U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
           NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
                    WORKING PAPER SERIES
                                        REPORT
                                          ON
                                   DEER CREEK RESERVOIR
                                     WASATCH COUNTY
                                         UTAH
                                     EPA REGION VI11
                                  WORKING PAPER No, 837
 CORVALLIS ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY - CORVALLIS, OREGON
                             and
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING & SUPPORT LABORATORY - LAS VEGAS, NEVADA

-------
                             REPORT
                               ON
                      DEER CREEK RESERVOIR
                         WASATCH COUNTY
                              UTAH
                        EPA REGION VI11
                     WORKING PAPER No, 837
 WITH THE COOPERATION OF THE
UTAH STATE DIVISION OF HEALTH
          AND THE
    UTAH NATIONAL GUARD
       OCTOBER, 1977

-------
                                   i

                               CONTENTS
                                                            Page
 Fc reward                                                     ii
 :.•;'«;; of Utah Stisdy Lakes and  Reservoirs                     iv
 ;.a<:-: s:;d Ora^ass Area Map                                    v
 :o   ?.a:
-------
                                 11
                          FOREWORD
    The National Eutrophication Survey was initiated in 1972 in
response to an Administration commitment to Investigate the nation-
wide threat of accelerated eutrophication to freshwater lakes and
reservoirs.

OBJECTIVES

    The Survey was designed to develop, in conjunction with state
environmental agencies, information on nutrient sources, concentrations,
and impact on selected freshwater lakes as a basis for formulating
comprehensive and coordinated national, regional, and state management
practices relating to point-source discharge reduction and non-point
source pollution abatement in lake watersheds.

ANALYTIC APPROACH

    The mathematical and statistical procedures selected for the
Survey's eutrophication analysis are based on related concepts that:

        a.  A generalized representation or model relating
    sources, concentrations, and impacts can be constructed.

        b.  By applying measurements of relevant parameters
    associated with lake degradation, the generalized model
    can be transformed into an operational representation of
    a lake, its drainage basin, and related nutrients.

        c.  With such a transformation, an assessment of the
    potential for eutrophication control can be made.

LAKE ANALYSIS

    In this report,  the first stage of evaluation of lake and water-
shed data collected from the study lake and its drainage basin is
documented.  The report is formatted to provide state environmental
agencies with specific information for basin planning [§303(e)], water
quality criteria/standards review [§303(c)],  clean lakes [§314(a,b)j,
and water quality monitoring [§106 and §305(b)] activities mandated
by the Federal  Water Pollution Control  Act Amendments of 1972.

-------
                                iii
     Beyond the single lake analysis, broader based correlations
between nutrient concentrations (and loading) and trophic condi-
tion are being made to advance the rationale and data base for
refinement of nutrient water quality criteria for the Nation's
fresh water lakes.  Likewise, multivariate evaluations for the
relationships between land use, nutrient export, and trophic
condition, by lake class or use, are being developed to assist
in the formulation of planning guidelines and policies by EPA
and to augment plans implementation by the states.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

     The staff of the National Eutrophication Survey (Office of
Research and Development, U.S. Environmental  Protection Agency)
expresses sincere appreciation to the Utah Department of Social
Services and the Utah Department of Natural  Resources for pro-
fessional involvement, to the Utah National  Guard for conducting
the tributary sampling phase of the Survey,  and to  those Utah
wastewater treatment plant operators who voluntarily provided
effluent samples and flow data.

     The staffs of the Bureau of Water Quality of the Division
of Health and the Division of Wildlife Resources provided inval-
uable lake documentation and counsel during  the Survey, reviewed
the preliminary reports, and provided critiques most useful  in
the preparation of this Working Paper series.

     Major General Maurice L. Watts, the Adjutant General of Utah,
and Project Officer Lt. Colonel T. Ray Kingston, who directed the
volunteer efforts of the Utah National  Guardsmen, are also grate-
fully acknowledged for their assistance to the Survey.

-------
                                  IV

                  NATIONAL EUTROPHI CATION SURVEY

                    STUDY LAKES AND RESERVOIRS
                          STATE OF UTAH
NAME
Bear
Deer Creek
Echo
Fish
F
-------
DEER  CREEK RESERVOIR
     Tributary Sampling Site
 X   Lake Sampling Site
     Sewage Treatment Facility
                          15

-------
                           DEER CREEK RESERVOIR
                             STORE! NO. 4903

I.  CONCLUSIONS
    A.  Trophic Condition:
            Survey data indicate that Deer Creek Reservoir is eutrophic.
        It ranked twentieth in overall  trophic quality among the 27 Utah
        lakes and reservoirs sampled in 1975 when compared using a com-
        bination of six water quality parameters*.   Fifteen of the water
        bodies had less median total phosphorus, ten had less and three had
        the same median dissolved orthophosphorus,  21  had less median inor-
        ganic nitrogen, 17 had less mean chlorophyll a, and 15 had greater
        mean Secchi disc transparency.   Marked depression of dissolved oxy-
        gen with depth occurred at sampling station 1  in August and September.
            Survey limnologists noted submerged macrophytes near the shore-
        line in August and clumps of algae at the surface in September, par-
        ticularly at sampling station 3.
    B.  Rate-Limiting Nutrient:
            The algal assay results indicate phosphorus limitation at the
        times the samples were collected (05/12/75 and 09/19/75).   The
        reservoir data also indicate phosphorus limitation in May and Sep-
        tember but nitrogen limitation at two of the three sampling stations
        in August.
* See Appendix A.

-------
                                 2
C.   Nutrient Controllability:
        1.   Point sources—During the sampling year,  point sources
    contributed 48.5% of the total phosphorus input to Deer Creek
    Reservoir.   The wastewater treatment facilities at Midway and
    Heber City accounted for 6.2% and 24.7%,  respectively.   The
    Clearview Trout Farm added 2.9%,  and the  Midway Fish  Hatchery
    contributed 14'.7%; however,  the proportion of these loads
    attributable to the hatchery operations is not known  since
    the quality of the waters  entering the  hatcheries was not
    measured.
        The present phosphorus loading of 2.47 g/m2/year  is 2.2 times
    that proposed by Vollenweider (Vollenweider and Dillon, 1974) as
    a eutrophic loading (see page 13).   Because the reservoir is phos-
    phorus  limited much of the time,  all  phosphorus inputs  should be
    minimized to the greatest practicable degree.   It is  calculated
    that the present phosphorus  loading would have to be  reduced 55%
    to achieve a level equal  to  the proposed  eutrophic loading.
        2.   Non-point sources—Non-point sources accounted for 51.5% of
    the total  phosphorus load during  the sampling year.   The Provo  River
    contributed 37.8%, and three other gaged  tributaries  collectively
    contributed 11.3%.  The ungaged minor tributaries and immediate
    drainage accounted for an estimated 1.7%  of the total  load.

-------
II.   RESERVOIR AND DRAINAGE BASIN CHARACTERISTICS1"

     A.   Morphometry  :

         1.   Surface area:   9.66 kilometers2.

         2.   Mean depth:   19.9  meters.

         3.   Maximum depth:  41.8 meters.

         4.   Volume:   192.301 x 106  m3.

         5.   Mean hydraulic retention time:  211 days  (based on outflow).

     B.   Tributary and Outlet:
         (See Appendix C  for flow data)

         1.   Tributaries  -

                                               Drainage       Mean flow
             Name                              area  (km2)*    (m3/sec)_*

             Provo River  (includes area &  flow
                          of Spring  Creek)         976.4         8.230
             Decker Creek                           4.7         0.011
             Snake Creek                             82.9         1.300
             Daniels  Creek                        126.9         0.100
             Main Creek                           186.5         0.375
              (Spring Creek)                      (150.2)       (0.510)
             Minor tributaries  &
              immediate drainage -                  63.3         0.660

                            Totals              1,440.7        10.676

         2.   Outlet -

             Provo River                         1,450.4**      10.540

     C.   Precipitation***:

         1.   Year of sampling:   123.1 centimeters.

         2.   Mean annual:   110.0 centimeters.
 t Table of metric  conversions—Appendix  B.
 tt Sudweeks,  1975;  max.  depth  from Ikner (1974).
 * For limits  of accuracy,  see  Working  Paper  No.  175,  "...Survey Methods,
   1973-1976".
 ** Includes area of reservoir.
 *** See Working Paper  No.  175.

