SWRHLQ6r
  FINAL REPORT OF OFF-SITE SURVEILLANCE
                       FOR
              PROJECT LONGSHOT
                      by the
    Southwestern Radiological Health Laboratory

   Department of Health, Education, and Welfare
               Public Health Service
      National Center for Radiological Health
                  December  1968
This surveillance performed under a Memorandum of
           Understanding (No. SF 54 373)
                      for the
       U. S. ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION

-------
                         LEGAL NOTICE

This report was prepared as an account of Government sponsored
work.  Neither the United States, nor the Atomic Energy Commission,
nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission:

A.  makes any warranty or representation, expressed or implied,
with respect to the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of the in- '
formation contained in this  report,  or that the use of any information,
apparatus, method, or process disclosed in this report may not  in-
fringe  privately owned rights; or

B.  assumes any liabilities with respect to the  use of, or for damages
resulting from the use of any informa|;ion, apparatus, method, or pro-
cess disclosed in  this report.

As used  in the above, "person acting pn behalf  of the Commission"
includes any employee or contractor of the Commission,  or  employee
of such contractor,  to the extent that |»uch employee or contractor of
the Commission,  or employee of  such contractor prepares,  dissemin-
ates, or provides  access to, any  information pursuant to his employ-
ment or  contract with the Commission,  or his employment with such
contractor.
   003

-------
                                                SWRHL-6r
  FINAL REPORT OF OFF-SITE SURVEILLANCE
                       FOR
              PROJECT LONGSHOT
                       by the
    Southwestern Radiological Health Laboratory

    Department of Health, Education, and Welfare
               Public Health {Service
      National Center for Radiological Health
                  December 1968
         Copy No. 3

         Dr. S.  C.  Black, Bioenvironmental
         Research, SWRHL, Las Vegas,  Nevada
This surveillance performed under a Memorandum of
           Understanding (No.  SF 54 373)
                      for the
       U. S. ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION

-------
                         INTRODUCTION

Project Longshot was an underground nuclear experiment conducted
on Amchitka Island in the Aleutian Island Chain, on October 29,  1965
at 1100 hours AST.
Part of the Vela Uniform series,  Project Longshot was designed to
gather additional information on seisrnic waves generated by an  under
ground nuclear detonation.
Under a Memorandum of Under standing between the U. S. Atomic
Energy Commission (AEC) and the U. S.  Public Health Service (PHS)
the PHS conducted a program of radiological monitoring and environ-
mental sampling along the Aleutian Island Chain, and at selected loca-
tions  on the Alaskan mainland.

-------
                  I.  OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES

A.  EXTERNAL MEASUREMENTS
    1.   Ground  Monitors
    On the day of the event, nine monitors were standing by at the
    locations listed in Table 1.
    Additionally,  one PHS staff member was at the Amchitka control
    point and three  PHS personnel were airborne in the Amchitka
    area.  A PHS Medical Officer was stationed on a U. S. Coast
    Guard cutter which was patrolling in the vicinity of Amchitka
    Island.
    Each monitor was equipped with aa Eberline E-500B  survey in-
    strument and a  Victoreen Radector Model AGB-50B-SR.
    The Eberline E-500B has a range of 0 to 200 milliroentgens per
    hour (mR/hr) gamma and beta-gamma detection in four scales
    with an external halogen filled GM tube and a 0 to 2000 mR/hr
    gamma only range from an internal Anton 302 tube.
    The Radector has a range of 0. 05 to 50, 000 mR/hr gamma  and
    beta-gamma on two scales.  This instrument employs an inert
    gas ionization chamber.  Errors associated with readings from
    these instruments are on the order of +20%.

