SWRHL-60r
PARTICULATE EFFLUENT STUDY
PHOEBUS 2A—EP-IV and EP-V
by
Techn i caI Support
Environmental Surveillance
Southwestern Radiological Health Laboratory
Department of Health, Education and Welfare
Public Health Service
Bureau of Radiological Health
Consumer Protection and Environmental Health Service
June 1969
This surveillance performed under a Memorandum
Understanding (No. SF 54 373)
for the
U. S. ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION
of
-------
LEGAL NOTICE
This report was prepared as an account of Government sponsored
work. Neither the United States, nor the Atomic Energy Commission,
nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission:
A. Makes any warranty or representation, expressed or implied,
with respect to the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of the in-
formation contained in this report, or that the use of any information,
apparatus, method, or process disclosed in this report may not in-
fringe privately owned rights; or
B. Assumes any liabilities with respect to the use of, or for damages
resulting from the use of any information, apparatus, method, or pro-
cess disclosed in this report.
As used in the above, "person acting on behalf of the Commission" in-
cludes any employee or contractor of the Commission, or employee
of such contractor, to the extent that such employee or contractor of
the Commission, or employee of such contractor prepares, dissemin-
ates, or provides access to, any information pursuant to his employ-
ment or contract with the Commission, or his employment with such
contractor.
022
-------
SWRHL-60r
PARTIOULATE EFFLUENT STUDY
PHOEBLS 2A EP-IV and EP-V
by
Technical Support
Environmental Surveillance
Southwestern Radiological Health Laboratory
Department of Health, Education, and Welfare
Public Health Service
Bureau of Radiological Health
Consumer Protection and Environmental Health Service
June 1969
Copy No. 22
A. J. Whitman
NTSSO, AEC/NVOO
Las Vegas, Nevada
This surveillance performed under a Memorandum of
Understanding (No. SF 54 373)
for the
U. S. ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION
-------
ABSTRACT
The Phoebus 2A Experimental Plans IV and V were full-power nuclear
reactor operations conducted as part of Project Rover.
Experimental Plan IV was conducted on June 26, 1968 and Plan V was
conducted on July 18, 1968. Both tests were at the Nuclear Rocket
Development Station, Jackass Flats, Nevada.
This report, covering large particles of high activity, includes
particle deposition concentration at various distances; and gross physical
characteristics, chemical composition, and gross and specific radioactivity
of these particles.
Survey results indicated wide spread deposition for Plan IV with no
defined hotline. Plan V survey results indicated the major deposition
between 13° and 21 from Test Cell C.
The particles were porous and fragile and had a metallic black
appearance. Sizes ranged from eight to 200 um on Plan IV and seven to
163 |jjn on Plan V. The use of a latex spray reduced the shattering of
particles during collection and separation:
The chemical composition of the particles was primarily uranium oxides.
Fall velocity was determined in free air and liquid.
Gross activity of the particles was 10 - 10 fissions on both runs.
Alpha activity was not determined because of the method of mounting the
sample on glass slides with collodion. The primary radioisotopes found
by gamma spectroscopy were those of Sr, Zr, Ru, I, Ba, Mo, and Ce.
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
ABSTRACT i
TABLE OF CONTENTS ii
LIST OF TABLES iii
LIST OF FIGURES iv
I. INTRODUCTION 1
II. STUDY OBJECTIVES 1
III. FIELD ASSAY 2
A. Methods of Collection 2
B. OField Results - EP-IV 2
C. Field Results - EP-V 5
D. Discussion of Field Results 9
IV. LABORATORY ASSAY 9
A. Separation and Location 9
B. Physical Characteristics 10
C. Radiometric Analysis 12
D. Microprobe Analysis 15
E. Discussion of Laboratory Results 15
V. INTERPRETATION OF FIELD AND LABORATORY RESULTS 20
VI. SUMMARY 20
DEFINITION OF TERMS 24
REFERENCE LIST 25
APPENDIX 26
DISTRIBUTION
ii
-------
LIST OF TABLES
Page
TABLE 1 Power Integrals for Phoebus 2A 1
TABLE 2 Arc Data for Sampling 2
TABLE 3 Fall Velocity - Free Air Column 11
TABLE 4 Fall Velocity - Liquid Column 12
TABLE A-l Sample Location EP-IV 27
TABLE A-2 Sample Location EP-V 38
TABLE A-3 Particle Size and Location EP-IV 44
TABLE A-4 Special Samples 45
TABLE A-5 Particle Size and Location EP-V 46
TABLE A-6 Activity and Location of Samples EP-IV 49
TABLE A-7 Activity and Location of Samples EP-V 50
TABLE A-8 Isotopic Activities for Individual Specimens
EP-IV 53
TABLE A-9 Isotopic Activities for Individual Specimens
EP-V 54
TABLE A-10 Microprobe and X-ray Diffraction Data 56
TABLE A-ll Size Frequency Distribution EP-V 56
TABLE A-12 Ratios of Fission Product Activities Based on
99Mo EP-V 57
TABLE A-13 Ratio of Actual Ratios (to 99Mo) to Theoretical
Ratios (to 99Mo) for Each Isotope 58
iii
-------
LIST OF FIGURES
Page
FIGURE 1 Sampling Locations and Particle Concentration
EP-IV
FIGURE 2 Deposition Concentration versus Distance
EP-IV
FIGURE 3 Sampling Locations and Particle Concentration
EP-V
FIGURE 4 Survey Results in Three-Dimensional Representation
FIGURE 5 Deposition Concentration versus Distance EP-V
FIGURE 6 Typical and Theoretical Beta Decay
FIGURE 7 Size-Frequency Distribution EP-V
FIGURE 8 Activity versus Size EP-IV
FIGURE 9 Activity versus Size EP-V
FIGURE 10 Activity per Unit Area versus Distance
FIGURE 11 Scatter Diagram of Size versus Distance EP-V
6
7
8
14
16
18
19
21
22
iv
-------
PARTICULATE EFFLUENT STUDY
PHOEBUS 2A EP-IV and EP-V
I. INTRODUCTION
The Phoebus 2A reactor engine Experimental Plans (EP's) IV and V were
conducted on June 26 and July 18, 1968, as part of Project Rover; Los Alamos
Scientific Laboratory (LASL). The experiments were conducted at Test Cell C,
Nuclear Rocket Development Station (NRDS), Jackass Flats, Nevada. The
power integrals for the plans are listed in Table 1.
TABLE 1
Power Integrals for Phoebus 2A*
EP-JV .. 4.6xl06 Mw-sec
EP-V 2.5xl06 Mw-sec
*Mw-sec = Megawatt-seconds (thermal)
This report contains the results of work performed by the National
Center for Radiological Health at the Southwestern Radiological Health
Laboratory (SWRHL) as outlined in the "Project Proposal for Reactor Effluent
Studies - Particulate", August 1, 1967.
II. STUDY OBJECTIVES
The objectives presented in the Project Proposal that were accomplished
in this study were the determination of:
1. Deposition concentration (particles per m^) profile of particles
both downwind and normal to the downwind axis.
2. Line of maximum deposition.
3. Physical, chemical, and radiometric characteristics of the radio-
active particulate material collected.
4. Particle size versus distance.
-------
III. FIELD ASSAY
A. Methods of Collection
Sampling routes were pre-established at approximately 15, 25,
40, 50, and 110 miles from Test Cell C, along existing roads. The
distances between sampling locations and areas surveyed at each
location are listed in Table 2. Specific instructions listed in
Appendix A were given to each sampling team.
TABLE 2
Arc Data for Sampling*
ARC MILES
FROM TEST
CELL C
15
25
40
50
110
AREA
SURVEYED
(m2)
30
30
50
50
100
NUMBER OF
(along
EP-IV
59
43
22
19
LOCATIONS
the arc)
EP-V
23
24
17
DISTANCE BETWEEN
LOCATIONS
(mi)
0.5
0.5
1
1
1
*Definition of terms on Page 24.
B. Field Results - EP-IV
Figure 1 shows the area surveyed along with particle concentration
at each location. The results of the particle survey for EP-IV are
presented in Table A-I. The table gives azimuth and distance of the
location from Test Cell C, total particles found at a location and
the particle concentration. Although the major effort was exerted
between 30 and 113 from Test Cell C, a search was conducted on
Highway 95 (147° to 164 ) because aerial data showed a portion of
the cloud passed over that area. No particles were found along
Highway 95.
The change in average deposition concentration with distance is
shown in Figure 2. Curve A illustrates the ratio of the total number
-------
PHOEBUS 2A
EP IV
6/26/68
0. 03 Number of particles
per square meter
T T Survey location
10
SCALE IN MILES
Figure 1. Sampling locations and particle concentrations - EP-IV.
3
-------
M
0)
fn
C5
a
8
c
0>
o
o
o
Q>
H
O
•i-l
+J
h
0.
0.01
0.001
# of Part.
Positive Area
B =
# of Part.
Total Area
10
20 30 40
Distance from Test Cell C (miles)
Figure Z. Deposition concentration versus distance - EP-IV.
-------
of particles found along an arc to the total positive location areas
versus distance from Test Cell C. Curve B is the ratio of the
total number of particles found along an arc to the total area sur-
veyed between edges of the deposition pattern.* As expected, both
curves show a decrease in concentration with distance.
