IS. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
WORKING PAPER SERIES
REPORT
ON
VIVA NAUGHTON RESERVOIR
LINCOLN COUNTY
WYOMING
EPA REGION VIII
WORKING PAPER No, 892
CORVALLIS ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY - CORVALLIS, OREGON
and
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING & SUPPORT LABORATORY - LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
•&G.P.O. 699-440
-------
REPORT
ON
VIVA NAUGHTON ESERVDIR
LINCOLN COUNTY
WYOMING
EPA REGION VIII
WORKING PAPER No, 892
WITH THE COOPERATION OF THE
WYOMING DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
AND THE
WYOMING NATIONAL GUARD
AUGUST, 1977
-------
1
CONTENTS
Page
Foreword ii
List of Wyomtng Lakes and Reservoirs iv
Lake and Drainage Area Map • v
Sections
I. Conclusions 1
II. Lake and Drainage Basin Characteristics 4
III. Lake Water Quality Summary 5
IV. Nutrient Loadings 9
V, Literature Reviewed 13
VI. Appendices . 14
-------
FOREWORD
The National Eutrophication Survey was initiated in 1972 in
response to an Administration commitment to investigate the nation-
wide threat of accelerated eutrophication to freshwater lakes and
reservoirs.
OBJECTIVES
The Survey was designed to develop, in conjunction with state
environmental agencies, information on nutrient sources, concentrations,
and impact on selected freshwater lakes as a basis for formulating
comprehensive and coordinated national, regional, and state management
practices relating to point-source discharge reduction and non-point
source pollution abatement in lake watersheds.
ANALYTIC APPROACH
The mathematical and statistical procedures selected for the
Survey's eutrophication analysis are based on related concepts that:
a. A generalized representation or model relating
sources, concentrations, and impacts can be constructed.
b. By applying measurements of relevant parameters
associated with lake degradation, the generalized model
can be transformed into an operational representation of
a lake, its drainage basin, and related nutrients.
c. With such a transformation, an assessment of the
potential for eutrophication'control can be made.
LAKE ANALYSIS
In this report, the first stage of evaluation of lake and water-
shed data collected from the study lake and its drainage basin is
documented. The report is formatted to provide state environmental
agencies with specific information for basin planning [§303(e)], water
quality criteria/standards review [§303(c)], clean lakes [§314(a,b)],
and water quality monitoring [§106 and §305(b)] activities mandated
by the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972.
-------
iii
Beyond the single lake analysis, broader based correlations
between nutrient concentrations (and loading) and trophic condi-
tion are being made to advance the rationale and data base for
refinement of nutrient water quality criteria for the Nation's
freshwater lakes. Likewise, multivariate evaluations for the
relationships between land use, nutrient export, and trophic
condition, by lake class or use, are being developed to assist
in the formulation of planning guidelines and policies by EPA
and to augment plans implementation by the states.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The staff of the National Eutrophication Survey (Office of
Research & Development, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency)
expresses sincere appreciation to the Wyoming Department of Environ-
.mental Quality for professional involvement, to the Wyoming National
Guard for conducting the tributary sampling phase of the Survey,
and to those Wyoming wastewater treatment plant operators who
voluntarily provided effluent samples.
The staff of the Water Quality Division provided invaluable
lake documentation and counsel during the Survey, reviewed the
preliminary reports, and provided critiques most useful in the
preparation of this Working Paper series.
Brigadier General James L. Spence, The Adjutant General of
Wyomingt and Project Officer Colonel Donald L. Boyer, who directed
the volunteer efforts of the Wyoming National Guardsmen, are also
gratefully acknowledged for their assistance to the Survey.
-------
NAME
Big Sandy
Boulder
Boysen
De Smet
Flaming Gorge
Fremont
Glendo
Keyhole
Ocean
Semi noe
Soda
Viva Naughton
Woodruff Narrows
Yellowtail
iv
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
STUDY RESERVOIRS
State of Wyoming
COUNTY
Sublette, Sweetwater
Sublette
Fremont
Johnson
Sweetwater, WY; Daggett, UT
Sublette
Converse, Platte
Crook
Fremont
Carbon
Sublette
Lincoln
Uinta
Bighorn, WY; Bighorn,
Carbon, MT
-------
VIVA NAUCHJON
RESERVOIR
VIVA NAUGHTON
RESERVOIR
® Tributary Sampling Site
x Lake Sampling Site
Drainage Area Boundary
aKra.
