Contract No, 68-02-0208
Report No. IITRI-C6241-7
ELECTRON PARAMAGNETIC RESONANCE (EPR) INVESTIGATION OF
LIMESTONES AND THEIR CALCINES AND CORRELATION WITH
REACTIVITY WITH ACID GASES
Prepared by

Nicholas A. Ashford and Frank H. Jarke

IIT Research Institute
10 West 35th Street
Chicago, I   nois 60^  L6
18 February
Final Report for Period 23 June 1970 through 22 Januarv 1972
Prepared foi

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
411 West Chapel Hill Street
Durham, North Carolina 27701

-------
                    MANAGEMENT SUMMARY

     The investigations reported herein were performed in
the Physical Chemistry Section of the Chemistry Division of
IIT Research Institute.  Dr.  Nicholas A. Ashford,  Research
Chemist, acted as project leader and was responsible for
the experimental design and interpretation.   Mr. Frank H.
Jarke, Assistant Chemist, performed the experimental work
and assisted in the experimental design and  interpretation.
Dr. Elliott Raisen, Manager of Physical Chemistry,  was
responsible for general administration of the program.

-------
                         FOREWORD
     This report No. IITRI-C6241-7 is the Final Technical
Report on IITRI Project C6241, Contract: No. 68-02-0208,
entitled "Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) Investiga-
tion of Limestones and Their Calcines and Correlation with
Reactivity with Acid Gases".  This program is being conducted
by I IT Research Institute, 10 West 35th Street, Chicago,
Illinois for the Environmental Protection Agency, Durham,
North Carolina 27701, and covers the period from June 23, 1971
through January 22, 1972.  The program monitor is Dr. Dennis
C. Drehtnel.
                             Respectfully submitted,
                             IIT RESEARCH INSTITUTE
Approved by:
           X
Elliott Raisen
Manager
Physical Chemistry Research
NAA:FHJ:rta
                             Nicholas A. Ashford
                             Research Chemist
                             Physical Chemistry Research
                                                 _
                             Frank H. Jarke
                             Assistant Chemist
                             Physical Chemistry Research
                             11

-------
                         ABSTRACT
     A research program was undertaken to investigate a
selected set of calcined and uncalcined carbonate rock samples
by electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy in
order to (a) assist in the characterization of marls and
chalks to identify properties which account for their high
reactivity with SC^, (b) establish a semi-quantitative basis
for evaluating a crystalline order of limestones to predict
their reactivity with acid gases, (c) investigate the effect
of altering the calcination temperature on the crystalline
structure of calcines in order to identify those properties
which account for the varying reactivity and deadburning,
and (d) investigate the effects of slaking on the crystalline
parameters of calcines produced at different temperatures in
order to support wet limestone scrubbing process development„
             _l	i_
     Using Mn   as a probe of calcium carbonate crystallinitys
the fitting of Mn"1""1" EPR linewidth data to the S02 reactivity
and capacity data resulted in correlation coefficients of
r=0o55 and r=0.49 respectively„  No significant EPR linewidth
correlation was found for the reactivity and capacity of
calcined materials.  However, in a calcined series in which
the calcination temperature was varied producing variations
in density, a good correlation of the EPR linewidths was
found with the density data,  Hydration of calcined materials
                                   J	L
produces a hydrated site for the Mn   which gives a different
                                                 I [
and distinguishable EPR spectrum than that for Mn   in
unhydrated sites„  Quantitative measurement of the degree of
hydration was therefore possible.
                            111

-------
                                                     2
                    SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

1.   The fitting of Mn*"1" EPR linewidth data to the SO,

reactivity and capacity data resulted in correlation coeffi-

cients of r=0.55 and r=0.49 respectively, for all the carbonate

samples except dolomites.  From the qualitative observations that

within acarbonate type, the sharper and better-resolved
  i I
Mn   lines occur for the more reactive material, it: is

believed that better linewidth correlation might be found

within any carbonate type.  Variations of the inherent

structure, of even a perfect lattice from carbonate type

to carbonate, type might account for a not-larger correlation

among all the. samples.


2.   The effect of room temperature ultraviolet-irradiation

of Michigan Marl. (Typt;  ].„ #2129) under high vacuum is signi-
ficant.  Fe   is promoted to Fe^^T without (presumably) a

change in the surface area or pore volume.  The increase in
  I i i
Fe    is maintainable in air - i.e. stable.  This suggests

that (permanent) decoration of the defect state, of the

carbonates may be possible in order to utilize photo-created
  I i i                                              i	i
Fe    as a measure of crystallinitys as well as Mn


3.   In the Type 1 Iceland spar calcine, the low S09 capacity

anisotropic 1700°F calcine with a high degree of strain shows
     I [ |
no Fe    center while the higher-capacity isotropic 1800°F

calcine yields the Fe1''  center.  Thus, while Fe**"*" seems to
                            iv

-------
be an indicator of S02 capacity, its role is by no means clear

at this time.  However, there are two other EPR parameters
                       i	i_
relating to impurity Mn   ions which may indicate the degree

of crystallinity of the materials; transitions which are

quantum-mechanicslly forbidden and the fine structure.  As

expected, the 1800°F calcine with the more perfect lattice

results in weaker forbidden transition intensitites and

stronger transitions corresponding to the fine structure.



4.   In the 2061 calcine series, in which five different

temperatures were used to calcine the same carbonate material,
      I	L.
the Mn   linewidths did prove to correlate well with the density


data.  The SO,-, reactivity and capacity data did not correlate
           I i
with the Mn   linewidths either in this series or in any of

the calcines investigated.  Reactivity, however, depends on

both the density and the initial crystallinity, the latter
               J	L
to which the Mn   EPR is not sensitive.



5.   The EPR results on the calcined samples after soaking

with water and drying indicate the presence of a second
           j	i_
site for Mn   which is most probably the hydrated oxide

site.  The near linear relationship of the EPR data for the

variable temperature Series 2061, 2062 and 2069 with the

results of the slaking test is independent evidence of the

assignment of the new EPR lines to Mn   in hydrated sites.

The small shift observed for the field positions of the

-------
"second phase" is almost conclusive by itself.