On Run + 1 and 2 days, nineteen particles which measured greater
than 100 mR/hr (open probe on an E-500B) were picked up for a
special biological study. These particles were collected within a
one mile radius of CP-1, but were not considered in concentration
calculations.
C. Field Results - EP-V
Survey results for EP-V are presented in Table A-2. Figure 3
shows sampling locations and particle concentrations. The major
activity was found between 13 and 21 with no defined hotline. The
lack of definition of a hotline may be due to weather or the starting,
stopping, and restarting of the reactor.
A three dimensional representation of particle deposition
concentration is shown in Figure 4. The concentrations are in
particles per square meter.
The change in average deposition concentration with distance is
shown in Figure 5, in the same manner as Figure 2. The curves show
a decrease in concentration with distance.
*For example, on the 40 mile arc, after EP-IV, a total of three
particles were found between 49 and 65 degrees. One particle was
found at each of three locations (positive area = 150 m^). For
Curve A this would represent a value of 3/150 or 0.02. A total of
twelve areas (600 m2) were surveyed between 49 and 65 degrees. For
Curve B this would represent a value of 3/600 or 0.005.
-------
9 S
PHOEBUS 2A
EP V
7/18/68
0. 03 Number of particles
per square meter
T T Survey location
10
15
SCALE IN MILES
Figure 3. Sampling locations and particle concentrations - EP-V.
6
-------
16; Miles
25 Miles
Figure 4. Survey results in three dimensional representation - EP-V.
-------
E
to
r-l
o
•H
cts
Q.
o
•H
+->
rt
h
-P
C
0)
o
I
a)
rH
O
fi
0.
0.0
0.001
A =
B =
of Part.
Positive Area
# of Part.
Total Area
10
20 30 40 50
Distance from Test Cell C (miles)
Figure 5. Deposition concentration versus distance - EP-V.
-------
D. Discussion of Field Results
The field results are similar to previous tests (1). Weather
at the time of the EP-IV run showed an unstable vertical temperature
structure with light and variable winds. Inspection of field data
indicated a widespread deposition with no defined hotline which was
probably due to the light and variable winds. The peak particle
concentration is lower by a factor of two than was anticipated from
post-run predictions (4).
On EP-V, the weather conditions were more stable than on EP-IV.
The multi-peak deposition patterns, as shown on Figure 4, may be
due to wind shear at the time of the run (3). The particle
concentration for EP-V is higher by a factor of three than was
predicted (4).
Both experiments showed a decrease in particle concentration
with distance, Figures 2 and 5. Curves A, on both figures, had
approximately the same slope. These curves are similar to those
for previous tests (1) for the same distances.
IV. LABORATORY ASSAY
All samples were returned to SWRHL for analysis. After the radio-
active material was separated from the matrix, physical.measurements were
made. On selected samples, radiometric and microprobe analyses were
performed.' Analytical procedures were the same for both EP-IV and EP-V.
A. Separation and Location
Initial separation was performed by dividing the sample into
small portions and checking each portion with a laboratory radiation
monitor. The portions containing activity were mounted on 1" x 3"
glass slides using collodion.
-------
The use of latex (see Appendix A) during collection kept particle
fracturing to a minimum. In a few cases more than one active portion
was obtained from a sample, but this was minimal when compared with
previous particle separation (1). A radioautographic technique was
used to precisely locate the radioactive material. After location,
the collodion used to hold the material was starred for future
reference.
B. physical Characteristics
A microscope was used to determine the appearance and size of
the material. Most particles were large enough to be sized at
lOOx magnification. The radioactive material appeared to be porous,
black to reddish color, and somewhat spherical. Some of the
particles were quite fragile and shattered when touched.
All particles collected from both tests were sized. Sizing was
accomplished using a filar micrometer eyepiece in the microscope
to measure the maximum dimension and the dimension perpendicular
to the maximum (9). Table A-3 presents the size data for EP-IV.
Table A-4 presents data from the EP-IV special samples, which were
collected in the CP-1 area without regard to area covered; therefore,
no specific location is given. Table A-5 presents the size data
from EP-V. The equivalent diameter, defined as the square root of
the product of the two measurements, is given in parentheses,
Tables A-3 and A-5. Some specimens had more than one particle (due
to fracturing) and an equivalent diameter was not calculated.
Fall velocity was measured on a few selected particles using
an air column and a liquid column. One particle from EP-IV
(Sample No. 399) and three of the most active particles from EP-V
were dropped in free air in a vertically mounted, one-inch diameter
(I.D.) glass tube. Two Nal(Tl) detectors were positioned 10 feet
apart on the tube. The signals from the detectors were fed into a
multi-channel analyzer operating in the multi-sealer mode. Fall-time
10
-------
was determined from the interval between detection of the particle
at each detector. Each particle was dropped at least twice; two
were dropped four times. The average of these times was used in the
calculations. Data from the tests are presented in Table 3.
TABLE 3
Fall Velocity
Free Air Column*
SAMPLE NO.
399
503
541
542B
DIAMETER - |J. DISTANCE
(Equivalent Area) OF FALL
(cm)
164 304.8
50 304.8
153 304.8
65.4 304.8
TIME OF FALL
(sec)
3.7
3.8
10.7
13.3
14.8
12.0
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
5.7
5.7
5.9
FALL VELOCITY
(cm/sec)
81.9
24
89.7
52.8
*Viscosity - 182.7 micropoises
After being dropped in the air column, the particles were
isolated so they could be dropped in a liquid column (1).
Samples 399 and 503 shattered in the isolation process. The data
obtained from Sample 541 and 542B are presented in Table 4.
11
-------
TABLE 4
Fall Velocity
Liquid Column*
SAMPLE NO.
541
542B
DIAMETER - u,
(Equivalent Area)
153
76.3
DISTANCE
OF FALL
(cm)
20.79
20.79
TIME OF FALL
(sec)
29.3
97.0
FALL VELOCITY
(cm/sec)
0.71
0.21
*Fluid Viscosity - 2.67 centipoises
Fluid Density - 0.883 grams per cubic centimeter
An attempt was made to determine the density of the particles
from Stokes1, Rubey's, and Oseen's equations.(8). Values of
1.51, 15.7, and 2.49, respectively, were obtained. The wide
variation in calculated densities is due to the non-applicability
of the equations used. Due to the relatively large size and mass,
all particles had Reynolds numbers outside of the range for which
the equations were valid. An empirical calibration will be performed
with similar material. These results will be reported in a later
paper.
C. Radiometric Analysis
All specimens from EP-IV were beta counted and gamma scanned.
Alpha counting was not attempted because the method of mounting the
material with 30% collodion covered the sample. All specimens from
EP-V were beta counted and 22 were gamma scanned.
Beta activity is reported in dpm, fissions*, and picocuries for
individual specimens. Table A-6 presents data for EP-IV as of
July 9, 1968, while Table A-7 presents data for EP-V as of
July 23, 1968. Locations (azimuth and distance from Test Cell C)
are also given in each table. ;Eleven specimens from EP-IV and ten
*The activity in fissions is a normalization of activity.
12
-------
from EP-V were beta counted over an extended period of time to follow
decay and to determine the average maximum beta energy. Decay curves
of the samples plotted on log-log paper had essentially the same
shape and slope indicating sample similarity. Comparison of the
decay curves with published data (5) shows reasonable agreement
with gross mixed fission product decay, Figure 6.
Beta absorption tests, using aluminum absorbers, were run
concurrently with beta decays. The average maximum beta energy for
each specimen was determined from the half-thickness value of
aluminum absorbers and was used to select the counting efficiency.
All absorption curves were about the same shape. The average
maximum beta energy for the specimens was about 1.3 MeV and no
trends were observed as a function of age. The average maximum
beta energy is close to the 1.2 MeV reported for gross mixed
fission products (6).
Gamma scanning was performed on a multi-channel analyzer with
a 4" x 4" Nal(Tl) detector. The data were reduced by hand using a
series of gamma scans to obtain qualitative and quantitative
information.
Table A-8 presents the isotopic data for EP-IV. There were
91 97 239
indications of Sr, Zr, and Np, but lack of sufficient
counting data made quantitative values questionable. The reported
values have been extrapolated to 1409 on run day (6/26/68).
Table A-9 presents the isotopic data for EP-V. These values
have been extrapolated to 1608 on run day (7/26/68). The percent
of each isotope due to EP-V is given in parentheses at the top of
the column. This percentage was calculated from the power integrals
from each run and the decay time between the runs.
13
-------
io
3
C
•H
E
8.
c
o
•H
•P
2
bo
c
•H
Cfl
•H
Q
10f
Glendenin, et.al.
Typicali
1 2 34567891D 20 30
Time after Fission (days)
Figure 6. Typical beta decay versus theoretical.
14
-------
D. Microprobe Analysis
Electron microprobe and X-ray diffraction analyses were performed
on seven specimens. Microprobe examination was made to determine
the elemental composition of the specimen and X-ray diffraction
analysis was made to determine the chemical composition. The micro-
probu and X-ray diffraction data are reported in Table A-10. The
elements and compounds are listed in order of decreasing concentration.
Samples D-l and D-2 were samples from the fall velocity tests, but
individual particles could not be recovered from the liquid column
for microprobe or diffraction examination.
Sample 417 indicated niobium with the electron microprobe, but
X-ray diffraction did not show compounds of niobium. While this
may fie an artifact of the orientation of the analysis, this suggests
that niobium was not a major component of the particle.
