SWRHL-59r
FINAL REPORT OF OFF-SITE SURVEILLANCE
FOR THE
PIN STRIPE EVENT, APRIL 25, 1966
by
Environmental Surveillance
Western Environmental Research Laboratory
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Published February 1972
This surveillance performed under a Memorandum of
Understanding (No. SF 54 373)
for the
U.S. ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION
-------
This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored
by the United States Government. Neither the United States
nor the United States Atomic Energy Commission, nor any of
their employees, nor any of their contractors, subcon-
tractors, or their employees, makes any warranty, express
or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility
for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any infor-
mation, apparatus, product or process disclosed, or repre-
sents that its use would not infringe privately-owned rights.
Available from the National Technical Information Service,
U. S. Department of Commerce,
Springfield, Va. 22151
ft* * Price: Paper copy $3.00; microfiche $.95.
-------
SWRHL-59r
FINAL REPORT OF OFF-SITE SURVEILLANCE
FOR THE
PIN STRIPE EVENT, APRIL 25, 1966
by
Environmental Surveillance
Western Environmental Research Laboratory*
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Published February 1972
*Note: At the time this work was performed the Laboratory was named the
Southwestern Radiological Health Laboratory, and-was part of the U. S.
Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service,
Environmental Control Administration, Bureau of Radiological Health.
This surveillance performed under a Memorandum of
Understanding (No. SF 54 373)
for the
U.S. ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION
-------
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Grateful appreciation is extended to the State Health Departments
of California, Colorado, Idaho, and Utah for their assistance and
cooperation, which was essential to the completion of the
Surveillance Project. '
Special appreciation is extended to the many off-site residents for
their invaluable contribution of time in providing milk, water, and
vegetation samples, and to those who agreed to participate in the
in vivo thyroid analysis.
la
-------
ABSTRACT
The Public Health Service provided off-site surveillance in support
of the Pin Stripe Event conducted on April 25, 1966, at the Nevada
Test Site. This support consisted of tracking the effluent, monitor-
ing radiation dosage to the off-site population, collecting and
analyzing environmental samples of air, milk, water and vegetation,
and conducting an intensive public relations program for the
off-site residents.
The maximum net gamma exposure rate measured by a portable
survey instrument was 8 mR/hr. This reading was taken along
a gravel road used only occasionally and well away from any con-
tinuously occupied area. The highest net gamma exposure rate
measured at a continuously occupied location was 1. 5 mR/hr. The
above exposure rates were taken during cloud passage.
The maximum gross beta concentration found on an air filter from
a continuously populated area was 25, 000 pCi/m . This filter
131 3
showed a I concentration of 5300 pCi/m . The highest concen-
tration of I in a domestic water supply was 3860 pCi/1 and the
highest concentration of I in a single milk sample was 4800 pCi/1.
This concentration (4800 pCi/1) appeared three days after the event
and was not representative of the levels of I actually consumed
by any off-site resident. Dilution of milk from this dairy with milk
from dairies outside of the contaminated area, lowered the level
of I to a maximum of 100 pCi/1.
-------
Off-site residents in the affected area, who volunteered, were
counted for thyroid burdens in a mobile thyroid counting trailer.
The highest total integrated dose was less than 300 mrad.
All levels of environmental radiation contamination were below
presently accepted safety criteria as established by the U. S.
Atomic Energy Commission Standards for Radiation Protection,
chapter 0524, dated 8/12/63.
11
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ia
ABSTRACT i
TABLE OF CONTENTS iii
LIST OF TABLES v
LIST OF FIGURES vi
INTRODUCTION 1
I. OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES 2
A. External Exposure Measurements 2
1. Ground Monitoring 2
2. Aerial Cloud Tracking 2
3. Exposure Rate Recorders 3
4. Film Badges and Dosimetry 3
B. Environmental Sampling 5
1. Air Samples 5
2. Milk Samples 8
3. Water Samples 9
4. Vegetation Samples 9
5. In Vivo Thyroid Investigation 10
II. ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
A. Air Samples 11
B. Milk and Water Samples 12
C. Vegetation Samples 12
D. Sensitivity 12
III. RESULTS 14
A. Exposure Rate Measurements 14
1. Aerial Monitoring 14
2. Ground Monitoring 15
3. Exposure Rate Recorders 16
4. Film Badges 16
111
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont'd)
III. RESULTS(continued)
B. Environmental Sampling 17
1. Air Sampling 17
2. Water Sampling 19
3. Vegetation Samples 22
4. Milk Samples 22
5. Feed Substitution Study 24
6. Thyroid Analysis 31
IV. CONCLUSIONS 33
A. External Exposures 33
B. Internal Exposures 33
C. Health Implications 34
APPENDICES
DISTRIBUTION
IV
-------
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1. Threshold detectability at time of count of several
radionuclides in various samples, pCi. 13
Table 2. Upper air data from Yucca Lake on April 25, 1966. 14
Table 3. Selected ground monitoring results in off-site
populated areas April 25, 1966, at 3 feet above
ground level. 16
Table 4. Estimated infinite gamma exposure at two popu-
lated locations. 16
Table 5. Exposure rates occurring off the test range complex
on April 25, 1966, as measured by RM-11 recorders. 16
Table 6. Domestic water supply samples containing IpCi/1. 19
131
Table 7. Air sampling stations with concentrations of I in
excess of 50 pCi/m^ on prefilters. 20
131
Table 8. Milk samples containing maximum levels of I
from each location that showed fresh fission
products. 27
Table 9. Number of people within a given range of computed
thyroid dose. 32
-------
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1. RM-11 Exposure rate recorder stations. 4
Figure 2. Portable air samplers operating in Nevada during the
Pin Stripe Event. 6
Figure 3. Air sampling stations operating during the Pin Stripe
Event. 7
Figure 4. Air sampling stations showing detectable amounts of
radioiodines. 18
Figure 5. Areas where one or more water samples was
collected. 21
Figure 6. Vegetation sampling along roads. 23
Figure 7. Milk sampling locations in Nevada. 25
Figure 8. Milk sampling locations other than in Nevada. 26
Figure 9. I concentration in milk from two cows on pasture
in Alamo, Nevada. 29
Figure 10. Comparison of I concentration in milk from the
same dairy after substitution of dry hay for green chop. 30
VI
-------
INTRODUCTION
The Pin Stripe Event was an underground nuclear experiment con-
ducted as part of the Department of Defense Weapons Testing
Program. Pin Stripe was detonated at 1138 PDT, (1838 GMT) on
April 25, 1966, in Area 11, at the Atomic Energy Commission's
Nevada Test Site.
Radioactive effluent was accidently released. A cloud rose to about
5500 feet within 9 minutes after H-hour, and by H + one
hour, the cloud had risen to about 10, 500 feet mean sea level.
Southwesterly winds carried the released material northeasterly
into the off-site area. Seepage of gaseous fission products con-
tinued for several days following this event. Wind direction shifted
approximately 180 by April 27 and small amounts (less than
10 pCi/m ) of fresh fission products were found on prefilters as far
south as Indio, California. By May 4 all air sampling media were
at background levels.
The subject of this report is the off-site surveillance provided by
the Public Health Service (PHS) for the U. S. Atomic Energy
Commission (AEC) in support of the Pin Stripe Event. Under a
Memorandum of Understanding with the AEC, the PHS conducts a
program of radiological monitoring and environmental sampling in
the off-site area surrounding the Nevada Test Site and the Nellis
Air Force Range. The overall complex of the Nevada Test Site
and the Nellis Air Force Range includes the Nuclear Rocket Devel-
opment Station and the Tonopah Test Range and for simplicity will
be called the test range complex throughout this report.
-------
I. OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES
A. External Exposure Measurements
1. Ground Monitoring
Ground monitors tracked the effluent cloud with portable radiation
detection instruments. Each monitor was equipped with the fol-
lowing instruments: Eberline E-500B, Precision Model 111
Standard "Scintillator", and Victoreen Radector Model No.
AGB-50-B-SR.
The Eberline E-500B has a range of 0 to 200 milliroentgens per
hour (mR/hr) beta and/or gamma over four scales with an external
halogen filled G. M. tube detector and a 0 to 2000 mR/hr gamma
only range from an internal Anton 302 tube detector.
The Precision Model 111 Standard "Scintillator" is used primarily
for low level gamma detection and provides for a range of 0 to
5 mR/hr over six linear scales.
The Radector has a range of 0. 05 to 50, 000 mR/hr over two loga-
rithmic scales. This instrument uses an inert gas ionization
chamber as the detector.
The above instruments are accurate to within +^20 percent as
137
calibrated with Cs and can be read to two significant figures.
2. Aerial Cloud Tracking
A U. S. Air Force U-3A aircraft, manned by two PHS monitors
equipped with portable instruments identical to those of the ground
monitors, tracked the effluent cloud to assist in positioning
-------
ground monitors. In addition to the instruments already described,
the aerial monitors used a Victoreen Radector, Model II, (0. 1 to
1, 000, 000 mR/hr range) and were also evaluating a Baird Atomic
Gamma Scintillation Rate Meter Type NE-148A with a 0 - 3 mR/hr
range in three linear scales. Two PHS C-45 aircraft containing
various sampling and measurement equipment were also used as
aids in cloud tracking. However, their primary purpose was
cloud sampling and measurements to determine cloud size and con-
tent. The results of this surveillance are the subject of a separate
report.
3. Exposure Rate Recorders
Eberline Model RM-11 exposure rate recorders were located at
23 stations around the test range complex. (See Figure 1). These
recorders use a Geiger tube detector with a range of 0. 01 to
100 mR/hr. Exposure rate is recorded on a 4-cycle log scale strip
chart with a capacity of 30 hours continuous recording. These re-
corders are accurate to within +20 percent calibrated with a Cs
source.
4. Film Badges and Dosimetry
The PHS routinely maintains 65 film badge stations containing 5 film
badges each off the test range complex and assigns one film badge
to each of approximately 120 off-site residents. The badge uses
Du Pont type 555 film. This film is accurate to + 50 percent in the
30 to 100 mR range and Hh 10 percent in the 100 to 2000 mR range.
The lower limit of detection is 30 mR.
The PHS also maintains 21 stations which are equipped with three
Edgerton, Germeshausen and Grier Model TL-12 thermolumin-
escent dosimeters (TLD). The detection range of this device is
5 mR to 5000 R with reading accuracy at ;+10 percent and with a
standard deviation at the 98 percent confidence level of 2.83%.
-------
A Operating station
• Operating but no chart received
Malfunctioned
Figure 1. RM-11 Exposure rate recorder stations.
4
-------
B. Environmental Sampling
1. Air Samples
On the day of the test, the AEC-PHS Air Surveillance Network (ASN)
consisted of 104 Gelman "Tempest" air samplers. These samplers operate
continuously at off-site locations with one or more samplers located in
each state west of the Mississippi River except Montana and North
Dakota. The network was supplemented by six standby stations
located in the states of Colorado, Idaho, Utah and Wyoming. Standby
stations are operated only when the station operator is notified by the
Southwestern Radiological Health Laboratory(SWRHL) to begin sampling.
There were also five portable air samplers placed downwind.
The "Tempest" air sampler used by the SWRHL uses a Cast Model
1550 vacuum pump driven by an electric motor. The pump has a
flow rate of approximately lOcfm.
The sampler is designed to use a 4-inch diameter filter paper
(prefilter) and a Mine Safety Appliance Co. (MSA) charcoal cartridge.
The ASN uses Whatman 541 filter paper for routine air sampling.
The total volume of air sampled is calculated from an average vacu-
um reading (which in turn indicates the average flow rate) and the
total time of sampling.
Air sampling stations operating during Pin Stripe surveillance
activities are shown in Figures 2 and 3. In addition to the "Tempest"
samplers, each mobile monitoring team was equipped with portable
gasoline generator powered air samplers using the same filters as
the "Tempest". The air mover in this system is a Cast Model 7040
positive displacement pressure-vacuum pump coupled to a Rock-
well Model 415 gas meter for measurement of air flow. The flow rate
of this system averages 6 cfm.
-------
Portable air sampler / charcoal cartridge
Figure 2. Portable air samplers operating in Nevada-during the
Pin Stripe Event.
-------
\
AS J ST.UOO.
v
L, ! I I V-~MESQUIT1
..T^OPWE^S^ \ ./
AIR SURVEILLANCE NETWORK STATIONS
Environmental Surveillance Program
Figure 3. Air sampling stations operating during the Pin Stripe Event.
-------
2. Milk Samples
The SWRHL. milk sampling program consists of a routine milk
sampling network, a standby milk sampling network, and special
sampling in the event of a release of airborne radioactivity from
nuclear testing activities.
From 20 to 30 producing dairy farms and individual family cows in
Nevada, western Utah, and eastern California, are routinely
sampled each month. The number sampled varies because of the
availability of fresh cows on ranches producing milk for their
own use. Normally these samples are collected by personnel from
the laboratory.
Approximately 155 producing dairies in 11 western states are
provided mail-in milk sample containers; pre-labeled, franked,
and with appropriate instructions. Any or all of these sampling
locations can be activated by telephone through the regional offices
of the Public Health Service. The regional office contacts the
appropriate state milk control agency which in turn contacts the
local milk control agency or the producer. A follow-up telegram
is sent to the regional Public Health Service office. This pro-
cedure requires from one to four days before the first sample is
collected, depending upon the organizational structure of the state
milk control agencies.
The SWRHL also conducts a continuous survey, of off-site milk
sampling locations. Possible sources for milk sampling are
indexed and located on milk sampling maps. In the event of a
release of radioactive effluent, monitors are able to begin sampling
an area immediately.
-------
3. Water Samples
Approximately 80 water samples are routinely collected each
month from wells, streams, ponds, lakes and urban water systems.
After a contaminating event, sampling is expanded to include all
domestic and livestock water sources in the affected area. Water
samples are collected at all locations where milk samples are
collected, -with the exception of the standby milk sampling net-
work. Precipitation samples are collected when possible.
4. Vegetation Samples
Vegetation samples are collected only after a known release of
radioactive effluent. These samples are collected to delineate
deposition pattern, to determine where milk samples should be
obtained, and to estimate radioisotope concentrations in milk.
In addition to the wild plants (such as creosote bush), pasture
and dry feed samples are collected when available.
