296
94.2
0.0263
0.00254
0.00561
3.06
0.000613
0.0000827
0.000182
23,7
0.00475
0.000641
0.00141
118
0.0283
0.00318
0.00702
6.89
0.00124
0.000186
0.000410
37.6
0.00852
0.00109
0.00240
42.5
0.0119
0.00123
0.00271
59.9
0.0167
0.00173
0.00382
2.09
0.0000418
0.0000604
0.000133
19.5
0.00390
0.000564
0.00124
114
0.0274
0.00330
0.00728
9.05
0.00162
0.000262
0.000577
Average
51.9
0.0117
0.00144
0.00317
51.9
0.0145
0.00139
0.00306
77.4
0.0216
0.00207
0.00458
2^6
0.000327
0.0000613
0.000135
24.7
0.00495
0.000659
0.00145
133
0.0319
0.00355
0.00783
938
0.00168
0.000251
0.000553
gHS EttuM CM* WcifM.
HH All out —.«*. « I— Uu ma,,
•«De(.P(20C)— 2SIS2 1*. Utnvy
3-41
-------
TABLE 3-21
PARTICULATE A CONDENSIBLE PARTICULATE TESTS SUMMARY
MDF Cyclone Outlet (DB)
MDFCO- M5/202- 1
Test Date
Run Start Time
Run Finish Time
Test Train Parameters:
Volume of Dry Gas Sampled, SCF*
Percent Isokenetic
Flue Gas Parameters:
Temperature, Degrees F
Volumetric Air Flow Rates
SCFM'.Dry
ACFM, Wet
PARTICULATE RESULTS:
Filterable
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
Extractablc Condeniibles
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
Non— Extractable Condensibles
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rale, pounds/hour
Total Paniculate
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
* 68 Deg. F (20 C) - - 29.92 In. Mercury
9/25/92
1327
1457
58.466
104.1
160
86,900
113,000
0.0158
532
11.7
0.00108
0365
0.806
0.0106
3.57
7.86
0.0274
9.25
20.4
MDFCO- M5/202-2
9/25/92
1626
1745
52337
108.2
158
94,200
121,000
0.0174
639
14.1
0.00203
0.745
1.64
0.00174
0.637
1.41
0.0212
7.77
17.1
MDFCO- M5/202-3
9/25/92
1843
2021
54.193
111.2
156
94,900
124,000
0.0181
6.69
14.8
0.00262
0.966
2.13
0.00695
2J6
5.65
0.0277
10.2
22J
Average
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
158
92,000
119,000
0.0171
6.13
13.5
0.00191
0.692
1.53
0.00642
2.26
4,97
0.0254
9.08
20.0
3-42
-------
TABLE 3-22
PARTI CULATE & CONDENSIBLE PARTI CULATE TESTS SUMMARY
Surface EFB Inlet
MBSLI-M5/202-2
Test Date
Run Stan Time
Run Finish Time
Test Train Parameters:
Volume of Dry Gas Sampled, SCF*
Percent Isokenetic
Flue Gas Parameters:
| Carbon Dioxide, %
Temperature, Degrees F
Volumetric Air Flow Rates
SCFM'.Dry
ACFM, Wet
PARTICULATE RESULTS:
Filterable
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
Eitractable Condensibles
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
Non— Extractable Condensibles
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
Total Paniculate
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
* 68 Deg. F (20 C) — 29.92 In. Mercury
9/16/92
1539
1659
42322
98.8
2.0
224
47,717
72,155
0.0492
9.12
20.1
0.00667
1.24
2.73
0.00445
0.825
1.82
0.0603
11.2
24.7
MBSLI-M5/202-3
9/17/92
839
955
41.684
100.1
2.0
218
46349
68,812
0.0415
7.49
16.5
0.00900
1.62
3.57
0.00381
0.687
1.51
0.0543
9.79
21.6
MBSLI-M5/202-4
9/18/92
925
1052
43.169
100.9
2.0
223
46,648
71,070
0.0487
8.83
19.5
0.0174
3.16
6.98
0.00393
0.713
1.57
12.7
28.0
Average
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
2.0
222
46,905
70,679
0.0465
8.48
18.7
0.0110
2.01
4.43
0.00406
0.742
1.64
•-' - - -
112
24.8
3-43
-------
TABLE 3-23
PARTICULATE & CONDENSIBLE PARTICULATE TESTS SUMMARY
Core EFB Inlet
MBCLI-M5/202-2
Test Date
Run Start Time
Run Finish Time
Test Train Parameters:
Volume of Dry Gas Sampled, SCF*
Percent Isokenelic
Flue Gas Parameters:
Carbon Dioxide, %
Temperature, Degrees F
Volumetric Air Flow Rates
SCFM'.Dry
ACFM, Wet
PARTICULATE RESULTS:
Filterable
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rale, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
Extraclable Condensibles
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
Non— Ertractable Condensibles
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
Total Paniculate
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
• 68 Deg. F (20 C) - - 29.92 In. Mercury
9/15/92
1010
1411
30.695
105.8
3.0
261
32,142
57,657
0.107
13.4
29.5
0.0452
5.65
12.5
0.0343
429
9.46
0.187
23.3
51.4
MBCLI-M5/202-3
9A5/92
1547
1729
30.781
107.0
3.7
262
31,891
56,530
0.0893
11.1
24.4
0.0497
6.16
13.6
0.0384
4.76
10.5
22.0
48.5
MBCLI-M5/202-4
9/15/92
1619
1910
30.654
108.2
3.0
262
31,401
57,014
0.149
182
40.1
0.0370
4.52
9.96
0.0377
4.60
10.1
273
602
Average
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
32
262
31,811
57,067
0.115
142
313
0.0440
5.44
12.0
0.0368
-4.55. =
10.0
; , 0.196
242
53.4
3-44
-------
TABLE 3-24
PM10 TESTS SUMMARY
MDF Cyclone Outlet (DB)
MDFCO-M201A-1 MDFCO-M201A-2 MDFCO-M201A-3
Test Date
Run Start Time
Run Finish Time
Test Train Parameters:
Volume of Dry Gas Sampled, SCF*
Percent Isokenetic
Flue Gas Parameters:
Temperature, Degrees F
Volumetric AitFlow Rales
SCFM',Dry
ACFHWet
Dia. of Particles in Cyclone,
Microns
PM10 EMISSION RESULTS:
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
TOTAL P ARTICULATE EMISSIONS f Include. PMlOt
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rale, pounds/hour
PARTICULATE FRACT1ONATION:
> PM10, %
< PM10, %
• 68 Deg. F (20 C) — 29.92 In. Mercury
9/25/92
1116
1457
44.173
110.1
154
101,000
131,000
9.52
0.00115
0.453
0.998
0.0267
10.5
23.1
95.7
433
9/26/92
1707
1937
47.411
112.9
148
100,000
128,000
9.54
0.00104
0.405
0.893
0.0208
8.09
17.8
95.0
5.01
9/27/92
945
1248
49.711
115.1
151
96,900
125,000
9.52
0.00590
2.22
4.90
0.0359
7.44
16.4
83.6
16.4
Average
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
151
99300
128,000
933
0.00270
1.03
Z26
0.0278
8.67
19.1
91.4
8J8
3-45
-------
TABLE 3-25
PM10 TESTS SUMMARY
MDF Press Stack 2 (WIW-2)
MDPP2-M201A/202-1 MDFP2-M201A/Z02-2 M DPP2- M201A/202- 3
Test Date
RUD Start Time
RUD Finish Time
Test Train Parameters:
Volume of Dry Gas Sampled, SCF*
Percent Isokenetic
Flue Gas Parameters:
Temperature, Degrees F
Volumetric Air Flow Rates
SCFM*, Dry
ACFM, Wet
Dia. of Particles ii Cyclone,
Micron
PM10 EMISSION RESULTS:
9/10/92
1148
1739
116.411
105.4
123
11,600
13,100
9.61
9/11/92
740
1145
101.57
107.4
114
1UOO
12400
9.89
9/11/92
1253
1821
109.198
101.1
121
11,700
13300
9.83
Average
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
119
11,500
13,000
9.78
laclsdiBg extractable/Boa — extraetable cbadeasibles
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rale, pounds/hour
0.0119
0.537
1.18
0.00678
0.295
0.650
0.00608
0.277
0.611
0.00826
0.370
0.815
Including only mo» — extractable coideisibles
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
Wilkoit coideliiblet (Filterable)
Concentration, gnins/DSCF'
Emiuion Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
0.0106
0.475
1.05
0.00363
0.164
0361
0.00656
0.286
0.630
0.00406
0.177
0389
0.00561
0.256
0.564
0.00376
0.171
0378
0.00757
0.339
0.747
0.00382
0.171
0376
TOTAL PART1CULATE EMISSIONS (Include. PMlOfc
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
PART1CULATE FRACTIONATION:
> PM10,%
< PM10, %
* 68 Deg. F (20 C) -- 29.92 In. Mercury
0.0207
0.932
2.06
42.4
57.6
0.0144
0.626
1.38
52.9
47.1
0.0117
0.535
1.18
48.2
51.8
0.0156
0.698
1.54
47.8
52.2
3-46
-------
TABLE 3-26
PM10 TESTS SUMMARY
MDF Press Stack 3 (WIW-1)
MDFP3-M201Affi02-l MDPP3-M201AJ202-2 MDPP3-M201A/202-3
Test Date
Run Start Time
Run Finish Time
Test Train Parameters:
Volume of Dry Gas Sampled, SCF
Percent Isokenetic
Flue Gas Parameters:
Temperature, Degrees F
Volumetric Air Flow Rates
SCFM'.Dry
ACFM, Wet
Dia. of Particles in Cyclone,
Micron*
PM10 EMISSION RESULTS:
9AO/92
1148
1742
115.788
96.0
125
11,900
13,700
9.68
9/11/92
739
1158
110.621
923
119
12,400
14,100
9.64
9/11/92
1352
1803
106.81
91.8
123
12,500
14,200
9.62
Average
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
122
12300
14,000
9.65
Including extracts blc/non— extractablc condensiblo
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
0.0108
0.502
1.11
0.00756
0363
0.800
0.0473
230
5.07
0.0219
1.06
233
Including only non— citrac table condenaibles
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
Without condensiblo (Filterable)
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
0.00950
0.440
0.971
0.00454
0.211
0.464
0.00583
0.280
0.617
0.00393
0.189
0.416
0.0473
230
5.07
0.00364
•
0.177
0.391
S
0.0209
1.01
2.22
0.00404
0.192
0.424
TOTAL PARTICULATE EMISSIONS (Include* PMlOk
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
PARTICULATE FRACTIONATION:
> PM10, %
< PM10, %
* 68 Deg. F (20 C) - - 29.92 In. Mercury
0.0209
0.968
2.13
48.1
51.9
0.0143
0.687
1.51
47.1
52.9
0.0555
2.70
5.96
14.9
85.1
0.0302
1.45
320
36.7
633
22-Apr-93
3-47
-------
TABLE 3-27
PM10 TESTS SUMMARY
MDF Press Stack 4 (WIW-5)
MDPP4-M201AC02-1 MDPP4-M201A/202-2 M DFP4- M201A/202- 3
Test Due
Run Start Time
Run Finish Time
Test Train Parameters:
Volume of Dry Gas Sampled, SCF*
Percent Isokenetic
Flue Gas Parameters:
Temperature, Degrees F
Volumetric Air Flow Rates
SCFM'.Dry
ACFM, Wet
Dia. of Particles im Cycloie,
Micron
PM10 EMISSION RESULTS:
9I12J92
1625
2059
106.97
100.7
96
19,400
20,800
9.89
9/13/92
840
1253
109.521
94.8
89
20,800
21,900
9.98
9/13/92
1408
1812
94.097
103.3
97
19,100
20,200
9.92
Average
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
94
19,800
21,000
9.93
I«cl«di«g extractable/BOB — extractable eo*de*iiblei
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emiuion Rale, pounds/hour
0.00169
0.127
0.281
0.00213
0.172
0.380
0.00272
0.202
0.446
0.00218
0.167
0.369
laclBdiBg oaly BOB — extractable coadeniblei
Concentration, graini/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
WitkoBl coBdcBiibles (Filterable)
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
0.00169
0.127
0.281
0.000505
0.0381
0.0840
0.000690
0.0559
0.123
0.000268
•
0.0217
0.0478
0.00239
0.178
0.392
0.00144
0.107
0.236
0.00159
0.120
0.265
0.000739
0.0560
0.123
TOTAL PARTICULATE EMISSIONS (Include. PM10V
Concentration, graint/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
PARTICULATE PRACTIONATION:
> PM10, %
< PM10, %
• 68 Deg. F (20 C) - - 29.92 In. Mercury
0.00248
0.187
0.413
32.0
68.0
0.00318
0.258
0.568
33.2
66.8
0.00280
0.208
0.459
2.92
97.1
0.00282
0.218
0.480
22.7
77.3
3-48
-------
TABLE 3-28
PM10 TESTS SUMMARY
MDF Press Slack 5 (WIW-3)
MDPP5-M201A/2(K-1 MDFP5-M201A/202-2
Test Date
Run Start Time
Run Finish Tune
Test Train Parameters:
Volume of Dry Gas Sampled, SCF*
Percent Isokenetic
Flue Gas Parameters:
Temperature, Degrees F
Volumetric Air Flow Rates
SCFM'.Dry
ACFHWet
Dia. of Particles in Cyclone,
Microns
PM10 EMISSION RESULTS:
9/12/92
1625
2122
11&616
90.8
96
58^00
62,200
9.75
9/13/92
840
1226
94.875
103.0
88
52,600
55,100
9.85
MDFPS-M201A/202-3
9/13/92
1348
1842
117.675
90.9
97
59,500
63300
. 9.75
Averaee
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
94
56,800
60300
9.78
Including extraclable/non— extractable condcnsiblcs
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rale, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
0.00125
0.283
0.623
0.00111
0226
0.498
0.000393
0.0910
0301
0.000916
0300
0.441
Including only non— eztractable condensibles
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rale, pounds/hour
Without condensibles (Filterable)
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
0.00120
0371
0.597
0.000247
0.0559
Emission Rate, pounds/hour 0.123
TOTAL P ARTICULATE EMISSIONS Unctudci PMlOt
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
PARTICULATE FRACTIONATION:
> PM10, %
< PM10, %
* 68 Deg. F (20 C) — 29.92 In. Mercury
0.00215
0.486
1.07
41.8
583
0.000960
0.196
0.432
0.0000976
0.0199
0.0440
0.00192
0392
0.865
42.4
57.6
0.000393
0.0910
0.201
0.0000131
0.00303
0.00669
0.000879
0303
0.448
553
44.8
0.000850
0.186
0.410
0.000119
0.0263
0.0580
0.00165
0360
0.794
46.5
53-5
3-49
-------
TABLE 3-29
PM10 TESTS SUMMARY
MDF Press Slack 6 (WIW-4)
MDFP6
Test Date
Run Stan Time
Run Finish Time
Test Train Parameters:
Volume of Dry Gas Sampled, SCF*
Percent Isokenetic
Flue Gas Parameters:
Temperature, Degrees F
Volumetric Air Flow Rates
SCFM*, Dry
ACFM, Wet
Dia. of Particles in Cyclone,
Microns
PM10 EMISSION RESULTS:
M20 02-1 p
9AO/92
925
1458
111.539
110.6
100
30^00
33,000
9.75
P6 M201A/Z02 2 M
9/11/92
735
1159
109311
105.6
96
31,600
33,900
° 9.89
DFP6-M201A/202-3
9/11/92
1353
1756
105314
111.1
98
30,500
33,100
9.69
Average
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
98
30,900
33300
9.78
Including extractable/non— extractable condensibles
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rale, pounds/hour
0.00284
0336
0.741
0.00207
0255
0.561
0.00190
0226
0.497
0.00227
0272
0.600
Including only non— cxtractablc condensiblcs
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
Without condensibles (Filterable)
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
0.00187
0221
0.488
0.000208
0.0246
0.0543
0.00155
0.191
0.420
0.000198
0.0243
0.0535
0.00100
0.118
0260
0.0000586
0.00694
0.0153
0.00147
0.177
0389
0.000155
0.0186
0.0410
TOTAL P ARTICULATE EMISSIONS (Includes PMlOfc
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
PARTICULATE FRACTIONATION:
> PM10, %
< PM10, %
• 68 Deg. F (20 C) — 29.92 In. Mercury
0.00434
0.515
1.14
34.7
653
0.00374
0.459
1.01
444
554
0.00334
0396
0.872
43.0
57.0
0.00381
0.457
1.01
40.7
593
3-50
-------
TABLE 3-30
PM10 TESTS SUMMARY
Surface EFB Outlet (1510)
MBSLO-M201A/2(C-2 MBSLO-M201A/ZCB-3
Test Date 9/16/92 9/11/92
Run Stan Time
Run Finish Time
Test Train Parameters:
Volume of Dry Gas Sampled, SCF'
Percent Isokenetic
Flue Gas Parameters:
Carbon Dioxide, %
Temperature, Degrees F
Volumetric Air Flow Rales
SCFM*, Dry
ACFM, Wei
Dia. of Particles in Cyclone,
Microns
PM10 EMISSION RESULTS:
Including ertractablc/non- extractable
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
1225
1357
33.099
104.8
2.0
219
47,700
70,600
9.61
condensibles
Broken
Including only non— extractable condensibles
Concentration, grains/DSCF* Broken
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
Without condensibles (Filterable)
Concentration, grains/DSCF* 0.00149
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour 0.276
Emission Rale, pounds/hour 0.609
TOTAL PARTICULATE EMISSIONS (Inchida PMlOt
Concentralion, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rale, kilograms/hour
Emission Rale, pounds/hour
PARTICULATE FRACTIONATION:
> PM10, %
< PM10, %
• 68 Deg. F (20 C) — 29.92 In. Mercury
N/A
N/A
N/A
1550
1719
36.657
99.0
1.9
217
49,900
72,200
9.78
0.0140
2.72
5.99
0.0124
2.41
5.31
0.00627
1.22
2.68
0.0200
3.89
8.57
30.0
70.0
MBSLO-M201A/Zm-4
9/18/92
839
1027
32.361
106.1
1.7
221
46,600
70,000
9.52
0.00801
1.45
320
0.00648
1.17
239
0.00305
0.552
1.22
0.0138
2.49
5.50
41.9
58.1
Average
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1.9
219
48,100
70,900
9.64
0.00734
2.08
4.59
0.00630
1.79
3.95
0.00361
0.682
1.50
0.0113
3.19
7.03
24.0
42.7
3-51
-------
TABLE 3-31
PM10 TESTS SUMMARY
Core EFB Outlet (1520)
MBCLO- M201 A/202- 2 MBCLO -
Test Date
Run Start Time
Run Finish Time
Test Train Parameters:
Volume of Dry Gas Sampled, SCF'
Percent Isokenetic
Flue Gas Parameters:
Carbon Dioxide, %
Temperature, Degrees F
Volumetric Air Flow Rates
SCFM*, Dry
ACFM, Wet
Dia. of Particles in Cyclone,
Microns
PM10 EMISSION RESULTS:
9/15/92
1204
1411
32.642
982
3.0
251
38,100
67,000
929
M201A/202-3
9/15/92
1546
1736
35.152
95.3
3.0
252
40200
68,100
937
MBCLO - M201 A/202 -4
9/15/92
1857
2029
31.520
96.9
3.5
252.0
38,700
67,400
9.30
Average
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
32
252
39,000
67,500
9.32
Including extractable/non— extrac table condensibles
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rale, pounds/hour
0.0881
13.0
28.7
0.0664
10.4
22.9
Sample
Jar
Broken
0.0773
11.7
25.8
Including only non— ertractable condensibles
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
Without condensibles (Filterable)
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
TOTAL P ARTICULATE EMISSIONS (Include.
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rale, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
PARTI CULATE FRACT1ONAT1ON:
> PM10, %
< PM10, %
* 68 Deg. F (20 C) — 29.92 In. Mercury
0.0675
9.99
22.0
0.0278
4.11
9.07
PMlOfc
0.0995
14.7
32.4
11.4
88.6
0.0499
7.80
172
0.0154
2.40
529
0.165
25.8
56.8
59.7
40.3
Sample
Jar
Broken
0.0289
4.53
9.58
Not
Calculated
N/A
N/A
0.0587
8.89
19.6
0.0240
3.68
7.98
0.132
20.3
44.6
35.6
64.4
3-52
-------
TABLE 3-32
PM10 TESTS SUMMARY
Microboard Press Stack 11 (DEF-1)
MBP11-M201 A/202-1 MBP11-M201A/202-2 MBP11-M201A/202-3
Test Dale
Run Start Time
Run Finish Time
Test Train Parameters:
Volume of Dry Gas Sampled, SCF*
Percent Isokenetic
Flue Gas Parameters:
Temperature, Degrees F
Volumetric Air Flow Rates
SCFM'.Dry
ACFM, Wet
Dia. of Particle* in Cyclone, Micron
PM10 EMISSION RESULTS:
9/19/92
1044
1513
98.927
105.5
113
8,710
. 9,710
9.63
9/21/92
902
1240
91.735
112.0
108
8^20
9,100
9.74
9/22/92
906
1309
105 .564
112.9
110
8,220
9,140
9.62
Average
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
110
8380
9^20
9.66
Including extractable/non— extrac table condensibles
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
0.00264
0.0892
0.197
0.00288
0.0919
0.203
0.00295
0.0943
0.208
0.00282
0.0918
0202
Including only non— eztnctable condensibles
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
Without condcnsibles (Filterable)
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
0.00214
0.0723
0.159
0.000281
0.00951
0.0210
0.00272
0.0871
0.192
0.00123
0.0392
0.0865
0.00110
0.0350
0.0772
0.000292
0.00934
0.0206
0.00199
0.0648
0.143
0.000600
0.0194
0.0427
TOTAL PARTICULATE EMISSIONS (Include* PMlOfc
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
PART1CULATE FRACT1ONAT1ON:
> PM10, %
< PM10, %
* 68 Deg. F (20 C) — 29.92 In. Mercury
0.00354
0.120
0.264
25.6
74.4
0.00372
0.119
0262
22.6
77.4
0.00351
0.112
0247
15.8
842
0.00359
0.117
0258
213
78.7
3-53
-------
TABLE 3-33
PM10 TESTS SUMMARY
Mkroboard Press Stack 12 (DBF-3)
MBP12-M201A/202-1 MBP12-M201A/202-2 MBP12-M201A/202-3
Test Date
Run Stan Time
Run Finish Time
Test Train Parameters:
Volume of Dry Gas Sampled, SCF*
Percent Isokenetic
Flue Gas Parameters:
Temperature, Degrees F
Volumetric Air Flow Rates
SCFM'.Dry
ACFM, Wet
Dia. of Particles in Cyclone, Microm
PM10 EMISSION RESULTS:
9A9/92
1041
1528
101.816
96.6
114
12,400
13,800
9.78
9/21/92
858
1325
109.724
97.9
110
11,900
13^00
9.98
9/22/92
906
1305
98.725
108.1
111
10,800
12,100
9.96
Average
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
112
11,700
13,100
9.91
Including extractable/non— extractablc coodeniiblo
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
0.00408
0.0893
0.197
0.00356
0.0749
0.165
0.00200
0.0380
0.0838
0.00321
0.0674
0.149
Including only non— citractable condensibles
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
Without condensiblcs (Filterable)
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
TOTAL P ARTICULATE EMISSIONS (Include.
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
PARTICULATE FRACTIONATION:
> PM10, %
< PM10, %
* 68 Deg. F (20 C) — 29.92 In. Mercury
0.00373
0.0817
0.180
0.000679
0.0193
0.0425
PM10):
0.00638
0.140
0.308
36.1
63.9
0.00302
0.0637
0.140
0.000956
0.0201
0.0444
_.
0.00771
0.162
0358
53.8
462
0.00183
0.0347
0.0766
0.000406
0.00772
0.0170
0.00375
0.0712
0.157
46.7
533
0.00286
0.0600
0.132
0.000747
0.0157
0.0346
0.00595
0.124
0.274
45.5
54.5
3-54
-------
TABLE 3-34
PM10 TESTS SUMMARY
Microboard Press Slack 13 (DEF-5)
MBP13-M201A/202-1 MBP13-M201A/202-2 MBP13-M201A/202-3
Test Date
Run Start Time
Run Finish Time
Test Train Parameters:
Volume of Dry Gas Sampled, SCF*
Percent Isokenetic
Flue Gas Parameters:
Temperature, Degrees F
Volumetric Air Flow Rates
SCFM'.Dry
ACFM, Wet
Dia. of Particles in Cyclone, Microm
PM10 EMISSION RESULTS:
9A9/92
1020
1528
106.069
112.8
112
10300
11,500
9.93
9/21/92
858
1301
103.756
111.7
108
10,600
11,700
9.92
9/22/92
904
1258
100.185
118.1
112
10,100
11300
9.80
Average
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
110
10300
11^00
9.89
Including crtractablc/non— cxtractablc condensible*
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
0.00317
0.127
0281
0.00275
0.114
0250
0.00243
0.0957
0211
0.00279
0.112
0247
Including only non— extractable condensibles
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
Without condensibles (Filterable)
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
0.00214
0.0858
0.189
0.000175
0.00700
0.0154
0.00232
0.0958
0211
0.000283
0.0117
0.0257
0.00206
0.0811
0.179
0.00116
0.0454
0.100
0.00217
0.0876
0.193
0.000537
0.0214
0.0471
TOTAL ?ARTICULATB EMISSIONS (Include* PMlOfc
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
PARTICULATE FRACTIONATION:
> PM10, %
< PM10, %
* 68 Deg. F (20 C) — 29.92 In. Mercury
0.00393
0.158
0347
193
80.7
0.00396
0.163
0360
30.5
69.5
0.00305
0.120
0264
202
79.8
0.00364
0.147
0.324
233
76.7
3-55
-------
TABLE 3-35
PM10 TESTS SUMMARY
Microboard Press Stacks 14&15 (DEF-7&8)
MBCR14-M20W202-1 MBCR1S-M201A/202-1
Test Date
Run Start Time
Run Finish Time
Test Train Parameters:
Volume of Dry Gas Sampled, SCF*
Percent Isokenetic
Flue Gas Parameters: '
Temperature, Degrees F
Volumetric Air Flow Rales
SCFM*. Dry
ACFM, Wet
Dia. of Particle* i* Cjclome, Micros
PM10 EMISSION RESULTS:
liciidiig extractablc/ioi — extractable coideuible*
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rale, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
Iiclidiig oily io«— extractable coideuibles
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
Withoil coideuiblex (Filterable)
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
TOTAL P ARTICULATE EMISSIONS (Includes PM101:
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
PARTICULATE FRACTIONATION:
> PM10,%
< PM10,%
• 68 Deg. F (20 C) - - 29.92 In. Mercury
9/23/92
1055
1459
100.138
112-8
107
15,600
17,000
10.02
0.000847
0.0514
0.113
0.000740
0.0449
0.0989
0.000108
0.00654
0.0144
0.00145
U0879
0.194
41.5
58.5
9/23/92
1055
1502 *
101.894
1055
109
16.500
18,100
9.92
0.000379
0.0243
0.0536
0.000318
0.0204
0.0450
0.000212
0.0136
0.0300
0.00112
0.0720
0.159
66.2
33.8
3-56
-------
TABLE 3-36
SEMFVOLATILE ORGANIC TESTS SUMMARY
MDF Cyclone Outlet (DB)
MDFCO- M0010-1
Test Date
Run Start Time
Run Finish Time
Test Train Parameters:
Volume of Dry Gas
Sampled, SCF*
Percent Isokinetic
Flue Gas Parameters:
Temperature, Degrees F
Volumetric Air Flow Rates
SCFM', Dry
ACFM, Wet
EMISSION RESULTS:
A-PINENE
>ig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
B-PINENE
>tg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
A-TERPINEOL
/ig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
* 68 Deg. F (20 C) -- 29.92 In. Mercury
9-26-92
1109
1502
109.856
99.0
154
92,600
119,000
129
0.0228
0.0203
0.0448
146
0.0258
0.0230
0.0506
49.0
0.00249
0.00771
0.0170
MDFCO-M0010-2 MDFCO-M0010-3
9-26-92
1706
1945
105.877
100.1
147
88,300
113,000
172
0.0304
0.0258
0.0570
172
0.0304
0.0258
0.0569
58.9
0.00268
0.00884
0.0195
•
9-27-92
941
1257
103.978
101.7
•
150
85,400
110,000
132
0.0233
0.0191
0.0422
147
0.0260
0.0213
0.0471
50.3
0.00277
0.00730
0.0161
Average
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
150
88,800
114,000
144
0.0255
0.0218
0.0480
155
0.0274
0.0234
0.0515
52.7
0.00265
0.00795
0.0175
3-57
-------
TABLE 3-37
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC TESTS SUMMARY
Surface EFB Outlet (1510)
MBSLO-M0010-1 MBSLO-M0010-2
Test Date
Run Start" •
Run Finish Time
Test Train Parameters:
Volume of Dry Gas
Sampled, SCF*
Percent Isokinelic
Flue Gas Parameters:
Carbon Dioxide, %
Temperature, Degrees F
Volumetric Air Flow Rates
SCFM*,Dry
ACFM, Wet
EMISSION RESULTS:
P-CYMENE
/xg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
A-PINENE
/ig per dry std. cubic meter'
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
B-PDNENE
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
A-TERPINEOL
/ug per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
* 68 Deg. F (20 C) - - 29.92 In. Mercury
9-17-92
1227
1509
99.395
100.6
1.9
219
48,645
73,216
46.9
•0.00841
0.00388
0.00855
20,859
3.68
1.72
3.80
6,789
120
0.56
1.24
2,413
0.376
0.199
0.440
9-17-92
1801
2035
104.195
98.9
2.0
221
51,850
76,297
48.5
0.00869
0.00427
0.00941
16356
2.89
1.44
3.18
. . . - 5,768
1.02
0.51
1.12
2399
0.374
0.211
0.466
MBSLO-M0010-3
9-18-92
1225
1508
104.021
96.7
2.0
215
52,961
75,684
46.8
0.00840
0.00422
0.00929
15,710
2.77
1.41
3.12
4,886-
0.86
0.44
0.97
2,642
0.412
0238
0.524
Average
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
2.0
218
51,152
75,066
47.0
0.00850
0.00410
0.00910
17,642
3.12
1.53
336
- . . . 5814
1.03
030
1.11
2485
0387
0.216
0.477
3-58
-------
TABLE 3-38
SEM [VOLATILE ORGANIC TESTS SUMMARY
Core EFB Outlet (1520)
Test Date
Run Stan Time
Run Finish Time
Test Train Parameters:
Volume of Dry Gas
Sampled, SCF*
Percent Isokinetic
Flue Gas Parameters:
Carbon Dioxide, %
Temperature, Degrees F
Volumetric Air Flow Rales
SCFM*, Dry
ACFM, Wet
EMISSION RESULTS:
P-CYMENE
jig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
A-PINENE
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
B-PINENE
/ig per dry sld. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
A-TERPINEOL
/ig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
Estimated Catch Weight.
Catch weight less than minimi'
~~* 68 Deg. F (20 Q — 29.92 In.
MBCLO-MOOlO-1
9-17-92
1204
1533
128.497
100.8
4.0
254
38,306
67398
561
0.101
0.0365
0.0806
174,281
30.8
11.3
25.0
71,189
12.6
4.63
102
16,107
2.51
1.05
2.31
m H»tection limit (MDL).
iviciuury
MBCLO-M0010-2 N
9-17-92
1801
2035
11079
1033
4.0
252
40,463
67,852
0.159
0.0000284
0.0000109
0.0000240
221,606
39.1
152
33.6
61,046
10.8
420
925
11336
1.77
0.779
1.72
Values presented calculated using
rfBCLO-M0010-3
9-18-92
1249
1551
100.098
103.0
4.0
253
36,500
65,022
599
0.107
0.0371
0.0819
191328
33.8
11.9
262
71,671
12.T
4.45
9.80
15,451
2.41
0.958
2.11
1/2 MDL.
Average
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
4.0
253
38,423
66,757
387
0.0693
0.0246
0.0542
195,738
34.6
12.8
283
67,968
12.0
4.43
9.76
14298
223
0.929
2.05
3-59
-------
TABLE 3-39
TOTAL HYDROCARBONS TEST SUMMARY
MDF Cyclone Outlet (DB)
MDFCO-M25A-1 MDFCO-M25A-2
Test Dale
Run Start Time
Run Finish Time
Dry Mole Fraction"
Air Flow Rate, SCFM*, Dry
CEM RESULTS:
Total Hydrocarbons'*
Concentration
parts per million, wet
parts per million, dry
milligrams / dry std. m3'"
Emission Rate
Pounds per Hour
Kilograms per Hour
* From Concurrent Isokinetic Testing
** As Propane
•*• 68 Degrees F - - 29.92 Inches Of Mercury (Hg)
9/25/92
1255
1458
0.897
87,000
10.4
11.6
21.3
6.93
3.14
9/25/92
1540
1742
0.912
94,900
11.8
12.9
23.6
8.41
3.81
MDFCO-M25A-3
9/25/92
1824
2018
0.904
96,100
10.3
11.4
20.9
7.52
3.41
•
Average
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.904
92,700
10.8
12.0
21.9
7.62
3.45
TABLE 3-40
TOTAL HYDROCARBONS TEST SUMMARY
MDF Press Stack 2 (WIW-2)
MDFP2-M25A-1 MDFP2-M25A-3A MDFP2-M25A-3C
Test Dale
Run Slarl Time
Run Finish Time
Dry Mole Fraction*
Air Flow Rale, SCFM', Dry
CEM RESULTS:
Tolal Hydrocarbons"
Conceniralion
parls per million, wel
parts per million, dry
milligrams / dry std. m3" •
Emission Rate
Pounds per Hour
Kilograms per Hour
* From Concurrent Isokinetic Tesling
" As Propane
"* 60 _.;;;esF -- 29.92 Inches Of Mercury (Hg)
9/11/92
1934
2100
0.955
11,200
24.6
25.8
47.3
1.98
0.898
9/12/92
1211
1335
0.978
11,400
17.4
17.8
32.6
1.39
0.631
9/12/92
1335
1446
0.978
11,400
16.9
17.3
31.7
1.35
0.612
Average
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.970
11,300
19.6
20.3
37.2
1.57
0.714
3-60
-------
TABLE 3-41
TOTAL HYDROCARBONS TEST SUMMARY
MDF Press Suck 3 (WIW-1)
MDFP3-M25A-1 MDFP3-M25A-3A MDFP3-M25A-3C
Test Date
Run Start Time
Run Finish Time
Dry Mole Fraction*
Air Flow Rate, SCFM*, Dry
CEM RESULTS:
Total Hydrocarbons**
Concentration
parts per million, wet
parts per million, dry
milligrams / dry std. m3* * *
Emission Rate
Pounds per Hour
Kilograms per Hour
* From Concurrent Isokinetic Testing
** As Propane
*** 68 Degrees F - - 29.92 Inches Of Mercury (Hg)
9/11/92
1934
2100
0.967
12,400
32.7
33.8
62.0
2.88
1.31
9/12/92 '
1211
1335
0.970
12,600
26.3
27.1
49.7
2.34
1.06
9/12/92
1335
1446
0.972
12,600
25.6
26.3
48.2
2.28
1.03
Average
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.970
12,500
28.2
29.1
53.3
2.50
1.13
TABLE 3-42
TOTAL HYDROCARBONS TEST SUMMARY
MDF Press Stack 4 (WIW-5)
MDFP4-M25A-4 MDFP4-M25A-5 MDFP4-M25A-6
Test Date
Run Start Time
Run Finish Time
Dry Mole Fraction*
Air Flow Rate, SCFM*, Dry
CEM RESULTS:
Total Hydrocarbons**
Concentration
parts per million, wet
pans per million, dry
milligrams / dry std. m3*"
Emission Rate
Pounds per Hour
Kilograms per Hour
* From Concurrent Isokinetic Testing
** As Propane
"68 Degrees F - - 29.92 Inches Of Mercury (Hg)
9/12/92
1753
2038
0.982
17,400
4.5
4.58
8.40
0.547
0.248
9/13/92
830
1022
0.983
20,900
3.5
3.56
6.53
0.511
0.232
•
-' -~-
9/13/92
1249
1533
0.981
20,200
4.7
4.79
8.78
0.664
0.301
Average
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.982
19,500
4.2
4.31
7.90
0.574
0.260
3-61
-------
TABLE 3-43
TOTAL HYDROCARBONS TEST SUMMARY
MDF Press Stack 5 (WIW-3)
MDFP5-M25A-4 MDFP5-M25A-5 MDFP5-M25A-6
Test Date
Run Start Time,
Run Finish Time
Dry Mole Fraction'
Air Flow Rate, SCFM*, Dry
CEM RESULTS:
. Total Hydrozarbons**
Concentration
parts per million, wet
parts per million, dry
milligrams / dry std. m3***
Emission Rate
Pounds per Hour
Kilograms per Hour
* From Concurrent Lsokinelic Testing
** As Propane
•"68 Degrees F — 29.92 Inches Of Mercury (Hg)
9/12/92
1753
2038
0.984
56,600
3.1
3.15
5.77
1.22
0.553
9/13/92
830
1022
0.975
54,200
23
236
433
0.878
0398
9/13/92
1249
1533
0.986
53300
3.0
3.04
5.57
1.11
0.503
Average
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.982
54,700
2.8
185
5.22
1.07
0.485
TABLE 3-44
TOTAL HYDROCARBONS TEST SUMMARY
MDF Press Stack 6 (WIW-4)
MDFP6-M25A-1 MDFP6-M25A-3A MDFP6-M25A-3C
Test Date
Run Start Time
Run Finish Time
_ Dry Mole Fraction*
Air Flow Rate, SCFM', Dry
CEM RESULTS:
Total Hydrocarbons**
Concentration
parts per million, wet
parts per million, dry
milligrams / dry std. m3***
Emission Rate
Pounds per Hour
Kilograms per Hour
* From Concurrent Isokinetic Testing
"As Propane
*•• 68 Degrees F - - 29.92 Inches Of Mercury (Hg)
9/1 1/92
1934
2100
0.974
28,800
5.5
5.65
10.4
1.12
0.508
9/12/92
1211
1335
0.974
26,600
5.6
5.75
10.5
1.050
0.476
9/12/92
1335
1446
0.974
26,600
5.8
5.95
10.9
1.09
0.494
Average
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.974
27300
5.6
5.78
10.6
1.09
0.493
3-62
-------
TABLE 3-45
TOTAL HYDROCARBONS TEST SUMMARY
Core EFB Inlet
MBCLI-M25A-1 MBCLI-M25A-4 MBCLI-M25A-5
Test Date
Run Start Time
Run Finish Time
Dry Mole Fraction*
Air Flow Rate, SCFM*, Dry
CEM RESULTS:
Total Hydrocarbons
Concentration
parts per million, wet
parts per million, dry
milligrams / dry std. m3* *
Emission Rate
Pounds per Hour
Kilograms per Hour
* From Concurrent Isokinetic Testing
** 68 Degrees F -- 29.92 Inches Of Mercury (Hg)
9/14/92
1723
1852
0.789
33,200
344
436
799
99.4
45.1
9/15/92
1648
1748
0.767
31,900
323
421
772
92.2
41.8
9/15/92
1900
2000
0.749
31,400
460
614
1,130
132
59.9
Average
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.768
•3-v -.^
376
490
900
108
48.9
TABLE 3-46
TOTAL HYDROCARBONS TEST SUMMARY
Surface EFB Inlet
MBSLI-M25A-1
Test Date
Run Start Time
Run Finish Time
Dry Mole Fraction*
Air Flow Rate, SCFM*, Dry
CEM RESULTS:
Total Hydrocarbons
Concentration
parts per million, wet
parts per million, dry
milligrams / dry sld. m3**
Emission Rate
Pounds per Hour
Kilograms per Hour
* From Concurrent Isokinetic Testing
"68 Degrees F — 29.92 Inches Of Mercury (Hg)
9/16/92
1145
1330
0.854
41,000
43.2
50.6
92.8
14.2
6.44
MBSLI-M25A-2
9/16/92
1518
1630
0.855
47,700
50.5
59.1
108
19.4
8.80
MBSLI-M25A-3
9/17/92
840
1030
0.863
46,300
24.4
28.3
51.9
9.00
4.08
Average
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.857
45,000
39.4
46.0
84.2
14.2
6.44
3-63
-------
TABLE 3-47
CARBON MONOXIDE, NITROGEN OXIDES, AND TOTAL HYDROCARBONS TEST SUMMARY
Surface EFB Outlet (1510)
•m
MBSLO-CEM-1
Test Date
Run Start Time
Run Finish Time
Dry Mole Fraction*
Air Flow Rate, SCFM, Dry*
CEM RESULTS
Carbon Monoxide
Concentration
parts per million, dry
milligrams / dry std. m3"
Emission Rale
Pounds per Hour
Kilograms per Hour
Nitrogen Oxides as NOj
Concentration
parts per million, dry
milligrams / dry std. m3**
Emission Rate
Pounds per Hour
Kilograms per Hour
Total Hydrocarbons***
Concentration
parts per million, wet
parts per million, dry
milligrams / dry std. m3**
Emission Rale
Pounds per Hour
Kilograms per Hour
* From Concurrent Isokinetic Testing
** 68 Degrees F - - 29.92 Inches Of Mercury (Hg)
*** As Propane
9/16/92
1145
1330
0.869
49,900
92.0
107
20.0
9.07
39.0
74.6
13.9
6.31
36.4
41.9
76.8
14.4
6.53
MBSLO-CEM-2
9/16/92
1518
1630
0.857
48,500
174
203
36.8
16.7
36.7
70.2
12.8
5.81
34.1
39.8
73.0
13.3
6.03
MBSLO-CEM-3
9/17/92
840
1030
0.876
_ 49,40Qaw9!,
45.8
53.3
9.87
4.48
33.8
64.6
12.0
5.44
20.8
23.7
.43.4
8.04
3.65
Average
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.861
» 49,30)
104
121
m
10.1
36.!
69,8
11)
5.8i
30,4
35.1
64.4
11.9
5.40
3-64
-------
TABLE 3-48
CARBON MONOXIDE, NITROGEN OXIDES. AND TOTAL HYDROCARBONS TEST SUMMARY
Core EFB Outlet (1520)
Test Date
Run Start Time
Run Finish Time
Dry Mole Fraction*
Air Flow Rate, SCFM, Dry*
CEM RESULTS
Nitrogen Oxides as NO.,
Concentration
parts per million, dry
milligrams / dry std. m***
Emission Rale
Pounds per Hour
Kilograms per Hour
Total Hydrocarbons***
Concentration
parts per million, wet
parts per million, dry
milligrams / dry std. m3**
Emission Rate
Pounds per Hour
Kilograms per Hour
•
Test Date
Run Start Time
Run Finish Time
Dry Mole Fraction*
Air Flow Rate, SCFM*, Dry*
CEM RESULTS
Carbon Monoxide
Concentration
parts per million, dry
milligrams / dry std. m3**
Emission Rate
Pounds per Hour
Kilograms per Hour
* Calculated from Concurrent
MBCLO-CEM-1
9/14/92
1723
1852
0.786
37,400
59.6
114
16.0
7.26
213
270
495
69.3
31.4
MBCLO-CEM-3
9/14/92
1407
1507
39,000
190
221
32.2
14.6
Isokinetic Testing
MBCLO-CEM-4
9/15/92
1648
1748
" 0.790
39,500
58.7
112
16.6
7.53
260
328
601
89.0
40.4
MBCLO-CEM-4
9/15/92
1648
1748
***• 39,500
232
269
39.9
18.1
MBCLO-CEM-5
9/15/92
1900
2000
0.767
38,700
50.9
97.3
14.1
6.40
352
459
841
122
55.3
MBCLO-CEM-5
9/15/92
1900
2000
38,700
220
256
37.1
16.8
Average
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.781
38,500
56.4
108
15.6
7.06
275
352
646
93.4
42.4
Average
N/A
N/A
N/A
39,100
214
249
36.4
16.5
"68 Degrees F - - 29.92 Inches Of Mercury (Hg)
*** As Propane
**** Average of Runs MBCLO
-M0011-2& MBCLO
-M0011-3
3-65
-------
TABLE 3-49
TOTAL HYDROCARBONS TEST SUMMARY
Microboard Press Slack 11 (DEF-1)
MBP11
Test Date
Run Start Time
Run Finish Time
Dry Mole Fraction*
Air Flow Rate, SCFM*, Dry
CEM RESULTS:
Total Hydrocarbons'*
Concentration
parts per million, wet
parts per million, dry
milligrams / dry std. m3***
Emission Rale
Pounds per Hour
Kilograms per Hour
* From Concurrent Isokinelic Testing
** As Propane
*•* 68 Degrees F -- 29.92 Inches Of Mercury
-M25A-1 MBP11-M25A-2 MBP11-M25A-3
9/19/92
1505
1800
_di©.963
8,030
38.7
40.2
73.7
2.22
1.01
(Hg)
9/2 1/92
1900
2003
0.960
6,910
45.6
47.5
87.1
2.25
1.02
9/22/92
1352
1545
0.976
7,420
48.4
49.6
90.9
2.53
1.15
Average
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.966
7,450
44.2
45.8
83.9
2.33
1.06
TABLE 3-50
TOTAL HYDROCARBONS TEST SUMMARY
Microboard Press Stack 12 (DEF-3)
MBP12-M25A-1 MBP12-M25A-2 MBP12-M25A-3
Test Dale
Run Start Time
Run Finish Time
Dry Mole Fraction*
Air Flow Rate, SCFM*, Dry
CEM RESULTS:
Total Hydrocarbons**
Concentration
parts per million, wet
parts per million, dry
milligrams /dry std. m3***
Emission Rale
Pounds per Hour
Kilograms per Hour
* From Concurrent Isokinelic Testing
** As Propane
* * * 68 Degrees F - - 29.92 Inches Of Mercury
9/19/92
1505
1800
0.969
11,100
28.0
28.9
53.0
2.20
1.00
(Hg)
9/2 1/92
1900
2003
0.967
11,000
51.9
53.7
98.4
4.06
1.84
9/22/92
1352
1545
0.972
11,200
47.3
48.7
89.3
3.75
1.70
Average
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.969
11,100
42.4
43.8
80.2
3.34
1.51
"3s
3-66
-------
* TABLE 3-51
TOTAL HYDROCARBONS TEST SUMMARY
Microboard Press Stack 13 (DEF-5)
MBP13-M25A-1 MRPn-M9-SA-2 MBP13-M25A-3
Test Date
Run Start Time
Run Finish Time
Dry Mole Fraction*
Air Flow Rate, SCFM*, Dry
CEM RESULTS:
Total Hydrocarbons* *
Concentration
parts per million, wet
parts per million, dry
milligrams / dry std. m3***
Emission Rate
Pounds per Hour
Kilograms per Hour
* From Concurrent Isokinetic Testing
•* As Propane
••• 68 Degrees F - - 29.92 Inches Of
9/19/92
1505
1800
0.959
9,600
29.6
30.9
56.6
2.04
' 0.925
Mercury (Hg)
9/21/92
1900
2003
0.968
9,580
29.8
30.8
56.5
2.03
0.921
9/22/92
1352
1545
0.977
9,960
39.7
40.6
74.4
2.78
1.26
Average
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.968
9,710
33.0
34.1
62.5
2.28
1.04
3-67
-------
TABLE 3-52
TOTAL HYDROCARBONS TEST SUMMARY
Microboard Cooling Room Slack 14 (DEF-7)
MBCR14-M25A-1 MBCR14-M25A-2
Test Dale
Run Start Time
Run Finish Time
Dry Mole Fraction*
Air Flow Rate, SCFM*, Dry
CEM RESULTS:
Total Hydrocarbons*'
Concentration
parts per million, wet
parts per million, dry
milligrams / dry std. m1***
Emission Rate
Pounds per Hour .
Kilograms per Hour
* From Concurrent Isokinetic Testing
** As Propane
*** 68 Degrees F -- 29.92 Inches Of Mercury (Hg)
9/22/92
1733
1900
0.967
14,400
14.5
15.0
27.5
1.48
0.671
9/22/92
1900
2105
0.970
15,300
13.5 •
13.9
25.5
1.46
0.662
Average
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.969
14,900
14.0
14.5
26.5
1.47
0.667
TABLE 3-53
TOTAL HYDROCARBONS TEST SUMMARY
Microboard Cooling-Room Stack 15 (DEF-8)
MBCR15-M25A-1
Test Date
Run Start Time
Run Finish Time
Dry Mole Fraction'
Air Flow Rale, SCFM*, Dry
CEM RESULTS:
Total Hydrocarbons'*
Concentration
parts per million, wet
parts per million, dry
milligrams /dry std. m3*"
Emission Rate
Pounds per Hour
Kilograms per Hour
* From Concurrent Isokinetic Tesling
"As Propane
' ' 68 Degrees F - - 29.92 Inches Of Mercury (Hg)
9/22/92
1733
1900
0.971
14,700
14.6
15.0
27.5
1.51
0.685
MBCR15-M25A-2
9/22/92
1900
2105
0.969
15,900
10.4
10.7
19.6
1.17
0.531
Average
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.970
15,300
13.0
12.9
23.6
1.34
0.608
3-68
-------
TABLE 3-54
TOTAL HYDROCARBONS TEST SUMMARY
Microboard Press Stacks 16,17,18 (DEF-2,4,6)
Test Date
Run Start Time
Run Finish Time
TOTAL HYDROCARBON CONG., ppm Wet*:
* As Propane
9/19/92
900
1000
MBP16-M25A-1
32.8
MBP17-M25A-1
22.3
MBP18-M25A-1
27.4
9/19/92
1022
1129
MBP16-M25A-2
34
MBP17-M25A-2
22.8
MBP18-M25A-2
27.0
9/21/92
1224
1505
MBP16-M25A-5
30.6
MBP17-M25A-5
21.5
MBP18-M25A-5
33.7
l_
9/21/92
1505
1800
MBP16-M25A-6A
31.6
MBP17-M25A-6A
20.8
MBP18-M25A-6A
38.3
N/A
N/A
N/A
Average
32.3
21.9
31.6
16-Apt-M
-------
TABLE 3-55
VOLATILE ORGANIC EMISSIONSSUMMARY
MDF Cyclone Outlet (DB)
MDFCO-M0030-1
Test Date
Run Start -Finish Time
Volumetric Air Flow Rates, SCFM*
B- Prone
Mg per dry std. cubic meter**
ppb by volume. Dry
lulograms per hour
pounds per hour
A-Pinene
Mg per dry std. cubic meter**
ppb by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
Methyiene Chloride
Mg per dry std. cubic meter**
ppb by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
Trichloroftuoromethane
Mg per dry std. cubic meter* *
ppb by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
Chforomethane
Mg per dry std. cubic meter"
ppb by volume. Dry
kuograms per hour
pounds per Dour
n-Heione
Mg per dry std. cubic meter* *
0 ppb by volume. Dry
kuograms per hour
pounds per hour
Acetone
Mg per dry std. cubic meter"
ppb by volume. Dry
lulograms per hour
pounds per hour
Isooctane
Mg per dry std. cubic meter"
ppb by volume. Dry
lulograms per hour
pounds per hour
P-Cymene
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*'
ppb by volume. Dry
kBognum per hour
pounds per Hour
Toluene
Mg per dry std. cubic meter"
ppb by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
2-Butanone
Mg per dry std. cubic meter**
ppb by volume. Dry
kuograms per hour
pounds per hour
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Mg per dry std. cubic meter**
ppb by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
Chloroform
Mg per dry std. cubic meter"
ppo by volume, Dry
kuograms per hour
pounds per hour
Styrcne
Mg per dry std. cubic meter"
ppb by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
m-/p-Xylene
Mg per dry ltd. cubic meter"
ppb by volume. Dry
lulograms per hour
pounds per hour
Bromomelhane
• Mg per dry std. cubic meter* *
ppb by volume. Dry
lulograms per hour
pounds per hour
Cumene (isopropytbenzene)
Mg per dry std. cubic meter**
ppb by volume, Dry
lulograms per hour
pounds per hour
Carbon Disulfide
Mg per dry std. cubic meter**
ppb by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
* From Concurrent Isolunelic Sampling
" 68 Deg. P (20 C) 29.92 In. Mercury
9-26-92
1135-1415
92.600
130
23.0
0.0205
0.0452
132
23.3
0.0208
0.0458
67.8
19.2
0.0107
0.0235
82.1
14.4
0.0129
0.0285
41.7
19.9
0.00657
0.0145
62.3
17.4
0.00980
j 0.0216
29.5
12.2
0.00464
0.0102
27.4
5.77
0.00431
0.00951
3.90
0.699
0.000613
0,00135
5.70
1.49
0.000897
0.00198
3.98
133
0.000626
0.00138
2.68
0.483
0.000421
0.000929
0.325
0.0655
0.0000511
0,000113
130
0.300
0.000204
0.000451
130
0.294
0.000204
0.000451
1.64
0.417
0.000259
0.000571
130
0.260
0.000204
0.000451
0325
0.103
0.0000511
0.000113
MDPCO-M0030-2 MDFOO-M0030-3
9-26-92
1625-1812
88300
166
293
0.0249
0.0549
172
30.4
0.0259
0.0570
13.8
3.91
0.00207
0.00456
5.76
1.01
0.000864
0.00191
41.2
19.6
0.00618
0.0134S
5.03 .
