U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
           NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
                    WORKING PAPER SERIES
                                        REPORT
                                          ON
                                   WILD HORSE RESERVOIR
                                       ELKD COUNTY
                                        NEVADA
                                      EPA REGION IX
                                   WORKING PAPER No, 815
 CORVALLIS ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY - CORVALLIS, OREGON
                             and
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING & SUPPORT LABORATORY - LAS VEGAS, NEVADA

-------
                                  REPORT
                                    ON
                           WILD HORSE RESERVOIR
                                ELKD COUNTY
                                  NEVADA
                               EPA REGION IX
                           WORKING PAPER No, 815
      WITH THE COOPERATION OF THE
NEVADA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION SERVICE
                AND THE
         NEVADA NATIONAL GUARD
            SEPTEMBER, 1977

-------
       REPORT ON WILD HORSE RESERVOIR

             ELKO COUNTY, NEVADA

                EPA REGION IX


                     by

       National  Eutrophication Survey

        Water and Land Quality Branch
       Monitoring Operations Division
Environmental Monitoring & Support Laboratory
              Las Vegas, Nevada

                     and

           Special Studies Branch
 Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory
              Con/all is, Oregon
            Working Paper No. 815
     OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
    U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

               September 1977

-------
                                   1
                               CONTENTS
Foreword                                                  ii
List of Nevada Study Lakes                                1v
Lake and Drainage Area Map                                 v
Sections
  I.  Conclusions                                          !
 II.  Lake and Drainage Basin Characteristics              4
III.  Lake Water Quality Summary                           6
 IV.  Nutrient Loadings                                   12
  V.  Literature Reviewed                                 17
 VI.  Appendices                                          18

-------
                                  11


                               FOREWORD
     The National Eutrophication Survey was initiated in 1972 in
response to an Administration commitment to investigate the nation-
wide threat of accelerated eutrophication to freshwater lakes and
reservoirs.

OBJECTIVES

     The Survey was designed to develop, in conjunction with state
environmental agencies, information on nutrient sources, concen-
trations, and impact on selected freshwater lakes as a basis for
formulating comprehensive and coordinated national, regional, and
state management practices relating to point source discharge
reduction and nonpoint source pollution abatement in lake water-
sheds.

ANALYTIC APPROACH

     The mathematical and statistical procedures selected for the
Survey's eutrophication analysis are based on related concepts
that:

     a.  A generalized representation or model  relating
         sources, concentrations, and impacts can be
         constructed.

     b.  By applying measurements of relevant parameters
         associated with lake degradation, the generalized
         model can be transformed into an operational
         representation of a lake, its drainage basin, and
         related nutrients.

     c.  With such a transformation, an assessment of the
         potential for eutrophication control  can be made.

LAKE ANALYSIS

     In this report, the first stage of evaluation of lake and
watershed data collected from the study lake and its drainage
basin is documented.  The report is formatted to provide state
environmental  agencies with specific information for basin
planning [§303(e)],  water quality criteria/standards review
[§303(c)],  clean lakes [§314(a,b)], and water quality monitoring
[§106 and §305(b)] activities mandated by the Federal Water
Pollution Control  Act Amendments of 1972.

-------
                                 Ill

     Beyond the single lake analysis, broader based correlations
between nutrient concentrations (and loading) and trophic
condition are being made to advance the rationale and data
base for refinement of nutrient water quality criteria for
the Nation's freshwater lakes.  Likewise, multivariate evaluations
for the relationships between land use, nutrient export, and
trophic condition, by lake class or use, are being developed
to assist in the formulation of planning guidelines and policies
by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and to augment
plans implementation by the States.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

     The staff of the National Eutrophication Survey (Office
of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency) expresses sincere appreciation to the Nevada State
Environmental Protection Service for professional involvement,
to the Nevada National Guard for conducting the tributary
sampling phase of the Survey, and to those Nevada wastewater
treatment plant operators who provided effluent samples and
flow data.

     The staff of the Department of Conservation and Natural
Resources, Division of Environmental Protection, State Environmental
Protection Service provided invaluable lake documentation
and counsel during the Survey, reviewed the preliminary reports
and provided critiques most useful in the preparation of this
Working Paper Series.

     Major General Floyd L. Edsall, the Adjutant General of
Nevada, and Project Officer Major Harold E. Roberts, who directed
the volunteer efforts of the Nevada National Guardsmen, are
also gratefully acknowledged for their assistance to the Survey.

-------
                                 IV
                    NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
                              STUDY LAKES
                            STATE OF NEVADA
LAKE NAME
Lake Mead
Lahontan Reservoir
Rye Patch Reservoir
Lake Tahoe

Topaz Reservoir
Upper Pahranagat Lake
Washoe Lake
Wildhorse Reservoir
Wilson Reservoir
Walker Lake
    COUNTY
Clark (Mohave in Arizona)
Lyon, Churchill
Pershing
Washoe, Carson City,
Douglas (Placer,
El Dorado in CA)
Douglas (Mono in CA)
Lincoln
Washoe
Elko
Elko
Mineral

-------
   o
   h
   o
    WILD HORSE  RESERVOIR

-------
                REPORT ON WILD HORSE RESERVOIR,  NEVADA
                            STORE! NO.  3209

I.    CONCLUSIONS
     A.    Trophic Condition;*
               Survey data indicate that  Wild  Horse  Reservoir  is  eutrophic,
          i.e., nutrient rich  and highly  productive.   Whether  such  nutrient
          enrichment is to be  considered  beneficial  or deleterious  is
          determined by its actual  or potential  impact upon  designated
          beneficial water uses of the lake.
               Chlorophyll a_ values in the lake  ranged from  0.8 pg/1  in
          November to 387.2 yg/1  in August with  a  mean of  75.5 pg/1.
          Secchi disc visibility was low  and the potential for primary
          productivity as measured by algal assay  control  yields  was  high.
          Marked depression of dissolved  oxygen  occurred  in  the hypolimnion
          during the August sampling.  Of the  10 Nevada lakes  sampled in
          1975, 4 had higher median total  phosphorus  values  (0.114  mg/1),
          2 had higher median  inorganic nitrogen levels (0.320 mg/1), and
          3 had higher median  orthophosphorus  values  (0.065  mg/1) than
          Wild Horse Reservoir.
     *See Appendix E.