2 T
Scale
« s Mi.
Map Location
110*30'
-------
VIVA NAUGHTON RESERVOIR
STORE! NO. 5612
I. CONCLUSIONS
A. Trophic Condition:
Survey data indicate that Viva Naughton Reservoir is eutro-
phic. It ranked thirteenth in overall trophic quality among
the 14 Wyoming lakes and reservoirs sampled in 1975 when com-
pared using a combination of six water quality parameters*.
Eleven of the water bodies had less median total phosphorus,
all of the others had less median dissolved orthophosphorus and
mean chlorophyll a_, eight had less median inorganic nitrogen,
and six had greater mean Seechi disc transparency. Marked
depression of dissolved oxygen with depth occurred at station 2
in August.
Survey limnologists noted algal blooms in progress each of
the three sampling times, and massive summer blue-green algae
blooms in this reservoir have been reported (Gaufin, 1963).
B. Rate-Limiting Nutrient:
The algal assay results are not considered representative
of conditions in the reservoir at the times the samples were
taken (08/06/75 and 10/16/75) due to significant changes in
the nutrients in the samples during shipment from the field to
the laboratory.
The reservoir data indicate nitrogen limitation at all sam-
pling times.
*See Appendix A.
-------
2
C. Nutrient Controllability:
1. Point sources—No known municipal or industrial waste-
water facilities impacted Viva Naughton Reservoir during the
sampling year. Septic tanks serving shoreline residences
were estimated to have contributed 0.3% of the total phos-
phorus load, but a shoreline survey would have to be conducted
to determine the significance of those sources.
The present phosphorus loading of 0.67 g/m2/year is more
than that proposed by Vollenweider (Vollenweider and Dillon,
1974) as an oligotrophic loading but less than his suggested
eutrophic loading (see page 12). However, there was an ap-
parent loss of phosphorus during the sampling year, (i.e.,
more phosphorus was measured leaving the outlet than entering
via the inlets), and the calculated loading probably is too low.
This may be indicative of unmeasured nutrient input from non-
point source runoff, an underestimation of septic tanks loads,
or the resolubilization of previously sedimented phosphorus
within the reservoir. Whatever the cause, it is likely that
the loading reported above is less than the actual phosphorus load the
reservoir receives.
2. Non-point sources--Non-point sources accounted for 99.7%
of the total phosphorus load during the sampling year. Hams Fork
contributed 87.4%, and Trail Creek contributed 3.7%. The un-
gaged minor tributaries and immediate drainage contributed an
estimated 5.9%
Any improvement in the present trophic condition of the
-------
3
reservoir would likely be dependent on non-point source control.
Much of the surrounding area is pasture and rangeland, and fur-
ther investigation is needed to determine the nutrient contri-
bution and controllability of such sources.
-------
II. RESERVOIR AND DRAINAGE BASIN CHARACTERISTICS1"
A. Morphometry :
1. Surface area: 5.90 kilometers2.
2. Mean depth: 8.9 meters.
3. Maximum depth: 22.9 meters.
4. Volume: 52.510 x 106 m3.
5. Mean hydraulic retention time: 170 days (based on outflow).
B. Tributary and Outlet:
(See Appendix C for flow data)
1. Tributaries -
Drainage Mean flow
Name area (km2)* (m3/sec)*
Hams Fork (A-2) 530.9 3.780
Hams Fork (A-3) 0.0 0.033
Trail Creek 7.5 0.055
Minor tributaries &
immediate drainage - 79.9 0.055
Totals 618.3 3.923
2. Outlet -
Hams Fork 624.2** 3.570
C. Precipitation***:
1. Year of sampling: 24.6 centimeters.
2. Mean annual: 24.7 centimeters.
t Table of metric conversions—Appendix B.
ttNeuchwanderj 1976.
* For limits of accuracy, see Working Paper No. 175, "...Survey Methods,,
1973-1976".
