COMMUNITY WATER SUPPLY STUDY
Analysis of National Survey Findings
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE
Public Health Service
Environmental Health Service
Bureau of Water Hygiene
-------
800R70013
COMMUNITY WATER SUPPLY STUDY
ANALYSIS OF NATIONAL SURVEY FINDINGS
Bureau of Water Hygiene
Environmental Health Service
U.S. Public Health Service
Department of Health, Education and Welfare
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS i
RECOMMENDATIONS 1x
INTRODUCTION ,. . 1
SCOPE 3
Systems Studied 3
Study Areas 4
EVALUATION CRITERIA 12
Water Quality Criteria 12
Facilities Criteria , 15
Bacteriological Surveillance Program Criteria 15
METHODS 16
Field Survey 16
Sampling Program ,... 16
Laboratory Procedures , 19
Bacteri ological 19
Chemi cal 20
RESULTS 22
Study Sample..... 22
Water Quality - Influence of Source and
Community Size , 23
Facilities Evaluation - Influence of Source
and Community Size 26
Source Protection 26
Disinfection 28
Cl arification , 28
Distribution System Pressure ,,, 30
Bacteriological Surveillance Programs Evaluation -
Influence of Source and Community Size , 30
-------
DISCUSSION OF RESULTS 35
Quality of Source Water 35
Surface Water 35
Ground Water 40
Quality of Distributed Water 41
Overall Water Quality 41
Coliform Organism Densities 45
Fluorides. 54
Organics 55
Control of Health Hazards 56
Cross-Connection Control 57
Surveillance 61
Operator Experience and Training 63
Effect of Size on Operation and Water Quality 66
PARTICIPANTS 68
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 70
APPENDICES 71
Forms Used in the Study 72
Water Supply Systems Studied 86
Vermont. 86
New York, N.Y 91
Charleston, W. Va 96
Charleston, S. C 97
Cincinnati, Ohio, Kentucky, Indiana 98
Kansas City, Missouri, Kansas 100
New Orleans, Louisiana 102
Pueblo, Colorado 103
San Bernardino, Riverside, Ontario, Calif 104
Glossary of Terms 110
-------
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
To investigate public water supply systems in the United
States, the Bureau of Water Hygiene, Environmental Health Service,
of the Public Health Service, with the cooperation of state and
local health departments, and water utilities, conducted a
nationwide Community Water Supply Study (CWSS) during 1969 in
eight geographically distributed Standard Metropolitan Statistical
Areas and the State of Vermont. The study included 969
water supply systems serving about 18.2 million people (see
page 6 for population distribution by size) and was designed
to assess: A) the status of drinking water quality, B) water
supply system facilities, and C) bacteriological surveillance
programs in urban and suburban areas in nine regions of the
country.
The following are the principal findings of the study:
A. DRINKING WATER QUALITY
1. To determine the quality of the drinking water in
the 969 communities studied, samples were taken at various
places in the distribution systems. The data were averaged
for each system and constituent concentrations compared to
bacteriological, chemical, and physical constituent limits of
the 1962 U.S. Public Health Service Drinking Water Standards
(DWS). On this basis:
a) Only 59 percent of the systems delivered drinking
water that met the Drinking Water Standards.
b) Additionally, 25 percent of the systems delivered
drinking water that exceeded at least one of the DWS
"recommended limits" (defined on page 13) but did
not.exceed any of the DWS "mandatory limits" (defined
on page 14).
c) Finally, 16 percent of the systems delivered drinking
water that exceeded one or more of the DWS mandatory limits.
-------
11
2. The smaller systems had more difficulty 1n delivering
water with satisfactory quality than the larger systems. As
shown in the summary table below, this was particularly true
of the many systems serving less than 500 people.
SUMMARY OF WATER QUALITY EVALUATION
Population Group Served
Less
Than
500
500-
100,000
Greater
Than
100,000
All
Populations
Number of Systems
Evaluation of Systems:
Met Drinking Water
Standards
Exceeded recommended
limits
Exceeded mandatory
11 mi ts
446
501 22
Percent of Systems
969
SO
26
24
67
23
11
73
2?
59
25
16
Note:
Study Population
in each Group in
Thousands
88
4,652
13,463
18,203
3. While 572 systems (59 percent of the study total)
delivered water with a quality on the average that met the DWS, .
people do not drink the average water, they drink from a specific
tap in their home where the water quality is sometimes adversely
affected by household plumbing. To determine the quality of
water used, 2,595 individual samples were taken throughout
the study areas at a consumer's tap, which were essentially
glasses of drinking water; 930 (36 percent) of these contained
one or more constituents with a concentration that exceeded
the DWS limits. Each tap sample in the study had a population
equivalent equal to the community population divided by the
number of distribution samples taken from that community. On
this basis, 2.9 million people, 16 percent of the study
-------
i 11
population, were being served water from a tap containing
substances that exceeded at least one DWS limit. Five per-
cent of the study population were served water from a tap
containing substances that exceeded at least one mandatory
DWS limit.
4. Eighty-three (69 percent) of the 120 water supply
systems that exceeded the coliform organism density limit,
which indicated disease potential, were from poorly protected
and/or inadequately treated spring and well sources. Addi-
tionally, 108 of these 120 systems (90 percent) that exceeded
the coliform density limit served a population of 5,000 or less.
The study included 761 of these size systems serving a total
of 693,000 people, 3.8 percent of the study population. Finally,
79 of these 120 systems (66 percent) exceeding the coliform
density limit were located in the State of Vermont where disin-
fection was not frequently practiced or was inadequate.
5. Of the 496 water supply systems using well sources,
43 percent exceeded the DWS limits. This was caused by the
relatively high occurrence of iron, manganese, fluoride, total
dissolved solids, and nitrates. Most of the high nitrates
originated in ground water systems in California. The supplies
that exceeded the optimum fluoride range were mainly small, but
they are scattered throughout several regions.
<°
6. Certain constituent limits were exceeded more often
than others, but based on an average of all samples from each
system, the principal ones were:
No. of Systems From No. of Systems
on average Mandatory on Average
From Recommended List
Iron
Total Dissolved Solids
Manganese
Fl uoride
Sulfate
Nitrate
Exceeding Limit
96
95
90
52
25
19
List
Col iform
Organisms
Fluoride
Lead
Exceeding Limit
120
24
14
From a total of 969 systems
-------
iv
7. One of the most common consumer complaints reported
by the operators was from tastes and odors. Because no practi-
cay way exists to conduct odor tests on shipped samples, there
was no effective method to quantify such Information during this
survey. Therefore, techniques should be developed for Identify-
ing and measuring organics and other substances that cause tastes
and odors. This would also permit the improvement of treatment
processes to remove these materials.
8. Techniques for collecting and measuring low concen-
trations of specific toxic organics, as well as those that cause
tastes and odors, are inadequate, but the semi-quantitative
carbon chloroform extract (CCE) method does allow for the general
characterization of some organics 1n water so it was used on
94 surface supplies. Eleven percent of these supplies exceeded
the recommended limit of 200 yg/1 .
B. WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM FACILITIES
1. To determine the status of the facilities used to
treat, distribute, and store public drinking water, site surveys
and interviews with operators were conducted regarding the water
supply system. Based on this information, 44 percent did not
have any "major deficiencies" (see page 15), while 56 percent
were deficient in one or more of the following: source protec-
tion, disinfection and/or control of disinfection, clarification
(removal of suspended matter) and/or control of clarification,
and pressure in the distribution system.
2. The data in the summary table below indicates that
small systems have more facility deficiencies than the larger
ones, but all sizes of systems have some improvements to make.
-------
Population Group Served
Less Greater
Than 500- Than
500 100,000 100.000
All
Populatlons
Number of Systems:446
No major
deficiencies 39
Some major
deficiencies 61
501 22 969
Percent of Systems
47
53
64
36
44
56
3. Of the 80 spring and 37 combination spring-well
sources where no disinfection was practiced 40 percent were
poorly protected. This problem occurred mainly in towns under
a population of 500 and particularly in the State of Vermont.
This is one of the 5 study areas that reported some waterborne
disease outbreaks in recent years.
4. Disinfection was found inadequate in 17 percent of
the towns with populations under 25,000 people. Overall,
155 systems (16 percent of the study total) failed to disinfect
properly. Where a chlorine residual was maintained in the
distribution system, virtually no coliform indicator organisms
were found.
5. Three out of the 22 systems serving over 100,000
population did not have adequate clarification.
6. Inadequate pressure (<20 psi) in the distribution
system was found in 32 percent of the 446 systems serving under
500 people. Relatively limited areas of low pressure were
also reported in 32 percent of the 38 cities over 50,000
population.
-------
vi
7. Of the 969 water supply systems, only 104 had an
optimum range of fluoride concentration from either natural or
man-fed sources. Three systems of the 52 that exceeded the
optimum range of fluoride attempted to defluoridate, and only
one of those was successful.
C. BACTERIOLOGICAL SURVEILLANCE PROGRAMS
1. To determine the status of the bacteriological
surveillance program over each water supply system investigated,
records in the state and county health departments were examined
for the number of bacteriological samples taken and their
results during the previous 12 months of record. Based on
this information, only 10 percent had bacteriological surveillance
programs that met the "criteria" (see page 15), while 90 percent
either did not collect sufficient samples, or collected samples
that showed poor bacterial quality, or both.
2. The data on the adequacy of the Health Department
bacteriological surveillance programs related to system size
are summarized below and indicate that in all population
groups there was a gross failure to meet the sampling criteria.
This was particularly true for smaller systems.
Population Group Served
Less Greater
Than 500- than All
500 100.000 100.000 Populations
Number of Systems: 446 501 22 969
Percent of Systems
Met criteria 4: 15 36 10
Did not meet 96 85 64 90
criteria
-------
VI 1
3. Insufficient samples were taken in more than one
of the previous 12 months of record from 827 systems (85
percent of the study total).
4. Even considering a sampling rate reduced by 50
percent of that called for in the criteria, 670 systems (69
percent of the study total) still would not have collected
sufficient samples.
5. Analysis of the bacteriological data records for
those systems that did some sampling during the previous year
of record, revealed that 48 percent exceeded the coliform
density limit* at least one of the previous 12 months of record
D. OTHER MAJOR FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
1. To determine the status of the^ programs to control
health hazards^ data were collected on the date of the previous
sanitary survey and the status of the cross-connection control
program. This information indicated:
a. The personnel operating the systems reported a
sanitary survey was made within the.last three years
in only 36 percent of the communities, while the
personnel at 56 percent of the systems said either they
did not know when the last sanitary survey was
made or that one was never made by state or local health
departments.
b. Cross-connection prevention ordinances, and
re-inspection of existing construction were lacking in
54 and 89 percent respectively of the water supply
systems studied.
*As defined in Drinking Water Standards, p. 5 and 6.
-------
viii
2. To determine the adequacy of personnel and their
training, each operator was asked a series of questions about
the staff. This type of Inquiry produced the following main
points:
a. Sixty-one percent of the operators had not
received any water treatment training at a short-
school level or higher.
b. Seventy-seven percent of the operators were deficient
in training for microbiological work and 46 percent
of those who needed chemistry training did not have any.
c. Many of the operators are only part-time employees
and their salaries are very low. Only 29 percent of the
full-time operators earn more than $7,500 per year,
so lack of compensation has much to do with poor
employee retention and questionable operation.
3. Size of community or system influences the quality
of water delivered. Survey data also indicates that the smaller
systems have greater problems with quality control, retention
of qualified operators, maintenance of facilities and participation
in bacteriological surveillance programs. Thus it may be very
difficult to operate a small water system properly with the
complex problems that now exist.
-------
ix
RECOMMENDATIONS
The results of the Community Water Supply Study lead
to eleven specific recommendations:
1. The presence of coliform organisms at a level
above the DWS limit in 120 systems indicates that better source
protection and/or disinfection should be instituted as soon
as possible. State or local regulatdry agencies should
establish a policy of mandatory disinfection unless they can
provide technical assistance to assure adequate protection
of ground water sources. Further laboratory and field testing
should be conducted to determine the source of the contamination
and the degree of chlorination or other disinfection necessary
to control microbial forms throughout the distribution system
without creating chlorinous tastes. More research should be
done on determining the influence of residual organics on the
development of tastes and organism regrowth in the distribution
system.
2. The water utility should be responsible for water
quality control, but the bacteriological surveillance collection
requirements seem to be beyond the capability of most small
water systems. A more practical technique must be developed
if the public's health is to be protected. If all systems
were chlorinated, a residual chlorine determination might be
a more practical way of characterizing safety. Chlorine
residual should be performed in the field whenever a
bacteriological sample is collected, because it gives an
immediate indication of safety. Eventually, an inexpensive
continuous monitor should be developed and installed at the end
of the system to reflect safeness at those weak points.
-------
3. Because a consumer may reject a safe water 1f Its
appearance or taste 1s unsatisfactory, the many utilities
with such constituents as Iron, manganese, hydrogen sulflde,
color, turbidity, algae and macroscopic organisms in their
water should make every effort to use available treatment
technology to reduce them. This could include such practices
as mixing of raw water reservoirs, aeration, a*id/or coagulation
and filtration. Further research 1s necessary to understand
what causes these problems as well as how to more effectively
remove objectionable constituents.
4. Inasmuch as tastes and odors remain a common
complaint in public water supplies, more effort should be
made to employ the present technology of oxidation and
adsorption to control or remove these troublesome constituents.
Further research is needed to reduce the cost of such treatment
to make it more practical and acceptable. Better analytical
procedures are needed to tailor the treatment to solve a
specific problem. These analytical methods for organlcs would
be valuable to toxicologlsts in determining the health effects
of specific compounds as well as the general organlcs found
in the water.
5. The frequency of high fluoride and nitrate
concentrations indicates available technology for removal 1s
not being employed, thus additional engineering research
should be conducted to simplify and lower the cost of reducing
the concentrations of these and other inorganics, especially
from small systems. Simpler and cheaper continuous feeders
and monitors should also be developed for fluorides. Where
mandatory constituent limits are exceeded, present technology
must be applied, because in no case 1s the cost completely
prohibitive.
-------
XI
6. This study demonstrated a deterioration in quality
after water left the treatment plant. The reason why trace
metals and corrosion products continue to be present in tap
water, in spite of efforts to prevent this corrosion, should
be investigated. A continuous monitor for these constituents
needs to be developed to determine more specifically where
the problem originates. When the cause and effect relationship
has been established, then corrective action can be taken.
7. Some of the drinking water standards were
established with meager data on health effects. The CWSS
results afford for the first time extensive data on drinking
water quality at the consumer's tap and these data should be
used for correlation studies with available health indices
to see if the standards are adequate. Epidemiological field
studies should be conducted in problem areas uncovered by the
CWSS. Chemical data from the study should be used to estimate
the portion of total body burden that is contributed by drinking
water. High nitrates occurred in several supplies and
examinations of exposed populations should be undertaken. The
study, of course, only covered items in the Drinking Water
Standards and data are not available on other contaminants
of drinking water such as mercury, molybdenum and lithium.
8. Hazardous low-pressure (<20 psi) areas were found
in many water systems primarily because of deficient pumping,
storage, and distribution facilities. Pressure should therefore
be monitored at strategic locations in the system and the
system improved by installing adequate pumps, reservoirs, and
generally strengthening the distribution network to handle
peak fire or hot-weather demands. Such a program, along with
the installation of backflow prevention devices at the service
connection, should minimize the dangers from unfound cross-
connections .
-------
xii
9. Because the oneitime survey provided by the CWSS
has resulted in improvements in some water supply systems
ranging from the removal of a few feet of lead service pipe to
establishment of a state water supply program, expanded state
and local surveillance programs would continue to upgrade water
supply systems. On a national basis, an estimated 14-million
dollar increase in State programs is needed to conduct the
recommended water system inspection, sampling, bacteriological
and chemical analyses, and to provide technical assistance
to the individual utility operator. Additional money would
be needed to conduct formal training of operators.
10. Almost two-thirds of the operators have had no
special water technology training. Further, a substantial
need exists for additional staff to provide expanded programs
for quality control. Therefore, the existing training programs
of the utility, state, and federal groups should be enlarged
considerably to provide better skilled operators particularly
for the smaller systems.
11. The frequent occurrence of water quality problems
and faci1itydeficiencies in small systems, makes consolidation
or regionalization of services of some systems advisable.
In the metropolitan areas studied many smaller systems are
mixed in with the larger systems and their merger would seem
feasible where institutional arrangements will permit. Long-
range regional planning should help overcome some of the
current barriers to consolidation and may even prevent the
continuation of small system proliferation. Merging would
reduce the cost and improve the quality of the water delivered.
As an initial effort, surveillance services and technical
assistance could be provided by one group for several separate
systems. Preliminary to complete consolidation, an attempt,
at least, should be made to provide high quality treated
water to scattered, but nearby towns.
-------
INTRODUCTION
The purpose of the Community Water Supply Study (CWSS)
was to determine if the American consumer's drinking water
met the Drinking Water Standards.* To obtain nationwide
coverage, the Bureau of Water Hygiene of the U. S. Public
Health Service Initiated the CWSS in February of 1969 in
nine areas across the country. The field work for the CWSS
was conducted by the Bureau of Water Hygiene, in cooperation
with the state and local health departments of the water
utilities.
This study was designed to give an assessment of drink-
ing water quality, water supply systems, and surveillance
programs in urban and suburban areas in each of the nine
regions of the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.
These areas were selected to give examples of the several
types of water supplies in the country. A whole Standard
Metropolitan Statistical Area (SMSA) was the basis of each
study, except in Region I where the entire State of Vermont
was included, with evaluations made on all public water supply
systems, as defined herein, in each study area. This coverage
allowed an assessment of the drinking water quality of the
large central city, the suburbs, and the smaller communities
located in the counties in the SMSA, and the Interaction
between them.
Specifically, the objectives of this study were accom-
plished by determining whether or not:
1. The quality of the urban and suburban American
consumer's drinking water in the selected study
areas exceeded the Constituent Limits of the
Drinking Water Standards (DWS);*
*1962 U. 5. Public Health Service Drinking Water Standards;
PHS Publ. No. 956, Superintendent of Documents, Government
Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402, 61 pp.
-------
- 2 -
2. The water supply systems supplying this water
to the consumers had facility deficiencies
that might Indicate or lead to potentially
unsafe drinking water;
3. The bacteriological surveillance programs over
these water supply systems meet the established
criteria (See page 15).
The authority for the Community Water Supply Study
1s found in Title III, Part A, Section 301, Public Health
Service Act, amended (42 U. S. C. 241).
"Sec. 301 - The Surgeon General shall conduct 1n the
Service, and encourage, cooperate with, and render
assistance to other appropriate public authorities,
scientific Institutions, and scientists 1n the con-
duct of, and promote the coordination of, research,
Investigations, experiments, demonstrations, and
studies relating to the causes, diagnosis, treatment,
control, and prevention of physical and mental diseases
and Impairments of man, Including water purification..."
-------
- 3 -
SCOPE
Public water supplies in the United States numbered
19,236 serving some 150,000,000 people when last inventoried
in 1963.* The remaining 50,000,000 people had private water
supplies. Most of the public water supplies were small,
about 85 percent serving 5,000 or less people. About one-half
of the public was served by the 18,837 supplies that each
served 100,000 or less persons and the other one-half
(77,000,000) were served by the 399 larger supplies. About
75 percent of these public water supplies have ground water
as a source, while 18 percent use surface water. The
remaining 7 percent have a mixture of ground and surface
water source.
Systems Studied
This study covered 969 public water supply systems,
including .885 communi ty water supply systems (91.3% of the
total) and 84 special water supply systems (8.7% of the
total). For this study the following definitions of the
systems were used.
PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM - A water supply system
includes the works and auxiliaries for collection,
treatment, storage, and distribution of water from
the sources of supply to the free-flowing outlet of
the ultimate consumer. Water supply systems were
included in this study, if they had 15 or more service
connections and/or served 25 or more consumers.
Special Water Supply Systems - are those
systems serving trailer and mobile home parks,
other tourist accommodations and institutions
with resident populations.
Community Water Supply Systems - are all other
systems studied in an SMSA.
* Statistical Summary of Municipal Water Facilities in the
United States, January 1, 1963; PHS Publ. No. 1039,
Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C. 1965, 66 pp.
-------
- 4 -
The 969 public water supply systems studied (5 percent
of the national total) served about 18,200,000 persons (12
percent of the total population served by public water
supplies) and consisted of 613 ground water systems,120 surface
water systems, 46 systems with mixed sources, 106 systems
buying finished water from another system, hereafter called
wholesale finished water source systems, and 84 special
water supply systems.
For the purpose of the report, water supply systems
were divided Into four types: 1) those using surface
water or a mixture of surface and ground water as a source;
2) those using ground water as a source (this type was further
divided Into: a) wells, b) springs, and c) mixture of both;
3) those purchasing wholesale finished water as a source; and 4)
special water supply systems. Table 1 shows the number of systems
In each category and the population served in each region
and In the entire study.
The number of public water supply systems in various
population ranges is given in Table 2. The 22 major cities
included 73 percent of the study population while only 0.5
percent are served by the 446 systems serving less than 500
consumers. The water treatment practices found 1n the study
are presented in Tables 3 and 4.
Study Areas
Background for selection of each of the nine study
areas and the definition of Standard Metropolitan Statistical
Area (SMSA) are given below.
STANDARD METROPOLITAN STATISTICAL AREA -- The boundaries
and titles of standard metropolitan statistical areas are
established by the Bureau of the Budget with the advice
of the Federal Committee on Standard Metropolitan
Statistical Areas. An SMSA is a county or group of
contiguous counties which contains at least one city
of 50,000 inhabitants or more or "twin cities" with
a combined population of at least 50,000. In addition
to the county, or counties, containing such a city
or cities, contiguous counties are included in an SMSA
if, according to certain criteria, they «B«
essentially metropolitan 1n character and are socially
and economically Integrated with the central city.
-------
- 5 -
TABLE 1
SUMMARY OF WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM TYPES BY REGION
Pop. in
Region Thousands
Number of Systems by Type
Surface
and Mixed
Source
Ground Source
Wells
Springs
Mixture
of Both
Wholesale
Finished
Source
Special
Total
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII -
IX
307.2
12,356.3
229.3
251.1
1,366.0
1,383.5
1 ,085.4
111.5
1,113.4
18,203.8
73
14
H
1
8
23
7
4
22
166
40
135
12
16
31
24
14
11
213
496
67
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
11
80
23
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
12
37
1
30
3
3
19
34
2
0
14
106
14
41
0
2
8
7
3
3
6
84
218
221
30
22
66
88
26
20
278
969
Study population
served in Thous-
ands :
12,777 4,060
149
29 1,093
94 18,204
-------
- 6 -
TABLE 2
SIZE DISTRIBUTION OF SYSTEMS STUDIED
Total
Population
Population
Range
OOO
500-1,000
1,000-5,000
5,000-10,000
10,000-25,000
25,000-50,000
50,000-100,000
100,000-1,000,000
>1, 000, 000
Total
Number of
Systems
446
101
214
75
59
36
16
21
1
969
Percent
of Total
46
10
22
8
6
4
2
2
<1
Served in
Thousands
87.6
73.0
532.3
539.6
1,018.6
1,380.2
1,110.0
5,362.5
8,100.0
18,203.8
Percent
of Total
-------
TABLE 3
WATER TREATMENT PRACTICES IN THE SYSTEMS STUDIED
Treatment Practice
Do not disinfect,
clarify, or buy,
chlorinated water
Disinfection only or
buv chlorinated water
Clarification* and
disinfection
Clari f i cati on *
without disinfection
System Totals -
Number
Type of System (Number of Systems of each)
Surface
Water &
Mixed
Source
13
64
88
1
166
i
Ground Water Source
Spri ngs
65
15
0
0
80
Wells
330
108
52
6
496
Mi xture
of Both
25
12
0
0
37
Wholesale
Finished
Water
Source
10
93
3
0
106
Special
Sys terns
53
19
12
0
84
Overall System
Totals
Number
496
311
155
7
969
Percent
51
32
16
1
100
I
--J
I
*C1arification is the removal of suspended material by coagulation, sedimentation
and/or filtration.
-------
TABLE 4
WATER TREATMENT PRACTICES IN THE SYSTEMS STUDIED
Treatment Practice
Do not disinfect,
clarify, or buy
chlorinated water
Disinfection only or
buy chlorinated water
Clarification* and
disi nfecti on
Clarification*
without disinfection
System Totals -
Number
Population Served in Thousands
(Number of Systems of Each)
<-5
318
98
29
1
446
.5-5
131
117
63
4
315
5-10
17
38
19
1
75
10-25
20
24
15
0
59
25-50
8
19
8
1
36
50-100
2
6
8
0
16
> 100
0
9
13
0
22
Overal 1 Sys tern
Totals
Number
496
311
155
7
969
Percent
51
32
16
1
100
CO
*Clarification is the removal of suspended material by coagulation, sedimentation and/or
fi11rat ion.
-------
- 9 -
Region I - State of Vermont
Vermont was included in the study at the request of
the Commissioner of Health with the concurrence of the
Governor. (Replaced the initially selected SMSA in this
Regi on).
Region II - New York, New York
This SMSA included Rockland, Westchester, Nassau, and
Suffolk Counties in addition to the city of New York. It
was selected to represent those water supplies utilizing
surface water providing disinfection only for treatment and
those utilizing ground waters from high population denstiy
areas. It also represents the highly urbanized (megapolis)
areas of the United States.
Region III - Charleston, West Virginia
This SMSA included Kanawha County. It was selected
to represent those supplies using surface waters that
receive the wastes from a highly industrializedarea. The
small coal mine town supplies represent supplies in economically
depressed areas of the northern Applachian area.
Region IV - Charleston, South Carolina
This SMSA included Berkeley and Charleston Counties.
It was selected to represent the Atlantic and Gulf coast
areas using both surface and ground water.
Region V - Cincinnati, Ohio - Kentucky - Indiana
This SMSA included Hamilton, Warren and Clermont
Counties, Ohio; Boone, Campbell, and Kenton Counties,
Kentucky; and Dearborn County, Indiana. It was selected to
represent those portions of mid-America using surface water
receiving a considerable amount of industrial discharge
in addition to municipal wastes and agricultural runoff.
-------
- 10 -
Region VI - Kansas City, Missouri - Kansas
This SMSA included Cass, Clay, Jackson, and Platte
Counties, Missouri and Johnson and Wyandotte Counties, Kansas.
It is similar to the Cincinnati SMSA, but was selected to
represent surface waters with a larger agricultural runoff to
industrial waste ratio.
Region VII - New Orleans, Louisiana
This SMSA included Jefferson, Orleans, St. Bernard,
and St. Tammany Parishes, Louisiana. It was selected to
represent the supplies receiving surface water drained from
large and varied river basins, plus some from deep artesian
welIs.
Region VIII - Pueblo, Colorado
This SMSA included Pueblo County, Colorado. It was
selected to represent the water supplies of the high plains
region of the country that has a mixture of ground water and
surface water sources.
Region IX - San Bernardino - Riverside - Ontario, California
This SMSA included San Bernardino and Riverside
Counties, California. It was selected to represent the
semi-arid regions of the west and southwest as well as an
area served primarily by ground water.
Figure 1 shows the location and the relative size
of each study area.
-------
SAN BERNARDINO
RIVERSIDE
ONTARIO
PUEBLO
KANSAS CITY .VERMONT.
CINCINNATI
vi u.f-
;—?— * • I IOWA I
s—sl
For* HBW-110
(•Rev. 3/57)
FIG. 1. SIZE AND LOCATION OF SAMPLING AREAS
RKOIQN REGIONAL OFFICE
I Boston, Massachusetts
II New York, New York
HI. Charlottesville, Virginia
IV Atlanta, Georgia
V Chicago, Illinois
VI Kansas City, Missouri
VII Dallas, Texas
VIII Denver, Colorado
DC. San Francisco, California
-------
- 12 -
EVALUATION CRITERIA
Each water supply system was investigated on three
bases: 1) drinking water quality was determined by sampling
the finished and distributed water and returning these samples
to the laboratories of the Bureau of Water Hygiene for bac-
teriological, chemical, and trace metal analyses; 2) the status
of the water supply system facilities was determined by a field
survey of the system and the gathering of data on three stand-
ard forms (four items were chosen to represent major problems;
a) source(s), b) treatment, if any, c) distribution system
pressures, and d) operation); 3) the status for the surveil-
lance program over the water supply system was evaluated by
obtaining bacteriological water quality data for the previous
12 months of record from state and county health department
files.
Hater Quality Criteria
Water quality was judged either:
(1) Not to exceed the Constituent Limits of the DWS,
hereafter called met Drinking Water Standards, or,
(2) To exceed at least one "recommended" Constituent
Limit (some are aesthetic parameters), but does
not exceed any "mandatory" Constituent Limit
(hereafter called Exceeded recommended, but not
mandatory limits) or,
(3) To exceed at least one "mandatory" Constituent
Limit (hereafter called Exceeded "mandatory"
limits).
The Drinking Water Standards Constituent Limits measured
in this study are summarized in Table 5 below.
-------
TABLE 5
Partial List of Bacteriological, Chemical, and
Physical Constituent Concentration Limits Taken from
the 1962 U.S. Public Health Service Drinking Water
Standards
RECOMMENDED LIMITS
(If the concentration of any of these constituents are
exceeded, a more suitable supply or treatment should
be sought)
Consti tuent Limit
Alkyl Benzene Sulfonate
(Measured as methylene-blue-
active substances) 0.5 mg/1
Arsenic 0.01 mg/1*
Boron 1.0 mg/1**
Chloride 250 mg/1
Color 15 Units
Copper 1.0 mg/1
Carbon-Chloroform Extract (CCE) 0.200 mg/1
Cyanide 0.01 mg/1
Fluoride
Temp. (Ann.Avg.Max.Day, 5 years
or more)
50.0-53.7 1.7 mg/1
53.8-58.3 1.5 mg/1
58.4-63.8 1.3 mg/1
63.9-70.6 1.2 mg/1
70.7-79.2 1.0 mg/1
79.3-90.5 0.8 mg/1
Iron 0.3 mg/1
Manganese 0.05 mg/1
Nitrate 45 mg/1
Radium-226 3 yyc/1
Strontium-90 10 yyc/1(DCi/I)
Sulfate 250 mg/1
Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) 500 mg/1
Turbidi ty
Untreated 5 Units
Treated by more than
disinfection 1 Unit
Zinc 5 mg/1
-------
- 14 -
TABLE 5 (Contd.)