Because of the highly variable collection ability of various plants,
the impossibility of establishing completely consistent collection
and counting techniques, and the highly complex role of micro-
meteorology in ground deposition, it is not practical to use
vegetation results to assess human exposures. Vegetation
sampling results are, therefore, reported as fresh fission pro-
ducts detectable or not detectable. At the time of the event,
dairy cattle in the fallout sectors were being fed stored feed, hay,
green chop and some cows were on pasture. Samples of the feed
which were representative of the cows' feed at different locations
were collected.
-------
5. In Vivo Thyroid Investigation
Seventy-eight off-site residents were counted for specific gamma
emitting isotopes in a mobile thyroid counting trailer following
this event.
10
-------
II. ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
A. Air Samples
All air samples are returned to the SWRHL in Las Vegas for analy-
sis. Filters are counted for gross beta activity in a Beckman
"Wide Beta" low background (6 i 1 cpm beta) proportional system
which has an efficiency of 45% for 0. 54 MeV betas. If significant
activity (lOpCi/m ) is detected on the initial count, a minimum
of two additional counts are made in the first 48 hours following
collection. All other filters are recounted at five and twelve days
after collection. Computation of activity is based on establishing
a decay constant for each sample and this constant is used to
extrapolate the activity to the end of the collection period. The
decay equation used is A/AQ= e
Gamma emitting isotopes on filter papers and charcoal cartridges are
identified and quantitated by placing them directly on a 4- by 4-inch
Nal(Tl) crystal coupled to a TMC Model 404-C gamma pulse height
analyzer calibrated for energies of 0-2 MeV. Quantities deter-
mined are extrapolated to the end of the collection period using
the individual decay constants.
Average concentration of activity during cloud passage cannot
always be calculated since it is not possible to define the duration
of cloud passage at all locations. However, the integrated air
3
concentrations, expressed as pCi-hr/m , may be directly com-
pared for the various stations, in addition to serving as a measure
of the potential inhalation exposure.
11
-------
B. Milk and Water Samples
Milk and water samples are collected in one-gallon quantities. These
samples are emptied into 3. 5-liter Marinelli beakers and are counted
on 4-by 4-inch crystals for gamma analysis. If, for any reason, a full
3. 5-liter sample cannot be obtained, the sample volume is increased
to 3. 5 liters by the addition of distilled water to maintain a uniform
counting geometry, and appropriate adjustments are made to
calculate the activity concentration in the original sample. When
this is done, the threshold detectabilities given in Table 1 are
proportionately increased. In addition to gamma spectrometry,
most milk samples containing radioiodine are analyzed by radio-
89-90
chemistry for Sr after gamma analysis.
C. Vegetation Samples
Upon arrival in the laboratory, vegetation samples are placed in clean
plastic bags and are given an immediate count on a 4- by 4-inch
Nal(Tl) crystal, connected to a sealer-timer, for gross gamma
activity to determine which samples and, therefore, which locations
may have been contaminated. The samples are then analyzed by
gamma spectroscopy on the same systems as the other sample
types.
D. Sensitivity
Statistical evaluation of gamma spectral analyses is difficult and
open to discussion. However, on the basis of experience •with
various types of samples, empirical values have been determined
as the approximate threshold detectabilities for various isotopes
on the sample types usually collected. These are listed in Table 1
and necessarily include the following assumptions:
12
-------
a. Count time in days after formation as indicated by
footnotes.
b. Prefilters collect unfractionated fission products
resulting in a complex spectrum.
c. MSA charcoal collects gaseous fission products only
(primarily iodines).
d. An eight isotope matrix is employed for computation
and isotopes other than those examined are present in
amounts which are small relative to those eight.
e. Natural activity on air samples is approximately five
times system background.
Table 1. Threshold detectability at time of count of several radio-
nuclides in various samples, pCi.
Sample
type
Filter
Charcoal
Cartridge
Water
(pCi/1)
Milk
(pCi/1)
Notes
1
2
1
2
3
4
131i
500
200
200
100
20
20
132Te-I 133! U5I '37Cs
1000 500 1000
200
400 200
100
40-50 20-3040-50
20-30 10
140
Ba-La
500
200
400
20
20
Length of
count
10 min.
10 min.
10 min.
10 min.
40 min.
40 min.
1 - Counted at less than 3 days after formation
2 - Counted at 3 days or more after formation
3 - With 137Cs = 10° Pci
4 - Assuming insignificant amounts of other nuclides, and all given isotopes
less than 10 times the detection limit.
13
-------
III. RESULTS
The Pin Stripe venting resulted in gaseous and particulate con-
tamination in the off-site populated areas.
Ground monitors were positioned according to data obtained from
aerial and on-site monitoring and U. S. Weather Bureau predic-
tions (ESSA-ARL). Wind speeds and directions for five periods
before and after detonation are shown in Table 2.
Table 2. Upper air data from Yucca Lake on April 25, 1966.
Height
(Ft. MSL)
Surface
1
1
5,
6,
7,
9,
0,
1,
12,
13,
14,
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
Wind direction
0600
Calm
230/04
250/12
240/09
250/11
250/07
230/02
210/02
190/02
240/06
& speed (Deg/Kts) at times indie ated(hrs/PDT)
1142
170/
220/
230/
230/
12
10
13
10
220/07
220/
05
220/06
210/
08
210/08
270/
10
1400
230/
220/
220/
220/
210/
190/
190/
220/
13
06
10
13
10
12
14
10
220/08
270/
08
1525
220/
220/
220/
12
12
10
230/08
230/
240/
230/
240/
250/
270/
10
12
13
13
13
14
1600
ISO/
200/
210/
220/
230/
10
10
12
11
11
230/06
240/07
260/
250/
280/
12
11
13
A. Exposure Rate Measurements
1. Aerial Monitoring
The cloud tracking mission of the U. S. Air Force U-3A aircraft
lasted from 1135 to 1642 hours, PDT. Since the measurements
14
-------
taken by this aircraft serve only to augment the effectiveness of
the surveillance program (particularly the positioning of ground
monitors), and do not represent exposures to people on the
ground, they are not presented in this report.
2. Ground Monitoring
Pin Stripe effluent was first detected off-site, northeast of Groom
Lake at 1355 hours and arrived at Highway 25, 6. 5 miles W of
Hancock Summit at 1435. By 1630 hours, gamma exposure rates
above background were detected from Coyote Summit to Alamo,
Nevada, along Highways 25 and 93. Cloud arrival at various locations
indicated the cloud was moving at about 15-17 miles per hour. The
furthest north that effluent was detected by a ground monitor was
at Pioche, 112 miles northeast of ground zero. The cloud reached
this location at about 1800 hours. Exposure rates along Highway 25
ranged from 0. 07 to 6. 0 mR/hr with the majority of the readings
around 1. 0 mR/hr. The maximum exposure rate measured
(at 3 feet above ground level) in the off-site area was 8 mR/hr,
net gamma, between 1402 and 1405 hours, PDT, 18 miles NE of
Groom Lake. This location is along a gravel road used only
occasionally by vehicles.
The maximum reading at a continuously populated area was 1. 5 mR/hr
at Hiko at 1600, PDT. Selected monitoring data are presented in
Table 3. Estimated infinite whole body gamma exposures derived
from ground monitoring data at two locations are shown in Table 4.
These estimated infinite exposures are based on monitoring
readings obtained after cloud passage and not on the peak readings
obtained during cloud passage.
15
-------
Table 3. Selected ground monitoring results in off-site populated
areas April 25, 1966, at 3 feet above ground level.*
Location
Alamo
Ash Springs
Caliente
Hiko
Pioche
Time of peak
Y exposure
rate PDT
1555-1600
1610
1814
1600
1840-1856
Net peak Y ex-
posure rate
mR/hr*
0.23
0.9
0.02
1.5
0.05
*E-500B portable survey instrument.
Table 4. Estimated infinite gamma exposure at two populated
locations.
Location
Hiko, Nevada
Alamo, Nevada
Net V at 24 hrs
0. 1
0. 04
Infinite exposure
12 mR
5 mR
3. Exposure Rate Recorders
RM-11 recorder charts collected after the Pin Stripe Event showed
exposure rates above background at Alamo, Caliente and Pioche.
Results are shown in Table 5.
Table 5. Exposure rates occurring off the test range complex on
April 25, 1966, as measured by RM-11 recorders.
Location
Alamo
Caliente
Pioche
Time of peak
exposure rate
(PST)
4/25
4/25
4/25
1600
1755-1805
1845
Time exposure rates Net peak ex-
rose above background posure rate
mR/hr
4/25,
4/25,
4/25,
4/25,
1510
1740
1925
1750
0. 15
0.01
0.04
4. Film Badges
One film badge collected after the Pin Stripe Event showed
16
-------
an exposure at the detection limit. This badge was taken
from a film badge station at Hancock Summit, an unpopulated
location on Highway 25. This badge showed a total exposure of
30 mR and was exposed from 3/31/66 - 5/10/66. TLD's from
Hancock Summit showed no detectable exposures above normal
background levels, nor did TLD's from any other location show
net exposures above background.
No personnel badges showed exposures at or above the detection limit.
B. Environmental Sampling
1. Air Sampling
Nineteen permanent air sampling stations and five temporary-
portable stations in the off-site area showed detectable amounts
of fresh fission products (primarily radioiodines) on prefilters,
cartridges, or both. These stations are shown in Figure 4. The
area in which fresh fission products were found by air sampling,
extended to Indio, California, on the south; Ridgecrest, California,
on the west; Salt Lake City, Utah, to the northeast; and Denver,
Colorado,to the east.
Wind direction on the day of the event was from the southwest,
therefore the highest concentrations were found to the northeast of
surface ground zero. Comparison of radioiodine concentration on pre-
filters and charcoal cartridges suggests that the radioiodines were
mostly particulate. This assumption is strengthened by the fact
•
that considerable visible material was ejected at the time of the
detonation.
Wind direction changed approximately 180 late on April 26 or early
on April 27. Seepage of gaseous material from surface zero con-
tinued for several days. This material was carried to the south
17
-------
Air sampling stations showing detectable amounts
of radioiodines
NOT SHOWN : DENVER. COLORADO, DURANGO, COLORADO. INDIO. CALIFORNIA
Figure 4.
18
-------
and was detected by air samplers as far south as Indio, California.
3 131
A small amount (0. 5 pCi/m ) of I was detected on a charcoal
cartridge exposed at Alamo, Nevada,as late as May 3. Examination
of air filters was limited to gamma pulse height analysis and gross
beta counting. It is not possible, therefore, to definitely determine
whether such a small amount of radioiodine was gaseous material
from continuing seepage or resuspension of particulate material
deposited earlier. By May 4 no stations showed detectable amounts
of fresh fission products.
Table 7 lists eight stations where concentrations of I were in
excess of 50 pCi/m . All other stations, where gamma pulse
O 1 o 1
height analysis was performed on filters, were below 10 pCi/m I.
All stations showing detectable amounts of I are listed in
Appendix I.
2. Water Sampling
A total of 187 water samples was collected by the off-site sur-
veillance program for Pin Stripe. Sampling locations are shown
in Figure 5, and all water sampling results are listed in Ap-
pendix II. Four samples from one domestic tap showed measureable
concentrations of I. These are shown in Table 6. These COncen-
131
trations of I at the Davis Ranch were due to the completely open
supply from which the domestic water was taken.
131
Table 6. Domestic water supply samples containing I pCi/1.
Location
Hiko, Nevada
Davis Ranch
Davis Ranch
Davis Ranch
Datp
Col- Source
lected
4/26 Open tank
4/27
4/28
4/30 ...'!....".
Gross
Beta*
151
35
19
8
Gross
Alpha
1.4
0.1
2.5
.3.3
131 132 133 135
3860 80 270
50 30 60
30 -
: 40.
^Activity other than iodine.
19
-------
Table 7. Air sampling stations with concentrations of I in excess of 50 pCi/m on prefilters.
COLLECTION
Sampling Period Tot&1 Vol_
Location April 1966
Start Stop HrS' "™f
Day Hr Day Hr (m '
6. 5 mi W of 25 1413 25 1700 3.1 26
Hancock Summit
18 mi NE of 25 140025 1535 1.6 32
Groom Lake
Hancock Summit 25 1435 25 1745 3.1 32
N Ash Springs, 25 143025 1755 3.3 35
0 Nevada
Hiko- 25 1430 25 1810 3.8 35
Crystal Springs
Hiko, Nevada 25 0810 25 1800 10.9 226
Pioche, Nevada 25 1525 25 1925 3.9 .81
Alamo, Nevada 25 0730 26 0725 23.8 407
ISOTOPIC ANALYSIS
Col-
lector
P
C
P
C
P
C
P
C
P
C
P
C
P
C
P
C
Gross Beta I
_.. 3 pCi-Hr _. . 3 pCi-Hr
pCi/m pCi/m
m m
50,000 160,000 3,500
150
45,000 72,000 5,100
290
34,000 110,000 2,600
170
25,000 83,000 5,300
130
21,000 80,000 1,600
400
3,500 38,000 510
39
2,200 9,000 1,100
53
710 17,000 57
19
11,000
470
8,200
460
8, 100
530
17,000
430
6.100
1,500
5,600
430
4,300
210
1,400
450
132I
pCi/m3
12,
1,
38,
2,
8,
1,
18,
6,
1,
1.
000
200
000
600
900
500
000
950
800
200
900
330
ZOO
40
140
86
pCi-Hr
3
m
37,000
3,700
61,000
4,200
28,000
4,600
59 ,000
3.100
26,000
4,600
21,000
3,600
800
160
3,300
2,000
133I
pCi/m3
4, 100
500
12,000
!8'80
3, 000
660
5,600
290
1,900
800
•650
:150
3:50
250
110
75
pCi-Hr
3
m
13,000
1,600
19,000
i , 400
9,300
2,000
18,000
960
7,200
3,000
7, 100
1,600
1,400
970
2,600
1,800
135I
pCi/m
19
7
78
16
17
10
32
6
10
7
3
1
,000
,800
,000
,000
,000
,000
,000
,300
,000
,000
,600
,700
ND
600
220
100
pCi-Hr
3
m
59,000
24,000
120,000
26,000
53,000
31,000
110,000
21,000
3g, 000
27,000
39,000
19,000
ND
2,300
5,200
2,400
P - Whatman 541 filter(prefilter)
C - Mine Safety Appliance Co. Charcoal cartridge
Gross beta and radionuclide data extrapolated to end of collection period
pCi-Hr was computed using the actual sampling time, which in some cases will differ from the total time between time on and time off,
3 which may be only approximate.
