SWRHL-20r
OFF-SITE SURVEILLANCE ACTIVITIES OF THE
SOUTHWESTERN RADIOLOGICAL HEALTH LABORATORY
from January through June 1964
by the
Southwestern Radiological Health Laboratory
U. S. Public Health Service
Department of Health, Education, and Welfare
Las Vegas, Nevada
January 24, 1966
This surveillance performed under a Memorandum of
Understanding (No. SF 54 373)
for the
U. S. ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION
-------
LEGAL NOTICE
This report was prepared as an account of Government-sponsored
work. Neither the United States, nor the Atomic Energy Commission,
nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission:
A. Makes any warranty or representation, expressed or implied,
with respect to the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of the
information contained in this report, or that the use of any infor-
mation, apparatus, method, or process disclosed in this report
may not infringe privately owned rights; or
B. Assumes any liabilities with respect to the use of, or for dam-
ages resulting from the use of any information, apparatus, method,
or process disclosed in this report.
As used in the above, "person acting on behalf of the Commission" in-
cludes any employee or contractor of the Commission, or employee of
such contractor, to the extent that such employee or contractor of the
Commission, or employee of such contractor prepares, disseminates,
or provides access to, any information pursuant to his employment or
contract with the Commission, or his employment with such contractor.
90
-------
SWRHL-20r
OFF-SITE SURVEILLANCE ACTIVITIES OF THE
SOUTHWESTERN RADIOLOGICAL HEALTH LABORATORY
from January through June 1964
by the
Southwestern Radiological Health Laboratory
U. S. Public Health Service
Department of Health, Education, and Welfare
Las Vegas, Nevada
August 4, 1966
Second Printing
This surveillance performed under a Memorandum of
Understanding (No. SF 54 373)
for the
U. S. ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION
-------
ABSTRACT
The Southwestern Radiological Health Laboratory of the U. S. Public
Health Service performed off-site radiological surveillance for
thirteen announced events and four reactor experiments during the
period from January through June 1964. This surveillance is con-
ducted in the public areas surrounding the Nevada Test Site under a
Memorandum of Understanding with the U* S. Atomic Energy Com-
mission.
During the six month period, one nuclear event and three reactor
experiments released radioactivity which was detected off-site. The
majority of surveillance effort was directed toward the Pike Event,
an underground nuclear detonation conducted on March 13 which
/
vented and released radioactivity into off-site populated areas.
; ' \ . (. r '
Approximately 1450 various environmental samples were collected
and analyzed following this event.
Analysis of all sampling and surveillance performed during the six
month period indicates that the safety criteria established by the
Atomic Energy Commission for the off-site population were not ex-
ceeded by any one or combination of detonations or reactor experi-
ments during £he period January through June 1964.
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ABSTRACT X
TABLE OF CONTENTS "
LIST OF TABLES m
I. INTRODUCTION 1
II. OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES 2
A. GROUND MONITORING 2
B. DOSE RATE RECORDERS 2
C. AERIAL CLOUD TRACKING 3
D. AERIAL SAMPLING 3
E. AIR SAMPLING 3
F. MILK AND WATER SAMPLING 4
G. VEGETATION SAMPLING 4
H. FILM BADGES 4
I. PUBLIC RELATIONS 5
J. MEDICAL AND VETERINARIAN SERVICES 5
K. BIOENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH 6
in. ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES 7
A. AIR FILTERS 7
B. CHARCOAL CARTRIDGES 7
C. ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES 8
1. Milk 8
2. Vegetation 9
IV. RESULTS 10
A. UNDERGROUND TESTS 10
B. REACTOR EXPERIMENTS . ?
J. i-i
1. Tory H-C -^ ?
2. Kiwi B4D ^
C. SIX-MONTH SUMMARY 14
V. CONCLUSIONS 1?
APPENDIX
DISTRIBUTION
ii
-------
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1. Ten highest air sample results following the Pike
Event, 3/13/64. 11
Table 2. Results of air samples collected following the
Tory II-C full power test, May 20, 1964, in pCi/m3
at end of collection. 15
Table 3. Results of air samples collected following the
Kiwi B4D full power test, May 13, 1964, in pCi/m3
at end of collection. 15
in
-------
I. INTRODUCTION
During the period January through June 1964, thirteen announced under
ground nuclear tests were conducted by the U. S. Atomic Energy Com-
mission at their Nevada Test Site as a part of Operation Niblick. In
addition, four reactor experiments were conducted in May 1964 on the
Nuclear Rocket Development Station. The U. S. Public Health Service
carried out a program of radiological surveillance of the public areas
off site for the Operational Safety Division of the AEC's Nevada Oper-
ations Office under a Memorandum of Understanding between the U. S.
Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) and the U. S. Public Health Service
(PHS).
The Off-Site Radiological Safety Program of the Southwestern Radio-
logical Health Laboratory (SWRHL) conducted its program of radio-
logical monitoring and environmental sampling in the off-site areas
surrounding the restricted area enclosed within the Nevada Test Site
and the Nellis Air Force Range. This overall complex of the Nevada
Test Site (NTS) and the Nellis Air Force Range (NAFR) includes the
Nuclear Rocket Development Station (NRDS) and the Tonopha Test
Range (TTR) and for simplicity will be called the test range complex
throughout this report. Although routine sampling and monitoring was
done within a 300-mile radius around the test range complex, surveil-
lance was extended as necessary to provide adequate coverage.
This report describes the methods and equipment used and summarizes
the data collected during the six month period.
-------
II. OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES
A. GROUND MONITORING
Mobile monitoring teams were deployed in the off-site area before
each event to locations most likely to be affected by a release of ra-
dioactive material. If a release did occur, the teams conducted a
ground monitoring program directed from Control Point headquarters
via two-way radio communications. Ground monitoring continued
until activity levels became too low to necessitate further monitoring.
Each monitor was equipped with an Eberline E-500B, a Precision
Model 111 Standard "Scintillator", a Beckman MX-5, and a Tracerlab
AN/PDR TIB. The Eberline E-500B has a range of 0 to 200 milli -
roentgens per hour (mR/hr) gamma and beta-gamma detection in four
scales with an external halogen filled GM tube and a 0 to 2000 mR/hr
range from an internal Anton 302 tube. The Precision Model 111
Standard "Scintillator" was used primarily for low level detection
since it provides a range of 0 to 5 mR/hr in six scales. The Beck-
man MX-5 instrument has a range of 0 to 20 mR/hr in three scales.
It is equipped with an external Geiger tube with a sliding beta shield.
The Tracerlab AN/PDR TIB has a range of 0.05 to 50,000 mR/hr in
five scales. This instrument employs an air ionization chamber de-
tector. These instruments are accurate to +20%, and readings can be
taken to two significant figures.
B. DOSE RATE RECORDERS
To supplement the ground monitoring program, Eberline RM-11 dose
rate recorders were utilized to document cloud passages at fixed loca-
tions, thereby allowing mobile monitoring teams to continue following
the release as it moved through the off-site area. These recorders
-------
utilize a Geiger tube detector and operate on 110 V AC. They have a
0.01 to 100 mR/hr range and are accurate to +20%. Gamma dose rate
is recorded on a 30-hour strip chart.
C. AERIAL CLOUD TRACKING
A PHS aerial monitoring team was available for each experiment. In
the event of a radioactive release, this team, equipped with instruments
identical to those used by ground monitors, tracked the effluent. Nor-
mally an Air Force U3-A aircraft and a PHS Aero-Commander were
used in this tracking mission.
Aerial cloud tracking is essentially used to detect relative radiation
intensities and to indicate cloud position, speed and direction. The
information thus obtained is utilized to position ground monitors to
insure comprehensive ground coverage and subsequently better sur-
veillance.
D. AERIAL SAMPLING
The aerial sampling program was performed by the Engineering Devel-
opment Program of the Southwestern Radiological Health Laboratory.
The program used two C-45 aircraft for cloud sampling activities.
Cloud samples were collected by cryogenic, electrostatic precipitator,
and mass air sampling techniques. The methods developed have re-
sulted in measurements of cloud inventories which have been reason-
ably consistent with determinations made by other organizations.
E. AIR SAMPLING
The air samplers used were a high volume turbine type impeller pow-
ered by an electric motor. The sampler was equipped with a special
sampling head designed to accommodate a Gelman type E, 8"x 10"
glass fiber filter and an MSA activated charcoal cartridge. Normal
-------
air
ir flow with a glass fiber filter in place is approximately 45 to bU
cubic feet per minute (cfm) and approximately 25 to 35 cfm with both
filter and cartridge in place. Approximately thirty permanent air
sampling stations were in operation on a twenty-four hour basis.
Portable generators were carried by ground monitoring teams, so
that in the event of a radioactive release from a test, remote or spe-
cific "in-cloud" air samples could be obtained.
F. MILK AND WATER SAMPLING
The previously established milk sampling program from both commer-
cial dairies and private producers continued throughout the six month
period. Thirty-one sources -were routinely sampled during this peri-
od, most on a monthly basis. A total of 146 samples were collected
from these locations. In the event of cloud passage over a specific
area, intensified sampling within the area was conducted to document
changes in activity.
Water samples were collected on a routine basis, unless circumstances
dictated specific source sampling. Both potable and nonpotable water
supplies were sampled. During this period approximately 285 water
samples were collected from 48 sources. Most of these sources are
sampled on a monthly basis.
G. VEGETATION SAMPLING
Normally, vegetation samples were collected only in the event of a
release of radioactive material. The analytical results of these sam-
ples were used to delineate the fallout pattern.
H. FILM BADGES
Approximately two hundred residents in the off-site area wore film
badge dosimeters throughout this period. These film badges were
-------
changed each month and were processed by the Radiation Safety Depart-
ment of Reynolds Electrical and Engineering Company, Inc. Approx-
imately seventy-five station badges were also utilized to provide more
complete coverage. The badge used is made up of DuPont type 555
film. Dose, as determined from this film, is accurate to +50% in the
20 to 100 mR range and +10% in the 100 to 2000 mR range.
I. PUBLIC RELATIONS
Frequent contacts with the off-site population, schools and civic groups
provided the opportunity to explain the role of the Public Health Service
with respect to the programs of the Atomic Energy Commission. Lec-
tures and films dealing with elementary atomic physics, radiation ef-
fects, atomic testing, and the safeguards exercised to protect the public
were presented. As a result of favorable public relations, a number of
offrgite residents took part in the environmental sampling program; all
routine sampling stations except Las Vegas were operated by local cit-
izens, and many people volunteered to wear film badge dosimeters.