6.   Increasing the calcination temperature of the three


different series 2061,  2062 and 2069 results in an increase

         i I I
in the Fe   9  except for the highest temperature in each

                              I | |
series - 3200°F.  Since the Fe    level in calcines seems


to be related  to the calcination temperature as a general
                           \

phenomena3  it  may be possible to utilize EPR to find the
                           \

optimum calcination temperature.   Most of the iron is
probably present as Fe  9  which is not observed by EPR in


these materials.
                            VI

-------
                     TABLE OF CONTENTS

                                                      Page

Management Summary                                      i

Abstract                                               ii

Summary of Findings                                   iii

I.        INTRODUCTION                                  1

II.       EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE-                        6

     A.   Samples                                       6
     B.   EPR Procedure                                 6
     C.   Ultraviolet-Visible Irradiation               6
          of Sample Type 11
     D.   Slaking Test                                 10

III.      EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS                         1.1

     A.   Carbonate Samples                            11
     B.   Calcined Samples                             15

IV.       DISCUSSION OF RESULTS                        25

     A.   Carbonate Samples                            25
     B.   Calcined Samples                             26
     C.   Slaking Test     .                            27
     D.   The Role of Fe    in the Calcines            27

V,        RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCIUSIGNS              28

References                                             30

APPENDIX A

APPENDIX B

APPENDIX C

-------
                LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES
Table

I

II

III


IV


Figure

  1
  5


  6


  7
Carbonate Samples

Calcined Samples

Calcined Samples,  Variable Temperature
Series

Regression Coefficients for EPR
Linewidths L to the Reaction Data
S02 Reactivity in Differential Test
Versus EPR Linewidth Parameter of
Selected Limestones.  Correlation
Coefficient is 0.55.

Sorption Capacity., Fixed Bed,, Versus
EPR Linewidth Parameter of Selected
Limestones. Correlation Coefficient is
0.49

S02 Reactivity in Differential Test
Versus EPR Linewidth Parameter of
Selected Calcines

Sorption Capacity, Fixed Bed,, Versus
EPR Linewidth Parameter of Selected
Calcines

Density Versus EPR Linewidth for Series
2061 Calcines

Effect of Calcination Temperature on Fe
Center in Calcines
Page

  7

  8


  9


 12
                                                       1.3
Relationship of Mn '  EPR Signal Intensities
to the Slaking Test Data
                                                       14
                                                       1.7
                                                       18
 19
 20
                                                       24
                            Vlll

-------
    ELECTRON PARAMAGNETIC RESONANCE (EPR)  INVESTIGATION
           OF LIMESTONES AND THEIR CALCINES AND
        CORRELATION WITH REACTIVITY WITH ACID GASES


I.   INTRODUCTION - PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF WORK

     Abatement of atmospheric pollution by sulfur dioxide

or hydrogen sulfide has received particular attention with

emphasis based on reactions of the pollutants with limestone.

The limestone wet scrubbing process, limestone fluidized

bed combustors and coal gasification are currently under

intensive investigation and development.  Limestones, dolomites

and their derivatives as naturally occurring substances show

a wide range of reaction rates as well as capacity for acid

gas sorption.

     Mechanistic and kinetic studies were initiated on the

dry injection process.  Borgwardt (Ref. 1,2)  has shown that

limestone absorbs S02 by a mechanism involving at least two

consecutive steps; (1) dissociation of  the calcium carbonate,(2)

followed by reaction of CaO with sulfur dioxide.  He suggested

(Ref.  1) that some reaction takes place within the interior

structure of the solid and that the relative importance of

the internal reaction becomes greater as the particle size

decreases.   He subsequently demonstrated (Ref. 2), that the

rate of sorption is limited by a first-order reaction which

occurs throughout the internal pore structure of small

particles.   There is a strong influence of physical properties

-------
upon the sorption of SO^.  Small pores and large surface
areas lead to high reaction rates while large pores lead to
high capacity.  Stones of varying geological type yield
calcines of distinctly different physical properties which
show correspondingly large differences in both rate of
reaction and total capacity for S02 sorption (Ref. 2).
Ishida,et al (Ref. 3) have shown that there is an unreactTtjd .
core, the size of which may depend on the particle size
(and porosity) of the particle itself.
     Murthi,et al (Ref. 4) have recently reported studies on
the SOj sorption capacity of limestones and dolomites as a
function of calcination time and temperature in the dry
injection process.  The role of surface area, porosity, and
chemical composition on the sorbent capacity was discussed.
The effect of moisture and of the presence of iron oxide in
the samples was also reported.
     Harvey (Ref. 5, 6) has carried out extensive studies of
the petrographic and mineralogical characteristics of carbonate
rocks related to sorption of sulfur oxides in flue gases~.
Detailed petrographic, mineralogical, and chemical analyses
of 26 carbonate rocks were made and compared with the capacity
(3-1/2 hr. reaction period) and differential reactivity
(120 sec. reaction period) of calcined specimens for sorption
of sulfur dioxide (802).  Three petrographic and chemical
properties appear to be useful indexes of the S02 sorption

-------
 capacity: the pore volume, the grain size, and the sodium
 oxide content of the rocks.  The larger the pore volume,
 the greater was the sorption capacity of the rock.  In
 general, the finer the grain size of the rock, the higher was
 the sorption capacity.  Of the chemical elements analyzed,
 only sodium showed a correlation trend with the SC^ test
 data.  The sodium present in the samples increased with
 increasing sorption capacity.  Unlike the sorption capacity
 tests, the differential reactivity tests showed little or no
 correlation with petrographic and chemical properties.
     Relatively high SO^ reactivity was observed for chalks,
 calcareous marls, and oolitic aragonite sand samples and is
 believed due mainly to the high pore volume and fine grain
 size of these carbonate rocks.
     Drehmel (Ref.  7)  reported studies of the chemical and
 physical properties of three series of calcined carbonates
 (two limestones and one dolomite) as they pertain to "dead-
 burning" in the dry injection process.   A high degree of
 intercorrelation was found between sulfur dioxide reactivities,
 surface area and pore  volume.
     Drehmel (Ref.  8)  has recently compared carbonate rock
 types as to their sulfur dioxide removal efficiencies in a
batch scrubber and  found the best types to be marl and
chalk and the worst marble and  magnesite.   For calcined
 limestone,  the change  in scrubbing efficiency with calcination
temperature was found  to be due to the resulting

-------
change in surface area or pore volume.  At higher temperatures
where surface area was lost, reactivity was lost.  The
variation in scrubbing efficiency with different calcined
limestone types was found to be a function of both the
surface area and pore volume.
     Much of the primary reactivity and capacity data
referred to in this report is also to be found in a recent
technical report issued by EPA (Ref. 9).
     The purposes of the present investigation of a selected
set of limestone and calcine samples by electron paramagnetic
resonance (EPR) spectroscopy were to (a) assist in the
characterization of marls and chalks to identify properties
which account for their high reactivity, (b)  establish a
semi-quantitative basis for evaluating a crystalline order of
limestones to predict their reactivity with acid gases,
(c) investigate the effect of altering the calcination
temperature on the crystalline structure of calcines in
order to identify these properties which account for the
varying reactivity and deadburning, and (d) investigate the
effects of slaking on the crystalline parameters of calcines
produced at different temperatures in order to support wet
limestone scrubbing process development.
     The theory of electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR)
spectroscopy and its application to the characterization of
solid-state materials are provided in Appendix A.

-------
Pure CaCO~ exhibits no EPR absorption,  unless the material
                                I I        I i 1
is irradiated.  However, both Mn   and  Fe   occur naturally


in limestones as substitutional ions for Ga    and thus act


as paramagnetic probes of the crystal structure.   It is


these probes which provide the basis of the  present investi-


gation.


