EVALUATION OF THE ZHE TCLP PROTOCOL
FINAL REPORT
Contract No. 68-01-7075
Work Assignment No. 42
Contractor: Research Triangle Institute
EPA Task Officer: Todd Kimmell
Prepared by:
Betsy Henry
Analyst,
Hazardous Materials Assessment
ERCO/A Division of ENSECO
205 Alewife Brook Parkway
Cambridge, Massachusetts 02133
June 11, 1986
-------
Introduction
Ruggedness testing is a variation of a factorial experimental design
which assesses the ruggedness of a procedure by systematically introducing
variations in the procedure. Parameters are selected for study and two levels
of each parameter are designated.
A full factorial design would require runs for all possible
combinations of parameters and levels of parameters. Ruggedness testing which
is a fractional factorial design uses only a fraction of -the possible
combinations thereby increasing -the efficiency of the experiment. For example,
a full design with two levels for each of seven variables has 2 or 128 possible
combinations. Ruggedness testing might involve selection of 8 combinations
which would represent 1/16 of the total possible combinations.
Because of its fractional design, ruggedness testing only evaluates the
main effects, eg. the effect of percent headspace on the TCLP recovery of
toluene from ammonia-lime still bottoms. The design assumes that no
interactions exist between parameters; thus labor is saved at the expense of
precision.
Ruggedness testing is invaluable for picking up variations in results
due to small changes in the procedure. Results of ruggedness testing are used
to identify critical parameters in a procedure and to assess the ability of the
method to withstand minor variations in the procedure.
Design of the ZHE TCLP Ruggedness Testing
For ruggedness testing of the zero headspace Toxicity Characteristic
Leaching Procedure (ZHE TCLP), program managers from ERCO and the EPA chose
seven variables and designated two levels of each. Wherever possible, the two
levels represented values on both sides of the protocol value (Table 1).
A set of eight combinations (extractions) was selected so that when
comparing two levels of a parameter, results from all extractions would be used
and the effects of the remaining six parameters would cancel out (Table 2).
The TCLP Draft Protocol was followed with the exception of alterations in-the
parameters under investigation.
Two wastes were chosen for study. Duplicate extractions were done to
enable calculation of standard error and significance. In addition, six blanks
were run to compare the effect of ZHE device on the concentration of volatile
compounds in the blank leachate. Three blanks were run in ADM devices and three
blanks were run in Millipore devices. A total of thirty-eight extractions were
run, ie. 8 extractions x 2 duplicates x 2 wastes + 6 blanks.
-------
Table 1. Parameters and Conditions for the ZHE TCLP Ruggedness Testing.
Parameter
Liquid/solid ratio
% Headspace
Acidity of fluid #1
Device
Collection Method
Aliquotting
Pressure behind piston
Protocol
20:1
0
70 meq
variable
variable
no
5-10 psi
Condition
19:1
0
60 meq
ADM
Syringe
yes
0 psi
1
(A)
(B)
(C)
(D)
(E)
(F)
(G)
Condition 2
21:1
5
60 meq
Millipore
Tedlar bag
no
20 psi
(a)
(b)
(O
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
Table 2. Experimental Design for the ZHE TCLP Ruggedness Testing.
Extraction Number
Parameter
Liquid/solid ratio
% Headspace
Acidity of fluid #1
Device
Collection Method
Aliquotting
Pressure behind piston
1
': ' A
B
C
D
E
F
G
2
A
5
c
D
e
f
g
3
A
b
C
d
E
f'
g
4
A
b
c
d
e
F
G
5
a
B
C
d
e
F
g
6
a
B
c
d
E
f
G
7
a
b
C
D
. e
f
G
8
a
b
c
D
E
F
g
-------
Implementation
The two wastes tested were ammonia-lime still bottoms and a mixture of
API Separator Sludge and Electroplating Waste (API/Erf mixture). The amraonia-
lime still bottoms averaged 94.02 solid while the API/EW. mixture averaged 92.3%
solid as evaluated by filtration with the ZHE device.
Both wastes had initial filtrates which were miscible with water. The
initial filtrates (usually l-2ml in volume) were collected in 5cc syringes and
then placed in 5ml VOA vials. Deionized distilled water was added to the vials
to eliminate headspace. So as not to interfere with the experimental
conditions, the initial filtrates were analyzed separately from the final
filtrates.
Using a direct-drive lab pump, the extraction fluid was pumped into the
ZHE device through Teflon tubing and a septum TEE arrangement at the inlet to
the device. For extractions requiring 5£ headspace, a 25ml volume of air was
pumped into the device prior to introduction of the extraction fluid.
All samples were spiked with a solution of five volatile organic
compounds. The solution contained benzene, toluene, 1,1-dichloroethene,
chlorobenzene, and trichloroethylene each at concentration of 5ug/l. One
hundred microliters of the solution were injected through the septum TEE
arrangement as the extraction fluid was pumped in. To limit the loss of spiked
compounds and required headspace, none, of the devices were vented before
extraction. Pressure behind the pistons was applied as designated and the ZHE
devices were placed in a rotary extractor for 18 hours. -:_^_.
The wastes were filtered as required by the experimental design. For
those samples requiring aliquotting and collection by syringe; a 50cc syringe
was rinsed with the first 10ml of filtrate and the next 50ial were collected for
analysis. For samples requiring complete filtration and collection by syringe,
consecutive 50ml aliquots of filtrate were placed in a 500al Erleruneyer flask.
The filtrate was swirled to mix and 50ml were poured into a VOA vial for
analysis. ;
The six blanks .were run according to TCLP protocol with complete
collection of the final filtrate in a Tedlar bag. Blanks A, B and C were run in
ADM devices while Blanks D, E and F were run in Millipore devices.
Results of the Volatile Analysis
The volatile data are compiled in Tables 3 and 4. Also included'are
the averages of duplicate results and the differences between duplicate results.
The actual data reports for extractions and blanks are in Appendix A. The data
reports for the initial filtrates are in Appendix B.
To determine if a variation in parameter affects the leaching of a
volatile compound by the TCLP, several algebraic manipulations are necessary.
The following example uses benzene results from the extractions of ammonia-lime
still bottoms to examine the significance of liquid/solid ratio on benzene
recovery.
-------
Table 3. Ammonia-Lime Still Bottoms
Volatile Organics Data (yg/1)
Extraction Number
1 2 3 4 .5 6
ERGO ID
Benzene
result
duplicate result
average of
duplicates
difference between
duplicates
Chlorobenzene
result
duplicate result
average of
duplicates
difference between
duplicates
1 , 1 -Di chloroethene
result
duplicate result
average of
duplicates
difference between
duplicates
Toluene
result
duplicate result
average of
duplicates
difference between
duplicates
Trichloroethene
result
duplicate result
average of
duplicates
difference between
duplicates
25687
25688
1,100
950
1,025
150
940
640
790
300
1,100
780
940
320
1,000
690
845
310
930
680
805
'250
25647
25648
920
1,000
960
80
750
860
805
110
860
1,000
930
140
900
1,100
1,000
200
730
860
795
130
27962
27963
660
690
675
30
740
920
830
180
340
540
440
200
700
380
540
320
700
700
700
0
27261
27262
1,000
760
880
240
1,000
730
865
270
640
420
530
220
1,000
750
875
250
970
680
825
290
27964
28002
720
760
740
40
750
810
780
60
^ i
600
370
485
230
860
810
835
50
690
750
720
60
27821
27822
710
610
660
100
770
590
680
180
560
300
430
260
730
590
660
140
660
550
605
110
25754
25755
970
790
880
180
900
770
835
130
1,600
1,200
1,400
400
940
800
870
140
910
730
820
180
25789
25790
600
970
785
370
530
860
720
280
660
1,100
880
440
570
920
745
350
530
830
680
300
-------
Table 4. API Separator Sludge/Electroplating Waste
Volatile Organics Data (ug/D
Extraction Number
1 2 3 4.5 6
ERGO ID
Benzene
result
duplicate
average
difference
Chlorobenzene
result
duplicate
average
difference
1 , 1 -Di chloroethene
result
duplicate
average
difference
Toluene
rtsult
duplicate
average
difference
Tri chloroethene
result
duplicate
average
difference
25753
26010
980
1,000
990
20
180
180
180
0
820
540
680
280
880
880
880
0
240
240
240
0
25788
25894
720
940
830
220
120
160
140
40
440
510
475
70
620
750
685
130 .
170
240
205
70
28660
28661
680
850
765
170
160
210
185
50
100
210
155
110
580
740
660
160
200
340
270
140
28348
28349
600
720
660
120
140
150
145
10
260
125
192.5
135
560
590
575
30
210
220
215
10
28000
28001
630
980
805
350
.160
930
545
770
150
250
200
100
550
830
690
280
180
890
535
710
28456
28457
690
670
680
20
170
170
170
0
130
140
135
10
620
620
620
0
210
200
205
10
26011
26012
820
810
815
10
140
140
140
0
420
420
420
0
670
670
670
0
190
190
190
0
25895
25896
890
840
865
50
190
150
170
40
460
430
445
30
960
730
845
230
240
210
225
30
-------
1. Subtract the average of results at condition a from the
average of results at condition A.
1/4(1,025+960+675+880)-1/4(740+660+880+785)= 118.75
2. Calculate the standard deviation of a single result (s).
r 2
s=il^d where d=difference between duplicate results
I 2k k=number of duplicate results=3
fd2=1502+ 802+ 302+ 2402+ 402+ 1002+ 1802+ 3702 = 268,300
s=4/268.30o' = 129.^9
2x8
3. Calculate the standard error"of the difference between two
averages (S-r).
^H= si(lf where n=number of individual results in each
In average=8
S^= 129.49JT= 64.75
4. Determine the t value at a probability level p=0.01 and eight
degrees of freedom.
^n m o= 3.355, according to Student's t table.
U.Ul,o
t(S-)= 3.355(64.75)= 217.23
d
Therefore, there is a 99% probability that the difference
between averages will fall between -217.23 and 217.23.
5. Compare the difference between averages calculated in Step 1
with the value determined in Step 4. If the absolute value of the
difference between averages is greater than the calculated t(S-)
of Step 4, then the effect is significant.
In this example, the absolute value of 118.75 is less than
217.23 and therefore the effect of a variation in liquid/
solid ratio is not significant for benzene recovery in a
TCLP extraction of ammonia-lime still bottoms.
Similar calculations for each volatile compound and each was' j appear in
Appendix C.
-------
The calculations are based on the concentrations of the spiked
compounds in the final filtrates. Though the initial' filtrates were analyzed
for volatile compounds, the results were not used. The main reason for their
omission is that only the solid portion of the waste was spiked and therefore
only the final filtrates contained spiked compounds. In sone cases, spiked
compounds were detected at low levels in the initial filtrates. Their presence
may have resulted from contamination or the presence of these compounds in the
waste. At any rate, calculations showed that the initial concentrations of the
compounds and the volume of initial filtrate were too small to affect the final
concentrations. For example, the mathematical combination of benzene in the
initial and final filtrates for Extract 4B of the ammonia-lime still bottoms is
as follows:
Concentration of benzene in initial filtrate= 31ug/l
Volume of initial filtrate* 1.6ml diluted to 5.0ml
Concentration of benzene in final filtrate3 760ug/l
Volume, of final filtrate- 467ml
(31ug/L x Q.005L) + (760ug/L x 467L) = 355ug = 760ug/L
0.0016L + 0.467L 0.4686L
The concentration of benzene in the final filtrate and the combined
concentration of benzene irTthe initial and finaTTTltra'te'C^re^th'e^saHeT'
Discussion of Volatile Results
Table 5 summarizes the significant findings for the ZHE TCLP Ruggedness
Testing. The only significant parameter was the choice of device. For both
wastes studied, recovery of 1,1-dichloroethene was higher in the ADM device than
in the Millipore device.
The reason for this difference is believed to be due to observed leaks
in the Millipore device. The Millipore devices repeatedly lost all pressure
from behind the piston during the 18 hour extraction. The loss of pressure
implies that the 0-ring seals or the valve fittings may be faulty. Because
similar seals and valve fittings are found on the top and the bottom of the
device, the presence of a tight seal is a necessity. In several instances, the
Millipore devices leaked extraction fluid from between the top where the
extraction fluid enters the device and the cylinder. In these cases, the
samples were redone. Leakage of volatile compounds would be less easily
detected.
In comparison, the ADM devices retained all pressure applied prior to
extraction. Due to the loss of pressure in the Millipore devices, the parameter
of pressure behind the piston was not sufficiently tested and may actually be
important in TCLP recovery of volatile compounds.
Whatever factors are involved with reduced recovery in the .Millipore
device, the volatility of the compounds appears to be important. 1,1-
-------
Table 5. Summary of Volatile Organlcs Results
for the Ruggedness Testing of the ZHE TCLP*
Parameter
Waste
Liquid/
solid
ratio
Head-
space
Acidity
of
Fluid #1
Device
Collection
Method
Aliquotting
Pressure
behind
Piston
Ammonia-
Lime Still
Bottoms
API Separator
Sludge/Electro-
plating Waste
1,1-Dichloroethene
(D>d)
1,1-Dichloroethene
(D>d)
00
*The TCLP recovery of volatile organics appearing
in the designated parameter. The (D>d) notations expl,ai:
condition d. Conditions are defined as follows:
in this table is significantly affected by variations
Lns that condition D resulted in a higher recovery than
Parameter
Condition 1
Condition 2
Liquid/solid ratio
% Headspace
Acidity of Fluid #1
Device
Collection Method
Aliquotting
Pressure behind Piston
19:1
0
60} meq.
ADM
syringe
yes
0 psi
(A)
(B)
(0)
(D)
(E)
(F)
(G)
21:1
5
80 meq
Millipore
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Tedlar bag (e)
no (f)
20 psi (g)
-------
1,1-Dichloroethene is the most volatile of the five spiked compounds. The least
volatile compound, chlorobenzene, experienced the least variation in recovery
between the two devices.
The parameter of headspace did not significantly affect recovery of
volatile compounds. Therefore, the ability of the devices to eliminate
headspace does not appear to be crucial.
The blanks showed little evidence of contamination. Tetrachloroethene
was present at 44 and llppb in two of the blanks. The remaining blanks
contained none of the volatile compounds on the Hazardous Substance List.
Other than the choice of device, variations in the parameters did not
seem to significantly affect TCLP recovery of volatile compounds. The TCLP
protocol may be considered to be adequately rugged with respect to the
parameters .investigated with the exception of device.
Conclusion
The results of the ZHE TCLP Ruggedness Testing suggest that one
parameter, the ZHE device, is critical particularly for highly volatile
compounds. As indicated above, the reason for this observation is believed to
be the presence of leaks in the Millipore device.
As a fractional factorial design, ruggedness testing assumes that the
parameters are independent. In practice, the parameters are likely to interact.
Additional work such as doubling the number of extractions in the experimental
design would help to differentiate main effects from interactions.
-------
CLIENT: HWMSS-42
SAMPLE RECEIVED: 01/21/86
ANALYSIS COMPLETED: 01/30/86
RESULTS IN: ug/l (PPb
' REPORTED BY: CTFNN
CHECKED BY: N5
ERCO/A
Division of ENSECO
VOLATILE ORGAWICS ANALYSIS
)
BY
-
EPA METHOD 624
Data Report -
Page 1 of 2
Minimum
reporting
Compound limit
Chloromethane
Bromomethane
Vinyl chloride
Chloroethane
Methylene chloride
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
1 , 1-Dichloroethene
1 , 1-Di chloroethane
trans-1 ,2-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
1 ,2-Di chloroethane
2-Butanone .