J. MEDICAL AND VETERINARIAN SERVICES
The Public Health Service has been requested by the Atomic Energy
Commission to include at least one Medical Officer on its staff. This
Medical Officer is responsible for maintaining liaison with local physi-
cians, answering inquiries on the medical effects of radiation, investi-
gating all cases of alleged radiation injury, and conducting meetings
for various groups who wish t;o know about biological effects of radia-
tion.
An Army Veterinarian assigned to the NVOO, AEC. was available to
the Public Health Service Off-Site Radiological Safety Program. Vet-
erinarian services were also provided by a PHS Veterinarian. Liaison
was maintained with livestock producers in the area and the program
-------
of wildlife and cattle investigation was continued. Semi-annual slaugh-
ter of cattle from the NTS herd and the Knoll Creek and Delamar Valley
herds was accomplished in cooperation with the University of Nevada.
Specimens from these animals were analyzed for radionuclide content.
K. BIG-ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH
Another program of the Southwestern Radiological Health Laboratory
is Bioenvironmental Research. The mission of this program is, in
part, to investigate the inter-relationships among the levels of radio-
nuclide contamination of air, soil, water; vegetation and milk.
i
Following the Pike Event, radioiodine studies were conducted at two
Las Vegas dairy farms.
-------
III. ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
A. AIR FILTERS
All 8"x 10" glass fiber filters were counted for gross beta activity in a
thin window, large area proportional probe connected to a high speed
sealer. This system has an efficiency of approximately 30% for 1. 5
Mev betas and background for the system is approximately 600 cpm.
All samples were counted as soon as possible after collection, and ac-r
tivity levels were computed at time of count for the purpose of screen-
ing samples and delineating the cloud pattern. These samples were
then stored for five days to allow natural activity to decay. They were
recounted at this time and again seven days later. Activity levels
were then recomputed from these two later counts.
Samples with high levels of gross beta activity were recounted frequently
to obtain a decay curve. The curve obtained was then analyzed for best
fit to the general equation y=ax . Based on an analysis of decay curves,
it was found that a T" ' ° relationship existed with a mean error of 4%.
This relationship was then used to correct all samples with high activ-
ity to end of collection.
B. CHARCOAL CARTRIDGES
All cartridges were gamma scanned by placement directly on a 4"x 4"
sodium iodide crystal coupled to a 400 channel analyzer set to view
energies from 0 to 2 Mev. Assuming no break in the prefilter, the acT
tivity on the cartridge should represent essentially only gaseous fission
products. Detection efficiency for this geometry is about 18% at 0. 51
Mev. The minimum detectable activity is taken to be about 200 pCi
total with this system.
-------
The reported values (pCi/m3) assume average concentration over each
entire sampling period.
C. ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES
1. Milk
Milk samples were collected on a routine has s throughout the six
month period. In the event of a release, additional milk samples
were collected from locations within the suspect* d trajectory.
These samples represented dairies, dairy farms and farms pro-
ducing milk for home consumption only.
All milk samples were counted in 3.5 liter, inverted well alumi-
num beakers which were placed on top of a 4"x 4" crystal coupled
to a 400 channel pulse height analyzer. The detection efficiency
for l 311 is 5. 3% utilizing the 0. 364 Mev photopeak. A matrix tech-
nique is employed to compensate for the interference due to the
presence of other isotopes. The input to this matrix is variable
allowing for the simultaneous determination of any eight nuclides
for which efficiencies and interference factors have been obtained.
Actual computation is performed by an IBM 1620 computer.
The lower detection limit for milk samples was about 20 pCi/1
(equal to the 2 sigma error) at time of count and all results below
that value are reported as not detectable. The error associated
with positive values is about -f20 pCi/1 or 10% whichever is greater.
All reported values are corrected to collection time.
Chemical analysis for 8 9Sr and 90Sr was also performed on selected
samples, as determined by the presence of l 1 I or where back-
ground information was needed for a location no' previously sam-
pled. The minimum detectable quantity of 90Sr ;s 1 pC;/I.
Strontium-89 is determined on the calculated difference between
-------
90Sr and total radio strontium; due to analytical errors, values
are reported to the nearest 5 pCi/1, with values of less than five
reported as not detectable.
2. Vegetation
As soon as information was available to determine the trajectory
of a release, vegetation samples were collected to identify the
fallout pattern. Depending upon sample size, these samples were
packed either into aluminum beakers or 400 ml plastic containers
and were gamma scanned by the system described above.
-------
IV. RESULTS
A. UNDERGROUND TESTS
One of the thirteen announced events resulted in a release of radioac-
tive effluent that was detected in the off-site populated areas. This
Was ^he Pike Event of March 13 which will be discussed below. A
second event, Oconto, detonated January 23, 1964, released a small
,amount of gaseous fresh fission products during sample recovery on
drill-back operations. The release consisted primarily of inert gases
and was detected by aerial sampling in the vicinity of Tempiute on
Highway 25. The maximum concentrations of xenon -within the gas
cloud at this point were estimated to be 840 picocuries of xenon-133
per standard cubic meter and 33,000 picocuries of xenon-135 per
standard cubic meter. This event produced no measurable radiation
dose to off-site personnel and -was not detectable at ground level off
site.
The Pike Event resulted in a release of radioactive effluent that was
detected by various sampling techniques as far south as Yuma, Ari-
zona. Maximum ground monitoring readings were relatively low (less
than 10 mR/hr net gamma). Those areas in the cloud path experienced
small but detectable residual contamination on vegetation and in some
milk supplies. No environmental sampler contained activity levels
in excess of the radiation protection guides for general population ex-
posure. Maximum total whole body exposures to gross gamma radia-
tion as a result of this event were less than 55 mR infinite dose.
The ten highest air sample results from the Pike Event are shown in
Table 1.
10
-------
Table 1. Ten highest air sample results following the Pike Event, 3/13/64.
1. LOCATION DATA
STATION NAME
On Hwy. 95, 5 mi. W
of Cactus Springs
Cactus Springs
Indian Springs
2760 Highland Drive
Las Vegas, Nev.
Nye County Line and
Hwy. 95, 12 mi. W
of Cactus Springs
Cactus Springs
On Hwy. 95, 5 mi. W
of Cactus Springs
104 W. Charleston,
Las Vegas, Nev.
Nye County Line and
Hwy. 95, 12 mi. W
of Cactus Springs
II. COLLECTION DATA
w
Ǥ-
^s
49
91
77
99
155
162
79
85
210
53
SAMPLING PERIOD
BEGIN
Mo.
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Day
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
Time
0910
0840
0852
1106
1140
0852
1128
1210
1450
1245
END
Ma.
3
3
3
3
3
-
3
3
3
3
3
Day
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
Time
1010
1120
1102
1530
1445
1228
1503
1522
1845
15:03
COLLECTOR
FC
FC
FC
FC
FC
FC
FC
FC
FC
FC
III. RADIOASSAY DATA
GROSS BETA COUNT
DATE -TIME
COUNTED
13-1515
13-1512
13-1521
13-1635
13-1457
13-1516
13-1706
13-1704
13-2221
13-1705
ACTIVITY
(PCi/m3)
76,000*
#
50,000*
35,000
15,000
14^ 000
10,000
9,000
1,400
680
460
GAMMA PULSE HEIGHT ANALYSIS
DATE -TIME
COUNTED
13-2040
13-1625
13-1620
13-1645
13-1620
13-1605
13-19LG
13-1830
13-2100
13-1830
ACTIVITY (pCi/m^)
1 33j 1 35 j
470 380
700 510
190 160
123 92
60 100
75 160
98 96
10 6
10 ND
5 10
* Sampler failed after approximately one hour's operation. Results calculated on this basis.
** The glass fiber filter showed the following concentrations (pCi/m3) 1S1I, 1000; 1JJI, 35,000.
ND - Not detected
F - Filter
C - Cartridge
-------
Radioiodine appeared in some samples of milk from individual farms;
however, none was found in commercially available milk at any loca-
tion sampled. Two hundred seventy-five samples of milk were col-
lected and analyzed from Arizona, New Mexico, Texas, California
and Nevada (excluding those samples taken for a special study in Las
Vegas, Nevada). Iodine-131 was found in milk from Yuma, Arizona
and at Bard, Blythe and Winterhaven, California with a peak concen-
tration of 80 pCi/1 detected in samples from Yuma and Winterhaven.
The results of milk samples collected following this event are listed
in Table 1 of the Appendix.
An experiment was conducted by the Bioenvironmental Research Pro-
gram at two Las Vegas dairy farms where six cows were supplied
with fresh green feed .(green chop). A maximum concentration of
420 pCi/1 of 1 31I was found in the milk from these six cows. The
.highest iodine concentration from a cow on dry feed was 70 pCi/1. Dry
feed is the normal diet for milk cows at this time of year in Las Vegas.
iOne hundred seventy-five milk samples were analyzed in conjunction
.with this experiment. The results of these samples are shown in
Table 2 of the Appendix.
No contamination of water supplies used for human consumption was
detected following the Pike Event.
None of the film badges collected in the off-site area following the Pike
Event indicated a result above the threshold exposure (20 mR).
B. REACTOR EXPERIMENTS
1. Tory II-C
On May 12 and May 20, 1964, the Tory II-C nuclear reactor was
tested at the Nevada Test Site at a location approximately 7. 7 miles
southwest of CP-1. The May 12 test, conducted at 1315 hours PDT,
12
-------
was an intermediate power test (sixty percent of design power).
The May 20 test was a full power test conducted at 1350 hours PDT.
The reactor was tested in a position such that the exhaust and es-
caping fission products were directed toward the north.
a. The Tory II-C Intermediate Power Run
Only one indication of activity off the test range complex was
found on May 12. This was a ground monitor's report of
0.02 mR/hr net gamma at 1617 hours PDT, at the junction
of Valley Road and State Highway 25. Readings above bapk-
ground at this location were detected in the time interval
1600 to 1645 hours PDT. A vegetation sample collected
from Gunderson's Ranch at 1700 hours PDT on May 12 indi-
cated no residual activity. Gunderson's Ranch is located
seven miles west northwest of the Highway 25-Valley Road
intersection.
b. The Tory II-C Full Power Run
The full power run yielded detectable radioactivity off the
test range complex. The maximum dose rate detected off T
site by ground monitoring was 0. 05 mR/hr net gamma.
Three of the air samples taken off the test range complex
contained fresh fission products. Iodine-133 was the only
isotope detected. Analyses of the prefiHers and charcoal
cartridges are presented in Table 2.
A milk sampling program was initiated following the Kiwi
B4D full power test (May \3, 1964). Twenty-five of the
samples in this program were taken following the May 20
Tory test. Although the presence of 1 31I was detected in
several samples taken following May 20, the contribution,
13
-------
if any, from the Tory test was indistinguishable from the
i Kiwi test. Comparison of air sampling results and effluent
trajectories of the Kiwi and the Tory tests tends to substan-
tiate the conclusion that milk contamination was a result of
the Kiwi test.