     It is interesting to note that scientists in India

                                     I i
(Ref. 10) have suggested using the  Mn   concentration


determined by EPR techniques in calcium carbonate materials


as an aid to manganese ore prospecting  and also as an index


for establishing the relative ages  of samples belonging to

unclassified geological periods.

-------
II.  EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE
A.   Samples
     The polycrystalline carbonates and calcines which were
examined are listed in Tables I,  II and III.
B.   EPR Procedure
     The polycrystalline samples  were placed in Varian 9.5 GHz
quartz sample tubes, Si 3 mm ID and the tubes evacuated to a
pressure less than 50 microns.  The EPR spectra were obtained
at liquid nitrogen temperatures using a standard cold finger
dewar placed in the Varian Model V-4531 multipurpose cavity
operated at a microwave frequency of 2*9140 MHz.  Superhetero-
dyne detection and 400 Hz field modulation were employed.
The spectra were recorded on a Varian X-Y recorder using
the magnetic field as a base.  See Appendix A for a more
detailed discussion of EPR spectroscopy and its application
to solid-state materials.
C.   Ultraviolet-Visible Irradiation of Sample Type 11
     Ultraviolet-visible irradiation of the sample Type 11 in
a suprasil EPR tube under high vacuum (10   torr) was performed
utilizing unfiltered light from an Osram 500 watt point-
source lamp collimated with a four-inch diameter fused silica
lens (focal-length four inches).   The lens was placed at
approximately twice the focal length from the lamp providing
a one-to-one magnification of the point-source arc whose
image was entirely contained within the polycrystalline
sample area.  The irradiation was carried out for 63 hrs at
ambient temperatures outside the  dewar and cavity.  EPR
measurements at liquid nitrogen temperatures^ were carried
out immediately after the irradiation and again, one week later,

-------
                               TABLE I
                         CARBONATE SAMPLES*
IGS Type**
Type 1
Type 3

Type 4

Type 5

Type 6
Type 7

Type 8
Type 10
Type 1]***

Type 12


EPA Nomenclature
#2201
#2203

#2204

#2205

#2206
#2207

#2208
#1336
#2129
#2077
#2081
#2109
#2080
Size
150/170
150/170

150/170

150/170

150/170
Hand Ground

150/170
150/170
150/170
150/170
150/170
150/170
150/170
Description
Iceland spar, calcite
Limestone, coarse grained
high purity
Limestone, fine grained
high purity
Dolomite, reef type high
purity
Dolomite
Magnesite, fine grained
high purity
Aragonite
White crushed marble
Michigan marl
Austin chalk
Kansas chalk
New York marl
Northeastern Ohio marl
* Supplied by EPA and Described by Harvey
** Illinois Geological Survey nomenclature
*** Ultraviolet decoration performed

-------
                              TABLE II
                          CALCINED SAMPLES*
IGS EPA
Type Nomenclature
Type 1

Type 3

Type 4

Type 5

Type 6
Type 9
Type 10
Type 11

Type 12


#2201

#2203

#2204

#2205

#2206
#2209
#1336
#2129
#2077
#2081
#2109
#2080
Size
150/170
10/28
150/170

150/170

150/170

150/170

150/170
42/65
***
***
***
***
Calcination
Temperature
1700°F
1800°F**
1700°F

1700°F

1700°F

1700°F
1700°F
1700°F
1700°F
***
***
***
***
Description of the
Precuisor Carbonate
Iceland spar, cal-
cite
Limestone, coarse
grained, high purity
Limestone, fine
grained, high purity
Dolomite, reef type,
high purity
Dolomite
Dolomite
White crushed marble
Michigan marl
Austin chalk
Kansas chalk
New York marl
Northeastern marl
  * All samples prepared by EPA (2 hours at temperature)
 ** Contaminated with light-green colored material
*** Data unknown
                                  8

-------
                              TABLE III

           CALCINED SAMPLES*, VARIABLE TEMPERATURE SERIES
    EPA
Nomenclature
Size
Temperature,°F
Description
#2061




#2062




#2069



170/200 1700**
2000**
2300**
2600**
3200**
-170 1700**
2000**
2300
2600
3200**
-170 1700**
2000**
2300
3200**
Fredonia White Limestone




Cedar Bluff Limestone




James River Dolomite



 * Supplied by EPA

** Slaking Test Performed

-------
The sample was then exposed to air at atmospheric pressure
for one hour and then repumped to 10"  torr in order to
investigate the air-stability of the irradiation created
Fe44"1".
D.   Slaking Test
     Selected calcined samples listed in Table III were
placed on pyrex watch glasses and were investigated according
to the slaking test conceived by T.  D. Womble of T.V.A. and
used by EPA.  Since the samples had not been received  from
EPA sealed from the air, they were preheated at 650°C  for
three hours to dispel any absorption of atmospheric water.
After cooling to room temperature in a dessicator over
P2^5» water was added to the samples in the ratio 1 ml/g
sample or 5 ml/g sample and the samples then soaked for
times of 30, 60, or 120 minutes.   The wet samples were then
dried in an oven at 240°C for two hours,  after which they
were removed and again placed over Po°5 in a dessicator where
they cooled.  They were then reexamined for EPR absorption
at liquid nitrogen temperatures.
                            10

-------
III. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS

A.   Carbonate Samples

     1.   EPR Spectra

     The six main transitions characteristic (Ref. 11) of

Mn"1"1" are observed in all the carbonates except Type 7(magnesite) .

A well-resolved spectrum in Type 10 (marble) is shown in

Figure Bl of Appendix B*. Sample Type 11 (Michigan marl) exhibts more

poorly resolved Mn"1"*" transitions as is shown in Figure B2,

but also displays a center at g = 2.0029 which we attribute

to Fe"H~f(Ref. 12).  The limestones, chalks and marls all

exhibit similar, but not identical, spectra with the g-value

for Mn4"* = 2.0048.  Representative spectra are shown in

Appendix B.  Aragonite and the dolomites exhibit slightly

different spectra, which are also showi\ in Appendix B.
              I I I
The role of Fe    in the carbonates was not fully investi-

gated, but it was observed in samples Type 1, 8 and 11.

     2.   EPR Linewidth Analysis and Correlation With
          Chemical Reaction Data
     The highfield "line" of the six Mn"1""*" transitions was

chosen for linewidth analysis since it was the best resolved.

The theory and discussion of linewidth analysis is given in

Appendix A.
*  In the remainder of the text, Figures in Appendix B will
be designated Bn while Figures in the main text will be
designated by an integer n, as is the usual practice
                             11

-------
A least-squares linear regression analysis was done on

eight of the samples listed (Table I).  The two dolomites

were not included in the fitting as their variance from  the

set seemed to be significant and because the linewidths

may be affected by the presence of Kg"1"4" in the dolomite

structure.

     Three different EPR parameters were chosen and each

fitted to the reactivity and capacity data of Table  14 of

Reference 6.  The three parameters are designated  L-^, L2

and LO and are discussed in Appendix A.  The correlation

coefficients for the fitting of the linewidths to  the

reactivity and capacity data are  listed in Table IV.  The

data for L, are presented  in Figures  1 and 2.  The dolomite

data -"D"-have been circled to indicate that they  were not

used in the fitting.

