FINAL REPORT
«M
HUMAN HEALTH -DAMAGES FROM MOBILE SOURCE AIR POLLUTION
A Delphi Study
Steve Leung
California Air Resources Board
Sacramento, California 95814
Elliot Goldstein, M.D.
University of California
Davis, California 95616
Norman Dal key, Ph.D.
University of California
Los Angeles, California 90024
Contract No. 68-01-1889
Project No. 07AAC-02
Program Element 1H-1094
Project Officer
John Jaksch, Ph.D.
Resource Analysis Staff
Washington Environmental Research Center
Washington, D.C. 20460
Prepared for
Washington Environmental Research Center
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Washington, D.C. 20460
March 1975
-------
or"
.'•• $•?* tuniir
/y JJ^A
fa^4^M
cf^iii
\fe>/^--^A/7
*-••-?;
;.iJ.'A-'>
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THE RESOURCES AGENCY
H ^
il K"
A§R RESOURCES BOARD
MARCH 1975
-------
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This report discusses the results of a survey among a group of 14 health
experts on the human damages from mobile source air pollution. This survey
includes three major air pollutants, photochemical oxidant, nitrogen dioxide,
and carbon monoxide. The study was supported by the U.S. Environmental
'Protection Agency.
The research method used in this study was a variant of the Delphi technique.
This approach uses a panel of experts to arrive at a group consensus on the
dose-response relationship for each of the pollutants. This method improves
the quality of judgments of relatively uncertain issues by experts. The basic
assumption is that the most accurate assessment of a problem where data is
incomplete can be obtained by canvassing a group of experts and accepting the
group consensus.
The Delphi technique involves three steps. Estimates are first obtained
independently from the experts. The panel is then informed of the distribution
of answers on the first round, and is asked to reestimate their answers for
questions with large disagreement. The third step involves the compilation of
the final estimates which include'answers of the second round and those in the
first round with good agreement. In this study, these final estimates were
reported in the form of median and interquartile range. Answers from each
round were also reduced and expressed in a S-shaped dose-response curve by
using the logistic distribution model. The accuracy of these group responses
were evaluated by means of the data dispersion and self-confidence ratings.
In arriving the group estimates, the experts were asked to answer a set of
questionnaires. The questionnaire was designed to allow the experts to
estimate one hour concentrations of oxidant, nitrogen dioxide, or carbon monoxide
which would induce specific functional abnormalities in 14 population categories.
-------
These categories are:
Normal
Children
Old Age
Heart Condition, Mild
Heart Condition, Severe
Hay.Fever, Sinusitis
Influenza
Upper Respiratory Infection
Asthma
Acute Viral Bronchitis
Acute Bacterial Pneumonia
Chronic Respiratory Diseases
Mild Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease
Severe Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease
The population varies significantly in their response to a given pollutant
exposure independent of the health status of the group. The questionnaire
considered this variation by querying the concentration at which 90%, 50%,
10%, and 0% of the population would be expected to manifest the stated ab-
normality. In addition to estimating these points, the experts indicated a
range of pollutant concentrations for each dose-response result to allow
limits for each estimate. The experts also estimated the duration in hours
of the abnormalities. Self-ratings were given for each of the answers.
The first round data were analyzed for group agreement with the feed-back
criterion. Those answers with interquartile range greater than one-half of the
median were fed back to the panel members for re-estimation. Using this stringent
criterion, two-thirds of the estimates for oxidant, about 90% of the estimates for
CO, and all of the estimates for NOo were iterated.
The second criterion used for validity measurment in the study was self-confidence
rating. The rating ranges from 1-10, where 1 meant "the answer is a sheer guess,"
and 10 meant "the panelist knows the answer very well." An average self-rating
-ii-
-------
of 5 or higher was used as the cut-off point for acceptable confidence score.
Based on this self-rating scale, the experts have higher confidence in their
answers for photochemical oxidant and carbon monoxide questionnaires than
those for nitrogen dioxide. The panel members gave an average .self-rating
score of 5 or higher in about 50% of their answers for both the photochemical
oxidants and carbon monoxide questionnaires, and only in 25% of their answers
for nitrogen dioxide.
A different criterion was used to evaluate the degree of agreement within the
group on answers in the second round. The estimate is considered to have
good group agreement if its standard deviation is equal to or less than one-
third of the median value. Based on this criterion, good agreement is observed
in 58%, 17% and 8% of answers for the photochemical oxidants, carbon monoxide
and nitrogen dioxide questionnaires, respectively. In comparison with the
first round data, there is a definite improvement in group agreement in the
second round.
The final best estimates of pollutant concentrations causing incapacity,
disability and discomfort for all population categories in different affected
population fractions are summarized in Tables 1-3.
Improvement in group agreement was observed in the second round answers. At
the same time, the bias in the answers alvso increases on the second round
because of the feed-back information. By using the self-rating score and the
standard deviations as the criteria, the second round data is classified into
three categories: "trustworthy," "doubtful" and "not trustworthy." The
distribution of answers of the three pollutants in these three categories are
summarized as follows:
Oxidant CO
Trustworthy 34% 10% 1%
Doubtful 26% 8% 7%
Not Trustworthy 40% • 82% 92%
-m-
-------
TABLE 1: Final Best Estimates, Photochemical Oxidant Concentrations (ppm)
Incapacity, Disability and Discomfort in Different Population Fractions
Population
Category
Normal
Children
Old Age
Heart Condition, Severe
r
*,
Heart Condition, Mild
Hay .Fever, Sinusiti-s
Upper Respiratory
Infection
Asthma
Viral Bronchitis
Bacterial Pneumonia
Influenza
Chronic Respiratory
Disease
Mild Chronic
Obstructive Disease
Severe Chronic
Obstructive Disease
Incapacity
0%
0.30
0.30
0.32
0.30
0.35
0.27
0.30
0.30
0.30
0:30
0.30
0.35
0.32
0.20
10%
0.77
0.70
0.70
0.60
0.80
0.60
0.62
0.60
0.60
0.75
0.65
0.62
0.80
0.50
50%
1.02
1.00
1.00
0.95
1.00
0.85
0.92
0.80
0.85
0.92
0.82
0.93
1.00
0.75
90%
1.50
1.40
1.40
1.20
1.45
1.00
1.20
1.00
1.20
1.20
1.00
1.45
1.20
1.00
Disability
0%
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.23
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.13
1 10%
0.41
0.50
0.55
0.5'2
0.60
0.50
0.50
0.40
0.40
0.50
0.40'
0.47
0.50'
0.40
50%
0.80
0.70
0.72
0.77
0.80
0.65
0.67
0.60
0.55
0.60
0.60
0.70
0.80
0.55
90%
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.15
0.80
0.95
0.80
0.80
0.80
0.80
1.05
1.00
0.75
Discomfort
0%
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.15
0.15
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
10%
0.30
0.30
0.30
0.40
0.40
0.30,
0.30
0.30
0.30
0.30
0.30
0.30
0.40
0.20
50%
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.40
0.50
0.40
0.40
0.40
0.40
0.50
0.52
0.32
i
90%
0.80
0.75
0.70
0.75
0.70
0.50
0.70
0.60
0.60
0.55
0.60
0.60
0.60
0.42
<
I
-------
TABLE 2: Final Best Estimates,. Carbon Monoxide Concentrations (ppm)
Incapacity, Disability and Discomfort in Different Population Fractions
Population
Category
Normal
Children
Old Age
Heart Condition, Severe
Heart Condition, Mild
Hay Fever, Sinusitis
Upper Respiratory
Infection
Asthma
Viral Bronchitis
Bacterial Pneumonia
Influenza
Chronic Respiratory
Disease
Mild Chronic
Obstructive Disease
Severe Chronic
Obstructive Disease
Incapacity
0%
110.0
100.0
100.0
60.0
77.5
97.5
100.0
100,0
100.0
100.0
97.5
100. 0
100.0
92.5
10%
205.0
187.5
180.0
100.0
160.0
170.0
167.5
172.5
162.5
170.0
151.0
150.0
152.5
140.0
50% ;
262.5
235.0
210.0
180.0
190.0
250.0
225.0
225.0
215.0
2.00.0
215.0
200.0
205.0
180.0
90%
300.0-
300.0
300.0
190.0
215.0
300.0
300.0
300.0
300.0
215.0
300.0
225.0
275.0
205.0
Disability
10%
80.0
60.0
62.5
45.0
50.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
65.0
60.0
60.0
59.0
60.0
60.0
10%
.160.0
145.0
240.0
80.0
120.0
130.0
125.0
140.0
120.0
115.0
120.0
110.0
127.5
100.0
50%
182.5
165.0
167.5
122.5
150.0
165.0
170.0
165.0
160.0
150.0
167.5
155.0
155.0
140.0
90%
225.0
200.0
200.0
150.0
170.0
200.0
200.0
197.5
200.0
180.0
200.0
180.0
190.0
170.0
Discomfort
0%
45.0
35.0
32.5
25.0
30.0
40.0
40.0
37.5
40.0
40.0
35.0
39.5
40.0
32.5
10%
100.0
80.0
80.0
55.0
72.5
80.0
80.0
84.0
80.0
77.5
70.0
75.0
65.0
60.0
50%
120.0
105.0.
103.5
65.0
110.0
115.0
105.0
110.0
100.0
100.0
105.0
95.0
100.0
90.0
90%
140.0
120.0
130.0
90.0
119.0
135.0
140:0
130.0
131.0
120.0
135.0
125.0
140.0
100.0
-------
TABLE 3: Final Best Estimates, Nitrogen Dioxide Concentrations (ppm)
Incapacity, Disability and Discomfort in Different Population Fractions
Population
Category
Normal
Children
Old Age
Heart Condition, Severe
Heart Condition, Mild
Hay Fever, Sinusitis
Upper Respiratory
Infection
Asthma
Viral Bronchitis
Bacterial Pneumonia
Influenza
Chronic Respiratory
Disease
Mild Chronic
Obstructive Disease
Severe Chronic
Obstructive Disease
Incapacity
0%
4.70
4.25
3.85
3.45
3.85
3.50
3.50
4.00
3.75
4.25
3.50
3.75
3.50
3.00
10%
2.50
2.50
2.25
1.90
2.35
2.50
2.25
2.00
2.50
2.10
2.45
2.60
2.35
1.75
50%
8.00
6.50
6.00
6.00
5.50
5.50
4.50
5.00
5.50
5. -50
4.50
4.90
4.85
3.60
90%
10.00
8.00
8.00
8.00
8.00
7.00
5.75
6.00
7.00
6.50
6.00
6.00
6.00
4.50
Disability
0%
1.60
1.60
1.50
1.55
1.60
1.70
1.50
1.60
1.50
1.50
1.75
1.75
1.60
1.30
10%
3.75
3.35
3.00
2.90
3.10
3.00
3.00
3.15
3.00
2.75
3.00
3.30
2.90'
2.35
50%
4.50
4,25
4.00
4.00
4.15
4.00
3,75
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.20
3.65
3,05
90%
6.00
5.50
5.00
5.50
6.00
5.50
4.75
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
4.80
3.60
Discomfort
0%
1.00
1.05
1.20
0.75
1.00
1.15
1.00
1.10
1.25
1.00
1.30
1.00
1.00
0.75
10%
2.50
2.20
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.40
2.10
2.45
2.10
1.85
2.10
2.00
1.60
1.50
50%
3.25
3.00
3.00
3.00
3.10
3.50
3.10
3.00
3.15
3.25
3.00
3.20
2.65
2.10
90%
4.90
4.65
4.00
3.50
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
3.85
3.70
3.55
3.00
-------
In examining the Delphi data and the available experimental data, it is
observed that these data are comparable to each other. The limited number
of "trustv/orthy" answers in the finalized results, especially in the area
pertaining to the health effects of nitrogen dioxide and carbon monoxide, is
really a reflection of the lack of actual data to form a basis for the
panelists to come to a better group agreement.
Based on the interpretation of data obtained in this study, one may
conclude that Delphi technique is appropriate for formulating group judgments
in the air pollution health effects area. In the absence of experimental
data, use of Delphi techniques to obtain a broad and well-informed opinion
from a group of experts offers an important alternative to air pollution
control agencies for making decisions.
-vn-
-------
ABSTRACT
During the past year, the California Air Resources Board conducted a survey
of 14 health experts on the human damages from mobile source air pollution.
A variant of the Delphi technique was used in the study to arrive at a consensus
judgment of the experts on the dose-response relationship for photochemical
oxidants, nitrogen dioxide and carbon monoxide. The panel experts were requested
to answer questionnaires to provide dose-response for all three pollutants and
for healthy individuals as well as diseased or sensitive persons. The completed
questionnaires were analyzed and the group consensus were sent to the panel
members. The panel experts were then asked to answer the same questionnaires
again for a second time. The data obtained during the second round represents
the final group consensus.
In the first round survey, there was good agreement among the panel experts
for the health effects of oxida.nt on all categories of population, while the
data for both carbon monoxide and nitrogen dioxide was much less so. The results
of the second round survey showed improvement in group agreement for all three
pollutants.
This report was submitted by the California Air Resources Board in the fulfill-
ment of Contract No. 68-01-1889 under the sponsorship of the Environmental
Protection Agency. Work was completed as of June 1, 1974.
-vm-
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY i
ABSTRACT viii
TABLE OF CONTENTS ix
LIST OF FIGURES . . . ' x
LIST OF TABLES xi
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS xv
CONCLUSIONS xvi
RECOMMENDATIONS xvii
I. INTRODUCTION . . . 1
II. RESEARCH METHODS • • • ,
A. General Description 2
B. Measures of Central Tendency 3
C. Measures of Validity 5
D. Criteria for First Round Result Feedback 8
E. Confidence Limits 10
F. The Questionnaire 11
III. RESULTS .v 16
IV. DISCUSSION
A. General Comments 46
B. Dose-Response Model 47
C. Delphi Data vs. Experimental Data 56
V. REFERENCES 71
APPENDICES
A. Questionnaire
B. Second Round Survey Raw Data (Bound in separate report)
C. Second Round Survey Dose-Response Curves (Bound in separate report)
-ix-
-------
FIGURES
Page
Figure 1 Original Distribution 4
Figure 2 Underlying Normal Distribution 5
Figure 3 Change of Group Estimate as a Function of Group Error ... 9
Figure 4 Illustration of Distributions on Range Estimates 10
Figure 5 Comparison of Logit and Probit Density Functions 50
Figure 6 Comparison of Logit and Probit Dose-Response Curves .... 51
Figure 7 Comparison of Logit and Probit -- Least Squares Fit on the
Estimates (X) of Oxidant Dosage Caused Discomfort on
Normal Population 54
Figure 8 Comparison of Logit and Probit -- Least Squares Fit on
the Estimates (X) of Oxidant Dosage Caused Disability
on Normal Population 55
-x-
-------
TABLES
Page
Table 1 Final Best Estimates,
Photochemical Oxidant Concentrations (ppm)
Incapacity, Disability and Discomfort in Different
Population Fractions iv
Table 2 Final Best Estimates,
Carbon Monoxide Concentrations (ppm)
Incapacity, Disability and Discomfort in Different
Population Fractions v
Table 3. Final Best Estimates,
Nitrogen Dioxide Concentrations (ppm)
Incapacity, Disability and Discomfort in Different
Population Fractions vi
Table 4 Population Categories Which May be Affected,
Definition of Conditions for Incapacity, Disability
and Discomfort
Photochemical Oxidant and Nitrogen Dioxide '..'.. 14
Table 5 Population Categories Which May be Affected,
Definition of Conditions for Incapacity, Disability
and Discomfort
Carbon Monoxide 15
Table 6 Estimates of Effects on 0% of Population by Population
Category,
Photochemical Oxidant Concentrations (ppm),
First Round Survey 17
Table 7 Estimates of Effects on 10% of Population by Population
Category,
Photochemical Oxidant Concentrations (ppm),
First Round Survey 18
Table 8 Estimates of Effects on 50% of Population by Population
Category,
Photochemical Oxidant Concentrations (ppm)
First Round Survey 19
Table 9 Estimates of Effects on 90% of Population by Population
Category,
Photochemical Oxidant Concentrations (ppm),
First Round Survey 20
Table 10 Estimates of Effects on 0% of Population by Population
Category,
Nitrogen Dioxide Concentrations (ppm),
First Round Survey " 21
-XI-
-------
Page
Table 11 Estimates of Effects on 10% of Population by Population
Category,
Nitrogen Dioxide Concentrations (ppm),
First Round Survey 22
Table 12 Estimates of Effects on 50% of Population by Population
Category,
Nitrogen Dioxide Concentrations (ppm),
First Round Survey 23
Table 13 Estimates of Effects on 90% of Population by Population
Category,
Nitrogen Dioxide Concentrations (ppm),
First Round Survey 24
Table 14 Estimates of Effects on 0% of Population by Population
Category,
Carbon Monoxide Concentrations (ppm),
First Round Survey 25
\
Table 15 Estimates of Effects on 10% of Population by Population
Category,
Carbon Monoxide Concentrations (ppm),
Fir.st Round Survey 26
Table 16 Estimates of Effects on 50% of Population by Population
Category,
Carbon Monoxide Concentrations (ppm),
First Round Survey 27
Table 17 Estimates of Effects on 90% of Population by Population
Category, v
Carbon Monoxide Concentrations (ppm),
First Round Survey •. . . . 28
Table 18 Estimates of Effects on 0% of Population by Population
Category,
Photochemical Oxidant Concentrations (ppm),
Second Round Survey • 30
Table 19 Estimates of Effects on 10% of Population by Population
Category,
Photochemical Oxidant Concentrations (ppm),
Second Round Survey 31
Table 20 Estimates of Effects on 50% of Population by Population
Category,
Photochemical Oxidant Concentrations (ppm),
Second Round Survey , 32
-xn-
-------
Page
Table 21 Estimates of Effects on 90% of Population by Population
Category,
Photochemical Oxidant Concentrations (ppm),
Second Round Survey 33
Table 22 Estimates of Effects on 0% of Population by Population
Category,
Nitrogen Dioxide Concentrations (ppm),
Second Round Survey 34
Table 23 Estimates of Effects on 10% of Population by Population
Category,
Nitrogen Dioxide Concentrations (ppm),
Second Round Survey 35
Table 24 Estimates of Effects on 50% of Population by Population
Category,
Nitrogen Dioxide Concentrations (ppm),
Second Round Survey . 36
Table 25 Estimates of Effects on 90% of Population by Population
Category,
Nitrogen Dioxide Concentrations (ppm),
Second Round Survey 37
Table 26 Estimates of Effects on 0% of Population by Population
Category,
Carbon Monoxide Concentrations (ppm),
Second Round Survey ' . 38
Table 27 Estimates of Effects on 10% of Population by Population
Category,
Carbon Monoxide Concentrations (ppm),
Second Round Survey 39
Table 28 Estimates of Effects on 50% of Population by Population
Category,
Carbon Monoxide Concentrations (ppm),
Second Round Survey 40
Table 29 Estimates of Effects on 90% of Population by Population
Category,
Carbon Monoxide Concentrations (ppm),
Second Round Survey 41
Table 30 Classification of the Trustworthiness of the Second Round
Answers Pertaining to the Health Effects of the Photo-
chemical Oxidants on Normal Individuals and Those With
Different Underlying Illness . 43
-xm-
-------
Table 31 Classification of the Trustworthiness of the Second Round
Answers Pertaining to the Health Effects of Carbon
Monoxide on Normal Individuals and Those With
Different Underlying Illness ............... 44
Table 32 Classification of the Trustworthiness of the Second Round
Answers Pertaining to the Health Effects of Nitrogen
Dioxide on Normal Individuals and Those With
Different Underlying Illness ............... 45
Table 33 Comparison of Mean for Lower and Upper Limits (Y|_ and
for 50% Population With the Mean Best Estimates for
10% and 90» Population (XIQ and Xqn, all normalized
to X50) ......................... 47
Table 34 Summary of Experimental Data on Oxidant Effects Relevant
to the Delphi Data .................... 57
Table 35 • Summary of Experimental Data on Nitrogen Dioxide Effects
Relevant to the Delphi Data ...... .' ........ 65
Table 36 Summary of Experimental Data on Carbon Monoxide Effects
Relevant to the Delphi Data ............... 68
-xiv-
-------
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This study was funded under Contract No, 68-01-1889 from the Environmental
Protection Agency. Assistance in planning program objectives and project
direction was given by Fred Abel, William Watson and John A. Jaksch of the
Environmental Protection Agency's Washington Environmental Research Center,
Resources Analysis Staff.
The Authors are indebted to the staff members of the Air Resources Board.
Appreciation is extended to Robert McMullen and Ben Brewer for their assistance
and advice in statistics, Duane Seibel, John Graham and Susan Poindexter for
their efforts in data processing, Gary Palo and Evan Wong for reviewing the
report and Ruth Sullivan and Betty .Verdina for their help in typing. Special
thanks is extended to Laura Storey Dick who has spent many weekends in typing
and editing this final report.
Grateful acknowledgement is made to John R. Kinosian, Chief of the Technical
Services Division, and Albert H. Bockian, Chief of the Research Section for
valuable advice and guidance.
Special thanks is extended to Drs. John R. Goldsmith and T. Timothy Crocker
for their suggestion in setting up the questionnaire and all 14 panel members
for their participation in this study.
This report is dedicated to the memory of Mr. Dale H. Hutchison who, first
conceived of this project, served as Chief of the Air Resources Board's
research program until his death on August 29, 1973. Widely recognized as a
pioneer in the field of air pollution research, his leadership, wisdom and
humor are missed by all.
-xv-
-------
CONCLUSIONS
The following conclusions are based on the interpretation of data obtained
1n this study.
1. Delphi techniques are appropriate for formulating group judgments in
the air pollution health effects area. In the absence of experimental
data, use of Delphi techniques to obtain a broad and well-informed
opinion from a group of experts' offers an important alternative to air
pollution control agencies for making decisions.
2. According to the best estimates of the panel, the oxidant threshold
level in normal individuals for one hour exposure ranges from 0.05 to 0.20
.ppm. The threshold concentration is lowered among young and old individuals,
and also those with underlying disease. Those with respiratory and chronic
obstructive diseases are most sensitive to the photochemical oxidants",
and the threshold levels for these population groups range from 0 to 0.20
ppm.
The health effects of nitrogen dioxide on different population groups
follow a similar trend as the oxidant. The threshold level of N02 for
one hour exposure in "normals" ranges 0.50-1.90 ppm. The experts suggest
that individuals with severe heart condition are most sensitive to N02,
with a threshold concentration range of 0.20-1.45 ppm. Nitrogen dioxide
also has a profound effect on individuals with respiratory and chronic
obstructive diseases. The threshold level for the latter population group
is 0.30-1.65 ppm. Carbon monoxide exerts its effects mainly in impairing
the oxygen carrying capacity of hemoglobin. Individuals with heart conditions
are therefore most susceptible to its effects. The threshold level of CO
for one hour exposure on-people with heart condition is 10-50 ppm, while
the threshold level in "normals" is 21-72.5 ppm. Individuals with obstructive
disease are also quite sensitive to the CO effects, with a threshold level
of 17.5-52.5 ppm.
3. Based on the dispersion of data in this study, there is a tremendous lack
of experimental information in the field of air pollution health effects.
This is especially true for nitrogen dioxide and carbon monoxide.
-XVI-
-------
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. A similar study using the Delphi approach, but with separate panels for
each pollutant, should be undertaken. This will help to obtain more
accurate and uniform data.
2. In view of the big gap in the air polltuion health effects knowledge,
governmental and other funding agencies should initiate more intensive
research programs to fill in this gap.
3. ' If the dose-response estimates contained in the present report are used
in policy deliberations, close attention should be paid to the degree of
group consensus and panelists' confidence in their own answers.
-XVTl-
-------
I. INTRODUCTION
In recent years much evidence has accumulated v/hich indicates that ozone,
nitrogen dioxide, and carbon monoxide may be hazardous to health. " The
extent of this hazard depends on the toxicity and concentration of the
pollutants, the duration of exposure, and the health status of the individuals
who are exposed. Information for assessing human risk due to air pollution
has been obtained from epidemiological investigations, volunteer studies, and
animal experimentation. Although these studies have yielded valuable data,
the complexity of the problem of air pollution is such that at present the
results do not define dose-response relationships of normal or inordinately
susceptible individuals except for those cases in v/hich the exposures are
above ambient pollutant concentrations. The estimates of the dose-response
relationship in humans must be developed if the public is to be protected
from'possible health effects of air pollution.
In May 1973, the California Air Resources Board responded to a request for
proposal by the Environmental Protection Agency entitled "Human Health Damages
from Mobile Source Air Pollution" and submitted a proposal to estimate "rough
order" physical dose-response relationships for mobile source air pollutants.
The purpose of this project is to determine the dose-response relationships
for carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide and photochemical oxidants. Such a study -
is of importance not only in providing information to protect the public but also
to generate data for estimating the cost benefit of air pollution control-
This proposal was accepted and initiated on July 1, 1973.
A variant of the Delphi techniques was proposed to arrive at a consensus
judgment of a panel of experts on the dose-response relationship for each of
the pollutants. This method improves the quality of judgments of relatively
uncertain issues by experts and allows an improved measure of accuracy and
consistency of judgment. The basic assumption is that the most accurate
assessment of a problem where data is incomplete can be obtained by canvassing
a group of experts and accepting the group consensus.
-1-
-------
II. RESEARCH METHOD
A. General Description
The Delphi techniques used in this study were generated at the RAND
Corporation to provide a method for the systematic aggregation of expert
judgment. These techniques are most useful where insufficient data
exist to derive meaningful policy. In such cases, these techniques are
used to obtain informed judgmental data in the place of actual experimental
data.
Delphi procedures have been applied to a wide range of studies, including
long-range forecasts of economic and technological developments for
industrial decision-making, estimation of costs for new product develop-
ments, estimation of incidence of various disease states in the total
population, and many others. An assessment of Delphi for this type of
application is found in reference 8.
The basic justification for using the Delphi techniques is the elementary
fact that, given a distribution of estimates from a panel of experts, the
error of the mean of those estimates will be less than, or at worst, equal
to the average error of the individual estimates. Depending on the shape
of the distribution, other measures of central tendency such as the median
q
or geometric mean may be more appropriate than the mean.
The Delphi technique involves three features: (1) Anonymity -- estimates
are elicited independently from each of the panelists; (2) Iteration and
controlled feedback-— for questions with large disagreement on the first
round, the panel is informed of the distribution of answers on the first
round and asked to reestimate their answers; and, (3) Statistical group
response -- rather than asking the group to arrive at a single "concensus,"
s
the distribution of estimates on the final round is reported in the form of
the median and the interquartile range. This group response assures that
all panelists' judgments are included in the final estimate, and furnishes
a measure of the degree of agreement.
-2-
-------
A group of 14 physicians and scientists were employed as the expert panel
members for this study. These panel members were queried and their
anonymously submitted answers together with a self-confidence rating of
from 1-10 for each answer were collated, analyzed and returned for a
second iteration. This "feedback" is used by the experts to reestimate answers to
the original questions. Answers from each round were reduced and expressed
in a S-shaped dose-response curve by using the logistic distribution
model. The accuracy of these group responses were evaluated by means of
the data dispersion and self-confidence ratings.
The fourteen panel members are listed below:
Oscar Balchum, M.D.
T. Timothy Crocker, M.D.
Carroll Cross, M.D.
Richard Ehrlich, M.D.
Gustav Freeman, M.D.
Elliot Goldstein, M.D.
Jack Hackney, M.D.
Steve Horvath, Ph.D.
Paul Hoeprich, M.D.
Glen Lillington, M.D.
Homer Peabody, Jr., M.D.
Stanley Rokaw, M.D.
Carl Shy, M.D.
B. Measures of Central Tendency
In a Delphi exercise, each panelist independently estimates some quantity
V
of interest -- in the present case the dose required to produce a given
type of impairment in a given percentage of a specified population. The
data are analogous to independent measures of a quantity by a fallible
instrument, e.g., the set of numbers that would be obtained by repeated
measurements of the length of a table with a yardstick. In the theory of
errors applied to such a case, it is assumed that the variant readings
result from random errors which are distributed normally with zero mean.
Thus the mean of the measurements is the best estimate of the actual
length of the table.
When the distribution of responses is highly skewed, as in the present
study, the mean is usually not the most appropriate measure of central
tendency. The data from the present study are in accord with a large
-3-
-------
number of experimental studies in which the distributions tend to be log-
normal. For a theoretical log-normal process, the population is dis-
tributed normally on the logarithm of the independent variable. Let u
and o be the mean and standard deviation of the underlying normal
distribution on the logarithm. For a distribution with y = 6 and a = 1,
the mean of the original distribution is 1.65 times the median. In the
present study, about 90% of the distributions have means greater than
the median, with factors ranging from 1 to about 3. The hypothesis that
the-data will fit the model of log-normality appears plausible.
The mean(y)of the underlying normal distribution is the logarithm of the
geometric mean (GM) of the original distribution. For this reason, the
geometric mean is generally taken to be the more appropriate measure of
central tendency for a log-normal distribution. Put another way, if the
theory of errors is applied to the underlying (symmetrical) distribution
on the logarithm of the quantity being measured, the best estimate is the
mean of that distribution. The mean of the underlying distribution corres-
ponds to the geometric mean of the original distribution. The relationship
between the. two distributions (for the case y = 0, a = 1) is illustrated
by Figures 1 and 2.
Ul
V)
z
o
a.
in
UJ
o
GEOMETRIC MEAN
.5 1.0 1.5 Z.Q
CONCENTRATION
FIGURE I ORIGINAL DISTRIBUTION
2.5
3.0
-4-
-------
-3 -2 -I 0
LOG CONCENTRATION
FIGURE 2 UNDERLYING NORMAL DISTRIBUTION
With an exact log-normal distribution, the geometric mean is identical with
the median. For applied exercises where the distributions tend to be
ragged, the median has the additional advantage that it is less influenced
by extreme outlying estimates. In experimental studies, the median has
been more accurate than the mean and slightly more accurate than the
m^r, (Unpublished data available on request from N. Dal key)
iilcctn. ^
Therefore, the median is used as the measure of central tendency or "best
estimate." Since the median is an order statistic, an appropriate measure
of dispersion is the interquartile range, i.e., the range around the median
that contains 50% of the responses. This is the measure of dispersion that
has been used in most applied Delphi studies. Experimental studies have
not identified any specific advantages of this statistic (over other forms
12
of feedback, for example).
C. Measures of Validity
Two indices for analysis of validity are used in this study. They are the
second round dispersion of the estimates, and self-rating on the part of the
-5-
-------
panelists. It might be expected a priori that some relationship exists
betv;een the dispersion and accuracy. If the Delphi procedure v/ere a
sampling process -- i.e., if each estimate were a random sample out of
some distribution of estimates, with the true response at the geometric
mean of that distribution -- then the error of the observed geometric
mean would simply be the sampling error. The sampling error is related
to the standard deviation a of the distribution from which the sample
is drawn by the relationship.
S.E. « a/n
10
where n is the number of estimates in the sample. Thus, the greater
a the greater the expected error for a given sample size.
However, the process of estimation in a group is not a random sampling
out of an unbiased distribution (geometric mean = true answer). In
experimental studies with student subjects and general information
questions, the error is about three times the sampling error estimated
from the standard deviation in Figure 6 of reference 9. In their study
using short-range predictions as subject matter, Dal key and Brown found
that the correlation between error and standard deviation was about .67;
however, there is no way to guarantee that the numerical relationship
between error and standard deviation found in that study generalizes to
the present study. The fact that the relationship between error and
V
standard deviation is substantially the same for short-range predictions
and general information questions, as observed by Dal key and Brown, is
some ground for expecting the generalization to hold.
The experiments indicate that the bias increases on the second round.
The amount of convergence, as indicated by the reduction in standard
deviation, between round one and round two is greater than the decrease
in error. Numerically, a least squares approximation gives Log Error = .6a
for round one, and Log Error = 1.2o for round 2. Thus a criterion for
"good" estimates based on the second round distribution must be more
stringent than a criterion based on the first round distribution.
-6-
-------
One convenient reference point for applying dispersion as a criterion of
validity is afforded by the notion of sufficient agreement discussed in the
next section on result feedback. That notion suggests a cut point at an~
initial log error of about .3. Using the relationship Log E = 1.2a, and
rescaling to the original distribution, a criterion of 5 = 1/3 Me! is
arrived at where S is the observed standard deviation, and Md denotes the
median. If the analogy with the short-range prediction data holds, the
expected error for estimates fulfilling this criterion would be less than
33% of the median.
The other internal criterion of validity, namely the self-rating, is
obtained by asking each panelist to rate each of his estimates on a scale
•of 1-10, where 1 means "my answer is a sheer guess" and 10 means "I know
the answer very well." In previous experiments, correlations between
individual self-ratings and individual accuracy is not very high, ranging
around .25. However, the correlation between the average self-rating and
the error of the median was -.62 for the short-range prediction study.
Because of uncertainty in the analogy between experimental results and the
present study, a stringent statistical criterion is used to evaluate the
second round data. Based on this criterion, the second round answers are
divided into three classes: (1) Those that have high standard deviations
(S>l/3Md) and low group self-ratings (R<5), (2) those that have low standard
deviations (S5), and (3) others.*
The first class can be characterized as "not trustworthy," the second class
as "trustworthy," and the others as "doubtful."
The best criterion of validity for the group estimates obtained in this
study is experimental verification. Thus, the finalized data of this
study are subjected to both statistical scrutiny and verification with
available experimental data. •
* The cut point of 5 for the group self-ratings was based on taking the
mid-point of the range.
-7-
-------
D. Criteria for First Round Result Feedback
The basic reason for the iteration step is the expectation that the error
of the median will decrease as a result of reestimation. Experimental
studies ' * have shown that for a majority of the cases, accuracy did
increase between round one and round two. Figure 3 shows the results of
several of these studies concerning the relationship between round one
error, and the change in error between round one and round two. In these
experiments, two rounds of estimates were obtained, the second with
feedback of the medians and quartiles of the first round answers. The
abscissa in Figure 4 is the error of the median for the first round
answers. The ordinate is the change in error between first and second
rounds. Error is defined here as:
E= i"r
Md is the median answer and T the true answer. The vertical bars indicate
that the absolute value of the logarithm is taken. Note that E = 0, if
Md = T. A positive value for the change (E of round 1 minus E of round 2)
indicates the median is more accurate on round 2. As the figure shows,
if the initial error is .3 or less, i.e., In ^ <_.3, .indicating
1*1 1
.75 = y- <_ 1.35, the effect of iteration is to increase the error on the
average. Thus, for questions where the initial error is expected to be
small, reestimation is likely to be counterproductive. Since the initial
error cannot be measured in practice, the first round standard deviation is
the next best indicator. Using the relationship Log E = .6 (for the first
round), Log E <_ .3 corresponds to S <_ .6 Md where S is the observed standard
deviation. This reference point has been used as a definition of "sufficient
agreement" in several previous Delphi studies, where sufficient agreement is
taken to mean that it is inappropriate to have the group reestimate.
For the present study, the decision was made to impose a more stringent
criterion, primarily on the grounds that the degradation on iteration for
modest initial error is small, and some large errors might be greatly reduced.
The criterion selected was to feedback the first round results for those
with interquartile range greater than one-half of the median.
-8-
-------
CHANGE OF GROUP ESTIMATE AS A FUNCTION OF GROUP ERROR
UJ
3:
o
a.
:D
o
cc
u_
o
o
s
<
.70 -r
.60--
.50-
.40--
.30 J
.20-
.10-
0--
-.10--
I
0 .10 - .30 .50 .70 .90 1.25-
GROUP ERROR IN ROUND
FIGURE 3
1.75
2.25
2.50
-------
E. Confidence Limits
In addition to estimating the one hour exposure at which a given percentage
of a given population would experience a given impairment, the panelists
were .asked to estimate the range within which this estimate might fall.
Specifically, they were asked to estimate an upper limit YL defined as
the dosage at which the panelist felt there was no more than a 5% chance
that the dosage would exceed his estimate and a corresponding lower limit Yy.
The medians of the Yj_!s and the Yy's thus represent the group estimates of
the confidence range. Although the quartiles for these limits were computed,
they were not fed back to prevent overloading the panelists with nine
numbers for each dosage estimate. The medians of the best estimate X and
its upper and lower quartiles were fed back.
It is emphasized that the distribution of responses and the estimated range
should not be confused. Figure 4 schematically shows the relationships
involved. The curves in Figure 4 illustrate'the distributions of responses
•for Y|_, X and Y(j, for a given pollutant, a given population type, a given
level of impairment and a given percentage of population. For external
validity tests -- e.g., comparison of the panel estimates with experimental
data, the relevant estimates are the medians of Y[_, X, and Yy. Thus, if
the experimental data falls well within the estimated range, this is a
positive outcome for the study. If the experimental data falls outside
the estimated range, this is a negative outcome. Inspection of the data
indicate that there is a fairly close^relationship between the inter-
quartile ranges on X and the estimated range, with the latter somewhat
wider than the former for oxidant and N02- For CO, Y|_ is generally lower
than Q25 for X, but Y(j is generally lower than 0,75 for X.
^co
° LU
CO
or 2
LU O
CO 1-
DISTRIBUTION
OF YL
DISTRIBUTION
OF X-7
DISTRIBUTION
OF
MEDIANS
— QUARTILES
CONCENTRATION
ILLUSTRATION OF DISTRIBUTIONS ON RANGE ESTIMATES
FIGURE -4-
-10-
-------
F. The Questionnaire
The questionnaire was designed to allow a group of experts to estimate
one hour concentration's of oxidant, nitrogen dioxide, or carbon monoxide
which would induce specific functional abnormalities in population
categories of healthy individuals and of ones with underlying disease
states. Because children, adults, and the old age may differ in their
response to air pollutant exposures, the questionnaire querried the
effect of air pollution in normal members of each age group.
The underlying illnesses selected for evaluation were ones that might
be expected to enhance sensitivity to specific air pollutants. Since
oxidant air contaminants (ozone and nitrogen dioxide) primarily impair
2-3
respiratory function, the experts were asked to estimate the dose-
response relationships for population categories of individuals with
asthma, hay fever-sinusitis, influenza, acute viral.bronchitis, upper
'respiratory infection, acute bacterial pneumonia, mild chronic
obstructive lung disease, severe chronic obstructive lung disease, and
chronic respiratory disease of a noninfectious nature such as pneumo-
coniosis or sarcoidosis. The experts were also asked to estimate
the effect of oxidant and nitrogen dioxide for patients with mild or
severe heart conditions. These categories were included because the
intimate relationship of respiratory to cardiac function suggests that
injury to the former system might reflect itself in an indirect fashion
by decreasing cardiac function.
The deleterious effects of carbon monoxide are due to the formation of
carboxyhemoglobin with a resultant decrease in the oxygen carrying
capacity of the blood. Patients with underlying cardiac disease comprised
the principle population groups of interest as patients with these conditions
may be unusually sensitive to diminshed oxygenation. Estimates of carbon
monoxide toxicity were obtained for the aforementioned respiratory diseases
to determine if in the opinion of the experts these conditions also might
increase sensitivity to carbon monoxide.
-11-
-------
Abnormalities incurred by exposure to each air pollutant were specified
for each population category. In many instances, clinical studies had
shown that exposure to air pollutants might induce or enhance the presence
of the abnormality. With some abnormalities, such as the occurrence of
nasal or sinus drainage in hay fever or sinusitis, this relationship is not
known and therefore it is conceivable that this untoward effect might not
result from pollutant exposure. Dose-response relationships in circum-
stances such as this must be considered problematical, until experimental
data become available.
The abnormalities were arbitrarily divided into categories (discomfort,
disability, and incapacity) in accordance with the probable severity of
the abnormalities for the majority of patients in each population category.
It must be emphasized that these divisions are inexact and that it is likely
that abnormalities such as dyspnea-or headache may be discomforting for
some individuals and disabling for others. The virtue of the scale is
that it allows assessments of dose-response which correlate with clinical
parameters of increasing importance. As an example, for the population
category Acute Bacterial Pneumonia, cough was considered discomfort, a
minimal effect, dyspnea was considered disability, a more, serious conse-
quence, and acute respiratory failure was considered incapacity, a much more
severe medical disturbance.
Since the biologic effect of a pollutant varies with the duration of exposure
at a fixed concentration, a fixed time period of one hour was chosen in order
to minimize this factor and to allow comparison of individual pollutant
effects. Longer exposure periods might have been chosen, but these would
have increased the difficulty in estimating the dose-response relationship
without improving the precision of the estimate.
The population varies significantly in their response to a given pollutant
1-2
exposure independent of the health status of the group. The questionnaire
considered this intrinsic variation by querying the concentration at which
90%, 50%, 10%, and 0% of the population would be expected to manifest the
stated abnormality. In addition to estimating these points, the experts
indicated a range of pollutant concentrations for each dose-response result
-12-
-------
to allov/ limits to be calculated for each estimate. The expert also
estimated the duration in hours of the abnormalities. Self-ratings were
given for each set of. three answers — the range Y|_, Yy, and the best
estimate X.
A complete set of the questionnaire for the study is included in Appendix A,
pages 85-131. Definition of each population group, the normal individual
as well as those with underlying disease, and examples of symptoms expected
under each category of abnormalities (discomfort, disability, and incapacity)
are presented in details in the questionnaire of Appendix A and summarized
in Tables 4-5.
-13-
-------
TABLE 4: Population Categories Which May be Affected,
Definition of Conditions for Incapacity, Disability and Discomfort
Photochemical Oxidant and Nitrogen Dioxide
Pnntil A f i nn
Category
Normal
Children*
Old Age*
Heart Condition,
Mild*
Heart Condition,
Severe*
Hay Fever,
Sinusitis
Influenza
Upper Respi-
ratory
Infection
Asthma
Acute Viral
Bronchitis
Acute Bacterial
Pneumonia
Chronic Respi-
ratory
Diseases*
Mild Chronic
Obstructive
Lung
Disease*
Severe Chronic
Obstructive
Lung Disease*
Definition of Conditions
Incapacity
May precipitate respi-
ratory and cardiac
problems, broncho-
pneumonia
it
Acute respiratory
failure
Pulmonary edema
Angina or myocardial
infarction
Nasal or sinus
drainage and
headache
Superimposed bac-
terial pneumonia
Superimposed bac-
terial infection
Status asthmaticus
Acute respiratory
failure
ii
Pneumonia
Broncho- pneumonia,
cor pulmonale
H
Disability
Headache
n
Bronchitis
Congestive heart
failure
Pulmonary edema
Nasal or sinus
drainage
Dyspnea
Dyspnea, or need
medication and
rest
Asthmatic attack
Onset or worsening
of dyspnea
n
Respiratory
infection
Exacerbation of
bronchitis, fever
and increased sputum
production and chest
pain
n
Discomfort
Eye irritation;
non-productive
coughing, chest
tightness
M
Dyspnea
n
Worsening congestive
heart failure
Nasal or sinus
discomfort
Increased cough
and pleuritic pain
Worsening symptoms
Dyspnea
Worsening of cough
n
Dyspnea
n
n
* Please refer to Appendix A for further explanation.
-14-
-------
TABLE 5: Population Categories Which May be Affected,
Definition of Conditions for Incapacity, Disability and Discomfort
Carbon Monoxide
Population
Category
Normal
Children*
Old Age*
Hay Fever,
Sinusitis
Upper Respiratory
Infection
Asthma
Heart Condition,
Mild*
Heart Condition,
Severe*
Influenza
Acute Viral
Bronchitis
Acute Bacterial
Pneumonia
Chronic Respiratory
Diseases*
Severe Chronic
Obstructive Pul-
monary Disease*
Mild Chronic
Obstructive Pul-
monary Disease*
Definition of Conditions
Incapacity
Coma or convulsions
ii
it
ii
ii
Asthmatic attack,
coma, convulsion
Angina pectoris,
arrythmia, coma or
convulsions
n
Respiratory failure,^
coma, convulsions
n
n
n
n
n
Disability
Throbbing headache,
confusion, irrita-
bility, dizziness
n
n
M
n
II v
Throbbing headache,
confusion, irrita-
bility, dizziness,
and increases in
dyspnea
n
n
n
n
n
n
Throbbing headache,
confusion, irrita-
bility, dizziness
Discomfort
Mild headache,
errors in
cognitive function
M
n
n
ii
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
* Please refer to Appendix A for further explanation.
-15-
-------
Ill, RESULTS
Raw data from the second round are presented in Appendix B. Median estimates,
first and third quartiles, mean and standard deviations for each population
fraction were computed. Using the median estimates to fit into the logistic
distribution model (See pages 46-55), dose-response curves for each abnormality
affecting different fraction of various population categories by each pollutant
were plotted. These dose-response curves for the second round are presented in
Appendix C. The raw data and dose-response curves for the first round are not
included in this report. Limited copies of first round data are available
from the principal investigator upon request.
A summary showing the first round results on the median estimates for discomfort,
disability and incapacity affecting different fraction of various population
categories by each pollutant is given in Tables 6-17. These tables also include
the time duration of each abnormality caused by the pollutant exposure, and the
panelists' self-confidence ratings.
The'first round data were analyzed for group agreement with the feedback criterion
outlined in page 8. Those answers with interquartile range greater than one-half
of the median were fed back to the panel members for reestimation. Using the
feedback criterion, good group agreement was observed in 3B% of the answers for
the photochemical oxidant questionnaire, 10% for carbon monoxide, and 1% for
nitrogen dioxide. On this stringent criterion, two-thirds of the estimates for
oxidant, about 90% of the estimates for CO, and all of the estimates for N02 v/ere
iterated. Estimates with good agreement and not iterated in the second round were
identified with asterisk (*) in Tables 6-17.
The other criterion for validity measurement used in the study was self-confidence
rating. Each panelist was asked to rate each of his estimates on a scale of 1-10,
where 1 meant "the answer is a sheer guess," and 10 meant "the panelist knows the
answer very well." An average self-rating of 5 or higher was used as the cut-
off point for acceptable confidence score. Based on this self-rating system,
panel members put higher confidence in their answers for photochemical oxidant
-16-
-------
and carbon monoxide questionnaires than those for nitrogen dioxide. In about
50% of their answers for both the photochemical oxidants and carbon monoxide
questionnaires, the panel members gave an average self-rating score of 5 or__
higher, while they showed the same degree of confidence in about 25% of their
answers for nitrogen dioxide.
The second round results were summarized in Tables 18-29. These tables include
all new estimates from the panelists as well as those first round data with good
group agreement and not required reiteration. This data represents the improved
and finalized data for the study.
A different criterion was used to evaluate the degree of agreement within the
group on answers in the second round. The estimate is considered to have good
group agreement if its standard deviation is equal to or less -than one-third of
the median value. Based on this criterion, good agreement is observed in 58%,
17% and 8% of answers for the photochemical oxidants, carbon monoxide and
nitrogen dioxide questionnaires, respectively. Comparing to the first round
data, -there is a definite improvement in group agreement in the second round.
It must be noted, however, a different criterion for assessing group agreement
was used in the first round survey.
The improvement of agreement in the second round answers is expected. As it
is mentioned earlier, the bias in the answers increases on the second round
because of the feedback information. Thus a more stringent criterion is used
to assess the trustworthiness of the second round data. By using both the
self-confidence rating in the first round, and the magnitude of the standard
deviations in the second round as the criterion, the second round data is
classified into three categsries: "trustworthy," "doubtful" and "not trust-
worthy." The distribution of answers of the three pollutants in these three
categories are summarized as follows:
Oxidant CO^ N02
Trustworthy 34% 10% ~T%"
Doubtful 26% 8% 7%
Not Trustworthy 40% 82% 92%
-17-
-------
Detailed breakdown of the distribution of answers for each pollutant, popu-
lation group and condition are presented in Tables 30-32. It is interesting
to observe that most of the "trustworthy" answers are found under "discomfort"
abnormality and all population fraction except the 0%. It occurs almost
without exception that "not trustworthy" classification relates to the
threshold levels (0% population affected) of the three pollutants in all
population categories.
-------
TABLE 10: Estimates of Effects on 0% of Population by Population Category,
Nitrogen Dioxide Concentrations (ppm),
First Round Survey
POPULATION CATEGORY
!.'cinnl
Cr.ildron
Old Ai' =
H'-prt Condition, Severe
:•:..• -,1-t '.or.d: tio:i, Hi Id
iljv r».-v';r, .''linusi tin
l:r>i-r IVf !>irutorv Infection
A::' '-I,.-!
V : I'd !'.roii<"Mi I i :i
i!.-. • f-ri'il 7 i:iuro!iia
lr.'"\ M-'-r.r.i
• r'oiiic r\".-j'i i".tory tH.sorifiC
Kilo Ci.ronio Cli^tructiv.? Disease
E..'V'1-o '.liroiiic Obstructive DifiOiioe
INCAPACITY
Yl
1.35
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.75
0.90
1.20
0.901 j
1.00
1.50
0.65
1.00
0.55
X
2.25
2.00
2.25
1.75
2.00
2.50
2.00
2.10
2.00
2.00
2.35
2.25
2.15
1,50
Yu
3.00
3.00
3.00
2.75
3-25
3.25
3.00
3.50
3-35
2.90
3.25
3-10
3.50
2.55
T
R
6.0
4.5
4.0
4.0
5.0
3-5
3.2
3.0
3-0
3.0
3-5
4.0
3.5
3.0
DISABILITY
Yl
1.00
0.75
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.85
0.50
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.75
0.50
0.50
0.45
X
1.8.5
1.25
1.25
1.10
1.15
1.65
1.-10
1.30
1.10
1.00
1.40
1.25
1.65
1.00
Yu
2.50
2.00
2.75
2.10
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.65
2.10
2.00
2.65
2.50
2.90
2.05
T
R
5-0
5.5
4.0
4.0
5-0
4.5
3.5
3.5
3-5
J-.5
4.5
3-5
3.5
3.5
DISCOMFORT
Yl
0.20
LP^20
0.20
0.1-3
0.20
0.25
0.20
0.20
0.4O
0.35
0,20
0.20
0.25
0.15
X | Yu
0.80
0.50
0.55
o.ao
0.75
1.00
1.00
0.75
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.75
1.00
0.55
i.?s
1.50
1.50
1.25
1.65
1.75
2.00
1-75
1.80
1.55
2.00
1.75
1.90
1 .50
T
H
5,5
4.5
5.0
4.0
5-°
5.0
4.5
4.0
4.0
L4.0
4.5
4.5
4.5
3.5
Yl = Lov;or Limit Entimnto (ppm)
X = best Estimate (ppm)
Yu = Uj.ptr Limit Estimate (ppm)
T i Tiinc Duration of the Effects (hour)
R = fir.-lf-Rntin^r. of Pnn^l Member
• = Voluu with Oood Group Agreement (Interquartile Range £ 1/2 of Median)
-------
TABLE 6: Estimates of Effects on 0% of Population by Population Category,
Photochemical Oxidant Concentrations (ppm),
First Round Survey
POPULATION CATEGORY
!.'orr,ai
>".'-, i "Kircri
Old A ,-.••;
•!'•••. rt. r on-'KU on, Sevc-re
H -••.rt .'. or.-iitio-:, Kiid
}'-••; IVvfr, .:.;ir.'.i.-,it.i:;
U: iier Kf>r.: i i"i tory Infection
A • t-i.p:.
Viral Eroji-:!:iU:i
D:.jt 'j.-iol rjinur-.oiiLj
l!,rin':i,:::,
'.'IsfC'iiii: lu.-n;,ir'il,o;-.v i/i.':c;i:;c
Mild ('I :-oi:i>: Cx'iLril':' ivo Pi:^-;i:jc
Severe Chronic Ob:tructive Disease
INCAPACITY
VI
0.22
0.20
0.20
0.20
0 . 20
0.13
0.13
0.13
0.10
0.15
0.15
0 . 20
0.20
0.10
X
0-35
0.30
0.32
o . 30 '
0.35'
0.2?
0.30
0 . 30
0.30
0 . 30
0.50
0.30T
0.32
0.20
Yu
0.50
0.45
0.^2
0.4-0
0.50
0.40
0.^5
0.50
0.50
0.50
evt-2
0.55
0.47
0.35
T
H
6.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
5.0
,5-0
3-0
4.S
5.0
4.5
4.0
4.5
DISABILITY
Yl
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
o.os
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.08
0.05
X
0.20
0.20
0 . 20 '
0.2?
0.23*
0.20
0.20*
0.20'
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20'
0.20
0.15*
Yu
0.40
0.40
0.30
0.40
0.55
0.35
0.35
0.30
0.35
0.40
0.35
0.40
0.35
0.23
'i'
H
5-5
4.0
4.5
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.5
5.0
3-5
4.0
5-5
4.5
5-0
5.0
DISCOMFORT
Yl
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.03
0.00
0.00
0,00
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
X
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10'
0.10'
0.10'
0.10'
0.10
0.10"
0.10
0.10"
Yu
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
"o72~6~
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.23
0.20
T
•
I;
6.0
5-5
5.0
4.5
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
4.5
4.5
5.0
5j_0
5-5
5.0
Yl = Loner Limit istiraate (ppm)
X = Bnst intimate (pen)
Yu = lipr.or Lin it i^tii^t.e (ppm)
T = Tiuie D'.iiT.tio:. of the Effects (hour)
R = Self -Hat inp.v of Panel Member
* = Vf.lus? with '.ooo Group Agreement (Interquartile Kange £1 1/2 of t.edian)
-------
TABLE 7: Estimates of Effects on 10% of Population by Population Category,
Photochemical Oxidant Concentrations (ppm),
First Round Survey
PCPULATIOIl CATEGORY
•:.'0'-.'1ll
Chi i ;!rcn
Oil A; r.
Hc.'.rt I'or'.'.it ion, Kcv/ere
:i~ari Condition, Mild
!'.•••: Kov'cr, .r.jr.i!.~itic
i.': r.r-r K°sr>ivatory infection
/•. r * : r-n
V:r-il K."O!i".!iitis
Br. - 1 n ri; 1 1 Fi i o '. ii'ion i 'i
;..-)„„,..„
'"i ro:iic Kos'.>i;-,':lorv Di .S'-a.v.e
i-.il-."' (ii;onic Obstructive Disease
S •; vi-- re f'-hror.ic Obstructive D.IGCOSC
INCAPACITY
YI
0.55
0.55
0.42
0.40
0.47
0.40
0.40
0.40
0.40
0.42
0.40
0 . 40
0.40
D . 30
X 1
0.75*
0.75"
0.67
0.60*
0.80
0.60
0.60
0.65
0 . 60 *
0.75'
0.60
0.60
0.80
0.50
Yu
1.10
1.00
0.93
0.80
1.05
0-95
0.90
0.80
0.95
1.00
1.00
1.05
1.05
0.70
T
19
24
24
24
24
14
24
18
24
24
24
24
24
24
H
6.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.5
5-0
5-0
3-5
3.5
4.5
4.0
4.0
5.0
DISABILITY
Yl
0.40
^55
0.30
0.40
0.55
0.30
O.$0
0.23
0.27
0.30
0.50
0.35
0.25
0.15
X
0.50A
0.50*
0.42
0.55
0.60
0.50
0.45
0.40
0.40'
0.45
0.40"
0.50
0.45
0.40
Yu
0.80
0.80
0.70
0.80
0.90
0.70
0.75
0.60
0.65
0.70
0.70
O.SO
0.80
0.55
T
7
7
12
18
12
11
11
9
12
12
9
24
24
24
R
6.0
4.5
4.0
4.0
4.0
5.0
I 5-0
5.0
4.0
4-5
5-5
4.0
[_ 5-0
5-5
DISCOMFORT
Yl
0.14
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.15
0.15
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.10
0.10
X
0.50
0.3?
0.30'
0.40
0.40'
0.30
0.35'
0.30
0.30
0.30
0.33'
0.50
0.30
0.25
Yu
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.55
0.50
0.45
0.50
0 . 50
0.50
0.45
0.50
0.45
0.50
0.45
T
ii
5
6
24
6
7
9
0
10
11
6
8
O
^
7
R
6.0
5-5
5.0
4.5
4.5
5.0
5.0
5.0
3-5
~-j
5.0
5.0
5.0
5-0
I
ro
o
Yl = Lower Limit Estimate (ppm)
X = B'.at Kslin.-jU; (ppm)
Yu = Upper Lin.it Eotiraato (pon)
T = Time Duration of the Effects (hour)
R = Sell-Ratings of Panel Member
* = Value with Good Group Agreement (Interquartile Range •£ 1/2 of Median)
-------
TABLE 8: Estimates of Effects on 50% of Population by Population Category,
Photochemical Oxidant Concentrations (ppm)
First Round Survey
POPULATION CATEGORY
Nornal
Children
Old Are
!'e-irt Condition, Cc'Vure
He-'-rt ror/Jition, Mild
!:•:••/ Fever. Sinusitis
Voror F.er.pir.itory Infection
Arliima
Virnl !'.ro!,':!iitiG
'r-iclc-rj.'il ri:o>irr,onia
infi uf.-n:1..-!
O':runic K?GpLrri lory- Pi.oe'ice •
Hil'l '^hronio Obstructive Disease
Severe Chronic Obstructive Disease
1MCAPACIT1'
Yl
3.75
3.75
3.80
0.65
p. 75
3-55
0.70
3.60
3 . 60
3.65
3.60
3.80
3.75
3.50
X
1.10*
3.95
1.00'
3.95
1.00
0.80
0.90
3 . 90
0.85'
3.92''
3.85
1.05
1.10
0.65
Yu
1.40
1.30
1.30
1.35
1.50
1.10
1.15
1.20
1.20
T.30
1.10
1.40
1.50
0.80
T
13
24
24
24
24
12
24
18
24
24
24
24
24
24
H
5.5
4.0
4.0
4.5
4.0
5.0
-5.0
5-0
5.0
4.5
5.0
5.0
4.0
5.0
DISABILITY
Yl
0.50
0.50
0.47
0.50
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.40
0.35
0.40
0.45
0.50
0.35
X
0.80
0.70"
0.75"
0.75
0.75
0.70
0.65
0.70
0.60
0.60
0.60
0.70'
0.80-
0.55
Yu
1.15
1.15
1.00
1.05
1.15
0.95
0.85
0.95
0.80
0.85
0.75
1.00
1.20
0.75
T
7
7
12
18
14
11
11
9
12
12
9
24
24
24
R
5-5
4.5
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.5
5.0
5.0
4- . 5
4.0
5.0
4.0
5-0
5.0
DISCOMFORT
Yl
0.35
L0.35
0.30-
0.35
0.35
0.25
0.30
0.30
0.20
0.25
0.25
0.30
0.30
0.20
X
0.60*
0.60'
0.50
0.50
0.50*
0.40
0.50
0.45
0.40
0.45
0.40
0.50'
0.50
0.40
Yu
0.80
0.75
0.65
0.70
0.65
0.65
0.70
0.65
0.75
0.70
o . 70
0.50
0.75
0.55
T
4
4
' 6
24
6
n
(
9 '
6
10
11
6
O
10
10
R
6.0
4.0
4.5
4.5
4.5
5.0
5.0
5.0
— f~\
s • u'
4.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
r-o
*—*
i
i'l - Lower Limit Estimate (ppra)
X = Best Estimate (ppm)
Yu = Upper Limit Estimate (ppm)
T = Time Duration of the E*ffeets (hour)
R = Sclf-Katings of Panel Member
* = Value with Gcod Group Agreement (Interquartile Range £. 1/2 of Median)
-------
TABLE 9: Estimates of'Effects on 90% of Population by Population Category,
Photochemical Oxidant Concentrations (ppm),
First Round Survey
POPULATION CATEGORY
Horrnal
Children
Old Are
/
He~srl Cor.i'i t. i on, Severe v
Heart Condition, Mild
i'r.v Fever, .Sinusitis
i.': '.'.-r RecT.'iratory Infection
Ar • i .!:.a
Vir: 1 !M-0!,'i'.iUs
Bacterial Pneumonia
In;'! 'ien",;i
•"•'ironic i-.emir; l.ory In S'.HM'
Mi]'.i Chronic Ol:.-l ructi vo Uiac'-'i;;o
£<:vcro Chronic Ch.struc t LVP Dir-ouse
INCAPACITY
Yl
1.15
1.10
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.75
0.80
0.30
0.95
0.90
o.ao
1.00
1.00
O.GO
X
1 . 50 '
1.40'"
1.4O*
1.20
1.45*
1.00
1.20
1.10
1.25
1.20*
1.00*
1.45*
1.35
1.00
Yu
1 . 80
1.60
1.65
1.85
2.00
1.30
1.4-5
1.50
1.75
1.65
1.40
1.80
1.85
1.35
T
20
24
24
24
24
12
24
18
"24
24
36
24
24
24
R
4.0
3-5
5.0
4.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
5.0
5.0
5-0
5.0
5.0
4.5
5.5
DISABILITY
Yl
0.80
0.70
0.70
0.80
0.75
0.55
0.80
0.70
0.55
0 . 50
0.60
0.75
0.60
0.45
X
1.00*
1.00*
1.00*
1.00*
1.15*
0.80
0.95
0.95
0.80*
0.80*
0.80
1.05
0.95'
0.60
Yu
1 . 40
1.20
1.40
1.40
• 1.65
1.10
1.10
1.20
1.05
1.05
1.00
1.40
1.35
0.80
T
7
7
12
18
24
11
9
9
12
12
9
24
24
24
R
4.5
4.0
5-0
3 . 5
4.0
4.5
5-0
6-0
4.5
4.5
5-5
5-0
5-0
6-0
DISCOMFORT
Yl
0.45
0.55
0.40
0.50
0.45
O.JO
0.50
0.52
0 . 30
0.30
0.40
0.40
0.40
0.25
X
0 . 80 '
0.75'
0.70'
0.75'
0.70'
0.55
0.70"
0.55
0 . 60 '
0.55'
0.60
0.60'
0.60'
0.45
Yu
1.00
1.00
0.95
1.00
0.90
0.75
0.95
0.85
0.85
0.85
0.80
0.85
0.95
0.65
T
4
4
6
24
6
0
o
9
6
10
11
6
9
10
10
p.
6.0
4.5
5.0
4.0
/< c
~ • J
5.5
r- (\
i f --
5. ~
5-0
— . ^
5.0
c r\
5.0
? • ?
po
i
i'l = Lov:cr Limit Estimate (ppm)
X = Best Estimate (ppm)
Yu = Upper Limit Estimate (pran)
T = Tine Duration of the Effects (hour)
R = Sell-Ratings of Panel I-iomber
* = Value with Good Group Agreement (Interquartile Range •£ 1/2 of Median)
-------
TABLE 10: Estimates of Effects on OX of Population by Population Category,
Nitrogen Dioxide Concentrations (ppm),
First Round Survey
POPULATION CATEGORY
i.'ornal
Children
Gi "i A re
H?rrt Coi.'dition, Severe
Hv-jrt Condi tio:i, Kild
HUY Fever, .Sinusitis
. , p _ . , T - -i
Art' r.-'i
Vi !• ,1 !'rO!'-":n 1 i:s
i3;i.-tT-ri-'il F'i:oi::r;onia
l:.M:i--i.::p
• :.• o>ii<~ i\":T i r'.Lory I.'i :-:o?ise
:',i]d '"i.rorii': Ciiftruc live Diur-.rit.c
Sjv-ru •-•iM'oiiic OhHtructive D.ifiOcioe
INCAPACITY
Yl
1.35
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.75
0.90
1.20
0.901
1.00
1.50
0.65
1.00
0.55
X
2.25
2.00
2.25
1-75
2.00
2.50
2.00
2.10
2.00
2.00
2.35
2.25
£.15
1 . .50
Yu
3.00
3.00
3.00
2.75
3-25
3-25
3.00
3 • 50
5.35
2.90
•3.25
3.10
3.50
2.55
T
K
6.0
4.5
4-.0
4.0
5.0
-3-5
_
3.0
3.0
3-5
4-.0
3.5
3.0
DISABILITY
Yl
1.00
0.75
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.85
0.50
0.45
O.'lS
0.45
0.75
0 . 50
0.50
0.45
X
1.85
1.25
1.25
1.10
1.15
1.65
1.10
1.30
1.10
1.00
1.40
1.25
1.65
1.00
Yu
2.50
2.00
2.75
2.10
^2.50
2.50
2.50
2.65
2.10
2.00
2.65
2.50
2.90
2.05
T
R
5-0
3.5
4.0
4.0
5-0
4.5
5-5
3-5
3 - 5
4.5
4.5
3.5
3.5
3-5
DISCOMFORT
Yl
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.20
0.20
0.10
0.35
0.20
0.20
0.25
0.15
X
0.80
0-50
0.55
0.80
0.75
1.00
1.00
0.75
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.75
1.00
0.55
Yu
1.75
1.SO
1.50
1.25
1.65
1-75
2. CO
1.73
1 . ao
1.55
2.00
1.75
1.90
1.50
T
R
5.5
4.5
-.0
4.0
5.0
5-0
^.3
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.5
Lr' 7
±•5
3-5
i'l = Lov.-or Limit Est.imoto (ppn)
X = Bent Estimate (ppn)
Yu = Upper Limit Estimate (ppra)
T !-. Tii.ie Lmrytion oi the Effects (hour)
R = Golf-Hat inc." of Pon"! Hcmb'.T
* = Value with Good Group Agreement (.Interquartile Range £ 1/2 of Median)
-------
TABLE 11: Estimates of Effects on 10% of Population by Population Category
Nitrogen Dioxide Concentrations (ppm),
First Round Survey
POPULATIOii CATEGORY
>-orf,pl
C:.-:i:ir'-i
OM /..-<.•
•k-iirt Cor.iiit io'i , i'»jvere
!!<•• -;-t '. unditicn , Mild
i::;;.- Kovc-r, ''iii'ssitis
L'rv.--:r Kospiratory Infection
Art- n".
Vir-al i'l C!ir:,ili.i
£.-,.-'. -i-l ,1 r:,cu,i;cr,ia '
Ii.i 1 Vif-i-: .T
..
•_ 1 . „ G. ! 1 ' Kr' . . ' •! 1 • ; 1. G 1 tf L) ) . if Ji . i(J
i'.i.lii Chromic (.,r,r 1 rue- 1 i vc- Dj .•••.•:i;- c
£f:vc'io f'1'i-onic Obstructive Djf.:o;ti;c
INCAPACITY
Yl
2.45
2.10
2.10
2.00
2.00
3.00
2.50
2.30
2.55
1.80
2 . 50
2.55
2.05
1 . 80
X
4.00
3.80
4.00
3-75
5-85
4.25
3-25
4.00
3-75
•") '.-1 1-
3.75
3.65
4.00"
5-50
Yu
5-55
4.90
5.50
5.00
5.10
5-25
4.50
5.00
4.95
4.75
5.00
4.95
5.25
4.75
T
12
12
24
24
24
12
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
R
5.5
5.0
4.5
3.5
5-0-
3.0
4.5
4.0
4.0
4.5
3.5
4.0
4.0
4.0
DISABILITY
Yl
1.80
1.15
1.00
1.50
1.75
2.00
1.45
1.50
1.30
1.45
1.G5
1.40
1.50
1.40
X
3.00
2 . 50
3-00
2.70
3.00
3.00
2.65
3.00 .
2.25
2.05
2.75
2.50
2.85
2.40
Yu
4.50
3-75
4.55
4.15
4.25
4.35
4.00
4.40
5.80
3.00
4.20
4.00
4.60
4.00
T
G
G
18
24
24
8
12
11
12
12
12
24
21
21
R
4.5
3.0
4.5
3.5
5.0
3.0
3.0
3-5
4.5
4.5
3-0
4.0
4.0
4.0
DISCOl-JFORT
Yl
1.00
0.75
0.50
0.85
0.50
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.90
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
X
2.00
1.75
1-75
2.00
1-75
2.50
2.20
2.00
1.80
1.70
2.25
2.00
2.00
1.60
Yu
5.00
3.00
3.00
3-25
5.23
3-75
3.25
3.00
3.10
2.90
3-75
5.00
3- ^5
2.80
T
5
4
7
12
7
6
6
5
10
10
n
!
8
6
10
R
6.0
5.0
5.0
4.0
5.0
2 C.
5-0
3.5
4.0
5-5
5. 5
4.0
4.0
4.0
Yl = Lever Limit Estimate
X - B..-iit Lali^ite C?P!:i)
Yu = Uj.ner Limit Estimate
T = Tii:,o Duration of the Effects (hour )
R = Self -Pat ings of Panel Momber
*' = Value with Good Group Agreement ( Ii.tei-quartile Mange ^
/2 of Median)
-------
TABLE 12: Estimates of Effects on 505! of Population by Population Category,
Nitrogen Dioxide Concentrations (ppm),
First Round Survey
POPULATION CATEGORY
Kornal
Children
Old Ace
Hor-rt rendition, .'jcvere
Hesrt Condition, l-iild
ii'iV Fever, '''iiiusitiG
L'r.r/oi' Resnirotory Infection
Vir&l hroncMi tjs
H- ~. i.eri;il i-'n cursor: i a
T:'.n-.ieni:--
•Jhronjo K-v^/ir.'.tory Dif.cn.oe
!!ii'i Chronic Obstructive Disease
"Sovc-fe '.'hro.'-i': Obstructive DiutjauB
INCAPACITY
Yl
3.90
2.80
3.75
3-30
3.00
2.30
3.135
3-50
3.50
3.50
3.55
3.15
3.30
3.00
X
5.75
5.00
5.00
5-00
4-. 65
4.75
4.75
5.00
4.75
4.35
4.75
4. HO
5.00
4.50
Yu
8.00
6.15
7.10
5-90
6.30
6.30
5.50
7-70
5-75
5-25
5-95
5.75
6.20
5-75
T
12
12
24
24
24
12
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
R
5.5
5.0
4.5
3-5
5.0.
3.0
4.5
3-5
4.0
4-0
3-5
4.0
4.0
4.0
DISABILITY
Yl
3-30
2.20
2.00
2.45
2.00
2.75
2.00
2.20
1-75
1 . 50
2.20
1.50
2.15
1.65
X
4.50
3.30
4.10
3-85
4.35
4.50
3.00
4.25 .
3.00
2.70
3-50
2.80
4.00
3.00
Yu
5.25
4.50
h5-75
Jb25_.
5-65
5.55
4.75
5-30
5.00
4.10
5.00
5.00
5-35
4.75
T
6
6
18
24
24
8
12
11
12
12
12
24
21
21
R
5.0
3-5
4.5
5.5
5.0
3.0
3-5
3-5
4.5
4.0
3-5
4.0
4.0
4.0
DISCOi-iFORT
Yl
1.90
1.50
1.00
1.75
1.50
2.30
1.75
1.75
1.10
1.25
1.75
1.00
1.50
1.25
X
3.75
2-75
2.50
2.70
2.75
5-25
3.00
2.50
2.00
2.10
2.75
2.25
2.25
2.00
Yu
4.25
5-50
3-25
3-50
3-50
4.10
4.25
4.25
3-25
5.55
4.00
3.25
3-75
3.35
T
3
4
7
12
10
6
7
5
10
10
8
8
S
10
R
.6.0
5.0
5.5
4.0
5.5
3.5
5-0
3.5
4.0
s -
^' . >
3.5
4.5
4.0
4.0
Yl = Lov.-tr Limit Estimate (ppn)
X = Host -istiiLate (ppn)
Yu = Upper Liiuit Estimate (pp-1)
T = 'i'inc Duration of tiie Effects (hour)
R = S
-------
TABLE 13: Estimates of Effects on 90% of Population by Population Category,
Nitrogen Dioxide Concentrations (ppm),
First Round Survey
POPULATION CATEGORY
Normal
Ch: idren
Cl-1 Are
H-rurt Condition, .'ic-vore
Kc-i'rt Condition, Mild
!!•• v Fovnr, oinMiiitiG
Ui t cr hosniratcrv Infection
Asthrf
Vii-'l Pro:. -hi (.is
E.~,i; t eri:i] Pur umoiiia
InfluonL'.n
Chrcriir K< ::nii :> lory IHnuaao
jiijd Chronic: Obstructive Disease
Severe- Chromic Obstructive Dicease
I
¥i
5.00
3-50
4.00
4.50
4.25
4.75
4.50
5.25
4.75
5.25
4.50
4.75
4.00
4.00
X
6.25
6.25
6.00
6.50
6.50
5-75
6.00
6.50
6.00
6.50
5-75
6.00
6.00
5-50
,'CAPACITY
Yu
9.00
7-50
9-00
7-50
7-75
7.00
7.50
8.00
7-25
7-25
8.00
7.50
8.50
7-25
T
12
12
24
24
24 .
12
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
R
5-5
5.0
4.5
4.0
5-5
4.0
5.0
4.0
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.0
4.0
4.0
DISABILITY
Yl
4.00
3.00
2.50
2.75
3-50
3.00
2.75
4.50
3.00
1.85
2.50
2.50
2.60
2.15
X
5-50
5.00
5.00
5-00
5.00
5.00
4.50
5.00
4.00
3.00
4.50
4.25
5.00
3-85
Yu
7.00
6.75
6.25
6.00
5-25
6.75
5-50
6.00
5-50
4.95
6.25
5-50
6.50
5.55
T
6
6
18
24
24
8
12
11
12
12
12
24
21
21
R
5.0
5-0
4.0
3-5
5-0
4.5
4.5
4.0
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.0
4.0
4.0
DISCOMFORT
Yl
3.50
2.30
2.00
2.25
2 . 50
2.80
2.30
2 . SO
2.30
1.45
2.05
1.75
1.75
1 . 60
X
4.75
3.50
3 • 50
5.60
4.25
4.75
4.00
5.00
3.25
3.00
5-50
3.00
2.75
2.75
Yu
5-75
4.25
4.75
4.75
5.00
S.60
5.00
4.30
4.10
4 . 50
4.75
4.70
4.90
4.40
T
3
il
7
21
10
6
7
5
10
10
10
8
8
10
H
6.5
5-5
5-0
3-5
5.0
5.0
5.0
4.0
4.5
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
ro
01
Yl - Lower Limit Estimate (ppra) '
X = Best E^rirnate (ppm)
Yu = Uurer Linn I Estimate (ppm)
T = Tin-.e Duration of the Ef i'ccts (hour)
R = Sulf-Hj.tincs of Panel Member
* =. Value with Good Group Agreement (Interquartile Range ^ 1/2 of Media!))
-------
TABLE 14: Estimates of Effects on 0% of Population by Population Category,
Carbon Monoxide Concentrations (pprn),
First Round Survey
POPULATION CATEGORY
;.:orrr;al
Chilirer.
Cl-i Are v
H':-:!rf Cor.'lition, .Severe
!lf. =.-rt ''.ci'.ailion, Mid
::-•-• r'fV'.-r, 0 ifi ur--.it in
U::rcr Rffbiratory Infection
Art!.:-:---.
Vi ml Eroi'.-rii tie
ir.' <:ic:ri'il Pur'Ji.orii.-i
l:.f!uMi :••."•
'";.r'o::io Ki-sui r/.tory Di^ocj.'.r
!.il°: Ci.roiiic C'L:,truc tiv;- Dice-rise
Sfvero ''llronic Gbatruci i vo Oirif.'ise
INCAPACITY
VI
60.0
GO.O
50.0
'(•0.0
45.0
CO.O
CO.O
56.0
33.0
GO.O
60.0
60.0
55-0
39-0
X
80.0
90.0
90.0
55.0
75.0
90.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
95.0
100.0
90.0
100.0
so.o
Yu
130.0
14-5.0
14-5.0
70.0
100.0
135.0
145.0
145.0
1 5? . 5
1JO.O
152.5
152.5
145.0
126.0
T
R
5.0
5-5
5.0
4.5
5.0
4.5
4.5
3.0
5-0
4.5
4.5
4.5
5.0
5.0
DISABILITY
Yl
40.0
40.0
45.0
25-0
55.0
40.0
40.0
35-0
35-0
30.0
25-0
30.0
30.0
20.0
X
60.0
60.0
60.0
40.0
55-0
60.0
55.0
55-0
55.0
50.0
50.0
55.0
55.0
35-0
Yu
80.0
.90.0
90.0
60.0
90.0
80. 0
80,0
' 80.0
80.0
80.0
80.0
80.0
80.0
52.5
T
R
5-5
5-5
4.5
4.0
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
5.0
4.0
4.5
4.0
4.5
3-5
DISCOMFORT
Yl
20. D
14.5
16.0
10.0
22.0
20.0
17.5
10.0
16.5
10.0
10.0
15.0
10.0
7.5
X
35-0
28.0
52.5
20.0
55-5
35.0
52-5
2?.5
50.0
21.0
22 . 5
28 . 5
20.0
18.5
Yu
55.0
45.0
65-0
42 . 5
60.0
35-0
55-0
45.0
57.5
43.5
4-5.0
35.0
40.0
30.0
T
R
5.0
6.0
/. C:
T • ^
3-5
4.0
5.0
•- r\
^ • U
5.0
5-0
4.0
5.0
4.0
4.0
3-3
Yl = Lower Limit Estimate (ppm)
X = Bc-Gl Estimate (ppn)
i'u = Uj per Limit Estimate (ppm)
T = Titr.e Duration of the Effects (hour)
R = Self-Ratings of Panel Member
* = Value with Good Group Agreement (Interquartile Kange^1/2 of Median)
-------
TABLE 15: Estimates of Effects on 10% of Population by Population Category,
Carbon Monoxide Concentrations (ppm),
First Round Survey
POPULATION CATEGORY
Ho real
C':.i Iciron
Old Arc-
i'Uort Con ''tit. ion., Severe
Ht-irt (-ojYiit ion, Mild
'.I'v Fever, fiiriiir.i tir.
V-rer Ret=r.irntory Infection
A.-flT.n
Vir-;l Eror.chitis
E.-c tori ill Pneumonia
Ir.f 1 ur:i ••.-•>
'.'i'.ronic i-.':r,i'irp-tory Dj.v.fti'o.:
rU]'i ! I'.i'oii'l': '/!:;. tructi v- nir;c-pp.'.'.o
S'.-voro Chronic Obijtnic'.i ve Di nc.-ine
INCAPACITY
Yl
•160.0
155-0
150.0
55-0
120.0
160.0
150.0
150.0
150.0
130.0
1SO.O
150.0
14-5.0
97-0
X
200.0
190.0
177-5
100.0
155.0
190.0
180.0
182.5
175.0
160.0
184.0
175-0
175.0
14-5.0
Yu
222 . 5
227-!;
200.0
140.0
195-0
232.5
230.0
.235.0
220.0
220.0
252.5
212..1;
210. C
198.0
T
12
12
12
24
12
12
12
12
12
12
18
12
12
24-
R
5-5
5.0
5-5
4.5
5-0
' 4.o
4.0
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.0
4-5
5.0
5.0
DISABILITY
Yl
100.0
80.0
90.0
54.0
90.0
90.0
90.0
90.0
75.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
90.0
50.0
X
132.5
125.0
125.0
80.0
120.0
155.0
135.0
130.0
120.0*
110.0
125-0
120.0
130.0
100.0
Yu
177-5
176.0
172.5
120.0
160.0
170.0
180.0
130.0
170.0
145.0
170.0
160.0
175-0
130.0
T
7
7
7
16
12
7
7
7
7
9
9
11
11
13
R
5-5
5-0
4-. 5
5-0
4.5
5.5
3-5
4.0
4.0
4.0
3-5
/I..O
4.5
4-.5
DISCOMFORT
Yl
55.0
44.0
49.0
33.0
45.0
55.0
55-0
40.0
40.0
32.5
40.0
59.0
30.0
25.0
X
75.0
75.0
75-0
60.0
85.0
75-0
75-0
65.0
70.0
60.0
70.0
75.0
60.0
4-0.0
Yu
100.0
95.0
106.0
82.0
111. 0
100.0
100.0
90. G
95-0
82.0
100.0
100.0
90.0
65-0
T
-•>
j
4
5
5
3
4
LL
4
5
5
6
6
6
R
o.O
3-0
4.0
4. 5
4.. 5
5- 5
4.0
4.5
4.5
4.0
5-5
3-5
4.5
; c
~ * >
I
ro
CO
Yl = Lower Limit Estimate
X = Beat Kstimnte (ppni)
Yu = Upper Limit Estimate (ppm)
T = Tira-j Duration of the Effects (hour)
R = Srlf-Ratines of Pnnel Member
' = Value with Good Group Agreement(Interquartile Range^ 1/2 of Median)
-------
TABLE 16: Estimates of Effects on 50% of Population by Population Category,
Carbon Monoxide Concentrations (ppm),
First Round Survey
FOFULATIOtl CATEGORY
Korrr.al
Ci-il-Jren
01 J Are
iif-srt Condition, Severe
K%irt Condition, Kilci
::••-•/ fever, .Sinur.itic
Unrr-r Rcr.i'i ratorv Infection
Viral Bior.cliitis
Br:ct eri-il. FnoiiiiiO:ii--\
Ir-:'l urin::;!
J'lii'C.'iif: hr-r.i.i r.ilorv Di.'-'-nr.r:
l-.iir. ('Iironi '; GimLruclivo Dir.t-.'mc
Spvero Chronic Obstructive Ui.';o:j:;c
INCAPACITY
Yl
210.0
192.5
180.0
104.0
155-0
185.0
190.0
190.0
187-5
170.0
190.0
190.0
190.0
14-5.0
X
260.0
235-0
210.0
161.0
180.0
250.0
220.0
235.0
220.0
210.0
220.0
250.0
2:50.0
180.0
Yu
287-5
272.5
285.0
205.0
205-0
300.0
270.0
295.0
247 • 5
225.0
270.0
265.0
2G5.0
200.0
T
18
12
12
24
12
12
12
17
12
18
18
18
18
24-
R
6.5
6.0
6-0
5-0
G-0
5-5
5.0
5-5
5-5
5-5
4-. 5
5.0
5.0
6.0
DISABILITY
Yl
140.0
125.0
125-0
77-5
100.0
125-0
122-5
125.0
125-5
110.0
122.5
125.0
155-0
84.5
X
170.0
165.0
165.0
122.5
1 52 . r
180.0
175- ('
17?. 5
155-0
155.0
175.0
160.0
170.0
150.0
Yu
200.0
200.0
190.0
175-0
172.';
200.0
200.0
200.0
190.0
200.0
200.0
19<5.:T
197-:"
188.0
T -
7
7
7
22
12
7
7
10
7
9
9
11
11
13
K
6.0
5-5
5-0
5-5
5.0
5-0
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
5.0
5-5
DISCOI-LTORT
Yl
87-5
73.5
71.0
57-5
65-0
85 - 5
72.5
65-0
65.0
55-0
60.0
62.5
50.0
45.0
X
120.0
112.5
102.5
80.0
102.5
120.0
110.0
100.0
95.0
90.0
90.0
100.0
85-0
70.0
Yu
155-0
158.5
140.0
105.0
140.0
145.0
155.0
130.0
124. 5
120.0
150.0
152.5
127.5
97-5
T
3
3
4
5
6
3
ii
c.
s
4
c.
J
5
6
6
6
R
6.5
5.0
3.5
5-5
4.5
'~ • 5
5.0
5.0
^•' • '"— '
4.0
4.5
-.0
4. 5
5.0
Yl = Lo'.;er Limit, Estimate (ppm)
X = Beat Estiiriat-; (ppm)
Yu = Upper Liir.it Estimate (ppiri)
T. = Time Duration of the EiTecta (hour)
R = Self-Rc!ti:i(:s of Panel Mei'.iber
* = Value with flood Group Agreement l i nlurquj'.rti I e Hanj^e S-T'l/P of h
-------
TABLE 17: Estimates of Effects on 90" of Population by Population Category,
Carbon Monoxide Concentrations (ppm),
First Round Survey
POPULATION CATEGORY
riorr.al
Chi.' drop.
01 -j Are
He?.rt Condition, .Severe
Hcirt Condition, Mild
::"•/ Fever, oiMisitis
T-rrer F.r.oi>-: ratorv Infection
r "~ t " ^
Vii-:,l PI-OIK:'. itis
r;-cteriul Fne-unoriia
In:": \i? :..".. n
Chroni c Hc-nin'.or.y Dir:r-a:;e
'lild Chronic Obstructive Di^ense
Severe Chronic Obstructive Di cease
INCAPACITY
Yl
235.0
225.0
215.0
130.0
135.0
215.0
210.0
227-5
210.0
210.0
210.0
195.0
200.0
170.0
X
275.0
275-0
250.0
1720
200.0
260.0
250.0
2 02 . 5
237.5
225-0
225.0
215.0
245 . 0
225-0
Yu
325-0
325.0
300.0
215.0
235-0
300.0
285.0
322.5
272.5
245.0
260.0
282.5
282.5
295-0
T
16
12
12
25
12
12
12
16
12
18
18
18
18
24
R
7.0
7.0
6.5
5-0
' 6.0
6.5
5-5
5-5
5-5
5-5
5.0
5.0
5.0
16.0
DISABILITY
Yl
160.0
165.0
150.0
100.0
140.0
150.0
140.0
160.0
140.0
140.0
140.0
141.5
140.0
104.0
X
190.0
190.0
175-0
150.0
165.0
175-0
175-0
187.5
170.0
170.0
175-0
166.0
170.0
170.0
Yu
235-0
235.0
200.0
200.0
190.0
215.0
230.0
200.0
200.0
200.0
200.0
200.0
215.0
185.0
T
10
10
10
24
12
10
10
8
10
9
9
11
11
18
R
7.0
7-0
5.0
5-5
5.0
5-5
4.5
4.0
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
5.0
5-5
DISCOMFORT
Yl
114.0
98
9S.O
75.0
91.0
114.0
109.0
97.5
95.0
84.5
87-5
95-5
87.5
65-0
X
155.0
125. c
127. J
95.0
129.0
135-6
140.0
130.6
115.0
112.;:
120.0
137-S
120.0
100.0
Yu
155. C
152. 1
1 57 . :
120. C
170. c
153.J
18- . c
1 57 • '-
141 .C
'U'-O.C
148.5
162.5
152.;
135- C
T
4
4
5
5
6
5
5
5
5
5
K
6
6
"o
R
5.5 •
5-5
5-0
5.5
c, r\
s * *-•
5.0
4 .0
4.0
~r * S
4-5
4.0
4.5
5 .0
5- 5
Yl = Lo-.;er Limit Estimate (ppra)
X = B?r,t Estin.ate (ppm)
Yu = Upper Limit Estimate (ppm)
T = V::.ie Duration of the Kl'fccts ( hour)
R = Sclf-Ratinre of Pnnel Member
* = Value witli Good Group Agreement (Interquartile Range ^1
of Median)
-------
TABLE 18: Estimates of Effects on 0% of Population by Population Category,
Photochemical Oxidant Concentrations (ppm),
Second Round Survey
POPULATION CATEGORY
I.'oraal
Children
Old i-.se
Hc-rrt Condition, Severe
H?.-.t-t Condition, liild
:•••/ rover. ."ii:ni::it is
U: ; or Rnsi.'irotory Infection
A • • ; '• • r -"•
Vir:-l i:.ro::niij . ti r.
Bacterial 1'; i c " n;: on i £i
Is !'l ::.-;::••.•,
Gr.ror.ir. P.r-.-oii-^ lory i)ioec..';e
Fii]
-------
TABLE 19: Estimates of Effects on 10% of Population by Population Category,
Photochemical Oxidant Concentrations (ppm),
Second Round Survey
POPULATION CATEGORY
:;oraai '
Children
Old Arc
Kesrt C civii t IOM , Severe
He-art Condition, Mild
':•;.•.- Fovar, Sinusitis
Utter Respiratory Infection
•....;•....
Vir--:l bronchitis
E-icttrial PneuriOisia
Ir.fl'if-rv, a
(.'•:. ror.ic lu^uir.-itory Disease
"iVJi Chronic Obstructive Dise;iE=c
Spvcre Chromic Obstructive Dii-.e&se
INCAPACITY
Yl
0.40
0.47
0.40
0.40
0.4?
0.40
0.40
0.40
n,4f>
0.42
0.40
0,40
0.50
0.30
X
0.77*
0,70
0.70*
0.60*
0.80*
0.60*
0.62X
0.60*
0-ftn*
_H.21_
0.65*:
0.62
0.80*
0.50*
Yu
1.00
1,00
1.00
0.80
1.05
0.93
0.92
0.80
n_pn_
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.02
0.75
T
19
24
24
24
24
22
36
24
?<-
24 _
24
48
48
48
H
DISABILITY
Yl
0.25
0,30
0.30
0.30
0,30
0.25
0..30
0.20
n.?7
0.30
0.30
0.27
0..30
0.20
X
0.41*
0.50*
0.55*
0.52*
0.60*
0.50*
0.50*
0,40*
0.40-x
..0.50*
0.40*
0.47
0.50
0.40*
Yu
0.67
0.70
0.85
0.80
0.88
0.75
0.72
0.65
n,
-------
TABLE 20: Estimates of Effects on 50% of Population by Population Category,
Photochemical Oxidant Concentrations (ppm),
Second Round Survey
POPULATION CATEGORY
Nomal
Children
0] o Arc
ii'-nrt Cor.dition, Severe
Heoi-t Corviition, Mild
.'by Fever, .SiMinitis
'.'I n-r Her.Tii rntory Jnfoction
A"ti.r.,T
Vii •-•! hro;io:ii Li:,
B.-. _-'.eri=jl Pneumonia
Ir.fluf.-r.-.n
Chronic Kui.-i'irn tor;/ Difimme
Mild Chronic Obstructive Disonse
£'••.' c-.-c Ohi-oriic Obstructive Disease
I!