E. Discussion of Laboratory Results.
The size data from EP-IV were not suitable for size-frequency
distribution calculations because of the small amount of non-
fractured particles. The size-frequency distribution for EP-V was
calculated using an equivalent area diameter for those particles
that were not fractured. On the 15 mile arc, 27 of 41 (66%) were
not fractured and were used in the calculations. On the 25 mile
arc, 24 of 33 (73%) were used. The difficulty in trying to "glue"
fractured particles together limited the use of the remaining
specimens.
The calculated (7) results of the size-frequency distribution
are presented in Table A-ll. The graphical results are presented
in Figure 7. The larger geometric mean diameter at the 25 mile arc
is caused by the difference in size distributions below 70 (JL. This
difference may be real, but is probably due to the relative small
numbers of particles from each arc.
15
-------
200
100
90
80
70
60
& 50
40
30
20
10
K—x 15 mile Arc
•—• 25 mile Arc
_L
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
% by Number = Indicated Size
95
98 99
Figure 7. Size frequency distribution - EP-V.
-------
A linear regression of activity and size for EP-IV gave the
following equation:
Fissions x 1010 = 0.033 x size (JJL) - 0.165
The value 0.033 had a range of 0.009 to 0.056 at the 95% C.L.,
whi^i the constant -0.165 was between -1.28 and 0.96 (95% C.L.).
A correlation coefficient of 0.73 was found, which indicates a
fairly strong correlation between size and activity, even though
a limited amount of data were available. The data are presented
graphically in Figure 8.
The correlation of activity and size for EP-V data gave the
following equation:
Fissions x 1010 = 0.105 x size (JJL) - 3.4
The best estimate of the relationship between X and Y, 0.105,
had the range of 0.062 to 0.148 (95% C.L.). The best estimate of
the constant, -3.4, had the range of -6.45 to -0.35. A correlation
coefficient of 0.573 was found for this data. Even though the EP-V
correlation coefficient is not as high as the EP-IV coefficient, it
does indicate the two variables are not independent of each other.
The data used are presented graphically in Figure 9. The circled
points in Figure 9 are EP-IV data. It can be seen that they fit
within the range of values found for EP-V data.
235
Theoretical abundances of U fission products at one hour
99
after fission relative to Mo, were obtained from Bolles and
Ballou (5). Isotopic values identified for each sample were also
99
related to the amount of Mo found. These ratios are presented
in Table A-12. The ratio calculated for each sample was divided by
the corresponding ratio calculated from Bolles and Ballou to
determine an "enrichment factor" for the isotope relative to the
amount expected. These enrichment factors are presented in Table A-13.
-------
10.0
o
r-4
O
1-4
X
CO
c
0
•H
tn
w 1.0
Fissions xlO1 = 0.033 x size(|j.) - 0.165.
>,
+*
•H
>
•H
O
0.1
I 1 1
1 1 1 I 1 I
3 4 56789 10
50
100
Size ((j.)
Figure 8. Activity versus size EP-V.
18
-------
10.0
o
rH
O
K 1.0
c
o
•H
tn
w
•H
n.i
/Fissions x 1010 = 0.105 x size(|ji)
X - 3.4
o-EP-IV data 0
x-EP-V data
EP-V data only used for this
correlation
10
20 30
40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Size (|j.)
200
Figure 9. Size versus activity - EP-V.
19
-------
91 133 140
Table A-13 shows that Sr, I, and Ba are about as
expected. The other isotopes seem to be enriched considerably.
99 91 133 140
It may also mean that Mo, Sr, I, and Ba are depleted
relative to the other isotopes.
V. INTERPRETATION OF FIELD AND LABORATORY RESULTS
Comparison of activity per unit area and distance shows a decrease
of activity per unit area with distance for EP-IV, Figure 10. The activity
per unit area is calculated by dividing the activity for an arc by the
total area*.
Figures 8 and 10 indicate a possible correlation of size and
distance for EP-IV. However, the limited number of particles found on
this EP does not warrant the expansion of the data.
Table A-ll and Figure 11 both show a slight increase of particle
size with distance between 15 and 25 miles on EP-V. Figure 10 demonstrates
this, also, with an increase in activity from 15 to 25 miles. The
correlation between Table A-ll and Figure 10 is consistent with the
positive correlation found between particle size and activity.
VI. SUMMARY
Both' EP-IV and EP-V of the Phoebus 2A reactor ejected fragile
particles, ,^which registered several mR/hr to several hundred mR/hr at a
few inchQft with the open probe of an E-500B. Particles were located and
*
sampled out to about 40 miles. Field results were similar to previous
reactor tests. The material collected had properties similar to that
collected following previous tests. Electron microprobe and X-ray
diffraction analysis showed that the particles were composed of reactor
core material.
*Total area is the total plot area as defined on Page 5.
20
-------
0.6
^ 0.1
Ifl
C
o
OJ
0)
•P
•H
C
a
>>
u
<
0.01
0.003
Area used is total area between edges
X EP-V
o EP-IV
15
20 25 30 35
Distance from Test Cell C
40
Figure 10. Activity per unit area versus distance.
21
-------
300
200
100
X
X
3 50
w
*
X
t
X
10
10
20 30 40
Distance from Test Cell C (miles)
Figure 11. Scatter diagram of size versus distance - EP-V.
22
-------
A correlation of size versus activity was obtained for both EP's .
with the correlation coefficient for EP-IV being 0.73 and 0.57 for EP-V.
The particle concentration decreased with distance but specific inverse
relationships could not be developed.
23
-------
DEFINITION OF TERMS
Particle - Reactor material, may be beads, shells, flakes, etc.,
identified as a single hot spot in the survey of a one-square-
meter plot.
Particle Concentration - Number of particles per unit area, as
determined from the survey.
Sample - The volume of material (sand and reactor material) collected
with one identifiable hot spot obtained in the field, i.e.,
Sample 404.
Specimen - The volume of material containing activity from a sample,
i.e., 500A, 500B, etc., mounted on a 1" x 3" glass slide - more
than one radioactive specimen may result from a single sample
(particle) due to fracturing, separation, etc.
Location - Place identified by azimuth and distance at which a specific
number of one-square-meter areas were surveyed.
24
-------
REFERENCE LIST
1. SWRHL, Particle Effluent Study, NRX A-6, EP-III.
2. Meteorological Data, Phoebus 2A, EP-IV, June 26, 1968.
3. ESSA, ARLOLV, An Analysis of Weather Conditions and Cloud Transport
Associated with the Phoebus 2A Reactor Test, Experimental Plan V.
Las Vegas, Nevada, August 6, 1968.
4. ESSA, ARLOLV, Post Run Radiation Level and Particle Prediction Curves
for the Phoebus 2A Test Series, Las Vegas, Nevada, August 1968.
5. Bolles, R.C. and Ballou, N.E. , Calculated Activities and Abundances
of 235U Fission Products, R and D USNRDL-456, NS081-001.
6. Lockhart and Patterson, Critical Analysis of Measurement of Gross
Fission Product Activity in the Air at Ground Level, NRL 5440,
February 1960.
7. Smith, John E. and Jordon, Myra L. , Mathematical and Graphical
Interpretation of the Log-Normal Law for Particle Size Distribution
Analyses, Journal of Colloid Science, Volume 19, pp. 549-599, 1964.
8. Blancty and Maxwell, B. , Method for Determining the Density of
Microaize Spherical Particles, Geological Society of America Bulletin,
78, pp. 385-404, March 1967.
9. Drafta,, Ronald G. , Sizing Particles with a Microscope, The Particle
Analyst, Volume 1, September 1, 1968.
25
-------
APPENDIX A
Sampling Instructions
1. Drive to the designated area.
2. At a distance of at least 50 feet from the road, place a one-meter
square template on the ground as many times as necessary to obtain
the specified plot area. (Example - an arc at 16 miles, 30 place-
ments of the template would be required).
3. With an E-500B survey instrument, search the area inside each
template for hot spots. Trace a path back and forth across the
area, sweeping a one foot wide path, with the probe held
horizontally six inches above the ground. The beta shield will be
opened and facing downward.
4. After a hot spot is found, spray the area with a thin film of
latex. Continue on to complete the area.
5. After the latex has dried, peel up and place in a container.
Label each container and record information on log sheet.
6. Move to the next sampling plot and repeat.
26
-------
APPENDIX A
TABLE A-l
SAMPLE LOCATION
EP-IV
DATE
COLLECTED
6/26/68
6/26/68
6/26/68
6/26/68
6/26/68
62/6/68
6/26/68
6/26/68
6/26/68
6/26/68
6/26/68
LOCATION
Junction - Orange
Road and Pahute
Mesa Road
0.5 mi S Junction
Orange Road and
Pahute Mesa Road
1 mi S Junction
Orange Road and
Pahute Mesa Road
1.5 mi S Junction
Orange Road and
Pahute Mesa Road
2 mi S Junction
Orange Road and
Pahute Mesa Road
2.5 mi S Junction
Orange Road and
Pahute Mesa Road
3 mi S Junction
Orange Road and
Pahute Mesa Road
3.5 mi S Junction
Orange Road and
Pahute Mesa Road
4 mi S Junction
Orange Roa d and
Pahute Mesa Road
4.5 mi S Junction
Orange Road and
Pahute Mesa Road
5 mi S Junction
Orange Road and
Pahute Mesa Road
AZIMUTH
FROM TEST
CELL C
(°True)
30
31
32
34
36
38
40
42
43
44.5
46
DISTANCE
FROM TEST
CELL C
(mi)
18
17.5
17
17
17
17
16.5
16
16
15
15.5
NO. OF PARTICLE
PARTICLES CONCENTRATION
PER AREA (part./m2)
SURVEYED
(m2)
0/30 0.0
0/30 0.0
0/30 0.0
0/30 0.0
0/30 0.0
0/30 0.0
1/30 0.033
2/30* 0.066
2/30 0.066
0/30 0.0
0/30 0.0
*Not recovered from field.