                         TABLE IV

       REGRESSION COEFFICIENTS FOR EPR LINEWIDTHS  L
                   TO THE, REACTION DATA
Reaction data
reactivity
capacity
3.
0
0
Ll
.55
.49
Ultraviolet-Visible

0
0
L2
.20
.45
Irradiation of

0.
0.
L3
18
17
Sample Type



11
     The EPR  spectra of  the material before  and after
                             12

-------
    25
    20
o

o
o
CO
 CO
o
V)
    15
                                                    L
                                                    9
                                                                                           c
                                                                                           o
    10
o
LU
or
                                                            M
                                                            •
                                                                     L = LIMESTONE
                                                                     D = DOLOMITE
                                                                     S = MARBLE
                                                                     C = CHALK
                                                                     M = MARL
                  I            234567

                                       LINEWIDTH PARAMETER, GAUSS

            Figure I  S02  REACTIVITY IN  DIFFERENTIAL TESTS VERSUS EPR LINEWIDTH

                       PARAMETER OF SELECTED LIMESTONES.   CORRELATION COEFFICIENT  IS 0.55,

-------
    25 i—
   20
en
O
CM
O
•«s
Q_
•<
O
O
CO
   15
M
O
   10
                                                         L
                                                         O
                                                                     L = LIMESTONE
                                                                     D = DOLOMITE
                                                                     S = MARBLE
                                                                     C = CHALK
                                                                     M = MA.RL
                  I            23456

                                         LIKEVMDTH PARAMETER,  GAUSS

            Figure 2   SORPTION CAPACITY, FIXED BED, VERSUS  EPR LINEWIDTH  PARAMETER

                       OF SELECTED  LIMESTONES.  CORRELATION  COEFFICIENT IS 0.49.

-------
63 hrs. irradiation at ambient temperatures are shown in
                                       I I I
Figures B3 & B4,, respectively.  The Fe    is increased by

the irradiation and remained stable for more than a week

under high vacuum ( < 10"  torr).  Furthermore, the subse-

quent admission of air at atmospheric pressure to the

sample for one hour did not result in any reduction in

signal intensity.

B.   Calcined Samples

     1.   EPR Spectra
           I [
     Six Mn   transitions were observed in the calcines with

slightly different g-values (2.0069 for the calcites) and

splittings than are found in the carbonates.  A typical

spectrum in the 1700°F calcine of Type  1 (Iceland Spar

Calcite) is shown in Figure B5.  When Type 1 calcined at

!800°F_, a center at g = 2.0047, characteristic of Fe"f"i"i"

(Ref. 13) is also observed.  (The sample also exhibits

another strong line,, believed to be an impurity).  Aside

from the appearance of the Fe    in the 1800°F calcine

along two other significant differences exist between the

two calcines.   First,  closer examination of the two minor
                                 I I §
peaks flanking the place where Fe    is observed shows that

the peaks are  stronger in the 1700°F calcine (Figures B7 & B8)

Secondly, the  structure underlying each of the six main M

peaks is stronger and better resolved in the 1800°F cal-
                            15

-------
 cine.   The fifth-highest  main Mn   line  is  shown in (Figures

 B9 & BIO)  Type  1 was  the  only material for  which a  1700°F

 and  1800°F calcine was available for investigation.  However,

 the  other  1700°F  calcines showed the main Mn   transitions

 and  FeH ' was also observed in Type 3, 5, 6, 10  and  11.

     2.   EPR Linewidth Analysis

     The linewidth of the low field Mn*4" transition were

 measured for all  the samples in Table II and in Figures 3 and

 4  are  plotted against the reactivity and capacity data of

 Table  14  of Reference 6.  No regression analysis was

 attempted since the scatter is large,  but  the chalks did

 appear to have rather large linewidths, indicative of their

 'unconsolidated1  nature.

     3.   Variable Temperature Series

     The Series 2061 was examined for Mn    linewidth analysis

 for  the five different temperatures (See Table III).  While

 no correlation was apparent between the linewidths and the

 reactivity or capacity data, a significant relationship was

 found between the linewidth and the density data found in

 Table B2-2A of Reference 9.   The data is plotted in Figure 5.

 The  spectra of the 2061 series are shown in Figures Bll-15.

     One striking feature of the series is the variation of
       I I I
 the Fe    intensity as a function of temperature.  The

 signal heights of the Fe444" center normalized to those of the

Mn   peak immediately downfield are plotted versus calcination

 temperature in Figure 6.   A qualitative feature of  Series 2062
                              16

-------
    25
    20
01
    15
 CO
o
v>
    10
o
•<
UI
oc.
              • M
                s
L = LIMESTONE
D = DOLOMITE
S - MAP.BLE
C = CHALK
M = MARL
                                        LINEWIDTH PARAMETER, GAUSS


             Figure 3  S02 REACTIVITY IN  DIFFERENTIAL  TEST VERSUS EPR  LINEWIDTH

                        PARAMETER OF  SELECTED CALCINES.

-------
           25.	
          20
       o
       CM
          15
                     M
•00
          10
       o
       CO
             —   s s
          c
                                                                   L  LIMESTONE
                                                                   D  DOLOMITE
                                                                   S  MARBLE
                                                                   C  CHALK
                                                                   M  MARL
                        1234?

                                             LINEWIDTH PARAMETER. GAUSS

                  Figure  4  SORPTION CAPACITY,  FIXED BED,  VERSUS EPR LINEWIDTH

                             PARAMETER OF SELECTED LIMESTONES.

-------
    3.50
    3.UO
     3.30
o


en
z
o
     3.20
                                       1700
>-
I—

co
z

o
     3. 10
                                                                 2300
                                                        3200
     3.00
     2.90
                                                                     2600
                                                         I
                                                                              2000
                                                                               I
             O.I   0.2   0.3  0.4   0.5   0.6   0.7   0.8   0.9    1.0   I.I    1.2   1.3   I.U


                                    EPR  LINEWIDTH,  GAUSS


           Figure  5  DENSITY VERSUS EPR LINEWIDTH FOR SERIES 2061  CALCINES.
                                         19

-------
    5.0
    4.0
ce


|   3.0

CD
or
CO


LU


E  2.0


LU
    1.0
  0.0
                                              A
                                              O
 D



 O



 A
               8
                                                            A
                                                             i
                                                                        SAMPLE NO.

                                                                         O = 2061


                                                                         A=2062

                                                                         D = 2069
              1700
2000           2300           2600

       CALCINATION TEMPERATURE,  °F
3200
           Figure 6  EFFECT OF CALCINATION TEMPERATURE ON Fe~M~rCENTER IN CALCINES.

-------
aud 2069 are similar with the hard-burned sample (3200°F)

deviating significantly from a linear relationship.