1.41
0.000755
0.00167
25.8
10.7
0,00387
0.00853
234
0.493
0.000351
0.000775
4.46
0.800
0.000670
0.00148
2.69
0.702
0.000404
0.000890
2.01
0.669
0.000301
0.000664
1.69
0.304
0.000253
0.000558
0.240
0.0483
0.0000360
0.0000793
0.840
0.232
0.000151
0.000332
0.824
0.227
0.000151
0.000332
1.04
0.282
0.000167
0.000368
0.759
0.205
0.000115
0.000253
0.240
0.0758
0.0000360
0.0000793
9-27-92
955-1125
85.400
146
010212
0.0468 ,
133
23.4
0.0193
0.0425
131
37.2
0.0191
0.0420
44.8
7.85
0.00650
0.0143
21.2
10.1
0.00308
0.00678
29.9
834
0.00433
0.00955
242
10.0
0.00351
0.00774
13.7
2.89
0.00199
0.00439
3.83
0.686
0.000555
0.00122
2.61
0.681
0.000378
0.000834
1.89
0.630
0.000274
0.000604
1.89
0.342
0.000275
0.000606
5.15
1.04
0.000748
0.00165
0.968
0223
0.000140
0.000309
0.968
0.219
0.000140
0.000309
0.240
OUSJB
0.0000364
0.0000802
f
0.713
0.143
0.000103
0.000228
0.489
0.146
0.0000670
0.000148
Average
88.767
...-,' i48.
••••"•. 26.1
0.0222
0.0490
146
25.7
0.0220
0.0484
71.0
20.1
0.0106
0.0234
44.2
7.74
0.00676
0.0149
34.7
16.5
0.00528
0.0116.
32.4
9.05
0.004%
0.0109
26.5
11.0
O.OW01
0.00384
14.5
3.05
0.00222
0.00489
4.06
0.729
0.000613
0.00135
3.67
0.957
0.000560
0.00123
2.62
0.875
0.000400
0.000882
2.09
0.376
0.000316
0.000697
1.90
0.385
0.000278
0.000614
1.04
0.252
0.000165
0.000364
L03
0247
0.000165
0.000364
0.975
0.253
0.000154
0.000340
0.924
0.203
0.000141
0.000311
0351
0.103
0.0000514
0.000113
Underlined values indicate all catch weights are less than the minimum detection limit (MDL). Values presented acre calculated
using 1/2 the MDL for all catch wights.
3-70
-------
TABLE 3-56
VOLATILE ORGANIC EMISSIONS SUMMARY
Surface EFB Outlet
Ten Date
Run Surt-Pinub Time
Volumetric Air Flow Rales, SCFM •
TEST RESULTS:
A-Pioeoe
»C ffttrfat, cubic meter* •
•pb by volume. Dry
•tflocraiu per bour
pound* per hour
B-Piocnc
MC per dry rtd. cubic meter* '
ppb by volume. Dry
kilofrtmt per bour
pounds per bour
Acetone
PC. per dry ttd. cubic »«cer* *
ppb by volua«v Dry
kttocrans P*1" **our
pounds per bour
Toluene
MC per dry std. cubic meter"
ppb by volume. Dry
kilocrems per bour
pounds per bour
Chloroactbuc
MC per dry 4ld. cubic meter* *
ppb by volume. Dry
kHofn ms per bour
pounds per bour
m/p-Xytene
MC per dry std. cubic meter**
ppb by volume. Dry
Lilofnms per bour
pounds per bour
Methyl eoe Chloride
MC per dry std. cubic meter* *
ppb by volume^ Dry
kilograms per bour
pounds per.bour
P-Cymene
MC per dry std, cubic meter**
ppb by volume. Dry
kilocrams per bour
pounds per bour
TncbJorofittoremctbane
MC per dry ctd. cubic meter* *
ktiocnns per nour
pounds per bour
n-Hojioe -
a • - ' . • -
PK pv, •*, j L.*,- *->~j- -- j- ~-*.-i
ppb by volume. Dry
kilocnms per bour
no-J-rf.---^"- '•-fvir
•*t t.*t ^i/ ~t.~. w«uic ui«tei'**
ppb by voluac. Dry
Uotraosperbour
pounds per hour
* Prom Concurrent Isocjnetic Testinc
** 68 Dec. r (20 C) 2«.v2 In. Mercury
Underlined values indicate all catcb wcicbu arc lei
usinc 1/2 tbe M DL (or all Caleb veicbts.
MBSLO-M0030-1
9-17-92
1229-1348
47.900
21,100
4070
\M
4.14
^*»
10300
1810
O^W
1J4
ISiO
134
0.129
0^83
93.5
24.4
OJXn6\
0^)168
0.171
0.0«I5
tuppcm
OJ000307
10.3
2.34
OJQOO&42
OJ»186
«4D
18.1
0.00521
O0115
77.6
13.9
0.00632
OJJ139
0.171
0.0299
OJOOOI39
OJ0000307
Qf>477
0.0000 139
0.0000307
0.171
OJ360
0.0000139
0.0000307
is than tbc miniraum detection
MBSLO-M0030-2 MBSLO-M0030-3
9-17-92
1717-1832
5 1.900
33,700
5950
2-«7
._*' '•*
12900
2270
1.13
2.50
UT70
691
fl.147
OJ24
60.7
15^
OXIOS35
OJ1I18
1930
920
0.170
0.37J
19.9
4.51
0X10176
0.00387
»3
S4j6
0/J170
OJ375
71.0
12.7
0.00624
OJJIJ8
0.332
JX»569
0.0000293
0.0000645
Q.332
OJ927
0.0000293
0.0000645
OJ3J2
OJ699
QjQ000293
0.0000645
imit (MDL). Values presented were calculated
9-18-92
1225-1336
12.900
V.100
4*00
134
*•»:
7870
1390
0.708
1.56
1430
5W
0.12ST
0^284
34.3
«.95
OJM308
OJXK79
0.301
0.143
0.0000270
0.0000596
0.301
0,0682.
0.0000270
0.0000596
Tin
su
0^)182
OXMOI
164
29.3
0.0147
0.0324
0.301
OJS27
0.0000270
0.0000596
gjoj
Q.0840
0.0000270 •
0X1000596
OJOJ.
0.0543
OJQ00270
0.00005«6
Average
N/A
N/A
50,900
77,800
4,830
2,40
JJS
10,400
1^20
0.892
1.97
LS60
646
fl.135
a.297
62J
\6J
0X0535
OJJ1IS
644
307
0.0568
0.125
102
2J1
OXC0876
OXU193
153
43J
OXH35
0X1297
104
18.6
0X10909
0.0200
OJ&8
0X498
0X1000234
0.0000516
0.2&8
0X1748
OXM00234
0X10005 16
flj£8
0X1514
0.0000234
OXW0051£
3-71
-------
TABLE 3-57
VOLATILE ORGANIC EMISSIONS SUMMARY
Core EFB Outlet (1520)
URCtO-Mnn.in-1 MBCl O-MO030-2 MBCLO-M0030-3 *„.„..
Test Date
Run Sun-Pinish Time
Volumetric Air Plow Rates. SCFM*
TEST RESULTS:
A-Pineoe
>ij per dry std. cubic meter*
ppb by wtume, Dry
kilo&inu pec hour
pounds per hour
B-Pinene
fig per dry std. cubic meterc
ppbbyvoliur- Dry
kilograms per bour
pounds per nour
Acetooe
>fg per -dry std. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilogram* pec bour
pound* per hour
Toluene
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilograms per bour
pounds per bour
P-Cymene
fig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilogram* per bour
pounds per bour
m— /p— Xylene
fig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilograms per bour
pounds per bour
Benzene
fig pa- dry std. cubjcmeter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilograms per bour
pounds per boor
Cumene (i*opropyl benzene)
Mg per dry ud. cubic meur*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilogram* per bour
pound* per hour
MetbyteoeCtakride
fig per dry scd. eobic meter*
ppb by \olume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pound* per bour
2-Butanone
fig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
Chkrometnaoe
jig per dry *td. cobic meter *
ppb byvotume. Dry
kilograms per bour
pounds per bour
lodomethane
„. „,, J-, r,j _,,!.;, _ „,.,.
•u.w^'ii^iij^a i^,—
pounds per bour
o— Xylene
fig per dry ad. cubic meter*
k*4vgl •*••—•' K»* -—^
pounds per hour
Styrene
fig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilograms per bour
pounds per hour
Isoocune
fig per dry nd. cubic meter*
ppb by wtume. Dry
kilograms per bour
pound* per hour
Chloroform
Mg per dry std. cubic meur*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilogram* per hour
pounds per bour
* 68 Deg. P (20 C) — 29.92 In. Mercury
Underlined values indicate all catch weights are la
using 1/2 the MDL for all catcb weighu.
9-17-92
1219-1446
48.600
21,700
3840
•1.80-
3.96
15000
2640
124
2.73
4210
1740
0348
0.767
698
182
0.0577
0.127
391
70.1
0.0323
0.0713
319
72J
0.0264
0.0581
314
96.7
0.0259
04572
89.8
18.0
0.00742
0.0164
17.1
4.83
• 040141
0.00311
852
28.4
0.00705
0.0155
42.7
20J
0.00353
0.00778
41.4
7.02
0.00342
0.00755
234
521
0.00190-
040419
17.5
4.04
0.00145
0.00319
7.61
1.60
0.000629
040139
2.01
0.406
0.000166
0.000367
is than the minimum detecuon limn (MDL).
9-17-92
1804-1948
51,900
141400
24900
12^'
27.4
74100
13100
6.54
14.4
20300
8380
1.78
3.93
1440
375
0.127
0279
1230
220
0.108
0239
269
61.0
0.0237
0.0523
0.520
0.160
04000458
0400101
90.5
18.1
0.00797
0.0176
161
4S.7
• «4142
04314
0.520
0.173
0.000046
0.000101
0.520
0248
0.0000458
0.000101
0320
0.0881
0.0000458
0.000101
0.520
0.118
O.OOOCW58
0.000101
•
0.520
0.120
0.0000458
0.000101
0320
0.109
0.0000458
0.000101
11.4
229
0.00100
0.00221
Values presented were calculated
9-18-92
1255-1455
53,000
135,000
.••••: :-' - ZW* •::.-;• .
x:12.1 •- :
.24.7
71000
12500
6.39
14.1
29800
12300
2^8
$.91
1910
497
0.171
OJ78
1210
217
0.109
0248
852
193
0.0766
0.169
0.481
0.148
0.0000433
0.0000955
209
41.9
0.0188
0.0415
231
653
04208
0.0459
0.481
0.161
0.0000433
0.0000955
0.4SI
0229
0.0000433
0.0000955
0.481
0.0816
0.0000433
0.0000955
343
7.90
040314
0.00691
28.3
634
040255
0.00562
0.481
0.101
0.0000433
0.0000955
0.481
04970
0.0000433
0.0000955
— ^m
51,11!
• " ' W«
W
- ^ : 111
5i«l
Wll
1.5
111
inn
?ffl
l.S
Ml
Uil
J!l
«.11I
OI'I
M
11)
MSI
D.III
<•>.
K
n.n
O.N
IB
JU
QJM^
Mltl
m
2SJ
0.0111
0.0251
1M
w
§j)12j
^jj2jj
tt)
Wt
o.ooa
0.00521
' W
Ul
fi.OOUl
0^0264
1U
u
040111
0.00151
1W
Ml
> «.oora
HMTi}
1SJ
Wl
0.00 Di
O.M291
HI
MM i
0,000131 ;
0.006SH
U
O.SJ1
o.ooo«n
O.OOOM ;
j
3-72
_i——<•—j
-------
SECTION 4
SAMPLING LOCATIONS
4.1 GENERAL
Emission sampling was conducted at: (1) the MDF cyclone outlet; (2) five roof vents on the
MDF particleboard press; (3) microboard core dryer EFB and microboard surfac^jdryer
EFB inlets and outlets; (4) six roof stacks exhausting the microboard press room; and, (5)
two roof stacks exhausting the microboard press cooling room. Schematics are presented
for each of the locations sampled. The test program was focused primarily on flue gas
sampling. There was no requirement for any process stream sample collection during the
program.
SAMPLING LOCATION PARAMETERS
Table 4-1 is a summary of the sampling location parameters which includes figure numbers,
duct (stack) diameters, upstream and downstream flow disturbance distances from sampling
ports, and number of sampling points.
43 SAMPLING LOCATIONS DESCRIPTIONS
Several of the exhaust ducts required installation of specially designed and constructed stack
extensions. The extensions were built and installed by a local contractor under the
supervision of WEYCO and WESTON. It was not economically feasible to install a stack
extension at the MDF cyclone outlet.
4.3.1 MDF Cyclone Outlet
There are two MDF particle dryers. Dryer B cyclone outlet (siacK. #i) was cnosen for
emissions testing. The duct is locate — —- --,--•--•'. *~- ceet above grade. This location
does not meet the miumaum wiu^u, ^^n*^ ^ ^r^ Keference Method 1 for distances
from flow disturbances. This is important to note regarding the isokinetic testing, as it likely
affects the accuracy of the sample collection and flow measurements. Refer to Section 3
for a discussion of the test results at this sampling location. Figure 4-1 presents a schematic
of the sampling location.
4-1
-------
TABLE 4-1
SAMPLING LOCATION PARAMETERS
Sampling
Location
MDF Cyclone B
Outlet (Stack 1)
MDF Press
Stack 2
Stack 3
Stack 4
Stack 5
Stack 6
Core EFB
Inlet (Stack 7)
Outlet (Stack 8)
Surface EFB
Inlet (Stack 9)
Outlet (Stack 10)
Microboard Press
Stacks 11, 12,
13, 14, 15
Figure #
4-1
4-3
4-4
4-5
4-6
4-7
4-8
4-9
4-8
4-9
4-11
Duct
Diameter,
Inches
91.75
29
29
37
62
56 (square)
49.25
53.25
50.0
53.25
33
Flow Disturbance
Distance, Feet
Upstream
•&
14
14
6.3
10.3
7.3
2.0
33.3
2.2
33'.3
8.3
Downstream
3
5.6
10.3
1.6
2.4
2.3
2.3
26.6
4.0
26.6
1.3
Number of
Sampling
Points
24
24
24
24
24
25
24
12
24
12
24
4-2
-------
o
B
From
Dryer
Cyclone
(OB)
91.76'
TRAVERSE
POMT
NUMBER
1
2
3
4
6
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
DISTANCE
FROM INSIDE
NEAR WALL
(INCHES)
63/4
97/8
146/8
20
263/4
363/8
627/8
726/8
79 1/4
843/4
893/8
93 1/2
Section N-N
Drawing Not to Scale
Figure 4-1
MDF Dryer B Cyclone Outlet Sampling Location (DB)
HQ41.WEY
4-3
-------
432 MDF Press Exhausts
As shown in Figure 4-2, there are a total of five exhausts (stacks #2 - #6) for the MDF
press area located on a metal roof that is slightly pitched. Each test location met the
minimum criteria specified in EPA Reference Method 1 for distances from flow
disturbances.
43.2.1 Press Hood Stacks
Stacks #2 and #3, shown in Figures 4-3 and 4-4, respectively, exhaust gases from the MDF
press hood. The stacks run vertically approximately 10 feet above the roof level.
4322 Press Building Area Roof Exhausts
Stacks #4 and #5, shown in Figures 4-5 and 4-6, respectively, remove air from the room
containing the MDF press. To provide suitable test locations, stack extensions were built.
The stacks run vertically approximately 15 feet above the roof level. For each stack
extension, two 4-inch sample ports were installed. Scaffolding was built to access the sample
ports.
4.323 Press Cooling End Exhaust Stack
The press cooling end exhaust stack sampling location (stack #6), as shown in Figure 4-7,
had a gooseneck extension that was removed and an extension was installed to provide a
suitable sampling location. Five 4-inch sample ports were installed in the stack. The stack
runs vertically approximately 6 feet above the roof level.
4.33 Microboard Core Layer and Surface Layer Particle Dryers
Testing was completed simultaneously at the inlet and outlet sampling locations of the core
and surface EFB'G to determine PM10 and total hydrocarbon removal efficiency.
4-4
-------
WMM
WIW-3
WtW-6
WIW-2
Cooing
MDFPrm
MAT Forming Machln
Conveyor
Figure 4-2
MDF Press Building
4-5
-------
29'
67"
,
N
"141
\
t
1
0
From Press Hood
1
N
N ^Q"
^^^r" • "^^^^
/ • \
Aj 1*** • • • * • • •••
\ * /
\ * ** /
* ^^^^^ * ^S
r^r"
B
Section N-N
ISOKENmC
SAMPUNG
TRAIN
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
DISTANCE
FROM INSIDE
NEAR WALL
(INCHES)
1
1 7/8
33/8
5 1/8
71/4
10 1/4
183/4
21 3/4
237/8
257/8
27 1/8
28
PM 10
SAMPLING
TRAIN
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
1
2
3
4
5
6
DISTANCE
FROM INSIDE
NEAR WALL
(INCHES)
1 1/4
41/4
85/8
203/8
243/4
273/4
Drawing Not to Scale
Figure 4-3
MDF Press Stack #2 Sampling Location (WIW-2)
4-6
F1Q43.WEY
-------
29"
124
"I41
From Pro** Hood
B
Section N-N
ISOKENIT1C
SAMPLING
TRAIN
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
1
2
3
4
6
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
DISTANCE
FROM INSIDE
NEAR WALL
(INCHES)
1
1 7/8
33/8
5 1/8
7 1/4
10 1/4
183/4
21 3/4
237/8
257/8
27 1/8
28
PM 10
SAMPLING
TRAIN
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
1
2
3
4
5
6
DISTANCE
FROM INSIDE
NEAR WALL
(INCHES)
1 1/4
41/4
86/8
203/8
243/4
273/4
Drawing Not to Scale
Figure 4-4
MDF Press Stack #3 Sampling Location (WIW-1)
F1QUR4-4.WEY
4-7
-------
37-
1
r
20-
1
75*
1
0
1
I
From MDF Pnmm Room
Fan
1
i
K
•«—
1
Row
Straightening
Vanes
77"
Ai !*•• •
\
X
•
\
—
«
»-^.
• •
t
•
•
B~
*•».
•
r
—
•
—
N
•
X
N
*
/
\
Section N-N
(Isokinotic Sampling Train Points)
-
ISOKENETIC
SAMPLING
TRAIN
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
DISTANCE
FROM INSIDE
NEAR WALL
(INCHES)
1
21/2
43/8
61/2
91/4
131/8
237/8
273/4
30 1/2
325/8
341/2
36
PM10
SAMPLING
TRAIN
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
1
2
3
4
6
DISTANCE
FROM INSIDE
NEAR WALL
(INCHES)
1 5/8
53/8
11
26
Drawing Not to Scale
Figure 4-5
MOF Press Stack #4 Sampling Location (WIW-5)
4-8
RQUR4-6.WEY
-------
62'
29'
124'
From MOF Pm> Room
Fan
ISOKENET1C
SAMPLING
TRAIN
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
1
2
3
4
6
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
DISTANCE
FROM INSIDE
NEAR WALL
(INCHES)
1 1/4
41/8
73/8
11
161/2
22
4O
46
61
646/8
577/8
603/4
Row
Straightening
Vanes
PM 10
SAMPLING
TRAIN
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
1
2
3
4
6
6
DISTANCE
FROM INSIDE
NEAR WALL
(INCHES)
23/4
9
183/8
436/8
63
691/4
Section N-N
(Isokinetic Sampling Train Points)
Drawing Not to Scale
Figure 4-6
MDF Press Stack #5 Sampling Location (WIW-3)
RGUH44.WEY
4-9
-------
56"
28"
88'
B
r
N
ISOKENETIC
SAMPUNG
TRAIN
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
1
2
3
4
s
DISTANCE
FROM INSIDE
NEAR WALL
(INCHES)
66/8
163/4
28
391/4
603/8
From Press Cooling End
PM 10
SAMPLING
TRAIN
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
1
2
3
4
DISTANCE
FROM INSIDE
NEAR WALL
(INCHES)
7
21
36
49
Note: Ports A, C, & E wars sampled
for PM10 amissions
A B C D E
Section N-N
(Isokinatic Sampling Train Points)
Drawing Not to Scale
Figure 4-7
MDF Press Stack #6 Sampling Location (WIW-4)
FK3UR4-7.WEY
4-10
-------
4.3.3.1 Core EFB Inlet
Figure 4-8 is a schematic of the core EFB inlet sampling location (stack #7). This duct runs
horizontally and is accessed from a platform approximately 100 feet above grade. There is
an abort gate adjacent to the sampling location that was locked shut during the test
program. This location did not meet the minimum criteria specified hi EPA Reference
Method 1 for distances from flow disturbances. This is important to note regarding the
isokinet' ., T-stfrr- as the accuracy of the sample collection and flow measurements may be
affected.
Core EFB Outlet
Figure 4-9 is a schematic of the core EFB outlet sampling location (stack #8). This duct
runs vertically and is accessed from a platform approximately 100 feet above grade. This
location met the minimum criteria specified in EPA Reference Method 1 for distances from
flow disturbances.
4.3.3.3 Surface EFB Inlet and Outlet
The surface EFB inlet sampling location (stack #9) is similar to the core EFB inlet
sampling location. Refer to Figure 4-8 for a schematic of the sampling location. The
surface EFB outlet sampling location (stack #10) is identical to the core EFB outlet
sampling location. Refer to Figure 4-9 for a schematic of the sampling location.
4.3.4 Microboard Press Room and Cooling Area
For the microboard press, there are a total of eight identical exhausts, as shown in Figure
4-10, located on two different roofs. Six exhausts (stacks #11 - #13, #16 - #18) service the
area above the microboard press. Two exhausts (stacks #14 and #15) serve the cooling
area. In order to provide suitable test locations, stack extensions were built. The stacks,
run vertically approximately 10 feet above the roof level, as shown in Figure 4-11. These
locations met the minimum criteria specified in EPA Reference Method 1 for distances from
disturbances. Scaffolding was necessary to access the sample ports. To access each stack,
two 4-inch ports were installed at 90°.
4-11
-------
60*
Section L-L
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
1
2
3
4
6
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
DISTANCE
FROM INSIDE
NEAR WALL
(INCHES)
1
33/8
66/8
87/8
12 1/2
173/4
32 1/4
37 1/2
41 1/8
44 1/8
406/8
49
From
Cydono*
-------
26'
O
A
42'
64-
-H
TRAVERSE
POWT
NUMBER
1
2
3
4
E
6
DISTANCE
FROM INSIDE
NEAR WALL
(INCHES)
66/8
12
20
41 3/4
493/4
66 1/8
From
Note: Core EFB outlet tact location ta Uantfcal to nrfaca EFB ouflot.
Drawing Not to Scale
Figure 4-9
EFB Outlet Sampling Location (1510 or 1520)
wa27rept\drawing*\figur4-9 .way
4-13
-------
Top View
13&18 12&17 11&16
15 14
n n
Q_£I
(DEF5&6) (DEF 38,4) (DEF 1&2)
(DEF 8) (DEF 7)
Cooling Rack
Parddeboard
MAT Forming Machine
T
Convayor
Side View
Drawing Not to Seal*
Rgure 4-10
Microboard Press Building
4-14
-------
1
*
3'
'
i
T
33-
i
o
1
1
•From MDF Pren (loom
Fan
1
h
^*—
1
Flow
_ Straightening
Vanes
m 33' *
/
A
Al !•
/
/
\
/
\.
\
^*
-«,
^—
-1
'
*
\
1
\
4
\
4
4
•
r
— •,
•***
-^
X
s
\
/
\
\
"l
/
SactionN-N
(ItokvMtic Sampling Traki PointE)
Microboard Press & Cooling Room Stacks Are Identical
ISOKENETIC
SAMPLING
TRAIN
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMPW
1
2
3
4
6
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
DISTANCE
FROM INSIDE
NEAR WALL
(INCHES)
1
21/4
33/8
63/4
8 1/4
11 3/4
21 3/4
243/4
27 1/4
29 1/8
303/4
32
PM 10
SAMPLING
TRAIN
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
1
2
3
4
6
6
DISTANCE
FROM INSIDE
NEAR WALL
(INCHES)
1 1/2
47/8
63/4
23 1/4
28 1/8
31 1/2
-
Drawing Not to Scale
Figure 4-11
Microboard Press and Cooling Room Stack Sampling Location (DEF)
HQUR411.WEY
4-15
-------
SECTION 5
SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
5.1 OVERVIEW OF FLUE GAS SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PROCEDURES
Aldehyde/ketones, condensible participate, PM^, paniculate, semivolatile organic, and
volatile organic samples were recovered on-site at the field laboratory. Carbon monoxide,
total hydrocarbon, and nitrogen oxide samples were monitored continuously during each test
repetition using WESTON's on-site CEMS instrumentation trailer. Appendix C contains the
reference methods and a complete description of equipment and procedures (extracted from
40 CFR 60).
52 SAMPLING POINTS
EPA Method 1 criteria was used to determine the number and location of the sampling
points.
5.3 VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATES
5J.1 Flue Gas Velocity
EPA Method 2 was utilized to obtain the velocity measurements during the traverses of the
stack (duct) cross sections. For the MDF cyclone outlet, cyclonic flow was present. The
flow yaw angle at each sample point was measured with an angle finder and the pitot tubes
were aligned parallel to the flow. The flow at each point was measured and weighted by
the cosine of the yaw angle. The resultant flows for each point were used to calculate the
gas velocity.
532 Flue Gas Composition
The flue gas molecular weight was determined by EPA Method 3 at the core EFB and
surface EFB inlets and outlets. At all other sampling locations, the flue gas composition
was assumed to be that of ambient air, as confirmed with Fyrite analyzers.
5-1
-------
5.3.3 Flue Gas Moisture Content
Moisture content was determined by analyzing the sampling train impinger contents
according to the procedures outlined in the respective EPA Methods.
5.4 POLLUTANT EMISSIONS DETERMINATIONS
5.4.1 Aldehvde/Ketones
The aldehyde and ketone emissions from all sampling locations were determined by EPA
Method 0011. The sampling train, as shown in Figure 5-1, consisted of the following
components connected in series:
• A calibrated borosilicate nozzle attached to a borosilicate probe.
• A rigid borosilicate connector to join the outlet of the sample probe to the inlet of
the impinger train.
• An impinger tram consisting of four impingers. The first three impingers contained
100 ml of cleaned 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH) solution. The fourth
impinger contained 300 grams of the dry preweighed silica gel. The second
impinger was a Greenburg-Smith type; aU other impingers were of a modified
design. All impingers were maintained in a crushed ice bath.
• A vacuum line (umbilical cord) with adapter to connect the outlet of the impinger
train to a control module.
• A control module containing a 3-cfm carbon vane vacuum pump (sample gas
mover), a calibrated dry gas meter (sample gas volume measurement device), a
calibrated orifice (sample gas flow rate monitor) and inclined manometers (orifice
and gas stream pressure indicators).
• A switchable calibrated digital pyrometer to monitor flue and sample gas
temperatures.
The preparation, sampling, and recovery procedures used for determination of
formaldehyde, aldehydes, and ketones are shown in Figure 5-2, 5-3 and 5-4, respectively.
Each test was 60 to 90 minutes in duration and at least 45 dry standard cubic feet of sample
volume was collected. All runs were isokinetic ± 10 percent.
5-2
-------
THERMOMETER
THERMOCOUPLE
PROBE
TIP
IMPINQERS WITH
ABSORBINQ SOLUTION:
REVERSE TYPE
PITOT TUBE
CHECK
VALVE
SILICA QEL
2 to 4 IMPINQERS WITH DNPH SOLUTION
PITOT
MANOMETER
TEMPERATURE
SENSORS
ORIFICE
1 h
L J
f ^^
r^>i
/
t
\
^-^
-^-^
\
i
BY-
BY-PASS VALVE
rFfxki
VACUUM
OAUQE
MAIN
VALVE
VACUUM LINE
ORIFICE
MANOMETER
\
DRY GAS
METER
I-1
I-1
FIGURE 5-1
EPA METHOD 0011
ALDEHYDE/KETONE SAMPLING TRAIN
-------
GLASSWARE
REMOVE SURFACE RESIDUE
WTTH HOT SOAPY WATER. RINSE
WTTH TAP WATER FOLLOWED
BY DISTILLED WATER.
RINSE WITH NANOQRADE
MEONYLENE CHLORIDE
DRY FOR 1 HOUR IN OVEN AT
106*C. SEAL ENDS WITH '
GLASS. TEFLON OR FOIL
TRANSPORT TO TEST SITE
CHARGE IMPINGER TRAIN
INLET AND OUTLET OF
SAMPLING NOZZLE. PROBE
IMP1NGERS NO. 1&2:
100 ml DNPH SOLUTION
IMPINGERS NO. 3&4:
1OO ml DNPH SOLUTION
IMPINGER NO. 5: (optional)
100 ml DNPH SOLUTION
IMPINGER NO. 6:
300 a SILICA GEL
SEAL SAMPLING TRAIN COMPONENTS
WTTH GROUND GLASS PLUGS OR
CAPS TO PREVENT CONTAMINATION
INLET TO IMPINGER NO. 1
AND OUTLET TO IMPINGER NO. 4
TRANSPORT SAMPLING TRAIN
COMPONENTS TO SAMPLING
SfTE
FIGURE 5-2
PREPARATION PROCEDURES FOR
ALDEHYDE/KETONE SAMPLING TRAINS
5-4
-------
ATTACH NOZZLE TO PROBE
AND PROBE TO IMPINQER
TRAM WITH
BOROSIUCATE TUBING.
ATTACH SAMPUNQ
TRAIN COMPONENTS AT
SAMPUNQ SJTE
ZERO MCUNED MANOMETERS.
CONNECT UMBIUCAL TO
CONTROL MODULE AND TO
IMPINQER NO. 4 OUTLET
LU
THAW AT II- Hg. LEAK CHECK
PITOT / UNE» FBI METHOD 2.
RECORD LEAK RATE ON FIELD
DATA SHEET; MUST BE OS02 cfm.
PROBE AND OVEN
HEATERS 260 °F
TURN ON PROBE AND OVEN
HEATERS AND ADD ICE TO
IMPINQER TRAIN.
TEAM LEADER CHECK
WITH PROCESS OBSERVER
FOR START TIME
PROCESS OBSERVER CHECK
THAT PROCESS
IS OPERATING NORMALLY
PROBE POSITIONED H
STACK AT RRST
SAMPUNQ POINT
RECORD CLOCK TH*. MITUL
DRY QAS METER, AP. T, AND, T M
VALUES. FOR ISOKJNETIC SAMPUNO
DETERMINE AH. SET AH AT ORIFICE
METER. READ REMAINWG
QAUQES.
REMOVE SAMPLE PORT CAP.
INSERT PROBE THROUGH PORT.
SEAL PORT.
START TEST
AT DESIGNATED
START TIME
RECORD DATA ON FIELD
DATA SHEET AT EACH
POINT.
PROCESS OBSERVER
CHECKING
THROUGHOUT THE TEST
SAMPLE
EACH POINT ON
TRAVERSE
•TOP 1AJWLMO AFTER COMtETMQ
TRAVERSE AND REMOVE PROSE
FROMCTACK.
RECORD FINAL DRY
QAS METER READING
AND LEAK CHECK.
TRANSFER SAMPUNQ TRAIN
TO NEXT SAMPLE PORT
AND REPEAT PROCEDURE.
AT COMPLETION OF TEST,
LEAK CHECK TRAIN AS
PREVIOUSLY INDICATED AND
RECORD VALUE. SEAL OPENINGS
AND TRANSPORT TO FIELD
LABORATORY FOR RECOVERY.
FIGURE 5-3
SAMPLING PROCEDURES FOR
ALDEHYDES/KETONES
5-5
-------
NOZZLE. PROBE
CONNECTORS, IMPINQERS
NO. 1. 2, AND 3
DRAIN ANY CONDENSATE INTO
NO. 1 IMPINGER
CONNECTORS. IMPINQERS
NO. 1. 2. AND 3
MEASURE VOLUME AND RECORD
RINSE WHILE BRUSHING WFTH
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
RINSE WHILE BRUSHING WTTH
METHYLENE CHLORIDE AND
HPLC WATER
TRANSFER SOLUTION TO LABELED
BOTTLE PROBE WASH
ADD WASHINGS TO LABELED AMBER
BOROSIUCATE BOTTLE
FINAL RINSE OF CONNECTORS
WITH METHYLENE CHLORIDE AND
WATER
WASH IMPINQERS AND
CONNECTORS WITH
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
ADD WASHINGS TO PROBE/
IMPINGERS SAMPLE BOTTLE
ADD WASH TO BOTTLE & SEAL
SEAL BOTTLE. MARK LIQUID LEVEL
COMPLETE CUSTODY FORM,
SECURE SAMPLE
FIGURE 5-4
SAMPLE RECOVERY PROCEDURES FOR
ALDEHYDE/KETONE SAMPLING TRAINS
5-6
-------
The analytical procedures for the quantification of aldehydes and ketones were performed
as specified in EPA Methods 0011 and 0011A utilizing high-performance liquid
chromatography (HPLC). The Method 0011A analysis steps for the determination of
aldehydes and ketones are summarized in Figure 5-5.
5.4.2 Carbon Monoxide. Nitrogen Oxides, and Total Hydrocarbons
The WESTON ^rtable CEM system was used to continuously monitor the?«oncentrations
«<§&&&
of carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides and total hydrocarbons at the core EFB and the
surface EFB outlets. The total hydrocarbon emissions were measured at the MDF press
stacks, microboard press stacks, core EFB and surface EFB inlets and the MDF cyclone
outlet.
The portable CEM system contained an instrument rack, a data acquisition system, and a
microcomputer. The instrument rack contained continuous emission analyzers, sample
conditioning units, recorders, and a data acquisition system. The following parameters were
determined in accordance with U.S. EPA methodology:
• Carbon monoxide (EPA Method 10).
• Nitrogen oxides (EPA Method 7E).
• Total hydrocarbons (EPA Method 25A).
Stack samples were collected through a heated stainless steel probe and heated Teflon line
and sent to the portable CEM. The total hydrocarbon sample was drawn directly from this
heated line; refer to Section 3.2.6 for a discussion of sampling strategy. Heated sample line
pressure is monitored and the sampling rate is controlled by a needle valve on the pump
outlet in order to maintain excess conditioned sample flow. The excess sample is released
to the atmosphere to maintain a constant sample pressure.
The data from the CEM train was processed through a Molytek Model 2702 chart recorder.
This unit has the capacity to handle up to 32 channels of data from instruments,
thermocouples, and other process instrumentation. All active channels can be displayed on
a single strip chart. The Model 2702 al°^ T->les and converts the analog input signals to
5-7
-------
£
START
7.1.1
ENSURE SAMPLE
HOMOGENEITY. PERFORM
% SOLID DETERMINATION,
IF APPROPRIATE
7.1.2
WEIGH SAMPLE INTO
BOTTLE; ADD EXTRACTION
FLUID; EXTRACT 16 HOURS;
FILTER
7.2.1
PERFORM CLEANUP, IF
NECESSARY
7.2.2
CENTRIFUGE SAMPLE, IF
NECESSARY
7.3
DERIVATIZATION: MEASURE
ALIQUOT FOR LIQUID SAMPLE
OR LIQUID EXTRACT OF SOLID
SAMPLE; DILUTE TO TOTAL
VOLUME OF 100ml
EXTRACTION:
SOLID SORBENT OR
METHYLENE
CHLORIDE?
METHVLENE CHLORIDE
SOLID
SORBENT
7.3.4.1
ADD ACETATE BUFFER AND
ADJUST pH WITH ACETIC ACID
OR SODIUM HYDROXIDE; ADD
DNPH REAGENT; SEAL
CONTAINER; SHAKE 30 MINUTES
7.3.4.2
ASSEMBLE VACUUM MANIFOLD
AND CONNECT TO PUMP;
ASSEMBLE CARTRIDGES;
ATTACH SORBENT TRAIN TO
MANIFOLD; CONDITION
CARTRIDGE
7.3.4.3
REMOVE REACTION VESSELS
FROM SHAKER; ADD SODIUM
CHLORIDE SOLUTION
7.3.4.4
ADD THE REACTION SOLUTION
TO SORBENT TRAIN; ELUTE
UNDER VACUUM
7.3.4.6
ELUTE TRAIN WITH ETHANOL.
DILUTE TO VOLUME WITH
ETHANOL; MIX
7.3.6.1
ADD ACETATE BUFFER AND
ADJUST pH WITH ACETIC ACID
OR SODIUM HYDROXIDE; ADD
ONPH REAGENT; SEAL
CONTAINER; SHAKE 2 MINUTES
7.3.6.2
EXTRACT SOLUTION WITH 3.20-ml
PORTIONS OF METHYLENE
CHLORIDE; COMBINE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE LAYERS
7.3.6.3
ASSEMBLE A KUDERNA-DANISH
IK-DI REDUCE TO EXTRACT
CONCENTRATE LAYERS OF
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
7.3.6.4
ADD BOILING CHIPS TO
EVAPORATION FLASK AND
ATTACH A THREE-BAIL SNYDER
COLUMN TO THE K-D ASSEMBLY;
IMMERSE APPARATUS IN HOT
WATER .BATH; ADJUST
POSITIONING TO FINISH
CONCENTRATION IN 10-16 MIN.
7.3.6.6
EXCHANGE SOLVENT TO
METHANOL USING K-D ASSEMBLY
7.4
ESTABLISH LC OPERATING
PARAMETER
7.6.1.1.1
PREPARE CALIBRATION
STANDARDS
7.E.I.1.2
DERIVATIZE STANDARD
SOLUTIONS
7.6.1.2.1
ANALYZE STANDARDS AND
TABULATE PEAK AREA AGAINST
CONCENTRATION INJECTED
7.6.1.2.2
VERIFY WORKING CALIBRATION
CURVE DAILY WITH 1 OR MORE
STANDARDS
7.8.1
ANALYZE BY HPLC USING
SPECIFIED CONDITIONS; OTHER
CONDITIONS OR HARDWARE MAY
BE USED IF QC REQUIREMENTS
ARE MET
7.6.2
USE RETENTION TIMES TO
INTERPRET CHROMATOGRAMS
7.8.3
IF PEAK AREA EXCEEDS LINEAR
WORKING RANGE, USE A
SMALLER SAMPLE VOLUME OR
THE FINAL SOLUTION MAY BE
DILUTED WITH ETHANOL AND
REANALYZED
7.8.4
iF PEAK AREA MEASUREMENT IS
PREVENTED BY INTERFERENCES.
FURTHER CLEANUP IS NEEDED
7.7.1
CALCULATE RESPONSE
FACTORS FOR ANALYTES
7.7.2
CALCULATE CONCENTRATIONS
OF ALDEHYDES IN SAMPLE,
NOTING DILUTION FACTOR FOR
SAMPLES
STOP
FIGURE 5-5
ANALYTICAL SCHEME FOR ALDEHYDES/KETONES
-------
digital (ASCII) format, and transmits the data to a computer for data logging. The
WESTON data logging program reads the digital output from the Molytek 2702
approximately once per second. The speed varies depending upon the number of active
channels, microprocessor speed, and the baud rate for transmission. The data logger
calculates a 1-minute average from the instantaneous readings and stores this average on
a hard disk. The data logger displays the instantaneous channel values in real time, with
updates every 5 seconds. The 1-minute average and a - !ling 60-minute average values are
also displayed.
At the close of each test period, the CEM data was stored on the hard disk drive and
downloaded to a Lotus 1-2-3 spreadsheet to calculate discreet time periods and to correct
for calibration drift.
The analyzers used for this evaluation of the emissions were:
Parameter Manufacturer and Model Detection Method
CO Thermo Electron Model 48 NDIR
NOx Thermo Electron Model 10A Chemiluminescent Detector
THC J.U.M. Model VE-7 FID (heated)
The analyzers were calibrated at the start and end of each test day and/or test series.
Analyses of calibration gases from NIST traceable cylinders were performed along with zero
checks. Three-point calibrations (low, mid, and high range) were performed directly for
each analyzer. Bias checks were performed by introducing the calibration standard that is
closest to th& observed concentration in the sample gas at a three-way valve on the probe.
Bias checks performed at the intervals between each test repetition were averaged to correct
for instrument driftr The bias calibration gases are sent to the probe valve through a
separate Teflon line and back through the heated sample line and sample conditioning
system to the instrument to determine the entire sampling system calibration bias. Bias
calibration gas flow is regulated to maintain sample line pressure. All calibrations, zero -and
calibration drift tests, and QA procedures followed the specific requirements in the EPA
5-9
-------
reference methods. The calibration drift correction described in EPA Method 6C was used
for all analyzers.
5.4.3 Paniculate and Condensible Particulate
Particulate and condensible particulate emissions were withdrawn isokinetically from the
MDF cyclone outlet gas streams using an EPA Method 5/202 sampling train. A schematic
of the sampling train is shown in Figirrsi-6. This sampling train consisted of the following
components:
• A stainless steel or glass nozzle with an inside diameter sized to sample
isokinetically.
• A heated, (248 ± 25 °F) borosilicate-lined probe, approximately 5 ft long,
equipped with a calibrated thermocouple to measure flue gas temperature and
a calibrated S-type pitot tube to measure flue gas velocity pressure.
• A heated oven containing a section of borosilicate tubing followed by a
borosilicate filter holder with a preweighed 9-cm quartz fiber filter.
• Borosilicate tubing to connect the outlet of the filter holder to the first
impinger.
• An impinger train containing four impingers (No. 1 - 100 ml DI HjO; No. 2 -
100 ml DI HjO; No. 3 - dry; No. 4 - 300 gm silica gel).
• A vacuum hose with adapter to connect the outlet of the impinger train to a
control module.
• A control module containing a 3-cfm carbon vane vacuum pump (sample gas
mover), a calibrated dry gas meter (sample gas volume measurement device),
a calibrated orifice (sample gas flow rate monitor), and inclined manometers
(orifice and gas stream pressure indicators).
• A switchable calibrated digital pyrometer to monitor flue and sample gas
temperatures^
5-10
-------
THERMOMETER
THERMOCOUPLE
PROBE
TIP
REVERSE TYPE
PITOT TUBE
GLASS FILTER HOLDER
WITH TEFLON FILTER SUPPORT
CHECK
VALVE
PITOT
MANOMETER
ORIFICE
1 1
^=^
/• — ->_^\
^O^
1
(
\
s~~^
X '
\
)
\
BY
MAIN
VALVE
VACUUM LINE
DRY QAS
METER
ORIFICE
MANOMETER
FIGURE 5.6
EPA METHOD 5/202
PARTICULATE & CONDENSIBLE PARTICULATE SAMPLING TRAIN
-------
Preparation, testing, and sample recovery techniques, as shown in Figures 5-7, 5-8, and 5-9,
respectively, conformed to those specified in Section 4 of EPA Method 5 and section 3.2 of
EPA Method 202. Each test was 60 minutes in length and at least 30 dry standard cubic
feet of flue gas was sampled. All runs were isokinetic ± 10 percent.
Analytical procec, j ar," ^alcjlatic-., . -Jr particulate determination were performed at
specified in Sections 4 and 6 of Method 5, and Section 5 of Method 202. The analysis
procedure is described below:
• The filter and any loose fragments were desiccated for 24 hours and weighed
on a calibrated analytical balance to the nearest 0.1 mg to a constant weight.
"Constant weight" means a difference of no more than 0.5 mg or 1% of total
weight less tare weight, whichever is greater, between 2 consecutive weighings,
with no less than six hours of desiccation time between weighings.
• The front-half acetone wash samples and corresponding blank were
evaporated at ambient temperature and pressure in tared beakers, and then
desiccated to constant weight to the nearest 0.1 mg.
• The back-half methylene chloride rinse was evaporated at ambient
temperature and pressure in tared breakers and then desiccated to a constant
weight to the nearest 0.1 mg.
The material collected in the nozzle, probe, flask or connector, front-half of the filter holder,
and on the quartz fiber filter represents the EPA Method 5 particulate catch. Water vapor
and the condensible particulate were collected in the impinger portion. The total weight
measured in the back half wash fraction represents the EPA Method 202 condensible
particulate catch for each run. Acetone and methylene chloride blank corrections were
made on all wash sample weights.
A figure presenting the particulate analysis scheme is shown in Figure 5-10.
5.4.4 PM 10 and Condensible Particulate
PM10 and condensible particulate emissions from the MDF press stacks, microboard press
stacks, and core and surface EFB outlet gas streams were collected using an EPA Method
201 A/202 sampling train. The PM10 emissions at the MDF cyclone outlet were determined
5-12
-------
METHYLENE CHLORIDE WASH
OF SAMPLING NOZZLE.
PROBE. FILTER HOLDER
THOROUGHLY CLEAN
SAMPLING TRAIN COMPONENTS
IN LABORATORY
i
TRANSPORT
TO
TEST SITE
CHARGE
IMPINQER
TRAIN
MOD. IMPHGER NO. 1:
100 irt Hj 0
STD. IMPMGER NOS. 2 AND 3:
100 ml H2 O
IMPINQER NO. 4:
3OO g SILICA QEL
EXAMINE TARED FILTER
FOR FLAWS AND PLACE
INTO FILTER HOLDER
INLET AND OUTLET OF
SAMPLING NOZZLE,
PROBE
SEAL SAMPLING TRAIN
COMPONENTS WITH
8EPTUM8 AND/OR
GROUND GLASS PLUGS
OR CAPS TO PREVENT
CONTAMINATION
HLET TO IMPMGER NO. 1
AND OUTLET TO
IMPINQER NO. 4
TRANSPORT SAMPLING
TRAIN COMPONENTS TO
SAMPLING SITE
FIGURE 5-7
PREPARATION PROCEDURES FOR
PARTICULATE AND CONDENSIBLE PARTICULATE SAMPLING TRAIN
5-13
-------
ATTACH NOZZLE TO PROBE AND
mote TO CONNECTOR MANOMETERS.
PROBE AND OVEN HEATERS
34* + 39* F
TURN ON PROBE AND OVEN
HEATERS AND ADD
ICETOHBtWERTRAM
LEAK CHECK ASSEMBLED CAMHMO
THAN AT 1f He LEAK CHECK
HTOT L*C« PEN METHOD 2.
KCOMD LEAK RATE ON RELD
DATA CHEET; TRAM LEAK
MUSTK < 0.02
-------
1st, 2nd & 3rd
Probe liner Front h
and nozzle filler ho
Rinse
acet
Brust
and i
with a<
with Brush
one rinse
acet
liner
Inse
;etone
1
alf of Back r
using Filter filler he
and carefully remove
with and place
ana in petri dish
Brush
partic
onto
1
seal
di
\.
loose
ulate
niter
petri Rlns
;h with D
tall of impingers Last
)gslnq (PI water) , Implnoer
Measure Weigh
Implnger silica gel
contents for moisture
Empty contents
Into glass
container
1
;e 2x Rinse 2x
1 water with DI water
i
Rinse 2x Rinse 2x
with MeCI2 with MeCI2
1 1
1
FH PF IMP BH SQ
FIGURE 5-9. SAMPLE RECOVERY PROCEDURES FOR PARTICULATE/CONDENSIBLES TRAIN.
-------
SAMPLE TYPE 1 RLTER
SAMPLE TYPE 2
FRONT HALF METHYLENE
CHLONDE
DESICCATE TO CONSTANT WBQHT
SAMPLE TYPE 3
BACK HALF METHYLENE
CHLORIDE
DETERMINE TOTAL SAMPLE VOLUME
CUSTODY SEAL WASHINGS IN
LABELED BOROSUCATE BOTTLE.
COMPLETE CUSTODY FORM. SECURE
SAMPLE FOR SHFMENT
DETERMINE TOTAL SAMPLE VOLUME
TRANSFER CONTENTS TO TARED
BEAKER
TRANSFER CONTENTS TO TARED
BEAKER
EVAPORATE TO DRYNESS
EVAPORATE TO DRYNESS
DESICCATE TO CONSTANT WEIGHT
DESICCATE TO CONSTANT WEIGHT
FIGURE 5-10
ANALYSIS PROCEDURES FOR
PARTICULATE SAMPLES
5-16
-------
using a Method 20 1A sampling train. A minimum of 30 dscf was collected per run. A
sampling train schematic is shown in Figure 5-11. The sampling train consisted of the
following components:
• A PM10 stainless steel nozzle with an inside diameter sized to sample
isokinetically.
sizing cyclone designed to aerodynamically fractionate particulate at a
10 micron cut point.
• A heated stainless steel probe equipped with a calibrated thermocouple to
measure flue gas temperature and a calibrated S-type Pilot tube to measure
flue gas velocity pressure.
• A section of borosilicate tubing to connect the outlet of the sampling probe
to the first impinger.
j
• An impinger train consisting of four impingers. The first two impingers
contained 100 ml of HjO. The third impinger was dry and the fourth
contained 300 grams of dry preweighed silica gel.
• A vacuum hose with adapter to connect the outlet of the impinger train to a
control module.
• A control module containing a 3-cfrn carbon vane vacuum pump (sample gas
mover), a calibrated dry gas meter (sample gas volume measurement device),
a calibrated orifice (sample gas flow rate monitor), and inclined manometers
(orifice and gas stream pressure indicators).
• A switchable calibrated digital pyrometer to monitor flue and sample gas
temperatures.
The preparation, sampling, and recovery procedures that were used to determine PM10 at
all locations during the program are included in Figures 5-12, 5-13 and 5-14, respectively.
For the Method 202 procedure used in conjunction with Method 201A, refer to Section 5.4-
3. The PM10 analysis procedure is the- same as Method 5; refer to Figure 5-5 for a
schematic of the sampling analysis.
5.4.5 Semivolatiles
The semivolatile organic emissions at the core and surface EFB outlets and the MDF
cyclone outlet were determined using Method 0010. The sampling train as shown in
5-17
-------
THERMOMETER
FLEXIBLE LINE
THERMOCOUPLE
PM10 SIZING
DEVICE
NOZZLE
REVERSE TYPE
PITOT TUBE
CHECK
VALVE
ORIFICE
MANOMETER
FIGURE 5-11
EPA METHOD 201A
PM10 SAMPLING TRAIN
-------
ACETONE WASH
OF SAMPLING NOZZLE.