-------
                                       4
III.   WATER QUALITY SUMMARY
      Deer Creek Reservoir was sampled three times during the open-
  water season of 1975 by means of a pontoon-equipped Huey helicopter.
  Each time, samples for physical  and chemical  parameters were collected
  from a number of depths at three stations on  the reservoir (see map,
  page v).   During each visit, a single depth-integrated (4.6 m or
  near bottom to surface) sample was composited from the stations
  for phytoplankton identification and enumeration;  and during the
  first and last visits, a single 18.9-liter depth-integrated sample
  was composited for algal assays.  Also each time,  a depth-integrated
  sample was collected from each of the stations for chlorophyll  _a
  analysis.  The maximum depths sampled were 35.1  -meters at station
  1,  24.4 meters at station 2, and 5.5 meters at station 3.
      The sampling results are presented in full  in  Appendix D and
  are summarized in the following table.

-------
     (0                5.0




DISS OXY (MG/L)         8.6




CNDCTYY (MC>       294.




PH (STAND UNITS)        8.3




TOT ALK (MG/D         136.




TOT P  (MG/L)          0.027




ORTHO P (MG/L)        0.006




N02*N03 (MG/L)        0.180




AMMONIA (MG/L)        0.030




KJEL N  (MG/L)         0.300




INORG N (MG/L)        0.210




TOTAL N (MG/L)        0.50C




CHLRPYL A (Ufi/L)        4.3




SECCHI  (METERS)         1.1
 A0  iU-l'-'ArSY  Of  PHYSICAL AND






 1ST  SAMPLING (  5/12/75)




       1 SITES




4NGL         MEAM   MEDIAN




     905     70*>     3.2




 "  11.0     9.7     9.7




    316.    306,    307.




     8.7     8.5     8.5




 -  149.    144.    145.




 - 0.054   0.040   0.042




 - 0.021   0.012   0.012




 - 0.270   0.213   0.200



 - 0.180   0.071   0.040




 - 0.600   0.464   0.450




 - 0.450   0.284   0.230




 - 0.870   0.677   0.675




     9.3     7.4     8.5




     l.d     1.5     1.8
     FC.i
           ER CPEEK S£SE«VOIR
STC.-JET COOE




          2MO SAMPL




                3 '-




        KANbE




    12.7  -  23.8




     2.6  -   9.0




    21b.  -  333.




     7.8  -   9.4




    106.  -  126.




   0.020  - 0.089




   0.002  - 0.058




   0.020  - 0.390




   0.020  - 0.040




   0.200  - 0.500




   0.040  - 0.410




   0.220  - 0.670




     1.3  -   1.5




     1.5  -   2.1
»NC3 \  8/M/75)



ires



  MEAN   MEDIAE



  19^,6    22.4



           6.7



          297.



           8.4




          115.



         0.040



         0.006




         0.060



         0.020
  6.1




 283.




  8.5




 115.




0.040



0.017




0.170




0.022




0.329   0.350




0.192   0.110




0.499




  1.4
                                                                                                          3RO SAMPLING  (  9/19/75)



                                                                                                                3 SITES
   1.9
0.505



  1.3



  2.1
     RAKGt



 :3s3  -  18.8



  0.2  -  10.4



 223.  -  338.



  7.5  -   8.8



 120S  -  158.



0.014  - 0.285



0.002  - 0.069



0.030  - 0.440



0.020  - 0.270



0.200  - 0.800




0.050  - 0.510



0.380  - 1.040



 11.6  -  25.2



  0.9  -   2.7
ME Aft
17.6
6.7
298.
8.2
143.
0.055
0.010
0.159
0.044
0.406
0.203
0.566
18.5
l.ri
KEjIAN
18.2
S.O
303.
8.3
145.
0.035
0.004
0.140
0.020
0.400
0.160
0.530
18.7
1.8

-------
B.
Biological Characteristics:
1.  Phytoplankton -
Sampling
Date
05/12/75
08/11/75
09/19/75
Domi nant
Genera
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1.
2.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Stephanodiscus sp.
Chroomonas sp.
Flagellates
Cryptomonas sp.
Asterionella sp.
Total
Fragilaria sp.
Sphaerocystis sp_.
Total
Aphanizomenon sp.
Chroomonas sp.
Flagellates
Stephanodiscus sp.
Coelosphaerium sp.
Other genera
Algal Units
per ml
5,047
3,426
2,100
700
74
11,347
7,571
55
7,626
2,365
377
240
69
69
102
    2»   Chlorophyll  a_ -
                                          Total
                                                           3,222
Sampling
Dato
05/12/75
08/11/75
09/19/75
Station
Number
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
Chlorophyll a
faig/1 )
8.5
9.3
4.3
1.5
1.3
1.3
11.6
18.7
25.2

-------
C.   Limiting Nutrient Study:
    1.   Autoclaved,  filtered,  and nutrient spiked -
        a.   May sample -
        Spike (rng/1)
        Control
        0.050 P
        0.050 P  + 1.0 N
        1.0 N
        b.   September sample -
Ortho P
Cone, (mg/1)
Inorganic N    Maximum yield
Cone, (mg/1)   (mg/1-dry wt.)
0.015
0.065
0.065
0.015
0.299
0.299
1.299
1.299
3.3
11.7
20.5
2.0
        Spike (mg/1)
        Control
        0.050 P
        0.050 P  + 1.0 N
        1.0 N
Ortho P
Cone, (mg/1)
   0.010
   0.060
   0.060
   0.010
Inorganic N    Maximum yield
Cone, (mg/1)   (mg/1-dry wt.)
    0.185
    0.185
    1.185
    1.185
 1.0
 7.1
22.3
 1.0
    2.   Discussion -
            The control  yields  of the assay alga,  Selenastrum capri-
        cornutum,  indicate the  potential  primary productivity of Deer
        Creek Reservoir  was moderately high at the times  the  samples
        were collected.   Also,  in both assays  the significant increase
        in yields  with the addition of phosphorus  alone indicates the
        reservoir  was limited by phosphorus at those  times.   Note that
        the addition of  nitrogen alone in both assays resulted in yields
        no greater than  those of the controls.
            The reservoir data  indicate phosphorus limitation in May
        and September as well;  i.e., the  mean  inorganic nitrogen/ortho-

-------
                         8
phosphorus ratios were 16/1 or greater at all  stations in May
and 13/1 or greater at all stations in September.   However,
nitrogen limitation is indicated at two of the three stations
in August; i.e., the mean N/P ratios were 9/1  at station 1 and
5/1 at station 3.  The mean N/P ratio was 21/1 at station 2 in
August, and phosphorus limitation would be expected.

-------
IV.   NUTRIENT LOADINGS
     (See Appendix E for data)
     For the determination of nutrient loadings,  the Utah National
 Guard collected monthly near-surface grab samples  from each of the
 tributary sites indicated on the map (page v), except for the  high
 runoff months of ^ay and June  when two samples were collected.
 Sampling was begun in November,  1974,  and was completed in October,
 1975.
     Through an interagency agreement,  stream flow  estimates for the
 year of sampling and a "normalized" or average year were provided  by
 Lha Utah District Office of the  U.S. Geological  Survey for the
 tributary sites nearest the reservoir.
     Except for Snake and Decker  creeks,  nutrient loads for sampled
 tributaries were determined by using a modification of a U.S.  Geological
 Survey computer program for calculating stream loadings*.   Nutrient loads
 shown are those measured minus point-source loads,  if any.
     The combined nutrient loads  of the Midway wastewater treatment plant
 and the Midway Fish Hatchery exceeded the loads  measured in Snake  Creek at
 station O'l; a^id, although Decker Creek was sampled nine times at  station
 B-ls most of the flows were too  low to be measured accurately.   Therefore,
 the loads for these streams and  the unsampled "minor tributaries and
 immediate drainage" ("II" of U.S.G.S.)  were estimated using the means  of
 tSis nutrient loads, in kg/km2/year, at stations  D-l and E-l  and multiplying
 the means by the B~l, C-l, and ZZ areas in km2.
 * See Working Paper No.  175.