27
-------
TABLE A-l (cont)
DATE
COLLECTED
6/26/68
6/26/68
6/26/68
6/26/68
6/26/68
6/26/68
6/26/68
6/26/68
6/26/68
6/26/68
6/26/68
6/26/68
LOCATION AZIMUTH
FROM TEST
CELL C
(°True)
5.5 mi S Junction 48
Orange Road and
Pahute Mesa Road
6 mi S Junction 50
Orange Road and
Pahute Mesa Road
6.5 mi S Junction 52.5
Orange Road and
Pahute Mesa Road
7 mi S Junction 54.5
Orange Road and
Pahute Mesa Road
7.5 mi S Junction 57
Orange Road and
Pahute Mesa Road
Junction - Orange 59
Road and Mercury
Highway
0.5 mi S Junction 61
Orange Road and
Mercury Highway
1 mi S Junction 63
Orange Road and
Mercury Highway
1.5 mi S Junction 66
Orange Road and
Mercury Highway
2 mi S Junction 68
Orange Road and
Mercury Highway
2.5 mi S Junction 70
Orange Road and
Mercury Highway
3 mi S Junction 72
Orange Road and
Mercury Highway
DISTANCE
FROM TEST
CELL C
(mi)
15.5
15
15
15
14.5
14.5
14
14
14
14
14
14
NO. OF
PARTICLES
PER AREA
SURVEYED
<»2>
0/30
1/30
0/30
1/30
0/30
2/30
0/30
0/30
2/30
2/30
0/30
0/30
PARTICLE
CONCENTRATION
(part./m2)
0.0
0.033
0.0
0.033
0.0
0.066
0.0
0.0
0.066
0.066
0.0
0.0
28
-------
TABLE A-l (cont)
DATE LOCATION
COLLECTED
AZIMUTH DISTANCE NO. OF PARTICLE
FROM TEST FROM TEST PARTICLES CONCENTRATION
CELL C CELL C PER AREA (part./m2)
(°True) (mi) SURVEYED
-------
TABLE A-l (cont)
DATE
COLLECTED
6/26/68
6/26/68
6/26/68
6/26/68
6/26/68
6/26/68
6/26/68
6/26/68
6/26/68
6/26/68
6/26/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
LOCATION
9.5 mi S Junction
Orange Road and
Mercury Highway
10 mi S Junction
Orange Road and
Mercury Highway
10.5 mi S Junction
Orange Road and
Mercury Highway
11 mi S Junction
Orange Road and
Mercury Highway
11.5 mi S Junction
Orange Roa d and
Mercury Highway
12 mi S Junction
Orange Road and
Mercury Highway
12.5 mi S Junction
Orange Road and
Mercury Highway
13 mi S Junction
Orange Road and
Mercury Highway
13.5 mi S Junction
Orange Road and
Mercury Highway
14 mi S Junction
Orange Road and
Mercury Highway
Junction - Mercury
Highway and Short
Pole Road
Camera Station
Butte
0.5 mi E Camera
Station Butte
AZIMUTH
FROM TEST
CELL C
(°True)
99.5
102
103.5
105
106
108
109.5
110.5
111
112
113
49
47.4
DISTANCE
FROM TEST
CELL C
(mi)
14.5
14.5
14.5
15
15.5
16
16
16.5
17
17.5
18
21.5
21
NO. OF
PARTICLES
PER AREA
SURVEYED
(m2)
0/30
0/30
0/30
0/30
0/30
0/30
0/30
0/30
0/30
0/30
0/30
2/30
0/30
PARTICLE
CONCENTRATION
(part./m2)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.066
0.0
30
-------
TABLE A-l (cont)
DATE
COLLECTED
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
LOCATION AZIMUTH
FROM TEST
CELL C
o
( True)
1 mi E Camera 46. 5
Station Butte
1 mi E 0.5 mi N 45.5
Camera Station
Butte
1 mi E 1 mi N 43
Camera Station
Butte
. 1.5 mi N Camera 42
Station Butte
2 mi N Camera 41
Station Butte
2.5 mi N Camera 40
Station Butte
3 mi N Camera 38.5
Station Butte
3.5 mi N Camera 38
Station Butte
4 mi N Junction 39
Papoose Lake Road
0.5 mi E Junction 40
Papoose Lake Road
1 mi E Junction 41
Papoose Lake Road
1.5 mi E Junction 42.5
Papoose Lake Road
2 mi E Junction 44
Papoose Lake Road
2.5 mi E Junction 45
Papoose Lake Road
Junction - East 46.5
Fort Scarp Canyon
Road
0.5 mi S Junction 47.5
East Fork Scarp
-. Canyon Road
DISTANCE NO. OF
FROM TEST PARTICLES
CELL C PER AREA
(mi) SURVEYED
(n>2>
21 0/30
21 0/30
22 0/30
22.5 0/30
23 0/30
23.5 0/30
24 0/30
24,5 0/30
25 0/30
25.5 0/30
24.5 0/30
25.5 0/30
26 0/30
26.5 0/30
26 0/30
25.5 0/30
PARTICLE
CONCENTRATION
(part./m2)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
31
-------
TABLE A-l (cont)
DATE
COLLECTED
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
LOCATION
1 mi S Junction
East Fork Scarp
Canyon Road
1.5 mi S Junction
East Fork Scarp
Canyon Road
2 mi S Junction
East Fork Scarp
Canyon Road
2.5 mi S Junction
East Fork Scarp
Canyon Road
3 mi S Junction
East Fork Scarp
Canyon Road
3.5 mi S Junction
East Fork Scarp
Canyon Road
4 mi S Junction
East Fork Scarp
Canyon Road
4.5 mi S Junction
East Fork Scarp
Canyon Road
5 mi S Junction
East Fork Scarp
Canyon Road
5.5 mi S Junction
East Fork Scarp
Canyon Road
6 mi S Junction
East Fork Scarp
Canyon Road
6.5 mi S Junction
East Fork Scarp
Canyon Road
AZIMUTH
FROM TEST
CELL C
(°True)
48.5
49.5
50.5
52
53
54
55
56
56.5
57.5
58.5
59.5
DISTANCE
FROM TEST
CELL C
(mi)
25
25
25
24.5
24
24
23.5
23.5
23
23
23
22.5
NO. OF
PARTICLES
PER AREA
SURVEYED
(m2)
0/30
0/30
0/30
0/30
0/30
0/30
0/30
0/30
0/30
0/30
0/30
0/30
PARTICLE
CONCENTRATION
(part./m2)
vO.O
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
32
-------
TABLE A-l (cont)
DATE
COLLECTED
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
LOCATION
7 mi S Junction
East Fork Scarp
Canyon Road
7.5 mi S Junction
East Fork Scarp
Canyon Road
8 mi S Junction
East Fork Scarp
Canyon Road
8.5 mi S Junction
East Fork Scarp
Canyon Road
9 mi S Junction
East Fork Scarp
Canyon Road
9.5 mi S Junction
East Fork Scarp
Canyon Road
10 mi S Junction
East Fork Scarp
Canyon Road
10.5 mi S Junction
East Fork Scarp
Canyon Road
11 mi S Junction
East Fork Scarp
Canyon Road
11.5 mi S Junction
East Fork Scarp
Canyon Road
12 mi S Junction
East Fork Scarp
Canyon Road
12.5 mi S Junction
East Fork Scarp
Canyon Road
AZIMUTH
FROM TEST
CELL C
(°True)
61
62
63
64.5
66
67
68.5
70
71.5
73
74.5
76
DISTANCE
FROM TEST
CELL C
(mi)
22.5
22
22
21.5
21.5
21.5
21.5
21.5
21.5
21
21
21.5
NO. OF PARTICLE
PARTICLES CONCENTRATION
PER AREA (part./m2)
SURVEYED
(m2)
0/30 0.0
0/30 0.0
1/30 0.033
0/30 0.0
0/30 0.0
0/30 0.0
0/30 0.0
0/30 0.0
0/30 0.0
0/30 0.0
0/30 0.0
0/30 0.0
33
-------
TABLE A-l (cont)
DATE
COLLECTED
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
LOCATION AZIMUTH
FROM TEST
CELL C
(°True)
13 mi S Junction
East Fork Scarp
Canyon Road
(Junction -
Scarp Canyon and
Nye Canyon)
SE edge Groom Lake
1 mi S SE edge
Groom Lake
2 mi S SE edge
Groom Lake
3 mi S SE edge
Groom Lake
4 mi S SE edge
Groom Lake
5 mi S SE edge
Groom Lake
6 mi S SE edge
Groom Lake
7 mi S SE edge
Groom Lake
8 mi S SE edge
Groom Lake
9 mi S SE edge
Groom Lake
10 mi S SE edge
Groom Lake
11 mi S SE edge
Groom Lake
12 mi S SE edge
Groom Lake
13 mi S SE edge
Groom Lake
14 mi S SE' edge
78.5
45
46
48
49
50.5
52
53.5
55
56.5
58
59.5
61
63.5
64
65
DISTANCE
FROM TEST