PROBE. FILTER HOLDER
THOROUGHLY CLEAN
TRAIN COMPONENTS
MLABORATORY
TRANSPORT,
TO
TEST SITE
CHARGE
IMPINOER
TRAIN
MOD. IMPINOER NO. 1:
100 ml H2 O
STD. IMPINOER NOS. 2 AND 3:
100 ml HZ O
IMPINGER NO. 4:
300 g SIUCA GEL
EXAMINE TARED FILTERS
FOR FLAWS AND PLACE
INTO FILTER HOLDERS
INLET AND OUTLET OF
SAMPLING NOZZLE.
PROBE
SEAL SAMPLING TRAIN
COMPONENTS WTTH
SEPTUM8 AND/OR
GROUND GLASS PLUGS
OR CAPS TO PREVENT
CONTAMINATION
INLET TO IMPINGER NO. 1
AND OUTLET TO
IMPINQER NO. 4
TRAIN COMPONENTS TO
SAMPLING SITE
FIGURE 5-12
PREPARATION PROCEDURES FOR
PM10 SAMPLING TRAIN
5-19
-------
ATTACH NOZZLE TO PROBE AND
PROBE TO CONNECTOR OR
CYCLONEAASK TO RLTER HOLDER.
ATTACH mPMMH TRAM TO
FLTER HOLDER WITH
ATE1
TRAM COMPONENT* AT
IWIC
ZERO MCUNEO MANOMETER*.
CONNECT UMBBJCAL TO
CONTROL MODULE AND TO
MWOBt NO. 4 OUTLET
TMW ON PROBE
HEATER*"'
BE TO MPWOtn
LEAK CHECK ASM
TRAM AT 1E- tig: LEAK CHECK
UME* PER METHOD 2.
RECORD LEAK RATE ON HELD
DATA SHEET: TRAM LEAK
MUST BE < 0.02 ofm
TEAM LEADER CHECK
wrmmocci
PDR*TART'nME
PROCESS OBSERVER CHECK
THAT PROCESS
• OPERATMO NORMALLY
PROBC POsmONED M
DUCT/STACK AT FMT
SAMPLMOPOMT
RECORD CtOCK TMC. RECORD MHIAL
DRY QAS METER. READ AP.T..TM
POR tSONNETR SAMPUNO
AH. SET AH AT I
METER. READREMAHMO
OAUOE8.
REMOVE CAMPLE PORT CAP.
MSERT PROBE THROUOH PORT.
SEAL PORT.
•TART TEST
ATDESIONATED
START TME
RECORD DATA ON HELD DATA
SHEET AT EACH POMT
CHECKMO
THROUOHOVT THE TEST
EACH POMT ON
TRAVERSE
•TOP SAMPIMQ AFTER COMPLETMO
> VOLUME. AND
UAKtiHECK,
RECORD PMAL DRY
OAS METER READMO
AND LEAK CHECK.
TRANSFER SAMPLHa TRAM
TO NEXT SAMPLE PORT.
LEAK CHECK. ANC REPEAT
TRAVERSE PROCEDURE.
AT COMPLETION OF TEST. LEAK
CHECK TRAM AND PITOT LUES AS
PREVIOUSLY MDKATED AND RECORD
VALUES. PUROETRAM. SEAL
OPENMOC AND TRANSPORT TO FEU)
LABORATORY FOR RECOVERY.
FIGURE 5-13
TEST PROCEDURES FOR
PM10 SAMPLING TRAIN
5-20
-------
FRONT HALF Of M>ACTOR
FLTER8
WASH AND BRUSH WITH ACETONE
A MINIMUM OF 3 TMES UNIX
CLEAN
CUSTODY SEAL FILTER IN LABELED
PETRI DISH. COMPLETE CUSTODY
FORM. SECURE SAMPLE FOR
SHPMENT
CUSTODY SEAL WASHINGS IN
LABELED BOROSIUCATE BOTTLE.
COMPLETE CUSTODY FORM. SECURE
SAMPLE FOR SHPMENT
FIGURE 5-14
SAMPLE RECOVERY PROCEDURES FOR
PM-10 SAMPLING TRAIN
5-21
-------
Figure 5-15 consisted of the following components:
• A stainless steel or glass nozzle with an inside diameter sized to sample
isokinetically.
• A heated (248 ± 25°F), 5-ft borosilicate-lined probe equipped with a
calibrated thermocouple to measure flue gas temperature and a calibrated
S-type pilot tube to measure the flue gas velocity pressure.
• A heated oven containing a borosilicate connector, cyc^sj€/flask and filter,
holder with a Soxhlet-extracted glass fiber filter.
• A borosilicate connector to join the outlet of the filter holder to the inlet of
the impinger train.
• An impinger train consisting of a Graham (spiral) type ice-water cooled
condenser, a temperature sensor (thermocouple), an ice-water jacketed
solvent module containing 40 grams of 30/60 mesh Amberlite™ XAD-2
(pre-extracted), a 1-liter condensate trap, one standard and one modified
Greenburg-Smith impinger each containing 100 ml high purity (HPLC) water,
an empty standard Greenburg-Smith impinger, and a final impinger containing
300 grams of dry preweighed silica gel plus a thermocouple to detect sample
gas exit temperature.
• A vacuum line (umbilical cord) with adapter to connect the outlet of the
impinger train to a control module.
• A control module containing a 3-cfm carbon vane vacuum pump (sample gas
mover), a calibrated dry gas meter (sample gas volume measurement device),
a calibrated orifice (sample gas flow rate monitor), and inclined manometers
(orifice and gas stream pressure indicators).
• A switchable calibrated digital pyrometer to monitor flue and sample gas
temperatures. -•-—.-*<• ,
— ^~' •K'*j*-i
The material collected in the nozzle, probe, connector or cyclone/flask, front-half filter
holder, and on the glass fiber filter were combined with the nnses/ extract ot the connectors,
condenser, and XAD sorbent for tv.^ ^-^ ' " semivolatiles. A minimum of 3
cubic meters of gas w^ ^^~, ^^ ^ r.~. - - -
The preparation, sampling and recovery procedures used for the semivolatile sampling tram
are included in Figures 5-16, 5-17, and 5-18 respectively. The sampling rate during each test
was isokinetic ± 10% and never exceeded the maximum rate of 0.75 cfm specified by the test
5-22
-------
HEATED AREA
HEATED
PROBE/
BOTTONHOOK
NOZZLE
REVERSE-TYPE
PITOT TUBE
TEMPERATURE
SENSOR
CHECK
VALVE
TEMPERATURE
*s SENSOR
BY PASS VALVE
^
ORIFICE
MANOMETER
DRY GAS METER
AIR-TIGHT PUMP
FIGURE 5-15
EPA METHOD 0010
SEMI VOLATILE ORGANIC HAPs SAMPLING TRAIN
-------
GLASSWARE: PROBE.
FILTER HOLDER. CONDENSATE
TRAP, CONNECTORS
GLASS FIBER FILTERS
REMOVE SURFACE RESIDUALS
AND SILICONS GREASES BY
SOAKING IN HOT CHROMIC ACID
CLEANING SOLUTION. RINSE
WITH TAP WATER, WASH IN SOAP
AND WATER, KUSC WITH
DISTILLED WATER, RINSE WITH
NANOCRADE METHYLENE
CHLORIDE
BOROSILICATE NOZZLE
GLASSWARE: XAD-2
neENT MODULES AND CAPS
WASH IN SOAP AND WATER, RINSE
WITH DISTILLED WATER. RINSE
WITH NANOGRADE ACETONE,
RINSE WITH NANOGHAOE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
SOXHLET EXTRACT WITH
TOLUENE FOR 10 HOURS.
V . DRY. SEAL WITH GLASS
CAPS OR WRAP ALL EXPOSED
ENDS WITH ALUMINUM FOIL
WASH « SOAP AND WATER. RINSE
WITH DISTILLED WATER. RINSE
WITH NANOGRADE ACETONE,
RINSE WITH NANOGRADE
METHVLENE CHLORIDE MUFFLE
AT 468 C FOR 4 HOURS
Ul
fe
TRANSPORT TO JOB SITE
RETAIN SAMPLES OF
DISTILLED WATER FOR BLANK
DETERMINATIONS
CLEAN IN SOXHLET WITH
DISTILLED WATER 2X.
PESTICIDE GRADE METHANOL.
AND NANOGRADE METHYLENE
CHLORIDE 2X FOR 24 HOURS
PACK MODULES WITH XAD-2. PUT
END CAPS ON CONTAINER AND
COVER WITH ALUMINUM FOIL
CHARGE MPINGER TRAIN
COMPLETE ASSEMBLY OF TRAIN
SEAL OPEN ENDS OF
IMPINOERS AND NOZZLE WITH
GLASS PLUGS AND ALUMINUM
FOIL. RESPECTIVELY
CONDENSATE TRAP EMPTY.
MPINGER NO. 1 AND NO. 2 WITH
100 Irt EACH OF DISTILLED WATER;
MPINGER NO. 3 DRY, MPINGER
NO. 4 300 GRAMS DRY SILICA GEL
RINSE CONDENSATE TRAP AND
FIRST TWO IMPINGERS WITH
DISTILLED WATER
TRANSPORT TO TEST POINT
FIGURE 5-16
PREPARATION PROCEDURES FOR
SEMIVOLATILE HAPs SAMPLING-TRAIN
-------
ATTACH NOZZLE TO PROBE
AND PROBE TO PITER HOLDER.
ATTACH HOTNUCR TRAM TO FLTER
HOLDER WITH BOROSUCATE TUBMQ.
(ATTACH XAD TUBE TO
BEMVOLATU TRAM)
•AMPLMaSITE
AT
CONNECT UMMJCAL TO
CONTROL MODULE AND TO
I NO. 4 OUTLET
LEAK CHECK ASSEMBLED SAMPLMa
TRAM AT 1C He. If
PROBE AND OVEN
HEATERS 260 *F
RECORD LEAK MATE
ON HELD DATA (HOT:
i < - 0.02 cftn
TURN ON PROBE AND OVEN
HEATER* AND ADO ICE TO
MPMOER TRAM. START
CONDENIER / XAD COOLANT WATER.
TEAM LEADER CHECK
WITH PIWCEM OHERVER
FOR START TIVK
ntOCES* OBSERVER CHECK
THAT PROCESS
M OPERATMO NORMALLY
POStnONEDM
STACK AT HRST
SAMPUMKMT
RECORD CLOCK TME. MITIAL
DRY OAS METER. £f. T , AND. T
VALUES. FOR (SOKMETIC SAMFLMO
£H. SET AHATORRCE
METER. READREMAMHO
OAUOES.
REMOVE SAMPLE PORT CAP.
NSBTT PROBE THROUGH PORT.
SEAL PORT.
START TEST
AT DESMNATED
START TMC
RECORD DATA ON HELD
DATA SHEET AT EACH
POMT
THROUGHOUT THE TEST
EACH POMT ON
TRAVERSE
.tRCOMPLETMO
TRAVERSE AND REMOVE PROBE
RECORD FINAL DRY
OAS METER READING
AND LEAK CHECK
TRANSFER SAMPLMO TRAM
TO NEXT SAMPLE PORT
ANDI
AT COMPLETION OF TEST. LEAK
CHECK TRAM AND PITOT / LMEC AS
PREVIOUSLY KCHCATED AND
RECORD VALUE. SEAL OPEN W OS
AND TRANSPORT TO FEID
LABORATORY FOR RECOVERY.
FIGURE 5-17
SAMPLING PROCEDURES FOR
SEMIVOLAT1LE HAPS
5-25
-------
NOZZLE, PROBE, AND
FRONT-HALF FILTER
HOLDER
FILTER
CONNECTORS
AND
CONDENSER
XAD-2 MODULE
WASKf WHILE BRUSHING
WITH NANOGRADE
METHANOL / METHYLENE CHLORIDE
SEAL IN LABELED GLASS BOTTLE OR
PETRI DISH. COMPLETE CUSTODY
FORM, SECURE SAMPLE.
WASH WITH NANOGRADE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE/METHANOL
REMOVE FROM
IMPINGER TRAIN
SEAL WASHINGS IN LABELED
BOROSILICATE BOTTLE. MARK (
LIQUID LEVEL. COMPLETE CUSTOD\
FORM. SECURE SAMPL,N
TRANSFER WASHINGS TO
BOROSILICATE BOTTLE; LABEL. SEAL
AND MARK LIQUID LEVEL, COMPLETE
CUSTODY FORM*. SECURE SAMPLE.
SEAL ENDS WITH GLASS
CAPS, COVER WITH FOIL, LABEL.
COMPLETE CUSTODY FORM.
SECURE SAMPLE.
tn
k
ON
i u'NDEKf,ATE TRAP
IMPINQER NO. 1, 2, AND 3
MEASURE VOLUME OF LIQUID
AND RECORD.
MEASURE VOLUME OF LIQUID
AND RECORD.
TRANSFER SOLUTION TO
LABELED. BOROSILICATE BOTTLE.
TRANSFER SOLUTION TO
LABELED BOROSILICATE BOTTLE.
WASH WITH DISTILLED WATER
AND METHYLENE CHLORIDE/
METHANOLV
WASH WITH DISTILLED WATER
AND METHYLENE CHLORIDE/
METHANOL'.
ADD WASHINGS TO BOTTLE AND
SEAL. MARK LIQUID LEVEL.
COMPLETE CUSTODY FORM.
SECURE SAMPLE.
ADD WASHINGS TO BOTTLE AND
SEAL. MARK LIQUID LEVEL.
COMPLETE CUSTODY FORM,
SECURE SAMPLE.
IMPINQER NO. 4
(SILICA GEL)
WEIGH AND RECORD
CONDENSATE AND SOLVENT RINSE SAMPLES FOR BACK
HALF OF TRAIN WILL BE MAINTAINED SEPARATELY.
FIGURE 5-18
SAMPLE RECOVERY PROCEDURES FOR
SEMIVOLATILE HAPS
w » 3 7rap t\ dra Mr Ing* Vraoov «Y\ mO010rma. w *y
-------
method. A blank train was set up, leak checked, and sealed for the duration of one of the
tests performed at the EFB outlet and the MDF cyclone outlet. The purpose of this train
blank was to determine whether contamination occurred during preparation, setup, recovery,
or analysis steps. These and other QC checks are discussed in further detail in Section 6.
The analysis procedure for the semivolatile organics is sun^orized below. See EPA
Methods 8270 for detailed specification of the analysis procedures.
Concentrate each front-half wash sample to 1-5 ml using a rotary evaporator
apparatus. Rinse sample container three times with methylene chloride, add
to concentrated solution, and concentrate further to near dryness.
Add above concentrate to the filter and XAD-2 resin in a soxhlet apparatus
that contains a precleaned glass extraction thimble and silica gel. Add
semivolatile internal standard. Cover with a plug of precleaned glass wool.
Reflux sample with toluene or methylene chloride for 16 hours. Transfer
extract using three 10 ml rinses of toluene to a rotary evaporator and
concentrate to approximately 8 ml. Reduce to 1 ml under nitrogen stream.
Split sample in half. One split is analyzed, and the second is stored.
The back-half impinger solvent rinse is concentrated to 2 ml using a rotary
evaporator, then added to the impinger water/condensate sample. Following
solvent addition the sample is spiked with the appropriate semivolatile
internal standards. A liquid extraction is conducted usingjnethylene chloride.
The extract is combined with the front-half extract for cleanup and analysis.
The remaining extract is analyzed for the semivolatile compounds utilizing
EPA Method 8270 procedures for high-resolution GC with low-resolution
mass spectrometry.
The analytical scheme for the EPA 8270 procedures is shown in Figure 5-19.
5-27
-------
XAO PRESPKED WtTH
4ngD/F8S100ug
TERPHENYL-O14
ROTOVAP TO 2 rrt
HLTER
MPINOER WATER
ADDTOSOXLET
ADD TO SOX FOR
EXTRACTION
ADDTO80XLET
SPHCE WITH 4mO/f
BOflQANICSSS
SPKES-I, HI AND V
SOXHLJETM
! '
BH IUUOH IMUQ,RINSES
ROTOVAP TO 2 irt
AS 4 no ORQANKS SS
SPfCESHII AND V
30XHLETW
ADD TO IMPINQER
WATER
UQ-UQ
EOWMiCI,
EXTRACT TO ARCHIVE
COMBINE
OnOANICS M tPtXrt
DG-fHENOL
1,4-OBflOMOBENZENE-04
CROMNCC M CPtCE-l
D6-firTROB£NZ£NE
2-RUOROBIPHENYL
1,3,6-TRICHLOROBENZENE-O3
OMMNICS U (TKE-B
2.4,9-TTUBHOMOPHENOL
onoAMcc cc smx-iv
ANTHRACENE-D10
OMAMCC cc cncE-v
PYRENE-010
100uo
100 ug
100 ug
100 ug
lOOuo
100 ug
EXTRACT TO OROANICS
ANALYZE FOR
SEMIVOL COMP DS 8270
TARQET LIST PLUS 1O TICS
FIGURE 5-19
SEMIVOLATILE HAPs ANALYSIS SCHEME
5-28
-------
5.4.6 Volatile Organics
The volatile organic emissions for the core EFB and surface EFB outlets and the MDF
cyclone outlet were determined by Method 0030. A schematic of the sampling train is
shown in Figure 5-20. This sampling train consisted of the following components connected
in series:
„. • A heated glass probe, 5 ft in length, containing a glass wool particulate filter.
• The probe is connected to an ice water-cooled condenser followed by a
temperature sensor, an adsorption cartridge containing 1.6 grams of
Tenax-GC, and a condensate trap.
• A section of Teflon tubing is used to connect the outlet of the condensate trap
to a second condenser which is followed by a back-up sorbent trap containing
1 gram of Tenax-GC and 1 grant of activated charcoal, a second condensate
collector, and a tube containing an unweighed amount of dry silica gel.
• The tube of silica gel is connected, via an umbilical cable, to a control console
containing flow controllers, a calibrated 1-liter-per-minute dry gas meter, a
sample pump, a temperature indicator, and other components.
The preparation, sampling, recovery, and analytical procedures that were used to determine
the volatile organics are included in Figures 5-21, 5-22, 5-23, and 5-24. The volatile
organics were determined by analyzing three of the pairs of traps per test run by EPA
Method 5040 purge-trap-desorb GC/MS. EPA Method 8240 was used to analyze for
volatiles in the condensate samples.
Each sorbent tube sample that was analyzed was spiked with internal standards, then
thermally desorbed in a tube oven onto the Tenax analytical adsorbent trap. This
procedure is described in Section 7 of the reference method. Each sample was then
desorbed from the analytical adsorbent trap into the GC/MS system per EPA Method 5040.
Analysis of the condensate samples was conducted as specified in EPA Method 624, P-T-D
GC/MS. Laboratory results are reported as total micrograms of each volatile organic in the
samples.
5-29
-------
GLASS WOOL
PARTICULATE FILTER
r/1
Ul
i»
o
HEATED PROBE
STACK WALL
CONDENSATE
TRAP IMPINQER
ORIFICE
MANOMETER
FIGURE 5-20
EPA METHOD 0030
VOLATILE ORGANIC SAMPLING TRAIN (VOST)
-------
OLAaSWAKAie
TEfUMTUBBU
1
IMK WITH NAMMMADE
pEtncne QIUOC HEXMC
TBUXOC
1
Acrt/ATH) CHARCOAL
i
BCIIMCr N BDXMCT FOH
IB Noun mm ICTHAMX
FMATBOff CFOM
1 HOW
C.SCAL0Oa
WItM OL*a«, TBUM. CM
VIS. CATS
120 COVW
PAOC lOaBfT TUBES
..." WITH CHAHOOAL
PACK aOBBIT TUBE! WITH
TBUXOC
UOMMSMTD
TUBETTFEl
1J>CMAMMTD
TUBCTYrE2
• •"'•'-< DHVtM TUBE WITH
2O OHAMB OF BUCA OB.
1 OHAM NTH BACK-UP SECTION
OCMMnOH AT Z70 % WITH
FU(WB> HQJUM RJOW Of
ID
-------
ATTACH M OBOE PROBE
CCNOeaeR. TUBE TYPE 1.
CONDEMWTETRAP.TEfUMTUBMO,
OBCONO OMoetaai. TUK Tvrc 2.
aectMD CONDBMATETRAP, TUBMO,
AMXUCAQB.TUK
AflOOMU OAMU« THAN
COtrOMNTBATTEBTPOMT
1
LEAK CHECK AflOBtBLfB
SAMUtO TMM AT IE M. HO
CONNECT UkBUCAL TO OUTLET O
GRJCA GEL TUBE AND TO
CONTROL CONSOLE
RECORD LEAK CHECK OH FBJJ
DATABMXT
PROBE HEATER AT 21 ^
TVimONPKM
CHCATEHAM)
COOLANT njfcr
,
J
TEAM l£ADER CHECK WITH
nOCOH OMCW/Eft FOB
(TARTTME
pnocEas oesEFVtn
aeuRE) THAT niccess B
oreuTNO NOIMAU.Y
PONT H STACK
nexno cuxx TWE. nexxo
MTUL DHY CUfl tCTER KAMM
AM] COWONENT TEkTBlATUICB,
SET GAftTLNO NATE ON MlTAhCIBI
AMD ICAD KEMAMMO OAUOEB
REMOVE B***l£ POWT AND PHOBE
CAPS, fuarr pnou THUDUOH
POUT. SEAL POXT
ITAItT TBT AT DEanNATH>
RECOfD DATA ON REID DATA SHEET
EVERY G M4UTES
PHCCESS oeaeivBi TAKE DATA
THROUOHOUT TBT
•NOU POMT. CXM0TANT HATE
AT LITBIlMM RM
WUT OFF TRAM, ICCC4D
VOUJfcE READMO. HEUOVE
PROBE RUM BTACK, LEAJC
CHECK TRAM AND RECORD
IfAKRATE
CHANGE TRAP PAM EVERY
20 MNUTEB THROUGHOUT THE
2-HOUR TEST. SEAL EMM
WITH TBUM OR «TAI
RECORD FMAL DRY OAS VETEK
READNQ AND LEAK CHECK AT
BW OF 2-HOUR TEST
FIGURE 5-22
SAMPLING PROCEDURES FOR
VOLATILE ORGANICS
5-32
-------
PROBE AND CONDENSER
SORBENT TUBES
COMPENSATE TRAPS
SUCAGEL
WASH VHTH DBTILED WATER
>£MOVE FROM TRAM
DISCARD LIQUID
3EAL ENDS WITH TEFLON
CAPPED TRANSPORT TUBES
OR STAINLESS STEEL CAPS
AND INSERT IN TEFLON
PLACE M LABELED AMBER
JAR CONTAINING ACTIVATED
CHARCOAL. SEAL JAR WITH
TEFLON LINED UD, STORE AT
WETR ICE TEMPERATURES c).
COMPLETER CUSTODY FORM.
SCEURE SAMPLES FOR SHFMENT
MEASURE VOLUME OF LIQUID
AMD RECORD
WET" """ORD VOLUME,
^cNERATION
HEQURED *
PLACE LIQUID IN 4O-ml VOA
VIAL. TOP WITH WATER.
SEPTUM SEAL
RGURE 5-23
RECOVERY PROCEDURES FOR
VOLATILE ORGANICS
5-33
-------
T«
Til
Tub*
of ISS-1 (100
025 g
I
of ISS-1 (10 0
0.28 g
Row 11 mln.
btfwt to HROC/UWS
I
of ISS-1 (10 I)
60 g/l
Haw 11 irtn.
NwttoHRQCAJUWS
I
Flow 11 mln.
Infact to HRQC/LRMS
Anatyzcttx-
824O + CAA;
10 TIC*
824O + CAA;
10 TIC*
I
Aiwlyz«far
824O -I- CAA:
10 TIC*
ISS-1 Cone. 25 icrograms/ml each
Internal Standard /Surrogate Solution
Bromochloromethane ISTD
1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 SURR
1,4-Difluorobenzene ISTD
Chlorobenzene-d5 ISTD
Toluene-d8 SURR
Benzene-d6 SURR
Xylene-dIO SURR
RGURE 5-24
ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES FOR
VOLATILE ORGANICS
5-34
-------
SECTION 6
QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL ACTIVITIES
6.1 PRESENTATION
This section summarizes the quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) activities that
tvcre implemented to assure WESTON successfully met the goals and objectives of this
assignment. These' procedures were an integral part of the testing program activities.
Section 6.2 addresses the data quality objectives. Section 6.3 covers method-specific QC
results for the flue gas sampling. Laboratory QC checks are discussed in Section 6.4. QC
checks for data reporting are covered in Section 6.5, and audits and corrective actions are
discussed in the subsections 6.6 and 6.7. The appendices present all necessary backup data.
62 DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES
The overall objective of the sampling and analysis effort was to provide data that are
precise, accurate, comparable, representative and complete for characterizing the sources
to be evaluated under this assignment. The data quality objectives for this testing program
were deemed complete if all planned data are obtained within the QA/QC criteria noted
in the Test Plan and established by the applicable methods.
Data quality objectives are measured in terms of precision, accuracy and completeness. The
WESTON QA objective of having 95% of the laboratory data usable without qualification
was achieved. The overall QA objective of obtaining at least 80% usable data without
qualification was obtained.
The comparability of the data is a qualitative, not quantitative, review of the measurement
data. This QA objective determines the confidence with which data sets can be compared.
The comparability has been ensured by WESTON's use of standardized test methods, QA
plans, sample container preparation, sample handling procedures, analytical procedures,
6-1
-------
calculation procedures,, and report preparation. In addition, these activities were performed
by properly trained, experienced personnel. The data from this survey can be compared to
those obtained from other planned or previous programs that meet the data quality
objectives.
6.3 PC FOR SAMPLE COLLECTION
***The following subsections provide a list of method-specific QC proce^^s employed during
the field sampling effort. The procedures specified for the particulate/condensibles will also
apply to the other isokinetic sample trains (PM10, aldehyde/ketone, MM5). General QC
checks that applied to all methods include the following:
• leak checks;
• use of standardized forms, labels and checklists;
• maintenance of sample traceability;
• collection of appropriate blanks;
• use of calibrated instrumentation;
• use of Protocol 1 and/or NIST traceable calibration gases;
- tfS£"-
• review of data sheets in the field to verify completeness; and
• use of validated spreadsheets for calculating results.
While each team member shares in the responsibility to follow the stated Test Plan, the
Field Manager was ultimately responsible for assuring each of these QC checks were fully
and properly implemented.
6.3.1 Method 0011 Aldehvde/Ketones
QC procedures used to determine the accuracy of M0011 sampling runs are outlined in
Draft SW-846 Method 0011. Sampling for Aldehyde andKetone Emissions from Stationary
Sources, Sections 3.5.11 and 3.5.12. These checks include:
6-2
-------
• Use of reagents that meets method criteria. A supply of the DNPH reagent was
prepared within 5 days of scheduled use. Two aliquots from each lot of DNPH were
reserved for blank analysis as per Method 0011A.
• Collection of two field spike samples.
• Collection of three field blanks.
To further assure valid, reprc:^itat;-"e sample collection for this system, the impingers were
analyzed separately. The laboratory reports included in Appendix B-17 discusses the
effectiveness of the collection efficiency. In general, the sample strategy used was effective
hi the capture of aldehyde/ketone emissions. Refer to Section 3.2.1 of this report for a
discussion of the results.
The preparation and recovery of the EPA Method 0011 test train was performed in an area
isolated from the preparation and recovery activities for the other test trains. This was to
minimize the potential for contamination of the Method 0011 samples from acetone. Blank
trains (identical to the EPA Method 0011 sample train) were charged, leak checked, and
recovered. A blank train was setup for the MDF press stack,, the microboard press stacks
and the core EFB and surface EFB outlets. The blank trains were analyzed as a QC check
to determine whether or not contamination occurred during preparation, setup, recovery or
analysis. Variability in the acetone and acetaldehycief results (discussed in Section 3.2.1)
introduced a degree of uncertainty. As such, these values should only be used for general
estimates.
6.32 Continuous Emissions Monitoring
The QC procedures were performed on-site according to EPA Methods 10, IE, and 25A for
carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, and total hydrocarbon emissions, respectively.
Additionally, the analyzers used were calibrated prior to leaving the home office and upon
return from the job.
6-3
-------
Specific QC checks include:
• Use of protocol 1 gases (verify ± 10% of known concentration)
• Performance of zero and calibration drift tests (± 10% of span)
• Performance of system bias check (± 5% of span).
6.3.3 Methods 5/202 Particulate/Condensibles
EPA Methf^ 5 se"'ed as the QC guiifeline for precise sampling criteria. Special attention
was given to the following quality control (QC) checks:
• Prior to and following each run and port change, the sampling train was leak
checked. All trains met the required method criteria for leak checks.
• The outlet of the silica gel impinger was maintained at less than 68° F during
sampling.
• Isokinetic sampling was maintained at 100 percent ± 10 percent and readings were
recorded at 5-minute or less intervals.
• Use of organic rinsed glassware and sample containers.
6.3.4 Method 201A PM10
Quality control procedures outlined for EPA Method 5 sampling were followed for this
system. A pretest leak check was perrofmed through the entire system. Mid-point and post-
test leak checks were not conducted through the PMj0 cyclone to avoid disturbing the
fractionated particulate collected hi the PM10 sizing device. A leak check was done through
the impL^, , j,^- the completion of the test run. The runs performed at the MDF and
Microboard press stack were approximately four hours in duration. This was done to
maximize that the sample catch in order to insure proper gravimetric analysis.
6.3.5 Method 0010 Semivolatiles
QC guidelines for Modified Method 5 were followed as stated in SW-846 Method 0010,
"Modified Method 5 Sampling Train" Section 11. Additional quality control considerations
are outlined in Method 8270. Sampling criteria are given in EPA Method 5. QC measures
6-4
-------
employed for this procedure include:
• Use of organic rinsed glassware and sample containers.
• Collection of field bias blanks.
• Use of teflon tape instead of silicone grease.
^f
• Collection of field bias b1""1"
62.6 Methods 1-4 Velocity/Volumetric Flow Rate QC Procedure
The QC procedures^)! velocity/volumetric flow rate determinations followed guidelines set
forth by EPA Method 2. Incorporated into this method are sample point determinations
by EPA Method 1, flue gas oxygen (O2) and carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration
determinations by EPA Method 3, and gas moisture determination by EPA Method 4.
Volumetric flow rates were determined using measurement methods and procedures
outlined in Reference Method 2. Checks were performed at all sample locations to verify
the presence or absence of cyclonic flow. Oxygen (O2) and carbon dioxide (CO2)
concentrations at the cyclone outlet and the press stacks were determined using Fyrite
analyzers. This was deemed acceptable since none of the sources were considered
combustion sources and none of the reported emissions data was corrected for dilution
effects. The oxygen and carbon dioxide concentrations at the core and surface sampling
locations were determined using orsat analyzers.
6.3.7 Method 0030 VOST
"* -eaff
The major QC item associated with the VOST sampling was the completion of the VOST
audit. This is a useful check for deterrninirj . JGL f'scision and accuracy for both the
field and laboratory components. Other QC measures included maintaining VOST tubes
samples at or below 4°Cr collection of condensate samples in VOA vials, and special
precleaning of all glassware and containers. A field bias blank was collected at the surface
EFB outlet. Measured total hydrocarbon concentrations were used as a guideline to select
the desired VOST sample volume in an effort to minimize trap saturation.
6-5
-------
6.4 PC PROCEDURES FOR ANALYSES
The following subsections outline the basic quality control components associated with the
analytical procedures to be utilized. Several different types of samples were analyzed as
part of the ongoing quality control program for this assignment. Blank samples were
analyzed in order to assess possible contamination from the field and/or laboratory, so that
corr^dve measures of future programs can be taken if necessary. The types of QC samples
analyzed ^ring : assignment include:
Field Blanks - These blank samples were exposed tiT^'M and sa~~7**ng conditions,
and analyzed in order to assess possible contamination from the field (one for each
lot of samples analyzed).
Reagent and Solvent Blanks - These blanks were prepared in the laboratory and
analyzed in order to determine the background of each of the reagents (or solvent
in the case of paniculate samples) used in each type of analysis (one for each new
lot number of solvent used).
Duplicates - multiple analysis of specific samples were 'completed by the analyst to
check on the validity of certain analogous samples.
Matrix Spike - A known quantity of standard was added to the sample during
preparation stage. The amount detected after analysis was reported as a percent
recovery and used to assess accuracy in consideration of possible matrix interference.
On a selected number of samples, a matrix spike duplicate was prepared to assess
precision and accuracy.
Calibration Standards - A calibration standard was analyzed as required by the
applicable method.
6.4.1 Methods 5/2(T ^rtirHate/JCondensibles
. -.. ^"k**.
EPA Method 5 served as the QC guideline for precise sampling criteria. Special attention
was given to the following quality control (QC) checks:
• All samples were desiccated a minimum of 24 hours prior to the first weighing.
Constant weigh is achieved when consecutive reading agree within 0.5 mg. These
reading must be at least 6 hours apart.
6-6
-------
• Gravimetric measurements were checked with a set of Class S weights.
Measurements were made in the approximate range of the actual field samples.
6.42 Method 201A PM10
Quality control procedures outlined for EPA Method 5 analyses were followed for Method
201A $^-^~- _ ihe reported results were at or very near th~ minimum detection lir'tsfor
the gravimetric analysis. This aspect of the PMj0 data must be consider- ' ' gviewing any
of the reported results.
6.4.3 Method 0011A Aldehyde/Ketones Analysis ^
The analyte calibration linearity curves all had r2 values exceeding 0.999. Four continuing
calibration checks were required for this study. None of the compounds deviated from the
initial calibration by more than 15% except n-butyraldehyde which exceeded the initial
calibration by 20 to 40 %. This high value results from a confluence with a peak in the
MEK standard.
Two matrix spike/matrix spike duplicates were performed for formaldehyde, acetone and
methyl ethyl ketone. The results are summarized on Table 6-1. Results for the field" bias
blank are provided on Table 6-2.
High-performance liquid chromatographs were calibrated prior to each day of use.
Calibration standard mixtures were prepared from appropriate reference materials and
contained analytes appropriate for the method of analysis.
6.4.4 Method 0010 Semivolatiles
Stack samples collected using Method 0010 were analyzed in accordance with the guidelines
of Method 8270. The samples were analyzed as a combined front half (methanol/methylene
chloride probe rinse and filter), back half (XAD and back half rinse) and impinger
(aqueous) sample extract. Quality control measures included: pre-spiking the XAD resin
-------
TABLE 6-1
M001 la Matrix Spike Duplicates- Percent Recovery
Analyte
Formaldehyde
MgfhylEthylKetone
Benzaldehyde
MSI
99.1
54.1
101.0
MSD1
91.6
JO -aw.
97.2 -
MS2
89.6
59.8
o<
MSD2
91.4
71.1 ~
'96.4
6-2
M001 la Field Bias Blank and Reported MDLs
Compound
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acrolein
Acetone
Propionaldehyde
Crotonaldehyde
n-Butyraldehyde
Methylethylketone
Benzaldehyde
!o^vijgrai/-f»*ivde
Valeraldehyde
o-Tolualdehyde
m/p-Tolualdehyde
Hexaldehyde
2,5-Dimethylbanzaldehyde
Method
DetectionLimit
Mi/mL
0.0079
0.0046
0.0131
0.0052
0.0075
0.0295
0.0386
0.0225
0.0062
0.0197
0.0330
0.0092
0.0052
0.0317
0.0046
FieldBias Blank, m
MDF Press
399
19
20
20"
<1*
23
32
<4*
8
23
36
12
12
43
20
Surface
EFB Outlet
36
16
15
62
<2*
30
42
<5*
12
29
67
<2*
8
19
4
Microboard
Press
• 30
9
10
22 -
1*
16
25
<4**
<1*
•• , -_a -"-*•„ . .*,„
~<1.1-ss'-
17
<1*
<5**'
11
<1*
analyte not detected ** analyte present but less than detection limit
6-8
-------
with surrogate compounds, initial calibrations, continuing (daily) calibrations, field and
laboratory blanks and the analysis of two XAD traps pre-spiked with a- and 6- pinenes. The
MM5 analyses were completed in two separate batches. The MDF cyclone outlet and pre-
spiked XAD traps were analyzed as part of one batch. The second batch included samples
from the microboard surface and core layer outlet locations. Both batches included analysis
of field and la^iittory blanks.
The calibration solutions are prepared with mixtures of analytes in solutions ranging from
20 to 160 mg/ml with the internal standards injected at a concentration of 40 mg/ml.
Individual response factors (RF) are determined at concentrations of 20, 50, 80,120 and 160
mg/ml and are used to calculate an average RF. If the relative standard deviation (RSD)
of the five RFs is less than 30%, the calibration is considered acceptable. The RFs for all
target analytes were within the 30% limit except 2,4-dinitrophenol and 4,6-dinitro-2-
methylphenol. These analytes were not detected in any of the samples and therefore had
no effect on the quality of the data. The continuing (daily) calibrations also met method
criteria acceptance limits for all compounds except benzidine and 3,5-dichlorophenol. Once
again, these analytes were not present in the samples and therefore are considered to have
no effect on the data quality.
All XAD traps were pre-spiked with 100 //g terphenyl-d14 prior to field use. Prior to
extraction, all samples were fortified with 100 /*g each of eight additional surrogate spike
compounds. All recoveries of the surrogate compounds were within the method criteria of
50 to 150% for the MDFCO and all blanks. Sample. 13m the MBCLO and MBSLo
required dilution to quantify the pinene compounds. Therefore, the surrogate compounds
from these samples were diluted out of the detectable range. However, recoveries for the
analyses of the blanks which were extracted at the same time were within acceptable limits.
Three of the surrogate compounds were below the method advisory guidelines of 50% for
both of the spike samples.
6-9
-------
Several compounds were detected in the field samples that were also detected in the field
and laboratory blanks. Amounts of these compounds that were found in the samples that
were not greater than five times the amount found in the laboratory blank should not be
considered native to that source.
•^"wo XAD traps were pre-spiked with 100 fig each of a- and fi-pinene. The recoveries for
these spikes rang::! from approximately 35 to 45%. These values indicat*:1 a moderate
recovery efficiency. The volatility of these compounds may have resulted in some loss
during the nitrogen concentration procedure.
6.4.5 Method 0030 VOST
The VOST analysis is based on the guidelines of Method 5040 and 8240. Quality control
measures included performance of initial calibrations (using internal standards, analytes of
interest and surrogate standards), continuing calibrations (daily), analysis of blanks and
analysis of audit samples.
The range of calibration for low level VOST analysis extends from 0.10 to 1.0 //g. The
analytes for the calibration standard are prepared at amounts of 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75 and 1.0
fig. Internal standards are injected at a constant amount of 0.25 fig. For the high level
VOST analysis, the calibrations are performed with standards that range from 10 to 100 /ig
with 12.5 fig of internal standard added to the VOST tube. Although the QC criteria for
high level analyses have not been established, correlation of the guidelines and criteria of
Method 8240 have been generally very 0 «d. Five individual response fa^^o «^v-aferaged
to calculate a mean RF. If the relative standard deviation (RSD) of these RFs is less than
50%, the calibration is considered acceptabler The calibration check compounds (CCC)
must have a percent difference (%D) of less than 30%.
The initial calibrations had a % RSD for the response factors ranging from 1 to 31% (below
50% is acceptable). The RF %D values from the continuing calibrations were generally
below 30% with acrylonitrile and certain ketone compounds occasionally outside the desired
-------
range. Each reported recovery for the surrogate compounds were within the suggested
method criteria of 50 to 100% with the exception of one of the audit samples (possibly due
to a large tetrachloroethene peak) and the tenax tube from MBSLO 1A (artificially inflated
due to low internal standard recovery).
Analysis of field blanks and laboratory blanks reveaictftow levels of the compounds of
interest. There were reported contamination of the tubes for several coi_. Bands'Deluding
methylene chloride and carbon disulfide. Table 6-3 summarizes the compounds and levels
reported in all VOST tube blanks.
Results of the analysis of the VOST tubes collected from the two EPA audit cylinders are
reported'in Table 6-4.
The VOST sampling and analyses were performed with some required variation from
standard protocol. These variations were attributed to the high concentrations of a and 8
pinene. The majority of the pinene data is considered estimated due to exceeding
calibration range of the use of the non-standard high level analysis procedure.
--s
6.4.6 Method 7E Nitrogen Oxides. Method 10 Carbon Monoxide and
Method 25A Total Hydrocarbons Monitoring
All analyses for these parameters were completed on-site during the field effort. The field
bias check and calibration on run MDFP3-M25A-2 was not within the Method requirements.
An additional run was performed to replace this run. All analyses for this parameter were
completed on-site during the field effort. All bias checks and system calibrations were
within Method requirements.
6.5 OA/OC CHECKS FOR DATA REDUCTION. VALIDATION. AND REPORTING
Data quality audits were conducted using data quality indicators which require the detailed
review of: (1) the recording and transfer of raw data; (2) data calculations; (3) the
documentation of procedures; and (4) the selection of appropriate data quality indicators.
6-11
-------
TABLE 6-3
Field Laboratory Blank VOSTTube Results Expressed in Micrograms (ug)
Compound
Carbon Disulfide
Chloroform
Cumene (isopropylbenzene)
n-Hexane
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
lodomethane
Methylene Chloride
Toluene
Isooctane
m-/p-Xylene
1 ,3 Dichlorobenzene
1 ,4 Dichlorobenzene
1,2 Dichlorobenzene
Trichlorofluoromethane
P-Cymene
Field
MBCLO
HJ147
0.0
0.0
—
0.1
0.0
—
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
—
—
—
0.4
Laboratory
09/23/92
HJ146
0.0
0.0
—
0.0
-i-
--
0.0
—
—
0.0
0.0
—
0.0
—
—
09/23/92
BC598***
—
0.4
1.4
—
—
09/25/92
BC625**
0.2
0.3
—
—
—
—
0.2
—
—
0.4
0.5
0.7
—
0.5
09/28/92
BC640**
0.3
0.3
— .
i ,
\ :
0.2
09/29/92
BC658**
—
1 —
V
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.3
10/12/92
BC837**
—
—
--
—
—
5.3
0.5
0.6
Os
-------
TABLE 6-4
VOST AUDIT SAMPLES
Date
Start Time
Stop Time :
Sampling Parameters:
Volume Sampled
Meter Temperature, C
Barometric, mm Hg
Meter Delta H, In H2O
DOM Gamma
Volume Sampled, DSL
Concentration, ppb
Acryf on (trite
Benzene
1,3-^butadiene
Carbon Dlsulfide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chloroform ';
Chloromethane
:.1,1,t-frldhlofoethanB :
Methylene Chloride
Tetrachloroethene ;
Toluene
Isooctane
Vinyl Chloride
m-/p-Xylene
o-Xylene
Acetone
Trlehlorof lu oromethan a
A-Pinene
6-Pinene ;
A
9/21/92
1028
1048
f
9.491
20
758
0.4
1.001
9.483
--
45.7
--
16.8
7.8
2.8
1.1
0.2
11.0
117.8
0.6
2.4
16.2
0.1
--
3.1
0.6
0.1
Audit 527
B
9/21/92
1057
1117
10.302
20
758
0.4
1:001
10.293
--
42.1
--
15.4
7.2
2.6
1.0
0.2
10.1
108.5
0.6
2.2
14.9
0.1
2.8
0.6 '
0.1
M
c
9/21/92
1127
1147
9.954
20
758
0.4
1.001
9.945
--
27.6
--
10.9
8.4
1.2
--
4.1
168.2
0.7
1.6
13.9
0.1
0.8
0.1
""
Average
--
--
--
--
--
—
—
—
0.0
38.4
00
14.4
7.8
2.2
0.7
01
8.4
131.5
0.7
2.0
15.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
2.2
0.4
0.1
A
9/21/92
1232
1252
10.081
20
758
0.4
1.001
10.072
1.1
—
3.4
--
0.0
1.7
—
0.1
29.9
0.3
0.3
1.9
--
0.3
39.0
0.2
1.6
0.1
~
Audit
B ''.-...
9/21/92
1057
1117
10.902
20
758
0.4
1.001
10.892
1.5
-.-
3.2
--
0
19
—
0.1
31
0
0 .,
11.5
-
0 ,
35.3
O.F
20
0
~"
- .;; c
9/21/92
1127
1147
10.326
20
758
0.4
1.001
10.317
1.3
—
3.2
--
0.0
1.2
—
0.1
29.4
0.1
0.3
0.8
--
0.3
38.5
0.2
1.6
0.1
~~ ~~
Average
--
—
--
--
--
—
--
—
1.3
0.0
3.3
0.0
0.0
7.3
0.0
0.1
30.3
0.2
0.4
4.7
0.0
0.3
37.6
0.3
6.1
0.1
0.0
OJ
-------
Some of the data quality indicators to used for data validation are:
1. Comparison of the relative concentrations of the emissions at the different sampling
locations;
2. Comparison of the results to previous field test results (i.e., are there any
similarities);
3. Comparison of the results for a particular parameter with those from each condition
(i.e., are the concentrations similar and do they show the same relationship for a
material balance).
4. The inlet and outlet volumetric flow rates were compared. Agreement within these
two trains were ± 10 percent.
All data and/or calculations for flow rates, moisture content, and isokinetic rates made using
a computer software program were validated by an independent check. All calculations
were spot checked for accuracy and completeness.
In general, all measurement data was validated based on the following criteria:
• Process conditions during sampling or testing;
• Acceptable sample collection procedures;
• Consistency with expected other results; and
• Adherence to prescribed QC procedures.
Any suspect data is flagged and identified according to the specific deviation from
prescribed criteria and its potential effect on the data quality. Upon completion of testing,
the field coordinator was responsible for preparation of a data summary including
calculation, results and raw data sheets.
6.6 CORRECTIVE ACTIONS
No corrective action measures were implemented during this assignment. However,
WESTON has received notification of a possible field contamination problem associated
with the VOST condensate samples. WESTON has initiated corrective measures to address
6-14 -:,
-------
this concern. All HPLC squeeze bottles and HPLC water sources will be investigated prior
to the initiation of any future Work Assignments associated with the wood products industry.
6.7 OA AUDITS
A VOST audit was the only audit conducted during this assignment. Results are discussed
in subsection 6 " " This audit involves the use of a multi-gas audit cylinder of known
concentration. A measured amount is drawn into the VC5^ sample system and analyzed
with other project samples. This audit can provide an estimate of method precision and
accuracy. EPA does not assign a pass or fail value for this audit. Typically agreement is
better than 50% relative difference for all audit tubes analyzed.
6-15
-------
SECTION 7
SUMMARY OF EMISSION FACTORS
This section summarizes the emission factors that were developed from the test data.
The emission factors are presented in five tables. Table 7-1 summarizes the emission
factors developed for uncontrolled emissions L win the particle dryer. The emission
factors in Table 7-1 are presented in units of kilograms of pollutant emitted per
megagram (kg/Mg) of wood particles fed to the dryer on a dry basis
(pounds per ton [lb/ton]).
Table 7-2 summarizes the uncontrolled emission factors developed for the MDF press
based on the combined emissions from all five vents. It should be noted that, for the
j
aldehyde-ketone test, emission data were not available for Vent 2, Run 3 and for Vent 4,
Run 1. For these runs, the emission rates for each aldehyde or ketone were estimated
using the average concentrations of the same pollutant for the other two runs and the
volumetric flow rate through the vent for the run for which emission data were not
available. The emission factorsTn Table 7-2 are presented in units of kg of pollutant
&--
emitted per thousand square meters (Ib per thousand square feet) of board produced.
Table 7-3 summarizes the emission factors developed for uncontrolled and controlled
emissions from the microboard surface dryer. The emission factors in Table 7-3 are
presented in units of kg/Mg (lb/ton) of material dried.
Table 7-4 summarizes the emission factors developed for uncontrolled and controlled
" emissions from the microboard core dryer. The eTnission factors in Table 7-4 are
presented in units of kg/Mg (lb/ton) of material dried.
Table 7-5 summarizes the uncontrolled emission factors for emissions from the
microboard press. As explained previously, the microboard press has a total of eight
vents. Vents 1, 3, 5, 7, and 8 were tested, and Vents 2, 4, and 6 were not tested. Vents
7-1
-------
1, 3, and 5 are paired with Vents 2, 4, and 6, respectively. Emissions from Vents 2, 4,
and 6 are assumed to be comparable to emissions from Vents 1, 3, and 5. Therefore, the
emission rates for the entire microboard press were estimated by summing the emissions
rates measured in Vents 7, and 8, and doubling the emission rates in Vents 1, 3, and 5 to
account for the fact that emissions from Vents 2, 4, and 6 were not quantified. The
emission factors in Table 7-5 a*« presented in units of kg of pollutant emitted per
thousand-square meters (Ib per thousand square feet) of board produced.
7-2
-------
TABLE 7-1. SUMMARY OF EMISSION FACTORS FOR PARTICLE DRYER
Type of
control
none
Pollutant
fill. PM
condens. inorg. PM
condens. org. PM
PM-10
No. of
runs
3
3
3
3
Emission factors, kg/Mg
Minimum
0.51
0.074
0.041
0.047
Maximum
0.66
0.40
0.10
0.22
Average
0.59
0.24
0.074
0.11
Emission factors, IbAon
Minimum
1.0
0.15
0.082
0.094
Maximum
1.3
0.80
0.19
0.44
Average
1.2
0.49
0.15
0.21
CEM Results
total hydrocarbons 3 0.30 0.35
0.33 0.60 0.70 0.66
Aldehyde-ketone results
formaldehyde
acetaldehyde
•jfe.. . -^ijj&in
acetone
propanaldehyde
crotonaldehyde
n-butyraldehyde
methyl ethyl ketone
benzaldehyde
isoveraldehyde
valeraldehyde
o-tolualdehyde
m/p-tolualdehyde
hexaldehyde
2, 5-dimethylbenzaldehyde
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
0.51
0.0025
6.8E-04
9.1E-04
3.8E-04
7.0E-04
9.2E-04
0.0022
7.8E-04
6.0E-04
6.8E-04
1.9E-04
3.8E-04
7.7E-04
1.2E-04
0.58
0.0074
0.0012
0.0022
4.5E-04
7.7E-04
0.0013
0.0030
0.0013
0.0010
0.0011
3.7E-04
0.0022-
0.0014
1.8E-04
0.55
0.0051
8.6E-04
0.0015
4.2E-04
7.4E-04
0.0011
0.0025
0.0010
7.3E-04
8.2E-04
2.9E-04
1.4E-03
1.0E-03
1.5E-04
1.0
0.0050
0.0014
0.0018
7.6E-04
0.0014
0.0018
0.0044
0.0016
0.0012
0.0014
3.7E-04
0.00077
0.0015
0.00024
1.2
0.015
0.0023
0.0044
9.0E-04
0.0015
0.0026
0.0060
0.0025
0.0019
0.0021
7.3E-04
0.0043
0.0029
0.00036
1.1
0.010
"HB.0017
0.0031
8.4E-04
0.0015
0.0022
0.0049
0.0020
0.0015
0.0016
5.8E-04
0.0028
0.0020
0.00030
Semi-VOST results
p-cymene
a-pinene
b-pinene
a-terpineol
3
3
3
3
0.0019
0.0021
7.3E-04
0.0030
0.0030
0.0010
0.0024
0.0026
8.7E-04
0.0038
0.0042
0.0015
0.0060
0.0060
0.0020
0.0048
0.0051
0.0017
VOST results
a-pinene
b-pinene
methylene chloride
trichlorofluoromethane
chloromethane
n-hexane
acetone
isooctane
p-cymene
toluene
2-butanone
1,1,1 -trichloroethane
chloroform
styrene
m-/p-xylene
bromomethane
cumene
carbon disulfide
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
—3-,
3
3
3
3
0.0019
0.0021
2.4E-04
1.0E-04
3.1E-04
8.8E-05
3.5E-04
4.1E-05
5.5E-05
3.8E-05
2.7E-05
2.7E-05
4.2E-06
1.4E-05
1.4E-05
3.6E-06
1 .OE-05
4.2E-06
0.0030
0.0029
0.0019
0.0014
7.4E-04
0.0011
5.2E-04
4.8E-04
7.8E-05
1.0E-04
7.0E-05
4.7E-05
7.5E-05
2.3E-05
2.3E-05
2.9E-05
2.3E-05
6.5E-06
0.0024
0.0024
0.0011
7.3E-04
0.0011
5.4E-04
4.4E-04
2.4E-04
6.7E-05
6.2E-05
4.4E-05
3.5E-05
2.8E-05
1.8E-05
1.8E-05
1.8E-05
1.5E-05
5.5E-06
0.0038
0.0042
4.8E-04
2.0E-04
6.1E-04
1.8E-04
7.0E-04
8.1E-05
1.1E-04
7.5E-05
5.4E-05
5.5E-05
8.3E-06
2p^-<>5
2.8E-05
7.2E-06
2.1E-05
8.3E-06
0.0060
0.0058
0.0038
0.0029
0.0015
0.0022
0.0010
9.7E-04
1.6E-04
2.0E-04
1.4E-04
9.4E-05
1.5E-04
4.6E-05
4.6E-05
5.8E-05
4.6E-05
1.3E-05
0.0048
0.0049
0.0022
0.0015
0.0022
0.0011
8.8E-04
4.8E-04
1.3E-04
1.2E-04
8.8E-UO
6.9E-05
5.6E-05
? C(^Q5
3.6E-05
3.5E-05
3.1E-05
1.1E-05
7-3
-------
TABLE 7-2. SUMMARY OF EMISSION FACTORS FOR MDF PRESS
Type of
control
none
Pollutant
filt. PM
condens. inorg. PM
condi is. org. PM
i M-10
No. of
runs
1
2
1
1
Emission factors, kg/thousand sq.m.