-------
B.   Rate-Limiting Nutrient:
          Algal assay results indicate that Wild Horse Reservoir was
     limited by available nitrogen during the spring sampling (05/30/75)
     and by available phosphorus during the fall (11/06/75).  The reser-
     voir data suggest primary limitation by nitrogen during the three
     sampling dates.
C.   Nutrient Controllability:
     1.   Point sources -
               There were no known point sources impacting Wild Horse
          Reservoir during the sampling year.
               It should be noted that substantial  nutrient impact to
          the reservoir attributable to shoreline septic tanks may exist.
          Those U.S. Geological  Survey (USGS) quadrangles used for deter-
          mining the number of shoreline residences! located within 100
          meters of the lake were dated in the 1950's and 1960's.
          Thus the present number of septic tanks in the area is not
          known; neither has it been ascertained if those outside the
          100 meter limit (U.S.  EPA, 1975) do contribute nutrients to
          the lake as has been suggested (F.  Luchetti, Personal  communi-
          cation).  The Nevada Department of Human  Resources (1975)
          reports the lack of adequate sanitary facilities serving
          visitors to the lake may result in localized enrichment
          problems.   Additional  study is recommended to obtain a more

-------
     accurate picture of the nutrient budget for Wild Horse Reservoir.
                                                      2
          The present phosphorus loading of 0.67 g P/m /yr is  twice
     that proposed by Vollenweider (1975) as "eutrophic"  for a lake
     of such volume and hydraulic retention time.   Examination of
     surrounding land use practices may provide answers to reduction
     of nonpoint contributions to the lake.
2.    Nonpoint sources -
          The Owyhee River contributed 30.6% of the total  phosphorus
     load to Wild Horse Reservoir during the sampling year, Deep  Creek
     contributed 6.7%, and minor tributaries and immediate drainage
     contributed 60.1%.  The Nevada Department of Human Resources
     (1975) lists agricultrual runoff as one of the main  sources
     of nonpoint enrichment in the Wild Horse Reservoir watershed.
          The nutrient export rates of Owyhee River and Deep Creek
     (Section IV-D) were substantially greater during the sampling
     year than the inflowing tributary to nearby Wilson Reservoir*.
*See Working Paper No. 816, "Report on Wilson Reservoir".

-------
II.   LAKE AND DRAINAGE BASIN CHARACTERISTICS

          Lake and drainage basin characteristics  are itemized  below.

     Lake morphometry data were provided by James  B.  Williams,  Jr.  (per-

     sonal communication).  Tributary flow data  were  provided by  the

     Nevada District Office of the U.S.  Geological  Survey (USGS).   Outlet

     drainage area includes the lake surface area.  Mean  hydraulic  reten-

     tion time was obtained by dividing  the lake volume by mean flow of

     the outlet.   Precipitation values are estimated  by methods as  out-

     lined in National Eutrophication Survey (NES)  Working Paper  No. 175.

     A table of metric/English conversions is included as Appendix  A.

     A.    Lake Morphometry:
                                      2
          1.   Surface area:  12.14 km .
          2.   Mean depth:  7.3 meters.
          3.   Maximum depth:   26.5 meters.
          4.   Volume:  88.811 x 106 m3.
          5.   Mean hydraulic retention  time:  894 days (2.4 yrs).

-------
B.   Tributary and Outlet:
     (See Appendix B for flow data)

     1.    Tributaries -

                                             Drainage       Mean Flow
          Name                               area (km2)      (m3/sec)

          A-2 Owyhee River                    145.0           0.54
          B-l Deep Creek                       42.5           0.20

          Minor tributaries and
          immediate drainage -                342.7           0.47

                    Total                      530.2           1.21

     2.    Outlet - A-l  Owyhee River            541.3           1.15

C.   Precipitation:

     1.    Year of sampling:  39.1  cm.
     2.    Mean annual:   37.4 cm.

-------
III.  LAKE WATER QUALITY SUMMARY
          Wild Horse Reservoir was  sampled  three  times  during  the  open-
     water season of 1975 by means  of  a  pontoon-equipped  Huey  helicopter.
     Each time, samples for physical and chemical  parameters were  collected
     from five stations on the lake and  from  a  number of  depths  at each
     station (see map,  page v).  During  the last  two visits, depth-
     integrated samples for chlorophyll  ^analysis were collected  from
     each station and on each sampling date samples for phytoplankton
     identification and enumeration were taken.   During the first  and
     last visits, 18.9-liter depth-integrated samples were composited for
     algal  assays.   Maximum depths  sampled  were 11.3 meters at Station 01,
     21.3 meters at Station 02, 19.8 meters at  Station  03, 4.6 meters at
     Station 04, and 7.6 meters at  Station  05.  For a more detailed ex-
     planation of NES methods, see  NES Working  Paper No.  175.
          The results obtained are  presented  in full in Appendix C and are
     summarized in III-A for waters at the  surface and  at the  maximum depth
     for each site.  Results of the phytoplankton  counts  and chlorophyll
     ^determinations are included  in  III-B.  Results of  the limiting
     nutrient study are presented in III-C.

-------
* I L"""^ _;t  •^i^'-.-i-i • I  •
STO=£T  COOE
                                                                  AND  CHEMICAL CHA3ACTE* IST ICb
                                                                                                               (  ll/ 6/75  )
             (OEG
DISSOLVED  OXYGEN (•"-,,
o.-i.s M DEPTH
*AX DEPTH**

CONDUCTIVITY  (U«HO«>
O.-l.S M DEPTH
MAX
PH  (STANDARD UNITS)
o.-i.=; M  DEPTH
MAX
TOTOL ALKALINITY c--f,/L)
0.-!.=.  M  DEPTH
'••AX
TOTAL P  (MG/L)
o.-i.=i M  DEPTH
MAX DEPTH««