2. Kiwi B4D
On May 8, and May 13, 1964 the Kiwi B4D reactor was tested at
Test Cell C, located at the Nuclear Rocket Development Station,
Jackass.Flats, Nevada. The May 8 experiment was an interme-
diate power run (design power x 0. 001).and was a scaled down pro-
file of the full power test conducted on May 13. During the full
power test,,' the reactor was brought to design power at 1045 hours
and remained at that level-for sixty-four seconds. The reactor
was tested in an upright position so that the hydrogen coolant ex-
haulsted upward along with escaping fission products.
The intermediate power run yielded no detectable activity off site.
The full power run yielded activity in the off-site area. The only
populated locations at which dose rates above background were
detected were Diablo, where the peak net dose rate was 0.43 mR/hr
and Lund, -where the peak was 0. 028.;mR/hr.
Three of the air samples taken off site contained fresh fission pro-
ducts. Analyses of the prefilters and charcoal cartridges are pre-
sented in Table 3.
Milk samples collected from May 14 to 22 at several ranches indi-
cated the presence of r'adioiodine. (See Appendix, Table 5)
C. SIX -MONTH SUMMARY
The ten highest air filter results collected during the six month period
were taken during the Pike Event and are listed with the results from
that event.
14
-------
Table 2. Results of air samples collected following the Tory II-C full
power test, May 20, 1964, in pCi/m3 at end of collection.
Location
Goss Ranch
Adaven
Sunnyside
Date -Time
On Hours
(PDT)
5/20-1530
5/20-1745
5/20-1621
T-N rr,- o,, I/*,, Gamma Pulse Height
Date-Time 8"x 10" . . . 6
r^tt tr T-> r-n. Analysis -
Off Hours Prefilter _. ' . ,,
,_.T^rr,. _ _ Charcoal Cartridge
(PDT) Gross Beta 133 5
5/20-1713 1000
5/21-1000 2.3
5/21-1020 8.8
6.9
<1
-------
Samples of water collected during this period from sources used for
human consumption showed no fresh fission products. Approximately
285 samples from potable and nonpotable sources were collected dur-
ing this time.
The only milk samples showing fresh fission products were collected
subsequent to the Pike Event and the Kiwi B4D reactor run. All milk
samples collected and analyzed from January through June 1964 are
listed in the Appendix. Milk samples collected and analyzed on a
routine basis are listed in Table 4 of the Appendix.
Approximately 1500 film badges were collected and processed from
film badge stations and badged personnel in the off-site area. No ex-
posures above the 20 mR detection limit were found that could be attrib-
uted to any one or combination of the events of this period.
16
-------
V. CONCLUSIONS
Results obtained through environmental radiation surveillance during
this period indicate that no individual in the off-site area received an
exposure, resulting from Nevada Test Site operations, which exceeded
the guides established by the AEC and/or recommended by the FRC
and the NCR P.
17
-------
APPENDIX
Milk samples collected and analyzed from January through June 1964.
Table 1. Results of milk samples collected following the
Pike Event (activity extrapolated to time of col-
lection). 18
Table 2. Results of raw milk samples collected following
the Pike Event (activity extrapolated to time of
collection). 38
Table 3. Results of milk samples collected following
Shoal. 50
Table 4. Results of routine milk sampling.
Table 5. Results of milk samples collected following
Kiwi B4D.
51
55
Note 1. Table 3 showing milk samples collected following Project
Shoal (detonated October 26, 1963 near Fallen, Nevada)
contains only those samples collected during 1964. The
majority of milk samples collected following Project Shoal
were processed during 1963 and can be found in "Final Re-
port of Off-Site Surveillance for Project Shoal" VUF-1009.
Note 2. In tables where the letters "A" and "B" appear, A= <10,
B= <5.
-------
Table 1, Results of milk samples collected following the Pike Event (activity extrapolated
to time of collection).
LOCATION
AJO ARIZ
AJO ARIZ
AJO ARIZ
AJO ARIZ
BUCKEYE ARIZ
BUCKEYE ARIZ
BUCKEYE ARIZ
BAGDAD ARIZ
BAGDAD
BAGDAD
BAGDAD
BAGDAD
CHI NO
CHI NO
CHI NO
CHINO VLLY
VLLY
VLLY
VLLY
VLLY
VLLY
VLLY
VLLY
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
VLLY ARIZ
VLLY
VLLY
CHINO
CHINO
CHINO
CHINO
CHINO
CHINO
CHINO
COTTONWOOD
COTTONWOOD
COTTONWOOD
EHRENBERG
EHRENBERG
EHRENBERG
EHRENBERG
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
ID
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
DATE
COLL
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
17
18
18
19
16
17
18
17
18
19
20
21
14
15
15
16
16
17
17
18
19
19
20
17
18
19
15
16
17
18
DATE
COUNT
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
19
18
21
21
17
19
21
19
21
21
21
21
16
18
18
18
18
17
18
19
19
23
23
18
19
21
16
16
18
19
I
131
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
PC/L
I
133
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
CS
137
30
25
25
25
20
25
30
30
25
25
15
15
95
40
40
40
40
50
50
50
40
40
40
20
20
15
55
15
35
10
-------
Table 1. Results of milk samples collected following the Pike Event (activity extrapolated
to time of collection), (continued)
LOCATION
EHRENBERG
EHRENBERG
KINGMAN
KINGMAN
KINGMAN
KINGMAN
KINGMAN
KINGMAN
KINGMAN
KINGMAN
PARKER
PARKER
PARKER
PARKER
PARKER
PARKER
PARKER
PHOENIX
PHOENIX
PHOENIX
PHOENIX
PHOENIX
PHOENIX
PHOENIX
PHOENIX
PHOENIX
PHOENIX
PHOENIX
DATE
N
RG ARIZ
RG ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
ID
F
F
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
D01
D01
D01
D01
D01
D01
D01
D01
F02
F02
F02
COLL
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
19
20
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
26
17
18
19
DATE
COUNT
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
20
22
15
15
17
18
19
20
25
23
16
18
19
20
21
25
23
14
17
17
17
18
21
21
31
17
19
20
I
131
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
PC/L
I
133
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
CS
137
30
20
30
35
25
30
25
20
20
35
65
55
50
40
50
45
55
25
20
20
20
20
40
25
20
30
25
70
-------
Table 1, Results of milk samples collected following the Pike Event (activity extrapolated
to time of collection), (continued)
DATE
LOCATION
PHOENIX ARIZ
PHOENIX ARIZ
PHOENIX ARIZ
PHOENIX ARIZ
TEMPE ARIZ
TEMPE ARIZ
TEMPE ARIZ
TEMPE ARIZ
TEMPE ARIZ
TEMPE ARIZ
TEMPE ARIZ
TEMPE ARIZ
TEMPE ARIZ
TEMPE ARIZ
TEMPE ARIZ
TEMPE ARIZ
TEMPE ARIZ
TEMPE ARIZ
TEMPE ARIZ
TEMPE ARIZ
TEMPE ARIZ
TEMPE ARIZ
TEMPE ARIZ
TUCSON ARIZ
TUCSON ARIZ
TUCSON ARIZ
TUCSON ARIZ
TUCSON ARIZ
TUCSON ARIZ
TUCSON ARIZ
TUCSON ARIZ
ID
F03
F03
F03
F03
D02
D02
D02
D02
D02
D02
D02
D02
D03
D03
D03
D03
D03
D03
F01
FOI
FOI
FOI
FOI
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
COLL
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
14
16
17
18
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
26
14
15
16
17
18
19
14
16
17
18
19
17
18
18
18
19
19
20
26
DATE
COUNT
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
14
17
19
21
14
17
17
17
19
21
21
30
14
17
17
17
19
21
14
17
17
19
21
17
19
19
19
21
21
21
31
I
131
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
PC/L
I
133
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
CS
137
25
20
20
15
30
20
20
30
50
40
30
25
40
20
20
20
40
35
20
25
30
90
70
20
20
80
35
40
40
ND
ND
-------
Table 1. Results of milk samples collected following the Pike Event (activity extrapolated
to time of collection), (continued)
LOCATION ID
WENDEN ARIZ F
WICKENBURG ARIZ F
WIKIEUP ARIZ F
WIKIEUP ARIZ F
WIKIEUP ARIZ
YUMA
YUMA
YUMA
YUMA
YUMA
YUMA
YUMA
YUMA
YUMA
YUMA
YUMA
YUMA
YUMA
YUMA
YUMA
YUMA
YUMA
YUMA
YUMA
YUMA
YUMA
YUMA
YUMA
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
F
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
FOl
F01
FOl
FOl
FOl
FOl
FOl
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
DATE
COLL
03 18
03 19
03 17
03 20
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
04
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
04
21
16
18
19
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
30
02
17
18
19
21
22
23
24
25
27
28
01
DATE
COUNT
03 19
03 20
03 19
03 21
03 21
03 17
03 18
03 19
03 25
03 24
03 24
03 25
03 26
03 30
03 30
04 02
04 03
03 17
03 18
03 19
03 25
03 24
03 25
03 25
03 26
03 30
04 01
04 03
I
131
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
30
ND
ND
ND
30
50
ND
80
60
ND
40
40
ND
30
ND
PC/L
I
133
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
CS
137
30
30
20
15
15
15
20
30
ND
15
20
ND
ND
10
5
15
10
10
15
20
20
15
ND
ND
ND
10
ND
5
-------
Table 1. Results of milk samples collected following the Pike Event (activity extrapolated
to time of collection), (continued)
LOCATION
BARD CAL
BARD CAL
BARD CAL
BARD CAL
BARD CAL
BARD CAL
BARD CAL
BARD CAL
BARD CAL
BARD CALIF
BLYTHE CAL