** Includes area of reservoir.
*** See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
5
III. WATER QUALITY SUMMARY
Viva Naughton Reservoir was sampled three times during the open-
water season of 1975 by means of a pontoon-equipped Huey helicopter.
Each time, samples for physical and chemical parameters were collected
from a number of depths at three stations on the reservoir (see map,
page v). During each visit, a single depth-integrated (4.6 m or near
bottom to surface) sample was composited from the stations for phyto-
plankton identification and enumeration; and during the August and
October visits, a single 18.9-liter depth-integrated sample was com-
posited for algal assays. Also each time, a depth-integrated sample
was collected from each of the stations for chlorophyll a_ analysis.
The maximum depths sampled were 5.8 meters at station 1, 15.5 meters
at station 2, and 18.0 meters at station 3.
The sampling results are presented in full in Appendix D and are
summarized in the following table.
-------
A. SUMMARY Of PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS FOR VIVA NAUGHTON RESEHVOIK
STORET CODE 5612
1ST SAMPLING ( 8/
3 SITES
6/75)
2ND SAMPLING ( 9/18/75)
3 SITES
3RD SAMPLING (10/16/75)
3 SITES
PARAMETER
TEMP (C>
DISS OXY (MG/L)
CNOCTVY (MCROMO)
PH (STAND UNITS)
TOT ALK (MG/L)
TOT P (MG/L)
ORTHO P (MG/L)
N02»N03 (MG/L)
AMMONIA (MG/L)
KJEL N (MG/L)
INORG N (MG/L)
TOTAL N (MG/L)
CHLRPYL A (UG/L)
SECCHI (METERS)
RANGE
13.0
1.8
233.
8.2
141.
0.022
0.005
0.020
0.020
0.200
0.040
0.220
14.0
1.8
- 19.0
9.0
- 251.
9.3
- 152.
- 0.247
- 0.113
- 0.030
- 0.210
- 0.500
- 0.240
- 0.520
- 21.4
2.1
MEAN
17.6
7.8
245.
9.0
147.
0.059
0.02b
0.021
0.050
0.329
0.071
0.350
18.6
1.9
MEDIAN
18.5
8.3
245.
9.1
148.
0.033
0.013
0.020
0.030
0.300
0.050
0.320
20.5
1.8
RANGE
10.4
6.2
205.
8.0
138.
0.081
0.027
0.020
0.060
0.400
0.080
0.420
6.0
0.5
- 11.3
8.0
- 244.
8.8
- 150.
- 0.175
- 0.044
- 0.020
- 0.140
- 0.800
- 0.160
- 0.820
- 87.8
1.5
MEAN
11.0
7.1
236.
8.6
146.
0.107
0.033
0.020
0.100
0.558
0.120
0.578
34.0
1.2
MEDIAN
11.0
7.3
241.
8.7
147.
0.095
0.029
0.020
0.090
0.600
0.110
0.620
8.2
1.5
RANGE
8.9
7.4
207.
8.3
137.
0.047
0.023
0.040
0.030
0.400
0.120
0.440
4.9
1.5
9.4
8.0
- 224.
8.4
- 146.
- 0.100
- 0.027
- 0.050
- 0.100
- 0.700
- 0.140
- 0.740
- 39.0
2.7
MEAN
9.2
7.8
211.
8.4
140.
0.061
0.024
0.041
0.094
0.458
0.135
0.499
22.6
2.2
MEDIAN
9.2
7.8
210.
8.4
140.
0.056
0.024
0.040
0.095
0.400
0.140
0.440
23.8
2.4
-------
B. Biological Characteristics:
1. Phytoplankton -
Sampling
Date
08/06/75
09/18/75
10/16/75
2. Chlorophyll a_ -
Sampling
Date
08/05-06/75
09/18/75
10/16/75
Domi nant
Genera
1 . Aphan i zomenon sp .
2. Chroomonas (?) sp.
3. Microcystis sp.
Other genera
Total
1. Aphani zomenon sp.
2. Schroederia sp.
Total
1. Aphani zomenon sp_.
2. Cryptomonas sp.
3. Chroomonas (7) sp.
4. Stephanodiscus sp.
Total
Station
Number
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
Algal Units
per ml
4,430
292
243
390
5,355
4,073
41
4,114
2,135
137
172
34
2,478
Chlorophyll a
(ug/i )
14.0
21.4
20.5
8.2
6.0
87.8
4.9
23.8
39.0
Limiting Nutrient Study:
Due to significant changes in the nutrients in the samples
during shipment from the field to the laboratory, the assay
-------
8
results are not considered representative of conditions in the
reservoir at the times the samples were taken (08/05-06/75 and
10/16/75).