Minimum
0.70
0.48
0.11
0.34
GEM Results
total hj drocarbons
1
2.7
Maximum
1.3
1.8
0.24
0.47
2.9
Aldehyde-ketone results
formaldehyde
acetaldehyde
acrolein
acetone
propanaldehyde
crotonaldehyde
n-butyraldehyde
methyl ethyl ketone
benzaldehyde
isove aldehyde
valer aldehyde
o-tolualdehyde
m/p-tolualdehyde
hexaldehyde
2,5-dimethylbenzaldehyde
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3.2
0.029
0.0068
0.022
0.0022
0.0049
0.016
0.0025
f 0031
1 ,0070
H).013
0.0021
0.0050
0.017
0.0075
3.7
0.035
0.0074
0.062
0.0024"
0.0092
0.025
0.0048
0.0046
0.0098
0.016
0.0039
0.0069
0.038
0.011
Average
0.94
1.1
0.20
0.38
2.8
3.5
0.032
0.0071
0.039
0.0023
0.0077
0.020
0.0036
0.0038
0.0087
0.015
0.0032
0.0061
0.025
0.0087
Emission! actors, Ib/thousand sq.ft
Minimum'
0.14
0.10
0.023
0.069
0.56
0.66
0.0060
0.0014
0.0045
4.5E-04
0.0010
0.0033
5.1E-04
6.4E-04
0.0014
0.0027
4.3E-04
0.0010
0.0035
0.001 8
Maximum
0.26
0.37
0.049
0.10
0.60
0.76
0.0071
0.0015
0.013
5.0E-04
0.0019
0.0051
0.0010
9.4E-04
0.0020
0.0032
8.0E-04
0.0014
0.0077
0.0022
Average
0.19
0.22
0.040
0.079
0.58
0.72
0.0065
0.0015
0.0080
4.7E-04
0.0016
0.0040
7.5E-04
7.8E-04
0.0018
0.0030
6.6E-04
0.0013
0.0050
0.0018
-------
TABLE 7-3. SUMMARY OF EMISSION FACTORS FOR MICROBOARD SURFACE DRYER
Type of
control
none
EFB
Pollutant
fill. PM
condens. inorg. PM
condens. org. PM
C02
No. of
runs
3
3
3
13
Emission factors, kg/Mg
Minimum
0.86
0.079
0.14
290
CEM Results
total hydrocarbons
fill. PM
condens. inorg. PM
condens. org. PM
PM-10
3
2
2
2
3
0.50
0.13
0.032
0.035
0.032
CEM Results
CO
NOx
total hydrocarbons
3
3
3
0.57
0.66
0.46
Maximum
1.2
0.10
0.42
420
1.0
0.14
0.14
0.036
0.14
1.9
0.73
0.75
Aldehyde-ketone results
formaldehyde
acetaldehyde
acrolein
acetone
propanaldehyde
crotonaldehyde
n-butyraldehyde
methyl ethyl ketone
benzaldehyde
isoveraldehyde
valeraldehyde
o-tolualdehyde
m/p-tolualdehyde
hexaldehyde
2,5-dimethylbenzaldehyde
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
0.0056
0.0017
1.9E-04
0.0053
1.0E-04
2.9E-04
8.3E-04
4.7E-05
Z8E-03
3.9E-04
0.0015
Z1E-04
0.0013
0.0022
4.8E-04
0.016
0.0043
5.5E-04
0.0078
3.3E-04
5.2E-04
0.0011
Z9E-04
0.0066
7.5E-04
0.0026
4.8E-04
0.0038
0.0037
8.9E-04
Semi-VOST results
p-cymene
a-pinene
b-pinene
a-terpineol
3
3
3
3
4.4E-04
0.17
0.057
0.023
5.4E-04
0.20
0.064
0.030
VOST results
a-pinene
b-pinene
methylene chloride
trichlorofluoromethane
chloromethane
n-hexane
acetone
isooctane
n-*-"- — --
to;
m-/p-xylene
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
0.21
0.090
/- —
1.6E-06
1.6E-06
1.6- "
0.015
1.6E-OR
3.5E-06
0.34
0.13
3.4E-06
0.020
"6.017
3,4P_nfi
2.0E-04
Average
1.0
0.09
0.25
351
0.75
0.14
0.11
0.036
0.082
1.2
0.69
0.64
0.0094
0.0026
4.1E-04
0.0066
1.9E-04
4.1E-04
0.0010
1.7E-04
0.0041
5.5E-04
0.0020
3.3E-04
0.0023
0.0031
7.4E-04
4.9E-04
0.18
0.060
0.026
0.28
0.11
Z8E-Q6 I
Emission factors, IbAon
Minimum
1.7
0.16
0.28
580
1.0
0.27
0.16
0.071
n 063
1.1
1.3
0.92
0.011
0.0034
3.7E-04
0.011
2.0E-04
5.8E-04
0.0017
9.4E-05
0.0056
7.8E-04
0.0030
4.2E-04
0.0026
0.0045
0.0010
8.9E-04
0.33
0.11
0.046
0.43
0.18
3.2E-06
0.0065 | 3.2E-06
0.016
2.8E-06
0.0011
".3E-04
1.0E-04
0.029
3.2E-06
0.0014
7.8E-04
6.9E-06
Maximum
2.3
0.19
0.83
840
2.0
0.29
0.27
0.073
(j.*-u
3.8
1.5
1.5
0.032
0.0086
0.0011
0.016
6.7E-04
0.0010
0.0021
5.9E-04
0.013
0.0015
0.0051
0.0010
0.0075
0.0074
0.0018
0.001 1
0.39
0.13
0.061
0.68
096
6.9E-06~I
0.039 I
0.034
6.9E-06
0.0037
0.0017
4.0E-04
Average
ZO
0.18
0.49
702
1.5
0.28
0.22
0.072
---- 0.16
2.3
1.4
1.3
0.019
0.0052
8.1E-04
0.013
3.9E-04
8.2E-04
0.0019
3.4E-04
0.0082
0.0011
0.0040
6.6E-04
0.0046
0.0062
0.0015
•
0.0010
0.36
0.12
0.052
0.57
0.21
----- - _-sri™J»
5.6E-06
0.013
0.6E-06
0.032
5.6E-06
0.0022
0.0013
2.0E-04
7-5
-------
TABLE 7-4. SUMMARY OF EMISSION FACTORS FOR MICROBOARD CORE DRYER
Type of
contra
none
EFB
Pollutant
fill. PM
condens. inorg. PM
condens. org. PM
C02
No. of
runs
3
3
3
13
Emission factors, kg/Mg
Minimum
0.98
0.36
0.42
260
Maximum
1.7
0.43
0.55
450
Average
1.3
0.40
0.48
360
Emission factors, Ib/ton
Minimum
2.0
0.72
0.84
520
Maximum
3.4
0.86
1.1
900
Average
25
0.81
0.96
720
CEM Results
total hydrocarbons
filt. PM
condens. inorg. PM
condens. org. PM
PM-10
3
2
2
2
2
3.7
0.14
0.48
0.23
0.21
5.4
1.4
0.49
0.26
«:40
4.5
0.75
0.48
O1"1
7.5
0.28
0.95
0.46
0.32 ~ 0.43
11
2.7
0.98
0.51
0.81
9.1
1.51
0.97
0.48
0.64
CEM Results
CO
NOx
total hydrocarbons
3
3
3
1.5
0.58
3.1
1.6
0.72
5.0
1.5
0.66
3.9
2.9
1.2
6.2
3.2
1.4
10.0
3.1
1.3
7.8
Aldehyde-ketone results
formaldehyde
acetaldehyde
acrolein
acetone
propanaldehyde
crotonaldehyde
n-butyraldehyde
methyl ethyl ketone
benzaldehyde
isoveraldehyde
valeraldehyde
o-tolualdehyde
m/p-tolualdehyde
hexaldehyde
2,5-dimethylbenzaldehyde
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
0.070
0.036
0.0059
0.023
0.0019
0.0026
0.0055
0.0044
0.054
0.009
0.0040
0.0044
0.005
0.010
0.0008
0.095
0.038
0.017
0.072
0.0094
0.010
0.027
0.0049
0.069
' 0.010
0.010
0.0057
0.018
0.013
0.0062
0.084
0.037
0.012
0.048
0.0054
0.0051
0.015
0.0046
0.060
0.009
0.0070
0.0053
0.013
0.011
0.0026
0.14
0.071
0.012
0.045
0.0037
0.0052
0.011
0.0089
0.11
0.017
0.0080
0.0088
0.010
0.020
0.0017-
0.19
0.077
0.035
0.14
0.019
0.020
0.053
0.0099
0.14
0.019
0.019
0.011
0.037
0.026
0.0123
0.17
0.074
0.024
0.096
0.011
0.010
0.030
0.0092
0.12
0.018
0.014
0.011
0.026
0.022
0.0053-
Semi-VOST results
p-cymene
a-pmene
b-pinene
a-terpineol
1
1
1
1
• 9.8E-07
1.0
0.38
0.070
0.0033
1.4
0.42
0.094
0.0022
1.2
0.40
0.083
1.95E-06
2.0
0.75
0.14
0.0067
2.7
0.83
0.19
0.0044
2.3
0.79
0.17
VOST results
a-pmene
b-pine-
methylene chloride
chloromethane
1
2
1
0.16
1.3E-Q4 I
1.1
0.0019
3.9E-06 | 3.2E-04
acetone
isooctane
p-cvmnno
2-butanone
chloroform
styrene
cumene
benzene
iodomethane
o-xylene
1
1
3.9E-06
0.0029
0.0052
o.0022
3.9E-06
3.9E-06
4.1E-06
6.7E-04
3.9E-06
3.9E-06
4.1E-06
5.7E-05
0.010
0.015
0.0069
6.3E-04
9.0E-05
Z3E-04
0.0017
0.0023
3.1E-04
2.8E-04
0.79
0.001 fl
1.1E-04 I
2.2E-05
0.0075
0.011
0.0038
2.2E-04
3.6E-05
1.2E-04
0.0010
7.8E-04
1.1E-04
1.5E-04
0.32
2.5E^T
- 7.8E-06
0.062
7.8E-06
0.0058
0.010
0.0043
7.8E-06
7.8E-06
8.2E-06
0.0013
7.8E-06
7.8E-06
8.2E-06
_ .,£2
.-**• ' i:2'
0.0037
6.3E-04
0.48
1.1E-04
0.020
0.031
0.014
0.0013
1.8E-04
4.6E-04
0.0034
0.0047
6.1E-04
5.6E-04
1.6
0.85
0.0022
2.2E-04
0.29
4.3E-05
0.015
0.021
0.0076
4.3E-04
7.2E-05
2.4E-04
0.0020
0.0016
2.1E-04
3.0E-04
7-6
-------
TABLE 7-5. SUMMARY OF EMISSION FACTORS FOR MICROBOARD PRESS
Type of
control
none
Pollutant
filt. PM
condens. Inorg. PM
condens. org. PM
PM-10
No. of
runs
3
3
3
3
Emission factors, kg/thousand sq.m.
Minimum
0.16
0.15
0.057
0.058
Maximum
0.30
0.29
0.11
0.12
Average
0.22
0.24
0.086
0.091
Emission factors, Ib/thousand sq.ft
Minimum
0.032
0.030
0.012
0.012
Maximum
0.062
0.059
0.022
0.024
Average
0.044
0.049
0.018
0.019
CEi/l Results
total hydrocarbons
3
4.3
6.3
5.2
0.8V
1.3
1.1
Aldehyde-ketone results
formaldehyde
acetaldehyde
acrolein
acetone
propanaldehyde
crotonaldehyde
n-butyraldehyde
methyl ethyl ketone
benzaldehyde
isoveraldehyde
valeraldehyde
o-tolualdehyde
i/p-tolualdehyde
hexaldehyde
2, t nethylbenzaldehyde
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
1.8
0.025
0.0061
0.036
9.1E-05
0.031
0.0082
6.2E-04
0.0064
0.0059
0.0077
4.0E-04
0.0033
0.016
0.0015
2.3
0.030
0.0089
0.068
7.9E-04
0.040
0.011
0.0023
0.010
0.0091
0.018
6.2E-04
0.0053
0.042
0.0023
2.0
0.028
0.0073
0.049
5.3E-04
0.035
0.009
0.0016
0.0085
0.0078
0.012
5.3E-04
0.0043
0.028
0.0018
1.36
O.U)51
0.0012
0.0074
1.9E-05
0.0063
0.0017
1.3E-04
0.0013
0.0012
0.0016
8.1E-05
6.8E-04
0.0033
3.1E-04
0.48
0.0062
0.0018
0.014
1 .6E-04
0.0082
0.0022
4.7E-04
0.0020
0.0019
0.0036
1.3E-04
0.0011
0.0086
4.8E-04
0.42
0.0058
0.0015
0.0099
1.1E-04
0.0072
0.0019
3.3E-04
0.0017
0.0016
0.0025
1.1E-04
8.8E-04
0.0057
3.7E-04
-------
01
APPENDIX A
TEST RESULTS
-------
02
APPENDIX A-l
MDF CYCLONE OUTLET (DB)
-------
ALDEHDEHDES/KETONESTEST RESULTS
PLANT: Weyerhaeuser Company, Moncure, NC
SAMPLING LOCATION: MDF Particle Dryer B Cyclone Outlet (DB)
Test Date
Run Start & Finish Times
Net Traversing Points
Net Run Time, Minutes
Nozzle Diameter, Inches
Pilot Tube Coefficient
Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor
Barometric Pressure, Inches Hg
GGu03
Dia
Cp
Y
Pbar
Delta H
Vm
tm
Vm(std)
Vic
Vw
%H20
Mfd
%CQ2'
%O2
%CO+N2
Md
Ms
Pg
Ps
ts
Delta-P
vs
A
Qsd
Qaw
Avg. Pressure Differential of
Orifice Meter, Inches H2O
Volume of Metered Gas Sample, Dry ACF
Dry Gas Meter Temperature, Degrees F
Volume of Metered Gas Sample, Dry SCF*
Total Volume of Liquid Collected
in Impingers & Silica Gel, mL
Volume of Water Vapor, SCF*
Moisture Content, Percent by Volume
Dry Mole Fraction
Carbon Dioxide, Percent by Volume, Dry
Oxygen, Percent by Volume, Dry
CO + N2, Percent by Volume, Dry
Gas Molecular Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole, Dry
Gas Molecular Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole, Wet
Flue Gas Static Pressure, Inches H2O
Absolute Flue Gas Pressure,- Inches Hg
Flue Gas Temperature, Degrees F
Average Velocity Head, Inches H2O
Flue Gas Velocity, Feet per Second
Stack/Duct Area, Square Inches
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM*
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Wet ACFM
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, Percent
MDFCO-MOOU-l
9-25-92
1326-1500
24
72
0.244
0.84
0.995
30.000
1.513
46.063
65
46.373
112.7
5.305
10.3
0.897
0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
27.72
-0.3
29.98
158
0.4408
41.13
6,611
86,955
113,304
104.7
MDFCO-MOOll-2
9-25-92
1626-1741
24
72
0.244
0.84
0.995
30.000
1.647
47.325
69
47.326
96.5
4.542
8.8
0.912
0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
27.89
-0.3
29.98
155
0.5088
43.94
6,611
94,900
121,045
97.9
MDFCO-MOOll-3
9-25-92
1843-2018
24
72
0.244
0.84
0.995
30.000
1.710
48.616
69
48.553
109.3
5.145
9.6
0.904
0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
27.80
-0.3
29.98
152
0.5263
44.64
6,611
96,124
122,973
99.2
1 68 Deg. F (20 C) - - 29.92 In. Mercury
(continued next page)
-------
ALDEHYDES/KETONES TEST RESULTS
oc
MDPCO-M0011-1
EMISSION RESULTS:
Fwt
ng
ng/dscm
ppmvd
kg/hr
Ib/hr
FORMALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
jig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ACETALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-molc
Catch Weight, micrograms
fig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds r"n " " ,
ACROLEiiM
Formula Weight, Ib/lb— mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
/ig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ACETONE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
'Catch Weight, micrograms
tig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
PROPIONALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb— mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
/ig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
CROTONALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
n - BUTYRALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
/ig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
fig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
30
46,732
35,584
28.534
5.258
11.5913
44.1
493
375
0.2048
0.05547
0.12228
56.1
68
51.8
0.0222
0.00765
0.01687
58
204
155
0.0644
0.02295
0.05060
58.1
38
28.9
0.0120
0.00428
0.00943
70
65
49.5
0.0170
0.00731
0.01612
72.1
100
76.1
0.0254
0.01125
0.02480
72.1
203
155
0.0516
0.02284
0.05035
MDFCO-MOOU-2
30
51,981
38,784
31.100
6.254
13.7879
44.1
224
167
0.0912
0.02695
0.05942
56.1
61
45.5
0.0195
0.00734
0.01618
58
82
61.2
0.0254
0.00987
0.02175
58.1
34
25.4
0.0105
0.00409
0.00902
70
68
50.7
0.0174
0.00818
0.01804
72.1
83
61.9
0.0207
0.00999
0.02202
72 Jl _.
202
151
0.0503
0.02430
0.05358
MDPCO-M0011-3
30
47,961
34,880
27.969
5.69712
12.5601
44.1
640
465
0.2539
0.07602
0.16760
56.1
100
72.7
0.0312
0.01188
0.02619
58
132
96.0
0.0398
0.01568
0.03457
58.1
39
28.4
0.0117
0.00463
0.01021
70
66
48.0
0.0165
0.00784
0.01728
72.1
112
81.5
0.0272
0.01330
0.02933
72.1
257
187
0.0624
0.03053
0.06730
•
SSij: EttinuUrd catch wrigtu
• 68 Deg. P (20 C) - - 2952 In. Mercury
(continued next page)
19-Af»-93
-------
ALDEHYDES/KETONES TEST RESULTS
0
0005
MDPCO-M0011-1 MDPCO-M0011-Z MDFCO-MOOll-3
EMISSION RESULTS:
BENZALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb—mole 106.1 106.1 106.1
Catch Weight, micrograms 72 114 85
/ig per dry std. cubic meter* 54.8 85.1 61.8
ppm by volume, Dry 0.01243 0.01929 0.01402
kilograms per hour 0.00810 0.01372 0.01010
pounds per hour 0.01786 0.03024 0.02226
ISOVALERALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole 86.1 86.1 86.1
Catch Weight, micrograms 59 " 54 83
Mg per dry std. cubic meter* 44.9 40.3 60.4
ppm by volume, Dry 0.01255 0.01126 0.01687
kilograms per hour .& 0.00664 0.00650 0.00986
pounds per hour 0.01463 0.01432 —n«Z174
VALERALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole 86.1 86.1 86.1
Catch Weight, micrograms 66 61 92
/ig per dry std. cubic meter* 50.3 45.5 66.9
ppm by volume, Dry 0.01404 0.01272 0.01869
kilograms per hour 0.00743 0.00734 0.01093
pounds per hour 0.01637 0.01618 0.02409
o-TOLUALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole 120.2 120.2 120.2
Catch Weight, micrograms 34 '28 16
H% per dry std. cubic meter* 25.9 20.9 11.6
ppm by volume, Dry 0.00518 0.00418 0.00233
kilograms per hour 0.00383 0.00337 0.00190
pounds per hour 0.00843 0.00743 0.00419
m/p-TOLUALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole 120.2 120.2 120.2
Catch Weight, micrograms 161 194 33
jig per dry std. cubic meter* 123 145 24.0
ppm by volume, Dry 0,02454 0.02897 0.00480
kilograms-per hour 0.01811 0.02334 0.00392
pounds per hour 0.03993 0.05146 0.00864
HEXALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole 100.16 100.16 100.16
Catch Weight, micrograms 79 69 125
US per dry std. cubic meter* - 60.2 . 51.5 90.9
ppm by volume, Dry . 0.01445 0.01236 0.02183
kilograms per hour 0.00889 0.00830 0.01485
pounds per hour 0.01959 0.01830 0.03274
2,5-DIMETHYL BENZALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole 134 134 134
Catch Weight, micrograms 11 16 13
Mg per dry sld. cubic meter* 838 11.9 9.45
ppm by volume, Dry 0.00150 0.00214 0.00170
kilograms per hour 0.00124 0.00193 0.00154
pounds per hour 0.00273 0.00424 0.00340
Ugl Estimated catch weight
• 68 Deg. F (20 C) — 2952 In. Mercury
-------
PARTICULATE & CONDENSIBLE PARTICULATE TEST RESULTS
oco
PLANT: Weyerhaeuser Company, Moncure, NC
SAMPLING LOCATION: MDF Cyclone Outlet (WEYCO I.D. DB)
Test Date
Run Start & Finish Times
Net Traversing Points
Net Run Time, Minutes
Nttt2ie Diameter, Ic~' s
Pitot Tube Coefficient
Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor
Barometric Pressure, Inches Hg
Theta
Dia
Cp
Y
Pbar
Delta H
Vm
tm
Vm(std)
Vic
Vw
%H20
Mfd
%C02
%O2
%CO+N2
Md
Ms
Pg
Ps
ts
Delta-P
vs
A
Qsd
Qaw
Avg. Pressure Differential of
Orifice Meter, Inches H2O
Volume of Metered Gas Sample, Dry ACF
Dry Gas Meter Temperature, Degrees F
Volume of Metered Gas Sample, Dry SCF"
Total Volume of Liquid Collected
in Impingers & Silica Gel, mL
Volume of Water Vapor, SCF*
^Moisture Content, Percent by Volume
Dry Mole Fraction
Carbon Dioxide, Percent by Volume, Dry
Oxygen, Percent by Volume, Dry
CO + N2, Percent by Volume, Dry
Gas Molecular Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole, Dry
Gas Molecular Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole, Wet
Flue Gas Static Pressure, Inches H2O
Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, Inches Hg
Flue Gas Temperature, Degrees F
Average Velocity Head, Inches H2O
Flue Gas Velocity, Feet per Second
Stack/Duct Area, Square Inches
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM*
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Wet ACFM
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, Percent
MDPCO-MS/2Q2-1 MDFCO-M5/202-2 MDFCO-M5/202-3
9-25-92
1327-1457
24
72
0.275
0.8*
0.994
30.000
2.491
^58.627
71
58.466
142.0
6.684
10.3
0.897
0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
27.72
-0.2
29.99
160
0.4408
41.17
6,611
86,866
113,414
104.1
9-25-92
1626-1745
24
72
0.245
0.84
0.994
30.000
2.494
52.807
74 .
52.337
116.0
5.460
9.4
0.906
0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
27.82
-0.2
29.99
158
0.5088
44.08
6,611
94,243
121,431
108.2
9-25-92
1843-2021
24
72
0.245
0.84
0.994
30.000
2.494
54.732
75
54.193
138.0
6.496
10.7
0.893
0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
27.68
-0.2
29.99
156
0.5263
44.87
6,611
94,885
123,607
111.2
- 68 Deg. F (20 C) — 29.92 In. Mercury
(continued next page)
-------
PARTICULATE & CONDENSIBLE PARTICULATE TEST RESULTS
00007
MDPCO-M5/202-1 MDPCO-M5/202-2 MPFCO-M5/202-3
PARTICULATE RESULTS:
Filterable
mg Catch Weight, milligrams
mg/DSCM Milligrams/Dry Std. Cubic Meter*
gr/DSCF Grains per Dry Std. Cubic Foot*
kg/hr Kilograms per hour
Ib/hr Pounds per hour
Condensable — Extractable
'Catch Weight, milligrams
Milligrams/Dry Std. Cubic Meter*
Grains per Dry Std. Cubic Foot*
Kilograms per hour
Founds per hour
c""tensablc - Non-Extractable
Catch Weight, milligrams
Milligrams/Dry Std. Cubic Meter*
Grains per Dry Std. Cubic Foot*
Kilograms per hour
Pounds per hour
Total Participate
Catch Weight, milligrams
Milligrams/Dry Std. Cubic Meter*
Grains per Dry Std. Cubic Foot*
Kilograms per hour
Pounds per hour
59.7
36.1
0.0158
5.32
11.7
0.00108
0.365
0.806
40.0
24.2
0.0106
3.57
7.86
103.8
62.7
0.0274
9.25
20.4
59.1
39.9
0.0174
6.39
14.1
6.9
4.66
0.00203
0.745
1.64
5.9
3.98
0.00174
0.637
1.41
71.9
48.5
0.0212
7.77
17.1
63.7
41.5
0.0181
6.69
14.8
9.2
0.00262
0.966
2.13
24.4
15.9
0.00695
2.56
5.65
97.3
63.4
0.0277
10.2
22.5
-------
0000
PM10 TEST RESULTS
PLANT: Weyerhaeuser Company, Moncure, NC
SAMPLING LOCATION: MDF Cyclone Outlet (WEYCO LD. DB)
Test Date
Run Start & Finish Times
Net Traversing Points
Net Run Time, MiDMtr-.
Nozzle Diameter, Inches
Pilot Tube Coefficient
Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor
Barometric Pressure, Inches Hg
Theta
Dia
Cp
Y
Pbar
Delta H
Vm
tm
Vm(std)
Vic
Vw
Mfd
%CO2
%O2
Md
Ms
Pg
Ps
ts
Delta-P
vs
A
Qsd
Qaw
Avg. Pressure Differential of
Orifice Meter, Inches H2O
Volume of Metered Gas Sample, Dry ACF
Dry Gas Meter Temperature, Degrees F
Volume of Metered Gas Sample, Dry SCF*
Total Volume of Liquid Collected
in Impingers & Silica Gel, mL
Volume of Water Vapor, SCF*
MGibiiufc Content, Percent by Volume
Dry Mole Fraction
Carbon Dioxide, Percent by Volume, Dry
Oxygen, Percent by Volume, Dry
CO -K N2, Percent by Volume, Dry
Gas Molecular Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole, Dry
Gas Molecular Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole, Wet
Flue Gas Static Pressure, Inches H2O
Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, Inches Hg
Flue Gas Temperature, De^i _ ^: ?
Average Velocity Head, Inches H2O
Flue Gas Velocity, Feet per Second
Stack/Duct Area, Square Inches
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM*
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Wet ACFM
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, Percent
MDFCO-M201A-1
9/26/92
1116-1457
24
116.25
"""*' 0.170
0.84
0.9938
30
0.54
45.906
87
44.173
114
5.366
10.8
0.892
0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
27.67
0.30
30.02
154
0.5962
47.68
6611
101,060
131,339
110.1
MDFCO-M201A-2
9/26/92
1707-1937
24
123.25
0.169
0.84
0.9938
30
0.54
49.141
86
47.411
110
5.178
9.8
0.902
0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
27.78
1^30
30.02
148
0.5696
46.29
6611
100,152
127,510
112.9
MDFCO-M201A-3
9/27/92
945-1248
24
lowest
0.170
0.84
0.9938
29.9
0.54
51.808
87
49.711
125
5.884
10.6
0.894
0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
27.69
0.30
29.92
151
0.5451
45.53
6611
96,897
125,417
115.1
* 68 Degrees F - - 29.92 Inches of Mercury (Hg). (Continued Next Page)
19-Apr-W
d:\uien\fci rkaun\«27u\f>inlO>«p|>\acopiilOi.v
-------
PM10 TEST RESULTS
00009
MDFCO-M201A-1 MDFCO-M201A-2 MDFCO-M201A-3
PM10 RESULTS:
ucyc
Qs
**>
mg
gr/DSCF
Icg/hr
Ib/hr
~>
%>PM10
% PM10, grams
PM10 Emissions:
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
Total Paniculate Emissions (Includes PM10):
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
Particulatc Fractionation:
> PM10, %
< PM10, %
193.5
0.494
9.5
0.0033
0.0730
0.00115
0.453
0.998
0.0267
10.5
95.7
4.3
192.8
0.490
9.5
0.0032
0.0607
0.00104
0.405
0.893
0.0208
8.09
-"; - -^ 17.8
95.0
5.0
192.9
0.493
9.5
0.0190
0.0968
0.00590
2.22
4.90
0.0359
7.44
16.4
83.6
16.4
-------
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS TEST RESULTS
0001
PLANT: Weyerhaeuser Company, Moncure, NC
SAMPLING LOCATION: MDF Particle Dryer B Cyclone Outlet (WEYCO I.D. DB)
Test Date
Run Start & Finish Times
Net Traversing Points
Net Run Time, Minutes
Nozzle Diameter, Inches
Pitot Tube Coefficient
Dry Gas Meter Cain.-n'ion Factor
Theta
Dia
Cp
Y
Pbar
Barometric Pressure, Inches Hg
Delta H Avg. Pressure Differential of
Orifice Meter, Inches H2O
Vm Volume of Metered Gas Sample, Dry ACF
tm Dry Gas Meter Temperature, Degrees F
Vm(std) Volume of Metered Gas Sample, Dry SCF*
Vic Total Volume of Liquid Collected
in Impingers & Silica Gel, ml
Vw Volume of Water Vapor, SCF*
%H20 Moisture Content, Percent by Volume
Mid Dry. Mole Fraction
%CO2 Carbon Dioxide, Percent by Volume, Dry
%O2 Oxygen, Percent by Volume, Dry
%CO+N2 CO + N2, Percent by Volume, Dry
Md Gas Molecular Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole, Dry
Ms Gas Molecular Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole, Wet
J'-i-g Flue Gas Stanc Pressure, Inches H2O
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, Inches Hg
..--.- i IL.O was i oniperature, Degrees F
Delta-P Average Velocity Head, Inches H2O
vs. Flue Gas Velocity, Feet per Second
A Stack/Duct Area, Square Inches
Qsd Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM*
Qaw Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Wet ACFM
%l Isokinetic Sampling Rate, Percent
* 68 Deg. F (20 C) -- 29.92 In. Mercury
MDFCO-M0010-1
9-26-92
1109-1502
24
168
0.245
0.84
0.995
29.950
1.733
113.073
83
109.856
249.0
1 1 .720
_""•*&*
0.904
0.0
20.9
28.84
27.80
0
29.95
154
0.4908
43.21
6,611
92,617
119,034
99.0
MDFCO-M0010-2 MDFCO-M0010-3
9-26-92
1706-1945
24
t 168
0.245
0.84
0.995
29.950
1.628
109.107
84
105.877
252.0
11.862
.^Hfe,,.^* 10.1
0.899
"*» 0.0
20.9
^ •**«** 79 .,
28.84
27.75
0
29.95
147
0.4449
40.92 -
6,611
88,305
112,726
100.1
(continued next page)
9-27-92
941-1257
24
f58
0.245
0.84
0.995
29.900
1.540
108.459
89
103.978
266.0
12.521
10.7
0.893
0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
27.68
0
29.90
•* 150
0.4231
40.09
6,611
85,351
110,439
101.7
a27data\m0010\app\co-m0010.wk3
-------
SEMIVOLATILE ORG ANICS TEST RESULTS
0 0 0 j J
MDFCO-M0010-1 MDFCO-M0010-2
EMISSION RESULTS:
ACETOPHENONE
Fwt Formula Weight, Ib/Ib-mole
jjg Catch Weight, micrograms
jjg/dscm fjg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppmvd ppm by volume, Dry
kg/hr kilograms per hour
Ib/hr pounds per hour
BIS(2- ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATc
Formula Weight, Ib/lb—mole
. Caleb Weir -Aerograms
pg PJJ „ , std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
Dl - N - BUTYLPHTH ALATE
' —**" Formula Weight, Ib/Ib-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
j;g per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
NAPHTHALENE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb—mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
/jg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
PHENOL
Formula Weight Ib/lb—mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
/jg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
BUTYLBENZYLPHTHALATE
Formula Weight, Ib/Ib-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
/jg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
120.1
15.9
5
0.001
0.001
0.0018
390.5
17.9
6
0.0004
0.00091
0.00200
278.3
18.2
6
0.0005
0.00092
0.00203
128.2
42.9
14
0.0026
0.00217
0.00478
94.1
14.6
5
0.0012
0.00074
0.00163
312
120.1
18.2
6
0.001
0.00091
0.0020
390.5
23.1
8
0.0005
0.00116
3.00255
278.3
6.3
2
0.0002
0.00032
0.00070
128.2
47.3
16
0.0030
0.00237
0.00522
94.1
MDFCO-M0010-3
120.1
16.7
6
0.001
0.00082
0.0018
390.5
15.0
5
0.0003
0.00074
0.00163
278.3
14.6
5
0.0004
0.00072
0.00159
128.2
312
7.7
3
0.0002
0.00039
0.00085
94.1
13.2
4
0.0011
0.00065
0.00143
312
*68Deg. F (20 C) -- 29.92 In. Mercury
(continued next page)
a27data\m0010\app\co - m0010.wk3
-------
OQOj
SEMIVOLATILE ORGAN1CS TEST RESULTS
P-CYMENE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb—mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
pg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
A-PINENE
Formula '-"'sight, Ib/lb—mole
Catch weight micrograms
/jg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
B-PINENE
Formula Weight Ib/lb—mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
/jg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
A-TERPINEOL
Formula Weight Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
/jg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
MDFCO-M0010-1
134.2
10.6
3
0.0006
0.00054
0.00118
136.2
402.1
129
0.02283
0.02034
0.04484
136.2
453.9
146
0.02577
0.02296
0.05062
154.3
152.4
49
0.00764
0.00771
0.01700
MDFCO-M0010-2
134.2
15.9
5
0.0010
0.00080
0.00175
136.2
516.5
172
0.03042
0.02585
0.05698
136.2
515.4
172
0.03036
0.02579
0.05686
154.3
176.6
59
0.00918
0.00884
0.01948
MDFCO-M0010-3
134.2
11.2
4
0.0007
0.00055
0.00122
136.2
388.2
'1 32.
0.02328
0.01912
0.04215
136.2
433.4
147
0.02600
0.02135
0.04706
154.3
148.2
50
0.00785
0.00730
0.01609
' 68 Deg. F (20 C) — 29.92 In. Mercury
a27data\m0010\app\co- m0010.wkC
-------
VOLATILE ORGANIC TEST RESULTS
PLANT: Weyerhaeuser Company, Moncure, NC
SAMPLING LOCATION: MDF Cyclone Outlet (WEYCO I.D. DB)
OCOJ3
MDFCO-MOIBO-li MDPCO-M003Q-lb MDPCO-M0030-lc
Theu
Y
Pbar
Vm
On
Vm(std)
Pwt
Mg
jig/dscn
ppbvd
kg/hr
Ib/hr
Test Dale
Run Start Tune
Run Finish Time
Net Run Time, Minutes
Dry Gas Meter Calibration Facto;
Baromet: *re, mmHg
Volume of Metered Gas Sample, DAL
Dry Gas Meter Temperature, Degree* C
Volume of Metered Gas Sample, Dry SL*
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM*
EMISSION RESULTS:
B-Hnene
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, mkrognms
jig per dry std. cubic meter*
pam per billion by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
A—Finene
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
jig per dry ttd. cubic meter*
parts per billion by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
Methylene Chloride
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Caleb Weight, micrognms
jig per dry ltd. cubic meter*
puts per billion by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
Trichlorofluoromethane
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
jig per dry ltd. cubic meter*
pounds per hour
Chloromethane
jig per dry ttd. cubic meter*
puts per billion by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
... pounds per now
n— Hexane
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
jig per dry std. cubic meter*
parts per billion by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
9/26/92
1135
1155
20
0.9963
761
9X35
IAS,
9.659
92,617
9/26V92
1218
1238
20
0.9963
761
6.64
27.8
6.456
92,617
9/26/92
1355
1415
20
0.9963
761
7.95
32.5
7.610
92,617
13624
1.11
115
203
0.0181
0.0399
13624
1.18
122
21.6
0.0192
0.0424
84.93
1.00
1035
293
0.0163
0.0359
13737
0.13
135
'""'2 - -au .
-0.00212
0.00467
50.49
026 ?
26.9
08
0.00424
0.00934
86.17
0.06
62
1.73
0.000978
0.00216
13624
1.01
156
27.6
0.0246
0.0543
13624
1.09
169
29.8
0.0266
0.0586
84193
033
51.1
145
0.00804
0.0177
13737
1.41
218
;-;s 382
0.0344
0.0758
50.49
027
.; 41.8
19.9
0.00658
0.0145
86.17
1.09
169
47.1
0.0266
0.0586
13624
0.91
120
21.1
0.0188
0.0415
13624
0.80
105
18.6
0.0165
0.0365
84.93
037
48.6
13.8
0.00765
0.0169
13737
0.11
145
253
0.00227
0.00501
50.49
0.4j
565
26.9
0.00889
0.0196
86.17
0.09
11.8
330
0.00186
0.00410
N/A
N/A
67.8
192
0.0107
0.0235
N/A
N/A
82.1
14.4
0.0129
0.0285
N/A
N/A
41.7
19.9
0.00657
0.0145
N/A
N/A
623
17.4
0.00980
0.0216
' 68 Deg. F (20 C) — 29.92 In. Mercury
(continued next page)
-------
VOLATILE ORGANIC TEST RESULTS
OC01
MDFCO-M0030-la MDFCO-M0030-lb MDPCQ-M0030-lc
Acetone
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-moie
Catch Weight, mkrognms
Hg per dry ltd. cubic meter'
parts per billion by volume. Dry
Itilognmi per hour
pounds per hour
Isooctane
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch w^»ht, micrognms
MR PC? *i*y *•**• cubic meter*
parts per billion by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
P-Cymene
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrognms
/ig per dry ltd. cubic meter*
parts per billion by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
Toluene
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Caleb Weight, microgrami
/ig per dry ltd. cubic meter*
parts per billion by volume. Dry
kilogram* per hour
pounds per hour
2— Butanone
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, microgramc
jig per dry std. cubic meter*
pans per billion by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
1.1.1 -Trichloroethane
Formula Weight, lb/H>-mole
Catch Weight, micrognms
jig per dry std. cubic meter*
parts per billion by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
Chloroform
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Caleb Weight, micrognms
ujognni. per aour
pounds per hour
. ;,.T iVeight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrognms
/tg per dry std. cubic meter*
parts per billion by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
m— /p—Xyiene
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrognms
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
paru per billion by volume. Dry
kilognms per hour
pounds per hour
* 68 Deg. F (20 C) — 29.92 In. Mercury
Estimated results or not detectable (underlined)
58.08
0.18
18.6
7.72
0.00293
0.00647
11423
OJ04
4.14
0.872
(X000652
0.00144
13422
003
3.11
fQSST
0.000489
0.00108
92.15.
0.05
5.18
135
0.000815
0.00180
72.1
0.03
. 3.11
1.04
0.000489
0.00108
133.41
0.02
2.07
O573
O000326
OOOQ718
11938
0.0025
0259
0.0522
0.0000407
0X1000898
104.15
0.01
IM
0239
0.000163
0.000359
106.16
0.01
1.04
0235
0.000163
0.000359
58.08
029
44.9
18.6
0.00707
0.0156
11423
0.47:
72*
153
0.0115
0.0253
13422
0.03
4.65
OX33
0.000731
aooiei
92.15
0.06
929
•2.43
0.001462
0.00322
. 7Z1
ft04:
620:
107
0.000975
OJXE15
133.41
O03:
4J6S
OJS3S
0.000731
0.001612
11938
0.0025
0387
0.0780
0X000609
0.000134
10W.5
aoi
US:
0358
0.000244
0.000537
106.16
0.01
145
0351
0X100244
0.000537
58.08
0.19
25.0
103
0.00393
0.00866
11423
: 0:04
•..,,.- -526
0.000827
OJ00182
13422
0.03
3J94
0.000620
92.15
0.02
Z63
0.686
a000414
0.000912
72.1
163
O.S77
0.000414
0.000912
133.41
OAl
131
0237
0.000207
0.000456
11938
00025
0329
0.0662
0.0000517
o:oooiu
104.15
0.01
0304
_OJXH207
0.000456
106.16
0.01
131
0298
OJXXam
O000456
N/A
N/A
29J
122
0.00464
0.0102
N/A
KM
27.4
5.77
0.00431
0.00951
N/A
N/A
3.90
0.699
0.000613
0.00135
N/A
N/A
5.70
1.49
0.000897
0.00198
N/A
N/A
3.98
133
0.000626
0.00138
N/A
N/A
Z68
0.483
0.000421
0.000929
N/A
N/A
0325
0.0655
0.0000511
0.000113
"N/A
130
0300
0.000204
0.000451
N/A
N/A
130
0294
0.000204
0.000451
(continued next page)
-------
VOLATILE ORGANIC TEST RESULTS
OGG15
MDFCO-M0030-11 MDFCO-M0030-lb MDPCO-M0030-lc
Bromomethane
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
/ig per dry std. cubic meter*
pans per billion by volume. Dry
kilogram* per hour
pounds per hour
Cumene (Uopropyi benzene)
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
jig per dry ltd. cubic meter*
parts per billion by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
Carton Bisulfide
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
/ig per dry std. cubic meter*
pans per billion by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
Ethyl benzene
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
fig per dry std. cubic meter*
pare per billion by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
Bromodichloromethane
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
parts per billion by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
Tetrachloroetbene
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
Hg per dry std. cubic meter*
pans per billion by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
o-Xylene
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
/ig per dry std. cubic meter*
para per billion by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
94.95
0.02
2.07
O52S
0.000326
O00071S
12021
0.0]
• 144
0207
0.000163
0.000359
76.14
0.0025
0259
0.0818
04000407
04000898
106.17
0.0025
0259
04586
0.0000407
0.0000898
163.8
O002S
0259
0.0380
0.0000407
0.0000898
165.83
0.0025
0259
0.0375
04000407
0.0000898
106.16
0.0025
0259
0.0586
04000407
04000898
94.95
0.01
1.55
0392
0400244
0400537
12021
041
135
0310
0.000244
0.000537
76.14
0.0025
0387
0.122
0.0000609
0.000134
106.17
0.0025
0387
0.0877
0.0000609
0.000134
163.8
0.002S
0387
0.0569
0.0000609
0400134
165.83
0.0025
0387
0.0562
04000609
0.000134
106.16
0.0025
0387
0.0877
0.0000609
0.0001343
94.95
041
131
0333
::0400207
0.000456
12021
0.01
131
0263
0.000207
0.000456
76.14
0.0025
njy
0.104
0.0000517
0400114
106.17
0.0025
0329
0.0744
0.0000517
0400114
163.8
0.0025
0329
0.0482
04000517
0400114
f-
165.83
0.0025
0329
0.0477
0.0000517
0.000114
106.16
04025
0329
04744
0.0000517
0.0001140
N/A
N/A
1.64
0.417
0.000259
0.000571
N/A
N/A
130
0260
0.000204
0.000451
N/A
N/A
0325
0.103
0.0000511
0.000113
N/A
N/A
0325
0.0736
0.0000511
0.000113
N/A
N/A
0325
0.0477
0.0000511
0.000113
N/A
N/A
0325
0.0471
0.0000511
0.000113
N/A
N/A
0325
0.0736
0.0000511
0.000113
* 68 Deg. F (20 C) — 29.92 In. Mercury
Estimated results or not detectable (underlined)
-------
VOLATILE ORGANIC TEST RESULTS
coo,
PLANT: Weyerhaeuser Company, Moncure, NC
SAMPLING LOCATION: MDF Cyclone Outlet (WEYCO I.D. DB)
MDFCO-M0030-2b MDPCO-M0030-2c MDFCO-M0030-2d
Theu
Y
Pbar
Vm
on
Vm(std)
Qsd
Fwt
ppbvd
kg/hr
Ib/hr
Test Date
Run Suit Time
Run Finish Time
Net Run Time, Minutes
Diy Gas Meter Calibration Factor
Barometric Pressure, mm Hg
Volume of Metered Gas Sample, DAL
Dry Gas Meter Tern perature. Degrees C
Volume of Metered Gas Sample, Dry SL*
Volumetric Air Flow Rate. Dry SCFM*
EMISSION RESULTS:
B-Finene
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, microgrami
Hg per dry ltd. cubic meter*
ppb by volume, Dry
kilogram! per hour
pounds per hour
A-Rnene
• Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
Hg per dry ltd. cubic meter*
ppb by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
Methytene Chloride
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, microgrami
fig per dry ltd. cubic meter*
ppb by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
Trichlorofluoromethane
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Caleb Weight, micrograms
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
Chloromethane
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
pg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
n—Hexane
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppb by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
, pounds per hour
* 68 Deg. F (20 C) — 29.92 In. Mercury
Estimated results or not detectable (underlined)
9/26/92
1625
1645
20
0.9963
761
9.97
32.0
9.559
88305
9/26/92
1725
1745
20
.0.9963
-761
1031
29.8
9.959
88305
9/26/92
1752
1812
20
0.9963
761
10.71
27.5
10.422
88305
13624
1.40
146
25.9
0.0220
0.048445
13624
1.45
151.7
26.8
0.0228
0.050175
84.93
0.15
15.7
4.44
0.00235
0.00519
13737
0.03
3.14
O550
0.000471
0.001038
50.49
037-
38.7
18.4
0.00581
0.0128
86.17
0.02
2.09
0384
0.000314
0.000692
13624
1.83
184
32.4
0.0276
0.060785
13624
1.73
173.7
38.7
0.0261
0.057463
84.93
0.17
17.1
4.83
0.00256
0.00565
13737
0.12
12.0
2.11
0.00181
0.003986
50.49
034
542
2J.8
0.00814
0.0179
86.17
0.12
12.0
336
0.00181
0.003986
13624
1.75
168
29.6
0.0252
0.055541
13624
2.00
191.9
33.9
0.0288
0.063475
84.93
0.09
8.63
Z45
0.00130
0.00286
13737
0.02
2-09
0366
OJXM314
0.000692
50.49
032
30.7
14.6
0.00461
0.0102
86.17
0X11
0.96
0268
0.000144
0.000317
Average
N/A
N/A
166.0
293
0.0249
0.0549
N/A
N/A
172.4
30.4
0.0259
0.0570
N/A
N/A
13.8
3.91
0.00207
0.00456
N/A
N/A
5.76
1.01
0.000864
0.00191
N/A
N/A
412
19.6
0.00618
0.0136
N/A
N/A
5.03
1.41
0.000755
0.00167
(continued next page)
-------
VOLATILE ORGANIC TEST RESULTS
00017
MDFCO-M0030-2b MDFCO-M0030-2c MDFCO-M003Q-2d
Acetone
Fonnuli Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrognms
fig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
poundi per hour
Isooctane
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
pg per dry ltd. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
P-Cymene
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
jig per dry «td. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
Toluene
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, microgrami
fLg pet dry ltd. cubic meter*
ppb by volume, Diy
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
2—Butanone
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
, , Catch Weight, micrograms
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
1,1,1 — Trichloroethane
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
dicta Weight, micrognms
>ig per dry cut. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
Chloroform
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
/ig per dry ctd. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
Stymie
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
jig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppb by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
m—/p—Xylene
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, microgrami
/ig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppb by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
• 68 Deg. F (20 C) — 29.92 In. Mercury
Estimated results or not detectable (underlined)
58.08
027
282
11.7
0.00424
0.00934
11423
0.01
1.0S
0220
O000157
0.000346
13422
0.04
4.18
0.750
0.000628
0.001384
92.15
0.03
3.14
0.819
0.000471
0.001038
72.1
0.02
209
0.698
0.000314
0.000692
133.41
0.02
2,09
0377
O000314
0.000692
11938
0.0025
0240 "
0.0483
0.0000360
0.0000793
104.15
0.01
UK
0242
0.000157
0.000346
106.16
0.01
1.05
0237
0.000157
0.000346
58.08
025
25.1
10.4
0.00377
0.00830
11423
0.05
5.02
1.06
0.000753
0.001661
13422
0.05
5.02
0.900
0.000753
0.001661
92.15
0.03
3.01
0.786
0.000452
0.000996
72.1
0.02
201
0.670
0.000301
0.000664
133.41
0.02
201
0362-
0.000301
0.000664
11938
o.ores
0240
0.0483
0.0000360
0.0000793
104.15
0,01
1.00
0232
0,000151
0.000332
106.16
0.01
1.00
0228
0.000151
OJ000332
58.08
025
24.0
9.93
0.00360
0.00793
11423
0.01
0.96
0202
0.000144
0.000317
13422
0.04
4.18
0.750
0.000628
OJ01384
92.15
0.02
152
0.501
O0002SS
0000635
72.1
0.02
192.