Yl
0.80
0.67
0.60
0.60
0.65
0.60
0.62
0.60
0.60
0.65
0.60
0.65
0,72
0.45
X
1.02*
1.00*
1.00*
n.95*
1.00*
0.85*
0.92*
O.Sn
0,85*
0.92
0.82*
0.93*
l.OOx
0.75*
.'CAPACITY
Yu
1.40
1.25
1,25
1.27
1.40
1.25
1.22
2.20
1.20
1.30
1.15
1.20
1.38
0.98
T
24
24
24
A8
24
22
36
24
24
24
30
48
48
48
I!
DISABILITY
Yl
0.50
0.47
0.40_
0.50
0.42
0.40
0.40
0.40
0.38
0.40
0.40
0.45
0.50
0.35
X
0.80*
0.70*
0.72*
0.77*
0.80*
0.65*
0.67*
o.c->o*
0.55*
0.60*
0.60*
0.70
0.80*
0.55*
Yu
1.05
1.00
1.02
1.05
1.20
0.95
0.95
0.95
0.80
0.90
0.80
1.00
1.15
0.77
T
10
12
_2.4 _
24
20
21
22
17
12
17
10
24
24
30
R
DISCOMFORT
Yl
0.30
0.25
0.30
0.27
0.35
0.20
0.27
0.23
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.30
0.30
0.15
X
0.50*
0.50*
0.50*
0.50*
0.50
' 0.40*
0.50*
0.40
0.40*
0.40
0.40*
0.50
0.52*
0.32
Yu
0.70
0.70
0.75
O.SO
0.65
0.60
0.70
_fLL60
0.60
0.67
0.60
0.60
0.80
0.50
T
4
6
12
24
6
12
16
11
12
12
12
8
14
18
R
CO
UJ
I
Yl = Lov;er Limit Estimate (pp;a)
X = B>?st Estimate (ppm)
Yu - Ur;.er Limit Si-.tim.-it'.- (ppm)
T = Tine Duration of the Effects (hour)
K = Sclf-H.-itincs of Pnnol Mc.-nbor
* = Value witii Good Group Agreement (M.-mei.-ird D.i vi.at.ion •
1/3 °1'
-------
TABLE 21: Estimates of Effects on 90% of Population by Population Category,
Photochemical Oxidant Concentrations (ppm),
Second Round Survey
POPULATION CATEGORY
Normal
Chi) Ore n
Old Arc
H-v.-irt Cor.riition, Severe
Heart Condition, Mild
Hrv Fever, Sinusitis
Urrer Kc-sniratery Infection
Art '• p-'1
V:ril Bronchi ti 5
B'-'^rial I-r.cuir.mici
Jnfiv.pn::;,
1
- •:>}». <•"-; -. rc-nic Obstructive Disease
.-°v-.-re i-liroiiie Obstruct! vo DiMusa
INCAPACITY
Yl
1.15
1.10
1.00
1.00
1,00
0.80
0.80
0.80
0.80
0.90
0.80
1.00
0.88
0.60
X
1.50
1.40
1.40
1.20
1.45
1.00*
1.20*
1 , 00*
1.20*
1.20
1.00
1.45*
1.20*
1.00*
Yu
1.80
1.60
1.65
1.85
2.00
1.38
1.60
1.40
,1.60
1.65
1.40
1.80
1.60
m?
T
20
24
24
24
24
24
33
24
36
24
36
24
48
_iB_
H
DISABILITY
Yl
0.80
0.70
0.70
0.80
0.75
0.60
0.60
0.60
0.55
0.50
0.60
0.70
0.62
0.45
X
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00*
1.15*
o.so*
0.95*
0.60*
0.80*
0.80
0.80*
1.05*
.1.00*
0.75*
Yu
1.40
1.20
1.40
1.40
1.65
1.05
1.20
1.13
1.05
1.05
1.02
1.35
1.30
O.Q5
T
7
7
12
18
24
21
21
18
12
12
20
24
24
10
, H
•
DISCOMFORT
Yl
0.45
0.50
0.40
0.50
0.45
0.30
0.50
0.35
0.32
0.27
0.35
0.40
0.40
O.?T
X
0.80*
0.75*
0.70
0.75
Q.7C1
0.50*
0.70*
0.60*
0.60*
0.55
0.60*
0.60
0.60
n.4?»
Yu
1.00
1.00
0.95
l.CO
O.QO
0.75
0.95
O.SO
0.82
0.85
0.80
0.85
0.95
O.M
rp
4
4
6
24
6
12
9
11
12
g
12
9
1 J.
?1
K
Yl = Lover Limit Estimate (ppm)
X = Best Estimate (?pn)
Yu = Upper Limit Estimate (ppm)
T = Tirr.c.- Deration of the Effects (hour)
R = Self-Ratim-s of Panel Mn.-nber
' = Value with Good Group Ap;reement (Standard biviatio:i •£ 1/3 of Median)
-------
TABLE 22: Estimates of Effects on 0% of Population by Population Category,
Nitrogen Dioxide Concentrations (ppm),
Second Round Survey
POPULATION CATEGORY
i.'onrial
Children
Old Ape
r>^rt Condition, Severe
He-iirt (.o.-.dition, Mild
!;•.•' F'ivrr, .'iinur.itin
Ur.'i-or Kec pirn tor;/ Infnction
/ i - •,•-.
Viral Bronchitis
5~ct./ri-.il F.-icumonia
l.".f luer.'/a
'.'i.:o:nc Krr ni r.-< lory Disease
J'ild Chronic O'.j'jt. ructiv,- Di;seor.c
?.«:vor<; Chronic Obstructive Disjeaue
INCAPACITY
Yl
1.50
1.55
1.50
1.35
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.35
1.50
1.35
1.35
1.45
1.55
1.00
X
2.50
2.50
2.25
1.90
2.35
2.50
2.25
2.00
2.50^
2.10
2.45"
2.60
2.35
1.75*
Yu
3.50
3.45
3.30
2.85
3.50
3.60
3.40
3.50
3.50
3.40
3.45
4.00
3.50
3.00
T
H
Yl
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.60
1.00
1.10
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.80
1.00
1.05
1.00
0.65
DISABILITY
X
1.60
1.60
1.50
1.55
1.60
1.70
1.50
1.60
1.50*
1.50*
1.75
1.75
1.60
1.30*
Yu
2.60
2.65
2.50
2.40
2.85
2.75
2.55
2.70
2.60
2.55
2.80
2.95
2.90
2.45
T
R
PISCO.MFOST
Yl
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.20
0.45
0.50
0.50
0.65
0.70
0.50
0.60
0.50
0.45
0.30
X
1.00
1.05
1.20
0.75
1.00
1.15
1.00
1 . 10
1.25
1.00
1.30
1.00
1.00
0.75
Yu
1.90
l.SO'
2.35
1.45
1.85
2.00
2.00
1.75
2.00
1.S5
2.00
1.90
1.70
1.65
T
R
I
OJ
en
Yl = Lower Limit Ks>l.imate (ppm)
X = Best Seriate (ppm)
Yu = Upr.er Limit Entirnate (ppm)
T = Time Duration of the Effects (hour)
H = St-lf-h.utings of Punel Hcn.bor
' = Value with Good Group Agreement (Standard Diviation *-z '1/3 of Median)
-------
TABLE 23: Estimates of Effects on 10% of Population by Population Category,
Nitrogen Dioxide Concentrations (ppm),
Second Round Survey
POPULATION CATEGORY
liornal
Cv.iidrcn
01 H Are
Heart Condition, Severe
Heort Condition^ iiild
•ir-v r'ov»r, Sinucitis
U-. ] er Respiratory Infection
Afrti.na
Viral Bronchitis
Er.-terial Fne:- norda
Ir:fIuc-:.:-.a
C:\rcnic rr:.^;;ir; '"Oi-v Dj s'.'U.se
Iiild Chronic 0!) \tructivn Disease
Severe i'.hronic Obstructive Disease
INCAPACITY
Yl
3.25
3.00
3.00
2.35
2.85
2.95
2.75
2.60
3.00
3.00
2.60
2.90
2.35
1.85
X
4.70
4.25
3.85
3.45
3.85
3.50
3.50
4.00
3.75
4.25
3.50
3.75
3.50
3.00
Yu
8.00
6.00
5.45
4.70
5.00
4.85
4.85
5.00
5.00
5.25
4.90
5.00
4.80
4.25
T
19
20
24
30
24
19
24
24
24
24
27
36
30
33
R
DISABILITY
Yl
2.90
2.20
2.00
1.85
2.15
2.00
1.80
1.85
1.85
1.50
2.00
2.50
1.85
1.40
X
3.75
3.35
3.00
2.90
3.10
3.00
3.00*
3.15
3.00*
2.75
3.00
3.30
2.90
2.35
Yu
5.00
4.75
4.00
4.10
4.25
4.25
4.20
4.10
4.00
4.00
4.25
4,20
4.30
3.65
T
10
10
19
22
19
12
16
11
16
16
17
24
24
24
R
DISCOMFORT
Yl
1.60
1.50
1.50
1.20
1.20
1.50
1.45
1.25
1.15
1.00
1.25
1.15
1.00
0.65
X
2.50
2.20
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.40
2.10
2.45
2.10*
1.85
2.10
2.00
1.60
1.50
Yu
3.25
3.05
3.00
2.95
3.20
3.50
3.20
3.50
3.20
2.85
3.25
3.10
3.15
2.50
T
9
S
8
16
9
9
9
8
8
11
11
11
11
12
R
I
OJ
Yl = Lower Lir.it ..utimate (com)
X = Best Estin-.at • (pp.T.)
Yu = Upper Limit !•. timate (ppm)
T = TiaiP IX: ration .if the Effpcts (hour)
R = Self-Ratings o; Po_nel M"mbor .
* = Value with Gooi. "iroup Agreement (Standard Diviation
. 1/3 of Median)
-------
TABLE 24: Estimates of Effects on 50% of Population by Population Category,
Nitrogen Dioxide Concentrations (ppm),
Second Round Survey
POPULATION CATEGORY
i'orr.al
Children
Old Are
K«-nrt Condition, Severe
He-'-.rt Condition, Mild
ii-.v Fever, .Sinusitis
"Joi.c-r Respiratory Infection
Anh.r.a
Virol Bronchitis
B r. c t -3 r in 1 F; i cumon i n
Iiif l-.ien^T
Chronic h.>r,:>ir;itory Dir.eu.'ie
-''-Lie! C-hronic Obstructive Di.v.:rj..-:o
3
-------
TABLE 25: Estimates of Effects on 90% of Population by Population Category,
Nitrogen Dioxide Concentrations (ppm),
Second Round Survey
POP'JLATlGil CATEGORY
Nornal
Children
01 <• A-e
i;<5--irt Condition, Severe
Hvurt Condition, Mild
'.:(••; i'cvor, .Siir.iuit.ic;
'.inror Kf.'srd rfitory Infection
.'•.• r,-.,r.-:
Viral Bronchitis
B".~t«riul Fnou:noni?»
lr.;ilif-l • -,;.-,
Ci.i'or.ic KCKriintorv Dir-e;i:,e
riii'l Chrc'ii': UuGlruct Lve IHuPasc
Scv.'.r^ Chronic Ohctructiv; Disease
INCAPACITY
U
6.00
5.50
4.50
5.00
5.00
4.50
4.25
4.00
4.75
4.35
4.00
4.50
4.00
3-25
X
10.00
8.00
8.00
8.00
8.00
7.00
5.75
6.00
7.00
6.50
6.00
6.00
6.00
4.50
iu
13.50
11.50
10.00
10.00
10.50
10.00
9.50
8.50
10.00
9.00
9.50
9.50
9.00
•6.40
T
19
24
24
31'
24
22
24
24
24
32
33
36
30
33
H
DISABILITY
n
4.00
3.70
3.05
3.40
4.00
3.75
3.50
3.50
4.00
3.50
3.25
4.00
3.00
2.50
X
6.00
5.50
5.00
5.50
6.00
5.50
4.75
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
4.80
3.60
Xu
10.00
9.50
8.00
7.50
8.50
8,00
8.00
8.00
8.00
7.50
S.OO
7.00
6.10
5.05
T
10
11
22
22
?2
14
16
14
16
16
20
24
24
24
H
DISCOMFORT
U
3.50
3.20
3.00
2.40
3.00
2.85
2.70
3.00
3.00
3.00
2.50
2.65
2.60
2.00
X
4.90
4.65
4.00
3.50
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
3,25
3.70
3.55
3.00*
Yu
6.00
5.65
4.85
4.50
5.00
5.15
5.40
5.00
5.50
4.S5
5.00
4.80
4.60
4.00
T
8
10
11
17
10
9
11
9
11
12
13
12
12
12
K
CO
CJ
il = Lower Lirr.it K.stimate (pp™)
X. = best Bstiniato (ppis)
Yu = Hi ;icr Lir.it E:. t-iinnte (Ppni)
T' = Tir.e Duration of the Efj'ects (hour)
H = Self-Ratings of Panel l-'.npnber
* = Value with Good (Jroup Agreement( otam'ard liivia'-ion ^ 1/3 of K.edian)
-------
TABLE 26: Estimates of Effects on 0% of Population by Population Category,
Carbon Monoxide Concentrations (ppm),
Second Round Survey
FOrij'LATIOI! CATEGORY
'•'orr.al.
Ci.i liirrn
01-1 ,,,-e
!:.~".:rt C'on'ii ' ion , Sevrre
Ho-.Tt C.or.di tjo."., Mild
!'•••/ J'L-vc-r, ;;jri-,;r.iti5
'J: , «ri- F.f-f.rir.-itorv Infection
/•cti'.r.w
Vii1 .1. iToric.".it j u
E-.ci:e-ri:il. Pneumonia
]• nuor.:..-.
'.'i.i uiii'1 i.''.- .'rir.': lory biMvirif
!.:1'l (;>; -'jiiio Oi.'sLriic1. ivo L'iocure
Severe !'. roiiic Cbr.t rue Ki.vo D.i,r.e£ioQ
INCAPACITY
Yl
80.0
72.5
65.0
40.0
50.0
67.5
65.5
67.5
67.5
62.5
62.5
65.0
65.0
60.0
X
110.0
100.0
100.0
60.0*
77.5
97.5
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
97.5
100.0
100.0
92.5*
Yu
150.0
150.0
142.5
90.0
112.5
135.0
142.5
140.0
145.0
142.5
141.0
140.0
142.5
120.0
T
R
DISABILITY
Yl
40.0
40.0
40.0
30.0
32.5
30.0
40.0
40.0
40.0
35.0
35.0
32.5
32.5
30.0
X
80.0
60.0
62.5
45.0
50.0
60.0
60.0
60.0
65.0
60.0
60.0
59.0
60.0 '
60.0
Yu
109.0
100.0
96.5
72.5
85.0
100.0
90.0
97.5
100.0
90.0
85.0
85.0
85.0
82.5
T
H
DISCOMrOHT
Yl
21.0
20.0
17.5
12.5
10.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
15.0
20.0
19.5
20.0
17.5
X
45.0
35.0
32.5
25.0
30.0
40.0
40.0
37.5
40.0
40.0
35.0
39.5
40.0
32.5
Yu
72.5
55.0
60.0
47.5
50.0
60.0
62.5
60.0
60.0
52.5
60.0
59,5
60.0
52.5
<-p
R
JOT Mi:.it E:,tiir:nt.p (ppm)
il Jvi-.tii:;f.ti; (ppm)
e.-r Limit t'stiiriiite (ppm)
-.e l-.iratio.r-> of the Kfi'c'cts (hour)
R = Self-Katings of Panel Mrnibor
* = Value with Gt-od Group A;;ro<.-ment (Standard Diviation 2= 1/3 of l-iedian)
-------
TABLE 27: Estimates of Effects on 10% of Population by Population Category,
Carbon Monoxide Concentrations (ppm),
Second Round Survey
POPULATICi: CATEGORY
I.'ornnl
Children
0"H A!-«:
liesrt Co.viitio:!, Severe
Heart Ocnr.i tier. . I'ild
H:-v F'.-vor, Si inir.it is
Vi-rcr Ropfiv.'.! lory Infection
A L" t I.:'"1
V i r ~> 1 H r o : s c : i i t i c
5r-tf ri-il r-ncu^ori-K
7 ' • •" 1 -L; r r. • • n
• ''''';r.i~ K'-. -riivtof" ui .••.'.•-<:.;•_•
f'v.Vi Chronic C'.'LtruDtivc Disease
S"vor" '.'l-.''O;.i^ ' b.'-i.n.iol.i v
-------
TABLE 28: Estimates of Effects on 50% of Population by Population Category,
Carbon Monoxide Concentrations (ppm),
Second Round Survey
POHILATiOi! CATEGORY
i.'or:r,nl
VniViron
*.
Oi-i .-.re
HHV. t-. •''orvii tior. , Severe
Kc..rl svr.Ji \ ioi , !-'.ild
!:• y l-vvor, Sj-.unitio
Vvror Rc-Pniratory Infection
• .... . .
V i r •'. 1 ":? r c : . •.: h i t i a
£-••7 vC-r--r>3 F:i<;':r.onia
i!in>i--r.:-3
Ci-rr r.i '; K* r"li'.'*,urv Uv:-ofif;o
'!;'!•.] Chronic ObEtrur.tivo Diccnoe
£ f: v:: i'o • "hrouic 'J'uslructivt; Uifififinc
HiCAPAClTY
Yl
200.0
190.0
170.0
135.0
155.0
195.0
185.0
195. Oj
160.0C
165.0
180.0
160.0
165.0
140.0
X
262.5
235,0
210.0
180. 0>
190.0
250.0
225.0
225.0
215.0
200.0
215.0
200.0
205.0
180.0
Yu
300.0
300.0
300.0
225.0
230.0
300.0
300.0
287.5
300.0
2AO.O
300.0
250.0
255.0
200.0
T
20
20
22
24
12
22
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
R
DISABILITY
n
150.0
125.0
125.0
90.0
120.0
125.0
127.5
127.5
122.5
110.0
127.5
112.5
122.5
100.0
X
182.5
165,0
167.5
122.5
150.0
165.0
170.0
165.0
160.0
150.0
167.5
155.0
155.0
140.0*
Yu
2.30.0
200.0
200.0
166.0
185.0
200.0
195.0
200.0
200.0
200,0
200.0
197.5
197.5
180.0
T
12
10
12
17
17
12
12
12
15
15
15
13
15
19
K
DISOOrJ'OHT
Yl
85.0
80.0
71.0
40.0
80.0
80.0
75.0
80.0
80 . 0
65.0
80.0
60.0
60.0
X
120.0*
105,0*
103. 5>
65.0
110. n*
115.0'
105.0
110. 0*
100.0
100.0*
105.0
95.0*
100.0
90.0
Yu
155.0
137.5
139.0
100.0
i/.O.O
140.0
137.5
136.5
140.0
123.0
131.0
120.0
125.0
115.0
T
7
3
10
11
il
11
12
11
11
10
12
12
12
12
ij
Yl = Lo--or Limit Ectimatc (ppm)
X = Beet Kstimate (p?m)
Yu = Ur.per Limit Estimate (ppra)
T = Tine Duration of the Effects(hour)
F. = Self-RotiiiE? of i rir.el l-'.omber
* = Valuo with Good G/oup Agreement (Standard Deviation ^1/J of Median;
-------
TABLE 29: Estimates of Effects on 90% of Population by Population Category,
Carbon Monoxide Concentrations (ppm),
Second Round Survey
r- GPU i ATI 01 i c ATS; OR Y
: !o!T".P,1
C:-iV:r«-M
C": •; - '""
::':?..'•- ''ovii-i '. iO'i, Go-erf
H- •. i-t .Vo.-,4iT.ion, I'.-IU
;:. „ j.Vvjr, '•! i :'!Ur.i lie
'.'::<•>)• ;'•;.';:•: rat or", .'.'it'ecticn
:'. t !•' •-..">
Vir-.\ Hi on^-ii1' is*
S::~ terial J;!ie'.:"'.orA3
7- , ,
C '.!'.-'_ --.v- r:c~:'i: --toi s E'i ;,?;•.'.(•
i'.ild C.;ir'j!-ic C'-octr; •. tiv° i1i:ji-.l.';c
Sevore Chronic Obsti'. ctive Disease
INCAPACITY
Yl
250.0
205.0
200.0
145.0
175.0
235.0
200.0
200.0
200.0
192.5
205.0
200.0
200.0
167,5
X
300.0
300.0
300. Oj
190.0
215.0
300.0
300.0
300. 0-
300.0
215.0
300.0
225.0
275.0
205.0
Yu
400.0
375.0
375.0
245.0
255.0
375.0
355.0
350.0
350.0
275.0
355.0
300.0
325.0
262.5
T
20
20
22
24
22
22
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
K
DISABILITY
Yl
177.5
165.0
165.0
109.0
142.5
172.5
160.0
152.5
150.0
150.0
155.0
152.5
155.0
121.0
X
225.0
200.0
200.0
150.0
170.0
200.0
200.0
197.5
200.0
180.0
200.. 0
1SO.O
190.0
170.0
iu
290.0
245.0
250.0
200.0
200.0
257.5
252.5
242.5
250.0
205.0
250.0
200.0
225.0
200.0
T
12
12
14
21
16
12
14
15
13
15
15
15
15
20
k
DJSCC.i--.rCKT
Yl
105.0
93.0
91.0
65.0
92.5
114.0
104.0
97.5
97.5
90.0
100.0
97.5
102.5
70.0
X
140.0*
120.0
130. c>
90.0
119. C*
135.0
UO.O
130.0
131.0
120. C"
135.0*
'/u
170.0
I/. 5.0
1.65.0
120.0
160.0
153.5
167.5
150.0
157.0
140.0
160.0
125. C4] 159.5
UC.O>
100.0
160.0
140.0
T
7
6
10
1 1_
11
6
6
6
11
10
12
i O
±.i-
12
!.£
i.
•
1
-p»
ro
Yl = Lo.ver Limit E.sti M'.C (ppm)
X = fior.t Kf;tiir.3te (ppm)
Yu = ''r.r.er Linrlt Estisn; '. o (ppra)
T = Tir.e Duration of t. - Effects (hour )
R = Self -Entires of Pa; -I K^mbor
* •-: Veiuo '.'itii Good Gro (- Aj;rc'_~ent (Standard biviation
1/3 of
-------
TABLE 30: Classification of the Trustworthiness of the Second Round Answers
Pertaining to the Health Effects of the Photochemical Oxidants on
Normal Individuals and Those With Different Underlying Illness
FOl'ULATlOiJ CATEGORY
i-'or-nal
Children
Old Are
i'ip^rt Condition, Severe
!!?->.rt <;or.rii tion, Mild
:'=.Y rover, Sinusitis
Ui i-or Krr.'-.niry tory Inl'cci.iop.
Astii".;,
Virc.l Bro.-.r.hitis
3r.otfri.-iL Pneumonia
Influen-;,
Chronic Rc-mir-itorv Disna.-.R
Hilrf Chionic Cbf;l:i-u;i i ve Disease
Severe C'lirop.ic Obstructive Diccnce
INCAPACITY
0*
NT
MT
D
NT
D
NT
NT
NT
NT
NT
NT
D
NT
NT
105*;
T
D
D
D
D
D
T
T
D
MT
D
NT
D
T
502
T
D
D
D
D
T
T
NT
T
MT
T
D
T
902
HT
NT
NT
NT
' NT
D
n'
T
T
NT
NT
T
D
T
WflflRJ
0%
MT
NT
D
NT
'NT
NT
NT
NT
NT
NT
NT
NT
NT
NT
10#
T
D
D
D
T
T
T
D
n
T
NT
NT
T
,ITY
50*
T
D
D
D
D
D
T
T
D
n
T
NT
T
T
902
NT-
NT
NT
D
D
D
T
T
D
IJT
T
T
T
T
DISCOMFORT
0#
MT
NT
NT
NT
NT
NT
MT
T
NT
MT
NT
NT
NT
MT
102
T
T
T
D
D
T
T
D
n
NT
IT1
T
T
502
T1
i
D
D
D
NT
T
T
MT
T
fiT
T
T
NT
902
T.
D
NT
T
T
T
T
NT
T
\-rr-.
NT
T
T a Trustworthy
D = Doubtful
!IT = Not Trustworthy
-------
TABLE 31: Classification of the Trustworthiness of the Second Round Answers
Pertaining to the Health Effects of Carbon Monoxide on Normal
Individuals and Those With Different Underlying Illness
POPULATION CATEGOKY
i.'onr.sl
"Kil'iren
Ul.'l A/-<:
iiesrt Cotvlit.ion, Severe
Heart Condition, Mild
ilav .'•'over, SinuM tin
Upr/i-r Ko.'iiurM.ory Infection
Astiii!.-!
Vir.-l. Bronc'ii tie
Ha,.- 1 f. r j ,-:! Pr.r-unicnia
Infliii'iv.:,
-vj-tcc-i-r--!.^"-.':! i ]•:. tory Hi rr-:ii;n
i-iilci.Ciii-onir: Obr, irunU vc I>i cunue
.''.avere ( iiro.-iic Obiiti ucl.i vi< Diefnue
INCAPACITY
0#
UT
NT
NT
D
NT
NT
NT
NT
NT
NT
NT
NT
NT
T
10&
N'T
NT
NT
NT
NT
NT
NT
NT
NT
NT
NT
NT
NT
NT
5O»»
MT
NT
HI
T
NT
NT
MT
NT
NT
NT
MT
NT ..
NT
NT
9<$
NT
NT
NT
NT
MT
NT
NT
NT
MT
NT
NT
f'FT1
NT
NT
DISABILITY
0%
MT
NT
NT
NT
NT
NT
NT
NT
NT
NT
!•?!
NT
MT
NT
10$
I IT '
MT
NT
NT
NT
NT
NT
NT
NT
NT
NT
Jsl.
NT
NT -
5O£
NT
MT
NT
MT
MT
NT
NT
NT
NT
NT
NT
NT
NT
D
9<$
NT
NT
MT
NT
NT
MT
MT
NT
NT
NT
NT
NT-
NT
NT
DISCOMFORT
0&
NT
MT
!-.'T
NT
MT
NT
NT
NT
MT
NT
NT
NT
NT
NT
1056
XT
T
D
NT
D
T
T
T
T
D
NT
D
T
T
5C#
T
D
NT
D
T
N'T
T
N'T
D
NT
p
NT
NT
90S
T
NT
T
NT '
T
N'T
D
NT
^'JT
D
D
n
T
MT
T = Trustworthy
D = Doubtful
NT = Not Trustworthy
-------
TABLE 32: Classification of the Trustworthiness of the Second Round Answers
Pertaining to the Health Effects of Nitrogen Dioxide on Normal
Individuals and Those With Different Underlying Illness
POPULATION CATEGORY
i.'oi-rnl
Children
Ul-.! Ars
K^-irt Coiiilition, Severe
i : c- ••. r t Condition , Jiild
Hnv I-'ever, Sinu:-.itir>
I'r'por Hi. siiirnLory Infert.ion
AsUi.ii.'i
Vir;il Bronchitis
:: ric t •••rtf. 1 i::i'.-u;i:on i a
Inf lunn^a
Chronic Kt.'jrii'nt-orv Disease
r'-ilii .Chr'^fli ~ Qbt;t.ru':tivo Dico,-u;c
Severn f. hror. !<; Cbotruciiv? Disoaee
INCAPACITY
a/o
NT
NT
JJT
NT
NT
NT
MT
NT
NT
NT
D
NT
NT
D
Wff,
NT
NT
NT
NT
NT
NT
NT
NT
NT
NT
NT
NT
MT
NT
5O£
NT
NT
h'T
NT
NT
MT
NT
NT
NT
NT
MT
MT
NT
MT
9U6
NT
NT
NT
NT
• MT
NT
MT
NT
NT
NT
NT
NT
NT
NT
DISABILITY
0/0
NT
NT
HT
NT
• NT
NT
NT
NT
D
D
NT
NT
NT
D
10&
MT
NT
HT
NT
NT
NT
D
NT
D
NT
NT
NT
NT
MT
5O6
NT
MT
MT
NT
HT
NT
NT
. NT
D
' NT
NT
NT
MT
HT
90£
•JiT
NT
KJT
MT
NT
NT
HT
HT
MT
NT
NT
MT
MT
MT
DISCaiFORT
0*
NT
NT
NT
MT
NT
NT
NT
.NT
NT
NT
KT
NT
MT
io;&
NT
MT
MT
NT
NT
NT
NT
HT
D
NT
MT
MT
i-r
NT | MT
50#
MT
K
NT
MT
NT
VI-
NT
T
NT
D
NT
D
MT
N'T
MT
9C)J
.„ KT ._
:,T
|.;m
NT
MT
NT-
NT
NT
NT
;S i
»!T
;1 i
D
T n Trustworthy
D = Doubtful
NT = Hot Trustworthy
-------
IV. DISCUSSION
A. General Comments
Due to the voluminous quantity of data generated from this study, dis-
cussions in this report will be mostly restricted to the finalized results
which include data obtained in the second round and those from the first
round that do not require reiteration.
Based on the criterion given under the method section, the second round
estimates are classified as "trustworthy," "doubtful" and "not trustworthy."
Judging by the numbers of "trustworthy" and "not trustworthy" answers, it
might seem that the Delphi approach does not work out very well in this
study. However, if one examines closely the distribution of answers for
each .pollutant, population group and condition, and compares these answers
with available experimental data, one will conclude that Delphi procedures
are appropriate for arriving at group estimates. As it is discussed below
under Section C, the Delphi data are generally comparable with available
experimental data. The limited number of "trustworthy" answers in the
finalized results, especially in the area pertaining to the health effects
of nitrogen dioxide and carbon monoxide, is really a reflection of the lack
of actual data to form a basis for the panelists to come to a better group .
agreement, rather than a deficiency of the Delphi techniques. This comment,
however, should be taken with a certain amount of caution. Although the
panel members participating in the study are considered experts in the
field of air pollution health effects, their degree of knowledge and philos-
ophy very. These differences may explain for some of the variability of
answers in areas where there is a lack of experimental data.
In spite of the fact that the dispersion is wide on a large portion of the
estimates, these estimates turn out to have a reasonable form of consistency.
The panelists were asked to estimate both the concentrations at which 10%
and 90% of a given population would experience a given impairment, and the
concentrations at which they were 5% and 90% certain that a given fraction
of the population would experience the impairment. The two estimates are
-46-
-------
not logically dependent; however, because of the lack of information in
this task situation, it seems unlikely that a sharp discrimination could
be made between the two types of estimates. This would suggest that a
fair amount of redundancy exists in the data if the panelists are being
consistent. One simple hypothesis to test the existence of redundancy
is that the 10% and 90% estimates on population are similar to the 5%
and 95% estimates of certainty for the 50% estimate on population.
The hypothesis was tested on a subset of the data, namely, the 27 cases
Normal, Children, and Severe Heart Condition, for the three levels of
impairment and the three pollutants. In each of the 27 cases, the 5% and
• 95% confidence limits for the 50% population estimate, and the 10% and 90%
population estimates were divided by the 50% population estimate to T.ake
the various cases comparable—in effect, normalizing the Y|_, Yy, -X^g and
Xgg estimates to the XSQ estimates.
Table 33 displays the mean normalized Y|_ and Yy estimates and the mean
normalized Xjg and Xgg estimates for the 27 cases. The similarity between
mean Y^ and Xjg and Yy and Xgg is striking. Inspection of individual esti-
mate indicates that in many-of the 27 cases, the Y|_ and Xjg or Yy and Xgg
are in fact, identical. In summary, the answers put forth by the panelists,
especially in area where no experimental data exist, are not just random
estimates.
TABLE 33: Comparison of Mean for Lower and Upper Limits (Y[_ and Yy)
for 50% Population with the Mean Best Estimates for 10%
and 90% Population (Xig and Xgg, All Normalized to X5g)
YL .67 .70 X1Q
Yu 1.29 1.25 X9Q
B. Dose-Response Models
A glance at the data suggests that the dose-response relationship expressed
in the median estimates is S-shaped. A number of models are available to
represent this type of relationship. The model used in the present study
-47-
-------
is the threshold or susceptibility level model. This approach assumes
that each individual is characterized by a susceptibility level (reaction
threshold) which has some distribution in the population. A first
thought might be that the distribution is normal. However, there is a
fixed lower bound to the dosage, namely zero; a frequently encountered
distribution for quantities with fixed lower bound is the log-normal.
In the log-normal case, the population is distributed normally on the
logarithm of the quantity.
Assuming log normality for the distribution of susceptibility, the density
of individuals whose threshold is concentration (c) x one hour (for a
given pollutant, a given degree of impairment, and a given population type)
would be expressed by:
B 0 (z)
c where z = A + B (In c)
0(z) is the normal density function with mean 0 and standard deviation
= 1, and A, B are constants computed by least squares. Since the panel
was asked to estimate the dosage for given fractions of the population,
a more convenient form for computation is the cumulative distribution,
where F is the fraction of the population affected,
F = fz_m 0 (x')dx
This model is often referred to as the PROBIT model.
Although the PROBIT model is intuitively clear, it has the drawback that
computation is cumbersome, especially if curve fitting is to be carried
out for a large number of cases, since there is no elementary closed form
for the inverse of the cumulative distribution function.
Another model is the logistic (LOGIT) model. The LOGIT model can be
thought of as an extension of the familiar accretion rate type of relation-
ship where the fractional increase in the number of individuals affected is
-48-
-------
is proportional to the number remaining (unaffected) and the fractional
increase in dosage. In differential notation
*j = B'.(l-F) 4|
When this expression is integrated v/e obtain
, ' In F
1-F
= A1 + B'ln c
Since F and c are obtainable directly from the estimates, it is straight-
forward to compute the constants A1 and B1 by least squares. In fitting
the dose-response curves, three points are computed. Each point is
derived vn'th the following expression:. A1 + B'ln c
e A1 + B1 In c
1 + e A' + B' In c
when F is the affected population fraction.
Although the LOGIT and PROBIT models are based on quite different assumptions,
they generate very similar dose-response relationships. This is difficult
to demonstrate analytically.* However, the similarity can be shown graph-
ically.
Figure 3 shows the density distributions for the LOGIT and PROBIT analysis,
where the curves are fitted to the points F = .95, c = 1 and F = .5, c = .5.
Figure 6 shows the cumulative (dose-responsive) curves generated by the
density functions of Figure 5. In both figures the solid line is the
LOGIT analysis. The dashed line in Figure 5 is the PROBIT case. The
* Birmbaum reports that Haley has demonstrated that l(cj>(x) - x(l-?x} * <0-01
for all x» where is the normal density function and x is the logistic
function in "Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores" by F. M. Lord,
M. R. Norick. Addison-Wesley Pub!. Co., 1968. Pages 399-407.
-49-
-------
d f
dc
2.8 -
2.4 --
2.0 -
1.6 -
1.2--
LOG1T DENSITY
PROBIT DENSITY
5-
.1 .2 .3 .4 .5 .6 .7 .8 .9 1.0 1.1
OXIDANT DOSAGE ( ppm x hr)
1.2
COMPARISON OF LOGIT AND PROBIT
DENSITY FUNCTIONS
FIGURE -5-
-50-
-------
o
<.
cc.
Q-
O
0.
— LOGIT
0 PROBIT
4- FITTED POINTS
.1 .2 .3
4 .5 .6 .7 .8 .9 1.0
OXIDANT DOSAGE (ppm x hr.)
.2 1.3
COMPARISON OF LOGIT AND PROBIT
DOSE-RESPONSE CURVES
FIGURE -6-
-51-
-------
PROSIT case in Figure 6 is shown by the circled dots. The PROBIT curve
is not drawn in because it is almost indistinguishable from the LOGIT
curve.
As can be seen from the figures, the LOGIT density distribution differs
somewhat from the PROBIT distribution, especially in the vicinity of the
peaks, where the LOGIT distribution has a higher peak. However, the
differences tend to wash out when the cumulative distributions are
calculated.
For those who prefer the susceptibility model as a basis for the dose-
response relationship, the LOGIT analysis can be interpreted as a
convenient approximation, where the log-normal density distribution of
thresholds is replaced by the "near log-normal" density distribution of
the LOGIT function. Of course, some researchers may find the" assumptions
of the LOGIT analysis more persuasive.
One question remains. Although the two models are highly similar when
'fitted exactly to two points, serious discrepancies might arise when the
two models are approximated by least squares to more than two points. To
check this possibility, Figure 7 shows the least squares fit of the LOGIT
and PROBIT models to the case Oxidant, Normal, Discomfort, X, where the
LOGIT model gives a very good fit to the panel estimated points (crosses
in Figure 7). Figure 8 shows the least squares fit to the case Oxidant,
Normal, Disability, X, where the LOGIT model does not give a particularly
good fit. As the figures indicate, the least squares computation generates
about the same dose-response curve for the two models in each case.
In the present analysis, only three data points are being fitted for each
dose-response curve, namely the median estimates of dose for 10%, 50:-,
and 90% of population affected. It might appear that the data imposes
very little restriction on the model to be employed, and that, in fact,
any S-shaped curve with two undetermined constants would fit the data
equally well. This is not quite the case. The underlying phenomena
-52-
-------
dictate that the dose-response curve fall to zero at least in the vicinity
of zero, and that it approach 1 asymptomatically with increasing dose. If
a relationship of the type
F -• e
is postulated, as c--> <*>, b/c —> 0, and a must be 0 in order for F —> 1.
Hence, there is in reality only one constant to be determined by the data.
This formula gives a poor fit to the data, as the dashed curve in Figure 7
illustrates.
Another widely used S-curve is the so-called Gomperz curve
kC
F = k ab
or in logarithmic form
In F = In k + (In a)bc
The process constraints (F = 0 when c = 0, F = 1 when c = <») imply that
k = 1, a < 1 and b < 1. Strictly speaking, the Gomperz curve cannot
fulfill the constraints, since F = a at c = 0; however, if a is a very small
number this may not be serious.
In fact, the Gomperz curve does appear to fit the data fairly well, at
least for the cases Normal, Disability, X for each of the three pollutants.
For CO, the least squares a = 1/e , a very small number indeed! Hence,
the fact that the LOGIT anlaysis gives a good fit to most of the data
cannot be interpreted as a confirmation of the susceptability model. The
s
principal advantages of the LOGIT analysis are that the underlying model
is relatively clear and curve-fitting is computationally convenient.
-53-
-------
O
a:
u_
o
i—
<
G-
O
0.
LOGIT
O PROBIT
POINTS FITTED
__«_ go+b/c
.1 .2 .3 4 .5 .6 .7 .8 .9 1.0
OXIDANT DOSAGE (ppm x hr.)
COMPARISON OF LOGIT AND PROBIT
LEAST SQUARES FIT ON THE ESTIMATES (x) OF
OXIDANT DOSAGE CAUSED DISCOMFORT ON
NORMAL POPULATION.
FiGURE-7-
-54-
-------
o
<
cc
o
h-
<
Q.
O
CL.
.4 .5 .6 .7 .8 .9
OXIDANT DOSAGE (ppm x hr.)
1.2 1.3
COMPARISON OF LOGIT AND PROBIT
LEAST SQUARES FIT ON THE ESTIMATES (x) OF OXIDANT
DOSAGE CAUSED DISABILITY ON NORMAL POPULATION
FIGURE -8-
-55-
-------
C. Delphi Data vs. Experimental Data
Oxidant
The conditions that were queried in regard to the effects of photochemical
oxidant were discomfort as manifested by eye irritation, non-productive
coughing or chest tightness, disability as manifested by headache, and
incapacity due to respiratory or cardiac abnormalities or bronchopneumonia.
1 19 20-23
Eye irritation, ' non-productive cough and chest tightness or soreness
are the earliest manifestations-of exposure to photochemical oxidant.
1 23
Headache due to the irritative properties of ozone ' is likely to be a
more significant manifestation as this symptom often diminishes ability
to concentrate. Respiratory and cardiac problems as well as broncho-
pneumonia are potentially incapacitating complications of oxidant exposure.
Experimental data on oxidant effects relevant to this study are summarized
in Table 34. ....
Analysis of the estimates for each category of response in normal children,
. adults, and the elderly indicates consistency in the answers of the panel.
This agreement of opinion was most apparent in the estimates for the 10
or 50% dose-response rate. Less agreement was found in the experts'
estimates as to the upper and lower levels of human sensitivity to oxidants.
According to the experts, a one hour exposure to 1.50 ppm of oxidant would
cause incapacity in 90% of normal adults, 1.02 ppm would cause incapacity
in 50%, .77 ppm would incapacitate 10%, and 0.30 ppm or less would not
incapacitate anyone (Table 6-9). Slightly lower levels would incapacitate
the more sensitive group such as the children or the elderly. Disability
due to headache was predicted to occur in 90% of normal adults after a one
hour exposure to 1.00 pprn of oxidant, in 50% after exposure to 0.80 ppm,
in 10% after exposure to 0.41 and in none who were exposed to 0.20 ppm
s
or less; the predictions for discomfort were 0.80 ppm, 0.50 ppm, 0.30 ppm
and 0.10 ppm. Again slightly lower values were predicted for the dose-
response relationships of disability and discomfort in children and the
elderly.
-56-
-------
TABLE 34: Summary of Experimental Data on Oxidant Effects
Relevant to the Delphi Data
Concentration
(pprn)
0.37-0.70
>.30
1
0.37-0.7
1,0-2.0
0.38-1.59
0.8-1.7
0.5
0.25
Exposure
Time
2 hrs.
__
-_
2 hrs.
--
_ _
--
—
--
Subjects
Human
Human
Human
Human
Human
Mice
Human
Human
Human
Effects
Cough, nasopharyngeal
irritation, substernal
soreness, chest tightness;
symptoms accentuated with
excercise
Eye irritation due to some
photochemical products
Dyspnea, headache in most
subjects
Dyspnea, headache in 50%
of subjects-
Incapacitating illness
Presence of silicosis did
not affect muririe ability
to resist bacterial challenge;
• this is contrary to accepted
clinical assumption
Pulmonary congestion
Edema formation
Less than 6% of asthmatic may
have attacks precipitated
when oxidant concentration
>.25 ppm
Reference
20, 21, 22
19
23
20, 21
30, 31
42
26
47, 48
50
-57-
-------
The consistency of the expert opinion probably reflects the extensive
literature which is.available in regard to these dose-response relation-
ships. Numerous investigators have studied the affect of similar exposures
2 20 25 26-31
in volunteers, accidental poisonings and in experimental animal
opot;
models. Exposure to 0.37 ppm of ozone produces the same symptoms in
on
some volunteers. Eye irritation, a very sensitive indicator of photo-
19
chemical smog, is often due to photochemical products rather than ozone.
This abnormality can be present when oxidant concentrations are less than
0.3 ppm. The similarity of these experimental results with the estimates
provided by the panel of experts is obvious.
Although headache occurs secondary to oxidant exposure, dyspnea is more
•frequent and as such this symptom would have been a slightly better index
of disability. Most volunteers develop dyspnea and headache when exposed
2?
to 1.0 ppm of ozone. These symptoms occur, in less than 50% of volunteers
OOO^OO *• *
who are exposed to 0.7 or 0.37 ppm of ozone. ' x' Data concerning the
threshold value for these symptoms has not been reported. The experimental
results closely approximate the estimates of the experts.
Data concerning the dose-response relationship for illness such as respiratory
infection are derived from .accidental exposure and as such are fragmentary
as well as imprecise. The few reports that are available suggest that
short term exposure to 1.0 to 2.0 ppm of oxidant will cause incapacitating
30 31 '
illness. ' Whether lesser exposures can also induce illness is unknown.
The opinion of the experts was that a one hour exposure to 1.50 ppm of
oxidant would result in incapacity in 90% of normal adults, an estimate
that is consistent with these data. The estimates for illness in 50% of
normal adults (1.02 ppm) and in 10% of normal adults (0.77 ppm) are also
in accord with experimental data, as these levels of exposure will
20 21 22
undoubtedly produce dyspnea, cough and ventilatory disturbances. ' '
The panel did not agree very well on the estimate that exposure to 0.30 ppm
would not be incapacitating. This value would appear to be valid however
since numerous volunteers have been subjected to higher concentrations of
oxidant without incurring illness. Results from tests in sensitive animal
32 33
models also fail to show abnormalities at these exposure levels. '
-------
Volunteer or accidental toxicity data for these dose-response relationships
for children and the elderly are not available. Experiments with young
animals have shown an increased susceptibility to the acute toxic effects
of ozone. Although experiments with "old" animals have not been reported,
it seems likely that the age-related decrease in cardio-pulrnonary function
would enhance susceptibility to oxidant induced injury. Therefore, even
though the estimates for the dose-response relationship for these groups
cannot be evaluated objectively, they seem reasonable.
There was general agreement by the experts that patients who were compromised
by either a viral or bacterial illness would have enhanced susceptibility
to oxidant induced abnormalities. Good agreement was observed on the
estimates by the experts of the dose-response relationship for discomfort,
disability, and incapacity in 10%,. 50% and 90% of individuals with acute
viral bronchitis and influenza. According to the experts, cough (discomfort),
dyspnea (disability), bacterial pneumonia or acute respiratory failure
(incapacity) would result in children and elderly from exposure to levels
of photochemical oxidant that were less than the levels necessary to
produce discomfort, disability, or incapacitation in healthy adults. The
two infections of the lower respiratory tract were affected to a similar
degree with 90" of infected individuals experiencing increased dyspnea
at 0.80 ppm of oxidant and increased cough at 0.60 ppm. Ten percent of
the infected population would be incapacitated from either superimposed
bacterial pneumonia (influenza) or acute respiratory failure (viral
bronchitis) by exposure to 0.65 or 0.60 ppm of oxidant. Exposure to 0.30
ppm of oxidant would cause discomfort as manifested by cough or with
influenza cough and pleuritic pain. The estimates by the experts also
showed statistical agreement regarding increased sensitivity to oxidant
exposure for the 10%, 50%, and 90% population categories in individuals
with upper respiratory infections. The concentrations of oxidant
necessary to produce adverse effects of discomfort, disability and
incapacity were slightly higher than those necessary to produce the same
effect in patients with influenza or viral bronchitis. Although the
estimates of the levels of oxidant which would cause increases in dis-
-59-
-------
comfort, disability and incapacity for the various population categories
with bacterial pneumonia were usually not statistically significant, the
trend parallelled the estimated values for influenza. None of the estimates
for these disease states showed good group agreement in the 0% population
category. Hence, it would appear that the experts agreed that exposure
to 0.30 ppm or higher of oxidant would be harmful to some individuals with
acute infection but they could not agree on the lower limit of oxidant
sensitivity. The conclusion that oxidant exposure would enhance symptoms
or worsen already present dysfunction is consistent with a large body of
evidence indicating an additive interaction of oxidant exposure and
2 3 32-35
infection. ' ' The estimates for concentrations of oxidant which
would cause discomfort, disability and incapacity are quantitatively similar
20 21
to ones which cause cough and dyspnea in normal individuals, ' depress
•39 O7 Op
resistance to bacterial infection in murine models . ' '. . and result in
33 39 40
murine pneumonia. ' ' The conclusion that already infected individuals
will have enhanced susceptibility to ozone induced abnormalities is also
supported by data obtained in volunteers in which stress such as exercise
significantly increased sensitivity to oxidant damage.
According to the experts, patients with chronic lung disease would mani-
fest increased sensitivity to photochemical oxidants if their underlying
illness involved infection. Althought the dose-response estimates did
not always have good group agreement, the overall trend for the expert
opinion indicates that patients with chronic respiratory illnesses of a
non-infectious nature such as a pneumoconiosis or sarcoidosis are not
inordinately sensitive to photochemical oxidants. The only experimental
data which b'ear on this point consist of murine experiments in which mice
with silicosis were exposed to atmospheres of photochemical oxidant
(0.38 - 1.59 ppm) during a bacterial challenge. The presence of
42
silicosis did not affect murine ability to resist the bacterial challenge.
It should be noted that this apparent lack of interaction between the
presence of a pneumoconiosis and susceptibility to infection is contrary
to the accepted clinical assumption that such an interrelationship does
exist.43'44
-60-
-------
The experts uniformly considered photochemical oxidant exposure as a
precipitating cause of dyspnea (discomfort), exacerbation of bronchitis
(disability) and bronchopneumonia (incapacity) in patients with chronic
obstructive lung disease. Except for the 0% population category, good
agreement among the experts v/as shown in almost all of the dose-response
estimates. Respiratory abnormalities would be exacerbated in 90% or more
of patients with mild.chronic respiratory disease by exposure for one hour
to higher concentrations of photochemical oxidant 0.6 ppm or more. At
these levels of exposure patients with mild chronic respiratory disease
tolerated photochemical oxidant less well than comparably aged healthy
adults. The experts were also in agreement that this difference in
sensitivity would not exist at the lower levels of exposure. Comparison
of the predictions for discomfort, disability, and incapacitation of 10%
of the population shows that patients with mild chronic respiratory disease
can withstand the same or slightly higher levels of exposure as well as
healthy adults. Discomfort, disability and incapacity were markedly increased
in patients with severe chronic respiratory disease by exposure to photo-
chemical oxidant. The dose-response estimates uniformly indicated a 25 to
40% increase in sensitivity to photochemical oxidants for all segments of
this population category. The thresnold level at which a minimal effect
defined in this case as dyspnea, might be expected v/as in the range of 0.20
to 0.30 ppm. The few studies which have been performed in individuals with
severe chronic respiratory disease are in agreement with the conclusion
that this population group is most susceptible to the deleterious effects
4-3 44
of photochemical oxidant. v' Experimental evidence which has been
1 32 33 37-40 45
previously cited ' ' ' ' further supports the experts' contention
that the presence of severe underlying lung disease, hypoxia, and infection
provides a uniquely susceptible substrate for oxidant induced damage.
The experts' estimates of the dose-response relationship for discomfort,
disability and incapacity of 10,50, and 90% of individuals with mild or
severe heart conditions tended to agree in most instances. According to
the experts 20% or more of patients with mild heart disease were likely
to develop discomfort due to dyspnea after exposure to 0.40 ppm or more
-61-
-------
of oxidant. More serious disability (congestive heart failure) was predicted
after exposure to 0.60 ppm or greater. Pulmonary edema could be anticipated
in some patients who were exposed to 0.8 ppm or greater and the lower
threshold for effect (0% population) was estimated to be 0.35 ppm. The_
predicted oxidant concentrations which would cause discomfort (dyspnea)
were slightly higher than concentrations that were estimated to cause the
same effect in the elderly. The fact that slightly higher concentrations of
oxidant were estimated to be necessary to cause disability or incapacitation
in patients with mild heart disease than in the elderly can be attributed
to differences in the medical conditions which were queried in regard to
these conditions. Much more severe conditions, heart failure or pulmonary
edema, were chosen for these responses because they represent the major
consequences of oxidant exposure in patients with heart disease. The
experts predicted discomfort (worsening of congestive heart failure),
disability .(pulmonary edema), and incapacitation (angina or myocardial
infarction) in 10% of this population group for exposure levels which
exceeded 0.40 ppm, 0.52, and 0.60.
The experts' opinions were probably based at least in part on the edemag-
enic properties of ozone. Edema formation with resultant pulmonary
congestion, bronchoconstriction, hypoxia and secondary infection is the
ige
26
i 07 28
major cause of toxicity in humans. ' ' In normals pulmonary congestion
due to ozone induced edema occurs after exposure to 0.8 to 1.7 ppm.'
Numerous experimental studies have demonstrated edema formation after
exposure to as little as 0.5 ppm of ozone. ' The estimate that some
individuals already compromised by heart failure might develop pulmonary
edema after exposure to 0.52 ppm of ozone agrees with these data. Neither
epidemiological nor experimental data bearing on the relationship of oxidant
exposure to angina pectoris or myocardial infarctions has been reported.
However, the increased sensitivity to ozone during exercise suggests that -
under normal circumstances individuals with severe coronary disease may
be stressed sufficiently by exposure to oxidant to infarct compromised
tissues.
-62-
-------
Excellent agreement among the experts existed in the dose-response estimates
for 10, 50, and 9Qi of individuals with allergic conditions (asthma, hay
fever or sinusitis). According to the experts concentrations of 0.6
to l.'O ppm of oxidant would incapacitate asthmatic patients (status
asthmaticus) or patients with hay fever,, or sinusitis (nasal or sinus
drainage and headache), concentrations of 0.4 to 0.8 ppm would cause dis-
ability (asthmatic attack, nasal or sinus drainage) and concentrations of
0.3 to 0.6 ppm would cause discomfort (dyspnea, nasal or sinus discomfort).
As was the case with most of the disease categories, the threshold estimates
below which no effect would occur were unreliable.
This finding of good agreement among the experts for most of the dose-
response estimates as regards asthma is not surprising since data exist
from human and non-human investigations proving that bronchoconstriction
• 1 2 20 32 39
is a very sensitive index of oxidant exposure. ' ' ' ' The uniform
occurrence of ozone induced bronchoconstriction is the basis for the general
belief that oxidant exposure precipitates respiratory abnormalities in
asthmatic individuals. Data proving this association, however, are meager.
This is in part due to the understandable reluctance of investigators
to expose patients with asthma to oxidant atmospheres. The one published
epidemiological study indicates that a rather small proportion (less
than 6%) of asthmatics may have attacks precipitated when oxidant concen-
50
trations exceed 0.25 ppm. Data from experiments with guinea pigs
confirm the likelihood of this relationship, as animals that were exposed
to ozone prior to inhaling acetylcholine manifested immediate respiratory
51 52
embarrassment similar to anaphylaxis. '
Neither human nor non-human data exists interrelating hay fever or sinusitis
to oxidant exposure. In this disease state, it would appear that the
uniformity of expert opinion represented an extrapolation from the
assumptions made for asthmatic patients. Whether this explanation is true
or not can only be tested by asking the experts the reasons for their
virtually identical estimates.
-63-
-------
Nitrogen Dioxide
In contradistinction to the uniformity of opinion concerning the dose-
response relationships for oxidant exposures, almost all of the estimates
for nitrogen dioxide lacked significance. Group agreement did not occur
for any values among the normal adult, child, or elderly population groups.
This is not surprising since few human studies of the effect of acute
exposure to nitrogen dioxide have been performed, and these have usually
3 53-57
tested respiratory function rather than clinical response. ' Experi-
mental data from these and other relevant studies are summarized in Table 35,
Nakamura had 15 healthy persons inhale 6 to 40 ppm of nitrogen dioxide for
five minutes and found that airway resistance increased by 24 percent
53
just after termination of inhalation. Suzuki and Ishikawa had 10 healthy
persons inhale 0.7 to 2.0 ppm of nitrogen dioxide for 10 minutes and found
that the effective compliance, expiratory and inspiratory resistances did
not change immediately after inhalation was discontinued, but did change
at 10 minutes post inhalation. According to these data the inspiratory
resistance rose by 50 percent on the average, the expiratory resistance
rose by 15 percent (average), a.nd the effective compliance decreased by
approximately 10 percent. In a similar kind of human experiment Abe
observed a post inhalation increase in expiratory and inspiratory flow
resistance in healthy adults who were exposed for 10 minutes to 4.0 to
55
5.0 ppm of nitrogen dioxide. These' abnormalities were quite marked.
At 30 minutes after exposure the expiratory resistance was increased by
77 percent and the inspiratory resistance by 92 percent. These investi-
gators did not mention patient symptomatology either during or following
exposure to nitrogen dioxide. Hence, any prediction as to discomfort,
disability, or incapacity in "normals" is of necessity conjectural. The
lack of information in regard to nitrogen dioxide induced symptoms un-
doubtedly accounts for the difference in group agreement between oxidant
and nitrogen dioxide dose-response relationships.
Some group agreement occurred in certain estimates for infections such
as viral bronchitis, upper respiratory infections and influenza. The
-64-
-------
TABLE 35: Summary of Experimental Data on Nitrogen Dioxide
Effects' Relevant to the Delphi Data
Concentration
(ppm) .
6-40
0.7-2.0
4-5
25 or
higher
150-200
> 200
• 3.5
4-5
Exposure
Time
5 minutes
10 minutes
10 minutes
< 1 hour
__
—
2 hours
1 hour
Subjects
Human
Human
Human
Human
Human
Human
Mice
Human
Effects
Increase in airway resistance
by 24%
Expiratory resistance in-
creased by 15%; inspiratory
resistance increased by 50%
30 minutes after exposure,
expiratory resistance in-
creased by 77%, and inspira-
tory resistance by 92% .
Bronchi olitis and
pneumonitis
Fatal pulmonary fibrosis
Acute pulmonary edema and
death
Increased incidence of-
bacterial pneumonia and
death
Decrease in arterial partial
pressure of Og;. increase in
alveolar-arterial 02
pressure gradient
Reference
53
54
55
2, 58
1, 2
1, 2, 59
60
56, 57
-65-
-------
experts predicted that one hour exposures to 3.0 ppm of nitrogen
dioxide would cause disability (dyspnea) in 10% of individuals with
viral bronchitis and that exposure to 4.0 ppm would cause disability
in 50%. The threshold level for this effect in 0% of the population
was estimated to be 1.5 ppm. Discomfort due to cough was predicted in
10% of individuals with viral bronchitis following exposure to 2.1 ppm
of nitrogen dioxide and in 50% following exposure to 3.5 ppm. Similarly
trustworthy estimates in regard to upper respiratory infections were
3.0 ppm for disability in 10% of the population and 3.1 ppm for discomfort
(cough) in 50%. A threshold value of 2.45 ppm was agreed upon for incapa-
city (acute respiratory failure) in influenza and 3.0 ppm for discomfort
in 50% of patients with influenza. Acute exposure to nitrogen dioxide
is an uncommon occupational hazard of workers manufacturing nitric acid,
of farmers (exposed to silage—silo fillers' disease), and of .electric arc
workers. Although there is a considerable body of information indicating
that exposure to nitrogen dioxide enhances susceptibility to infection,
it is difficult to use extrapolations from these data as a comparison for
the Delphi predictions. Exposure to 25 ppm or higher for periods of less
2 58
than one hour has' resulted in bronchiolitis and pneumonitis. ' Comparably
1 2
short periods of exposure to 150-200 ppm causes fatal pulmonary fibrosis. '
1 2 59
Higher exposures are associated with acute pulmonary edema and death. ' '
Because these exposures were accidental in nature, the values cited are at
best crude estimates of concentration and duration. Experimental studies
have confirmed the cause and effect relationship between exposure to nitrogen
dioxide and diminished pulmonary resistance to infection. Exposure of
mice to fixed concentrations of 3.5 ppm of nitrogen dioxide for two hours
prior to infection with virulent Klebsiellal organisms results in a
significantly increased incidence of bacterial pneumonia and death.
Further studies with this murine model have demonstrated that the nitrogen
dioxide induced impairment in bacterial.resistance is due to injury to
the alveolar macrophage system. According to these experimental data
the threshold level for the antibacterial defect is 7.0 ppm for a 4-hour
exposure and 2.3 ppm for a 17 hour exposure. Exposure to nitrogen dioxide
concentrations of 5 ppm or more for 24 hours has been shown to enhance the
. A 9
susceptibility of non-human primates to influenza infection.: These
.'»
-66-
-------
studies are in accordance with the opinion of the experts that exposure
to nitrogen dioxide enhances pulmonary susceptibility to infection.
However, the evidence .is too fragmentary to allow quantitation of the
dose-response relationship.
Good group agreement was found in the expert estimates of the threshold
level for incapacity and disability in 0% of patients with severe
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Evidence for the validity of
these estimates (1.75 ppm - incapacity; 1.30 ppm - disability) has
56 57
recently been presented by Von Nieding and associates. *v These
investigators showed that a one hour exposure to 4 or 5 ppm of nitrogen
dioxide would significantly decrease the arterial partial pressure of
oxygen and significantly increase the alveolar-arterial oxygen pressure
gradient. Confirmation of these data would indicate that the experts'
seemingly low estimates of 1.30 or 1.75 ppm were realistic predictions
for populations with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. There
was little agreement among the experts on the estimates for the various
percentages of patients with mild or severe heart disease, asthma, hay
fever or sinusitis. This lack'of agreement by the experts can be attributed
to a paucity of information concerning the dose-response 'relationship for
these population categories.
Carbon Monoxide
Unlike the problem involved with oxidants in which secondary disease such
as infection is often the principle complication, carbon monoxide exerts
.its toxic effect directly by combining with hemoglobin to form carboxy-
hemoglobin. The high affinity of carbon monoxide for the hemoglobin molecule,
210 times greater than oxygen, results in physiological loss of the oxygen
carrying capacity of the blood. In addition to reducing the oxygen carrying
capacity of the blood, carboxyhemoglobin interferes with the release of
oxygen by the hemoglobin molecule. ' Hypoxia of varying severity is a
direct consequence of these two effects. Functional impairment and tissue
injury parallel the extent of exposure as this duration determines the
-67-
-------
degree of hypoxia. Experimental data on CO effects relevant to this study
is summarized in Table 36.
TABLE 36: Summary of Experimental Data on Carbon Monoxide Effects
Releant to the Delphi Data
Concentration
(ppm)
1000
500
100
53
50
50-100
Exposure
Time
--
1 hour
.5-2 hours
1.5 hours
2 hours
4 hours
Subjects
Human
Human
Human
Human
Human
Human
Effects
Vomiting, coma, death
Mild to throbbing headache
Increased COHb from 1% to
5-10%; interference with
higher integrative function
Shortened mean time to -angina
Shortened mean time to angina
Shortened mean time to angina
Reference
65
65
66-68
69
70
71
Because carbon monoxide toxicity is a common medical probl.em, much research
has been performed in patients with clinical illness as well as volunteers.
In normal individuals, the toxic effects of carbon monoxide as a result
of acute, high level exposure are the following: Concentrations over
1000 ppm typically cause vomiting, coma, and death. Exposure to 500 ppm
for one hour will produce a blood concentration of 20% carboxyhemoglobin
and cause mild or throbbing headaches. Exposure to 100 ppm increases the
blood carboxyhemoglobin level from 11% (normal) to 5-10%. Interference with
higher integrative functions such as vigilance, coordination, and psychomotor
function has been observed at these levels of carboxyhemoglobin. '
Whether similar impairments of mentation occur at lesser levels of exposure
such as 50 ppm (carboxyhemoglobin of less than 5%) is uncertain.
The dose-response estimates of the experts reflect this information. Good
group agreement is present for the 10%, 50%, and 90% segments of almost
-68-
-------
every population category, normal as well as abnormal, in regard to the
presence of discomfort (mild headache, errors in cognitive function) at
exposure levels of approximately 100 ppm. More precisely, one hour exposures
to carbon monoxide levels of 80 ppm will cause discomfort in 10% of children
and the elderly, levels of 103-120 ppm will cause discomfort in 50% of
children, adults and the elderly and levels of 130 or 140 will cause dis-
comfort in 90% of adults and the elderly. These values are virtually
identical to the previously cited results in volunteers. There is
no group agreement on the estimates for the threshold level. The absence
of agreement may reflect the discordance in results of dose-response
testing v/hich has been reported by different investigators. It is of
interest that the common value even though not agreed upon by the group is
very similar to the federal standard of 35 ppm for one hour.
With one exception the dose-response estimates in regard to the presence
of disability were non-uniform. Disability was defined as a throbbing
headache, confusion, irritability or dizziness. The average estimate
tended to be between 100 and 200 ppm. Similarly, with three exceptions
which will be subsequently discussed, the estimates for incapacity did
not show agreement.
The only population categories with some consensus regarding concen-
trations of carbon monoxide likely to cause incapacity or disability
were severe heart disease and severe chronic pulmonary disease. The
experts predicted the occurrence of angina pectoris, arrythmia, coma
or convulsions in 50% of individuals with severe heart disease following
a one hour exposure to 180 ppm of carbon monoxide. Good agreement also
occurred in the prediction that the threshold level for a 0% result in
this population category was 60 ppm. Both of these estimates are much
below those for all other patient categories. The uniformity in these
estimates as opposed to the lack of group consensus for most of the other
patient categories can be attributed to the widespread knowledge of
Aronow's studies in which angina pectoris and arrythmia's were induced
in patients with cardiac conditions who were exposed to 50 or 100 ppm
-69-
-------
of carbon monoxide. ' ' The group consensus in regard to the threshold
for incapacity for 0% population with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary
disease can be attributed to a uniform opinion that at least some of these
patients are so sensitive to any additional stress that any increase in
hypoxia will result in respiratory failure.
-70-
-------
V. REFERENCES
1. Stokinger, H.E. and Coffin, D.L.: Biologic Effects of Air Pollutants
Chap. 13, _In Stern, A.C.: Air Pollution and Its Effects, pp. 445-546,
New York, Academic Press. 1968.
2. Bates, D.V.: Air Pollutant and the Human Lung, Am. Rev. Resp. Dis.
105:1-13, 1972.
3. Goldstein, E.r Evaluation of the Role of Nitrogen Dioxide in the
Development of Respiratory Diseases in Man. Calif. Med. 115:21:27,
1971.
4. DuBois-, A.B.: Establishment of "Threshold" CD Exposure Levels.
New York Acad. Sci. 174:425-428, 1970.
5. Goldsmith, J.R.: Carbon Monoxide. Science 157:842-844, 1967.
6. Ayres, S.M., Evans, R., Licht, D., Griesbach, J., Reimold, F.,
Ferrand, E.F. and Criscitiello, A.: Health Effects of Exposure to
High Concentrations of Automotive Emissions. Arch. Environ. Hlth.
27:168-178, 1973.
7. Dalkey, N., Helmer, 0. "An Experimental Application of the Delphi
Method to the Use of Experts," Management Science 9, No. 3, 458-67,
April 1963.
8. Martino, J., Technological Forecasting for Decision Making, Elsevier,
1973, Chapter 2. Delphi
9. Dalkey, N. "An Experimental Study of Group Opinion," Futures, 1, No. 5,
408-426, Sept. 1969.
-71-
-------
10. Dalkey, N. pp. 428-419, (69, op. cit.J
11. Aitchison, J., Brown, J.A.C. The Lognormal Distribution, Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge, pp. 7-8, 1957.
12. Brown, B., S. Cochron, and N. Dalkey, "The Delphi Method: Effect of
Percentile Feedback and Feed-in of Relevant Facts," The Rand Corp.
RM 6118 Pr, March. 1970.
13. Hoel, P.G., Introduction to Mathmatical Statistics, John Wiley and Son,
N.Y., 1947, Chapter IV.
14. Dalkey, N. , Brown, N., "Comparison of Group Judgment Techniques with
Short-Range Predictions and Almanac Questions," The Rand Corporation,
R-678-ARPA, May 1971. . . . .
15. Wellisch, J., R. Patrick, N. Dalkey, "The Library and Federal Policy:
Delph Report," System Development Corp., TM-5093200310, April 1973.
16. Milholland, A.V., Wheeler, S.G. and Heieck, J.J.: Medical Assessment
by a Delphi Group. Opinion Technic. N.E.J.M. 288:1272-1275, 1973.
17. Dalkey, N.C.: The Delphi Method: An Experimental Study of Group
Opinion (Memorandum RM-5888-PR) Santa Monica, California, Rand
Corporation, June, 1969.
18. Pill, J.: The Delphi Method: Substance, Content, a Critique and. an
Annotated Bibliography. Socioecon. Plann. Sci. 5:57-71, 1971.
19. Haagen-Smit, A.J. and Wayne, L.G.: Atmospheric Reactions and Scavenging
Processes, Chap. 6, _In_ Stern, A.C.: Air Pollution and Its Effects.
New York, Academic Press, pp. 149-186, 1968.
-72-
-------
20. Bates, D.V., Bell, G.M., Burnham, C.D., Hazucha, M., Mantha, J.,
Pengelly, L.D. and Silverman, F.: Short-Term Effects of Ozone on the
Lung. J. Appl. Phys. 32:176-181, 1972.
21. Hazucha, M., Silverman, F., Parent, C., Field, S. and Bates, D.V.:
Pulmonary Function in Man After Short-Term Exposure to Ozone. Arch.
Environ. Hlth. 27:183-188, 1973.
22. Hackney, J.D., W. Linn, S. Karuza, E. Pedersen, A. Rusos, and J. Mohler,
Short-Term Exposure to 0, of Humans Subjected to Secondary Stress.
Presented at the meeting of American Thoracic Society, May 12-15, 1974,
Cincinnati, Ohio.
23. Hallett, W.Y.: Effect of Ozone and Cigarette Smoke on Lung Function.
Arch. Environ. Hlth. 10:295-302, 1965. ' -
24. Griswold, S.S., Chambers,_L.A. and Motley, H.L.: Report of a Case
of Exposure at High 03 Concentrations for 2 Hours, AMA Arch. Ind.
• Hlth. 15:108-110, 1957.
25. Goldsmith, J.R. and Nadel,"J.A.: Experimental Exposure of Human
Subjects to Ozone, J.Air Pollut. Cont. Assoc. 19:329-330, 1969.
26. Challen, P.J.R., Hickish, D.E. and Bedford, J.: Investigation of Some
Health Hazards in Inert-Gas Tungsten Arc Welding Shop. Brit. J. Ind.
Med. 15:276-282, 1958.
27. Belknap. Clinical Case Report: Symptoms of Delayed Shortness of
Breath Following Heavy Q-, Exposure in Helio-Arc Welding. Chicago Sect.
Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc., Milwaukee, - as quoted by Stokinger, H.E. and
Coffin, D.L. Reference 1, pg. 448, 1953.
28. Kleinfeld, M. and Giel, C.P.: Clinical Manifestations of 0^ Poisoning.
Am. J. Med. Sci. 231:638-643, 1956.
-73-
-------
29. Kleinfeld, M., Giel, C. and Tabershaw, I.R.: Health Hazards Associated
with Inert Gas Shielded Arc Welding Arch. Ind. Hlth. 15:27-31, 1957..
30. Young, W.A., Shaw, D.B. and Bates, D.V: Pulmonary Function in Welders,
Exposed to Ozone. Arch. Environ. Hlth. 7:337-340, 1973.
31. Kelly, F.J. and Fill, W.E.: Ozone Poisoning. Arch. Environ. Hlth.
10:517-519S 1965.
32. Goldstein, E., Tyler, W.S., Hoeprich, P.O. and Eagle, C.: Ozone and
the Antibacterial Defense Mechanisms of the Murine Lung. Arch. Int.
Med. 127:1099-1102, 1971.
33. Coffin, D.L. and Blommer, E.J.: Alteration of the Pathogenic Role
of Streptococci Group C-in Mice Conferred by Previous Exposure to Ozone,
Aerobiology - Proc. Illrd. Int. Symp. Ed. I.H. Silver. Academic Press,
London, pp. 54-61, 1970.
34. Alpert, S.M., Gardner, D.E., Hurst, D.J., Lewis T.R, and Coffin, D.L.:
Effects of Exposure to Ozone on Defensive Mechanisms of the Lung.
Appl. Physio!. 32-247:252, 1971.
35. Shy, C.M., Creason, J.P., Pearlman, M.E., The Chattanooga School
Children Study - II. Incidence of Acute Respiratory Illness. J. Air
Pollut. Contr. Assoc. 20:582-588, 1970.
36. Coffin, D.L., Gardner, D.E., Holzman, R.S. and Wolock, F.S.: Influence
of Ozone on Pulmonary Cells. Arch. Environ. Hlth. 16:633-636, 1968.
j
37. Huber, G.L., Mason, R.J., La.force, M., Spencer, N.J., Gardner, D.E.
and Coffin, D.L.: Alterations in the Lung Following the Administration
of Ozone. Arch. Int. Med. 9:221-227, 1971.
38. Goldstein, E., Warshauer, D.W. and Lippert, W.: Pulmonary Alveolar
Macrophage: Defender of the.Lung. J. Clin. Invest, in press.
-74-
-------
39. Miller, S. and Ehrlich, R.: Susceptibility to Respiratory Infections
of Animals Exposed to Ozone. I. Suceptibility to Klebsjella Pneumoniae
J. Inf. Dis. 103:145-149, 1958.
40. Purvis, H.R., Miller, S. and Ehrlich, R.J.: Effect of Atmospheric
Pollutants on Susceptibility to Respiratory Infection. J. Infect.
Dis. 109:238-242, 1961.
41. Bates, D.V. and Hazucha, M.: The Short-Term Effects of Ozone on the
Human Lung. Proceedings of the Conference on Health Effects of Air
Pollutants. National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council,
507-540, Oct. 3-5, 1973.
42. Goldstein, E., Eagle, M.C. and Hoeprich, P.O.: Influence of Ozone
on Pulmonary Defense Mechanisms of Silicoti'c Mice.- Arch. Environ.
• Hlth. 24:444-448, 1972.
43. Fletcher, C.M.: Disability and Mortality from Chronic Bronchitis in
Relation to Dust Exposure. AMA Arch. Ind. Hlth. 18:368-373, 1958.
44. Pemberton, J., Chronic Bronchitis, Emphysema, and Bronchial Spasm
in Bituminous Coal Workers. AMA Arch. Ind. Hlth. 13:529-544, 1956.
\
45. Rokaw, S.N., Swann, H.E., Keenan, R.L. and Phillips, J.R. Human Exposures
to Single Pollutants NOp in a Controlled Environmental Facility. Presented
at the Ninth Air Pollution Medical Research Conference, Denver, Colorado,
July 24, 1968.
46. Von Nieding, G., Wagner, H.M., Krekeler, H., Smidt, U. and Muyers, K.:
Absorption of N02 in Low Concentrations in the Respiratory Tract and
Its Acute Effects on Lung Function and Circulation. Second International
Clean Air Congress of the International Union of Air Pollution
Prevention Association. Washington, D.C., December 6-11, 1970.
-75-
-------
47. Alpert, S.M. and Lewis, T.R.: Ozone Tolerance Studies Utilizing
Unilateral Lung Exposure. J. Appl. Phys. 31:243-246, 1971.
48. Alpert, S.M., Schwartz, B.B., Lee, S.D. and Lewis, T.R.: Alveolar
Protein Accumulation. A Sensitive Indicator of Low Level Oxidant
Toxicity. Arch. Int. Med. 128:69-73, 1971.
49. Goldstein, E., Harshauer, D., Lippert, W. and Tarkington, B.: Ozone
and Nitrogen Dioxide Exposure. Arch. Environ. Hlth. 28:85-90, 1974.
50. Schoettlin, C.E. and Landau, E.: Air Pollution and Asthmatic Attacks
in the Los Angeles Area. Pub. Hlth. Rep. 76:545-548, 1961.
51. Matsumura, Y.: The Effects of Ozone, Nitrogen Dioxide, and Sulfur
• Dioxide on Experimentally Induced Allergic Respiratory Disorder in
Guinea Pigs: III. The Effect on the Occurrence of Dyspneic Attacks.
Atner. Rev. Resp. Dis. 102:444-447, 1970.
52. Matsumura, Y,, Mizuno, K., Miyamoto, T., Suzuki, T. and Oshima, Y.:
The Effect of Ozone, Nitrogen Dioxide and Sulfur Dioxide on Experimentally
Induced Allergic Respiratory Disorder in Guinea Pigs. IV. Effects on
Respiratory Sensitivity to Inhaled Acetylcholine. Amer. Rev. Resp.
Dis. 105:262-267, 1972.
53. Nakamura, K.: Response of Pulmonary Airway Resistance by Interaction
of Aerosols and Gases in Different Physical and Chemical Nature. Jap.
J. of Hyg. 19:322-333, 1964.
54. Suzuki, T. and Ishikawa, K.: Research of Effect of Smog on Human Body.
Research and Report on Air Pollution Prevention, No. 2, 199-221, 1965.
Quoted from Reference #46 by Abe, M.
55. Abe, Matsuo: Effects of Mixed NOo-SO- Gas on Human Pulmonary Functions.
Bull, Tokyo Med. Dent. Univ. 14:415-433, 1967.
-76-
-------
56. Von Nieding, G., Wagner, M.s Krekeler, H., Smidt, U. and Muysers !(.:
Minimum Concentrations of NCL Causing Acute Effects on the Respiratory
Gas Exchange and Airway Resistance in Patients with Chronic Bronchitis^
Int. Arch. Arbeitsmed. 27:338-348, 1971.
57. Von Nieding, G.: Studies of the Acute Effects of NC^ on Lung Function.
Influence of Diffusion, Perfusion, and Ventilation in the Lungs. Int.
Arch. Arbeitsmed. 31:61-72, 1973.
58. Ramirez, R. J. and Dowel! , A.R.: Silo-Filler's Disease: Nitrogen Dioxide
Induced Lung Injury. Long-Term Follow-up and Review of the Literature.
Ann. Int. Med. 74:569-576, 1971.
59. Lowy, T.,.Schumann., L.M.: Silo-Filler's Disease-Syndrome Caused by
Nitrogen Dioxide. JAMA 162:153-160, 1956.
60. Ehrlich,.R.: Effect of Nitrogen Dioxide on Resistance to Respiratory
Infection. Bact. Rev. 30:604-614, 1966,
61. Goldstein, E., Eagle, M.C. and Hoeprich, P.O.: Effect o'f Nitrogen
Dioxide on Pulmonary Bacterial Defense Mechanisms. Arch. Environ.
Hlth. 26:202-204, 1973.
62. Henry, M.C., Findlay, J., Spangler, J. and Ehrlich, R.: Chronic Toxicity
of N0£ in Squirrel Monkeys. III. Effect on Resistance to Bacterial and
Viral Infection. Arch. Environ. Hlth. 20:566-570, 1970.
63. Ayres, S.M., Gianelli,-S., Jr. and Armstrong, R.G.: Carboxyhemoglobin:
Hemodynamic and Respiratory .Responses to Small Concentrations. Science
149:193-194, 1965.
64. Bartlett, D., Jr.: Pathophysiology of Exposure to Low Concentrations
of Carbon Monoxide. Arch. Environ. Hlth. 16:719-727, 1968.
-77-
-------
65. Koch-Weser, J.: Common Poisons, Chap. 166 IH_ Harrison's Principles
of Internal Medicine, 6th Ed., 1970, pp. 652-653.
66. Horvath, S.M., Dahms, I.E. and O'Hanlon, J.F.: "Carbon Monoxide and
Human Vigilance," Arch. Environ. Hlth. 23:343-347, 1971.
67. Schulte, J.H., "Effects of Mild Carbon Monoxide Intoxication," Arch.
Environ. Hlth. 7:524-530, 1963.
68. Beard, R.R. and Wertheim, G.A.: Behavioral Impairment Associated with
Small Doses of Carbon Monoxide. Amer. J. Pub. Hlth. 57:2012-2022, 1967,
69. Aronow, W.S., Harris, C.N., Isbell, M.W., Rokaw, S.N. and Imparato, B.:
Effect of Freev/ay Travel on Angina Pectoris, Ann. Int. Med. 77:669-676,
1972.
70. Aronow, W.S., and Isbell, M.W.: Carbon Monoxide Effect on Exercise-
Induced Angina Pectoris. Ann. Int. Med. 79:392-395, 1973.
71. Anderson, E.W., R.J. Andelman, 'J.M. Strauch, N.J. Fortuin, and
J.H. Knelson. Effects of Low-Level Carbon Monoxide Exposure on Onset
and Duration of Angina Pectoris: A Study in Ten Patients With Ischemic
Heart Disease. Ann. Intern. Med. 79-46-50, 1973.
-78-
-------
APPENDIX A
QUESTIONNAIRES
-79-
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
I. PHOTOCHEMICAL OXIDANT
A, Normal 82
B. Children 83
C. Old Age 84
D. Heart Condition, Mild 85
E. Heart Condition, Severe 86
F. Hay Fever, Sinusitis 87
G. Influenza 88
H. Upper Respiratory Infection 89
I. Asthma . 90
J. Acute Viral Bronchitis 91
K. Acute Bacterial Pneumonia 92
L. Chronic Respiratory Disease 93
M. Mild Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease . . 94
N. Severe Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease 1 . 95
II. NITROGEN DIOXIDE •
A. Normal -...•.-.-.. 97
B. Children . .' ' 98
C. Old Age 99
D. Heart Condition, Mild 100
E. Heart Condition, Severe 101
F. Hay Fever, Sinusitis 102
G. Influenza 103
H. Upper Respiratory Infection 104
I. Asthma 105
J. Acute Viral Bronchitis 106
K. Acute Bacterial Pneumonia , 107
L. Chronic Respiratory Disease 108
M. Mild Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease 109
N. Severe Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease 110
III. CARBON MONOXIDE
A. Normal . 112
B. Children 113
C. Old Age 114
D. Heart Condition,, Mild 115
E. Heart Condition, Severe 116
F. Hay Fever, Sinusitis .• 117
G. Influenza 118
H. Upper Respiratory Infection 119
I. Asthma 120
J. Acute Viral Bronchitis 121
K. Acute Bacterial Pneumonia 122
L. Chronic Respiratory Disease ...... 123
M. Mild Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease 124
N. Severe Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease.;- 125
-80-
-------
QUESTIONNAIHEi; KOi? PKOJKC?
"HUMAN HEALTH DAMAGES FHOM KOiilI.,2 SOUi'iCK AIH POUAiT'ION"
PHOTOCinCKlCAh 0X1 DAliT
The following questions apply to all population ca t'-j;oi-. or--, included in this .-.tu.-.v.
Please use the attached wheels for your ancwors. Ti.e nnawcr:.. .r-r.ou^ci bo rr,.-,r.'.-id or.
the graphs and in boxec of appropriate column provideu 1'or each question.
(') Please indicate by an X the pollutant concentrations which if prone.-.'. for
one hour cause 9QX> of the stated population to suffer incapacity', dis.-.b:. i i'.y •
.and discomfort'. Indicate by a Y on both aider, of your X, the mr,;:? of
pollution concentrations which will produce the ir.dicav.ed i.ualtn rec.por.oi.-s
for 90X of this population; by that we mean the lower liir.it Y- , as the concen-
tration at which you feel there is only a 5% chanco trie true ansv.'er would be
below this estimate and the upper limit, Yy, as the concentration at which
you feel there is only a 5% chance the true answer would exceed your estimate.
In instances in which a health response occurs, write uown the average duration
of discomfort (hrs.), disability (hrs.), and incapacity (hrs.) in tr.c- boxes
under Column d) on the right. Indicate your degree of assurance conccrnir.r;
your answer in Column (2). Use a scale 'i-'.O where 10 means "I know the onov.-c-r
very well" and 1 means, "my answer is a sheer guess." Considerations to tsXo
into account in making this judgment are, how good is the inforir.jxtio.-. concerr.-
ing this iters; how well can it be estimated, etc. If you believe tnat the
response will occur at concentrations higher than those given in the scale,
write these estimates in the space above the graphs.
(2~; Please indicate by an X the pollutant concentrations which if present far
one hour cause 53%' of the stated population to suffer incapacity', die-ability"
and discomfort*. Indicate by a Y on both sides of your X, the ra:
for 50* of this population; by that we mean the lower limit Yj , as the concen-
tration at which you feel there is only a 5% chance the true answer would be
below this estimate and the upper limit, Yy, as the concentration at \r.icr.
you feel there is only a 5% chance the true answer would exceed your estimate-.
In instances in which a health response occurs, write dowr. the average duration
of discomfort (hrs.), disability (hrs.), ana incapacity (hrs.) ir. the boxe;
under Column (i) on the right, indicate your decree of assurance cor.c-srr.ir.r
your answer in Column (2). Use a scale 1-10 where 10 means "I know the ar.3-.vor
very well" and 1 means, "my answer is a sheer guess." Considerations to take
into account in making this judgment are, how good is the information co.-.~c-rr.-
ing this item; how well can it be estimated, etc. If you believe that the
response will occur at concentrations higher than those giver, ir. the scale,
write these estimates in the space above the gra.phs.
Please indicate by an X the pollutant concentrations which if present :"or
one hour cause 10# of the stated population to suffer incapacity', disability*
and discomfort*. Indicate by a Y on both sides o;~ yoi.r X, thi. ra_r..~9 of
pollution concentrations which will produce the indicated health respor.ses
for 10X °f this population; by that we mean the lower lirr.it Y- , as the cor.c•?.:'.-
tration at which you feel there is only a cj% chance the true ar.iwor wo-ld bo
below, this estimate and the upper limit, Yy, as trie concentration a;; whicr.
you feel there is only a 5/"> chance the true anr.wer would exceeu your eritirr.r.';'?.
Ir. instances in which a health response occurs, write aowr. the aver.-fe duration
of. discomfort (hrs.), disability (hrs.), and incapacity (hrs.) ir. the- boxeo
under Column (1) on die right. Indicate your octree of assurance cor.corr.i r.-
your answer in Coliur.n (2.). "J.-.o a t",»le 1-10 where 10 means "I know tho ar..v.-:er
very well" and 1 means, "my sr.ower :i u, a sheer guess." Considera-cior..;-. to -axe
into account in making thiy ;juci,',r;,ent are, how good is the information concern-
ing this item; how well can it be estimated, etc. If you believe that the
response will occur at concentrations hig-.'tior than those given in the scale,
write these estimates in the space above the graphs.
Please indicate by an X the pollutant concentrations which if pre.--.ent :'or orx-
hour cause 0,t of the stated population to suffer incapacity', disability" ana
discomfort*. Indicate by a Y on botli sidca of your X, the rar.re of ;>o'. lufior.
concentrations which will produce the indicated health respont.es for 0,. of
this population; by that we moan the lower limit Y^, as the concentration at
which you feel there is only n 5$ chance the true answer would bo below true
estimate and the upjier limit, Yrj, nr, the concentration at which you feel there
is only n y£ chance the true answer would exceed your cetimntu. indicate your
degree of assurance concerning your anc.wer in Column, (2). Use a scale 1-10
where 10 means "I know the answer very well" ,-,i.nd 1 m'enur., "my answer ic a
sheer guer.o." Conuidnrntiono to take into account i'.n making tint; judgment
are, how good ie the information concerning thio item; how well can it be
estimated, etc.
-81-
-------
POLLUTANT: PHOTOCHEMICAL OXIDANT
POPULATION CATEGORY:
NORMAL
DEFINITION OF CONDITIONS:
• Incapacity = may preoipitat.i-
respiratory an! ".-.rd
problems, bror.'::-.o-
pneumonia
* Disability = headache
• Discomfort - eye irritatior., v.oi.-
productivc cou,~::i"|j,
chest tightness
(1)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
I I I
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6
CONCENTRATION (.PPM)
1.8 2.0
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
(2)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
i i i i
i 2
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 ).4 1.6 1.8 2.0
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
INCAPACITY
DISARII. IT Y
DISCOMFORT
(3)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
0.2 0.4 0.6 O.S 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
INCAPAC IT Y
DISAOILIT Y
DISCO Mf ORT
CO
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
i i i t
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.0 1.0 1.2 1.4
CONCENTRATION (PPM]
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
1.6 1.0 ' 2.0
-------
POLLUTANT: PHOTOCHEMICAL OKI.PANT
POPULATION CATEGORY:
** Children - healthy children of IL-GE than
10 years of ago.
(1)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
n i <; r n M t n a r
90#
1 2
i 1 i i i 1 i 1 i i
1 i 1.1 i i i i I I
1 I 1 1 1 1 1 L 1 !
DEFINITtON OF CONDITIONS:
* Incapacity - may prcripi t.;ii o
respiratory and ••.•'.!••,
problems, bro:v:!.o-
pncumonia
* Disability = headache
* Discomfort = eye irritation, :.or.-
productive coui^:.i.:.,~,
chest tightnesr,
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2-0
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
I 1 I I
1 2
_) ! I 1 I ! I
I I
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMrOR T
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
(3)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
i i
_l I I
1 2
INCAPACIT Y
DISA3ILIT Y
DISCOMFORT
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
1 2
INCAPACITY
DISABIL I T Y
DISCOMFORT
0.2 0.4 0.6 .0.0 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.0 2.0
CONCENTRATION . (PPM)
-83-
-------
POLLUTANT: PHOTOCHEMICAL OXTDANT
POPULATION CATEGORY:
OLD AOK"
•• Old age - patients who have no proven
underlining disease but who on an
epide:nioloric basis are likely to have
senile emphysema and arteriosclerotic
cardiovascular disease (ASCVD).
DEFINITION OF CONDITIONS:
* Incapacity = acute rct-pi.ivit.ory :'ai
* Disability = bronchitis
* Discomfort - hyspnea
(1)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
i t i
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.0 2.0
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
(2)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
I _ I
I _ L_
1 2
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
INCAPACITY
DISARIL ITY
DISCOMFORT
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
j i
1 2
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
1 t 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.0 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
0*
IIIIIBIiii1*
t 1 I 1 1 p 1 1 i 1
| 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 i j
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.0 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
-84-
-------
POLLUTANT: PHOTOCKKMJ.CAL OX1DANT
POPULATION CATEGORY:
11 r.ftHT COnDIT UjjK^MjUj•'
" Heart condition due to any etiology such
as artcriOKclerotic cardiovascular disease
(ASCVD), rheumatic heai-t disease, hyper-
tension, ASCVL) witliout evidence of
congestive heart failure.
DEFINITION OF CONDITIONS:
* Incapacity - pulmonary ftlfMi.-i
* Disability = conpieytivc iicor;
faiLure
• Discomfort •- dyspnea
(1)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
r> :<;COMFOBT
90*;
i i i i 'i 1 i.i.i i
i t i i i i i i i i
i i i i i.i.i i ii
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFOR
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
(2).
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
1 2
1 1 1 1 1 f 1 1 t 1
1 1 1 1 *1 1 1 1 1 1
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
(3)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
n i <;r HM COPT
1056
I i i I i i fill
1 1 ! t 1 t 1 t 1 1
1 It t 1 I 1 1 f 1
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.0 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.0 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2-0
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
CO
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
aX
, , , . 1 2
( i i I t t i i i i
_ j_ ii i i i 1 i i ,
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
-85-
-------
POLLUTANT: PHOTOCHEMICAL OXIDANT
POPULATION CATEGORY:
HEART COMITTIGtl ..JjEVjvKE''
•• Heart condition duo to any etiology such as
arterioaclerolic cardiovascular disease
(ASCVU), hypertension, rheumatic heart
disease with clinical evidence of heart
failure.