The reservoir data indicate nitrogen limitation at all samp-
ling stations and times; i.e., the mean inorganic nitrogen/ortho-
phosphorus ratios were 8/1 or less, and nitrogen limitation would
be expected.
-------
IV. NUTRIENT LOADINGS
(See Appendix E for data)
For the determination of nutrient loadings, the Wyoming National
Guard collected monthly near-surface grab samples from each of the
tributary sites indicated on the map (page v). Sampling was begun
in October, 1974, and was completed in September, 1975.
Through an interagency agreement, stream flow estimates for the
year of sampling and a "normalized" or average year were provided by
the Wyoming District Office of the U.S. Geological Survey for the
tributary sites nearest the reservoir.
In this report, nutrient loads for sampled tributaries were cal-
culated using mean annual concentrations and mean annual flows. Nu-
trient loads for unsampled "minor tributaries and immediate drainage"
("ZZ" of U.S.G.S.) were estimated using the mean concentrations in
Trail Creek at station B-l and the mean annual ZZ flow (nutrient loads
for Hams Fork at station A-3 are included in the minor tributary loads)
No known municipal or industrial point sources impacted the reser-
voir during the sampling year.
-------
10
A. Waste Sources:
1. Known municipal - None
2. Known industrial - None
B. Annual Total Phosphorus Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
kg P/ % of
Source yr total
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
Hams Fork 3,455 87.4
Trail Creek 145 3.7
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non-point load) - 235 5.9
c. Known municipal STP's - None
d. Septic tanks* - 10 0.3
e. Known industrial - None
f. Direct precipitation** - 105 2.7
Total 3,950 100.0
2. Outputs -
Reservoir outlet - Hams Fork 5,290
3. Net annual P loss - 1340 kg.
* Estimate based on 30 lakeshore dwellings; see Working Paper No. 175.
** See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
11
C. Annual Total Nitrogen Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
kg N/ % of
Source yr total
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
Hams Fork 111,575 88.6
Trail Creek 2,945 2.3
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non-point load) - 4,715 3.7
c. Known municpal STP's - None
d. Septic tanks* - 320 0.3
e. Known industrial - None
f. Direct precipitation** - 6.730 5.1
Total 125,925 100.1
2. Outputs -
Reservoir outlet - Hams Fork -19,115
3. Net annual N accumulation - 6,810 kg.
D. Non-point Nutrient Export by Subdrainage Area:
Tributary kg P/km2/yr kg N/km2/yr
Hams Fork 7 210
Trail Creek 19 393
* Estimate based on 30 lakeshore dwellings; see Working Paper No. 175.
** See Working Paper No. 175.
-------
12
E. Yearly Loads:
In the following table, the existing phosphorus loadings
are compared to those proposed by Vollenweider (Vollenweider
and Dillon, 1974). Essentially, his "dangerous" loading is
one at which the receiving water would become eutrophic or
remain eutrophic; his "permissible" loading is that which
would result in the receiving water remaining oligotrophic
or becoming oligotrophic if morphometry permitted. A meso-
trophic loading would be considered one between "dangerous"
and "permissible".
Note that Vollenweider's model may not be applicable to
water bodies with short hydraulic retention times.
Total Phosphorus Total Nitrogen
Total Accumulated Total Accumulated
grams/m2/yr 0.67 loss* 21.3 1.2
Vollenweider phosphorus loadings
(g/m2/yr) based on mean depth and mean
hydraulic retention time of Viva Naughton Reservoir:
"Dangerous" (eutrophic loading) 0.84
"Permissible" (pligotrophic loading) 0.42
* There was an apparent loss of phosphorus during the sampling year.
This may have been due to solubilization of previously sedimented
phosphorus, recharge with phosphorus-rich ground water, unknown and
unsampled point sources, or underestimation of septic tank loads.