-------
Areas where one or more water samples were collected
Figure 5.
21
-------
3. Vegetation Samples
Five hundred and seventy-one vegetation samples from 123 locations
were collected and analyzed for gamma emitting isotopes. Of these,
fresh fission products were found at 95 separate locations.
All sampling locations are listed in Appendix III and the general
areas sampled are shown on Figure 6. For the reasons stated in
Operational Procedures, vegetation samples are shown as fresh
fission products detected or not detected.
4. Milk Samples
Six hundred and fifty-five milk samples from 80 separate dairies,
processing plants, or individual ranches, were collected for the
Pin Stripe Event. Six hundred and fifty milk samples were analyzed
for gamma emitting isotopes and selected samples were subjected
89 90
to Sr and Sr analysis. Of the 650 samples with complete gam-
ma information, 187 contained detectable amounts of I. The
maximum concentration of I was found in a sample from the
Schofield Dairy at Hiko, Nevada. This sample had a concentration
of 4800 pCi/1 and was collected April 27, 1966. Four other locations
had peak I concentrations above 1000 pCi/1. These were the
L. Lee Dairy at Alamo, Nevada, (1400 pCi/1); the Sharp Ranch at
Alamo (2100 pCi/1); the Davis Ranch at Hiko (3500 pCi/1); and the
Donahue Ranch at Ursine, Nevada, (1100 pCi/1). By the second day
after the event, several factors had modified the normal disposition
of milk from the five locations mentioned above. All the milk being
produced by family cows at the Davis, Donahue, and Sharp Ranches
was taken for sampling purposes. Uncontaminated milk and dairy
products were substituted in lieu of cash payments. At the Schofield Dairy
at Hiko, stored hay from Utah was purchased by the Government and
substituted for the green chop being fed at that time. The feed
22
-------
/ PIOCHE
HIKO '
If CALIENTE
"8
Vegetation with fresh fission products detected
Vegetation with fresh fission products not detected
Figure 6. Vegetation sampling along roads.
23
-------
substitution program is the subject of another report, "Preventive Action
Taken at Schofield's Dairy, Hiko, Nevada, Following an Accidental
Release of Radioactivity from the Nevada Test Site, " - SWRHL-56r.
^
Milk from the L. Lee Dairy and the Schofield Dairy was diluted
with uncontaminated milk from dairies outside the affected
areas. Sampling of milk from the tank truck at the processing
plant showed a maximum of 100 pCi/1 I. Milk collected at the
retail outlets from this processing plant showed no detectable
radioiodines. Milk sampling locations are shown in Figures 7
and 8. Table 8 lists milk samples with the highest I con-
centrations from each location sampled. Appendix IV lists the
results of all milk samples collected for this event. Figure 9
shows I concentration versus time at the Sharp Ranch in
Alamo, Nevada.
5. Feed Substitution Study
The decision to substitute dry hay was prompted by vegetation
sampling of green alfalfa feed from the Schofield Dairy. By 0300
on the morning of April 26, results from gamma analysis of these
samples indicated the possibility of I levels in milk reaching
4
5x10 pCi/1. PHS and AEC officials decided to substitute dry hay to
keep radioiodine levels as low as possible, and to provide experi-
mental information under actual field conditions for future
planning purposes. Four cows from the Schofield Dairy herd were
rented by the SWRHL. and continued on the fresh alfalfa. All the
milk from these four cows was withheld from consumption.
Figure 10 compares the milk from these four cows, and the milk
131
from the remainder of the herd. Measured levels of I peaked
out at less then 1/10 predicted levels. The reasons for this
disparity are not completely understood. Analysis of milk samples
from other dairies or ranches in the area showed I
24
-------
Milk sampling locations
(number shows separate locations in area)
Figure 7.
25
-------
MOUNTAI/J HOME
BUHL
IDAHO FALLS • I
•BLACKFOOT
• JEROME »POCATELLO
JUHL 0 ^BURLEY I
T 1
• SMITHFIELD
OGDEN« I
• SALT LAKE CITY
•SPANISH FORK
• Mt. PLEASANT
'GARRISON
MINERSVILLE* « BEAVER
•CEDAR CITY (2)
MOCCASIN* •FREDONIA
• Mt. TRUMBULL
• BARSTOW
NEWHALL
LOS ANGELES
• RIVERSIDE
• ESCONDIDO
• •BRAWLEY
RIVERTON
•CASPER
• RAWLINS
CHEYENNE*
• CRAIG
• Ft. COLLINS
• BRUSH
• GLENWOOD SPRINGS
I • GRAND JUNCTION
DELTA
• COLORADO SPRJNGS
• CANON CITY I
• ROCKY FORD
• MONTE VISTA
DURANGO
• ALAMOSA
5TA I
'+ TRINIDAD [
Figure 8. Milk sampling locations other than in Nevada.
26
-------
Table 8. Milk samples containing highest levels of
showed fresh fission products.
131
I from each location that
Collection Data
Location
Alamo, Nevada
Wright Dairy
Leo Stewart Dairy
M. K. Stewart Dairy
Sharp Ranch
L. Lee Dairy
Frehner Dairy
Caliente, Nevada
Young Ranch
Charlton Ranch
Raymond Ranch
Tennille Ranch
Hiko, Nevada
Davis Ranch
Schofield Dairy
Las Vegas, Nevada
Anderson Dairy #4
(milk from Alamo)
Panaca, Nevada
E. Deck Ranch
K. Lee Ranch
Pioche,' Nevada
Del Mue Ranch
Ursine, Nevada
Donahue Ranch
Date of
milking
4/26/66
4/27/66
4/28/66
4/28/66
4/28/66
5/09/66
5/10/66
4/27/66
4/28/66
4/30/66
4/28/66
4/30/66
5/01/66
4/27/66
4/27/66
5/16/66
5/19/66
4/27/66
4/30/66
4/27/66
4/28/66
Analytical
Data
Activity (pCi/1)
131I
50
270
590
2100
1400
60
60
30
30
30
130
100
50
3500
4800
100
100
70
170
30
1100
27
I33i
330
850
770
5100
1800
ND
ND
90
70
ND
ND
500
ND
7800
12, 000
ND
ND
220
60
ND
1200
137_
Cs
45
45
ND
ND
ND
20
25
30
30 .
15
85
ND
45
ND
ND
15
20
60
40
60
45
89C
Sr
90
Sr
ND* 3
ND
ND
5
ND
No
ND
No
No
ND
No
ND
ND
15
10
ND
ND
No
ND
No
ND
6
4
3
6
Chemistry
2
Chemistry
Chemistry
4
Chemistry
10
3
4
3
5
5
Chemistry
8
Chemistry
15
-------
Table 8. Milk samples containing highest levels of
showed fresh fission products, (continued)
131
I from each location that
Collection Data
Location
Fredonia, Arizona
Button Ranch
Mt. Trumbull, Arizona
O. Bundy Ranch
Spanish Fork, Utah
Town Pride Dairy
Idaho Falls, Idaho
Wallace Dairy
Date of
milking
5/02/66
5/02/66
4/28/66
4/29/66
Analytical Data
Activity (pCi/1)
131_ 133T 137_ 89C
I I Cs Sr
70 ND 45 ND
20 ND 35 ND
60 ND 85 ND
70 ND 30 ND
90
Sr
10
6
10
10
89 133
*ND = Not detected. Minimum detectable levels are: ,,7Sr, 5 pCi/1; I, 20pCi/l;
Cs, 10 pCi/1.
Note: The strontium results listed are, for the most part, composites of 3 or 4 days
samples. Compositing was necessary because of the large number of samples
processed following this event.
28
-------
10,000—1
5,000—
MAXIMUM CONCENTRATION FOUND IN ANY SAMPLE FROM EITHER OF THE LOCATIONS
1000-
500-
100 —
$0—
1 \ 4—1
12 IS !• 11 M 27 30
Days after detonation i Pin Stripe Event
33
34 3*
Figure 9. I concentration in milk from two cows on pasture in
Alamo, Nevada.
29
-------
10.000—i
Dry hay from Utah substituted for grean chop
3,000—
1000—
500
Four cows held on
green chop
Cows put on dry hay
100—
\
\
15 M >S 10 15 40
Days after detonation | Pin Stripe Event
Figure 10. Comparison of I concentration in milk from the same
dairy after substitution of dry hay for green chop.
30
-------
concentrations well within acceptable limits. A detailed report of the
results of this experiment was released by the Bioenvironmental
Research Program of the SWRHL, "Dairy Farm Radioiodine Studies
Following the Pin Stripe Event of April 25, 1966, " - SWRHL-41r.
6. Thyroid Analysis
The Pin Stripe Event provided the first opportunity to use the
SWRHL thyroid analysis trailer under actual field conditions. The
trailer is a commercially available travel trailer equipped with
a 5- by 2-inch Nal crystal detector, multi-channel analyzer, and proper
shadow shielding. The trailer, with generator equipped pick-up,
is completely self contained and it is possible to determine actual
thyroid exposures in the field. Based on information derived from
aircraft measurements and reported iodine measurements in some
milk samples, the thyroid analysis trailer was moved to the Alamo
area. The first measurements were made 50 hours following the
venting at a ranch 15 miles north of Alamo; however, high back-
grounds and extremely low thyroid burdens necessitated moving
the thyroid trailer into the town of Alamo for most of the
measurements.
Spectra taken at this time were characterized by rather large
132
quantities of I. As an initial, and certainly conservative,esti-
mate of the exposure, the Te precursor was assumed to be fixed
132
in the body with the I in equilibrium. Measurements taken
several days later demonstrated that this probably was not the
132 132
case. The I peaks were probably due to external Te on the
132
children and small lung burdens of Te.
The trailer was taken to Ursine, Nevada,on April 30, 1966, and
children representing families from Pioche, Panaca, and Ursine
were counted. The highest dose measured at this location was
below 50 mrad.
31
-------
All exposures were computed assuming inhalation at the time of
cloud passage. The dose conversion factors used were 0. OZ8 mrad/
133
pCi/gram thyroid for I, and 0. 128 mrad/pCi/gram thyroid for
I. Theoretical thyroid weights for children were used to cal-
culate the exposures from the burdens measured by the thyroid
counter.
A summary of all the information obtained is shown in Table 9.
The information in the table represents the maximum upper
limits of possible thyroid absorbed doses.
Table 9. Number of people within a given range of computed thyroid
dose.
Location
Alamo
Hiko
Ursine
Pioche
Panaca
Back-
ground
10
5
4
1
5
BKG-50 mrad
17
19
1
0
0
50-150 mrad
6
8
0
0
0
150-300 mrad
0
2
0
0
0
Total
33
34
5
1
5
Male children - 37
Female children - 33
Female adults - 8
32 ,
-------
IV. CONCLUSIONS
The sampling and analysis of environmental factors following the
Pin Stripe Event was extensive and a large effort was made to
document the external and internal exposures to ionizing radiation
resulting from Pin Stripe.
A. External Exposures
Whole body gamma exposure resulting from Pin Stripe
effluent was determined by portable and fixed radiac
instruments. Projection of infinite exposures from survey
instrument readings taken on the day following the con-
taminating event, indicated a maximum infinite external
exposure to any populated area to be 12 mR. Perhaps the most
meaningful comparison that might be made of such an ex-
posure is to compare it with background radiation expo-
sures. Measurement of background exposures by
thermoluminescent dosimeters from several locations
throughout the state, show a range of approximately
100-200 mR/year. Thus, an infinite exposure dose of 12 mR
would add about 10% to normal yearly background
radiation.
B. Internal Exposures
The thyroid analysis trailer provided the PHS with an
invaluable tool for evaluating radioiodine thyroid burdens
of off-site residents. Due to the relatively low levels of
iodine isotopes contained in the thyroids of those people
33
-------
analyzed, the results are given in ranges rather than
specific doses for each individual. Two individuals
from the Hiko area showed thyroid absorbed doses in the
150-300 mrad range.
C. Health Implications
Considering the extremely small internal and external
doses resulting from the Pin Stripe Event, it is concluded
that the exposure to additional ionizing radiation was
negligible.
34
-------
APPENDICES
Appendix I. Additional Air Sampling Results, April 1966 35
Appendix II. Complete Water Sampling Data 42
Appendix III. Vegetation Sampling Data 50
Appendix IV. Complete Milk Sampling Data 59
-------
Appendix I. Additional Air Sampling Results, April, 1966.
GO
cn
Location
Baker, Calif.
Death Valley Jet. ,
Calif.
Indio, Calif.
Ridgecrest, Calif.
Shoshone, Calif.
Sampling
Start
Day Hr
26
27
28
29
26
26
26
27
27
28
28
29
29
30
30
26
•27
28
26
27
28
25
26
27
28
29
1400
1400
1400
1400
0645
0645
0645
0645
0645
0645
0645
0645
0645
0645
0645
1000
1000
1015
1310
1352
1309
1008
1039
1741
1608
1903
Period
Stop
Day Hr
27
28
29
30
27
27
27
28
28
29
29
30
30
01
01
27
28
29
27
28
29
26
27
28
29
30
1400
1400
1400
1400
0645
0645
0645
0645
0645
0645
0645
0645
0645
0700
0700
1000
1015
1000
1347
1301
1520
1037
1738
1604
1900
1655
Total
Time
(Hr)
24.0
24.0
24.0
24.0
24.0
24.0
24.0
24.0
24.0
24.0
24.0
23.9
23.9
24. 3
24. 3
24.0
24. 2
23.7
26.6
23.2
24. 1
24.4
31.2
22.4
26.7
22.0
Collection
Sample _ ,
,, , Col-
Volume
, 3, lector
(m3)
460
485
472
472
448
448
448
485
485
472
472
483
483
491
491
361
364
357
455
409
474
455
566
441
512
410
P
P
P
P
P
P
C
P
C
P
C
P
C
P
C
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
Beta
Activity
(pCi/m3)
53.
1.
2.
0.
34.
34.
0.
1.
0.
0.
1.
4.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
64
1.
1.
0.