MANDATORY LIMITS
(If the concentration of any of these constituents
are exceeded, the further use of this water for
drinking and culinary purposes should be evaluated
by the appropriate health authority because water
of this quality represents a hazard to
the health of consumers.)
Consti tuent
Arsenic
Barium
Boron
Cadmium
Chromi urn
Col iform
Limit
(hexavalent)
organisms (Measured
by membrane filter technique)
Cyanide
Fluoride
Temp. (Ann
or more)
50.0-53.7
53.8-58.3
58.4-63.8
63.9-70.6
70.7-79.2
79.3-90.5
Gross Beta activity (in
absence of aor Sr-90)
Lead
Seleni urn
Silver
Avg.Max.Day - 5 years
the
0,
1,
5,
0,
0.
05 mg/1
0 mg/1
0 mg/1**
01 mg/1
05 mg/1
Fails std. if:
a) Arithmetic average
of samples collected
greater than 1 per 100
ml
b) Two or more samples
(5% or more if more than
20 examined) contain
densities more than
4/100 ml
0.2 mg/1
2.4 mg/1
2.2 mg/1
2.0 mg/1
1.8 mg/1
1.6 mg/1
1.4 mg/1
1,000 yyc/KpCi/1)***
0.05 mg/1
0.01 mg/1
0.05 mg/1
0.01
*Although the recommended arsenic concentration is
mg/1, because of interferences in some waters, the
concentration of arsenic was only determined to be
less than 0.03 mg/1. For the purposes of this study,
these waters were considered not to exceed the recommended
standard.
**Proposed for inclusion in the Drinking Water Standards.
***If these limits are exceeded, refer to Section 6.2
of the DWS.
-------
- 15 -
Facilities Criteria
Source, treatment, operation, and distribution facili-
ties were judged* either:
1) To be essentially free from major deficiencies, or
2) To be deficient in one or more of the following
(where applicable):
a) Source protection (in absence of disinfection
or buying chlorinated water)
b) Disinfection (if disinfection practiced)
c) Control of disinfection (if practiced or if
purchasing chlorinated water)
d) Clarification capabilities (if clarification
practiced)
e) Control of clarification (if clarification
practi ced)
f) Pressure (<20 psi) in some or all areas of
the distribution system
Bacteriological Surveillance Program Criteria
The bacteriological surveillance program over the
water supply system was judged either:
1) To meet the following criteria, or,
2) Not to meet one or both of the following:
a) Collection of the required number** of
bacteriological samples for no less than
11 months during the previous 12 months
of record.
b) Passing the bacteriological quality standard**
for no less than 11 months during the previous
12 months of record.
*See "Manual for Evaluating Public Drinking Water Supplies,
PHS Publication No. 1820, 1969" for basis of judgment.
**See pages 3-6 of the Drinking Water Standards.
-------
- 16 -
METHODS
Field Survey
The regional office staff, in cooperation with the state
and local health department officials, prepared a listing of all
known water supplies meeting the definition adopted for this
study. The list contained the supply name, address, name of the
superintendent or person in charge, indication of size, and the
telephone number. The list was cross-checked with community and
subdivision names to eliminate duplication and establish those
areas for which the water supply facilities were apparently un-
known. A Form PHS 682, Report of Water Supply Used on Interstate
Carriers, was prepared for each supply from state and local health
department records. The completed list became the basis for work
schedules for the field engineers.
Actual field surveys were made by one of the 20 PHS
engineers from headquarters and the regional offices that made
up the field staff. At the option of state and local health
department staff members, they made surveys with the PHS engineer.
The staff of the field office made appointments by telephone, for
the surveys, one to seven days in advance, except for the Kansas
and Missouri State Health Departments who made the appointments
several weeks in advance of the study.
During the field survey, the engineer completed Forms
ECA-18, Inventory of Municipal Water Facilities, and ECA-19,
Municipal Water Supply Sanitary Survey, to provide information
on source, treatment; operation; laboratory control; personnel;
distribution; surveillance practices; planning for improvements;
and water rates. Examples of the standard forms are in the
Appendix.
Sampling Program
The following samples were collected and dispatched to
various Bureau of Water Hygiene Laboratories:
-------
- 17 -
1) Raw water
One sample for bacteriological analysis.
2) Finished water ready for distribution
Four or 5 samples for chemical analyses as follows:
a) 2 1/2-gallon sample to the Northeast Water Hygiene
Laboratory. This was a grab sample for most
ground water and small surface water treatment
plants, but where possible a 14-day composite was
taken. The following analyses were made on this
sample:
Arsenic Cyanide Sulfate
Boron MBAS TDS
Chloride Nitrate Turbidity
Color Selenium
b) 8-oz. aliquot sample for trace metals analysis
was taken out of sample 2)a) above and sent to the
Cincinnati Laboratory. The following analyses
were made on this sample:
Barium Copper Manganese ,
Cadmium Fluoride Nickel
Chromium Iron Silver
Cobalt Lead Specific Conductance
Zinc
c) 1-gallon sample for radioactivity analyses was
sent to one of the three Bureau of Radiological
Health Laboratories. It was collected in the same
manner as sample 2)a) above. The following
analyses were made on this sample:
Specific qamma emitting radionuclides
<131I.137C.i. U°Ba)
Gross Alpha
Gross Beta
Radium-226, if gross alpha exceeded 3 pCi/1
Strontium-90, if gross beta exceeded 10 pC1/l
Tritium - (run on 10% of samples)
-------
- 18 -
d) 1-gallon sample for pesticide analysis to the
Gulf Coast Water Hygiene Laboratory from surface
water supplies plus those ground water supplies
where sampling was specifically requested by the
state or county health officials. It was col-
lected in the same manner as sample 2)a) above.
The following analyses were made on this sample:
Aldrin Endrin Methoxychlor
Chlordane Heptachlor Toxaphene
DDT Heptachlor Epoxide
Dieldrin Lindane
e) 1 activated carbon monitor sample to the Cincinnati
Laboratory from 110 selected water supplies, 94 of
which were from surface sources. Carbon Chloroform
Extract (CCE) and Carbon Alcohol Extract (CAE) con-
centrations were determined from this monitor.
3) Distribution System
Samples for bacteriological and trace metal analyses
at the rate of 10 percent of the number required by
.Figure 1, of the DWS, with a minimum of 2 each from
any water supply.
These samples were taken from consumer's faucets where
water was likely to be withdrawn for drinking or culin-
ary purposes. A bacteriological sample was taken only
after flushing for several seconds and the chemical
sample was then taken shortly thereafter. No special
treatment was given to the faucet because each sample
was meant to reflect the actual quality of the water
delivered to the consumer.
All samples were collected in 8-oz. sterile, plastic,
wide-mouth, screw-capped bottles which contained 0.2 ml
of a 10% solution of sodium thiosulfate as a dechlor-
inating agent. This concentration of thiosulfate was
-------
- 19 -
sufficient to neutralize a sample containing about
15 mg/1 residual chlorine, an amount above any residual
that was present. Refrigeration of all samples was
required during transportation back to the laboratory.
Maximum time between collection and analysis did not
exceed 30 hours.
Laboratory Procedures
Bacteriological
The bacteriological procedures were those of Standard
Methods.* The membrane filter (MF) procedure was used for
total coliform detection in this study for three reasons. One,
larger volumes (100-ml portions) of distributed water could be
examined than with the MPN technique; two, the MF procedure
yields more precise results; and three, less processing time
would be involved per sample, so reexamination of many of the
samples could have been made within the 30-hour time limit if
required. All potable and source water samples were examined
for total coliforms using M-Endo MF broth, incubated at 35°C
for 20-24 hours. Because raw water quality varied with its
source, three decimal sample portions were filtered, the volume
being determined by the estimated water quality.
Any coliform colonies detected in the examination of a
sample were further verified by transfer to phenol red lactose
for 24- and 48-hour periods at 35°C incubation. All positive
phenol .red lactose broth tubes then were confirmed in brilliant
green lactose at 35°C for verification of total coliforms and
in EC medium at 44.5°C for detection of fecal coliforms. This
procedure further confirmed the standard total coliform MF test
and supplied additional information on the potentially hazard-
ous occurrence of fecal coliform in those potable water supplies
*Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater,
12th Ed., APHA, AWWA, and WPCF. American Public Health Assoc.
New York, N.Y. , 1965. 796 pp.
-------
- 20 -
Basic knowledge was also needed on the general bacterial
population of potable water. Therefore, the general population
of bacterial count (plate count) was also made on all distribu-
tion system samples. Sample portions of 1 ml and 0.1 ml in
plate count agar (Tryptone-Glucose-Yeast Agar), incubated 48
hours at 35°C were sufficient to yield the desired data.
Chemical
The five samples, as noted above, taken to determine
the chemical quality of the finished and/or distributed water
were analyzed as follows:
Sample 2)a), General Chemistry.
These constituents were generally determined by Stand-
ard Methods, except as listed below.
Barium
No standard method existed at the time this study
was undertaken. An atomic absorption procedure,
which will appear in the next edition of Standard
Methods, was used and was found acceptable. The
analysis was made only on those samples that had
less than 2 mg/1 sulfate because above that con-
centration the barium precipitates out of solution.
Chloride
A variation of the potentiometric titration proce-
dure was used, which is a tentative method in Stand-
ard Methods, page 372. Rather than titrate with
silver nitrate to a specified end-point in millivolts,
using a glass electrode and a silver-silver chloride
electrode, a standard curve was prepared that related
millivolts to chloride concentration. The concentra-
tion of an unknown is then determined from the stand-
ard curve. The procedure was just as accurate as the
titration method and was simpler to carry out.
-------
- 21 -
FT uoride
A fluoride electrode method, which will appear in
the next edition of Standard Methods, was used.
Precision and accuracy was generally better than
any other method and the method was simpler to carry
out.
Sample 2)b), Trace Metals.
The atomic absorption spectrophotometer method was used
for all heavy metals (cadmium, chromium, copper, iron, lead,
manganese, silver, zinc, nickel, and cobalt) because its
sensitivity, specificity, simplicity and speed of analysis
far exceeded the usual wet chemical methods. An atomic ab-
sorption method for these metals will appear in the next edi-
tion of Standard Methods.
Sample 2)c), Radioactivity.
These radiological constituents were determined using
standard radiological counting techniques.
Sample 2)d), Pesticides.
No standard procedure for pesticide determinations
existed at the time the CWSS was undertaken. Gas chroma-
tography is generally the accepted method of analysis and
will appear in the next edition of Standard Methods. There-
fore, this technique was used.
Sample 2)e), Organics (CCE and CAE).
These organic constituents were determined using
standard extraction techniques.
-------
- 22 -
RESULTS
This section contains the principal data on the three
major objectives of this study; that is, a determination of:
1) the drinking water quality in the study areas, 2) the
status of the water supply systems providing this drinking
water, and 3) the status of the bacteriological surveillance
programs over these water supply systems. In general, the
data will be discussed on a National basis, except for cer-
tain problems that are obviously regional in nature. Details
of the findings for each DHEW Region are contained in the
nine separate Regional Reports.
Study Sample
In an attempt to study a variety of water supply prob-
lems, and a variety of types of water supply systems of
various sizes, the decision was made, in the design of this
study, to investigate all of the public water supplies in
nine geographically distributed study areas. While this
technique was not expected to provide a perfect random sample
of water supply systems throughout the country, the results
are considered to be reasonably representative of the status
of the water supply industry in the United States.
This is verified by using the data in Public Health
Service Publication No. 1039, "Statistical Summary of Munici-
pal Water Facilities in the United States, January 1, 1963,"
and comparing certain statistical breakdowns to those of the
CWSS. Nationally, about 77 percent of the public water sup-
plies had ground water as a source in 1963, while about 64
percent of the supplies in the CWSS had this category of
source. The 1963 Facilities Inventory also showed that in
the United States, 3.6 percent of the water supplies served
larger municipalities, greater than 50,000 population, while
3.9 percent of the water supplies in the CWSS served communi-
ties with populations greater than 50,000. The CWSS sample
-------
- 23 -
included about 5 percent of the water supplies in the United
States as listed in the 1963 Municipal Water Facilities Inven-
tory.
Water Quality - Influence of Source and Community Size
Tables 6 and 7 show that overall, 59 percent of the
water supply systems studied met the Drinking Water Stand-
ards. Included in the 41 percent that exceeded the Con-
stituent Limits were 16 percent that exceeded mandatory
limits, while the remainder exceeded recommended, but not
mandatory limits.
Table 6 demonstrates that the spring and spring and
well sources, a majority of which were unprotected and/or
inadequately treated, produced the poorest water quality,
mainly because of high coliform densities in the distributed
water. Protected wells, on the other hand, produced rela-
tively uncontaminated water. The high percentage that did
not exceed the mandatory limits was the result of low coliform
densities in ground water. Because of the higher content
of inorganics in ground water, well sources did, however,
have the highest percentage of systems exceeding recommended,
but not mandatory limits. Surface waters, although often
drawn from polluted sources are usually improved by treatment.
Because of this treatment the overall quality of surface and
mixed sources was equal to that of well source systems.
Systems buying water from another system showed the
highest percentage of water quality that met the Drinking
Water Standards. This is probably because these systems buy
water from larger supplies which are generally the better
systems. The Special Systems were, in general producing water
quality slightly above the average for the entire study. This
may be related to their general use of acceptable ground water
sources.
-------
TABLE 6
WATER QUALITY EVALUATION BY SOURCE
Met Drinking Water Standards
"Exceeded Constituent Limits
Exceeded recommended but
not mandatory limits
Exceeded mandatory limits
System Totals - Number
Tyoe of System (All data are percent
of System Totals)
^Turface
Water &
Mixed
Source
57
43
25
18
166
Ground Water
Springs
45
55
14
41
80
Wells
57
43
29
14
496
Mixture
of Both
54
46
11
35
37
Wholesale
Finished
Water
Source
76
24
19
5
106
Speci al
Systems
65
35
23
12
84
Overal 1
System Totals
Number
572
397
238
159
969
t
Percent]
59
41
25
16
-
I
ro
*See pages 12-lflfor definition of Constituent Limits.
-------
TABLE 7
WATER QUALITY EVALUATION BY COMMUNITY SIZE
Met Drinking Water Standards
Exceeded Constituent Limits*
Exceeded recommended but
not mandatory limits
Exceeded mandatory limits
System Totals - Number
Population Served in Thousands (All
data are percent of Size Totals)
<-5
50
50
26
24
446
.5-5
67
23
21
12
315
5-10
64
36
25
11
75
10-25
71
29
20
9
59
25-50
67
33
30
3
36
50-100
62
38
31
7
16
>100
73
27
27
0
22
Overal 1
System Totals.
Number
572
397
238
159
969
Percent
53
41
25
16
-
ro
C7I
Note: Percent of 18.2 million study population in the four above groups was
Met Drinking Water Standards
Exceeded Constituent Limits
Exceeded Recommended Limits
Exceeded Mandatory Limits
86
14
12
2
*See pages 12-14 for definition of Constituent Limits.
-------
- 26 -
Table 7 shows that, In general, the larger communities
produce much better quality water than the smaller ones. While
the percentage exceeding recommended, but not mandatory limits
does not vary much with size, the percent of systems that ex-
ceed mandatory limits declines dramatically as the communities
become larger. The reason 86 percent of the study population
was served drinking water that met the Drinking Water Standards
when only 59 percent of the systems were evaluated thusly, 1s,
as shown in Table 7, bigger systems, where most of the study
population reside, distribute better quality water. In spite
of many of the small communities using well sources, one-half
of these systems exceeded the Constituent Limits. These systems
are served mainly by springs, or surface water.
Facilities Evaluation - Influence of Source and Community Size
Tables 8 and 9 show that overall 44 percent of the
water supply systems investigated in the CWSS were essentially
free from major deficiencies. Tables 3 and 4 on pages 8 and 9
of this report present details regarding the water supply system
facilities found during the study. In summary, 496 systems did
not practice disinfection, clarification or buy chlorinated
water, 311 systems practiced disinfection only or bought chlo-
rinated water, 155 systems practiced clarification and disinfec-
tion, and 7 systems practiced clarification without disinfection,
Source Protection
Table 8 shows that 41 percent of the untreated spring,
and spring and well sources also were poorly protected. This
poor protection, combined with the lack of treatment, explains
the poor water quality that these sources deliver, as shown by
Table 6.
-------
TABLE 8
FACILITIES EVALUATION BY SOURCE
Essentially free of major
deficiencies
Major Deficiencies
Inadequate source protection,
in the absence of disinfectior
or buyinq chlorinated water
Inadequate disinfection , if
practiced
Inadequate control of
disinfection, if practiced or
if buying chlorinated water
Inadequate clarification, if
practiced
Inadequate control of
clarification, if practiced
Type of System (All data are percent
of System Totals bv Tvoe)
Surface
Mater &
Mixed
Source
15
85
8
35
11
16
33
Low (<20 psi) pressure in some 35
or all areas of the dist. system
System Totals - Number
166
Ground Water
Springs
28
72
41
11
4
N.A.
N.A.
51
80
Wells
l
9
18
14
6
3
<1
22
496
Mixture
of Both
30
70
38
17
5
N.A.
N.A.
32
37
Who lesa le
Finished
Water
Source
60
40
22
4
5
0
0
15
106
Special
Systems
58
42
13
13
10
2
5
15
84
Overal 1
System Totals
Number
422
547
184
155
65
43
60
249
969
Percent
44
56
19
16
7
4
6
26
no
N.A. Means not applicable
-------
- 28 -
Table 9 shows that the bulk of the unprotected sources
are serving communities of less than 500 population. Very
few communities with a population greater than 10,000 were
drawing water from a poorly protected source. Of course,
many of these larger communities overcome the poor quality
of their raw water through either disinfection, or clarifi-
cation and disinfection.
Disinfection
Table 8 indicates that the major problem with disin-
fection is with surface .and mixed surface and ground water
sources. These systems not only had the highest percentage
of systems with inadequate disinfection, if practiced, but
also had one of the highest percentages showing inadequate
control of disinfection. This probably explains why only
57 percent of this type of system provided water quality that
met the Drinking Water Standards (Table 6) even though most
of these sources are treated. The reason that communities hav-
ing a population from 5,000 to 10,000 have the poorest record
with respect to disinfection or disinfection control, see
Table 9 may be because these towns are large enough to obtain
water from surface sources where treatment is required, but
are not large enough to attract high quality operators or to
finance high quality treatment plants.
Cl arifi cation
As in the case of disinfection, Table 8 shows that
the poorest record of clarification and control of clarifi-
cation was found in surface,and mixed surface and ground
water sources. This is particularly serious, because these
sources are precisely the ones that need adequate clarifi-
cation if disinfection is to be effective. Three of the
22 larger communities (14 percent) had inadequate clarification
and 2 (10 percent) had inadequate clarification control, see
Table 9. Because this size community often draws water from
-------
TABLE
FACILITIES EVALUATION BY COMMUNITY SIZE
Essentially free of major |
deficiencies.
Major Deficiencies
Inadequate source protection,
in the absence of disinfection
or buying chlorinated water
Inadequate disinfection, if
practiced
Inadequate control of
disinfections, if practiced or
if buying chlorinated water
Inadequate clarifications if
practiced
Inadequate control of
clarification, if practiced
Low (<20 psi) pressure in
some or all areas of the
dist. system
System Totals - Number
Population Served in Thousands (All
data are nercent of Svstem Totals bv Tvpe)
<. 5 1 .5-5 || 5-10 | 10- 25| 25 -50 | 50-100 |>100
39
61
27
12
8
I
3
32
446
44
56
17
20
7
49
51
7
28
8
7 1 8
11
17
315
4
24
75
49 \64-
51
5
24
5
8
5
22
59
36
6
6
3
3
3
25
36
50
50
0
13
0
12
6
21
16
64
36
0
9
0
14
10
32
22
Overall
Svstem Totals
Number | Percent
422
547
184
155
65
43
58
249
969
44
56
19
16
7
4
6
26
••
(Note: 31 percent of the study population was served drinking water from systems that were
essentially free of major deficiencies.
-------
- 30 -
low quality sources such as major rivers, improvement in
clarification is necessary to provide these large populations
with high quality water.
Distribution System Pressure
Table 8 shows that along with their other difficulties,
the systems using spring sources had the poorest record of
maintaining greater than 20 psi pressure throughout their
distribution system. Table 9 indicates that, with respect to
community size, the greatest difficulty in maintaining ade-
quate distribution pressures is in the smallest and the
largest communities. About one-third of the communities less
than 500 and greater than 50,000 population had low pressure
in certain areas or throughout their distribution system. The
larger communities are faced with problems of an ever-growing
complexity of the distribution system, hilly terrain, and tall
buildings. Under these circumstances, maintenance of adequate
distribution pressure, vital though it may be to prevent back-
flow, is very difficult.
Bacteriological Surveillance Proqram Evaluations:
Influence of Source and Community Size
Tables 10 and 11 indicate that overall only 10 percent
of the systems studied met the bacteriological surveillance
criteria. Again, the spring and spring and well sources had
the poorest record. Even the best record, 21 percent for
supplies with surface and mixed surface and ground water
sources, was poor. Table 11 indicates that with the exception
of the 25,000 to 50,000 size community, whose data are unex-
plainable at this time, the towns less than 500 population had
the poorest records. Even the largest communities, however,
were doing poorly, with only 36 percent of the 22 communities
greater than 100,000 meeting the criteria.
As noted on page 15, the bacteriological surveillance
criteria have two parts, a collection portion and a quality
-------
TABLE 10
BACTERIOLOGICAL SURVEILLANCE EVALUATION BY SOURCE
Met bacteriological
surveillance criteria*
Did not meet bacteriological
surveillance criteria*
Did not collect samples a
at rate in the
bacteriological
surveillance criteria*
System Totals - Number
Type of System (All data are percent of
System Totals
Surface
Water &
Mi xed
Source
21
79
68
166
Ground Water
Springs
2
98
98
80
Wells
9
91
85
496
Mi xture
of Both
2
98
95
37
Wholesale
Fi ni shed
Water
Source
8
92
92
106
Speci al
Systems
7
93
94
84
Overal 1
System Totals
Number
100
869
827
969
Percent
10
90
1
55
-
CO
*See page 15 for definition of bacteriological surveillance criteria.
-------
TABLE 11
BACTERIOLOGICAL SURVEILLANCE EVALUATION BY COMMUNITY SIZE
Met bacteriological
surveillance criteria*
Did not meet bacteriological"
surveillance criteria"
Did not collect samples at
the rate in the
bacteriological surveillance
cri teria*
System Totals - Number
Population Served in Thousands (All
data are nercent of System Totals)
<.5
4
96
94
446
.5-5
18
82
74
315
5-10
12
88
83
75
10-25
10
90
85
59
25-50
3
97
92
36
50-100
12
88
88
16
>100
36
64
64
22
Overall
*?v« t»n» . Jnt.a 1
Number
100
869
. 827
969
Percent
10
90
85
-
Note: 60 percent of the study population were served drinking water by systems over
which the bacteriological surveillance program met the criteria.
*See page 15 for definition of bacteriological surveillance criteria.
-------
- 33 -
portion. To evaluate each supply, the number of samples
collected was compared to the collection criteria, and the
coliform density from the samples collected, if any, were
compared to the quality portion of the criteria. Every
supply could be evaluated on the collection portion, but only
those supplies that collected some samples could be evaluated
on the quality portion of the criteria. If a supply did not
collect any samples, it obviously could not have any samples
with coliform densities reported. Therefore, the collection
portion of the criteria can be analyzed separately, but the
quality portion cannot.
The purpose of evaluating the sample collection portion
of the criteria separately is to show the numbers of supplies
that are not meeting this portion of the criteria. However,
mere collection of samples is no guarantee that a supply would
pass the criteria. This is because many supplies that now
collect too few samples, might find that when sufficient sam-
ples are collected they would exceed the quality portion of
the criteria.
Tables 10 and 11 do show, however, that overall, 85
percent of the water supply systems investigated did not col-
lect samples at the rate in the bacteriological surveillance
criteria. This means that many supplies, if they are produc-
ing good quality water, could meet the criteria merely by
collecting and analyzing sufficient samples.
For comparison purposes, data were gathered to deter-
mine how many of the water supply systems studied did not
collect sufficient bacteriological samples at a rate equal to
50 percent of that called for in the DWS. This analysis shows
that 827 systems, (85 percent of the total) did not take suffi-
cient samples, while 670 (69 percent of the total) did not
take samples at even half the rate given in the DWS. This
reveals that assuming a sampling rate of only 50 percent of
-------
- 34 -
that in the DWS is satisfactory, an additional 157 supplies
(16 percent of the study total) would have collected sufficient
samples. This demonstrates that in most systems the sampling
rate is not just below that called for in the DWS, it is not
even close to 50 percent of that rate.
Selecting for analysis the supplies that collected at
least one-half enough samples for six months of the previous
year of record, 48 percent would not have met the quality
portion of the bacteriological surveillance criteria. This
percentage failing to meet this criteria ranged from 57 per-
cent for the smaller systems (<500) to 4 percent for the
systems serving more than 50,000 persons.
-------
- 35 -
DISCUSSION OF RESULTS
The Discussion of Results section contains information
interpreted for the country as a whole from data collected
during the CWSS on four items of special importance to
the water supply industry. These are: 1) quality of source
water, 2) quality of distributed water, 3) control of health
hazards, and 4) influence of water supply system size on
operation and performance.
Quality of Source Water
Surface Water
Changes in the quality of a raw water source can
result in changes in the quality of treated water furnished
to the consumer. Continual deterioration of source quality
may force the water utility to use more extensive treatment
methods or seek alternate sources to maintain finished
water quality. These actions usually result in an increase in
the cost of water.
In many areas, pollution abatement has not kept pace
with the increasing effects of man-made pollution, particularly
in our surface waters. As a result, the quality of many water
supplies' raw water sources has been threatened. In an effort
to evaluate the magnitude of this threat, a portion of the
CWSS was designed to obtain information on the past and present
source quality for each water supply system studied.
Specifically, information was sought during the
sanitary survey on the present adequacy of the source with
respect to quantity, bacteriological, chemical, and physical
quality, and source protection. In addition, an attempt
was made to determine if the overall quality of the source had
improved, deteriorated, or stayed the same during the past
three years. In general, the answers to the latter question
were subjective opinions of the water supply system operators.
-------
- 36 -
This is a summary of the source quality information
obtained from those water systems that have surface raw
water sources. For purposes of tabulation, a water supply was
considered to have a surface source when:
1. Its only source of raw water was from a river,
stream, brook, lake, reservoir, pond, and so forthi or
2. Tn the case of a combined (surface plus ground)
source, more than 50 percent of the annual raw water volume
came from the surface source. Supplies for which the
relative percentage of surface and ground raw water volumes
could not be determined from the CWSS Inventory Form (ECA-18)
were not included.
Table 12 summarizes the information on source quantity
and quality obtained during the sanitary survey. These data
show that, in general, the quantity and quality of surface
water source was judged adequate by the engineers that
surveyed these systems. Only slightly over one-half of the
sources, however, were judged to be adequately protected.
The sources were used because safe water was provided by
adequate treatment. Conclusions on a national basis are
heavily influenced by the State of Vermont where many of
the unprotected sources did not receive adequate treatment.
Based on the operator's opinion, 59 percent reported
that the quality of their source had remained the same over
the past 3 years.
-------
- 37 -
TABLE 12
SUMMARY OF RESPONSES ON ADEQUACY OF SURFACE WATER SOURCES
Systems Percent Percent
Item
Quanti ty
Bacteriologi cal
Quality
Chemical
Quality
Physical
Quality
Source
Protection
Item
Responding
124
112
113
114
117
Systems
Responding
Adequate
87
80
83
83
55
Percent
Improved
Inadequate
13
20
17
17
45
Percent Percent
Deteriorated Same
Changes in
Source
Quality
During Last
3 Years
123
is
26
59
Note: 124 water supply systems were classified as surface
water source for this analysis.
-------
- aa -
Additional information on this subject was obtained from
the National Water duality Network, initiated by the Division
of Water Supply and Pollution Control of the U. S. Public
Health Service, in 1957. This network was operated by the
PHS until 1966, when the resoonsibi1ity was transferred to
the Pollution Surveillance Branch of the Federal Water
Pollution Control Administration (now the Federal Water Quality
Administration).
Of the 50 original samplinn locations established
for the network, three are at the raw water Intakes for
surface water supplies included in this CWSS. These
locations are:
1. Ohio River at Cincinnati, Ohio
(Cincinnati water treatment plant)
2. Missouri Rtver at Kansas City, Kansas:
(Kansas City water treatment plant)
3. Mississippi River at New Orleans, Louisiana
(Carrollton water treatment plant)
To obtain additional information about these sources,
seven water quality parameters, indicative of the quality of
the river for use as a water supply source, were selected. They
are:
1. One hour chlorine demand
2. Total hardness
3. Turbidity
4. Total alkalinity
5. Total algal count
6. Total coliform count
7. Total carbon chloroform extractables (CCE)
A review of the data for Cincinnati, Ohio shows that
since 1964 there has been:
1. little chanae in chlorine demand (data limited)
2. a sliqht cyclic variation in total hardness
3. a decreasing trend in turbidities
4. a gradual increase in total alkalinity
5. a marked reduction in alqal counts
-------
- 39 -
6. a decreasing trend (until 1968) in coliform counts
7. very little change in CCE
In general, these data support the opinions obtained
during the CWSS that the quality of the Ohio River as a
water supply source had either improved or stayed the same
in recent years.
The data for recent years from the Missouri River at
Kansas City show the following:
1. little or no change in chlorine demand, total
hardness, total alkalinity, or CCE
2. a marked reduction (approximately 7-fold) in
turbidity
3. a sharp increase in algal counts up to 1966
(data limited)
4. a decreasing trend in total coliforms
The turbidity data, in general, agree with the
reductions reported during the CWSS. The coliform data shows
a decreasing trend, however, in opposition to the increase in
microbiological loading reported in the study.
The Mississippi River is the only surface source in the
New Orleans SMSA. Most of the water supplies using the river
for raw water reported continued deterioration of source
quality during the past 3 years. The presence of wastes from
a vast complex of upstream sources renders the river difficult
to treat for water supply purposes. Tastes and odors are a
continual treatment problem in this area.
For this sampling station, the following changes in
the selected water quality parameters were noted:
1. marked increases in both algal counts and total
coliforms
2. after an unexplained initial decrease over a period
of 2 years, there was a gradual increase in 1-hour
chlorine demand
3. a gradual increase in total hardness
4. little change in total alkalinity and CCE
5. generally declining trend in turbidity
-------
- 40 -
The data for algal counts, total coliforms, chlorine
demand, and total hardness support, in varying degrees, the
reported conditions of continued source deterioration. The
deterioration reported in the CWSS at this location may be
better shown by observations other than those selected,
such as the aggravation of tastes and odors after chlorination..
and recognition of spills by continuous monitoring.