-------
13
V. LITERATURE REVIEWED
Gaufin, Arden R., 1963. Limnological survey of Lake Viva Naughton
and Kemmerer Reservoir, Wyoming. Prelim. Rept. to Utah Power
and Light Co., U. of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Neuchwander, Ken, 1976. Personal communication (reservoir morpho-
metry). Utah Power and Light Co., Salt Lake City.
Vollenweider, R. A., and P. J. Dillon, 1974. The application of
the phosphorus loading concept to eutrophication research.
Natl. Res. Council of Canada Publ. No. 13690, Canada Centre
for Inland Waters, Burlington, Ontario.
-------
14
VI. APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
LAKE RANKINGS
-------
CAKE OAT* TO HE USEi) IN RANKINGS
CODE
5601
5602
5603
5604
5605
5606
560 T
5608
5609
5610
5611
5612
56J3
561*
L»KE NAME
BIG SAMDr RESERVOIR
RUULOEP LAKE
HOVSEN RESERVOIR
LAKE OE SMET
FLAMING GORGE RESERVOIR
FREMONT LAKE
GL.ENDO RESERVOIR
KEY HOLE RESERVOIR
OCEAN LAKE
SEMINOLE RESERVOIR
SOOA LAKE
VIVA NAUGHTON RESERVOIR
WOODRUFF NARROaS RESERVO
rELLOHTAIL RESERVOIR
MEDIAN
TOTAL P
0.087
0.00*
0.037
0.033
0.01*
0.006
0.045
0.028
0.043
0.030
0.063
0.065
0.069
0.026
McOIAN
I-VO-ilj N
0 .060
0.040
0.140
0.040
0.605
0.040
0.315
0.050
0.040
0.130
0.040
0.120
0.105
0.310
500-
MEAN SEC
487.667
361.600
465.923
409.000
366.461
-22,000
459.182
454.583
478.333
447.000
387.500
430.000
470.000
364.500
MEAN
CHLORA
4.393
2.483
6.26<«
11.167
S.611
3.783
8.473
7.792
7.500
2.536
5.575
25.067
12.950
5.410
15-
MIN OJ
a.BOO
8.400
14.400
9.400
12.200
7.400
12.600
14.000
8.600
11.000
15.000
13.200
13.200
10.000
MEUI
OISS 0*T
0.020
0.002
0.01<»
0.006
0.003
0.002
0.014
0.004
0.004
0.007
0.014
0.024
0.019
0.017
-------
PERCENT or LAKES «IIT-I HIGHER. VALUES 'NUMBER UF
LA
MEOI AN
TOTAL P
0 (
92 <
46 (
54 (
35 (
100 (
31 <
69 (
38 (
62 (
?3 (
15 <
8 <
77 (
0)
12)
6)
7)
11)
13)
4)
9)
5)
8)
3)
2)
1)
1C)
KrIS a!TM HIGHF.W v ALOIS)
MEDIAN
54 (
92 <
23 (
73 (
0 (
73 (
8 (
62 <
92 (
31 (
92 (
39 (
46 (
15 (
7)
11)
3)
9)
0)
9)
1)
8)
11)
4)
11)
5)
6)
2)
500-
MEAN SEC
0 (
92 <
?3 <
62 <
77 (
100 (
31 (
38 (
8 (
46 (
69 (
54 (
15 (
85 (
0)
12)
3)
6)
10)
13)
4)
5)
1)
6)
9)
7)
2)
11)
MEAN
CHLOHA
77 (
100 (
46 (
15 I
54 (
8b (
23 <
31 (
38 (
92 (
62 <
0 (
8 (
69 (
10)
13)
b)
2)
7)
11)
3)
4)
5)
12)
8)
0)
1)
9)
15-
MIM DO
77 (
92 (
8 (
69 (
46 <
100 (
38 (
15 (
85 (
54 (
0 (
27 (
27 (
62 (
10)
12)
1)
9)
6)
13)
5)
2)
11)
7)
0)
3)
3)
8)
MEDIAN
DISS 0*ThO P
d (
92 (
42 (
62 (
85 (
100 (
42 (
69 (
77 (
54 (
31 (
0 (
15 (
23 (
1)
12)
5)
6)
11)
13)
5)
9)
10)
7)
4)
0)
2)
3)
INOEX
NO
216
560
163
335
347
558
173
284
338
339
277
134
119
331
-------
LAKES RANKED 8V INDEX NOS.