BLYTHE CAL
BLYTHE CAL
BLYTHE CAL
BLYTHE CAL
BLYTHE CAL
BLYTHE CAL
BLYTHE CAL
BLYTHE CAL
BRAWLY CAL
INDIO CAL
WINTERHAVEN CAL
WINTERHAVEN CAL
WINTERHAVEN CAL
WINTERHAVEN CAL
WINTERHAVEN CAL
WINTERHAVEN CAL
WINTERHAVEN CAL
WINTERHAVEN CAL
DATE
ID
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
FOl
F01
FOl
FOl
FOl
FOl
FOl
FOl
F02
D
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
COLL
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
19
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
28
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
24
26
18
19
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DATE
COUNT
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
04
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
04
20
20
25
25
24
24
25
26
30
01
16
18
19
20
21
25
24
25
30
19
20
25
24
24
25
26
30
30
01
I
131
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
50
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
30
20
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
20
ND
40
50
20
80
PC/L
I
133
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
CS
137
40
20
10
25
15
10
15
5
20
20
ND
25
35
20
20
ND
ND
ND
15
15
20
15
20
25
20
20
20
25
35
-------
Table ! Results of milk samples collected following the Pike Event (activity extrapolated
to time of collection), (continued)
DATE
LOCATION
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
VEGAS
VE6AS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
ID
D03
D03
D03
D03
D03
D03
D03
DOS
D03
D03
D03
D03
D03
D04
D04
D04
D04
D04
D04
D04
D04
D04
D04
D04
D04
D04
DOS
D06
COLL
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
16
17
17
18
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
16
17
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
17
17
DATE
COUNT
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
16
17
17
19
19
19
21
21
23
24
25
26
30
16
17
17
19
19
21
21
23
24
25
26
30
31
17
17
I
131
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
'i~J
NO
ND
ND
ND
PC/L
I
133
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
CS
137
105
130
90
135
75
130
100
150
110
115
125
125
105
80
50
30
95
80
70
85
100
85
85
75
80
65
65
65
-------
Table 1. Results of milk samples collected following the Pike Event (activity extrapolated
to time of collection), (continued)
PC/L
I I CS
131 133 137
DATE
LOCATION
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
ID
DOT
D07
DOT
DOT
007
D07
D07
D07
007
007
D07
DOS
COLL
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
16
18
16
17
19
20
21
23
25
26
27
17
DATE
COUNT
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
16
19
16
17
19
21
21
24
26
30
31
17
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
90
105
95
90
90
80
80
80
75
75
75
130
-------
Table 1. Results of milk samples collected following the Pike Event (activity extrapolated
to time of collection), (continued)
PC/L
DATE DATE I I CS
LOCATION ID COLL COUNT 131 133 137
LATHROP WLS NEV F
MOAPA NEV F
MOAPA NEV F
MOAPA NEV F
MOAPA NEV F
MOAPA NEV F
MOAPA NEV F
MOAPA NEV F
MOAPA NEV F
MOAPA NEV F
MOAPA NEV F
OVERTON NEV F
OVERTON NEV F
OVERTON NEV F
OVERTON NEV F
OVERTON NEV F
OVERTON NEV F
OVERTON NEV F
OVERTON NEV F
PAHRUMP NEV F
PAHRUMP NEV F
PAHRUMP NEV F
PAHRUMP NEV F
PAHRUMP NEV F
PAHRUMP NEV F
PAHRUMP NEV F
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
18
14
15
15
16
16
17
18
18
19
20
15
15
16
16
17
17
18
19
14
14
15
15
16
16
17
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
19
15
15
16
16
17
17
18
18
19
21
15
16
16
17
17
18
18
19
15
15
15
17
18
17
18
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
55
120
125
125
110
65
65
135
135
130
125
85
95
85
60
60
105
105
95
30
40
35
30
35
30
35
-------
Table 1. Results of milk samples collected following the Pike Event (activity extrapolated
to time of collection), (continued)
LOCATION
ID
ALAMOGORDO N M
ALAMOGORDO N M
ALAMOGORDO N M
ALAMOGORDO N M
ARTESIA N M
ARTES1A N M
ARTESIA N M
ARTESIA N M
CARLSBAD N M
CARLSBAD N M
CARLSBAD N M
CARLSBAD N M
CARLSBAD N M
CARLSBAD N M
CARLSBAD N M
CARLSBAD N M
CARLSBAD N M
EUNICE N M
EUNICE N M
GILA N M
GILA N M
GILA N M
LAS CRUCES N M
LAS CRUCES N M
LAS CRUCES N M
LAS VEGAS N M
LOVING N M
ROSWELL N M
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
DATE
COLL
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
16
18
19
20
16
18
19
20
13
16
17
17
18
19
19
20
24
17
19
16
18
19
17
18
20
18
13
16
DATE
COUNT
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
04
03
18
18
20
21
17
19
20
21
16
17
18
18
19
19
20
21
30
18
21
17
19
22
18
20
21
19
08
18
I
131
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
PC/L
I
133
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
CS
137
80
40
40
70
40
65
50
40
45
45
40
45
50
60
60
45
30
105
40
20
55
55
45
40
40
125
145
70
-------
Table 1. Results of milk samples collected following the Pike Event (activity extrapolated
to time of collection), (continued)
LOCATION ID
ROSWELL N M D
ROSWELL N M D
ROSWELL N M D
ROSWELL N M D
TUCUMCARI N M D
WHITES CITY NMD
WHITES CITY NMD
WHITES CITY N M D
WHITES CITY NMD
WHITES CITY NMD
WHITES CITY NMD
DATE
COLL
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
17
18
19
20
15
13
16
17
18
19
20
DATE
COUNT
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
18
20
20
24
19
16
17
18
19
21
21
I
131
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
PC/L
I
133
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
CS
137
70
65
60
75
65
95
65
70
65
80
75
-------
00
Table 1, Results of milk samples collected following the Pike Event (activity extrapolated
to time of collection), (continued)
PC/L
DATE DATE I I CS
LOCATION ID COLL COUNT 131 133 137
AUSTIN TEX
AUSTIN TEX
AUSTIN TEX
AUSTIN TEX
AUSTIN TEX
DALLAS TEX
DALLAS TEX
DALLAS TEX
DALLAS TEX
DALLAS TEX
DALLAS TEX
DALLAS TEX
DALLAS TEX
DALLAS TEX
DALLAS TEX
EL PASO TEX
EL PASO TEX
EL PASO TEX
EL PASO TEX
EL PASO TEX
LUBBOCK TEX
LUBBOCK TEX
LUBBOCK TEX
LUBBOCK TEX
D01
D01
D01
F02
F02
D01
D01
D01
D01
D01
001
D01
D01
D01
F02
D
D
D
D
D
D01
D01
D02
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
04
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
14
18
19
17
20
17
18
19
20
26
27
30
31
03
16
18
19
20
21
22
16
20
22
21
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
04
04
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
17
21
24
18
21
18
19
24
24
27
31
31
02
07
18
19
20
22
23
24
18
24
30
24
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
50
70
50
50
55
75
130
90
80
110
60
80
60
65
90
30
40
45
35
25
40
70
85
30
-------
Table !<, Results of milk samples collected folio-wing the PJ ke Event (activity extrapolated
to time of collection), (continued)
DATE
LOCATION
A JO ARIZ
A JO ARIZ
BUCKEYE ARIZ
BUCKEYE ARIZ
BAGDAD ARIZ
BAGDAD ARIZ
CHINO VLLY ARIZ
CHINO VLLY ARIZ
CHINO VLLY ARIZ
CHINO VLLY ARIZ
COTTONWOOD ARIZ
COTTONWOOD ARIZ
EHRENBERG ARIZ
EHRENBERG ARIZ
EHRENBERG ARIZ
KINGMAN ARIZ
KINGMAN ARIZ
KINGMAN ARIZ
KINGMAN ARIZ
KINGMAN ARIZ
KINGMAN ARIZ
KINGMAN ARIZ
PARKER ARIZ
PARKER ARIZ
PARKER ARIZ
PARKER ARIZ
PARKER ARIZ
ID
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
F
F
F
F
F
COLL
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
17
19
16
18
19
21
14
17
19
20
17
19
15
16
18
14
16
17
18
19
20
21
16
18
19
21
22
DATE
GR/L
COUNT
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
19
21
17
21
21
21
16
17
23
23
18
21
16
16
19
15
17
18
19
20
25
23
16
19
20
25
23
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
CA
.57
.66
.52
,15
.10
.09
.22
.22
.34
.34
.15
.88
.46
46
.20
.28
.14
.22
.23
.23
.25
22
.20
.17
.17
.34
.34
PC/L
SR 89
ND
ND
ND
5
ND
ND
ND
ND
5
5
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
5
ND
5
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
5
PC/L
SR 90
5
1
4
6
3
3
7
8
7
7
1
ND
3
3
2
2
4
4
3
2
3
4
6
4
5
5
5
-------
Table 1. Results of milk samples collected following the Pike Event (activity extrapolated
to time of collection) (continued)
LOCATION
PHOENIX
PHOENI*
PHOENIX
PHOENIX
PHOENIX
TEMPE
TEMPE
TEMPE
TEMPE
TEMPE
TUCSON
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
TUCSON ARIZ
TUCSON ARIZ
WENOEN ARIZ
W1CKENBURG ARIZ
YUMA ARIZ
YUMA ARIZ
YUMA ARIZ
YUMA ARIZ
YUMA ARiZ
YUMA ARIZ
YUMA ARIZ
YUMA ARIZ
YUMA ARXZ
Y'UMA ARi'Z
YUMA ARiZ
YUMA ARIZ
YUMA ARIZ
YUMA ARiZ
YUMA ARiZ
ID
D01
D01
F02
F02
F03
D02
D02
D03
F01
F01
D
D
D
F
F
F01
F01
F01
F01
FOI
F01
FOi
F01
FOI
FOI
FOI
F02
F02
F02
F02
DATE
COLL
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
04
03
03
03
03
20
26
18
19
18
19
26
18
14
19
17
18
26
18
19
16
18
19
21
22
23
24
25
27
30
02
17
18
19
21
DATE
COUNT
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
04
04
03
03
03
03
21
31
19
20
21
21
30
19
14
21
17
19
31
19
20
17
18
19
25
24
24
25
26
30
02
03
17
18
19
25
GR/L
CA
1.16
1.14
1.14
1.25
1.13
1.15
1.14
1.14
1.38
1.18
1.19
1.28
1.09
.