Ground Water
Well water is often thought to be of high bacteriological
quality. In the CWSS, for example, 67 percent of the well
waters were distributed to the consumers without being
disinfected. To determine whether or not this confidence
in well water is justified, the bacteriological data from
the raw well water samples in the CWSS were analyzed. These
data are presented in Table 13.
The three characteristics of bacteriological quality
of well water that stand out in this study are:
1. Nine percent of the wells produced water containing
coliform bacteria.
2. Two percent of the wells produced water containing
fecal coliform.
3. Eighty-three percent of the wells produced water
containing bacteria as measured by plate count.
Most of the wells having total coliform or fecal
coliform densities greater than 4/100 ml were constructed, or
so located as to make contamination of the water a not-too-
unexpected result. Examples of these included: "horizontal
wells" that are driven or drilled into the side of a hill and
are difficult to protect; and wells in consolidated formations
in poorly drained, inhabited areas.
While bacteria enumerated by plate count does not usually
have a direct health significance, heavy growths of bacteria
and other microorganisms do indicate the potential for
contamination. Also research findings suggest that high plate
counts inhibit the growth of coliform bacteria on laboratory
media, thereby obscuring their presence.
-------
- 41 -
TABLE 13
BACTERIOLOGICAL QUALITY OF RAW WATER FROM WELLS
Total Coliform Fecal Coliform Plate Count
Den si ty D e n s i ty Number
0/100 ml 91% 0/100 ml 35% 0/ml 17%
i
1/100 ml-4/100 ml 6% 1/100 ml-4/100 ml 1% l/ml-100/ml 53%
5/100 ml-10/100 ml 1% 5/100 ml-10/100 ml <1% 101/ml-500/ml 13%
11/100 ml-50/100 ml 1% 11/100 ml-50/100 ml 50/100 ml l% >50/100 ml <1% >1000/ml 7%
Note: For this analysis 621 individual wells were studied.
Quality of Distributed Water
Overal1 Water Quality
Chemical and bacteriological samples were collated and
analyzed from two or more points in the distribution systems of
the water supply systems studied. The results for each constituent
were then averaged to obtain a measure of the quality of the
drinking water delivered by that water supply system. The
concentration of the individual constituents was then compared
to the Constituent Limits to determine whether or not they
exceeded the limits. The number of water supply systems
exceeding each limit is presented in Table 14. In addition, to
assess how many water supply systems had multiple water quality
problems, the number of systems that exceeded a given constituent
limit plus at least one more is indicated.
These data indicate that the concentrations of only five
constituents, alkyl benzene sulfonate, strontium-90, boron, silver,
and cyanide (concentration may have decreased during transportation
to the laboratory) were not above the limits of the DWS. In
the recommended category, the expected problems with iron,
manganese, and total dissolved solids is demonstrated, but few
water supply systems exceeded the sulfate and chloride limits.
-------
- 42 -
TABLE 14
NUMBER OF WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS WHERE AVERAGE
DELIVERED WATER EXCEEDED SPECIFIC CONSTITUENT LIMITS
Constituent
Number of
Systems
Exceeding
Constituent
Limit
Percent of
All Water
Supplies
i n Study
Number of
Systems
Exceeding
One or More
Addi tional
Constituent
Limit
RECOMMENDED
Alkyl Benzene Sulfonate (ABS)
Arsenic
Boron *
Chloride
Color
Copper
Carbon-Chloroform Extract (CCE)**
Cyanide
Fluoride
Iron
Manganese
Iron and/or Manganese
Nitrate
Radium-226
Strontium-90
Sulfate
Total Dissolved Solids (TDS)
Turbidity
Zinc
MANDATORY
Arsenic
Barium
Boron*
Cadmi urn
Chromium (Hexavalent) ***
Coliform Organisms
Cyanide
Fluoride
Gross Beta Activity
Lead
Selenium
Silver
0
2
9
9
7
11
12
0
52
96
90
159
19
6
0
25
95
26
1
2
1
0
3
4
120
0
24
0
14
5
0
0
<1
1
1
1
1
1
0
5
10
9
16
3
1
0
3
10
3
<1
<1
<1
0
<1
<1
12
0
2
0
1
1
0
0
2
9
9
5
4
2
0
35
52
45
56
15
5
0
25
62
17
1
1
0
0
3
4
34
0
17
0
6
5
0
*Proposed for inclusion in the Drinking Water Standards.
**Measured in only 110 selected supplies, including 94 surface supplies
***During this study total chromium was measured and compared to
the standard.
-------
- 43 -
This occurred in spite of the number of ground water sources
studied. Some water supply systems were attempting to reduce
the iron and manganese content of their delivered water by
aeration. Of the 45 systems aerating, 87 percent were judged
adequate by the field engineers.
A significant number of systems delivered water with
high turbidity, which could cause problems with disinfection.
Other systems had high concentrations of nitrate particularly
in the ground water supplies of Southern California.
Many multiple water quality problems are evident in
the recommended portion of Table 14. Here, considering each
constituent separately, in every case, except for copper or
CCE, more than 50 percent of the systems that exceeded a
given Constituent Limit also exceeded the limit of some other
constituent. Overall, about 30 percent of the 238 water
supply systems exceeded more than one recommended Constituent
Limit.
In the mandatory category, the presence of coliform
organisms in densities greater than the standard was the
major problem. This will be treated in detail later in
this sub-section. The presence of the heavy metals such
as cadmium, chromium and lead in a significant number of systems
was somewhat surprising because these have mandatory limits.
Apparently, some waters are aggressive enough to cause
dissolution of these metals from the distribution piping. The
occurrence of metal concentrations exceeding limits was
more prevalent in waters with relatively low pH and specific
conductance. Therefore, a need exists for more specific
evaluation of the interrelationship between water stability and
piping.
The average water quality of a water supply system is
a legitimate measure of its overall performance, but consumers
do not drink the average water , they drink water from a
specific tap. In sampling various places in the water supply
-------
- 44 -
systems during the study, some very poor quality water was
discovered. Each of the 2,595 samples collected at a
consumer's tap, ^e facto glasses of drinking water, was checked
to see whether or not it exceeded any Constituent Limit.
In addition, the population equivalent (population served
by the system divided by the number of distribution samples
taken in the system) of each glass of water tested was
determined. This analysis showed that 36 percent of the samples
tested exceeded at least one constituent limit and the
population served the equivalent water was 2.9 million, 16
percent of the study population. This shows that a sizable"
portion of the American consumers are not receiving water
that meets Drinking Water Standards.
Table 15 indicates that over 8 percent of these
distribution samples exceeded the constituent limit for
coliform organisms, total dissolved solids, manganese, or
iron while over 4 percent of the samples exceeded the recommended
fluoride limit. Overall,30 percent of the samples drawn at
the tap had concentrations of chemicals that exceeded one
or more DWS limit.
Based on percent of study population exposed, however,
the order of major problems was as follows:
Percent of Study Population
Consti tuent Exposed to Water Exceeding Limit
Manganese 5
Iron 4
Total Dissolved Solids 3
Coliform Organ isms 2
Lead 2
Nitrate 1
Turbidity 1
CCE (Organics) 1
This table indicates that the order of prevalence is different
when using population exposed than when using percent of
samples or percent of systems.
-------
- 45 -
TABLE 15
NUMBER OF DISTRIBUTION SAMPLES EXCEEDING CONSTITUENT LIMITS
(Based on 2595 distribution samples)
All data are in mg/1 except as noted
Consti tuent
Limit
Maximum
Concentration
Found
Number
of Samples
Exceedi ng
Limit
Percent
Exceeding
Limit
RECOMMENDED
ABS
Arsenic
Boron*
Chloride
Color
Copper
CCE
Cyanide
Fluoride
Iron
Manganese
Ni trate
Radium-226
Strontium-90
Sulfate
TDS
Turbidi ty
Zi nc
MANDATORY
Arseni c
Bari urn
Boron*
Cadmium
Chromi urn
Coliform
Cyanide
Fluoride
Gross Beta
Lead
Seleni urn
Si Tver
(Hexavalent
Organisms
Activi ty
0.5
0.01
1.0
250
15 un.
1 .0
O.'ZOO
0.01
Varies
0.3
0.05
45
3 PC1/1
10 pC!/l
250
500
5 un or 1
5
0.05
1.0
5.0
iP-01
•0.05
1/100 ml
0.20
Varies
1000 pCi/
0.05
0.01
0.05
0.41
0.10
3.28
1950
49
8.35
0.56
0.008
4.40
26.0
1.32
127
135.9 pC1/l
2 pCi/1
770
2760
un 53 un.
13.0
0.10
1.55
3.28
3.94
0.079
2000/100 ml
0.008
4.40
1 154 pCi/1
0.64
0.07
0.03
0
10
20
31
17
42
33
0
118
223
211
53
16
0
47
219
60
8
5
2
0
4
5
228
0
55
0
37
10
0
0
0. 4
0. 8
1.2
0. 7
2. 6
1.2
0
4. 5
8. 6
8. 1
2. 1
0. 6
0
1. 8
8. S
2. 4
0. 3
a
0. 2
<0. 1
0
0. 2
0. 2
8. 8
0
2. 2
0
1. 4
0. 4
0
a
*Proposed for inclusion in the Drinking Water Standards.
# Treated by more than disinfection
©During this study total chromium was measured and compared to the
standard.
a- These constituents were evaluated only on selected samples. The
remainder were assumed not to exceed the limit.
-------
- 46 -
Of the items included in the DWS and measured in the
study, only alkyl benzene sulfate, cyanide, silver, strontium-90,
and gross beta activity were not encountered by some consumer
in excessive quantities. Finally, as shown by the maximum
concentration in Table 15, the following constituents
were found in someone's drinking water at a concentration
exceeding the limit by 10 times or more: arsenic (recommended
limit),iron, manganese, radium-226, turbidity, cadmium,
coliform organisms, and lead. This again demonstrates that
although 59 percent of the water supply systems met the
Drinking Water Standards on the average, at some locations
in the systems studied, very poor quality water was found.
Coliform Organism Densities
The mandatory constituent limit most often exceeded
in the CWSS was the coliform organism density limit. The
limit was exceeded in 120 systems, 12 percent of the study
total. Tables 16, 17, and 18 show how these data were
related to source, size, and geographical distribution,
respectively.
Table 16 indicates that the largely inadequately treated
and unprotected spring supplies had the highest percentage of
systems exceeding the limit, while the mixed well and spring
sources were next. Well sources, although 67 percent unchlorinated,
show a relatively low percentage exceeding the limit. As
expected, the smallest communities had the poorest record
with respect to coliform densities, see Table 17. This was
confirmed by examination of the bacteriological records in
the state and local health departments. Surprisingly, the
systems serving the 10,000 to 25,000 population group were
also poor. These communities must be large enou.gh to
attempt to treat a surface source, but too small to be
able to properly accomplish the necessary treatment.
-------
- 47 -
TABLE 16
TYPE OF WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS THAT EXCEEDED THE COLIFORM DENSITY LIMIT
Type of System
Surface and Mixed
Source
Spring Source
Well Source
Well and Spring Mixed
Source
Finished Source
Special systems
Number of
Systems
166
80
496
37
106
84
Number of
Systems
Exceeding
26
30
41
11
5
7
Percent
Exceeding
16
37
8
30
S
8
Totals
969
120
12
-------
- 48 -
TABLE 17
WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS IN VARIOUS POPULATION SIZES WHERE DELIVERED
WATER EXCEEDED THE COLIFORM DENSITY LIMIT
Population
Range
<500
500-5,000
5,000-10,000
10,000-25,000
25,000-50,000
50,000-100,000
>100,000
Number of
Systems
446
315
75
59
36
16
22
Number of
Systems
Exceeding
79
29
5
5
1
1
0
Percent of
Systems
Exceeding
18
10
7
9
3
6
0
Percent
Of
Study
Popul ation
Exceeding
15
8
7
7
3
6
0
Totals
969
120
12
-------
- 49 -
TABLE 18
REGIONAL DISTRIBUTION OF WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS WHERE DELIVEREP
WATER EXCEEDED THE COLIFORM DENSITY LIMIT
DHEW
Region
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
Number of
Systems
218
221
30
22
66
88
26
20
278
Number of
Systems
Exceeding
63
12
2
0
0
8
0
4
31
Percent
Exceeding
29
5
7
0
0
9
0
20
11
Totals
969
120
12
-------
-50 -
TABLE 19
BACTERIOLOGICAL QUALITY OF DISTRIBUTED WATER RELATED
TO CHLORINATION PRACTICE
Percent of Percent
Systems of Systems
Type of System
Surface Water Source
Mixed Ground and
Surface Water Source
Spring Source
Well Source
Mixed Spring
and Well Source
All Types
Chlorination
Practiced
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
Number
of
Sy sterns
11
180
4
50
62
12
394
204
27
11
498
456
Exceedi ng
Coli form
Limit
64
7*
100
14*
39
17*
8
5*
41
27*
16
8*
Contai ni ng
Fecal
Col iforms
64
7*
100
0
32
8*
2
33
27*
7
4*
*Almost all of these systems had no chlorine residual in the
distribution system.
-------
- 51 -
Table 17 shows that the combination of small communities
and untreated springs in Region I caused 29 percent of all of
the supplies there to exceed the coliform density limit. In
the entire CWSS, 52 percent of all the systems exceeding the
coliform density limit were in Region I. Although Region IX
also has a number of non-disinfected sources,these are wells
and therefore their coliform density data are much better than
Region I. The four systems exceeding the coliform density
limit in Region VIII were all small, less than 600 population.
Three of these systems did not adequately disinfect.
Because coliform organisms and pathogens can be removed
by adequate disinfection, the coliform density findings of
the CWSS as related to disinfection practice is of interest.
About one-half of the supplies studied reported that they did
not disinfect their water, while the other half reported that
they attempted disinfection. Table 19 compares the total
coliform content and the fecal coliform content in the
distribution systems of water supply systems that do and do
not disinfect their water.
To examine the influence of disinfection practice on
various waters, these data were divided into five source types.
They show, as anticipated, that in all types a reduction in the
percent of the systems exceeding the coliform density limit
occurred when disinfection is practiced. Similar reductions
also occurred in the fecal coliform content of samples taken
from water supply systems that practice disinfection. Note
that this table again shows the generally poor bacterial
quality of spring sources. In most cases, the mere practice
of disinfection did not completely remove all of the total coliform
or fecal coliform from the distributed water. However, as
seen from the footnote of Table 19, most of these positive
results occurred in systems that disinfect, but do not maintain
a chlorine residual throughout the distribution system.
-------
- 52 -
The importance of maintaining a chlorine residual, if
coliform organisms are to be eliminated from distribution system
samples is presented in Table 20. In this table, the percent
of samples (one water supply system may have several samples
associated with it) showing the presence of total coliform
is presented. Although the practice of chlorination causes
a dramatic decline in the percent of the samples showing the
presence of total coliforms, these organisms are not eliminated
merely by claiming that chlorination is practiced. Unless
chlorine residual was maintained in the distribution system
a significant percent of the distribution samples contained
the presence of total coliform. These organisms were nearly
completely eliminated in systems that showed a trace of
chlorine residual or greater.
-------
- 5:3 -
TABLE 20
INFLUENCE OF CHLORINE RESIDUAL ON BACTERIOLOGICAL QUALITY OF
DISTRIBUTED WATER
Type of System
Surface Water Source
Mixed Ground and
Surface Water Source
Spring Source
Well Source
Mixed Spring and Well
Source
Percent of Samples Showing Positive Coliforms
Chlorinated
All Systems that
Unchlorinated Chlorinated Maintained a
Systems Systems Chlorine Residual
93
54
6
9
36
11
43
9
3
26
2
6
0
0
0
All Types
17
-------
Fluorides
The Public Health Service suggests an optimum level
of fluoride for all public water supplies as an effective
public health measure to prevent tooth decay. As stipulated
in the DWS, the optimum concentration is based on the annual
average maximum daily air temperature for the given
community and varies from 1.2 mg/1 in cooler regions of the
country to 0.7 mg/1 in the warmer areas. Fluoride
concentrations in public water supplies greater than 2 times
the optimum level constitutes grounds for rejection of the
supply, see Table 5. Excessive fluoride in drinking waters
can produce objectionable dental fluorosis, while the reduction
of as little as 0.3 mg/1 of fluoride below the optimum level
can noticeably reduce the dental health benefits. Fluoride
levels in water supply systems must, therefore, be evaluated
with respect to excessive fluorides as well as sub-optimum
levels.
In this study only 104 water supply systems were
providing drinking water containing the acceptable range
of concentration of fluoride. Many supplies contain a
natural source of fluoride, of these, only 47 happen to have
an acceptable range of fluoride concentration while 28 exceed
the recommended limit and 24 exceed the mandatory limit. Three
supplies did attempt to defluoridate, but only 1 was successful.
Fluorides were added purposefully to 41 supplies, but
14 of these were not adding enough to have the average of all
system samples in the acceptable range. One system was
even adding somewhat over the recommended limit.
The other 30 systems that were providing water within
the acceptable range of fluoride concentration were simply
buying it from another system that had a natural or man-fed
source. Obviously, better control of feeding fluorides
is necessary to achieve the full benefit of this additive.
The study indicated that of the 41 systems fluoridating, only
23 were manned by a certified operator or professional engineer.
-------
Because 24 water supply systems were distributing
water exceeding the mandatory fluoride limit at the time of
the study, greater effort should be made by the industry
to defluoridate to avoid any possibility of fluorosis
in these communities.
Organi cs
The Drinking Water Standards recommend that the carbon-
chloroform extractables (CCE) in a water supply should not
exceed 0.200 mg/1 where more suitable supplies exist or
can be made available. Table 21 indicates that nearly 90
percent of the selected supplies tested for organics had
CCE concentrations less than 0.200 mg/1. In spite of
these resul ts, one of the most prevalent consumer i.cmplaints
reported by the operators during the CWSS was tastes and
odors. This may have been caused by the reaction of chlorine
with organics that produces accentuated chlorinous tastes
and odors. Proper treatment with oxidants or adsorbants
would minimize this problem.
As another indication of the taste and odor problem,
about 20 percent of the surface source systems were practicing
taste and odor control. Of these, 82 percent were adequate
in the judgment of the field survey team.
TABLE 21
CARBON-CHLOROFORM EXTRACT DATA
Number of
Type Percent Systems Sampled
of System Exceeding Limi t of this Type
Well Source g 12
MixedGround Q 4
and Surface Source
Surface Source n 94
All Types 10 HO
-------
- 56- -
One aspect of the problem is that the carbon adsorption
method (hereafter called CAM) for monitoring, only recovers
a low percentage of the organic substances from water. First,
it does not adsorb all of the organics present, and second,
a large portion of those adsorbed are not removed by the
chloroform extraction. This indicates the need for a better
method to collect and measure the organics in drinking water.
A second problem in the area of organic sampling
is the recovery of the organics from the water in unchanged
forms. The CAM can be used as a gross indication of the
concentration of organics in water, but the residues recovered
are not always in their original form, but may be altered
by the use of solvents and heat. A need exists to recover
the organics in an unchanged form if they are to be
identified and used in determining their toxicity via animal
experiments.
During the CWSS, 160 samples were taken for pesticide
analysis from surface sources and other selected supplies.
Seven samples contained measurable quantities of pesticides.
These were Lindane - 0.16 and 0.20 yg/1 (proposed standard,
56 yg/1) and Dieldrin - 0.10 yg/1 (proposed standard, 17 yg/1),
Heptachlor - 0.20 and 0.20 yg/1 (proposed standard, 18 yg/1),
Aldrin - 0.10 yg/1 (proposed standard, 17 yg/1) and Chlordane,
0.22 yg/1 (proposed standard, 3 yg/1). An additional 80
showed a trace (detectable, but not measurable concentration)
of one or more pesticides •
Control of Health Hazards
Health hazards defined in the Public Health Service
Drinking Water Standards are "any conditions, devices or
practices in the water supply system and its operation which
create, or may create, a danger to the health and well-being
of the water consumer." Detection of such health hazards
requires a careful survey of the entire water supply system.
This section will summarize all the health hazards
uncovered during the CWSS.
-------
- 5'7 -
The health hazards found are divided into five
categories: 1) source, 2) treatment, 3) distribution systems,
4) surveillance, and 5) personnel. For comparative purposes,
some of the system deficiencies, which cause health hazards,
reported in the previous section, Summary of Results, will
be included here. The deficiencies found during this study
in the five categories noted above, are presented in Figures
2, 3 and 4. These data indicate that over one-half of the
identified deficiencies occurred in greater than 20 percent
of the plants surveyed. This indicates the prevalence of
a wide variety of health hazards in water treatment systems,
Two general areas of health hazards that are present
in a high percentage of systems are those in distribution
systems and those caused by inadequate survei1lanc°. These
two, along with operator training, which could be easily
improved, will be discussed in detail.
Cross-Connection Control
The control of cross-connections is possible through
knowledge of the problem and vigilance in preventing
unprotected connections from occurring. Fifty-four percent
of the community water supply systems surveyed did not have
a cross-connection control ordinance and about 90 percent of the
water supply systems had no program or were not effectively
implementing any existing ordinance. While many (43 percent)
of the community water supply systems were attempting to
control cross-connections on new construction, 89 percent
of the communities surveyed had no program for continuous
re-inspection for cross-connection hazards. Although
control of the hazard should begin at the treatment plant,
common division walls between finished and lesser quality
waters were observed in over six percent of the water
systems providing treatment. A progressive program to control
cross-connections was evident in only 11 percent of
the community water supplies surveyed.
-------
SOURCE
Percent of Systems
0 20 40 60
I
Inadequate Quantity (922)
Restricted Water Use (900)
Deteriorating Surface Raw Water
Quality (124)
Inadequate Source
Protection (496)
TREATMENT
(26%)
Plans and specs, not
Inspected by the State (655)
By-pass possible (375)
Common Walls (613)
Inadequate Clarification
Beyond Disinfection (162)
Inadequate Control of
Clarification Beyond
Disinfection (162)
Inadequate Disinfection (311)
Inadequate Control of
Disinfection (311)
Inadequate Records (872)
Inadequate Maintenance (901)
(29%)
(52%)
(6%)
(24%)
80
100
Fig. 2. DEFICIENCIES RELATED TO HEALTH HAZARDS- TREATMENT AND
SOURCE
*Percent with deficiencies calculated on basis of supplies where
applicable - number in parenthesis.
-------
- 59 -
Percent* of Systems
0 20 40 60
80
100
DISTRIBUTION
Pressure less than 20 psi (969)
Inadequate Distribution
Facilities (845)
Uncovered Finished Water
Rpservoirs (806)
i n
No Chlorine Residual
Distant Part of
Distribution System (457)
No Disinfection of New
and/or Repaired Mains (879)
No Cross-Connections
Control Ordinance (854)
No Effective Cross-
Connection Control
Program (837)
Cross-Connection Control
Limited to New
Construction Only (889)
No Cross-Connection Control
Program for Continuous
Re-inspection (879)
Inadequate Progress in
Cross-Connection Control
Inter-Connected with Other
Water Systems of Unknown
Quality Without
Protection (742)
(826)
(26%)
(9%)
(14%)
(57%)
(51%)
• (54%)
(43%)
(89%
'(89%
(6%)
Fig- 3. DEFICIENCIES RELATED TO HEALTH HAZARDS -.DISTRIBUTION
C y CTCM C
*Percent with deficiencies calculated on basis of supplies
where' applicable - number in parenthesis.
-------
- 60 -
Percent*of Systems
0 20 40 60
SURVEILLANCE
Does not meet Bacteriological
Surveillance Standards (969)
Nn Sanitary Survey within
the last 3 years (959)
PERSONNEL
(Chief Operator)
Less than Short School Level
Training- (969)
Inadequate Bacteriological
Training (969)
Inadequate Chemical Trainina
<162)
1
80
100
T
(64%)
h
(77%)
(46%)
Fig 4. DEFICIENCIES RELATED TO HEALTH HAZARDS - SURVEILLANCE
AND PERSONNEL
*Percent with deficiencies calculated on basis of supplies
where applicable - number in parenthesis.
-------
- .6.1 -
Survel Hance
To prevent health hazards from developing in a water
supply system, someone not associated with the supply should
review operation procedures and the adequacy of physical
facilities on a regular basis. These sanitary surveys
should be at least as detailed as the reviews made during the
Community Water Supply Survey, and may be more time-consuming
depending on the complexity of treatment and the capabilities
of the operators.
During the CWSS surveys, data were gathered on the
dates of the most recent sanitary surveys. The data are
shown in Table 22. The year 1968 was singled out as it
was the last full calendar year preceding the study.
TABLE 22
ANALYSIS OF DATE OF LAST SANITARY SURVEY
Percent of supplies reporting sanitary
surveys during:
Population Never or
Served 1968 1967-69 1960-66 did not know
<500
500-5,000
5,000-10,000
10,000-25,000
25,000-50,000
50,000-100,000
>100,000
All Supplies 22 36 8 56
13
22
33
38
24
19
37
26
40
44
51
41
50
60
8
10
8
3
5
12,
15
66
59
48
46
54
38
25
-------
CWSS engineers averaged 1.2 man-days per supply for
field work. This single visit time investment did not include
making arrangements for the field work of the preparation of
written reports of their findings. Moreover, it did not
include the all-important follow-up work with the local
officials developing improvement programs and operator
training and certification which are so necessary if the
surveys are to be effective in securing proper facilities
and effective operations.
An estimate of the national need for additional engineers
in state and local health departments for water supply surveillance
is:
Assumptions -
1. 19,236 water supplies
2. 4 man-days required per supply for plan review,
meetings with governing bodies, surveys, report
writing, training, etc.
3. 225 man-days equals 1 man-yr.
4. Personnel costs
$12,000 salary
2,500 fringe benefits
2,000 travel
500 office supplies
500 office space
2.500 1/3 secretary
$20,000
5. 21 percent of supplies now being surveyed annually
19,236 x 0.79 x 4 man-days x 1/225 - 270 men
270 man-years x $20,000 = $5.4 million per year
The average annual cost of surveillance per supply
would be 4/225 x $20,000 = approx. $350.
-------
- 63 -
Aside from costs for production quality control by the
plant personnel, two other additional costs associated with
surveillance are the laboratory costs for the additional
bacteriological and chemical analyses required to meet the
1962 U.S. Public Health Service Drinking Water Standards.
Examination of 10 percent of the systems in the CWSS chosen
at random showedthat these systems averaged 20 bacteriological
samples below the standards per year. Assuming a laboratory
cost of $10 per sample and 19,236 water supply systems in
the country, $3.8 million per year is needed for these
additional analyses. In the area of chemical analysis, only
10 percent of the systems studied measured the concentration of
the constituents in Table 5 during the previous year. The 1962
U.S. Public Health Service Drinking Water Standards state, "Under
normal circumstances, analyses for substances listed oelow
[essentially Table 5] need only be made semiannual ly.'! Taking a
laboratory cost of $150 to determine all of these constituents,
an approximate cost of $5.2 million per year is needed for
these analyses. Summing these three surveillance costsyields
a figure of approximately $14 million to upgrade the nation's
surveillance program.
Operator Experience and Training
The engineer making the water supply survey obtained
information on experience and training from the principal
operator at the treatment facility. This was the person
whose wrong acts or failures to act could adversely affect
water quality.
The results are presented in Table 23. The basic
education level is relatively high. Only 16 percent failed
to finish .high school. However, 61 percent reported they
had no water treatment training at the short school level or
higher. Training was markedly lacking in microbiology and
chemistry. Assuming that on-the-job training is how-to-do-it
rather than the learning of fundamental why-we-do-it concepts,
77 percent were deficient in microbiological training and
-------
- 64 -
TABLE 23
OPERATOR EXPERIENCE AND TRAINING
(All numbers are percent of responses)
Percent
Education Level - High School or better 84
Water Treatment Training 39
Short Course or better
Number of previous positions 58
None
Training in Sanitary Microbiology
None 63
On-the-Job 14
Training in Chemistry (systems with more than
disinfection)
At short school or higher level 54
None or on-the-job 46
Full Time Operators 4?
Staff adequate in (operator's opinion)
Number 83
Knowledge 89
Salary
$7,500/yr or less 84
$2,000/yr or less Z7
Operators with more than 20 years experience 43
Operators with less than 2 years experience 15
Operators with less than 2 years experience 35
who are also part-time operators
-------
- 65 -
72 percent (overall) in chemistry. Chemistry training responses
from facilities having more than disinfection treatment are
more meaningful than overall figures. Forty-six percent of
those operators were deficient in chemical training. Also
note that 11 percent considered their staff lacking in water
treatment knowledge. These untrained personnel are often
unaware of the hazards to the consuming public that might
result when water of substandard quality is produced. As
an example, 9 percent of the supplies using gas chlorination
reported interruptions to the disinfection process while
changing cylinders, a completely unnecessary hazard to the
consumer.
Of interest to the water supply industry is the 43
percent of the operators reporting more than 20 years
experience. Their replacement represents a large manpower
need during the next few years as they reach retirement
age. Twenty percent of the operators reported less than 2
years water purification experience, so it appears new men
are entering the field and there should be no personnel shortage
providing compensation and job opportunities are attractive
enough to retain them. Only 23 percent of these short-time
experience operators are employed full-time by the water
utility;which is disquieting. Some of them are full-time
municipal employees having responsibilities in sewage treatment,
building inspection, street maintenance or other departments.
Others are employed by investor-owned companies and operate
2 or more water supplies for their employer. Some of these
persons have entered the water supply field, but there were
no data collected to permit an estimate of their number.
With percentages rounded to whole numbers, the error from
this source is within the precision of the measurement. Thus,
the CWSS shows that 43 percent of the operators have more than
20 years experience and are approaching.;retirement and
only 5 percent of the operators are new to the field (less
than 2 years water purification experience) and working
full-time to operate their supplies.
-------
- 66 -
The 37 percent earning less than $2QOO per year include
most of the part-time operators. With about half the operators
reporting earning between $2000 and $7500 per year and only
16 percent making more than $7500 (29 percent of the full-time
operators), compensation may be an important factor in operator
retention.
Effect of Size on Operation and Hater Quality
The data suggest some benefits that may accrue from
regional ization of water supplies. The first benefit would be
reduced costs of health department surveillance. The CWSS
included 547 systems that served less than 1,000 persons and 214
that served 1,000 to 5,000 persons. Although many of the small
systems served isolated towns and subdivisions, the small systems
are numerous enough to offer some possibility of mergers, reducing
health department needs for men and money by 4 man-days, and $350
each year per system eliminated.