DISSOLVED OHTHO P (MG/L)
o.-l.=: >*  DEPTH
"AX
MO?*N03  (MG/L)
O.-l.1? M  OEPTH
MAX
AMMONIA
O.-l.S M  OEf-TH
MAX DEPTH9»
KJtLDAHL  N
O.-l.^  M  DEPTH
MAX DFPTH»«
•<»
7
)
6
4
7
c,
7
5
)
6
4
6
4
L)
6
4
f,
4
6
4
4
*AN
7.0-
?.«-
8.4-
8.3-
78.-
90.-
7.7-
0.-
0.108-0
0.100-0
0.02H-0
0.060-0
0.040-0
0.050-0
0.600-1
0.400-0
GF •.,;• ni fl..j
10.0 « . *•>
11 . S ll.»
10.4 •< . V
100. ion.
100. 10".
11.1 9.*
9.1 8.0
77. f>*.
Ml. 74.
.130 0.114
.20? 0.1'?
.06v 0.05t>
.067 0.050
.^40 O.l^O
. 2"0 0 . ?0b
.150 0 . 0 A 0
.100 0.075
.300 0.750
.800 O.^G
DEPT-
<^ET-
o.o-
4.3-
o.o-
4.3-
0.0-
4.3-
0.0-
4.3-
0.0-
4.3-
0.0-
4.3-
0.0-
4.3-
0.0-
4.3-
0.0-
4.3-
0.0-
4.3-
J
0.9
21.3
19. M
?U3
0.9
21 .3
0.9
19.8
0.9
19.8
0.9
19. *
0.9
19.*
0.9
19.8
0.9
19.8
N« -ANGE
c 20. S- 23.0
  s = MO. OF SITES  SAMPLED ON THI«  PATE

-------
                                   8
B.   Biological Characteristics:

     1.   Phytoplankton -

          Sampling
          Date

          05/30/75
          08/01/75
          11/06/75
                         Algal
Dominant                 Units
Genera                   Per ml

1.  Centric diatom        8,958
2.  Fragilaria              444
3.  Cryptomonas             121
4.  Phormidium              121
5.  Lyngbya                  81

    Other genera         	80

         Total            9,805

1.  Gloeotrichia            541
2.  Fragilaria              496
3.  Aphanizpmenon           270
4.  Aphanothece90
5.  Cocconeis                90

    Other genera            225

         Total            1,712

1.  Chroomonas?             196
2.  Aphanizomenon            33
3.  Trachelomonas            33
4.  Schroederia              33

    Other genera            —
                                                 Total
                            295

-------
2.    Chlorophyll a_ -
     Sampling                 Station              Chlorophyll  a_
     Date                     Number               (yig/1)	

     08/01/75                   01                      10.0
                                02                      20.3
                                03                      13.6
                                04                     309.7
                                05                     387.2

     11/06/75                   01                       0.8
                                02                       3.5
                                03                       3.5
                                04                       2.5
                                05                       4.2

-------
                                   10
C.   Limiting Nutrient Study:

     1.   Autoclaved, filtered,  and nutrient  spiked
          Spike (mg/1)

          a.   05/30/75

          Control
          0.05 P
          0.05 P + 1.0  N
          1.00 N
Ortho P
Cone, (mg/1)
  0.045
  0.095
  0.095
  0.045
Inorganic N
Cone, (mg/1)
  0.135
  0.135
  1.135
  1.135
          b.   11/06/75  Stations  01-03

          Control           0.060          0.390
          0.05 P           0.110          0.390
          0.05 P + 1.0 N   0.110          1.390
          1.00 N           0.060          1.390

                         Stations  04-05

          Control           0.075          0.520
          0.05 P           0.125          0.520
          0.05 P + 1.0 N   0.125          1.520
          1.00 N           0.075          1.520
Maximum Yield
(mg/1-dry wt.)
     7.7
     8.4
    34.9
    19.9
                                   8.4
                                  10.9
                                   9.7
                                   7.4
                                  15.4
                                  18.6
                                  16.7
                                  12.3

-------
                                   11
2.   Discussion -
          The control  yields of the assay alga,  Selenastrum capri-
     cornutum*,  indicate  that the  potential  for  primary  productivity  in
     Wild Horse Reservoir was high at both sample collection times
     (05/30/75, 11/06/75).  In the May assay,  a  significant increase  in
     yield over that of the control occurred when nitrogen was  added
     alone and in combination with phosphorus, indicating nitrogen
     limitation.  Spikes  of phosphorus alone resulted in a yield which
     was not significantly greater than that of  the control.  In the
     November assays, the slight increases in  growth over control  yields
     produced by the addition of phosphorus suggest phosphorus  limitation.
          The mean inorganic nitrogen to orthophosphorus ratios (N/P)
     in the lake data of less than 7/1 on all  three sampling occasions
     suggest primary limitation by nitrogen (a mean N/P  ratio of 14/1
     or greater generally reflects phosphorus  limitation).
     *For further information regarding the  algal  assay  test  procedure
     and selection of test organisms,  see  U.S.  EPA (1971).

-------
                                  12
IV.   NUTRIENT LOADINGS
     (See Appendix D for data)


          For the determination  of nutrient  loadings,  the  Nevada National


     Guard collected monthly near-surface  grab  samples  from  each of the


     tributary sites indicated on  the map  (page v),  except for  the high


     runoff months of April, May and  June  when  two samples were collected.


     Sampling was begun in November 1974,  and was completed  in  October


     1975.


          Through an interagency agreement,  stream flow estimates for the


     year of sampling and a "normalized" or  average  year were provided by


     the Nevada District Office  of the USGS  for the  tributary sites nearest


     the lake.


          In this report, nutrient loads for sampled tributaries were


     determined by using a modification of a USGS computer program for


     calculating stream loadings.   Nutrient  loads indicated  for tributaries


     are those measured minus known point  source loads, if any.