1,1,1 -Tri chloroethane
Carbon tetra chloride-- ~
Vinyl acetate
Bromodi Chloromethane
1 ,2-Dichloropropane
trans-1 , 3-Dichloropropene
Trichloroethene
Dibromochloromethane :
1 , 1 ,2-Trichloroethane
Benzene
cis-1 , 3-Dichloropropene
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
Bromoform
2-Hexanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Tetrachloroethene
1,1,2, 2-Tetra chloroethane
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
Styrene
Total xylenes
5
5
5
5
5
50
2
2
2
2
2
2
10
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
10
10
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Extract
Client ID: 1A-(AL)
ERGO ID: 25687
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
290
ND
1,100
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
- ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
930
ND
ND
1,100
ND
ND
ND.
ND
ND
11
ND
1,000
940
ND
ND
ND
Extract
IB-(AL)
25688
ND .
ND
ND
ND
ND
*
ND
780
ND
ND
ND
ND.
ND
NO'
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
680
ND
ND
950
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
690
640
ND
ND
ND
ND = Not detected.
*Trace concentrations detected below minimum reporting limit.
-------
CLIENT:' HWMSS-42
Extract
Additional Client ID: 1A-(AL)
compounds ERGO ID: 25687
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS
BY EPA METHOD 624
- Data Report -
Page 2 of 2
Extract
IB-(AL)
25688
Unknowns (See attached sheet) X
X
Dilution factor : . . 5
5
Multiply minimum reporting limit by dilution factor to obtain true minimum limit,
X - Present.
Surrogate
Recoveries
% Recovery d^-l^-Dichloroethane
91
97
% Recovery d8-Toluene
111
100
-------
CLIENT: HWMSS-42
CLIENT ID: 25687
ERGO ID: Extract 1A (AL)
REPORTED BY:
CHECKED BY:
ERCO/A Division of ENSECO
ORGANICS ANALYSIS
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
BY EPA METHOD 624
- Data Report -
Compound name
Fraction Scan no.
Estimated
concentration
(ug/D
Naphthalene
Butanoic acid,l-methylethylester
VOA
VOA
1,079
999
370
440
-------
CLIENT: HWMSS-42
CLIENT ID: 25688
ERGO ID: Extract IB (AL)
REPORTED BY: _
CHECKED BY:
ERCO/A Division of ENSECO
ORGANICS ANALYSIS
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
BY-EPA METHOD 624
- Data Report -
Compound name
Fraction. Scan no.
Estimated
concentration
(yg/1)
Butanoic acid, 1-methylethylester
Naphthalene
VOA
VOA
999
1,079
470
-------
CLIENT : HWMSS-42
SAMPLE RECEIVED: 01/20/86
ANALYSIS COMPLETED: 01/30/86
"RESULTS IN: ug/i (ppb)
REPORTED BY: PTA/jfM
CHECKED BY: N$
ERCO/A
Division of ENSECO
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS
BY
EPA METHOD 624
Data Report -
Page 1 of 2
Minimum
reporting
Compound limit
Chi orome thane 5
Bromome thane 5
Vinyl chloride 5
Chloroe thane 5
Methylene chloride 5
Acetone 50
Carbon disulfide 2
1 , 1-Dichloroethene 2
1 , 1-Dichloroethane 2
trans-l,2-Dichloroethene 2
Chloroform 2
1,2-Dichloroethane 2
2-Butanone 10
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 2
Carbon tetra chloride 2
Vinyl acetate 2
Bromodichloromethane 2
1,2-Dichloropropane 2
trans-l,3-Dichloropropene 2
Trichloroethene 2
Dibromochloromethane 2
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 2
Benzene 2
cis-1 , 3-Dichloropropene 2
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether 2
Bromofonn 2
2-Hexanone 10
4-Methyl-2-pentanone 10
Tetrachloroethene 2
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 2
Toluene '2
Chlorobenzene 2
Ethylbenzene 2
Styrene 2
Total xylenes 2
Client ID: Extract 2A-(AL) Extract 2B-(AL)
ERGO ID: 2.5647
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
860
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
730
ND
ND
920
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
900
750
ND
ND
ND
25648
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1,000
ND
ND
NiJ
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
860
ND
ND
1,000
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1,100
860
ND
ND
ND
ND = Not detected.
-------
CLIENT:- HWMSS-42
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS
BY. EPA METHOD 624
- Data Report -
Page 2 of 2
Additional Client ID:
compounds ERGO ID:
Extract 2A-(AL) Extract 2B-(AL)
25647 25648
Butanoic acid l-methylethylestera
490 UO
Dilution factor:
5 5
Multiply minimum reporting limit by dilution factor to obtain true minimum limit,
Calculated with an RF. of 1.0. Identification based on reference spectra.
Surrogate
Recoveries
% Recovery d^-l^-Dichlor.oetnane
97
96
% Recovery dg-Toluene
110
105
-------
CLIENT: HWMSS-42
ERCO/A Division of ENSECO
SAMPLE RECEIVED: 03/10/86
ANALYSIS COMPLETED: 04/04/86
RESULTS IN: yg/1 (ppb)
' REPORTED BY: TF*
CHECKED BY: ^
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS
BY EPA METHOD 624
- Data Report -
Page 1 of 2
Minimum
reporting
Compound limit
Chloromethane 5
Bromomethane 5
Vinyl chloride 5
Chloroethane 5
Methylene chloride 5
Acetone 50
Carbon disulfide 2
1,1-Dichloroethene 2
1,1-Di chloroethane 2
trans -1,2-Dichloroethene 2
Chloroform 2
1,2-Di chloroethane 2
2-Butanone 10
1 , 1 , 1 -Tri chloroethane 2
Carbon tetra chloride 2
Vinyl acetate 2
Bromodi chloromethane 2
1,2-Dichloropropane 2
trans-l,3-Dichloropropene 2
Trichloroethene 2
Dibromochloromethane 2
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 2
Benzene 2
cis-l,3-Dichloropropene 2
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether 2
Bromoform 2
2-Hexanone 10
4-Methyl-2-pentanone 10
Tetrachloroethene 2
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 2
Toluene 2
Chlorobenzene 2
Ethylbenzene 2
Styrene 2
Total xylenes 2
Extract Extract
Client ID: 3A (AL) 3B (AL)
ERGO ID: 27962 27963
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND 360
ND ND
340 540
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
vrpi \.IT\
ND Nar^.-
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
700 700
ND ND
ND ND
660 690
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
16 ND
ND . ND
700 380
740 920
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND = Not detected.
-------
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS
BY EPA METHOD 624
- Data Report -
CLIENT: HWMSS-42 Page 2 of 2
Additional
compounds
Uhlmown
Extract
Client ID: 3A (AL)
ERGO ID: 27962
X
Extract
3B (AL)
27963
X
Dilution factor:
Multiply minimum reporting limit by dilution factor to obtain true minimum limit,
X = Present. ___ _______
Surrogate
Recoveries
% Recovery d^-l^-Dichloroethane 95 99
% Recovery d8-Toluene 98 53
-------
CLIENT: HWMSS-42
ERCO/A Division of ENSECO
SAMPLE RECEIVED: 03/03/86
ANALYSIS COMPLETED: 04/02786
RESULTS IN: yg/1
REPORTED BY: DJ\V
CHECKED BY: NS
Compound
Chlorome thane
Bromomethane
Vinyl chloride
Chloroethane
Methylene chloride
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
1 , 1-Dichloroethene
1 , 1-Di chloroe thane
trans -1 , 2-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
1,2-Di chloroethane
2-Butanone
1 , 1 , 1 -Tri chloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Vinyl acetate
Bromodi chloromethane
1 , 2-Dichloropropane
trans-1 , 3-Dichloropropene
Tri chloroe thene
Dibromochloromethane :
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Benzene
cis-1, 3-Dichloropropene
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
Bromof onn
2-Hexanone
4-Methy 1 -2 -pent anone
Tetra chloroe thene
1 , 1 ,2 ,2-Tetra chloroethane
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
Styrene
Total xylenes
(ppb)
/ JFn
Minimum
reporting Client ID:
limit ERGO ID:
5
5
5
5
5
50
2
2
2
21
2
2
10
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
10
10
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS
BY
-
Extract
U (AL)
27261
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
640
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
970
ND
ND
1,000
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1,000
1,000
ND
ND
ND
EPA METHOD 624
Data Report -
Page 1 of 2
Extract
4B (AL)
27262
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
420
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
680
ND
ND
760
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
750
730
ND
ND
ND
ND = Not detected.
-------
CLIENT: HWMSS-42
VOLATILE ORQANICS ANALYSIS
BY EPA METHOD 624
- Data. Report -
Page 2 of 2
Additional
compounds
Unknown hydrocarbon
Client ID:.
ERGO ID:
Extract 4A (AL)
27261
X
Extract 4B (AL)
27262
X
Dilution factor:
25
10
Multiply minimum reporting limit by dilution factor to obtain true minimum limit.
X = Present.
Surrogate
Recoveries
% Recovery d^-l^-Dichloroethane
96
93
% Recovery ds-Toluene
100
103
-------
CLIENT: HWMSS-42
ERCO/A Division of ENSECO
SAMPLE RECEIVED: 03/10/86
ANALYSIS COMPLETED: 04/04/86
. RESULTS IN: ug/l
REPORTED BY: 3TM
CHECKED BY: ^5»
(ppb)
VOLATILE ORGANICS
BY EPA METHOD
- Data Report
Page 1 of 2
ANALYSIS
624
Compound
Chloromethane
Bromomethane
Vinyl chloride
Chloroethane
Methylene chloride
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
1 , 1-Dichloroethene
1 , 1-Di chloroethane
trans-l,2-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
1,2-Di chloroethane
2-Butanone
1 , l~,i-Tri chloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Vinyl acetate
Bromodi chloromethane
1,2-Di chloropropane
trans-1 , 3-Dichloropropene
Trichloroethene
Dibromochloromethane ;
1,1,2 -Tri chloroethane
Benzene
cis-1 , 3-Dichloropropene
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
Bromoform
2-Hexanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Tetrachloroethene
1,1,2, 2-Tetra chloroethane
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
Styrene
Total xylenes
Minimum
reporting
limit
5
5
5
5
5
50
2
2
2
2
2
2
' 10
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
10
10
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Extract
Client ID: 5A (AL)
ERGO ID: 27964
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
600
ND
ND
12
ND
ND
- --.- ND -
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
690
ND
ND
720
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
10
ND
860
750
ND
ND
ND
ND = Not detected.
-------
CLIENT: HWMSS-42
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS
BY EPA METHOD 624
- Data Report -
Page 2 of 2
Extract
Additional Client ID: 5A (AL)
confounds ERCO ID: 27964
Unknown X
Dilution factor: 5
Multiply minimum reporting limit by dilution factor to obtain true minimum limit.
X = Present.. ;___..
Surrogate
Recoveries
% Recovery dit-l^-Dichloroethane
86
% Recovery de-Toluene
115
-------
ERCO/^OENSECO
J.VCORPOR.-UED
CLIENT:
CLIENT ID:
ERGO ID:
SAMPLE RECEIVED:
ANALYSIS COMPLETED:
HWMSS-42
5B (AL)
28002
03/11/86
05/06/86
RESULTS IN: ug/l (ppb)
SUMMARY OF ORGANIC
PRIORITY POLLUTANT ANALYSIS
VOLATILE ORGANIC
COMPOUNDS
- Data Report -
Compound
Result
Compound
Result
Chlorome thane
Bromomethane
Vinyl chloride
Chloroethane
Methylene chloride
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,1-Dichloroethane
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
1,2-Dichloroethane
2-Butanone
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Vinyl acetate
Bromodi chloromethane
<25 1,2-Dichloropropane
<25 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
<25 Trichloroethene
<25 Dibromochloromethane
<25 1,1,2-Trichloroethane
<250 Benzene
<10 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
370 2-Chloroethylvinylether
<10 Bromofonn
<10 4-Methyl-2-pentanone
<10 2-Hexanone
<10 Tetrachloroethene
<50 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
<50 Toluene
<10 Chlorobenzene
<10 Ethylbenzene
<10 Styrene
Total xylenes
750
760
<50
<50
810
810
Reported by:
Checked by:
SURROGATE RECOVERIES (%\
d^-l^-dichloroethane 91
d8-toluene 102
-------
CLIENT : HWMSS-42
SAMPLE RECEIVED: 03/06/86
ANALYSIS COMPLETED: 04/H/86
RESULTS IN: ug/l (ppb)
REPORTED BY: JFM
CHECKED BY: W$
ERCO/A
Division of ENSECO
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS
BY
_
EPA METHOD 624
Data Report -
Page 1 of 2
Minimum
reporting
Compound limt
Chloromethane 5
Bromomethane 5
Vinyl chloride 5
Chlrroethane 5
Methylene chloride 5
Acetone 50
Carbon disulfide 2
1 , 1-Dichloroethene 2
1 , 1-Dichloroethane 2
trans-l,2-Dichloroethene 2
Chloroform 2
1,2-Dichloroethane 2
2-Butanom . 10
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 2
Carbon tetrachloride 2
Vinyl acetate 2
Bromodichloromethane 2
1,2-Dichloropropane 2
trans-l,3-Dichloropropene 2
Trichloroethene 2
Dibromochloromethane 2
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 2
Benzene 2
cis-l,3-Dichloropropene 2
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether 2
Bromoform 2
2-Hexanone 10
4-Methyl-2-pentanone 10
Tetrachloroethene 2
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 2
Toluene 2
Chlorobenzene 2
Ethylbenzene 2
Styrene 2
Total xylenes 2
Extract
Client ID: 6A(AL)
ERCO ID: 27821
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
560
ND
ND
10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
660
ND
ND
710
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
730
770
ND
*
ND
Extract
6B(AL)
27822
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
300
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
550
ND
ND
610
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
590
590
ND
ND
ND
ND = Not detected.
*Trace concentrations detected below minimum reporting limit.
-------
CLIENT:- HWMSS-42
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS
BY. EPA METHOD 624
\
- Data Report -
2 of 2
Additional
compounds .
Unknown hydrocarbons
Client ID:
ERGO ID:
Extract
6A(AL)
27821
X
Extract
6B(AL)
27822
X
Dilution factor:
Multiply minimum reporting limit by dilution factor to obtain true minimum limit.
X = Present.
Surrogate
Recoveries
% Recovery d^-l^-Dichloroethane 104
93
% Recovery d8-Toluene
96
101
-------
CLIENT : HWMSS-42
ERCO/A
Division of ENSECO
SAMPLE RECEIVED: 01/22/86
ANALYSIS COMPLETED: 02/04/86
RESULTS IN: ug/1
REPORTED BY: JFA1
CHECKED BY: ^
Compound
Chlorome thane
Bromome thane
Vinyl chloride
Chloroe thane
Methylene chloride
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
1 ,1-Di chloroe thene
1 , 1-Dichloroethane
trans-1 ,2-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
1 , 2 -Di chloroe thane
2-Butanone
1 , 1 , 1-Tri chloroe thane
Carbon tetrachloride
Vinyl acetate
Bromodichloromethane
1 ,2-Dichloropropane
trans-1 ,3-Dichloropropene
Trichloroethene
Dibromochloromethane
1 ,1 ,2-Trichloroethane
Benzene
cis-1 ,3-Dichloropropene
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
Bromofonn
2-Hexanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Tetrachloroethene
1 , 1 ,2 ,2-Tetrachloroe thane
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
Styrene
Total xylenes
(ppb)
Minimum
reporting Client ID:
limit ERGO ID:
5
5.
5
5
5
50
2
2
2
2
2
2
10
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
10
10
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS
BY
_
Extract
7A-(AL)
25754
ND
ND
ND-
ND
ND
ND
ND
1,600
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
910
ND
ND
970
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
940
900
ND
ND
ND
EPA METHOD 624
Data Report -
Page 1 of 2
Extract
7B-(AL)
25755
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1,200
ND
ND
ND
ND
210
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
730
ND
ND
790
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
110
ND
800
770
ND
ND
ND
ND = Not detected.