Table 24 compares data relating to laboratory control of
treatment, experience and demonstrated capabilities of operators,
and the water quality records for the previous year by population
groups.
TABLE 24
EFFECT OF SIZE ON OPERATION AND WATER QUALITY
Item <1000 1000-5000 >50,000
Supplies having
bacteriological laboratory 2% 7% 72%
Supplies with operators
having more than 5 yrs.
experience 53% 75% 94%
Supplies with certified
operators ll% 39% 88%
Supplies that met the
bacteriological criteria
11 of the previous 12
months of record 7% 12% 24%
Al1 data calculated as percent of responses to the individual
questions.
-------
- 67 -
Table 24 indicates that the larger systems provide
better laboratory control, attract and hold better operators
and have an increased probability of meeting the bacteriological
surveillance criteria. Therefore, if smaller towns are close
enough together to make their merger feasible, they might
perform more like the larger communities shown in Table 24.
This improvement in operation would benefit their customers,
as well as ease the burden of surveillance that is presently
on the state and local health departments.
-------
- 68 -
PARTICIPANTS
The following persons made major contributions to the
successful completion of this project
PROJECT DIRECTION
Leland J. McCabe - Project Director
Roger D. Lee - Assistant Director for Field Activities
Gordon G. Robeck - Assistant Director for Report Writing
William N. Long - Assistant Director for Public Information
FIELD EVALUATION TEAM
T.
G.
E.
H.
T.
R.
W.
E.
L.
F.
K.
M.
N.
N.
R.
C.
Campbel 1
Craun
Ernstrom
Holman
Hushower
Jungclaus
Keating
Lippy
W.
G.
V.
A.
T.
E.
W.
D.
J.
B.
E.
F.
M.
J.
J.
.J.
P.
H.
E.
P.
E.
C.
E.
L.
C.
A.
Beck
Burns
Cabelli
Dufour
E r i c k s e n
Geldrei ch
Heffernan
Hissong
Hoff
Huntley
Katz
Kopfler
Levin
T.
0.
F.
F.
W.
H.
Mrs
W.
G.
LABORATORY
R.
A.
J.
E.
R.
S.
B.
A.
L.
D.
D.
J.
A.
L. Lothrop
T. Love, Jr.
L. Nelson
W. Norris , Jr.
S. Rynearson
F. Smith , Jr.
. Verna Tilford
J. Whitsell
A. Wright
SUPPORT
J. Lishka
R. Malcolm
Mayer
F. McEarren
W. Jills
T. Mulawka
H. Pringle
A. Stevens
C. Trombley
J. Van Donsel
C. Wallace
D. Weeks
S. Zygmuntowicz
-------
- 69 -
DATA PROCESSING
Mrs. Grace Bardo
J. H. Cook
P. C. Karalekas,
L. J. McCabe
D. L. McMahan
Jr,
REPORT PREPARATION
T,
J,
J
T
L.
K.
M.
N.
Campbel1
Carswel1
Dennis
Hushower
R. D. Lee
Mrs. Maura Lilly
G. G. Robeck
J. M. Symons
W. J. Whitsell
-------
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The Community Water Supply Study was made possible
by the joint participation of all personnel in the Bureau
of Water Hygiene. The cooperation of the state and local
health departments involved and the utilities studied
is gratefully acknowledged. Finally, special thanks is
given to the Ad Hoc Advisory Committee for their review
and comments on this study and report. This Committee
included:
Earnest F. Gloyna - The University of Texas
Henry J. Graeser - City of Dallas
Henry J. Ongerth - State of California
Gerald T. Orlob - Water Resources Engineers, Inc.
Conrad P. Straub - The University of Minnesota
John E. Trygg - State of Louisiana
John E. Vogt - State of Michigan
-------
- 71 -
APPENDICES
Page
1. Forms Used in the Study 72
2. Listing of Water Supply Systems Studied 86
Vermont 86
New York, N.Y. 91
Charleston, W. Va. 96
Charleston, S. C. 97
Cincinnati, Ohio, Kentucky, Indiana 98
Kansas City, Missouri, Kansas 100
New Orleans, Louisiana 102
Pueblo, Colorado 103
San Bernardino, Riverside, Ontario,Calif. 104
3. Glossary of Terms no
-------
8.5. KPMnKMT OF HEALTH. EOOTAtIO*. MO HELFAHf
Pabtie IM«lth Strvict
(2*«9) Concimor Protection end EnvironMittal Health Service
Enti rvn>ent*l Control Malnutrition
INVENTORY OF MUNICIPAL IATE» FACILITIES Bureau of later Hygiene
| LATEST DATA IN PHS FILES |
COMMUNITY
1
NUMBER OF
SERVICES
NUMBER OF
METERS
S
RATED
PLANT
CAPACITY
MGC
Av'ERAGE
PtANT
OUTPUT
MGD
9
_; ° SOLPCE; OF
u
POPULATION
ESTIMATED
POPULATION
SERVED
2
SUPPLY
6 7
TREATMENT
10
YEAR
OPED.
STARTED
PRESENT
SUPPLY ._
PRESENT £
TREAT' 5
MEtiT *
PLANT 0
3 4
SAFE YIELD
IMPOUNDED
MG
MAXIMUM
DEFEND. DRAFT
(GR. »ATER)
.MG
a
DISTRI-
BUTION
STORAGE
PUMPED
TO
MAINS
II
IMPROVEMENTS
NEEDED
12
FORM APPROVED:
BUDGET SUREAU NO.
| CURRENT DATA |
COMMUNITY OR FACILITY
CovnecT '£;9Qc!TIO*"iflkr'
(I) a
«.
Portal oJJrcs* of u4-ili-ty
COUNTY
(1) b
IS)
CLASSIFICATION
RESIDENTIAL a
COMMERCIAL b
INDUSTRIAL C
PUBLIC d
TOTAL e
RATED
CAPACITY
MGD (8) a
AVERAGE <«' b
OUTPUT MGD
EMERGENCY POWER
(8) C
REMARKS
NUMBER NUMBER
OF OF MGD
SERVICES METERS *VG. WATER
STATE
I960
CENSUS
POPULATION
(2) a
CURRENT
ESTIMATED
POPULATION
SERVED
(2) b
SOURCE OF SUPPLY
(«)
TREATMENT
(9) a
a.
X
(A
oe
bj
LAB. £
CONTROL 0
0) (4|
SAFE YIELD
IMPOUNDED
MG (7)3
MAXIMUM
DRAFT (GR. WATER)
MG (7) b
DIST. STORAGE
PUMI>MG- I?0?aINS ."*«V*MENTS
111 ' NttULU
GRAVITY
TO MAINS l '
MG
(10) b
PHS USE
ro
i
-------
- 73 -
MUNICIPAL WATER SUPPLY SANITARY SURVEY
BOB #85-369004
Exp. March 1970
SURVEY DATE
1 =
I
(for office use oiv
COOP, ow EvtRY CARD)
2, Name of supply
3.
post office
PRESENT
common name, if different
10-YR. ESTIMATE UNKNOWN
I
24
3&
1
A
I
A
1
?6
4o
30
54
5. Water use has been restricted
any one year of the past 5 years.*1*
times for a total of
57
days during
6. LABORATORY CONTROL
' ' ' ' i"* p*
A. Bacteriological (Distribution system only) .»•» j^O87T_fcLlJ
(1) Min. number sanples recommended per month by PHS
A(2) Avg. nuaber/month for last 12 months
. • \
3) Range of least and most monthly
samples
from
Number of months the Drinking Water Standards were
-^ «2££not met during the last 12 months for:
£*(a) Quality
) Number of samples
3.2-D.WS.
M\
<
(c) NONE collected tM@ g&m^iGQ *OtT «=_ fiVlfit
«°<5) Are samples representative_of distribution aystem?wUO
I
Are samples representative of distribution system?
Hhrem m&& &f di©vtrifcurjon oy^kfwi.
(6) Are check samples collected as provided for in the I
Drinking Water Standards? SftC ^. 15"" D. W. S • ' ' ye8
(7) Are samples requiring check samples reported
(8) Is the laboratory Certified? ^ ®?
(a) Within the past £^%
(b) &&*f&!*%o one or both, by whom was it certified.
\t^
(9) Are sanples received by lab within 30 hours?
IA.
Zfe
ZB.
as.
yes
yes
yes
State
yes
3S.
12.
no
no :
no
no
PHS
no
35,
EGA-19
-------
B.
- 74 -
'leal (finished water only)
Samples of finished water are analyzed each
D
Mame on each
2 years,
3 years,
3C.
>nth,
Infrequently
Type of analysis:
year,
never.
Date of last chemical analysis 4
Analyzed by
utility,
state,
PHS,
university,
15)
51 52.
Tests run for operational control and their frequency are:
Tests
other.
Continuous Each shift
Alkalinity I^J 1 1
Aluminum 1 1 1 1
Chloride I—.,. J
Chlorine residual t^J 1 1
(evo CAJID 7i*o) [2] I 1 'I
Color *° ,,_! 1 1
Fluoride 1 1 „-,.
Hardness 1^1 1 — 1
Iron 1 1 -If*
Jar tests L^J I_QJ
1 1 A*
Manganese I __ I N*
JO ^9 ___
pH 0^.° D
Taste & Odor l^gJ 1 1
Turbidity LJ 1 1
Zeta potential 1 -1 1 1
Qfrh«»T _ 1 I I
C. Radioactivity
(1) Samp JOB ar« analyzed each 1 month,
infrequently never. (en
^3 "*4 . -
(2) Date of 1/tst radiological analysis
13 mo
(3) Analyzed by utility. state. 1 1 I
Daily
U
n
n
n/
«n
n
___
n
n
n
n
year, | | 2 y
-ii
to e^^o 3) 13
CP
t**9 irequenr.
Meekly than WMklr
D p
n P
» 0
^ v t
n Q
n p
— ' P
n p
n u
c p
Zl r
i i ;
n Q
n Q
n n
*.7
ears, | | 3 years,
it
}
day yr /«
»HST 1 J university. other.
/9
Zi
-------
- 75 -
7. SANITARY SURVEY
A. Date of most recent survey tt
B. Survey made by: L I state,
31
54
utility,
local health department,
C. Facilities surveyed:
storage,
consultant. "Survey" requires wn44e
" -^rapar-f af ^-J
Ament,
source,
distribution.
transmission,
trei
8. FACILITIES & OPERATION (describe deficiencies on reverse side)
A. Are there common walls between finished and lesser quality water?
»»
B. Are there inter-connections to other systems
(1) of known acceptable quality
(2) of unknown quality
(a) with protection MoV& !*1OW prfeTeCTfeO
(b) without protection
C. Is there a cross-connection control program
(1) on new construction only
(2) for continuous re-inspection
D. Are finished water reservoirs properly covered?
E. Is there detectable chlorine residual in distant parts of the
distribution system?
F. Can the treatment plant be by-passed?
G. Are there satisfactory procedures to:
(1) prevent personal accidents
(2) prevent chlorine accidents
(3) disinfect all new and/or repaired distribution system mains,
valves, fittings, including check samples before being
placed in service?
H. Are there areas of low pressure ( < 20 psi) in the distribution
system under maximum water use?
I. Operating problems most often encountered are:
phenols,
corrosive water,
short filter runs,
YES NO
35.
SL.
53
as
S7
S3
D
taste & odor
other, specify.
ECA-19
-------
- 76 -
8. FACILITIES & OPERATION, continued
J. Chlorination process was interrupted
72 73
time*
in the last 12 months.
(1) Interruptions were due to: I I chlorinator failure,
feedwater pump, I _ (changing cylinders, LJ power failure,
other, explain.
76 (END CARO 4-)
80
K. Percent of land area within service area where water is
available (nearest whole percent) I. I I I 1.
13 1C
L. Were plans and specs, for treatment plant approved by the state?
YES NO
o g
YES
9. SOURCE, TRliATMENT & DISTRIBUTION (describe deficiencies on reverse «id«) I
A. Are the following adequate:
(1) Source, with respect to the following:
(a) quantity
(b) bacteriological quality
(c) chemical quality
(d) physical quality
(e) adequate protection
(2) Transmission of raw water
(3) Is the raw water sampled for:
(a) Bacteriological contamination
(b) Chemical contamination
(4) Treatment, with respect to the folowing:
(a) aeration
(b) chemical feed , capacity
(c) chemical feed, stand-by equipment
(d) chemical mixing
(e) flocculation
k.CA-19
-------
- 77 -
9. SOURCE, TREATMENT & DISTRIBUTION, continued
A. Are the following adequate (continued):
(4) Treatment, continued:
(f) settling
(g) recarbonation
(h) filtration A 4* HO TIT) ft I
(i) disinfection, capacity
(J) disinfection, stand-by equipment
(k) taste & odor control
(1) fluoridation
(5) Distribution, with respect to the following
(a) storage
(b) booster chlorinttion
(c) high service pumping
(d) booster pumping
(e) pressure
e
(6) Maintenance
(7) Records for:
(a) disinfection
(b) filter runs
(c) chemical consumption
(d) operational control tests
(e) bacteriological examinations
(8) Cross-connection control
(a) ordinance
(b) program implementation
(c) progress
YtiS
51
££.
Si.
M.
Sfc
AS.
feS
76.
/7
NO
3S
IT
JU.
UL
fa"?
70
•Iz.
74
7fc
71
7*1
vs
17
cs
EGA-19
-------
- 78 -
9. SOURCE, TREATMENT & DISTRIBUTION, continued
B. During the past 3 years, raw water quality has L^
deteriorated, or
zi
stayed the same.
laproved,
10. PERSONNEL
A. Water Purification Operator
This is -l-hc
• Kldl
(1) Highest level of formal education: | _ J 8th grade or less,
it
high school,
technical or trad
(2) Level of training in water
ade school,
other,
techni
V •
none,
1.
collea
university.
si
(3) Len
_l ahortIschool,
on the job,
s job:
0?
ars,
55
months.
ons as water treatment operator
(4) Number of previous1
** ^°
(5) Total ?Mrs of water purification experience
3C> 37
(6) Level of study in sanitary microbiology:
'technical or trade school,
other, specify,—
•10
short school,
36
college course,
44
none,
42,
on the job,
(7) Level of study in water chemistry:
or trade school,
48
short school,
college course,U_Jtechnical
none,
on the job,
so
51
other, specify.
(8) Is the operator a full-time employee?
(9) Salary range (per year) of operator:
_ $5,000-7,499
yes
no
$7,500-9,999
<*1,999
$10,000
ss
$2,000-4,999
-19
-------
- 79 -
10. PERSONNEL, continued
A. continued
(10) Is your present staff adequate in:
(a) number
(b) quality
£2.
yes
yes
fei ' 63
no
no
B. Operator's major complaint
0|t"tl0lt
C. Most frequent customer's complaint;
\lttq lay
D. Management's most frequent complaint:_
EGA-19
-------
-SO-
11. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
A. Bonded indebtedness: (water supply)
(1) General obligation bonds
$
(a) statutory limit
(2) Revenue bonds
(a) statutory limit
B. Capital stock, par value
bonds, par value
C. Hater funds are
kept separate or
fffm
/-*
Z9
4S
i OK
J
•
i
. mine led
t^
ZO
^fe
• £NC>
•
•
•
•
•
sz
with other funds
D. Is there an annual payment to the general fund?
E. Operation is controlled by: \mj mayor-council,
independent water board,
se
mayor-commissibn
othei;
F. Is there active planning for expansion or improvement? LJyes l_J
* I I I I I I
(1) Value of planned improvement
(2) Planning by utility
no
(3) Planning by consultants
yes
yes
U i " 1
70
no
no
uitlity only
6. If expansion is planned, it will be carried out within:
1 YR. 2-5 TRS. 6-10 IRS.
eo
(1) Source
(2) Treatment
(3) Distribution
(4) Other
D
Zi.
H. Costs of production:
(1) Chemicals
(2) Labor, power, etc.
(3) Depreciation
(4) Other, including office, administration,
meter reading, collection, etc.
(5) Total
CENTS/1,000 GALLONS
1A-19
-------
- 81 -
11. FINANCIAL INFORMATION, continued
I. Tariff (Residential)
(1) Connection fee
(2) Sale
(a)
(b)
(0
s unit is
47
S2
4f
per 1,000 gallons
cents for the first
cents for the next
cents for the next
-c
$0 si
Op SCm
Jper 100 cu. ft.
units
r
units
units
97 *o */
(d) etc. as needed to cover steps.
all
flat rafe htrc
-------
ECU- 9 (CIN)
(1-68)
1. LOCATION OF WATER SUPPLY _i
FOR OFFICE
USE ONLY
C^,
2. WATER SUPPLY NAME O Q.
3. DATE OF SAMPLING BEGINNING
OF COMPOS
1 — [TREATMENT
4. SAMPLE FROM [_J PLANT
8
5. SAMPLING POINT
LOCATION AND/OR . ,
DESCRIPTION t.e.kr
8. TYPE OF 1 — (FINISHED
WATER SAMPLED | |
8
7. SOURCE OF 1 — (SURFACE
WATER
8
8. SAMPLING | — (COMPOSITE
METHOD 1 1
8
9. ANALYSIS 1 — (ORGANIC
REQUIRED
8
10. WATER i— (COMMUNITY
SUPPLY WATER
PITFpnDY cnnni w
11. APPEARANCE OF SAMPLE
12. ADDITIONAL REMARKS
la.nmiFCTED HY
IIR SIMPLE MO.
UNITED STATES PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE - 82 - SERIAL NO.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL ADMINISTRATION ' 9441
BUREAU OF WATER HYGIENE pUNCH ,N ^^
IDENTIFICATION OF WATER SAMPLE ' 6
^Ginne as on in\/2n+or\/
CITY, COUNTY, STATE
H
7 1 8
mg CLS on inv/gn+or
MO. DAY ENDING DATE MO.
UAlb I •""' 01- COMPUSIIb '
ITF ] OR niTF (IF
19 22 GRAB SAMPLE 23
— (WELL | — (RESERVOIR | — (DISTRIB
1 1 II SYST
4 2 1
i i
| (PARTIALLY | 1 RAW
1 | TREATED
4 2
GROUND COMBINED
4 2
"" UKAB
4
IKACE Wbl 1 I HAUIU-
ELEMENTS | (CHEMICA
4 2 1
ICWS ~~ 1-bObRAL | (SPbCIAL
INSTALLATION | | STUDY
4 2 1
—
DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE
DATE RFP.FIVFn
/
DO NOT
WRITE BELOW-
-y THIS LINE
DAY YR.
28
JTION | — (OTHER FH
EM II
0 29
30
DOT"E" D
0 33
— (OTHER 1 —
0 34
OIHbK
0 35
1' (OTHbH
L LJ [_
0 36
( lOIHbR
0 37
USPHS OTHER
STAFF '
I 8°
32
39
LABORATORY REMARKS
OVER FOR INSTRUCTIONS
-------
- 83 -
INSTRUCTIONS: EVERY ITEM OF INFORMATION REQUIRED FROM THE SAMPLER IS
NUMBERED (1 THROUGH 13). THESE ARE THE ONLY RESPONSES
THE SAMPLER SHOULD MAKE. NOTE AREAS MARKED "DO NOT
WRITE BELOW THIS LINE" AND "FOR OFFICE USE ONLY."
ITEM 1 SHOULD BE THE LOCATION OF THE WATER SUPPLY FA-
CILITY WHICH PRODUCED THE WATER FOR THE SAMPLE.
(EXAMPLE: CINCINNATI, HAMILTON, OHIO.)
ITEM 2 SHOULD BE THE FULL NAME OF THE WATtR SUPPLY
FACILITY. (EXAMPLE: CINCINNATI MUNICIPAL WATER
WORKS)
ITEMS 4, 6, 7, AND B - CHECK THE BOX WHICH APPLIES
ITEMS 9 AND 10 - CHECK ONE OR MORE BOXES AS NECESSARY
ITEMS 3. 5, 11, 12, AND 13 SHOULD BE SELF-EXPLANATORY
ANY RESPONSE OF "OTHER" OR "SPECIAL STUDY" SHOULD BE EXPLAINED UNDER
ITEM 12 - ADDITIONAL REMARKS.
IF NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE IDENTIFICATION OR EXPLANATION, PLEASE FEEL FREE
TO USE THE BACK OF THE ORIGINAL (WHITE) COPY OR ATTACH AN ADDITIONAL PAGE
OF LIKE SIZE.
DISTRIBUTION:
MAIL ORIGINAL (WHITE COPY) TO:
WATER QUALITY REGJSTER BRANCH
BUREAU OF WATER HYGIENE
222 E. CENTRAL PARKWAY
CINCINNATI. OHIO 45202
BLUE ENCLOSED WITH ORGANIC SAMPLE
PINK ENCLOSED WITH TRACE METAL SAMPLE
YELLOW ENCLOSED WITH WET CHEMISTRY SAMPLE
GREEN ENCLOSED WJTH RADIOCHEMICAL SAMPLE
TAN RETAINED BY REGIONAL OFFICE OR SAMPLER
-------
- 84 -
REPORT OF WATER SUPPLY USED ON INTERSTATE CARRIERS
FOR USE OF PHS REGIONAL OFFICE
(Location code)
I. NAME OF WATER SUPPLY FACILITY
LOCATION (City, County, Staff)
2. WATER SUPPLY OFFICIAL CONTACTED (None and Title)
3. 01
kTE THIS
MO.
S. POPULATK
n*«re«( hurt
SUR
/EY MADE
DAY YR.
?N SERVE
4nd)
4. I
D BY DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (To the
A "
3ATE Of LAST PHS - STATE
MO. DAY
•
0. OWNERSHIP
1 = Public
2 = Private
JOINT SURVEY
YR.
7. SOURCE
1 = Surface I I
2 = Ground 1 1
3 = Combination ' 1
a. TREATMENT USED _- I = YES, 2 = NO
I I Disinfection
Lime Softening
Coagulation
Ion Exchange
Rapid Sand
Filtration
Settling
Fluoridation
Iron Removal
Taste and Odor
Control
Other (II r»»
dtmcrib* under 13).
9. LOCAL WATER SUPPLY PROGRAM I = YES, 2 = NO
A. Is there a continuous program, such as a cross-connection survey, to detect health hazards and sanitary defects
within the water distribution system?
B. If there is a program such as described in "A" above are sanitary defects and health hazards being removed
systematically and at a rate which is satisfactory?
C. Does the community have an adequate plumbing code, such as the National Plumbing Code, or are there rules and
regulations prohibiting connections or arrangements by which liquids, steams, gasses, or chemicals of unsafe,
unknown, or questionable quality may be discharged or drawn into the public water supply?
D. Are there provisions to enforce such code or rules and regulations on new construction?
— —on major repairs and reconstruction?
E. Are the principal plant operators certified or licensed under a state program?
is such certification or licensing compulsory?
CHEMICAL ANALYSIS (mg./1) (A blonk Indjcot.i no r.port)
10.
M
Alkalinit
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromiun
Cyanide
Fluoride
Lead (.0
Hardness
Selenium
>.-
y (as
.05)*
1.0)*
(.01)
i Hex
(.2)**
5)** •
(as Q
ft01)
D
CaC
'(.01
,.
kY
0.)
*- -
YH.
--
fl
avalent (.05)** C
CDs
1
1
Date last chemical sample taken
How often are chemical analyses made?
•
Silver (.05)**
ABS(.5)*
Chloride (250)*
Copper (1 0)* - - -
CCE (2)*
Iron f ?)• •
Manganese (.05)*
Nitrate (NO? (45
Phenols (.001)*
Sulfates (250)*
|
.1111
« ..
1
C
C
.
:
j
n
~n
n
m
TDS (500)* 1 {
Zinc (5 0)* --------
pH
'RECOMMENDED MAXIMUM "MAXIMUM CHEMICAL LIMITS -MG/L
PHYSICAL AND RADIOCHEMICAL ANALYSIS
How often are physical analyses made?
PHYSICAL
Turbidity (5 s.u.)
Color (15su)-------------
Odor (3 s.u.)
Avg. Air Temp. (»F)®
.u
• D
RADIOCHEMICAL
a ft
SR*° (10/^c/l)*
RA226 nuiic/n*--- — ...........
GROSS BETA (1000 W*c/D* |_
GROSS ALPHA
SR«e
I'"
* Limits from 1962 PHS Drinking Water Sta
ndi
trd
:ti
:R
PHS-682 (REV. 10-64)
-------
- 85 -
BACTERIOLOGICAL EXAMINATIONS
12.
Minimum number of samples
required per month©
NAMES OF LABORATORY CERTIFYING AUTHORITIES
MONTH
AND
YEAR
MO.
YR.
NUMBER
Oc
SAMPLES
LABORATORIES
TUBE METHOD
n 10 ML. OR [~] 100 ML. STANDARD PORTIONS
NUMBER
NUMBER
POSITIVE
©
%
POSITIVE
©
.
.
.
.
SAMPLES HAVING
3 OR MORE 10 ML.
OR 5 100 ML.
PORTIONS-.
POSITIVE ®
NUMBER
% POSITIVE
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.-
.
.
DATES OR MOST RECENT
LABORATORY C ER Tl FIC A TIpNS
MEMBRANE FILTER METHOD
MONTH
AND
YEAR
MO.
YR.
NUMBER
OF
SAMPLES
MEAN
COLIFORM
'DENSITY
PET»
100 ML.
®
.
.
.
.
.
,
|.
SAMPLES HAVING
COLIFORM DENSI-
TIES EXCEEDING
3/50, 4/100, 7/200,
13/500 MLS.
f*
NUMBER
% POSITIVE
,
t
•
t
.
t
.
—
Footnotes:
1. See Figure 1 PHS Drinking Water Standards (1962)
2. Any member of the coliform group of bacteria.
3. Should not exceed 10% per month, if 10 ml. portions are used, or 60% if 100 ml. portions are used.
4. If 10 ml. portions are used, should not exceed 5% in 20 or more samples per month nor one sample in less than 20 per month; if
100 ml. portions are used, should not exceed 20% in 5 or more samples per month nor one sample in less than 5 per month.
5. The arithmetic means density of all standard samples per month shall not exceed 1 per 100 ml.
6. Should not exceed 5% in 20 or more samples per month, nor 1 sample in less than 20 per month.
7. Maximum daily air temperature average for at least 5 years.
13. COMMENTS: (Use additional sheet II necessary. Furnish complete description every three years)
REVIEWING ENGINEER (Name and Title)
AGENCY
CLASSIFICATION RECOMMENDED
1—Approved
2—Provisionally Approved
3—Prohibited
EXPIRATION DATE (11 provisionally approved)
DATE OF REVIEW
SIGNATURE OF STATE HEALTH OFFICIAL
TITLE IF OTHER THAN REVIEWER
PHS-682 (BACK)
REV. 10-64
-------
LISTING OF WATER SUPPLIES FROM THE »C*»SS»
100000000000 STATE OF VERMONT1
It 0. *
POP*
150r05600100
150008400070
150011100020
150011150020
130014000140
190019*00060
190*25200030
190028000120
190028090120
190028060120
190030800100
190036400100
190039200090
190042000130
130044900130
190090400020
190053950120
190059000140
190062100090
1900*3090040
190070000090
190"75700110
190078400130
150*84*50140
150092400010
150100800040
130103*00120
1901049.90080
190109100080
190117*00090
190120500110
190123120140
190128800110
150128850110
150137100140
150i45850040
190149860040
190i 45730040
150148400050
150154000100
150156800100
150159600100
150162400110
150165200110
150168000030
150170900100
150173*00100
19017*400020
15017*100120
15C184840120
I. 0. *
163
600
1500
045
075
350
200
10387
250
120
1100
200
350
4500
100
9000
290
600
090
180
1700
2000
11000
025
1900
65000
225
100
250
1000
900
600
260
050
1400
300
150
880
060
130
035
200
062
1000
600
400
4000
800
350
050
POP.
NAME OF SUPPLY
BOX T
CITY HALL
CITY HALL
BOX 84
CITY HALL
BOX 547
32 PERRY ST.
CITY HALL
ALBANY WATER SUPPLY co.
ALBURG WATER OEPT.
ARLINGTON WATER COMPANY
REC MOUNTAIN WATER CO.
SScUTNEY WATER SUPPLY
BAxERSFIELD WATER WORKS
DUNBAR WATER SYSTEM
BARRE WATER DEPT.
CENTRAL VERMONT HOSPITAL
KERRY WATER SYSTEM
BARTON VILLAGE WATER DEPT.
•EEBE WATER WKS.(BEEB£ PLAIN,VT)
RIVERSIDE WATER WORKS, INC.
BELLOW FALLS V. WATER OEPT.
BELMQNT MOBILE COURT WATER SUP. ROCKINGHAM
BENNiNGTON WATER OEPT. BURGESS ROAD
BERLIN WATEP SUPPLY
BETHEL WATER DISTRICT
MARSHALL WATER co CBLOOMFIELD)
BOLTON VALLEY SKI AREA WATER SYS
BRADFORD WATER DEPT.
BRANQON FIRE DISTRICT * 1
BRATTLEBORO WATER DEPT.
BRlDEWATER WOOLEN CO.
BRISTOL WATER DEPT.
BURLINGTON WATER DEPARTMENT
CABOT WATER DEPARTMENT
«ADY FALLS WATER SUPPLY
CAMBRIDGE VILLAGE WATER DEPT.
CANAAN WATER DPEARTMENT
CASTLETON FIRE DISTRICT NO. 1
CAvENDlSH FIRE DISTRICT NO. 2
CENTER RUTLAND WATER DEPT F.D
FLO"EY W»TER SYSTEM
CHESTER TOWN hATER DEPT.
COLCHESTER PROPERTIES WATER SUP.
NOURSES SYSTEM-COLCHESTER WATER SUPPLY
COLCHESTER FIRE DISTRICT NO. 3
CONCORD VILLAGE WATER DEPT. CONCORD COMMUNITY WATER SYSTEMS
COVENTRY FIRE DISTRICT NO. 1
CRAFTSBURY WATER OEPT.
CRAFTSBURY COMMON WATER COMPANY CITY HALL
CUTTINGSVILLE WATER DEPT. CITY HALL
DANBY-MT. TABOR FIRE DISTRICT
DANVILLE FIRE DISTRICT NO. 1 TOWN CLERK OFFICE
DERBY CENTER WATER DEPT.
INTERNATIONAL WATER CO.
BORSET FIRE DISTRICT CITY HALL
DUXBuRY WATER COMPANY 4 PARK AVENUE
WEEP ROCK WATER CO.