1.42
i.12
1.17
1.42
1.18
1.15
1.16
1.18
1.18
1.38
1«38
1.14
1.16
1.14
1.20
1.16
PC/L
SR 89
5
ND
ND
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
5
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
5
ND
ND
PC/L
SR 90
2
5
12
10
1
2
3
5
4
3
2
3
5
4
4
6
4
9
2
4
4
2
2
3
3
5
4
3
3
4
-------
Table 1. Results of milk samples collected following the Pike Event (activity extrapolated
to time of collection), (continued)
DATE DATE GR/L PC/L PC/L
LOCATION ID COLL COUNT CA SR 89 SR 90
1*15 ND 4
1.16 ND 4
1.16 ND 4
1.16 ND 4
1.20 ND 4
1.20 ND 4
1.20 ND 4
YUMA
YUMA
YUMA
YUMA
YUMA
YUMA
YUMA
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
ARIZ
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
03
03
03
03
03
03
04
22
23
24
25
27
28
01
03
03
03
03
03
04
04
24
25
25
26
30
01
03
-------
Table 1. Results of milk samples collected following the Pike Event (activity extrapolated
to time of collection), (continued)
GR/L PC/L PC/L
CA SR 89 SR 90
1»15 5 1
1.16 ND 3
1.14 ND 2
1.14 ND 2
1.16 ND 3
1.15 ND 2
1.14 ND 2
1.14 ND 2
1.20 ND 4
1.36 ND 3
1.33 ND 3
1.42 ND 3
1.58 ND 2
1 ^"2 ND 3
1.22 5 3
ND ND
1.14 ND 2
1.12 ND 2
1.16 ND 3
1.14 ND 2
1.14 ND 2
1.20 ND 4
1.20 ND 4
DATE
LOCATION
BARD CAL
BARD CAL
BARD CAL
BARD CAL
BARD CAL
BARD CAL
BARD CAL
BARD CAL
BARD CALIF
BLYTHE CAL
BLYTHE CAL
BLYTHE CAL
BLYTHE CAL
BLYTHE CAL
BRAWLY CAL
INDIO CAL
WINTERHAVEN CAL
WINTERHAVEN CAL
WINTERHAVEN CAL
WINTERHAVEN CAL
WINTERHAVEN CAL
WINTERHAVEN CAL
WINTERHAVEN CAL
ID
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
D
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
COLL
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
19
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
28
16
19
21
22
24
18
19
21
22
23
24
25
27
28
DATE
COUNT
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
04
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
04
20
20
25
25
24
24
25
26
01
16
20
25
24
25
19
20
25
24
24
25
26
30
01
-------
Table 1. Results of milk samples collected following the Pike Event (activity extrapolated
to time of collection), (continued)
DATE DATE GR/L PC/L PC/L
LOCATION ID COLL COUNT CA SR 89 SR 90
OJ
LAS VEGAS NEV
LAS VEGAS NEV
LAS VEGAS NEV
LAS VEGAS NEV
LAS VEGAS NEV
LAS VEGAS NEV
LAS VEGAS NEV
LAS VEGAS NEV
LAS VEGAS NEV
LAS VEGAS NEV
LAS VEGAS NEV
LAS VEGAS NEV
LAS VEGAS NEV
LAS VEGAS NEV
LAS VEGAS NEV
LAS VEGAS NEV
LAS VEGAS NEV
LAS VEGAS NEV
LAS VEGAS NEV
LAS VEGAS NEV
LAS VEGAS NEV
LAS VEGAS NEV
LAS VEGAS NEV
LAS VEGAS NEV
LAS VEGAS NEV
LAS VEGAS NEV
LAS VEGAS NEV
LAS VEGAS NEV
LAS VEGAS NEV
LAS VEGAS NEV
D03
DOS
D03
DOS
DOS
DOS
DOS
DOS
DOS
D04
D04
D04
D04
D04
D04
D04
D04
D04
D04
D04
D07
D07
D07
D07
D07
D07
D07
D07
D07
DOS
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
16
17
18
19
21
22
23
25
26
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
25
26
27
16
18
19
20
21
23
25
26
27
17
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
16
17
19
19
21
23
24
26
30
16
17
19
19
21
21
23
24
26
30
31
16
19
19
21
21
24
26
30
31
17
1*04
1.18
1.20
1.25
1.10
1.18
.83
1.22
1.11
1.12
1.17
1.33
1.14
1.23
1.23
1.12
.86
1.26
1.14
1.12
1.12
1.10
1.12
1.20
1*00
.90
1.12
1.14
1.18
ND
5
ND
5
5
ND
5
5
ND
ND
5
5
ND
5
ND
ND
5
5
ND
ND
ND
5
5
5
ND
ND
5
ND
ND
5
18
12
15
14
15
13
14
19
12
11
15
14
11
10
15
10
9
14
11
13
13
11
8
13
11
9
13
12
18
-------
Table 1, Results of milk samples collected following the Pike Event (activity extrapolated
to time of collection), (continued)
LOCATION ID
MOAPA NEV F
WOAPA NEV F
OVERTON NEV F
OVERTQN NEV F
PAHRUMP NEV F
PAHRUMP NEV F
PAHRUMP NEV F
DATE
COLL
03 15
03 16
03 15
03 16
03 14
03 15
03 16
DATE
COUNT
03 16
03 16
03 15
03 16
03 15
03 17
03 17
6R/L
CA
1.15
1.15
1.25
1.20
1.31
1.20
1.15
PC/L
SR 89
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
PC/L
SR 90
16
16
11
11
3
3
4
-------
Table 1. Results of milk samples collected following the Pike Event (activity extrapolated
to time of collection), (continued)
DATE DATE GR/L PC/L PC/L
LOCATION ID COLL COUNT CA SR 89 SR 90
ALAMOGORDO NMD 03 16 03 18 . 5 8
ALAMOGORDO NMD 03 19 03 20 1.46 5 7
ALAMOGORDO NMD 03 20 03 21 1.23 5 6
ARTESIA N M D 03 16 03 17 1.09 5 4
ARTESIA N M D 03 18 03 19 1.12 ND 4
ARTESIA N M D 03 19 03 20 1.11 ND 4
ARTESIA N M D 03 20 03 21 1.20 ND 16
CARLSBAD N M D 03 13 03 16 1.18 ND 5
CARLSBAD N M D 03 16 03 17 1.12 ND 4
CARLSBAD N M D 03 17 03 18 1.28 5 4
CARLSBAD N M D 03 17 03 18 1*27 ND 4
CARLSBAD N M D 03 18 03 19 1.22 ND 6
CARLSBAD N M D 03 19 03 20 1.17 ND 4
CARLSBAD N M D 03 20 03 21 1.20 ND 5
EUNICE N M D 03 17 03 18 1.44 5 35
EUNICE N M D 03 19 03 21 1.36 5 36
GILA N M D 03 16 03 17 1.18 ND 7
LAS CRUCES NMD 03 17 03 18 1.28 ND 6
LAS CRUCES NMD 03 18 03 20 1.22 ND 7
LAS CRUCES NMD 03 20 03 21 1.23 5 4
LAS VEGAS NMD 03 18 03 19 1.36 5 15
LOVING N M D 03 13 04 08 1.33 ND 10
ROSWELL N M D 03 16 03 18 1.15 5 2
ROSWELL N M D 03 17 03 18 1.31 5 6
ROSWELL N M D 03 18 03 20 1.10 ND 6
ROSWELL NMD 03 19 03 20 1.21 5 7
ROSWELL N M D 03 20 03 24 1.02 ND 5
TUCUMCARI NMD 03 15 03 19 . 10 12
-------
Table 1. Results of milk samples collected following the Pike Event (activity extrapolated
to time of collection), (continued)
DATE DATE GR/L PC/L PC/L
LOCATION ID COLL COUNT CA SR 89 SR 90
WHITES CITY NMD 03 13 03 16 1.15 ND 10
WHITES CITY NMD 03 16 03 17 1.14 ND 7
WHITES CITY NMD 03 17 03 18 1.20 5 5
WHITES CITY NMD 03 18 03 19 1.07 5 4
WHITES CITY NMD 03 19 03 21 1.18 ND 5
WHITES CITY hi M D 03 20 03 21 1.13 ND 5
-------
Table 1. Results of milk samples collected following the Pike Event (activity extrapolated
to time of collection), (continued)
DATE DATE GR/L PC/L PC/L
LOCATION ID COLL COUNT CA SR 89 SR 90
AUSTIN TEX D01 03 14 03 17 1.14 5 11
AUSTIN TEX D01 03 18 03 21 1.18 5 r
AUSTIN TEX F02 03 17 03 18 1,25 ND 10
AUSTIN TEX F02 03 20 03 21 1.23 5 1C
DALLAS TEX D01 03 17 03 18 1.25 ND 13
DALLAS TEX D01 03 18 03 19 1.28 ND 18
DALLAS TEX DOl 03 19 03 24 1.18 5 17
DALLAS TEX DOl 03 20 03 24 1.23 ND 18
DALLAS TEX DOl 03 27 03 31 1.22 ND 15
DALLAS TEX DOl 03 30 03 31 1.22 ND 15
DALLAS TEX DOl 03 31 04 02 1.22 ND 15
DALLAS TEX DOl 04 03 04 07 1.18 ND 14
EL PASO TEX D 03 18 03 19 1.36 5 15
EL PASO TEX D 03 19 03 20 1.06 ND 4
EL PASO TEX D 03 21 03 23 1.06 ND 5
EL PASO TEX D 03 22 03 24 1.10 ND 5
LU8BOCK TEX D02 03 21 ' 03 24 1.14 ND 13
LUBBOCK TEX DOl 03 22 03 30 1.15 ND 11
-------
Table 2. Results of raw milk samples collected following the Pike Event (activity
extrapolated to time of collection).