0.640
0.000288
0.000635
133.41
0X11
0.96
0.173
0.000144
0.000317
11938
0.0025
0240
0.0483
0.0000360
0.0000793
10415
0.01
tt959
0222
0000144
0.000317
106.16
0.01
0.959
0217
{1000144
0.000317
N/A
N/A
25.8
10.7
0.00387
0.00853
N/A
N/A
234
0.493
0.000351
0.000775
N/A
N/A
4.46
0.800
0.000670
0.00148
N/A
N/A
2.69
0.702
0.000404
0.000890
N/A
N/A
201
0.669
0.000301
0.000664
N/A
N/A
1.69
0304
0.000253
0.000558
N/A
N/A
0240
0.0483
0.0000360
0.0000793
N/A
N/A
1.00
0232
0.000151
0.000332
N/A
N/A
1.00
0227
0.000151
0.000332
(continued next page)
-------
GOOi;
VOLATILE ORGANIC TEST RESULTS
MDFCO-M0030-2b MPFCO-M0030-2c MDFCO-M0030-2d
Bromomelbane
Formula Weight, IMb-mole 94.95 94.95 94.95 N/A
Catch Weight, micrograms 0.02 0-01 0-0025 N/A
HI perdry«ld. cubic meter* Z09 LOO 0240 1.1]
ppb by volume. Dry 0330 025* 0.061 0282
kilograms per hour 0.000314 OJOOOISI OJOOfXOiO 0.000167
pounds per hour OH00692 0^00332 0^000793 0.000368
Cuoene (Uopropyl benzene)
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mde 12021 12021 12021 N/A
Catch Weight, micrograms 0.01 OOi OJXE5 N/A
Mg per dry std. cubic meter- ** 1.05 1J» 0240 1.03
ppb by volume. Dry 0209 0201 0.048 —---. 0205
kilogrami per hour O000157 .0.000151"". 0.0000360 0.000115
pounds per hour 0000346 0.000332 0.0000793 0.000253
• 68 Deg. F (20 C) 29.92 In. Mercury
Estimated results or nol detectable (underlined)
-------
VOLATILE ORGANIC TEST RESULTS
PLANT: Weyerhaeuser Company, Moncure, NC
SAMPLING LOCATION: MDF Cyclone Outlet (WEYCO I.D. DB)
COO
MDFCO-M0030-3a MDPCO-M0030-3b MDPCO-M0030-3c
Thela
Y
Pbar
Vm
On
Vm(itd)
CM
Fwt
ppbvd
kgfcr
Ib/hr
Tat Dale
Ruo Start Tune
RUB Finish Tune
Net Run Time, Minute*
Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor ,
Barometric Pressure, mm Hg
Volume of Metered Gaa Sample, DAL
Dry Ga» Meter Tern perature. Degrees C
Volume of Metered Gas Sample, Dry SL*
Volumetric Air How Rate, Dry SCFM*
EMISSION RESULTS:
B-Pinene
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrognms
Hg per dry ltd. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
A-Pinene
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
/ig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
Methyleoe Chloride
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, microgrami
jig per dry ltd. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
Trichlorofluoromethane
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Caleb Weight, micrograms
Hg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
- tdlograms per hour
pounds per hour
Chloromethane
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catct Weight, micrognms
fig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
n—Heune
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrognms
/ig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour •
9/27/92
95S
1015
20
0.9963
759
11.79
30.0
11360
85351
9/27/92
1030
1050
20
0.9963
759
1023
313
9.808
85351
9/27/92
1105
1125
, 20
0.9963
759
10.44
318
9.969
85351
13624
114
188
333
0.0273
0.0602
13624
119
193
34.0
0.0280
0.0616
84.93
4.03
354.7
100.5
0.0514
0.113
13737
0.07
6.16
1.08
0.000894
0.00197
50.49
0.08 -™»
7.04
336
0.00102
0.00225
86.17
0.07
6.16
1.72
0.000894
0.001970
13624
1.63
166
293
O.G241
0.0531
13624
121
123
21.8
0.0179
0.0394
84.93
025
25.5
722
0.00370
0.00815
13737
1.16
1183
20.7
0.0172
0.0378
50.49
w& 024
243
11.7
0.00355
0.00782
86.17
0.75
763
213
0.0111
0.024448
13624
0.84
S43
14.9
0.0122
0.0269
13624
0.82
823
143
0.0119
0.0263
84.93
0.14
14.0
3.98
0.00204
0.00449
13737
0.10
10.0
1.76
0.00145
0.00321
50.49
— 032
32.1
153
0.00466
0.0103
86.17
0.07
7.02
1.96
0.00102
0.002245
N/A
N/A
212
10.1
0.00308
0.00678
N/A
N/A
29.9
834
0.00433
0.00955
'« Deg. F (20 C) — 7°W In. Mercury
(continued nan page)
-------
VOLATILE ORGANIC TEST RESULTS
MDPCO-M0030-3a MDPCO-M0030-3b MDFCO-M0030-3c
VJ L
Acetone
Formula Weight, IMb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
/ig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppb by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
Isooctane
FormuU Weight, IMb-mole
Calck Weight, Bictograms
- ^I'per dry ltd. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
P-Cymene
Formula Weight, IMb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
Toluene
Formula Weight, IMb-mole
Caich Weight, micrograms
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
2—Butanone
Formula Weight, 1Mb—mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
Mg per dry ctd. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
1,1,1 — Trichloroethane
Formula Weight, 1Mb—mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppb by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
Chloroform
Formula Weight, IMb-moJe
Catch Weight, micrograms
jug per dry std. cubic meter*
ppb by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
Styrene
Formula Weight, IMb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
/tg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
m—/p—Xylene
Formula Weight, IMb-mole
Catch Weight, micrognms
/ig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppb by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
* 68 Deg. F (20 C) — 29.92 In. Mercury
Estimated results or not delectable (underlined)
58.08
032
282
11.7
0.00409
0.00901
11423
0.04
3.52
0.742 -«*
0.000511
0.001126
13422
0.05
4.40
0.789
0.000638
0.001407
92.15
OJE
TUTS
4460
0.000255
0,000563
7Z1
0.03
Z64
0.881
0.000383
0.000844
133.41
0.03
2.64
0.476
0.000383
0.000844
11938
0.17
15.0
3.02
0.00217
0.00478
104.15
0.01
0.88
0203
0.000128
0.000281
106.16
001
0^80
0.199
0.000128
0.000281
58.08
021
21.4
8JT7
0.00311
0.00685
11423
033
33.6
7.09
0.00488
0.010757
13422
0.04
4.08
0.731
0,000591
0.001304
92.15
0.03
3.06
0.798
0.000444
0.000978
72.1
0.01
1.02
0340
0.000148
, 0.800326,
133.41
0.02
2.04
0368
O000296
O000652
11938
0.0025
0255
0.0514
0.0000370
0.0000815
— . 104.15
om
1.02
0235
0.000148
0.000326
106.16
0.01
1.02
0231
0.000148
0.000326
58.08
023
23.1
936
0.00335
0.00738
11423
404
•" -v;-;:": ;^;;;4or
OJ4S
0.000582
0.001283
13422
0,03
3.01
0339
0.000436
0.000962
92.15
0.03
3:01
0.786
0.000436
, 0.000962
72.1
0.02
Z01
0.669
0.000291
0X100641
133.41
0.01
LOO
0.181
0.000145
0.000321
11938
0.0025
0251
0.050S
0.0000364
0.0000802
104.15
aoi
1.00
0232
0.000145
0.000321
106.16
OiOl
1.00
0227
0.000145
0.000321
N/A
N/A
242
10.0
0.00351
0.00774
N/A
N/A
13.7
2JS9
0.00199
0.00439
N/A
N/A
3.83
0.686
0.000555
0.00122
N/A
N/A
2.61
0.681
0.000378
0.000834
N/A
N/A
1.89
0.630
0.000274
0.000604
N/A
N/A
1.89
0342
0.000275
0.000606
N/A
N/A
5.16
1.04
0.000748
0.00165
N/A
N/A
0.968
0223
0.000140
0.000309
N/A
N/A
0.968
0219
0.000140
0.000309
(continued next page)
-------
VOLATILE ORGANIC TEST RESULTS
MDFCO-M0030-3a MDPCO-M0030-3b MDPCO-M0030-3c
Cumene (isopropyl benzene)
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micragnmi
lif per dry tld. cubic meter*
ppb by volume, Dry
kilogram per hour
poiuufe per hour
Cuton DuulGde
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Caleb Weight, microgranu
/*g per dry std. cubic meter'
c ppb by volume. Dry
kilogrami per hour
poundi per hour
Bromodichloromethane
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, microgrami
Hg per dry
-------
APPENDIX A-2
MDF PRESS STACK 2 (WIW-2)
-------
ALDEHYDES/KETONES TEST RESULTS
PLANT: Weyerhaeuser Company, Moncure, NC
SAMPLING LOCATION: MDF Press Stack 2 (WIW-2)
Test Date
Run Start & Finish Times
Net Traversing Points
Net Run Time, Minutes
Nozzle Diameter, Inches
PitotTube Coefficient
Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor
Barometric Pressure, Inches Hg
- f!
0 '* 3
\J u. v*
Theta
Dia
Cp
Y
Pbar
Delta H
Vm
tm
Vm(std)
Vic
Vw
%H20
Mfd
%C02
%02
%CO + N2
Md
Ms
Pg
Ps
is
Delta-P
vs
A
Qsd
Qaw
Avg. Pressure Differential of
Orifice Meter, Inches H2O
j
Volume of Metered Gas Sample, Dry ACF
Dry Gas Meter Temperature, Degrees F
Volume of Metered Gas Sample, Dry SCF*
Total Volume of Liquid Collected
in Impingers & Silica Gel, mL
Volume of Water Vapor, SCF*
Moisture Content, Percent by Volume
Dry Mole Fraction
Carbon Dioxide, Percent by Volume, Dry
Oxygen, Percent by Volume, Dry
CO + N2, Percent by Volume, Dry
Gas Molecular Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole, Dry
Gas Molecular Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole, Wet
Flue Gas Static Pressure, Inches H2O
Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, Inches Hg
Flue Gas Temperature, Degrees F
Average Velocity Head, Inches H2O
Flue Gas Velocity, Feet per Second
Stack/Duct Area, Square Inches
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM*
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Wet ACFM
IsokinetiaSampling Rate, Percent
MDFP2-M0011-1
9-11-92
1928-2050
24
72
0.200
0.84
1.005
30.020
1.100
40.968
99
39.080
38.9
1.831
4.5
0.955
0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
28.35
0.45
30.05
118
0.6172
46.46
661
11,207
12,787
101,8--
MDFP2-M0011-2
9-12-92
848-1021
24
84
0.200
0.84
1.005
30.060
1.057
45.997
82
45.344
21.8
1.026
2.2
0.978
0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
28.60
0.45
30.09
111
0.6109
45.73
661
11,444
12,586
99.2
MDFP2-M0011-3
9-12-92
1211-1427
24
84
0.200
0.84
1.005
30.060
1.129
48.005
97
46.027
19.9
0.937
2.0
0.980
0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
28.62
0.45
30.09
115
0.6301
46.56
661
11,604
12,814
99.3
* 68 Deg. F (20 C) - - 29.92 In. Mercury
(continued next page)
-------
EMISSION RESULTS:
FORMALDEHYDE
Fwt Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
>ig Catch Weight, micrograms
ng/dscm tig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppmvd ppm by volume, Dry
kg/hr kilograms per hour
Ib/hr pounds per hour
ACETALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, 1Mb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
jug per dry std. cubic meter'
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ACROLEIN
Formula Weight, Ib/lb—mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
/ig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ACETONE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry j
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
PROPIONALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
/ig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
CROTONALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb—mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
/ag per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
n-BUTYRALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
/zg per drysid. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
/ig per dry std. cubic metec*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
MDPP2-M0011-1
30
61,419
55,495
44.5
1.057
2330
44.1
785
709
03869
0.0135
0.0298
56.1
88
79.5
0.03410
0.00151
0.00334
58
232
210
0.08694
0.00399
0.00880
58.1
56
50.6
0.02095
0.000964
0.00212
70
61
55.1
0.01894
0.001050
0.00231
72.1
157
142
0.04733
0.00270
0.005%
72.1
" --,433™*
93.1
0.03105
0.00177
0.00391
MDPP2-M0011-2
30
60420
47,129
37.8
0.916
2.020
44.1
483
376
0.2052
0.00731
0.0161
56.1
46
35.8
0.01536
0.00070
0.00154
58
336
262
0.10852
0.00509
0.01122
MDFP2-M0011-3
0.000645
0.0000303
aOQOQ668
70
161
125
0.04309
0.00244
0.00537
72.1
267
208
0.06937
0.00404
0.00891
72.1
31
24.1
0.00805
0.000469
0.00103
Estimated catch weight.
All catch weight! are leaa than the minimum detection limit (M DL). Value pencilled calculated uaing 1/2 M DL for each catch weight.
• 68 Deg. F (20 C) - - 29.92 In. Mercury (continued next pvge)
-------
025
MDPP2-MOOI1-1 MDFP2-M0011-2
MDFP2-M0011-3
EMISSION RESULTS:
BENZALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole 106.1 106.1
Catch Weight, micrograms 34 38
/ig per dry std. cubic meter* 30.7 29.6
ppm by volume, Dry 0.00697 0.00671
kilograms per hour 0.000585 0.000575
pounds per hour 0.00129 - 0.00127
ISOVALERALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole 86.1 86.1
Catch Weight, micrograms 81 167
^ pg per dry std. cubic meter* 732 130 ®i"
ppm by volume, Dry 0.02045 0.03634
kilograms per hour 0.00139 0.00253
pounds per hour 0.00307 0.00558
VALERALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole 86.1 86.1
Catch Weight, micrograms 91 212
Ag per dry std. cubic meter* 822 165
ppm by volume, Dry 0.02297 0.04613
kilograms per hour 0.00157 0.00321
pounds per hour 0.00345 0.00708
o-TOLUALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole 1202 1202
Catch Weight, micrograms- 33- 18
- jig per dry std. cubic meter* 29.8 14.0
j - ppm by volume, Dry 0.00597 0.00281
kilograms per hour 0.000568 0.000273
pounds per hour 0.00125 0.000601
m/p-TOLUALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole 1202 1202
Catch Weight, micrograms 63 236
/tg per dry std. cubic meter* 56.9 184
ppm by volume, Dry 0.01139 - 0.03678
kilograms per hour 0.00108 0.00357
pounds per hour 0.00239 0.00788
HEXALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole 100.16 100.16-
Catch Weight, micrograms 142 131
>ig per dry std. cubic meter* 128 102
ppm by volume, Dry 0.03082 0.02450
kilograms per hour 0.00244 0.00198
pounds per hour 0.00539 0.00437
^-DIMETHYL BENZALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole 134 134
Catch Weight, micrograms 42 264 ^ _
H% per dry std. cubic meter* 37.9 206
ppm by volume, Dry 0.00681 0.03691
kilograms per hour 0.000723 0.00400
pounds per hour 0.00159 0.00881
Estimated catcta weight.
All catco weigbu are leaatbantbe minimum detection limit (MDL). Value praented calculated ining 1/2 M DL for each calcta weight.
•MDeg.P(20C) — 29.92 In. Mereury
-------
PM10 & CONDENSIBLE PARTICULATE TEST RESULTS
02f
PLANT: Weyerhaeuser Company, Moncure, NC
SAMPLING LOCATION: MDF Press Stack 2 (WEYCO LD. W.LW.2)
Test Date
Run Start & Finish Times
Net Traversing Points
Net Run Time, Minutes
Nozzle Diameter, Inches
Pilot Tube Coefficient
Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor
Barometric Pressure, Inches Hg
Theta
Dia
Cp.
Y
Pbar
Delta H
Vm
tm
Vm(std)
Vic
Vw
%H20
Mfd
%CO2
%O2
%CO + N2
Md
Ms
Pg
^r.—
ts
Delta-P
vs
A
Qsd
Qaw
AVJL Pressure Differential of
Orifice Meter, Inches H2O
Volume of Metered Gas Sample, Dry ACF
Dry Gas Meter Temperature, Degrees F
Volume of Metered Gas Sample, Dry SCF*
Total Volume of Liquid Collected
in Impingers & Silica Gel, mL
Volume of Water Vapor, SCF*
Moisture Content, Percent by Volume
Dry Mole Fraction
Carbon Dioxide, Percent by Volume, Dry
Oxygen, Percent by Volume, Dry
CO + N2, Percent by Volume, Dry
Gas Molecular Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole, Dry
Gas Molecular Weight,Lb/Lb-Mole, Wet
Flue Gas Static Pressure, Inches H2O
Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, Inches Hg
Flue Gas Temperature, Degrees F
Average Velocity Head, Inches H2O
Flue Gas Velocity, Feet per Second
Stack/Duct Area, Square Inches
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM*
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Wet ACFM
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, Percent
MDFP2-M201A/202-1 MDFP2-M201A/202-2 MDFP2-M201A/202-3
9/10/92
1148-1739
-.sfe^s^"1 j2
261.75
0.175
0.84
1.005
- 30.09
0.7
123.71
108
116.411
87
4.095
3.4
0.966
0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
28.47
0.42
30.12
123
0.6513
47.77
661
11,586
13,147
105.4
9/11/92
740-1145
12
232,00
0.175
0.84
1.005
30.02
0.67
105.39
93
101.570
73
3.436
3.3
0.967
0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
28.48
0.42
30.05
114
0.5992
45.51
661
11,203
12,533
107.4
9/11/92
1253-1821
12
253.00
0.175
0.84
1.005
30.02
0.67
116.332
108
109.198
73
3.436
3.1
0.969
0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
28.50
- 0.42
30.05
121
0.6632
48.19
661
11,729
13,272
101.1
* 68 Degrees F — 29.92 Inches of Mercury (Hg). (Continued Next Page)
-------
G27
PM10 & CONDENSIBLE PARTICULATE TEST RESULTS
MDFP2-M20W202-1 MDFP2-M20LA/202-2 MDFP2-M201A/202-3
PM10 RESULTS:
ucyc Stack Gas Viscosity
Qs PM10 Flow, at Cyclone Conditions, ACFM
D50 Dia. of Particles in Cyclone, Microns
Particulate Catch.
mg < PM10, Grams
> PM10, Grams
Non-extractable Condensibles, Grams
Extractable Condensibles, Grams
PM10 Emissions:
Including extractable/non-extractable condensibles
gr/DSCF Concentration, grains/DSCF*
kg/hr Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Ib/nr Emission Rate, pounds/hour
Including only non - extractable condensibles
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
Without condensibles
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
Total Particulate Emissions (Includes PM10):
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/nour -~~~—— PM10 > PM10, %
%
-------
APPENDIX A-3
MDF PRESS STACK 3 (WIW-1)
-------
ALDEHYDES/KETONES TEST RESULTS
PLANT: Weyerhaeuser Company, Moncure, NC
SAMPLING LOCATION: MDF Press Stack 3 (WIW-1)
Test Date
Run Start & Finish Times
Net Traversing Points
Net Run Time, Minutes
Nozzle Diameter, Inches
Pilot Tube Coefficient
Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor
Barometric Pressure, Inches Hg
Theta
Dia
Cp
Y
Pbar
Delta H
Vm
tm
Vm(std)
Vic
Vw
%H20
Mfd
%C02
%02
%CO+N2
Md
Ms
Pg
Ps -^*
ts
Delta-P
vs
A
Qsd
Qaw
Avg. Pressure Differential of
Orifice Meter, Inches H2O
Volume of Metered Gas Sample, Dry ACF
Dry Gas Meter Temperature, Degrees F
Volume of Metered Gas Sample, Dry SCF*
Total Volume of Liquid Collected
in Impingers & Silica Gel, mL
Volume of Water Vapor, SCF*
Moisture Content, Percent by Volume
Dry Mole Fraction
Carbon Dioxide, Percent by Volume, Dry
Oxygen, Percent by Volume, Dry
CO + N2, Percent by Volume, Dry
Gas Molecular Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole, Dry
Gas Molecular Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole, Wet
"*
Flue Gas Static Pressure, Inches H2O -
Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, Inches Hg
Flue Gas Temperature, Degrees F
Average Velocity Head, Inches H2O
Flue Gas Velocity, Feet per Second
Stack/Duct Area, Square Inches
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM*
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Wet ACFM
Isokinetic Sampling Rate,. Percent
MDFP3-M0011-1
9-11-92
1928-2050
24
72
0.201
0.84
1.006
30.020
1.457
45.987
95
44.324
32.1
1.511
3.3
0.967
0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
28.48
0.2
30.03
120
0.7423
50.96
661
12,386
14,025
103.5
MDFP3-M0011-2
9-12-92
0848-1009
~* *"~* ...._,-— 24-
72
0.201
0.84
1.006
30.060
1.355
44.915
82
44.366
29.1
1.370
3.0
0.970
0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
28.51
0.2
30.07
114
0.6966
49.04
661
12,106
13,497
106.0
MDFP3-M0011-3
9-12-92
1211-1410
24
72
0.201
0.84
1.006
30.060
1.487
46.308
96
44.571
27.6
1.299
2.8
0.972
0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
28.54
0.2
30.07
119
0.7561
51.27
661
12,579
14,111
102.4
* 68 Deg. F (20 C) - - 29.92 In. Mercury
(continued next page)
-------
ALDEHYDES/KETONES TEST RESULTS
EMISSION RESULTS:
FORMALDEHYDE
Fwt Formula Weight, Ib/lb—mole
ng Catch Weight, micrograms
jig/dscm /Ag per dry std. cubic meter"
ppmvd ppm by volume, Dry
kg/hr kilograms per hour
Ib/hr pounds per hour
ACETALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
jig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ACROLEIN
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
Hg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ACETONE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb —mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
fj.g per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
PROPIONALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb—mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
/ig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
CROTONALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
jig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
n-BUTYRALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb —mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
fj,g per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour - _ ,^,
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
jig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
MDFT3-M0011-1
30
80,176
63,872
51.217
-1344
2.96363
44.1
529
0.230
0.00887
0.01955
56.1
204
163
0.06969
_ 0.00342
0.00754
' 58
138
110
0.04560
0.00231
0.00510
58.1
23
18.3
0.00759
0.000386
0.000850
70
55.
43.8
0.01506
0.000922
0.00203
72.1
161
128
0.04279
0.00270
0.00595
72.1
183
146
0.04864
0.00307
0.00676
MDFP3-M0011-2
30
90,935
72,375
58.035
1.489
3.28223
44.1
625
"» 497
0.271
0.01023
0.02256
56.1
177
141
0.06041
0.00290
0.00639
58
351
279
0.11587
0.00575
0.01267
58.1
107
85.2
0.03526
0.00175
0.00386
70
49
39.0
0.01340
0.000802
0.00177
72.1
101
80.4
0.02682
0.00165
0.00365
72.1
59
47.0
0.01567
0.000966
0.00213
MDFP3-M0011-3
30
77,086
61,070
48.971
1.305
2.87778
44.1
713
565
0.308
0.01207
0.02662
56.1
105
83.2
0.03567
0.00178
0.00392
58
111
87.9
0.03647
0.00188
0.00414
58.1
42
33.3
0.01378
0.000711
0.00157
70
59
46.7
0.01606
0.00100
0.00220
72.1
133
105
0.03516
0.00225
0.00497
72.1
50
39.6
0.01322
0.000847
0.00187
• 6S Deg. F (20 C) — 29.92 In. Mercury
(continued next page)
!9-A»r-SJ
-------
03i
ALDEHYDES/KETONES TEST RESULTS
EMISSION RESULTS:
MDFT3-M0011-1 MDFP3-M0011-2 MDFP3-M0011-3
BENZALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-molc 106.1 106.1 106.1
Catch Weight, micrograms 23 35 32
jig per dry std. cubic meter* 22.3 27.9 25.4
ppm by volume. Dry 0.00506 0.00632 0.00575
kilograms per hour 0.000469 0.000573 0.000542
pounds per hour 0.00103 0.00126 0.00119
ISOVALERALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole 86.1 86.1 86.1
Catch Weight, micrograms 70 63 76
jug per dry std. cubic meter* -"-—*" 55.8 50.1 60.2
ppm by volume, Dry 0.01558 0.01401 0.01682
kilograms per hour 0.00117 0.00103 0.00129
pounds per hour 0.00259 0.00227 0.00284
VALERALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole 86.1 86.1 86.1
Catch Weight, micrograms 222 78 102
/ig per dry std. cubic meter* 177 62,1 80.8
ppm by volume. Dry 0.04941 0.01735 0.02258
kilograms per hour 0.00372 0.00128 0.00173
pounds per hour 0.00821 0.00282 0.00381
o-TOLUALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole 120.2 120.2 * 120.2
Catch Weight, micrograms 138 22 36
^ig per dry std. cubic meter* 110 17.5 28.5
ppm by volume. Dry 0.02200 0.00350 0.00571
kilograms per hour 0.00231 0.000360 0.000610
pounds per hour 0.00510 0.000794 0.00134
m/p-TOLUALDEHYDE
- Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole 120.2 120.2 120.2
Catch Weight, micrograms -112 50 75
Mg per dry std. cubic meter* 89.2 39.8 59.4
ppm by volume, Dry 0.01786 0.00796 0.01189
kilograms per hour 0.00188 0.000819 0.00127
pounds per hour 0.00414 0.00180 0.00280
HEXALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole 100.16 100.16 100.16
Catch Weight, micrograms 153 116 134
Hg per dry std. cubic meter* 122 9Z3 106
ppm by volume, Dry 0.02927 0.02217 0.02550
kilograms per hour 0.00257 0.00190 0.00227
pounds per hour 0.00566 0.00419 0.00500
2,5-DIMETHYL BENZALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole 134 134 134
Catch Weight, micrograms 245 29 48
/xg per dry std. cubic meter* 195 23.1 38.0
ppm by volume, Dry 0.03504 0.00414 0.00683
kilograms per hour 0.00411 0.000475 0.000813
«. -^pounds per hour 0.00906 0.00105 0.00179
' « Deg. F (20 C) — 29.92 In. Mercury
-------
PM10 & CONDENSIBLE PARTICULATE TEST RESULTS
0-
PLANT: Weyerhaeuser Company, Moncure, NC
SAMPLING LOCATION: MDF Press Stack 3 (WEYCO I.D. WIW-1)
MDFP3-M201A/2Q2-1 MDFP3-M201A/202-2 MDFP3-M201A/2(B-1
Test Date
Run Start & Finish Times
^ Nk^ Traversing Points
Theta Net Run Time, Minutes
Dia Nozzle Diameter, Inches
Cp Pitot Tube Coefficient
Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor'
Pbar Barometric Pressure, Inches Hg
Deka H AVJJ Pressure Differential of
Orifice Meter, Inches H2O
Vm Volume of Metered Gas Sample, Dry ACF
tm Dry Gas Meter Temperature, Degrees F
Vm(std) Volume of Metered Gas Sample, Dry SCF*
Vic Total Volume of Liquid Collected
in Impingers & Silica Gel, mL
Vw Volume of Water Vapor, SCF*
%H20 Moisture Content, Percent by Volume
Mfd Dry Mole Fraction
%CO2 Carbon Dioxide, Percent by Volume, Dry
%O2 Oxygen, Percent by Volume, Dry
%CO + N2 CO + N2, Percent by Volume, Dry
Md Gas Molecular Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole, Dry
Ms Gas Molecular Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole, Wet
Pg Flue Gas Static Pressure, Inches H2O
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, Inches Hg
ts Flue Gas Temperature, Degrees F
Delta-P Average Velocity Head, Inches H2O
vs Flue Gas Velocity, Feet per Second
A Stack/Duct Area, Square Inches
Qsd Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM*
Qaw Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Wet ACFM
%I Isokinetic Sampling Rate, Percent
9/10/92
1148-1742
12
259.75
0.181
0.84
1.006
30.09
0.75
123.248
109
115.788
101
4.754
3.9 '
0.961
0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
28.42
0.45
30.12
125
0.6986
49.6
661
11,935
13,661
96.0
9/11/92
739-1158
12 *,
249
0.181
0.84
1.006
30.02
0.73
115.284
96
110.621
112
5.272
4.5
0.955
0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
28.35
0.45
30.05
119
0.7512
51.3
661
12,362
14,128
92.3
9/11/92
1352-1803
12
238.5
0.181 '
0.84
1.006
30.02,
0.76
J ' 111-.52T
97
106.810
76
3.577
3.2
0.968
0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
28.49
0.45
30.05
— 123
0.7611
51.71
661
12,532
14,241
91.8
* 68 Degrees F — 29.92 Inches of Mercury (Hg). (Continued Next Page)
-------
PM10 & CONDENSIBLE PARTICULATE TEST RESULTS
MDFF3-M201A/202-1 MDFP3-M201A/202-2 MDFP3-M201A/202-3
PM10 RESULTS:
ucyc Stack Gas Viscosity
Qs PM10 Flow, at Cyclone Conditions, ACFM
D50 Dia. of Particles in Cyclone, Microns
ygs-," jgj$,z^tZ£3- *
Paniculate Catch.
tag < PMlQj Grams
> PM10, Grams
Non-extractable Condensibles, Grams
Extractable Condensibles, Grams
PM10 Emissions:
-<*
Including extractable/non- extractable Condensibles
gr/DSCF Concentration, grains/DSCF*
kg/hr Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Ib/br Emission Rate, pounds/hour
Including only non—extractable Condensibles
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
Witbout Condensibles
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
Total Paniculate Emissions (Includes PM10):
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
Paniculate Fractionation:
%>PM10 >PM10, %
%
-------
APPENDIX A-4
MDF PRESS STACK 4 (WIW-5)
-------
ALDEHYDES/KETONES TEST RESULTS
PLANT: Weyerhaeuser Company, Moncure, NC
SAMPLING LOCATION: MDF Press Stack 4 (WIW-5)
*"J5 MDFP4-M0011-1
Theta
Dia
Cp
Y
Pbar
Delta H
Vm
tm
Vm(std)
Vic
Vw
%H20
Mfd
%C02
%02
%CO+N2
Md
Ms
Pg
Ps
ts
Delta -P
vs
A
Qsd
Qaw
%I
* 68 Deg. F
Test Date
Run Start & Finish Times
Net Traversing Points
Net Run Time, Minutes
Nozzle Diameter, Inches
Pilot Tube Coefficient
Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor
Barometric Pressure, Inches Hg
Avg. Pressure Differential of
Orifice Meter, Inches H2O
Volume of Metered Gas Sample, Dry ACF
Dry Gas Meter Temperature, Degrees F
Volume of Metered Gas Sample, Dry SCF*
Total Volume of Liquid Collected
in Impingers & Silica Gel, mL
Volume of Water Vapor, SCF*
Moisture Content, Percent by Volume
Dry Mole Fraction
Carbon Dioxide, Percent by Volume, Dry
Oxygen, Percent by Volume, Dry
CO + N2, Percent by Volume, Dry
Gas Molecular Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole, Dry
Gas Molecular Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole, Wet
Flue Gas Static Pressure, Inches H2O
Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, Inches Hg
Flue Gas Temperature, Degrees F
Average Velocity Head, Inches H2O
Flue Gas Velocity, Feet per Second
Stack/Duct Area, Square Inches
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM*
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Wet ACFM
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, Percent
(20 C) — 29.92 In. Mercury
9-12-°"
1802-1936
12
'84
0.201
0.84
0.995
30.080
0.758
45.22
79
44.335
17.0
0.800
1.8
0.982
0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
28.64
-0.07
30.07
96
0.5174
41.49
1,075
17,434
18,588
102.6
MDFP4-M0011-2 MDFP4-M0011-3
9-13-92
0938-1132
12
84
0.201
0.84
0.995
30.080
1.108
53.617
79
52.700
19.0
0.894
1.7
0.983
0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
28.66
-0.15
30.07
89
•0.7351
49.12
1,075
20,929
22,007
101.6
(continued next page)
9-13-92
1248-1420
12
84
0.201
0.84
0.995
30.080
1.065
52.688
84
51.242
21.0
0.988
1.9
0.981
0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
28.63
-0.15
30.07
97
0.6934
48.08
1,075
20,150
21,541
102.6
-------
ALDEHYDES/KETONES TEST RESULTS
MDFP4-M0011-1
EMISSION RESULTS:
FORMALDEHYDE
Fwt Fonnula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
tig Catch Weight, micrograms
(ig/dscm ^g per dry std. cubic meter*
ppmvd ppm by volume. Dry
kg/hr kilograms per hour
Ib/hr pounds per hour
ACETALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb—mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
/ig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms perhour
pounds per hour
ACROLEIN
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
fig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ACETONE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
/ig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
PROPIONALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
jig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
CROTONALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb—mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
jig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
n-BUTYRALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb—mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
jig per dry std. cubic meter*
- -?• ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
-""""•Catch Weight, micrograms
/ig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
56.1
34
27.1
0.01161
0.000802
0.00177
SB
132
WS
0.04360
0.00311
0.00687
5&.1
16
12.7
0.00528
0.000378
0.000832
70
39
31.1
0.01067
0.000920
0.00203
72.1
87
69.3
0.02312
0.00205
0.00453
72.1
4
3.19
0.001063
0.0000944
0.000208
MDFP4-M0011-2
30
10,794
7,7-32.
?~-i,,^J:"
0.257
0.56703
44.1
88
59.0
0.03216
~ 0.00210
0.00462
56.1
36
24.1
0.01034
0.000858
0.00189
58
84
56
0.02334
0.00200
0.00441
58.1
24
16.1
0.00666
0.000572
0.00126
70
59
39.5
0.01359
0.00141
0.00310
72.1
93
62.3
0.02079
0.00222
0.00489
MDFP4-M0011-3
30
11,574
7,976
6.395
0.273
0.60203
44.1
113
77.9
0.04248
0.00267
0.00588
56.1
30
20.7
0.00886
0.000708
0.00156
58
103
71
0.02944
0.00243
0.00536
70
61
42.0
0.01445
0.00144
0.00317
72.1
98
67.5
0.02253
0.00231
0.00510
72.1"
5
3.4S
0.001150
0.000118
0.000260
Estimated catch weight.
AJJ calch weight* are leu than the minimum detection limti (MDL). Value presented calculated using 172 MDL for each catch weight.
• 58 Deg. F (20 C) - - 2952 In. Mercury (continued next page)
l»-A»r-93
-------
ALDEHYDES/KETONES TEST RESULTS
03/-
MDPP4-M0011-1
EMISSION RESULTS:
BENZALDEHYDE
Fonnula Weight, Ib/lb-mole 106.1
Caleb Weight, micrograms 22
/xg per dry std. cubic meter* VJ!,5
ppm by volume, Dry i,,,^5'v
kilograms per hour 0.000519
pounds per hour' ^.^- - 0.00114
ISOVALERALD!- •__„
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole 86.1
Caleb Weight, micrograms 49
£g per dry std. cubic meter* 39.0
ppm by volume, Dry 0.01090
kilograms ^erhstsi - 0.00116
pounds per hour 0.00255
VALERALDEHYDE
Formula.Weight, Ib/lb-mole 86.1
Catch Weight, micrograms 83
/tg per dry std. cubic meter* 66.1
ppm by volume, Dry 0.01847
kilograms per hour 0.00196
pounds per hour 0.00432
o-TOLUALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole 120.2
Catch Weight, micrograms 8
>ig per dry std. cubic meter* 6.37
ppm by volume, Dry 0.00128
kilograms per hour 0.000189
pounds per hour 0.000416
m/p - TOLU ALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole 120.2
Catch Weight, micrograms 19
/ig per dry std. cubic meter* 15.1
ppm by volume. Dry 0.00303
kilograms per hour 0.000448
pounds per hour 0.000988
HEXALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole 100.16
Catch Weight, micrograms 147
Mg per dry std. cubic meter* 117
ppm by volume, Dry 0.02812
kilograms per hour 0.00347
pounds per hour 0.00765
2,5-DIMETHYL BENZALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole 134
Catch Weight, micrograms 37
Mg per dry std. cubic meter* 29.5
ppm by volume, Dry 0.00529
kilograms per hour 0.000873
pounds per hour 0.00192
MDFP4-M0011-2
106.1
19
12.7
0.00289
0.000453
0.00100
86.1
53
35.5
0.00992
0.00126
0.00278
86.1
87
58.3
0.01629
0.00207
0.00457
120.2
12
8.04
0.00161
0.000286
0.000630
120.2
13
8.71
0.00174
0.000310
0.000683
100.16
119
79.7
0.01915
0.00284
0.00625
134
44
29.5
0.00529
0.00105
0.00231
MDFP4-M0011-3
106.1
25
17.2
0.00391
0.000590
0.00130
86.1
62
42.7
0.01194
0.00146
0.00322
86.1
94
64.8
0.01810
0.00222
0.00489
120.2
22
15.2
0.00303
0.000519
0.00114
120.2
17
11.7
0.00234
0.000401
0.000884
100.16
149
102.7
0.02466
0.00352
0.00775
134
42
28.9
_ 0.00520
0.000991
0.00218
Ettimated catch weight.
All calch weighli are ten than the minimum detection limit (MDL). Value presented calculated using Itl MDL for each catch weight
•«Deg.F(ZOC) — 29*2 to. Mercury (continued ne>t page)
-------
PM10 & CONDENSIBLE PARTICULATE TEST RESULTS
03
PLANT: Weyerhaeuser Company, Moncure, NC
SAMPLING LOCATION: MDF Press Stack 4 (WEYCO I.D. WIW-5)
Date
»*—•- Run Start & Finish Times
Net Traversing Points,
Theta Net RunJTime, Minutes
Dia Nozzle Diameter, Inches
Cp Pilot Tube Coefficient
Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor
Pbar Barometric Pressure, Inches Hg
Delta H Av& Pressure Differential of
Orifice Meter, Inches H2O
Vm Volume of Metered Gas Sample, Dry ACF
tm Dry Gas Meter Temperature, Degrees F
Vm(std) Volume of Metered Gas Sample, Dry SCF*
Vic Total Volume of Liquid Collected
in Impingers & Silica Gel, mL
Vw Volume of Water Vapor, SCF*
%H20 Moisture Content, Percent by Volume
Mfd Dry Mole Fraction
%CO2 Carbon Dioxide, Percent by Volume, Dry
%O2 Oxygen, Percent by Volume, Dry
%CO + N2 CO + N2, Percent by Volume, Dry
Md Gas Molecular Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole, Dry
Ms Gas Molecular Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole, Wet
Pg Flue Gas Static Pressure, Inches H2O
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, Inches Hg
ts Flue Gas Temperature, Degrees F """
Delta-P Average Velocity Head, Inches H2O
vs Flue Gas Velocity, Feet per Second
A Stack/Duct Area, Square Inches
Qsd Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM*
Qaw Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Wet ACFM
%I Isokinetic Sampling Rate, Percent
MDFP4 M201A/202-1
9/12/92
1625-2059
12
244.75
0.175
0.84
1.005
30.06
0.68
- 111.459
96
106.970
50
2.354
2.2
0.978
0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
28.60
-0.14
*> 30.05
96
0.6465
46.43
1075
19,411
20,802
100.7
MDFP4-M201A/202-2 M
9/13/92
840-1253
12
248
0.175
0.84
1.005
30.08
0.68
111.949
86
109.521
36
1.695
115
0.985
0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
28.68
-0.14
30.07
89
0.7260
48.8
1076
20,843
21,872
94.8
DFP4-M201A/202-3
9/13/92
1408-1812
•12
213.25 r
0.175
0.84
1.005
30.08
0.70
99.072
102
94.097
18
0.847
0.9
0.991
0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
28.74
-0.12
^ ' 30.07
97
0.6132
45.14
1076
19,104
20,232
103.3
* 68 Degrees F — 29.92 Inches of Mercury (Hg). (Continued Next Page)
-------
PM10 & CONDENSIBLE PARTICULATE TEST RESULTS
MDFP4-M201A/202-1 MDFP4-M201A/202-2 MDFP4-M201A/202-3
ucyc
Qs
D50
mg
gr/DSCF
kg/hr
Ib/hr
PM10 RESULTS:
Stack Gas Viscosity
PM10 Flow, at Cyclone Conditions, ACFM
Dia. of Particles in Cyclone, Microns
Catch.
%>PM10
% PM10, Grams
Non-extractable Condensibles, Grams
Extractable Condensibles, Grams
PM10 Emissions:
Including extractable/non-extractable condensiblcs
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
Including only non-extractable Condensibles
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
Without Condensibles
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
Total Particulate Emissions (Includes PM10):
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
Particulate Fractionation:
> PM10, %
< PM10, %
184.8
0.468
9.9
0.0035
0.0055
0.0082
0.0000
0.00169
0.127
0.281
0.00169
0.127
0.281
0.000505
0.0381
0.0840
0.00248
0.187
0.413
32.0
68.0
185.4
0.464
10.0
0.0019
0.0075
0.0030
0.0102
0.00213
0.172
0.380
0.000690
0.0559
0.123
0.000268
0.0217
0.0478
0.00318
0.258
0.568
33.2
66.8
185.4
0.467
9.9
0.0088
0.0005
0.0058
0.0020
0.00272
0.202
0.446
0.00239
0.178
0.392
0.00144
0.107
0.236
0.00280
0.208
0.459
2.9
97.1
* 68 Degrees F - - 29.92 Inches of Mercury (Hg).
19-Apr-IS
-------
APPENDIX A-5
MDF PRESS STACK 5 (WIW-3)
-------
ALDEHYDES/KETONES TEST RESULTS
041
PLANT: Weyerhaeuser Company, Moncure, NC
SAMPLING LOCATION: MDF Press Stack 5
_—-"••• '
Theta
Dia
Cp
Y
Pbar
Delta H
Vm
tm
Vm(std)
Vic
Vw
%H20
Mfd
%CO2
%02
%CO+N2
Md
Ms
-"Pg
Ps
- is
Delta -P
vs
A
. Qsd
Qaw
%I
*68Deg.F
Test Date
Run Start & Finish Times
Net Traversing Points
Net Run Time, Minutes
Nozzle Diameter, Inches
Pilot Tube Coefficient
Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor
Barometric Pressure, Inches Hg
Avg. Pressure Differential of
Orifice Meter, Inches H2O
Volume of Metered Gas Sample, Dry ACF
Dry Gas Meter Temperature, Degrees F
Volume of Metered Gas Sample, Dry SCF*
Total Volume of Liquid Collected
in Impingers & Silica Gel, mL
Volume of Water Vapor, SCF*
Moisture Content, Percent by Volume
Dry Mole Fraction
Carbon Dioxide, Percent by Volume, Dry
Oxygen, Percent by Volume, Dry
CO + N2, Percent by Volume, Dry
Gas Molecular Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole, Dry
Gas Molecular Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole, Wet
Flue Gas Static Pressure, Inches H2O
Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, Inches Hg
Flue Gas Temperature, Degrees F
Average Velocity Head, Inches H2O
Flue Gas Velocity, Feet per Second
Stack/Duct Area, Square Inches
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM*
VoLrrstric Air Flow Rate, Wet ACFM
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, Percent
(20 C) — 29.92 In. Mercury
MDFP5-M0011-1
9-12-92
1757-1904^
12
84
0.201
0.84
0.995
30.060
1.113
52.501
93
50.183
17.5
0.824
1.6
0.984
0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
28.67
-0.2
jotiS
95
0.6899
47.85
3,019
56,640
60,193
100.4
MDFP5-M0011-2
9-13-92
0935-1111
12
84
0.200
0.84
0.995
30.080
1.120
50.937
88
49.171
26.7
1.257
2.5
0.975
0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
28.57
-0.07
30.07
87
0.6326
45.58
3,019
54,233
57338
103.7
(continued next page)
MDFP5-M0011-3
9-13-92
1246-1420
12
84
0.200
0.84
0.995
30.080
1.084
50.194
100
47.463
14.0
0.659
1.4
0.986
0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
28.69
-0.07
30.07
95
0.6088
44.93
3,019
53300
56,520
101.9
-------
ALDEHYDES/KETONES TEST RESULTS
04
MDPFS-MOOll-l
EMISSION RESULTS:
FORMALDEHYDE
Fwi Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
ng Catch Weight, micrograms
iug/dscm Mg Per dry std. cubic meter*
Ib/dscf ppm by volume. Dry
ppmvd kilograms per hour
Ib/hr pounds per hour
ACETALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb- mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
fig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ACROLEIN
Formula Weight, Ib/lb- mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
ft,g per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ACETONE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
/xg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
PROPIONALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb— mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
jig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
CROTO NALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb—mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
fig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
n-BUTYRALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb—mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
Aig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb- mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
lig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
30
10,051
7,072
5.671
0.681
1.501
.-TJ, 44.1
''" 108
76.0
0.04145
0.00731
0.01612
56.1
29
20.4
0.00875
0.001%
0.00433
58
105
73.9
0.03064
0.00711
0.01568
58.1
13
9.15
0.00379
0.000880
0.00194
70L
22
15.5
0.00532
0.00149
0.00328
711
85
59.8
-=0.019%
0.00576
0.01269
MDFF5-M0011-2
30
8,101
5,817
4.665
0.536
1.182
44.1
83
59.6
0.03251
0.00549
0.01211
56.1
23
. 16.5
0.00708
0.00152
0.00336
58
89
63.9
0.02651
0.00589
0.01298
58.1
•2-
1:436
0:000595
0.0001324
0.000292
70
50
35.9
0.01234
0.00331
0.00729
711
82
58.9
0.01965
0.00543
0.01196
711
5
MDFF5-M0011-3
-30
9,198
6,843
5.487
0.620
1.366
44.1
88
65.5^
0.03571
0.00593
0.01307
56.1
40
29.8
0.01276
0.00270
0.00594
58
102
75.9
0.03147
0.00687
0.01515
58.1-
16
11.9
0.00493
0.00108
0.00238
70
63
46.9
0.01611
0.00424
0.00936
711
99
73.7
0.02457
0.00667
0.01471
0.001198:
0.000331
0.000729
Estimated catch weight.
Ail catch weighti are leu than the minimum detection limit (MDL). Value presented calculated using 1/2 MDL for each catch weight.
• 68 Deg. F (20 C) - - 29.92 In. Mercury (continued ncfl page)
19-AfT-O
-------
ALDEHYDES/KETONES TEST RESULTS
043
MDPP5-M0011-1 MDFP5-M0011-2 MDFP5-M0011-3
E.
RESULTS:
BENZALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole 106.1 106.1 106.1
Catch Weight, micrograms 3i" 15 40
>ig per dry std. cubic meter* 21.8 10.8 79.8
ppm by volume. Dry 0.00495 " 0.00244 <*:00675
kilograms per hour 0.00210 0.000993 0.00270
pounds per hour 0.00463 0.00219 0.00594
ISOVALERALDEWOE
Formula Weignt, ib/lb- mole 86.1 86.1 86.1
Catch Weight, micrograms 47 55 58
jig per dry std. cubic meter* 33.1 39.5 43.1
ppm by volume, Dry 0.00924 0.01104 0.01206
kilograms per hour 0.00318 0.00364 0.00391
pounds per hour 0.00702 0.00802 0.00862
VALERALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb- mole 86.1 86.1 86.1
Catch Weight, micrograms • 86 107 102
tt-g per dry std. cubic meter* 60.5 "76.8 75.9
ppm by volume, Dry 0.01691 - 0.02147 0.02120
kilograms per hour 0.00582 0.00708 0.00687
pounds per hour 0.01284 0.01561 0.01515
o-TOLUALDEHYDE
' Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole 120.2 120.2 120.2
Catch Weight, micrograms 20 16 26
jig per dry std. cubic meter* 14.1 11.5 19.3
ppm by volume, Dry 0.00282 0.00230 0.00387
kilograms per hour 0.00135 0.00106 0.00175
pounds per hour 0.00299 • 0.00233 0.00386
ia>p-TOLUALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, lb/5b-mole 120.2 120.2 120.2
Catch Weight, micrograms 26 24 27
Hg per dry std. cubic meter* 18.3 17.2 20.1
ppm by volume. Dry 0.00366 0.00345 0.00402
kilograms per hour 0.00176 0.00159 0.00182
pounds per hour 0.00388 0.00350 0.00401
HEXALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole 100.16 100.16 100.16
Catch Weight, micrograms 145 119 158
Mg per dry std. cubic meter* 102 85 118
ppm by volume, Dry 0.02450 0.02052 0.02823
kilograms per hour 0.00982 0.00788 0.01065
pounds per hour 0.02165 0.01736 0.02347
2,5-DIMETHYL BENZALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole 134 134 134
Caleb Weight, micrograms 36 65 - 42
fig per dry std. cubic meter* 25.3 46.7 31.2
ppm by volume, Dry 0.00455 0.00838 0.00561
kilograms per hour 0.00244 0.00430 0.00283
pounds per hour """"' " C.38S37 0.00948 0.00624
Estimated catch weight. >
All catch weight! are lea than the minimum detection limit (MDL). Value preiented calculated using 1/2 MDL for each catch weight.
•«Deg.F(20C)— 29.92 In. Mercury
-------
PM10 & CONDENSIBLE PARTICULATETEST RESULTS
PLANT: Weyerhaeuser Company, Moncure, NC
SAMPLING LOCATION: MDF Press Stack? (WEYCO LD. WIW-3)
Test Date
Run Stan & Finisb Times
Net Traversing Points
Net Run Time, Minutes
Nozzle Diameter, Inches
Pitot Tube Coefficient
Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor
Barometric Pressure, Inches Hg
Theta .