NAME OF SUPPLY
CITY HALL
CITY HALL
CITY HALL
CITY HALL
1PRUDENTIAL COMM. FIRE DlST. 1
ALBANY* VERMONT 09820
ALBURG* VERMONT 09440
BENNINGTON. VERMONT 09201
ARLINGTON* VERMONT 09290
ASCUTNEY, VERMONT 09030
BAKERSFIELD. VT. 09441
BARNET* VERMONT 09821
BARRE. VERMONT 09*41
BARRE. VERMONT 09641
BARRE. VERMONT 09*41
BARTON, VERMONT 09822
BEEBE. QUEBEC. CANADA
BEECHER FALLS* VERMONT 09902
BELLOW FALLS, VERMONT 09101
BELLOW FALLS. VERMONT 09101
BENNINQTON. VERMONT 09201
BARRE. VERMONT 09*41
BETHEL* VERMONT 09032
NORTH STRATFORD* N.H. 03990
WATERBURY* VERMONT 09676,
BRADFORD* VERMONT 09033
BRANDON, VERMONT 09733
BRATTLEBORO* VERMONT 09301
BRIDGEWATER, VERMONT 09034
BRISTOL* VERMONT 09443
BURLINGTON, VERMONT 09401
CABOT. VERMONT 09647
MORRISVILLE* VERMONT 09*41
CAMBRIDGE* VERMONT 09444
CANAAN* VERMONT 09903
CASTLETON* VERMONT 09739
CAVENDISH* VERMONT 09142
CENTER RUTLAND, VERMONT 0973*
CENTER RUTLAND, VERMONT 0973*
CHESTER DEPOT* VERMONT 03144
COLCHESTER. VERMONT 0444*
COLCHESTER* VERMONT 09,44*
COLCHESTER* VERMONT 09446
CONCORD, VERMONT 09824
COVENTRY. VERMONT 09829
CRAFTSBURY* VERMONT 09826
CRAFTSBURY, VERMONT 09827
CUTTINGSVILLE, VERMONT 09738
DANBY. VERMONT 09739
DANVILLE. VERMONT 09828
DERBY CENTER 09829
DERBY LINE* VERMONT 09830
DORSET* VERMONT 09291
WATERBUHV. VERMONT 09*7*
EAST BARRE, VERMONT 09*49
00
01
'FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT THE REGIONAL REPRESENTATIVE, BUREAU OF WATER HYGIENE, DHEW REGION I,
JOHN F. KENNEDY FEDERAL BUILDING, BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02203. TELi 617-223-6687
-------
LISTING OP WATER SUPPLIES pRQM THE "
1COOOOOOOOOO
lo Do 0
1301848301,20
190187a00060
13C190900C90
15C196000030
150198800120
13C212800020
150229600030
1SC232400090
150^32^50090
13C735200060
190240800010
150^43050120
150234990030
13C267050080
15C271600060
150274400040
150277800040
150277810040
150277350040
15C280000060
150283000110
19C288400090
150294000110
130299000000
150308090090
150310800100
1903i9800070
19032200S120
190329QOO&40
130327000100
15C3904S0106
150335090090
130344500030
130366000040
150379300040
190373000080
130383000100
15C3864SOC90
130397S00080
190397090080
130397060080
190400*00040
190400900040
190403300000
19040^000040
190411900040
130431200140
150434000090
15C442400030
15C445900040
to Do a
STATE
POPo
580
170
039
125
190
120
200
023
080
090
1200
300
160
088
750
2500
8000
500
1000
470
2400
300
130
290
400
060
120
1390
022
700
064
100
1921
500
129
479
200
1600
900
100
499
700
475
1000
125
100
2000
090
3000
100
POPo
RoFoDo 02
CITY HALL
CXTY HALL
NAME OP SUPPLY
EAST BARRg FIRE DISTRICT NOo
EAST BERKSHIRE WATER COOPo
EA3T BRAINTREE COOPERATIVE
GOULD WATER SUPPLY
EAST CALAIS WATER DEPARTMENT
EAST DORSET WATER DEPTo
EAST HARBWICK FIRE DISTRICT
EAST HAVEN WATER SYSTEM
&OFFEY AND TEACHOUT WATER SYSTEM(AIR FORCE HOUSES ADDITION)
EAST HIGHGATE WATER DEPT0
EAST MlDDLgBUBY PIRE DISTo NOo 1
CRYSTAL SPRINGS WATER C00
EAST RYEQATE AQUEDUCT CORP0
ELMORE COOP WATER SYSTEM
ENOSBURG FALLS WATER DEPTo
ESSEX CENTE3 VsATER DEPTo CXTY HALL
ESSES JUNCTION VILLAGE WATER COoCITY HALL
PINEWOOD MANOR WATER WORKS
FORT ETHAN ALLEN WATER SYSTEM
FAlRFAK VILLAGE WATER SUPPLY
pAlR HAVEN MUNICIPAL WATER SUP0 MUNICIPAL BLDG0o N0 PABK PLACE
!A?RLEE WATER WORKS FIRE DEPTO ~~~
VERMONT WABBLE COo
PRANRL8N WATER DEPTo
SILVAN LIGHT AND POWER CQO
6LOVER VJLLASg WATER DEPTo
6RANB XSLi WATE8 SUPPLY C00
GRANHEVILLE PJRE DISTo 0 4
GReEN°3 TRAILER PARK
GREENSBORO FIRE DISTRICT 01
FLORENCE VALLANCOURT ESTATE
WATER SYSTEM
VILLAGE WATER DEPTo
HINES8UR6 WATER DEPTo
BUNTIN6T6N CENTER WATER C00
HYDE PABK VILLAGE WATER C00
SRASBURG WATER COo
iRlGHTONo TOWN WATER SYSTEM
JEPFER30NVILLE VILLAGE WATER CQo
PADONNA MOUNTAIN CBRPO VILLAGE SYSTEM WATEB SUPPLY
PADONNA MTo eORP0°LOBGE SYSTEM
JERXCHO VILLAGE WATER BEPTo
JgR!CHO°UNDERHlLL WATER DISTRICT(UNDERBILL PLATS)
JOHNSON VILoWATER o LIGHT BEPTo
^ONESVILLE WATER SYSTEM
LAKE SUNSET TRACER COURT
LUDLQW VILLAGE WATER DEPTo
buNENBuRG FIRE DISTRICT NOO i
LYNOoNVlLLE VILLAGE WATER DEPT<
«ONG£ON WATER WORKS
NAME OP SUPPLY
2 LINCOLN SUREST
CITY HALL
FLORENCE WATER SYSTEM
CXTY HALL
WATER SUPPLY
HJSHWAY 14
WATER 5YSTEH
CXTY HALL
CXTY HALL
son 39
(X3LAN0 POND SUPPLY)
EAST
gAST @gRKSHIRlo VEBMON?
BANBOLPHo VERMONT
EAST SURKEo VERMONT
EAST CALASSo VERMONT
IA3T DORSETo VERMONT
EAST HARDWXCKo VERMONT
EAST HAVENo VERMONT
EAST HAVENo VERMONT
EAST HXGHGATEo VERMONT
EAST MIDDLlBURYo VERMONT
EAST MONTPELlERo VERMONT
EAST RYEQATE; VERMONT
LAKE ELMOREo VERMONT
ENOSauRG FALLSo VERMONT
ESSIR CENTERo VERMOwy
ES3ER JUNCTIONo VERMONT
ES3EK JUNCTJONo VERMONT
ESSER JUNCTXONo VERMONT
FAXRFA»o VERMONT
PAIR HAVENo VERMONT
CXTY HALL
(MECHAWXC3VXLLE)
DRAWo S
CITY HALL
MALLETS BAY
VERMONT
PRANKUNo VERMONT
gXLMANo V2RH0NT
6L6VEHO VERMONT
@3ANP KSLSo VERMONT
6BANXTBVILLE; VERMfNT
SHARONo VlRMONT
QBggNSBOROo VERMONT
GREiNSQQRO 0EN00 VERMONT
GUXLBHALLo VERMONT
HAt^BtixCRo VERMONT
HXNISQURgoVERMONT
HUNTIW0T0N CENTIBo VERMONT
HYDI PARKo VERMONT
XRA3QUR@o VERM3NT
X9UND PONDo VERMONT
jEPFERSONVILLEo VERMONT
JIPPERSQNVXLLEo VlRMONT
jEFPERSONVXLLEo VERMONT
jERXCHBo VERMONT
UNBBBHBLLo VERMONT
JOHNSON „ VERMONT
JONESvXLLEo VERMONT
RICHMONDo VERMONT
LUDLOWo VERMONT
LUNENQURgg VERMONT
LYNDONVILLEo VERMONT
WXNOOS«Io VERMONT
09649
09447
09060
09932
09630
09293
09836
09937
09937
09449
09740
09691
09042
09697
09490
09431
09492
09492
09492
03494
09743
09047
09763
09437
09904
09939
09493
03S94
09069
09941
09842
09909
09943
09461
09601
03639
09849
09946
09464
09464
09464
03463
09489
09&96
09' 66
09477
09149
03906
09831
09404
-------
LISTINO OF WATER SUPPLIES PROM THE "CwSS"
1CCOOOOOOOOO
I. D. *
150448000020
190441090020
190499200120
150459*00110
19C499490110
190462000010
190464100120
190464110120
190464190120
190470400040
19047049U040
19047046(1040
190470470040
190476090060
19C478I00060
190481*00120
190481*90120
190491000080
190492800080
190904)00090
190912400100
19C919a00100
19C518000020
190932000120
190937650140
190943100080
190946000120
190991600020
190960000090
190960010090
190962*00100
190962900130
19C962910136
150568400140
190571200100
190576850030
1905&2400030
190590800110
190593600110
190596400120
19C610400110
190613300020
190613550020
150616000110
190618800140
190618990120
190621690130
15C624450UO
19C627200090
190630000090
1. D. *
5TATI
POP.
2500
499
375
026
078
9500
025
025
025
2000
200
200
490
100
090
9500
150
125
2500
400
5019
240
3300
4500
250
100
075
100
100
025
975
039
100
800
1800
129
150
100
1400
840
1750
600
015
2200
450
060
900
300
2200
140
POP*
CITY HALL
MENDON MATER SUPPLY
MUNICIPAL BLOG.
CITY HALL
CITY HALL
CITY HALL
CITY HALL
CITY HALL
CITY HALL
NAME OF SUPPLY
MANCHESTER MATER COMPANY
DIG BROMLEY SKI AREA MATER SUP.
MARSHFIELD VILLAGE MATER DEPT.
MENDON WATER SOCIETY
EAST RIDGE ACRES WATER SUPPLY
MIDDLEBURY WATER DEPT.
CHURCH STREET WATER SUPPLY
MIDDLESEX, NON PROFIT WATER SYST
MESTQVER WATER SUPPLY
MILTON HATER SYSTEM
MILTQN MEADOW MATER SUPPLY
VHE^KERBERRY PARK TRAILER PARK
BIRCHWOOD MANOR TRAILER PARK
ST. ONGE WATER SYSTEM
MONTGOMERY CENTER WATER COMPANY CITY HALL
"ONTpELlER WATER WORKS
,'OwNE HILL WATER CO.* INC.
MORRISTOWN CORNERS WATER SUPPLY
MORRISVILLE LIGHT * WATER co.
NEWBURY VILLAGE LIGHTING DIST,
BEWPORT WATER OEPT.
CEwPORT CENTER WATER DEPT.
NORTH BENNINGTON WATER DEPT.
NORTHFIELD WATER DEPT.
N. HARTLAND WATER SYSTEMS* INC.
N. HYDE PARK FIRE DISTRICT NO. i
N. MONTPELIER MATER SUPPLY
POwNAL TANNING COMPANY
UNION MATER CO. INC.
N. THETFORD VILLAGE MATER co.
NORTH TROY VILLAGE MATER CO.
WORTH WESTMINSTER AQUEDUCT ASSN.70 SAXON RIVER ROAD
NORTH MEST^INSTER MATER COOP.INC
•OR*ICM MATER SUPPLY CO. INC.
ORLEANS MUNICIPAL MATER SUPPLY MEMORIAL SQUARE
PASSUMPSIC AQUEDUCT SYSTEM
PEACHAM FIRE DISTRICT NO. 1
MT. MICOX MATER ASSN.
PITTSFORD AQUEDUCT co.
PLAINFIELD VILLAGE MATER COMPANYCITY HALL
POULTNCY VILLAGE WATER COMPANY CITY HALL
POWNAL WATER COMPANY
LAMPMAN WATER SYSTEM
PROCTOR* TOWN. MATER DEPT.
PROCTORSVILLE MATER SYSTEM
PUTNAMVILLE MATER CO-OP. INC.
WINDHAM COLLEGE WATER SUPPLY
HARTFORD TOWN WATER DEPT.
RANDOLPH WATER DEPT.
RANDOLPH CENTER FIRE DISTRICT
NAME OF SUPPLY
CITY HALL
BOX 143
POWNAL CENTER
CITY HALL
1TOMN OF CAVENDISH)
OUECHEE MATER SUPPLY
MANCHESTER CENTER* VT. 09195
MANCHESTER* VERMONT 0529*
MARSHFIELD, VERMONT 09*98
RUTLAND. VERMONT 09701
RUTLAND, VERMONT 09701
MIDDLEBURY. VERMONT 05753
MIDDLESEX* VERMONT 09*99
MIDDLESEX, VERMONT 09*99
MIDDLESEX* VERMONT 09*99
MILTON* VERMONT 094*8
MILTONi VERMONT 094*8
MILTON* VERMONT 094*8
MILTON, VERMONT 094*8
MONTGOMERY, VERMONT 09470
MONTGOMERY, VERMONT 09471
MONTPELIER, VERMONT 09*01
MONTPELIER, VERMONT 09*02
MORRISTOWN CORNERS, VERMONT09**!
MORRISVILLE* VERMONT 09**i
NEWBURY* VERMONT 05051
NEWPORT, VERMONT 05855
NEWPORT CENTER* VT. 09897
NORTH BENNINGTON, VT. 09257
NORTHFIELD. VERMONT 05*63
NORTH HARTLAND* VERMONT 05092
NORTH HYDE PARK* VERMONT 09669
NORTH MONTPELIER, VERMONT 096**
NORTH PCMNAL. VERMONT 092*0
NORTH THETFORD, VERMONT 09054
NORTH THETFORD* VERMONT 05054
NORTH TROY, VERMONT 09899
BELLOW FALLS; VERMONT 09101
NORTH WESTMINSTER, VERMONT 09ioi
NORWICH. VERMONT 09055
ORLEANS. VERMONT 058*0
PASSUMPSIC, VERMONT 098*1
PEACHAM, VERMONT 398*2
PITTSFIELD, VERMONT 097*2
PITTSFORD, VERMONT 097*3
PLAINFIELD, VERMONT 05*67
POULTNEY. VERMONT 057*4
POWNALt VERMONT 052*1
POWNAL* VERMONT 092*1
PROCTOR. VERMONT 39769
PROCTORSVILLE* VT. 05153
PUTNAMVILLE. VERMONT 05*02
PUTNEY* VERMONT 0934*
QUECHEE, VERMONT 09059
RANDOLPH. VERMONT 090*0
RANDOLPH CENTER, VERMONT 090*1
oo
00
-------
LISTING OF WAYIR SUPPLIES PROM THE "CwSS"
100000000000
lo Do 0
190630098090
190635600020
15C638400060
150641200040
15C649S90140
150660800110
150660850UO
130666^00060
130669300040
190672000030
19C674gS003o
150683310130
1506833201,30
150691000040
150691V30040
150694400060
150700030060
190708430120
130708000040
130714000070
190714100070
150714808070
1S0733S00140
1S0733S50140
130736400030
110742109100
130744800UO
130736000140
150733800010
150764909000
190764310000
190770000130
190772800030
15C775008060
130781200090
150790000010
130806400010
1308288001*0
150830000040
130834430120
130837300090
130840000120
190842830120
130849(500080
130848400126
130848490120
19085400QOQO
150865300030
190865250030
130865380030
lo Do 0
STATI
POPo
630
500
1800
800
430
19300
040
9000
200
7000
400
120
040
3200
040
100
300
100
300
080
180
100
637
073
030
330
073
8000
200
800
200
4000
064
2500
120
2000
2000
800
050
499
170
1300
300
100
460
063
430
075
075
040
POPo
NAME OF SUPPLY
VERMONT TECHNICAL COLLEGE WATER SUPPLY
READ3BORO VILLAGE WATER SUPPLY
RICHPORD VILLAGE WATER SUPPLY
RICHMOND VILLA6E WATER DEPTo
ROCHESTER WATER SUPPLY
RUTLAND PUBLIC WATER WORKS CITY HALL
PICO VILLA WATER SUPPLY C00
STO ALBANS W^TER DEPTO 100 MAIN STO
8AiNY GEORGE VILLA WAYER SUPPLY (MAxL BURLSR6YON)
STo JOHNSBURY WATER DEPTo
BQNGgONoLEOo WATER SYSTEM
SA»TON3 RIVER ° BARNES SYSTEM WATER SUPPLY
SAsTONS RIVER ° CLARK SYSTEM WATER SUPPLY
WAYER DEPARYMENY
WOOD SHORE WATER SUPPLY
SHELDON WATER COOPERATIVE INCo
SHELDON SPRINGS WATIR SYSTEM
HILL WATEB COo INCo
BURLINSY8N ?IRE BI3Y0 1
300 HERO°KEELE^ BAY WYRo SYSYEM PLANY NOo J
SOUTH HSBO FXSE DISTRICT 01
^OUTH HIBO FIRE DISTRICT NOo
§
30UTH B6YALTON PIRE DI9TRKT 01
WATEB SUPPLY
SOUTH BOYALT8W°SATON SYSTEM
OOUTH BYQGATE C08P0 SYSTEM
DOUTH TRQY WATER SY3TIM
SOUTH WALLIN6PQRD WATEK CO
SPBINGPIELD WATER DEPT0
STARKSBORO A8UEDUCT COMPANY
STOWg VILLAGE WATER * UTILo
STOfcgoLOWER 3TOWE WATER WORKS
STRATTON CORPO DEVELOPMENT WATERSUPPLY
MUNICIPAL ^ATER SUPPLY
VILLAGE WATER COMPANY
THETPORD WATER COnOPo INCo
TRi°?OWN WATER DISTRICT N00i
VER6ENN63 WATER COMPANY
WALLINGFORD VILLAGE WATER C00
WARDoS TRAILER PARK
SUG^BBUSH SKI flREA WATER SUPPLY
tfUNTjNGTON WATER SUPPLYlWASHlNG
WATERSURY MUNICIPAL WATER DIPT0
WATERBURY CENTER WATER WORKS
OATESVILLE VILLAGE WATER COOP
WE0STE8V8LLE FIRE DISTo N00 3
WELLS LAMSON 6UARRY WATER CQoINCBOX 133
WELLS RIVER VILLAGE WATER C00 CITY HALL
P-A|RiROTHER WATER SYSTEM
WAgNER'S WATER SUPPLY
WEST BURKE bATER COo
NAME OF SUPPLY
MALL
TOWN OFFICEo 96 MAIN §TC
CITY HALL
CITY HALL
ADDjSONo BRIDPORTo AND SHOREHAM
CXTV HALL
CITV HALL
01
SOUTH CW&N ST0
09*01
0906S
OSi94
RAN00LPH CENTER o VERMONT ososi
OS390
Vfo 03*76
BICHMONDo VERMONT 03477
ROCHlSTEBo VERMONT 03767
RUTLANDo VERMONT 09701
BUYLANDo VERMONT 09701
3T0 A'LBANSo V2RMONY
SAxwY @EQR@IE; VESMONY
3To JOHNSBURYo VERMONY
SYodOHNSQUgY CENYlBo VY
SANTQNS SlVERo VERMONY
3ARYQN3 SEVlBo VERMQNY
SHELBURNEo
SHELBURNEo
SHELBONo
3HELB6N
90U7M BflgBEo
38UTH BUBLXNSYQNo VYo
38U?H HBROj VY0
SOUTH HEBQo VIRM0N?
30UYH HEBOo VERMONT
S0UYH ROVALYONo VlBMONY
90UYH BevALYQNo VlBMONY
3QUYH BveSAYEo VERMONY
3QUYH YRQYo V2BMONY
SOUTH WALLlNSPORBo VE8MONY 09771
VEBMONY 03196
03487
09672
09672
VERMQNY
09483
09483
094Q9
09670
09202
09486
09486
09068
09068
09069
09868
9TOWio VEBM0NY
SYOWEo VE8MONY
STBATTON MQUNTAINo VERMONT 09199
SUTTONo VERMONT
SWANTONo VERMONT
THETPORDo VERMONT
ADDS SONo VEBMONT
VlR6ENNE3o VYo
VERMONY
09867
09488
09074
09491
09491
09773
BOLTONo VUBMONT JUATER0U3Y)09676
WARRENo VERMONT 09674
WA3NIN6TON0 VERMONT 09679
o VERMONT 09676
CENYEHo VgHMONY 09&76
WAYERVILLIo VERMONY 09^92
WEBSYERVlLLEp VERMOwY 0347S
WIBSYgRVILLES VY0 09678
WELLS RIVERo VERMONY 09081
WESY BURKIo VIRMONY 09871
WE3Y iURKEo VERMONY 09871
WEST BURKSo VERMON? 09871
-------
LISTIN6 Of MATER SUPPLIES FROM THE
100000000000
I. D. *
15088*800100
150898100130
15C9H400110
U0929700030
H0939J90140
1509*6*00090
15C94649i090
150992000040
HC992030040
150992040040
150992090040
15C952660040
150995000130
150997*00140
190997T00040
190997T90040
1509*6000140
150968100120
STATI
POP.
100
190
1990
060
4700
410
290
139
400
200
200
120
690
3900
7900
200
1519
180
CITY HALL
BOX 97
CITY HALL
(MAIL LYNOONVILLE)
SYSTEM
NAME OF SUPPLY
WESTFIELD VILLAGE WATER SYSTEM
WESTMINSTER AQUEDUCT SOCIETY
NEST RUTLAND MATER COMPANY
NHEELOCK WATER SUPPLY
HARTFORD* TOWN WATER DEPT.
GILBERT 6 UPPER ROBINSON WATER
LOWER ROBINSON MATER SYSTEM
ONEIDA WATER CORP.
LAMPLITER ACRE'S MATER SUPPLY
NEADOWBROOK WATER SUPPLY
CAK HILL MOBILE HO*E WATER SUP.
WILLISTON HILLS WATER CO.
WILMINGTON *ATER DISTRICT
WINDSOR VILLAGE WATER CO. CITY HALL
WINOOS*! MATER DEPT.
SPAULDING'S WEST SHCRE ASSOC.INCWATER SUPPLY* ROUTE
WOODSTOCK AQUEDUCT CO.
MAXHAM WATER SYSTEM HIGHWAY 12
WESTFlELD. VERMONT 05874
WESTMINSTER. VERMONT 09151
NEST RUTLAND; VERMONT 05777
MHEELQCK. VERMONT 05891
WHITE RIVER JUNCTION* VT. 95001
WILLIAMSTOWN, VERMONT 05*79
WILLIAMSTOWN, VERMONT 05*79
WILLISTON, VERMONT 05495
MILLISTON, VERMONT 05495
MILLISTON* VERMONT 05495
MILLISTON* VERMONT 05495
MILLISTON* VERMONT 05495
MILMIN6TON, VERMONT 053*9
WINDSOR. VERMONT 05089
MINCOS*I. VERMONT 05404
WINOOSKI. VERMONT 05404
WOODSTOCK. VERMONT 05091
MORRCESTER* VERMONT 05*82
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT THE REGIONAL REPRESENTATIVE, BUREAU OF WATER HYGIENE,
DHEW REGION I, JOHN F. KENNEDY FEDERAL BLDG., BOSTON, MASS. 02203. TELi 6YK-223-6687.
I
o
-------
LISTING OF WATER SUPPLIES FROM THE °CwSSB
200000000000
Jo Do 0
235006700300
239017050920
239017300600
235017300600
235031950600
235054U00300
235058900600
235058930600
239039070600
239099080600
233067000300
239073100440
239077400440
235079050520
235091?00520
239093000600
235093950530
239102000600
233111996520
239113090440
239119100446
239115130440
299113190440
239113300600
239li989044o
233121300300
239136050320
239140100600
233148000320
235136100300
239158350440
235184100600
235188550520
235194030600
239194350600
233201300600
239202000600
233210^00520
233224?50S20
239230600520
239239300530
239243800300
239247000330
239249950520
239267000600
239273900320
233277000300
235277100920
235284500520
235284V90520
I o Do 0
2FOR FURTHER
DHEW REGION
5MSA
POPo
13100
3000
320
500
1370
3800
6000
373
063
600
32000
300
033
150
24000
7800
1600
2168
180
223
300
300
100
1600
192
10342
9100
800
1000
32000
090
2200
820
183
16500
200
8000
4000
14000
400
3830
49400
1400
1000
3200
1200
8000
3000
2500
200
POPo
INFORMA
II, FEDI
NEW YORKg MEW YORK
NAME OP SUPPLY
__ WATER DISTRICT
AMAGANSETT WATER COMPANY
AM4WALK HEIGHTS WATER DISTO
AMAWALK°SHENOROCK WATER DISTo
WINDMILL FARM W0 k»KSo CORP0
BAyVlLLE VILLAGE WATER DgPTo
5EDFQRD TOWN WATER DISTRICTS
iEDPORD FARMS WATER COMPANY
ROOSEVELT DRIVE WATER ASSOCo
WE3TPSELD STATE FARM
8ETHPAGE WATER DISTRICT
3T0 DOMINtOS HOME
SLUE BIRD (PIDGEON) TRAILER PARKTHIEL MTo
BLUE POINT COMMUNITY ASSOC
|RENTWOOD WATER DISTRICT
BR?ARCLIPF MANOR viLo WATER DEPT
BRIDGEHAMPTON WATER COMPANY
BUCHANAN VILLAGE WATER SUPPLY
BAITING HOLLOW LODGE
CAMP ADDISONE BQYCE
CAMP BULLOWA WATER SUPPLY
CAMP LOW ACRES WATER SUPPLY
CAMP RAMAQUOIS WATER SUPPLY
CAMP SMITH o NATIONAL 6UARD
CAMP WXLLIAM9
CARLE PLACE WATIB DISTRICT
EENTRAL ISLSP STATE HOSPITAL
NEW CASTLE WATER COo
feHgRRY GROVE WATER DISTRICT
CITIZENS WATER C00 OF NEWTOWN
CLARK TRAILED PAUK
CONTINENTAL VILLAGE WATER DISTo
EASTERN SUFFOLK WATER C00
CORTLAND TOWN WATER DISTo 1
CORTLANDT TOWN WATER DISTRICTS
CROTON FALLS WATER DISTRICT
CROTON=ON=HUDSON CITY WATER WKS0C8TY HALL
DAVIS PARK WATER WORKS COoo I^Co(RURAL
0I» HILLS WATIR DISTRICT TOWN HALL
DUNEWOOD WATER
STBEET
(TOWN OF SOMERSo YORKTQwN)
N00 1 o 3HENOROCK SUPPLY
Po00 BOX 282 (ARWONK)
98 BEDFORD R00
803LYN HEIGHTSo NfW YORK
AMAQANSETTo NEW YORK
AMAWALKo NEW YORK
SHENORQCKo NEW ""
PORTCHESTERo NEW YORK
BAYVXLLEo NEW YOBK
KATONAHo NEW YORK
NEW YORK
247 HARRIS ROAD
IVY ROAD
BLUE POINT WATER SUPPLY
91 THIRD AVEo
STREET
173 Wo CLARK3TOWN RDo
370 MINEOLA AVBC
SYSTEM
BRo PATCW06UE P000)
8IDPQ90 HSLLSo Nn YORK
BEDP0SD HILLSo NEW YORK
BETHPAGEoLONG ISLANDoNoYc
BLAUVENTo NEW YORK
POMONAo NEW YORK
BLUE POlNTo NEW YORK
BRENTwOODo NgW YORK
BRIARCLIFF MANORo NDY0
BRlDGEHAMPTONo NEW YORK
BUCHANANo NEW YORK
CALVERTONo NEW YORK
TOMKJNS COVE? NEW YORK
STONEV POlNTo NEW YORK
SPRING VALLEYo N0Y0
POMONAo NIW YORK
PEEKSKlLLo NEW YORK
SUPPERNo NEW Y0RK
(No HEMPSTEAD) CARLE PLACEo NEW YORK
CENT8AL ISLIPo NEW YORK
CHAPPAQUAo NEW YORK
CHERRY GROVE0 NEW YORK
8REAT NECKo NEW YORK
POMONAo NEW YORK
PIEKSKlLLo NgW YORK
NEW YORK
PIEKSKlLLo NEW YORK
CQRTLANDT (T)o NEW YORK
SALgMPURDY STATIONo NEW YORK
CROTONo NEW YORK
DAVgS PARKo NIW YORK
HUNTlNQTONo NEW YORK
PoOo)
(RURAL BRANCH OF SAVVJLLE
936 MlBDLENgCK RQo
MT0 IVV
(TOWN OF PHBLLXPSTOWN) RTO 3
4910 SUNRISE HWYo (CORAM SUPPLY)PATCHOGUEo
6 PUTNAM PARK ROAD
(SALEM CENTER), TOWN OF N
11377
11930
10301
10987
10373
11709
10936
10906
10907
10307
11714
10913
10970
11713
11717
10310
11932
10311
11933
10986
10980
10977
10970
10366
10901
11914
11722
10914
11782
U02)
10970
10366
11772
10366
10920
10378
10320
11723
11743
EAST FARMINGDALE WATER DISTRICT 1919 R7o U9
EAST MEADOW WATER DISTRICT 1993 PROSPECT
DUNEWOOOo FIRE ISooNEW YORKH734
AVEo (HEMPSTEAD)
EAST PATCHCSUE WATER SUPPLY
EAST QUOQUP WATER SUPPLY
NEW YORK
NEW YORK
SWAN LAKE WATER COo
COMMUNITY WATER CORPO
MUNICIPAL WATER
HARBOR HATER DISTRICT PXHE J3LAND
CITY WATER WORKS CETY HALL
STATE UNlVo AGRo 6 TECHo INSTo
FIR? ISLAND PINES WATER DISTRICTOBo SAYVILLE P000>
DUNE REALTY CORPo (FIRE ISLAND SUMMER CLUB*
NAME OF SUPPLY
CONTACT THE REGIONAL REPRESENTATIVE, BUREAU OF WATER
FEDERAL BLDG. , 26 FEDERAL PLAZA, NEW YORK, N.Y. 10007. TEL:
FARMlNGDALEo
EAST MEADOWo
EAST QUOGUEo NEW YORK
ILMSFQRDo NEW YORK
PAIR HARBORo NEW YORK
PAPJMINGOALEo NEW YQBK
PARMINGDALEo NEW YORK
FIRI ISLAND P.INESo N
FIRE ISLANDoOCEAN
11735
11594
U772
11942
oNY
11735
11739
11782
11770
HYGIENE,
212-264-2523.