0
2
1
18
0
0
78
3
22
18
1
1
77
12
41
22
01
6
1
70
Results
Beta
Exposure 131I 132Te-I 133I '
(pCi-hr/m3) pCi/m3 pCi-hr/m3 pCi/m3 pCi-hr/m3 pCi/m3 pCi-hr/m3 pCi/m3
1300 9.3 220 3.7 88 280 6,600 ND
29 NGS*
50
4. 3
820 5.2 120 19 460 ND ND ND
820 5.2 120 19 460 ND ND ND
NGS*
19
31
5.2
4. 4 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
NGS*
26
99 0.54 13 ND ND ND ND ND
18 NGS*
3. 2 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
9.5 0. 28 6. 5 ND ND ND ND ND
5. 3 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
0. 24 NGS*
2000 9.31 290 29 910 99.3 3,100 ND
36 NGS*
29
15. ND ND ND ND ND ND ND
I35j
pCi-hr/m3
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
-------
Aooendix I. Additional Air Sampling Results, April, 1966 (continued)
co
Location
Denver. Colo.
Durango, Colo.
Alamo, Nevada
Sampling
Start
Day Hr
26
26
27
27
25
25
26
26
27
25
25
26
26
27
27
28
28
29
29
30
30
01
01
02
02
03
03
0900
0900
0900
0900
1830
1830
1830
1830
1832
0730
0730
0725
0725
0745
0745
0805
0805
0715
0715
0725
0725
0735
0735
0740
0740
0700
0700
Period
Stop
Dav Hr
27
27
28
28
26
26
27
27
28
26
26
27
27
28
28
29
29
30
30
01
01
02
02
03
03
04
04
0900
0900
0915
0915
1829
1829
1830
1830
1830
0725
0725
0745
0745
0805
0805
0715
0715
0725
0725
0735
0735
0740
0740
0700
0700
0730
0730
Total
Time
(Hr)
23.
23.
24.
24.
24.
24.
24.
24.
23.
23.
23.
24.
24.
24.
24.
23.
23.
24.
24.
24.
24.
24.
24.
23.
23.
24.
24.
9
9
2
2
0
0
0
0
9
8
8
3
3
2
2
2
2
1
1
2
2
1
1
2
2
5
5
Collection
Sample _ Beta Beta
Volume Activity Exposure
(m3) lector (pCi/m3) (pCi-hr/m3)
495
495
489
489
485
485
472
472
983
407
407
453
453
464
464
445
445
437
437
476
476
437
437
433
433
482
482
P 1.3 31
C
P 0.13 3.1
C
P 2.0 48
C
P 0.41 9.8
C
P 0. 22 5. 2
P 710 17,000
C
P 44 1,100
C
P 0.53 13
C
P 3. 1 72
C
P 1.4 34
C
P 0.40 9.7
C
P 0.31 7.5
C
P 0.31 7.1
C
P 1.11 27
C
13
PCi/m3
0. 27
ND
ND
ND
0. 32
0.42
ND
ND
ND
57
19
2.0
ND
ND
0.88
24
0.77
ND
0.53
ND
0.45
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.50
'I
pCi-hr /m3
6.4
ND
ND
ND
7.7
10-
ND
ND
ND
1,400
450
49
ND
ND
21
560
18
ND
13
ND
11
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
12
Results
I32Te-I 133I
pCi/m3 pCi-hr/m3 pCi/m3 pCi-hr/m3 pCi/m
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.7
ND
ND
ND
ND
140
86
4.2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
41
ND
ND
ND
ND
3, 300
2,000
100
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
3.2
ND
ND
ND
ND
110
75
3.6
ND
ND
1. 1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
77
ND
ND
ND
ND
2,600
1,800
87
ND
ND
27
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
220
100
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1351
3 pCi-hr/m3
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
5,200
2,400
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
-------
Appendix I. Additional Air Sampling Results, April, 1966 (continued)
co
Location
Alamo Nevada
(continued)
Ash Springs,
Nevada
Caliente, Nevada
Currant, Nevada
Geyser Maint. Sta. ,
Nevada
Sampling
Start
Day Hr
04
04
05
05
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
26
26
27
28
29
30
25
25
26
26
27
27
25
26
27
0730
0730
0715
0715
1430
1430
1755
1755
0830
1510
1915
1915
0830
0830
0845
0810
0825
0825
0715
0715
0715
0715
0715
0715
1608
1603
1618
Collection
Period Total Sample Beta
Stop Time Volume Activity
Day Hr (Hr) (m3) lector (pCi/m3T
05
05
06
06
25
25
26
26
25
25
26
26
27
27
28
29
30
01
26
26
27
27
28
28
26
27
28
0715
0715
0700
0700
1755
1755
1210
1210
1910
1910
0830
0830
0845
0845
0810
0825
0825
0730
0715
0715
0715
0715
0715
0715
1600
1615
1825
23.
23.
23.
23.
3.
3.
18.
18.
10.
4.
13.
13.
24.
24
23.
24.
24.
23.
24.
24.
24.
24.
24.
24.
24.
23.
26.
8
8
7
7
4
4
3
3
6
0
2
2
2
. 2
2
2
0
0
4
4
5
5
4
4
.6
6
6
420
420
430
430
35
35
187
187
230
92
287
287
526
526
493
514
509
488
543
543
545
545
543
543
459
465
483
P
C
P
C
P
C
P
C
P
C
P
C
P
C
P
P
P
P
P
C
P
C
P
C
P
P
P
0. 39
0. 13
25,000
98
120
6.8
0.64
0. 14
0.74
0. 36
0. 10
0.06
0. 16
0. 10
5.7
0. 17
0. 16
Beta
Ex_posure
(pCi-hr/m3)
9.4
3.0
85, 000
1,800
1, 300
90
3. 2
18
8.6
2. 1
1. 3
3.9
2.4
140
4.0
4. 3
Results
131X 132Te-I
pCi/m3 pCi-hr/m3 pCi/m3 pCi-hr/m3 pCi/m
5, 300
130
9. 3
9. 1
7. 0
7.6
ND
1. 2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.41
ND
0.76
18,000
430
170
170
74
30
ND
16
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
10
ND
18,000
950
18
ND
15
ND
ND
0.65
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NGS*
61,000 5,
3,200
330
ND
160
ND
ND
8.6
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NGS*
ND
ND
ND
ND
600
290
17
48
17
31
ND
2. 5
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
133X 135X
3 pCi-hr/m3 pCi/m3 pCi-hr/m3
19, 000
990
310
880
180
120
ND
33
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
32,000
6, 300
32
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.7
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
110,000
21,000
590
ND
ND
ND
ND
22
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NGS*
ND
1. 2
ND
ND
ND
30
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
4. 0
ND
ND
ND
98
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
-------
Appendix I. Additional Air Sampling Results, April, 1966 (continued)
co
00
Location
Groom Lake -
18 mi. NE, Nevada
Hancock Summit,
Nevada
Hancock Summit -
6. 5 mi. W, Nevada
Hiko - Crystal
Springs, Nevada
Sampling
Start
Day Hr
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
26
26
27
27
28
28
29
29
30
30
01
01
1400
1400
1435
1435
1413
1413
1430
1430
0810
0810
1800
1800
0950
0950
0800
0800
0800
0800
0805
0805
0805
0805
0805
0805
Period Total
Stop Time
Day Hr (Hr)
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
26
26
27
27
28
28
29
29
30
30
01
01
02
02
1535
1535
1745
1745
1700
1700
1810
1810
1800
1800
0950
0950
0800
0800
0800
0800
0805
0805
0805
0805
0805
0805
0805
0805
1.6
1.6
3. 1
3. 1
2.8
2.8
3.7
3.7
10.9
10.9
14.0
14.0
22. 1
22. 1
24.0
24. 0
24. 1
24. 1
24.0
24.0
24.0
24.0
24.0
24.0
Collection
Sample Beta Beta
Volume Activity Exposure
(m3) 6C °r (pCi/m3) (pCi-hr/m3)
32
32
32
32
26
26
35
35
226
226
290
290
458
458
497
497
499
499
497
497
497
497
497
497
P 45,000 72,000
C
P 34,000 110,000
C
P 50,000 140,000
C
P 21,000 78,000
C
P 3,500 38,000
C
P 100 1,400
C
P 16 360
C
P 0. 58 14
C
P 4.7 110
C
P 0.60 14
C
P 0.54 13
C
P 0.24 5.7
C
i
pCi/m3
5, 100
290
2,600
170
3, 500
150
1,600
400
510
39
9.6
52
3. 1
1.7
ND
ND
0.84
0. 71
0. 20
0. 57
ND
0.62
ND
ND
Results
31I 132Te-I '
pCi-hr/m3 pCi/m3 pCi-hr/m3 pCi/m3
8, 200
460
8, 100
530
9,700
420
5,900
1,500
5,600
435
130
730
69
38
ND
ND
20
17
4.8
14
ND
15
ND
ND
38,000
2,600
8,900
1,500
12,000
1, 200
6,800
1, 200
1,900
330
22
84
8.8
0.97
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
61,000
4, 200
28,000
4,600
34, 000
3,400
25,000
4,400
21,000
3, 600
300
1, 200
200
21
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
12, 000
880
3,000
660
4, 100
500
1,900
800
650
150
16
290
12
7. 1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
33I 135I
pCi-hr/m3 pCi/m3 pCi-hr/m3
19,000
1,400
9, 300
2,000
11,000
1,400
7, 000
3,000
7, 100
1,600
220
4, 100
270
160
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
78, 000
16, 000
17, 000
10,000
19,000
7,800
10, 000
7,000
3,600
1,700
27
86
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
120, 000
26, 000
53,000
31,000
53, 000
22, 000
37,000
26,000
39,000
19,000
380
1, 200
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
-------
Appendix I. Additional Air Sampling Results, April, 1966 (continued)
Location
Lathrop Wells,
Nevada
Moapa - Warm
Springs Ranch,
Nevada
Pahrump, Nevada
Sampling
Start
Day Hr
25
25
26
26
27
27
28
28
29
29
25
25
26
26
27
27
28
28
29
29
25
26
27
29
30
0635
0635
0635
0635
0625
0625
0545
0545
0605
0605
0800
0800
0800
0800
0830
0830
0800
0800
0800
0800
1200
1200
1200
1200
Collection
Period Total Sample
Stop Time Volume
Day Hr (Hr) (m3) leCt°r
26
26
27
27
28
28
29
29
01
01
26
26
27
27
28
28
29
29
30
30
26
27
29
30
01
0635
0635
0625
0625
0545
0545
0605
0605
0605
0605
0800
0800
0830
0830
0800
0800
0800
0800
0800
0800
1200
1200
1200
1200
23.9
23.9
23.8
23.8
23.3
23.3
24. 2
24. 2
48.0
48.0
23.0
23.0
24. 5
24, 5
23.5
23.5
24.0
24.0
24.0
24.0
23.6
24. 1
48.0
23.7
24. 3
483
483
469
469
471
471
476
476
945
945
476
476
470
470
451
451
497
497
460
460
440
450
846
442
478
P
C
P
C
P
C
P
C
P
C
P
C
P
C
P
C
P
C
P
C
P
P
P
P
P
Beta Beta
Activity Exposure
(pCi/m3) (pCi-hr/m3)
0.
2.
0.
0.
0.
0.
10 2.4
8 67
77 18
91
24
13 3
0.42 10
0.
1.
0.
0.
12.
1.
0.
0.
27 6. 3
1 26
42 10
12 2.8
0 290
4 67
31 7.3
31 7.5
pCi/m3 pCi-hr/m3
ND
0.48
ND
ND
ND
ND
0. 20
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.81
ND
ND
ND
ND
11
ND
ND
ND
ND
4.9
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
44
ND
ND
ND
Results
132Te-I 133I
pCi/m3 pCi-hr/m3 pCi/m3 pCi-hr/m3
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
5. 1
ND
ND
ND
ND
NGS*
ND
NGS*
ND
NGS*
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NGS*
120
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
pC i/m3 pCi-hr/m3
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
-------
Appendix I. Additional Air Sampling Results, April, 1966 (continued)
Sampling
Location f &
Start
Day Hr
Pioche, Nevada 25
25
25
25
25
26
27
28
29
Cedar City, Utah 25
25
26
§
Garrison, Utah 25
26
Headquarters Desert 25
Experimental Station, .,
Utah
27
Provo, Utah 25
26
26
27
27
0800
1525
1525
1925
1925
0800
0800
0800
0800
1225
1225
1225
1225
0800
0800
0815
0833
0815
0852
0855
0855
0900
0900
Period Total
Stop Time
Day Hr (Hr)
25
25
25
26
26
27
28
29
30
26
26
27
27
26
27
26
27
28
26
27
27
28
28
1520
1928
1928
0800
0800
0800
0800
0800
0800
1225
1225
1445
1445
0800
0800
0830
0814
0808
0855
0900
0900
0900
0900
7.4
3.9
3.9
12.0
12.0
24.0
24.0
24.0
Z4.0
24. 0
24.0
26. 3
26. 3
23.7
24. 0
23.9
23. 3
23.6
24.0
24. 1
24. 1
24.0
24.0
Collection
5*™pl* Col-
Volume
(m3) LeCt0t
153
81
81
242
242
472
485
497
497
485
485
518
518
503
497
507
459
501
449
437
437
411
411
P
P
C
P
C
P
P
P
P
P
C
P
C
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
C
P
C
Beta
Activity
(PCi/m3)
0. 19
2, 200
140
1.8
0. 37
1.0
0.48
1. 5
0. 13
96
0. 33
87
1. 3
0.09
33
0.66
0.09
Beta
Exposure
(pCi-hr/m3)
1.4
9,000
1,700
43
8.9
24
12
36
3.4
230
8
2, 100
30
2. 1
790
16
2. 2
i
pCi/m3
1, 100
53
11
7. 1
0. 56
ND
ND
ND
0.25
ND
ND
ND
8.6
ND
4. 1
ND
ND
1. 2
ND
ND
ND
ND
31 j 132
pCi-hr/m3 pCi/m3
4, 300
200
130
85
13
ND
ND
ND
6
ND
ND
ND
200
ND
100
ND
ND
29
ND
ND
ND
ND
200
40
24
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
2Z
ND
11
ND
ND
3.4
ND
ND
ND
ND
Results
Te-I 133I
pCi-hr/m3 pCi/m3 pCi-hr/m3
NGS'
800
160
290
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
520
ND
260
ND
ND
82
ND
ND
ND
ND
350
250
21
23
1.09
ND
ND
.ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
38
ND
17
ND
ND
5.6
ND
ND
ND
ND
1,400
970
250
280
26
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
900
ND
410
ND
ND
130
ND
ND
ND
ND
13
pCi/m3
ND
600
63
25
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
pCi-hr/m3
ND
2, 300
760
300
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
-------
Appendix I. Additional Air Sampling Results, April, 1966 (continued)
Collection
Location
Salt Lake City,
Utah
Sampling Period Total Sample
Start Stop Time Volume
Day Hr Day Hr (Hr) (.m3)
25 0840 26 0840 24.0 472
26 0840 27 0840 24.0 497
27 0840 28 0845 Z4. 0 497
Col-
P
P
P
Beta
Activity
(pCi/m3)
1.7
0.01
0.08
Beta
Exposure
(pCi-hr/m3)
41
2. 3
1.8
131!
pCi/m3 pCi-hr/m3
ND ND
0.38 9.1
ND ND
132
pCi/m3
ND
ND
ND
Results
Te-I
pCi-hr/m3
ND
ND
ND
13
pCi/m3
ND
1.0
ND
3I
pCi-hr/m3
ND
24
ND
135
pCi/m3
ND
ND
ND
I
pCi-hr/m3
ND
ND
ND
Notes: NGS* - Not gamma scanned. ND - Not detected. P = Prefilter C = Charcoal cartridge
-------
Appendix II. Complete Water Sampling Data
Samples designated as "Tap" indicate water taken from taps in a
dwelling place regardless of the source of the water. Those
designated "Spring" were collected at the spring regardless of the
subsequent use of the water. Samples labeled "Tank" were taken
from a stock tank or trough, and were not used for human con-
sumption with one important exception. The domestic tap supply
at the Davis Ranch near Hiko, Nevada, consisted of a pipe
connected directly to the stock tank.