Dia
Cp
Y
Pbar
Delta H
Vm
tm
Vm(std)
Vic
Vw
%H20
Mfd
%CO2
%O2
%CO+N2
Md
Ms
*Z
Ps
tS ,-_-rs»
. Delta -P
vs
A
Qsd
Qaw
Avg. Pressure Differential of
Orifice Meter, Inches H2O
Volume of Metered Gas Sample, Dry ACF
Dry Gas Meter Temperature, Degrees F
Volume of Metered Gas Sample, Dry SCF*
Total Volume of Liquid Collected
in Impingers & Silica Gel, mL
Volume of Water Vapor, SCF*
Moisture Content, Percent by Volume
Dry Mole Fraction
Carbon Dioxide, Percent by Volume, Dry
Oxygen, Percent by Volume, Dry
CO + N2, Percent by Volume, Dry
Gas Molecular Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole, Dry
Gas Molecular Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole, Wet
Flue Gas Static Pressure, Inches H2O
Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, Inches Hg
Flue Gas Temperature, Degrees F
Average Velocity Head, Inches H2O
Flue Gas Velocity, Feet per Second
Stack/Duct Area, Square Inches
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM*
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Wet ACFM
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, Percent
vmFP<_Vf90<"->T2-l MDFP5-M223A/202-2 MDFPS-M201A/202-3
9/12/92
1625-2122
12
263.25
0.181
0.84
1.006
30.06
0.74
• 122.993
94
118.616
48
2.259
1.9
0.981
0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
28.63
0.13
30.07
96
0.7334
49.42
3019
58,216
62,168
90.8
9/13/92
840-1226
12
210.25 «»
0.179
0.84
1.006
30.08
0.74
96.388
83
94.875
28
1.318
1.4
0.986
0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
28.69
0.13
30.09
_, 88
0.5850
43.78
3019
52,583
55,073
103.0
9/13/92
1348-1842
12
261
0.179
0.84
1.006
-30.08
0.75
122.142
95
117.675
35
1.647
1.4
0.986
0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
28.69
-0.07
30.07
97
0.7615
50.35
3019
59,511
63,338
90.9
* 68 Degrees F — 29.92 Inches of Mercury (Hg). (Continued Next Page)
19-Af>r-«
-------
PM10 & CONDENSIBLE PARTICULATETEST RESULTS
MDFP5-M201A/202-1 MDFP5-M201A/202-2 MDFPS-M20LV202-3
PM10 RESULTS:
ucyc Stack Gas Viscosity
Qs PM10 Flow, at Cyclone Conditions, ACFM
D50 Dia. of Psrtvcje- ;a Cyclone, Microns
Paniculate Catch.
mg < PM10, Grams
> PM10, Grams
Non—extractable Condensibles, Grams
Extractable Condensibles, Grams
PM10 Emissions:
Including extractable/non-extractable Condensibles
gr/DSCF Concentration, grains/DSCF*
kg/hr Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Ib/hr Emission Rate, pounds/hour
Including only non—extractable Condensibles
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
Without Condensibles
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
Total Paniculate Emissions (Includes PM101:
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
Paniculate Fractionation:
%>PM10 >PM10, %
%
-------
APPENDIX A-6
MDF PRESS STACK 6 (WIW-4)
-------
ALDEHYDES/KETONES TEST RESULTS
047
PLANT: Weyerhaeuser Company, Moncure, NC
SAMPLING LOCATION: MDF Press Stack 6
Theta
Dia
Cp
Y
Pbar
Delta H
Vm
tm
Vm(std)
Vic
Vw
%H20
Mfd
%C02
%02
%CO+N2
"Md
Ms
Pg
Ps
is
Delta-P
vs
A
Qsd
Qaw
%I
*68Deg.F
i
Test Date
Run Start & Finish Times
Net Traversing Points
Net Run Time, Minutes
Nozzle Diameter, Inches
Pilot Tube Coefficient
Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor
Barometric Pressure, Inches Hg
Avg. Pressure Differential of
Orifice Meter, Inches H2O
Volume of Metered Gas Sample, Dry ACF
Dry Gas Meter Temperature, Degrees F
Volume of Metered Gas Sample, Dry SCF*
Total Volume of Liquid Collected
in Impingers & Silica Gel, mL
Volume of Water Vapor, SCF*
Moisture 'Content, Percent by Volume
Dry Mole Fraction
Carbon Dioxide, Percent by Volume, Dry
Oxygen, Percent by Volume, Dry
CO + N2, Percent by Volume, Dry
Gas Molecular Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole, Dry
Gas Molecular Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole, Wet
Flue,Gas Static Pressure, Inches H2O
•
Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, Inches Hg
Flue Gas Temperature, Degrees F
Average Velocity Head, Inches H2O
Flue Gas Velocity, Feet per Second
Stack/Duct Area, Square Inches
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM*
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Wet ACFM
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, Percent
(20 C) — 29.92 In. Mercury
VIDFP6-M0011-1
9-11-92
1928-2056
12
75
0.292
0.84
0.995
30.020
1.371
50.358
93
48.156
27.8
1.309
2.6
0.974
0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
28.56
0.2
30.03
95
0.1679
23.67
3,136
28,771
30,929
104.5
MDFP6-M0011-2
9-12-92
848-1019
12
75
0.297
0.84
0.995
30.060
1.549
53.172
82
51.990
26.5
1.247
23
0.977
0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
28.59
0.2
30.07
88
0.1716
23.75
3,136
29366
31,033
106.9
(continued next page)
MDFP6-M0011-3
9-12-92
12121 __
12
75
0.297
0.84
0.995
30.060
1.264
49333
98
46.808
15.1
0.711
1.5
0.985
0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
28.68
0.2
30.07
95
0.1410
21.64
3,136
26,624
28,277
106.1
-------
ALDEHYDES/KETONES TEST RESULTS
MDFP6-MOOU-1
EMISSION RESULTS:
FORMALDEHYDE
Fwt Formula Weight, Ib/lb - mole
ng Catch Weight, micrograms
(ig/dscm fig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppmvd ppm by volume, Dry
kg/hr kilograms per hour
Ib/hr pounds per hour
ACETALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
fig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ACROLEIN
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
fig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ACETONE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb —mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
fig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
PROPIONALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb —mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
fig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
CROTONALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
tig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
n-BUTYRALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb —mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
fig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
tig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
MDPP6-M0011-2
30
17,523
11,901
9.543
0.594
1.3092
44.1
141
95.8
0.0522
0.00478
0.01053
56.1
31
21.1
0.00903
0.00105
0.00232
58
446
303
0.1256
0.01512
0.03332
58.1
.1
0.340
0.000141
0.0000169
0.0000374
70
44
29.9
0.0103
0.00149
0.00329
72.1
361
245
0.0818
0.01223
0.02697
72.1
20
13.6
0.00453
0.000678
0.00149
MDFF6-M0011-3
30
18,654
14,072
11.284
0.63661
1.4035
167
126
0.0687
0.00570
0.01256
56.1
38
28.7
0.0123
0.00130
0.00286
58
231
174
0.0723
0.00788
0.01738
58.1
:. 1
0.377
0.000156:
0.0000171
6:0000376
70
35
26.4
0.00907
0.00119
0.00263
72.1
76
57.3
0.0191
0.00259
0.00572
72.1
14
10.6
0.00352
0.000478
0.00105
Etumated catch weight
All catch weights are \em than the minimum detection limit (MDL). Value preiented calculated using 1/2 MDL. for each catch weight
• 68 Deg. F (20 C) - - 29.92 In. Mercury (continued next page)
19- Aft-*
-------
ALDEHYDES/KETONES TEST RESULTS
049
MDFF6-M0011-1
EMISSION RESULTS:
BENZALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb—mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
M&per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ISOVALERALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/Ib-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
^g per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
VALERALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb—mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
o-TOLUALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb —mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
jig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
m/p-TOLU ALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb —mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
jig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
HEXALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
>tg per dry sid. cubic meier"
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
2,5-DIMETHYL BENZALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
MDFP6-M0011-Z
106.1
18
12.2
0.00277
0.000610
0.00134
39
26.5
0.00740
0.00132
0.00291
86.1
64
43.5
0.01214
0.00217
4.00478
120.2
5
3.40
0.000680
0.000169
0.000374
120.2
24
16.3
0.00326
0.000813
0.00179
100.16
93
63.2
0.01517
0.00315
0.00695
134
28
19.0
0.00341
0.000949
0.00209
MDFP6-M0011-3
106.1
13
9.8
0.00222
0.000444
0.000978
86.1
40
30.2
0.00843
0.00137
0.00301
86.1
83
62.6
0.01749
0.00283
0.00624
120.2
15
11.3
0.00226
0.000512
0.00113
120.2
28
21.1
0.00423
0.000956
0.00211
100.16
106
80.0
0.01921
0.00362
0.00798
134
29
21.9
0.00393
0.000990
0.00218
Eiumated catch weight
All catch weights are lea than the minimum detection limit (MDL). Value pretented calculated using 1/2 MDL for each catch weight.
1 68 Deg. F (20 C) - - 29.92 In. Mercury
W-A»,-B
-------
PM10 & CONDENSIBLE PARTICULATE TEST RESULTS
PLANT: Weyerhaeuser Company, Moncure, NC
SAMPLING LOCATION: MDF Press Stack 6 (WEYCO I.D. WIW-4)
Test Date
Run Sfcgr* .& Finish Times
Net Traversing Points
Net Run Time, Minutes
Nozzle Diameter, Inches
Pilot Tube Coefficient
Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor
Barometric Pressure, Inches Hg
Theta
Dia
Cp
Y
Pbar
Delta H
Vm
tm
Vm(std)
Vic
Vw
%H20
Mfd
%CO2
%O2
%CO+N2
Md
Ms
Pg
Ps
ts
Delta-P
vs
A
Qsd
Qaw
AVR. Pressure Differential of
Orifice Meter, Inches H2O
Volume of Metered Gas Sample, Dry ACF
Dry Gas Meter Temperature, Degrees F
Volume of Metered Gas Sample, Dry SCF*
Total Volume of Liquid Collected
in Impingers & Silica Gel, mL
Volume of Water Vapor, SCF*
Moisture Content, Percent by Volume
Dry Mole Fraction
Carbon Dioxide, Percent by Volume, Dry
Oxygen, Percent by Volume, Dry
CO + N2, Percent by Volume, Dry
Gas Molecular Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole, Dry
Gas Molecular Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole, Wet
Flue Gas Static Pressure, Inches H2O
Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, Inches Hg
Flue Gas Temperature, Degrees F ^
Average Velocity Head, Inches H2O
Flue Gas Velocity, Feet per Second
Stack/Duct Area, S'quare Inches
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM*
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Wet ACFM
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, Percent
MDFP6-M201A/202-1
9/10/92
**~^~^ 925-1458
"~ 0
249.5
0.23
0.84
0.995
30.09
0.65
117.084
95
111.539
61
2.871
2.5
0.975
0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
28.57
0.10
30.10
100
0.1900
25.27
3136
30,522
33,019
110.6
MDFP6-M201A/202-2 MI
9/11/92
735-1159
0
247.5,
0.23
0.84
0.995 '
* 30.02
0.63
113.953
90
109.311
52
2.448
2.2
0.978
0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
28.60
0.20
30.03
96
0.2012
25.91
3136
31,578
33,856
105.6
3FP6-M20W202-3
9/11/92
1353-1756
12
*• 234.75
0.23
0.84
0.995
30.02
0.64
110.8.
95
105.314
68
3.201
2.9
0.971
0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
28.53
0.10
30.03
98
0.1907
25.32
3136
30,487
33,085
111.1
• 68 Degrees F — 29.92 Inches of Mercury (Hg). (Continued Next
.'I
19-Apr-S3
-------
PM10 & CONDENSIBLE PARTICULATETEST RESULTS
05!
MDFP6-M201A/202-1 MDFP6-M20LV202-2 MDFP6-M201A/202-3
PM10 RESULTS:
ucyc Stack Gas Viscosity
Qs PM10 Flow, at Cyclone Conditions, ACFM
D50 Dia. of Panicles in Cyclone, Microns
•m*
Paniculate Catch.
mg < PM10, Grams
> PM10, Grams
Non-extractable Condensibles, Grams
Extractable Condensibles, Grams
PM10 Emissions:
Including extractable/non-extractable Condensibles
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
Including only non—extractable Condensibles
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
Without Condensibles
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
Total Paniculate Emissions (Includes PM10):
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
Paniculate Fractionation:
%>PM10 >PM10, %
%
-------
52
APPENDIX A-7
MICROBOARD CORE EFB INLET
-------
PARTICULATE & CONDENSIBLE PARTICULATE TEST RESULTS
PLANT: Weyerhaeuser Company, Moncure, NC
SAMPLING LOCATION: Core EFB Inlet
Test Date
Run Stan & Finish Times
Net Traversing Points
Net Run Time, Minutes
Nozzle Diameter, Inches
Pilot Tube Coefficient
Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor
Barometric Pressure, Inches Hg
Theta
Dia
Cp
Y
Pbar
Delta H
Vm
tm
Vm(std)
Vic
Vw
%H20
Mfd
%C02
%02
%CO + N2
Md
Ms
Pg
Ps
ts
Delta-P
vs
A
Qsd
Qaw
%I
' 68 Deg. F
Avg. Pressure Differential of
Orifice Meter, Inches H2O
Volume of Metered Gas Sample, Dry ACF
Dry Gas Meter Temperature, Degrees F
Volume of Metered Gas Sample, Dry SCF*
Total Volume of Liquid Collected
in Impingers & Silica Gel, mL
Volume of "Water Vapor, SCF»
Moisture Content, Percent by Volume
Dry Mole Fraction
Carbon Dioxide, Percent by Volume, Dry
Oxygen, Percent by Volume, Dry
CO + N2, Percent by Volume, Dry
Gas Molecular Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole, Dry
Gas Molecular Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole, Wet
Flue Gas Static Pressure, Inches H2O
Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, Inches Hg
Flue Gas Temperature, Degrees F
Average Velocity Head, Inches H2O
Flue Gas Velocity, Feet per Second
Stack/Duct Area, Square Inches
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM*
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Wet ACFM
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, Percent
(20 C) - - 29.92 In. Mercury
MBCLI-M5/202-1
9-14-92
1619-1910
24
120
0.184
0.84
1.000
30.090
0.889
59.505
87
57.816
329.0
15.486
21.1
0.789
3.0
18.0
79.0
29.20
26.84
•czn^jr
30.04
260
1.1279
72.07
1,905
33,233
57,205
103.9
MBCLI-M5/202-2 MBCLI-M5/202-3
9-15-92
1010-1411
24
60
0.191
0.84
1.000
30.150
0.987
31.973
95
30.695
210.0
9.885
24.4
0.756
3.7
16.9
79.4
29.27
26.52
_ ",--<
30.11
261
1.1338
72.64
1,905
32,142
57,657
105.8
(continued next page)
9-15-92
1547-1729
24
60
0.191
0.84
1.000
30.150
1.017
32.079
96
30.781
199.0
9.367
23.3
0.767
3.0
18.0
79.0
29.20
26.59
-0.6
30.11
262
1.0902
71.22
1,905
31,891
56,530
107.0
»-Apf-»3
-------
PARTICULATE & CONDENSIBLE PARTICULATE TEST RESULTS
05
PARTICULATE RESULTS:
Filterable
mg Catch Weigbt, milligrams
mg/DSCM Milligrams/Dry Std. Cubic Meter*
gr/DSCF Grains per Dry Std. Cubic Foot*
kg/br Kilograms per hour
Ib/hr Pounds per hour
Condensable — Extractable
Catch Weight, milligrams
Milligrams/Dry Std. Cubic Meter*
Grains per Dry Std. Cubic Foot*
Kilograms per hour
Pounds per hour
Condensable — Non—Extractable
Catch Weight, milligrams
Milligrams/Dry Std. Cubic Meter*
Grains per Dry Std. Cubic Foot*
Kilograms per hour
Pounds per hour
Total Paniculate
Catch Weight, milligrams
Milligrams/Dry Std. Cubic Meter*
Grains per Dry Std. Cubic Foot*
Kilograms per hour
Pounds per hour
MBCLI-MS/202-1
336.4
205
0.0898
11.6
25.6
156.5
95.6
0.0418
5.40
11.9
138.2
84.4
0.0369
4.77
10.5
631.1
385
0.168
21.8
48.0
MBCLI-M5/202-2
213.0
245
0.107
13.4
29.5
"* 90^0
104
0.0452
5.65
12.5
68.3
78.6
0.0343
4.29
9.46
371.3
427
0.187
23.3
51.4
MBCLI-M5/202-3
178.2
204
0.0893
11.1
24.4
99.1
114
0.0497
6.16
13.6
76.5
87.8
0.0384
4.76
10.5
353.8
406
0.177
22.0
48.5
* 68 Deg. F (20 C) - - 29.92 In. Mercury
-------
PARTICULATE & CONDENSIBLE PARTICULATE TEST RESULTS
055
PLANT: Weyerhaeuser Company, Moncure, NC
SAMPLING LOCATION: Core EFB Inlet
Test Date
Run Start & Finish Times
Net Traversing Points
Net Run Time, Minutes
Nozzle Diameter, Inches
Pitot Tube Coefficient
Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor
Barometric Pressure, Inches Hg
Theta
Dia
Cp
Y
Pbar
Delta H
Vm
tm
Vm(std)
Vic
Vw
%H20
Mfd
%CO2
%02
%CO + N2
Md
Ms -
Pg
Ps
ts
Delta-P
vs
A
Qsd
Qaw
%I
* 68 Deg. F
Avg. Pressure Differential of
, Orifice Meter, Inches H2O
Volume of Metered Gas Sample, Dry ACF
Dry Gas Meter Temperature, Degrees F
Volume of Metered Gas Sample, Dry SCF*
Total Volume of Liquid Collected
in Impingers & Silica Gel, mL
Volume of Water Vapor, SCF*
Moisture Content, Percent by Volume
Dry Mole Fraction
Carbon Dioxide, Percent by Volume, Dry
Oxygen, Percent by Volume, Dry
CO + N2, Percent by Volume, Dry
Gas Molecular Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole, Dry
Gas Molecular Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole, Wet
Flue Gas £±.1;: T.,: .,, '-"•>"— TT^^
Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, Inches Hg
Flue Gas Temperature, Degrees F
Average Velocity Head, Inches H2O
Flue Gas Velocity, Feet per Second
Stack/Duct Area, Square Inches
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM*
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Wet ACFM
- Isokinetic Sampling Rate, Percent
(20 C) — 29.92 In. Mercury
MBCLJ-M5/202-4
9-15-92
1619-1910
24
60
0.191
0.84
1.000
30.150
0.979
31.458
87
30.654
218.0
10.261
25.1
0.749
3.8
17.0
79.2
29.29
26.46
-0.7
30.10
262
1 1031
71.83
1,905
31,401
57,014
108.2
"-Apr-93
w»27d»UVm5-202\.ppV:liS«r4.wt3
-------
PARTICULATE & CONDENSIBLE PARTICULATE TEST RESULTS
MBCLI-M5/202-4
PARTICULATE RESULTS:
Filterable
mg Catch Weight, milligrams 296.1
mg/DSCM Milligrams/Dry Std. Cubic Meter* 341
gr/DSCF Grains per Dry Std. Cubic Foot* 0.149
kg/hr Kilograms per bour 18.2
Ib/hr Founds per hour 40.1
Condensable — Extractable
Catch Weight, milligrams 73.5
Milligrams/Dry Std. Cubic Meter* 84.7
Grains per Dry Std. Cubic Foot* 0.0370
Kilograms per hour 4.52
Pounds per hour 9.96
Condensable — Non—Extractable
Catch Weight, milligrams 74.8
Milligrams/Dry Std. Cubic Meter* 86.2
Grains per Dry Std. Cubic Foot* 0.0377
Kilograms per hour 4.60
Pounds per hour 10.1
Total Paniculate
Catch Weight, milligrams 444.4
Milligrams/Dry Std. Cubic Meter* 512
Grains per Dry Std. Cubic Foot* 0.224
Kilograms per hour 27.3
Pounds per hour , 60.2
* 68 Deg. F (20 C) — 29.92 In. Mercury
-------
APPENDIX A-8
MICROBOARD CORE EFB OUTLET (1520)
-------
ALDEHYDES/KETONES TEST RESULTS
05&
PLANT: Weyerhaeuser Company, Moncure, NC
SAMPLING LOCATION: Microboard Core Layer EFB Outlet
MBCLO-M0011-1
Theta
Dia
Cp
Y
Pbar
Delta H
Vm
tm
Vm(std)
Vic
Vw
%H20
Mfd
%C02
%O2
%CO+N2
Md
Ms
Pg
Ps
ts
Delta-P
vs
A
Qsd
Qaw —
%I
* 68 Deg. F
Test Date
Run Start & Finish Times
Net Traversing Points "
Net Run Time, Minutes
Nozzle Diameter, Inches
Pilot Tube Coefficient
Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor
Barometric Pressure, Inches Hg
Avg. Pressure Differential of
Orifice Meter, Inches H2O
Volume of Metered Gas Sample, Dry ACF
Dry Gas Meter Temperature, Degrees F
Volume of Metered Gas Sample, Dry SCF*
Total Volume of Liquid Collected
in Impingers & Silica Gel, mL
Volume of Water Vapor, SCF*
Moisture Content, Percent by Volume
Dry Mole Fraction
Carbon Dioxide, Percent by Volume, Dry
Oxygen, Percent by Volume, Dry
CO + N2, Percent by Volume, Dry
Gas Molecular Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole, Dry
Gas. Molecular Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole, Wet
Flue Gas Static Pressure, Inches H2O
Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, Inches Hg
Flue Gas Temperature, Degrees F
Average Velocity Head, Inches H2O
Flue Gas Velocity, Feet per Second
Stack/Duct Area, Square Inches
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM*
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Wet ACFM
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, Percent
(20 C) — 29.92 In. Mercury
9-14-92
1711-1816
- - i-2 -'
60
0.241
0.84
1.000
30.1
1.875
50.23
94
48.372
" 280.6
13.208
21.4
0.786
3.6
17.0
79.4
29.26
26.85
0.58
30.13
248
1.0340
68.3
2,227
37,421
63,380
105.2
MBCLO-MOOll-2 MBCLO-M001-3
9-15-92
1304-1409
12
60
0.241
0.84
1.000
30.2
1.908
49.556
93
47.868
275.2
12.954
21.3
0.787
3.5
17.0
79.5
29.24
26.85
0.58
30.19
250
1.0894
70.16
2,227
38,439
65,106
101.3
(continued next page)
9-15-92
1633-1738
12
60
0.241
0.84
1.000
30.2
1.942
50.731
101
48.275
273.4
12.869
21.0
0.790
3.6
17.0
79.4
29.26
26.90
0.58
30.19
252
1.1465
72
2,227
39,491
66,813
99.5
-------
ALDEHYDES/KETONES TEST RESULTS 0 5 I
MBCLO-MOOll-l MBCLO-M0011-2 MBCLO-M001-3
EMISSION RESULTS:
FORMALDEHYDE
Fwt Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
(ng Catch Weight, micrograms
jig/dscm jig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppmvd ppm by volume, Dry
kg/hr kilograms per hour
Ib/hr pounds per hour
ACETALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
jig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ACROLEIN
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
jig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ACETONE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
jig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
PROPIONALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
^,g per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
CROTONALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb—mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
jig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
n-BUTYRALDEHYDE
.». Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
•is, tesxr.^ Qajdj Weight, micrograms
jig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
METHYL ETHYLKETONE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
jig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
• 68 Deg. F (20 C) — 29.92 In. Mercury
30 30
14,630 22,031
10,680 16,252
8364 13.032
0.679 1.061
1.49711 234018
44.1 44.1
8^28 8,413
6,079 6,206
3.316 3385
0387 0.405
0.852 0.894
56.1 56.1
3783 2910
2,762 2,147
1.184 0.920
0.176 0.140'
0387 0309
58 58
10,860 5,219
7,928 3,850
3.288 1.597
0304 0.251
1.111 0.554
58.1 58.1
1,063 433
776 319
0321 0.132
0.0493 0.0209
0.109 0.0460
70 70
566 651
413 480
0.142 0.165
0.0263 0.0314
0.0579 0.0692
72.1 72.1
2,727 1,277
1,991 942
0.664 0314
0.127 0.0615
0.279 0.136
72.1 72.1
962 1,034
702 763
0234 0254
0.0447 0.0498
0.0984 0.110
(continued next page)
30
20,006
14,633
11.734
0.982
2.16483
44.1
8,037
5,879
3207
0394
0.870
56.1
1329
972
0.417
0.065
0.144
58
16,187
11,840
4.911
0.794
1.752
' 58.1
2,116
1348
0.641
0.104
0229
70
2224
1,627
0359
0.109
0241
72.1
6,024
4,406
1.470
0296
0.652
72.1
1,117
817
0273
0.0548
0.121
-------
ALDEHYDES/KETONES TEST RESULTS
OGO
MBCLO-MOOll-l
EMISSION RESULTS:
BENZALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
jig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ISOVALERALCZ: IYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
fig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
VALERALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
/Ag per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
o-TOLUALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
>ig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
m/p-TOLUALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
fj.g per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
HEXALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
/ig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
2,5-DIMETHYL BENZALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
fj.g per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
106.1
11,893
8,682
1.968
0.552
1217
86.1
1,861
1358
0.3796
0.0864
0.1904
86.1
868
634
0.177
0.0403
0.0888
1202
956
698
0.140
0.0444"
0.0978
120.2
3,490
2,548
0.510
0.162
0357
100.16
2,127
1453
0373
0.0987
0218
134
181
132
0.0237
0.0084
0.0185
MBCLO-MOOll-2
106.1
15,974
11,784
2.672
0.770
1.697
86.1
2,103
1,551
0.4334
0.1013
02234
86.1
2232
1,646
0.460
0.1075
02371
1202
1311
967
0.194
0.0632
0.1393
1202
4238
3,126
0.626
0204
0.450
100.16
2,423
1,787
0.429
0.117
0257
134
220
162
0.0291
0.0106
0.0234
MBCLO-MOOl-3
106.1
12223
8,941
2,027
0.600
1323
86.1
2,151
1,573
0.4396
0.1056
02328
86.1
1,632
1,194
0334
0.0801
0.1766
1202
1292
945
0.189
0.0634
0.1398
1202
1,149
840
0.168
0.056
0.124
100.16
2,978
2,178
0.523
0.146
0322
134
1386
1,014
0.1820
0.0680
0.1500
' 68 Deg. F (20 C) — 29.92 In. Mercury
-------
PM10 & CONDENSIBLE PARTICULATE TEST RESULTS
06
PLANT: Weyerhaeuser Company, Moncure, NC
SAMPLING LOCATION: Microboard Core Layer Dryer EFB Outlet (WEYCO I.D. 1520)
MBCLO-M201A/202-2 MBCLO-M201A/202-3 MBCLO-V""'
Test Date
Run Start & Finish Times
-&*•••* 'Net Traversing Points
Theta Net Run Time, Minutes
Dia Nozzle Diameter, Inches
Cp Pitot Tube Coefficient
Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor
Pbar Barometric Pressure, Inches Hg
Delta H Avg. Pressure Differential of
Orifice Meter, Inches H2O
Vm VolumS of Metered Gas Sample, Dry ACF
tm Dry Gas Meter Temperature, Degrees F
Vm(std) Volume of Metered Gas Sample, Dry SCF*
Vic Total Volume of Liquid Collected
in Impingers & Silica Gel, mL
Vw Volume of Water Vapor, SCF*
%H20 Moisture Content, Percent by Volume
Mfd Dry Mole Fraction
%CO2 Carbon Dioxide, Percent by Volume, Dry
%O2 Oxygen, Percent by Volume, Dry
%CO+N2 CO + N2, Percent by Volume, Dry
Md Gas Molecular Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole, Dry
Ms Gas Molecular Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole, Wet
Pg Flue Gas Static Pressure, Inches H2O
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, Inches Hg
ts Flue Gas Temperature, Degrees F
Delta-P Average Velocity Head, Inches H2O
vs Flue Gas Velocity, Feet per Second
A Stack/Duct Area, Square Inches
Qsd Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM*
Qaw Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Wet ACFM
%I Isokinetic Sampling Rate, Percent
9/15/92
1204-1411
12
91
0.165
0.84
0.995
30.15
0.41
34.035
92
32.642
221
10.402
24.2
0.758
3.0
17.9
79.1
29.20
26.49
0.58
30.19
251
1.1369
72.17
2227
38,063
66,969
98.2
9/15/92
1546-1736
.^~ 12
95.5
«•
0.165
0.84
0.995
30.15
0.41
36.755
94
35.152
199
9.367
21.0
0.790
3.0
17.9
79.1
29.20
26.85"
0.58
30.19
252
1.1883
73.39
2227
40,233
68,101
95.3
9/15/92
1857-2029
12
87.5
0.165
0.84
0.995
30.15
0.41
32.538 ,
87
31.520
203
9.555
23.3
0.767
3.5
17.4
79.1
29.26
26.64
0.58
30.19
252
1.1570
72.67
2227
38,705
67,433
96.9
* 68 Degrees F — 29.92 Inches of Mercury (Hg). (Continued Next Page)
l9-Aj>r-«B
-------
062
PM10 & CONDENSIBLE PARTICULATETEST RESULTS
gr/DSCF
kg/hr
Ib/hr
MBCLO-M201 A/202-2 MBCLO-M201A/202-3 MBCLO-M201 A/202-4
PM10 RESULTS:
ucyc Stack Gas Viscosity
Qs PM10 Flow, at Cyclone Conditions, ACFM
D50 Dia. of Particles in Cyclone, Microns **"
Paniculate Catch.
mg < PM10, Grams
> PM10, Grams
Non-extractable Condensibles, Grams
Extractable Condensibles, Grams
PM10 Emissions:
Including extractable/non—extractable Condensibles
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
Including only non—extractable condensibles
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
Without condensibles
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
Total Paniculate Emissions (Includes PM10):
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
Particulate Fractionation:
%>PM10 >PM10, %
%
-------
SEMIVOLATILE ORGAN1CS TEST RESULTS
PLANT: Weyerhaeuser Company, Moncure, NC
SAMPLING LOCATION: Microboard Core Layer Dryer EFB Outlet (WEYCO I.O. 1 520)
Test Date
Run Start & Finish Times
Net Traversing Points
Theta Net Run Time, Minutes
Dia Nozzle Diameter, Inches
Cp P'rtot Tube Coefficient
Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor
Pbar Barometric Pressure, Inches Hg
Delta H Avg. Pressure Differentia] of
Orifice Meter, Inches H2O
Vm Volume of Metered Gas Sample, Dry ACF
tm Dry Gas Meter Temperature, Degrees F
Vm(std) Volume of Metered Gas Sample, Dry SCF*
Vic TotaJ Volume of Liquid Collected
in Impingers & Silica Gel, ml
Vw Volume of Water Vapor, SCF*
%H20 Moisture Content, Percent by Volume
Mfd Dry Mole Fraction
%CO2 Carbon Dioxide, Percent by Volume, Dry
%O2 Oxygen, Percent by Volume, Dry
%CO+N2 CO + N2, Percent by Volume, Dry
Md Gas Molecular Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole, Dry
Ms Gas Molecular Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole, Wet
Pg Flue Gas Static Pressure, Inches H2O
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, Inches Hg
ts Flue Gas Temperature, Degrees F
Delta- P Average Velocity Head, Inches H2O
vs Flue Gas Velocity, Feet per Second
A Stack/Duct Area, Square Inches
Qsd Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM*
Qaw Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Wet ACFM
%l Isokinetic Sampling Rate, Percent
* 68 Deg. F (20 C) -- 29.92 In. Mercury
MBCLO-M0010-1
9-17-92
1204-1533
12
180
6'229
0.84
0.995
30.000
1.845
137,448
106
128.497
831.0
39.115
23.3
0.767
4.0
17.0
79.0
29.32
,fr 26.68
0
30.00
254
1.1461
72.63
2,227
38,306
67,398
100.8
MBCLO-M0010-2 f
--"" """ 9-17-92
1801-2035
12
144
0.229
0.84
1.000
30.000
2.240
113.976
85
111.279
585.0
27.536
19.8
0.802
4.0
17.0
79.0
29.32
27.08
0
30.00
252
1.1830
73.12
2,227
40,463
67,852
103.3
dBCLO-M0010-3
9-18-92
1249-1551
12
144
0.229
0.84
1.000
30.000
2.590
104.504
96
100.098
685.0
32.243
24.4
0.756
4.0
17.0
79.0
29.32
26.56
0
30.00
253
1.0638
70.07
2,227
36,500
65,022
103.0
(continued next page)
-------
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS TEST RESULTS
4-
EMISSION RESULTS:
__> P-CYMENE
Fwt Formula Weight Ib/lb-mole
yg- Catch Weight micrograms
pg/dscm pg per dry std. cubic meter"
ppmvd ppm by volume, Dry
kg/hr kilograms per hour
|b/hr pounds per hour
A-PINENE
Formula Weight Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
fjg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
B-PINENE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
fig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
A-TERPINEOL
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight micrograms
yg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
'kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
MBCLO-M0010-1
134.2
_ 2043
561
0.1006
0.03654
0.08056
136.2
634214
174,281
30.78218
11.34386
25.00906
136.2
259058
71,189
12.57363
4.63364
10.21548-
154.3
58613
16,107
2.51113
1.04838
2.31130
MBCLO-M0010-2
MBCLO-M0010-3
134.2"
i
0.159
0.0000284
0.0000109
0.0000240
"136.2
698375
221,606
39.14101
15.23649
33.59088
136.2
192381
61,046
10.78215
4.19719
9.25326
154.3
35724
11,336
1.76732
0.77939
1.71828
134.2
1698
599
0.08190
136.2
542372
191,328
33.79313
11.86632
26.16089
136.2
203170
71,671
12.65875
4.44507
9.79975
154.3
43801
15,451
2.40894
0.95830
2.11271
Estimated catch weight
Catch weight less than minimum detection limt (MDL). Value presented calculated using 1/2 MDL
• 58 Oeg. F (20 C) — 29.92 In. Mercury
-------
VOLATILE ORGANIC TEST RESULTS
PLANT: Weyerhaeuser Company, Moncure. NC
SAMPLING LOCATION: Core EFB Outlet (WEYCO I.D. 1520)
06
Theu
Y
Pb»r
Vm
Lm
Vm(ud)
CM
Pwt
eg
ppmvd
kg/br
ib/hr
Tot Date
Run Start Time
Run Finish Time
Net Run Time, Minute*
Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor
Barometric Procure, mm Hg
Volume of Metered Gam Sample, DAL
Dry Ga* Meter Temperature, Degree* C
Volume of Metered Gas Sample, Dry SL'
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, DrySCFM*
EMISSION RESULTS:
A-Pin eo e
Formula Weight, 1Mb-mole
Catch Weight, mkrogram*
p$ per dry ud. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilogram! per hour
poundi per hour
B-Pinene
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-moie
Catch Weight, mtcrogram*
MS per dry »td. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry.
kilograms per hour
pound* per hour
Acetone
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, mkrogram*
>tg per dry ud. cubic meter*
— ppb by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
Toluene
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-moie
Catch Weight, microgram*
jtg per dry wd. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilogrami per hour
pounds per hour
P-Cymene
Formula Weight, Ih/lb-mole
Catch Weigh L, inicrograms
fig per dry ltd. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilogrami per hour
pound* per hour
m-/p-Xylene _ „
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
Mg per dry *td. cubk meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilogrami per hour
pounds per hour
Benzene
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, microgram!
jig per dry std. cubk meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilogram* per hour
pound* per hour
* 68 Deg. P (20 C) - - 29.92 In. Mercury
Ettimated roulu or not detectable (underlined)
unri n-unntn-1. MRri.n-unovwib MBCLO-M0030-ld
9/17/92
1219
1239
20
0.9963
762
^8.17
36.0
17.225
48,645
136.24
373.7
21,700
3830
1.79
3.95
136.24
246.2
14,300
2520
1.18
2.60
S8.08
83.8
4,850
2010
0.401
0.884
92.15
12.9
749
196
0.0619
0.136
134.22
7.3
424
76.0
0.0350
0.0772
106.16
6.6
383
86.8
0.0317
0.0698
78.12
5.6
325
100
0.0269
0.0592
9/17/92
1301
1321
20
0.9963
_^BS_ 762
18.38^
34.5
17.396
48,645 '
"136.24
353.3
20,300
3590 _
L«8
3.71
136.24
235.1
13,500
2390
1.12
2.47
58.08
78.7
4,510
1870
0.373
0.823
92.15
9.1
523
137
0.0432
0.0953
134 .22
5.1
293
52.5
0.0242
0.0534
106.16
3.8
218
49.5
0.0181
0.0398
78.12
2J
126
38.9
0.0105
0.0230
9/17/92
1426
^-•-'•-^-^•^^ja
0.9963
762
18.72
36.0
17.74*
48,645
136.24
414.7
23,200
4090
1.91
422
136.24
303.2
17.10»
3020
Ml
3.K
58.08
58.0
3.2*0
1350
0.269
0,594
92.15
14.6
823
215
0.0680
0.150
134.22
8.1
4S6
81.8
0.0377
0.0832
106.16
6.3
355
80.4
0.0293
0.0647
78.12
8.7
490
151
0.0405
0.0893
Average
N/A
N/A
21,700
3.840
1.80
3.96
N/A
N/A
15,000
2,640
1.24
2.73
N/A
N/A
4,210
1.74O
0.348
0.767
N/A
N/A
698
182
0.0577
0.127
N/A
N/A
391 "
70.1
0.0323
0.0713
N/A
N/A
319
72.3
0.0264
0.0581
N/A
N/A
314
96.7
0.0259
0.0572
(continued next page)
-------
VOLATILE ORGANIC TEST RESULTS
OGG
MBCLO-M0030-la MBCLO-M0030-lb MBCLO-M0030-ld
Average
Cumene (iaopropylbenzene)
Formula Weight, 1Mb- mole
Citch Weight, micrograma
Mg per dry atd. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilograms per bour
pouoda per faour
Metbylene Chloride
Formula Weight, Ib/lb— mole
Catch Weight, micrograma
jig per dry aid. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilograma per hour
pouoda per bour
2-Butaoone
Formula Weight, Ib/lb- mole
Catch Weight, micrograma
fH per dry ttd. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilograma per bour
pouoda per bour
Chloromethane
Formula Weight, Ib/lb- mole
Catch Weight, micrograma
MB per dry atd. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilograma per bour
pounds per bour
lodom ethane
Formula Weight, Ib/lb- mole
Catch Weight, micrograma
fig per dry atd. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilograma per bour
pounda per bour
o- Xylene
Formula Weight, Ib/lb- mole
Caleb Weight, micrograma
fig per dry atd. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilograma per bour
pounda per bour
Styrene
Formula Weight, 1Mb- mole
Catch Weight, micrograma
fig per dry atd. cu bic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kiiograma per hour
pounda per bour
Isooctane
• Formula Weight, Ib/lb- mole
Caleb Weight, micrograma
pg per dry atd. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilogram* per bour
pounda per bour
Formula Weight, Ib/lb- mole
Catch Weight, microgrami
fig per dry atd. cubic meter*
ppb by vohtme, Dry
kilograma per bour
pounda per hour
• 68 DeB. F (20 C) -- 29.92 In. Mercury
Euimated reaulta or not detectable (underlined)
120.2
1.8
104
20.9
0.00864
0.0190
.;.„..
0.2
11.6
3.29
0.000960
OJH"!? -,,
72.11
4.4
255
85.2
0.0211
0.0465
50.49
t2
128
60.9
0.0106
0.0233
141.94
0.0025
0.145
OJ246
0.0000 120
0.0000264
106.16
0.6
34.8
7.89
0.00288
0.00635
104.15
0.9
522
12.1
0.00432
0.00952
114.23
0.0025
0.145
0.0306
0.0000120
0.0090264
119.38
0.0025
0.145
0.0292
0.0000120
0.0000264
120.2
1.3
74.7
15.0
0.00618
o.mvi,
84.93
0.1
5.75
1.63
0.000475
0.00105
72.11
0.0025
0.144
0.0479
0.0008119
0.0000262
50.49
0.0025
" 0.144
0.0685
0.0000119
P.0000262
141.94
0.0025
0.144
0.0244
0.0000119
0.0008262
106.16
0.3
17.2
3.91
0.00143
0.00314
104.15
0.0025
0.144
0.0332
0.0006119
0.0000262
114.23
0.0025
0,144
0.0303
0.0000119
0.0009262
119.38
0.1
5.75
1.16
O.OO047S
0.00105
120.2
1.6
°«2 ..
O.U0745
0.0164
84.93
0.6
33.8
9.58
0.00279
*"" 0.00616
72.11
0.0025
0.141
4).0470a»
0.0000116
0.0000257
50.49
0.0025
0.141
0.0671
0.0000116
0.0000257
141.94
13.
124
21.0
0.0102
0.0226
106.16
0.3
16.9
3.83
0.00140
0.00308
104.15
0.0025
0.141
0.0325
0.00001)6
0.0000257
114.23
0.4
22.5
4.75
0.00186
0.00411
119.38
0.0025
0.145
0:0292 '
0.0009120
0.0000264
N/A
N/A
89.8
18.0
0.00742
0.0164
N/A
N/A
17.1
4.83
0.00141
0.00311
N/A
N/A
85.2
28.4
0.00705
0.0155
N/A
N/A
42.7
20.3
0.00353
0.00778
N/A
N/A
41.4
7.02
0.00342
0.00755
N/A
N/A
23.0
5.21
0.00190
0.00419
N/A
N/A
17.5
4.04
0.00145
0.00319
N/A
N/A
7.61
1.60
0.000629
0.001JV
N/A
N/A
2.01
0.41
0.000166
0.000367
-------
VOLATILE ORGANIC TEST RESULTS
PLANT: Weyerhaeuser Company, Moacure, NC
SAMPLING LOCATION: Core EFB Outlet (WEYCO I.D. 1520)
Tbeta
Y
Ptaar
Vm
s^-
im
Vm(ud)
CM
Pwt
MS
ftg/dscm
ppmvd
kg/hr
Ib/hr
Tot Dale
Run Surt Time
Run Finish Time
Net Run Time, Mimtf. *
Dry Gm Meter Calibration Factor
Barometric Pressure, mm Hg
Volume at Metered Oa> Sample, DAL
Dry GM Meter Tempc.-iuie, Degrees C
Volume of Metered GM Sample, Dry SL*
Volumetric Air Plow Rue, DrySCFM*
EMISSION RESULTS:
A-Pinene
Formula Weight, Ib/lb- mole
Catch Weight, microgrami
fig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
B-Pincoe
Formuli Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, mtcrograms
fig per dry ud. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
Acetone
Formula Weight, Ib/lb- mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
fig per dry sld. cubic meter*
ppb. by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
Toluene
Formula Weight. Ib/lb—mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
fig per dry ud. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per bour
P-Cymene
Formula Weight, Ib/lb- mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
jig per dry std. cubic meter4
ppb by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per bour
m-/p-Xylene
Formula Weight, Ib/lb- mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
fig per dry ud. cubic meter*
ppb by volume, Dry
kilograms per bour
pounds per hour
Benzene
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
IH per dry ud. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilograms per bour
pounds per bour
- 1804
^ 1824
20
-0.9963
762
_ 4-38
36.3
6.043
51,850
136 .24
331.6
54,900
9*90
4.84
10.7
136.24
184.7
30.«00
5400
2.69
5.94
58.08
47.2
7.800
3230
0.687
1.51
92.15
5.5
910
238
0.0802
0.177
134.22
6.5
1.680
193
0.0948
0.209
106.16
1.1
182
41.2
0.0160
0.0354
78.12
0.0025
0.520
9.160
0.0000458
4900111.
>2 '
1838
1858
20
0.9963
762
5.04
34.0
4.809
51,850
136 .24
1262.7
263,000
46400
23.2
51.0
136 .24
664.9
138,000
24400
122
26.8
58.08
175.8
36.500
15100
3.21
7.08
92.15
11.5
2,390
624
0.211
0.464
134.22
8.9
1.850
332
0.163
0.359
106.16
10.
457
103.7
0.0403
0.0889
78.12
0.0025
0.520
0.160
0.0000458
9.000191
9/17/92
1928
1948
20
0.9963
762
•^>
29.5
4.745
51,850
136.24
497.8
105.000
18500
9.23
20.4
136.24
255.2
53.800
- 9500
4.74
10.5
58.08
78.1
16,500
6820
1.45
3.20
92.15
4.8
1.010
264
0.0891
0.196
134.22
3.6
759
136
0.0668
0.147
106.16 '•*>
0.8
169
38.2
0.0149
0.0327
78.12
0.0025
0.520
0.140
0.000045ft
0.000101
Averate
N/A
N/A
141,000
-24,900
12.4
27.4
N/A
N/A
74,100
13,100
6.54
14.4
N/A
N/A
20,300
8,380
1.78
3.93
N/A
N/A
1.440
375
0.127
0.279
N/A
N/A
1.230
220
0.108
0.239
N/A
N/A
269
61.0
0.0237
0.0523
N/A
N/A
0.520
0.160
0.0000458
0.000101
• 68 Deg. P (20 C) - - 29.92 In. Mercury
(continued next page)
-------
VOLATILE ORGANIC TEST RESULTS
068
MBCLO-M0030-2a MBCLO-M0030-2b MBCLQ-M0030-2c
Average
Cumene (isopropyl benzene)
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
pg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilogram* per hour
pounds per hour
Methylene Chloride
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-molc
Catch Weight, microgram*
pf, per dry Ad. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
2-Butaoooe
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, mKrograms
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilogram* per hour
pounds per hour
Chtorom ethane
Formula Weight* lb/16— mole
Catch Weight, micrograou
>tg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
p-Thinft* per hour
lodomethane
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
^% per dry ltd. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilogram* per hour
pounds per hour
o— Xylene
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
CV"h Weight, micrograms
*ig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
Styrene
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
jtg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
Isooctane
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
jig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
Chloroform
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, mkrograms
Mg per dry sld. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
* 68 Deg. P (20 C) - - 29.92 In. Mercury
Estimated results or not detectable (underlined)
120.2
1.0
165 «
33.1
0.014*
0.0321
84.93
0.9
149
42-Z
0.0131
0.0289
72.11
0.0025
3.520
0.173
0.0000458
0.000101
50.49-
QM25
. 0.520
*248 .
0.0000458
o.oooioi
141.94
0.0915
0.520
0.088
0.0000458
9.000191
106.16
0.092J
0.520
9.118
0.0000458
0.000191
104.15
0.0925
ft5M
0.120
0.0000458
ftPOOiei
114J3
0.0025 :
jyjo
fi.122
0.0000458
, ^«1Q101
119.38
0.2
33.1
6.67
0.00292
0.00643
120.2
0.0025
«.52Q
<.1Q4
0.0000458
0.000101
84.93
0.6
125
35.3
0.0110
0.0242
72.11
O.OOZ5
6.520
, ».173
0.0000458
«.oooior
50.49
0.0925 .
9.520
0.748
0.0000458
0.000101
141.94
0.0025
0.520
0.088
0.0000458
9.000101
106.16
0.0025 ,
O.S20
9.118
0.0900458
0.000101
104.15
O.OOZ5
0.52»
9.120
0.0000458
0.000191
114^3
0.0025
0.520
O.IW
0.0000458
9.000101
119.38
0.0025
0.520
0.105
0,0000458
0.000101
120.2
0.5
105
21.1
0.00928
0.0205
84.93
1.0
211
59.7
0.0186
0.0409
72.11
0402*
0.520
0.173
0.0000458
0.000101
50.49
0.0025
0.520
0-Z48
04)0004 S3
0.000101-
141.94
0.0025
0.520
0.088
0.0000458
0.000101
106.16
0.002?
0.520
0.118
0:0000458
0.000101
104.15
0.0025
0.520
0.120
0.0000456
0.000101
114.23
0.002S
4J20
0.109
0.0000458
0.000101
119.38
0.0025
0^27
0.106
0.0000464
0.000102
N/A
N/A
90.5
18.1
0.00797
0.0176
N/A
N/A
161
45.7
0.0142
0.0314
N/A
N/A
0.520
0.173
0.0000458
0.000101
N/A
N/A
0.520
0.248
0.0000458
0.000101
N/A
N/A
0.520
0.0881
0.0000458
0.000101
N/A
N/A
0.520
0.118
0.0000458
0.000101
N/A
N/A
0.520
0.120
0.0000458
0.000101
N/A
N/A
0.520
0.109
0.0000458
0.000101
N/A
N/A
11.4
229
0.00100
0.00221
-------
VOLATILE ORGANIC TEST RESULTS
PLANT: Weyerhieuser Company, Moncure, NC
SAMPLING LOCATION: Core EFB Outlet (WEYCO I.D. 1520)
MBCLO-M0030-3* MBCLO-M0030-3b MBCLO-M0030-3C
Tbcu
Y
Pb«r
Vm
iij-SBS
Vm(ud)
Old
Fwt
«
Mg/dicm
ppmvd
tg/hr
Ib/br
Tat Date
Run Stan Time
Run Piniah Time
Net RunTime, Mioutei
Dry Ga* Meter Calibration Factor
Barometric Preoure, mm Hg
Volume of Metered-G.-^ Sample, DAL
Dry Ga> Meter Temperature, Degrees C
Volume of Metered Ga* Sample. Dry SL*
Volumetric Air Plow Rate, Dry SCFM'
EMISSION RESULTS:
A-Pnene
Formula Weight, Ib/lb- mole
Catch Weight, microgrami
>ig per dry ltd. cubic meter4
ppb by volume. Dry
kilogram* per hour
pound* per hour
B-Pinene
Formula Weight. 1Mb- mole
Catch Weight, microgram*
Mg per dry ltd. cubic meter4
ppb by volume. Dry
kilogram* per hour
pounds per hour
Acetone
Formula Weight, Ib/lb- mole
Catch Weight, microgrami
pg per dry ltd. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilogram* per hour
pound* per hour
Toluene
Formula Weight, Ib/lb- mole
Catch Weight, microgrami
Mg per dry ud. cubic meter*
ppb by volume, Dry
kilogram* per hour
pound* per hour
P-Cymene
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, microgram*
pg per dry ud. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilogram* per hour
pound* per hour
.vm—/p— Xylene -
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, microgrami
Mg per dry ud. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pound* per hour
Benzene
Formula Weight, Ib/lb- mole
Catch Weight, microgrami
fig per dry ud. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilogram* per hour
pound* per hour
• 68 Deg. F (20 C) 29.92 In. Mercury
Estimated result*
9/18/92
1255
1315
20
0.99«3
764
5.48
36.8
5.194
52,961
9/18/92
1333
1353
20
0.9963
764
5.14
37.0
4.868
52,961
9/18/92
1435
1455
20
0.9963
764
5.03
37.0
4.764
52,961
13624
89i6
172.000
30400
15.5
342
13624
377.*
72,500
12800
6.52
14.4
58.08
120.8
23,300
9630
2.09
4.61
92.15
9.4
1.810
472
0.163
0.359
13422
52
1,001
179
0.0901
0.199
106.16
4.2
809
183
0.0728
0.160
78.12
0.0925
C..481
6.148
0.0000433
&OOOWS1
13624
5902
121.000
21400
10.9
24J)
13624
382.4
78,700
13900
7.08
15.6
58.08
142.6
29,200
12100
2.63
5.80
92.15
8.9
1,830
477
0.165
0.363
134.22
7.1
1,460
261
0.131
0289
106.16
3.8
781
177
0.0702
0.155
78.12
0.0025:
3.481
".148
0.0000433
0.0000955
13624
5284
1U.000
19600
»,99
22.0
13624
294.2
61,700
10900
5.56
122
58.08
175.5
36,900
15300
3.32
7.33
92.15
9.9
2,080
542
0.187
0.412
134.22
5.6
1,180
211
• 0.106
0233
•-- —16
4.6
966
219
0.0869
0.192
78.12
0.0025
0.481
0.148
: 0.0000433
O.OOPOVS5
N/A
N/A
135,000
23.800
12.1
26.7
N/A
N/A
71,000
12,500
6.39
14.1
N/A
N/A
29,800
12,300
2.68
5.91
N/A
N/A
1,910
497
0.171
0.378
N/A
N/A
1210
217
0.109
0240
N/A
N/A
852
193
0.0766
0.169
N/A
N/A
0.481
0.148
0.0000433
0.0000955
(continued next page)
-------
VOLATILE ORGANIC TEST RESULTS
070
MBCLO-MQ030-3a MBCLO-M0030-3b MBCLO-M0030-3c
Average
Cumene (iaopropy I benzene)
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Caleb Weight, micrograms
>ig pere^ry std. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pound* per bour
Methyiene Chloride
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Caleb Weight, microgram*
pg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilogram* per hour
pounds per hour
2-Butanone
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
(Catcb Weight, microgram*
>tg p«r dry aid. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
Cblorom ethane
3 Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
>*g per dry std. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
I odom ethane
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
>tg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
o-Xylene
Formula Weight, Ib/lb- mole
Caleb Weight, micrograms
fig per dry aid. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilogram* per hour
pounds per hour
Styrene
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Caleb Weight, micrograms
jig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pound* per hour
Isooctane
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
jtg per dry std, cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
-, pounds per hour
Chloroform
Formula Weight, Ib/lb— mote
Caleb Weight, micrograms
pg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppb by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per bour
• 66 Deg. F (20 C) — 29.92 In. Mercury
Estimated results or not detectable (underlined)
120.2
1.1
212
42.4
0.0191
0.0420
84.93
2J
424
120
0.0381
0.0840
72.11
9,0925
0.481
0.161
0.0000433
0.0800955
50.49
0.0025
9.481
0.229
0.0000433
0.0000955
141.94
0.0625
0,481
0.082
0,0000433
0.0000955
106.16
0.0625
0.481
o.io9
0.0800433
0.0000955
104.15
0.0025
$.481
O.II1
0.0000433
0.0000955
114.23
0.0025
9.481
0.101
0.0000433
0.000095$
119.38
9.0925
9,481
fl.097
0.0000433
0.0000955
120.2
0.9
185
37.0
0.0166
0.0367
84.93
0.6
123
34.9
0.0111
0.02«
72.11
0.0025
0.481
0.161
0.0000433
0.0000955
50.49
0.0025
a.4Bl
0-229
0.0000433
9.0900955
141.94
0.0025
9.481
0.982
0.0000433
0.0000955
106.16
0.2
41.1
9.31
0.00370
0.00815
104.15
0.0025
0.514
0.119
0.090046Z
0.0001019
114.23
0.0025
0.481
9.101
9.0900433
0.00009S5
119.38
0.0025
0.481
0.997
0.0000433
0.0000955
120.2
1.1
231
46.2
0.0208
0.0458
84.93
0.7
147
41.6
0.0132
0.0291 , .^r
72.11
00025
0.481
0.161
0.0000433
0.0000955
50.49
0.0025
0.481
9.229
04)00043?