-------
LISTINC Of MATCH SUPPLIES FROM THE "CwSS"
200000000000
I. D. *
239289900920
239300100300
235303000300
233309930300
2333101U0300
2353109*0**0
239310990**o
235311600440
239321000300
235321030300
235328050600
235328100600
235336900600
235339100520
235339900520
235356*00520
235363810600
235368920*40
233372900300
235378000300
2353820004*0
235*05530520
235*0596052o
235*13900600
235*17100*10
239*22*00300
235*39090520
235*41000520
235**9020520
235449*50520
235455050520
235458000600
235466300300
235468700300
235*81100300
235*82000300
235*83100300
235501600300
2355U750300
235515050520
235516900440
235520300520
235532850520
235533600300
235535500300
2355356C0300
2355*2100520
2355*5050600
235553200600
2355544U0440
I. D. *
9MSA
POP.
300
20000
41000
24000
24000
600
025
040
27000
500
340
600
45000
29000
5700
4000
6000
200
40000
59800
1000
1120
1200
5800
650000
60000
9*25
500
150
2100
600
6860
46400
6900
7000
90000
259000
42700
50000
400
085
2540
500
240
22052
16000
3500
3000
650
550
POP.
— NEW YORK* NEN YORK
NAME OF SUPPLY
SOUTH HOLD TOMN
- - *or~~
893 SCHROETER AVE.
FISHERS ISLAND WATER COMPANY
FRANKLIN SQUARE WATER DISTRICT
FREEPORT VILLAGE MATER DEPT.
GARDEN CITY PARK MATER DISTRICT 333 MARCUS AVE.
SADDEN CITY MUNICIPAL WTR. WORKS351 STEWART AVENUE
GARNERVILLE MOLDING CORP. RAILROAD AVE*
KELLER'S APARTMENTS
«EXLER BUNGALOWS, ROCKLAND MOTEL
GLEN COVE WATER DEPT.
GLEN COVE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
LAKE KATONAVJ CLUB
GOLDENS BRIDGE COMMUNITY A5SOC. WATER SUPPLY* BOX 216
6REENBURGH MUNICIPAL WATER WORKS(UNINCORPORATED AREA)
GREENLAWN WATER DISTRICT
GREENPORT VILLAGE WATER DEPT. 18 SOUTH ST.
HAMPTON BAYS MATER DISTRICT
HARRISON TOWN WATER DIST. NO. i 22« HARRISON AVE.
•IRCHWOOD BUNGALOM COLONY
HEMPSTEAD MUNICIPAL WATER SUPPLY320 CLINTON STREET
HICKSVILLE W*TER DISTRICT "
HILLBURN WATER SUPPLY
BEVON WATER CORP.
89 BETHPAGE RD.
37 9TH STREET
BOX 512
FISHERS ISLAND* NEW YORK 06390
FRANKLIN SQUARE* L.I.. N.Y.11010
FREEPORT. NEW YORK
GARDEN CITY PARK, N.Y.
GARDEN CITY. NEW YORK
GARNERVILLE. NEW YORK
6ARNERVILLE* NEW YORK
GARNERVILLE. NEW YORK
GLEN COVE* NEW YORK
GLEN COVE* NEW YORK
GOLDENS BRIDGE* NEW YORK
GOLDENS BRIDGE, NEW YORK
SCARDALE. NEW YORK
GREENLAWN, NEW YORK
GREENPORT, N.Y.
HAMPTON BAYS. NEW YORK
HARRISON. N. Y.
HAVERSTRAW* NEW YORK
HEMPSTEAD. L.I.. NEW YORK
HICKSVILLE* NEW YORK
MOQDBURY TRIANGLE INC.
IRVINGTON WATER WORKS
JAMAICA WATER SUPPLY COMPANY
JERICHO WATER DISTRICT
MNGS PARK STATE HOSPITAL
KISMET WATER CORP.
CEDAR GROVE CIVIC ASSOC.
HARSNjP POND MATER CO.
RONKONKAMA WATER CO.* INC.
LARCHMONT VILLAGE WATER DEPT.
LEvlTTOfcN WATER DISTRICT
LIDO-POINT LOOKOUT k-ATER DlST.
LOCUST VALLEY WATER OlST.
fcONG BEACH CITY WATER DEPT.
LONG ISLAND WATER CORPORATION
•ANHASSET.LAKEVILLE WATER DIST.
fAgSAPECUA W»TER DISTRICT
CAPTAIN KTDD MATER co.
MAZZA AND LEONE TRAILER PARK
SUFFOLK STATE SCHOOL WATER SPL.
GRQVELAND PARK ASSOC.
"ILL NECK ESTATES WATER CO.
"INEOLA VILLAGE WATER DEPT.
MITCHELL FIELD WATER SUPPLY
"ONTAUK WATER SUPPLY
MONTROSE IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
MOUNTAIN LAKES CAMP WATER SUPPLY
MT. IVY TRAILER PARK A.
NAME OF SUPPLY
HILLBURN. NEW YORK
HUNTINGTON. L.l
I.*NEW YORK
(COLD SPRING HILLS WATER SUPPLY.HUNTINGTON, NEW YORK
IRVINGTON* NEW YORK
NASSAU SUPPLY* 1*1-20 89TH AVE. JAMICA* NEW YORK
123 CONVENT RD.
(RURAL BR. OF BAYSHORE P.O.)
11920
110*0
11930
10923
10923
10923
119*2
119*2
10926
10926
10983
11740
119**
119*6
10928
1092T
11990
11801
10931
117*3
117*3
10933
11*31
11791
1779*
11706
SYOSSET, NEW YORK
KINGS PARK, L.I** NEW YORK
KISMET* NEW YORK
LAKE GROVE* NEW YORK (L.I.111739
LAKE GROVE WATER SUP.«260 N.BLVDGREAT NECK, L.I.* NEW YORK 11021
ST. JOSEPH 4VE. LAKE RONKQNKoMA, L.I.. N.Y.11779
LARCHMONT* NEW YORK
HEMPSTEAD(T) LEVITTOWN. NEW YORK
POINT LOOKOUT* NEW YORK
LOCUST VALLEY* NEW YORK
CITY HALL LONG BEACH* NEW YORK
733 SUNRISE HIGHWAY LYNBROOK* NEW YORK
176 E. SHORE RD. MANHASSET* L.I.* NEw YORK
8* GRAND AVE. MASSAPEOUA, NEW YORK
MATTITUCK WATER SUPPLY, BOX A^IWANTAGH, NEW YORK
(POMONA POST OFFICE)
BOX 788
HARRISON AVE.
ELM STREET
200 COUNTY SEAT RD.
PONTAUK HIGHWAY
SECTION - SOUTH OF RT. 202
MT. IVY. NEW YORK
MELVILLE* NEW YORK
MILLER PLACE; L.I*. N.Y.
MILL NECK, NEW YORK
MINEOLA VILLAGE* L.I.. N.Y,
MINEOLA. NEW YORK
MONTAuK, NEW YORK
MONTROSE. NEW YORK
NORTH SALEM, NEW YORK
MT. IVY. POMQNA, N.Y.
10938
11796
11969
11960
11961
11363
11030
11738
11793
10970
117*6
1176*
11763
11901
11501
1199*
109*8
10360
10970
VO
ro
-------
LISTING OF WATER SUPPLIES FROM THE "CwSS"
200000000000
lo D0 6
239554300600
239556660600
235557030520
235558500600
235561600440
235570390600
233570320440
233570940440
23357@000600
235578390600
235582300310
233382550*10
233582750300
235591710600
233601060600
2356012^0600
233602200600
239606900440
239609V00920
23961C000920
233613730300
239&20350440
233620600440
239624500600
213632350300
233632100300
239632190300
233638980440
233644000600
235644100600
239660400300
23366C700300
239662900600
239662300600
233663700600
233663950920
235670900300
233674100520
233678000300
239709550520
233709960920
259709S70520
2^3709300520
233709900520
235713350440
233716000300
2?37l6S20920
235716950520
235716600526
235716650520
lo Do 0
SMSA
POPo
7000
5000
080
78000
600
18000
125
160
139000
33000
8100000
123000
165000
2000
185
108
8818
13000
4000
12000
2500
048
9300
25900
200
9023
070
290
20000
2000
40000
1500
7000
188
200
900
43300
180
32000
490
140
320
7213
1200
100
27000
073
1400
2800
360
POPo
NEW YORKo NEW YORK
NAME OF SUPPLY
104 Eo MAIN STREET
NEW YORK 10991
NYACKo NEW YORK 10960
OCEAN BAY PARKo FoTSoo N0Y011779
0CEAN BEACHo NEW YQBK 11770
OLD WeSTBURVo Loloo NoYo 11368
ORAN@gBuR€o NEW YORK 10962
ORANggBUBGo NEW YORK 10962
OSSgNlN60 NEW YORK 10362
6YS7EB iAV0 Loloo NEW YORK 11771
6YSTEB BAYo NEW YORK 11771
COVE NECKo NEW YORK 11771
POMONAo NEW YORK 10970
PEEKSKlLLo NEW YORK 10966
PlLHAMo NEW YORK 10803
PUlNviEWo NEW YORK 11Q03
PLANDQMEo MANHASSETo N0Y0 UOSO
PLEA3ANTV?LLEo NEW YORK 10370
PLEASANTVXLLEo NEW YORK 10970
pocAfmee HILLSO NEW YORK 10991
poQ)PO!N? O'WOQDSo NEW YORK 11779
PORT CHESTERo NoYo 10373
PORT JEFPERSONo NEW YORK 11777
PORT WASHINGTONo L0I0o N0Y0H030
BlVlRHEABo NEW YORK 11901
HOLLOW RIVERHEAOo NEW YORK 11901
BIVlRHEAOo Lo!oo Ngw YORK 11901
RIVlRHEADo NEW YORK 11901
RIVERHEABo NEW YORK ll'.'Ol
VALLiY COTTAQgo NEW YORK 10989
ROCKVlLLg CgNTERo NgW YORK 11370
ROCKY POlNTo NEW YORK 1177Q
ROCKY POlNTo NEW YORK 117?8
ROCKY POINTo NEW YORK 11778
ROCKY PQINTo L0I0o N0Y0 1177S
-------
LISTING OP WATER SUPPLIES FROM THE "CwSS*
200000000000
I* 0. *
239717150920
239718990920
2*9719700300
23972^600300
235733*00300
239736390920
2357*1550520
2357*4100300
235792900600
235760100300
239761110920
235761950520
235761600520
235768*00920
239768*00920
235772900920
239773090920
2)9781990440
239781*00440
23578*300920
219789590920
23579*800300
239796700920
239802100600
239809300440
239811080440
239811100440
239824100920
23982*290920
235825100440
235829900440
235829550440
235829690520
235829660520
235829670920
299829680520
239829690520
239829700520
239829110920
235829*20920
239829*30920
235829f*05JO
239829*90920
239820*60920
239832S90600
235839000600
235842990440
239844790600
23585*150600
235862400300
I. D. *
SMS A
POP.
159
100
060
23000
400
6200
1000
3500
22000
14000
1500
2100
3200
150
500
600
2600
3000
115
35000
125
49000
90000
300
250
100
170000
206
4000
200
7000
050
34500
124000
144000
8660
47900
46300
81900
99400
3170
53600
7600
8630
190
12000
4600
9000
400
25000
POP.
— NEW YORKi NEW YORK
NAME OF SUPPLY
ROLL
OAK L
25
. IN MOBILE HOME RT.
OAK WOOD DEVELOPMENT WATER SYST.
ROOSEVELT FIELD WATER DISTRICT
ROSLYN WATER DISTRICT
SAGAMORE HILL. NATL. HISTORIC
ST. JAMES WATER DISTRICT
SALTAIRE WATER DISTRICT
SANDS POINT WATER WORKS
SCARDALE MATER SUPPLY
SEA CLIFF WATER CO.
SEAVlEW UTILITIES
SEL00N WATER CO., INC.
SUNHILL WATER CORP.
VEERING HARBOR VILLAGE
SHELTER ISLAND HEIGHTS ASSOC.
SHIRLEY WATER WORKS co.
SHOREWOOD WATER CORP.
POTHAT WATER CO.
SISTER SERVANTS-MARY IMMACULATE
SM|THTOWN WATER DISTRICT
COLONY BEACH FRONT ASSOCIATION
SOUTH FARMINGDALE WATER DISTRICTLANGDON RD.
SOUTH HUNTIN6TON WATER DISTRICT WEST 13TH ST. AND 5TH AVE.
TWIN LAKES WATER WORKS- S. SALEM
ST. AGNES HOME FOR BOYS
SIMON'S BUNGALOWS
SPRING VALLEY HATER Co., INC.
SOUND VIEW ASSOC. INC.
STONY BROOK WATER DISTRICT
MT. VIEW TRAILER PARK
SUFFERN MUNICIPAL WATER WORKS
TA6A3TE SEMINARY
ICWA.AMITYVILLE SERVICE AREA
SCwA.BABYLON SERVICE AREA
•CwA-BAVSHOHE SERVICE AREA
»Cw*-EAST HAMPTON SERVICE AREA
»CWA-HUNTINGTON SERVICE AREA
*CwA-NORTHPORT SERVICE AREA
ICwA.pATCHOGUE SERVICE AREA
CALVERTON. NEW YORK
RONKONKOMA, NEW YORK
WESTBURY, NEW YORK
24 WEST SHORE RO. ROSLYN, NEW YORK
SITE, WATER SUPPLY BOX 304 OYSTER BAY, L.I., N.Y.
ST. JAMES* L.I., NEW YORK
FIRE ISLAND, R.BR. BAYSHORE P.O.SALTAlRE, NEW YORK
CITY HALL PORT WASHINGTON* N.Y.
VILLAGE HALL,WHITE PLNS.POST RD.SCARSOALE* NEW YORK
329 PROSPECT AVE.
393 WILLIS AVE.
SELOON WATER SUPPLY
1534 MAIN ST. (DIST.-SHOREHAM)
SLOATSBURG WATER SUPPLY
61 EAST MAIN ST.
SEA CLIFF* NEW YORK
11*93
UTT*
11590
11576
11771
11710
11706
11090
10583
1157*
SEAVIEW, FIRE is.* NEW YORKimo
ROSLYN HEIGHTS* NEW YORK 11577
SELDON* NEW YORK 11784
SHELTER ISLAND, NEw YORK 11964
SHELTER ISLAND, NEW YORK 11*64
SHIRLEY, NEW YORK 11*67
PORT JEFFERSON, NEW YORK 11777
SLOATSBURG, NEW YORK 10974
SLOATSBURG, NEW YORK 10974
KINGS PARK, NEW YORK 11794
SOUTHAMPTON, L.I., NEW YORK11968
SOUTH FARMlNQDALE* NEW VORK11735
147 NORTH MAIN STREET
MT. GREY RO.
CITY HALL
SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY
SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY
SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY
SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY
SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY
SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY
SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY
fCwA.PQRT JEFFERSON SERVICE AREASUFFOLK CQUNTY MATER AUTHORITY
iCwA.SAG HARBOR SERVICE AREA SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY
KwA-SMITHTOWN-KING PK.SER.AREA SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY
•CWA.SOUTHAMPTON SERVICE AREA SUFFOLK COUNTY MATER AUTHORITY
ICWA.WESTHAMPTON SERVICE AREA SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY
SUNSET RIDGE WATER DISTRICT
TARRYTOWN MUNICIPAL WATER SUPPLY21 wILDEY SI.
LETCHWQRTH VILLAGE
THORNWOOD WATER DISTRICT (TOWN OF MT. PLEASANT)P.O.BOX2o5THORNwOOO* N.Y.
TRUESDALE CORPORATION TRUESDALE LAKE WATER SUPPLY TRUESDALE LAKE, NEW YORK
UNiONDALE WATER DISTRICT UNIONDALE* NEW YORK
NAME OF SUPPLY
HUNTIN8TON STATION, N.Y.
SOUTH SALEM, NEW YORK
SPARKILL, NEW YORK
SPRING VALLEY, NEM YORK
SPRING VALLEY* NEM YORK
STONY BROOK, NEW YORK
STONY BROOK. NEW YORK
STONY POINT, NEW YORK
SUFFERN, NEM YORK
SUFFERN. NEW YORK
OAKOALE. NEW YORK
OAKDALE, NEM YORK
OAKDALE. NEM YORK
OAKOALE. NEM YORK
OAKOALE, NEM YORK
OAKDALE. NEM YORK
OAKOALE, NEM YORK
OAKOALE. NEM YORK
OAKDALE. NEM YORK
OAKDALE. NEM YORK
OAKDALE, NEM YORK
OAKOALE. NEM YORK
TOWN OF NORTH SALEM
TARRYTOwN, NEW YOR*
THIELLS. NEM YORK
N.Y.
11746
105*0
10976
10977
10977
11790
11790
10910
10901
10901
11769
11769
117*9
11749
11769
11769
11769
11769
11769
11769
11769
11769
10560
10591
10984
10594
10590
11553
-------
LISTING OF W*TER SUPPLIES FROM THE "CwSS"
20COOOOOOOOO
I. D. *
SM5A — NEW YORK»
YORK
POP.
235869800600
239870050440
235870100440
2358701504*0
235882550520
235882000520
235882630520
235882650520
235906750520
235908100300
2*5909150030
235909400600
235916800520
2i5919050440
255919200300
235920880520
235934250600
2J5933000600
2*5939200300
235954900600
235956150600
8000
030
120
150
060
240
400
200
14000
24000
60000
3500
300
500
28000
060
500
55000
9000
215000
28000
NA«*E OF SUP°LY
VALHALLA WATER DIST.-MT.PLEASANT271 COLUMBUS AVE.
LOCKE WATER COMPANY
JOY ACRES INC.
TOLSTOY FOUNDATION
HEROO POINT ESTATES
RAMBLEWOOD TRAILER PARK
»OUNO SHORE CLUB, INC.
WADING RIVER WATER WORKS
PILGRIM STATE HOSPITAL
WESTBURY WATER DISTRICT
WESTCHESTER JOINT WATER WORKS
WESTCHESTER COUNTY DEPT. OF
WEST GILGO BEACH ASSOCIATION
N.Y. STATE REHAB. HOSPITAL
HEMP5TEAD GARDEN WATER DISTRICT
WEST ISLAND HOMEOWNER'S ASSOC.
WHITEHALL CORNERS WATER SUPPLY
WHITE PLAINS MUNICIPAL WATER
MILLISTON PARK WATER OEPT.
YONKgRS CITY BUREAU OF WATER
YORKTQWN WATER S 6 D DISTRICT
LAKE ROAD
HEROD LANE
BOX 117* SOUND AVE.
N. WADING RIVER ROAD
BOX 185
160 DREXEL AVE.
(MAMARONECK)
PUBLIC WORKS-(GRASSLANDS)
LINCOLN HALL SCHOOL
SUPPLY. 279 HAMILTON AVE.
494 WILLIS AVE
CITY HALL
VALHALLA. NEW YORK 10595
VALLEY COTTASE, NEW YORK 10989
VALLEY COTTASE. NEW YORK 10989
VALLEY COTTAGE, NEW YORK 10989
WADING RIVER,L.I.,NEW YORK 11792
WADING RIVER, NEW YORK 11792
WADING RIVERA NEW YORK 11792
WADING RIVER. NEW YORK 11792
WEST BRENTWOOD, NEW YORK 11717
WESTBURY. NEW YORK 11590
MAMARONECK, NEW YORK 10543
VALHALLA. NEW YORK 10993
W.GILGO BEACH,FIRE IS.,N.Y.11702
WEST HAVERSTRAW. NEW YORK 10993
WEST HEMPSTEAD, N.Y. 11352
WEST ISLAND. FIR* is.. N.Y.11752
KATONAH. NEW YORK 10936
WHITE PLAINS; NEW YORK 10601
WILLISTON PARK. N.Y. 11996
YONKEH3, NEW YORK 10701
SHRUB OAK* NEW YORK 10988
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT THE REGIONAL REPRESENTATIVE, BUREAU OF WATER HYGIENE,
DHEW REGION II, FEDERAL BLDG., 26 FEDERAL PLAZA, NEW YORK, N.Y. 10007. TEL; 212-264-2523.
to
Ul
-------
355000000000
I. D. «
355003090200
355C62450200
355118150200
355131400200
355140400200
355i45800200
355149450200
355160800200
355184150200
355197450200
355213*00200
355235800200
355415*00200
355348010200
355423010200
355462050200
355475400200
355537M0200
355554500100
355589200200
355640800200
3556558002QO
355687*50200
395688900200
395711*50200
359720600200
395746900200
395751400200
355843040200
355883300200
SMSA
POP*
120
8700
100
130
1750
12100C
2100
3500
036
250
320
1200
1000
1000
100
150
2000
1100
6900
52000
1025
1500
100
090
256
20000
640
2500
045
060
LISTING OF WATER SUPPLIES FROM THE "CUSS"
CHARLESTON* WEST VIRGINIA1
NAME OF SUPPLY
ACME WATER SUPPLY
W. VA. WATER CO. -BELLE DIV.
IMPERIAL CALLIERY CO. BURNWELL WATER SUPPLY
CARBON FUEL COMPANY CARBON WATER SUPPLY
CEDAR GROVE MUNICIPAL WATER co. CITY HALL BLDG.
W. VA. WATER CO. -CHARLESTON DIV.
COMMUNITY WATER CO.
feLENDENIN MUNICIPAL WATER SUPPLYCITY HALL BLDG.
CONSOLIDATED GAS SUPPLY CORP.
RIVERTON COAL CO. -CROWN HILL
CAQBQN FUEL CO. (CECOTA)
EASTBANK WATFR SERVICE
GLASGOW WATER SERVICE
HAN^LEY- C. & 0. RR WATER SYSTEM
BETHLEHEM MINES CORP. (KAYFORO)
WATER SUPPLY CO.
LINCOLN PUBLIC SERVICE DISTRICT
UNITED WATEQ SERVICE CO.
W.VA. WATER CO. -MONTGOMERY DIV.
W.VA. WATER CO.-NITRO DIV.
PINCH PUBLIC SERVICE DISTRICT
PRATT WATER WORKS COMPANY
•MHERST COAL COMPANY (RENSFORD>
CARBON FUEL CO. (REPUBLIC)
RIVERVIEW DEVELOPMENT CO.-RONDA
ST.ALBANS MUNICIPAL WATER SUPPLY
RIVERVIEW OEV. CO. -SHREWSBURY
SISSQNVILLE PUBLIC SERVICE OlST.
VALLEY CAMP COAL CO. OF HARD
WIMIFREDE CCAL CO. (CARBON FUEL)
CITY HALL
LEEWOOD. WEST VIRGINIA 25122
BELLE. WEST VIRGINIA 25019
BURNWELL. WEST VIRGINIA 29034
CARBON* WEST VIRGINIA 25037
CEDAR GROVE. WEST VIRGINIA 23039
CHARLESTON* WEST VIRGINIA 25301
CHELYAN. WEST VIRGINIA 25041
CLENDENIN* WEST VIRGINIA 25045
CORTONt WEST VIRGINIA 25050
CROWN HILL, WEST VIRGINIA 25052
DECQTAi WEST VIRGINIA 25055
EASTBANK. WEST VIRGINIA 25067
GLASGOW* WEST VIRGINIA 25086
HANDLEY. WEST VIRGINIA 25102
KAYFORD. WEST VIRGINIA 25116
LEEWOOO.WEST VIRGINIA 25122
ALUM CREEK, WEST VIRGINIA 25003
MIAMI. WEST VIRGINIA 25134
MONTGOMERY. WEST VIRGINIA 25136
NITRO. WEST VIRGINIA 25143
PINCH* WEST VIRGINIA 2515*
PRATT. WEST VIRGINIA 251*2
RENSFORD. WEST VIRGINIA 25300
REPUBLIC, WEST VIRGINIA 25037
SHARON, WEST VIRGINIA 25182
ST. ALBANS. WEST VIRGINIA 25177
SHREWSBURY, WEST VIRGINIA 25184
SISSONVILLE. WEST VIRGINIA 25320
WARD* WEST VIRGINIA 25207
WINIFREDS. WEST VIRGINIA 25214
I
to
3FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT THE REGIONAL REPRESENTATIVE, BUREAU OF WATER HYGIENE,
DHEW REGION III, 220 SEVENTH STREET, NE, CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA 22901. TEL: 703-296-1416.
-------
LISTING OF WATER SUPPLIES FROM THE "CwSS"
4450000COOOO
I. D. *
445059010080
445059V20080
445059030080
445C59040080
445148000100
445140010100
445148070100
445259010100
445259020100
445259030100
445275000080
445298000100
445303000100
445344050080
445422000100
445442650100
445586000080
445606000100
445606050100
445704010080
445774000080
4«5844000100
5M5A — CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA
POP.
260
140
200
036
220000
085
225
150
500
100
141
2000
025
7200
4300
150
4200
7500
080
500
1600
1692
NAME OF SUPPLY
BERKELEY COUNTRY CLUB SUBDIV. MATER SUPPLY? RT.2, BOX 26A
CAPOMI VILLAGE SUBDIVISION COASTAL MATER CO.
COLLEGE PARK SUBDIVISION COASTAL MATER co.
CA^D. OPINES SUBDIVISION COASTAL WATER CO.
CHARLESTON COMM. OF PUBLIC WORKS
JAMES ISLAND UTILITY COMPANY
COASTAL WATER COMPANY
P.O. BOX 7014
ASwCROFT HALL SUBDIVISION
ORLEANS MOODS SUBDIVISION
CDiSTO BEACH WATER COMPANY
MATER COMPANY OF EDISTO BEACH
WHEELER MATER COMPANY
ELM VILLAGE TRAILER PARK WATER SUPPLY.
FOLLY BEACH MUNICIPAL MATER DEPTCITY
FORT JOHNSON WATER SUPPLY CHARLESTON MEDICAL SCHOOL
COASTAL UTILITY CO - GOOSE CREEK
ISLE OF PALMS WATER CO.
DUNMOVIN SUBDIVISION
"ONCKS CORNER CITY WATER WORKS CITY HALL
MOUNT PLEASANT CITY WATER WORKS CITY HALL
PARISH PLACE SUBDIVISION
HApE, A. D. WATER WORKS
»T. STEPHEN MUNICIPAL WATER WORKSCITY HALL
SUL^IVANS ISLAND CITY WATER WKS CITY HALL
MONCKS CORNER.S. CAROLINA 29461
GOOSE CREEK, s. CAROLINA 29445
GOOSE CREEK, s. CAROLINA 29461
GOOSE CREEK, s. CAROLINA 29445
CHARLESTON. S. CAROLINA 29401
CHARLESTON. S. CAROLINA 29401
CHARLESTON, S. CAROLINA 29401
EDISTO BEACH; s. CAROLINA 29438
EDISTO BEACH. S. CAROLINA 29438
EDISTO BEACH, S. CAROLINA 29438
CHARLESTON HEI8HTS, S.C. 29409
FOLLY BEACH, s.c. 29439
CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA 29401
GOOSE CREEK, s. CAROLINA 29449
ISLE OF PALMS. S. CAROLINA 29451
JOHNS ISLAND. S. CAROLINA 29459
MONCKS, CORNER, S. C. 29461
MOUNT PLEASANT. S. C. 29464
MOUNT PLEASANT. S. CAROLINA29464
PINOPOLIS, S. CAROLINA 29469
ST. STEPHEN. S. C. 29479
SULLIVANS ISLAND, S. C. 29482
"FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT THE REGIONAL REPRESENTATIVE, BUREAU OF WATER HYGIENE,
DHEW REGION IV, 50 SEVENTH STREET, NE, ROOM 4044, ATLANTA, GA. 30323. TEL: 404-526-54521
-------
32000COOOOOO
I. D. *
32C086200080
320096900590
320120850190
32rl20860l90
32Cl6l20ei90
320176400590
320178800080
320283600080
320422900590
32C482900590
320518410190
32C565300190
320607850080
320655800080
320708450190
320712500080
320761400590
320809600080
32C836I00190
320845300390
517036300130
517226600150
3172264H01SO
517340100150
517466400150
517631900150
517879750150
538004900310
3380504)00130
538074|00130
538160300310
538166*50130
538166*60130
538167300310
538238700130
338268800130
338281400830
338308000310
338343100310
538345150310
538378800310
530434700830
538434750830
538454400310
538462*00130
538486000310
338498400830
538522900130
538537000130
5385460C0830
I. D. *
SFOR FURTHER
SMSA
POP.
4800
1130
44000
4000
200C
100000
025
15000
55000
6014
650
65000
000
2RO
1500
140
1500
1500
650
744
6300
950
520
3300
5200
2000
1770
1300
2200
3400
850000
18000
11900
5000
179
1463
11000
3000
5030
060
1500C
5960
261
5300
7500
200
6200
4530
104
1600
POP.
INFORMA
433 WEST VAN BUREN :
LISTING or WATER SUPPLIES FROM THE "cwss*
SMS* — CINCINNATI! OHIO, KENTUCKY, INDIANA5 .
NAME OF SUPPLY
•DONE COUNTY HATER DISTRICT
BROMLEY WATER DEPT. CITY HALL
CAMPBELL CO. W.D. NO.l-FT.THOMASBOX 192
CAMPBELL CO.W.D.-HIGHLAND HGTS.
COLD SPRING MUN. WATER SUPPLY
COVlNGTON WATER WORKS DEPT. ROOM 208
W.J. CRAIG TRAILER PARK RT. NO.I
FLORENCE WATER AND SEWER CQMM. 7431 US ROUTE 42
KENTON co. w.o. NO.I* WINSTON PKHOWARD AND GRAND
LUDLOW WATES WORKS
"ENTQR W.O.-CALIF.«MENTOR-CARTH.
MEwPORI WATER WORKS DEPT. 2055 MEMORIAL PARKWAY
PETERSBURG COAL CO.
RIVtR RIDGE PARK INC.,TRAILER PKRIVER ROAD
SILVER GROVE PUN. WATER SUPPLY
-------
50COOOOOOOOO
I. D. *
538590100130
538617500310
538697300310
53875540083Q
538776300830
538786800830
336786810830
538835300310
538863730830
33886374Q83n
348863750830
338863760836
538863770830
538874300830
938901900130
936918900310
5MSA
POP.