          Nutrient loadings for  unsampled  "minor tributaries and immediate


     drainage" ("II" of USGS) were estimated by using  the  mean  annual

                             2
     nutrient loads, in kg/km /year,  in Owyhee  River and Deep Creek at

                                                                       2
     Stations A-2 and B-2 and multiplying  the means  by  the II area in km  .

-------
                                   13
A.   Waste Sources;

     1.   Known municipal - None

     2.   Known industrial - None

B.   Annual Total Phosphorus Loading - Average Year:

     1.   Inputs -
                                                            I of
          Source                             kg P/yr        total

          a.   Tributaries (nonpoint load) -

               A-2 Owyhee River               2,445          30.6
               B-l Deep Creek                   530           6.7

          b.   Minor tributaries and immediate
               drainage (nonpoint load) -     4,800          60.1

          c.   Known municipal STP's - None

          d.   Septic tanks - None known

          e.   Known industrial - None

          f.   Direct precipitation* -          210           2.6

                              Total           7,985         100.0%

     2.   Outlets - A-l Owyhee River         10,415

     3.   Net annual P export** -             2,430
     *Estimated  (See NES Working Paper No. 175).
     *Export probably due to unknown sources and/or sampling error.

-------
                                   14
C.   .Annual Total Nitrogen Loading - Average Year:

     1.    Inputs -
                                                            % of
          Source                             kgN/yr        total

          a.   Tributaries (nonpoint load) -

               A-2 Owyhee River              37,190          27.9
               B-l Deep Creek                 7,775           5,8

          b.   Minor tributaries and immediate
               drainage (nonpoint load) -    75,395          56.5

          c.   Known municipal STP's - None

          d.   Septic tanks - None known

          e.   Known industrial - None

          f.   Direct precipitation* -       13.105           9.8

                              Total         133,465         100.0%

     2.    Outputs - A-2 Owyhee River         61,640

     3.    Net annual N accumulation -        71,825
     *Estimated (See NES Working Paper No. 175),

-------
                                   15
D.   Mean Annual  Nonpoint Nutrient Export by Subdrainage  Area:
                                               7              2
     Tributary                          kg P/km /yr    kg N/km /yr

     Owyhee River                            17            256
     Deep Creek                              12            183

E.   Mean Nutrient Concentrations in Ungaged Streams:

                                        Mean Total  P    Mean Total N
     Tributary                             (mq/1)          (mg/1)

     C-l Penrod Creek                       0.087           1.000

-------
                                   16
F.   Yearly Loadings:
          In the following table, the existing phosphorus annual  loading
     is compared to the relationship proposed by Vollenweider (1975).
     Essentially, his "eutrophic" loading is that at which the receiving
     waters would become eutrophic or remain eutrophic; his "oligotrophic"
     loading is that which would result in the receiving water remaining
     oligotrophic or becoming oligotrophic if morphometry permitted.   A
     "mesotrophic" loading would be considered one between "eutrophic" and
     "oligotrophic".
          Note that Vollenweider's model  may not apply to lakes with  short
     hydraulic retention times or in which light penetration is severely
     restricted by high concentrations of suspended solids in the surface
     waters.
                             Total  Yearly
                          Phosphorus Loading
                               (g/m^/yr)
     Estimated loading for Wild Horse Reservoir                  0.66
     Vollenweider's "eutrophic" loading                          0.34
     Vollenweider's "oligotrophic" loading                       0.17

-------
                                   17
V.   LITERATURE REVIEWED

     Luchetti, F.  1977.  Personal communication (septic tanks).  Nevada
       Environmental Protection Service, Carson City, Nevada.

     Nevada Department of Human Resources.  1975.  Water Quality Manage-
       ment Plan for the Nevada Portion of the Snake River Basin, Carson
       City, Nevada.

     U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.  1971.  Algal Assay Procedure
       Bottle Test.  National Eutrophication Research Program, Corvallis,
       Oregon.

     U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.  1975.  National Eutrophica-
       tion Survey Methods 1973-1976.  Working Paper No. 175.  National
       Environmental Research Center, Las Vegas, Nevada, and Pacific
       Northwest Environmental Research Laboratory, Corvallis, Oregon.

     Vollenweider, R. A.  1975.  Input-Output Models With Special
       Reference to the Phosphorus Loading Concept in Limnology.
       Schweiz. Z. Hydrol.  37:53-84.

     Williams, James B.  1974.  Personal communication (lake morphometry),
       Department of Human Resources, Carson City, Nevada,

-------
                                18





VI.  APPENDICES
                            APPENDIX  A



                        CONVERSION  FACTORS

-------
                 CONVERSION FACTORS





Hectares x 2.471 = acres



Kilometers x 0.6214 = miles



Meters x 3.281 = feet


                         -4
Cubic meters x 8.107 x 10   = acre/feet



Square kilometers x 0.3861 = square miles



Cubic meters/sec x 35.315 = cubic feet/sec



Centimeters x 03837 = inches



Kilograms x 2.205 = pounds



Kilograms/square kilometer x 5.711 - Ibs/square mile

-------
   APPENDIX B




TRIBUTARY FLOW DATA

-------
                                             FLQB  INFORMATION  FOR  NEVADA
                                                                               1/21/77
LAKt CODE 3209     BlLD HORSE RESERv/OI*

     TOTAL DRAINAGE A^EA OF LAKtCSQ KM)     5*1.J
          SUB-DRAINAGE
TRIBUTARY  AREAISQ KM)
                          JAN
                                                   APR
                                                           MAY
                                                   NORMALIZED FLOHS(CMS)
                                                     JUN     JUL      AUG
                                                                                           SEP
                                               OCT
                                                                                                           NOV
                                                                DEC
3209A1
3209A2
320991
3209ZZ
541.3
145.0
 42o5
356.3
0.057
0.355
0.085
0.2?7
0.227
0.255
0.085
0.227
0.311
1.453
0.170
0.396
2.039
1.161
0.425
0.991
2.577
1.869
0.680
1.614
2.265
1.529
0.566
1.303
2.322
0.425
0.142
0.368
2.322 1.274
0.113 O.OBb
0.057 0.028
0.113 0.085
0.255
0.113
0.042
0.113
0.057
0.113
0.042
0.113
0.028
0.142
0.057
0.113
1
0
0
0
SUMMARY
TOTAL
SUM OF
DRAINAGE
AREA OF
LAKE =
SUB-DRAINAGE AREAS =
541.3
54?. 3