CELL C
(mi)
21
40
39.5
39.5
39
39
38.5
38.5
38.5
38
37.5
37.5
37
37
37.5
38
NO. OF PARTICLE
PARTICLES CONCENTRATION
PER AREA (part./m2)
SURVEYED
(m2)
0/30
0/50
0/50
0/50
1/50
0/50
1/50
0/50
0/50
0/50
0/50
• •
0/50
0/50
0/50
0/50
1/50
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.02
Groom Lake
34
-------
TABLE A-l (cont)
DATE
COLLECTED
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
LOCATION
15 mi S SE edge
Groom Lake
16 mi S SE edge
Groom Lake
17 mi S SE edge
Groom Lake
18 mi S SE edge
Groom Lake
19 mi S SE edge
Groom Lake
20 mi S SE edge
Groom Lake
21 mi S SE edge
Groom Lake
6.5 mi S Alamo
(Highway 93)
7.5 mi S Alamo
(Highway 93)
8.5 mi S Alamo
(Highway 93)
9.5 mi S Alamo
(Highway 93)
10.5 mi S Alamo
(Highway 93)
11.5 mi S Alamo
(Highway 93)
12.5 mi S Alamo
(Highway 93)
13.5 mi S Alamo
(Highway 93)
14.5 mi S Alamo
(Highway 93)
15.5 mi S Alamo
(Highway 93)
AZIMUTH
FROM TEST
CELL C
(°True)
67
68.5
70
71.5
73
74.5
76
63
64
65
66
67
67.5
68
69
69.5
70
DISTANCE
FROM TEST
CELL C
(mi)
38
38
38
38
37.5
37
36.5
110.5
110
110
110
110
110.5
110.5
111
111
112
NO. OF
PARTICLES
PER AREA
SURVEYED
(m2)
0/50
0/50
0/50
0/50
0/50
0/50
0/50
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
PARTICLE
CONCENTRATION
(part./m2)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
35
-------
TABLE A-l (cont)
DATE LOCATION
COLLECTED
AZIMUTH DISTANCE NO. OF PARTICLE
FROM TEST FROM TEST PARTICLES CONCENTRATION
CELL C CELL C PER AREA (part./m2)
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
6/27/68
16.5 mi S Alamo
(Highway 93)
17.5 mi S Alamo
(Highway 93)
18.5 mi S Alamo
(Highway 93)
19.5 mi S Alamo
(Highway 93)
20.5 mi S Alamo
(Highay 93)
21.5 mi S Alamo
(Highway 93)
22.5 mi S Alamo
(Highway 93)
23.5 mi S Alamo
(Highway 93)
24.5 mi S Alamo
(Highway 93)
13 mi E Lathrop
Wells
13.5 mi E Lathrop
Wells
14 mi E Lathrop
Wells
14.5 mi E Lathrop
Wells
15 mi E Lathrop
Wells
15.5 mi E Lathrop
Wells
16 mi E Lathrop
Wells
16.5 mi E Lathrop
Wells
( True)
70.5
71
72
72.5
73.5
74.5
75
75.5
76.5
164
163
162
160
159
158
156
155
(mi)
112.5
113
112.5
112
112.5
112.5
112.5
112.5
112.5
18
18.5
18.5
19
19.5
19.5
20
20
SURVEYED
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
0/30
0/30
0/30
0/30
0/30
0/30
0/30
0/30
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
36
-------
TABLE A-l (cont)
DATE LOCATION
COLLECTED
AZIMUTH DISTANCE NO, <.v .Vv.iVlCLE
FROM TEST FROM TEST PARTICLES CONCENTRATION
CELL C CELL C PER AREA (part./m2)
(°True) (mi) SURVEYED
(m2)
6/27/68 17 mi E Lathrop
Wells
6/27/68 17.5 mi E Lathrop
Wells
6/27/68 18 mi E Lathrop
Wells
6/27/68 18.5 mi E Lathrop
Wells
6/27/68
19 mi E Lathrop
Wells
153
151
150
148
147
20.5
20.5
21
21
20.5
0/30
0/30
0/30
0/30
0/30
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
37
-------
APPENDIX A
TABLE A-2
SAMPLE LOCATION
EP-V
DATE LOCATION
COLLECTED
AZIMUTH
FROM TEST
CELL C
(°True)
DISTANCE
FROM TEST
CELL C
(mi)
NO. OF
PARTICLES
PER AREA
SURVEYED
(m2)
PARTICLE
CONCENTRATION
(part./m2)
7/18/68 Junction - 40 mi 351 15 0/30
Canyon Road and
Buckboard Mesa Rd
7/18/68 0.5 mi E Junction 352.5 15 0/30
40 mi Canyon Road
and Buckboard Mesa
Road
7/18/68 1 mi E Junction 355 15 0/30
40 mi Canyon Road
and Buckboard Mesa
Road
7/18/68 1.5 mi E Junction 358 15 0/30
40 mi Canyon Road
and Buckboard Mesa
Road
7/18/68 2 mi E Junction 359 14.5 0/30
40 mi Canyon Road
and Buckboard Mesa
Road
7/18/68 2.5 mi E Junction 001 14.5 0/30
40 mi Canyon Road
and Buckboard Mesa
Road
7/18/68 3 mi E Junction 003.5 14.5 1/30
40 mi Canyon Road
and Buckboard Mesa
Road
7/18/68 3.5 mi E Junction 005.5 14.5 1/30
40 mi Canyon Road
and Buckboard Mesa
Road
7/18/68 4 mi E Junction 007.5 14.5 1/30
40 mi Canyon Road
and Buckboard Mesa
Road
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.033
0.033
0.033
38
-------
TABLE A-2 (cont)
DATE LOCATION
COLLECTED
AZIMUTH
FROM TEST
CELL C
( True)
DISTANCE
FROM TEST
CELL C
(mi)
NO. OF
PARTICLES
PER AREA
SURVEYED
(m2)
PARTICLE
CONCENTRATION
(part./m2)
7/18/68 4.5 mi E Junction 10 14.5 2/30* 0.066
40 mi Canyon Road
and Buckboard Mesa
Road
7/18/68 5 mi E Junction 11.5 15 2/30 0.066
40 mi Canyon Road
and Buckboard Mesa
Road
7/18/68 5.5 mi E Junction 14 15 5/30 0.166
40 mi Canyon Road
and Buckboard Mesa
Road
7/18/68 6 mi E Junction 15.5 15 1/30 0.033
40 mi Canyon Road
and Buckboard Mesa
Road
7/18/68 6.5 mi E Junction 17 15.5 3/30 0.1
40 mi Canyon Road
and Buckboard Mesa
Road
7/18/68 7 mi E Junction 18 16 1/30 0.033
40 mi Canyon Road
and Buckboard Mesa
Road
7/19/68 7.5 mi E Junction 18.5 16 2/30 0.066
40 mi Canyon Road
and Buckboard Mesa
Road
7/19/68 Junction - Buckboard 19 16.5 1/30 0.033
Mesa Road and Pahute
Mesa Road
7/19/68 0.5 mi E Junction 19.5 17 2/30 0.066
Buckboard Mesa
Road and Pahute
Mesa Road
7/19/68 1 mi E Junction 20 17.5 1/30 0.033
Buckboard Mesa
Road and Pahute
Mesa Road
*1 lost in field recovery
39
-------
TABLE A-2 (cont)
DATE
COLLECTED
LOCATION
AZIMUTH
FROM TEST
CELL C
( True)
DISTANCE NO. OF PARTICLE
FROM TEST PARTICLES CONCENTRATION
CELL C PER AREA (part./m2)
(mi) SURVEYED
(n,2)
7/19/68 1.5 mi E Junction 22 18 6/30
Buckboard Mesa
Road and Pahute
Mesa Road
7/19/68 2 mi E Junction 23.5 18 0/30
Buckboard Mesa
Road and Pahute
Mesa Road
7/19/68 2.5 mi E Junction 25 18 3/30
Buckboard Mesa
Road and Pahute
Mesa Road
7/19/68 3 mi E Junction 27 18 0/30
Buckboard Mesa
Road and Pahute
Mesa Road
7/19/68 1.5 mi E Junction 006.5 22 0/30
Pahute Mesa Road
and Stockade Wash
Road
7/19/68 2 mi E Junction 007.5 22 0/30
Pahute Mesa Road
and Stockade Wash
Road
7/19/68 2.5 mi E Junction 008.5 22.5 0/30
Pahute Mesa Road
and Stockade Wash
Road
7/19/68 3 mi E Junction 10 22.5 0/30
Pahute Mesa Road
and Stockade Wash
Road
7/19/68 3.5 mi E Junction 11 22.5 1/30
Pahute Mesa Road
and Stockade Wash
Road
7/19/68 4 mi E Junction 12.5 23 0/30
Pahute Mesa Road
and Stockade Wash
Road
0.2
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.033
0.0
40
-------
TABLE A-2 (cont)
DATE
COLLECTED
LOCATION
AZIMUTH DISTANCE NO. OF PARTICLE
FROM TEST FROM TEST PARTICLES CONCENTRATION
CELL C CELL C PER AREA (part./m2)
(°True) (mi) SURVEYED
(m2)
7/19/68 4.5 mi E Junction 13.5 23 1/30
Pahute Mesa Road
and Stockade Wash
Road