3900
31000
15000
600
2720
2500
500
060
2111
5135
4067
991
637
1800
2200
10000
LISTING op WATER SUPPLIES FROM THE "cwss"
CINCINNATI. OHIO, KENTUCKY, INDIANA
NAME OF SUPPLY
CITY BLOS.
NORWOOD CITY
HALL
HEW RICHMOND CITY WATER SUPPLY
NORWOOD WATER DEPT.
READING WATER DEPT.
SHADOW LAKE VILLAGE TRAILER PK. RURAL ROUTE 1
?OutH LEBANON MUN. WATER SUPPLY CITY 8LDG.
SPRINGBORO SYSTEM-MILL STt PLANT
SPRlNGBORO SUPPLY.CHAUTAUQUA SYS
TWiGHTwEE COMMUNITY WELFARE CORPRT. 1
WARREN CO..FRANKLIN WATER OIST.
WARREN CO.-HAMILTON-DECRFIELD WATER DISTRICT
WARREN CO.-LEBANON WATER DlST. 903 N. BROADWAY.
WARREN CO.-PF.NNYRORAL WATER DISTWARREN CO. WATER
WARREN CO.-ROCHESTER WATER DIST.WARREN CO. WATER
fAYNESVILLE WATER DEPT.
WILLIAMSBURG MUN. WATER SUPPLY FIFTH ST.
WYOMING MUNICIPAL WATER SUPPLY 800 OAK ST.
BOX 96
DEPT.
DEPT.
NEW RICHMOND; OHIO 45157
NORWOOD. OHIO 49212
READING, OHIO 45215
MASON. OHIO 45040
SOUTH LEBANON. OHIO 45065
SPRINGBORO, OHIO 45066
SPRINGBORO, OHIO 45066
LOVELANO, OHIO 45036
LEBANON. OHIO 45036
LEBANON. OHIO 45036
LEBANON. OHIO 45036
LEBANON, OHIO 45036
LEBANON. OHIO *'036
WAYNESVILLE, OHIO 45068
WILLIAMSBURG. OHIO 45776
WYOMING, OHIO 45215
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT THE REGIONAL REPRESENTATIVE, BUREAU OF WATER HYGIENE, DHEW REGION V,
433 WEST VAN BUREN STREET, CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60607. TELl 312-353-7736.
-------
600000000000
I. D. *
619119901050
619248600460
619248450460
619268400460
619306000460
619337700460
619457800460
619457910460
619497920460
619497930460
619497940460
619465301050
619510400460
619675400460
619675440460
619675450460
619753000460
619858000460
619873450460
619993711030
619993721050
619993731050
619993741030
619993771030
628022200190
6280928001^0
628092850190
628092860190
628052870190
628092880190
628092890190
628075600486
628109300480
628155700240
628159930240
628155740240
628155950240
628155960240
628158400190
628184300190
628199800830
62822U00190
628229800190
628232300830
628258000240
628289800190
628289830190
628298200190
628308100240
628321000480
I. 0. *
SMSA
POP*
3600
2100
3500
412
12000
2373
160000
520
1500
1200
540
179923
480C
1500C
3266
050
1000
1080
1750
736
400
250
450
450
500
10000
335
085
050
070
1165
7000
1850
2600
750
600
450
700
250
280
760
760
245
400
10100
525
240
900
25000
750
POP.
LISTING OF MATER SUPPLIES FROM THE »C«SS"
&ANSAS CITY, MISSOURI *ND KANSAS'
NAME OF SUPPLY
•ONNER SPG. CITY WATER SUPPLY CITY MALL BLDG
OESOTO WATER DEPT. CITY HALL
SUNFLOWER ARMY AMMUNITION DEPOT
•DGERTON CITY MATER SUPPLY CITY HALL BIDS
J.C* NICHOLS CO* (FAIRWAY! KAN.1310 WARD PARKWAY
GARDNER CITY hATER SUPPLY CITY HALL BLD6
MATER DISTRICT N0.lt JOHNSON CO.5916 DEARBORN
RURAL WATER OIST. NO.l • JOHNSONCOUNTY
RURAL W.D. NO.2 - JOHNSON COUNTY
RURAL W.D. NO.3 - JOHNSON COUNTYBOX 105 ROUTE 2
RURAL W.D. NO.* • JOHNSON COUNTYROUTE 2* BOX 60
KANSAS CITY WATER WORKS 1211 NORTH 8TH STREET
1-ENExA MUNICIPAL WATER SUPPLY " "
CLATHE MUNICIPAL WATER WORKS
P.O. BOX 3293
CITY HALL
OLATHE NAVAL AIR STATION, USNAS
LAKE OLATHE TRAILER COURT
OUIVIRA INC. (QUIVIRA LAKE)
SPRING HILL WATER DEPT.
QUtCK-WAY HOMES, MATER SUPPLY
RURAL WATER DISTRICT NO.I
RURAL WATER DISTRICT NO.2.
RURAL WATER DISTRICT NC.3
RURAL WATER DISTRICT NO. 4,
ROUTE 3* BOX 114
(SUNFLOWER VILLAGE)
WYANDOTTE COUNTY• BETHEL
WYANDOTTE CO.. RT.l
WYANDOTTE COUNTY* P.O. BOX 244
WYANDOTTE COUNTY (BONNER SPSS.)
RURAL W.D.N0.7-WYANDOTTE 6 LEAVENWORTH CO.* 13724 ARCHER RD.
SRCHlE MUNICIPAL WATER SUPPLY
BELTQN MUNICIPAL WATER SUPPLY
JACKSON COUNTY WATER CO.
LAKESIDE GARDENS SUBDIVISION-
(DIKE'S ADDITION), P.O. BOX 183
RT. 2. BOX 22SA
LAZY ACRES TRAILER PARK
OLSON«S OASIS WELL TRAILER PARK RT. 2
WEST BELTON SERVICE Co.
BLUE SPRINGS WATER DEPT.
WUCKNER MUNICIPAL WATER SUPT.
P.O. BOX 349
903 MAIN STREET
ROUTE 4, BOX 242
P.O. BOX 161
BOX 227
CLAY COUNTY WATER DIST. NO. 2
CLAY COUNTY WATER DIST. NO. 3
CLAY COUNTY WATER DIST. NO. 4
CLAY COUNTY WATER DIST. NO. 5
CLAY COUNTY WATER DIST. NO. 6
CLEVELAND MUNICIPAL WATER SUPPLY
SREIGHTON MUNICIPAL WATER SUPPLY
DEARBORN MUN. WATER SUPPLY
WREXEL MUNICIPAL WATER SUPPLY
EAST LYNNE MUNICIPAL WATER SUP. CITY
SDsERTON MUN. WATER SUPPLY
EXCELSOIR SPRINGS WATER SUPPLY
FREEMAN MUNICIPAL WATER SUPPLY
LAKE ANNETTE WATER SUPPLY ROUTE i
GARDEN CITY MUNICIPAL WATER SUPPLY
GLADSTONE MUNICIPAL WATER SUPPLYBOX 10688
6RAIN VALLEY CITY WATER SUPPLY CITY HALL BUILDING
NAME OF SUPOLY
BONNEH SPRINGS. KANSAS 66012
DESOTOt KANSAS 66018
OESOTO» KANSAS 66019
EDGERTON. KANSAS 66021
KANSAS CITY* MISSOURI 64112
GARDNER. KANSAS 66030
SHAWNEE-MISSION. KANSAS 66202
OESOTO* KANSAS 66019
STILLWELL. KANSAS 66089
LENEXA* KANSAS 66218
OLATHE. KANSAS 66061
KANSAS CITY* KANSAS 66110
LENEXA* KANSAS 662IS
OLATHE* KANSAS 66061
OLATHE* KANSAS 66061
OLATHE. KANSAS 66061
KANSAS CITY* KANSAS 66106
SPRING HILL* KANSAS 66083
DE SOTO. KANSAS 66019
BETHEL* KANSAS 66074
BASEHOR* KANSAS 66007
BONNER SPRINGS. KANSAS 66012
BONNER SPRINGS. KANSAS 66012
BONNER SPRlNgS, KANSAS 66012
ARCHIE. MISSOURI 64725
BELTON. MISSOURI 64012
BELTON. MISSOURI 64012
BELTON. MISSOURI 64012
BELTON. MISSOURI 64012
BELTON. MISSOURI 64012
BELTON. MISSOURI 64012
BLUE SPRINGS, MISSOURI 64015
BUCKNER. MISSOURI 64016
LIBERTY. MISSOURI 64O68
HOLT* MISSOURI 64048
LIBERTY. MISSOURI 64048
LIBERTY, MISSOURI 64068
KEARNEY. MISSOURI 64060
CLEVELAND. MISSOURI 64734
CRClGHTON. MISSOURI 64739
DEARBORN. MISSOURI 64439
DREXEL* MISSOURI 64742
EAST LYNNE, MISSOURI 64743
EDGERTON. MISSOURI 64444
EXCELSOIR SPRINGS.MISSOURI 64024
FREEMAN, MISSOURI 64746
FREEMAN, MISSOURI 64746
GARDEN CITY* MISSOURI 64747
GLADSTONE* MISSOURI 64118
GRAIN VALLEY; MISSOURI 64029
o
o
'FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT THE REGIONAL REPRESENTATIVE! BUREAU OF WATER MY«IENE,
DHEM REGION VI, 601 EAST 12TH STREET, KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI 64106. TELi 81*-*?4-3036.
-------
LISTING OF WATER SUPPLIES FROM THE «CwSSn
60COOOOOOOOO
lo D0 0
SMSA
POPo
626351600190
628402&00480
628410V00480
6284lO?10480
628410920480
62841VV30480
628410740480
628421800480
628422400240
628442850480
628444700480
628443000830
628443300480
628455400240
628439300480
628468600240
628553000240
628587300240
628591000480
628614490830
628621Q00190
6?863600083n
628636040836
6?@636Q30830
628636060830
628636®7083h
629636080830
628636090830
628637800190
628667300190
628667Q00480
6j8678lOelQO
628744Q00240
628770000480
628791000830
628894900480
628832900830
6288*1800830
9000
116000
19000
19200
2600
1000
1600
690000
1000
7000
1200
1190
425
1200
19000
14000
390
6000
2000
9000
800
1900
210
500
920
904
1900
800
3700
400
18000
10000
1800
4000
240
137
796
1300
NOc
NOo
NOo
6945 SLUE R8DGE
PoOo SOX 216
CITYo MISSOURI AND
NAME op SUPPLY
HA8RIS0NVILLE WATER SUPPLY
MISSOURI WATER C00 U610 TRUMAR BLVDo
JACKSON COUNTY WATER DlSTo
JACKSON COUNTY WATER DISTo
JACKSON COUNTY WATER DI3Yo
JACKSON COUNTY WATER DISTO KQOIS
JACKSON COUNTY WATER DISTo NOol3f3Y040 BOJJ SJQ
KANSAS CITY MUNICIPAL WATER SUPPLYO 4i4 EO
KEARNEY MUNICIPAL HATER SUPPLY CITY HALL
LAKE CITY ARMY AMMUNITION PLANT WATER SUPPLY
LAKE TAPAWINGO WATER SUPPLY
LAKE WAUKOMI3 WATER SYSTEM
LAKE WINNEBAGO WATER SUPPLY
LAwSON MUNICIPAL WATER SUPPLY
LEI?°S SUMMIT MUNICIPAL WATER
LIBERTY MUNICIPAL WATER SUPPLY
MUNICIPAL WATER SUPPLY
KANSAS CITY WATER SUPPLY
OAK GROVE MUNICIPAL WATER SUPPLY
CITIES WATER C00
MUNICIPAL WATER SUPPLY
PLATTE CITY MUNo WATER SUPPLY
PLATTE COUNTY WATER DlSTo NOol
PLATYE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT 02
PLATYE COUNTY WATER DlSTo N00 3
PLATYE COUNYY WATER DISTRICT 04 BOK 129
COUNTY WATER DlSTo.N009
12TH STREET
189°A
1147 SHORE DRIVE
SUPPLY
CITY HALL BLDG0
CITY HALL BLDGo
CITY HALL BLDGo
BOH
PLATTE COUNTY WATER DJSTRieT"06 RTo
3
27
PLEASANT HILL MUNICIPAL WATER
9AYMQRE MUNICIPAL WATER SUPPLY
RAYTOWN WATER C00
RlCHARDSoGEBAUR AIR FORCE BASE
SMJTHVILLE WATER DEPT0
SUGAR CREEK WATER BEPT0
TRACY MUNICIPAL WATER SUPPLY
UNfTy VILLA6E WATER SUPPLY
UEATHER0Y LAKE MUNICIPAL WATER
WESTON MUNICIPAL WATER SUPPLY
PLANT
9Q20 E0 63RO 9TC
WATER SUPPLY
SYSYEMo ROUUE 22
GRANDVIgtio MISSOURI
RAYTObNo MISSOURI
BLUE SP0XN6Si MISSOURI
LEE»9 SuMMXTo MISSOURI
KANSAS CXTVo MISSOURI
MISSOURI
o MISSOURI
PARKVlLLio MISSOURI
GREENwOOOQo MISSOURI
LAWSeWo MISSOURI
LEE'S SUMMXTo MISSOURI
LIBERTVo MXSSOURX
MOSBYo MOo
NORTH KANSfiS ClTYo MOo
OAK SBOvEo MISSOURI
PARKVlLLEo MISSOURI
PECULlABo MISSOURI
PLATTE ClTYo MQ0
PARLEVo MISSOURI
CAMDiN P8XNTo MISSOURI
WESYONo MISSOURI
PLATTB ClTVo MISSOURI
WALDRONo M;SSOUR!
PARKVILLgo MISSOURI
PLEASANT HiLLo MISSOURI
RAYMOREo MgSSOUR!
RAYTOwNo MISSOURI
RlCHARDoggQAuRo MISSOURI
SMITHVlLLio MISS9UR!
SUGAR CREEKo MISSOURI
TRACYo MISSOURI
LEE'S SUMMlTo MISSOURI
pARKVlLLEo MISSOURI
WESTONo MISSOURI
64030
64190
34094
64106
64060
64090
640iS
64S.92
64034
64062
64063
6406Q
64073
64141
64079
64192
64078
64079
6402S
64018
6409Q
64079
64092
64192
64080
66083
64190
64030
64080
64034
64091
64063
64497
64098
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT THE REGIONAL REPRESENTATIVE, BUREAU OF WATER HYGIENE,
DHEW REGION VI, 601 EAST 12TH STREET, KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI 64106. TELs 816-374-3036.
-------
70COOOOOOOOO
I. C. *
721003900520
72l201»0052o
721201550520
721201960920
721201600520
721201*10520
721201*50520
721374400260
721386100260
721459300260
721459400260
721570700520
721574600520
721574650520
721574700520
721656500360
721656600360
721656900360
721692940520
721776500440
721776400440
721811800520
721811150520
721811300520
721837100520
721928200260
5MSA
POP.
1200
9000
595
160
048
300
700
3000
27000
201000
100000
1000
3300
499
775
632225
19900
200
120
50000
6400
12000
400
250
350
15000
MEM ORLEANS. LOUISIANA7
NAME OF SUPPLV
LISTING OF WATER SUPPLIES FROM THE "CWSS"
COVINGTON-WATER DEPT.' " ^IMSS"^?)!^
SSSrW!!? !ui^?IOEWATER UU^^M^30 R°B'NHOO° ^^WKSl ^tiMS
RIVER FOREST SUBDIVISION
RIVERWOOD UTILITY CORP. 230 ROBINHOOD DRIVE
TCHEFUNCTA CLUB ESTATES RT.l
GRAND ISLE WATER DEPT.
GRETNA UArER DEPT. 100 FIFTH STREET
JEFFERSON PARRISH W.W. DIST.NQ.1POST OFFICE BOX 10007
JEFFERSON PARISH W.to. DIST. NO.24500 WEST BANK EXP.
MADISONVILLE MATER DEPT.
•ANDEVILLE V.ATER OEPT.
FOUNTAINBLEAU STATE PARK
SOUTHEAST LOUISIANA HOSPITAL
MEW ORLEANS S6W RD.-CARROLLTON SYSTEM, CITY HALL
MEW ORLEANS S&W BD.-ALGIERS SYSTCITY HALL
COVINGTON. LOUISIANA
COVINGTON. LOUISIANA
COVINGTON, LOUISIANA
GRAN0 ISLE, LOUISIANA
GRETNA. LOUISIANA
NEW ORLEANS. LA.
MARRERO. LA.
MADISONVILLE. LA.
MANDEVILLE, LOUISIANA
MANDEVILLE. LOUISIANA
MANDEVILLE. LOUISIANA
NEW ORLEANS* LOUISIANA
NEW ORLEANS. LOUISIANA
VENETIAN ISLES WATER SYSTEM 13232 CHEF MENTUER HWY.BOX 29188NEW ORLEANS. LA.
PEARL RIVER AND OZONE WATER co.
ST.BERNARD PARISH W.WKS.DIST. HIP.O. BOX 1278
ST.BERNARD PARISH W.WKS.DIST. #2sr. BERNARD HWY.. EAST
SLlDCLL MATER OEPT.
COUNTRY CLUB ESTATES (SLIDELL) MATER SUPPLY
TAMHANY MOBILE HOME PARK 101 BOSMORTH
•UN WATER DEPT.
WESTwEGO WATER DEPT. 415 AVENUE A
PEARL RIVER* LOUISIANA
CHALMETTE. LOUISIANA
ST. BERNARD. LOUISIANA
SLIDELL. LOUISIANA
SLIDELL. LOUISIANA
SLIDELL. LOUISIANA
SUN. LOUISIANA
WESTWEGO, LOUISIANA
70420
70*33
70433
70433
70433
70433
70433
70358
70053
70121
70076
70447
70448
70448
70448
70112
70112
70129
70492
70043
70085
70458
70458
70458
70463
70094
7FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT THE REGIONAL REPRESENTATIVE, BUREAU OF WATER HYGIENE,
DHEW REGION VII, 1114 COMMERCE STREET, DALLAS, TEXAS 75202. TEL: 214-749-2118.
-------
8CCOOOOOOOOO
I. D. *
807075600510
807075670510
807079400510
807086400510
807181000510
80774520051Q
807745250510
807745360510
807745310510
807745320510
807745330510
807745340510
807745350510
807743360510
807745370510
8C7745380510
8r7745390510
807745400510
807745410510
807793100516
5MSA
POP.
500
150
035
600
160
104000
150
150
050
350
250
050
120
3500
072
600
175
015
060
500
LISTING OF WATER SUPPLIES FROM THE "CwSS"
— PUFBLO. COLORADO'
NAME OF SUPPLY
BEULAH WATER DISTRICT
PUfBLO MOUNTAIN PARK WATER SYST.RT.li BOX 49
•LrNDE W?TEP SUPPLY 2001 SANTE PE DRIVE
900NE WATEP DISTRICT BOX 68
COLORADO CITY WATER & SAN. DIST.
PUEBLO MATER WORKS
•UCClARELLI WATER SUPPLY-PUEBLO 1201 SOCORRC PLACE
CHERRY LANE WATER SUPPLY 646 CHERRY LANE
MfiKLAND WATER SUPPLY, T.P. RYE STAR ROUTE
»ES* SOFT WATER 2129 SOUTH ROAD
O'NEAL WATER SUPPLY 8TH AND COURT
PUEBLO GARDENS WATER CO. 4505 GOODNIGHT AVE.
RivERDALE CLUB PARK WATER SYSTEMRT. 2, BOX 181
ST. CHARLES MESA WATER SUPPLY RT.4,BOX 9i ROSELAWN &
ST. JOSEPH WATER SUPPLY P.O. BOX 367
SALT CREEK WATER ASSN. 1421 LOREDO
SANDERS WATER SUPPLY 1712 LYNWOOO LANE
SUNSET MOBILE PARK WATER SUPPLY 602 ACERO
SUNSET VIEW WATER ASSN. 4535 GOODNI6HT AVE.
RYE CITY WATER SUPPLY
BEULAHt COLORADO 81023
BEULAHi COLORADO 81023
PUEBLO i COLORADO 81004
BOONE, COLORADO 81025
COLORADO CITY. COLORADO 81069
PUEBLO, COLORADO 81002
PUEBLO, COLORADO 81004
PUEBLO. COLORADO 81005
PUEBLO* COLORADO 81004
PUEBLO. COLORADO 81001
PUEBLO, COLORADO 81003
PUEBLO. COLORADO sioos
PUEBLO, COLORADO 81004
SOUTH RDSPUEBLOt COLORADO 81004
PUEBLO. COLORADO 81002
PUEBLO. COLORADO 81004
PUEBLO* COLORADO 81004
PUEBLO. COLORADO 81005
PUEBLO* COLORADO 81005
RYE, COLORADO 81005
o
CO
'FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT THE REGIONAL REPRESENTATIVE, BUREAU OF WATER HYGIENE, BHEW REGION VIII.
19TH AND STOUT STREETS, DENVER, COLORADO 80202. TEL: 303-297-3709.
-------
90COOOOOOOOO
I. D. *
909003000360
909016890960
909023900360
909026490330
909027610360
909027700360
90SOZ7T30360
909027760960
905027780360
909027810360
909027830360
909027840360
909027890360
909027900360
909027910360
905033700360
905033*00360
909049*30360
909045190360
909049800330
909049900330
909049990330
909091400360
909092000366
909099810330
909095890330
905069900360
909069*10360
903069*20360
909069640360
905079290360
909079390360
909079400360
909080490360
909081*00330
909081110330
909108*10330
905108*20330
903108*90330
909112290330
903112900330
905112400330
905112*00330
903139290330
909139270330
909142900360
909143490360
909149300330
905153000360
9C5153010360
I. 0. *
SMSA
POP.
2500
060
050
038
250
200
8000
200
025
1800
052
1000
170
100
200
1400
1400
040
175
13500
150
150
18000
932
040
9495
4000
8460
2700
3500
1033
2100
5000
130
7400
160
300
559
500
000
540
7500
320
4141
090
1707
2000
150
13000
100
POP.
LISTING OF WATEN SWUM FROM THE "Cwss*
SMSA — SAN BERNARDINO-RIVERSIDE-ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA*
NAME OF SUPPLY
•DF.LANTO COMM. SERVICE DISTRICT 11740 BARTLITT AVENUE
SAPPHIRE MUTUAL WATER CO. '9140 N. SAPPHIRE ST.
GLEN MARTIN MUTUAL WATER CO*
OE ANZA MUTUAL MATER co.. INC.
APPLE VALLEY HEIGHTS CtW. OIST. 9196 FLORA VISTA RD.
AZTEC WATER COMPANY
APPLE VALLEY RANCHO WATER CO. *IP.O. BOX 1
APpLE VALLEY RANCHO W.CO. NO.2 P.O. BOX 1 (BELLEVIEW H)
APPLE VALLEY TERRACE WATER CO.
S. CAL W.C. - VICTORVILLE NO. 1
. VICTORVILLE NO. 3
. VICTORVILLE NO.4
23999 SOUTH ROAD
S. CAL N.C.
3. CAL Vi.C.
S. CAL W.C. - VICTORVILLE NO. 5
YOUNQTOWNE WATER CO.
APPLE VALLEY FOOTHILL C W D
ARROWBEAR PARK COUNTY WATER DisT3286i HILLTOP BLVD.
CAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST
BAKER MATER COMPANY BAKER RD. AT HIGHWAY 127
B.H. MURDOCK-BFLL TEL HOUSING
BANNING CITY WATER SUPPLY
MOUNTAIN WATER co. 12.727 HIGHLAND HOME RD.
BANNING HEIGHTS MUTUAL WATER CO.BOX 367
S. CAL h.C. - BARSTOW
BARSTOW HEIGHTS COMM SER DlST.
GLEN EYRIE HEIGHTS MUT.WATER CO*
BEAUMONT IRRIGATION DISTRICT 960 MAGNOLIA
BIG BEAR CITY COMMUNITY SER DIST
S. CAL ta.C. . BEAR VALLEY BOX 1947
S. CAL W.C. . BIG BEAR PINES BOX 1947
MOONRIDGE MUTUAL WATER CO.
feRESTMORE VILLAGE WATER CO.
MARYGOLO MUTUAL WATER CO.
S. CAL W.C. - BLOOMINGTON
UE MENT WATER co.
•LYTHE CITY WATER SUPPLY
DESERT VERDE MUTUAL WATER CO.
CABAZON WATER COMPANY
JENSEN WATER CO.
CABAZON COUNTY WATER DISTRICT
G.GARDNER HATER CO.
HARRY SLACK DOMESTIC WATER CO
»OuTH MESA MUTUAL WATER CO.
CALIMESA WATER DISTRICT
DESERT WATER AGENCY
FLYING «H» MUTUAL WATER co.
ARROWHEAD MANOR WATER co.
CEDARPINES PARK MUTUAL WATER CO.P. 0. BOX 69
BONITA VISTA MUTUAL WATER CO. 9309 OAK GLEN RD.
CHINO MUNICIPAL WATER SYSTEM P.O. BOX 667
MOUNTAIN VIEW PARK-MUT. WATER COROUTE 3 BOX 109
NAME OF SUPPLY
9715 AOLER
P. 0. BOX 729
P.O. BOX 201
P.O. BOX 133
MAIN AND BROADWAY
P.O. BOX 297
391 WEST AvE "L"
P.O. BOX 2
ADELANTO. CALIF. 92901
ALTA LOMA. CALIFORNIA 91701
ANGELUS OAKS. CALIF 92309
ANZA, CALIFORNIA 92906
APPLE VALLEY. CALIF. 92307
APPLE VALLEY CALIF. 92907
APPLE VALLEY* CALIF 92907
APPLE VALLEY. CALIF. 92907
APPLE VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92907
APPLE VALLEY! CALIF. 92907
APPLE VALLEY. CALIF. 92907
APPLE VALLEY. CALIF. 92907
APPLE VALLEY. CALIF 92907
APPLY VALLEY, CALIF. 92349
APPLE VALLEY* CALIFORNIA 92307
ARROWBEAR LAKE* CALIF. 92908
ARROWHEAD SPRINGS* CALIF. 92400
8AKER. CALIFORNIA 92909
AKER. CALIF. 92909
BANNING. CALIF. 92220
BANNING. CALIFORNIA 92220
BANNING, CALIFORNIA 92220
BARSTOW. CALIFORNIA 92911
BARSTOW. CALIF. 92911
BEAUMONT. CALIFORNIA 92223
BEAUMONT. CALIFORNIA 92223
BIG BEAR CITY. CALIF. 92914
BIG BEAR LAKE. CALIF. 92919
BIG BEAR LAKE. CALIF. 92919
BIG BEAR LAKE* CALIF. 92919
BLOOMINGTON, CALIF. 9291*
BLOOMINGTON. CALIF. 92916
BLOOMINGTON. CALIF. 92916
BLUE JAY* CALIF. 92917
BLYTHE* CALIF. 92229
BLYTHE* CALIFORNIA 92229
CABAZON. CALIF. 92230
CABAZON. CALIF. 92230
CABAZON. CALIF. 92230
CALIMESA. CALIF. 92320
CALIMESA, CALIF. 92920
CALIMESA, CALIF. 92920
CALIMESA, CALIFORNIA 92920
PALM SPRINGS. CALIF. 92262
CATHEDRAL CITY* CALIF. 92234
CEDAR GLEN. CALIF. 92321
CEDARPINES, CALIF. 92922
CHERRY VALLEY. CALIF. 92229
CHINO. CALIF 91710
CHINO. CALIF. 91710
9FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT THE REGIONAL REPRESENTATIVE, BUREAU OF WATER HYGIENE, DHEW REGION IX,
50 FULTON STREET, SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94102. TEL: 415-556-5677
-------
9CCOOOOOOOOO
It D. *
905153020360
905193040360
905153050360
9C5153410360
905166800330
9C5166330330
905166340330
909166950330
909166369330
909166970330
909166380330
909166390330
909166*00330
909166*10330
905166*20330
905166*30350
909166*^0330
909166*90930
909166460310
909166470330
909166*80330
909166*90330
909166900336
909166910330
903171600360
909171420360
909171690360
909171M0330
905171T00360
909171T90360
909171760360
909179*00330
909179*90330
909189610360
909189620360
909189630360
905189690360
909189660360
905189*90360
909190890360
909194100360
909198*90360
909219490330
909216010330
909216100330
9092161103)0
909216790360
905216890360
905232650330
905234300360
I. D. *
SMSA
POP.
740
5700
3318
000
7515
042
423
1750
119
133
086
970
397
1490
100
112
1730
2700
060
170
4760
1919
1310
379
19900
2000
132
173
4500
114
200
30000
3000
300
190
9500
2000
700
2500
150
16000
400
190
200
4583
603
075
490
3500
150
POP.
LISTING OF WATER SUPPLIES FROM THE "Cw5S"
SAN BERNARDINO-RIVERSIDE-ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
NAME OF SUPPLY
WATER co.
POMONA VALLEY WATER CO
s. CAL w.c. CHINO, WATER SUPPLY 321 YALE AVE.
OHiNo BASIN MUNICIPAL WATER oisT8555 ARCHIBALD AVE.
COACHELLA CITY WATER SUPPLY 1515 SIXTH STREET
COACH VAL.CWD-BERMUDA DUNES P. 0. BOX 1098
COACH VAL CWD-COOK ROAD P.O. BOX 1038
COACH VAL CWD-DATE PALM DRIVE P.O. BOX lose
COACH. VAL. CWD-DEL SOL RD. P.O.
COACH. VAL. CUD-JACKSON ST. P.O.
BOX
BOX
1098
lose
CCACH. VAL. C.W.D. -JEFFERSON ST. P.O. BOX 1098
COACH.
P.O. BOX 1098
.0. BOX 1098
.0. BOX 1098
.0. BOX 1098
•0. BOX 1098
.0. BOX 1098
.0. BOX 1098
.0. BOX 1098
.0. BOX 1098
.0. BOX 1098
.0. BOX 1098
.0. BOX 1098
.0. BOX 1098
650 N. 8TH. STREET
919 WEST F ITREET
CWD-I.D. «8
COACH. VAL. CWD-I.D. #10
COACH. VAL. CWD-I.D. #11
COACH. VAL.CWD-COACHELLA HEIGHTS
COACH. VAL. CWD-HIDDEN SPGS
COACH. VAL. CWD-INDIAN WELLS
COACH. VAL. CWO»PALM CITY
COACH. VAL. CWD-LA QUINTA
COACH. VAL. CWD-NAIROBI
COACH. VAL. CWD-PALM DESERT
COACH. VAL. CWO-THOUSAND PALMS
COACH. VAL. CWD-TAMARISK
COACH. VAL. CWD-THERMAL
COLTON MUNICIPAL WATER SUPPLY
TERRACE WATER CO.