     The spectra of the Fe1''  centers in the 2061 and 2062

calcines are similar but differ from what is observed in the

2069 series.  There appears  to be (at least) one other center
                                        I I I
overlapping the center  identified as Fe    substituted in the
  I i
Ca   lattice position.

     4.   Slaking Test

     The samples showed a weight loss on preheating at 650°C

and a weight gain after soaking and drying.   Different soaking

times and volumes were used  for the series 2061, 2062 and

2069 and the changes in weights are shown in Tables C-I,

C-II and C-III of Appendix C.   The results agree generally

with those of Drehmel (Ref.  7).  The EPR spectra of the

dry 1700°F, 2000°F, 2600°F and 3200°F calcines in Series

2061 which had been soaked with 1 ml of water for 60 minutes

are shown in Figures B16-19.  The spectra showed a "doubling"
             I i
of the six Mn   lines, indicating that a second site exists
      I [
for Mn   with hyperfine splittings larger by about 1.5% and

a down-fie Id shift in g-value.  The behavior of the 2061

series was similar for other  soaking times and volumes.  The

other series, 2062 and 2069  behaved in a similar manner.  Tte

spectra for a 5 ml, 120 min.  soak for the 1700°F 2061 calcine

is shown in Figure B20.  The  g-value for Mn4"1", which entirely
                            21

-------
is the second site, is equal to 2.0077.

     If, the second site is that associated with hydrated

CaO, then*

     hydrated site signal intensity    _ k  ' actual % Wt. gain
   non-hydrated site signal intensity        theoretical 70  -
                                             actual" % Wt, gain
          Concentration of a center oc Signal Height

               c = al

               c' = a'l'

where     c = concentration of non-hydrated CaO

          c '  = concentration of hydrated CaO

     _c '    _  70 wt, gain _ ______^
     c^+^z     theoretical maximum 70

     inverting

     1 ,  c  _ theoretical maximum %
         c     o wt. gain


     c  _ theoretical maximum 7o - °L wt. gain
     cT1"   70 wto gain                        '

     inverting,

     c' _ 7o wt. gain _      _
     c    theoretical maximum 70 - 70 wt. gain


     H = a   £— = k  £l
     I    T1"  c       c
     Ij. _ k % wt.     - _     _
     I      theoretical maximum 7o - 70 wt. gain
so that the plots of data taken from the spectra  (signal

intensity) and the Tables C-I, C-II and C-III  (slaking  test)
                             22

-------
should provide independent evidence of whether or not the

second site is in fact hydrated CaO.  The log-log plot of the

data for all experiments is provided in Figure 7, and the

slope is seen to be nearly equal to one.  Due to overlap of
      I I
the Mn   transitions in the two sites, the observed devia-

tions are to be expected.

     A cursory examination reveals that there does not
                                       I I I
appear to be any large change in the Fe    for the 2061 and

2062 series after slaking and drying.  However, the 2069

centers  increased greatly.
                             23

-------
IOOOO
 1000
                 Iml

             O - 30 mln
             O- 60 mln
                               5ml
                           •- 30 mln
                           • -60 mln

                           A-l20min
                                                                        A1700
  IO.O
U
I
LJ
O
UJ
o

Xv


I
UJ
•x.

UJ
z
O
UJ
a:
o
V
I
    1.0
                                                                    |700

                                                                    |700
                                                            '1700
                                                      Dl700
                                                          A1700
                                              A 3200
   O.I
                                                2000
                                             2600
                               320?
                                     • • 3200
                                 O3200
   OX>I
  000
                                      III
                                                   i  i I I ll
     O.Ol
                      O.I
                                       1.0

                                   ACTUAL WEIGHT GAIN
                                                        10.0
                                                                         100.0
                                                                                          1000.0
                              THEORETICAL- ACTUAL WEIGHT GAIN
       Figure  7  RELATIONSHIP OF  Mn

                   SLAKING  TEST DATA.
                                           *"1"
                                              EPR  SIGNAL  INTENSITIES TO THE

-------
 IV.  DISCUSSION OF RESULTS
 A.   Carbonate Samples
      The fitting of EPR linewidth data to the reactivity and
 capacity data resulted in correlations which in the best
 case (r = 0.55 and 0.49) were significant,  though not as
 high as we might have liked.   It is  interesting though,  that
 both the reactivity and capacity correlations were comparable.
 The other two parameters chosed  for  regression analysis,
 while poorer in result,  might  have been expected from
 the less accurate  determination  of the linewidths  in the
 case of L2 and Lj,  and from the  possibility  for overlap
 effects for L3 as well.   From  the qualitative observations
 that within a carbonate  type,  the sharper and better-resolved
   I I
 Mn   lines  occur for  the  more  reactive material, it  is
 believed that better  linewidth correlation might be  found
 within  any  carbonate  type.  Variations of the  inherent
 structure of  even a perfect lattice from carbonate type  to
 carbonate type might  account for a not- larger  correlation
 among all the  samples.
     The effect of ultraviolet-irradiation on Michigan Marl
 (Type 11, #2129) under high vacuum is remarkable.  Fe+4+ is
 increased in intensity without (presumably) a change in the
 surface area or pore volume.  The increase in Fe44"1" is main-
 tainable in air - i.e. stable.   This  implies that the decora-
 tion of the defect structure of carbonates may be investigated
by the creation of Fe^ by the photo-oxidation of Fe^ and
could prove to be as valuable  a probe  of  crystallinity as
the

                            25

-------
B.   Calcined Samples

     The two Type 1 Iceland Spar Calcines (1700°F and  1800°F)

exhibit considerably different external morphology and

capacity (Ref. 6).  In the Type 1 Iceland spar material,

the low capacity anisotropic 1700°F calcine with a high

degree of strain shows no Fe'''  center while the higher-
                                               I  I i
capacity isotropic 1800°F calcine yields the Fe    center.

Thus while Fe'''  seems to be an indicator of capacity, its

role is by no means clear at this time.  However, there are

two other EPR parameters which do indicate the. degree of

crystallinety of the materials.
                                        i i i
     The two minor peaks flanking the Fe    center are

essentially quantum-mechanically forbidden transitions

whose presence is enhanced by a departure from a cubic environ-

ment.   Thus, as  expected the minor peaks are more intense

in the 1700°F calcine.

     Furthermore, the structure under the six main Mn^"1" lines

is what is known as "fine structure" in spectroscopic  langu-

age and the better resolution and increase in intensity in

the 1800°F calcine is what is expeqted for a more perfect

lattice.   It would have been valuable if more of such "pairs"

of radically different materials were available for study.



     In the 2061 calcine series, the Mn4"4" linewidths did

prove  to correlate well with the density data.  The reactivity

and capacity data did not correlate with either the
                            26

-------
 linewidths  in the  calcines  of the various types of limestones, or

 with the density data  (Ref.  9).   Perhaps, these observations

 merely reflect that fact that reactivity depends on both  the

 density  and the  initial crystallinity, the  latter  to which

 EPR  is not sensitive.