DEFINITION OF CONDITIONS:
* Incapacity - angina or ;> inyo<-:;.i-.:i-i
infarction
• Disability = pulmonary edema
' Discomfort = worsening cor.ges'.ivc
heart failure
(1)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
n i<;cnMFnBT
9C#
i i.i.i i I i i i i
i i i i i i i i i i
i i i i p i i i i i
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFOR
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.0 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
(2}
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
50&
, , , , , ' 2
i i i i i ' i i i i i
i i i t 1-1 i i i i
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.0 2.0
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
(3)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
nt<:rr>McnDT
1C$
1 2
i i i i i i i i i i
i i i i i i i i i i
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
INCAPACITY
DISABILIT Y
DISCOMFORT
(t*)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
' *
i \ i i i i t i • i /
i i i i i I I i i |
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.0 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
1.8 2.0
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
-86-
-------
POLLUTANT: PHOTOCIIHIICAL OXIPANT
POPULATION CATEGORY:
HAY FEVER, sitjunms
DEFINITION OF CONDITIONS:
• Incapacity = nasal or siuur;. c.rai P..-I.-.-
and headache
* Disability - nasal or sinus draina.:v
* Discomfort = nasal or sinus dii-coir.'.'ort
(1)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
Dl SCOMFOPT
90£
1 1 i 1 I 1 It 1 i
1 i I I __l l.l.i 1 1
1 i I I 1 i 1 I.I 1
1
2
. ..,« ,._.
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFOR
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
1 2
1 1 1 1 II 1 1 ,,! , |
_ 1 I.I 1 1 ' I 1 I 1 1
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.0 2.0
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
INCAPACITY
0 I S A P. 11 I T Y
DISCOMFORT
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
I I I „ I I I
I I
_J I
t . I
1 2
i t
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
CO
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
1 1 1 1 ! 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 " 1 ' 1
1 •
1 1 r 1
1 2
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
0.2 0.4 0-6 0.3 1.0 \.'i 1.4 1.6 l.Q ; 2.0
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
-87-
-------
POLLUTANT: PHOT PC 1 [I'M 1C A I. OX 1 DftKT
POPULATION CATEGORY:
It.'FUIKfiX.A
DEFINITION OF CONDITIONS:
* Incapacity - nuporimposed bacton.-
puc'jiiioii i n
* Disability = clyupr.ca
* Discomfort = increased COM,-,:'. n::d
pleuritic pajn
(1)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
1 2
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
(2)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
1 I 1 1
i I
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
INCAPACITY
D IS A R 11 I T Y
DISCOM FOR1
(3)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
i t
1 2
_l I I I i 1 1 1 1 1
INCAPACITY
DISABILIT Y
DISCOMFORT
0.2 0.4 0.6 O.B 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
i i
1 2
1 1 I 1 1 1 1 t 1 I
1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 . 1
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
0.2 0.1 0.6 0.0 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 J,0. 2.0
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
-88-
-------
POLLU TANT: P]IOTCy:iTOJCAL_pjOJjAtjT
POPULATION1 CATEGORY:
'JI-';JK.'< N.-;."H HATOit'i" HIr'KJ'l'J 0.'!
DEFINITION OF CONDITIONS:
" Incapacity - c.ecor.dary i.'-i ':'.'.•!• i •'!
infect i or.
* Dic.'ibility = need Kiciiio.'itior. M:'.ri
' Discomfort = worscr.i n;; :;y::,])i.oi:ir
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
1 2
INCAPACITY
.! DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.3 2.0
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
(2)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
i i
_J 1 1 L.
_J
1 2
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
I I 1 L.
1 i p
i i i i i i i i i
J I 1 I I 1 L.
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
0.2 0." 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0
' CONCENTRATION (PPM)
(•'0
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
1 2
1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 II
. p
1 ' ' ' .III 1 ,.. 1 , • ,
0.2 0.4 0.4 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 {.6 1.8 ,'.' 2.0
CONCENTRATION (PCM)
INCAPACITY
DISACILIT Y
DISCOMFORT
-89-
-------
POLLUTANT: PHgrgiJ 1-™]-c A k PM1MI
POPULATION CATEGORY:
ASTHMA
DEFINITION OF CONDITIONS:
* Incapacity - st.atu:j ;ir.t.li:!rit i < •>:•
' Disability = asthnmtic .itl;u-;\
' Discomfort = dyspnea
(1)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
I . i I -..i I I 1 L
I I 1 1 t 1-
I I
0.2 0.4 0.6 O.S 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2-0
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCO/.'.FOST
(2)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
(5)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
1 2
J I I I I I I I I 1'
INCAPACITY
0 IS A h I L I T Y
DISCOMFORT
0.2 0.« 0.6 0.0 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
1 2
_l I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
D I S C O M f O R T
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
('4)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
_! 1 1 J I i j
1 1
_l i I
• 1
t i
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
0.2 0.4 0-6 O.B 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
1.6 2.0
-------
POLLUTANT: I'HOTOCHRIICAL OX_U)ANT_
POPULATION CATEGORY:
ACUTE V1K1AT. I'.RONCHtTir,
DEFINITION OF CONDITIONS:
* Incapacity = acute respiratory
failuro
* Disability = dyspnea
* Discomfort = cough
(1)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
m SCOMFOBT
90S;
I 1 ' ; 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
! I.I I 1 1 1 I 1 1
I.I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 2
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
0.2 0,4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
1 2
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I
INCAPACIVY
BISARIL !TY
DISCOMFORT
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
(3)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
1 2
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 II 1
1 1 i ! 1 ! t 1 1 1
INCAPACITY
DISAEILIT Y
DISCOMFOR
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
1 2
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
1 1 1 1 1 1 II 1 1
I 1 I 1 I.I 1 . . . . 1 1 ,
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DlSCOMFORl
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4
CONCENTRATION (PPM]
-91-
1.6 1.8 2.0
-------
POLLUTANY: PHOTQClim3Cftl.. QXIPANT
POPULATION CATEGORY:
ACUTE BACTERIAL PNEUM
DEFINITION OF CONDITIONS:
* Incapacity = acute rer,pi rnt.ory
failure
• Disability = dyspnea
* Discomfort = cough
(1)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
i i i i i
1 2
J 1 1 I 1 1 L-
_1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
(2)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
i i i i 1 1 1
1 2
i i
i i
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1-2 1.4 1.6 1.6 2.0
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
(3)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
i i i t
1 2
ii
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.3 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
CO
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
I 1
_) 1-
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
0.3 0.4 0.6 0.0 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.3 2.0
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
-92-
-------
POLLUTANT: PHOTOCHEMICAL OXJDANT
POPULATION CATEGORY:
CHRONIC RKSPIRATOHY D[..LEASES• •
** Chronic respiratory diseasee of a non-
infectious nature euch as pneuntoconiocis,
or sarcoidosis.
OF CONDITIONS:
* Incapacity = pneumorua
* DiEability =. respiratory ini'ectior
* Discomfort = dyspncu
(1)
INCAPACITY
OISABIUTY
DISCOMFORT
! 1 1
1 1
_! I ! L_
1 2
.J t
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.3 2.0
CONCENTRATION (.PPM)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
(2)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
i i
t I
t i
0.2 0-4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
l ,^-_L^_, * -< - ' t-
1 2
i i
i i
0.2 0.4 O^' 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
CO
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
t I
1 2
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.0 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0
CONCENTRATION (|>PM)
-93-
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
-------
POLLUTANT: i'liQTQCin-HiCAL oxiPANT
POPULATION CATEGORY:
MILD CHHONIC OnGTKlirTl'VE l.UliC mS>'.ACK*'
" Patientc with mild chronic obstructive
pulmonary diceuco are defined as individualQ
.who expectorates purulent sputum for periods
of at least three months during each year.
DEFINITION OF CONDITIONS:
* ItiCftpaci ty - brop.oho-pr:"'jr:oni'i,
cor pulmor.nlo
* Disability - exacerbation of
bronchi tir., fever ar.u
increased sputum pro-
duction and chest pair.
* Discomfort = dyspnea
(1)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
n i <; r n M c o » T
1 2
i I i i i 1 ii i , , i
1 i i i i i i i i i
i i i i i i t i i i
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFOR
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 I.I 1.4 1.6
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
1.8 2.0
(2)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
' 50#
, ' 2
i i i i i i i i i i
i i i ii i i i i i
0.2 0.1 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 '
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
(3)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
n t *r OM prio T
1 2
i i i i i i i i ti
i i i i i i t i t i
t i i t i i i i i i
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
U)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DUCOMFORT
0%
1 1 III 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1','! t |
0.2 0.4 0.6 .0.0 1-0 1.2 1.4 ).(,
CONCENTRATION (PPM) '
1.8 .2.0
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
-9/1-
-------
POLLUTANT: PHOTOCHEMICAL OXItlANT
POPULATION CATEGORY:
SEVERE .CHRONIC OB.OTHUCTI VK L'lNH UTSKASK* *
** Patients with severe chronic obstructive
pulmonary disease are defined as individuals
who in addition to expectorating purulent
sputum for periods of at least three months
during each year, also, have a diminished FKV
and persistent hypoxumia with arterial blood
oxygen tensions of <60 mm hg.
DEFINITION OF CONDITIONS:
* Incapeicity - b]iop.ciio-]v.''".:r!o:. \.-..
cor pulmor.'tle
" Disability = exacorLa! ior. of irr
chitis, fevor a:..i
increased spu'.':n
production ar.d c.'.o
* Discomfort = dyspnea
(1)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
, ' , , , • ' 2
I i i i i i i i I I
I i i t I i i i i I
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
INCAPACITY
_J 1
1 2
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.6 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
DISCOMFORT
(?)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
ni*;rnMFocT
' 2
i i i i i i i i i i
i i ? ' i i i i , i ,
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
INCAPACITY
DISABILIT Y
DISCOMFORT
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4
CONCENTRATION • (PPM)
1.6
1.8 2.0
INCAPACITY
DISABILI TY
DISCOMFORT
-95-
-------
QUESTIONNAIRES FUN
"HUKAN HEALTH DAMAGES FROM MOBILE SOU3CK AIK POuI,UT!.CN"
NITROGEN 1)10X1 OK
The following questions apply to all population caUj^oru't-- included ir. thus c.turlY.
Please use I he attached r.heetr. for your answer.'.!. Tiie answer;-. should he marked on
the graphs nnd in boxes of appropriate column provided for each question.
(") Please indicate tay ar. X the pollutant concentration.?, which if present for
one hour cau.oc 90S of the stated population to suffer incapacity', disability*
and discomfort". Indicate by a Y on both tides of your X, the i-a;..;" o:'
pollution concentrations which will produce the indicated hcaltn responses
for 9CT'J of this population; by that wo mean the lower liir.it Yj , as the cor.o-r.
tration at which you feel there is only a 5$ chance the true ar.r.v.'.T wo.;ia bo
bolow thir, estimate and the upper limit, Yy, as the concentration ;>'. v.r.ich
you feel there is only a 5% chance the true answer would exceed your ocfur,,-u>. .
In instances in which a. health response occurs, write dowr. the average Durati
of discomfort. Chrs.), disability (hrs.), and incapacity (hr.-;.) ir. tho box ••;.••»
under Column (l) on the right. Indicate your degree of assurance cor. corn; .-..;
your answer in Column (2). Use a scale 1-10 where 10 moar.s "I know thr ar.ov.'.
into account in maxing this judgment are, how good is the ir.for~;;itj.o,-. c one •..•".-
ing this item; how well can it be estimated, etc. If you believe th-r.t tr.,:
response will occur at concentrations higher than those given in the scale,
write these estimates in the space above the graphs.
(2) Please indicate by an X the pollutant concentrations which if prosei--.
one hour cause 50& of the stated population to suffer incapacity', uu,
nnd discomfort'. Indicate by a Y on both sides of your X, the ran"-
pollution concentrations which will produce the .indicated nealtn rer.pij.-.rie:;
for 50X of this population; by that we mean the lower limit Y- , :,r, -.nc cor.'j'-n-
tration at which you feel there is only a 5% chance the true answer wo..>i '•.•;
below this estimate and the upper limit, Yy, as the concentration r,:. which
you feel there is only a 5% chance the true answer would exceed your osti ;;.•-, to.
In instances in which a health response occurs, write down the avcra;;e rii.r'i'.ion
of discomfort (hrs.), disability (hrs.), and incapacity (hrs.) ir. the boxec
under Column (1) on the right. Indicate your degree of assurance concern:. r.^
your 'answer in Column (2). Use a scale 1-10 where 10 means "I kno* :.ho ar.c.v;-vr
very well" and 1 means, "my answer is a sheer £uess." Consiycratio:.:, to take
into account in making this judgment are, how good is the inf orrr..->';i on concerr.-
ing this item; how well can it be estimated., etc. If you oeiievo tr.-it the
response will occur at concentrations higher than those given in the scale,
write these estimates in the space above the graphs.
(J) Please indicate by an X the pollutant concentrations which if present for
one hour cause 1CS> of the stated population to suffer incapacity", vi ^ability*
and discomfort". Indicate by a Y on both sides of your X, the r:tr.;"'; of
pollution concentrations which will produce the indicated health rOor/or.5.':s
for 10?' of this population; by that we mean the lower li.7,-, t Y- , m. ;./-.••: cor.-ren-
tration at which you feel there is only a yd chance the true answer wo. .Id ':. e
bolow tliis estimate and the upper limit, Yy, as the concentration .-.•. which
you feel there is only a 5% chance the true answer would exceed your >'; .-. I ii.vi •.•••.
In instances in which a health response occurs, write down the avera:;c; d;;r;.', ... on
of discomfort (hrs.), disability (hrs.), and incapacity (hrs.) ir. ;.hc- boxf.-o
under Column (1) on the right. Indicate your de,~ree of assurance cor.cerni:.-
your ar.ower in Column (2). Use a scale 1-10 where 1C) mean!; "I know the nr.sw.r
very well" and 1 means, "my answer is a sheer guecs." Consideration.? t.o t.MXo
into account in making this judgment arc, how good is the •.nforrr.ati.or. concern-
ing thir. item; how well cnn iC'"bo •'ctimatfii ,• etc. If you believe that the
respoiise will occur at concentrations higher than those given in the scale,
write these estimates in the epace abovo the graphs.
CO Please indicate by nn X the pollutant concentrations which if prer.ent for o:."
hour cause OX> of the stated population to suffer incapacity', disability* ar.rl
discomfort'. Indicate by a Y on both eidoo of your X, the r.-m^f of pol.H;tion
concentrations which will produce tno indicated health responses for O/ of
this population; by that we mean tho lower limit Y^, as the concentration at
which you feel there io only a f$ chance tho true answer would be below this
estimate and the upper limit, YIJ , as tho concentration at which you feel there
is only a 5W» chonco tho truo, answer would exceed your i.atirnntc. Indicate vour
degree of assurance concerning your anowor in Column (,?.). C,F,C n scale 1-10
where 10 -neana "I know tho anawor very woll" and 1 meano, "my answer is a
ehoer guooo." ConoidarAtions to toko into account in making thie •judgment
aro, how good is tho information concerning thia item; how wall can it be
estimated, etc.
-96-
-------
POLLUTANT: NI.TRQC.KN DIOXIDE
POPULATION CATEGOnY:
NORM A I,
DEFINITION OF CONDITIONS:
* Incapacity = may proci pi IM .-
respiratory an.! .-.-.i-.l!
problems, bror.ri.n-
pneumonia
* Disability = headache
* Discomfort = eye irritation, non-
productive cough ir.,<",
chest tightness
(1.
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
nurnMmpT
i i i • i i 1 i i i i
i t i i t i i i i i
i i i i i t t t i i
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFOR1
1234
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
1 2
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
1234
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
(3)
i i
1234
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
1 2
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
CO
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
i i r i i I i i i i
1 l i i i l I i I i
512345
CONCENTFiATION (PPM)
, • , ' . .l*
1 1 1 t 1 I 1 1 ,1 t
I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 |
INCAPACITY
DISABILIT Y
DISCOMFORT
INCAPACIT Y
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
-97-
-------
POLLUTAWT: NITHCCKIN DTOXinf,
POPULATION CATEGORY:
** Children - healthy children of lesc thyn
10 years of age.
DEFINITION OF CONDITIONS:
• Incapacity = may proo i in t:it"
rc^pi r.'i t ory :i:. i
canhi'ii: i fob 1 r: . ,
broncho-p: o\.:'.o:..:
* Disability = !-.eariarh.o
' Discomfort = eye irri i ••.' ior., :.o:.
product) ve ocr.,-;.i:'.,-
chect t ij-:.l::'•:-.=
1234
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
(1)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
(2)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
90&
! It 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
I.I.I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
512345
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
5<$
' 2
i i i i i i i i i i
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
INCAPAC IT1
DISARU ITY
DISCOS. FORT
(3) 10*!
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
' 2 3
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
i 2
INCAPAC ITY
DISABILIT Y
DISCOMFOR T
CO
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
-t I L
I , I I 1
I I I
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
-98-
1NCAPACITY
DISABILI T Y
DISCOMFORT
-------
POLLUTANT: NITCOGKM DIOXIDE
POPULATION CATEGORY:
*• Old age - patients who have no proven
underlining disco.se but who on an
epiderr.iologic basis are likely to have
eenile emphysema and arterioaclerotic
cardiovascular disease (ASCVD).
DEFINITION OF CONDITIONS:
* Incapacity - acute respiratory
foil ure
* Disability = bronchitis
* Discomfort = dyspnea
(1)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
nisrnMcnDT
90#
1 2
i i • i i i I i 1 i i
1 i i ii i i . i _ I I
i i i _ I t i ii I 1
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFOR
1234
CONCENTRATION (.PPM)
(2)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
1 2
i i i j i i \ i i l
i i ii i 1 ti i i
l.i. i l 1.1 til i
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
(3)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
' - <-
i i
1234
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
1 2
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 _ 1 . 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
INCAPACITY
DISABILIT Y
DISCOMFOR1
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
1 1
1334
CONCENTRATION (?PM)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
-99-
-------
POLLUTANT: NITHOGKN DIOXIDE
POPULATION CATEGORY:
HKAKT cc::nrriOii, I-UI..D"
DEFINITION Or CONDITIONS:
* Incapacity pulmonary fl'":i:i
•• He
03
(/
tc
c<
(1)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
(
(2)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
• Disability = con^cra j ve :.<--irl
• art condition due to any etiology .such as failure
-torioGclerotic cardiovascular disease
VSCVD), rhcunatic heart diccase, hyper- * Diccomfort - dyspnea
jnsion, ASCVJD without evidence of
jngective heart failure.
. '', - - ' 2
i i i i i ii i i i
i i i i i i i i i i
) 1 2 3 4 5
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
1 1 ! p 1 t 1 I It
1 1 1 1 i 1 1 t t 1
1 1 C 1 1 I.I 1 1 1
1
2
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
1234
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
(3)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
ni^rnvtcnDT
1C#
1 2
i i 1.1 i i i i i i
i i i 1.1 i i i i i
i __ i i i i 1.1 i i i
l INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFOR T
234
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
INCAPACITY
OISAOILITY
DISCOMFORT
1234
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFOR T
-100-
-------
POLLUTANT: H1TROGKN DIOXIDE
POPULATION CATEGORY:
HEART CONnmCII, SEVEKK* •
** Heart condition due to any etiology such
as arterioscl erotic cardiovascular disease
• (ASCVD), hypertension, rheumatic heart
disease with clinical evidence of heart
failure.
DEFINITION OF CONDITIONS:
" Incapacity = angina or ;j
myocardial i r. I'arot i.o:
* Disability = pulmonary edein.-i
* Discomfrot = worsening cor.f;ostivo
heart failure
(1)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
msroMcnoT
9C#
t i i i i I i i i i
t 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 !
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFOR1
1234
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
• • (2)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
1 2
i i i i i i I ii I
i i i i i I I i i i
I i i i i > ii i i
1 23
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
1234
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
I 2 3
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
(3)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
nicrnwcriDT
1°*
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
CO
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DKCOMFORT
1 1
i i i i i i i i i i
i t i i t i i t i i
\ i i i i i I i i*|
INCAPACITY
DISABIt I T Y
DISCOMFORT
-101-
-------
POLLUTANT:
POPULATION CATEGORY:
HAY Kr.VCT, JUNUolTIS
I'KfXlKN DIOXIDE
(1)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
* Disabilit.
' Discomfor
9<#
i \'ii i 1 i i i i
! ( i I t I I i t 1
1 i i 1 1 i I I il
DEFINITION OF CONDITIONS'-
* Incapacity = nar.nl or sis.nr
drti\iia(T,o nncl iuTid:
na^.nl or si nu^
drainafjo
nasal, or sinus
discomfort
1234
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
INCAPACITY
DISABIIITY
DISCOMFORT
(2)'
• i N C A PACIT Y
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
I I
1 2 3 <»
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
i 2
1 I ( j I I
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
(3)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
t i t i i
2 3
CONCENTRATION (PPM]
1 1
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFOR T
(t)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
i i
i i i i
i i
a 3 4
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
-102-
INCAPACIT Y
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
-------
POLLUTANT:
POPULATION CATEGORY:
INFLUENZA
jnoxioE
DEFINITION OP CONDITIONS:
* Incapacity - siiperirr.poi-fi!
* Disability = dyspnea
' Discomfort = increase,! '-our.-. •<:.
pleuritic pair.
(1)
CAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
(2)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
(3)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
_j i
J i | i i
j i i i i i t i i i
! I 1
1234
CONCENTRATION (.PPM)
i i i
2 3
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
t t i
j i i i
i i
2 3
-------
POLLUTANT: N1THCGKN DIOXIDE
POPULATION CATEGORY:
UPPER RKSl'IIiATOHY li.TF.CTION
DEFINITSON OF CONDITIONS:
* Incapacity -. secondary lw ' <'i-i :i!
i M f Of: t i or;
* Disability ^ nocrl mediant io; ••>.: :
rest
" Discomfort = worsening :3y:r.r •. o~.-_
(1)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
90*;
t I
i j
_f L.
1234
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
(2)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
.J I I t I I 1 1 I )
2 3
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
(3)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
i i
[ i
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
1 2
! INCAPACITY
_J
DISABILIT Y
DISCOMFORT
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
j I i i
1 2
1 1 1 1 1 It 1 1 t
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 f
1234
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
-104-
INCAPACITY
DISADILI T Y
DISCOMFORT
-------
:\";LLUTANTs
PO: ; .ATION CATEGORY:
AS'I'MJ-'.A
.KN DIOXIDE
DEFINITION OF CONDITIONS:
* Incapacity statue. ,-i:-.ti. mat. i ••;.
* Disability - opthmatir attack
• Discomfort - dyspr.f;a
(1)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
(a)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
(3)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
(<*)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
i i I
j i i i i i i i i i
1231
CONCENTRATION (.PPM)
i i i
1 2 3
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
1234
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
an-
v 2 3
-------
POLLUTANT: NTi'ROr.K'N MOjODK.
POPULATION CATEGORY:
ACUTE VIRIAI. BHONCHins
DEFINITION OF CONDITIONS:
* Incapacity = ncuto rosi-i yi'.oi'y
fai Un-c
• Dicubility = dyspr.ijj.
* Discomfort =.- couph
(1)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
_J_
i i >
)23
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFOR T
(2)
.INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
_1 I L_
_l 1-
123*
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
1 2
INCAPACITY
DIS ABILITY
DISCOMFORT
(5)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
CO
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
1 t 1
1 II 1
1 1
23
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
OX,
1 2
,) I i i i
INCAPACITY
DISABILIT Y
DISCOMFORT
1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 ! 'f i 1
I 1 1 i i 1 1 I i ,
0 J 2 3 4 S
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
-106-
-------
P( . ,'JTANT:
POPULATION CATEGORY;
ACUTK BACTKHTAI, PilFl'MONJA
DEFINITION OF COMDI
* Incapacity .-- acute ror.pi r;ii ury
intin rf
* LH.s-ubi 1L t y -• dy.°.j'r.e.'t
* Discomfort - coiu';h
(1)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
(2)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
(3)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
l i i i L 1 1 1 1
i i i 1 L.
l i | i_
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
t t
_l j I 1 1 L 1
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
I I
i i
_j i t
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
1 1
i i
J I I
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
i i
t i
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
of.
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
234
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
•-107-
i i
1 1 t lit 1 t I 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1
INCAPACITY
DISABILI T Y
DISCOMFO RT
-------
POLLUTANT: Nl'TOOGKN DTOXIDK
POPULATION CATEGORY:
c PJT.KRATORY lur.FASEr.' *
** Chronic respiratory diseasco of n non-
infectious nature cuch.as pneurcoconiosis,
or enrcoidodis.
DEFINITION OF CONDITIONS:
* Incapacity - pneumonia
" Disability = rcspirntorv •. m>ct:o:
* Discomfort - dycrr.ea
(1)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
1234
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
i 2
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
.(2)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
1 _ I
1 - L.
1234
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
1 2
INCAPACITY
DISARIL ITY
DISCOMFOR1
1 2
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
(
CO
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
i i i t i i i i t t
L 1 1 i 1 1 1 t t 1
5123-55
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
, , , , . ' 2
1 1 1 11 1 1 1 I 1
i I i I i I 1 i r i
1231
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
. 5
INCAPACIT Y
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
-108-
-------
POLLUTANT: NITROGKN DIOXIDE
POPULATION CATEGORY:
HIM) CliROiilC OICTHUC'VIVE I.UIB lHSEA.'jE* *
" Patients with mild chronic obstructive
pulmonary disease arc defined as individuals
' who expectorates purulent sputum for periods
of at least three months during each year.
DEFINITION OF CONDITIONS:
* Incapacity = bronc:io-|>:if<.::-,or.i;i,
cor pulmoiviLo
* Disability = exacerbation of
bronchitis, '.'ever M.:i
increased r.pui.u:::
production and cr.est
pain
* Discomfort = dyspnea
(1)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
r>i«;roMpn&T
9<$
i i lit I i i ii
i i i i i i i i t '
i i i i i 11 i i i
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFOR
I 2 3
CONCENTRATION (.PPM)
. (2)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
'DISCOMFORT
t t i 1 1
1 2.3
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
1,1
1 2
i i i
4 5
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
(3)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
1 1
i t i
1 1
1234
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
t 1
1 2
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
CO
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
0*
1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , '
1 1 1 i I t 1 1 1 1
I.I I.I 1 1 1 1 1 ,
I 2 S
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
-109-
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
-------
POLLUTANT: NTTHOC'.KN DiOXIUE
POPULATION CATEGORY:
SKVEKE CHHONIC OBGTKirTTVF !.
OTGEASE' •
DEFINITION OF CONDITIONS:
* Jnc-HpaciLy
* Patients with severe chronic obstructive
pulmonary disease arc- defined us individuals
who in addition to expectorating purulent
sputum for periods of at least three months
during each year, also, have a diminished FEV
and persistent hypoxcmia wi th arterial blood
oxygen tensions of ^ 60 mm hg.
' Disability -
Discomfort =
bronoho-p
cor pulnio
cxacorb;.!
bronchiti
and ir.cre
product io
pain
dyspnea
i 01 of
s, fev
nr.-'i r.i
:: and '
(1)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
1234
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1
1 1
1 1
INC A P AC IT Y
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
(2)
INCAPACITY
DISABIL'ITY
50*
t' I 1 ( t 1 1 1 \ t
1 I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1
1
2
1 2 3
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
234
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISC
(3)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
n l QfTiM COD r
1 1 1 1 II 1 1 1 I
1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 i l 1 i \ l i I ]
2
INCAPACITY
D IS AB ILIT Y
DISCOMFOR T
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
I I I I 1 I
i 2
1 I I
CONCENTRATION ° (PPM)
-110-
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
-------
QUESTIONNAIRE.} KOR PROJECT
"HUMAN KEAIA'il DAMAGES KiJOM MOKII.j; SOUUC?; AIR POl.i/tiTlOi."
CAJWON HOiiOXlDK
The following question!:." r.pply to rill population catcgori <-s included in this study.
Pleacc use the attained j'.l.eete for your answers, "ho answers should be marked or.
the graphs and in boxes of appropriate column providcu for each question.
(1) Please indicate by an X the pollutant concentration.; which if present lor
one hour canoe tyUJd of the stated population to suffer incapacity", disability*
and discomfort*. Indicate by a Y on both sides of yo..r X, the r;i:..-•;.•• of
pollution concentrations which will produce the indicated health responses
for 90# of this population; by that we mean the lower liir.it Y^, as the concen-
tration at which you feel there ie only a J& chance tho true answer would be
below t'nic ectimate and the upper limit, Ytj, as the concentration at which
you feel there is only a 5% chance the true answer would exceed your estimate.
In instances in which a health response occurs, write down tho average Duration
of discomfort (hrs,), disability (hrs.), and incapacity (hrs.) ir, the boxes
under Column (1) on the right. Indicate your degree of assurance concr-rnvr./;
your answer in Colu.r.n (?.). Use a scale 1-10 where- 10 means "I know the answer
very well" and 1 means, "my answer is a sheer guess." Considerations to take
into account in rnakir.g this judgment are, how good is the ir. forma tier, cor.cerr.-
ing this item; how well can it be estimated, etc. If you believe that the
response will occur at concentrations higher than those giver, in the scale,
write these estimates in the space above the graphs.
(2) Please indicate by an X the pollutant concentrations which if prase.'/; for
one hour cause 'jO)o of the stated population to suffer incapacity" , disability"
and discomfort'. Indicate by a Y or. both sides of your X, the; 2ISJ1I2 o;~
pollution concentrations which will pi educe the indicated r.eaith rer
for 50/0 of this population; by that we mean the lower limit Y- , as ;
tration at which you feel there is only a 5% chance the true ar.3v:or
below this estimate and the upper limit, Y-j, as the concentration a:
you feel there is only a 5% chance the true answer would exceed your estimate.
In instances in which a health response occurs, write uowr. the average c:..ration
of discomfort (hrs.), disability (hrs.), and incapacity (r.rs.) ir. the bc.xc-s
under Column (1) on the right. Indicate your degree of assurance cor. c^rr.i.'.r
your answer in Column (2). Use a scale 1-10 where 10 mefi.'.s "I k;.o-; t;.s ancv/er
very well" and 1 means, "my answer is a sheer guess." nor.sidcrr.tior.s i.o tcJ-:e
into account in making this judgment are, how good is the information cor.cer.-.-
ing this item; how well car. it be estimated^ etc. If you believe t.'.at the
response will occur at concentrations higher thar. those giver, in the scale,
write these estimates in the space above the graphs.
(J>) Please indicate by an X the pollutant concentrations which if prese.-.t fo.-
or.e hour cause 10% of the stated population to suffer ir.cap.'j-it}-', c'.i;.,r.biiity"
and discomfort". Indicate by a Y on both sides of yo-.:r X, t.'.e rar.^e of
pollution concentrations which will produce the indicated r.ealtr. rer.;,or.se-s
for 1Q& of this population; by that we mear. the lower limit Y; , as the .-or.c-:.-.-
tratior. at which you feel there is only a 5'/> chance the true ansv.x-r viould be-
below this estimate and the upper limit, Yij, as the .oo.-.cor.tr&ticn i.'. v.-h:.. r;-.
you feel there is only a 5$ chance the true answer would exceed your i;st;mn • e.
Ir. instances ir. which a health response occurs, write .iowr. the aver;..7.- n ..-.-: tioh
of discomfort (.hrs.), disability (hrs.), and incapacity (;.rs.) ir. the .jox -..
under Column d) or. the right. Indicate your degree of assurar.ee cor. .>:::-,.„ r..~
your answer ir. Colu.~.n (2). Use a scale 1-10 where 10 means "I kr.ow tr.e '..-..v.-.'cr
very well" and 1 mcar.s, "ray answer is a sheer guess." Considerstior..- to ta.-:e-
into account ir. max ing this juogrr.cnt are, how good is the ir.formatio.-. co:.cfrr.-
ir.g this item; hew well can it be~ estimated, etc. If you ociievy that •..-,•:•
response will occur at concentrations higher than those given ir. the scale,
write these estimates in the space above the graphs.
('•») i-'iease incicate by in X the pollutant concentrations w:.ich •, f ;;.-•••.-.•••:,;. for o.-.e
hour cause OA> of t.;.p stated population, to suffer i :-.Ci:i'..-.r: i ;.v' , .: i s;,;,: 1 .-.-.•' ,-,:..;
discomfort". Indicate by a Y on both sides of your X, tho :-:,:-..-e o; :„-,:,•.. t i or.
concentrations which will produce the indicated health re:;oor.ses :'oj- •*/, of
this population; by that wo mean the lower limit Y[ , as the cuncer.tr-a-.iori at
which you feel there ic only a yd chance the true answer would be be'.ow t.-.is
estimate and the upper limit, Yy, as the concentration at which you feel there-
is only a 5A- chance the true answer would exceed you:- estimate. Jnd;c.-ite your
degree of assurance concerning your answer in Column (2). use n scale 1-10
where 10 neons "I know the answer very well" and 1 means, "my answer is a
cheer guess." Considerations to take into account i.-i mak-ing thin -judgment
nre, how good is the information concerning this item; how well can it be
estimated, etc. —
-111-
-------
POLLUTANT: £ARligN__KONOXj.DE_
POPULATION CATEGORY:
NOW-1AL
DEFINITION OF CONDITIONS:
* Incapacity = coma or convul :;i or..--
* Disability = throbbinj- hcadr.r:he,
confusion, irrilr.bi 1
dizziness
* Discomfort = mild headache, error
in cognitive f-jiTV.ic
(1)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
(2)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
90$
i i i ii i.i i i i ' 2
f i i j i i i i i t
i i i i i i i i i.i
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 160 200
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
•50&
i i ii i i i 1,1 i
1 ! 1 1 i 1 I t 1 1
1 1 1 III 1 1 1 1
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
INCAPACITY
DISARIL ITY
DISCOMFORT
20 40 60 60 100 120 140 160 180 200
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
1 2
1 1
30 40 60 SO 100 120 140 16O ISO 200
CONCENTRATION . (PPM)
INCAPAC ITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFOR T
CO
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
o&
1 2
i i * i i t i i X. I
i i i i i II i.i I
X
' , ' , I , \ 1 1 1 -.- 1 ... 1 1
20 40 00 SO 101) 120 140 100 ISO 200
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
-112-
-------
POLLUTANT: CARBON MONOXIDE
POPULATION CATEGORY:
** Children - henlthy children of Ices
thon 10 yeare of age.
DEFINITION OF CONDITIONS:
' Incapacity - roiiio or ronvu I .•• i on;
* Disability - Ihrobbi iij- !.i\-u:;,.- .-.
confusion , i rr i I :»• i :
di 7.zinesK
o
' Discomfort - mild headache, ••ri-or.
in cognitive furyM. jo:
(1)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
_1 I l_
_] 1
10 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 100 200
CONCENTRATION (.PPM)
I 2
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
(2)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
•if COMFORT
_j i
i i t t i i j
1111 i \ i
1 2
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
(3)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
i i i i i i I i i i
i i
i i
1 2
1
20 40 60 60 100 120 140 160 100 200
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
1 INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFOR T
CO
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMF0BT
1 1
1 1 1
1 2
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
20 40 CO BO 100 t20 140 160 100 200
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
-113-
-------
POLLUTANT: CAHgON MONOXIDE
POPULATION CATEGORY:
OLD AGK"
DEFINITION OF CONDITIONS:
* Incapacity = coma or convulsions
* Disability = throbbir.^ !.ea:i'jche,
confusio.", irrilabi.l:
dizziness
** Old Age - patients who,have no proven
'underlining disftace but who on fin epidcraiologic
basio ore likely to have senile emphysema and
arteriosclerotic cardiovascular disease (A2CVD). * Discomfort = mild headache, error
in cognitive .''ur.ctio
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
1 2
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 . .. !. 1
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DI'COMFORl
20 40 60 30 100 110 140 160 180 200
CONCENTRATION
(.PPM)
(2)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
5<$
1 2
i i i i i i \ ] f j
i i i i i i I i i i
' ' ' ' ' ' 1 ,,.'.,., \ >
,
20 40 60 80 100 120 HO 160 180 200
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
INCAPACITY
DISABIL ITY
DISCOMFORT
(3)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
CO
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DI5COMFOHT
1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 •
20 40 60 80 100 120 14C 160 . ISO 200
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
0%
i.i l i l l i ; i , '
i l i l l i 1 i f i
1 I.I 1 1 L . 1 .. _ _L__ 1 .
20 40 60 CO 100 120 140 160 180 200
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
-114-
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFOR T
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
-------
POLLUTANT: CAiiBON MOiiOXIPE
POPULATSON CATEGORY:
HEART CQtiDlTTON, MILD* * '
°° Heart condition due to any etiology such
ae erterioaclerotic cardiovascular disease
(ASCVD), rhournntic heart (licence, hyper-
tension, ASCVD without evidence of
congestive heart failure.
DEFINITION OF CONDITIONS:
* Incapacity = nnRina pectoris,
nrrythmia, r.omn or
convulsions
* Disability = throbbi ng he;idaci:e,
confucion, irri tabi1i ty,
dizziness, and increase
in dyspnea
* Discomfort = mild headache, errors
in cognitive function
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
(1)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
(2)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
90*
i i • i i i i i i i ..' 2
! I I l r i l I II
1 l 1 I ! l 111 1
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
50&
1 2
i i i i i i l i | i
i i > 1 t i 1 i i i
i i \ i i » I i | f
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
20 10 60 80 100 120 140 160 ICO 200
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
(3)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
i . i
1 2
20 40 60 60 100 120 140 160 180 200
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
CO
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
0*
20 40
60
100 120 140 100 100 200
CONCENTRATION
(PPM]
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
-115-
-------
POLLUTANT: CARKO^JfflNOXIDF.
POPULATION CATEGORY:
' Henri; condition due to any etiology euch
or. arteriopclerokic cardiovascular disease
.(ASCVD), hypertenoion, rheumatic heart
disease with clinical evidence of heart
failure.
DEFINITION OF CONDITIONS:
* Incapacity - congestive heart I'ai !•
* Disability = connective heart. r-Mi'
* Discomfort = mild headache, prrorr.
in cognitive function
(1)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
nuroMP OPT
9C#
i i i i i i • i i i j ' . 2
1 I 1 t 1 1 ! J 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
20 40 60 60 100 120 140 160 160 200
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
(2)
INCAPACITY
DISADILITY .
50*
i r i t i i i i i i
> i i I i i I I i i
11 i i > i 11 i i
20 40 60 00 100 120 140 160 160 200
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 !60 180 20O
CONCENTRATION ' (PPM)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
(3)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
m sroMFrtRi
, , , ,. 1 *
i i ii, i i i.i i i
i i i t ' i i i i i i
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
Q*
INCAPACITY
DISADIUTV
DISCOAAPORT
1 1 1 1 I
20 40 90 50 tOO 120 MO ICO tQO 200
CONCENTRATION (PPM')
INCAPACITY
DISABILI T Y
DISCOMTORT
-116-
-------
POLLUTANT: £L
POPULATION CATEGORY:
HAY FEVER, SINUSITIS
DEFINITION OF CONDITIONS'-
* Incapacity = coma or convul.r.i o::;-;
* Disability - throbbing headache,
confusion, irritabi1i'
dizziness
* Discomfort = mild headache, errors
in cognitive function
(1)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
1 1
!
1 1 ... t . .J
1
11 i
I.I
20 40 60 80 100 HO 140 160 180 200
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
(2)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
20 40 60 00 100 120 140 160 ICO 200
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
1 2
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
(3)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
i i
1 2
20 40 60 00 tOO 120 140 160 ISO 200
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
at.
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
1 2
1 1 1 1 1 Jt R -t 1 J
I 1 t t t 1 I t I I
20 40 GO £10 1CU 123 140 130 1£0 200
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
-117-
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
-------
POLLUTANT: CART,
POPULATION CATEGORY:
II!KLUF,!;ZA
(1)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
J I 1 1 1 1_
DEFINITION OF CONDITIONS:
.Ir.cap.'i^i'.y r: rcs;t;ii'i-itory :''i: 1 .:• .
coir.o , oo:'Y . 1 j ; or..
* Disability .- v:,robbi:-..- :.'•••.->•:••.• ,
co.':;'u.S!O:i, . IT: v : i .
di." 71110 £.•:., i:.'•.]••-• . • .
cys-pnec,
* Discomfort - r.il'-i •'.oa'j;;*.1:.';-, •••.::-:•.
in cogr.it: v-: :'•-:. • :o:
1 2
I I I
J i i 1 I i ! _j j._
INCAPAClTY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
20 40 60 SO 100 120 HO 160 180 200
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
I 2
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
1 I.I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1
1 1 I 1 ,, ,\, , , 1, . , , 1 1 ' 1
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
(3) 1056
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
I i
INCAPACIT'
Dl S ABIll T Y
DISCOMFORT
20 40 60 80 100 170 140 160 180 200
CONCENTRATION' (PPM)
CO
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
OlSCOMFOttT
1 2
—I 1 L. ,1 I I I 1 I 1
20 40 60 80 100 120 '.40 1GO 180 200
CONCENTRATION fpPM)
INCAPACITY
DISABILI T Y
DISCOMFORT
-110-
-------
POLLUTANT:
POPULATION CATEGORY:
UPPKR KhTjf'IHATOKY 1 !.'!• i-^Tl O.1!
MONOXDE
DEFINITION OF CONDITIONS:
' Incapacity =.- coma or convul.-; i or.:;
* Disability = tlirobb i >\£ hf,-id.-r::.e,
conl'usion, irriijibi 1 i •
dir.r-.incos
' Discomfort = mild he;idnc:.o, error.':
in cognitive fur." •; . o:\
(1)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
J
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
1 2
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
(2) -50K
'INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
_j L i I I I L
1 2
20 10 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFOR'
(3)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
_l L I I 1 1 L 1 1 1
I I
1 1 1 I 1 1
1 2
I 1
30 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 160 200
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
INCAPAC IT Y
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
CO
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
1 2
INCAPACITY
DISAIilLI T Y
DISCOMFORT
20 40 60 CO 100 120 140 160 1BO; 200
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
-119-
-------
POLLUTANT: CAUHON HONOXTDK
POPULATION CATEGORY:
ASTHMA
DEFtMITION OF CONDITIONS:
* Incapacity := coma or convulsion.",
* Disability = throbbing hcnd.-irhe,
confusion, irritnbilit
dizziness
* Discomfort = mild headache, errors
in cognitive function
(1)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
niSCOMFOBT
i 1 2
1 1 1 1 I 1 1 t 1 J
1 1 1 1 I t 1 1 1 )
— 1 __.J 1 1 1 J I.I 1 J
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFOK1
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 100 200
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
(2)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
1 2
i ' [ i ,* t i j i. j
i i i 1 i t I i ii
I i i i i t t t i i
20 40 60 80 100 120 - HO 160
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
180 200
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
(3)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DKrOMrriBY
' 2
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 | f J
t 1 1 \ \ 1 t 1 1 1
20 40 60 GO 100 120 MO 160 ISO 200
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
Ct)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DI5COMFOUT
C#
t , , , ' 2
1 1 1 1 1 C 1 1 1 > 1
i i i i i i i . i '•' i '
30 -50 80 SO 100 120 140 ISO tBO 200
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
-------
POLLUTANT:
HONCXTDK
POPULATION CATEGORY:
ACUTE VIRIAI. HROflCHTTJS
(1)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
(a)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
i i
DEFINITION OF CONDITIONS:
* Incapacity = without respiratory
fuilurf1, coma,
convulsi one
* Disability = throbbing heoda'-iio.
confusion, irritnbili
dizziness, increase i
dyspnea
* Diecornfort = mild headache, error:;
in cognitive functior
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 ' 1 1 1 ' ' 1 „ . 1 ... . 1
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
, ' 2
i i i i i f i i i i
i I i i i i t i i |
IN-CAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
20 40 60 80 .100 120 140 160 180 200
CONCENTRATION " (PPM)
(3) 10*;
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
1 2
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
20 CO 60 80 100 120 140 160 130 200
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
CO
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
I 2
-i. '
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
20 00 60 00 100 120 140 tGO 180 2CO
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
-121-
-------
POLLUTANT: CARUON MONOXIDE
POPULATION CATEGORY-'
ACUTE HACTEIilAr, n.'KUMONlA
DEFSNITiON OF CONDITIONS:
* Incapacity = respiratory failure,
coma, convulsions
* Disability = throbbing heacJac::e,
confusion, irritabi 1 n
cli?.zinecr., increase >n
dyspnea
* Discomfort = mild headache, errors
in congnitivc function
(1)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFOBT
- ' 2
I 1 1 ( 1 I 1 i 1 1
1 I 1 t 1 I 1 ] t 1
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFOR T
20 40 60 SO 100 120 140 160 ISO 200
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
DISCOMFORT
O)
1 N C A PAC 1 T Y
(
-------
POLLUTANT: CARHON j^ONOXIPE
POPULATION CATEGORY1- DEFINITION OF CONDITION'S:
CHKON1C RESPIRATORY DISKASEV • Incapacity =: respiratory failure,
- * ,,, . . . • ? como, convulr.io: :,
• Chronic reopirntory dxceasos of a non-
infectiono nature aucli as pneumoconiosio, * Disability = throbbin/- he.iil.'ir::,-,
or earcoidoeis. - confusion, irrit-ihi I i
dizziner-G, nr,(l i :;f|'e;i
in dyspnea
* Discomfort = mild headache-, error;:
in cognitive function
(1)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
n i
-------
POLLUTANT: CAHiiOH MONOXIDE;
POPULATION
mr.r> C
** Patients with mild chronu: obstructive
pulr.ior.iiry disease <-u-c defined as individuals
who expectorates purulent sputum for periods
of at looet three months during each year.
DEFINITION OF CONDITIONS:
' Incapacity = cona or convi Isi o::;-
* Disability - throbbing; headnrr.e,
confusion, irrit.-ib-. 1 ; ' y,
dizzi ues.s
* Discomfort = mild hcad.ichc, error.-.
in cognitive I'unrti o--.
(1)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
mtrnMt nnr
90$
ii V . i i 1 i i i i
i i i i i i ii i i
i i i iii i i i i
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFOR
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
(2)
INCAPACITY
DISABIUTY
1 1
< i i i i - i— i —i -, i ,,,!
i i t i I I I I i i
i i i ii i I i i i
20 40 60 60 100 nO HO 160 180 200
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
20 40 60 80 100 130 140 160 180 200
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
0?o
INCAPACITY
D 1 S A R 1 1 I T Y
DISCOMFORT
(3)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
nKrnMcooT
1($
1 1
i i i i i 1.1.1 i i
i i i i i i i.i i i
i i i 1 i t i i i i
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
20 40 00 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
-124-
INCAPACITY
DISABIll TY
DISCOMFORT
-------
POLLUTANT:
HONOXlDK
POPULATION
Potion In v;ith i.ovcrn chroni.c obstructive
pulmonary dic.cnr.e arc defined ac indi virtual r;
who in addition to expucl.oral.ing purulent
cputum for periods of at leaot three months
during eacli year, alco, have a dimi.ni.Bhod FF.V
and percictent hypoxcmia with arterial blood
oxygen tenciono of < 60 mm hg.
(1)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
(2)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY.
DISCOMFORT
DEFINITION OF CONDITIONS:
* incapacity = respiratory failure,
coma, cor.vu I:; i o:.s
* Disability - tlirobbir.p iiead;jr:.e,
confusion, i rritabiIi'
dizziness, and i.iii-r-'-'. •
in dynpnea
* DiEcomi'ort = mild headache, error:.
in cognitive function
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
111 1 1 1 1 1.1 1
11 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! 1
20 40 60 00 100 120 UO 160 180 200
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
506
i -J
i - - 1 -,..«.... ' ' ' ' - ' i i
1 1 ! t 1 1 1 1 | 1
1
2
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
20 10 60 80 100 120 i«0 160 100 200
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
(3)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFOBT
, ,. ' a
i i i i i i i i t i
i i i i i i iii,
•
50 <30 60 BO 100 120 140 160 ISO 200
CONCENTRATION (PPM)
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
CO C*
INCAPACITY
DISABILITY
OliCOMfOBY
20 40 60 60 100 120 140 '•P
CONCENTRATION (PPM) ,'!
180 200
1 2
i i i II 11 i i r
'i
— 1 1 1 1 L__ 1 1 J 1 1
1
INCATACITY
0 I 5 A t H I T Y
-125-
-------
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THE RESOURCES AGENCY
I RJ p^
!$ p
I
AIR RESOURCES BOARD
MARCH 1975
-------
AI'I'KHmX H
HUM AW HEALTH j)AM/vfiES FKQM..MO&J Lfr, SOURCES A1.1? POLLUTION
Second Round
sk 'WRv E;S.
Preared
ot
SttfiV'S :••:•;
. jiipJL J°ni/es(" i
JV.IH 1s
f o-l«veS iMfj-f Or
-------
TABU:; (')!•' t'.ONTKNT,",
.
A . Norm* I ............... _. ............................... (-3
® . Cl'i i l.d ren .......................... .................... k-&
£. Oil 4 Age ............................................... 7-9
P. He,a?H". Condition, M i.1'1 ................................. lo- 12
B. Ne*rt Condition, Severe ........................... , — 13'-'l£
F. NiJH 45^ ........................... .................... jo-iJii
-fc' Conditions.. ?4l id ............................... S3-^f
P1. Hay Fflvor, SinusUU ................................. ^~'?5
Ci . J nf luen^a ......... . ............... * ................... 8 ;! -t .3
ti . t/ppa?- .fespi I'atory /"•pf^e-i.'.ion ........................... 6''-!'-t 6
J . ASiKiKa ..................... . ........................ 6-'-&3
•J . Af ate |/iiVjl BroncKi^l5 ................................ '"f;3- ~2i
K . AciVifefc BMC tfiri^.f .^rte«.-'.«fl5t;*'i A ............ . ............ .... ''0'-7£>
L. Chrotr.i c Respiratory '£>\.s&ases ......................... 7^~ l£
Nj. M.H.,:i i.r Obs Ci't/c^'i vc Laiv
rj. Severe Chrcmic Obstruct" »/f Lun
JT1- CARBON MONOXIDE
A. Normal ............................................ &S-
B. Clixldren ..... - .................... ! ................... &>-s
C. Old Age ........................ .......... ......... gi-
D. Heart -Conditions, "Mild .................. - .......... . ^f-
E. Heart Condttton, Severe ............................. ^i"-
F, Hay Fever, Sinusitis . ............................... 'io(-
6. Influenza ..... ...................................... 73j-
H, Upper -Respiratory Infection, ................ ....... .. ltfb-
I, Asthma, ................................................ '0$- I ' I
J, Ac\ite VtoaA Brcjn.chitiAs:. ............ .............. 1 ..... ! 12,- i i-'i
K. Acute Bacterial Pneumonia' ............................. ] ^~ \ '7
L. Chronic *espii*atoi?y"- Diseases' .......................... ' l&~ ' ^
M. ^Mild Chronic Obstructive Luaig Diseases ................. J GJ - ' 2^
N, Severe. Cluromic Obstnucbive • Lumg-Dctseases ............... f 2J-f- ^
-------
3X1DHNI
NGRMRL
iNCPPflCITY
LU
Ix.
cc !
o
cu
_
O i
-25
.50
.75 I.QQ
DQSRGE
1.25
/ / / CURVE
* * / /« YL
/ /
//
: y 6RRPH 1
fl
1.343
-.357
-2.287
B
4.03C
6.537
/.424
ROUND 2
1.50
PPM X HR
1.75.
2.QQ
2.25
-------
NORMRL
DISflBlLlTY =':,
CURVE fl
YL 2.865
X 1.691
YU .030
.50
.75 1.00
DGSflGE
1.50
PPM X HR
1.75
2.QQ
2.
-------
NQRMflL
DISCOMFORT - eve ir^
CURVE fl
YL 4.585
X 3.165
YU 2.002
.50
.75 I.00
OQSRGE
1.50
PPM X HR
1.15
8.DQ
-------
QXIDPNT
CHILDREN
INCflPflCITY -
.25
I i
.75 1.00
DQSflGE
i r
1.25 1.50
PPM X HR
2.QQ
2.86
-------
QXJDPN1
CHILDREN
DISABILITY = rk
.50
.75 l.DQ
DOSflGE
B
5.180
6.338
7.878
ROUND
1.6Q
PPM X HR
1.15
2.00
2.SC
-------
CHILDREN
DISCOMFORT = e';e irrita-i
.65
• SO
.75 l.OQ
DGSflGE
l-CS 1.50
PPM X HR
1.76
2.QQ
-------
QX1DHNT
OLD RGE
INCflPflCITY = a.:,,e re5;i-
O.
C5
C?
CJ
LU
'o_
U_
cc
CT
ct:
o
cu
a.
o
.50
.75 I.
DQSRGE
/ / -CURVE
/ J YL
/ X
/ YU
/ GRRPH 7
i \ ! 1
DO i.es I.SG i.is
fl B
2.271 4.775
.043 6.338
-2.109 8.7M
ROUND 2
2. DO 2. 85 5
PPM X HP.
-------
OLD RGE
DISRBILITY = >-.-,-,--
.25
.50
.75 l.OQ
DQSflGE
1-2S 1.50
PPM X MR
GRPP
i
CURVE
YL
X
YU
H 8
i
i.15
n
4.140 5
2-262 7
-.555 . 8
ROUND
i
2.QQ
B
.014
.327
.59£-
2
i
-------
OLD RGE
DISCOMFORT = -,£-,_
ay
LU
(X
or
u_
o
cu
o.
o
.60
I I
; l.QQ
DGSflGE
CURVE fl
YL 7.807
X 3.842
YU 2.302
B
6.279
5.114.
6.692
GRRFH
RGUND
1.85 1.50
PPM X HR
1.7S
2.00
2.26
-------
QXIDRM
HEflRT CQND. MILD
INCflFflCITY = ~-----ary eier:
|0
JU7
.50
.75
DQSflGE
/ / CURVE fl
/ / YL 2.285
X / */
I / X -.358
/ / YU -2.442
/ • GRflPH 10
1 i I i 1
1.00 1.2S l.SC i.15 2. DO
8
5.782
7.239.
6.794
ROUND 2
2.25 2.5
PPM X HR
-------
OX1DR!ST
:HKT CGND° MILD
DISflSILITY
O —.
B7
'U-'u?
LJ
LU
U_
U_
cc
Oi
LJL
Cu
o.
o
1.00
DGSflGE
/CURVE
YL
X
YU
GRfiPH 1
i i i
1.25 1.5Q 1.7G
fl
3.685
1 -332
-1.294
1
2. 00
B
4.686
6.725
6.99G
ROUND 2
2.25 2.5C
PPM X HR
-------
QX1DRIYT
HERRI COND. MILD
DISCQHFQRT = /vs^e-
75 1.00
DQSflGE
CURVE fi
YL 5.959
X 5.077
YU 3.052
B
5.170
7.747
7.448
RRPH
12
ROUND 2
1.26
1.50
X HR
i.TS
2.QQ
2.85
-------
IDRNT
HERRT CQND.
INCRPRCITY = A:
.75 l.00
DGSflGE
1.26 I.GO
PPM X HR
2.DO
2.25
-------
QXIDPNT
HERRT CONG. SEV
DISABILITY
&OQ
.50
.75 1.QQ
DGSflGE
1.50
PPM X HR
1.16
8.DO
2.85
-------
HERRT CQND. SEV
DISCOMFORT = TC"rser.ir.? cor.ges-.:
>- £5 Q >^ * -*" c - "; • • •»•» -
T"
75 1.00
DQSflGE
CURVE fl
YL 5.554
X 4.300
YU 2.094
WH 15
B
4.613
6.800
8.557
ROUND 2
— , : , ,
5 1-5Q
PPM X MR
1.16
e.QQ
2.25
-------
o_,
a
o
e?
~0
-•to
o
CU
*1
0_i.
01
BXIDRNT
HflY FEVER. SINUS
INCRPRCITY = n,sal or sinus
YU -1-620
.25
.50
.75
B
6.279
8.239
10.283
ROUND 2
DGSPGE
i i.SQ
PPM X HR
I.IS
2.QO
2.25
-------
QXIDRNT
NRY FEVER, SINUS
DISflBILITY =
CURVE fl
YL
X
YU
4.699
4.179
1-198
GRRPH
i /
SflGE
1.25 i.SG
PPM X MR
1.76
B
5.010
9.308
12.385
R3UND
-------
QXIDflNT
HRY FEVER- SINUS
DISCOMFORT = ^£al ., slr..:.
DOSflGE
I -DO
CURVE fl
YL 6.669
X 8.025
YU 3.887
B
3.911
8.557
6.80G
GRflPH 18
ROUND
l.SS l.SO
PPri X HR
.CO
2.€5
-------
QXIDflNT
INFLUEN2P
-SS
-SO
i I
.75 l. 30
DQSRGE
INCflPflCITY = 3---eri=p^ei
B
6.279
10.180
12.957
ROUND
G 1.50
PPM X HR
2.QQ
-------
OX 1HP
. INFLUENZB
DISflBILITY =
l.QQ
DQSflGE
CURVE fl
YL 5.507
X
3.454
YU 2.119
GRPPH 20
B
6.279
6.279 •
11.353
ROUND
P
1.S6 1.50
PPM X HR
-------
QXIDflNT
INFLUENZfl
DISCGMFCRT =
CURVE fl
YL 8.380
X 5.507
YD 3.902
B
5.889
6.279
7.638
GRPPH 21
ROUND
76 1.00
DGSfiGE
5 1.60
PPM X HR
1.16
2.QQ
-------
QXIDflNT
UP RESP INFECT
INCflPflClTY = super-v:
CURVE fl
YL 3.340
X .830
YU -1.550
&QQ
I r
1.00
DQSflGE
i r
1.25 I.GO
PPM X HR
-------
O
ay.
CM
O
§.00
PXIDRNT
UP RESP INFECT
DISflBILITY= dysr-e,, or ne.
B
6.279
6.829
8.582
GRflPH 23
ROUND
.SO
.75 1.00
DGSflGE
1.25
1.GO
PPM X HR
1.76
S.QQ
-------
UP RESP INFECT
DISCOMFORT =
CURVE fl
YL 5.091
X 3.842
YU 2.683
B
4.046
5.114
8.00H
GRRPH 2H
ROUND
I.IS
8.QQ
2.86
DQSfiGE
.
PPM X HR
-------
QXIDRNT
flSTHNfl
INCRPflCITY -
o.
&QO
.es
.50
.75 i.QQ
DQSflGE
i.5Q
PPM X HR
2.00
-------
flSTHHfl
DISPBILITY= asthmatic
.76 1.00
DQSflSE
B
3.911
6.279
7.595
GRflPH 26
ROUND
l.GO
PFH X HR
1.76
S.QQ
-------
•QX1DHNT
RSTHtffl
I !
7S I.00
DGSflGE
CURVE fl
YL 5-441
X 5.507
YU 4.374
B
3.385
6.279
9.196
GRflPH 27
ROUND
1.€S I.GO
PPM X HR
8.QQ
2.
-------
VIRflL Bft
u t 7 ° C
** I ifc
V
_M27€
CURVE fl
Y! 3-45H
X 1-038
YU -1-393
RGUND ^
1.75
g.QQ
HR
-------
CXIDRN"
VIRflL BRONCHITIS
DISABILITY =
C Jl ~ -". •»
B
6.173
6.326
9.109
ROUND
DQSflGE
l.SC
PPM X H.R
1.76
2.QQ
-------
VIRRL BRONCHITIS
DISCOMFORT - ^**
1—._—r
75 l.QQ
DQSP-GE
CURVE fl
YL 8.812
X 5.507
YU 4.059
B
5.690
6.279
8.683
GRfiPH 30
ROUND
5 1,60
PPM X HR
1.76
2.QQ
2.50
-------
QXiDPNT
BRCT. PNEUM3NIR
INCPPRCITY =
C3_-
c
CJ
CA
.€5
.75 l.OQ
DdSflGE
5 1.50
PPM X HR
1-75
-------
QXIDflN'
PNEUMQNIfl
PlSflBlLlTY = onse, cr •.r.rser-Ir,
-SO
I T
,75 1 .CO
DGSflGE
CURVE R
YL 8.025
X 4.374
YU 1-465
B
8.557
9.196
10.634
GRRPH 32
ROUND
I.€5 l.SQ
PPM X HR
1.16
8.QQ
2.26
-------
QXIDRNT
BRCT. FNEUMQNIfl
DISCQflFQRT= ^-er.ir.* c? :c
CURVE fl
YL 7.313
X 6 • 563
YU 3.455
B
4.205
7.244
8.252
GRRPH 33
ROUND
DQSflGE
l.SS -l.SQ
PPM X HR
1.75
2.QQ
a.ss
-------
OXIDRNT
CHRQNIC RESP D1S
INCflPflCITY
YU -1.831
1.GO
OQSflGE
; I.CG
PPM X HR
1.76
2.QO
-------
GXIDflNT
CHRONIC RESP DIS
DISABILITY - respirer;.
.75 1.DO
DGSSGE
l.SS I.SO
PPM X MR
i. 75
2.QQ
8,85
-------
OXIDflW"
CHRQNIC RESP CIS
DISCQMF3RT = Js-^
t. 1.00
DOSflGE
CURVE fl
YL 5.023
X 4.734
YU 3.201
B
3.622
5.898
6.233
GRflPH 36
ROUND
I .So
I. GO
1.75
8. 00
2.2S
2.50
PFH X HR
-------
QXIDRNT
H CHRN Q8ST LUNG
INCRPflCITY = cr;
O—i
cc
CE
ul
LL.
o
1 CM
B
7.561
10.802
9.393
GRPPH 37
ROUND
DQSflGE
—— ~~™~T
; i.ea
PPM X HR
2.DQ
-------
GXIDflNT
Pi CHRN
T LUNG
DISABILITY - exa:
-75 l.CC
DQSflGE
PPM X HR
-------
QXIDflMT
M CHRN Q5ST LUNG
DISCGHFQRT - fe-
I.DO
DOSSGE
l.SG
CURVE fl
YL 7.807
X 7.307
YU
2.451
B
6.279
10.534
9.365
GRPPH 39
ROUND
I.SO
PPM X HR
8.QQ
2.SS
-------
o
0?
CE
iH
o
r' .-< rt
t>'J'J
QXIDflK
S CHRN QSST LUNG
IfOTRCITY = =rrr.ch3-,r.e^
.75
DGSflGE
1.00
B
6.279
6.279
7.766
GRflPH HO
ROUND
.—I———f_
l.SS 1.60
PPH X HR
K.7S
2.QQ
-------
QXIDflNT
S CHRN SSST LUMG
DISRBILITY = e^£ce-a,i
CURVE fl
YL 5.959
X 4.198
YU 2.619
B
5.170
6.990
9.540
GRPPH 41
ROUND
SRGE
r T
1.6Q
PPM X HR
1.75
2.00
-------
QXIDRNT
S CHRN QSST LUNG
D1SCGMFQRT =
.50
75 . l.QQ
DQ5RGE
CURVE P
YL 9.968
X 6.974
YU 5.706
B
5.275
5.785
8.185
GRRPH H2
ROUND 2
1.26
PPM X HR
i.76
8.00
-------
NITROGEN DIOXIDE
NGRNflL
O—.
a?
C_J
LU
Ij
i?
!CJ
cc
S'
i O.
o
1.50
3. CO
fl
-10.555 7.1
YU
-10.897
-18.996
5.51
7.91
GRflPH H3
ROUND
' fi.QO
DQSflGE
7,SG 9,CO
PPM X HR
10.50
12.00
13.50
IS
-------
NITROGEN DIOXIDE
NQRMflL
DISABILITY
o
cv
o_
O I
£.00
1.50
3.00
R
-16.078
YU
-14.154
-12.375
B
13.289
9.196
6.250
GRflPH 44
ROUND
O 6.QQ
DQSRGE
7.60 9.DQ
PPM X HR
10.60
ie.00
13.50
16.(
-------
NITROGEN DIOXIDE
NGRMRL
DISCGtfFORT = eVe irrltatlor
CURVE
YL
-4.565
-7.892
YU
coughing, che:
5.504
6.426
-10.680 7.125
GRflPH 45
ROUND
6.SO
DGSflGE
7.CO 9.GQ
PPM X HR
10.GO
18.00
13.50
-------
NITRQSEN DIOXIDE
CHILDREN
INCflPflCITY s i, ?reoipi^a,e
Cs.i- =._ ~>i
:Dj.e-s.
O
67
I
i
s<
iv—'
icJ
i i i
ItJ
!CE
CM
O.
O
1.60
S.QQ
DOSflGE
7.SO 9.0Q
PPM X HR
CURVE
« YL
X
- YU
fl
-10.
-12.
-13.
GRRPH 46
10 .GO
i
18.00
B
116 7.244
028 6.685
278 6 .094
ROUND 2
i i
13.SQ IS.t
-------
NITROGEN DIOXIDE
CHILDREN
DISPBILITY = *
lQ , c - r- -
i §1
CURVE fl
YL -8.855
B
8.271
-12.877 8-859
-11.698 6.229
GRflPH H7
ROUND
6.00
DQSflGE
7.GO
9.00
10 .SQ
12.00
13.50
PPM X HR
-------
NITROGEN DIOXIDE
CHILDREN
SO 6.00
DQSfiGE
DISCOtfFGRT = JU *~<^*:
CURVE
YL
R
-4.509
-6.637
YU
B
5 .795
5.815
-10.182 7.114
GRRPH 48
ROUND
7. SQ '9. GO
FPh X HR
10.60
18.QQ
I
13.60
-------
NITROGEN DIOXIDE
QLD RGE
INCflPflCITY- aou,e resrira-.
UJ§
CM
1.50
3.QQ
M.EQ 5.00
DQSfiGE
7. SO 3.. DO
PPM X HR
r
10.60
12.00
13. GO
-------
NITRGGEN DIQX1DE
QLD flGE
DISflBILITY = brcnehiti;
u.
u_
01
o?
CJ
iX
C£
U_
o'
cu
o.
o
CURVE
YL
-8.812
YU
-11.021
B
9.315
-11.679 8.557
6.309
GRflPH 50
ROUND
1.50
3.QQ
- r
6.QQ
DQSflGE
T
9.QQ
PPM X HR
10. GO
12.00
1—
13.50
-------
NITROGEN DIOXIDE
£•
l_
OLD fiGE
DISCQKR3RT
I.GO
3.CQ
6.GQ
DGSflGE
CURVE
fl
YL -H.827
-6.652
YU
B
6.317
6.279
-12.178 8.962
GRPPH 51
ROUND 2
9.co
FPH X HR
10.50
lg.00
13.50
-------
HERRI CQm, MILD
iNCflPiRCITY - ?£=r.£ry ede^a
CURVE fl B
YL -10.366 ' 7.816
1.50
3.DQ
4.GG 6.QO
DGSflGE
7.50 a.00
PPM X HR
10.GO
IS .00
13.SO
-------
NT Tt?Psrcr?M
hi i! VOLK j•<
IF
HEHRT CQND. Mli
DISPSILITV ,
Q.
o
LJ
LU
b_
10-
CT
CJ»
cr
o
CJ
O (
1.GO
5.00
DOSflGE
7.GQ 3.00
FPH /, HR
ID.SO
18.QQ
13.GO
-------
NITK5GEW DIQXID?
3.QO
M.SQ fi.OO
POSfiGE
HEflRT COWD. HILD
DISCQMPQRT
CURVE
YL -3.182
X
YU
-6.631
B
4.471
6.195
-12.478 8.708
GRflPH 54
ROUND 2
7-SO 9.OQ
PPH X HR
10.60
12.00
13.60
-------
NITROGEN DIOXIDE
HEflRT CQND. SEV
o_,
Q
l.GQ
3.00
M.SQ
OQSRGE
7.SQ "9.DO
PPM X HR
CURVE fl
YL -7.075
X -8.612
YU -10.897
GRRPH 55 R(
, s
5.513
. 5.057
5.513
3UNC 2
10.SD
18.00
13.SO
-------
HITRQGEM DIOXIDE
HEflRT CQND
DISfiSlLITY = pulr.or.ary eie^a
T r
B.
D3SRGE
-6.338
-9.511
B
6.473
6.856
-11.753 7.002
56
RQUND
7.510 9.QO
PPn X HR
r
10.60
i
12.00
13.50
-------
NITROGEN DIQX1DE
l.GQ
3.GO
HEfiRT CCND. SEV
DISCOMFORT =~
<4.SQ 6.GO
OQSflGE
CURVE
YL
YU
fl
-3.442
-7.467
-12.936
B
. 5.898
7.358
9.770
GRRPH 57
ROUND
7. 60
S.CQ
PPM X' MR
iQ.EQ 12.00 13.GO
-------
HP, •• '~ LVc.U
O-,
LU
cr
o
CM
l.GQ
-------
O
ay
lug
>— •
LU
-------
WTRQGOl DIOXIDE
HSY
OISCGRFGRT = naj
ss._ or sinus
f^~,~
CURVE fl
YL -5.000
YU
-9.367
-15.639
B
!6.502
7.996
10.594
GRRPH 60
ROUND 2
OQSRGE
PPH X HR
IQ.SO
IS .00
13.50
-------
c:--
o
O
r\' I*
l.SQ
-11.679
-12.343
YU -12.541
B
10.038
8.141
6.411
ROUND 2
U.SG S.Q-
DQSPGE
12. GO
13.50
FPfi # HK
-------
NITROGEN DIOXIDE
DISR0ILITY -
&QO
fl
-8.39H
B
9.032
-11.679 8.557
YU
11.978
6.869
GRRPH 6;
ROUND
Q 9.00
FPM X HR
13.50
-------
DiOXlDL-
O
&
'(.7
-
-X
o
Ci
c-
CURVE fl
YL -3.716
X
-7.526
B
i
6.Q33
7.175
-13.427 9.385
R3UND
-------
r '• '• c> u c1
;.. ;.J • . ••' C
/
X
-12.022 9.316
•8
Cv!
f
6M
ROUND
-------
NITROGEN DIOXIDE
UP RESP INFECT
DISRBILITY = need medication ar.d
rest
a
CURVE fl
YL
-6.
-12.678
YU
B
6.504
9.560
-10.638 6.253
GRPPH 65
ROUND
i.so
3.DQ
1 I
4.5Q 6.GO
DGSflGE
7,50
i
ID .50
1
12.00
PPM X HR
-------
NITROGEN DIOXIDE
UP RESP INFECT
DISCOMFORT = worsening syirrt r~:
3.DO
1 T
M.SO 6.GO
DGSflGt"
CURVE
YL
YU
fl
-4.803
-7.304
-11.937
B
6.556
6.722
8.268
. GRflPH 66
ROUND
S.fiQ
Til X MR
10.5
12.00
13.50
-------
NITROGEN DIOXIDE
flSTHNfl
iNCflPRCITY = status asthnaticus
fl
YL -11.275
-17.237
YU
B
9.832
10.802
-14.559 7.577
GRfiPH 67
ROUND
4.50 6.DO
DGSfiGE
7.so g.nn
PPM X MR
10.50
12.00
13.50
-------
NITROGEN DIOXIDE
flSTHNfl
DISABILITY = asthmatic attack
£7
CJ
YL
-6.233
B
6.816
-13.130 9.507
YU
-11.329
6.542
GRRPH 68
ROUND
1.50
3.DO
6.DQ
DGSSGE
i r
PPM X HRU
IQ.SO
12.GQ
13.50
-------
NITROGEN DIOXIDE
flSTHMfl
DISCOMFORT = dyspnea
§•
o
c?
o
L-J
O
CJ
CURVE
YL
-3.365
YU
B
5.010
-10.002 8.875
-17.605 12.224
GRPPH 69
ROUND
l.SQ
3.DQ
M.SQ
6. CO
7.GO 9.00
PPM X HR
IQ.SQ
1—
12.00
13.GO
-------
NITROGEN DIOXIDE
VIRflL BRONCHITIS
INCflPflCITY = acute re.pira:
failure
. -
. o i
Oi
1,50
3.0Q
6.CQ
n n -^:° c
R
-12.620
YU
-li-472
-12.148
B
9.365
6.922
6.083
GRflPH 70
ROUND
FPM
9.0Q
HB
10 .
2.GO
-------
NITROGEN DIOXIDE
VIRflL BRONCHITIS
DISRBILITY= dyspr.e.
c?
fTH X HR
-------
NITROGEN DIOXIDE
VIRflL BRONCHITIS
DISCOrj!FGRT =
o_
o
ay
I. GO
3.DG
'4.50 G.OO
DOSRGE
CURVE
YL
-2.960
-7.284
-11.661
B
4.2H3
6.671
8.108
ROUND
° .on
PPM X MR"
1.2.00
13 .
-------
NITROGEN DIOXIDE
BRCT. PNEUMGNIfl
INCflPPOTY = acut,
o
a?
-
1.50
3.QQ
M.SG S.DQ
DQSRGE
-17.059
-14.588
failure
B
11.670
10.188
7.374
GRflPH 73
ROUND
7.50
PPH X MR
10.GO
r
12.00
-------
NITROGEN DIOXIDE
BflCT- PNEUMGNIfl
DISRBILITY= dyspnea
o
J
J
j
o
CM
O.
O
CURVE
YL -4 .347
-9.613
YU
B
4.884
7.196
-11.358 6.800
GRRPH 74
ROUND
l.SQ
3.GO
I I
M.5D 6.DO
DGSflGE
PPM X HR
I
10.50
12.00
-------
NITROGEN DIOXIDE
BflCT- PNEUMONIfl
DISCOMFORT = cough
O-,
u
J_
u
XL
CM
o.
o
CURVE
YL
-2.367
-5.641
YU
B
3.719
5.321
-10.783 8.062
GRPPH 75
ROUND
1.50
3.00
4.50 6.QQ
DGSflGE
7.50 9.DO
PPM X HR
10.50
12.00
13.SO
-------
NITROGEN DIOXIDE
CHRONIC RESP DI5
INCflPflCITY =
07
_3
U
•CD
O
l.SQ
3.DO
DQSflGE
7.SQ 9.DQ
PPM X HR
12.00
13. SQ
-------
NITROGEN DIOXIDE
CHRONIC RESP DIS
DISABILITY = ciid .-.
ir.f ff.'.'. •
C7
CJ
lu
I?'
\—
U
C
b1
cy
o
1.50
3,00
M.50
CURVE
fl
YU
-14.814
-14.095
B
YL -10.426 9.196
10.436
GRRPH 77
ROUND
DQSfiGt
7.GQ 9.0Q
PPM. X HR
10.50
16..QO
-------
NITROGEN DIOXIDE
CHRONIC RESP DIS
DISCOMFORT = dyspnea
o—,
CD
CJ
"'O
O
CM
CURVE
YL
YU
fl
-3.008
-6.895
-13.039
B
4.687
6.536
9.433
GRflPH 78
ROUND
O L
oQQ
1.6Q
3.00
DQSflGJ
7.SO 9.CO '
PPM X HR
10.50
-------
DIOXIDE
M CHRN OBST LUNG
INCflPflCITY = tr
YL -9.269
DQSflGEL
PPK.X HR
-------
o_
NITROGEN DIOXIDE
M CHRN QBST LUNG
DISflBILITY= exacerbation of
CURVE
fl
YL -7.830
YU
-20.300
bronchitis, feve
increased suut'-rr.
production and ^
pain
B
9.072
-11.390 8.699
12.H89
GRflPH 8G
ROUND
l.SQ
3.0Q
M.5Q 5.GO
DG5PGE
7.CO 9.QQ '
PPM X HR
10 .GO
12.00
13.50
16,
-------
NITROGEN DIOXIDE
M CHRN OEST LUNG
DISCOMFORT - dysrr-ea
CURVE fl
YL -2.343
YU
-4.869
-15.522
B
H.H76
5.387
ll'.5H2
GRRPH 81
ROUND
6.QQ
DOSflGE
7,50
IQ.HO
12.00
13 .r,
FPM X HR
-------
NITROGEN DIGXIDE
S CHRN QBST LUNG
INCPP.flCITY = brcncho-pr.eurcr.ia;
cor -pulz.cr.ale
CURVE
YL
YU
fl
-7.034
-13.983
-17.333
B
7.787
10.802
10.585
GRflPH
82
ROUND
7.CO 9.00
•:.' p •.< y LJ q
I f i i A hi A
1—
10.GO
12.00
(
13.50
-------
o
c?
•CD
NITROGEN DIOXIDE
S CHRN QB5T LUNG
DISABILITY =
CURVE fl
YL
-4.717
YU
exacerbation of
bronchitis, fever
and increased sputur
production and cr.es'1
B
7.575
-10.982 10.136
-19.683 13.H33
GRflPH 83
ROUND
1.50
7.SR
10 .GO
2.00
PPM X HR
-------
NITROGEN DIOXIDE
S CHRN GBST LUNG
DISCGHFGRT = dysP:.,
C-J
6.no
CURVE fl B
YL -1.358 5.}?5
X -4.745 6.333
YU -9.973 8-3-
GRRPH 84
ROUND
1 I—
;Q 9.00
FFM X MR
—i—
10.50
.00
-------
CRRB3N MONOXIDE
NGRtffll
INCflPRCITY .
coma or
o.
C3
O
C7
'•'O
50. GO
10Q.00
-66.393 12.H50
YU
-62.005 11.208
-52.774 9.196
GRflPH 85
ROUND 2
i f ,
K50.C3 3SQ.CQ MOO.03 MGQ.OG
X HR
-------
CflREON MONOXIDE
NORMflL
DISCGMFGRT = mild headache, errors
ur.c
O
CD
O
O)
CURVE
YL
B
-33.852 7.699
YU
-62.258
-73.384
13.030
14.650
GRRPH 87
ROUND
50 .GO
10Q.GQ
LCO-CO
2CQ.CQ
I . 1
SCO.00 3GQ.00
-------
CRRBGN NQNQXIDE
CHILDREN
INCflPPCITY = co- or co^lsi-s
o.
o
CD
O
C'J
CO
ICQ .CO
fl
-60.933
-51.077
YU
B
11.753
9.345
-54.833 9.619
GRRPH 88
ROUND
?.G .TO SOO
I . >7'X V i Jr'
r; n A MSA
350 .CO
1
O;.I .DO
MbQ.00
-------
CPRBGN MGNQXIDE
CHILDREN
DISflB-ILITY =
2QQ.CO
CURVE
-69.171
YU
throbbing headache,
confusion,
irritability, .
dizziness
B
YL -H6.H69 9.556
13.492
-86.763 16.182
GRRPH 89
ROUND
2GO.CO 300.00
PPM X HR
50 .GO
MOO -CO
-------
CflRBGN MONOXIDE
CHILDREN
EO .00
100.CO
i en. c.i eco.ro
r!Tcrr
-------
CflRBQN MONOXIDE
OLD flGE
INCflPflCITY = coina or convulsions
o_
o
O
a
o
Oi
o.
o
&QO
6Q.QO
IOQ.OQ
I I
IGQ.DQ 20Q.DQ
DOSflGE
CURVE fl
YL -78.202
-44.261
YU
B
15.190
8.174
-42.147 7.447
GRflPH 91
ROUND
25Q.OQ 3QQ.QQ
PPM X HR
350.00
I
MOO.00
M6Q.OQ
600,
-------
CflREGN MONOXIDE
O.
O
O
SO
O
CJ
50 .GO
1QQ.CO
OLD RGE
DISRBILITY -
CURVE fl
throbbing hea-.i?.che,
confusion,
irritability,
dizziness
B
YL -H6.H69 9.555
-53.085 12.320
YU -6H.294 12.067
GRflPH 92
ROUND 2
MOO ,00
PPM X HR
-------
&00
CflRBQiN MGNQXIDE
QLD flGE
"I T
50.00 I00.00 150.00 200 .CO
OOSflGE
DISC0MFGRT= mild headache, errc
in cognitive fur.cti
CURVE
YL
fl
YU
B
-30.730 7.267
-HI .853 9.040
-46.716 9.538
GRPPH 93
ROUND
T T
2GO.OO 300.00
PPH X MR
35D.QQ
MOQ.CO
MOT.DQ
-------
o
o
CD
O
cu
rr.
CflRBGN
HEflRT CGND. MILD
INCflPfl£ITY = angina pectoris,
arrythmia, coma o:
convulsions
CURVE
YL
fl
-73.H67
-77.115
YU
B
14.620
1H.7H2
-97.H08 17.953
GRRPH 94
ROUND 2
EG .00
—r—• 1—— 1—
1QQ.QQ 15Q.C3 50Q.CO
DQSflGE
I T , I I I !
mfir^n rvr* *3f~t\ Ptrs t>'s,n r "^ u^rn PO r*^"\
SUU «U«J 3OU«UU liijJ.L.J HQ'J .U^J •• 1.
J-7--VJJ V UO
:) H A "A
-------
CflRBGN MONOXIDE
HEflRT CQND. MILD
1
2GQ.CO
DISABILITY = throbbing headache,
, confusion,
irritability,
dizziness, and
increase 'in dyspnea
CURVE fl
B
YL -33.994 7.218
X -61.191 12.292
YLi -91.828 17.684
GRflPH 95
ROUND'
sso.rn 300.00
PPM X MR
MOQ.CO
1
M'^Q.CQ
-------
CflRBGN MONOXIDE
HERRT CQND.
DISCOMFORT = mild headache, erroi
in cognitive f-jr.^-.ic
150,CO 200
DQSRGE
CURVE fl
B
YL -27.933 6-536
X -35.215 7.676
YU -45.736 9.368
GRflPH 95
ROUND
30Q.OQ.
PPM X HR
350 .CO
MOO.00
-------
CfiRBQN MCNCiXlDE
RT CGND, SEV
INCflPflCITY = aruina pectcris,
100.00 ISQ.K) cC
D35RGL
fl
rania, ccr.a
ccnvu.Isior.s
B
-26.195 5.534
-27.904 5.564
YU -39.124 7.381
GRRP
97
ROUND
350.00
MOO .C
:?M V l.i
! 11 i A I IS
-------
o.
o
o
a?
CHHB3N KGWI
HEHRT COHO. SEV
DISOTIITY = t]
CURVE fl
confusion,
irritatili-y,
dizziness, and
increase in dysrr.ea
B
-28.788 6.521
-31.753 6.708
-38.739 7.668
98
ROUND
350 -CO
SO.ca
«. -0,
-------
DISCOMFORT = *iic
tive *vjnc":"?c
CURVE fl
YU
B.
YL -20=885 5.562
-36.H63 8.626
-49.596 10.802
GRnPH 99
ROUND
•">'}*! V t'f?
fill 7« : i! \
SGQ.GO
-------
HRY FEVER. SINUS
IKCRPflCITY- coaa ,r oonvulsic::.
s'
.GO
100.00
-------
C. - _,£ -^il"- ^-^ .
f
R
RfS:' IV ,"
UVJ^JJ
CO .00
'. -\ ;"";'.• -DC!
Y-inr t--t~«.':
-------
> i.—!*,? r~^-\ti'"!"
hH r raver,
fv! :-
i ^ ^ v j
DlSCGHrGRT = -1. he^-r.*. e:
* * • • .^
fl
B
-30.0H6 .6.822
^^'* 7.989
11.152
RQUND
M^;; ."0
-------
HRY FEVER, SINUS
DISCOMFORT = a<
O.
o
CD
R
-30.QH6
-) UiU
/ > : - <
6.822
7.999
i1.152
. .
r'Pil X iliX
-------
IfCflPflCITY = respirator-
o.
UJ
L-..
U_
cu
j- --
./
B
-35.128 6-SOb
.
1'.. J »•<-.'.!
-39=925
-34.326 6.389
7.102 ,
103
RCUND
M3Q.CO
-------
CflRBGN
INFLUENZfl
DISflBILITY = throbbing headache
CURVE fl
YU
1 T'T'T t ,<-'"' " - *-/
-"•i — '-^-yj-j-ijyj
diazir^ss, increas;
in
B
YL -29.939 6.29';
-H2.289 '8.343
-48.537 9.ITS
GRflPH 104
ROUND
3GQ.DO
400.CC
PPM X HR
-------
CflRBSN MONOXIDE
INFLUENZfl
DISCOMFORT = mild headache, errci
in cognitive fvinetic
CURVE
YL -22.040
YU
300 .CO
-30.2HO
-47.795
B
5.168
6.570
9.834
GR9PH 105
ROUND
f'Pfl X HR
-------
UP RESP INFECT
INCPPflCITY = cc.-a or convulsions
o
V
r.J
°
! q?
o
o
YL -46.067
50.00
-40.818
YU -40.757
B
8.982
7.540
7.246
GR9PH 106
ROUND 2 ;
250,03 300-DO
PPM X HR
3SO.CQ
MQQ.OQ
-------
WQX IDE
UP RESP INFECT
O-t
o
CM
DISABILITY = thro-i-.~ >eaia:he,
CURVE R
YU
irritability,
B
YL -36.184 7.586
X -46.105 9.062
-50.686 9.578
GRflPH 107
RQUND
.00
!DO-M ^QSflGE
PPM X HR
35Q.00
MCI -CX3
-------
CPRBQN NGNGXIDE
UP RESP INFECT
DISCOMFORT = mile he^ehe, errcrs
n
f-ir.c~.ion
&QO
50.00
100.00
CURVE fl
YL -25.651
X
-36.577
YU -H8.990 9. BO
GRRPH 108
ROUND
ICQ-DO £00.00
DGSPGE
er,o,oa soa .00 SSD.CQ
PPM X HR
i '
MOD .00
,»
-------
CflRBON MONOXIDE
flSTHNfl
INCPPflCITY = asthmatic attack,
coina or convulsions
o.
o
C5
07
CM
B
-43.772 8.495
-43.045 7.937
YU -60.734
10.738
GRRPH 109
ROUND
i r
2SO.CQ l^G3.
-------
CflREGN MONOXIDE
flSTHWfl
DISABILITY =
50.00
100.00
ISO.00 200.00
DGSfiGE
CURVf
YL
YU
-56.996
-65.230
-69.775
throbbing headache,
confusion,
irritability,
dizziness
B
11.768
12.762
13.125
GRflPH 110
ROUND 2
1 1 1 1 1
.Cn 300.00 350.00 MOO .00 M50.0Q 500 .t
PPM X MR
-------
°—1
O
CO
O
CU
CflRBGM
flSTHNfl
DISCOMFORT = mild headache, erroi
in cognitive functic
CURVE R
YL
YU
-75.795
B
-30.409 7.049
-H6.106 9.881
15.507
GRRPH 111
ROUND
60.00
1QC.OQ
ICO .CO
200 .CD
2cQ.C\!
300 .DO
x HR
3SQ.DQ
-------
o
O?
• J
'.U
i U
r T"
.3
CPRBQN
VIRflL BRONCHITIS
INCflPflCITY = respiratory failure,
coma, convulsions
YL -35.760
I
EQ.QO
-38.525
YU -38.228
GRRPH 112
10Q.CQ
ISO.CO
2GQ.CO
gr a ,"'0 ?HO .
fV'M X MR
M
B
7.041
7.150
6.818
ROUND 2
-------
' --- *
LJ
CE
rc
u_
a
OJ
o.
o
6Q.QO
VIRflL BRQNCHITIS
DISABILITY = throttiMj headache,
15D.CK) 2QQ.03
DGSflf.E
CURVE fl
YL -35.798
-H3.245
YU -56.040
ccnfustcr,,
zzr.^s?:, increase
in dyspt>?.
B
7.53D
8.5S7
GRflPH 113
ROUND
S5Q.CQ 3QQ.DQ
PPM X HR
3oO.DQ
MQQ.CQ
-------
CflRBQN flQNQXIDE
VIRflL BRONCHITIS
DISCGftFQRT = mild headache, errors
in cogTiitive function
CURVE fl
B
YL -27.743 6.H55
-HI.050 8.88M
YU -63.642 12.966
GRflPH 114
ROUND
ECO.13 ?C1.CO
PPM X HF<
c r« p -N
N* O • V- *J
130.01 2CO.OCS
DQSRGE
3oO
MOQ.CQ
-------
CflP.BCN IWH3XIDE
• I
BflCT. FNEUMGNIfl
INCflPflCITY = respiratory failure,
coma, cor.Vdlsions
1GO.CG
13Q.CO 2QQ.C3
D3SHGE
CURVE fl B
YL -50.179 9.907
X -93.962 17.836
YU -74.892 13.703
GRhPH 115
ROUND
CTpM V
i n i A
350 .CO
MOO.CO
-------
CPREQN MONOXIDE
o_
o
o
«?
BRCT. PNEUNGNIfl
DISRBILITY =
throbbing headache,
confusion,
irritability,
dizziness, increase,
in dyspnea
CURVE R B
YL -31-153 6.6H7
X -H8.316 9-697
YU -75.386 1M.411
GRflPH 116
RQUND . 2
DGSRGE
PPfi X
350.00
•JCO.t
M50 .CO
-------
MONOXIDE
BflCT. PNEUMONIA
DISCQMFQRT
= mild headache, errors
in cognitive functicr
•-Q
o I
£20
CURVE fl
B
YL -24.113 5.823
X -45.625 9.960
YU -61.423 12..833
GRRPH 117
ROUND 2
i
GQ.OQ
1QQ.CQ
CO 2QQ.Q3
DQSP.GE
rn 30Q.D3 350.CO
VPM x HR .