RANK LAKE CODE LAKE NAME INDEX NO
1 5602 60ULDE* LAKt 560
2 5606 FREMONT LA*E 558
3 5605 FLAMING GORGE RESERVOIR 347
4 5610 SEMINOLE RESERVOIR 339
5 5609 OCEAN LAKE 338
6 5604 LAKE OE SMET 335
7 5614 YELLOWTAIL RESERVOIR 331
8 5608 KEY HOLE RESERVOIR ?84
9 5611 SODA LAKE 277
10 5601 8IG SANDY RESERVOIR 216
11 5603 BOYSEN RESERVOIR 188
12 5607 GLENOO RESERVOIR 173
13 5612 VIVA NAUGHTON RESERVOIR 134
14 5613 WOODRUFF NARROWS RESERVO 119
-------
APPENDIX B
CONVERSION FACTORS
-------
CONVERSION FACTORS
Hectares x 2.471 = acres
Kilometers x 0.6214 = miles
Meters x 3.281 = feet
Cubic meters x 8.107 x 10 = acre/feet
Square kilometers x 0.3861 = square miles
Cubic meters/sec x 35.315 = cubic feet/sec
Centimeters x 0.3937 = inches
*
Kilograms x 2.205 = pounds
Kilograms/square kilometer x 5.711 = Ibs/square mile
-------
APPENDIX C
TRIBUTARY FLOW DATA
-------
LA
-------
.Hi
DO I Mr* i
LAKE CODE 5612
LANE VIVA NAUGHTON
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS(CMS)
TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAR MEAN FLOW DAY
5612A3
5612B1
56UZZ
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
q
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
74
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
74
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
74
74
74
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
75
FLOW DAY
FLOW DAY
FLOW
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.028
0.057
0.142
0.057
0.057
0.057
0.0
0.028
0.028
0.028
0.028
0.028
0.028
0.085
0.170
0.057
0.057
0.057
0.028
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.028
0.142
0.283
0.143
0.057
0.0
0.0
6
22
8
14
29
0.028
0.028
0.028
0.057
0.028
-------
APPENDIX D
PHYSICAL and CHEMICAL DATA
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 76/08/05
561201
42 00 15.0 110 39 48.0 3
VIVA NAUGrlTON RESEHVOIR
56023 WYOMING
11EPALES
2111202
0023 FEET DEPTH CLASS
DATE
FROM
TO
75/08/06
75/09/18
75/10/16
DATE
FROM
TO
75/08/06
75/09/18
75/10/16
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
14 15 0000
14 15 0005
14 15 0019
12 40 0000
12 40 0005
12 40 0015
13 00 0000
13 00 0005
13 00 0012
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
14 15 0000
14 15 0005
14 15 0019
12 40 0000
12 40 0005
12 40 0015
13 00 0000
13 00 0005
13 00 0012
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
19.0
18.9
18.6
10.7
10.6
10.4
8.9
8.9
8.9
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.022
0.041
0.026
0.085
0.090
0.081
0.049
0.048
0.050
00300
DO
MG/L
8.8
9.0
8.6
6.4
6.2
6.4
7.4
7.6
7.4
32217
CHLRPHYL
A
UG/L
14.0
8.2
4.9
00077
TRANSP
SECCHI
INCHES
72
60
60
00031
INCOT LT
REMNING
PERCENT
00094
CNDUCTVY
FIELD
MICROMHO
245
245
251
244
244
205
224
208
207
00400
PH
SU
9.20
9.20
9.10
8.50
8.00
8.60
8.35
8.30
8.30
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
151
151
152
150
150
150
138
137
137
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.020
0.020K
0.040
0.130
0.130
0.140
0.080
0.100
0.100
00
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.300
0.300
0.400
0.400
0.600
0.500
0.400
0.400
0.400
00630
N02&.N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.020K
0.020K
0.020K
0.020K
0.020
0.020K
0.040
0.040
0.04U
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.012
0.005
0.014
0.044
0.044
0.042
0.023
0.024
0.024
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/08/05
561202
41 S3 12.0 110 40 00.0 3
VIV4 NAUGHTON RESERVOIR
560?3 WYOMING
DATE
FROM
TO
75/08/06
75/09/18