-------
                                     10
    Also, the nutrient loads measured in Spring Creek at station F-l
are included in the Provo River loads at station A-2 and, hence, are
not listed separately in the loading tables that follow.
    The operators of the Heber City and Midway wastewater treatment
plants provided monthly effluent samples and corresponding flow data,
a;;c! the personnel of Clearview Trout Farm and the Midway Fish Hatchery
provided monthly discharge samples and corresponding flows.
    A.  Waste Sources*:
        L  Known municipal -
Name
Hsber City
Midway
Pop.
Served
3,000
1,000
Treatment
tr. filter
tr. filter
Mean Flow
(mVd)
9,490.0
1,106.9
Recei vi ng
Water
Spring Creek/
Provo River
Snake Creek
        2o  Known Industrial - None
        3.  Fish hatcheries -
N
C
M
are
Isarview
Farm
Idway F1
Hatchery
Trout
sh
Type
Waste
fish prop-
agation
fish prop-
agation
Treatment
none
none
Mean Flow
(mVd)
11
76
s
>
255.
200.
3
2
Receiving
Water
Provo
Snake
River
Creek
••* Hopkins and Hinshaw, 1974.

-------
                                    11
    B.  Annual Total Phosphorus Loading - Average Year:
        1.  Inputs -
                                              kg P/          % of
            Source                            y_r	          total
            a.  Tributaries (non-point load) -
                S;rovo River                    9,005          37.8
                Decker Creek                      30           0.1
                Snake Creek                      540           2.3
                Daniels Creek                    760           3.2
                Main Creek                     1,380           5.8
            b.  Minor tributaries & immediate
                 drainage (non-point load) -     410           1.7
            GO  Known municipal STP's -
                Heber City                     5,875          24.6
                Midway                         1,485           6.2
            d»  Septic tanks - Unknown           ?
            e0  Known industrial - None
            f.  Fish hatcheries -
                Clearview Trout Farm             695           2.9
                Midway Fish Hatchery           3,500          14.7
            o.  Direct precipitation* -          170           0.7
                        Total                  23,850         100.0
        2,   Outputs -
            Lake cutlet - Provo River         15,605
        3o   Net annual P accumulation - 8,245 kg.
* Sea Werkiiig Fapar No. 175.

-------
                                    12
    C.  Annual Total Nitrogen Loading - Average Year:
        1.  Inputs -
                                              kg N/          % of
            Source                            y_r	          total
            a.  Tributaries (non-point load) -
                Provo River                   199,385         64.0
                Decker Creek                      240          0.1
                Snake Creek                     4,270          1.4
                Daniels Creek                   4,405          1.4
                Main Creek                     12,655          4.1
            b.  Minor tributaries & immediate
                 drainage (non-point load) -    3,260          1.0
            c.  Known municipal STP's -
                Heber City                     25,030          8.0
                Midway                          4,680          1.5
            d.  Septic tanks - Unknown            ?
            e.  Known industrial - None
            f.  Fish hatcheries -
                Clearview Trout Farm            6,190          2.0
                Midway Fish Hatchery           40,810         13.1
            g.  Direct precipitation* -        10.430          3.3
                        Total                  311,355        100.0
        2.  Outputs -
            Lake outlet - Provo River         242,720
        3.  Net annual N accumulation - 68,635 kg.
    D.  Non-point Nutrient Export by Subdrainage Area:
        Tributary                             kg P/km2/yr    kg N/km2/yr
        Provo River                                9            204
        Daniels Creek                              6             35
        Main Creek                                 7             68
* See Working Paper No.  175.

-------
                                13
E.  Mean Nutrient Concentrations in Estimated or Unlisted Streams:
                                      Mean Total  P       Mean Total  N
    Tributary                         Cone,  (mg/1)       Cone,  (mg/1)
    Decker Creek                              0.059         0.324
    Snake Creek                               0.090         1.282
    Spring Creek                              0.300         1.492
F.  Yearly Loads:
        In the following table,  the existing phosphorus  loadings
    are compared to those proposed by Vollenweider (Vollenweider
    and Dillon, 1974).   Essentially, his  "dangerous"  loading is
    one at which the receiving water would become eutrophic  or
    remain eutrophic;  his "permissible"  loading  is that  which
    would result in the receiving water  remaining oligotrophic
    or becoming oligotrophic if  morphometry permitted.   A meso-
    trophic loading would be considered  one between "dangerous"
    and "permissible".
        Note that Vollenweider's model may not be applicable to
    water bodies with short hydraulic retention  times.
                              Total  Phosphorus       Total Nitrogen
    	Total    Accumulated     Total   Accumulated
    grams/mVyr             2.47      0.85        32.2        7.1
    Vollenweider phosphorus  loadings
     (g/m2/yr)  based on mean depth and  mean
     hydraulic  retention time of Deer Creek  Reservoir:
        "Dangerous"   (eutrophic loading)             1.12
        "Permissible"  (oligotrophic  loading)        0.56

-------
                                14

LITERATURE REVIEWED

Anderson, Donald R., John A. Dracup, Thomas J. Fogarty, and Robert
    Willis; 1976.  Water quality modeling of deep reservoirs.
    Jour. Water Poll. Contr. Fed.  48 (1): 134-146.

Hopkins, Clyde M., and R. Hinshaw, 1974.  Personal communications
    (treatment plant questionnaires).  UT Bur. of Env. Health, Salt
    Lake City.

Ikner, James, 1975.  Personal communication (max. depth of Deer
    Creek Res.).  U.S. Geol. Surv., Salt Lake City.

Sudweeks, Calvin K., 1974.   Personal communication (reservoir mor-
    phometry).  UT Bur. of Env. Health, Salt Lake City.

Vollenweider, R. A., and P. J. Dillon,  1974.  The application of
    the phosphorus loading concept to eutrophication research.
    Natl. Res. Council of Canada Publ.  No.  13690, Canada Centre
        inland Waters, Burlington, Ontario.