 C.   Slaking Test

     The EPR results on the calcined samples after soaking and
                                                    _L_|_
 drying indicate  the presence of a second  site for Mn   which is

 most probably the hydrated oxide site. The relationship of the

 EPR  linewidth data to the slaking test data in Figure 7 is

 independent evidence of the assignment of the new EPR lines to
   I [^
 Mn   in hydrated sites.  The small shift  observed  for the  field

 positions of the "second phase" is almost conclusive by itself.
D.   The Role of Fe    in the Calcines
                 I i i
     Since the Fe    level in the three (unsoaked) series

seems to be related to the calcination temperature (Figure  6),

it may be possible to utilize EPR to find the optimum calcination

temperature.   Most of the iron is probably present as Fe"^",which

is not observed by EPR in these materials.

     The appearance of another signal in the 2069 series may be
         -i_,4-_i_                  * i
due to Fe    substituted in Mg   sites. This may not have any

bearing on the reactivity of the calcine,however. What is

interesting in this  series is the great increase in the

after soaking and drying. It is difficult to satisfactorily

rationalize.this observation.
                             27

-------
V.   RECOMMENDATIONS AND CQNCIUSIGNS

     The findings of the investigative effort are well

summarized at the beginning of this report and will not be

repeated here.  However, it is clear that some questions

remained unanswered and further research may be expected to

be fruitful.

     The correlation of EPR linewidths in all the carbonate

materials with reactivity and capacity (r = 0.55 and r = 0.49

respectively), does indicate that higher correlation may be

found within a carbonate type.  Thus further investigations

of a large number of samples for each carbonate type may

prove to be of value.

     The data show that in the 2061 temperature calcine
              i	i_
series, the Mn   linewidths did correlate extremely well

with the density data, though not with reactivity or capacity.

An attempt to correlate the density data for calcines of all
                                              I i
stone types ought to be done.  Although the Mn   EPR data

seem to be sensitive to the density determinant of reactivity,
                                                     I i i
and not to the initial crystallinity, photocreated Fe

might prove to be a surface defect and hence sensitive to

initial crystallinity.  The role of iron in the limestones

and their calcines was barely emphasized compared to the
  ++                              I I I
Mn   probe, and we believe that Fe    may turn out to be
                         j	i_
valuable  in ways that Mn   is not as a probe.  This is

indicated by the comparison of the 1700°F and 1800°F calcines
                            28

-------
of the Type 1 Iceland Spar material as well as by the

temperature series 2061S  2062 and 2069.  Decoration of the
                                           I I i         I I
defect state by UV-irradiation producing Fe    from Fe

ought to be pursued in both the limestones and their

calcines.

     The sensitivity of the EPR spectra to the degree, of

hydration in the calcines points to a very important poten-

tial use of EPR for investigating chemical reactions in

these materials.  One should be able to follow the convers-

ion of CaCOo to CaO to CaSO~ to CaSO,  and each species should

give distinguishable EPR spectra in a mixture  - even with

many reactions occurring simultaneously.  Since EPR spectros-

copy is an instantaneous measurement (£29000 "experiments"

per second) kinetic studies can be done on solid-gas and

solid-liquid reactions, as well as liquid-gas  reactions.
                     ^
The EPR investigations of the chemistry of the limestone and

calcine materials with S0~ should prove to be  a fruitful

area - in both dry injection and wet-scrubbing processes.
                             29

-------
                        REFERENCES

1.   R. H. Borgwardt,  Environmental Science and Technology
     4, 59 (1970).

2.   R. H. Borgwardt,  "Isothermal Reactivity of Selected
     Calcined Limestones with SOJ1, Paper presented at the
     International Dry Limestone Injection Process Symposium,
     Paducah, Kentucky, June 22-26, 1970.

3.   M. Ishida,  S.  C.  Wang,  C.  Y. Wen,  "Study of Rate of S02
     Absorption by an Agglomerated Single Sphere of Calcium
     Dioxide Powder" - preprint of paper, Journal or Confe-
     rence Source Unknown.

4.   K. S. Murthi,  D.  Morrison, and R.  K. Chan, Env. Sci. &
     Tech., 5, 776 (1971).

5.   R. D. Harvey,  Interim Report to the National Air Pollution
     Control Administration, Contract No. CPA-22-69-65,
     June 22, 1970.

6.   R. D. Harvey,  Final Report, Contract No. CPA 22-69-65,
     July 15, 1971.

7.   D. C. Drehtnel,  Am. Cer. Soc. Bull., 50, 666 (1971).

8.   D. C. Drehmel,  "Limestone  Types for Flue Gas Scrubbing",
     Paper presented at the  Second International Lime/Lime-
     stone Wet Scrubbing Symposium, New Orleans, Louisiana,
     November 8-12,  1971.

9.   R. H. Borgwardt,  D. C.  Drehmel, T. A. Kittelman, D. R.
     Mayfield and J.  S. Bowen,  "Alkaline Additives for Sulfur
     Dioxide Control".  Air  Pollution Technical Data
     Document 0737.

10.  P. K. Ghosh, M. Samaddar,  S. C. Sinha, J. S. Tiwari and
     A. C. Banerji,  Technology 2, No. 4, 276 (1970).


11.  C. Kikuchi  and  L. M.  Matarrese, J. Chem. Phys. 33
     601 (1960).                                 y   —'

12.  S. A. Marshall  and A. R.  Reinberg, Phys. Rev. 132. 134 (1963).

13.  A. J. Shuskus,  Phys.  Rev.  127. 1529 (1962).
                             30

-------
                   APPENDIX A
EPR THEORY AND APPLICATION TO  THE  CHARACTERIZATION
            OF SOLID-STATE MATERIALS

-------
 GENERAL THEORY

       Systems with unpa i r e d^ e 1 e c t ro ns exhibit a paramagnetism
which serves to identify them on the application of electron
paramagnetic resonance (EPR)  spectroscopy in a magnetic field.
This paramagnetism is due primarily to the spin angular
momentum of the unpaired electron (S = 1/2)  which can be
quantized in a magnetic field such that the projection of the
spin angular momentum along the axis of quantization (along
the magnetic field)  is S  -= ± 1/2.  For an isolated electron
in a magnetic field, the energy is described by the Hamiltonian

                                                         (1)

in which p is the Bohr magneton,  S is the spin angular momentum,
H is the magnetic field and g is  a second rank tensor.   For an
electron, in the absence of other perturbations,  the principal
values of the g tensor are equal  so that )f = 9>-pH«H and two
magnetic levels are  oossible  for  the electron:
                                               S   = + 1/2  .
                                   ^-^T
                            Energy 
-------
Transitions may be induced between these two levels by the



application of radiofrequency energies (usually X = 3cm at




3500 Gauss) such that
                 = hv - glpl|H|
(2)
It is principally this energy absorption which gives rise to



EPR spectroscopy,  In practice, the microwave source is held



constant and the magnetic field varied until absorption is



observed, contingent on the resonant condition in equation (2) .