.CO
-------
CPRBQN MONOXIDE
CHRONIC RESP DIS
INCflPflCITY = respiratory failure
coma, convulsions
1GO.OO £00-ID
D3SRGE
CURVE fl
YL -30.370
X -53.669
YU -58.70H
B
6.083
10.239
10.661
GRRPH 118
ROUND
30D.K3
FPH X HR
35Q.CQ
MOD-
bCi
-------
o
CJ
CflRBGN N3NQXIDE
CHRONIC RESP DIS
CO .CD
DISR0ILITY = throbbing headache,
confusion,
irritability,
dizziness, and .
increase in dypsnea
CURVE R
YL -35.548
X -42.256
YU -62.152
B
7.514
8.487
11.956
GRflPH 119
ROUND
SOD
PPM X HR
-------
CRRPGN MONOXIDE
CHRONIC RESP DIS
DISCOMFORT = mild headache, errors
in cognitive function
£,00
CURVE fl
B
YL -22.570 5.H35
X -39.212 8.587
YU -H2.626 8.856
GRRPH 120
ROUND
£CH.CO
T*~i r1
t •'.';».! «
MCD .CO
• • > « V I ' ^
rfi'l A hi'\
-------
CflRBON MONOXIDE
M CHRN QBST LUNG
INCRPflCITY = respiratory failure,
coma or ccnvul:-.-.is
CJ
O I
GOO
.00
YL -HO.741
YU -50.154
MSQ.CO
1GQ.GO
-------
CflRBQN MQWQXIDE
c?
a
CJ
EO.CO
1CO.
M CHRM QPST LUNS
D^
G
3 .G3
DISflBILITY = throbbing headache..
confusion, irritatn ii
dizziness
CURVE fl
YL -H3.082
X -55.582
YU -63.205
B
8.972
11.015
12.030
GRRPH 122
ROUND
PP
. 3CQ.DQ
X HR
H5Q.C
1
MOO.C
-------
nOMQXIDE
M CHRN QBST LUNS
DISCQnFQRT = mild headache, erro:
in cognitive func-.ic
CURVE fl
YU
B
YL -19.332 4.615
-26.065 5.699
-45.P9 9.342
GRflPH 123
ROUND 2
FPH X HR '
MGO.0
-------
CflRBQM
5 CHRiN Q0ST LUNG
CO.GO
ICO.CO
INCflPflCITY = respiratory failure,
coina, convulsions
CURVE
YL -40.404
B
8.264
X -57.436 11.147
YU -55.758 10.433
GRRPH 124
ROUND
«Cfl 500.00
PPM X HR
350,CO
.CO
.-.Q .en
-------
u
CGU
CflREQN MONOXIDE
S CHRN GBST LUNG
DISABILITY =
GO .00
1G3.GO
icn .00
2CQ,
DQSP.GE
CURVE
YL
X
YU
-67.772
throbbing headache,
confusion, irritabil-
ity, dizziness, and
increase in dyspnea
B
-38.301 8.397
-39.583 8.088
13.144
GRRPH 125
ROUND
200.00
x MR
—I—
sso.ca
MQQ.00
MSQ.OQ
-------
CflRPON MONOXIDE
S CHRN QBST.LUNG
DISCOMFORT = mild headache,
6rrors ir. coPTii". i.1-" -
function
CURVE fl
YL -20.169
X -33.944
YU -50.196
B
5.117
7.715
i
10.594 !
GRRPH 126
ROUND 2 i
160.00 SOD .00
DOSflGE
8GQ.CO 300.00
FfJH X MR
MOD.00
M5Q.CD
-------
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THE RESOURCES AGENCY
'
f^^l ;vi$ ll f^ ff"
P 1
A(R RESOURCES BOARD
MARCH 1975
-------
APPENDIC C
HUMAN HEALTH DAMAGES FROM MOBILE SOURCES AIR POLLUTION
Second Round
RAW DATA
Prepared Under Contract No. 68-01-1889
for the
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
by
Steve Leung
Principal Investigator
Elliot Goldstein, M.D.
Co-Investigator
Norman Dalkey, Ph.D.
Project Consultant
March 1975
CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD
1709-11th Street
Sacramento, California 9581^
-------
TABLE Oi-' CONTENT
OXIUAIIT
A. liorrnal .... ........................................... l_'t
B. Cdi l.dr<-;n ......... . .......... . ..................... '. . «,_,S
1 ' . Old Age ............................................. V- 1 T
D. Heart Condition, Mild ............................... 13- 16
E. Heart Condition, Severe ....................... . ..... 17-20
F. Hay Fever, Sinusiti s ................................ 21 -.•''(
(i . Influenza .............. ;..' .......................... 2lj>-,".'8
H. Upper Respiratory Infection ................... . ..... 29-32
1 . Asthma .............................................. 33-36
I . Acute Viral Bronchitis .......... . ................... 93-96
K.. Acute Bacterial Pneumonia ........................... 97-100
L. Chronic Respiratory Diseases ........................ 101-10*t
M. Mild Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease ............... 105-108
M. Severe Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease ............. 109-112
111 . CARBON MONOXIDE
A. Normal .............................................. 113-116
B. Children ............................................ 1 17-120
'.'. Old Age ............................................. 121-1?'t
D. Heart Condition, Mild ............................. • -125-128
E. Heart .'ondition, Severe ...... . ...................... 1?9-1"/>2
I1'. Hay .Wvrr, Sinusi tii-; ........ ........... 1 ........... 133-136
Ci . I nf.l.uruv.a ................. .
II. Upper Kespiratory Infection
I . Asthma ................................... ; ......... i^-i/ip,
.1. Acute Viral Bronchitis ................... ............ I'lO-r,/
K. Acuto Bac terial. i'neumoni.-i ........................... V >'>- I'.f.
1.. Chronic K -r.piratory Diseases ..................... . . . .i'jy_-)f,i ;
M. Mild Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease .............. 16'1-lb't
N. Severe Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease ......... ••••165-168
-------
CALIF AKR
POLLUTANT CODE » i
PO°ULATION CATEGORY CODE
i'
PES CENT OF POP AFFECTED
POLLUTANT B OXIDANT
CATEGORY « NORMAL
ROUND = 2
DOCTOR
2
3
A
5
7
e
9
10
11
. 12
13
1*
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST QUAP
THIRD QUAS
ARIT* M£A\
STANDARD DEV
INCAPACITY
YL x
0,40
0.30
0.20
0.20
0.10
0.30
0.30
0.05
0.00
0.10
0.40
0,00
0.00
0.15
0.17
0.05
0.30
0.18
O.U
0.50
0.40
0.40
0.30
0,20
0.50
0.40
0.10
0,20
0.30
0.50
0,10
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.20
0.^0
0.31
0.1*
YU
0,80
0.50
0.60
0.50
0.30
0.70
0.50
0.20
o.*o
0.50
0.60
0.20
0.40
0.30
0.50
0.30
0.60
0,*6
0.18
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0,0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0,0
0.0
DISABILITY
YL X
0.20
0.20
0.10
0.10
0,05
0.18
0.10
0.05
0.00
0.10
0,10
o.oo
0,00
0.05
0.10
0.05
0.10
0.09
0,07
0.30
0.30
0,20
0.20
0.10
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.20
0.05
0.20
0.10
0.20
0.10
0.30
0.20
0.08
YU
0.40
0.^0
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.42
0.30
0.20
0.40
0.40
0.30
0.15
0.40
0.15
0.35
0.20
0.40
0.32
0.10
T R
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
• 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0,0 0,0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
DISCOMFORT
YL x
0.05
0.10
0,05
0.10
0,10
0.06
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.10
0.00
0,00
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.10
0.04
0.04
0.10
0.20
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.10
0,00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0,05
0,05
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.20
0.13
0.0s
YU i
0.20 •
0.30 0
0.20
0.25 '•
0.30
0.14
0.10
0.20
0.40
0.40 . ••
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.15
0.20 .'1
0.15 r. .
0.30
0.22
0.10
e-
n
n
n
n
:1
. r\
r\
n
n
n
n
.1
.1
n
• . "i
• . n
. 0
* *i
-------
CALIF ARB
POLLUTANT CODE * 1
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE * i
i"
PER CENT OF POP AFFECTED a 10
.POLLUTANT « OXIOANT
CATEGORY » NORMAL
ROUND = 2
DOCTOR
2
3
4
s
7
8
9
' 10
11
. -12
13
14
15
16
MEOIAXJ
FIRST QUAR
THIRD QUA=
ARITH MEAN
STANDARD CEV
INCAPACITY
YL x
0,60
0.40
o.*o
O.*0
0.25
0,40
0.60
0.*5
0.40
0.4Q
0.60
0.55
0.4Q
0.60
0.4Q
0.40
0.60
0,*6
0.11
0.80
0.60
0.80
0.80
0.60
0.60
0,80
0.60
0.63
0.60
0.90
0.75
0.60
1.00
0,77
0«60
0.80
0.73
0.13
YU
1.00
1.20
1.20
1.10
1.00
0.80
1.00
o.^s
1.20
o.eo
1.20
0.95
0.80
1.20
1.00
0.95
1.20
1,03
0.16
T
16
10
12
28
24
24
20
17
a
18
15
24
24
36
19.0
15.0
24.0
19.7
7.6
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISABILITY
YL X
0.30
0.30
0.30
0.25
0.25
0.30
0.20
0.25
0.20
0.30
O.*0
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.25
0.20
0.30
0.26
0.06
0.50
0.50
0.60
0.40
0.30
0.50
0,40
0.40
0.42
0.50
0.60
0.40
0.40
0,30
0.41
0.40
0.50
0.44
0.09
YU
.0.70
0.70
0.90
0.60
0.75
0.70
0.60
0.65
0.60
0.70
0.90
0.55
0.60
0.45
0.67
0.60
0.70
0.66
. 0.11
T
12
7
8
18
16
12
10
16
6
•18
14
12
8
12
12.0
8.0
16.0
12.1
4.0
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
o.o
0.0
0.0
DISCOMFORT
YL x
0.20
0.20
0,10
0.10
0.20
0.10
0.10
0.25
0.05
0.20
0.00
0.15
0.20
0.10
0.13
0.10
0.20
0.14
0.07
0.30
0.30
0.30
0,20
0.4Q
0.30
0.20
0.40
0.20
0.40
0.20
0.30
0.30
0.25
0.30
0.20
0.30
0.29
0.07
YU
0.40
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.55
0.45
0.4Q
0.55
0.40
0.60
0.4Q
0.40
0.40
0.40
0.40
0.40
0.55
0.46
0.08
T 5
6 0
3 n
f n
Ifc n
6 n
' '. n
~. 1
i : «
t '1
!<-. .1
1C 'I
\f. n
«• 0
n
n . ' 0 . n
h . .) . n
1 .- . '. . "
* . - • '• . "
4 . T. o . n
-------
CALIF
POLLUTANT CODE • i
POPULATION CATEGORY coot = i
«'
PER CENT or POP'AFFECTED = 50
PAOC
POLLUTANT • OXIDANT
CATEGORY « NORMAL
ROUND • 2
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
• 7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST QUAR
THIRD Oi'AR
ARIT* *EAS
STANDARD CEV
INCAPACITY
YL x
D.SO
0.60
0.80
0.80
0.60
0.60
1.20
0.80
0.82
0.6o
0.80
0.75
0,60
0.90
0,80
0.60
0.80
0.7&
0.16
1.00
1.00
1.20
1.20
1.00
1,00
1.40
. 1.00
1,15
1.00
1.10
1.05
* 0,80
1.20
1,02
1.00
1.20
1.03
0.1*
YU
1.20
1.80
1.60
1.45
1.30
1.40
1.60
1.40
1.50
1.40
1.40
1.30
1.00
1.60
1,40
1.30
1.60
1.42
0.20
T
16
10
18
32
24
24
24
17
10
24
15
24
24
36
24.0
16,0
24.0
21.3
7.5
R
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
o.o
0,0
o.o
0,0
DISABILITY
YL *
0«60
0.50
0.40
0«60
0.40
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.50
0.50
• 0.40
o.eo
0.50
o.*o
0.50
0.49
0=12
V.BO
0.80
0.80
0.90
0.80
0.80
0.60
0.60
0.80
0.70
0.70
0.80
0.60
1.00
0.80
0.70
0.80
0.76
9.12
YU
1*00
1.10
1.20
1.20
1.20
1.10
0.80
0.90
1,20
0.90
0.90
1.00
0.80
1.30
1.05
0.90
1.20
1.04
O.lT
T
12
2
12
20
4
12
1
2*
8
' . 4
12
12
6
2
10.0
4.0
12.0
9.4
6.9
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
o.o
0.0
0.0
0*0
DISCOMFORT
YL x
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.40
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.40
0.50
0.10
0.10
0.20
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.40
0.29
0.14
0*60
0.50
0.40
0.60
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.40
0.90
O.?0
0.30
0.30
0.40
0.60
0.50
0.4Q
0.60
0.51
0.15
YU T ,3
o««o 6 n
0.70 2 0
0.60 6 n
O.RO is o
O.PO » fl
0.7o u n
0.6C 1 0
0.71 1 0
l.?o - n
O.so o n
O.S1) * 0
0.59 • 0
o . * -• : ? o
o,%o f o
o.?: ».o o.o
o . * • ? . o o.o
' . •• : - . •> o.o
C . ' ' - . • * . 0
0 • . * • . - ". • 0
-------
CALIF ARR
POLLUTANT CODE » 1
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE • i
;'
PER CENT OF POP AFFECTED a 90
PAOC
POLLUTANT *> OXIDANT
CATEGORY o NORMAL
ROUND » 2
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST oi'As
TrIPD QUA?
ARITH MEAN
STANDARD DEV
INCAPACITY
YL X
1*30
1.00
4.00
2.70
0.80
1.10
0.80
0.60
1.60
0.8Q
1.40
1.20
0.6Q
1.80
1.15
0.8o
1.60
1.41
0.93
1.50
1.40
6,00
3.10
1.20
1.80
1.00
1.00
1.80
1.00
1,60
1.50
1.00
2.00
1.50
1.00
1.30
1.85
1.32
YU
1.70
2.00
8.00
3.40
1.60
2.50
1,20
1.40
2.00
1.20
1.80
1.80
1.40
2.20
1.80
1.40
2.20
2.30
1.74
T
76
34
96
7
16
12
4
24
10
72
12
24
24
12
20.0
12.0
34.0
30.2
29.3
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISABILITY
YL *
1.20
0.80
2.00
1.20
0.60
0.60
0,60
0.40
0.60
0.60
1.00
0.80
0.60
0.90
O.BO
0.60
1.00
0.86
0.40
1.30
1.00
3.00
1.90
1.00
1.40
0.80
0.70
1.00
0.70
1.20
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.30
1.21
0.60
YU
1.50
1.40
4.00
2.60
1.40
1.90
1.00
1.00
1.40
0.80
1.40
1.20
1.40
1.40
1.40
1.20
1.50
1.60
0.81
T
2*
2
72
5
4
12
1
24
8
. 4
12
12
6
2
7.0
4.0
12.0
13.4
18.4
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISCOMFORT
YL x
1,00
0.60
0.60
0.40
0.40
0.50
0.40
0.20
0.60
0.50
0,40
0.20
0.20
0.60
0.45
0,40
0.60
0.47
0.21
1.10
O.BO
0,60
1.00
0.80
0.80
0.60
0.40
1.00
0.70
0.60
0,40
0,60
0,30
0,80
0,60
0,80
0,74
0.21
YU T
1.40 *8
1.00 2
1.00 12
l.SO 3
l.?1 4
1.11 12
0.1", 1
O.M 1
1.0 8
O.*rt 4
C.»i 6
C,M 4
l.\l 2
:.n 2
:.n 4.0
t . > 1 ? . 0
; . > i 8.0
. \ 7.8
I.*"* 12.1
V
B
0
0
0
0
0
0
n
0
0
1 ft
0
0
0
0
O.o
0,0
0,0
0,0
0.0
-------
CAL1* AR8
PAGE
POLLUTANT CODE
POLLUTANT o OXIOANT
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE
«'
PER CENT OF POP AFFECTED
INCAPACITY
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
e
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
MEDIAN
FIPST OL'i =
THIPO oiu3
APITn yf.ik.
STANOAPQ CSV
YL
0.5Q
0.20
0.20
0.3Q
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.05
0.00
0.20
0.20
0.00
0.00
0'. 10
0.20
0.05
0.20
0.17
0. It
X
0.60
0,40
0,40
0.40
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.1C
0.20
0,30
0.40
0.10
» 0.20
0.30
0.30
0 .20
0.40
0,31
0-14
» 2
• 0
YU
0.90
0.60
0,60
0.50
0,30
0.50
0.50
0,20
0,40
0.40
0,60
0.20
0.40
0.40
0.45
0.40
0,60
0,46
0.18
CATEGORY » CHILDREN
DISABILITY
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0,0
0.0
0.0
R
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
YL
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.20
0.10
0.10
0.20
0.05
0,00
0.20
0.10
0,00
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.05
0,20
0,11
0.09
X
U.40
0.30
0.20
0.30
0.20
0.20
U.30
0.10
9.10
0.30
9.20
0.15
0.20
0.10
0.20
0.15
0,30
0.22
U.Q9
POUND •
YU
0.60
0.40
0.40
0.40
0.30
0.30
0.40
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.40
0.15
0.40
0.20
0.40
0.30
0.40
0.35
0.12
2
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0,0
0.0
0.0
DISCOMFORT
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
"o
0
Q
0
0
0
0.0
o.o
0.0
0.0
0.0
YL
0.10
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.10
0.05
0.00
0,00
0,00
0.20
0,00
0.00
0,00
0,05
0,00
0.00
0,05
0.04
0,06
X
0.20
0,20
0.10
0.10
0.20
0.10
0.10
0.05
0.10
0.30
0.10
0.05
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.20
0.13
0.07
YU T
0.40 0
0.40 0
0.20 0
0 • ? 0
0.30 c-
0.15 0
0 . ? 0 0
0.10 0
0.30 0
0.40 0
0.20 'T
0,15 1
0.20 0
0 . ? 0
0.20 0.--
0 . ? 0 0.0
0 . .10 0 . ':
0.?4 D.-.
0.10 0. '
4
»
r>
n
n
n
n
n
0
n
n
n.
n
n
n
0
.- . A
•'i i n
' . 0
^
t •">
-------
CALIF ARB
PAGE
POLLUTANT CODE • 1
POLLUTANT • OXIDANT
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE <
4 '
PER CENT OF POP AFFECTED '
INCAPACITY
DOCTOR YL X
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
'12
13
14
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST QUAR
TH. IPO QCA=
ARITH MEAN
STANDARD OEV
0«70
0.60
1.40
0.45
0.20
0.20
0.60
0.30
0.20
0.50
0.60
0.70
0.00
0.40
0,»7
0.20
0.6C
0.*9
0.3*
0.9o
0.80
1.60
0.70
0.40
0.40
0.70
0.80
0.60
0.60
0.80
0.90
6.40
0.60
0.70
0.60
0.80
0.73
0.30
* 2
• 10
YU
1.20
1.00
1.80
1.00
0.60
0.60
0.80
1.40
1,00
0.70
1.00
1.10
0.80
0.80
1,00
0.80
1.10
0.99
0.33
CATEGORY » CHILDREN
DISABILITY
T R YL *
96 6
24 0
96 0
5 0
4 0
24 0
4 0
24 0
8 0
72 0
24 0
24 0
24 0
12 0
24.0 0.0
8.0 0,0
24.0 0,0
31,5 0.0
32.2 0.0
0«50
0.40
0.60
0.30
0.20
0.20
0.50
0.10
0,05
0.40
0.4Q
0.30
• o.oo
0.30
0.30
0.20
0,40
0.30
0.18
U.60
0.60
0.80
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.60
0.40
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.50
0.4Q
0,50
0.50
0.40
0.60
0.51
u,i3
ROUND »
YU
0*90
0.80
1.00
0,70
0.50
0.50
0.70
0.80
0.80
0.60
0,80
0.70
0.40
0.70
0.70
0*60
0.80
0.71
. 0.16
2
T R
8 0
2 0
24 0
4 0
2 0
24 0
.2 0
24 0
8 0
4 0
24 0 .
12 0
6 0
2 0
7.0 0.0
2.0 0.0
24.0 0.0.
10,4 0,0
9.4 o.O
DISCOMFORT
YL x
0.20
0.20
0.20
0,10
0.20
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.10
0.15
0.10
0.20
0.15
0.05
0.30
0.30
0.40
0.30
0.40
0,20
0.20
0.15
0.35
0.40
0.30
0,30
0.30 «
0.20
0.30
0.20
0.35
0.29
O.OB
YU
0.40
0.60
O.frO
0.40
0.50
0.30
0.30
0.30
0.55
0.60
0.45
0.40
0.40
0.45
0.42
0.40
0.55
0,45
0.11
T P
»
6 n
3 ft
6 0
I?. n
8 "
* ft
•; n
3 n
l.: n
IH n
10 n
12 n
6 n
6 0
7.0 O.n
6.0 0.0
1 2 . r. o.n
e . ; " . i
it . ; 0 » <1
-------
CALIF ARR
PAOC
POLLUTANT CODE • 1
POLLUTANT • OX1DANT
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE •
PER CENT OF POP AFFECTED •
DOCTOR
2
c
3
•3
_
5
7
8
9
10
I v
11
•12
* *"
13
14
i 5
i •*
16
MEDIAN
FIRST QUAR
THIPD QUAR
ARITH MEAN
STANDARD CEV
i 2
i 50
INCAPACITY
YL
0.80
0.60
0.90
0.55
0.50
0.50
1.20
* * w
0.40
0.80
0,80
0.60
0.75
0.50
0.80
0.67
0.50
0.80
0.69
0.21
X
1.00
1.00
1.20
0,80
0.90
0.75
1.40
0.70
1.10
1.00
0.80
1.00
0.80
*
1.05
1.00
0.80
1.05
0.96
0.19
YU
1.20
1.40
1.50
1.30
1.20
1.10
1.60
1.15
1.40
1.20
1.00
1.30
1.10
1.40
1.25
1.15
1.40
1.27
0.17
CATEGOH
T R
36 0
10 0
18 0
28 0
24 0
30 0
20 0
24 0
12 0
18 0
24 0
24 0
24 0
30 0
24.0 0.0
18.0 0.0
28.0 0.0
23.0 0,0
7.0 0.0
:T » CNILUI
iC.ni
DISABILITY
VI *
YL
0.70
0.40
0.60
0.45
0.30
0.35
0.60
0.30
0.60
0.60
0.20
0.50
0.50
0.30
0.47
0.30
0.60
0.47
0.17
0.90
0.80
0.80
0.65
0.60
0.60
1.00
0.45
0.95
0.80
0.60
0.70
0.70
0.50
0.70
0.60
0.80
0.72
0.16
ROUND *
YU
1.20
1.20
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.85
1.20
0.95
1.25
1.00
0.80
0.85
1.00
0.75
1.00
0.85
1.20
1.00
0.16
2
T R
12 0
7 0
12 0
18 0
16 0
24 0
10 0
15 0
12 0
. 18 0
18 0
12 0
8 0
10 0
12.0 0.0
10.0 0.0
1S.O 0.0
13.7 0,0
4.7 0.0
DISCOMFORT
YL *
0.50
0.30
0.40
0.25
0.20
0.20
0.40
0.05
0.20
0.30
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.15
0.25
0.20
0,30
0.26
0,12
0.70
0.60
0.60
0.55
0.40
0.30
0.60
0.10
0.50
0.50
0.40
0.45
0.50
0.30
0.50
0.40
0.60
0.46
0.16
YU T «
1.00 6
-------
CALIF AHR
POLLUTANT CODE • 1
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE • 2
PER CENT OF POP AFFECTED « 90
/
'
POLLUTANT • OXIOANT
CATEGORY « CHILDREN
p»oe
ROUND = 2
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
6
9
10
11
•12
13
14
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST QUAR
THIPO QUAR
ARITH MEAN
STANDARD DEV
INCAPACITY
YL X
1.40
1.00
4.00
1.70
0.70
0.80
0.80
0.30
1.20
0.9Q
1.20
1.20
0.6o
1.30
1.10
0.80
1.40
1.26
0.89
1.50
1.40
5.00
2.10
1.00
1.40
0.90
0.80
1.60
1.00
1.40
1.40
* 1.00
2.00
1.40
1.00
1.60
1,61
1,05
YU T R
1.60 96 6
2.00 24 0
• 6.00 96 0
2.60 5 0
1.40 16 . 0
1,90 24 0
1.00 4 0
1.20 24 0
2,00 8 0
1.10 72 0
1,60 12 0
1.60 24 0
1.40 24 0
2.20 12 0
1.60 24,0 0,0
1,40 12.0 0.0
2.00 24,0 0,0
1.97 31.5 0.0
1.24 31.9 0.0
DISABILITY
YL X
N
1.10
0.60
2.00
1.00
0.60
0.50
0.70
0.20
0.60
0.80
0,80
0,70
0.60
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.80
0.79
0,41
1*20
1.00
2,50
1.40
0.90
0.70
0.80
0.40
1.00
0,90
1.00
0.90
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.90
1.00
1.05
0.48
YU
1.40
1.40
3.00
2.10
1.20
1.10
0.90
0.80
1.40
1.00
1.20
1.10
1.40
1.20
1.20
1.10
1.40
1.37
. 0.56
T R
8 0
2 0
48 0
* 0
4 0
24 0
2 0
24 0
8 0
4 0
12 0
12 0
6 0
3 0
7.0 0.0
4.0 0.0
12.0 0.0
11.5 0.0
12.8 0.0
DISCOMFORT
YL X
0.90
0.60
0.80
0.20
0.40
0.10
0.60
0.10
0.60
0.80
0.30
0.30
0.20
0.60
0.50
0.20
0.60
0.46
0.27
1*00
1.00
0.90
0.70
0.80
0,60
0.70
0.20
1.00
0,90
0.50
0.50
0.60
0.80
0.75
0.60
. 0.90
0.73
0.23
YU
1«20
1.40
, 1.00
1.40
1.20
1.10
O.PO
0.30
1.40
1.00
0.80
0.70
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.80
1.20
1.02
0.31
T %
3 0
2 ft
12 0
2 n
4 "
24 0
1 n
5 o
a o
4 ' 0
6 0
4 0
2 ft
2 0
4.0 0.0
2.0 0,0
6.0 0«"
5.6 0.0
6.0 0.0
-------
CALIF AMB
POLLUTANT CODE • 1
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE » 3
«"
PER CENT OF POP*AFFECTED » 0
PAGE
POLLUTANT o OXIDANT
CATEGORY • OLD AGE
ROUND
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
:i2
13
14
15
16
MEDIAN
FISST QUAR
THIRD QUAP
ARIT* MEAN
STANDARD OEV
INCAPACITY
YL x
o.3o-
0.30
0.20
0.30
0.10
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
0.15
0.25
0,00
0,20
0.10
0.20
0.10
0.30
0.16
0.11
0.40
0.40
0,40
0«40
0,20
0.40
0.30
0. IS
0,20
0.20
0,35
0,10
0.40
0.25
0.32
0.20
0.40
0.30
0.11
YU
0.50
0.50
0.60
0.50
0.30
0.50
O.«0
0.20
0.40
0,30
0.45
0.20
0.60
0.30
0.42
0.30
0.50
0.41
0.13
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0,0
o.o
R
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISABILITY
YL *
0.10
0.20
0.10
0.20
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.05
0.00
0.10
0.10
0.00
'0.10
0,05
0.10
0.05
0.10
0.09
0.06
0.20
0.30
0.20
0.30
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.10
9.10
0,20
0.20
0.10
9.30
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.07
YU
0*30
0.40
0.40
0.40
0.30
0.30
0.30
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.20
0.50
0.30
0.30
0.25
0.40
0.31
0.09
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
o.o
0.0
DISCOMFORT
R YL x
0
0
0
0
0.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o.o
0.0
0.0
0.0
o.o
0.00
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.10
0,00
0,00
0.05
0.05
0,03
0.00
0.10
0.04
0.04
0*10
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.10
0.05
0.10
0.05
0.10
0.20
0.10
0.10
0.15
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.20
0.13
0.05
YU
0.20
0.30
0.30
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.20
0.10
0.20
0.25
0,20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.25
0.21
0.06
T »
0 0
0 0
0 n
0 0
0 0
n o
n n
o o
o n
0 o
0 0
n o
0 n
0
0 . A 0 . n
0.0 0.0
0 . '• 0.0
0. ': .1.0
0 • • > •"> « 0
-------
APB
10
POLLUTANT CODE • 1
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE » 3
PER CENT or POP AFFECTED « 10
POLLUTANT «• OXIDANT
CATEGORY • OLD AGE
POUND • 2
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
• ;12
13
1*
13
16
MEDIAN
FIRST OUAR
THIRD QUAR
ARITH MEAN
STANDARD OEV
INCAPACITY
YL X
0,60'
0.40
0.40
0.50
0.50
0.30
o.*o
0.20
0.60
0.30
0.40
O.*0
0.4o
1.20
0,40
0.4Q
0.50
0.47
0.24
0.80
0.80
0.60
0,70
0,70
0,50
0.60
0.55
1.00
0.50
0.70
0.60
^
0.60
1.45
0.70
0.60
o.eo
0,74
0.25
YU
1,00
1.20
1.20
0.95
1.00
0.70
0.80
1.20
1.40
0.90
1.00
0.80
o.flo
1.95
1.00
0.80
1.20
1.06
0.32
T
36
10
18
32
24
30
36
20
24
24
20
24
48
24
24.0
20.0
32.0
26.4
9.4
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISABILITY
YL *
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.45
0.40
0.30
0.20
o.io
0.40
0.20
0.20
0.30
0.30
0.35
0.30
0.20
0.40
0.31
0.11
0.70
0.60
0.60
0.65
0.70
0.45
0.40
0.25
0.80
0.40
0.50
0.45
0.50
0.60
0.55
0.45
0.65
0.54
0.15
YU
0.90
1.00
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.55
0.60
0.65
1.20
0.60
0.80
0.65
0.7o
0.90
0.85
0.65
0.90
0.80
0.19
T
30
7
12
32
24
30
24
15
12
18
18
24
24
48
24.0
*15.0
30.0
22.7
10.4
R
0.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
o.o
0.0
DISCOMFORT
YL x
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.10
0,30
0.10
0,20
0,05
0.00
0.20
0.10
0.05
0.20
0.40
0.20
0.10
0.20
0.16
0.11
0.30
0.4Q
0.50
0.30
0.40
0.20
0.30
0.10
0.40
0.30
0.30
0.10
0.40
0.50
0.30
0.30
0.40
0.32
0.13
YU
0.50
O.PO
0.60
o.sn
o.*n
0 . 3 0
O.«n
O.?0
O.fin
0.40
0.50
0,25
0.60
0.60
0,50
0.4Q
0.60
0.50
O.lfi
T
48
3.
12
5
2
24
1
1
8
' 4
6
12
4
24
5.5
3.0
12.0
11.0
13.1
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1 n
n
0
0
0
0,0
o.n
0.0
o.n
o.n
-------
11
POLLUTANT CODE «. 1
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE « 3
. I'
PER CENT OF POP AFFECTED a 50
POLLUTANT • OXIOANT
CATEGORY a OLD AGE
POUND o 2
OOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
'10
11
•12
13
14
15
16
MEOI AN
FIRST QCAR
THIPO OuiR
APITH MEAX
STANDARD DEV
INCAPACITY
YL x
O.BO
0.60
0.80
0.80
0.60
0.50
0.60
0,30
0.7o
0.60
0.65
0.60
0.60
1.40
0.60
0.60
o.eo
0.68
0.24
1.00
1,00
1.20
1.05
1.00
0.85
o .so
0.65
1.10
0.80
1.00
0.80
*
O.BO
1.70
1.00
0.80
1.05
0.98
0.25
YU
1.20
1.60
1,60
1.45
1.30
1.15
1.00
1.10
1.55
1.20
1.40
1,00
1.00
2.00
1.25
1.10
1.55
1.32
0.29
T
36
10
18
36
24
30
36
20
24
24
20
24
48
24
24.0
20.0
36.0
?6,7
9.6
R
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISABILITY
YL *
0.60
0.40
0,60
0.55
0,40
0.45
0,40
0.25
0.50
0.40
0.40
0,35
0.40
0.55
0.40
0.40
0.55
0.45
O'lO
y.eo
0.80
0,90
0,70
0.80
0.65
0.60
0.45
0.90
0.60
0.75
0.55
0.60
0.80
0.72
0.60
0.80
0.71
0,14
YU
1.00
1.20
1.20
1.00
1.10
0.90
0.30
1.05
1.25
1.00
1.05
0.75
0.80
1.05
1.02
0.90
1,10
1.01
0«15
T R
30 0 .
7 0
12 0
24 0
2* 0
30 0
24 0
16 0
12 0
24 0
18 0
24 0
24 0
48 0
24.0 0.0
16.0 0.0
24.0 0.0
22.6 0,0
10.0 0*0
DISCOMFORT
YL x
0.50
0.30
0.20
0,35
0,30
0,30
0.20
0,10
0.20
0.30
0.30
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.30
0.2B
0.10
O.TO
0.60
o.*o
0.60
0.50
0.50
0.40
0.15
0,50
0.50
0.50
0.35
0.50
0.60
0,50
0.40
0.60
0.49
0.13
YU T
0.*/> 16
1 . '- 1 3
O.i.'* 6
C.*-, 20
C. M 12
t . «.'. 9
C.lft 18
C . >:) 5
t..<3
1 .III ;.
-------
CALIF ARB
POLLUTANT CODE «.1
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE » 3
j"
PER CENT OF POP AFFECTED a 90
POLLUTANT « OXIOANT
CATEGORY » OLD AGE
ROUND • 2
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
'10
11
•12
13
1*
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST QUAR
THIRD QUAR
ARITH MEAN
STANDARD DEV
INCAPACITY
YL *
0.90
1.00
4,00
1.80
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.40
1.20
0,70
1.00
1.10
1.00
1.80
1.00
0.90
1.20
1.26
0.87
1*00
1.40
5.00
2.10
1.40
1.50
0.90
0.70
1.60
0.80
1.20
1.30
*
1.40
2.00
1.40
1.00
1.60
1.59
1.06
YU
1.20
2.00
6.00
1.50
1.80
2.20
1.00
1.40
2.00
0.90
1.40
1.50
1.80
2.20
1.65
1.40
2.00
1.92
1.24
T R
96 6
24 0
96 0
9 0
24 0
24 0
4 0
24 0
8 0
96 0
12 0
48 0
24 0
24 0
24.0 0.0
12.0 0.0
48.0 0.0
36.6 0.0
33.9 0.0
DISABILITY
YL *
0«60
0.80
2.00
1.00
0.60
0.70
0.70
0.30
0,80
0.60
0.80
0.65
• 0.60
1.50
0.70
0.60
0.80
0.83
0.43
U.7Q
1.00
2.50
1.60
1.00
1.20
0.80
0.50
1.20
0.70
1.00
0.85
1.00
1.70
1.00
0.80
1.20
1.13
0.52
YU
1.00
1.40
3.00
2.20
1.40
1.70
0.90
1.20
1.60
0.80
1.20
1.05
1.40
1.90
1.40
1.05
1.70
1.48
0.59
T R
48 0
12 0
48 0
7 0
8 0
24 0
2 0
20 0
8 0
4 0
12 0
24 0
48 0
9 0
12.0 0.0
8.0 0.0
24.0 o.o
19.6 0.0
16.8 0.0
DISCOMFORT
YL *
0.30
0.60
0.80
0.20
0.40
0.40
0.60
0.05
0.40
0.60
0.60
0.15
0.40
1.20
0.40
0.30
0.60
0.48
0.29
0.40
0.80
0.90
0.80
0.60
0.70
0.70
0.10
0.80
0,70
0.80
0.35
0,60
1.50
0.70
0,60
0.80
0.70
0,32
YU
O«TO
1.00
1.00
1.40
1.00
0.90
0,80
0.20
1.20
0.80
1.00
0.55
0.80
1.80
0.95
0.80
1.00
0.94
0.38
T
24
2
12
5
4
24
1
1
6
4
6
12
4
24
5.5
4.0
12.0
9,4
8.6
»»
n
o
n
n
0
0
n
n .
n
' 0
n
0
n
n
0.0
OtO
0.0
0,0
O.n
-------
CALIF ARA
POLLUTANT CODE • i
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE = *
!"
PER CENT OF POP AFFECTED • 0
POLLUTANT • OXIOANT
CATEGORY a HEART CONOf MILD
ROUND • 2
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
:12
13
1*
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST QUAR
THIRD OUAR
iRiiH MEAN
STANDARD OEV
INCAPACITY
YL x
0.30
Ot3Q
0,20
0.30
0.05
0.30
0.40
0.10
0.00
0.20
0.20
0,00
0.10
0.10
0.20
0,10
0.30
0.18
0.13
0.40
0«*0
0.40
0.40
0.20
0.40
0,50
0.15
0,20
0,30
0.30
0,10
0.40
0.25
0.35
0.20
0,40
0.31
0.12
YU
0.60
0.50
0.60
0.50
0.30
0.50
0.60
0.20
0.40
0.40
0.50
0.20
0.80
0.30
0.50
0.30
0,60
0.46
0.17
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0>0
0.0
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISABILITY
YL *
0.20
0.20
0.10
0.20
0.05 .
0.10
0.30
0.05
O.CO
0.20
O.lO
0.00
0.10
0.05
0.10
0.05
0.20
0.12
0.09
0.30
0.30
0.20
0.30
0,20
0.20
0.40
0.10
0.20
0.25
0.20
9.05
9.30
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.30
U.23
0.09
YU
0.50
O.*0
0.40
0.40
0.30
0.30
0.50
0.15
0.40
0.30
0.30
0.10
0.60
0.30
0.35
0.30
0.40
0.35
0.13
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
o.o
0.0
DISCOMFORT
YL x
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.20
0.00
0,00
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.03
0.00
0.10
0.06
0.07
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.30
0.10
0.20
0.25
0.10
0.05
0.20
0.10
0.15
0.10
0.20
0.16
0.07
YU
0.30
0.30
0.30
0.20
O.?0
0.20
0.40
0.15
O.*0
0.30
O.?0
0.10
o.*o
o.?o
0.?=,
"•?•-
f- 1 «
*•"•-•
?.?'.
:.: 1
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 .
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
^ .'•
0.0
8'
0
n
0
0
0
0
n
0
n
' n
n
n
n
n
0*0
0.0
o.n
0.0
0.0
-------
POLLUTANT COOF
POLLUTANT o OXIOANT
PAOP
14
r VTWUB I lull V.«ltUUXT LODt
!'
' PER CENT OF POP AFFECTED
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
-12
13
14
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST OUAP
THIPO QUAP
ARITM MEAN-
STANDARD DEV
INCAPACITY
YL X
0.6o
0.40
0.40
0.50
0.50
0.30
0.6Q
0.45
0.6o
0.40
0.60
0,40
0.4Q
UOO
0.47
o.*o
0.60
0.51
0.17
0.8o
0.60
0.80
0.80
0.80
0.50
0.80
0,65
0.90
0.60
0.80
0.60
,0.60
1.20
0.80
0.60
0.80
0.76
0.18
« 4
a 10
YU
1.00
1.20
1.20
1.00
1.10
0.70
1.00
1.50
1.40
0.80
1.10
0,80
0.80
1.80
1.05
0.80
1.20
1.10
0.31
CATEGORY • HEART CONDi
T
24
20
18
28
48
30
30
20
48
24
24
24
24
24
24.0
24.0
30.0
27,6
9.3
R
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0,0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISABILITY
YL A
0.50
0.30
0.30
0.35
0.40
0.30
O.*0
0.40
0.30
0.30
0.30
0.25
0.30
0.30
0.30
0.3o
0.40
0.34
0.07
0.70
0.50
0.60
0.60
0.70
0.45
0.60
0.70
9.60
0.40
0.55
0,45
0,50
0.80
0.60
0.50
0.70
0.58
«,
0.12
MILD
ROUND
YU
0.90
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.90
0.55
0.80
1.40
1.00
0.60
0.85
0.65
0.70
1.10
0.88
0.80
1.00
0.88
0.21
• 2
T
20
10
12
18
2*
2*
20
12
48
18
20
12
2<>
36
20.0
12,0
24,0
21.3
10.2
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISCOMFORT
YL ' x
0.40
0.20
0.30
0.10
0.30
0.10
0.30
0.05
0.10
0.30
0.10
1
0,05
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.10
0,30
0,19
0.11
0.50
0.40
0.40
0.30
0.40
0.20
0.4Q
0.10
0.40
0.4Q
0.20
0.10
O.*0
0.50
0.4Q
0.20
0.40
0.34
0.13
YU
0.8Q
0.60
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.30
0.50
0.20
0.70
0.50
0.30
0.20
0.6Q
1.00
0.50
0.30
0.60
0.51
0.22
T %
4d n
2 n
t n
ft n
« n
?'« n
I n
1 n
1? n
4 n
6 n
2* 0
« n
24 n
* . 'i o . n
* . o o.o
? 4 . 3 0 . n
1 1 ,9 n.n
! j . ~ O.n
-------
POLLUTANT CODE •.1
POLLUTANT • OXIOANT
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE
!'
PER CENT OF POP AFFECTED
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
••12
13
14
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST OUAP
THIRD GUAS
ARITh *EAN
STANDARD CEV
INCAPACITY
YL x
0.80
0.60
o.eo
0,70
0.60
0.50
1.00
0.45
0.80
0.60
0.8o
0.60
0.60
1.40
0.65
0,60
0.90
0.73
0.24
1.00
1.00
1.20
1.00
1.00
0.85
1.20
o.eo
1.20
1.00
1.00
o.eo
*
0.80
1.60
1.00
0.85
1,20
1.03
0,22
« 4
" 50
YU
1,30
1.60
1.60
1.40
1.40
1.15
1.40
1.45
1,60
1.40
1.20'
1.00
1.00
2.00
1.40
1.20
1.60
1.39
0.27
CATEGORY « HEART COND» MILD
ROUND '
T
24
20
18
32
48
30
30
24
48
24
24
24
24
0
24.0
24.0
30.0
26.4
11.9
R
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISABILITY
YL *
0.60
0.40
0.60
0.40
0.50
0,45
0.80
0.4Q
0.40
0,60
0.40
0.40
•0.40
1.00
0.42
O.*0
0.60
0.52
0.18
a. 80
o.eo
U.90
0.70
0.90
0,65
1.00
0.65
0,80
9.80
9.70
0,60
0.60
1.20
0.80
0.65
0.90
0.79
0.17
YU
1.00
1.40
1.20
1.10
1.20
0.95
1.20
1.35
1.20
1.40
1 ,00
0.80
0,80
1 .60
1 .CO
1,00
1,35
1.16
0.23
• 2
T
20
10
12
20
24
30
20
16
48
• 24
20
12
2*
36
20.0
16.0
24,0
22.6
10.2
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
o.o
DISCOMFORT
YL ' x
O.feO
0.30
0,40
0.30
0.30
0.30
0,50
0.05
0,40
0.40
0.20
0.10
0.40
0.90
0.35
0,30
0.40
0.37
0.21
0.70
0.50
0.50
0.40
0.40
0.40
0,60
0.10
0.80
0.50
0.40
0.20
0.60
1.00
0.50
0,40
0.6Q
0.51
0.23
YU
0.9Q
0.70
0.60
0.70
6.60
0.60
0,70
0.20
l.?0
0.60
0.60
0.30
0.80
1.20
0.65
0.60
o.eo
0.69
0.28
T 0*
48 n
2 n
6 ft
fe ft
4 ft
= 4 ft
n
1 ft
12 • n
H ' ft
f-. ft
2~ 0
A n
24 n
6,0 O.n
4.0 0,"
? » . 0 0.0
12.1 -i . .1
13.- ".1
-------
CALIF ARH
16
POLLUTANT CODE
POLLUTANT o OXIDANT
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE '
i
PER CENT OF POP' AFFECTED ;
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
;12
13
14
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST QUAR
THIRD QUAR
APITH MEAN
STANDARD CEV
INCAPACITY
YL X
1.10
1.00
2.00
1.60
0.30
0.90
0.80
0,50
1.20
0.7o
O.^O
1.00
1.00
1.30
1.00
0,30
1.20
i ,09
0.*3
1.20
1.40
4.00
2.10
1,60
1.50
0.90
0.50
1.60
0,80
1.20
1.20
1.80
2.00
1.45
1.20
1.80
1.59
0.80
B 4
B 90
YU
1.40
2.00
6.00
7,50
2.00
2.10
1.00
1.70
2.00
0.90
1.50
1.40
2,60
2.20
2.00
1,40
2.20
2.45
1.90
CATE30I
T R
96 0
24 0
96 0
10 0
74 0
24 0
8 0
24 0
24 0
4 0
12 0
48 0
12 0
24 0
24,0 0.0
12.0 0,0
48.0 0.0
34.3 0.0
31.7 0.0
*Y B HEAR
r CONDI M;
DISABILITY
YL *
1.00
0.80
1.40
0.90
0.60
0.70
0.70
0.40
1.00
0.60
0.70
0.60
0.80
1 .50
0.75
0.60
1.00
0.64
0.31
1.10
1.00
1.60
1.50
1.40
1.20
0.80
u.so
1 .40
0.70
0.90
0.80
1.20
1.70
1,15
o.eo
1.40
1.15
0.33
iLn
ROUND »
YU
1.30
1,40
1.80
2.00
1.80
1,70
n.90
1.70
1.80
0.80
1.10
1.00
1.60
1.90
1.65
1.10
1.80
1.49
0.40
z
T R
48 0
2 0
46 0
8 0
24 0
24 0
2 0
24 0
12 0
. 24 0
12 0
24 0
24 0
14 0
24,0 0,0
12.0 0.0
24,0 0.0
20.7 0.0 .
14.2 0.0
DISCOMFORT
YL *
0.90
0,60
0,40
0.20
0.40
0.40
0.60
0.05
0.60
0.60
0.50
0.20
0.40
1.20
0.45
0,40
0.60
0.50
0.29
1.00
0,80
0.60
0.70
0.50
0.70
0.70
0.10
1.00
0.70
0.70
0.40
0.80
1.50
0.70
0.60
0.80
0.73
0.32
TO T « •
l.?0 4a 0
1.00 2 0
0.4o 12 0
1 . ?o 6 n
0 , T •/ 4 0
O.V, 24 0
O.O 1 0
0,>1 1 0
l.*i 12 o
O.M 4 '0
O.V1 6 0
c.*-i 24 n
1 . > '. 4 0
^.^1 24 n
v .'•> i is.o O.n
C t \ » , 0 0 I fl
< ' i ?* ,o O.n
f *O 1 ?« 3 0.0
( •• ; j3.4 o.n
-------
AflR
fir
POLLUTANT CODE « i
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE » 5
«
PER CENT Of POP AFFECTED s 0
POLLUTANT «-OXIOANT
CATEGORY o HEART CONDi SEV
ROUND a 2
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
9
9
io
.11
-12
13
14
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST GUAP
THIRD QuAR
ARITH MEAN;
STANDARD DEv
INCAPACITY
YL x
0.30
0,20
0,20
0.30
0.05
0.20
0,00
0,10
0.00
0.25
0.30
0,00
0.10
0.30
0.20
0.05
0.30
0.16
0.12
0.40
0.30
0,30
0.50
0.10
0,30
0,00
0.15
0,20
0,30
0.45
0.05
0.40
0,50
0.30
0.15
0.40
0.29
0.16
YU
0.50
0.40
0,40
0.70
0.20
0,40
0.10
0.20
0,40
0.35
0.60
0.15
0.90
0,40
0.40
0.20
0.60
O.U
0.21
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
o.o
0.0
0,0
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISABILITY
YL *
0.20
0.20
0,10
0.10 .
0.05
• o.io
0,00
0.05
0.00
0.20
0,20
0,00
0,10
0.20
0.10
0.05
0.20
0.11
0.08
0.30
0.30
0.20
0.30
0.10
0.15
0.00
0,10
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.05
0.40
0.30
0.23
0.10
0.30
0.21
0.12
YU
0.40
0.40
0.30
0.60
0.20
0.20
0.10
0,15 .
0,40
0.30
0.40
0.15
0.60
0.50
0.3S
0.20
0.40
0.34
0.16
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
• 0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0,0
0.0
o.o
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0,0
0.0
0.0
DISCOMFO*. •
YL
0,10
0.10
0.10
0.00
0.05
0.05
0.00
0.00
0,00
0,20
0.00
0,00
0.10
0.10
0.05
0.00
0.10
0.06
0,06
C 20
:.10
o."-o
0<10
0.10
0.10
0.00
0,10
0,20
0.25
0,10
0.05
0.40
0.20
0.15
0.10
0,20
0,16
0.10
YU ,
0.30
0.30
0.30
0.20
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.15
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.15
0.60
0.30
0.25
0.15
0.30
0.26
0.13
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
R
n
n
0
n
0
n
0
0
n
' 0
0
n
n
0
O.o
0,0
O.o
0,0
0,0
-------
CALIF
POLLUTANT CODE a 1
POLLUTANT • OXIDANT
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE n 5
»
PER CENT Or POP i'FECTED a 10
INCAPACITY
DOCTOR YL x
2 0.50
3 0.30
4 0.60
5 0.40
7 0.4Q
8 0.30
9 0,30
10 0.20
11 0.60
;12 .0.60
13 0.4Q
14 0.35
15 0-.*0
16" 0.70
MEDIAN 0.4Q
FIRST GUAR 0,30
THIPO OUA9 0.60
ARITH VEAS 0.43
5TA.'JOA»0 OEv 0,15
0.60
0.60
0.70
0.60
0,50
0.40
0.40
. 0.80
1.00
0.70
0.60
0.60
*
o.eo
1.20
0.60
0.60
o.eo
0.69
0.22
YU
0.80
1.00
0,80
0.80
0.60
0.50
0.50
1.20
1.40
o.eo
0.80
0.75
1.00
1.50
0.80
0.75
1.00.
0.89
0.30
CATEGORY » HEART COND, SEV
ROUND <*
T R
144 0
24 0
96 0
11 0
24 0
24 0
24 0
6 0
12 0
24 0
12 0
24 0
48 0
2 0
24.0 0,0
12.0 0.0
24.0 0.0
33."? 0.0
39.3 0.0
DISABILITY
YL *
0.40
0.20
0.30
0.30
0.30
0.20
0.40
0.25
0.25
0.30
0.25
0.25
'0.30
0.50
0.30
0.25
ti.30
0.30
0.08
0,60
0.40
0.50
0.55
O.ftO
0.30
0.60
0.55
0.60
0,50
9.50
0.45
0.50
0.7.0
0.52
0.50
0.60
0.52
0.10
YU
0.80
0.80
0.70
0.75
0.90
0.40
0.80
1.15
1.00
0.90
0.80
0,60
0.70
1.00
0.60
0.70
0.90
0.81
0.18
2
T R
36 0
10 0
12 o";
48 0
24 0
24 0
72 0
10 0
24 0
18 0
18 0
36 0
24 0
0 0
24.0 0.0
12,0 0.0
36.0 0.0
25.4 0.0
18.2 0.0
DISCOMFORT
YL *
0.20
0.20
0.10
0.10
0,30
0.10
0.20
0.05
0.20
0.25
0.05
0,15
0,30
0.40
0.20
0.10
0.25
0.19
0.10
0*40
0.30
0.20
0.40
0.50
6.15
0.40
0.10
0.40
0.40
0.20
0.35
0.40
0.60
0.40
0.20
0.40
0.34
0.14
YU
0.60
0,80
0.30
0,55
0.70
0.20
0.60
0.20
0.60
0.70
0.40
0.55
- 0.60
0.8Q
0.60
0.40
0.70
0,54
O.?0
T »
24 °
5 n
4 n
4-. n
1- i
?•- o
'H 0
5 0
?<, 0
IH n
1* n
"
n
40 n
?* . ^ o . i
15.0 0.0
? » . .*> o.i
? 1 . * 0 . n
1 ? . 1 '» . o
-------
POLLUTANT CODE • i
POLLUTANT » OXIOANT
POPULAT
ION CATEGORY COC-E «
1 "
PEP. CENT OF POP AFFECTED '
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
'12
13
14
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST QUAS
THIPD QUAR
ARITH ^EAN
STifvOARO OEV
INCAPACI
YL
0,70
0.40
0.80
0.70
0.50
0.35
0,80
0.30
0,60
0.6Q
0.50
0,40
0.70
0.85
0.60
0.40
0.70
0.59
0.18
TY
X
0.90
0.80
1.10
1,00
0.90
0.65
1.00
0.80
1,20
1.00
0,80
»0,70
1.00
1.30
0.95
0.60
1.00
0.94
0.18
' 5
" 50
YU
1.10
1,40
1.40
1.40
1.20
0.95
1.20
1.35
1,60
1.40
1.20
1.00
1.10
1.70
1.27
1.10
1.40
1.29
0,22
CATEGO^
T R
46 0
20 0
24 0
48 0
43 0
48 0
120 0
16 0 -
24 0
24 0
26 0
48 0
48 0
96 0
48.0 0.0
24.0 0.0
48.0 0.0
45.6 0.0
29.6 0.0
(T 3 1-IC.A*!
\,umu« -"t
DISABILITY
YL *
0.60 0.80
0.40
0.50
0.55
0.40
0.30
0.60
0.25
0.60
0.50
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.70
0.50
0.40
0.60
0.47
0.13
0,60
0.80
0.75
0.80
0.50
0.80
0.65
1.00
0.80
0.60
0.60
0.70
l.CO
0.77
0.60
0.80
0.74
0.15
V
ROUND «
YU
1.00
1.20
1.10
1.00
1.10
0.70
1.00
1.25
1.40
1.30
0.95
0,80
0.90
1.40
1.C5
0.95
1.25
1.08
0_ *
• 2 *
2
T R
36 0
10 0
18 0
48 0
24 0
24 0
72 0
10 0
24 0
24 0
24 0
36 0
2* 0
36 0
24.0 0.0
24.0 0.0
36.0 0.0
29e3 0.0
U1 t\ 0
* 1 U t v
DISCOMFORT
YL *
0.50 0.60
0.20
0.10
0.25
0.30
0.20
0.40
0.10
0.25
0,30
0.15
0.30
0.40
0.60
0.27
0.20
0.40
0.29
0.15
0.40
0.30
0.45
0.60
0,30
0.60
0.15
0.60
0,50
0,40
0,50
0.60
0.80
0,50
0.40
0.60
0,49
0.17
YU T °
0,80 ?^ "
1.00 u ft
O.SO '. n
0,*5 - :1
0.<»o
0,*0
0.90 "
0.25 "
1 . •; 9 "
0.<»<5 n
o . •» o i n
O.?l -- 1
' C . » 1 • < °
! . n • • p
t.*i ?*.• ''.°
r' i ^ ' * ? • * '• • ^
t . * .1 ? 4 . ' •- • °
'. . ~*i ?\ . '• '• . ">
i . ?2 : ?'•*> -'n
-------
Cat If
POLLUTANT CODE a 1
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE a 5
»'
PER CENT OF POP'AFFECTED ° 90
20
POLLUTANT • OXIOANT
CATEGORY = HEART COND* SEV
ROUND • 2
INCAPACITY
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
-;12
13
14
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST QUAS
THIRD QUIP
ARITH WEAN
STANDARD CEV
YL
1.10
1.00
2.00
1.50
0.80
0.7o
0.7o
0.50
1.60
. 0.9Q
1.00
1.00
1.20
1.80
1.00
0.80
1.50
1.13
0.*4
X
1.10
1.40
3.00
2.00
1.20
1.10
0.80
1.10
1.80
1.00
1.20
1.20
>
1..60
2,10
1,20
1,10
1.80
1.47
0.58
YU
1.40
2.00
4.00
2.50
1.80
1.60
0.90
1,90
2.00
1.10
1.60
1.40
2.00
2.30
1.85
1.40
2.00
1,89
0.75
T
144
24
96
11
24
24
24
10
12
24
12
48
48
24
1
24.0
12.0
48.0
37.5
38.1
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISABILITY
YL
0.70
0.80
1.40
0.80
0.80
0.60
0.60
0.40
1.40
0.80
0.60
0.60
0.60
1.50
0.80
0.60
0,80
0.84
0.34
A
0.80 "
1.00
1.50
1.30
1.20
0.90
0.70
1.00
1.60
0.90
1.00
0.80
1.00
1.80
1.00
0,90
1.30
1.11
0,33
YU
1.10
1.40
1.60
2.00
1.60
1.20
0.80
1.80
l.BO
1,00
1,20
1.00
1.40
2.10
1,40
1.10
1.80
1.43
0,40
T
96
24
48
9
24
24
8
1
12
. 4
12
24
24
12
18.0
9.0
24,0
23.0
24.2
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
b
0
0.0
0.0
0,0
0.0
o.o
DISCOMFORT
YL
0.50
0.60
1.20
0.10
0,50
0.10
0.30
0.10
1.20
0,60
0.60
0.20
0,40
1.30
0.50
0.20
0.60
0.55
0,41
X
0.60
0,80
1.30
0.60
0.80
0.50
0.40
0.15
1.40
0.70
0.80
0.40
0.80
1.50
0.75
0.50
0,80
0.77
0.39
YU
o.ao
1.00
1.40
1.10
1.20
0.9fl
0.50
0.20
1.60
O.«0
1.00
0.60
' 1.20
l.BO
1.00
o.«o
1.20
1,01
0«43
T
96
24
12
7
24
24
6
1
24
24
6
24
24
12
24.0
7.0
?*.o
22.0
?3.0
8
0
0
n
0
0
n
0
0
0
' 0
0
0
n
0
O.n
0,0
O.n
0.*
0.0
-------
CALIF
POLLUTANT CODE * 1
POPULATION CATEGORY coo£ e 6
t"
PER CENT OF POP'AFFECTED a o
POLLUTANT • OXIDANT
CATEGORY = HAY FEVER* SINUS
ROUND * z
INCAPACITY
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10 .
11
12
13
1*
^
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST QUA.R
TnIRO Qt'AP
6RIT* MEAN
STANDARD OEV
YL
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.30
0,20
0.10
0.00
0.10
0.00
0.10
0.10
0,00
0.20
0.15
0.13
0.10
0.20
0.13
0.09
X
0.40
0.30
0,40
0.^5
0,30
0.30
0.20
0.15
0,20
0.20
0.25
0.10
0,40
0.25
0.27
0.20
O.*0
0,28
0,11
YU
0.60
0.40
0.60
0.60
0.40
0,50
0.40
0.20
0.40
0,30
0,40
0.20
0,60
0.30
0.40
0,30
0,60
O.aS
0.14
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
R
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o-
0.0
0.0
0.0
0,0
0.0
DISABILITY
YL
0.10
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.10
o.oo
0.05
0.00
0.15
0.05
0.00
"0.10
0.05
0.10
0.05
0.20
o.lo
0.08
A
V«20
0.30
0.30
0.50
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.10
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.10
0.30
0.10
0.20
0,10
0.30
0.22
0.11
YU
. 0.40
0,40
0.40
0.80
0 . 4 0
0.30
0.30
0.15
0.40
0,25
0,30
0.20
0.50
0.15
0.35
. 0.25
0.40
0,35
0.17
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
• 0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0,0
0.0
0,0
0.0
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
o.o
DISCOMFORT
YL
0.00
0.10
0.06
0.00
0,05
0,05
0.00
0.05
0,00
0.15
0.00
0.00
b.oo
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.03
0.05
X
0.10
0.20
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
o.oo
0.10
0.20
0.20
0.10
0.10
0.20
C.10
0.10
0,10
0.20
0.12
C.06
-------
CALIF ARtt
POLLUTANT CODE = 1
POLLUTANT » OXIDANT
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE
4
PER CENT OF POP AFFECTED
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
e
9
10
11
:i2
13
14
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRS7 QUAR
TMIPD QL'AR
' ARITH MEAN
STANDARD OEV
INCAP4C
YL
0.40
0.20
0.4Q
0.40
0.50
0.30
0.40
0.10
0.20
0-.35
0.60
0.40
o.4o.
0.50
0.^0
0.30
O.*0
0.37
0,13
!TY
X
0.60
0.60
0.80
0.65
0,80
0*40
0.60
0.45
0.60
0.50
0.90
0.60
*
0,&0-
o.7o
0,60
0.60
0.70
0.63
0.1*
• 6
o 10
YU
o.ao
1.20
1.20
1.05
1.10
0.50
0.80
0.85
1. 00
0.70
1,20
0.80
0,80
1.00
0.93
0.80
1,10
0.93
0,21
CATEGORY o HAY
T
30
7
18
46
24
48
36
12
24
18
20
48
18
16
22.0
18,0
36.0
?6.2
13.8
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0,0
FEVER* SINUS
ROUND •
DISABILITY
YL *
0.30
0.20
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.10
0.20
0.10
0.20
0.20
0.40
0.30
0.30
0.30
0.25
0.20
0.30
0.25
0.09
0.50
0.50
0,60
0.55
0.70
0.25
0.40
0.30
U.40
0.40
y.6o
0.45
0,50
0.50 •
0.50
0,«0
V.55
0.47
0.12
YU
0.70
1,20
0.90
0.80
1,00
0.35
0.60
0.45
0.80
0.70
0.90
0.65
0.70
0.80
0.75
0.65
0.90
0.75
0.22
i 2
T
2*
7
12
24
24
24
2*
9
2*
18
18
2*
12
16
21.0
12.0
24.0
18.6
6.4
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0,0
0.0
0.0 .
0.0
DISCOMFORT
YL x
0.20
0.20
0.05
0.10
0.30
0.10
0.00
0,05
0.10
0.20
0,05
0,10
0,30
0.25
0.10
0.05
0.20
0.14
0.10
0.30
0.30
0.10
0.30
0.50
0.20
0.20
0.15
0.35
0.30
0.15
0.30
O.*0
0.40
0,30
0.20
0,35
0,28
0.11
YU
0,40
0.60
0.20
0.40
0,60
0.30
0.40
0.30
0.60
0,40
0.35
0.50
6.60
0.65
0.4Q
0.35
0.60
0.46
0.17
T
12
3
8
16
12
46
10
7
24
18
8
1?
A
12
12.0
e.c
16.0
14,0
11.1
4
0
0
0
n
n
n
n
0
n
n
n
0
0
0
•:„• . o
o.n
o , n
t>. n
•!. 1
-------
CALIF AH*
POLLUTANT CODE » i
PAGE
POLLUTANT • OXIOANT
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE
PER CENT OF POP AFFECTED
• 6
a SO
CATEGORY a HAY
INCAPACITY
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
n
12
13
1*
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST QUAR
THIPO QUA;?
ARIT- MEAN
STANDARD DEV
YL
O.?0
0.40
o.eo
o.eo
0,60
0.30
0.60
0.25
0.60
0.60
0.60
0.55
0.60
1.00
0.60
0.55
0.70
0,60
0.20
X
0.9Q
0,80
1.20
1.00
0.90
0,50
0.80
0.60
1,00
0.80
1.00
0.75
o.eo
1.20
0.85
0.80
1.00
0.87
0«20
YU
1.10
1.40
1.60
1.40
1.30
0.70
1.00
1.00
1.40
1.20
1.40
0.95
1.00
1.60
1.25
1.00
1.40
1.22
0.2^
T
30
10
18
48
24
48
36
10
24
18
20
48
18
16
22.0
18,0
36.0
26,3
13.6
P
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0,0
0.0
FtVERi SINUS
ROUND '
> 2
DISABILITY
YL
0.60
0.40
0.60
0.55
0.50
0.25
0.40
0.20
0.40
O.«0
0.40
0.40
0.50
0.60
0,40
O.*0
0.55
0.44
0.12
X
0.70
0.60
0.90
0.80
0.80
0.35
0,60
0.35
•0,30
0.60
0.60
0.60
9.70
0.80
0.65
0.60
0.30
0.66
0,16
YU
' 0.90
1.20
1.20
1.00
1.10
0,50
0.80
0.80
1.20
1.00
0,90
0.80
0.90
1.00
0.95
0.80
1.10
0.95
0*20
T
2*
" 7
12
2*
24
2*
2*
9
24
18
18
2*
12
16
21.0
12.0
24.0
18.6
6.4
R
0
0
0 "
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0»0
DISCOMFORT
YL
0.40"
0.20
0.10
0,20
0.30
0.20
0.20
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.05
0.15
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.15
0.30
0.22
0.11
X
o.so
0.40
0.20
0.40
0.60
0,30
0.40
0.25
0.50
0.40
0.25
0,35
0.60
0.50
0.4Q
0.30
0.50
0.40
0.13
YU
0«60
1.00
0.40
0,60
0.80
0.40
0.60
0.35
O.flO
0.60
O.f.O
0.55
0.80
0.80
0.60
0.55
0.80
0.64
0«19
T
12
3
8
16
12
24
10
7
24
13
8
12
6
12
12.0
8,0
lc.0
l?.l
k,'i
*
n
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
• n
0
0
n
0
0.0
0.0
o.n
O.n
0 < n
-------
CALIF
POLLUTANT CODE • 1
POPULATION CATEGORY COOE = 6
«'
PEP CE.NT OF P0° AFFECTED a 90
POLLUTANT * OXIDANT
CATEGORY * HAY FEVL&» SINUS
ROUND • 2
DOCTOR
2
'. . 3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
;12
13
U
15
16
MEDIAN
F1SST QUAP
THIRD GijAR
ARITi H.FAN
STANDARD CEv
INCAPAC
YL
0.30
0,60
1.00
0.80
0.80
O.So
0.80
0.25
0.30
.0,80
0.6Q
0.80
O.TO
1.20
0.30
0.60
O.Sfl
0.75
0.22
ITY
X
1.00
1.00
1,40
1.00
1,10
0.80
1.00
.0.75
1.20
1,00
1.00
1.00
*
1,0.0
1.50
1.00
1.00
1.10
1.05
0.20
DISABILITY
YU
1,20
1,60
1,80
1.40
1.50
1.10
1.20
1.20
1.60
1,60
1.25
1.20
1.30
l.SO
1.38
1.20
1.60
1.42
0.23
T
30
10
24
48
24
48
36
10
24
24
20
48
18
16
24.0
18,0
36.0
27.1
13.2
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0,0
0.0
0.0
YL
0.60
O.*0
0.60
0.55
0,60
0.30
O.fcO
0.20
0.60
o.fco
0.4Q
0.60
' 0.70
O.BO
0.60
0.40
0.60
0.54
0.16
X
0.80
0.80
1.00
0.80
0.90
0.50
0.80
0.55
1.00
0.80
0.70
0.80
0,90
1.00
0.80
0.80
9.90
0.61
0.15
YU
loOO
1,20
1.40
1.00
1.30
0.70
1.00
0.95
1.40
1.20
l.CO
1.00
1.10
1.25
1.05
1.00
1.25
1.11
0.19
T
?4
7
16
24
24
24
24
9
24
18
18
24
12
16
21.0
16.0
24.0
18.9
6.1
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0,0
0.0
0,0
0.6
DISCOMFORT
YL
0.40
0.30
0,20
0,25
0.40
0,30
0,40
0,10
0.20
0,30
0.10
0.25
0,60
0.40
0,30
0,20
0,40
0.30
0.13
X
0.50
0.60
0.30
0.45
0.70
0.40
0.60
0.30
0.60
0.50
0.30
0.45
0,80
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.60
0.51
0.15
YU
0.70
1.00
0,40
0.60
0.90
0.50
O.SO
0.55
1.00
0.90
O.feO
0,65
'1.00
0.90
0.75
0 . fc 0
0.50
0.7 =
0.25
T «
\2 «
3 n
12 o
16 n
12 o
?* n
i 0 1
•• 0
P» 0
1- n
•i 0
'• • n
~ ^
\t n
', ? . : 0 , n
-- . ' 0,0
•••..: c . o
e . * 0 , ft
-. . i 0 . n
-------
15
POLLUTANT CODE « 1
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE a 7
*'
PE» CENT OF POP AFFECTED » 0
POLLUTANT » OXIOANT
CATEGORY • INFLUENZA
ROUND
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
.1°
11
12
13
14
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST QUAR
THIRD CUAR
ARITH MEAN
STANDARD DEV
INCAPACITY
YL x
0.20
0.00
0.30
0.30
0.05
0.15
0.20
0.05
0.20
Q.10
0,10
0.00
0.20
0.15
0.15
0.05
0.20
0.14
0.10
0,40
0.10
0.50
0.50
0.10
0.30
0.30
0.10
0.40
0.20
0,30
0.10
0.40.
0.25
0.30
0.10
0,40
0,23
0.15
YU
0.60
0,40
0.70
0.70
0.20
0.45
0.40
0.20
0.60
0.30
0.50
0.15
0,60
0.40
0,42
0.30
0.60 .
0.44
0.18
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
. 0,0
0.0
0.0
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
o.o
DISABILITY
YL X
0.20
o.io
0.20
0,10
0.05
0,10
0.10
O.C5
0.05
0.05
0.10
o.oo
0.10
0,10
0.10
0.05
0.10
0.09
0.05
0.30
0.30
0.40
0.25
0.10
0.20
0.20
0.10
0.20
0.10
0,20
0.10
0.30
0.20.
0,20
0.10
0.30
0.21
0.09
YU
0.40
0.40
0.60
0.40
0.20
0.30
0,30
0.20
0.40
0.20
0.30
0,15
0.50
0.40
0.35
0.20
0.40
0.34
0,13
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0,0
0,0
0,0
o.o
0.0
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o.o
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISCOMFORT
YL ' *
0,00
0,10
0.10
0.00
0.05
0.05
0.10
0.05
0.05
0.05
0,00
0.00
0,00
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.05
0.04
0.04
0,10
0.20
0.20
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.20
0.10
0.20
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0,10
0.10
0.10
0.20
0,13
0.05
YU
0.20
0.3(1
0.30
0.20
0.20
0.15
0.30
0.15
0.40
0.20
O.?0
0.15
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.30
0.23
0.07
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
a
n
n
n
n
n
0
n
n
n
n
n
n
o
0
O.n
o.n
0,0
o.n
o.n
-------
CALIF
POLLUT4NJ CODE • 1
POLLUTANT » OXIDANT
POPULATION CATEGORY C00£
I '
PER CENT OF POP AFFECTED
a 7
= 10
CATEGORY * INFLUENZA
INCAPACITY
DOCTOR
2
'. . 3 .
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
:i2
13
14
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST GUAP
THIBD G'jA =
4RITH MEAN
STANDARD CEV
YL
0 • 5 0 -
0.40
0.4Q
0.45
0.50
0,30
0.4Q
0.20
0.40
.0.4Q
0.40
0.40
0.30
0.60
0.4Q
0.40
0,45
0,*0
0.10
X
0-70
0.60
0.70
0.70
0.80
0.40
0.60
.0.60
0.80
0.60
0.70
0.60
*
0.50
0.8o
0.65
0.60
0,70
0.65
0,12
YU
0«90
1.20
1.00
1.10
1.20
0.55
0.80
1.10
1.20
1.00
0.90
o.eo
0.70
1.20
1.00
0.80
1,20
0.97
0,21
T
36
10
18
60
24
24
48
15
48
18
24
24
36
72
24.0
18.0
48.0
32.6
18.3
R
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0,0
0.0
0.0
ROUND « 2
DISABILITY
YL
0«40
0.40
0.30
0.30
0.30
0.15
0.30
0.10
0.10
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.30
0.5o
0.30
0.15
0.30
0.27
0.12
X
o«50
0.60
0.60
0.50
0.40
0.25
0.40
0.40
0.40
0.40
0.40
0.30
0.50
0.70.
0.40
0.40
0.50
U.45
0.12
YU
O.TO
0.80
0.90
0.70
0.60
0.35
0.50
0.80
OoBO
0.50
0.60
0.50
0.70
1.10
0.70
0.50
0.80
0.'^
0,19
T
2*
2
12
40
20
24
12
10
24
18
12
2*
12
10
15.0
12.0
24.0
17.4
9.4
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
c.o
0.0
0.0
0.0
o.b
DISCOMFORT
YU
0.20
0.20
0,10
0.10
0,30
0,10
0,20
0.10
0.20
0.20
0.05
0.10
0.20
0.40
0.20
0.10
0,20
0.17
0.09
X
0«30
0.30
0.20
0.30
0.55
0.20
0.30
0.15
0,40
0.30
0.20
0.20
0.30
0.60
0.30
0.20
0,30
0.30
0.12
YU T
C«*9 12
O.fto 5
0.*1 6
C.M 20
0.*-> 16
C.M 2»
C.M 12
C.4.1 10
t.«..1 24
C . M IB
0...1 12
0 . M 12
'C.M 8
C-».1 12
t-*-\ ;2.n
C...? !0.0
t .01 1 H , 0
i .--.n i ; . *>
i .1 -i.l
q
0
n
n
n
n
0
n
n
n
n
n
0
ft
0
O.fl
o.n
O.fl
0,0
0.0
-------
PAGE
POLLUTANT CODE • 1
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE a 7
PER CENT 0^ POP'AFFECTED a 50
POLLUTANT o OXIDANT
CATEGORY » INFLUENZA
ROUND
INCAPACITY
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
•12
13
14
15
16
MEDIAN
FiasT CUAR
THJPD 3'jAP
AS ITU *EAN
STANDARD OEV
YL
0.60
0.60
0.80
0.60
0.60
0.30
0.60
0.15
0,60
.0.60
0.65
0.60
0.50
1.00
0.60
0,60
0,60
0.59
0.20
X
O.BO
1.00
1.10
0 .85
0.90
0.50
0.60
. 0.65
1.00
0.80 .
0.90
0.80
0.80
1,20
0,82
0.80
1.00
0.86
0.18
YU
1.00
1.60
1.40
1.20
•1.30
0,70
1.00
1.10
1.40
1.00
1.20
1.00
1.10
1,40
1,15
1.00
! . ft 0 .
1.17
0.23
T
36
20
24
72
24
48
48
15
48
18
24
24
36
72
30.0
24.0
48,0
36,4
18.9
R
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0,0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISABILITY
YL
0.40
0.40
0.50
0.50
0.40
0.25
0.50
0.10
0.40
0.20
0.30
0.20
'0.40
0.70
0.40
0.25
0,50
0.37
0.16
A
U .60
0.80
9.80
0.70
0.70
0.30
0.60
0.30
0.80
0,40
0.50
0.30
0.60
0.90
0.60
0,40
o.eo
U.55
U.21
YU
0.80
1,40
1.10
0.90
1,00
0.50
0.70
0,50
1,20
o.so
0.70
0.40
0.80
1.10
0 . 0 0
C-60
1.10
0.84
0.30
T
2*
10
8
8
4
48
12
10
8
. 4
12
24
4
10
10.0
8.0
12.0
13.3
11.8
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0,0
0.0
0.0 '
0.0
o.o
DISCOMFORT
YL ' '
0.30
0.40
0.10
0,20
0.30
0.10
0.20
0.10
0.20
0.30
0,15
0.20
0.30
0.60
0.20
0.15
0,30
0.25
0.14
X
0.40
0.60
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.30
0.40
0.20
0.4Q
0.40
0.40
0.4Q
0.50
0.80
0.40
0.40
0.50
0.43
0.14
YU
0.50
1.20
0.50
0.55
0.70
0,50
0.60
0.35
0.60
0.60
0.75
0.60
' 0.70
1.00
0.60
0.50
0.70
0,65
0.22
T
12
5
8
24
16
24
18
10
24
13
12
12
8
12
12.0
10.0
18. C
I*. 5
6.3
*
0
n
n
0
0
n
n
n
n
n
0
0
n
n
0.0
0 .n
r?.o
" . "
o.n
-------
POLLUTANT CODE » 1
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE a 7
PER CENT OF POP AFFECTEC » 90
POLLUTANT » OXIDANT
CATEGORY » INFLUENZA
ROUND
INCAPACITY
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
6
9
10
11
'is
13
14
15
16
MEDIAN
FI = ST Cl'AR
THIRD OUAB
ARITM VEAS
STANOAPC DEV
YL
0.80
O.So
2.00
1.30
0.60
0.50
0.90
0,30
1.00
.0.60
0.8o
0.8C
0.60
1.7Q
0.80
0.60
1.00
O.'l
0.47
X
1.00
1.40
3.00
1.90
1.20
0.80
1.00
. 0.80
l.*0
1.00
1.00
1.00
*
l.QO
1.9Q
1.00
1.00
1,40
1.31
0.60
YU
1.20
2,00
4,00
1.40
1.60
1.20
1.10
1.40
1.80
1.50
1.20
1.20
1,40
2.10
1.40
1.20
i.eo .
1.65
0.74
T
96
24
96
10
74
48
46
10
12
24
12
72
48
10
36.0
12-0
72.0
*1.7
32.1
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0,0
0.0
0.0
DISABILITY DISCOMFORT
YL
0.60
o.*o
0.60
0.65
0.60
0.30
0,60
0.20
0.60
0.30
0.*5
0.60
0.60
0.80
0.60
0.40
0,60
0.52
0.17
X
0,80
0.80
0.90
0.85
9,90
U.50
0,80
0.45
O.
i n
n
.1 0
1 i n
12.0 >! , n
1 ?.1 0.0
• - . o o.o
• - , o . n
• . ; o . n
-------
POLLUTANT CODE
POLLUTANT » OXIDANT
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE
PER CENT OF POP AFFECTED
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
a
9
10
11
•12
13
14
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST QUAP
THIPD QUAP
ARITH MEAN
STANDARD OEy
INCAPACITY
YL x
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.30
0.10
0,10
0.40
0.10
0.00
.0.00
0.10
0,00
0,20
0.15
0.13
0.10
0.20
0.15
0.12
0.30
0.30
0,40
0.50
0.20
0,30
0.50
0.15
0,20
0.10
0.30
0.10
*
0.4.0
0.25
0.30
0,20
0.40
0.29
0.13
e 3
0 0
YU
0,40
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.20
0,60
0,20
0.50
0.20
0.60
0.40
0,45
0.40
0.60 .
0.46
0.18
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0,0
0.0
0.0
0,0
0.0
CATEGO
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o.o
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
SY a UP R
ESH INFEC
DISABILITY
YL X
o.io.
0.10
0,10
0.20
0.05
0.10
0.20
0.05
0.00
0.00
0,10
0.00
0.10
0.10
0.10
0,05
0.10
0,09
0,06
0,20
9.30
0.30
0.40
0.20
0.20
0.30
0.10
0.20
0.10
0.20
0.10
0.30
0.20.
0,20
0.20
0.30
0.22
9.09
T
ROUND •
YU
0,30
0.40
0.50
0.70
0.30
0.30
0.40
0.15
0.40
0.20
0.30
0.20
0.50
O.i-0
0.35
0.30
0»40
0.36
0,14
2
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0,0
o.o
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
o.o
0.0
0,0
DISCOMFORT
YL x
0.00
0.10
0.10
0.00
0.05
0.05
0.00
0.05
0.00
0,00
0.00
0.00
0,00
0,00
0.00
0,00
0.05
0,03
0.04
0.10
0.20
0.20
0.10
0.10
0,10
0.10
0.10
0.20
0.10
0.10
0,10
0.10
0.10
0.1C
0,10
0.10
0.12
0.04
YU
0.20
0.30
0,30
0.20
0.20
0.15
0.20
0.15
0.40
0.20
0.20
0.20
'0,20
0.20
0.20
0,20
0.20
0.?2
0.07
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0,0
0,0
0.0
0,0
,
0
0
n
n
0
n
n
0
n
' n
0
0
n
n
0,0
O.n
o.n
O.n
O.n
-------
PAOC
30
POLLUTANT CODE a i
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE = s
POLLUTANT * OXIOANT
CATEC-C3Y a UP RESH INFECT
PER CENT CF POP AFFECTED
INCAPACITY
DOCTOR YL X
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
•12
13
1*
15
16
MEDIAN
FIPST QUA*
THIRD OUAP
ASIT* HFAN
STANDARD DEv
0.5Q
0.40
0.60
0.4Q
0,60
0.25
0.4Q
0,15
O.*0
0,30
0.55
O.*0
0.40
0.6o
0.40
0.4Q
0.55
0.&2
o.u
0«7Q
0,60
0,80
0.65
1 .00
0.40
0.60
0.55
0.60
0,50
0.70
0.60
0.60
0.60
0.62
0,60
o.sg
0.66
0.15
« 10
YU
0.90
1,20
1,00
0.90
1.40
0,60
0.80
1.15
1.20
o.eo
0.95
0.80
0,80
1.20
0.92
O.SO
1.20
0,98
0,22
T
36
48
20
36
24
' 48
48
16
48
24
20
24
36
72
36.0
24,0
48.0
35.7
15.7
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISABILITY
YL *
0.40
0.20
0.4Q
0.35
0.50
0.10
0.20
0.10
0.30
0.30
0.3^
0.25
'0.20
0,5o
0.30
0.20
o.*o
0.29
0.13
0.50
0.40
0.60
0.50
O.SO
0.30
0«4Q
0.30
0,60
0.50
Vo50
0.45
0.40
0,7o.
0,50
0,40
0.60
0.50
y.l*
ROUND i
YU
O.TO
1,00
0.80
0,85
1.20
0.40
0,60
0.45
0.90
0.70
0.75
0.65
0.60
1.10
0.72
0,60
0.90
0.76
0.23
B 2
T
2*
10
16
30
8
24
36
12
24
24
18
24
18
10
21.0
12.0
24.0
19.9
8.2
R '
0
0
0 .
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
o.o
0,0
0.0
DISCOMFORT
YL x
0.20
0.20
0.10
0.15
0.30
0.10
0.00
0.05
0.20
0.30
0.10
0.10
0,20
0.40
0.17
0.10
0,20
0,17
0.11
0«30
0.30
0,30
0.35
0.7Q
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.40
0.40
0.25
0.30
0,40
0,60
0.30
0,25
o.*o
0.35
0,15
YU
O.BO
O.fiO
0,50
0.55
1.00
0.30
0.40
0.40
0.60
0,70
0.55
0.50
'0.60
o.eo
0.55
O.Sn
0.?P
0.^9
0.19
T
24
5
8
24
8
24
24
8
24
18
12
12
12
12
12,0
8,0
?4,Q
15.4
7.3
a
0
n
0
n
0
0
a
0
0
' n
0
0
n
n
0,0
O.fi
0,0
0,n
O.o
-------
C4LIP AMH
POLLUTANT CODE » i
POLLUTANT » OXIOANT
POPULATION CATEGORY coot
PER CENT OF POo' AFFECTED
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST GUAR
THIRD QUAS .
ARITH MEAN
STANDARD OEV
INCAPACITY
YL x
0,70
0,60
0.90
0.65
0.65
0.3Q
0,60
0.20
0.60
0.60
0.80
0.65
0.60
I'.OO
0.62
0.60
0,70
0,63
0.20
0.90
1.00
1.20
0.95
1.10
0,50
0,80
0.60
1 .00
0 .SO
1.00
0.80
0.8Q
1 ,20
0,92
0.30
1.00
0.90
0,20
» 8
• 50
YU
1.10
1.60
1.50
1,25
1.50
0.70
1,00
1.15
1.40
1.20
1.30
1.05
1.00
1.40
1.22
1.05
1.40
1.23
0.25
T
36
48
26
48
24
48
43
15
48
24
24
24
36
72
36.0
24.0
48.0
37.2
15.5
CftTEGO
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0,0
o.o
0.0
RY a UP R
ESP INFECT
ROUND • 2
DISABILITY
YL *
0.50
0.40
0.60
0.50
0.55
0.25
0.40
0.10
0.40
O.*0
0.40
0.^0
0.40
0.70
0.40
o.*o
0.50
0.43
0.15
0.70
0.80
0.90
0.75
0.9Q
' 0.35
0.60
0.45
O.flO
U.60
0.65
0.60
0.60
0,90
0.67
0.60
0,30
0,69
0.17
YU
0.90
1.40
1.20
0.95
1.30
0.50
0.80-
0.85
1.20
1,00
0.9 =
0.80
0.80
1.10
0.95
0.80
1,20
0.98
0.24
T
24
10
20
36
e
24
36
12
24
24
18
24
18
10
22.0
12.0
24.0
20.6
8.8
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0,0
0,0
DISCONFOST
YL x
0.30
0.30
0.20
0.25
0.40
0.10
0.20
0.10
0,20
0,30
0.10
0.30
0,40
0.60
0.27
0,20
0.30
0.27
o.u
0,50
0.60
0.40
0,40
0.60
0.25
0.4Q
0.25
0.60
0.50
0.35
0,50
0,60
0,30
0.50
0.40
0.60
. 0.43
0.15
YU
0.70
1.20
0.60
0.55
0.9o
0.40
0.60
0.40
1.00
0.80
0.60
. 0.70
0.80
1.00
0.70
0.60
0.90
0.73
0.?3
T
24
5
16
24
8
24
24
9
24
18
15
12
12
12
15,5
12.0
?4.0
16.2
6.8
Q
n
0
n
n
0
0
n
0
0
1 0
0
0
0
0
O.o
O.o
O.o
0.0
0,0
-------
CALIF
POLLUTANT CODF. • i
POPULATION CATEGORY cooe • s
1"
PER CENT OF PC?'AFFECTED • 90
nor.
POLLUTANT » OXIDANT
CATEGORY » UP RESP INFECT
ROUND « 2
INCAPACITY
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST OUAR
ThIOD OL'AR
ARIT* MEAN
STANDARD DEV
YL
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.9Q
0.80
0.50
0.80
0.4Q
0,90
0.6Q
0,85
0.85
0.80
' 1.70
0.80
0.8o
0.55
0.33
0.30
X
1.20
1.20
1.20
1.30
1.30
0.80
1.00
0.80
1.20
1.00
1.20
1.05
*
1.00
1.90
1.20
1.00
1.20
1.15
0.27
YU
1.4Q
1.80
1.60
1.60
1.70
1.10
1.20
1.25
1,60
1 = 60
1.60
1.25
1.20
2.10
1.60
1.25
1,60
1.50
0.28
T
36
48
30
43
24
48
48
15
48
24
24
24
36
10
33.0
24,0
43,0
33.1
13.4
R
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0,0
0.0
0,0
0.0
0.0
DISABILITY
YL
O.GO
o.eo
0.60
0.85
0.60
0,30
0.60
0.15
0.65
0,60
0.60
0.65
0.60
0.80
0.60
0.60
o.en
0.61
0.19
X
. i .00
l.CO
I. 00
1.00
1.10
0.50
0.80
0.35
1.00
0.80
0.90
0,85
U.80
l.OC
0.95
0.8C
1.00
0,86
0.21
YU
1*20
1.60
1.40
1.25
1.40
0,70
1.00
0.95
1.45
1.20
1.20
1.05
1.00
1.20
1.20
1 .00
1.40
V.I 9
0-23
T
2*
10
2*
36
8
2*
36
12
24
IB
18
24
18
12
21.0
12.0
24.0
20.6
8,6
R
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o.c
0.0
0,0
0.0
o.o
DISCPMFORT
YL
0.4Q
0.60
0.50
0.20
0.50
0.10
0,60
0.10
0.60
0,60
0.50
0.25
0.40
0.70
0.50
0,25
0.60
0.43 .
0.20
X
0.50
0.80
0.90
0.60
0.80
0,40
t
0.70
0.30
1.00
0.70
0.70
0.40 .
0-60
0.90
0.70
0.50
0.30
0.66
0.21
YU
0.90
1.00
1.00
1.20
1.20
0.60
0.80
0.50
1.40
o.eo
1.00
0,55
•o.flo
1.10
0.95
0.80
1.10
0.9?
0.?6
T
48
2
12
6
4
24
24
1
12
4
6
12
6
24
9.0
4,0
2«,0
13.2
12.9
Q
n
n
0
n
0
n
n
n
n
0
n
0
n
n
0,1
o.n
0,n
O.n
O.n
-------
CALI?
POLLUTANT CODE • 1
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE a 9
4*
PER CENT OP POP AFFECTED « o
PAO?
POLLUTANT » OXIOAN?
CATEGORY • ASTHMA
POUND • 2
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
6
9
10
11
.12
13
1*
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST OUAR
THIRD QUAR
ARIT* M£AN
STANDARD DEV
INCAPACITY
YL X
0.20
0.00
0.30
0.3o
0.10
0,15
0.30
0.05
0,20
0,10
' 0.20
0,00
0,10
0.-10
0.13
0.10
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.30
0.20
0.50
0.50
0.20
0.30
o.*o
0.10
0.40
0.20
0.40
0.10
» 0,40
0.20
0.30
0,20
0.40
Ot3Q
O.H
YU
0.50
0.50
•0.70
0.70
0.30
0.45
0.50
0.15
0.60
0,30
0,50
0.15
0.70
0.30
0.50
0.30
0,60
0.45
0.19
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0,0
0.0
0^0
0,0
R
• 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0"
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0,0
0.0
DISABILITY
YL *
0.10
0.00
0.30
0.20
0.05
0.10
o.io
0.05
0.05
0.10
0.10
0.00
'0.20
0.05
0.10
0.05
0,10
0. 10
0.08
0.20
0.10
0.40
0.30
0,10
0.20
U.20
0.10
0.20
U.20
0,20
0.10
0.30
U.10
0.20
0,10
0.20
U.I 9
0.09
YU
0.30
0.46
0.50
0.40
0.20
0.30
0.30
0.15
0.40
0,30
0,30
0.15
0.40
0.15
0.30
0.20
0.40
0.30
0.11
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
000
0.0
o.o
0.0
0.0
R
0
0
~:o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0,0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISCOMFORT
YL x
0.05
0.00
0,10
0.00
0.05
0,05
0,00
0.00
0,05
0.05
0,00
0.00
0,00
0.05
0.03
0,00
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.10
0.10
0.20
0.05
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.05
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.11
0.04
YU
o.?o
0.30
0.30
0.10
0.20
0.15
0.20
0.10
0.40
0,20
0.20
0.15
0.20
0.15
0.20
0.15
0,20
o.?n
o.os
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
o.o
0.0
a
0
n
n
n
fl
o
0
0
0
• o
0
0
n
. 0
O.o
o.n
o.o
O.n
O.o
-------
PCLIU7ANT CODE « 1
POLLUTANT s OXIOANT
POPULiT ION' CAT£(
!