-------
 15
 APPENDIX A
LAKE RANKINGS

-------
LAKE DATA YO E£ USEO IN RANKINGS
LAKE
CuDE  LAKE
&403  LAKE POWELL
4931  BEAR LAKE
49y2  LOa'ER BOWN'S RESERVOIR
49J3  DEER CREEK RESERVOIR
4904  ECHO RESERVOIR
4905  LYNN RESERVOIR
4906  FISH LAKE
4907  HUNTINGTON NORTH RESERVO
4903  JOE'S VALLEY RESERVOIR
4',C9  *IMERSVILLE RESERVOIR
49 iw  M;,GN LAKE
49 ii  NAVAJO LAKE
4912  NEWCASTLE RESERVOIR
4913  OTTER CREEK RESERVOIR
4914  PANSUITCH LAKE
*.*i5  PELICAN LAKE
491&  PINEVIEW RESERVOIR
4917  PIUTE RESERVOIR
49i3  PORCUPINE RESERVOIR
4919  PRLJESS RESERVOIR (GARRIS
4920  SEVIER BRIDGE RESERVOIR
4921  STARVATION RESERVOIR
4922  STEINAKSR RESERVOIR
4923  TROPIC RESERVOIR
4924  UTAH LAKE
4925  WILLAKO 8AY RESERVOIR
5605  FLAMING GORGE RESERVOIR
MEDIAN
TOTAL P
0.0^0
C.Ola
0.031
O.C38
0.047
0.121
C.023
C.OI3
0.012
0.192
0.008
0.016
0.051
0.067
0.071
0.044
0.028
0.047
0.025
0.057
0.026
0.016
0.011
C.021
0.132
0.044
0.011
MEDIAN
INORS N
0.410
0.040
0.0'*0
0.215
0.170
0.200
0.040
0.040
0.045
0.060
0.040
0.040
0.040
0.040
0.040
0.050
0.300
0.150
0.110
0.140
0.355
0.040
0.040
0.050
0.320
0.060
0.690
589-
MF.AN SEC
339.830
253.167
336.050
430.333
450.333
417.667
152.000
392.000
400.000
445.000
381.000
363.000
428.667
453.667
426.500
438.500
435.083
482.625
440.000
491.000
449.778
394.583
316.750
425.000
490.583
457.182
285.636
MEAN
CHLORA
3.0S1
0.945
5.567
9.D78
6.967
39.600
12.483
1.900
2.483
33.583
2.700
2.000
12.467
11.767
45.950
6.350
5.692
25.329
7.860
4.533
18.222
5.675
1.844
7.200
72.012
7.567
2.500
15-
H!N DO
13.800
9.200
9.400
14.800
14.000
10.400
10.400
7.800
11.200
8.600
9.600
6.000
13.600
10.600
14.200
8.400
14.600
11.600
12.400
8.800
12.400
13.200
12.600
8.400
11.400
11.000
10.400
MEDIAN
01 SS ORTHO P
0.007
0.003
0.006
0.006
0.012
0.052
0.004
0.005
0.003
0.107
0.002
0.003
0.009
0.033
0.010
0.004
0.006
0.007
0.011
0.008
0.008
0.004
0.005
0.006
0.012
0.009
0.003

-------
        OF LAKES toZ7fi HIGhFR  VALUES  (NUMBER  OF  LAK5.S  WJTH HIGHER VALUES)
CO^c.  LAKE



040 d  LA.<£ P



4901  BEAR LAKE



-*9i2  LOrfER «OsN'S RESERVOIR



4>;,,3  OSES CREEK RESERVOIR



4904  ECHO RESERVOIR



49CS  LYfvlN RESERVOIR



4906  FISH LAKE



4907  HU.NTINGTO!.- NORTH RESERVO



4905  JOE'S VALLEY RESERVOIR



49u3  MINERSVILLE RESERVOIR



491C  MOON LAKE



4911  MAVAJO LAKE



4912  NEWCASTLE RESERVOIR



4913  OTTER CREEK RESERVOIR



<*9l4  PA^HUITCH LAKE



4915  PELICAN LA;5
4 <
87 i
87 «
19 «
27 (
23 <
65 <
65 (
53 (
44 (
87 (
87 (
87 (
87 (
65 <
54 <
15 (
31 (
38 <
35 (
8 <
87 (
87 <
50 (
12 <
44 (
0 (
I)
19>
19)
S>
7)
6)
16i
16)
15)
11)
19)
19)
19)
19)
16)
14)
4)
8)
10)
9)
2)
19)
19)
13)
3)
11)
0)
500°
MEAN
•31
96
85
42
19
58
100
69
62
27
73
77
46
IS
50
35
38
8
31
0
23
65
88
54
4
12
92
SEC
( 21)
< 25)
{ 22)
( 11)
( 5)
( 15)
( 26)
( 18)
( 16)
( 7) '
( 19)
{ 20)
( 12)
( 4)
( 13)
( 9)
( 10)
( 2)
( 8)
< 0).
( 6>
( 17)
< 23)
( 14)
( 1)
( 3)
( 24)
MEAN
CHLGfiA
73 (
100 i
65 !
35 I
50 I
8 (
23 I
92 (
85 <
12 i
77 i
88 <
27 i
31 i
4 <
54 i
58 i
15 '
38 i
69 i
19 <
62 i
96 i
46
0 '
42 i
81 i
1 19)
I 26)
! 17)
t 9)
! 13)
1 2)
[ 6)
I 24)
1 22)
! 3)
1 20)
t 23)
i 7)
I 8)
I 1)
t 14)
t 15)
( 4)
( 10)
[ 18)
I 5)
( 16)
( 25)
( 12)
t 0)
t ID
I 21)
X5-
nZi
DISS GRTKO P Nv)
42 1
90 i
SO <
58 I
13 1
4 (
79 (
69 i
96 (
0 I
100 i
85 i
27 (
8 <
23 i
73 i
58 i
46 i
19 i
37 i
37 i
79 i
65 '
58
13 i
31
90 '
: .ID
! 23)
I 13)
I 14)
1 3)
E 1)
! 20)
t 18)
I 25)
I 0)
I 26)
I 22)
1 7)
( 2)
( 6)
( 19)
I 14)
( 12)
[ 5)
( 9)
t 9)
t 20)
t 17)
( 14)
( 3)
( 8)
( 23)
311
540
406
196
152
163
391
468
428
166
506
506
229
210
162
343
223
165
217
241
174
389
448
363
75
216
415

-------
LAKES k1 A:\.-.EJ- ~Y iN'OEx WOS.




8A?..<  LAKE CODE  LAKE N«M£                INDEX NO






   i  4*0!       c£AS LAKE                   540




   2  491;       NAVAJO LAKE                 506




   3  -,910       HOONi LAX£                   506




   t  4v07       nUNTlNSTON NiOftT.-l  RESERVO   468




   5  ^922       STEINAKER RESERVOIR        448



   6  <'90a       JOE'S VALLEY  RESERVOIR     428



   7  5i.05       FLAWING  GORGE RESERVOIR    415




   &  ^9C2       LCn.'cS bOWN'S  RESERVOIR     406



   9  ^-JOc,       flSH LAKE                   391



  1C  ^v2i       STARVATION RESERVOIR       389




  II  -v2C       TROPIC F(£SERVGIR            363



  12  49IS       PELICAN  LAKE                343



  13  0408       LAKE POWELL                 3il



  14  4919       PRUESS RESERVOIR  (GARRIS   241




  IS  4912       NEWCASTLE RESERVOIR        229




  ifc  -.-^16       rT'jEVIEW RESERVOIR         223




  17  4013       PORCUPINE RESERVOIR        217




  IS  4C2S       KlLLARD  SAY RESERVOIR      216




  i<)  ^<-;i3       CTTE3 CREEK RESERVOIR      210




  20  4v03       DEER CREEK RESERVOIR       196




  21  <*920       SEVIER BRIDGE RESERVOIR    174




  ::?.  ^>-:9       HITJEKSVILLE RESERVOIR      168




  2o  49i?       PIUTE RESERVOIR            165



  24  4vOS       LYNN' RESERVOIR             163




  25  4914       ?A\aUITCH LAKE             162




  25  49D-       ECHO RESERVOIR             152




  27  4924       UTAH LAKE                    75

-------
    APPENDIX B





CONVERSION FACTORS

-------
                CONVERSION FACTORS




Hectares x 2.471 = acres


Kilometers x 0.6214 = miles


Meters x 3.281 = feet

                         -4
Cubic meters x 8.107 x 10   = acre/feet


Square kilometers x 0.3861 = square miles


Cubic meters/sec x 35.315 = cubic feet/sec


Centimeters x 0.3937 = inches

  •

Kilograms x 2.205 s pounds

                         T

Kilograms/square kilometer x 5.711 = Ibs/square mile

-------
    APPENDIX C
TRIBUTARY FLOW DATA

-------
                                   TRIBUTARY F(_0w  INFORMATION FOR UTAH
                                                                        10/18/76
LAKt CODE
DEER CRK RES
     TOTAL .JHAINAGE AREA OF LAKE (SO KM)
          SUH-ORAINAGE
TRIBUTARY  AREA
  JUN     JUL      AUG
                                                                                           SEP
OCT
                                                                                        NOV
                                                                          OEC
                                                                    SUMMARY
     TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA OF LAKE =
     SUM OF SUB-DRAINAGE ARLAS   =
                                                          1600.1
                                     TOTAL FLOW IN
                                     TOTAL FLOW OUT
                                                                                                    134. 04
     MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS(CMS)