7/19/68 5 mi E Junction 13.5 23.5 2/30
Pahute Mesa Road
and Stockade Wash
Road
7/19/68 5.5 mi E Junction 13.5 24 3/30
Pahute Mesa Road
and Stockade Wash
Road
7/19/68 6 mi E Junction 13.5 24.5 0/30
Pahute Mesa Road
and Stockade Wash
Road
7/19/68 6.5 mi E Junction 14 25 0/30
Pahute Mesa Road
and Stockade Wash
Road
7/19/68 7 mi E Junction 14.5 25 1/30
Pahute Mesa Road
and Stockade Wash
Road
7/19/68 7.5 mi E Junction 16 25 4/30
Pahute Mesa Road
and Stockade Wash
Road
7/19/68 Junction - 17 25 4/30
Stockade Wash Road
and Orange Road
7/19/68 0.5 mi E Junction 18 25 1/30
Stockade Wash Road
and Orange Road
7/19/68 1 mi E junction 19 25 2/30
Stockade Wash Road
and Orange Road
0.033
0.066
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.033
0.133
0.133
0.033
0.066
41
-------
TABLE A-2 (cont)
DATE
COLLECTED
7/19/68
7/19/68
7/19/68
7/19/68
7/19/68
7/19/68
7/19/68
7/19/68
7/19/68
7/19/68
7/19/68
7/19/68
7/19/68
7/19/68
LOCATION
1.5 mi E Junction
Stockade Wash Road
and Orange Road
2 mi E Junction
Stockade Wash Road
and Orange Road
2.5 mi E Junction
Stockade Wash Road
and Orange Road
3 mi E Junction
Stockade Wash Road
and Orange Road
3.5 mi E Junction
Stockade Wash Road
and Orange Road
4 mi E Junction
Stockade Wash Road
and Orange Road
4.5 mi E Junction
Stockade Wash Road
and Orange Road
5 mi E Junction
Stockade Wash Road
and Orange Road
Stake 34 - Kawich
Valley
1 mi E Stake 34 -
Kawich Valley
2 mi E State 34 -
Kawich Valley
3 mi E Stake 34 -
Kawich Valley
Junction - Stakes
35, 36, 37
1 mi N Junction
Stakes 35, 36, 37
AZIMUTH
FROM TEST
CELL C
( True)
21
22
23
24.5
25
26
27.5
28.5
005.5
007
008
009
10
11
DISTANCE
FROM TEST
CELL C
(mi)
25
24.5
24.5
24
24
24
23.5
23
46.5
46.5
46
46.5
46
47
NO. OF
PARTICLES
PER AREA
SURVEYED
(m2)
3/30
1/30
2/30
2/30
1/30
1/30
1/30
0/30
0/50
0/50
0/50
0/50
0/50
0/50
PARTICLE
CONCENTRATION
(part./m2)
0.1
0.033
0.066
0.066
0.033
0.033
0.033
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
42
-------
TABLE A-2 (cont)
DATE
COLLECTED
7/19/68
7/19/68
7/19/68
7/19/68
7/19/68
7/19/68
7/19/68
7/19/68
7/19/68
7/19/68
7/19/68
LOCATION AZIMUTH
FROM TEST
CELL C
(°True)
2 mi N Junction 11
Stakes 35, 36, 37
3 mi N Junction 11
Stakes 35, 36, 37
4 mi N Junction 11
Stakes 35, 36, 37
5 mi N Junction 11
Stakes 35,. 36, 37
6 mi N Junction 11
Stakes 35, 36, 37
7 mi N Junction 11
Stakes 35, 36, 37
7 mi N, 1 mi E 12
Junction - Stakes
35, 36, 37
7 mi N, 2 mi E 13
Junction - Stakes
35, 36, 37
7 mi N, 3 mi E 14
Junction - Stakes
35, 36, 37
7 mi N, 4 mi E 15
Junction - Stakes
35, 36, 37
7 mi N, 5 mi E 16
Junction - Stakes
35, 36, 37
DISTANCE NO. OF
FROM TEST PARTICLES
CELL C PER AREA
(mi) SURVEYED
(m2)
48
49
50
51
52
53
53
53
53
53
53
0/50
0/50
0/50
0/50
0/50
0/50
0/50
0/50
0/50
0/50
0/50
PARTICLE
CONCENTRATION
(part./m2)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
43
-------
SAMPLE; NO.
400**
401***
402**
403****
404
405
406**
407
408
409
410
411
412 -
413
414
415
416
417
418
419****
420
PARTICLE
AZIMUTH FROM
TEST CELL C
( True)
40
43
43
50
54.5
59
59
66
66
66
66
74
74
. 76
87
49
49
63
49
52
65
APPENDIX A
TABLE A -3
SIZES AND LOCATION
EP-IV
DISTANCE
FROM TEST
CELL C
(mi)
16.5
16
16
15
15
14.5 -
14.5
14 i
. 14
14
14
14.5
14.5
14.5
14.5
21.5
21.5
22
39
38.5
38
SIZE*
(n>
83x85, 25.4x25.4, several
flakes (10-20 JJL)
Lost
25.4x24.2, 43x35
Lost (on rock)
20.5x31 (25.2)
24.8x19.5, 200x165.5
54.2x59.5, 22.5x19, 21x27.2,
15x15
41x42.7 (41.8)
33x32, 33x35, 34x21
121x150, 22.5x19.5
8x9 (8.5)
42.5x43, 48.4x44
40x42 (41)
30x22, 48x48
48x71.5 (58.5)
50x45, 66x36
26x24.6 (25.3)
53.5x53.5 (53.5)
44.7x41 (42.8)
21x18.5, several on rock
82.4x94.3 (88.1)
*The number in ( ) is the equivalent diameter
**Shattered in Radioautographic (AR) process
***Lost from slide in AR process
****Couldn't remove from rock
44
-------
APPENDIX A
TABLE A-4
SPECIAL SAMPLES*
SAMPLE NO.
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
SIZE (^)
75x90
30x30
90x75
90x90
90x75
75x90
45x65
75x45
105x120
120x75
150x150
60x45
45x45
75x90
30x45
105x150
30x30
60x60
45x30
*Collected within 1 mile radius
of CP-1
45
-------
APPENDIX A
TABLE A -5
PARTICLE SIZES AND
SAMPLE NO.
500A
500B
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510A
510B
5 IOC
510D
511
512A
512B
512C
512D
5 ISA
513B
513C
513D
514
515
518
*The number
AZIMUTH FROM
TEST CELL C
(°True)
3.5
3.5
5.5
7.5
10
11.5
11.5
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
15.5
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
18
19
in ( ) is the
EP-V
DISTANCE
FROM TEST
CELL C
(mi)
14.5
14.5
14.5
14.5
14.5
14
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15.5
15.5
15.5
15.5
15.5
15.5
15.5
15.5
15.5
16
16.5
LOCATION
SIZE*
(HO
100x51.7 (71.9)
74.7x90 (82)
100x73 (85.4)
25x42 (32.4)
53.2x46.9 (50)
52x45 (48.4)
31.2x35 (33)
91x58 (72.6)
35.7x22.5 (28.3)
55.4x57.5 (56.4)
22.7x30.5 (26.3)
38x23 (29.6)
113x92.7 (102)
43.2x25.6, 45.5x43
91.5x83.8 (87.5)
39x35 (36.9)
27x23 (24.9)
43x88.9 (61.8)
23.7x15.5 (19.2)
15.7x16.6, 13.5x17.8
33.5x31.6 (32.5)
95x109, 17.5x17.5, 29x14
37.5x45.7, 15x20, 14x15
33.8x30, 14.4x19.8
39x34 (36.4)
47x44.5 (45.7)
30x25.5 (27.7)
equivalent diameter.
46
-------
TABLE A-5 (cont)
SAMPLE NO.
519A
519B
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
53 1A
53 IB
53 1C
532
533A
533B
534
535
536
537
539
540
. 541
542A
542B
AZIMUTH FROM
TEST CELL C
(°True)
19.5
19.5
19.5
20
22
22
22
22
22
22
25
25
25
11
11
11
13.5
13.5
13.5
13.5
13.5
13.5
14.5
16
16
16
16
16
DISTANCE
FROM TEST
CELL C
(mi)
17
17
17
17.5
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
22.5
22.5
22.5
23
23.5
23.5
24
24
24
25
25
25
25
25
25
SIZE*
(HO
11.5x11.5, 45.5x37.2
94.8x88.2, 24.2x27.9
24x39.1 (30.6)
57.5x69 several & 20|j.
7.2x7.2, 22.2x25.9
124x136 (130)
Several 10-20|u. Shell ripped
92x90 (91.5)
155x133 (144)
Large rock
41.2x59.6 (49.6)
35.1x29.5, 100x94.5
61.9x61.5, 118x131
63.4x73.2, 9x12
87.8x64, 16x14
23.6x21.5, 13x12.4, 28.5x28.5,
24x18.5
56x51.6 (53.8)
19.5x15.4, 15.5x15
69x66 (67.4)
Large rock
42.5x58.4 (49.8)
18.4x13.9, 92.5x70.6, 153x163
Several 10-20(j, flakes (shattered
bead)
45.5x54.5 (49.8)
9.2x9.2 (9.2)
174x135 (153)
13.7x12.6, 39.9x32.2
63.4x67.4 (65.4)
47
-------
TABLE A-5 (cont)
SAMPLE NO.