    Table 1.  Ground monitor locations, Project Longshot.
      Location                          Number of People
    Adak Is land                                1
    Shemyc Island                             1
    St. Paul Island                             1
    Anchorage, Alaska                         6

-------
2.   Aerial Cloud Tracking
Aerial cloud tracking was performed by a USAF C-54 aircraft
and crew with a three man PHS monitoring team.
Instrumentation for monitoring included two Precision Model 111
Standard "Scintillators", two Ebi?rline E-500B1 s and two Victoreen
Radectors.  The probe of one of the Eberline instruments was
mounted in the hole below the calpin compartment in such a  way
that there was only one layer of .airplane "skin" below it.  The
other instruments were mounted inside the cabin of the aircraft.
In addition to the survey instruments,  a multichannel pulse height
analyzer was installed in the forward portion of the cargo com-
partment.  This  system included a multiscaler read-out on a
strip chart and a single channel analyzer with a sealer read-out.
The detector used was  a  3- by 3-inch Nal(Tl) crystal with a
3-inch photomultiplier tube.

3.   Film Badges and Dosimeters
On thp day of the event, sixteen EG&G thermoluminescent dosim-
eters {TLD) and  25 DuPont 555 film badges were placed  at three
film badge stations or worn by t^n PHS personnel.  (See Table 2)
The DuPont type 555 film is accurate to 4-50% in the 30 to 100 mR
range, and +10% in the 100 to 2000 mR range.  The lower limit of
detectability is 30 mR.
The EG&G Model 2 ThermolumiDescent Dosimeter  System is a
wide range gamma dosimeter system consisting of  the dosimeters,
and EG&G-designed electronic reader,  and a light standard for
system calibration.  The dosimeter  exposure is read out and
automatically recorded as a permanent chart record.

-------
    The TLD System is based on the thermoluminescent properties

    of manganese-activated calcium fluoride.  A layer of this mate-

    rial is bonded to a helical heater element which is positioned in

    an evacuated glass envelope.  The active material "stores" a

    small amount of the incident radiation by trapping electrons in

    the high energy levels.  The stored energy is released by heating

    the active material.  The released energy, in the form of light

    energy,  corresponds to the dose received and is converted into

    an electrical signal for the chart recorder  output record.

    Manufacturer's specifications fojf this system are as follows:

         Range                         5 mR - 5000 R

         Energy Independence           +10% from 60 Kev to 1, 3 Mev

         Accuracy                      +2 mR or 15% of scale read-
                                        ing, whichever is greater

         Output                         Graph on perforated 6 inch
                                        strip chart recorder


Table 2. Dosimeter and film badge locations.
Location
Adak
Shemya
St. Paul
Anchorage
Total
No. of
Badges
7
6
6
6
Total No. at Film
Number of Badge Station
Dosimeters ^
Badges TLD
2
4
4
6
5
5
5
0
0
3
3
0
Number Worn
by Personnel
Badges TLD
2
1
1
6
2
1
1
6

-------
B.  ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLING
    1.   Air Sampling
    On the day of the event, 19 Gelman "Tempest" air  samplers were
    operating at locations listed in Table 3 and shown on Figure 1.
    Also shown in Figure 1 are the permanent sampling stations of
    the Radiation Surveillance Network administered by the PHS in
    Washington, D.C.
    The "Tempest" air sampler used by the SWRHL employs a Cast
    Model 1550 vacuum pump driven by a General Electric 1/2 horse-
    power motor.  The pump runs at 1440 rpm and draws an  average
    flow rate of approximately 10 cfm.
    The sampler is equipped to use  ^ 4-inch diameter filter paper and
    an MSA  charcoal cartridge.   Thei Air Surveillance  Network employs
    Whatman 541 filter paper for routine air sampling.  The  total
    volume of air sampled is calculated from an average vacuum
    reading  (which in turn indicates 1;he average flow rate) and the
    total time of sampling.
    All air sample prefilters and charcoal cartridges were returned
    to the'Southwestern Radiological Health Laboratory in Las Vegas
    for radiological analyses.  Prefilters were  counted for gross
    beta activity in a Beckman "Wide Beta" low background (6 + 1 cpm
    beta) proportional system -which has an efficiency of approximately
    45%  for  0.54 Mev betas.  After  an initial count, if no significant
    activi :y  was detected, the prefilters were counted  at 5 and 12
    days after collection.
    All charcoal cartridges were analyzes. j.or gross gamma  only,
    and  the results compared with normal background  cartridges col-
    lected at Las Vegas.

-------
Table 3.  Air sampler locations and operating periods.