TOTAL FLOW IN =
TOTAL FLOH OUT =
14
13
.55
.73




     MEAN MONTHLY FLOdS AND DAILY FLO*S
TRIBUTARY

3209A1
            MONTH   YEAR
               MEAN FLOW  OAV
FLOW  DAY
FLOW  DAY
FLOW
3209A?
11
12
1
?
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
0.210
0.028
0.023
0.020
0.025
1.472
10.591
5.720
1.189
2.095
1.388
2.124
0.057
0.051
0.051
0.071
0.113
0.255
0.850
0.198
0.085
0.028
0.031
0.034
?4
11
IB
?.?
??
13
1?
7
2n
17
13
12
24
13
18
2?
??
13
1?
7
20
17
13
1?
0.201
0.028
0.023
0.020
0.028
0.680 28
2.577 24
8.495 22
0.122
2.379
1.671
1.529
0.057
0.042
0.051
n.068
0.127
0.255 28
0.991 24
0.283 22
0.062
0.023
0.031
0.034





2.407
15.914
4.276









0.566
0.850
0.113





-------
LAKE COOt 3209
                TRIBUTakY FLOW INFORMATION FOR NEVADA

*ILD HOUSE RESERVOIR
                                                                                            1/21/77
     MEAN MONTHLY FLO«S AND DAILY FLO*S(CMS)

TRIBUTARY   MONTH   YtAw    MEAN FLO*  DAY

3209B1
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
0.0
0.011
0.028
0.042
0.085
0.283
1.982
0.991
0.113
0.003
0.0
0.0
24
n
18
2?
2?
n
1?
7
20
17
13
9
                                FLO«  DAY
                                                  n.o
                                                  0.003
                                                  0.037
                                                  0.0*0
                                                  n.142
                                                  0.255
                                                  2.265
                                                  1.557
                                                  0.085
                                                  0.003
                                                  0.0
                                                  0.0
 FLO*  DAY
FLOW
                                       28
                                       24
                                       22
0.566
2.124
0.708

-------
        APPENDIX C



PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL DATA

-------
STORET RETRIEVAL OftTE 77/01/26
NATL EUTrtOPHICATION SURVEY
EPA-LAS VEGAS
                          320901
                         41 41 02,0 115 48 16.0 3
                         «!!_QHORS£ RESERVOIR
                         32007   NEVADA
/TYPA/AMBNT/LAKE
  DATE   TIME DEPTH
  FROM    OF
   TO    DAY  FEET

75/05/30 10 00 0000
         10 00 0003
         10 00 0006
         10 00 0010
         10 00 0016
         10 00 0023
         10 00 0035
75/08/01 16 07 0000
         16 07 0009
         16 07 0024
         16 07 0037
75/11/06 13 35 0000
         13 35 0005
         13 35 0015
         13 35 0030
                         11EPALES  751216    04001002
                          0035 FEET  DEPTH  CLASS 00
OOC10
WATER
TEMP
CENT
8.0
7.0
6.5
6.0
6.0
5.5
5.0
23.0
18.0
15.8
11.0
5.8
5.8
5.8
5.7
00300
DO

MG/L
3.8
8.4
10.2

7.2

9.3
11.0
11.6
5.4
0.8
7.2
7.4
7.0
7.0
00077 00094
TRANSP CNDUCTVY
SECCHI FIELD
INCHES MICBOMHO
17 78
83
85
86
86
92
90
6 13
12
12
11
177
180
181
179
00400
PH

su
9.80
9.00
8.80
8.60
7.80
8.00
7.70
8.70
8.65
8.00
7.75
7.50
7.55
7.50
7.55
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
57
60
65

63

72
79
77
79
72
75
75
74
75
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.090
0.070
0.080

0.100

0.090
0.060
0.050
0.120
0.120
0.250
0.260
0.240
0.260
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
1.300
0.600
0.600

0.600

0.600
2.400
1.300
1.100
0.800
0.700
0.800
0.700
0.800
00630
N024.N03
N-TOTAL
MS/L
o.iao
o.?oo
O.?10

O.?40

O.?50
0.030
0.020
0.170
0.180
0.230
O.?40
0.240
0.240
00671
PHOS-DIS
OWTHO
MG/L P
0.069
0.054
0.054

0.058

0.058
0.076
0.018
0.124
0.117
0.069
0.070
0.068
0.078
                      00665     32217
  DATE   TIME DEPTH PHOS-TOT  CHLRPHYL
  FROM    OF                     A
   TO    DAY  FEET   MG/L P     UG/L

75/05/30 10 00 0000    0.130
         10 00 0003    0.108
         10 00 0006    0.114
         10 00 0016    0.117
         10 00 0035    0.120
75/08/01 16 07 0000    0.332      10.0
         16 07 0009    0.201
         16 07 0024    0.282
         16 07 0037    0.228
75/11/06 13 35 0000    0.109       0.8
         13 35 0005    0.115
         13 35 0015    0.115
         13 35 0030    0.114
  00031
IMCDT LT
REMNING
PERCENT

-------
STCRET RETRIEVAL DATE 77/01/26
NATL EJTROPHICATION SURVEY
EPA-LAS tfEGAS
 320902
61 41 12.0 115 50 23.0 3
wILDHORSE RESEHVOI3
32007   NEVADA
/TYPA/AMBWT/LAKE
11EPALES  751216    04001002
 0070 FEET  DEPTH  CLASS oo
DATE
FROM
TO
75/05/30






75/08/01




75/11/06




00010
TIME DEPTH WATER
OF TEMP
DAY FEET
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
15
15
15
15
15
14
14
14
14
14
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
07
07
07
07
07
15
15
15
15
15
0000
0006
0010
0016
0033
0050
0070
0000
0012
0027
0040
0063
0000
0005
0015
0035
0062
CENT
8.0
7.0
6.0
5.4
4.8
3.9
2.8
21.0
18.3
16.3
10.0
7.8
5.9
5.9
5.8
5.5
5.4
00300
DO

MG/L
11.5
7.9
9.6
9.1

4.0

6.2
6.0
2.6
0.4
1.0
7.2
6.8
6.6
6.6
6.6
00077 00094
TRANSP CNDUCTVY
SECCHI FIELD
INCHES MICROMHO
15 100
100
100
100
100
100
100
6 12
12
12
10
10
177
180
161
180
181
00400
PH