     Of course in real systems, we do not have an isolated,



perturbation-free electron.   The unpaired electron may be



non-bonded,  but in an anion vacancy in a crystal lattice;  or



it may be an integral part of a molecular species such as



Mn*4", Fe44"*", H, N02,  02~,  Ti+3, Zn+1, Ag+2,  etc.   An isolated



electron has no orbital angular momentum and g is a function
of spin only and equal to 2.0023, but once the electron is



constrained to move within a molecular or crystalline frame-



work, a finite orbital angular momentum can result,  imparting



an additional paramagnetism to the electron such that g is



a function of both spin and orbital angular momentum.  In real



systems g can vary more than 10% from the free electron value.



As examination of equation (2) will show, systems with different



g-values will give rise to spectra at different magnetic



fields.  Another distinguishing feature is the interaction of



the unpaired electron with magnetic nuclei in the same species;



e.g. the unpaired electron interacts with the manganese nucleus
                            2-A

-------
in Mn4"1", with the nitrogen nucleus in N02,  with protons in


H  OH, C.H.-, and with C13 in natural abundance in organic
 '   '  D _> '

compounds.


     When magnetic nuclei are present the energy is best


described by



                                tI                      (3)
in which I.  is the nuclear spin of the ith nucleus and A^ is


the second rank hyperfine interaction tensor.   The magnetic


nuclei in effect "split" the EPR transitions in characteristic


ways so that molecular structure determinations can be made.


For example  the  nuclear spin of magnanese is 5/2 and thus

                                   1 _ L
each electron spin transition in Mn   is split into six


components,  giving a six line spectrum.


     For a particular paramagnetic species there are definite


values for g and A.  which distinguish not only the species


but also the symmetry of the species.  For example it is


possible to  distinguish 02~ on the surface of ZnO from 09~


in the crystal lattice.


     EPR and optical spectroscopy serve to complement one


another in solid state studies.  The  curve under the EPR


absorption curve is  proportional to both the concentration


and the total amount of absorbing centers, and hence EPR does
                            3-A

-------
not follow Beer's Law as is the case with optical absorption.



The EPR transition probability (related to the extinction



coefficient) is essentially the same for the unpaired electron,



regardless of the environment.  Thus quantitative determination



of an unidentified paramagnetic species can be easily made by



comparison with a known standard.  This is certainly not the



case with optical investigations.  Furthermore, because the



magnetic environment of different species is different, the



transitions for each species are distinguishable in a mixture



of paramagnetic molecules which may not be the case for optical



investigations in which there can be considerable overlap of



absorption or reflection.  The sensitivity of the method is



very high, 10   spins or molecules is the usual minimally



detectable limit for each species.  For a usual sample size of


    3                        - n
1 cm s this represents 2 x 10    moles.



     EPR is a non-destructive technique, a physical measure-



ment not affecting the concentration of nature of the



species.  In optical investigations this may not be the case



since (especially ultra-violet)  light can actually produce



additional absorbing centers.  Thus the comparison of EPR



and optical investigations can serve to detect the effects



of optical irradiation on solid-state materials.  In fact,



the effects of optical irradiation on solid-state material



can be determined by simultaneously observing the EPR and



optically irradiating the material in the same EPR sample



cell.
                            4-A

-------
       Reflectance spectroscopy on poly-crystalline material
 has been demonstrated to yield the absorption coefficient, but
 the studies are sometimes complicated by scattering, internal
 reflection, and particulate size effects.  The problem of
 optical centers on the surface, in contradistinction to the
 bulk of the material, can be a complex one, one which EPR
 studies may clarify since the technique is so sensitive to
 small changes in magnetic environment and symmetry.  EPR is
 particularly useful in resolving optical spectra in which
 there is a great deal of overlap of structurally similar or
 dissimilar species.
       The species in their natural states to which EPR
 techniques may be applied are generally limited to natural
 paramagnetic defects in solids, a few stable free-radicals
 (such as NC^) ,  and compounds of transition metals and rare
 earths.  However,  almost any solid material can be rendered
 paramagnetic by several techniques:  (1)  ^-irradiation, which
 is widely utilized to decorate the defect state of solid-state
material,  (2)  ultra-violet irradiation which can ionize snecies
 to become paramagnetic, (3)  thermal ionization for low energy
processes,  (4)  paramagnetic creation of a photo-excited
paramagnetic triplet state,  and (5)  doping the solid with
paramagnetic ions.
                            5-A

-------
 LINEWIDTH ANALYSIS
      The  highfield "line" of the six MrT^ transitions was
 chosen  for  linewidth analysis since it was the best resolved.
 Under high  resolution the "line" is rather complex and  a
 typical spectra  (Type 3) is shown in Figure Al.  The "line"
 is  the  first derivative of the EPR absorption of a random
 selection of crystallites - i.e. a powder spectra.  The
 EPR transitions  in each "line" fall into two groups, each
 characterized by a maximum absorption' which is understandable
 in  terms  of (1)  the way the transitions for the random
 orientations vary in intensity at different directions  in
 the  crystalline  lattice and (2) the number of systems
 absorbing at each orientation.  The theory is complex,though
 understood,and we will not repeat it here.  Suffice it  to
 say,  the  two groups are observable  in Figure Al and are
 designated A arid B.  The less perfect the lattice, the
 broader the EPR absorption (and first derivative) of each
 group will be.
     Three different  EPR parameters were  chosen  and each
fitted to  the  reactivity and  capacity data of Table 14   of
Reference  6.  The. three parameters  are  designated L, ,  L* and
L~ in Figure Al.  L,  and L«  are,  in  effect,  the horizontal
distance (in magnetic field)  between second derivative
maximum and minimum points  for the  least-overlapped portion
of each of the absorption groups.   L~ is  a measure of the
horizontal distance (in field)  between the maximum absorption
and the half-height.   Both measures are usecl in  linewidth analysis*

                            6-A

-------
Figure Al: EPR  SPECTRA  OF  HIGH-FIELD
           Mn"1"1" TRANSITION IN SAMPLE
           TYPE 3,  #2203.
                               7-A

-------
APPENDIX B



EPR SPECTRA

-------
I
ca
                                                                   "mic = 91*0.3 MHz
                                                             73.7G-*j
              Figure  Bl:  EPR AT »77°K OF  SAMPLE 1336, WHITE  CRUSHED MARBLE, MODULATION - 0.52G

-------
N3
I
03
          Figure B2:   EPR AT K 77°K OF SAMPLE 2129, MICHIGAN MARL, MODULATION - 0.52G

-------
                                   U	 87.2 G 	»|
                                                              = 2.0029
mic
   = 9|i|l.t; MHz
Figure  B3:  EPR SPECTRUM AT ^77°K OF TYPE 11, #2129,  BEFORE U.V.-IRRADIATION, MODULATION - 0.40G

-------
                                                        mjc= 9111.1  MHz
Figure B4:  EPR  SPECTRUM AT ^ 77°K OF TYPE 11, #2129, AFTER  63  HRS-
            U.V.-IRRADIATION,  MODULATION - 0.39G