00
LOCATION
ID
DATE DATE
COLL. COUNT
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
FOl
F01
FOl
FOl
FOl
FOl
FOl
FOl
FOl
FOl
FOl
FOl
FOl
FOl
FOl
FOl
FOl
FOl
D
D
D
D
D
D
G
D
G
D
D
G
G
D
G
D
G
D
D
G
D
G
D
G
D
G
G
D
D
G
FD
FD
FD
FD
FD
FD
CH
FD
CH
FD
FD
CH
CH
FD
CH
FD
CH
FD
FD
CH
FD
CH
FD
CH
FD
CH
CH
FD
FD
CH
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
15PM
16AM
16PM
17AM
17PM
18AM
18PM
18PM
19AM
19AM
19PM
19PM
20AM
20AM
20PM
20PM
21AM
21AM
21PM
21PM
22AM
22AM
22PM
22PM
23AM
23AM
23PM
23PM
24AM
24AM
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
15
16
16
17
17
18
18
18
19
19
19
19
20
20
21
21
21
21
22
22
22
22
23
23
23
23
24
24
24
24
I
131
30
70
70
50
ND
150
220
80
150
70
60
250
300
40
150
50
420
50
50
330
ND
290
ND
240
40
300
260
ND
ND
260
PC/L
I
133
200
100
65
30
ND
40
150
30
40
ND
ND
50
ND
ND
ND
ND
40
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
CS
137
70
70
120
85
45
80
80
70
70
70
85
85
75
65
60
40
70
70
90
60
65
90
70
55
35
no
55
70
75
70
-------
Table 2, Results of raw milk samples collected following the Pike Event (activity
extrapolated to time of collection), (continued)
NO
LOCATION
ID
DATE DATE
COLL. COUNT
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
D
G
D
G
G
D
G
D
G
D
G
D
G
D
G
D
G
D
G
D
D
G
G
D
G
D
G
D
G
D
FD
CH
FD
CH
CH
FD
CH
FD
CH
FD
CH
FD
CH
FD
CH
FD
CH
FD
CH
FD
FD
CH
CH
FD
CH
FD
CH
FD
CH
FD
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
24PM
24PM
25AM
25AM
25PM
25PM
26AM
26AM
26PM
26PM
27AM
27AM
27PM
27PM
28AM
28AM
28PM
28PM
29AM
29AM
29PM
29PM
30AM
30AM
30PM
30PM
31AM
31AM
31PM
31PM
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
04
04
25
25
25
25
26
26
26
26
27
27
27
27
29
30
30
30
29
30
29
30
30
30
30
30
31
31
31
31
01
01
I
131
30
180
ND
170
150
ND
120
30
110
ND
110
40
80
50
60
40
80
ND
120
30
ND
110
110
30
80
40
70
ND
30
30
PC/L
I
133
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
CS
137
70
55
85
60
40
75
50
75
25
70
50
70
30
80
30
90
30
60
40
55
60
35
35
45
30
55
40
50
45
55
-------
Table 2, Results of raw milk samples collected following the Pike Event (activity
extrapolated to time of collection), (continued)
PC/L
DATE DATE I I
LOCATION ID COLL. COUNT 131 133
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
>_AS
LAS
LAS
LAS
i_AS
^AS
LAS
LAS
.AS
LAS
LAS
,AS
_AS
LAS
L AS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
FOl
FOl
FOi
FOl
FOI
FOl
FOl
FOl
FOi
FOi
FOl
G
D
G
D
G
D
D
G
D
G
G
G
D
D
G
G
D
D
D
G
G
D
G
D
G
D
D
G
G
D
CH
FD
CH
FD
CH
FD
FD
CH
FD
CH
CH
CH
FD
FD
CH
CH
FD
FD
FD
CH
CH
FD
CH
FD
CH
FD
FD
CH
CH
FD
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
OH
04
04
04
0^
04
01AM
01AM
01PM
01PM
02AM
02AM
02PM
02PM
03AM
03AM
03PM
04AM
04AM
04PM
04PM
05AM
05AM
05PM
05PM
05PM
06AM
06AM
06PM
06PM
07AM
07AM
07PM
07PM
08AM
08AM
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
01
01
02
02
02
02
03
03
03
03
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
07
0?
07
07
08
08
08
08
09
09
09
09
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
30
30
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
CS
137
75
80
60
60
45
70
40
80
80
60
25
40
70
65
55
45
55
85
60
45
30
55
50
50
50
65
70
*5
55
65
-------
Table 2. Results of raw milk samples collected following the Pike Event (activity
extrapolated to time of collection), (continued)
DATE
LOCATION
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
ID
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
COLL.
G
D
G
D
G
D
G
D
G
G
G
CH
FD
CH
FD
CH
FD
CH
FD
CH
CH
CH
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
08PM
08PM
09AM
09AM
09PM
09PM
10AM
10AM
13AM
15
17AM
DATE
COUNT
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
09
09
09
09
13
13
13
13
14
16
20
I
131
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
PC/L
I
133
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
CS
137
55
65
60
50
70
55
55
50
55
65
75
-------
Table 2. Results of ra\tf milk samples collected following the Pike Event (activity
extrapolated to time of collection, (continued)
LOCATION
LAS VEGAS NEV
LAS VEGAS NEV
LAS VEGAS NEV
LAS VEGAS NEV
LAS VEGAS NEV
LAS VEGAS NEV
LAS VEGAS NEV
LAS VEGAS NEV
LAS VEGAS NEV
LAS VEGAS NEV
LAS VEGAS NEV
LAS VEGAS NEV
LAS VEGAS NEV
LAS VEGAS NEV
LAS VEGAS NEV
LAS VEGAS NEV
LAS VEGAS NEV
LAS VEGAS NEV
LAS VEGAS NEV
LAS VEGAS NEV
LAS VEGAS NEV
LAS VEGAS NEV
LAS VEGAS NEV
LAS VEGAS NEV
LAS VEGAS NEV
LAS VEGAS NEV
LAS VEGAS NEV
LAS VEGAS NEV
DATE
ID
F01
FOl
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
FOl
F01
FOl
COLL.
D
D
D
D
D
G
D
G
D
D
G
G
D
G
D
G
D
D
G
D
G
D
G
D
G
G
D
D
FD
FD
FD
FD
FD
CH
FD
CH
FD
FD
CH
CH
FD
CH
FD
CH
FD
FD
CH
FD
CH
FD
CH
FD
CH
CH
FD
FD
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
15PM
16AM
17AM
17PM
18AM
18PM
18PM
19AM
19AM
19PM
19PM
20AM
20AM
20PM
20PM
21AM
21AM
21PM
21PM
22AM
22AM
22PM
22PM
23AM
23AM
23PM
23PM
24AM
DATE
COUNT
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
15
16
17
It
18
18
18
19
19
19
19
20
20
21
21
21
21
22
22
22
22
23
23
23
23
24
24
24
GR/L
CA
1*12
1*16
1.18
1.14
1.33
1.31
1.36
1.46
1.22
1.41
1.22
1.09
.96
1.11
1.13
.98
1.00
1.01
1.46
1.35
1.46
1.10
1.20
1.01
1.18
1.04
.96
.98
PC/L
SR 89
10
5
ND
ND
5
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
5
5
ND
5
ND
5
ND
5
ND
ND
ND
5
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
PC/L
SR 90
9
8
10
8
7
5
7
4
6
4
3
4
5
2
6
1
4
2
6
3
6
4
4
5
3
4
6
4
-------
Table 2. Results of raw milk samples collected following the Pike Event (activity
extrapolated to time of collection), (continued)
DATE
LOCATION
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
ID
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
FOl
F01
FOl
FOl
FOl
FOl
FOl
FOl
FOl
FOl
FOl
FOl
FOl
FOl
FOl
FOl
COLL.
G
D
G
D
G
G
D
G
D
G
D
G
D
G
D
G
G
D
G
D
G
D
G
D
G
CH
FD
CH
FD
CH
CH
FD
CH
FD
CH
FD
CH
FD
CH
FD
CH
CH
FD
CH
FD
CH
FD
CH
FD
CH
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
04
24AM
24PM
24PM
25AM
25AM
25PM
25PM
26AM
26AM
26PM
26PM
27AM
27AM
27PM
27PM
28AM
28PM
28AM
29AM
29AM
30PM
30PM
31AM
31AM
01PM
DATE
COUNT
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
04
24
25
25
25
25
26
26
26
26
27
27
27
27
29
30
30
29
30
29
30
31
31
31
31
02
GR/L
CA
1.34
1.18
.78
1.01
1.09
1.27
1.12
1.34
1.25
1.10
.92
1.28
1.47
1.34
1.28
1.44
1.36
1.49
1.30
1.07
1.30
1.07
1.22
PC/L
SR 89
ND
ND
ND
5
ND
ND
ND
ND
5
ND
ND
ND
10
5
ND
ND
ND
5
ND
5
5
ND
5
ND
ND
PC/L
SR 90
3
4
4
6
62
3
4
2
6
4
5
2
10
2
6
2
2
4
3
5
3
4
3
4
3
-------
Table 2. Results of raw milk samples collected following the Pike Event (activity
extrapolated to time of collection), (continued)
DATE
LOCATION
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
10
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
F01
COLL.
D
G
D
G
D
G
G
D
G
D
G
G
D
G
D
G
0
G
G
G
FD
CH
FD
CH
FD
CH
CH
FD
CH
FD
CH
CH
FD
CH
FD
CH
FD
CH
CH
CH
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
01PM
02AM
02AM
03PM
04PM
04PM
04AM
05PM
05AM
05AM
07AM
08PM
08PM
09PM
09PM
10AM
10AM
13AM
15
17AM
DATE
COUNT
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
02
02
02
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
08
09
09
13
13
13
13
14
16
20
GR/L
CA
PC/L
SR 89
1.05
1.22
1.05
1.06
1.14
1.11
1.11
1.14
1.06
.92
1.31
1.22
1.26
1.22
1.10
1.25
1.18
1.20
1.12
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
SMPLE
ND
5
ND
5
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
5
PC/L
SR 90
3
3
3
3
7
5
5
7
3
LOST
6
3
4
5
3
5
5
5
6
4
-------
Table 2. Results of raw milk samples collected following the Pike Event (activity
extrapolated to time of collection), (continued)
LOCATION
ID
DATE DATE
COLL. COUNT
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
D
D
D
D
D
D
G
D
D
G
G
G
D
G
D
D
G
G
D
G
D
G
D
D
G
D
G
D
FD
FD
FD
FD
FD
FD
CH
FD
FD
CH
CH
CH
FD
CH
FD
FD
CH
CH
FD
CH
FD
CH
FD
FD
CH
FD
CH
FD
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
15AM
15AM
15PM
16AM
16PM
17AM
17PM
17PM
18AM
18AM
18PM
18PM
18PM
19AM
19AM
19PM
19PM
20AM
20AM
20PM
20PM
21AM
21AM
21PM
21PM
22AM
22AM
22PM
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
15
15
15
16
17
17
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
19
19
20
20
20
20
21
21
21
21
22
22
22
22
23
I
131
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
40
ND
40
50
50
ND
ND
ND
40
40
60
40
70
ND
60
30
30
60
ND
ND
ND
PC/L
I
133
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
CS
137
45
50
45
55
35
45
50
50
55
50
50
50
60
60
50
55
50
45
45
60
20
55
50
50
35
50
35
45
-------
Table 2. Results of raw milk samples collected following the Pike Event (activity
extrapolated to time of collection), (continued)
LOCATION
10
DATE DATE
COLL. COUNT
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
..AS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
G
D
G
G
D
D
G
G
D
G
D
G
D
G
D
D
G
D
G
D
G
G
D
G
G
G
D
G
CH
FD
CH
CH
FD
FD
CH
CH
FD
CH
FD
CH
FD
CH
FD
FD
CH
FD
CH
FD
CH
CH
FD
CH
CH
CH
FD
CH
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
22PM
23AM
23AM
23PM
23PM
24AM
24AM
24PM
24PM
25AM
25AM
25PM
25PM
26AM
26AM
26PM
26PM
27AM
27AM
27PM
27PM
28AM
28PM
28PM
29AM
29PM
29PM
30AM
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
23
23
23
24
24
24
24
25
25
25
25
26
26
26
26
27
27
27
27
30
29
29
30
29
29
31
30
31
I
131
30
ND
50
ND
ND
ND
ND
30
ND
30
ND
40
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
40
ND
50
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
PC/L
I
133
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
CS
137
45
35
45
50
55
45
40
45
35
45
35
50
40
45
40
40
45
35
50
35
40
<*5
45
45
40
35
35
40
-------
Table 2. Results of raw milk samples collected following the Pike Event (activity
extrapolated to time of collection), (continued)
DATE
LOCATION
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VE6AS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
ID
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
COLL.