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
AZIMUTH FROM
TEST CELL C
(°True)
17
17
17
17
18
19
19
21
21
21
22
23
23
24.5
24.5
25
26
27
DISTANCE
FROM TEST
CELL C
(mi)
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
24.5
24.5
24.5
24
24
24
24
23.5
SIZE*
(H-)
38.5x49.7 (43.7)
143x82.5 (109)
15x15 (15)
80.1x65 (72.1)
34.5x37.1 (35.8)
73.5x73.5 (73.5)
36.1x34.3 (35.1)
109x115 (112)
60.5x68.5 (64.4)
131x115 (123)
69.6x66.2 (67.9)
86.4x78.2 (82.2)
1
59.5x65.4 (62.4) <
28x28, 15x15, 15x10, 12.5x12.5,
30x30
100x62.5 (79.1)
41.8x25 (32.3)
123x60.5 (86.3)
143x80.4 (107)
48
-------
APPENDIX A
TABLE A -6
ACTIVITY AND LOCATION OF SAMPLES
EP-IV
ARC
(mi)
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
25
25
25
40
40
40
SAMPLE
NO.
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
4l8
419
420
ACTIVITY* .
FISSIONS
(xlO10)
14
5.6
9.9
0.6
0.8
1.6
0.2
0.2
4.2
19
0.02
0.006
2.2
2.1
1.0
0.9
1
2.4
0.5
1.5
2.9
dpm
(xlO3)
1,400
570
1,000
60
77
170
20
20
430
2,000
2
0.6
230
220
97
91
97
240
49
156
300
pCi
(x!03)
640
260
450
27
35
75
9
9
190
900
0.7
0.3
100
98
44
41
44
110
22
70
130
AZIMUTH FROM
TEST CELL C
( True)
40
43
43
50
54.5
59
59
66
66
66
66
74
74
76
87
49
49
63
49
52
65
DISTANCE
FROM TEST
CELL C
(mi)
16.5
16
16
15
15
14.5
14.5
14
14
14
14
14.5
14.5
14.5
14.5
21.5
21.5
22
39
38.5
38
*dpm and pCi at 7/9/68
49
-------
APPENDIX A
TABLE A-7
ACTIVITY AND LOCATION OF ^SAMPLES
EP-V
ARC
(mi)
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
*dpm
SAMPLE
NO.
500A
500B
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510A
51QB
510C
510D
511
512A
512B
512C
512D
5 ISA
513B
513C
513D
514
515
518
and pCi at
ACTIVITY*
FISSIONS
(xlO10)
2.6
3.8
2.9
0.5
1.2
6.3
6.1
2.4
1.2
2.0
0.9
0.1
1.2
0.7
1.8
0.5
0.3
3.0
0.5
0.1
0.4
4.3
0.6
2.5
1.1
1.1
0.8
7/23/68
dpm
(xlO3)
600
860
660
110
270
1,400
1,400
540
270
453
220
30
280
160
410
120
76
680
100
39
100
980
130
560
250
240
190
pCi
(xlO3)
270
390
300
48
120
650
620
240
120
200
97
13
130
72
180
52
34
310
47
18
46
440
60
250
110
110
85
AZIMUTH FROM
TEST CELL C
( True)
3.5
5.5
7.5
10
11.5
11.5
14
14
14
14
14
15.5
17
17
17
18
19
DISTANCE
FROM TEST
CELL C
(mi)
14.5
14.5
14.5
14.5
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15.5
15.5
15.5
16
16.5
50
-------
TABLE A-7 (cont)
ARC
(mi)
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
SAMPLE
NO.
519A
519B
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531A
53 IB
531C
532
533A
533B
534
535
536
537
539
540
541
542A
542B
543
544
ACTIVITY*
FISSIONS
(xlQlO)
0.6
3.5
0.4
15
0.3
0.4
7.7
2.0
9.5
2.1
1.4
3.2
9.4
3.8
7.4
1.2
0.1
1.1
3.8
2.4
2.0
11
7.6
2.1
0.009
37
0.1
1.9
2.5
0.01
dpm
(x!03)
133
800
84
3,500
62
94
1,700
450
2,200
480
330
730
2,100
880
1,700
280
23
260
870
550
450
2,400
1,700
480
2
8,500
23
430
560
23
pCi
(x!03)
60
360
38
1,600
28
42
790
200
970
210
150
330
960
400
760
130
10
120
390
250
200
1,100
780
210
0.9
3,800
10
190
250
10
AZIMUTH FROM
TEST CELL C
(°True)
19.5
19.5
20
22
22
22
22
22
22
25
25
25
11
13.5
13.5
13.5
13.5
13.5
13.5
14.5
16
16
16
16
17
17
DISTANCE
FROM TEST
CELL C
(mi)
17
17
17.5
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
22.5
23
23.5
23.5
24
24
24
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
51
-------
TABLE A-7 (cont)
ARC
(mi)
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
SAMPLE
NO.
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
ACTIVITY*
FISSIONS
0.4
0.2
1
1.9
1.2
2.8
3.2
19
3.5
1.0
0.5
3
0.3
1.4
1
20
dpm
(xlO3)
93
55
220
430
270
630
730
4,400
790
230
110
690
78
330
220
4,500
pCi
(xlO3)
42
25
99
190
120
290
330
2,000
360
100
48
310
35
150
100
2,000
AZIMUTH FROM
TEST CELL C
( True)
17
17
18
19
19
21
21
21
22
23
23
24.5
24.5
25
26
27.5
DISTANCE
FROM TEST
CELL C
(mi)
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
24.5
24.5
24.5
24
24
24
24
23.5
52
-------
APPENDIX A
TABLE A-8
LSOTOPIC ACTIVITIES
FOR INDIVIDUAL SPECIMENS* - EP-IV
pCi xlO3
ISOTOPE
SAMPLE NO.
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
95^
Zr
210
0.5
170
40
40
12
43
43
6
230
67
7.8
31
32
32
26
20
10
19
36
140
Ba
440
0.3
260
84
1.8
12
33
16
1.5
180
100
7.5
34
29
30
26
11
2.9
16
59
141
Ce
330
0.4
120
67
2.6
13
37
22
2.2
220
91 .
8.4
29
33
35
20
11
4.5
19
58
14?Nd
340
0.
280
66
4.
16
77
50
2.
390
120
11
31
46
50
21
23
12
29
60
4
2
7
*Activity at 1409, June 26, 1968.
53
-------
APPENDIX A
TABLE A-9
ISOTOPIC ACTIVITIES FOR
INDIVIDUAL SPECIMENS* - EP-V
pCi xlO3
ISOTOPE**
SAMPLE NO.
501
502
504
505
506
507
508
509
510A
510B
510C
510D
511
512A
513B
513C
513D
514
531A
53 IB
531C
539
543
548
552
553
91
Sr
(100)
1,100
270
2,400
2,600
980
530
880
360
50
470
480
54
300
. 220
2,100
250
1,100
660
1,100
1,400
610
880
1,500
750
6,500
1,000
95Zr
(58)
54
10
130
160
51
21
37
13
2.3
30
23
30
13
7.5
100
12
61
25
74
150
20
42
57
35
250
61
Wr,
Zr
(100)
1,300
310
870
1,700
1,000
540
820
420
41
280
250
470
400
300
2,200
120
610
270
1,500
1,800
300
580
300
170
1,600
240
99,,
Mo
(99)
9
4.4
24
60
30
9.3
120
5.5
6.3
63
35
4.7
2.9
7.3
15
15
9.6
2.5
6.2
27
14
13
20
14
62
3.9
103
Ru
(45)
23
3.2
61
93
26
9
11
6.9
1.4
16
9.6
11
2.9
5.4
41
3.7
84
6.2
32
58
7.8
12
21
10
100
22
133_ 135][ 140Ba
(100) (100) (65)
— *** 3,600 42
7.4
200
440 180
5,500 69
73 27
5,000 29
840 14
1.5
53 21
17
_____ ;_ 25
850 6.3
5.9
6,400 68
13 9.1
__ 39
_ 15
————— 72
120 140
47 23
30
64
31
320
1,800 63
141,,
Ce
(47)
40
11
140
210
80
31
35
18
1.9
23
19
26
11
6.5
74
7.8
42
19
89
190
28
49
58
43
470
86
143,,
Ce
(100)
650
140
1,300
1,600
590
330
430
210
30
280
290
310
180
93
1,300
150
750
410
680
1,800
260
500
670
330
4,100
660
239XT
Np
(100)
700
76
1,200
1,900
610
210
400
130
26
310
380
390
110
77
1,200
120
830
360
720
1,600
210
260
700
270
2,800
390
54
-------
TABLE A-9 (cont)
99
103
133,
135.
140.
ISOTOPE**
SAMPLE NO.