SU
8.60
8.60
8.40
7.40
8.20
8.20
8.00
8.30
8.40
7.80
7.50
7.40
7.60
7.60
7.55
7.50
7.50
00410
T ALK
CAC03
M6/L
OR
63
66
74

76

80
77
76
77
78
76
80
82
81
85
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.150
0.060
0.070
0.080

0.120

0.060
0.050
0.050
0.180
0.280
0.220
0.240
0.240
0.220
0.230
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.600
0.600
0.500
0.600

0.800

1.000
0.700
0.600
0.700
1.000
0.700
0.700
0.700
0.700
0.800
00630
N02S.N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
O.?40
O.?30
0.240
0.240

O.?50

0.040
0.040
0.170
O.?10
0.160
0.220
0.220
0.230
O.?40
0.740
00671
PHOS-DIS
09THO
MG/L P
0.057
0.054
0.055
0.054

0.043

0.036
0,033
0.064
0.134
0.114
0.069
0.069
0.067
0.066
0.067
DATE
FROM
TO
75/05/30




75/08/01




75/11/06




00665 32217 00031
TIME DEPTH PHOS-TOT CHLRPHYL INCDT LT
OF A REMNING
DAY FEET
11
11
11
11
11
15
15
15
15
15
14
14
14
14
14
00 0000
00 0006
00 0010
00 0016
00 0050
07 0000
07 0012
07 0027
07 0040
07 0063
15 0000
15 0005
15 0015
15 0035
15 0062
MG/L P
0.116
0.113
0.116
0.144
0.235
0.097
0.061 .
0.094
0.196
0.253
0.108
0.108
0.104
0.118
o.i as
UG/L PERCENT





20.3




3.5





-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 77/01/36
*JATL EUTROPhlCATIOW SURVtY
EPA-LAS VEGAS
 320903
41 40 48.0 115 49 03.0
WILDHCMSE RESEKVOIR
32007   NEVADA
/TYPA/AM6NT/LAKE
11EPALES  751216    04001002
 0065 FEET  DEPTH  CLASS 00

DATE
FROM
TO
75/05/30






75/08/01




75/11/06





TIME DEPTH
OF

DAY FEET
12 00
12 00
12 00
12 00
12 00
12 00
12 00
15 40
15 40
15 40
15 40
15 40
14 00
14 00
14 00
14 00
0000
0006
0010
0016
0033
0045
0065
0000
0012
0024
0040
0060
0000
0005
0015
0050
00010
HATER
TEMP
CENT
8.5
7.9
6.5
5.4
4.8
4.0
3.5
20.5
17.8
15.4
10.5
7.5
5.8
5.8
5.8
5.4
00300
DO

MG/L
11.5
9.2
12.8
9.5
9.fl

8.6
8.0
6.2
2.0
1.8
1.0
7.4
7.4
7.0
7.0
00077 00094
TRANSP CNOUCTVY
SECCHI FIELD
INCHES MICPOMHO
15 100
100
100
96
94
94
94
6 13
11
12
10
11
177
174
180
178
00400
PH

su
9.09
8.20
7.90
8.40
8.40
8.30
7.70
8.85
8.65
8.00
7.60
7.95
7.60
7.90
7.60
7.60
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
70
74
73
75
80

81
79
80
77
75
82
80
74
75
72
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.050
0.050
0.050
0.050
0.110

0.100
0.040
0.060
0.060
0.120
0.260
0.2?0
0.220
0.210
0.220
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.900
0.600
0.500
0.700
0.600

0.700
0.800
O.BOO
0.700
0.700
0.900
0.700
0.700
0.700
0.700
006.10
N02&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.160
0.190
0.210
O.?10
O.?70

0.280
0.030
0.030
0.190
O.?60
0.150
0.220
0.210
O.?10
0.240
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MR/L P
0.058
0.050
0.057
0.056
0.066

0.067
0.022
0.020
0.072
0.069
0.155
0.068
0.068
0.067
0.066

DATE
FROM
TO
75/05/30





75/08/01




75/11/06




TIME
OF
DAY
12 00
12 00
12 00
12 00
12 00
12 00
15 40
15 40
15 40
15 40
15 40
14 00
14 00
14 00
14 00

DEPTH

FEET
0000
0006
0010
0016
0033
0065
0000
0012
0024
0040
0060
0000
0005
0015
0050
00665
PHOS-TOT

MG/L P
0.127
0.113
0.113
0.116
0.127
0.125
0.069
0.051
0.114
0.141
0.284
0.110
0.108
0.111
0.105
32217 00031
CHLRPHYL INCOT LT
A REMNING
UG/L PERCENT






13.6




3.5




-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 77/01/26
NATL EUTROPHlCATION SURVEY
EPA-LAS VEGAS
                          320904
                         41 39 23.0 115 47 41.0 3
                         WILOHORSE RESEHVOIR
                         32007   NEVADA
/TYPA/AMbNT/LAKE

DATE
FROM
TO
75/05/30



75/08/01

75/11/06



TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
13 00 0000
13 00 0006
13 00 0010
13 00 0014
13 42 0000
13 42 0006
13 00 0000
13 00 0005
13 00 0015
00010
*ATER
TEMP
CENT
10.0
9.9
9.9
8.5
22.5
16.5
5.3
5.4
5.4
                                00300     00077
                                 DO      TRANSP   CN
                                         «:ECCHI   FIELD
                                MG/L     INCHES   MI
                                  11.4
                                   9.4

                                  10.4
                                  10.6
                                   8.2
                                   8.8
                                   7.2
                                   7.6
                                               14
                         lltPALES  751216    04001002
                          0014 FEET  DEPTH  CLASS  00
94
TVY

MHO
100
100
100
100
13
12
179
177
179
00400
PH

SU
11.09
10.89
10.40
9.00
9.10
9.30
7.20
7.35
7.40
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
77
76

70
76
79
73
74
77
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.050
0.040

0.050
0.100
0.040
0.200
0.200
0.220
00625
TOT KJEL
M
MG/L
0.800
0.700

0.400
2.600
0.800
0.700
0.800
0.800
00630
N02&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.060
0.060

0.060
0.020K
0.020K
O.?20
0.230
0.230
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTMO
MG/L P
0.035
0.031