G
D
G
D
D
D
D
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
CH
FD
CH
FD
FD
FD
FD
CH
CH
CH
CH
CH
CH
CH
CH
CH
CH
CH
03
03
03
03
03
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
30PM
30PM
31AM
31AM
31PM
01AM
02AM
03AM
04AM
05AM
06AM
07AM
08AM
09AM
10AM
13AM
15AM
17AM
DATE
COUNT
03
03
03
03
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
31
31
31
31
01
01
03
03
06
06
07
08
09
10
15
14
16
20
I
131
30
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
PC/L
I
133
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
CS
137
40
35
35
35
45
50
55
35
40
30
35
50
45
40
25
45
35
75
-------
Table 2. Results of raw milk samples collected following the Pike Event (activity
extrapolated to time of collection), (continued)
DATE DATE 6R/L PC/L PC/L
LOCATION ID COLL. COUNT CA SR 89 SR 90
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
D
D
D
D
G
D
D
G
G
D
G
G
D
D
G
D
G
D
G
D
G
D
G
D
G
D
G
G
D
FD
FD
FD
FO
CH
FD
FD
CH
CH
FD
CH
CH
FD
FD
CH
FD
CH
FD
CH
FD
CH
FD
CH
FD
CH
FD
CH
CH
FD
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
15AM
16AM
16PM
17AM
17PM
17PM
18AM
18AM
18PM
18PM
19AM
19PM
19AM
19PM
20AM
20AM
20PM
20PM
21AM
21PM
21PM
22AM
22AM
22PM
22PM
23AM
23AM
23PM
23PM
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
15
16
17
17
18
18
18
18
18
18
19
20
20
19
20
20
21
21
21
22
22
22
22
23
23
23
23
24
24
1.60
1.36
1.36
1.40
1.62
1.38
1.58
1.62
1.47
1.60
1.30
1.41
1.50
1.57
1.39
1.25
1.54
1.47
1.56
1.60
1.46
1.61
1.53
1.71
1.54
1.56
1.38
1.65
1.59
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
5
ND
ND
ND
5
ND
ND
ND
ND
5
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
5
ND
ND
ND
ND
5
7
18
11
11
6
9
11
6
3
6
5
3
6
6
3
3
5
4
6
6
6
7
6
5
6
6
5
7
6
-------
Table 2, Results of raw milk samples collected following the Pike Event (activity
extrapolated to time of collection),, (continued)
DATE
LOCATION
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
LAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
VEGAS
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
NEV
ID
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
F02
COLL.
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
24AM
24AM
24PM
24PM
25AM
25PM
25PM
26AM
26AM
26PM
26PM
27AM
27AM
28PM
30AM
30PM
30PM
31AM
31AM
02AM
04AM
05AM
10AM
13AM
15AM
17AM
DATE
COUNT
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
03
04
04
04
04
04
04
04
24
24
25
25
25
26
26
26
26
27
27
27
27
29
31
31
31
31
31
03
06
06
15
14
16
20
GR/L
CA
1.48
1.50
1.49
1.46
1.47
1.49
1.50
1.59
1.53
1.58
1.59
1.46
1.49
1.54
1.42
1.42
1.28
1.52
1.28
1.28
1.28
1.71
1.35
1.59
PC/L
SR 89
ND
ND
5
ND
ND
5
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
5
5
5
5
ND
ND
ND
ND
5
5
ND
5
5
ND
PC/L
SR 90
8
5
4
6
7
3
15
5
5
5
11
6
4
5
12
12
7
7
7
7
20
20
10
5
5
8
-------
Table 3. Results of milk samples collected following Shoal.
COLLECTION DATA
LOCATION
Crazy K Ranch
Dixie Valley, Nevada
Oats Farm
Fallen, Nevada
A. Jackson
Hawthorne, Nevada
Peavine Ranch, Nevada
Alvin Hughes
Schurz, Nevada
Lyle DeBraga
Stillwater, Nevada
DATE
COLLECTED
01/31/64
01/29/64
04/01/64
02/01/64
04/02/64
01/04/64
02/03/64
03/05/64
04/29/64
06/03/64
02/01/64
03/31/64
05/05/64
01/30/64
04/02/64
RADIOCHEMICAL DATA
ACTIVITY (pCi/1)
89Sr 90Sr 131I 140Ba-La 1 37Cs
5 38 <10 <10 165
5 5 <10 <10 35
5 37 <10 <10 420
5 27 <10 <10 100
15 30 <10 <10 130
<5 5 <10 <10 75
10 31 <10 <10 345
<5 6 <10 <10 95
5 5 <10 <10 45
10 5 <10 <10 80
<5 10 <10 <10 85
30 64 <10 <10 375
<5 84 <10 <10 410
5 6 <10 <10 45
5 9 <10 <10 55
:ONCENTRATION(9nv1
Ca K
1.34 1.1
1.22 1.6
1.23 1.6
1.47 1.7
1.57 1.5
1.05 1.7
1.26 1.3
1.25 1.5
1.38 1.5
1.52 1.3
1.01 1.4
1.42
1.5
1.27 1.6
1.42 1.3
Ol
o
-------
Table 4. Results of routine milk sampling.
Location
Anderson Dairy,
Las Vegas, Nev.
Arden Dairy,
Las Vegas, Nev.
Bliss Dairy,
Las Vegas, Nev.
Hiland Dairy,
Las Vegas, Nev.
Hinies Dairy,
Las Vegas, Nev.
Meadow Gold Dairy,
Las Vegas, Nev.
O. Simpson,
Adaven, Nev.
M. Stewart,
Alamo, Nev.
Date
1/16/64
2/24/64
3/11/64
4/17/64
6/23/64
1/16/64
2/24/64
3/11/64
4/17/64
6/23/64
1/16/64
3/11/64
4/02/64
4/17/64
6/23/64
2/24/64
3/11/64
4/02/64
4/17/64
6/23/64
1/16/64
2/24/64
3/11/64
4/02/64
4/17/64
6/23/64
1/16/64
2/24/64
3/11/64
4/17/64
6/23/64
4/16/64
1/27/64
3/03/64
3/30/64
4/29/64
89Sr
5
5
B
10
5
5
5
5
B
B
5
B
10
5
5
5
5
15
5
10
B
5
B
B
5
5
B
B
15
5
20
B
5
B
10
pCi/1
90Sr 13
15
19
15
12
8
13
19
14
11
6
13
17
14
13
15
20
16
14
11
8
12
11
10
14
5
18
12
17
23
22
29
8
17
21
19
;I
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
140Ba-
La
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
137Cs
110
130
115
110
65
70
70
100
95
65
95
130
105
110
85
115
130
105
110
40
90
95
80
80
90
30
105
115
115
150
SMPL LOST
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
370
50
120
130
180
gm/1
Ca K
1.24
1.14
1. 16
1.20
1. 15
1.22
1.17
1.14
1.20
1. 17
1.24
1. 18
1.29
1.34
1.23
1.22
1.00
1. 16
1.25
1. 17
1. 13
0.97
1. 16
1.08
1.14
1.23
1.20
1.25
1.15
1.46
1.13
1.20
1.23
1. 22
1.7
1.6
1.4
1.6
1.5
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.8
1.5
1.7
1.6
1.2
1.6
1.2
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.7
1. 1
1.6
1.6
1.5
1.4
1.5
1.2
1.6
1.5
1.7
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.4
1.3
1.7
51
-------
Table 4, Results of routine milk sampling, (continufd)
Location
R. Young,
Caliente, Nev,
Blue Eagle Ranch,
Currant,, Nev.
Halstead Ranch,
Duckwater, Nev.
Fish Creek Ranch,
Eureka, Nev.
Hanson Ranch,
Hiko, Nev.
Selbach Ranch,
Lathrop Wells
Lo Stevens,
Lida, Nev.
McKenzie Ranch,
Lund, Nev.
Date
1/28/64
3/05/64
3/30/64
4/29/64
1/24/64
2/19/64
4/02/64
1/23/64
1/23/64
2/19/64
2/04/64
3/05/64
4/01/64
1/27/64
3/03/64
3/30/64
4/29/64
1/10/64
2/14/64
1/18/64
2/06/64
3/04/64
4/01/64
4/30/64
6/02/64
1/08/64
1/16/64
1/24/64
1/29/64
2/05/64
2/14/64
2/20/64
2/27/64
3/05/64
3/12/64
3/19/64
3/26/64
pCi/
89gr 9
5
B
B
1
'Sr
10
10
27
i ,3 i i
A
A
A
M"Ba-
La '
A
A
A
"C.
65
75
85
SOUR
10
5
15
B
5
55
55
56
6
44
5 102
B
5
B
B
5
B
5
B
B
B
B
5
25
B
5
5
5
B
5
8
B
10
5
5
10
5
26
32
30
7
7
10
11
4
15
10
9
17
21
21
23
24
23
24
25
72
23
23
17
17
15
24
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
375
310
455
100
340
365
150
305
210
60
45
60
90
35
25
50
60
130
110
100
185
170
170
175
160
165
150
170
155
165
115
I <5
gm/1
Ca K
1. 1 1
I. 46
1.62
1. 17
1. 33
1. 10
1.44
1.29
1.26
1.29
1. 22
0. 76
1. 16
1. 20
1. 37
1. 16
1. 19
1. 20
1.07
1.66
1.63
1. 52
1. 15
1. 15
1.25
1. 12
1. \1
1. 18
1. 14
1.23
1. 14
1, 2Z
I. 16
1. 14
I. 22
I. 5
1.7
0, 9
1.4
1.7
I
1.6
1. 3
1. 1
1. 1
1.4
1. 5
I. 3
1. 5
1 5
1.5
1.4
0.9
1.0
1. 5
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.6
1.7
1,7
1.6
1.6
1.6
1,5
1.7
1. 3
1.6
52
-------
Table 4. Results of routine milk sampling, (continued)
Location
McKenzie Ranch,
Lund, Nev.
Peavine Ranch,
Manhattan, Nev.
K. Searles,
Moapa, Nev.
Sharp Ranch,
Nyala, Nev.
Bowman Ranch,
Pahrump, Nev.
H. Horlacher,
Pioche, Nev.
P. Peacock,
Springdale.Nev.