0.0000915,
141.94
0.0025
0.481
9.082
0.0000433
0.0000955
106.16
0.3
63.0
14.3
0.00567
0.0125
104.15
0.4
84.0
19.4
0.00756
0.0167
114.23
0.0025
0.481
0.101
0.0000433
- 0.0000955
119.38
O.OOZ5
9,481
O.QJT
0.0000433
0.0000955
N/A
N/A
209
41.9
0.0188
0.0415
N/A
N/A
231
65.5
0.0208
., 0.0459
N/A
N/A
0.481
0.161
0.0000433
0.0000955
N/A
N/A
0.481
0.229
0.0000433
0.0000955
N/A
N/A
0.481
0.0816
0.0000433
0.0000955
N/A
N/A
34.8
7.90
0.00314
0.00691
N/A
N/A
28.3
6.54
0.00255
0.00562
N/A
N/A
0.481
0.101
0.0000433
0.0000955
N/A
N/A
0.481
0.0970
0.0000433
0.0000955
-------
71
APPENDIX^A-9
MICROBOARD SURFACE EFB INLET
-------
PARTICULATE & CONDENSIBLE PARTICULATE TEST RESULTS
072
PLANT: Weyerhaeuser Company, Moncure, NC
SAMPLING LOCATION: Surface EFti inlet
Theta
Dia
Cp
Y
Pbar
Delta H
Vm
tm
Vm(std)
Vic
Vw
%H20
Mfd
%C02
%02
%CO + N2
Md
Ms
Pg
Ps
ts
Delta-P
vs
A
Qsd
Qaw
%1
' 68 Deg. F
Test Date
Run Start & Finish Times
Net Traversing Points
Net Run Time, Minutes
Nozzle Dfameter, Inches
Pilot Tube Coefficient
Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor
Barometric Pressure, Inches Hg
Avg. Pressure Differential of
Orifice Meter, Inches H2O
Volume of Metered Gas Sample,, Dry ACF
Dry Gas Meter Temperature, Degrees F
Volume of Metered Gas Sample, Dry SCF*
Total Volume of Liquid Collected
in Impingers & Silica Gel, mL
Volume of Water Vapor, SCF*
Moisture Content, Percent by Volume
'Dry Mole Fraction
Carbon Dioxide", Percent by Volume, Dry
Oxygen, Percent by Volume, Dry
CO + N2, Percent by Volume, Dry
Gas Molecular Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole, Dry
Gas Molecular Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole, Wet
Flue Gas Static Pressure, Inches H2O
Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, Inches Hg
Flue Gas Temperature, Degrees F
Average Velocity Head, Inches HI '
Flue Gas Velocity, Feet per Second
Stack/Duct Area, Square Inches
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM*
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Wet ACFM
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, Percent
(20 C) -- 29.92 In. Mercury
MBSLI-M5/202-1
9/16/92
1221-1354
24
60
0.193
0.84
1.000
30.100
1.444
37.505
92
36.175
131.0
6.166
14.6
0.854
2.0
18.6
79.4
29.06
27.45
-1.6
29.98
_--, ^' 22T
1.4223
78.27
1,914
41,039
62,431
96.1
MBSL,.-ivI5/202-2 MBSLI-M5/202-3
9/16/92
1539-1659
24
60
0.191
0.84
1.000
30.100
r-
1.998
44.056
95
42.322
. 152.0
7.155
14.5
0.855
2.0
18.8
79.2
29.07
27.46
-1.7
29.98
224
1.9098
90.46
1,914
47,717
72,155
98.8
(continued next page)
9/17/92
839-955
24
60
0.191
0.84
1.000
30.100
1.870
42.422
83
41.684
140.0
6.590
13.7
0.863
2.0
18.9
79.1
29.08
27.56
-1.5
29.99
218
1.7591
86.27
1,914
46,349
68,812
100.1
-------
PARTICULATE & CONDENSIBLE PARTICULATE TEST RESULTS
0'
PARTICULATE RESULTS:
Filterable
mg Catch Weight, milligrams
mg/DSCM Milligrams/Dry Std. Cubic Feet*
gr/DSCF Grains per Dry Std. Cubic Foot*
kg/hr Kilograms per hour
Ib/hr Pounds per hour
Condensable — intractable
Catch Weight, milligrams
- Milligrams/Dry Std. Cubic Feet*
Grains per Dry Std. Cubic Foot*
Kilograms per hour
Pounds per hour
Condensable - Non — Extractable
Catch Weight, milligrams
Milligrams/Dry Std. Cubic Feet*
Grains per Dry Std. Cubic Foot*
Kilograms per hour
Pounds per hour
Total Paniculate
Catch Weight, milligrams
Milligrams/Dry Std. Cubic Feet*
Grains per Dry Std. Cubic Foot*
Kilograms per hour
Pounds per hour
MBSLI-M5/202-1
128.6
125.5
0.0549
8.75347
19.29821
broken
broken
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
MBSLI-M5/202-2
, 134.8
112.5
0.0492
9.11902
20.10410
18.3
15.27
0.0067
1.23797
2.72927
12.2
10.2
0.0044
0.82531
1.81951
165.3
137.9
0.0603
11.18230
24.65288
MBSLI-MS/202-3
1122
95.0
0.0415
7.48540
16.50257
24.3
20.58
0.0090
1.62117
3.57409
10.3
8.7
0.0038
0.68716
1.51494
146.8
124.4
0.0543
9.79373
21.59160
* 68 Deg. F (20 C) - - 29.92 In. Mercury
07-M«y-«3
-------
PARTICULATE & CONDENSIBLE PARTICULATE TEST RESULTS
074
PLANT: Weyerhaeuser Company, Moncure, NC
SAMPLING LOCATION: Surface EFB Inlet
TesssDate
Run Start & Finish Times
Net Traversing Points
Net Run Time, Minutes
Nozzle Diameter, Inches
Pitot Tube Coefficient
Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor
Barometric Pressure, Inches Hg
Theta
Dia
Cp
Y
Pbar
Delta H
Vm
tm
Vm(std)
Vic
Vw
%H20
Mfd
%C02
%02
Avg. Pressure Differential of
Orifice Meter, Inches H2O
Volume of Metered Gas Sample, Dry ACF
Dry Gas Meter Temperature, Degrees F
Volume of Metered Gas Sample, Dry SCF*
Total Volume of Liquid Collected
in Impingers & Silica Gel, mL
Volume of Water Vapor, SCF*
Moisture Content, Percent by Volume
Dry Mole Fraction
Carbon Dioxide, Percent by Volume, Dry
Oxygen, Percent by Volume, Dry
%CO + N2 CO + N2, Percent by Volume, Dry
Md Gas Molecular Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole, Dry
Ms Gas Molecular Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole, Wet
Pg Flue Gas Static Pressure, Ir :hes H2O
Ps^ Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, Inches Hg
ts Flue Gas Temperature, Degrees F
Delta-P Average Velocity Head, Inches H2O
vs
A
Qsd
Oaw
Flue Gas Velocity, Feet per Second
Stack/Duct Area, Square Inches
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM*
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Wet ACFM
%I Isokinetic Sampling Rate, Percent
* 68 Deg. F (20 C) - - 29.92 In. Mercury
MBSLI-MS/202-4
9-18-92
925-1052
12
60
"** 0.193
0.84
1.000
30.070
2.064
43.968
83
43.169
165.0
7.767
15.2
0.848
1.9
19.0
79". 1
29.06
27.3
-1.6
29.95
223
1.8489
89.1
1,914
46,648
71,070
100.9
Ol-Mly-93
-------
PARTICULATE & CONDENSIBLE PARTICULATE TEST RESULTS
PARTICULATE RESULTS:
Filterable
mg Catch Weight, milligrams
mg/DSCM Milligrams/Dry Std. Cubic Feet*
gr/DSCF , Grains per Dry Std. Cubic Foot*
kg/nr Kilograms per hour
Ib/hr Pounds per hour
Condensable — Ext^i^iajie
Catch Weight, milligrams
Milligrams/Dry Std. Cubic Feet*
Grains per Dry Std. Cubic Foot*
Kilograms per hour
Pounds per hour
Condensable — Non —Extractable
Catch Weight, milligrams
Milligrams/Dry Std. Cubic Feet*
Grains per Dry Std. Cubic Foot*
Kilograms per hour
Pounds per hour
Total Paniculate
Catch Weight, milligrams
Milligrams/Dry Std. Cubic Feet*
Grains per Dry Std. Cubic Foot*
Kilograms per hour
Pounds per hour
MBSL1-M5/202-4
136.2
Tr-f.'4
0.0487
8.831
19.468
48.8
39.92
0.0174
3.164
6.975
11.0
9.00
0.00393
0.713
1.572
196.0
160.3
0.0701
12.71
28.02
• 68 Deg. F (20 C) - - 29.92 In. Mercury
07-May-IJ
-------
APPENDIX A-10
MICROBOARD SURFACE EFB OUTLET (1510)
-------
ALDEHYDES/KETONES TEST RESULTS
PLANT: Weyerhaeuser Company, Moncure, NC
SAMPLING LOCATION: Microboard Surface Layer EFB Outlet (1510)
MBSLO-MOOll-l
Theta
Dia
Cp
Y
Pbar
Delta H
Vm
tm
Vm(std)
Vic
Vw
%H20
Mfd
•%C02
%02
%CO+N2
Md
Ms
Pg
Ps
•&&• -?~
is
Delta -P
vs
A
Qsd
Qaw
%I
'68Deg.F
Test Date
Run Stan & Finish Times
Net Traversing Points
Net Run Time, Minutes
Nozzle Diameter, Inches
Pilot Tube Coefficient
Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor
Barometric Pressure, Inches Hg
Avg. Pressure Differential of
Orifice Meter, Inches H2O
Volume of Metered Gas Sample, Dry ACF
Dry Gas Meter Temperature, Degrees F
Volume of Metered Gas Sample, Dry SCF*
Total Volume of Liquid Collected
in Impingers & Silica Gel, mL
Volume of Water Vapor, SCF*
Moisture Content, Percent by Volum'e
Dry Mole Fraction
Carbon Dioxide, Percent by Volume, Dry
Oxygen, Percent by Volume, Dry
CO + N2, Percent by Volume, Dry
Gas Molecular Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole, Dry
Gas Molecular Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole, Wet
Flue Gas Static Pressure, Inches H2O
Absolute Flue Gas Pre~ ,. ., I.tches Hg"
Flue Gas Temperature, Degrees F
Average Velocity Head, Inches H2O
Flue Gas Velocity, Feet per Second
Stack/Duct Area, Square Inches
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM*
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Wet ACFM
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, Percent
(20 C) — 29.92 In. Mercury
9-16-92
1143-1307
12
72
0.200
0.84
1.000
30.100
1.450
52.531
91
50.825
162.8
7.663
13.1
0.869
2.1
18.8
79.1
29.09
27.64
0.5^
30.14
226
1.4971
79.73
2,227
49,858
73,986
100.4
MBSLO-MOOll-2 MBSLO-M0011-3
9-16-92
1505-1620
12
72
0.200
0.84
1.000
30.100
1350
51.079
96
48.925
173.0
8.143
14.3
0.857
2.0
18.9
79.1
29.08
27.50
0.58
30.14
221
1.4412
78.14
2,227
48,543
72,511
99.2
(continued next page)
9-17-92
859-1016
12
72
0.200
0.84
1.000
29.000
1.432
51.691
90
48.255
144.5
6.802
12.4
0.876
1.9
19.0
79.1
29.06
27.69
0.58
29.04
215
1.4799
80.05
2,227
49389
74,283
96.2
-------
ALDEHYDES/KETONES TEST RESULTS
MBSLO-MOOll-l
Fwt
ppmvd
kg/hr
Ib/hr
EMISSION RESULTS:
FORMALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
fig per dry std. cubic meter4
.ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ACETALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
jig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ACROLEIN
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
fig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ACETONE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb— mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
>*g per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
PROPIONALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb — mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
fig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
CROTONALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb— mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
>ig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
n-BUTYRALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb — mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
fig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
METHYL LT1IYL KETONE
F^Tr;"'7_W(pight, lb/lb-mo;^
Catch Weight, micrograms
fig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
-30
975
677
0.543
0.0574
0.1265
44.1
260
181
0.0985
0.0153
0.0337
56.1
72
50.0
0.02145
0.00424
0.00934
58
788
547
0.227
0.0464
0.102
58.1
22
15.3
0.00633
0.00129
0.00285
70
64
44.5
0.01528
0.00377
0.00830
72.1
145
101
0.03361
0.00853
„„,,.-, 0.01882
72.1
7
4.86
0.001623
0.000412
0.000908
MBSLO-MOOll-2
30
2,350
1,696
1.360
0.1399
0.3084
44.1
632
456
0.2488
0.0376
0.0829
56.1
81
58.5
0.02507
0.00482
0.01063
58
980
707
0.293
0.0583
0.129
58.1
49
35.4
0.01464
0.00292
0.00643
70
76
54.9
0.01885
0.00452
0.00997
72.1
155
112
0.03732
0.00923
0.02034
72.1
43
31.0
0.01035
0.00256
0.00564
MBSLO-MOOll-3
30
717
525
0.421
0.0440
. 0..0971
44.1
217
159
0.0866
0.0133
0.0294
56.1
24
17.6
0.00753
0.00147
0.00325
58
1,000
732
0.304
0.0614
0.135
58.1
13
9.5
0.00394
0.00080
0.00176
70
37
27.1
0.00930
0.00227
0.00501
72.1
106
77.6
0.02588
0.00651
0.01435
72.1
21
15.4
0.00513
0.00129
0.00284
Estimated Catch Weight.
All catch weights are less than the minimum detection limit. Value presented calculated using 1/2 MDL for each catch.
• 68 Deg. F (20 C) - - 29.92 In. Mercury (continued next page)
-------
AJLDEHYDES/KETONES TEST RESULTS
'74
EMISSION RESULTS:
BENZALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-molc
Catch Weight, micrograms
Aig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ISOVALERALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb—mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by-volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
VALERALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb—mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
Ag per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
o-TOLUALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb —mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
m/p-TOLUALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
fj.% per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
HEXALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb—mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
2,5-DIMETHYL BENZALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb—mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
Ag per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour ..
MBSLO-M0011-1
106.1
439
305
0.0692
0.0258
0.0570
86.1
74
51.4
0.0144
0.00436
0.00960
86.1
226
157
0.0439
0.0133
0.0293
120.2
31
21.5
0.00431
0.00182
0.00402
120.2
266
185
0.0370
0.0157
0.0345
100.16
334
232
0.0557
0.0197
0.0433
134
71
49.3
0.00886
0.00418
0.00921
MBSLO-M0011-2
106.1
969
699
0.1586
0.0577
0.1272
86.1
110
79.4
0.02218
0.00655
0.01444
86.1
291
210
0.0587
0.0173
0.0382
120.2
71
51.2
0.01026
0.00423
0.00932
120.2
554
400
0.0800
0.0330
0.0727
100.16
501
362
0.0868
0.0298
0.0658
134
131
94.5
0.01697
0.00780
0.01719
MBSLO-M0011-3
106.1
357
261
0.0592
0.0219
0.0483
50
36.6
0.01022
0.00307
0.00677
86.1
329
241
0.0673
0.0202
0.0445
120.2
39
28.5
0.00571
0.00239
0.00528
1202
169
124
0.0247
0.0104
0.0229
100.16
476
348
0.0837
0.0292
0.0644
.134
110
80.5
0.01445
0.00676
> Estimated --ci:::, ;.0X.
All catch weights are less than the minimum detection limit. Value presented calculated using 1/2 MDL for each catch.
* 68 Dcg. F (20 C) - - 29.92 In. Mercury
-------
PM10 & CONDENSIBLE PARTICULATE TEST RESULTS
OB(
PLANT: Weyerhaeuser Company, Moncure, NC
SAMPLING LOCATION: Surface EFB Outlet (WEYCO LD. 1510)
MBSLO-M201A/202-2 MBSLO-M201A/202-3 MBSLO-M201A/202-4
Test Date
Run Start & Finish Times -:*^
Net Traversing Points
Theta Net Run Time, Minutes
Dia Nozzle Diameter, Inches
Cp Pitot Tube Coefficient
Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor
Pbar Barometric Pressure, Inches Hg
Delta H Avg. Pressure Differential of
Orifice Meter, Inches H2O
Vm Volume of Metered Gas Sample, Dry ACF
tm Dry Gas Meter Temperature, Degrees F
Vm(std) Volume of Metered Gas Sample, Dry SCF*
Vic Total Volume of Liquid Collected
in Impingers &. Silica Gel, mL
Vw Volume of Water Vapor, SCF*
%H20 Moisture Content, Percent by Volume
Mfd Dry Mole Fraction
%CO2 Carbon Dioxide, Percent by Volume, Dry
%O2 Oxygen, Percent by Volume, Dry
%CO+N2 CO + N2, Percent by Volume, Dry
Md Gas Molecular Weight, Lb/Lb - Mole, D ry
Ms Gas Molecular Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole, Wet
Pg Flue Gas Static Pressure, Inches H2O
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, Inches Hg
SET* Flue Gas Temperature, I? ~~rees F
Delta-P Average Velocity Head, Inches H2O
vs Flue Gas Velocity, Feet per Second
A Stack/Duct Area, Square Inches
Qsd Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM*
Qaw Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Wet ACFM
%I Isokinetic Sampling Rate, Percent
9/16/92
1225-1357
~»~T.- - 12
83.5
0.150
0.84
0.995
30.10
0.50
34.950
99
33.099
113.0
5.319
13.8
0.862
2.0
18.9
79.1
29.08
27.55
0.59
30.14
219"
1.3732
76.1
2227
47,683
70,616
104.8
9/17/92
- - -,^-*5«B^1719 _
12
93.5
0.150
0.84
0.995
30.00
0.48
38.120
88
36.657
104.0
4.895
11.8
0.882
1.9
19.0
79.1
29.06
27.75
0.59
30.04
— "" 217
1.4473
77.85
2227
49,903
72,240
99.0
9/18/92
839-1027
12
82.5
0.150
0.84
1.006
30.07
0.48
33.538
94
32.361
118.0
5.554
14.6
0.854
1.7
19.2
79.1
29.04
27.43
0.59
30.11
221
1.3359
75.39
2227
46,585
69,957
106.1
* 68 Degrees F — 29.92 Inches of Mercury (Hg). (Continued Next Page)
19-Apr-93
-------
(Difcl
PM10 & CONDENSIBLE PARTICULATETEST RESULTS
MBSLO-M201A/2D2-2 MBSLO-M201A/202-3 MBSLO-M201A/202-4
PM10 RESULTS:
ucyc Stack Gas Viscosity
Qs PM10 Flow, at Cyclone Conditions, ACFM
D50 Dia. of Particles in Cyclone, Microns
Particulate Catch.
mg < PM10, Grams
> PM10, Grams
Non— extractable Condensibles, Grams
Extractable Condensibles, Grams
PM10 Emissions:
Including extractable/non-extractable Condensibles
gr/DSCF Concentration, grains/DSCF*
kg/h=r Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Ib/hr Emission Rate, pounds/hour
Including only non-extractable Condensibles
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
Without Condensibles
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
Total Particulate Emissions (Includes PM10):
208.0
0.588
9.6
0.0032
0.0138
NA
NA
Sample
Bottle
Broken
Sample
BotUe
Broken
0.00149
0.276
0.609
Concentration, grains/DSCF* Not
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour Calculated
Emission Rate, pounds/hour ;•
Particulate Fractionation:
%>PM10 > PM10, % "Not i :
%
-------
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS TEST RESULTS
PLANT: Weyerhaeuser Company, Moncure, NC
SAMPUNG LOCATION: Surface Dryer EFB Outlet (WEYCO I.D. 1510)
Test Date
Run Start 4 Finish Times
Net Traversing Points
Theta Net Run Time, Minutes
Dia Nozzle Diameter, Inches
Cp Pitot Tube Coefficient
Y . Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor
Pbar Barometric Pressure, Inches Hg
Delta H Avg. Pressure Differential of
Orifice Meter, Inches H2O
Vm Volume of Metered Gas Sample, Dry ACF
~tm Dry Gas Moter Temperature, Degrees F
Vm(std) Volume of Metered Gas Sample, Dry SCF*
Vic Total Volume of Liquid Collected
in Impingers & Silica Gel, mL
Vw Volume of Water Vapor, SCF*
%H20 Moisture Content, Percent by Volume
Mfd Dry Mole Fraction
%CO2 Carbon Dioxide, Percent by Volume, Dry
%O2 - Oxygen, Percent by Volume, Dry
%CO+N2 CO + N2, Percent by Volume, Dry
Md Gas Molecular Weight Lb/Lb-Mole, Dry
Ms Gas Molecular Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole, Wet
Pg Flue Gas Static Pressure, Inches H2O
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, Inches Hg
=*• . "^
ts Flue Gas Temperature, Degrees F
Delta-P Average Velocity Head, Inches H2O
vs Flue Gas Velocity, Feet per Second
A Stack/Duct Area, Square Inches
Qsd Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM*
Qaw Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Wet ACFM
%l Isokinetic Sampling Rate, Percent
* 68 Deg, F (20 C) — 29.92 In. Mercury
MBSLO-M0010-1
9-17-92
1227-1509
12
144
0.200
0.84
- 1.000
30.000
1.462
105.953
106
99.395
371.0
17.463
14.9
0.851
1.9
19.0
79.1
29.06
27.41
0.58
30.04
219
1.4639
78.9
2,227
48,645
73,21 6
100.6
MBSLO-M0010-2
9-17-92
1801-2035
12
144
0.200
0.84
1.000
30.000
1.600
j,. 110.025
101
104.195
323.0
15.204
12.7
0.873
2.0
18.9
79.1
29.08
27.67
0.58
,30.04
221
1.6000
82.22
2.227
51 ,850
76,297
98.9
(continued next page)
MBSLO-M0010-3
9-18-92
1225-1508
12
144
0.200
0.84
1.000
30.000
1.600
110.82
106
104.021
271.0
12.756
10.9
0.891
2.0
18.9
79.1
29.08
27.87
0.58
ffi :-r, ---"^
30.04
215
1.6000
81.56
2,227
52,961
75,684
96.7
-------
SEMFVOLATILE ORGANICS TEST kESULTS
083
EMISSION RESULTS:
P-CYMENE
Fwt Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
yg Catch Weight, micrograms
yg/dscm jjg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppmvd ppm by volume, Dry
kg/hr kilograms per hour
Ib/hr pounds per hour
A-PINENE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight micrograms
pg per dry std. cubic meter'
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
B-PINENE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb—mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
jjg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
A-TERPINEOL
Formula Weight Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight micrograms
fjg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
MBSLO-M0010-1
134.2
132
47
0.0084
0.00388
0.00855
136.2
58,714
20,859
3.68412
1.72412
3.80105
136.2
19,109
6,789
1.19903
0.56113
, 1.23708
154.3
6793
2,413
0.37624
0.19947
0.43977
MBSLO-M0010-2
134.2
143
48
0.0087
0.00427
0.00941
136.2
48,264
16,356
2.88890
1.44104
3.17697
136.2
17,021
5,768
1.01881
0.50820
1.12040
154.3
7078
2,399
0.37397
0.21133
0.46591
MBSLO-M0010-3
134.2
138
47
0.0084
0.00422
0.00929
136.2
46,279
15,710
2.77472
1.41374
3.11679
136.2
14,395
4,886-
0.86307
0.43974
0.96947
154.3
7784
2,642
0.41195
0.23779
0.52423"
* 68 Deg. F (20 C) -- 29.92 In. Mercury
-------
VOLATILE ORGANIC TEST RESULTS
PLANT: Weyerhaeuser Company, Moncure, NC
SAMPLING LOCATION: Surface EFB Outlet (WEYCO I.D. 1510)
MBSLO-M0030-la MBSLO-M0030-lb MBSLO-M0030-1C
Test Date
Run Sun Time
Run Finish Time
Theta Net Run Time, Minutes
Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor
Pbar Barometric Pressure, mm Hg
Vm Volume of Metered Gas Sample, DAL
Im Dry Gas Meter Temperature, Degrees C
Vm(std) Volume of Metered Gas Sample, Dry SL*
Qsd Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFMf-
EMISSION RESULTS:
Fwt
ppbvd
kg/hr
Ib/br
9/17/92
A-Ptoene
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppb by volume, Dry
• kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
B-Pinene
Formula Weight, Ib/lb- mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
*tg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
Acetone
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppb by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
Toluene
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
jig per dry ltd. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
Chloromethane
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
Hg pei dry std. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
• 68 Deg. F (20 C) - - 29.92 In. Mercury
Estimated results or not delectable (underlined)
136.24
136.24
58.08
92.15
50.49
9/17/92
9/17/92
1229
1249
20
1.001
762
15.06
36.0
14343
47,900
1258
1318
20
1.001
762
15.59
40.8
14.623
47,900
1328
1348
20
1.001
762
14.62
44.8
1.3.540
47,900
136.24.
322.4
22,000
3890
1.79
3.95
136.24
142.9
9,800
1730
0.797
1.76
58.08
24.5
1,680
694
0.136
^0.301
92.15
0.9
61.5
16.1
0.00501
0.0110
50.49
0.0025
0.171
0.0815
0.0000139
0.0000307
136.24
326.1
24,100
4250
1.96
432
136.24
145.2
10,700
1890
0.871
1.92
58.08
•20.1
1,480
615
0.121
0.266
9Z15
1.7
126
32.8
0.0102
0.0225
50.49
0.0025
0.171
0.0815
0.0000139
0.0000307
N/A
N/A
23,100
4,070
1.88
4J4
N/A
N/A
10300
1,810
0.834
1.84
N/A
N/A
1580
654
0.129
0.283
N/A
N/A
93.5
24.4
0.00761
0.0168
N/A
N/A
0.171
0.0815
0.0000139
0.0000307
(continued next Page)
-------
VOLATILE ORGANIC TEST RESULTS
085
84.93
134.22
13737
m—/p-Xylene
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
Mg per dry ltd. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilogram* per hour
pounds per hour
Methytene Chloride
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
Mg per dry ltd. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilogrami per hour
pounds per hour
P-Cymene
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
Mg per dry ltd. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
poundi per hour
TrichlorofluoromeUune
Form uU Weight, Ib/lb- mok
Catch Weight, micrograms
/ig per dry ttd. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
poundi per hour
a—Hexane
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilogrami per hour
poundi per hour
Isoocune
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
- Catch Weight, micrograms
/ig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppb by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
68 Deg. F (20 C) 29.92 In. Mercury
Run 1A invalid due to tube saturation and high level analysis
Estimated results or not detectable (underlined)
MBSLO-M0030-la MBSLO-M0030-lb MBSLO-M0030-lc
106.16
86.17
114.23
106.16
0.3
20.5
4.6S
0.00167
0.00368
84.93
0.9
613
17.4
0.00501
0.0110
134.22
0.002?
0.171
0.0306
0.0000139
0.0000307
137.37
Q.Q025
0.171
0.0299
0.0000139
0.0000307
86.17
0.0025
0.171
0.0477
0.0000139
0.0000307
114.23
o:oo25
0.171
0.0360
0.0000139
0.0000307
106.16
0.0025
0.171
0.0387
0.0000139
0.0000307
84.93
0.9
663
18.8
0.00541
0.0119
134.22
2.1
155
27.8
0.0126
0.0278
137.37
0.0025
0.171
0.0299
0.0000139
Q.0000307
86.17
0.0025
0.171
0.0477
0.0000139
0.0000307
114.23
0:0025
o;i7l
0.0360
0.0000139
0.0000307
N/A
N/A
103
234
0.000842
0.00186
N/A
N/A
64.0
18.1
0.00521
0.0115
N/A
N/A
77.6
13.9
0.00632
0.0139
N/A
N/A
0.171
0.0299
0.0000139
0.0000307
N/A
N/A
0.171
0.0477
0.0000139
0.0000307
N/A
N/A
0.171
0.0360
0.0000139
0.0000307
-------
VOLATILE ORGANIC TEST RESULTS
PLANT: Weyerhaeuser Company, Moncure, NC
SAMPLING LOCATION: Surface EFB Outet fWEYCO LD. 1510)
MBSLO-M0030-2a MBSLO-M0030-2b MBSLO-M0030-2c
Test Date
Run Start Tune
Run Finish Time
Theta Net Run Time, Minutes
Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor
Pbar Barometric Pressure, mm Hg
Vm Volume of Metered Gas Sample, DAL
tm Dry Gas Meter Temperature, Degreet C
Vm(std) Volume of Metered Gas Sample, Dry SL*
Qsd Volumetric Air Flow Rale, Dry SCFM*
EMISSION RESULTS:
Fwt
ppmvd
kg/hr
Ib/hr
A—Pinene
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
j*g per dry std. cubic meter*
ppb by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
B-Pinene
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppb by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
Acetone
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, microgranu
fig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
Toluene
Formula Weight, Ib/lb- mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
fig per dry sld. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
Chloromelhane
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
fig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
• 68 Deg. F (20 C) — 29.92 In. Mercury
9/17/92
1717
1737
20
1.001
762
9.03
41.0
8.463
51,900
13624
252-5
29,800
5270
2.63
5.80
13624
98.0
11,600
2040
1.02
225
58.08
113
1360
563"
0.120
0264
92.15
0.0025
9525
0.0771
0.0000261
0.0000574
50.49
49.0
5,790
2760
0311
1.13
9/17/92
1744
1804
20
1.001
762
8.01
40.0
7.531
51,900
13624
254,6
33,800
5970
2.98
6S7
13624
95.4
12,700
2240
1.12
2.47
58.08
9.8
1300
1ms
0253
92.15
OOQ2S
0332
0.0867
0.0000293
0.0000645
50.49
0.0025
0332
0.158
0.0000293
0.0000645
(continued next Page)
9/17/92
1812
1832
20
1.001
762
821
40.0
7.719
51,900
13624
2893
37300
6620-
331
729
13624
110.8
14300
2530
126
2.79
58.08
18.1
23*0
971
0.456
92.15
1.4
181
473
0.0160
0.0353
50.49
0.0025
0324
0.154
0.0000286
0.0000630
N/A
N/A
33,700
5,950
2.97
656
N/A
N/A
12,900
2370
1.13
230
N/A
N/A
1,670
691
ff.147
0324
N/A
N/A
60.7
0.00535
0.0118
N/A
N/A
1,930
920
0.170
0375
-------
VOLATILE ORGANIC TEST RESULTS
087
m-/p-XyteBe
Formula Weight, 1Mb-mole
Caleb Weight, nkrognnu
Mg per dry ltd. cubic meter*
•«sss5»b by volume. Dry
kilogram per hour
poundi per hour
Methytene Chloride
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weighl, micrognms
/ig per dry ttd. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
P-Cymene
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrognms
/ig per dry ltd. cubic meter*
ppb by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
Chloroform
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, nucrograms
>ig per dry ltd. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
Trichlorofluoro metha ne
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
n—Hexane
Formula Weight,Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
Mg per dry ctd. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
Isooctane
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
/ig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
1,1,1 -Trichloroetbane
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppb by volume Dry
kilograms per : our
pounds per hour
• 68 Deg. F (20 C) 29.92 In. Mercury
Estimated results or not detectable (underlined)
MBSLO-M0030-2a MBSLO-M0030-2b MBSLO-M0030-2c
106.16
03
59.1
13.4
0.00521
0.0115
84.93
2.9
343
97.1
0.0302
0,0666
13422
0.00250
0332
0.0595
0.0000293
0.0000645
11938
0.00250
0332
0.0669
0.0000293
0.0000645
13737
0.00250
0332
0.0581
0:0000293
0.0000645
86.17
0.00250
0332
0.0927
0.0000293
0.0000645
11423
0.00250
-- — ' --
0.0699
O0000293
0,0000645
133.41
0.00250
0332
0.0599
0.0000293
0.0000645
106.16
0.00250
02
0.0752
0.0000293
0.0000645
84.93
0.8
106
30.1
0.00937
0.0207
13422
1.60
212
38.1
0.0187
0.0413
11938
0.00250
0332
0.066"
0.000029
0.0000645
13737 '
0.00250
0332
0.0581
0.0000293 -,
0.0000645
86.17
0.00250
0332
0.0927
0.0000293
0.0000645
11423
0.00250
no-M
J 0.0699
O0000293-
a000064S
133.41
0.00250
0332
0.0599
0.0000293
0.0000645
106.16
000250
0324
0:0734
0.0000286
0.0000630
84.93
1.0
isir-
36.7
0.0114
0.0252
13422
0.00250
0332
0.0595
0.0000293
0.0000645
11938
0.00250
0332
0.0669
0.0000293
0.0000645
13737
0.00250
0332
Q.OS81
0.0000293
0.0000645
86.17
0.00250
0332
0.0927
0.0000293
0.0000645
11423
0.00250
V „ 0332
0.0699 '""*
0.0000293
0.0000645
133.41
0.00250
vJ3Z
0.0599
0.0000293
0.000064S
N/A*
N/A
19.9
4.51
0.00176
0.00387
N/A
N/A
193
54.6
0.0170
0.0375
N/A
N/A
71.0
12.7
0.00626
0.0138
N/A
N/A
0332
0.0669
0.0000293
0.0000645
N/A
N/A
0332
0.0581
0.0000293
0.0000645
"N/A
N/A.
0332
0.0927
0.0000293
0.0000645
N/A
N/A
.0332
0.0699
0.0000293
0.0000645
N/A
N/A
0332
0.0599
0.0000293
0.0000645
-------
VOLATILE ORGANIC TEST RESULTS
PLANT: Weyerhaeuser Company, Moocurc, NC
SAMPLING LOCATION: Surface EFB Outet (WEYCOLD.1510)
MBSLO-M0030-3a MBSLO-M0030-3b MBSLO-M0030-3c
Test Date
Run Sun Time
Run Finish Time
Theia Net Run Time, Minutes
Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor
Pbar Barometric Pressure, mm Hg
Vm Volume of Metered Gas Sample, DAL
Im Dry Gas Meter Temperature, Degrees C
Vm(std) Volume of Metered Gas Sample, Dry SL*
Qsd Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM*
EMISSION RESULTS:
Fwt
Mg
ppmvd
kg/hr
Ib/hr
9/17/92
1225
1245
20
1.001
763.8
8.04
35.8
7.681
52,900
A-Pinene
FormuU Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
fig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
B-Pinene
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
^ig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppb by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
Acetone
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
Mg P" ''"' **d- cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry —
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
Toluene
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
jig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
Chloromethane
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
Hg per dry ltd. cubic meter*
ppb by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
• 68 Deg. F (20 C) — 29,92 In. Mercury
Estimated results or not detectable (underlined)
9/17/92
1250
1310
20
1.001
763.8
8.4
36.0
8.019
52.900
9/17/92
1316
1336
20
1.001
763.8
8.76
38.0
8309
52,900
13674
226.6 "
29,500
5210
2.65
5.8S.
13674
727
9,400
1660
0.845
1.86
58.08
12.6
1,640
<&Q j^rj
— U.HT" ""
0325
92.15^
0.5
65.1
17.0
0.00585
0.0129
50.49
0.0025
0301
0.1434
0.0000270
0.0000596
13674
189.8
23,700
4180 .
2.13
4.69
13674
55.4-
.6,910
1220
0.621
137
58.08
127
1,520
3^..^ 630 <7r_._
0.137
0301
92.15
03
37.4
—'^.77
0.00336
0.00741
50.49
0.0025
0301
0.1434
0.0000270
0.0000596
13674
207.9
- 25,000
4420
275
4.%
13674
60.7
7310
1290
0.657
1.45
58.08
9.4
1,130
-sun, 469
0.102
0724
92.15
0.0025
0301
0.0785
0.0000270
Q.QOOOS96
50.49
0.0025
0301
0.1434
0.0000270
o:oooos%
N/A
N/A
26,100
4.60&
234
5.17
N/A
N/A
7^70
1390
0.708
136
N/A
N/A
®~^ 1,430
593
0.129
0784
N/A
"N/A
•-^343
8.95
0.00308
0.00679
N/A
N/A
0301
0.143
0.0000270
0.0000596
(continued next Page)
-------
VOLATILE ORGANIC TEST RESULTS
089
MBSLO-MQ030-3* MBSLO-MOQ30-3b MBSLQ-M0030-3c
m— If— Xvteae
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Cilch Weight, micrograins
/ig per dry ltd. >••>>"• -"'''r*
ppb byvolum
kilograms per hour
.^•...u^icue Chloride
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrognnu
Hf pet dry ltd. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
P-Cymene
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micro grams
^g per dry ctd. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
Chloroform
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
^g per dry std. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
Trichloroflnoro methane
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
/ig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
n— Hexaae
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
fig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
Isooctane
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
HZ per dry std. cubic meter*
ppb by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
/ig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppb by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
106.16
0.0025
0301
»5- 0.0682
0.0000270
0.00005%
84.93
4.1
S34
151
0.0480
0.106
13422
1.8
234
42.0
0.0211
0.0464
11938
0.0025
0325
0.0656
0.0000293
0.000064S
13737
0.0025
0301
0.0527
0.0000270
0.0000596
86.17
0.0025
0301
0.0840
0.0000270
0.0000596
11423
0.0025
0301
0.0634
O0000270
0.0000596
133.41
0.0025
0301
0.0543
0.0000270
Q.OOOOS96
106.16
0.0025
0301
0.0682
0.0000270
0.00005%
84.93
03
37v!
10.6
0.00336
0.00741
13422
0.9
112
20.1
0.0101
0.0222
11938
,_ - 0.0025
Q312
0.0628
0.0000280
0.0000618
13737
0.0025
0301
0.0527
0.0000270
0.0000596
86.17
0:0025
0301
0.0840
0.0000270
0.0000596
11423
0.0025
0301
0.0634
^ 0.0000270
**' 0-0000596
;•,*»• 133.41
0.0025
0301
0.0543
0.0000270
0.0000596
106.16
0.0025
0301
0.0682
0.0000270
0.0000596
84.93
03
36.1
102
0.00325
0.00715
13422
12
144
25.9
0.0130
0.0286
11938
0.5
602
12.1
0.00541
0.0119
13737
0:0025
0301
0.0527
0.0000270
0.0000596
86.17
0.0025
0301
0.0840
0.0000270
0.0000596
11423
0.0025
0301
0.0634
0.0000270'
0.00005%
133.41
Q.002S
0301
0.0543
0.0000270
0.00005%
N/A
N/A
0301
0.0682
0.0000270
0.00005%
N/A
N/A
202
573
0.0182
0.0401
N/A
N/A
164
293
0.0147
0.0324
N/A
N/A
203
4.08
0.00182
0.00402
N/A
N/A
0301
0.0527
0.0000270
0.00005%
N/A
N/A
0301
0.0840
0.0000270
0.00005%
N/A
N/A
0301
0.0634
0.0000270
0.00005%
N/A
N/A
0301
0.0543
0.0000270
0.00005%
* 68 Deg. F (20 C) — 29.92 In. Mercury
Estimated results or not detectable (underlined)
-------
APPENDIX A-ll •
MICROBOARD PRESS STACK 11 (DEF-1)
-------
ALDEHYDES/KETONES TEST RESULTS
PLANT: Weyerhaeuser Company, Moncure, NC
SAMPLING LOCATION: Microboard Press Stack 11 (WEYCO I.D. DEF-1)
091
Theta
Dia
Cp
Y
Pbar
Delta H
Vm
tm
Vm(std)
Vic
Vw
%H20
Mfd
%C02
%02
%CO+N2
Md
Ms
pg
Ps
IS
Delta-P
vs
A
Qsd
Qaw
%I
*68Deg.F
N
Test Date
Run Stan & Finish Times
Net Traversing Points
Net Run Time, Minutes
Nozzle Diameter, Inches
Pilot Tube Coefficient
Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor
Barometric Pressure, Inches Hg
Avg. Pressure Differential of
Orifice Meter, Inches H2O
Volume of Metered Gas Sample, Dry ACF
Dry Gas Meter Temperature, Degrees F
Volume of Metered Gas Sample, Dry SCF*
Total Volume of Liquid Collected
in Impingers & Silica Gel, mL
Volume of Water Vapor, SCF*
Moisture Content, Percent by Volume
Dry Mole Fraction
Carbon Dioxide, Percent by Volume, Dry
Oxygen, Percent by Volume, Dry
CO + N2, Percent by Volume, Dry
Gas Molecular Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole, Dry
Gas Molecular Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole, Wet
Flue Gas Static Pressure, Inches H2O
Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, Inches Hg
Flue Gas Temperature, Degrees F
Average Velocity Head, Inches H2O
Flue Gas Velocity, F"eet psr Second
Stack/Duct Area, Square Inches
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM*
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Wet ACFM
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, Percent
(20 C) — 29.92 In. Mercury
ifBPll-MOOll-l
9-19-92
1635-1753
24
72
0.282
0.84
1.006
30.070
1.536 ..
43.685
95
42.196
34.1
1.605
3.7
0.96J
0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
28.44
-0.2
30.06
111
0.1842
25.19
855
8,028
8,978
100.0
MBP11-M0011-2
9-21-92
1810-1927
24
72
0.282
0.84
1.006
29.850
1.162 '
39.359
91
37.935
33.5
1.577
4.0
0.960
0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
28.41
-0.11
29.84
111
0.1379
21.88
855
6,906
7,798
104.5
(continued next page)
MBP11-M0011-3
9-22-92
1421-1539
24
72
0.282
0.84
1.006
29.900
1.221
40.844
97
39.050
20.1
0.946
2.4
0.976
0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
28.58
-0.11
29.89
115
0.1557
23.25
855
7,420
8,286
100.1
-------
ALDEHYDES/KETONES TEST RESULTS
MBP11-M0011-1 MBP11-M0011-2
EMISSION RESULTS:
FORMALDEHYDE
Fwt Fonnula Weight, Ib/lb-mole 30 30
fig Catch Weight, micrograms 39,743 25,207
Mg/dscm >tg per dry std. cubic meter* 33,258 23,463
ppmvd ppm by volume, Dry 26.669 18.815
kg/hr kilograms per hour 0.454 0.27533
ItVhr pounds per hour 1.0002 0.6070
ACETALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ih/lb-mole 44.1 44.1
Catch Weight, micrograms _^, 402 395
H% per dry sld. cubic meter* 336 368
ppm by volume. Dry 0.1835 02006
kilograms per hour 0.00459 0.00431
pounds Txrhtwr 0.01012 0.00951
ACROLEIN **** «•
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole 56.1 56.1
Catch Weight, micrograms 264 88
Mg per dry std. cubic meter* 221 81.9
ppm by volume, Dry 0.0947 0.0351
kilograms per hour 0.00301 0.00096
pounds per hour 0.00664 0.00212
ACETONE
Fonnula Weight, Ib/lb-mole 58 58
Catch Weight, micrograms 619 1,123
/ig per dry std. cubic meter* ,518 1,045
ppm by volume, Dry 0.2148 0.4336
kilograms per hour 0.00707 0.01227
poundsper hour 0.01558 0.02704
PROPIONALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole 58.1 58.1
Catch Weight, micrograms 25 1
Mg per dry std. cubic meter* 20.9 0.93
ppm by volume, Dry 0.00866 0.000385
kilograms per hour 0.000285 0.0000109
pounds per hour 0.000629 0.0000241
CROTONALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole 70 70
Catch Weight, micrograms 77 46
^g per dry std. cubic meter* 64.4 42.8
ppm by volume. Dry 0.0221 0.0147
kilograms per hour 0.000879 0.000502
pounds per hour 0.00194 0.00111
n-BUTYRALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole 72.1 7Z1
Catch Weight, micrograms 153 139
fig per dry std. cubic meter* 128 129
ppm by volume, Dry 0.0427 0.0432
kilograms per hour 0.00175 0.00152
pounds per hour 0.00385 0.00335
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole 72.1 72.1
Catch Weight, micrograms 5 28
Mg per dry std. cubic meter* 4.18 26.1
ppm by volume, Dry 0.00140 0.00870
kilograms per hour u, 0.0000571 0.000306
pounds per hour 0.0001258 0.000674
MBP11-M0011-3
30
37,662
34,056
27308
0.42938
0.9466
44.1
467
422.
0.2304
0.00532
0.01174
56.1
80
723
0.0310
0.00091
0.00201
58
803
726
03012
0.00915
0.02018
58.1
1
0.90
0.000374
0.0000114
0.0000251
70
45
40.7
0.0140
0.000513
0.00113
72.1
129
117
0.0389
0.00147
0.00324
72.1
27
24.4
0.00815
0.000308
0.000679
Estimated catcb weight.
All catch weight* ire less than (be minimum detection limit (MDL). Value presented calculated using UZ MDL for each catch weight
• 68 Deg. p (20 c> -- »_«? in. Mercury (continued next page)
-------
ALDEHYDES/KETONES TEST RESULTS
093
MBP11-M0011-1 MBP11-M0011-2
EMISSION RESULTS:
BENZALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole 106.1 106.1
Catch Weight, micrograms 105 116
jig per dry std. cubic meter* 87.9 108
ppm by volume, Dry 0.01992 0.02448
kilograms per hour 0.00120 0.00127
pounds per hour 0.00264 0.00279
ISOVALERALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole 86.1 86.1
Catch Weight, micrograms 106 127
Mg per dff-^.uiDic meter* 88.7 118
ppm by volume. Dry 0.02478 0.03303
kilograms per hour 0.00121 0.00139
pounds per hour 0.00267 0.00306
VALERALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-molc 86.1 86.1
Catch Weight, micrograms 150 233
jig per dry std. cubic meter* 126 217
ppm by volume, Dry 0.03507 0.06060
kilograms per hour 0.00171 0.00255
pounds per hour 0.00377 0.00561
o-TOLUALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole 1202 1202
Catch Weight, micrograms 14 7
jig per dry std. cubic meter* 11.7 6.52
ppm by volume. Dry 0.00234 0.00130
kilograms per hour 0.000160 0.0000765
pounds per hour 0.000352 0.000169
m/p-TOLUALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole 1202 1202
Catch Weight, micrograms 73 54
- jig per dry std. cubic meter* 61.1 50.3
ppm by volume, Dry 0.01223 0.01006
kilograms per hour 0.000833 0.000590
pounds per hour 0.00184 0.00130
HEXALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole 100.16 100.16
Catch Weight, micrograms 277 632
jtg per dry std. cubic meter* 232 588
ppm by volume. Dry 0.05567 0.14129
kilograms per hour 0.00316 0.00690
pounds per hour 0.00697 0.01522
2^-DIMETHYL BENZALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole 134 134
Catch Weight, micrograms 41 15
jig per dry std.-cubic meter* 343 14.0
ppm by volume, Dry 0.00616 0.00251
kilograms per hour 0.00047 0.000164
pounds per hour 0.00103 0.000361
MBP11-M0011-3
106.1
1- -
137
0.030%
0.00172
0.00380
86.1
136
123=
0.03436
0.00155
0.00342
86.1
199
180
0.05028
0.00227
0.00500
1202
16
145
0.00290
0,000182
0.000402
1202
81
732
0.01466
0.000923
0X10204
100.16
418
378
0.09078
0.00477
0.01051
134
8
723
0.00130
0.0000912
0.000201
Eilimaled calcn weigbu
All dicta weight! are (at than (be minimum detection limit (MDL). Value praented calculated using 1/2 MDL (or eacfa catch weight.
•« Dc8. p (20 C) — 29.»2 in. Mercury (continued next page)
-------
PM10 & CONDENSIBLE PARTICULATE TEST RESULTS
094
PLANT: Weyerhaeuser Company, Moncure, NC
SAMPLING LOCATION: Microboard Press Stack 11 (WEYCO I.D. DEF-1)
MBP11-M201A/202-1 MBP11-M201/
Test Date
Run Stan & Finish Times
Net Traversing Points
Theta Net Run Time, Minutes
Dia "Nozzle Diameter, Inches
Cp Pilot Tube Coefficient
Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor
Pbar Barometric Pressure, Inches Hg
Delta H Avg. Pressure Differential of
Orifice Meter, Inches H2O
Vm Volume of Metered Gas Sample, Dry ACF
tm Dry Gas Meter Temperature, Degrees F
Vm(std) Volume of Metered Gas Sample, Dry SCF*
Vic Total Volume of Liquid Collected
in Impingers & Silica Gel, mL
Vw Volume of Water Vapor, SCF*
%H20 Moisture Content, Percent by Volume
Mfd Dry Mole Fraction
%CO2 Carbon Dioxide, Percent by Volume, Dry
%O2 Oxygen, Percent by Volume, Dry
%CO+N2 CO + N2, Percent by Volume, Dry
Md Gas Molecular Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole, Dry
Ms Gas Molecular Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole, Wet
Pg Flue Gas Static Pressure, Inches H2O
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, Inches Hg
ts Flue Gas Temperature, Degrees F
D elta - P Average Velocity Head, Inches H2O
vs Flue Gas Velocity, Feet per Second
A Stack/Duct Area, Square Inches
Qsd Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM*
Qaw Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Wet ACFM
%i Isokinetic Sampling Rate, Percent
* 68 Degrees F — 29.92 Inches of Mercury (Hg). (Continued Next Page)
9/19/92
1044-1513
-^<@s25?ft i ^
221.5
0.23
0.84
1.006
30.07
0.74
103.223
98
98.927
67
3.154
3.1
0.969
0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
28.50
-0.11
30.06
113^-..-.
0.2152
27.24
855
8,713
9,708
105.5
9/21/92
902-1240
12
205
0.23
0.84
1.006
29.85
0.74
94.777
88
91.735
52
2.448
2.6
0.974
0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
28.56
-0.11
29.84
108
0.1898
25.54
855
8,223
9,102
112.0
9/22J92
906-1309
12
234.25
0.23
0.84
1.006
29.9
0.74
108.722
87
105.564
66
3.107
2.9
0.971
0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
28.53
-0.11
29.89
110
0.1910
25.65
855
8,217
9,142
112.9
19-A(>r-9S
-------
PM10 & CONDENSIBLE PARTICULATETEST RESULTS
095
MBP11-M201A/202-1 MBP11-M201 A/202-2 MBP11-M201A/202-3
ucyc
Qs
D50
mg
Gr/DSCF
Kg/Hr
Lb/Hr
PM10 RESULTS:
Stack Gas Viscosity
PM10 Flow, at Cyclone Conditions, A-CFM
Dia. of Particles in Cyclone, Microns
Paniculate Catch.
< PM10, Grams
> EM10, Grams
Non-extractable Condensibles, Grams
Extractabie Condensibles, Grams
FM10 Emissions:
Including extractable/non-extractable Condensibles
Concentration, Grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, Kiligrams/Hour
Emission Rate, Pounds/Hour
Including only non-extractable Condensibles
Concentration, Grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, Kiligrams/Hour
Emission Rate, Pounds/Hour
Without Condensibles
Concentration, Grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, Kiligrams/Hour
Emission Rate, Pounds/Hour
Total Paniculate Emissions (Includes PM10V
Concentration, Grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, Kiligrams/Hour
Emission Rate, Pounds/Hour
Fractionation:
%>PM10
>PM10,
-------
96
APPENDIX A-12
MICROBOARD PRESS STACK 12 (DEF-3)
-------
ALDEHYDES/KETONES TEST RESULTS
PLANT: Weyerhaeuser Company, Moncure, NC
SAMPLING LOCATION: Microboard Press Stack 12 (WEYCO I.D. DEF-3)
097
Theta
Dia
Cp
Y
Pbar
Delta H
Vm
tm
Vm(std)
Vic
Vw
%H20
Mfd
%CO2
%02
%CO+N2
Md
Ms
Pg
r- PS
ts
, Delta -P
vs
A
Qsd
- Qaw
%I „_.