P£R CE.NT OF POP
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
3
9
10
11
:i2
13 '
14
15
16
MEDIAN
FISST OUAS
THJ8" Q'JAC •'
ABIT* M£iN
STANOAPp OEV
50RY CQOt
AFFECTED
INCAPACITY
YL x
0.40
0.3Q
0,30
0.4Q
O.*0
0.25
0.4Q
0.15
0.4Q
0.4Q
0.35
0.4Q
0.4Q
0.70
0,40
0.30
0.40
0,38
0.12
0.60
0.50
0.70
0.60
0.70
0,40
0.60
0.30
0.80
0.60
0.60 '
0,60
0.60
1,00
0,60
0.60
0.70
0,61
0.17
3 9
a 10
YU
0,60
0.80
1.10
0,80
1.10
0.55
0.80
. 0.60
1.20
1.00
1.00
0.80
0.80
1.40
0,80
0.50
1.10
0,91
0,23
CATEGORY a ASTHMA
T
24
10
18
16
24
24
72
19
2*
36
20
36
24
24
24.0
19.0
24.0
26,5
14,8
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0,0
0,0
DISABILITY
YL X
0.30
0.20
0.15
0.25
0,30
0.10
0,20
0.10
0.30
0.30
0.20
0.30 '
0.20
0.10
0.20
0.15
0.30
0.21
0.08
0,50
0.30
0.50
0.40
0.60
0.25
0.40
0.25
0.60
u.50
0.40
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.40
0.30
0.50
0.42
0.12
POUND
YU
'0.70
0.80
0,80
0.60
1.00
0.35
0.60
0.45
1.00
0.70
0,60
0,70
0.60
0.60
0.65
0.60
n.so
0.68
0.18
s 2
T
18
10
12
10
12
2*
48
12
8
24
16
24
12
16
14,0
12.0
24.0
17.6
10.3
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
o.o
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISCOMFORT
YL * x
0,30
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.25
0.10
0.00
0.10
0.10
0.30
0,05
0.10
0.20
0,10
0.10
0.10
0.20
0.14
0.09
o.*o :
0.20
0.30
0.30
0.4Q
0.20
0.20
0.15
0.40
0.40
0.15
0.30
0.30
0.30
0.30
0.20
0.40
0.29
0.09
YU
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.65
0.85
0.30
0.40
0.30
1.00
0.60
0.30
0.50
0.40
0.55
0.5,
0.40
0.^0
0.5?
0.20
T
8
*'
t
•J
6
24
?4
8
12
13
9
12
6
8
*.!)
6. 0
i ,' • "•
11.1
h. •«
R
n
n
n
n
n
0
0
ft
0
ft
0
0
0
n
O.n
0.0
0.0
O.n
0.0
-------
AHM
J'J
POLLUTANT CODE o 1
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE • 9
PEP CENT OF POP AFFECTED « 50
POLLUTANT a OXIDANT
CATEGORY » ASTHMA
ROUND
DOCTOR
2
3
*
5
7
8
9
10
11
12
13'
14
15
16
MEDIAN
FI=ST QUAP
T*I°D QL'fiR
AR!7"i M£A\
STAN-OARO DEV •
INCAPACITY
YL x
o.?o
0.40
0.4Q
0.55
0,70
0.30
0.60
0.15
0.60
0.5Q
0.70
0.60
0.60
1,40
0,60
O.*0
0.70
0.59
0.28
0.90
0,60
o'.so
0.65
1.10
0.50
0.60
C.40
1.00
0,80
1.00
0.80
»
0.80
1,60
0.80
0.80
1.00
0,85
0.29
YU
1.10
1.20
1.20
1.30
1,50
0.70
1.00
0.80
1,40
1.20
1.30
1,00
1,00
1.90
1,20
1.00
1.3*
1.19
0.30
T
36
10
24
24
24
48
72
12
24
36
20-
36
24
24
24.0
24.0
36,0
29.6
15.8
R
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0,0
0.0
0.0
0,0
DISABILITY
YL *
0«&0
0.30
0.30
O.fc5
0.50
0.25
0.40
0,15
O.»0
0.40
0.50
0.40
0.40
0.70
0.^0
0.20
0.50
0,41
0.14
o.7n
0.50
0.60
0,70
0.90
0.35
0,60
0.30
o.eo
0.60
0.75
0.60
0.60
0.90
0.60
0.60
0.75
0.64
U,l8
YU
" 0«90
l.on
0.90
1.00
1.20
0.50
0.80 .
0.50
1.20
1.00
1.10
0.80
0.80
1.15
0.95
0.80
1.10
0.9-2
0-22
T
2*
10
18
20
12
48
46
10
8
16
16
24
12
16
17.0
12.0
2^.0
20,3
12.7
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o.o
0.0
0.0
0.0
o.o
DISCOMFORT
YL x
0.40
0.10
0,10
0.25
0,30
0,10
0.20
0,10
0.20
0,30
0.35
0.15
0.30
0.40
0.23
0.10
0.30
0.23
0,11
0.50
C.30
0,30
0.40
0.70
0,30
0.40
0.15
0,60
0.50
0.50
0.35
0.40
0.60
0.40
0.30
0.50
0.43
0.15
YU
0.60
0.60
0,50
0.75
1.10
0.40
!0.60
0.25
1,00
0.70
0.80
.0.5"
0..60
O.S5
0,60
0,55
O.PO
0.66
0«?^
T
12
5
10
12
6
48
24
8
12
18
9
12
6
8
u.o
e.o
i /•> . n
'• \.l>
'.'..!
R
0
n
0
0
n
0
0
n
0
' n
0
n
0
0
O.o
0,0
0,0
o.o
o « n
-------
POLLUTANT CODE « i
POPULATION CATEOG^r CODE » 9
PER CENT OF POP AFFECTED « <50
POlLUTANT • OX1DANT
CATEGORY « ASTHMA
ROUND » 2
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
•12
13
1*
15
16
MEDICS
FIRST GUAR
THIBO Qo'AR
AS IT" MEAN
STANQafiQ OEV
INCAPACITY
YL x
O.BO
0.40
0.60
0.95
0.80
0.50
o.ao
0.20
0.80
0.60
0,95
0.80
0.80
•1.80
0.80
0.60
0.80
0,77
0,36
1 -00
0.80
1.00
1.20
1,20
0.80
1.00
0.45
1,20
1.00
1.20
1,00
*
1.20
2,00
1,00
1.00
1.20
1.07
0.34
YU
1.20
1.40
1.40
1.65
1,60
1.10
1.20
0.70
1.80
1.40
1.55
1.20
1.60
2.20
1.40
1,20
1.60
1.43
0.36
T
36
10
30
24
24
4fl
72
12
24
36
20
36
24
24
24,0
24.0
36.0
30.0
15.7
R
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0,0
0.0
0.0
c.o
DISABILITY
YL *
o«?o
0.30
0,40
0.55
0.70
0.30
0.60
0.10
0.60
0.60
0.70
0.60
' 0.60
1.30
0.60
0.40
0,70
0.57
0.28
y«9o
0.50
0,80
0.70
1.10
• 0.50
0.80
0.35
1.00
0.80
1.00
0,80
0,80
1,50
0.90
0.70
1.00
O.S2
0.29
YU
1-10
1.00
1.20
1.15
1.50
0.70
1.00
0.55
1.40
1.20
1.35
1.00
\ .00
1.70
i.:3
1.00
1.35
1-.13
0.30
T
24
10
20
•20
12
48
48
10
8
•24
16
24'
12
16
18.0
12.0
24.0
20. <5
12.7
R
0
0
0
d
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o.c
0.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
OISCPMFORT
YL x
0.40
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.60
0.30
0.40
0.15
0.45
0.30
0,50
0.30
0.40
0.70
0.35
0.30
0.45
0.36
0.17
0.60
0.40
0.40
0.50
1.00
0.40
i
0.6o
0.20
0.80
0.60
0.75
0.50
0.60
0.90
0.60
0.40
0.75
0.59
0.22
YU
O.PO
O.BO
0.60
O.RS
1.30
0.50
o.en
0.30
1.40
1.00
1.10
0.70
0.80
1.10
0.80
0.70
1.10
0.86
0.30
T
12
5
10
12
6
48
24
e
12
18
9
12
6
8
11.0
8.0
12.0
13,6
11*1
R
n
n
n
0
n
0
n
n
0
0
0
0
0
n
O.n
O.n
O.n
O.n
O.n
-------
AR.I
POLLUTANT CODE •» i
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE » 10
PER C£\T Or POP' AFFECTED « 0
P43F
POLLUTANT » OXIDANT
CATEGORY a VIRAL BRONCHITIS
ROUND a 2
"DOCTOR
2
4
5
7
8
1 0
1 1
;12
13
14
1 5
16
:01AN
I R S T G U A 0
' ! - 0 G U A =
JTTW LJ*~Ak>
! I T ^ M £ A \
'A'JOARp C-EV
INCAPACITY
YL . x
0.20
o.oo
0,30
0.4Q
0.05
0.15
o.io
0.10
o.oo
0.20
0.05
0.00
0.30
0,10
0.10
0.05
0 . .2 0
0.14
0.13
0.30
0.20
0.50
0.50
0.10
0.30
0.20
0.15
0.40
0.6Q
0.20
0.10
» 0.4Q
0,30
0.30
0.20
0.40
0.30
0.16
YU T R
0,40 0 0
0.60 0 0
0,70 0 0
0.60 0 0
0,20 0 0
0,45 o 0
0.30 0 0
0,20 0 0
0,60 0 0
0.80 - -0 0
0,50 0 0
0.15 o 0
0.50 0 0
0,50 0 0
0,50 0,0 0,0
0.30 0,0 0.0
0.60 0.0 0.0
0.46 o.O 0,0
0.20 0.0 0.0
DISABILITY
YL *
0.20
0.00
0,10
0.20
0.0s
0.10
0.00
0.0s
0,00
o.io
0.05
o.oo
0.10
0.10
0.08
o.oo
o.io
0.07
0.07
0.30 -
0.20
0.30
0.30
0.10
0.20
0.10
0.10
U.20
0.40
0,20
°.10
0,30
0.20
0,20
« .3 0
0.30
°.?1
0.09
YU
0.40
0.40
0.60
0.40
0.20
0.30
0.20
0.15
0.40
0.70
0.30
0.15
0.50
0.30
0.35
0.20
0.40
0.3&
0.16
T R
0 0
0 0
'o o
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 .0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0.0 0,0
0.0 0,0
0,0 0.0
0.0 0.0.
0.0 0.0
DISCOMFORT
YL x
0,00
0,00
0,05
0.00
0.05
0.05
0.00
0,05
0,00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0,00
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.02
0,02
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0,10
0,10
o.oo '
0.10
0,20
0.20
0.10
0.10 .
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.11
0.05
YU
0.20
0.30
0,30
0.20
O.?0
0.15
0.10
o. 15
0,40
0.4n
0.20
0.15
•0.20
0.20
0.20
0,15
0,30
0,23
0.09
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
0,0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
R
0
0
0
o
n
0
n
n
n
' n
n
n
o
0
o,n
0 . n
0.0
0 , n
O.n
-------
POLLUTANT coo£ « 1
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE • io
PER CENT OF POO iFFECTEO a 10
POLLUTANT • OXIDANT
CATEGORY B VIRAL BRONCHITIS
ROUND
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
e
9
. 10
1 1
12
13
14
15
16
MEDIAN
FT3ST QUAR
7 H i = 0 C U A R
45I7H MEAN-
STANDARD OEV
INCAPACI
YL
0«5o
0.40
0.4Q
0.50
0.60
0.25
0.30
0.10
0.20
0.4Q
0.20
0,40
O.*0
6.40
0,40
0,25
0,40
0.36
0.14
TY
X
. 0«60
0.60
0.60
0.70
1.00
0.40
0.40
0.50
0,60
0,80
0 ,60
0,60
*
0.80
0.70
0,60
0.60
0.70
0,6*
0.16
YU
0«80
0.80
0.80
1.00
1.20
0.55
0.50
0.90
1.00
1.00
0.90
0.80
1.20
1.00
0.90
0.90
1,00
0.89
0.20
T R
96 6
24 0
72 0
12 0
24 0
24 0
43 0
2 0
24 0
24 0
12 0
72 0
24 0
12 0
24.0 0,0
12.0 0.0
ftB.O 0.0
33,6 0,0
27,7 0,0
DISABILI
YL
o,*o
0.20
0.30
o.4o
0.30
0.10
0.20
0.10
0.20
o.4o
0.10
0.25
0.30
0.30
0,27
0«20
0.30
0.25
0.11
TY
A
u.50
0.40
0,50
O.feO
0.40
0.25
0.30
0.20
0.40
0.60
0,30
0.40
0.50
0.50
0.40
0,30
0,50
0.42
0.12
YU
" 0«80
0.60
0.70
0.80
0.60
0,35
o.4o.
0,30
0.60
0.80
0.60
0.55
0.70
0.70
0.65
0.55
0.80
0*62
0.17
T R
48 0
4 0
24 0
24 0
4 0
24 0
12 0
1 0
12 0
.4 0.
12 0
24 0
4 0
18 0
12.0 0,0
4.0 0.0
24.0 0,0
15,4 0,0.
12.8 0.0
DISCOMFORT
YL •' x
0.20
0.10
0,20
0,10
0,30
0.10 '
0.20
0,10
0.05
0.20
0.10
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.15
0.10
0,20
0.16
0.08
0«30
0.30
0,30
0.30
0.40
0.20
0.40
0.15
0.30
0.^0
0.30
0.25
0.30
0.40
0,30
0.30
0.40
0.31
0.08
YU T B
0*40 8 0
O.TO 5 ft
O.*0 8 ft
0.7«; 8 ft
O.Sl 12 n
8.11 24 ft
! t.«.-s 18 ft
«O1 6 0
X.-.=. 24 ft
l.M 19 'ft
t.'.i 12 n
I . O 24 0
l.Vl 6 ft
I.-.1 20 ft
U'.-l 12.0 O.ft
v-»i 3.0 O.n
l". =ii1 ?0.0 0,0
1 : o i . , a. 0 , ft
i . -, * .1 o.n
-------
POLL'JU'.'T COCE a 1
POPULATION CiTr-30sY COOt » 10
PER CENT or POP aFFECTEO a 50
POLLUTANT a OXJDANT
CATE3CSY a VIPAL BRONCHITIS
ROUND
DOCTOR
"ED I A
FIRST
TMJOO
ARITH
2
3
4
5
7
a
9
10
n
12
13
U
15
16
H
QUA*
GO*"
M£AN
STAN/DAPS Ocv
INCAPACITY
YL
0.70
0.60
1.50
0,60
0.80
0.30
0.50
0. 10
0.50
0.50
0.6Q
0.60
0.7o
.0.60
0.6Q
0.50
0.7Q
0.61
0,31
X
0.90
0.80
' 0.80
0,90
1.20
0.50
' 0.7o
0.60
1.00
0,90
0.8o
0.80
1.10
0.90
0.85
0.30
o.'o
0.85
0,18
YU
1.20
1,20
1,10
1.20
1 ,60
0.70
0.90
1.10
1,50
1.30
1.10
1.00
1.40
1.30
! .20
1,10
1,30
1,18
0.23
T
96
24
96
12
24
24
43
1
24
24
.12
72
24
12
24,0
12,0
48,0
35.2
30.9
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0,0
0.0
0.0
0.0
CISABI
YL
0.60
0,20
0.40
0,50
0.30
0.20
0.40
0,10
0,40
0.30
0.20
0.35
' 0.^0
0,50
0,38
0,20
O.'-O
0.35
0.1*
LITY
A
0.80 '
0.60
0.60
0.70
0.50
0,35
0.50
0.30
0.80
0.50
0.60
0.50
0.50
0,90
0.55
0.50
0.7Q
0.57
0.16
DISCOMFORT
YU
1.00
1.00
0.60
0.90
0,70
0.50
0.60
0.50
1.20
0.80
0.80
0.65
0.70
1 .00
O.HO
0,65
1.00
a, 90
0.21
T
48
4
48
10
4
24
12
1
12
. 4
12
24
4
16
12,0
4.0
24.0
16.1
15.4
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0,0
o.b
0,0
0.0
0.0
YL
0.30
0.20
0.30
0.20
0.20
0.15
0.30
0.10
0.10
0.30
0.20
0.20
0.30
0.50
0,20
0.20
0.30
0.24
0.10
X
0.40
0.50
0.40
0.40
0.40
0.30
0,40 !
0.20
0.40
0,50
0.40
0.40
0.50
0.70
0.4Q
0,4Q
0,50
0.*2
0.11
YU
0.50
0.80
0.50
0.70
0,60
0.35
0.50
0.35
0,70
0,80
0.60
0.60
'0.70
1.00
0.60
0.50
0.7o
O.ft 2
0.16
T
8
5
8
12
12
24
18
7
24
18
12
2»
6
34
12.0
a . o
?
-------
POLLUTANT CODE « i
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE » 10
i"
PER CENT OF POP'AFFECTED a 90
POLLUTANT ° OXIOANT
CATEGORY • VISAL BRONCHITIS
ROUND
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
:i2
13
14
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST QUAR
THI=D QUA3
-KITH M E - *•
STANDARD CEV
INCAPACITY
YL x
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
c
,80
.00
.80
.85
.80
.50
. 00
.25
.60
.60
.10
,30
.80
.70
.30
.60
.00
.53
.33
1.00
1.20
1.20
1.20
1.30
0.80
1.20
0.35
1 .20
1.00
1.40
1,00
t1.20
1,90
1.20
1.00
1.20
1.17
0.27
YU
1.20
1.70
1.60
1.75
1.65
1.10
1.40
1.35
i.ao
1.4Q
1.60
1.30
1 .60
2.10
1 .60
1.35
1.70
1.54
0.?7
T
24
36
30
48
24
48
43
16
43
36
24
36
36
30
36.0
24.0
4B.O
34.6
10,6
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISABILITY
YL *
O.TO
0.60
0.60
0,80
0.40
0,30
0.7o
0.10
0.50
0.5o
0.40
0.40
0.60
0,70
0.55
0-40
0.70
0.52
0.19
0.80
0,80
1.00
1.00
;0.70
0,50
0.80
0.40
1.00
o.ao
0.80
0.60
0.80
1,10
0.80
U.7Q
1.00
0,79
0.20
YU
1.00
1.40
1.40
1.20
1.00
0.70
0,90
0.80
1.50
1.20
1.10
o.so
1.00
1.40
1,05
0.90
1,40
1.10
0.26
T
96
4
48.
10
4
24
12
0
12
4
12
24
4
18
12.0
4.0
24.0
19.4
25,3
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0 •
0.0
DISCOMFORT
YL . x
0.40
0.50
0.30
0,30
0,30
0.30
0.60
0.10
0.40
0.30
0.30
0.35
0,40
0.60
0.32
0,30
0.40
0.37
0.13
0.60
0.70
0.50
0,60
0.50
0.40
0.80
0.30
0,70
0.50
0.60
0.55
0.7Q
1.00
0.60
0.50
0.70
0,60
0.17
YU
0.80
1.30
0.70
0.85
0.70
0.50
, 0.90
0.50
1.00
0.8Q
1.00
0.80
1.00
1.20
O.P2
0.7Q
l-.no
O.P6
0.23
T
e
5
10
12
12
24
18
8
24
18
12
24
6
20
12,0
8. 0
?0.0
14.4
6.9
R
0
0
a
0
0
0
n
0
n
' 0
0
n
n
0
O.o
O.i
O.o
0,o
O.n
-------
CAL!'
POLLUTANT CODE « i
POPULATION CATEOOBY CODE « 11
PER CENT OF POP AFFECTED * 0
POLLUTANT « OXIOANT
CATEGORY » BACT. PNEUMONIA
ROUND a 2
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
U
15
16
U-EQI"'.'
FI=?ST GUAR
THIP.D Q'UAR
APIT-. UEAS
STANDARD DEV
INCAPACITY
YL x
0-20
0.00
0,30
0.60
0.05
0.05
0.10
0.10
0.20
0,20
0.30
0,00
0.20
0'. 10
0.15
0.05
0.20
0,17
0.16
Ot30
0.20
0.60
0«80
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.15
0.40
0.60
0.40
0.10
*
0.40
0.30
0.30
0,15
O.«0
0.34
0»21
YU T R
O.*0 0 6
0.80 0 0
O.SO 0 0
1.00 0 0
0.20 0 0
0.25 0 0
0.30 0 0
0,25 0 0
0,60 0 0
1,00 0 0
0.50 0 0
0.20 0 0
0.60 0 0
0,50 0 0
0.50 0.0 0.0
0.25 0.0 0.0
O.SO 0.0 0.0
0.54 o.O 0.0
0.29 0.0 0.0
DISABILITY
YL X
0-20
0.00
0.20
0<10
0.05
0.05
o.oo
0.10
0.00
0,20
0.20
0.00
0.10
C.lO
o.io
0.00
0.20
0.0o 0
C,M 0
I . > 1 0
'. • ' \ 0.0
i • ' i o.o
'.-.-I 0.0
i . •'" 0.0
' • ~. 3.0
a
n
0
0
n
0
n
0
n
n
' 0
0
0
n
0
0,0
0.0
o.o
O.o
0.0
-------
CAL1'
POLLUTANT CODE « i
POPULATION CATEGORY ccot » u
P£a CENT OP PO? AFFECTED „ 10
POLLUTANT • OXIDANT
CATEGORY » SACT. PNEUMONIA
POUND
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
12
' 13
1*
15
16
MEDIAN
F"1SST Q'JAP
THIPO G'J45
A P ! T H " £ A •.,•
STANDARD DEV
INCAPACITY
YL x
O.*0
0,40
0.30
1.00
0.60
0.10
0.3o
0.20
0.4Q
0.6Q
0,60
0,45
0.60
•0.40
0.*2
0,4Q
0.60
0.^9
0.23
0«60
0.60
0.90
1.20
0,90
0.20
0.40
1.10
0.80
0,90
0.70
0.60
*
1 ,00
0.70
0.75
0.60
0.90
0.75
0.27
YU
0.30
2.00
1,00
1.40
1 ,20
0,30
0.50
1.50
1 .20
1.00
0.90
0.75
1.40
1.00
1 ,00
0.30
1 .40
1.07
0.43
T
96
24
72
13
24
48
72
2
12
24
12
72
24
12
24,0
12.0
72.0
36.2
29,9
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
o.c
0,0
0.0
0.0
DISABILITY
YL *
0«30
0,30
0.30
0.30
0.30
0.10
0.20
0.15
0.20
0.30
0.25
0.30
' 0.20
0.30
0.30
0«20
0.30
0.25
0.07
V ,40
0.50
U.50
0.45
0.60
V.15
0.40
0.30
U.50
V.50
' 0.50
0.50
0.30
0.50
0.50
0.4Q
0.50
0.44
0.12
YU
0«60
I. 00
0.70
0.75
1.00
0.20
0.&0
0,45
0.80
0,80
0.75
0.65
0.42
0.70
0.70
0.60
0.80
0-.67
0.22
T
10
10
16
48
16
24
48
8
12
18
12
?4
12
18
17.0
12.0
24.0
19.9
12.9
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
o.o
0.0
0.0
o.o
OlSCpMFORT
YL x
0.20
0.20
0.10
0.10
0.30
0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.30
0.05
0.10
0.20
0.20
0.10
0.05
0.20
0.14
0.09
0.30
0.30
0.30
0.30
0.50
0.10
0.20 !
0.15 .
0.30
0.40
0.25
0,30
0.30
0.40
0.30
0,25
0,30
0.29
0.10
YU
0.50
O.SO
0.50
0.45
0.70
0.15
0.40
0.35
0.50
0.60
0.55
0.40
.0.40
0.60
0.50
0.4Q
0.60
0.*9
0.1*.
T
6
5
8
18
16
24
24
6
12
18
8
12
6
20
12.0
6.0
18.0
13.1
6.9
f»
n
0
0
0
n
n
n
0
n
• n
0
0
n
n
O.o
O.n
0,0
0,1
O.n
-------
PAQf
POLLUTANT COOt • 1
POPULATION CATEGORY coof. • ii
*'
PER CE^ OF POP AFFECTED B 50
POLLUTANT • OXIOANT
CATEGORY « BACT. PNEUMONIA
ROUND a
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
•12
'13
U
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST QUAP
THIRD auAP
APITH MEAN
STANQAPp C£V
INCAPACITY
YL x
0.60
0.60
1.60
1.00
/
0,70
0.15
0.40
0.20
0.90
O.So
0.7Q
0.55
0,80
0.60
0.65
0,55
O.So
C.68
0,35
0.80
0.80
1.70
1.50
1.00
0.30
0.50
0.70
1.20
1.00
0.90
0,95
*
l.*0
0.90
0.92
0.80
1,20
0.97
0.33
YU
1.00
2.00
1.80
1 .90
1.40
0.45
0,60
1.10
1 .60
1,50
1.10
0,90
2,00
1.20
1.30
1.00
l.SO
1.32
0.50
T
96
24
96
13
24
48
72
2
12
24
12
72
24
12
?*.o
12.0
72.0
37.9
32.7
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0,0
0,0
0,0
o.o
0.0
DISA9ILITY
YL *
0.40
O.*0
0.40
0.30
o.*o
o.io
0.40
0.15
O.*0
O.*0
0.40
0.40
0.30
0.50
0«*0
0.30
0,*n
0«35
0.11
0.60
0.60
0.70
0.60
0.65
• 0.15
0.60
0.35
0.70
0.60
0.70
0.60
0.50
V.HO
0.60
0.60
0.70
C.58
0.16
YU
O.SO
1.20
1.00
0.80
1.00
0.30
0.80
0.65
1.10
1.00
1.00
0.80
0,70
1.00
0 .90
o.flft
1.00
Oi37
0.23
T
16
10
20
48
16
24
48
10
12
24
12
24
12
18
17.0
15,0
24,0
21.0
12.5
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
o.o
o.c
DISCQMF
YL
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.30
0.05
0.20
0.10
0.25
0.20
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.50
0.20
0.20
0.25
0.21
0.11
ORT
X
0.40
0,40
0.40
0,50
0.60
0.10
0.40 !
0.20
0.50
0,40
0.35
0.40
0.50
0.70 -
O.'O
0.40
0.50
0«42
0.15
YU
0.60
1.00
0.60
O.fiO
0.90
0.15
0.60
0.35
O.PO
o.an
0.65
0.60
0,70
1.00
0.67
0.60
O.fiO
0 .68
0.23
T
\Z
5
8
24
16
24
24
6
12
IS
8
12
6
2*
12.0
8.0
?4.0
14.2
7.4
a
n
0
0
0
n
0
0
0
0
• r>
n
0
n
n
O.o
O.o
0,0
0. 0
o.n
-------
"OLLUTANT CODE
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
.'12
13
14
15
16
.'« «"o, „/.,„;;;;;;;
INCAPACITY
0.7Q
o.so
2.00
1.40
0.8o
0.25
0.6o
0.30
1.2o
l.Oo
1.00
0.8o
1.20
1.30'
POLLUTANT . OXIOANT
CATEGORY a 8ACT<
"Aar 44
0.90
0.7o
1.20
0.95
0.46
X yU T R DISABlUTy
" YL »
1.00 , ,ft L *
1§'20 96 o
1.00 ? Ofl ° °'70 0.80
20 0
3.00 4 Ofl °'6° 0.80
*.00 96
J'°° *.,„ ,3 '•" '"5°
'•" .... 24 °'5° •"«
«•«• o.55 48 ; °-3' ».»
••'• .... 7J °>is ••»
»-6» ,.„, , ° o>*° ?•'«
'•» a.oo la ° . °-'° "•'»
'•5» 3.0, ,. ' °'e° '•«••
'•» ...o 18 ° 0<5° °-8«
'- .... „ ° 0-7° "•"
••••• «... „ °"5 •••«
'"« U70 ,. ° '"*0 °"»
° °'7» 1.10
l.Pn
"UUNQ a 2
r R . ?LIS
l"° '6 • o.6C
1.40 -4
0 O.eo
1.60 48 -
0 . 1.00
1.10 11
11 ° o.io
0.70 4
0 0.30
°'35 '•• • ..,.
0.60 ? .
2 ° 0.05
0.60 a
2 ° 0.05
1<6° 12 On
0 0.60
1.30 . 4
0 0.50
K3° 1J » ..„
'"5 » • o.,5
0,8o 4
0 0.20
Jf&0 18 0
0 0.60
1.00
1 .60
1.32
0.66
< «.o o.o
12° ?*-0 0,0
°'8° 13.5 o.o
°*4° 13.5 o.n
-------
POLLUTANT CODE » 1
POLLUTANT o OXIOANT
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE
l"
PER CENT OF POP AFFECTED
DOCTOR
2
.3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
;i2
13
1*
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST QUAO
THIRD QUAR
ARITH MEAN
STANDARD DEV
INCAPACITY
YL X
0.20
0,20
0,20
0.30
0.10
0.25
0.30
0.10
0.20
o.oo
0.20
0,00
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.10
0.20
0.16
0.09
0.30
0.40
0,50
0.50
0.15
0,45
o.4o
0.30
0,40
0.20
o.4o
0.10
*
0.30 .
0.30
0.35
0.30
0.40
0,34
0.12
8 12
» 0
YU
0.60
1.00
0.90
0.70
0.20
0,60
0.50
0.50
0.60
0.40
0.60
0.15
0.50
0.40
0.55
0.40
0.60
0.55
0.23
CATEGORY » CHRONIC RESP
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
R
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISABILITY
YL *
0.10
0.20
0.10
0.10
0.05
0.15
0.20
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.10
0.00.
'0.00
0.10
0.10
0.00
0.10
0,09
0.07
V.20
0.40
0.30
0.30
0.10
U.25
0.30
0.20
V.20
0.20
0.30
0.10
0.20
0.20 .
0.20
0.20
0.30
0.23
0.08
DIS
ROUND «
YU
0.40
0.60
0.50
0.50
0.20
0.35
0.40
0.30
0.40
0.40
0,50
0.15
0.40
0,30
O.<»0
0.30
0.50
0.39
0.12
' 2
T '
Q
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
• 0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISCOMFORT
YL x
0,05
0,00
0.00
0.00
0.05
0,00
0.00
0.05
0,00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
0,00
0.00
. 0.05
0.01
0.02
0.10
0.20
0,05
0.10
0.10
0,05
0.10
0.10
0.20
0,20
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.11
0.05
YU
0.20
0.60
0.10
0.20
0.20
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.4Q
0.30
0.15
0.-20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.30
0.25
0.14
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
a
0
n
0
0
0
n
n
n
n
' n
n
0
0
n
O.n
0.0
0,n
0,o
0,o
-------
ARM
POLLUTANT CODE « 1
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE = 11
PER CENT OF POP' AFFECTED • 90
POLLUTANT a OXIOANT
CATEGORY » BACT.
POUND • 2
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
6
9
10
11
•12
13
14
15
16
MEDIAN
FI»ST QU^o
T H I P 3 Q U fi 3
A p j T i M F ; A .'.
STAMOi»0 C£V
INCAPACITY
YL x
0.70
0.80
2.00
1.40
0.80
0.25
0,60
0.30
1,20
1-.00
1.00
0.80
1.20.
1.30
0.9Q
0.7o
1,20
0.95
0.*6
1.00
1.00
3,00
2.00
1.20
0.40
0,70
0.60
1.60
1.50
1.20
1.00
*
1.80-
1.50
1.20
1.00
1 ,60
1,32
0.66
YU
1.-20
2.00
4.00
2.60
1.60
0,55
o.eo
1.20
2.00
2.00
1.40
1.20
2.40
1.70
1.65
1.20
2.00
1.76
O.S7
T
96
20
96
13
24
48
72
1
12
24
12
72
24
12
24.0
12.0
72.0
37.6
32.9
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0,0
0,0
0.0
0,0
DISABILITY
YL *
0.70
0.60
1.4Q
0.50
0.30
0.15
0.40
0.10
0.80
0.50
0.70
0.45
o.*o
0.70
0.50
0.40
0.70
0.55
0.32
0.80
9.80
1.50
0.90
0.50
0.25
0.30
0.30
1.20
0.80
0.90
0.60
0.60
1.10 •
o.fio
0.50
0.90
0.75
0.36
YU
1.00
1.40
1.60
1.10
0.70
0.35
0.60
0.60
1.60
1.30
1.30
0.75
0.80
1.40
1.05
0.70
1.40
1 .04
0.41
T
96
4
48
11
4
48
2
2
12
. 4
12
24
4
18
11.5
4.0
24.0
20.6
26.7
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o.o
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISCOMFORT
YL x
0.60
0.20
1.00
0.10
0,30
0.10
0.05
0.05
0.60
0.50
0.50
0.25
0.20
0.60
0.27
0.10
0.60
0.36
0.28
0.70
0.60
1.10
0.40
0.50
0.20
0.15
0.15
1.00
0,70
0.70
0.40
0.30
0.80
0.55
0.30
0.70
0.55
0.30
YU
0.80
1.20
1.20
0.9ft
0.7Q
0.30
0.25
0.25
1.40
1.10
0.90
0.55
d.40
1.20
0.85
0.40
1.20
0.80
0.40
T
48
4
24
9
4
24
2
2
12
4
6
24
2
24
7.5
4.0
24,0
13.5
13.5
R
n
0
n
0
n
0
n
n
0
1 n
n
ft
n
0
O.ft
0.0
0.0
0.0
O.ft
-------
POLLUTANT CODE « 1
POPULATION CATEGO^ COCE = 12
<'
PER CENT Or P0= AFFECTED a o
POLLUTANT
CATEGORY » CHRONIC RESP DIS
ROUND » 2
INCAPACITY
DOCTOR YL X
2 0.20 0.30
3 0,20
4 0,20
5 0.3o
7 0.10
B 0.25
9 0.30
10 0.10
11 0.20
;12 0.00
13 0.20
14 0,00
15 0.10
16 0.15
MEDIAN 0.20
FIRST OL'AR 0.10
THIRD QUA? 0.20
ARIT- MEAN 0.16
s"ANji?r; OEV 0.09
0.40
0,50
0.50
0.15
0 .45
0.4Q
0.30
0,40
0,20
0.40
Q . 1 0
0.30
0.30
0.35
0 .30
0»40
0.34
Q.I 2
YU
0.60
1,00
0.90
0.70
0.20
0.60
0.50
0.50
0.60
0.40
0.60
0.15
0.50
0.40
0.55
0.40
n,60
0.55
0.23
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0 .0
'.0,0
0.0
0.0
R
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
G.O
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISABILITY
YL *
o.io v?o
0.20
0.10
0.10
0.05
0.15
0.20
0.10
O.On
0.00
0,10
0,00
'0.00
0.10
0.10
o.oo
0.10
0,09
0.07
0.40
0.30
0,30
0.10
V.25
0.30
0.20
y.2o
0.20
0.30
0,10
0,20
0.20'
O.?0
0.20
0.30
0,23
U.08
YU
o.*o
0,60
0.50
0.50
0.20
0.35
0.40
0.30
0.40
0.40
0,50
0.15
0.40
0.30
O.HO
0.30
0.50
0.39
0.12
T '
Q
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
R
0
0^
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0-
0.0
0,0-
0.0
DISCOMFORT
YL x
. 0.05 0.10
0,00
0.00
0.00
0,05
0,00
0.00
0.05
0,00
0.00
0,00
0,00
0.00
0,05
0,00
0.00
, 0.05
0.01
0.02
0.20
0,05
0.10
0.10
0.05
0.10
0.10
0.20
0,20
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0,10
• 0,11
0.05
YU
0.20
O.fefl
0.10
0.20
0.20
0,10
0.20
0.20
0.4Q
0.40
0.30
0.15
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.30
0.25
0.14
T
0
0
0 •
0
0
0
0
0
0 .
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0,0
0.0
a
0
n
0
n
0
n
0
n
n
• o
n
0
0
n
O.n
0 .0
0,n
O.o
O.n
-------
AHM
POLLUTANT CODE « i
POLLUTANT • OXIDANI
rUrvJLATlON CATE
PER CENT or POP
DOCTOR
z
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
.•12
13
U
15
16
^EOJAM
FIRST QL-43
THICC OL'A =
ARITH MFAN
STANDARD DEV
COST CODE
* '
' A-fECTED
INCAPACITY
YL X
0.60
0,40
0.20
0.45
n.60
0.30
0.40
0.25
0.30
0.60
0.55
0.40
o,4q
1.3o
o.»o
0.30
0.6Q
0.47
0.28
0.80
0.80
0.60
0.65
1.00
0.50
O.fcO
C,»5
0.60
0.60
o.eo
0.60
»
0.6C
1, = 0
0.62
0.6;
O.BO
0.74
0.26
« 12
= 10
YU
1.00
1.40
1.00
1,20
1.40
0.75
o.ao
0.75
l.CO
1.00
1 .00
0.50
o.eo
1.90
1.00
0.90
1.20
1.05
0.31
CATEGORY = CHROMIC R£SP
T
36
43
18
60
43
48
72
14
48
36
24
43
36
96
48.0
36.0
48.0
*5.l
21.4
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 .
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0. 0
0.0
DISABILITY
YL *
0,30
0.30
0..10
0.30
0.50
0.25
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.4Q
0.20
0.30
0,10
1.00
0.27
0.20
0.30
0.31
0.23
0,50
0.50
0.40
0.50
o.ao
0.45
0.40
U.40
U.40
0.60
0.50
0.40
W,40
1.20'
0.47
0,40
0,50
0,53
0.22
DIS
ROUND
YU
0,60
1..00
0.70
0.65
1.20
0,55
0.60
0.60
0,90
0,90
0.70
0.50
0.50
1.50
0.67
0.60
0.90
0.77
0.29
= 2
T
15
36
12
40
?4
48
48
10
48
36
?0
2*
?4
12
24.0
15.0
*0.0
28,4
14.1
R
0
0-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 .
0
0
0,0
o.o •
0.0
0.0
0,0
DISCOMFORT
YL x
0.20
0.20
0.10
0.20
6.30
0.15
0.00
0.10
0.10
0.30
0.05
0.10
0.10
0.20
0.13
0,10
0.20
0.15
0,09
0.30
0,30
0.30
0.30
0.50
0.25
0.20
0.15
0.30
0.*5
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.40
0.30
0.20
0,30
0.29
0.10
YU
0,40
0.70
0.50
0.40
0.75
0.35
0.40
0.20
0.55
0.70
0.45
0.33
0.30
0.60
0.4?
0.35
O.*fl
0.47
0.17
T
6
5
6
20
12
48
24
7
24
36
16
12
6
30
M.O
6.0
?*.o
18.0
13.1
a
0
n
0
n
n
n
n
n
n
• n
n
n
n
n
0.0
0.0
0,n
0, n
0,0
-------
AHK
PAf,-:
POLLUTANT COOF • 1
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE » 12
PER CENT OF POP AFFECTED • 50
POLLUTANT a OXIOANT
CATEGORY a CHRONIC RESP 015
ROUND » 2
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
.12
13
14
15
16
MEDIAN
PI=?ST GfAP
Tu;s« C'_4P
ABIT.-. Ml! iS
STAWDAfiC OEV
INCABAC
YL
0.80
0.80
0.40
O.So
0.70
0.50
0.6o
0.35
0,50
0.50
0.80
0.90
0.6Q
1.50
0.65
0.5o
0.80
0.69
0.23
ITY
X
1 .00
1.20
0.30
1.00
1.20
0.85
c.eo
0.70
O.BO
0.80
1 .10
1 ,00
>
0.90
1.70
0,93
0.50
1.10
0.98
0>26
YU
1.20
1.80
1.20
1.45
1,50
1.15
1.00
1.10
1.20
1.20
1,40
1.20
1.00
2.00.
1.20
1,15
1.45
1.31
0.29
T
36
48
24
72
48
48
72
U
48
36
24
48
36
96
48.0
36.0
48.0
46,4
21.8
P.
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.
0
0
0
0
0
0
O.Q
0.0
0,0
0,0
0 .0
DISABILITY
YL *
0.50
0.80
0.30
0.60
0.40
0.40
0.50
0.20
0.40
0.50
0.50
0.35
0.20
1.20
0.45
0.35
0.50
0.69
0«26
v>. 70
1.20
0.50
1.00
0.80
0.70
y .60
O.<»0
0.70
0.70
0.80
U.45
0.60
1.50-
0.70
0.60
0.80
0,76
0,30
YU
1.00
1.80
0.70
1.40
1.30
0.90
0.70
0.60
1.10
0.90
1.00
0.55
1.00
1.90
1.00
0.70
1.30
1.06
0.41
T
96
2*
48
10
24
48
24
1
24
24
12
72
48
24
24,0
24,0
48.0
34,2
25.8
R
0 .
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o.o
0,0.
0.0
0,0.
o.o
DISCOMFORT
YL ' x •
0.40
0.40
0.20
0.20
a. 30
0.30
0.40
0.10
0.30
0.40
0.30
0.1Q
0.20
1.00
0.30
0.20
0.40
0.33
0.22
0.50
0.60
0.40
0.40
0.50
0.45
0.50
0.15
0,50
0.50
0,50
0.25
0.4Q
1.30
0,50
0.40
0.50
0,50
0.26
."J T
••' " i 24
; . *:• <3 4
0 . C j 12
0,60 8
0,90 4
0.*;1? 48
O.tS 6
0.?', 1
C.7'. 12
C . t • 3
0 . T •. f,
C.H 2-
0 . • I 4
KM 2*
OetT 3.1
o « t-i » . o
C.M ?4.0
c . " . • :> . 2
C •• '& i 2 • 3
0
n
n
n
. n
0
0
n
0
n
• o
n
f!
n
n.
0,o
0»n
O.o
O.o
o.o
-------
CALIF ARH
POLLUTANT CODE." » 1
POLLUTANT •> OXJOANT
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE
PER CENT OF POP AFFECTED
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
•12
13
14
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST QUAR
THIRD QOAR
ARITH MEAN
STANDARD DEV
INCAPACITY
YL X
0.9o
1.00
1.60
1.20
1.00
0.90
0.9Q
0.30
1.60
1.20
1.10
0.60
0.8o
1.60
1.00
O.'O
1.20
1.05
0.38
1.00
1.40
1.80
1.60
1.40
1.50
1.00
0.60
1.60
1.50
1,40
,0.80
1.70
1.90
1.45
1.00
1.70
1.39
0.40
• 12
» 90
YU
1.30
2.00
2,00
2.80
1.80
2.10
1.10
0.90
2.00
1.80
1.60
1.00
1.60
2.20
-X'
1.80
1.30
2.00
1.73
0.52
CATEGORY a CHRONIC RESP
T
96
24
96
12
24
48
48
10
24
24
12
72
48
12
24,0
12.0
48.0
39.3
30.1
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 .
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0,
0.0
0.0
0-4)
:••*&,
0.0
DISABILITY
YL *
0.80
0.80
0.50
0.70
0.60
0.70
0.60
0.25
0.80
0.50
0.65
0.60
0.60
1.50
0.70
0.60
0.80
0.71
0.28
1.00
1.20
0.80
1.10
1.10
1.15
0.80
0.50
1.20
0.80
1.15
1.00
0.80
1.70'
1.05
0.80
1.15
1.02
0.28
CIS
ROUND •
YU
1.20
1.60
1.10
1.55
1.50
1.65
1.00
0.85
1.60
1.10
1.50
1.20
1.00
1.90
1.35
1.10
1.60
1.35
0.33
' 2
T
20
36
20
48
24
48
48
10
48
36
20
24
24
12
24.0
20.0
48.0
29.9
13.9
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 .
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
o.o.
0.0
DISCOMFORT
YL x
0.40
0,60
0.40
0.20
0.40
0.40
0.50
0.10
0.60
0,40
0.60
0,20
0.20
1.20
0.40
0,20
0.60
0,44
0.27
0*50
0.80
0,60
0.50
0.60
0.70
0.70
0.20
1.00
0.50
0.80
0.30
0.40
1.50
0.60
o.so
0.80
0.65
0,32
YU T *
0,7o 2* ft
1.20 4 "
0,80 1? i
0.80 * - 1
1.00 4 "
0.90 *3 "
0 . 9 n !-. i
0.30
1.40
0.80
1.00 c
0.40 . - i
0.^0 - n
1 . fl 0 V - 1
0,«= ^.T *.n
o . 7 o t- . • ' • •">
1 . n o ?<• • ••> • n
O."0 ' • . < -,^
0.39 l - . • >).n
-------
POLLUTANT <• OXIOANT
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE
. ;'
PER CENT OF POP AFFECTED
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
;12
13
14
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST QUAR
THIRD QUAR
ARIT^ K£AS'
STANDARD DEV
INCAPACITY
YL X
0.20
0.00
0.30
0.3Q
0.05
0.20
0.20
0. 10
0.40
0»00
0.20
0.00
0.00.
0,30
0.20
0,00
0.30
0.16
O.U
0.40
0.30
0.60
0.50
0,10
0.35
0.30
0,15
0.60
0.2o
0>40
ot.io
0.20-
0,50
0,32
0.20
0,50
0.34
0.17
• 13
a 0
YU
0.50
0.60
0.90
0.70
0.20
0.45
0.40
0.20
1.00
0.40
0.60
0,20
0,40
0.70
0.47
0.40
0.70
0.52
0.25
CATEGORY « M CHRN OBST LUNG
ROUND • 2
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0,0
0,0
0,0
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0,0
DISABILITY
YL *
0.10
0.00
0.20
0.20
0.05
0.10
0.10
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.10
0.08
0.00
0.10
0.07
0.07
0.40
.0.20
0.40
0.40
0.10
y.2o
0.20
0.10
0.20
0,20
0.30
0.10
0.10
0.20
0.20
0.10
0,30
0.22
0.11
YU
0.50
0.40
0.70
0.60
0.20
0.30
0.30
0.15
0,40
0.40
0.50
0.20
0.20
0.30
' 0.35
0.20
0.50
0.37
0.16
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0,0
0.0
DISCOMFORT
YL x
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.10
0.05
0.05
0.00
0.05
0,00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0,05
0.00
0.00
0.05
0,03
0.04
0.20
0.20
0,10
0.20
0.10
0.10
G.10
0.10
0.20
0.2Q
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.20
0.14
0,05
YU
0.30
0.4Q
0.20
0.30
O.?0
0.15
O.?0
O.ls
0.40
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.20
0.25
0.23
0.20
0.30
0.2ft
0.09
T B
0 ft
o .0
o n
n .n
o o
n n
'i n
.-. n
" n
0 0
f: 0
n
.', n
^ n
.->.- ".i
>. . •'. u . n
>> . ; 'i • i
. •' . "
O.o 0 , n
-------
CALI*
POLLUTANT CODE a i
POLLUTANT • OXIDANT
~ • - w » . i v i • v. *. i - u V" i v. u u> c • 13
' PER CENT OF POO AFFECTED o 10
INCAPACITY
DOCTOR YL X YU
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
•12
13
14
15
16
^EDlAvi
FI=ST OUAP
TMI = 3 QIJAP
ABIT* MEAN
STA\:iSC OEV
0.6o
0.40
O.*0
0.45
0.50
0.25
0.60
0.10
0.4Q
0.6o
0.60
0.55
O.So
1.30 •
0.50
0.4n
0,60
0.52
0.27
0.8o
0.60
0,80
0.80
0.90
0,40
0.8o
0.45
0,80
0.8o
0,80
0.80
0»7o
1.50 '
0,80
0.7o
0.80
0.78
0,25
1.00
1.00
1,20
1.20
1.40
0.50
1,00
0.90
1.20
1.20
1.00
1.05
0.90
1.70
1.02
ItOO
1.20
1,09
0,27
CATEG
T R
36 5
49 0
18 0
48 o
48 0
48 o
72 0
14 0
43 0
36 o
24 0
48 o
24 0
96 0
43.0 0.0
24,0 0.0
49.0 0.0
43.4 0.0
21.^ 0.0
ORY > M CHRN OSST
DISABILITY
YL X
0«4Q
0.20
0.4Q
0.20
0.40
0.15
0.40
0.10
' 0.20
0.30
0.20
0.30
0.30
0.95
0.3Q
0.20
0,40
0.32
0,21
U.50
0,40
9.60
0.45
0.80
°.25
U.60
0.35
0,60
0.60
0.45
0.50
0.40
1.20
0.50
0. %•}
0.60
U.5S
0.23
LUNG
ROUND
YU
0*60
0.80
0.80
0.90
1.20
0.35
0.80
0,60
1.00
0.90
0.75
0.70
0.60
i.45
o.eo
0,60
0.90
0.82
0.27
» 2
T
2*
20
12
36
24
48
48
10
48
36
24
24
12
72
24iO
20.0
48.0
31.3
17.7
DISCOMFORT
R YL x
0 0.20
0 0,10
0 " 0.20
0 0.10
0 . 0.30
0 0,10
0 0.20
0 0.05
0 0.15
0 0.30
0 0.20
0 " 0.20
0 0.20
0 0.30
0.0 0,20
0,0 0. 10
0.0 0.20
0,0 0.19
0,0 0.08
0«30
0.20
0.4Q
0.3o
0.50
0.20
0.40
0.15
0.4Q
0.5o
0.45
0.4Q
0,30
0.40
0.4Q
0.30
0.40
0.35
0.11
YU
0«*0 lc
0.60
0.60
0.50
0.90 i-
0.30 -"••
0.60
0,30 •-.
0,80 ?<•
o.eo i-
0,70 ! ••
0,60 :.-•
0,50 6
0.70 30
0,60 14.0
0 .50 6.0
0.70 7 4 . -,
0,55 ' S. .
0 • 1 R
w
n
0
r\
n
n
0
n
n
n
n
n
•i
n
0
O.n
O.T
J . •-.
,
-------
ARM
POLLUTANT CODE • 1
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE « 13
i"
PER CENT OF POP' AFFECTED a 50
POLLUTANT a O.XIOANT
CATEGORY o M CHRN OSST LUNO
ROUND » 2
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
B
9
10
11
;12
13
1*
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST QUA"
THIRD QUAS
as;iTH MEAN
STANDARD DEV
INCAPACITY
YL x
0.8o
0.80
0.60
0.65
0.60
0.30
0.8o
0.40
0.6Q
O.BO
0.80
0,80
0.50
1.60
0.72
0.6Q
0 .SO
0.72
0.30
1.00
1.10
1.00
1.00
1.10
0.50
1.00
0.70
1.00
1.00
1.10
1.00
A
0.80
1.80
1.00
1.00
1,10
1.01
0»2S
YU
1.20
1,80
1.40
1.35
1.50
0.70
1.20
1.15
1.40
1.40
1.40
1.20
1.10
2.00
1.38
1 .20
1,40
1.3*
0.31
T
36
46
2*
72
48
48
72
14
43
36
24
48
24
96
48.0
24.Q
48.0
45.6
22.4
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0,0
0,0
0.0
DISABILITY
YL X
Q.60
0.60
0.50
o.*o
0.45
0.25
0.6Q
o.as
0.45
O.?0
0.50
0.50
O.*0
1.20
0.50
0«*0
0.60
0.53
0.23
w.80
1.00
0.80
U.75
0.90
U.35
0.90
0.35
'U.SO
tf .SO
0.80
0.70
0.60
1.40.
0.80
0.70
0,90
y.78
0.26
YU
1.00
1.60
1.10
1.20
1.35
0.50
1.00
1.05
1.20
1 .30
l.?0
0.90
0.80
1.60
1.15
1.00
1.30
1.13
0«30
T
2*
20
18
48
24
48
48
10
48
36
20
2*
12
72
24.0
20.0
48.0
32,3
18.0
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o.o
0.0
0.0
0.0
o.o
DISCOMFORT
YL x
0.40
0.40
0.30
0.30
0.30
0.15
0.40
0.10
0.40
0.60
0.30
0.30
0.30
0.30
0,30
0.30
0.40
0.32
0.12
0.50
0.60
0.50
0.50
0.60
0.25
0.60
0.25
0.70
0.60
0.55
0.50
0,50
0.60
0,52
o.so
0.60
0.53
0.15
YU
0.60
1.00
0.70
0.80
1.00
0.35
0.80
0.70
1.00
1.10
0.85
0.70
0.70
0.90
0.80
0.70
1.00
0,8p
0-20
T
12
5
8
20
12
2«
24
7
24
18
16
12
6
30
14.0
8.0
?4 . 0
'5,6
7.9
n
n
0
n
n
n
n
n
• n
n
0
n
0
O.o
O.r,
0,0
o,n
o.o
-------
CM.!' ARM
POLLUTANT CODL « 1
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE = 13
CENT 0? P0° ifFECTcO a 90
POLLUTANT » OXIDANT
CATEGORY B M CHHN 09ST LUNG
ROUND a 2
OOCTOP-
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
'10 •
11
. 12
13
14
15
16
MEDIAN .
FIRST GL.AR
THlon 0', AP
1CTT-* u £ i N
STANDARD CEV
INCAPAC
YL
1,00
1.00
0,80
1.00
0.70
0.50
1.00
o.*o
0,30
0.8o
1.20
0.35
0,30
1.90
o.es
0.80
1.00
0.91
0.33
!TY
X
1,20
1.10
1,20
1,20
1 .20
0.80
1.20
0.73
1 .20
1,20
1 .40
1,20
'l.20
2.00
1.20
1.20
1.20
1,20
0.29
YU
1,40
1.80
1.60
1.75
1.65
1.10
1.40
1.25
1.60
1.60
1.70
1.45
1 ,60
2.20
1.60
1.^0
1 .70
1.59
0.26
T
36
43
30
72
48
48
72
14
43
36
24
48
24
96
45.0
30.0
48.0
46.0
22.0
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0,0
0.0
0.0
DISABIL
YL
0.70
0.60
0.80
0.65
0.60
0.30
0.80
0.30
0.60
0.80
0.65
0.55
0.60
1.40
0.62
0.60
0,60
0.68
0,27
ITY
X
0,90
1.00
1.00
0.95
1.00
0.50
1.00
U.55
1.00
1 .00
1.20
0.80
V.BQ
1.60
1.00
y.eo
1.00
0,95
0.26
DISCOMFORT
YU
1.10
1.60
1.20
1.35
1.45
0.70
1.20
1.25
1.40
1 .40
1.50
1.05
1.00
1.90
1 .30
1.10
1 .45
1.29
0.29
T
24
20
20
43
24
48
48
10
48
36
20
24
12
72
24.0
20.0
48,0
32.4
17.9
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0,0
0.0
0,0
0.0
YL
0,40
0,40
0.30
0.30
0.40
0.25
0.50
0.10
0,40
0.40
0.60
0.10
0.30
1,20
0.40
0.30
0,50
0,44
0.28
X
0.60
0.80
0.90
0.70
0.60
0.40
0.60
0.20
0.80
0.5Q
0.80
0.25
0.50
1.50
0.60
0,50
0,80
0.65
0.32
YU
0.89
1.20
1.00
1.10
0.90
0.55
0.7:
0.?5
1.20
1 .00
1.00
0.35
C.7r,
l.*"5
0.55
'•?!
1 • 15
:.'•>:
'J.»»
T
24
4
12
5
4
48
48
10
12 .
e
6
2*
4
24
11.0
5.0
?,.o
' i. (.
:•-. . 2
R»
n
0
n
0
n
n
n
ft
n
' n
n
n
n
n
O.n
0«n
C.o
0 .1
0.0
-------
CALIF AM
POLLUTANT COOf a- 1
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE a 1*
*'
CENT OF POP A^FECTtO c Q '
POLLUTANT a OXIDANT
CATEGORY • s CHPN OBST LUNG
ROUND • 2
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
•;i2
13
1*
15
16
MEDIiN
FI=ST QUAP
THIRD QUAR
ARITn MPAS
STANDARD CEV
INCAPACITY
YL x
0.20
0.00
0.20
0.20
0.05
0.10
0.10
0,10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0,00
0..10
0.20
0,10
0.10
0,20
0.11
0.07
0.30
0.20
0.50
0.40
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.15
o.*o
0.20
0,30
0.05
0.20
0.40
0.20
0.15
0,40
0.25
6-13
YU
O.*0
0,50
o.so
0.60
0,15
0.20
0.30
0.20
0.70
0.30
0.50
0.15
0.30
0.60
0.35
0.20
0.60
O.M
0.21
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0,0
0.0
0.0
0,0
o.o
R
6
0
0
0
. 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0,0
0,0
0.0
0,0
0,0
DISABILITY
YL X
0.10
0.00
0.10
o.io
0.05
0.05
0.00
0.10
0.00
o.io
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.10
0.05
0.00
0,10
0.05
0,05
0.30
0.10
0.30
0.20
0.10
9.10
0,10
0.15
|J,10
0.20
0.15
9.05
0.10
0.20
0.13
0.10
0.20
0.15
o.oe
YU
0-.40
0,40
0,50
0.30
0.15
0.15
0,20
0.20
0,20
0.30
0,25
0.15
0.20
0.30
0.23
0.20
0,30
0.26
0.11
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0,0
0.0
0,0
R
0
0
0
0
0 .
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0,0
0,0
0.0
0,0
o.o
DISCOMFORT
YL x
0.00 •
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.05
0,00
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
0,00
0.00
0.05
0.02
0.03
0.10
0.10
0.10
0*10
0.10
0,05
0.00
0.10
0.10
0.20
0.10
0.05
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0,09
0.04
YU
0.20
0.30
0.20
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.30
0.15
0,15
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.15
O.?0
0.19
0«06
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0,0
0.0
0.0
0,0
o.o
V
B
n
0
0
n
n
n
n
0
n
" n
0
n
n
n
0,0
O.n
O.n
O.n
O.n
-------
AHH
POLLUTANT cof.^ = 1
POPULATION CATE^Y CODE » u
%'
PE.fi CENT OF P0» AFFECTED « 0
POLLUTANT a OXIDANT
CATEGORY • s CHP.N OSST LUNG
ROUND
DOCTOR
2
3
4
-5
7
9
9
10 .
11
12
13
1*
15
16
MEOIiN
FIPST QUAP
~-l~j GuAP
A3 IT" M£ AS
STANDARD CcV
P.CAPACI
YL
0.20
0.00
0.20
0.20
0.05
0.10
0. in
0.10
0.10
0. 10
0.10
0,00
0.10
0.20
0.10
0 . 1 0
0.20
0.11
0.07
TY
X
0.30
0.20
0.50
o.^o
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.15
O.»0
0.20
0.30
0.05
0*. 20
0.40
0.20
0.15
0,40
0.25
0.13
YU
o.*o
0.50
o.so
0.60
0.15
0.20
0.30
0.20
0.70
0.30
0.50
0.15
0.30
0.60
0.35
0.20
0.60
0,*1
0.21
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
o.o
R
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISABIL
YL
0.10
0.00
0.10
o.io
0.05
0,05
0 .00
0.10
0.00
0.10
0.05
0.00
0.00
• 0.10
0.05
0.00
0.10
0.05
0.05
ITY
X
0.30
0.10
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.15
0.10
0.20
0.15
0.05
0.10
0.20
0.13
0.10
0.20
0.15
O.Q8
YU
o.*o
0.40
0.50
0«30
0.15
0.15
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.30
0.25
0.15
0.20
0.30
0.23
0.20
0.30
0.26
0.11
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0,0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0,0
R
0
0
0
0
0 '
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0,0
c.o
0.0
0.0
o.o
UISLUwr
YL
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.02
0.03
OK 1
X
0.10
0.10
0,10
0.10
0.10
0.05
0.00
0.10
0.10
0.20
0.10
0,05
0.10
0,10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.09
0.04
YU
0.20
0.30
0.20
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.10
0.15
0,20
0.30
0.15
0.15
0.20
0,20
0.20
0.15
O.?0
0.19
O.Ofe
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0,0
0.0
0.0
0-0
8 »
n
n
0
0
0
n
o
0
n
' 0
n
n
n
n
0.0
0«n
o.n
0,0
O.n
-------
AHM
POLLUTANT COOK »• 5
POPULATION CATEGORY coot = i*
PER CEM OF POP' AFFECTED » 10
POLLUTANT * OXIOANT
a S CHRN OBST LUNG
ROUND
INCAPACITY
ooc*o» YL *
2 0.'40
. 3 0.20
4 0.40
5 0.25
7 0.40
8 0,10
9 0.20
10 0.20
11 0.15
.12 0.30
1'3 0.30
14 0.30
15 0 » 4 o
16 0.40
MET, i AN o.3o
FI = ST Q'JAE 0.20
T>-1=D C'.as 0.4Q
ARTTr-: "JftS 0.29
STANDARD OEV 0.10
0'50
0.50
0.60
0.45
0.80
0.20
0.40
0.40
0.40
0.50
0.50
t0.50
0.60
0.70
0.50
o.*o
0.60
0.5C
O.I*
YU
0.60
1.00
0,80
0.70
1.20
0.30
0.60
0.75
0.75
o.eo
0.75
0.70
0.90
0.95
0.75
0.70
otso
0.76
. 0.21
T R
48 6
48 0
16 0
96 0
48 0
43 0
72 0
16 0
43 0
48 0
30 0
48 0
36 0
120 0
46.0 0.0
36.0 0.0
48.0 0.0
51.6 0.0
28,3 0,0
DISABILITY
YL *
0«30
0.20
0.20
0.10
0.30
0,05
0.00
0.15
0.15
0.30
0.10
0,20
0.20
0,25
0.20
O.iO
0.25
o.ia
0.09
0.40
0.40
U.40
0.30
0.65
0.15
y.2o
0.30
l>040
0.50
0,30
9,40
0.40
0,40
0.40
U.30
0.40
0.37
0.12
YU
0.50
0.80
0.60
0.50
1.05
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.75
0.70
0.55
0.60
0.60
0.60
0.60
0.50
0.70
0.60
0.20
T R
36 0
20 ' 0
12 0
72 0
24 0.
48 0
48 0
10 0
48 0
36 0
34 0
24 0
18 0
96 0
30.0 0.0
20. 0 0.0
48,0 0.0
36,9 0.0
24.1 0.0
DISCOMFORT
YL x
0.20
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.20
0,05
0,00
0.10
0.05
0.25
0.00
0.10
0.10
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.15
0.11
0.07
0.30
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.40
0.10
0.10
0.20
0.20
0.4Q
0,10
0,20
0.20
0,30
0.20
0.20
0.30
0.22
0.10
r
YU T «
0.4o 15 n
O.feo 5 n
0.30 6 n
0.3*. 48 0
o.ss 12 n
o . j c, 24 n
o.?s 24 n
0.3= 7 n
O.f, 24 n
o . T o is ' n
o.?', ie n
C.*: 24 ft
O.V. 6 0
O.*.1. 43 n
c . >» : i,-j O.n
C . : '. ' , •'. C . n
o . • •-. -,*.: 0 , n
c • . - \ '•>.'- O.n
r . . - -.3.9 o.n
-------
CAi.!? AiJ.«
POLLUTANT CODE ».l
POPULATION CATEGORY coot • 14
PER CtST Of PO? i^FECTED a 50
POLLUTANT • OXIOANT
CATEOCHY n s CHPN OBST LUNG
ROUND » 2
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10 '
11
12
1"3
14
15
16
'"EDI**
FIRST Quap
Th! = j O'JAP
A R ; T -i M r a >,,
STi'-:OA'-M- C£V
I^CAPAC
YL
0.50
0.4Q
O.*0
0.45
0.50
0,15
0.4Q
0.25
0.40
0.6o
0.45
0.45
0.60
0,9o
0,45
0.4Q
0.50
0,<6
0,17
ITY
X
0.60
0.80
0.80
0.65
0.90
0.25
0,60
0,50
0.8C
0.50
0.70
0,65
*
0.80
1.15
0.75
0.60
0.80
0.71
0.21
YU
0.70
1.4Q
1.20
0.95
1.40
0,35
0,80
0.90
1.20
1.20
0.95
0,90
1.00
1.50
0.98
0.90
1.20
1.03
0.31
T
48
48
24
96
49
48
72
15
43
48
30
48
36
120
4R.O
36,0
48, 0
52.1
?7.7
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0,0
0.0
0.0
0,0
DISABILITY
YL A
O.*0 0.50
O.*0
0.40
0.30
0.40
0.10
0 ,20
0. 10
0.30
0.40
0.20
0,25
0.40
0.55
0.35
0.20
0.40
0.31
0.13
0.70
0,60
0,50
0.80
0.15
V ,40
0.40
0.60
0.60
0.40
0.45
0.60
0.80
0.55
O.«0
0,70
0.55
0,19
YU
0.60
1.10
0.80
0.75
1.25
0.25
0.60
0.55
1.00
1.20
0.70
0.75
0.80
1.10
0,77
0.60
1.10
0.32
0.28
T
36
20
18
96
24
48
48
12
48
36
2*
24
18
96
30.0
20.0
48.0
39.1
26.9
R
0 .
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
o.o
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISCOMFORT
YL x
0,30 0.40
0.10
0.20
0.15
0.25
0.05
0.00
0.10
0,15
0.30
0,05
0.10
0.20
0,30
0.15
0.10
0.25
0.16
0.10
0.30
0.3Q
0.35
0.45
0.10
0.20
0.20
0.48
0.60
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.55
0.32
0.20
0.45
0.34
O.U
YU
0.50
0.80
0.40
0.50
0.70
0.15
0,40
0.45
0.80
0.90
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.80
0.50
0 .40
O.flO
0.56
0,21
T
15
5
6
48
12
24
24
8
24
IS
18
24
6
48
1 -i. 0
rt .0
?». 0
?",0
' 1.8
Bf
n
0
n
n
0
n
n
n
n
• n
n
o
n
0
0.0
O.n
O.o
C.n
C.n
-------
CAl!" AWM
POLLUTANT CODE •> \
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE a 14
PER CENT OF" PCP AFFECTED » 90
POLLUTANT « OXIOANT
CATEGOST « s CHRN OSST LUNO
ROUND
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
;12
13
14
15
16
KEOIAN
F! = ST O'jAP
T*!=D CL'40
asiTn MEAN
STiSOAPC OEV
INCAPACITY
YL x
O.SQ
0.60
0.60
0.6Q
0.60
0.25
0.60
0.20
0.7Q
0.6Q
0.55
0.7Q
0.7o
1.20
0,60
0.60
0,70
0.62
0.23
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.95
1.00
0,40
O.BO
0.60
1.00
1.00
0.80
0,90
*
1.00
1.50
1,00
O.BO
1.00
0.93
0.25
YU
1.20
1.60
1.40
1.35
1.45
0.55
1.00
1.10
1.40
1.40
1.00
1,10
1.30
1.90
1.32
1.10
1.40
1.27
0.32
T
48
48
30
96
48
48
72
15
43
48
30
48
36
120
48.0
36.0
48.0
52.5
27.3
R
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0,0
0.0
0,0
DISABILITY
YL *
0«50
0.40
0.40
0.40
0,50
0.15
0.40
0.20
0.60
0.50
0.35
0.50
0.60
0.70
0.45
0.4Q
0.50
0 ,44
0«15
0.60
0.90
0.80
0.60
0,90
0.25
O.feO
0.50
U.95
0.80
0.60
0.70
O.BO
1.00
0.75
0.60
0.90
0.71
o.?o
YU
0.70
1.40
1.20
0.85
1.30
0.35
0.80
0.90
1,35
1 .20
0,50
0,90
1-00
1.30
0C95
0-95
100
1,01
0 • 3 0
T
46
20
18
96
24
48
48
10
48
. 36
24
24
IS
96
30.0
20,0
48.0
39.9
27,1
R
0
0
0.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0,0
DISCOMFORT
YL *
0.30
0.10
0,20
0.15
0.30
0.10
0.20
0,10
0,40
0.30
0,10
0.25
0.40
0.50
0.23
0.10
0.30
0,24
0.13
0.4Q
0.40
0.40
0.45
0.50
0.20
0.40
0.20
0,70
0.60
0.30
0.45
0.60
0.65
0.42
0.40
0.60
0.45
0.15
YU
0.50
0.80
0.60
0.65
0.75
0.30
0.60
0.45
1.00
1.00
0,60
0.65
' O.So
0.85
0.65
o.to
0.80
O.^S
o.?n
T
24
5
8
48
12
24
2*
9
?4
18
18
24
6
48
'1 .0
9.0
?<» . 0
'j,<5
1 J.6
R
n
n
n
n
n
n
0
n
n
0
0
0
0
n
O.n
O.n
O.i
0.0
O.n
-------
POLLUTANT CODE « 2
POPULATION CftTiC'O'Y CODE »= I
CEKT OF POP AFFECTED B 0
POLLUTANT a NITROOEN DIOXIDE
CATEGOSY = NORMAL
ROUND a 2
DOC'OR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
•12
13
14
15
16
MEOIAN
FIRST QUA"
THIRD G'jAR
AS IT* ."FAN
STASOARC CEV
INCAPACITY
YL x
l.So
1.50
2.50
l.*0
2,00
1.70
5.00
1.70
1.00
•1.00
1.20
0,So
1.0.0
5.00
1.50
1.00
2.00
1.95
1.37
2.00
2.50
3.50
2.5o
3.00
3.00
7.50
-2.20
2,00
2.00
2.20
,1.50
3.0-0
7.00
2.50
2.00
3.00
3.14
1.82
YU
2.50
3.50
4,50
3.40
5.00
4,20
10.00
3.40
3.50
3.00
3.10
2.20
5.00
9.00
3.50
3.10
5,00
4.45
2.30
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
R
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0,0
o.o
DISABILITY
YL *
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.20
1.20
1.50
2.50
0,90
0.7Q
1.00
0.60
0.40
' 1.00
2.50
1.00
0.90
1.20
1.18
0.62
1.50
1.50
1.70
*.oo
a. oo
2.50
s.oo
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.30
1.00
2.50
-J.OO
1.60
1.50
2.50
2.00
1.01
YU
2.00
2.50
2.50
2.70
3.00
3.50
7,50
7.20
3.50
2.50
2.20
1,70
4.00
3.80
2.00
2.20
3.50
3.11
1.44
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
R
0 .
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0,0
0.0
DISCOMFORT
YL x
0.50
1.00
0.50
0.20
0.50
1.20
0.00
0.60
0.20
1.00
0.10
0,20
0.50
1.60
0.50
0.20
1,00
0.58
0.46
1.00
1.50
1.00
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
1.00
1.00
1.50
0.70
0.50
1.00
2.00
1.00
1.00
1.50
1.30
0.56
YU
1.50
2.50
1.50
l.SO
2.00
2.70
5.00
1 .80
2,00
2.50
1.70
1 .00
1.60
3.00
1.90
1 .60
2.50
2.19
0.97
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
a
0
n
n
. n
n
0
n
n
0
f»
n
n
0
n
O.n
0.0
0,0
O.n
O.n
-------
; CALIF
POLLUTANT COOE « ?
POPULATION CATEG:-BY CODE • i
PER CENT OF PC?'AFFECTED = 10
POLLUTANT • NITROGEN
CATEGORY a N03MAL
ROUND « 2
INCAPACITY
DOCTOR YL X
2 * . 1 0
.3 2.50
4 4.00
5 3,50
7 10.00
8 2.40
9 15.00
1C 2.7Q
11 2.5Q
;12 ' 4.00
1'3 3,00
14 2.20
15 3.00 _
16 6,80
MEDIAN 3,25
FIRST QUA= 2«5o
7HISO Q'JAR 4.1o
AQT7-I MEAN 4,69
STiNDi=.r- OEV 3.64
4.50
4000
6.00
4.00
16.00
4.00
17,50
4.90
4.50
6,00
4.00
2.70
*
5,00 •
8,00
4,70
4.00
6,00
6.51
4.53
YU
5.00
8,00
12.00
5,00
20.00
6.4Q
20,00
8,50
8.00
- 6,00
5.00
3.90
7.00
10.00
f. . 0 0
5.00
10,00
9.C&
5.11
T R
12 0
20 0
24 0
23 0
8 0
24 0
24 0
14 0
2* 0
24 0
10 0
12 0
12 0
13 0
19.0 0.0
12.0 0,0
24.0 0.0
i e . i o.o
6.6 0.0
DISABILITY
YL *
3.00
2,00
3,00
2.80
6.00
2.20
12-50
2.5o
2.50
3,00
1 ."50
1.30
3.00
4.40
2. SO
2,20
3,00
3.58
2,81
3.50
•?,oo
^.00
3.50
10.00
3.50
153.00
14.50
^.50
4.00
?.oo
2.00
4.00
''.CO .
3.75
3.50
5.00
5.68
4.27
YU
4.00
5.00
10.00
A. 40
18.00
5.7o
17.50
6.20
5.00
5,00
3.70
2.70
5,00
5,60
5.00
4.40
6.20
6.«
4.85
T
e
'10
16
18
5
10
18
10
8
18
8
12
6
6
10.0
8,0
16,0
10.9
4.7
DISCOMFORT
R YL X
0 ' 2.00
0 2.00
0 1.00
0 1.50
0 3.00
0 1.70
0 10.00
0 1.80
0 1.00
0 1.00
0 1.00
0 1.00
0 1.00
0 2.50
0.0 1.60
0.0 1,00
0.0 2.00
0.0 2.18
0.0 2.34
2.50
3.00
2.00
2.50
6.00
3,00
12.50
2.5Q
2.00
2,00
2.10
1.40
2.00
3,00
2.50
2.00
3.00
3.32
2.85
YU
3.00
5,00
3.00
3.50
9.00
4.20
15.00
2.90
3.50
3.00
2.90
2.10
3; 00
3.50
3.25
3.00
4.20
4,54
3.44
r J
> n
; r. 1
n
0
n
n
0
n
n
0
n
i o
n
n
*. , - •. , n
^ . •: ; . 1
\c,- 0.1
H . < o • n
3. - 0 ,n
-------
POLLUTANT CODE « 2
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE » i
i"
PER CENT Or PO? AFFECTED o 50
POLLUTANT o NITROGEN DIOXIDE
CATEGORY o NORMAL
ROUND
INCAPACITY
DOCTOR YL x
2 4,00
3 3.50
4 4.00
5 6.00
7 12.00
8 3.00
9 17.50
10 4.60
11 4,00
;12 6.00
l'3 6.00
14 2.7o
15 4.00
16 3.00
MEDIAN 4.30
FIRST GUAP 4,00
T*1BD QIJAB 6.00
APJTH MF.AS' 6.09
STANDARD OEV 4.08
6.00
10,00
8.00
9.00
18.00
5.00
20.00
6.90
8.00
8.00
8.00
3,50
>
7.00
12.00
8.00
6,9o
10,00
9.24
4,63
YU
8.00
15.00
12,00
11.00
25.00
8.00
22.50
9.90
12.00
12.00
10.00
4,50
10.00
16.00
11.50
9.9Q
15.00
12,56
5.56
T
12
20
24
32
8
24
24
20
24
24
10
12
12
18
20. A
12.0
74 .0
1 8 . '•»
7.0
R
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0,0
0.0
0.0
DISABILITY
YL *
3,00
2.00
4.00
4.00
7.00
2,70
15.00
2.10
2.50
3,50
3.00
1.80
4.00
6.00
3.25
2,5o
4.00
4.33
3.41
4.00
3.50
6.00
".00
12.00
4,50
17.50
2.90
4.00
S50
4.00
2,50
5.00
a. oo.
4 . ri 0
NOO
c.OO
6, "3
4,c>9
YU
4.50
8.00
12.00
9.00
2R.OO
7.20
20.00
4.50
8.00
5.00
4,60
3,30
6.00
10.00
7.60
4.60
10.00
9.29
6.87
T
e
10
18
20
5
10
18
17
8
18
8
12
6
12
I'l.O
6.0
18.0
12.1
5,1
R
0
C
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0,0
0.0
0.0
0,0
o.o
DISCOMFORT
YL *
2.70
2.00
3.00
2.7Q
4.00
2.30
12.50
1,90
1.50
2.00
1.80
1.30
1.50
3.30
2.15
1.80
3.00
3.04
2.83
3.00
3.50
4,00
3.5o
7.00
4,00
15.00
2,bO
3.00
3,00
3.00
1.80
3.00
3.30
3.25
3,00
4.00
4.30
3.29
YU
3.50
e.oo
5.00
4.70
12.00
6.30
17.50
4.40
4,50
4.00
4.10
2.80
•4.40
4,ffO
4.60
4.10
6.30
*.14
4.00
T B
6 ft
10 0
12 n
18 0
8 0
5 n
12 0
10 n
8 0
8 n
6 0
12 0
3 0
1C n
5 . ••} '" , 0
6.0 o . n
i ? . 0 .' . n
V.I 0.0
3 . » J . 0
-------
AMU
COOF
POLLUTANT = NITROGEN DIOXIDE
POPULATION CAT?'
PER CENT OF POP
;ORT CC:E
AFrECT£D
INCAPACITY
DOCTOR YL *
2 6.00
3 5.00
4 5.00
5 7.00
7 15.00
8 3. 4Q
9 22.50
10 6.00
11 5.00
•13 B.OO
l'3 8. 00
14 4.lo
15 6.00
16 '10.00
MEOMN .6,00
FIRST QUAS 5.00
7<-IRC Q(.-A= 8.00
A = iT-i HEAN 7,93
STANDARD OEV 5.11
8.00
15.00
10.00
10.00
?0.00
7,00
25.50
7.30
10.00
10.00
10.00
5,00
»
8.00
15.00
10,00
8.00
15.00
11 .49
5.61
» 1
a 90
YU
10.00
30,00
15.00
12.00
30.00
10.60
27.50
11,00
15.00
15.00
12.00
6.00
10.00
20.00
13.50
10.60
20.00
16.01
7,85
CATEGORY n NORMAL
T
12
20
24
36
8
24
24
3
24
24
10
12
12
IB
19.0
12.0
24.0
17.9
8.8
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0,0
0.0
0,0
0.0
0.0
DISABILITY
YL *
3.50
4.00
4.00
5,00
10.00
3.60
20.00
2.60
3.00
6.00
3.00
2,70
5.00
7.50
4.00
3oOO
6.00
5.71
4.60
b.OO
5.00
8.00
?.oo
15.00
6.00
22.50
4.60
5.00
«.oo
5.00
3.50
6.00
10.00
6.00
i'.OO
8.00
7.90
•>.ll
POUND a 2
YU
8.00
10.00
12.00
10.00
25.00
8.40
?5.00
8.10
10.00
12,00
7.00
4,90
7.00
12.50
10.00
8.00
12.00
11.42
6.14
T
8
10
18
24
5
10
18
3
8
18
8
12
6
12
10.0
8,0
18.0
11,4
6.0
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
OtO
OlSGOMFQRT
YL *
3.00
4.00
4.00
3.00
5.00
3.00
17.50
2.70
2.40
4.00
2.00
2.80
4.00
4.30
3.50
2.80
4.00
4.41.
3.86
4.00
5.00
5.00
4.00
8.00
5.00
20.00
4.60
4.00
6.00
3.00
3,bO
5.00
4.80
4.90
4.00
5.00
5.85
4.25
YU
6.00
10.00
6.00
5,00
13.00
7.00
22.50
6.60
6.00
8.00
4.00
4,10
'6.00
5.30
6,00
5,30
8.00
7.«2
4.R5
r H
ft 0
I o n
i. n
l- n
n
n
; n
• 0
n
n
r- 0
! .-. n
0
: •• - o
fi . • 0,0
t . • o . n
1 ? . • i 0 , n
H . •' 0 , n
<• . u 0 . ••>
-------
CAL!'
POLLUTANT COOt « 2
POPULATION CA*E
-------
APR
POLLUTANT coot B ?
POPULATION CAT£oo=r CODE = 2
TED a 10
£3 CEM OF POP
INCAPACITY
POLLUTANT » NITROGEN
« CHILDREN
DISABILITY
ROUND
DISCOMFORT
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
12
T3
14
15
16
MEDIAN
FJ3ST QLAR
THiSO 0(.'A?
A R I T rt "-.AN
STA'JDAS.O CEV
YL
3.00
2.50
3.00
2.60
8.00
2.20
12.50
1.70
2, So
4.00
3. 00
2.10
3.00
6.60
3.00
2.5Q
4.00
4.06
3.02
X
3«5o
4.00
5,00
3.5o
14.00
3.70
17,50
2.50
4.00
6.00
4,50
2.70
*
5, (DC
e.on
4,25
T S «
J « J y
6.00
5,97
<-.42
YU
4.00
6.00
9,00
4. tO
18,00
5.90
22.50
3.60
6.00
8.00
5.00
3.40
7,00
10,00
6,00
4,60
9,00
8.07
5.59
T
24
20
18
24
8
24
24
19
24
36
20
12
12
18
20,0
16. 0
24,0
20.2
6.9
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0,0
0.0
YL
2«00
1.50
2.50
2.20
5.00
1,80
10.00
1.40
1.50
3,00
2.20
l.*0
3,00
4,40
2,20
1.50
3.00
2.99
2.30
X
, .50
3.50
5.00
?.oo
8,00
' 3.20
I5. 00
1.90
J.oo
Soo
3.0C
2,00
Soo
is. 00
3,35
J.oo
i>.00
4.51
J,40
YU
3«00
5.00
7.50
4.00
16.00
4.40
?0.00
2.50
4.50
5.00
3.70
2.70
5.00
5.60
4.75
3.70
5.60
6. '35
5.16
T
18
10
1«
16
5
10
18
9
8
24
10
12
6
6
10,0
6.0
16.0
11.9
5,5
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o'
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
o.o-
0«0
YL
1.50
1.50
1.00
1.30
2.00
1.70
7,50
0.90
1.50
1.00
1.50
0.90
1.00
2.50
1.50
1.00
1.70
1.84 .
1,69
X
2.00
3.50
2.00
2.20
5.00
2.70
12.50
1.40
2,50
2.00
2.20
1.40
2.00
3.00
2.20
2.00
3.00
3.17
2.84
YU
2.50
5.00
3.PO
3.10
8.00
5.70
! 17.50
1.80
4.00
3.00
3.00
• 2,00
3,00
3.50
3, n5
3.00
5.10
4.'.S
4. 04
T
.10
10
4
12
8
5
12
6
a
8
8
12
3
10
8.0
6.0
10.0
•=.3
?.9
R
ft
0
0
0
ft
0
ft
ft
0
' ft
0
n
0
0
0,0
0. 0
O.o
O.o
0.0
-------
POLLUTANT COQF. » ?
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE
* '
PES CENT OF F0° AFFECTED
INCAPACITY
DOCTOR YL x
2 4.00
3 3.50
4 5.00
5 5,00
7 10.00
8 2.7Q
9 17. 50
10 3.30
'11 3.00
•12 6.00
13 3 . S 0
14 2.7o
15 4.00
16 '8.00
WF-T4-J 4.00
FI-ST QL'AP 3,30
THI=D GUAQ 6.00
t?!7" "its 5,61
STi';Oa = D OEV 4,01
5.00
6.00
7,00
8.00
16.00
4,50
22.00
4,40
6,00
8,00
4,50
,3,50
7,00
12.00
6.50
4 .50
9.03
9.14
5.21
" 2
a 50
YU
6.00
12.00
10.00
10.00
23.00
7.20
25.00
5.20
10.00
12.00
5.30
4.20
10.00
16.00
10.00
6.00
12.00
u ,14
6,34
POLLUTANT » NITROGEN DIC
CATEGORY « CHILD^N
T.
24
20
24
28
e
24
18
34
24
36
20
12
12
18
22.0
18.0
24,0
21.6
8.0
R
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0 .0
0.0
o.o
0.0
DISABILITY
YL *•
3.10
3.00
3.00
3.50
6,00
2.40
15.00
1.90
2.50
3.50
3.00
1.80
• 4.00
6.00
3.05
2.50
4.00
4.1-5
3.36
J.50
4.00
5.00
,5.00
11.00
' 4.00
18.50
2.90
3.50
f.50
3.80
2,50
5.00
8.00
4.25
J.SO
b.CO
5,80
* .27
>xinc
ROUND o
YU
4.00
8.00
8.00
8.00
19.00
6.40
22.50
3.70
5.00
5.00
4.50
3.20
6.00
10.00
6,eo
4.50
8.00
s'.o1?
5.75
2
T
18
10
15
18
5
10
18
10
8
24
10
12
6
12
11.0
10,0
18.0
12.6
5.4
R
0
0
0
o.
0
0
0
0
d
0
0
0
0
0
OeO
0.0
0.0
0.0
o.o
DISCOMFORT
YL x
2.10
3.00
2.50
2.20
3.00
2.20
12.50
1.10
1.50
2.00
2,00
1.20
1.50
3.30
2.15
1.50
3.00
2.86
2,35
2.50
4.00
3.50
3.00
5.00
3.70
16.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
2.60
1.70
3.00
3.80
3,00
2.50
3.80
4,06
3.68
YU
3.00
8.00
*,50
*tOO
10,00
5.00
I
20.00
2.90
4,00
4,00
3.30
• 2.60
4.50
4.80
4.25
3.30
5.00
5.76
4.57
T »
.10 0
10 n
10 n
14 0
8 n
5 n
12 o
7 "
? n
8 n
8 0
12 n
3 n
10 • "
9,0 0.1
8.0 0 . A
10.0 0 . r>
rt . 9 n , n
2.9 o . n
-------
CAi:r
PCuLU'iM CCDt = ?
POPULATION CATEOOSf CODE a 2
PER CfST 0" PC= 4"FECTEQ a 9Q
PAflF
POLLUTANT » NITROGEN nioxiof
CATEGORY » CHILDREN
POUND
ISCiCACTTY - DISABILITY
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
,
9
. 10
11
;12
' 13
14
15
16
MED IAN-
PI =ST 2CA3
T-I = D <:•_'<.=
A R I 7 :- '<* E - N
STi>.OiDP CEV
YL
6.00
5. CO
4.00
6.9Q
12.00
3.30
22,50
3.^0
4.' 00
3.00
3.60
4.20
6.00
10.00
5.5o
4.00
6 .CO
7.06
5.15
X
8.00
6.00
8.00
9.00
18.00
b,50
25.00
5.00
8.00
10.00
5.40
t 5.00
8.00
15.00
8.00
5.50
10,00
9,35
5.73
YU
10.00
15.00
14.00
11.00
25.00
7.70
27.50
6.00
12.00
15.00
6,00
6.50
10,00
20.00
11 .50
7.70
15.00
13,26
6.81
T
24
20
24
30
8
24
24
40
24
36
20
12
12
18
24.0
18.0
24,0
22.6
8.9
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0,0
0.0
0,0
YL
4.00
3.00
3.00
4.00
8,00
3,00
20,00
3.40
3.00
6.00
3.20
3.20
5.00
7.5Q
3.7o
3. CO
6,00
5.45
4.52
X,
5.00
= .00
6,00
,6.00
13.00
' 5.00
22,50
4.40
S50
8.00
4.30
4.00
6.00
10,00
5.50
4.50
8,00
?,41
5.02
YU
6.00
10.00
10.00
9.00
23,00
7.00
25.00
5.60
10.00
12,00
5,00
4.70
7.00
12.50
9 , S ,'
6.00
12,00
ic'-^
6,25
T
18
10
16
20
5
10
18
7
8
24
10
12
6
12
11.0
6.0
18.0
12.6
5.7
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
o.o
0,0
0,0
0.0
0.0
DISCOMFORT
YL
3.60
3.00
3.00
2.70
4.00
2.70
17.50
3.40
2.50
4.00
2.00
2.SO
4,00
4,30
3.20
2.70
4.00
4.25
3.87
X YU
4.00 4. So
5.00 10.C1
5.00 7 . c ',
3.50 4 . *; :
7.00 12,'.-.
4.50 fc.V.
I
20.00 ' 22. V.
4.40 ^.>:
3.50 -,5;\
6. DO 6.1 \
3.10 4 , • ..
3.40 A.'^t
5,00 'fc . H
4,80 5,:-,i
4,65 1-.V,
3.50 - -'..I
5,00 t i"
5.66
4,26 - .*;.
T R
.10 0
1-1 0
\? n
i-, o;
•* n
^ n
12 n
10 n
8 n
8 n
3 0
1? o
3 n
12 '0
- ) . 0 0.0
-1,0 o , n
J . 0 o.n
. -s o.n
• .3 O.n
-------
Ann
POLLUTANT coot • 2
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE » 3
PER CENT OF POP AFFECTED « 0
POLLUTANT • NITROGEN DIOXIDE
CATEGORY o OLD AGE
ROUND » 2
DOCTOR
' 2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
' 11
•12
13
1*
15
16
MED I AN
FIRS* OOAB
THIPO 01 i =
A B T T M ". £ A N
STANDARD CEv
INCAPACITY
YL x
1.50
1.50
2.00
0.9o
2.00
1.70
7.50
1 .40
1.50
1.5Q
1.40
0.70
1,00
5.00
1.50
1,*0
2.00
2.11
1.86
2.00
2.50
3,00
1.7o
3.00
2,70
10.00
2.00
2,50
2.00
2.00
1.30
2.00
•fc.OO
2.25
2,00
3.00
3,05
2.29
YU
2.50
3,50
4.00
2.70
4.00
4,00
12.50
3,10
4,00
3.00
2.70
1,90
3.00
7.00
3.30
2.70
4.00
4, 14
2.69
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0,0
0.0
0,0
0.0
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
o.o
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISABILITY
YL *
1.10
1.00
1,00
0.70
1,50
1.30
5.00
1.00
0.80
0.50
0.70
0,30.