Additional samples were collected at the L. Lee Dairy at Alamo,
and the Schofield Dairy at Hiko. These samples were collected
as part of a special research project conducted by the Bioenviron-
mental Research program and were reported separately in the
final report on Pin Stripe by this program (SWRHL-41r).
42
-------
Appendix II. Complete Water Sampling Data
T c Date Gross Gross
Location Source _ ,_ , »-. i r, 131T 132 133_ 135T
Collected Alpha Beta I Te-I I I
pCi/1
23 miles south of
Pipe Spgs. Nat'l Monument
Arizona
Fredonia, Arizona
1/2 mile west
15 miles west of
Pipe Spgs. Nat'l Monument
Arizona
Jacob Lake,
Arizona
Moccasin Indian School
Moccasin, Arizona
Kaibab Nat'l Forest Camp
Mt. Trumbull, Ariz.
Mt. Trumbull,
Arizona
Kanab, Utah
Jackson Reservoir
Orderville Ranch
Chamberlain, Utah
Butler Ranch, Nevada
31 mi. S Alamo
Alamo, Nevada
Frehner Dairy
Tank
Pond
Spring
Pond
Pond
Pond
Tank
Lake
Tank
Pond
Tank
Tank
Tank
Tank
Tank
Tank
Tank
Tank
Tank
Tank
5/02/66 1.7
5/01/66 5.8
4/30/66 1.4
5/01/66 2.1
4/30/66 <0. 1
5/02/66 0.6
5/02/66 0.3
5/01/66 <0. 1
5/01/66 <0. 1
0.7
4/26/66 1.1
4/27/66 <0. 1
4/28/66 <0.1
4/29/66 0.7
4/30/66 <0.1
5/01/66 2.8
5/02/66 <0.1
5/07/66 2.5
5/10/66 1.4
5/13/66 <0.1
29
24
< 1
20
< 1
6
131
25
27 8.0
41 110
32 90
11
17
21
21
12
23
25
30
60 40
43
-------
Appendix II. Complete Water Sampling Data (continued)
Location
Alamo, Nevada
L. Lee Dairy
Alamo, Nevada
Mann Ranch
Alamo, Nevada
A. Sharp Ranch
Alamo, Nevada
Leo Stewart Dairy
Source
Tank
Tank
Tank
Tank
Tap
Tank
Tank
Tank
Tank
Tank
Tank
Tank
Tank
Tank
Tank
Tank
Tank
Tank
Tank
Tank
Tank
Tank
Tank
Tank
Tank
Tank
Tank
Date
Collected
4/26/66
5/01/66
5/02/66
4/26/66
4/27/66
4/28/66
4/29/66
4/30/66
5/01/66
5/02/66
5/05/66
5/06/66
5/07/66
5/08/66
5/09/66
5/10/66
4/25/66
4/26/66
4/27/66
4/28/66
4/29/66
4/30/66
5/01/66
5/02/66
5/07/66
5/10/66
5/13/66
Gross
Alpha
1.4
1. 7
<0. 1
<0. 1
0.3
0.3
0. 7
0.3
<0. 1
1.7
1.7
0.6
1.7
<0. 1
1.4
5.5
NGA
1.5
0.3
1.7
1.4
<0. 1
<0. 1
<0. 1
1. 1
1. 1
<0. 1
pCi/1
38 80 30 80
39
42
54 200 50 60 120
32
19 120
14
10
12
12
17
12
13
16 110
24
32
NGB 280 250 410
28 130
19
29
25
13
16
28
19
31
35
Pahranagat Lake,
Nevada
Alamo, Nevada
M. K. Stewart
Lake 4/27/66 6.5
Tank 4/26/66 1.1
34
96 220 130
130 160
NGA - no gross alpha
NGB - no gross beta
44
-------
Appendix II. Complete Water Sampling Data (continued)
Location
Alamo, Nevada
M. K. Stewart
Alamo, Nevada
Wright Dairy
Ash Springs
Nevada
Caliente, Nevada
1 mile north
Caliente, Nevada
4 miles north
Caliente, Nevada
3 miles north on
Beaver Dam Road
Caliente, Nevada
Raymond Ranch
Caliente, Nevada
Oxborrow Ranch
Source
Tank
Tank
Tank
Tank
Tank
Tank
Tank
Tank
Tank
Tank
Tank
Tank
Tank
Tank
Tank
Stream
Spring
Pond
Spring
Pond
Pond
Pond
Pond
Tap
Tap
Tap
Date
Collected
4/27/66
4/28/66
4/29/66
4/30/66
5/01/66
5/02/66
5/10/66
5/13/66
4/26/66
4/27/66
4/28/66
4/29/66
4/30/66
5/01/66
5/02/66
4/25/66
4/27/66
5/01/66
5/01/66
4/30/66
5/02/66
5/03/66
5/06/66
4/30/66
5/03/66
5/06/66
Gross
Alpha
0.6
1. 1
<0. 1
0.6
0.6
<0. 1
1.4
<0. 1
1.4
0.3
1. 1
1. 3
3.9
1. 1
<0. 1
NGA
1.4
5.0
2.8
0.6
1. 1
1.4
1.4
1. 7
0.3
1. 1
ter 131I 132Te-I 133I 135I
pCi/1
27
26
13
23
13
13
19
25
36 200 70 80 130
25
15
14
17
6
6
NGB 230 330 480 440
26
19
13
10
16
13
10
7
4
5
NGA - no gross alpha
NGB - no gross beta
45
-------
Appendix II. Complete Water Sampling Data (continued)
Date Gross Gross ,_ ,__ _„_
Location Source _ „ , A1 , _ 131 132^ 13-3_ 135T
Collected Alpha Beta I Te-I I I
Caliente, Nevada
Mathew's Ranch
Caliente, Nevada
Charlton Ranch
Caliente, Nevada
Tennille Ranch
Caliente, Nevada
Young Ranch
Diablo, Nevada
Elgin, Nevada
Ballow Ranch
Hiko, Nevada
Hiko pond
Hiko, Nevada
Fish & Game Dept.
Spring
Tap
4/28/66 <0. 1
5/10/66 0.3
Pond 4/27/66 5.8
Pond 4/28/66 1.7
pCi/1
< 1
Spring
Spring
Tap
Tap
Tap
Tap
Tap
Tap
Tap
Spring
Spring
Stream
Spring
Spring
Spring
Spring
Spring
4/27/66
4/28/66
4/29/66
4/30/66
5/01/66
5/02/66
5/02/66
5/03/66
5/06/66
4/26/66
4/27/66
4/27/66
4/28/66
4/29/66
4/30/66
5/01/66
5/03/66
1.4
4.4
0.7
2.2
0.3
2.8
13
8.3
1.7
1.7
2.5
0.6
6.9
1. 1
1. 1
4. 7
2.8
16
8
8
9
11
6
32
36
7
17
16
8
20
10
17
10
9
Stream
Spring
Stream
Spring
Stream
Spring
Tap
4/29/66
4/29/66
4/30/66
4/30/66
5/01/66
5/01/66
5/02/66
0.3
3.3
1. 7
1. 7
0. 3
3.6
1. 1
8
10
12
2
7
12
3
92
70
110
23 60
46
-------
Appendix II. Complete Water Sampling Data (continued)
Location
Hiko, Nevada
Crystal Springs
Hiko, Nevada
Davis Ranch
*
Hiko, Nevada
Schofield Dairy
Panaca, Nevada
C & G Ranch
Panaca, Nevada
E. Deck Ranch
Source
Spring
Tap
Tap
Tap
Tap
Tap
Tap
Tap
Tap
Tap
Tap
Tap
Tap
Tap
Tap
Tap
Tank
Tank
Tank
Tap
Spring
Spring
Spring
Spring
Spring
Tap
Tap
Spring
Spring
Spring
Spring
Tank
Date
Collected
4/27/66
4/26/66
4/27/66
4/28/66
4/29/66
4/30/66
5/01/66
5/02/66
5/03/66
5/04/66
5/05/66
5/06/66
5/07/66
5/08/66
5/09/66
5/13/66
4/25/66
4/26/66
4/27/66
4/27/66
4/27/66
4/28/66
4/29/66
4/30/66
5/01/66
5/02/66
4/26/66
4/27/66
4/28/66
4/29/66
4/30/66
5/11/66
Gross
Alpha
<0. 1
1.4
<0. 1
2.5
5.0
3.3
3.6
4. 7
3. 3
3.3
3.9
3.6
2.8
2.5
3.9
<0. 1
NGA
6.9
3.6
4.4
1.4
4.4
0. 3
0.3
0.3
2.8
<0. 1
<0. 1
0.3
0.7
<0. 1
0. 3
Gr°SS 131 132 T 133 135
Beta I Te-I I I
pCi/1
10
151 3860 80 270
35 50 30 60
19 30
29
8 40
14
11
10
17
8
13
16
14
12
11
NGB 500 820 1100 940
136
79 140
30
16
8 70
18
12
4
8
8
9
9
20
25
21
47
NGA - no gross alpha
NGB - no gross beta
-------
Appendix II. Complete Water Sampling Data (continued)
Location
Panaca, Nevada
K. Lee Ranch
Pioche, Nevada
Delmue Ranch
Pioche, Nevada
Rose Valley Ranch
Pioche, Nevada
Horlacher Ranch
Pioche, Nevada
County Courthouse
Sunnyside, Nevada
Adams-McGill Res
Ursine, Nevada
Meadow Valley Res
Ursine, Nevada
3. 9 miles north of
Meadow Valley Res
Ursine, Nevada
1/4 mile west
Source
Tank
Tap
Tap
Tap
Stream
Stream
Stream
Stream
Stream
Stream
Stream
Stream
Stream
Stream
Tap
Tap
Tap
Lake
Lak
Stream
Stream
Stream
Stream
Date
Collected
4/26/66
5/02/66
5/03/66
5/06/66
4/27/66
4/28/66
4/29/66
4/30/66
5/01/66
4/26/66
4/27/66
4/29/66
4/30/66
5/01/66
5/03/66
4/26/66
4/27/66
5/05/66
4/30/66
4/30/66
4/29/66
4/30/66
5/01/66
Gross
Alpha
0.6
2.2
2.8
1. 7
1.4
1.4
2.5
3.3
1. 7
2.8
5.8
3.9
0.9
0.6
<0. 1
1.4
1. 7
1.7
2.5
4.4
1.4
2.8
CLr°8S 131 132^ T 133T 135T
Beta I Te-I I I
pCi/1
36
2
7
8
20
14
19
11
13
15
15
17
21
2
7
20
18
11
17
10
12
14
Ursine, Nevada
6. 8 miles northeast
Stream 5/01/66 1.1
16
48
-------
Appendix II. Complete Water Sampling Data (continued)
Location
Ursine, Nevada
7 miles north
Ursine, Nevada
13 miles north in
Eagle Valley
Ursine, Nevada
16 miles north in
Eagle Valley
Ursine, Nevada
Eagle Valley Lake
Ursine, Nevada
Eagle Valley Creek
Ursine, Nevada
Donahue Ranch
Ursine, Nevada
Lytle Ranch
Source
Stream
Stream
Tank
Tank
Tank
Lake
Lake
Lake
Stream
Stream
Stream
Stream
Tank
Tank
Tank
Tank
Stream
Stream
Tank
Tank
Tank
Tank
Tank
Tank
Tank
Tank
Date
Collected
4/26/66
4/29/66
4/29/66
4/29/66
5/01/66
4/27/66
4/28/66
4/29/66
4/27/66
4/28/66
4/28/66
4/28/66
4/28/66
4/29/66
5/01/66
5/02/66
5/03/66
5/06/66
4/26/66
4/27/66
4/28/66
4/29/66
4/30/66
5/01/66
5/02/66
5/03/66
Gross
Alpha
<0. 1
<0. 1
1. 1
1.4
1. 1
<0. 1
3.9
3.3
4.5
<0. 1
0. 6
0.6
4. 7
2.2
0. 8
1. 1
6. 1
3.6
<0. 1
1.4
2.2
<0. 1
2.2
2.3
2.2
1.7
ross 132m T 133T 135T
Beta I Te-I I I
23 60 70 120
14
15
42
14
42
13
15
20
<1. 0
13
19
60
4
8
5
21
5
23 280 90 90 40
10
15
10
14
16
5
6
Ursine, Nevada
McCrosky Ranch
Tap
5/02/66 <0. 1
49
-------
Appendix III. Vegetation Sampling Data
Samples designated as "hay", "pasture", "green chop", or "silage"
were collected to be representative of dairy cattle feed at milk
sampling locations. Hay, as listed in the Appendix, is dry vegeta-
tion in storage which may or may not have been covered during
cloud passage. "Natural" refers to any naturally growing or native
vegetation which was not being used as dairy cattle feed.