-------
CLIENT: HWMSS-42
Propyl benzene isomer
73
VOLATILE ORQANICS ANALYSIS
BY EPA METHOD 624
- Data Report -
Page 2 of 2
Additional Client ID:
compounds ERGO ID:
Butanoic acid 1-methylethylester
Extract
7A-(ALJ
25754 f
470
Extract
7B-(AL)
25755
400
ND
Propyl benzene isomer
37
ND
Dilution factor:
Multiply minimum reporting limit by dilution factor to obtain true minimum limit,
Surrogate
Recoveries
% Recovery
112
110
% Recovery dg-Toluene
98
100
-------
CLIENT: HWMSS-42
SAMPLE RECEIVED: 01/23/86
ANALYSIS COMPLETED: 02/04/86
RESULTS IN: ug/l (PP
REPORTED BY: JFN\
CHECKED BY: N$
ERCO/A Division of
ENSECO
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS
b) BY EPA METHOD 624
- Data Report
Page 1 of 2
_
Minimum
reporting
Compound
Chloromethane
Bromomethane
Vinyl chloride
Chloroethane
Methylene chloride
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
1 , 1-Dichloroethene
1 , 1-Di chloroethane
trans-1, 2-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
1 ,2-Di chloroethane
2-Butanone
1 , 1 ,1-Trichloroethane
Carton tetrachloride
Vinyl acetate
Bromodi chloromethane
1 ,2-Dichloropropane
trans-1 , 3-Dichloropropene
Tri chloroethene
Dibromochloromethane :
1 , 1 ,2-Trichloroethane
Benzene
cis-1 , 3-Dichloropropene
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
Bromoform
2-Hexanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Tetrachloroethene
1 ,1 ,2.,2-Tetrachloroethane
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
Styrene
Total xylenes
limit
5
5
5
5
5
50
2
2
2
2
2
2
10
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
10
10
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Extract
Client ID: 8A-(AL)
ERCO ID: 25789
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
660
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
530
ND
ND
600
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
570
580
ND
ND
ND
Extract
8B-(AL)
25790
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1,100
ND
ND
ND
ND
160
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
830
ND
ND
970
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
130
ND
920
860
ND
ND
ND
ND = Not detected.
-------
CLIENT: HWMSS-42
Alkyl benzene
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS
BY EPA METHOD 624
- Data Report -
Page 2 of 2
Additional
compounds
Unknown hydrocarbons
Extract
Client ID: 8A-(AL)
ERGO ID: 25789
X
Extract
8B-(AL)
25790
X
ND
Dilution factor:
Multiply minimum reporting limit by dilution factor to obtain true minimum limit,
X = Present.
Surrogate
Recoveries
% Recovery d^-l^-Dichloroethane
108
95
% Recovery d8-Toluene
96
100
-------
CLIENT: HWMSS-42
ERCO/A Division of ENSECO
SAMPLE RECEIVED: 01/22/86
ANALYSIS COMPLETED: 02/04/86
. RESULTS IN: UR/1 (PPb)
REPORTED BY: JF/*1
CHECKED BY: N 5
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS
BY EPA METHOD 624
- Data Report -
Page 1 of 2
Minimum
reporting
Compound limit
Chlorome thane 5
Bromomethane 5
Vinyl chloride ' 5
Chloroethane 5
Methylene chloride 5
Acetone 50
Carbon disulfide 2
1 , 1-Dichloroethene 2
1 , 1-Dichloroethane 2
trans-l,2-Dichloroethene 2
Chloroform 2
1, 2 -Di Chloroethane 2
2-Butanone 10
1,1, 1-Trichloroethane 2
Carbon tetrachloride 2
Vinyl acetate 2
Bromodichloromethane 2
1,2-Dichloropropane 2
trans-1 , 3-Dichloropropene 2
Trichloroethene , 2
Dibromochloromethane 2
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 2
Benzene 2
cis-1, 3-Dichloropropene 2
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether 2
Bromoform 2
2-Hexanone 10
4-Methyl-2-pentanone 10
Tetrachloroethene 2
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 2
Toluene 2
Chlorobenzene 2
Ethylbenzene 2
Styrene 2
Total xylenes 2
Extract
Client ID: 1A-(SS)
ERGO ID: 25753
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
820
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
- - -- ND -
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
. 240
ND
ND
980
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
20
ND
880
180
180
ND
1,900
ND = Not detected.
-------
CLIENT: HWMSS-42
Propyl benzene isomer
110
VOUTILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS
BY EPA METHOD 624
- Data Report -
Page 2 of 2
Additional Client ID:
compoxjnds ERGO ID-:
Butanoic acid 1-metnylethyl ester
Extract
U-(SS)
25753
250
Propyl benzene isomer
65
Dilution factor:
Multiply minimum reporting limit by dilution factor to obtain true minimum limit,
Surrogate
Recoveries
% Recovery d^-l^-Dichloroethane
106
% Recovery dg-Toluene
100
-------
CLIENT : HWMSS-42
ERCO/A Division of ENSECO
SAMPLE RECEIVED: 01/29/86
ANALYSIS COMPLETED: 02/05/86
RESULTS IN: ug/l
'REPORTED BY: OTtt
CHECKED BY: NS
Compound
Chlorome thane
Bromomethane
Vinyl chloride
Chloroe thane
Methylene chloride
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
1 , 1-Di chloroe thene
1 , 1-Di chloroethane
trans-1 ,2-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
1 , 2 -Di chloroe thane
2-Butanone
1 ,1,1-Trichloroe thane
Carbon tetrachloride
Vinyl acetate
Bromodi chloromethane
1 , 2 -Di chloropropane
trans-1 ,3-Dichloropropene
Trichloroe thene
Dibromochloromethane :
1,1,2 -Tri chloroethane
Benzene
cis-1 ,3-Dichloropropene
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
Bromoform
2-Hexanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Tetrachloroethene
1 ,1 ,2 ,2-Tetrachloroethane
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
Styrene
Total xylenes
(ppb)
Minimum
reporting
limit
5
5
5
5
5
50
2
2
2
2
2
2
10
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
10
10
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS
BY EPA METHOD 624
- Data Report -
Page 1 of 2
Extract
Client ID: IB-(SS)
ERGO ID: 26010
ND
ND
ND
ND
33
ND
- ' ND
540
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
240
ND
ND
1,000
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
880
180
180
ND
1,200
ND = Not detected.
-------
CLIENT : HWMSS-42
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS
BY EPA METHOD 624
- Data Report -
Page 2 of 2
Extract
Additional Client ID: IB-(SS)
compounds ERGO ID: 26010
Unknown hydrocarbons X
Alkyl benzenes X
Dilution factor: 5
Multiply minimum reporting limit by dilution factor to obtain true minimum limit.
X = Present.
Surrogate
Recoveries
% Recovery d^l,2-Dichloroethane
107
% Recovery de-Toluene
103
-------
CLIENT: HWMSS-42
ERCO/A Division of ENSECO
SAMPLE RECEIVED: 01/23/86
ANALYSIS COMPLETED: 02/04/86
RESULTS IN: ug/l (ppb)
'REPORTED BY: 3?f\
CHECKED BY: A/S
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS
BY EPA METHOD 624
- Data Report -
Page 1 of 2
Minimum
reporting
Compound limit
Chloromethane 5
Bromomethane 5
Vinyl chloride 5
Chloroethane . 5
Methylene chloride 5
Acetone 50
Carbon disulfide 2
1 , 1-Dichloroethene 2
1,1-Dichloroethane 2
trans-l,2-Dichloroethene 2
Chloroform 2
1,2-Di Chloroethane 2
2-Butanone 10
l,l,l-TrichlorQe,thane 2
Carbon tetrachloride 2
Vinyl acetate 2
Bromodichloromethane 2
1,2-Di chloropropane 2
trans-l,3-Dichloropropene 2
Trichloroethene 2
Dibromochloromethane 2
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 2
Benzene 2
cis-l,3-Dichloropropene 2
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether 2
Bromoform. 2
2-Hexanone 10
4-Methyl-2-pentanone 10
Tetrachloroethene 2
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 2
Toluene 2
Chlorobenzene 2
Ethylbenzene 2
Styrene 2
Total xylenes 2
Extract
Client ID: 2A-(SS)
ERGO ID: 25788
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
440
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
170
ND
ND
720
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
620
120
130
ND
840
ND = Not detected.
-------
CLIENT : HWMSS-42
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS
BY EPA METHOD 624
- Data Report -
Page 2 of 2
Extract
Additional Client ID: 2A-ISS)
compounds ERGO ID: 25788
Unknown hydrocarbons X
Alkyl benzene X
Dilution factor: 5
Multiply minimum reporting limit by dilution factor to obtain true minimum limit,
X = Present.
Surrogate
Recoveries
% Recovery d4-l,2-Dichloroethane
108
% Recovery d8-Toluene
98
-------
CLIENT: HWMSS-42
ERCO/A Division of ENSECO
SAMPLE RECEIVED: 01/27/86
ANALYSIS COMPLETED: 02/05/86
RESULTS IN: ug/l (ppb)
REPORTED BY: 3TM
CHECKED BY: NS
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS
BY EPA METHOD 624
- Data Report -
Page 1 of 2
Minimum
reporting
Compound limit
Chloromethane 5
Bromomethane 5
Vinyl chloride 5
Chloroethane 5
Methylene chloride 5
Acetone 50
Carbon disulfide 2
1,1-Dichloroethene 2
1 , 1-Di chloroethane 2
trans -1,2-Dichloroethene 2
Chloroform 2
1,2-Dichloroethane 2
2-Butanone 10
1,1,1-Tri chloroethane 2
Carbon tetrachloride 2
Vinyl acetate 2
Bromodi chloromethane 2
1,2-Dichloropropane 2
trans-l,3-Dichloropropene 2
Trichloroethene 2
Dibromochloromethane ; 2
1,1,2-Tri chloroethane 2
Benzene 2
cis-l,3-Dichloropropene 2
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether 2
Bromoform 2
2-Hexanone 10
4-Methyl-2-pentanone 10
Tetrachloroethene 2
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 2
Toluene 2
Chlorobenzene 2
Ethylbenzene 2
Styrene 2
Total xylenes ' .2
Extract
Client ID: 2B-(SS)
ERCO ID: 25894
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
510
ND
ND
ND
ND
170
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
240
ND
ND
940
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
750
160
150
ND
1,000
ND = Not detected.
-------
CLIENT: HWMSS-42
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS
BY EPA METHOD 624
- Data Report -
Page 2 of 2
Extract
Additional Client ID: 2B-(SS)
compounds ERGO ID: 25894
Unknown hydrocarbons X
Alliyl benzene X
Dilution factor: 5
Multiply minimum reporting limit by dilution factor to obtain true minimum limit,
X = Present.
Surrogate
Recoveries
% Recovery d^-l^-Dichloroethane
97
% Recovery d8-Toluene
98
-------
ENSECO
INCORPORATED
CLIENT:
CLIENT ID:
ERGO ID:
SAMPLE RECEIVED:
ANALYSIS COMPLETED:
HWMSS-42
Extract 3A (SS)
28660
03/21/86
04/15/86
RESULTS IN: ug/l (ppb)
SUMMARY OF ORGANIC
PRIORITY POLLUTANT ANALYSIS
VOLATILE ORGANIC
COMPOUNDS
- Data Report -
Compound
Result
Compound
Result
Chloromethane
Bromomethane
Vinyl chloride
Chloroethane
Methylene chloride
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,1-Dichloroethane
trans-1,2-Di chloroethene
Chloroform
1,2-Dichloroethane
2-Butanone
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Vinyl acetate
Bromodichloromethane
<25 1,2-Dichloropropane
<25 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
<25 Trichloroethene
<25 Dibromochloromethane
<25 1,1,2-Trichloroethane
<250 Benzene
<10 cis-l,3-Dichloropropene
100 2-Chloroethylvinylether
<10 Bromoform
<10 4-Methyl-2-pentanone
<10 2-Hexanone
<10 Tetrachloroethene
<50 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
<10 Toluene
<10 Chlorobenzene
<10 Ethylbenzene
<10 Styrene
Total xylenes
200
680
<50
<50
580
160
110
1,100
Reported by:
Checked by:
SURROGATE RECOVERIES (%)
d^-l,2-dichloroethane 97
d-toluene 102
-------
ERCO/
A D/V/S>C*S' Of
ENSECO
/.VCORPORWD
CLIENT:
CLIENT ID:
ERCO ID:
SAMPLE RECEIVED:
ANALYSIS COMPLETED:
HWMSS-42
Extract 3B (SS)
28661
03/21/86
04/14/86
RESULTS IN: ug/l (ppb)
SUMMARY OF ORGANIC
PRIORITY POLLUTANT ANALYSIS
VOLATILE ORGANIC
COMPOUNDS
- Data Report -
Compound
Result
Compound
Result
Chloromethane
Bromomethane
Vinyl chloride
Chloroethane
Methylene chloride
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
1,1-Di chloroethene
1,1-DiChloroethane
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
L, 2 -=Di Chloroethane
2-Butanone
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Vinyl acetate
Bromodi chloromethane
<25 1,2-Dichloropropane
<25 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
<25 Trichloroethene
<25 Dibromochloromethane
<25 1,1,2-Trichloroethane
<250 Benzene
<10 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
210 2-Chloroethylvinylether
<10 Bromoform
<10 4-Methyl-2-pentanone
<10 2-Hexanone
<10 Tetrachloroethene ._
<50 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
<10 Toluene
<10 Chlorobenzene
<10 Ethylbenzene
<10 Styrene
Total xylenes
340
850
<50
<50
740
210
140
1,300
Reported by:
Checked by:
SURROGATE RECOVERIES (%\
1,2-di Chloroethane 96
toluene 97
-------
/.\'CORPORAT£D
CLIENT:
CLIENT ID:
ERGO ID:
SAMPLE RECEIVED:
ANALYSIS COMPLETED:
RESULTS IN:
HWMSS-42
Extract 4A (SS)
28348
03/17/86
04/12/86
ug/1 (ppb)
SUMMARY OF ORGANIC
PRIORITY POLLUTANT ANALYSIS
VOLATILE ORGANIC
COMPOUNDS
- Data Report -
Compound
Jtesult
Compound
Result
Chloromethane
Bromomethane
Vinyl chloride
Chloroethane
Methylene chloride
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,1-Dichloroethane
trans-l,2-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
1,2-Dichloroethane
2-Butanone
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Vinyl acetate
Bromodichloromethane
<25 1,2-Dichloropropane <10
<25 trans -1,3-Dichloropropene <10
<25 . . Trichloroethene ----------------- 210
<25 Dibromochloromethane <10
<25 1,1,2-Trichloroethane <10
<250 Benzene ------------------------- 600
<10 cis-l,3-Dichloropropene
- 260 2-Chloroethylvinylether
<10 Bromoform
<10 4-Methyl-2-pentanone
25 2-Hexanone
<10 Tetrachloroethene
<50 . 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
<10 Toluene --------------------- - --- 560
<10 Chlorobenzene ------------------- 140
<10 Ethylbenzene ----------- - -------- 120
<10 Styrene <10
Total xylenes ----------------- 1,200
<10
<10
<50
<50
<10
.Reported by:
Checked by:
SURROGATE RECOVERIES (%)
d^-1,2-dichloroethane 175
dg-toluene 94
-------
/.NC'ORPORAffD
CLIENT:
CLIENT ID:
ERGO ID:
SAMPLE RECEIVED:
ANALYSIS COMPLETED:
RESULTS IN:
HWMSS-42
Extract 4B (SSI
28349
03/17/86
0^/12/86
ug/1 (ppb)
SUMMARY OF ORGANIC
PRIORITY POLLUTANT ANALYSIS
VOLATILE ORGANIC
COMPOUNDS
- Data Report -
Compound
Result Compound
Result
Chlorome thane
Bromomethane
Vinyl chloride
Chloroethane
Methylene chloride
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,1-DIchloroethane
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
1,2-Di chloroethane
2-Butanone
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Vinyl acetate
Bromodichloromethane
<25
<25
<25
<25
<25
<250
125
10
<10
<50
1,2-Dichloropropane
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
Trichloroethene
Dibromochloromethane
1,1,2-Tri chloroethane
Benzene
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
2-Chloroethylvinylether
Bromofonn
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
2-Hexanone
Tetra chloroethene - -_
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
Serene
Total xylenes
<10
<10
220
720
<50
590
150
120
<10
,000
Reported by:
Checked by:
SURROGATE RECOVERIES (%): d^-1,2-dichloroethane 115
d8-toluene 6
-------
CLIENT: HWMS5-42
CLIENT ID:- Extract 5 A (SS)
ERCO ID: 28000
SAMPLE RECEIVED: 03/11/86
ANALYSIS COMPLETED: 04/18/86
RESULTS IN: ug/l (ppb)
ERCO/A Division of ENSECO
. SUMMARY OF ORGANIC
PRIORITY POLLUTANT ANALYSIS
VOLATILE ORGANIC
COMPOUNDS
- Data Report -
Compound
Minimum
reporting
Result limit Compound
Minimum
reporting
Result limit
Chloromethane ND 5
Bromomethane ND 5
Vinyl chloride ND 5
Chloroethane ND 5
Methylene chloride ND 5
Acetone ND 50
Carbon disulfide ND 2
1,1-Dichloroethene ' 150 2
1,1-Dichloroethane ND 2
trans-l,2-Dichloroethene ND 2
Chloroform 'ND ~ 2
1,2-Di chloroethane ND 2
2-Butanone ND 10
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND 2
Carbon tetrachloride ND 2
Vinyl acetate ; ND 2
BromodiChloromethane ND 2
1,2-Dichloropropane ND 2
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 2
Trichloroethene 180 2
Dibromochloromethane ND 2
1,1,2-Triohloroethene ND 2
Benzene . 630 2
cis-l,3-Dichloropropene ND 2
2-Chloroethylvinylether ND 2
Bromoform ND 2
4-Methyl-2-pentanone ND 10
2-Hexanone ND . 10
Tetrachloroethene ND 2
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 2
Toluene 550 2
Chlorobenzene 160 2
Ethylbenzene 97 2
Styrene ND 2
Total xylenes 930 2
Multiply minimum reporting limit by dilution factor to obtain
true minimum limit.