TRIBUTARY   MONTH   YEAR    MEAN FLOW  DAY

4903A1
                                FLO*  DAY
                           FLOW   DAY
                                      FLOW
4903A2
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
4.757
9.203
8.164
5.947
3.710
10.024
12.856
40.068
22.342
15.574
13.819
6.768
5.097
3.681
3.964
3.964
4.531
5.380
21.521
40.210
14.725
5.947
3.964
5.947
10
14
11
8
8
5
3
7
12
16
13
5
10
14
11
8
8
5
3
7
12
9
13
4
3.030
10.845
8.269
8.240
2.520
10.137
9.713 17
46.723 21
28.883
16.509
14.696
11.327
4.814
4.i?14
4.248
4.?48
4.814
4.814
7.929 17
62.297 21
25.485
9.061
6.230
4.814






15.886
44.457










40.493
33.980




                                                                        MEAN
4903A1
4903Ai
490331
4903C1
490 3D!
490 3E I
4903F1
490J.9
186.5
150.2
7?. 5
6.80
3.40
0.003
1.19
0.113
0.263
0.14
0.42
6.80
3.4Q
0.003
1.16
0.142
0.396
0.14
0.42
7.36
4.35
0.003
1.27
0.142
0.481
0.17
0.51
8.78
10.48
0.011
1.30
0.340
1.048
0.54
0.82
16.42
28.32
0.037
I.b9
0.227
1.104
1.61
1.70
24.35
25.20
0.037
1.67
0.028
0.311
1.73
1.70
15.01
6.80
0.017
1.27
0.003
0.102
0.74
0.54
12.18
3.40
0.008
1.10
0.006
0.088
0.31
0.31
10.19
2.83
0.006
1.10
0.011
0.091
0.23
0.28
5.95
3.11
0.006
1.30
0.028
0.139
0.20
0.34
5.38
3.68
0.003
l.Jfo
0.085
0.232
0.17
0.45
7.08
3.68
0.003
1.25
0.085
0.246
0.14
0.45
10.54
8.23
0.011
1.30
0.100
0.375
0.51
0.66

-------
                                    TRIBUTARY FLQK  INF0>"'UAT ION  FOR  UTAH
                                                                                             10/IS/76
LAKE C00£
                    GEE*  CRC.  ">ES
     ME'-N MONTHLY  FLO«S  AND JAIL* FLOWS(CMS)

TRIB^TA^Y    MONTH    YEAf<    MEAN FLOW  DAY

490 Jdi
4903C1
490301
 4903cl
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.028
0.076
0.051
0.017
0.008
0.006
1.982
1.133
1.133
1.416
1.699
2.265
1.699
2.549
1.133
0.850
0.850
1.416
0.113
0.085
0.113
0.113
0.198
0.368
0.368
0.003
0.011
0.017
0.113
0.198
0.142
0.227
0.227
0.283
0.283
0.538
1.614
0.481
0.340
0.227
0.170












10
14
11
8
d
5
3
7
12
9
13
5
10
14

8
5
3
7
12
9
13
5
10
14
11
8
8
5
3
7
12
9
13
5
FLO*  DAY
                  FLOW   DAY
                                     FLOW
.671
.444
.396
.472
.812
2.010
2.152
2.832
2.237
1.048
1.161
1.104
0.963
0.085
0.113
0.198
0.198
0.991
0.003
0.014
0.023
0.028
0.198
0.170
0.227
0.227
0.283
0.227
0.311
1.699
0.566
0.368
0.255
0.170






17
21








17
21










17
21




                                                                      2.067
                                                                      2.832
                                                                      0.368
                                                                      0.283
                                                                       0.510
                                                                       1.133

-------
                                                 rcH UTA*
                                                              DAY
ti      r*         a. IT®
12      ?*•         0.142
 1      T5         C.IA2
 Z      T5         fl.l*2
 3      75         «.l*2
 **      75         0.173
 S      75         1.274
 «      75         3.398
 1      75         2.265
 8      75         6.T36
 »      75         S.425
I*      75         0.255
It      74         3.566
12      74         0.368
 1      75         0.425
 2      75         0.453
 3      75         0.566
 *      75         e.623
 5      T5         1.642
 6      75         2.718
 1      75         1.019
 8      75         0.425
 9      75         0.340
U      75         0.510

-------
        APPENDIX D





PHYSICAL and CHEMICAL DATA

-------
STC-^T PETRIFVAL DATE  7o/03/l2
D-TE
TO
75/05/12





75/03/1 I





75/09/19






COO 10
TIVF DEPTH »ATER
OF TEMP
UAY FEET
16 40 0000
16 40 0005
16 40 0025
16 40 0050
16 40 0075
16 40 0106
15 05 0000
15 05 0005
15 05 0020
15 05 0050
15 05 0085
15 05 Ollb
14 15 0000
14 15 0005
14 15 0015
14 15 0030
14 15 0050
14 15 0080
14 15 0115
CENT
a. 5
8.4
7.6
6.6
5.4
5.0
?3. 1
23.2
22. S
15.4
13.1
12.7
18.4
18. <*
17.9
17.8
17.8
15.3
13.3
00300
DO
MG/L
10.4
10.4
9.8
9.2
8.8
fl.6
7.2
7.0
6.4
3.8
3.2
2.6
8.0
8.0
7.2
7.0
6.2
1.0
0.2
                                           00077
                                          SECCHI    FIELO
                                          INCHES    M]

                                               72
                                               84
                                              108
                                                                   490JO 1
                                                                  40 24 J5.0 111 31 20.0 3
                                                                  DEEP CREEK RESERVOIR
                                                                                           150791
                                                                  11EPALES             2111202
                                                                   0110 FEET  DEPTH  CLASS 00
94
TVY
1
•MHO
315
315
305
301
297
294
300
294
290
218
228
238
301
300
300
300
300
248
223
00400
PH

SO
8.65
8.70
8.60
8.40
8.35
8.30
8.70
8.60
8.20
7.90
7.80
7.80
8.45
8.40
8.30
8.10
8.00
7.60
7.50
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
145
145
147
149
148
148
115
116
115
113
112
114
143
145
142
141
141
126
120
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.040
0.040
0.080
0.120
0.130
0.180
0.020K
0.020
0.040
0.020K
0.020
0.020
0.020K
0.020K
0.020K
0.020K
0.020K
0.040
0.270
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.400
0.500
0.600
0.500
0.400
0.600
0.400
0.400
0.400
0.300
0.200K
0.200K
0.400
0.400
0.300
0.200
0.200
0.300
0.800
00630
N02fcN03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.190
0.190
0.210
0.250
0.270
0.270
0.070
0.070
0.090
0.370
0.380
0.390
0.130
0.130
0.150
0.180
0.200
0.440
0.240
00671
PHOS-OIS
OHTriO
MG/L P
0.006
0.006
0.011
0.013
0.014
0.021
0.008
0.005
0.007
0.044
0.050
0.058
0.004
0.003
0.002
0.002
0.004
0.024
0.069
           *  VALUE  rv^OWN  TO  BE
           LESS  THAN  INDICATED