50
-------
Appendix III. Vegetation Sampling Data
, .. Date
Location
Collected
Alamo, Nevada
Frehner Dairy 4/26
4/27
4/28
4/29,30
5/01
5/02
5/6,7,8,9
5/10, 13
L. Lee Dairy 4/26
4/27,29,30
4/28
4/29,30
5/1,3,5,8
5/2,3,6,7
5/9, 10, 11, 12
5/13
5/1,6,7,8,9
5/10, 11, 12, 13
4/26,28,29,30
4/27,30
5/2,3,4,5
5/7,9, 11, 12
5/6, 7,8, 10, 13
4/26,27
4/28,29,30
5/1,2,3,4
5/5,6,7,8
5/9,11, 13,25
Mann Ranch 5/1,2
Sharp Ranch 4/26, 27, 28, 28, 30
4/26
5/1-10
Leo Stewart 4/25,26
4/27
4/28
4/29,30
No. of _ Fresh fission
Type
Samples Products
1
1
1
2
1
1
6
2
4
1
2
4
4
4
1
5
7
4
2
8
4
6
36
4
11
8
4
2
5
1
10
2
1
1
2
Silage
Hay
Silage
Silage
Hay
Silage
Green chop
Green chop
Grain
Grain
Grain
Grain
Grain
Grain
Grain
Fresh alfalfa
Fresh alfalfa
Hay
Hay
Hay
Hay
Hay
Green Chop
Green Chop
Green Chop
Green Chop
Green Chop
Hay
Pasture
Hay
Pasture
Hay
Hay
Green Chop
Hay
P
ND
ND
P
ND
P
P
P
ND
P
P
ND
ND
P
P
P
P
ND
P
P
ND
P
P
P
P
P
ND
P
P
P
P
ND
P
P
P -positive
ND-not detectable
51
-------
Appendix III. Vegetation Sampling Data (continued)
Location
Alamo, Nevada(continued)
Date
Collected
No. of
Samples
Type
Fresh fission
Products
Leo Stewart (continued)
5/6
M. K. Stewart Dairy
Wright Dairy
Highway 93 at Alamo
5 mi S of Alamo
10 mi S of Alamo
15 mi S of Alamo
20 mi S of Alamo
25 mi S of Alamo
29. 5 mi S of Alamo
5/1,2
,7,8,10,13
4/25
4/26,27,28
4/29,30
5/1,2
5/10, 13
4/26
4/27
4/28,29,30
5/1,2
4/28
4/28
4/28
4/28
4/28
4/28
4/28
2
5
1
3
2
2
2
1
1
3
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Hay
Green Chop
Hay
Green Chop
Silage
Silage
Green Chop
Silage
Hay
Hay
Hay
Natural
Natural
Natural
Natural
Natural
Natural
Natural
ND
P
P
P
ND
ND
P
P
P
ND
ND
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
(Butler Ranch turnoff)
Caliente, Nevada
Charlton Ranch
L. Mathews Ranch
Oxborrow Ranch
Raymond Ranch
Tennille Ranch
4/27,28,29
4/28,29,30
4/28
4/29,30
5/1
5/1
4/30 & 5/1
4/30 &5/1
5/2,3
4/30
5/1
3
3
1
2
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
Green Chop
Pasture
Green Chop
Hay
Pasture
Hay
Hay
Pasture
Hay
Pasture
Pasture
ND
P
P
ND
P
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
P
P -positive
ND-not detectable
52
-------
Appendix III. Vegetation Sampling Data(continued)
Location
Date
Collected
No. of
Samples
Type
Fresh fission
Products
Caliente, Nevada(continued)
Young Ranch
4/26
4/27,30
4/26,27,29,30
4/28
4/29
5/1
5/1
1
2
4
1
1
1
1
Hay
Hay
Pasture
Natural
Green Chop
Hay
Pasture
P
ND
P
P
ND
ND
P
Highway 93 at Caliente 4/28,29
1 mi N of Caliente
4 mi N of Caliente
5 mi N of Caliente
5 mi N of Caliente
5 mi N of Caliente
7 mi N of Caliente
10 mi N of Caliente
10 mi N of Caliente
13 mi N of Caliente
15 mi N of Caliente
15 mi N of Caliente
16 mi N of Caliente
19 mi N of Caliente
22 mi N of Caliente
Elgin, Nevada
Blue Ranch
and 30
5/1
4/26,27
4/26,27
4/28,29
4/30
5/1
4/26,27
4/26,27,28
29, and 30
5/1
4/27
4/28,29,30
5/1
4/26,27
4/26,27
4/26,27
4/29
4/30 & 5/1
Highway 93, Glendale, Nev. 4/30
5 mi N of Glendale
10 mi N of Glendale
15 mi N of Glendale
20 mi N of Glendale
25 mi N of Glendale
30 mi N of Glendale
4/30
4/30
4/30
4/30
4/30
4/30
3
1
2
2
2
1
1
2
5
1
1
3
1
2
2
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Natural
Natural
Natural
Natural
Natural
Natural
Natural
Natural
Natural
Natural
Natural
Natural
Natural
Natural
Natural
Natural
Green Chop
Hay
Natural
Natural
Natural
Natural
Natural
Natural
Natural
P
P
P
P
P
ND
P
P
P
ND
P
P
P
P
P
P
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
P
ND
P
P
(Butler Ranch turnoff)
P -positive
ND-not detectable
53
-------
Appendix III. Vegetation Sampling Data (continued)
T .. Date
Location
Collected
Hiko, Nevada
Davis Ranch 4/26-30
5/1-7
5/8,9,13,25
Schofield Dairy 4/25
4/26-29
4/30
4/30 & 5/1
5/1
5/2-6
5/6&7
5/7-10
5/11,12/13
4/26,28,29,30
5/1-6
5/7-11
5/12 &5/13
5/13
4/26,28,29,30
4/27
5/1,2,5,6,7
5/3,4
5/8,9,12
5/10, 11, 13
4/25-27
4/28-30
5/1-4
5/5-8
5/9-12
5/13, 16, 19,25
Coyote Summit, 30 mi W of
Jet. US 93 &25 on Hway 25 4/26
25 mi W Jet. 93 & 25 on
Hway 25 4/26
20 mi W Jct.93 &25 on
Hway 25 4/26
No. of _ Fresh fission
Type
Samples Products
5
7
4
1
6
1
2
1
9
2
5
3
5
11
10
4
1
4
2
5
2
3
3
32
6
8
8
5
4
1
1
1
Pasture
Pasture
Pasture
Pasture
Hay
Hay
Hay
Hay
Hay
Hay
Hay
Hay
Fresh alfalfa
Fresh alfalfa
Fresh alfalfa
Fresh alfalfa
Fresh alfalfa
Grain
Grain
Grain
Grain
Grain
Grain
Green Chop
Green Chop
Green Chop
Green Chop
Green Chop
Green Chop
Natural
Natural
Natural
P
P
P
P
P
ND
P
ND
P
ND
P
P
P
P
P
P
ND
ND
P
P
ND
ND
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
ND
P
P
P -positive
ND-not detectable
54
-------
Appendix III. Vegetation Sampling Data (continued)
Location
Hancock Summit, 15 mi W
Jet. 93 & 25 on Hway 25
10 mi W Jet. 93 & 25 on
Hway 25
5 mi W Jet 93 & 25 on
Hway 25
Jet. of US 93 & Hway 25,
Hiko, Nevada
5 mi E Jet 93 & 25 on
US 93
10 mi E Jet 93 & 25 on
US 93
15 mi E Jet 93 & 25 on
US 93
20 mi E Jet 93 & 25 on
US 93
Delamar Jet. , 25 mi E of
Jet 93 & 25 on US 93
30 mi E Jet 93 & 25
on US 93
35 mi E Jet 93 & 25
on US 93
40 mi E Jet 93 & 25
on US 93
Panaca, Nevada
C & G Ranch
4/29,
E. Deck Ranch
Date
Collected
4/26
4/26
4/26
4/26
4/26
4/26
4/26
4/26
4/26
4/26
4/26
4/26
4/27,28
30&5/1
4/26
4/26
4/27
4/27,29,30
4/29,30
4/30
5/1
No. of
Samples
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
3
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
Type
Natural
Natural
Natural
Natural
Natural
Natural
Natural
Natural
Natural
Natural
Natural
Natural
Green Chop
Hay
Hay
Green Chop
Grass
Hay
Grass
Pasture
Grass
Fresh fission
Products
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
ND
ND
P
P
P
ND
ND
P
ND
P -positive
ND-not detectable
55
-------
Appendix III. Vegetation Sampling Data (continued)
Location
NW side of Panaca
Panaca, 5 mi N on
Delmue Ranch
5 mi N of Panaca on
US 93
5 mi N of Panaca on
US 93
5 mi E of Panaca on
Hway 25
5 mi E of Panaca on
Hway 25
10 mi E of Panaca on
Date
Collected
4/27
4/30&5/1
4/30
5/1
4/27,28,30
4/29&5/1
Hway 25 4/27,29 &5/1
10 mi E of Panaca on
Hway 25
15 mi E of Panaca on
Hway 25
Pioche, Nevada
Delmue Ranch
Horlacher Ranch
Rose Valley Ranch
5 mi N or Pioche on
US 93
10 mi N of Pioche on
US 93
15 mi N of Pioche on
US 93
20 mi N of Pioche on
US 93
4/28,30
4/28,29
4/27, 30
4/27,29
4/28 &5/1
5/1
4/27-30
4/27-30
5/1
5/1
4/26,27
4/26
4/27,28,29
4/27,28
4/27,28
4/28
4/28
No. of
Samples
1
2
1
1
3
2
3
2
2
2
2
3
1
4
4
1
1
2
1
4
2
2
1
1
Type
Natural
Natural
Natural
Natural
Natural
Natural
Natural
Natural
Natural
Hay
Pasture
Natural
Hay
Natural
Hay
Natural
Hay
Hay
Pasture
Natural
Natural
Natural
Natural
Natural
Fresh fission
Products
P
P
P
P
ND
P
P
ND
ND
P
P
P
ND
P
ND
P
ND
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P -positive
ND-not detectable
56
-------
Appendix III. Vegetation Sampling Data (continued)
Date
Location
Collected
25 mi N of Pioche on
US 93
30 mi N of Pioche on
US 93
35 mi N of Pioche on
US 93
40 mi N of Pioche on
US 93
45 mi N of Pioche on
US 93
50 mi N of Pioche on
US 93
55 mi N of Pioche on
US 93
Delmue Ranch road,
Pioche
2 mi S of Delmue Ranch
Pioche
5 mi S of Delmue Ranch
Pioche 4/28
5 mi N of Delmue Ranch
Pioche 4/29
10 mi N of Delmue Rn. ,
Pioche 4/29
3. 5 mi E of Pioche
5 mi E of Pioche 4/29, 30
10 mi E of Pioche 4/29, 30
Ursine, Nevada
Burnt Cabin Ranch
Donahue Ranch
5/2,3,5
Lytle Ranch
4/28
4/28
4/28
4/28
4/28
4/28
4/28
4/29
4/27
&5/1
&5/1
&5/1
5/1
&5/1
&5/1
5/1
4/28
4/29
,6,10
5/4
4/26
4/27-30
5/1
No. of
Type
Samples
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
3
3
1
1
1
5
1
1
4
1
Natural
Natural
Natural
Natural
Natural
Natural
Natural
Natural
Natural
Natural
Natural
Natural
Natural
Natural
Natural
Natural
Pasture
Hay
Pasture
Pasture
Pasture
Hay
Hay
Fresh fission
Products
P
P
P
P
ND
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
ND
P
ND
ND
P -positive
ND-not detectable
57
-------
Appendix III. Vegetation Sampling Data (continued)
Date
Location
Collected
1/4 mi W of Ursine 4/28, 29, 30
1/4 mi W of Ursine
5 mi W of Ursine
10 mi W of Ursine
5/1
4/28
4/28
5 mi N of Ursine 4/27-30
5 mi N of Ursine
6. 5 mi N of Ursine
7. 0 mi N of Ursine
8. 5 mi N of Ursine
10 mi N of Ursine 4/28,29
15 mi N of Ursine 4/29
20 mi N of Ursine 4/29
Meadow Valley Reservoir
Ursine
1/2 mi W of Fredonia,
Arizona
8 mi W of Fredonia, Ariz.
Moccasin, Arizona
Mt. Trumbull, Arizona
16 mi E of Mt. Trumbull
Pipe Springs National Monu-
ment, Arizona
5 mi S of Pipe Springs
Matheson Dairy, Cedar City,
Utah
Gonders Ranch, Garrison,
Utah
Airport, Kanab, Utah
2 mi S of Mt. Carmel Jet. ,
Utah
R. Cox Dairy
St. George, Utah
5/1
4/27
4/26
4/27
&5/1
&5/1
&5/1
4/30
5/1
5/1
4/30
5/2
5/2
4/30
5/2
4/27
4/27
5/4
5/4
5/1
5/1
4/27
4/27
4/27
No. of
Samples
3
1
1
1
4
1
1
1
1
3
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Type
Natural
Natural
Natural
Natural
Natural
Natural
Natural
Natural
Natural
Natural
Natural
Natural
Natural
Natural
Natural
Natural
Natural
Natural
Natural
Natural
Silage
Hay
Hay
Natural
Natural
Natural
Pasture
Silage
Hay
Fresh fission
Products
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
P
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
P -positive
ND-not detectable
58
-------
Appendix IV. Complete Milk Sampling Data
Date of
Location .