Dilution factor: 10.
ND = Not detected above the true minimum limit.
Reported by:
Checked by:
SURROGATE RECOVERIES (%}: ^-1,2-dichloroethane
d8-toluene
97
98
COMMENTS; Untaown hydrocarbons present.
-------
CLIENT:
CLIENT ID:
ERCO ID:
SAMPLE RECEIVED:
ANALYSIS COMPLETED:
HWMSS-42
Extract 5B (SS)
28001
03/11/86
04/05/86
RESULTS IN: ug/1 (ppb)
ERCO/A Division of ENSECO
SUMMARY OF ORGANIC
PRIORITY POLLUTANT ANALYSIS
VOLATILE ORGANIC
COMPOUNDS
- Data Report -
Compound
Minimum
reporting
Result limit
Compound
Minimum
reporting
Result limit
Chlorome thane
Bromome thane
Vinyl chloride
Chloroethane
Methylene chloride
Carbon disulfide
1 , 1-Di chloroethane
trans-1 ,2-Dichloroethene
1 , 2 -Di chloroethane
2-Butanone
1 , 1 ,1-Tri chloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Vinyl acetate
Bromodi chlorome thane ;
Multiply minimum reporting
t.r\if> ml n1 mum 1 1 m-5 1. .
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
i40
ND
:50
ND
ND
12
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
limit
5
5
5
5
5
50
2
2
2
2 '
2
2
10
2
2
2
2
1 ,2-Dichloropropane
trans-1 , 3-Dichloropropene
Dibromochloromethane
1 , 1 ,2-Trichloroethane
cis-1 , 3-Dichloropropene
2-Chloroethylvinylether
Bromoform
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
2-Hexanone
Tetrachloroethene
1 ,1 ,2 ,2-Tetrachloroethane
Ethylbenzene
Styrene
Total xylenes
ND
ND
890
ND
ND
980
ND
ND
ND
170
ND
ND
ND
830
930
ND
ND
ND
by dilution factor to obtain Reported
Ohpr-Vprl
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
10
10
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
by: -Zr^^
>,,r. fJ-&
Dilution factor: 5.
ND = Not detected above the true minimum limit.
SURROGATE RECOVERIES (%):
-1, 2 -di chloroethane 109
-toluene 85
COMMENTS: Unknown hydrocarbons present.
-------
ENSECO
INCORPORATtD
CLIENT: HWMSS-42
CLIENT ID: Extract 6A (SS)
ERGO ID: _28456__
SAMPLE RECEIVED: 03/18/86
ANALYSIS COMPLETED: 04/18/86
RESULTS IN:
ug/1
SUMMARY OF ORGANIC
PRIORITY POLLUTANT ANALYSIS
VOLATILE ORGANIC
COMPOUNDS
- Data Report -
Compound
Result
Compound
Result
Chloromethane
Bromomethane
Vinyl chloride
Chloroethane
Methylene chloride
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,1-Dichloroethane
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
1,2-Di chloroethane
2-Butanone
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Vinyl acetate
Bromodi chloromethane
'<25 1,2-Dichloropropane
,<25 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
<25 Trichloroethene
<25 Dibromochloromethane
<25 1,1,2-Trichloroethane
<250 Benzene
<10 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
130 2-Chloroethylvinylether
<10 Bromoform
<10 4-Methyl-2-pentanone
<10 2-Hexanone
~
-------
ERCO/
A D/WS/O.V Of
ENSECO
/.\CORPOR.4T£D
CLIENT:
CLIENT ID:
ERCO ID:
SAMPLE RECEIVED:
ANALYSIS COMPLETED:
HWMSS-42
Extract 6B (SS)
28-457
03/18/86
04/18/86
RESULTS IN: ug/l (ppb)
SUMMARY OF ORGANIC
PRIORITY POLLUTANT ANALYSIS
VOLATILE ORGANIC
COMPOUNDS
- Data Report -
Compound
Result Compound
Result
Chloromethane
Bromome.thane
Vinyl chloride
Chloroethane
Methylene chloride
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,1-Di chloroethane
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
1,2 -Di chloroe thane ~~" ~~~
2-Butanone
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Vinyl acetate
3romodichloromethane
<25 1,2-Diehloropropane
<25 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
<25 Trichloroethene
<25 Dibromochloromethane
<25 1,1,2-Trichloroethane
<250 Benzene
cis-l,3-Dichloropropene
2-Chloroethylvinylether
<10 Bromoform
<10 4-Methyl-2-pentanone
<10 2-Hexanone
<10 - Tetrachloroethene .
<50 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
<10 Toluene
<10 Chlorobenzene
<10 Ethylbenzene
<10 Styrene
Total xylenes
200
670
<50
<50
620
170
110
1,200
Reported by:
Checked by:
TRB
SURROGATE RECOVERIES ($): d^-l^-dichloroethane 98
d8-toluene 97
-------
CLIENT : HWMSS-42
SAMPLE RECEIVED: 01/29/86
ANALYSIS COMPLETED: 02/05/86
. RESULTS IN: UE/1 (ppb)
REPORTED BY: CTFM
CHECKED BY: /VS
ERCO/A Division of ENSECO
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS
"
BY EPA METHOD 624
- Data Report -
Page 1 of 2
Minimum
reporting
Compound limit
Chloromethane . 5
Bromomethane 5
Vinyl chloride 5
Chloroethane 5
Methylene chloride 5
Acetone 50 .
Carbon disulfide 2
1,1-Dichloroethene 2
1,1-Dichloroethane 2
trans-l,2-Dichloroethene 2
Chloroform 2
1, 2 -Di chloroethane 2
2-Butanone 10
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 2
Carbon tetrachloride 2
Vinyl acetate 2
Bromodichloromethane 2
1,2-Dichloropropane 2
trans-l,3-Dichloropropene 2
Trichloroethene 2
Dibromochloromethane ' 2
1,1,2 -Tri chloroethane 2
Benzene 2
cis-l,3-Dichloropropene 2
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether 2
Bromoform 2
2-Hexanone 10
4-Methyl-2-pentanone 10
Tetrachloroethene 2
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 2
Toluene 2
Chlorobenzene 2
Ethylbenzene 2
Styrene 2
Total xylenes 2
Extract
Client ID: 7A-(SS)
ERGO ID: 26011
ND
ND
ND
ND
43
ND
ND
420
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
190
ND
ND
820
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
670
140
130
ND
1,200
Extract
7B-(SS)
26012
ND
ND
ND
ND
39
ND
ND
420
ND
ND
ND
ND
120
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
190
ND
ND
810
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
670
140
130
ND
1,300
ND = Not detected.
-------
CLIENT: HWMSS-42
Aliyl benzenes
Dilution factor:
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS
BY EPA METHOD 624
- Data Report -
Page 2 of 2
Additional Client ID:
compounds ERGO ID:
Unknown hydrocarbons
Extract
7A-(SS)
26011
X
Extract
7B-(SS)
26012
X
Multiply minimum reporting limit by dilution factor to obtain true minimum limit,
X = Present.
Surrogate
Recoveries
% Recovery d^-l^-Dichloroethane
107
102
% Recovery d8-Toluene
104
103
-------
CLIENT: HWMSS-42
ERCO/A Division of ENSECO
SAMPLE RECEIVED: 01/27/86
ANALYSIS COMPLETED: 02/05/86
RESULTS IN: ug/l (ppb)
REPORTED BY: TFtf
CHECKED BY: Ns
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS
BY EPA METHOD 624
- Data
Page
Report -
1 of 2
Minimum
reporting
Compound limit
Chloromethane 5
Bromomethane 5
Vinyl chloride 5
Chloroethane 5
Methylene chloride 5
Acetone 50
Carbon disulf ide 2
1,1-Dichloroethene 2
1,1-Di Chloroethane 2
trans -1,2-Dichloroethene 2
Chloroform 2
1,2-Di Chloroethane 2
2-Butanone 10
1 , 1 , 1 -Trl Chloroethane - 2
Carbon tetra chloride 2
Vinyl acetate 2
Bromodichloromethane 2
1,2-Dichloropropane 2
trans-l,3-Dichloropropene 2
Trichloroethene . 2
Dibromochloromethane 2
1,1, 2 -Tri Chloroethane 2
Benzene 2
cis -1 , 3-Dichloropropene 2
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether 2
Bromofonn 2
2-Hexanone 10
4-Methyl-2-pentanone 10
Tetrachloroethene 2
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 2
Toluene 2
Chlorobenzene 2
Ethylbenzene " 2
Styrene 2
Total xylenes 2
Extract
Client ID: 8A-(SS)
ERCO ID: 25895
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
460
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
240
ND
ND
890
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
960
190
160
ND
1,400
Extract
8B-(SS)
25896
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
430
ND
ND
ND
ND
100
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
210
ND
ND
840
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
730
150
150
ND
1,400
ND = Not detected.
-------
CLIENT: HWMSS-42
Alkyl benzene
Dilution factor:
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS
BY EPA METHOD 624
- Data Report -
Page 2 of 2
Additional
compounds
Untaown hydrocarbons
Extract
Client ID: 8A-(SS)
ERGO ID: 25895
X
Extract
8B-(SS)
25896
X
Multiply minimum reporting limit by dilution factor to obtain true minimum limit,
X = Present.
Surrogate
Recoveries
% Recovery d^l^-Dichloroethane
100
96
% Recovery d8-Toluene
UO
99
-------
CLIENT: HWMSS-42
ERCO/A Division of ENSECO
SAMPLE RECEIVED: 02/03/86
ANALYSIS COMPLETED: 02/12/86
. RESULTS IN: ug/l
REPORTED BY: Tf*
CHECKED BY: N5
Compound
Chloromethane
Bromomethane
Vinyl chloride
Chloroethane
Methylene chloride
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
1 , 1-Dichloroethene
1 , 1-Di chloroethane
trans-1 ,2-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
1,2-Di chloroethane
2-Butanone
1,1, 1-Tri chloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Vinyl acetate
Bromodi chloromethane
1 , 2-Dichloropropane
trans-1 , 3-Dichloropropene
Trichloroethene ;-
Dibromochloromethane
1,1, 2 -Tri chloroethane
Benzene
cis-1 , 3-Dichloropropene
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
Bromoform
2-Hexanone
4-Methy 1-2 -pentanone
Tetrachloroethene
1 , 1 ,2 ,2-Tetrachloroethane
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
Styrene
Total xylenes
(ppb)
I
Minimum
reporting
limit
5
5
5
5
5
50
2
2
2
2
2
2
10
2 '
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
10
10
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
VOLATILE ORGANICS
BY
'
Client ID: Blank A
ERGO ID: 26245
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
44
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
EPA METHOD
Data Report
Page 1 of 2
Blank B
26246
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
"ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ANALYSIS
624
_
Blank C
26247
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
11
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND = Not detected.
-------
CLIENT: HWMSS-42
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS
BY EPA METHOD 624
- Data Report -
Page 2 of 2
Additional
compounds
Client ID:
ERGO ID:
Unknown hydrocarbons
Blank A
262-45
X
Blank B
26246
X
Blank C
26247
X
Dilution factor:
Multiply minimum reporting limit by dilution factor to obtain true minimum limit,
X = Present.
Surrogate
Recoveries
% Recovery d^-l^-Dichloroethane
109
97
108
% Recovery de-Toluene
99
97
94
-------
ERCO/
A DlV/Sii
Jf
ENSECO
I\COKPORA7ED
CLIENT:
CLIENT ID:
ERCO ID:
SAMPLE RECEIVED:
ANALYSIS COMPLETED:
HWMSS-42
Blank D
28958
04/01/86
04/14/86
RESULTS IN: ug/1 (ppb)
SUMMARY OF ORGANIC
PRIORITY POLLUTANT ANALYSIS
VOLATILE ORGANIC
COMPOUNDS
- Data Report -
Compound
Result
Compound
Result
Chloromethane
Bromomethane
Vinyl chloride
Chloroethane
Methylene chloride
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,1-Dichloroethane
trans-1,2-Di chloroethene
Chloroform
1,2-Di chloroethane
2-Butanone
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Vinyl acetate
BromodiChloromethane
<25 1,2-Dichloropropane
<25 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
<25 Trichloroethene
<25 Dibromochloromethane
<25 1,1,2-Trichloroethane
<250 Benzene
<10 cis-l,3-Dichloropropene
<10 2-Chloroethylvinylether
<10 Bromoform
<10 4-Methyl-2-pentanone
<10 " 2-Hexanone
<10 .Tetrachloroethene
<50 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
<10 Toluene
<10 " Chlorobenzene
<10 Ethylbenzene
<10 Styrene
Total xylenes
<50
<50
Reported by:
Checked by:
SURROGATE RECOVERIES (%):
d^-l^-dichloroethane 97
d8-toluene 96
-------
ERCO/
DIVISION or
ENSECO
I.VCORPORATfD
CLIENT:
CLIENT ID:
ERCO ID:
SAMPLE RECEIVED:
ANALYSIS COMPLETED:
HWMSS-42
Blank E
29009
04/02/86
05/07/86
RESULTS IN: ug/l (ppb)
SUMMARY OF ORGANIC
PRIORITY POLLUTANT ANALYSIS
VOLATILE ORGANIC
COMPOUNDS
- Data Report -
Compound
Result
Compound
Result
Chloromethane
Bromomethane
Vinyl chloride
Chlorcothane
Methylene chloride
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,1-Dichloroethane
trans-l,2-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
1,2-Dichloroethane
2-Butanone
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Vinyl acetate
Bromodichloromethane
<25 1,2-Dichloropropane
<25 trans-l,3-Dichloropropene
<25 Trichloroethene
<25 Dibromochloromethane
<25 1,1,2-Trichloroethane
<250 Benzene
<10 cis-l,3-Dichloropropene
<10 2-Chloroethylvinylether
<10 Bromofonn
<10 4-Methyl-2-pentanone
<10 2-Hexanone
<10 Tetrachloroethene
<50 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
<10 Toluene
<10 Chlorobenzene
<10 Ethylbenzene
<10 Styrene
Total xylenes
<50
<50
Reported by:
Checked by:
SURROGATE RECOVERIES ($): d^-l^-dichloroethane 97
£ -toluene 99
COMMENTS: Unknown present.