-------
SETRIF.VAL DATE 76/os/i?
                                                           490301
                                                          40  24 35.0 111  31  20.0
                                                          DtEW  CREEK RESERVOIR
                                                          49051   UTAH
                                                                                   150791
                                                          11EPAUES
                                                           0110  FEET
DEPTH
  2111202
CLASS 00
00665 32217 00031
DATE TIME DEPTH PHOS-TOT CHLRPHYL liMCOT LT
FkuM OF A HEMMING
TO DAY FEET
7S/Ob/12 16
16
16
16
16
16
75/0 es/ 11 15
15
15
15
15
15
75/09/19 14
14
14
14
14
14
14
40
40
40
40
40
40
05
05
05
05
05
05
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
0000
0005
0025
0050
0075
0106
0000
0005
0020
0050
0085
0115
0000
0005
0015
0030
0050
0080
0115
MG/L P
0.
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.
0,
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0,
0,
0.
fl<
0,
0,
.036
,044
.041
.032
.030
.054
,oae
.020
.020
.046
.066
.089
.019
.017
.016
.016
,OU
.087
.285
OG/L PERCENT
8.5





1.5





11.6







-------
                                                         490302
                                                        40 2t> 04.0 111 28 48.0 3
                                                        0£E» CREEK KE5ERVOIR
                                                        49051   UTAH
                                                        11EPALES             2111202
                                                         0071 FEET  DEPTH  CLASS 00

DATE
FRO'1
TO
75/05/12




75/08/11




75/09/19






DATE
FROM
TO
7b/u5/12




75/08/11




7b/09/l9






TIME OEPT-i
OF
DAY FEET
16 10 0000
16 10 0005
16 10 0025
16 10 0050
16 10 0071
14 40 0000
14 40 0005
14 40 0020
14 40 0045
14 40 ooao
13 35 0000
13 35 0003
13 35 0015
13 35 0030
13 35 0050
13 35 0071

TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY F£ET
16 10 0000
16 10 0005
16 10 0025
16 10 0050
16 10 0071
14 40 0000
14 40 0005
14 40 0020
14 40 0045
14 40 0080
13 35 0000
13 35 0005
13 35 OC15
13 35 0030
13 35 0050
13 35 0071
00010
«ATER
TLMP
CENT
9.0
8.6
8.1
6.1
5.4
?3.3
23. d
21.3
16. 1
12.9
18.7
Its. 7
18.3
18.3
17.5
16.6
00665
PHOS-TOT

Mu/L P
0.046
0.035
0.027
0.028
0.045
C.024
0,025
0.020
0.045
0.052
C.039
0.033
0.033
0.037
0.030
0.099
00300
00

MG/L
10.4
10.4
9.6
9.0
11.0
7.P
7.2
5.8
4.4
4.8
9.0
9.0
8.2
8.6
3.6
3.4
32217
CHLRPHYL
A
UG/L
9.3




1.3




18.7





00077 00094
TRANSP CNDuCWr
SECCHI FIELD
INCHES MICHOMHO
69 316
315
308
298
295
84 314
313
30S
244
223
72 304
302
303
308
321
338
00031
INGOT LT
REMNING
PERCENT
















00400
PH

su
8.65
8.65
8.45
8.35
8.65
8.70
8.80
8.13
7.95
8.10
8.50
8.50
8.50
8.00
7.70
7.80




















00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
143
143
147
148
143
117
116
121
106
106
146
142
146
147
151
158




















00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
Mu/L
0.030
0.030
0.100
0.120
0.030
0.020
0.020
0.030
0.020K
0.020K
0.020K
0.020K
0.020K
0.030
0.040
0.100




















00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.500
0.600
0.500
0.400
0.400
0.400
0.400
0.400
0.300
0.300
0.400
0.500
0.500
0.500
0.400
0.400




















00630
N02&.N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.180
0.180
0.220
0.240
0.190
0.050
0.050
0.140
0.350
0.360
0.070
0.070
0.070
0.150
0.350
0.280




















00671
PHOS-DIS
0-fTriO
Mu/L P
0.011
0.010
0.013
0.011
0.006
0.004
0.00*
0.002
0.013
0.029
0.002
0.004
O.U03
0.003
0.004
0.019




















K VALUE KiMOtfN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED

-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 76/08/12
                                                                  490303
                                                                 40 28 06.0 111 29 58.0 3
                                                                 DEER CREEK RESERVOIR
                                                                 49051   UTAH

DATE TIME DEPTH
FROM OF
TO DAY FEET
75/05/12 15 50 0000
15 50 0005
15 50 0012
75/08/11 14 20 0000
14 20 0005
14 20 0014
75/09/19 13 15 0000
13 15 0005
13 15 0018
00010
HATER
TEMP
CENT
9.5
9.3
8.5
23.2
23.8
22.3
18^8
18.3
18.2
                                00300     00077     00094
                                 DO      TRANSP   CNDUCTVY
                                         SECCHI   FIELD
                                MG/L     INCHES   MICROMHO
                                   9.6
                                   9.8
                                   9.0
                                   8.8
                                   9.0
                                   8.1
                                  10.4
                                   9.0
                                   9.0
42


60


36
310
306
307
333
331
330
311
305
303
11EPALES
2111202
0016 FEET DEPTH CLASS
00400
PH

SU
8.55
a. so
8.50
9.00
9.40
9.40
8.80
8.70
8.70
00*10
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
138
136
136
114
114
126
146
146
145
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.020K
0.020K
0.020K
0.020
0.020
0.020K
00
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.400
0.400
0.300
0.200
0.200K
0.500
0.400
0.400
0.400

00630
N024N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.190
0.200
0.200
0.020K
0.020K
0.020K
0.030
0.030
0.030

00671
PHOS-D1S
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.015
0.014
0.013
0.003
0.004
0.006
0.004
0.004
0.003

DATE
FROM
TO
75/05/12


75/0 8/11


75/09/19



TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
15 50 0000
15 50 0005
15 50 0012
14 20 0000
14 ?0 0005
14 20 0014
13 15 0000
13 15 0005
13 15 0018
00665
PHOS-TOT

MG/L P
0.052
0.045
0.048
0.042
0.045
0.038
0.050
0.050
0.051
32217
CHLRPHYL
A
JG/L
4.3


1.3


25.2


00031
INCDT LT
REMNING
PERCENT









          K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
          LESS THAN INDICATED

-------
       APPENDIX E

TRIBUTARY AND WASTEWATER
  TREATMENT PLANT DATA

-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 76/08/12
  DATE   TIME DEPTH
  FROM    OF
   TO    DAr  FEET
74/11/10
74/13/14
75/01/11
75/02/08
75/03/08
75/04/05
75/05/03
75/05/17
75/06/07
75/06/21
75/07/12
75/08/16
75/09/13
75/10/05
13 00
10 00
09 40
10 00

09 30
09 15
10 00
09 45
10 00
10 10
08 50
12 30
09 30
                                                                  4903A1
                                                                 40 24 16.0 111 31 42.0 4
                                                                 KKQVG KlVtK
                                                                 49      7.5 ASPEN GROVE
                                                                 0/DEEK CREEK RESERVOIR   150791
                                                                 GAGE STATN .2 MI S OF DEER CREEK DAM
                                                                 11EPALES             2111204
                                                                  0000 FEET  DEPTH  CLASS 00
10630
!&N03
•OTAL
IG/L
0.216
0.272
0.432
0.504
C.480
0.480
0.220
0.230
0.220
0.190
0.155
0.375
0.375
0.170
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.600
0.600
0.800
0.200
0.600
0.350
0.350
0.150
0.450
0.450
0.250
0.300
0.500
0.300
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.230
0.220
0.180
0.072
0.056
0.090
0.040
0.125
0.050
0.030
0.035
0.030
0.035
0.040
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.025
0.02C
0.030
0.040
0.032
0.045
0.005
0.015
0.020
0.010
0.010
0.060
0.045
0.005
00665
PHOS-TOT

MG/L P
0.040
0.040
0.040
0.050
0.050
0.070
0.040
0.040
0.060
0.040
0.040
0.070

0.030

-------
STOKET HETRItVAL DATE T6/08/12
  DATE   TIME DEPTH N02&N03
  FROM    OF
   TO    DAY  FEET
74/11/10
74/12/14
75/01/11
75/03/08
75/04/05
75/05/03
75/05/17
75/06/07
75/06/31
75/07/13
75/08/09
75/09/13
75/10/04
14 50
09 55
11 50