Milking
Alamo, Nevada
Frehner Dairy 4/25
4/26
4/26
4/27
4/27
4/28
4/29
4/29
4/30
4/30
5/01
5/01
5/02
5/02
5/03
5/03
5/04
5/04
5/05
5/05
5/06
5/06
5/07
5/07
5/08
5/08
5/09
5/09
5/10
5/11
5/12
5/13
L. Lee Dairy 4/25
4/26
4/26
4/27
4/27
Time
of Day
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
AM
AM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
131I
ND
50
50
30
40
ND
50
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
50
30
50
ND
50
50
ND
60
60
ND
ND
ND
90
600
600
1100
980
133i
80
390
430
190
110
ND
40
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND •
ND
ND
ND
280
340
1900
3600
2500
pCi/1
137
Cs
30
30
ND
30
25
ND
30
20
30
20
15
15
ND
ND
ND
40
35
25
20
15
10
20
20
20
20
10
10
20
25
ND
ND
15
50
65
ND
ND
ND
89C 90
Sr Sr
ND 5
ND 5
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
ND 5
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
ND 2
ND 5
no chem
no chem
ND 5
ND 5
59
-------
Appendix IV. Complete Milk Sampling Data (continued)
Date of
Location .
Milking
Alamo, Nevada
L. Lee Dairy 4/28
(continued) 4/28
4/29
4/29
4/30
4/30
5/01
5/01
5/02
5/02
5/03
5/03
5/04
5/04
5/05
5/05
5/06
5/06
5/07
5/07
5/08
5/08
5/09
5/25
6/07
6/13
6/17
6/20
7/07
7/14
7/22
7/27
8/03
Mann Ranch 4/30
5/01
5/01
5/02
5/02
Time
of Day
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
PM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
131i
800
1400
800
760
440
530
630
610
460
520
450
450
300
340
290
260
200
220
200
220
130
150
210
60
20
NA*
ND
20
NA
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
133x
1400
1700
730
540
260
210
190
150
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NA
ND
ND
NA-
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
pCi/1
137_
Cs
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
60
65
35
40
55
60
60
55
55
50
50
45
40
40
45
15
15
NA
ND
20
20
25
10
10
10
ND
30
20
30
ND
89C 90_
Sr Sr
ND 6
ND 6
ND 6
ND 6
ND 4
ND 4
ND 5
ND 5
ND 7
ND 7
ND 6
ND 6
ND 5
ND 5
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
ND 8
5 4
5 5
15 2
ND 5
ND 3
NA NA
5 1
ND 4
ND 3
ND 2
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
60
-------
Appendix IV. Complete Milk Sampling Data(continued)
Location
Alamo, Nevada
Mann Ranch
(continued)
Sharp Ranch
Leo Stewart Dairy
Date of
Milking
5/03
5/03
5/04
5/04
5/05
4/26
4/26
4/27
4/27
4/28
4/28
4/29
4/30
4/30
5/01
5/01
5/02
5/03
5/04
5/05
5/05
5/06
5/07
5/08
5/09
5/10
5/11
5/12
5/13
5/25
4/25
4/26
4/26
4/27
4/27
4/28
4/28
Time
of Day
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
AM
AM
AM
PM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
131I
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1600
1000
2000
840
2100
570
1800
1300
1500
1200
780
800
570
520
430
270
250
190
190
120
ND
ND
60
80
50
70
60
50
270
40
190
220
133i
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
7300
5500
7800
2400
5100
840
1800
650
480
320
180
110
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
240
280
400
850
110
400
270
pCi/1
137
Cs
35
20
20
25
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
45
ND
90
110
160
80
80
30
60
65
50
70
30
40
20
25
20
25
30
20
40
45
25
45
25
ND
25
89C 90
Sr Sr
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
ND 5
no chem
no chem
no chem
5 3
5 3
no chem
no chem
5 3
no chem
no chem
5 5
5 4
5 4
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
ND 5
ND 5
ND 6
ND 7
25 5
ND 6
no chem
no chem
ND 6
no chem
ND 8
no chem
61
-------
Appendix IV. Complete Milk Sampling Data(continued)
Date of
Location .
Milking
Alamo, Nevada
Leo Stewart Dairy 4/29
(continued) 4/29
4/30
4/30
5/01
5/02
5/02
5/03
5/03
5/04
5/04
5/05
5/05
5/06
5/06
5/07
5/07
5/08
5/08
5/09
5/09
5/10
5/11
5/12
5/13
M. K. Stewart Dairy 4/25
4/26
4/26
4/27
4/27
4/28
4/28
4/29
4/29
4/30
4/30
5/01
5/01
Time
of Day
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
AM
AM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
131I
100
60
60
30
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
130
100
90
ND
20
40
160
100
110
70
ND
ND
20
ND
ND
ND
ND
30
ND
170
280
340
590
500
300
190
150
80
ND
133,
100
40
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
90
130
60
630
870
610
770
470
ND
100
70
20
ND
pCi/1
137
Cs
45
35
. 40
50
30
35
ND
35
40
50
35
35
45
40
50
55
15
30
35
15
20
30
25
20
40
35
15
ND
50
40
ND
ND
45
50
75
ND
45
35
89 90
Sr Sr
no chem
no chem
ND 7
ND 7
no chem
no chem
no chem
ND 7
no chem
no chem
no chem
ND 4
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
ND 9
ND 9
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
ND 4
ND 4
no chem
no chem
62
-------
Appendix IV. Complete Milk Sampling Data(continued)
Date of
Location .
Milking
Alamo, Nevada
M. K. Stewart Dairy 5/02
(continued) 5/02
5/03
5/03
5/04
5/04
5/05
5/05
5/06
5/06
5/07
5/07
5/08
5/08
5/09
5/09
5/10
5/11
5/12
5/13
Wright Dairy 4/25
4/26
4/26
4/27
4/27
4/28
4/28
v 4/29
4/29
4/30
4/30
5/01
5/01
5/02
5/03
5/04
Time
of Day
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
AM
AM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
131I
ND
30
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
30
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
80
40
ND
50
30
ND
ND
ND
30
NO-
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
20
ND
ND
133i
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
100
330
170
110
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
pCi/1
13?Cs
50
30
30
50
ND
ND
ND
35
20
30
35
15
15
25
15
10
20
25
20
15
10
45
20
20
ND
10
15
35
25
25
ND
ND
15
30
10
ND
890 900
Sr Sr
no chem
no chem
no chem
ND 3
no chem
no chem
ND 3
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
ND 4
ND 3
ND 3
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
ND 3
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
63
-------
Appendix IV. Complete Milk Sampling Data (continued)
Date of
Location .
Milking
Caliente, Nevada
Charlton Ranch 4/28
4/29
4/30
5/01
5/04
5/06
Oxborrow Ranch 4/30
5/01
5/03
5/05
5/07
5/09
Raymond Ranch 4/30
5/01
5/02
5/03
5/04
5/08
5/10
Tennille Ranch 4/29
4/30
5/01
5/03
5/04
5/06
5/08
5/10
Young Ranch 4/25
4/27
4/28
4/29
4/30
5/03
5/05
5/07
5/10
Time
of Day
PM
AM & PM
AM & PM
PM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
PM
PM
PM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM.
PM
AM
AM
PM
PM
AM
AM
AM
AM
131I
130
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
100
ND
70
50
ND
ND
ND
40
ND
50
ND
20
ND
ND
ND
ND
30
30
ND
30
ND
ND
ND
ND
133
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
500
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
20
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
90
70
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
pCi/1
137^
Cs
85
10
15
25
20
10
25
25
ND
ND
30
15
ND
40
15
35
ND
15
15
15
ND
45
ND
10
15
15
15
25
30
30
ND
15
ND
ND
25
15
89C 90
Sr Sr
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
ND 4
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
ND 10
ND 3
ND 5
no chem
no chem
ND 3
no chem
no chem ,
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem.
ND 4
no chem
no chem
no chem
64
-------
Appendix IV. Complete Milk Sampling Data (continued)
Location
Elgin, Nevada
Blue Ranch
Hiko, Nevada
Davis Ranch
Schofield Dairy
Date of
Milking
4/28
4/29
4/30
5/01
5/04
4/26
4/27
4/28
4/29
4/30
5/01
5/02
5/03
5/04
5/05
5/06
5/07
5/08
5/09
5/10
5/11
5/12
5/25
6/07
6/14
6/20
6/29
7/05
7/12
7/18
7/26
4/25
4/26
4/26
4/27
Time
of Day
PM
PM
PM
PM
AM
PM
PM
PM
PM
PM
PM
PM
PM
PM
PM
PM
PM
PM
PM
PM
PM
PM
PM
PM
AM
PM
AM
AM
NA
NA
PM
PM
AM
PM'
AM
131I
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1800
3500
2900
2000
2200
1700
3000
2300
1800
970
700
510
350
240
240
130
130
80
ND
ND
ND
NA
NA
NA
70
ND
320
1900
3300
4400
133i
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
7100
7800
3500
1200
1100
620
650
570
260
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NA
NA
NA
ND
ND
1000
6100
20, 000
15,000
pCi/1
13?Cs
35
40
40
55
55
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
45
75
60
80
45
ND
ND
10
NA
30
30
25
25
ND
ND
ND
ND
89C 90Q
Sr Sr
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
5 3
no chem
15 4
20 4
no chem
no chem
no chem
50 7
35 5
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
20 5
15 7
10 6
10 5
5
15 2
20 8
15 6
10 5
5 3
5 3
NA NA
ND 4
ND 4
5 4
5 4
10 3
65
-------
Appendix IV. Complete Milk Sampling Data(continued)
Date of
Location .
Milking
Schofield Dairy 4/27
(continued) 4/28
4/28
4/29
4/29
4/30
4/30
5/01
5/01
5/02
5/02
5/03
5/03
5/04
5/04
5/05
5/05
5/06
5/06
5/07
5/07
5/08
5/08
5/13
Las Vegas, Nevada
Anderson Dairy #1 4/26
(Milk from Hidden 4/28
Valley, Nevada) 4/29
4/30
Anderson Dairy #2 4/26
(Milk from St. George, 4/28
Utah) 4/29
5/01
5/03
5/05
5/07
5/09
Time
of Day
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
PM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
PM
PM
PM
PM
PM
4800
4000
3700
1500
1000
500
450
250
140
130
100
80
70
ND
30
ND
40
40
60
30
ND
50
40
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
[ I
12,000
6,700
4,700
1,400
730
290
150
70
40
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
pCi/1
137^
Cs
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
160
ND
30
40
60
30
30
20
15
30
25
30
35
25
35
20
25
25
20
25
25
ND
10
ND
50
25
20
25
30
89C 90
Sr Sr
no chem
10 3
10 3
ND 4
ND 4
ND 5
ND 5
ND 5
ND 5
ND 5
ND 5
ND 5
ND 5
ND 5
ND 5
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
ND 11
no chem
no chem
no chem
ND 5
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
66
-------
Appendix IV. Complete Milk Sampling Data(continued)
Location
Las Vegas, Nevada
Anderson Dairy #3
(Milk from Mesquite,
Nev. , Logandale,
Nev. , and Miner s-
ville, Utah)
Anderson Dairy #4
(Milk from Alamo,
Nev. )
Date of
Milking
4/25
4/28
4/28
4/29
5/01
5/02
5/03
5/04
5/05
5/07
5/08
5/09
4/28
4/30
5/01
5/02
5/02
5/04
5/04
5/05
5/06
5/06
5/07
5/08
5/08
5/09
5/10
5/10
5/12
5/14
5/16
5/19
Time
of Day
AM
AM
PM
PM
PM
PM
PM
PM
PM
PM
PM
PM
AM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
AM
PM
AM
AM
PM
AM
AM
PM
PM
PM
PM
AM
131I
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
60
ND
ND
50
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
60
ND
ND
30
ND
ND
100
100
133I
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
pCi/1
Cs
10
20
30
15
20
35
15
35
20
15
30
20
30
ND
30
40
ND
ND
30
30
20
25
30
25
10
30
25
25
20
20
15
20
89C 90_
Sr Sr
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
ND 7
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
ND 5
no chem
ND 5
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
Anderson Dairy #5
(Processed Milk)
5/02
AM
ND
ND
10
no chem
67
-------
Appendix IV. Complete Milk Sampling Data (continued)
Location
Las Vegas, Nevada
Arden Dairy
Meadow Gold Dairy
Vegas Valley Farms
Lund, Nevada
McKenzie Dairy
Panaca, Nevada
C & G Ranch
E. Deck Ranch
Date of
Milking
4/26
4/28
4/29
4/29
4/30
5/01
5/02
5/03
4/29
5/02
4/26
4/28
4/24
4/26
4/27
4/28
4/29
5/05
4/28
4/29
4/30
5/02
4/26
4/27
4/28
4/29
4/30
5/01
5/02
Time
of Day
PM
AM
AM
PM
AM
AM
AM
AM
PM
AM
AM
AM
PM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
PM
PM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
131I
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
50
70
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
133i
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
160
220
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
pCi/1
137
Cs
10
ND
15
15
30
ND
30
25
30
10
15
30
30
20
30
35
20
30
ND
35
70
90
55
60
35
35
30
40
60
89C 90
Sr Sr
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
68
-------
Appendix IV. Complete Milk Sampling Data (continued)
Location
Panaca, Nevada
K. Lee Ranch
Pioche, Nevada
Delmue Ranch
Horlacher Ranch
Rose Valley Ranch
Ursine, Nevada
Donahue Ranch
Lytle Ranch
Date of
Milking
4/26
4/27
4/30
4/30
5/02
5/03
5/04
5/05
5/06
5/07
5/08
5/09
5/10
4/27
4/27
4/28
4/29
4/30
5/01
5/03
4/26
4/28 .
5/03
5/04
5/05
5/06
5/10
4/27
4/28
4/29
4/30
5/01
Time
of Day
AM
AM
AM
PM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
PM
PM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM^
131I
ND
20
50
170
160
120
100
ND
50
ND
ND
ND
ND
30
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1100
320
ND
170
140
70
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
133
ND
210
20
60
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1200
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
pCi/1
137_
Cs
15
ND
35
40
65
40
50
10
30
25
15
30
15
60
50
20
50
25
20
45
15
45
20
40
25
10
15
20
30
ND
30
30
89- 90
Sr Sr
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
ND 15
ND 19
no chem
no chem
ND 14
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
69
-------
Appendix IV. Complete Milk Sampling Data (continued)
Location
Ursine, Nevada
Lytle Ranch
(continued)
McCrosky Ranch
Fredonia, Arizona
M. Button Ranch
Moccasin, Arizona
O. Johnson Ranch
Mt. Trumbull, Ariz.