-------
ENSECO
/N'CORPORATfD
CLIENT:
CLIENT ID:
ERGO ID:
SAMPLE RECEIVED:
ANALYSIS COMPLETED:
HWMSS-42
Blank F
28959
04/01/86
04/18/86
RESULTS IN: ug/l (ppb)
SUMMARY OF ORGANIC
PRIORITY POLLUTANT ANALYSIS
VOLATILE ORGANIC
COMPOUNDS
- Data Report -
Compound
Result
Compound
Result
Chloromethane
Bromomethane
Vinyl chloride
Chloroethane
Methylene chloride
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,1-DiChloroethane
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
1,2-DiChloroethane
2-Butanone
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Vinyl acetate
Bromodichloromethane
<25 1,2-Dichloropropane
<25 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
<25 . Trichloroethene
<25 Dibromochloromethane
<25 1,1,2-Trichloroethane
<250 Benzene
<10 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
<10 2-Chloroethylvinylether
<10 Bromoform
<10 4-Methyl-2-pentanone
<10 2-Hexanone
<10 Tetrachloroethene
<50 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
<10 Toluene
<10 Chlorobenzene
<10 Ethylbenzene
<10 Styrene
Total xylenes
<50
<50
Reported by:
Checked by:
SURROGATE RECOVERIES (%)
l, 2 -di Chloroethane 73
toluene 86
-------
CLIENT: HWMSS-42
ERCO/A Division of ENSECO
SAMPLE RECEIVED: 01/21/86
ANALYSIS COMPLETED: 01/30/86
RESULTS IN: jig/1 (ppb)
REPORTED BY: jFtt
CHECKED BY: MS
VOLATILE ORGANICS
BY EPA METHOD
- Data Report
Page 1 of 2
ANALYSIS
624
_
i Initial Filtrates ,
Minimum
reporting
Compound limit
Chloromethane 5
Bromomethane 5
Vinyl chloride 5
Chloroethane 5
Methyl ene chloride 5
Acetone 50
Carbon disulfide 2
1,1-Dichloroethene 2
1,1-Di chloroethane 2
trans-l,2-Dichloroethene 2
Chloroform 2
1,2-Dichloroethane 2
2-rButanone 10
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 2
Carbon tetra chloride 2
Vinyl acetate 2
Bromodichloromethane 2
1,2-Dichloropropane 2
trans -1,3-Dichloropropene 2
Trichloroethene ^ 2
Dibromochloromethane 2
1,1,2-Tri chloroethane 2
Benzene 2 .
cis -1,3-Dichloropropene 2
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether 2
Bromoform 2
2-Hexanone 10
4-Methyl-2-pentanone 10
Tetrachloroethene 2
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 2
Toluene 2
Chlorobenzene 2
Ethylbenzene 2
Styrene 2
Total xylenes 2
Client ID: Extract 1A-(AL) Extract
IB-(AL)
ERGO ID: 25685 25686
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
690 1,
ND
13
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
35
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
11
ND
30
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
300
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
150
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
44
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
24
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND = Not detected.
-------
VOLATILE ORGANIC5 ANALYSIS
BY EPA METHOD 624
- Data Report -
CLIENT: HWMSS-42 Page 2 of 2
i. Initial Filtrates
Additional Client ID: Extract IA-(AL) Extract IB-(AL)
compounds ERCO ID: 25685 25686
Unknown (see attached sheets) X X
Dilution factor: 5 5
Multiply minimum reporting limit by dilution factor to obtain true minimum limit,
X = Present.
Surrogate
Recoveries
% Recovery d^-l,2-Dichloroethane 92 90
% Recovery d8-Toluene 93 111
-------
CLIENT: HWMSS-42 e ERCO/A Division of ENSECO
CLIENT ID: Extract 1A (AL) Initial Filtrate ORGANICS ANALYSIS
ERCO ID: 25685 TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
REPORTED BY: TFM . . BY EPA METHOD 624
CHECKED BY: U$ - Data Report -
Estimated
concentration
Compound name Fraction Scan no.
Unknown Hydrocarbon
Pyridine
Untoown aromatic
VOA
VOA
VOA
130
688
l,Cil
30
65
30
-------
CLIENT: HWMSS-42
ERCO/A Division of ENSECO
CLIENT ID: Extract IB (AL)
ERCO ID: .25686
REPORTED BY: OTM
CHECKED BY: NS
Initial Filtrate ORGANICS ANALYSIS
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
BY EPA METHOD 624
- Data Report -
Compound name
Unknown hydrocarbon
Pyridine
Unknown aromatic
Unknown aromatic
Unknown hydrocarbon
Estimated
concentration
Fraction Scan no. (yg/D
VOA 129 56
VOA 684 160
VOA 1,011 i40
VOA 897 83
VOA 1,356 26
-------
CLIENT : HWMSS-42
SAMPLE RECEIVED: 01/20/86
ANALYSIS COMPLETED: 01/28/86
RESULTS IN: ug/l (PP*
REPORTED BY: f>T7\/3Trt
CHECKED BY: N$
ERCO/A
Division of ENSECO
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS
))
BY
-
EPA METHOD 624
Data Report -
Page 1 of 2
|-_ Initial Filtrates
Minimum
reporting
Compound limit
Chloromethane
Bromomethane
Vinyl chloride
Chloroethane
Methylene chloride
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
1 , 1-Dichloroethene
1 , 1-Di chloroethane
trans -1 , 2-Di chloroe thene
Chloroform
1,2-Dichloroethane
2-Butanone .
1,1,1 -Tri chloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Vinyl acetate
Bromodi chloromethane
1 ,2-Dichloropropane
trans-1 , 3-Dichloropropene
Tri chloroe thene
Dibromochloromethane
1,1, 2-Tri chloroethane
Benzene
cis -1 , 3-Dichloropropene
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
Bromoform
2-Hexanone
4-Met by 1 -2 -pen t anone
Tetrachloroethene
1 , 1 ,2 ,2-Tetra chloroethane
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
Styrene
Total xylenes
5
5
5
5
5
50
2
2
2
2
2
2
10
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
10
10
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Client ID: Extract 2A-(AL) Extract 2B-(AL)
ERGO ID: 25645
ND
ND
ND
ND
130
910
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
140
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
24
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
20
ND
ND
ND
ND
25646
ND
ND
ND
ND
110
1,100
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
150
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
23
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
13
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND = Not detected.
-------
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS
BY EPA METHOD 624
- Data Report -
CLIENT: HWMSS-42 . Page 2 of 2
Initial Filtrates
Additional Client ID: Extract 2A-UL) Extract 2B-(AL)
compounds ERGO ID: 25645 25646
Unknowns* (See attached sheet)
Dilution factor: 5 5
Multiply minimum reporting limit by dilution factor to obtain true minimum limit.
Calculated with an R.F. of 1.0. Identification based on reference spectra.
X = Present. ...
Surrogate
Recoveries
% Recovery 0^-1,2-Dichloroethane 111 105
% Recovery dg-Toluene 102 99
-------
CLIENT: HWMSS-42
CLIENT irf: 25645
ERGO ID: Extract 2A (AL)
REPORTED BY:
CHECKED BY:
ERCO/A Division of ENSECO
ORGANICS ANALYSIS
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
BY EPA METHOD 624
- Data Report -
Compound name
Fraction Scan no.
Estimated
concentration
(ug/D
Pyridine
Phenol
Unknown hydrocarbon
VOA
VOA
VOA
690
1,015
1,332
72
43
25
-------
CLIENT: HWMSS-42
ERCO/A Division of ENSECO
e
CLIENT ID: 25646
ERCO ID: Extract 2B (AL)
REPORTED BY: PlA/jT/n
CHECKED BY: N5
ORGANICS ANALYSIS
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
BY EPA METHOD 624
- Data Report -
Compound name
Pyridine
Phenol
Phenol, 2-methyl-
Unknown hydrocarbon
Benzofuran
Estimated
concentration
Fraction Scan no. (ug/1)
VOA 690 120
VOA 1,014 92
VOA 1,282 25
VOA 1,328 25
VOA 1,396 25
-------
CLIENT: HWMSS-42
ERCO/A Division of ENSECO
SAMPLE RECEIVED: 03/10/86
ANALYSIS COMPLETED: 04/04/86
. RESULTS IN: ug/1
REPORTED BY: XTF*
CHECKED BY:
Compound
Chloromethane
Bromomethane
Vinyl chloro.de
Chloroethane
Methylene chloride .
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
1 , 1-Di chloroethene
1 , 1-Di chloroethane
t rans -1,2 -Di chloroethene
Chloroform
1 , 2-Di chloroethane
2-Butanone
1 , 1 , 1-Tri chloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Vinyl acetate
Bromodichloromethane
1 , 2-Dichloropropane
trans-1 , 3-Dichloropropene
Tri chloroethene :
Dibromochloromethane
1 , 1 , 2-Tri chloroethane
Benzene
cis-1 , 3-Dichloropropene
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
Bromoform
2-Hexanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Tetra chloroethene
1,1,2, 2 -Tetra chloroethane
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
Styrene
Total xylenes
(ppb)
Minimum
reporting
limit
5
5
5
5
5
50
2
2
2
2
2
2
10
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
10
10
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS
BY
-
Initial
Extract
Client ID: 3A (AL)
ERGO ID: 27959
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1,400
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
140
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
45
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
14
ND.
24
ND
ND
ND
ND
EPA METHOD 624
Data Report -
Page 1 of 2
Filtrates
Extract
3B (AL)
27960
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1,100
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
79
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
29
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
16
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND = Not detected.
-------
CLIENT: HWMSS-42
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS
BY EPA METHOD 624
- Data Report -
Page 2 of 2
-Initial Filtrates
Additional
compounds
Pyridine
Extract
Client ID: 3A (AL)
ERGO ID: 27959
X
Extract
3B (AL)
27960
X
Aliyl-substituted pyridine
Unknown aliphatic hydrocarbons
Dilution factor:
Multiply minimum reporting limit by dilution factor to obtain true minimum limit,
X = Present. _.
Surrogate
Recoveries
% Recovery d^-l^-Dichloroethane
97
140
% Recovery ds -Toluene
98
95
-------
ERCO/
A DIVISIC
ENSECO
CLIENT:
CLIENT ID:
ERCO ID:
SAMPLE RECEIVED:
ANALYSIS COMPLETED:
HWMSS-42
Extract 4A (AL) Initial Filtrate
27258
03/03/86
04/02/86 ____
RESULTS IN: ug/l (ppb)
SUMMARY OF ORGANIC
PRIORITY POLLUTANT ANALYSIS
VOLATILE ORGANIC
COMPOUNDS
- Data Report -
Compound
Result
Compound
Result
Chloromethane
Bromomethane
Vinyl chloride
Chloroethane
Methylene chloride
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,1-Dichloroethane
trans-1,2-Di chloroethene
Chloroform
1,2-Dichloroethane
2-Butanone
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Vinyl acetate
Bromodichloromethane
<25 1,2-Dichloropropane
<25 trans-l,3-Dichloropropene
<25 Trichloroethene
<25 - Dibromochloromethane
- 35 1,1,2-Trichloroethane
860 Benzene
<10 cis-l,3-Dichloropropene
<10 2-Chloroethylvinylether
<10 Bromoform
<10 4-Methyl-2-pentanone
<10 2-Hexanone
<10 Tetrachloroethene
130 . 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
<10 Toluene
<10 Chlorobenzene
<10 Ethylbenzene
<10 Styrene
Total xylenes
<50
<50
<2*
*Trace concentrations detected below the reporting limit.
Reported by:
Checked by:
SURROGATE RECOVERIES (%):
d^ -1, 2 -di chloroethane 95
d8 -toluene 100
-------
INCORPORATED
CLIENT:
CLIENT ID:
ERGO ID:
SAMPLE RECEIVED:
ANALYSIS COMPLETED:
HWMSS-42
Extract 4B (AL) Initial Filtrate
27259
03/03/86 t
0^/03/86
RESULTS IN: ug/l (ppb)
SUMMARY OF ORGANIC
PRIORITY POLLUTANT ANALYSIS
VOLATILE ORGANIC
COMPOUNDS
- Data Report -
Compound
Result
Compound
Result
Chloromethane
Bromomethane
Vinyl chloride
Chloroethane
Methylene chloride
Acetone ,-.____ .
Carbon disulfide
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,1-Dichloroethane
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
1,2-Dichloroethane
2-Butanone
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Carbon tetraehloride
Vinyl acetate
Bromodichloromethane
<25 1,2-Dichloropropane
<25 trans-l,3-Dichloropropene
<25 Trichloroethene
<25 DibromocMoromethane
32 1,1,2-Trlchloroethane
480 Benzene <
<10 ci s-1,3-Dichloropropene
<10 2-Chloroethylvinylether
<10 Bromoform
<10 4-44ethyl-2-pentanone
<10 2-Hexanone
<10 Tetrachloroethene
<50 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
<10 Toluene
<10 Chlorobenzene
<10 Ethylbenzene
<10 Styrene
Total xylenes
31
<50
<50
17
Reported by:
Checked by:
SURROGATE RECOVERIES (%): . d^-l,2-dichloroethane 88
d8-toluene 114
-------
CLIENT: HWMSS-42
ERCO/A
Divi
si on of ENSECO
SAMPLE RECEIVED: 03/10/86
ANALYSIS COMPLETED: 04/04/86
RESULTS IN: ug/l (ppb)
REPORTED BY: J"PM
CHECKED BY:
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS
BY EPA. METHOD 624
- Data Report -
Page 1 of 2
Initial Filtrates
Minimum
reporting
Compound limit
Chloromethane 5
Bromomethane 5
Vinyl chloride 5.
Chloroethane 5
Methylene chloride 5
Acetone 50
Carbon disulfide 2
1,1-Dichloroethene 2
1,1-Dichloroethane 2
trans-l,2-Dichloroethene 2
Chloroform 2
1.,2-Di chloroethane 2
2-Butahone 10
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 2
Carbon tetrachloride 2
Vinyl acetate 2
Bromodichloromethane 2
1 , 2-Di chloropropane 2
trans-l,3-Dichloropropene 2
Trichloroethene 2
Dibromochloromethane 2
1,1,2-Tri chloroethane 2
Benzene 2
cis-l,3-Dichloropropene 2
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether 2
Bromoform 2
2-Hexanone 10
4-Methyl-2-pentanone 10
Tetrachloroethene 2
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 2
Toluene 2
Chlorobenzene 2
Ethylbenzene 2
Styrene 2
Total xylenes 2
Extract
Client ID: 5A (AL)
ERCO ID: 27961
ND
ND l
ND
ND
ND
1,500
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
180
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
41.
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
12
ND
20
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND = Not detected.
-------
CLIENT: HWMSS-42
*VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS
BY EPA METHOD 624
- Data Report -
Page 2 of 2
initial Filtrates
Additional
compounds
Client ID:
ERGO ID:
Extract
5A (AL)
27961
Pyridine
Alkyl-substituted pyridine
Unknown aliphatic hydrocarbons
Dilution factor:
Multiply minimum reporting limit by dilution factor to obtain true minimum limit.
X = Present.