-------
Ul
I
03
                                                                 l'mic=  9110.5 MHz
           Figure B5:  EPR SPECTRUM AT  & 77°K OF TYPE 1, #2201,  1700°F CALCINE, MODULATION - 0.40G

-------
I
W
           Figure B6: EPR SPECTRUM AT  #77°K OF TYPE  1, #2201,  1800°F  CALCINE,  MODULATION - 0.39G

-------
                                                   MHz
Figure B7:  EPR SPECTRUM AT ~77°K OF TYPE 1, #2201,
            1700°F CALCINE, MODULATION - 1.59G.
                          7-B

-------
                                       = 9IU2.9 MHz
Figure B8:  EPR SPECTRUM AT  » 77°K OF TYPE 1, #2201,
            1800°F CALCINE,  MODULATION - 1.60G.
                        8-B

-------
    7.5G.
                                         >'(nic=9m0.5 MHz
Figure B9:   EPR SPECTRUM AT  »77°K OF  TYPE 1, #2201,
             1700°F CALCINE, MODULATION -  0.39G.
                         9-B

-------
                                                             MHz
                                                    7.5G.
Figure BIO:  EPR  SPECTRUM AT »77°K OF
             TYPE  1, #2201,  1800°F
             CALCINE, MODULATION -
             0.40G.
                                         10-B

-------
I
03
                                                 = 2.0046
                                                    73.7G-H
                                                                    H
v . -
 mic = 9110.3 MHz
         Figure Bll:  EPR AT  »77°K OF SAMPLE #2061  CALCINED AT 1700°F, MODULATION - 0.52G

-------
NJ



03
                                                    73.7G-*|
                                                                                 -3 MHz
           Figure B12:   EPR  AT «77°K OF SAMPLE #2061  CALCINED AT 2000°F, MODULATION  -  0.52G

-------
u>
I
                                                                                       MHz
          Figure B13:   EPR AT «77°K OF  SAMPLE  #2061  CALCINED AT  2300°F, MODULATION  -  0.52G

-------
                                       -73.7G-*]
= 9l39.7 MHz
Figure B14:  EPR AT  ^77°K OF SAMPLE #2061 CALCINED AT 2600°F, MODULATION -  0.52G

-------
                                         73.7G—I
                                                                ^mic=9l38. I MHz
Figure B15:  EPR AT  ^77°K OF  SAMPLE #2061 CALCINED AT 3200°F, MODULATION -  0.52G

-------
                                             75.9G
Figure B16:
EPR SPECTRUM AT « 77°K OF 1700°F #2061 CALCINED, AFTER 1 ML,
60 MIN SLAKING TEST, MODULATION - 0.45G

-------
-J
Cd
           Figure B17:
EPR SPECTRUM AT « 77°K OF 2000°F 2061 CALCINE, AFTER 1 ML,
60 MIN SLAKING TEST, MODULATION - 0.45G

-------
Figure B18:
EPR SPECTRUM AT »77°K OF 2600°F 2061 CALCINE,  AFTER 1 ML,
60 MIN SLAKING TEST, MODULATION - 0.45G

-------
vo
I
OS
         Figure B19:
EPR SPECTRUM AT »77°K OF 3200°F 2061 CALCINE, AFTER 1 ML,
60 MIN SLAKING TEST, MODULATION - 0.45G

-------
NJ
O
I
03
                                                U—76.56 —»|
                                               H

                                               V
                                                                        mic
= 91^3.6 MHz
          Figure  B20:
EPR AT »77°K OF  1700°F 2061 CALCINE AFTER 5  ML,
120 MIN SLAKING TEST,  MODULATION - 0.40G

-------
N3
I—1

S3
                  Figure B-21  EPR AT^77°K OF SAMPLE 2203, LIMESTONE (COARSE), MODULATION -  0.52G

-------
fo
ro
i
C3
                                                    [-1	73.7 G-~)
"mic= 8I40-9 MHZ
                 Figure B-22   EPR AT«77°K OF  SAMPLE 2077, AUSTIN CHALK, MODULATION - 0.52G

-------
N3
U>
I
                                                                                    MHz
                  Figure B-23   EPR  AT  «770K OF SAMPLE 2081, KANSAS CHALK, MODULATION - 0.52G

-------
                                                          = 9137-8 MHz
Figure B-24   EPR AT -^-77°K OF SAMPLE 2206, DOLOMITE, MODULATION  -  0.52G

-------
Ul
I
tXJ
                  Figure B-25   EPR AT ^ 77°K OF SAMPLE 2208, ARAGONITE, MODULATION - 0.5.2G

-------
   APPENDIX C



SLAKING TEST DATA

-------
                                      TABLE C-I
o
                           SERIES 2061 (170/200) SLAKING TEST
                        (Percent Weight Gain For A 1 Gram Sample)
Calcination
Temperature
1700°F
2000°F
2300°F
2600°F
3200°F
% Wt. loss
on heating
at 650°C
6.5%
3.5
2.0
5.1
1.4
Soaking Volume
30Min 60Min
30.4 28.5
-
-
21.5
9.9 11.4
1ml
120Min
30.1
24.2
-
-
13.6
Soaking
30Min
32.8
-
-
-
14.2
Vo lume
60Min
32.8
-
-
-
15.9
5ml
120Min
32.4
-
-
-
22.8

-------
                             TABLE C-II
               SERIES 2062 (-170 SIZING) SLAKING TEST
              (Percent Weight Gain For A 1 Gram Sample)
Calcination
Temperature
% Wt. loss
on heating
 at 650°C
   Soaking Volume 1ml
60Min               120Min
  1700°F
  2000°F
  2300°F
  2600°F
  3200°F
  3.4%
  8.3
  3.9
  3.4
  1.6
28.1
27.0
22.6
21.4
12.6
28.7
28.2
14.7
                                  2-C

-------
                             TABLE C-III
               SERIES 2069 (-170 SIZING) SLAKING TEST
              (Percent Weight Gain For A 1 Gram Sample)
Calcination
Temperature
% Wt. loss
on heating
 at 650°C
   Soaking Volume 1ml
60Min               120Min
  1700°F
  2000°F
  2300°F
  3200°F
  3.3%
  3.7
  2.0
  4.0
16.1
10.5
11.0
 5.3
16.2
 5.3
                                  3-C

-------
                     DISTRIBUTION LIST


No. of Copies       	Recipient
     1              Environmental  Protection  Agency
                    411 West  Chapel Hill  Street
                    Durham, North  Carolina  27701
                    Attn:  M.  P.  Hunneycutt
                          Contracting  Officer

   7 & 1            Air Pollution  Control Office, EPA
reproducible        Office of Technical Information  &
                      Publications
                    Post Office  Box 12055
                    Research  Triangle  Park, North Carolina

    42              Environmental  Protection  Agency
                    411 West  Chapel Hill  Street
                    Durham, North  Carolina  27701
                    Attn:  Dennis C.  Drehmel
                          Project  Officer

-------