09 15
12 ?0
0? 45
08 45
09 35
10 00
14 45
13 00
09 40
                                                                  4903A2
                                                                 40  29 03.0  111  27 52.0 4
                                                                 PROVO RIVER
                                                                 49       7.5 CHARLESTON
                                                                 T/DEEW CREEK RESERVOIR
                                                                 DRT RD 8WDG i.2 MI N OF CHARLESTON
                                                                 HEP ALES             2111204
                                                                  OOOC FEET   DEPTH  CLASS 00
0630
&N03
OTAL
G/L
0.366
0.480
0.416
0.284
0.195
0.130
0.370
0.185
0.240
0.260
0.970
0.720
0.870
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.200
0.750

1.100
0.250
0.300
0.150
1.000
0.300
0.300
0.700
0.300
0.200
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.020
0.035
0.027
0.040
0.045
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.015
0.015
0.032
0.030
0.040
00671
PHOS-OIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.035
0.025
0.027
0.028
0.030
0.010
0.030
0.015
0.020
0.025
0.065
0.070
0.075
00665
PHOS-TOT

MG/L P
0.040
0.035
0.040
0.060
0.070
0.050
0.020

0.050
0.090
0.080
0.120
0.120

-------
STOHET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/os/i2
                                                                  490381
                                                                 40 27 30.0 111 30 40.0 4
                                                                 49      7.5 ASPEN GROVE
                                                                 T/DEER CREEK KESEKVOIR   150791
                                                                 BNK 100 FT E OF ORT RD 6 M W OF CHRLSTON
                                                                 11EPALES             2111204
                                                                  0000 FEET  DEPTH  CLASS 00
TIME DEPTH
  DATE
  FROM    or
   TO    DAY  FEET

74/11/10 13 40
75/05/03 10 30
75/05/17 1<* 45
75/06/07 10 50
75/06/21 11 10
75/0 7/11 11 30
75/08/09 10 00
75/09/13 14 00
75/10/05 13 15
00630
N02&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.088
0.190
0.060
0.120
0.090
0.130
0.115
0.065
0.060
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.100
0.250
0.150
0.250
0.450
0.400
0.100
0.200
0.100K
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.040
0.026
0.025
0.015
0.017
0.010
0.055
0.010
0.005K
00671
PhOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.005
0.030
0.007
0.030
0.027
0.035
0.020
0.030
0.045
00665
PHOS-TOT

MG/L P
0.020
0.080
0.010
0.090
0.080
0.060
0.020
0.110
0.060
  K  VALUE KNOWN  TO  BE
  LESS  THAN  INDICATED

-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/OS/12
  DATE   TIME DEPTH N02*.N03
  FROM    OF
   TO    DAY  FEET
74/11/10
75/01/11
75/02/08
75/03/08
75/04/Ob
75/05/03
75/05/17
75/06/07
75/06/21
75/07/12
75/08/09
75/09/13
75/10/05
14 ?0
10 10
11 30
09 55

09 10
11 ?0
10 00
09 00
09 50
10 30
09 50
13 15
16 ?5
                                                                 40 29 Ift.O IH 28 00.0 «
                                                                 SNiAKE CREEK
                                                                 49      7,5 CHARLESTON
                                                                 T/DEER CREEK RESERVOIR
                                                                 fcS BKUG 1.4 MI N OF CHARLESTON
                                                                 liEPALES              2111204
                                                                  0000 FEET  DEPTH  CLASS  00
0630
'«.N03
OTAL
IG/L
0.720
0.576
0.528
0.490
0.485
0.540
0.620
1.100
0.760
0.780
1.200
1.050
0.770
0.790
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.300
0.700
0.500
0.6GO
l.?00
0.500
0.600
0.100
0.875
0.350
0.665
0.350
0.600
0.200
00610
NH3-*
TOTAL
MG/L
0.170
0.100
0.100
0.128
0.136
0.135
0.185
0.095
0.130
0.085
0.090
0.065
0.230
0.040
00671
PHOS-OIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.035
0.040
0.05S
0.072
0.068
0.060
0.110
0.100
0.050
0.040
0.045
0.040
0.045
0.040
00665
PHOS-TOT

MG/L P
0.035
0.050
0.090
0.100
0.070
0.130
0.160
0.116
0.120
0.050
0.091
0.050
0.120
0.080

-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/08/12
  DATE   TIME DEPTH
  FROM    OF
   TO    DAY  FEET
74/11/10
74/13/14
75/04/05
75/05/03
75/05/17
75/06/07
75/06/21
75/07/12
75/08/09
75/09/13
75/10/05
12 00
10 30
09 00
11 00
09 30
08 30
09 20
09 45
09 40
12 50
                                                                  490301
                                                                 40 27 40.0 ill 28 15.0 4
                                                                 UANILLS CKtLK
                                                                 49      7.5 CHARLESTON
                                                                 T/DEER CHEEK RESERVOIR
                                                                 HWY 113 BROS .1 MI S OF CHARLESTON
                                                                 11EPALES             2111204
                                                                  6000 FEET  DEPTH  CLASS 00
0630
!&N03
OTAL
IG/L
0.810
0.672
0.590
0.280
0.430
0.230
0.820
1.100
1.050
1.050
0.085
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.400
0.800
0.700
0.800
0.150
1.350
0.900
0.350
0.600
0.400
0.100
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.015
0.185
0.035
0.200
0.065
0.030
0.025
0.060
0.025
0.020
0.005
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.315
0.185
0.070
0.210
0.050
0.030
0.120
0.185
0.175
0.180
0.050
00665
PHOS-TOT

MG/L P
0.340
0.280
0.170
0.320

0.230
0.210
0.213
0.200
0.230
0.060

-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/Orf/12
  DATE   TIME DEPTH N02&N03
  FROM    OF
   TO    DAY  FEET
74/11/10
74/1a/14
75/01/11
75/03/08
75/03/08
75/04/05
75/05/03
75/05/17
75/06/07
75/06/21
75/CT/12
75/08/09
75/09/13
11 10
11 25
12 20
09 15

08 50
13 00
09 10
08 20
09 00
09 30
09 30
12 30
                                                                  4903E1
                                                                 40 24 17.0 111 27 52.0 4
                                                                 MAIN CHANNEL
                                                                 49      7.5 CHARLESTON
                                                                 T/DEER CREEK RESERVOIR
                                                                 P«VT RD BROG 2.2 MI N* OF WALLSBURG
                                                                 11EPALES             2111204
                                                                  0000 FEET  DEPTH  CLASS 00
0630
I&N03
OTAL
1G/L
0.384
0.576
0.576
0.520
0.624
0.610
0.315
0.280
0.145
0.280
0.210
0.095
0.220
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.500
1.000
0.300
0.700
1.250
0.400
0.700
0.500
0.650
0.6CO
0.700
0.600
0.900
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.015
0.045
0.030
0.040
0.080
0.025
0.060
0.050
0.020
0.020
0.050
0.030
0.050
00671
PriOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.030
0.035
0.035
0.040
0.048
0.030
0.035
0.063
0.040
0.035
0.070
0.045
0.060
00665
PHOS-TOT

MG/L P
0.050
0.070
0.070
0.080
0.140
0.100
0.160
0.252
0.140
0.070
0.190
0.060
0.170

-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 76/06/12
                                                                  4903F1
                                                                 40 30 26eO 111 26 26.0 4
                                                                 SrRING CREEK
                                                                 49      7.5 HEBEK CITY
                                                                 T/QEER CREEK RESERVOIR    150791
                                                                 HrfY  113 BROG BELOW  HEBER  CITY  STP
                                                                 HEP ALES              2111204
                                                                  0000 FEET  DEPTH   CLASS  00
DATE
FROM
TO
74/11/10
74/12/10
75/01/11
75/02/08
75/03/08
75/04/05
75/05/03
75/05/17
75/06/07
75/06/21
75/08/09
75/09/13
75/10/05
00630 00625
TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TOTAL N
GAY FEET
12
18
10
10