Surrogate
Recoveries
% Recovery d^-l^-Dichloroethane
95
% Recovery da-Toluene
97
-------
CLIENT: HWMSS-42
ERCO/A Division of ENSECO
SAMPLE RECEIVED: 03/11/86
ANALYSIS COMPLETED: 04/05/86
RESULTS IN: UE/1 (ppb)
REPORTED BY: 3TW
CHECKED BY: **
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS
BY EPA METHOD 624
- Data Report -
Page 2 of 2
Initial Filtrates
*
Minimum
reporting
Compound limit
Chloromethane 5
Bromomethane 5
Vinyl chloride . 5
Chloroethane 5
Methylene chloride 5
Acetone 50
Carbon disulfide 2
1,1-Dichloroethene 2
1,1-Di chloroethane 2
trans-l,2-Dichloroethene 2
Chloroform 2
1,2-Di chloroethane 2
2-Butanone 10
1,1,1-Tri chloroethane 2
Carbon tetrachloride 2
Vinyl acetate 2
Bromodi chloromethane 2
1,2-Di chloropropane 2
trans-l,3-Dichloropropene 2
Trichloroethene 2
Dlbromochloromethane 2
1,1,2-Tri chloroethane 2
Benzene 2
cis-1 , 3-Dichloropropene 2
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether 2
Bromoform 2
2-Hexanone 10
4-Methyl-2-pentanone 10
Tetrachloroethene 2
1,1, 2, 2-Tetra chloroethane 2
Toluene 2
Chlorobenzene 2
Ethylbenzene 2
Styrene 2
Total xylenes 2
Extract
Client ID: 5B (AL)
ERGO ID: 27999
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1,400
ND
ND
ND
ND
10
' . ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
20
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND = Not detected.
-------
CLIENT: HWMSS-42
Dilution factor:
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS
BY EPA METHOD 624
- Data Report -
Page 2 of 2
Initial Filtrates
Additional
compounds
Unknowns
Client ID:
ERGO ID:
Extract
5B (AL)
27999
X
Multiply minimum reporting limit by dilution"factor to obtain'true minimum limit.
X = Present.
Surrogate
Recoveries
% Recovery d^l^-Dichloroethane
112
% Recovery d8-Toluene
80
-------
/.VCORPORATfD
CLIENT:
CLIENT ID:
ERCO ID:
SAMPLE RECEIVED:
ANALYSIS COMPLETED:
RESULTS IN:
HWMSS-42
Extracte6A (AL) - Initial Filtrate
27348 .
03/05/86
04/U/86 .
ug/1 (ppb)
SUMMARY OF ORGANIC
PRIORITY POLLUTANT ANALYSIS
VOLATILE ORGANIC
COMPOUNDS
- Data Report -
Compound
Result
Compound
Result
Chloromethane
Bromomethane
Vinyl chloride
Chloroethane
Methylene chloride
Carbon disulfide
1 ,1-Dichloroethene
1 ,1-Di chloroethane
trans-l ,2-Dichloroethene
1 ,2-Dichloroethane
2-Butanone
1,1, 1-Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Vinyl acetate
Bromodichloromethane
<25
<25
<25
4<25
<25
? ?nn
<25
<25
<25
<25
__ 1 "3
<25
<50
<10
<10
<10
<10
1 ,2-Dichloropropane
trans-l , 3-Dichloropropene
Trichloroethene
Dibromochloromethane
1 ,1 ,2-Trichloroethane
cis-1 ,3-Dichloropropene
2-Chloroethylvinylether
Bromoform
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
2-Hexanone
Tetrachloroethene
1,1,2 ,2-Tetrachloroethane
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
Styrene
Total xylenes
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
f./
<10
<10
<10
<50
<50
<10
<10
______ O-7
_J_J
<10
<10
<10
<10
Reported by:
Checked by:
COMMENTS: Unknowns present.
SURROGATE RECOVERIES (%)
d^-l^-dichloroethane 150
de-toluene 96
-------
ERGO/,
,*
ENSECO
INCORPORATE
CLIENT:
CLIENT ID:
ERCO ID:
SAMPLE RECEIVED:
ANALYSIS COMPLETED:
RESULTS IN:
HWMSS-42
Extract 6B (AL) - Initial Filtrate
27349
03/05/86
04/02/86 .
ug/1 (ppb)
SUMMARY OF ORGANIC
PRIORITY POLLUTANT ANALYSIS
VOLATILE ORGANIC
COMPOUNDS
- Data Report -
Compound
Result
Compound
Result
Chloromethane
Bromomethane
Vinyl chloride
Chloi'oethane l
Methylene chloride
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,1-Dichloroethane
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
1,2-Dichloroethane
2-Butanone
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Vinyl acetate
Bromodichloromethane
<25
<25
<25
<25
<25
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<50
<10
<10
<10
<10
1 ,2-Dichloropropane
trans-l,3-Dichloropropene
Trichloroethene
Dibromochlorome thane
1 , 1 ,2-Trichloroethane
cis-l , 3-Dichloropropene
2-Chloroethylvinylether
Bromoform
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
2-Hexanone
Tetrachloroethene
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Toluene ------------------
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
Styrene
Total xylenes
55
<50
<50
30
Reported by:
Checked by:
SURROGATE RECOVERIES (%): d^-l^-dichloroethane 85
d8-toluene
114
-------
CLIENT : HWMSS-42
SAMPLE RECEIVED: 01/22/86
ANALYSIS COMPLETED: 02/04/86
. RESULTS IN: ug/l (ppb)
REPORTED BY: J"FM
CHECKED BY: H*
«
Minimum
reporting Client ID:
Compound limit ERGO ID:
Chloromethane 5
Bromomethane 5
Vinyl chloride 5
Chloroethane 5
Methylene chloride 5
Acetone 50
Carbon disulfide 2
1 , 1-Dichloroethene 2
1,1-Di chloroethane 2
trans-l,2-Dichloroethene 2
Chloroform 2
1 , 2-Dichloroethane 2
2-Butanone 10
1 , 1 , 1 -Tri chloroethane 2
Carbon tetrachloride 2
Vinyl acetate 2
Bromodiehloromethane 2
1,2-Dichloropropane 2
trans-l,3-Dichloropropene 2
Trichloroethene 2
Dibromochloromethane 2
1,1,2-Tri chloroethane 2
Benzene 2
cis-l,3-Dichloropropene 2
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether 2
Bromofonn 2
2-Hexanone 10
4-Methyl-2-pentanone 10
Tetrachloroethene 2
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 2
Toluene 2
Chlorobenzene 2
Ethylbenzene 2
Styrene 2
Total xylenes 2
ERCO/A
Division of ENSECO
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS
BY
_
P Initial
Extract
7A-(AL)
25751
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
840
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
130
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
31
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
16
ND
ND
ND
ND
EPA METHOD 624
Data Report -
Page 1 of 2
Filtrates ,
Extract
7A-(AL)
25752
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
920
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
150
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
40
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
22
ND .
ND
ND
ND
ND = Not detected.
-------
CLIENT: HWMSS-42
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS
BY EPA METHOD 624
- Data Report -
Page 2 of 2
Pyridinea
Initial Filtrates
54
i
*
Additional
compounds
Alkyl benzenea
Client ID:
ERGO ID:
Extract
7A-(AL)
25751
27
Extract
7B-(AL)
25752
40
75
Unknown hydrocarbona
ND
28
Dilution factor:
Multiply minimum reporting limit by dilution factor to obtain true minimum limit,
Calculated with R.F, of 1.0. Indentification based on reference spectrum.
Surrogate
Recoveries
% Recovery 0^-1,2-Dichloroethane
98
98
% Recovery dg-Toluene
100
102
-------
CLIENT: HWMSS-42
ERCO/A Division of ENSECO
SAMPLE RECEIVED: 01/23/86
ANALYSIS COMPLETED: 02/04/86
RESULTS IN: ug/l
REPORTED BY: fT
CHECKED BY: A/*
(ppb)
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS
BY EPA METHOD 624
- Data Report -
Page 1 of 2
P Initial Filtrates -.
Compound
Chloromethane
Bromome thane
Vinyl chloride
Chloroethane
Methylene chloride
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
1 ,1-Dichloroethene
1 , 1-Di chloroethane
trans- 1 , 2 -Di chloroethene
Chloroform
1 ,2-Dichloroethane
2-Butanone
1 , 1 ,1-Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Vinyl acetate
Bromodi chloromethane
1 , 2 -Di chloropropane
trans-1 , 3-Dichloropropene
Trichloroethene ' <
Dibromochloromethane
1,1, 2-Trichloroe thane
Benzene
cis-1 , 3-Dichloropropene
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
Bromoform
2-Hexanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Tetrachloroethene
1,1,2,2 -Tetra chloroethane
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
Styrene
Total xylenes
Minimum
reporting Client ID:
limit ERGO ID:
5
5
5
5
5
50
2
2
2
2
2
2
10.
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
10
10
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Extract Extract
8A-(AL) 8B-(AL)
25786 25787
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
580 860
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND 85
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
23 35
ND ND
ND ND
ND ' ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND 18
ND ND
14 19
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND = Not detected.
-------
CLIENT: HWMSS-42
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS
BY EPA METHOD 624
- Data Report -
Page 2 of 2
Additional
compounds
Client ID:
ERGO ID:
Extract
8A-(AL)
25786
Extract
8B-(AL)
25787
None detected
Dilution factor:
Multiply minimum reporting limit by dilution factor to obtain true minimum limit,
Surrogate
Recoveries
% Recovery d^-l^-Dichloroethane
102
108
% Recovery dg-Toluene
100
97
-------
CLIENT: HWMSS-42
ERCO/A Division of ENSECO
SAMPLE RECEIVED: 01/22/86
ANALYSIS COMPLETED: 02/04/86
RESULTS IN: UE/1 (ppb)
REPORTED BY: TPM
CHECKED BY: NS
Minimum
reporting
Compound limit
Chloromethane 5
Bromomethane 5
Vinyl chloride 5
Chloroethane 5
Methylene chloride . 5
Acetone 50
Carbon disulfide 2
1 , 1-Dichloroethene 2
1 , 1-Di Chloroethane 2
trans-l,2-Dichloroethene 2
Chloroform 2
1,2-Dichloroethane 2
2-Butanone 10
1,1,1-Trichloroe thane 2
Carbon tetrachloride 2
Vinyl acetate 2
Bromodi chloromethane 2
1 , 2 -Di chloropropane 2
trans-l,3-Dichloropropene 2
Trichloroethene : 2
Dibromochloromethane 2
1,1, 2 -Tri Chloroethane 2
Benzene 2
cis-l,3-Dichloropropene 2
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether 2
Bromofonn 2
2-Hexanone 10
4-Methyl-2-pentanone 10
Tetrachloroethene 2
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 2
Toluene 2
Chlorobenzene 2
Ethylbenzene 2
Styrene 2
Total xylenes 2.
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS
BY EPA METHOD 624
- Data Report -
Page 1 of 2
i Initial Filtrate -,
r n
Extract
Client ID: 1A-(SS)
ERGO ID: 25750
ND
ND
KD
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
" ~-ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
140
ND
ND
ND
ND .
ND
ND
ND
72
ND
28
ND
170
ND = Not detected.
-------
CLIENT: HWMSS-42
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS
BY EPA METHOD 624
- Data Report -
Page 2 of 2
Pyridinea
Initial Filtrates
"I
Additional
compounds
Alkyl benzenea
Client ID:
ERGO ID:
Extract
1A-(SS)
25750
18
ND
Unknown hydrocarbon3
ND
Dilution factor:
Multiply minimum reporting limit by dilution factor to obtain true minimum limit.
^Calculated with R.F. of 1.0. Identification "based on reference spectrum.
Surrogate
Recoveries
% Recovery d^-l^-Dichloroethane
80
% Recovery dg-Toluene
100
-------
CLIENT : HWMSS-42
ERCO/A Division of ENSECO
SAMPLE RECEIVED: 01/29/86
ANALYSIS COMPLETED: 02/05/86
RESULTS IN: ug/l (ppb)
REPORTED BY: TF*
CHECKED BY: N<>
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS
BY EPA METHOD 624
' - Data Report -
Page 1 of 2
p Initial Filtrate ,
Minimum
reporting
Compound limit
Chloromethane 5
Bromomethane 5
Vinyl chloride 5
Chloroethane 5
Methylene chloride 5
Acetone 50
Carbon disulf ide 2
1 , 1-Dichloroethene 2
1 , 1-Dichloroethane 2
trans-l,2-Dichloroethene 2
Chloroform 2
1,2-Dichloroethane 2
2-Butanone 10
1,1,1 -Tri chloroethane 2
Carbon tetrachloride. 2
Vinyl acetate 2
Bromodichloromethane 2
1 , 2-Dichloropropane 2
trans-l,3-Dichloropropene 2
Trichloroethene : 2
Dibromoehloromethane 2
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 2
Benzene 2
cis-l,3-Dichloropropene 2
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether 2
Bromoform 2
2-Hexanone 10
4-Methyl-2-pentanone 10
Tetrachloroethene 2
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 2
Toluene 2
Chlorobenzene 2
Ethylbenzene 2
Styrene 2
Total xylenes 2
Extract
Client ID: IB-(SS)
ERGO ID: 26007
ND
ND
ND
. ND
36
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
50'
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
100
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
44
ND
ND
ND
93
ND = Not detected.
-------
CLIENT: HWMSS-42
Initial Filtrate
-,
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS
BY EPA METHOD 624
- Data Report -
Page 2 of 2
Additional
compounds
Client ID:
ERCO ID:
Extract
IB-(SS)
26007
None detected
Dilution factor:
Multiply minimum reporting limit by dilution factor to obtain true minimum limit.
Surrogate
Recoveries
% Recovery d^-l^-Dichloroethane
91
% Recovery dg-Toluene
104
-------
CLIENT: HWMSS-42
ERCO/A Division of ENSECO
SAMPLE RECEIVED: 01/23/86
ANALYSIS COMPLETED: 02/04/86
.RESULTS IN: uE/1 (ppb)
REPORTED BY: Pt
CHECKED BY: N$
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS
BY EPA METHOD 624
- Data Report -
Page 1 of 2
P Initial Filtrate _,
Minimum
reporting
Compound limit
Chloromethane 5
Bromomethane 5
Vinyl chloride 5
Chloroethane 5
Methylene chloride 5
Acetone 50
Carbon disulfide 2
1 , 1 -Di chloroe thene 2
1,1-Dichloroethane 2
trans-l,2-Dichloroethene 2
Chloroform 2
1, 2 -Di chloroe thane 2
2-Butanone "~^-10
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane 2
Carbon tetrachloride 2
Vinyl acetate 2
Bromodichloromethane 2
1,2-Dichloropropane 2
trans-1 , 3-Dichloropropene 2
Trichloroethene 2
Dibromochloromethane 2
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 2
Benzene 2
cis-1, 3-Dichloropropene 2
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether 2
Bromoform 2
2-Hexanone 10 .
4-Methyl-2-pentanone 10
Tetrachloroethene 2
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 2
Toluene 2
Chlorobenzene 2
Ethylbenzene 2
Styrene 2
Total xylenes 2
Extract
Client ID: 2A-(SS)
ERGO ID: 25785
ND
ND.
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
_ " ND" . .
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
120
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
87
ND
14
ND
120
ND = Not detected.