E. COLTON HEIGHTS MUT. WATER co.
RECHE CANYON WATER CO. 7080 RECHE CANYON RD.
RIVERSIDE HIGHLANDS WATER co.
TRINITY MUTUAL WATER CO.
SULLIVAN MUTUAL WATER CO.
CORONA CITY WATER CO.
HOME GARDENS MATER COMPANY
ARROWHEAD HIGHLANDS MUT. SER. COP.O. BOX 1002
HORSESHOE BEND MTN. CLU& MUTUAL WATER ASSN.. 127 w. BIXBY RD
LAKE GREGORY WATER CO.
VALLEY OF ENCHANTMENT MUT. WATERCOMPANY t BOX 610
VALLEY VIEW MUTUAL WATER CO. P.O. BOX 301
tRCSTLlNE VILLAGE COUNTY W, DIST
RROw CREST WATER ASSN. CREST PARK
CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DlST. 96*1 SAN BERNARDINO RD.
KAcGETT WATER COMPANY
LAKE TAMARISK C. SER. AREA N0.91P.O. BOX 9!.»
DOS PALMOS MUTUAL WATER CO.
DESERT HOT SPGS. CwD > ID NO. 1 6947 SECOND STREET
DESERT HOT SPGS. CWD-N. PALM SPGS 6547 SECOND STREET
DESERT VIEW CO. WATER DISTRICT
OEVORE MUTUAL WATER CO.
5AGLE MOUNTAIN-KAISER MINE P.O. BOX 158
s. CAL. we . E. BARSTOW
NAME OF SUPPLY
12710 LA CADENA DRIVE
11699 RICHE CANY.
CHINO. CALIF. 91710
CHINO* CALIFORNIA 91710
CLAREMONTt CALIF. 91711
CUCAMON8A, CALIF. 91730
COACHELLA* CALIF. 92236
COACHFLLA, CALIF. 92336
COACHELLA* CALIF. 92336
COACHELLA, CALIF. 92336
COACHELLA, CALIF. 92336
COACHELLA, CALIF. 92336
COACHELLA, CALIF. 92336
COACHELLA, CALIF. 92336
COACHELLA, CALIF. 92336
COACHELLA, CALIF. 92336
COACHELLA, CALIF. 92336
COACHELLA* CALIF. 92396
COACHELLA* CALIF. 92336
COACHELLA* CALIF. 92396
COACHELLA* CALIF. 92396
COACHELLA, CALIF. 92336
COACHELLA, CALIF. 92336
COACHELLA, CALIF. 92336
COACHELLA, CALIF. 92336
COACHELLA, CALIF. 92336
COLTON, CALIF. 92324
COLTON, CALIF. 92324
COLTON, CALIF. 92324
COLTON* CALIF. 92324
COLTON. CALIF. 9232*
COLTON, CALIF. 9232*
COLTON, CALIF. 92324
CORONA* CALIF. 91720
CORONA, CALIF. 91720
CRESTLINE. CALIF. 92329
LONG BEACH, CALIF. 90807
CRESTLINE* CALIF. 92329
CRESTLINE, CALIF. 92323
CRESTLINE, CALIF. 92329
CRESTLINE* CALIF. 92329
BLUE JAY. CALIFORNIA 92317
CUCAMQNSA, CALIF. 91730
OAGGETT. CALIFORNIA 92327
DESERT CENTER, CALIF. 92241
DESERT HOT SPRINGS, CALIF. 92740
DESERT HOT SPRINGS, CALIF. 92240
DESERT HOT SPRINGS, CALIF. 92240
YUCCA VALLEY; CALIFORNIA 92284
DEVORE, CALIF. 92*09
EAGLE MOUNTAIN, CALIF. 92241
BARSTOW. CALIF. 92311
-------
900000000000
I. D. *
909234990330
909234900390
909234*103*0
9092399003*0
90523*110330
9092439003*0
90924*400330
90924AG20390
90924*|90330
90924*900330
9092944103*0
9092*34003*0
9092*71*0390
9092748303*0
90927+8903*0
9092757103*0
909279*203*0
9052759903*0
9092759403*0
9092854003*0
909299000330
9093138903*0
9093919*03*0
9093318703*0
90333640*330
909331420390
9033+20193*0
9093420203*0
9093438103*0
9093+38203*0
9093+*8903*0
905363*10390
9099*7100330
9053*7110330
9093*7120330
9093*7190330
909367190330
903381G303«0
909383*00360
9093840993*0
903389*00330
909402*00330
903408*003*0
909408*403*0
909408*503*0
909410900330
90941919Q330
909+191*0330
9C9+19I00330
909+20190330
I. D. *
SMSA
POP.
2900
30000
300
28000
3500
03*
2900
1800
2000
3+30
1900
1200
3900
129
+9000
900
100
100
1200
100
3500
300
100
600
9000
198
8100
130
9930
+00
130
1300
12000
3*0
7*0
1*00
088
800
+900
190
11000
073
7560
050
+20
1+000
3T3
125
1728
16000
POP.
LISTING Of NATEH SUPPLIES MOM THE "CwSS"
SAN BERNARDINO-RIVERS1DE«ONTARIO« CALIFORNIA
NAME OF SUPPLY
EAST BLYTHE COUNTY WATER OIST. iso*8 COTTONNOOO CANE
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT2+3S3 SAN jACINTO
EAST HIGHLANDS DOMESTIC WATER CO
E. SAN BERNARDINO CO.WATER DlST.
BOX SPRINGS MUTUAL WATER CO. 21740 DRACEA
CHAMISAL MUTUAL WATER CO. P.O. BOX 130
ELSINORE MUNICIPAL WATER SUPPLY CITY "LOG.
BLYTHE* CALIFORNIA
HEMET* CALIFORNIA
EAST HIGHLANDS* CALIF.
SAN BERNARDINO. CALIF.
EDfJEMQNT* CALIF.
HR8H: Bfclfc
ELSINORE W.D. - LAKELAND
ELSINORE W.D. - COUNTRY CLUB
ELSINORE VALLEY MUN. WATER OlST.1*755 GRAND AVE.
iOUTHWEST W.C. - ETIWANDA DIST. 7110 ETIWANDA AVE.
FAWNSKIN MUTUAL WATER CO.
FERN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
CRAWFORD CANYON MUT. W.C.
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY WATER CO.
•IG PINE TRACT WATER CO.
ffALLSVALE SERVICE COMPANY
FOREST PARK MUTUAL WATER CO.
949*8 UPPER PINE COURT
1*803 SPRING AVE.
124 N. CARMALITA ST.
9174 1 STREET
7045 PALM
7610 LANKERSHIM STREET
iOREsT HOME CHRIST. CQNF.
BROOKINGS PIPELINE MUT. WATER CO
GLEN AVON HEIGHTS MUT. WATER CO.
GREEN VALLEY MUTUAL WATER CO*
RAvASU WATER CO.
NAVASU LANDING WATER SUPPLY
MEMET CITY WATER SUPPLY
LAKE HEMET NWD-D * S WATER CO.
HESPERIA WATER SYSTEM
HESPERIA WATER CO.-TRACT 9*94
s. CAL. w.c. • HIGHLAND
LANKERSHIM ST. MUT. WATER co.
HIN*LEY VALLEY WATER CO.
IDYLLWILD COUNTY WATER DISTRICT 29949 BANNING
INOIO CITY WATER SUPPLY DRAWER 1788
lOE-OEL HEIGHTS MUT. WATER ASSN.
CARVER TRACT MUT, WATER CO. P.O. BOX 10f
OASIS PALMS WATER CO.(N. INDIO) ++-221C JACISON
WESTWARD HO SERVICE Co.
RANDSBURG WATER CO.
JOSHUA BASIN COUNTY WATER DIST
PANORAMA HEIGHTS WATER COMPANY
JURUPA COMMUNITY SERVICE DIST.
LA CADENDA MUTUAL WATER CO.
ARROWHEAD UTILITY CO*
LAKE FOREST SERVICE CO. P.O. BOX 10
CSKDE°SlM??M!NTIiPCA0L'WATER DIST.
LA GUINTA WATER COMPANY
DESERT CLUB MUTUAL WATER CO.
SANTA CARMELITA MUTUAL WATER CO.
•OuTH WEST wATER CO.
NAME OF SUPPLY
ELSINORE. CALIF.
ELSINORE. CALIF.
ELSINORE. CALIF.
ETIWANOA. CALIF.
FAWNSKIN, CALIF.
IDYLLWILD. CALIFORNIA
ETIWANOA* CALIF.
FONTANA, CALIFORNIA
FOREST FALLS; CALIF.
FOREST FALLS. CALIF.
FOREST FALLS. CALIF.
FOREST FALLS. CALIF.
FREDALBA, CALIF.
GLEN AVON HEIGHTS* CALIF.
GREEN VALLEY LAKE* CALIF.
HAVASU LAKE. CALIF.
HAVASU LAKE. CALIF.
HEMET. CALIF.
LAKE HEMET, CALIF.
HESPERIA WATER C0.**3*9 SUNSET BLOS ANGfLES. CALIF.
SPCRIA*
HE!
CALIF.
HIGHLAND. CLAIP.
HIGHLAND. CALIF.
HINKLEY. CALIF.
IDYLLWILD* CALIFORNIA
INOIO. CALIF.
INDIO. CALIF.
ST., PO BOX 8*7
BOX WWW INDIO. CALIF.
JOHANNESBURG SUPPLY RANOSBURC* CALIF,
P.O.BOX *79**1771.29 PALMS HWY. JOSHUA TREE. CALIF.
JOSHUA TREE. CALIF.
•«2i JURUPA RD. RIVERSIDE* CALIFORNIA
P.O. BOX 108* -' -
RIVERSIDE* CALIF.
LAKE ARROWHEAD!
(DEVELOPMENT CORP.) BOX 99
LA SIERRA WAY
LA GUINTA, CALIF.
LA GUINTA. CALIF.
LA GUINTA. CALIF.
LA SIERRA. CALIF.
92225
92949
92319
9240)
92508
92390
92330
92990
91799
92993
92949
91799
92995
92999
92999
92999
92999
929B9
92509
92941
929*9
929*9
•29*9
929*9
•0028
9002*
9294*
9294*
92947
92949
92201
tttfti
9fttl
92201
99554
92252
92252
92509
92902
92992
92992
92992
92943
92253
92253
92253
92505
-------
900000000000
I. 0. *
905429320360
909429330360
905435*00360
9C5444010360
9G5444020360
9C5444J00360
905459*00360
905459*10360
905459430360
905459450360
905459460360
905459*70360
905459480360
905459490360
905459500360
90546U50360
905474510360
905484100330
905487820360
909487900360
905499210330
905499290310
905512300360
905516450360
909516910360
905516T20360
9Q552U00360
905521150360
905521200360
905527*90330
905527800360
905527810360
9^5527820360
905528400330
90553160036Q
9*5534650360
905542450360
905543000330
9055*9000330
905569|00360
909579020330
909979090330
9099792003)0
905579620330
909579480330
905584410360
905584420360
90558*430360
905594600330
9(15597650360
I. D. *
SMSA
POP.
050
2448
030
310
575
411
030
044
013
250
100
075
0*5
033
220
150
550
500
1600
200
4500
5500
29000
200
1400
1700
- 350
175
250
325
7500
3500
2890
400
4900
150
200
11800
1000
63000
250
425
2500
23400
460
480
300
100
3300
340
POP.
LISTING OF WATER SUPPLIES FROM THE ?CwSS"
SAN BERNARDINO-RIVERSIDE-ONTARIO. CALIFORNIA
NAME OF SUPPLY
HI DESERT WATER co.
s. CAL. w.c. - LENWOOD
LITTLE MORONGO HEIGHTS WATER ASN
COURT STREET WATER COMPANY
INTER CITY MUTUAL WATER CO.
LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY
LU VALLEY MUTUAL WATER co.
DESERT DAWN MUTUAL WATER co.
CENTER WATER CO.
JUBILEE MUTUAL WATER CO.
LUCERNE VALLEY MUTUAL WATER CO.
LUCERNE VISTA WATER CO.
S. CAL W.C.-VICTORVILLE 6«L ZONE
STEWART WATER COMPANY
S. CAL W.C.-VICTORVILLE 6.U ZONE
LYTLE SPRINGS WATER COMPANY
MARIANA RANCHOS C.W.D.
MECCA WATER & DEVELOPMENT CO.
«ENTONE DOMESTIC WATER co.
MILL CREEK MUTUAL SERVICE CO.
»IRA LOMA WATER CO. (MIRA LOMA)
SANTA ANA RIVER WATER CO.
MONTE VISTA COUNTY WATER DIST.
HACIENDA WATER ASSOCIATION INC.
S. CAL. W.C. «. MORONGO VALLEY
S. CAL. W.C. - DEL NORTE
•AN ANTONIO CANYON MUT. SERV. CO
5NOMCRE9T HGTS.DEVELOPMENT ASSN.
MT, BALDY IMP. 6 WATER ASSN.
MURRlETA MUTUAL WATER CO.
MUSCOY MUTUAL WATER CO. NO.I
SAN BERN WATER UTIL. CORP.
S. CAL. W.C. - MUSCOY
«YONA DUNES MUTUAL WATER CO.
NEEDLES CITY WATER SUPPLY
24198 CAROLINE ST.
67-105 LINCOLN ST..P.O
ROUTE It BOX 278
BOX 94228
P.O. BOX 61
10375 CENTRAL AVE.
SOX 972 (DEL-SUR)
2167 DARBY STREET
3170 STATE ST.
7045 PLAM ST.
(BURMUDA DUNES SUPPLY)
1011 FRONT ST.
SANTA FE RR-LUDLOW & AMBOY W.SUPWATER SUPPLY
(MOUNTAIN PASS OPR.)
P.O. BOX 158
P.O. BOX 166
229 S. EUCLID AVE.
BOX 93
MOLYBDENUM CORP. OF AMERICA
HORCO COMM. SERVICE DISTRICT
8UEVO WATER COMPANY
BNTARIO MUNICIPAL WATER SUP
BEEP CANYON WATER CO.
PANORAMA MUTUAL WATER co.
PALM DESERT COMMUNITY SER. DIST.44900 PORTO.A
DESERT WATER AGENCY
THUNDERBlRD WATER CO.
BLACK MEADOW LANDING WATER SUP. P.O. BOX 98
SCHO LODGE WATER SUPPLY
FISHING VILLAGE WATER SUPPLY
KERRIS MUNICIPAL WATER SUPPLY
SHEEP CREEK WATER CO.
NAME OF SUPPLY
PO BOX B
P.O. BOX 14
101 "D" STREET
LENWOOD, CALIF. 923H
LENWOOD, CALIFORNIA 92311
LITTLE MORONGO HEIGHTS. CA92296
LOMA LINDA, CALIF. 92394
LOMA LINDA, CALIF. 92354
LOMA LINDA, CALIF. 92394
LUCERNE VALLEY, CAi IF. 92356
LUCERNE VALLEY, CALIF. 92396
LUCERNE VALLEY, CALIF. 92394
LUCERNE VALLEY, CALIF. 92396
LUCERNE VALLEY, CALIF. 92356
LUCERNE VALLEY, CALIF. 92356
LUCERNE VALLEY, CALIF. 92356
LUCERNE VALLEY, CALIF. 92356
LUCERNE VALLEY. CALIF. 92336
LYTLE CREEK. CALIF. 92358
VICTOHVILLE. CALIF. 92392
.DRAWER708MECCA. CALIF. 92254
MENTONE. CALIF. 92359
MENTONE, CALIF, 92399
LOS ANGELES. CALIF. 90054
MIRA LOMAt CALIF. 91752
MONTCLAIR, CALIF. 91763
MORONGO VALLEY, CALIF. 92294
MORONGO VALLEY, CALIF. 92256
MORONGO VALLEY, CALIF. 92256
MT. BALDYt CALIF. 91799
MOUNT BALDY. CALIF. 91759
MT BALDY, CALIFORNIA 91799
MURRlETA, CALIF. 92362
SAN BERNARDINO, CALlF. 92409
MUSCOYt CALIF. 92404
HIGHLANDS* CALIF. 92346
LA QUINTA AIRPORT, CALIF. 92293
NEEDLES. CALIF. 92363
NEWBERRY, CALIF. 92365
NiPTON, CALIF. 92366
NORCO. CALIF. 91760
NUEVO. CALIFORNIA 92367
ONTARIO. CALIF. 91761
PALM DESERT. CALIF. 92260
PALM DESERT. CALIF. 92260
PALM DESERT. CALIF. 92260
PALM SPRINGS. CALIF. 92262
PALM SPRINGS. CALIF. 922J2
PARKER DAM. CALIF. 92267
PARKER DAM, CALIF. 92267
PARKER DAM, CALIF* 92267
PERRIS. CALIF. 92370
PHELAN* CALIF. 92371
-------
900000000000
I. D. t
905602210330
903605*0036n
965606*00360
905631350330
903631800330
905636000360
905636020330
905636050330
9C3642800360
903647760360
905647770360
905647780360
905655100330
905655130330
90S653|40330
905635a50330
9056531*0330
9*5655370330
903653980330
903664)18330
903664920330
903664140330
903665)00360
905674400360
905674410360
909674^70360
903674480366
90367449*360
903674fl0360
90367492o36n
903674530360
905674540360
903674550360
9056749*0360
905674)70360
905674380360
9036T45,9«360
903674*20360
905674*30360
903674*40360
905674*10360
903682100330
903682120330
905726*50360
9*5726*80360
905741350360
903741960360
903760400360
903760810330
903760820330
I. D. *
SMSA
POP.
223
300
030
860
1900
40000
040
040
19500
655
300
030
120000
600
234
350
450
085
055
210
068
12000
3750
100500
170
100
450
400
750
1485
100
435
350
036
608
173
900
350
6000
502
13000
4000
1200
1700
400
2000
1200
200
5000
832
POP.
LISTING OF MATER SUPPLIES FROM THE "CwSS"
SAN BERNARDINO-RIVERSIDE-ONTARIO. CALIFORNIA
P.O. BOX 174
P.O. BOX 18*
CITY HALL
RT. 2* BOX 711
NAME OF SUPPLY
PINE COVE COUNTY MATER DISTRICT 24917 MARION RIDGE* PINE COVE
SMlTHSON SPRINGS MATER CO. P.O. BOX 185
PIONEERTOWN WATER SUPPLY
EASTERN M.M.D. - RANCHO CALIF.
RANCHO MIRAGF WATER COMPANY
RERLANOS CITY WATER SUPPLY
EL CASO RESORT KATER SUPPLY
FI SHERMANS RETRFAT WATER SUPPLY RT. 2* BOX 720
RIALTQ MUNICIPAL WATER DEPT. 150 SOUTH PALM ST.
S. CAL. W.C. - RIM FOREST
BURNT MILL CNYN. MUT.W 6 DEV ASN
BURNT MILL HEIGHTS WATER ASSN.
RIVERSIDE CITY WATER SUPPLY P.O. BOX 82*
FORT FREMONT MUTUAL WATER CO. 3884 MENNES AVE.
INTEu COUNTY WATER CO. 3975 7TH ST.
tRESTMORE HEIGHTS MUT. WATER CO.3975 M. 7TH STREET
FELSPAR GARDENS MUT. WATER co. 4329 GLEN
GALENA MUTUAL WATER Co. 8184 GALENA ST.
WESTERN MMD . RAINBOW CANYON 6377 RIVERSIDE AVE
RIO RANCHOS MUTUAL WATER CO. 3940 WALLACE
PEARSON MUTUAL WATER CO.
RUBIDOUX COMMUNITY SERVICES DIST
RUNNING SPRINGS CO. MATER DIST. P.O. BOX 145
SAN BERNARDINO CITY WATER SUPPLY195 D STREET
OILLSON MUTUAL WATER CO. 284 E. MARSHALL BLVD.
HOLDEN WATER co. 764FOISY ST.
VAN LOON MUTUAL MATER co.
EASTWOOD FARMS COMM. WATER USERS25019 E. FIFTH ST.
ARROYO VERDE MUTUAL WATER co. 7507 BONNIE ST.
•ASELINE GARDENS MUT. WATER co. " ~
CAMP WATERMAN MUTUAL WATER CO.
CARDIFF FARMS MUTUAL WATER CO.
GIFFCRD PARK MUTUAL WATER CO.
•"ONTECITO MUTUAL WATER co.
SUNNYSIDE MUTUAL WATER CO.
VALLEY FARMS MUTUAL WATER CO.
VICTORIA FARMS MUTUAL WATER co.
SAN BERN.COUNTY W.WKS.DIST. NO.8
SAN BERN. C. SERVICE AREA NO. 2 1126 ANDERSON ST.
SAN BERN. C. SERVICE AREA NO. 42P.O. BOX L
SAN BERN. VALLEY M.W.D. 35192 CEDAR AVE
SAN JACINTO CITY WATER SUPPLY P.O. BOX 488
FRUITVALE MUTUAL WATER CO. BOX 565
ARROWHEAD VILLAS MUT* SERVICE COP.O. BOX 77
•KYFOREST MUTUAL WATER COMPANY
s. SAN BERN, c.w.o.-SOUTH SYSTE"822 TIPPECAMOE AVE.
S. SAN BERN. C.W.D.-NORTH SYSTEM882 TIPPECANOE
SUNFAIR WATER CO.
6DGEMONT GARDENS MUTUAL WATER CO
SUNNYMEAD MUT. WATER CO.
NAME OF SUPPLY
24744 E. BASELINE ST.
24775 CARDIFF
8944 GIFFORD ST.
P.O. BOX 327
9367 WASHINGTON ST.
IDYLLWILD* CALIF. 92349
PINON HILLS. CALIF. 92372
PIONEERTOWN. CALIF. 92268
TEMECULA. CALIF. 929*0
RANCHO MIRAGE* CALIF. 92270
REDLANOS. CALIF. 92373
REDLANDS, CALIF. 92373
REDLANDS* CALIF. 92973
RIALTO* CALIF. 92976
RIM FOREST. CALIF. 92978
RIM FOREST. CALIFORNIA 92978
RIM FOREST. CALIF. 92971
RIVERSIDE* CALIF. 92902
RIVERSIDE* CALIF. 92509
RIVERSIDE* CALIF. 92501
RIVERSIDE* CALIF. 92502
RIVERSIDE* CALIF. 92509
RIVER SIDE, CALIF. 92509
RIVERSIDE* CALIF. 92506
RUBIDOUX. CALIF. 92509
RIVERSIDE* CALIF. 92509
RUBIDOUX* CALIF. 92509
RUNNING SPRINGS* CALIF. 92982
SAN BERNARDINO* CALIF. 92401
SAN BERNARDINO* CALIF. 92404
SAN BERNARDINO* CALIF. 92408
SAN BERNARDINO, CALIF. 92400
SAN BERNARDINO* CALIF. 92410
SAN BERNARDINO. CALIF 92405
SAN BERNARDINO, CALIF. 92403
SAN BERNARDINO, CALIF. 92403
SAN BERNARDINO, CALIF. 924oa
SAN BERNADINO. CALIF. 92408
SAN BERNARDINO* CALIF. 92402
SAN BERNARDINO* CALIF. 92402
SAN BERNARDINO* CALlF. 92408
SAN BERNARDINO* CALIF. 92400
SLEPPY HOLLOW, CALIF. 91710
LOMA LINDA, CALIF. 92354
ORO GRANDE, CALIF. 929*8
YUCAIPA. CALIF. 92399
SAN JACINTO* CALIF. 92383
SAN JACINTO* CALIF. 92383
SKYFOREST* CALIF. 92385
SKYFOREST* CALIF. 92985
SAN BERNARDINO, CALIF. 92408
SAN BERNARDINO* CALIF. 92408
SUNFAlR. CALIF. 92292
SUNNYMEAO* CALIF 92388
SUNNYMEAD* CALIF. 92388
o
00
-------
900000000000
I. D. *
905779410330
905779*50330
905779900330
905782450360
903792610360
9C5799810360
905801010360
905801300360
905801250360
903803400360
905003420360
903803430360
903808830330
9C3814860360
903823000330
90583*650330
905837300330
903838930330
903839000360
905861050360
905862830360
905862150360
903862160360
905867*10360
905867650360
905867*60360
905868030360
905868460360
SMSA
POP.
050
075
150
240
5020
7900
500
750
400
31500
612
2400
070
12000
380
3700
073
380
10850
1200
040
100
1200
5000
085
070
4700
5000
LISTING OF WATER SUPPLIES FROM THE "CwSS"
SAN BERNARDINO-R1VERSIDE-ONTARIO* CALIFORNIA
NAME OF SUPPLY
OECK^AN ESTATES MUT. WATER ASSN.P.Oo BOX 255
FULLER MUTUAL WATER Co. 83355 AVE. 35
THOMAS MOUNTAIN MUT. WATER CO.
THUNDERBlR!? COUNTY WATER OIST.
SEARLES DOMESTIC WATER CO.
TWENTYNINE PALMS CO. WATER DEPT.6544 ADOBE ROAD
ALPINE WATER USERS ASSN. P.O. BOX 122
STRAWBERRY FLATS MATER ASSN. P.O. BOX 31
STRAWBERRY LODGE MUT. WATER CO. BOX 7
UPLAND CITY WATER SUPPLY CITY HALL
TIOGA MUTUAL WATER CO.
SAN ANTONIO WATER CO.
VALLEY VIEW MUTUAL WATER ASSN.
VICTORVILLE CO. WATER DISTRICT
WALLER TRACT WATER SYSTEM
WESTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT
WEST PALM SPRINGS WATER CO.
WEST RIVERSIDE MUTUAL WATER co. 2540 HALL ST.
WEST SAN BERNARDINO C.W.D.
CALIFORNIA CITIES WATER CO.
UNION PACIFIC R.R. WATER SUPPLY
HEL-BRO WATER CO.
YERMO MUTUAL WATER co.
WESTERN HEIGHTS HATER CO.
OAK GLEN DOMESTIC MATER CO.
YUCAjPA TRIPLE FALLS MUTUAL
YUCCA WATER CO. LTD.
YUCCA VALLEY COUNTY WATER DIST. 6935 OLD WOMAN SPRINGS RD.
139 N. EUCLID AVE.
SECTION 17* 61511 OLD ROUTE 10
15073 SEVENTH STREET
43.778 E. CIRCLE DR.
225 N. SECOND ST.
225 N. SECOND ST.
PILGRIM CAMP
WATER COMPANY
INDIO. CALIF. 92201
THERMAL. CALIF. 92274
MOUNTAIN CENTER. CALIF. 92361
APPLE VALLEY, CALlF. 92307
TRONA. CALIFORNIA 93562
TWENTYNINC PALMSo CALIF. 92277
TWIN PEAKS. CALIF. 92391
TWIN PEAKS, CALIF* 92391
TWIN PEAKS. CALIF* 92391
UPLANDi CALIF. 91786
UPLAND* CALIF. 91786
UPLAND* CALIF. 91786
RIVERSIDE* CALIF. 92502
VICTORVILLE. CALIF. 92392
NORTH INDIO* CALIF. 92201
RIVERSIDE* CALIF. 92506
WEST PALM SPRINGS* CALIF. 92282
WEST RIVERSIDE* CALIF. 92509
RIALTOf CALIF. 92376
WRIGHTWOOD, CALIF. 92397
YERMO. CALIF. 92398
YERMO. CALIF. 92398
YERMO. CALIF. 92398
YUCAIPA, CALIF. 92399
YUCAIPA, CALIFORNIA 92399
YUCAIPA, CALIF. 92399
YUCCA VALLEY; CALII. 92284
YUCCA VALLEY. CALIF. 92284
o
10
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT THE REGIONAL REPRESENTATIVE, BUREAU OF WATER HYGIENE, DHEW REGION IX,
50 FULTON STREET, SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94102. TEL: 415-556-5677.
-------
- no -
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
CONSUMER -- One person using the water for domestic and
culinary purposes.
CROSS CONNECTION -- Any physical connection or arrangement
between two otherwise separate piping systems,
one of which contains potable water and the
other either water of unknown or questionable
safety, or steam, gas, or chemical, whereby there
may be a flow from one system to the other, the
direction of flow depending on the pressure
differential between the two systems.
FECAL COLIFORM BACTERIA -- That portion of the total coliform
population which are capable of lactose fermentation
at an elevated temperature of 44.5°C. Unlike
some strains of the non-fecal members of the
total coliform group, fecal coliforms have a
specific high order of positive correlation
with warm-blooded animal pollution, survive for a
shorter time in water and soil, and more closely
correlate with survival patterns of enteric pathogenic
bacteria.
INTER-CONNECTION -- A connection between the water supply and
one or more additional sources of water not under
the jurisdiction or control of the water supply
operator.
MANDATORY LIMIT-- The upper limit of density of coliform bacteria
as described in Section 3.23, as modified below,
of the concentrations of certain ions as described
in Section 5.22 and 5.23 and of radioactivity as
described in Section 6.22, Public Health Service
Drinking Water Standards, 1962 (PHS Publication
No. 956). For these samples collected for this
study, the bacterial limit was exceeded if the
arithmetic average was more than 1 coliform per
100 ml, or if 2 or more samples (5% or more if 20
or more were examined) contained more than 4 coliforms
per 100 ml.
-------
- Ill -
OPERATOR -- The operator at the treatment plant responsible for
the day-to-day operation of the treatment facilities.
Where there is no treatment, the person responsible
for the operation of the system.
PLATE COUNT --, A measure of the general bacterial population
present in the water sample as described in Standard
Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater,
12th Ed. These bacteria will produce colonies on
plate count agar in 48 hours when incubated at
35°C (95°F).
RECOMMENDED LIMIT -- The upper limit of concentration of
turbidity, color, chemicals and radioactivity as
described in Sections 4.2; 5.21; 6.21 and Section
C, page 21, PHS Drinking Water Standards, 1962
(PHS Publication No. 956).
SERVICE CONNECTION -- A physical connection to a water main
for the purpose of conveying water to a building
or onto a premise for use.
TOTAL VERIFIED COLIFORMS --Microorganisms that include a
heterogeneous grouping of bacteria which are
identified by bacteriological procedures to
produce aldehydes on Endo media at 35°C and were
shown to ferment lactose with gas production
within 48 hours at 35°C in either aerobic or
facultative anaerobic environments. Because these
bacteria are eliminated in large numbers in fecal
wastes, they have been the traditional bacteriological
tool used to measure the occurrence and intensity
of contamination in water supplies.
------- |