75/10/16
TIME
OF
DAY
14 35
14 35
14 35
14 35
14 35
13 05
13 05
13 05
13 05
12 45
12 45
12 45
12 45
DEPTH
FEET
0000
0005
0015
0030
0050
0000
0005
0019
0051
0000
0005
0015
0043
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
19.0
19.0
18.9
18.1
13.3
11.0
11.3
11.2
10.8
9.4
9.4
9.2
9.0
11EPALES
211
005<* FEET DEPTH CLASS
00300
DO
MG/L
8.2
8.6
8.6
7.6
1.8
7.6
7.2
7.6
7.4
8.0
7.8
8.0
8.0
00077
TRANSP
SECCHI
INCHES
84
60
96
00094
CNDUCTVY
FIELD
MICROMHO
251
249
249
247
235
240
241
239
211
210
210
211
208
00400
PH
SU
9.10
9.15
9.10
8.95
8.20
8.70
8.70
8.70
8.75
8.35
8.40
8.35
8.40
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
150
152
141
145
150
150
1J8
141
142
140
141
140
138
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.040
0.020
0.040
0.030
0.210
0.070
0.080
0.090
0.060
0.100
0.100
0.100
0.100
1202
00
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.500
0.300
0.400
0.300
0.400
0.600
0.800
0.400
0.600
0.500
0.500
0.400
0.400
00630 00671
N02&N03 PHOS-UIS
N-TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L MG/L P
0.020K
0.020K
0.020
0.020K
0.030
0.020K
0.020
0.020K
0.020K
0.040
0.040
0.040
0.040
0.013
0.013
0.016
0.014
0.113
0.029
0.032
0.032
0.027
0.024
0.025
0.024
0.023
00665 32217
DATE TIME DEPTH PHOS-TOT CHLRPHYL
FROM OF A
TO DAY FEET MG/L P UG/L
75/08/06 14 35 0000 0.247 21.4
14 35 0005 0.045
14 35 0015 0.029
14 35 0030 0.026
14 35 0050 0.144
75/09/18 13 05 0000 0.086 6.0
13 05 0005 0.098
13 05 0019 0.095
13 05 0051 0.087
75/10/16 12 45 0000 0.067 23.8
1? 45 0005 0.064
12 45 0015 0.066
12 45 0043 0.047
00031
INCDT LT
REMNING
PERCENT
K VALUE KNOWN TO b£
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 76/oa/os
561303
41 55 10.0 110 39 35.0 3
VIVA NAUGHTON RESERVOIR
56033 WYOMING
DATE
FROM
TO
75/08/05
75/09/18
75/10/16
00010
TIME DEPTH WATER
OF TEMP
DAY FEET
15
15
15
15
15
15
13
13
13
13
13
12
12
12
12
12
00
00
00
00
00
00
25
25
25
25
25
20
20
20
20
20
0000
0005
0015
0025
0040
0059
0000
0005
0015
0030
0059
0000
0005
0015
0035
0056
CENT
18
18
la
18
15
13
11
11
11
11
10
9
9
9
9
9
.5
.5
.4
.3
.0
.0
.3
.3
.2
.1
.9
.4
.3
.3
.2
.2
11EPALES
00300
00
MG/L
8.6
8.2
e.4
8.2
5.8
8.2
8.0
7.4
7.4
7.2
6.8
8.0
7.8
8.0
7.6
7.6
00077
TRANSP
SECCHI
INCHES
72
18
108
00094
CNOUCTVY
FIELD
MICROMHO
245
243
243
249
243
233
240
242
242
241
242
210
220
210
208
210
0063
00400
PH
SU
9.15
9.20
9.10
8.30
9.25
8.80
8.80
8.75
8.70
8.80
8.40
8.40
8.40
8.40
8.40
2111202
FEET DEPTH CLASS
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
143
145
144
144
151
145
146
145
148
146
147
146
141
142
138
141
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.030
0.030
0.040
0.030
0.120
0.030
0.090
0.090
0.090
0.090
0.090
00
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.200
0.200
0.400
0.800
0.600
0.400
0.400
0.600
0.700
0.600
0.400
0.400
0.400
00630 00671
N02&.N03 PHOS-DIS
N-TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L MG/L P
0.020K
0.020K
0.020K
0.020K
0.030
0.020K
0.020K
0.020K
0.020K
0.020K
0.020K
0.040
0.040
0.040
O.OSO
0.040
0.017
0.013
0.013
0.020
0.074
0.013
0.030
0.028
0.027
0.028
0.028
0.027
0.026
0.024
0.023
0.025
DATE
FROM
TO
75/08/05
75/09/18
75/10/16
00665 32217 00031
TIME DEPTH PHOS-TOT CHLRPHYL INCDT LT
OF A REMNING
DAY FEET
15
15
15
15
15
15
13
13
13
13
13
12
12
12
12
12
00
00
00
00
00
00
25
25
25
25
?5
20
?0
20
?0
20
0000
0005
0015
0025
0040
0059
0000
0005
0015
0030
0059
0000
0005
0015
0035
0056
MG/L P
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.