Date
4/03/64
4/09/64
4/15/64
4/23/64
4/30/64
5/08/64
5/14/64
5/21/64
5/29/64
6/04/64
6/10/64
6/18/64
1/04/64
2/03/64
3/05/64
4/29/64
6/03/64
1/29/64
3/06/64
3/30/64
4/29/64
4/01/64
1/07/64
2/14/64
3/31/64
5/02/64
5/29/64
1/29/64
3/04/64
3/30/64
4/29/64
1/07/64
2/11/64
3/04/64
4/02/64
5/03/64
5/27/64
pCi/1
89Sr 90Sr 131I
B
B
15
5
B
5
10
B
5
5
10
5
B
10
B
10
B
B
B
5
B
B
26
24
13
25
23
17
28
37
39
30
37
40
5
31
6
5
12
36
14
9
45
2
SOUR
B
B
B
B
B
B
3
8
8
9
4
5
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
\
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
140Ba-
La
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
137Cs
25
180
110
170
165
125
260
235
325
270
235
375
75
345
95
45
80
80
125
115
90
425
30
50
40
50
45
50
50
30
SOUR
B
B
B
5
5
B
7
4
11
5
10
6
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
100
95
115
75
125
60
gm/1
Ca K
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
02
16
18
15
20
17
19
15
15
19
17
20
05
26
25
52
15
16
17
23
24
29
28
26
32
86
39
35
25
24
35
38
32
34
1.4
0.9
1.4
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.3
1.6
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.3
1.5
1.5
1.3
1.6
1.3
1.4
1.6
1.5
1.5
1.4
1.6
1.6
1.7
1.4
1.2
1.5
1.4
1.3
1.5
1.4
53
-------
Table 4. Results of routine milk sampling, (continued)
Location
Artesia, New Mexico
Carlsbad, N. M.
White City, N. M.
Genders Ranch,
Garrison, Utah
Newcastle, Utah
R. Cox, St. George,
Utah
Date
4/21/64
4/22/64
4/22/64
1/23/64
2/20/64
3/31/64
1/06/64
2/08/64
2/19/64
2/26/64
1/03/64
1/10/64
1/17/64
1/24/64
1/30/64
2/07/64
2/14/64
2/21/64
2/28/64
3/06/64
3/13/64
3/20/64
3/27/64
4/03/64
4/10/64
4/17/64
4/24/64
5/01/64
5/08/64
5/15/64
5/22/64
5/29/64
6/05/64
6/12/64
6/19/64
89Sr
5
B
B
5
B
5
B
B
B
B
B
B
5
5
10
5
B
B
5
B
B
5
B
B
B
5
10
5
5
B
B
5
B
10
5
pCi/1
90Sr ]
4
6
3
9
9
18
12
9
13
14
19
20
21
23
22
20
22
22
21
19
22
24
13
20
6
18
12
13
14
13
13
18
13
13
12
»i
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
I40Ba-
La
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
137Cs
45
50
45
50
30
100
60
55
70
135
165
170
145
135
150
140
150
135
155
150
130
135
100
115
95
80
80
75
60
85
95
90
70
gm/1
Ca K
1. 13
1. 18
1.09
1.34
1.20
1. 12
1. 17
1.19
1.19
1. 18
1. 05
1. 17
1.23
1. 18
1. 17
1.24
1. 32
1. 21
1.16
1. 28
1. 13
1. 22
1. 18
1. 16
1.23
1. 28
1. 22
1. 22
1. 12
1. 23
1. 21
1. 39
1.23
1. 17
1. 17
1.6
1.5
1. 5
1.4
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1. 5
1.4
1.7
1.7
1.5
1.6
1.4
1.5
1. 6
1.4
1.5
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.5
1.6
1.5
1.4
1.6
1. 3
1.6
1.4
1.4
1.5
54
-------
Table 5. Results of milk samples collected following Kiwi B4D.
Location
Alamo, Nevada
Henroid Ranch,
Cherry Creek, Nev.
Tex Gates Ranch,
Cherry Creek, Nev.
Blue Eagle Ranch,
Currant, Nev.
Manzonie Ranch,
Currant, Nev.
Bradshaw Ranch,
Currant, Nev,,
Date
Coll.
1964
5/14
5/16
5/20
5/23
3/15
5/17
5/19
5/20
5/21
5/17
5/18
5/19
5/21
5/22
5/14
5/14
5/14
5/16
5/16
5/17
5/18
5/20
5/21
6/02
6/02
5/14
5/17
5/18
5/19
5/21
5/22
5/17
5/18
5/19
5/21
5/22
Date gm/1
Count
1964 Ca
5/14
5/17
5/21
5/25
3/17
5/19
5/21
5/22
5/25
5/17
5/18
5/21
5/22
5/25
5/17
5/17
5/17 1.28
5/17
5/17 1.18
5/18
5/21
5/22
5/25
6/15
6/15 .93
5/15
5/17
5/19
5/21
5/22
5/25
5/17
5/19
5/21
5/22
5/25
pCi/1
89Sr 90Sr 131I
ND
ND
3.0E1
ND
4.0E1
4.0E1
ND
ND
ND
4.0E1
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.0E2
1.1E2
5 30
1.2E2
5 26
1.2E2
ND
4.0E1
4.0E1
ND
ND 13
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
133I
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
5.0E1
7.0E1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
137Cs
1. 2E2
1.3E2
1. 1E2
1.4E2
1.6E2
1.7E2
1.6E2
1.8E2
1. 1E2
2, 2E2
1.8E2
1.7E2
1.4E2
1.8E2
6.4E2
4.9E2
3.8E2
3.7E2
2..6E2
2.6E2
3.4E2
1.6E2
5.0E2
3.6E2
5.0E2
4.4E2
5.0E2
3.6E2
1. 1E2
8. OE1
1.2E2
1.0E2
9.5E1
55
-------
Table 5, Results of milk samples collected following Kiwa B4D. (contj
Location
Kitt Lear Ranch,
Currie, Nev.
rlalstead Ranch,
Duckwater, Nev.
Eldridge Ranch, Ely
Georgetown Ranch,
Ely, Nev.
Yelland Ranch, Ely
Hiko, Nevada
McKenzie Ranch,
Lund, Nev.
Pescio Ranch, McGill
Cole Creek Ranch,
Newark Valley, Nev.
M. Sharpe's Ranch,
Nyala, Nev.
Date
Coll.
1964
5/16
5/18
5/19
5/22
5/17
5/18
5/19
5/21
5/22
6/04
6/04
5/19
5/19
5/22
5/19
5/14
5/16
5/20
5/23
5/17
5/17
5/18
5/21
5/22
5/18
5/19
5/16
5/17
5/18
5/18
5/21
5/21
6/02
6/02
Date gm/1
Count
1964 Ca
5/17
5/19
5/21
5/25
5/17
5/19
5/22
5/22
5/25
6/15
6/15 1.18
5/21
5/21
5/25
5/22
5/14
5/17
5/21
5/25
5/19
5/19
5/21
5/22
5/25
5/22
5/22
5/17
5/17
5/19
5/21
5/22
5/25
6/15 1.28
6/15
pCi
89Sr 90gr lily
ND
ND
ND
ND
9.0EL
1.1E2
1.0E2
ND
3.0E1
ND
5 17
ND
3.0E1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
5.0E1
6.0E1
ND
5.0E1
ND
3.0E1
ND 18
ND
/I
I 3 ? j
ND
ND
ND
ND
6.0E1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1?7Cs
2.4E2
?.. OE2
2. 8E2
3. OE2
1.4E2
1.6E2
1.4E2
1. 1E2
1.4E2
8, 5E1
4.4E2
1.7E2
2.8E2
3. OE2
1. 3E2
1. 2E2
1.2E2
1. 1E2
3. OE2
2.5E2
3. 2E2
2.4E2
2.9E2
1. 5E2
2.0E2
1.8E2
2. 2E2
1. 6E2
2. 2E2
2. 1E2
1. 8E2
1.4E2
56
-------
Table 5« Results of milk samples collected following Kiwi B4D. (cont)
Location
Casey's
Nyala
Ranch,
,, Nev.
American Fork, Utah
Gonders
Ranch,
Garrison, Utah
Ogden, Utah
Payson,
Utah
Salt Lake City, Utah
Date
Coll.
1964
5/17
5/17
5/18
5/20
5/22
5/27
5/27
6/04
6/04
5/18
5/19
5/18
5/18
5/18
Date gm/1
Count
1964 Ca 89Sr
5/
5/
5/
5/
17
17 1.67 20
18
22
5/25
5/
28
5/28 1.79 5
6/
6/
5/
5/
5/
5/
5/
15
15 1.71 5
19
21
19
19
19
pCi/1
9°Sr 131I 133I
L4E2
19
LOE2
7.0E1
ND
ND
25
ND
18
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
7.0E1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
137Cs
3,
3o
3.
1.
1.
1.
Z.
1.
1.
lo
1.
5E2
3E2
OE2
9E2
6E2
2E2
4E2
3E2
2E2
8E2
4E2
57
-------
DISTRIBUTION
1-15 South-western Radiological Health Laboratory, Las Vegas, Nevada
16 Test Branch, (Lt. Col. Schmucker), DMA, AEC, Washington, D.C.
17 Col. D. I. Prickett, DASA, Sandia Base, Albuquerque, New Mexico
18-20 Gordon M. Dunning, DOS, AEC, Washington, D.C.
21-23 James G. Terrill, Jr., DRH, USPHS, Washington, D.C.
24 Raymond Moore, DRH, USPHS, Region VII, Dallas, Texas
25 Clifford M. Bacigalupi, LRL, Mercury. Nevada
26 Robert H. Goeckermann, LRL, Livermore, California
27 Bryce L. Rich, LRL, Mercury, Nevada
28 William E. Ogle, LASL, Los Alamos, New Mexico
29 Harry S. Jordan, LASL, Los Alamos, New Mexico
30 Charles I. Browne, LASL, Los Alamos, New Mexico
31 James E. Reeves, Manager, NVOO, AEC, Las Vegas, Nevada
32 Robert H. Thalgott, NVOO, AEC, Las Vegas, Nevada
33 Col. E. G. Halligan, DASA, NVOO, AEC, Las Vegas, Nevada
34 Otto H. Roehlk, OSD, NVOO, AEC, Las Vegas, Nevada
35 Henry G. Vermillion, NVOO, AEC, Las Vegas, Nevada
36 Philip W. Allen, ARFRO, ESSA, NVOO, Las Vegas, Nevada
37 Frank D. Cluff, ARFRO, ESSA, NVOO, Las Vegas, Nevada
38 Victor M. Milligan, REECo Rad-Safe, Mercury, Nevada
39 Mail and Records, NVOO, AEC, Las Vegas, Nevada
------- |