0,50
4.00
1.00
0.70
1.30
1.39
1.37
1.50
1.50
*,50
1.30
2,50
2.20
7.50
1.50
1,50
1.50
1,50
0.70
1.00
5.00
1.50
1.50
2.50
2.26
1.83
YU
2.00
3.00
4.00
2.20
3.50
3.20
10.00
2.50
2.40
2.50
2.30
1.30
1.50
6.00
2.50
2.20
3.50
3. '31
2.25
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0,0
0.0
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0 .
o.o-
0.0
DISCOMFORT
YL x
0.50
1.00
0.50
0.20
1.20
1.20
2.50
0,70
0.40
0.50
0.40
0.20
0.50
3.00
0.50
0,40
1.20
0.91 .
0.85
1.00
1.50
1.50
0.50
1.70
1.70
5.00
1.40
1.00
1.00
0.90
0.^0
1.00
3.50
1.20
1.00
1.70
1.58
1.23
YU
1.50
3.00
3,00
0.90
. 2,30
2.70
! 7.50
2.20
2.00
2.50
1.70
1.00
1,50
4.00
2.35
1.50
3.00
2.59
1.65
. o
0
,1
0
•
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0,0
o.o
o.o
0.0
0
0
n
o
0
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
O.n
O.n
i1 . n
'. • "
U. n
-------
POLLUTANT CODE « ?.
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE
PER CF>T OF POP AFFECTED
INCAPACI
DOCTOR YL
2 3.10
3 3.00 .
4 3.00
5 2.00
7 8.00
8 2.20
9 10.00
• 10 2,10
11 2,00
12 3.00
13 3.00
14 U7Q
15 2.00
16 8«00
MFTTAN 3,00
' t W i *
FIPST CUAB 2.00
T K I P D 'J ', A 3 3.10
ARlTuHEAN 3.79
STANDARD OEV 2.72
TY
X
3.5Q
4.00
5.00
3.00
14.00
3.7Q
12,50
3.10
3.50
4.00
3.50
, 2,40
4.00
10.00
3.85
3.50
5.00
5.44
3.78
e 3
» 10
YU
4.00
10.00
7.00
4.10
20.00
5.90
15.00
4.60
5,00
5,00
4.00
3.10
6.00
12.00
5.45
4.10
10,00
7.55
4.96
POLLUTANT » NiiRoat-N niuM»t
CATEGORY » OLD AGE
T 9
24 6
20 0
18 0
32 0
24 0
24 0
24 0
24 0
24 0
36 0
'20 0
24 0
36 0
24 0
24.0 0,0
24.0 0.0
J4.0 0,0
25.3 0.0
5.5 0.0
DISABILITY
YL *
2«<>0
2.50
2.00
1.50
5.00
2.00
7. bo
1.90
1.30
2.00
1.70
1.00
• i.oo
6.00
2,00
1 .50
2. fcO
2.73
1.98
J«00
3.50
4,50
2.50
9.00
' 3.20
10.00
2.80
2.50
3,00
2.50
1.60
2,00
7.00
3,00
2.50
4.50
4.08
2.65
BOUND 3
YU
3.50
8.00
7.00
3.20
20.00
4.70
12.50
3.90
4.00
4.00
3. 20
2.40
3.00
fi.OO
4. CO
3.20
e.oo
'6.24
4.84
2
T R
j8 o
20 0
16 0
20 6
24 0
10 0
18 0
14 0
8 0
2* 0
10 0
24 0
2* 0
36 0
19.0 0,0
14.0 0.0
24.0 0,0
19.0 OtO
7.4 0.0
OISCPMFORT
YL x
1.60
2.50
1.00
1.10
2.00
1.70
5.00
1.50
1.00
1.50
0.70
0.40
1.00
4.50
1.50
1.00
2,00
1.82
1.35
2*00
3.50
2.00
2.00
5.00
2.70
7.50 !
2,20
2.00
2,00
1.60
1.00
1.50
5.00
2,00
2,00
3.50
2.86
1.80
YU
2.6Q
8.00
3.00
3.00
8.00
4.00
10.00
3.10
3.00
2.50
2.30
1.70
., 2.10
5.50
3.00
2.50
5.50
4.20
2,62
T a
12 0
5 n
4 n
ia o
8 0
5 n
12 0
3 n
a o '
18 n
8 0
12 n
2 n
18 n
8.0 0,0
5,0 O.n
1 £ . 0 0,1
v . •? 0 . n
b. 3 O.n
-------
CALIF A«R
PAD?
POLLUTANT «= NITROGEN DIOXIDE
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE
*'
PER CENT OF POP AFFECTED
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
;i2
13
14
15
16
M.PQI AN
FISST GUAR
THIRD QUAS
iqiT* MJAS
STi'.-DiSr CEV
INCAPACITY
YL x
4,00
3.50
4.00
4.00
10.00
2.9o
10.00
5.00
2.7Q
4.00
3.7Q
2.70
3.0.0
9.00
4,00
3.00
5.00
4,89
2.67
6.00
8.00
7.00
7.00
16,00
4,7o
15.00
4.20
4,50
6.00
4.30
3^.50
5,00
12.00
6.00
4.50
8.00
7,37
4.06
» 3
o 50
YU
B.OO
15.00
9,00
9.00
26.00
7,60
20.00
5.20
8,00
8.00
5.00
4.20
7.00
15.00
8,00
7,00
15.00
10.50
6,28
CATEGORY » OLD AGE
T
14
20
24
36
24
24
24
24
24
36
20
24
36
24
24.0
24. C
24,0
25.3
6.5
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
o.o
0.0
0.0
DISABILITY
YL *
3.60
2.50
2.00
3.50
7.00
2.60
7.50
2.60
2.50
3.00
3.10
1.70
2,00
6.00
2.80
2.50
3.60
3.54
1.89
4,00
*.oo
4.00
6.00
12.00
4.20
12.50
3.60
3.50
4.00
3.60
2.50
3,50
8,00
4.00
3.60
6.00
S.39
3.19
ROUND a
YU
4,50
10.00
7,00
C.OO
23.00
6.80
17.50
4,70
4.50
5, CO
4.20
3.20
5.00
10.00
5.90
4.50
10.00
8.10
5.66
2
T
18
20
16
24
24
10
18
15
8
24
10
24
24
36
19,0
15,0
24.0
19.4
7.5
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0,0
0.0
0.0
o.o
0.0
DISCOMFORT
YL x
2.50
2.50
2.00
2.00
3.00
2.20
5.00
2.20
2,00
2.00
2,30
1.00
1.50
5.00
2.20
2.00
2.50
2.51
1.15
3.00
4.00
3.00
2.70
5.00
3.70
10.00
3.10
3.00
3.00
3.00
1.70
2,50
6.00
3.00
3.00
4,00
3.84
2.07
YU
3,50
10,00
4.50
3.80
10.00
5,90
15.00
4.10
4.00
4. no
4,00
2.40
3.50
7.00
4.05
3.PO
7, no
5.64
3.^3
T
12
5
10
20
8
5
12
9
8
18
8
12
2
18
9.5
8.0
12,0
10.5
5.3
R '
n
n
n
n
0
0
ft
0
0
' 0
n
0
0
0
O.n
O.n
O.o
0* n
O.n
-------
CALIF
POLLUTANT CODE "2
POLLUTANT • NITROGEN
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE
t "
PER CENT OF POP' AFFECTED
INCAPACITY
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
MEDIAN
FIPST QUAR
THIRD QUAO
ARITH MEAN
STANDARD OEV
YL
6.00
5.00
4.00
5.00
12.00
3.30
17.00
2.9o
3.00
8.00
4.00
3.70
4.00
10.00
4.50
3.70
8.00
6.28
4.12
X
8.00
10.00
8,00
8,00
18.00
5.50
?0.00
4.4Q
5.00
8.00
5.00
4.5o
»
6,00
15.00
8.00
5.00
10.00
8,96
5.10
• 3
a 90
YU
10«00
20,00
12.00
10.00
26,00
7.70
22.50
5,00
10.00
12.00
6,00
5.50
8,00
20,00
10.00
7.70
20.00
12.62
7,14
CATEGORY e OLD AGE
DISABILITY
T
24
20
27
40
24
24
24
24
24
36
20
24
36
24
24.0
24.0
27,0
26.5
6.2
R
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0,0
0.0
0.0
YL
3.50
4.00
3.00
3.00
8.00
3.00
15.00
2.4Q
2.50
4.00
3.10
2.70
3.00
8.00
3.05
3.00
4,00
4.66
3.49
A
"•DO
5.00
7.00
5.00
14.00
5.00
17.50
3.70
Soo
b..oo
4.00
J.40
5.00
10.00
5.00
4,00
7,00
6.69
4.25
POUND •
YU
4.50
8.00
10.00
8.00
25.00
7.00
20.00
4,50
8.00
10,00
5,00
4.00
7.00
12.00
8.00
5.00
10.00
9.50
6.06
a
T
18
20
16
30
24
24
18
15
8
24
10
24
24
36
22.0
16.0
24.0
20.8
7.4
DISCOMFORT
R
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.4
1.6
YL
3.00
3.50
3.00
2.20
4.00
2.7Q
12.50
2.70
2.50
3.50
2.00
2.10
3.00
6.00
3.00
2.50
3.50
3.76
2.71
X
3. So
5.00
5.00
3.00
7.00
4.5Q
15.00
3.30
3.5Q
4.00
3,10
2.70
4.00
7,00
4,00
3.30
5.00
5.04
3.17
YU
4.00
8.00
8.00
4.4Q
12.00
6.30
17.50
4.40
4,70
4.50
4.00
3.40
5,00
8.00
4.85
4.40
8.00
6,73
3.90
T
12
3
12
24
8
5
12
10
8
18
a
12
2
18
11.0
8.0
12.0
11.0
5.9
_»
R
0
0
n
0
0
n
n
0
0
' 0
n
n
0
n
O.o
O.n
0.0
0. 0
0,0
-------
CAlIK AfM
POLLUTANT CODE • 2
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE » 4
r
PER CENT of POP AFFECTED a o
POLLUTANT • NITROGEN DIOXIDE
CATEGORY • HEART CONDI MILD
ROUND
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
•12
13
1*
15
16
MEDIAN
FIBS' CUAR
THISQ QUA°
ARIT* HEAN
STANDASO CSV
INCAPACITY
YL x
1.60
1.50
2.50
1,00
1.50
1.70
8.00
1.20
1,60
1.00
1.20
0.70 '
1.00
5; 00
1.50
1.00
1.70
2,11
2.00
2.00
2.50
3,50
2.20
2.50
2.70
10.00
2.00
2.50
2.00
2.00
1.20
• 2.00
fc.OO
2.35
2.00
2.70
3.03
2.29
YU
2.60
3.50
4.50
3.70
3.50
3.
-------
CALIF A«H
POLLUTANT coor • ?
POPULATION CATFQQBY CODE « *
CENT Or POP AFFECTED a 10
70
POLLUTANT » NITROGEN DIOXIDE
CATEGORY a HEART CONO» MILO
ROUND
a 2
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
1*
15
16
MEDIAN
FISST
THIRO
ARITH
CUAP
QIJAR
MEAN-
STANDARD OEV
INCAPACITY
YL x
3.00
3.00
4.00
2.70
10,00
2.20
10.00
2.30
2.00
3.00
2.?0
1.7Q
2.00
6.00
2.85
2.20
4.00
3.90
2.80
3.50
4.00
6.00
5.70
20.00
3.70
-'12.50
3.20
3.50
4.00
3.60
2.4Q
*
3.00
8.00
3.65
3.50
6.00
5.94
4. S3
YU
4.00
6.00
10.00
4.60
30.00
5.90
15.00
4.70
5,00
5,00
4.70
3.20
5,00
10.00
5.00
4.70
in, oo
8. OS
7.06
T
2*
20
22
28
24
24
24
28
24
36
20
24
12
20
24.0
20.0
24.0
?3,6
5.3
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0,0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0,0
DISABILITY
YL *
2.50
3.00
3.00
2.20
8.00
2.00
7.50
l.PO
1.50
2.00
2.10
1.00
l.bO
4.20
2.15
l.BO
3.00
3.02
2.15
3.00
*.oo
5.00
3.20
18.00
3.30
10.00
<2.40
2.50
-?.oo
3.00
1,60
2.50
S<»o •
3.10
2.50
4.90
4.74
4.32
YU
3.50
6.00
8.00
4.50
?5.00
4.70
12.50
3.30
4.00
4.00
3.70
2.30
3.50
6.00
4.25
3.50
6.00
6.50
5.91
T
18
20
12
18
24
2\
\
IS
23
12
36
15
24
12
48
14.0
15.0
24,0
21,7
9.9
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0,0
0.0
0.0
DISCOMFORT
YL x
1.60
2.00
1.00
0.90
3.00
1.70
5.00
1.30
1.00
1.00
1.10
0,30
1,00
1,80
1,20
1.00
1.80
1.61
1.17
2,00
3.00
2.00
2.10
5.00
2.70
7. So
1.80
2.00
2.00
1.80
1.00
1.50
2.50
2.00
1.80
2,70
2.64
1.68
YU
2.40
5. no
3,00
3.Sn
10.no
3.9n
10,00
2.70
3,40
3.00
2.70
1,70
2.10
3.50
3.20
2,70
3.90
4.06
2.64
T
12
5
S
16
6
5
12
7
8
18
10
12
2
18
9.0
6,0
12.0
9.9
5.0
R
,1
n
n
n
n
0
0
0
n
' 0
n
0
0
n
0,0
O.n
0.0
O.ft
O.n
-------
CALIF Afifl
POLLUTANT CODE • 2
71
POLLUTANT ° NITROGEN DIOXIDE
COPULATION CATEGORY CODE = 4
PER CENT OF POP'AFFECTED > 50
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
a
9
10
11
•12
13
14
15
16
MEDIAN
^IPST GUAP
THIRD QUAC
4S!T* -"EAS
5Ti\04RD 0£V
INCAPACITY
YL x
3.50
4.00
4.00
5.00
13.00
2.90
12.00
3.10
3.00
4.00
3.30
2*70
3.5o
8.00
3.75
3,10
5.00
5,14
3.39
4.50
8.00
8.00
8.00
22.00
4.70
15,00
4,00
4.50
6,00
4.20
3.50
'5.00
10.00
5,50
4,50
8.00
7.67
5.16
YU
5.00
12.00
11.00
10.00
35.00
7.60
17.50
5,00
8.00
8,00
5.00
4.30
6.50
12.00
8.00
5,00
12.00
10,49
7.9*
T
24
20
22
32
24
24
24
30
24
36
20
24
12
20
24.0
20.0
24.0
24,0
5.8
CATEGORY » HEART COND«
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0,0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISABILITY
YL *
3.60
4.00
4.00
3.50
10.00
2.70
10.00
2.70
2*30
3.00
2.70
1.90
2.00
5.00
3.25
2.7Q
4,00
4.10
2.64
4.00
8.00
?.oo
5.00
20.00
4.30
12.50
•?.60
J.50
4,00
3.50
2.60
3.50
&.oq
4.15
J.5C
6.00
6.18
4.72
MILD
ROUND
YU
4.50
12.00
10.00
8.00
30.00
7.00
15.00
4.50
4.60
5.00
4.50
3.30
5.00
7.00
6.00
4.50
10.00
8.60
7.01
• 2
T
18
20
14
20
24
24
18
24
12
36
15
24
12
48
20.0
15.0
24.0
22.1
9.8
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0,0
0.0
0.0
0.0
o.o
DISCOMFORT
YL x
2.60
3.50
3.00
2.50
3.00
2.20
7.50
1.20
2.10
2.00
1.20
1.20
1.00
3.50
2.35
1.20
3.00
2.61
1.64
3.00
5.00
4.00
3.20
6.00
3.70
10.00
1.90
3.00
3,00
2.20
1.70
2.00
4.00
3.10
2.20
4.00
3,76
2*16
YU
3.50
8.00
5.00
4,40
11.00
5.90
12.50
2,90
4.20
5,00
3.10
2.40
3.00
4.80
4.60
3.10
5.90
5.4)
3.0*
T e
12 n
5 n
S n
18 . o
6 n
5 n
12 n
7 0
? n
I* n
10 0
1? i
? n
1 = n
5 . . • . 0
t . .; - . .-»
}<:.:• • . i
• . . ' . n
- . ,• 0 . o
-------
CAL!,r
POLLUTANT CODE " 2
POPULATION CATEGORY coot » *
»'
PER CENT OF POP'AFFECTED a 90
POLLUTANT • NITROGEN nioxioc
CATEGORY a HEART COND.
ROUND » 2
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
MEOIAN
FIRST GUAP
THIPO oti=
A R I T •-( H E A \
STANOAPC OEV
INCAPACITY
YL x
6.00
5.00
5,00
6.00
15.00
3.30
17.50
3.10
3.50
.8.00
4.60
3.7o
4.00
10.00
5.00
3.70
8.00
fc.76
4.47
8.00
10.00
10,00
9.00
25.00
5,50
20,00
.4.90
5.00
8,00
6.00
4.50
£
6.0-0
12.00
8,00
5.50
10.00
9,56
6.01
YU
10.00
20.00
14,00
11.00
40.00
7.70
22.50
6.10
10.00
12.00
8.00
6,00
8.00
14.00
10,50
S.OO
14.00
13.52
9.C5
T
24
20
24
36
24
24
24
30
24
36
20
24
12
20
24.0
20.0
. ?4.0
24.4
6.3
R
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0,0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISABILITY
YL *
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
12-00
3,00
15.00
2.60
3.00
4.00
4.00
2.80
3,50
6.00
4.00
3.00
4.00
5.14
3.69
*.oo
10.00
8.00
6.00
22.00
5.00
1?.50
3.50
4.00
$.00
s.oo
3.50
5.00
8.00
6.00
5.00
8.00
7,82
5.44
YU
8.00
20.00
12.00
9.00
35.00
7.00
20.00
4.40
8.00
10.00
6.00
4,20
6.50
10,00
fl.50
6.50
12.00
11.4*
8.37
T
18
20
16
2*
24
24
18
24
12
36
15
24
12
48
22.0
16,0
24,0
22.5
9.6
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
p
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0,0
0,6
DI5COMF
YL
3,60
3.50
4.00
2.30
4.00
2.70
12,50
2.60
2.00
3.00
2.80
2.20
3.00
4.50
3.00
2,60
4.00
3.76
2.62
0«T
X
4.00
5.00
5.00
3.5Q
7.00
4.50
15.00
3.10
3.50
4.00
3.70
2,70
4.00
5.00
4.00
3.50
5.UO
5,00
3.07
YU
4.50
10.00
6,0-0
4,4r,
12.10
6,30
17.50
4.00
5.00
5.00
4.50
3.50
'5.00
5.50
5.00
4,50
6.30
6.66
3.91
T B
13 0
c n
i o n
C -, 0
6 n
c. n
: ' n
1 n
- 0
! • n
1- n
1 - n
•• n
\ - o
10.0 O.n
5.0 o.n
12.0 c- , n
9. =5 0,1
5,9 O.n
-------
CAII? AHf«
POLLUTANT CODE «> 2
POLLUTANT B NITROOEN DIOXIDE
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE
f '
PER CEN'T OF POP EFFECTED
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
e
9
10
11
;i2
13
14
15
16
MEDIAN
FI&ST QIJAB
THIRD QUA*
iPITH VEAS
STANDARD CSV
INCAPACITY
YL x
1,00
1.50
2.00
0.40
1.50
1.50
2.50
0.60
2.00
0.50
1.20
0.5o
0.50
4.00
1.35
0.50
2.00
1.41
1.00
1.50
2.50
3.00
1,20
2.20
2.50
5.00
1.60
3.50
1.50
1.60
1,00
*
1.00
5.00
1.90
1.50
3.00
2.36
1.3*
• 5
a 0
YU
2.00
4.00
4.00
2.20
3.00
3. TO
7.50
2.70
5.00
2.50
2.20
1.50
•1.50
6.00
2.85
2.20
4.00
3,41
1.76
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
CATEGO
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
'RY n HEAR
T CONO« S
DISABILITY
YL X
0.50
1.50
1.00
0.20
1.50
1.30
0.60
O.*0
1.00
0.50
0.50
0,20
0.60
1.50
0.60
0.50
1,30
0,81
0.43
1.00
2.50
^.00
0.70
*.20
2.20
2.50
0.70
2.00
1.00
1.10
0.50
1.00
2,50
1.55
1 .00
i.20
1.56
0.77
IEV
POUND »
YU
1.50
4.00
3.00
1.50
3.00
2.80
5.00
1 .60
3.00
1.50
1.50
0.80
2.00
:..50
2.40
1.50
3.00
2.48
1.19
2
T
0
• o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o-.o
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
R
0 .
0
0 "
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0 .
DISCOMFORT
YL x
0.20
1.50
0.60
0.20
0.70
1.10
0.60
0,20
0.20
0,20
0.20 .
0.10
0.20
1.50
0.20
0.20
0.70
0.54
0.50
0.50
2.50
1.50
0.40
1.20
1.60
1.00
0.50 .
1.00
0.50
0.50
0.20
0.50
2.00
0.75
0.50
1.50
0.99
0.69
YU
1.10
*,00
3.00
1.10
1.4Q
2.30
2.50
1.00
2.00
1.50
1.20
0.70
1.00
2.50
1.45
1.10
2.5"
i.ei
0.95
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0,0
0.0
' » '1
•:. . :
•': . •";
Q
n
n
n
0
0
0
n
n
0
n
0
0
n
a
0.0
0 .n
.;. . n
• , o
•. . o
-------
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
.'12
13
14
15
16
OUA
POLLUTANT CODE . ?
CAT^RY tooe a g
CENT or POP'VFECTED . ]0
YU
3.So
8.00
8.00
3.60
20,00
403
2.50
3.00
3.00
1.6o
6. 00
2.00
7.50
2.20
2.0Q
•2.00
3.00
2.00
i.qo
5.0o
2.35
2.0Q
3.00
3.06
1.84
X
3.00
4.50
5.00
2,50
13,00
3.4Q
10.00
3.10
3.5o
3.00
4.00
,2,5o
2.00
6.00
3,45
3.00
5.CO
4,63
3.13
4.10
5.00
4.50
4.70
3.20
3.10
7,00
T
30
20
20
48
48
44
30
30
12
72
24
36
48
6
CATEGORY 8 H^RT
DISABILITY
74
o
o
*'7° 30.0 O.o
3>6° 20.0 O.o
9'°° .48.0 0.0
6'56 33.4 Ot0
4'65 1^4
3.00
2,00
0.6o
6.00
1.7o
4.50
4.00
1.50
13.00
2.80
7,50
2.20
3.00
?«00
3.10
2.00
1.65
1 .^o
3«00
2.39
1 .64
2.9Q
2.00
4.50
3.94
YU
3,oo
8.00
6.00
2.60
20,00
4.20
1 0. 00
3.30
4.50
3.00
4.00
?.6Q
3.00
5,50
T
24
20
12
48
48
24
20
28
8
• 48
?0
24
12
IB
R
0.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
DISCOMFORT
YL x
4>:o 22.0 o.O
3>0° 29=0 o.O
6-°° 2e,o o.o
5'69 ".3 o.O
4'66 13.4 o.O
1.50
3.00
1.00
0.50
2.00
1.50
2,50
0.70
1.00
1.00
1.40
0.50
1.00
1.50
1.20
1.00
1.50
1.36
0.73
2.00
4.50
2.00
1.5o
4.00
2.5o
5,00
1.70
2,00
1.50
2.20
1.00
1.5o
2.00
2.00
1.50
2.50
2.39
1.22
ru
2.50
8.00
3.00
2.4o
6.00
3,70
7.50
2.90
3.50
2.00
3.00
1.70
2.00
2.50
T
16
20
6
48
24
10
15
9
24
12
?4
12
24
n
o
n
o
n
o
o
0
0
f)
n
n
?'95
>o.o
3.6? • - .-, „
• - v • n
2'04 ,,,.3 Offl
-------
CALlP
POLLUTANT CODE » 2
POPULATION CATEGCPY CODE = 5
P&QC
POLLUTANT « NITROGEN DIOXIDE
CATEQOBY = WEART CONDI SEV
ROUND o
>* L « L.L.1^1 wr r v- ~
INCAPACI
DOCTOR YL
2 4,00
3 4,00
4 4,00
5 4,00
7 3,00
a 2.7Q
O t- • u
9 10,00
10 2.70
11 2,50
12 4,00
13 4.00
14 3.00
^ •* «/ 0 v v
15 2. OQ
16 6.00
M c PI T A *>J ^ • G 0
" t, U i '' • « v
F»ceT "M i A C ? » 7 A
i ** 3 l \* U ** * C « ' v;
TU*a .-\nitAO & • ft '"*
i n j. J 'J ** U •* ^ t» • - j
ARITM MEAN 4.35
STiS/OARr- OEV 2.23
TY
X
6.00
8.00
8,00
7,00
16.00
4,20
12,50
4,00
4.00
6.00
5.00
3,60
t
3,50
7.00
6.0C
4.00
R.OO
6.77
3«<>0
YU
8,00
12.00
10,00
5,00
25 ,00
6,\
2.00 /-'-'I
3.00 4.\-i
3,00 - "t
2,30 :• '•••
4.00 '. "'
3,63 ? •'
2.05 '"'. ">'
: H
1* "
'•T! (1
iO "
•• - n
<>* °
; • .0
i n
o
0
0
n
n
n
t n
•.n
•. .n
. .0
• i
. 0
-------
POLLUTANT CODE « 2
POLLUTANT » NITROGEN DIOXIDE
7ft
. -W;V!.AI ION cftiEGORY CODE a 5
PER CFKT OF POP' AFFECTED • 90
2
IMCAP/!
OR YL
6,00
3_,
5.00
A f rt
* 5,00
5- 5,00
7 • »
7 10.00
Q _ _
6 3.00
Q ~
9 12.00
1° 2.6o
11 ~
11 2.30
1-3
2 6.00
1^ 1 A
3 4.00
• 1 A ^
14 3.40
1C _
5 3.00
16 6.00
N 5.00
°UA" 3.00
0(-'4= 6,00
"£A\ 5<25
ARD OEV 2,77
iClTY
X
8.00
10.00
9.00
8.00
18.00
5.00
15.00
4,5o
4,00
8.00
5,00
4,5o
5.00
8.00 .
6.00
5.00
9.00
8.00
4.13
YU
10,00
20.00
12.00
10.00
30.00
7.00
17,00
7.00
8.00
10.00
6,00
6,00
7.^0
10,00
10.00
7.00
12.00
11.43
6.72
CATEGORY, o HEART COND.
T R
30 0
20 0
24 0
48 o
48 o
44 0
30 0
31 0
12 0
72 0
23 0
36 o
43 o
6 0
30,5 0,0
2*.0 0.0
ft=.0 0,0
3».l 0.0
17.0 0,0
DISABILITY
YL *
4.00
5.00
3.00
3.00
10.00
3.30
10.00
2.*0
2.20
4.00
3.30
3.5o
3.00
5.00
3.40
3.00
5.00
4.41
2.51
6.00
10.00
7.00
5.00
I8.. 00
4,50
12.50
3,50
• 3,50
6.00
4.00
3.60
b-. 00
&. CO
5.50
Soo
7.00
6,7&
».13
SEV
ROUND
YU
8*00
20.00
10.00
fi.oo
30.00
5.70
15.00
4.90
6,00
B.OO
4.70
4.20
7.00
7.00
7.50
5.7o •
10.00
9.89
7.22
» 2
T R
24 0
20 0 '
18 0
48 0
48 o
24 0
20 0
30 0
8 0
48 o
?.'•• 0
24 0
12 0
18 0
22,0 0.0
18,0 0,o
30,0 0.0
25.9 0,0
13.1 0.0
DISCOMFORT
YL x
3.50
3.50
3.00
1.60
4.00
2.40
7.50
1,70
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.40
2.00
4.00
• 2.40
2,00
3.50
2.97
1.55
4.00
10.00
4.50
2,50
7.00
4.00
10,00
2.7o
3.00
3.00
2.70
2.9Q
3.00
4.50
3.50
2.90
•4.50
4.56
2.59
YU
4.50
20.00
6.00
3.70
10.00
5.60
12.50
4.00
4.50
4.00
4,00
3.60
4,40
.5.20
4.50
4. CO
6.00
6.57
4.65
T
16
20
12
48
24
10
15
15
a
24
18
24
12
?4
1 7.0
12.0
?* . 0
19.3
9.<3
0
n
n
0
n
n
o
n
n
0
0
0
0
o
n
0,0
0. 0
0, n
0 , n
0,0
-------
CALIF ARM
POLLUTANT CODE • 2
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE = 6
PER CENT OF POP AFFECTED a 0
POLLUTANT o NITROGEN DIOXIDE
CATEGORY " HAY FEVERt SINUS
ROUND B 2
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
e
9
10
11
:i.2
13
i^
15
16
MEDIAN
FI9ST OUAP
TI^TCO QUAS
APITH MEAN
STANDARD REV
INCAPACITY
YL x
1.50
1.50
2.00
1.00
2.00
1.50
5.00
1 .20
1.50
.1.00
i.eo
0,80
1.00
5,00
1.50
1.00
2.00
1.91
1 .36
2.00
2.50
3,00
2.00
3.00
2.50
7.50
.2.70
2.50
2.00
2.50
1.30
*
2.0.0
7.00
2.50
2.00
3.00
3.0*
1 .84
YU
2.50
4.00
4.00
3,00
4.00
3.50
10.00
3.70
4.00
2,50
3.00
2.00
3.00
9,00
3.60
3.00
4,00
4.16
2.36
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
o.o
R
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0,0
0.0
0,0
0,0
0.0
DISABILITY
YL X
1.00
1.50
1.50
0«4Q
2.00
1.30
2.50
0.60
0,60
0.50
1.20
0.30
. '0.70
2.50
1.10
0 ,60
1,50
I.!'
0.74
i.50
2.50
2.50
1.20
3.00
2.00
5.00
1.70
1.50
1.00
1.70
0.90
1.50
J.OO
1.70
1.50
2.50
2.07
i.oe
YU
2.00
4.00
3.50
2.10
3.90
2,70
7.50
2.80
3.00
2.00
2.40
1.60
2.20
3. SO
2.75
2.10
3.80
3.11
1 .49
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
• 0
0
0
0
0
'o.o
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
R
0.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0,0
o.o
DISCOMFORT
YL x
0.50
1.50
0.50
0.20
.1.00
0.80
0.60
0.30
0.20
0,20
0.50
0.20
0,40
1.60
0.50
0.20
0.80
0.61
0.46
1.00
2.00
1.20
0.5o
1.70
1,50
2.50
1.30
1.00
0.60
1.10
0.4Q
1.00
2.00
1.15
1.00
1.70
1.27
0.61
YU
1.50
2.50
2,00
1.30
2.00
2,20
5.00
2.50
2.00
1.30
1.70
1.20
' 2.00
3.00
2.00
1.50
2.5H
2.16
0.97
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0,0
0.0
0.0
o.o
«
0
n
n
n
n
n
0
0
n
' n
n
n
n
n
O.o
O.n
o,n
O.o
O.n
-------
APR
PA3C
78
POLLUTANT CODE a 2
PG=UL&TION CATEGORY CODE » 6
PER CE^ OF POP AFFECTED
jo
POLLUTANT a NITROGEN DIOXIDE
CATEGORY a HAY FE^ERt SINUS
ROUND « 2
INCtPAC
DOCTOR YL
2 3.00
3 E.OO
4 4.00
5 2.80
7 7.00
8 2.20
9 10.00
10 3.10
11 ?.00
1 i ~ *
• 12 3,00
1 1 2.90
1 J ^
14 1.70
15 2.00
16 6.30
u c~ n T A V.1 2 • ** 5
^ t U I ™ ' t. t —
FIRST OUAP 2.00
THIRD QUA= 4.00
APITH CEAN 3,?5
STANDARD OEV 2.*5
ITY
X
3.5o
3.00
6.00
3.50
12.00
3.50
12.50
4.60
3.00
4.00
3.50
2,50
* 3.00
8.00
3.50
3.00
6.00
5.19
3.32
YU
4.00
4,50
3.00
4.80
20.00
4,90
15.00
5.90
4,50
5,00
4.00
3.20
4.00
10.00
4.85
4.00
8.00
6.99
4.89 .
T R
2* 6
10 0
18 0
48 0
16 0
24 0
36 0
8 0
12 0 '
36 0
20 0
2* 0
8 0
18 0
19,0 0.0
12.0 0.0
34.0 0,0
21.6 0,0
11.7 0.0
DISABILITY
Yt . *
2««>0
2.00
2.00
1.70
7.00
1.70
7.50
2.30
1.50
2.00
2.00
1.10
1.70
4.40
2.00
1 .7o
2.60
2,62
2.03
3.00
J.OO
*.oo
3.00
12.00
3.00
10.00
3.70
2.50
3,00
2.60
1.60
3.00
b.OO
3,00
3.00
4.00
4.2*
2.99
YU T R
3.50 I6 0
4.50 . 10 0
6.. 00 12 0.
3.90 2* 0
20.00 16 0
4.30 10 ft
12.50 2* 0
5.00 6 0
4.00 8 0
4.00 2* 0
3.50 15 0
2.20 12 0
4.20 8 0
5.60 6 0
4.25 12.0 0.0
3.90 8.0 0.0
5.60 16.0 0.0
5,94 13.6 0,0
4,70 6,5 0.0
DISCOMFORT
YL *
2.10
. 1.50
1.00
0.90
5.00
1.50
5.00
1.50
1.00
1.50
1.30
0.30
1.00
2.50
1.50
1.00
2.10
1,86
1,0
2.50
2.50
2,00
2.00
9.00
2.50
7.bO
2.30
2.00
2.50
1.90
1,00
2.00
3.00
2,*0
2.00
2.50
3.05
2.27
YU
3.00
3.50
3.00
3.30
16.00
3.50
10.00
3.60
3.50
3.50
3.00
1.70
3.00
3.50
3.50
3. no
3.50
4.S9
3.78
T R
8 f)
5 °
12 n
16 n
6 . n
7 n
18 n
4 n
8 o
18 ' o
10 "
12 n
2 n
10 n
9,0 0,n
6.0 O.o
12.0 O.n
9.7 0,"
5,0 0 . n
-------
POLLUTANT CODE • 2
POPULATION' CATEGORY CODE = 6
* '
PEP CENT OF POP A'rECTEO " 50
POLLUTANT « NITROGEN DIOXIDE
CATEGORY = HAY FEV£Rt SINUS
ROUND »
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
1*
15
16
"EOT4 N
FJSST QL'iC
TH;=; Q!.i =
i p T T h- M E A s
5TAN.'OA»0 OEV
INCAPACI-TY
YL x
4.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
8.00
2.70
15.00 '
3.30
2.50
6.00
3.60
2.7Q
3.00
S.OO
3.60
3.00
6.00
5.C6
3.40
6.00
4.00
7.00
6.00
13.00
4.50
17.50
4.70
4.50
8.00
4.20
3.50
*
5.00
12.00
5.50
4,50
8.00
7.28
4.15
YU
8.00
6,00
10.00
10.00
83.00
7,30
20.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
5.00
4.20
7.00
16.00
8,00
6,00
10.00
10.03
5.69
T
24
10
24
49
16
24
36
10
12
36
20
24
3
la
22.0
12.0
24.0
22.1
11.5
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0,0
0.0
o.o
DISABILITY
YL *
3.50
3,00
3.00
4.00
8.00
2.40
12.50
2.30
2,50
4.00
2.90
1.90
3.00
6.00
3.00
2.50
4.00
4.21
2.88
4.00
Soo
b.OO
&.00
13.00
• 4.00
1s. 00
3.90
4.00
<>.oo
3.50
2.60
Soo
8.00
4.00
Soo
b.OO
5.93
3,69
YU
4.50
6.00
7.00
9,00
23.00
6.40
17,50.
6.00
6.00
10.00
4.30
3.30
5,00
10.00
6,20
5,00
10.00
P. 43
5.51
T
16
10
18
24
16
10
24
8
8
24
15
12
8
12
13.5
10.0
18,0
14.6
6.0
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o •
0
0
o .
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
o.o .
0.0
DISCOMFORT
YL x
2.50
2.50
2.00
2.60
6.00
2.20
10.00
1,70
1.50
3.00
2.00
1.20
2.00
3.30
2.35
2.00
3.00
3.04
2.31
3.00
3.50
3.00
3.50
10.00
3.50
12.50
3.80
3.00
4.00
2.60
1.80
3.00
3.80
3.50
3.00
3.80
4.36
3.01
YU
3.50
5.00
4.00
4.50
20.00
4.<50
!15.QO
4,40
5,00
5,00
3.60
2,40
4.00
4.80
4.65
4,00
5:. 00
6.15
4.96
T
e
5
18
16
6
7
18
6
8
18
10
12
2
10
9.0
6,0
16.0
10.3
5.3
B
n
n
n
0
n
0
0
n
0
0
0
0
0
. 0
0,0
0,0
0,0
0,0
o.n
-------
CAI.!' APS
POLLUTANT CODE a 2
POPULATION CATEGORY" CODE • 6
PER CENT OF POO AFFECTED = 90
60
POLLUTANT • NITROGEN DIOXIDE
CATEGORY » HAY FEVER* SINUS
ROUND » 2
INCAPACITY
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
•12
13
14
15
16
MEDIAN
FI=ST cuic
THIRD CuA3
AejiT« MEAN
STANDARD CEV
YL
6.00
3.50
5.00
6.00
10.00
3.30
17.50
3.10
3.00
8.00
4.00
3.70
*.oo
10.00
4.50
3.50
8.00
6.22
4.05
X
3.00
5.00
10.00
9.00
15.00
5.50
20.00
4.40
5.00
10.00
5,00
4.50
*
6.00
15.00
7.00
5.00
in. oo
8,7*
4.85
YU
10.00
8.00
15.00
11.00
25.00
7.70
22.50
7.50
in. oo
15.00
6.00
6.00
8. CO
20.00
10.00
7.70
15.00
12,26
6,28
T
24
10
24
48
16
24
36
10
12
36
20
24
8
18
22.0
12,0
24.0
22.1
11.5
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0,0
0.0
0.0
0.0
OISAaiLITY
YL
4.00
3-50
4.00
5.00
10.00
3.00
15.00
2.50
3.00
6,00
. 3.50
2.80
' 3.00
7.50
3.75
3,00
6«00
5.20
3.52
A
6.00
5.00
7.00
7.00
15,00
' 5.00
1?.50
4.10
*.50
8.00
4.10
3.50
b.OO
10.00
5.50
S50
8.00
7.26
4.22
YU
8.
P.
10.
10.
25.
8,
20.
6.
8.
12,
5.
*.
7.
12.
fi,
7,
12.
10\
5.
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
20
00
50
00
00
00
2ft
,78
T
16
10
18
2*
16
10
2*
8
e
24
15
12
8
12
13.5
10.0
le.o
14.6
6.0
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0,0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISCOMFORT
YL
3,00
3.00
2.00
2.10
8.00
2.70
15.00
1.90
2.50
4.00
2.50
2.20
3.00
4.30
2.85
2.20
4.00
4,01 .
3.53
X
4.00
4,00
4.00
3.00
12.00
4.50
17.50
3.50
4.00
6.00
3.10
2.80
4.00
4.80
4.00
3.50
4.80
5.51
4.14
YU
5,00
5.00
6.00
3.90
22.00
7.20
i
20.00
4.70
6. on
10.00
4.00
3.50
"5.00
5.30
5.55
4.7,-
7,?0
7.69
5,8fi
T
. 8
5
18
16
6
7
18
6
a
18
10
12
2
12
9,0
6.0
16.0
10.*
5.3
R
0
n
n
0
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
O.n
o,n
0,0
O.n
0,n
-------
CALI'
°OLUUTANT CODE • 2
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE « 7
PER CENT OF POP AFFECTED » 0
PAOf
81
POLLUTANT • NITROGEN DIOXIDE
CATEGORY a INFLUENZA
ROUND
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
M f 3 J ft >g
FISST OUA=
THIRD o i: A =
A 3 IT"1 M £ A S
STAND AT CSV
INCAPACITY
YL x
1.60
1.00
2.00
1.60
1,20
1,50
3.00
1.10
1.00
1.00
2.00
0.30
1.00
3.50
1,35
1.00
2.00
1.59
0.3Q
2.00
2.00
3.00
2.50
1.70
2.50
4.00
2.40
2.50
2,00
2. 50'
1.40
2.00
4.50
2.45
2.00
2.50
2,50
0.85
YU
2.50
4.00
4.00
3.40
2.50
3.50
5.00
3.70
4.50
2.50
3.00
1.80
3.00 .
= .00
3.45
2.50
4.00
3.46
0.98
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISABILITY
YL *
1.00
1.00
1.50
1.30
1.00
1 .20
2.50
0.70
0.50
1.00
1.50
0,40
0.60
1.00
1,00
o.?o
1 ,30
1.09
0.53
1,50
2.00
2.50
2.00
1.70
' 2.00
4.00
1.80
1.50
1.50
2.00
0.90
1.00
1.50
1.75
1.50
2.00
1.85
0.75
YU
2.00
4.00
3.50
2. "50
2.20
2.70
5.00
3.60
2.90
2.50
2.50
1,40
2.00
3.00
2.80
2.20
T.50
?,87
0.93
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
R
0
0
0
0 .
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0 .
0,0 •
0,0
DISCOMFORT
YL x
0.60
1.00
0.60
0,20
1.00
0.80
2.00
0.30
0.20
0.50
0,70
0.20
0.50
1.00
0.60
0.30
1.00
0.69
0.48
1.00
1.50
2.10
1.00
1.30
1.50
3.00
1.60
1,00
1.00
1.50
0.50
1.00
1.30
1,30
1.00
1.50
1,38
0«60
YU
1.50
3.00
3.50
1.80
1.70
2.20
4.00
1.90
2,00
2.00
2.20
0.90
2'. 00
2.80
2. on
1.80
2.80
2.?S
0.«2
T
. 0
''.
<•
0
n
•.!
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o..:
0.0
0.0
0. '>
.'i ( A
n
n
n
o
n
n
n
n
0
0
0
n
0
0
• n
-,.«
') .0
:•.-
',.*
^ , "t
-------
' DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
.11
12
13.
14
15
16
POLLUTANT coof . ?
>CPULATION C4TE60(,Y cooc m ^
P£P CENT °-r p°* WTED , ]o .
POLLUTANT . NITROGEN
CATEGORY . INFLUENZA
OIOXIDE
YL
3.1o
1.5o
3.00
3.20
6. 00
2.20
5. CO
1 .20
2.00
3.00
2.20
2.20
1 .5o
5, 00
2.60
2.00
3. 20
2,94
1 .46
"x
3.5Q
3.00
5.00
3.70
• 10.00
3, So
7'.5o
2.60
3,50
*.oo
3.00 .
2.7o
£
3,00
6,00
3.5o
3,00
5.00
4.36
2,13
YU To DISA
R yi_
*'00' 36 0 2.60
5'°° 3* 0 ,.50
8'00 16 o 2>5o
4'9° 6° 0 2.50
15'°° 24 o 4§00.
4'7° *9 0 ,.70
i0t0° ^ 0 2.5o
*-5° 20 0 1.30
6'°° 12 0 ,.5o
5i°° 36' 0 2.00
3'9° 2°. 0 . 3.00
3<3° 2* 0 U4o
4. 50 4 n
0 i.oo
7'°° ^ o 2.50
4'90 27-' o.o 2.00
4>5° 20^ 0,0 ,.5o
7>°° 36.0 O.o a.50
6'12 3»-3 0.0 2.07
3'13 18'7 0.0 0.77
3.00
:?.00
5.00
3.30
7.00
.3,00
5.00
2.10
3,00
3.00
2.50
1.90
^.CO
3.70
3,00
^.50
3.70
3.39
1.41
WOUND « 2
YU
3.50
5.00
8.00
4.20
10.00
4,30
7.50
3.50
4.90
4.00
3.50
2.50
3.00
4.50
T
24
10
10
32
24
12
25
e
8
18
15
24
2
24
R
0
C
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 .
0 .
0
0
0
0
*«25 16.5 o.O
3t5° 10,0 0,0
5<0° 24.0 o.O
*'99 16.9 0.0
?«14 8.8 0.0 .
DISCOMFORT
yL * ' X
2.10
1.00
1.00
1.60
3.00
1.50
0,60
0.50
1.50
1.00
1.50
0.90
1.00
2.50
1.25
1.00
1.60
1.41
0.72
2.50
2.00
2.00
2.20
5.00
2.5Q
2.5o
1.7Q
2.50
2.00
2.00
1.4Q
2.00
3.50
2.10
2,00
2.50
2.*1
0.89
YU
3.00
5.00
3.00
3,30
7.00
3.50
'• 5.00
3.20
4.00
3.00
2.80
2.10
3.00
4.50
T
16
5
8
20
16
5
18
6
8
18
• 10
12
2
36
0
n
o
o
n
o
n
o
n
n
o
n
o
3'?5 11.0 o.o
3'00 6.0 0.0
4'5n iH.o o.n
3 • 7 * 1 ? . -5 0 . .1
1.2* *,j f,,
-------
POLLUTANT « NITROGEN DIOXIDE
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE
PER CENT OF POP AFFECTED
INCAPACI-TY
DOCTOR YL *
2 4.00
3 3.00
4 3.00
5 5.00
7 8,00
8 2.7Q
. 9 7.50
10 1.40
11 ' 3.00
•12 3.00
13 3.30
14 3.20
15 2.50
16 6'. 00
*F-!!4N 2,10
FISST G'jA.o 3.00
THIP-D Ot'AR 5.00
API T" MFAN 3 ,97
STfiNOAPO CEV 1.94
6.00
4,00
6.00
9.00
16.00
4,50
10.00
3.30
4.50
4.00
4.00
3.60
^
4.00
7.00
4 ,50
4,00
7.00
6,06
3.45
« 7
a 50
YU
8.00
6.00
9.00
10.00
22.00
7.20
12.50
4.90
8,00
5.00
4,50
4.30
5.00
8.00
7.60
5.00
9.00
fl.lT
4.63
T
36
36
24
72
24
48
30
22
12
36
20
24
24
72
?7.0
24.0
36.0
34.3
18.3
CATEGO
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
RY a INFLUENZA
DISABILITY
YL X
3.50
3.00
2.00
3.00
5.00
2.40
5.00
1.20
2.50
2.5Q
2.50
2.4Q
• 1 .50
3.60
2.50
2.4Q
3.50
2.86
1.12
*.oo
4.00
*.oo
^.00
8.00
' 4.00
7.50
2.60
4.00
3.50
3.50
2,90
3.00
4.50
4.00
J.50
4.50
4,32
1.59
ROUND ** 2
YU T
4.50
6.00
6.00
8.00
12.00
6.40
10.00
4.00
7.00
4.50
4.20
3.50
4.50
5.00
5.50
4.5Q
7,00
ft.ll
2.45
2«
10
IS
36
24
12
25
10
8
18
15
24 .
2
24
18.0
10.0
24.0
17. 9
9.0
R
0
0
0
0
0 '
0
0
0
0 '
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
o.o
0.0
o.o •
o.o
DISCOMFORT
YL x
2.50
1,50
1.60
2,40
4.00
2,10
2.50
0.70
2.00
2.00
2.00
1.70
1,50
3.00
2,00
1 .60
2.50
2.11
0.78
3.00
2.50
3.00
3.30
6.00
3.50
5.00
1.70
3.50
3.00
2.70
2,30
3.00
3.80
3,00
2.70
3.50
3,31
1.09
YU
3.50
5.00
4.50
4.40
9.00
7.60
7.50
3.10
5.00
4.00
3.70
. 2.70
4*50
5.00
4.50
3.7Q
5. CO
4.96
1.83
T
16
5
12
24
16
5
13
7
8
18
' 10
12
2
36
12.0
7.0
16.0
13.5
6.9
R
n
0
n
0
n
0
n
n
n
' n
n
n
n
. n
O.n
O.o
O.n
C.n
O.n
-------
POLLUTANT » NITROGEN DIOXIDE
POPULATION CATEGORY CCOE
PER CENT OF POP' AFFECTED
INCAPACITY
DOCTOB YL X
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
•12
•13
14
15
16
HEOI*S
FIRST QUAK
ThJcQ CL'i"
inn* MEAN
STANDARD 0£V
6.00
3.50
5.00
6.9o
10.00
3.30
12.50
2.60
*.oo
4.00
4.00
3.9Q
3.00
7.00
4.00
3.5Q
6.90
5.41
2.86
8.00
5.00
'9.00
9,00
20,00
b,50
15,00
4,40
6.00
6.00
4,50
4.60
*
5.00
8.00
6.00
5.00
9.00
7.66
4.50
B 7
• 90
YU
10.00
8,00
13,00
11 ,00
26,00
7.70
17.00
6.00
12.00
10.00
5.50
6,00
7,00
9.00
9.50
7.00
12.00
10.59
5.45
CATEGORY o INFLUENZA
T
36
36
28
72
24
48
30
22
12
36
6-0
24
24
72
33.0
24.0
48.0
37.4
18.8
R
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISABILITY
YL *
4. 00
3.50
3,00
4.00
6.00
3.00
10«00
1.50
3,00
3,00
3.50
2,90
2.00
4,50
3,25
3.00
«..oo
3,35
2.07
6.00
5.00
6.00
&.00
10.00
• 5.00
12.50
3.40
5,00
Soo
4.00
3.40
?.50
5.00
5,00
Soo
6.00
5,63
2,60
BOUND '
YU
8.00
8. 00
9.00
9.00
15.00
fl.OO
15.00
5.20
10,00
6,00
4.50
4.10
5,00
6.00
6.00
5.20
9,00
B.-06
3.47
B 2
T
24
10
22
36
24
12
25 .
10
8
18
15
2*
2
24
20.0
10.0
24.0
18.1
9.0
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0-
0.0
OlSCQMFORT
YL x
3.00
2.00
2.00
2.60
5.00
2.60
7.50
1.00
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.20
2.00
4.50
2.50
2,00
3.00
2.99
1,65
4.00
3.00
4,00
3.7Q
7.50
4.50
10.00
2.50
4.00
3. So
3.00
2,70
3.5Q
4.80
3,85
3.00
4,50
4 ,34
2.04
. J
-•• 00
5.00
fc.30-
4.70
10.00
7,10
! 12.50
3.70
8.00
4.50
3.70
. 3^30
4.90
5.80
5,00
4.50
7.10
6,01
2,61
T
I6
S
14
24
16
5
18
7
8
18
10
12
2
36
13.0
7,0
1 8.0
13,6
8.9
q
0
0
n
0
0
0
n
0
n
n
n
0
0
0
O.o
0.0
G.O
0.0
O.o
-------
69
POLLUTANT CODE a 2
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE « e
PER CENT OF POP AFFECTED a 0
POLLUTANT « NITROGEN DIOXIDE
CATEGORY » UP RESP INFECT
ROUND « 2
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
•10
. 11
12
13
1*
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRS* CUA=
THIPD QIJAP
A?:TW MEAS
STANDARD 0£V
INCAPACITY
YL . x
1.60
1.50
2.00
1.60
1.30
1.50
3.50
1.10
1 .5o
1 .00
1.50
0,8o
1.00
3.50
1.50
I. 10
1.60
1.67
0.83
2,00
2.50
. 3*00
2.50
1,70
2.50
5.00
2.00
2.50
2,00
2,00
1,20
2.00
4.50
2.25
2,00
2.50
2.53
1.04
YU
2.40
3.50
4.00
3.30
2.50
3.50
6.00
3.60
4.00
3.00
2.50
l.ao
3.00
5.00
3.40
?,50
4 ,00
3,44
1.10
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
o.o
0.0
DISABILITY
YL x
1.10
0.80
1 .00
1.20
1.00.
1.20
2.50
0.80
0.7o
0.50
1.00
0.30
0.50
1.00
1.00
0. 70
1.10
0.97
0.52
1.50
1.50
1.50
2.00
1.50
2.00
J.50
1.60
1.50
1.50
1.50
0.80
1.00
1.50
1.50
1.50
l.feO
1.64
0.62
YU
1.90
3.00
2.50
2.90
1.70
2.70
5.00
3.10
2.60
2.50
2.00
1.40
2.00
3.00
2.55
2.00
3.00
?.59
0.87
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
o.o
0.0
R
0
0
0
0.
o;
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0 .
0.0
0.0 :
0.0
DISCOMFORT
YL • ' x
0.60
o.eo
0.50
0.20
1.00
0.80
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.50
0.40
0.20
0.50
•1,00
0.50
0.4Q
0.80
0.55
0.26
1.00
1.50
1.00
1.00
1.50
1.50
2.50
1.00
1.00
1.00
1,00
0.40
1.00
1.30
1.00
1.00
1.50
1.19
0.47
YU
1.60
3.00
2.00
1 .80
1.70
2.20
! 3.00 .
2.PO
2.00
2.00
2.00
1 .00
2. 00
2. SO
2.00
l.PO
2 ,"sn
2.14
0.58
T
0
0
0
f\
0
0
0
0
0
0
• 0
0
0
c
0,0
0 . •'
t • -'
^
f- . ••}
9
0
0
0
0
n
n
0
n
n
n
n
0
n
n
0,0
0 . 0
O.n
O.o
O.o
-------
CALIF AW3
POLLUTANT CODE « ?
COPULATION CATTGO'Y CODE » 8
*"
PE« CENT OF POP AFFECTED » 10
PAflC
POLLUTANT » NITROGEN DIOXIDE
CATEGORY « UP RESP INFECT
ROUND « 2
INCAPACITY
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
12
'13
14
15
16
"ED I AN
FIRS? SUAR
THIRD QUAR
A a I T M v £ A N
STANDARD CEv
YL
3.00
3,00
3,00
3.20
6.00
2.20
5.00
1.40
2.10
2.00
2.50
2.20
1.50
•5,00
2.75
2.10
3.20
3.01
1.39
X
3.5Q
4.00
6.00
3.70
12.00
3.50
7,50
2.7o
3.5o
3.00
3.10
2.70
3.00
6,00
3.5o
3.00
6,00
4,59
2.58
YU
4,00
5.00
9.00
4,80
16.00
4.90
10.00
4.30
5.00
4,50
3,70
3.30
4.50
7.00
4.85
4.30
7.00
6.14
3.45
T
24
36
22
36
24
24
30
8
12
24
20
24
24
72
?4,0
22.0
30.0
27.1
15.0
R
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0,0
DISABILITY ' DISCOMFORT
YL
2.60
1.50
2.00
2.50
3,00
1.70
2.50
1.50
1.6Q
1.50
1.90
1 .3o
' 1.00
2.50
1,80
1 ,50
2.50
1.94
0.59
X
••00
2.50
4,50
:?.20
5.00
' 3,00
b.OO
2,*0
J.oo
2.50
2.60
1.80
2,00
?.7o
3,00
2,50
3.7Q
3,16
1.03
YU
3.50
4.00
7,00
4.20
8.00
4,30
7.50
4.20
4.40
3.50
3,50
2.50
3.50
4.5Q
4,20
3.50
4.50
4', 61
1.66
T
16
10
16
30
16
10
25
6
8
18
15
24
12
24
16.0
10,0
24.0
16.4
7.1
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0,0
0.0
0,0
0,0
YL
1.50
1.50
1.00
1.60
3.00
1.50
0.60
0.70
i.to
1.00
1.40
0.90
0.70
2,50
1.45
0.80
1,60
1.39
0.69
X
2.00
2.50
2.00
2.20
5.00
2.5Q
2.50
1.70
2.50
2.00
2.00
1.4Q
1.50
3,50
2.10
2.00
2,50
2.38
0.92
YU '
2.4o . *
4.00 T
3,00 -5
3,40
7 , 0 f> 1 r:
3,50
1
5.00 1-
2.70
3.80
3.00 l~
2.70 I ••>
. 2.10 I .'
2.20 -J
4.50 T-
3.20 >.>J
2,70 - . ~i
4 , n o i , ••>
3.52 I'.*
1.32 *.^
Q
n
0
0
n •
n
n
0
n
0
n
n
n
n
n
J.O
0 . 0
n.o
o.n
n.o
-------
POLLUTANT CODE = 2
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE » a
i"
PER CENT OF POP AFFECTED a 50
POLLUTANT • NITROGEN DIOXIDE
CATEGORY B UP RES? INFECT
ROUND a 2
INCAPACITY
DOCTOR YL X
2 4.00
3 3.00
4 3.50
5 5.00
7 8.00
6 2.7Q
. 9 7,50
10 1.9o
11 2.50
;12 2,50
13 3,50
14 3.00
15 2,50
16 '6,00
"ECIAN 3,25
FJ5ST OUAP 2.50
T i- I c • -! o u A o 5,00
A o ; T " M E A s1 • 3.96
STiNOAfip OEv 1.94
6.00
4,50
7.00
8.00
17.00
*.5o
10.00
3.4Q
4.50
3,50
4.00
3.60
*
4,00
7,00
4,50
4,00
7.00
6.21
3.68
YU
8.00
7.00
10.00
10.00
22.00
7,20
12.00
5.20
fl.OO
4.50
4.60
4,30
5 . 00
8.00
7.60
5,00
10.00
8,27
4.60
T
24
36
26
48
24
24
30
10
12
24
20
24
-2-4
72
?4.0
24.0
30.0
2*.4
15.6
R
6 .
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISABILITY
YL *
3. So
2.50
3,00
3.00
4.00
2.40
5.00
1.50
1 .60
2.00
2.90
2^20
2 . 0-0
3.60
2.7o
2,00
3.50
2.80
0.98
"•00
3.50
5.00
5.00
6.00
' 4.00
7,50
2.90
3.00
3.00
J.50
a, eo
3.00
4.50
3.75
3.00
5.00
4.12
1,37
YU
4.50
5.00
9.00
8. CO
10.00
6.00
10.00
4.80
4.40
4.00
4.00
3.40
4.00
5.00
4. 90
4.00
8.00
5'. 86
?,35
T
16
10
20
36
16
10
25
8
8
18
15
24
12
2*
16.0
10.0
24,0
17.3
8.0
R
0
0
0
q
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0,0
DISCOMFORT
YL x
2.60
2.50
2.00
2.4Q
3.00
2.20
2.50
1.50
1.60
1.50
2,40
1.60
1.00
3.00
2,30
1.60
2.50
2.13
0.61
3.00
3.50
3.50
3.20
4.00
3.50
5.00
2.60
2.50
2.50
3.00
2.20
2,00
3.80
3.10
2,50
3.50
3.16
0.80
YU
3.40
5.00
5.00
4.4Q
6.00
5.70
7.50'
4,40
3.90
3.50
3.70
2.70
3,00
5.00
4.4Q
3.50
5.00
4.51
1.31
T
8
5
12
24
16
5
18
6
8
13
10
12
8
36
11.0
8.0
18,0
13.3
8.6
fl
n
0
0
0
0
n
n
n
n
n
n
ft
n
• n
0,0
0,0
0,0
0,n
O.n
-------
CAL1?
POLLUTANT CODE « 2
POPULATION CATEG-PY CODE » s
PEP CENT OF PC-o' AFFECTED a 90 •
POLLUTANT • NITROGEN DIOMDE
CATEGORY a UP RESP INFECT
ROUND »
INCAPACITY
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
12
'V3
14
15
16
MEDIAN
FISST QL'AP
THJPO a-jftP
ARITH MFi\
STANDARD CEV
11
6.00
3.50
5.00
6,00
10.00
3.30
12.00
2.30
3.00
4.00
4,50
4.00
3.00
•7.00
4.25
3,30
6. CO
5.26
2,90
X
8.00
5.00
'9.00
9.00
20.00
5.50
15.00
4.20
5.00
6,00
5.00
4.60
*
5.00
8.00
5,75
5.0C
"< . 0 0
7.3!
4,53
YU
10,00
10.00
13.00
11.00
26,00
7.70
17.50
6,50
10 ,00
8,00
6,00
6.00
7.00
9,00
9.50
7.00
11.00
10.55
5,42
T
24
36
23
48
24
24
30
10
12
24
20
24
24
72
?4.0
24,0
30.0
28, ft
15,5
P,
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0,0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISABILITY DISCO.MF
YL
4.00
3.00
4.00
4.00
5.00
3,00
10.00
1.30
2.50
3.00
4.00
2,90
3.00
4.50
3.50
3.00
4.00
3.87
2.00
X
6.00
Soo
7,50
6.00
».oo
• 5.60
12.50
3.30
4.50
Soo
4.50
3.50
Soo
5.00
4.75
Soo
6.00
5.60
2.44
YU
8-00
8,00
11.00
9,00
12,00
B.OO
15,00
5.20
8.00
5,00
5.30
4.20
5.00
6.00
8,00
5.20
9.00
7 -.64
3,12
T
16
10
20
36
16
10
25
8
8
18
15
24
12
2*
16.0
10.0
24.0
17.3
8.0
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 .
0
0
0,0
0.0'
0.0
0.0
0.0
YL
3.00
3.00
2.50
2.70
4.00
2.70
7.50
1,00
2.50
2.50
3.20
2.10
1,50
4.50
2.70
2.50
3.20
3.05 .
1.56
PORT
X
4.00
4.00
4.00
3.70
6.00
4,50
10,00
2.60
4.00
3.5Q
4.00
2,70
3,00
4.80
4,00
3.50
4.50
4.34
1.84
YU
5.00
8.00
6.00
4.70
8. on
7.?n
! l?.so
3.70
6. on
4. "in
4,f>0
3.10
4. So
5.«o
5.4",
4.*0
7,?0
5 , * •»
2,->*
T
8
5
U
24
16
5
18
6
3
18
10
12
8
36
11.0
3,0
18,0
13.4
3,6
«
n
r»
0
n
0
0
n
0
0
' n
n
0
n
. n
O.n
0,o
O.n
o,n
O.n
-------
CALIF API
POLLUTANT CODE » 2
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE = 9
CENT Of POP AFFECTED « 0
POLLUTANT * NITROGEN DIOXIDE
CATEGORY » -ASTHMA
ROUND • 2
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
12
• -13
14
15
16
MEDICS
FI5ST CL'AO
TMIPD QUA 3
A3ITH M£i\
STANDARD CEV
INCAPACITY
YL X
1.50
0.80
2.00
1.20
1.00
1.50
4.00
1.00
1.00
1.50
1.70
0.70
1.00
. 4.00
1.35
1.00
1.70
1.64
1.07
2.00
1.20
3.00
2.00
1.50
2.50
5.00
1.70
2,00
2.50
2.60
1.30
A
2.00
5.00
2.00
1.7Q
2.60
2.45
1.19
YU
2.50
2.50
4,00
3.80
2.70
3.50
6.00
3,20
3.50
3.50
3.30
1,70
4,00
6.00
3,50
2.70
4,00
3,59
1.21
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
. 0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
o.o
R
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
o.o
o.o
DISABILITY
YL X
LOO
o.eo
1.00
O.TO
1.00
1.20
3.00
0.60
0.70
1.00
1.40
0.40
'0.50
1.50
1,00
O.TO
1 .20
1.06
0.64
I
1
£
1
1
2
4
1
1
a
2
0
1
2
1
1
2
1
0
.50
.20
.00
.50
.70
.00
.00
.50
.50
.00
.00
,60
.00
,50
.60
.50
.00
.80
.78
YU
2.00
1.50
3.00
2.90
2.00
2.70
5,00
2.70
2.60
3cOO
2 = 70
1.40
5.50
3.60
2.70
2.00
3.00
2.61
0.95
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
o.o
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISCOMFORT
YL x
0.60
0.80
0.20
0.20
1.00
0.80
1.00
0.20
0,20
1.00
0.70
0.20
0,50
1.50
0.65
0.20
1,00
0.64
0.41
1*00
1.20
0.50
0.50
1.20
1.50
1
2.50
0.90
1.00
1.50
1.30
0.4Q
1,00
2.00
1.10
0.90
1,50
1,18
0,58
YU
1.50
1.40
0.7b
l«co
1.50
2,20
5.00
2,6"
2,00
2.50
2.00
O.PO
•1.5n
2.5n
1,75
1.40
2.50
1.9*
1.0«
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
a
n
o
0
0
n
n
n
n
n
• n
n
n
n
n
0.0
o.n
O.o
O.n
O.n
-------
CALIF AR*
POLLUTftS'T CODE " ?
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE a 9
POLLUTANT
CATEGORY » ASTHMA
OIOXIOE
PER CENT OF POP AFFECTED
10
ROUND » 2
INCAPACITY
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
•
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
MEDIA"'
FIRST QUA 3
Tn!?? QUA?
ARITi VEAN
STAN'OiRO CEV
YL
3.5o
2.00
3.00
2.00
10.00
2.20
12. 5o
1.60
1.60
3.00
3.50
2.10
2.00
•5,00
2.60
2,00
3.50
3,86
3.30
X
4.00
3.00
' 5.00
5,00
15.00
3.50
15.00
3.70
3.00
4.00
4,00
2.70
*
3.50
6.00
4,00
3.50
5.00
5,53
4.11
YU
4,50
4,50
8.00
7.00
20.00
4.90
17.50
5.00
4.90
5.00
4.50
3,40
5.00
7.00
5.00
• 4.50
7.00
7.23
5.05
T
24
20
24
16
24
24
36
12
12
36
20
24
18
24
24.0
18,0
24.0
22.4
7.2
R
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISABILITY
YL
3.20
1.50
2.00
1.50
6.00
1 ,70
10,00
1.50
1.50
2.00
2.50
1.30
I .00
3.40
1.85
1.50
3.20
2.79
2.44
X
-> . 5 0
2.50
4.00
Soo
10.00
• J.oo
12,50
2.70
2.50
•3.00
J.30
1.90
2.00
4.00
3.15
2.50
4.00
4.21
•3.10
YU
3.90
4.50
7.00
6,00
14,00
4,20
15.00
3.70
4.00
4.00
3.90
2.70
3.50
6.80
4.10
3.90
6.00
5.80
3.84
T
I*
10
18
10
8
10
24
8
8
2*
15
24
12
6
11.0
8.0
18,0
13.9
6.5
R
0
0
0
d
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
OoO
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISCOMFORT
YL
2.10
1.00
0.50
0.50
3.00
1.50
7,50
1.00
1.00
1.50
1.80
0.80
1.00
2.00
1.25
1.00
2.00
1.80 .
1.78
X
2,60
2.00
1.50
1.00
5,00
2.50
10.00
2.40
2.00
2.50
2.50
1.30
1,50 .
2.50
2.45
1.50
2.50
2.81
2.28
YU
3.00
4.00
2.50
2.20
9.00
3.60
t
12.50
3.50
3.50
3.5o
3.10
l.fio
.3.00
3.50
3.50
3.00
3.60
4.19
2.9?
T
12
5
8
8
8
5
12
4
8
18
10
12
2
4
8.0
5.0
12.0
8.3
4.3
9
n
n
n
n
0
0
n
n
n
' n
n
0
0
n
O.n
0,0
0,n
O.n
O.n
-------
CALl? AKH
POLLUTANT CODE = 2
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE = 9
. f
PER CENT OF POP AFFECTED = 50
.POLLUTANT » NITROGEN DIOXIDE
CATEGORY » ASTHMA
ROUND « 2
DOCTOR
2
. 3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
.12
13
14
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST GUAR
TMJPD Q U A R
ARIT1 MEAN
STANDARD OEV
INCAPACITY
YL X
4,10
2,00
3.00
3,00
12.00
2.70
15.00
2.30
2.50
4.00
4.50
2.70
-3-.-0-0
6.00
3.00
2.7Q
4.50
4.77
3.89
4.50
3.50
6.00
6.00
18,00
4.50
17.50
4.20
4.00
6,00
5.00
t 3.50
5-= .0-0
7.00
5.00
4.20
6.00
6.76
4,77
YU
5.00
5.00
9.00
8.00
23.00
4.80
20.00
5.50
R.OO
in. oo
5.90
4,30
7 = 00
8.00
7.50
5.00
9,00
8.82
5.67
T
24
20
28
24
24
24
36
15
12
36
20
24
18
24
24.0
20.0
24.0
23.5
6.8
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISABILITY
YL X
3.60
2.00
2.50
2.00
8.00
2.30
12.50
1 .70
2.00
3.00
3.00
1.70
2.00
4.20
2.40
2.00
3.60
3.61
3.04
*.oo
3.00
5.00
5,00
12.00
4.00
15.00
3.00
3.50
4,00
4.00
2.50
3.50
5.00
4.00
3.50
5.00
5.25
3.63
YU
4.40
4.50
8.00
7.00
16.00
6.30
17.50
4.30
6.00
5.00
4,60
3.30
5.00
6.00
5.50
4.50
7.00
6.99
4.32
T
18
10
24
20
8
10
24
10
a
24
15
24
12
6
13.5
10.0
2o.O
15.2
6.9
R
0
0
0
0
0.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0,0.
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISCOMFORT
YL x
2.50
1.50
2.00
0.90
4.00
2.20
10.00
1.50
1.70
2.00
2.70
1.10
2.00
2.80
2.00
1.50
2.70
2.6*
2,26
3.00
2.50
3.00
2.20
7.00
3.50
12.50
2.50
3.00
3.00
3.30
1.70
3.00
3.50
3.00
2.5Q
3.50
3.84
2.77
YU T
3.ftf> 12
4.-.', 5
4 . -. 12
«... i 6
* . M 8
* . 11 18
*.\.\ 10
' - M 1 2
'.LI 2
•-'..( 4
*.;«i 9.0
' 11 5.0
>• •*" 12.0
'. -" 8.9
4 . 3
•
a
n
n
0
n
0
n
n
n
n
1 n
n
n
n
n
O.o
O.o
O.n
0.0
0.0
-------
CALIF AMU
91
POLLUTANT CODE » 2
POLLUTANT • NITROGEN DIOXIDE
P not it * T
\jr W u ** '
ION CATEGORY CODE • 9
P£R CENT OF POP 4FFECTED
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
1 1
'12
13
14
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST QUAR
THIRD QUAP
ARITH MEAN-
STANDARD OEV
INCAPACI
YL
4.00
2.50
4.00
4.00
15.00
3,30
17, 50
3.20
2,50
6.00
5.00
3.6o
4 ,.0 0
7.00
4.00
3.30
6.00
5.83
4.61
TY
X
6.00
4.00
8.00
7.00
20.00
5.50
20.00
4.7Q
5,00
8.00
6.00
4.50
*
6.00
8.00
6.00
5.00
8.00
8,05
5.23
« 90
YU
8.00
e.oo
14,00
9,00
25.00
7.70
22.50
6.50
10.00
14.00
7.00
6.00
8,00
9.00
8,50
7,70
14,00
11.05
5.91
CATESOi
T R
24 6
20 0
28 0
24 0
24 0
24 0
36 0
15 0
12 0
36 0
20 0
24 0
18 0
24 0
24.0 0.0
20.0 0,0
24.0 0.0
23.5 0.0
6.8 0.0
•)Y " A3THF
1A
DISABILITY
YL X
4.00
2.50
4,00
3,00
10.00
3.00
15.00
2.30
2,50
4.00
4.20
2.?0
•3,00
5.00
3.50
2.70
4,20
4.66
3.55
4.50
3.50
7.00
6.00
15.00
5.00
lT.50
3.50
4.00
o.OO
4.80
3.50
5.00
6.00
5.00
4.00
6.00
6.52
4.29
ROUND •
YU
5.00
8.00
10.00
8,00
20.00
8.00
PO.OO
4.80
8.00
8.00
5.50
4.30
7.00
7.00
8.00
5.50
8.00
8.83
4.99
2
T R
18 0
10 0
24 0
20 0
8 0
10 0
24 0
10 0
8 0
24 0
15 0
24 0
12 0
6 0
13.5 0.0
10.0 0.0
24.0 0.0
15.2 0.0
6.9 0.0
DISCOMFORT
YL X
3.00
2.00
3,00
2.00
6.00
2.70
12.50
1.80
2.00
3.00
5.30
l.^O
3.00
4.50
3.00
2.00
4.50
3.75
2.84
3. So
3.00
4.50
3.00
10.00
4,50
15,00
3.20
3,00
4.00
4.10
2.60
4,00
5.00
4.00
3.00
4,50
4.96
3.41
YU T «
4.00 12 0
4.00 5 0
6.00 12 o
4.10 12 0
14.00 8 0
7 , ? f, 5 0
12. -ii 12 0
4.«./> 6 n
i . < -, 8 n
5.1-v 18 ' n
5.11 10 "
3.M 12 0
5.1-j 2 n
5.*.fl 4 n
5«-M 9,0 0.0
«.*;d 5.0 o.o
*.m 12.0 o.o
*>«•>? 9«0 0.0
3-V3 4.3 O.n
-------
CALIF AR!1
POLLUTANT CODE a I
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE * K
CEM OF POP AFFECTED a o
POLLUTANT » NITROGEN DIOXIDE
CATEGORY a VIRAL BRONCHITIS
POUND « ^
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
1.5
16
MEDIAN
FIRST QUAP
THIPO OUAP
AR;TH MEAN
STASOAPT CEV
INCAPACITY
YL x
1.50
1.00
2.00
0.90
2.00
1.50
4.00
0.70
1.50
1.00
l.'O
0.7o
1,00
4.00
1.50
1 .00
2.00
1.68
1.07
2.00
2.00
3.00
2.00
2.70
2.50
5.00
1,60
2.50
3.00
2.50
1,40
»
2.00
5.00
2,50
2,00
3.00
2.66
1.10
YU
2.50
3.50
4.00
2.80
3.70
3.50
6.00
2.70
4.00
3.50
3.00
1.70
3.00
6.00
3.50
2.eo
4.00
3.56
1.20
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
o.o
R
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
•0,0
0,0
0.0
o.o
0.0
DISABILITY
YL *
1.00
0.80
1.00
0.80
1.50
1.20
2.50
0.30
0.60
1.00
1.40
0.40
0.50
1.30
1.00
0.60
1.30
1.02
0.56
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
2,00
2.00
J.20
1.10
1.50
*.oo
2.00
0.90
1.00
2.00
1.50
1.50
2.00
1,69
0.58
YU
2.10
3.50
2»20
?.50
2.50
2.70
5.00
2.60
2.60
3.00
2.70
1.40
1.50
2.80
2.60
2.20
2.80
2.65
0.87
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0,0
0,0
0.0
0.0
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0,0
0,0
0.0
DISCOMFORT
YL x
0.60
0.80
0.20
0.20
1.50
0.80
1.00
0,30
0.20
1.00
1,00
0,20
0.50
1.00
0.70
0.20
1.00
0,66
0.41
1.00
1.50
0.50
0.70
1.60
1.50
2.50
0.70
1.00
1.50
1.70
0.40
1.00
1,50
1.25
0.70
1.50
1.22
0.57
YU
1.50
3.50
0.70
1.70
2.00
2.20
3.00
2.00
2.00
2.50
2,30
0.90
1.50
2.40
2.00
1.50
2.40
2.01
0.75
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
o.o
a
n
0
0
0
0
0
n
0
0
' 0
0
n
ft
n
O.n
O.n
O.n
O.o
O.o
-------
CALIF AHU
POLLUTANT CODE a?
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE » 10
CENT OF POO AFFECTED a 10 •
POLLUTANT a NITROGEN DIOXIDE
CATEGORY ° VIRAL BRONCHITIS
POUND » 2
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
e
9
1C
11
:i2
13
1*
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST GUAR
THIRD oijAR
ASITH MEAN
STANDARD OEV
INCAPACITY
YL x
3,10
3,00
3,50
2.70
7.00
2.20
5,00
1,70
2.00
3.00
3.00
2.20
1,50
5.00
3.00
2.20
3.50
3,21
1.52
3.50
4.00
5.00
3.50
10.00
3.50
7.50
3.20
3.50
4.00
4.00
2.70
*
3.00
6.00
3.75
3.50
5,00
4,53
a, 03
YU
4,00
5.00
9,00
4.70
16.00
4,70
10.00
5.00
5,00
5.00
4.50
3.^0
4.50
7.00
5,00
4,50
7,00
6.27
3.37
T
36
20
24
50
24
24
32
20
12
36
20
24
24
36
24,0
20.0
36,0
27,3
9.7
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0,0
0,0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISABILITY
YL *
2.60
1.50
2,00
2.20
2.50
1.70
2.50
1.70
1.50
2.00
2.70
1.30
LOG
1.70
1.85
1.50
2.50
1.92
0.52
3.00
*.50
4,00
3.00
5.00
3.00
^.00
2.60
2.50
3.oo
3.40
1.90
2,00
H.50
3.00
2.50
3.40
3,10
0.97
YU
3.50
4.00
7.00
4,00
8.00
4,30
7.50
4.30
4.00
4.00
4.00
2,70
3.00
3.40
4.00
3.50
4.30
4.55
1.68
T
2*
10
16
16
24
10
24
8
8
2*
15
24
4
6
15.5
8.0
24.0
15.2
7,6
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0 .
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISCOMFORT
YL x
2.10
1.50
0.50
1.30
2.00
1.50
1.00
0.50
1.00
1 .00
2.20
0.80
1.00
1.50
1.15
1.00
1.50
1.28
0,55
2.50
2.50
1.50
2.20
4.00
2.50
3.00
1.30
2.00
2.00
2.80
1.30
1.50
2.00
2.10
1.50
2.50
2.22
0.75
YU
3,00
4.00
2.50
3,20
6.00
3.50
6.00
3.20
3.50
3.00
3.50
1.80
2.00
3.00
3.20
3.00
3.50
3.44
1.23
T
16
5
8
8
8
5
IS
6
a
18
10
12
4
13
8.0
6.0
16,0
10.3
5.2
«
R
0
0
0
n
n
n
n
n
n
' o
n
o
n
n
0.0
O.n
O.n
O.n
0.0
-------
CALIF AHB
PAOE
POLLUTANT CODE •- ?
POLL.UTANT • NITROGEN' DIOXIDE
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE
PER CENT OF POP AFFECTED
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10 '
11
•'12
13
I4
15
16
-MUM
FIRST OllAR
THIP3 004=
AS IT- V£AS
STANDARD DEV
INCAPACITY
YL x
3.10
3.00
3.50
2.70
7.00
2,20
5.00
1.70
2.00
3.00
3.00
2.20
1.50
5.00
3.00
2.20
3.50
3,21
1.52
3,50
4.00
5,00
3.50
10.00
3.50
7.50
3.20
3,50
4.00
4.00
2,70
3.00
6.00
3.75
3.50
5.00
4.53
2.03
e 10
• 10
YU
4.00
5.00
9,00
4.70
16.00
4,70
10.00
5.00
5,00.
5.00
4.50
3.40
4.50
7.00
5.00
4.50
7,00
6.27
3.37
CATEGORY a VIRAL BRONCHITIS
ROUND a 2
T
36
20
24
50
24
24
32
20
12
36
20
24
24
36
24.0
20.0
36,0
27.3
9.7
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0,0
0,0
0,0
0,0
DISABILITY
YL *
2,60
1,50
2,00
2,20
2«50
1,70
2.50
1.70
1.50
2.00
2.70
1.30
1.00
1.70
1.85
1.50
3. SO
1.92
0.52
3.00
*,50
4.00
3.00
5.00
3.00
3.00
2.60
2.50
3.00
3.40
1.90
2.00
2.50
3,00
2.50
3.40
3.10
0.97
YU
3,50
4.00
7.00
4,00
8.00
4,30
7.50
4.30
4.00
4.00
4,00
2.70
3.00
3.40
4.00
3,50
4.30
4.55
1.68
T
24
10
16
16
24
10
2*
8
8
24
15
24
4
6
15.5
8.0
24.0
15.2
7.6
R
0
0
0
0
0 .
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0,0 .
0.0
0.0
0,0
0,0
DISCOMFORT
YL x
2.10
1.50
0.50
1.30
2.00
1.50
1.00
0.50
1.00
1 .00
2.20
0,80
1.00
1.50
1.15
1.00
1.50
1.28
0.55
2,50
2,50
1,50
2.20
4.00
2,50
3.00
1.30
2.00
2.00
2.80
1,30
1,50
2.00
2.10
1,50
2.50
2.22
0.75
YU
3.00
4.00
2,50
3.20
6.00
3.50
6,00
3.20
3.50
3.00
3.50
1.80
2.00
3.00
3.20
3,00
3.50
3.44
1,23
T
16
5
8
8
8
5
ia
6
e
18
10
12
*
16
8,0
6.0
16.0
10,3
5.2
c
R
n
n
0
n
n
o
n
n
n
' n
n
0
n
n
0,0
O.n
0,n
O.n
O.n
-------
AKH
-OLLUT4NT CODE » ?
PC = t'LiTIO-1' CiTEGOaY COOt
p>R CSNT OF POP AFFECTED
POLLUTANT » NITROGEN DIOXIDE
CATEGORY a VIRAL BRONCHITIS
POUND
INCAPACITY
DOCTOR YL X
2 6»00
3 3.50
4 5.00
5 6.00
7 12.00
8 3.30
9 12.5Q
10' 2 . 7 0
11 * . 0 0
••12 6.00
13 4,50
14 3aftO
1 5 4,. 0 0
16 7.00
v r - : i >. 4 ,7 5
F; = ST G'.'i= 3.60
T H. I 5 - ' •, i = fc.OO
i 3 ; T -' w E - "• 5.72
STi',Ci = D OEV 3.03
8.00
5.00
9.00
9.00
15.00
b,5o
15.00
4.40
6.00
10.00
5.50
4.50
A
6.00
8.00
7 . o •:
5 • 5 •:•
9 . o •:•
7.*2
3.49
YU
10.00
10.00
14,00
11,00
25.00
7.70
17.00
6,00
in. 00
14.00
6.00
6.00
10,00
9,00
10,00
7.70
li.OO
1 1 , 1 2
5.14
T R
36 6
20 0
2* 0
' 48 0
24 0
24 0
32 0
20 0
12 0
36 0
20 0
24 0
2* 0
36 0
24,0 0.0
20,: 0,0
36." 0,0
27.4 0,0
9.3 0.0
DISABILITY
YL *
4.00
3.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
3.00
10.00
2.00
3,50
6.00
4.20
2,70
3.00
4.50
4 . 0 0
3.00
4.20
4,14.
1.94
6.00
4.00
7.00
? . 0 0
2.00
5.00
12.50
J.40
5.00
e.oo
4.70
3.50
s.oo
5.00
5.0-'
** f* r
Q.OO
5.51
2.52
YU
•6.00
6.00
10.00
9.00
1 2 . 0 0
8.00
15.00
5.20
9.00
10*00
6.00
4.30
7.00
5.50
8 . 0 0
6.05
10.00
B, 36
?.B6
T R
2* 0
10 0
2* 0
2* 0
16 0
10 0
24 0
10 0
8 0
. 2* 0
15 0
2* 0
4 0
6 0
15.5 0,0.
10 .0 0,0
2fe.C 0.0
15.? 0.0
7.8 0.0
DISCOMFORT
YL «
3.00
3.00
3.50
2,90
3.00
2.70
7.50
1.30
2.50
3.00
3.30
i.eo
2.40
4.50
3,00
2,50
3,30
3.16
1.46
4.00
4.00
4.50
3.50
6.00
4.50
10.00
2.70
4.00
4.00
4.20
2.6Q
4.00
4.80
4.0C
4,00
4.50
4.49
1.79
YU
5.00
8.00
5.50
4.7Q
10.00
7.20
12.50
4.20
6.00
5.00
4.80
3.4Q
5,50
5.50
5.50
4.80
7.20
e.?4
2.46
r
• •
i D
12
12
8
5
18
8
8
18
10
12
4
18
1 1.0
8.0
16.0
11.*
4.7
R
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
0
n
n
O.o
C.o
O.n
O.n
0 . n
-------
CALI?
POLLUTANT CODE » 2
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE = n
P£fi CfNT Of POD i'TECTtO a 0
POLLUTANT • NITROGEN OIOXJOE
CATEGORY B BACT, PNEUMONIA
ROUND
DOC'CR
a
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
. 1*
1.5
16
MEDIAN
FIPST QUA;?
THIP'J <3Ui3
A 3 T T -. V r i S
STA.VCARO 'CEV
IN'CA = A
YL
1.60
1.00
3.00
1.10
2.00
1.20
2.50
1.00
0.70
1.50
3.00
0.7Q
1.00
4.00
1.35
1.00
2 . C 0
1't~
0.96
CITY
X
2. CO
2.00
3.00
2.00
2.fc0
1.70
3.70
2.20
2.00
2.50
3,73
1 .40
* 2.00
5.00
2.10
2 . 0 0
3.0l
•z = <-
i. , - ..
0,95
YU
2.50
3.50
4.00
3.20
3.30
2.70
5.00
3.70
4.00
3.00
4,60
2,00
3.00
6,00
3.40
3.00
4,00
3,61
1,06
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
n
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0,0
0,0
0,0
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
?.n
0,0
OTSA3ILITY
YL X
1.00
0.80
1.00
0,7o
1.5Q
0.80
1.00
0.50
0.20
1.00
2.10
0,40
0.60
0.50
o.eo
0«5o
1,00
O.S6
0.^8
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
*.oo
i.50
2.00
1 .60
- 1,50
2.00
3,00
0.90
1 .00
l.?0
1.50
1.50
2.00
1,62
0.52
YU
2.00
3.50
2.20
2.50
2.60
2-20
3,00
2.90
'3.00
3,00
4.00
1.50
1 .50
?.20
2.55
2,20
3 . ? 0
2,^
0.71
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
• o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0,0
0,0
0.0
0.0
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0,0
0.0
o.'o
0.0
0,0
DISCOMFORT
YL x
0,50
0.80
0.20
0,20
1.30
0,70
0.60
0.30
0.30
1,00
1.30
0.20
0.50
0.50
0,50
0,20
o . e o
0.59
0,39
1.00
1.50
0.50
0.4Q
1.50
1.20
1.00
1.20
1.00
1.50
2.00
0,50
1.00
1.00
I. 00
1.00
1.50
1.09
0.*4
YU T
1.11 0
3. Si o
0, 7^1 0
o.->* o
\ . ' 1 o
; . n o
'' . - • 0
f . '. 1 o
; . '. 1 o
>.'.-i 0
i. 11 o
t.vi o
• ;. i 0
' . *. i 0
*•-• D.O
0.0
' ••• o.o
0.0
1 •'-.- 0.0
*«
0
0
n
0
n
0
n
n
0
n
n
0
0
n
0,0
O.n
0. 0
O.o
O.o
-------
PQlLUTiNT COOE e .2
POPULATION CAfEOO^Y CODE a \\
P£3 CENT OF POP AfTECTEC » 10
PGL'-UTANT s NITROGEN DTOXjr.E
CATEGORY s BACTa PNZUMCMft
POUND
OGCTCS
2
3
A
5
7
8
- 9
io •
11
.'12
13
14
15
16
vrotcs
FI3ST QUA =
THIRD OCAS
iP]T» V£AN
STA«;OA?D OEV
INCAPA!
YL
4.00
3.00
3.50
2.00
7.00
1.70
5.00
1.00
1,50
3,00
3,3o
1.90
1 .5c
5.00
3.00
1.7Q
4,00
3,14
1.71
:i TY
X
5.00
4,00
5.00
5.00
10.00
2.7Q
7.50
2.50
3.00
4.00
4.50
2-20
«
3,00
6.00
4.25
3.00
5.00
4.60
2.14
YU
8.00
5.00
9.00
7.00
16.00
3.70
10.00
4.30
4 .50
5.00
5.50
T.AO
4.50
7,00
5,25
4,50
8.00
6,64
3.36
T
36
20
24
72
24
24
36
12
24
36
20
36
24
36
24.0
24.0
36oO
30.3
14.3
a
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0 aO
0,0
0.0
0.0
DISABILITY
YL x
2«5o
1.50
2.00
1.50
2.50
1.40
2.50
0.80
l.bO
2.50
3.00
1.30
1.00
1.30
1.50
1.30
2.50
l.ei
0.63
••00
2.50
4.00
Soo
19.00
2.20
3.00
2.00
2.50
J.50
J.7o
1 .90
2.00
2.00
2,75
2.00
4.00
3,0<5
1.11
YU
3. So
4.00
7,00
6.00
8.00
3.20
7.50
3.70
4.00
4.50
4.60
2.70
3.00
3.00
4.00
3.20
fc.OO
4062
1.78
T
2*
10
16
46
16
10
24
6
12
24
15
24
6
6
15,5
.1 0 . -1
24,0
17,2
11.3
R
0 •
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0,0
0,0
0,0
0.0
DISCOMFORT
YL x
1.50
1.50
0,50
0.60
2.00
1.20
2,50
0.3ff
1.00
1.00
2.00
0,30
1.00
1.00
1,00
0,80
1,50
1.21
0.63
2«00
2.50
1.50
1,30
3.70
1.7Q
3.7o
1.30
2.00
2,00
2.7Q
1.40
1.50
1.50
1.35
1.50
2.50
2,06
0.82
YU T
2«5o 12
4.00 5
2.50 3
2.7o 1 «
6.00 3
2.70 5
5.00 13
3,?0 '-
3.00 \2 •
3.00 l«-
4.00 10
2.20 ' .-
2.00
2.70 ! ~
2.S5 11.-'
2.50
4,00 '. - . 0
3,25 : ! . •
1.13
*'
n
n
0
0
n
n
n
n
n
' 0
n
n
n
n
0,i
0. 1
0, 1
O.n
!}. 0
-------
POLLUTANT CODE • ?