-------
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS
BY EPA METHOD 624
- Data Report -
CLIENT: HWMSS-42 Page 2 of 2
Extract
Additional Client ID: 2A-(SS)
compounds ERCO ID: 25785
None detected
Dilution factor:
Multiply minimum reporting.limit by dilution factor to obtain true minimum limit,
Surrogate
Recoveries
% Recovery d^-l^-Dichloroethane 106
% Recovery dg -Toluene .: 104
-------
CLIENT : HWMSS-42
ERCO/A Division of ENSECO
SAMPLE RECEIVED: 01/27/86
ANALYSIS COMPLETED: 02/04/86
RESULTS IN: uE/1 (ppb)
REPORTED BY: Jf=tt
CHECKED BY: N5
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS
BY EPA METHOD 624
- Data Report -
Page 1 of 2
r Initial Filtrate ,
1 1
Minimum
reporting
Compound limit
Chloromethane 5
Bromomethane 5
Vinyl chloride 5
Chloroethane 5
Methyl ene chloride 5
Acetone 50
Carbon disulfide 2
1,1-Dichloroethene 2
1,1-Di chloroethane 2
trans-l,2-Dichloroethene 2
Chloroform 2
1, 2 -Di chloroethane -2
2-Butanone 10
1,1, 1-Trichloroe thane 2
Carbon tetrachloride 2
Vinyl acetate 2
Bromodichloromethane 2
1,2-Dichloropropane 2
trans-l,3-Dichloropropene 2
Trichloroethene ' 2
Dibromochloromethane 2
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 2
Benzene 2
cis-l,3-Dichloropropene 2
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether 2
Bromoform 2
2-Hexanone 10
4-Methyl-2-pentanone 10
Tetrachloroethene 2
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 2
Toluene 2
Chlorobenzene 2
Ethylbenzene 2
Styrene 2
Total xylenes . 2
Extract
Client ID: 2B-(SS)
ERCO ID: 25891
ND
ND
ND
ND
170
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
140
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
100
ND
18
ND
150
ND = Not detected.
-------
CLIENT: HWMSS-42
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS
BY EPA METHOD 624
- Data Report -
je 2 of 2
Additional
compounds
Client ID:
ERCO ID:
Extract
2B-(SS)
25891
None detected
Dilution factor:
Multiply minimum reporting limit by dilution factor to obtain true minimum limit.
X = Present.
Surrogate
Recoveries
% Recovery 0^-1,2-Dichlorbethane
93
% Recovery dg-Toluene
101
-------
ENSECO
(XCORPORATfD
CLIENT:
CLIENT ID:
ERCO ID:
SAMPLE RECEIVED:
ANALYSIS COMPLETED:
RESULTS IN:
HWMSS-42
Extract 3A (SS) - Initial Filtrate
28615
03/20/86
0 VI3/86
ug/l (ppb)
SUMMARY OF ORGANIC
PRIORITY POLLUTANT ANALYSIS
VOLATILE ORGANIC
COMPOUNDS
- Data Report -
Compound
Result
Compound
Result
Chloromethane
Bromomethane
Vinyl chloride
Chloroethane
Methylene chloride
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,1-Dichloroethane
trans-1,2-Di chloroethene
Chloroform
1,2-Dichloroethane -"'
2-Butanone
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Vinyl acetate
Bromodi chloromethane
<25 1,2-Dichloropropane
<25 trans-l,3-Dichloropropene
<25 Trichloroethene
<25 Dibromochloromethane
<25 1,1,2-Trichloroethane
<250 Benzene
<10 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
<10 2-Chloroethylvinylether
<10 Bromoform
<10 4-Methyl-2-pentanone
11 2-Hexanone
<10 Tetrachloroethene
<50 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
<10 Toluene
<10 Chlorobenzene
<10 Ethylbenzene
<10 Styrene
Total xylenes
200
<50
<50
130
270
Reported by:
Checked by:
SURROGATE RECOVERIES (%}
dk-l,2-dichloroethane 94
d3-toluene 97
-------
ERCO/
A DIVISION Of
ENSECO
I\'CORPOR/W£D
CLIENT:
CLIENT ID:
ERCO ID:
SAMPLE RECEIVED:
ANALYSIS COMPLETED:
HWMSS-42
Extract 3B (SS) - Initial Filtrate
28616
03/20/86
04/14/86
RESULTS IN: ug/1
SUMMARY OF ORGANIC
PRIORITY POLLUTANT ANALYSIS
VOLATILE ORGANIC
COMPOUNDS
- Data Report -
Compound
Result
Compound
Result
Chloromethane
Bromomethane
Vinyl chloride
Chloroethane
Methylene chloride
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
1,1-D1chloroethene
1,1-Dichloroethane
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
1,2-Dichloroethane
2-Butanone
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Vinyl acetate
Bromodi chlorome thane
<25 1,2-Dichloropropane .
<25 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
<25 Trichloroethene
<25V Dibromochloromethane
<25 ' lrl,2-TrichlorQethane .
<250 Benzene
<10 cis-l,3-Dichloropropene
<10 2-Chloroethylvinylether
<10 Bromoform
<10 4-Methyl-2-pentanone
<10 2-Hexanone
<10 - Tetrachloroethene
<50 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
<10 Toluene
<10 Chlorobenzene
<10 Ethylbenzene
<10 Styrene
Total xylenes
43
<50
<50
160
Reported by:Witi-
Checked by: -£i
SURROGATE RECOVERIES (%): dw-l,2-dichloroethane 95
d8 -toluene 97
-------
INCORPORATED
CLIENT:
CLIENT,ID:
ERGO ID:
SAMPLE RECEIVED:
ANALYSIS COMPLETED:
RESULTS IN:
HWMSS-42
SlMyLARY OF ORGANIC
Extract 4A (SS) - Initial Filtrate PRIORITY POLLUTANT ANALYSIS
28346
03/17/86
04/12/86
ue/i
.VOLATILE ORGANIC
COMPOUNDS
- Data'Report -
Compound
Result
Compound
Result
Chloromethane
Bromomethane
Vinyl chloride
Chloroethane
Methylene chloride
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,1-Dichloroe ohane
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
1,2-Dichloroethane
2-Butanone
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Vinyl acetate
Bromodichloromethane
<25 1,2-Dichloropropane
<25 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
<25 Trichloroethene
<25 Dibromochloromethane
<25 1,1,2-Trichloroethane
<250 Benzene
<10 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
<10 2-Chloroethylvinylether
<10 Bromoform
<10 4-Methyl-2-£entanone
19 2-Hexanone
<10 Tetrachloroethene
<50 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
<10 Toluene
<10 Chlorobenzene
<10 Ethylbenzene
<10 Styrenp
Total xylenes
80
<50
<50
140
Reported by:
Checked by:
TRB
N/5
SURROGATE RECOVERIES (%):
d4-l,2-dichloroethane 96
de-toluene " .100
-------
ERCO/
A DIVISIO\ OF
ENSECO
1XCORPORAJID
CLIENT:
CLIENT ID:
ERCO ID:
SAMPLE RECEIVED:
ANALYSIS COMPLETED:
HWMSS-45
SUMMARY OF ORGANIC
Extract 4B (SS) - Initial Filtrate PRIORITY POLLUTANT ANALYSIS
28347
03/17/86
04/12/86
RESULTS IN: ug/l
VOLATILE ORGANIC
COMPOUNDS
- Data Report -
Compound
Result
Compound
Result
Chlorome thane
Bromome thane
Vinyl chloride
Chloroethane
Methylene chloride
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
1 , 1-Di chloroethene
1 , 1-Dichloroethane
trans- 1 , 2 -Di chloroethene
Chloroform
1 ,2-Di Chloroethane
2-Butanone
1 , 1 , 1-Tri Chloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Vinyl acetate
Bromodichloromethane
<25
<25
<25
<25
<25
<250
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
<50
<10
<10
<10
<10
1 ,2-Di chloropropane
trans- 1 , 3-Dichloropropene
Trichloroethene
Dibromochlorome thane
1 , 1 ,2-Tri Chloroethane
Benzene
cis-1 , 3-Dichloropropene
2-Chloroethylvinylether
Bromoform
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
2-Hexanone
Tetrachloroethene
1,1, 2 ,2-Tetrachloroe thane
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbenzene
Styrene
Total xylenes
<10
<10
<10
<10
<10
110
<10
<10
<10
<50 .
<50
" "--
-------
CLIENT: HWMSS-42
ERCO/A Division of ENSECO
SAMPLE RECEIVED: 03/11/86
ANALYSIS COMPLETED: 04/05/86
- RESULTS IN: jjg/1 (ppb)
REPORTED BY: JFM
CHECKED BY: NS
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS
BY EPA METHOD 624
- Data Report -
Page 1 of 2
Initial Filtrates
Minimum
reporting
Compound limit
Chloromethane 5
Bromomethane 5
Vinyl chloride 5
Chloroethane 5
Methylene chloride 5
Acetone 50
Carbon disulfide 2
1,1-Dichloroethene 2
1,1-Dichloroethane 2
trans-l,2-Dichloroethene 2
Chloroform 2
1,2-Di chloroethane " 2
2-Butanorie 10
1,1,1-Tri chloroethane 2
Carbon tetra chloride 2
Vinyl acetate 2
Bromodi chloromethane 2
1,2-Di chloropropane 2
trans-l,3-Dichloropropene 2
Trichloroethene 2
Dibromochloromethane 2
1,1,2-Tri chloroethane 2
Benzene 2
cis-l,3-Dichloropropene 2
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether 2
Bromoform 2
2-Hexanone 10
4-Methyl-2-pentanone 10
Tetrachloroethene . 2
1,1, 2, 2-Tetra chloroethane 2
Toluene 2
Chlorobenzene 2
Ethylbenzene 2
Styrene 2
Total xylenes 2
Extract Extract
Client ID: 5A (SS) 5B (SS)
ERCO ID: 27997 27998
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
290 410
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND . ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
140 190
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
120 170
ND ND
40 43
ND ND
330 380
ND = Not detected.
-------
-U
CLIENT: HWMSS-42
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS
BY EPA METHOD 624
- Data Report -
Page 2 of 2
Initial Filtrates
Additional
compounds
Unknowns
Extract
Client ID: 5A (SS)
ERGO ID: 27997
X
Extract
5B (SS)
27998
X
Dilution factor:
Multiply minimum reporting limit by dilution factor to obtain true minimum limit.
X = Present.
Surrogate
Recoveries
% Recovery d^-l,2-Dichloroethane
113
111
% Recoveiy d8-Toluene
75
81
-------
ERCO/
Of
ENSECO
/.\'CORPOR-U£D
CLIENT:
CLIENT ID:
ERCO ID:
SAMPLE RECEIVED:
ANALYSIS COMPLETED:
RESULTS IN:
HWMSS-42
Extract 6A (SS) - Initial Filtrate
28454
03/18/86
04/12/86
ug/1 (ppb)
SUMMARY OF ORGANIC
PRIORITY POLLUTANT ANALYSIS
VOLATILE ORGANIC
COMPOUNDS
- Data Report -
Compound
Result
Compound
Result
Chloromethane
Bromomethane
Vinyl chloride
Chioroethane
Methylene chloride
Acetone
Carbon disulfide
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,1-Dichloroethane
trans-1,2-DichJLoroethene
Chloroform
1,2-Dichloroethane
2-Butanone
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Vinyl acetate
Bromodi chloromethane
<25 1,2-Dichloropropane
<25 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
<25 Trichloroethene
<25 Dibromochloromethane
<25 1,1,2-Trichloroethane
<250 Benzene
<25 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
<25 2-Chloroethylvinylether
<25 Bromoform
<25 4-Methyl-2rpentanone
<25 2-Hexanone
<25 "Tetrachloroethene
<50 '1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
<25 Toluene
<25 Chlorobenzene
<25 Ethylbenzene
<25' Styrene
Total xylenes
<25
<25
<25
<25
<25
110
<25
<25
<25
<50
<50
<25
- 15
<25
<25
<25
150
Reported by:
Checked by:
SURROGATE RECOVERIES (%):
dw-l,2-dichloroethane 108
d8-toluene 95
-------
INCORPORATED
CLIENT:
CLIENT ID:
ERGO ID:
SAMPLE RECEIVED:
ANALYSIS COMPLETED:
RESULTS IN:
HWMSS-42
SUMMARY OF ORGANIC
Extract 6A (SS) - Initial Filtrate PRIORITY POLLUTANT ANALYSIS
28455
03/18/86
04/13/86
ug/1 (ppb)
VOLATILE ORGANIC
COMPOUNDS
- Data Report -
Compound
Result
Compound
Result
Chloromethane
Bromomethane
Vinyl chloride
Chloroethane
Methylene chloride
Acetone
Carton disulfide
1,1-Dichloroethene
1,1-Dichloroethane
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
1,2-Di chloroe thane
2-Butanone
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Vinyl acetate
Bromodi chloromethane
<25 1,2-Dichloropropane
<25 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
<25 Trichloroethene
<25 Dibromochloromethane
<25 1,1,2-Trichloroethane
<250 Benzene ,.__ .
<10 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
<10 2-Chloroethylvinylether
<10 Bromoform
<10 4-Methyl-2-pentanone
<10 2-Hexanone
<10 Tetraehloroethene
~<50 l,l,2,2-Tetrachloroethane~
<10 Toluene
<10 Chlorobenzene
<10 Ethylbenzene
<10 Styrene
Total xylenes
110
<50
<50
-------
CLIENT : HWMSS-42
SAMPLE RECEIVED: 01/29/86
ANALYSIS COMPLETED: 02/05/86
RESULTS IN: uS/1 (ppb)
REPORTED BY: CTF^
CHECKED BY: Ns
ERCO/A Division of ENSECO
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS
BY EPA METHOD 624
- Data Report -
Page 1 of 2
j- Initial Filtrates-.
Minimum
reporting Client ID:
Compound limit ERCO ID:
Chloromethane 5
Bromomethane 5
Vinyl chloride 5
Chloroethane 5
Methylene chloride 5
Acetone 50
Carbon disulfide 2
1 , 1-Dichloroethene 2
1 , 1-Dichloroethane 2
trans-l,2-Dichloroethene 2
Chloroform 2
1,2-Dichloroethane 2
2-Butanone 10
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 2
Carbon tetrachloride 2
Vinyl acetate 2
Bromodichloromethane 2
1,2-Dichloropropane 2
trans-l,3-Dichloropropene, 2
Trichloroethene 2
Dibromo chloromethane 2
1 , 1 ,2-Tri chloroethane 2
Benzene 2
cis-l,3-Dichloropropene 2
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether 2
Bromoform 2
2-Hexanone 10
4-Methyl-2-pentanone 10
Tetrachloroethene 2
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 2
Toluene 2
Chlorobenzene 2
Ethylbenzene 2
Styrene 2
Total xylenes 2
Extract Extract
7A-(SS) 7B-(SS)
26008 26009
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
33 . 34
ND 250
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND 87
ND ND .
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
130 170
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
59 ' 110
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
190 82
ND = Not detected.
-------
CLIENT: HWMSS-42
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS
BY EPA METHOD 624
- Data Report -
Page 2 of 2
Additional
compounds
Client ID:
ERGO ID:
Extract
7A-(SS)
26008
Extract
7B-(SS)
26009
None detected
Dilution factor:
Multiply minimum reporting limit by dilution factor to obtain true minimum limit.
Surrogate
Recoveries
% Recovery d^-l^-Dichloroethane 103
108
% Recovery dg-Toluene
99
106
-------
CLIENT: HWMSS-42
ERCO/A Division of ENSECO
SAMPLE RECEIVED: 01/27/86
ANALYSIS COMPLETED: 02/04/86
RESULTS IN: U£/l (ppb)
REPORTED BY: Jftt
CHECKED BY: N$
Minimum
reporting
Compound limit
Chloromethane 5
Bromomethane 5
Vinyl chloride 5
Chloroethane 5
Methylene chloride 5
Acetone 50
Carbon disulfide 2
1 , 1 -Di chloroe thene 2
1 , 1-Di chloroethane 2
trans-l,2-Dichloroethene 2
Chloroform 2
i - 2 Di ehloroe thane 2
j. _ -<6»-^^X ^wiiiVJA wC UJ^CU^C C :
2-Butanone 10 " ~
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 2
Carbon tetrachloride 2
Vinyl acetate 2
Bromodi Chloromethane 2
1 , 2 -Di chloropropane 2
trans-l,3-Dichloropropene; 2
Tri chloroe thene 2
Dibromochloromethane 2
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 2
Benzene 2
cis-l,3-Dichloropropene 2
2 -Chloroe thy 1 vinyl ether 2
Bromoform 2
2-Hexanone 10
4-Methyl-2-pentanone 10
Tetrachloroethene 2
1,1,2,2-Tetraehloroethane 2
Toluene 2
Chlorobenzene 2
Ethylbenzene 2
Styrene 2
Total xylenes 2
VOLATILE ORGMICS ANALYSIS
BY EPA METHOD 624
- Data Report -
Page 1 of 2
P Initial Filtrates-.