0.028
0.060
0.021
0.065
0.069
0.070
                      00665     32217
  DATE   TIME DEPTH PHOS-TOT  CHLRPHYL
  FROM    OF                     A
   TO    DAY  FEET   MG/L P     UG/L

75/05/30 13 00 0000    0.112
         13 00 0006    0.106
         13 00 0014    0.100
75/08/01 13 42 0000    0.357     309.7
         13 42 0006    0.068
75/11/06 13 00 0000    0.112       2.5
         13 00 0005    0.113
         13 00 0015    0.113
  00031
IMCDT LT
REMNING
PERCENT
  K VALUE KNOWN TO BE LESS
      THAN INDICATED

-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE  77/01/36
NATL EUTROPHICATION  SUHVEY
EPA-LAS VEGAS
 320905
41 40 14.0 115 47  18.0 3
WILOHORSE RESERVOIR
33007   NEVADA
/TYPA/AM8NT/LAKE
11EPALES 751216 04001002
0031 FEET DEPTH CLASS

DATE
FWOM
TO
75/05/30





75/08/01


75/11/06



DATE
FROM
TO
75/05/30



*75/08/01


75/11/06



TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
14 00 0000
14 00 0003
14 00 0006
14 00 0010
14 00 0016
14 00 0025
14 20 0000
14 20 0009
14 20 0015
13 20 0000
13 20 0005
13 20 0015

TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
14 00 0000
14 00 0006
14 00 0016
14 00 0025
14 20 0000
14 20 0009
14 20 0015
13 20 0000
13 20 0005
13 20 0015
00010
MATER
TEMP
CENT
9.7
9.7
9.7
9.4
7.0
6.0
22.4
18.7
16.5
6.0
6.0
6.0
00665
PHOS-TOT
*
MG/L P
0.111
0.105
0.129
0.202
0.514
0.068
0.104
0.137
0.132
0.134
00300
DO

MG/L
11.4

11.3

8.4
8.3
10.6
7.0
6.0
7.2
7.2
7.0
32217
CHLRPHYL
A
UG/L




387.2


4.2


00077 00094
TRANSP CNDUCTVY
sECCHI FIELD
INCHES MICROMHO
15 100
100
100
100
100
100
6 13
12
12
184
184
184
00031
INCDT LT
PFMNING
PERCENT










00400
PH

su
9
9
9
8
8
9
8
8
8
7
7
7

















.40
.40
.30
.90
.80
.10
.70
.75
.40
.50
.50
.50














00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
76

76

82
76
76
80
78
79
80
81














00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.040

0.040

0.050
0.060
0.070
0.040
0.740
0.220
0.290
0.230














00
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.700

0.500

0.600
0.800
3.200
0.800
0.900
0.800
0.800
0.800















00610
N02&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.080

0.070

0.140
0.160
0.020K
0.020K
O.?30
0.300
O.?30
0.220















00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.035

0.034

0.042
0.042
0.224
0.024
0.028
0.080
0.082
0.082














       K VALUE KNOWN TO BE LESS
           THAN INDICATED

-------
       APPENDIX D

TRIBUTARY AND WASTEWATER
  TREATMENT PLANT DATA

-------
/ T v P 4 / i. >• K 1.1 T / <; T '-> '•: 4 • i
 3;: iJ <- A c
41 3"  40.(i  115 4?  30.n  it
OUYMfe'E •iiVf.rt
32       IS  *ILO HO*SE,
T/-ILU MjKSt StSCHVOl1*    13j.}3 TOT KjEL
VG/L
,,
}
n
'i
o
ij
0
0
0
i)
0
0
(j
0
11
.01'-
.•'J?4
.084
.IPS
.07^
.010
.115
.01-;
.Oln
. 0 9 n
. 045
. •) 1 u
.01^
.020
.015
MG/L
1 .
1.
0.
0.
0.
^.
2.
1.
1.
0.
1.
1.
0.
1.
0.
100
600
700
500
950
800
300
H50
500
45(1
750
250
350
500
500
OOMO
Mr-3— M (
TOTAL
MG/L
n.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
o.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
035
060
032
030
070
045
170
040
0*0
U30
155
045
020
030
025
00671 00^-65
•"nOS-UlS DHOs-TOT
O^THO
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
• n.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
>-
070
070
075
U85
115
04-0
135
140
105
045
050
155
080
140
095
vr,/L p
0.070
0.130
0.110
0.140
0.14Q
0.340
0.210
0.200
0.160
O.ObU
0.160
0.1 90
0.110
0.2*0
0.0«0

-------
 .,'•!!/  i / •>*
,   i IH >/t r
                                                       41  41 15.0  115  bo 40."  4
J2        IS  WILD
0/-II.O HO^SE HtStirivOI*    Ii074«?
HNtv  SAM  10(1 FT MM ri*V  A3 N«  TIC Dt-
lltPALFS              0^001004
 0000 KEKT   UF^TH  CLASS 00
                                                                                                 PFS
1 ..'
74/lf/l >
75//'"|^/(?'i
T^/'m/i?
/S/0*3/^4
7t>/06/07
7^/06/22
7^/07/20
7^/08/17
7t>/'i9/l "•)
7^/10/12
[ !'••£. jt*> r -
Ih
i'4< Ff-tr
1? ?o
12
1?
1 1
1 1
IS
15
15
15

12
11
11
11
12
45
00
01
40
0°
0')
00
00

nn
O'"1
00
35
0*
N-Tf.
VI (.
0
1)
0
0
0
0
u
(1
0
0
0
u
0
0
1)
N03 TOT KJtL
TAL N
/L MR/L
. 0«? 1.3SO
. 0 P 0 1.5QO
.0?4 2.?50
.005 4.300
.005 4 .600
.03=. 3.4bO
.270 1.500
.3"0
.220
.0?0
.080
.200
.070
.550
.f30
.0/5
.^00
. v5o
.luo
.020 O.Q09
.090 1.800
00*^10 OOiS 71
Nr'3-^ MHUb-l'IS f
TOT IL OWTMO
MG/L wfi/L H
0.174 0.0t«7
0.
0.
2
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
m
h50
000
40j
05(1
400
no
. i KO
, i 3b
1?0
, l*>0
,110
.240
,140
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
045
1H7
IS")
ItlO
155
136
110
080
14S
0^5
165
130
165
070
00
MR/
0
0
0
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
L r
.OBO
.630
.350
.700
.^20
.2flO
.230
.130
.175
.100
.?! 0
. IHO
.220
.110