POPULATION CAUGraY CODE « 11
PER CEM Or PO' AFFECTED = 50
POLLUTANT » NITROGEN DIOXIDE
CATEGORY a BACT. PNEUMONIA
ROUND
INCAPACITY
DOCTOR YL x
2 7.00
3 3.50
4 4,0o
5 3,00
7 10.00
8 2,00
' ' 9 10.00
10' 1,60
11 2.00
12 4.00
13 4.00
14 3.00
15 3,00
16 6.00
•MED:iS 3.75
FI»ST 3ijA5 3.00
TwiPO G'JAS e.OO
APJT'lMFA"', 4 , 5 1
STA\OA»r DEV 2,75
8.00
4.50
7.00
6.00
14.00
3.20
12.50
3.40
4,00
6.00
5.00
3,60
*
5.00
7.00
5.51
4,00
7,00
6,37
3.27
YU
9.00
7,00
10,00
8.00
22.00
4.70
15.00
5.10
8.60
10.00
6.00
4030
7.00
fi.OO
3 , 0 0
6.00
if, 00
* , 9 1
4,66
T
36
20
26
72
24
24
36
12
24
36
20
36
24
36
25.0
2* .0
16.0
30.4
14.2
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0,0
0.0
DISABILITY
YL *
4.00
2.50
3.50
2.00
3.00
1.70
7.50
1 .20
1.50
3.00
3.70
2,30
2.00
3.20
2.75
2.00
3,50
2,94
I.S7
b«00
3,50
6.00
3.00
0,00
3.00
10.00
2.90
3.00
4.00
4.30
2.90
J.oo
4.00
4,00
3.00
5.00
4.47
1.93
YU
6.00
5.00
9.00
7.00
10.00
4.20
12.50
4.60
4.50
5.00
5.00
3.60
4.00
5.00
5.00
4.50
7,00
6.10
2.62
T
24
10
18
46
16
10
24
6
12
24
15
24
6
6
15.5
10.-;
2 «.*!'>
17.*
11,3
R
0
0
0
0
0.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0,0.
0.0
0.0
0.0
0 .0
DISCOMFORT
YL x
3.00
2.50
2.50
0.90
2.50
1.60
5.00
0.80
1.50
2.00
2.90
1.60
1.50
3.20
2.25
1.50
2.90
2.25
1.10
3,50
3.50
3.50
2.20
5.00
2,60
7.5o
2,20
2.50
3.00
3.50
2.30
2.50
3,70
3.25
2.50
3.50
3.39
1.41
YU
*.oo
5.00
4.50
3. (SO
8.00
3.70
10.00
4,00
4.00
4.00
4.50
2.80
3.50
4.80
4.00
3.7f,
4.=0
4. 74
1.93
T
12
5
10
24
8
5
18
5
12
18
10
12
6
18
il.O
6.0
; a.o
i 1.6
5.9
»
a
0
n
0
0
n
ft
ft
0
ft
• ft
ft
n
ft
ft
O.n
0,1
0.1
O.n
0,o
-------
PiOF. 100
ATJO-; CA~EGC?Y CODE « u
re? CENT G' POP AFFECTED e 90
POLLUTANT » NITROGEN DIOXIDE
CATEGORY 8 BICT, PNEUMONIA
ROUND
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
i 5
16
-i r ~ T i >>j
•I = ST QUA=
:-:=: GUA=
ISITi- U£AN
;7A\Oi3: CEV
INCA'A.
YL
8,00
3.50
5.00
4.00
12.00
2.40
12.50
2.10
3.00
6,00
4,7o
3.^0
4.00
7.00
4,35
3,3"
6 , " 0
5,72
3.34
CITY
X
10.00
5.00
9.00
7.00
15.00
4,00
15,00
4,20
5,00
10.00
5. SO
4.60
*
6.00
8,00
; c. ••.
j » - .
5 , o ^
* •• r1 .^
7,7-
3.68
YU
12.00
10,00
14.00
9.00
25.00
5.60
17,50
5,50
9 . C 0
12.00
6,10
6,00
3,00
<5 , 0 0
9 , ') 0
6,10
1 ; . CO
! '• * P
5.3?
T
36
20
28
72
24
48
36
12
2*
36
20
36
24
3 «,
3 2 . •:•
24,0
36,0
32,3
U.8
P
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
r,
0,0
0,0
0,0
0,0
0,0
DISABILITY
YU *
4.00
3.00
4.00
3.00
4.00
2.30
7,50
1 ,30
2.00
6.00
4,00
2,90
3,00
6.00
^,50
2.90
i. « 0 0
3.64
1.59
6.00
Soo
7.00
6.00
7.00
. 3 -.70
10.00
<:.8o
3,50
6.00
4.50
3,40
i>,CO
5.00
5,00
3,70
7.00
5.4?
2,04
YU
6.00
8,00
10.00
9,00
12.00
6,00
12.50
4.60
5,00
10.00
5,70
4.20
7,00
6.00
7, SO
5,70
10,00
7,64
2.66
T
2*
10
24
48
16
10
24
6
12
2*
15
2*
6
6
15,5
10,0
24.0
17,8
11,4
R
0
0
0
0 '
0
0
0 .
0
0-
o •
0.
0
0
0
0,0
0.0
0,0
0,0.
o.o-
DISCOMFORT
YL * x
3.50
3.00
3.50
2.10
3.00
2.00
5.00
0.80
2.00
3,00
3.20
1,90
2.50
3,70
3,00
2,00
3.50
2.30
1,02
4.00
4.00
4.50
3,00
6.00
3.20
7.50
2.20
3.00
4,00
3.70
2.60
4,00
4.50
4.00
3.00
4.50
4.01
1.33
YU
4.50
8.00
5.50
4.20
lo.no
4.20
! 10.00 •
4.00
4.50
5,00
4.70
3.30
5.50
5.00
4.65
4.20
5.50
5,60
2.15
T
12
10
12
24
e
5
18
5
12
18
10
12
6
18
12,0
8.0
iS.O
12.1
5,6
R
n
n
n
0
n
n
0
n
0
• n
n
0
n
n
0,i
0,i
0,1
o,n
0,o
-------
101
POLLUTANT cooc
POLLUTANT « NITROGEN DIOXIDE
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE
PEP CENT OF POP AFFECTED
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
MEDIAN
FI = ST OCAP
THJPO OL'AR
ARIT" ME AS'
STANDARD CEV
INCAPACITY
YL X
1.5Q
1.00
2.50
1.40
2.00
1.70
4.00
0.90
1.00
1 .00
2.30
0.7o
1.00
6.00
1.45
1.00
2.30
1.^3
1.46
2.00
2.00
3.50
2.20
3.00
2.70
5.00
2.70
2.50
2.00
3.00
1.30
I
2.00
7.00
2.6?
2.0C
3.00
2.92
1-47
• 12
B 0
YU
2.50
4.00
4.50
3.10
6,00
4.00
6.00
4,10
4.40
3.00
3.50
1.70
3.00
6.00
4,00
3.00
4. 40
3,99
1.54
CATEGORY » CHRONIC RESP
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0,0
0,0
0.0
DISABILITY.
YL x
1.10
1.00
1.00
l.lo
1.50
1.40
2.50
0.80
0.50
0.50
1.50
0.30
' 0.50
3.40
1,05
0.50
1.50
'' 1.22
0.85
1 .60
2.00
1.50
1 .60
2.70
2.30
3,70
1.90
1.50
1.50
2.20
0.30
1.00
4.00
1.75
1.53
•J.30
2.02
0.92
DIS
ROUND • 2
YU
2.00 .,
4.00
2.50
2.60
3.60
3.30
5.00
3.40
2.90
2.50
3.00
1.30
2.40
.5.00
2.95
2.50
3.60
3.11
1.05
T
0
0
0
0.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
'o.o
0.0
0.0
a.o
0.0
DISCOMFORT
YL x
0.50
0.70
0.50
0.20
1.00 .
1.10
1.00
0,40
.0.20
0.50
0.80
0.20
0.20
0.80
0.50
,0,20 "
0.80
0.58
0.32
1.00
1.50
1.00
0.70
1.30
1.70
2.00
1.20
1,00
1.00
1.50
0.40
0.50
1.00
1.00
1.00
1,50
1.13
0.45
YU
1.50
3,50
1.60
1.50
1.50
2.7P
3,00
3.10
2.00
2. on
2*40
0,90
1.5n'
1 .RA
1.90
1.50
2.7fl
2,07
0.76
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
a
f)
n
n
(1
0
n
n
n
n
' n
n
• n
n
n
0,0
0.0
0,n
0,0
O.fl
-------
102
POLLUTANT coo? « 2
POLLUTANT • NITROGEN
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE
i '
PER CENT OF POP' AFFECTED
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
•12
13
14
' 15
16
MEDIAN
FJ3ST CUAB
7 ."1=0 Qi_i =
APJTH V£AN
STiSOARP CEV
INCAPACITY
YL x
4.00
2.50
3.50
3.30
9.00
2.20
7.50
1.20
1.50
2.00
3.30
1 .80
2, CO
7.00
2.?0
2.00
•* M •'; •*:
3.*3
2. '5
5.00
3.50
5.50
3.80
14,00
3,7o
10.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
4.00
2,60
»
3.00
8,00
3.75
3.00
5.50
5,15
3.32
» 12
a 10
YU
7.50
5.00
10.00
4.60
22.00
5.90
12.50
4.50
5.00
4.00
4,50
3.30
4.00
9.00
5,00
4,50
9,00
7.27
5.01
CATEGORY » CHRONIC RESP
T
36
36
20
60
24
48
36
28
36
36
20
36
48
72
36,0
23.0
42,0
33,3
14.7
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0..0
0.0
0.0
0,0
0,0
DISABILITY
YL *
3.00
2.50
2.50
2.60
8.00
2.00
5,00
1.00
1.00'
1.5Q
2.70
1.20
1 .00
4.40
2.53
1.20
3,00
2.74
1.95
'.50
3.50
4.50
J.30
12.00
3.30
7.00
2.40
2.50
2.50
•3.30
1 .70
-------
101
POLLUUNT CODE » 2
POLLUTANT • NITROGEN DIOXIDE
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE
i "
PER CFNT OF POP' AFFECTED
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
;i2
13
1*
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST QUAR
THIR3 QUAR
ARiT* MEAN
STANDARD OEV
INCAPACITY
YL x
7.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
11.00
2.80
10.00
1.7Q
2.00
3.00
4.20
2.70
3.00
8,00
3.50
2.8o
7.00
*.8l
3.00
8.00
4.00
7.00
e.oo
16.00
4.80
12.50
3.30
4.00
4.00
5.00
3.30
»
4.00
9.00
4,90
4.00
e.oo
6.64
3.80
• 12
« 50
YU
9,00
8.00
12,00
10.00
25.00
7.60
15.00
5.00
8.00
5.00
5.80
4.00
5.00
10.00
8.00
5.00
10.00
9.24
5.47
CATEGORY • 'CHRONIC RESP
T
36
36
22
72
24
48
36
28
36
36
20
36
48
72
36.0
28.0
48.0
39.3
16.1
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISABILITY
YL *
3.50
3.00
3.50
3.00
9.00
2.60
7.50
1.20
1.50
2.00
3.70
1.90
1.50
6.00
3.00
1.90
3.70
3.56
2.35
4.50
Soo
6.00
5.00
/
i*.oo
4.20
10.00
2.70
3.50
3.00
4.20
2.60
3.00
7.00
4.20
J.oo
6.00
5.26
3.21
DIS
ROUND «
YU
6.00
6.00
11.00
8.00
21.00
6.80
12.50
4.80
6.00
4.00
5.00
3.30
4.50
8.00
6.00
4.80
8.00
•7.64
4.64
2
T
18
36
18
48
2*
2*
30
20
12
.36
15
2*
24
120
24.0
18.0
36.0
32.1
27.1
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
OlSjCOMFORT
YL x-
3.00
2.50
3.00
2,50
3.00
2.20
5.00
0.80
1.50
1.50
2.30
1.30
1.00
1.80
2.25
1.50
3.00
2.24
1.08
3.50
3.50
4.00
3.30
6.00
3.70
j
7.50
2.20
3.00
2.50
3.10
1.80
2,00
2.60
3.20
2.50
3.70
3.48
1.56
YU
4.00
5.00
5.00
4.50
11.00
5.90
10.00
4.00
5.00
3.50
3.90
2.60
• 3,00
4,00
4.25
3.9ft
5. on
5.10
2.4S
T
IZ
5
10
24
6
10
24
8
12
18
10
12
4
18
11.0
8.0
18.0
12.4
6.4
R
n
0
0
0
n
0
0
n
0
• n
0
n
n
n
o.n
O.n
o.n
O.n
O.n
-------
C£NT
^IH' » 2
caTEGosY coot » 12
?0f' AFFECTED * 53
POLU?' ANT • NITROGEN DIOXIDE
RY m CHRONIC RESP 01S
ROUND
• 2
iNCiPACjT,'
js> VU r, YU T
2 6«00 lG«tG l*tCO 36
3 4.40 *.«0 in. CO 36
* S.*0 *.«« 13. «0 2*
5 »>.00 «»«3 U.C3 ?2
? 13.50 *G«CO 28.05 2*
V. 3,3r 5,S$ T.79 *8
9 52.^0 i'S.OS I'.SO 3*
-,:• *.:jo . 4.*o s«20 30
11 ?.5o 5,80 <»,?0 36
?2 3,oO 5,00 R.SO 36
13 £,00 5.05 7. CO ?»
1* 3,*-J «,20 **33 3*
*
IS 3.C$ =,00 *..05 *8
ifr -«.55 10«SC 11.00 7£
,N o.S.1) 6*CC 9.55 3fc.O
• OyAC 3.00 5«'JC 7,70 30,0
5 «u*j» 8,00 iO»0
-------
CAll" A * *
PClLUTiNT COOT a ?
POPULATION csT£!3oDr COCE • n
PER CENT OF PCS> AFFECTED » o
103
POLLUTANT « NITBQOEN
CATEGOS? • M CHPN OgST LUNG
ROUND « 2
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
•12
13
14
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST QUAO
TH13D OUAQ
AR17>-< MEAS
STANDARD OEV
INCAPACITY
YL x
1.60
1.50
l.So
1 .40
2.20
1.70
4.00
1.00
2.00
0,50
1.70
0.<30
1-.-5-0
6.00 -
1.55
1.40
2.00
1,96
1.41
2.00
2,50
2.00
2.20
3,00
2.50
5.00
2.00
3.00
. 1.50
2.7o
t 1.40
2 .0 0
7.00
2.35
2.00
3.00
2.77
1 .50
YU
2.50
3,50
3.50
3. 10
4,00
3.50
6.00
4.30
4.50
2.00
3.40
2.00
3.5-0
8.00
3.50
3.10
4 i30
3,84
1 ,58
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
p
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
o.o
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0,0
0.0
0,0
0.0
0.0
DISABILITY
YL *
1.00
0,80
O.TO
1.10
1,70
1.20
2.50
0.40
1.00
0.50
1.20
0.40
0.70
2.00
1.00
o .TO
1.20
1.09
0«62
1.50
1.50
1 ,4Q
, 1.70
2,»0
2.10
4.20
1.40
2.00
1.00
1.90
0.90
1.50
2.50
1.60
1.40
2,10
1.86
0.82
YU
2.00
3.00
2.70
2.70
3.00
2.90
5.00
3.30
3.00
2.00
2.90
1.40
?.20
3.00
2.90
2.20
3.00
2.79
0-83
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0,0
0.0
0.0
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISC'OMFORT .
YL x
0.50
0,80
0.20
0.20
1.00
0.80
1.00
0.40
0.50
0,20
0,40
0,20
0.20
0.80
0,45
0.20
0.60
0.51
0.31
1.00
1.50 "»
0.50
0.70
1.30
1.50
I
2.00
1.00
1.50
0,50 .
1.00
0.50
0.7Q
1.30
1.00
0.70
1.50
1.07
0.46
YU
It50
2,50
1.00
1.60
1.50
2.30
3.00
2.PO
2.50
1.50
2.20
1.00
1 . 20
1.80
1.70
1.50
2.50
1.89 r, .
0.66
w
n
n
n
n-
n
.1
.1
.1
•>
n
•1
.1
o
n
• . 1
. -i
.1
• . 1
, 1
-------
PA1E
'POLLUTANT CODE " 2
POLLUTANT « NITROGEN DIOXIDE
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE
PER CEKT OF POP AFFECTED
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
;i2
13
14
15
16
^EDIAN
FIRST OUAR
THI30 OijAS
AP3T* MEAN'
STANDARD CEV
INCAPACITY
YL x
3.00
2,5o
1.50
3.20
9.00
2.20
5.00
1.30
2.00
1.5o
2.90
2.00
2.00
7.00
2.35
2. CO
3.20
3,21
?.27
3.50
3.50
2.50
3.70
14.00
3.50
8.00
3.70
3.50
2.5o
3.70
2.60
>
3.00
s.oo
3.50
3. CO
3.70
4. 65
3.21
» 13
o 10
YU
4.50
5.00
4.00
' 4,70
22.00
4,90
12.50
5.20
5.00
3,50
4.50
3.30
4.00
9.00
4,30
4.00
5.20
6.59
5.07
CATEGORY « M 'CHRN OSST LUNG
ROUND • 2
T
36
20
24
48
24
49
36
15
24
36
20
24
36
72
30.0
24.0
36.0
23,1
15.2
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
OtO
0,0
0.0
0.0
DISABILITY
YL *
3.00
1.50
1.00
2.60
7.00
1.70
5.00
0.80
2.00
1.00
2.00
1.30
1.00
3.80
1.85
1.00
3.00
2.41
1.79
3.50
2,50
^.00
3.30
10.00
' 3.00
7.50
2.80
3.00
-------
CALIF ARR
PAOC 107
POLLUTANT CODE e 2
POLLUTANT » NITROGEN DIOXIDE
POPULATION CATE
PER CENT OF POP
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
:i2
13
14
15
16
N"EDI4N
FIPST OUAS
THIPO QUA?
ARIT* MEAN'
STAVOARC DEV
GORY CODE
'1*
'AFFECTED
INCAPACITY
YL x
3.5Q
3.50
1.50
5.00
11.00
2.70
10.00
1.60
3.00
2.5Q
3.60
2,70
3.00
8.00
3.25
2.^0
5.00
4.*0
3.0«
4.00
5.00
3.00
8.00
16.00
4.50
12.50
3.70
5.00
3.00
4.70
3.50
»
5.00
9.00
4.85
3.70
8.00
6.21
3.87
» 13
n 50
YU
4.90
8.00
4.50
10.00
25.00
7,20
15.00
5.10
8.00
. 5,00
5.50
4.30
7.00
10.00
7.10
5.00
10.00
8,54
5.57
CATEGORY o M CHRN OBST
T
36
20
24
72
24
48
36
10
24
36
20
24
36
72
30.0
24.0
36.0
34,4
18.5
R
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0,0
0.0
0,0
0,0
o.o
DISABILITY
YL X
3.00
2.00
1,50
3.00
8.00
2.30
7.5Q
1.20
2,50
1.50
3.40
1.70
'2.00
5.00
2.4Q
1.7o
3,40
3.19
2-17
'.50
3.00
2.50
. 5«00
13.00
4.00
10,00
J.OO
4.50
2.50
3,80
2,40
3.00
6,50-
3.65
•?.oo
b.OO
4.69
3.09
LUNG
ROUND
YU
4.00
5.00
3.50
8.00
?0.00
6.30
12.50
5.00
7,00
3.50
5.00
3.20
4.00
6.00
5.00
4.00
7, CO
6,6*
4.55
« 2
T
24
?0
20
48
2*
24
30
6
12
24
15
24
18
96
24.0
18.0
2^.0
27,5
21.9
R
0 .
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
0 .
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
o.o'
o.o
DISCOMFORT
YL x
. 2.50
1.50
1,00
2.50
3.00
2.10
5.00
0,80
2.00
1.00
2.00
1.20
1.50
1.70
1.85
1.20
2.50
1.99
1,06
3.00
2.50
2.00
3,30
6.00
3,50
7.5o
2.00
3.50
2.00
2.80
1.90
2.00
2.50
2.65
2.00
3.50
3.18
1 .64
YU
3.50
4.50
3.00
4,50
11.00
4.90
10.00
3.80
5.00
3.00
4.00
2,70
3.00
3.80
3.90
3.00
4.90
4.76
2.54
T
12
5
14
0
6
10
?4
5
1?
12
10
12
4
18
1 1.0
5.0
1?.0
! 0 . 3
6.2
8
0
0
n
n
n
0
n
ft
n
' n
n
n
n
0
O.n
O.n
O.n
o.o
0 « 1
-------
CALIF Afi9
POLLUTANT CODE " 2
POLLUTANT a NITROGEN DIOXIDE
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE
PER CENT OF POP'AFFECTED
INCAPACITY
DOCTOR YL X
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
:i2
13
14
15
16
MEDIAN
FISST QUAP
THIRD OUAP
ASIT* MEAN
STANDARD OEV
4.00
4.00
2.00
6.00
13,00
3.30
12.5Q
2.20
3,00
4.00
4.80
3.70
4.0.0
9.00
*.oo
3.30
6.00
5.39
3,56
6.00
6.00
4.00
9,00
20.00
5.50
15.00
4.10
8.00
6,00
6,00
4.50
»
6.00
10.00
6,00
5.50
9.00
7.5*
4.54
» 13
" 90
YU
8.00
10.00
6,00
11.00
28,00
7.70
17,00
6,00
12,00
8.00
6,80
5,50
10.00
11.00
9,00
&,eo
11*00
1?.50
5,3*
T
36
20
24
72
24
48
36
10
24
36
20
24
36
72
30,0
24.Q
36 .0
34, i
13,5
CATEGORY B w CHRN OSST LUNG
ROUND » 2
DISABILITY
R YL * YU T
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0,0
0,0
0.0
c.o
0.0
4.00
3.00
2.00
4.00
10.00
3.00
lo.oo
1.30
3.00 '
3.00
3.90
2.70
3.00
7.00
3,00
3.00
4.00
4,28
•2.74
. 4.5o
4.00
3,00
6,00
1S>.00
5.00
12.50
3.20
6,00
Soo
4.60
3,40
5.00
8.00
4,30
*.oo
6.00
6.01
3.56
5.00
5.00 '
4.00
9,00
22.00
7.00
15.00
5.00
10.00
5,00
5.20
4,20
7.00
9.00
6,10
5.00
9.00
P. 03
5,02
24
20
20
48
24
24
30
6
12
24
15
?4
18
96
24,0
18.0
2».0
27,5
21,5
R
0
0
0
0
0
o •
0
0
d
0
0
0
6
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
O.'O
DISCOMFORT
YL x
3.00
2.00
1.50
2.7Q
4,00
2.70
7.50
1.10
2,50
2,00
3.00
2,00
2.50
3.00
2,60
2.00
3,00
2.82
1.53
3.5fl
3.00
2.50
3.80
7,00
4.50
10.00
2.40
4.00
3.00
3.60
2.7Q
3.50
4.00
3.55
3.00
4.00
4.11
2.04
YU
4.00
5.00
3.50
4.70
12.00
7.?0
12.50
4.10
6.00
4.00
4.40
3,50
' 4.50
5 . o n
4.60
4.00
6.0*
5.7*
2.93
T
12
5
16
24
6
10
24
5
12
12
10
12
4
Ifl
12.0
6.0
16.0
• ?.l
-..5
Q
n
n
o
n
o
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
O.n
O.n
o.n
0.0
O.o
-------
CALIF ARB
PAOF 109
POLLUTANT CODE • 2
POLLUTANT « NITROGEN DIOXIDE
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE
1"
PER CENT OF POP'AFFECTEO
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
•12 . .
13
14
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST QUAR
THIRD QUAR
ARITH MEAN
STANDARD DEV
INCAPACITY
YL x
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.90
1.40
1.10
1,00
0.70
1.50
. 0.20
1.70
0.70
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.9Q
1.10
1.01
0.37
1.50
2.50
2.00
1.80
2.00
1.70
2,00
1.70
2,50
0.50
2.50
1,20
1.50
1.50
1.75
1.50
2.00
1,73
0.55
• 14
a 0
YU
2.00
4.00
3.10
3.20
2.50
2.70
3.00
3.30
4,00
0,70
3.50
1.70
3.00
2.50
3.00
2.50
3.30
2.80
0.89
CATEGORY o S CHRN 08ST LUNG
ROUND a
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0,0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0,0
0.0
0,0
0.0
0.0
DISABILITY
YL *
0.50
0,80
1.00
0.50
l.*0
0.80
O.fcO
0.20
1.00
0.20
1.00
0.20
0.60
0.70
0.65
0«50
1.00
0.68
0.35
1.00
1.50
1.50
1.40
2.00
1.50
1.00
0.90
2.00
0.50
1.70
0.70
1.00
1.20
1.30
1.00
1.50
1.28
0.46
YU
1.50
3.50
2.60
a. 70
2.40
2,20
2.50
2.50 .
3,50
0.70
2.50
1.30
2.00
2.20
2.45
2.00
2.60
2.29
0.76
> 2
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
R
0
0
0
0
0
o'
0
0
.0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0,0
0,0
DISCOMFORT
YL x
0.20
o.ao •
0.20
0.20
. 1.20
0.60
0.40
0.20
0.60
0.20
0.50
0.20
0.20
0.50
0.30
0.20
0.60
0.43
0,30
0,50
1,50
0.50
0.60
1.50
1.20.
0.80
0.70
1.50
0.50
1.00
0.30
0.60
1.00
0,75
0.50
1.20
0.87
0.42
YU
1.00
3.50
2. no
1.80
1.70
1 .60
1 .00
2,?0
2.60
o.7r,
1.50
O.Pfl
1.50
l.fl"
1.65
1-00
2.00
1.69
0.75
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
p
0
n
n
0
0
n
n
0
n
n
n
n
0
n
o.n
o.n
o.n
o.n
o.n
-------
ARH
PAGE no
POLLUTANT CODE • 2
POLLUTANT » NITROGEN DIOXIDE
POPULATION CATE
PER CENT OF POP
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
6
9
10
11 '
:i2
13
14
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST QU-AR
THIRD OUAR
ARITH MEAN
STANDARD DEV
GORY CODE
';'
AFFECTED
0 1*
" 10
CATEGORY « S CHRN OBST LUNG
ROUND
INCAPACITY
YL
2.5o
1.50
1.00
2.00
4.00
1.70
6,00
1.30
2.00
1.00
2.20
1.40
l.So
3.50
1.65
1.4Q
2.50
2.26
1.39
X
3.00
. 3.00
2,00
5.00
8.00
2.70
7.00
3.00
3.00
2.00
3,00
*2.20
2.5o
4.00
3,00
2.50
4.00
3.60
1.84
YU
3.50
5.00
3,50
7,00
12.00
3.70
8.00
4.70
4.50
3.00
4.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
4.25
3.50
5.00
5.06
2.46
T
36
30
20
96
24
48
40
15
24
48
28
36
24
96
33.0
24.0
46.0
40.4
25.5
R
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0,0
0.0
0.0
0,0
0,0
• 2
DISABILITY
YL
1.5o
1.00
1.00
1.5-0
3.50
1.30
5.00
1.20
1.50
1.00
1.50
0.70
'1.00
1.50
l.*0
1.00
1.50
1.66
1.17
X
• 00
2.00
2.00
'*.oo
5.00
2.30
?.oo
2.40
2.50
1.50
2.50
1.50
2.00
2.50
2.35
*.00
2.50
2.73
1.33
YU
2.50
4.50
3.00
6,00
8.00
3.20
7.00
4.10
4.00
2.50
3.30
2.20
3.00
4.00
3.65
3.00
4*50
4.09
1.75
T
2*
30
15
72
24
24
34
10
12
36
20
24
18
120
24.0
18.0
34.0
33.1
29.2
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0,0.
0,0
0.0
*
DISCOMFORT
YL
1.00
0.80
0.50
0.60
1.30
1.10
4.00
0.70
1.10
0,50
0.90
' 0.20
1.00
0.70
0.85
0.60
1.10
1.03
0.90
X
It5o
1.50
1.00
1.00
2.50
1.70
5.00
1.70
2.00
1.00
1.6Q
0.90
1.50
1.40
1.50
1.00
1,70
1.74
1.04
YU
2«00
4.00
2.10
2.20
3.60
! 2.70
6.00
3.60
3.10
2.00
2.60
1.60
2.00
2.40
2,50
2.00
3.60
2.85
1.16
T
12
10
10
48
6
10
26
e
12
16
15
12
8
30
12.0
10.0
16.0
15.9
11.5
B
0
n
0
n
n
0
0
0
ft
' 0
0
n
. n
n
O.o
0.0
O.n
O.n
O.n
-------
CALIF APR
in
POLLUTANT CODE » 2
POLLUTANT « NITROGEN DIOXIDE
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE
PER CEKT OF POP' AFFECTED
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
'.12
13
14
15
16
MEDIAN
FISST OUAR
THIRD QUAR
ARITH MEAN
STANDARD OEV
INCAPACITY
YL X
4.00
2.50
1.50
3.00
6,00
2.00
7. So
1.30
2.50
2.00
2.70
2.10
2.10
4.50
2,50
2.00
4.00
3.12
1.79
6.00
•3.50
2,50
6.00
10.00
3.20
8.70
3.30
4.00
3.00
3.70
2.90
3.50
5.00
3.60
3.20
6.00
4.66 .
2.27
n 14
« 50
YU
8.00
5.00
4,60
8,00
14.00
4,70
10.00
5.00
6,00
4,50
4.50
3,70
5.00
6.00
5.00
4.60
8.00
6,36
2.81
CATEGORY a S CHRN OflST
T
36
30
24
96
24
48
40
20
24
49
28
36
2*
96
33.0
24,0
48.0
41,0
24.9
R
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0,0
0.0
0.0
DISABILITY
YL *
3.5Q
1.00
1.00
2.00
4.00
1.70
6.00
0.60
3.50
1.00
2.20
1.50
1,50
2.50
1.85
1.00
3.50
2.29
l«5o
*»00
2.00
2.00
5.00
• T.OO
3.00
7.00
2.50
3.50
^•00
3.10
2.20
*.50
4.00
3,05
2.20
4.00
3.56
1.71
LUNQ
ROUND
YU
4.50
4.50
4.10
7,00
10,00
4,3Q
8.00
4.50
0,50
3,00
3.80
3.00
3.50
5.00
4,40
3,50
5.00
4.69
2.33
» 2
T
2*
30
20
96
24
24
34
18
12
36
20
24
18
120
24.0
20.0
34.0
35.7
31.6
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0-0
*
DISCOMFORT
YL x
2.50
1,00
0.60
0.90
1.50
1,70
5.00
1.10
1.50
1.00
1.50
0,80
1.00
1,50
1.30
1.00
1.50
1.54
1.10
3.00
2.00
1.50
2.20
3.00
2.70
6.00
2.00
3.00
I.SQ
2,30
1.50
2.00
2.00
2.10
2.00
3.00
2.48
1.15
YU
3.50
4.00
3.50
3.60
3.7Q
3.70
7.00
4.60
4.50
2.50
5.30
2'. 10
3.00
3.00
3.65
3.00
4.50
3.86
I. 23
T
12
10
14
48
6
10
26
10
12
18
18
12
8
30
12,0
10.0
18.0
16.7
1L2
9
0
.0
n
n
0
0
n
n
0
' 0
n
n
n
0
O.fl
O.n
O.n
O.n
0«n
-------
CALIP ARfl
PAOE 112
POLLUTANT CODE a 2
POLLUTANT <» NITROGEN DIOXIDE
POPULATION CATEGORY coot
< '
PER CENT OF POP' AFFECTED
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
:*2
13
14
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST QUAP
THIRD QUAR
ARITH MEAN
STANDARD OEV
INCAPACITY
YL x
6.00
2.5o
1.50
4.00
8.00
2.70
9.00
l.So
2.50
3.00
3.80
3.5o
3.00
5.50
3.25
2. 50
5.50
4.06
2.27
8.00
4.00
3.00
6,00
12,00
'4,50
10.00
4.00
4.50
4.00
4.50
*4.10
5,00
6,00
4,50
4.00
6. CO
5,69
2.59
» 14
» 90
YU
10.00
6,00
5,00
a. oo
16.00
6.30
11.00
6.00
8.00
5,00
5,50
5.00
7.00
6.50
6.40
5.50
8,00
7,52
3.05
CATEGORY a S CHRN OBST
T
36
30
24
96
24
48
40
20
24
48
28
36
24
96
33.0
24.0
48.0
41.0
24.9
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0,0
0.0
0.0
DISABILITY
YU *
4.00
2.00
1.40
3.00
5.00
2«20
7.50
1.20
2.50
.2.5o
3.10
2.50
1.50
4.00
2.50
2.00
4.00
3.03
1.68
6.00
3.00
2.50
/
5.00
. ?.00
3.70
0.00
3.20
4.00
3.50
J.80
3.20
J.oo
4.50
3.60
3,00
*.50
3.81
1.81
LUNG
ROUND
YU
8,00
5.0~0
4,00
7.00
11,00
5,9.0
10.00
5,10
6.00
4.50
4.60
3.70
4.90
5.00
5.05
4.60
7iOO
6,05
2.21
• 2
T
24
30
20
96
24
24
34
18
12
36
20
24
16
.120
24,0
20.0
34.0
35.7
31.6
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o .
0
0
0
0,0
0.0
0.0-
0.0
0,0
•
DISCOMFORT
YL x
4,00
2.00
1.00
2,00
2.00
2.00
6.00
0.70
2.00
2.00
2.20
1.70
1.60
2.00
2,00
1,70
2,00 .
2.23
1.31
4.50
3.00
2.00
3.00
2.70
3.20
1.00
2.10
3.50
3.00
3.00
2,40
2.50
3,00
3,00
2.4Q
3.00
2,78
0.80
YU
5.00
4.50
4.00
4.20
4.00
4.7Q
0.00
4.00
5.00
4.00
. 3.«0
3.10
3.5o
4.00
4.00
3,80
4.50
3,84
1.23
T
12
10
16
48
6
10
26
10
1"2
18
18
12
q
30
12.0
10.0
16.0
16.9
11.2
fl
0
n
ft
0
n
0
0
n
n
0
n
n
n
n
O.n
O.n
0,0
o.n
O.n
-------
CALIF
PAOC 113
POLLUTANT CODE « 3
POLLUTANT B CARBON MONOXIDE
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE « i
. ;'
PER CENT OF POP AFFECTED ? 0
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
:i2
13
I*
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST QUAR
THIRD OUAR
ARITH MEAN
STANDARD OEV
INCAPACITY
YL X
so. do
100.00
60.00
62.00
lo'o.oo
600,00
80.00
130.00
40.00
40.00
110.00
30.00
80.00
90.00
80,00
60.00
100.00
11*. *3
142.65
100*00
125.00
100.00
95.00
140.00
1000,00
100.00
200.00
120.00
60.00
140.00
60/00
100.00
120.00
110,00
100.00
140.00
175.71
239.81
YU
120.00
150.00
140,00
142.00
180,00
1400,00
120,00
270.00
180,00
80.00
165.00
80,00
150.00
150.00
150,00
120.00
180.00
237,64
337.77
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
o.o
CATEGORY a NORMAL
R
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISABILITY
YL X
4Q.OO
75.00
40.00
50.00
30.00
300.00
60.00
75.00
40.00
20.00
70.00
20.00
3o.OO
40.00
40.00
30.00
70.00
63.57
70.53
60.00
100.00
80.00
80.00
50.00
500,00
80.00
130.00
80.00
*o.oo
loo.no
42,00
50.00
80.00
Sq.oo
50.00
100.00
105.14
116.39
ROUND a
YU
PO.OO
125.00
1PO.OO
118.00
70,00
700.00
100.00
185.00
1PO.OO
60,00
1?5.00
60.00
100,00
100.00
109.00
80.00
125.00
147.36
162.36
2
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0*0
0.0
0.0
0.0
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
.0.0
0,0
0*0
DISCOMFORT
. YL 'x
20.00
'• 30.00
22.00
25.00
25.00
50,00
40.00
5.00
10.00
10.00
35.00
7.00
5.00
20.00
21.00
10.00
30.00
21.71
13.75
30.00
50.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
80.00
60.00
20.00
40.00
20.00
60.00
20.00
10.00
50.00
45.00
20.00
60.00
42.14
20» 07
YU
40*00
70.00
100.00
85.00
50.00
110.00
80.00
so. on
eo. on
4o. on
100.00
38*00
20.00
75.no
72.50
4o.no
85.00
67, on
27.52
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
O.-T
4
n
0
n
n
0
n
n
0
n
n
n
n
n
n
0.0
C .n
0.0
o.n
o.n
-------
CALIP ARR
PAO?:
POLLUTANT CODE a 3
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE
POLLUTANT • CARBON MONOXIDE
CATEGORY o NORMAL
PER CENT OF POP AFFECTED « 10
DOCTOR
2
3
4
. 5
7
8
9
10
11
:12
13
1*
15
16
INCAPACITY
YL X
190.00
130.00
100.00
210.00
:*00.00
1200.00
160.00
325.00
100.00
*0'0.00
175.00
100.00
. 100.00
180.00
210«00
160.00
250.00
250.00
600.00
2000.00
180.00
400.00
180.00
500.00
200.00
1 3,0 . 0 0
150.00
200.00
YU
230.00
180.00
*00,00
275,00
800,00
2800,00
200.00
475.00
250.00
600.0.0
225.00
160,00
250.00
220,00
T
20
10
20
24
2*
24
24
20
12
24
20
2*
18
8
R
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
DISABILITY
YL *
120^00
100.00
118.00
110.00
200.00
360,00
1*0.00
• 130.00
80.00
1*0.00
1*0.00
85.00
70.00
130.00
lSu.00
125.00
16Q.OO
1*0.00
300.00
600.00
160.00
200.00
1*0.00
160.00
165.00
110.00
100.00
160.00
ROUND °
YU
18Q.OO
150.00
198.00
170.00
400.00
8*0.00
180.00
270.00
200,00
200.00
200.00
13?, 00
150.00
195.00
2
T
16
9
e
16
2*
12
20
6
12
24
10
24
e
10
R
0
0.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
DISCOMFORT
YL x
60.00
75.00
70.00
55.00
30.00
60.00
120,00
120.00
40.00
40.00
110.00
53.00
20.00
75.00
70»00
100.00
100.00
70.00
45.00
100.00
1*0.00
160.00
100,00
60.00
1*0.00
80.00
30.00
100.00
vu
8o»00
125.00
130.00
107.00
70.00
1*0.00
160.00
200.00
1*0.00
80.00
175.00
100.00
50.00
130.00
T
10
5
4
10
12
6
12
3
8
I8
5
12
4
6
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
n
n
n
' n
0
0
n
n
FIRST OUAR
THIRD OUAR
ARJTH MEAM
STANDARD DEV
177.50 205.00 250.00 20.0 0.0 125.00
100.00 180.00 220.00 18.0 0.0 100*00
325.00 400.00 475.00 24«0 0.0 140.00
269.29 386.*3 504.6* 19.4 0.0 137,36
287,72 485,03 685.61 5.6 0.0 7l«80
160.00 196.50 12.0 0.0 60,00 100.00
1*0.00 170.00 8.0 0»0 *0.00 70.00
165.00 200.00 20.0 0.0 75.00 100,00
19Q.71 247.50 13.9 0,0 66.29 92.50
127.Q5 182.77 6.8 o«0 31.?l 36.9*
127.50 7.0 0,0
80.00 5.0 O.fl
140.00 12«0 O.n
120.50 8.2 O.n
*?.?6 4.3 O.n
-------
CALIF AR9
POLLUTANT CODE • 3
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE » i
PA4E 119
POLLUTANT = CARBON MONOXIDE
CATEGORY « NOPMAL
PER CENT OF POP AFFECTED n 50
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
:i2
13
14
1-5.
16
INCAPACITY
YL X
230.00
175.00
200.00
250.00
500.00
1500.00
180.00
430.00
100.00
600.00
180,00
130.00
200,00
200.00
250.00
275.00
300.00
275,00
700.00
2500.00
200.00
500.00
200.00
700.00
220.00
160.00
A
2.50.00
220.00
YU
270.00
375,00
500.00
300,00
900.00
3500.00
220.00
57n.OO
300.00
800.00
260.00
200.00
300.0.0
240.00
T
20
10
20
24
24
24
24
20
12
24
20
24
18
8
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
DISABILITY
YL *
165.00
130.00
150.00
150.00
250.00
420.00
160,00
250.00
100.00
160.00
150.00
100.00
100.00
150.00
180.00
230.00
250.00
225.00
35Q.OO
700.00
180.00
300.00
180.00
180.00
180.00
120.00
150.00
185.0.0
ROUND a
YU
20.0.00
330.00
400.00
250.00
500.00
980.00
200.00
350.00
300.00
200.00
210.00
150.00
200.00
210.00
2
T
16
5
10
18
24
12
20
6
12
24
10
12
8
10
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
DISCOMFORT
YL x
105.00
85.00
90.00
80.00
30.00
90.00
140.00
160.00
80.00
80.00
135.00
80.00
30.00
85.00
120.00
135.00
120.00
110.00
50.00
140.00
160.00
200.00
120.00
100.00
160.00
100.00
50.00
120.00
YU
140.00
175.00
150.00
135.00
80.00
190.00
180.00
240.00
160.00
120.00
185.00
130.00
'80.00
160.00
r H
10 0
s n
i n
\f n
1 •> 0
t, ft
i? n
i n
fl n
lo 0
c n
12 0
4 n
6 n
MEDIAN
FIRST QUAP
THIRD OUAR
ARITM MEAN
STANDARD OEV
200.00 262.50
180.00 220.00
430.00 500.00
348.21 482,1*
362.16 607.28
300.00 20.0 0.0
260.00 18.0 0.0
570.00 24.0 0,0
623.93 19.4 0,0
855.84 5.6 0.0
150.00 182,50 230.00 '12.0 0.0 85.00 120.00
130.00 180.00 200.00 10.0 0.0 80.00 100,00
165.00 250.00 350.00 18.0 0.0 105.00 UO.OO
173.93 24-3.57 320.00 13.4 0.0 90,71 120.36
84.68 144.40 213.29 6.1 0.0 36.47 40.12
155.00 7.0 O.n
130.00 5.0 0.0
180.00 12"" °»°
151.79 8.5 0.0
42.99 4.3 0,0
-------
CALF
POLLUTANT CODE « 3
POLLUTANT » CARBON MONOXIDE
' POPULATION CATEGORY CODE « i CATEGORY » NORMAL
i"
PER CENT OF POP' AFFECTED « 90
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
:i2
13
14
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST QUAR
THIRD OUAR
ARITH MEAN
STANDARD DEV
INCAPACITY
YL x
270.00
250.00
250.00
200.00
600.00
1800,00
200.00
400.00
175.00
800.00
200,00
160.00
250.00
210.00
250.00
200.00
400,00
411.79
439.12
300.00
350.00
350,00
3oo.oo
800.00
3000,00
250.00
500.00
300.00
900.00
250.00
180.00
300tOO
t-
230.00
300.00
250.00
500.00
572,14
730.25
YU
330.00
450,00
500.00
350,00
1000.00
4200,00
300.00
600.00
500.00
1200.00
300.00
250.00
350.00
250.00
400.00
300.00
600.00
755.71
1030.53
T R
20 0
10 0
20 0
24 0
24 0
' 24 0
24 o
20 0
12 0
24 o
20 0
24 0
18 0
8 0
«
20.0 0,0
18.0 0.0
24.0 0,0
19.4 0.0
5,6 0.0
DISABILITY
YL X
220.00
200,00
200.00
175,00
300.00
540,00
160.00
200.00
150.00
16Q.OO
17Q.OO
100.00
150.00
180.00
177.50
160.00
200.00
207.50
105.73
250.00
300.00
250.00
259.00
450.00
900,00
•180.00
300.00
200.00
200.00
200.00
140.00
200,00
200,00
225.00
200.00
300.00
287.14
191.69
ROUND •
YU
280.00
400.00
300.00
300.00
600.00
1260.00
200.00
400.00
350,00
250.00
230.00
IflO.OO
25o.OO.
220.00
290.00
230.00
400.00
372.86
277.47
2
T R
16 0
5 0
10 0
18 0
24 0
12 0
20 0.
10 0
12 0
24 0
10 .0
12 0
a o
10 0
12.0 0.0
10.0 0.0
18.0 0.0
13,6 0.0
5,9 0..0
DISCOMFORT
YL x
125.00*
150.00
100.00
100.00
40.00
110.00
140.00
150.00
100.00
100.00
120.00
85.00
60.00
130.00
105.00
100.00
130.00
107.86
31.85
140.0.0
250.00
130.00
130.00
60.00
180.00
160.00
200.00
140.00
135,00
160.00
110.00
100.00
150.00
140.00
130.00
160.00
146,07
45,41
YU
160.00
350,00
160.00
155,00
90.00
250.00
160.00
! ?Sv .Oft
180.50
1*',.V,
259*80
145.39
1*9.80
m.jjo
;7S.90
i&soa
?ct.oo
; *t , 1 7
t i . 1 3
T
10
S
6
12
12
6
12
5
8
13
5
12
4
6
7.0
5.0
12.0
8.6
*.l
*
n
n
n
n
n
n
o
n
r\
n
n
0
n
n
O.n
O.n
O.n
O.n
O.n
-------
CALIF ARB
POLLUTANT CODE " 3
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE
«*
PER CENT OF POO AFFECTED
(
POLLUTANT • CARBON MONOXIDE
CATEGORY a CHILDREN
a?
ROUND • 2
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
;i2
13
14
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST QUAR
THIRD QUAR
ARITH MEAN
STANDARD DEV
INCAPACITY
YL x
80.00
50.00
40,00
75.00
:70.00
440.00
60.00
180.00
40.00
40.00
75.00
30,00
80.00
90.00
72.50
40.00
80.00
96.43
105.49
90«00
100,00
80.00
105.00
120.00
'eoo.oo
80.00
200.00
100,00
60.00
100.00
6 0*. 0 0
100.00
120.00
100.00
80.00
120.00
151.07
189.82
YU
100.00
150.00
120,00
165.00
160.00
1160.00
100.00
220.00
160.00
80.00
130.00
80,00
150.00
150.00
150.00
100.00
160,00
208.93
276.36
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 '
0.
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
o.o
R
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
o.o
0.0
DISABILITY
YL *
45.00
40.00
40.00
60.00
30.00
34Q.OO
4Q.OO
60.00
20,00
• 2o.OO
35.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
40.00
30.00
45.00
58.57
82.00
6u,QO
80,00
80.00
80.00
45.00
400.00
60.00
85.00
60.00
40,00
60.00
40.00
50.00
80.00
60.00
50.00
80.00
87.14
91.41
YU
80.00
120.00
120.00
105.00
60.00
560.00
80.00
125.00
100.00
60.00
100.00
60.00
100.00
100.00
100,00
80.00
120,0-0
126,43
126,76
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0,0
o.o
0.0
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISCOMFORT
YL x
22.00
30.00
30.00
10.00
20.00
35.00
20.00
10.00
10.00
20.00
10.00
10.00
5.00
20.00
20.00
10.00
22.00
18.00
9.19
30.00
50.00
60.00
20.00
30.00
60.00
40.00
20.00
40.00
40.00
20.00
20.00
10.00
50.00
35.00
20.00
50.00
35.00
16,05
YU.
38.00
70.00
92.00
40.00
40.00
85,00
60.00
40.00
60.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
20.00
75.00
55.00
40.00
75.00
56.43
21.45
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0,0
0.0
o.o
9
n
. n
n
0
n
o
0
n
n
' n
n
n
.n
0
0.0
o.n
o.o
0,0
O.n
-------
ARB
PAOC HO
POLLUTANT CODE « 3
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE « 2
i'
PER CENT OP POP AFFECTED • 10
POLLUTANT a CARBON MONOXIDE
CATEGORY • CHILDREN
ROUND a 2
DOCTOR
2
3
4
S
7
8
9
10
11
;i2
13
14
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST QUAR
THIRD OUAO
ARITH MEAN
STANDARD OEV
INCAPACITY
YL X
142.00
100.00
160.00
150,00
350.00
600.00
100.00
240.00
80,00
400.00
140-.00
100,00
100,00
1-80. -00.
146.00
100.00
2*0.00
203.00
H9.32
160,00
175.00
200.00
200.00
550.00
1000,00
120.00
300.00
160.00
«
500*00
160.00
130.00
isq.oo
200-0-00'
187,50
160«00
300.00
296,07
244,64
YU
180.00
250.00
300.00
225.00
750.00
1400.00
140,00
360.00
200.00
600.00
190.00
160,00
250.00
2-2-0-t-O-O
237,50
190.00
360.00
373,21
343.04
T
20
10
20
24
24
24
24
21
12
24
20
24
18
8
20.5
18. 0
24.0
19,5
5.6
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0,0
0.0
0,0
0,0
0.0
DISABILITY
YL .*
110.00
100.00
120.00
90.00
150.00
300.00
80.00
140.00
80.00
140.00
100.00
80,00
50.00
130.00
105.00
8Q.OO
uo.oo
119.29
59,29
130.00
150.00
160.00
125.00
cSo.OO
500.00
100.00
175.00
14Q.OO
160.00
120.00
107,00
100.00
160.00
145.00
120.00
160.00
169,79
102.59
YU
150.00
200.00
200.00
155.00
350.00
700.00
120.00
200.00 .
200.00
200.00
155.00
132.00
150.00
195.00
197.50
150.00
200.00
221.93
148. 2*
T
12
5
8
16
24
12
20
10
12
24
15
12
8
10
12.0
10.0
16.0
13.4
5.8
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 '_
0
0
0
0
0.0
o.o
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISCOMFORT
YL X
60.00
50.00
80,00
35.00
30,00
50,00
' 60,00
15,00
40,00
40.00
55.00
58,00
18.00
75.00
50.00
35.00
60.00
47,57
19.23
80.00
100.00
120.00
60.00
40.00
80.00
80.00
4Q.OO
80.00
60.00
80.00
80.00
30.00
100.00
80.00
60.00
80.00
73.57
25.30
YU
100.00
150.00
160.00
100.00
60.00
110.00
100.00
75.00
140.00
80.00
120.00
103,00
40.00
130.00
101.50
80.00
130.00
104,86
33.97
T
a
5
7
10
12
6
12
5
8
18
10
12
4
6
8.0
6.0
12.0
8.8
3.8
a
n
0
0
0
n
0
0
0
0
' 0
n
0
0
n
O.o
0
-------
CALIF ARB
POLLUTANT CODE • 3
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE » 2
'4*
PER CENT OF POP AFFECTED n 50
lit
POLLUTANT • CARBON MONOXIDE
CATEGORY « CHILDREN
ROUND a 2
INCAPACITY
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
e
9
10
11
:i2
13
u
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST QUAP
THIRD QUAS
ARITH MEAN
STANDARD CEV
YL
180.00
150.00
200.00
150.00
:450.00
7?0.00
1*0.00
350.00
100.00
600.00
175.00
125.00
200.00
200.00
190.00
150.00
350.00
267.14
191.66
X
200.00
230.00
250.00
2*0.00
650.00
120 0.00
160.00
400.00
200.00
700.00
200.00
1 6*0 . 0 0
250.00
220.00
235.00
200.00
400.00
361.43
295.97
YU
220,00
310.00
300.00
250.00
850.00
1680.00
180.00
450.00
300,00
800,00
225.00
200.00
300.00
240.00
300,00
225.00
451.00
450.36
411.89
T
20
10
20
24
24
24
24
15
12
24
20
24
18
8
20.0
15,0
24,0
19.1
5.7
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0,0
0.0
0.0
0.0
OoO
DISABILITY
YL
140.00
125.00
150.00
125.00
125.00
360.00
120,00
160.00
70.00
145,00
100,00
100.00
120.00
130.00
125.00
120.00
145.00
140.71
67.14
X
160.00
175.00
200.00
145.00
350.00
600.00
130.00
180.00
110.00
189.00
120.00
130.00
150.00.
170.00
165.00
130.00
180.00
200.00
128.98
YU
180.00
260.00
250.00
200.00
550.00
840,00
140.00
200.00
150.00
ilS.OO
160,00
170.00
160.00
200.00
200.00
170.00
250.00
265.36
194.31
T
12
5
10
10
12
12
72
1
4
24
24
4
8
4
10.0
4.0
12.0
14.4
18.0
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0,0
0.0
0,0
0«0
DISCOMFORT
YL
100.00
100.00
90.00
70.00
' 30,00
70.00
80.00
100.00
60.00
80.00
90.00
80.00
30.00
85.00
80.00
7o.OO
90.00
76.07
22.89
X
110.00
150.00
120.00
100.00
4Q.OO
120.00
100.00
120.00
100.00
100.00
120.00
100.00
50.00
120.00
105.00
100.00
120.00
103.57
28,45
YU
130.00
200,00
150.00
135.00
70.00
170.00
120.00
1*0.00
140.00
120,00
160.00
130,00
80,00
.160.00
137.50
120.00
160.00
136.07
33.64
T
8
5
6
12
12
6
12
5
8
18
10
12
4
6
8.0
6.0
12<0
8.9
4.0
n
0
0
n
0
0
n
n
n
n
' 0
0
0
n
f»
O.n
0,o
O.n
0,o
0«o
-------
ARS
PAGE no
POLLUTANT CODE • 3
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE » 2
'i*
PER CENT OF POP'AFFECTED « 90
POLLUTANT * CARBON MONOXIDE
CATEGORY » CHILDREN
ROUND
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
:'i2
13
1*
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST QUAR
THIRD QUAR
ARITM MEAN
STANDARD DEV
INCAPACITY
YL X
210.00
200.00
200.00
175.00
550.00
840.00
200.00
450.00
175.00
800.00
200.00
160.00
250.00
210.00
205.00
200.00
450.00
330.00
235.92
230.00
300.00
300.00
250.00
750.00
UOO.OO
250.00
500.00
300.00
900.00
230.00
180.00
300.00
230.00
300.00
230.00
500.00
437,14
348,99
YU
25Q.OO
400.00
500.00
300.00
950.00
1960.00
300.00
550.00
500.00
1200.00
260.00
250,00
350.00
290.00
375.00
290,00
550.00
575.71
487.19
T
20
10
20
24
24
24
24
15
12
2*
20
24
18
8
(
20,0
15.0
2^.0
19.1
5.7
R
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISABILITY
YL X
17Q.OO
175.00
200.00
150.00
250.00
420.00
160.00
160.00
1*0.00
16Q.OO
170.00
110.00
150.00
180.00
165,00
iSfl.OO
180.00
185.36
74.54
iBOcQO
275.00
25o,00
200,00
400.00
700,00
180.00
200.00
200,00
200,00
200.00
130,00
200.00
200.00
200.00
200.00
250.00
251.07
143.40
YU
200*00
375.00
300.00
275,00
550.00
980.00
200.00
240.00
350.00
":*0.00
230.00
155.00
25Q.OO
220.00
2*5,00
220.00
350.00
326.07
212.34
T
13
5
10
18
2*
12
20
5
12
2*
15
12
8
10
12.0
10. 0
18.0
13.4
6.2
R
0
o"
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0,0
0.0
DISCOMFORT
YL x
105.00
150.00
100.00
82,00
• 10.00
96.00
120.00
30.00
95.00
125.00
100.00
60,00
60.00
100.00
98.00
60.00
105.00
88.07
37.34
120.00
200.00
150.00
115,00
20.00
160.00
130.00
50.00
120.00
160.00
120.00
75,00
100.00
130.00
120.00
100.00
150,00
117.86
46,40
YU
1*0*00
250.00
200,00
155.00
37.00
224.00
1*0.00
60.00
150.00
195.00
1*0.00
100.00
1*0.00
160.00
1*5,00
1*0.00
195.00
1*9,36
58,10
T
8
5
6
15
3
6
48
1
4
2*
2*
2
2
3
5.5
3.0
15.0
10,8
13.2
ft
n
.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
' 0
0
n
n
0
0,n
0.0
0«o
0,o
0,0
-------
CALIF ARS
POLLUTANT CODE •> 3
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE « 3
PER CENT OF POP AFFECTED a 0
PAOC iti
POLLUTANT e CARBON MONOXIDE
CATEGORY « OLD AGE
ROUND * 2
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
:i2
13
14
V5
16
MEDIAN
FIRST QUAR
THIRD QUAR
ARITH MEAN
STANDARD OEV
INCAPACITY
YL x
70,00
50,00
60.00
55.00
90.00
440.00
60.00
165,00
60.00
4.0.00
75.00
35.00
80,00
120.00
65,00
55,00
90,00
100,00
103,55
90.00
100.00
100.00
80.00
120.00
800.00
80.00
180.00
100.00
80.00
100.00
60-, 00
100,00
140.00
100.00
80.00
120.00
152,14
188.77
YU
110.00
150.00
140.00
145,00
14Q.OO
1160.00
100.00
190.00
160.00
100,00
135,00
80,00
150,00
160.00
142.50
110.00
160.00
208,57
275.38
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0,0
0.0
0.0
0,0
0.0
DISABILITY
YL *
50.00
4Q.OO
40.00
55.00
3Q.OO
340,00
40,00
90.00
25.00
40.00
40.00
20.00
30 o 0-0
25.00
40.00
30.00
50.00
61,79
81.91
70,00
80.00
80.00
TJ.OO
50.00
400.00
60,00
120,00
60.00
60,00
65,00
40.00
50,00
50.00
62.50
50.00
80.00
89.86
91.36
YU
80.00
120*00
120.00
100.00
70.00
560.00
80.00
160.00 .
100..00
80.00
95.00
60,00
100.00
75.00
97.50
80.00
120.00
128,57
126.77
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
20
0
0
• 0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.*
5.3
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.
0
Q
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
o.o
0.0
DISCOMFORT
YL x
20.00
30.00
40.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
20.00
5.00
5.00
20.00
15.00
10.00
5.00
5.00
17.50
5,00
20,00
16.79
11.03
30.00
50.00
60.00
25,00
30,00
60.00
40.00
15.00
40.00
40.00
35.00
20.00
10.00
25.00
32.50
25.00
40.00
34.29
15.30
YU
40,00
70*00
100.00
60.00
40.00
85.00
60,00
35.00
75*00
60*00
60.00
40,00
20.00
55.00
60.00
40.00
70.00
57.14
21.28
T
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
O.rt
0.0
0.0
0.0
O.n
a
o
0
0
n
n
0
n
n
n
0
n
"
0
n
o..-,
n.n
0.0
O.n
O.n
-------
CALIF ARR
POLLUTANT CODE * 3
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE « 3
'**
• ,'•
PER CF.NT OF POP AFFECTED a 10
PAQC 128
POLLUTANT • CARBON MONOXIDE
CATEGORY » OLD AGE
ROUND
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
:12
13
1*
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST QUAR
THIRD QUAR
ARITH MEAN
STANDARD OEV
INCAPACITY
. YL x
165.00
100.00
120.00
160.00
350.00
600,00
120.00
160.00
120.00
*00.00
140.00
110.00
100.00
160.00
150,00
120.00
165.00
200.36
1*6.61
180*00
175.00
100.00
190.00
550.00
1000.00
1*0.00
200.00
160.00
500.00
180.00
130,00
150.00
190.00
180,00
150.00
200.00
27*. 64
. 2*7.87
YU
200*00
250.00
200,00
210.00
750.00
1*00.00
160.00
2*0.00
200.00
600.00
210.00
165,00
250.00
210.00
210.00
200.00
250.00
360.36
3*5.55
T
24
10
20
24
2*
24
2*
20
12
30
20
24
18
10
t
22.0
18.0
24.0
20,3
6.0
R
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0,0
0,0
0.0
DISABILITY
YL X
130*00
100.00
100.00
90.00
150.00
300,00
100.00
140.00
100.00
1*0.00
110.00
80,00
150.00
95.00
105.00
100.00
140.00
127.50
54.87
150.00
150.00
1*0,00
130,00
250.00
500,00
120,00
170,00
1*0,00
160,00
140.00
lOU.oO
100,00
120.00
140.00
129.00
160.00
169.29
102*02
YU
iTfl.OO
200.00
IPO, 00
165,00
350.00
700.00
1*0.00
200.00
180.00
200.00
160.00
127.00
150.00
160.00
175.00
160.00
200.00
220.1*
1*7.90
T
18
3
8
16
2*
12
20
10
8
• 30
15
12
8
16
13.5
8.0
18.0
14.4
6.9
R
0
0
0
0
o-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0 ••
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISCOMFORT
YL ' x
65.00
50,00
60.00
42.00
30.00
50,0.0
80,00
30,00
50,00
40.00
70,00
60.00
20.00
50,00
50,00
40,00
60,00
49.79
16.61
80*00
100.00
100.00
70.00
40.00
80.00
100*00
50.00
80.00
60.00
95.00
75,00
30.00
80.00
80.00
60.00
95.00
74,29
22.35
YU
100*00
150.00
140.00
100.00
60.00
110.00
120.00
75. PO
120.00
100.00
130.00
100.00
50.00
110.00
105.00
100.00
120.00
104.64
28.3?
T w
l£ 0
s o
4 0
1C • o
!<>
(*
1
1,-,
-.
2- o
10 n
12 *
4 0
10 0
io.o o.o
6.0 0.0
12.0 O.o
9.9 0,0
b . o 0.0
-------
AR9
PAOE
POLLUTANT CODE • 3
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE • 3
T
PER CENT OF POP AFFECTED n 50
POLLUTANT » CARBON
CATEGORY « OLD AGE
POUND
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
;i2
13
. 1*
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST QUAR
THISD QUA5
ARITH MEAN
STANDARD OEV
INCAPACITY
YL X
200.00
150,00
100.00
170.00
:450,00
720.00
160.00
250.00
100.00
600.00
165.00
uo.oo
200.00
170.00
170,00
150,00
250.00
255.36
192, 80
220.00
230.00
200.00
200.00
650.00
1200.00
180.00
300.00
200.00
700.00
200.00
i£o.oo
250tOO
200,00
210.00
200.00
300.00
3*9.29
2^8.24
YU
2*0.00
310.00
300,00
250.00
650,00
1680,00
200,00
350.00
350.00
floo.oo
235.00
185,00
300.00
230.00
300.00
235.00
350.00
448.57
*10«57
T
2*
10
20
2*
24
24
2*
20
12
30
20
2*
18
10
22.0
18.0
24.0
20.3
6.0
R
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISABILITY
YL *
160,00
125.00
90,00
125.00
125.00
360.00
1*0.00
160.00 .
85.00
1*0,00
120.00
100.00
120.00
110.00
125,00
110.00
140.00
1*0.00
67.20
iBu.QO
175.00
180,00
1*5.00
350.00
600.00
16U.OO
180.00
120.00
180.00
1*0.00
120.00
150.00
150.00
167.50
1*5.00
18C.OO
20?.14
127.31
YU
200.00 '
280.00
270.00
165.00
550,00
•8*0.00
180.00
200.00
IPO. 00
200,00
180.00
1*0.00
idO.OO
200.00
200.00
180.00
270.00
268.93
192.81
T
18
5
6
15
12
12
2*
10
6
2*
2*
6
a
16
12.0
6,0
18.0
13.3
7.1
R
0
0"
0.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
o.o
DISCOMFORT
YL x
Bo. 00
100.00
60.00
72.00
. ' 30.00
70.00
120.00
25.00
70.00
60.00
90.00
60.00
30.00
70.00
71.00
60. CO
eo.oo
69,79
26.93
100*00
150.00
120.00
100.00
45.00
120.00
1*0.00
50.00
107.00
100.00
120.00
100.00
50,00
110.00
103,50
100.00
120.00
100.86
32.18
YU
120. OC
200.00
160.00
138.00
70.00
170.00
160.00
65.00
1*7,00
120,00
180,00
125.00
80.00
1*0.00
139.00
120.00
160.00
133.93
40.75
T
12
3
6
12
12
6
12
10
8
2*
10
12
4
10
10.0
6.0
12.0
10.2
4.9
0
n
. 0
n
n
n
n
0
n
n
' n
n
0
n
n
o.n
O.n
O.n
O.n
O.n
-------
CAL1P ARfl
PAOE
POLLUTANT CODE • 3
POLLUTANT • CARBON MONOXIDE
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE « 3
j*
PER CENT OF POP AFFECTED « 90
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
e
9
10
11
:i2
13
14
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST QUAR
THIRD OUAR
ARITH MEAN
STANDARD OEV
INCAPACITY
YL x
230.00
200.00
200.00
175.00
550.00
84Q.OO
180.00
330.00
200.00
700,00
200.00
160.00
250.00
200.00
200.00
200.00
330.00
315.36
218.16
250.00
300.00
300.00
250.00
750.00
14QQ.OO
200.00
400.00
300.00
800.00
23Q.OO
180.00
*
300.00
220*00
300*00
230.00
400.00
420.00
340.99
YU
280.00
AOO.OO
AOO.OO
300.00
950.00
1960.00
220.00
450.00
400.00
900.00
260.00
200.00
350,00
240.00
375.00
260.00
450,00
522.1*
474.28
T
2*
10
20
2*
2*
2*
24
20
12
30
20
2*
18
10
22.0
18.0
24,0
20.3
6.0
CATEGORY a OLD AGE
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
.0.0
0.0
0.0
DISABILITY
YL *
160.00
175.00
100,00
150,00
250,00
420.00
160.00
170.00
175.00
600.00
175.00
110.00
150.00
150.00
165.00
150.00
175.00
210.36
136.15
180,00
275.00
200,00
200.00
400.00
700.00
180.00
200.00
20U.OO
700.00
200,00
130.00
200,00
180.00
200.00
180.00
275.00
281,79
187.72
ROUND »
YU
200.00
375.00
300.00
275.00
550.00
980.00
200.00
230.00
250.00
800.00
225,00
152.00
250.00
210.00
25Q.OO
210.00
375,00
356.93
248.27
2
T
18
3
10
18
24
12
20
10
8
• 30
15
12
8
16
13.5
10.0
18.0
14.7
6.9
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISCOMFORT
YL x
130.00
150.00
50,00
115.00
30.00
95,00
140.00
25,00
80.00
60.00
130.00
87.00
60.00
100.00
91.00
60.00
130.00
89.43
40.55
150.00
200.00
100,00
140.00
50.00
160.00
160.00
50.00
120.00
100.00
160.00
105,00
100.00
140.00
130,00
100.00
160,00
123.93
42.89
YU
170.00
250.00
150.00
175.00
75.00
225,00
180.00
75.00
160.00
140.00
200,00
130.00
140,00
180.00
165,00
140.00
180.00
160.71
49.06
T
12
5
6
12
12
6
12
10
8
24
10
12
4
10
10,0
6,0
12.0
10.2
4.9
V
a
0
0
n
0
n
0
0
n
n
' 0
0
0
n
n
0*0
O.o
0,n
O.o
O.o
-------
CALIF
PA3C 125
POLLUTANT CODE • 3
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE
. i"
PER CENT OF POP aFFECTED
POLLUTANT * C-ARBON MONOXIDE
CATEGORY « HEART CONDI MILD
ROUND « 2
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
:i2
13
1*
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST auAfl
THIRD QUAR
ARITH KEAN
STANDARD DEV
INCAPACITY
YL x
60>00
50.00
60.00
43.00
: 30.00
180.00
80.00
75.00
40.00
20.00
55.00
40.00
30.00
50.00
50.00
40.00
60.00
58.00
38.95
70*00
100.00
100.00
75.00
50.00
200.00
120.00
110.00
80.00
40.00
75.00
40.00
50 . 00
80.00
77.50
60*00
100.00
86.43
4Q.26
YU
90.00
150.00 -
140.00
105.00
80.00
320.00
140.00
150.00
140,00
60.00
100.00
85.00
80 .00
120.00
112.50
85.00
140.00
125.71
63.30
T
0,
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
R
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISABILITY
YL *
40.00
40.00
40.00
35.00
30.00
150.00
60.00
55.00
20,00
10.00
20.00
23,00
10.00
30.00
32.50
20.00
40.00
40.21
34.9Q
50.00
80.00
80.00
Sp.OO
50.00
180.00
80.00
75.00
60.00
20.00
40.00
40,00
10,00
50.00
SO. 00
*u.oo
80.00-
61.79
40.27
YU
70.00
120.00
120.00
^0.00
75.00
210.00
100.00
115.00
100.00
30.00
60.00
65.00
30.00
60.00
85.00
65.00
115.00
90.36
45.13
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
o.o
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0,0
0.0
0.0
0.0
O'O
DISCOMFORT
YL x
21.00
30.00
22.00
10.00
20.00
50.00
40.00
10.00
5,00
10.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
10.00
10.00
5.00
22.00
17.36
14.16
30.00
60.00
60.00
35.00
30.00
80.00
60.00
25.00
40.00
20.00
10.00
20.00
10.00
25.00
30.00
20.00
60.00
36.07
21.23
YU
50.00 '
90.00
100.00
50.00
40.00
110.00
80.00
40.00
80.00
25.00
35.00
40,00
20.00
60.00
50.00
*0.00
80.00
58.57
28.58
T
' 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
o.o
»
.-• a
0 ,
0
0
0
0
n
n
0
0
' 0
0
0
0
0
O.fl
0.0
O.o
O.o
O'O
-------
CALIF AHH
POLLUTANT CODE « 3
POLLUTANT = CARBON MONOXIDE
PAOF 116
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE « 4
. r
PER CENT OF POP AFFECTED • 10
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
:i2
13
1*
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST QUAR
THIRD QUAR
ARITM MEAN
STANOARP OEV
INCAPACITY
YL X
130«00
100.00
120.00
170.00
,.200.00
240.00
150.00
100.00
120.00
160.00
120.00
100,00
130.00
UO.OO
130.00
120.00
160.00
141.43
40.36
l5o«00
150.00
160.00
180.00
300.00
350.00
190.00
130.00
160.00
180,00
140.00
HO, 00
160.00
170.00
160,00
150,00
180.00
182,86
63.30
YU
170.00
200.00
200.00
190.00
600.00
490.00
24Q.OO
190.00
200,00
200.00
160.00
180,00
190,00
200.00
200.00
190.00
200.00
243.57
130.77
T
2*
10
12
30
24
12
20
10
12
24
12
24
12
5
12.0
12.0
24.0
16.5
7.5
CATEGORY « HEART COND»
R
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISABILITY
YL *
lOO'OO
75.00
80.00
70.00
150.00
180,00
100.00
80.00
78,00
80,00
70,00
80.00
7Q.OO
95,00
60.00
75.00
100.00
93.43
32.50
120.00
140.00
120.00
125,00
250.00
300,00
120.00
135.00
120.00
100.00
105.00
98.00
10o>00
125.00
120.00
105.00
136.00
139.86
5*. 46
MILD
ROUND «
YU
1*0*00
180,00
160.00
165.00
350.00
*?0.00
1*0.00
170.00
170.00
1*0,00
135.00
130.00
150.00
155.00
157.50
140.00
170.00
186.07
86.67
i 2
T
18
5
8
2*
2*
2*
20
10
12
2*
15
2*
12
16
17.0
12.0
24,0
16.9
6.7
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.
0
0
0
0
0.0
0,0
0.0
0.0
o.o
DISCOMFORT
YL x
60.00
50.00
60.00
55.00
30.00
60.00
80.00
30,00
40.00
*0,00
50.00
50.00
20.00
5S.OO'
50.00
40.00
60.00
48.57
15.50
7o«00
100.00
100.00
65,00
45.00
100.00
100.00
45.00
80.00
60.00
75.00
70.00
30.00
75.00
72,50
60.00
100,00
72,50
22.60
YU
9o«00
150.00
1*0.00
100.00
60.00
1*0.00
120.00
65.00
120.00
80.00 .
110.00
100.00
50.00
105.00
102.50
80.00
120.00
102.1*
30.87
T
12
5
4
18
12
6
12
8
12
18
10
12
6
10
ii.o
6,0
12.0
10.4
*.3
R
n
. ft
0
0
n
n
o
0
n
' 0
n
n
n
(V
0,0
0.0
0,n
0.0
O.n
-------
CALIF AHH
127
POLLUTANT CODE « 3
POLLUTANT a CARSON MONOXIDE
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE « A
<*
PER CENT OF POP* AFFECTED a 50 '
INCAPACITY
DOCTOR YL X YU
z
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
'12
13
1*
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST QUAR
THIRD ouiR
ARITH MEAN
STANDARD HEV
160,00
150.00
150.00
190.00
: 300.00
275.00
150,00
120.00
160.00
160.00
uo.oo
120,00
120.00
180.00
155,00
140.00
lao.oo
169,6*
54.29
180.00
200.00
200.00
220.00
400.00
450.00
200.00
150.00
180.00
180.00
160.00
UO.OO
160.00
200.00
190.00
160.00
200.00
215.71
91.96
200,00
250.00
300.00
260,00
65n,00
550,00
250.00
190.00
200.00
400.00
180.00
170,00
210,00
210,00
230,00
200.00
300.00
287.14
146.47
T
2*
10
12
30
6
12
20
10
12
24
24
24
6
5
12,0
10,0
24.0
15,6
8.4
CATEGORY • HEART CONDI MILD
ROUND s
DISABILITY
R YL * YU
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0,0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
120,00
100.00
120.00
120.00
200.00
150.00
120,00
100.00
105.00
140.00
120.00
95,00
100.00
115.00
120.00
100.00
120.00
121.79
27.36
1*0,00
150,00
160.00
150.00
300,00 „
350,00
140.00
130.00
140.00
160,00
145.00
118,00
15Q.OO
150.00
150.00
140.00
160.00
1^0.21
67.21
160.00
200.00
200,00
IflO.OO
450.00
500.00
160.00
160.00
190.00
IfiO.OO
IPO. 00
145.00
20P.OO
195.00
1H5.00
160.00
200.00
221.43
109.27
S 2
T
18
5
10
2*
2*
2*
20
10
12
24
15
24
12
16
17.0
12.0
24.0
17.0
6.5
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o-
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISCOMFORT
YL x
90.00
80.00
60.00
60.00
30.00
85.00
100.00
35.00
80.00
60.00
90.00
75.00
30,00
BO. 00
80,00
60.00
85.00
69.64
23.16
110.00
160*00
120.00
100.00
50.00
140.00
120,00
50.00
110.00
100.00
115.00
93,00
50.00
110.00
110.00
93,00
120.00
102.00
32.84
YU
130.00
220.00
160.00
1*0.00
70.00
195.00
140.00
65.00
160.00
140.00
145.00
120.00
80.00
140.00
140.00
120.00
160.00
136.07
43.55
T
12
5
6
18
12
6
12
9
12
18
10
12
6
10
11.0
6.0
12.0
10.6
4.1
e
a
n
0
n
n
n
0
n
n
n
• n
n
n
n
rt
O.n
O.n
O.n
0.0
O.n
-------
CALIF
POLLUTANT CODE o 3
POPULATION CATEGORY COOE = 4
PER CENT OF POP AFFECTED a 90
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
' 10'
11
•12
13
1*
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST OUAP
THIRD QUAR
ARITn MEAN
STiNOABr; OEV
INCAPACITY
YL x
180.00
200.00
200.00
200.00
400.00
300.00
160.00
120.00
170,00
160.00
170,00
1*0.00
160.00
190,00
175,00
160.00
200.00
156.43
71.75
200.00
250.00
300.00
2*0.00
600.00
500.00
220.00
160.00
200.00
180.00
200.00
160.00
*
220.00
210.00
215.00
200. OC
250.00
?60.00
129.56
YU
220.00
300.00
*00.00
280,00
800.00
700.00
280,00
200.00
230.00
200.00
230.00
200.00
28Q.OO
230.00
255,00
220.00
300.00
325.00
188,83
T
2*
10
20
36
24
24
2*
15
12
2*
20
2*
18
3
22.0
15.0
24.0
19,9
8,0
POLLUTANT " CARBON MONOXIDE
CATEGORY a HEART CONDI *ILO
ROUND i
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0,0
o.o
0,0
0.0
0,0
DISABILITY
YL *
15Q.OO
150.00
100,00
1*5.00
250.00
200.00
1*0.00
115.00
120.00
1*0.00
135.00
110.00
1*5,00
1 55 . 0-0
1*2.50
120.00
150.00
1*6,79
38.31
I7u.o0
200.00
200.00
167.00
400.00
400.00
16U.OO
135.00
160.00
160,00
170.00
135.00
200.00
180.00
1^0.00
160.00
200.00
202.6*
86.13
YU
190.00
250.00
300.00
"95.00
550.00
600.00
180.00
1R5.00
200.00
180.00
200.00
160,00
250.00
205.00
200.00
185.00
250.00
260,36
138.47
» 2
T
18
5
10
2*
2*
12
2*
10
12
2*
15
2*
12
16
15.5
12.0
2*.0
16,4
6.6
R
0
0
0
0
0.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0.
0.0
0.0
0,0
0.0
DISCOMFORT
YL ' x
100,00
100.00
80.00
70,00
30,00
110.00
120.00
35.00
85.00
60.00
115.00
100.00
60.00
100.00
92.50
60.00
100.00
83.21
28.60
110.00
180.00
120.00
110.00
50.00
180.00
1*0.00
60.00
120.00
80.00
145.00
118.00
100.00
140cOQ
119.00
100.00
140.00
118.07
38.51
YU
130.00
240.00
160,00
160.00
70.00
250,00
160.00
80.00
160.00
120.00
180.00
1*5,00
1*0.00
180,00
160,00
130.00
180.00
155.36
50.09
T
12
5
6
18
12
6
12
10
12
13
10
12
6
10
11.0
6.0
12.0
10,6
*.l
R
0
n
n
n
n
0
n
0
0
' 0
n
0
n
n
0«n
O.n
0,n
O.n
O.n
-------
CALIF
129
POLLUTANT CODE • 3
POLLUTANT «> CARBON MONOXIDE
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE <• 5 CATEGI
i'
PER CENT OF POP AFFECTED « 0
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST OUAR
TH.JRC QUAP
ARITH M£AN
STANDARD CEV
INCAPACITY
YL X
42.00
80.00
40.00
40.00
:30.00
50.00
90.00
30.00
20,00
60.00
65.00
35.00
30.00
0.00
40.00
30,00
60.00
43.71
23.30
60,00
100.00.
60.00
55.00
50.00
80.00
100.00
60.00
60.00
90.00
80.00
48.00
50.00
20,00
60.00
50.00
80.00
64,50
?1«64
YU
80.00
120.00
80.00
70.00
70.00
110.00
110.00
130.00
100,00
100.00
100.00
75.00
80.00
40.00
90.00
75.00
110.00
90.36
23.90
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0,0
0,0
. 0,0
R
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0,0
0,0
0.0
DRY » HEAl
*T COND.
DISABILITY
YL *
30.00
60.00
30.00
20.00
30,00
35.00
80,00
35.00
15.00
4Q.OO
40.00
18,00
10.00
0.00
30.00
18.00
40.00
31,64
20.35
4
-------
PAOE no
POLLUTANT • CARBON MONOXIDE
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE
("
PER CENT OF POP AFFECTED
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
::i2
13
14
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST QUAR
THIPD QUAR
ARITH MEAN
STANDARD DEV
INCAPACITY
YL " x
80.00
100.00
60.00
58.00
150.00
60,00
150.00
80.00
60.00
80.00
95,00
60,00
70.00
30 . 00
75,00
60.00
95.00
80.93
34.03
100.00
150.00
100.00
100.00
300.00
100.00
160.00
130.00
100.00
100.00
130.00
84,00
*
100.00
6-0.00
100.00
100.00
130.00
122, *3
57.32
" 5
• 10
YU
120.00
200.00
142.00
142.00
*50.00
140.00
17Q.OO
170.00
160.00
120.00
160.00
110,00
150.00
90.0-0
146.00
120.00
170.00
166,00
86.44
T
2*
10
20
36
24
48
30
14
12
24
20
24
18
8
22.0
14.0
24.0
22.3
10.7
CATEG
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
ORY a HEA
RT CONDt
DISABILITY
YL *
60.00
80.00
42.00
55.00
100.00
50.00
1*0.00
65.00
38.00
60.00
65.00
45.00
15.00
25 . 0 0
57.50
*2.00
65.00
60.00
31.45
80.00
120.00
70.00
8^.00
200.00
80.00
150.00
110.00
80.00
80,00
95,00
62,00
2^.00
4-5 . 00
80.00
70.00
110.00
91.36
43.76
SEV
ROUND •
YU
100.00
160.00
100.00
iro.oo
300.00
110.00
160.00
155.00
140.00
100.00
130.00
90.00
40.00
75.00
115.00
100.00
155.00
127.14
60.28
2
T
18
5
8
. 2*
2*
24
2*
14
12
2*
15
2*
12
16
17.0
12.0
24.0
17.4
6.7
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISCOMFORT
YL x
40.00
60.00
30,00
30.00
30.00
35.00
l3o.OO
15.00
20.00
40.00
25.00
30.00
10.00
10.00
30.00
20.00
40.00
36.07
30.08
50.00
100.00
50.00
60.00
40.00
60.00
140.00
30.00
60.00
60.00
60.00
45.00
20.00
30.00
55.00
40.00
60.00
57.50
30.56
YU
68.00
140.00
30.00
82.00
60.00
«5.00
iSo.oo
55.00
1 2 •" . 0 0
*•-< .no
IOC. 00
6?, 00
*0.00
. 50 . fl-0-
80,00
6C.15
1 o : . i o
8:.'i
21.20
«r
T R
12 0
5 0
u n
19 n
12 0
H 0
:? o
ft 0
\? ' n
i* '0
10 « n
12 0
c n
-:o o
'.2.'- O.n
6.0 o.n
i 2 . o O.n
11.1 o.n
5.0 O.n
-------
CALl? AR3
PAOI 131
POLLUTANT CODS • 3
POLLUTANT • CARBON
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE a 5
t°
PER CENT OF POP' AFFECTED » 50
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
: ;i2
13
1*
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST QUAR
THIOO GUAR
ARITH MEAN
STANDARD CEV
INCAPACITY
YL x
130.00
140,00
200.00
130.00
200.00
103.00
160.00
140.00
85.00
145.00
200,00
80,00
120.00
70.0-0
135.00
108,00
160.00
136.29
43.13
l5o.OO
180.00
250.00
162.00
350.00
130.00
180.00
180.00
140,00
180,00
240.00
120.00
«
200.00
100.00
180.00
150,00
300.00
186.57
62.03
YU
170.00
220.00
300.00
210.00
500.00
252.00
200.00
230.00
160,00
*00.00
280.00
140.00
280.00
140.00
225,00
l7fl.CO
280,00
248.71
101.29
T
2*
10
12
40
24
24
24
15
12
24
24
48
24
12
24,0
12.0
24.0
22.6
10.8
CATEGORY « HEART COND»
R
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISABILITY
YL *
95.00
130.00
60,00
78.00
150.00
85,00
150.00
100.00
60.00
80.00
100.00
68.00
100.00
60.0-0
90.00
68.00
100.00
94.00
30.«3
11^.00
170,00
100.00
105.00
300.00
1*0.00
160.00
150.00
100.00
100.00
135.00
90.00
15
-------
CALIF
POLLUTANT CODE » 3
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE « 5
1'
PER CFNT OF POP'AFFECTED » 90
132
POLLUTANT • CARBON MONOXIDE
CATEGORY • HEART COND* SEV
ROUNO » 2
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
6
9
'lO-
ll
. 12
13
1*
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST QUAR
THIRD QUAR
ARITH H£AN
STANDARD DEV
INCAPACITY
YL x
165.00
180,00
1 000.00
140.00
100,00
' 150,00
250.00
60.00
120.00
160.00
140.00
150.00
60,00
100=00
145.00
100.00
165.00
199.64
23=.07
180.00
230.00
1250.00
175.00
400.00
250.00
300.00
170.00
160,00
200.00
160.00
200.00
*
120.00
150.00
190.00
160.00
250.00
281.79
287.73
YU
200.00
280.00
1500.00
210.00
550.00
350.00
350.00
250.00
200.00
300.00
180.00
2*0.00
180.00
2-0-0 ...00
245.00
200.00
350,00
356,43
343.77
T
2*
10
12
*0
12
24
2*
4
4
2*
24
48
2*
12
24.0
12.0
24.0
20. A
12.7
R
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISABILITY
YL X
13Q.OO
150.00
500.00
95.00
100.00
108.00
15Q.OO
70.00
60.00
120.00
120.00
110.00
50.00
100.00
109.00
95,00
130.00
133.07
109.75
iSu.oO
200,00
650.00
115.00
200.00
180.00
200.00
150.00
100.00
160.00
140.00
150,00
100.00
150.00
150.00
140.00
200.00
188,93
13?. 89
YU
175.00
250.00
800.00
178,00
500.00
252.00
250.00
210.00
1*0.00
200.00
160.00
200.00
150.00
200.00
200.00
175.00
250.00
26J.79
178.28
T
18
5
6
40
6
24
2*
4
12
2*
2*
46
2*
12
21.0
6.0
24.0
19.4
13.2
R
0 .
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISCOMFORT
YL x
SQ.OO
100,00
40.00
70,00
30.00
85.00
127.00
30,00
60.00
40,00
100.00
60.00
40.00
70.00
65.00
«0.00
65.00
66.57
29.50
9Q.OO
150.00
80.00
90.00
50.00
1*0.00
1*0.00
50.00
100.00
60.00
135.00
80,00
80.00
90.00
90,00
80.00
135,00
95,36
33,65
YU
' 110.00
200.00
120.00
120.00
70.00
195.00
150.00
70.00
1*0.00
80,00
165.00
100.00
120.00
120.00
120.00
100.00
150,00
125.71
41.13
T
12
5
6
18
12
8
10
a
12
18
10
12
6
20
11.0
8.0
12.0
11.2
4.7
ff
ft
n
n
0
0
0
0
n
n
0
o
n
n
n
O.n
O.n
O.o
O.n
O.o
-------
CALIF A.RH
POLLUTANT CODE « 3
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE » 6
<'
PER CENT OF POP AFFECTED « 0
PAOE 133
POLLUTANT • CARBON MONOXIDE
CATEGORY « HAY FEVER* SINUS
ROUND • 2
OOC'OR
2
3
' 4
5
7
B
9
. 10
11
12
13
14
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST QUAR
THI'PO OUAP
4RITM MEAN
STANDARD DEV
INCAPACITY
YL x
80.00
100.00
60.00
65.00
100.00
• 440.00
60.00
95.00
53.00
40.00
60.00
38.00
80.00
70.00
67,50
60.00
95.00
96d4
100,90
100.00
125.00
100.0.0
95.00
150.00
BOO. 00
80.00
165,00
90.00
60.00
95.00
60.00
1DO.OO
90.00
97.50
90.00
125,00
150-71
189,17
YU
120.00
150.00
14Q.OO
142.00
180.00
1160.00
100.00
200.00
130.00
80,00
125.00
81.00
150.00
120.00
135.00
120.00
150,00
205.57
276.71
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
o.o
0.0
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.6
0.0
DISABILITY
YL X
40.00
75.00
40.00
50.00
30.00
340.00
40.00
20.00
3Q.OO
20.00
30.00
20.00
30.00
30.00
3Q.OO
30.00
40.00
56.79
82.78
60.00
100.00
80.00
80.00
50.00
400.00
60.00
65.00
60.00
*0.00
60.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
60.00
50.00
80.00
86, o7
91.78
YU
80.00
125.00
120.00
115.00
70.00
560.00
80,00
105.00
100.00
60.00
100.00
60.00
100.00
90.00
100.00
fin. 00
115.00
126.Q7
126.60
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
o.o
0«0
0.0
DISCOMFORT
YL x
22,00
30.00
20.00
28.00
30.00
50,00
20.00
5,00
5.00
20.00
5.00
10.00
5.00
10.00
20.00
5.00
28,00
18.57
13.12
30.00
50.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
80.00
40.00
25.00
40.00
40.00
20.00
20.00
10.00
30.00
40.00
25.00
50.00
38.21
18.15
YU
50.00
70.00
100.00
87.00
70,00
110.00
60.00
35.00
80.00
60.00
40.00
40.00
20.00
60.00
60.00
40.00
80,00
63.00
25.46
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
n
- 0
fl
0
0
0
o.o
0.0
0.0
0.0
O.n
e»
f)
0
n
n
n
n
n
n.
0
n
n
n
n
n
O.n
O.n
O.n
O.n
i.'.O
-------
CALl" APR
POLLUUNT CODE « ?
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE » 6
«'
PER CENT OF POP'AFFECTED » 10
PA3E 134
POLLUTANT » CARBON MONOXIDE
CATEGORY • HAY FEVER* SINUS
ROUND • 2
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10 .
11
12
13
14
15
16
MEDIftN
FIRST QUAR
THlbO QUAR
AR1TH MEAVi
STANDARD DEV
INCAPACITY
YL x
130*00
130.00
100.00
210.00
400.00
•'600.00
140.00
270.00
100.00
400.00
135.00
107,00
100.00
160,00
137.50
10^.00
270.00
213.00
152.04
160»00
160.00
200.00
250.00
600.00
1000.00
160.00
300.00
150.00
500.00
160.00
127,00
15*0.00
180.00
170.00
160.00
300.00
?92.64
2*7.99
YU
19Q.OO
180.00
400.00
275.00
800.00
1400.00
• lSo.00
330.00
200.00
600.00
200.00
160.00
250.00
' 200.00
225.00
190.00
400.00
383.21
346.14
T
24
10
20
24
24
24
24
13
12
24
20
24
18
10
22.0
13,0
24.0
19.4
5.7
R
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISABILITY
YL ' X
110-00
100.00
120.00
110.00
200.00
300.00
120.00
70.00
30.00
Ho.OO
100.00
79.00
?o.oo
110.00
110.00
80.00
120.00
122.07
61.09
l3y.oo
125.00
160.00
1*0.00
300.00
500.00
140.00
100.00
120.00
160.00
125.00
100,00
10U.OO
130.00
130.00
120.00
160.00
166.43
10*. 16
YU
160*00
150.00
200.00
170.00
400.00
700.00
160.00
140.00
165.00
200.00
160,00
125.00
150.00
160.00
160,00
150.00
200.00
217,14
154.08
T
18
5
8
16
2*
12
18
12
8
•24
15
12
8
10
12.0
8.0
18.0
13.6
5.9
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0,0
0,0
0.0
0.0
DISCOMFORT
YL x
60.00
75,00
70.00
50.00
30.00
60,00
100.00
20.00
40.00
40.00
70,00
60.00
20.00
60.00
60.00
40,00
70.00
53.93
22.38
80.00
100,00
100.00
70.00
40.00
100.00
120.00
40.00
80.00
60.00
90.00
75,00
30.00
80.00
80.00
60.00
100.00
76.07
26.18
YU
100*00
125.00
130.00
107.00
70.00
140,00
140,00
65.00
125.00
80.00
120.00
100.00
50,00
110.00
108,50
80.00
125.00
104.43
28.62
T
12
5
4
10
12
6
12
10
8
18
10
12
4
10
10.0
6.0
12.0
9.5
3.9
-------
PAflC
CALIF ARB
POLLUTANT CODE • 3
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE « 6
PER CENT OF POP' AFFECTED . 50
2
3
A
5
7
' 8.