' 68 Deg. F
Test Date
Run Start & Finish Times
Net Traversing Points
Net Run Time, Minutes
Nozzle Diameter, Inches
Pitot Tube Coefficient
Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor
Barometric Pressure, Inches Hg
Avg^ Pressure Differential of
Orifice Meter, Inches H2O
Volume of Metered Gas Sample, Dry ACF
Dry Gas Meter Temperature, Degrees F
Volume of Metered Gas Sample, Dry SCF*
Total Volume of Liquid Collected
in Impingers & Silica Gel, mL
Volume of Water Vapor, SCF'
Moisture Content, Percent by Volume
Dry Mole Fraction
Carbon Dioxide, Percent by Volume, Dry
Oxygen, Percent by Volume, Dry
CO + N2, Percent by Volume, Dry
Gas Molecular Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole, Dry
Gas Molecular Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole, Wet
Flue Gas Static Pressure, Inches H2O
Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, Inches Hg
Flue Gas Temperature, Degrees F
Average Velocity Head, Inches H2O
Flue Gas Velocity, Feet per Second
Stack/Duct Area, Square Inches
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM*
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Wet ACFM
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, Percent
* " "' V •
(20 C) — 29.92 In. Mercury
MBP12-M0011-1
9-19-92
1635-1754
24
12
0.270
0.84
1.000
30.070
2.198
56358
97
53.973
36.9
1.737
3.1
0.969
0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
28.50
-0.25
30.05
112
03521
34.84
855
11,147
12,417
100.5
MBP12-Muoll-2
9-21-92
1810-1927
24
72
0.270
0.84
1.000
29.850
2.152
53.898
95
51.416 •
37.0
1.742
3.3
0.967
0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
28.48
-0.2
29.84
112
03440
34.54
855
10,968
12310
973
(continued next page)
MBP12-M0011-3
9-22-92
1421-1539
24
72
0.270
0.84
1.000
29.900
2.256
52.293
95
49.987
30.7
1.445
2.8
0.972
0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
28.54
-0.2
T 29.89
- 116
03591
3537
855
11,214
12,606
92.5
-------
ALDEHYDES/KETONES TEST RESULTS
MBP12-M0011-1 MBP12-M0011-2 vraP12-M0011-3
098
EMISSION RESULTS:
FORMALDEHYDE
Fwt Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
fj.% ^Catch Weight, micrograms
fig/dscm jig per dry std. cubic meter"
ppmvd ppm by volume, Dry
kg/hr kilograms per hour
Ib/hr pounds per hour
ACETALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
/xg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ACROLEIN
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
Hg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ACETONE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
/xg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
PROPIONALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
pg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
CROTONALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
fj.g per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
n-BUTYRALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
jig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
METHYL ETHYL KETONP
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
fj.g per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
30
47,711
31,214
25.030
0.591
13034
44.1
517
338
0.1845
0.00641
'*"" 0.01412
56.1
136
89.0
0.0382
0.00169
0.00372
58
713
466
0.1935
0.00884
0.01948
58.1
16
10.5
0.00433
0.000198
0.000437
70
41
26.8
0.00922
0.000508
0.00112
72.1
124
81.1
0.0271
0.00154
0.00339
»«tjra
72.1
6
3.93
0.00131
0.0000744
0.000164
30
35,245
24,205
19.409
0.45111
0.9945
44.1
549
377
0.2057
0.00703
0.01549
56.1
125
85.8
0.0368
0.00160
0.00353
58
1,407
966
0.4008
0.01801
0.03970
58.1
I
0.687
0.000284
0.0000128
0.0000282
70
52
35.7
0.0123
0.000666
0.00147
72.1
182
125
0.0417
0.00233
0.00514
72.1
36
24.7
0.00825
0.000461
0.00102
30
48344
34,150
27384
0.65072
1.4346
44.1
600
424
0.2312
0.00808
0.01781
56.1
129
91.1
0.0391
0.00174
0.00383
58
876
619
02567
0.01179
0.02600
58.1
4
2.83
0.00117
0.0000538
0.000119
70
34
. 24.0
0.00825
0.000458
0.00101
72.1
128
90.4
0.0302
0.00172
0.00380
72.1
35
24.7
0.00825
0.000471
0.00104
Estimated catch weight.
All catch weights are less than the minimum detection limit (MDL). Value presented calculated using 1/2 MDL for each catch weigt
* 68 Deg. F (20 C) — 29.92 In. Mercury (continued next page)
-------
ALDEHYDES/KETONES TEST RESULTS
MBP12-MQ011-1
MBP12-M0011-2
MBP12-M0011-3
03'
EMISSION RESULTS:
BENZALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, ib/lb-mole 106.1 106.1 106.1
C.ich Weight, micrograms 118 15 183
Hi, per dry std. cubic meter* 772 l(x 129
ppm by volume, Dry 0.01750 0.02398 0.02931
kilograms per hour 0.00146 0.00197 0.00246
pounds per hour .* 0.00322 0.00435 0.00543
ISOVALERALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole 86.1 86.1 86.1
Catch Weight, micrograms 103 168 153
jig per dry std. cubic meter* 67.4 115 108
ppm by volume, Dry 0.0188 0.0322 0.0302
kilograms per hour 0.00128 0.00215 0.00206
pounds per hour 0.00281 0.00474 0.©B454
VALERALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole 86.1 86.1 86.1
Catch Weight, micrograms • 135 334 213
fj.g per dry std. cubic meter* 88 229 150
ppm by volume, Dry 0.02468 0.06409 0.04204
kilograms per hour 0.00167 0.00427 0.00287
pounds per hour 0.00369 0.00942 0.00632
o-TOLUALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole 1202 1202 1202
Catch Weight, micrograms 13 7 3
, jig per dry std. cubic meter* 8.50 - 4.81 2.12.
ppm by volume, Dry 0.00170 0.000962 0.000424
kilograms per hour 0.000161 0.0000896 0.0000404
pounds per hour 0.000355 0.000198 0.0000890
m/p -TOLU ALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole 1202 1202 1202
Catch Weight, micrograms 83 71 100
jug per dry std. cubic meter* 543 48.8 70.6
ppm by volume, Dry 0.01087 0.00976 0.01414
kilograms per hour 0.00103 0.000909 0.00135
pounds per hour - 07)0227 0.00200 0.00297
HEXALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole 100.16 100.16 100.16
Catch Weight, micrograms 316 892 495
/xg per dry std. cubic meter* 207 613 350
ppm by volume, Dry 0.04965 0.14713 0.08398
kilograms per hour 0.00392 0.01142 0.00666
pounds per hour 0.00863 0.02517 0.01469
2,5-DIMETHYL BENZALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole 134 134 134
Catch Weight, micrograms 39 24 4
fj.g per dry std. cubic meter* 255 16.5 2.83
ppm by volume, Dry ».00458 0.002% 0.000507
kilograms per hour 0.000483 0.000307 0.0000538
pounds per hour 0.00107 0.00068 0.000119
£—
Estimated catch weight.
All catch weights are less than the minimum detection limit (MDL). Value presented calculated using 1/2 MDL for each catch weight.
• 68 Deg. F (20 C) — 29.92 In. Mercury
-------
PM10 & CONDENSIBLE PARTICULATE TEST RESULTS
IOC
PLANT: Weyerhaeuser Company, Moncure, NC
SAMPLING LOCATION: Microboard Press Stack 12 (WEYCO I.D. DEF-3)
Test Date
Run Start & Finish Times
Net Traversing Points
ThetIP-'-;-- Net Run Time, Minutes
Dia Nozzle Diameter, Inches
Cp Pitof Tube Coefficient
Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor
Pbar Barometric Pressure, Inches Hg
Delta H AVE. Pressure Differential of
Orifice Meter, Inches H2O
Vm Volume of Metered Gas Sample, Dry ACF
tm Dry Gas Meter Temperature, Degrees F
Vm(std) Volume of Metered Gas Sample, Dry SCF*
Vic Total Volume of Liquid Collected
in Impingers & Silica Gel, mL
Vw Volume of Water Vapor, SCF*
%H20 Moisture Content, Percent by Volume
Mfd Dry Mole Fraction
%CO2 Carbon Dioxide, Percent by Volume, Dry
%O2 Oxygen, Percent by Volume, Dry
%CO+N2 CO + N2, Percent by Volume, Dry
Md Gas Molecular Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole, Dry
Ms Gas Molecular Weight, Lb/Lb - Mole, Wet
Pg Flue Gas Static Pressure, Inches H2O
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, Inches Hg
ts -t riue Gas Temperature, Degrees F _,
Delta-P Average Velocity Head, Inches-H2O
vs Rue Gas Velocity, Feet per Second
A Stack/Duct Area, Square Inches
Qsd Volumetric Air Row Rate, Dry SCFM*
Qaw Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Wet ACFM
%I Isokinetic Sampling Rate, Percent
* 68 Degrees F — 29.92 Inches of Mercury (Hg). (Continued Next Page)
MBP12 M201A/202 1 MBP12-M201A/202-2 MBP12-M201A/202-3
9/19/92
1041-1528
12
231.00 wr.
0.200
0.84
1.000
30.07
0.69
106.928
98
101.816
64
3.012
2.9
0.971
0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
28.53
-0.14
30.06
,, ~ 114
0.4371
38.83
855
12,426
13,839
96.6
9/21/92
858-1325
12
255.50 __
•*:•„— ' " " '
0.200
0.84
1.000
29.85
0.68
115.477
95
109.724
66
3.107
2.8
0.972
0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
28.54
-0.20
29.84
110
0.4035
37.32
855
. 11,942
13,301
97.9
9/22/92
906-1305
12
230.75
0.200
0.84
1.000
29.9
0.67
102.575
89
98.725
74
3.483
3.4
0.966
0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
28.47
-0.20
29.89
111
—0.3319
33.9
855
10,778
12,082
108.1
19- Aft- 93
-------
PM10 & CONDENSIBLE PARTICULATE TEST RESULTS
4 (\
J. W
MBP12-M201A/202-1 MBP12-M201A/202-2 MBP12-M201 A/202-3
PM10 RESULTS:
ucyc Stack Gas Viscosity
Qs PM10 Flow, at Cyclone Conditions, ACFM
D50 Dia. of Particles in Cyc. ,.,,...v,JJ.,
Particulate Catch.
mg < PM10, Grams
> PM10, Grams
Non-extractable Condensibles, Grams
Extractable Condensibles, Grams
PM10 Emissions:
Including extractable/non—extractable Condensibles
gr/DSCF Concentration, grains/DSCF*
kg/hr Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Ib/hr Emission Rate, pounds/hour
Including only non-extractable Condensibles
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
Without Condensibles
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
Total Particulate Emissions (Includes PM10):
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
Particulate Fractionation:
%>JJ'MIO >PMIO, %
%
-------
102
- APPENDIX A-13
MICROBOARD PRESS STACK 13 (DEF-5)
-------
ALDEHYDES/KETONES TEST RESULTS
PLANT: Weyerhaeuser Company, Moncure, NC
SAMPLING LOCATION: Microboard Press Stack 13 (WEYCO I.D. DEF-5)
103
Theta
Dia
Cp
Y
Pbar
Delta H
J*i "
Vm
tm
Vm(std)
Vic
Vw
%H20
Mfd
%CO2
%02
%CO+N2
Md
Ms
Pg" '"
Ps
is
Delta -P
vs
A
Qsd
Qaw
%I
* 68 Deg. F
N
Test Date
Run Stan & Finish Times
Net Traversing Points
Net Run Time, Minutes
Nozzle Diameter, Inches
Pitot Tube Coefficient
Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor
Barometric Pressure, Inches Hg
Avg. Pressure Differential of
Orifice Meter, Inches H2O
Volume of Metered Gas Sample, Dry ACF
Dry Gas Meter Temperature, Degrees F
Volume of Metered Gas Sample, Dry SCF*
Total Volume of Liquid Collected
in Impingers & Silica Gel, mL
Volume of Water Vapor, SCF*
Moisture Content, Percent by Volume
Dry Mole Fraction
Carbon Dioxide, Percent by Volume, Dry
Oxygen, Percent by Volume, Dry
CO + N2, Percent by Volume, Dry
Gas Molecular Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole, Dry
Gas Molee^r w;Mit, Lb/Lb-Mole, Wet
Flue Gas Static Pressure, Inches H2O
Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, Inches Hg
Flue Gas Temperature, Degrees F
Average Velocity Head, Inches H2O
Flue Gas Velocity, Feet per Second
Stack/Duct Area, Square Inches
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM*
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Wet ACFM
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, Percent
(20 C) — 29.92 In. Mercury
rfBP13-MOba-l
9-19-92
1635-1751
12
72
0.270
0.84
0.996
30.070
1.668
49.31
94
47.204
43.1
2.029 -
4.1
0.959
0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
28.40
-0.12
30.06
110
0.2645
30.19
855
9,597
10,760
102.1
MBP13-M0011-2
9-21-92
1810-1923
12
72
0.270
0.84
0.9%
29.850
1.614
48.625
90
46.547
32.7
1.539
3.2
0.968
0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
28.49
-0.13
29.84
109
0.2607
30
855
9,579
10,692
100.8
(continued next page)
MBP13-M0011-3
9-22-92
1421-1536
12
72
0.270
0.84
0.996
29.900
1.719
51.291
101
48.200
243
1.144
23
0.977
0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
28.59
-0.13
29.89
118
0.2819
3137
855
9,960
11,180
100.4
-------
ADLEHYDES/KETONES TEST RESULTS
MBP13-M0011-1
Fwt
Mg
Mg/dscm
ppmvd
kg/hr
Ib/hr
EMISSION RESULTS:
FORMALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
~C-atch Weight, micrograms
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volirsi?. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ACET ALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
tig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ACROLEIN
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
tig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ACETONE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
Hg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
PROPIONALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
/ig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
CROTONALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
^g per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
n-BUTYRALDEHYDE •
Formula Weight, Ib/lb — mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
/ig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm, by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb — mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
p.g per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volum'e, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
30
40,570
30,348
~- 24.335
«*•• -0.495
1.0911
44 J-
473
354
0.1930
0.00577
0.01272
56.1
129
96.5
0.0414
0.00157
0.00347
58
569
426
0.1765
0.00694
0.01530
58.1
7
5.24
^0.00217
0.0000854
0.000188
70
65
48.6
0.0167
0.000793 -
0.00175
72.1
151
113
0.0377
0.00184
0.0040
-------
ADLEHYDES/KETONES TEST RESULTS
105
EMISSION RESULTS:
BENZALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb —mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
pg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by voluujt, Dry
kilograms per iiour
pounds per hour
ISOVALERALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb—mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
fig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
VALERALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/Ib-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
o-TOLUALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catcn Weight, micrograms
Hg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
m/p-TOLUALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb —mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
Hg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
HEXALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb—mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
^g per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
?.,5-DIMETHYL BENZALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb—mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
fj.g per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
MBP13-M0011-1
106.1
107
0.01815
0.00131
0.00288
86.1
97
72.6
0.0203
0.00118
0.00261
86.1
116
86.8
0.02424
0.00142
0.00312
120.2
5
3.74
0.000749
0.0000610
0.000134
120.2
20
15.0
0.00299
0.000244
0.000538
100.16
245
183
0.04402
0.00299
0.00659
134
14
10.5
0.00188
0.000171
0:000377
MBP13-M0011-Z
106.1
143
108
0.02460
0.00177
0.00389
86.1
129
97.9
0.0273
0.00159
0.00351
86.1
280
212
0.05935
0.00346
0.00762
120.2
3
2T.28
0.000455
0.0000370
0.0000817
120.2
71
53.9
0.01078
0.000877
0.00193
100.16
666
505
0.12134
0.00822
0.01813
134
65
49.3
0.00885
0.000803
0.001769
MBF13-M0011-3
106.1
171
125
U.02840
0.00212
0.00467
86.1
120
87.9
0.0246
0.00149
0.00328
86.1
142
104
0.02907
0.00176
0.00388
120.2
14
10.3
0.00205
0.000174
0.000383
120.2
96
70.3
0.01408
0.00119
0.00262
100.16
370
271
0.06510
0.00459
0.01011
134
63
46.2
0.00829
0.000781
0.001722
Estimated catch weight
All catch weighti are leu than the minimum detection limit (MDL). Value pretented calculated uiing 1/2 MDL for each catch weight.
* W Deg. f (20 C) — 29.92 In. Mercury
-------
PM10 & CONDENSIBLE PARTICULATETEST RESULTS
106
PLANT: Weyerhaeuser Company, Moncure, NC
SAMPLING LOCATION: Microboard Press Stack 13 (WEYCO LD. DBF-5)
Test Date
Run Start & Finish Times
i4et Traversing Points
Net Run Time, Minutes
Nozzle Diameter, Inches
Pitot Tube Coefficient
Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor
Barometric Pressure, Inches Hg
Theta
Dia
Cp
Y
Pbar
Delta H
Vm
tm
Vm(std)
Vic
Vw
%H20
Mfd
%CO2
%O2
%CO+N2
Md
Ms
Pg
Ps
ts
Delta-P
vs
A
Qsd
Qaw
Avg. Pressure Differential of
Orifice Meter, Inches H2O
Volume of Metered Gas Sample, Dry ACF
Dry Gas Meter Temperature, Degrees F
Volume of Metered Gas Sample, Dry SCF*
Total Volume of Liquid Collected
in Impingers & Silica Gel, mL —
Volume of Water Vapor, SCF*
Moisture Content, Percent by Volume
Dry Mole Fraction
Carbon Dioxide, Percent by Volume, Dry
Oxygen, Percent by Volume, Dry
CO + N2, Percent by Volume, Dry
Gas Molecular Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole, Dry
Gas Molecular Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole, Wet
Flue Gas Static Pressure, Inches H2O
Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, Inches Hg
Flue Gas Temperature, Degrees F
Average Velocity Head, Inches H2O
Flue Gas Velocity, Feet per Second
Stack/Duct Area, Square Inches
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM*
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Wet ACFM
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, Percent
MBP13-M201. =-1 MBP13-M201 A/202-2 MBP13-M201A/202-3
9/19/92
1020-1518
12
248.13
0.200
0.84
0.9961
30.07
0.64
111.118
94
106.069
71
3.342
3.1
0.969
0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
28.5IT - •
-0.13
30.06
112
0.3017
32.23
855
10,322
11,487
112.8-
9/21/92
858-1301
.^, 12
238.00
0.200
0.84
0.9961
29.85
0.65
108.619
90
103.756
56
2.636
2.5
0.975
0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
28.57
-0.13
29.84
108
0.3163
32.95
855
10,624
11,743
111.7
9/22/92
904-1258
12
, 224.50
0.200
0.84
0.9961
29.9
0.65
-104.58
89
100.185
67
3.154
3.1
0.969
0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
28.50
-0.13
29.89
t .' ~"
0.2910
31.73
855
10,112
11,309
118.1
• 68 Degrees F - - 29.92 Inches of Mercury (Hg). (Continue- ,, ^."t uew;
-------
PM10 & CONDENSIBLE PARTICULATE TEST RESULTS
107
MBP13-M201A/202-1 MBP13-M201A/202-2 MBP13-M201A/202-3
ucyc
Qs
D50
mg
gr/DSCF
kg/hr
Ib/hr
"%>PM10
% PM10, Grams
Non-extractable Condensibles, Grams
Extractable Condensibles, Grams
PM10 Emissions:
Including extractable/non-extractable Condensibles
Concentration, grains/DSCE?
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
Including only non—extractable Condensibles
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
Without Condensibles
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
Total Paniculate Emissions (Includes PM10):
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
^articulate Fractionation:
> PM10, %
187.6
0.476
9.9
0.0012
0.0052
0.0135
0.0071
0.00317
0.127
0.281
0.00214
0.0858
0.189
0.000175
0.00700
0.0154
0.00393
0.158
0.347
. 19.'
-" 80.7
188.9
0.482
9.9
0.0019
0.0081
0.0137
0.0029
0.00275
0.114
0.250
0.00232
0.0958
0.211
0.00028
0.0117
0.0257
0.00396
0.163
0.360
30.5
69.5
188.9
0.490
9.8
0.0075
0.0040
0.0059
0.0024
0.00243
0.0957
0.211
0.00206
0.0811
0.179
0.00116
0.0454
0.100
0.00305
0.120
0.264
20.2
79.8
* 68 Degrees F 29.92 Inches of Mercury (Hg).
-------
108
APPENDIX A-14
MICROBOARD COOLING ROOM 14 (DEF-7)
-------
ALDEHYDES/KETONES TEST RESULTS
109
PLANT: Weyerhaeuser Company, Moncure, NC
SAMPLING LOCATION: Microboard Cooling Room Stack 14 (WEYCO I.D. DEF-7)
Test Date
Run Start & Finish Times
Net Traversing Points
Net Run Time, Minutes
Nozzle Diameter, Inches
Pitot Tube Coefficient
Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor
Barometric Pressure, Inches Hg
Theta
Dia
Cp
Y
Pbar
Delta H
Vm
tm
Vm(std)
Vic
Vw
%H20
Mfd
%CO2
%02
%CO + N2
Md
Ms
''Pg- -^-^..^
Ps
ts
Delta-P
vs
A
Qsd
Qaw
Avg. Pressure Differential of
Orifice Meter, Inches H2O
Volume of Metered Gas Sample, Dry ACF
Dry Gas Meter Temperature, Degrees F
Volume of Metered Gas Sample, Dry SCF*
Total Volume of Liquid Collected
in Impingers & Silica Gel, mL
Volume of Water Vapor, SCF*
Moisture Content, Percent by Volume
Dry Mole Fraction
Carbon Dioxide, Percent by Volume, Dry
Oxygen, Percent by Volume, Dry
CO + N2, Percent by Volume, Dry
Gas Molecular Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole, Dry
Gas Molecular Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole, Wet
Flue Gas Static Pressure, Inches H2O
Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, Inches Hg
Flue Gas Temperature, Degrees F
Average Velocity Head, Inches H2O
Flue Gas Velocity, Feet per Second
Stack/Duct Area, Square Inches
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM*
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Wet ACFM
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, Percent
MBCR14-M0011-1
9-22-92
1733-1900
12
84
0.200
0.84
0.996
29.900
1.097
48.177
101
45.218
32.9
1.549
3.3
0.967
0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
28.48
-0,1
29.89
127
0.6119
46.65
855
14,442
16,626
101.5
MBCR14-M0011-2
9-22-92
1931-2059
12
84
0.212
0.84
0.996
29.900
1.390
53.932
96
51.110
33.8
1.591
3.0
0.970
0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
28.51
-0.1
29.89
123
0.6798
48.96
855
15,322
17,449
, 96.2
MBCR14-M0011-3
9-22-94
753-937
12
84
0.212
0.84
0.996
30.020
1.515
56.244
68
56.350
16.1
0.758
1.3
0.987
0.0
20.9
79.1
28^84
28.70
-0.1
30.01
103
0.7236
49.39
855
16,343
17,603
99.5
* 68 Deg. F (20 C) - - 29.92 In. Mercury
(continued next page)
-------
ALDEHYDES/KETONES TEST RESULTS
EMISSION RESULTS:
FORMALDEH\T3
Fwt Formula Weight, Ib/Ib-mole
• g Catch Weight, micrograms
iig/dscm fig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppmvd -.-- ,1pm by volume, Dry
kg/hr ~ ^.,-jgrams.pcr hour
Ib/hr pounds per hour
ACETALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Ci«!cb"'":™M, raicroerams
fig per dry siu. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ACROLEIN
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
tig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ACETONE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb —mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
fig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
PROPIONALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
fig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms .per hour
pounds per hour
CROTONALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb —mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
fig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
n-BUTYRALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb—mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
fig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
METHYL ETHYL KETO:,'"
Formula Weight, Ib/lb —mole
CaiL.. weight, micrograms
tig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
MBCR14-M0011-1
30
9,875
7,711
6.184
0.189
0.4172
44.1
209
163
0.0890
0.00401
0.00883
56.1
54
42.2
0.0181
0.00103
0.00228
58
369
288
0.1195
0.00707
0.01559
58.1
1
0.781
0.000323
0.0000192.
0.0000422
70
24
18.7
0.00644
0.000460
0.00101
7Z1
63
49.2
0.0164
0.00121
0.00266
72.1
13
10.2
0.00339
0.000249
0.000549
MBCR14-M0011-Z
30
9,765
6,746
5.410
0.17564
0.3872
44.1
215
149
0.0810
0.00387
0.00853
56.1
54
37.3
0.0160
0.000971
0.00214
58
308
213
0.0883
0.00554
0.01221
58.1
-2.
0.000572
0.0000360
0.0000793
70
53
36.6
0.0126
0.000953
0.00210
72.1
109
75.3
0.0251
0.001%
0.00432
72.1
25
17.3
0.00576
0.000450
0.000991
MBCR14-M0011-3
30
8,119
5,088
4.080
0.14128
0.3115
44.1
236
148
0.0807
0.00411
0.00905
56.1
53
33.2
0.0142
0.000922
0.00203
58
270
169
0.0702
0.00470
0.01036
58.1
22
13.8
0.00571
0.000383
0.000844
70
44
27.6
0.00948
0.000766
0.00169
72.1
90
56.4
0.0188
0.00157
0.00345
72.1
18
11.3
0.00376
0.000313
0.000691
Estimated catch weight
All catch weighu are lest than the minimum detection limit (MDL). Value presented calculated wing 1/2 MDL for each catch weight
' 68 Deg. P (20 C) — 29.92 In. Mercury (continued next page)
l«-A?r-«J
-------
ALDEHYDES/KETONES TEST RESULTS
EMISSION RESULTS:
:3ENZALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb — mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
pg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ISOVALERALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/Ib-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
VALERALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
tig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
o-TOLUALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
m/p-TOLUALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb —mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
/ig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
HEXALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
Mg per dry std. cubic meier*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
2,5-DIMETHYL BENZALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb—mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
jig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
MBCR14-M0011-1
106.1
68
53.1
0.01204
0.00130
0.00287
86.1
51
39.8
0.01113
0.00097T
0.00215
86.1
73
57.0
0.01593
0.00140
0.00308
120.2
9
7.03
0.00141
0.000172
0.000380
120.2
31-
24.2
0.00484
0.000594
0.00131
100.16
170
133
0.03188
0.00326
0.00718
134
4
3.12
0.000561
0.0000767
0.000169
MBCR14-M0011-2
106.1
78
53.9
0.01222
0.00140
0.00309
86.1
-..-. 73
50.4
0.01409
0.00131
0.00289
86.1
92
63.6
0.01776
0.00165
0.00365
120.2
2.76
0.000553
0.0000719
0.000159
120.2
36
24.9
0.00498
0.000648
0.00143
100.16
174
120
0.02887
0.00313
0.00690
134
32
22.1
0.00397
0.000576
0.00127
MBCR14 - M0011 - 3
106.1
56
35.1
0.00796
0.000974
0.00215
86.1
60
37.6
0.01050
0.00104
0.00230
86.1
85
53.3
0.01488
0.00148
0.00326
120.2
4
2.5
0.00050
0.000070
0.000153
120.2
29
18,2
0.00364
0.000505
0,00111
100.16
178
112
0.02679
0.00310
0.00683
134
11
6.89
0.00124
0.0001P1
0.000422
Estimated catch weight
Ali catch weighti are leu than the minimum detection limit (MDL). Value proented calculated uiing 1/2 MDL for each catch weight.
1 68 Dcg. F (20 C) - - 29.92 In. Mercury
l'-A»r-9J
-------
PM10 & CONDENSIBLE PARTICULATE TEST RESULTS
PLANT: Weyerhaeuser Company, Moncure, NC
SAMPLING LOCATION: Microboard Cooling Room Stack 14 (WEYCO I.D. DEF-7)
112
Test Date
Run Start & Finish Times
Net Traversing Points ->*»-
Theta Net Run Time, Minutes
Dia Nozzle Diameter, Inches
Cp Pilot Tube Coefficient
Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor
Pbar Barometric Pressure, Inches Hg
Delta H Avg. Pressure Differential of
Orifice Meter, Inches H2O
Vm Volume of Metered Gas Sample, Dry ACF
tm Dry Gas Meter Temperature, Degrees F
Vm(std) Volume of Metered Gas Sample, Dry SCF*
Vic Total Volume of Liquid Collected
in Impingers & Silica Gel, mL
Vw Volume of Water Vapor, SCF*
%H20 Moisture Content, Percent by Volume
Mfd Dry Mole Fraction
%CO2 Carbon Dioxide, Percent by Volume, Dry
%O2 Oxygen, Percent by Volume, Dry
%CO+N2 CO + N2, Percent by Volume, Dry
Md Gas Molecular Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole, Dry
Ms Gas Molecular Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole, Wet
Pg Flue Gas Static Pressure, Inches H2O
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, Inches Hg
ts Flue Gas Temperature, Degrees F
Delta - P Average Velocity Head, Inches H2O
vs Flue Gas Velocity, Feet per Second
A Stack/Duct Area, Square Inches
Qsd Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM*
Qaw Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Wet ACFM
%I Isokinetic Sampling Rate, Percent
MBCR14-M201A/202-1
9[23/92
1055-1459
12
230.25
0.164
0.84
0.996
30.02
0.63
102.136
79
100.138
32
1.506
1.5
0.985
0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
28.68
-0.33
107
0.6668
47.59
855
15,608
16,961
112.8
68 Degrees F - - 29.92 Inches of Mercury (Hg). (Continued Next Page)
IS-Apr-93
-------
PM10 & CONDENSIBLE PARTICULATETEST RESULTS
113
PM10 RESULTS:
ucyc Stack Gas Viscosity
Qs PM10 Flow, at Cyclone Conditions, ACFM
D50 Dia. of Particles in Cyclone, Microns
Paniculate Catch.
mg < PM10, Grams
> PM10, Grams
Non-extractable Condensibles, Grams
Extractable Condensibles, Grams
PM10 Emissions:
Including extractable/non-extractable Condensibles
gr/DSCF Concentration, grains/DSCF*
kg/hr Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Ib/hr Emission Rate, pounds/hour
Including only non-extractable Condensibles
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
Without Condensibles
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
Total Paniculate Emissions (Includes PM10):
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
Paniculate Fractionation:
%>PM10 > PM10, %
%
-------
114
APPENDIX A-15
MICROBOARD COOLING ROOM 15 (DEF-8)
-------
ALDEHYDES/KETONES TEST RESULTS
115
PLANT: Weyerhaeuser Company, Moncure, NC
SAMPLING LOCATION: Microboard Cooling Room Stack 15 (WEYCO I.D.
fist Date
Run Start & Finish Times
Net Traversing Points
Net'Ruri Time, Minutes
Nozzle Diameter, Inches
Pitot Tube Coefficient
Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor
Barometric Pressure, Inches Hg
DEF-8)
"Theta „
Dia
Cp
Y
Pbar
Delta H
Vm
tm
Vm(std)
Vic
Vw
%H20
Mfd
%CO2
%O2
%CO + N2
Md
Ms
Pg
Ps
ts ••-•*
Delta-P
vs
A
Osd
Oaw
Avg. Pressure Differential of
Orifice Meter, Inches H2O
Volume of Metered Gas Sample, Dry ACF
Dry Gas Meter Temperature, Degrees F
Volume of Metered Gas Sample, Dry SCF*
Total Volume of Liquid Collected
in Impingers & Silica Gel, mL
Volume of Water Vapor, SCF*
Moisture Content, Percent by Volume
Dry Mole Fraction
Carbon Dioxide, Percent by Volume, Dry
Oxygen, Percent by Volume, Dry
CO + N2, Percent by Volume, Dry
Gas Molecular Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole, Dry
Gas Molecular Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole, Wet
Flue Gas Static Pressure, Inches H2O
Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, Inches Hg
Flue Gas Temperature, Degrees F
Average Velocity Head, Inches H2O
Flue Gas Velocity, Feet per Second
Stack/Duct Area, Square Inches
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM*
Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Wet ACFM
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, Percent
3CR1.J .-_ . ii-^i -
9-22-92
1733-1900
24
84
0.201
0.84
1.000
29.900
1.110
45.875
100
43.332
27.5
1.294
2.9
0.971
0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
28.53
-o-i
29.89
128
0.6293
47.29
855
14,692
16,854
94.6
MBCR15-M0011-2
9-22-92
1931-2059
24
84
0.200
0.84
1.000
29.900
1.310
48.436
96
46.113
31.6
1.487
3.1
0.969
0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
28.50
y
-0.1
29.89
123
0.7334
50.89
855
15,893
18,137
94.0
MBCR15-M0011-3
9-24-92
753-927
24
84
0.200
0.84
1.000
30.020
1.349
50.299
67
50.717
10.6
"=?
0.0
1.000
0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
28.84
-0.1
30.01
104
0.7696
50.85
855
17,020
18,123
96.6
• 68 Deg. F (20 C) - - 29.92 In. Mercury
(continued next page)
-------
ALDEHYDES/KETONES TEST RESULTS
116
EMISSION RESULTS:
FORMALDEHYDE
Fwt Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
ng Catch Weight, tnicrograms
>ig/dscm fig per dry std. cubic r^'/rr'
ppmvd ppm by volume, Drj
kg/hr kilograms per hour
Ib/Br r_ ... "-•-..: : i.rijour
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-molc
Catch Weight, micrograms
jig per dry ltd. cubic meter"
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ACROLEIN
Formula Weight, Ib/lb— mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
Atg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ACETONE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb— mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
jig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
PROPIONALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb— mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
jig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume. Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
CROTONALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb— mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
jig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
n - BUTYRALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb— mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
jig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb— mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
jig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
MBCR15-M0011-1
30
9,486
7,730
_
0.193
0.4254
44.1
221
180
0.0982
a00450
0.00991
56.1
75
61.1
0.0262
0.00153
0.00336
58
408
332
0.1379
0.00830
0.01830
58.1
2
L63
0.000675
0.0000407
0.0000897
70
57
46.4
0.0160
0.00116
0.00256
72.1
114
92.9
0.0310
0.00232
0.00511
'^ 72.1
20
16.3
0.00544
0.000407
0.000897
MBCR15-M0011-Z
30
8,758
6,706
5378
0.18111
0.3993
44.1
189
j$5
0.0789
0.00391
0.00862
56.1
53
40.6
0.0174
0.00110
0.00242
58
279
214
0.0886
0.00577
0.01272
58.1
1
2/77
0.000317
0.0000207
0.0000456
70
52
39.8
0.0137
0.00108
0.00237
72.1
98
75.0
0.0250
0.00203
0.00447
-------
ALDEHYDES/KETONES TEST RESULTS
17
EMISSION RESULTS:
BENZALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb— mole
Caleb Weight, micrograms
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
ISOVALERALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb— mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
pom by volume, Dry
Kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
VALERALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
u'i per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
o-TOLUALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
Mg per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
m/p-TOLUALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb-mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
/ig per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
HEXALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb— mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
jug per dry std. cubic meter*
ppm by volume, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
2,5-DIMETHYL BENZALDEHYDE
Formula Weight, Ib/lb— mole
Catch Weight, micrograms
/ig per - -v std. cubic meter*
ppm by 'Olumc, Dry
kilograms per hour
pounds per hour
MBCR15-M0011-1
106.1
79
64.4
0.01460
0.00161
0.00354
86.1
78
63.6
0.01776
0.00159
0.00350
86.1
96
78.2
0.02186
0.00195
0.00431
120.2
2
1.63
0.000326
0.0000407
0.0000897
120.2
38
31.0
0.00620
0.000773
0.00170
100.16
205
167
0.04012
0.00417
0.00919
134
15
12.2
0.00219
0.000305
0.000673
MBCK15-MOOT1-2
106.1
70
53.6
0.01215
0.00145
0.00319
86.1
65
49.8
0.01391
0.00134
0.002%
86.1
123
94.2
0.02632
0.00254
0.00561
120.2
4
3.06
0.000613
0.0000827
0.000182
120.2
31
23.7
0,00475
^0.000641
* 0,00141
100.16
154
118
0.02832
0.00318
0.00702
134
9
6.89
0.00124
0.000186
0.000410
MBCR15-MOO11-3
106.1
"•A
37.6
0.00852
0.00109
0.00240
86.1
61
42.5
0.01187
0.00123
0.00271
86.1
86
59.9
0.01673
0.00173
0.00382
120.2
3
2.09
0.000418
0.0000604
0.000133
120.2
28
19.5
0.00390
0.000564
0.00124
100.16
164
114
0.02742
0.00330
0.00728
134
13
9.05
0.00162
0.000262
0.000577
Fflimatfd catch weight.
All catch weight* are lea than the minimum detection limit (MDL). Value presented calculated using 1/2 MDL for each catch weight
• 68 Deg. F (20 C) - - 2952 In. Mercury (continued next page)
19-Aft-*!
-------
PM10 & CONDENSIBLE PARTICULATETEST RESULTS
118
PLANT: Weyerhaeuser Company, Moncure, NC
SAMPLING LOCATION: Microboard Cooling Room Stack 15 (WEYCO I.D. DEF-8)
Test Date
Run Start & Finish Times
Net Traversing Points
Theta Net Run Time, Minutes
Dia Nozzle Diameter, Inches
Cp Pitot Tube Coefficient
Y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor
Pbar Barometric Pressure, Inches Hg
Delta H Avg. Pressure Differential of
Orifice Meter, Inches H2O
Vm Volume of Metered Gas Sample, Dry ACF
tm Dry Gas Meter Temperature, Degrees F
Vm(std) Volume of Metered Gas Sample, Dry SCF*
Vic Total Volume of Liquid Collected
in Impingers & Silica Gel, mL
Vw Volume of "Water Vapor, SCF*
%H20 Moisture Content, Percent by Volume
Mfd Dry Mole Fraction
%CO2 Carbon Dioxide, Percent by Volume, Dry
%O2 Oxygen, Percent by Volume, Dry
%CO + N2 CO + N2, Percent by Volume, Dry
Md Gas Molecular Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole, Dry
Ms Gas Molecular Weight, Lb/Lb-Mole, Wet
Pg Flue Gas Static Pressure, Inches H2O
Ps Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, Inches Hg
ts F!"«^ Gas Temperature, Degrees F
r -l:a- P Average Velocity Head, Inches H2O
vs Flue Gas Velocity, Feet per Second
A Stack/Duct Area, Square Inches
Qsd Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Dry SCFM*
Qaw Volumetric Air Flow Rate, Wet ACFM
%I Isokinetic Sampling Rate, Percent
MBCR15-M201A/2o~ i
9/23/92
1055-1502
* 12 C
232.75
0.165
0.84
1
30.02
0.66
103.245
77
101.894
42
1.977
1.9
0.981
0.0
20.9
79.1
28.84
28.63
-0.33
30.00
109
0.7561
50.82
855
16,536
18,112
105.9
* 68 Degrees F — 29.92 Inches of Mercury (Hg). (Continued Next Page)
19-Apr-1*
-------
PM10 & CONDENSIBLE PARTICULATE TEST RESULTS
119
ucyc
Qs
D50
mg
gr/DSCF
kg/hr
Ib/hr
%>PMiO*
PM10 RESULTS:
Stack Gas Viscosity
PM10 Flow, at Cyclone Conditions, ACFM
Dia of Particles in Cyclone, Microns
Particulate Catch.
< PM10, Grams
> PM10, Grams '
Non-extractable Condensibles, Grams
Retractable Condensibles, Grams
PM10 Emissions:
Including extractable/non-extractable Condensibles
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
Including only non-extradtable Condensibles
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
Without Condensibles
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
Total Particulate Emissions (Includes PM10):
Concentration, grains/DSCF*
Emission Rate, kilograms/hour
Emission Rate, pounds/hour
Particulate Fractionation:
> PM10, %
< PM10, %
MBCR15-M201 A/202-1
188.5
0.480
9.9
t'
0.0014
0.0049
0.0007
0.0004
0.000379
0.0243
0.0536
0.000318
0.0204
0.0450
0.000212
0.0136
0.0300
0.00112
0.0720
0.159
66.2
33.8
* 68 Degrees F — 29.92 Inches of Mercury (Hg).
19-Apr-SB
-------
120
APPENDIX A-16
CONTINUOUS EMISSIONS MONITORING DATA
FOR ALL LOCATIONS
-------
EPA/EMB - WEYERHAEUSER - MONCURE, NC
S MMARY OF TOTAL HYDROCARBON DATA FROM MDF PRESS VENTS
DATE
1 1 SEP 92
12 SEP 92
12 SEP 92
12 SEP 92
12 SEP 92
12 SEP 92
13 SEP 92
13 SEP 92
25 SEP 92
25 SEP 92
25 SEP 92
T1H : I \
1934 00 ;
0828-1012
1211-1335
1231 1253
1335-1446
1753-2038
0830-ia.2
1249-1,33
1255-1458
1540-1742
1824-2018
RUN NUMBER MDF 1
THC
(ppm)(1)
ONE
TWO
THREE A
THREE B (3)
THREE C(4)
FOUR
FIVE
SIX
ONE 10.4
TWO 11.8
THREE 10.3
MDF 2 MDF3 MDF-4
THC THC THC
(ppm)(l) (ppm)(I) (ppm)(l)
24.6 32.7
18.1 9.2 <:>
17.4 26.3
101 156
16.9 256
4.5
3.5
4.7
.
V >F-5 MDF-6
': 1C THC
(Pi Test run invalid, condensable rn,aterial on filter produced high bias.
(3) Data represenu the time period when the press was only loaded every other cycle.
(4) Run THREE C run to replace i valid data of run two.
02-Nov-«
-------
EPA/EMB - WEYERHAEUSER - MONCURE, NC
k JMMARY OF TOTAL HYDROCARBON, OXIDES OF NITROGEN, AND CARBON
MONOXIDE DATA FROM THE MICROBOARD CORE PARTICLE DRYER
DATE
TIME
RUN NUMBER
EFBINLET
THC
(ppm)(l)
EFB OUTLET
THC
(ppm)'"
EFB OUTLET
•NO,
(ppm)<»
EFB OUTLET
CO
14 SEP 92
15 SEP 92
15 SEP 9
15 SEP 92
15 SEP 92
1723-1852
0930-1130
1407-1507
1648-1748
1900-2000
ONE
TWO
THREE
FOUR
FIVE
343.7
352.9
312.7
323.2
459.5 '
212.5
299.6
244.7
259.5
351.8
59.6
97.7
61.0
„ 58.7
50.9
189.5
231.5
220.1
"> ppm as propane, wet basil, <
reported on a dry basis. '"'
02-Nov-9J
ro
ro
-------
EPA7EMB - WEYERHAEUSER - MONCURE, NC
SUMMARY OF TOTAL HYDROCARBON, OXIDES OF NITROGEN, AND CARBON
PIONOXIDE DATA FROM THE MICROBOARD SURFACE PARTICLE DRYER
DATE
16 SEP 92
16 SEP 92
1.7 SEP 92
TIME
1145-1330
1518-1630
0840-1' 30
RUN NUMBER
ONB
TWO
THREE
EFB INLET
THC
(ppm)™
43.2
50.5
24.4
EFB OUTLET
THC
(ppm)<'>
364
34.1
20.8
EFB OUTLET
NOK
* (ppm)(1>
39.0
36.7
33.8
EFB OUTLET
CO
(ppm)<»
92.0
174.2
45.8
<" ppm at propone, wet basis.
-------
EPA/EMB - WEYERHAEUSER - MONCURE, NC
SUMMARY OF TOTAL HYDROCARBON DATA FROM THE
' MICROBOARD PRESS ROOM EXHAUST
DATE
TIME
RUN NUMBER
MPRE-11A
THC
(ppm)(1)
MPRE-HB
THC
(ppm)
MPRE-12A
THC
MPRE-12B
THC
MPRE-13A
THC
MPRE-13B
THC
(ppm)"»
19 SEP 92
19 SEP 92
19 SEP 92
19 SEP 92
21 SEP 92
21 SEP 92
21 SEP 92
21 SEP 92
22 SEP 92
22 SEP 92
0900-1000
1022-1129 ;;;
1224-1450
1505-1800
0900-1200
1210-1328
1345-14 >
1900-2C 'j
0748- 11 10
f\
1352-1545 W
ONE
TWO
THREE
FOUR
FIVE
SKA
SKB
SEVEN
EIGHT
NINE
39.8
38.7
32.8
45.6
32.0
48.4
32.8
34.0
22.3
22.8
28.5
28.0
30.6
31.6
21.5
20.8
27.4
27.0
33.0
29.6
13.7
39.3
519
33.8
47.3
25.0
29.8
25.2
39.7
ppm is propane, wet basis.
ro
W-Nov-91
C: Vnonc urcNmproium- w ItJ
-------
EPA/EMB - WEYERHAEUSER - MONCURE, NC
SUMMARY OF TOTAL HYDROCARBON DATA FROM THE
MICROBOARD COOLING ROOM EXHAUST
DATE
TIME
RUN NUMBER
MCRE-14
THC
(ppm)(l)
MCRE-1S
THC
22 SEP 92
22 SEP 92
1733-1900
1900-2105
ONE
TWO
14.5
13.5
14.6
10.4
ppm as propane, wet basil.
ro
en
02-Nov-92
-------
APPENDIX A-17
EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS
-------
CONSTANTS, DEFINITIONS, NOMENCLATURE, AND UNITS OF MEASURE
»
F~*. TSOKINETIC AND DRY GAS METER CONSTANT RATE SAMPLING
A
avg
%CO2
%CO + N2
Cp
Delta H
Delta P
Dso
Fwt
Gr/DSCF
Hg
H2O
%H2O
%I
Lb/Hr
Kg/Hr
Mfd
Md
Ms
mg
mg/DSCM
%O2
Pbar
Stack cross-sectional area, square feet
Average
Percent carbon dioxide by volume (dry basis) "
v
^
Percent carbon monoxide & nitrogen by volume (dry basis)
Pitot tube coefficient
Average pressure differential of orifice meter, inches H2O
Average velocity head, inches of water
Diameter of particles having a 50 percent probability of penetration, micrometers
<
Formula weight for individual compounds g/g-mole (Ib/lb-mole)
Concentration, grains per dry'standard cubic feet
Mercury *•
Water
Percent moisture
Isokinetic sampling rate, percent
Emission rate, pounds per hour
Emission.rate, kilograms per hour
Dry mole fraction
Avc^fei Dry molecular weight of stack gas, g/g-mole (Ib/lb-mole)
Average Wet molecular weight of stack gas, g/g-mole (Ib/lb-mole)
Milligrams
Milligrams per dry standard cubic meter
Percent oxygen by volume (dry basis)
Barometric pressure, inches Hg
-------
Pg
ppmd
ppmw
Ps
Pstd
Qs
Qsd
Qaw
Theta
tm
ts
Tstd
Vic
Vm
Vm(std)
vs
Vw -
Y
M,
0.02832
0.18
0.28
CONSTANTS, DEFINITIONS, NOMENCLATURE, AND UNITS OF MEASURE
FOR ISOKINETIC AND DRY GAS METER CONSTANT RATE SAMPLING
(continued)
Stack gas static ~- ;..s H2O ,,-
Concentration, parts per million dry by volume
Concentration, parts per million wet by volume
Absolute flue gas pressure, inches Hg
Standard absolute pressure at 29.92 inches of mercury
Total cyclone flow rate at wet cyclone conditions, fVVmin
Volumetric air flow rate, dry standard cubic feet per min (SCFM)
Volumetric air flow rate, wet actual cubic feet per min (ACFM)
Net run time, minutes
Dry gas meter temperature, degrees F
Stack gas temperature, degrees F
Standard absolute temperature, 528° Rankin
Total volume of liquid collected in impingers & silica gel, mL
Volume of metered gas sample, dry ACF
Volume of metered gas sample at dry standard conditions, DSCF
Average flue gas velocity, feet per second
Volume of water vapor, standard cubic feet
Gamma, dry gas meter calibration factor
Viscosity of mixed cyclone gas, micropoise
Cubic meters per cubic foot
Molecular weight of water divided by 100
Molecular weight of nitrogen and/or carbon monoxide divided by 100
-------
129
CONSTANTS, DEFINITIONS, NOMENCLAUTE, AND UNITS Oi
FOR ISOKINETIC AND DRY GAS Ml ER CONSTANT RATE SAMPLING
(continued)
0.32 -~" _^.ca weight of oxygen divided by 100
0.44 Molecular weight of carbon dioxide divided by 100,
0.264 From Equation 3-1 EPA Method 3
0.5 From Equation 3-1 EPA Method 3
13.6 Specific gravity of mercury (1 inch Hg = 13.6 inch H20)
17.64 From EPA Method 5, (68 + 460) °R/29.92 in.Hg
20.9 Percent O2 by volume (dry basis) in ambient air
24.056 Liters per gram-mole at standard conditions
85.49 Pitot tube constant
29.92 Standard pressure, inches mercury
385.3 Molar volume, ftVmole @ 68 degrees F &. 29.92 in. Hg
60 Minutes per hour or seconds per minute
100 Conversion of percent
144 Square inches per square foot
460 0 degrees Fahrenheit in degrees Rankin
528 Standard temperature, degrees Rankin
7,000 Grains per pound
453,592 Milligrams per pound
453,592,000 Micrograms per pound
-------
EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS
Volume of dry gas sampled at standard conditions (68 deg F. 29.92 in. He), dscf.
17.64 * Y * Vm * ( Pbar + (Delta H / 13.6 ))
Vm(std) = •
(tm + 460)
Volume of water vapor in the gas sample corrected to standard conditions, scf.
Vw = (0.04707 * Vic)
Moisture content. Percent By Volume. As Measured In Flue Gas
Vw
%H2O = 100 * --
Vw + Vm(std)
Mole Fraction of Dry Gas.
Mfd = 1 - (9&H2O/100)
Dry molecular weight of gas stream. Ib/lb—mole.
Md = ( 0.440 * % CO2 ) + ( 0.320 * % O2 ) + ( 0.280 * (% N2 + % CO) )
Actual Molecular Weight of Gas Stream (wet basis), Ib/lb —mole.
Ms = ( Md * Mfd ) + ( 18 * ( 1 - Mfd ))
Absolute Gas Pressure. Inches of Mercury
Ps = Pbar + (Pg/13.6)
Average Velocity of Gas Stream at Actual Conditions, ft/sec.
Delta p * (460 + ts)
vs = 85.49 * Cp * SORT ( )
Ps* Ms
o?-May-93 (continued)
Iemplate\exmpcalc.wk3
-------
EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS ? 3 1
Average Gas Stream Volumetric Flowrate at Actual Conditions, acfm.
Qaw = 60/144 * vs * A - ^
f,,' _ _ "«&zf.
Average Gas Stream Dry Volumetric Flowrate at Standard Conditions, dscfm.
Qsd = Qaw * Mfd * Tstd/(ts + 460) * Ps/Pstd
Isokinetic Sampling Rate, percent.
Pstd * 100 * (ts + 460) * Vm(std)
%I = ------------------------------
Tstd * 60 * vs * Ps * Mfd * Theta * Area -nozzle, (ft)2
_r. -
Particulate Concentration, gr/dscf.
7,000 * mg
Gr/DSCF =
453,592 * Vm(std)
Mass Emission Rate, Ib/hr from Milligrams of Catch.
60 * mg * Qsd
Ib/hr = ----------
453,592 * Vm(std)
Mass Emission Rate. Ib/hr from Parts Per Billion, Dry.
60 * ppbvd * Fwt * Qsd
Ib/hr =
3853 * io
Mass Emission Rate, kg/br.
kg/hr = Ib/hr* 453.6/1000
Parts Per Billion By Volume, Dry (using dry std. cubic feeQ.
385.3 * 10 6 Vg
ppbvd =
453,592 * Fwt * Vm(std)
o?-May-93 (continued)
tern pUte\exm pcalc.wk3
-------
EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS
Concentration, Parts Per Billion By Volume, Dry (using micrograms & dry std.liters).
24.056 * Aig/106 «*••'.-^
ppbvd = •- - * 1,000,000
Vm(std) * Fwt
Parts Per Million By Volume. Wet.
ppmw = ppmd * Mfd
Milligrams Per Dry Standard Cubic Meter
mg/DSCM = mg/(Vm(std)* 0.02832)
Milligrams Per Dry Standard Cubic Meter from Parts per Million Dry
mg/DSCM = ppmd * Fwt / 24.056
Stack Gas Viscosity, micropoise
/i. = 152.418 + 0.2552 * ts + 3.2355* 10~6 * ts2 + 0.53147 * %O2 - 74.143 * %H2O/100
Total cyclone flow rate @ wet conditions, acfm
((Vm(std)/(l-%H2O)/100)) * (ts + 460)
Qs =
17.64 * Ps * Theta
Diameter of particles having a 50% probability of penetration, /im
ts + 460
~ D50-= 0.15625 *( )°-2091 * 0-i/Qs)0-7091
Ms* Ps
Particulate Fractionation, %>PM10
%>PM10 = (>PM 10 Catch/Total Particulate Catch) * 100
Particulate Fractionation. %
------- |