-------
r^j-  ,_ A -  i/>:C-6S
• JiTt

 IT
                Ot-T-.
            Of
           lf>  Ot>
7c-/(i6X07
           16  30
           09  SP
7SXOHX17  10  1^
                         n . 71
MGXL  (-

  0.040
  0.080
  0.060
  0.040
  0.0^5
                                                                            41  37  O5.n
                                                                                                 .,5.0 4
                                                                         TXxIL'J HO'-JSE
                                                                         BKn s.s  MI b«  OF \
                                                                                                   04001004
                                                                                          utHTh   CLASS  00
                                                                      "(-OS-TOT
                       O.OhO
                                   0.100
                                   0.130
                                   O.OSO

-------
 t-~ <    . '  .,- - 1
• - a - ,_ t '.  v t J £ -
               r-»i i
 jf 0-»C 1
41 40  50.0  lib 4h  50.0 4
3x       15  "ILU -")*SE
T/wlLD Hf)t*SE  RfcSt*VOI*
HPUG  CM DwT hiO 3.3  «I NE
llEPfiLES              04001004
 fiOOO  FEET  LieHTH   CLftSS 00
F ** •' ( •*
T'l
7»/i 1/24
7ft/l 2/13
75/" j/2^
75/il4/l3
75/r>4/2ft
75/ J5/12
75/ri5/24
7H/06/07
7^/06/2?
7b/i!7/3<)
75/r>8/17
75/0-J/13
7^/1 0/12
ot-
1 1
11
11
15
15
15
15

Ir1
10
10
10
11
2-,
50
00
45
15
15
15

0"
20
4^.
55
17
hi;
1:
0
•J
0
0
0
0
0
n
0
0
0
0
f>J."j 00^25
N01 TOT KJtL
T &1_ N
/L MG/L
.00*
.030
.045
.015
.250
.130
.025
.030
.030
.010
.005
.020
.00^
1.
1.
0.
0.
0.
1.
1.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
1.
100
400
300
«50
900
750

-------
                              APPENDIX E

                     PARAMETRIC RANKINGS OF LAKES
                        SAMPLED BY NES IN 1975

                            STATE OF NEVADA
     Mean or median values for six of the key parameters evaluated
in establishing the trophic conditions of Nevada lakes sampled are
presented to allow direct comparison of the ranking, by parameter,
of each lake relative to the others.  Median total  phosphorus, median
inorganic nitrogen and median dissolved orthophosphorus levels are
expressed in mg/1. Chlorophyll a^ values are expressed in pg/1.  To
maintain consistent rank order with the preceding parameters,  the
mean Secchi disc depth, in inches, is subtracted from 500.   Similarly,
minimum dissolved oxygen values are subtracted from 15 to create
table entries.

-------
LAKE DATV FO SE USED IN RANKINGS
LAKE
CODE   LAKE NAME
3201   LAKE ?:EAD
3202   LAKOflTA.N RESERVOIR
3204   RYE PATCH RESERVOIR
3205   LAKE T^HOE
3206   TOPAZ RESERVOIR
3207   UPPER PAHRANGAT LAKE
3203   WASHOE LAKE
3209   WILD H3"SE RESERVOIR
3210   WILSON RESERVOIR
3211   WALKER LAKE
MEDIAN
TOTAL P
0.016
0.19S
0.094
0.005
0.057
0.173
0.403
0.114
.0.049
0.602
MEDIAN
li-JORG N
0.340
0.350
0.050
0.040
0.165
0.125
0.130
0.320
0.120
0.030
500-
MEPN SEC
266.565
472.033
467.750
-3.269
376.000
470.000
494.555
439.400
197.333
405.333
MEAN
CHLORA
3.111
4.508
4.933
0.571
7.517
—
11.633
75.530
10.033
3.422
15-
KIN DO
11.400
10.400
10.000
10.200
14.600
3.600
7.200
14.600
11.400
15.000
;:EDIA;<
DISS ORTHO P
0.005
0.143
O.C39
0.003
0.041
0.026
0.263
0.065
0.016
0.574

-------
PEP.CE:II OF LAXES UITH HIGHER VALUES ;::u:3ER OF LAKES ;;ITK HIGHER  VALUES)

LAKE
CCDE   LAKE NAME

3201   LAKE HEAD

3202   LAHOriTAN RESERVOIR

3204   RYE PATCH RESERVOIR

3205   LAKE TAKOE

3206   TOPAZ RESERVOIR

3207   UPPER PAHRANAGAT LAKE

3203   WASHOE LAKE

3209   WILD HORSE RESERVOIR

3210   WILSON RESERVOIR

3211 '  WALKER LAKE
i'.EDlA
TOTAL
89 (
22 (
56 (
100 (
67 (
23 (
11 (
44 (
73 (
0 (
N
P
£)
2)
5)
9)
6)
3)
1)
4)
7)
0)
MED I AM
INORG i
11 (
0 (
89 (
100 (
33 (
56 (
44 (
22 (
67 (
78 (
^
1)
0)
8)
9)
3)
5)
4)
2)
6)
7)
500-
riEAr: SEC
73 (
22 t
44 (
ICO (
67 (
33 (
0 (
11 (
89 (
56 (

7)
2)
4)
9)
6)
3)
0)
1)
8)
5)
::EAN
CHLORA
88 (
63 C
50 (
100 (
33 (
	
13 (
0 ('
25 (
75 (

7)
5)
4)
8)
3)

1)
0)
2)
5)
15-
MIN DO
39 (
56 (
78 (
67 (
17 (
89 (
100 (
17 (
39 (
0 (

3)
5)
7)
6)
1)
3)
9)
1)
3)
0)
DISS GR
89 (
22 (
55 (
100 (
44 (
67 (
11 (
33 (
78 (
0 C
r".i \
THO P
8)
2)
5)
9)
4)
5)
1)
3)
7)
0)

-------