O. Bundy Ranch
Barstow, Calif.
Hills Dairy
Brawley, Calif.
Dateland Dairy
Escondido, Calif.
Bernard Dairy
Date of
Milking
5/02
5/03
5/01
5/02
5/04
4/30
5/01
5/02
5/04
5/05
4/30
5/01
5/02
5/02
5/04
5/05
5/06
5/08
5/09
5/10
5/16
5/04
5/05
5/07
5/04
5/05
5/07
Time
, of Day
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
PM
AM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
AM
AM
PM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
131I
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
70
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
20
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
133
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
pCi/1
137_
Cs
30
50
65
50
40
ND
ND
45
ND
10
40
ND
55
35
15
25
ND
10
10
ND
ND
ND
10
ND
10
15
10
89C 90.,
Sr Sr
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
ND 9
ND 10
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
ND 6
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
ND 1
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
ND 2
no chem
no chem
70
-------
Appendix IV. Complete Milk Sampling Data(continued)
Location
Los Angeles, Calif.
Jessup Farms
Newhall, Calif.
Burbank Creamery
Riverside, Calif.
Orange Crest Dairy
Alamosa, Colorado
Alamosa Milk Co.
Brush, Colorado
McLagan Bros.
Creamery
Canon City, Colo.
Monarch Dairy, Inc.
Colorado Springs, Colo.
Senton Dairy Co.
Date of
Milking
5/05
5/06
5/07
5/08
5/09
5/10
5/11
5/05
5/06
5/04
5/05
5/06
5/07
5/08
5/09
4/29
4/30
5/03
5/04
4/27
4/28
4/29
4/30
5/01
5/02
4/26
4/29
-
4/28
4/30
Time
of Day
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
PM
PM.
PM
PM
PM
PM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
PM
PM
PM
PM
AM
AM
AM
131I
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
133
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
pCi/1
137_
Cs
15
25
20
20
25
10
20
60
ND
10
15
15
10
20
ND
20
20
20
10
10
55
45
ND
ND
30
15
15
30
10
89_ 90C
Sr Sr
ND 2
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
ND 2
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
71
-------
Appendix IV. Complete Milk Sampling Data (continued)
Date of
Location .
Milking
Senton Dairy Co.
(continued)
Craig, Colorado
Yampa Valley Dairy
Delta, Colorado
Arden Meadow Gold
Dairy
Durango, Colo.
Clover Rich Dairy
Ft. Collins, Colo.
Poudre Valley Cream-
ery
Glenwood Springs, Colo.
Glenwood Creamery
Grand Junction, Colo.
Clymer's Rose Glen
Dairy
5/01
5/02
4/28
5/01
5/04
5/08
5/09
5/11
4/27
4/28
4/29
4/28
4/29
4/30
5/01
5/02
5/03
4/27
4/28
4/29
4/30
5/01
5/02
5/03
5/04
4/26
4/27
4/28
4/29
5/03
4/26
4/27
4/29
Time
of Day
AM
AM
PM
PM
PM
PM
PM
PM
AM
PM
PM
PM
PM
PM
AM
PM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
PM
AM
AM
PM
AM
AM
PM
AM
131:
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
133i
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
pCi/1
137Cs
20
25
10
30
15
20
20
30
ND
30
25
15
20
15
20
10
25
35
40
40
ND
25
35
45
30
40
35
40
35
40
ND
20
15
89_ 90Q
Sr Sr
ND 1
no chem
ho chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
ND 14
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
ND 10
ND 10
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
ND 10
72
-------
Appendix IV. Complete Milk Sampling Data (continued)
Location
Date of
Milking
Time
of Day
pCi/1
131.
133.
137
Cs
89
Sr
90
Sr
Grand Junction, Colo.
Clymer's Rose Glen 5/01
Dairy 5/02
Monte Vista, Colo.
Sunrise Creamery 4/29
PM
PM
AM
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
10
10
no chem
no chem
no chem
Rocky Ford, Colo.
Rocky Ford Coop.
Creamery
Trinidad, Colo.
Petramala Dairy
Blackfoot, Idaho
Cammack Dairy
Buhl, Idaho
Smith's Dairy Products
Inc.
Burley, Idaho
Wymore Dairy
4/27
4/28
4/29
4/30
4/30
5/02
5/02
4/27
4/28
4/29
4/30
5/01
5/03
4/26
4/27
4/28
4/26
4/27
4/28
4/29
4/30
5/02
4/26
4/27
4/28
AM
AM
AM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
PM
AM
AM
PM
PM
AM
AM
PM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
20
ND
ND
15
20
ND
ND
10
10
ND
75
30
10
25
65
25
45
25
55
20
20
25
45
55
ND 6
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
73
-------
Appendix IV. Complete Milk Sampling Data(continued)
Location
Burley, Idaho
Wymore Dairy
(continued)
Coeur d'Alene, Idaho
Coeur d'Alene
Creamery
Grange ville, Idaho
Grangeville
Creamery
Idaho Falls, Idaho
Wallace Dairy
Jerome, Idaho
Ida Gem Dairymen,
Inc.
Lewis ton, Idaho
Golden Grain Dairy
Producers, Inc.
Date of
Milking
4/29
4/30
5/02
5/03
4/26
4/27
4/28
4/29
4/30
4/27
4/27
4/29
5/01
5/02
5/04
5/04
4/26
4/29
5/02
5/10
5/11
5/13
5/17
5/18
4/26
4/27
4/28
4/29
4/30
4/25
4/28
4/29
4/29
5/01
5/02
Time
of Day
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
PM
PM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
PM
AM
PM
PM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
PM
AM
AM
AM
AM
PM
PM
AM
PM
AM
AM
131I
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
70
30
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
13 3,
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
pCi/1
137Cs
40
40
55
40
65
70
60
80
55
75
10
75
70
65
70
80
50
30
55
30
35
25
40
15
30
ND
10
25
35
30
ND
ND
35
15
45
89C 90_
Sr Sr
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
ND 29
ND 15
ND 20
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
ND 10
no chem.
no chem
no chem
no chem
ND 13
no chem
no chem
no chem
ND 10
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
74
-------
Appendix IV. Complete Milk Sampling Data(continued)
Location
Date of
Milking
Time
of Day
pCi/1
131 133T 137
I I Cs
89Q
Sr
90C
Sr
Mt. Home, Idaho
Clover Hollow Dairy
Pocatello, Idaho
Ward's Dairy
4/26
AM
ND
ND
Beaver, Utah
G. Robert's Dairy
Cedar City, Utah
Matheson Dairy
Meadow Gold Dairy
Garrison, Utah
Gonder's Dairy
Kanab, Utah
J. Johnson Ranch
Minersville, Utah
Minersville Dairy
35
no chem
4/26
4/27
4/28
4/29
4/30
4/26
4/27
4/26
4/27
4/27
4/29
5/02
5/03
5/03
5/04
5/05
5/06
5/03
5/04
5/05
5/06
4/30
5/01
5/02
4/30
5/01
5/02
5/04
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
PM
AM
AM
PM
PM
PM
PM
PM
AM
AM
AM
PM
AM
AM
AM
PM
AM
PM
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
40
15
15
50
35
85
45
40
35
10
15
20
10
10
55
25
45
20
40
40
40
45
45
65
25
50
15
25
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
ND 10
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
ND 6
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
ND 8
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
ND 7
ND 8
ND 10
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
75
-------
Appendix IV. Complete Milk Sampling Data (continued)
Location
Mt. Pleasant, Utah
Brooklawn
Creamery
Ogden, Utah
Maple Leaf Dairy
Orderville, Utah
Chamberlain Ranch
Richfield, Utah
Ideal Dairy
St. George, Utah
R. Cox Dairy
St. George Ice Co.
Salt Lake City, Utah
Salt Lake Dairy Pool
Date of
Milking
4/27
4/28
4/29
5/01
5/02
5/02
5/03
5/04
4/27
4/30
5/03
5/01
5/01
4/29
5/04
4/26
4/29
4/30
5/01
5/03
5/04
5/06
4/30
5/01
5/02
4/25
4/28
4/29
4/29
5/02
5/03
5/07
Time
of Day
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
PM
AM
AM
AM
PM
PM
AM
PM
PM
AM
PM
PM
PM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
PM
AM
AM
PM
AM
AM
PM
131I
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
133i
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
pCi/1
137_
Cs
35
20
20
10
50
40
10
45
70
ND
40
25
10
30
40
30
25
25
25
30
ND
30
ND
20
25
15
45
20
35
50
30
45,
89C 90C
Sr Sr
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
ND 17
ND 17
no chem
no chem
no chem
ND 4
no chem
no chem
ND 5
ND 5
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
ND 10
ND 14
ND 12
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
76
-------
Appendix IV. Complete Milk Sampling Data (continued)
Location
Smithfield, Utah
Cache Valley Dairy
Products
Spanish Fork, Utah
Town Pride Dairy
Casper, Wyoming
Meadow Gold Dairy
Cheyenne, Wyoming
Dairy Gold Foods
Powell, Wyoming
Cream of the Valley
Dairy
Date of
Milking
4/26
4/29
5/02
5/03
5/04
4/25
4/27
4/28
4/29
4/30
5/01
5/02
5/04
5/06
4/28
4/28
4/29
4/30
5/02
5/04
5/06
4/25
4/26
4/27
4/28
4/29
5/01
5/02
5/03
4/26
4/26
4/26
4/27
4/27
Time
of Day
AM
AM
PM
PM
PM
AM
AM
AM
AM
PM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
PM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
PM
PM
PM
PM
PM
PM
PM
PM
AM
PM
PM
AM
PM
131:
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
60
20
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
133i
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
pCi/1
137_
Cs
30
40
ND
25
45
ND
40
85
30
30
30
35
45
45
25
ND
10
ND
10
30
35
20
15
25
ND
20
ND
20
20
35
15
50
30
30
89Q 90
Sr Sr
no chem
no chem
ND 17
no chem
no chem
ND 9
no chem
no chem
ND 10
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
ND 11
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
77
-------
Appendix IV. Complete Milk Sampling Data (continued)
Date of
Location .
Milking
Powell, Wyoming
Cream of the Valley
Dairy (continued)
Rawlins, Wyoming
Wyoming Dairy
Products
Riverton, Wyoming
Morning Star Dairy
Sheridan, Wyoming
Jersey Creamery, Inc.
4/27
4/29
4/29
4/30
5/01
5/02
4/26
4/27
4/29
4/30
5/01
5/02
5/03
4/25
4/27
4/29
4/26
4/27
4/27
4/28
4/30
Time
of Day
PM
AM
PM
PM
PM
PM
PM
PM
PM
PM
PM
PM
PM
PM
PM
PM
AM
AM
AM
AM
AM
131I
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
133i
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
pCi/1
13?Cs
15
15
20
35
10
ND
30
30
30
ND
25
35
45
ND
30
20
40
45
30
25
15
89C 90
Sr Sr
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
ND 13
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
no chem
ND = Not detected. Minimum detectable levels are:
131 133 137
1-20 pCi/1; 1-20 pCi/1; Cs - 10 pCi/1;
89 90
Sr - 5 pCi/1; Sr - 1 pCi/1.
*NA = Data not available.
78
-------
DISTRIBUTION
1-15 WERL, Las Vegas, Nevada
16 Robert E. Miller, Manager, NVOO/AEC, Las Vegas, Nevada
17 Robert H. Thalgott, NVOO/AEC, Las Vegas, Nevada
18 Henry G. Vennillion, NVOO/AEC, Las Vegas, Nevada
19 Chief, NOB/DNA, NVOO/AEC, Las Vegas, Nevada
20 Robert R. Loux, NVOO/AEC, Las Vegas, Nevada
21 Donald W. Hendricks, NVOO/AEC, Las Vegas, Nevada
22 Technical Library, NVOO/AEC, Las Vegas, Nevada
23 Mail & Records, NVOO/AEC, Las Vegas, Nevada
24 Martin B. Biles, DOS, USAEC, Washington, D.C.
25 Director, DMA, USAEC, Washington, D.C.
26 John S. Kelley, DPNE, USAEC, Washington, D.C.
27 Philip Allen, ARL/NOAA, NVOO/AEC, Las Vegas, Nevada
28 Gilbert J. Ferber, ARL/NOAA, Silver Spring, Maryland
29 Stanley M. Greenfield, Assistant Administrator for Research & Monitoring
EPA, Washington, D.C.
30 Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator for Radiation Programs,
EPA, Rockville, Maryland
31 Paul C. Tompkins, Act. Dir., Div. of Criteria & Standards, Office of
Radiation Program, EPA, Rockville, Maryland
32 Ernest D. Harvard, Acting Director, Division of Technology Assessment,
Office of Radiation Program, EPA, Rockville, Maryland
33 Bernd Kahn, Chief, Radiochemistry & Nuclear Engineering, NERC, Cincinnati,
Ohio
34 - 35 Charles L. Weaver, Acting Director, Division of Surveillance & Inspection,
Office of Radiation Programs, EPA, Rockville, Maryland
36 Gordon Everett, Director, Office of Technical Analysis, EPA,
Washington, D.C.
37 Regional Administrator, EPA, Region IX, San Francisco, California
38 Eastern Environmental Radiation Laboratory, EPA, Montgomery, Alabama
39 Acting Director, Twinbrook Research Laboratory, EPA, Rockville, Maryland
40 William C. King, LLL, Mercury, Nevada
41 James E. Carothers, LLL, Livermore, California
42 Roger E. Batzel, LLL, Livermore, California
43 William E. Ogle, LASL, Los Alamos, New Mexico
44 Harry S. Jordan, LASL, Los Alamos, New Mexico
45 Arden E. Bicker, REECo, Mercury, Nevada
46 Clinton S. Maupin, REECo, Mercury, Nevada
-------
Distribution (cont'd)
47 Charles F. Bild, Sandia Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico
48 Robert H. Wilson, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York
49 Richard S. Davidson, Battelle Memorial Institute, Columbus, Ohio
50 Frank E. Abbott, USAEC, Golden, Colorado
51 John M. Ward, President, Desert Research Institute, University of
Nevada, Reno
52 - 53 DTIE, Oak Ridge, Tennessee (for public availability)
------- |