Extract Extract
Client ID: 8A-(SS) 8B-(SS)
ERCO ID: 25892 25893
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
250 150
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND NT)
-" . nLf IIL/
60 " ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
120 150
ND . ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
ND ND
68 99
ND ND
* 32
ND ND
74 130
ND = Not detected.
-------
CLIENT: HWMSS-42
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS
BY EPA METHOD 624
- Data Report -
Page 2 of 2
1 Initial Filtrate ,
Additional Client ID:
compounds ERCO ID:
Extract Extract
8A-(SS) 8B-(SS)
25892 25893
None Detected
Dilution factor:
5 5
Multiply minimum reporting limit by dilution factor to obtain true minimum limit,
X = Present.
Surrogate
Recoveries
% Recovery ^-1,2-Dichloroethane
89
100
% Recovery d8-Toluene
98
100
-------
Ammonia-Lime Still Bottoms
Benzene
Liquid/Solid Ratio A-a
1/4(1,025 + 960 + 675 + 880) - 1/4(740 + 660 + 880 + 785) = 118.75
% Headspace B-b
1/4(1,025 '+ 960 + 740 + 660) - 1/4(675 + 880 + 880 + 785) = 41.25
Acidity of Fluid #1 C-c
1/4(1,025 + 675 + 740 + 880) - 1/4(960 + 880 + 660 + 785) = 8.75
Device D-d
1/4(1,025 + 960 + 880 + 785) - 1/4(675 + 880 + 740 + 660) = 173.75
Collection Method E-e
1/4(1,025 + 675 + 660 + 785) - 1/4(960 + 880 + 740 + 880) = -78.75
Aliquotting F-f
1/4(1,025 + 880 + 740 + 785) - 1/4(960 + 675 + 660 + 880) = 63.75
Pressure Behind Piston G-g
1/4(1,025 + 880 + 660 + 880) - 1/4(960 + 675 + 740 + 785) = 71.25
Ed2 = 1502 + 802 + 302 + 2402 * 402 + 1002 * ISO2 + 3702 = 268,300
- 129.49
= 64.75
t(p = 0.01, df = 8) = 3.355(64.75) = 217.23
Nothing significant.
-------
Ammonia-Lime Still Bottoms
Chlorobenzene
Liquid/Solid Ratio A-a
1/4(790 + 805 + 830 + 865) - 1/4(780 + 680 +835 + 720) = 68.75
% Headspace B-b
1/4(790 + 805 + 780 + 680) - 1/4(830 + 865 + 835 + 720) = -48.75
Acidity of Fluid #1 C-c
1/4(790 + 830 + 780 + 835) - 1/4(805 + 865 + 680 + 720) = 41.25
Device D-d
1/4(790 + 805 + 835 + 720) - 1/4(830 + 865 + 780 + 680) - -1.25
Collection Method E-e
1/4(790 + 830 + 680 + 720) - 1/4(805 + 865 + 780 +835) = -66.25
Aliquotting F-f
1/4(790 + 865 + 780 + 720) - 1/4(805 + 830 + 680 + 835) = 1.25
Pressure Behind Piston G-g
1/4(790 + 865 + 680 + 835) - 1/4(805 + 830 + 780 + 720) = 8.75
Zd2 = 3002 + HO2 + ISO2 + 2702 + 602 + ISO2 + 1302 + 2802 = 338,700
s = .fz? = 145.49
"
sd = s = 72.74
f n
t(p = 0.01, df = 8) = 3.355(72.74) = 244-07
Nothing significant.
-------
Ammonia-Lime Still Bottoms
1,1-Dichloroethene
Liquid/Solid Ratio A-a
1/4(940 + 930 + 440 + 530) - 1/4(485 + 430 + 1,400 + 880} = -88.75
% Headspace B-b
1/4(940 + 930 * 485 + 430) - 1/4(440 + 530 + 1,400 + 880) = -116.25
Acidity of Fluid #1 C-c
1/4(940 + 440 + 485 + 1,400) - 1/4(930 + 530 + 430 + 880) = 123.75
Device D-d
1/4(940 + 930 + 1,400 + 880) - 1/4(440 + 530 + 485 + 430) = 566.25*
Collection Method E-e
1/4(940 + 440 + 430 + 880) - 1/4(930 + 530 + 485 + 1,400) = -163.75
Aliquotting F-f
1/4(940 + 530 + 485 + 880) - 1/4(930 + 440 + 430 + 1,400) = -91.25
Pressure Behind Piston G-g
1/4(940 + 530 + 430 + 1,400) - 1/4(930 + 440 + 485 + 880) = 141.25
Zd2 = 3202 + 1402 + 2002 + 2202 + 2302 + 2602 + 4002 * 4402 = 684,500
s = .fid2 = 206.84
Sd = sJT = 103.^2
ln
t(p = 0.01, df = 8) = y. 355 (103. 42) = 346.97
*Signif leant effect.
-------
Ammonia-Lime Still Bottoms
Toluene
Liquid/Solid Ratio A-a
1/4(845 + 1,000 + 540 + 875) - 1/4(835 + 660 + 870 + 745) = 37.50
% Headspace B-b
1/4(845 + 1,000 + 835 + 660) - 1/4(540 + 875 + 870 + 745) = 77.50
Acidity of Fluid #1 C-c
1/4(845 + 540 + 835 + 870) - 1/4(1,000 + 875 + 660 + 745) - -47.50
Device D-d
1/4(845 + 1,000 + 870 + 745) - 1/4(540 + 875 + 835 + 660) = 137.50
Collection Method E-e
1/4(845 + 540 + 660 + 745) - 1/4(1,000 + 875 + 835 + 870) = -197.50
Aliquotting F-f
1/4(845 + 875 + 835 + 745) - 1/4(1,000 + 540 + 660 + 870) = 57.50
Pressure Behind Piston G-g
1/4(845 + 875 + 660 + 870) - 1/4(1,000 + 540 + 835 +745) = 32.50
Zd2 = 3102 + 2002 + 3202 + 2502 + 502 + 1402 + 1402 + 3502 = 465,200
s = JTd2" = 170.51
2k
sd = SfTK" " 85.26
t(p = 0.01, df = 8) = 3.355(85.26) = 286.04
Nothing significant.
-------
Ammonia-Lime Still Bottoms
Trichloroethene
Liquid/Solid Ratio A-a
1/4(805 + 795 + 700 + 825) - 1/4(720 + 605 +820 + 680) = 75.00
% Headspace B-b
1/4(805 + 795 + 720 + 605) - 1/4(700 + 825 + 820" + 680) = -25.00
*
Acidity of Fluid #1 C-c
1/4(805 + 700 + 720 + 820) - 1/4(795 + 825 + 605 + 680) = 35.00
Device D-d
1/4(805 + 795 + 820 + 680) - 1/4(700 + 825 + 720 + 605) = 62.50
Collection Method E-e
1/4(805 + 700 + 605 + 680) - 1/4(795 + 825 + 720 + 820) = -92.50
Aliquotting F-f
1/4(805 + 825 + 720 + 680) - 1/4(795 + 700 + 605 + 820) = 27.50
Pressure Behind Piston G-g
1/4(805 + 825 + 605 + 820) - 1/4(795 + 700 + 720 + 680) = 40.00
Zd2 = 2502 + 1302 + O2 + 2902 + 602 + HO2 + 1802 + 3002 = 301,600
3 =
2k
sd
t(p = 0.01, df = 8) - 3.355(68.65) = 230.31
Nothing significant.
-------
API Separator Sludge/Electroplating Waste
Benzene
Liquid/Solid Ratio A-a
1/4(990 + 830 + 765 + 660) - 1/4(805 + 680 + 815 +865) = 20
% Headspace B-b
»
1/4(990 + 830 + 805 + 680) - 1/4(765 + .660 + 815 + 865) =50
Acidity of Fluid #1 C-c
1/4(990 * 765 + 805 +815) - 1/4(830 + 660 +680+865) = 85
Device D-d
1/4(990 + 830 + 815 + 865) - 1/4(765 + 660 + 805 + 680) = 147.5
Collection Method E-e
1/4(990 + 765 + 680 + 865) - 1/4(830 + 660 + 805 + 815) = 47.5
Aliquotting F-f
1/4(990 + 660 + 805 + 865) - 1/4(830 + 765 + 680 + 815) = 57.5
Pressure Behind Piston G-g
1/4(990 +660+680+815) - 1/4(830 +765+805+865) = -30
Id2 = 202 + 2202 + 1702 + 1202 + 3502 + 202 + 102 + 502 = 217,600
s = Zdf = 116.6
sd = SJT s 58-3
t(p = 0.01, df = 8) = 3-355(58.3 ) = 195.6
Nothing significant.
-------
API Separator Sludge/Electroplating Waste
Chlorobenzene
Liquid/Solid Ratio A-a
1/4(180 + 140 + 185 + 145) - 1/4(545 + 170 + 140 + 170) =-93.75
% Headspace B-b
1/4(180 + 140 + 545 + 170} - 1/4(185 + 145 + 140 +170) = 98.75
Acidity of Fluid #1 C-c
1/4(180 + 185 + 545 + 140) - 1/4(140 + 145 + 170 + 170) = 106.25
Device D-d
1/4(180 + 140 + 140 f 170) - 1/4(185 + 145 + 545 + 170) =-103.75
Collection Method E-e
1/4(180 + 185 + 170 + 170) - 1/4(140 + 145 + 545 + 140) =-66.25
Aliquotting F-f
1/4(180 + 145 + 545 + 170) - 1/4(140 + 185 + 170 + 140) = 101.25
Pressure Behind Piston G-g
1/4(180 + 145 + 170 + 140) - 1/4(140 + 185 + 545 + 170) = -101.25
Zd2 = O2 + 402 + 502 + 102 + 7702 + O2 + O2 + 402 = 598,700
s = J Idf = 193.44
2k
= si 2 = 96.72
ff
tip = 0.01, df = 8) = 3-355(96.72) = 324.49
Nothing significant.
-------
API Separator Sludge/Electroplating Waste
1 , 1-Di chloroethene
Liquid/Solid Ratio A-a
1/4(680 + 475 + 155 + 192.5) - 1/4(200 + 135 + 420 + 445) = 75.625
% Headspace B-b
1/4(680 + 475 + 200 + 135) - 1/4(155 + 192.5 + 420 + 445) = 69.375
Acidity of Fluid #1 C-c
1/4(680 + 155 + 200 + 420) - 1/4(475 + 192.5 + 135 + 445) = 51.875
Device D-d
1/4(680 + 475 + 420 + 445) - 1/4(155 + 192.5 + 200 +135) = 334-375*
Collection Method E-e
1/4(680 + 155 + 135 + 445) - 1/4(475 + 192.5 + 200 + 420) = 31.875
Aliquottlng F-f
1/4(680 + 192.5 + 200 + 445) - 1/4(475 + 155 + 135 + 420) = 83.125
Pressure Behind Piston G-g
1/4(680 + 192.5 + 135 + 420) - 1/4(475 + 155 + 200 + 445) = 38.125
= 2802 + 702 + 1102 + 1352 + 1002 + 102 + O2 + 302 = 124,625
s = /I'd2 = 88.256
= 44.128
t(p = 0.01, df = 8) = 3-355(44.128) = 148.049
*Signif leant effect.
-------
API Separator Sludge/Electroplating Waste
Toluene
Liquid/Solid Ratio A-a
1/4(880 + 685 + 660 +575) - 1/4(690 + 620 + 670 +845) = -6.25
% Headspace B-b
1/4(880-+ 685 + 690 + 620) - 1/4(660 + 575 + 670 + 845) = 31.25
Acidity of Fluid #1 C-c
1/4(880 + 660 + 690 + 670) - 1/4(685 + 575 + 620 + 845) = 43.75
Device D-d
1/4(880 + 685 + 670 + 845) - 1/4(660 + 575 + 690 + 620) = 133.75
Collection Method E-e
1/4(880 + 660 + 620 +845) - 1/4(685 + 575 + 690 + 670) = 96.25
Aliquotting F-f
1/4(880 + 575 + 690 +845) - 1/4(685 + 660 + 620 + 670) = 88.75
Pressure Behind Piston G-g
1/4(880 + 575 + 620 + 670) - 1/4(685 + 660 + 690 + 845) =-33-75
Zd2 = O2 + 1302 + 1602 + 302 + 2802 + O2 + O2 + 2302 » 174,700
s - /"Ed2 = 104.49
2k
Sd = S = 52.25
I n
t(p = 0.01, df = 8) = 3.355(52.25) = 175.29
Nothing significant
-------
API Separator Sludge/Electroplating Waste
Tri chloroethene
Liquid/Solid Ratio A-a
1/4(2^0 + 205 + 270 +215) - 1/4(535 + 205 +190+225) = -56.25
% Headspace B-b
»
, 1/4(240 + 205 + 535 +205) - 1/4(270 + 215 +190+225) = 71.25
Acidity of Fluid #1 C-c
1/4(240 + 270 + 535 + 190) - 1/4(205 + 215 +205+225) = 96.25
Device D-d
1/4(240 + 205 +190+225) - 1/4(270 + 215 + 535 +205) = -91.25
Collection Method E-e
1/4(240 +270+205+225) - 1/4(205 + 215 + 535 + 190) =-51.25
Allquottlng F-f
1/4(240 + 215 + 535 + 225) - 1/4(205 + 270 + 205 + 190) = 86.25
Pressure Behind Piston G-g ~~~
1/4(240 + 215 + 205 + 190) - 1/4(205 + 270 + 535 + 225) = -96.25
Id2 = O2 + 702 + 1402 + 102 + 7102 + 102 + O2 + 302 = 529,700
s = [rd2 = 181.95
1 2k
= 90.98
n
t(p = 0.01, df = 8) = 3-355(90.98 ) = 305.22
Nothing significant.
-------
ERCO
205 Alewiie Brook Parkway. Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138 (617) 66 1-3111 Telex 650-256-7697 (MO)
A DIVISION OF
ENSECO
INCORPORATED
June 11, 1986
Mr. Todd Kimmell
US EPA (WH-562B)
401 M Street S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20460
Dear Todd,
I have enclosed three bound copies and one unbound copy of the
ZHE Ruggedness Testing Final Report.
Let me explain why Nancy and I chose to spike only the solid.portion
of the waste. We considered spiking the waste directly but foresaw
several problems.
1. An efficient mixing of the spike with the waste would
have increased the potential loss of spiked compounds.
2. Spiking of the waste would have to be done before
every extraction thereby increasing variability.
3. Without mixing, the initial filtrate of a spiked
waste would not have been representative of the waste
or consistent from sample to sample.
4. We do not know how the spikes react with the samples.
Do they stick.to-the solid, remain in the liquid portion
or both? Variability in the percent solids could have
drastically affected the results.
Therefore, we decided to remove the initial filtrate and use our normal
method of spiking which is through a septum TEE arrangement as the
extraction fluid is pumped into the device. This method has proved
to be efficient and consistent in recovering spiked compounds.
We chose this method to reduce the variability introduced into the
experiment.
Mathematically combining the analytical results of the initial and
final filtrates indicate that the initial filtrates of these wastes
contribute nothing to the final concentration of compounds.
We welcome any comments. Please don't hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
&&^ ^U^WA,
Regional and international offices: Be tsy* Henry Q
Suite MS, Statesman Insurance Building, 3815 Montrose, Houston, Texas 77006 (713) 523-7311
525 Centra/Avenue, Cedarhurst, New York 11516 (516) 295-1162
c/o Bectech Trading Co., Ltd., P.O. Box 101-41, Taipei, Taiwan (R.O.C.) Tel. 5013908
------- |