556
559
560
Sr
(100)
1,300
560
580
Zr
(58)
58
21
390
Zr
(100)
1,100
310
36,000
Mo
(99)
21
15
28
Ru
(45)
41
15
190
(100)
370
60
1,700
I Ba
(100) (65)
01
38
4f>fi
Ce
(47)
99
37
480
Ce
(100)
780
320
4,400
Np
(100)
1,000
250
5,900
*Activity at 1608, July 18, 1968
**Percent of activity due to EP-V in ( )
***Not Present
55
-------
APPENDIX A
TABLE A-10
MICROPROBE AND X-RAY DIFFRACTION DATA
SAMPLE NO.
404
411
417
530
550
D-l
D-2
RUN
EP-IV
EP-IV
EP-IV
EP-V
EP-V
PROBE
ANALYSIS
_«« — )k
*
U, 0, Nb, C
U, 0
U, 0
U, 0
U, 0
DIFFRACTION ANALYSIS
U02, U205
U02, U205
U2°5
U02' U2°5
**
U02' U2°5
uo2, u2o5,
UC2
*Excess of latex covering particle.
**Sample had high activity causing darkening of X-ray film.
TABLE A-11
SIZE-FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION EP-V
GEOMETRIC GEOMETRIC
MEAN DIAMETER STANDARD DEVIATION
15 mi Arc 48.2 1.77
25 mi Arc 57 2.04
-------
APPENDIX A
TABLE A-12
RATIOS OF FISSION PRODUCT ACTIVITIES BASED ON 99Mo EP-V
SAMPLE NO.
91
Sr
95
Zr
97
Zr
99,, 103n 133
Mo Ru I
135.
140 141 143
Ba Ce Ce
501
5O^
504
505
506
507
508
509
CT AA
OXUA
510B
_lf.
oxUC
<^i nn
OXUJJ
511
51 2A
513B
513C
si °.n
014
COT A
ooxA
531B
531C
__„
ooy
_ ._
O4d
548
__2
553
556
559
560
Bolles &
Ballou
120
C~[
Ol
i nn
iUU
4.3
33
57
7.3
65
7 Q
' . y
7.5
1 A
if*
100
o.n
ou
140
17
1 "30
ZbU
i an
XoU
52
44
«a
Oo
__
/ o
54
"
i nn
Xv/w
260
62
19
21
5.8
6
.
.
2.
0.
2.
0.
2.
,
0.
•
•
4.
i
x .
6.
0.
7
* .
1U
1 2
L&
5.
1.
.
.
i
A
16
2.
0.
1.
0.
7
9
3
3
4
5
5
7
8
.
6
4
8
7
4
05
140
/U
oc
ot>
28
33
58
6.8
76
6C
. O
4.4
71
. X
i nn
XUU
140
2__
150
8.0
71
/ J.
iin
JL XU
- ._
4U
67
21
.
4O
i f%
13
1 2
A
_
62
52
10
1,300
4.1
1.0
1f\
• u
1f\
.U
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
i n
i.U
1.0
i n
JL .U
i n
1 . U
1.0
T n
J- .U
1.0
1.0
In
. u
i n
J- . u
In
.U
1.0
1.0
i n
JL . U
i n
i.U
i n
J. . U
1 n
x . u
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
2
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
2
0
2
0
i
X
5
2
0
6
0
.6 400
7 ____ ____
5____ ___—
.6 7.3
.9 180
7.8
.1 42
.3 '• 150
.2 0.8
3— __ —— —«
.0 290
7 _ __ ____
.7 430
3f\ Q
V • J
.
3___._ ___
.1 4.4
.6 3.4
9____ ____
____ ____
i __—_ ____
7 _
.6 460
.0 15
.5 2.0
.8 61
.04 7.5 8.9
4.7
1 7
x . /
80.
. o
3.0
2.3
2.9
0.2
1.8
02
. ^
0.3
OK
. o
K q
O . O
2.2
00
• o
4.5
0.6
4C
. o
6n
. u
12
x
5.2
1.6
20
. O
_ 2
o.-s
22
. ^
c: 2
ij . ^
16
4.3
1.3
14
2.3
4.
2
^ .
.
3.
2.
3.
0.
3.
«
0.
.
r
J.
3.
•
4.
0.
.
7
i .
1 4
7.
2.
„
•
9
.
7
1 c
22
4.
1.
17
0.
4
5
7
3
3
3
„
4
8
9
5
0
0
i
X
7
2
09
72
Q 2
o . **
54
27
20
35
3.6
38
4 R
" • o
4.4
8*5
• o
fifi
OO
62
1 ?
J.O
87
10
R7
O f
i fin
X Dv/
Tin
X XVJ
67
19
OQ
OO
O./1
*J H
24
tt*±
fifi
w
170
37
11
160
1.9
*Theoreti<:jijil ratios for gross mixed fission products (5),
57
-------
APPENDIX A
TABLE A-13
RATIO OF ACTUAL RATIOS (to 99Mo) TO THEORETICAL RATIOS (to 99Mo)
FOR EACH ISOTOPE
SAMPLE NO.
501
502
504
505
506
507
508
509
510A
510B
510C
510D
511
512A
513B
513C
513D
514
53 1A
531B
53 1C
539
543
548
552
553
556
559
560
91^
Sr
20.6
10.5
17.2
0.7
5
9.8
1.2
11.2
1.4
1.3
2.4
1.9
17.2
5.2
24.1
2.9
22.4
44.8
31.0
8.9
7.6
11.7
12.9
9.3
17.2
44.8
10.7
3.3
3.6
95^,
Zr
120
46
110
54
18
46
6
48
8
10
14
130
90
20
130
16
140
200
240
110
28
64
58
50
80
320
56
14
28
97^
Zr
34
17
9
7
8
14
2
19
2
1
2
24
34
61
37
2
17
27
59
16
5
11
4
3
6
15
13
2
320
"„
Mo
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
103,, 133 _ 135T
Ru I I
65 — 45
18
63
40 1.0
23 20
25 1.0
3 — 5
33 — 17
5 —
5 0.1
8
58
25 — 33
18
68 — 48
7.5 0.1
250
63
130
53 0.6
15 0.5
23
28
18
40
140 — 52
50 2
13 0.3
170 8.1
140
Ba
2
0.7
4
1
1
1
0.1
0.8
0.1
0.1
0.2
2
0.9
0.3
2
0.3
2
3
5
2
0.7
1
1
1
2
7
2
0.6
6
141,,
Ce
49
28
64
39
30
37
3
37
3
4
5
61
42
10
54
6
54
84
160
78
20
42
32
34
84
240
52
13
190
4'Ce
37
2
28
14
11
18
2
20
3
2
4
35
33
7
46
5
46
84
58
35
10
20
18
13
35
89
19
6
84
58
-------
DISTRIBUTION
1-15 SWRHL, Las Vegas, Nevada
16 Robert E. Miller, Manager, AEC/NVOO, Las Vegas, Nevada
17 Robert H. Thalgott, Test Manager, AEC/NVOO, Las Vegas, Nevada
18 Henry G. Vermi I I ion, AEC/NVOO, Las Vegas, Nevada
19 D. W. Hendricks, AEC/NVOO, Las Vegas, Nevada
20 Robert R. Loux, AEC/NVOO, Las Vegas, Nevada
21 Central Mail & Records, AEC/NVOO, Las Vegas, Nevada
22 A. J. Whitman, NTSSO, AEC/NVOO, Las Vegas, Nevada
23 M. Klein, SNPO, Washington, D. C.
24 R. Decker, SNPO, Washington, D. C.
25 R. Hartfield, SNPO-C, Cleveland, Ohio
26 J. P. Jewett, SNPO-N, Jackass Flats, Nevada
27 - 30 R. Nelson, SNPO-N, NRDS, Jackass Flats, Nevada
31 WilliamC. King, LRL, Mercury, Nevada
32 Roger Batzel, LRL, Livermore, California
33 H. L. Reynolds, LRL, Livermore, California
34 H. T. Knight, LASL, Jackass Flats, Nevada
35 P. Gothels, LASL, Los Alamos, New Mexico
36 Harry S. Jordan, LASL, Los Alamos, New Mexico
37 Charles I. Browne, LASL, Los Alamos, New Mexico
38 William E. Ogle, LASL, Los Alamos, New Mexico
39 C. A. De Lorenzo, NTO, Jackass Flats, Nevada
40 H. G. Simens, NTO, Aero-jet General Corp., Jackass Flats, Nevada
41 R. Smith, NTO, Jackass Flats, Nevada
42 G. Grandy, WANL, NRDS, Jackass Flats, Nevada
43 E. Hemmerle, WANL, Pittsburgh, Pa.
44 M. I, Goldman, NUS, Washington, D. C.
45 J. Mohrbacher, Pan.Am. World Airways, Jackass Flats, Nevada
46 P. Allen, ARL/ESSA, AEC/NVOO, Las Vegas, Nevada
47 Martin B. Biles, DOS, USAEC, Washington, D. C.
48 H. Booth, ARL/ESSA, Las Vegas, Nevada
-------
49 C. Anderson, EG&G, Las Vegas, Nevada
50 Byron Murphey, Sandia Corporation, Albuquerque, N. Mex.
51 Maj.Gen, Edward B. Gi Iler, DMA, USAEC, Washington, D. C.
52 Chief, NOB/DASA, AEC/NVOO, Las Vegas, Nevada
53 - 57 Charles L. Weaver, PHS, BRH, Rockvi Ile, Maryland
58 Victor M. Milligan, REECo, Mercury, Nevada
59 - 60 DTIE, USAEC, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
------- |