10
10
10
09
10
10
13
10
15
35
00
15

00
00
14
10
05
20
30
30
MG/L
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.650
.624
.540
.384
.232
.340
.210
.230
.480
.660
.990
.750
.550
MG/L
0.
0.
1.
1.
1.
0.
0.
2.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
500
600
100
000
850
950
850
000
850
050
900
900
200
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PHOS-DIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
o.
0.
065
125
280
256
166
240
195
140
050
060
145
175
020
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
P
330
210
250
208
152
200
210
115
105
115
230
280
190
MG/L P
0.370
0.300
0.400
0.320
0.280
0.335
0.320
0.210
0.220
0.190
0.280
0.460
0.220

-------
STOSET rtETRIEVAL DATE 76/OS/12
  DATE   TIME DEPTH N02&N03
  FROM    OF
   TO    DAY  FEET

75/01/15 14 10
75/05/02 \3 45
75/05/29 10 30
75/06/09 14 55
75/07/02 13 00
75/C8/13 11 30
75/09/09 12 30
75/10/30 10 30
75/12/16 11 05
                                                                  4903AA          N04903AA     POOOOOO
                                                                 40 30 00.0 111 28 00.0 4
                                                                 CLEARVIEW TROUT FARM
                                                                 49      7.5 HEfaER
                                                                 T/DEE* CREEK RES.        150791
                                                                 PROVO RIVER
                                                                 HEP ALES             2141204
                                                                  0000 FEET  DEPTH  CLASS 00
0630
&N03
OTAL
G/L
0.080
0.150
0.150
0.150
0.100
0.100
0.125
0.100
0.125
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
.OOOK
.100
.400
0.500K
.900
.500
.000
2.750
1.300
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.050K
0.050K
0.120
0.050K

0.050K
0.025K
0.025K
0.025K
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L f»
0.050K
0.100K
0.093
0.100
0.074
0.140
0.110
0.025K
0.050
00665
PHOS-TOT

MG/L P
0.205
0.100K
0.100K
0.100
0.400
0.240
0.110
0.170
0.100K
50051
FLOW
RATE
INST MOD
2.780
2.780
3.000
3.070
3.000
3.030
3.020
3.000
3.000
50053
CONDUIT
FLOw-MGO
MONTHLY
2.800
2.800
3.000
2.760
3.000
3.100
3.100
3.100
3.100
   K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
   LESS THAN INDICATED

-------
            DATt.
                                                             4903CA          TF*903CA
                                                            40 29 00.0 111 2B 00.0 4
                                                            MIDWAY
                                                            49      7.5 HEBER
                                                            T/DEER CREEK RES.
                                                            SNAKt CREEK
                                                            11EPALES
                                                             0000 FEET  DEPTH  CLASS 00
                                                                                          P001000

jttL
F^><
TO
75/01/15
75/04/10
75/05/02
75/05/29
75/06/0'-*
75/J7/02
7b/08/U
75/09/09
75/10/31
7S/1?/1*

TIME DEPTH
OF
JAY FEET
13 10
11 30
12 10
09 30
14 15
09 30
12 30
09 15
09 00
10 00
00630
N02&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
2.400
4.200
4.400
S.400
5.250
4.200
4.500
5.700
6.600
2.500
00625
TOT KJEU
N
MG/L
9.000
3.6CO
5.500
6.900
5.600
10.500
10.500
6.600
3.000
5.200
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
O.OSOK
O.C88
0.083
0.120
O.OSOK
0.075
0.450
0.050
0.092
0.035
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
2.500
2.300
3.300
1.750
1.900
1.450
4.300
2.400
3.000
2.000
00665
PHOS-TOT

MG/L P
3.800
2.800
5.000
2.600
3.900
3.100
5.400
3.400
4.000
2.700
50051
FLO*
RATE
INST MGD
0.240
0.162
0.170
0.190
0.260
0.500
0.300
0.300
0.400
0.260
50053
CONDUIT
FLOX-MGO
MONTHLY
0.19*
0.180
0.180
0.250
0.370

0.300
0.300
0.400
0.250
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED

-------
STORET RETRIEVAL OATE 76/08/12
                                                                  4S03CB           N04903Ce)
                                                                 40 29 00.0  111  28 00.0  4
                                                                 MIDWAY FISrI HAT.
                                                                 49      7.5 HEBER
                                                                 T/OEEK CrtEEK rtES.
                                                                 SNAKE CREEK
11EPALES
2141204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00

DATE
FfrOM
TO
75/01/15
75/04/10
75/05/02
75/05/29
75/06/09
75/07/02
75/08/13
75/09/09
75/10/30
75/12/16

TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEcT
13 20
11 35
12 30
09 10
14 00
09 40
12 45
09 30
03 50
10 00
00630
N02&N03
M-TOTAL
MG/L
0.720
0.700
0.700
0.350
0.350
0.575
0.575
0.575
0.650
0.775
006?5
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
l.OOOK
0.500K
0.500K
1.400
0.500K
0.320
0.900
0.885
1.400
1.800
09610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.050K
0.050K
0.060
0.081
0.050K
0.025K
0.055
0.025K
0.025K
0.025K
00671
PHOS-OIS
ORTriO
MG/L P
0.089
0.130
0.095
0.073
0.071
0.040
0.050
0.069
0.063
0.062
00665
PHOS-TOT

MG/L P
0.100K
0.200
0.100
0.180
0.100
0.050K
0.100K
0.100K
0.280
0.100K
50051
FLUW
RATE
INST MGO
11.300
14.700
15.000
20.900
26.800
27.500
2^.300
18.600
18.500
18.500
50053
CONDUIT
FLOw-MGD
MONTHLY
11.000
12.700


17.700

28.000
23.500
22.500
22.500
     K  VALUE KNOWN  TO  HE
     LESS THAN  INDICATED

-------
               L DATE 76/03/12
                                                                  4903FA          Tf^903FA     P0030CO
                                                                 40 30 26eO 111 26 26.0 4
                                                                 HE3EK CITY
                                                                 49      7.5 HEBER CITY
                                                                 T/OEEW CREEK RES.        150791
                                                                 SPRING C^EEK
                                                                 ilEPALES             2141204
                                                                  0000 FEET  DEPTH  CLASS 00
  DATE   TIME DEPTH
  FROM    OF
   TO    DAf  FEET

75/01/15 13 50
75/04/10 1? 00
75/05/02 U 20
75/05/29 10 00
75/06/09 14 35
75/07/02 1? 05
75/08/13 12 00
75/09/09 10 00
75/10/30
75/12/16 10 40
00630
N02&N03
N-TOTAL"
MG/L
0.720
1.150
1.450
2.700
3.000
2.900
3.100
2.750
2.800
1.350
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
18.000
18.500
17.500
6.900
6.000
0.750
4.100
1.600
11.000
12.000
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
3.150
3.700
1.250
0.100
0.140
0.025K
0.095
0.025
0.375
0.100
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORifiO
MG/L P
4.300
4.500
5.300
1.050
0.860
0.790
0.740
0.690
2.200
3.200
00665
PHOS-TOT

MG/L P
6.400
5.600
7.500
1.800
1.850
0.840
1.100
1.200
3.500
4.200
50051
FLOW
RATE
INST MOD
0.800
0.420
0.500
1.500
3.990
5.500
6.500
6.500
0.400
0.800
50053
CONDUIT
FLOd-MGD
MONTHLY
1.100
0.700
0.470
1.800
1.300

6.500
b.500
0.400
0.800
     K VALUE KNOWN TO  BE
     LESS THAN  INDICATED

-------