Days

Operating
10/18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29

30
31
11/1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9



0)


X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X













0}

Anchor ag
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X

X
X












Bethel




X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
S
X
X
X











It)
T)
1— 1
0
O

X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
HO
X
X
X
X
X









Cordova




X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
T
X
X










fl
G
Dillingha



X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
DA
X
X
X
X







*•<
o
*,
Dutch Ha:
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Y
X













Homer

X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
-
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X


C!
Ketchikai


X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
OC














Nome



X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
TO
X
X
X
X
X









Palmer
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X

GO
?H
Petersbu


X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
BER
X
X









X











a
0)
13
• |H

-------
                                                     Q TEMPEST AIR SAMPLER


                                                     A PERMANENT R.S.N. STATIONS
                      QQPALMER
                          ANCHORAGE
                         lin-approx. I40miles
Figure 1.  Air sampling station locations, Project Longshot.

-------
    2.   Milk,  Water and Vegetation Samples
    No milk, water or vegetation samples were collected specifically
    for this event.
                     II.  PUBLIC RELATIONS

An extensive public relations  program was carried out in the two
weeks  prior to Project Longshot.
Off-site personnel made appearances  before civic groups, and movie
exhibitions and informal discussions were conducted on mainland
Alaska.  In addition,  closed circuit television interviews were held
at military installations on several of the Aleutian Islands.
                          in.  RESULTS

All radioactivity was completely contained during Project Longshot.
No prefilters or charcoal cartridges showed any values above back-
ground levels.  All TLD's were within background ranges, and all
the film budges processed showed no exposures above the limits of
detectability.
                       IV.  CONCLUSIONS

Project Longshot produced no radioactive exposure to any off-site
resident.
                                 8

-------
                              DISTRIBUTION

 1-15   Southwestern Radiological Health Lab. ,  Las Vegas, Nevada
     16   Robert E. Miller,  Manager, NVOO/AEC, Las Vegas,  Nevada
     17   R. H. Thalgott,  Test Manager, NVOO/AEC,  Las Vegas, Nevada
     18   Henry G.  Vermillion, NVOO/AEC, Las  Vegas,  Nevada
     19   Chief, NOB/DASA, NVOO/AEC, Las Vegas, Nevada
     20   D. H. Edwards,  NVOO/AEC,  Las Vegas, Nevada
     21   D.  W. Hendricks, NVOO/AEC, Las Vegas, Nevada
     22   Mail jft Records, NVOO/AEC,  Lpis Vegas, Nevada
     23   Martin B. Biles, DOS, USAEC,  Washington,  D.  C.
     24   Director,  DMA,  USAEC, Washington, D.  C.
     25   John !5. Kelly, DPNE, USAEC, Washington, D. C.
     26   P. Allen,  ARL/ESSA, NVOO/AEC, Las Vegas,  Nevada
     27   Gilbert J. Ferber, ARL/ESSA, (Silver Springs, Maryland
28 - 32   Charles L. Weaver,  BRH ,  PHfii,  Rockville,  Maryland
     33   Clifford E. Nelson, Region IX, PHS, San Francisco, Calif.
     34   Bernd Kahn, BRH, RATSEC, Cipcinnati, Ohio
     35   Northeastern Radiological Health Lab. ,  Winchester, Mass.
     36   Southeastern Radiological Health Lab. ,  Montgomery,  Alabama
     37   W. C. King, LRL, Mercury, Nevada
     38   John W. Gofman, LRL,  Livermore, California
     39   H. J.  Reynolds,  LRL, Livermore, California
     40   Roger Batzel,  LRL,  Livermore,  California
     41   Ed Fleming, LRL, Livermore, California
     42   Wm. E. Ogle, LASL, Los Alamos, New Mexico
     43   Harry S.  Jordan, LASL,  Los Alamos, New Mexico
     44  Victor M. Milligan, REECo,  Mercury, Nevada
     45   Clinton S. Maupin, REECo. ,  Mercury,  Nevada
     46   Byron Murphey,  Sandia Corporation, Albuquerque, New Mexico
47 - 48   DTIE, Oak Ridge,  Tennessee

-------