9
10
11
12
13
1*'
15
16
INCAPACITY
YL
YU
FIRST
THIRD QUAR
AHIT* M£4N
STiNiD&RC OEV
POLLUTANT a CARBON MONOXIDF
CATEGORY » HAY FEVER» SINUS
ROUND
190.00 220.00 2*0.00
150.00 250.00 . 350.00
200.00 300.00 500.00
250.00 275.00 300.00
500.00 700.00 900.00
720.00 1200.00 1680.00
160.00 180.00 200.00
260.00 300.00 360.00
120.00 ISO.00 300.00
600.00 700.00 800.00
170.00 200.00 230.00
135,00 1^0.00 185.00
.2 0-0 ...0.0 2.50.00 300.00
180.00 200.00 22^,00
195.00 250.00 300.00
160.00 ?00.00 230.00
260.00 300.00 500.00
273.93 365.36 468.93
189.35 297.51 *11.29
DISCOMFORT
V
T
2*
10
20
2*
2*
2*
2*
14
12
24
20
24
18
10
DISA8IL
R YL
0 iSQ.OO
0 100.00
0 120.00
0 130.00
0 150.00
0 360.00
o 1*0.00
0 70.00
0 80.00
0 150.00
0 120.00
0 90.00
0 120.00
0 160.00
I I T
A,
l7u.OO
200,00
160.00
190.00
400.00
600.00
160.00
90.00
1*0.00
180.00
140.00
110.00
150,00
180.00
YU
190.00
300.00
200.00
20*;. 00
600.00
840.90
180.00
IflO.OO
200,00
?00 .00
170.00
130.00
IPO. 00
200.00
T
12
5
6
12
12
12
12
12
6
24
2*
12
8
4
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
YL
100.00 120.00
eo.oo 150.00
80.00 120.00
80.00 110.00
30.00 50.00
65.00 1*0.00
120.00 1*0.00
30.00 45.00
B5.00 130,00
80.00 100,00
100.00 135.00
BO.00 100.00
30.00 50.00
9-0.00 110.00
YU
l*o«oc
250.00
160, on
135. on
80.00
195.00
I6o.no
85.no
I70.no
120.00
165. on
125,00
ao.no
140.00
T «
12 »
5 •«
6 0
12 «
12 "
6 0
12 »
10 n
8 0
18 0
10 "
12 «
4 0
20 n
22.0 0,0 125.00
14.0 0.0 100.00
24.0 0.0 150.00
19.* 0.0 138.57
5.6 0.0 69'6°
165,00 200.00 12,0
14Q.OO 180.00 *>.0
190,00 200.00 l2.°
20^.00 269.29 11.5
13*.32 199.90 6.1
o.o .
0.0
0.0
Oc0
0.0.
80.00 115.00 1*0.00
80.00 100.00 120.00
90.00 135.00 165.no
76.43 107.1* 1*3-21
27.56 35.23 *«"5*
11.0 0.0
6,0 o«n
12.0 O.o
10.5 0.0
4.6 O.n
-------
CALIF AR8
PAOE
13ft
POLLUTANT CODE • 3
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
:i2
13
1*
15
16
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE » 6
'V
PER CE.KT OF POP'AFFECTED » 90
FISST
THIRD QUAR
ARITH MEAN
STANDARD DEV
INCAPACITY
X
YU
250tOO 300.00
350.00 450.00
350.00 400.00
300,00 350.00
POLLUTANT « CARSON MONOXIDE
CATEGORY » HAY FEVER* SINUS
ROUND * 2
DISABILITY
YL
200,00
250.00
250.00
200.00
600.00 800.00 1000.00
840.00 1400.00 1960.00
200,00 250,00 300,00
350.00 4QO.OO 450.00
200,00 300.00 400.00
800.00 900.00 1200.00
220.00 250,00 290.00
160.00 lflq.00 220.00
250.00 300.00 350.00
210.00 230.00 250.00
235,00 300,00 375.00 22,0 0.0
200.00 2=0.00 3QO.OO 1*.0
350.00 400.00 450.00 J4.0 0.0
337.36 447,14 565.00 19.4 0.0
231.32 346.26 492.33 5,6 0.0
DISCOMFORT
T
24
10
20
24
24
24
24
14
12
24
20
24
18
10
1,0
l.O
>.o
>.4
>.6
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
YL
180.00
200.00
200.00
175.00
300.00
420.00
180.00
135.00
120.00
160.00
170.00
106,00
lSo.00
160.00
172.50
150.00
200.00
189.71
ao.ss
X
200.00
300.00
250.00
250.00
450.00
700,00
200.00
200.00
180,00
200.00
225.00
130.00
200.00
180.00
200,00
200,00
250.00
261.79
146.86
YU
220.00
400.00
300.00
300.00
600.00
9PO.OO
220.00
2*5.00
300,00
250.00
250.00
160.00
250.00
200.00
257.50
220.00
300,00
335.36
2U.12
T
18
5
10
18
24
12
18
12
8
24
15
12
8
10
12.0
10. 0
18.0
13.9
5.9
R
0
0
0 .
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0,0
YL
120.00
. 150.00
150,00
87.00
10.00
108.00
120.00
30.00
70.00
122.00
120.00
42.00
60,00
130,00
114.00
60.00
122.00
94.21
44.90
X
140.
250.
200,
128.
20.
180.
130.
50.
100.
160.
140.
60,
100.
150.
135.
100.
160.
129.
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
14
61.08
YU
160.00
350. Of,
250.00
157.00
40.00
?50.nn
140. on
70. Of
125. or
193. or.
IhO.On
SO. On
1*0. or,
180.00
156. So
1*5.00
193,00
163,9.3
ao.*. i
T <*
;? n
*> 0
6 0
'•I 0
3 n
*> o
\-> 0
1 0
6 0
'.* ' '0
••4 n
2 n
?. 0
3 o
(• • . 0 0,0
"> . o o t n
• ;,i o.o
* . 0 0.0
' -2 0.0
-------
CALIF AR8
POLLUTANT CODE •' 3
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE = 7
PER CENT OF POP*AFFECTED » 0
PAGE 13T
POLLUTANT « CARBON MONOXIDE
CATEGORY a INFLUENZA
ROUND « 2
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10 '
11
:12
13
14
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST Qt'Ap
THTBO QUAS
ARITH MEAN
STANDARD DEV
INCAPACITY
YL x
80.00
50.00
60.00
65.00
100.00
440.00
60.00
70.00
40,00
40.00
60.00
39,00
80,00
70.00
62.50
50.00
80.00
89.57
102.33
100*00
100.00
100.00
95.00
150.00
800.00
80,00
140.00
80,00
60.00
80.00
59,00
>
100.00
90,00
97,50
80.00
100.00
145,29
190.14
YU
120.00
150.00
142,00
142.00
250.00
1160.00
100.00
190.00
140.00
80.00
120.00
81,00
150.00
110,00
141,00
110.00
150.00
209.64
277.03
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 '
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
o.o
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0,0
0,0
0.0
o.o
0.0
DISABILITY
YL X
50.00
40.00
40.00
So. 00
40.00
240.00
40.00
10.00
5.00
20.00
30,00
20.00
30.00
30.00
35.00
20.00
40.00
46.07
57.45
70,00
80.00
80.00
80.00
60,00
40U.OO
60.00
45.00
40,00
40.00
60.00
39,00
So.OO
50,00
60.00
45,00
80.00
82,43
92.62
YU
100«00
120.00
122.00
115.00
80.00
560.00
80.00
70.00
80.00
60.00
90.00
60.00
100.00
70.00
85.00
70.00
115.00
121.93
127.78
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
• 0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0,0
0.0
R
o
0
0
0
0 .
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
o.o
JISCOMFORT
YL ' x
22.00
30.00
20.00
28.00
20.00
50,00
20.00
5.00
5.00
10.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
20.00
20.00
5,00
22.00
17.50
13.03
40.00
50.00
60.00
50.00
30.00
80.00
40.00
15.00
30.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
10.00
40.00
35.00
20.00
50.00
36.07
19.43
YU T
60*00 0 "
70.00 0 n
100.00 i) *
87.QO "•
40.00 f- ft
110.00 0 ft
60.00
25.00
75.00
40.00
65.00 • •>
40.00
20.00
60,00
60.00 0. ' .
40.00 0.
75.00 0.;
60,86 0. •
26.59 c- .-
-------
CALIF ARB
POLLUTANT CODE E 3
POPULATION CATEGORY COOE «» 7
PER CENT OF POP AFFECTED « 10 •
PAOf. 139
POLLUTANT o CARBON MONOXIDE
CATEGORY * INFLUENZA
ROUND • 2
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10 '
11
:i2
13
14
15
16
MEOI*N
FIRST QUAP
THIRD CUAS
ASITH KEAN
STANDARD OEV
INCAPACITY
YL X
110.00
100.00
60.00
120,00
200.00
600.00
140.00
135.00
80,00
4QO.OO
110.00
95.00
100.00
120.00
115.00
100.00
UO.OO
169.29
149.01
13Q.OO
175.00
120.00
152.00
300.00
1000.00
160.00
ISO. 00
140,00
500.00
UO.OO
120,00
150,00
150.00
151,00
140.00
180.00
244.07
?39.8l
YU
16Q.OO
250.00
180.00
19S.OO
400.00
1400,00
180.00
225.00
198,00
600,00
170,00
150,00
250.00
180,00
198.00
180.00
250.00
324.36
332.28
T
24
10
15
24
24
24
24
14
24
36
20
24
18
10
1
24.0
15.0
24.0
20.8
6.9
R
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
OaO
0.0
0.0
0,0
DISABILITY
YL *
So. 00
100.00
60.00
85,00
75.00
300.00
120.00
50.00
78.00
140.00
80,00
78,00
7Q.OO
90.00
80.00
75.00
100.00
100,43
61.84
lOWtOO
150.00
109,00
120.00
150.00
500,00
HO. oo
80,00
120.00
160,00
110.00
100.00
100.00
120.00
120.00
100.00
150.00
146.
-------
PAOE
CALlf ftRR
pOLLUtlNt CODE • 3
c»TE<30><' • I«"-UEIi ft . no
DISABILITY
T R YL *
24 o 120.00 l*°-°° ]
lo 0 125.00 175.00 1
UI3V,urr «.. . ^y |
Y° ,'. " «.« "*••«« l"-M '" ".
"0-°° , .00.00 ...... »«•«?£•• *
»-« „ , 40.00 ao.oo .ao.oo .-
150-00 *".»« _ n 10Q>00 J50.00 200. Ou - ^ ^ ^^ n2.00 ,,
150.00
250.00
300.00
720.00 ,
iso.oo
270.00
110.00
600.00
165.00
138.00
200.00
180.00
200.00
275.00
500.00
1200*00
200.00
300.00
1^0 .00
700.00
195.00
160.00
250.00
200.00
250.00
300.00
650.00
1680.00
220.00
330,00
300.00 .
800.00
225.00
185.0°
300.00
220.00
ZO u
0 150.00
2* "
24 0 100.00
24 0 390-00
24 0 160-00
.4 o 180.00
!•» u
2.4 0 115'00
36 0 I60'00
,. 0. 130.00
cO "
24 0 ^8.00
18 o 100.00
V40,0°
10 v
22^.00
200.00
600.00
180.00
22U.OO
160.00
180.00
160.00
120.00
15U.OO
160.00
250.00 I8
300.00 2*
810*00 I2
200.00 18
240.00 I2
200.00 I2
200.00 36
195.00 I5
V45.00 12
200.00 8
ISO. 00 1*
, i C
Q W W . *• -
« 30 00
Q J v . « w
0 90.00
0 140.00
0 120.00
n 45.00
0 -T «» . U w
0 80.00
0 85.00
n 68.00
y w w • "
0 30.00
o 100.00
it.n 80.00
40.00
140.00 ,
160.00
170.00
HO. 00
100.00
120*00
90.00
50.00
120.00
105.00
50.00 1'"'
190.00
180.00 !•'
200.00 J •' ° '
130.00 1''
. 120.00 2~
150.00 ln
115.00 1- °
80.00 *
140.00 2'"'
131.00 12.,- <•"'
„,.„
'»••«
„..„ „,...
»••
THIRD QUAR 270.00
HEAN 254.50 3*0.00
4R0OEV 181.3B *e9-2*
0.0 I*7'71
0.0 74.46 118.39
45.00
100.00
77.71
165.5T 7.5 0.0
80.00 120.00
14Q.OO 180.00
107.86 . 137.64
38.86 43.86
10.0 C.«
I?.-'- -"
-------
CALIF As?B
>AOE 140
POLLUTANT CODE » 3
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE a 7
PER CENT OF POP AFFECTED » 90
POLLUTANT » CARBON MONOXIDE
CATEGORY • INFLUENZA
ROUND = 2
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
'12
13
1*
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST QUAR
THIRD OUAR
ABITH MEAN
STANDARD DEV
INCAPACITY
YL x
180.00
250.00
200,00
200.00
350.00
840.00
/
200.00
240,00
175,00
700.00
200.00
158.00
250.00
210.00
205.00
200.00
250.00
296.64
207.7Q
200.00
350.00
300.00
300.00
550.00
1*00.00
25Q.OO
300.00
275.00
800.00
225.00
1/7.00
300.00
230.00
300.00
230.00
350.00
404.07
329.59
YU
240.00
450,00
400,00
350.00
700.00
1960,00
300.00
360.00
400.00
900.00
250.00
220.00
35Q.OO
250.00
355,00
25Q.OO
450oOO
509,29
458,13
T
24
10
20
24
24
24
24
14
3*
?6
20
24
18
10
24,0
is.o
24,0
21,1
6,7
R
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0,0
0.0
0.0
DISABILITY
YL *
14Q.OO
175.00
150,00
175,00
150.00
420.00
180.00
210.00
120.00
160.00
160.00
110.00
150.00'
150.00
155,00
15Q.OO
175.00
175.00
74.78
l6u.QO
275.00
200.00
250,00
250,00
700.00
200.00
240.00
160.00
200.00
190.00
130.00
200.00
180.00
200.00
180.00
250.00
238,21
13«.78
YU
180.00
375.00
250.00
300.00
350.00
980.00
0.00
270.00
200.00
25Q.OO
220.00
160.00
250.00
200.00
250.00
200.00
300.00
284.64
219.44
T
I8
5
15
18
24
12
18
12
12
. 36
15
12
8
14
14.5
12.0
18.0
15.6
7.5
R
0
0
.0
'0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISCOMFORT •
YL ' x
120.00
150.00
60.00
100,00
30.00
90.00
160.00
150.00
60.00
100.00
125.00
87.00
60.00
110,00
100.00
60.00
125.00
100.14
38.92
140.00
200.00
100,00
130.00
40.00
180.00
180.00
190.00
100.00
120.00
155.00
107,00
100.00
140.00
135.00
100.00
180.00
134.43
44.27
YU T
160.00 1?
250.0^' H
140.0C 10
159.00 IT
50.00 1,5
I 250.00. t
200.00 If
240.00 U
160.00
'140.00 .
185.00 I :
132,00 i.
14Q.OO 4
160.00 2.
160.00 1 ?.<••.
146.00 10.0
200.00 13.0
169,00 11. S
53.91 S. >
•i
n
o
n
0
0
0
n
n
n
n
n
•'!
A
n
f..n
ii.n
f; . n
•l.n
. . "
-------
CALIF ARR
POLLUTANT CODE • 3
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE " 8
PER CENT OF POP AFFECTED « o
POLLUTANT ° CAHBON MONOXIDE
CATEGORY a UP RES? INFECT
ROUND s 2
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
;12
13
1*
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST QUAR
THIRD QUAR
ARITH MEAN
STANDARD OEV
INCAPACITY
YL x
82.00
50.00
60.00
66.00
,.100.00
440.00
60.00
65.00
65,00
40.00
70,00
40.00
80. -00
70.00
65.50
60.00
80.00
92.00
101.43
100.00
100.00
100.00
•52.00
140.00
800.00
30.00
120.00
120.00
60.00
100.00
58,00
100.00
90,00
100.00
90.00
320.00
147.1*
139.17
YU
120.00
150.00
140,00
145.00
180.00
1160.00
100.00
190.00
180.00
100.00
120.00
80.00
150.00
120.00
142.50
120.00
180.00
209.64
275.46
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
• 0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0,0
0.0
o.o
R
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0,0
0,0
0,0
0.0
DISABILITY
YL *
42.00
40.00
40.00
50.00
30.00
240,00
40.00
25.00
40.00
20,00
40.00
20.00
30.00
30.00
40.00
30.00
40.00
49.07
55,66
60.00
80.00
60.00
80,00
50.00
400,00
60.00
50.00
80.00
40.00
70.00
40,00
50,00
60.00
60,00
5U.OO
80,00
85.71
91.63
YU
80.00
120.00
121.00
113.00
80,00
560.00
80.00
75,00
127.00
flO.OO
90.00
60,00
100.00
90.00
90,00
SO. 00
120.00
127.21
126.23
T
0
0
0
0
0
. 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
o.o
0,0
0.0
o.o
DISCOMFORT
YL x
20.00
30.00
20.00
27.00
30.00
50.00
20,00
5.00
5.00
20.00
15.00
10.00
5.00
10.00
20.00
10.00
27.00
19. OT
12.52
30.00
50.00
60.00
47,00
40.00
80.00
4Q.OO
15.00
40.00
40.00
35,00
• 20.00
10.00
30.00
40.00
30.00
47,00
38,36
18.10
YU
45.00
70.00
101.00
87,00
60,00
110.00
60.00
35.00
85.00
80.00
65,00
39,00
20,00
60,00
62,50
45.00
85.00
65.50
25.61
V
T P
0 0
o n
0 0
o n
o n
o rt
!': 0
r, n
r n
n
r, n
0 0
r. n
0 0
0 . n .' . n
0 i r o . n
0 . :. •>' . 1
0 . f, =) . fl
0 • o !> « n
-------
CALIF ARP
PA3E 1*2
POLLUTANT CODE » 3
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE » a
«'
PER CENT OF POP*AFFECTED « 10
POLLUTANT » CARBON MONOXIDE
CATEGORY » UP RESP INFECT
ROUND • _
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
d
9
10
11 .
.12
13
14
15
16
HEOIAN
FIRST QUAR
THIRD QUAR
ARITH MEAN
STANDARD DEV
INCAPACITY
YL x
130.00
100.00
60.00
210,00
: 400.00
600.00
140,00
165,00
119,00
40.00
130.00
92.00
100.00
160.00
130,00
100.00
165.00
174,71
H9.56
160.00
175.00
120.00
250.00
600.00
1000.00
160.00
190.00
180.00
80.00
160,00
U20.00
iso.bo
1*0.00
167.50
150.00
180,00
251.07
248.43
YU
190.00
250.00
180.00
275,00
800,00.
UOO.OO
180,00
200.00
250.00
120.00
180.00
150.00
250.00
200.00
200.00
180.00
250.00
330.36
349.22
T
24
10
20
36
24
24
24
14
24
36
20
24
18
10
24.0
18,0
24.0
22.0
7.8
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 -
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0,0
0.0
DISABILITY
YL X
110.00
100.00
50.00
105.00
100.00
300.00
120.00
100.00
70.00
3p.OO
80.00
. 60.00
60.00
80.00
90.00
60.00
105.00
97.50
63.69
130.00
150.00
100,00
145.00
350.00
500,00
140.00
160.00
110.00
6U.OO
100,00
90.00
100.00
120.00
125.00
100.00
150.00
161.07
118.68
YU
160.00 .
200.00
140.00
200.00
500.00
700.00
160.00
190.00
160.00
90.00
120.00
110.00
140.00
160.00
160.00
140.00
200.00
216.43
170.19
T
18
5
15
12
12
12
12
10
6
24
12
6
8
5
12.0
6.0
12.0
H.3
5.3
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o -
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISCOMFORT
YL x
60.00
50.00
40.00
52,00
30.00
60.00
100.00
15.00
41,00
20.00
50.00
58.00
20.00
60.00
50.00
30.00
60.00
46.86
22.08
80.00
100.00
80.00
70.00
50.00
100.00
120.00
30.00
80.00
40.00
80.00
79,00
30.00
80.00
80,00
50.00
80.00
72.79
26.71
YU • »
100.00 !? •»
150.00 u- n
122.00 1C ft
106.00 1* ' 1
70.00 If "
140.00 • "
140.00 1 n
50.00 I' n
125.00 1 "
80.00 c •• n
110.00 I' n
105.00 I-1 n
So.OC - n
110.00 1 <'• ' n
108,00 11.- "•"
80.00 1 0 . ( -: • •">
125.00 Mr. • >'•'•
104.14 11..- ••."
31.78 b.l •••°
-------
CALIF ARB
POLLUTANT CODE a 3
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE » 8
('
PER CENT OF POP AFFECTED a 50
PAQE U3
POLLUTANT B CARBON MONOXIDE
CATEGORY a UP RESP INFECT
ROUND
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
e
9
10
11
;12
13
14
15
1-6
MEDIAN
FIRST QUAH
THIRD ciiAR
ARJTH MEAN-
STANDARD DEV
INCAPACITY
YL X
190.00
150.00
150.00
250.00
500.00
720,00
160.00
260.00
120.00
400.00
170,00
132.00
200. QO
IP 0.00
185.00
150 .00
260.00
255.86
171.38
220.00
330,00
?00.00
275.00
700,00
1200.00
180.00
300,00
rOO.OO
500.00
300,00
160.00
250.00
2 r. o.oo
225,00
200.00
300.00
3*3.93
237.08
YU
2*0.00
310.00
250.00
30~0.00
900.00
16BO.OO
200.00
340,00
300.00
600 .00
230.00
190.00
300.00
220,00
3 0 0., 0 0
230.00
340.00
432.86
4Q6.53
T
24
10
20
36
24
24
24
U
24
36
20
24
18
10
24,0
13.0
.24.0
22.0
7,8
R
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISABILITY
YL x
15Q.OO
125.00
80.00
125.00
100.00
360.00
140.00
150.00
70.00
150.00
130.00
.100.00
120.00
140.00
127.50
100.00
150.00
138,57
68.68
1?<;.00
175.00
120,00
190.00
350,00
600,00
16U.OO
180.00
120.00
180,00
150.00
120. -00
150.00
170oOO
170.00
150.00
180.00
202.50
127,56
YU
190.00 .
2SO.OO
160.00
200.00
500.00
840.00
180.00
230.00
180.00
200,00
180.00
140.00
180.00
2CO.OO
195.00
180.00
230.00
261.43
188.31
T
18
5
15
12
12
12
24
12
6
24
24
6
8
5
12.0
6.0
18.0
13.1
7.1
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
o.o
DISCOMFORT
YL x
100.00
100,00
40.00
80.00
30.00
85,00
120.00
15.00
58.00
40.00
110.00
70.00
30.00
90.00
75.00
40,00
100.00
69.14
33.72
120.00
150.00
80,00
110.00
50.00
140.00
140.00
30.00
100.00
60.00
140.00
87.00
50.00
110.00
105.00
60.00
140.00
97.64
39,12
YU
1*0.00 I
200.00
120.00 i
135.00
80.00 1
195.00'
160.00
50.00 5
155.00 I
100.00
170.00
118.00 i
80,00
140.00
137,50 ]?.
100.00 111.
160.00 ^^.
131,64 12.
43.84 t>.
•J .-1
.1. o
,1.0
•j.n
-------
POLLUTANT CODE » 3
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE
!'
PER CENT OF POP AFFECTED
CALIF ARH
8
90
PAOE
POLLUTANT a CARBON MONOXIDE
CATEGORY o UP RES? INFECT
ROUND
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
S
9
10
11
•;12
13
14
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST
TMIPO OUAR
fiaiTH MEAN
STANDARD OEy
INCAPACITY
YL x
200.00
200,00
200.00
200.00
600.00
840.00
200.00
240.00
200.00
7.00,00
190.00
153.00.
200,00
210.00
200.00
200.00
240.00
309.36
22*. 33
250,00
300.00
300.00
300.00
800.00
1*00.00
250.00
300.00
300.00
800,00
225.00
178,00
*
300,00
23Q.OO
300.00
250,00
300.00
*23t79
3*2.60
YU
300.00
400.00
*00.00
350.00
looo.oo
1960.00
300.00
360.00
400,00
900,00
255.00
220.00
350.00
250.00
355,00
300.00
400.00
531.79
472.55
T
24
10
20
36
24
24
24
14
24
36
20
24
18
10
24.0
18.0
?*.o
22.0
7.8
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0,0
0.0
DISABILITY
YL *
180.00
175,00
150.00
175.00
300.00
420.00
180.00
1*5.00
120.00
160.00
16Q.OO
100.00
150.00
160.00
160.00
150.00
180.00
183.93
81.36
200.00
275.00
250.00
. 250.00
450.00
700.00
200.00
200.00
180.00
200.00
190.00
130.00
200.00
160.00
200.00
190.00
250.00
257.50
147.45
YU
220.00
375.00
35o.OO
300.00
600.00
980.00
220.00
255.00
300,00
25Q.OO
220.00
158.00
250.00
200.00
252,50
220.00
35o.OO
334.1*
214.94
T
16
5
15
24
24
12
18
12
12
. 36
15
12
e
10
13.5
12.0
18.0
15.8
8.0
R
Q
0
0
6
0
0 "
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0..0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISCOMFORT
YL x
120.00
150.00
100.00
95.00
100,00
108.00
110.00
20.00
85.00
120.00
120.00
41.00
60,00
110.00
104,00
85.00
120,00
95,64
34.45
140.00
200.00
150.00
130.00
200.00
180.00
120.00
40.00
110.00
160.00
1*0,00
60.00
100.00
140.00
140.00
110.00
160.00
133.57
46,51
YU
160.00
250.00
200.00
175.00 ..-•
400.00 5
252.00
130,00 1
60.00
150.00
200,00 <-
1&0.00 2*
80,00 *
140.00 f
190.00
167.50
140.00
200.00 1 !•..'.
181.93 *••
83.00 ft.i
-------
CALIF ARH
POLLUTANT CODE '» 1
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE 3 s
PER CENT OF POP AFFECTED a 90 •
PAQE
POLLUTANT • CARBON MONOXIDE
CATEGORY o UP RESP INFECT
ROUND
« 2
DOCTOR
*
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
- ;i2
13
1ft
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST oufiR
THIRD O'jAR
iRITH MEAN
STANDARD OEv
INCAPACITY
YL x
200-.00
200,00
200,00
• 200.00
600.00
840,00
200.00
240.00
200.00
700.00
190.00
158.00
200.00
210.00
200.00
200.00
240. CO
309.36
224.33
250,00
300.00
300.00
300.00
800.00
1400.00
250.00
300.00
300.00
800.00
225.00
178.00
300,00
230.00
300.00
250.00
300,00
423.79
342,60
YU
300.00
400,00
400,00
350.00
looo.oo
1960.00
300,00
360.00
400,00
900,00
255.00
220.00
350.00
250.00
355.00
300.00
400.00
531.79
472.55
T
24
10
20
36
24
24
24
14
24
36
20
24
18
10
24.0
18.0
?*.0
22.0
7.8
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISABILITY
YL *
180.00
175.00
150.00
175.00
300.00
420.00
180.00
145.00
120.00
160.00
160.00
100.00
150.00
160.00
160,00
150,00
180.00
183.93
81.36
200,00
275.00
250.00
250.00
450.00
700,00
200.00
200.00
180.00
200.00
190.00
130.00
200.00
180.00
200.00
190.00
250.00
257.50
147,45
YU
220.00
375.00
350.00
300.00
600.00
980,00
220.00
255.00
300,00
25Q.OO
220.00
158,00
250,00
200.00
252.50
220,00
35o.OO
334.14
214.94
T
18
5
15
24
2*
12
18
I2
12
. 36
15
12
8
10
13,5
12.0
18,0
15.8
8.0
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISCOMFORT
YL x
120.00
150,00
100.00
95.00
100,00
108.00
110.00
20.00
85,00
120,00
120.00
41.00
60,00.
110.00
104,00
85.00
120,00
95.64
34,45
140*00
200.00
150.00
130.00
200.00
180.00
120.00
40.00
110.00
160,00
140,00
60.00
100.00
140.00
140.00
110.00
160.00
133.57
46.51
YU
160.00
250.00
200.00
175,00
400.00
252.00
130,00
60.00
150.00
200.00
160.00
80,00
1*0.00
190.00
167.50
140.00
200.00
181.93
83.00
V
L '1
0
...
' . ,1
s n
n
l 0
n
•-.
s.* n
2"» n
> o
2 ^
;
*- * '•
.< , . . •!
1 !• . r. ' . n
=;. - .1
B.i '.n
-------
i
PAOC U5
POLLUTANT CODE " 3
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE « 9
V
PER CENT OF POP AFFECTED a 0
INCAPACITY
POLLUTANT « CARBON MONOXIDE
CATEGORY • ASTHMA
ROUND » 2
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
•12
13
1*
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST QUAR
THIRD QUAR
ARITH MEAN
STANDARD OEV
YL
80.00
50.00
60.00
65.00
: 100.00
440.00
60.00
115.00
40.00
60.00
85.00
40.00
80.00
70.00
67.50
60,00
85.00
96.07
101.25
X
100.00
100,00
100,00
95,00
150.00
800.00
80.00
150.00
80.00
eo.oo
110.00
,60.00
100,00
90.00
100,00
80,00
110,00
149.64
188.83
YU
120.00
150.00
1*0.00
145.00
250.00
1160.00
100.00
200.00
1*0,00
100.00
125,00
80.00
150.00
110.00
1*0.00
110.00
150.00
212.1*
276.21
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0,0
0.0
0.0
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
YL
40,00
*o.oo
*o.oo
50.00
*o,oo
3*0.00
40.00
70,00
20.00
40.00
50.00
20.00
30.00
30.00
4Q.OO
30.00
50.00
6Q.71
81.38
X
60.00
80.00
80.00
80.00
60.00
400.00
60.00
11&.00
60.00
60.00
75.00
40.00
50.00
50.00
60.00
60.00
80,00
90.71
90.91
YU
80.00
120.00
120,00
115.00
80.00
560.00
80.00
1*5.00
100.00
80.00
95.00
60.00
100.00
70.00
97.50
80.00
120.00
128.93
126.20
T
0
0
0
0
0
. 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
o.o
0.0
YL
20.00
30.00
20.00
27.00
20.00
50.00
20.00
5.00
5.00
20.00
15.00
10.00
5.00
20.00
20.00
10.00
20.00
19.07
11.89
X
30,00
50.00
60.00
50.00
35.00
80.00
40.00
15.00
30.00
40.00
35.00
20.00
10.00
40.00
37,50
30,00
50.00
38.21
18,25
YU T
60.00 0
70,00 0
100.00 n
87.00 it
50.00
110.00
60.00
35.00 0
60.00 0
60.00 v
50.00 1
40.00 0
20.00 0
60.00 0
60.00 0.0
50.00 0.',
70.00 '.
61.57
24,37
j
n
o
n
n
o
0
0
"
n
.«
0
n
n
n
o.o
,,.n
-'
•'
. .1
-------
CALIF AR8
POLLUTANT CODE: -« 3
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE e 9
'«'
PER CENT OF POP AFFECTED « 10
PA3E U6
POLLUTANT = CARBON MONOXIDE
CATEGORY e ASTHMA
ROUND •
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
' lO-
ll
;i2
13
14
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST OUAR
THIRD OUAO
ARIT* MEAN'
STANDARD DEV
INCAPACITY
YL X
150..00
100,00
100.00
210,00
200.00
600.00
1*0.00
160.00
100.00
500.CO
125.00
107.00
100.00
120.00
132,5o
100=00
200=00
193.7i
156.38
17Q.OO
175.00
250,00
250,00
300,00
1000.00
160.00
185.00
14Q.OO
600.00
160.00
130,00
*
150.00
150,00
172.50
150-00
250. 00
272.86
2*1.65
YU
190,00
250.00
400,00
275.00
400.00
1400.00
180.00
215.00
198.00
700.00
180,00
158,00
25o,00
180.00
232,50
160.00
400.00
355.43
333.48
T
24
10
20
36
24
24
24
14
24
36
20'
24
18
10
1
24.0
18.0
24.0
22.0
7.8
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
o.o
0.0
0,0
0.0
DISABILITY
YL x
125.00
100.00
120.00
110.00
75.00
300,00
120,00
140.00
80.00
140.00
100.00
80.00
7Q.OO
9.0 ...00
105.00
80.00
125.00
117.86
57.30
4u.oo
150.00
165,00
14Q.OO
150.00
500.00
140.00
175.00
120.00
160,00
130.00
100.00
100.00
120.00
140.00
120«00
160.00
156.43
10*. 65
YU
160.00
200.00
198.00
170.00
250.00
700.00
160.00
215.00
178.00
200.00
165.00
130.00
150.00
150,00
174,00
160.00
200,00
216.14
142.72
T
18
5
8
24
24
12
18
10
12
• 36
15
12
8
H
13.0
10.0
18.0
15.4
8.2
R ^
0
0
0
0
0
Q
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0,0
o.o.
0.0
0,0
o.o.
DISCOMFORT
YL x
50. 00
50,00
70.00
52.00
30.00
60,00
100.00
10.00
40.00
80.00
55.00
57.00
20.00
60.00
53.50
40.00
60,00
52.43
23,20
70.00
100.00
100,00
70.00
40.00
100,00
120.00
25.00
80.00
100.00
90.00
88.00
30.00
80.00
84.00
70.00
100.00
78.07
28.60"
100.00
50,00
100.00
114,00 I/-.
90.00
130,00 1-
105,21 li.
35.20 ' i
-------
APR
PAOC 147
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
- 11
12
13
1*
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST QUAR
THIRD QUAR
ARITH MEAN
STANDARD DEV
POLLUTANT CODE " 3
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE a 9
PER CENT OF POP'AFFECTED « 50 •
INCAPACITY
YL. x YU
190.00 210.00 230.00
150.00 230.00 310.00
300,00 500,00
275.00
200,00
250.00
300,00
300.00
500.00 650,00
720,00 1?00.00 1680.00
160.00 ISQ.OO 200.00
260.00 300.00 340.00
113.00 IPO.00 275.00
700.00 800.00 9QO.OO
150.00 180.00 200.00
135.00 160.00 185.00
200.00 220.00 240.00
180.00 200.00 220.00
T
2*
10
20
36
2*
2*
2*
U
2*
36
20
2*
18
10
195.00 225.00
150.00 1BO.OO
260.00 300.00
265.21 352.5Q
195.13 2.97.97
POLLUTANT » CARBON MONOXIOF.
CATEGORY = ASTHMA
ROUND
287,50 2*,0 0,0
220.00 18,0 0.0
500.00 2*»0 0.0
**5.00 22.0 0,0
409,76 7.8 0.0
R
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.0
• 0
.0
.0
• 0
DISABILITY
YL *
1*5,00
125.00
100.00
155.00
100.00
360,00
1*0-00
150.00
70.00
130.00
100.00
110.00
100.00
1*0,00
127.50
100.00
145.00
137.50
68.61
16,, 00
175.00
150.00
175.00
350.00
600.00
160.00
190.00
9U.OO
180.00
120.00
1*0.00
159,00
170.00
165,00
ISO. 00
180.00
200.71
128.73
YU
180.00
280.00
200.00
220.00
500.00
840.00
180.00
230.00
150.00
?00«00
140.00
160.00
200.00
200.00
200,00
ISO. 00
230.00
262.86
168.21
T
18
5
6
12
12
12
2*
10
18
2*
2*
2*
8
5
12.0
8.0
24.0
1*.*
7.*
R .
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
o.o
0.0
0,0
o.o
DISCOMFORT
YL x
90.00
100.00
90,00
80.00
30.00
90.00
120.00
10,00
58.00
80.00
60.00
80.00
30,00
100.00
60,00
58,00
90.00
74.14
31.14
110*00
150.00
117.00
110.00
40.00
1*0.00
1*0.00
30.00
87,00
100.00
115.00
100.00
50.00
120.00
110,00
87,00
120.00
100.6*
37.19
YU
130.00
200.00
150.00
135.00
50.00
195, on
16Q.OO
50. on
138. on
120.00
145.00
130,00
80.00
1*0.00
136.50 1
120.00
150,00 1
130.21
44,93
-------
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
;12
13
1.4
15
CALIF ARR
POLLUTANT CODE » 3
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE B 9
'4*
PER CENT OF POP'AFFECTED » 90
PAGE us
POLLUTANT » CARBON MONOXIDE
CATEGORY » ASTHMA
ROUND
FIRST QUAR
4RITH MEAN
CEV
INCAPACITY
YL x
200.00
200.00
200.00
200.00
350.00
840,00
200.00
2*0.00
138.00
800,00
170.00
160.00
250'.00
210.00
200.00
200.00
250.00
297.00
227.18
?20.00
300.00
300.00
300.00
550,00
1400.00
250.00
300.00
200.00
900,00
200.00
1*0.00
300.00
230.00
300.00
220.00
300.00
402.1*
343.58
YU
230,00
400,00
400,00
350.00
700,00
I960, 00
300.00
360.00
300.00
1200,00
230.00
200,00
350,00
25o.OO
350.00
250.00
400,00
516.43
489.95
T
24
10
20
36
24
24
24
14
24
36
20
24
18
10
24.0
18. 0
24.0
22.0
7.8
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISABILITY
YL X
160.00
175.00
150.00
175.00
150.00
420.00
180.00
155.00
120.00
160.00
iSfl.OO
110.00
150.00
150.00
152,50
150.00
175.00
171.79
73.97
180.00
275.00
250,00
250.00
250.00
700.00
200.00
195.00
180,00
180.00
180.00
130,00
200.00
180.00
197.50
180,00
250.00
239.29
138,24
YU
200.00
375.00
35Q.OO
300.00
350.00
980.00
220.00
235.00
375.00
200.00
200.00
160.00
250.00
200.00
242. SO
200,00
350.00
306.79
204.89
T
18
5
10
24
2*
12
18
12
12
36
15
12
18
14
14.5
12.0
18.0
16.4
7.7
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISCOMFORT
YL x
120,00
150.00
100,00
95.00
12.00
108.00
80,00
20,00
70.00
140.00
100.00
41.00
60,00
110,00
97,50
60,00
110,00
86.14
41.63
140.00
200,00
200.00
142.00
20.00
18Q.OO
100.00
30,00
100.00
160.00
120.00
60.00
100.00
140.00
130.00
100.00
160,00
120.86
56,96
YU
160.00
250.00
300.00
175.00
40,00
252.00
120.00
50.00
130,00
200.00
140.00
80.00
140,00
190.00
150,00
120.00
200.00
159.07
75.99
I -.
1- -^
=-.
i
0
1;- 1-
I "
1 •: 1
n
? o
> 0
6.0 o . n
3 , r, i • . n
1 .- •• . •">
-------
CALIF AR«
PAGE
POLLUTANT CODE * 3
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE «> 10
.V
PER CENT OF POP AFFECTED a 0
POLLUTANT • CARBON MONOXIDE
CATEGORY • VIRAL
ROUND e 2
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
;12
13
14
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST QUAP
THIRD QUA?.
ARITH MEAN
STANDARD OEV
INCAPACITY
YL X
60.00
50.00
60.00
65.00
100.00
440.00
60.00
1 0 5 . 0 0
60.00
60.00
85.00
38.00
80.00
70.00
67,50
60.00
85,00
96.64
100.52
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
150.00
' 800.00
80,00
150.00
120.00
80,00
115,00
5*8 . 0 0
100.00
90.00
100.00
90.00
120.00
153.07
187.87
YU
120.00
150.00
140.00
150.00
250.00
1160.00
100.00
195.00
180.00
100.00
140.00
78.00
150.00
110.00
145.00
110.00
180.00
215.93
275.27
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
o.o
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISABILITY
YL *
50.00
4o.OO
40.00
42,00
40.00
240.00
40.00
20.00
40.00
40,00
45.00
18.00
30.00
30.00
40.00
30.00
42.00
51.07
55.12
70.00
80.00
80.00
70.00
.60.00
400.00
60.00
40.00
80.00
40.00
75.00
38.00
50.00
50.00
65.00
50.00
80.00
86,64
<»1.30
YU
100.00
120.00
120.00
105,00
80.00
560.00
80.00
70-00
140.00
80.00
105.00
58.00
100.00
70.00
100.00
80.00
120.*00
127.71
126.51
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.
0
0
0
0
0
o.o
0.0
0.0.
0.0
0 = 0
DISCOMFORT
. YL 'x
20.00
30.00
30.00
21.00
30.00
50.00
20.00
5.00
5.00
20.00
20.00
10.00
5.00
20.00
20.00
10,00
30.00
20.43
12,32
40.00
50.00
58.00
45,00
50.00
80.00
40.00
•10.00
40.00
40.00
40.00
18.00
10.00
40.00
40.00
40.00
50.00
40.07
18.47
YU
60.00 0
70.00<,"> 0
101.00 •:•
82.00
60.00 0
110.00 r,
60,00 0
20.00 >;
80.00
60,00
80.00
38,. oo ••;
20.00 C
60.00 0
60.00 0. ••
60.00 0
80.00
64.36
26. ?9
•i
n
n
n
n
n
,-1
0
0
.-.n
-------
• CALIF APP)
POLLUTANT CODE a 3
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE a 10
»"
PER CENT OF POP'AFFECTED a 10 •
150
POLLUTANT » CARSON MONOXIDE
CATEGORY * VIRAL BRONCHITIS
ROUND a 2
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
:i2
13
14
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST QUAR
THIRD CUAR
ARITH MEAN
STANDARD DEV
INCAPACITY
YL x
100-00
100.00
60.00
210.00
: 200.00
600. 00,
120.00
130.00
100.00
500.00
110.00
100.00
100.00
120.00
115.00
100.00
200,00
182.14
161.97
l3o«00
175.00
120.00
250.00
300,00
1000.00
140.00
165.00
180.00
600.00
160.00
123.00
150.00
150,00
162.50
14Q.OO
250.00
260.21
246.74
YU'
16Q.OO
250.00
180,00
275,00
400.00
1400.00
. 160.00
185.00
250.00
700.00
180.00
150.00
200.00
180,00
192,50
180.00
275.-00
333.57
339.45
T
24
10
' 20
24
24
24
24
12
24
36
20
24
18
10
1
24.0
18.0
24.0
21,0
6.9
R
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISABILITY
YL *
flfl-OO
100.00
50,00
110.00
75,00
300,00
100.00
'65.00
60.00
140.00
90.00
78,00
?o.oo
90,00
85,00
?0. 00
100,00
100,57
61.79
loy.oo
150.00
98.00
14Q.OO
150,00
500.00
120.00
115.00
120.00
160.00
120,00
98.00
106.00
120.00
120.00
100,00
150.00
149.36
103.00
YU
120«00
200.00
160,00
170.00
250.00
700.00
14Q.OO
175.00
180.00
200.00
160.00
120.00
15o.OO
150.00
165,00
150.00
200,00
205.36
146.40
T
18
'5
15
18
24
12
18
9
12
36
15
12
8
14
14.5
12.0
18.0
15.4
7.6
R
0
0
0
'o
0
0
0
.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISCOMFORT
YL x
So. oo
50.00
40.00
52,00
30.00
60.00
80,00
10.00
40.00
80.00
55,00
57.00
20.00
60.00
51,00
40,00
60,00
48,86
19.92
?o»oo
100.00
60.00
68.00
40.00
100.00
100.00
30.00
80.00
100.00
80.00
70.00
30.00
80.00
80,00
68.00
100.00
73.43
24.71
YU T
9o«00 10
iso.o'ir> 5
141.00 >
106.00 :
50.00
1 140.00
120.00
45.00
140.00
120.00
120.00 i
98.00 i-
50.00
100.00 t>
113,00 10...
90.00 »••
140,00 I ? .
105.00 11,
35.51 5..
9
n
n
n
n
-\
1
••
•1
?\
•1
n
n
0
0
.; . 0
..:.n
. o
.0
• . -1
-------
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
:*2
13
14
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST QUAR •
THIRD QUAR
ARJTH MEAN
STANDARD OEV
CALIF ARB
POLLUTANT CODE a 3
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE a 10
»"
PER CENT OF POP "AFFECTED a 50
INCAPACITY
YL X : YU
150.00 170.00 198,00
150.00 230.00 310.00
150.00 . 200.00 350,00
..250,00 275.00 300.00
300.00 500.00 650.00
720.00 1200.00 1680.00
180.00 200.00 220.00
180.00 250.00 320.00
120.00 200.00 300.00
PAOE 181
500.00 600.00 TOO. 00
170,00 200.00 230.00
132,00 i 160.00 190,00
200.00 250.00 300.00
180.00 -200.00 220oOO
POLLUTANT • CARBON
CATEGORY =• VIRAL BRONCHITIS
ROUND
T
24
10
20.
36 .
24
24
24
13
2*
3 . • n
50.00 l . f>
195.00 ••>
180,00 :
50.00
160.00 • •'"•
140,00 i
180.00 1 i
127,00 i - •>
80.00 • n
140.00 :: •'<
140.00 11.-".' i'.'i
120,00 10. u fi.n
180.00 !2'" 1J.'1
134.43 1! r» 'i.'i
48,48 5.S "."
-------
CALIF ARfl
POLLUTANT CODE > 3
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE a 10
«"
PER CENT OF POP'AFFECTED ° 90
PAOE
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
S
9
10
11
:i2
13
1*
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST Q-JAR
THIRD QUAR
ARITH MEAN
STANDARD DEV
INCAPACITY
X
YL
180.00
200.00
200.00
200.00
350.00 550.00
YU T
200.00 240.00 24
300.00 400.00 10
300.00 400.00 20
300.00 35Q.OO 36
700.00 34
840.00 1400.00 1960.00 . 24
200.00 250.00 3QO.OO 24
260.00 300.00 340.00 13
120.00 250,00 400,00 24
600,00 900.00 1200.00 36
200.00 225.00 250.00 20
159.00 . 180.00 200.00 24
250.00 3QO.OO 35o.OO 18
210.00 230.00 250.00 10
POLLUTANT a\ CARBON MONOXIDE
CATEGORY « VIRAL BRONCHITIS
ROUND
DISABILITY
R YL X YU
6 145.00 161.00 IfiQ.OO
0 175.00 275.00 375.00
0 150.00 25o.OO 35Q.OO
0 175.00 250,00 300,00
0 150.00 250.00 350.00
700.00
0 420,00
0
0
0 120,00
0 160,00 200.00
0 175.00 200.00
200.00 300.00 350.00 24.0 0.0
200.00 230.00 25o.OO 18.o 0.0
260.00 300.00 400.00 24eO 0.0
297.79 406.07 524.29 21.9 0.0
227.51 341.37 486.47 7,9 0.0
18Q.OO 20U.QO
125.00 160.00
200.00
980.00
0,00
200.00
300.00
25r,,00
2P5.00
107,00 130.00 153.00
147.00 200,00 25o.OO
150,00 180.00 200.00
IS'0,00 200.00 25o,00 13.0 0.0
145,00 180.00 200.00 10.0 0,0
175.00 250.00 350.00 18,0 0.0
169.93 239,64 294.14 15.4 0.0
75.25 13B.57 219.74 8.0 0.0
T
10
S
15
24
24
12
18
10
12
36
15
12
8
14
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
DISCOMFORT
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 -
0
YL
120.00
150,00
60.00
105.00
30.00
90.00
160.00
15.00
78.00
120.00
140.00
85.00
60,00
110.00
97.50
60,00
120,00
-9-4.5.0
43.27
X
130.00
200.00
100.00
132.00
40.00
180,00
180.00
35.00
120.00
140.00
175oOO
105.00
100.00
140.00
131.00
100.00
175.00
126.93
49.34
YU
1*0.00
250.00
142.00
154.00
50.00
250,00
200.00
50.00
178.00
160.00
195.00
130,00
14Q.OO
160.00
157.00
140.00
195.00
157.07
59.15
T
10
i»
10
a
n
o
n
ft
ft
o
n
D
n
rs
0
ft
0
n
-------
CALIF ARH
POLLUTANT CODE » 3
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE « 11
PER CENT OF POP*AFFECTED » 0 '
133
POLLUTANT » CARBON MONOXIDE
CATEGORY » BACT. PNEUMONIA
ROUND « 2
DOC'OR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
!0 .
11
12
13
14
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST QUAR.
THIPD QUAP
ARITH MEAN
STANDARD OEV
INCAPACITY
YL x .
65.00 .
50.00
60.00
35.00
100.00
440.00
40.00
90.00
40.00
60.00
80.00
40.00 :
SO. 00
120.00
62.50
40.00
90.00
92.86
103.08
SO. 00
100.00
100.00
60.00
150.00
800.00
80.00
120.00
100,00
BO. 00
11-0.00
60,00
100.00
. 140.00
100.00
80.00
120.00
148.57
1S9.33
YU
100.00
150.00
140.00
98.00
250.00
1160,00
120.00
Us. oo
160.00
100.00
140.00
82.00
150.00
160.00
142.50
100.00
160.00
211,07
276,17
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0,0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISABILITY
YL *
40.00
40.00
40.00
18.00
40.00
240,00
20,00
15.00
20.00
40.00
50.00
20.00
30.00
25.00
35.00
20.00
40.00
45.57
57.04
6y .00
80.00
80.00
40,00
60,00
400,00
60.00
40.00
60,00
60.00
80.00
*o.oo
50,00
50.00
60.00
50.00
80.00
82.86
92,36
YU
80.00
120.00
120.00
65.00
80,00
560.00
100.00
65.00
111.00
80.00
110.00
58.00
100.00
75.00
90.00
75.00
111.00
123.14
127.45
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
C
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
o.o
0.0
R
• o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
.0.0
o.o
DISCOMFORT ,
YL *
20.00
30,00
*0.00
5,00
30.00
30.00
10,00
5.00
5.00
20.00
20.00
7.00
5,00
5.00
15,00
5.00
30.00
16.57
12.18
30.00
50,00
60.00
18,00
40.00
40.00
-y
40.00
lOcOO
40.00
40.00
50.00
18.00
10.00
25.00
40.00
18.00
40.00
33,64
15.51
YU
40.00
70.00
100.00
38,00
50.00
50.00
70,00
20,00
eo.no
60.00
80.00
32.00
20.00'
55.00
52,50
38.00
70.00
54.64
23.68
o
0 1
o n
0 ft
0 1
0 n
0 .1
0 n
o n
o n
0 n
0.0 0 , n
o .n fl.o
0 '
-------
CALIC ARR
POLLUTANT CODE » 3
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE » 11
,V
PER CENT OF POP AFFECTED « 10
PAGE 194
POLLUTANT • CAK&ON MONOXIDE
CATEGORY » BACT« PNEUMONIA
ROUND
• 2
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
6
9
10
11
:i2
13
14
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST OUAR
TH1PO OUAR
ARITH MEAN
STANDARD DEV
INCAPACITY
YL x
160.00
100.00
60.00
130,00
200,00
600.00
100.00
145.00
100.00
500.00
120.00
95.00
100,00
160.00
125.00
100.00
160.00
183,57
160,38
180.00
175.00
120.00
165.00
300«00
1000.00
140,00
175.00
160.00
600«00
150.00
118,00
150.00
190,00
170,00
150.00
190,00
258.79
246«19
YU
200.00
250.00
182,00
200.00
400.00
1400.00
180.00
205.00
200.00
700.00
180.00
140,00
200,00
210.00
200.00
182.00
250.00
331.93
338.97
T
24,
10
15
96
24
24
24
14
24
24
20
24
18
10
24.0
15.0
24.0
25.1
21.1
R
0
0
0.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0,0
0,0
0.0
0.0
0,0
DISABILITY
YL *
120.00
100.00
50,00
87,00
75.00
300.00
60.00
45.00
60.00
140.00
80.00
70.00
70.00
95.00
77.50
60.00
100.00
96.57
64,20
1*0,00
15U.OO
100.00
122,00
150.00
500.00
100.00
85,00
100,00
160.00
110.00
92.00
100,00
120.00
115.00
100.00
150.00
144.93
104.96
YU
160.00
200,00
141.00
159,00
250.00
700.00
140.00
120.00
160.00
200«00
140.00
118,00
150.00
160.00
159.50
HOoOO
200.00
199.86
148.H
T
16
B
10
48
2*
12
18
12
12
2*
15
12
6
16
13.5
12.0
18.0
16.6
10.5
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
c.o
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISCOMFORT
YL x
65.00
50.00
40.00
56.00
30.00
35.00
20.00
10.00
40.00
80.00
45.00
52.00
20.00
50.00
42.50
30.00
52.00
42.50
18.92
80.00
lOOoOO
80.00
30.00
40.00
60,00
60.00
30.00
80,00
100,00
75.00
70.00
30.00
80.00
77,50
60,00
80.00
68.93
22,55
YU
100.00
150.00
120.00
102.00
50.00
85.00
100.00
50,00
120.00
120.00
100.00
95,00
50, 00
110.00
100,00
85.00
120.00
96.57
29.60
T
8 .
3
5
36
12
8
12
"1
12
18
10
12
4
10
10.0
7.0
12«0
11.4
8.0
0
0
ft
n
n
n
ft
0
0
n
' n
n
0
n
0
O.n
O.n
O.n
O.n
0.0
-------
CAL1? ARB
POLLUTANT CODE » 3
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE a 11
I*
PER CENT OF POP'AFFECTED a 50
INCAPACITY
PAOC 1159
POLLUTANT ° CARBON MONOXIDE
CATEGORY * BACT. PNEUMONIA
POUND •
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
DOCTOR
2 .
3 .
4
5
7
. 8
9
10
11
:12
13
1*
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST OUAP,
THIRD QUAR
ARITH MEAN
STANDARD DEV
YL
130.00
150.00
150.00
160.00 '
300»00
730,00
160.00
170.00
130.00
700.00
160.00
135. 00;
290.00
170.00
165.00
150.00
200.00
2*8.21
200.09
X
200.00
230aOO
200.00
195.00
500.00
1200.00
180.00
195.00
ISO .00
eooooo
ISO. 00
160.00
250.00
200.00
200.00
180.00
250.00
333.57
30*. 6*
YU
220.00
310.00
250.00
220.00
650.00
168.0.00
200.00
215.00
275.00
900.00
200,00
181.00
300.00
230.00
240.00
215.00
310.00
416.50
416.87
T
2*
10
20
96
2*
24
24
U
2*
2*
20
24
18
10
24.0
18.0
24.0
25.4
21.0
R
6
0
0
0
0
. 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
YL
1*0.00
125.00
100.00
110.00
100.00
390.00
1*0.00
110.00
96,00
160.00
110.00
105.00
100.00
110.00
110.00
100.00
140.00
135.57
75.57
X
16U.OO
175,00
iSfl.OO
1*0.00
200,00
600,00
160.00
145.00
1*0.00
180.00
140.00
125.00
150=00
150.00
150,00
1*0.00
175eoO
186.79
120. *9
YU .
180*00
280.00
200.00
18Q.OO
300.00
810.00
180.00
190.00
200.00
200.00
160.00
150,00
200.00
200.00
200.00
1*0.00
200.00
2*5,00
167.69
T
16
5
15
48
2*
12
18
12
12
2*
15
12
8
16
15.0
12.0
18.0
16.9
10>*
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
o.o
OoO
0.0
0*0
YL
•80.00
100.00
*0.00
60.00
30,00
60.00
120.00
15.00
60.00
80.0-0
90.00
72,00
30.00
70.00
65.00
*0.00
BO. 00
64.79
29.15
X
100.00
150.00
ao.oo
95.00
40.00
100.00
1*0.00
35.00
100.00
100.00
115.00
98.00
50.00
110.00
100.00
80.00
110.00
93.79
33.56
YU
120.00
200.00
120.00
126.00
50.00
1*0.00
160.00
50.00
158,00
120.00
140.00
120.00
80.00
140.00
123.00
120.00
140.00
123.1*
41.08
.T
3
5
10
36
12
a
12
9
12
18
10
12
4
10
To. o
8.0
12.0
11.9
7.7
9
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
' 0
0
f.
n
ft
O.o
0.0
0,n
0.0
O.n
-------
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
•12
13
14
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST
TKIRO QUAP
ARITH MEAN
STANDARD DEV
POLLUTANT CODE o 3
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE » 11
PER CENT OF POP*AFFECTED » 90
INCAPACITY
YL X
180»00 200*00
200.00 300*00
200,00 300.00
165,00 200.00
350.00 550.00
840.00 1400.00
180.00 200.00
200.00
175.00
120.00
200.00
POLLUTANT • CARBON'MONOXIDE
CATEGORY « RACT. PNEUMONIA
ROUND
DISABILITY
700.00 800*00
185,00 210.00
158.00 180.00
250*00 300*00
200.00 220.00
192.50. 215,00 275.00 24.0 0.0
175.00 200*00 235.00 18,0 0,0
250*00 300*00 400.00 24*0 0.0
278.79 375.71 472,86 26.3 0.0
216.39 342*07 473.59 21.1 0.0
YU
240
400
400
250
700
960
220
22S
300
'00
235
200
35o
240
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
T
24
10
20
96
24
24
24
14
24
36
20
24
18
10
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
YL
1*0
175
150
110
I5o
420
160
110
120
160
140
110
150
150
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.CO
.00
,00
.00
.00
,00
.00
.00
A
l6u
275
250
14b
250
700
180
U5
180
160
165
130
200
180
YU
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
• 00
.00
180
375
350
180
350
980
200
190
275
200
165
1*0
250
210
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
• 00
.00
.00
.00
.00
T
16
5
15
48
24
12
I8
12
12
. 36
15
12
e
16
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
150.00 18Q.OO 205.00 15.0 0.0
120.00 160.00 185.00 12.0 0.0
160.00 250.00 350.00 18.0 0.0
160.36 22^.29 291.79 17.8 0.0
77.52 143.51 210.68 11.4 0.0
DISCOMFORT
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
YL
100.00
150.00
60.00
65.00
30.00
90,00
1*0.00
15.00
80.00
100.00
120.00
90.00
60.00
100. CO
90.00
60.00
100.00
85.71
38.02
' X
120*00
200.00
100,00
100,00
40.00
uo.oo
160.00
35.00
120.00
120.00
125.00
110,00
100*00
140.00
120.00
100.00
140.00
115.00
42.43
YU
1*0.00
250.00
1*0.00
135.00
50.00
195.00
180.00
50.00
176.00
1*0.00
150.00
135.00
140.00
130.00
140.00
135,00
180.00
147.36
52.15
T
a
5
10
36
12
H
12
9
12
24
10
12
4
10
n
n
n
n
n
ri
o
o
o
-------
CALIF ARS
is?
POLLUTANT CODE « 3
POLLUTANT o CARBON MONOXIDZ
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE » 12
'i*
PER CENT or POP'AFFECTED a o
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST QUAR
THIRD QUAR
ARITH MEAN
STANDARD DEV
INCAPACITY •
YL X
80,00
50.00
60.00
125.00
90.00
440.00
40.00
60.00
80.00
60.00
60.00
38.00
60»00
70.00
65.00
60.00
80.00 .
95.21
101.70.
100.00
100«00
100.00
160.00
120.00
800.00
60.00
115.00
120»00
80.00
100.00
58,00
'100.00
90.00
100.00
90<00
120.00
150.21
188.76
YU
120,00
150,00
UO.OO
195.00 •
150.00
1160.00
80.00
155.00
180,00
100.00
120.00
75,00
140.00
110,00
140.00
110.00
155.00
205,36
276.90
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0,0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
CATEGORY a CHRONIC RESP
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISABILITY
YL *
58.00
00.00
40.00
22.00
35,00
240.00
20.00
15,00
20,00
40.00
40.00
20,00
30.00
30.00
32.50
20.00
40.00
46,43
56.92
60.00
80.00
30.00
53.00"
55.00
400.00
40,00
40,00
60,00
60.00
60.00
40.00
50.00
50.00
59.00
5Q.OO
60,00
80.93
92.69
DIS
ROUND a
YU
80.00
120.00
120.00
90.00
80.00
560.00
60.00
90.00
100.00
80.00
80.00
58.00
100.00
70,00
65, 00
8o<>oo
100.00
120.57
127.86
2
T
0
. 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0,0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISCOMFORT
YL x
20.00
30.00
20.00
19.00
30.00
35.00
10.00
5.00
5.00
20.00
5.00
10.00
5.00
20.00
19.50
5.00
20.00
16071
10,28
30.00
50.00
50.00
39.00
40.00
60.00
30.00
10.00
40.00
40.00
25.00
19.00
10.00
40.00
39.50
25.00
40.00
34,50
U.79
YU
40,00'
70.00
80.00
59.00
60.00
85.00
50,00
20.00
80.00
60,00
55.00
38', 00
20,00
60,0.0
59,50
40.00
70,00
55,50
2C.48
T
0
0
0
0
'o
0
0
0
0
0
n
n
0
0
0 . fi
0.0
0.0
0,0
0.0
Q
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
• n
n
n
0
n
O.n
O.n
05o
O.n
0,0
-------
CALIF
POLLUTANT CODE a 3
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE * 12
PER CENT OF POP AFFECTED a 10
PA3E. 138
POLLUTANT * CARBON MONOXIDE
CATEGORY ° CHRONIC P.ESP ois
ROUND
DOCIOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
:i2
13
14
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST QUAR
THIRD QUAR
ARITH MEAN
STANDARD DEV
INCAPACITY
YL X
167.00
100.00
60.00
145.00
350.00
600.00
80.00
90.00
ao.oo
500.00
90.00
100.00
100.00
120.00
100.00
90.00
167.00
184.43
171.47
1BO.OO
175.00
120.00
180,00
550.00
1000.00
100.00
135.00
1*0.00
600.00
125.00
120.00
150.00
150.00
150.00
125.00
180.00
266.07
263.71
YU
198.00
250,00
180.00
200,00
750.00
Uoo.oo
120,00
190,00
200.00
700.00
145.00
150.00
200.00
180.00
199.00
180.00
250.00
347.36
362.03
T
24
10
IS
24
24
24
24
12
24
36
20
24
18
10
24.0
15.0
24.0
20.6
7.1
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISABILITY
YL X
100.. 00
100.00
50.00
115,00
150.00
300,00
60.00
65.00
60.00
140.00
50,00
80.00
70.00
90.00
85.00
60.00
115.00
102.14
65.10
120,00
150.00
100,00
145.00
250.00
500.00
80.00
90.00
100.00
16U.OO
90.00
100.00
100.00
120.00
110.00
100.00
150.00
150.36
109.73
YU
140*00
200.00
142.00
185.00
350.00
700.00
100.00
125.00
160.00
200,00
115.00
1P8.00
150.00
150.00
150,00
123.00
200.00
203.21
155.46
T
18
5
10
16
24
12
18
10
12
36
15
12
6
14
13.0
10.0
18.0
15.0
7.7
DISCOMFORT
R YL X
0
0
0
0
0
0
. 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
50.00
50.00
40.00
48.00
30,00
50.00
40.00
10.00
40.00
80,00
25.00
55,00
20.00
60.00
44.00
30.00
50,00
42.71
17.78
70.00
100.00
80,00
80.00
50.00 •
ao.oo
60.00
30.00
80.00
100.00
60.00
70.00
30.00
80,00
75.00
60.00
80.00
69.29
21.65 '
YU
9fl«00
150.00
120.00
110.00
65.00
110.00
80.00
45.00
120.00
120.00
80.00
95,00
50.00
100,00
97.50
80.00
120.00
95,36
29.45
T u
1? •!
C
t;
10
i-
*-
! "•
-,'
r.
.J* n
is n
I?. ft
4 n
? o n
1 I . .1 0,0
fc . 0 0 . f>
1 c: . •• C,n
io.« o . n
5 . -- 0 . .1
-------
PAOC
POLLUTANT CODE « 3
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE » 12
«*
PER CENT OF POP'AFFECTED a 50
INCAPACITY
POLLUTANT e CARBON MONOXIDE
CATEGORY o CHRONIC RESP DIS
ROUND « 2
DISABILITY
DISCOMFORT
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
;12
13
14
. 15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST GUAR
THIRD QUAR
ARITH MEAN
STANDARD DEV
YL
180.00
150.00
150.00
170.00
450.00
720.00
120.00
120.00
100.00
700.00
145.00
128.00
200.00
180.00
160.00
128.00
200.00
250.93
212.00
X
200«00
230.00
200.00
200.00 .
600.00
1200.00
150.00
170.00
ISO. 00
800.00
170.00
150.00
250.00
200.00
200.00
170.00
25Q.OO
335.71
312.90
YU
220.00
310.00
250.00
250.00
800.00
1680.00
180,00
200.00
250.00
900.00
' 200.00
180.00
300.00
220.00
250.00
200.00
310.00
424.2^
426,74
T
24
10
20
24
24
24
24
13
24
36
20
24
18
10
24.0
18.0
24.0
21.1
6.8
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
o.o
YL
150.00
125.00
100.00
135.00
200.00
39Q.OO
100,00
60.00
80.00
160.00
80.00
98.00
100.00
140.00
112.50
98.00
15Q.OO
137.00
81.75
A
160,00
175.00
150.00
165.00
300.00
600.00
120.00
100,00
140.00'
180.00
120.00
118.00 .
150.00
160.00
155.00
120.00
175.00
188.43
127.61
YU
180.00
280,00
200.00
195.00
450.00
eio.oo
140.00
140.00
200.0.0
200.00
150.00
1*0.00
200.00
180.00
197.50
150.00
200.00
247.50
100.50
T
12
5
. 15
18
24
12
18
12
12
36
15
12
8
1*
13.0
12.0
18.0
15.2
7-5
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0,0
YL
65.00
100.00
40.00
85.00
30.00
70.00
60,00
15.00
60.00
80.00
60.00
60.00
30.00
100.00
60.00
40.00
85.00
62.50
26.44
X
100.00
150,00
60.00
115.00
50.00
120.00
90.00
30.00
100.00
100.00
90.00
60.00
50.00
120.00
95.00
60.00
115.00
89.64
32.96
YU
120,00
200.00
100.00
147,00
70,00
170.00
120,00
45.00
160,00
120.00
120.00
HOoOO
80,00
140.00
120,00
100.00
147.00
121.57
40.97
T
12
5
fl
1?
1?
o
\'e
S
I?.
?*
10
1?
4
20
1?,fi
B.O
12.0
! 1 . 3
5.4
a
0
n
n
0
n
n
0
n
n
0
n
rt
n
n
0.0
0.0
o.n
Oo<1
0,0
-------
CALIF ARB
POLLUTANT CODE • 3
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE a 12
PER CENT OF POP AFFECTED s 90
PAGE 160
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
a
9
10
11
;i2
13
14
15
16
INCAPACITY
YL X
200.00
200.00
200.00
190.00
500.00
840.00
180,00
160.00
120.00
700.00
180.00
1*5.00 :
250.00
210.00
220.00
300.00
300.00
' 220,00
700.00
UOO.OO
200.00
180.00
200.00
800.00
200.00
170.00
300.00
230.00
YU
230.00
400,00
400,00
300.00
900.00
1960.00
220.00
210.00
300.00
900.00
220.00
200.00
35(1.00
250.00
T
24
10
20
24
24
24
24
13
24
36
20
24
18
10
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
DISAJ
YL
160.00
175.00
150.00
155.00
25Q.OO
420.00
160.00
50.00
120.00.
160.00
140,00
110.00
150.00
150.00
POLLUTANT » CARSON MONOXIDE
CATEGORY • CHRONIC RESP ois
ROUND
.ITV
* YU .
180.00 200.00
275.00 375.00
250.00 350.00
180.00 200.00
400.00 550.00
700.00 980.00
180.00 200.00
115.00 165.00
180.00 275.00
180,00 200.00
160.00 180,00
132.00 1*0.00
200.00 250.00
180.00 200.00
a 2
MEDIAN
FIRST
THIRD GUAR
ARITH MEAN
STANDARD DEV
200.00 225,00 3QO.OC 24.0 6.0 152.50
180.00 200.00 220.00 18.0 0.0 140.00
250.00 300.00 400.00 24.0 0.0 160.00
291.07 387.14 48B.57 21.1 0.0 167,86
223.26 350.02 483.46 6.8 0.0 8^.12
T
18
5
15
18
24
12
18
12
12
36
15
12
8
14
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
18Q.OO 200.00 14.5 O.C
180.00 200.00 12.0 0*0
250.00 350.00 18.0 0*0
236.57 306,07 15.6 0.0
150,70 221.51 7.5 0.0
DISCOMFORT
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
YL
125.00
150.00
40.00
S7.00
30.00
95.00
140,00
10.00
ICO. 00
100.00
100,00
80,00
60.00
110,00
97.50
60.00
110.00
87.64
40.65
X
140.00
200.00
80.00
130.00
60.00
160,00
160.00
30.00
140.00
120cOO
120.00.
lOOoOO
100.00
140.00
125.00
100,00
140.00
120.00
43.85
YU
160.00
250.00
. 120.00
159.00
90.00
225.00
180.00
50.00
180.00
140.00
160.00
128.00
140.00
160.00
159.50
128.00
180.00
153,00
50.28
7
12
5
10
12
12
6
12
9
12
24
10
12
4
20
a
n
n
n
n
ft
n
n
n
n
• ft
o
ft
n
S.3 0,f>
-------
CALIF ARS
POLLUTANT CODE e 3
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE a 13
'I*
PER CENT OF POP AFFECTED * 0
PAGE
POLLUTANT o CARBON MONOXIOF
CATEGORY e » CHRN OBST LUNG
ROUND
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
;12
13
1*
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST QUAR
THIRD QUAR
ARITH MEAN
STANDARD DEV
INCAPACITY
YL x
82.00
50.00
60,00
107,00 "
90.00
440.00
40.00
65.00
60.00
60.00
30.00
40. OO;
80. 00
70.00
65,00
50.00
85.00
92.43
102.36
100*00
100.00
100. CO
150.00
120.00
800.00
70.00
115.00
100.00
SO. 00
60.00
58.00
100.00
90.00
100.00
80.00
115.00
145.93
189.81
YU
120.00
150,00
140.00
198.00
145,00
1160.00
100.00
160.00
160.00
100.00
90.00
80.00
150.00
110.00
142.50
100.00
160.00
204.50
276.95
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
o.o
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
o.o
0.0
0.0
o.o
DISABILITY
YL X
40«00
40.00
40,00
85.00
35,00
24Q.OO
30oOO
25.00
20.00
40.00
20.00
19.00
30.00
30.00
32.50
25.00
40.00
49,57
57.20
6U.OO
80.00
80,00
120.00
55.00
400,00
60.00
45.00
60.00
60.00
40.00
39.00
50.00
50.00
60.00
50,00
80.00
85,64
92<>85
YU .
80.00
120.00
120.00
160.00
80.00
560.00
90.00
65.00
118.00
BO. 00
80.00
5R,00
ICO. 00
70.00
85,00
80.00
120.00
127,21
127.56
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0,0
0.0
0.0
o.o
o.o
R
0
0
0
0
0
-0
0
0
0
. 0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
o.o
DISCOMFORT
YL x
21.00
30.00
20,00
41.00
30.00
45.00
30.00
5.00
5.00
20.00
5.00
10,00
5.00
20.00
20.00
5.00
30.00
20.50
13.48
30.00
50.00
50.00
SQoOO
40.00
80.00
50.00
10.00
40.00
40.00
20.00
18.00
10.00
40.00
40.00
20.00
50,00
39,86
21.99
YU
50.00
70.00
90.00
105.00
50.00
105.00
70.00
20.00
80.00
60.00
. 40.00
35,00
20.00
60.00
60,00
40,00
80.00
61.07
27.68
.T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o.n
o.o
o.o
o.o
o«o
Q
n
n
n
n
n
0
0
n
ft
' 0
o
fl
r<
n
o.n
c.n
o.o
O.ft
o.n
-------
CAL1P ARB
POLLUTANT CODE « 3
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE » 13
"«'
PER CENT OF POP'AFFECTEO a 10
PAQE 162
POLLUTANT " CARBON MONOXIDE
CATEGORY « M CHRN OBST LUNO
ROUND a 2
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
:i2
13
1*
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST QUAR
THIRD QUAR
ARITH MEAN
STANDARD DEV
INCAPACITY
YL X
160-00
100.00
60.00.
200.00
350.00
600 .00
120.00
115.00
80.00
500.00
95.00
78.00
100.00
120.00 .
117,50
95.00
200.00
191.29
169.38
IPO'OO
175.00
120.00
275.00
550.00
1000.00
1*0.00
155.00
1*0.00
600.00
125.00
100,00
150.00
150.00
152.50
1*0.00
275.00
275.71
260.9*
YU
200«00
250.00
180,00
300.00
750.00
1*00.00
160.00
195,00
200.00
700.00
155,00
130.00
200.00
. 180.00
200,00
180.00
300.00
357.1*
358.27
T
24
10
15
2*
2*
24
2*
1*
2*
36
20
2*
18
10
24.0
15.0
24.0
20.8
6.9
R
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
\
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISABILITY
YL *
120-00
100,00
60,00
190,00
150.00
300.00
80.00
105.00
60,00
I*0o00
50.00
55,00
70.00
90,00
95,00
60.00
140.00
112.14
67.76
I4y.o0
150.00
100,00
220,00
250.00
500,00
110.00
135.00
100.00
160.00
80.00
75,00
100.00
120cOO
127.50
100>00
160.00
160,00
109.88
YU
160.00
200.00
140.00
260.00
350.00
700.00
1*0.00
155.00
160.00
200.00
110.00
95.00
150.00
150.00
157,50
1*0.00
200.00
212.14
154.57
T
18
5
10
16
2*
12
IB
9
12
36
15
12
a
14
13.0
10.0
18.0
14,9.
7.7
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISCOMFORT
YL x
So. 00
50.00
20.00
73.00
30.00
60.00
50.00
15.00
20.00
8Q.OO
20.00
30.00
20.00
60.00
40.00
20.00
60.00
41.29
21.82
7fl«00
100,00
60,00
100.00
50.00
100.00
80.00
30.00
60.00
100.00
45.00
45.00
30.00
80.00
65.00
45.00
100.00
67,86
26.00
YU
9c«CO
150.00
100.00
128,00
60.00
1*0.00
110.00
*5.00
120.00
120.00
80.00
65.00
50.00
100.00
100.00
65.00
120.00
97.00
33.41
T
12
5
5
10
12
6
12
8
12
24
10
12
4
20
11.0
6.0
12.0
10.9
5.6
a
ft
ft
n
0
ft
0
ft
ft
ft
' n
ft
fl
n
ft
O.ft
O.ft
e,n
O.ft
C.ft
-------
CALIF ARfl
PAGE 163
DOCTOR
2
3
5
7
. 8
9
10
11
•12
13
14
15
16
rOLLUTANT CODE • 3
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE » 13
PER CENT OF POP* AFFECTED « 50
INCAPACITY
YL X
190.00
150,00
120.00
220.00
450.00
720.00
140.00
140.00
120.00
700.00
140.00
110.00 i
200.00
180.00
210.00
230.00
160.00
• 300.00
600.00
1200.00
160,00
195.00
180.00
800.00
170.00
132.00
250.00
200oOO
YU
230.00
310.00
200.00
350.00
800,00
1680,00
180.00
235.00
' 275.00
900.00
200.00
160,00
300.00
220.00
POLLUTANT « CARBON MONOXIDE
CATEGORY = M CHRN OBST LUNG
ROUND a
T
24
10
20
24
24
24
24
14
24
36
20
24
18
10
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
DISABILITY
YL *
145,00
125.00
100.00
200.00
200.00
390.00
120.00
95.00
100.00
160.00
105.00
90,00
100.00
140.00
160.00
175.00
1*0.00
250.00
300.00
600.00
14U.OO
145.00
140.00
18U.OO
140.00
10?. 00
150.00
160.00
YU
leo.oo
280.00
180.00
300.00
450.00
810.00
160.00
195.00
200.00
200.00
160.00
132.00
200.00
180.00
2
T
18
5
IS
18
24
12
18
10
12
36
15
12
8
14
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
DISCOMFORT
YL x
80.00
100.00
40.00
70.00
30.00
90.00
100.00
20.00
58.00
80.00
70.00
SO.0'0
30.00
100.00
100.00
150»00
70.00
100.00
50.00
uo.oo
120.00
30.00
100.00
100.00
95.00
65.00
50.00
120.00
YU
118.00
200.00
100.00
140.00
70.00
195.00
1*0.00
45,00
158.00
120.00
130,00
90.00
80.00
140.00
T
12
5
8
12
12
k
\?
*
I?
2*
10
1?
H
20
0
n
n
n
0
0
n
n
n
n
0
n
n
n
0
MEDIAN
FIRST
THIRD QUAR
AR1TH MEAN
STANDARD DEV
165,00 205,00 255.00 24.0 0,0 122.50
140.00 170.00 200.00 18.0 0.0 100.00
220.00 300,00 350.00 ?4.0 0.0 160.00
255.71 341,93 431,43 21,1 0,0 147.86
210.23 311.40 424.75 6.7 0.0 78.66
155.00 197.50 14.5 0.0 70.00 100.00
140.00 180.00 12.0 0*0 4Q.OO 65.00
180.00 280.00 18.0 0,0 90.00 120,00
198.79 259.07 15.5 0.0 65.57 9.2.1*
125.89 177.85 7.6 0,0 27.9? 35.18
125.00 I2.fi 0.0
90oOO «•» 0.0
140.00 !,'.'•> »«n
O.n
44,42
-------
CALIF ARR
POLLUTANT CODE « 3
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE * 13
"*"
PER CENT OF POP'AFFECTED o 90
PAOE
POLLUTANT » CARBON MONOXIDE
CATEGORY • M CHRN OflST LUNO
ROUND
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
3
9
10
11
:i2
13
14
15
16
MEOtaN
FIRST QUAR
THIRD QUAR
ARITH MEAN
STANDARD OEV
INCAPACITY
YL x
200.00
200.00
200.00
250.00
500.00
840.00
200,00
160.00
120.00
700.00
175,00
140.00
300.00
210.00
200.00
175.00
300.00
299.64
221.09
220.00
300.00
300.00
350.00
700.00
1400,00
250,00
200.00
200.00
800.00
200.00
160,00
300«00
230.00
275.00
200.00
350.00
400.71
344,62
YU
230.00
400,00
400.00
400.00
900.00
1960.00
300.00
240.00
300.00
90,1,00
225.00
187.00
35o,00
250,00
325,00
24o.OO
400.00
503.00
477.22
T
24
10
20
24
24
24
24
14
24
36
20
24
18
10
1
24.0
18.0
24.0
21.1
6.7
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
. 0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISABILITY
YL A
160.00
175,00
150.00
210. CO
250.00
420.00
180.00
115.00
120.00
160.00
150.00
105.00
ISQ.OO
150.00
155.00
150.00
180.00
178.21
79.05
180.00
275.00
250,00
300,00
400.00
700,00
20U.OO
165.00
180.00
18U.OO
170.00
125,00
200.00
180.00
190,00
180.00
275.00
25o,36
147.28
YU
200.00
375.00
350.00
350.00
550.00
980.00
0.00
195.00
275.00
200.00
'00.00
147.00
25Q.OO
200.00
225,00
200.00
350,00
305.14
232.50
T
18
5
15
18
24
12
18
12
12
36
IS
12
7
14
!4.5
12.0
18,0
15.6
7.6
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
. 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISCOV
YL
122.00
150.00
40.00
105.00
30.00
95.00
160.00
20.00
120.00
100.00
120.00
80.00
60.00
110.00
102.50
60.00
120,00
93.71
42.86
1FORT
X
140.00
200,00
80.00
140,00
60.00
180.00
180.00
35.00
160.00
120,00
140.00
100.00
100.00
140.00
1*0.00
100.00
160cOO
126.79
47.54
YU
160.00
250.00
120.00
170.00
90.00
265. nn
200.00
50.00
200.no
140,00
1&0.00
128.00
140.00
160.00
160.00
128,00
'200.00
159«50
57.41
T 3
1? n
•: 0
If; n
i. n
;.• n
*. n
• •' n
••< o
1 ' n
?« n
lo n
> > f)
4 n
?0 0
]?... i..O
9, n c «n
1 ( . r. ;> v n
11.. 'i . "
H . 3 o . n
-------
CALIF
P&OC 165
POLLUTANT CODE » 3
POLLUTANT » CARBON MONOXIDE
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE a 14
. ['
PER CENT OF POP AFFECTED » 0 •
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
-------
C4L1? ARB
PAflE 166
POLLUTANT CODE * 3
POLLUTANT Q CARBON MONOXIDE
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE a 14
I*
PER CENT OF POP AFFECTED a 10
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
.12
13
14
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST QUAR'
THIRD QUAR
ARITH MEAN-
STANDARD DEV
INCAPACITY
YL x '
120.00
100.00 .
60.00
..220.00
150.00
. 35.00
1*0.00
95.00
60.00
• 500.00
60.00
80.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
.80.00
140.00
133.57
113,87
1*0.00
175.00
100.00
2 s CHRN ORST
R
0
0
0
. 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0,0
0,0
DISABILITY
YL *
80.00
100.00
20.00
200.00
75,00
60.00
120.00
40.00
*0.00
120.00
20.00
55.00
70.00
90.00
72.50
40.00
100,00
77.86
47.71
100,00
150.00
60,00
230.00,
150.00
100.00
1*0. CO
85.00
80.00
1*0.00
60.00
70.00
100.00
120.00
100.00
80,00
1*0.00
113.21
46.23
LUNG
POUND i
YU
120.00
200.00
100.00
280.00
200.00
1*0.00
160.00
115.00
1*0«00
200.00
PO.OO
92.00
150.00
150.00
1*5.00
115.00
200,00
151.93
53.74
3 2.
T
2*
5
10
48
24
2*
18
10
12
36
20
24
8
18
19.0
10.0
24.0
20.1
11.6
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
0,0
0.0
0,0
0.0
DISCOMFORT
YL x
40.00.
50.00
20.00
60.00
30.00
35,00
100.00
5.00
25.00
60.00
15.00
25.00
19.00
50.00
32.50
20.00
50,00
39,57
26.40
60.00
100.00
60.00
110,00 .
40.00
6C.OO
120.00
25.00
60.00
80.00
40.00
42.00
30,00
70.00
60.00
40,00
80,00
64.07
29.37
YU T
80,00 16
150,00 S
100.00 t
140.00 2-
50,00 1.2
85.00
140.00 I/
* 0 , 00 'i
100.00 I?
120,00 :J-
60.00 1-
61,00 ! ?
50.00
100.00 '<>'•,
92.50 1?.0
60,00 b • •'•
120,00 1 ''. "
91.14 U.--
36.53 *.-
R
0
n
n
.• <»
n
n
0
n
n
n
*
n
n
n
o.n
o.n
0.0
o.o
0.0
-------
CALIF ARH
PAUC 167
POLLUTANT CODE » 3
POLLUTANT o CARBON MONOXIO?
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE a 14
.'I
PER CENT OF POP AFFECTED s 50
DOCTOR
2
3
*
5
7
3
9
10
11
12
13
1*
15
16
MEDIAN
FIRST QUAR
THIRD QUAR
ARITH MEAN
STANDARD DEV
INCAPACITY
YL X
162.00
150.00
80.00
230.00
200.00
105.00
160.00.
115.00
100.00
700.00
90.00
lOOcOO
160.00
130.00
1*0.00
100.00
162.00
177.29
156.52
IflO.OO
230.00
120.00
310.00
3nO.OO
180,00
180,00
1*5.00
140.00
800,00
125.00
118,00
?00.00
155.00
180.00
1*0.00
230.00
227.36
175.66
YU
200.00
310.00
162.00
360.00
500.00
255.00
200,00
185.00
200.00
900.00
1*5,00
140.40
250.00
185.00
200.00
185.00
310.00
285.1*
201.96
T
36
10
20
96
2*
48
2*
1*
24
36
25
2*
18
12
2*.0
18.0
36.0
29.*
21.7
CATEGORY •» s CHRN OBST
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0
OoO
0.0
o.o
o.o
DISABILITY
YL *
130.00
125.00
*o.oo
25Q.OO
100.00
85.00
1*0.00
65.00
80.00
160.00
60.00
70.00
100.00
115.00
100.00
70.00
130.00
108.57
52.89
1*0.00
175.00
80.00
270.00
175,00
UO.OO
160.00
110.00
120.00
180.00
95.00
90.00
150.00
140.00
1*0.00
110.00
175.00
1*4.6*
48.50
LUNG
ROUND i
YU
J60.00
280,00
120.00
300.00
250,00
195.00
IPO. 00
150,00
180.00
200.00
120.03
115.00
200.00
170.00
180.00
150.00
200.00
187,1*
57.13
• 2
T
2*
5
10
72
2*
2*
18
10
12
36
20
2*
a
IB
19.0
10.0
24.0
21.8
16,7
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o.o
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
DISCOMFORT
YL x
60.00
100.00
30.00
85.00
30.00
60,00
120.00
10.00
60.00
80.00
40.00
40.00
30.00
90.00 '
60.00
30.00
85,00
59,6*
31.77
80.00
150.00
"70.00
118.00
45.00
100.00
1*0.00
30.00
100.00
100.00
70.00
60,00
50.00
115.00
90.00
60.00
115.00
87,71
35.91
YU
100.00
200,00
110.00
1*7.00
70.00
1*0.00
160,00
*5,00
160.00
120,00
100.00
83.00
80.00
1*0.00
115.00
83.00
1*7.00
118.21
*2«13
T W
1« n
r. (1
>; n
.'•• n
1 ? 0
n
1 - n
* n
i ,- n
?'. -o
15 n
>2 «
4 0
20 0
12,0 o.n
8.0 o.n
ia,o o.n
13.1 o.n
6.4 O.n
-------
CALSP
POLLUTANT CODES 3
. ('
POLLUTANT e CARBON MONOXIDE
168
POPULATION CATEGORY CODE a 14
PER CENT OF POP AFFECTED =" 90
DOCTOR
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
:i2
13
1*
15
16
INCAPACITY
YL x
160
200
100
280
300
150
180
140
120
700
140
121
200
175
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
200»00
300.00
150.00
360.00
400.00
250.00
200.00
165cOO
180.00
800.00
170»00
1*1.00
25o,00
210.00
YU
24o«00
*00.00
200,00
*20.00
600.00
350.00
250.00
200.00
275.00
900.00
190,00
165,00
300.00
230.00
CATEGORY Q s CHRN OSST
T
36
10
25
96
24
48
24
14
24
36
25
24
18
12
R
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
DISABILITY
YL X
122»00
175.00
47.00
22Q.OO
150.00'
105.00
160.00
110,00
100.00
160.00
IOC. 00
100.00
120.00
150.00
i*u.oo
275.00
100.00
320.00
250.00
ISO. 00
180.00
130,00
1*0.00
189.00
13C.OO
118.00
1&0.00
180.00
LUN9
ROUND o
YU
160. 00
375.00
150.00
380.00
350.00
235,00
200«00
170.00
180.00
200.00
160.00
150.00
200.00
200.00
2
T
24
5
20
72
2*
2*
18
12
12
.36
20
24
8
18
R
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
DISCOMFORT
YL x
BO.oo 100.00
150,00 200<,00
40.00 80,00
112.00 152.00
30.00 40.00
70.00 145.00
1*0.00 160.00
10.00 30*00
60,00 100.00
100.00 120.00
70.00 100.00
53.00 78,00
6C.OO 100.00
110.00 160.00
YU
120.00
250.00
120.00
180.00
70.00
210.00
180.00
35.00
160.00
HO. 00
130, CO
100.00
1*0.00
170.00
T
18
S
10
30
12
a
\t
10
12
24
15
12
4
20
a
0
0
«
n
0
n
s
0
n
' a
0
0
n
ft
FIRST QUAR
THIRD OUAR
ARITH MEAN
STANDARD DEV
167.50 205.00 262.50 24,0 0.0 121,00
140.00 170.00 200.00 18.0 0.0 100.00
200.00 300.00 400.00 . .16.0 0.0 160.00
211,36 269.71 337.14 2<>.7 0.0 129,93
151.76 171.23 199.91 21,6 0.0 *2.52
170.00 200.00 20.0 0.0 ?0,00 100.00
130.00 160.00 12.0 0.0 58.00 8Q.OO
180.00 235.00 24.0 0.0 110.00 145.00
177.36 222.1* 22.6 0.0 77,86 110.36
63«41 82.*»2 16.2 0.0 40.42 46.58
140,00 12.0 C.fi
12C.OO 10.0 CoO
180.00 18.0 O.n
1*3.21 13,7 O.n
55.32 7.2 C.O
------- |