0,
0,
0.
.034
.033
.027
,029
.081
.047
.175
.145
.104
.096
.137
.081
.100
.060
.031
.053
UG/L PERCENT
20.5
87.8
39.0
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
-------
APPENDIX E
TRIBUTARY AND WASTEWATER
TREATMENT PLANT DATA
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 76/08/05
DATE TIME DEPTH N026.N03
FROM OF
TO DAY FEET
74/10/06
74/11/22
74/13/08
75/03/03
75/04/30
75/07/14
75/09/29
11
12
10
10
17
17
SO
05
2?
15
30
00
5612A1
41 57 51.0 110 39 35.0 4
HAMS FORK
56 15 KEMMERE*
0/LAKE VIVA NAuGHTON 110692.
6ELO* VIVA NAUGHTON DAM
11EPALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
0630
6.N03
OTAL
G/L
0.008
0.008
0.024
0.125
0.170
0.020
1.1 bo
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
1.000
1.300
0.500
0.400
1.150
1.250
0.300
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.025
0.045
0.045
0.065
0.265
0.065
0.005K
00671
PHOS-OIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.015
0.005
0.010
0.030
0.025
0.035
0.085
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.042
0.030
0.020
0.050
0.040
0.040
0.110
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL OATE 76/OH/J5
DATE TIME DEPTH N02&N03
FROM OF
TO DAY FEET
74/10/06 12 18
74/11/22 12 30
74/12/08 10 00
75/03/03 10 00
75/04/30 09 30
75/09/29 17 00
5612A2
42 00 50.0 110 40 05.0 4
HAMS FORK
56 7.5 WILKINSON CK
T/LAKE VIVA NAUGHTON 110691
DIRT RD 8ROG 15 MI N* OF KEMMERER
11EPALES 2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
0630
'&N03
OTAL
IG/L
0.008
0.008
0.008
0.125
0.170
1.150
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.500
1.100
0.300
1.050
1.000
0.200
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.010
0.020
0.010
0.300
0.180
0.005K
00671
PhOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.005
0.010
0.010
0.035
0.020
0.005K
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P.
0.015
0.010
0.010
0.040
0.040
0.060
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 76/Ob/OS
DATE TIME DEPTH N02&N03
FROM OF
TO DAY FEET
74/10/06 10 00
74/11/22 11 00
74/12/08 10 15
75/07/14 17 00
75/09/29 17 34
5612dl
41 S7 55.0 110 39 15
TRAIL CREEK
56 15 KEMMERER
T/LAKE VIVA NAUGHTON
DIRT ROAD .1 MI E
11EPALES
.0 4
110692
OF VIVA NAUGHTON 0AM
2111204
0000 FEET DEPTH CLASS 00
0630
I«,N03
OTAL
IG/L
0.016
0.008
0.056
0.015
3.300
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
1.400
0.900
0.600
1.400
0.800
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MO/L
0.020
0.025
0.010
0.165
0.010
00671
PHOS-OIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.0^*5
0.035
0.030
0.075
0.035
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.075
0.050
0.060
0.110
0.130
------- |